FLS2005-03022LL ""
xlearwater
Yt -
U
P
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax 727-562-4865
ORIGINA
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST.
EAST:
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
F IU ' FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
!J p - C Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revised 12)30/2004)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANTNAME: Lanny and Vicky Jackson
---------------
MAILING ADDRESS: 15 Glendale St Apt 41 7 Clearwater. Fl -13767
PHONE NUMBER: (727) 9024 FAX NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
- (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6)
MAC 31
J.W. Smith Design Group
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS: 35095 US Hwy 19?1K. Palm HArbor, FL 34684 CITVOFCLEARWAT
PHONE NUMBER: (727) 785-4441 FAX NUMBER: (727) 789-0077
CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: =Matt@.iwsmlthdesign com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 785 Bay Esplanade
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:'Lot 10 Block 38 Mandalay. As recorded in Plat Book 14 pgs 32-35 According
(if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) the Public Record'
PARCEL NUMBER: n-q/2q/11,/raFl,r,/8'24/(1 nn of Rinellasr-n±,
PARCEL SIZE: .15 Acres. 6646 S. F.
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S)• - KI , A -
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square fOULage of nonrestoentiai use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Reduction in front and side bui 1 di ng and pool setback lines
Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations: e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
FL
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater
APR 2 8 2005
Attachment PLANNING C EKRThJFNT
SECTION «B„ CITY OF CLEM' '..'`.
Proposed User(s) and size(s): Existing single family residence built in 1937-last sold in
2004. Proposed use remains single family residence.
Description of Request: Request reduction in the front setback (Mango St.) from 25 feet
to 3.5 feet at garage and 2.0 feet at residence (3.0' pool) and also reduction in the front setback
(Bay Esplanade) from 25 feet to 8.33 feet at garage. The addition is shown by the shaded area
depicted on the attached site plan.
SECTION "D"
General Applicability Criteria:
1. The existing garage structure does not comply with the present day setback
requirements for the front yard (25'). The survey shows the existing garage 4.4' to 5.2'
back from the north property line and 19.9' to 21.3' back from the west property line.
The proposed addition to the structure would decrease these distances min 3.5' from the
north property line and min. 8.33' from the west property line respectively. This addition
to the residence and garage structure will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, covera e,
density and character of adjacent properties in which this property is located. 0?
2. The proposed addition to the garage and residence and the decrease of the setback
from the north and west property lines will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of the adjacent land and building or significantly impair the value
thereof.
3. The proposed addition to the garage and residence (pool) and the decrease of the
setback from the street will not adversely affect health of safety or persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
4. The proposed addition to the garage and residence (pool) will not contribute to the
traffic congestion.
5. The proposed addition to the garage and residence (pool) is consistent with the 4W ?
community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The proposed addition to the garage and residence and the decrease of the setback
from the street is designed to minimize adverse visual effects of the existing structure.
The design does not change the acoustic, olfactory or hours of operation impacts on
adjacent properties.
ORIGINAL
0 0
Attachment
Page 2
Residential Infill Project Criteria:
1. The proposed addition to the garage and residence (and pool) and the decrease of
the front setbacks from the street to the existing structure (originally built in 1937) does
not have to be changed by the owner as the existing condition is grand fathered in.
However, if the present setback requirement of 25' is imposed the ability to have a garage
for his residence would be eliminated.
2. The proposed addition to the garage and the residence and the decrease of the
setback from the street will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties and in fact should increase the street appeal of the abutting properties because
of the continuity of the design and facade remodel. The existing value of the subject
property will not be effected except that the refurbishing of the garage structure will
comply with the present day code requirements.
3. The proposed work is otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater subject to, of
course, meeting the applicable building codes.
4. There is no change in the use of the subject property.
5. The proposed addition to the garage and residence (and pool) and the decrease of
the setbacks from the street will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the subject property by
the refurbished construction meeting present applicable building codes.
6. The design of the addition and the decrease in the existing setbacks enhances the
community character of the immediate vicinity of the subject property and acknowledges
the City of Clearwater's long term development goals as a whole.
7. The existing structure is grand fathered in and does not have to be changed. The
proposed change increases the livability of the residence and would add off street parking
capability that would benefit both the immediate vicinity of the subject and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
.C,
APR 2 8 2005
ORIGINAL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CI T OF CLiARAV J-Xi 7f-V!
0
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
Y SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D.
?
1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) UKUNAL
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located. SEE ATTACHED
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. SEE ATTACHED
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use. SEE ATTACHED
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
SEE ATTACHED
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
SEE ATTACHED
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
SEE ATTACHED
RE"EVED
MAR 31 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater
r1
r
?
1. Provide complete responses to the seven RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Exp Tin how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
SEE ATTACHED
R
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
SEE ATTACHED
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
SEE ATTACHED
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
SEE ATTACHED
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
SEE ATTACHED
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
SEE ATTACHED
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
SEE ATTACHED
RECEVED
MAR 31 2005
MANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CIEARWATFR
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im
addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance
the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exeml
to this requirement.
If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
R At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: ORIGINAL
X Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
A Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the
CNit? manual.
_1 N Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
_X Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall
be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
XU SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
XIA LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
9 PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to
N / A the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
EXX GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
I?A PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):RECEIVED
All dimensions;
_X_ North arrow; X Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; MAR 31 2005
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
X All required setbacks; PLANNING DEPARTMENT
_X__ All existing and proposed points of access; CITV OF CLEARWATER
?A All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater
X Location of all street rights-of-wa?Win and adjacent to the site; 7
_WA Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
X and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
_V7A Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
MA Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701);
N/A Location of all landscape material;
_WA Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
MIA Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and ORIGINAL
_ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
q, SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
_)( Land area in square feet and acres;
_ Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
X_ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
/A Gross floor area devoted to each use;
A Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
_Y/A Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
T Building and structure heights;
`& Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
_IA Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %3 X 11) and color rendering if possible;
WlA
NIA
JA
W
UR
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
T I t
?2?2C?C?HNED
MAR 31 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITV OF C! EAPWATER
me nven ory, prepared by a certified arbonst , of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
? LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required "perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed
landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 '/: X 11) (color rendering if possible);
? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN S?MITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project.
? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/: X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
N/A to remain.
? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs
N /A shall include the street address (numerals)
O Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
1
I L 1 -' ` ' +. J
A Reduced si na a proposal 8 Y: X 11 (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: '? ?a W t ??? ? 30 : ;A;0+& , n
N / A • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. CrY 0
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is
on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning
Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
N/A Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway
legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
ORIGINAL
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in tbi.4;epplication. f
Signatu/e of property owner or representative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this ???? day of
140H I A.D. 200-57 to me and/or by
who is personally known has
produced /V?f} as
identification.
Notary public,
My commission expires: KATHY R. TOKOS
EXPIRES:Nmember20,2007
1-8003-NOTARY FL Notary Discount Assoc. Co.
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: V I\ I V I( V M 1.._
(Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names)
1. That (I am/wee are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) RECHVEo
Z005
t , I? PLANNING DEPARTMENT
/`i CAMM.'
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: ?Y &1't y th /?e5i91Q?
ffin1k
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true a correct.
rop y O er
Pro erty Own
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
UQ.jjjj_ , ?b05 personally appeared nn 14?(/K I J Q (,KC? who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents o e Idavit that he/she signed.
TIFFANY L. WALKER Notary Public
My Commission Expires: ?D EXPIRES COMMISSION THROUGH # I I. DD 124604
F9a TARY 2006
E Oa
R/DA 80PIpED (D THROUGH
H
SAPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewAflexible standard development application residential inM 2005.doc
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater
03/15/2005 TUE 10:12 PAX 727 4 048 Stephen Watts. PA 0003/003
Sate of Florida
County of Pinellas
ORIGINAL
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 24th day of September, 2004 by Kaduyn L. Flint, %vho [j is
personally known or [X] has produced a drive's license as identif cati e
[Notary Seal] Notary Put
Printed N _ T -
My C lrx Tres:
!l..i.. . i+exe'"'!
• CYN V. COX
c
? , Camre?abt? !? ?21?p
!!!i!M!!i!!!!lfeiN!!!!ip!!!i!!!?
RECEDED
MAR :? 1 20D5
PLANNING DEPgI2TIWENi
CITY OF CLEARUyqTER
warm w Dea -page 2 Doubleran"
03/15/2005 TUE 10:11 FAX 727 4 048 Stephen Watts. PA ? 0002/003
KARIXEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT
ORIGINAL
1OFF REC 8K, 138M PG: 241-242
Pr d and return to D DOC STAW1. $693L M
Stephen G. Watts
Attorney at Law
Stephen G. Watts, P.A.
606 Druid Road East "'D
Clearwater, FL 33756 RECEIVk
727461-3232
File Number: 04-098
Will Call No.: 495 MAR 31 2005
[Space Above This Line For Recording Data!
Warranty Deed CITY OF CLEARWATER
This Warranty Deed made this 24th day of September, 2004 between Kathryn L. Flint, a single woman whose post
office address is c% Jonathan R Marlcr, Solicitor, 416 North Service Road E. 3rd Floor, Oakville, ON L6H SR2,
grantor, and Lanny R. Jackson and Yield J. Jackson, husband and wife whose post office address is 651 Say Esplanade,
Unit #1, Clearwater, FL 33767, grantee:
(Whenever used herein the terms "grantor" and 'grantee include all the parties to this iustruawnt and the heirs, legal rgneuxtwives. and amgas of
individuals, and the successors and assigns of carparations, ousts and trustees)
Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the gum of TEN AND NT Ol100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other
good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,
has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land,
situate, lying and being in Pinellas County Florida to-wit:
Lot 10, Block 39, N ANDALAY, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 14, Page 32-35
of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida..
Parcel Identification Number: 05-29-15-54665-038-0100
Together with all the tm=ents heredita =ts and Appurter c+es thereto belonging or in anysvat appertainiag.
To Have and to Hold, the same in fee sitnpie forever.
And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the
grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said
lard and will do-fend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all
encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2003.
In Witness "Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grautor's hand and seal the day and year first above written.
