Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2005-07075
Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, a a Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 C1' SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION (,15 SUBMIT 14COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including(IS 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans L 2DS Z SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ AV ?7 ??o s? fJ 74 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ORIGINAL Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Cod/e? Section 4-202.A)/? p APPLICANT NAME: KOi'1-f IE ?,<}MIl-y Ryz;rmegs"110 CIO ALzA I me-, MAILING ADDRESS: 1 Za l.ouotr 0- („EA2L,3A-T 1- 33•--7S(p--(pi+-7 PHONE NUMBER: C?2'-1) 4q-2-.-O-718 FAX NUMBER: C-721 ) , T1 Z34 p? ALAtA ROPME ) RALPH RoP4% , PROPERTY OWNER(S): R o'P+IIE 'FAMI?y Pr112Tn1ERS ?1?P CECC-UA ISIGIMCH C4AC-(Z'1L CpNCyJ? (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Zo"tS ArA&sASiO Flk ESiolnwr. Ov ALFA W14SlLkL:r1tSC-) COP, P, MAILING ADDRESS: I y-Z?3 W` ITT ????r" , ?Ct42c ?rA7C-t2 , -33'7Sh PHONE NUMBER: ( -7) L43-b-7 I g FAX NUMBER: 44:7 ° 2- 3Vo CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 243o GiU LF-TO - ?!aY GLV C-Lm& W LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C SEE A?" r"A C.I-1C>) CSEE S --LRNJO/ (if not listed here, please note the loc tion of this document in the submittal) (?? IUL f PARCEL NUMBER: S Z JiO ©©fa0 O 3C? ©T w J i 0 61-- PIAft1! UF. I SV PARCEL SIZE: O. 9l;0 A C12E5 413?-7 9" 4 x` (acres, square feet) r PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): `)e' i 1 CLE SaU (? Use tS7?/?1?? BU I L-O ANC ? 9wo SF (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): APMWA1, O'f 06" I CLE S& ICE USCG VIA <OMP- 14f; -+ Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) APp?IC TI(3t?. NMj CA,.1-r R?Z(b'S&S lb Meer wm ?6 Petri t2C-iD G+?eb IS IRT ???If4cl I.S On s? /?f?t.tcA?Y r+116'1C-3S Tv U1061 o e Sri6 By WIn G S-rM wATM--rR -A-TM 6r\1T, 61 ?6&1 ACC- BBL ?S AA D i M K60 C? ACC:E-S . 1 (5EE ?F7TA CH C> &3Arf"uk-TI\/E o V- *<e& tE7%-Ts ) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES.'i«ilS APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT, OR A PR documents) F L RIGHTS (TDR), A PR VIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT r( ?T ) SI I I J!! rN? YES NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) t? i/ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAn dI'f RISQ11 R1 NERIHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located "T}1E R"POSE!> 0644ICLE Sc VIcE use WIU_ 0CCL12. W11- M 43 RtA &K ISTIASC)i gL!)G 1:Z/2M62.L4 U-rILAZ-19> AS A 6001 SHtf BY AMKICA-A MoTo2S A?W3 LA-r62, LoKAY IMOO&Z C~. -TTAG f"ftEb LAS C- Whir o? 1o+.+J62. 114-r6-,1& iTi I I'1 Cu aD IM(--) i?CfaSToM I I& IAA UE+AICtC-S 0 W L Y. -rHG USI? IS SUR(ZwN0&D $]/ AtITo REPA1(2 - FA I! Ik-I-rl 2_ The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly "T+i aieko Pthereof. LASC, I S A +Ec sTo21 CAL. L4S E one Tq6 aw-C-?2Ty w6sr of -r"G R&:Tecr t s A ro 2. Au -ro Rte} 2- .A q o To -qE C r i s q oimt C.C-b Aun qw;r, fi-? b 6_e ik ., T;t C- P2oPoSE5!> uSe I S L_C?S f4T6\iSE Ar(D WIUr W No W A\' EATS HiiQDK#tMCE -M p?VE-LOPMC-n?-r CF /Vb-,1-AC64T EAVD 1 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed i -THE ,mooPoSe> LASE w Il.L t Br- WS-rbR.I cA A Y -TUC sAVAE W ITSf 1 E55Cn2 IniT6&iSoY , AA P-> WILL CALtSE Nb IfAPAC.TS To I.IEI6H&ARCQ0 RGALTH 9 SAES' 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. t TE 192a1POSE0 LA SE kLIU. )AAJC 0th 6,4- /!A/ CC F20v^-1 Ki L MC2 AVE , CZ) EX ITS To K I L,&A fL , A t ID i WrC-&NAt- CROSS A CCESS To Gut F-To - GAY Ar,?b 5ii'tl>` STieE6T TI{& P(Lo E r--r 2? SCE BE TG2 LP(rl DA IAl-liGZAS A F> I p > i 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. `TiV E 1A&(a5&D DEOELoPM6\1T fl2Z1%5ES AGCC-S,S I IAfJ 1DSCA PI, , 4 6- ?CIA6C t 9Tca2M - IATeL I A?69a)6mcv AtS To -W i s 14(STo2/CAL, Lt S WTo D106 Seimz_ FI-MM THE AIMuIJ rf( C{fA,2ACTC-rt- CFTffC- A61E14,6&ZHOlD/ LLW/ C6 MC-MA 14 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, --rk a Ro?Eropertie CT S P6 S SCCU2? 1?12?'//JEj A?Z Cct Sra/`' a 0C2g1 C(C-S 7-6 466'1 ? A-ni0 i3ue IL y- > RzAk V iCLO. PfLL VC4IaE SC-a-06C- AffiJf7fES WILL OlMutz WSI& --rqE 6oS'7rAJC 9 mo S? ?I-bG. DwRS FOR o6ol CL6 c-wW -e a(T y3iILc ?E FAcI IIG AI0 AY FRON RES I r 7t.?c, MMZ/b-, &W 066 . &u2S OF 0f&2A?i a?J UN l C ISC--PW O Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Tr- AN;?-t> C-r{?C1? - EM\J%CE rUSiv t5 "(S-1155aI CAL DtS Tit t S P12z%'UY f r'4t> I ?S TH E J L4 Se C-XISTtr3G iDGJ6-opm&rr of -Me ExISTA6. $L41t_DIr?1C ir4 AeC0(Z0Atk&LN CrrY DC--0C ZPMC,n1T S-MICA90S IS i M P24CVC4L W iNau.T h1,ASol-LM& 06V I T O-Ak; 7O A C?ll> STca?2A-tt.>?7E?L.T/?AT?lC?t7; f?Lt?, /N ?,2/a?2 C, ? SI S , C. J i Z 01 Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • ORIGINAL 2. Thydevelopment of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site, with the improvements.) A8U'r-r1O(; AUFM_-rY UA+-LIES 1 CRCSISE 1. "6_J i A4er clJC_MC_f4rS 0 C'Ct-12- . ' 1HC A?P" AnAisaR s M,?. cr JAwE `S bZ i, Sew . THE ?iPoS?4L iHC ?n? to ILL U f ITF THE Oc.ACrY 51-tf S'(i4?JTi 1, "?CIA QILL tAt-406u616N 1 p4Qk VSE ITS MrLi[.r--T VAuAE sZo o ." T4 C- RGAt_ EsTf4TE a AAA-r E-a\OoYM -ToIDAY. 3. The usbs within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. "TIC (blSC-mo kk*ktC?f SC-?UiCE USF 15 oT?{12 u31 SE Ac ct + r4 7:F-IeT OD fQ i nth' ebCT, AfW) HAS act HAimai cft-l At Lax)c-f> AT -MIS t_ACATi off, 4. The s or mix of use within the comprehensive infll redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. usse / ? „'1-{-lc- &Pes `o O"luk L1?1? uSE Re&W-S A L6KC-1 &Cq SIAOP A-NO IS. AUK &,T _T_0 'A To F " Au-ro cAae (e6OA W) A-Yp AO,1A1\1Q& Attu OVZ:rS RCPA i E um,o 3coKL-nlrJ [E Pit-t ecT y4iTN y6i4TC-,r2 /niT&OS1TY c A -r 1=-s 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in t e C't o Clea ater ; .f S A-M&VI r ! w 6 7_.D L(G X TW C-KIS OAJ -T-44 C_ 3u + L?i?? Ta R S, M rL,}rL u Sf2 be- Cu sTav is . -ryc2F is Am o7N62 vo3 LWA-Per,J r-dVt !?>C cus-ra,"s 4L" ouL -=To -6 , A41? o6ES 7-AIIE L ©C f o 6*Z_ VIABLE 0-W&L USES . 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7_4E A&II2666 u seF, wiu- 4u-ow iae_ AccESS) P*Zk1A[6 J STo21t ef--rraf I1?, s18CW/tL1? A&I AhA!® Lr9rJJSe?1(?inlr uP?iP OA! _Mis Pfil?C?. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 'Tk- A2,N%5C-1D use 1FA'1ZDtJ6fl, zv1u_ & on?E gTti° etas)? T MAKiAJ6 JT S a/LCE"L" C61-?> E CbM RJ4Arr A17J8 W/LL IWOV10E AtJ EX?JMJOL6 F SIM/!47/L Y1?_?6_JecT$ i? WOA) - CW F&tMit AK) (YCEA1'.A lUoS. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. o?G?SrR?T MaKJAX IS REQUE&?V_> /;a(2 AyqO12zU/rL $qW-/_-> OAf -rK Di m /CT ?, ' rMOS O-F I.S SAES /viaS ffiCH Vjt4rZS TUSIOFIE!.'?> 61-EC-6 6A1 '_M6 /[1SrdZ/C4 L S PTE USE e?PJD At??ACC-,? u sC-S . ? 9.9? ? Bu?N2 ?S ?9c so REQuC-?? AC6N G N1-fef LCY STKEET, wf[6-ZC- NO 6UFI:?- QOSIS am 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. fiCr_ PO- s7REOT MC/A-V; wIL4- _& I/W1664D V14 03 ) vu1S//)6 S04CES 6A1 S17t OR_ . PL-US (I/) /A r62_1a2 G/W6C S6'2-L#C -4? &OACES . A16 &Y*26- PA/ i' C, wILL at x' ur2cyn . 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. f HE ('noPa5CO Rzs C-0- AscreL S /JoT tti Er?fF2 cvg:?- /W&Ser-- ?rS'Y2lC?? ] P ill 2... OWWW 1 1 r LWV U i Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 200 ORIGINAL E.' STORMWATER PLAN SUB'TTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involy addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance witl the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemptioi to this requirement. ( seie? cSKcer 4-. GP-Ac),&A R} * n rca w?? Q_ . e., ,-ry O tsicpsS) If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. A Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) IE SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? REE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, Y/A cluding drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; l? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; (Co ew- sw:er of PAS) ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to N/14 the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in / accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Al .4 GRADING PLAN, as applicable; NIA ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); N/A ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) North arrow, D t Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; ( CoJf?-%fC--Ir ) Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; 1i4 Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; _? All required setbacks; ( SM 04rA) PLAN All existing and proposed points of access; PCA?S All required sight triangles; ($ 17-e g (ft??OSCA ) "` ?r A Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen f trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _ Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater VI/ - Location of existing public and Nate utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, m`nhotles a?nd"l 1slatbAL ' and water lines; ? All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; I Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; (,/43E(&b C? 41 &1 Ff C- -? ? Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; /U/ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Y Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: V/ Land area in square feet and acres; i Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; e 6 -06 CATA ? Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _? Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 21" REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) and color rendering if possible; NAo FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional' information on site plan: (,,,IA; C69S T7f-*J One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); - Structural overhangs; - Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) C]f LANDSCAPE PLAN: _ All existing and proposed structures; ? Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; i/ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); _? Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and % protective measures; _? Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Y IRRIFJUL 2-7 2M I PLANNING & O ? 3UCE Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearw&TY=? - +? -`- I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLATSUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) F2equired in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. 2" BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. Ga/ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). N Ly Oeo' Reduced signage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. WALL- 516AIS o 6L-bc-4 1 Gte- Ilk-n"s K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway gs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. oil. Traffic Impact Study is not required. I5 * TION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND ONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY O CUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, ac wledge that all representations made in this application are true an accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City represen tives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. of ?X 7 2M STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS <W1 Swo 5 nd subscribed 1a before a ? this day of A.D. 20-Ob to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as icl tifcation. J 1 ?, 6- Nof`??ublic,, My commission expires: "'fT.,r , re=, 4 0) ment Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Co ML,Aon # DD 17=7 gpim Dec.1.2.005 A&ft > Ca4 bm . AFFibAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. • lam' I ' ' J Lo Pro pe N rty Owner r 5 ?T L- q ?? /?/ S Property Owner FbvN/C Property Owner A?/ Z Y#/ P Property Owner w STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: Notary Public D S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development revieMflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc JUG 2;7 Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater Sep 14 05 04:07p ,,,Copley Design Associates p ?' T Planning and. Development Services Cle 100 r% ? I South Myrtle Avenue y'? L ?r Clearwater, Florida 33756 _ Telephone: 727-662-4567 O Fax 727562-4576 D SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED APPLICATION LX SUBMT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including }bided site plan CASE #• FL[) Z005 - 0-1 DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION! OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: I SOUTH- I VVES'ti EAST: I COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQU "A"NTS (Revise! 911WMI) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 41001) C/e U60N Ar.04ASre APPUCANT NAME. ROPO I I` I;W I L_`( TR txVr C'(o At_$A Cbt-1Su1L_T11J C? (SM&A f 04 MAILING ADDRESS: 14 bn? C?, o u V2 T STMerr I C LC,?-2wA-rf& 0 FL 33756 PHONE NUMBER: (-n-7) q( ?13 - C>-71 q FAX NIAIE8ER. PROPERTY OWNERIS): SAME As MPL l CA-*T') (Must 11MkIde ALL owners) r ?t, AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) Sir UACC L A cto to e wit, MAILING MMRESS: 141416 C bu(&r S-r. Ct.*j awAT&t , FL X37 S(o PHONE NUMBER: {-7) "[ `t 4 9 " 1000 10??FAX NUMBER: ('77-7) T `f' 6 - ! o 7 o The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application fear development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sectionslelevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information In addition to the information provided on this worksheet: 1. Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as apart of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development The Landscape is in concert with the local development maximizing Landscape treatment and enhancing architectural themes- §eQ ,CieakW ?6r + e e<%sktsn, 9 ,000 SF bu%16%^g orb _?be res r b4 the yQrcel. Thecc??e , -H,e Appu cao%4- IS requeiA-t nck a tlartgnee payerwetnt setbaeys-s ev\& I d 10' b?4ke?S L'4muice d z ??? - ?o -'gain 81v d a? d 1?(trkeT /?yQ,nue. ??en ?-ages as Page I of r -kalred A-ft +\ke eA'%s6nc Eln4-e' crelse - Rey - A- Car 4aeiti 1-4A 6,x,e 4-t. 1.eyk\? loth d ,ng l ease eo,n s}roe i his . 727-785-4017 p.1 Sep 14 05 04:07p 2. 3. ,Copley Design Associates 727-785-4017 p.2 0 OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The Landscape treatment has been maximized on the property without jeopardizing drainage patterns, underground or overhead utilities, and the function of the building. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. Lighting will be controlled to be respectful of neighboring properties. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in fhe Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Landscape treatment is designed to give years of benefits without the disruption of building function, drainage and utilities. Rige 2 01, 3 Sep 14 05 04:07p Copley Design Associates 727-785-4017 p.3 I* 4. Property Values. The landscape0tment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program wilt have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. _ The Landscape treatment will benefit value by providing aesthetically pleasing views while providing climate control for building and parking areas. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parsell proposed for development is located. (V 1A Please return checklist for review and verification. S. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is tru ct. Ct?G !ftrly ow r Pr rty owner STATE OF FLORIDA, CULri ry OF PPMLLAS Before roe the undersigned, an officer duty commissioned by the taws of the State of Florida, on this personally appeared Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that My Commission Expires: S: application torrrtsJdevelopment review/comprehensive landscape program appiication.dac day of been first duly sworn Notary Public ot?P4e ; Michael B. Steeves Commission #DD258944 Expires. Oct 17 2007 OF Bonded Thni Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. Page 3of3 i INS? 4R 9 1t?9!3 7 n 4 f - ' APR 14 , 1994. 5:0$PM : jIAMCO FORM a CU1111TY ??• )PINELLAO R 86322 'PG. 326 r - - _ oFF.REC:-bK s11R ?M![- ?El?j E:eciattd rhir 11 dnr df ?`. Pril . A. D. w 94 by PAUUD ff? , to AtaN-ROPfQE, It]?IPtt RoPFtIE, .CI7Ci.T BU= and CIffiItXL' ' O3ElM, equally, poslof fact address is C/Jg'Fn w J.' Com, a"QUire, 0/0 Hassett,' Cohen,. 0 Beiti3ansn; . o Attorneays at Iaay r. Ial-, 4A-: ? e i i i. 1., r _ 411 •R '? .. • : was D E •• C4 C4 second pay: 900-HB!l wnd--Drive, SAte 990, Atlanta, Geoi-4ia ,30328 _ (Miere.er wed Irene nenw "dint prN and :'..d pane" &.g isdrde simuder srA p6rd, heirs, hpl =:t%..-,d Mniaw d?e?, Mad the wa ws tad Miler d catpinti..0,, wow k's, dw ewtral . irea) - - • WllR[iiEiN? That the sold JIM par13,,,jor and in corwideraiton of the sum of t y - In hhnd-patd by 16 sand second party. the recelpi whereol-is hereby acknowwilol, does hw ebrmmllse. se• lease and quit-ClpLn unto 16 saki second party forever, nil the right, title, Inwrest, eldest and dimand which the said f iro party has in and in the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, Ntuate, lying and being in the County of - ..Pinellas Slate ej ' Florida to-wit: All eS-the grafittarrs interest in and to: t From the'SW corner of the [3E 1/4-of Section 181 Township. 29?'Sbuth; Range 16 East, ruri S 899 '40-.- 55".,East,'along the. •UIDNO East-West center line of said Section 18,•200:0 ft. for P.0'.B..,.thence continue S ,890 40' 554t &got,: slang the East- 7 ' Wost,• center line ,of 'said ?ectfon. 18,•2 -324.57, ft. to - the center -line.-of Kilmer Aye. ; ; :thence N 1° 0,11 28" East', = -- a along. the center line of Kilmer -Ave. , • 330-.03 fait. to the- - T---= _ South .line- of Gulf • to Bay Acres First Addition ,as recgr-ded, r ` id Plat Book 52, Pate: 55,:•'eLf -therPs4blic -Records of Pitidllas Coitnty; Florida; thence' N 890, 41!• 18" West; a]lDn the South A - G line of 1liaiei Gulf to Bay Acres. First 'Ad?t?n a__ 34.50 ft:. thence S lot 01" 13" Want , - 330.02. ft. to the, P.0, D * ' Lea a• the. South 50.0- ft. and t'he'- East 30.0 ft,' `for, road: fight-of . Q way. 'idle quitclaim dewed Confirms the'grantores•intention to_ convey all of her interest, in. the above-described parcel, in her deed dated D4oet46r 30, 1992, . +- tr?eo=c'!ed stn A.Yt. _@g 0136, Page 36 6 s Pinellas County, Florins, Public ^ 1Q, Itak 'Altd to Rohr 16 Silvio to9ulher with- iilf and sln'ulac Ike o ' appurlennncet_ therelpttlo• • belonging or In, anywise %ppertaining, and cll the e,tale, right, title, 'interest' lien, equity and claim-whol- (oewi of the sold (irsr-pasty; taker in* Jaw or egrily; to the only: properluse, btniftl arccLbehboj of•+Itba saIX eeeostd'party (o?evn. a il!ll?ftaf, The .1d fitst-porty•has signed anif sealed these presents the do? a'nd-ypr - firs! ItboEi tlliltttrt.• _ - - . Agntl& ?84PP?aled??and ddollvered In relents -if: A I• ? re 1L .'a?? ..' . • ........ ...._ ............. an Print Nare: D. Jones Pauline .... -. .......•........ ............. °!-. y..... n................ , .... ........ ......... a .......... ....... ,: -Prislt Nwwt• 'XUA L. JOnes - STATE OF FLORIDA, coI1NTY•or . ,PIIELIAS j HEREBY CZIt;r FY that'on this day, before rile. an olficir.duly.autlsorised in the Slate aforeatlid and in tote County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally. appeared PAIAMM'KIPHM to to' lolls person described an and who. eietuted the foregoing •1nsl,umcni and She acknowledged lWare me that, She eaeeuted the tame. WITNESS my land and' official seal in the Coonly and State last aforrssid this 11 day of April, A. b. 1994 . l .?! ?t+?J;\ KVA L. d0NE9 .: T } My 030p68QN I CC 320p7 ~ ' t)(INItO• Ihislttllar t0. IiP1 s . f q,e,a •es ibYry P1dY lMlagsrt ' 1 1it Instrument W* ,d by: Milton-D. 'Jones, Attorney Addlar 501 S. Ft. Harrison Ave., Suite 206 16 .t ,- 7 a• t ' r • t Cleaxwute3r, Florida 346 KARLEEN.F. DEBCAKER,.CPERK RECORb VERIFIED BY: AW. J •'I`' Receipt #: 1200500000000007183 Date: 07/28/2005 ORIGINAL r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description FLD2005-07075 04 Flexible Commercial Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid . • Check ALCO CENTER eca 1326 • In Person 1,205.00 Payment Total: $1,205.00 r 0 -0 ?i I , '2 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page I of 1 7/28/2005 3:39:17PM Revenue Account No Amount Paid 010-341262 Line Item Total: 1,205.00 $1,205.00 cReceipt.rpt w July 26, 2005 • `/V/L Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc. Wayne Wells, AICP City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 RE: DC CUSTOMS @ 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD. Case Number/Address: (to be assigned) / 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd Applicant: Rophie Family Partnership c/o ALB Consulting Corp 1420 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-443-0718 FAX: 727-447-2369, Engineer's E-MAIL: slincoln i ,LACivii.com Dear Mr. Wells: ORIGINAL We have attached the following items to supplement a Flexible Development Application for this project to be reviewed as a Comprehensive Infill Project: • (1) Check for $1,205 (Application Fee) • (1) Original Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Project) • (1) Copy of Property Deed • (1) Copy Property Appraiser Record Card • (1) Project Narrative & Legal Description • (1) Copy of Signed & Sealed Survey • (1) Signed & Sealed Set of Site & Landscape Plan Sets (w/ (1) 8.5 x 11 copy) • (1) Copy of Building & Sign Elevations (w/ (1) 8.5 x 11 copy) • (14) Copies/Packages (including all of the above documents) Please contact our office if you have any further questions regarding the project. We look forward to your completeness approval followed review of the project before the DRC on September 1, 2005 and the City of Clearwater CDB on October 18, 2005. Sincerely, LA Civil Scott Linco 20 RIP F 1r;; President Cc: John Atanasio ALBA Consulting Corporation (Owners' Agent) PLANNING r SVC Clilt OF cu_ a 1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com r FLD2005-07075 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Date Received: 07/28/2005 DC CUSTOMS ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 290B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet i A c r -f;re^C)? TE ?JJJ/0 0 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 21, 2005 Mr. John Atanasio ALBA Consulting Corp. 1420 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 0 4 / CITY GE C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2005-07075 - 2430 Gulf To Bay Boulevard Dear Mr. Atanasio: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly Street) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 11.39 feet, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) and to permit a six-foot high non-opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly Street and east along Kilmer Avenue), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) DENIED the application with the following bases: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.F. 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area and will not enhance other redevelopment efforts. 4. The proposal does not comply with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria per Section 3- 1202.G. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYr HAMILTON, COUNCILME-MBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" October 21, 2005 FLD2005-07075 - Page 2 4 4 An appeal of a Level Two denial (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the { final determination of the case. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner I, at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Very truly yours, Michae Delk, Al P Planning Director S: (Planning Departmentl C D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslGulf To Bay 2430 -DC Customs (C) - 10-18-05 - DeniedlFLD2005-07075 Development Order.doc Page 1 of 1 Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John A Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:48 AM To: 'Scott Lincoln' Subject: RE: DC Customs Scott, Staff reports will be available on October 13th and the agenda should be set by October 3. If you will email me a reminder on those dates, I'd be happy to provide you the information then. John Schodtler -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:29 AM To: Schodtler, John Cc: Alba Consulting Corp Subject: DC Customs John: Please update us re: your Staff Report and where we will be on the 10/18 CDB agenda. Thanks, Scott Lincoln, PE President LA Civil 727-446-9000 9/29/2005 ?aLY?s -D?o?s 293o c a fill I' ? 2908 291 A ?ww a -°° g g t` _f-,? CITY OF CLEARWATER _ w w ore A AND VICINITY PINEUAS COUNTY, PUDRIDA GULF TO BAY BLVD - - - - PREPARED fir 106 »v. rp, 1.2 a, J _ __ 305 100 ,03 Ills 1W ,W 10) T00 0 t A 11 IN g 0 t+z ut' 2 era Iii 3 a1s ne . qq K > '. 11> H0 131 4 IN { R 219 , o Ito=' eel act 172 12t *al 6 ?.t 141 r]. 7 / .r } m ze e t ^ } 73x 6 ere yr 3 g In em >o tow, 31/08 m m it V3 sae 12 >It 14 nor Trailer ? uo .., lodge'' ts 42/04 +ai 1 1 ! Tr 41/06 1C Ri ,04 a - 2.t I as 204 ; AV I tae 117 203 ) 6091 112 + 210 ' ] 41/05 a 4 el! 2 n4 ne nl ns mz 714 ro It, err} +z1) to z1 ? ... err ] fig am t 2 2 ¦/'`1 t7 . Its +e- 220 227 42/01v 5 to tar 22 zn , K O L r 1K 136 123 ]] 33 ]35 eoe6 +4 " 22 ts7 g d sw 7 I12 171 M 239 2 @ n/ore 7, 4e ,48 111) 241 ?" ! 6 2.3 D ore 15 i en g Re c. an c? em u? 3 to e t1 . 10 1 1 9 9 ---------- 1 701 ]SI Itt it 1 O2 ,• + Q zas 2 12 I 14 3 77 4 s7 10 a ew MA 2 » 219 ?" } N 3 760 14> 7' 2 + r 4 Q3 We14 ,N Q ' m] !+'b We 5 s 15 fA' 'S o - m7 rm ts s R ss - 1 ? 6 16 >n s s 8 9 T, ? a S w4 63 d e+ A ell 7 >m " R SA. 80 s PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION t^ ENGINEERING CY ? ? a A '1i9Y.?2s,23 A 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Ckas-111. FL 33756 ?r CR `- Ph.: (813)562-4750, roc (813)526-4755 fl 8 ? n13p://w»».<leaf»6191-n.<om/eng4leer/ 8 2 F I Disclaimer: Q Pudic III-mallon data to turngned by the City *1 Clearwater q Public Works Admslletrallon/Englneering, and must ore accepted and used by the reclplent with the uoderolonding that the dol. received wait collected r« the purpose or developing a graphic a Inlrostructure inventory. As such, the City of Clearwater PWA/E make. no warranties, eApfessed or Implied. Concerning the C Qr CD I accuracy, completeness rc1.1,111ty, or sulla61ll1y of this dot. far I any other particular use. iurlnerm.re, the City of Cleorw.ter • •••••••••••.....•..•••••• I PWA/E assumes no Ibeillty wnals as-, associated with the use ••••.••••... • k or misuse or such data. ; a C A "T, CO I This Ail., Page Is wb6 ctto periodic change*- 11-- inrarmalien aaouf laical reNSlans p1e.u call Pwp/E ar visit our Wee site p m I N 1001 n L V ---•- logos C 24 0 100 200 400 600 I ad o I t 12/03 SCALE: 1" = 400• d ? ?. LEGEND: malr O 41/1} ? I Sbl I!? O BLOCK NUMBER _ -- -...--v..-- DRUID r no-m f 0 1234 LOT ADDRESS „ 1 ROAD 8 ore z wi -,u rrn-w i t e1)° wl 2 0 t Is> an m 11 ? M/01 ? -?-?- CITY LIMITS LINE 2 en. 2 t9 2 ,» z7s O +O W 4a , .;. p 44/01 mug E I r---1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY } we w> 3 tR BOB we } ,e, m 13/02 13/01 p S } mug 'L--j OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS 4 ert 6U 4 i7 1)a Be tors es z7e >A m, 47 Q 4 44/02 I A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX 5 ere e/e 5 tel. rli 4 Lt . 187 43 aep 7!3 6 w1) .al 6 1900 S 5 169 W r 2W l t ________ ' CITY OWNED PROPERTY 7 we me 1 ?P. !E, y __ ____ ---.--- --__-- --- ----.• 2 8 t 6 Poo n Z IV fj j F F F F eR F I MDR ZONING DESIGNATION Poe g vie w9 8 .N g G2 f.e t rt 7 p// t>3 175 N 266 m9 691 4??:C7 ?'!` q 'i } f t t ?I & iii n "' ' m/et ZONE LINE 10 PII 60 0 9Il 1 9/e 1) a 9/e 137 179 990 699 697 605 a. st A a A F A ¢ F ^ ? R GJ 7=W3M TW77 ?i J Q P e b i S RR rR? 11 p -- I Q mow I 100 /wl 107 L 7: 7 S rf i 200>9 O 42SeK7/X too 10/a6 0 5929 12/07/93 FIUME DOD m 1736 DO/,3/09 Co 6493 02/03/00 toa 1 mor0 o lone tos ' D S n c°, r 6 n n R I d l ore H E N R Y L .! I M c M U L L E N P A R K A 1 I 101 4079-nor 43/05 E . 19 1 d : w e tl s $ $ I 1101! roll 103 103 ran 3759-101 C - r, O / u a i $ 6 b 6 6 e i 0 c E {, 6 2 E ! - ---- h ^ _- rtiJ p R P ?, R ?' F F F F F k R 102 ola .: 1: Iz F F F F R R R I! I 191/1 j 10 101 1099 i _ "a °s a { ) 1 I REVISED: 09/18/00 (Ile 100 1 / 51 53 54 55 1 23 22 27 20 79 18 17 t8 15 14 - 13 12 11 L 6 s ' IIw w as ZONING ATLAS "m199 51 & $ w y, w L $ E $ w " w 7 w 1 2 t0 9 8 7 8 S /k to n ? 30 9A w 1/4 OF SECn 0 1 299B ? 30 98 310A A 29 S - 16 E S8 - 4 ?v IV 281 A 51 R w 0-?U-7 ?? ?;14 20 (?:::)u ?-Pf-u itp""' l w `6` Ito , ?>e ?J DREW C.R. 528 - - - - - STREET - - ------------ tI - :: j 1 ; 12/02`.....: i i ' ---- -- , ° -u< ; cx-P 95 1 K : : i 1 : ----- - ------ is i 1 J JerWu .. SrN(N: ' c1 S , , .---,.......... . ......... rt67 2{ n< •------------_: ;_ . . a j me.a.lr .._... _ .. ..,t 27 m i ......... _....... .. 22 _ ST. PETERSBURG JUNIOR COLLEGE PG I 7rvn. Orb: A fv .l . : ' : ar. 1 12/01 - . e a , r 1 : c N Nat- i f Mn I 6- M vAO. 2 .... e ... 5i 0 A- Art, : ...:...: ..? ..... ?';' : ' H ._i - ; Arts 1... , 1 ;..... . ' 1 rs 1 1 :LOT 1 .. .. ................... ?iz DR $ ti II-s:w s.lnu.a ;F====++? ' ,r -- „ ---------------- I J , 3 . 30 2 - '- a u sl ^ O '1 - _ r O 4 1 1 i6,. 15g1 16 1 x ---- 9 i8 17 ,6 IS t4 17 t2 ------------------------------------- ----------- _ 11 10 ; Oa` I J- O 9w 8 7 w w .w.l eo T 1 FTT-,---?_M- NASN wSTREET $ t: 3 I -JI I 17 lal t2 1 2 pe 26 A L' 27 25 e0 1 247 GU • lw d" TO ' ° 5° w w 67' A -AC E ----___ _ 1 3 'it a, 24 22 21 20w 19 18 17 16 15 Z13 ; ? .n I 4 116 27 d CV { ? ..._... We x $? 5 . a 5 ro I /01 ® 7Q1 Ire ue $ WHITMAN crwacr 4 3« 4 47 3 6 >e , f: w a w t w toe 2 7 8 9 10 It 22 to 21 19w 18 $ 17. 16 « 15 14 13 x 12 vo n>a :1 I>+9 CHAUCER na 2 17 J J01 V' J00 IS l0 E 1230 14 13 S ,s Iz go Jlo eo t 1 c 13/6 $ 13/03 ........ 113/0{; STREET $ I too 14/05 i0w ft ---- --- T { 13 lz -----•--- '°e GREEK $ $10 ORTHODOX tEET` CHURCH ............... 13/091 i 3/05 ... .... . ? J z Z :.......w! 'R x L-i S.R. 60 40 STUDEBAKER'S . 14/06 j j 2 92=39 1 GULF 70 BAY BLVD /06 R Il/O6 C ................ ll 4747 CITY OF CLEARWATER _ AND VICINITY PINEUAS COUNTY. FLORIDA PREPARED BY xR PA RED PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING BN ., e9 nV WO S. NyUe Ave.. Oeamatu. FL 33756 Ph, (7271562-4750. Fox: (727)526-4755 http: //www.tleorwala-n.<om/eny_0pmlmml:/puak_wark:/ingmrer/ rust d ; 0lfclalmer: g I Publie Intormotlon dol. is lomished by the City of Clearwal- -0 28 a Public Works Adminlstratlon/Englneering. and must be accepted '..? I and used by the recipient with the underslonding that the dolo 8 i r-lved was c.llecled for the purpose of d.v .plnq o graphic 0 infrast-et- inventory. As wch. the City of Clea-ler PWA/E - ' mOkes n0 warranties. !Mr<ssed or 1-11.d. ca ernlnq the accuracy. completeness, reliability. or wilabOlty of this dot, far LJeei I A4 any Other p.rli<al.r us<. Further - the City a, clear..ole, PWA/T assumes no liability whatsoever associated wlth the use or miwse of wch dola. This Altos page Is subject to perlodic changes. i F. Infarmall.n Obaut Iate>l revyians please call PWA/E o, tIJOO' I visit - Web sle. 18 1 11/07 ni._ns t ? I I 14/01; j ..................._..........: tl i .......................... _... _..... : LOT 2 - f 14/11 [peat j I ivP 2...... _... tOfeO 14/10 m I at ? I N '- 0 100 200 400 600 I; SCALE: 1' = 400' _ LEGEND: sh °x B BLOCK NUMBER ` PII ,9 1234 LOT ADDRESS ?? D d ; ? CITY LIMITS LINE ---- ? 