FLD2005-11107ti
4
Clearwater
l J
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE
CASE W-"' T?? fj - (? 1Cy'
DATE RECEIVED: ?-
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
NOTE: 1.5 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION R I G I N A L
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04-05-05)
PLEASE TYPE OR PR1NT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: -06.11na n He 4s0 V1
MAILING ADDRESS: 1 Z 51 O acdoi+d'1 i yl o r L 33 b Zb
PHONE NUMBER: _ -N-7 - 691 - .. S S ? FAX NUMBER: `d -7- ?/ y 6 - 79S'6
PROPERTY OWNER(S): 4? C 0 ±:t IA G SQy\
(Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6)
AGENT NAME: C N idd 04 Ne,1s6Y)
MAILING ADDRESS: L S) o PalaM,?'fja ?-C. ?AYytLJ )= L 3U Z (o
PHONE NUMBER: Jf ?? S? 9 1 FAX NUMBER: - Li to - p S?i
CELL NUMBER: :7,9:2 " ( H 1 - S?S7S 7 E-MAIL ADDRESS: C 0. ?I
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
c? (a G-tk i X 1 T 8 'gaw O
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: - ]
/ y ? +
'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: a e 9-- 90ayt ?ck C-4 SLlfV2
(if not listed here, please note the locat on of this document in t e ubfmi tal)
!:7 2 q ZO ®0 D
PARCEL NUMBER
O Z
1
--
:
,F
L
1
0 _ - - +
?
-
f
"
C
t
.
b 00 S
PARCEtfiStZE:
Q f2
' \ \
17
(acres, square feet) J , 'r v
OP '.13 USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT:
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
li'lNT
.___+r4 X11 !..-r.''_ ?+??I?iy:? ??.r4-.??. ,
?
'
(
"
' wl
See COY U1
?
-
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):
ql yst erl
?
-
Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
5 U;hA TAYLOtL ,
C' Pc_ pig a-p I a v? 1/ 3 o
1 #'?K q- Z
4 Q
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO _V' (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
O SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
. r.
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
/Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of.operation.impacts,
on adjacent properties.
V 0 2 2005
JI/ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable)-.Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
!?e e I'"'r'rCtc,kmq !nf
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
a
l ?
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
Se e
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater
,, ORIGIN
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
tX
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
k?
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14,of Article 3 will beyavailable to l
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. :Ji -I v !`.
c 2005
NQ ANNIRNIG D'a'r ? I ,'ZNT
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division ,5 WArtiicle C(Os pplic bile).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUSMITrtWL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Crite
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involy(
addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance wit[
the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemptior
to this requirement.
If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following:
- Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ORIGIN4
- Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
- All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention rea incI di top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
A narrative describing the proposed stor ater contr I plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the
City manual.
Signature and seal of Florida Registere P fessio I Engineer n II plans and calculations.
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTE O
(SWFWMD R S UT WEST F ATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
/ approval is required prior issua ce f City ilding P rmit), if applicable
C: / Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requi ements ( plica " must initial ne of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall
be provided. NO VX9-W ULt"I?"7S ar ". I'trL&\5 0,r2 b-- Prf 054
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
I VA TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
IV including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; A i -TgC ?r-S 6N PXD?F-AT Y
/ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
S9 PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to
the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
NA GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
1?/A PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
Z/ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions; f =' i
North arrow; ??• ='3-?-??
_? Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map; NOV n c? G ??0?
t? Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; UY
? Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structur s; pn?p? ?f
All required setbacks; Alo Ct4MC-(_5 To 5XiSI/Ner 8UIL011U0-S PL&NVI???7LiGi'%a+?•?•N T
All existing and proposed points of access; Cfly OF C-1C Rr 1, Yi tEGR
Z All required sight triangles;
IJ& Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
V/ Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
4Z Location of existing public and private u ilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sew Friines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per
Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701);
A/.A Location of all landscape material;
A?A Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
21 SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: ORIGINAL
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
NOV ? Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) and color rendering if possible;
? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
_ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
_ Offsite elevations if required toe lua the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
ls and earth berms;
Location of all earth or wat in' ke);
_ Lot lines and building line i n onStreets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
- Structural overhangs;
- Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
? LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
_ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
_ Delineation and dimensions of all parki areas cluding ndscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking space ;
Existing trees on-site and immediatel a jace to the e y species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Plant schedule with a key (symbol lab i icati a e, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed
landscape materials, including bot ical a com n na s;
_ Location, size, and quantities of al( xisting nd p oposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible);
? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
NOV 0 2 2005
,jip. ANtiit' ,G?,zl :....'&:.4T
C1W
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ???' •` `''?
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202'"A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project.
U/ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
11V REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
. LA
All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs
shall include the street address (numerals)
NA Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). n
Nit Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGINAL
I?
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersects n with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is
on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersecti.
Trip generation shall be based on the most ent editi of the In . ute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepare cor ce wit "S ing Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning
Department's Development Review Mana r o ei esign 2-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Commu y De pm en ode for ceptions to this requirement.
41 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway
legs an each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
Notary Public - State of
Commission # DD 365129
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
describ7inn application.
Signs of property o or represents e _ i^ •`?
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
S orn to and subscribed before me this day of
0Vt4i'l A. D. 2067 ?' to me and/or by
GNN?N ei.,_com who is personally known has
produced r l"v au_ 4 L; c e,,%.7.2- as
identification.
Notary pule, c,
My commission expires: Qc ?o ?w 2 /, 2 ??g
?,. y
Page 6 of 7 - Ftil'e Drevelopment:?ompetiehsive Infll Application 2005- City of Clearwater
• !
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
yo?74 t4tO'rOtn
(Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
6 2
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Gl?l ' X J'Pya? fir. ?2? 2, 2 r d uf, hesf,
3. That the undersigned (have) appointed and as/do) appoint: Cct k% n a k t/?e n f d 2?
as &/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and orr ct.
TRACY GENE WALTER Property Owner
'Ry PL,
;Notary Public - State of Raids
WCommIsslonEONOC121 20 8 Property Owner
Commission # OD 365129
Bonded ByNatlonolNotary Assn Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
. NrD
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by tile laws of the State of Florida, on this O? day of
4 V,449?*-- ;.0611" personally appeared J C v as rmIN who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. ,p
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: Z l y ;
SAPlanning Department\Application FormsWevelopment revieMflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc -i t?• - ; J
NOV o 2 2005
MY OF C171
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
Line-Comprehensive Infill Development Prot
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The request is to establish a Line-X Spray-On bedliner franchise in the rear building
(building #2) of the property located at 2862 Gulf to Bay Blvd. The subject property
is currently classified as Zone "C". Line-X Spray-on bedliners are not currently
classified in the City of Clearwater zoning codes. The Line-X franchise only involves
the installation of bedliners. The Line-X material is made up of 100% solids and does
not contain VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) or CFCs (Chlorofluorocarbons). The
existing sports bar, vacuum cleaner, and computer repair businesses will remain in
the front building (building #1) of the property. See attachments for the before
photos and proposed new site elevations. ORIGINAL
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA
1. The proposed development will not change the scale, bulk, coverage, and
density of the current site.
The character of the proposed development will compliment the adjacent
properties / businesses. These businesses include a gas station, an automotive
accessory business, a RV sales and service center and a tire sales, service and
installation business.
2. The proposed development of an additional automotive accessory business is a
complement to the adjacent business developments. As a result, the proposed
development will not hinder, discourage growth, or negativity impact the value
of the adjacent properties. The proposed development will have a positive
impact to the value of the adjacent land and buildings.
3. The proposed development will be operated in a closed environment, and
therefore will not have any safety or health risks to any persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
4. The proposed development is a low traffic business. Appointments are
scheduled in advance with an average of 4 - 6 appointments per day
minimizing traffic congestion. There are no parking space changes as a result
of the proposed development.
5. The proposed development includes significant improve mentsto;the-entT
site
consistent with the community character. See site elevation`_sf;.=;,.f ? ( ) - j -.
NnV 0 2 2005
PIMIK'k' "SD 7!1" 77" 'ENT
CI F C? !: ; +. i y7,
0 0
Line-X Comprehensive Infill Development Project
6. The proposed development hours of operation are Monday through Friday 8:00
am to 5:00 pm. The proposed development will be operated in a closed
environment. No adverse visual, acoustic or olfactory effects on adjacent
properties will occur.
C ?GNL
COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA
1. Line-X Spray on Bed Liners are currently not classified in the City of Clearwater
zoning definitions.
The proposed development includes significant improvements to the entire site
consistent with the community character. As a result, the fair market value of
the abutting properties will not be negativity affected, but instead, will be
affected in a positive way.
2. The existing value of the site is $925,000; the proposed value of the site with
improvements is $1,150,000.
3. Line-X Spray on Bed Liners are currently not classified in the City of Clearwater
zoning definitions.
4. The adjacent land uses are a gas station, an automotive accessory business, a
RV sales and service center and a tire sales, service and installation business.
The proposed redevelopment project is compatible with all of these adjacent
land uses.
5. Line-X Spray on Bed Liners are currently not classified in the City of Clearwater
zoning definitions.
6. The proposed development includes significant improvements to the entire site
consistent with the community character. As a result, the redevelopment
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity. (See site elevations)
7. The proposed development includes significant improvements to the entire site
consistent with the community character. These improvements will create the
form and function, and enhance the community character of the vicinity, as well
as the City of Clearwater as a whole. (See site elevations)
8. No changes are proposed for the redevelopment project that effect lot width,
required setbacks, height, or off-street parking.
9. No changes are proposed for the redevelopment project th.at,e_ffect off-street
parking.
10. Not Applicable NOV 0 2 2005
PUNK? 1\11.1
pa0'
pCp ?fMf6+
[I?Illlil
I'
wwtp I
PAW*w No I
I [ [ [ I
l?G.S
WWI
AC C?
CD
70
i
J
6UU% ' b t?kY %VP
-- w Row.
VWA(4 11cm or nay z
aff4U. b% Wl- , 4L 1-9
81, 1 4 li
TJI W,, W 2 2,Wo CP IAX
?tNN?' (f1tJ laew .os frtNx
LGw- K"
t m •OI 4m
a? 'O D aX
IMfWADUE.
Ib,7ao
•4t
ltva
AMERICAN LAND MLE ASSOCL477ON POLICY NO.
OWNER'S POLICY 10-17-92 (Florida Modified)
1. Title to the estate or Interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein;
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title;
3. Unmarketability of the title;
4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land.
The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title,
as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations.
ISSUED-BY
OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE OP-9-0449-2818
AMERICAN PIONEER
TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED
IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, AMERICAN PIONEER TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Florida corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule
A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or
incurred by the insured by reason of:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AMERICAN PIONEER TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy
to be signed and sealed as of the Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, the policy to become valid when
countersigned by an authorized signatory.
