The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-02021 (2)?z SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ORIGI ` SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $1,205.00 CASE #:_t- DATE ?- DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: AL SOUTH: WEST: EAST: ' r NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) PHONE NUMBER: 708-785-0264 MAY 12 2005, FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT. APPLICATION,'.-,-, Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 10-10-2003) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- use additional sheets as necessary A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section APPLICANT NAME: Lucca Development, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 9011 S. Natoma Ave., Oak Lawn, IL 60453 E-MAIL ADDRESS: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY.OWNER(S): FAX NUMBER: Co FEB 2 4 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Americana Gulf Motels Ltd., Lucca Development LLC, Tomasz & Stella Wilk, US - Eurotrade Inc. . (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME(S): Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA MAILING ADDRESS: Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 E-MAIL ADDRESS: keith @ keittuayac.com CELL NUMBER: PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 ORIGI . NA B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) rv??-1At?a ?i~ STREET ADDRESS of subject site:325 S. Gulfview Blvd., 326 ., 345 Coronado Dr., 347-053 Coronado Dr., 346 Hamden Dr. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Survey (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: 61,212.39 SF (1.41 acres) + 40,561.13 SF (0.93 acres) + 1,381.59 SF (0.03 acres) =103,155.11 SF (2.37 acres) (acres, square feet) . PROPOSED USE AND. WON. muMamily condominium units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attachment A parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of Dana 1 of 7 - Plavihin rlavalnnmant Cnnlir Finn - (`.mmnrahan hm Infill Parlawainmmnnf Drni-4 Gifu of (?laanunfar r)EVE THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT LOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES X NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF.OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A) 14 Provide complete responses to the six(6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved„ in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties.inr which it is located. _ See Attachment B for answers to 1-6 MAY 12 2005 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land_ and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. FEB 2 4 2005 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. CITY OF CLEARWAIER 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. r e Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, interr and development standards. See attachment C for answers 1-10 Dona 9 of 7 - Mavihla rlmminnmanf Cnnlirofinn _ rtmmnrahancinm Infill PaAavalnnmant Drni-f- (':ifv of filaarAofar _ 73? Z?. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site withahe improvements.). 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. ORIGIN 4. The uses or mbr of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. PE EIVEU 17A 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill feWeI4AnPr9JLt are not otherW available in the City of Clearwater. RwAlAitAl/° n[DADTAAiGAI'ti' MY OF CLEARWATER 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. - - - • 1 MAY 19. 2,005 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community, character_ of tl immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ' L 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. Donn Z of 7 _ Flavihla r'lavainnmanf Onnlinofinn _ r:mmnrahanaiva Infill Railavalnnmanf orniorf_ r.irv of r.Iaanuafar A se °„F : r S f 1- ?- f err ?;' E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQWREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) .. W SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) One original and 14 copies; L. !" a TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent she, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, r° including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (i.e. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accord'ance` with accepted traffi engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to thUR rkingstand r re approved; &)T 1 IN/ . GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ?..F ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided) ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24". x 361:- RECEIVED ' All dimensions; ' North arrow; - Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _ L,-" Location map; '# _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; A eta' _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; PLANNING ®EPtiRYM`?V ? V, Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; •? _ Include floor plates on multi-story buildings; ? OF CLEARWAIER i All required setbacks; _ w?All existing and proposed points of access; i.,? All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _ t Location of all public and private easements; _ t . Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas . and water lines; (" Note: Per Section 3-911, all utilities shall be located/relocated underground) All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(Dxi) and Index #701); _ ^. Location of all landscape material; _ ?. Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; Location of all onsite and offske storm-water management facilities; ^ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and ORIGINAL Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabular form: V/ ./Land area in square feet and acres; _ v.- Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 11-1--Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; " Size and species of all landscape material; ' '- NZO Official records book.and page numbers of all existing utility easement; 1 _•,5: ilding and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and *71;* Floor area ratio (FA.R.) for all nonresidential uses A ''' FO DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: j d AY 2? One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; , Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; _ ks 'Afopen space areas; I'll Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; 4 Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees Perna d of 7 - mavihlo rlowalnnmanf Onnlirnfinn _ (^.mmnrahanenia lnfill Qadaual--ant Drniorf_ (:ih, of r:la?nu?far y: i ? r G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Sect" J°U LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; ` 1/ Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; _ Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantfies of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulchi protective measures; 1111110k no Amok Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expre UWF!t%D percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes ?100C FEg 2 L J REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (81/2 X 11), in color. rr ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications) Pi?.1N14I dG D?E.?PA?R?iM El COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable +? ?''rfi T OF H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) GRIGINAL STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; C f .. Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ORt NAt Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; + Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required In the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials ?± REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 34 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, If possible) as required CA, SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section ? ) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; f remain. hs A`nd dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they vxilL or to ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. Dana y of 7 - Pavihla Ilaualnnmant Cnnlirafinn - (`.mmnrahanenia Infill Darlavalnnmanf Drniar4 ( %s of (:laanmafar K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Sew-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) /'JO O Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property A.D. 20,E t?-- by described in this Application. who ersonally kno has produced as identification. of property owner or representative Notary public, 6J? My commission expires: Allot Gina Boivin Co 338 on ##DD217 ..oQ Expires: May 29, 2007 SIN FLOP" Bonded Thru 11-1 Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. RECEIVED FFg 2 4 2005 PLANNING DEPARIMENT CITY O ORIGINAL Pana R of 7 - Flavihla r)-ainnmanf Gnnlirafinn - f ;mmnrahanenie Infill F ad-lalnnmanf Prniaf4 f :ilv of lNaa tar M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE A N r Americana Gulf Motels Ltd., Lucca Development LLC, Tomasz & Stella Wilk, US - Eurotrade, Inc. (Names of ALL property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. .That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 325 S. Gulfview Blvd., 326 Coronado Dr., 345 Coronado Dr„ 347-353 Coronado Dr., 346 Hamden Dr. 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 83 Unit multifamily condominium project 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (doesido) appoint: Keith E Tayac, P E , RLA as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant aoknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and; ome . Prope er r0non n Property Owner F8 2 005 Property Owner PLMNING DEPqMEW . FA RIA. CRY 0 F Property Owner ,s - I ORIGINAL STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned b the laws of the State of Florida, on this f 9 4? day of personally appeared -Fta e" kP" who having been first duly Mom Deposes a says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: Gina Boivin Notary Public Commission #DD217338 Ex i M 29 p res: ay , 2007 :9'.... •'PP: Bonded Thru Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. S:Oanning DepartmentlApplication Fomuldevelopment revie.vAComprehensive infi/l redevelopment project application 10-10-2003.doc M. 'AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE A Americana Gulf Motels Ltd., Lucca Development LLC, Tomasz & Stella Wilk, US - Eurotrade, Inc. (Names of ALL property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. -That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 325 S. Gultview Blvd., 326 Coronado Dr., 345 Coronado Dr., 347-353 Coronado Dr., 346 Hamden Dr. 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) QECEWED 93 Unit multi-family condominium project ???]]] FFR 2.4 2005 DEPARIMEW 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (doestdo) appoint: Ke' as (hWtheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property r r Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner f STATE OF FLORIDA, ^ COUNTY OF PINELLAS" Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, o this day of AOaj personally appeared ?S? GSA kI who having been first duty swom Deposes an says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: - V1 CheriA Davis w MYCOMMISSION# DD045673 EXPIRES ` lu 29, 2005 Notary Public Ptnt ° ' BONDED TMRUTROYFAININSURANCF,INC S1planning Departmentl4pplication Formsldevelopment revieMComprehensive infill redevelopment project application 10-10-2003.doc 2006-Jan-28 15:17 From-FELDMAN ROB* & 8417615565 0323 P.003/003 . F-832 Americana Gulf Motels Limited Partnership a Florida Limited Partnership By: Americana East Investments, Inc. a Florida Corporation - General Partner By. ttz t t. A- , a Clara Boldog - Pr siden Clara BoldQ indly ua11y Dorothy Idog, in 'v dually COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2005, by Clara Boldog, as President of Americana East Investments, Inc. a Florida Corporation, as General Partner of American Gulf Motels Limited Partnership, a Florida Limited Partnership, on behalf of the Partnership; Clara Boldog Individually, and Dorothy Boldog, individually, who are personally known tome or produced as identification: ¢c? NOTARY PU13LIC SIGN: ?-- PR1NT: i ?n a t 2? cZIA i In i MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: - p `- ?d ORIGINAL RECEINED FF9 2 4 2005 PLANNING IDEPARiMENT c11V OF CLEARWAIR K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Sft-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted In the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. 1 C.?'? T?"S! 62? Signature of property o Ter or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS a Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of J A.D. 20 0 to me and/or by MRS a QS?'C? W?\K. who is personally known has produced as Cheri A Davis . No ry public, _*: *= ION # DD045673 Wff My commission expires:} ?.' July. 29, 2005 qj BONDED THRU TROY FAIN WM INC KING ?EPAR?A. a ?F i?l?WR? ORIGINAL Penn R of 7 - Pavihla r)avalnnmanf Onnli-finn - f:mmnrahanaiva Infill Rarlavalnnmanf Prnianf_ r`.ily of fNaan far r • AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) I 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) CITY OF CLF.ARWATER 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Property COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared -'-AnmjetA b noel who having been first duly sworn Deposes,eAd that he/she fully understands the contents of th"fffidavit that he/she signed. A My Commission Expires: Gina Boivin e : Commission #DD217338 Expires: May 29, 2007 Public Atlantic S:\Planning DepartmenAApplication Forms\development revieMflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 ATTACHMENT A MARRABEEEA DESCRPTIONS OF PROJECT &REQUESTS ORIGINAL 1. General Proiect Description The project consists of three contiguous parcels referred to as parcels A, B & C within this submittal package. Parcel A is 1.41 acres and is located on South Gulfvew Blvd. The existing overnight accommodations will be removed and replaced with a 91 unit condominium building 148'-0" high from FEMA to roof mid-point. Parcel B is 0.93 acres and is located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, on the north side of 5th Street. The existing overnight accommodations and condominium units will be removed and replaced with a 10 unit condominium building 50'7-0" high from FEMA to roof mid- point. Parcel C is 0.03 acres and is located bay-front along Hamden Drive. It will remain in it's current undeveloped state and provide a waterfront view for parcel B. 2. Transfer of Density A transfer of density will be part of this submittal from a 0.45 acre parcel located on the south side of 5th Street, between Hamden Drive and Coronado Drive. Based on the acreage 18 overnight accommodations will be transferred from the site to the project. The existing development will be removed and grassed to provide open space across the street from Parcel B 3. Termination of Non-Conformity As part of this application, the applicant is requesting a termination of non-conformity for both the project site (Parcels A, B & C). Note 1 The applicant, through a related company, is the contractual owner of the donor site. Note 2: There will be a unity of title recorded for all the property that is the subject of this application (Does not include the "donor site). The "Receiving and Donor site is either owned by or is contracted by the applicant (there are numerous parcels assembled). Currently the property that is the subject of this application contains a total of 2.37 acres and is legally non-conforming as follows. Comp Plan Allowed Existing 93 overnight accommodation units (hotel) 113 (hotel) 3 condominium units (existing) 3 (condos) The "Donor Site" contains 0.45 acres and contains 20 overnight accommodation legally., non-conforming units. f, MAY 12 2005 • 1? Using the maximum number of units permitted by the comp plan, 18 hotel units are the maximum that may be transferred onto the project that is the subject of this application (93 x 20% = 18.6). After termination of the project site non-conformity and the transfer of 18 units from the "Sending Site" to the "Receiving Site," the sending site will retain 2 remaining units from the "Sending Site" for use by the developer for the future development of the property. 4. Building Height Increase Parcel A will include a maximum building height of 148'-0" above FEMA. Parcel B will include a maximum building height of 50'-0" above FEMA. 5. Setbacks Reductions Parcel B Front: 0'-0" to east pavement and planters Reduction in sight visibility triangles at entrances ORIGINAL MAY 12 2005 0 0 EXHIBIT B MARRABELLA GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed condominium building on parcel A, and B will be consistent with the other proposed new beach front development scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of surrounding properties. The proposed increased building height of 148'-0" on parcel A is consistent with other requests along the beach. The proposed parking will be all within an enclosed garage with architectural treatments designed not to look like a parking garage, and maintain the character of Beach by Design. The Mediterranean architectural style includes barrel tile roof elements and significant architectural relief. The building scale, bulk and coverage are consistent with the zoning code with only one minor setback reduction request to the west face of the building. The proposed building height of 50'-0" on parcel B provides an adequate step-down in building height to maintain view corridors from the beachfront development. The proposed resort will maintain the character of Clearwater Beach as a hotel/condominium tourist destination and does not deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District. The density and scale is in harmony with the Beach by Design standards and represents a full service hotel with retail and other accessory amenity uses. The building scale, bulk and coverage are consistent with the zoning code with only one pavement setback reduction request to include raised planters and architectural paving. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The value of property depends on the highest and best use improvements on the site and the market factors of supply and demand. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by development of the Resort. The creation of condominium units with a fully enclosed parking garage will not only bring full time residents to the beach, but also promote the redevelopment of existing older properties for enhancement of the entire beachfront. t MAY 1 L i4pi ORIGINAL 0 0 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The project includes the consolidation and minimization of vehicular driveways into the two developed parcels. The driveway locations will be fully signed and stripped and sidewalks constructed to promote safe pedestrian traffic. The existing condition of the projects include uncontrolled access from the public rights of way and direct backout of parked cars into the traveled lanes without pedestrian sidewalks. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Several existing driveways will be closed and reconstructed into controlled access into the proposed parking garages. The proposed density of the development does not significantly increase peak hour or daily traffic counts, and was determined not to need a traffic study. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The project is located within the Tourist district and is required to meet Beach by Design criteria. The project preserves full time residences and significantly enhances the availability. The character of the project will far exceed existing design standards along the Beach and actually enhance the overall character of the south beach area with Mediterranean architecture. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The project will not have retail, restaurant or other public operations that may have adverse hours of operations or noise issues. MAY 7.2 2p?5 ORIGINAL • EXHIBIT C MARRABELLA COMPREHENSIVE INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA The following responses provide justification for this Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, consistent with the City of Clearwater Land Development Code. 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviation from the use, intensity and development standards. The requested setback deviations are limited to only the planters and architectural pavement along the east front setback of parcel B. The height increase to 148'-0" on parcel A allows for the inclusion of a fully enclosed parking garage along with the residential units allowed. Without the height increase the fully enclosed parking garage and allowable units will not fit within the setback limitations. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The proposed quality of the amenities and luxury residences with interior elevators and balconies on both sides will greatly enhance the value of abutting properties. The existing properties are older outdated motel and apartment properties which will experience a substantial increase in fair market value due to the new construction of luxury units. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted In the City of Clearwater. Residences and parking are permitted in the tourist district of the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The tourist district allows the hotel residences and is compatible with adjacent hotel properties and residences, and the future land use plan. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater The applicant currently owns a portion of the proposed project site and has minimized the requested variances to height and minimal setback reductions. The height request along the beach would be applicable to other adjacent site and is consistent with other recent requests. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The current surrounding immediate vicinity consists of older motels and other associated commercial businesses that are outdated. The proposed development upgrades the parcel to a high-end condominium package. This proposal will significantly_ _ upgrade the appearance and use of the area. The setbacks from Gulfview, Coronado and Hamden plus the removal of on-street parking (direct backout) will substantially improve the vicinity and-' ORIGINAL MAY 12 2005 geneial streetscape. The ad*n of fountains, foundation land0ping and arcade/building recess also upgrades the area. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The form of the building, stepped and tiered, along with accent and focal point elements including classic gables, recessed balconies, 2 and 3 story columns and flowing roof lines enhances community character. The building form relates to the neighboring projects and addresses positively its position along Beach Walk, with it's courtyard effects and prominence on the front along the beach as an important resort project. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. All off-street parking is removed, courtyards on several levels and fountain/plazas are provided. The building is setback 25 feet on Gulfview and 15 feet on all other sides. The height of the parcel A building is 148'-0" to 100'-0", with stepping rooflines and veranda. These elements add to the recessed balcony/arcade elements of the desired tropical classical architecture of the vicinity. As an elegant shape and detail, the building enhances greatly the character of the vicinity. In addition, great effort was used to enhance the pedestrian character of the building, including scale as it meets the ground plane. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. NIA, the project exceeds parking requirements 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. A. Height portions of any structure which exceeds one hundred feet (100) are spaced at least one hundred feet apart. All portions over 150' are 100' or more away from any other building or portion above 100'. B. Between 42 feet and 100 feet the floor plate will be no greater than 25, 000 square feet. The 42' to 100' floor plate is 19,292 SF, which is less than 25,000 SF. C. Between 100 feet and 150 feet the floor plate will be no greater than 10, 000 square feet. The 100' to 150' floor plate is 10,663 SF to 6,798 SF, averaging 8,300 SF which is less than 10,000 SF. - Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings: ,_?/ ORIGINAL "QY 121005 I . Buildings with a footprint of ter than 5, 000 square feet or a s dimension of greater than one hundred (100) square fee ill be constructed so that no morvan two (2) of the three (3) building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. For this purpose equal in length means that the two lengths vary by less than forty-percent (40966) of the shorter of the two (2) lengths. The horizontal plane measurements relate to the footprint of the building. Lengths vary many times to form a shape that respects beach views but also gives a shape that is pleasant and interesting from a distance, i.e. causeway and Gulfview. The shape also reduces bulk. 2. No plane of a building may continued uninterrupted for greater than one hundred linear feet. For the purpose of this standard, Interrupted means an offset of greater than 5 feet. No portion, line or facade exceeds 100' without significant shape change or recess. Lengths vary many times to form a shape that respects beach views but also gives a shape that is pleasant and interesting from a distance, i.e. causeway and Gulfview. The shape also reduces bulk. 3. At least sixty-percent (60966) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration, For the purpose of this standard an elevation is that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development. At least 72% windows and architectural details are provided, well in excess of the required 60%. 4. No more than sixty-percent (6096) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above one story will be occupied by a building. For the purpose of this standard, theoretical maximum building volume is the maximum permitted building volume that could be theoretically occupied by a building and occupied by a building includes any portion of the maximum possible building envelope that is not visible front a public street. The building meets the 60% maximum with an envelope of 36%. 5. The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The building facade comes close to the Gulfview Right of Way to provide street framing and mass for the pedestrian and the courtyard. The Coronado facade is recessed and stepped to give space and openness for the vehicular movements on this side. The buildings relate well to the dimensions of the property and aspects of adjacent uses. The courtyard effect on Gulfview encourages pedestrian and cafe quality along the Beach Walk. 6. Buildings may be designed for a "vertical or horizontal mix of permitted uses. The project includes and recreational amenities. D. Setbacks and Stepbacks 1. Right- of-ways The area between the building should be sufficiently wide to ORIGINAL 2005 ?AY! 2 1.1 ) and the right-of way (edge of pavement as existing and planned) create a pedestrian-friendly environment. The distances from structures to the edge of the -t--of way should be: (1) fifteen fe&57 along arterials; and (2) twelve feet (12) along local stre s. The setback from the proposed buildings meets or exceeds 15 feet to the property line. 2. Stepbacks For buildings Over three stories (42 feet) in height, portions above 42 feet should be set back at least one floor for every two feet of additional height. Architectural details that create a "human scale" may be substituted for side and rear stepbacks. The required stepbacks are provided and identified on the enclosed architectural plans. E. Lot Coverage and Open Space At least twenty-Five percent (2596") of each parcel proposed for development should be maintained as open landscape or qualifying hardscape. Open landscape or qualifying hardscape means "landscaped areas, plazas and other areas covered with pavers or other decorative features, but does not include off-street parking areas or roadways. The project area is 103,155.11 SF with open space totaling 32,271.57 SF or 31%, which exceeds the required 25%. F Street-Level Facades (1) At least sixty percent (60916") of the street level facades of buildings used for nonresidential purposes, which abut a public street, will be transparent 1,4AY 12 2005 The enclosed architectural plans show the transparent street levels. (3) Building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and easily identified. The building entrances are framed by architectural fagade features to clearly identify where they are located. The pedestrian entrances are also accessed from upgraded architectural pavers areas surrounded by raised planters, and surface planting beds. G. Parking Areas Entrances to parking areas should be clearly marked in order to avoid confusion When a parking garage abuts a public road or other public places, it will be designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of access or egress. The entrances to the parking garages will include adequate signage to avoid confusion, but will be architecturally treated, as shown in the enclosed elevations, to not be readily apparent except at points of access and egress. H. Signage A complete signage program will be submitted for approval at a later date. J. Sidewalks ORIGINAL Sidewalks along arterials andktail streets should be at least tent (10) in width. All sidewalks along arterials and retail stre will be landscaped with palm tree aced to a maximum of thirty five feet (35) on centers, with "clear gray" of not less than eight feet (8). Portions of the required sidewalks may be improved for non-pedestrian purposes including outdoor dining and landscape material provided that movement of pedestrians is not obstructed, and non- pedestrian improvements and uses are located on the street side of the sidewalk Distinctive paving patterns should be used to separate permanent sidewalk cafe improvements from the pedestrian space on the sidewalk The proposed surrounding sidewalks are currently shown to match the existing sidewalk width to provide access around the proposed development. The access sidewalks exceed 10' in width and are upgraded architectural pavers. The building facades are enhanced with several palms, understory trees and shrub vegetation. MAY 12 2055 ORIGINAL 34v/ .? : CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH (MYRTLE AVENUE, 211dFLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 APPLICANT AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPLICANT'S NAME MAILING ADDRESS : PHONE NUMBER : 7G?3 7SS °?JZG??' FAX NUMBER : AGENT NAME : MAILING ADDRES PHONE NUMBER: 7Z. / - 7/15 FAX NUMBER : ITi 7-?J7'- / P7t'J SITE TO WHICH THE TDR WILL :BE TRANSFERRED (receiver site): PROPERTY OWNER : /? T? S/ MAILING ADDRESS : PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER : LEGAL DESCRIPTION: X47 (IF IN METES AND BOUNDS, ATTACHA SEPARATE SHEET) STREET ADDRESS: M utr PARCEL NUMBER : ZONING DISTRICT: s SIZE OF SITE: ICES: 155: tl S? CURRENT USE OF THE n PROPERTY: I I ?7 L4U rk (# OF HOTEL ROOMS, DWELLING UNITS, COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA, VACANT) HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE ALLOCATED TO THIS SITE? HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE BEING' TRANSFERRED? HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PREVIOUSLY BEEN TRANSFERRED TO OR FROM THIS PROPERTY? YES X NO IF YES, HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS HAVE BEEN TRANSFERRED? IS A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? -X'- YES _ NO IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: _I ??l'? uRtr"N N A L I. • a ORIGINAL SITE FROM WHICH THE TDR WILL BE TRANSFERRED (sender site): PROPERTY OWNER : r MAILING ADDRESS : 40I ??JJ t?I ?11f? "i PHONE NUMBER : 766 -786 -- 6Z,/ FAX NUMBER : LEGAL DESCRIPTION : (IF IN METES AND BOUNDS, ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET) STREET ADDRESS : PARCEL NUMBER: ZONING DISTRICT: •-r Z 7- 104) n lot) i c3 -4: ,_, SIZE OF SITE : f'T i t r` A C- SIVE CURRENT USE OF THE r 1 e f?t01 grr- f1G PROPERTY : v7 Li VC-01 -S (# OF HOTEL ROOMS, DWELLING NITS, COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA, VACANT) ?I A?D_3 20(}05 HOW yf? NDYDEVEL Pt?MEjJT RIGHT A LL ?O THIS SITE? PLANNING D HOW JN_A bDEVEL PM_F?NT RIGI TARE ?G TRANSFERRED? C ITV ITT/ OF 4LI HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PREVIOUSLY BEEN TRANSFERRED TO OR FROM THIS PROPERTY? YES JP?- NO TH FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION: COPY OF THE WARRANTY DEED OF OWNERSHIP OR CONTRACT TO PURCHASE THE RECEIVER SITE; STATEMENT THAT THE DEED OF TRANSFER WILL BE RECORDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. STATEMENT THAT THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS REFLECTED IN THE INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE HAVE NOT BEEN CONVEYED TO ANOTHER PERSON. I/TATEMENT THAT THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS HAVE NOT BEEN PREVIOUSLY USED OR EXERCISED BY ANOTHER PERSON. ?EALED SURVEY FOR BOTH THE SENDER AND THE RECEIVER SITES WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OR ACREAGE OF EACH SITE. "COPY OF THE ZONING MAPS WITH SENDER AND RECEIVER SITE CLEARLY HIGHLIGHTED AND LABELED I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE LAS representations made in this application S,y^? orn to and subscribed before me this J0441- day of are true and accurate to the best of my Arch A.D., 11492PO?5 or knowledge. by ZLc/C¢ (c,{ragpp/ o Ls ersona 4_ p known has produced as identificat' A. ig toe of propert ne o presentative Notary ublic, my commission expires: Gina Boivin S:application -forrnsldevelopnrentreviewitransferofdevelopmenf rights applicalion.doc '.• a_ mmisslon Expires: Ma 29 2007 /S _? 5 / % FObto :: y , Bonded Thru Atl i . ant c Bonding Co., Inc. Z 1, , 0 4b ORIGINAL SITE FROM WHICH THE TDR WILL BE TRANSFERRED (sender site): PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS : IC& i lea- a, 1>9 GL? ?Yl?dcl t'?? ?? 7? PHONE NUMBER : FAX NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION : ?'tTtkD j?t?Y ?5irta (IF IN METES AND BOUNDS, ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET) STREET ADDRESS : -*060 E?AMIPF-" pie-" PARCEL NUMBER: ZONING DISTRICT: J- SIZE OF SITE : bt O AC, EIVED CURRENT USE OF THE r ??,? PROPERTY: 15 06_[?L f- ?y?R.1?? " ??AD 31 70(# OF HOTEL ROOMS, DWELLING UNITS, COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA, VACANT) ?TATi?Q?j ?+ HOW No 'i +=R o iaSLLOCiaE THIS SITE? PLANNING DEPARTMENT HO J ONYE[=LOj?INt?1?T RIG?iTS ARE BEING RAN FERRED? CITY OF CLEARWATER HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PREVIOUSLY BEEN TRANSFERRED TO OR FROM THIS PROPERTY? YES 1'--440 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION: COPY OF THE WARRANTY DEED OF OWNERSHIP OR CONTRACT TO PURCHASE THE RECEIVER SITE; TATEMENT THAT THE DEED OF TRANSFER WILL BE RECORDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. STATEMENT THAT THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS REFLECTED IN THE INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE HAVE NOT BEEN CONVEYED TO ANOTHER PERSON. ..aL STATEMENT THAT THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS HAVE NOT BEEN PREVIOUSLY USED OR EXERCISED BY ANOTHER PERSON. /SEALED SURVEY FOR BOTH THE SENDER AND THE RECEIVER SITES WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OR ACREAGE OF EACH SIT/E. V COPY OF THE ZONING MAPS WITH SENDER AND RECEIVER SITE CLEARLY HIGHLIGHTED AND LABELED t, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. SigrtvaWt'd of property owner or representative UiM --It/ Aw !;I STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ? day of /-I,&# Crl A.D., 19 to me and/or by :VtrLVV/ who is personally known has produced - D Ai??t L i r as identific ion. id a2?_ Nota public, my commission expires: NOTARY PUBUC-MTE OF FLORIDA '.r'Sl?lE F. 1\DYrl1K CONDUSSION # DD367467 Expms: DEC. 11, 2008 S: application forms/development review/transferof development rights application.doc I? 0 RECENED MAR 31 2005 PLikNNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER http://Citeis.clearwater-fl.com/outr)ut/Testzoniniz IMSMAP35883644434.pna 3/29/2005 Page 1 of I RECEIVED MAR 31 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER http://citygis.clemwater-fl.com/output/TestZoning_IMSMAP35882880446.png 3/29/2005 0 Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning March 29, 2005 Ms. Cyndi Tarapani City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE:325 S. GULFVIEW BLVD. FLD 2005-02021 Dear Ms. Tarapani: *ORIGINAL 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keithCa)_keithzayac.com Please accept this letter as a supplement to the project referenced above regarding the TDR application. This letter is provided to acknowledge the following required information: 1. The development rights from the Donor property have not been previously used or exercised by another person. 2. The development rights reflected in the instrument of conveyance have not been conveyed to another person. 3. The deed of transfer will be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 20(caly? MAR 31 2005 PL4NNING DEPA?TIL4' ENT OIIYOF OLEARWATER MARABELLA ATTACHMENT D Receiver Project Parcel Locations: Americana Gulf Motels, LTD Roma PARCEL # 07/29/15/52380/000/1110 326 CORONADA DR Lucca Development Triplex PARCEL # 08/29/15/17586/001/0120 345 CORONADA DR Tomasz & Stella Wilk Tropicana PARCEL # 08/29/15/17586/001/0130 347 CORONADA DR Tomasz & Stella Wilk Tropicana PARCEL # 08/29/15/17586/001/0140 353 CORONADA DR Americana Gulf Motels, LTD Howard Johnsons PARCEL # 07/29/15/52380/000/0630 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD US-Eurotrade, Inc. Albatross PARCEL # 08/29/15/17604/000/0080 346 HAMDEN DR Tomasz & Stella Wilk Tropicana PARCEL # 08/29/15/17604/000/0010 350 HAMDEN DR ORIGINAL MAY 12 2005 1 Prepared by: Gina Havens Title Clearinghouse 423 Mandalay Avenue Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 File Number: 04-1177-03 1 0 0 ORIGINAL KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2005028926 01/25/2005 at 02:20 PM OFF REC BK: 14081 PG: 164-164 DocType:DEED RECORDING: $10.00 D DOC STAMP: $6300.00 General Warranty Deed Made this January Itg4j,, , 2005 A.D. By Lois J. Clymer, a single woman whose address is: 401 Coronado Drive Clearwater Beach, FL 33767, hereinafter called the grantor, to FIFTH SOUTH, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose post office address is: 521 Mandalay Ave. #1006, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767, hereinafter called the grantee: (Whenever used herein the term "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations) Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz: Lot 1 of Columbia Subdivision No. 4, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page 50, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel ID Number: 08-29-15-17622-000-0010 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2004. In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Lots J. Clymer Address: 401 Corona rive, Clearwater, FL 33767 Witness Printed Name Al State of Florida County of Pinellas MAR 31 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 144th-day of January, 2005, by Colonial Bank, N.A. as Intermediary for Lois J. Clymer,.,w &is/ase.personafly-known-te-rne-er who-has produced drivers license a&C'5j entificatiQnf- as-3s i?07 bEC-27-2000 S a [ ALA h:' nF +_rt ltre RLEE F...tE..> KKR. ttc% . Flr'""r P INELLRQ_.I:.Q . 8K It 170 PG 171 ,z'L , L H^^ PAc?S j i11141E1i 11111 f111111?111111111111111111111111[ --J ----- , FLti--- ------ - _-- ACcT R ` Frevartd by and P 1' `? -- W l N Stephen G, Watts PEES -? -- - Attorney at Law -- Stephen G. Watts, P.A. $09 Druid Road Clearwater, Florida 33756 -? 727-461-3232 ' L v File Number 00-0315 J _ b_ K SAI Will Call No.: C u A;,9T Space Above This Line For Recording Warranty Deed 0(-50 U-'27-2000 16.41:16 JT 31 DEMAY LAUN y 00M,0000 Dig: PIG EPG: REiCORD T Nuf 00 i PAGES 1 slr, ?` DOG OTr'i0P - DR219 5 W;.';50.0c TOTAL: 5.`f ,nr P CHECK AMT-TENDERED: $5,965,Of CHANGE: ` , 0f D % ----- DEPUTY CLERK This Warranty Deed made this 14th day of December, 2000 between Bay Lawn Motel, Inc., a Florida corporation whose post office address is 406 Hamden Drive, Clearwater, Florida 33767, grantor, wid Bay Lawn L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company whose post office address is 406 Hamden Drive, Clearwater, Florida 33767, grantee: (Whchiev,er used herein the terms "granter" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees) WitneSseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN ANT) N01100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby aclmowledgcd, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Pinetl.as County, Florida to-wit Lots I I and 12, COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 4, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in plat ,Book 27, Page 50 of the Public Records of PINELLAS County, Florida ALSO Lot I-A of COLUMMA SUBDIVISION NO 5, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 31, Page 16, Public Records of PINELLAS County, more fully described on attached Ja<I;HIBItT "A". Parcel Identification Number: 08-29-15_17622-000-0110 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor b.ereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple, that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 1999. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grintot's hand and seal the day and year first above written. ORIGINAL MAY 12 2005 boubleTimec,.? Td Hd60:TO S-300_ Lr_f -ielJ '9b'S T&S 2T' Ohd dNOHd ..H}' OWNER'S FORM Schedule A State: FL County' PINELLAS Agent16ranch #: 1495"00-0315 File Number Policy Number Effective Date Effective Time Amount of Policy 30W00-6316 OP-9-1495-33 December 27, 2000 5:14 P.M. $850,000.00 commitment#: t.;M-9-1495-33 1. Name of Insured: Simultaneous-#: LP-12-1495-31/27 Reinsurance BAY LAWN, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company 2:. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: FEE SIMPLE 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in the insured. 4• The land referred to herein is described as follows: Lots 11 and 12, COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 4, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page 50 of the Public Records of PINELLAS County, Florida. ALSO, beginning at the intersection of the high water mark of the Gulf of Mexico and the East and West center line of Section 8, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; and run thence East along the East and West center line of said Section 8, 164.38 feet; thence South 1573.94 feet; thence South 77°25'30" East, 280.00 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence South 7°25'30" East, 10 feet; thence South 12°34'30" West, 50.87 feet; thence North 77°25'30" West, 10.0 feet; thence North 12°34'30" East, 50.87 feet to Point of Beginning, otherwise described as Lot 1-A of COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 5, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 31, Page 16, Public Records of PINELLAS County, Florida. 1 Issued By: 1495*00-0315 _ STEPHEN G. WATTS, P.A. Coun ersig ed Authorized Signatory 809 DRUID ROAD MAY 12 2005 CLEARWATER, FL 33756 J ORIGINAL Note: This Policy consists of insert pages labeled Schedule A and S. This policy is of no force and effect unless all pages are inclu along with any added pages incorporated by reference. Td 14JOT : TO SOO.E. LE. '-I ld 179bS TOS 2T-) i=ih! 3-10Hd StPz 91 t•1CI_??hl I =? l•JOdd i+\r / .. ^ GRAPHIC SCALES ? .. < -A XXOi I - -t e - w n If. GbVnO .m awn b nmewe w bwnory 4 e<cwn<Eeb nw gon0nw. lo. wn ..bs?p mwe ua on pMUmN au,?no uw bne.<p Imtgbwn men a meee.e pu sL A,wwun. XI. m. l?aX<eP. e.rcw<tm w a wesen.bb re. In. wn,<w?, bmmel. eAe owo.. a.Pba a eny ena a am. ? w..em ebMO Im Maabl? a we aelea. 6 ? ?. ., .we. e44?A.e awn ,Xxl a .ey awX b .mbe. o a GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES uP. e.nmae..na ama. d.eu.o e.a.. e. ma..e. m wwu. oo u. eml,xa...e -A. ow'mwm i I. a z r q . am.? z. e.e qem ma«veM .q X. e. owb xe. I m saw .. egsnw h u. Pmwe bm r x ? n P T .r > m,...m .. . .w., M . ;?? ,. tl Imm Mw ro m.. ' 3. w genu.X exm a bw M e<.wmem..m? a. rMnee wx.mnen: ene c?o.a . Awwaolan. wP>we ownww. ? .. AX? . pwX b 1-1- .IIA AV- x-4-3 -1. e. P.< aw mpr«Iwn. m.gi<wu,?w M w k'- s. m. q ?r? tgo.<: s ?aw??a soz eymmb mabrlm <amm%e9 er .?l-ems. ? ?.e ?.<i M ?w?e l p y ? a . w Xw e al aY a.Wnww Rum aM etlw a Mlan. tames one vo.-I dim mpe<iy. II MroX Nw W fn bbv. l A-A ? w p<nuny ewes pll w<Mw , 3• ley.. a <rPw.< mo?..gm 4 4 s..a.we-In enm MaawtlU. L - T. m. pem mebnq .p.eew b -d rP u. <a..M.?? a xw lw.e..ww a<lb..u.. M a. <w.t a e ewe wl.wn IA. Plw ene w mmI An. u. pm. mm nw<m. r :, !i tl f. <,,,•wq.a a.<malon. M m°bna ,a m.bg m.al?uee. wa e...mewe ?'??e .b.? l lw .ewn>': `m ` r . ?I < ? a. w e ra --g nelr ea. u. .la one .-A u.<.•w.q« mom n0i '° u e iw a ftlpem r I ? ? b e m I. l u ro>tbe ro u. Lwapp. A : x'^p°e .PeenX . mob na <emwa <wnpmen rm anew ro wve.I .Ixn?s ,t tn. I n a slee? e ge . z ? Iw ? . rtin. Ih .em a o-l, e< . ene,. l P . .<p e . m. a elaMO. _(? Io. rlw Laa.wP. eolmao. mm b w.Xen:q. rm waam m .....mr eP.Xeeew A..wb eee u<.„e. ro P.?rbm ..4. ? ub qen r1 one sw pan<cuen. I ? U I I. nmA b Ob ?ppwtlm w<moge. el aaq? Ye+O IM bNxep ApeM b ? a 4 M .x1iq gaipn. ? 12. A+y eM a xunlaa <bwwrerw Ow pen M eW/s p6Ice4ma Mw0 b a•c1<e ro u< IoN«ee< rcMl<cl a (T1l) i0,3-0000 ? 7 Z ? m abup, egab< a uMNI'm aua Ow Mn appwel a tn. ewr. la. P, . M .expo, qem .uMwarb ro. a P..be a Iwlw lIZ] menu. tiom xwI ?ne.?sr Im we.w. am mm« E- W F* ? Is. a.a Imlmee0iwt:y le-`M`u. ?,.er u. lone.ww cones<? wle, ro lena.mw ma.nm Immnmlm. oumw•e.. z I0. ..bb mua a a pgiwe m u. qem rot .o.cxrcellvw e? :wwau I»? ewel ? lvMOee -;-I xeno ...l1h u . ?wne. a no eae:l?®l ew. ?Xm h uw eA w A v. L4 a p r P P ¢ ? K ` Ii. w wmXb npwwy ab 4 lw we+b.0 q uw Mgaiq wnwaar enMn WwwH< peifbM aa<e M lM par ? U a I0. xo <wxbero< N<n11<welion apes WO E. p.mYlbtl m tla O.W.e4 .<wq rer w. Ixeq<t udwmasw apm. a a o a ? I IRRIGATION NOTES a z I A M..mM.. Mgeco? ewXan. lroX 4eMe'-It 7 <ww. 4 a P?wo..e d a peeuge. w0 e. b.y,we mw :aew. a w.<?> 3 : m.? x+oglen »wbm mwX m..l > .««e m °5?°°` w <Pe. a m .A r..., a,<. ne. Pw<«,t.,,. Aeromek P,M 4°nq'o..x...4..J a x<sexen bm mw a M-ftd mw -d er LemKp -i- U e. a meaA. I.nsetM, mw< m.a ab we. ra,m --4 G la www. Ion <ow?uc•ero meeb . min .m.w o-w txw. g eellen w-wnt e?aana...nen accwelPo me <+.eM a.mmi oa mwlrcoum. ? ? ? d /> .waXwp, mNt b .,galbe P4. ro rw M,P.<Lw, .x. ,paen« ? a xw ge<.n.0 em w...wgr lx. mx.p a` 1v ' :"ye`,? Q- """ w a:wa cenw<es. e. me.MO Imgee,. ,town ?.Pewel..M a etw.e. Pe ..M memo<aew.: 8 m *ir?Ipb. s.x a.eN?o. Pw..m.-cenw.weww P..nbe W. «:«olc"I-° ?Mela smuen alone. ww nm.. "o"o RwxbM - zIAAV« r a.ae< vales - w• neene wn. ee.. 5TH b PLANT LIST a __ I Lww.e.mM lm..,a?.Imb,a«i.NlaTw. Lbwwm y.wxblwn.iw.I cxT.mTwA w<..e.m wabn n m m.rrar«. e k 11 A PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.L.S. u? R .F 5'P.c. "/ M{Abxd+ImAU,ingx lYrgvm,i Ml.:3.60.CL e xP «axum oxxiwsr, awm.?,awF, ?Nr.FZO.u 88 0 99 sremmr 0 nAt; s a c. R xf.l z o.e. p «T.1 8? uun, Ogelw Lp TUI, 0 ow.: I.5' ac ; YnW tNep.M Q _ ; °?° "? a '" Q` '° ax . w weX.ew zPAS?.P WTox?naouEa `? _ _ IMf10P0 0 PALM TREES REMOVAL & RELOCATION I. 1 3-0- ACe• Pw0i1.A Pmma `IX mPl ., , riyr .ma sa rnf runic 9s TYK -G (0/0) - . < 26 1 2•0' PA4M 3.5 9 12" PAIR L.0( 32 1 PALM 3.5 to IS• ALM 3. 5 bl ?u) ]• . z• (rtP) 35 13" PALM 3.5 IS +6" vALN 3.5 ?K 37 12" PAL 3.5 a..?R PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) O.w w 1A ALM J.5 REQUIRED DISTANCE ,..,_ a C PALN 3.5 TYPE A BARRIER a +o' PALM 3.s s«cnw FROM TREE TRUNK A6 10" PALM 3.5 85 TOTAL 14 of 15 CIIIK TAR! ',` ) I O? yappp EFFy Yg 7 v GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES I. • Waeepow cpmmelm Mdi Omee doaxP Mep. a. .wYM, b Warw. walHe enimpp aM pramab mOmum dam B.o.m. ri R. n.w ma ppm ma.AnY ao a a. H meat w ow?na % u. rk?aa PZ: ponmom AYYP. wp a sxaa.. Year a Pbmmi uao 'cAen Pne simaproo !a wPnan . GRAPHIC SCALE EdUm, M aae • m.. Ge.xo Anmbean uen. ]. b pap6,q .w :, aaaeom..an b, naaa wnaamw'. as . apPa? as ' ?p m ) ., a?a.? yew e. r.,u..e an bleam? w-lo-e laew a. P. n. mm.,ra.m..r..p.eraawn .n wnFmn*'w .u I M1 5. to dwu^9 w a..e a Ue apPpamob prapPBaly a. roepn' S0 para we 00 arymk mabad wmYBr9 of neon p% M?.wmwne eo.eua. kor mae ma by PaJ. M P.xe. a awe PPOao one aimmRxV m; ee .?a a"°P`aNb .o.ee. aaa'? mro wbr-naaw wPwnr. n amR aw n. rn, a al .xwn.aa. e.en> 'MI goabq ann yW1 nuF. a J' bra a pOrm make, xirtn N b M whoa-Y aM 1 n. ? n n tl io ont a wnb?n al tln LaMwew Gnlmctar. 1 o eicr.pwry b w a p v MN ? l bw dan .M1al Il n bn e . Pbnl 4 iY. 6. mom. nai m.a a...<naiwr. mm .way owcRhaebn.. air mamba oa nn.aw .nuncotwn .nPe e. mna.w aM rypP.e e1 tM aoneoxa'e .apeme. 4n..0 w.mbcl aw.. v ? b xi JS+ wo PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) YbM? mam.,b?1Paauw tl ??rP. w?InmR wr emn u. xr. me xY ae eoPwwb. dx..pmPY. u. 11m. a I rb t? i e.%mw?n °?nna'?"'omwxb. rm rw?,n w .mar wM m.a?uom a ra .?ena"a°en u. ?iu wnanaw calc.nm ar u. cm. a e?w:,R. m. wne.aPw caaPaP. Woe a r.oPm tY a. ..par+a m n.p«wrr owscaY wmmb we epw.. b waam Ba wn, .x ram x w. Pbn .x oM uY m.anmbn. aoa? t ?wai a eb n m.arba .a.n a?enw+e. a xaa lb,. a. tA?mw wa'e.a er x arvnR a xtmap ao.y... m (m)aivJ? CgK°'?b' ao olw .a one/a wax?wlkn..MR e. r..al.e b me IeNOaap aaame Tn. wnemap. wemab. as womnb.. in mBaa• amt .aaneaq mroe o.noe a n... (ra) nwmn m,m rma awPton<. % rM p.n.. e4mmimp ro b rMe-dnMe ey 1M Wnea.po Conb.ptm prbr w bMaep. maim ealo/mtbn. GPPPwnan Pha swan imm.xm.ry b m. owa. mw pn max eo n opwrne m b, iPneocPW pan. mal.rab a hem ee not oeMn m mwxbelMn, tMr wa a rxw h lM GV Paint gonwx aln papa nnbpaim wmM oa ey ?aneaaw Cp.V.aar at w wertbwl wst. M wmeb na.prorr m. q M avriE.U er Me imlaaHN amW<Nr aaen eVYrax mmakpq xatM b Vb e0airrtPlbn Yo Ponlrwtor ge4Trtpoon eqw Mxi p pmmitbo m Be pnj.x. mwm Ax W PoM xfamagn aRm. EaPbq Poe r1W M rmw..a n .noa.ary oavnoeob w. pmtirya. AmJ .alxx9 a.ve ma m Pneee.e epivq 1M bM.mq inraatwn xMl b nmeaw aM Si Apwew tlwllmn". TM wmraoPa Cmenarm M b rnpnnOY rm q. mbcEp+..anaN, eM papa ebppM a anY am e Ponwobe ewbN rM :nMbem a INa Poieal. ai arm. eamae .Mk rqa a .pr awp a mebe. IRRIGATION NOTES I ap. xHmem mrmn. tMt Pprb.. 1ooa: m..on m ai pnpaoe dpnwq...m ewmop ane xxabp Yr m. caxroPwr. ? ?pPCo'n°a'non. (.?0°leopro: Pn:.aw?.twt?eu? Ra° °?MmnCO"'o: a•`w?._) s. Frpallm ayxan m„a a bwam one as pbe er r.ne- AmnAwl Pbr w baablbn .r mach. xapaEOn mux m.a dV apb xa0m J-11W.C to Pabo 100 a ran nnwr •mx. spa n-e.Rr en.HN...nkn acwtq am awM dmcry a mosrmlbn. ?. t/a?.w.u:uwn. mwl a .mau.a Pao. to Hna 1mo.<ua+ we «mtmw. s YH. lP•ewm. cmanarm max awroYa. tM aoam.m am Pa.e aimN ra w. YHaow wneol Bmx .aM1 u. wa.a cemmaa. e. aY. bwa? HMaeon .ax.m aammmb .ei a wa:w, wr ..a, mmaompa. lrto??m TM.1vo fiat CYOnirp. Pnnon<arbenepOrq FmMm Ihb H%adE - APlnobi 6 atPUpn Ooboa Comm imx akxOm. - RIURV t` flpclrb vaA. 0' Rmrx VPM Boa. PLANT LIST aprnvp.mY Bake, cow Byme, e•Hr. NiorvA lga.a,m ,.wm.an, Tb. tRAaxmt a Ha. Ywrma c.m:? P.nn tm c'i.n.i r c-t: c.* H. wLaln.zro.c. wybY? 1mv, ?biu:wm a wL.: zs oc. _ BALCr HT.z.3 ?YwP vevwm a wt.: a' o. c. R HTJ EP EYpwpapie.sdemoma WL.;aOGI'f M.1 Ta lx L P uvn, eq axe lAy rw, a ou.; lsoc. A PAM TREES REMOVAL c RE 0 ATI N PAM A lam B 9ff fePE RATNO sm TYPE RARNc 26 fo" PALN 3.5 B 12" PAW A.0 J2 12" PALM ].5 1k 15" PAW J.5 35 13' PAW 3.5 +5 t6" PAtAI ].5 3l 12" PAW 3.5 i0 ' YA" PAW 3.5 ' PAW 35 Ys to' PAW 15 t6 W. PAW ].5 65 TOTAL f f` ??dC V Q ? zz (? v, N Q V ? Z a o F W U 6 J EP] a a t G. a Q zz 6NEEr 12 OF 15 PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. GENERAL NOTES: I. ENGINEER/LANDSGAPE ARCHITECT: NEITH ZAYAC k ASSOOATES. INC. 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 104, SAFETY HARBOR. FL 34695 ('2)) )9J-9886 fixs (I JBJ-9855 Fuv i k 2. SITE ADDRESS: 325 5 CULFNEW 91-40 CTEARWATER, FL 33767 PARCEL ID: PARCF1 A PARCEL B PARCEL C r GRAPHIC SCALE 0)/29/15/52310/000/0630 08/n/1s/t7586/401/0120 Ofi/Z9/is/17801/0W/0080 Y I OJ/Z9/15/32380/000/1110 08/29/15/17388/001/0130 08/29/15/1)601/000/0100 4A 08/29/15/1)666/001/0140 ae/z9/1s/1760 a/oW/aofia .,t, 1 I aB/2B/15/nbot/aW/0100 ? ZONING: lkl?PJ 1 e0 I 3. PRESENT USE OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS & MULTIFAMILY RE90ENTIAL . ZS y I ` ? - 4. DEVELOPED USE 101 RESUNDAL D'AEWNG UNITS WTH ANMENIPES (CONDOIAINIUMS) T F 9 III it I y I I ) `, 5. SIZE AREA 9T¢ PARCEL P PARCEL 9 PARCEL C -L F. N 4 d r r I ?? ` 61.212.39 SF (1.11 AC) 40.561.13 SF (0.93 AC) 1.381.59 SF (QOJ AC) fT(rAl Pi + L I , 'R , wlc 90ERUn TOT. SITE AREA 103,155.11 SF (2.]) AC) i 3 i_ ;I R R 6. SETBACKS: BLQUM FRONT 25 SST (MIN) 16.2?5? SW IH (MIN) 1.: ? v mHt. OmEWA, I? -( . A.P Pw N/s'n nano _ I , va ) fa1d FAST (BBGj/0.9 M+101s.GO' WEST =)/0.0- Q ! + swxcw / I&OW EAST (PWT) G ¢ P 1 l1`I` b r t f PATfcNRk I 0-10 9DE 15.00 NORTH (MIN) 1500' NORTH (MM) F, ? 1 25 t9' SOUTH (MM) w r z `fl ! Z `Y I ). ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 35* -10a' FT ¢ f 20`x70' 9pT xBBUn m o - - ryJyy PROPOSED BLDG IDC. HEIGHT ]IS' M FROM CTMA LINE TO M DANE OF ROOF (PARCEL A) y z W Q Noettn sax w mAw[ RvsT ? ; I ?? T"ffr F ? ? ? Y /,? ) Q3 50-0' FROM R1A LINE TO NIOUNE OF ROOF (PARCEL 8) ? •J 01 E? JO'lx rT C ' _ .[iiTYT' LOT WIDTH 241Z MINIMUM (PARCEL A) Q Y """''11111--111 )J/ ff 196.]• MINIMUM (PARCEL B) V ? Q O1 ) Y) I I ! B. SOUR WASTE COMPACTORS MU BE LOCATED IN BUILDING I EOPJ r r+( /? _ I l 11 ; =ro_ ?. I I C ; [0 S. EXISTING PASULON RCEL A?TPRINi AREAS PARCEL B PARCEL C a e'swMw),isW (m.1J d lI ` ,. a ?? C.?. 18.390 3 (0.42 AC) MAID SF (0.35 AC) W SF (0.00 AC) TOTAL EXISTING BUILDING AREA 3].820 SF (0.78 AC) 0 7 e.l A TOTAL PROPOSED ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA 367,907 SF (843 AC) E6N5wWCR6 ;r6? / '? a I o.q}}} ,{, m ??'/ Y R; dLTQ 10. ALL DISTURBED MASS WTHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SWRD. d k I ) Q ( 11. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB O co F • I I o ` xy` j '{ E. SOEWAU(, kVD LANDSCAPING TO MATCH E%ISTMC CONDITONS O co 4. v I I Locinax 1 12. FLOW ZONE: P4 PROPERTY UES WTHIN ROOD ZONE NE' OEPXCTED 44, .X II Y R+ / br" i -_•, ON FEMA FLOOO INSURANCE ATE MAP NO. 121AC3C0102G (EIEV 13) [,3 a DAMD. SEPTEMBER 3, 2003 e I]. A COMPREHENSW SIGN PACKAGE WA BE SUBMITMD FQ z UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION. ? 3 I ,U 6 ,` 14. ALL SITE UGHTNG WILL BE ATTACHED TO BUILDING. NO FREE 2 6' Q. 1 STANDING UCHFNC IS PROPOSED, d 4 % 7 15. THERE ARE NO UTUTY EASEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY 911E SURVEY ON a .] y s WIC tx)[ . - .!.. s w9uF WO[W1UP -5 PROPERTY. C EJ W (2)g I8. THERE ARE NO ENNROMENTALLY 1110UE AREAS ON SITE. 9D 5( ¢?. A AR6d•p AsoXM?roD (m.) '! I), ALL MECHANICAL GATES ARE TO BE PLACED AOLF FROM THE r BACK EDGE OF SIDEWALK. SEE ARCHITECTURAL FLANS FOR DETAILS. h OG e 5 TN STREET m INM 9 SAM IAIU IPASEL ABA a mnHG: ?2DSD ? OWKKA, Om) A. MT. 91E AREA 10],165.11 7 (2.37 AC) 101155.11 SF (2.37 AC) 10,000.00 SF (MN) Y Q3 B. TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 21,781 9' (ON AC) 30,212.53 SF (BOB AC) C. BU9ANC FOO-NT: 71820 4 65990.00 SF RwT xWBUrr mAx0.E E SDEWALKAEOt/PAVED AM, 11,161 SF 8,82258 S - eaF vx w Eusm Npi ?, *c x 1pwr. r?N F. TOT4 9W+ERMOJS AREA 80.981 3 (0.)9 W) )7,91258 9' (R)O I W) 97.997.35 5(0.95 W) b >s w At ERSHSC wAOE TxE G. PARKING SPARTF 279 IOM ODE WPIIMI 152 (1-5 S`-/w" -1) u i i (9 KC 9'1455 AWUmxcI € I 137 9.P4 Pmm 0 15)(1 S SP.1OS 5)COXW MATE N n B H. VE}tlMAR AREA 197091 SF ..SF - p I, wMRKR LANDSCAPE AREA - o N/A B e q' P J. MIAT FAMILY UNIR J PIRGEI B TOTAL 101 TOTAL 1)1 91 PARCEL A _ - - P CD 10 PAR(A B K 0WMNO1T Ap pN4c0A- 113 0 w _n - 1 v LEGEND CN?W TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD BEARING - .52 31.12 1 ' -J O 52 57.62 '1 'SS' CBF1 - - P .5z .52 Ss. DO 55.00 - 9(11 .52 m &46 N ' -P C-1 F .32 .52 .62 0.16 H 6.6 I •4) , NI "131, I,`E -? IMlwccr 6ouNDAR, -Wlla gg ?? ed - ARO6RCNRAL PAKMEXi PR0P05m CON. PAIENENT am •.. ... Eli, r ? O O C.J7 ORIGINAL mNRTUi ?.? GENERAL NOTES: 1. ENONEER/lAHpSCAPE ARMTECT: KEN ZAYAC R ASSOCIATES, INC. 70t ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404 SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 (121) ]93-9888 Ix )Z) ]93-9855 Fax 2. SITE ADDRESS: 323 8 GULFWEW BLVD CTEARWATER. FL 33161 PARCEL ID: PARCEL A PARCEL B PARCEL C 0]/29/16/52300/000/0630 GRAPHIC SALE 0]/L9/IS/52380/000/I110 08/29/15/1]586/001/0120 08/29/15/1/000/0080 08/29/15/1]586/801 /01 SO 08/29/15/11604]804/000/0100 09/29/15/1]586/001 /OI t0 08/29/15/1160/WO/ 08/29/I S/1]604/000/OIW 0100 1 W Flsr) ZONING: 'Y I bop . W R 3, PRESENT USE OVERNIGHT ACCOMMWAFONS A[ MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 4. DEVELOPED USE 3 101 RESDENTAL DWEWNG UNITS WTi AMNEN11N:5 (CONDOMINIUMS) 3. SITE AREA PARCEL A PARCEL B PARCEL C 61,21239 SF (1.41 AC) 40,561.13 BF (0.93 AC) 1,361.59 SF (0.03 AC) TOTAL STE AREA 103.155.11 SF (23] AC) 6. SETBACKS ffAffi D Effim .B PN ' 0-15• FRONT 250.0W'EASielDC)pWEST (YIN)(PVI1) 6 16 1500• WEST .25• SOUTH ( (YINMN)) 15 15.00• EAST (BLOC)/0.0' (PVMT) 0-10' SIDE 15.00• NORTH (MIN) 15.00' NORTH (MIN) 15.19• SOUTH (MW) ]. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 35'-100• FT PROPOSED BLDG. HO(91i ' 50•-0• FROM FENA IkNE 10 YIIXINROOF (PARCEL R) LOT WDTN 1IQ16DR'(f?AT A 184.3' MN,- (PARCEL B) 8. SOLID WASTE COMPACTORS WLL BE LOCATED IN BUILDNG 9. EXISTING BUILDING FOOT-NT AREAS PARCEL A PARCEL B PARCEL C 18.]80 SF (0.42 AC) 15410 SF (0.35 AC) W 3 (ODD AC) TOTAL EXISTING BUILDING AREA 17,820 SF (0.18 AC) TOTAL PROPOSED ENCLOSED BUILOWG AREA 361.901 $F (845 AC) 10. ALL DISTURBED CRASS WAIN RICHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED. 11. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB SDEWALN. AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS 12. FLOW ZONE: MS PROPERTY LIES WAIN FLOW ZONE "VE• AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE YAP NO, 1210MO102G (ELEV 13) DATED: SEPTEMBER 3. 2003 13. A CW REHENSVE SIGN PACKAGE WLL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPUCAFON. 14, ALL STE UGHTWC WLL BE ATTACHED TO BUILDNG. NO FREE STANONG UGHTING IS PROPOSED. 