'arosr r'--1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY 23/ L---J OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS s icon ? AGREEMENT TO ANNEX CITY OWNED PROPERTY > MDR ZONING DESIGNATION R ZONE LINE REiOhiMD 0i'a. Q 6953 Oey06/at REVISED: 06/20/02 -$ ZONING ATLAS NE 1 /4 OF SECTION 1 7 a n R FLD2005-07075 = 70 ARHPRINC 2431 GULF TO BAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4310 ANCIL, RUTH M 518 EDENVILLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6336 BLISS, KRISTI L 301 KILMER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4335 CALVERT, JASON K CALVERT, ASHLEY L 304 EVELYN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4307 CLEARWATER UNDERWRITERS 2433 GULF TO BAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4323 DAYTON ANDREWS INC 2388 GULF TO BAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4195 FORMELIO, BRIAN 212 KILMER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4332 FULLER, THEODORE F III 521 EDENVILLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6335 GJEKA, ARBEN GJEKA, ENKELEDA 216 EVELYN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4305 ALLEY REHBAUM & CAPES ASSURAN 2433 GULF TO BAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4323 ANDORFER, HOWARD W JR ANDORFER, CAROL T 522 EDENVILLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6336 BORGAN, BARBARA L 205 EVELYN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4306 CAMPBELL, MICHELE L 201 KILMER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4333 COLLINS, DAVID L 200 KILMER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4332 EDGERTON, JON F 300 KILMER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4334 FORMELIO, JAMES FORMELIO, MARY 216 KILMER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4332 GARCIA, LINDA 2400 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4339 GRIMWOOD, MARION E 2447 WHITMAN ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4343 40 m ALONZO, GUSTAVO ALONZO, MARIA R 213 EVELYN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4306 BAUMHARDT, WANDA 301 EVELYN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4308 BOUNSENGSAY,KHAMTHOUL BOUNSENGSAY,PHANSEY 311 KILMER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4335 CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION DOUG WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33761 CURRENT OWNER 2455 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4302 FISK, DURWOOD & GLADYS TRUST FISK, DURWARD C III BEN C/O HARDING & CARBONE 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD HOUSTON TX 77025 - 1119 FRIESE, EUNICE F 1100 HILLCREST DR DEARBORN MI 48124 - 1214 GEORGE, THOMAS GEORGE, MISTY 218 KILMER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - GRUCHACZ,NANCYANNE 2441 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4302 H D CLEARWATER PORTFOLIO HOHIMER, DAVID E 3625 DUFFERIN ST STE 500 HOHIMER, MARY K DOWNSVIEW ON M3K 1N4 00030 208 EVELYN AVE ANADA HUANG FAMILY PROPERTIES INC 2456 GULF TO BAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4305 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4324 490 40 TCHISON MATTHEW K JACOBS LENORE THE HUANG, MING QI 1804 OAKRIDGE RD HUTCHISON, ERICA M OAK TREE LAND TRUST SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 3725 2452 CHAUCER ST 12360 66TH ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4301 LARGO FL 33773 - 3434 JOYCE, DAVID D KLUFETOS, JOHN KUCHAR, R TIMOTHY JOYCE, LISA L KLUFETOS, FROSO KUCHAR, SHEILA 209 EVELYN AVE 2286 MINNEOLA RD PO BOX 1372 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4306 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4972 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1372 LITCHMAN, L BRADLEY 2452 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4341 MARTINEZ, ANDREW 211 KILMER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4333 MEADER, RAYMOND P 2465 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4302 MILLS, R EDWARD MILLS, MARGARET J 217 EVELYN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4306 NARGANES, PATRICIA 301 S FERNWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4210 PATTON, LAWRENCE D PATTON, DAWN L 300 EVELYN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4307 RHODUS, DEANN M 2404 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4339 ROSS, WANDA J 2442 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4341 SUNNY GROVE M/H PARK INC 2463 GULF TO BAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4349 MONESTINA, EVELIO MONESTINA, REBECA 308 EVELYN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4307 NORWOOD, ROBERT W NORWOOD, BARBARA A 2458 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4341 PINA, WILFRED D PINA, MURIEL A 2408 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4339 ROPHIE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 SOUTHALL, IAN B 306 KILMER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4334 TARANTULA, PATRICIA E PO BOX 536 NEWBERRY FL 32605 - 1623 MR. JOHN ATANASIO 1420 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FL 33756 ORTH, JAN 2447 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4302 REAL GLOBAL INVESTMENTS LLC 3120 TIFFANY DR BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3634 ROPHIE, ALAN ROPHIE, RALPH 1420 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6147 STEVEN, JOHN I STEVEN, ANTJE 2466 SHELLEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4341 THOMAS, OWEN A THOMAS, NA VET 310 KILMER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4334 TOKARSKI, JAN TWIN LAKES INC TYRRELL, JAMES F TOKARSKI, ZOFIA 2419 GULF TO BAY BLVD # 208 8714 33RD ST W 92 COMMONWEALTH AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4360 UNIVERSITY PL WA 98466 - 2205 PISCATAWAY NJ 08854 - 5428 VALE, DAWN S 102 LEXINGTON ST OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 4328 WITZ, MICHAEL WITZ, REBEKAH 2448 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4301 YOUNGBLOOD, CLARENCE L 1270 BURMA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020 VLAHOS, JOHN VLAHOS, SOPHIA 7621 N OLCOTT AVE NILES IL 60714 - 3117 WOMACK, KEVIN L WOMACK, HOLLY A 2440 CHAUCER ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4301 at WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY CO PO BOX 2710 ROANOKE VA 24001 - 2710 WOOD, MICHAEL L 212 EVELYN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4305 t Agreed, Thank You. John Schodtler -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 4:19 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: Alba Consulting Corp Subject: RE: Revised Project Narrative L John: We hereby agree that the below items should be made part of our application and variance requests, of course, being the result of the fact that these conditions exist today as non-conformities that can in no way be corrected as part of this application without the owner being subject to lawsuits by the current tenant. Thanks Scott Lincoln, PE President LA Civil -----Original Message----- From: John.Schodtler@myClearwater.com [mailto:John.Schodtler@myC[earwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:00 PM To: Scott Lincoln Subject: RE: Revised Project Narrative Scott, I just need to know 100 percent that you and your client understand that the following are required to be Sufficient in order to go onto the CDB meeting: 1. Revise request to include reductions to front setbacks and landscape buffers along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue; and 2. Reduction of site visibility triangles at garage exits onto Kilmer Avenue. A simple reply to this email will be sufficient, as the resubmitted packet did not specifically address these items. My packet had no revisions in RED TEXT. Thanks John Schodtler -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 1:20 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: Revised Project Narrative John: As requested I have revised the Project Narrative to include pavement setback and buffer variances for the Enterprise Rent-a-Car on the south portion of the site. The revisions are in RED TEXT. Please email me or call me with questions. Scott September 7, 2005 • /V/L Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc. John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: RESPONSE TO DRC COMMENTS FLD2005-07075 DC Customs 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Clearwater, FL Dear Mr. Schodtler: SEP 0 Z ; tai .... ,.. ... _ C.z i . CrL 3: On behalf of the applicant, Alba Consulting Corporation, LA Civil is submitting a response to the following DRC Staff Comments received from you during the DRC Meeting on 9/1/05. The comments are presented in normal print followed by our responses in italics. Engineering Condition (Steve Doherty) 1. Show on the plan 20-foot sight triangles where vehicles exiting garage enter Kilmer Avenue. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Response: The required 20 ft Site Triangles are presented on the Site Plan and the Landscape Plan. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Provide a copy of a recorded cross access agreement with adjoining property owner that is binding upon successive property owners. Response: A letter is attached herein from ALBA Consulting Corporation which indicates cross access will be provided for ingress/egress from the parcel across contiguously owned property. 2. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Response: The above note has been added to the Site Plan. ORIGINAL - 1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com DC Customs (FLD2005-070%5) 09/07/05 Page 2 of 5 3. Any new or replaced concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. [sidewalks shall NOT to be constructed within this apron area(s)]. Refer to City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #103. i r > ; r ? • i -, F Response. The above note has been added to the Site Plan. ?I f , - i -? - 1 - SFP 0 9 20"S5 Fire Condition (Leonard Rickard) ii 1. ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHO? TY, HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPO SIBWITYOF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. Response: Acknowledged. The above note has been added to the Site Plan. 2. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Response: Acknowledged. The above note has been added to the Site Plan. 3. North Drive needs 24 foot width for entry and drive aisle and 30 foot entry and exit radius. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Response: Acknowledged. The Site Plan has been revised as requested. 4. Meet NFPA 30 A requirements for repair garage 2000 Edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Response: Acknowledged. The above note has been added to the Site Plan. 5. Show more detail on Entry / Exit from Gulf to Bay. PRIOR TO CDB Response: The Site Plan has been revised to include dimensions of the driveways to Gulf-to-Bay and the configuration of the median and lanes on Gulfto-Bay. 6. Engineered Spray Booth Required. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Response: Acknowledged. The above note has been added to the Site Plan. 7. No customer accessible parking to be allowed inside building. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Response: Acknowledged. The above note has been added to the Site Plan. Operation Hours (John Schodtler) 1. Provide hours of operations. Response: According to DC Customs, normal business hours are 11:00-7:00 M-F & 11:00-5:00 Sat. ORIGINAL DC Customs (FLD2005-070 i' ,' ?-- - - - - 09/07/05 r?) Page 3 of 5 J SE? U 1 2U":3 PJ,. C? Landscape Curbing Condition (John Schodtler) 1. Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Response: Wheel stops have been added to the parking stalls as shown on the revised SitePlan. Landscape (John Schodtler) 1. Note: Location of attached sign on Kilmer Avenue appears to be blocked from view by the proposed tree. Response: The applicant is proposing only one (1) wall sign on the southern face of the building at the SE corner. Traffic Eng Condition (Bennett Elbo) PRIOR TO CDB: 1. Provide site distance triangles per Community Development Code section 3-904. Response: The required 20 ft Site Triangles are presented on the Site Plan and the Landscape Plan. 2. Two (2) required parking spaces inside garage do not meet City of Clearwater dimension standards (24-foot drive aisle required). Response: The proposed interior parking will be utilized for vehicle service only and is no longer intended to be utilized as customer parking. Zoning Condition (John Schodtler) 1. Proposed canopy over front entrance on Kilmer Avenue cannot exceed 40% of the 25 foot setback (10 feet). Response: The proposed canopies over the entry/exit doors have been dimensioned on the Site Plan and do in fact meet the required setbacks and allowable 10' overhang, 2. Clarify. How does the reduction in front setback result in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance and landscaped areas in excess of the minimum required. Response: The reduction in setback is being requested to provide for drastic design improvements on the parcel including paved parking, landscaping, stormwater treatment, etc. The proposed landscaping meets code and is a vast improvement to the existing site conditions with no green area or plant material. ? OR1 I I N A DC Customs (FLD2005-07075) L ? c?.,J ; - ?JI 09/07/05 1 Page 4 of 5 PLAIN 1, v Q1YC:r 3. Clarify. How the physical characteristics of the building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes. Response: DC Customs is the proposed tenant for the building. DC customs provides specialized vehicle service which includes adding audio systems, installing customized interiors, installing tires & rims, and adding body paint and decals. The owner of DC Customs presently operates his business in an industrial & retail center on Ulmerton Road in Largo. He intends to move his business to 2430 Gulf-to-Bay to provide himself with a larger facility and to improve his location. To better identify the parking demand, LA Civil & ALBA recently visited the facility in Largo to observe the operation and assess the parking requirements for DC Customs. The owner explained that he has (7) employees, (8) cars being services and he sees no more than (2) customers visiting his facility at any given time, since he operates by appointment only. He explained that he generally has (5) cars in the service area being worked on, with (3) cars placed outside in the parking lot to provide adequate room in the garage. Hence, his parking demand is simply (7) employees + (2) customers + (3) vehicles to be serviced = (12) parking spaces required. The proposed Site Plan provides (13) parking stalls. It should be noted that all vehicles being serviced are stored inside the garage at night due to insurance mandates and for protection of the expensive merchandise being installed in the vehicles. 4. How is the facade of the building which fronts on public roads designed with windows, cornices or other architectural features or treatments? Response: The building will be washed and painted, awnings are proposed at the pedestrian entrances, and, architecturally designed window shutters are proposed to be added at the existing building windows, all of which will improve the building appearance substantially. 5. Clarify. How the design of the parcel proposed for development is compatible with the surrounding area. Response. DC Customs is a Specialized Vehicle Service Use which operates a business that provides for customizing automobiles. The subject services include installation of custom wheels, rims, window tinting, stereo equipment, and detailed body work. DC Customs is expected to be a lower intensity use than the historical uses in the building. The adjacent uses to the south, east and west are Enterprise Rent- A-Car, Advance Auto Parts (Repair) and "A to Z" Auto Care, respectively. Both Advance Auto Parts (Repair) and "A to Z" Auto Care operate (6) service bays. Each of these businesses performs all types of vehicle repairs, with activities being performed at the bay openings or outside. 0 DC Customs (FLD2005-07075) 09/07/05 Page 5 of 5 DC Customs will perform its service activities in a completely enclosed garage area away from view to adjacent properties. The vehicles to be serviced will be secured in a fenced compound temporarily awaiting transfer to garage area. The services employ trained technicians, utilize high-end equipment & parts and require an interior environment to assure quality installation. No outside activities are proposed. It should be noted that all vehicles being serviced are stored inside the garage at night due to insurance mandates and for protection of the expensive merchandise being installed in the vehicles. 6. Signage proposed will require a separate, Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) approval to increase the number of attached signs from one to two. Please note that CSP looks at all signs on the property, including the Enterprise Rent A Car business. Response Acknowledged. 7. Revise request to include front setback reductions for the Enterprise Rent A Car portion of the property and provide a Comprehensive Landscape plan for the landscape reductions. Note: staff will not support the setback or landscape reductions for the Enterprise Rent A Car portion of the property. Response: The Applicant has proposed landscaping in vast excess of that which exists onsite today. The Enterprise-Rent-A-car portion of the site is subject to lease constraints that will not allow removal of pavement to add landscaping. In addition, there is no room on the rear portion of the site to add excess landscaping that cannot be placed on the Enterprise-Rent-A-car portion of the site. The Landscape Plan is once again being submitted as proposed. The following documents are attached to supplement your review of the above responses to comments: • (15) Copies of Revised Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Project) • (15) Copies of Letter from ALBA re: Cross Access Agreement for Ingress/Egress • (15) Copies of Property Deed a (15) Copies Property Appraiser Record Card 0 (15) Copies of Revised Project Narrative & Legal Description • (15) Copies of Property Survey • (15) Copies Signed & Sealed Revised Sets of Site & Landscape Plan Sets & (1) 8.5 x 11 copy • (15) Copies of Revised Building & Sign Elevations & Floor Plans & (1) 8.5 x 11 copy If you have any-questions or comments regarding the above referenced material, please give me a call. Sincerely, LA Civil Scott CC: John Atanasio, Alba Consulting my t i t rL.ANI, __ :'yGS Planning Department 100 Clearwater Clearwater, South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 C( SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION C 15 Cl? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including?l5 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans UK SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ L 2oS CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: v NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: 1\riatI E :Pii Lwy Bat Trmc-g i S"ip CL AL 6A Cog1;,uurmlc, CbRP, I Nc MAILING ADDRESS: T_i` ? u%Ltl? !??rIR61ff , L' 6Aa-W r&2_ , f_-7L 33-7S(,o°' (o 1+-7 PHONE NUMBER: 411_13 Is FAX NUMBER: 02-1 ) W-7 Z34 p,? ALAr4 IRONIC ) 'RAL-f>" Ro PROPERTY OWNER(S): etP+AlE VAmtuy FAarrN)eA5i-IIP CECEuA_corczc H , C"C-(ZyL- i (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Z?m tS A-IrA ?_t SAS 1 © ESi 1, ?^(1?'? o'ti A L6A Cp??t1?i.Tf(SC7 Gi, r, MAILING ADDRESS: ?I Z© &-qgr ?IlRiGei- PHONE NUMBER: (72-7) L143-C57"9 FAX NUMBER: (-7Z--7 )l 94:7 ° Z3(. 7 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATIION: (Code Section 4-202.A) -7 STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 243o Ciu 0: -TO - r>->Ay GL`1V ? , Umaw?T ? -- - LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C ?ee ArrA cAAEt>? ec- , ? . - ? (if not listed here, please n to the loc tion of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 8 ?? I i6 ©© C.,.., C3 Q 13 Q PARCEL SIZE: 0- 910q C??? 1 i I / J M6L-) c.1; y C2E (acres, square feet) C_,- p , N\Z PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): \Xq I CLE. Stsiru I(.E C?CIST/?l7 & -O WC SF (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): APMoVAl, Of 0611 I CLE S64V IC& USt? VIA Wm e W_, LL Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) AWLtCA-rI ol1. N Pf u C.A-t?-r R(0PbSFS -Tn meer PkK, 44 R 12C-? n WS ?R_r `-91OIv1111SC, I . 0(bb S , likfPL? CA4Y i 11610S -Tb UPC 90 E S i r E_ 1BY Awon G ST M LokrG?_ -7m NT, GR ' SWIG-- Bi s e? i M&2z0 W G At66Sg i? _.J (See k-r-rFCRC Ti E C>4R6,&" ) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ') i 1 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SI N AFFIDAVIT-ATTESTING Q1NNE;RSH1 (see ll ' page 6) 1 1 i D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) F?1 • *«t I S? GvLE ii :r? lx-' Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is loc ted Tate PRZ?05-, 064I1CLE S&LVICE USE tstu.. octalkc W1T1443 R4 "ISTiMC RLNC- J:ZNe2/ 6a-LV u-r ILA 2-- tD A S A 80 (5y SN Of BY A'A61.1 CAA IM 07-025 A 14O LA-r62, Lo i?Y M aro2 &MtNy TT4E Pt2tft(E6 uS C- IULILL, 'R-e o;-? LbwUL. I AV&'J&I-ry 1 41Z ?D YnK-) 'V'asnm t z, Ac,, •'Aj&1 0GAiCLES 0NLY. 14 E uSE IS SuR4WN0&D f'y ABM, RWA12 F:A-- ,IUTiES 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. --r+4P?2.?PATC-n LISsr IS A 44KS 21C&- tac4C At-1 T?fF_ i?/l Pr-,/IT,/ I? c? o T?-i? + &?Tecvr is A ro a Au-ro 96A 1t?- ,q N o Tb -rOC 6Wr IS AN iJA- l e C-? /4u-rb --rr hl,tb RC,PAi2.. 7-+{E Q(&1%SEb use- IS L.C-SS 14MISE ADO Ijiu- W M6 wAq 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed T?E MoPPsc---r> u5E w iu, vE 1F IS-roaJ CAL Y THE 5-,"E w I-M LEs&C-2 iltre,isl1y , Ado vJiU. cAuSE Nz t(-iPAcTS To t,16( t4&-k14m0 t4GAL-TH 9 SAELr 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 1HE eazPOSEo LISE uSiLL. AAVC on+E 6?4-17WAniC6 F4?OYLA KI LrN6E A hh , (Z) I` x rrs To IC 1 tic-,(L i,4:> W-GIn?aLr CPoss eel 'ro Gum-To- Y b 5>rt Eu SrICE& Ti-f? P2?. G- t:-r C G2 C-itZCULPMDs-4 A MD rAfff0-0E5-75RVVC-U-3AyS 176,& 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development 'T E 'P&,(0560 IJ6JE(o M61T Mza55S A CCIM L,W 0Se-A PI fX)- f-- 0,146 t ??ca2Ni i&)AT6L. I dvtM06M6,1T5 To -RA-n(SIrolLi-t 7-!S f-J V'OZ/CAL Q S 1147-0 D11E Sevres FfTn t dj -64 e Comm u nl r(Y C {fmA CTC-- cF -rAt6 A4•E16He&z#cn-b , i?/il CE CMA I nt info lA?ir 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, THEaPi_ EC-T SX10L- CS SGCQk6D fi ?Z4/4 ?/Z CctMMC?2 0041C(ES 7-6 .g6?? Af40 6W---O qW'k VICUl Aq- V&4iCLC- SC--JICC- ACTidf-36S WILL 0CCLdt*2 it lSieC TE C(S-r(,A 9 ODD SF eLbG, DWS role V-6NICIL6 GAJ7W -e EKYT I,3I(.(,.. &E FA-CI r,SG ALt3AY F-WaN I I TiAt, P2Z -, &W Ill 6?), ROU(LS of ORWAI OAJ WY LL t ; STth Q Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 7-0 .A l>I?> /Nr6tt a2 G , 51I[&A.? Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater i? C.rrY D&CWI 't &ff- s-rJ #40A 1QDS I S i m P1me7`Ctt w affauT RE4sc,/4A & ()6v, r oAX 2. e development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infll redevelopment project or residential infll project will not duce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the F provements.) q?-r'ffk G, PZ,,-( UALLXC-S f 2RCASE iAH6Q iM191 c?Lrty?/&4'rS 0CCLA/Z 1 10 i,5ab d "TIE t'(2aP6Sk HE(l6-/n? w i LLu (bAVE 1eZP6A.-ry AMAIs%' 's MAajtuT JAwE t S 'THE OZzP" SU-6S7iA-rXr1iALLY . O"IC" Qit t uNIOau$-'(L? i [\(CRCA-SC rTS MAt2i4.F-r - C- ra Orai . "[H c, RGAL STi4TC L1 AAA_F C-f iaO1fM -rOOAy, VALU 3. The usbs within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. C azofbsC? ikm t c? E SazuiCE Use i s orjj&2_ 5i SE ArrL&-44&-_-> i r4 ?InT ZOD^1 h f'46' Nsraicrl At-V) HAS w&? tips-roairmu_y * -r.>Ar-mis L1OCAT?aW- 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. -17T,k& J" i Ct - -;RZVi6E USE RC--P At&S A LbKE`f Gocq SA-{oP A-M b 1S AUT/ C Z -I-0 ?A -r ?F_ AuTo (1QCOA W) A-tiD AguAfs iCl- A rro OL?S &eA, U.i+1 t C H 3oDKl-t-4 'fT[E P2 TecT 17 N G q6ftTC-i/Z I mTEOSlTy A CTV l i . 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infll redevelopment project are not otherwise available in t e Ct of Clea ater r >'47TEMl?lr 1 . IS AJ6 n Ll X TFfE Ex-WO/6 Two ? r us b e Cu -r vi s r 7KE2F C?L 3u t Z fnlC Ta A SI M r (_Ar i g Aj o oTy&z vog /? ?, b f ??? '? LdcA ?7ct / NG. ? //B/t ?,?LJlw?1> /1?L/NY 07U --ro °d4y, A1J\ 0669 -r#I5 L o CAM oA. f At'MSWL L I O 6L 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7_46 M.-IlbS66 U SeF , IF A; -6, u.1/[- 4CcOW f9i2_ ASS, JOW-k? Ol 'i S?-&2 uWf-r6V Vk, S/86WAL4 A& , /'77VO (4nfIbS'IM? uPrakfO(FS OA! VIE PA?ECa 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. "T 132'v'0(')SC-1D use, )FA7q ZOOOr_> J kilu- &C on(C_ 97FjO Cl.asiL -r MAKW6 TH/S &/LCEz_'' CW>E eb M ftJ 47V ! " fhb U tJJLJ_ MOV1 0E 1W EX/-?? et,6 ?0 SIM/U472... f-Va-z-FecTS /Al 1VdN -Cw AEk c mt A1c,' sceAwz/oS, 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. O ?Ti('EroT d nJC IS REQ?ES ;--> ? A6012WAL OAV ..I'& T /STi240T 4-j' S a . S SPfFCE? /Aptj ?= chi CH /h 1%W S TUE-O 6C> iA /-VT-15 CAI 7YE' K/SrdZi CAL S l rC USC &PJD d Ps? u sC-S . 9. ` 8u is So 'EQ,i 1C ?tLa., f-rct>? Si?EE? QJW O EXiS-73 36 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. _ _ PEF s T 1Y, IMKi? WiLcs _,IV= AWIb6n y14 (/?) OU7%/ St .4C?ES 6Ai S/rE Q?A i&Lcs W /(..(_ f6c ec-Q u r9c . 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. me 82,of'osls-o 3ccT PM-CAL is Abl /ni ea fa& cF. T? ?rsr?CT? J a LNJJ I `? 1 ? - t 11 i1 ? Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infllplat o+0? 1City>bfCI' atev L_? E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involy addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance witl the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemptioi to this requirement. r 5'ce 5 f6C--r4-, GRIAowa. L! w _ „ r ca wArr-&_ ,ch_ ?.-ry O„ ,fS,ICY'49 If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent, streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. A Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) W/ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, 91A including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; W/' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; (}CmJG2 SHEET OF ! L,+PJS) ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in 14 accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; N/qq? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; NI.? ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); N/A ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) , - ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): r? All dimensions; rl? r ?n? 11 i North arrow; , ; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date preparetl, j ti? 0 y 2.,55 Location map; ( CoJC-ZL_WC"r) ?! L , ( "I Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _? Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ?- i cc :WA Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; ?/. All required setbacks; ( S/TE o4rA) All existing and proposed points of access; ) All required sight triangles; (S1TE g L4,-J0SC+ PCflfl)S :?VA Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen / trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; I/- Location of all public and private easements; c/ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; t-age 4 or r - I-lexible Uevelopment Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater i? Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary seer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; , p Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; (jLA--o C)oW!F1V /8U Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; ?? Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; P A Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. Q SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; _? Number of. EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; L 61-06 CATA V11, Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _? Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. (2/ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; NAO FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional'information on site plan: (/J A; ?S -rff ^J One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist",. of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) O? LANDSCAPE PLAN: _ All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; -+7 Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; il/ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Z Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on ? required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; _? Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and % protective measures; _? Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); / Irrigation notes. Cd REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) (color rendering if possible); 0 IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); O COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1^ t ? Y I r ?` 1 0rRIGINAL )EVELO?, C;, cLF#?F Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater I: 'BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUMiIITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; (?f{C-eT S ) ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/] X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or / to remain. Cd All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). `? ( WALL s,6Ars cry ?Y Reduced signage proposal (8 Y: X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. SEE 8L-OG . C-t95i.-tTravS K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway ?_gs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. r / TION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND ONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY O CUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. ORIGINAL L. SIGNATURE: '? IK , tee" I, the undersigned, ac wledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City represen tives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. -f L -A- Sign u of property ner or representative t Page 6 of fi VF}6xible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swor It and subscribed before .me this day of A.D. 20_a to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as d tification. i wa /A LL B Not ublic, My commission expires: ,..+`"v au line in U9 Commisdon # DD IJ=? 1? 2t? °' Farpites Dec. Booded Tbm ?.,,p.F F Adazdic 'Bad Co. Tti- i F7 AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition- 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. </, : L /f Lo 12 Property Owner ! 5 14 (, - 4 ,S( U /?j S Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner / COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: Notary S:\Planning OepartmenMpplication Forms\development revieM le)3ble developrrlen."t comjie ensive inh7t application 2005.doc I ?