NnV 0 2 2005
Issued by.
Pioneer Title,
29247 U.S. Hwy.
Clearwater FL,
r- •.+ - ?• •.• - ., .? AMERICAN PIONEER TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
'
•,e'i o
?i;•;L?
Inc.
19 N.
34621
By W.
zatx"vv
President
Attest:
Secretary
OP-4
State: PL County Code: 62
OWN E R' E3
F O RM
Plant #
Policy Number
9-0449-2818
Reinsurance Number
SCHEDULE A
Agent/Branch #
(0449*97-07002)
Amount of Insurance Effective Date 6 Time Simultaneous Number
$340,000.00 August 15, 1997 12-0449-3807
04:54:OOPM
Commitment 1-0449-4735
1. Name of Insured:
SCOTT HUDSON
2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is
FEE SIMPLE
3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in the insured.
4. The land is described as follows:
The South 270 feet of the East 100 feet of the West 830 feet of the SW
1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East,
subject to the right-of-way of Gulf To Bay Boulevard, and subject to
easement for ingress and egress over the east fifteen (15) feet, as
recorded in Deed Book 1263, Page 577, and LESS that portion conveyed in
O.R. Book 6750, Page 808, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
NOV 0 2 2005
-IT
Issued by: 0449
l-- PIONEER TITLE, INC.
29247 US HIGHWAY 19 NORTH
Countersigned Authorized Signatory CLEARWATER, FL 34621
NOTE: This policy consists of insert pages labeled Schedules A and B. This policy is of no force and effect
unless all pages are included along with any added pages incorporated by reference.
Original Home Office Copy Agent's Copy Plant Copy
State: PL County Code: 62
OWNER • S F O RM
Plant # SCHEDULE B Agent/Branch #
(0449*97-07002)
Policy Humber: 9-0449-2818
This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the
following exceptions: ,
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the Public
Records.
2. Encroachments, Overlaps, Boundary lines disputes, and other matters
which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the
premises.
3. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the Public Records.
4. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens
by the Public Records.
5. Taxes and assessments for the year 1997 and subsequent years, which
are not yet due and payable.
6. Easement for uitlities installation and maintenance, in favor of
City Of Clearwater Florida, as recorded in O.R. Book'2911', at Page
62, Public records of PINELLAS County, Florida.
7. Ingress and Egress Easement, over and across the EAST 15 FEET of
subject property, as granted by James G. McKinley and Gladys
McKinley, his wife, to Dillard Lee Hudson and others by instrument
dated April 11, 1950, as recorded in Deed Book 1263, at Page 577,
Public records of PINELLAS County, Florida.
8. This Policy does not insure title to personal property or fixtures
located upon or attached to the premises described in Schedule "A".
9. Subject leases, or any unrecorded leasehold intefest, by any party
in posession.
***** SEE ATTACHED *****
***** SCHEDULE B *****
***** CONTINUATION PAGE 1 *****
NOV 0 2 2005
NOTE: This policy consists 'of"inseit'pdge? latieled Schedules A and B. This policy is of no force and effect
F *?",1nr ^a .- , - -- cN
unless all pagea.arw included.elong with-.1 added pages incorporated by reference.
Original F1 Home Office Copy Agent's Copy Plant Copy
State: FL County Code: 62 •
0 ORIGNAL
OWNER S F O RM
Ytant # SCHEDULE B Agent/Branch #
() CONTINUATION PAGE 1 (0449*97-07002)
Policy Number: 9-0449-2818
10. Mortgage executed by SCOTT HUDSON in favor of JAMES J. ORLANDO,
Trustee UDT 10/02/75 and LUCY TRIMARCO and ROSEMARY TRIMARCO,
Successor Trustees UDT 4/18/84 dated August 13th, 1997, recorded on
August 15th, 1997, in Official Records gook 9808, Page 1121, in the
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, securing a principal
amount of $270,000.00 recited in said mortgage.
NOTE: ABOVE ITEMS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 ARE HEREBY DELETED.
ISSUING OFFICE: PIONEER TITLE, INC., 29247 U. S. Highway #19 North
Clearwater, Florida 34621
(813) ... 787-5800 ...
Nov o 2 2005
-V CF Cl 7,-
NOTE: This policy consists of insert pages labeled Schedules A and B. This policy is of no force and effect
unless all pages are included along with any added pages incorporated by reference.
Original None Office Copy Agent's Copy Plant Copy
.V"-,D cow
qj
ORIGINAL
FLD2005-11107
2862 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Date Received: 11/02/2005
HUDSON, SCOTT l ? .
tats. +
NOV C 2 2005
ZONING DISTRICT: C r'YCFC; 77 2- 2
LAND USE: CG
ATLAS PAGE: 291B
PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED
CLWCoverSheet
I DISTRICTS
DIVISION 7. COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ("C")
Section 2-701. Intent and purpose.
The intent and purpose of the Commercial
District is to provide the citizens of the City of
§ 2-702
Clearwater with convenient access to goods and
services throughout the city without adversely
impacting the integrity of residential neighbor-
hoods, diminishing the scenic quality of the city or
negatively impacting the safe and efficient move-
ment of people and things within the City of
Clearwater.
Section 2-701.1. Maximum development po-
tential.
The Commercial District ("C") may be located
in more than one land use category. It is the
intent of the C District that development be
consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use
Plan as required by State law. The development
potential of a parcel of land within the C District
shall be determined by the standards found in
this Development Code as well as the Countywide
Future Land Use Designation of the property.
Development potential for the Countywide Fu-
ture Land Use Designations that apply to the C
District are as follows:
Countywide Future
Land Use Designation Maximum Dwelling Units
per Acne of Land Maximum Floor Area Ratio/
Impervious Surface Ratio Overnight Accommodations
Units per Acre
Commercial Neighborhood 10 dwelling units per acre FAR.40/ISR .80 N/A
Commercial Limited 18 dwelling units per acre FAR.45/ISR .85 30 units per acre
Commercial General 24 dwelling units per acre FAR.55ASR .W Q 40 units per acre
Residential/Office/Retail 18 dwelling units per acre FAR.40/LSR .85 30 units per acre
Section 2-702. Minimum standard develop-
ment.
standards set out in this section and other appli-
cable provisions of Article 3.
The following uses are Level One permitted
uses in the "C" District subject to the minimum
Table 2-702. "C" District Minimum Development Standards
Max
Min- Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street
Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) (ft.) Front (fl.) (fl.) (ft.) Parking Spaces
Governmental Uses(1) 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 411,000 SF GFA
5/1000 SF GFA
Indoor Recreation/ Entertain- 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 or Mane,
ment 2/court or 1/ma-
chine
Offices 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 4/1,000 SF GFA
Overnight Accommodations 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 1/unit
Supp. No. 15 CD2:47
§ 2-702 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-702. "C" District Minimum Development Standards
Max.
Min. Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street
Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) (ft.) Front (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Parking Spaces
1 per 20,000 SF
land area or as
determined by
Parks and Recreational Facili- the community
ties n/a n/a 25 25 10 20 development
coordinator
based on ITE
Manual stan-
dards
Places of Worship 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 1 per 2 seats
Restaurants 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 1511,000 SF
GFA
Retail Sales and Services 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 5/1,000 SF GFA
Social and Community Centers 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 5/1,000 SF GFA
Vehicle Sales/Display 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 2.5/1,000 SF
Lot Sales Area
(1) Governmental uses shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous
like uses which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to institutional
which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses.
(Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6928-02, § 10, 5-2-02)
Section 2-703. Flexible standard develop-
ment.
and criteria set out in this Section and other
applicable provisions of Article 3.
The following uses are Level On6 permitted
uses in the "C" District subject to the standards
Table 2-703. "C" District Flexible Standard Development Standards
Max.
Min. Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street
Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) (ft.) Front (ft.)* (ft.) (ft.) Parking Spaces
Accessory Dwellings n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 space per
unit
Adult Uses 5,000 50 25 25 10 20 5 per 1,000
GFA
Alcoholic Beverage Sales 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 5 per 1,000
GFA
Automobile Service Stations 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 5/1,000 SF GFA
Educational Facilities 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 1 per 2 stu-
dents
Governmental Uses(1) 10,000 100 25-50 25 10 20 4 spaces per
1
-1 1,000 GFA
Supp. No. 15 CD2:48
ZONING DISTRICTS
§ 2-703
Table 2-703. "C" District Flexible Standard Development Standard:,
Max.
Min. Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. S et
use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) (ft.) Front (ft.)* (ft.) ces
F
r
Indoor Recreation/Entertain- 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 25 10 20
ment rt
Medical Clinics 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 2-3/1,000
FA
Nightclubs 1
0,000
I
100 25 25 10 9
20 10 per 1,00&IVA
Offices 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 25 0-10 10-20 3-4 spaces
per 1,000 GFA
Off-Street Parking 10,000 100 n/a 25 10 20 n/a
Outdoor Retail Sales, Display 20
000 100 25 25 I0 20 ` 5 per 1,000 sf ofl
and/or Storage , i outdoor display .
Overnight Accommodations
20,000-40,000
150-200 25-50
25
0-10
IO-20 area
1 per unit
Places of Worship(2) 40, 20,,00000- 100-200 25-50 25 10 20 .5-1 per 2 seats
Public Transportation Facili- n/a n/a 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a
ties(3)
Restaurants 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-35 25 0-10 10-20 17-15 spaces
per 1,000 GFA
Retail Sales and Services 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-35 25 0-10 1120 4-5 spaces per
1,000 GFA
Social and Community Centers 3,500-10,000 35-100 25-35 25 0-10 10-20 4-5 spaces per
1,000 GFA
Utility/Infrastructure Facih- n/a n/a 20 25 10 20 n/a
ties(4)
2.5 spaces per
Vehicle Sales/Displays 20,000-40,000 150-200 25 25 10 20 1,000 of lot
sales area
Veterinary Offices or Animal 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 4 spaces per
Grooming and Boarding 1,000 GFA
*The front setback may be reduced to 15 feet for parking lots provided the land area is not
sufficient to accommodate the full setback requirement and the reduction results in an improved
site plan or improved design and appearance and landscaping is in excess of the minimum
required.
(1) Governmental uses shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous
like uses which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Institutional
which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses.
(2) Places of worship shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous
like uses which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Institutional
which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses.
(3) Public transportation facilities shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added
to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment
to Transportation/Utility which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses.
Supp. No. 15 CD2:49
§ 2-703
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
(4) Utility/Infrastructure uses shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to
contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to
Transportation/Utility which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses.
Flexibility criteria:
A. Accessory dwelling. One accessory dwelling,
which is subordinate and accessory to a principal
permitted use provided that:
1. Title to the accessory dwelling is vested in
the ownership of the principal use;
2. The floor area of the accessory dwelling
does not exceed 25 percent of the floor
area of the principal use.
