The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-07068 ti Planning Department IWIatff I Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #. . ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) - PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT - A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT.NAME: Canterbury Property Management, Inc. 421 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, FL 33767 MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 727^447-13464 FAX NUMBER: 727-446-7169 Canterbury Property Management, Inc., TLS Holdings, Inc., PROPERTY OWNER(S): Canterbury Oaks, Inc., and Dorothy C. Boldog, as Trustee of the (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature (s) on page 6) M & J Trust, c/o 421 South Gulfview, Clearwater, FL 33767 E. D. Armstrong.III, Esquire AGENT NAME: Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP MAILINGADDRESS: P. 0. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 PHONE NUMBER: 727-461-18 CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 727-462-0365 E-MAIL ADDRESS: eda@jpfirm, coin B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" attached. (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: See Exhibit "A" attached PARCEL SIZE: (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 100 residential condominium units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Exhibit "B" attached. Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces,.specific use, etc.)- Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-911A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to General Criteria 1 through 6. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ? 1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Bee Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Comprehensive Infill Criteria 1 through 10. Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of'use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate. vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invo addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with I City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: - Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; - All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; - Proposed stonmwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed sthrmwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable El Ack dge nt of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall bel provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stonnwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory, prepared by a "certified arborisr, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) Q LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _ Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces, Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and. proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape (overage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 '/: X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Reguired in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). , ? Reduced signage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway leg ach turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to th?bof my knowledge and authorize City representatives to vi sit holograph the property described in t?DOlicaleon_ _ bignawre or property owner or representative w E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 30th day of June A.D. 20 05 to me and/or by F_ ll Ai m5f-.rntlg T T I who is personally known trxx PVAW CZ*X aEx i ? . otary public, My commission expires: - p? (? _?? ,p`rTOtQrg GINA L CANOPARI , MY COMMISSION # DDOW110 EXPIRES: January 26,M 14o63wwty FL Nowy semoe 813m*q Tc. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Canterbury Oaks, Inc., Canterbury Property Management, Inc and TLS Holdings, Inc. (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I amhve are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following desrn'bed property (address or general location): 401 S. Gulfview and 421 S. Gulfview 2. That this property conshtutes the property for which a request for a: (destxloe request) Flexible development approval 3. That the undersigned (hasrttave) appointed and (does/do) appoint E . D. Armstrong III , Esquire , and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP as (hlsrtheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary lo affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater. Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process this application and the owner authorkes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this applcation; 6. That (Uwe). the undersigned a certify that the foregoing is hue and co ecL TLS Holdings In Canterbury Oak I By: By: Mart' R. a Pro?tty O`vn in R. e; President President Property Owner Canterbury Property Inc. Property owner By: Property ent STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTYOF PINELLAS,) - Before me the underslgned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, onnl1his day of June 2005 personally appeared Mart?.n R. Cole, as President who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. of Canterbury Oaks, Inc., as President of Canterbury Property Management, Inc. and as President of My CommissionEzpires: TLS Hbldirigs, Inc., on behalf ?`i?pv"? ; o t WcMittler ?. Commission of said corporations, #DD23 f 906 osBonded Thru Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. S.Iplanning DepartmenttAppocation Formsidevclopment revievAnexible development application 2005-doc Ah Ah A.FFWAVfr TO AUi?1+ AGENT: Z)0/0 (!Names of ON prop" owners on coed - Ptease PRW tntt mamas) 1. no (t arrw%* ar*) the vmxv(s) and record tilts holder(s) of Im bNow tg desat and pmpe ft (eddms or general bcafloa): Martin R Cote, Ptesident Canhubury PropQty M tMent, trtc - 421 S. Guftiew BW.. Martin R. Cole, President; Canterbury OA3. mc. - 4o13, Colfv?er ow., Dattry C. R eft as Tname of the M&.t Tnw- 411 S. t uitVlew Blvd. Z. Thflt thier ptapeft copstUft the pmpeny for which a E mpm t for a: (describe vaquesQ . wSm aaacdwwt P tat bt of req eesbi 3. TM the tdrrdetsigfted (ttaxave) and (dpeeddo) appolrrt KeftF ;Zo w, 2 F,-RI and E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire as (tdsff NW) agent(s) fa M oCt& eny peduom or outer docamte 8s neonawy to alfed suds p**On; 4. That Oft a?derR has been execmd to induce the Cky of Clearvrader, B=londe to consider and ad on the above deaaated Properly. S. That S1te vas too* pwwty are neoe°"My by Cty to order tv pevtsss Oft appkadon and the owrW awhortsee Cdr mpreaentmbves to Mich wd p wt*,WaO the pmperty need to Ow appficabow 6. That (tNre), the tatdosoad eus w ty, hemby M* OW ft taragoing is true and correct. P+op" PfflPSrb turner Pmpertq Ott ' P[vpery Ownerr , Ubtk, V ?rc? l STATE Vlc Nits i FM the u en offiour d?dy by the of the , , on this ? I day of .? . pWMM* Mowed V" having bma first duly swam peposea and says that ftelshe taNX arrdatsWds ttta oorttertts of the . Gt®t hdaha algned. Public My C.otrgz3is®ioo ?