_? !IJ?t t ORIGINAL Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater :ALBA ? ? onsulting Corp. September 1, 2005 John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: CROSS ACCESS FOR PARCEL INGRESS/EGRESS City Application No.: FLD2005-07075 DC Customs (Parcel ID # 18/29/16/00000/130/0400) 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Clearwater, FL Dear Mr. Schodtler: Licensed Real Estate Broker ALBA Consulting Corporation (ALBA) presently manages the subject property (Parcel ID # 18/29/16/00000/130/0400) for the owner, the Rophie Family Trust, being reviewed by the City of Clearwater in this Comprehensive Infill Application (FLD2005-07075). ALBA also manages the contiguously owned property to the west (Parcel ID # 18/29/16/00000/130/0200 and 18/29/16/00000/130/0300). The purpose of this letter is to confirm that all existing tenants, including the potential tenant for the 9,000 SF building made part of this application, will be provided legal cross access rights from parcel to parcel for the purpose of ingress/egress to the subject parcel being leased. Very truly yours, J hn Atanasio President CC: LA Civil, Scott ?incoln? ' PLAM '' l ORIGNAL 1420 Court Street • Clearwater, Florida 33756 • (727) 443-0718 • Fax (727) 447-2369 Shopping Center Professionals Management • Leasing • Sales APR 14, 1994. 5i0$PM. 111rTCtArr.eM -- -- . RAMCO FORM s Ft,A. ' f. F PI TiEL!? Ao COUNV. OFF:REC:-BK 8633 'PG. 326 ?NI['a ?l?j E:ecWed rhlr 11 dal oP?'"f?rfl - ?!. D. 19 94' , by f?+? first ALAN ROPHIE, RALPH Faum, dCwILIk BU1EC]f and C]'it'M ' Pam, ettially, posloj/ice address is O?J?' Y .7. OOMP bquire, c/o H.Bosett,' 06ii nr. 0 Be1tdina1s - - o 4tarneys at -Law, ante tpj c ide -simians , _ sewnct ' • 900-HMRDr d--t]rriv&, Rdte 990, Atlantdt, cg?30328 _ . . party: i - ' - (ivaere.er trrd hem" tM ,enr "tint fly" W "-Md ' p? ?arte" dal Irladr iw,.lr W 0„n1 kein, Mpl ?' - resreswtatlets, sad airier d INi.i3,W, a.d low weary. ud ask" M eyeivb ar ewtrat . r adoiY ? ?i?.) That the said- firsl parlX„for and in eoneideratton of the sum of S In land rsald by the saO second party. the reetipt w6reof>ts hereby aclmoudeelgeff, does beinbt rmi se, ya. Base and quit-cldLn unto t6 said second party forever, all'ths, right, title, Interest, elapst onddimand which - the snid first party has In and to the foftowing described lot. piety or parcel of land, situate, tying and being in tiro County of . Pinellas State 4 Florida . to-wit. °-All ?o€-the grai>ttar's interest in and 'tog t ' - From the'SW corner of the-4E 1/4'of Setition 18, Township. 29 Sbuth; Ra11ge 16 East, null S 89.4 '40" 55'.,EaIt t,'al6ng the, is :?wcyo Ekst-West center line of said Section 18,• 200:0 ft. for - P.0'.B. ; thence continue S ,890 40' 55" Zgst,: along the East ----?'' West center line -of 'said Section. 18,'i -324.57° ft. to - the r center :line :of Kilmer Ave. ; ; thence N IQ 0.1' 28" Eaat-, - 1 "- o along- the center line of Dilater ;Ave.,. 330'.03 fem. to tile- - r==- South ,line- of Gulf, to Bay Acres first Addition ,art recorded. • F' id Plat Book 32, Page: 55,::af therPt4blic Records of Pinellas ' ' . =` -=-? 'County thence' N 89°t 41!• 18" West; - a]1Dn the South • g ?0 line of 'said Golf to Bay Acres. First :Addi6on?_3?4.50 ft: ;• ,s-thence S t° 13" Waist-330.02-ft. to the P.O,fl: Less /- ._?_• i ! the. South 50.0 ft. and the East 30.0 ft-for, road figlit-of- C __1 way, - '--' _ - J • = Thie quit claim deed oostfitma the 'grasntor's• intention to_oonvey all of her' intBrest, in. the abovv-des=ibed parcel_ iz her deed dated Daoai Ar 30, 1992, c 47 fire=&d ,Lh _0 X_ l *_8136, -Page 306,Pinel'las axulty, Floridts, public , --- r7i` 14 PL? 106 ? i " W No ripe :ante together with all, and stnl ulas t6i ° a° g appurterwrtat. t?1.J v • belonging or 1a• anywise'bpperlaining, and all Ih'e estate, 694 Itite,'intereal; lien, -gully and claim u+lWt? r - tpsetroe of the said first ;itar-iypiit?ier in. law or rgatliy, to the only: properiaut, bdrtifti pnd_behbof of?he taro;- P. second porgy f orevsr. -:k?' •?' ZpU[[pf The atlld fiisl porty'kas signrd an ,si'aled these presrpts the doW w :Signed&*GW and delivered In rvionce -61: A .........._............ _ ....... ' Print Nash:. D. Jones Pauline 1... lilt Nl+Ktlei'OJ1e5 : ........o...,•...:Y...... .......... ......:........?.................... a STATE OF FLORIDA, c COUNTY -OF . , PnjaZ M ! HEREBY CERTIFY ghat ,on this day, before Bite, no officer .duty, au"riled in the State aloresod and in tkt County a(aeesaid so take sikttowledkmtnts, perwnall>' appeared" i - 1 f PAIA.II??JV.00`44IE - . • _ * - s _ c C-D to me rtown loelxe person described -in and who. esteuted the foregoing -instiument and 5 acknawledsed °J E before me that, she t:geeuted the same, ?. WITNESS my hand, and:ditcial seal in the County and Stale last afarruid this 11 6y of - ..April, A. D, 1994 ? QI+T ALMA 1. 40 32M • , y? -, Yr t>atrtteatott 1 CC tx ?../ ,• . '' t>?g• 1lasanlar@Y. tYlt ' a f essero • era tgtr rt101s Ulsuaaeua - --Ts j"' H •• thin /nuruarKnl ?Irpamd by: Milton D. Jones, Attorney aI +9_ 501 S. Ft. Harrison Ave., Suite 206 aG Addnt u Clearwater, Florida 34616 KARLEEN _F. DEBCAKER,w -C? ERK 1 RECORD VERIFIED BY: lCL?d . s . Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 0& Page 2 of 7 18 / 29 18 / 00000 / 130 I 0400 17-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:14:46 . Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales ROPHIE, ALAN OBK: 08632 OPG: 0326 ROPHIE, RALPH BETECH, CECILA COHEN, CHERYL C/O ALBA CONSULTING CORP 1420 COURT ST EVACUATION ZONE: NONE CLEARWATER FL 33756-6147 Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD of Jan 1, 2004, based an Census Tract: 267.03 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/Unq) Vac/Imp Plat Information 0 10 0/ 0 0 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 621,500 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 621,500 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem; 0 Taxable: 621,500 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District; Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View; 04 Millage; 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes; 14,275.48 1) 150 x 280 12.00 42, 000.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 14, 275.48 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be ; 14,275.48 Short Legal E i50FT OF W 494.57FT OF N 28OFT OF S 330FT OF SW 1/4 Description OF HE 1/4 CD r)? Cif Building Information , SFP 0 2035 I' UL IJ RmWNG & DEVLL,iP?.;? F-N T SVCS r i-v nc ri r http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &p=18+29+16+00000+130+0910262%2... 5/17/2005 Pinellas County Property Appoi er Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 Page 4 of 7 18 / 29 / 16 / 80080 / 130 / 9490 :02 17-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:14:47 Commercial Card 02 of 3 Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 410 KILMER AUE Prop Use: 339 Land Use: 27 S?rucural Elemen-ts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 18 Party Wall 30% Common Wall Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Unfinished Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 4 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 11959 Effective Age 35 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArezaS Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 6,000 7) . 00 0 2) . 00 0 8) . o0 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C ommer v i a l Extra F e at ur e s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #3 CS? 0 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &p=18+29+16+00000+130+0910262%2... 5/17/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr*r Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 00 Page 5 of 7 18 / 29 / 18 / 00000 / 130 / 0400 :03 17-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:14:37 Commercial Card 03 of 3 Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 410 KILMER AUE Prop Use: 339 Land Use: 27 S?ruc?ural E1em?n-ts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall 30% Common Wall Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Unfinished Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 0 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,966 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3aS Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 3,000 7) . 00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) 00 0 9) 00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 G ammercial Extra F6aTilreEm- Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map F*]H5f]TFqFq r C. http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &p=18+29+16+00000+130+0910262%2 70 G) 5/17/2005 Pinellas County Property App0er Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 Page 6 of 7 STREET 1 NASH STREET w z ? w z W STREET ; a WHiTWN STREET Ell Lfl+ STREET CHAUCER STREET ? W _J sic: ' T2 W - ? ?C STREET dal TT 0 0 5HELLEY SIREEI 3 z W 11, ! 1 + 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) BAY ?x CD http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &p=18+29+16+00000+130+0910262%2... 5/17/2005 GULF To in Pinellas County Property Appis er Information: 18 29 16 00000 130 00 Page 7 of 7 ° it yy ; Cd,?g K ro. ,.tea= s.7' Pinellas County Property Appraiser n y in- Parcel Information G-) .._-? ?.....e..,.-.?.-.._..... .. _..... .. ,ee--??c { A t .._ -_... ..., _?s 0 2U373 (,.,y (it t:'t? ., G: i3af3 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &p=18+29+16+00000+130+0910262%2... 5/17/2005 v s • r i >? zw Ji ` a a rev ? k . f F-?s•,r?.'ti ,? r: ?T v... ?s9°'. ? a .? x . ? G ??4 O ? LwJ t ...?? t ? ? ? ? V E ? ? f ? ?-•-? /V/L Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc. PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed project amounts to re-establishment of a historical use (Vehicle Service) on the subject property located at 2430 Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard (SR 60), Clearwater, Florida. Planning Staff has indicated that this project will only be considered by application under the Comprehensive Infill category since the Vehicle Service Use is not allowed in the Commercial (C) Zoning District. Hence, Comprehensive Infill will allow the subject use via the IRT Zoning District Criteria, The property is presently occupied by a 9,000 SF concrete block building with adjacent parking and similar neighboring uses. The building was originally constructed by American Motros Corporation and utilized for Vehicle Service and Repair activities. The building was later used by Lokey Motor Company as a Body Shop and Auto Repair facility. The present owner is the Rophie Family Partnership, c/o ALBA Consulting Corporation (,XL:B.A). ALBA is assisting the owners as the Agent to process a Flexible Development Application for this Comprehensive Infill Project, to gain approval from the City of Clearwater to lease the 9,000 SF building to a prospective tenant, DC Customs. DC Customs plans to add an interior mezzanine for 635 SF of office space for a total usable floor area of 9,635 SF. DC Customs is a Specialized Vehicle Service Use which operates a business that provides for customizing automobiles. The subject services include installation of custom wheels; rims, window tinting, stereo equipment, and detailed body work DC Customs is expected to be a lower intensity use than the historical uses in the building. In addition, the adjacent uses to the south, east and west are Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Advance Auto Parts (Repair) and -- "A to Z" Auto Care, respectively. Both Advance Auto Parts (Repair) and "A to Z" Auto Care operate (6) service bays. Each of these businesses performs all types of vehicle repairs, with activities being performed at the bay openings or outside.. DC Customs proposes activities in a completely enclosed garage area away from view to adjacent properties. The vehicles to be serviced will be secured in a fenced compound temporarily awaiting transfer to garage area. The services employ trained technicians, utilize high-end equipment & parts and require an interior environment to assure quality installation. No outside activities are proposed. It k should be noted that all vehicles being serviced are stored inside the garage at night due to insurance 'p.: mandates for protection of the expensive merchandise being installed in the vehicles. As part of this application, the owners have proposed to improve driveway access to the property and parking which will prevent congestion on the roadway and will improve internal circulation. The driveway & parking improvements will cause "A to Z" Auto Care to remove approximately (15) junk vehicles from the subject property. In coordination, the parking area proposed will be fenced and landscaping will be provided to buffer the property from the single family residential properties on the north side of Shelley Street. In addition, the owner is proposing a stormwater quality treatment swale to capture the first one-half inch of runoff from the repaved parking area. The owner is also proposing a 5' sidewalk along Kilmer Avenue. The existing building will be pressure washed and cleaned by the owner. As part of this application, the owner is requesting approval of the following conditions: 1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com 1. The property will be approved for Vehicle Service Use in the C Zoning District based on site planned deviations from the Commercial General Standards (Code Section 2-701 and 2-702) for FAR, ISR, Lot Area, Lot Width, Maximum Height, Setbacks and Buffers. Only parking shall be compared to and deviate from that allowed in the IRT Zoning District (Code Section 2-1302) with a standard parking ratio of 1.5 spaces per 1,000 SF of building area. The total proposed GFA for the project will be 9,635 SF which will require (14) parking stalls. However, since only (13) stalls are being proposed, LA Civil and the Applicant have studied the DC Customs operation and concluded further herein this report that only (12) parking stalls will be required. 2. Improvements to the subject property, as requested by the City Staff in conjunction with this application, shall be limited to the portion of the Lot occupied by the 9,000 SF building and NOT the Enterprise Rent-A-Car site. Staff has therefore required that the applicant request approval of a 0-foot (Zero Foot) setback for the existing pavement along the Enterprise Rent-A-Car frontage along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. The required setback according to Staff is 15 feet and will mandate a 15-foot variance. 3. The rear buffer along Shelley Street, abutting the parking, will be allowed to be no less than 9.94' in width except as already exists abutting the dumpster enclosure. 4. The rear buffer along Shelley Street, abutting the parking, will be allowed to be utilized for the proposed 4:1 stormwater treatment swale. 5. (1) 30 SF Tenant Wall Signs will be allowed on south building faceas shown on Sheets 3 & 5 of the Plans. 6. A 6-foot tall opaque fence can be installed surrounding the proposed parking. 7. The total proposed GFA for the project will be 9,635 SF which req PARKING ANALYSIS: DC Customs is the proposed tenant for the building. DC customs provides specialized vehicle service which includes adding audio systems, installing customized interiors, installing tires & rims, and adding body paint and decals. The owner of DC Customs presently operates his business in an industrial & retail center on Ulmerton Road in Largo. He intends to move his business to 2430 Gulf-to-Bay to provide himself with a larger facility and to improve his location. To better identify the parking demand, LA Civil & ALBA recently visited the facility in Largo to observe the operation and assess the parking requirements for DC Customs. The owner explained that he has (7) employees, (8) cars being services and he sees no more than (2) customers visiting his facility at any given time, since he operates by appointment only. He explained that he generally has (5) cars in the service area being worked on, with (3) cars placed outside in the parking lot to provide adequate room in the garage. Hence, his parking demand is simply (7) employees + (2) customers + (3) vehicles to be cPrviced = (12) parking spaces required. The proposed Site Plan provides (13) parking stalls. It should :ed that all vehicles being serviced are stored inside the garage at night due to insurance mandates )r protection of the expensive merchandise being installed in the vehicles. r5 .?I ORONAL "Gu?1vi.1 1 --?.0._. DC CUSTOMS @ 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS V / gam: x LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROJECT CONSULTANTS «<G1N«? WIT"MM'I"A"M CIDR- DAM61 SuRrv[vau: _???.oa?a 1?1M IrD>1p«1M1111 sIX+D I'til',ss-?fi DA N63f LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES LOCATION MAP 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD , CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA DC CUSTOMS ALBA CONSULTING CORP CONTACT : JOHN ATANASIO 1420 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FL 34756 PHONE: 727-443-0718 FAX: 727-447-2369 PREPARED BY: F?- MFD0Vq R A n --- '`? PLA:. 1 Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc. Certificate of Authorization # 00008766 Scott Lincoln, P.E. Fl Reg # 50035 1446 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: 727-446-9000 FAX: 727-446-9050 PLAN SET INDEX I. COVER SF6.ET 1.BOUNOARY SDR\TY ). SIZE PLAN 4. PAVMG, GRADMG ROMINACEIY.AN S. EXISTING BUILpING FlE\'ATION \'IEN'S LI. LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT SITE DATA PROPERTYLOCADON: (PARCELmx 18-6N000011J6,1M00) PROPERTY OWNFA:i. v.uon PRO'E^RT Z'=6??wnrtw,niwmn v.s»in BOIIDP'G SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: n?ns?iit? MAXIMUM BUILD- HEICBI': 1u MAXIMUM FAR/ISR: PARKING SPACES: CO\'ERAGE: (EXISTING: ON DE\TFDPMEMS(IE)? IM, .11, T COVERAGE: (PROPOSED:ON pE\'FTpPMEMSIIE) m? N- li= FLOOD 20NE DATA nvc c?nn» is stws,s? DC MMMS @ GULF TO BAY-D. LA n\'IL we x wam? m a" a ti SITE STORMWATER TREATMENT SHELLY ST o' so' 100' 3 6" VERTICAL SWALE CURBING 15' 2' 13' z° a' 4' 3' SCALE: 1" = 50' PARKING GRASS RR/W STRIP WHEEL?? SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL sTLTP SIT./1?fII APP M ME v o y R 1 DEEP WATER DUALITY SHELLY ST TREATMENT SWAY FOR PROPOSED I r g I NEW PARKING AREA ONLY PEDESTRIAN RAMP SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:I - - LANDING ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER (60' R/W) STANDARDS - - _ mNa I L';=!'" I "' V PER CITY A TRIINQE- LJ?" I (NTS) ... .. .... .. u. a TALL LTNQ V !TT -A 24' LANDSCAPE mtm& /// SECTION A rN89'42'21'W?294.50' . \S _ Q?FF PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE A TO Z W/ CpTE rt ! L... 8 A s L / ; AUTO FIRE EXISTING SITE LEGEND C BUILDING USE DATA CARE I SIOEWAU< ° 1273, FlYDRANT HANDICAP PARKING LS I\ ,/ / /?. 11 Q °-f CANOPY y' CONC ETE d BUILDING COMPONENT / RR PROPOSED DRAINAGE INLET ® STORAGE / PARTS 6888 8 SF MY""'r,? s I GREEN 60 `/6... SD?N'A4K, O u? V PROPOSED CURB OFFICE / WAITING 416 SF I [ !1': y{ ° xa.ns'@ „ Em SITE BOUNDARY UNE ?...?...? DISPLAY 740 SF Y I I? © V TORAH 6' STRPED le '. x+ ! PARTS s I OS ] WALK 5 CENTER LINE OF ROAD --- PAINT BOOTH 2,576 SFi 10. s A 6 0 11 __ ................ VEHICLE SERVICE AREA 4.580 GARAGE A: FOR VEHICLE s. AIN ENTRY N 6 ° LL RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICE PARKING AJ430 ? _ .I ZC <{? y 11 EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT .... ..... .._ -..... _.. TOTAL 9,000 SF ?24I3e ttl ".. n II U $'g=2 ?T PROPOSED CONCRETE ?. ( rce0 O _ RCDUC1' . uste ?R s DISPLAY TYPICAL TYP w ............... __ ., A ....... p ?. HANDICAP HG SIGN LEGEND " F c N,89 i PAINT BOOTH iWAn/ al !I NO TE%T OR SYMBOL 510 q / PARKING SPACES A o a it w w 100' _ W O R1-1 STOP TURN "'t 24'.2 0' ! SIDEWAU( 5/W l OCR R3-1 NO RIGHT 4' ,O .,. I - `? 'Y R3-7 LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT 30'.30" !`V I i - '? a Jil 5' RADIUS RS' RS-1 00 NOT ENTER 30".30• ........... :I ? R6-i ONE WAY 36•x12" ?I ?...:.... .A. ?__ _.... ,.- _ _. _..._._...........___ III I IS R3-SR RIGHT TURN ONLY 24'.24' N I I. ,,. N.? - II ? W LINEAR FEET lF ..F.>:S71tiG AUTO m ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL ON UU<I?IE`,;ti L_.J 30 SFO W mil„ 0 SOLIARE FEET SF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. RETAIL HOPS ' I TENANT • w l I V A H GENERAL NOTES ! EX:<p:hTERy \?_.. WALL ILL. STRIPING NOTES 1. ALL CURB RADII TO BE } UNLESS OTHERWISE I ENTERPRISE s II i dl; 42a2A 12426 42i 1. TYPICAL PARKING SPACE SHALL BE STRIPED ;74115 #242.2.: NOTED. RENT-A-CAR s C7 WITH A 4' WHITE STRIPE. I ,a • w I I WIDE 2. ALL CURB TO BE 6' VERTICAL CURBING. L. ;I.. .. ;.L l ALK 1111 f P NPRE 1 IDEW 2. SEE DETAILS FOR HANDICAP PARKING. e . C C E T: i i 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED FROM FACE OF -- V• ti ,I. AN...N.a it N CURB. N II ? ? w FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY NOTES Ll NT'r.:R LOT LINE 44.571 LOT LINE 1LO I 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING 1.SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS ADJACENT - - - - - - - I ' H JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPUCANT OF TO OR A PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE ---? S89'40'31'E 294.58' r PROPOSED\ I R THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF COMPUANCE WITH THE FLORIDA DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED CONSISTENT WITH DRIVEWAY -J ( , DRIVEWAY "-+' - DRIVEWAY PEOESTRIA?'?,,l FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT ::.' ::. ........ ........ .-.- .-..-.-.-..-.-.-..-..-..~.. ..-_=4p --'__ -----e6tY-- -. RAMP SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS INDEX 09 U 2. THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION INCLUDING THE A.D.A. (TRUNCATED DOM S PER ............... -XISTING- ._.._EXISTING .__. _ _............. SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPOSED PROJECT D.O.T. INDEX /304.) GULF p A Q/?1 FIRE HYDRANT PEOESMIAN DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. _........TO BAY....(S.R _6..01 .............. ........... RAMP Q 2.A NY NEW OR REPLACED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY .... ............... .. ............... ............... ................ 3. THE PROJECT SHALL MEET NFPA 30 A REDUIREMENTS APRON(S) CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE (100' R/W) EXISTING FOR REPAIR GARAGE 2000 EDITION. ........... RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE A MINIMUM 6' THICK ........... ........... _ ._............... _ _,............. ............... ........... _...._NRATE............... ... F- -...... _ O j W , I .. ... .... .... ... . .... .... .... .. .. ...- _ "- ... - _ ... ... .... -, ..-- +-------- - ............ INLET .. ?" . . , FIBRO WITH 65X6' / 0 %NO MINIMUM 3000 W 4 APPROVAL OF AN ENGINEERED SPRAY BOOTH SHALL ,1.y.J1 BE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHALL PRIOR TO SHALL NOT TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THIS -----------------. .......__.... ............... .............. ...... ...._... ............... INSTALLATION............... ........_..... .__... _._......... a F ti H . APRON AREA(S)]. REFER TO CITY OF 5. NO CUSTOMER ACCESSABLE PARKING SHALL BE CLEARWATER CONTRACT.SPE..CATIONS LAND. .... .. .. .... .... . .............. ..... .... ..... ...... ...,. STANDARDS'IADE% 103. ALLOWED INSIDE BUILDING. I SHEET No. ! 1 U 203-j E i SITE STORMWATER ' SHELLY ST 0. 50' loo, TREATMENT 6" VERTICAL SWALE CURBING ?p? } 15' 2' 13' I T 1 SCALE: 1" = 50' STORMWATER CALCULATIONS THE PROPOSED STOOMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT SWALE IS DESIGNED TO TREAT THE FIRST 1/2 INCH RUNOFF FROM THE SHADED PRKINC AREA TO BE RESURFACED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT: PARKING AREA a 5.060 SF TREATMENT VOLUME - (0.5 INCHES / 12 INCHES PER FT) • 5.060 SF TREATMENT VOLUME . 211 CF OF STORAGE REQUIRED NO ATTENUATION VOLUME IS REQUIRED SINCE THE IMPERVIOUS AREA OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE REDUCED BASED ON THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. PROPOSED SWALE CAPACITY: VOLUME - 616 SF(TOP) + 0 SF (BOT) t / 2 • V DEEP 409 CF GRADING LEGEND ELEVATION EL TYPICAL TYP CLEANOUT CO INVERT ELEVATION IE HANDICAP HC EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION -0 DRAINAGE INLET MITERED END SECTION O PROPOSED SWALE STORMWATER FLOW ?•'? EXISTING SWALE STORMWATER FLOW ?'•'?' PROPOSED VALLEY FLOW SURFACE STORMWATER FLOW DIRECTION OF STORM WATER FLOW STORM DRAIN SO HELICALLY CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE HCAP ELLIPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ERCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RCP POLY VINYL CHLORIDE PIPE PVC FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FFE SIDEWALK S/W - STORM SEWER STRUCTURE NUMBER 5-50 EROSION CONTROL - •- - -• PROPOSED HIGH POINT --- - rte. • n C' 1 r? SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -nomATE R%W Uw - - - - V DEEP WATER OUAUTY SHELLY ST TREATMENT SWALE FOR o NEW PARKING G AREA ONLY. f (60' R/W) SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 _ _ _ A a Y N89'42'21'W 294.50' \ GIB !.. I ! I I A j 1.1 I _ AUTO m 1 THE 5,am s AREA mom KDtwN a C I CARE I +? °"A" ?"A? K W ?I ?i V />-i : I S'TgIMWAIER SWAtE FOR TIIEAiMENT I I ? X F` l5 O i VIa ( x < i II ??- C ga i:X15'INl ?? II; O egmg i MIT` ' ? ?c I M ;I V 28 RE!'unut Y r. _ITY; d OS R I a I r I I ! I II I ? ?3`S O I L_.....__.....___.r ? co E;Ku U _.... .... _.... ... ?` I 0243C II V • I II I II ? ``9?? r I ar of of I ? ................... ?I? I .I W r? •_ y ?o I .. - ---- (:x,151'1+1G nu TO w •? I II II 6 ? m J RETAIL SHOPS Ji fiEN?nL LIY)I^$iEiS j I Lu _J !I C d I i II Z Vf i ?"'? W r Tn:U `.:T?;p {:F.!vTf.'r% '-' I r .? I I Fm LL ? I1;??:,;> 2.20 W'2412, W"LA24; ry24;i Li, as j ENTERPRISE s ! !; ab ° c'a a ! n O I o? RENT • /BAR I ? d o I !I. I r ?? I EXSTI."; AUT i Z .... .. ... _ .. _.. _ .. _I W .... ... __... ' PEN fAL. PA;t'Y,ING II N F . I II '. .IZ t .I II I? D 2C `I c:r::N I n I II ?I\ N co) U F' ANI I LLOT LINE 44.57 1 1 LOT LINE 100' J J S89.40'31'E 294.58' k? ,_. .., •••?•••-•••?• ..............._..-------------------------'--` d GULF TO BAY (SR 60) ° (100' R/W? H - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 4 H 0 20jz h _ J1 s ? i aaml Aeufmo A NT ?' ?, ? g O R n n " n••n u 8 T U T MAIL ]IW .,-. - } ..? .. .r - flow ?e q J w z ?y A SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION WEST BUILDING ELEVATION _ MIpltECRRK fl µ AT ROOF UNFD t 30 5F TMANT WALL SON-\ (mum FACE OF elno) ENTIRE FACE OF awcRD m ee PIN MW WADED ..._._... _. ANO l4FMFD By OWNER T Q m 3 ENTIRE K FADE of euUIHED ,.. r M M eE wAwm - f AND CLEANED DY DYMER ?? VEHICLE PAINT eoom Er10 .._.._ .. ..«..... )». ... ,... \..?,:.... ?s.:.? r f < \ J MDOr lfJiiF]t3 ? (? ?,, , 1? 2?ti ?.eal swig 111, U two, "? ?? .. .. O 1? N ge ' t NOW A O } u iY ' Imo' E \ `wtac eenNCC PM "T D" At ! ? \ O m ...?j z f l \\ QO>fD IX111Y DOg1 , C .J - ID"T' DOOR ,- m eE uaw Awa KILMER AVE ¦m a wuc i ? y t+'7 ,?{(3?-J?ORw+.4•? PKPOSD 1?'A1 DDOR1 / .. LANDS •?' y??, , iF . « YTN Y 'mx ATMIq , .?e wAmzAMC,u1 ETOMPA i TIE hDAND OVERRAY D cLVt P.Ng9 MFA 10 EC {VYJD-I SHELLEY STREET cw ?4111 Illy AM UPIp3C/Pm RiN lLY GF ipLY1 • 18U1(T 44RL TAYIY gcune ILK "M" r33 rr z . t ry '1 1 . ;.'f 4. 1'.i ?]9f, 4 Ste } . t '"? t ? ? 1? M T ••:ik' ~ r . ? y •_"} F U W _._-_., f ? - _ =?'Y. w it. ? t.t?•1?L .1i•. - ..., , ? i. ?-?F ?. J C F . ] S N , . _ . aF mF NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION EAST BUILDING ELEVATION SHE N°. r,:, r ? ? (' , 1r S -IV N I I-., I\ I ?? ^ ? ? ? ZvJJ VI J - a I APPROMMATE R/W LIRE 1' DEEP WATER QUALITY SHELLY ST TREATMENT SWALE FOR NEW PARKING AREA ONLY. (60' R/W) SIDE SLOPES TO HE 4:1 _ _ A 3 0 ? 1A "I w I N89'42'21"W 294.50 ! --?- 30'I ATO Z A AA AUTO CARE w -Elm ° Z3 4 a Q L L M N Q U C "" I I i ? 32 o v nB n7° ' a(4 ........... .._.. ... 20 D: 1 rn Oi ZI J I .1 a N W O OI i N ;? '2O' N Z p o t E 4 T :N _? o i RETAIL SHOPS T W N - I W W ` aQ ENTERPRISE P ( s < ^ RENT A CAR Z + u O I< T J APKFI, ;Ir „ `-;1 N LOT LINE 44.571 LOT LINE 100' _ I LOT?INf,•1?,Q;••_•• ?...?..•? .•. •_•••? 589'40'31"E 294.58 w? fI -- - - - . - - - - . tom: -. . GULF TO BAY (SR 60) (100' R/W) F?ff I I ' I I •GENERALLAND5CAPE NOTES Honda / 1 nr xtte, am insralke to x?gFest nu.sery staMres. Pbnt_ swl be w plrta enll be cu?? g'ow^ ocept a: noted m pan. 3 ?sxaM1? m?wNnatw? gattm ? Fe.eetrrtwrrM1a?rUn,nrs x'?ioo+u a„e ea,ti ?? ruin mam?n:romm?,d z•. d .. -- 5: So msn/be 95S. rice nee 5[. aagnbrc'FlwHm', ?rtstanN.arn agMtwota. 6. ked q the landsope Cw2rxtor pro, w wnsnuc[im rnN am aw rcpan.U u the Wxapc a.cni4a. ?a?amtney wx xztrctrotq rhea l.,escape AZnreecwN?spetted ac?e,itva msuuaeuonle out q?[FC IanGSCapc CaRraao- at ro adetma cast. ms d muv'e a Tanges to Ne eranys ar spit M1r?4ms sFa b 9. tsarcm prondedgtne ins ng nattw ud capwfrzly rtxed otne?x+ce.. ti0 Comracw ?denhM1rn?an be tall wn . ea a, sna a '?"s sxu Hat be a1a«<e? one?ten. a. a spec ans ?cant? 4ea w am? q?,w ma, wrN??,plant ?g ae a GmNama. sna wane „ at?a, aM ad? tin a perod d ? da,?,ar 5. Ia qNn r?bw rcparanrnts sha be made a, irtee peaod seal bc9^Wa^mte dcompe[m. a ?d>ny eeMercaes by the owrcr a Nurq ' ?? davpe Co.nxtw wNn 0 wanq days cpon 6I at gcestars,ryAng Ne laiesege Banc ? Spmf rx«mi sN be dr<cted to the lanes?pe t e nzm ]o] ze.o. FERTILIZATION anrvb anderr nsw nno ep ?t Pt badble`av?wxn ung"fomr 20. 55partnq tabttcattmc of p.nt nq ane pronto Ne mdue m an d tM mo[ bau.51u ne pxee mawmy a,aw tFe,am W 4 depth [ ut n brtwre. Apphcrt on Rat - Ga m CmMnw'. 2 bet 5 G4tc?an?nR. v tts m nn: 3-21 q btts ] G.1 4 m Lmta w. 2 ircm 3 yrxF 2dperdwnt ?Gram?wer aws gra..4rvv yeas nn rcee.+e le.txutnn wtn tlmwv[e' nme,eease IntF?ze. p<, manulaawets spec fea[ws. .i Lull c C? ' arm.... a??w ..... YI? ? uw '° a ay O ? Q 9= E) TREE PLANTING DETAIL ?\ iREE PROTECTION DETAIL O Q LL Lu Ll L V cu 75 v u o< y as ?rt wM 0 N M U I /1 511RUB PIANTING DETAIL ? Plant Materials Schedule a v -t Quantity Code 15--lName 5pecifcaton Spacng td E j 3 44 "15 h brxus spp. Ltib xus 3 gal- 24' x 24" 30" o.c. U Q ttl 7 ICU It, cornuta buelordu Burford 110 ly 3 gal., 24' x 24' 30' o. c. C LL tWai 200 LAM Lanaty spp Yellow Lantana 1 gal., 12' ht. x 12',p, . b' o c Ly ) ''F 9 L I Lagerstrocm a nd?ca Crape Myrtle a M. x 5 spr, 2.5 cal. J N t Q 45 LMM Lrope Muscar It- Grass I gal.. 12' nt. x 12" zpr. I B' o.c. X 130 LMG Lr ope Musrar Gant Lnope 1 ga., 1ht a 12'spr. Ib c O 125 JP Jun pervs Parson Parsons Juniper 3 9,1- 12' nt. x t 8'sp 3C .c. D L`Q?'.- 50 POM Poear?rpus spp. Podocarpus 3 gaL 24' ht. x 24• sp 30 o c. Q 39 RI Raph o ep s nd ca nd an Hawthorn 3 ga b' ht. x I8' sp 3a o.c. 100 TN Tracnclospeospervnum Jasm nodes yar. CoMedera[e Jasmine 3ga1_ 8'ht.x IU.". 30'o. c. 20 TN Trachermum as?aticum Dwarf Contederate Jasmine 1 gal., G. ht. a IT spr. 18' o.c. 7 _ rhinos alata H. 12' ht. a 4' spr. 2.5" cal. LANDSCAPE b zru mina f"', as Cardboard Palm 7 g,1., 30' x 30• 31' o.c. ARCHITECT. n?//?JyGJ?y{?p?(J??/ Hama. tans. u F. 727 7854017 -- 0 25 ' sa loo' 3 e tM.t nA".. ca"oe rvo. uon w Scale 1" = 50'-0" 'SHEET' FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: `7 'T h DSO Phone: FROM: --? n?n Ph DATE:0 9 ' SUBJECT:'Dc, C k,45+VM S MESSAGE: Inn D;19 0?. 