B. Adult uses.
1. The parcel proposed for development fronts
on U.S. 19;
2. The use complies with each and every
requirement of Division 3 of Article 3.
C. Alcoholic beverage sales.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas;
2. The parcel proposed for development is
not located within 500 feet of a parcel of
land used for a place of worship or a
public or private school, unless the floor
area of the use which is devoted to the
display and storage of alcoholic beverages
is less than ten percent of the total floor
area of the use and there is no signage
located on the parcel proposed for devel-
opment which identifies the use as a loca-
tion where alcoholic beverages are sold;
3. The parcel proposed for development is
not located within 500 feet of a parcel of
land used for a place of worship or a
public or private school unless the inter-
vening land uses, structures or context
are such that the location of the alcoholic
beverage sales is unlikely to have an
adverse impact on such school or use as a
place of worship.
D. Automobile service stations.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas;
2. The use does not involve the overnight,
outdoor storage of automobiles;
3. No more than two service bays front on a
public street.
E. Educational facilities.
The parcel proposed for development fronts
on a road with at least four lanes;
2. The proposed development does not have
an access which connects to a local street
at a point more than 100 feet from the
four lane road on which the parcel pro-
posed for development fronts.
F. Governmental uses.
Height.
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping ar-
eas in excess of the minimum re-
quired or improved design and ap-
pearance.
b. The increased height will not reduce
the vertical component of the view
from any contiguous residential prop-
erty.
G. Indoor recreation /entertainment.
Off-streetparking: The physical character-
istics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require
fewer parking spaces per floor area than
otherwise required or that the use of
significant portions of the building will be
used for storage or other non-parking
demand-generating purposes.
Supp. No. 15 CD2:50
ZONING DISTRICTS
H. Medical clinics.
1. The use and design of the parcel proposed
for development is compatible with the
surrounding area.
2. Off-street parking: The physical character-
istics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require
fewer parking spaces per floor area than
otherwise required or that the use of
significant portions of the building will be
used for storage or other non-parking
demand-generating purposes.
I. Offices.
Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping area
in excess of the minimum required
or improved design and appearance.
b. The increased height will not reduce
the vertical component of the view
from any adjacent residential prop-
erty.
2. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
b. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance.
C. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not reduce the amount of
landscaped area otherwise required.
Off-street parking: The physical character-
istics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require
fewer parking spaces per floor area than
otherwise required or that the use of
significant portions of the building are for
storage or other non-parking demand gen-
eration purposes.
J. Nightclubs.
§ 2-703
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas;
2. The parcel proposed for development is
not located within 500 feet of a parcel of
land used for purposes of a place of wor-
ship or a public or private school unless
the intervening land uses, structures or
context are such that the location of the
nightclub is unlikely to have an adverse
impact on such school or use as a place of
worship.
K Off-street parking.
1. Access to and from the parking lot shall
be based on the size and design of the lot
and approved by the Community Devel-
opment Coordinator.,
2. All outdoor lighting is so designed and
located so that no light fixtures cast light
directly on to adjacent land.
3. If the parking lot is adjacent to residen-
tially used or zoning property, such off-
street parking spaces shall be screened by
a wall or fence of at least four feet in
height which is landscaped on the exter-
nal side with a continuous hedge or non-
deciduous vine.
L. Outdoor retail sales, display and/or stor-
age.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas unless the principal use is the sale
of living plant material;
2. No sign of any kind is designed or located
so that any portion of the sign is more
than six feet above the finished grade of
the front lot line of the parcel proposed for
development unless such signage is a part
of an approved comprehensive sign pro-
gram;
3. All buildings located on the parcel pro-
posed for development are finished or
painted in earth tone colors;
Supp. No. 15 CD2:51
§ 2-703 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
4. No cyclone, chainlink or other metal mesh
fences are located on the parcel proposed
for development;
5. All fences, excluding gates, are land-
scaped on the exterior of such fences with
continuous shrubs or vines and trees lo-
cated 20 feet on center;
6. No goods and materials other than living
plant material which are stored or dis-
played outside a building or structure are
located within a required setback;
7. The parcel proposed for outdoor storage or
display fully conforms to the require-
ments of Article 3 Division 7 in regard to
landscaping;
8. The height of non-living goods and mate-
rials stored or displayed outdoors shall
not exceed 15 feet;
9. No building materials or automobile parts
or supplies which are stored or displayed
outdoors shall be visible from a public
right-of-way.
M. Overnight accommodations.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area and width will not result in a build-
ing which is out of scale with existing
buildings in the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development fronts on but will not
involve direct access to a major arterial
street;
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping ar-
eas in excess of the minimum re-
quired and/or improved design and
appearance;
b. The increased height will not reduce
the vertical component of the view
from any adjacent residential prop-
erty.
4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless such
signage is a part of an approved compre-
hensive sign program.
5. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side or rear setback
does not prevent access to the rear of
any building by emergency vehicles;
b. The reduction in side or rear setback
results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance;
C. The reduction in side or rear setback
does not reduce the amount of land-
scaped area otherwise required.
N. Places of worship.
1. Lot area:
a. The reduction in lot area will not
result in a building which is out of
scale with existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel pro-
posed for development;
b. The reduction in lot area does not
prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
C. The reduction in lot area results in
an improved site plan, more efficient
parking or improved design and ap-
pearance;
d. The reduction in lot area does not
reduce the day/night activity level
along building facades on public
streets.
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development fronts on but will not
involve direct access to a major arterial
street;
Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping ar-
eas in excess of the minimum re-
quired and/or improved design and
appearance;
Supp. No. 15 CD2:52
ZONING DISTRICTS § 2-703
b. The increased height will not reduce 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
the vertical component of the view for development fronts on but will not
from any adjacent residential prop- involve direct access to a major arterial
erty. street;
4. Off-street parking: The total number of 3. Height:
off-street parking spaces including off-site a. The increased height results in an
parking spaces within 600 feet of the improved site plan, landscaping ar-
parcel proposed for development will be eas in excess of the minimum re-
available on a shared basis to meet the quired and/or improved design and
peak period demands of the facility. appearance;
5. Lot width. The parcel proposed for devel- b. The increased height will not reduce
opment was an existing lot of less than the vertical component of the view
200 feet and was not in common owner- from any adjacent residential prop-
ship with any contiguous property on May erty.
1, 1998 or the reduction in lot width will 4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
not result in building which is out of scale
located so that any portion of the sign is
with existing buildings in the immediate more than six feet. above the finished
vicinity of the parcel proposed for devel- grade of the front lot line of the parcel
opment. proposed for development unless such
0. Public transportation facilities. signage is a part of an approved compre-
hensive sign program;
1. The public transportation facilities are 5. Side and rear setback:
not located within 1,000 feet of another
public transportation facility unless nec- a. The reduction in side and rear set-
essary to serve established transit stops back does not prevent access to the
with demonstrated ridership demand; rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
2. The public transportation facilities are
designed, located and landscaped so that b. The reduction in side and rear set-
the structures are screened from view back results in an improved site plan,
from any residential use or land desig- more efficient parking or improved
nated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; design and appearance;
C. The reduction in side and rear set-
3. Any lighting associated with the public back does not reduce the amount of
transportation facilities is designed and landscaped area otherwise required.
located so that no light is cast directly on
any residential use or land designated as 6. Off-street parking:
residential in the Zoning Atlas. a. The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
P. Restaurants. likely uses of the property will re-
1. Lot area and width: The parcel proposed quire fewer parking spaces per floor
for development was an existing lot of less area than otherwise required or that
than 10,000 square feet and was not in the use of significant portions of the
common ownership with any contiguous building will be used for storage or
property on May 1, 1998 or the reduction other non-parking demand-generat-
in lot area will not result in a building ing purposes;
which is out of scale with existing build- b. Fast food restaurants shall not be
ings in the immediate vicinity of the par- eligible for a reduction in the num-
cel proposed for development; ber of off-street parking spaces.
Supp. No. 15 CD2:53
§ 2-703 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
Q. Social and community centers. eas in excess of the minimum re-
l. The parcel proposed for development does quired or improved design and ap-
not abut any property designated as res- pearance;
idential in the Zoning Atlas. b. The increased height will not reduce
2. Front setback: The reduction in front set- the vertical component of the view
back results in an improved site plan or from any contiguous residential prop-
improved design and appearance.
3. Side and rear setback: The reduction in
side and/or rear setback is necessary to
preserve protected trees and/or results in
an improved site plan or more efficient
design and appearance and results in
landscaping in excess of the minimum
required.
4. Lot size and width: The parcel proposed
for development was an existing lot of less
than 10,000 square feet and was not in
common ownership with any contiguous
property on May 1, 1998.
5. Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping ar-
eas in excess of the minimum re-
quired or improved design and ap-
pearance;
b. The increased height will not reduce
the vertical component of the view
from any contiguous residential prop-
erty.
6. Off-street parking: The physical character-
istics are such that the likely uses of the
property will require fewer parking spaces
per floor area than otherwise required or
that the use of significant portions of the
building will be used for storage or other
non-parking demand-generated purposes.
R. Retail sales and service.
1. Lot size and width: The parcel proposed
for development was an existing lot of less
than 10,000 square feet and was not in
common ownership with any contiguous
property on May 1, 1998.
2. Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping ar-
Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
b. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance;
C. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not reduce the amount of
landscaped area otherwise required.
4. Off-street parking: The physical character-
istics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require
fewer parking spaces per floor area than
otherwise required or that the use of
significant portions of the building will be
used for storage or other non-parking
demand-generating purposes.
S. Utility/ infrastructure facilities.
1. Any above ground structure other than
permitted telecommunication towers and
utility distribution lines located on or
along a rear lot line shall be screened
from view by a landscaped opaque wall or
fence which is at least two-thirds the
height of the above ground structure and
shall be landscaped with trees and hedges
which five years after installation will
substantially obscure the fence or wall
and the above ground structure.
T. Vehicle sales/displays.
1. The gross floor area of enclosed buildings
is at least 7,000 square feet;
2. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas;
Supp. No. 15 CD2:54
ZONING DISTRICTS
3. No area suitable for the display of vehi-
cles for sale is located within the front
setback of the parcel proposed for devel-
opment;
4. Provision is made to dim outdoor lighting
at all times when the automobile sales
and service uses is not open to the public
to that level necessary to maintain the
security of the premises;
5. The use of the parcel proposed for devel-
opment fronts on but will not involve
direct access to a major arterial street.
U. Veterinary offices, or animal grooming/
boarding.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas;
§ 2-704
2. The use of the parcel proposed for devel-
opment does not involve animal confine-
ment facilities that are open to the out-
side.
(Ord. No. 6417-99, § 3, 8-19-99; Ord. No. 6526-00,
§ 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6928-02, §§ 11-14, 5-2-02;
Ord. No. 7449-05, § 9, 12-15-05)
Section 2-704. Flexible development.