.n - (Seal)
I. X Kathryn i- Fft
Doubtellmee
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:
•
•
ORIGINAL
FLS2005-03022
785 BAY ESPLANADE
Date Received: 03/31/2005
JACKSON RES.
ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR
LAND USE: RU
ATLAS PAGE: 249A
CLWCoverSheet
i
PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT E
i - S
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 16, 2005
J.W. Smith Design Group
Mr. Roger Painter
35095 US Hwy 19 North
Palm Harbor, FL 34684
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-03022 at 785 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Painter:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community
Development Code. On June 2, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your
application for Flexible Standard Development approval for additions to an existing single family
residence located in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district. The request includes a
front (west) setback reduction from 25 feet to 8.33 feet (to building); a front (west) setback reduction
from 25 feet to 10.16 feet (to driveway); a front (north) setback reduction from 25 feet to two feet (to
building); a front (north) setback reduction from 25 feet to zero feet (to pool deck); a waterfront (east)
setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building); a waterfront (east) setback reduction from 25
feet to 6.5 feet (to raised spa); and a waterfront (east) setback reduction from 10 feet to two feet (to
pool deck), as a Residential Infill Project, per Section 2-203.C. The DRC recommended approval of
the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with Detached Dwellings criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C;
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and
3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions for Approval:
1. That a separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of
the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city;
2. That any concrete driveway expansions constructed within the right-of-way of Mango Street shall
be a minimum 6 inch thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3,000 PSI with 6" x 6" / 10' x 10'
Welded Wire Fabric;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR Hoyt, HAMILTON, COUNCIIMEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRD,.4TIVF AcrION EMPLOYER'S
September 16, 2005
FLS2005-03022 - Page 2
3. That a request for an Engineering "Easement Inspection" be made prior to pouring the concrete
pool deck. In addition, the north property line shall be staked out prior to this inspection;
4. That the final design of the structure be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted; and
5. That the pool deck and spa not exceed 12 inches above existing grade.
I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve
your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above five conditions. The approval is
based on and must adhere to the application dated received March 31, 2005 and the revised site plan
dated received August 30, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Standard Development approval (December 26, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner 1, at 727-562-4547.
You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com.
Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, AICP
Planning Director
S: 0anning Department) C D BTlex Standard (FLS)Unactive or Finished Cases0ay Esplanade 785 Jackson (LMDR) JVSIFLS2005-03022
Development Order. doe
CITY OF C LEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
December 20, 2005
Roger Painter
J.W. Smith Design Group, Inc.
35095 U.S. Hwy 19 North, Suite 103
Palm Harbor, FL 34684
RE: Extension of Development Order - Case FLS2005-03-022
785 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Painter:
I am in receipt of your letter requesting an extension of time relative to the above
referenced Development Order and hereby approve of an extension to Monday, June 26,
2006.
In granting the six month extension, it is our hope that the additional time will be
sufficient to obtain the permit which is pending and commence work on the project.
Please be advised that any subsequent request for an extension of time must be made to
the Community Development Board. In the event that such a request is made, established
timelines in getting before the Board must be observed.
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, tAlr
Planning Director
CC: John Schodtler
File
FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR
BILL. JONSON, VICe-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER
HoYT HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSI?N, COUNCHAIEMBER
"FQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
12/19/05 MON 18:17 FAX 7890077 JW SMITH DESIGN 17]001
f -D
DEc 2 0 2005 t
4
a
MQF CIEA WA
35095 US Hwy 19 North
Suite 103
Palm Harbor, Florida 34684
Ph (727) 785-4441 Fax (797) 789-0077
-.____
__._...........
;Facsimile transmittal
To: Mr. Michael Delk
City of Clearwater Fax: 727-562-4576
From: JW Smith Design Group Date: 12/ 19/05
Re: Case #FLS2005-03022
785 Ba Es lanade Pages: 2 incl. cover
Cc:
C) Urgent El For review ? Please comment ? Please reply ? Please recycle
Comments:
12/19/05 MON 18:17 FAX 7890077
0
JW SMITH DESIGN
C?
DEC 2 0 2005
A
December 19, 2005
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
RE: Case FL S2005-03022
785 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Delk
Q002
As per our phone conversation with Mr. Schodder we are requesting an
extension for filing an application for a building permit. It states in your letter dated
September 16, 2005 that we have a year from December 26, 2004 to apply for a permit.
Since we received our approval with conditions on September 16, 2005 we need
additional time to award contracts to contractors, before we apply for a building permit.
We feel an extension to June 26, 2006 would be required in order for us to
finalize drawings and cost.
Thank you
a---Q
Roger Painter
Project Architect
PLannyy Home Owner
35095 U.S. Highway 19 North, Suite 103, Palm Harbor, FL 34684
Ph: (727) 785-4441 Fax: (727) 789-0077
wwwjwsmithdesign.com
Dec. 21 2005 09:09AM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 97890077 Dec.21 09:08AM 00'43 SND 01 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS ' MBNLJ' ##04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329).
Prol
J
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
1 n 1
???? MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 16, 2005
J.W. Smith Design Group
Mr. Roger Painter
35095 US Hwy 19 North
Palm Harbor, FL 34684
RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-03022 at 785 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Painter:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community
Development Code. On June 2, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your
application for Flexible Standard Development approval for additions to an existing single family
residence located in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district. The request includes a
front (west) setback reduction from 25 feet to 8.33 feet (to building); a front (west) setback reduction
from 25 feet to 10.16 feet (to driveway); a front (north) setback reduction from 25 feet to two feet (to
building); a front (north) setback reduction from 25 feet to zero feet (to pool deck); a waterfront (east)
setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building); a waterfront (east) setback reduction from 25
feet to 6.5 feet (to raised spa); and a waterfront (east) setback reduction from 10 feet to two feet (to
pool deck), as a Residential Infill Project, per Section 2-203.C. The DRC recommended approval of
the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with Detached Dwellings criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C;
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and
3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions for Approval:
1. That a separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of
the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city;
2. That any concrete driveway expansions constructed within the right-of-way of Mango Street shall
be a minimum 6 inch thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3,000 PSI with 6" x 6" / 10' x 10'
Welded Wire Fabric;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR
PRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOY'1' HAm1C1'ON, COUNCIUNIEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILME9iBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILNIB\IBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE AC-1.10N EMPLOYER"
September 16, 2005
FLS2005-03022 - Page 2
3. That a request for an Engineering "Basement Inspection" be made prior to pouring the concrete
pool deck. In addition, the north property line shall be staked out prior to this inspection;
4. That the final design of the structure be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted; and
5. That the pool deck and spa not exceed 12 inches above existing grade.
I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve
your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above five' conditions. The approval is
based on and must adhere to the application dated received March 31, 2005 and the revised site plan
dated received August 30, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Standard Development approval (December 26, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner 1, at 727-562-4547.
You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com.
Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, AICP
Planning Director
S.•IPlanning DepartmentIC D BIFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CasesWay Esplanade 785 Jackson (LMDR) JVSIFLS2005-03022
Development Order.doc
Sep. 19 2005 01:24PM
YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept
YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 97890077 Sep.19 01:22PM 01'05 SND 02 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-73291.
1? Ril,Jr'rr
rc G2?
-:f VA - ,
..?..
Zoning Condition
Conditions Associated With
FLS2005-03022
785 BAY ESPLANADE
John Schodtler
727-562-4547
05/12/2005 The raised spa is permitted to exceed no more than 12 inches above EXISTING GRADE in the 25 Not Met
foot waterfront setback. The most recent revised plans indicate the top of spa at 1'-0" above pool
deck. This note needs to be revised to 1'-0" above existing grade.
The raised spa is permitted to exceed no more than 12 inches above existing grade in the 25 foot
waterfront setback. If this cannot be accomplished, perhaps moving the spa to the east end of
the pool would get the spa out of the 25 foot waterfront setback and then it would be allowed more
than 12 inches above existing grade.
Clarify the increase in height above grade for the raised spa.
Print Date: 09/15/2005
CaseConditons
Page 1 of 1
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2"d Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO- F0 G E, R- PAL i 9-- 7-r
FAX: -7 Sg O o -I Phone:
FROM: ?v ?r J Phone:
DATE: 0 9 t SE D SUBJECT: f- L S "?O o s 6 3 u as
-?Ss- eJ Ay E 5 P,401• 6
MESSAGE: ONE l ST r_QMSC-P--
L6t? , 12155Uam 1-r emti REAJ i SGC> *SAGE C
il-1 E MAST?>2
O(L Cc)MF; i,,,5 &N&> f2GPL-1tJE5
F1Le PL.AWS.
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
Sep. 15 2005 02:14PM
YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept
YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 97890077 Sep.15 02:13PM 00'51 SND 02 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+'. OR
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
FROPt :CitgOf"-learwater,-Plan DeF* FH,; IIO. Z.7 562 4&-, •Hug. 01 213_, 10:51Ht4 F.
c
Conditions Associated With
FLS2005-03022
'W 785 SAY ESPLANADE
ORIGINAL
'oning Condition John Schodtter 727=W2-4547
05/12/2005 The raised spa is permitted to exceed no more than 12 inches above existing grade in the 25 foot Not Met
waterfront setback. if this cannot be accomplished. perhaps moving the spa to the east end of
the pool would get the spa out of the 25 foot waterfront setback and then it would be allowed more
than 12 inches above existing grade.
Clarify the increase in height above grade for the raised spa.
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicabiilty Criteria #1 is being met. HOW is a front (west) setback of 8.33
feet consistent with eylsting structures in the neighborhood?
05/23/2005 Clarify how General ApplicabiKity Criteria #1 is being met How is a front (north) setback of 2.0
feet consistent with existing structures located on beach access right of ways?
05/23/2005 Clarify hove Residential lnfifl Criteria #1 is being met. It appears that there is a large amount of
property to the south side of the existing structure that could be utilized for a garage or living
space and meet all required setbacks.
05123/2005 Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #!S is being met. How do the requested reduced setbacks
create a form and function that enhances the community character?