0. NUMBER OF PAGESONCLUDING THIS PA Sep. 14 2005 11:07AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94469050 Sep.14 11:06AM 01'22 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS ' MB4L1' ##04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 10#25 am Case Number: FLD2005-0/075 -- 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Owner(s): Alan Rophie C/O Alba Consulting Corp Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email ,,11 n ?t-t C? ? Y t 1 C.? Representative: Alba Consulting S 1 i n e,o1 @ 1420 Court Street Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-443-0718, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 0.964 acres locate at the southwest corner of the intersection of Kilmer Avenue and Shelly Street Atlas Page: 290B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to allow vehicle service major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district, including reduction to front (north) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 11.39 feet, a six foot tall non-opaque fence in two required front setbacks (north and east), and to allow one of the fourteen required parking spaces inside the building, as a Comprehensive Infill Project. Proposed Use: Vehicle service, major Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: ????Sufficient with revisions bringing setback reductions and landscape buffers along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue into compliance. In addition, include the reduction of site visibility triangles at garage exits onto Kilmer Avenue. The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I , 1. Show on the plan 20-foot sight triangles where vehicles exiting garage enter Kilmer Avenue. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Provide a copy of a recorded cross access agreement with adjoining property owner that is (? 5 binding upon successive property owners. 2. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 3. Any new or replaced concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. [sidewalks shall NOT to be constructed within this apron area(s)]. Refer to City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #103. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . No Issues Fire: I . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 2 . North Drive needs 24 foot width for entry and drive aisle and 30 degree entry and exit radius. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 3 . Meet NFPA 30 A requirements for repair garage 2000 Edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 4. Show more detail on Entry / Exit from Gulf to Bay. PRIOR TO CDB 5 . Engineered Spray Booth Required. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 6. No customer accessable parking to be allowed inside building. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 13 Harbor Master: • • No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: I , Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. 2. Note: Location of attached sign on Kilmer Avenue appears to be blocked from view by the proposed tree. Parks and Recreation: No issues - new vehicle service within existing bldg; less than one acre. Stormwater: I , No issues Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 , 1) Provide site distance triangles per Community Development Code section 3-904. 2) Two (2) required parking spaces inside garage do not meet City of Clearwater dimension standards (24-foot drive aisle required). All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: 1 . Proposed canopy over front entrance on Kilmer Avenue cannot exceed 40% of the 25 foot setback (10 feet). 2. Clarify. How does the reduction in front setback result in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance and landscaped areas in excess of the minimum required. 3 . Clarify. How the physical characteristics of the building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. 4. How is the facade of the building which fronts on public roads designed with windows, cornices or other architectural features or treatments? 5 . Clarify. How the design of the parcel proposed for development is compatible with the surrounding area. 6. Signage proposed will require a seperate, Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) approval to increase the number of attached signs from one to two. Please note that CSP looks at all signs on the property, including the Enterprise Rent A Car business. 7. Revise request to include front setback reductions for the Enterprise Rent A Car portion of the property and provide a Comprehensive Landscape plan for the landscape reductions. Note: staff will not support the setback or landscape reductions for the Enterprise Rent A Car portion of the property. 8 . Provide hours of operations. 9. Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 14 Conditions Associated With FLD2005-07075 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4585 08/21/2005 1. Provide a copy of a recorded cross access agreement with adjoining property owner that is Not Met binding upon successive property owners. 2. Show on the plan 20-foot sight triangles where vehicles exiting garage enter Kilmer Avenue. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 2. Any new or replaced concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. [sidewalks shall NOT to be constructed within this apron area(s)]. Refer to City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #103. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Heather Faessle 562-4897 08/22/2005 No Issues Not Met Fire Condition Leonard Rickard 562-4327 08/19/2005 `''PLEASE NOTE""" REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION Not Met SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. Acknowledge PRIOR TO COB 08/19/2005 North Drive needs 24 foot width for entry and drive aisle and 30 degree entry and exit radius. Not Met Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 08/19/2005 Meet NFPA 30 A requirements for repair garage 2000 Edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Not Met 08/19/2005 Show more detail on Entry / Exit from Gulf to Bay. PRIOR TO CDB Not Met 08/19/2005 Engineered Spray Booth Required. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Not Met 08/19/2005 No customer accessable parking to be allowed inside building. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Not Met Operation Hours John Schodtler 727-562-4547 08/25/2005 Provide hours of operations. Not Met Landscape Curbing Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 08/25/2005 Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by Not Met the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 Print Date: 08/31/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 2 . _4f • • FLD2005-07075 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 08/25/2005 Note: Location of attached sign on Kilmer Avenue appears to be blocked from view by the Not Met proposed tree. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 08/19/2005 No Issues. Not Met Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 08/18/2005 No issues - new vehicle service within existing bldg; less than one acre. Not Met Storm Water Condition Elliot Shoberg 562-4748 08/17/2005 No issues Not Met Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 08/23/2005 1) Provide site distance triangles per Community Development Code section 3-904. Not Met 2) Two (2) required parking spaces inside garage do not meet City of Clearwater dimension standards (24-foot drive aisle required). All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 08/03/2005 Proposed canopy over front entrance on Kilmer Avenue cannot exceed 40% of the 25 foot Not Met setback (10 feet). 08/25/2005 Clarify. How does the reduction in front setback result in an improved site plan or improved Not Met design and appearance and landscaped areas in excess of the minimum required. 08/25/2005 Clarify. How the physical characteristics of the building are such that the likely uses of the Not Met property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. 08/25/2005 How is the facade of the building which fronts on public roads designed with windows, cornices or Not Met other architectural features or treatments? 08/25/2005 Clarify. How the design of the parcel proposed for development is compatible with the Not Met surrounding area. 08/25/2005 Signage proposed will require a seperate, Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) approval to Not Met increase the number of attached signs from one to two. Please note that CSP looks at all signs on the property, including the Enterprise Rent A Car business. 08/25/2005 Revise request to include front setback reductions for the Enterprise Rent A Car portion of the Not Met property and provide a Comprehensive Landscape plan for the landscape reductions. Note: staff will not support the setback or landscape reductions for the Enterprise Rent A Car portion of the property. Not Met Print Date: 08/31/2005 CaseConditons Page 2 of 2 • • Clearwater U FAX COVER MEMO, CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: rl W n FAX- ?`? 6 ' ?I DS D FROM: ?O ham, S DATE: a g 3 t a SUBJECT: R_V Zo v S-0-707-S: -p e- L LA STOM S MESSAGE: ?Z1 QZC "m m6 P -` NUM13ER OF PAGESONCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3 Moll 1 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE 01 94469050 0 • Aug. 31 2005 08:52AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT Aug.31 08:50AM 01'21 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN-SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR i FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-FE_LP-FAX (435-7329). Case :Number. FLD2005-07075 --?-I3tl GULF TO BAY BLVD 0N%ner(s): Alan Ftophie C/O Alba Consulting Corp Clearwater. Fl 3;756 TELEPHONE: No Phonc, PAX: No Fax. E-MAIL: No Entail Representative: Alba Consulting 1420 Court Street Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-443-0718, FAX: No Fax, E-iNIAIL: No Email Location: 0.964 acres locate at the southwest corner of the intersection of Kilmer Avenue and Shelly Street Atlas Page: 290B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to allow vehicle service major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district; including reduction to front (north) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 1 1.39 feet, a six foot tall non-opaque fence in two required front setbacks (north and east), and to allow one of the fourteen required parking spaces inside the building, as a Comprehensive Infill Project. Proposed Use: Vehicle service, major Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Provide a copy of a recorded cross access agreement with adjoining property owner that is binding upon successive property owners. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 2. Any new or replaced concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. [sidewalks shall NOT to be constructed within this apron area(s)]. Refer to City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #103. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 , No Issues Fire: 1 . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 2. North Drive needs 24 foot width for entry and drive aisle and 30 degree entry and exit radius. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 3 , Meet NFPA 30 A requirements for repair garage 2000 Edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 4 . Show more detail on Entry / Exit from Gulf to Bay. PRIOR TO CDB 5 . Engineered Spray Booth Required. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 32 Legal: No Comments Land Res(urces: . NO Issues. Landscaping Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. 2 . Note: Location of attached sign on Kilmer Avenue appears to be blocked from view by the proposed tree. Parks and Recreation: I _ No issues - new vehicle service within existing bida; less than one acre. Stormwater: I No issues solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: I , I ) Provide site distance triangles per Community Development Code section 3-904. 2) Two (2) required parking spaces inside garage do not meet City of Clearwater dimension standards (24-foot drive aisle required). All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: I . Proposed canopy over front entrance on Kilmer Avenue cannot exceed 40% of the 25 foot setback (10 feet). 2 . Clarify. How does the reduction in front setback result in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance and landscaped areas in excess of the minimum required. 3 . Clarify. How the physical characteristics of the building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. 4. How is the facade of the building which fronts on public roads designed with windows, cornices or other architectural features or treatments? 5 . Clarify. How the design of the parcel proposed for development is compatible with the surrounding area. 6. Signage proposed will require a seperate, Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) approval to increase the number of attached signs from one to two. Please note that CSP looks at all signs on the property, including the Enterprise Rent A Car business. 7. Provide hours of operations. Other: . r r?0- 4_ . Qn -I'e ^J C ISG?uSs rr Gr-mss S A? ?Fi?w??`? . No Comments Notes: Sufficient with revisions bringing setback reductions and landscape buffers along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue into compliance. /TG -4! A ef j a;v j-J?5 uy?i K, /Met , Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 33 Clearwater August 05, 2005 Alba Consulting 1420 Court Street Clearwater, F133756 CITY OF CLARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. C OM RE: FLD2005-07075 -- 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Alba Consulting : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07075. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Comolete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner I Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-07075 - 2430 GULF TO BAYBLVD V _ lu • Aug. 05 2005 01:51PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94472369 Aug.05 01:51PM 00'41 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). August 5, 2005 John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Letter of Incompleteness FLD2005-07075 DC Customs 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Clearwater, FL Dear Mr. Schodtler: On behalf of the applicant, Alba Consulting Corporation, LA Civil is submitting a response to the following "Incompleteness" comments received from you in your letter dated 8/3/05. Comment is Provide a tree survey or written documentation stating why a tree survey is not required. Response 1: No tree survey is being provided for the project since no (zero) trees exist on the property as described in the legal description for this project, and as demonstrated on the submitted survey. Comment 2: Note: Subsequent to the BPRC meeting you were told that review for compliance with Code would encompass the entire property. Response 2: As discussed at BPRC and as referenced in the legal description in the application, we understand that the City will be considering the entire eastern Lot 3 (Parcel.ID # 18/29/16/00000/130/0400:03) regarding code compliance. However, we have explained to staff that no improvements are proposed on the portion of the Lot occupied by Enterprise Rent-A-Car due to legal conflicts that will be created with the Tenant's long-tern lease. If you have any quest' s or comments regarding the above referenced material, please give me a call. /""1 Sincerely, LA Civil Scott CC: John Atanasio, Alba Consulting 1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727) 446-9000 - Fax.: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com Scott, see below. Please call me with regard to the (2) Incompleteness Comments we received today. As I stated in my voice mail, there are NO Trees on the Site. Hence, we should not need a tree survey as it would contain no trees. Written documentation is required to be submitted to several of the board members for review of the case. Voicemail is not acceptable. You may fax it to me 727-562-4865 or email it before the end of today. Secondly, we were told at our BPRC meeting that the petition would look at the immediate Lot occupied by Enterprise Rent A Car and the 9,000 SF former Lokey Body Shop building (presently proposed to be DC Customs). This is the lot we are referring to, the lot as described by the survey and legal description. Hence, our plan shows this Lot and both uses. The owner will, however, be extremely limited in is options to make any improvements to the Enterprise Rent A Car portion of the Lot without risking problems with the Enterprise lease. We are requesting that you consider the improvements proposed for the DC customs project, and that some change is better than no change to the property. This was only a note for your knowledge. It will not make the application incomplete. Scott, I encourage you to provide a response to the trees today if possible, as I will be away on vacation for two weeks and another planner will be taking care of anything that come in after today. John Schodtler Clearwater August 03, 2005 Alba Consulting 1420 Court Street Clearwater, Fl 33756 *CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM RE: FLD2005-07075 -- 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Alba Consulting p H A A +4 ji s i v The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005707075. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide a tree survey or written documentation stating why a tree survey is not required. 2. Note: Subsequent to the BPRC meeting you were told that review for compliance with Code would encompass the entire property. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Tuesday, August 9, 2005 (2:00pm). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ?4 1 Jo Schodtler Planner I Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-07075 - 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Aug. 03 2005 02:51PM YOUR LOGO : CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. : 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94472369 Aug.03 02:51PM 00'41 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). FLD2005-07075 2430 Gulf to Bay Boulevard 9/27/2005 ?r 1 r, , 1116 115 6 r N N -- I ' ; I I -- r r WHITMAN ST j 211 I I r? j ?JTI L j r I i - r-?p0 I I I Q a n •o J_? I 21 1 T i 204 L- I_ I ? 1 20s I I L--- L_ I r __ 1--!216 216 2W_I 12 t I __I L,J L __I_, r-Z Q I L121 2 I I I ? -f' L? -1 I 1 Q J-_1216 1 I Q? LJ I-1 0' I oel N 1 -t L I-L__? _r , _ I •+?I v u, ?'Ir °?I NI I 211 . ? L___j __ r__ I I I r-, F, r1 j 2tr?7 r_I? , IL CHAUCER ST ---t W 307-i - , - sal ; I a v'7 f--; , =8 1-?$, -- L N N IN I I N N j I I I N I 1 r-I I I - I , - ? 1- , i-? I, l N, I I I 1 I I I r-?I , rl 1 j L 1 L__? 1 1-? I L ' i r u rr 1 -- 1 1 I X1 _ 1 1 I -1 3?g , I I --- `- -?I L_I ?1 1 L__! , 3ir--1 1 r - i I I °v L_ J I_ c r, LI i--? i'--I_ i t I-- , fol I u6 1 h' I ?1' N L_,,? I 1 L- e 1 - I I N V N 370 j, `p -= N N L-, = 'I 310 ---- 1 I I 401----j I t I I ? i _1 I U -0 U GULF-TO-B BL C GULF-TO-BAY B VD N__ -_ I N I I i_I i N F I I L, W ,- I-1 L--- 1 L r __ J i i , Z L_ 1__J I 1 r f-_ I N 509 :. 2 I r y- r-? I Lr? L__, I 1 L- I 5TH ST , I? f -3 '_-? _ 11 I- ! - -- O 513 I- L --; 1 ?- J W ?`, I N 51 1-, _l J 1___I TH 1 r I---' 1-J I13 0 1 Zoning Map Owner: Rophie Family Partnership I Case: FLD2005-07075 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property 0.964 Size (Acres): DC Customs PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Atlas Page: 290B S:\f-tanning Department\C D B\forms and shells\Map request forms2003\FLD Map request form.doc a pq ?=-!? Owner: I Rophie Family Partnership Case: FLD2005-07075 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property Size(Acres) : 0.964 DC Customs PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Atlas Page: 290B s: \manntng uepartment\c U Et\torms and shells\Map request forms2003\FLD Map request form.doc O ? P MARILYN ST SHARKE Y, pp SHARIB:V RD $5 ? ? U ArNA AVE 5 SS S? a > a LORFNA LA TERRACE DR N w ? V //(?J GRANGER DR ? ? 0 A 8 C R 523 . . g DREW Sf < a < a w 'a 6 § q V Q O O Q g U 6 m ;- 'ridge C'. fl N/SH PROJECT ST Q= L- I VMRMAN Sr S a a SIT Q E i 0 < WHITMAN Si Q. R BO CHAUCER ST p Q 8 Y CHAD g SIELLEY S< ]??LL SHE Y ST . 0 GULF TO RAY BLVD S.R 80 } ar N II?''Im(?'NYe?e?III III''''II ? 9 O O a ? UU o 3 DmnD RD ,14FFA PL a o w COLLEGE pR O BASCOM WAY O 0 SEVILE BLVD ' gD W? 5 lAIAIER,SITYOR 3 GROVEWOOD ? RD $ ? RD F?/Wg, MNNEOLA RD o'f ?J PEARCE DR DR GLENMOOR RD BURNILE OR [ ?.Y P BELLCHIER DR 2 a aFnNOOR? aaaaaa GIENMOOR RD S QIIII?IOOR N 1R?PIC HKLS -ES DRIVE $ s ?? O i o a DORADO PL LAKEMEW RD -- a BRIE MWOOO LL DR HABERSHNA Location Map Owner: ( Rophie Family Partnership Case: FLD2005-07075 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property Size(Acres): 0.964 DC Customs PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Atlas Page: 290B ?.\ lul II III ly L.c,Nu, II I ICI II \%- u o vIdns unu snenswup requesr r0rmszuu'1\rLu Map request form.doc • 1 115 r 1118 ?' N EF WHITMAN ST J o -'goo _rAl f- - kk I t I l Il G/ L_-- I-IL ` 1 rJ L_J L,_ I I - ?-its 21B -1 11 r J ;208 W 2 1 1-112 i t __I L J 1 I- Q _' r-ZL 21 I 1 _a I J Q L' r' ° r l ml N I L 1-L__ _r 1 _ ' 1216 Q, 211 I -- ;i 1, r 1 j 2fr I F, t-1?1 CHAUCER ST L-- W W - C, ' _l - S l3 3f-11 I, i in d c, _ _ r. I ? - ? I I N o v I sv5 I I I ?$ t _ L N?r L I I N I I J ' - I LI I I I r1 I L__N I L? I L I -- L-- J L i L---I I I 0 I I 311 I 1' T L__Z I 76 ? L.-- ' S ingle Family Residential H 3g7 I ° N --er' N ?} r _ L_ -J - W 1 J `?N 3101 1 3r1 -1 310 U 1 ---- . ?"'--- ; SHELLEY ST L--- ' ,J Vehicle Service Retail & N I accessory I-- I I I Vehicle I----I L -- ? Service 1 {1 2 I----- - y I ; I._ ,---- Retail 1 L--------= I I I ' 1 `--- ra La_ N Q - - °N N N N N N -0--- 416 M u?i I---- o N N R ^ N N G - -BAY BLVD GULF-TO-BAY BLVD - ; ; Mobile Home Park N Mobile Home Park r_ N I r- L--J ? t; _ W L_ I I i ' i , _j y' L-r-- '', W -? L? J ^ Office _ fr7 r? rJ O 5TH ST ?_? ver night Accomodation ,1 l-rL-J „ _ _? JI 1 ru /!7 l l I ' ' I ? I I ? n ?r - s F ,r -? / -- , r 1 r I I L_ J, L _, I -_j _ ___ Existing Use Map Owner: Rophie Family Partnership Case: FLD2005-07075 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property 0 964 Size(Acres) : . DC Custom s PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Atlas Page: 290B x \r-mmurlg ueparrmenr\C D 8\rorms and snells\Map request forms2003VLD Map request form.doc Residential Property to the north. r 0 Ur w4l ;MID 1- ?I Subject property - 2430 Gulf to Bay from the corner of Kilmer Ave and Shelley Street. This is the view of the building from the residential properties to the north. 0 Vehicle Service to the west. This is the view from the residential properties to the north. 0 0 0 r i Subject property -vehicle sales located on the southern portion of the site. Note: lack of landscaping and non- conforming setbacks to pavement. CJ WIMM 4A 0 Y4r rr Subject property -Vehicle sales located on the southern portion of the subject site. Applicant has requested a waiver from redeveloping this portion of the site due to lease conflicts. r^ Residential Property to the north east of the subject property. Retail sales with accessory vehicle service to the east of the subject property. 0 0 Subject property -view of the north west elevations. This is the view from the residential properties to the north. 0 0 West side of Vehicle service building to the west of subject property. ??-?e 58 RyA T? f u l '` `s ... t - . .. ?. V' f . Residential property to the north. 0 0 Office building to the south, across Gulf to Bay Blvd. Mobile Home Park to the south east of the subject property -across Gulf to Bay Blvd. 0 0 Overnight Accomodations to the south west of the subject property -across Gulf to Bay Blvd. S= 4 drr':an ).i gill 0 ?IHSUR? pow v'. .. ilA R Lek J40 Retail Sales & an Adult use located to the west of the subject property. r 6 i r I j 1f6 115 r- TM8 NJ N L- -11 WHITMAN ST m I -J 2 j? ?? 11 rJ 1 I 2pn I --J ?? I I j 7 r-rte -. r d' 1-? v '-N r 1 21.? Li T F, 204 L1 1 5 I - 1206 1 I, N' I 11, ICI II I II NII , L--- L_ L? 1 I I=I L-r -L_r 1 1 rJ L_J I I 1- X216 2f9 -I F-1 1208 ; Z W_I -- L --?12 I __I r_, L_J Q _J 1 L?21 Z -I 1 I Q -f--1216 1 r-1 I LJ f-' or 1 rol N I _i t 1-L r l - --^? ?- I i__ al L vl in I _ I' Q I 211 L _ r-- I I I I 3(!x-1 y, ?+ r1?21 ; 2{ III ?1, ' r CHAUCER ST L W I I L , Y -- I 1, I I I -1 j l e v v L o 1 1 v =e, 1'-?, - 1 l N t"L NIN I NI I I N 1 N 1 NII I I I L 1 L 1 1 r I I I I I -L r 1 I L I t_-? 1- LJ I IJ 1 i I i 1_ i I.T 6 i_I _ 1 -_41 3111 1 ?_I 4 I , 7 L__ I L--? L_J _ I?+l ?2T---1 I I- -? a I _I ' 01 I r ' L? 1 ' 1 rJ c ? I I I?l I ? ? ml I ?I it ?? I- ? 1 M ?I 1 L I I L _-? 1 N N I-I 310 L_-. 0 J L_ 1_= -Lsn L_J " ?N N -cyi ? ?aJ N N -1 310 _ --- i I 401---? I ' I Q I I v v ' 2 I I ,---J 1 I I I __J I --? I I I L I I ____I I 1 F_ 1 W 1 I I i_ 1 - 1 I 1 rJ I -- 3'?'- I I -??,_? L? I ?_; L I I 1 , 1 2 1 I 1 1 L----- I I I I r 1 1 1 I 1 ---I rn - rn - -c$- rc3 416 ---- ( ? N? N N N N N N N ? 7 N N GULF-TO-BAY BL c GULF-TO-BAY B VD - BAY i r-- J L 1 = _ I I I 1 1 I I ? J N I I ' r-- L L__L L, r--- - 1_- 1' I I _ r ?? L-- I I I^ I _ L? 1 1 Q I 1 1 1 I _ _ t; J _I -_I i I S IJ _ 1-I L_r__J 1-L r - 111 i !? L_? rr J _ _ f ] Z L 508: -- - + ? J 5TH ST ry r I i I i - L I__? I I i -- -I 1--?1 I 1- N Z rl p ' 1 I L_ ? r L- J ?Ir-? r-? I F, J ?! ; _ ,I I_ - J--I r W 513 i _3 r l 1 1 I I ?_ i L-L I I + N L__r IT V rrl,, - J I _ L - 1 I---r LJ rn 1' 1 __I ? ' I?f I 1 , I---I r _ _ 1 ?_1 Zoning Map Owner: Rophie Family Partnership ( Case: FLD2005-07075 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property 0.964 Size(Acres): DC Custom s PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Atlas Page: 290B .3: wianning ueparrmenr\L u b\rorms and snells\Map request forms2003\FLD Map request form.doc 40 0 I I I=1 If \'.- U O vurrrrs unu snens\map requesr IormsZUU3\rLu wrap request torm.doc 0 0 Rr? W O D ? ut C P ? 2 MPRILVN ST S11lf Y RD SIL4R EY RD ?1 O ? U AHNA AVE " // (Y///__V/(j/ a LORBJH U TERRACE DR -N-? J 0 R S ?' R ??e- b GRANGER p y ? DORA' rypRM/Y1 C R 528 CR j I . . K O 'a ww DREW Sr a Q q Q w a _ ? U Q O U i a m 25 y C-bnEg. Cr.. 9; TW000 DR wi I U NASRH PROJECT + P P z vumnLARr sr I a ? a ? WHITMAN ST SIT c E u E CHAUCER ST Q CHAU $ SHELLEV ? ? ? o??LL SHE Sr 61 SR. 80 3 -. GULF TO BAY BLVp SR 80 I? a ° >a o 3 o CAAPUS > AGDEMY DRUID RD AAFFA PL Y? O BASCOM WAY o ?Q4 SEVILLE BLVD w COLIEGE DR g8 ?? 5 WIVF37,gH}Y?' OR 3 ?? ?g RD G rc ? MNNEOLA !A ? ? FARCE DR DR U B l{WIOE DR ??? GLEMAOOR RD QEHMOOR? V a t a a a a Q a ¢ O? v BELLCNffR DR > QTC QfN`IOOR RD S GLEtAIOOR D M 'IR?AC RdL3 OR Prb?ry U SR. CHARLES DRIVE 5 ?yz g a ^-^ a DDRAH PL BRf D 9 IA10 VIEW R? `fp NIWDOD DR WBERSINM 6 ?L V Location Map Owner: Rophie Family Partnership Case: FLD2005-07075 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property Size (Acres) : 0.964 DC Customs PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Atlas Page: 290B x wur ring ueparrmenr\c: U dvorms and shells\Map request f0rms2003\FLD Map request form.doc 1 1116 115 `?' --- WHITMAN ST Fff- , I z?11-I r_?o _ v ?o /,? l? -r zpq L" L J t I N 11 !206 - , ,__r1 _ 1 I L- 2f 219 -1 2b4- 1 X208 !U. --?I12 W I -I --I r-Z _J L 21 I I 'r" i., I Q Li ,-' o, r mI N I 1 ; r Iz16 Q. 211 L_- -4 I L_ _ -- `-- I 1 I I I _ J ' --Fit W 21'; r L, '-! W i 1' 7-121 Z CHAUCER ST 1 i Q i 31 I_ I I 3191 N o o '1 f_- p I I v I -vim I ?$, - I? II I I Nkv I 1 N , N N L f _1 J L , 1 1_ , ? _ ? , I I III i- I J ' i_-N 1 1 rl I j I- I I I 0, ' 3111 I 1 j j '76 3 L--- L-- Single Family Residential 2 err-- 1 i , , f, 1 L I N ' `- ? ' I 5 W L_ `wJ =- _= - 'f 310 3 -, 310 U `---- ' 01 X--- ; SHELLEY ST L--- ' Vehicle Service tail & N ' I I I z-? essory --; _- I l-- I I I I 1 I _ 1 ? -_-? r___-, Vehic I le 1 I , 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I ,_ J 1 _ -- ? I I 1 I 24 i----- _j ? Service I I LI 1 1 - L_ . -- Retail I --- m rncn.- N a - -c°Vi3 N N N N N 416 t•L?J ai I---- o 0 N N N N G - -BAY BLVD GULF-TO-BAY BLVD ; I Mobile Home Park N Mobile Home Park r_ N 1 f r-' , Q J r--^ J L-- W I I--% N i I i _r--t L-a' = ' y 1- _ ? ti ' L-r-- Ljr -_ r ?. I W Office 5TH ST r'^?, `? - ; - ' - ?; Over J night Accomodation P, , I 1 - _ S I -J J--1 --- L , , r-, 1 lt?l n F I i I , 't ^I i y - I I ! ' V L- W _ -rye ?!!7?lu `- GI L_ _j fr- I I 1--I-? I -3 , I L hI H j i _J I -1 --l Existing Use Map Owner:. Rophie Family Partnership Case: FLD2005-07075 Site: 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd Property 0 964 Size(Acres): . DC Customs PIN: 18-29-16-00000-130-0400 Atlas Page: 290B .): wlannng Deparrmenr\'r u d\rorms and shells\Map request forms2003\FLD Map request form.doc 0 0 FLD2005-07075 2430 Gulf to Bay Boulevard 9/27/2005 Residential Property to the north east of the subject propero . Retail sales -tN ith accesson vehicle sen ice to the east of the subject property. Residential PropertN to the north. 0 0 BOOM- Subject propertc - 24' 0 Gulf to Bay from the corner of Kilmer Ave and Shelley Street. This is the view of the building from the residential properties to the north. "low Subject propem - Vehicle sales located on the southern portion of the subject site. Applicant has requested a -,vainer from redeN eloping this portion of the site due to lease conflicts. Subject property - vehicle sales located on the southern portion of the site. Note: lack of landscaping and non- conforinung setbacks to pavement. Subject property - view of the north west elevations. This is the N ie-*,% from the residential properties to the north. 2 r • Vehicle Service to the i est. This is the ieN\ from (lie residential properties to the north. F. "Oe F°?" rMs Residential property to the north. West side of Vehicle sen ice building to the A vest of subject propertm. Office building to the south, across Gulf to Bav Blvd. 3 0 0 Mobile Home Park to the south east of the subject property- - across Gulf to BaN Blvd. Retail Sales & an Adult use located to the A vest of the subject property. Overniglit Acconuodations to the south vest of the subject property - across Gulf to Bav Bled. 4 IuL 21 2M I D I 0 PLANNING Ut±i?'iC?t?1.dE i?1i'$1ICS? Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc. - - QTY W +?t.?,kt?Y 9 _........