The following uses are Level Two permitted
uses in the "C" District subject to the standards
and criteria set out in this section and other
applicable provisions of Article 3.
Table 2-704. "C° District Flexible Development Standards
Min. Lot Max Min.
Min. Lot Area Width Height Front Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street
use (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft-) (ft.) (ft.) Parking
Alcoholic Beverage Sales 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 5 per 1,000
GFA
Determined by
the community
development
Comprehensive Infill coordinator
Redevelopment Project n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a based on the
specific use
and/or ME
Manual stan-
dards
3--5/1000 SF
Indoor Recreation/Entertain- 3,500-10,000 30-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 GFA or 3=5/
ment lane, 1-21court
or 1/machine
Light Assembly 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 4-5 spaces per
1,000 GFA
Limited Vehicle Service 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 4-5 spaces per
1,000 GFA
Marina Facilities 5,000-20,000 50 25 25 10 20 1 space per 2
slips
Mixed Use 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20
Nightclubs 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 10 per 1,000
GFA
4--5 spaces per
1,000 GFA and
2 spaces per residential
unit
Supp. No. 16 CD2:55
§ 2-704
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 2-704. "C" District Flexible Development Standards
Min. Lot Max. Min.
Min. Lot Area Width Height Front Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street
Use (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Parking
Offices 3,500-10,000 30-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 3-4 spaces per
1,000 GFA
Off-Street Parking 10,000 100 n/a 15-25 0-10 10-20 n/a
1-10 per 1,000
SQ FT of land
area or as de-
Outdoor Recreation/Entertain- termined by the
ment 20,000 100 25 15-25 10 10-20 community de-
velopment coor-
dinator based
on ITE Manual
standards
Overnight Accommodations 20,000--40,000 100-200 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 1 per unit
Problematic Uses 5,000 50 25 15-25 10 10-20 5 spaces per
1,000 SF GFA
Restaurants 3,500-10,000 35-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 7-15 spaces
per 1,000 GFA
Retail Sales and Services 3,500-10,000 30-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 4-5 spaces per
1,000 GFA
RV Parks 40,000 200 25 15-25 20 10-20 1 space per RV
space
1 per 20 units
Self Storage 20,000 100 25 15-25 10 10-20 plus 2 for
manager's of-
fice
Social/Public Service Agen-
cies(1) 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 3-4 spaces per
1,000 GFA
Refer to
Telecommunication Towers 10,000 100 section 25 10 20 n/a
3-2001
2.5 spaces per
Vehicle Sales/Displays 10,000-40,000 100-200 25 15-25 10 10-20 1,000 SQ FT of
l ot area .
Veterinary Offices or Grooming 5
000-10
000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 4 spaces per
and Boarding ,
, 1,000 GFA
(1) Social/public service agencies shall not exceed five acres.
Flexibility criteria:
A. Alcoholic beverage sales.
Location:
a. The parcel proposed for development
is not contiguous to a parcel of land
which is designated as residential in
the Zoning Atlas;
b. The parcel proposed for development
is not located within 500 feet of a
parcel of land used for a place. of
worship or public or private school
unless the floor area of the use which
is devoted to the display and storage
of alcoholic beverages is less than
ten percent of the total floor area of
the use and there is no signage lo-
Supp. No. 16 CD2:56
ZONING DISTRICTS
cated on the parcel proposed for de-
velopment which identifies the use
as a location where alcoholic bever-
ages are sold;
C. The parcel proposed for development
is not located within 500 feet of a
parcel of land used for a place of
worship or a public or private school
unless the intervening land uses,
structures or context are such that
the location of the alcoholic beverage
sales is unlikely to have an adverse
impact on such school or use as a
place of worship;
d. The use of the parcel proposed for
development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
2. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area and/or will not result in a building
which is out of scale with existing build-
ings in the immediate vicinity of the par-
cel proposed for development.
3. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
4. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
b. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking layout or im-
proved design and appearance and
landscaped areas are in excess of the
minimum required.
B. Marina facilities.
The parcel proposed for development is
not located in areas identified in the Com-
prehensive Plan as areas of environmen-
tal significance including:
a. The north end of Clearwater Beach;
b. Clearwater Harbor grass beds;
C. Cooper's Point;
d. Clearwater Harbor spoil islands;
§ 2-704
e. Sand Key Park;
f. The southern edge of Alligator Lake
No commercial activities other than the
mooring of boats on a rental basis shall be
permitted on any parcel of land which is
contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas, unless the marina facility is totally
screened from view from the contiguous
land which is designated as residential
and the hours of operation of the commer-
cial activities are limited to the time pe-
riod between sunrise and sunset.
3. Lot area: The parcel proposed for develop-
ment was an existing lot of less than
20,000 square feet and was not in com-
mon ownership with any contiguous prop-
erty on May 1, 1998 or the reduction in lot
width will not result in a facility which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
4. All marina facilities shall comply with the
commercial dock requirements set forth
in Section 3-601.C.3 and the marina and
marina facilities requirements set forth in
Section 3-603.
C. Comprehensive infill redevelopment projects.
1. The development or redevelopment is oth-
erwise impractical without deviations from
the use and/or development standards set
forth in this zoning district;
2. The development or redevelopment will
be consistent with the goals and policies
of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as
with the general purpose, intent and ba-
sic planning objectives of this Code, and
with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district;
3. The development or redevelopment will
not impede the normal and orderly devel-
opment and improvement of surrounding
properties;
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer sub-
stantial detriment as a result of the pro-
posed development;
Supp. No. 16 CD2:57
§ 2-704 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be per-
mitted by the underlying future land use
category, be compatible with adjacent land
uses, will not substantially alter the es-
sential use characteristics of the neighbor-
hood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objec-
tives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in
this zoning district as a minimum
standard, flexible standard or flexi-
ble development use;
b. The proposed use would be a signif-
icant economic contributor to the city's
economic base by diversifying the
local economy or by creating jobs;
C. The development proposal accommo-
dates the expansion or redevelop-
ment of an existing economic contrib-
utor;
d. The proposed use provides for the
provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for devel-
opment or redevelopment in an area
that is characterized by other simi-
lar development and where a land
use plan amendment and rezoning
would result in a spot land use or
zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the
development of a new and/or preser-
vation of a working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width,
required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified based on demon-
strated compliance with all of the follow-
ing design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not
impede the normal and orderly de-
velopment and improvement of the
surrounding properties for uses per-
mitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies
with applicable design guidelines
adopted by the city;
C. The design, scale and intensity of
the proposed development supports
the established or emerging charac-
ter of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually
interesting and attractive appear-
ance, the proposed development in-
corporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
• Changes in horizontal building
planes;
• Use of architectural details such
as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters, porticos, balconies, rail-
ings, awnings, etc.;
• Variety in materials, colors and
textures;
• Distinctive fenestration patterns;
• Building stepbacks; and
• Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides
for appropriate buffers, enhanced
landscape design and appropriate dis-
tances between buildings.
D. Light assembly.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area and/or width will not result in a
building which is out of scale with exist-
ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
2. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
3. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and/or rear
setback does not prevent access to
the rear of any building by emer-
gency vehicles;
b. The reduction in side and/or rear
setback results in an improved site
plan, more efficient parking or im-
proved design and appearance and
landscaping areas are in excess of
the minimum required.
Supp. No. 16 CD2:58
ZONING DISTRICTS
4. Off-street parking: The physical character-
istics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require
fewer parking spaces per floor area than
otherwise required or that the use of
significant portions of the building will be
used for storage or other non-parking
demand-generating purposes.
5. The parcel proposed for development shall
have no outdoor storage of goods, materi-
als and products.
6. The parcel proposed for development shall
have no process carried on within the
building which causes any external nega-
tive impact with regard to noise, fumes, or
odors.
7. The building design of the parcel pro-
posed for development shall be architec-
turally compatible with the surrounding
area.
E. Limited vehicle service.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area and/or width will not result in a
building which is out of scale with exist-
ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
2. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance and land-
scaped areas are in excess of the mini-
mum required.
3. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and/or rear
setback does not prevent access to
the rear of any building by emer-
gency vehicles;
b. The reduction in side and/or rear
setback results in an improved site
plan, more efficient parking, or im-
proved design and appearance and
landscaped areas are in excess of the
minimum required.
4. Off-street parking: The physical character-
istics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require
fewer parking spaces per floor area than
§ 2-704
otherwise required or that the use of
significant portions of the building will be
used for storage or other non-parking
demand-generating purposes.
5. Garage doors and bays shall be located
perpendicular to the abutting streets. Bays
shall be screened from adjacent property
by landscaped walls or fences.
6. The facade of the building which fronts on
public roads are designed with windows,
cornices or other architectural features or
treatments.
7. The use does not involve the overnight,
outdoor storage of automobiles.
8. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas.
9. The design of the parcel proposed for
development is compatible with the sur-
rounding area.
F. Mixed use.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area and/or width will not result in a
building which is out of scale with exist-
ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
2. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
3. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and/or rear
setback does not prevent access to
the rear of any building by emer-
gency vehicles.
b. The reduction in side and/or rear
setback results in an improved site
plan, more efficient parking, or im-
proved design appearance and land-
scaped areas are in excess of the
minimum required.
4. Off-street parking: The physical character-
istics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require
fewer parking spaces per floor area than
Supp. No. 16 CD2:59
§ 2-704 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
otherwise required or that the use of proved design and appearance and
significant portions of the building are landscaped areas are in excess of the
used for storage or other non-parking minimum required.
demand-generating purposes.
H. Offices.
5. The increased height results in an im- 1. Height:
proved site plan, landscaping areas in
excess of the minimum required or im- a. The increased height results in an
proved design and appearance. improved site plan, landscaping ar-
eas in excess of the minimum re-
G. Nightclubs. quired or improved design and ap-
1. Location: pearance;
b. The increased height will not reduce
a. The parcel proposed for development the vertical component of the view
is not contiguous to a parcel of land from any adjacent residential prop-
which is designated as residential in erty.
the Zoning Atlas;
2. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
b. The parcel proposed for development located so that any portion of the sign is
is not located within 500 feet of a more than six feet above the finished
parcel of land used for a place of grade of the front lot line of the parcel
worship or a public or private school proposed for development unless such
unless the intervening land uses, signage is a part of an approved compre-
structures or context are such that hensive sign program;
the location of the nightclub is un- 3
Side and rear setback:
likely to have an adverse impact on .
such school or use as a place of a. The reduction in side and rear set-
worship; back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
c. The use of the parcel proposed for vehicles;
development has frontage on an ar-
terial street but will not involve di- b. The reduction in side and rear set-
rect access to a major arterial street; back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
2. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot design and appearance;
area and width will not result in a build- c. The reduction in side and rear set-
ing which is out of scale with existing .
back does not reduce the amount of
buildings in the immediate vicinity of the landscaped area otherwise required.
parcel proposed for development.