05/23/2005 Clarify how Residential infili Criteria #7 is being met. How are all of the setback reductions
justified by the benefits to the community character etc...7
D kip
FAUG3 `_ 2005 i
PLANNING & OEVEt0 r1. "JCS
QTY OF Ci .." :'?'r:a .
(! ?? i,? )?D
Print Date: 0810112005
;-L -o`er
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseCcr?ditons
Page 1 of 1
•
0
ORIGINAL
HH1:1111[CI1INHI [I[tiII;NI
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
August 30, 2005
Attn: John Schodtler
RE: Conditions associated with FLS2005-03022
785 Bay Esplanade
Clearwater, Florida
Zoning Condition 05/12/2005
The top of the spa elevation has been changed to 1'-0" which is permitted within the 25'-
0" setback. See drawing, and note spa elevation.
Zoning condition 05/23/2005 Criteria # 1, # 6, # 7.
There are three existing structures in the same 700 block on the same side of the street
of Bay Esplanade that front (west) setbacks range from 6' to 12'. The 1000 block has
structures that have no sidewalks and set very close to Bay Esplanade.
There are 6' high masonry walls that are in the 900 block that are on the property line.
See enclosed pictures and boundary sketch.
The residence at 761 Bay Esplanade is a very attractive residence. The garage is only
6' from the front property line. (see pictures) from an architects point of view, I would
say this home enhances the neighborhood, and the community.
We feel by locating the garage expansion next to the existing garage, there is less
impact on the amount of green space. We do have the space within the setback
requirements on the south side of the property. However, by locating the garage and
driveway in that area, it would create more impervious area and less green space. A
large paved driveway would lead up to the garage from Bay Esplanade, in lieu of adding
pavement to the existing drive that opens onto Mango Street which is a vacated street.
We feel by keeping the driveway in its existing location would be less noticeable.
Locating a new driveway off of Bay Esplanade would have a negative impact on the
streetscape.
Viq
L_r
r?
OR'iGINAL--
The addition to the north which has a small segment located 2' from the property line,
has little effect on Mango Street, which is a vacated street and is a large green open
area. The north addition has virtually no impact on the neighborhood. (see picture).
The owners of 785 Bay Esplanade are planning a major remodel investment, which is
going to have a major positive impact on the neighborhood and community.
Sincerely,
Roger Painter
Project Architect
L?l5 I.?' U UV I-C iI
ALIG 3 0 2005
PLAN
35095 U.S. Highway 19 North. Palm Harbor, FL 34684 Suite 103
Ph: (727) 785-4441 Fx: (727) 789-0077
www.jwsmithdesign.com
• 1 0
10:00 am Case Number: FLS2005-03022 -- 785 BAY ESPLANADE
Owner(s): Lanny R Jackson
15 Glendale St #A 17
Clearwater, Fl 33767
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Representative: J W Smith Design Group
35095 Us Hwy 19
Palm Harbor, FI 34684
TELEPHONE: 727-785-4441, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Location: 0.15 acres located at the south-east corner of the intersection of Bay Esplanade and Mango Street.
Atlas Page: 249A
Zoning District: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential
Request: Flexible Standard Development approval for additions to an existing single family residence located in the
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district. The request includes a front (west) setback reduction
from 25 feet to 8.33 feet (to building); a front (west) setback reduction from 25 feet to 10.16 feet (to
driveway); a front (north) setback reduction from 25 feet to two feet (to building); a front (north) setback
reduction from 25 feet to zero feet (to pool deck); a waterfront (east) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20
feet (to building); a waterfront (east) setback reduction from 25 feet to 6.5 feet (to raised spa); and a
waterfront (east) setback reduction from 10 feet to two feet (to pool deck), as a Residential Infill Project,
per Section 2-203.
Proposed Use: Detached dwelling
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761
2544 Frisco Drive
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767
100 Devon Dr
TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com
Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I
Attendees Included:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
1 , 1. Revise plans to show sidewalk(s) within all right-of-way(s) adjacent to this site per City's
Standards and Specifications (including Mango Street). Sidewalks shall be installed prior to
issuance of a C.O. (Community Development Code Section 3-1701.)
2. How will seawall tie back system be accessed after rear yard improvements (pool, decks,
fountain and hot tub) are installed?
All of the above to be addressed prior to DO.
Prior to building permit:
1. Any new concrete driveway portion constructed within the right-of-way of Mango Street shall
be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f.
2. Applicant shall request an Engineering "Easement Inspection" before pouring concrete pool
deck. Applicant shall have north property line staked out prior to this inspection. Request
inspection # 006, using 24 hour call in line (727) 562-4580 to order inspection.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
I . No Issues
Fire:
No Comments
Harbor Master:
No Comments
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 10
Legal:
No Comments
Land Resources:
I . No Issues.
Landscaping:
No Comments
Parks and Recreation:
I . No issues - single family addition
Stormwater:
I . No Issues
Solid Waste:
No Comments
Traffic Engineering:
I . No issues.
Planning:
1 . Provide contact agent's name for J.W. Smith Design Group. Who is actually handling the case?
2. Revise site plan to indicate locations of A/C and Pool equiptment.
3 . Two off street parking spaces must be maintained at all times. Proposed second car garage will
allow for this requirement to be met.
4. Clarify the increase in height above grade for the raised spa.
5 . Clarify if a walkway to the existing dock will be proposed? Site plans do not indicate one.
6. Clarify if a sidewalk to the Mango Street proposed porch will be proposed.
7. Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #1 is being met. How is a front (west) setback of 8.33
feet consistent with existing structures in the neighborhood? Staff recommends a block survey to
verify this data.
8. Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #1 is being met. How is a front (north) setback of 2.0
feet consistent with existing structures located on beach access right of ways? Staff recommends
a block survey to verify this data.
9. Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #5 is being met. How is a front (west) setback of 8.33
feet consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Staff recommends a
block survey to verify this data.
10. Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #5 is being met. How is a front (north) setback of 3.5
feet consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Staff recommends a
block survey to verify this data.
11 . Note: The building department's setback requirement from a seawall to the water's edge of a
swimming pool is 18 feet.
12. Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #I is being met. It appears that there is a large amount of
property to the south side of the existing structure that could be utilized for a garage or living
space and meet all required setbacks.
13. Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #6 is being met. How do the requested reduced setbacks
create a form and function that enhances the community character?
14. Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #7 is being met. How are all of the setback reductions
justified by the benefits to the community character etc...?
15. Need to verify with the building department that the new swimming pool is not too close to the
existing house (Angle of Repose).
Other:
No Comments
Notes:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page I I
r2?.yY
\55ii
Zoning Condition
.Conditions As pociated With*
FLS2005 03022
785 BAY ESPLANADE
John Schodtler
727-562-4547
05/12/2005 The raised spa is permitted to exceed no more than 12 inches above existing grade in the 25 foot Not Met
waterfront setback. If this cannot be accomplished, perhaps moving the spa to the east end of
the pool would get the, spa out of the 25 foot waterfront setback and then it would be allowed more
than 12 inches above existing grade.
Clarify the increase in height above grade for the raised spa.
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #1 is being met. HOW is a front (west) setback of 8.33 Not Met
feet consistent with existing structures in the neighborhood?
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #1 is being met. How is a front (north) setback of 2.0 Not Met
feet consistent with existing structures located on beach access right of ways?
05/23/2005 Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #1 is being met. It appears that there is a large amount of Not Met
property to the south side of the existing structure that could be utilized for a garage or living
space and meet all required setbacks.
05/23/2005 Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #6 is being met. How do the requested reduced setbacks Not Met
create a form and function that enhances the community character?
05/23/2005 Clarify how Residential. Infill Criteria #7 is being met. How are all of the setback reductions Not Met
justified by the benefits to the community character etc...?
Print Date: 08/01/2005
CaseConditons
Page 1 of 1
0 0
Clearwater
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
f',A w. &' (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: :? -.C3 1 M 1 1-H p5S ? &-pJ ?e
_?
FAX:
FROM: 7?s'o k., S, Phone:
DATE: D 0V L D SUBJECT: 1FL--5 2-01* 15- -- O3° -.2-72-7
MESSAGE:lzka?hrr GomtAewnJ t
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Z
• 0
Aug. 01 2005 10:52AM
YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept
YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 97890077 Aug.01 10:51AM 00'54 SND 02 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' ##84.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-',
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
FP,U-r,l : is i t?jOrC- l eart&ater-Pi an Dept • FHX NO. :72-11 5e2-1 48165 26 2005, 03-04PPI P
conditions Associated With '--'E CE I V E ®
05-03022
wF?J4 !.
AIL 1 b 2005
785 DAY ESPLANADE
g PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ORIGINAL 5e2-4C ITV OF CLEARWATER
ngineering Condition Steve Doherty 08116/2005 Any new concrete driveway po,ton constructed Within the lightaof-way of Mango Street rhali be Not Met
a m)ni?num 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f.
-40r- 1107&. Need sidewalk(s) installed within all right-of-way(s) adjacent to this site per City's Standards
and Specifications (including Mango Street) and must be installed prior to issuance of a C.0- Per
Community Development Code Section 3-1701.
bdL 3. Applicant shall request an Engineering "Ess,emont Inspection" before pouring concrete pool
deck. Applicant shall have north property line staked out prior to this inspection. Request
inspection # 006, using 24 hour call in line (727) 562-4880 to order inspection.
S i 1Jo794. How will property owner ass seawall #e back system after rear yard improvements (pcw,
decks, fountain and hot-tub) are installed?
bnvironrmentai Condition Heather Faessler 662-4897
05123/2006 No Issuer Net Met
.and Resource Condition Rick Albee S62-4?4.1
0512512005 No issues, Not Met
aullding Permit John Sclvdtlar 562-4604
05123/2005 Not Met
parks & Rees Condition
No issues - singie family addition Not met
Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 582-4775
Not Met
05/0912005 No issues-
Zoning Condition John Schodtler 562-4604
0410512005 1. Provdde contact agent's name for J -VV- Smdth'Design Group. Who is actually handling the case? Not Met
t2oa?1%
05112/2005
Z. Revise site plan to indicate locations of A/C and Pool equiptment.
Not Met
UdV?