15. THERE ARE NO UTFUTY EASEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE SURVEY ON THis PROPERTY. Q 16. THERE ARE NO ENMROMENTALLY UNIOUE AREAS ON SITE. 3 1]. ALL MECHANICAL GATES ARE TO BE PUCW 40LF FROM THE BACK WLF OP SIOEWAK. SFE ARCMTECTIIRA PLANS Fpt DETAILS. 1& WIl 98 01TA 118E RMRBI A R h R Emma ffm!= BEOam A. TOTAL STE AREA 10115511 S£ (231 AC) 10315511 S (231 AC) IDODDOO 7 (MW) -\ & TOTAL OPOI SPACE 21,791 S (0.50 AG) JOZ4ZS3 4 (669 AC) G BUILDING FOOT: 31820 S' 65mm 3 SOEWAIA/bECK/PAWD AREA 11,161 SF &92258 3 F. TOTAL AIPERWOUS ME04 80.981 S' (O.]9 SDI .(Nu G. PMMNC SPACES: 2A NTY G3IE O3RIMT 152 (LS 6PAlE$/CBlOO V1Tf ro RG PACb NOWD) ?? N. VEHICJIM AREA 191094 SF 0. 00 S G 1. WTO80R LANDSCME AREA - 0 N/A 91 J. NIRT FAMILY UNITS: 3 PARCEL B TOTAL TOTAL 101 91 PARCEL A t0 PARCEL B N. OWNNIDIT ACCOMMODATIONS: 113 0 LEGEND (TON.) TYTNCAL ?..?..?..? PRp6G180ONDMY # ARCM1- F.1fMENT PROPOSED GONG. FAIFYENT f T 4 1 .U.I W ,JE N > dl d Q U u ? O r7 d 0 O W E- E- d a W U a (L zdI ..i E - w 4 of 15 1 W-11 W-11 IN F-Al 0 ;o Z o m 0 O o ? C4 ?m 0 m T PT7 • O 71 G-) D • 9 0 110 it ' =L_ o g c? G eD"?n m F-? N O d O L?l r43.©l 0 • CD 7U rr n ? Oz ? CAD DR7v ? 1 1 it r{ ,r .1 1 17777717 7i M 7?r c CD oz c? MM CAD O ?. m d3ldMdd310 30 AL10 m3Wiama 9NINw7d SON T ? 8vw G?AM:37,jm r? U BUILDING AREA TA5ULATIONS LEVEL NUMBER OF UNITS PARKING - LEVEL 1 0 PARKING - LEVEL 2 0 LEVEL 3 9 LEVEL 4 9 LEVEL 5 9 LEVEL 6 9 LEVEL 1 9 LEVEL 8 9 LEVEL 9 9 LEVEL 10 9 LEVEL 11 5 LEVEL 12 - PENTHOUSE 5 LEVEL 13 - PENTHOUSE 5 LEVEL 14 - PENTHOUSE 3 LEVEL 15 - PENTHOUSE 2 TOTAL 5UILDING RESIDENTIAL UNITS : TOTAL BUILDING PARKING: ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA (SF) TERRACE AREA (SF) 3'1,618 680 31,618 850 19,292 5,380 19,292 2,446 19,292 2,446 IS,2W 2,446 I%292 2,446 Ig,2g2 2,446 19,292 2,446 19,292 2,446 10,663 2.240 10,663 1,808 10,663 1,808 6,198 1,412 6,198 1,412 92 UNITS 141 SPACES (INCLUDING 5 HC SPACES) ADDITIONAL 2ND SPACES FOR OUNER ON 5tH NORTH PARCEL REQUIRED PARKING: 138 SPACES PROVIDED PARKING: 141 SPACES TOTAL ENCLOSED 5U!LDING ,4RE,4: 252,1222 SF. TOTAL TERRACE AND VERANDA BUILDING AREA: 32032 SF. IVN191H • 11 RECOVED PEAR 3 1 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RESORT RESMENCIES IM MlA?O Wt? ei6aND el•Iee AT?Alrl 1N•IA7 AT•LA aR R11ge-IeTL1 • a S 1?1t • • •t0 eAY ?L • • ~? eke U- L • • \ftl , ? lAK tm • • tr1Lr-ltlIM01r • ??• !yy ?? IIA•! f)r 1•A Lw? oft TafAt eaewle1tle111IL WM. tlu•q TmAi elnw FY•Oli wr.u.na.tl.elNC rAeaa A 1p 9 p1 11L so r+?olrLw aNN eE •rl ALAN r?11aL L ? a p ? Hgtlae ? M TOTAL ecaowD rLRDl1! ptlh sm r. T01AL Tw•mgo%tlWOA mam" ARM. ewer. weea?Aranle mpe NTA r< ur •wrr asaew• canal weuwr aurseeelr r. aarom Yaf/NYA110N IaeeeOwLNa•er eaac? eanw nrA Rem r. 1lNA=AmA Auer. WAL DMAM ARM "4ww acrwn WD. r+raetlr!-errrNLreea reo•! eLYDLN. Aff GAN ELW. N.a 2" ?"J. "m - 00 arDle Ne1R. N•V~ApwMerV.Mx • «c?•rwwmr Ar• ealwcwnraaacx mmrwmnwcTa! TT••! oom" wLal{a[R 140. ?•1AewLeue arrlwruvw M14aD /Q•Ya11 r11LLYaire•wALw ALAIaY/rwApsclearmSCWKMC •a1N wwlorerAw CA AW n?w L ________________ ORIGINAL GULPVMW BOVIEVARD O Lacer --- ---- -------------------- -------- i i i i i i i I i i L_ _J j i i i i I_--- _t__________r_ CORONADO DRIVE' BTAT1MIM4T1 e TN rr•r o we ATgrl•Ci• glLailN, M ease A10 rwraxle OAKYtln1 rr AALOILa LIMN YGeI! oeo!! re T1e Ar•Le0 a1/etl•JMeIY aoeae• Y waAt•Ie] rf n• {LCJL AlE•tAtT M ACOetlMCf e1N esTlee r•e eecrAeO •N REIpA RA1NaL dm"4 sc" KT1H ? • r w y r e? Ifi{LE Nd? 1=16' Sm ARID! GROUP ltleeereeAeee 40 fpASRpbI IYL I ?.oau.e ? awtlww MA"ELLA CKIMBUmpam CWRT,k"M BaCH FWRMA 0- LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 0 DATE W" 34 2506 ® OoprfI t 2006 80? 1M' . V.0' mm pw ¦ow Vw A1.01 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 31 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAMD 6TATMIEW, to TM rr P w• M?o?1?G1?10pttt M RIMA.IID ltlltlENA GClRT SIN il[f NRCNIf NMM)1 Y>»b eppt? MO11t~ w " W" M6 m110clo" w N = AM LOGIC Y om 01050.010= gON01 Mr1111 1. M R4amwA11A.t1m VVL VM BOU YARD rml MMkA=ibm RRIIs GROUP saonasouAlso Isla-madomm %U4P4 611- dp?rLdLms C? NMAMELLA CU?A"=R B$ACH nAmA • • CORONADO DRIVE ?b MO ? I ¦ Y Y Y B? 1"N 16' LUCCA DEVELOPMENT L LC 0 DATE AMAA712q 1006 ® OOp1rIpM 2006 80ALEi V16• . {-p• lrunmm fl" w A2.01 RECEIVED w4 1 2uh CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL nm aowksmA . AWIT 4110" aru"eL:u low-AW 00-mulftm 0 W 9K+16H1El lYa dd?3? -p ITWE? I ? ? a• t 1 -11 >w ?. 2n I -------------------- e2uo -------------------- I I I i ? I I r I I I I I K >l I I Q ! i I I I ? YI w r I I MA" El" CK'MMACBMW C "'WA7 M BUCH FWRWA • LUCCA DEVELOPMENT L.LC m B? I"= CAM ?Y = 2% 7X6 avem &-" IL70M ? i r y w r ® owyftm 2006 SCALE, t/W . T-0' 1runam PLAN A2.02 RECEIVED u:i 011 w0s ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER GULFVINW BOULEVARD V-10 L WIT D UT E WIT F 2W IF 2w EF CEO S 03/ -- -- - - -- -- ----- ---------- --- --954 I i I F. I COROMMO DR" STATREWs ww mwow,.s,.non wa?w. N PtAfl MD l.lwCdl10O OAlLT !RI M IIO A.IIJ "AwmLoa "fwm-olv ?OCO? wi Af41Rt .f axmN 11.l.EbtL.N6101RY AQOi10W! NIN iT101 N.6.C1Ip N? RLRM RAMr 0 wmm 1" 1 2 ? . mm unr GROW aiM.r.t? Cam"' I AMCNIV ?..4N«. C? MAMBELLA GKIMM=waff CLXn,MM BUCLL FL MA • LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC m DATE W= 2F, 2 ® CopykO l 2006 90ALE VW . Y-O- TI VAM PUN u p& a E A2.03 ORIGIN4L UNIT 0 MIT E UNIT F 2280 SF 2800 OF 2280 5F RECEN E® 11 1111 1110 WIT A 2050 SF ww MAR 31 2005 PLAN[V4G D -? CEARWAYER CITY OF C UNIT C "" t --A LNiT G X00 SF s: ado w"m wrn LNIT 5 2000 SF LLNIT ww w w 2000 SF rr r v ww ww . ? S w ? r ?e _s J ww? Li J w , 1 FEE it H a.' A&-, , t .1 wa 111111 - WIT I 2050 SF dIN14iGlCALB IIORIH ? • r y v r 1 10° .R AMP GROUP 0 IM&MUlomm d?rrd?? A.10MM0 ? ?.IWIM MAMEI" CUWMILM BUCH ROMA 0 I LUCCA DB'VEIDPMIINT -? CA76 YNRCN 24= 80ALE: Y . tLX emannw rum lsvw rio UMBEI4 AA2.04 RECEEVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL UNIT D UNIT E UNIT F 2180 SF 2800 SP 2280 5F UNIT G 1900 SF 6 rest .An- n H! woos sw ou?a?o? 49 fp0?l?fl! 4qlC/-1161 Ps 81?6lam I -.-. MALRBELLA 01,m6fALzmw cW"A"m BUM YWRMA o O j ? O 0 LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 7 OATS "MM 2, 2106 ® OopY.1061 2006 ainewc W" mmm ? • r 2r 1? r $G" IN B0 11" 10' SO&& mmumm p1m up= 11 A2.05 RECEYED mb 1? : 1 20105 ORIGINAL P1 AN LING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER UNIT D UNIT E UNIT F 2280 SF 2800 SF 2280 SF UNIT G 1500 SF UNIT G 1900 SF I?Mtrift AMOT GROUP MUM 3,A &.a P14m dd?lYdt? C? MA?RBBLLA QfImBAmplAw G7,i KWAM BXLCH YIAMA 0 Q atwwc6CAb ?I w 2r r r Nam N- WAR B? 1 `° =10' LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 0 O DATE MA" 24 MW ® oftroa aooe a ue r . w'-o- lunzm mm rsvae ?a-ta A2.06 kLCEVED MAR 31 2005 ORIGINAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT UNIT 0 UNIT E UNIT F 2280 SP 2800 SF 2280 SF war ?? ?? «rr• s>!s>. ssr? ? t1a?r 1 2?r4 { f +^ f ' 1 >AM1 vYMerwir APT GROUP ss u?6u>.sa. 1 ate - • C? •WKtls i MIIOOIM M L"El " CKMONAMMM FWRMA i LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC ¦ OAl W" 34 9006 ® Oup)I10 d 9006 SOALE, f- IW-0' aR,MM sG" ICi?il ? e r s v m -F N B? rm. I" =10° IMUM 6 PLAN IRM 14 sfw A2.0'7 RECEIVED MAR 31 2005 pRIGINAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT UNIT J UNIT K p[AM A urm er" Ii7R(H 4- ?YMt?i?r asor eaoor ta?ou?a?ea? fp-fQ/4t611tia dale: MAJWBI LA QI"msmuzf1117f CIXMA"M SUCH FWRWA LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC m DAIS W" OR 7006 ® OofteeM ROOF AM r . 1c-D- tsm. 76 A2.08 • i z O Z :x n M 3>- 7 m 0 0 00 - r CA m ,-• 1 m -0 cm y ? C D ? m m y BUILDING AREA TA5ULATIONS LEVEL NUMBER OF UNITS ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA (SF) TERRACE AREA (SF) PARKING - LEVEL 1 0 28,112 0 PARKING - LEVEL 2 0 28,135 0 LEVEL 3 0 11,212 16,900 LEVEL 4 5 10,6(03 1,808 LEVEL 5 5 10)663 1008 TOTAL BUILDING RESIDENTIAL UNITS : 10 UNITS TOTAL BUILDING PARKING: 102 SPACES (INCLUDING 4 HC SPACES) TOTAL ENCLOSED RIIILDING AREA: -06Is5 SF TOTAL TERRACE AND VERANDA BUILDING AREA: 20,516 SF. RECEWED MAR 31 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL IJ' aTa?r?-a?r? TO MMR O Aa NO?I?01? RYia:1?1M PlA/a ADl?Y'i1101a OD)!LY aM 1NI N4WN1RfMV7sAp000Oa/ A1D 11a AN4JGYt! RaMa1T RIIDARr Y Dtla.aaD R 1fa /A'K MMIRY M AOCRifY1D1 a/N a1L7M1 aW EKJ Nb as RL?AR.tttq\ @1001 =011 1aa0"a"waa 1 r* m3m 94467." h I =- -m MA?RBa" acnmwmmm CULMAIn U&CH FWWA • LUCCA DKMDPMENT LLC PARKING LEVEL 2 HAMMV DPJM HOTEL RESIDENCIES & SPA 111011'{ClfiLLE 1? t ?-iY Y b d lCrlld N!@i. B 1 n =16° OATS WARM 1b US ® ? 100E 80AL5 7/a' . T-0' ED= • apA FAIDCNC IATYM 1-9 A4.01 V3?C??IVED MAR 31 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER o^ ^e T D? WIf E LW F 1OW OF 2200 OF u?a wtaown wa?oeaaslwAnn t?bwwn.) tM *4 lam i i WA" w w NLSas? . Ww .orx raver ?Aww? ?r AYG•NCVOw+w wgcfu wxrne?ranwna6 ^s V. WA. WWWw NNCN MOM ReA s?R ORIGINAL EMT[ o Q\ ,Q .? r a `P - i 111 / ,\ i / \\y// / :' a?irraT r---- t L------- i u L___- 4L--__ r---ter--- -? i n u rw L_ BUILDING LEVELS 4-5 AMENITY LEVEL 3 M%Yl Lm fimR' C=L rr eM1O1 H"4wr oiw.rer rr tD1 EmP.Ner O.YMa.V mftm4l Iqr el6otaraa mm f,1/ rew?AleA 1yYR TOTAL raa.r rs? wAe m 000~lnb. M1 VOW%"-4N or MR rwr OWN eaw+ni. w'AMYr 0. newe+rlva). )eM•Y r?slrldR. rw/MMIrMerV.)W.. ? rae+?w wear wo raNaaYYrowcx tna msemMwie+a` rns? xeowa?eaie?v. riolmork"ftIt." orr??e?onw nwro°?iYm MwA ra?omo'x°? ?uvne Nwa=ra?1711?ar+.lytw nrAu G 4F p1tMm rab MORBI It B? in M 164 Nb! dW z weoes?saese 9NdSRpll At aewrr?Y?? MAMMA armaLummi yr C10MA"M B$kCH FWRMA LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC m OATS 1*" 74 2ws ® O.aYdOl 4005 gD i1w . r-o- Rom mamnwn t ffiA tsvm " A4.02 • • s Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning February 24, 2005 Mr. Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE:MARABELLA PROJECT TRAFFIC STUDY Dear Mr. Elbo: 0 ORIGINAL 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keitha-keithzayac.com This letter is provided as part of our Flexible Development Application for the Marabella project. Based on our meeting on February 3, 2005 it is our understanding that a traffic impact study will not be required. This understanding was based on the assessment that our project will not significantly impact the roadway network above what is currently developed on the parcels. Thanks for your assistance concerning this matter Zyac, P.E., RLA President Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. ORIGI*L PERMITS 346-04 Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keithAkeithMac.com Mr. Richard Alt, P.E. March 29, 2005 Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637 - 6759 (813) 985 7481 Re: Marabella (Clearwater, Florida) SWFWMD Exemption KZA Project No. 346-04 Dear Mr. Alt: Please find enclosed three (3) sets of plans and aerial photographs for the referenced project. The following table summarizes the existing and proposed (revised) conditions: EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS Total Impervious Area ft2 80,981 72,912.58 Vehicular Parking Area ftz 3,970.94 0.0 Total Site Area f 103,155.11 103,15 5.11 Based on the information enclosed we are requesting an exemption from SWFWMD permitting based on a reduction of post development impervious area. Thank you for your assistance with this project. Please contact us if there are any questions. Sincerely, TXac & Associates, Inc. Keith E. Zayac, P.E.,RLA President Cc: FILE • 61,7 EXISTING SIGNAGE ON PROJECT SITE ORIGINm- MAY 12 2005 .µ ?ls Q?yn pw opj? CAN A OT ELS EFF * APTS • PHONES SPA* CABLE •p40L • FISHING PIER • g_ ? y 1}111 :Rlb F a:a f 4 ? ? i I '> .. ... .. ?x„'.v L5ti2 4 h ARM- ?a axe!'... Y' ?? t?? 2 Sw? ? { g{ ?; a' ? u ? ? ?? '?, ?, '? N C ?. . ? y ? ? ??. ?.}, S y( .: h ? ?. rX, ' ? ' . fit. '.f+?. `c.. `. ? rn.... }. .n7., wv.? ?; 'd: ?? ?? `?. .. .? f ? D I ? < ? y Z mss`' > .? ,. ? 5;?? !" " ? Y •'" { Y?? , yb .? ?:.? ?? '><? ? o } '. { j is-.., ?: :ice' :r .?: ; .y... .f DOCK Boen's Tree Service Inc. P.O. Box 86 Ozona, F1., 34660-0086 Rating System MAY 12 2005 Tree Inventory - Prepared for Mirabella Project, Clearwater, Florida Site overview and tree canopy analysis: The subject property is on Clearwater Beach and consists of existing commercial buildings with associated parking lots, swimming pools and minimal greenspace. The tree canopy is dominated by various palm species both native and exotic. Hardwood tree species are few and nondescript in quality. The majority of palms are in good health with minor nutritional deficiencies and prior improper pruning presenting the greatest problems. Palms with an overall condition rating of 3.0 and above are recommended for on-site preservation or transplanting on-site. Tree Inventory Data The tree inventory establishes a hierarchy of existing trees to assist the site designer in the process of choosing trees to be incorporated into the site design. The inventory includes the following information: 1) Tree number - Each tree is listed by a number that corresponds to the same number physically located on the site plan indicating the location of the tree in the field. 2) Tree Size is expressed as trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above the grade. 3) Tree species is listed by both common name and botanical name the first time they appear and by common name thereafter. 4) The trees overall value ranks the tree on a scale from 0-6 (half increments are used to increase accuracy) based on its overall health (condition). Factors such as size, species and appearance are also considered. 0 - A dead tree. • ORIGINAL I - Trees that are dying, severely declining, or hazardous and trees designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest, i.e., Brazilian pepper tree. A tree with a #1 rating should be removed. 2 - Trees exhibiting serious structural defects (i.e., codominant stems with included bark), large cavities, crown dieback, low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or pH related problems. A tree with a #2 rating should be removed unless the problems will be mitigated. 3 - Trees that have good overall structure, crown density and systemic health with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a #3 rating should be preserved if possible. 4 - Trees with good structure and systemic health with problems that can easily be corrected with minor maintenance. Trees should exhibit good form with above average crown density. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. Trees with a #4 rating should be preserved and warrant site plan modification for preservation. 5- Trees with high live crown ratio, exceptional structure, systemic health, good form and free from any serious disease, insect problem or nutritional deficiency. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic qualities. Trees with a #5 rating lend considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. 6- Specimen tree - A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities relating to size, specie, form, uniqueness, structure, systemic health and crown density. A specimen tree must be preserved and incorporated into a site design with an undisturbed area equal to the tree's dripline. NOTE: Palms trees with less than 10' of clear trunk are shown because they appear on the plan but are not evaluated as they are not regulated by the City of Clearwater tree ordinance. Tree Inventory Tree# Size Species Rating 1 13" Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 4.0 MAY 12 2005 2 <10' clear trunk n/a 3 16" Washington palm 3.5 4 <10' clear trunk n/a ORIGINAL 0 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 <10' clear trunk n/a 14" Norfolk Island pine (Araucania excelsa) 2.5 15" Washington palm 4.5 4" Norfolk Island pine 2.0 12" Queen palm (Syagrus romazoffiana) 4.0 8" Queen palm 3.0 14" Sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 3.0 8" Queen palm 2.5 16" Sabal palm 3.0 15" Sabal palm 3.5 16" Sabal palm 3.5 13" sabal palm 4.0 9" Queen palm 1.5 8" Queen palm 1.0 6" Chinese tallow (Sapium sebiferum) 1.0 8" Queen palm 2.0 11 Queen palm 3.0 12" Florida royal palm (Roystonea elata) 3.5 7" Coconut palm (Cocos nucifera) 3.0 <10' clear trunk 7" Queen palm 2.0 10" Live oak (Quercus virginiana) 3.5 9" Live oak 3.0 MAY 12 2005 ORIGINAL 28 10" Sabal palm 3.0 29 11 " Queen palm 3.0 30 10" Queen palm 3.0 31 9" Queen palm 2.5 32 12" Washington palm 3.5 33 9" Queen palm 3.0 34 9" Queen palm 3.0 35 13" Washington palm 3.5 36 10" Queen palm 3.0 37 12" Washington palm 3.5 38 9" Queen palm 3.0 39 10" Queen palm 3.0 40 14" Washington palm 3.5 41 14" Washington palm 3.5 42 12" Queen palm 3.5 43 8" Queen palm 3.0 44 8" Carrotwood (Cupaniopsis anacardioides) 2.0 45 10" Sabal palm 3.5 46 10" Sabal palm 3.5 47 8" Sabal palm 3.0 48 13" Sabal palm 3.5 49 14" Sabal palm 3.5 50 10" Sabal palm 3.0 ORIGINAL MAY 12 2005 a 0 51 12" Sabal palm 3.5 52 14" Sabal palm 3.5 53 8" Sabal palm 3.0 54 9" Sabal palm 3.0 55 8" Queen palm 2.5 56 13" Washington palm 3.0 57 13" Sabal palm 3.5 58 10" Sabal palm 3.0 59 9" Queen palm 3.0 60 6" Citrus spp. 2.0 61 6" Citrus spp. 2.0 62 16" Washington palm 4.5 63 <10' clear trunk 64 5" Robellini palm (Phoenix robellini) 3.0 65 11" Queen palm 4.0 66 7" Queen palm 3.0 67 8" Queen palm 3.0 68 <10' clear trunk 69 11" Washington palm 3.5 70 <10' clear trunk 71 <10' clear trunk 72 4",5" 6" Podocarpus (Podocarpus macrophyllus) 3.5 73 17" Sabal palm 5.0 MAY 12 2005 ORIGINAL 74 <10' clear trunk 75 <10' clear trunk 76 <10' clear trunk 77 <10' clear trunk 78 <10' clear trunk 79 <10' clear trunk 80 <10' clear trunk 81 <10' clear trunk 82 10" Queen palm 83 <10' clear trunk 84 <10' clear trunk 85 <10' clear trunk 86 <10' clear trunk 87 <10' clear trunk 88 <10' clear trunk 89 <10' clear trunk 90 <110' clear trunk 91 <10' clear trunk 92 <10' clear trunk 93 <10' clear trunk 94 <10' clear trunk 95 <10' clear trunk 96 <10' clear trunk r 3.0 MAY 12 2005 ORIGINAL • 97 12" Queen palm 1.0 98 14" Washington palm 3.0 99 <10' clear trunk 100 <10' clear trunk MAY 12 2005 ORIGINAL 0 0 MARABELLA CONDOMINIUMS FLS2003-12068 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA STORMWATER REPORT Revised May 11, 2005 Prepared By: Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 101 Philippe Parkway, Ste 205 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 MAY 12 2005 ORIGINAL P`C • ?? if .E..'NU. 48192. ?rl.? y•t1(, INDEX Project Overview .......................................... 1 Calculations ................................................. 2 Stage-Area-Storage Spreadsheet ...................... 3 MAY 12 2005 ORIGINAL 0 0 Project Overview ORIGINAL MAY 12 2005 • PROJECT OVERVIEW Description and Location • The Marabella Condominiums project is located in Section 7; Township 29S; Range 15E on Clearwater Beach. The stormwater project consists of three developed adjacent parcels (Parcel A=1.41 ac, Parcel B = 0.92 ac, and Parcel C = 0.03 ac) totaling 2.37 acres at the southern end of Clearwater Beach along Gulfview Blvd and Coronado Dr within the City of Clearwater, Florida. The proposed project consists of the new construction of two buildings for a total of 101 condominium units with an amenity package and associated parking along with two dry stormwater ponds. Existing Conditions The existing site contains paved parking and multi-family units totaling 80,981.43 ft2 of impervious area and some landscape areas. Currently, there is one small dry stormwater pond at the north end of Parcel A. Most of the stormwater runoff from the site sheet flows into the adjacent streets. According to the Pinellas County Soil Survey, the site soils consists of Made Land (Ma), primarily made up of mixed sands and shell fragments. Proposed Conditions The proposed project includes ultimately two buildings, sidewalks and paved driveways totaling 72,913 ft2 of impervious area, which is less than the precondition. Runoff will be directed via overland flow, swales and directional roof drains to the dry ponds located on the north sides of the two adjacent parcels for this project. The normally dry ponds will both provide treatment and the one along Gulfview Blvd will also provide attenuation. Due to the sandy soils at this location, treatment volumes should be recovered within hours after a storm event. Stormwater Criteria Per City of Clearwater, treatment volume within each of the ponds is provided for the each parcel. The pond for the north parcel, Parcel A, will also provide for attenuation for the City's attenuation requirements are for the 25 yr - 1 hr event with only 50% credit for existing impervious areas, i.e. C = 0.49 for existing runoff calculations. As stacking of attenuation volume over treatment volume is not required by the City, the treatment volume accounts is included in the attenuation volume as well. ORIGINAL MAY 122005 • • Calculations MAY 12 2005 ORIGINAL • CALCULATIONS l.) TREATMENT CALCULATIONS Parcel A: (1/2in) (lft/12in) (61212 ft2) = 2,550.50 CF = 2,550.56 CF Parcel B: (3/4in) (lft/12in) (40561 ft2) = 2,535 CF = 2,535 CF 2.) Freeboard provided: Parcel A: 6.0[top of bank]- 5.1 [treatment elev.] = 0.9 ft Parcel B: 6.0[top of bank]- 5.9[treatment elev.] = 0.1 ft • 4.) ATTENUATION CALCULATIONS FDOT Zone VI: Tc= 601V1ih, i = 3.7 in/hr Parcel A: Cexist = [(14214 sf)(.20) + (46998 sf)(.49)] / 61212 sf Cexist = 0.42 Cprop = [(41866 sf)(.98) +(4950 sf)(1.0) + (14396 sf)(.20)] / 61212 sf Cprop = 0.80 Delta Vol = Tc.i.A [Cprop-Cexist] = (lhr)(3.7 in/hr)(.80-.42)(1.40 ac)(3600 sec/hr) = 7086 CF ORIGINAL MAY 12 2005 • 0 Stage-Area-Storage Spreadsheet ORIGINAL MAY 12 M5 Stage-Storage Project Name: Project Number. Designer. Date: Comments: Marabella - Parcel B [346 04 _ Vicki Bass 2124/2005 - - ry [2124/i665 treatment vol =.2535 ft3 -. •_. _ ._ _. .. _ _? ._ .- ___. - -- -__-_ _ _. _ . ._ . _ Area @ Top of Bank(TOB): Area @ Design High Water(DHW)r Area @ Design Low Water(DLW): Area @ Bottom/Normal Water Level(BOT/NWL): (ft2) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ac-ft) 3;600.0 0:083 Elevation: 6.00 Volume: 2,914 0.067 3,590.5 0.082 Elevation: 6.00 Volume: 2,907 0.067 3,403:0 0.078 Elevation: 5.90 Volume: 2,582 0.059 285.4 0.007 Elevation: 4.50 Volume: 0 0:000 STAGE AREA VOLU ME STAGE AREA VOLU ME MY ac ft 3 ac-ft ff fe . ac ft3 ac-ft 4.50 ........ 285.4 ........................ 0.007 .......................... 0.0 ............. ................ 0.000 . 5.25 ------------------..... 1,942.7 ..--...................... 0.045 ..........---.-----..--... 835.5 ................... . ..... 0.019 . - _...4 :53 ....... ......351::6..... -----0:008..._.. ............................. ---0 :000.. -----....28...... ....2,009.0 0 046 . . . 894 $ .......... .--- 0 021. 4.56 417.9 0.010 21:1 0.000 .. 5.31 2,075 3 ........ ; ....-- 0.048 . ................ ...---- -------- : 956.0 .... ... .... ... : ---- 0.022 ._. 4.59.._.... -....4:.5.9 ...... 84.2 .. 0:011 ........ ....... ..x.6......... .... 0.001 . 5.34 ........................ 2,141.6 ....................... ... 0.049 ..... . . . . .............. 1,019.3 ................... 0.023 4.62 550.5 0:013 50.2 0.001 5.37 ....................... . 2,207.8 ...... ................... . .. ........... ..... 0:051 ....... ..... .... ... .... ....................... 1,084.5 ................... 0.025 .4.65....... .. 616.8 0.014 67.7 0.002 5.40 ....................... 2,274.1 .......................... . .. ... . 0.052 ....... ........... ... ............................ 1;151.8 . ... ................... 0.026 4.68 ....... ......683.1.... ......0.016.... 87.2 0.002 5.43....... ._.2,340:4... . .. .. -0.054•. . ...................... . - 1,22.1.0 ................... 0.028 4.71 749.4 0 017 108.6 0 002 5.46 2,406.7 0.055 ......... 1 292 2 .... ......... 0.030 .......... 4.74 ........ . ....815:7 ..... ......0.019 .... . . ............................. 1 32.1 -0:003 ... ' 5:49.... 2,473.0.... ..0.057 . 1,365.4 0.031 4.77 882.0 0.020 157.6 6 0:004 5.:52 2,539.3 ... ..... .. . ....... 0.058 .................... ..... ..................... 1,440.6 .. . ......... .......... .................... 0.033 ... . . ... --. 4:80 .. 948 ..... 8 ....3 ...... ......... 0................ ............• -- --•---••---: 0 ..................004 ... .. 5.......55....... 6 .......2,_........605.< 0.060 1 ,51.8 7 035 0 :0 .._..4 .83....... ....1,014.6... ...._0023 _.._ 214:5....._.. _.0:005 5.58 2,671.9 .. ..1 0.061 1,596.9 6 0.037 _ 4,86....... .... 1,080.9 .0 025 245:9 0.006 5.61 ........_.........°-- .. ... ........ 2,738.2 .... ..... ... .. .... .. .......................... 0.063 ... . ............... ........ 1,678:1 .................. 0.039 4.89....... ...1,147:2... 0.026.... 279:3....... 0006.... 5:64..._.. . .. . . . 2,804.5. . . .................... 0.064...... ..............._--------°- .....1,761..2... ................... -0.040 4:92....... .._1,213.5... 0 028 __ ___314 7._._._ 0 007 5.67 2,870 8 . 0 066 -----... 1846.3 ..................... .. 0 042 .......... 4,95 1,279.7 0.029 352.1 0.008 ... 5.70 ......... 2;937.1 .......................... 0.067 .................... . .. 1,9335 ... 0.044 4 :98 1,346 0. ....._0:031 391.5.... . 0.009 5.73 ....................... 3,003.4 .......................... .. . 0.069 .......................... ........................ 2,022.6 ......... ................... ................... 0.046 ................... 5.01 ....................... 1,412.3 ........................ 0.032 ......................... 432.9 ............................. 0.010 .. -........... . 5.76 ......... 3,069.7 0.070 2,1:13.7 0.049 5.04. 1,478.6 0.034 476.3 0.011 5:79 ....................... 3,135.9 ............. _........... . 0.072 .......................... 2,206.7 ........................... 0.051 ..... ............... 5:07 1,544.9 0.035 521.6 0:012 5.82 .................... ... 3,202.2 .... . . . 0.074 2,301.8 0:053 5:10 1,611.2 0.037 569.0 0.013 . 5.85 .. .......... ..... .. 3,268.5 .. ... .. ... .......................... 0.075 ... . .. ........................... 2,398.9 ................... 0.055 .5.13 1,677,5 .0.039 618.3 0.014 5.88 ..................... . • 3,334.8 .......................... . .... ... ..... 0.077 ---- --------------------- ....................... 2,497.9 ---------- --- ..... .... -- -- ........ 0057 ... . .. . 5.16 1,743.8 0;040 669:6_..._ 0.015 5.91 3,401.1 0.078 • -- .. . 2,599.0 . .... ..... ... 0.060 5:19 _..1,810.1 0.042 722:9 0.017 5.94 3,467.4 0:080 ................ .... .... ............ 2,702.0 -----........... ........... .................... 0.062 ...... ..... ...... 5.22 1,876.4 0.043 778.2 0.018 5.97 -- 3,533.7 ............... 0.081 ......................... • 2,807.0 ............................ . .. 0.064... . . ............. . 6.00 3,600.0 0.083 2914.0 0.067 0 7 1 DESIGN 233-02 TREATMENT VOLUME: 2;582 ft3 0.059 ac-ft '-C r.. A.D e ta is • • LuccaStageStorage B_022405 5111/20055:50 PM Staae-Storage Project Name; Marabelia - Parcel A Project'Number. :4_04 Designer: Vicki Hass Date; 2124/2005 Comments: treatment vol = 2550.50 ft3 (ft2) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ac-ft) Area @ Top of Bank(TOB): 6,634.0 0.152 Elevation: 6.00 Volume: 9,251 0.212 Area@ Design.High-Water(DHW): 5,930.0 0.136 Elevation: 5.70 Volume: 7,367 0:169 Area @ Design Low Water(DLW): 3,583.2 0.082 Elevation: 4.70' Volume: 216.10 0.060 Area@ Bottom/Normal Water Level(BOT/NWL): 767.0 0.018 Elevation: 3.50 Volumes 0 0.000 STAGE AREA VOLU ME STAGE AREA VOLU ME ft ft2 ac ft 3 ac-ft ft fe ac ft 3 ac-ft 3.50 767.0 ..... ' 0.018 ..-.... ................... OA .............. .•.--......... 0.000 ....... .............. 4.75 ........................ 3,700.5 ............. _........... 0.085 ................ -- -- 2,792.2 0.064 .......3.55 884.3 .... 0.020....... ... 41.3 0:001- 4.80 ........................ 3,817.8 .. --... - 0.088 ............................ 2,980.1 .................. .. 0.068 3:60....... ._.1,001.7 0.023 . . . . . .. . .. . . . 88.4 ... . . . ... 0.002 4.85 .. -- . ........................ 3,935.2 . . . . .......................... 0.090 ............................ 3,174.0 .................... 0.073 365....._. ._._1,119.0... 0.026 . . . . . . . .. . . 1.41.5.___.. . . . . . ....0.003... ..4.90 . . . . ........... 4;0525 ............ 0.093 _. - ----.......-.. 3,373.7 .................... 0077 3.70....... .... 1,236.4 0.028 200.3 0:005 4.95 ........................ 4169.9 ......... .................. 0.096 .......................... 3,579.2 ........... ................. 0.082 ...... ............. 75 3:.. . ....... . 1,353.7 ..... ............ 0.031 - 265.1 ----- 0.006 -- -- --- 5.00 4,287.2 . . .. _ 0.098 3,790.6 : : 0.0 87 86 3 . .1;471.0... ..._. ,0.034 ..... ........335.7:__._._ .......008 .. .........05_ . ... .. ............ 4;404.5 ... - - ........... 0.101 ....... . . •..--- --- ..... 4,007.9 _ 0 ......... 0:092 3 :$5 1,588.4 0 036 412.2 0 009 ............ 5.10 . .._ 4,521.9 .._.... ....._ 0.104 ____ . ... 1 4,231 ._. 0:097 3.90 1,705.7 0.039 494.5 0.011 5.15 4 ,639 .2 .. .. ... 0.107 . 4,4601 0.102 .......395.._.... .... ....... .:1 . ,823.1 .... ..... ....._0.042 ...... ........582:8 __.. 0.013 ... 5.20 --.2 . . ..... .... .. . 4,756.6 --- ... 0:109 0- 4,695.0 0.108 4:00 1,940.4 0.045 676.8: 0.01.6 5.25 ------------------------ 4;873.9 .............. ......... ............ 0.112 - ..................... ...... 4,935.8 .................... 0.113 4.05 .2,057.7 ......0..047 776.8 0.018 5.30 ............ .. . . . . 4,991.2 ........................ 0.115 ............................ 5,182.4 .................... 0.119 4.1.0 2,175.1 0.050 882.6 0.020 . . .... . 5:35 --..... ............ .......................... 5,108.6 .......................... ................ ....... 0.117 .......................... ........................... 5,434.9 ............................ ..... ............. 0.125 .................... 4.15 2,292.4 0.053 994.3 0.023 5.40 ....................... 5,225.9 ......................... 0.120 ......................... 5,693.3 ............................ 0.131 .................... 420 2,409.8 ...................... 0.055 . 1,111.9 0.026 5.45- 5,343.3 0.123 5,957.5 0.137 425 2,5271 • 0.058 112353 - ------ 0.028 5.50 5,460.6 0:125 6,227.6 0:143 4.30 2,644.4 0. 1 06 1364.6 0:031 5.5 5 5,577.9 0.128 6,503.6 0.149 4.35 2,761.8 0.063 1.,499.7 0.034 5:60 ................. ...... 5,695.3 .......................... 0.131 .......................... 6,785.4 ............................ 0.156 ................... 4 40 ......... 2,879.1 .... 0.066 ......... 1,640.8 .. . 0.038 5.65 5,812:6 ... 0.133 7,073.1 0.162 4.45 2,996.5 0.069 1_;787.6 0.041 5.70 ....................... 5,930.0 .......................... 0.136 ....... ............. 7,366.7 .... ......... .. .. . . 0.169 .. .4.50 3,113.8. ......0.071. 1,940.4 0.045 5.75 ....................... 6,047.3 ....... . . . 0.139 . . .. . .. .. 7,666.1 .................. 0.176 4.55 3,231.1 0.074 2,099.0 0.048 5:80 --------------------- ...... ..... ... .. 6,164.6 -------------------------- ....... .................. 0.142 ------- - --. . ............................ 7,971.4 .................... 0.183 4:60 3,348.5 0.077 2,263.5 0;052 5.85 ---------------------- 6,282.0 -------- - .......-- • 0.144 .-........................ ............................ 8,282.6 ............................ ................... 0.190 .................... .4:65....... .._3,465.8... .....0.080.... 2,433.9..... ..._0.056 --- -5.90....... ....6,399:3.... ......0.147 _8,599.6..... ...0.197 4.70 3,583.2 0 082 2,610.1 ----- 0..060.. . ... 5.95 .............. 6,516.7 ........................... 0 0.15 ................. ........ ,922.5 ............................ 205 6.00 6,634.0 0.152 9,251.2 0:212 LuccaStageStorageA_022405 5/11/20055:49 PM DESIGN 233-02 TREATMENT VOLUME: 2,610 ft3 0.060 ac-ft ATTENUATION VOLUME: 7,367 ft3 0.169 ac-ft M -AG rlop cn Q G-) l~ • ?AL? c 2/24/2005 , Receipt #: 1200500000000001266 1:55:58PM r Date: 02/24/2005 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2005-02021 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check LUCCA, INC jmc 3395 In Person 11205 Payment Total: $1,205.00 I THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.ipt Page I of 1 ORIGINAL I rf- iL ??? ?.1 2u(1? PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER FLD2005-02021 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Date Received: 02/24/2005 LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: UNK CLWCoverSheet PLANNER OF RECORD: wo D .-fJrl, 6) A'a W-07+ II r 2008 FEB qJ4MZ TER FIRE & RESCUE IV - T fl?JRE PREVENTION SERVICES N E I $`ri 0OVS 9 COMMUNUTY RESPONSE TEA114 MEMORANDUM To: From: CC: Date: Subj ect: Lenny Rickard, Bureau Chief, Assistant Fire Marshal Wayne Butler, Fire Inspector II Steve Strong, CFEI, CFII, Division Chief, Fire Marshal Shelby Brown, Code Inspector February 15, 2008 Cppy "Lucca Development", properties on Coronado & Hamden. Follow-up inspections: February 13, 2008 1. Bay Lawn Motel, 406 Hamden Last inspected on 6/26/07. Posted not to occupy because of the number of Life Safety Code violations. The structure has not been occupied since 6/26/07. The building continues to deteriorate with no repairs being done. Ceilings are falling in cased by water damage and the property is not secured. Fire Department recommendation: Disconnect power and gas, fence property until repairs are completed. 2. Tropicana Resort Motel, 350 Hamden 2 buildings. Last inspected 4/17/07. On 6/26/07 reinspected and Building Two posted no occupancy. Building One could be occupied only on the first floor after Life Safety Code violations are corrected. One unit continues to be occupied for security and managers unit as per Lucca Management. During inspection on 2/13/08, found no corrections made. Some units are not secured and the building continues to deteriorate. Fire Department recommendation: Disconnect power and gas, remove the one resident and fence the property for security. 1 .a Lenny Rickard, Bureau Chief, Assistant Fire Marshal Memo, 2/15/2008 Page 2 3. Albatross Motel, 346 Hamden Letter dated May 7, 2007 from owner Luke Castrogiovanni; the property is scheduled for development. Inspection on 2/13/08 found property has deteriorated since last inspection. Unit 105 not habitable. Ceiling fell in caused by roof leak. Unit 106 used for storage. Many electrical violations found not in compliance with NFPA 70 such as laundry room open 220 outlet, electric by fountain, open junction box, exposed connections for pool filter system, office light, burnt and shorted walkway lights. Walkway ceilings water damaged with electric lights. Smoke detectors required to be changed to electric power, resident in Unit 12 stated she removed the battery. Mr. Castrogiovanni was given ninety (90) days to replace the battery smoke detectors or secure a demo permit. The building has deteriorated from last inspection. Fire Department Recommendation: Disconnect power and utilities. Fence property or bring into code compliance- 4. Gulf Beach Motel, 419 Coronado Currently not occupied. Ceiling falling in. Electric violations. Fire Department Recommendation: Electric powered smoke detectors required. Turn gas off. Secure building. 5. Falcon Motel, 415 Coronado Unit 102 previous structure fire not repaired. Door to unit not secured. Some electric problems throughout structures. Railings must be brought into code compliance. The one building not occupied needs to be secured better. Gas stoves need to be serviced. Fire Department recommendation: Bring structures into code compliance. Lenny Rickard, Bureau Chief, Assistant Fire Marshal Memo, 2/15/2008 Page 3 6. Key Lime Motel, 405 Coronado Outside electrical problems. Verify smoke detectors powered by the house electrical service. Fire extinguishers out of date. Office area has exposed wires from previous ceiling fan. Fire Department recommendation: Bring into code compliance. 7. Vacant office building under renovations, 401 Coronado Appears no power to the building. All doors and windows secured. Does not pose any additional fire or Life Safety hazards. 8. Tri-plex, 345 Coronado Outside inspection only. No problem. Needs smoke detectors powered by the house electrical service. 9. 5 rental units, Roma Suites, 326 Coronado Fire extinguisher located outside Unit One needs inspection. Stairs to second floor unit could be brought into code compliance. Verify smoke detectors powered by the house electrical. Brown, Shelby From: Sent: To: Subject: 325 S. Gulfview 346 Hamden 350 Hamden 406 Hamden 422 Hamden 419 Coronado 415 Coronado 405 Coronado 401 Coronado 345 Coronado 326 Coronado Root, Dana Wednesday, February 20, 2008 12:33 PM Brown, Shelby LUCCA DEVELOPMENT Clearwater Beachview Resort Albatross Motel Tropicana Motel Bay Lawn Motel Gulf Beach Motel Gulf Beach Motel Falcon Motel Key Lime Motel vacant office-type building residential tri-plex 5 rentals units HOUSING CASE HOUSING CASE HOUSING CASE UNSAFE CASE HOUSING CASE HOUSING CASE HOUSING CASE REFER TO CODE ENFORCEMENT NO VIOLATIONS HOUSING CASE HOUSING CASE KEY LIME EXTERIOR SURFACES 1 OR 2 BROKEN WINDOWS/ COMMON PROBLEMS WITH THESE PROPERTIES: BROKEN MISSING/WINDOWS EXPOSED WIRING ROOF LEAKS DETERIORATING RAIL/STAIR SYSTEMS FALLING SOFFIT/STUCCO/DRYWALL STRUCTURAL DEFICIENCIES OF OUT BUILDINGS DANA :.,: .. ?' LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC - Property Sweep, February 2008 Address/Name Violations Bldg Dept CRT 325 S. Gulfview CW Beachview Resort yes housing case ABV 346 Hamden Albatross Motel yes housing case ABV I minor property maintenance 350 Hamden Tropicana Motel (east side) yes housing case property maintenance not open for business 406 Hamden Bay Lawn Motel yes unsafe case property maintenance not open for business 422 Hamden Gulf Beach Motel (east side) yes housing case ok at this time 419 Coronado Gulf Beach Motel (west side) yes housing case ok at this time 415 Coronado Falcon Motel yes housing case minor property maintenance 405 Coronado Key Lime Motel no ok at this time ok at this time 401 Coronado vacant restaurant building no ok at this time ok at this time 353 Coronado Tropicana Motel (west side) yes housing case property maintenance not open for business 345 Coronado residential tri-plex yes housing case ok at this time 326 Coronado Roma Suites yes housing case minor property maintenance Police Fire r? I ?C74 s II / Sf bf osr 5l bt fl zl l Ol 6 B L 9 S ?, 4 L?r z yr O ro fl tl rOL 9 L 6 z DLI I ? 11 it Z aoizt aay -La3w rot "D s l KLJU 9 IO 9l SL bl £t TE l ?+ t 01 6 B L 9 5 6 r6 B16 41ryr 0 L`i£ l" ? Otl IL aas `g $ °J a i:' g o Z m ` a Z _ ?° Y "d In ^ ' z it 9 r oL ryr 61L ^ L 'e f v a 4 7 $ ° OR er , : yr 1 L l v 3AR10 HAVAOLLHO" air oa L 91L 69.ur :N o? ffi o 3 k = N? :? n r 8 Ltra of Lll 29 Z4 f4 n S4 94 Lb 94 64 ?[ y, OS 15 ^' o y R` I? ZS 9ll err fS 4S 99 srr 9 O1 6 S L9 G LS aM res Sl 99 IOI-yp ore 9 < 4ll F tQddQLlCl?d d4 b L 99 a rf ear 7.L `ar ar ?e ? r f (U9 rar ea r V9 r Are 1 11 r C9 rZ O S s<r orr D t ers b as Z9 srr W 4 r<r sµ' 66 L are r arr 90 L9 rte l t sor QD L-2 09 eor „..,: Z OR I sor roe 90l " oa L - •. e roc or Sol . vu L e 6 O4 21, lp Zb f4 44 S4 4 15 W . 2 I L4 Ot161L L S z Me :0 M e loot 3AR10 Sq IS Me S ?a ul Z9 tAr OZI Bt BI Ll 9l q1 c} L O 1. d H b l £ l Z L ?ro ? ? <aa 7A I S ar eta Il $ a ?8t Pta ,. 's9.'I 9 00 ca Il £S B w L ? ? 66 arz ; . 9 os 0 O soa 96 4 k 1C 4 1# 1 0 ZS log !CZ b re ?" = a 09 y f ro g ?11L5 " "? ?Q? atrM 1`>Zlli z oe 00r 69 VA ZO/Z£ fD/Z£ u Y ? t< _ 'OAlB M3 tk) 010 °J w - - - N - - - - 6 B L 9 s r ^g ??? \\ S • 4 e 4 ?,y °4. \\ ?T S Q 1 +??S .r ?7i -7i7i ?D \\\ v' p ti, WHOD \\\ Isax 011V Cc, D P IA! 2008 IFEB qL", M?TER FIRE & RESCUE ,&I$, NO ys_'?q ? E f, RE PREVENTION SERVICES COMMUNITY K SPONSI TEAS! MEMORANDUM To: From: CC: Date: Subject Lenny Rickard, Bureau Chief, Assistant Fire Marshal Wayne Butler, Fire Inspector II - Steve Strong, CFEI, CFII, Division Chief, Fire Marshal Shelby Brown, Code Inspector February 15, 2008 tDop 11?? V "Lucca Development", properties on Coronado & Hamden. Follow-up inspections: February 13, 2008 1. Bay Lawn Motel, 406 Hamden Last inspected on 6/26/07. Posted not to occupy because of the number of Life Safety Code violations. The structure has not been occupied since 6/26/07. The building continues to deteriorate with no repairs being done. Ceilings are falling in cased by water damage and the property is not secured. Fire Department recommendation: Disconnect power and gas, fence property until repairs are completed. 2. Tropicana Resort Motel, 350 Hamden 2 buildings. Last inspected 4/17/07. On 6/26/07 reinspected and Building Two posted no occupancy. Building One could be occupied only on the first floor after Life Safety Code violations are corrected. One unit continues to be occupied for security and managers unit as per Lucca Management. During inspection on 2/13/08, found no corrections made. Some units are not secured and the building continues to deteriorate. Fire Department recommendation: Disconnect power and gas, remove the one resident and fence the property for security. i Lenny Rickard, Bureau Chief, Assistant Fire Marshal Memo, 2/15/2008 Page 2 3. Albatross Motel, 346 Hamden Letter dated May 7, 2007 from owner Luke Castrogiovanni; the property is scheduled for development. Inspection on 2/13/08 found property has deteriorated since last inspection. Unit 105 not habitable. Ceiling fell in caused by roof leak. Unit 106 used for storage. Many electrical violations found not in compliance with NFPA 70 such as laundry room open 220 outlet, electric by fountain, open junction box, exposed connections for pool filter system, office light, burnt and shorted walkway lights. Walkway ceilings water damaged with electric lights. Smoke detectors required to be changed to electric power, resident in Unit 12 stated she removed the battery. Mr. Castrogiovanni was given ninety (90) days to replace the battery smoke detectors or secure a demo permit. The building has deteriorated from last inspection. Fire Department Recommendation: Disconnect power and utilities. Fence property or bring into code compliance. 4. Gulf Beach Motel, 419 Coronado Currently not occupied. Ceiling falling in. Electric violations. Fire Department Recommendation: Electric powered smoke detectors required. Turn gas off. Secure building. 5. Falcon Motel, 415 Coronado Unit 102 previous structure fire not repaired. Door to unit not secured. Some electric problems throughout structures. Railings must.be brought into code compliance. The one building not occupied needs to be secured better. Gas stoves need to be serviced. Fire Department recommendation: Bring structures into code compliance. Lenny Rickard, Bureau Chief, Assistant Fire itilarshal Memo, 2/15/2008 Page 3 6. Key Lime Motel, 405 Coronado Outside electrical problems. Verify smoke detectors powered by the house electrical service. Fire extinguishers out of date. Office area has exposed wires from previous ceiling fan. Fire Department recommendation: Bring into code compliance. 7. Vacant office building under renovations, 401 Coronado Appears no power to the building. All doors and windows secured. Does not pose any additional fire or Life Safety hazards. 8. Tri-plex, 345 Coronado Outside inspection only. No problem. Needs smoke detectors powered by the house electrical service. 9. 5 rental units, Roma Suites, 326 Coronado Fire extinguisher located outside Unit One needs inspection. Stairs to second floor unit could be brought into code compliance. Verify smoke detectors powered by the house electrical. CLEARWATER FIRE & RESCUE DIVISION OF FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES MEMORANDUM To: Lenny Rickard, Bureau Chief, Assistant Fire Marshal From: Wayne Butler, Fire Inspector II ; CC: Steve Strong, CFEI, CFII, Division Chief, Fire Marshal Shelby Brown, Code Inspector Date: February 15, 2008 Subject: "Lucca Development", properties on Coronado & Hamden. Follow-up inspections: February 13, 2008 1. Bay Lawn Motel, 406 Hamden Last inspected on 6/26/07. Posted not to occupy because of the number of Life Safety Code violations. The structure has not been occupied since 6/26/07. The building continues to deteriorate with no repairs being done. Ceilings are falling in cased by water damage and the property is not secured. Fire Department recommendation: Disconnect power and gas, fence property until repairs are completed. 2. Tropicana Resort Motel, 350 Hamden 2 buildings. Last inspected 4/17/07. On 6/26/07 reinspected and Building Two posted no occupancy. Building One could be occupied only on the first floor after Life Safety Code violations are corrected. One unit continues to be occupied for security and managers unit as per Lucca Management. During inspection on 2/13/08, found no corrections made. Some units are not secured and the building continues to deteriorate. Fire Department recommendation: Disconnect power and gas, remove the one resident and fence the property for security. Lenny Rickard, Bureau Chief, Assistant Fire Marshal Memo, 2/15/2008 Page 2 3. Albatross Motel, 346 Hamden Letter dated May 7, 2007 from owner Luke Castrogiovanni; the property is scheduled for development. Inspection on 2/13/08 found property has deteriorated since last inspection. Unit 105 not habitable. Ceiling fell in caused by roof leak. Unit 106 used for storage. Many electrical violations found not in compliance with NFPA 70 such as laundry room open 220 outlet, electric by fountain, open junction box, exposed connections for pool filter system, office light, burnt and shorted walkway lights. Walkway ceilings water damaged with electric lights. Smoke detectors required to be changed to electric power, resident in Unit 12 stated she removed the battery. Mr. Castrogiovanni was given ninety (90) days to replace the battery smoke detectors or secure a demo permit. The building has deteriorated from last inspection. Fire Department Recommendation: Disconnect power and utilities. Fence property or bring into code compliance. 4. Gulf Beach Motel, 419 Coronado Currently not occupied. Ceiling falling in. Electric violations. Fire Department Recommendation: Electric powered smoke detectors required. Turn gas off. Secure building. 5. Falcon Motel, 415 Coronado Unit 102 previous structure fire not repaired. Door to unit not secured. Some electric problems throughout structures. Railings must be brought into code compliance. The one building not occupied needs to be secured better. Gas stoves need to be serviced. Fire Department recommendation: Bring structures into code compliance. i C 1 r Lenny Rickard, Bureau Chief, Assistant Fire Marshal Memo, 2/15/2008 Page 3 6. Key Lime Motel, 405 Coronado Outside electrical problems. Verify smoke detectors powered by the house electrical service. Fire extinguishers out of date. Office area has exposed wires from previous ceiling fan. Fire Department recommendation: Bring into code compliance. 7. Vacant office building under renovations, 401 Coronado Appears no power to the building. All doors and windows secured. Does not pose any additional fire or Life Safety hazards. 8. Tri-plex, 345 Coronado Outside inspection only. No problem. Needs smoke detectors powered by the house electrical service. 9. 5 rental units, Roma Suites, 326 Coronado Fire extinguisher located outside Unit One needs inspection. Stairs to second floor unit could be brought into code compliance. Verify smoke detectors powered by the house electrical. Brown, Shelby From: Sent: To: Subject: 325 S. Gulfview 346 Hamden 350 Hamden 406 Hamden 422 Hamden 419 Coronado 415 Coronado 405 Coronado 401 Coronado 345 Coronado 326 Coronado Root, Dana Wednesday, February 20, 2008 12:33 PM Brown, Shelby LUCCA DEVELOPMENT Clearwater Beachview Resort Albatross Motel Tropicana Motel Bay Lawn Motel Gulf Beach Motel Gulf Beach Motel Falcon Motel Key Lime Motel vacant office-type building residential tri-plex 5 rentals units HOUSING CASE HOUSING CASE HOUSING CASE UNSAFE CASE HOUSING CASE HOUSING CASE HOUSING CASE REFER TO CODE ENFORCEMENT NO VIOLATIONS HOUSING CASE HOUSING CASE KEY LIME EXTERIOR SURFACES 1 OR 2 BROKEN WINDOWS/ COMMON PROBLEMS WITH THESE PROPERTIES: BROKEN MISSING/WINDOWS EXPOSED WIRING ROOF LEAKS DETERIORATING RAIUSTAIR SYSTEMS FALLING SOFFIT/STUCCO/DRYWALL STRUCTURAL DEFICIENCIES OF OUTBUILDINGS DANA IT ;F } INS' ? .? ! alnli?iri ? ? - ?z Dlii„s 1) F! 71! T, I Wulf Niil lilt f IO a ,c ??r?ar i y.,, ut ^1 ! 325 S. Gulfview, "Clearwater Beachview Resort" . W, I. 346 Hamden, "Albatross Motel" F low 1 346 Hamden, "Albatross Motel" r 7 ti 960 MANIONN DR an 350 Hamden, "Tropicana Motel" . • I, 4c i?cs' i 353 Coronado, "Tropicana Motel" C 1 +.. ti , _y.. I" L41 ? •=- sl?iliy"'indifiltld s.. i i - !?NM 0" e0op"', I z 406 Hamden, "Bay Lawn Motel" A It Y AIM ' q At ?sw 406 Hamden, "Bay Lawn Motel" 1 " t 'tint 422 Hamden, "Gulf Beach Motel" c v 7 L 419 Coronado, "Gulf Beach Motel" 4 . 415 Coronado, "Falcon Motel" N it 415 Coronado, "Falcon Motel" u u „ ?° n TT FAL M "T MOTiL W,; ..._--- lliil s - -- - _ _ c? 405 Coronado, "Key ine Inn" t ??, ?;? Sgt AAW- 401 Coronado, vacant restaurant i 345 Coronado, tri-plex t, 'r -S 'R , 326 Coronado, "Roma Suites" 1,' , Y 326 Coronado, "Roma Suites" M Page 1 of 2 4 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:35 AM To: Clayton, Gina; Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca- Release the Parking Contingency FYI. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:54 AM To: Akin, Pam; Delk, Michael Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca- Release the Parking Contingency FYI. From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Tue 6/10/2008 9:41 PM To: markirealtor@hotmail.com Cc: Irwin, Rod; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Ehooperl@aol.com Subject: Re: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca- Release the Parking Contingency Mark As we said, all we need is a email from Rod Irwin to this effect and that the density from this site will be transferred to the Lucca across the street... Without the transfer of density we cannot proceed any further. Is getting an email from Rod Irwin as to what he told you a problem? We would also like the email from Rod Irwin to state that we were told to go through you and not directly with the city. This bit of confusion needs to be cleared up as well... As I told you, Luke is here tomorrow and once we have clarification in writing from Rod Irwin, Luke is ready to move forward... Joe In a message dated 6/10/2008 5:09:14 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, markirealtor@hotmail.com writes: Joe, At least we are headed in the right direction. My belief is that the City wants to purchase a piece of land unencumbered. The price would be given with or without the density. No contingicies. The City would need that in 6/12/2008 Page 2 of 2 r writing both from Luke and whoever else needs to be in the loop to allow it to happen. What I am saying is the receiver named would have to sign off on the deal. The City asked me to bring them all viable sites and would consider Luke's only if it is free and clear and signed off on by the FINAL decisionmakers. They have no appetite for anything else. I start meeting with Council members tomorrow and will keep it on the list if we can get to this goal QUICKLY. Thanks! mark Wm. MARK SEARCY CLEARWATER BEACH FLORIDAYS LATITUDE 27.9983/LONGITUDE -82.82785 >From: Hunraf@aol.com >To: marklrealtor@hotmail.com >CC: leslie.dougall-sides@Myclearwater.com, Ehooper1 @aol.com, >rod.lrwin@myclearwater.com, luke.luccainc@comcast.net >Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca- Release the Parking Contingency >Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:12:18 EDT >Mark >Luke just emailed me and told me that he will take out the contingency for >needing parking in the city garage and will work out his own parking in the >design of his new projects however he can. >Luke will be in town tomorrow and, contingent on him getting an email from >Rod Irwin telling him to do so, will sign your commission agreement to >present >his property for $4,500,000.00. >There will remain the contingency of transferring the density off of the >site to his other site (which, as I told you, the city agreed to before). >If >that is not an acceptable contingency then that would be a "deal killer." >Let me know what to do next. >Joe >**************Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best >2008. (http://citysbest.aol.com?ncid=aolacg00050000000102) Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best 2008. 6/12/2008 0 0 4 Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 1:16 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Mr. Castrogiovanni Letter #2 FYI -----Original Message----- From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 1:04 PM To: Silverboard, Jill; Akin, Pam Cc: Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Horne, William; Irwin, Rod; Andrews, Wayne; Geer, Jamie; Strong, Steve; Bates, Dan; Brown, Shelby; Klein, Sidney; Williams, Dewey; Teunis, Mark; Steffens, James; Lopez, Perry; Lopez, Geraldine Campos; Quillen, Michael; Butler, Wayne; Rickard, Leonard; Soto, Camilo; Garriott, Kevin; Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Mr. Castrogiovanni Letter #2 Letter sent - see attached - thanks Leslie, JiII and Shelby for your help on this Finance representatives/attorney advised that they will draw up an agreement with Mr. Castrogiovanni that clearly meets expectations outlined by the City - within a reasonable time frame. They also asked for the process line items for demolishing a building. We will provide them with a reasonable time table and steps as requested. Mr. Burdette stated that his client/owner will meet the conditions outlined in the letter but has questions on "Density Rights".... Thanks to all for your support and interest on these projects - Jeff Subject: Documentl Docl.doc 4 April 21, 2008 Mr. Luke Castrogiovanni 9011 South Natoma Avenue Oak Lawn, Illinois 60453 RE: Follow up to our meeting on March 19, 2008 referencing our Notice of Consequences Stemming From Willful Disregard of Public Nuisance Conditions at the following properties: Clearwater Beachview Resort Albatross Motel Tropicana Resort Motel Bay Lawn Motel Gulf Beach Motel Key Lime Motel Gulf Beach Motel Falcon Motel Residential Tri-Plex Roma Suites Dear Mr. Castrogiovanni, 325 South Gulfview Avenue 346 Hamden Drive 350 Hamden Drive 406 Hamden Drive 422 Hamden Drive 405 Coronado Drive 419 Coronado Drive 415 Coronado Drive 345 Coronado Drive 326 Coronado Drive Consistent with our letter dated March 19th. 2008, which was hand delivered to you on said date at a meeting with City Staff, we agreed that all life safety/health/welfare violations shall be brought into compliance no later than April 4, 2008 and all other violations brought into compliance no later than April 20, 2008. We acknowledge that you have made some effort to address a variety of code violations and appreciate your attention to those matters. However, the compliance dates have now lapsed and we find the following issues still outstanding: *Sec9d&-_ feadMRot-insta/led.?**Starr. ai/inQS.F?:bui/diva/bousina.issues- -- - - - **Clearwater Beachview Resort 325 South Gulfview Avenue * Albatross Motel * Tropicana Resort Motel * Bay Lawn Motel **Gulf Beach Motel **Gulf Beach Motel **Falcon Motel 346 Hamden Drive 350 Hamden Drive 406 Hamden Drive 422 Hamden Drive 419 Coronado Drive 415 Coronado Drive 1 These remaining issues/violations along with others we have discussed, must be brought into compliance immediately. All respective licensing, contractors, permits, inspections, etc. must be adhered to as we monitor your action plan to bring these matters of mutual concern to closure. Conditions existing at the Baylawn, Tropicana and Albatross Motels are such that we are recommending a demolition schedule within reasonable timelines to be clearly outlined and included as part of your overall properties compliance action plan. Please note that we have passed the threshold of working through "education, communication and cooperation". Specifically, most of these properties have been vacant/abandoned for months. The quality of life and sense of place for surrounding properties has been negatively impacted by the blighted/deplorable conditions of your properties. Service calls from a variety of City Departments continue to be taxed as we respond to a wide variety of nuisance related calls (see letter from March 19, 2008). City Code Section 3-1503.B.2. states: "Buildings which are abandoned, boarded up for a period of six months, partially destroyed for any period of time, or left for a period of three (3) months in a state of partial construction are declared to be a public nuisance': In other words, simply securing and fencing these properties will not prevent the City from continuing with its compliance efforts. The City of Clearwater will continue to move forward with enforcement alternatives to meet all life safety/health/welfare codes/conditions. Notification will be forthcoming as to the violation charges, dates, times, etc. Your immediate and complete response to these issues/violations are key to the legal action either moving forward or stopped as a result of compliance being met. Sincerely, Jeff Kronschnabl, Director Development & N- eighborhoodservices City of Clearwater, Florida Cc: I Star Financial See Attachment: Letter from March 19, 2008 e" 40, Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:16 AM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne Cc: Clayton, Gina; Treuhaft,. Linda Subject: RE: GM07-9216B-009: RE: Marbella Project - 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. IblNumAttach: 0 MessageGUID: {A79AEOA5-FC13-49B8-8524-OC2E6A56CABB} OriginalDate: None Originator: SQL Style: Lucca Marbella South Beach Parking Garage proposal Wayne - Proceed accordingly. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:14 AM To: Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne Cc: Clayton, Gina; Treuhaft, Linda Subject: GM07-92168-009 : RE: Marbella Project - 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. I concur, based upon the facts set forth below. The Minor Revision Development Order did not amend the required time frame to submit for permits, nor does its issuance initiate an additional time period within which to obtain permits. -----Original Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:28 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Clayton, Gina; Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: Marbella Project - 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. Wayne - Barring any opinion of a legal nature from Leslie to the contrary, I consider the DO as it relates to the primary residential parcel of the development plan to have expired. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Mess From: Sent: To: Delk, Michael Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: Michael - ige----- Wells, Wayne Tuesday, April 22, 2008 3:37 PM Marbella Project - 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. I do not see where I ever got a response to. this email. What would you (and/or Leslie) opine? Wayne • -----Original Message ----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 2:27 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Molter, Molly Subject: Marbella Project - 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. Michael - Molly brought to my attention after she was researching the above address to answer customer questions that it appears the Development Order for the residential project has expired. Following are the actions approved for this property: 1. On July 19, 2005, the CDB approved Case Nos. FLD2005-02021 /TDR2005-03020/PLT2005-0001 0 with 15 conditions of approval (Development Order dated July 21, 2005) to permit a total of 102 attached dwelling units (92 units on Parcel A and 10 units on Parcel B). An amended Development Order was issued June 16, 2006, to reflect the two years granted by the CDB to submit for a building permit (was in original D.O. as Condition #2). Under both of these Development Orders, a building permit to construct the proposed improvements was to be submitted no later than July 19, 2007. 2. A Time Extension Development Order for Case Nos. FLD2005-02021 /TDR2005-03020/PLT2005-0001 0 was issued by the Planning Director on March 13, 2007, granting an additional six months to January 19, 2008, to submit for a building permit. 3. On August 13, 2007, a Minor Revision Development Order was issued for Case Nos. FLD2005- 02021/TDR2005-03020/PLT2005-00010 with 13 additional conditions of approval to permit basically the relocation of all 10 dwelling units on Parcel B to Parcel A, so that all 102 dwelling units would be on Parcel A. 4. On August 21, 2007, the CDB approved Case No. FLD2007-06020 with 14 conditions of approval to permit the addition of a parking garage for 377 parking spaces (including 300 public parking spaces) on Parcel B to a previously approved project of 102 dwelling units. The first two conditions of this Case No. FLD2007-06020 stated "That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City;" and "That all prior conditions of approval under FLD2005-02021 by the CDB and under the Minor Revision are still applicable, except as modified through this application approval;" All conditions of approval on this case related. to the parking garage only, except conditions #5 and #6 dealing with the need to record a Unity of Title (for condominiums) and the need to record a condominium plat. This case was not approved with any greater time frame to submit a building permit to construct the garage building than normal code (one-year time frame to August 21, 2008). 5. The Staff Report for Case No. FLD2007-06020 stated "The approvals granted for the development of the 102 attached dwellings on Parcel A will not be affected." 6. There was no request submitted to request the CDB to extend the time frame approved by the Planning Director under the original approval for Case Nos. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005-00010 (see #2 above). There was no agenda item on the January 1515, 2008, CDB agenda for any time extension for the residential project approved under Case Nos. FLD2005-02021 /TDR2005-03020/PLT2005-00010 Based on the above, it appears that the original approval for the residential project under Case Nos. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005-03020/PLT2005-00010 has now expired and become void. It is unclear if the applicant was erroneously thinking that the approval granted under Case No. FLD2007-06020 reset the clock for the residential project to the approval time frames for the parking garage addition. Please advise. Wayne 7 • ? Page 1 of 3 4 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 8:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca Property FYI. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director . City of Clearwater, Florida-'*, myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 4:13 PM To: Delk, Michael; Garriott, Kevin Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca Property -----Original Message----- From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 3:33 PM To: Silverboard, Jill Cc: Akin, Pam; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Horne, William Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Lucca Property FYI - -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 3:20 PM To: Kronschnabl, Jeff Cc: luke.luccainc@comcast.net; Ehooperl@aol.com _._-Subject:,Joe.Burdette.=.Re:.Lucca. Property--- 618 Pineland Ave Belleair, Florida, 33756 4/25/2008 Jeff Kronschnable Director Development & Neighborhood Services City of Clearwater, Florida 0 Page 2 of 3 Re: Letter of April 21, 2008 - numerous properties, Clearwater Beach Jeff I am in receipt of your letter of April 21, 2008 and have discussed it with Luke Castogiovanni of Lucca Development and would ask your consideration for the following time line to either demolish or bring into compliance all of the properties that are a subject of the April 21, 2008 letter. First, it is Lucca's plan to keep open the following hotels: A. The Roma B. The Beach View C. Key Lime D. The Falcon E. The triplex located at 345 Coronado. F. Backstreet Cafe. This is currently closed and will be used for offices for the development company. We plan to reopen in the early fall. Lucca believes those units to now be in substantial compliance and if they are not they will be made totally compliant by May 1, 2008. Lucca intends to demolish the following hotels: A. Tropicana B. Albatross C. Bay Lawn D. Gulf Beach. These properties are having a security fence installed around them beginning today and the fence _ should be comple_ tein a day or two. Lucca will,_screw the windows.and,doors_shut,and,the.pools.have--- ------ T all been drained. All of the units to be demolished are thought to contain asbestos. In order to begin any demolition, there will need to be an asbestos survey done and literally hundreds of samples taken and sent to the laboratory for testing. It will take some time to bid and hire a environmental company to do this work. I would think about a month, as they will all have to inspect the properties prior to giving Lucca a bid price. I would suggest that this process will take to. June 1 to complete.. After the asbestos survey is complete, an asbestos removal plan must be prepared for approval by the County for air quality control and by EPA. This is about a 6-week process taking us to the middle of July or so. Once the asbestos removal plan has been approved the bids for actually removing the asbestos can go out. All of the bidders will want to visit the site prior to bidding so I would suggest that this is another 4/25/2008 7 Page 3 of 3 30 day process taking us to the middle of August. Once the asbestos removal has begun, I would think it could be completed in about 6-weeks (depending on the extent of the asbestos has determined by the asbestos survey mentioned above) and should be completed around September 30. Following the asbestos removal Lucca would be in a position to begin demolition of the properties. There is a 10 day "notice" period required before beginning any demolition so Lucca could begin demolition on or about Oct 15. There are a couple of issues that need further consideration. Most importantly is that Lucca is planning on submitting a plan to construct two hotels on his 3.67 acres. He would be submitting plans for such construction as soon as the city receives its approvals back from DCA and has second reading on the density ordinance the council passed at its last meeting. As Lucca really has no control of exactly when this might occur, his non-conforming density units that he currently has become problematic. If he demolishes the buildings there are two problems. The first problem is that the properties to be demolished have non-conforming units that Lucca needs to keep for his future projects. I don't think this is a big issue, but would like to discuss this with you further. The second problem is that if the new density ordinance does not get passed by DCA or on second reading, Lucca will then want to renovate the units rather than demolish them. We should know all of this by July or August and should not affect us between now and then as Lucca will be dealing with asbestos issues during that time. I hope these time tables are acceptable to you. Should you have any questions please give me a call and I will be glad to come in and sit down with you at your convenience. Thanks for your help Joe Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos. 4/25/2008 • • ayne Wells, Wayne Monday, August 13, 2007 1:29 PM Joe Burdette (E-mail) Cc: Watkins, Sherry; Elliott, Gayle; Delk, Michael Subject: Marbella - Minor Revision Joe - Attached is a Development Order for the Minor Revision to the Marbella project. I am placing the original letter up front at the greeter station in our offices for your pickup (thought you might like to pick it up rather than sending it through the mail). NOW...I need 15 copies of the revised Minor Revision plans submitted to be collated into the packages for the CDB. These 15 copies I need no later than noon on Wednesday, August 15, 2007. 1 also need someone to come to our offices to collate all the submittals into 15 packages (preferably when the Minor Revision plans are delivered, but no later than Wednesday afternoon), as this was not done previously, and we do not want the responsibility to determine the correctness of information (applicant's responsibility and effort). Other than the Minor Revision plans, it appears we have everything here, but everything needs to be collated into the packages. We will be happy to provide a location in our offices to collate everything. Call or email me if there are any problems. Wayne C Gulfview S 15 Minor Revisic C ITY OF C LEAR A'TFR POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ?- ',i MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 ?`?ly !6! TELEPHONE (427) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 13, 2007 Mr. Joe Burdette 618 Pineland Avenue Belleair, FL 33756 Re: Development Order - Minor Revision Case Nos. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005-03020/PLT2005-00010 325 S. Gulfview Boulevard (including 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 346 and 350 Hamden Drive) Dear Mr. Burdette: On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 15 conditions the above referenced case, which was a request for Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with an increase in height from 30' to 148' for Parcel "A" (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck); an increase in height of a parapet wall from 30" to seven feet (7') for Parcel "B"; to permit a building within the required sight visibility triangle along Coronado Drive and 51h Street; and an increase in height from 30' to 64' for Parcel "B" (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C.; a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist (T) District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C; Preliminary Plat; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005- 03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. A proposal has been submitted to revise the approved project with the following: • Relocate the 10 dwelling units approved on Parcel B to Parcel A, so that Parcel A will have all 102 dwelling units approved under the original application; and • Parcel B will only have accessory parking located on it, the balance between the amount of parking provided on Parcel A and that necessary to provide overall required parking for the 102 dwelling units at a rate of two parking spaces per unit (total of 204 spaces). In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be a Minor Revision and are APPROVED with the following additional conditions that must be addressed on the site, landscape and building plans for building permits: 1. All conditions of approval from the CDB approval on November 16, 2004, are still in effect; 2. Nothing in this Minor Revision approval includes any review by the Building and Fire Departments. All revisions must comply with Building and Fire Codes; 3. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the survey and civil site plans shall show the FEMA flood zones; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER Aeft "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER'S ? n a1 August 13, 2007 Burdette - Page 2 4. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil site and landscape plans shall be revised to reflect the modifications approved under this Minor Revision; 5. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, the civil site plan and Sheet A1.01 shall be revised to show the proposed setbacks from all property lines to all points of the building, including the portico on the west side of the building; 6. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, revise Sheet A1.01 on the west side of the building north of the ramp to the second level to show the lobby and exit corridor from Stair Core E to match that shown on Sheet A2.01, with a sidewalk connector outside the building under the portico to the main sidewalk to South Gulfview Blvd.; 7. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, revise Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 to accurately show the openings in the parking garage walls, gratings and columns; 8. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, revise Sheet A2.02 to remove signs and/or mirrors for or adjacent to parking spaces 257, 259 and 260; 9. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, revise Sheet A2.03 to provide a sign and mirrors for or adjacent to parking space 357 to aid motorists when backing out; 10. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, revise Sheet A2.04 to show the non-usable windows for the spa area on this sheet (as shown on Sheet A3.02; 11. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil and landscape plans shall be revised for Parcel B revised to show a minimum of 17 accessory parking spaces for the 102 dwelling units on Parcel A, with the parking lot meeting required setbacks and the design acceptable to Planning Staff. Any reductions below required setbacks shall be reviewed and approved by the CDB; 12. Trash dumpsters from the center and northern trash rooms on the east side of the first floor shall not be rolled to the trash staging area on the south side utilizing the public sidewalk in the Coronado Drive right-of-way; and 13. The maximum building height from BFE to the roof deck cannot exceed 148'-0" on Parcel A. Time frames to submit building permits to construct the site improvements are still applicable as previously approved and have not changed with this Minor Revision. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4504 or wane wells6Dmyclearwater.com. Sincerely, ------------ Michae A P Planning Direc r S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationsIGulfview S 0325 Lucca Development (7) 2005 - ApprovedlGulfview S 0325 Minor Revisions Development Order 8.13.07.doc 6 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Hunraf@aol.com Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 1:52 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Joe Burdette - Marbella Minor Amendments Wayne The Marbella drawings were delivered back to you today at noon... just making sure you saw them Joe Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com. 8/9/2007 ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 09 2007 /Jf& ( PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER GROUND ENGINEERING FLD2005-02021 - MARBELLA - MINOR REVISIONS NECESSARY Responses August 9, 2007 Wayne Wells, AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 27) 562-4504 Mr. Wells, Please find responses below to the Minor Revision comments from your office dated July 16, 2007. Please find revised drawings under cover as well. Don't hesitate to contact Ground Floor if you require anything further thanks. 1. Nothing in this review and pending approval includes any review by the Building and Fire Departments. All revisions must comply with Building and Fire Codes. Old 2. 7/13/07 - WW Indicate on Sheet A1.01 the VE flood zone. 4/19/07 - WW First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - None of the original civil or architectural plans or the survey indicate the affected FEMA flood zones on the property. Based on a review with Doug King in our Engineering Department, the site (Parcel A) is located within various Velocity Flood Zones. Based on FEMA requirements, only storage may occur below BFE. Need to show on the plans the FEMA flood zone lines. Revised, See note on Site flan. 3. Condition of Approval of the Minor Revision: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the survey and civil site plans shall show the FEMA flood zones. Revised. 4. Condition of Approval of the Minor Revision: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil site and landscape plans shall be revised to reflect the modifications approved under this Minor Revision. Devised.. 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee I FL 34761 800-738-0525 1 407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com I CA# 26018 RECEIVED 0 9 AUG 09 2007 5. 7/16/07 - WW PIANNING DEPARTMENT OIrY OF CL WATER Sheet A1.01 - Indicate ALL proposed setbacks to ALL property lines. Only the setback to the norttast corner has been indicated. 4/19/07- WW First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Show proposed setbacks to property lines. Cannot encroach any more than what the CDB approved plan indicated. To this end, it is noted that on the north side, north of Stair Core G, the storage areas and balconies extend westward farther west of the Stair Core G than indicated on the approved CDB plans (see column at R7/8). Based on the civil plans and Sheets A1.01 and A2.01 of the original plans approved by the CDB showing the slight angle of the property in relation to the proposed building, it appears this new building extension will encroach greater than the 15 feet shown on the plans approved by the CDB. Response: See revised. A .01 all setbacks re dimensioned. 6. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A1.01 - Show the following revisions: a. On the north side on the Coronado Drive side, show a north/south sidewalk connector to the stairs to the fire command room. The sidewalk from Stair Core G does not need to go straight out to Coronado Drive, but can turn and go south to the sidewalk from the adjacent lobby, removing excess sidewalk and creating additional landscape area; Response: Sep revised - a b. In the center on the Coronado Drive side, the sidewalk from Stair Core B does not need to go straight out to Coronado Drive, but can turn and go north to the sidewalk from the adjacent lobby, removing excess sidewalk and creating additional landscape area; Response: See revised plan c. On the south side on the Coronado Drive side, show a north/south sidewalk connector from the trash room to the trash staging area; Response: See revis( l d. On the south side on the Coronado Drive side, show a sidewalk connector from Stair Core A out and turning the building corner to link up with the trash staging area; R sponse: See .-w : ed e. On the west side of the building north of the ramp to the second level, revise the lobby and exit corridor from Stair Core E to match that shown on Sheet A2.01, with a sidewalk connector outside the building under the portico to the main sidewalk to South Gulf view Blvd.; and Response: See r°evisc d f. On the west side of the building south of the ramp to the second level, revise the lobby and exit corridor from Stair Core D to match that shown on Sheet A2.01, also revising to show the storage room adjacent to the west side of the building with no exterior door. Rcsponse: See revised :Plan 4/19/07 - WW First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Show all sidewalks from the building egress points (lobbies, stairs and trash rooms) to the sidewalk within the adjacent rights-of-way. 7. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A1.01 - The response indicates the center and northern trash rooms are only for the storage of trash. However, based on the floor plans starting with A2.04, there are trash chutes from the upper floors allowing residents to drop their trash into the chute that lands in the trash room on the ground floor. My guess is there will be a dumpster in these ground floor trash rooms that will be relocated when full to place an empty dumpster under the chute, and that the trash will not just land on the floor of 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 Ocoee I FL 34761 800-738-0525 1 407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com I CA# 26018 the trash rooms. It is further my assumption that these full dumpsters will be rolled to a trash staging area to be picked up by the trash truck. It is still a question as to how, if the only trash staging area is on the south side of the property, the dumpsters from the northern and center trash rooms will get to this designated trash staging area. Alternately, the parking spaces adjacent to and parallel with Stair Core F and C should be removed and the exterior doors to these trash rooms should be removed and relocated to the inside of the building so that the dumpsters can be rolled internally to the southern trash room to exit the building to the trash staging area. This would remove two parking spaces from Parcel A, requiring two additional spaces on Parcel B for the residential project. 4/19/07 - WW First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - There are three trash rooms indicated fronting Coronado Drive. For intent clarification, is the southern trash staging area, as shown on the approved CDB plan, the only pickup point for dumpsters? If so, why then do the middle and northern trash rooms have doors facing Coronado Drive? How will the dumpsters get to the southern trash staging area? Or, is it the intent to have three trash staging areas? Response: We created additional side walk area so that the bins could be rolled for 20' along exterior of the building, on this property, then enter back into the building thru sen. 4ce doors and then roll thru parking garage to enter rear of staging; area. From there the trash will be picked up by local m..unicipality. 8. Sheet A2.01 - Dimension the width of the handicap walk aisle for Space 136. Revised. 9. Sheet A2.01 - Two problems exist with the handicap parking. A door opens into the accessible aisle for parking space 135 and a wall partially obstructs the exit from the accessible aisle from parking space 136. Suggestions to improve these situations include 1) relocating the aisle for parking space 136 to the east side of that space and extending it to intersect with the aisle for space 138 and 2) relocating parking space 135 to the location currently occupied by space 122 and marking an accessible aisle for this space that would extend across the drive aisle and connect with space 136. Response.- see revised plan 10. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.01 - Installation of safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly are still needed for parking spaces numbered: 105, 112, 138, 139, 142 and 143. Signs to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces must still be installed for parking spaces 101, 103, 105, 112, 142, 143, 159 and 161. 4/19/07 - WW Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 112, 141, 142, 145, 146, 164, 165, 166 and 167. In addition to mirrors to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces, signs must be installed stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" for these parking spaces. Revised. 11. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.01 - Revise the number of parking spaces in the Legend from 55 to 56 and the number handicap spaces from 5 to 4. 4/19/07 - WW Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Amend the parking number counts in the Legend. ORIGINAL Revised. RECEIVED AUG 0 9 2007 10125 W. Colonial Drive[ Suite 212 1 Ocoee I FL 34761 800-738-0525 1 407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com I CA# 26018 ILANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 12. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.01 - The response indicates openings have been added to the drawing. I don't see any material change in the drawing from the previously submitted drawing. Solid walls are the same designation as walls with openings. If there are to be openings in the wall. with a grating in the arched area, some of the columns indicated on Sheet A2.01 interfere with the arches. Response: The Grills will be on outer face of the Columns or External Falls. 4/19/07 - WW Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revise. Response: We added the Openings and the Grills based on 1.1"levations oil floor plans. 13. Sheet A2.02 - For the handicap space to the left of the ramp, properly dimension the width of the handicap space and the walk aisle. For the handicap space to the right of the ramp, dimension the width of the handicap walk aisle. Revised. 14. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.02 - Installation of safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly are still needed for parking spaces numbered: 201, 209, 235 and 236. Signs to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces must still be installed for parking spaces 201 and 209. Staff did not request signs or mirrors for or adjacent to parking spaces numbered: 256, 257, 258, 259 or 260 (remove signs and/or mirrors). 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A2.02 - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 201, 209, 235 (if wall is installed as part of ramp), 238 (if wall is installed as part of ramp), 258 and 266. In addition to mirrors to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces, signs must be installed stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" for these parking spaces. Revised. 15. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.02 - These trash rooms should rather be designated as storage, since the trash chute goes to the first floor, not into this room. 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A2.02 - The trash rooms in front of Spaces 258 and 266 are inaccessible due to the location of the doorway and the abutting parking spaces. Revise. Revised. 16. Sheet A2.02 - While the response indicates openings have been added to the drawing, I don't see any material change in the drawing except at the open portico area. This comment should be broadened to the first, second and third floors where there are arched openings in the walls with a grating in the arched areas. The elevations show such openings, but there are columns at appear to interfere with these openings as drawn, making the accuracy of the elevations questionable. This is applicable to all elevations where such openings are shown. 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A2.02 - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall above the portico (windows/doors) and for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revise. Response: We added the openings and the ;gills on floor plans. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee I FL 34761 AUG 09 2007 800-738-0525 1 407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com I CA# 26018 BANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 17. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.03 - Installation of safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly are still needed for parking spaces numbered: 301 and 309. Signs to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces must still be installed for parking spaces 301 and 309. Staff did not request signs or mirrors for or adjacent to parking spaces numbered: 357, 358, 359, 361 or 362 (remove signs and/or mirrors). 4/19/07 - WW First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 301, 309, 358 and 366. In addition to mirrors to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces,' signs must be installed stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" for these parking spaces. Revised. 18. Sheet A2.03 - The trash room and lobby in front of Spaces 332, 341 and 342 are inaccessible due to the location of the doorways and the abutting parking spaces. Revise similar to that shown on Sheet A2.02. Revised. 19. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.03 - See comment #16 above. 4/19/07 - WW First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall above the portico (windows?) and for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revised. 20. 7/16/07 - WW Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - While a legend has been added and the color numbers added to the elevations, it is not extremely understandable. Provide color samples/chips for the proposed exterior color scheme. Unless you desire at this time to provide a color rendering for both the east and west elevations that will illustrate visually the proposed color scheme, such will be a condition of approval of this Minor Revision to be provided prior to the issuance of the building permit. 4/19/07 - WW Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - Indicate the exterior materials and colors on the plans. Provide color samples/chips for the proposed exterior color scheme. Revised. 21. 7/16/07 - WW Sheets A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 - Your response states you have reduced the proposed height shown at 150 feet to the CDB approved height of 148 feet. However, reviewing the dimensions on the side of the elevations, Levels 1, 2 and 4 - 16 remain the same. Only Level 3 has changed from a floor- to-floor height of 10'-6" to 9'-0", which according to my math is 1'-6" of difference, not the two-foot difference necessary. Revise. 4/19/07 - WW Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - Building height approved by CDB is 148 feet. Proposed height is now 150 feet. Section 4-406.A.8 does not allow an increase to the height of the building as a Minor Revision. Either reduce to 148 feet to remain under the consideration as a Minor Revision or need to file a new FLD application to increase the building height for potential approval by the CDB. Revised. 22. Sheets A2.04, A2.05, A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 - Revisions have been made on Levels 1 - 3 between Station Points Q - R and 9.2 - 5.8 due to potential issues with setbacks thalotteMalso REGENED 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee I FL 34761 800-738-0525 1 407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com I CA# 26018 AUG 09 2007 -PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 0 apparently forced changes to Levels 4 - 13 for Unit H by removing a balcony off the casual dining and master bedroom. I am not trying to design for you, but it would seem that some type of cantilevered balcony, maybe not extending as far from the main wall as previously, would be a selling point for Unit H (whereas Unit B still has a nice terrace). Revised.. 23. Sheet A3.01 - The balcony and pergolas shown for the units on Level 13 on the north and south sides are really for the units on Level 14. Revise Levels 13 and 14. Revised. 24. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A3.02 now shows non-usable windows for the spa area on this sheet, but such non-usable windows are not reflected on Sheet A2.04. Revise Sheet A2.04. 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A3.02 - On Level 4, the elevation for the spa area is not drawn correctly. Windows and railings for balconies are shown where there are none. However, as a blank wall, why can't there be some windows (could be non-usable). Revised. 25. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A3.02 - On Level 14, the floor plan indicates a roof. This roof may appear to be a flat roof with slope lines for drainage to roof drains. If this is true and there are parapets for these flat roof areas, then the elevations should show a line/band at the parapet height from the terrace over to the windows for Units C and G. 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A3.02 - On Level 14, the floor plan for this floor indicates a roof on either side of the "courtyard", yet the elevation shows a blank wall. Revise. Revised. 26. 7/16/07 - WW See comment #22 above. 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A3.04 - There appears to be a column on the balcony of Unit H for Levels 4 - 13 not shown (see Sheets A2.04 and A2.05). Revised. 27. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A3.04 - Pergola should be shown on Level 14 (same as shown on Sheet A3.03). 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A3.04 - There should be pergolas shown on the right side of Level 14 and in the middle for Level 15. Revised. 28. 7/16/07 - WW Response is insufficient. Provide the calculations for the north, south, east and west elevations. 4/19/07 - WW Provide documentation that at least 60 percent of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. ORIGINAL Revised. Sep: Elevation sleets. RECEIVED 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee I FL 34761 AUG 09 2007 800-738-0525 1 407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com I CA# 26018 MANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 29. Based on 102 units in this building on Parcel A, a parking requirement of two sl parking counts on Sheets A2.01, A2.02 and A2.03, there are 187 parking spac( Parcel A. As the requirement for the 102 units is 204 total parking spaces, a total provided on Parcel B. If two additional spaces are removed due to. Comment #7, then 19 spaces must be provided on Parcel B. Case FLD2007-06020 must be revised to indicate such requirement for the units on Parcel A. Noted. Timothy S. Aebie Vice President Ground Floor Engineering Tim@groundfl,com www.groundfl.com 800-738-0525 ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 9 2007 ?LANNING DEPARTMENT 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee I FL 34761 CITY OFCLEARWATER 800-738-0525 1 407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com i CA# 26018 ?KlvlNRa PLANNING DEPARTMENT GROUND CRY OF CLEARWATER ENGINEERING MARBELLA LUXURY CONDOMINIUMS BUILDING COLOR LEGEND COLOR DURON TYPE LOCATION MILLENIUM COLORS COLORS P-1 WALLS 8334 M. TAUPE ROSE 8334M Taupe Rose P-2 WALLS 8332 W. SPICE BEIGE 8332W Spice Beicle CSI P-3 WALLS 8281 W. PINK MOCHA 8281vv Pink M,,,-'- P-4 WALLS 8250 W. IVORY SAMPLER 82 OW vory Sampler P-5 COLUMNS WHITE BANDS P-6 TRELLIS WHITE P-7 ROOF 7856 A. TOMAHAWK 7856A Tomahawk cci P-8 GRILLS/ 8856 N. RAILING BERNARD BROWN 10125 W. Colonial Drive. Suite 212 1 Ocoee I FL 34761 800-738-0525 1 407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 2:26 PM To: 'Tim' Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Garage DRC Application Comments Tim - The City has just completed roadway improvements to Coronado Drive as part of the Beach Walk project, which included new sidewalks with specialty street lights and trees in tree grates. Based on the plans submitted, the only way to roll the trash dumpsters from the northern and center trash rooms to the trash staging area is via the public sidewalk within the Coronado Drive right-of-way. After discussing your question with the Engineering Department, it is unacceptable from a safety and sanitary aspect to use the public sidewalk to transport the dumpsters to the southerly trash staging area. Alternative methods or locations of dumpster transportation, as discussed below, need to be employed. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Tim [mailto:tim@groundfl.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 12:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Garage DRC Application Comments Wayne, Per your comment below, is it not acceptable to roll the trash form the remote trash areas to the staging areas along the exterior of the building? 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A1.01 - The response indicates the center and northern trash rooms are only for the storage of trash. However, based on the floor plans starting. with A2.04, there are trash chutes from the upper floors allowing residents to drop their trash into the chute that lands in the trash room on the ground floor. My guess is there will be a dumpster in these ground floor trash rooms that will be relocated when full to place an empty dumpster under the chute, and that the trash will not just land on the floor of the trash rooms. It is further my assumption that these full dumpsters will be rolled to a trash staging area to be picked up by the trash truck. It is still a question as to how, if the only trash staging area is on the south side of the property, the dumpsters from the northern and center trash rooms will get to this designated trash staging area. Alternately, the parking spaces adjacent to and parallel with Stair Core F and C should be removed and the exterior doors to these trash rooms should be removed and relocated to the inside of the building so that the dumpsters can be rolled internally to the southern trash room to exit the building to the trash staging area. This would remove two parking spaces from Parcel A, requiring two additional spaces on Parcel B for the residential project. 4/19/07 - WW Thanks Timothy S. Aebie 8/8/2007 Page 2 of 2 Vice President Ground Floor Engineering Tim@groundfl.com www.groundfl.com 800-738-0525 DISCLAIMER: No expressed or implied warranty is made by Ground Floor Engineering, Inc. regarding the accuracy or reliability of electronically stored data. We reserve the right to modify, update, and develop electronically stored information without notice and assume no liability for any errors resulting from use of same. User agrees to corroborate the data to determine its accuracy for the planned use. Although we strive to make certain the data is virus free, we assume no responsibility for any damage caused by installation. Use of this data indicates that User accepts the above conditions. This e-mail contains proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately alert Tim Aebie by reply e- mail and then delete this message and its attachments. 8/8/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 8:39 AM To: Joe Burdette (E-mail) Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: FLD2005-02021 - Marbella Minor Revision Joe - Attached are the revised comments on the review of the resubmitted plans for a Minor Revision to the Marbella project, approved under FLD2005-02021. Time is of the essence here, as the plans need to be revised quickly and one copy of the revised plans submitted to me. I will check the revised plans against the revised comments that have been generated in the attachment. Assuming all revisions would be acceptable, we would then generate a Minor Revision Development Order. Once the revised plans are accepted and a Minor Revision Development Order is issued, I will then need 15 copies of the plans for the CDB. I don't want to understate the necessity for turning the revisions around quickly. I would not like to see the inability to have this Minor Revision hold up the parking garage request. Wayne E2J Marbella Minor Revisions - Cha... • • FLD2005-02021 - MARBELLA - MINOR REVISIONS NECESSARY July 16, 2007 1. Nothing in this review and pending approval includes any review by the Building and Fire Departments. All revisions must comply with Building and Fire Codes. 2. 7/13/07 - WW Indicate on Sheet A1.01 the VE flood zone. 4/19/07 - WW First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - None of the original civil or architectural plans or the survey indicate the affected FEMA flood zones on the property. Based on a review with Doug King in our Engineering Department, the site (Parcel A) is located within various Velocity Flood Zones. Based on FEMA requirements, only storage may occur below BFE. Need to show on the plans the FEMA flood zone lines. 3. Condition of Approval of the Minor Revision: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the survey and civil site plans shall show the FEMA flood zones. 4. Condition of Approval of the Minor Revision: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil site and landscape plans shall be revised to reflect the modifications approved under this Minor Revision. 5. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A1.01 - Indicate ALL proposed setbacks to ALL property lines. Only the setback to the northeast corner has been indicated. 4/19/07 - WW First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Show proposed setbacks to property lines. Cannot encroach any more than what the CDB approved plan indicated. To this end, it is noted that on the north side, north of Stair Core G, the storage areas and balconies extend westward farther west of the Stair Core G than indicated on the approved CDB plans (see column at R7/8). Based on the civil plans and Sheets A1.01 and A2.01 of the original plans approved by the CDB showing the slight angle of the property in relation to the proposed building, it appears this new building extension will encroach greater than the 15 feet shown on the plans approved by the CDB. 6. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A1.01 - Show the following revisions: a. On the north side on the Coronado Drive side, show a north/south sidewalk connector to the stairs to the fire command room. The sidewalk from Stair Core G does not need to go straight out to Coronado Drive, but can turn and go south to the sidewalk from the adjacent lobby, removing excess sidewalk and creating additional landscape area; b. In the center on the Coronado Drive side, the sidewalk from Stair Core B does not need to go straight out to Coronado Drive, but can turn and go north to the sidewalk from the adjacent lobby, removing excess sidewalk and creating additional landscape area; Page 1 of 6 c. On the south side on the Coronado Drive side, show a north/south sidewalk connector from the trash room to the trash staging area; d. On the south side on the Coronado Drive side, show a sidewalk connector from Stair Core A out and turning the building corner to link up with the trash staging area; e. On the west side of the building north of the ramp to the second level, revise the lobby and exit corridor from Stair Core E to match that shown on Sheet A2.01, with a sidewalk connector outside the building under the portico to the main sidewalk to South Gulfview Blvd.; and f. On the west side of the building south of the ramp to the second level, revise the lobby and exit corridor from Stair Core D to match that shown on Sheet A2.01, also revising to show the storage room adjacent to the west side of the building with no exterior door. 4/19/07 - WW First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Show all sidewalks from the building egress points (lobbies, stairs and trash rooms) to the sidewalk within the adjacent rights-of-way. 7. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A1.01 - The response indicates the center and northern trash rooms are only for the storage of trash. However, based on the floor plans starting with A2.04, there are trash chutes from the upper floors allowing residents to drop their trash into the chute that lands in the trash room on the ground floor. My guess is there will be a dumpster in these ground floor trash rooms that will be relocated when full to place an empty dumpster under the chute, and that the trash will not just land on the floor of the trash rooms. It is further my assumption that these full dumpsters will be rolled to a trash staging area to be picked up by the trash truck. It is still a question as to how, if the only trash staging area is on the south side of the property, the dumpsters from the northern and center trash rooms will get to this designated trash staging area. Alternately, the parking spaces adjacent to and parallel with Stair Core F and C should be removed and the exterior doors to these trash rooms should be removed and relocated to the inside of the building so that the dumpsters can be rolled internally to the southern trash room to exit the building to the trash staging area. This would remove two parking spaces from Parcel A, requiring two additional spaces on Parcel B for the residential project. 4/19/07 - WW First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - There are three trash rooms indicated fronting Coronado Drive. For intent clarification, is the southern trash staging area, as shown on the approved CDB plan, the only pickup point for dumpsters? If so, why then do the middle and northern trash rooms have doors facing Coronado Drive? How will the dumpsters get to the southern trash staging area? Or, is it the intent to have three trash staging areas? 8. Sheet A2.01 - Dimension the width of the handicap walk aisle for Space 136. 9. Sheet A2.01 - Two problems exist with the handicap parking. A door opens into the accessible aisle for parking space 135 and a wall partially obstructs the exit from the accessible aisle from parking space 136. Suggestions to improve these situations include 1) relocating the aisle for parking space 136 to the east side of that space and extending it to intersect with the aisle for space 138 and 2) Page 2 of 6 II 0 0 relocating parking space 135 to the location currently occupied by space 122 and marking an accessible aisle for this space that would extend across the drive aisle and connect with space 136. 10. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.01 - Installation of safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly are still needed for parking spaces numbered: 105, 112, 138, 139, 142 and 143. Signs to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces must still be installed for parking spaces 101, 103, 105, 112, 142, 143, 159 and 161. 4/19/07 - WW Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 112, 141, 142, 145, 146, 164, 165, 166 and 167. In addition to mirrors to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces, signs must be installed stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" for these parking spaces. 11. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.01 - Revise the number of parking spaces in the Legend from 55 to 56 and the number handicap spaces from 5 to 4. 4/19/07 - WW Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Amend the parking number counts in the Legend. 12. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.01 - The response indicates openings have been added to the drawing. I don't see any material change in the drawing from the previously submitted drawing. Solid walls are the same designation as walls with openings. If there are to be openings in the wall with a grating in the arched area, some of the columns indicated on Sheet A2.01 interfere with the arches. 4/19/07 - WW Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revise. 13. Sheet A2.02 - For the handicap space to the left of the ramp, properly dimension the width of the handicap space and the walk aisle. For the handicap space to the right of the ramp, dimension the width of the handicap walk aisle. 14. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.02 - Installation of safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly are still needed for parking spaces numbered: 201, 209, 235 and 236. Signs to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces must still be installed for parking spaces 201 and 209. Staff did not request signs or mirrors for or adjacent to parking spaces numbered: 256, 257, 258, 259 or 260 (remove signs and/or mirrors). 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A2.02 - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 201, 209, 235 (if wall is installed as part of ramp), 238 (if wall is installed as part of ramp), 258 and 266. In addition to mirrors to aid motorists Page 3 of 6 • • backing out of parking spaces, signs must be installed stating "Use column- mounted mirrors when backing" for these parking spaces. 15. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.02 - These trash rooms should rather be designated as storage, since the trash chute goes to the first floor, not into this room. 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A2.02 - The trash rooms in front of Spaces 258 and 266 are inaccessible due to the location of the doorway and the abutting parking spaces. Revise. 16. Sheet A2.02 - While the response indicates openings have been added to the drawing, I don't see any material change in the drawing except at the open portico area. This comment should be broadened to the first, second and third floors where there are arched openings in the walls with a grating in the arched areas. The elevations show such openings, but there are columns at appear to interfere with these openings as drawn, making the accuracy of the elevations questionable. This is applicable to all elevations where such openings are shown. 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A2.02 - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall above the portico (windows/doors) and for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revise. 17. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.03 - Installation of safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly are still needed for parking spaces numbered: 301 and 309. Signs to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces must still be installed for parking spaces 301 and 309. Staff did not request signs or mirrors for or adjacent to parking spaces numbered: 357, 358,. 359, 361 or 362 (remove signs and/or mirrors). 4/19/07 - WW First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 301, 309, 358 and 366. In addition to mirrors to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces, signs must be installed stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" for these parking spaces. 18. Sheet A2.03 - The trash room and lobby in front of Spaces 332, 341 and 342 are inaccessible due to the location of the doorways and the abutting parking spaces. Revise similar to that shown on Sheet A2.02. 19. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A2.03 - See comment #16 above. 4/19/07 - WW First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall above the portico (windows?) and for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revise. 20. 7/16/07 - WW Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - While a legend has been added and the color numbers added to the elevations, it is not extremely understandable. Provide color samples/chips for the proposed exterior color scheme. Unless you desire at this time to provide a color rendering for both the Page 4 of 6 • 0 east and west elevations that will illustrate visually the proposed color scheme, such will be a condition of approval of this Minor Revision to be provided prior to the issuance of the building permit. 4/19/07 - WW Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - Indicate the exterior materials and colors on the plans. Provide color samples/chips for the proposed exterior color scheme. 21. 7/16/07 - WW Sheets A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 - Your response states you have reduced the proposed height shown at 150 feet to the CDB approved height of 148 feet. However, reviewing the dimensions on the side of the elevations, Levels 1, 2 and 4 - 16 remain the same. Only Level 3 has changed from a floor-to-floor height of 10'-6" to 9'-0", which according to my math is 1'-6" of difference, not the two- foot difference necessary. Revise. 4/19/07 - WW Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - Building height approved by CDB is 148 feet. Proposed height is now 150 feet. Section 4-406.A.8 does not allow an increase to the height of the building as a Minor Revision. Either reduce to 148 feet to remain under the consideration as a Minor Revision or need to file a new FLD application to increase the building height for potential approval by the CDB. 22. Sheets A2.04, A2.05, A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 - Revisions have been made on Levels 1 - 3 between Station Points Q - R and 9.2 - 5.8 due to potential issues with setbacks that have also apparently forced changes to Levels 4 - 13 for Unit H by removing a balcony off the casual dining and master bedroom. I am not trying to design for you, but it would seem that some type of cantilevered balcony, maybe not extending as far from the main wall as previously, would be a selling point for Unit H (whereas Unit B still has a nice terrace). 23. Sheet A3.01 - The balcony and pergolas shown for the units on Level 13 on the north and south sides are really for the units on Level 14. Revise Levels 13 and 14. 24. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A3.02 now shows non-usable windows for the spa area on this sheet, but such non-usable windows are not reflected on Sheet A2.04. Revise Sheet A2.04. 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A3.02 - On Level 4, the elevation for the spa area is not drawn correctly. Windows and railings for balconies are shown where there are none. However, as a blank wall, why can't there be some windows (could be non-usable). 25. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A3.02 - On Level 14, the floor plan indicates a roof. This roof may appear to be a flat roof with slope lines for drainage to roof drains. If this is true and there are parapets for these flat roof areas, then the elevations should show a line/band at the parapet height from the terrace over to the windows for Units C and G. 4/19/07 - WW Page 5 of 6 9 0 Sheet A3.02 - On Level 14, the floor plan for this floor indicates a roof on either side of the "courtyard", yet the elevation shows a blank wall. Revise. 26. 7/16/07 - WW See comment #22 above. 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A3.04 - There appears to be a column on the balcony of Unit H for Levels 4 -13 not shown (see Sheets A2.04 and A2.05). 27. 7/16/07 - WW Sheet A3.04 - Pergola should be shown on Level 14 (same as shown on Sheet A3.03). 4/19/07 - WW Sheet A3.04 - There should be pergolas shown on the right side of Level 14 and in the middle for Level 15. 28. 7/16/07 - WW Response is insufficient. Provide the calculations for the north, south, east and west elevations. 4/19/07 - WW Provide documentation that at least 60 percent of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. 29. Based on 102 units in this building on Parcel A, a parking requirement of two spaces per unit and the parking counts on Sheets A2.01, A2.02 and A2.03, there are 187 parking spaces being provided on Parcel A. As the requirement for the 102 units is 204 total parking spaces, a total of 17 spaces must be provided on Parcel B. If two additional spaces are removed due to Comment #7, then 19 spaces must be provided on Parcel B. Case FLD2007-06020 must be revised to indicate such requirement for the units on Parcel A. S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationsIGulfview S 0325 Lucca Development (T) 2005 - ApprovedlMarbella Minor Revisions - Changes Necessary #2 7.1607.doc Page 6 of 6 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: hunraf@aol.com Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 12:24 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Minor Amendments - Marbella Wayne Will have the minor amendments for Marbella to you today as promised. Do you need more than 1 set? I have two sets, but if you don't need it I will keep the second one. Joe AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 6/26/200'7 Wayne • Here is the Marbella minor amendment request. Parking is 192 on Parcel A. We have addressed each comment separately. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Thanks JUN 25 2007 Joe PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 I VID GR®UNDFLOOR •eNGINeCRING FLD2005-02021- MARBELLA - MINOR REVISIONS NECESSARY Responses June 22, 2007 Wayne Wells, AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 (727) 562-4504 Mr. Wells, ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 25 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Please find responses below to the Minor Revision comments from your office dated April, 19, 2007- Please find revised drawings under cover as well. Don't hesitate to contact Ground Floor should you require anthing further thanks. 1. itlod"ig in this review and p,..eid1Zlg a.f"iErrvveu includes any li.`viE.w 11- ul?. Building- and 1 11..E ss?.?sulalllw.?li:a. All revisions must comply with Building and Fire Codes. Ok I Cover »ee€ - Revise °t.oronaue i=sivn." to --Coronado Drive". Revised 3. First Sheet A2.01- This is actually the site plan and the Sheet number needs to changed as there cannot 1, t...,._ C•t s h i 01 IA-JA k Q'i-f A 1 n 1 a1,? ? 7-: 1: rha ?;, _ ? ?e? 1 ,,,> VV LYYV I.JP1e?sS ?]1.e.Vi I JLLV 43.111 V.r.?.Ji19.V4111.V 1 or lertile ?Llti 11A.Alk v1iLLt, Y?ILLV&A 1-3 LliL 1 LIOL i i j%ji v1411J. First Sheet has been renumbered as: A1.01 SITE PLAN 4. Starting with the First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan), in the bottom right corner is an sheet indicator that the JL1eeL 1J j Vl I 11 110 1114 1 Vl 1111. lilV[dilALlg Vl t111J !1111 i1i41V1, ?Lilsb 612ere 4111 151010 4lillii e7Ri 1'A.21 011VW4J ill lllli] set of plans. Either revise to indicate something that makes sense or remove it. Removed from sheet set 5. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Provide a north arrow, bar scale and indicate the abutting street names. Added north arrow, bar scale and street names 10125 W. Colonial Drive; Suite 212 ; Ocoee 1 FL 34761 800-738-0525 i 40-7-517-4140 Fax 19rU.n(J.1-Lcvrn I CA# 26018 • . n with 0 - 6. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - If the floor plapsstarti a tk Second Sheet A2.0I (First Floor), are at a scale of 3/32" = 1'-0", the same 3/32" = I'-0" scale is indicated for this sheet, which cannot be correct, Revise the drawing scale for this sheet. Drawing scale indication for site plan has been revised. Site plan is at 1/20" = 1'-0" and Floor plan is at 3/32" = 1'-0" 7. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - On the north side the building is encroaching into the retention pond. Revise. Floor plan has been revised, leaving more open space on north side near the retention pond. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - None of the original civil or architectural plans or the survey indicate the affected FEMA flood zones on the property. Based on a review with Doug King in our Engineering Department, the site (Parcel A) is located within various Velocity Flood Zones. Based on FEMA requirements, only storage may occur below BFE. Need to show on the plans the FEI?!i?A flood zone lines. Whole site is in "VE" flood zone per FEMA y. Condition of Approval of the Minor Revision: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the survey and civil site plans shall show the FEMA flood zones. Whole site is in "VE" flood zone per FEMA 10. Condition of Approval of the Minor Revision: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil site and landscape plans shall be revised to reflect the modifications approved under this Minor Revision. Architectural plans has been revised according to minor revisions, Civil and Landscape will also be revised prior to issuance of any permits. 11. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Remove landscaping from this sheet, as it is confusing with other information being depicted. Landscaping has been removed from Site plan 12. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Show proposed setbacks to property lines. Cannot encroach any more than what the CDB approved plan indicated. To this end, it is noted that on the north side, north of Stair Core G, the storage areas and balconies extend westward farther west of the Stair Core G than indicated on the approved CDR plans (see column at R-7/8). Based on the ci .riL mL>MI of the original plans approved by the CDR showing the slight anngl;... i,. E q , t- proposed building, it appears this new building extension will encroach greater dm, ud l eet jv , Floor plan has been revised as per CDB plan All sidewalks from the building Egress points has been showed ;Iic il-p -I-JOS11L 10S 1LlSS.1. ,)J4r,.J.J: 11 7V.. ,illy ISSGil "kI U11-v 111M AIK; [lull! 1BJIUIK;SSS UOJSi IQVilla lice V%, tiiJ V=,? ?---ni;; have i'asSS Jtagp i eaeaj. Yes, the southern trash staging area is the only pickup point for dumpsters, the others are for daily storage of trash. 140.1250 `i-Y. C-0Io iai Drivei uile 2-12 j Lice c i [-t?3'rq7bI U /_Q 1u0 - 1 gro,:nori.co - i CAy 2601V • • 15. Floor plan sheets, starting with Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor), are indicated to be drawn at a scale of 3/32" =1'-0". However, placing a scale to the plans, the dimensions indicated don't measure up, as they are slightly off (less than what the dimensions indicate). Clarify the scale of the floor plan sheets. All Floor plan sheets has been fixed as per 3/32" = 1'-0" scale 16. Please confirm the handicap accessible route from parking and units to a sidewalk within the abutting rights-of-way is from units on or above the 4`h floor to Elevator 3 out to South Gulfview Boulevard (for those handicap spaces on the north side of the ramp the handicap individuals woulci need to go up Elevator 4 to the 0 Floor, going over to Elevator 3, going down Elevator 3 to the ground floor le, the same exit point). This is the correct assumption. i i . V or lilt thwellhlg %where t c vAl3si ilk r%GuirtJt cn is twv parking spaces pcr unit ivr a total of 2U4 parking spaces, a total of seven handicap parking spaces area required, in accordance with Section 3- 1409.A (only five shown on Sheet A2.01). Two handicap (HC) parking spaces have been added at second floor level. Now we have 5 HC parking spaces at first floor level and 2 HC parking spaces at Second floor level. _i..,. 311eU AJ:.'..U ,-I i'3a1a,1 a11'?. ea:?.ii? :?n1-*i?.1.7i 1'115i I'?4.3?3=r3 - ? v'?`s3 l???i€??? -? e- 1-U v KIN the not tht aJt comer of the blind 1116 168 and 169). which do not function internally with adequate/required backup areas/drive aisles, are shown as if these are private garage where the vehicles vaa.n into tuV >_.vrsruatlur Dalvt: ilgllt-of-vvay Ivrluafll is not permitted by Code), and arc not shown with any driveways. No such similar parking spaces were shown on the approved CDR plans. Remove these two parking spaces. Both parking spaces from First floor level has been removed A r.':«.,{ CIL _-,# A M /C+:a Plan, 1 _ : t a L:l:a ? . +'_ F. 41 i a z s3 ., it 1'11Jt L)ll*_%IL tiL,.V1 told. tcmovc the Jlglit Y1JLU111tV ti1Qi1?114s i1 Vln both JWes Col tic Jilttlilcrn "driveway", as this is not a vehicular driveway but a trash staging area. Sight visibility triangles from the southern Driveway (trash staging area) has been removed tea). Second Si '.l)i aia"c=rsl all i; 1 [ t:i'ii '.; _a _?i'or :5 3_eet r3L._?.m 1 ?eCOIVIQ .i J00rfI & 'I S-011-M-110-1 e) °3?.sae?i' I_ ?.p„1 1i '-1 e g ?. t1 ` l? hall into paarking spaces or drive aisles, each parking suaCG Vvlttrl.lnJ -hat are at all aliglt, Shah ilVt encroach int shall measure 9-feet wide by 18-feet long and each bi-directional drive aisle shall be 24-feet wide without encroaf n. met. t 5tny objectstStructures. See columns at G-5, H-5, H- , j-5, M-5, N-5, N-7 and P-5. These columns was not supposed to appear at this floor level, Column has been removed (Frozen in CAD) 21. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Handicap aisle for parking space #139 will require a 44-inch clear width between the corner of the wall and the edge of handicap aisle. 44" clear width between the corner of the wall and the edge of handicap aisle has been provided and marked cL'nY?... >°; 11e ? IN-Z.1,11 1`t-11 ?? d 3L 01 i - 1iiSt Mi ..., r i)S,°.,3-an-3 1P'J a.??.?. x;'.3.3..' YY .???.,? BLS L3? ?le l movements at ihe -vVay access ir1`tcr eCtio . in Viliei words k2cp 1112 dilvc'v` ay and ramp mv'virlg - le the other two legs of the intersection stops. Ok 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee I FL 34761 800-738-0525 1407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com CA# 26018 23. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 101,102, 103, 104,105,112,141, 142, 145, 146, 164, 165, 166 and 167. In addition to minors to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces, signs must be installed stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" for these parking spaces. Column Mounted mirrors and signage stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" has been provide at adequate places. 24. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - There appears to be a column indicated within the drive aisle north of Spaces 107 and 121. Clarify/modify. Columns is not supposed to appear at this floor level, Column has been removed (Frozen in CAD) 25. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Spaces 132, 134, 150 and 151 do not meet the requirements of the Code for a 24-foot drive aisle behind these spaces and cannot be counted as required parking (Code does not permit "stacked" parking). You may leave these as parking spaces, which would be assumed that both "stacked" spaces would be for the same dwelling unit owner, but they canricet uo vv -?dl meeting the Code parking requirements of two parking, spaces new d w cll.; . S ii lie ) V . ?, numbering from these spaces. Parking spaces 132,134,150 and 151 has been added in to lobby. All parking spaces has been renumbered accordingly 26. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Since this site is within a velocii nr::d zo e, flip 1-1 Fire command room has been relocated on second floor at the northern side near to Stair core G '1'7 C .7 L a A '? A t /r < d rt. .?1 A 3 occollu 1,7 iitl.i. I VI `i'ii JL 1 IVV1) -!'"111 t\.11?,.! Lin, FIRSiR13i Parking number counts in legend has been amended 28. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revise. Opening has been added 29. Sheet A2.02 - Remove Spaces 236 and 237 to allow the ramp between levels 2 and 3 to function. Parking spaces 236 and 237 has been deleted from their previous position and all parking spaces has been renumbered accordingly 30. Sheet A2.02 - Amend the parking number counts in the Legend. Also, I find no van accessible spaces on this floor. Remove from Legend. Parking number counts in legend has been amended 31. Sheet A2.02 - Unclear why the room next to Space 201 is indicated as "pool equipment", since this is also shown on Sheet A3.03 (should be Sheet A2.03 - Third Floor). Room next to parking space 201 on second floor has been renamed as "STORAGE" instead of "Pool Equipment" 32. Sheet A2.02 and (should be) A2.03 - For parking levels 2 and 3, consider creating a one-way clockwise flow for better circulation and to minimize conflict points for motorists. One way clockwise direction flow has been implemented on parking levels 2 and 3 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee I FL 34761 800-738-0525 (407-517-4140 Fax groundfl.com I CA# 26018 33. Sheet A2.02 - Redesign or Hist01 0 all safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 201, 209, 235 (if wall is installed as part of ramp), 238 (if wall is installed as part of ramp), 258 and 266. In addition to mirrors to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces, signs must be installed stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" for these parking spaces. Column Mounted mirrors and signage stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" has been provide at adequate places. 34. Sheet A2.02 - There appears to be a column indicated within the drive aisle north of Spaces 203 and 218. Clarify/modify. Columns is not supposed to appear at this floor level, Column has been removed (Frozen in CAD) 35. Sheet A2.02 - The trash rooms in front of Spaces 258 and 266 are inaccessible due to the location of the doorway and the abutting parking spaces. Revise. Access to both the trash rooms has been revised and provided from lobby area 36. Sheet A2.02 - The trash room and lobby in front of Spaces 242 and 243 are inaccessible due to the location of the doorways and the abutting parking spaces. Revise. Access to both trash room and lobby has been revised 37. Sheet A2.02 - The lobby adjacent to Space 232 is inaccessible due to the location of the doorway and the abutting parking space. Revise. Access to lobby adjacent to space 232 has been revised 38. Sheet A2.02 - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall above the portico (windows/doors) and for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revise. Opening has been added at second floor level 39. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Revise to be Sheet A2.03. Third floor sheet number revised to A2.03 40. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - The scale of this sheet is indicated as 3/33" = 1'-0", which is incorrect (see also comment #15 above). All Floor plan sheets has been fixed as per 3/32" = 1'-0" scale 41. First Sheet A3,03 (Third Floor) - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) wherc motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 301, 309, 358 and 366. In addition to mirrors to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces, signs must be installed ..1rtiPi t ? d ` EE t ?.. tct:ing v c €-o ?- €?€m€iEe?::?s:?rors w-hen I €wa-c- for these, p spaces. Column Mounted mirrors and signage stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" has been provide at adequate places. 42. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - There appears to be a coluE;E;E i;d'acatcd withiik ti :C driv;, u;slc i.Jrt of 0 paces 30 .i and 31 18. C lariiyimd3iiity. Columns is not supposed to appear at this floor level, Column has been removed (Frozen in CAD) 43. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Amend the parking number counts in the Legend. Also, 1 find no van accessible spaces on this floor. Remove from Legend. Parking number counts in legend has been amended 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 { Ocoee FL 34761 800-738-0525 1407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com I CA# 26018 44. First Sheet A3.03 Third Floor - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, revise the verbiage on the west side to read "Open Arcade Portico Below". Removed open arcade portico from third floor plan 45. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall above the portico (windows?) and for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revise. Opening has been added at third floor level as per West elevation 46. Please confirm the handicap accessible route from parking and units to the pool (common element) is from Elevators 2, 3, 4 and 5 to the courtyard on the 4th Floor and going through the spa (or the fitness center), and that the restrooms in the spa are accessible for the pool. Yes, route above is correct, restrooms in spa have been designed for the pool size. 47. Sheet A2.04 - is it the intent to have the terrace on the southwest side as a common element accessible to all v;,hind the abutting dwellings (since it is accessible from the pool area) or to divide that portion of this terrace west of the fitness center up as larger private terraces for the two abutting dwelling units? The is a common terrace shown, but there is also two private terraces for units "C" and "D" 48. Sheet A2.04 - Different than the question above, is it the intent to have the terrace on the northyaest side as a coon d•Lcm-al:-Ei a i'4__i JLL to SIrdy the, i-LSVV aL'LL•.rrg i_ar Vi?13.3.gi ?iltd.illC 17L IS 1dSJL U\/VVilill.lllV 216/Lit LLS1Jr common areas) or to divide -.this terrace up as larger private terraces for the three abutting dwelling units? Likewise there is a common terrace for 4 units as well as private terraces for units "H", "G" and "F" . 4. Sheet A2.04 -There are planters shown extending from the west side of the pool deck area and terraces ?hc: south --dh of %di=tance €h faS_ Pls?r3LV #nrs n ut an-d! ?=+? ? S_•iS ?? um.-Its. ?_S. Dimension the _e E•?C`.nd frc`ii the, e? .? (appears to be approx? nately 4 - 5 et). Note: These were not shown on the plans approved by the CDB. Planters shown on west side of the pool deck area and terraces on the south and north sides of units has been deleted from forth floor plan 50. First Sheet A2.06 (14th Floor) - Unit B on the north side, shouldn't it be Unit H, in keeping with that indicated on Sheets A2.04 and A2:05? Yes, Unit B indicated on North side of 14th floor plan is actually Unit H. Naming and area has been revised accordingly 51. Second Sheet A2.06 (15th Floor) - Renumber this sheet to be Sheet A2.07. 15th floor sheet number revised to A2.07 52. Second Sheet A2.06 (15th Floor) - Unit G on the south side should be renumbered as Unit C. Also, all written verbiage for this unit is backwards and can't be read without a mirror. Reverse the verbiage. Unit G indicated on south side of 15th floor is actually Unit H. Naming and area has been revised accordingly. Also all verbiage has been revised 53. Sheet A2.07 (16th Floor) - Renumber this sheet to be Sheet A2.08. 16th floor sheet number revised to A2.08 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee FL 34761 800-738-0525 1407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com I CA# 26018 ? • 54. Sheet A2.07 (16th Floor) - Provide unit numbering and the square footages for these two units (similar to other floors). Unit numbering and footages has been added to both Units on 16th floor level 55. Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - Indicate the exterior materials and colors on the plans. Provide color samples/chips for the proposed exterior color scheme. Proposed exterior color scheme has been added to all four exterior elevations 56. Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - Building height approved by CDB is 148 feet. Proposed height is now 150 feet. Section 4-406.A.8 does not allow an increase to the height of the building as a Minor Revision. Either reduce to 148 feet to remain under the consideration as a Minor Revision or need to file a new FLD application to increase the building height for potential approval by the CDB. Total building height has been reduced to 148' as approved by CDB. 57. Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - The proposed elevation for Levels 5 and above is much plainer and blander than that approved by the CDB. The plans approved by the CDB included stepbacks at the 11th, 14th and 15th Levels. The proposed plans, including the incorporation of the ten dwelling units previously on Parcel B, does not provide any similar significant stepbacK s except ?t Level 15, which also plays into this more plainer and blander appearance. Looking for additional architectural detailing to assist with the appearance, such as, but not limited to, mansard roof structures, cornices, ? ?- __ f°[f1unills a ins pilasters fa,_1se balconies en _ Inc_lear :illy metni rn3_9;'cgs 13 introduced toward tbae cernter of the building on Levels 8, 9 and 11. Also € f ar N-aliy the pergolas on Level 16 lack any detail and appear as a flat roof with balcony. Note: This ?:I -- c_si: -et.iil Sidilt k<••s[v?.? L7:.? [iiJV k,e?, lli?ekkt+. E. ?.,l! YYikii lYti4i!ct4i 1??: i! ..?IC :{F F ,? st.. F.F See revised elevations, we have added some horizontal banding and added windows where there were previously blank walls, and have modified the mansard and flat roofs to increase the aesthetics. 58. Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - It would be extremely helpful to have the A - R or 1-11 station point referencing shown on the appropriate elevation drawings. Grids has been added to all exterior elevations 59. Sheet A3.01- On the left hand side on Level 4 there should be a balcony shown for Unit H. Balcony has been deleted from all floor plans 60. Sheet A3.01 - There should be a door to the lobby shown on the one-story stair/elevator tower on the right hand side next to the pool, as well as two pergolas at the pool area (similar to Sheet A3.02). Door and pergola added on one story stair/elevator tower on the right hand side next to pool 61. Sheet A3.01- There should be pergolas shown on the right and left sides for Levels 14 and 15 Pergolas added on the right and left sides for level 14 and 15 62. Sheet A3.02 - Garage door opening must provide a minimum opening height of 8'-2" to meet ADA requirements. Dimension door opening. Dimension added to garage door opening which is equal to 8'-2" as per ADA requirements 63. Sheet A3.02 - On Level 4 there should be a railing shown to the left and right of the center railing for the courtyard. Railing shown on left and right side of the centre railing of the courtyard 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee i FL 34761 800-738-0525 1407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com i CA# 26018 0 0 64. Sheet A3.02 - On Level 4, the elevation for the spa area is not drawn correctly. Windows and railings for balconies are shown where there are none. However, as a blank wall, why can't there be some windows (could be non-usable). Non-usable windows has been added at level 4 for the SPA area 65. Sheet A3.02 - At the base of Level 4, shouldn't there be some banding shown, similar to that shown on Sheet A3.01, Second Sheet A3.03 and Sheet A3.04? Yes, band added at the base of level 4 similar to that shown on other elevations 66. Sheet A3.02 - On Level 14, the floor plan for this floor indicates a roof on either side of the "courtyard", yet the elevation shows a blank wall. Revise. Roof added as per floor plan 67. Sheet A3.02 - On Level 15, there are some hip roofs that should be detailed with barrel tiles similar to the very top roof structure. Barrel tiles added to hip roof at level 15 68. Second Sheet A3.03 - On the left hand side, the portico on Level 1 should be open, not closed (per Sheet A2.01). Portico on level 1 revised as open 69. Second Sheet A3.03 - On the right hand side, Levels 4 -14 are not cantilevered from the face of Levels 1- 3 out as shown, but rather the building on Levels 1- 3 extend to the same outside face of the wall as Levels 4 -14 (see floor plan sheets). Yes, elevation revised according to floor plans 70. Second Sheet A3.03 - There appears to be a column on the balcony of Unit B for Levels 5 - 13 not shown (see Sheet A2.05). Column shown on the balcony of Unit B for levels 5 -13 71. Second Sheet A3.03 - On Level 14, the floor plan for this floor indicates a roof on either side of the "courtyard", yet the elevation shows a blank wall. Revise. Roof has been added next to courtyard on level 14 72. Second Sheet A3.03 - There should be pergolas shown on the right side of Level 14 and in the middle for Level 15. Pergola added as per floor plan 73. Second Sheet A3.03 - On Level 15, there are some hip roofs that should be detailed with barrel tiles similar to the very top roof structure. Barrel tiles added to hip roof at level 15 74. Sheet A3.04 - On the right hand side, the portico on Level 1 should be open, not closed (per Sheet A2.01). Portico on level 1 revised as open 75. Sheet A3.04 - On the left hand side, Levels 4 -14 are not cantilevered from the face of Levels 1 - 3 out as shown, but rather the building on Levels 1 - 3 extend to the same outside face of the wall as Levels 4 -14 (see floor plan sheets). 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 E Ocoee I FL 34761 800-738-0525 1407-517-4140 Fax f groundfl.com E CA# 26018 'Yes, elevation revised accorling to floor plans 76. Sheet A3.04 - There appears to be a column on the balcony of Unit H for Levels 4 -13 not shown (see Sheets A2.04 and A2.05). Balcony has been deleted from Unit H next to Master suite 77. Sheet A3.04 - On Level 14, the floor plan for this floor -indicates a roof on either side of the "courtyard", yet the elevation shows a blank wall. Revise. Roof has been added next to courtyard on level 14 78. Sheet A3.04 - There should be pergolas shown on the right side of Level 14 and in the middle for Level 15. Pergola added as per floor plan 79. Sheet A3.04 - On Level 15, there are some hip roofs that should be detailed with barrel tiles similar to the very top roof structure. Barrel tiles added to hip roof at level 15 80. Provide documentation that at least 60 percent of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. We have calculated each fagade and we are in excess of 60% decorative features on the elevations as it relates to the overall building elevation as a whole. 81. It is noted that the Minor Revisions submitted include the intent of relocating the 10 dwelling units approved by the CDB on top of a parking garage on Parcel B (accessory to the dwelling units) to Parcel A and that no revisions were submitted for Parcel B. Based on the comments above, Parcel A does not appear capable of providing all the required parking for the 102 dwelling units on Parcel A (at the minimum of two parking spaces per dwelling unit) and some required parking for the dwelling units on Parcel A will be required to be placed on. Parcel B. It is further noted that the developer is working with the City for the construction of a parking garage for public parking, which will require an amendment to the Marbella project to add the parking garage on Parcel B. Assuming the City agrees to enter into a "contract" for the parking garage, that structure and site plan will be reviewed later as part of that application. If this does not occur, a new submission for a Minor Revision will be necessary for the parking on Parcel B (accessory to the dwelling units on Parcel A). Narrative Response that if the city and Lucca do not reach an agreement, for the required parking to bring Marbella back up to 2 spaces per unit will be placed on Parcel B and we will file the necessary minor amendment to show the parking. If they do reach an agreement, the parking spaces required will be inside the shared garage. After making all the changes herein, recalculate your spaces so we know exactly how many are left on Parcel A. Timothy S. Aebie Vice President Ground Floor Engineering Tim@groundfl.com www.groundfl.com 800-738-0525 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 l Ocoee I FL 34761 800-738-0525 1 407-517-4140 Fax l groundfl.com l CA# 26018 . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Hunraf@aol.com Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 1:44 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: bcala@gmadesign.com; bhornjak@themurraycompany.com; galbers@themurraycompany.com; luke.luccainc@comcast.net Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Wayne The drawings addressing all your comments will be delivered to me on Monday and I will bring them to you. The parking count on Parcel A is 192 so we will need 14 from Parcel B. Joe See what's free at AOL.com. 6/24/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:09 AM To: Joe Burdette (E-mail) Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Marbella Joe - On April 19, 2007, 1 emailed the comments needing to be addressed for the Minor Revision for the Marbella project. As the parking garage has been moving along, which I understand may be submitted on or before this Friday, we have not approved the Minor Revision. At this point, Parcel B, where the parking garage is proposed, still is approved with 10 dwelling units on it with an accessory parking garage. Do you know the status of the revisions for the Minor Revision? Please note, the parking garage project will not be found sufficient to move forward to the CDB until the Minor Revision is approved. It is still unclear how many parking spaces for the Marbella attached dwellings will be necessary to be placed on this Parcel B where the parking garage is proposed. Could you please help getting this Minor Revision moving and re-submitted? Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 5:44 PM To: 'Tim' Cc: 'Jim Brown' Subject: RE: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Tim - The ball is in your court and there is no specific time frame or deadline in order to resubmit the revised plans. I assume you will make the necessary revisions in a timely fashion and resubmit the revised plans. I will try to be more timely with the re-review so that we can issue a Minor Revision Development Order and get this behind us, and so that you can move the project forward toward construction plans for a building permit. The Flexible Development application has been granted a time extension by the Planning Director to January 19, 2008, to submit for a building permit to construct the approved improvements. The applicant may request a maximum one-year time extension from the Community Development Board (CDB), but such request and decision by the CDB must be made prior to the January 19, 2008, deadline or the project approval lapses. With the proposed/potential parking garage on Parcel B, it would be nice to have wrapped up the minor Revision prior to the review of a new Flexible Development application for the addition of the parking garage. Should you have any questions, feel free to email or call me (727-562-4504). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Tim [mailto:tim@groundfl.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:18 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'Jim Brown' Subject: RE: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Wayne, I received the comments thanks, I am sure i will have several questions as we are addressing those Is there any time limit or expiration that they need to be addressed within? Or anything else that may expire while we are addressing these? thanks again for your help. Timothy S. Aebie Vice President Ground Floor Engineering Tim@groundfl.com www.groundfl.com 800-738-0525 DISCLAIMER: No expressed or implied warranty is made by Ground Floor Engineering, Inc. regarding the accuracy or reliability of electronically stored data. We reserve the right to modify, update, and develop electronically stored information without notice and assume no liability for any errors resulting from use of same. User agrees to corroborate the data to determine its accuracy for the planned use. Although we strive to make certain the data is virus free, we assume no responsibility for any damage caused by installation. Use of this data indicates that User accepts the above conditions. This e-mail contains proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are 1 not the intended recipient, • dissemination or copying of tols message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately alert Tim Aebie by reply e-mail and then delete this message and its attachments. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 2:07 PM To: tim@groundfl.com Cc: jburdette505@tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella As we are sending emails, I am continuing to work on generating a list of changes necessary to the plans. May not finish today, as I have a meeting coming up soon that will take the rest of the day. -----Original Message----- From: Tim [mailto:tim@groundfl.com] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 1:21 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'Jim Brown' Subject: RE: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Wayne, Did you by any chance get an opportunity to finish Marbella up last week? Just checking thanks... Timothy S. Aebie Vice President Ground Floor Engineering Tim@groundfl.com www.groundfl.com 800-738-0525 DISCLAIMER: No expressed or implied warranty is made by Ground Floor Engineering, Inc. regarding the accuracy or reliability of electronically stored data. We reserve the right to modify, update, and develop electronically stored information without notice and assume no liability for any errors resulting from use of same. User agrees to corroborate the data to determine its accuracy for the planned use. Although we strive to make certain the data is virus free, we assume no responsibility for any damage caused by installation. Use of this data indicates that User accepts the above conditions. This e-mail contains proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately alert Tim Aebie by reply e-mail and then delete this message and its attachments. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:32 AM To: tim@groundfl.com Subject: RE: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella See the attached email. -----Original Message----- From: Tim [mailto:tim@groundfl.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:25 AM To: Wells, Wayne 2 __: 0 • Cc: 'Jim Brown' Subject: RE: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Wayne, Good morning, I will call you a little later this morning, I am looking of see if there is any update non the minor amendment submittal and subsequent review for Marbella. At 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella thanks Timothy S. Aebie Vice President Ground Floor Engineering Tim@groundfl.com www.groundfl.com 800-738-0525 DISCLAIMER: No expressed or implied warranty is made by Ground Floor Engineering, Inc. regarding the accuracy or reliability of electronically stored data. We reserve the right to modify, update, and develop electronically stored information without notice and assume no liability for any errors resulting from use of same. User agrees to corroborate the data to determine its accuracy for the planned use. Although we strive to make certain the data is virus free, we assume no responsibility for any damage caused by installation. Use of this data indicates that User accepts the above conditions. This e-mail contains proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately alert Tim Aebie by reply e-mail and then delete this message and its attachments. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:01 PM To: tim@groundfl.com Subject: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Tim - Oops, attached is an Amended Development Order. Wayne <<Gulfview S 325 Amended Development Order 6.16.06.doc>> 3 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 5:10 PM To: Joe Burdette (E-mail) Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Marbella Minor Revision Joe - Attached are the comments on the review of the submitted plans for a Minor Revision to the Marbella project, approved under FLD2005-02021. Once the plans are revised, please submit one copy to me. I will check the revised plans against the comments that have been generated in the attachment. Assuming all revisions would be acceptable, we would then generate a Minor Revision Development Order. Wayne NUF1 ELi Marbella Minor Revisions - Cha... • • FLD2005-02021 - MARBELLA - MINOR REVISIONS NECESSARY April 19, 2007 1. Nothing in this review and pending approval includes any review by the Building and Fire Departments. All revisions must comply with Building and Fire Codes. 2. Cover Sheet - Revise "Coronado Blvd." to "Coronado Drive". 3. First Sheet A2.01 - This is actually the site plan and the Sheet number needs to changed as there cannot be two Sheet A2.01 (should be Sheet A1.01 or revise the next sheet, which is the First Floor plan). 4. Starting with the First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan), in the bottom right corner is an sheet indicator that the sheet is "of 7". Unclear of the meaning of this indicator, since there are more than seven sheets in this set of plans. Either revise to indicate something that makes sense or remove it. 5. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Provide a north arrow, bar scale and indicate the abutting street names. 6. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - If the floor plans, starting with Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor), are at a scale of 3/32" = 1'-0", the same 3/32" = 1'-0" scale is indicated for this sheet, which cannot be correct. Revise the drawing scale for this sheet. 7. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - On the north side the building is encroaching into the retention pond. Revise. 8. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - None of the original civil or architectural plans or the survey indicate the affected FEMA flood zones on the property. Based on a review with Doug King in our Engineering Department, the site (Parcel A) is located within various Velocity Flood Zones. Based on FEMA requirements, only storage may occur below BFE. Need to show on the plans the FEMA flood zone lines. 9. Condition of Approval of the Minor Revision: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the survey and civil site plans shall show the FEMA flood zones. 10. Condition of Approval of the Minor Revision: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil site and landscape plans shall be revised to reflect the modifications approved under this Minor Revision. 11. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Remove landscaping from this sheet, as it is confusing with other information being depicted. 12. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Show proposed setbacks to property lines. Cannot encroach any more than what the CDB approved plan indicated. To this end, it is noted that on the north side, north of Stair Core G, the storage areas and balconies extend westward farther west of the Stair Core G than indicated on the approved CDB plans (see column at R7/8). Based on the civil plans and Sheets A1.01 and A2.01 of the original plans approved by the CDB showing the slight angle of the property in relation to the proposed building, it appears this new building extension will encroach greater than the 15 feet shown on the plans approved by the CDB. Page 1 of 6 • 13. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Show all sidewalks from the building egress points (lobbies, stairs and trash rooms) to the sidewalk within the adjacent rights-of-way. 14. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - There are three trash rooms indicated fronting Coronado Drive. For intent clarification, is the southern trash staging area, as shown on the approved CDB plan, the only pickup point for dumpsters? If so, why then do the middle and northern trash rooms have doors facing Coronado Drive? How will the dumpsters get to the southern trash staging area? Or, is it the intent to have three trash staging areas? 15. Floor plan sheets, starting with Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor), are indicated to be drawn at a scale of 3/32" = 1'-0". However, placing a scale to the plans, the dimensions indicated don't measure up, as they are slightly off (less than what the dimensions indicate). Clarify the scale of the floor plan sheets. 16. Please confirm the handicap accessible route from parking and units to a sidewalk within the abutting rights-of-way is from units on or above the 4th Floor to Elevator 3 out to South Gulfview Boulevard (for those handicap spaces on the north side of the ramp the handicap individuals would need to go up Elevator 4 to the 4th Floor, going over to Elevator 3, going down Elevator 3 to the ground floor to the same exit point). 17. For 102 dwelling units, where the parking requirement is two parking spaces per unit for a total of 204 parking spaces, a total of seven handicap parking spaces area required, in accordance with Section 3-1409.A (only five shown on Sheet A2.01). 18. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) and Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Two parking spaces are show in the northeast corner of the building (Spaces 168 and 169), which do not function internally with adequate/required backup areas/drive aisles, are shown as if these are private garage where the vehicles back into the Coronado Drive right-of-way (which is not permitted by Code), and are not shown with any driveways. No such similar parking spaces were shown on the approved CDB plans. Remove these two parking spaces. 19. First Sheet A2.01 (Site Plan) - Remove the sight visibility triangles from both sides of the southern "driveway", as this is not a vehicular driveway but a trash staging area. 20. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor), Sheet A2.02 (Second Floor) & (should be) Sheet A2.03 (Third Floor) - Columns that are at an angle shall not encroach into parking spaces or drive aisles, each parking space shall measure 9-feet wide by 18-feet long and each bi-directional drive aisle shall be 24-feet wide without encroachment from any objects/structures. See columns at G-5, H-5, H-7, J-5, M- 5, N-5, N-7 and P-5. 21. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Handicap aisle for parking space #139 will require a 44-inch clear width between the corner of the wall and the edge of handicap aisle. 22. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Install stop bars with the word "stop" on the pavement for the minor movements at the 4-way access intersection. In other words keep the driveway and ramp moving while the other two legs of the intersection stops. Page 2 of 6 0 0 23. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 101, 102, 103, 104,105,112,141, 142, 145, 146, 164, 165, 166 and 167. In addition to mirrors to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces, signs must be installed stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" for these parking spaces. 24. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - There appears to be a column indicated within the drive aisle north of Spaces 107 and 121. Clarify/modify. 25. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Spaces 132, 134, 150 and 151 do not meet the requirements of the Code for a 24-foot drive aisle behind these spaces and cannot be counted as required parking (Code does not permit "stacked" parking). You may leave these as parking spaces, which would be assumed that both "stacked" spaces would be for the same dwelling unit owner, but they cannot be counted toward meeting the Code parking requirements of two parking spaces per dwelling unit. Remove the numbering from these spaces. 26. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Since this site is within a velocity flood zone, the fire command room must be relocated to be above BFE. Revise. 27. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Amend the parking number counts in the Legend. 28. Second Sheet A2.01 (First Floor) - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revise. 29. Sheet A2.02 - Remove Spaces 236 and 237 to allow the ramp between levels 2 and 3 to function. 30. Sheet A2.02 - Amend the parking number counts in the Legend. Also, I find no . van accessible spaces on this floor. Remove from Legend. 31. Sheet A2.02 - Unclear why the room next to Space 201 is indicated as "pool equipment", since this is also shown on Sheet A3.03 (should be Sheet A2.03 - Third Floor). 32. Sheet A2.02 and (should be) A2.03 - For parking levels 2 and 3, consider creating a one-way clockwise flow for better circulation and to minimize conflict points for motorists. 33. Sheet A2.02 - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 201, 209, 235 (if wall is installed as part of ramp), 238 (if wall is installed as part of ramp), 258 and 266. In addition to mirrors to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces, signs must be installed stating "Use column- mounted mirrors when backing" for these parking spaces. 34. Sheet A2.02 - There appears to be a column indicated within the drive aisle north of Spaces 203 and 218. Clarify/modify. 35. Sheet A2.02 - The trash rooms in front of Spaces 258 and 266 are inaccessible due to the location of the doorway and the abutting parking spaces. Revise. 36. Sheet A2.02 - The trash room and lobby in front of Spaces 242 and 243 are inaccessible due to the location of the doorways and the abutting parking spaces. Revise. 37. Sheet A2.02 - The lobby adjacent to Space 232 is inaccessible due to the location of the doorway and the abutting parking space. Revise. Page 3 of 6 0 0 38. Sheet A2.02 - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall above the portico (windows/doors) and for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revise. 39. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Revise to be Sheet A2.03. 40. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - The scale of this sheet is indicated as 3/33" _ 1'-0", which is incorrect (see also comment #15 above). 41. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Redesign or install safety devices (such as column-mounted mirrors) where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 301, 309, 358 and 366. In addition to mirrors to aid motorists backing out of parking spaces, signs must be installed stating "Use column-mounted mirrors when backing" for these parking spaces. 42. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - There appears to be a column indicated within the drive aisle north of Spaces 303 and 318. Clarify/modify. 43. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Amend the parking number counts in the Legend. Also, I find no van accessible spaces on this floor. Remove from Legend. 44. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, revise the verbiage on the west side to read "Open Arcade Portico Below". 45. First Sheet A3.03 (Third Floor) - Based on the west elevation on Sheet A3.01, there are openings in the wall above the portico (windows?) and for the garage not indicated on this sheet. Revise. 46. Please confirm the handicap accessible route from parking and units to the pool (common element) is from Elevators 2, 3, 4 and 5 to the courtyard on the 4th Floor and going through the spa (or the fitness center), and that the restrooms in the spa are accessible for the pool. 47. Sheet A2.04 - Is it the intent to have the terrace on the southwest side as a common element accessible to all behind the abutting dwellings (since it is accessible from the pool area) or to divide that portion of this terrace west of the fitness center up as larger private terraces for the two abutting dwelling units? 48. Sheet A2.04 - Different than the question above, is it the intent to have the terrace on the northwest side as a common element accessible to only the three abutting dwellings (since it is not accessible from any common areas) or to divide this terrace up as larger private terraces for the three abutting dwelling units? 49. Sheet A2.04 - There are planters shown extending from the west side of the pool deck area and terraces on the south and north sides of units. Dimension the distance these planters extend from the walls (appears to be approximately 4 - 5 feet). Note: These were not shown on the plans approved by the CDB. 50. First Sheet A2.06 (14th Floor) - Unit B on the north side, shouldn't it be Unit H, in keeping with that indicated on Sheets A2.04 and A2.05? 51. Second Sheet A2.06 (15th Floor) - Renumber this sheet to be Sheet A2.07. 52. Second Sheet A2.06 (15th Floor) - Unit G on the south side should be renumbered as Unit C. Also, all written verbiage for this unit is backwards and can't be read without a mirror. Reverse the verbiage. 53. Sheet A2.07 (16th Floor) - Renumber this sheet to be Sheet A2.08. 54. Sheet A2.07 (16th Floor) - Provide unit numbering and the square footages for these two units (similar to other floors). Page 4 of 6 • • 55. Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - Indicate the exterior materials and colors on the plans. Provide color samples/chips for the proposed exterior color scheme. 56. Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - Building height approved by CDB is 148 feet. Proposed height is now 150 feet. Section 4-406.A.8 does not allow an increase to the height of the building as a Minor Revision. Either reduce to 148 feet to remain under the consideration as a Minor Revision or need to file a new FLD application to increase the building height for potential approval by the CDB. 57. Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - The proposed elevation for Levels 5 and above is much plainer and blander than that approved bey the CDB. The plans approved by the CDB included stepbacks at the 11th, 14t and 15th Levels. The proposed plans, including the incorporation of the ten dwelling units previously on Parcel B, does not provide any similar significant stepbacks except at Level 15, which also plays into this more plainer and blander appearance. Looking for additional architectural detailing to assist with the appearance, such as, but not limited to, mansard roof structures, cornices, brackets, arches, pediments, columns, quoins, pilasters, false balconies, etc. Unclear why metal railings for partial balconies have been introduced toward the center of the building on Levels 8, 9 and 11. Also unclear why the pergolas on Level 16 lack any detail and appear as a flat roof with balcony. Note: This comment and plans will also be discussed with Michael Delk upon his return next week. 58. Sheets A3.01, A3.02, Second Sheet A3.03 and A3.04 - It would be extremely helpful to have the A - R or 1 - 11 station point referencing shown on the appropriate elevation drawings. 59. Sheet A3.01 - On the left hand side on Level 4 there should be a balcony shown for Unit H. 60. Sheet A3.01 - There should be a door to the lobby shown on the one-story stair/elevator tower on the right hand side next to the pool, as well as two pergolas at the pool area (similar to Sheet A3.02). 61. Sheet A3.01 - There should be pergolas shown on the right and left sides for Levels 14 and 15. 62. Sheet A3.02 - Garage door opening must provide a minimum opening height of 8'-2" to meet ADA requirements. Dimension door opening. 63. Sheet A3.02 - On Level 4 there should be a railing shown to the left and right of the center railing for the courtyard. 64. Sheet A3.02 - On Level 4, the elevation for the spa area is not drawn correctly. Windows and railings for balconies are shown where there are none. However, as a blank wall, why can't there be some windows (could be non-usable). 65. Sheet A3.02 - At the base of Level 4, shouldn't there be some banding shown, similar to that shown on Sheet A3.01, Second Sheet A3.03 and Sheet A3.04? 66. Sheet A3.02 - On Level 14, the floor plan for this floor indicates a roof on either side of the "courtyard", yet the elevation shows a blank wall. Revise. 67. Sheet A3.02 - On Level 15, there are some hip roofs that should be detailed with barrel tiles similar to the very top roof structure. Page 5 of 6 w • 68. Second Sheet A3.03 - On the left hand side, the portico on Level 1 should be open, not closed (per Sheet A2.01). 69. Second Sheet A3.03 - On the right hand side, Levels 4 - 14 are not cantilevered from the face of Levels 1 - 3 out as shown, but rather the building on Levels 1 - 3 extend to the same outside face of the wall as Levels 4 - 14 (see floor plan sheets). 70. Second Sheet A3.03 - There appears to be a column on the balcony of Unit B for Levels 5 - 13 not shown (see Sheet A2.05). 71. Second Sheet A3.03 - On Level 14, the floor plan for this floor indicates a roof on either side of the "courtyard", yet the elevation shows a blank wall. Revise. 72. Second Sheet A3.03 - There should be pergolas shown on the right side of Level 14 and in the middle for Level 15. 73. Second Sheet A3.03 - On Level 15, there are some hip roofs that should be detailed with barrel tiles similar to the very top roof structure. 74. Sheet A3.04 - On the right hand side, the portico on Level 1 should be open, not closed (per Sheet A2.01). 75. Sheet A3.04 - On the left hand side, Levels 4 - 14 are not cantilevered from the face of Levels 1 - 3 out as shown, but rather the building on Levels 1 - 3 extend to the same outside face of the wall as Levels 4 - 14 (see floor plan sheets). 76. Sheet A3.04 - There appears to be a column on the balcony of Unit H for Levels 4 -13 not shown (see Sheets A2.04 and A2.05). 77. Sheet A3.04 - On Level 14, the floor plan for this floor indicates a roof on either side of the "courtyard", yet the elevation shows a blank wall. Revise. 78. Sheet A3.04 - There should be pergolas shown on the right side of Level 14 and in the middle for Level 15. 79. Sheet A3.04 - On Level 15, there are some hip roofs that should be detailed with barrel tiles similar to the very top roof structure. 80. Provide documentation that at least 60 percent of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. 81. It is noted that the Minor Revisions submitted include the intent of relocating the 10 dwelling units approved by the CDB on top of a parking garage on Parcel B (accessory to the dwelling units) to Parcel A and that no revisions were submitted for Parcel B. Based on the comments above, Parcel A does not appear capable of providing all the required parking for the 102 dwelling units on Parcel A (at the minimum of two parking spaces per dwelling unit) and some required parking for the dwelling units on Parcel A will be required to be placed on Parcel B. It is further noted that the developer is working with the City for the construction of a parking garage for public parking, which will require an amendment to the Marbella project to add the parking garage on Parcel B. Assuming the City agrees to enter into a "contract" for the parking garage, that structure and site plan will be reviewed later as part of that application. If this does not occur, a new submission for a Minor Revision will be necessary for the parking on Parcel B (accessory to the dwelling units on Parcel A). SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Inactive or Finished Applications\Gulfview S 0325 Lucca Development (T) - Approved\Marbella Minor Revisions - Changes Necessary 4.19.07.doc Page 6 of 6 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:32 AM To: 'Tim' Subject: RE: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Email to & from J. Burdette re... See the attached email. -----Original Message----- From: Tim [mailto:tim@groundfl.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:25 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'Jim Brown' Subject: RE: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Wayne, Good morning, I will call you a little later this morning, I am looking of see if there is any update non the minor amendment submittal and subsequent review for Marbella. At 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella thanks Timothy S. Aebie vice President Ground Floor Engineering Tim@groundfl.com www.groundfl.com 800-738-0525 DISCLAIMER: No expressed or implied warranty is made by Ground Floor Engineering, Inc. regarding the accuracy or reliability of electronically stored data. We reserve the right to modify, update, and develop electronically stored information without notice and assume no liability for any errors resulting from use of same. User agrees to corroborate the data to determine its accuracy for the planned use. Although we strive to make certain the data is virus free, we assume no responsibility for any damage caused by installation. Use of this data indicates that User accepts the above conditions. This e-mail contains proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately alert Tim Aebie by reply e-mail and then delete this message and its attachments. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:01 PM To: tim@groundfl.com Subject: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Tim - Oops, attached is an Amended Development Order. Wayne <<Gulfview S 325 Amended Development Order 6.16.06.doc>> 1 • 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:35 PM To: 'Hunraf@aol.com' Subject: RE: Joe Burdette Re: Marbella Minor Amendments Joe - I have two building permits I have to review after I finish this one staff report (which has to be done tomorrow morning). After that, then I will work on the Marbella Minor Revision. Based on some preliminary review I had to do in order to provide some information for the proposed parking garage, I will have comments that will need revisions to the plans. But, I will detail out the comments and let you know. I hope to finish this week with the review. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:26 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Joe Burdette Re: Marbella Minor Amendments Wayne Any word on the Marbella minor amendments? Joe See what's free at AOL.com. 4/10/2007 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:04 AM To: 'Hunraf@aol.com' Subject: RE: Marbella Request for Extension of D.O. Response to Density Question next. Minor amendment later. I have a different Minor Amendment request to work on before Marbella. -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:01 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: Marbella Request for Extension of D.O. Thanks Wayne.... any luck on the minor amendments for Marbella? Joe AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 3/14/2007 ? . • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 9:59 AM To: 'Hunraf@aol.com' Subject: Marbella Request for Extension of D.O. Joe - Attached is the Time Extension Development Order. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne -----Original Message----- . From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:58 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Marbella Request for Extension of D.O. FYI. mld -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:49 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: luke.luccainc@comcast.net Subject: Joe Burdette - Marbella Request for Extension of D.O. Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida, 33756 Re: Marbella - FLD2005-02021 / TDR2005-03020 - 325 South Gulfview Boulevard Michael Please accept this letter as a request for a 1-year extension for the above referenced Development Order for the Marbella on behalf of LUCCA Development, LLC This request is based on the land development code section 4.04 and the specific criteria for our request is as follows: 1. The developer is in the process of pre-sales and market conditions have been slow. Construction lenders' have increased the number of pre-sales required to fund construction loans and this has hampered him well. 2. Increase in construction costs have forced him to make minor changes to his architectural construction drawings in order to keep his costs in line while still maintaining his commitment 3/14/2007 ,., • • Page 2 of 2 to a quality product. Those drawings have been submitted to the city as a request for a minor amendment and are currently being reviewed by the planning department. 3. He has also had to change architects to a firm better suited for the production drawings and this has also caused him delay. 4. He is currently in negotiations for with the city for a public/private garage on a portion of this project. Should those negotiations fail, he will need time to reevaluate what direction he needs to go in as far as maintaining his 2 parking spaces per unit (which he now exceeds and wants for his project). Remembering that, although the project as currently approved, provides for more than 2 parking spaces per unit, it was approved under the code that only required 1.5 spaces per unit. The drawings now in for minor amendments shows 195 spaces per unit under the building, which well exceeds the 1.5 requirement (which would be 153). Should negotiations with the city fail, it is his intent to put additional parking for the condo owners and perhaps an amenity package on the site proposed for the garage. It is anticipated that it will take well into this summer to bring this project to the City Council for their approval and committement to purchase 300 of the spaces. With all of this in mind, he would ask for the full 1-year extension that you are allowed to give him as a first extension (remembering that he currently does meet the 2-parking spaces per unit). If you have any questions or need any additional information, call me or email me and I will get it to you immediately. Thanks for your help as always Joe AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 3/14/2007 r - a CITY OF CLEARWATER h POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mr. Joe Burdette 618 Pineland Avenue Belleair, FL 33756 March 13, 2007 RE: Case Nos. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005-03020/PLT2005-00010 Time Extension Development Order 325 S. Gulfview Boulevard (including 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 346 and 350 Hamden Drive) Dear Mr. Burdette: On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with an increase in height from 30' to 148' for Parcel "A" (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck); an increase in height of a parapet wall from 30" to seven feet (7') for Parcel "B"; to permit a building within the required sight visibility triangle along Coronado Drive and 50' Street; and an increase in height from 30' to 64' for Parcel "B" (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.; a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [ 116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist (T) District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C; Preliminary Plat; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request, unless the CDB approval specified a different time frame. The CDB approval required the application for a building permit within two years of the date the CDB approved the request (July 19, 2007). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On February 21, 2007, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited the problem of rising construction costs, changing architects and lagging market conditions. Since the approval of this project, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" t March 13, 2007 Burdette - Page Two Section 6-109.13 was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. In considering the above changes to the Code and Beach by Design, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension to January 19, 2008, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your property at 325 S. Gulfview Boulevard (including 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 346 and 350 Hamden Drive). In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michae elk, CP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentI C D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicationsI Guljview S 0325 Lucca Development (7) - ApprovedlGulfview S 325 Time Ext. Dev. Order 3.13.07.doc Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:58 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Marbella Request for Extension of D.O. FYI. mld -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:49 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: luke.luccainc@comcast.net Subject: Joe Burdette - Marbella Request for Extension of D.O. Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida, 33756 Re: Marbella - FLD2005-02021 / TDR2005-03020 - 325 South Gulfview Boulevard Michael Please accept this letter as a request for a 1-year extension for the above referenced Development Order for the Marbella on behalf of LUCCA Development, LLC This request is based on the land development code section 4.04 and the specific criteria for our request is as follows: 1. The developer is in the process of pre-sales and market conditions have been slow. Construction lenders' have increased the number of pre-sales required to fund construction loans and this has hampered him well. 2. Increase in construction costs have forced him to make minor changes to his architectural construction drawings in order to keep his costs in line while still maintaining his commitment to a quality product. Those drawings have been submitted to the city as a request for a minor amendment and are currently being reviewed by the planning department. 3. He has also had to change architects to a firm better suited for the production drawings and this has also caused him delay. 4. He is currently in negotiations for with the city for a public/private garage on a portion of this project. Should those negotiations fail, he will need time to reevaluate what direction he needs to go in as far as maintaining his 2 parking spaces per unit (which he now exceeds and wants for his project). Remembering that, although the project as currently approved, provides for more than 2 parking spaces per unit, it was approved under the code that only required 1.5 spaces per 2/23/2007 .y.- 0 • Page 2 of 2 unit. The drawings now in for minor amendments shows 195 spaces per unit under the building, which well exceeds the 1.5 requirement (which would be 153). Should negotiations with the city fail, it is his intent to put additional parking for the condo owners and perhaps an amenity package on the site proposed for the garage. It is anticipated that it will take well into this summer to bring this project to the City Council for their approval and committement to purchase 300 of the spaces. With all of this in mind, he would ask for the full 1-year extension that you are allowed to give him as a first extension (remembering that he currently does meet the 2-parking spaces per unit). If you have any questions or need any additional information, call me or email me and I will get it to you immediately. Thanks for your help as always Joe AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 2/23/2007 d N OF f.- 4 { w f { -?' zo4 t •. Yg "' ?3?' fi+, ..1'.` +iaR4.- r Vi w? .irr. _ ..z_r^.41y?t-` ?' V t _ tidy ?.. ALML IN, :t yr. - id.f.tiy - ? kijie-L? 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 9:37 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: marbells DRC - Joe Burdette FYI. mld -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 4:16 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Fwd: marbells DRC - Joe Burdette Michael Here is the narrative letter to go with the Marbella drawings in case you did not receive this from Ground floor Engineering 2/9/2007 • • Wells, Wayne From: Tim [tim@groundfl.com] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 2:24 PM To: 'Jim Brown' Cc: Hunraf@aol.com; jburdette505@tampabay.rr.com Subject: marbells DRC =_-?J t rev-Letter to DRC rev-Letter to DRC defining cha... defining cha... Joe, See attached revised letter. thanks Timothy S. Aebie Vice President Ground Floor Engineering Tim@groundfl.com www.groundfl.com 800-738-0525 0 0 14 GROUNDF LOOR ENGINEERING Marbella Condominium RECEIVED FEB 0 8 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAiER BUILDING AREA TABULATIONS of Originally approved plan LEVEL NUMBER OF UNITS PARKING - LEVEL 1 0 PARKING - LEVEL 2 0 LEVEL3 9 LEVEL 4 9 LEVEL 5 9 LEVEL6 9 LEVEL7 9 LEVEL 8 9 LEVEL .9 9 LEVEL 10, 9 LEVEL 11 5 LEVEL 12 - PENTHOUSE 5 LEVEL 13 - PENTHOUSE 5 LEVEL 14- PENTHOUSE 3 LEVEL 15 - PENTHOUSE 2 TOTAL BUILDING RESIDENTIAL UNITS TOTAL BUILDING PARKING: TOTAL ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA: TOTAL TERRACE AND VERANDA BUILDING AREA: ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA(SF) 37,878 37,878 19,292 19,292 19,292 19,292 19,292 19,292 19,292 19,292 10,663 10,663 10,663 6,798 6,798 92 UNITS TERRACE AREA(SF) 680 850 5,380 2,446 2,446 2,446 2,446 2,446 2,446 2,446 2,240 1,808 1,808 1,472 1,472 141 SPACES (INCLUDING 5 HC SPACES) ADDITIONAL 2ND SPACES FOR OWNER ON 5TH NORTH PARCEL REQUIRED PARKING: 138 SPACES PROVIDED PARKING: 1411 SPACES 282,122 SF. 32,832 SF. 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee I FL 34761 800-738-0525 1407-517-4140 Fax 1 groundfl.com 1 CA# 26018 BUILDING AREA TABULATIONS of new layout LEVEL NUMBER OF UNITS ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA(SF) TERRACE AREA(SF) PARKING - LEVEL 1 0 38,530 613 PARKING - LEVEL 2 0 38,530 613 PARKING - LEVEL 3 0 38,530 0 LEVEL 4 7 21,093 18,498 LEVEL 5 9 20,752 2,848 LEVEL 6 9 20,752 2,848 LEVEL 7 9 20,752 2,848 LEVEL 8 9 20,752 2,848 LEVEL 9 9 20,752 2,848 LEVEL 10 9 20,752 2,848 LEVEL 11 9 20,752 2,848 LEVEL 12 9 20,752 2,848 LEVEL 13 - PENTHOUSE 9 20,752 2,848 LEVEL 14 - PENTHOUSE 7 16,834 4,358 LEVEL 15 - PENTHOUSE 5 11,591 4,358 LEVEL 16 - PENTHOUSE 2 6,688 3,674 TOTAL BUILDING RESIDENTIAL UNITS : 102 UNITS TOTAL BUILDING PARKING: 195 SPACES (INCLUDING 5 HC SPACES) ADDITIONAL 2ND SPACES FOR OWNER ON 5TH NORTH PARCEL REQUIRED PARKING: 153 SPACES PROVIDED PARKING: 195 SPACES (DELETE SPACES 168 AND 169) TOTAL ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA: 358,564 SF. TOTAL TERRACE AND VERANDA BUILDING AREA. 57,746 SF. 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee FL 34761 800-738-0525 (407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com CA# 26018 CONDOMINIUMS FLORIDA BUILDING CODE: 2004 EDITION FFPC 2004 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION RESIDENTIAL HIGHRISE ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA 358,564 SF. TERRACE AREA 57.746 SF. TOTAL BUILDING AREA 416,310 SF. OCCUPANT LOAD : APT PORTIONS - 200 SF PER PERSON GROSS ELEVATION : 8.0' GARAGE ELEV. FLOOD ZONE (V-13): FEMA = 13.0' BUILDING HEIGHT : I W-W ABOVE FEMA ELEV. MAX. 16 STORIES PLUS ROOF AND ELEVATOR MECHANICAL LEVEL TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION : TYPE 11 ALLOWABLE FLOOR LOAD : SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS DESIGN WIND LOADS : DETERMINED BY THE PROVISIONS OF ASCE 7 ('04 FLA BLD CODE) FULLY FIRE SPRINKLERED BLDG PER FFPC 2004 FULLY FIRE ALARM PROTECTED BLDG PER FFPC 2004 As a summary please note that within the modified plans the following items have changed. 1. Increased from 2 parking levels to 3. 2. Increased parking count from 144 to 195. 3. Increases Handicapped spaces from 5 to 6. 4. Increased unit count from 92 units to 102 units. 5. Elevation colors have remained as originally approved. 6. Current building height is 150' above FEMA elevation as approved. 7. Added story from 15 floors to 16 floors. 8. Landscaping remains as approved. 9. Trash location and pickup remains the. same as approved. 10. Civil remains the same, setbacks remain as approved. 11. Added private garage parking at grade along Coronado. 12. Parking configuration and Column placement are as previously approved. 13. All lifesafety and fire issues remain as approved. Timothy S. Aebie Vice President Ground Floor Engineering Timagroundfl.com www.groundfl.com 800-738-0525 10125 W. Colonial Drivel Suite 212 1 Ocoee I FL 34761 800-738-0525 1407-517-4140 Fax I groundfl.com I CA# 26018 N 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: Gulfview S 325 Amended Develop... Phil - Wells, Wayne Friday, January 12, 2007 5:04 PM 'Phil Stock' RE: Marrabella parcel The original approval was for a two year time frame to submit for a building permit the error in the Development Order was brought to our attention, we amended the Development Order (see attached). The expiration date for this project is July 19, This should help you. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Phil Stock [mailto:PStock@irr.com] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 3:46 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marrabella parcel Hey Wayne, I am doing an appraisal on the above reference property. The Development Order I have expired on July 19, 2006 and need written approve from the Community Development Coordinator for a one year extension. I am assuming from your prior response that the extension was granted? Thanks for your help. Phil Stock 813-287-1000 ext. 155 From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 9:05 AM To: 'bhoolihan@Arcap.com' Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: Marrabella parcel Mr. Hoolihan - Case No. FLD2005-02021 was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on July 19, 2005, for the above referenced project. A total of 102 attached dwelling units was approved, with 92 attached dwelling units to be located on "Parcel All (property located between S. Gulfview and Coronado Drive), 10 attached dwelling units to be located on "Parcel B" (property located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive) and no dwelling units to be located on "Parcel C" (property located between Hamden Drive and Clearwater Harbor). The approved overall density for this project is 43.04 dwelling units per acre, which was based on the Termination of Status of Nonconformity and conversion of overnight accommodation units to dwelling units and a Transfer of Development Rights. A building permit to construct the project must be submitted by July 19, 2007, unless a time extension is granted. When 2007. 0 0 Wayne Wells Planner III -----Original Message----- From: Bill Hoolihan [mailto:bhoolihan@Arcap.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 10:57 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marbella parcel How can I confirm the current and/or potential dwelling unit density for the above proposed project located in the Beach by Design project? Bill Hoolihan Hoolihan Realty Group Phone: 305.663.6525 From: Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com [mailto:Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 7:30 AM To: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com Cc: Bill Hoolihan Subject: FW: Marbella parcel Wayne can you assist Mr. Hoolihan? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Hoolihan [mailto:bhoolihan@Arcap.com] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 3:31 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Marbella parcel How can I confirm the current and/or potential dwelling unit density for the above proposed project located in the Beach by Design project? Bill Hoolihan Hoolihan Realty Group Phone: 305.663.6525 2 . • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Hunraf@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:27 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: Re: 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Wayne Should have the main building back to you the first of next week for minor revisions. As to the garage, I have spoken to Michael and going back to CDB for the garage is no problem. Michael and I agreed that we should just wait and see if the Marbella owners and the city can reach a business deal first and then figure out the process for the garage. Michael also understands that the main building (102 units) cannot be affected by this as we cannot go back to CDB on that building. Will keep you informed as we go Joe 12/6/2006 ,? ? • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:17 AM To: 'Hunraf@aol.com' Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Joe - Still waiting to receive this proposed Minor Revision. Michael and I have spoken regarding this project. The project as approved had accessory parking for the attached dwellings on this property between Coronado and Hamden Drives. The addition of public parking is deemed as adding a new use (parking garage and lots) not anticipated under the prior approval and would require the review of a new FLD case for CDB approval, where such issues as design, height and any other issues would be reviewed in conformance with Code and Beach by Design provisions. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:59 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: garry@groundfl.com; johnny-yang@groundfl.com; tim@groundfl.com; jim@groundfl.com; luke.luccainc@comcast.net; slatek@comcast.net Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Wayne We will be submitting the Marbella Project (FLD 2005-02021 / TDR 325 Gulfview Boulevard) to you for minor revisions this Thursday. As you may recall, there are two buildings in this project and we will only be submitting the front tower (102 units) at this time. In the original filing, the front building contained 92 units over parking and the back building contained 10 units over parking. After meeting with Michael Delk, he is allowing us to move all the units (102) into the front building that we will be submitting for minor revisions. The front building will contain 147 parking spaces. The back building will become a garage and contain a minimum of 57 parking spots. The developers are currently in negotiations with the city to provide the city with additional parking spaces. That process has just begun and I have no idea how long it might take. We can build as many as 396 parking spaces and stay within the 64 foot height (and setbacks) that was approved for that back building. We have shown the rendering of the back building to Michael and he is fine with it as staying in character with the original approval. A minor amendment request will follow for that building as soon as negotiations with the city are concluded one way or another. But as I said, we will at 12/6/2006 . ? Page 2 of 2 a? least build 57 parking spaces in it to meet our 2 per unit parking requirement and more if the city agrees to the developer's offer. If you have any questions, please give me a call 458-4528 Joe 12/6/2006 1, Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 1:02 PM To: 'Tim' Subject: RE: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella I am assuming that you are talking about architectural drawings only, which would not need to be signed and sealed. -----Original Message----- From: Tim [mailto:tim@groundfl.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:09 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Does anything have to be signed and sealed? Timothy S. Aebie vice President Ground Floor Engineering Tim@groundfl.com www.groundfl.com 800-738-0525 -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:01 PM To: tim@groundfl.com Subject: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Tim - Oops, attached is an Amended Development Order. Wayne <<Gulfview S 325 Amended Development Order 6.16.06.doc>> 1 0 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:01 PM To: 'tim@groundfl.com' Subject: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Tim - Oops, attached is an Amended Development Order. Wayne "EN Gulfview S 325 Amended Develop... 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 11:55 AM To: 'tim@groundfl.com' Subject: FLD2005-02021, 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Marbella Tim - Attached are the documents we talked about Wayne Wells, AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 (727) 562-4504 Gulfview S 325 Gulfview S 325 Development Ord... Staff Report 07... • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 11:57 AM To: Pullin, Sharon Subject: RE: phone call done -----Original Message----- From: Pullin, Sharon Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:46 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: phone call Wayne, Tim Aebie is calling about Marbella. He has questions about comments submitted to DRC. His number is 800/738-0525. Let me know if this is not your case and I will forward to appropriate planner. Thanks, Sharon Pullin Senior Staff Assistant 727-562-4579 Planning Department sharon.pullin@myclearwater.com 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Hunraf@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:59 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: garry@groundfl.com; johnny-yang@groundfl.com; tim@groundfl.com; jim@groundfl.com; luke.luccainc@comcast.net; slatek@comcast.net Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Marbella Wayne We will be submitting the Marbella Project (FLD 2005-02021 / TDR 325 Gulfview Boulevard) to you for minor revisions this Thursday. As you may recall, there are two buildings in this project and we will only be submitting the front tower (102 units) at this time. In the original filing, the front building contained 92 units over parking and the back building contained 10 units over parking. After meeting with Michael Delk, he is allowing us to move all the units (102) into the front building that we will be submitting for minor revisions. The front building will contain 147 parking spaces. The back building will become a garage and contain a minimum of 57 parking spots. The developers are currently in negotiations with the city to provide the city with additional parking spaces. That process has just begun and I have no idea how long it might take. We can build as many as 396 parking spaces and stay within the 64 foot height (and setbacks) that was approved for that back building. We have shown the rendering of the back building to Michael and he is fine with it as staying in character with the original approval. A minor amendment request will follow for that building as soon as negotiations with the city are concluded one way or another. But as I said, we will at least build 57 parking spaces in it to meet our 2 per unit parking requirement and more if the city agrees to the developer's offer. If you have any questions, please give me a call 458-4528 Joe 11/30/2006 /, • a LONG RVNGE. PLANNING Df:VGLOPMBNr IZEVII?W • CITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posy Orricr Box 4748, CLrnkWnnat Fi.o(tinn 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL Sravicaa Biiilnuvc, 100 Souni Mvrrru: Av( NUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELF1 LONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 June 16, 2006 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE: Amended Development Order - FLD2005-02021/TDR2005-03020 325 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with an increase in height from 30' to 148' for Parcel "A" (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck); an increase in height of a parapet wall from 30" to seven feet (7') for Parcel "B"; to permit a building within the required sight visibility triangle along Coronado Drive and 50' Street; and an increase in height from 30' to 64' for Parcel "B" (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof'deck) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.; a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist (T) District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C; Preliminary Plat; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C. 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for a Transfer of Development Rights per Section 4-1402; 3. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for a Transfer of Development Rights per Section 4-1403; 4. The proposal complies with the Termination of Status as a Non-conformity per Section 6-109.C. 5. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 6. The proposal is in compliance with the requirements of Beach by Design. 7. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. I IONK I IIIM.\kD, Al:M )1,' ](nix Unr:\:?, (;"I N(aILNir:%IBFN I Ic,l-r I I:?>ni:rux, C(,r cu. ucau(i:r, Iiii.i.Jc,xwx, (;()I x(.11.\ir:>1IWN ® (:, I'f:rr:r, Cuc \c:nAntWWR "I"(u:,U. FNIPI M MEN V AND Arrir,m:crire i\(;1 H,.N 1:1"' June 16, 2006 Zayac - Page 2 Conditions of Approval: 1. That evidence of filing of a final plat with Pinellas County be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 2. That all building permits are applied for within two years (July 19, 2007) of CDB approval and that all cert ificates of occupancy are applied for within two years to receipt of the first building permit; 3. That a sidewalks which matches the City's Beach Walk plan with regard to materials be installed per City standards and specifications; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to signs attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final Comprehensive Sign Program package (as required) submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any sign permits which includes that: a. All signs be designed as part of an overall theme that respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building; b. All signs consist of design, colors, materials, size, shape and methods of illumination which reinforce the overall design of the fagade; c. All attached signs are installed so the method of installation is concealed or made an integral part of the design of the sign; d. All wall signs be located on flat, unadorned parts of a fagade such as the horizontal band between the storefront and second floor or on windows, awning flaps, fascia, etc.; and e. The letter size, letter and word spacing, font style and other design elements of all signs create an overall high quality aesthetic appearance. 6. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed. along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. That revised plans be submitted which accurately depict all required erosion and sediment control techniques; 8. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 9. That all Traffic Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 10. That Open Space and Recreation Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of buildings permits or final plat (as applicable); 11. That a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 12. That the "Tree Removal" calculations be revised to reflect that palms are replaced at one inch per palm if they are greater than 10' of clear trunk; 13. That the arborists field notes are transferred in "typeset" on the Tree Inventory Plan and submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 14. That a revised site plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits which provides traffic control devices for vehicles approaching the tops and bottoms of garage ramps at 90- degree angles and that shows all drive aisles at a minimum of 24-feet in width; and 0 0 June 16, 2006 Zayac - Page 3 15. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives and being transferred to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard, be recorded with a notarized copy submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) two 2 years of Flexible Development approval (by July 19, 20"2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one (1) year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one (1) additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 2, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft(a)myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S0325 Lucca Development (7) - Approve&Gulfview S 325 Amended Development Order 616 06doc • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 4:44 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail); Joe Burdette (E-mail) Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Amended Development Order for FLD2005-02021/TDR2005-03020, 325 South Gulfview Boulevard Keith/Joe - Joe brought to our attention inconsistencies with dates in the Development Order for the above project. The Community Development Board (CDB) granted approval on July 19, 2005, with a condition of approval that building permits would need to be submitted within two years of CDB approval (which would be July 19, 2007). We have corrected the dates in an amended Development Order for your information and files (see attached). The original of this amended Development Order is being mailed to Keith. Wayne E?J Gulfview S 325 Amended Develop... • . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Hunraf@aol.com Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:25 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael; luke.luccainc@comcast.net; slatek@comcast.net; keith@keithzayac.com; Ehooper1 @aol.com Subject: Joe Burdette - URGENT - Re: Marbella Project Subject: FLD2005-02021 / TDR2005-03020 - 325 South Gulfview Boulevard Wayne Reference the above project (Marbella), we need some confirmation. We aksed for a 2-year D.O as is indicated in Condition 2 of the D.O. which gives us until June 21, 2007 to apply for permits. That is what we asked for at the CDB and that is what was approved. However, in the fourth paragraph from the end of the D.O. it says, "an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of Flexible Development approval (by July 19, 2006)." Would you please take a look at that as soon as possible and let me know where this stands. This is, as you know, now become a critical issue. Thanks Joe 6/16/2006 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 2:18 PM To: Troy Perdue (E-mail) Subject: Cases FLD2005-02021, TDR2005-03020 & PLT2005-00010 - 325 South Gulfview Blvd. Troy - On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board approved the above referenced cases, which was for a total of 102 attached dwelling units, with 16 conditions of approval. Of the total number of dwelling units approved, 92 units will be located within the building on Parcel A and 10 units within the building on Parcel B. Should you need any additional information, feel free to contact me. Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 21, 2005 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 RE: Development Order - FLD2005-02021 / TDR2005-03020 - 325 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with an increase in height from 30' to 148' for Parcel "A" (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck); an increase in height of a parapet wall from 30" to seven feet (7') for Parcel "B"; to permit a building within the required sight visibility triangle along Coronado Drive and 5`h Street; and an increase in height from 30' to 64' for Parcel "B" (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.; a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist (T) District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C; Preliminary Plat; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C. 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for a Transfer of Development Rights per Section 4-1402; 3. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for a Transfer of Development Rights per Section 4-1403; 4. The proposal complies with the Termination of Status as a Non-conformity per Section 6-109.C. 5. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 6. The proposal is in compliance with the requirements of Beach by Design. 7. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. BR1AN i. AUNGST, MAYOR FRAUNK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYC ElLMILION, COUNCRAIE;AIBER BILL JONSON, CoUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EmPLOYMENT ANI-) AFFIRMATIVE AcnoN EMPLOYER" Conditions of Approval: 1. That evidence of filing of a final plat with Pinellas County be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 2. That all building permits are applied for within two years (June 21, 2007) of CDB approval and that all certificates of occupancy are applied for within two years to receipt of the first building permit; 3. That a sidewalks which matches the City's Beach Walk plan with regard to materials be installed per City standards and specifications; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to signs attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final Comprehensive Sign Program package (as required) submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any sign permits which includes that: a. All signs be designed as part of an overall theme that respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building; b. All signs consist of design, colors, materials, size, shape and methods of illumination which reinforce the overall design of the facade; c. All attached signs are installed so the method of installation is concealed or made an integral part of the design of the sign; d. All wall signs be located on flat, unadorned parts of a fagade such as the horizontal band between the storefront and second floor or on windows, awning flaps, fascia, etc.; and e. The letter size, letter and word spacing, font style and other design elements of all signs create an overall high quality aesthetic appearance. 6. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. That revised plans be submitted which accurately depict all required erosion and sediment control techniques; 8. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 9. That all Traffic Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 10. That Open Space and Recreation Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of buildings permits or final plat (as applicable); 11. That a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 12. That the "Tree Removal" calculations be revised to reflect that palms are replaced at one inch per palm if they are greater than 10' of clear trunk; 13. That the arborists field notes are transferred in "typeset" on the Tree Inventory Plan and submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 14. That a revised site plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits which provides traffic control devices for vehicles approaching the tops and bottoms of garage ramps at 90- degree angles and that shows all drive aisles at a minimum of 24-feet in width; and 15. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives and being transferred to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard, be recorded with a notarized copy submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 401 ' Y ? L r 16. Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of Flexible Development approval (by July 19, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one (1) year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one (1) additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 2, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michae el , Planning Director JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP PC-'-r a')as -060 10 ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON LEANNE LETIZE ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A.R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, 1R. AUDREY B. RAUCHWAY DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DEWS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS PHILIP M. SHASTEEN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO. 45605.109046 July 19, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 Re: Case No. FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; and PLT2005-00010 Dear Wayne: This letter shall serve as a supplement to the application of the referenced case. Specifically, our client has agreed to include the attached language in the appropriate homeowners' documents when the property is ultimately developed. The purpose of including this language is to assure that any successors and assigns of the property are aware of the obligation to put unit owners on notice that abutting properties may redevelop, or otherwise impact their use. The language is being put in at the request of an abutting property owner, and with the full agreement of the applicant. The language is as follows: "The Unit Owners acknowledge that Hotel Condominium is being constructed next to existing nonresidential uses. The Unit Owners understand that the existing businesses intend to be, good neighbors, but there may be situations that may cause annoyances, which are either part of their normal business operations or are beyond the control of those neighbors. Specifically, without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, the existing operation located to the west of the Hotel Condominium includes, without limitation, the following: sales of alcoholic CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. 403 EAST MADISON STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) SUITE 400 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756-5643 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-1100) TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 0 0 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW City of Clearwater Attn: Mr. Wayne Wells July 19, 2005 Page 2 beverages, outdoor dining, outdoor lighting, late night dining, live and recorded outdoor music, kitchen ventilation fans, air-conditioning equipment, parking operations (including for late departing employees), garbage pickup, deliveries, and maintenance. The Unit Owners understand that the activities of the existing businesses will be conducted into the indefinite future and further acknowledge that the existing businesses have established rights which cannot be challenged unless the operators are not in compliance with the ordinances of the City of Clearwater. The Unit Owners further acknowledge that the properties surrounding the Hotel Condominium may be redeveloped in the future, and that they do not have vista ownership or view corridor property rights over any surrounding properties that would preclude or limit the subsequent development of adjoining properties." I appreciate your accepting this supplement to the referenced application and placing the original in the City's permanent file. Very tr yours, E.D. Armstrong III EDA:afs cc: Luke Castrogiovanni Harry Cline, Esq. 350742 Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning May 12, 2005 Mr. Mark Parry City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith(@keithzavac.com ORIGINAL RE: 325 S. GULFVIEW BLVD. FLD 2005-02021 Dear Mr. Parry: i1Q) MAY 12 2005 Enclosed please find 15 copies of the following information in response to staff DRC comments including the following information: ENGINEERING CONDITION 1. The future 7-ft sidewalk has been added to the Coronado Drive and driveway aprons on both parcel A and B, revised to outside of sidewalk. 2. The dimensions are correct however the curve table has been added to the site plan sheets which correspond to the '"C' values listed on the property lines. These tables indicate the lengths along each property line curve. 3. No parking signs have been added to the solid waste pickup area. 4. The 8-inch outfall pipe has been revised to DIP. 5. The sanitary sewer connections have been relocated to the Coronado side based on Beach Walk plans. 6. A note has been added to the driveway concrete calling for 3000 psi with 6x6/10x10 wwm. 7. The sanitary cleanout has been updated. 8. The water and sanitary services have been revised to connect to the future water lines associates with Beach Walk project. 9. Reclaimed water services are shown on the plans. FIRE CONDITION 1. Based on the upsizing of lines with the Beach Walk project there appears to be more than adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes. 0 *ORIGINAL 2. Additional fire hydrants have been added to the project to obtain maximum 300 ft spacing. 3. A note is on the utility plan regarding underground mains to be constructed per NFPA 241. I = =1 4. A standpipe has been added to parcel C. 5. The project is a condominium project with no other uses. MAY 12 2005 LANDSCAPING 'IPA~' =1F?' 1. Additional trees have been added along the project facade, and landscape plan revised to clarify hedges and foundation plantings along buildings. LAND RESOURCE CONDITION 1. The plans have been revised to show the palm trees to be removed "and relocated". 2. The top of bank has been revised as requested to preserves trees. 3. The tree barrier has been revised to City standards. 4. The palms have been revised so that all palms removed as shown on the plans are to be relocated. 5. The arborist field notes have been transferred on the Tree Inventory Plan. STORMWATER CONDITION 1. The stotmwater calculations for Parcel A have been revised to show treatment for the first '/" of runoff from the site along with attenuation for the 25 year 1 hour storm event. The treatment volume is included within the attenuation volume. 2. The stormwater calculations for Parcel B have been revised to show treatment for the first 3/" of runoff from the site only due to the direct discharge into the Bay. SOLID WASTE CONDITION 1. Solid waste will be handled on parcel A by at the driveway accessible trash room at the southeast comer of the building. Solid waste for parcel B will be handled by the trash -room at the -northeast -corner _of the -building with a _dumpster rollout {gad _at curbside. Recycling will also be located in the trash rooms. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONDITION 1. The turning movements have been added to the architectural floor plans. 2. The garages will have mechanical rollup gates that have been revised to be -approximately 40-ft from -back-edge of sidewalk. 0 0 ORIGINAL 3. Due to the future Beach Walk plans, there is now no room for an off-street loading area -along -Coronado Drive. The -moving and delivery trucks will be required to -pull into the 40 ft driveway throat before the gates on a temporary basis to off load. 4. It is noted that the vertical height of the garage much be a minimum 8'-2". 5. The stacked parking spaces have been deleted from the parking count. 1 - i 1?. 'it is my understanding that the occupational licenses have-been clarified directly with the applicant for the project and is complete. idE_ The application and plans have been revised to show*dwelling units. t?i?2. The.parcel ID numbers have been corrected on the-plans. ? 13. We request that a condition of the DO is that a unity of title will be filed prior to construction plan approval. 14. The surveys have been re-labeled as requested. ,---1'5. It donor site survey has been clarified to include only lots 1,11 and 12. ,1,/16. The ownership list has been relabeled as attachment A ownership list. -,"'_'17. Sheets A & B now include "Sender Site" in title block. 1/48. Sheets have been revised to be oriented in same direction. -be submitted. ,There-are-no-FAR'sfor-nonresidential-uses. associated with -this -project. 5. There are no -known -utility -easements shown -on the surrey. 6. A -note -is -on the site plan stating that all lighting will be attached to the -proposed building. Signage comments are noted and will be incorporated into the separate comprehensive sign package. t'8_ A note -has been added to the plans regarding conduit placement for future utilities. -? 9. A note-has-been added-to-the plans about screening or l?aintin9 Utility equipment. 6. The civil data table has been revised regarding the number of units. MAY 12 2005 ZONI G CONDITION ?1. An updated map of sender and receiver sites has been added. ., 2. The project contains only condominium units and services so no other gross floor areas are devoted to other uses. 3. A note is on the site plan that calls for a separate comprehensive sign application- to ---'l 9. The arcade setback has been dimensioned on Parcel A. 20. The parcel B building is 50 ft high as shown on the site plan. `__,21. The parking spaces have been clarified and broken out by parcels on the site plan. The number of units on each parcel has been clarified on each parcel. 3. It is noted that termination of status as a non-conformity for the donor site will require it's own application. ? 2` . The landscape plans have been labeled parcel A & B. A note has been added to the site plan calling for parcel C to remain in current condition. ? It is nay understanding that all the comments regarding density and units allowed have been clarified directly with applicant and the submittal has been revised to 101 -dwelling -units. -27. A-matenal -and -color-list -has-been -added. /28. -Access into the building and -parking will -be controlled with -roll -down gates that -have X. 29. been added to site plans. The architectural paved areas are outside, but will be under overhangs as noted on the -site -plan in -some conditions. The overhands -have been clarified -with heavy dashed lines. 30. The site data table on the site plan does include parcel C. /31. The open space calculations have been reviewed and appear to be correct as now shown on site plan. Z32. The dimensions are correct, however the curve data table has been added to both side-plans showing the-property line arc lengths as noted by "C" values. AeithE. ac, P. €., RlA ? President Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. MAY 12 2005 IL Z 1` V .wl i.. ORIGINAL 04/21/2005 11:02 705430--'-3 LUCCA INC PAGE 02 To, Mark Perry Fm: Luke Castrogiovanni Re: Square Footage of Marbella Site Date: April 21, 2005 Sim Howard Johnson. 325 South Gulfview Roma 326 Coronado Total Site B Triplex(3 Apartments existing) 345 Coronado Albatros 346 Hamden Tropicana 347-353 Coronado/350 Hamden b t7d ' Total Site C Albatros and Tropicana Waterkont Strip Licensed # of Units Allowed 53,712+/.. 64 y g 7,50 0+/- ? 5 6.8 vqx-7 6 ""• 1 :4 7 -I CJY 1 -1 61,212.39 70 r7 5 v 56 6,600+/- 0 6 13,200+ 12 X 1 Z 20,543+ 32 ?S.zo''??ISSGoz O•"f?3 clo a? l S ?,;,? x ''r 0. `i 7 C -? C)jX l? Z 40,561.13 52 141 1381.59 TDR Site Baylawn 406 Hamden Back St. Caf6 401 Coronado 13,203 20 6,600 Total 19,803.47 TRD 18 *Additional land on waterfrout not surveyed is approximately 600 sq ;ft) 'total Number of Units = 140 04/21/2005 11:02 7084300 LUCCA INC PAGE 03 to -?`I*} 11 t? y. l.. Ji : r IF 1 , ?i ai" ul! .. , jil iGR% 9 ?- jI ' El 4Q zd wezs:ee seep Z :r 1 aw iorld sts? 9ZZ aW_ )E31k , MiS i i Development services 1 2004 - 2005 . CfrY OF -CLEARWATER _ NNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVES MUNICIPALWRVICES BUILDING, 100 S. MYRTLE VtNUE RM 210 POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE OCL9003241 THIS LICENSE MUST BE POSTED CONSPICUOUSLY IN PLACE OF BUSINESS Owner Name & Mailina Address: US - EURO TRADE INC ALBATROSS MOTEL 346 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Category A(4,-?, ss Ou 081000 RENTAL UNITS 14 3 Y6 Business Name and Mailing Address ALBATROSS MOTEL 348 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER 727-442-6420 LICENSE YEAR PERIOD BEGINNING PERIOD ENDING PRINT DATE 2004 - 2005 October 1, 2004 September 30, 2005 May 02, 2005 FEE TYPE CHECK NO RECEIPT FEE LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL TRANSFER FEE OCL Upgrade Fee 1200400000000008228 1200500000000003807 1200500000000003807 39.95 3.90 1.60 TOTAL RECEIVED 45.45 Iss THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE DOES NOT PERMIT THE LICENSEE TO VIOLATE ANY ZONING LAWS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER NOR DOES IT EXEMPT THE LICENSEE FROM ANY OTHER LICENSE, PERMIT OR IMPOSED TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES. ANY CHANGE IN LOCATION, BUSINESS NAME, OR OWNERSHIP MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. DEVaDPMDff SERVICES EXRECrOR NON-REFUNDABLE CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE RM 210 ='+ POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33758-4748 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 Development Services 2004 - 2005 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE OCL-0018242 THIS LICENSE MUST BE POSTED CONSPICUOUSLY IN PLACE OF BUSINESS Owner Name & Mailing Address: LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 9011 S NATOMA AVE OAK LAWN, IL 60453 Business Name & Address: LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 345 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER, FL 708-430-0905 4 C_ 0" v ?. ?1_ 5 1 OS2. Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL UNITS 3 RENTAL UNITS (MONTHLY RENTAL LEASES) LICENSE YEAR PERIOD BEGINNING PERIOD ENDING PRINT DATE 2004 - 2005 October 1, 2004 September 30, 2005 April 29, 2005 FEE TYPE CHECK NO RECEIPT FEE LICENSE FEE - NEW cash 1200500000000003757 28.75 TOTAL RECEIVED 28.75 iss THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE DOES NOT PERMIT THE LICENSEE TO VIOLATE ANY ZONING LAWS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER NOR DOES IT EXEMPT THE LICENSEE FROM ANY OTHER LICENSE, PERMIT OR IMPOSED TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES. ANY CHANGE IN LOCATION, BUSINESS NAME, OR OWNERSHIP MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR NON-REFUNDABLE CL W OccUc N ew04-05. rpt t?+?iAmy? 44 y. Vr- '?. TTY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW June 23, 2005 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE: Community Board Meeting regarding application for Flexible Development approval (FL1 and TDR2005-03020). Dear Mr. Zayac: The Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist District (Parcels A and B) and an increase in height from 30 feet to 148 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel A), an increase in the height of a parapet wall from 30 inches (2.5 feet) to seven feet (Parcel B), permit a building within the required sight visibility triangles along Coronado Drive and 5th Street and an increase in height from 30 feet to 64 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel B) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [ 116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C (Parcels A, B and C), Preliminary Plat and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4- 1403. The meeting will take place on July 19, 2005 at 1:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4558. Sincerely, _ -- Mark T. Parry Consulting Planner S: (Planning Department) CD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next DRCIGulfview S 325 Lucca Developmentl Gulfview S325 CDB Letter.doc BRIAN J. AUNGSI', MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOPI' HAMILPON, COUNCII.MBMER BILL JONSON, COUNCIL.MENIBER CARLGN A. PETERSEN, COUNCIL ME\IBER "EQUAL EMPLOYNIFNT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACPION EMPLOYER" FAX MESSAGE CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S MYRTLE AVE. P O BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748 OFFICE PHONE - (727) 562-4567 FAX PHONE - (727) 562-4576 TO: Keith Zayc FAX #: (727) 793-9855 FROM: Mark T. Parry, Planning and Development Services, City of Clearwater DATE: Th.ursday,J une 1.6, 2005 MESSAGE: Re: Letter of Objection Keith, I've received the following letter of objection which has taken your application off the consent agenda. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting me directly at 727.562.4558. NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Two (2) 0 0 er!!t9 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT RFvTFw C I T Y F )__j E A R W A TE R. -PLANNt.NG DEPAR T MENT POST OFFICE Box 4743, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-474£ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 May 26, 2005 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE: Communit} rent Board Meeting regarding application for Flexible Development approval (FLD2005-02021 and TDR2005-03020). Dear Mr. Zayac: The Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist District (Parcels A and B) and an increase in height from 30 feet to 148 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel A), an increase in the height of a parapet wall from 30 inches (2.5 feet) to seven feet (Parcel B), permit a building within the required sight visibility triangles along Coronado Drive and 5th Street and an increase in height from 30 feet to 64 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel B) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [ 116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C (Parcels A, B and C), Preliminary Plat and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4- 1403. The meeting will take place on June 21, 2005 at 1:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3ra floor of City Hall at 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4558. Sincerely, ,e?_ --- ~- -- -?7 Mark T. Parry Consulting Planner S. IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next DRCIGulfview S325 Lucca DevelopmentlGulfview S325 CDB Letter. doc BRIAm J. ALINGST, MAYOR. FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOY"C HABIILTOiN, COL!N IL1dEAIBER MILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, 000NICILMENIMR "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRnvi-IVE Aurioi! EMPLOYER" ,.1 Clearwater ''1 11 OWN. City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave., 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: (727) 562-4567 Fax: (727) 562-4865 Fax Cover Sheet To: Keith Zayac Fax: 727-793-9855 Phone: 727-793-9888 From: Sherry Watkins Date: 05/2/2005 Subject: DRC Comment & Meeting Time 1:00PM Message: May 5, 2005 Your DRC meeting time is 1:OOPM FLD2005-02021-325S Gulfview Blvd Number of pages including cover sheet 1:00 pm Case Number: FLD2005-02021 -- 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD • . < Owner(s) Lucca Development, Llc 9011 S Natoma Ave Oak Lawn, 1160453 TELEPHONE: 708-785-0264, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: Atlas Page: UNK Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist District (Parcels A and B) and an increase in height from 30 feet to 148 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel A), permit a building within the required sight visibility triangles along Coronado Drive and 5th Street and an increase in height from 30 feet to 64 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel B) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., a Termination of the status of a nonconforming use (equivalent of 117 hotel units [ 113 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 94 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C (Parcels A, B and C), Termination of the status of a nonconforming use (20 hotel units where 18 hotel units are permitted) (401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) within the Tourist District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C. and a Transfer of Development Rights of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and Q. Proposed Use: Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, F133761 TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): 100 Devon Dr Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner III Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - Page 14 a r i r arrcra,#+, Conditions Associated With FLD2005-02021 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4576 04/25/2005 1. Beach Walk Coronado Drive improvements will impact this development. A 7-foot sidewalk will be constructed by others along the east property line of parcel "A", driveway aprons shall be moved back to outside of sidewalk. 2. Move driveway aprons to edge of 7 ft. sidewalk to be constructed by others along east side of Coronado Drive on Coronado frontage of parcel "B". 3. The north-south dimension of parcel B is incorrectly shown on Page 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 of 16. 4. Please be advised: Beach Walk South Gulfview Blvd. improvements to take place June 2007 - 2008 will replace sidewalk construction proposed on South Gulfview frontage. 5. Driveway to access solid waste pickup area on east side of building on Parcel "A" shall be posted "No Parking". 6. 8-in. storm pipe under Hamden Dr. shall be ductile iron pipe in accordance with City Contract Specifications. 7. Sanitary sewer connection on South Gulfview Blvd. may be to a new sewer line installation. Contact Steve Doherty (727) 562-4773. 8. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f. [sidewalks shall NOT to be constructed within this apron area(s)]. 9. Sanitary sewer cleanout detail # 304 on page 12 of 16 is out of date. Please use current detail. 10. Underground utilities in Coronado Drive are scheduled to be replaced as part of the Beach Walk project. New lines in Coronado include a 16" water transmission line, a 12" water transmission line and a 12" gravity sewer line. Sewer flows for Parcel "A" shall be directed to the new 12" gravity sewer in Coronado. Parcel "B" may direct sewer flows to either the new 12" gravity in Coronado or gravity line in Hamden Drive. Above conditions are to be addressed prior to C.D.B. Not Met General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Prior to building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit is required for all work done within city rights-of-way. Contact Don Melone at (727) 562-4798. 2. Applicant is advised to detemine whether or not existing reclaimed water connections can be utililized for Parcels "A", and "B". Environmental Condition 04/22/2005 No Issues Fire Condition Heather Faessler 562-4897 Not Met Not Met Not Met Not-Met CaseConditons Downes Blackburn 562-4327 xt 3025 04/26/2005 Ensure adequate water supply for fire sprinklers and for fire fighting purposes at all 3 properties included in this DRC Review. Please respond PRIOR TO CDB. 04/26/2005 Fire hydrants must be located within 300 ft of the most remote point of the building(s), as the hose is layed. Ensure adequate number of fire hydrants for each property included in this DRC Review. Please respond PRIOR TO CDB. 04/26/2005 Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please respond PRIOR TO CDB. Print Date: 05/02/2005 Page 1 of 7 FLD2005-02021 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Fire Condition Downes Blackburn 562-4327 xt 3025 04/26/2005 Provide a Standpipe water supply with 2 1/2 inch connection and 1 1/2 adaptor with breakable Not Met cover and chain within 100 feet of any peir/land intersection, as per NFPA-303. Please respond PRIOR TO CDB. 04/28/2005 Is this project condominiums or apartments? Is this project hotel? Please respond PRIOR TO Not Met CDB. Building Facade Landscape C Arden Dittmer 562-4604 04/27/2005 Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with Not Met frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Landscape Arden Dittmer 562-4604 04/27/2005 Plans appear to be showing the landscape on the eastern side of the building beneath the building.. revise the plan to show a building facade landscape and a tiered effect. You can add plants in the areas of the walls where there are none indicated, Leriope muscari is not a hedge. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 562-4741 04/22/2005 Recommend to follow your arborists advice to preserve and/or relocate all #3 rated or above palm trees. 04/22/2005 Revise the yop of bank at tree #11, 47 & 49 to allow additional room for tree preservation. Revise prior to CDB. 04/22/2005 Revise the Demolition Plan to reflect the preservation of tree #21, 22, 30, and 58. Insure that all civil plans coincide. Provide prior to CDB. 04/22/2005 Remove the "Type B Barrier", ribbon barricades are not permitted, also revise the "Type A Barrier" to reflect 2x2 post with 1x4 rails. Revise prior to CDB. 04/22/2005 Revise the "Tree Removal" calculations to reflect that palms are replaced at one inch per palm if they are greater than 10' of clear trunk. Revise prior to CDB. 04/22/2005 The arborists field notes should be transfered in "type" on the Tree Inventory Plan. Revise prior to building permit. 04/22/2005 Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, building lintels, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information the arborist feels relates to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Parks & Recs Condition Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Open Space and Recreation Impact Fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat Not Met (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Storm Water Condition Elliot Shoberg 562-4748 Print Date: 05/02/2005 CaseConditons Page 2 of 7 FLD2005-02021 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Storm Water Condition Elliot Shoberg 562-4748 04/22/2005 Prior to CDB: Not Met Parcel A 1) Narrative states that attenuation for 25 year 1 hour storm will be provided along with water quality treatment (not stacking). 2) Calculations show 7086 CF required, stage storage spreadsheet calls out 3,522 provided and volume column shows 5,377 cf available with 0.5' of free-board. 3) Please clarify. Parcel B 1) Narrative states that water quality treatment will be provided. 2) Calculations show 2535 CF required for water quality. 