4. Off-street parking: The physical character-
3. Front setback: The reduction in front set- istics of a proposed building are such that
back results in an improved site plan or the likely uses of the property will require
improved design and appearance. fewer parking spaces per floor area than
4. Side and rear setback: otherwise required or that the use of
significant portions of the building for
a. The reduction in side and/or rear storage or other non-parking demand-
setback does not prevent access to generating purposes.
the rear of any building by emer- 5
Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
gency vehicles; .
area and width will not result in a build-
b. The reduction in side and/or rear ing which is out of scale with existing
setback results in an improved site buildings in the immediate vicinity of the
plan, more efficient parking, or im- parcel proposed for development.
Supp. No. 16 CD2:60
ZONING DISTRICTS
6. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved appearance and landscaped ar-
eas are in excess of the minimum re-
quired.
I. Off-street parking.
1. Access to and from the parking lot shall
be based on the size and design of the lot
and approved by the community develop-
ment coordinator.
2. All outdoor lighting is. so designed and
located so that no light fixtures cast light
directly onto adjacent land.
3. If the parking lot is adjacent to residen-
tially used or zoning property, such off-
street parking spaces shall be screened by
a wall or fence of at least four feet in
height which is landscaped on the exter-
nal side with a continuous hedge or non-
deciduous vine.
J. Outdoor recreation /entertainment.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas;
2. All signage is a part of a comprehensive
sign program;
3. Sound amplification is designed and con-
structed to ensure that no amplified sound
can be heard to the extent that the sound
is recognizable in meaning of words or the
melody of music or when wind conditions
are less than ten miles per hour at a
instance of more than 100 feet in all
directions or when wind conditions are
ten miles per hour or greater, at a dis-
tance of more than 150 feet in all direc-
tions;
4. All outdoor lighting is designed and con-
structed so that no light falls directly on
land other than the parcel proposed for
development;
5. Off-street parking: The operational char-
acter of the outdoor recreation/ entertain-
ment use and the location of the parcel
proposed for development is such that the
§ 2-704
likely use of the property will require
fewer parking spaces per land area than
otherwise required or that significant por-
tions of the land will be used for passive or
other non-parking demand-generating pur-
poses.
6. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
Rear setback:
a. The reduction in rear setback does
not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
b. The reduction in rear setback re-
sults in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking, or improved de-
sign and appearance and landscaped
areas are in excess of the minimum
required.
K Overnight accommodations.
Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area and width will not result in a build-
ing which is out of scale with existing
buildings in the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping ar-
eas in excess of the minimum re-
quired and/or improved design and
appearance;
b. The increased height will not reduce
the vertical component of the view
from any adjacent residential prop-
erty.
4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless such
signage is a part of an approved compre-
hensive sign program;
Supp. No. 16 CD2:61
§ 2-704
5. Side and rear setback:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
a. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
b. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance.
6. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
L. Problematic uses.
Location.
a. The parcel proposed for development
is not contiguous to a parcel of land
which is designated as residential in
the Zoning Atlas;
b. The use is not located within 500
feet of another problematic use;
2. Design.
a. The building in which the use is
located is painted or otherwise fin-
ished in materials and colors which
are muted;
b. There are no security bars on the
outside of doors or windows which
are visible from a public right-of-
way;
3. Signs. Any signage which has a height of
greater than six feet is a part of a compre-
hensive sign program;
4. The budding in which the use is located is
a building which is conforming to all cur-
rent land development and building reg-
ulations-
5. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
6. Rear setback:
a. The reduction in rear setback does
not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles.
b. The reduction in rear setback re-
sults in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking, or improved de-
sign and appearance and landscaped
areas are in excess of the minimum
required.
M. Restaurants.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development fronts on but will not
involve direct access to a major arterial
street;
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping ar-
eas in excess of the minimum re-
quired and/or improved design and
appearance;
b. The increased height will not reduce
the vertical component of the view
from any adjacent residential, prop-
erty.
4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless such
signage is a part of an approved compre-
hensive sign program;
i. Side and rear setback.
a. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
b. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance and land-
scaped areas are in excess of the
minimum required.
Supp. No. 16 CD2:62
ZONING DISTRICTS
§ 2-704
6. Off-street parking: design and appearance and land-
a. The physical characteristics of a pro- scaped areas are in excess of the
posed building are such that the minimum required.
likely uses of the property will re- 5. Off-street parking:
quire fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that a. The physical characteristics of the
the use of significant portions of the proposed building are such that the
building will be used for storage or likely uses of the
Y property will re-
other non-parking demand-generat-
of quire fewer parking spaces per floor
g purposes area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
b. Fast food restaurants shall not be building will be used for storage or
eligible for a reduction in the num- other non-parking demand-generat-
ber of off-street parking spaces. ing purposes;
7. Front setback: The reduction in front set- b. Convenience retail shall not be eligi-
back results in an improved site plan or ble for a reduction in the number of
improved design and appearance. off-street parking spaces.
N. Retail sales and service.
Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development fronts on but will not
involve direct access to a major arterial
street;
Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping ar-
eas in excess of the minimum re-
quired or improved design and ap-
pearance;
b.. The increased height will not reduce
the vertical component of the view
from any adjacent residential prop-
erty.
4. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
6. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
0. RV parks.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas;
2. The perimeter of the RV Park is screened
to a height of four feet by a landscaped
wall or fence so that headlamps from
automobiles in the off-street parking area
can not project into adjacent properties
and streets;
3. All outdoor lighting is designed and lo-
cated so that light fixtures do not cast
light directly on to adjacent land used for
residential purposes;
4. All waste disposal containers which serve
the use are located within a landscaped
enclosed structure.
5. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
6. Rear setback:
b. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
a. The reduction in rear setback does
not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
Supp. No. 16 CD2:63
§ 2-704
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
b. The reduction in rear setback re-
sults in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking, or improved de-
sign and appearance and landscaped
areas are in excess of the minimum
required.
P. Self storage.
1. Access doors to individual storage units
are located within a building or are
screened from view from adjacent prop-
erty or public rights-of-way by landscaped
walls or fences located no closer to the
property lines of the parcel proposed for
development than five feet.
2. The parcel proposed for development does
not abut land which is designated or used
for residential purposes.
3. The facades of the building in which the
individual storage units are located which
front on public roads are designed with
windows, cornices, retail sales and service
uses or other architectural features or
treatments.
4. Vehicular access to the parcel proposed
for development shall be by way of a local
or collector street. The local/collector street
shall not be located more than 100 feet
from an arterial street.
5. Off-street parking: The physical character-
istics of the proposed building are such
that the likely uses of the property will
require fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that the
use of significant portions of the building
will be used for non-parking demand gen-
erating purposes.
6. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
7. Rear setback:
a. The reduction in rear setback does
not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
b. The reduction in rear setback re-
sults in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking, or improved de-
sign and appearance and landscaped
areas are in excess of the minimum
required.
Q. Social /public service agencies.
1. The parcel proposed for development does
not abut any property designated as res-
idential in the Zoning Atlas.
2. The social/public service agency shall not
be located within 1,500 feet of another
social/public service agency.
3. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area and/or will not result in a building
which is out of scale with existing build-
ings in the immediate vicinity of the par-
cel proposed for development.
4. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
5. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
b. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking layout or im-
proved design and appearance and
landscaped areas are in excess of the
minimum required.
R. Telecommunication towers.
1. No telecommunication tower is located on
Clearwater Beach.
2. If the telecommunication tower is located
within a scenic corridor designated by the
City of Clearwater or a scenic noncommer-
cial corridor designated by the Pinellas
Planning Council, the applicant must dem-
onstrate compliance with the design cri-
teria in those designations.
3. The design and construction of the tele-
communication tower complies with the
standards in Article 3 Division 21.
Supp. No. 16 CD2:64
ZONING DISTRICTS
S. Vehicle sales l displays.
1. The gross floor area of enclosed buildings
is at least 4,000 square feet;
2. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas; .
3. The display of vehicles for sale shall be
located within an enclosed building;
4. The use of the parcel proposed for devel-
opment fronts on but will not involve
direct access to a major arterial street.
5. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area and/or width will not result in a
building which is out of scale with exist-
ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
6. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
7. Rear setback:
a. The reduction in rear setback does
not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
b. The reduction in rear setback re-
sults in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking, or improved de-
sign and appearance and landscaped
areas are in excess of the minimum
required.
T. Veterinary offices, grooming and boarding
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas;
The use of the parcel proposed for devel-
opment does not involve animal confine-
ment facilities that are open to the out-
side.
3. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area and width will not result in a build-
ing which is out of scale with existing
buildings in the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development.
§ 2-801.1
a. The reduction in side and/or rear
setback does not prevent access to
the rear of any building by emer-
gency vehicles.
b. The reduction in side and/or rear
setback results in an improved site
plan, more efficient parking, or im-
proved design and appearance and
landscaped areas are in excess of the
minimum required.
5. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
(Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6680-01,
§ 3, 4-5-01; Ord. No. 6928-02, §§ 15, 16, 5-2-02;
Ord. No. 7106-03, § 1, 9-18-03; Ord. No. 7413-05,
§ 8, 5-5-05; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 10, 12-15-05; Ord.
No. 7605-06, §§ 1, 2, 4-20-06)
DIVISION 8. TOURIST DISTRICT ("T")
Section 24301. Intent and purpose.
The intent and purpose of the gburist District
("T") is to provide a safe and attractive tourist
destination in the City of Clearwater with a full
complement of tourist accommodations and con-
venient access to goods and services.
Section 2-801.1. Maximum development po-
tential.
The Tourist District ("T") may be located in
more than one land use category. It is the intent of
the T District that development be consistent
with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as
required by state law. The development potential
of a parcel of land within the T District shall be
determined by the standards found in this Devel-
opment Code as well as the Countywide Future
Land Use Designation of the property. For those
parcels within the T District that have an area
within the boundaries of and governed by a spe-
cial area plan approved by the City Commission
and the Countywide Planning Authority, maxi-
mum development potential shall be as set forth
for each classification of use and location in the
approved plan. Development potential for the
4. Side and rear setback:
Errata CD2:64.1
2.3.3.5 COMMERCIAL CLASSIFICATION - CONT.
I I I
2.3.3.5.4 Category/Symbol - Commercial General (CG)
P ose - It is the purpose of this category to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or
appropriate to be developed, in a manner designed to provide community and countywide commercial
goods and services; and to recognize such areas as primarily consistent with the need, relationship to
adjoining uses and with the objective of encouraging a consolidated, concentrated commercial center
providing for the full spectrum of commercial uses.