0511212005
Two vff street parking spaces must be maintained at all times. Proposed second car garage will
Not t
allow for this requirement to be met.
no"tE
06112/2005 4 Clarify the Increase In height above grade for the raised spa- Not met
0511212005 5,Cdarify 9 a walkway to the existing dock vWli be proposed? Site plans do not indicate one. Not Met
5 tie 00-M
05112/2005
1p Clarify if a sidewalk to the Mango Street proposed porch will be proposed.
Not Met
05/23/2005 `7 Clarify how General Applicability' Criteria #1 is being met. Wow is a front (west) setback of 8.33 Not Met
feet consistent with existing structures in the neighborhood? Staff recommends a block survey to
verify this data,
?a?GGt's'?i?ns
Print Date- 05/2612005
Page 1 of 2
FRO11 : C i t yO f C l earwa ter-Plan Dept • FNS, 140. :77271 562 48-165 ? law..
ORIGINAL FLS2005-03022 J1 IL 10 2005
785 SAY ESPLANADE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
oning Condition John Srhodder 562.4604
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #i is being met. How is a front (north) setback of 2.0 Not Met
fleet consistent with existing structures located on beach access right of ways? Staff recommends
a block survey to verify this data.
0512312005 Clarify how General Appficabifity Criteria #l5 is being meet. How is a front (west) setback of 8-33 Not Met
feet consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Staff reconmiends a
block survey to verify this data.
13512312005 10. Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #a Is being met- How is a front (north) setback of 3.5 Not met
feet consistent with the cflrr munity character of the immediate vicinW Staff recommends a
`3 loo block survey to vaft this data.
05/2312005 //. Note: The building departments setback requirement from a seawall to the water's edge of a Not Met
swimmirv pool is 18 feet.
0&2312005 11. Clarify how Residential lnfill Criteria #1 ifi being met It appears that there is a large amount of Not Mist
prop" to the soaath side of the existing structure that could be utilized for a garage or living
5eIg 1JOTO space and meet all required setbacks.
0512312005 13. Clarify hone: Residential lnflll Crlterlaa a6 is toeing met. How do the requested reduced setbacks Not Met
S Ee$ I•?ot? create a form and function that enhances the community character?
05123/20435 l Clarify how Residential lrrfill Criteria #7 is being met_ How are all of the setback naductions Not met
5af- 6,10re justifled by the benefits to the commuri ty charades' stc_., t
0512612005/ 5. Need to verify with the building department that the new swimming pool is not Wo close to the Not met
existing house (Angle of Repose).
Print Date: 0512612005
caseCcrmmoras
Page 2 of 2
RECEIVED
JUL 15 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CIIYOFCLEARWgyER
FLS2005-03022 ORIGINAL
785 BAY ESPLANADE
Date Received: 03/31/2005
JACKSON, LANNY
ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR
LAND USE: RU
ATLAS PAGE: 249A
PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS
CLWCoverSheet
Single Family Home RECEIVED
Jackson Residence
JUL 15 ZooS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Conditions associated with FLS2005-03022 CITY OF CLEARWATER
Eng. Condition 05-16-05 ORIGINAL
1. Mango Street stops at existing driveway for residence
4. If tie backs are in raised spa location, tie backs to be moved and re-
engineered on each side of spa. Both upper and lower decks to be pavers that
can be removed if tie backs need repair.
Zoning Conditions
1. Add Jeff Smiths name to Application
6. Walkway to Mango Street entry will be part of landscaping plan.
11. Owner is requesting a variance from the 18' setback to
15. Angle of repose criteria will be met and engineered.
13 & 14. See Section D General Applicability Criteria Items 1, 2, & 3
0 ORIGINAL
SECTION "B"
Attachment
• RECEVED
-111 10 2005
PIANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Proposed User(s and size(s): Existing single family residence built in 1937-last sold in
2004. Proposed use remains single family residence.
Description of Request: Request reduction in the front setback (Mango St.) from 25 feet
to 3.5 feet at garage and 2.0 feet at residence (3.0' pool) and also reduction in the front setback
(Bay Esplanade) from 25 feet to 8.33 feet at garage. The addition is shown by the shaded area
depicted on the attached site plan.
SECTION "D"
General Applicability Criteria:
1. The existing garage structure does not comply with the present day setback
requirements fo e front yard (25'). The survey shows the existing arage 4.4' to 5.2'
back from the orth roperty line and 19.9' to 21.3' back from the west roperty line.
- The proposed addition to the structure would decrease these distances min 3.5' from the
north property line and min i-33 from the west property line respectively. This addition
to the residence and garage structure will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage,
density and character of adjacent properties in which this property is located.
2. The proposed addition to the garage and residence and the decrease of the setback
' 1? from the north and west property lines will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
n development and use of the adjacent land and building or significantly impair the value
thereof.
3. The proposed addition to the garage and residence (pool) and the decrease of the
?? setback from the street will not adversely affect health of safety or persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
/J0 4. The proposed addition to the garage and residence (pool) will not contribute to the
traffic congestion.
A ' J 5. The proposed addition to the garage and residence (pool) is consistent with the
community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The proposed addition to the garage and residence and the decrease of the setback
(? ?) from the street is designed to minimize adverse visual effects of the existing structure.
The design does not change the acoustic, olfactory or hours of operation impacts on
adjacent properties.
,.1
•
ORIGINAL
Attachment
Page 2
Residential Infill Project Criteria:
•
RECEIVED
.l1 JL 13 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
1. The proposed addition to the garage and residence (and pool) and the decrease of
the front setbacks from the street to the existing structure (originally built in 1937) does
not have to be changed by the owner as the existing condition is grand fathered in.
i However, if the present setback requirement of 25' is imposed the ability to have a garage
for his residence would be eliminated.
` 2. The proposed addition to the garage and the residence and the decrease of the
setback from the street will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties and in fact should increase the street appeal of the abutting properties because
of the continuity of the design and facade remodel. The existing value of the subject
property will not be effected except that the refurbishing of the garage structure will
comply with the present day code requirements. 06 fit? I I" 'W't, 0"q,?kl +o_
3. The proposed work is otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater subject to, of
course, meeting the applicable building codes.
4. There is no change in the use of the subject property.
5. The proposed addition to the garage and residence (and pool) and the decrease of
the setbacks from the street will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the subject property by
the refurbished construction meeting present applicable building codes.
6. The design of the addition and the decrease in the existing setbacks enhances the
community character of the immediate vicinity of the subject property and acknowledges
the City of Clearwater's long term development goals as a whole.
7. The existing structure is grand fathered in and does not have to be changed. The
proposed change increases the livability of the residence and would add off street parking
capability that would benefit both the immediate vicinity of the subject and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
FPON :City0f",Aearuater-Flan Dept • FH;x: 140. 562 4665 ?Pr. f),- _"???? :3c'"F>r-1 F'2
LL w
x
.
O I ..
c?
April 05, 2005
J W Smith Nsign Group
35095 Us llwy 1.9
Palm Harbor, Fl 34684
ORIGINAL
RE: FLS2005-030221 -- 785 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Incompleteness
Dcar J W Smith Design Group :
3111 1 -0 2005
PLANNING D WA RT
Cgy OF CLEA
The Planning Staff Ims entered your application into the Depamtient's filing system and assigned the
case numbtT. r LS2005-03022_ After a piU- iminaty review of the submitted doCUMents, staff has
determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments.
V o taF- 1. Revised application page 6 of 7. Provide signrat ux-e of pr openty owner ar nepr>rsentativc_ Needs
to be notorizcd.
po N 2. Provide written subrnittal requirements. Pagcs 2 and 3 state "sec attach." nothing was
submitted with application.
b p t-LLP, 3. Provide contact agents runic for J. W, Smith Design Group, Who is actually handling the
case? Avp J r-rr- 5M rTA tj "OEM A 41e"T 1J AMA
00 N 19- 4. Provide building elevations for all four sides_ Provide 14,sets on 8.5" x 11" and one set on 24"
x 36"
I'j p bl e- 5. Provide 15 sets of site plan on 24" x 36"
b p r.t 6. Provide estimated project vtt.lua for the proposed additions_ CXYo• oD
Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Starr. No further dcvelopnmat
review action shall be takem until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed
complete- Please resubmit by Monday, April 11, 2005 (12.00 noarra?-
I you have any questions, pied-se do not hesitate to contact me at 727-56-1-4,604 or
JohtL SehodtlerCc ?niyclcaiwater. corn.
Sincerely yours,
John. Sc-hmitler
Planner I
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mt3NICTPAL SERVICES R ILDING
100 SOUTH MYR7'l,h AVENUI?, CLEARWATL•R, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 5624576
WWW.MYCLEARWATMC0M
EINJED
REC
tune, urr„?„?p??r. k?? Pz92017S47s,-.i_ - lsy #.-IyC&MAN.-fM*
FROM :CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept
May 26, 2005
RECE cu
J W Slv M4 DESIGN GROUP, 1! N- ? `' MIS
350-95 US HWY 19
MR. MATT SCI• OEPPE pLMNINGDEPARTMENT
PALM .HARBOR. FL 34684 CRy OF C&IRWAMR
RE: V 52005-03022 J MCATED AT 785 BAY ESPLANADE - JACKSON, LANNY
Dear J W SMI"1'.H DESION GROUP:
The tbllowing arc comments generated at the CitVs. Psi-Development Review Committee
(PILE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number.: FLS2005-63012. These comments are genemed
early tx? give you assistance in Prep8ring responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Mec;t
onju=6,21005. -,17"j,
Please be prepared to address these comments and quay others that may be generated at the DR.C
sateeting. Rcsubtnittals will not lie accepted at the w.4=tin,. please make arrangements to resubmit to
S,heny Watkins after the DRC meeting.