_? PROJECT NARRATIVE ORIGINV, The proposed project amounts to re-establishment of a historical use (Vehicle Service) on the subject property located at 2430 Gulf-To-Bay Boulevard (SR 60), Clearwater, Florida. Planning Staff has indicated that this project will only be considered by application under the Comprehensive Infill category since the Vehicle Service Use is not allowed in the Corrunercial (C) Zoning District. Hence, Comprehensive Infill will allow the subject use via the 1RT Zoning District Criteria. The property is presently occupied by a 9,000 SF concrete block building with adjacent parking and similar neighboring uses. The building was originally constructed by American Motros Corporation and utilized for Vehicle Service and Repair activities. The building was later used by Lokey Motor Company as a Body Shop and Auto Repair facility. The present owner is the Rophie Family Partnership, c/o ALBA Consulting Corporation (ALBA). ALBA is assisting the owners as the Agent to process a Flexible Development Application for this Comprehensive Infill Project, to gain approval from the City of Clearwater to lease the 9,000 SF building to a prospective tenant, DC Customs. DC Customs is a Vehicle Service Use which operates a business that provides for customizing automobiles. The subject services include installation of custom wheels, rims, window tinting, stereo equipment, and detailed body work DC Customs is expected to be a lower intensity use than the historical uses in the building. In addition, the adjacent uses to the south, east and west are Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Advance Auto Parts (Repair) and "A to Z" Auto Care, respectively. Both Advance Auto Parts (Repair) and "A to Z" Auto Care operate (6) service bays. Each of these businesses performs all types of vehicle repairs, with activities being performed at the bay openings or outside. DC Customs proposes activities in a completely enclosed garage area away from view to adjacent properties. The vehicles to be serviced will be secured in a fenced compound temporarily awaiting transfer to garage area. The services employ trained technicians, utilize high-end equipment & parts and require an interior environment to assure quality installation. No outside activities are proposed. As part of this application, the owners have proposed to improve driveway access to the property and parking which will prevent congestion on the roadway and will improve internal circulation. The driveway & parking improvements will cause "A to Z" Auto Care to remove approximately (15) junk vehicles from the subject property. In coordination, the parking area proposed will be fenced and landscaping will be provided to buffer the property from the single family residential properties on the north side of Shelley Street. In addition, the owner is proposing a stormwate, quality treatment swale to capture the first one-half inch of runoff from the repavec parking area. 1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com ? S AIGINAL The owner is also proposing a 5' sidewalk along Kilmer Avenue. The existing building will be pressure washed and cleaned by the owner. As part of this application, the owner is requesting approval of the following conditions: 1. The property will be approved for Vehicle Service Use in the C Zoning District based on site planned deviations from the Commercial General Standards (Code Section 2-701 and 2-702) for FAR, ISR, Lot Area, Lot Width, Maximum Height, Setbacks and Buffers. Only parking shall be compared to and deviate from that allowed in the IRT Zoning District (Code Section 2-1302) with a standard parking ratio of 1.5 spaces per 1,000 SF of building area. 2. Improvements to the subject property, as requested by the City Staff in conjunction with this application, shall be limited to the portion of the Lot occupied by the 9,000 SF building and NOT the Enterprise Rent-A-Car site. 3. The rear buffer along Shelley Street, abutting the parking, will be allowed to be no less than 9.94' in width except as already exists abutting the dumpster enclosure. 4. The rear buffer along Shelley Street, abutting the parking, will be allowed to be utilized for the proposed 4:1 stormwater treatment swale. 5. (1) 30 SF Tenant Wall Signs will be allowed on each of the south & east building faces, equating to (2) signs total. 6. A 6-foot tall opaque fence can be installed surrounding the proposed parking. 11 If !J r s'. lk 4T/ 0 ORIGINAL. LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EASTERN 150 FEET (CONTAINING 41,997 SF MOL) OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS PER O.R. 8632, PG. 326: FROM THE SW CORNER OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, RUN S 89°40'55" E ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 18, 324.57 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE FOR KILMER AVE, THENCE N 1°01'28" E, ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF KILMER AVENUE, 330.03 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF GULF TO BAY ACRES FIRST ADDITION AS RECORDED IN THE PLAT BOOK 52, PAGE 55 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N 89°41'18" W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GULF TO BAY ACRES FIRST ADDITION, 324.50 FEET, THENCE S 1-02'13" W, 330.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING LESS THE SOUTH 50.00 FEET AND THE EAST 30.00 FEET FOR THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. 4 JUL 2 7 ;. _., .. CM AF L... . Pinellas County Property Appra??P formation: 18 29 16 00000 130 09? ORIGI? ?7a L 18 20 / 10 1 00000 I 130 0400 17-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:14:46 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales ROPHIE, ALAN OBIS: 08632 OPG: 0326 ROPHIE, RALPH BETECH, CECILA COHEN, CHERYL C/O ALBA CONSULTING CORP 1420 COURT ST EVACUATION ZONE: NONE CLEARWATER FL 33756-6147 Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 267.03 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 O/ 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( ) 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 621,500 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 621,500 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 621,500 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 14,275.48 1) 150 x 280 12.00 42, 000.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 14, 275.48 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 14,275.48 Short Legal E 150FT OF W 494.57FT OF N 28OFT OF S 330FT OF Description OF NE 1/4 Enm-i Building Information JUL 21 2M, { ?' http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &p=18+29+16+00000+130+0910262%2... 5/17/2005 Pinellas County Property Appra *formation: 18 29 16 00000 130 09? Page 4 of 7 18 29 / 10 I 00000 130 0400 :02 17-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:14:47 Commercial Card 02 of 3 Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 410 KILMER AUE Prop Use: 339 Land'Use:-27'" S ruc ural Elemsn-ts ORIGINAL Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 18 Party Wall 30% Common Wall Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Unfinished Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 4 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,959 Effective Age 35 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3 as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 6,000 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) 00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Cornrri?rcial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) . 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #3 !.,; 2:7 20M l PLANNING & DFV,-: yr ;,, t4l 3VCS1 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?plus=l &p=18+29+16+00000+130+0910262%2... 5/17/2005 Pinellas County Property Apprwformation: 18 29 16 00000 130 0 Page 5 of 7 18 1 29 / 10 00000 1 130 / 0400 :03 17-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:14:37 Commercial Card 03 of 3 Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 410 KILMER AVE Prop Use: 339 Land"Use: 27-' S?ruc tural E1OmenTs ORIGINAL Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall 30% Common Wall Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Unfinished Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 0 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,966 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Ar4Bas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 3,000 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) 00 0 9) , 00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Fsa?ures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) . 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map 114w] FE w JUL 27 2005 PLANNING & O;* T t t;x `d"T S' CITY OF http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlegi-click?plus=l &p=18+29+16+00000+130+0910262%2... 5/17/2005 Pinellas County Property Apprnformation: 18 29 16 00000 130 0 Page 6 of 7 ORIGINAL SIRED NASH STREET w > j W L W W Z iI 7 STREET L WHITMAN STREET S-T RED - -- CHAUCER STREET Z - ;- } W 4 3 Z W GULF 10 10 S1REE7 BAY 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) JUL 27 2005 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &p=18+29+16+00000+130+0910262%2... 5/17/2005 ;UL 2 2 I PLANNING & OEV, o,.-? 1"; r .; ; SvC"t CITY M c:.:.. ?.Ka ...r http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &p=18+29+16+00000+130+0910262%2... 5/17/2005 . of 7 4R' % ? r - a •- m" ?. ,. .. - r, v in ,. ?? ! * ? ? fig `. bt ,. A Al", i a i ;a ORIGINAL SITE STORMWATER 0• SHELLY ST So' ,oo' a TREATMENT 6' VERTICAL SWALE , CURBING 15' 2' 13' ' a' s SCALE: 1" = 50' q Ala PARKING 4 jj _ I 4 _-- ?L GRASS R/W STRIP SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NHEEL??....-. 1 .. ..__...__._____.__.__..._....._....._...__ -lL V 7iLlL lllLlL lllllG_?I _ _ _ _ _ _ T STOP AFFRONMAn: 8/Y uR6 1• DEEP WATER DUALITY - I SHELLY ST TREATMENT SWALE FOR PROPOSED 9 N 1 f:. -' I EW PARKING AREA ONLY. PEDESTRIA SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 RAMP k - a ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER (60 R/W) LANDING PER CITY STANDARDS U: , !' TALL 'TINGE 2y 9tlIT TPo 114F __ S --' P d N LANDE ?1 e' w1ncAL N89'42'21'W 294.50' a4` SCAP a o c ama (rro) p' - I APPROXIM /- - - - - - - - - d (NTS) - ? A SECTION A-A A TO Z j 7 ..-N! Ln ap I a PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE l j AUTO ' 8 SIDEWALK ANOP CARE EXISTING I/ _ 5' : IW DE RE HYD ? a CL R ?:./ o; I I 14.94' „ SIDEWO8 R / I AUTO a Q O „ .94' I( ? .? :Aallfr ; C l / ? I i sralACE ? I 6cROS WALK s SITE LEGEND BUILDING USE DATA o y f .. _ 1" V PARTS 3 p ?/ - t.- GARAGE FOR VEHICLE a1 1 GAIN PEINTRY N 6 ° G 0 SERVICE k PARKING 6 _ Z ?G HANDICAP PARKING l? BUR DING COMPONENT AREA (31 ??-f '2430 1U• -- TENPN? SESIGNOON WALL Cl Ss STORAGE / PARTS 688 SF PRODUCT .I PROPOSED PROPOSED CURB DRAINAGE INLET OFFICE / WAITING 418 SF D ® m z ?. .... ..... ...... 1J..i......_ISPLAY O 1 e 5 1 ? I LLL SITE BOUNDARY LINE ?...-..._ DISPLAY 740 SF m g 4. 'OFFICE / N1' 1504' Q" :I CENTER LINE OF ROAD --- PAINT BOOTH 2.576 SF n I D cl PAINT BOOTH 'WAITING ?I PoGHT-OF-WAY ................... VEHICLE SERVICE AREA 4.580 SF W -S, o• -? 100' K cf:o EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ----_- TOTAL - 9,000 SF .... ..._ ___., aA1' I Jiff PROPOSED CONCRETE ...._.._ . r.. '... xr r YI' ~ d 52428 _ II p W E:Y. ; i5P:NG .U10' Gi m TYPICAL TYP W .yg HC ' RE AIL SHOPS BUSN-13 HANDICAP * PROPOSE II r / PARKING SPACES p SIGN LEGEND (F•<ISi':14 RE:TAIU 'STR:° TENTER); ; `-. - -SIG" N N 1 I ?m LL WALL yy SIDEWALK S/W NO lE%T OR SYMBOL SIZE ( I 1 `•?? . - 1 PRQPOSEIti sraP Jo•N3o• `-< ENTERPRISE i o c CRETE 5' RADIUS R5' R1-I I p2a'E `4' ''O #-22' A #2,42,6 - 1n C7 R3-1 NO RIGHT TURN 24'.24' H? RANT A CAR - Pi LINEAR FEET R3-7 LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT 30•K30 " RS-1 DO NOT ENTER JO">t30' I ?o I e EXIST NC A„TC SW ARE FEET SF R6-I ONE WAY 36"312" ?. ... ... . ... _. ' ni:'v'AL ^AR?. R3-SR RIGHT TURN ONLY 24"324 I J, T T' y'I ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL ON I ,::r I: i < UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. In 102 co GENERAL NOTES SIGN `I I !i I ? 1. ALL CURB RADII TO BE 3' UNLESS OTHERVASE L LOT LINE 44.57 ' LOT LINE 100' NOTED. 1? '?. ? :la OF .... .._..., S89'40'31•E 294.58' 1' I R 2. ALL CURB TO BE 6" VERTICAL CURBING. --- ( P OPOSED?` lx DRIVEWAY --? DRIVEWAY J?-+? DRIVEWAY ..??' 1 / PEDESTRIAa''„I a ........... ... 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED FROM FACE OF_._._......_._..-.-_-.-_-.._._.._..-_-.::_-::.-_-::. _:':::_::::::-.::r.::r..:r.:r1.::::::r..1-.::r.::r_:: _' --RAMP CURB. ?< V EXISTING FIREnHYDRANT ?PEDESTRIAN C EXISNG RAMP STRIPING NOTES GULF TO BAY (SR 601 TYPICAL PARKING SPACE SHALL BE STRIPED (100' R/W) GRATE IEXISTING F- WITH A 4' WHITE STRIPE. D v II....`.'9 IJ ILL 777 INLET U F 2. SEE DETAILS FOR HANDICAP PARKING. ,?j IA a w? a 1= ti [= JUL 2 7 b0 SHEET No. p Ni" ;) EVELOPMENT UCS Ct1iy GENERALL ND5 T _ uwn0...w V. 1' DEEP WATER OUAUTY A CAPE NO E5 SHELLY ST TREATMENT SWALE FOR NEW PARKING AREA ONLY. >^?m<w<<wro>ao. SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 L.. u e ,<r » 7 8 ,; ? N89'42'21'W 294.50' <?•<e?„"w„Pwe<ew.s.>w^??.<m,,,w.~ww:<eo:?„<. ° ;?.r? A TO Zt j A "° 13 q mb rc<. x< wd Ma TO .". oa N AU a CARE N l FERTILIZATION , ' 'Wi g r,- O l I s ngrtPr >r"y emn>xe.>dv?*+=?e p.u.w ror?e ? ?+w<:m wx.ey nx se<:.«. v wo? ? rel ; ..,r 17711 I I ' » ? e<we<.. ?<.a<w. A :ou = I ! ? jp s C 7 ? .q'-?40 ? !I i I r . ? I 3a - z ' n II I? G.a.?erav ax g«<r<'ve.e<r<a:m,...a"l+v.d> l I I ... I Z m y? _ I Pi _ ... ... ....... ' I d 9 ___- o : y%42n W 117 : to I _. _y t E;!15T:N4 At: rr o J w. - N i e: L u siNr;; RETAIL $HOP$ ? w ,y rue plwrl oeraL / 1 rxorernoN GeraL ru n v 3 i I II ; V ! \ ? ? L .xsiN. TA.li srR" ?N'; ' cs ENTERPRISE p24:.F f y242., I P <- I g CL - W? ??? o A N U U ? ANT A CAR R O_ P I I I i ? ?O ? I I I SHRUB PIANiWG OeiNL `_ .. ..... _......... N:A. . h1K:N.> J F:F .. . _ .......... .... ....... f II 7 Plant Mates ?ial 5cheJule a h I'; c I II 3 I: N N I.' } '?: PL-.iTGR \ • l? u> cm= .?:: c"mm",: w -11y x^ 39p« Ispacing 6 nIB m= .. Z4'. 29• 3oG'o.c. N?xa>p rotucw m.a?: e?namndlr 3 ] M ^ zao IS rel^.u^arc t i1, Irma lz>p.. lro.o. • • 3 •o.=. c vVi Q 5 c w > - a LOT LINE 44.57 LOT LINE ILO , ! ,?1 ? ...?AT.lIL?f..li`?...?..._...? 589'40'31"E 294 58' <r e o B It a=•=v°=m°?mea a<ap=Mrw= z.s•Il. 71. Iz a aw,?>v^ tw G uw . 2• nr. 30 ""^>u^ w,. ? at . ..J ?. i ? zzpaw a>p< 3a" 39 G taJphckpf rdu awtbwn 3qa ?28'M. Bap 3P O.c. W rl:e ospamum tasm^ro?eka Va•?COnteder lasmirc 3gal l0' 3a o.c. : GULF TO BAY (SR 60) ., ;?ww p? awtr m o a,, ?t? ?,a w l g 1, 6 h[°: z;p ° B "_ 20 ] UA Ulmua Lata Cm 12' M1. 8 zru 2amu twMxm Lreboare va ] gal.. 3a < 3a 36' o.c. AND .E A R C III I T E C T S (100' R/W) aee w.r l.;,. 0 25' ?.as? rraw? O Scale 1" = 50'-0" V/ I E 1 01 V JU! 2,1r G11V C1 _ . ..._ , .. 6 ?m .. ?,-?._ .? y,.^ ^7?i- :oaac - 1 r?woo u+ylY was _ - ROIT - V ......?. xum ,?urnsa ...?ooa fir r?o-r 1 .A?6P avul'o ! t . ., ,. - d $ `a _ _ ;: 3D V woi. wa u 8 .5 W Tal,wlT ERtt 51011 ,? +. t r , UU z _ g 3 mFA?'Lr BUtFa c F i CO) i SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION WEST BUILDING ELEVATION < B OOS1Fq AWfIQ[IUIM. R?i`Ji¢ Ai ROQ UK W ' Aty w ?.. ?, ,. _,_„ - JO SF IDWT WAIL 90 (SOUTH FACE OF BUNO) _ 0 g - EN1EE AND FIIESLU FALL! YGB4D OFB??I?EDDDLBB???.---??? ,o,ANr \\\ -- wAl1 sw AND nLANED BY OMNFR \ Y a m B EN'RRE FAIL [R B D? TO BE TO PRESSURE WASHED AND CLEANED BY Y _., .. . BOOM ENT DOOR -_ w LL. J ac O I ? \ \ ? Oar ?r o d a , , ? ... .., PNOTALD [NIRY DOUI-?'' j ? PAfaMO f]OT COYt ?` i ° - 2 ?- / [NilfI 00011. ?PROPOSM ER AVE A OE UNDER AMINO ' KILI to i r F REMOVED VER FOR TD E- MIiN r MAU( REW FOR PROPOSED ' w y F 1 7 lA1OECJAlO M ARE ^ C, UG W w MOFO1lD RP14 OoOR? ? rTH r MAU( i / ?Sk , ? c= ?' ? b W„ *? ? r ?*9 a r'! s+'t ,t` a ' ' a1^ .Alo ME ? DETERIORATED PAVEMENT TO ?, SHELLEY STREET BE MOM AND OVERLATED OLARPARI?B AREA TD X M.M-' A!O tAlO]CIpID UPON IOCY 1" A pf OUMNICY LY 11101E INKY NE]i0E1fM1 INMRL 1?T ? ~f •• F ? .. r+?:v ? ,.? `^'.?MLw' . ". r J f ,;?, N + A( J. ?. A k` X' n i .r k; W O J -? F nH NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION I EAST BUILDING ELEVATION SHEE T No. cn?? t o ' 70 C T -s yF `°? WEST BUILDING ELEVATION NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION 30 SF TENANT WALL SIGN (SOUTH FACE OF BLDG) 30 SF ENTIRE FACE OF BUILDING TENANT TO BE PRESSURE WASHED WALL SIGN AND CLEANED BY OWNER TENAN _.-?__.?._?...._. VEHICLE PAINT - - •__.T_. BOOTH EXIT DOOR - - TENANT 1 MR N VEHICLE SERVICE Q PROPOSED ENTRY DOORS PARKING EXIT DOOR \-PROPOSED ENTRY DOOR C KILMER AVE TO BE UNDER AWNING' PAVEMENT AREA TO BE WITH 9 WALK REMOVED FOR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING IN THIS ARE f}at n sd a `t ,3 ? ?1 ?n s(Y H •r t.., ..t H ?r „ 1 ! '>`t'7 11x` .? % b w; 1?}a {.C.r. ,? v r,; ?, r a2. va4".._,v .?? .? > . trRRk .s a zr r u .3.'? }?t z z . j S"f ? ?ii rt f s' < ar' ?? ? 3 ? ~7'? ! . P?b.?? s j. 1i .-.,3 . ,. r I.. ; ?'? a?':?; f i"e' ..r•" 7^ a i? ... r t ».,.it '??" ?, -%? a{, _ ,1C. r'b.? s.? A Cdr .L-ti l?,?u s . 'S }? »' 1 ? EAST BUILDING ELEVATION ORIGINAL 0 .. . , 0 The proposal is for a car customizing business to be located at 2430 Gulf to Bay blvd., where customers bring their automobiles for personalized services such as: painting, custom bodywork, interior work, audio and video systems, and installation of wheels. Staff's concern relative to the vehicle service major use is its proximity to the single-family residential dwellings located across Shelley Street to the north. Based on the proposal that has been submitted, Staff's concern is that the vehicle service major use is too intense for an area that has two existing vehicle service businesses in the immediate vicinity and in addition the close proximity to the single-family residential development to the north. The property is leased in two parts: A northern part where the applicant's vehicle service business is proposed; and A southern part where Enterprise Rent A Car currently operates. The applicant is also requesting a waiver to the parking and landscaping (through the utilization of the comp landscape program) requirements to bring the Enterprise Rent A Car (southern) portion of the property into compliance as required for establishing a new use on the site, as a whole. Which includes • A reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), and the landscape buffer • A reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), and the landscape buffer Staff's concern relative to the parking and landscaping waiver is that the Community Development Code requires when a new use or a change of use occurs that certain aspects of site redevelopment occur. These aspects specifically are parking, landscaping, and signage. While staff realizes that even the proposed partial redevelopment of this site is an improvement to the site, the failure to bring the remainder of site (the frontage along the scenic corridor, Gulf to Bay Boulevard) is not in compliance with the Code. I would also like to Note that at meeting, prior to the applicant making their application, staff advised the applicants of the concerns of a major vehicle service use at this location and that applying for this application would require that the entire site be brought into compliance with current code requirements. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area). The applicants parking analysis indicates that the proposed parking for the northern portion of the property provides only two standard and one handicapped parking spaces for customers. Staff does not support this portion of the proposal because the number of parking spaces for customers appears to be inadequate. A positive aspect of the proposal includes a request to permit a six-foot tall site obscuring fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly Street and east along Kilmer Avenue) that will buffer f the parking area to the residential neighbors to the north, in a more appealing manner than existing conditions. Additional positive aspects of the proposal include the construction of a sidewalk within the rights-of- way of Kilmer Avenue for pedestrian safety, where no sidewalk presently exists. Site drainage proposed within a ten-foot wide landscape buffer along the north side of the property along the Shelley Street property line. A fifteen-foot landscape buffer is to, be provided along the northern portion of Kilmer Avenue. This enhancement will not only provide a storm water treatment area, but the additional landscaping will assist in buffering the fence and parking area to the residential neighbors to the north, in a more appealing manner than existing conditions. Staff's opposition for this project is based on the reasons enumerated above, including, but not limited to the failure to incorporate improvements to the entire site and the intensification of the incompatible uses to the residential properties in the immediate vicinity. 0 IELLY ST I TlTfT.? - - (PER CITY - = - = - - - = = = -`-\ N89'42'21 "W 294.50' FENCE 4 TO Z I W/ GATE AUTO N CARE 'EYI:11N; ti QQ cn ONj T'O .`G` 1 HEFC m U cy ry u 0 FAQ,: '." w I 0' 50' 100' SCALE: 1 50' SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL APPROXIMATE R/W LINE 1' DEEP WATER QUALITY SHELLY ST TREATMENT AE FOR NEW PARKING AREA ONLY. (60' R/W) SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 A 6' TALL FENCE 20' SIGHT TRIANGLE /- - - a- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - m r LANDSCAPE °n 6" VERTICAL RIIFFFR CURB (TYP)7 20? e A 0 0 \ • }\ ( p? I \J SIDEWALK , " ?- 12.73 CANOPY '. ' 23:' 23 I `II 4 ? -'?iO . 24.95' iA Z ? , 2 a 0 m I STORAGE/ i PARTS O - k t!2 GARAGE FOR VEHICLE Z'T C ' SERVICE & PARKING -? •24.31 j- XISTII . ? II DRrv E 10' r---------- O PRODUCT NT ?I f d AISLE • ? I DISPLAY 0 r 'W= _ ?1J ?._ ._ _ _ ? ._ _... __ .... __ ;rte OFFICE / f0• , !WAITING PAINT BOOTH of PEDESTRIAN RAMP & LANDING ?I I I I I "I? r I \ ^I ..! EXISTING " II , FIRE 1 1-iYDRAMT 5 It D El CONCRET'E' SIDEWA).(^ -- I I r * 'I II I I 6" STRIPED GROSS'1 WALK ?( jCANQPjY I ?MAI NTRY I wll I I Q` i 100' I Z gi'?rr` I J: 1 wg ----'t_. - -- _l O - - ------.._.. 30.2' I' ' a 3 o 04 ?I I ?I Y W Cs 'Z' ?. ; EXISTING AlITv 00 I Q PROPOSE I " ca 4 L SHOPS _ <ENTA BUSINESS `' >^ 30 SF W ' i I J ,1 - Ji TENANT I I i s j Z y a T :IU S-PIP ENTEtij SIGN ON I !`I I I j Q 1- m w ow -,` WALL N I I GC v fi =a ENTERPRISE l °a wz o " I ?o 42422 X2424 #2420 v1 co o > RENT-A-CAR ` Z ' I I o- o- ' I PROPOS :. --?--- ........... --.._ ... ---....i aN 5' WIDE 2o.s0a' EXS i ?'C AIT: N R= -A:._ k....IIJti SIDEWALK N m m i o w a 1 - IZ a I I ?I -j I I ?3 I SIGN IN PANTER 1j w LOT LINE 100' LOT LINE 150'•• I j a t' ` x 589'40'31 "E 294.58' PROPOSED ._ r ? ?I DRIVEWAY r- -+ -, DRIVEWAY - PEDESTRIA 0 --- --- ------- - - -- - -- -- -- - - ---------- - RAMP -_-_ 137.84' 40' 68.12' (L ISTINC-- EXISTING ................_......., ..._...... ..... ......... .......... . ........ ._............ -- - FIRE HYDRANT PEDESTRIAN ........... ..._G..ULF_...._T.O ._S_AY (S-R _60.) -- - -- - RAMP _ (100' R/W) EXISTING ___GRATE__ INLET J C p O O ' II N a s z 0 0 _ v a o ? a a U vai y s o? - x A m suorsrna? (¢j q µ7 z o V Z f- J N Z O a m J a m O I LL J D O M ti cm a V Lu W 20 0 V D H U ti W O? a H a o o : o ? ? n O .p K c Fo. i0 $o ova? 6N4a 3a"? a L1 3 i! ? o '516) a z Q J m W F- a) H W H cH SHEET No. 3 ;:?,,> 0 • CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2005 Case Number: FLD2005-07075 Agenda Item: El Owner: Rophie Family Partnership Applicant: DC Customs. Representative: Mr. John Atanasio, President of Alba Consulting Corgi Address: 2430 Gulf to Bay Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly Street) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 11.39 feet, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) and to permit a six-foot high non- opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly Street and east along Kilmer Avenue), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Commercial (C) District; Commercial General (CG) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.964 acres; 41,997 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Automobile Sales (south building), Vacant (north building) Proposed Use: Automobile Sales (south building), Vehicle Service Major (north building) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Low Medium Density Residential, Single Family Residence LAND USES: East: Commercial, Retail Sales with Accessory Vehicle Service, Advanced Auto Parts South: Commercial, Overnight Accommodations Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 1 of 1.0 0 CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: West: Commercial, Retail Sales & Adult Use (south building) and Vehicle Service Major (north building) "A to Z" Auto Care The surrounding area is a mixture of detached dwellings, retail sales and service, vehicle sales and vehicle service (both accessory and primary). An overnight accommodation use and a mobile home park exist across Gulf to Bay Boulevard to the south. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.964-acre site is located on the northwest corner of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue and on the south side of Shelly Street. The site is a triple frontage with approximately 150 feet of frontage on Gulf to Bay Boulevard to the south, 280 feet of frontage on Kilmer Avenue along the east, and 150 feet of frontage on Shelley Street to the north. The property is currently developed with a Vehicle Sales use, Enterprise Rent A Car, in the 2,520 square foot building to the south, facing Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The 9,000 square foot building to the north has been vacant for approximately two years and the previous occupant. Lokey Motors operated their body shop at this location. No evidence could be found in City records indicating that vehicle service had been approved at this location. Parking for the entire site is not well defined. Parking for the current development of the north building is located in a non-conforming gravel lot between the building and the Shelley Street right-of-way. Parking for Enterprise Rent A Car is asphalt and located between the building and Gulf to Bay Boulevard right of way. The Enterprise Rent A Car parking lot is non-conforming to front setbacks for Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue, with the asphalt running from property line to property line. Additionally, the non-conforming lot line to lot line parking lot causes an inability to meet the required fifteen-foot landscape buffers along the Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue rights of ways. Gulf to Bay Boulevard is designated a scenic corridor requiring additional landscaping. The existing building proposed for vehicle service is one-story in height and has four overhead bay doors, two of which front on Kilmer Avenue and the remaining are internal to the west of the site. The existing signage on the building indicates Lokey Motors and Saturn Body shops. The proposal only includes improvement to the site and the building located to the north of the Enterprise Rent A Car business. The Enterprise Rent A Car portion of the site will receive no improvements due to lease constraints involving Enterprise Rent A Car and the property owner. An Advanced Auto Parts store with accessory vehicle service exists across Kilmer Avenue to the east of the site. There are detached dwellings to the north of this site across Shelley Street. An existing retail sales/service strip center, including an adult use is located contiguously to the west. In addition, behind the retail sales/service strip center is an existing vehicle service use, A to Z Auto Care also contiguous to the west. The applicants also own this property. To the south, across Gulf to Bay Boulevard is an existing motel, office building, and two mobile home parks. Proposal: The applicant is proposing a car customizing business where customers bring their automobiles for personalized services such as: painting, custom bodywork, interior work, audio and video systems, and installation of wheels for the northern portion of the parcel only. The southern portion is to remain as existing. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 2 of 1.0 0 • At a predevelopment meeting, prior to the applicant making their Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, staff advised the applicants of the concerns of a major vehicle service use at this location and that applying for this application would require that the entire site be brought into compliance with current code requirements. The proposal includes a request to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district, as a Comprehensive Infill Project. The code defines Vehicle service, major as: Vehicle repairs which include engine repairs where the cylinder head, pan or exhaust manifold is removed; steam cleaning of engines; undercoating; vehicle spray painting; auto glass repair and replacement; repair and replacement of transmission, differential, transaxles, shaft and universal joints, wheel and steering linkages and assemblies; rebuilding and upholstering the interior of vehicles; customizing, restoration or rebuilding of vehicles; chassis, frame, body, fender and bumper molding, straightening, replacement and finishing; and repairs involving extensive welding, racing of engines or lengthy or overnight idling of engines. Staff's concern relative to the vehicle service major use is its proximity to the single-family residential dwellings located across Shelley Street to the north. Based on the proposal that has been submitted, Staff's concern is that the vehicle service major use is too intense for an area that has two existing vehicle service businesses in the immediate vicinity and in addition the close proximity to the single- family residential development to the north. As such, Staff does not support this proposal. The applicant is also requesting a waiver to the parking and landscaping requirements to bring the Enterprise Rent A Car (southern) portion of the property into compliance as required for establishing a new use on the site, as a whole. Staff's concern relative to the parking and landscaping waiver is that the Community Development Code requires when a new use or a change of use occurs that certain aspects of site redevelopment occur. These aspects specifically are parking, landscaping, and signage. While staff realizes that even the proposed partial redevelopment of this site is an improvement to the site, the failure to bring the remainder of site (the frontage along the scenic corridor, Gulf to Bay Boulevard) is not in compliance with the Code. As such, Staff does not support this proposal for the following reasons: The purpose of the Landscape Code Division is to establish minimum landscaping/tree protection standards in order to promote the preservation of existing tree canopies, to promote the expansion of that canopy and to promote the enhancement of the quality of existing and future development in the city. The purpose of Scenic Corridors is to establish areas in the city which have particular significance, in terms of tourism, economic development or community character, and which therefore should have enhanced and differentiated landscaping requirements. It is anticipated that specific corridor plans will be approved by the city commission for each corridor and that Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 3 of 10 • • when such plans are adopted, they shall constitute the requirements for landscaping along these corridors. The purpose of the Parking Code Division is to establish standards which promote the orderly, efficient, and safe layout of parking and loading areas. In addition, it is not understood how partial redevelopment of the site will constitute an upgrade or create a form and function that will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity and the City of Clearwater, as a whole. A positive aspect of the proposal includes a reduction to front (north along Shelly Street) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 11.39 feet. Staff believes this will create an orderly and safe parking layout that should be more appealing to the residential neighbors to the north. The proposal includes reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement). Staff does not support this portion of the proposal due to the non- compliance with the above-mentioned parking, landscaping, and scenic corridor issues. The proposal also includes a reduction to front (the southern portion of the property, east along Kilmer Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Staff does not support this portion of the proposal due to the non-compliance with the above-mentioned parking, landscaping, and scenic corridor issues. The Comprehensive Landscape Program Architectural Theme criterion requires that the landscaping be demonstrably more attractive than otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under minimum landscape standards. The landscaping proposed with the redevelopment of this property only consists of the northern portion of the property, and as such does not meet the above criterion. The Comprehensive Landscape Program Community Character criterion requires that the landscaping will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The landscaping proposed with the redevelopment of this property only consists of the northern portion of the property, and as such does not meet the above criterion. The Comprehensive Landscape Program Property Values criterion requires that the landscaping will have a beneficial impact on the value of the properties in the immediate vicinity. While the landscaping proposed will have a beneficial impact to the residential properties located to the north of the parcel. The landscaping proposed with the redevelopment of this property only consists of the northern portion of the property, and as such does not meet the above criterion. A positive aspect of the proposal includes a request to permit a six-foot tall site obscuring fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly Street and east along Kilmer Avenue) that will buffer Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 -Page 4 of 10 the parking area to the residential neighbors to the north, in a more appealing manner than existing conditions. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area). The applicants parking analysis indicates that the proposed parking for the northern portion of the property provides only two standard and one handicapped parking spaces for customers. Staff does not support this portion of the proposal because the number of parking spaces for customers appears to be inadequate. Additional positive aspects of the proposal include the construction of a sidewalk within the rights-of- way of Kilmer Avenue for pedestrian safety, where no sidewalk presently exists. Site drainage proposed within a ten-foot wide landscape buffer along the north side of the property along the Shelley Street property line. A fifteen-foot landscape buffer is to be provided along the northern portion of Kilmer Avenue. This enhancement will not only provide a storm water treatment area, but the additional landscaping will assist in buffering the fence and parking area to the residential neighbors to the north, in a more appealing manner than existing conditions. The applicant is proposing a single attached sign. It will need to meet the minimum requirements of the sign code or the applicant may apply for consideration under the Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP). Staff's opposition for this project is based on the reasons enumerated above, including, but not limited to the failure to incorporate improvements to the entire site and the intensification of the incompatible uses to the residential properties in the immediate vicinity. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Project criteria (Section 2-704.C) have not been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 5 of 10 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS: (Sections 2-704.0: STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT IMPERVIOUS .90 X SURFACE RATIO ISR 0.95 maximum FRONT SETBACK North: 11.39 feet (to pavement) and (25 feet) South: Zero feet (to existing X* pavement) and East: 15 feet (to pavement). SIDE SETBACK West: Zero feet (to existing pavement) X 10 feet HEIGHT (30 feet) 25 feet X PARKING SPACES 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per unit) X* (1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA)) -14 required * See discussion under Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL CRITERIA (Section 2-704.0: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X* development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the followin : use; intensity, other development standards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; 4. The use or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment X ro'ect is compatible with adjacent land uses; 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X* comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment X* project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X* street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 6 of 10 0 • 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel 1 proposed for development, * See discussion under Analysis. CYIMPLIANCF. WITH GFNF.RAT. APPT.IC"ARTT.ITV CTANDARiIC Ni-etinn 1_9111- Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X* coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The parcel proposed for redevelopment is a triple fronted lot addressed off of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, which is an established scenic corridor and requires enhanced landscaping requirements; 2. The Community Development Code requires when a new use or a change of use occurs that the parking, landscaping, and signage of the parcel will be brought into compliance with current code; 3. The proposed request to waive the required development requirement (parking, landscaping, and signage) for the Enterprise Rent A Car (southern) portion of the parcel proposed for development is not consistent with the requirement of current Code; 4. The proposed partial redevelopment of the parcel will not create a form or function that will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity or the City of Clearwater as a whole. 5. The proposed Vehicle Service Major use is defined as repairs which include engine repairs where the cylinder head, pan or exhaust manifold is removed; steam cleaning of engines; undercoating; vehicle spray painting; auto glass repair and replacement; repair and replacement of transmission, differential, transaxles, shaft and universal joints, wheel and steering linkages and assemblies; rebuilding and upholstering the interior of vehicles; customizing, restoration or rebuilding of vehicles; chassis, frame, body, fender and bumper molding, straightening, replacement and finishing; and repairs involving extensive welding, racing of engines or lengthy or overnight idling of engines; Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 1.8, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 7 of 10 0 0 6. The vehicle service major use is too intense for an area that has two existing vehicle service businesses in the immediate vicinity; 7. The proposed use is compatible with to the adjacent Retail strip center to the west. The close proximity to the single-family residential development to the north is not compatible; 8. The existing unimproved parking area for the northern portion of the property will be replaced with an improved parking lot that will be buffered with a six-foot tall fence and a landscaping ten-foot landscaping buffer along the north and a fifteen-foot landscaping buffer along the east provide the residential properties to the north of Shelley Street a more appealing view; 9. The proposed ten-foot wide storm water drainage swell along Shelley Street is a positive aspect of the request, as it will provide some water quality treatment to a site that has no existing facilities. 10. The proposed construction of a sidewalk within the rights of way of Kilmer Avenue for pedestrian safety is a positive aspect of the request; 11. Three of the five Comprehensive Landscaping program criteria have not been met due to the partial redevelopment of the parcel; 12. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal does not comply with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria per Section 2-704.C; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is not in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Based on the above findings, Staff recommends denial of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly Street) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 11.39 feet, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) and to permit a six-foot high non-opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly Street and east along Kilmer Avenue), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. with the following bases: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, Per Section 2-704.C. 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 1. 8, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 8 of 10 0 E 3. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area and will not enhance other redevelopment efforts. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff. ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application J Schodder, Planner I S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Wending cases)Up for the next CDBIGujf To Bay 2430 - DC CustomeslGulf to Bay 2430 StaffReport.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 -Page 9 of 10 FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: LtV1 LDI ?1 FAX: Phone: FROM: Phone: ??s•+.sTor? 5 DATE: fD 13 c >'-S-7 SUBJECT: -DC MESSA NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) /D Oct. 13 2005 02:19PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94469050 Oct.13 02:15PM 03'52 SND 10 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). `, r_ 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 18, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (coni'd from 09-20-05) KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 & 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7- 10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 2. Alan Rophie, Ralph Rophie, Cecila Betech, & Cheryl Cohen (Rophie Family Partnership) are requesting Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 sq ft building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly St) setback to pavement from 25 ft to 11.39 ft, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Ave) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Blvd) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 sq ft of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 sq ft of gross floor area) and to permit a 6-ft high non-opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly St and east along Kilmer Ave), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Ave) landscape buffer from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Blvd) landscape buffer from 15 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), 0 as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Vehicle Service Major) at 2430-iGulfzto' Bay--Blvd-,l See 18-29-16, M&B 13.04. Assigned Planner: dahn:Schodtler-:Planner I:-IFLD2005-07075 3. Liberty Mirabel LLC (Raxit & Punit Shah, and Battle Creek Hospitality Inc) are requesting Flexible Development request to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 47 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 13 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 4.75 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and 10 ft (to pool), and a reduction in the lot width from 150 ft to 142 ft as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Secs 2-404.F and 2-1602.C and H. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 211 & 221 Skiff Pt, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5-A Lots 33 & 34. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-04036 4. Clearwater Centre LLC (Guy & Susan Bonneville, Sebastian & Elizabeth Dorner, & Anthony Dorner) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for ht (148 ft to roof deck where a maximum of 75 ft would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use (71 attached dwellings and 44,300 sq ft of non-residential floor area), and to increase the building ht an additional 27 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (71 attached dwellings and 44,300 sq ft of non-residential floor area)] at 1100 Cleveland St, Bassadena Blk A, Lots 1-14 incl part of Lot 15, and Bassadena Blk B Lots 9-11, and 14-25. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07067 5. Melodie A Ferguson, Melodie A Ferguson Tre Rem, Robert M Pennock, Robert M Pennock H Tre Rem, and Paul & Tracey Kelley are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 65 ft (to roof deck), with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the north (side) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the south (rear) and east (rear) setbacks from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07025) of.2 dwelling units from 120 Brightwater Dr under the provisions of Secs 4-1402 and 4-1403. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 665 & 667 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 6 & 7. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07078 6. Lenny Cristino is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of a restaurant with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 96 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing outdoor seating deck), from 25 ft to 22 ft (to canopy), and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 14.3 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure) and a reduction of parking spaces from 43 spaces to 9 spaces, under the provisions of See 2-704.M, and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 9 ft (along S Fort Harrison Ave), and a reduction to the rear (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Restaurant) at 1101 S Fort Harrison Ave, Magnolia Park Blk 39, Lot 1, parts of Lot 2 & Vac Lotus Path Adj on N. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 06053 • • 7. Thomas C & Dorothy J Jessup are requesting a Flexible Development approval (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Ave) setback from 25 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 15.5 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew St) setback from 25 ft to 4.2 ft (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Rd) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Ave) from 25 ft to 8.5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 11 ft (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along N Keene Rd) from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.13; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Ave) landscape buffer from 10 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew St) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 4.2 ft (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along N Keene Rd) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 9 ft (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Bicycle shop (retail sales and services) with parking] at 1770 Drew St, Woodmere Hts, Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06054 8. Patrick E & Toni V Hickey are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 ft to 63.75 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 16 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Doctor's office) at 107 McMullen Booth Rd, Sec 16-29-16, M&B 21.05. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07077 9. Two to One LLC (T. Edward Entreken, V.P.) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit the re-establishment of retail sales and services (financial institution) as a primary use within the Office (O) District with a reduction to the side (west) setback from 20 ft to 4.7 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.B, and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4.7 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (north) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (financial institution) and office] at 1825 Sunset Point Rd, Pinellas Groves, Parts of Lots 7 & 8. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07079 10. Hamilton Family Trust (Regatta Bay of Clearwater, LLC, Roland Rogers) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 5 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 sq ft to 7,280 sq ft, a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 60 ft, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 9 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 8 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 77 ft (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (5 condominiums)] at 862 Bayway Blvd, Bayside Sub No 6, Unit C, Blk D, Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07080 11. Clearwater Retail Group LTD is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings as part of a mixed use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (east along S Missouri Ave) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Rd) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 9.7 ft (to dumpster enclosure) and an increase to building ht from 25 ft to 52.25 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional 15.5 ft for a decorative clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Rd from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (32 condominiums)] at 810 S Missouri Ave, Clearwater Retail, Lot 10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07076 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. • L Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 10/02/05 r CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2005 Case Number: FLD2005-07075 Agenda Item: El Owner: Rophie Family Partnership Applicant: DC Customs. Representative: Mr. John Atanasio, President of Alba Consulting Corp. Address: 2430 Gulf to Bay Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly Street) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 11.39 feet, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) and to permit a six-foot high non- opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly Street and east along Kilmer Avenue), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Commercial (C) District; Commercial General (CG) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.964 acres; 41,997 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Automobile Sales (south building), Vacant (north building) Proposed Use: Automobile Sales (south building), Vehicle Service Major (north building) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Low Medium Density Residential, Single Family Residence LAND USES: East: Commercial, Retail Sales . with Accessory Vehicle Service, Advanced Auto Parts South: Commercial, Overnight Accommodations Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 1 of 10 West: Commercial, Retail Sales & Adult Use (south building) and Vehicle Service Major (north building) "A to Z" Auto Care CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is a mixture of detached dwellings, retail sales and service, vehicle sales and vehicle service (both accessory and primary). An overnight accommodation use and a mobile home park exist across Gulf to Bay Boulevard to the south. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.964-acre site is located on the northwest corner of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue and on the south side of Shelly Street. The site is a triple frontage with approximately 150 feet of frontage on Gulf to Bay Boulevard to the south, 280 feet of frontage on Kilmer Avenue along the east, and 150 feet of frontage on Shelley Street to the north. The property is currently developed with a Vehicle Sales use, Enterprise Rent A Car, in the 2,520 square foot building to the south, facing Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The 9,000 square foot building to the north has been vacant for approximately two years and the previous occupant. Lokey Motors operated their body shop at this location. No evidence could be found in City records indicating that vehicle service had been approved at this location. Parking for the entire site is not well defined. Parking for the current development of the north building is located in a non-conforming gravel lot between the building and the Shelley Street right-of-way. Parking for Enterprise Rent A Car is asphalt and located between the building and Gulf to Bay Boulevard right of way. The Enterprise Rent A Car parking lot is non-conforming to front setbacks for Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue, with the asphalt running from property line to property line. Additionally, the non-conforming lot line to lot line parking lot causes an inability to meet the required fifteen-foot landscape buffers along the Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue rights of ways. Gulf to Bay Boulevard is designated a scenic corridor requiring additional landscaping. The existing building proposed for vehicle service is one-story in height and has four overhead bay doors, two of which front on Kilmer Avenue and the remaining are internal to the west of the site. The existing signage on the building indicates Lokey Motors and Saturn Body shops. The proposal only includes improvement to the site and the building located to the north of the Enterprise Rent A Car business. The Enterprise Rent A Car portion of the site will receive no improvements due to lease constraints involving Enterprise Rent A Car and the property owner. An Advanced Auto Parts store with accessory vehicle service exists across Kilmer Avenue to the east of the site. There are detached dwellings to the north of this site across Shelley Street. An existing retail sales/service strip center, including an adult use is located contiguously to the west. In addition, behind the retail sales/service strip center is an existing vehicle service use, A to Z Auto Care also contiguous to the west. The applicants also own this property. To the south, across Gulf to Bay Boulevard is an existing motel, office building, and two mobile home parks. Proposal: The applicant is proposing a car customizing business where customers bring their automobiles for personalized services such as: painting, custom bodywork, interior work, audio and video systems, and installation of wheels for the northern portion of the parcel only. The southern portion is to remain as existing. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 2 of 10 0 0 At a predevelopment meeting, prior to the applicant making their Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, staff advised the applicants of the concerns of a major vehicle service use at this location and that applying for this application would require that the entire site be brought into compliance with current code requirements. The proposal includes a request to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district, as a Comprehensive Infill Project. The code defines Vehicle service, major as: Vehicle repairs which include engine repairs where the cylinder head, pan or exhaust manifold is removed; steam cleaning of engines; undercoating; vehicle spray painting; auto glass repair and replacement; repair and replacement of transmission, differential, transaxles, shaft and universal joints, wheel and steering linkages and assemblies; rebuilding and upholstering the interior of vehicles; customizing, restoration or rebuilding of vehicles; chassis, frame, body, fender and bumper molding, straightening, replacement and finishing; and repairs involving extensive welding, racing of engines or lengthy or overnight idling of engines. Staff's concern relative to the vehicle service major use is its proximity to the single-family residential dwellings located across Shelley Street to the north. Based on the proposal that has been submitted, Staff's concern is that the vehicle service major use is too intense for an area that has two existing vehicle service businesses in the immediate vicinity and in addition the close proximity to the single- family residential development to the north. As such, Staff does not support this proposal. The applicant is also requesting a waiver to the parking and landscaping requirements to bring the Enterprise Rent A Car (southern) portion of the property into compliance as required for establishing a new use on the site, as a whole. Staff's concern relative to the parking and landscaping waiver is that the Community Development Code requires when a new use or a change of use occurs that certain aspects of site redevelopment occur. These aspects specifically are parking, landscaping, and signage. While staff realizes that even the proposed partial redevelopment of this site is an improvement to the site, the failure to bring the remainder of site (the frontage along the scenic corridor, Gulf to Bay Boulevard) is not in compliance with the Code. As such, Staff does not support this proposal for the following reasons: The purpose of the Landscape Code Division is to establish minimum landscaping/tree protection standards in order to promote the preservation of existing tree canopies, to promote the expansion of that canopy and to promote the enhancement of the quality of existing and future development in the city. The purpose of Scenic Corridors is to establish areas in the city which have particular significance, in terms of tourism, economic development or community character, and which therefore should have enhanced and differentiated landscaping requirements. It is anticipated that specific corridor plans will be approved by the city commission for each corridor and that Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 3 of 10 0 • when such plans are adopted, they shall constitute the requirements for landscaping along these corridors. The purpose of the Parking Code Division is to establish standards which promote the orderly, efficient, and safe layout of parking and loading areas. In addition, it is not understood how partial redevelopment of the site will constitute an upgrade or create a form and function that will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity and the City of Clearwater, as a whole. A positive aspect of the proposal includes a reduction to front (north along Shelly Street) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 11.39 feet. Staff believes this will create an orderly and safe parking layout that should be more appealing to the residential neighbors to the north. The proposal includes reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement). Staff does not support this portion of the proposal due to the non- compliance with the above-mentioned parking, landscaping, and scenic corridor issues. The proposal also includes a reduction to front (the southern portion of the property, east along Kilmer Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Staff does not support this portion of the proposal due to the non-compliance with the above-mentioned parking, landscaping, and scenic corridor issues. The Comprehensive Landscape Program Architectural Theme criterion requires that the landscaping be demonstrably more attractive than otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under minimum landscape standards. The landscaping proposed with the redevelopment of this property only consists of the northern portion of the property, and as such does not meet the above criterion. The Comprehensive Landscape Program Community Character criterion requires that the landscaping will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The landscaping proposed with the redevelopment of this property only consists of the northern portion of the property, and as such does not meet the above criterion. The Comprehensive Landscape Program Property Values criterion requires that the landscaping will have a beneficial impact on the value of the properties in the immediate vicinity. While the landscaping proposed will have a beneficial impact to the residential properties located to the north of the parcel. The landscaping proposed with the redevelopment of this property only consists of the northern portion of the property, and as such does not meet the above criterion. A positive aspect of the proposal includes a request to permit a six-foot tall site obscuring fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly Street and east along Kilmer Avenue) that will buffer Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 4 of 10 the parking area to the residential neighbors to the north, in a more appealing manner than existing conditions. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area). The applicants parking analysis indicates that the proposed parking for the northern portion of the property provides only two standard and one handicapped parking spaces for customers. Staff does not support this portion of the proposal because the number of parking spaces for customers appears to be inadequate. Additional positive aspects of the proposal include the construction of a sidewalk within the rights-of- way of Kilmer Avenue for pedestrian safety, where no sidewalk presently exists. Site drainage proposed within a ten-foot wide landscape buffer along the north side of the property along the Shelley Street property line. A fifteen-foot landscape buffer is to be provided along the northern portion of Kilmer Avenue. This enhancement will not only provide a storm water treatment area, but the additional landscaping will assist in buffering the fence and parking area to the residential neighbors to the north, in a more appealing manner than existing conditions. The applicant is proposing a single attached sign. It will need to meet the minimum requirements of the sign code or the applicant may apply for consideration under the Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP). Staff's opposition for this project is based on the reasons enumerated above, including, but not limited to the failure to incorporate improvements to the entire site and the intensification of the incompatible uses to the residential properties in the immediate vicinity. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Project criteria (Section 2-704.C) have not been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 5 of 10 L ]l COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS: (Sections 2-704.0: 0 STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT IMPERVIOUS .90 X SURFACE RATIO ISR 0.95 maximum FRONT SETBACK North: 11.39 feet (to pavement) and (25 feet) South: Zero feet (to existing X* pavement) and East: 15 feet (to pavement). SIDE SETBACK West: Zero feet (to existing pavement) X 10 feet HEIGHT (30 feet) 25 feet X PARKING SPACES 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per unit) X* (1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA)) -14 required * See discussion under Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL CRITERIA Section 2-704.C): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X* development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the followin : use; intensity, other development standards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; 4. The use or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment X roject is compatible with adjacent land uses; 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X* comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill, redevelopment X* project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X* street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 6 of 10 • 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. * See discussion under Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X* coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Develo ment is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impact s on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The parcel proposed for redevelopment is a triple fronted lot addressed off of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, which is an established scenic corridor and requires enhanced landscaping requirements; 2. The Community Development Code requires when a new use or a change of use occurs that the parking, landscaping, and signage of the parcel will be brought into compliance with current code; 3. The proposed request to waive the required development requirement (parking, landscaping, and signage) for the Enterprise Rent A Car (southern) portion of the parcel proposed for development is not consistent with the requirement of current Code; 4. The proposed partial redevelopment of the parcel will not create a form or function that will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity or the City of Clearwater as a whole. 