Use Characteristics - Those uses appropriate to and consistent with this category include:
• Primary Uses -Office; Personal Service/Office Support; Retail Commercial; Commercial/ Business
Service; Transient Accommodation; Wholesale/Distribution (Class A);
Storage/Warehouse (Class A);
• Secondary Uses - Commercial Recreation; Residential; Residential Equivalent; Institutional;
Transportation/Utility; Recreation/Open Space; Research/Development; Light
Manufacturing/Assembly (Class A)
Locational Characteristics - This category is generally appropriate to locations in and adjacent to activity
centers where surrounding land uses support and are compatible with intensive commercial use; and in
areas in proximity to and with good access to major transportation facilities, including mass transit.
Traffic Generation Characteristics - The standard for the purpose of calculating typical traffic impacts
relative to an amendment for this category shall be 465 trips per day per acre.
Density/Intensity Standards - Shall include the following:
• Residential Use - Shall not exceed twenty-four (24) dwelling units per acre.
• Residential Equivalent Use - Shall not exceed an equivalent of 2.0 to 3.0 beds per permitted
dwelling unit at 24 dwelling units per acre. The standard for the purpose of establishing relative
intensity and potential impacts shall be the equivalent of 2.5 beds per dwelling unit.
• Transient Accommodation Use - Shall not exceed forty (40) units per acre.
• Non-Residential Use -Shall not exceed a floor area ratio (FAR) of.55, nor an impervious surface
ratio (ISR) of .90. The standard for the purpose of establishing relative intensity and potential
impacts shall be a FAR of .33 and an ISR of .68.
• Mixed Use - Shall not exceed, in combination, the respective number of units per acre and floor area
ratio permitted, when allocated in their respective proportion to the gross land area of the
property.
Other Standards - Shall include the following:
• Acreage Limitations - Institutional; Transportation/Utility Use - Shall not exceed a maximum area
of five (5) acres. Any such use, alone or when added to existing contiguous like use(s), which
exceeds this threshold shall require a plan map amendment which shall include such use and all
Countywide Plan Rules 2-29 August 8, 2005
contiguous like uses.
• Research/Development; Light Manufacturing/Assembly (Class A) Use - Shall be allowed in this
category only on the basis of and pursuant to local government standards which address, as a
minimum, the following criteria in relationship to the nature of the proposed use:
1. Neighboring uses and the character of the commercial area in which it is to be located;
2. Noise, solid waste and air quality emission standards;
3. Hours of operation;
4. Traffic generation; and
5. Parking, loading, storage, and service provisions.
E
i
Countywide Plan Rules
2-30
August 8, 2005
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576
May 16, 2006
CANNON HENSON
12510 PALOMINO CT
TAMPA, FL 33626
RE: FLD2005-11107 (Located at 2862 GULF TO BAY BLVD)
Dear : CANNON HENSON
There has been no activity with regards to your application, case number: FLD2005-11107 in the last
five (5) months. Please find attached comments related to this case that are still outstanding. Your
application will become WITHDRAWN unless these comments are addressed prior to:
Tuesday, June 13, 2006 (12:00 noon).
This will be your only notification.
Please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582 should you have any questions.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
John Schodder, Planner II
cc: File
6 Month No Activity Letter
0 41- 'IN a
May. 16 2006 08:26AM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94467656 May.16 08:25AM 00'56 SND 01 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF EY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
1:35 pm Case Number: FLD2005-1 l lu / -- 2862 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Owner(s): Scott Hudson
1.781.9 St Lucia Isle Dr
Tampa, Fl 33647
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Representative: Cannon Henson
12510 Palomino Ct
Tampa, Fl 33626
TELEPHONE: 727-641-5557, FAX: 727-446-7656, E-MAIL: No Email
Location: 0.42 acres locate at the northwest corner of the intersection of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Elizabeth Avenue.
Atlas Page: 291B
Zoning District: C, Commercial
Request: Flexible Development Approval for to allow a Vehicle Service Use in the Commercial Zoning District and
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per
Section 2-704.C.
Proposed Use: Vehicle service
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758
P O Box 8204
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I
Attendees Included:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
1 . 1. Provide signed and sealed Site Plan.
1 2. In accordance with Community Development Code Section 3-1701, if cost of remodeling
Building 2 exceeds 50-percent of it's assessed valuation, sidewalk shall be provided along
Elizabeth Avenue.
3. Provide dumpster enclosure in accordance with City Index # 701.
4. Parking that backs out into Elizabeth Avenue is not permitted (Community Development Code
Section 3-1402.C.)
5. Provide location of nearest fire hydrant.
6. Is building proposed to be sprinkled.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
1 . No Issues
Fire:
il I . Show location of fire hydrant 300' travel as hose lays for both buildings.PRIOR TO CDB
2. Widen entrance from Gulf to Bay to 24' width with 30' radius and provide 30' radius at other
entrances.PRIOR TO CDB
3 . Comply with NFPA 30A for repair garages, sloped floors to floor drains are required as is an oil
seperator, spray booth for bedliner coating, etc.PRIOR TO CDB
Harbor Master:
No Comments
Legal:
No Comments
Land Resources:
No Issues.
Landscaping:
1 . New uses. Any landscaped area serving a new use or a change of use shall satisfy the standards
of the landscape code, section 3-12.
Parks and Recreation:
No Comments
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 29
Stormwater:
1 . No Issues
Solid Waste:
No Comments
Traffic Engineering:
1 . Provide a site plan showing dimensions of parking stalls, drive aisles, and driveways.
2. Provide required number of disabled parking spaces compliant with Florida Accessibility
Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.1.2.
3. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section
100, Index No. 118)
4.Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public
sidewalk and to multiple buildings on site compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for
Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2.
5. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind
parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section
11-4.6.2.
6. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and access points.
(City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904).
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Planning:
1 . Clarify. How is the vehicle service use in harmony with the character of adjacent properties? The
gas station to the west and the single family dwelling to the north.
2. Re-Clarify. How will the vehicle service use does not discourage or hinder the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof?
3 . Clarify. How will the vehicle service use will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood? Expand on the enclosed environment and the spray on
bedliner process.
4. Clarify. How is the vehicle service use designed to minimize traffic congestion? How many
employees will be working at the vehicle service facility and where will they park? Where will
the customers vehicles be parked after the bedliners have been sprayed on?
5 . Clarify. How is the vehicle service use consistent with the community character of the immediate
vicinity?
6. Building elevations show four flags on top of building. Code allows a maximum of three per
parcel of land.
7. Clarify. Why don't the survey and site plan match?
8. Required Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) of 95 percent coverage of the parcel of land has been
exceeded. Five percent of the property will need to opened to meet this requirement.
9. Any parking area which is to serve a new use of land, shall satisfy the parking standards in
Article 3, Division 14.
10. Clarify. Expain how the redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise
impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards.
11 . Clarify. Explain how the vehicle service use, as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project is
compatible with the adjacent land uses. The gas station to the west and the single family
residence to the north are adjacent properties.
12. Clarify. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the vehicle service use with in the
comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
13. Clarify. How is a vehicle service use upgrading the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development?
14. Clarify. How is the site work creating a form and function that enhances the community
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole?
15. This application is insufficient to go on to the Community Development Board (CDB) without
the site improvements required due to the new use (vehicle service - spray on bedliners).
( Other:
lP No Comments
Notes:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 30
s •
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576
December 05, 2005
HENSON, CANNON
12510 PALOMINO CT
TAMPA FL 33626
RE: FLD2005-11107 LOCATED AT 2862 GULF TO BAY BLVD - HENSON, CANNON
Dear CANNON HENSON:
The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee
(PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLD2005-11107. These comments are generated
early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting
on December 8, 2005.
Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that may be generated at the DRC
meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to
Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting.
If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582.
Sincerely,
(?? - ?? O..
John Schodder
Planner I
Cc: File
•
1:35 pm Case Number: FLD2005-110- 2862 GULF TO. BAY 1 ~LVD
Owner(s): Scott Hudson
17819 St Lucia Isle Dr
Tampa, Fl 33647
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Representative: Cannon Henson
12510 Palomino Ct
Tampa, Fl 33626
TELEPHONE: 727-641-5557, FAX: 727-446-7656, E-MAIL: No Email
Location: 0.42 acres locate at the northwest corner of the intersection of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Elizabeth. Avenue.
Atlas Page: 291B
Zoning District: C, Commercial
Request: Flexible Development Approval for to allow a Vehicle Service Use in the Commercial Zoning District and
includes exterior renovation in excess of 25%, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per
Section 2-704.C.
Proposed Use: Vehicle service
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758
P O Box 8204
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I
Attendees Included:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
1 . 1. Provide signed and sealed Site Plan.
2. In accordance with Community Development Code Section 3-1701, if cost of remodeling
Building 2 exceeds 50-percent of it's assessed valuation, sidewalk shall be provided along
Elizabeth Avenue.
3. Provide dumpster enclosure in accordance with City Index # 701.
4. Parking that backs out into Elizabeth Avenue is not permitted (Community Development Code
Section 3-1402.C.)
5. Provide location of nearest fire hydrant.
6. Is building proposed to be sprinkled.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
No Issues
Fire:
1 . Show location of fire hydrant 300' travel as hose lays for both buildings.PRIOR TO CDB
2. Widen entrance from Gulf to Bay to 24' width with 30' radius and provide 30' radius at other
entrances. PRIOR TO CDB
3 . Comply with NFPA 30A for repair garages, sloped floors to floor drains are required as is an oil
seperator, spray booth for bedliner coating, etc.PRIOR TO CDB
Harbor Master:
No Comments
Legal:
No Comments
Land Resources:
I . No Issues.
Landscaping:
I . New uses. Any landscaped area serving a new use or a change of use shall satisfy the standards
of the landscape code, section 3-12.
Parks and Recreation:
No Comments
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 31
Stormwater: •
1 . No Issues
Solid Waste:
No Comments
Traffic Engineering:
I . Provide a site plan showing dimensions of parking stalls, drive aisles, and driveways.
2. Provide required number of disabled parking spaces compliant with Florida Accessibility
Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.1.2.
3. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section
100, Index No. 118)
4.Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public
sidewalk and to multiple buildings on site compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for
Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2.
5. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind
parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section
1.1-4.6.2.
6. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and access points.
(City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904).
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Planning:
1 . Clarify. How is the vehicle service use in harmony with the character of adjacent properties? The
gas station to the west and the single family dwelling to the north.
2. Re-Clarify. How will the vehicle service use does not discourage or hinder the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3 . Clarify. How will the vehicle service use will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood? Expand on the enclosed environment and the spray on
bedliner process.
4. Clarify. How is the vehicle service use designed to minimize traffic congestion? How many
employees will be working at the vehicle service facility and where will they park? Where will
the customers vehicles be parked after the bedliners have been sprayed on?