If you- have any questions about tithes or location., please contact Sherry Waxlltins, at. 727-562-4-582-
Sincerely,
Jon Scltodtler
Plawer T
FHX 140. • 72` ! 562 4865 Y. 2-6 2'13-CF, 0.3: 4PF-f P1
•
IRIGINAL
CITY CLEARWATER
lPl MNG DEPARTMENT
Fast Offices Box 4748, ClearwaWr, l-Moxida 33758-4748
Mur&-ip;J $etvices Ruilding. 100 ,C4aiath M3?rt]e Av i?e, C`ieatv??atet, floe ida 33756
TCl,gliotie (7'27) 56 -4567 Fax(727)5624576
Cc: File
• r
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone (727) 5624567 Fax (727) 562-4576
May 26, 2005
J W SMITH DESIGN GROUP,
35095 US HWY 19
MR. MATT SCHOEPPE
PALM HARBOR FL 34684
RE: FLS2005-03022 LOCATED AT 785 BAY ESPLANADE - JACKSON, LANNY
Dear J W SMITH DESIGN GROUP:
The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee
(PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLS2005-03022. These comments are generated
early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting
on June 6, 2005.
Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that may be generated at the DRC
meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to
Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting.
If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582.
Sincerely,
Jo Schodtler
Planner I
Cc: File
rv r?r
??Conditions Associated With
FLS2005-03022
g
+ 785 BAY ESPLANADE
Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4576
05/16/2005 1. Any new concrete driveway portion constructed within the right-of-way of Mango Street shall be Not Met
a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f.
2. Need sidewalk(s) installed within all right-of-way(s) adjacent to this site per City's Standards
and Specifications (including Mango Street) and must be installed prior to issuance of a C.O. per
Community Development Code Section 3-1701.
3. Applicant shall request an Engineering "Easement Inspection" before pouring concrete pool
deck. Applicant shall have north property line staked out prior to this inspection. Request
inspection # 006, using 24 hour call in line (727) 562-4580 to order inspection.
4. How will property owner access seawall tie back system after rear yard improvements (pool,
decks, fountain and hot-tub) are installed?
Environmental Condition Heather Faessler 562-4897
05/23/2005 No Issues Not Met
Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 562-4741
05/25/2005 No Issues. Not Met
Building Permit John Schodtler 562-4604
05/23/2005 Not Met
Parks & Recs Condition
No issues - single family addition Not Met
Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775
05/09/2005 No issues. Not Met
Zoning Condition John Schodtler 562-4604
04/05/2005 Provide contact agent's name for J.W. Smith Design Group. Who is actually handling the case? Not Met
05/12/2005 Revise site plan to indicate locations of A/C and Pool equiptment. Not Met
05/12/2005 Two off street parking spaces must be maintained at all times. Proposed second car garage will Not Met
allow for this requirement to be met.
05/12/2005 Clarify the increase in height above grade for the raised spa. Not Met
05/12/2005 Clarify if a walkway to the existing dock will be proposed? Site plans do not indicate one. Not Met
05/12/2005 Clarify if a sidewalk to the Mango Street proposed porch will be proposed. Not Met
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #1 is being met. How is a front (west) setback of 8.33 Not Met
feet consistent with existing structures in the neighborhood? Staff recommends a block survey to
verify this data.
Print Date: 05/26/2005
CaseConditons
Page 1 of 2
FLS2005-03022
785 BAY ESPLANADE
Zoning Condition John Schodtler 562-4604
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #1 is being met. How is a front (north) setback of 2.0 Not Met
feet consistent with existing structures located on beach access right of ways? Staff recommends
a block survey to verify this data.
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #5 is being met. How is a front (west) setback of 8.33 Not Met
feet consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Staff recommends a
block survey to verify this data.
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #5 is being met. How is a front (north) setback of 3.5 Not Met
feet consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Staff recommends a
block survey to verify this data.
05/23/2005 Note: The building department's setback requirement from a seawall to the water's edge of a Not Met
swimming pool is 18 feet.
05/23/2005 Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #1 is being met. It appears that there is a large amount of Not Met
property to the south side of the existing structure that could be utilized for a garage or living
space and meet all required setbacks.
05/23/2005 Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #6 is being met. How do the requested reduced setbacks Not Met
create a form and function that enhances the community character?
05/23/2005 Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #7 is being met. How are all of the setback reductions Not Met
justified by the benefits to the community character etc...?
05/26/2005 Need to verify with the building department that the new swimming pool is not too close to the Not Met
existing house (Angle of Repose).
Print Date: 05/26/2005 CaseConditons
Page 2 of 2
-? 78q- ba
0 9
May. 26 2005 03:05PM
YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept
YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 97890077 May.26 03:04PM 01'14 SND 03 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
F/ / r-1% I It
0 •
Case Number: FLS2005-03022 -- 785 BAY ESPLANADE
Owner(s): Lanny R Jackson
15 Glendale St # A17
Clearwater, Fl 33767
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Representative: J W Smith Design Group
35095 Us Hwy 19
Palm Harbor, F134684
TELEPHONE: 727-785-4441, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Location: 0.15 acres located at the south-east corner of the intersection of Bay Esplanade and Mango Street.
Atlas Page: 249A
Zoning District: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential
Request: Flexible Standard Development approval for additions to an existing single family residence located in the
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district. The request includes a front (west) setback reduction
from 25 feet to 8.33 feet (to building); a front (west) setback reduction from 25 feet to 10.16 feet (to
driveway); a front (north) setback reduction from 25 feet to two feet (to building); a front (north) setback
reduction from 25 feet to zero feet (to pool deck); a waterfront (east) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20
feet (to building); a waterfront (east) setback reduction from 25 feet to 6.5 feet (to raised spa); and a
waterfront (east) setback reduction from 10 feet to two feet (to pool deck), as a Residential Infill Project,
per Section 2-203.
Proposed Use: Detached dwelling
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, F133761
2544 Frisco Drive
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767
100 Devon Dr
TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com
Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I
Attendees Included:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
1 . 1. Any new concrete driveway portion constructed within the right-of-way of Mango Street shall
be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f.
2. Need sidewalk(s) installed within all right-of-way(s) adjacent to this site per City's Standards
and Specifications (including Mango Street) and must be installed prior to issuance of a C.O. per
Community Development Code Section 3-1701.
3. Applicant shall request an Engineering "Easement Inspection" before pouring concrete pool
deck. Applicant shall have north property line staked out prior to this inspection. Request
inspection # 006, using 24 hour call in line (727) 562-4580 to order inspection.
4. How will property owner access seawall tie back system after rear yard improvements (pool,
decks, fountain and hot-tub) are installed?
Environmental:
1 . No Issues
Fire:
No Comments
Harbor Master:
No Comments
Legal:
No Comments
Land Resources:
1 . No Issues.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 2, 2005 - Page 7
r?-
k
•
Landscaping:
No Comments
Parks and Recreation:
I . No issues - single family addition
Stormwater: '
No Comments
Solid Waste:
No Comments
Traffic Engineering:
1 . No issues.
•
Planning:
1 . Provide contact agent's name for J.W. Smith Design Group. Who is actually handling the case?
2. Revise site plan to indicate locations of A/C and Pool equiptment.
3 . Two off street parking spaces must be maintained at all times. Proposed second car garage will
allow for this requirement to be met.
4. Clarify the increase in height above grade for the raised spa.
5 . Clarify if a walkway to the existing dock will be proposed? Site plans do not indicate one.
6. Clarify if a sidewalk to the Mango Street proposed porch will be proposed.
7. Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #1 is being met. How is a front (west) setback of 8.33
feet consistent with existing structures in the neighborhood? Staff recommends a block survey to
verify this data.
8. Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #1 is being met. How is a front (north) setback of 3.5
feet consistent with existing structures located on beach access right of ways? Staff recommends
a block survey to verify this data.
9. Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #5 is being met. How is a front (west) setback of 8.33
feet consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Staff recommends a
block survey to verify this data.
10. Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #5 is being met. How is a front (north) setback of 3.5
feet consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Staff recommends a
block survey to verify this data.
11 . Note: The building department's setback requirement from a seawall to the water's edge of a
swimming pool is 18 feet.
12. Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #1 is being met. It appears that there is a large amount of
property to the south side of the existing structure that could be utilized for a garage or living
space and meet all required setbacks.
13. Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #6 is being met. How do the requested reduced setbacks
create a form and function that enhances the community character?
14. Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #7 is being met. How are all of the setback reductions
justified by the benefits to the community character etc...?
pow
pD1D Tl C M A1?j Ua) A G4gn1 P o
15.
Other:
No Comm is
Notes:
s CA.)
LI?6 'rte G" -g L,a ov-5 °
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 2, 2005 - Page 8
orrsiy,? i •
Conditions Associated With
FLS2005-03022
??* g-P 785 BAY ESPLANADE
Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4576
05/16/2005 1. Any new concrete driveway portion constructed within the right-of-way of Mango Street shall be Not Met
a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f.
2. Need sidewalk(s) installed within all right-of-way(s) adjacent to this site per City's Standards
and Specifications (including Mango Street) and must be installed prior to issuance of a C.O. per
Community Development Code Section 3-1701.
3. Applicant shall request an Engineering "Easement Inspection" before pouring concrete pool
deck. Applicant shall have north property line staked out prior to this inspection. Request
inspection # 006, using 24 hour call in line (727) 562-4580 to order inspection.
4. How will property owner access seawall tie back system after rear yard improvements (pool,
decks, fountain and hot-tub) are installed?
Building Permit John Schodtler 562-4604
05/23/2005
Parks & Recs Condition
No issues - single family addition
Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo
05/09/2005 No issues.
562-4775
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Zoning Condition John Schodtler 562-4604
04/05/2005 Provide contact agent's name for J.W. Smith Design Group. Who is actually handling the case? Not Met
05/12/2005 Revise site plan to indicate locations of A/C and Pool equiptment. Not Met
05/12/2005 Two off street parking spaces must be maintained at all times. Proposed second car garage will Not Met
allow for this requirement to be met.