3) Stage storage curve provided for parcel A only. 4) Please clarify. Solid Waste Condition Please explain how solid waste will be handled Not Met is the driveway on S. Coranado dedicated to solid waste staging? How will recycling be handled. All Solid waste containers (compactors) need approval of Solid Waste Department Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 04/25/2005 1. Please show turning movements within the garages on the site plan for a scaled passenger Not Met vehicle. Turning vehicles shall not encroach into on opposing lanes. 2. Will the garage have a mechanical gate? If so, the face of gate must be 40' from back edge of sidewalk. 3. Where will delivery vehicles stage to drop off large items i.e. furniture, appliances etc.? 4. The vertical height of the garage must be 8'2" clear to accommodate H/C van. 5. Stacked parking spaces are counted as one parking stall not two. 6. Civil Site plan data table must match with the Architectural site plan's data table, specifically the existing number of units and the proposed number of units. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. ZONING CONDITION Initials Missing 562-4558 03/0312005 TDR completeness: Provide a copy of the zoning maps with sender and receiver site clearly Not Met highlighted and labeled. 03/03/2005 Provide or revise site data table to indicate "Gross floor area devoted to each use", per section Not Met 4-202.A. 03/03/2005 Provide "all proposed freestanding and attached signs: provide details includeing location, size, Not Met height, colors, materials, and drawing; freestanding sign shall include the street address." 03/03/2005 Provide or revise site data table to indicate "floor area ration (FAR) for all nonresidential uses, per Not Met section 4-202.A. This is for existing and proposed (if any); 03/03/2005 Clarify if all Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easements was Not Met submitted. Could not locate. 03/03/2005 Provide or revise site plan to indicate "Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures", per Section Not Met 4-202.A. Print Date: 05/02/2005 CaseConditons Page 3 of 7 • FLD2005-02021 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Initials Missing 562-4558 The surveys provided need additional labeling - the first sheet labeled as "sender 0.45 ac" is clear. Not Met The second sheet, Sheet 1 of 2, is labeled as "receiver 2.37 ac" I assume to be Parcel A. The third sheet, Sheet 2 of 2, is not labeled but I assume that to be Parcels B and C. Please clarify this as soon as possible; As a companion comment to number one above, the "Sender 0.45 ac" sheet lists Lots 1, 11 and Not Met 12 of Columbia Subdivision No. 4 in the legal. In addition, Lots 3, 4 9 and 10 are all labeled as "NOT INCLUDED". However, as part of you application a page entitled "TDR PROPERTY" consisting of a zoning map apparently taken from the City's website shows three properties, 401 Coronado Drive, 405 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive. These properties appear to include Lots 1 (401 Coronado Drive), 2 (405 Coronado Drive) and 11 and 12 (406 Hamden Drive). Lot 2 (405 Coronado Drive is clearly marked as "NOT INCLUDED" on the submitted survey. In addition, Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) application lists only two properties as sender sites, 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives. This needs to be clarified as soon as possible; The TDR application requires that all property owners be listed for both the sender and receiver Not Met sites. The property owner for the receiver site is listed as "See attached list for owners, addresses & parcels". There is a list providing numerous parcel numbers and names and addresses. I assume that this is the referenced list but it needs to be labeled. The application should probably read "See Attachment A" or something along those lines and the list itself should reflect that title for clarity; Sheets A, B should include "Sender Site" in the title block. Please note that the same comment Not Met above (#2) applies to this sheet as well; It would be helpful if all the sheets were oriented the same way - for example, Sheet 2 of 16 is Not Met oriented with north up and Sheet 3 of 16 is oriented with north right; Indicate the setback to the open arcade portico on the west and east faeades on Parcel A; Not Met The building on Parcel B appears to be 64 feet in height as measured from base elevation to the Not Met midpoint of the peak of the roof. Please confirm/clarify this as soon as possible; Indicate the number of parking spaces to be located on each parcel in addition to the total number Not Met of parking spaces. On that note, it appears that there will be a total of 99 dwelling units on Parcels A and B. The total number of parking spaces required should be 149 as 1.5 times 99 equals 148.5. In addition, provide the number of parking spaces for Parcel A and Parcel B; Indicate the number of existing and proposed units on each parcel (A and B); The Termination of Status as a Non-conformity for the donor site will require its own application and application fee of $1,205. In addition, we will need to ascertain the proposed use for the donor site (not to be confused with requiring a site plan at this time). If the use will include amenities for the receiver site it will need to be joined with the receiver site through unity of title otherwise the amenity use will be considered a social/community center with a floor area ratio and parking requirement of its own. With only two units left on the site it will be difficult to develop this site with a social/community center; The landscape plans should be labeled as parcels A or B; Clarify how Parcel C will be developed/redeveloped; That evidence of filing of a Unity of Title of Parcels A, B and C with Pinellas County be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; Print Date: 05/02/2005 Page 4 of 7 Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met CaseConditons FLD2005-02021 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Initials Missing 562-4558 That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies Not Met or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final Comprehensive Sign Program package (as required) submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any sign permits which includes that: a. All signs be designed as part of an overall theme that respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building; b. All signs consist of design, colors, materials, size, shape and methods of illumination which reinforce the overall design of the faeade; c. All attached signs are installed so the method of installation is concealed or made an integral part of the design of the sign; d. All wall signs be located on flat, unadorned parts of a faeade such as the horizontal band between the storefront and second floor or on windows, awning flaps, fascia, etc.; and e. The letter size, letter and word spacing, font style and other design elements of all signs create an overall high quality aesthetic appearance. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Not Met Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical Not Met and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from Not Met 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C), be recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; There does not seem to be a valid occupational license for a hotel at 401 Coronado Drive. A final Not Met notice to renew was issued by the City of Clearwater on December 10, 2004 with no action apparently being taken by property owner. This would indicate that the five units at this address are no longer "grandfathered in". Clarify the size of this site so that an accurate number of permitted units can be calculated; There is a valid occupation license issued for 406 Hamden Drive for 15 hotel units. Clarify the Not Met size of this site so that an accurate number of permitted units can be calculated; There appears to be a discrepancy between the application, which states that the request is for 93 Not Met attached dwellings and the site plans which indicate 99 dwelling units. This needs to be clarified as soon as possible; The PINs for parcel B are incorrect - they should start with 08 NOT 07; Not Met With regard to existing and permitted density: Not Met I have not been able to confirm that there are any existing dwelling units on any of the three parcels - A, B or C - through City records; It appears that the only unity of title that currently exists is between 346 Hamden Drive and half of Parcel C and 350 Hamden Drive and the other half of Parcel C and the three parcels comprising the Tropicana Motel property; Print Date: 05/02/2005 CaseConditons Page 5 of 7 FLD2005-02021 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Initials Missing 562-4558 It appears that the remaining parcels are currently separate pieces of property; Parcel A consists of 325 South Gulfview (1.239 acres with 64 hotel units existing and 49.56 permitted); 326 Coronado (0.177 acres with five hotel units existing and 7.080 permitted) Parcel B consists of 345 Coronado (0.150 acres, no business is listed as existing at this site and there are not dwelling or hotel units existing but 6.00 units permitted); 347 and 353 Coronado and 350 Hamden (0.487 acres with 32 hotel units existing and 19.480 permitted) and 346 Hamden (0.473 acres with 12 existing hotel units and 12.920 permitted). Per our meeting on 04/25/05 here's what I did: I figured the raw (unrounded) density for each parcel, as shown above, and then added them up before rounding down. The total permitted density for overnight accommodation units is 95.040 units or 95 units. All acreage was based upon City records (2.376 acres). There are some discrepancies between the acreages provided to me by Luke (2.331 acres) and what is listed by the Property Appraiser's records (2.339 acres). However, either way, the permitted density using any of the figures permits at least 18 overnight accommodation units to be transferred to the site (19 units using the City's figures and 18 using the County's or Luke's figures. Summary: a) There are 113 overnight accommodation units existing; b) There are no dwelling units existing; c) There are 95 overnight accommodation units permitted; d) Up to 19 overnight accommodation units may be transferred to the site (95 * .20); e) The site is 2.376 acres; f) The site is over dense by 18 overnight accommodation units; g) The applicant wants to transfer 18 overnight accommodation units to the site; h) The total desired number of overnight accommodation units for the site is 131 units; i) The conversion factor of overnight accommodation to dwelling units is 0.75; j) The number of permitted dwelling units (after termination of status of nonconformity with regard to density) is 98 units (1131 *0.75) k) This is one less than listed on the site plans; 1) That means that we were incorrect as we left it at that meeting on 04125/05 where we decided we didn't have to worry about proving the existence of the three dwelling units on 345 Coronado Drive. We didn't have to worry about proving it to transfer the 18 units from the donor site but we need to prove in order to keep those three (alleged) units on the site and add that to the 98 units mention in "j" above - totaling 101 dwelling units. Provide a materials and colour list for the building and site details (including lights, bollards, Not Met paving, etc.); The north arrow on the elevations should probably be removed as north is usually not possible to Not Met show on an elevation; Clarify how access into the building and parking will be controlled; Not Met Clarify the height of the building proposed for Parcel B - the height listed is 50 feet but the building Not Met includes a either a sloped roof or a flat roof with a modified parapet structure (which provides the appearance of a sloped roof). If this is a sloped roof provide the height to the mid-point of the peak of that roof. If it is a modified parapet structure, provide the height from the roof deck to the top of that structure; Clarify as to whether or not the area labelled as architectural pavers is under a building Not Met overhang/arcade or in the open. In other words, I need to have the extent of the building clarified; Print Date: 05/02/2005 CaseConditons Page 6 of 7 FLD2005-02021 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Initials Missing 562-4558 Clarify how the donor site - 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives - are working. Are they Not Met currently joined together through a unity of title?; The site data table says that the the data is for the total site consisting of Parcels A and B. What Not Met about C - I think that it is actually included - if it is then list it; Check your figure for open space which is listed as 0.69. 1 think that is probably the ISR; Not Met The dimensions listed for the property lines along Coronado and Hamden Drives for Parcel B Not Met appear to be incorrect - the site plan says 129 feet but the scale out to 185 feet - this needs to clarified and/or fixed; Print Date: 05/02/2005 CaseConditons Page 7 of 7 May. 02 2005 03:27PM YOUR LOGO City0fClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 May.02 03:22PM 05132 SND 09 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1--HELP-FAX C435-7329). TrIasm i ss i on Report Date/Time Local ID Local Name Company Logo This document was confirmed. (reduced sample and details below) Document Size Letter-S FAX MESSAGE CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BIDLDING PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S MYRTLE AVE. P O BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748 OFFICE PHONE - (727) 562.4567 PAX PHONE - (727) 5624576 TO: Keith 2avac FAX #: nn ?3 4est FROM: Mark T. PN3Plamvett and Develomment Services, City of Clearwater DATE: Thursday. Amil 07.2005 MESSAGE: Keith, The applieatton is complete but Fve identified a number of trouble spots that need to be smoothed over. I'll schedule you for the May 5,2005 DRC but there may be an additional DRC mquimd m please advise your client of that ]'ve also entailed and mailed this letter to you. Sbould you have any Veatioaa, please do not hesitate in contorting roe directly at 727.562.4558. NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Five (5) Total Pages Scanned : 5 Total Pages Confirmed 5 4- 7-05; 1:22PM 7275624796 No. Doc Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Mode Comments Results 1 243 97939855 4- 7-05; 1:16PM 4'43" 5/ 5 EC CP 9600 Notes . EC: Error Correct RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote BC: Broadcast Send MP: Multi-Poll PG: Polling a Remote CP: Completed RM: Receive to Memory DR: Document Removed HS: Host Scan HP: Host Print FO: Forced Output HF: Host Fax HR: Host Receive FM: Forward Mailbox Doc MB: Receive to Mailbox Pl: Power Interruption TM: Terminated by user WT: Waiting Transfer WS: Waiting Send s FAX MESSAGE CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S MYRTLE AVE. P O BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748 OFFICE PHONE - (727) 562-4567 FAX PHONE - (727) 562-4576 TO: Keith Zak FAX #: (727) 793-9855 FROM: Mark T. Parry, Planning and Development Services, City of Clearwater DATE: Thursday, April 07, 2005 MESSAGE: Keith, FILE The application is complete but I've identified a number of trouble spots that need to be smoothed over. I'll schedule you for the May 5,2005 DRC but there may be an additional DRC required so please advise your client of that. I've also emailed and mailed this letter to you. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting me directly at 727.562.4558. NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Five (5) 4TER? LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW [r]" CITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 April 7, 2005 L-1 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE: Flexible Development (FL - ) approval to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist District (Parcelr7V Witt 13)'"and an increase in height from 30 feet to 148 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel A), permit a building within the required sight visibility triangles along Coronado Drive and 51h Street and an increase in height from 30 feet to 64 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel B) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., a Termination of the status of a nonconforming use (equivalent of 117 hotel units [113 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 94 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C (Parcels A, B and C), Termination of the status of a nonconforming use (20 hotel units where 18 hotel units are permitted) (401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) within the Tourist District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C. and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. Dear Mr. Zayac: The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval as listed above for properties located at 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives and 325 South Gulfview Boulevard. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. BRIAN J. AUNGSf, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HoYf HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMENIBER ® CARLBN A. PETERSEN, COUNCII,MEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE AcnON EMPLOYER" • April 7, 2005 Zayac - Page Two • The following are items and/or data which need to be submitted and/or clarified at or prior to the Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting listed below (unless otherwise noted): 1. The surveys provided need additional labeling - the first sheet labeled as "sender 0.45 ac" is clear. The second sheet, Sheet 1 of 2, is labeled as "receiver 2.37 ac" I assume to be Parcel A. The third sheet, Sheet 2 of 2, is not labeled but I assume that to be Parcels B and C. Please clarify this as soon as possible; 2. As a companion comment to number one above, the "Sender 0.45 ac" sheet lists Lots 1, 11 and 12 of Columbia Subdivision No. 4 in the legal. In addition, Lots 3, 4 9 and 10 are all labeled as "NOT INCLUDED". However, as part of you application a page entitled "TDR PROPERTY" consisting of a zoning map apparently taken from the City's website shows three properties, 401 Coronado Drive, 405 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive. These properties appear to include Lots 1 (401 Coronado Drive), 2 (405 Coronado Drive) and 11 and 12 (406 Hamden Drive). Lot 2 (405 'Coronado Drive is clearly marked as "NOT INCLUDED" on the submitted'survey. '-Ifiladdition, Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) application lists only'two p-tMerties as sender sites, 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives. This needs to be clarified as soon as possible; 3. The TDR application requires that all property owners be listed for both the sender and receiver sites. The property owner for the receiver site is listed as "See attached list for owners, addresses & parcels". There is a list providing numerous parcel numbers and names and addresses. I assume that this is the referenced list but it needs to be labeled. The application should probably read "See Attachment A" or something along those lines and the list itself should reflect that title for clarity; 4. Sheets A, B should include "Sender Site" in the title block. Please note that the same comment above (#2) applies to this sheet as well; 5. It would be helpful if all the sheets were oriented the same way - for example, Sheet 2 of 16 is oriented with north up and Sheet 3 of 16 is oriented with north right; 6. Indicate the setback to the open arcade portico on the west and east fagades on Parcel A; 7. The building on Parcel B appears to be 64 feet in height as measured from base elevation to the midpoint of the peak of the roof. Please confirm/clarify this as soon as possible; 8. Indicate the number of parking spaces to be located on each parcel in addition to the total number of parking spaces. On that note, it appears that there will be a total of 99 dwelling units on Parcels A and B. The total number of parking spaces required should be 149 as 1.5 times 99 equals 148.5. In addition, provide the number of parking spaces for Parcel A and Parcel B; 9. Indicate the number of existing and proposed units on each parcel (A and B); 6 0 April 7, 2005 Zayac - Page Three 10. The Termination of Status as a Non-conformity for the donor site will require its own application and application fee of $1,205. In addition, we will need to ascertain the proposed use for the donor site (not to be confused with requiring a site plan at this time). If the use will include amenities for the receiver site it will need to be joined with the receiver site through unity of title otherwise the amenity use will be considered a social/community center with a floor area ratio and parking requirement of its own. With only two units left on the site it will be difficult to develop this site with a social/community center; 11. The landscape plans should be labeled as parcels A or B; 12. In an email from Joe Burdette dated March 29, 2005 it is stated that there are 113 hotel units and three dwelling units on Parcel A and one hotel unit on Parcel B. However, the number of hotel and dwelling units listed on all site plans and in the submitted written narrative it appears that there are a total of 113 hotel and three dwelling units on Parcels A, B and C (totaling 2.37 acres). This needs to be clarified. I have run my own numbers (keeping in mind that we have all gone over these numbers several times already but the acreage appears to have changed somewhat) and have come up with the following: a. 2.37 acres (total of Parcels A, B and C) will yield 94 hotel units or 71 dwelling units; b. 20 percent of these two numbers yields 18 hotel units or 14 units; c. The donor site, 0.445 acres as listed in the application, is listed in the email as 0.6 acres. Assuming the correct acreage is 0.445 acres then that site will yield 18 hotel units or 13 dwelling units; d. Provided that documentation is provided which indicates that all 113 hotel units and three dwelling units are legally permitted (not to be confused with conforming) we can assume that the Termination of Status as a Non- conformity will be to permit the equivalent of 117 hotel units on Parcels A, B and C. e. With the TDR of 18 hotel units from the donor site there will be a total of 135 hotel units on the Parcels A, B and C. Using a conversion of 0.75 from hotel to dwelling units, the total number of dwelling units will be 101 units which may be used between parcels A, B and C subsequent to a final Unity of Title joining these three parcels together into property. We need to clarify, or at least we need to confirm that this is the correct number based on correct acreage, how the number went from 99 units to 101; 13. Clarify how Parcel C will be developed/redeveloped; 14. There does not seem to be a valid occupational license for a hotel at 401 Coronado Drive. A final notice to renew was issued by the City of Clearwater on December 10, 2004 with no action apparently being taken by property owner. This would indicate that the five units at this address are no longer "grandfathered in". Clarify the size of this site so that an accurate number of permitted units can be calculated; 0 0 April 7, 2005 Zayac - Page Four 15. There is a valid occupation license issued for 406 Hamden Drive for 15 hotel units. Clarify the size of this site so that an accurate number of permitted units can be calculated; and 16. There appears to be a discrepancy between the application, which states that the request is for 93 attached dwellings and the site plans which indicate 99 dwelling units. This needs to be clarified ass soon as possible. The DRC will review the application for sufficiency on May 5, 2005 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Watkins, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your client must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Please note that this letter addresses completeness items only. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: http://www.myclearwater.com/. Sincerely, Mark T. Parry Consulting Planner S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next DRCIGulfview S 325 Lucca DevelopmentlGu?&iew S 325 complete Letter I doc 41 *CITY OF CLEORWATER o_ e.at?r PLANNING DEPARTMENT - '' ` MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W .MYCLEARWATER. COM March 03, 2005 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 RE: FLD2005-02021 -- 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-02021. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide or revise site plan to show "Footprint and size of all existing buildgs and structures". per Section 4-202.A. 2. Provide or revise site plan to indicate "Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures", per Section 4-202.A. 3. Provide or revise site data table to indicate "Gross floor area devoted to each use", per section 4-202.A. 4. Clarify if all Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easements was submitted. Could not locate. 5. Provide or revise site data table to indicate "florr area ration (FAR) for all nonresidential uses, per section 4-202.A. 6. Revise site plan to indicate all lot lines and building lines (dimensioned). 7. Revise site plan to indicate all streets and drives (dimensioned). 8. Revise site plan to indicate all structural overhands (dimensioned). 9. Provide "all existing freestanding and attached signs: provide photographs and dimesnions (area, height, etc), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain." 10. Provide "all proposed freestanding and attached signs: provide details includeing location, size, height, colors, materials, and drawing; freestanding sign shall include the street address." 11. TDR completeness: Provide a copy of the zoning maps with sender and receiver site clearly highlighted and labeled. 12. TDR completeness: Provide sealed survey for both the sender and receiver sites with the square footage or acreage of each site. (There were several surveys submitted, however, they are all labelled LUCCA project. Redlining the addressess on the surveys would assist staff in performing reviews). 13. TDR completeness: Provide required information on the second "Site from" sheet As submitted it only includes only a signature of the property owner or representative. 14. TDR completeness: Provide statement that the development rights have not been previously used or exercised by another person. 15. TDR completeness: Provide statement that the development rights reflected in the instrument of conveyance have not been conveyed to another person. Letter oflncompleteness - FLD2005-02021 - 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD LL-` *CITY OF CLEORWATER 0 ` earwater March 03, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT. - ?--'' '- ? MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MY C LEAR W ATER. C OM 16. TDR completeness: Provide statement that the deed of transfer will be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Monday, March 7, 2005 (12:00 noon) If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner I Letter oflncompleteness - FLD2005-02021 - 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Mar. 03 2005 02:27PM YOUR LOGO : CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. : 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 Mar.03 02:25PM 01'35 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' ##04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, FL-EASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX 0435-7329). conditions Associated Witip FLD2005-02021 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Con11 John Schodtler 562-4604 03/03/2005 Provide or revise site plan to show "Footprint and size of all existing buildgs and structures". per Not Met Section 4-202.A. 03/03/2005 Provide or revise site plan to indicate "Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures", per Section Not Met 4-202.A. 03/03/2005 Provide or revise site data table to indicate "Gross floor area devoted to each. use", per section Not Met 4-202.A. 03/03/2005 Clarify if all Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easements was Not Met submitted. Could not locate. 03/03/2005 Provide or revise site data table to indicate "florr area ration (FAR) for all nonresidential uses, per Not Met section 4-202.A. 03/03/2005 Revise site plan to indicate all lot lines and building lines (dimensioned). Not Met 03/03/2005 Revise site plan to indicate all streets and drives (dimensioned). Not Met 03/03/2005 Revise site plan to indicate all structural overhands (dimensioned). Not Met 03/03/2005 Provide "all existing freestanding and attached signs: provide photographs and dimesnions (area, Not Met height, etc), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain." 03/03/2005 Provide "all proposed freestanding and attached signs: provide details includeing location, size, Not Met . height, colors, materials, and drawing; freestanding sign shall include the street address." 03/03/2005 Please resubmit all required items for completeness prior to Monday, March 7, 2005 (00`pm)? *00 fyS 6 Not Met 03/03/2005 TDR completeness: Provide a copy of the zoning maps with sender and receiver site clearly Not Met highlighted and labeled. 03/03/2005 TDR completeness: Provide sealed survey for both the sender and receiver sites with the square Not Met footage or acreage of each site. (There were several surveys submitted, however, they are all labelled LUCCA project. Redlining the addressess on the surveys would assist staff in performing reviews). 03/03/2005 TDR completeness: Provide required information on the second "Site from" sheet As submitted it Not Met only includes only a signature of the property owner or representative. 03/03/2005 TDR completeness: Provide statement that the development rights have not been previously Not Met used or exercised by another person. 03/03/2005 TDR completeness: Provide statement that the development rights reflected in the instrument of Not Met conveyance have not been conveyed to another person. 03/03/2005 TDR completeness: Provide statement that the deed of transfer will be recorded prior to .the Not Met issuance of a building permit. Print Date: 03/03/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 9 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:00 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Doherty, Steve Subject: Marbella Minor Revision Wayne, Following are comments resulting from review of resubmittal on subject project by Ben and I: #17 - Two problems exist with the handicap parking. A door opens into the accessible aisle for parking space 135 and a wall partially obstructs the exit from the accessible aisle from parking space 136. Suggestions to improve these situations include 1) relocating the aisle for parking space 136 to the east side of that space and extending it to intersect with the aisle for space 138 and 2) relocating parking space 135 to the location currently occupied by space 122 and marking an accessible aisle for this space that would extend across the drive aisle and connect with space 136. #18 - Met #19 - Met #20 - Met #21 - See comment #17. This comment was in reference to the parking space previously identified as number 139 that is now identified as 136. #22 - Met #23 - Mirrors and signs could not be located for parking spaces 105, 112, 138 (formerly 141), 139 (formerly 142), 142 (formerly 145) and 143 (formerly 146) and the mirror placements for the remaining spaces identified in the previous comment do not appear to provide adequate visibility. Please place a note on Sheet A2.01 as follows "Mirror placement for the parking spaces 105, ... shall be coordinated with the City of Clearwater traffic Operations Division prior to CO.". #24 - Met #29 - Met #32 - Met #33 - Similar comment as #23. Place same note as described in #23 on Sheet A2.02 with the appropriate parking space numbers identified. #34 - Met #41 - Similar comment as 423. Place same note as described in #23 on Sheet A2.03with the appropriate parking space numbers identified. #42 - Met Thanks, D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 Wells, Wayne From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 1:24 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Marbella Condos Wayne: Any clues as to what Scott is talking about?? Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.teff (@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:54 PM To: Tefft, Robert Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: Marbella Condos Robert, Joe Burdette sent me a copy of plans for the Marbella Condos. I understand he has submitted this hoping that it will be a minor revision. Ben and I have reviewed the revised plans and have the following comments: Traffic 1) Handicap aisle for parking space #139 will require a 44-inch clear width between the corner of the wall and the edge of handicap aisle. 2) Columns that are at an angle shall not encroach into parking spaces or drive aisles, each parking space shall measure 9-feet wide by 18-feet long and each bi-directional drive aisle shall be 24-feet wide without encroachment from any objects/structures. See columns at G-5, H-5, H-7, N-5, N-7 and P-5. 3) How does ramp between levels 2 and 3 function? 4) For parking levels 2 and 3, consider creating a one-way clockwise flow for better circulation and to minimize conflict points for motorists. 5) For parking level 1 install stop bar with the word stop on the pavement for the minor movements at the 4-way access intersection. In other words keep the driveway and ramp moving while the other two legs of the intersection stops. 6) Redesign or install safety devices where motorists are backing out of parking spaces blindly. See parking spaces numbered: 104,105,112,141, 142, 145, 146, 164, 201, 209, 258, 266, 301, 309 and 358. Thanks, Scott 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 5:58 PM To: 'Phil Stock' Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Marrabella parcel Email to & from 7. Email from 1. Burdette re... Burdette re Mino... Phil - This is a residential project. There has been discussions with Michael Delk regarding relocating the 10 units from Parcel B to Parcel A so that Parcel A will have a total of 102 dwelling units. He has indicated preliminary approval of such, but this change needs to be submitted as a Minor Revision, including revised site plans, floor plans and building elevations for this change in dwelling unit location. This has not yet been submitted. I am attaching two prior emails that speak to this change for your information. As to Parcel C - All development rights have been transferred off Parcel C to Parcels A and B, therefore no floor area or units (dwelling units or overnight accommodation units) can be placed on Parcel C in the future. Parking (surface or garage), retention and like improvements may be considered for Parcel C, but may require additional CDB approval for such (since the original approval was for nothing on Parcel C). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Phil Stock [mailto:PStock@irr.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 9:36 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marrabella parcel Hello, Parcel A is appears to be approved for 92 dwelling units and Parcel B is approved for 10 dwelling units. Are there residential or overnight accommodation units? Parcel C is approved for no units. Parking, drainage, etc? Thanks for the help. Phil What can you do with this parcel? -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:04 PM To: Phil Stock Subject: RE: Marrabella parcel Phil - The original approval was for a two year time frame to submit for a building permit. When the error in the Development Order was brought to our attention, we amended the Development Order (see attached). The expiration date for this project is July 19, 2007. This should help you. 1 Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Phil Stock [mailto:PStock@irr.com] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 3:46 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marrabella parcel Hey Wayne, I am doing an appraisal on the above reference property. The Development Order I have expired on July 19, 2006 and need written approve from the Community Development Coordinator for a one year extension. I am assuming from your prior response that the extension was granted? Thanks for your help. Phil Stock 813-287-1000 ext. 155 From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 9:05 AM To: 'bhoolihan@Arcap.com' Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: Marrabella parcel Mr. Hoolihan - Case No. FLD2005-02021 was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on July 19, 2005, for the above referenced project. A total of 102 attached dwelling units was approved, with 92 attached dwelling units to be located on "Parcel All (property located between S. Gulfview and Coronado Drive), 10 attached dwelling units to be located on "Parcel B" (property located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive) and no dwelling units to be located on "Parcel C" (property located between Hamden Drive and Clearwater Harbor). The approved overall density for this project is 43.04 dwelling units per acre, which was based on the Termination of Status of Nonconformity and conversion of overnight accommodation units to dwelling units and a Transfer of Development Rights. A building permit to construct the project must be submitted by July 19, 2007, unless a time extension is granted. Wayne wells Planner III -----Original Message----- From: Bill Hoolihan [mailto:bhoolihan@Arcap.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 10:57 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marbella parcel How can I confirm the current and/or potential dwelling unit density for the above proposed project located in the Beach by Design project? Bill Hoolihan Hoolihan Realty Group Phone: 305.663.6525 From: Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com [mailto:Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 7:30 AM To: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com Cc: Bill Hoolihan Subject: FW: Marbella parcel Wayne can you assist Mr. Hoolihan? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Hoolihan [mailto:bhoolihan@Arcap.com] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 3:31 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Marbella parcel is How can I confirm the current and/or potential dwelling unit density for the above proposed project located in the Beach by Design project? Bill Hoolihan Hoolihan Realty Group Phone: 305.663.6525 3 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:00 PM To: Quillen, Michael Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Marabella condos, 325 S. Gulfview Mike - A Flexible Development application was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on July 19, 2005 (Case Nos. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005-03020). A condition of approval by the CDB was to allow the application for building permits within two years of CDB approval (normal Code is one year from CDB approval). I am not aware of any movement to submit for building permits to demolish and construct the new improvements (no such permits found in Permit Plan). No guess as to when such may come in. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Quillen, Michael Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 9:37 AM To: Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne Subject: Marabella condos, 325 S. Gulfview Can you please verify the status of this project. If I remember right they have a Development Order, but have not submitted for building permit. Any thoughts on the likelihood of them proceeding would be appreciated. Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Bill Hoolihan [bhoolihan@Arcap.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 11:08 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Marrabella parcel Thank you very much, I'm sure I'll have a few questions. Bill Hoolihan From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 10:06 AM To: Bill Hoolihan Cc: Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com Subject: Marrabella parcel Mr. Hoolihan - Yesterday I sent you the following response. Since you sent the same email request as you did on September 1 st, I am unclear if you received my September 5th email or if there were follow-up questions. Please note that the phone number listed at the bottom of this email string is a fax number. Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 9:05 AM To: 'bhoolihan@Arcap.com' Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: Marrabella parcel Mr. Hoolihan - Case No. FLD2005-02021 was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on July 19, 2005, for the above referenced project. A total of 102 attached dwelling units was approved, with 92 attached dwelling units to be located on "Parcel A" (property located between S. Gulfview and Coronado Drive), 10 attached dwelling units to be located on "Parcel B" (property located between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive) and no dwelling units to be located on "Parcel C" (property located between Hamden Drive and Clearwater Harbor). The approved overall density for this project is 43.04 dwelling units per acre, which was based on the Termination of Status of Nonconformity and conversion of overnight accommodation units to dwelling units and a Transfer of Development Rights. A building permit to construct the project must be submitted by July 19, 2007, unless a time extension is granted. Wayne Wells Planner III -----Original Message----- From: Bill Hoolihan [mailto:bhoolihan@Arcap.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 10:57 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Mar'bella parcel How can I confirm the current and/or potential dwelling unit density for the above proposed project located in the Beach by Design project? 9/6/2006 0 0 Page 2 of 2 Bill Hoolihan Hoolihan Realty Group Phone: 305.663.6525 From: Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com [mailto:Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 7:30 AM To: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com Cc: Bill Hoolihan Subject: FW: Marbella parcel Wayne can you assist Mr. Hoolihan? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Hoolihan [mailto:bhoolihan@Arcap.com] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 3:31 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Marbella parcel How can I confirm the current and/or potential dwelling unit density for the above proposed project located in the Beach by Design project? Bill Hoolihan Hoolihan Realty Group Phone: 305.663.6525 9/6/2006 CDB Date: Case Numbers Agenda Item: Owners of Receiver Site: Owners of Sender Site: Applicant: Address: 0 0 July 19, 2005 TDR2005-03020 FLD2005-02021 PLT2005-00010 D-2 Americana Gulf Motels, Ltd.; Lucca Development, LLC.; Thomasz and Stella Wilk; US - Eurotrade, Inc. Fifth South, LLC (401 Coronado Drive); Bay Lawn (406 Hamden Drive) Lucca Development, LLC. 325 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist District (Parcels A and B) and an increase in height from 30 feet to 148 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel A), an increase in the height of a parapet wall from 30 inches (2.5 feet) to seven feet (Parcel B), permit a building within the required sight visibility triangles along Coronado Drive and 5th Street and an increase in height from 30 feet to 64 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel B) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C (Parcels A, B and C), Preliminary Plat and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005- 03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. EXISTING ZONING/ LAND USE: Tourist (T) District/ Resort Facilities High (RFH) Classification BEACH BY DESIGN Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 1 of 12 0 • CHARACTER DISTRICTS: Small Motel and Beach Walk Districts PROPERTY USES: Current Use: Overnight accommodations and attached dwellings Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (102 units. Note: Some of the submitted documents and the site plan data table reference a total of 101 proposed dwelling units. This, however, is a scrivener's error and the applicant intends to locate 102 dwelling units on the site. Of that amount, 92 units will be located within the building on Parcel A and 10 units within the building on Parcel B) ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USE: North: Tourist District - Overnight accommodations, retail, and restaurant South: Tourist District - Overnight accommodations, retail, restaurant East: Tourist District - Overnight accommodations, retail, restaurant West: Tourist District - Overnight accommodations, retail, restaurant CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: A variety of retail, overnight accommodation and restaurant uses dominate the immediate vicinity. UPDATE: The application was reviewed at the June 21, 2005 CDB meeting. At the time the application was reviewed there were five CDB members present. Member Plisko recused himself due to a conflict of interest resulting is four voting members where a minimum of five are required for a quorum. The applicant did not resubmit any new data for this meeting and the application. The supporting materials, Staff report and recommendation have not changed. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The site is 2.37 acres generally bound by Hamden Drive to the east, South Gulfview Boulevard to the west and Fifth Street to the south. The subject site, consists of three parcels: Parcel A located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive), Parcel B (located between Coronado and Hamden Drives) and Parcel C located between Clearwater Harbor and Hamden Drive. All three parcels will be joined together through a unity of title prior to the issuance any building permits. Parcel A is located on the east side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 300 feet south of Third Street and 170 feet north of Fifth Street, consists of two properties (Howard Johnson Express Inn and the Americana Gulf Motel) and includes 1.41 acres. Parcel A has been developed with three buildings between one- and five- stories in height. There are a total of 69 overnight accommodation units on Parcel A. The site is currently accessed via two driveways along Coronado Drive with one each at the north and south sides of the site. A single- egress-only driveway is located centrally along the west side of Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 2 of 12 • • the site along South Gulfview Boulevard. The existing buildings, driveways and parking spaces will be demolished with this proposal. The two properties comprising Parcel A will be joined together through a unity of title with this proposal. Parcel B is 0.93 acres, consists of three properties and is bound by Coronado and Hamden Drives to the west and east, respectively and Fifth Street to the south. Property located at 341 and 343 Coronado Drive and 342 Hamden Drive border the north side of Parcel B and are not part of this proposal. Parcel B has been developed with four, one-story and two, two-story buildings with a total of 46 overnight accommodation units and three dwelling units. Access to Parcel B is characterized by several undefined driveways along Coronado and Hamden Drives which provide direct access to parking spaces which back out directly into those abutting public rights-of-way. The existing buildings, driveways and parking spaces will be demolished with this proposal. The three properties comprising Parcel B will be joined together through a unity of title with this proposal. Parcel C, associated and currently joined together with two properties included with Parcel B, is 0.03 acres and has been development with two docks (four slips). Approximately half of the parcel is joined with 346 Hamden Drive (currently the Albatross Motel) and the other half is joined with 350 Hamden Drive (currently the Tropicana Motel). The two existing docks will remain with this proposal and will serve as an accessory use for the remainder of the development consisting of Parcels A and B. Parcels A, B and C in their entireties will be joined together through a unity of title with this proposal. Although Parcels A and B and B and C are each separated by public rights-of-way (Coronado and Hamden Drives, respectively), Section 4-1601.C allows for lots to be joined together through a unity of title provided no more than 100 feet of public right-of-way separates them. Density Calculations: The Resort Facilities High (RFH) FLUP category permits up to 40 overnight accommodation units or 30 dwelling units per acre. Parcels a, B and C are all within the RFH FLUP category. There is a 75 percent conversion rate between overnight accommodation and dwelling units. Parcel A, at 1.41 acres in area, is permitted 56 overnight accommodation units (42 dwelling units) (1.41 by 40). The site currently has 13 overnight accommodation units in excess of the maxim otherwise permitted by the FLUP. Parcel B (0.93 acres), as outlined, includes 46 overnight accommodation units and three dwelling units (the equivalent of four overnight accommodation units) or 50 overnight accommodation units. Parcel B is permitted up 37 overnight accommodation units (0.93 by 40). The site also has 13 overnight accommodation units in excess of the maximum otherwise permitted by the FLUP. In determining maximum permitted density, the City of Clearwater rounds down to the nearest whole dwelling unit. In other words, should the raw density for a site yield 9.9999999 dwelling units, the City will round down that figure resulting in a permitted density of nine dwelling units Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 3 of 12 NOT 10. The total permitted density of Parcels A, B and C is 93 overnight accommodation units where 119 units exist. This results in a total excess of 26 overnight accommodation units. A termination of status of nonconformity to permit the existing density on Parcels A, B and C to remain on the site is part of this proposal. Proposal: The proposal includes a Transfer of Development Rights (18 overnight accommodation units), the construction of 102 dwelling units within two structures with one structure 148 feet in height and the other 64 feet in height and permitting a building to be located within required sight visibility triangles. The proposal also includes a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for existing, excess density (26 overnight accommodation units). These requests are examined individually in greater detail below. Transfer of Development Rights: This proposal includes the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) of 18 overnight accommodation units to this site (Parcels A, B and C) from 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives. The maximum number of permitted units for 406 Hamden Drive is 12 units (the site currently has an occupational license for 15 overnight accommodation units). The maximum number of permitted units for 401 Coronado Drive is six overnight accommodation units. The total, maximum number of permitted overnight accommodation units permitted on the donor site (401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives) is 18 units. The maximum number of units permitted to be transferred from 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives may not exceed the otherwise maximum permitted by the Resort Facilities High (RFH) FLUP category (18 overnight accommodation units). Therefore, should the termination of status of nonconformity be approved for this site three overnight accommodation units will remain on the site without the possibility of being used elsewhere. Should those units be removed prior to an approval as part of a termination of the status of a nonconforming use (15 hotel units where 12 hotel units are permitted) the units will not be permitted to be re-established on the site. The Code, under the provisions of Section 4-1403.E.3, and Beach by Design allows the use of TDRs provided both the sender and receiving sites are located within the Beach by Design redevelopment area. In addition, the maximum number of units which may be transferred to a receiver site may not exceed 20 percent of the permitted development potential of the site prior to the transfer (Section 4-1402.4). The maximum development potential for Parcels A, B and C is 93 overnight accommodation units. Therefore, 20 percent of the maximum number of permitted overnight accommodation units (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) is 18 units. The proposal is in compliance with the Plan policy regarding TDRs and the standards and criteria set forth in Community Development Code Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. A site plan for this site, the donor parcel, has not yet been submitted to the City for review. Parcel A• The proposal includes 92 attached dwellings within a single building 148 feet in height (as measured from base flood elevation) centrally located on the site. The building will be located approximately 17 feet from the front (west) property line along South Gulfview Boulevard, 15 feet from the side (north, south and west) property lines and 15 feet from the front (east) property line along Coronado Drive. Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 4 of 12 A total of 137 parking spaces will be provided under the building at grade and on the second floor where the Code requires 1.5 parking spaces (138 spaces) per dwelling unit be provided. Parcel B, examined in greater detail below, provides and additional 102 parking spaces where 10 are required for that portion of the site. A total of 239 parking spaces are provide (2.34 spaces per unit) where 153 spaces (1.5 space per unit) are required. A single, two-way driveway located along Coronado Drive will serve the site. The proposal includes the installation of landscaping around the perimeter of the site consistent with the intent of Beachwalk and the Code including India hawthorn, sea grape, viburnum, crepe myrtle, oleander and sabal palms. The main entrance to the high-rise building will be along South Gulfview Boulevard and incorporates arched elements, canopies, balconies and an extensive use of windows as part of a Mediterranean-Influenced architectural style. The proposed materials will be painted stucco with natural colors and a terra cotta tile roof. The increase in height above 35 feet is consistent with the Beach Walk District of Beach by Design which calls for creating a "world class" address for revitalized properties. The design of the building is consistent with the Design Guidelines section of Beach by Design. The building presents a finished primary facade towards the South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive rights-of-way. The proposed materials will be stucco, limestone balustrades, wrought iron railings and a terra cotta barrel tile roof. Architectural details include green, fabric awnings, raised window trim and coping differentiating the third, fifth, tenth and fourteenth floors. While the main roof extends to 148 feet in height, architectural embellishments, an additional 16 feet in height, conceal elevator shafts and provide additional visual interest. The area is characterized by several existing or approved, but as of yet un-built, taller buildings including the existing Adam's Mark Hotel (155 feet) and the proposed Hyatt Hotel (150 feet). The remainder of the buildings in the area constitutes a great range of height from 15 to 60 feet. An extensive use of stepbacks and articulation of the fenestration minimize the height and bulk of the building. The building is further articulated through the use of recesses and projections to vary its width, building stories are differentiated by architectural features including cornice lines and balconies. Stepbacks are provided along all facades beginning at the third floor through the top floor including a stepback of 24 feet at the 1 lth floor (approximately 110 feet) on the north, south and west side and a stepback of 32 feet at the 14th floor (approximately 140 feet) on the west side. This results in extensive negative and positive space on all sides of the building adding to the visual aesthetics. All facades of the building utilizes the same high level of detail and architectural embellishments as the formal front (west facade) of the building facing South Gulfview Boulevard. The building provides for a floor plate less then 25,000 square feet for all floors between 42 and 100 feet and averages less than 10,000 square feet per floor above 100 feet. The building meets all requirements of Beach by Design and its Design Guidelines. Solid waste services will be provided via one solid waste staging area at the southeast corner of the site. All stormwater requirements have been met with this proposal with the site. No signage is proposed with this application however should a sign package be submitted it would need to meet all Code requirements. Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 5 of 12 0 • Parcel A has been developed with two overnight accommodation establishments (Howard Johnson Express Inn and the Americana Motel) on two properties with a total of 69 overnight accommodation units. Under the Resort Facilities High (RFH) FLUP category 56 overnight accommodation units are permitted on this site. The site currently has 13 overnight accommodation units in excess of the maxim otherwise permitted by the FLUP. A termination of status of nonconformity to permit the existing density to remain on the site is part of this proposal. The proposal is in compliance with the Community Development Code standards and criteria set forth in Section 6-109.C for a termination of status as a nonconformity. Parcels B and C• The proposal includes 10 attached dwellings within a building 50 feet in height. The building will occupy almost the entire site and will be located between 15 and 16 feet from any property line. A total of 102 parking spaces will be provided under the building at grade and on the second floor where the Code requires 1.5 parking spaces. As outlined above in the analysis for Parcel A, a total of 237 parking spaces will be provided for the entire development where 153 spaces are required. Two, two-way driveways, with one centrally located along Coronado Drive and a second on the east side of the site along 5th Street, will serve the site. The proposal includes the installation of landscaping around the perimeter of the site consistent with the intent of Beachwalk and the Code including India hawthorn, sea grape, viburnum, crepe myrtle, oleander and sabal palms. The main entrance to the high-rise building will be along South Gulfview Boulevard and incorporates arched elements, canopies, balconies and an extensive use of windows as part of a Mediterranean-Influenced architectural style. The proposed materials will be painted stucco with natural colors and a terra cotta tile roof. The increase in height above 35 feet is consistent with the Small Motel District of Beach by Design. The design of the building, which will complement the building located to the west on Parcel A, is also consistent with Beach by Design. The building presents a finished primary facade towards the South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive rights-of-way. The proposed materials will be stucco, limestone balustrades, wrought iron railings and a terra cotta barrel tile roof. Architectural details include green, fabric awnings, raised window trim and coping differentiating the third and fifth floors. The building is articulated through the use of recesses and projections to vary its width, building stories are differentiated by architectural features including cornice lines, balconies and coping and stepbacks are provided at the upper floors on all facades. The increase in height above 35 feet to 50 feet is consistent with the Small Motel District of Beach by Design and will serve as an adequate transition area between the Brightwater Drive area of the Small Motel District, which, in that specific location, limits the height of development to two- to four-stories above parking, and the Beach Walk District, which allows for more intense development. While the main roof extends to 50 feet in height a parapet roof structure extends up to an additional seven feet above the roof deck where an additional 2.5 is otherwise permitted. Additional architectural embellishments, concealing Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 6 of 12 • • mechanical equipment and an elevator shaft, extends 16 feet above the roof deck, is permitted by Code and provides additional visual interest. Consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design, the building incorporates articulation of the fenestration along the front (east and west) and side (north and south) facades. The front (east and west0 facades provide significant stepbacks of a minimum of 36 feet at the first floor. The side (north facades) provides smaller setbacks of approximately four feet at the first floor. In addition, the east facade of the building utilizes the same level of detail and architectural embellishments as the front (west facade) of the building facing Coronado Drive. Solid waste services will be provided via a fully enclosed trash staging area at the northeast corner of the building staff of the condominium will bring the containers out on pick-up days and return them to the staging area after servicing. All stormwater requirements have been met with this proposal with the site. No signage is proposed with this application however should a sign package be submitted it would need to meet all Code requirements. The two docks located on Parcel C will be maintained with this proposal and will serve the dwelling units on Parcels A and B. Parcel B has been developed with two overnight accommodation establishments (the Tropicana and Albatross Motels) with a total of 46 overnight accommodation units and three dwelling units (equivalent of four overnight accommodation units) where the Resort Facilities High (RFH) FLUP category permits up to 37 units on this size site. The site currently has 13 overnight accommodation units in excess of the maximum otherwise permitted by the FLUP. A termination of status of nonconformity to permit the existing density to remain on the site is part of this proposal. The proposal is in compliance with the Community Development Code standards and criteria set forth in Section 6-109.C for a termination of status as a nonconformity. Code Enforcement Analysis: Outstanding Code enforcement issues associated with this site include non-compliant signage, general overgrowth of plant material and weeds, storage of inoperative vehicles, poorly maintained building, grass parking, parking areas in poor repair and outdoor storage. These issues will be eliminated with the redevelopment of this site. CYIMPT.TANf F WTTTT CTANDARiIC AND CRTTF.RTA- (f nrde Certinne 7-R(YI nnrd %R(121- Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent DENSITY (40 OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATION UNITS/AC OR 30DU/AC; 93 OVERNIGHT 43.04 du/ac; 102 du X ACCOMMODAITON UNITS OR 69 DU) IMPERVIOUS SURACE 0.70 X RATIO (ISR) 0.95 LOT AREA (10,000 sq.ft.) 103,155.11 square feet (2.37 acres) X Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 7 of 12 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent LOT WIDTH (100 feet) Parcel A: 240 feet X Parcel B: 185 feet HEIGHT (35 - 50 FEET) Parcel A: 148 feet X Parcel B: 64 feet PARKING SPACES (1.5 SPACE PER DU; 153 2.34 spaces per du; 239 spaces X SPACES) * See staff analysis above. COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS STANDARDS Section 4-1403): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting property. X 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City X of Clearwater. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with X adjacent land uses. 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for X development. 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate X vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. COMPLIANCE WITH TERMINATION OF STATUS AS A NONCONFORMITY STANDARDS (Section 6-109): Consistent Inconsistent 1 • Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3- X 1202(D) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping X standards established in Section 3-1202(E). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, X removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign X programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 8 of 12 • COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. X 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value X thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation X impacts on adjacent properties. COMPLIANCE. WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Code Section 2-RO3_C.)! Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the X fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project X are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the X immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the X community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-Avenue parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for X development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 9 of 12 0 0 Consistent Inconsistent 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be X available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District X design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on May 5, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist District (Parcels A and B) and an increase in height from 30 feet to 148 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel A), an increase in the height of a parapet wall from 30 inches (2.5 feet) to seven feet (Parcel B), permit a building within the required sight visibility triangles along Coronado Drive and 5th Street and an increase in height from 30 feet to 64 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel B) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C (Parcels A, B and C), Preliminary Plat and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4- 1402 and 4-1403 for the site at 325 South Gulfview Boulevard, based on the following recommended findings of fact, recommended conclusions of law and with conditions: Recommended Findings of Fact: 1. Subject property is a total of 103,155 square feet (2.37 acres) and a minimum of 185 feet wide; 2. Applicant seeks to locate attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District and relief from maximum height limits and sight visibility requirements as a Comprehensive Infill Development Project under Code provisions of Section 2-803.C; 3. The development potential for the entire site (Parcels A, B and C) is 93 overnight accommodation units (69 dwelling units); and 4. The existing development on the site is 115 overnight accommodation units and three dwelling units or the equivalent of 119 overnight accommodation units (the equivalent of 89 dwelling units); 5. The site is over-dense by 26 overnight accommodation units (the equivalent of 20 dwelling units); 6. The applicant seeks terminate the status of a nonconformity existing for the subject parcel (Parcels A, B and C) with regard to density to permit 119 overnight accommodation units where 93 units are permitted under the provisions of Section 6-109.C; 7. The applicant proposes a transfer of development rights (18 overnight accommodation units) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403; 8. The applicant proposes to convert a total of 137 overnight accommodation units (119 existing and 18 transferred) to 102 dwelling units (137 be .75); Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 10 of 12 • • 9. The applicant proposes and is required to file a Unity of Title joining Parcels A, B and C under the provisions of Section 4-1604; 10. The proposed, 14- and four-story building designs and architectural styles are similar in character with regard to size and scale of other buildings in the area and/or are consistent with the Design Guidelines contained within Beach by Design; 11. The applicant proposes a preliminary plat under the provisions of Division 7; Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for a Transfer of Development Rights per Section 4-1402 and 1403; 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C. 3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 4. The proposal is in compliance with the Termination of Status of a Nonconformity per Section 6- 109; 5. The proposal complies with the Preliminary Plat requirements of Division 7; 6. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. 7. The development is in compliance with the Beach Walk and Small Motel Districts within Beach by Design. Conditions of Approval: 1. That evidence of filing of a final plat with Pinellas County be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 2. That all building permits are applied for within two years (June 21, 2007) of CDB approval and that all certificates of occupancy are applied for within two years to receipt of the first building permit; 3. That a sidewalks which matches the City's Beach Walk plan with regard to materials be installed per City standards and specifications; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to signs attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final Comprehensive Sign Program package (as required) submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any sign permits which includes that: a. All signs be designed as part of an overall theme that respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building; b. All signs consist of design, colors, materials, size, shape and methods of illumination which reinforce the overall design of the fagade; c. All attached signs are installed so the method of installation is concealed or made an integral part of the design of the sign; d. All wall signs be located on flat, unadorned parts of a fagade such as the horizontal band between the storefront and second floor or on windows, awning flaps, fascia, etc.; and Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 11 of 12 0 0 e. The letter size, letter and word spacing, font style and other design elements of all signs create an overall high quality aesthetic appearance. 6. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. That revised plans be submitted which accurately depict all required erosion and sediment control techniques; 8. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 9. That all Traffic Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 10. That Open Space and Recreation Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of buildings permits or final plat (as applicable); 11. That a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 12. That the "Tree Removal" calculations be revised to reflect that palms are replaced at one inch per palm if they are greater than 10' of clear trunk; 13. That the arborists field notes are transferred in "typeset" on the Tree Inventory Plan and submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 14. That a revised site plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits which provides traffic control devices for vehicles approaching the tops and bottoms of garage ramps at 90-degree angles and that shows all drive aisles at a minimum of 24- feet in width; and 15. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives and being transferred to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard, be recorded with a notarized copy submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff. ? Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BI FLEX (FLD) I Pending casesWp for the next CDBI Gu#view S 325 Lucca Development (7) MTPI Gu?&iew S 325 Staff Report 07-19-05 CDB.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 12 of 12 r 0 CDB Date: Case Numbers: Agenda Item: Owners of Receiver Site: Owners of Sender Site Applicant: Address: June 21, 2005 TDR2005-03020 FLD2005-02021 PLT2005-00010 F-6 Americana Gulf Motels, Ltd.; Lucca Development, LLC.; Thomasz and Stella Wilk; US - Eurotrade, Inc. Fifth South, LLC (401 Coronado Drive ; Bay Lawn (406 Hamden Drive) Lucca Development, LLC. 325 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist District (Parcels A and B) and an increase in height from 30 feet to 148 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel A), an increase in the height of a parapet wall from 30 inches (2.5 feet) to seven feet (Parcel B), permit a building within the required sight visibility triangles along Coronado Drive and 51h Street and an increase in height from 30 feet to 64 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel B) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C (Parcels A, B and C), Preliminary Plat and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005- 03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. EXISTING ZONING/ LAND USE: Tourist (T) District/ Resort Facilities High (RFH) Classification BEACH BY DESIGN CHARACTER DISTRICTS: Small Motel and Beach Walk Districts Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 1 of 12 0 0 PROPERTY USES: Current Use: Overnight accommodations and attached dwellings Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (102 units. Note: Some of the submitted documents and the site plan data table reference a total of 101 proposed dwelling units. This, however, is a scrivener's error and the applicant intends to locate 102 dwelling units on the site. Of that amount, 92 units will be located within the building on Parcel A and 10 units within the building on Parcel B) ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USE: North: Tourist District - Overnight accommodations, retail, and restaurant South: Tourist District - Overnight accommodations, retail, restaurant East: Tourist District - Overnight accommodations, retail, restaurant West: Tourist District - Overnight accommodations, retail, restaurant CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: A variety of retail, overnight accommodation and restaurant uses dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The site is 2.37 acres generally bound by Hamden Drive to the east, South Gulfview Boulevard to the west and Fifth Street to the south. The subject site, consists of three parcels: Parcel A located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive), Parcel B (located between Coronado and Hamden Drives) and Parcel C located between Clearwater Harbor and Hamden Drive. All three parcels will be joined together through a unity of title prior to the issuance any building permits. Parcel A is located on the east side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 300 feet south of Third Street and 170 feet north of Fifth Street, consists of two properties (Howard Johnson Express Inn and the Americana Gulf Motel) and includes 1.41 acres. Parcel A has been developed with three buildings between one- and five- stories in height. There are a total of 69 overnight accommodation units on Parcel A. The site is currently accessed via two driveways along Coronado Drive with one each at the north and south sides of the site. A single- egress-only driveway is located centrally along the west side of the site along South Gulfview Boulevard. The existing buildings, driveways and parking spaces will be demolished with this proposal. The two properties comprising Parcel A will be joined together through a unity of title with this proposal. Parcel B is 0.93 acres, consists of three properties and is bound by Coronado and Hamden Drives to the west and east, respectively and Fifth Street to the south. Property located at 341 and 343 Coronado Drive and 342 Hamden Drive border the north side of Parcel B and are not part of this proposal. Parcel B has been developed with four, one-story and two, two-story buildings with a total of 46 overnight accommodation units and three dwelling units. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 2 of 12 Access to Parcel B is characterized by several undefined driveways along Coronado and Hamden Drives which provide direct access to parking spaces which back out directly into those abutting public rights-of-way. The existing buildings, driveways and parking spaces will be demolished with this proposal. The three properties comprising Parcel B will be joined together through a unity of title with this proposal. Parcel C, associated and currently joined together with two properties included with Parcel B, is 0.03 acres and has been development with two docks (four slips). Approximately half of the parcel is joined with 346 Hamden Drive (currently the Albatross Motel) and the other half is joined with 350 Hamden Drive (currently the Tropicana Motel). The two existing docks will remain with this proposal and will serve as an accessory use for the remainder of the development consisting of Parcels A and B. Parcels A, B and C in their entireties will be joined together through a unity of title with this proposal. Although Parcels A and B and B and C are each separated by public rights-of-way (Coronado and Hamden Drives, respectively), Section 4-160 LC allows for lots to be joined together through a unity of title provided no more than 100 feet of public right-of-way separates them. Density Calculations: The Resort Facilities High (RFH) FLUP category permits up to 40 overnight accommodation units or 30 dwelling units per acre. Parcels a, B and C are all within the RFH FLUP category. There is a 75 percent conversion rate between overnight accommodation and dwelling units. Parcel A, at 1.41 acres in area, is permitted 56 overnight accommodation units (42 dwelling units) (1.41 by 40). The site currently has 13 overnight accommodation units in excess of the maxim otherwise permitted by the FLUP. Parcel B (0.93 acres), as outlined, includes 46 overnight accommodation units and three dwelling units (the equivalent of four overnight accommodation units) or 50 overnight accommodation units. Parcel B is permitted up 37 overnight accommodation units (0.93 by 40). The site also has 13 overnight accommodation units in excess of the maximum otherwise permitted by the FLUP. In determining maximum permitted density, the City of Clearwater rounds down to the nearest whole dwelling unit. In other words, should, the raw density for a site yield 9.9999999 dwelling units, the City will round down that figure resulting in a permitted density of nine dwelling units NOT 10. The total permitted density of Parcels A, B and C is 93 overnight accommodation units where 119 units exist. This results in a total excess of 26 overnight accommodation units. A termination of status of nonconformity to permit the existing density on Parcels A, B and C to remain on the site is part of this proposal. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 3 of 12 Proposal: The proposal includes a Transfer of Development Rights (18 overnight accommodation units), the construction of 102 dwelling units within two structures with one structure 148 feet in height and the other 64 feet in height and permitting a building to be located within required sight visibility triangles. The proposal also includes a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for existing, excess density (26 overnight accommodation units). These requests are examined individually in greater detail below. Transfer of Development Rights: This proposal includes the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) of 18 overnight accommodation units to this site (Parcels A, B and C) from 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives. The maximum number of permitted units for 406 Hamden Drive is 12 units (the site currently has an occupational license for 15 overnight accommodation units). The maximum number of permitted units for 401 Coronado Drive is six overnight accommodation units. The total, maximum number of permitted overnight accommodation units permitted on the donor site (401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives) is 18 units. The maximum number of units permitted to be transferred from 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives may not exceed the otherwise maximum permitted by the Resort Facilities High (RFH) FLUP category (18 overnight accommodation units). Therefore, should the termination of status of nonconformity be approved for this site three overnight accommodation units will remain on the site without the possibility of being used elsewhere. Should those units be removed prior to an approval as part of a termination of the status of a nonconforming use (15 hotel units where 12 hotel units are permitted) the units will not be permitted to be re-established on the site. The Code, under the provisions of Section 4-1403.E.3, and Beach by Design allows the use of TDRs provided both the sender and receiving sites are located within the Beach by Design redevelopment area. In addition, the maximum number of units which may be transferred to a receiver site may not exceed 20 percent of the permitted development potential of the site prior to the transfer (Section 4-1402.4). The maximum development potential for Parcels A, B and C is 93 overnight accommodation units. Therefore, 20 percent of the maximum number of permitted overnight accommodation units (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) is 18 units. The proposal is in compliance with the Plan policy regarding TDRs and the standards and criteria set forth in Community Development Code Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. A site plan for this site, the donor parcel, has not yet been submitted to the City for review. Parcel A: The proposal includes 92 attached dwellings within a single building 148 feet in height (as measured from base flood elevation) centrally located on the site. The building will be located approximately 17 feet from the front (west) property line along South Gulfview Boulevard, 15 feet from the side (north, south and west) property lines and 15 feet from the front (east) property line along Coronado Drive. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 4 of 12 0 0 A total of 137 parking spaces will be provided under the building at grade and on the second floor where the Code requires 1.5 parking spaces (138 spaces) per dwelling unit be provided. Parcel B, examined in greater detail below, provides and additional 102 parking spaces where 10 are required for that portion of the site. A total of 239 parking spaces are provide (2.34 spaces per unit) where 153 spaces (1.5 space per unit) are required. A single, two-way driveway located along Coronado Drive will serve the site. The proposal includes the installation of landscaping around the perimeter of the site consistent with the intent of Beachwalk and the Code including India hawthorn, sea grape, viburnum, crepe myrtle, oleander and sabal palms. The main entrance to the high-rise building will be along South Gulfview Boulevard and incorporates arched elements, canopies, balconies and an extensive use of windows as part of a Mediterranean-Influenced architectural style. The proposed materials will be painted stucco with natural colors and a terra cotta tile roof. The increase in height above 35 feet is consistent with the Beach Walk District of Beach by Design which calls for creating a "world class" address for revitalized properties. The design of the building is consistent with the Design Guidelines section of Beach by Design. The building presents a finished primary facade towards the South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive rights-of-way. The proposed materials will be stucco, limestone balustrades, wrought iron railings and a terra cotta barrel tile roof. Architectural details include green, fabric awnings, raised window trim and coping differentiating the third, fifth, tenth and fourteenth floors. While the main roof extends to 148 feet in height, architectural embellishments, an additional 16 feet in height, conceal elevator shafts and provide additional visual interest. The area is characterized by several existing or approved, but as of yet un-built, taller buildings including the existing Adam's Mark Hotel (155 feet) and the proposed Hyatt Hotel (150 feet). The remainder of the buildings in the area constitutes a great range of height from 15 to 60 feet. An extensive use of stepbacks and articulation of the fenestration minimize the height and bulk of the building. The building is further articulated through the use of recesses and projections to vary its width, building stories are differentiated by architectural features including cornice lines and balconies. Stepbacks are provided along all facades beginning at the third floor through the top floor including a stepback of 24 feet at the 1 lth floor (approximately 110 feet) on the north, south and west side and a stepback of 32 feet at the 14th floor (approximately 140 feet) on the west side. This results in extensive negative and positive space on all sides of the building adding to the visual aesthetics. All facades of the building utilizes the same high level of detail and architectural embellishments as the formal front (west facade) of the building facing South Gulfview Boulevard. The building provides for a floor plate less then 25,000 square feet for all floors between 42 and 100 feet and averages less than 10,000 square feet per floor above 100 feet. The building meets all requirements of Beach by Design and its Design Guidelines. Solid waste services will be provided via one solid waste staging area at the southeast corner of the site. All stormwater requirements have been met with this proposal with the site. No signage is proposed with this application however should a sign package be submitted it would need to meet all Code requirements. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 5 of 12 Parcel A has been developed with two overnight accommodation establishments (Howard Johnson Express Inn and the Americana Motel) on two properties with a total of 69 overnight accommodation units. Under the Resort Facilities High (RFH) FLUP category 56 overnight accommodation units are permitted on this site. The site currently has 13 overnight accommodation units in excess of the maxim otherwise permitted by the FLUP. A termination of status of nonconformity to permit the existing density to remain on the site is part of this proposal. The proposal is in compliance with the Community Development Code standards and criteria set forth in Section 6-109.C for a termination of status as a nonconformity. Parcels B and C: The proposal includes 10 attached dwellings within a building 50 feet in height. The building will occupy almost the entire site and will be located between 15 and 16 feet from any property line. A total of 102 parking spaces will be provided under the building at grade and on the second floor where the Code requires 1.5 parking spaces. As outlined above in the analysis for Parcel A, a total of 237 parking spaces will be provided for the entire development where 153 spaces are required. Two, two-way driveways, with one centrally located along Coronado Drive and a second on the east 'side of the site along 51h Street, will serve the site. The proposal includes the installation of landscaping around the perimeter of the site consistent with the intent of Beachwalk and the Code including India hawthorn, sea grape, viburnum, crepe myrtle, oleander and sabal palms. The main entrance to the high-rise building will be along South Gulfview Boulevard and incorporates arched elements, canopies, balconies and an extensive use of windows as part of a Mediterranean-Influenced architectural style. The proposed materials will be painted stucco with natural colors and a terra cotta tile roof. The increase in height above 35 feet is consistent with the Small Motel District of Beach by Design. The design of the building, which will complement the building located to the west on Parcel A, is also consistent with Beach by Design. The building presents a finished primary facade towards the South GulfView Boulevard and Coronado Drive rights-of-way. The proposed materials will be stucco, limestone balustrades, wrought iron railings and a terra cotta barrel tile roof. Architectural details include green, fabric awnings, raised window trim and coping differentiating the third and fifth floors. The building is articulated through the use of recesses and projections to vary its width, building stories are differentiated by architectural features including cornice lines, balconies and coping and stepbacks are provided at the upper floors on all facades. The increase in height above 35 feet to 50 feet is consistent with the Small Motel District of Beach by Design and will serve as an adequate transition area between the Brightwater Drive area of the Small Motel District, which, in that specific location, limits the height of development to two- to four-stories above parking, and the Beach Walk District, which allows for more intense development. While the main roof extends to 50 feet in height a parapet roof structure extends up to an additional seven feet above the roof deck where an additional 2.5 is otherwise permitted. Additional architectural embellishments, concealing mechanical equipment and an elevator shaft, extends 16 feet above the roof deck, is permitted by Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 6 of 12 Code and provides additional visual interest. Consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design, the building incorporates articulation of the fenestration along the front (east and west) and side (north and south) facades. The front (east and west0 facades provide significant stepbacks of a minimum of 36 feet at the first floor. The side (north facades) provides smaller setbacks of approximately four feet at the first floor. In addition, the east facade of the building utilizes the same level of detail and architectural embellishments as the front (west facade) of the building facing Coronado Drive. Solid waste services will be provided via a fully enclosed trash staging area at the northeast corner of the building staff of the condominium will bring the containers out on pick-up days and return them to the staging area after servicing. All stormwater requirements have been met with this proposal with the site. No signage is proposed with this application however should a sign package be submitted it would need to, meet all Code requirements. The two docks located on Parcel C will be maintained with this proposal and will serve the dwelling units on Parcels A and B. Parcel B has been developed with two overnight accommodation establishments (the Tropicana and Albatross Motels) with a total of 46 overnight accommodation units and three dwelling units (equivalent of four overnight accommodation units) where the Resort Facilities High (RFH) FLUP category permits up to 37 units on this size site. The site currently has 13 overnight accommodation units in excess of the maximum otherwise permitted by the FLUP. A termination of status of nonconformity to permit the existing density to remain on the site is part of this proposal. The proposal is in compliance with the Community Development Code standards and criteria set forth in Section 6-109.C for a termination of status as a nonconformity. Code Enforcement Analysis: Outstanding Code enforcement issues associated with this site include non-compliant signage, general overgrowth of plant material and weeds, storage of inoperative vehicles, poorly maintained building, grass parking, parking areas in poor repair and outdoor storage. These issues will be eliminated with the redevelopment of this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: Code Sections 2-801 and 2-802): Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent DENSITY (40 OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATION UNITS/AC OR 30DU/AC; 93 OVERNIGHT 43.04 du/ac; 102 du X ACCOMMODAITON UNITS OR 69 DU IMPERVIOUS SURACE 0.70 X RATIO ISR 0.95 LOT AREA (10,000 sq.ft.) 103,155.11 square feet (2.37 acres) X Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 7 of 12 • • Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent LOT WIDTH (100 feet) Parcel A: 240 feet X Parcel B: 185 feet HEIGHT (35 - 50 FEET) Parcel A: 148 feet X Parcel B: 64 feet PARKING SPACES (1.5 SPACE PER DU; 153 2.34 spaces per du; 239 spaces X SPACES) * See staff analysis above. COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS STANDARDS Section 4-1403): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting property. X 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. X 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for X development. 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of X Clearwater as a whole. COMPLIANCE WITH TERMINATION OF STATUS AS A NONCONFORMITY STANDARDS (Section 6-109): Consistent Inconsistent 1 Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3- X 1202(D) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping X standards established in Section 3-1202(E). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, X removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign X programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 8 of 12 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. X 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value X thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation X impacts on adjacent properties. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Code Section 2-803.C): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the X fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. X 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the X immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the X community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-Avenue parking are justified by the benefits to community X character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of X the parcel proposed for development. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 9 of 12 Consistent Inconsistent 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District X design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on May 5, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist District (Parcels A and B) and an increase in height from 30 feet to 148 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel A), an increase in the height of a parapet wall from 30 inches (2.5 feet) to seven feet (Parcel B), permit a building within the required sight visibility triangles along Coronado Drive and 5th Street and an increase in height from 30 feet to 64 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel B) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C (Parcels A, B and C), Preliminary Plat and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4- 1402 and 4-1403 for the site at 325 South Gulfview Boulevard, based on the following recommended findings of fact, recommended conclusions of law and with conditions: Recommended Findings of Fact: 1. Subject property is a total of 103,155 square feet (2.37 acres) and a minimum of 185 feet wide; 2. Applicant seeks to locate attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District and relief from maximum height limits and sight visibility requirements as a Comprehensive Infill Development Project under Code provisions of Section 2-803.C; 3. The development potential for the entire site (Parcels A, B and C) is 93 overnight accommodation units (69 dwelling units); and 4. The existing development on the site is 115 overnight accommodation units and three dwelling units or the equivalent of 119 overnight accommodation units (the equivalent of 89 dwelling units); 5. The site is over-dense by 26 overnight accommodation units (the equivalent of 20 dwelling units); 6. The applicant seeks terminate the status of a nonconformity existing for the subject parcel (Parcels A, B and C) with regard to density to permit 119 overnight accommodation units where 93 units are permitted under the provisions of Section 6-109.C; 7. The applicant proposes a transfer of development rights (18 overnight accommodation units) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403; 8. The applicant proposes to convert a total of 137 overnight accommodation units (119 existing and 18 transferred) to 102 dwelling units (137 be .75); 9. The applicant proposes and is required to file a Unity of Title joining Parcels A, B and C under the provisions of Section 4-1604; 10. The proposed, 14- and four-story building designs and architectural styles are similar in character with regard to size and scale of other buildings in the area and/or are consistent with the Design Guidelines contained within Beach by Design; Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 10 of 12 11. The applicant proposes a preliminary plat under the provisions of Division 7; Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for a Transfer of Development Rights per Section 4-1402 and 1403; 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C. 3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 4. The proposal is in compliance with the Termination of Status of a Nonconformity per Section 6- 109; 5. The proposal complies with the Preliminary Plat requirements of Division 7; 6. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. 7. The development is in compliance with the Beach Walk and Small Motel Districts within Beach by Design. Conditions of Approval: 1. That evidence of filing of a final plat with Pinellas County be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 2. That all building permits are applied for within two years (June 21, 2007) of CDB approval and that all certificates of occupancy are applied for within two years to receipt of the first building permit; 3. That a sidewalks which matches the City's Beach Walk plan with regard to materials be installed per City standards and specifications; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to signs attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final Comprehensive Sign Program package (as required) submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any sign permits which includes that: a. All signs be designed as part of an overall theme that respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building; b. All signs consist of design, colors, materials, size, shape and methods of illumination which reinforce the overall design of the fagade; c. All attached signs are installed so the method of installation is concealed or made an integral part of the design of the sign; d. All wall signs be located on flat, unadorned parts of a fagade such as the horizontal band between the storefront and second floor or on windows, awning flaps, fascia, etc.; and e. The letter size, letter and word spacing, font style and other design elements of all signs create an overall high quality aesthetic appearance. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 11 of 12 6. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. That revised plans be submitted which accurately depict all required erosion and sediment control techniques; 8. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 9. That all Traffic Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 10. That Open Space and Recreation Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of buildings permits or final plat (as applicable); 11. That a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 12. That the "Tree Removal" calculations be revised to reflect that palms are replaced at one inch per palm if they are greater than 10' of clear trunk; 13. That the arborists field notes are transferred in "typeset" on the Tree Inventory Plan and submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 14. That a revised site plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits which provides traffic control devices for vehicles approaching the tops and bottoms of garage ramps at 90-degree angles and that shows all drive aisles at a minimum of 24- feet in width; and 15. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives and being transferred to 325 South Gulfview Boulevard, be recorded with a notarized copy submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (401 Coronado and 406 Hamden Drives) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: - Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next DRCIGulfview S 325 Lucca DevelopmentlGu?&iew S 325 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005 Cases FLD2005-02021; TDR2005-03020; PLT2005-00010 Page 12 of 12 • 1 301 1 25> Q 301 i? -- 300 i I _ At i - Ov ni l?lL 1_l Park ' Ac om ?Qn&' r_1 ernight i 316 t1_ 3 -- _ _ 11 1 r Res ccommodations P____ 7 Ret 1 1 ? ` O ice ' ! -O might s U- 25 an -- A o ; vo A coi imodations "3p-- IL ' l /--I ? ,1 ; 1 , ? tlE C w ; w w O J ;; - i Ov rn' J 1 341 BR/?y A r ER DR A I'O 1 ``-W21 ;3Qe1i?i m r4__ L34, !3518 34@ -J it , I T, w w ?. w I__? _ c ? I + *rni m ?' Q o Single-family residential -- n ` -, _, 1 1 4081 f I r., J 1'--__?_ 7 4P9 `-- _ I I ! / Q _ 1 I i -I Overni t A ?* mdd4 'o t' --- 412 ?.-s-------^ + ti `• ?'=-?1 1 n % -: 421 C_--1 I ! / B ? _ 4)'S/DE' pR ' ' , -42,0 41s _ _ _ I I ( t % t-1 420 Lam' _ _?! ! _? w X431 ^ - r-I Existing Surrounding Land Uses Map Americana Gulf Motels, Ltd.; Lucca TDR2005-03020 Owner. Development LLC; Tomasz & Stella Wilk US - Case: FLD2005-02021 Eurotrade, Inc. PLT2005-00010 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. consisting of: 325 S. Property Site: Gulfview Blvd., 326, 345, 347, 353, Coronado Size(Acres): 2.37 Dr. and 346 and 350 Hamden Dr. 07-29-15-52380-000-0630 and 1110 RECEIVER SITE PIN: 08-29-15-17586-001-0120, 0130 and0140 08-29-15-17604-000-0100 and 0080 Atlas Page: 276A 0 M Rxxwwr ? P? ? W P01W PAPAYA t ST W GORY PA85Pa>: ?SD O Cr+sw'+ ana WNMA90 P E @R O FPtar ar PROJECT TMRp ar SITE 9QQHr WATER OR ' Pi aAYSICE $ BAND r 9? A? SS Location Map Americana Gulf Motels, Ltd.; Lucca TDR2005-03020 Owner. Development LLC; Tomasz & Stella Wilk US - Case: FLD2005-02021 Eurotrade, Inc. PLT2005-00010 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. consisting of: 325 S. Property Site: Gulfview Blvd., 326, 345, 347, 353, Coronado Size(Acres): 2.37 Dr. and 346 and 350 Hamden Dr. 07-29-15-52380-000-0630 and 1110 RECEIVER SITE PIN: 08-29-15-17586-001-0120, 0130 and0140 08-29-15-17604-000-0100 and 0080 Atlas Page: 276A 301 1 I I 251 t --__f 30f ?? 300 L L _ _ti 1305 I r r-- 31f , 312 1_" i-_ f--? 31 ' 316 V f915?__! f_r ! ? t 3 FH _ 1 1T L?1.4.? 1 316 132 { L `- `I ' JJ -i 1 I `-3Z6 1 I 13 „} f 25 - V I _ LI 325 I ; , f L 1 1331 330 ' RFH 1 'i / •__1 11 1 r_ f- L? 1 ?_ li 1 f 1 - }w?/OC { V V \`` f J ' 341 ) ?Oj f _W2 1 IQ 1 If _ f (34611 w0 31 -I - 3?s _846 - J 1 , ; R f w w 10 f f 11 ? ? 1 I , 1 _- i 1 ?f 34s1 _? 11 i j f j `'- ` ----- 13 e? 9 v! Irlw---------1 1,--------i WATER I f ?_ , 1 406 411 L'r06 40s 1 I ! `? _ 1! - - 1 ' 415 1 ?l Q 410 1 -------- 7 Lf ?-' -- - _ 1 412 L + t J ( n -- f 421 `--+1 I I Q Bq y p -alp Z -41s ? - S/ E DR _ y L 420 +' 1 {-l l++' _?_% 1 6f-i w -?" I r-w I 1 ` 1 r 1 1 _ ! " RFH - '+- `- _ 14310 Future Land Use Plan Map Americana Gulf,Motels, Ltd.; Lucca TDR2005-03020 Owner: Development LLC; Tomasz & Stella Wilk US - Case: FLD2005-02021 Eurotrade, Inc. PLT2005-00010 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. consisting of: 325 S. Property Site: Gulfview Blvd., 326, 345, 347, 353, Coronado Size(Acres): 2.37 Dr. and 346 and 350 Hamden Dr. 07-29-15-52380-000-0630 and 1110 RECEIVER SITE PIN: 08-29-15-17586-001-0120, 0130 and0140 08-29-15-17604-000-0 100 and 0080 Atlas Page: 276A • r ? • Iy r I w• = w gym Y ?_ . ` ._ r ?,+• _ ???? iii ?rlir _ I T k r 74- r t L W/ 14 littf d _ o t i I r +p • ?? s r - - - w. ??? +d 40 `I L V ? ? Irk Aerial Map Americana Gulf Motels, Ltd.; Lucca TDR2005-03020 Owner: Development LLC; Tomasz & Stella Wilk US - Case: FLD2005-02021 Eurotrade, Inc. PLT2005-00010 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. consisting of: 325 S. Property Site: Gulfview Blvd., 326, 345, 347, 353, Coronado Size(Acres): 2.37 Dr. and 346 and 350 Hamden Dr. 07-29-15-52380-000-0630 and 1110 RECEIVER SITE PIN: 08-29-15-17586-001-0120, 0130 and0140 08-29-15-17604-000-0 100 and 0080 Atlas Paqe: 276A r?] j 301 j 251 rr? 301 t' 300 I r- I x``' -Jr l_I Q - I _tr ? O 13na 13091 ? - 1 31? 1 312 -- I ,.! 311 1 1 0 1 I s at---1 1317 L__ ! f32 ' ` CJ -- 325 I j I ? l V 1 OS/W .33 t ) ? 337 % `!1 I r- 1_ -?4 I1 AY j _ ' ' {341 BR/Gy w ? tr ? 1 WATFR DIQ 1Iy1,? I045 t I -7° ! -348 _.1 t ?! w f: w I-_y?Y ff ' i p 1 1 I _ ----I ` --? ` A !I r? t` I i? r I I Sr I I-- _ J I 406 411 j j 4091 __j , / 1 1 ?_L 410 1 ----- j 1418 --- vim" 12 4 421 It &A ? 1 at_ w ? ^' ?___l I - 1 l i 420 / I Zoning Map Americana Gulf Motels, Ltd.; Lucca TDR2005-03020 Owner. Development LLC; Tomasz St Stella Wilk US - Case: FLD2005-02021 Eurotrade, Inc. PLT2005-00010 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. consisting of: 325 S. Property Site: Gulfview Blvd., 326, 345, 347, 353, Coronado Size(Acres): 2.37 Dr. and 346 and 350 Hamden Dr. 0 7-29 -15-52380-000-0630 and 1110 RECEIVER SITE PIN: 08-29-15-17586-001-0120, 0130 and0140 08-29-15-17604-000-0100 and 0080 Atlas Page: 276A 0 0 0 v 0 2-inch by 2-inch Map Owner. Fifth South, LLC. (401 Comado Drive) Case: TDR2005-03020 FLD2005-02021 Bay Lawn (406 Hamden Drive) PLT2005-00010 Site: 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive I Property Size(Acres): 0.45 PIN: 08-29-15-17622- 000-0010 SENDER SITE 08-29-15-17622-000-0110 Atlas Page: 276A 8 0 B,4YMONT 3r ?70FF P"- ?I U ? L • ?WW 6 "^?N POWT PAPAYA ST s P,FSppE PW 0 Bid VVWMARO SAGE RR RRSrD Sr oo naRp DR 4 sr t PROJECT O?s SITE Rr WATER OR 6AYSDE OA I ? s A? SS Location Map Owner: Fifth South, LLC. (401 Comado Drive) Case: TDR2005-03020 FLD2005-02021 Bay Lawn (406 Hamden Drive) PLT2005-00010 Site: 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive Property Size(Acres): 0.45 PIN: 08-29-15-17622-000-0010 SENDER SITE 08-29-15-17622-000-0110 Atlas Page: 276A i 0 Aerial Photograph PIN: 08-29-15-17622-000-0010 SENDER SITE 0&29-15-17622-000-0110 Atlas Page: 276A i U--- 325 --; 1 o 1 1 1 RFH tI - ! t - 1 - ; 1 1 ; 351 't •_ -,r.,- 1 ? ??r N '1B 2 11 1 1 1' ?` w I - 1 3471 1 RIOS 3e -`-------' V ti I/V---------- I ---------- ; WATER 406 411 L40&. Z 1 I I f -? L F - --? 410 1 - ---- ?_` ?_ , I ata 421 D ? R • n 420-; / `-- % - --_l r t6t-, w 7 .4 - • J -? ?- 1 ; 1 1, -, ?' _ ; ` 'Ig31A} 1 _ I „? gal k3O ' P I H R Fif - / L 446 \\\ /, Future Land Use Map Fifth South, LLC. (401 Corrado Drive) TDR2005-03020 Owner. Bay Lawn (406 Hamden Drive) Case: FLD2005-02021 PLT2005-00010 Site: 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive es 0.45 Size(Ac ): 08-29-15-17622-000-0010 SENDER SITE PIN: 08-29-15-17622-000-0110 Atlas Page: 276A r ras 13 -- i) ! i -1-? 3 25 i ' ' ' ' I I -' v right; ' 1 mo ` o r 1 Park ?' - Ac omlhod, ati n 3 ?, a e 1 v _r L iI t Re _ ERR `--a ?? s2? p --_ s 40 er, L- 3q da 'on r r ' ' n 1353 47r y 0 ernigk-11' mod 'o 406 g 411 + L__ I 408 I , r -- - =r'--?a- 410 1 ], I cc 1415 I ns ?r 412 ? ? »>tght? ' I • .• n 1 r -o- 421 a-_? % ?l i.1 \431 t ' j \ . Q -? \ 1 V1 \ t" \ ?' ,' " X431- " 1 V 16.W Overnight cc ` mo?latio \ i \\- 446 Existing Surrounding Land Uses Map Owner. Fifth South, LLC. (401 Comado Drive) Case: TDR2005-03020 FLD2005-02021 Bay Lawn (406 Hamden Drive) PLT2005-00010 Site: 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive Size(Ac es): 0.45 PIN: 08-29-15-17622-000-0010 SENDER SITE 08-29-15-17622-000-0110 Atlas Page: 276A 0 0 r 301 I 261 1 --? r- r- j Q 301 it- 300,' i 1 _ L_y 1 3 1306 - ; - 1 _rJ 1Xg`r tJ ? 1300- 1 4 t ; 312 '- 314.) ^ ,J I / 0 r 1 3f4 r---j1 318 V tyry-__.; I-r-t- i / 6 t3y 1 3216 r -321 f I I_ J r r 1_-? - I? t I___ r J92 _ I ~ U - 325 1 I 1 ! G o I OS/R 1 zr-..? - -- " I r 33j ; -'- - r- l? t o L r h I ? > ? ?] _ 11341 114/ AR DR a 347 ??_, 1 _ t / -.r 1t345i;i ?? `_P, iasi ` _ f _n --•o Z ? i 1! 1 1 r ? r ?'I ? i ? r'------- 408 ?_/ r I I 9 411 1 _i r 409x1 1 ty-- 'J Pq I --410 I I I 2 ? L? i? 1 i, ! __?_--- - `- t-t?Ll ?? t i '-- 415 1! vt26-rl Q 410 1 412 ----------- L_rn 421 ; BA YSlDE © R ------ 420 431 1 ! 4 -1 Zoning Map Americana Gulf Motels, Ltd.; Lucca TDR2005-03020 Owner. Development LLC; Tomasz & Stella Wilk US - Case: FLD2005-02021 Eurotrade, Inc. PLT2005-00010 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. consisting of: 325 S. Site: Gulfview Blvd., 326, 345, 347, 353, Coronado Property 2 37 Size(Acres): . Dr, and 346 and 350 Hamden Dr. 07-29-15-52380-000-0630 and 1110 08-29-15-17586-001-0120 RECEIVER SITE PIN: , 0130 and0140 08-29-15-17604-000-0100 and 0080 Atlas Page: 276A ? wN ?.« NOR Y• NN.--w I Looking west from Coronado Drive. Looking northwest from Coronado Drive. 'c T 7 Looking northwest from Coronado Drive. Parcel A highlighted in dark green. 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site) - Parcel A FLD2005-02021 TDR2005-03020 Looking east from public parking lot. Looking northeast from South Gulfview Blvd. Looking southwest from Prospect Avenue. Looking southwest from corner of Prospect Looking east from abutting alley. The low Avenue and alley. white building on the left is on the subject site. Looking west. Parcel B highlighted in dark green. 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) - Parcel B FLD2005-02021 TDR2005-03020 Looking northwest. WOW Looking southeast. -- - __ -- - ? 7 -- 7.- Parcel C highlighted in dark green. 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (receiver site) - Parcel C FLD2005-02021 TDR2005-03020 Looking northeast. Looking east. Looking southwest from corner of Hamden Dr. and 51' St. Looking south from corner of Hamden Dr. and 51' St. Looking northwest from Hamden Dr.. Looking northwest. 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) FLD2005-02021 TDR2005-03020 Looking east from Coronado Dr. and 51 St.. Looking southeast from 5' St.. 0 I 2-inch by 2-inch Map Americana Gulf Motels, Ltd.; Lucca TDR2005-03020 Owner. Development LLC; Tomasz & Stella Wilk US - Case: FLD2005-02021 Eurotrade, Inc. PLT2005-00010 325 S. Gulfview Blvd. consisting of: 325 S. Property Site: Gulfview Blvd., 326, 345, 347, 353, Coronado Size(Acres): 2.37 Dr. and 346 and 350 Hamden Dr. 07-29-15-52380-000-0630 and 1110 RECEIVER SITE PIN: 08-29-15-17586-001-0120, 0130 and0140 08-29-15-17604-000-0100 and 0080 Atlas Page: 276A 267A JL b) ! eurn IEr e 1 ?Lr 11G1-\.lV (.l• l.1 TV j - - -- - r I f ; -, w- E c _Dfilres . 7 ,a k tvn,- ; e der Site -D oos-o3 20 14 -02021 )2' . r - ?»1 a ..-..+ '`:;. •" ? %? . ! 0 11101 ?` eE>aaR 1n. / :f ;•` 1f '"..?. CI..E I.i.' ..._.__._ I' ..3'' .. . a n .._ . __ r ^Tk's r e ' ? b: -..-1.-4 ! 7 i zi. l w l " -I n if '? , ! J a 1 • I --7°s'---- u 111 I? y._ fl . rA il(A ;L ° ?_ •I .a 'r ' ? " • ? j - aaaso 11 t I ? 1 444- ! I I - R,l - 6uo r--1 --j - - r'14 ie `'`r ° is I K 1 11 rhfl0i » 'y ?? 1, 4 NAFJ' 6910. • ?a - - { i J ` ? I .. e? J P ` I j A.. w ? `- - i ; rr t.' ?. '.,' Fl'ar f, j Y "rl n,l ry5 «1 a Y ?;. N` 4 1 A? l ° _ j' ?'r,.-- wnlz - _, __.... -' ? ; „ -l-na F » • - -' j ? ' « ° ` ° r t r n } 7 k t X1-. e r r .i I ?,? » » ?. rl D :.; ; `w ; ? ; ? ;^- ^ ? e r ^ _.. verso 1 wave a A/c • ? i K "? ?"? - - . . 1 >, _ P < ?r -r L 2w1 « i Q T e r I ?? ? `]9116 ? 'A ? rr•T? S ' ?? F dl F1 ' ll'-T 1 f ?? ' n e ._ . tir _ ----------------- --------- ._.-_--_.._.-_-._. r-- -- 'Tro6a6+ ? r - -t ! V .r ? 4 •040,4 ..1 ?:ec 1 I sow ? ? P `N - - ? /' ? ` ?-r ? ) 1» `oa' esn ,,.e,, Best, / • C pt "_Uearwater V PREPARED BIr PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING I CIS 100 S, Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33766 Ph.:(727)562.4750,Fax: (727)626-4765 www.MyClearwater.com cncuArkkr Pwb4c ft-w 4r daek h fu: rAW by bn My a CW1 r Pybrt WolesAdnfinej ,,,'p ZIOHdv wd r brae-W rndar tMa-Cftll wY1 N! 11MVAaa:Rp OW. V.d 1e "d W 610"dN Irk a'WA-dde ON-12 a 0MO.t WaOtMIM 111V W A. C k Ne Cg/of Gebt PWAIE maba m,onem'aa. eapreseeiahlP7ae.??d,e I acar o.1 4bMAa,M1A1KArI,PJ- WlMa dah osl,mCNer,w. Fa Hrw rlon.tM 01-4 .f w.1h "msrnH PWAE A1E rn Aenk'y Mrr'soe,er asaomd?Y M1A:M rrse o!lnaute tl wM dMe N WF. ,. Fan rs o aw S RESS)a.TUx pstalCs Inn -I.:..c.•rly waAa,a lAl]R •Lew CMwn brAaV Naarnt al ktoe •wdrar o.rdy n..:wua' -kA,akar kadr OanRelnkMal HCR HCR -gip-Melt' RU Vrr>d FH? -kbGraYxa?Ah CANbO-Ca yre,FTMOMam:Canr«aW.• wary uata[I IFIKOD -I,IArk iaYM Nrq!ballaae GnwaYelr =Wa.rgaaYJ :OWSRO1?09'WCTY iPECW'JSF giTRGr4 0. RT.IdmLl n.aa.n Tadrabp T CST: Wi. eemn O.?- III City Owned Property A Agreement to Annex I1 Annexation Deannexatlon Correction Rezoning Caa'? ] SUB NUMBER ('. Refer to Plat) BLOCK NUMBER SUB PARCEL NUMBER cl!R) PARCEL NUMBER (M&S) LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY J COUNTY HIGHWAY O STATEHIGHWAY M U.S. HIGHWAY 4/ Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Apr 07, 2005 SW 114 of 32.28-16 276A • • 267A ?11 I 1 k ' 1 l e Cle r ?" L am ater oe.e„ kir , la n/ I ' mad Ham" . " F-1 - U PREPARED BY LL A, j-r! for I I ! ,) 4 i '. PUBL ADMINISTRATION 9RA 74- i rl + -`ems'-"'- r •• ••-'•? ENGNEERNG10 - ---_..r: ? •.? der Site ' , _- ; , 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33766 727 Ph 6 4765 r ; - ! (i • I ' ' T .: 1 ww My e ? tL m ! I • t - • 3 w . C[ rv wa 2 r co a j - D' 005-0 20 I « ' ! ac .?. 1 +'-+; - ! _ •' i l-•--•--__)._..! Lr "I_'? '.'??II--"'-•'r ./'4 i ! I Y• , wx:rr»...!s,"dmr,ravraera.cyaCW? v NONE hp. m C b Ad P Vr g e -.i ? jj? 2' ANN D I D IttA AM O MIS Mt enduMJl/d reb?bnr WlR rM Vrb.YMtl!n rM!MOa!e AS SJ°A!M Gk apHnuSMGWArE lfNee 1 I --_. °.___ '? ! «?.w_"-._. e1 '?. ,,,o .....e •.: ,: ".! I ai ? ? • _ r . maY.ano,ee"snJee.a DreemC a.lnA'"d.:wwemrpMe auwsc wrr nesaSVa mexi amle deb rren !°I°nru I --^ i _ rr, , '! ''=-I"' r ?. , 0 / y. P . y y ! r ? ; ? It. nr ` !'« {? aa-1 1«. ! r i ?s .. ?~Q-?? I1 I ! ? __.? .__..??' ? ( - ? I N r ! w I"i " ! 1 ?r FI " i!q i w P o.« 11 41 1. •..'. ) ` « r} "'- I ' - ` -^ ?'-- 1 "wrnr or. MOE"TOLL 01MT s ?,_I t ,« i 1 ? _e,w w-ap eaaaa+iol uAOa •s<w l.,asun or.nIr.earma As ! HCR 1 i ra:oo: ??rn.aro«A:ac..,.Tx:•. cp A`-. ? I ?t •) r IENCOO y1WneY ?!igManaae Cenawrbn _..L_ I j . I -? _ r--I i '_r,-'-? :,`(?. 'I'? ' ? •,? _" ' L./>: ` ! " rsno ? {?aNee• ?j r-- -1 r - ? \ " _ -/ I ^•_?a ,r. Cdr x' J T--1 Jef°0' d9Ja L_ J J !an• r COMFSP:IA_C4iTRIC18 WFGK'JBi ClSitiL^TB O.w. Iw-Mxbl M.."d.tlT-gy r. J 1 r s L ' ?_ mA-o-W msa,m o °a _ :,.,n., o.c r.a:nam a.: r0" N' I T e r P` " rt "I 1 City Owned Property U t _ t _ _ r ° ^ r R ,? ' rr e « m . Agreement to Annex _01 ref ?Ir!I ?T, 7; ? _ .7 u4"•ar .I?1? 4P` ?'i'(rrl? ' ? Annexation Deannex$tion _ „ - ` `-, `=- - t « r _ `? " s Correction Rezoning i L L.°ar J e• J r I _ ! " , - P • 1 -? ° ~ef 3U6 NUMBER (' - Refer to Peet) E- om I BLOCK NUMBER ` / i $ ` J A 1, r SUB PARCEL NUMBER ' t 1 ` I `_ "T ^"1-1-ice - •At' n . _ - r•! t a ` l r r' Cszm j PARCEL NUMBER (M68) i •, t If T.: c , ,,, ?1 , t i7 j ,- i.'• . __ + ! ' E ' l t •1 tl ' :? ` ` tl ?.- " . " +/ + , ? , ^? o g r, « ,. ? , y •„ , r rr LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) . d ? i " "/IM1 PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY i ,' -R "\,, ,, x1 dJ {'•N k' COUNTY HIGHWAY / p 1 L d' 0 STATE HIGHWAY = U.S. HIGHWAY z ' ,• •. Outside City of Clearwater J i Zoning Atlas a<r, _..-. _..-._-_.-._-_•-._-•_-_.- f--'-----------••-- J t 1 ~ ` Apr 07, 2005 L° - erse ?• v s 'j- `w, .J aaeo 1 i ! 7 -__ _ SW 114 0132.28-16 "4 2. m ze,A • r: .I II :x r ; t „ r? ? riI NFW B Y- ? e[a[n Ir ° k 'a tio 1 - ?I rav r « • P v` l • -r+02Ia?d0-grid 446amfi.:Drr' der Site I 005-03 20 ;DQ -Q24 I P t p w-'I ?? I I `« m •? J, wl - esvra J L. `uro• Leva• J w J l gl, GMT rF;r --'_° '>r?.,4?.weTh7nri' « I ! ro _t n' r t ' _ ,/ `T °vlf yr v.•r,tPR I` it ?_=?1F•??-°I-Fi'' area "'I wsa J •`? •? a]ao ?t L J L J . «T ee S I vrt 2RGA a J r vev,s L osow resit I -a z:Clear?rater u PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING / GIS 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 53766 Ph.: (727)662.4760, Fax: (727)526-4765 www.MyC[earwater.com DlevMVror FAi:W Ian deb bl..,aL«tl by b,e Cy&Cteerls W PvbM Vb*sAd•MWFbe•+aNEr,pNaK'N? and mWbeea W ar,d vaedq Md,ear«nl u:dr Ce uHerrertlJ71M! tM aefl remeedrvu mlbcMd.br the cam eC. cWeroa"Ia emoF.r N W?F. FM a - RESDEHTLI=RI S MA -Land-.*R., a.