5. Clarify. How is the vehicle service use consistent with the community character of the immediate
vicinity?
6. Building elevations show four flags on top of building. Code allows a maximum of three per
parcel of land.
7. Clarify. Why don't the survey and site plan match?
8. Required Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) of 95 percent coverage of the parcel of land has been
exceeded. Five percent of the property will need to opened to meet this requirement.
9. Clarify. Parking, landscaping, and setbacks will be required to be brought into compliance with
current Code and will need to meet this criterion.
10. The request for a new use will require that the site parking and landscaping be brought into
compliance with current Code.
11 . Any parking area which is to serve a new use of land, shall satisfy the parking standards in
Article 3, Division 14.
12. Clarify. Expain how the redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise
impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards.
13. Clarify. Explain how the vehicle service use, as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project is
compatible with the adjacent land uses. The gas station to the west and the single family
residence to the north are adjacent properties.
14. Clarify. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the vehicle service use with in the
comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
15. Clarify. How is a vehicle service use upgrading the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development?
16. Clarify. How is the site work creating a form and function that enhances the community
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole?
Other:
No Comments
Notes:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 32
Dec. 05 2005 03:06PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94467656 Dec.05 03:05PM 01'34 SND 03 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
9:00 am Case Number: FLD2005-1 1 107 -- 2862 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Owner(s): Scott Hudson
17819 St Lucia Isle Dr
Tampa, Fl 33647
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Representative: Cannon Henson
12510 Palomino Ct
Tampa, FI 33626
TELEPHONE: 727-641-5557, FAX: 727-446-7656, E-MAIL: No Email
Location: 0.42 acres locate at the northwest corner of the intersection of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Elizabeth Avenue.
Atlas Page: 291B
Zoning District: C, Commercial
Request: Flexible Development Approval for to allow a Vehicle Service Use in the Commercial Zoning District and
includes exterior renovation in excess of 25%, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per
Section 2-704.C.
Proposed Use: Vehicle service
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, F133758
P O Box 8204
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I
Attendees Included:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
1 _ 1. Provide signed and sealed Site Plan.
2. In accordance with Community Development Code Section 3-1701, if cost remodeling of
Building 2 exceeds 50-percent of it's assessed valuation, sidewalk shall be provided along
Elizabeth Avenue right-of-way.
3. Provide dumpster enclosure in accordance with City Index # 701.
4. Parking that backs out into Elizabeth Avenue is not permitted (Community Development Code
Section 3-1402.C.)
5. Provide location of nearest fire hydrant.
6. Is building proposed to be sprinkled.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
1 , No Issues
Fire:
I . Show location of fire hydrant 300' travel as hose lays for both buildings.PRIOR TO CDB
2. Widen entrance from Gulf to Bay to 24' width with 30' radius.PRIOR TO CD
3. Comply with NFPA 30A for repair garages, sloped floors to floor drains are required as is an oil
seperator.PRIOR TO CDB
Harbor Master:
No Comments
Legal:
No Comments
Land Resources:
No Comments
Landscaping:
No Comments
Parks and Recreation:
No Comments
Stormwater:
1 , No Issues
(.tE?t6tA)5 sTlu_ To "1."6
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 13
0 1 4 0
Solid Waste:
No Comments
Traffic Engineering:
No Comments
Planning:
I . Building elevations show four flags on top of building. Code allows a maximum of three per
parcel of land.
2. Clarify. Why don't the survey and site plan match?
3 . Required Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) of 95 percent coverage of the parcel of land has been
exceeded. Five percent of the property will need to opened to meet this requirement.
Other:
No Comments
Notes:
.F-P-**J-t PACUB .r Cw L o-r I-6 v o
Ks Gfz-6-s s &vrF 6L-t Z A«G3')A
3v t ?. r? ? S F a R- F14-e
0
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 8, 2005 - Page 14
Clearwater
November 14, 2005
Cannon Henson
12510 Palomino Ct
Tampa, 17133626
OC 11, Y OF CLEfRWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W . MYC LEARW AT ER. C OM
RE: FLD2005-11107 -- 2862 GULF TO BAY BLVD -- Letter of Completeness
Dear Cannon Henson :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2005-11107. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is complete.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on December
08, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown
Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one
week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your
representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have
regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the
meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or
John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
John Schodder
Planner I
Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-1 1107 - 2862 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Nov. 14 2005 02:54PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94467656 Nov.14 02:53PM 00'55 SND 01 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #J04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
File Edit 'Vieke.) Inrert Format
- - - Tools Table
- - Window Help
_
d l ®, v? J - .: .. ...
®? 1 oo`eS 0 -
.?
me-, Net%,, Poman - 12 i B
U
± ?F
L T . . , 1 , 2 , . , , 3 , . . 4 . 7
Vehicle service means an activity conducted entirely within an enclosed structure primarily involved in
servicing or repairing of automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, boats, recreational vehicles and other similarly sized
vehicular or transport mechanisms or heavy machinery. Vehicle services include washing, waxing, changing
oil, tuning, installing mufflers or detailing, window tinting, shock absorbers, and painting.
7ehic/e service, limited means an activity conducted within a structure which primarily involves the
routine maintenance of automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, boats, and recreational vehicles. Limited vehicle
service includes only washing, waxing, changing oil, detailing, and window tinting.
7ehicle service, major means vehicle repairs which include engine repair's where the cylinder head, pan
or exhaust mainfold is removed-, steam cleaning of engines-, undercoating-, vehicle spray painting; auto glass
repair and replacement; repair and replacement of trans mis sion, differential, trans axles, shaft and universal
joints, wheel and steering linkages and assemblies; rebuilding and upholstering the interior of vehicles;
customizing, restoration or rebuilding of vehicles; chassis, frame, body, fender and bumper molding,
straightening, replacement and finishing; and repairs involving extensive welding, racing of engines or lengthy
i or overnight idling of engines.
Pehicle sales/displays means a business or commercial activity involving the display and/or sale or
ntal of automobiles, small trucks and vans, boats no more than 20 feet in length and other small vehicular or
ansport mechanisms and including vehicle service.
lrehicde sales/displays, limited means a business or commercial activity involving the display and/or sale
or rental of bicycles, mopeds, and motorcycles and excluding service of such vehicles.
Vehicle sa/es/dispdays, major means a business or commercial activity involving the display and/or sale
or rental of boat and marine vessels, recreational vehicles, heavy equipment, mobile homes, and other vehicular
or transport mechanisms and including vehicle service.
i. =-
Draw i AutoShape : A ? 0 (Sl A
s
2J
Page 37 Sec 1 37f 3^0 At 1,5" Cn ? 4 Col 1 51 IF7
Skirt "; Inbox - Microsoft OU.,. Tidemark: Advantage r Clearwater F! Comm,,. I ®?ART08 - ARTICLE... ti - 1;19 PM
Clearwater
November 03, 2005
Cannon Henson
12510 Palomino Ct
Tampa, Fl 33626
OCITYOF CLE#RWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W . MYC LEARW AT ER. C OM
RE: FLD2005-11107 -- 2862 GULF TO BAY BLVD -- Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Cannon Henson :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2005-11107. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments.
1. Provide an estimated project value for the redevelopment of the entire project. What is it
going to cost you to make the improvements?
Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development
review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed
complete. Please resubmit by Wednesday, November 9, 2005 (12:00 Noon).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or
John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
John Schodtler
Planner I
Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-11107 - 2862 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Tra0m i o-n Report
Date/Time
Local ID
Local Name
Company Logo
11- 3-05; 2:12PM
7275624796
This document was con+irmed.
(reduced sample and details below)
Document Size Letter-S
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LLrwater
November D3, 2005
Cannon Henson
1251 D Palomino Ct
Tampa, F133626
RE: FLD2005-11107 - 2862 GULF TO BAY BLVD - Letter of Incompletencss
Dear Cannon Henson :
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
lOD SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLFiARWAT6R, FLORIDA 33756
TEL6PHON6: (727) 562567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W.MYCLEARWATERCOM
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the DepartmmCa filing system and assigned the
ease number. F1.D2OD5-I 1107. After a preliminary review of the submitted dac rots, staff has
determined that the applicatm is Incomid with the following comments.
1. Provide an estimated project value for the redevelopment of the entire project What is it
going to coat you to make the improvements?
Section 4202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development
review action shall be taken until the deficiencies am corrected and the application is deemed
complete. Please resubmit by Wedneaday, Novembar9, 2005 (12:00 Noon).
If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact twat 727-562-0547 or
John.Schodder@mycleatwater.com
Sincerely yours,
john Schodder
Planner I
re¢v oJrma yfamv,-nnraoxnrm-2a Cr 70RArNrvo
Total Pages Scanned - 1 Total Pages Confirmed 1
No. Doc Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Mode Comments Results
1 44 94467656 11- 3-05; 2:11PM 22" 1/ 1 EC CP 28.8
Notes
EC: Error Correct RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote MB: Receive to Mailbox
BC: Broadcast Send MP: Multi-Poll PG: Polling a Remote Pl: Power Interruption
CP: Completed RM: Receive to Memory DR: Document Removed TM: Terminated by user
HS: Host Scan HP: Host Print FO: Forced Output WT: Waiting Transfer
HF: Host Fax HR: Host Receive FM: Forward Mailbox Doc. WS: Waiting Send
0 0
Subject Property -Front Parking Lot.
Subject property -Freestanding
Signage.
• •
Subject Property -rear building.
• •
Subject Property -Rear parking area.
• •
Property to the East - S&M Truck
World.
i
•
Property to the East -Anchor Signs.
Property to the East.
LF?_ -
•
Property to the East.
0 •
Property to the East.
•
t
Property to the North -Single Family
Residential (zoned Commercial).
r? !
Property to the West -Gas Station.
1
0
E
l
Property to the South -Restaurant.
r I R
1 Z IV
? I?
. e 1
r
?E
'' e
s i
F
_ .t
f I
1
f 1_
k
C,
- P •, •
. L l h?Rlt ?
?w
• ?
W
F ; 1[
r; A
`F ?.
4? p
E '.
Aerial Map
Owner: Hudson, Scott Case: FLD2005-11 107
Site: 2862 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property
Size(Acres): 0.484
Henson, Cannon
PIN:
17-29-16-00000-130-3100
Atlas Page: 291 B
S:\Planning Department\C D 8\forms and shells\Map request forms2003\FLD Map request form.doc
I - I
?
_ ---
-- ---- r
1 _J 214
I
?
l? i--5p0 ' 3p
I1 I r 1 209 I J
,1 r---
---I
L-- I r-' 213F
,i L
- i `---I
304
r-- `- 216
I I
I-• LI
?
r
i
14
1 ; I I --' mole »
i-J ' I
-7
r---L
-, 308 Q 09 1_l i I
340 - -r I - -ri h'S J -_--I I -
--I L
1 I 1 _
-L
3 L
O 1
I I
1a_I
MDR
f I r4
388
W 321 r_ -
-- I--- -
T- L
`__r 1 ,
r---I r
31
I
3?T-?