05/12/2005 Clarify the increase in height above grade for the raised spa. Not Met
05/12/2005 Clarify if a walkway to the existing dock will be proposed? Site plans do not indicate one. Not Met
05/12/2005 Clarify if a sidewalk to the Mango Street proposed porch will be proposed. Not Met
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #1 is being met. How is a front (west) setback of 8.33 Not Met
feet consistent with existing structures in the neighborhood? Staff recommends a block survey to
verify this data.
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #1 is being met. How is a front (north) setback of 3.5 Not Met
feet consistent with existing structures located on beach access right of ways? Staff recommends
a block survey to verify this data.
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #5 is being met. How is a front (west) setback of 8.33 Not Met
feet consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Staff recommends a
block survey to verify this data.
Print Date: 05/23/2005
CaseConditons
Page 1 of 2
0 01
FLS2005-03022
785 BAY ESPLANADE
Zoning Condition John Schodtler 562-4604
05/23/2005 Clarify how General Applicability Criteria #5 is being met. How is a front (north) setback of 3.5 Not Met
feet consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? Staff recommends a
block survey to verify this data.
05/23/2005 Note: The building department's setback requirement from a seawall to the water's edge of a Not Met
swimming pool is 18 feet.
05/23/2005 Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #1 is being met. It appears that there is a large amount of Not Met
property to the south side of the existing structure that could be utilized for a garage or living
space and meet all required setbacks.
05/23/2005 Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #6 is being met. How do the requested reduced setbacks Not Met
create a form and function that enhances the community character?
05/23/2005 Clarify how Residential Infill Criteria #7 is being met. How are all of the setback reductions Not Met
justified by the benefits to the community character etc...?
Print Date: 05/23/2005
CaseConditons
Page 2 of 2
Clearwater
May 12, 2005
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W . MYC LEARW AT ER. C OM
RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL AT 785 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2005-03022)
To Surrounding Property Owners:
As a property owner within 200 feet of 785 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning Department
gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval for additions to an existing single
family residence. The request includes a front (west) setback reduction from 25 feet to 8.33 feet (to building); a
front (west) setback reduction from 25 feet to 10.16 feet (to driveway); a front (north) setback reduction from 25
feet to two feet (to building); a front (north) setback reduction from 25 feet to zero feet (to pool deck); a
waterfront (east) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building); a waterfront (east) setback reduction
from 25 feet to 6.5 feet (to raised spa); and a waterfront (east) setback reduction from 10 feet to two feet (to pool
deck), as a Residential Infill Project, per Section 2-203..
On June 02, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review
and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development
Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order
approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a
decision on the application will be June 02, 2005.
The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-562-4604
or John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit
written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant
may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business
hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended.
An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within
the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review
Committee meeting on June 02, 2005 . An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning
Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our
Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
Jo n Schodtler
Planner I
Letter o/ Notification - FLS2005-03022 - 785 BAY ESPLANADE
Clearwater
0*11
April 29, 2005
J W Smith Design Group
35095 Us Hwy 19
Palm Harbor, F134684
• 0
CITY?OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W. MYC LEARWATER. C O M
RE: FLS2005-03022 -- 785 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Completeness
Dear J W Smith Design Group :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLS2005-03022. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Complete.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on June 02,
2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown
Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one
week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your
representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have
regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the
meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or
John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
OPKv?-O. SPozQAtA,,
John Schodtler
Planner I
Letter of Completeness - H'LS2005-03022 - 785 BAYESPLANADE
c
Apr. 29 2005 10:00AM
YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept
YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 97890077 Apr.29 10:00AM 00'43 SND 01 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX 1435-7329].
Clearwater
April 29, 2005
J W Smith Design Group
35095 Us Hwy 19
Palm Harbor, F134684
OCITY OF CLEORWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM
RE: FLS2005-03022 -- 785 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Completeness
Dear J W Smith Design Group :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLS2005-03022. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Complete.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on June 02,
2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown
Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one
week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your
representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have
regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the
meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or
John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely .yours,
C Pa SA?otQAtA,
John Schodtler
Planner I
Letter of Completeness - FLS2005-03022 - 785 BAYESPLANADE
Ff?OM :Citg0fi-Aearwater-Plan Dept Fkle 1.417. :7 1-1 ?' 562 4665 pr. 05 x-35 01:36PM P1 CITY OF CLEARWATER
F L A ,ly?? ,1,Ii `?G DEPARTMENT
*?LIN?? [il..• Fits, ,1 I l'IC
TPAL SERVICES BT-TIG
t' 100 SOUTH :MYR"11,1r AVENUE, CI:.EARWATER,1`I,,,MD.A 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 PAX: (727) 562-4576
WL .M Y°CLEAR-W11T M1`=OM
y
April 05, 2
J W Smith Design Group
35095 Us Hwy 1.9
Palm Harbor. Fl 34684 APR 2 8 2005
R . FLS2005-03022 - 785 BAY ESPLANADE Letter ofinco>n?plcicncsS???c???RG, QIEPARTIV`?EN'
Dcar J W Smith. Des gm Group; CRY OF CLEAR1YV,-"-%)
Tl1e.Planning Staff has entered your application into the Depr• m. nent'ti filing system and assigned the
case numbtz: MS''005-03022. After a preliminary review of tine submitted documents, staffhas
determined that tic application isncontnlete with the following comments.
I, ?RCv SCdappllcaRcM e of Provide; siv ture ofpinlseny ownerar relx?entahve. Need
_---
t<i be no- t+orizcd.-
Provide written subminal requirements. Pages 2 and 3 states s ttacl nothing; w+us
submitted with application.
3. Provi a contact gents dame for J.W. Smitli Design Group. Who is actually handling the
cased
4. Provide uilding elcvatio for all four sides_ Provid 14 sets o g.5" x 11 ands Tjlfo%x 24"-?
01de 5. 15 sets O $_1te plac e 24" x 36" ?
6. Provide estimate oject value for the proposed additions. ?ZCo? ?o• o?
Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code:states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application &MI be specified. by Stag. No fu-nher devclopmcat
review action shall be taken until the deftci.encie-s- are corrected and the application is deelned
complete. Please resubmit by Monday, April 11, 2005 (12:00 noon).
If you Piave any questions, pied-se do not hesitate to eontaet me at 727-562-4,604 or
John-Schodtler4-4my+cleatwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
JOET1. schodder
Planner I
ORIGINAL
lc+tkw /Jacvnrple?w.aca?-.,r1 ?0aS--r?5.922-MY8.4YC&P vV4bL,•
Jvft-I
HENSLER, FREDERICK C
HENSLER, MERRIE B
759 LANTANA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1427
MAXWELL, KENT L
PO BOX 8274
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8274
MARION, BRANDON
BARRETT, ALEXANDER
1915 GRANADA CT
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6678
UCKER, CHRISTOPHER J
750 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1411
WARD, ROGER C
5648 GUILFORD
INDIANAPOLIS IN 46220 - 3247
LENTRICCHIA, DOMINICK
LENTRICCHIA, KARIN
814 NARCISSUS AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334
PARKES, MICHAEL W
PARKES, MICHELLE
800 NARCISSUS AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334
GALARIS, SEAN D
GALARIS, STELLA T
809 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1302
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
a-CHALL, JULIA K STRAUSS, JOHN B
761 LANTANA AVE STRAUSS, SHARA L
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1427 765 LANTANA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1427
BASORE, JEANNE K
BASORE, ALFRED R
770 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1411
FRIDAY, MAUREEN R
26 LONG SPUR
LITTLETON CO 80127 - 5729
WATSON, SUSAN K
KNIGHT, JOHN S
756 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1411
HUMPHREYS, RICHARD J
HUMPHREYS, JOAN M
801 LANTANA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1321
HEARN, BARBARA L
815 LANTANA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1321
ROWE, ROBERT
812 NARCISSUS AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334
BALLOU, LINDA G
801 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1302
KOCALIS, STAMO T
815 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1302
HAGGITT, JOHN R
HAGGITT, SUSAN S
761 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1412
PHILLIPS, KEVIN W
PHILLIPS, LANA M
950 N MICHIGAN AVE # 450
CHICAGO IL 60611 - 4500
KONTOTHANASSIS, GEORGE
KONTOTHANASSIS, M
805 LANTANA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1321
POPE, DOROTHY L
819 LANTANA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1321
YEAROUT, JAMES E
YEAROUT, JANE R
806 NARCISSUS AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334
PIERNICK, ANTHONY T
PIERNICK, MARJORIE L
805 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1302
FULLER, JOHN & JAYNE
4885 CATHERINE ST
DORCHESTER ON NOL 1 G6
00030-
CANADA
VASILOUDES, PANAYIOTIS
VASILOUDES, HELEN THE
767 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1412
KAMBEROS, MICHAEL N THE PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE JACKSON, LANNY R
781 BAY ESPLANADE 783 BAY ESPLANADE JACKSON, VICKI J
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1412 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1412 15 GLENDALE ST # A17
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
Clearwater
April 05, 2005
J W Smith Design Group
35095 Us Hwy 19
Palm Harbor, Fl 34684
SCI' Y'1OF CLEA*RWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM
RE: FLS2005-03022 -- 785 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Incompleteness
Dear J W Smith Design Group :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLS2005-03022. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments.
1. Revised application page 6 of 7. Provide signature of property owner or representative. Needs
to be notorized.
2. Provide written submittal requirements. Pages 2 and 3 state "see attached" nothing was
submitted with application.
3. Provide contact agent's name for J.W. Smith Design Group. Who is actually handling the
case?
4. Provide building elevations for all four sides. Provide 14 sets on 8.5" x 11" and one set on 24"
x 36"
5. Provide 15 sets of site plan on 24" x 36"
6. Provide estimated project value for the proposed additions.
Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development
review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed
complete. Please resubmit by Monday, April 11, 2005 (12:00 noon).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or
John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
John Schodtler
Planner I
Letter of Incompleteness - FLS2005-03022 - 785 BAY ESPLANADE
Apr. 05 2005 01:39PM
YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept
YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 97890077 Apr.05 01:38PM 00'46 SND 01 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
r • ?
COR146A of
A 5-mg ? i3,4 y
OS PL4NA0e
ORIGINAL
tt" 3 ? Z005 ??