5. The proposed Vehicle Service Major use is defined as repairs which include engine repairs where the cylinder head, pan or exhaust manifold is removed; steam cleaning of engines; undercoating; vehicle spray painting; auto glass repair and replacement; repair and replacement of transmission, differential, transaxles, shaft and universal joints, wheel and steering linkages and assemblies; rebuilding and upholstering the interior of vehicles; customizing, restoration or rebuilding of vehicles; chassis, frame, body, fender and bumper molding, straightening, replacement and finishing; and repairs involving extensive welding, racing of engines or lengthy or overnight idling of engines; Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 7 of 10 6. The vehicle service major use is too intense for an area that has two existing vehicle service businesses in the immediate vicinity; 7. The proposed use is compatible with to the adjacent Retail strip center to the west. The close proximity to the single-family residential development to the north is not compatible; 8. The existing unimproved parking area for the northern portion of the property will be replaced with an improved parking lot that will be buffered with a six-foot tall fence and a landscaping ten-foot landscaping buffer along the north and a fifteen-foot landscaping buffer along the east provide the residential properties to the north of Shelley Street a more appealing view; 9. The proposed ten-foot wide storm water drainage swell along Shelley Street is a positive aspect of the request, as it will provide some water quality treatment to a site that has no existing facilities. 10. The proposed construction of a sidewalk within the rights of way of Kilmer Avenue for pedestrian safety is a positive aspect of the request; 11. Three of the five Comprehensive Landscaping program criteria have not been met due to the partial redevelopment of the parcel; 12. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal does not comply with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria per Section 2-704.C; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is not in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Based on the above findings, Staff recommends denial of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly Street) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 11.39 feet, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) and to permit a six-foot high non-opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly Street and east along Kilmer Avenue), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. with the following bases: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-704.C. 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 8 of 10 •' 3. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area and will not enhance other redevelopment efforts. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: John Schodder, Planner I ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S. (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDBIGuI(To Bay 2430 - DC CustomesIGulf to Bay 2430 StaffReport.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 9 of 10 • CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2005 Case Number: FLD2005-07075 Agenda Item: El Owner: Rophie Family Partnership Applicant: DC Customs. Representative: Mr. John Atanasio, President of Alba Consulting Corp. Address: 2430 Gulf to Bay Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly Street) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 11.39 feet, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) and to permit a six-foot high non- opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly Street and east along Kilmer Avenue), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Commercial (C) District; Commercial General (CG) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.964 acres; 41,997 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Automobile Sales (south building), Vacant (north building) Proposed Use: Automobile Sales (south building), Vehicle Service Major (north building) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Low Medium Density Residential, Single Family Residence LAND USES: East: Commercial, Retail Sales with Accessory Vehicle Service, Advanced Auto Parts South: Commercial, Overnight Accommodations Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 1 of 10 • 0 West: Commercial, Retail Sales & Adult Use (south building) and Vehicle Service Major (north building) "A to Z" Auto Care CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is a mixture of detached dwellings, retail sales and service, vehicle sales and vehicle service (both accessory and primary). An overnight accommodation use and a mobile home park exist across Gulf to Bay Boulevard to the south. ANAT.VCTC- Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.964-acre site is located on the northwest corner of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue and on the south side of Shelly Street. The site is a triple frontage with approximately 150 feet of frontage on Gulf to Bay Boulevard to the south, 280 feet of frontage on Kilmer Avenue along the east, and 150 feet of frontage on Shelley Street to the north. The property is currently developed with a Vehicle Sales use, Enterprise Rent A Car, in the 2,520 square foot building to the south, facing Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The 9,000 square foot building to the north has been vacant for approximately two years and the previous occupant. Lokey Motors operated their body shop at this location. No evidence could be found in City records indicating that vehicle service had been approved at this location. Parking for the entire site is not well defined. Parking for the current development of the north building is located in a non-conforming gravel lot between the building and the Shelley Street right-of-way. Parking for Enterprise Rent A Car is asphalt and located between the building and Gulf to Bay Boulevard right of way. The Enterprise Rent A Car parking lot is non-conforming to front setbacks for Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue, with the asphalt running from property line to property line. Additionally, the non-conforming lot line to lot line parking lot causes an inability to meet the required fifteen-foot landscape buffers along the Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Kilmer Avenue rights of ways. Gulf to Bay Boulevard is designated a scenic corridor requiring additional landscaping. The existing building proposed for vehicle service is one-story in height and has four overhead bay doors, two of which front on Kilmer Avenue and the remaining are internal to the west of the site. The existing signage on the building indicates Lokey Motors and Saturn Body shops. The proposal only includes improvement to the site and the building located to the north of the Enterprise Rent A Car business. The Enterprise Rent A Car portion of the site will receive no improvements due to lease constraints involving Enterprise Rent A Car and the property owner. An Advanced Auto Parts store with accessory vehicle service exists across Kilmer Avenue to the east of the site. There are detached dwellings to the north of this site across Shelley Street. An existing retail sales/service strip center, including an adult use is located contiguously to the west. In addition, behind the retail sales/service strip center is an existing vehicle service use, A to Z Auto Care also contiguous to the west. The applicants also own this property. To the south, across Gulf to Bay Boulevard is an existing motel, office building, and two mobile home parks. Proposal: The applicant is proposing a car customizing business sinri}aT-t-o where customers ca-bring their automobiles for personalized services such as: painting, custom bodywork, interior work, audio and video systems, and installation of wheels for the northern portion of the parcel only. The southern portion is to remain as existing. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 2 of 10 At a predevelopment meeting, pri rr to p elicant making their Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, staff advise 1 oft concerns of a major vehicle service use at this location and that applying for this application would require that the entire site be brought into compliance with current code requirements. The proposal includes a request to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district, as a Comprehensive Infill Project. The code defines Vehicle service, major as: Vehicle repairs which include engine repairs where the cylinder head, pan or exhaust manifold is removed; steam cleaning of engines; undercoating; vehicle spray painting; auto glass repair and replacement; repair and replacement of transmission, differential, transaxles, shaft and universal joints, wheel and steering linkages and assemblies; rebuilding and upholstering the interior of vehicles; customizing, restoration or rebuilding of vehicles; chassis, frame, body, fender and bumper molding, straightening, replacement and finishing; and repairs involving extensive welding, racing of engines or lengthy or overnight idling of engines. Staff's concern relative to the vehicle service major use is its proximity to the single-family residential dwellings located across Shelley Street to the north. Based on the proposal that has been submitted, Staff's concern is that the vehicle service major use is too intense for an area that has two existing vehicle service businesses in the immediate vicinity and in addition the close proximity to the single- family residential development to the north. As such, Staff does not support this proposal. The applicant is also requesting a waiver to the parking and landscaping requirements to bring the Enterprise Rent A Car (southern) portion of the property into compliance as required for establishing a new use on the site, as a whole. Staff's concern relative to the parking and landscaping waiver is that the Community Development Code requires when a new use or a change of use occurs that certain aspects of site redevelopment occur. These aspects specifically are parking, landscaping, and signage. While staff realizes that even the proposed partial redevelopment of this site is a%a+&F improvement to the site the failure to bring the remainder of site (the frontage along the scenic corridor, Gulf to Bay Boulevard) iLe compliance 4s-- nat within the xal; the Code. As such, Staff does not support this proposal for the following reasons: The purpose of the Landscape bode livision is to establish minimum landscaping/tree protection standards in order to promote the preservation of existing tree canopies, to promote the expansion of that canopy and to promote the enhancement of the quality of existing and future development in the city. The purpose of Scenic Corridors is to establish areas in the city which have particular significance, in terms of tourism, economic development or community character, and which therefore should have enhanced and differentiated landscaping requirements. It is anticipated that specific corridor plans will be approved by the city commission for each corridor and that Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 3 of 10 • 0 when such plans are adopted, they shall constitute the requirements for landscaping along these corridors. The purpose of the Parking Code I-vision is to establish standards which promote the orderly, efficient, and safe layout of parking and loading areas. In addition, it is not understood how partial redevelopment of the site will constitute an upgrade or create a form and function that will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity and the City of Clearwater, as a whole. A positive aspect of the proposal includes a reduction to front (north along Shelly Street) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 11.39 feet. Staff believes this will create an orderly and safe parking layout that should be more appealing to the residential neighbors to the north. The proposal includes reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement). Staff does not support this portion of the proposal due to the non- compliance with the above-mentioned parking, landscaping, and scenic corridor issues. The proposal also includes a reduction to front (the southern portion of the property, east along Kilmer Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Staff does not support this portion of the proposal due to the non-compliance with the above-mentioned parking, landscaping, and scenic corridor issues. The Comprehensive Landscape Program architectural theme criterion requires that the landscaping be demonstrably more attractive than otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under minimum landscape standards. The landscaping proposed with the redevelopment of this property only consists of the northern portion of the property, and as such does not meet the above criterion...) The Comprehensive Landscape Program Community Qharacter criterion- ?requires that the landscaping will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Wftffelhe landscaping proposed with the redevelopment of this property only consists of the northern portion of the property and it will enhance the immediate vicinity. u?wP?,P rho lan?craninv r?r{?pncPr=»+1? *?'^^Y men o this p*epy-e}}1?? -eesi? y. There fort the above criterion for landscaping thatnwill enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater has not been met. The Comprehensive Landscape Program 6mmunity Character criterion requires that the landscaping will have a beneficial impact on the value of the properties in the immediate vicinity. While the landscaping proposed will have a beneficial impact to the residential properties located to the north of the parcel. The landscaping proposed with the redevelopment of this property only consists of the northern portion of the property, and as such does not meet the above criterion. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 -Page 4 of 10 A positive aspect of the proposal includes a request to permit a six-foot high non-opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly Street and east along Kilmer Avenue) that will buffer the parking area to the residential neighbors to the north, in a more appealing manner than existing conditions. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area). The applicants parking analysis indicates that the proposed parking for the northern portion of the property provides only two standard and one handicapped parking spaces for customers. Staff does not support this portion of the proposal because the number of parking spaces for customers appears to be inadequate. Additional positive aspects of the proposal include the construction of a sidewalk within the rights-of- way of Kilmer Avenue for pedestrian safety, where no sidewalk presently exists. Site drainage proposed within a ten-foot wide landscape buffer along the north side of the property along the Shelley Street property line. A fifteen-foot landscape buffer is to be provided along the northern portion of Kilmer Avenue. This enhancement will not only provide a storm water treatment area, but the additional landscaping will assist in buffering the fence and parking area to the residential neighbors to the north, in a more appealing manner than existing conditions. i (Y?i tt ? ?'?nu.? The applicant is proposing a ::Igu?eattached sign•and 5 will need to meet the requirements of the sign code or .apply for Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) tel. 7l4- 04PI, 0'j m aPP/y l-o? c?-v s , MIA" - - - eprima ff concern and objection is t e request to only redevelop the rth portion the pro and not t erty as a whole. Staff's opposition for this project is based on the reasons enumerated above. We e proposa wou the P---- north, the failure to bring the entire site into compliance is inconsistent with the Community Development Code in general and previously approved projects along this portion of Gulf to Bay Boulevard. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Project criteria (Section 2-704.C) have not been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. f "Y 1- 0 e't.'t? -,? c? ?i? o ILI, rte ' A`f ms?-?' e- ,?? J -OVA r Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 5 of 10 • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS: (Sections 2-704.C): E STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT IMPERVIOUS .90 X SURFACE RATIO ISR 0.95 maximum FRONT SETBACK North: 11.39 feet (to pavement) and (25 feet) South: Zero feet (to existing X* pavement) and East: 15 feet (to pavement). SIDE SETBACK West: Zero feet (to existing pavement) X 10 feet HEIGHT (30 feet) 25 feet X PARKING SPACES 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per unit) X* (1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA)) -14 required * See discussion under Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL CRITERIA (Section 2-704.0: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X* development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the followin : use; intensity, other development standards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; 4. The use or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment X roject is compatible with adjacent land uses; 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X* comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment X* project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X* street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 6 of 10 • . . • 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. * See discussion under Analysis. C;UNIFLIANU WlM ULNEXA-L AYYLIUABILll Y Sl'ANDA"S (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X* coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significant) impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation im acts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The parcel proposed for redevelopment is a triple fronted lot addressed off of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, which is an established scenic corridor and requires enhanced landscaping requirements; 2. The Community Development Code requires when a new use or a change of use occurs that the parking, landscaping, and signage of the parcel will be brought into compliance with current code; 3. The proposed request to waive the required development requirement (parking, landscaping, and signage) for the Enterprise Rent A Car (southern) portion of the parcel proposed for development is not consistent with the requirement of current Code; 4. The proposed partial redevelopment of the parcel will not create a form or function that will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity or the City of Clearwater as a whole. 5. The proposed Vehicle Service Major use is defined as repairs which include engine repairs where the cylinder head, pan or exhaust manifold is removed; steam cleaning of engines; undercoating; vehicle spray painting; auto glass repair and replacement; repair and replacement of transmission, differential, transaxles, shaft and universal joints, wheel and steering linkages and assemblies; rebuilding and upholstering the interior of vehicles; customizing, restoration or rebuilding of vehicles; chassis, frame, body, fender and bumper molding, straightening, replacement and finishing; and repairs involving extensive welding, racing of engines or lengthy or overnight idling of engines; Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 7 of 10 0 , . 0 6. The vehicle service major use is too intense for an area that has two existing vehicle service businesses in the immediate vicinity; 7. The proposed use is compatible with to the adjacent Retail strip center to the west. The close proximity to the single-family residential development to the north is not compatible; 8. The existing unimproved parking area for the northern portion of the property will be replaced with an improved parking lot that will be buffered with a six-foot tall fence and a landscaping ten-foot landscaping buffer along the north and a fifteen-foot landscaping buffer along the east provide the residential properties to the north of Shelley Street a more appealing view; 9. The proposed ten-foot wide storm water drainage swell along Shelley Street is a positive aspect of the request, as it will provide some water quality treatment to a site that has no existing facilities. 10. The proposed construction of a sidewalk within the rights of way of Kilmer Avenue for pedestrian safety is a positive aspect of the request; 11. Three of the five Comprehensive Landscaping program criteria have not been met due to the partial redevelopment of the parcel; 12. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal does not comply with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria per Section 2-704.C;' 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is not in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Based on the above findings, Staff recommends denial of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 square foot building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly Street) setback to pavement from 25 feet to 11.39 feet, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area) and to permit a six-foot high non-opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly Street and east along Kilmer Avenue), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Avenue) landscape buffer from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard) landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. with the following bases: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-704.C. 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 -Page 8 of 1.0 3. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area and will not enhance other redevelopment efforts. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: John Schodtler, Planner I ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIGuIf To Bay 2430 - DC CustomeslGulf to Bay 2430 StaffReport.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07075 - Page 9 of 10 DC CUSTOMS @ 2430 GULF TO BXY BLVD PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS LOCATION MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EASTERN 150 FEET(CONTANNGIL.NT SF ROL)OFRLSt PIOPERTYDE9lRIHED.Ct FOLLOWS PER DR M31 PG 526: FROM ME SW CORNER OF 130E HE 171 OF SECTION IA TOWNAH6 NSOUTH. RANGE 16 CUT, RUN SA9VN55' E ALONG THE EAST- CENIERLIYE OF SANSECDON A, 11457 FEET TO THE Cc72TERLNE FOR KILO ER AYEIHENCR N Ig128' E AIDNG 111E [flRF:RLL' -OF KI MER AVENUE, 550.01 FEET TOME SOUIR EFNE OF GULF TO RAY ACRES MT ADD- AS RECORDED NTHE PLAT BOOK 52. PAGE 55 OF ME PUBLR7 RECORDS LY PNRIA9 CUUNFy, FLORF-;THENa N 19 41 IB• W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GAIT IT) MY ACP.FS FIRST ADDMCN3N50FEEFTHENCES"2""w,130@FEETTOTSLEMOP BEGM-GLESSTHE SOUKS 50 W FEET AND THE FASTS W FEET FOR THE ROAD RKAROF-Ay. PROJECT CONSULTANTS CIVLENGINEERSIPLANNERS: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: LA CPN. COPLEY DESIGN ASSOCIATES 1416 COURT STREET 1666 LANEY DRIVE CLEARWATER FLORIDA33756 PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 37683 PHONE 7274169000 PHONE: 721-7832M0 SURVEYORS: ARCHITECTS: CORNERSTONE ING. @ SURVEYING, INC, (TO BE DETERMINED) 2433 GULF TO BAY BLVD, ' CLEARWATER FLORIDA 34625 PHONE: (727) 799-1763 FAX: (727) 7931764 LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES POWER: PROGRESS ENERGY 2166 PALMETTO STREET, BLDG F CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 CONTACT: CRAIG KOPKAU PHONE: (727) 562-5660 TELEPHONE: VERIZON 1280 EAST CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 CONTACT: DAN FARMER PHONE(727) 5621165 CONTACT: BOB CARN PHONE:(727) 5621126 SEWER: CITY OF CLEARWATER IOO SOUTH MITRLEAVE CLEARWATER FL PHONE 727-5624600 GAS. CLEARWATER GAS SYSTEMS 400 MYRTLE AVE N CLEARWATER, FL 34615 CONTACT: TOM ROBERTSON WATER: CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 SOUTH MYTRIEAVE CLFARWATFR,FL PHONE: 727-56246M CABLE RIGHBIOUSE NETWORKS, LUC 2530 DREW ST CLEARWATER, FL 33515 CONTACT: CHRIS NTGHTENGAIE N-h s1 VYhrtmnR S1 ..? CMu•n 51 ' : ' ' rl r4 ? ^ f n IrIR r a ?. GIJf To Bop Blvd Y grn SI `, ) Sth? ? 4 SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 16 E 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD , CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA DC CUSTOMS ALBA CONSULTING CORP CONTACT : JOHN ATANASIO 1420 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FL 34756 PHONE: 727-443-0718 FAX: 727-447-2369 PREPARED BY: "WON UAL TIN -e+00111 0? r?s S??2yc?L Z, . L0S P - ? r?.?2. YY-a?,L %?e,,(•Ea.t w s ? y" r,?, . 5 G r?q !sue - 56PC?T6 p???L 5. 00-t 1 Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc. Certificate of Authorization # 00008766 Scott Lincoln, P.E. Fl Reg # 50035 1446 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: 727-446-9000 FAX: 727-446-9050 PLAN SET INDEX I. COVER SHEET 2. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPFBC SURVEY 3. SITE PLAN 4. PAVING, GRADING$ DRAINAGE PLAN 5. EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATION VIEWS Lt. LANDSCAPE PLAN ORIGINAL. v a/Q R f fIi ? ki w I •A• ??'?? )l4 ?o A y o ` h PROJECT SITE DATA PROPERTY LOCATION: (PARCEL M# lBP29116f00000113010400) 2430 GULF TO MY (NW GDRNER OF GULF TO BAYA KIIAU,V AVE) CLEARWATER PNFLA9 COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPERTY OWNER: ALAN ROPHM; RALPH ROPSEE: CECELLA BEIEClt G68YLCOHE CA ALAS CONSULTNG CORP. HOHNATANAEIO. P(ESmem 42000URT STREET,CTFARWATERFIARIDA337566II" PROPERTY ZONING: SIZE I6PPFSENRYPDNED.CLCIXMOACW.7 BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: STANDARD RFOURED PROVIDED AS COMPRERENSNE DEpi FRONT(RRAEAI: I1'TOBLDGA21- 25.F TO BIDG(ERISTiNG) A 15' TO PAVRMENT FRONT(SHELLM: 1Y t0 LOGA2s,`RT 62.14 TO BLOG(IXLITIWTA 99f2OCVRRRAVI}.IET 51DEIwFSTtYMNOROALI IE TOBVBDNG 21.84 TOBIDGIE%691\G) .SIDE(SOUTBCOMAERLTAL) 25' TO BUILDING 117.56'TOBIDI-ISNGI MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: A?u.Dwm-. 2P owsrD: xr MAXIMUM FAR I ISR: COMMERCGLFAR ALLOWED: R11 PROPOSED: 0300 c0A0AERC m ALIDWFD: Is PROr0.9ED: 0.9W5 PARKING SPACES: REOULRED Ls SPACES PER IA00 SF (RFFEREVCNG VFNICTESEIRYKEVSE NIXi20NNG1 REOURUD 15' 9,000 Sr BLOC I Alp SF • HSPA- PROVIDED: (HH-02) EXSEPIOR. HH[NTFRIORGAMGE - 216mcEs COVERAGE: (EXISTING: ON DEVELOPMENT SITE) BU IIDNGAREA(DCOPTONS) 9.W0 ST lIA3x nu- AREA(BNTERPRL9O 3lH SF VESHMAR USE APFA(VUA-OCNSTOMA) IJ,M1RI SF 12.19% YEMCNAR USEARFA(ENIFRPPISE) MA-F SIDEwA1R US TID L MPERV -SF U 37.M% 0% WYS% A S 1L IO DRY RETENTION PONT) RSF 0Y. PERIMETER GREEN 137 SF 0. R5% INTERIOR GREEN SPACE Rs pI TOTALPERNIDUS OS R15% TOTAL STTEARES 0997 SF IW.W% COVERAGE: (PROPOSED: ON DEVELOPMENT SITE) BUILDING AAFA(IIC-ARMS) 9,001 SF 21.41% BNLLINGAMA(E2RAYN. E7 11115E 7.99% - VEHICTRARUSEARFA(VUA- fMTOM.S) I.-SF 2156% VEHICULAR USE AREA(ENTE-F) 14199 AF 19.83% sIDEw,vR n ss TOTAL IMPERVIWS 17.8195F -5% DRY RETN ON POND I.OW SF 2.59% PERIMETER GREEN 2.IIASF 5.12%. NTENOR GREEN SPACE II O% WA ROD) 940 SF>9016F REO D 214%. H0J7%OFVUAI(DO 7 4 O ALPFRVIq SF 6 1L1,9I 9976E i0TAL1TEAALA IWAO% I V E q '':NOTE TOTAI6RI AREA FOR OC CUSTOMS 11 1-111 . FLOOD ZONE DATA: FEIN A. ZONE ' R' . PER FRIM MAP PANEL NO. 125096 0017 0 (--H JUL z.] 2m CITY C)r .C:._. - DC CUSTOMS Q GULF TO BAY BLVD. LA CIVIL JOB # 043-003 w w a T.' O U G ra O U 1? SITE STORMWATER TREATMENT 6" VERTICAL SWALE CURBING P.5 15' SHELLY ST 2 13' '1 OR I G7N A L o-a 0, 50' 100' o SCALE: 1 = 50 z GRASS R/W STRIP SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL j` V.- APPROXIMATE R/W LINE i' DEEP WATER QUALITY r r v - 'L, L v V ,v (N TS) SECTION A-A PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE SITE LEGEND HANDICAP PARKING l? PROPOSED DRAINAGE INLET PROPOSED CURB SITE BOUNDARY LINE -•••-•••- CENTER LINE OF ROAD - - - RIGHT-OF-WAY --- EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - - - - - PROPOSED CONCRETE TYPICAL TYP HANDICAP HC # PARKING SPACES SIDEWALK S/W 5' RADIUS R5' LINEAR FEET LF SQUARE FEET SF GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CURB RADII TO BE 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL CURB TO BE 6" VERTICAL CURBING. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED FROM FACE OF CURB. STRIPING NOTES 1. TYPICAL PARKING SPACE SHALL BE STRIPED WITH A 4" WHITE STRIPE. 2. SEE DETAILS FOR HANDICAP PARKING. BUILDING USE DATA BUILDING COMPONENT AREA SF STORAGE / PARTS 688 SF OFFICE / WAITING 416 SF DISPLAY 740 SF PAINT BOOTH 2,576 SF VEHICLE SERVICE AREA 4.580 SF TOTAL = 9,000 SF SIGN LEGEND NO TEXT OR SYMBOL SIZE R1-1 STOP 30"x30" R3-1 NO RIGHT TURN 24 x24" R3-7 LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT 30"x30" R5-1 DO NOT ENTER 30'x30" R6-1 ONE WAY 36x12" R3-5R RIGHT TURN ONLY 24"x24' ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. TREAT -Ai MNT FDR PROPOSED NEW PARKING AREA ONLY. PEDESTRIAN SHELLY ST E SHELLY + (E SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 RAMP & _ ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER A (PER CITY STANDARDS) 6' TALL FENCE 20' SIGHT TRIANGLE C 10 se m LANDSCAPE cuReR(Tm) 20, k2N ?- - N89'42'21 W 294.50' _ BUFfF1R I/ ATO Z I'A AUTO w B . a..... EX451 j x w w SIDEWALK e IRD NT a .. CARE z c?iN I' 1.4- CANOPY 12.13' 23' I N 5' IWDd 9?1 +? as 23 CONCRETE; e d ti ?' IE a, (I?IG m 0? I m GREEN r u.9a' s: SIDEWALK J \ a O U' Q `, 1.... u UO z a-w IC + it 24.95' S z I\? (-4C:.CY; Iw w 6 m w a 6 STRIPED Z O STORAGE/ ' Nom: / N Wc PARTS 0 am CRO$S WALK ! tl C / m - I rn V \ ? - ?? ? GARAGE FOR VEHICLE MAIN iTRY ANQSERVICE & PA IRKING 2'j` ? m Z # 41 PROPd?ED 30 SF O - I; 24.3e' ro' ' ' " - TENANT SIGN ON WALL (.) I-I!DRI_4 G u O I PRODUCT o1 aw . AISLE rc DISPLAY 131 uw 5' ; n W 2.89' ...... ..... w m I i JI 6• OFFICE 15.06' Q NI a PAINT BOOTH WAITING ?!\ w o rol v ? 100' -? ° LLIo II .-- - CC G to A 25.1' < 04 v _ I O Q w F a 30.2' N W O =Z K L PROPOSE RETAIL SHOPS D 30 SF 1 N w d1LL TENANT W Z N P'',•I rF G V ON UJ io ? v .. N ?s - WALL I Q N m LA =2 x ENTERPRISE a aw i < co r d [, z o 424 Z _r3 a> RANT-A CAR Z ?o b0 r PROPOS? 5' WIDE .. I CONCRET SIDEWALK "-W a k. X Au 0; w ! 