Q S
? I-- r--,
-, - r-- J
t r---
1 1 I --I L
-
X I 1
I r
I L I
r -
1
1 7 I
-
345 I---I __'
I
I -1 I L_r? L__
r--- 1 r
`
-- i
_-320 321 i ''y+2
r' , --1 1 __
F- 1 ?_, rI I I e I
-- -- -? r?
_ I
324
i- 325 3?? L__.! `11 `_.S
r 1:2 I----r (- I
,, r
-?0 _
--,
i -- I
J 1
L
F I W i
j r_,
,--- }
L __
LJ --_I Y? S - i
`I l , r--,
I ? 1 I
I___J _
I
1 1
`---I I---? , I
I--_I I
400
I i ----'
401
407
-----, 1 I?
., I 5
-
I
I
4
I
404
r__
I I
'
r _
L r
1
I I
I
? I
1 1
I
r I
I- I
---I -_ II r
, I ?
_ L-?^ i?
r-,
rl
2810 413 1
I I ? r _ ;
I m L------ -' --- -'
m^ o I r1
H
N
v 1
I
m
m p
p W
GULF-TO-BAY BLVD
N N ? N I aD I
I
' I I I
I 1 I
I
__
\\ I
L-,-J I
`: \? \-?; \\
111 , \
\\ \/
1
r
/ 1 i
i
;
? II
DR
.
Zoning Map
Owner. Hudson, Scott Case: FLD2005-1 1 1 07
Site: 2862 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property 0.484
Size(Acres):
Henson, Cannon PIN: 17-29-16-"00-130-3100
Atlas Page: 291 B
S:\P?anning Department\C D B\forms and shells\Map request forms2003\FLD Map request form.doc
Sw
/ aBneRO nEAVE
re
ON ?
URGAODOW
" AVE
% LFE
f10'Yf ARE
mFOewiucu g
a ?? m (.7
BLl_?
DREW sr
??
u air u
tg
Cambnaye Clr. 2
91 Ob,Blena
Cbeny rt
M
gr ty
Q 9y E
VIRONIA
AVE JOHNS PARKWAY
"'b a KENTU KY
Q
e a
w
G ?q
]
mufs
ao? m DOM WO SIRFFi
rc
LLF TO BAY BLVD
SR 00 g
`S
PROJECT
SITE $ y?
SEVI a_VD
PEJtRCE OR J
II?PIC HLIB CA
Location Map
Owner. Hudson, Scott Case: FLD2005-11107
Site: 2862 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property 0.484
Size(Acres) :
PIN: 17-29-16-00000-130-3100
Henson, Cannon
Atlas Page: 291B
S:\Planning Department\C D B\forrns and shells\Map request forms2003\FLD Map request form.doc
-
I
I I 214 'iy
L-1 r--3po
1
301
r j 1
2619 I
-1-
L r_- --
---i ;---I
1
I L
I
`
J ;
-- ttt
t-
f ,
2131 ---
-
? I
_
-
304 r?r 216
1 ; 1 217 `L
j I_' --- I
_- 1 _
-308 Q ?00 I-t I 1
F-1 -,i ---I I- I I
i i _
i -I
I - -
-
?
--- I
r
312
t 4
1 7
321
t :
i _
_
I
?-
--?
4
386 +1 r' `- I
1 I
31
F- x
3?T `;
L
Q I--? r--,
r-L r , -
t--Z
r--1 I I ? ---I L
, t r
i L_ i = 346 t
_ 320 321 , 3t2 W 347 i
--t
32
326
?
L--'r
L---r
y,
I I
' , I
I
---
I ,
*a
ched
-- -
I-- '
r
I
i I, I -
400 !?
4dl?
? 1
1
1
? :.... 1 ,
401
404 407
r--
I ! Aut
----
omotive
! r, 11 6 r--?
L- a I 1
I
I I _ I r--a
I I 4 I I r
1 1 I , I
t-? ,--
--,
rl I
2810 413 I
Servic 1
e St4iop --- - I I I II 1 .i I
-- --- ---- -' ;
1--
°NI
1
1 ?
L
u? Reta 1?ales &
CV a 28 ti
t_I NI L___I N N N ? t_ _?
GULF-TO-BAY BLVD
?j co
N
N
,--
I I
-- i Retail Sale & Service
K
`
I est iSrant
1 I
I
Nurfs Hom?A - .tr
Attached, D!wellin?s
I--J
I I
!
i /[ !t
M1 i-
1 L--
`"I
f r % 1 II '
1
Existing Use Map
Owner. Hudson, Scott Case: FLD2005-1 1 1 07
Site: 2862 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property 0.484
Size(Acres):
PIN: 17-29-16-00000-1 30-3100
Henson, Cannon
Atlas Page: 291 B
S:\Planning Department\C D B\forms and shells\Map request forms2003\FLD Map request form.doc
Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 17 29 16 00000 130 3100 Page 2 of 6
1 / 2 / 10 / 00000 / 130 / 3100
22-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:42:39
Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales
HUDSON, SCOTT OBK: 09808 OPG: 1119
17819 ST LUCIA ISLE DR
TAMPA FL 33647-2715
EVAC: Non-EUAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 2862 GUL F TO BAY BLUD
of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 268.08
2004
:
sales from 2003 -
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 8 11,997 9,808}1,119 340,000 (Q) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { )
oooo: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { )
2005 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 462,500 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000
Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 462,500 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000
Historic Exem: 0
Taxable: 462,500 Agricultural: 0
2004 Tax Information
District: Cu Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View:
05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
05 Taxes: 10, 747. 21
1) 0 x 0 10. 00 21,000. 00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
10, 747.21 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
Without any exemptions,
2005 taxes will be
10, 747.21
Short Legal N 21OFT OF S 270FT OF E 100FT OF W 830FT OF SW
Description 114 OF HE 1/4 L
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11/22/2005
Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 17 29 16 00000 130 3100 Page 3 of 6
Property and. Land. _"Use _Code descriptions
. Building I
. Building-2
Building #1
17 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 130 / 3100 :01
22-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:42:38
Commercial Card 01 of 2 Improvement Type: Shopping Center
Property Address: 2862 GULF TO BAY BLUR Prop Use: 321 Land Use: 11
S?ruc?ural E1?m+E:n?s
Foundation Continuous Footing
Floor System Slab on Grade
Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco
Height Factor 0
Party Wall None
Structural Frame None
Roof Frame Bar Joist/Rigid Fran
Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps
Cabinet & Mill Average
Floor Finish Carpet Combination
Interior Finish Drywall
Total Units 0
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 12
Bath Tile None
Electric Average
Shape Factor Rectangle
Quality Average
Year Built 1,965
Effective Age 25
Other Depreciation 0
Function Depreciation 0
Economic Depreciation 0
Sub ArE3as
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1.00 4,860 7) .00 0
2) Canopy .25 750 8) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
F?atur s
COmm(--r4--1a1 Ex-trza
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 4000SF 1.50 4,000 6,000 6,000 999
2) FENCE 11.00 60 660 530 1,998
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 6,530
Building #2
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11/22/2005
Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 17 29 16 00000 130 3100
Page 4 of 6
17 / 20 / 10 / 00000 / 130 / 3100 :02
22-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:42:38
Commercial Card 02 of 2 Improvement Type: Offices
Property Address: 2862 GULF TO BAY BLVD Prop Use: 321 Land Use: 11
Structural Elcmcnts
Foundation Continuous Footing
Floor System Slab on Grade
Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco
Height Factor 0
Party Wall None
Structural Frame None
Roof Frame Bar Joist/Rigid Fram
Roof Cover Built Up/Metal}Gyps
Cabinet & Mill Average
Floor Finish Carpet Combination
Interior Finish Drywall
Total Units 0
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 8
Bath Tile Hone
Electric Average
Shape Factor Rectangle
Quality Average
Year Built 11965
Effective Age 15
Other Depreciation 0
Function Depreciation 0
Economic Depreciation 0
Sub Aromas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area i.00 2,J25 7) . 00 0
2) Canopy .25 48 8) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
COmmBrc1a1 Extra F4B atures
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 800SF 1.50 800 1,200 11200 999
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 1,200
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
[-*]R Fit F+-]FqFq
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11/22/2005
Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 17 29 16 00000 130 3100
Page 5 of 6
YDA% F, = L-0 L-t A?. b E
LI?A:BET 317
0 c- j 2,
A8E
385
E LIZ
380P
15/2601 -EtJZAB
5 ? ?{ ?pJ
A 4 d D- i ,-'*+'in4
r^ R
I'0
i 0 400 135
``0 ?e B gABH
ABE f ?
100 FLiZA^,TN
?- 1,3v 0
135
-GULF 2T2
Q FD
1.03 Ac(c) cu - t5j "6 QA 0
G SQL F
Ln 11.1
y Q.j
e -Jl) 100 7.5 75
? BAY
19
E43546 T
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
2571
GULF-
TG
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11/22/2005
Pinellas CoLinty Property Appraiser Information: 17 29 16 00000 130 3100 Page 6 of 6
14
g
?
a f
w 7 .y'£' at
-
, xw
- s ?. ate- ?' ?yy
Awx
1
a Ax
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
Back to Search Page
An explanation of this screen
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11/22/2005
VA i
swtttflun
rim-Cc
Subject Property - Front Parking Lot.
Subject Property - rear building.
FLS2005-1.1107
2862 Gulf To Bay Boulevard
Subject property - Freestanding Signage.
Subject Property - Rear parking area.
1 of 4
,.;; -
A
r
rt:
i
Property to the East
S&M Truck World.
Property to the East.
FLS2005-11107
2862 Gulf To Bay Boulevard
Property to the East - Anchor Signs.
Eft -
S
Property to the East.
2 of 4
Property to the North - Single Family
Residential (zoned Commercial).
Property to the West - Gas Station. Property to the South - Restaurant
FLS2005-11107
2862 Gulf To Bay Boulevard
3 of 4
Property to the East.
Property to the South - Bay-view
Gardens.
REA& 15ulLPI N & in
CrA3 VwrifoN
n5
0
00
0 °
by ?: ?? s s
73
C?
- s
3..
?Rojo ?v SI-r ?
0
EV-STING- 51G•N Ff.-6107 BuItv1N(r #1
Now +74W
a? 1,71 M,
049#SWR A% WMM L,*""
eti
lip
$40" AM tit (tAxi
ww "W"
'PAOCOW w I. w I
tll
a?
0
H lcT ..
P o 014" --)
a
a
?INEX) ,
p?rb _ --
taw aM. rw?
a" "Wom
FI
z
C
0
CJf
Q
CD
C
41z"
W- J4
er«a ? fb •re