+ AUG 3 02005
T 7197
AAY 453PUAIA PG
0
i
0
0
f
755 BAy
FSPGAA/ADF
- r
y .AL ??. - -
F
0 kio,
.i alIr 3 ?02005
- ' i
,v,o
v ?? ?Efl
ONt. Vj j`
e w
li
¦i n Wo ?t F s 4m s
arsr¦ "- e a
¦ . ¦
low ri
at 71
IN ? +M
Z
Pro
69 xm> IDP
v j 0 $
1 ' 9 2005
I AUG 3
ORIGINAL
m
N; Soc/7V
CAJr.
GITY
F?c? X55 T?
SAY
1Rls
AG'.
0
''? ° , +c??rr t ?c?
R
AloxV
. r
e; P.
?-_ s y?" 4+r
AT, ld 4r
------------
ti .3
''} '-.Ie' y IS j... `y?R .;. a.- ?' t Z ` '*It? •? a ?- * ..?q-
411 1
AAI?
:? - u {^ ?,
TT
Y
i
Ali"
?Nr
y
N
i
. w T:
lAk . ;p.
F
4 7
{
. ... ?9. _ ?{. !Y ??(? S ' 1 ?. ? ?a. L Y+ .?. ?* a .- ? h •? ? p ?
? ?: t f fi ? sa.'
i
i
12
?f
ow
' ?` ,?ic.tl ' ? ? ? g ?. ,g` ? 1 T F,, ? fir- R F" ? `,¢? ? ' ?
r? ? ? +? a "M - F? 4? r e ?,° '.? R .• a a ,?? ? ? ? t 9Y6 e a '?; , .? ° ? `; ti..i?
s
F-
Olt%
? y 1
A '
Ir _
APO
c ,
*.wNr ,.-
tile
r
4k
A;
Jk-l
0
x i ?a
L- sue, y
?-
11T-G F ?r
i >^r as -i a ` s i
41
: v t
- 1'? , ,,..,? ',A ?` +•i "4a : !ice ??? V r V .. ' 1c?ai
FA"
y(
cy'l??p t
r ' u r
t.
AlG W
C.oAJ 5
40W f
r ^10 ask
rw ,
lie-
71
20
.
-LAN N.!
P p t .,u 'y 'raw .
4;w House
lo/ BA y
ft:; 4
L
i _
... i
*mow
1
20 j
AUG 3
S`ICS
e _ N/ 1
1
Y:. fit
F-R:
f l
j 4r
-Iptlllp Now
pp,
jai
*!Irih.
AL's 3 2W5
-- I Cc
WY C-4FCL E
V
I%or b
tilt
.? y
10
(in
t
v -..»Ol? ?+.'> ? •'M•)?'s ,way-. vr,?.?;, :,..-.
44 A
p gs"
At,
.5
?j • i
.v !w +W' ?ti rYaS, ?rwAr, ?1?.
A
IO
v z
ar,
j
V
r u
Ail
M
. L
'f4
QL'r 3 2 2005
N-il
-7 85
0
zoo
4G XtSTt wee ? /J ?rzdpos? ?'
IVi4 ?G? Q?T t DIJ,C? L
Sl, DiZ?vewAy
s
f
II L/--
Pte, Ae-C-6x
Am
FASOM ._.
1 +
PLANNING
CITY OF
785
9,4y E.
l `tt
t
1N' n'
r
M.., •
SNOW
}'4 p?
410
•
71 1 A-
i
air*
1. gib'
i
y ?
jo 'i" L%A&
T { ;`,?N
4w
A US 3 n 2005 ' r
•
8041
8hr Es Pl.4 #JAbC-
AWAMOVIS
400
M- w
e
Ai
s ?. ? ?;r v w .rc 1,?
z 'sr?
`•m, ,. ?'?` k?w ? ? • :i? `".ice _Y
a.
84'f gim-r.sP.
Pull• z
ORIGINAL
8 3q 18A 1
r
f
.,L 'N
8315
SAY
4
. RR
3 ? ?l. .4.. Owl.
L
+R?+r?YliJ4f
I wm mm
•
PM
an
.. ? w •r Y •
?sF
i
PIS 3 Not
i? 0 D'GINAL
0
ORIGINAI
•
20
pplt?=s `i
C?
,A
r
?J
e
IWO
l.0 G
p0 (A(J?
°1 s
P
kJ
Ar
3 n 2005
uKIGINAL
4L
WITT,
MOW
li
? y
t4
O
.9 2005
PLAtl'i
ORIGIINI
/4L
01000
m
Air
o
+l6- -
?1
IF-1-1f7l"
i"
11 ?
ORIGINAL ?
S
F
AFAML'
A s _
NIo
?_:Xp
.....
Im! X!
Back Locate Help Exit Codes Clearwater Zoning,,
*? ?: f s • FR4NCES _+ • • i •
Layers
LS I ?
% { # • . . e .: •_ Parcel
-GARDENIA- r r y- rVI "
Information
* ='t r, Streets
•' + • _ • -i
Parcels j
. . ,
'.. --- ED 0 Future Land Use
*' VERRE N a t? 0 Zoning
46 r '? F 4 r 0 Pinellas County
40 "o 7 _. . -; • r *l - Renal Photo
? Arlooe_ 5 •
• • • • ? l • • •
• * r ; xu i t s - * • • •
rf, Refresh Map AAA matnlly
t • r
F -*F
• y co
r + I r , LMDR ¦ • y • • s
i
• r * + # W' '
1 + . •
t •
• . r. • SRI + , 40.
• a
• •
?. ASTER ? T'r?
';?? • • a a I r e1 ? Zoning
r •?-
UOR.
?,?-- ? I
- ? @. aR i
Locate Results
Address 'score
r?r.'rTi ; n El
1 785 BAY ESPLANADE '100 MW
2 936 BAY ESPLANADE ,12 Click on a number to locate the address on the map'Then T
?
13 946 BAY ESPLANADE 52 press on the toolbar. Click on the marked parcel to see Parcel C
- and Flood Hazard Information. 0
34 1952 BAY ESPLANADE 72 `
? r~
.
c r^ I ?oyF?
= Local intranet
"? ? ?Inbo:< i?licrrsort 0... Tidemark Ahuankagejtityr of Clearta?ater Clearwater Zonin... ?Fier. Standard FLS " t' 3• h
;start 92 12
3' _
--1
W W
Ljj
V
N
Q
Q Q'
.
6.J. co Q NJ
-.5
CD
clz
0
F7 l z
' El MO :5 0
k
. ?: e9 y "h i? V
?Nr F?,6vATioN
FT b IN" A'Nm'
LkN,l-144.1104
E'
M
718:0' S6?Y/
G6Mtf ?.q(p
-i
JJ
.C F?
ws
'
?
? Ia.Metr e
warge ? steer x. ?e
E
gs
4
DAR
YJit
W/WI
J
d
-
CD
CD
Hill
OC(
r,
9 V ? K T
° 4's1Ql
co
--
r JA C\2
T30
///j - ck: r
Few, 1?L)N?\noN
9
2
0?
T 2
Va it7 \\ {/
I--'
G ? G3
`J' u U u
? m
j,"', woo R-K
"emlWATer, ems"
,t
;F old" ; .
o ?+ v
oxnw+ 111.0 Q? ? ?
_ ..
y µ1w+
''
+
•I6•BW it eldww
?
?
`
.W*H Op
g4"yt.cr?•W """` r--- n
N
-ri
G7
??
I ST 99? •? YW?
r BCMNr f"-w
I ce
N? 1 ib' b?1
(4?,O506
-s
b
s
ATOA M664QMI N ZF
SrIE - Ia7
8r<r?fWm 26.4
rau5rlr+u caw vWK rs
wu of II.D
lq+u Q ICJ N.7
'
Iynl+fi I ?
w 91.:
9a ice Itcrm 17 7
I e _ ?
i I 51 RRO . Ntw+?• . I.cpeea
I f /wlt?tt a
41
a, - , loses ?m
;v I'Vw? - I
r - Wn.N To wswv 4i9. F/+ae Ise w i
.tor b, t'?a•IC 4b, mw:p •, hs
wa+rr, + r Q
&K-PNO, _ v the We4r F ?+ a Wsu+s M1
;NG6iC G? G1?AWINCoS •° ea.rwo o.«+ I ? m u??u uftov
r,l yl'fC h?N pa M."w CAM& -.-... < ?6
A- (Wel,107, 0^TTIcN5 A
A•' F t lD srrw fiv-a?f I cu+? 7
lb K044M
Yv'•I?o"
3
I,pNM I
sw Kam
2
Uulutn Rcs1A
[ouPhEt7 N.YJre
' F
FCI/Y.
( ?f Cjl
K?tGitN = C?+zx? C?r<e
a? urrurr
flrvr rL-Om um
'Gt-Ite
h/b Pn?Y qJ o- 'Feq?
M. ) tM 41" 1
t
5r fah CIJgr) o • '12. 72
•Rmu. 1,6s6 2S2H
MW
+-ZeA
= ftOwde bow I"
wccmgw 107 o
- IM
o
uwl I&.• W o' 49.91 4Q7
9XMe•Rw(H6r) ?o; r119 I.11
91i F1 7t SuM taKUKM ?P• ? 165 Ib!
4N1015 WK(Pn?I 126 -12! O
"tom Wpm Fcw 2,947 4,IA4 ?