0 LOT LINE 44.57 LOT LINE 100' LOT LINE 150' a _..._.. S89'40'31 "E 294.58 I E PROPOSED ? DRIVEWAY ¦. ?' DRIVEWAY i DRIVEWAY - • / PEDESTRIAN . ! O __. - - - _ ---- -... ------? :-RAMP a a.----- EXISTING EXISTING PEDESTRIAN GULF TO BAY (SR 60) FIRE HYDRANT RAMP (100' R/W) D p ?1 f XISTING L ATE E I?LET JUL 2?•7 Q 00 J Q m 0 u- J -cc ? O M U. lie N Q (aj 3 W co a U O N U U 3 a a U y N o?y' o 9 w 0 c o " o" W?^a o?,6 g ee„o Z Q J CL W H F 0 F F 44F v3F SHEET No. 3 STORMWATER SITE ST ORIGII AL TREATMENT SHELLY 0 50 100 0 6" VERTICAL SWALE CURBING 15' 2' 13' z SCALE: 1" = 50' 4' ___T' 3' a° y 0 PARKING ° _- 1 4 4 _- GRASS R/W STRIP I - --.- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WHEEL _ ..... I I 1 v ..._ ........_..._.._ Il. - - - - - - - - - - - - - a APPROXIMATE R/W LINE 1' DEEP WATER QUALITY I ?- ! TREATMENT SWALE FOR III ??, _ SHELLY ST _ I - NEW PARKING AREA ONLY.µ I ' SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 - (6D' R W /) A 1u51s!nag u f_ a 10 LL- 1; " N89'42'21'W 294.50 .• ? A P PR,e?,X IMR (N TS) - - .. - - _. _.. _..•_.- G u SECTION A-A s _ 1 PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE I A TO Z A ° a AUTO !A THE 5;060 SF AREA SHADED HEREON V) WILL BE RESURFACED AND GRADED ^ x w w x TO DRAIN TOWARD THE PROPOSED STORMWATER CALCULATIONS CARE r <- I I STORMWATER SWALE FOR TREATMENT I ? !l fl ?w i _ Lrl rl".I Y p> o0 THE PROPOSED STRRMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT SWALE IS DESIGNED TO TREAT THE FIRST 1/2 J a "T INCH RUNOFF FROM THE SHADED PRKING AREA TO BE RESURFACED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT: Q I T. m o f 'I _ i 0 o PARKING AREA = 5,060 SF V L ?? I T•!; TREATMENT VOLUME _ (0.5 INCHES / 12 INCHES PER FT) + 5,060 SF W IN ? c TREATMENT VOLUME = 211 CF OF STORAGE REQUIRED J m I I = r a = > _oP NO ATTENUATION VOLUME IS REQUIRED SINCE THE IMPERVIOUS AREA Of THE PROPERTY WILL BE REDUCED BASED ON THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. V I -' '- I Z c b o W PROPOSED SWALE CAPACITY: r---------- I ' I 0 „ Ua VOLUME 818 SF(TOP) + 0 SF (BOT) 2 * 1' DEEP = 409 CF ' i o WII Q cl? GRADING LEGEND JI I I a' cy) -0I ?I "31 ELEVATION EL IN o TYPICAL TYP w I ro: W CLEANOUT CO - j O L w o' F'- Q 3 INVERT ELEVATION IE N I o -_ I v YI, II W Q Z J' f <,I 1FiJ I '? O ! Q CC Z Q HANDICAP HC RETAIL SHOPS w ,a LL p a EXISTING ELEVATION V " H W cn? G?•I Fr I .? ,! ?'I: w l Q Hw En ILL PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION w -? I w I N pC u Q -j (A DRAINAGE INLET ® I 0 o G a rc = p ? i ENTERPRISE Q a ..! 4 0 !n o v MITERED END SECTION D pcYlo t2 t d. t 24 , w Z O RANT A CAR O I.L. PROPOSED SWALE STORMWATER FLOW -- ?--- - -1 O o E< I ch D F, wi; N F Q EXISTING SWALE STORMWATER FLOW w PROPOSED VALLEY FLOW t-{ I I ? oe Z T 3 SURFACE STORMWATER FLOW -inn I (n J Q DIRECTION OF STORM WATER FLOW LOT LINE 44.57 LOT LINE 100' I d O O L? ?..._..._..._... LOT LIN.... < .._..._...J ? I N STORM DRAIN SD 589'40'31 E 294.58 r I' - x C9 0 Z_ HELICALLY CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE HCAP ELLIPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ERCP Q V a REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RCP GULF T(OD BAY (SR 60) . ,. I POLY VINYL CHLORIDE PIPE PVC O I FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FFE SIDEWALK S/W W ?w77 W STORM SEWER STRUCTURE NUMBER 5-50 JUL 77 20' EROSION CONTROL PROPOSED HIGH POINT ---- PLANNING&DEtj'EL(,)tT.+^tvlSVC SHEET NO. Ah Ah • GINA L a o o Z z . a t ? - to r t r d?Lr _ 3 F'?.1 H °' " " 1 o^ a " t, 'All I PARKNG ENT?v Dla'R t -SOUTH AWTIING f 'h. SOUTH ABUT ENTERPRISE TING RENT - B001alTli ,E TRY ENTRY COCK A CAR e61LDINC - i e t - ?A CAR BUILDING i t N Lne IM" 0 a. a U ..:. .? _ ...,.?..W t? 65 a 0 r _5 SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION WEST BUILDING ELEVATION c•'0uo m Q - EXISTING ARCHITECTURAL - FEATURE AT ROOF LINE TO ,'- - - .. - REMAIN 30 SF TENANT WALL SIGN (SOUTH FACE OF BLDG) ..`... .? :` Q '"- 30 SIF TENANT WALL SIGN ENTIRE FACE OF BUILDING TO BE PRESSURE WASHED co N AND CLEANED BY OWNER W - ENTIRE FACE OF BUILDING ' .. - _ VEHICLE PAINT BOOTH EXIT DOOR '" ""- --- - LL Z TO BE PRESSURE WASHED AND CLEANED BY OWNER - -. „ I - -- ENANT = in . _ ?M Sh"5? ! 5 1 `h &DDY SNQV (D a O O Y. > W Y cv) Lu 04 ?([3? \-VEHICLE SERVICE J C Z .. PARKING EXIT ODOR PROPOSED ENTRY DOOR - O c? -PROPOSED ENTRY DOOR KILMER AVE TO BE UNDER AWNING. ' Z y V 1 -- .• PAVEMENT AREA TO BE LANDSCAPING FOR PROPOSED IN THIS ARE x1H s WALK V X t PROPOSED REAR DOOR t TO BE UNDER AWNING F / WITH Sr WALK .. / 1 / a - - - c » t4""•f h r,?d? (fie ? u TT n1 a s ?y'?k x" Y ter?r`x r{?? r ,?. V Q DETERIORATED PAVEMENT TO % SHELLE 1 STREET REA PARKING AREA TO BE FENCED- Z AUTO CARS ALL A TO E RREMEMCARE OVED ? w : =V a? >?• ? e ?" > t° }+Y ?` BE REMOVED AND 01AYID R AND LANDSCAPED FROM VIEW OF OCCUPANCY BY NN TE T7TANT 1 1 ,5w , „u . r tS ,t t? X W W SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES y , k l +,rC ? : W ICE" aF v,h NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION EAST BUILDING ELEVATION SHE ET 5 No. ORIGINAL GENERALLAND5CAPE NOTE5 J s _ APPROXIMATE R/W LINE 1' DEEP WATER QUALITY Plint nnrsery swndme.Parts shall be 5hall be 8 ? SHELLY ST NEW PARKING SWALE FOR EW PARKING AREA ONLY healthy. tree o al pest and d4tax. healthy. z Allplan:fhabbeeontanerq,_ eeptasrefedonplan 3 All pa- andtrees ,hallhwe ta,lht trunks thnotwrst,lmottngorothe, defeanK daractmxes. , 4. Mulch hall be 100%P ne Bark n,talkd a -- tMCknev of 2'. 7 (60' R/W) SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 5. sdsLUb95%weee6a5t.Ixgostlm'Fwratao.,nsralledw?mwghtlomts A G. M dimtn9id5 shah be field dteyed by the Landscape Cmtnctor pis W -t-her with any - - - - - 4 3 50 L UA POM - d,xreparm reported to the Lndxape hrchtect. hAl be n ,!aba or rnstalxlon techniques do not adhere 7. ,All e peohed on the pbn,.lfe to the pal6emas, they wall be elected by the Undrape Ar h:tect with sr-hed it-1, and mstallahon .o - - - - - - - _- - - _--- - ---- -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - mt by o t. arced oul by the Landscape Contractor rz no aadroond Wit. No subsP[utwns of rrut s to the draw s or s eohrat:ae,h,1I be made 8 ml r fan d ? _ \ = / ! - p u . . < e s o ge 3. Al re pred pe,mts are to be pranded by the -.1i' m conhxto, uriev,,peah.1y stated otherwise in N89 42 21"W 294. 1 50' 30' ;4 t the speaheatom. allowed an the '0ContractorWent sans shad not es pct - _ I .-._... - L - - ? f a, .any, ' '' o uux,uxm a ens b ord_ lhspao and speclmaGom Contractor stub be responsible sod weals as shown 1 2 brf hur weeds shalf be 4Wled wtth PNJ " dud per manula All pcWrersroposed laodwpe and sped tion, 13 Landscape Contraua 9hall pronde all ne-ary s,te prep-ton re pred to ready tie, to for plantmq as w A TO Z H - L ??3 pU A ml _ " mm I,, uAe sp"fied l F l f f 90 d 14 Th d C d ll t d L b d a I - ? I 240 eu an warranty an gwrantec a ena , an or or a peno ays or e sooe ontractor xl a o r ('? ' o - LAM ,hubs and groudcever, palms and! trees. Warranty and guarantee penod shall begin wpm date of complaboo. AUTO 1 N J \ `\ "• ?'? / - 15 Ad reps rs andror mplacanenb,hall be made by the brdxape Contracts wth" 10 werGng dap upon not, cat on of any defiaenc-ly the owner or ther representative - CARE W I DA ? X W IGAll guesGws regard:g the Iardscapc Plans and 5peo&atwn, shall be deeded to the Undrape a et a 2 7872B4D 4 0 4 a< LI G FERTILIZATION d Ilk ' J k N' YYn W I O 100 TJN 75 Jp- ` 3` mH:a' 5hrubs and Trees $' pJl P ' Q 1 'm I (L' LMG V cl - 1 UA All trees and shrubs shall be fertdued with 'Pgnlani 20-15-5 plant ng bblet, at tme of pant og and pis to t 1 ^ J U REP -v\ W , I 5 :nstaWnm of plant pt 6x4611. Tablets 51uh be placed dormy around the root ball at a depth that Is between the coddle -d bottom of the root ball. ;, y , W W ? 32 o zPU Application Rate. : HfB 20 1 Gallon Cantina, 21 InamU let 3 G.11. ra tablets i.___ ' SGallonCa>vnt' 3 211.Wets 7 G C t 4 tabl O U - _ - - ? 20 4 j 1 ? I a, net to yam . o e Tre,: 3 tablets per each I12' caliper of tNnk I 20' 50 Groondcover Areas 30 . _.. _ _ _.... ....., JP An ywrdwwer a-, shall receive ferblmbon wth'o a lame rel-e fe thhoer per -fixtureh IMG sP_fi ban,. LI n a I UA m Z 3 ZFu Qy J HIB 12 an ou aww" bCe dHib' a of so' .wn o• ? mw"m LU: IX 04 r- - 7 !t Z . II A n Z en 4n to O . _._ ._ ....... - - -.. 4 - _j TT .T ? ` a w L m r t Y ' `''S ` " i N ' TREE PLANTING DETAIL TREE PROTECTION DETAIL LL 0 t RE AIL SHOPS - W V 4.a L v R U > i y?XST Nw.1 K:`...'.y to ?J LLI Q< , ._- ? ENTERPRISE I Q E"' : sn a:w rw '• d?,an 1 ? V V t? O N u c ,/r.1 02416 V24L 0 1; LA "2 iT, N -A-CAR RANT Z w;' ? G __ SHRUD PUNTIN DETAIL J I W LJ Plant Matcrla15 Schedule a N J Quantity Code Dotan-I Name Common Name 5peof.-t- 5pacmg cd E l w "1 I S (I W I 3 46 t118 1.16-us spp. thbl5cus 3 gal 24". 24" 30" o.c. l 7 ICD Il d f d H ll 24" 30" b d B 3 24" / 0 tb C EL , ex cornuta or ll ur or y ga o.c. u o x LOT LIN E 44.57' LOT LINE 100' 1 ..AN ?hi LOT LINE 150' : ? 200 UM Lanatna spp. Yellow Lantana gal 12' h[ x 12'5pr. 18' ox. s L l lageretroemlaIndex Crape Myrtle 19 ht x 5 spr, 2.5' cal. a1 x I r AatetGrass 12" ht z - 18"o 45 LMM "s c J $8 ' ' " a t ' .... „•?. ""?"..-.?. _•.._• ••?••• it ;? ? g ., . . p .. 1 1 z'ht s r Muswrl x 2 Giant Uno ai 1 0 MG LroF 3 e 1 9 40 31 E 294 5 .... .. 8 r r ? . p j ., p . _ ' " ' . - - -- - - - :1 . 1: -, .-: - fr.;: _l = -? ":_?.._- - -- a o.. Parsons Jumper 3 gal., 12 fit. x 18 spr 30 . 1 Jump- r50n 50 POM o s spP Podaarpus 3 gal, 24" ht x 24' spr 30' o,c. Fl DA d Indian Hawthorn 3 jai., 18' ht x 18 spr. 30' o.c. 39 RI Raphlo s Ind- 100 TJV Trachelospermum Jasmmoldles Var. Confederate Jasmme 3 jai., 18^ ht. x 18" spr. 30'.- 20 TJN Trachelospermum asatlcum Dwarf Confederate Jasmme I gal„ G" ht. x 12" spr. 18" o.c. - ro GULF TO BAY (SR 60) I 7 DA 1,11mu5aLta Elm 12'ht.x4'5pr,2.5"ea1. LANDSCAPE E 8 ZFU Zama furfuracea Cardboard Palm 7 gal., 30" x 30" 3G' o.c. ARCHITECTS (100R/W) 1666 Laney Drive Palm Harbor, Hurt x34683 Ph e727787-7840 Fax 7777854017 Gnds,,pe Arehiteeture Site Planning 0 25' 50 100' Con-1 Admim,ma n t , ° JOB NO. 250'n Scale 11 = 501-01 LSHEET -I LL V `I?I ! IJ- A- 111 1 L? t4 ' -x ?C Q 0 0 0 0 I! 5t?FJE, w t-r14 a4Nva vu *J fit, 7.er.V Rtes s&rW-ftrr0 elk W-fin I b . LOCATION MAP PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS DC CUSTOMS @ 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD LEGAL DESCRIPTION THEEASTERN 150 FEFT(CONTAINING4L997 SF MOL)OF THIATPROPERTY DESCRIBED AS FROM THE SW CORNER OF THE NE III OF SECTION IBTOWVSIIH'M SGUTR.P NGE 16 EASTRUN 5 89'4015' E ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENT-NNE OF SAID SDCIION 15, 324.57 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE FOR IOIMER AVE THENCE N 1'01RA• E ALONG THECENTERIINEOF KBMFR AVENUE,33001 FEETTOTHESOUTH LINE OFGULF TO BAYACRES FIRSTADDMONAS RECORDEDLNTHEPIATBOOR1i PAGE550FTHEPUBICUCORDSDFPLNETUS000 I, FLORIDA' THENCE N 89.41lg' W ALONG THE SOUTH WNEOF SAIDGUIFTOBAYACRESFI ST ADDOD N,,3N50FEELTHENCES1.0313•W,33002FEETMO EMO OFBFD NGLFSSTHW SOUTH 50.00 FEET AND THE EAST 30W FEET FORTIS ROAD RIGHT4)BWAY Vim- 51 7_. d m qq GhBUSaf S1 ' ?tiA4y r4 a .. tv r 4 GHI1 To Bay Blvd t ! E b t 1 1:.. if k `b b4 + e T'... 1 .._.. . ,.._i . t„) ..._x.....1 »?_...:.... -V76 ST ?ii .. `` 6th SY ° 1 Alf ?+ SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 16 E PROJECT CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERSPLANNERS: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: LA CIVIL COPLEY DESIGN ASSOCIATES 1476 COURT STREET 1666 LANEY DRIVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33116 PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 PHONE: 1274769000 PHONE: 727.7871840 SURVEYORS: ARCHITECTS: CORNERSTONE ENG.@SURVEYING, INC, (TOBEDETERMINED) 2433 GULF TO BAY BLVD. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34625 PHONE: (727) 799-1763 FAX: (727) 799-1764 LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES POWER: PROGRESS ENERGY 2166 PALMETTO STREET, BLDG F CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 CONTACT: CRAIG KOPKAU PHONE: (727) 5625660 TELEPHONE: VERIZON 1280 EAST CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 CONTACT: DAN FARMER PHONE(727) 562-1165 CONTACT: BOB CAR' PHONE:(727) 5621126 SEWER: CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 SOUTH MYTRLEAVE CLEARWATER, FL PHONE: 7275624600 GAS: CLEARWATER GAS SYSTEMS 400 MYRTLE AVEN CLEARWATER, FL 34615 CONTACT: TOM ROBERTSON WATER: CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 SOUTH MYTRLE AVE CLEARWATER, FL PHONE: 727-5624600 CABLE: BRIGHTHOUSE NETWORKS, LLC 2530 DREW ST CLEARWATER, FL 33515 CONTACT: CHRIS MGHTENGAIE 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD , CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA DC CUSTOMS ALBA CONSULTING CORP CONTACT : JOHN ATANASIO 1420 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FL 34756 PHONE: 727-443-0718 FAX: 727-447-2369 PREPARED BY: J A? II V/L Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc. Certificate of Authorization # 00008766 Scott Lincoln, P.E. F1 Reg # 50035 1446 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: 727-446-9000 FAX: 72 7-446-9050 PLAN SET INDEX 1. COVER SHEET 2. BOUNDARY SURVEY 3. SITE PLAN 4. PAVING, GRADING $ DRAINAGE PLAN 5. EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATION VIEWS LL LANDSCAPE PLAN `?V AAY?R r / ?? 4 4 In e ?} C taB PROJECT SITE DATA ,! PROPERTY LOCATION: (PARCEL ID# 18/29/161000001130/0400) ? 1130 GO AY (MN CORNER OF GULF TO RAY A: RHME4 AVD CLEARWATER PINEIIAS COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPERTY OWNER: ALANROPNIE;RALPHROPHIE;CECELUBE ;;rHFRYLC01?'LO AIRArONSULIINGCORP.HOHNATANASIO PREHHND '-COURT STREET. CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 339564147 PROPERTY ZONING: SITE S PRESENTLY IDNED: C(OOMMERCLU.) BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: STANDARD REQUIRED PROVIDED AS COMPREHENSIVE INFBL FRONT (/ IF41 25' TO BLDGA2f' PVMT 25.1' TO BLDG(MSTING) A If' TO PAVEMENT FRONT(SHESLEY). 25'TOBLDGAiSPVM 6249 TO BLDG (-STING)d 9.94 TO I-PAVEMENT EIDE(WEST-COMMEACA.) I TO BUILDING E4.A9 TO BIDo(ENSTING) SIDE(SOIRH.C MMMIRCTAL) 25- TO BUILDING 127.56' TO BLDG Dp TING) MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: .ALLOWED: 29 PROPOSED: 25 MAXIMUM FAR/ ISR: COMMMUALFAR, ALI. E.: 051 PROPOSED: -2 COMMERCIALSR, ALLOWED:091 PROPOSED:. 09005 PARKING SPACES: REWIRED: 1.5 SPACES PER I.-SF (EEFFRE\'CING VETIIC'IDSERVICE USE IN IRTEONING) REQUIRED: 15.9,0005F BLDG ILWOS - 14 SPACES PROVIDED :(1)HICI(12)P ERIORI(11)LYTFRIORGARAGE=NSPACES COVERAGE: (EXISTING: ON DEVELOPMENT SITE) HDIIDIN'G AREA(DCCIISTOOS) 9W0SF 2L43% BUI LDING AREA(ENTMERPRISEN 1311 SF 199% VEIBINLAR USE AREA(VUADC CL'$TDAS) 11,601 SF 5259% VEIIINLARUSEAREA(ENTERPRISE) 11,6945E )724% SIDEwnll( OSF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 4L-SF 0% 90.15% DRY RETENTION POND "I (I % PERIMETER GREEN INTERIORGREENSPA(E 111 EF 05F OR5% 0!L TOTALPERVIOUS OSF 085% TOTALSITEARE, 'L597 SF Im- COVER AGE: (PROPOSED: ON DEVELOPMENT SITE) BUIDINGAR&1(000USTOAIS) 9W0 SF 21.U% BUIIDUGAREA (ENTERPRISE) 3355 SF 7 VEHICULAR USE AREA(NDA-DC CUSTOMS) 9,061 SF EI IS% VEHICULAR USE AREA (ENTERPRISE) 16,399 SF 3905% SWFW'AIK OSF 0% TOTALIMPERATOUS 37.8195F 9005% DRY RETENTION POND I,OW SF 2.59% PERIAIETERG1- 2,249 SF 5.12 % _NTENOP GREEN SPACE1105I GREEN WA?RFQ1?1 I TOTALPERVIOUS 940 SF SF 940 SF 1907 SF REDS 179 SF 2.24%(1037%OFVUA)(OC) 9.95 % TOTAL SITEARFA 41,9975F NOTE: TOTAL SITE AREA FOR DCCUSTOMS ISY.958 SF FLOOD ZONE DATA: FE E1.A. 70NE • I • . PER FRIM ASAP PANEL, NO. 121UM NO D (0814911 `?"?S D] 1 W 1 0 U F/J t:. ID CID P DC CUSTOMS Q GULF TO BAY BLVD. LA CIVIL JOB 17043-003 SITE STORMWATER TREATMENT 6" VERTICAL SWALE CURBING-\ Q-5, GRASS R/W STRIP v v? v z,i ST 0' 50' 100' SCALE: 1" = 50' N SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL APPROXIMATE R%W LINE 1' DEEP WATER QUALITY SHELLY ST TREATMENT SWALE FOR PROPOSED NEW PARKING G AREA ONLY. PEDESTRIAN SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 RAMP & _ ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER (60 R/W) A LANDING I f ,I I I ?' (PER CITY STANDARDS) 4 I- 6' TALL FENCE ?, •:??? u I NTS 20' SIGHT TRIANGLE SECTION A-A <__ ____________ m °°i LANDSCAPE °n 6" VERTICAL )/ ;! U N89'42'21 W 294.50' 0 BUFFF?2 = CURB (TYP) 20' PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE SITE LEGEND HANDICAP PARKING 61 PROPOSED DRAINAGE INLET PROPOSED CURB SITE BOUNDARY LINE - - - CENTER LINE OF ROAD - - RIGHT-OF-WAY ..... EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT -.- PROPOSED CONCRETE TYPICAL TYP HANDICAP HC # PARKING SPACES SIDEWALK S/W 5' RADIUS R5' LINEAR FEET LF SQUARE FEET SF GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CURB RADII TO BE 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL CURB TO BE 6" VERTICAL CURBING. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED FROM FACE OF CURB. FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. 2. THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPOSED PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE PROJECT SHALL MEET NFPA 30 A REQUIREMENTS FOR REPAIR GARAGE 2000 EDITION. 4. APPROVAL OF AN ENGINEERED SPRAY BOOTH SHALL BE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHALL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. NO CUSTOMER ACCESSABLE PARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED INSIDE BUILDING. SHELLY 15' 13' / FENCE 1 G € ® ® ® ?? :? 5 A TO Z W/ GATE B p A AUTO w I f ?. T? EXIST e ', ( IC+ 'YFIRE BUILDING USE DATA CARE _ ? J sCA aPY 2.73' 5 I D?, ?R _ BUILDING COMPONENT AREA SF Y ` as 23 23 CONCRETE ?"w 4 ALK IT....... fi4.94 SIDEW ; ( ?4 STORAGE / PARTS 688 SIF `E{Ii."TIN 1 X ? > a„6of 14 :I tt?N ?S Q ? r0 ?m ua a GREEN D 4.96' 5'. OFFICE / WAITING 416 SF / h, v s 24.95' z N z ; w? II II , ,??" I aw DISPLAY 740 SF W /, h O6 m STORAGE/" STRIPED GARAGE FOR VEHICLE ARTS 5 5 CROSS] WALK 1> PAINT BOOTH 2,576 SF ANOP VEHICLE SERVICE AREA 4.580 SF 0 / - ?' -? MAI<J tNTRY V p SERVICE & PARKING JI'' TOTAL = 9,000 SIF 24.38' iD' i - - .... ........ _ I riDRIVEG w O PRODUCT NT ?I AISLE - DISPLAY of aLL ; 5- 24.89' w '- .-. _...... __ - --....-..._ 8 Nm n / ro ls'.a6'? Q SIGN LEGEND OFFICE m 6 PAINT BOOTH WAITING 3 of of NO TEXT OR SYMBOL SIZE a R1-1 STOP 30"x30" wl Nr 100' ? "_ WIo R3-1 NO RIGHT TURN 24"x24' w CC R3-7 LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT 30'x30" v I JI J O w -- - .: a R5-1 DO NOT ENTER 30"x30" R6-1 ONE WAY 36'x12" I ?# - 30.2 C4 ~ d Y R3-5R RIGHT TURN ONLY 24"x24" N i ?I F II W ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL ON EXISFI1 AI o a z UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. RE (AIL SHOPS fi R'-jl'H- I;; 30050SEq N ,j W ,?4 TENANT 'II V LLJ INO , T ST: h r ^. _tl' N 1 \ SIGN ON I II I a I- ° w w i 0 w Y- .. L-WALL v II ?u STRIPING NOTES 0 Z° o as ! Q ' oa ENTERPRISE a a? 1. TYPICAL PARKING SPACE SHALL BE STRIPED I a°41!i r E 1 4?4 1 o w ow z WITH A 4" WHITE STRIPE. o>_ RENT A CAR I J p v PROPO5tD 5 WIDE E H EWALK 2. SEE DETAILS FOR HANDICAP PARKING. - -- 20.64' ^a < CONCRET SID _ NA 1 d o J ?I $ • g II III SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY NOTES II S i'`K I W J LOT LINE 44.57 LOT LINE 100' LOT LINE 150' a 1. SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS ADJACENT - - - - - - "'- -"'_"'_"' . f \` x TO OR A PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE _ S89'40'31"E 294 58' r PROPOSED DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED CONSISTENT WITH DRIVEWAY ¦-? DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY PEDESTRIAN CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT _ .... RAMP a--==-- SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS INDEX #109, 137.84 40 6812 < INCLUDING THE A.D.A. (TRUNCATED DOMES PER -.... .. .... EXISTING- --- EXISTING D.O.T. INDEX #304.) FIRE HYDRANT PEDESTRIAN GULF TO BAY (SR 601 _ - _ _ RAMP _ 2.ANY NEW OR REPLACED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON(S) CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE (100' R/W) EXISTING _ GRATE_ RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE A MINIMUM 6" THICK _ _ -- - -- -' ---? INLET r r _ - -----' Yi FIBROUS CONCRETE, AND A MINIMUM 3000 PSI - WITH 6" X 6" / 10 X 10 W.W.M. [SIDEWALKS - - SHALL NOT TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THIS - -- - - -y APRON AREA(S)]. REFER TO CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND ...... .................. ... ................. ........... .- ............ _...... _ . ..... - - - -- --- - -- STANDARDS INDEX #103. 0 0 0 o? o=o z _v `s a m 0 U < ° F suoisinay u 0 ril I?? II Z H J N Z V a 00 J a m u J =o CD O M u. N W cn Lu V 0 N U U 0 0 S Ao °noa` OyLL:v N tjy^ u u -Va Z a J a W I- ZE U Wr,Q C) Hw w F a F a F i SHEET No. 3 SITE STORMWATER TREATMENT 6" VERTICAL SWALE CURBING 15' PARKING 2 If 11 4 4 WHEEL i 1 ?I ... STOP ] .L. .. T ( J GRASS R/W STRIP If u (N TS) SECTION A-A PROPOSED STORMWATER SWALE STORMWATER CALCULATIONS SHELLY 13' 2' ST 50' 100' SCALE: 1" = 50' SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL zz f ?, ll??ll APPROXIMATE R%W une 1' DEEP WATER QUALITY TREATMENT SWALE FOR SHELLY ST NEW PARKING AREA ONLY. (60' R/W) SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 A - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------? - - - - - - ---- - - ---- 4 N89'42 21 W 294.50' - - - _ T--' - -..._ ? 'ATO Z AUTO CARE z ` (f) ( x F (I 11N o J w H m of G_ Uo U V \ h- W W W v I I , t ml LJ o? of -- .: 04 C3. w 04 N ?- - ----- N I J' C}13TI1! [ o FN -;AL HE AIL SHOPS 10 w I U W ?\ N j ENTERPRISE I o X2416 #2. 420: 2 2 y2424 t 26 : w RENT A GAR : Z ? I I ? I Uo # E P _ . g;GN F.. AN -Fi LOT LINE 44.57 LOT LINE 100' _ _ LOT LINE 150' - - - ] 589'40'31 E 294.58' THE PROPOSED STRRMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT SWALE IS DESIGNED TO TREAT THE FIRST 1/2 INCH RUNOFF FROM THE SHADED PRKING AREA TO BE RESURFACED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT: PARKING AREA = 5,060 SF TREATMENT VOLUME = (0.5 INCHES / 12 INCHES PER FT) ' 5,060 SF TREATMENT VOLUME = 211 CF OF STORAGE REQUIRED NO ATTENUATION VOLUME IS REQUIRED SINCE THE IMPERVIOUS AREA OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE REDUCED BASED ON THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. PROPOSED SWALE CAPACITY: VOLUME = ) 818 SF(TOP) + 0 SF (BOT) / 2 " 1' DEEP = 409 CF GRADING LEGEND ELEVATION EL TYPICAL TYP CLEANOUT CO INVERT ELEVATION IE HANDICAP HC EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION -0 DRAINAGE INLET MITERED END SECTION D PROPOSED SWALE STORMWATER FLOW EXISTING SWALE STORMWATER FLOW PROPOSED VALLEY FLOW f- C SURFACE STORMWATER FLOW nn 4 DIRECTION OF STORM WATER FLOW STORM DRAIN SO HELICALLY CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE HCAP ELLIPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ERCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RCP POLY VINYL CHLORIDE PIPE PVC FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FFE SIDEWALK S/W STORM SEWER STRUCTURE NUMBER 5-50 EROSION CONTROL PROPOSED HIGH POINT ---- GULF TO BAY (SR 60) (100' R/W) U nw ..............-- CG .?. o. H O N N a? 3 < U m m ? o w Z a J a W C7 a z a O O Z a L7 Z D a C7 Z a a Fw W ''a F ? H SHEET No. s a o F z ? ? -- z a` ?- I -WHICLE SERVICE --' SOUTH ABUTTING , ' ENTERPRISE RENT a a a < aG ' i - SOUTH ABUTTING iWVEFIICLE PARJT BOOTH ENT' DOOR 1 A CAR BUILDING _ s ) ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR BUILDING ) 8 o F ° v :. l S t 30 NT INSTALL NEW WINDOW SHUT E RS It ' ? ? tsuoislnaa U 0 w . +f y TENANT WALL SIGN ? ? _ ?? • ? n 4? ?. ii . TEN r ? of is - ? f 5 • n k AN , r .y ? J 4 ? ^-?? ? ? i>Y;: ?Ft??'"h, _aq // • , a . X1 o ENTIRE-FACE OF SUID" J TO BE PRESSURE WASHED A AND CLEATED BY OWNER k'V r <fi v p (> _ a r CO) Z = ? O p un EU U SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION WEST BUILDING ELEVATION V C .7U?Ua a a ? - - . - .:.EXISTING ARCHITECTURAL ,. . - FEATURE AT ROOF LINE 1B ' ... ... REMAIN _. 30 SF TENANT WALL SIGN .. ', „? ,.`.., " : ?. , - - .. .:, . .. .. (SOUTH FACE OF BLDG) _ ENTIRE FACE OF BUILDING .' TO BE PRESSURE WASHED -__....._...,.F._..., AND CLEANED BY OWNER a m 3 W T NTIRE FACE OF BUILDING TO BE PRESSURE WASHED - VEHICLE PAINT BOOTH EXIT DOOR LL Z AND CLEANED BY OWNER INSTALL NEW WINDOW SHUTTERS (? Q W `.p LL. ?. V INSTALL NEW WINDOW SHUTTERS ( L! !! cv) W N D - - - - ti - - - - - - - - - - .._ ,. .. VEHICLE SERVICE co Lu PROPOSED ENTRY DOORS " PARKING Ek1F 600R ? U ?'-- --- -PROPOSER ENTRY DOOR" KILMER AVE TO BE UNDER AWNING ' F" ? - ' , +. ?•_ WALK PAVEMENT AREA TO BED WITH 9 REMOVED FOR PROPOSED . ,,,. . PROPOSED REAR DO OR LANDSCAPING IN THIS ARE V W TO BE UNDER A'O N / _ A •, Y f f :. WITH 9 WALK 'G t - i. DETERIORATED PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED AND OVERLAYED ALL A TO 2 AUTO CARE SHELLEY STREET CARS TO BE REMOVED REAR PARKING AREA TO BE FENCED UPON OCCUPANCY BY AND LANDSCAPED MOM VIEW OF TENANT 51NC1E FAMILY RESIOEN7IAL HOMES { II 1 J G? ' , _ ,' °`?' ' u '!? 'l?• "? ? V r?-, W ? -•-'-- w--..•?-.-.. I 1 { r u .4-.c. r£-f'w. ?'.`M _ - ._ -..1+? Y..? ?'N r?2?. fr i`'l',?.-` t ... 'y M F'' - P H W H , vT NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION EAST BUILDING ELEVATION SHEE T No. 5 GENERAL LANDSCAPE N OTES APPROXIMATE R/W LINE 1' DEEP WATER QUALITY I. All Plant materi shall be Florida dl or better andrntated to hghat nursery standards. narasd,a7te TREATMENT SWALE FOR EW PARKING AREA ONLY SHELLY ST N h2 ,e 2, All pu5 d 5 11bb p85tndasaa5e wntn rgrown uPt aS noted . pan. 3. Alpas'5andtreesshellhaue straight tmnki thnotmSts r defemue&-ten5Gw motGn th . SIDE SLOPES TO BE 4:1 (80 R/W) . . goro e Y Mulch Shall be 100%Pme Dark, installed b, a wnmum Juiciness of 2'. 5. Sod shall be 95%weed free 5t. Aagustne flarztaw,,rcralled th tghtjoints, A 6. A" chin nvne shall be held cheded by the Landscape Contractor prior to mnsur-ton with any ll JA POM rcre .c' eIrtll t o the ndsca tcc 7. All matenah shall be n sPenhed can the runs, Ifmgenals, labor cnrctallatno tedhnques do lot adhere me UlJ-p` Mchttetw th spatted materials and nebllatgn '--' 'F fican x 11 bereje ua ` . " - --' 9 a e nd a e the tnW CO 3 d ? / _ - t i 8 No eubsttatens of coals inal hann to the our c rawug5 or specM1Catwns Shull be nade. All requred permits are to be pronded by tsc rotall oo contractor unless spaofealy stated othem-, clcatws the S N89'42'21 W 294.50 L 30_ ? 1 I - - ---' M F . o contra<tvden:Iwtonsgns5nallot5cA-dontheproject. m . Convxto, shallbe rnponsiNs for all te-I as I-ord-bed on the plan and cheaters. 2 All prepo5ed la dscape and 5ed areas to+ta oily tad a weeds shall be treated in Roundj per 7 j . • ly t r 1 =01 a nuf are s twns. :u- p . 1 `p landscapce Con Contrtactor shAl pramde all necessary site preparation reau«dto ready the site for planting as A TO Z *[ ?, I - ? h0J A ® r? 200 14 The landscape CAmrador 5halI-arty a.'d gwrxltee all materials and L*o, for a period e190 days for '? Y I V W • LAM bs and grondwr. Alms and tree. Warranty OM grates podul begin upon date of ompio idn. AUTO 5 15. Al rcr-andrer replacement shall be made by the landscape Contractor within 10 awbq day, u pon t M1 b f d l b h th 1 In ICB L j w 1 7 O: CARE Uw I IJA PJ I e totes e a:mer an ro ca on o any o y t reprneolatme. eir IG. Allque5t-rcgarong the tndsope Hans and 5pecM1catwe shall be directed to the Landscape Architect at (727) 7872840. 0 4 C 4 Q ZO L' M 75 FERTILIZATION 1 N I TJN k : d J O w > 100 1 JF- - hrubs and Trees 9 o } . ' y Q Ion U O LMG laA N All van and shrubs shall be heRlved mth'Aynf- 20-15-5 plant rig tbkt at time of plarrt og and pmor to rstall,t- of lant t backf fl Tablet shall be thced uruF J t d t t b ll d th N t b t V PA , ; w I U v\ IU 5 p p p - y aroun he roo a a ween u ep a e e the riddle and b ttom of the root ball l R A W 32 ) b 1 pp rabon ate 20 ,? t11B v ^ I Gallon Cent 1 21 g m tablet , u--- SGallm Cort 3 2J grin tablet O _ _... _ .... _ _...-- 20 ',. ? i x: 3,1 1 # 7 Gallon Container: 4 -21 qrail ifen 3 tablets per et each 112 Wiper of trunk I V • . : 71 { G A d 50 30 roun cover reas All lcl areas slWl receive fs bluaton wdh'Oanioecte tune release fc'a1re, per marufact-i`5 LMG II 5penhcaGans. OA L G ZFO m Z q an rraaenu.,. 3 O1 J H15 12 sanuri",n. ' I ha 20' I1- 1 N ? °1 0? - ? 1 m.h m-<n C; ? m ro: a ? T W'' . v a" i 55 O Ld N x- w u y?w>:.re i N z ange xn Epo+r td ? . . ... .. _ .... . mys,x ? 1 N 8 2 N °. Q W ° LL I Y L O TREE PLANTING DETAIL TREE PROTECTION DETAIL n _ V / m RE All SHOPS ; ` . E IS _ N " U w U m w Zfn t-XIST'•';1 R= IN R n -- Q H w IN 9OC wI U Q U Q I ? 1 o a f ENTERPRISE °' kr,h„a as ?h wa . ? O ttl M d v U Q 74:6 '242 1 he 212 4 PC-,L A O , 0 w RENT A•CAR o Z - ma N ?? 5HRUB PLANTING DETAIL C) C) - ----_ 2 N ,' A .4'.,1. ii as I I 1 I z Plant Materla15 Schedule v C a, h J Quantity Code Botamcal Name Common Name 5pecfiation 5pacm3 tab 1= V C IGN I 3 46 t115 Hibiscus spp. Hiblsas 3 gal 24" x 24" 30" o.c. ' 0 N b ;h IV ! 7 ICB Ilex comuta burfordo Burford Holly 3 gal 24 x 24" 30' o... CL AN R E LO LINE 44.57 LOT LINE 100 T ' ' 150' LOT LIN II S Yellow 200 LAM hnatnespp. Crape Myrtle 1 al, 12'ht x 12'1. 18'o.. - 9 L L I Lagerstroemla hndica Cra crape Myrtle a ht x 5 sp 2.5' al. " r " 4Q J. 0 ... .?..._.. , 45 LMM LinopeMusao Aztec Grass I gal., 12 z 12 ht 5F- 180.c. ............ S89'40'31"E 294 58' r 130 LMG Uno a Masan Gant too a a1., 12' ht. x 12' s n. o c p p e vr' x . O .......... . _ l ........... •a.- - . . 125 JP Jun penis parson Parsons Juniper 3 gal 12' ht z 18" spr. 330'o.' 50 POM Podoarpus slap. Podoarpus 3 gal 24' ht x 24" spr. 30' o.'. C 39 RI Raph olep s M ca Indian hawthorn 3 gal. 18" ht z 18 spr. 30' o.c. Q t W TJV Trachelospermum3asmmohdhe5 Var. Confederate Jasmine 3 gal., 18' ht. x 18' epr. 30' e.c. 20 TJN Trachelospermum a5iaticum Dwarf Confederate Jasmine I gal., 6' ht. x 12'5pr. 18' o,c NPLrrr-IGNASS0c- am GULF TO BAY (SR 60) 7 DA Ulmu5alat. Elm I2'ht.x4'5pr,2.5"cal. P l 8 C " " , LANDSCAPE ardboard ZFU Zamia furfuraoa a m 7 gal., 30 x 30 36' o.c. ARCHITECTS (100' R/W) 1666 Tansy Dd e . ...... .... .... .... .... i Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 Phone 111111-1141 -0 ,_....... ...._.- .. ..... ......--.... ..- ........ ... -_ '? t F. 717765 01 Iandnapc Archtmure .. ..... ............ ...... ... .. . ..? ?.__ 0 25' 50' 100' g Site Planning Cono-aw Administration JOB NO. 25077 Scale 1" = 50-0" SHEET L - I l u? V k NEZZANINE SCALE: 3/1(,,= 1'_0„ PHILIPPI ASSOCIATE?s, P.A. architecture/ urban design 3631 FOURTH STREET N., SUITE 230, ST.PETERSBURG, FL 33104 r-71 DI STOl -- ---COVERED ENTRY' I -WOULD REQUIRE VARIANCE N.I.C. I lll:i-llIIF.DI,SP1AYl'I III III EXISTING ELECTRIC PANEL AREA 1_8ff in r Ln i ir 1 A I I -_,I I II I I jiI / I C _--I I ?I I II -AMW it• I' II ROOM ( I II II I II n n n r n r' , .f II II II II II I I 11 I? 1 ' I II II i U I II I 13f_?fl off 131_,?t, ? Ist f=LfR PLAN SCALE: 3/1(= I'-C' PHILIPPI ASSOCIATES, P_A architecture/ urban design 3631 FOURTH STREET N., SUITE 230, ST.PETERSBURG, FL 33104 c-C)t?) i FLD2005-07075 2430 GULF TO BAY BLVD Date Received: 07/28/2005 DC CUSTOMS ORIGINAL ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 290B PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS 006 wr, ! .f S U 5 CLW CoverSheet Scott Lincoln, PE President IVIL ? ? Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc. 1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 E-Mail: slincoln@LACivil.com