• l WM •law Meeur DVn•N R•va•m el MDR -Y•e«r c•nr`, F•,:«W WoR -Maur lO?drelr/R«Mm•I HON -Ha'^D«•O Ra a•rNl MHP -M•Y« H:a• oat CPN:D]-CC 1wiR:p H•yrown:: Cors•,ark- Wand vH IcNCOD ._• iatM NrlGI•eae,•ea Cen•«+e]arr ti«IaY DLLblu ccM/R LVI'R,Cre WaCUL'JSG 015,RL°rH O.Drt« IRT:W. 1A ft-atl T• '.o T .T:aba Ibvev,i«M c.3urr•-ml ^S'R-Gp•"9aewRVratlmd o. x.TM.T P.Fr«•wMaaaue City Owned Property Agreement to Annex Annexation Deannexation Corredion Rezoning ] SUB NUMBER (' Refer to Plat) - BLOCK NUMBER C% SUB PARCEL NUMBER Cum) PARCEL NUMBER (MBB) LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY COUNTY HIGHWAY STATE HIGHWAY M U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Apr 07, 2005 SW 114 o132.28-16 276A • • (r x r '?"i I G,IINFW, a ec.en 'ti "' der Site I 1 J.1'. I - 0 1_, 005-03 Lr0 J » - F) L D2 i-OZ-021 - OS/ It - I F sr . "00010- r ? ( I F_'r??a r,raeA- J n. i. ro /r '-`4 :.^r .?. KY 1. I.. .._.._ H.-i----r-_/il • , 7 :. n,:.mer »• , l/.r ffl oil J," !i o I e ? ?., '_i- ' •t ? L P P I n / _,F- ' - '' ' z a ! ± 1 i J - _1__w ? ?` `rae J or - r,w• L T_ / ?(J'? lrxr If r,! - ' n `-1--d ? f f ?Gl,rl, 11r1 . Ir• ? » U ' ' ' r i h • I" i ?' ? y I " n ` fr _?'--;. Ji ` 1 ? ?' Py. __ r n4 .?'r'rf ! 1 fLL. -r' -71 .l f'f f.. .. ? •Y" F r?1?Ii LLl: {I 1, T;`_ esero. uur ? P ` L J _ u: I { 1 ?r ?1r.?= El 3 I+ C I a "CI 'e 3 ' G 9 eJ P? , - 113 •n .?;.._`- 3 1 ?I, I l+ w? ,1« C q 1 I ifj ? , r x _ P r- --Are--------- ?"- __ '% J ? ?Iee! L •? „ t rosa4. ,? rra.a J r - 1 I 4 f 1 {z•erea 1 P l; `eP_ ? - TI ./ r'T _ Iron u, Cleamlater U PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING { GIS 100 S. Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph.: (727)882.4750, Fax: (727)526•4760 www.MyClearwatercom D/eebinxr. WEiceYUlnaLblMY It ly9+sMeLY tlra ^JydCrarwYar FvW0CW0ke Ad1fteA!'': hgMa.Erp..rle mrof lH.cc of.d .V -d.Yffb,ea,Yere e1tl14-t trrJe.'a:e!4hQ I4.!M Date !eM:1WQ W.F edle_6aelOr Ra F:raQr. dO.rlrep:.p a oradk Nr2efn 'u Imnmy. Ae e'xA fM Ctyd CJeentxbrPWA/E ^:aY.eam V,ryMhc.sg2aaAa.11rp1ee. ??xTe!ptM aeeu/.er'eary+?.maa.!Mxrrfj. FIgaYZrydMIQ.b Mmy afMro.rCCUarua. F?xln.nnonut?N Cry ddNUaMrPWArE e.p^ey,HyfaoesF MMWIIR fru ure or rnFwe N WF F.. 3:: 0 r00 9 REe OE4TIAL DWRIC'e IMP •M M,euno.n.b reNaYe.l eoR .w.aW. o.r.y Rnere. ,.wxt -IA,bn.ron ?.isry RetlM,l HCR -F p!Drrrb Ra rrnl etHa -Lbgk ?,M, P.?; CPNCDO-C<IXVP1t? R.-I, al:,ylb.n.:! Ca-{.M1rli:• +rer??nbtl Iei1Wp -14Rio ctal.. HMObellieDA Cam.nrm a.I.r o.uw COApSRC0, OIeTRICIS 6PFCLLL Jae OtETR e 0:w. IRT...4A R....iM..,e TW I.4y TTO I. hve C. .?mr,!ml MA: py., eaa„ R.vFaevO O brpt P. F- City Owned Properly Agreement to Annex I.1 Annexation Deannexatlon . Correction Rezoning E.. rte ] SUB NUMBER ('. Refer to Plot) BLOCK NUMBER C+% SUB PARCEL NUMBER C82m? PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) 'r PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY J COUNTYHIGHWAY O STATE HIGHWAY O U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Apr 07, 2005 SW 114 of 32-26-16 276A • • 267A ? ! 1 I ? 1 1 " » I i l n ? LL 0 le ? wo,R , I , .W arwater T L F'' " eS dronad PREPARED - _.__. I I rl . ! 1"!" \i V (L t[?Iw11_L11 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION • nnm I . „ e der Site ENGINEERING I GIS 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33768 _ ; a, j i ? ' Ph.: (727)662-4750, Fax: (727)526-4788 !_ . r ? i , www.MyC[earwatercom _ _h I 005-03020 Q i r? 'n-•"r77_ , 1, 1 ! j j ' _-_'-'. _.-_? .? ?t " !_'_- ???• ? _° ./,` i ' fifDr: hdara,.dndm Nl ilwtl DY d,I Oy DI CYIMatrr WMC Wales Atln+IfCn'Jm'EnyIDM, Ind muMbttt;Yd M i F D 2` 5-02-0-24 1 -t-1-+LL ? `I' g, ` iMfttMD7fM Rtlrrb.•I, x9L?::lu 'rM«d.471M!LM DJb re°e:bd wu ax'bebdrorlb P:++pmJa 01M2'DP"ID qA#C ! /. AJ rxn. rM CRi of pplr'NpbrFWA/E _ _. -^ . F n I J Ir I ',? „< '•,?? • 1--. ?' I?" n? w+ i ? *-+ maY.er nD,wrrlmisa exprnrmd ahgiled.:OnDJnO(Q fA° Iuwley ewry+rgrmac rNJN W arnlM,'q•dMJdw rrlny _ _ n r I 1' a .y_ ew . , "w•"?`? I t .t w t 1 ?7» I 4 I?L' T- r,0d51dd'd 110''•.II - . . . Pnwrw?•Mlrua FWtrwmD,l. do City aJCwaoarorGWA?E esrurrl° rro laexy nnl!aoehreuovafedw/,r.nn w°mn%uwe J i ? I I I m !' r ff'?'?)JeR 1n. M1/ ,. ? ' _ I? I! I I I I % r . " - ` - " N ? , ?7 -:,1 "s" '• is / ; 5 ; 77 i _.... .._ --,J. r-: ?-..-, M:RDer 1 ue, n ./? l w F P.n ... C: D 200 r a . ?? I 1 I'..? I s 51 I - _ 1 I I_ _ w rF-1Of - ? I '- • _ qu,N,lo>,, RE9'DkT'LNL044rRIC"9 i _?-I le I rw 1 " I ! ' F•• ` ?_"_ -_' I I "-'-?-•.-" ? i lOP .lrxG••tty w.tlnetl I.Nx -ta.IMp,nl!DwrJr R«a«na _ }_f i --1`?'rc:-I ! -- `Ir lw~ P A +J P P I .w,au. O.nIy RUCr4 :Yw.a.RlfW? rRwldwM.M a , I _?'-LJ))= _ly'I? ! - ) -'' ! a p ' W CRNSD-?axlme?R:T MgM«ma C°rwrrW:• I I F ____ ! ?'?_ r?? .? _ ?^] ] L- I wni a,nl:l Ia1LW NW%E iu NY A L: ! 'D _ __ .1 I -- 1 n ff ?..?' ? ,• . l • C° °MN"f M O a I --T',? ? _ 1 1 ] , (_°- ? r- -'1 aue• ? "? J ? - 1 w)r1' d it ? " corwv+ae: warwcw 6PEpI1 U86 DiSTF1^a D Rr htl,gA.l b.rrt} •.°r•CrdaOs ? ? 0 I ? _ -• f , / p m• L J / / : T i vYn . Imw,rL;o-W C ' .p•prz •d+l DYR- ?Rwnven•1 D. bw.w..r P. F- 4n• 1eA r I rl T? ?« I« ' rDrr f )T7 ja - ' . • ! I' w ?I f `, Y i! ' u e r,.ae w f " " i " . , = r H _ ? a _ • _ - rr ?,,,-, {•_"-_ a >?^ ? ° _=7 r. yr< PR ". ,T'i]i ^ , .n, e E e r l ,. / « `. %' rig Y J roR ° ?... ` ti 1 City Owned Property Agreement to Annex , « ' p r f; , ._, ` _ ,» * - r ; ' ; , i . ! I f:! •?IC? ?J«'2,1?1? _ -j f ?1?r'° - ` l r v ,. /•/,. ,. ,I ?r._?.i r??a x Annexation Deannexation n _ II kk "? ?? "', ? `- 6 ,`, I ( • . " Jw ? + Correction Rezoning ` ! ?,? t ,,, y _- '' I i • ` ;'?-:% - P SUB NUMBER I'. Reran. Plat) • , ? e , "' I " -` I1r- 11I '? •r • '``J BLOCK NUMBER t G "I w pJ r d AZ `1 r _ :y` l! ? -+F.,?, t1r?s `! S! ! E 1 I ? e J I ? I f ( , ' ,w -_` f_ \t% 6U8 PARCEL NUMBER _.. _.. II I .'., I1- I I i L 1-2 ?_ « - ' r ^ ' : ~ ? '' PARCEL NUMBER (MBS) ? rI « A g] n, ;.? r" „ t. ? , 1 7; D ? yl ? ? I ?r0;/. / ?I t u n' ••• I n I ' t I r I `a _? • 9 I rr ?) o Y w ? _ . , r ro ` ? j ' r, r : r J LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) K' .",r,Dq ? L°Od_ J La9°- J r + ' ' PLATTED SUSDIVISION BOUNDARY { ' ' 1 ?(-.• .. 1 ° COUNTY HIGHWAY r f? x P i r - 1 W STATE HIGHWAY `1m - ? ? U HIGHWAY S O - ,` r . . \} ! ?' ? E f ) s ••. « y : , Outside City of Clearwater ?q` / w ;4 y "Fro // ° ' ' i • r"= J Zoning Atlas v ------------------------- ---- -- t------------------- - WfPa-.•---- ?"? _ ___r j5"rr r- -.. wsDV i Apr 07. 2005 ~ w)ec R ~ ? ,?? ' ` SW 114 of 32-28.18 ? o • ? ?:?,..__ I I ,?' %;.f ? `• , Lsrr. ? ? ? esv - m 276A zean • P ---1-r lei ?? + -. ...J.. t '-T ---4-I - - ?! f u l _ II u l' ~ A' I I i 1 I I i f -.. _. _ _ _ --.. -. _ _ _. _. i rro i f a a,, hEw A + / ` 1.1 A- S, ,L 2 eeA P r - a L L6e01"= J I /? =n ? J ryeae ? I •r Sar,y ,. /?? '?? Liana resae I "Cleamrater L? ®R y MINISTRATION ENGINEERING I GIS 900 S. Myrtle Ave„ Clearwater, FL 95756 Ph.: (727)662-0760, Fax: (727)626.4766 W WW.MYCI"rwaw.com F,53e d'firm,I;?oa-?, :: +;etl:.. 9x O:?•d:Ye ?r ,drS.'r :Y::rs.ia•;„':it:.ati_ •E•;:•x.',.•y x9d!rwMN K•cM.YQ nna aencrma nrc:,t •s,?:+, :rra?:a^ena mr. meanre M!14 Mess zXis^.Y04.rme!.?•axec! I.-C ve ffn r^.'11ven!a'y' aS C<nrdnlM1YaalrPWA) VE .r. ,+^ 7 _N'? lvi'TdM!.vy:y2,M '.MOeiAQCM .sta'KS vY'z4 . ?,rrn. x F:+k'MdtlvFGb holy x?e. a'?i ,aa ?mror':o^+:nrn.. ^,Pt?'tgrlPWAiE 4 R/j 'M > Y.G P. . s?• :Yk./A via OC,IiFJta E Nis WQ J?F f«t III aZ: i:: o ao0 s ILS:DQ.T4g3T31C-3 LOP -LC+Da-a4 M,tl.wtl w?a -as.lagar. oanM'MeaemN aDt .Aran awb R..,«ae AH?It -M,6 rMM dn'rY QxWMN 11Lfl -RT Dereb R,a cerzl AHi -AbON 4a. ?r. Cra,000-CC,xfiv. RcT MN+a«.rK: C>w+n:- IEIICUi •mi.. E=rata NtlatpmlleeG Cee«vMOa aee.y oaNu CCWfrA'.Iti CIr"RIDB 6FEC4"L Va6 g3rRICT3 C-Caa ra-.e LI M„N „tliro<reagr T.TeeYn I-saH,nbid C. An,Fr?al CSR. Om aTwa.Rr>ema C.]a,..rr P.F:,enNrn4M City Owned Property Agreement to Annex Annexation - Deannexation Correction Remning SUB NUMBER (' - Rarer to Plat) B! OCK NUMBER Cij SUB PARCEL NUMBER al--D PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) PLATTED SUBDNISION BOUNDARY _J COUNTY HIGHWAY O STATE HIGHWAY Mn U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Apr 07, 2005 SW 114 of 32.28-16 276A eiver Site \ 005-0A20 -0-42;1 1•?2b05-00010!' . !! «,'- 1 t lit 1 I I I,Niw- _isa' .I,P;,rbNrli)1r 6 ?., «I., «(«+ .I` r -t r r ` (," - n `:! + 1 `aeue_ P Laeaeo. J ae• J E 1 ,',I • ?.,,(. „` --1r??_u 4f '!(?"? `i !'"I!I a ""I.?•. ,•° arr .. ? ."I! PJnF/;, -_ ? I I a Y 6. u• ?. i..4+,;1•!' .1 e ' • auto 1« . , Lweao ? La ? J C P 267A ?f r ? I i 1» ? ?L1 I ? 3DINFW • - I ? fr MR, s, YI , 1 , ? rl I7r'T-• 'arc rl a llr F -? --,T TM/p y^? r ` a1 ie r 010 Z » ?r 91 ! 7, f - i , 7 " " >w ?nltr0 J I O 1 I ' j f -------------------- I , fiver Site \ 2005-03020 ? -0Z 2;1 P -`- -- ? `ur• + 11119' r - 1 x,re• ? J was,: J L + ' I Yr e ? , ,.? ? Ip 11 6 n• eR,3tiT Y;RTaR T f + r r r `aw,l? P `aros• J ?,sn• J n1 ?;;}Y L it 19 -I «?I c C i !f - _ 0.kY61W _ I I, r ? 1 `tires ? ` 1? J r - L 1? a P LPG. , s , a •" )i e 111 a n. Psi F; . ------ ----- -------------------- P - 285A z:Clearwater 1 "fUBCtCV00R $ ISTRATION ENGINEERING I GIS 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 53756 Ph.: (727)6624760, Fax: (727)6264766 www.MyClearwater.com P.ds:.,,'hi, titian dnm 1f!.••ncwvea mr oy °T.^Nanvm. h'S?cW:+>s.ldvYri;y°.,f:'H,•F?MneY,.".q. s:?d rlYaf N.c:epW Fn1:Mnri Aj Mra M0,•:4.^r ur.? •:q tm.!.x'rt:n.'nO mMme tiro m. ,MTtl,tlS aT;a.,:'4+krfM Gatlxc °!dru'eapa?0°grrpl,.t M:fJC'n:?4:r1: tvMMA',' .f,'1^n !a,n Ct.. (: (MffNMM PWA/E ^:°nM1'Tt^frrd.WTf n4 aM: v:.#mm' :0!MM•rYnpfM •n. mtl ?••a."!,N^fv, ?1dM..k+. as'J:n!T'y Ndrir db lYM/ N^0.•oeE?.h•»fY r•?R-ar--.?^i mr n!; ;IperaakT PWA/E r r-^rc+<.'a4'wwla-?;e: n•Me9?a n:d fM Ufevfntme rN W?F Fwt 3:: t.. 0 0.10 i RI:R,Denrur gRTRIC-S UAJR -LC^n IMOm CaT•N Rafdarn,I ?i 1eDR •fraur wraly PU arer '. NNJR -A1a?vr ND,Dm,Oy RnMef•I '. NCR -FC Darfb Raf wryol '. I.HP -MVW Nora Po1 CRNCOJ-DCS1llil R:pa MONru,o:a CaYar^faa:- le'IICOD .blul ?craW Nfk`000,oe0 W?far Jd, CINNIFACIA Dr6TRIC18 RPGax. SfOIRTRY'^e 0.Ortw IRiNdmnat MapN r,O TaCrakOy T.TCUMm I. baktufJe,el C.pa„ara•dal Cb'R. Qw,9ww?Ram,?awl City Owned Property Agreement to Annex Annexation 4 Deannexation Correction - Rezoning C's? ] SUB NUMBER I'' Refer Piet) BLOCK NUMBER <t/ 8US PARCEL NUMBER Csxw j PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY COUNTY HIGHWAY O STATE HIGHWAY U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Apr 07, 2005 SW 114 of 32.28-16 276A 0 • 237A I f +V? fAl-N•W, ' i 1 W ?fClear?vater 5-?t1- Ctrl i? -war er 13113 ?-yrJ?S R STR W ATTON ! --- _+ ! L--.11 F 1 ?;^ r (- ENGINEERING I GIIS ewer Site 100 S. Myrtle Ave„ Clearwater, FL 33766 i' aT « ' "m'' qT e 1 Ph,: (727)562.4760, Fax; (727)526-4766 _. tx Y: .•I, t;, ;. a '" a I www.MyClearwater.corn D 005-03020 ?_.._ , , - gat .?a.:.•.t. :,a:a ! "+ F .. _:"'-' ?r'q- ? ^ / I +'.,S?c wa!s.iwn+:s:+annEr:Fr ='9. a.:immb award _ i _ - - _ I L'` -" {--?.•. e L'''? ' i n'HnMa;.•rxMMnrr:.)7T mtnTY,.yrx.tr+Sx k.!•a,aM .Yf^'?.e',Trmxe Parc 1A-- de t • 03021 .• ?<?,?> I arTe Yi 4C -yATA. WC, l-CAeeM1mbI PWA/E _ n , ? Rv, ,rl arYhe l4 .AM1 Ner.AN^ 0!,penN'ID the 1 •-L fn ?? / ? -- r - 'T "'""m"'"•Y91I"4 ! •YM ,"TM1'4T. W?..1-NMI-r rN x tM dN'p1b;PWA,Ey T<.n,•r 4 wml. s.e. n . Tet nn:Yn;M uma•maum -_ I It 1.21 -5100010; r • ) ,« ?rse?1 n° ., y ri+. '.....r??L? ?? I_,_,i: ? '• i !er.`./ ? ? N T. / r u a, « 9 •, [ ^79 ?^I r„ j,y s W F Fw, I + l._ .a « - I t r• RE9AE1.'TNL d5f4?C-3 I _ n •. ?.__ 3? ?? _ _"-_, , oT• W]R .lew lAMU?'in? yRNdYNtl j -___.__... F?'rF-1 1 '1 "• r 1CIR .M.lr<r MrdS Rn:rtli P _ „ ?, , - = rl` jtI , p NNJR -MMUn Npr D,mM,\Wra,? I1 igwxo-PN,yroa„>:ac°rvnw:•. „ f- • - 1 I r `-° „ ,sss _ - ?l r IENLDp •bMna ? Nea`deAtaee Cenawv,•bn z-- O446' co-l.tA DICRrCTS 6PEG4U66 gpTRloTe r i '?_7y` ?_J „ _ •? 1, u^i :l -.. `aaro 1 L + asoe• a9s: , o.Dnw Ixr-.. L q....rr.,e Twraap. j , P nna• L J L J T.T°ra,m ,. a.,avnbn°i __?r4e' , • '? t ?' ,;, .. / i o.am.rratl osTe. om sw,.'awnm,a r'- _ ?I 1 « _ _- , pih,lr, rLNr „?, I, u r r ; g'c « I « I i ' N City Owned Property -r z-- -------- '?R,3YT W4T.q „ ` "'. ?:• rik',,l" / m . Agreement to Annex "" t• ,b« T i I r-? `- ' Ni ¢" Annexation Deannexatlon Correction Retuning ILa .n"':( ^ Laeur_ p`esarp• J L0°r J 1' C>e,= ] SUB NUMBER I'. Refer la Plat) -1?,: - f r+^ '+ • ' A ' + , I , • J. ) "' , s. '(\?J/ BLOCK NUMBER r" r=?el „p 4 ,° 1• n T.. « ,, :' « ,/ ^?%%n \/ SUB PARCEL NUMBER f - II I „n«y „! a, nr, 1 " '1J-2°iL a t_- . I? Jil_ • / /. d _ a , +-?r? MY61R ", rl w p i _ o `w Cnm j PARCEL NUMBER(M&S) 7 1,j j J? IA°f" 7°1°?°II, 6I ,p• 9 a'1 „!rr n?, „ I „p ' LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) j <w ti J ?• + ?atm ?} `aaen J L01. -U '? PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY j .•« FI "rrrr COUNTY HIGHWAY ° JC p e p' - STATE HIGHWAY j O Me U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater ' C w I• « Ew .u c _ " rea,? ; Zoning Atlas t-------- -------------------- Apr 07. 2005 y a %!T v„„ a'• J arw 1 ! P SW 114 o132.28-16 276A • • I r x I i? 4 ' » 17 '.la N N'u B ? --?- I_ I if ! F,gGT GI Parc LA-B. F k R 5-?rrt?--C?f ?v- - vard:??? eiver Sit 2005-0%20 1 Ci I er s`` r -- " • r-. , r q ?,;'_ ,? tr-- J u ,, I t es9ro L?Ne + r - 1 f_ J `ne• wsss - - t... Lta n F J .J I, Lruea• - n .3 Ill, T? i° 41, 4 0 1 ? w51sR . ? ;, r.-„_'°' _?. K, - - -? ? =? ? ? ,. 6'r .l, , i t....+• -I i ^I^', r=mot' . ???r ? ?_' ii'i' ?,u, '!= ° ? 1:n - . R w ?°? ? ; • , r?= - ? _ NRq - ` it, --I It ?--r r r --r r ? FL" 51 rl Al? IE. I .II .°e ppl I n.i r•d , „a n p n I( ?'', a, _ ?j l_ ?i I?R; ? ?rr??° -'- _ ??-mot -_ _ » it '7 _L,'? ? ? I " r , •, ,fit ¢ ?I cl 7I 4I Y C ? , n 7 r. I ?. l ° 1p , + . ? . ° `aerav J L J L J f Rw ? `Tula J I `? ?' 1, •`?? "'' ?? ? t / C r., 4 f^ .-__-•. _. _ ? m, r K $ • _ r , f `Hera ?r i .:.f 285A r fi-"'= a L roses J r ..? ) ,?? •ee¢re J I v r .1 `raG 1 P 6,Clearwater P RF.A Y `? B 8 ISTRATION ENGINEERING 1 GIS 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph.:(727)562.4760,Fax: (727)626-4766 www.&IyClearwater.com ?,ea:e:'an:,a:an dam+9 ?-.x;,au a. tiro a'ya:w ara. ais;reN':.!'e.itls?ris:w5.:•re?..:,en^y. a^J muJDe ;+rd aMr i:fC_•1 nlC+9 m'r?t.^.r.,;.• ••e ,.rln. XN 'Mp tllMi/ro Oefa MtaR4rt(f ?;9f ,:,vf'MMkkY.Wkr 49 r,', f:'attc n r: 0& a PWAI !N./d¢Hf:cY;.y '.Y L1y el (?eLwebl FWiVE n ' the '.v Wk9 awms9s Rn•[nr. "f;oD' aft. ti arJ'ari L N RriK J?.t% OrIAh'abb¢ny :v»e •('tN we .tt+m. +a ,,•y wdRreerorPW ? mr I vM?n %d•Na uu ar r.t c+'n nvo N W F. ¢RM 3:: 1.: a N8 s REe OQ:TIAL OIeTRICS LOP -L¢w Cwrp RRR rRnra LAiOR •Lew taMm.ORGRT,•RRRCRm RI IM M --Rhe,arMquqO -Y Rre. ho kM DRm4Y R-.1 MP M P -Ma". parrb Fnrrol -¢eee.Mar..- Pa•4 CRNCOO-Ca0.MavRry RRyroa'+xr Cms¢?W.r. n o.mM IENCOD -hhM .tahR p+aroe,nRee:aaw.roa Or«I.y d.larl COfda CIA. 018TRICTS 8PEG USE PETRI= O.M. IRT- W utLl RRRRmA R,tl TRE'rakpY T.T.OM 1-ReRavimW C.rAa¢r- 0 :0"BpR:R+RRaRR O. JR.. - P. PrNRrvReaa4N City Owned Property Agreement to Annex I, Annexation Deannexa0on Correction Rezoning Cra'_ ] SUB NUMBER -Refer to Plat) BLOCK NUMBER C j SUB PARCEL NUMBER Cszm j PARCEL NUMBER (1,10) LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY COUNTY HIGHWAY STATE HIGHWAY M U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas 07, 2005 or 32-28 276A • • .%R Ir Pt, -r,) 7,tj 5 -- 0 -ZP i zClearwater _ GUILINIEW " I I"? ?` - r' O g \, port ?? ,e _---" -- .? I I PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION -------- _ I ENGINEERING/GIS 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 i t P Ph.: (727)5624750, Fax: (727)526-4755 www.MyCleamater.com , v • • P blkkl i . w n ._-...-.._....-.._._ -_ r '> u ama(bn data , N wheel by the City m Clearwater mmla ra o a Ineerlnq. a _ •- r eroasedby the reciplenr wim rm undersrepdbq msl me data mceivetl v2s mllectetl for lM1e purpose oldevabpin e m hk ? s J! I 8 8 p kir we lnvehlory AS SUCK, Ina Clryol Clearwater ! e I ' °' r, . ` ° k. Ro makes no lies ex resssdaXn ied cancemin'he warmn the aaurecy. compleferress, reliability, er sultedli dlhls date lw any C - ? „?, „ o- x ,F i I -!t ° - , x ,• . : r __ _ ? • ? ~ < `??T " > I ( ? `j`' - R -__ l olherpenkuler use. Furthermom, the Gty al eenvelerPWFVE ume no rabniry wh ass s mspaPar asspplalaa »Ym lrre usa ar mwase sum tlare. ? ¢ xr rr ^' P 4 %?- 6 t l N I C I? ? .,z ? ? .. - " ? W?E Fee ix ? F I W I Y tW tOD 0 u i -- x RESIDEM IA LDISTRICTS IMDR Lox MeE Um pm,YlReWarlwl j ''-r"` _ iS( r• I' j P ' F9R Medum Dera;M Re.tlavul _o-dy RU III venal IoR H R P` m wp e s pma - -D- .-IS .?J Ow14Y Cnbn IErvcoO .Iw.ea awls. Na9wanppa caaeen,IOn owns Dal•,n , .t• L a a r 1 9a1 1 r Las • J 2 COMMERCIALDISTRICTS SPECIAL USE DISTRICTS R mwlM Rss«rpn.ra TSpnpao9y L --I L.. J - - I I- T.- f?nmerc. OSrp. open SIR emxreat one D Dwmlwm P A i r . ,. am r.a p q r?^?x a? ? • _ t " j e „ ? ^ , - City Owned Property sw -"- I •" r R "d.r? I o Annex . Agreement I - x i - :f - '' ' r I .. o- Annexation D Deannexation • 4g Correction Rezoning o _ ? r ? -I row' ~ „ ? r -- F _._.- C" SUB NUMBER Pl ' R f I L - _- ( - e er l0 at) --- - .---- - j - m'•' t $ r? rr,; i, z L i i E I t. I 'c ?? i } F - i I - ------- - n O BLOCK NUMBER O SUB PARCEL NUMBER R _ R I ?w s I _ I 9ArsIDE - _ S I ° I I °c I - ?. Sc? r . " . 1 O PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) t ? ;? ,I '1_,I, •4;;5 c f r,7 - ?. " ,s . . ' > -,... LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ' x i COUNTY HIGHWAY < i O STATE HIGHWAY U. S. HIGHWAY 19 rc w Outside City of Clearwater r-?' i Zoning Atlas ------- rwsl r- - -1 j -• ° _? '^ Apr 07, 2005 ? y t > •sa,+ra rows --1 i T ` ? SW 114 o132-2B-16 E o r LA_ 623 -11 ' 276A DD VIEW r s z.Clearwater -- --'- PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ----- _ s Z r ENGINEERING/GIS e 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 i z -- - ? I Ph.: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)526-4755 ----_----- f ` P a r. __ I M r www.MyClearwater.com ? n I w S O + - - - $ r Psts,nf-es, Bala is A-hel by the City d Gealwele, PsIh; WIIe AlmnslkslisWlghee,MO. em muss be sosestel i _ -4 ? "... .__._.__-__ __`• ff {?+ "'7 a + r'---? sadgeany lnema;yie,a l.;u the enemelenniny Mel the Isla rsaerwe sae aalisalee b, mapsrposs afeewcdoy s yrsshc 1 r JE r e _-_ ' LMet. sIhe. cn,rein-y, As such. 1. Cily of Gealwarer P 1.117 k n 4 l N I i S. rr -- L mil, r :a y m . __ '• P?1 ' , a ({ L« ?! ._- `+ -f .? ^ @-t? ?. fir' u a + + I i + e n r I ' I v I • / I ^ x rre q o werren ee, eAPrege ar n N R.Nfiry W Ih; lhis s sea y e°cvr n otlle, parlrwlahc Iar me. . FurtM1emore, the OR, F.4hee.., 'he OR, If firy Geenvafer PWA PWAVE r ofsuM ears no f.Wiry whemoew , eseadshed Mlh the use or misuse . - _.-- ^ 12 ?n n -.. f.: r ul r. n ! TpAO ST, «• / a v • = 'q I Y u e rr n v i ., n I n, » t I I "l F N E 2. IW 0 300 a+ rn ,J b ., I u • + + I I 5 ea + r I _ rb .-..-..-..._._.-.-.-. $ a n ar I 1 3 ----- - ra J 3 R SIDENiIAL DSTRILTS lOR -LOW OamAy Rn' _ I I unDR ?Mea NnD 'yRa 'a i AO f I i I I?waR Wade naryR ser a 'a s ' f? _J 1 CRNDOO CoecNnan RMS NegAE°rh°°S CUrsmatcn ? ' I i -_ Sl ? X 7? ?? 1 1 Y L a r- f ! » t- - 1 `PCI+e• + a r j r I IENCOD 4 4 M EsNrOroaMOU LOrunvalon oS an COMMERCIAL DISTRICTRICTS SPEpnl lISE DISTRICTS N t_ J `aa -f Lau I O glic+ IRL INUahu RaiNKllaM iaMndegy c iT- I RlnMwr. D 'XI I P -A s I. l.. t lP.3s ., „j, r '? + ! '- '} a, •S g SR w.Ten x "' I- 1 » , jN - 1? : x g I «. I<, Id a k r/ . °°`••« City Owned Property . Agreement to Annex » ^ Em .,, ? Annexation D Deannexation Correction o Rezoning a Lisr J a. - I -' r?'+ cA+ mr J ` aa+• J +a ? ` 4.„ • 113 SUB NUMBER Refer to Plal ' ? 1 ; 4 '"- ,»- ? ?} ?tta?>.. '•' ---- --------- + " r :+ n ? . a re r+ + ? BLOCK NUMBER O 6 ' _ - L; Ju E g P a k ' *'+ +' i ° O SUB PARCEL NUMBER n I rsti _ eAYSIDE " ? ^ eN « I S°r u r- sxmz PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) n. f. ` LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP, I 1 ? E A 1 s M1I wnee L - J PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ,lq ^ ?• i a ? j j., d? F? r.g 7 `? F Y??? 6 Y a a tQ COUNTYHIGHWAY i f p ,?u 1 O STATE HIGHWAY i -, U.S. HIGHWAY e e Outside City of Clearwater i ? D4 i rte- 1 Zonin Atlas 4 d E L g -°---- --------°-°--'-°---°-°------ ----- ---- -- r -r 6 r te _ Apr 07, 2005 - d ;- Q? k - reels r+? 1 i w.? L T SW 114 of 32-28-16 k 1 - Y o a ,? A^ °I - - n 276A ti -: J 4 LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC PROPERTY FACTS AND ISSUES March 21, 2007 MARBELLA PROJECT - 325 S. Gulfview Boulevard (including 326, 345, 347 and 353 Coronado Drive and 346 and 350 Hamden Drive) % Under Case Nos. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005-03020/PLT2005-00010, the project was classified into three "Parcels" (Parcels A, B and Q. Parcel A included those properties between Coronado Drive and South Gulfview Boulevard (326 Coronado Drive and 325 S. Gulfview Blvd.). Parcel B included those properties between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive (345 Coronado Drive, 347 - 353 Coronado Drive, 346 Hamden Drive and 350 Hamden Drive). Parcel C includes the small waterfront lots east of Hamden Drive associated with Parcel B lots and contain docks for the upland motels. The total project area under the Marbella project is 2.37 acres. ¦ The application approved by the CDB under Case Nos. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005-00010 included a Termination of Status of Nonconformity (Termination) for density. There exists on Parcels A and B the equivalent of 119 overnight accommodation units, where only 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted at the then current maximum density of 40 units/rooms per acre. The application approved by the CDB under Case Nos. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005-00010 included the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) of 18 overnight accommodation units from 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive. These 18 overnight accommodation units, based on 40 overnight accommodation units/rooms per acre, also represented the maximum number of units (18) that could be transferred to the receiving site under the provisions of Section 4-1402 (20% of 93 units = 18 units). The overall Marbella project included the 119 overnight accommodation units approved under the Termination regulations and the 18 overnight accommodation units approved under the TDR for a total of 137 overnight accommodation units. The Marbella project utilized the conversion of 137 overnight accommodation units to 102 dwelling units using the 40/30 conversion rule (multiply 137 overnight accommodation units by 0.75 = 102 dwelling units). The Marbella project approved by the CDB consisted of 92 units on Parcel A and 10 units on Parcel B. The Marbella project is still a valid Flexible Development (FLD) project, as a Time Extension was approved requiring the submission of a building permit to January 19, 2008. A request for a maximum of one-year time extension may still be requested by the applicant, but must be approved by the CDB prior to the expiration date of January 19, 2008. A ¦ The applicant has submitted a Minor Revision request for the Marbella project to relocate the 10 units on Parcel B to Parcel A, so that all 102 units will be on Parcel A. The Minor Revision is under staff review at this time. Based on Minor Revision plans submitted for the Marbella project (under review), all 102 dwelling units are located on Parcel A, but with only 189 parking spaces meeting Code requirements. The Marbella project approved by the CDB included a total of 239 parking spaces, at a ratio of 2.34 spaces per unit. At the current Code minimum requirement of two parking spaces per unit, a total of 204 spaces are required to be provided. With only 189 spaces that meet Code requirements provided on Parcel A, there are at least 15 spaces required on Parcel B for the Marbella project. The approval of the Marbella project stands on its own at this time, having used the density, Termination and conversion rules in effect at the time of approval. The Termination rules have now been amended by City Council disallowing the conversion to a different use. While the City regulations have been changed to permit 50 overnight accommodation units per acre in the Tourist District, the Marbella project cannot avail itself of this increase in allowable density, due to City Council amending the Termination rules to disallow the conversion to a different use. Likewise, the developer cannot avail himself to the proposed Countywide rules allowing 125 overnight accommodation units per acre (minimum of three acres required), because the City Council amended the Termination rules to disallow the conversion to a different use, UNLESS the developer desires to abandon the current Marbella project in lieu of developing overnight accommodation units over the entire property (Marbella property and the Other Lucca Development, LLC Property listed below). OTHER LUCCA DEVELOPMENT, LLC PROPERTY 401 Coronado Drive - This site is a sending site for the TDR portion of the Marbella project. This site was previously developed with a restaurant and retail sales. An OCL request in 2004/2005 for a five-unit motel was denied by Planning, as it represented a change in use requiring either an FLS or FLD approval. An OCL request for an eight-unit motel is currently pending. 406 Hamden Drive - This site is a sending site for the TDR portion of the Marbella project. An OCL has been issued for an 18-unit motel. Based on visual inspection, staff can only verify 15 units. The status of this issued OCL needs to be reviewed (may need to be revoked). 405 Coronado Drive - Presently developed with the Key Lime Inn. An occupational license (OCL) is pending at this time for eight units, but based on visual inspection, staff can only verify seven units. 415 Coronado Drive - Presently developed with the Falcon Motel. An OCL is pending at this time for 22 units (verified based on visual inspection). 419 Coronado Drive - Presently developed with the Gulf Beach Motel. A prior OCL listed this motel as 17 units. An OCL has been issued for a 20-unit motel. Based on visual inspection, staff can only verify 16 units. The status of this issued OCL needs to be reviewed (may need to be revoked). OTHER ISSUES The applicant has provided information that the property Lucca Development,LLC owns beyond the Marbella project is 1.31 acres in size. This involves the property at 401 Coronado Drive, 405 Coronado Drive, 415 Coronado Drive, 419 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive. Based on 50 overnight accommodation units per acre, these 1.31 acres could be redeveloped with 65 overnight accommodation units, HOWEVER, this number must be reduced by the 18 units transferred from 401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive to the Marbella project, leaving a maximum of 47 units to be developed on the 1.31 acres. The TDR sending site (401 Coronado Drive and 406 Hamden Drive) can derive the benefit of the increased density of 50 overnight accommodation units toward the redevelopment of the 1.31 acre property owned by Lucca Development, LLC south of 5 h Street. Should the applicant abandon the approved Marbella project in lieu of developing overnight accommodation units over the entire property (Marbella property and the Other Lucca Development, LLC Property listed above), the entire property owned by Lucca Development, LLC totals 3.68 acres. At 125 overnight accommodation units per acre under the proposed Countywide rules, a total of 460 overnight accommodation units could be developed on the overall Lucca Development, LLC property. LL Development & Neighborhood Services Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 210 >_ e arwa ter Clearwater, FL 33756 C Telephone: (727) 562-4567 Fax: (727) 562-4576 www.myclearwater.com APPLICATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE / BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT* Application Must Be Submitted in Person [Do Not Mail] Business Name: Fictitious Name Cert # Physical Business Address (not a PO Box): _. city re- Business Phone: (77 216 Business Fax Suite # X376 ?- Zip Code BUSINESS OWNER INFORMATION Owner / Qualifier Name: , 0 0 -,:-- / /e- 'ri0/ 'S--t ?qw z L C_ Date of Birth: Owner Home Phone: L7 7 y o 2 de Business Mailing Address (if different than above): 2 r?'? G.G i it / D C L?rs`.?y5'?' •Cc_ 33 7 C City State Zip Code E-Mail Address: k l4s e Gi1CZ40.?c. DATE OF BUSINESS OPENING Description of Business: fY)(?Q_ t Ownership -Please check one, Individual _ Partnership Corporation -corporation # I certify that the information given in this application is complete and accurate, and I u dr nd that to make false or fraudulent statements within this application may result in denial of occupational license and possible legal action.. If granted a license, I agree to operate within the city and state laws, and to notify the City of Clearwater, Licensing division if any of the information I have given changes. I also certify that I am the bush wner or owner's legal agent. ,r_? r-,-\ n /7 Print Name ouonvwo i mA mm oci - i Hs per staie statutes -ttrective January 1, 2007 r, FOR CITY USE ONLY- Department Approval Date Staff,lnitials Cate o .# Fed-Amount ning a Chi a Traffic Ena ?r L? JCS Cr ' Building ' Police Fire DBPR/PCCLB (? . fictltiWs Name OTHER; ??, ?. . (if you are using a s o er than u r first / last name) OCL# iv i fill/ Development & Neighborhood Services Department 0 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 210 Clearwater Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: (727) 562-4567 Fax: (727) 562-4576 0 www.myclearwater.com APPLICATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE / BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT* MEN= WISIM 111 11 1 1 11 Application Must Be Submitted in Person [Do Not Mail] ?o ESS INFORMATION Business Name: Fictitious Name Cert # (if you are using a business name other than your first / last name) Physical Business Address (not a PO Box): Coe-0W - Suite # CZ. e "-i G4/1 S-7767 City State Zip Code Business Phone: Qq Z6 7 -: Business Fax BUSINESS OWNER INFORMATION D Owner / Qualifier Name: / 6FTh` ?'+ v?r} o Owner Home Phone: (??) 7 df-r- O2 y-' Business Mailing Address (if different than above): 3 Z :?- J- 67" v 4'f, / C- ") Suite/APT # City G Alyde,TX' L- 3 State E-Mail Address: !--U k4 & Gt/GC,q ANC.. CvA-% Description of Business: DATE OF BUSINESS OPENING 0aa i?(-j l1 p Code Ownership -P/ease check one, Individual _ Partnership- Corporation. Corporation # I certify that the information given in this application is complete and accurate, and I understand that tom Pals or fraudulent statements within this application may result in denial of occupational license and possible legal action. If granted a e i thin the Ll- city and state laws, and to notify the City of Clearwater, Licensing division if any of the information I hav iven an o ify that I am the bus' ess owner or owner's legal agent. . / Print Name NESS TAX RECEIPT-As ner State StatiAp-q -Fffprtiva .Inns mrv 1 7nn7 Date FOR CITY USE ONLY: De eM roval Date Staff ttials. :, Cob # Fee Amount 777, 5 c n'9 `?` ?1 d v' ..- f- Bu Police Fire _ PR/PCCL B_ j 5-7- JA C., Fi tious Name OCL# ?C C c f FEB 12 2007 ?nID DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT CITY OF CLEARWATER D I ment Neighborhood Services Department o?(]? 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 210 LL LE 0,3 >a Clearwater, FL 33756 eph ne: (727) 562-4567 Fax: (727) 562-4576 VELOPMENT SERVICE DEPT c1 CITY TY OF O? C LEAAWATER www.myclearwater.com APPLICATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE / BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT* 111111111 111 11111, 1 glip;1111111111111 Application Must Be Submitted in Person [Do Not Mail] 8 BUSINESS INFORMATION Business Name: i/? _ (Il•W-577 C-- Fictitious Name Cert # (If you are using a business name than yoHt first / last name) Physical Business Address (not a PO Box): __ ??? ??i?.9il Suite # C b15F4 2 Xe 3 3,7g 7 City State Zip Code Business Phone: OF l 7C? J Business Fax (_) BUSINESS OWNER INFORMATION Owner / Qualifier Name: ?/ `r;4 J-D-Vr G lie- Date of Birth: Owner Home Phone: (7!f) 78 -S' d Z 4-i Business Mailing Address (if different than above): 3 ? 6au,0/tc- W) Suite/APT # State E-Mail Address: Description of Business: C-PAIDATE OF BUSINESS OPENING Code Ownership -Please check one, Individual _ Partnership- Corporation- Corporation # I certify that the information given in this application is complete and accurate, and I understand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this application may result in denial of occupational license and possible legal action. If granted a license, I agree to operate within the city and state laws, and to notify the City of Clearwater, Licensing division if any of the information I have given changes. I also certify that I am the business owner or owner's legal agent. SignalitFe & Title . // Print Name Date *BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT As per State Statutes -Effective January 1, 2007 IS 1111111; 1 FOR CITY USE ONLY- Department Approval Date - Staff Initials- Category # Fee Amount nin 1000 -6Mc -qn-q Police ' Fire BPR/PCCL > t, : F tious Name OTH r ?r 4 I,f ?t?+la? tt1:k3 r? i?(?tt PP,? OCL# <'a ?` LL Development & Neighborhood Services Department 0 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 210 ' Clearwater Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: (727) 562-4567 Fax: (727) 562-4576 0 www.myclearwater.com APPLICATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE / BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT* END-NORM Application Must Be Submitted in Person [Do Not Mail] b 0 Business Name: Fictitious Name Cert # !4 PY (If you are using a business name other than your first / last name) Physical Business Address (not a PO Box): 61PGO A14 0-b-0 Suite # cfJAC-st.C??ACkZ 45 --?f ?L- -7.7 7 r- 2 City State Zip Code Business Phone: LZf -5- ?/ - 7 lp 2 S Business Fax BUSINESS OWNER INFORMATION Owner / Qualifier Name: Gt r-C-tw 0 cJ?"l?i?, fiGG Date of Birth: Owner Home Phone: c7 _ -7 9% flat ?o .?C 3 Z? Business Mailing Address (if different than above) city E-Mail Address: ZV A5?E 6&&4G :.q 1,?C- , C--V-1 DATE OF BUSINESS OPENING Description of Business: Ownership -Please check one, Individual _ Partnership- Corporation- Corporation # L? \uJ U U 1 certify that the information given in this application is complete and accurate, and I understand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this application may result in denial of occupational license and possible legal action. If granted a license, I agree to operate within the city and state laws, and to notify the City of Clearwater, Licensing division if any of the information I have given changes. I also certify that I am the bum owner or owner's legal agent. Title _ /r Print Name Date ?RUSINESS TAX RECEIPT As pF State Statutes -Effective January 1, 2007 FOR CITY USE ONLY. Department Approval N ` Staff Initials Ca., o # Fee Amount 3 C' -t , ci.G 3. `01 c' g 3 7? ce Fire PR/PCCL ? .;Elctit9ou ame THER ` , C ` 0 i I I U f z? C-1 l e-- ?• Suite/APT # INFORMATION ?de . FEB 12 2007 DEVELOPMENT SERV ECEC SI OEPT CITY OF CLEARWATER LL Development & Neighborhood Services Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 210 > earwater Clearwater, FL 33756 O Cl Telephone: (727) 562-4567 Fax: (727) 562-4576 www.myclearwater.com APPLICATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE / BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT* mmmmmmm= masons= Application Must Be Submitted in Person [Do Not Mail] Business Name: Fictitious Name Cert # ^,'' ?2LM (If you are using a business name other than your first / last name) Physical Business Address (not a PO Box): 1?S O Suite # CIA 6012 w.?T?2 ??tf 3 3 7 G7 City State Zip Code Business Phone: -S/C /- l-2 C"E S- Business Fax ( ) BUSINESS OWNER INFORMATION Owner/ Qualifier Name: e - Date of Birth: Owner Home Phone: (7 2, ?0 3G i Business Mailing Address (if different than above): 3 2- S GvLF /j:!5? 4) Suite/APT # City If37a 000z--C- Zip Code E-Mail Address: z q A*,-- @ ?t/c?4/?? • Cow DATE OF BUSINESS OPENIN Description of Business: Ownership -Please check one, Individual _ Partnership- Corporation- Corporation # I certify that the information given in this application is complete and accurate, and I understand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this application may result in denial of occupational license and possible legal action. If granted a license, I agree to operate within the city and state laws, and to notify the City of Clearwater, Licensing division if any of the information I have given changes. I also certify that I am the business owner or owner's legal agent. ? 5O ?CVA,J14 & Title Print Name Date *BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT As per State Statutes -Effective January 1, 2007 FOR CITY USE ONLY. De" rtment Approval Date - Staff Ittitiais Cate # Fee Amount ? 0z' y 10,2 J c'.c IL (11 ?C Traffic Eng Building Police Fire. - -_ j i DBPR/PCCL, F _tious Name OTHER <;({ U. - conj AiaT OCL# $V"r ?'3 ? - FE 0 9 2007 a3F I 1 %;iyra? + ° :.P,/ICFs DEPT CITY O \6' ? P*AiAT P CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, June 21, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont from 05-17-05) Skiff Point of Clearwater, LLC is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 15 attached dwelling units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft to building and from 25 ft to 3 ft to pavement; a reduction to the side (north and south) setbacks from 10 ft to 6.5 ft to building and 5 ft to parking; a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 5 ft to pool and 7.5 ft to parking; and an increase in height from 30 ft to 49 ft to roof deck and additional 4 ft for parapet (from roof deck to top of parapet) and an additional 16 ft for elevator overrun (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, in the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD)/Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District under the provisions of Sec. 2-404.F and 2-1602. C and H. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (15 dwelling units) at '100 and 201 Skiff Point; Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5-A, Lots 35 & 36. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner. FLD2005-01012 2. Brightwater Cove, LLC is requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 9 attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 803.C, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case No. FLD2003-02007 [which permitted attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east and west) setbacks from 10 ft to 7 ft and 6 ft, respectively, (to building), reduction in the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and 13 ft (to pool) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.C]); and (2) Preliminary Plat for the replatting of 9 townhome lots. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (9 townhomes)] at 130 Brightwater Dr, Brightwater Cove No. 2, Lot 1. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-02007A/PLT2005-00013 3. Del Mar Development, LLC (Rob Szasz) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 322.5 sq-ft addition to a previously approved 497 sq-ft multi-use dock for a total of 14 slips (10 existing; 4 proposed), under the provisions of Sec. 3-601. (Proposed Use: Dock addition to a condominium project) at 1860 N Ft Harrison Ave, Villa Del Mar of Clearwater Condo Unit 106. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-03025 4. Clearwater Retail Partners, LLC is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction to the front (west along US Highway 19 N) setback from 25 ft to 17.17 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5.59 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 9.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.21 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pavement), increases to building height of an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck - roof deck at 18.67-ft height) and an additional 13.83 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street (US Highway 19 N), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C; and a reduction to the interior landscaping requirement from 10 percent to 6.8 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (7,350 sq ft) at 18419 US Hwy 19 N, Sec. 20-29-16, M&B 33.04. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner Ill. FLD2005-02017 5. Adelheid Hanghofer & Ocean Breeze, LLC are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District and the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to lot area in the MHDR District from 15,000 sq ft to 8,700 sq ft and in the T District from 10,000 sq ft to 8,700 sq ft, a reduction to lot width in the MHDR District from 150 ft to 100 ft, reductions to the front (north along Somerset Street) in the MHDR District from 25 ft to 13.67 ft (to building) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area) and in the T District from 15 ft to 13.67 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) in the T District from 15 ft to 10 ft (to building), an increase to building height in the MHDR District from 30 ft and in the T District from 35 ft to 50.25 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 5.25 ft (from roof deck) and rooftop, open pavilions of 11.75 ft (from roof deck) and to allow a building within the required sight visibility triangles, as a Residential Infill Project in the MHDR District, under the provisions of Sec. 2-404.F and 2-803.B; (2) Reduction to the landscape buffer along Somerset St from 10 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-01016) of 2 dwelling units to this site from 200 Brightwater Dr, under the provisions of Sec. 4-1402. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (14 condominiums)] at 19 & 21 Somerset St, Clearwater Beach Rev Blk 2, lots 6-9. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-01006/TDR2005-01016 6. Warner Hospitality, Scott A Warner, & Patricia A Kellan (Newkirk Ventures, Inc.) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (16 existing attached dwelling units; 16 attached dwelling units proposed), under the provisions of Sec. 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 9 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7.8 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.5 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 5.3 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to building and pavement) and an increase to building height from 35 ft to 87.3 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 5.67 ft (from roof deck), under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.B. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (16 condominiums)] at 706 Bayway Blvd, Bel Crest Condo Units 1 & 17. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-03031 7. Clara & Dorothy Boldog, Americana Gulf Motels, Ltd, Ptr, Lucca Development, LLC, Thomas J & Stasia Wilk, & US-Euro-Trade, Inc. are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist District (Parcels A and B) and an increase in height from 30 ft to 148 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel A), an increase in the height of a parapet wall from 30 inches (2.5 ft) to 7 ft (Parcel B), permit a building within the required sight visibility triangles along Coronado Drive and 5th Street and an increase in height from 30 ft to 64 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel B) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.C., a Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and 3 dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist District under the provisions of Sec. 6-109.C (Parcels A, B and C), Preliminary Plat and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 325 South Gulfview Blvd (receiver site - Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sec. 4- 1402 and 4-1403. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (102 units)] at 325 S Gulfview Blvd, 326, 345, 347 & 353 Coronado Dr, & 346 Hamden Dr, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub, Lots 63-66, & 112-117, Columbia Sub No 2 Blk A, Lots 12-14, & Collumbia Sub No 3 Lots 8, 9 & 9A. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005- 03020/PLT2005-00010 8. Harold Barian (Dave Smart) are requesting Flexible Development approval to reduce the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 17 ft (to pavement), under the provisions of Sec. 2-404, to reduce the front (north) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 7 ft and reduce the front (west) landscape buffer from 10 ft to 5 ft as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provision of Sec. 3-1202.G. and a Preliminary Plat. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (10 townhome units)] at 1413 Sunset Pt Rd & 1871 Kings Hwy, Brentwood Estates Lots B & C. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner. FLD2005-03026/PLT2005-00009 9. Beach & Gulf Sands, Inc., & North Clearwater Beach Development (Anthony Menna) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings in the Tourist District and an increase in height from 35 ft to 64 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the height of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches, permit 2 parking spaces within the required sight visibility triangles along Bay Esplanade, a reduction in the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and 3 ft (to trash staging area), reduction in the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), 10 ft (to pool) and 7 ft (to building), reduction in the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area) and a reduction the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 8 ft (to pool) and 10 ft (to building), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.C., Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03019) of 2 dwelling units from 116 Brightwater Dr (donor site) to 657 Bay Esplanade (receiver site) under the provisions of Sec. 4-1402 and 4-1403 and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity under the provisions of Sec. 6-109. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (13 condominium units)] at 657 & 663 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner. FLD2005-03032/TDR2005-03019 10. Beckett Lake Lodge is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the transfer of 1 dwelling unit (TDR2005-04021) from the portion of the subject site within the Preservation (P) district and Preservation (P) future land use plan (FLUP) category to a portion of the site within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) district and Residential Low Medium (RLM) FLUP category under the provisions of Sec. 4-1402 - 1403 and to allow an assisted living facility on the site located at 2271 Montclair Rd as a Residential Infill Project without fronting on a major arterial street approved by the Community Development Board on March 21, 2000) by expanding the number of beds from 144 beds to 180 beds, reduce the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft, not providing a landscaped wall or fence which will screen parking from adjacent parcels of land as required by Sec. 3-304.A.2 and a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 90 spaces (1 space per 2 residents) to 72 spaces (1 space per 2.5 residents), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-304.G.. (Proposed Use: 180-bed Assisted Living Facility) at 2155 Montclair Rd, Sec. 01-29-15, M&B 14.01. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner FLD2005-03030 11. Boos Development Group, Inc (Boos Florida Development, LLC, Robert B Boos) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a fence\wall 6 ft in height within the front (north and south) setbacks along East Palmetto and Marilyn Streets, respectively on a property within the Medium High Density Residential District (MHDR) (pending case ANX2005-03009), under the provisions of Sec. 3-804.A.1. (Proposed Use: 144 attached dwellings) at 2077 E Palmetto St & 2093 Palmetto St, Pinellas Groves SE '/4, Lots 3-4, 12-14, & Part of Lot 5. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner FLD2005-03028 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 06/05/05 r (,1--) ?j?7D?l 7-14 c??D? ? 0 0 M A M P BELLINO INC AMERICANA GULF MOTELS LTD PTR BASKIN, H H EST 12016 WADSWORTH DR 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD OWENS, W D EST TAMPA FL 33626 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 516 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905 BAY LAWN 406 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 BELLE AQUA VILLAS LLC PO BOX 4189 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189 BOLDOG, CLARA BOLDOG, DOROTHY 2500 VIRGINIA AVE NW UNIT 1405 WASHINGTON DC 20037 - 1901 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE 6033 CRIMSON CT MCLEAN VA 22101 - 1818 BRIGHTWATER COVE LLC 701 SPOTTIS WOODE LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5267 CANNEY, SCOTT W 314 WESTERN AVE ALLEGAN MI 49010 - 1241 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE M & J TRUST PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 BUKOWSKI, WLADYSLAW BUKOWSKI, KRYSTYNA 345 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2450 CANTERBURY OAKS INC 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 BOLDOG, DOROTHY PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 C B C I DEV GROUP LLC 475 CENTRAL AVE STE M8 ST PETERSBURG FL 33701 - CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT T L S HOLDINGS INC 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CHRISTMAN, KENNETH R SR CLEARWATER BEACH ASSOCIATION CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS CHRISTMAN, LINDA J JAY KEYES COALITION 225 CORONADO DR 100 DEVON DRIVE DOUG WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33761 CLEARWATER SEASHELL RESORT CZAICKI, EDWARD D'AMICO LOUIS J 28059 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CZAICKI, BOZENA , 410 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 332 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 CLEARWATR BEACH FL 33767 - 2448 DI VELLO LAND TRUST FIFTH SOUTH LLC GIADLA, WERONIKA DI VELLO, FULVIO THE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1006 GIADLA, ALOJZY 400 ISLAND WAY # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 355 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 GIBSON, EMMETT GIBSON, EVELYN L 2309 BRISTOL ST BRYAN TX 77802 - GIOVANNI, ROBERT KOZIK, CHRISTIAN 852 NARCISSUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1131 HIGHLANDER ROCK INC 415 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2537 J M B& A DEVELOPERS LLC J Z M C CORP K& P CLEARWATER ESTATE LLC 1947 PETERS PL 415 CORONADO DR 3105 W WATERS AVE STE 31 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 TAMPA FL 33614 - KALLAS, DORA KEITH ZAYAC KENIG, EDWARD KALLAS, GEORGE KEITH ZAYAC AND ASSOCIATES KENIG, STANISLAWA 3405 GULF BLVD 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD 433 CORONADO DR BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3644 SUITE 40 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 L O M INC LITTLE, DAVID R LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 4100 N 28TH TERR 1734 CASEY JONES CT 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 HOLLYWOOD FL 33020 - 1116 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1701 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MALKE, ROBERT E MARKS, IRWIN J MALKE, TERESA L MARKS, DAWN D MAZZON, MAURIZIO PO BOX 2124 115 BRIGHTWATER DR 110 BAYSIDE DR LARGO FL 33779 - 2124 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MC INERNEY, STEVEN J MORGAN GEORGE W PALMTOPPER CONDO ASSN INC MC INERNEY, BARBARA L , 122 BAYSIDE DR 110 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 105 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE R T V PROPERTIES INC ROGERS, ROLAND 419 EASTSHORE DR PO BOX 3835 321 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8835 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SAUNDERS, WILLIAM SEACOVE PTNSHP SHAH, JUGALKISHOR B SAUNDERS, SHIRLEY 316 HAMDEN DR SHAH, MANNA J 333 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 326 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2449 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 RICHARD A SIMON SOFRONAS, JAMES SUN WEST PALMS DEV LLC , 1474 S PAIRIE AVE #D SOFRONAS, CHRISTINE 409 HAMDEN DR S CHICAGO IL 60608 - 2208 431 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 SUNRISE ON THE BEACH INC SYKES, WILLIAM E SZLECHTA, WLODZIMIERZ 229 CORONADO DR SYKES, HELEN N KUNOWSKA, EWA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 421 HAMDEN DR 333 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2537 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 TAS, JERRY TAS, TERESA TIDSWELL INC TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST 342 HAMDEN DR 419 CORONADO DR 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST US-EURO-TRADE INC VASILAROS, JACK 163 BAYWAY DR 346 HAMDEN DR VASILAROS, SOPHIA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 119 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 VASILAROS, SOPHIA 111 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WILK, THOMAS J WILK, STASIA 451 HARBOR DR S INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 3118 0 Is VASILAROS, SOPHIA VASILAROS, JACK 111 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 ZIMMERMANN, GUNDER 12912 CASTLEMAINE DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 4470 WAZIO, EUGENIUSZ F WAZIO, IRENA 110 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 OD2005-02021. (68) A M P 8ELLINO INC 12016 WADSWORTH DR TAMPA FL 33626 - BAY LAWN 406 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE 6033 CRIMSON CT MCLEAN VA 22101 - 1818 BRIGHTWATER COVE LLC 701 SPOTTIS WOODE LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5267 CANNEY, SCOTT W 314 WESTERN AVE ALLEGAN MI 49010 - 1241 CHRISTMAN, KENNETH R SR CHRISTMAN, LINDA J 225 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 AMERICANA GULF MOTELS LTD PTR BASKIN, H H EST 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD OWENS, W D EST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 516 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905 BELLE AQUA VILLAS LLC PO BOX 4189 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE M & J TRUST PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 BUKOWSKI, WLADYSLAW BUKOWSKI, KRYSTYNA 345 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2450 CANTERBURY OAKS INC 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 Clearwater Beach Association (Jay Keyes, 100 Devon Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767 BOLDOG,CLARA BOLDOG, DOROTHY 2500 VIRGINIA AVE NW UNIT 1405 WASHINGTON DC 20037 - 1901 BOLDOG, DOROTHY PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 C B C I DEV GROUP LLC 475 CENTRAL AVE STE M8 ST PETERSBURG FL 33701 - CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT T L S HOLDINGS INC 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Williams, President, 2544 Frisco Drive, Clearwater, FL 33761 CLEARWATER SEASHELL RESORT CZAICKI, EDWARD D'AMICO LOUIS J 28059 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CZAICKI, BOZENA , 410 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 332 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 CLEARWATR BEACH FL 33767 - 2448 DI VELLO LAND TRUST FIFTH SOUTH LLC GIADLA, WERONIKA DI VELLO, FULVIO THE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1006 GIADLA, ALOJZY 400 ISLAND WAY # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 355 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 GIBSON, EMMETT GIBSON, EVELYN L 2309 BRISTOL ST BRYAN TX 77802 - GIOVANNI, ROBERT KOZIK, CHRISTIAN 852 NARCISSUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1131 HIGHLANDER ROCK INC 415 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2537 J M B& A DEVELOPERS LLC J Z M C CORP K& P CLEARWATER ESTATE LLC 1947 PETERS PL 415 CORONADO DR 3105 W WATERS AVE STE 31 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 TAMPA FL 33614 - KALLAS, DORA KALLAS, GEORGE 3405 GULF BLVD BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3644 L O M INC 4100 N 28TH TERR HOLLYWOOD FL 33020 - 1116 Lucca Development, LLC 9011 S Natoma Ave Oak Lawn, IL 60453 MARKS, IRWIN J MARKS, DAWN D 115 BRIGHTWATER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 MORGAN, GEORGE W 122 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 R T V PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 3835 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8835 SEACOVE PTNSHP 316 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 SOFRONAS, JAMES SOFRONAS, CHRISTINE 431 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 SYKES, WILLIAM E SYKES, HELEN N 421 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2537 Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates (701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 LITTLE, DAVID R 1734 CASEY JONES CT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1701 M S P A ACQUISITION II 1585 BROADWAY 37TH FLR NEW YORK NY 10036 - 8200 MAZZON, MAURIZIO 110 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - PALMTOPPER CONDO ASSN INC 110 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 ROGERS, ROLAND 321 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SHAH, JUGALKISHOR B SHAH, MANNA J 326 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 SUN WEST PALMS DEV LLC 409 HAMDEN DR S CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SZLECHTA, WLODZIMIERZ KUNOWSKA, EWA 333 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 KENIG, EDWARD KENIG, STANISLAWA 433 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MALKE, ROBERT E MALKE, TERESA L PO BOX 2124 LARGO FL 33779 - 2124 MC INERNEY, STEVEN J MC INERNEY, BARBARA L 105 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 EASTSHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 SAUNDERS, WILLIAM SAUNDERS, SHIRLEY 333 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2449 SIMON, RICHARD A 1474 S PAIRIE AVE #D CHICAGO IL 60608 - 2208 SUNRISE ON THE BEACH INC 229 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 TAS, JERRY TAS,TERESA 342 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 TIDSWELL INC TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST US-EURO-TRADE INC 419 CORONADO DR 163 BAYSIDE DR 346 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 0 • VASILAROS, JACK VASILAROS, SOPHIA WAZIO, EUGENIUSZ F VASILAROS, SOPHIA VASILAROS, JACK WAZIO, IRENA 119 BAYSIDE DR 111 BAYSIDE DR 110 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 "CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 WILK, THOMAS J WILK, STASIA ZIMMERMANN, GUNDER 451 HARBOR DRS 12912 CASTLEMAINE DR INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - TAMPA FL 33626 - 4470 3118