0
_
Z m
oz
7,101
n
?
n v C.n ri'1
M ,?.
m "r m
?Z v
I
O
a
l r
w?
a
r°
wm
y4.f.e
NOW , -
A•f
Pinellas County Property Appra Information: 05 29 15 54666 038 01 Page 2 of 5
05 / 29 / 15 / 54000 / 038 / 0100
16-Mar-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:21:51
Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales
JACKSON, LANNY R OBK; 13856 OPG: 0241
JACKSON, VICKI J
LE A
15 OLENDA ST # 17
GINAL
CLEARWATRWATER FL L 33 3767 7
OR
EVACUATION ZONE; A
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 785 BAY ESPLANADE
of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract; 260.02
sales from 2002 - 2003;
550,600 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 9 /2,004 13,856/ 241 805,000 (Q) I
1926: Book 014 Pgs 032-035 0 10 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
2004 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 477,300 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000
Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 477,300 Institutional Exem; NO Tax Exempt %: .000
Historic Exem; 0
Taxable: 477,300 Agricultural: 0
2004 Tax Information
District; CU Seawall; YES Frontage; Bay
Clearwater view:
04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
04 Taxes: 10, 963.29
1) 60 x iii 11,000.00 60.00 F
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
10, 963.29 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
Without any exemptions,
2004 taxes will be
10, 963. 29
Short Legal MANDALAY SUB BLK 38, LOT 10
Description 2005
F-+
D
MANNING DEBRWATER ..
Building Information CITY O
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.5&s=1 &t3=1 &u=2&p... 3/1612005
Pinellas County Property Appra?Information: 05 29 15 54666 038 01 Page 3 of 5
Property and Land Use Code descriptions /
05 / 29 / 15 / 54666 / 033 I 0100 :01
16-Mar-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:21:51
Residential Card 01 of i Prop Use: 210 Land Use: 01 Living Units: i
Imp Type: Single Family Prop Address: 785 BAY ESPLANADE
n m I i K i Al
7
Sl-- ruc-tural E1emE3 rt?Em-
Foundation Continuous Wall
Floor System Wood
Exterior Wall Frame/Siding
Roof Frame Gable-Hip
Roof Cover Composite Shingle
Quality'
Year Built
Effective
Heating
Cooling
Fixtures
Other Depr
Functional
Econonomic
Average
1,937
Age 30
Central Duct
Cooling (Central)
ii
sciation 0
Depreciation 0
Depreciation 0
# Stories 2.0
Floor Finish Crpt/HdTI/HdMar/Prgt
Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1.00 1,048 7) . 00 0
2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 824 8) .00 0
3) Open Porch 20 294 9) 00 0
4) Garage .35 268 10) .00 0
5) Utility .25 30 11) .00 0
6) . 00 0 12) . 00 0
ResidE?! rt-t ial. ExTra Fe:aTures
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year
1) DOCK 274 15.00 274 4,110 1,640 1,967
2) PATIO/DECK 12xi3 8.50 156 1,330 530 1,937
3) PATIO/DECK 7X17 10.00 119 1,190 480 1,967
4) 00 0 0 0 0
5) 00 0 0 0 0
6) 00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 21650
Map
F*- I F E Ff I T I M P],,,
RECEIVED
MAR 31 2000
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.5&s=1 &t3=1 &u=2&p... 3/16/2005
Pinellas County Property Appra?Information: 05 29 15 54666 038 01?
T[fim
t
r-?
Page 4 of 5
1/2 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAR 31 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.5&s=1 &t3=1 &u=2&p... 3/16/2005
Pinellas County Property AppraS Information: 05 29 15 54666 038 01 Page 5 of 5
tRIGINAL
Back to Search Page
An explanation of this screen
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.5&s=1 &t3=1 &u=2&p... 3/16/2005
-'14TEW
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 16, 2005
J.W. Smith Design Group
Mr. Roger Painter
35095 US Hwy 19 North
Palm Harbor, FL 34684
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-03022 at 785 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Painter:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community
Development Code. On June 2, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your
application for Flexible Standard Development approval for additions to an existing single family
residence located in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district. The request includes a
front (west) setback reduction from 25 feet to 8.33 feet (to building); a front (west) setback reduction
from 25 feet to 10.16 feet (to driveway); a front (north) setback reduction from 25 feet to two feet (to
building); a front (north) setback reduction from 25 feet to zero feet (to pool deck); a waterfront (east)
setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building); a waterfront (east) setback reduction from 25
feet to 6.5 feet (to raised spa); and a waterfront (east) setback reduction from 10 feet to two feet (to
pool deck), as a Residential Infill Project, per Section 2-203.C. The DRC recommended approval of
the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with Detached Dwellings criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C;
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and
3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
I
Conditions for Approval:
1. That a separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of
the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city;
2. That any concrete driveway expansions constructed within the right-of-way of Mango Street shall
be a minimum 6 inch thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3,000 PSI with 6" x 6" / 10' x 10'
Welded Wire Fabric;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYI' HA:MIL7'ON, COUNCILMEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCIL:MEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRiNtvivF ACLION EMPLOYER"
September 16, 2005
FLS2005-03022 - Page 2
3. That a request for an Engineering "Basement Inspection" be made prior to pouring the concrete
pool deck. In addition, the north property line shall be staked out prior to this inspection;
4. That the final design of the structure be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted; and
5. That the pool deck and spa not exceed 12 inches above existing grade.
I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve
your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above five conditions. The approval is
based on and must adhere to the application dated received March 31, 2005 and the revised site plan
dated received August 30, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Standard Development approval (December 26, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner 1, at 727-562-4547.
You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.m3Lclearwater.com.
Make Us Your Favorite I
Sincerely,
km-, °
Michael Delk,t
AICP
Planning Director
L
S.•IPlanning DepartmentiC D BTlex Standard (FLS)IInactive or Finished CasesWay Esplanade 785 Jackson (LMDR) JVSIFLS2005-03022
Development Order.doc
BOUNDARY SU IE Y ADDRESS. 7 A Y ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA.
SCALE.. 1" = 20' RECENED
WOOD
DOCK MAR 31 2005
ORIGINAL
PLA
.
NNING DEPARTMENT
CLEARWATER BAY
CITY OF CLEARWATER
60.00'(P)
k 6)
, 6)
V
k. 16'
FCC k
16?? 1.3'SEA WALLk 1k -/D
k 2? CORNER k• SU VEY CONTROL LI
ITNESS
60.00'(4) CORNER 18°
* 14" S.10'07'12"W.
?
16" LOT 10 W k9?
BLOCK 38 y2) k9 18"
'
?
k y
o
? ?x y' ?
ko? 15.1'
N
LOT 9
.4
14.7' y 6?
kl `x
y
ONE STORY
CBS
RESIDENCE `D
-
o
C4
N LLF-(7.18) 21.4 3
a
v Z ° 0 Q
°o v 21
?? o ^ ?+
^_ 6.
R
^
18" N
22° ??x :? ao wv z
W
Z
p ? ? Op
U1 U
8"
U
?p
Z 2' Z
9.0 o k'? y
TE 184
CONCRE
DRIVE 9'0, 13.3' 16"
4.4' 20 BUILDING LINE ` 18"
2 i
o?
U
'
°1 N
22'
26" 98? FCM 4X4 k21 k0?
WB CSW FIR 518"
N. 15-00'00-E. 60.16'(M)
N.15'00'00 E 60.00'
ASSUMED BASIS OF BEARING 14°
9p?
?1'?
06'?
?
?
Z
EP
'o g6?
61 (8
2'?
Zl 1a??
26'?
'
2
Z
g X
?.
3
BAY ESPLANADE
-PALM TREE 60 R/W
NOTE. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN PARENTHESIS AND ARE BASED ON 1988 NAVD.
/V O TE: This survey was conducted without the benefit of an abstract of title, therefore there may be other easements, right-of-way,
setback lines, agreements, reservations, restrictions, or other similar matters o{ public record, not depicted on this survey.
A - ARC CH = CHORD EDP = EDGE OF PAVEmNTRP = FOUND IRON PIPE MH = MANHOLE PP - POWER POLE
p BM = BENCH MARK CLF = CHAIN LINK FENCE EOW = EDGE OF WATER FIR = FOUND (RON ROD OIIP = OVERH AD POWER U NE RIP RADIUS PIPE
W FN = FOUND NAIL P = PUT SR
2 BRG = BEARING COND = CONCRETE FCC = FOUND M
ET iM RW YRX CAP f 4495
FOUND PINCH PIPE
a
E
V
PC = POINT OF CURVATURE EMEM
BLOaVSIUCODCSW = CONCRETE SIDEWALK FCM = FOUND CONCRETE FPP =
W CBS= CONa
?CrtLC = CALCULATED D =DEED MONUMENT' LLF = LOWEST LMNG FLOOR;& - POPMINNENTI! CONTROL POIWf UE = l/nLl1Y EAS
Lz
W
A
E
CHB = CHORD BEARING DE = DRAINAGE E4SE7NENT FH = FIRE HYDRANT M = MEASUREMENT PI - POINT OF INTERSECTION
=
D fEN
W
OO
W CE
FLOOD INFORMATION.. LEGAL: SECnoN. 5 TOWNSHIP: 29S RANGE.. 15E CERTIFIED TO.
ZONE: AE Ell LOT 10, BLOCK 38, MANDALAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT VICKI do LANNY JACKSON
N
IS
STEPHEN
G.
NUMBER. . 125096-OIOZG BOOK 14, PAGES 32-35, ACCORDING TO THE PUBLIC SU
77COR TI
ICOR 11 INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA
1LE
DATE: 09-03-03 RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA.
CEf?t
j TIFICA`TION:
FLORIDA BENCHMARK, INC.
0 - {
I HEREBY CERTIFY •TFIALt .TH•I4R
S SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER
D
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR TECHNI ff STANQA ?Er F07 8Y THE MINIMUM
OF
PROFESSIONAL L$7D SURVEYORS 1N'CHAPTER 61G17-6 OF
1298 LAKEVIEW ROAD PH. (727) 298-0286 THE FLORIDA-ADMINISTR477W CODE (PURSUMT TO SECTION
472.027:OF.THE FLORID 'STATUTES4t NOT VALID WMiOUT
CLEARWATER, FL. 33756 FAX# (727) 461-0696 SIGNATURE} AND BOSSED WITH SUqVEYOR SEAL
AUTHORIZATION NO. LB 6947 r`) S
p
'
,
A
s•F?
e
FIELD WORK BY. R DATE: 1-31-05 RENSION DATE
PAGE I «
T
2
DRAWN BY.• KK DATE. 2-04-05 3. 34
106#25-0 M. G MAYER PLS 95 DATE