= ? 2 (? ? r?j7 .. S;;pleryfa>Q pepa?ffd?l?gPntiWdolt fa?"?kj°`"e!°P?" ^?rle?rtaeuJ6ly d +wt uogM&mnSf''e kdN aAWCOOOn 21M OW 0 EXHIBIT "A" 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 75 LESS NORTH 10 FEET THEREOF AND ALL OF LOTS 76 AND 77; THAT PART OF LOT 123 OF LLOYD-WHITE SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 123, AND RUNNING THENCE ALONG ITS EASTERLY BOUNDARY 25 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT WHICH IS MIDWAY BETWEEN ITS NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 25 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; LOTS 124, 125, 126 AND 127, LLOYD- WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THAT PART OF LOT 127 BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT AND RUNNING EASTERLY 3 FEET ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH ALONG WESTERLY BOUNDARY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND LOTS 128 AND 129, LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA- AND LOT SEVENTY-FOUR (74) AND THE NORTH TEN FEET (N.10') OF LOT SEVENTY-FIVE, LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 and 1.3, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCELS NOS: PARCEL #1: 07/29/15/52380/000/1280 PARCEL #2: 07/29/15/52380/000/1270 PARCEL #3: 07/29/15/52380/000/0760 PARCEL #4 07/29/15/52380/000/0740 PARCEL #5 07/29/15/52380/000/0720 46256.110172 #349494 v1 - CANTERBURY Exhibit "A" Legal Description • U EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Siena Sands 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Section B. Description of Request The applicants propose to redevelop the existing Red Roof Inn site located at 401 and 421 S. Gulfview and the adjacent 0.167-acre retail parcel located at 411 S. Gulfview ("Property) with Siena Sands, a 100-unit condominium project. All existing structures on the Property are proposed to be removed. Specifically, the applicant seeks flexible development approval of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, in accordance with the plans submitted with this application, including relief as follows: 1. Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); and 2. Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 8'-6" feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. 0 9 Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The Propert? is located such that it has three street frontages, South Gulfview to the west, 5t Street to the north and Coronado to the east. The only adjacent parcels are located at 431 and 437 South Gulfview and are currently occupied by retail uses under apartments. As to density, the applicant is not increasing the existing density of the site. The Adam's Mark which is located at 430 S. Gulfview in close proximity to the project recently received a termination of non-conformity resulting in 87 residential dwelling units per acre. As to the overall site, which is approximately 2 acres, the approval of this request will result in 50 residential dwelling units per acre. As to scale, bulk and coverage, the proposed project provides 0.45 acre of open space--twice that which currently exists on the Property (0.22 acre) and greatly exceeds Code requirements (.09 acre). The impervious surface area (0.77) is also greatly reduced from what currently exists on the Property (0.89) and is well below the Code maximum (0.95). The proposed project meets the Design Guidelines set forth in Section VII (C), Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings of Beach by Design. The height of the proposed building does not exceed 100 feet. The bulk and mass of the project are greatly reduced, consistent with the guidelines of Beach by Design by the stepping of the fagade and building structure in two directions. The building steps away from the corner of 5th Street and Beach Walk, still allowing all the units to view the street and beach. Also there is a garden court on the beach walk side and on the east side that significantly break the mass of the building. The character of the building resembles the human scale forms of a pedestrian village. It looks more like an undulating townscape than a single building. Vertically the structure reaches the allowed height on only about 40% of the mass. The top elements are penthouses with sloped mechanical cover roofs and extensive terraces that soften the profile. The overall project is in harmony with and in fact enhances the south end of beach walk by making this a pedestrian-friendly node along the walk and facing a soft building profile accented by amenities like the garden court and the pool. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The Propert? is located such that it has three street frontages, South Gulfview to the west, 5t Street to the north and Coronado to the east. The only adjacent parcels are located at 431 and 437 South Gulfview and are currently occupied by 2 3) 4) 5) retail uses under apartments. The nature of these uses is such that they will not be negatively affected by the proposed residential use. In fact, the redevelopment project will enhance the values of these adjacent parcels. The proposed redevelopment is important on this "corner' parcel which is a highly visible area of the Beach Walk redevelopment. The buildings and pavement currently on the Property do not "fit in" with the City's vision of the Beach Walk. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The use as residential is a more passive use than the overnight accommodations and retail use that currently exist on the property. Having the driveways located off of Coronado and adding a plaza area to the front of the Property with make it pedestrian-friendly along South Gulfview where it adjoins and becomes part of Beach Walk. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed development as residential will be a significant reduction in traffic generation from the existing retail and motel uses. The project moves the access to Coronado in order to accommodate the relocation of South Gulfview and the Beach Walk improvements. There are two proposed driveways, including right- hand turn lanes, on Coronado and excess parking (192 spaces proposed, 150 spaces required) on the site, such as to not cause any congestion on Coronado. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed site plan demonstrates the connection and extension of the development to the Beach Walk improvements being made by the City. As previously discussed, the proposed density (50 units/acre) is consistent with other redevelopment projects in this area, such as 430 S. Gulfview (87 units/acre). The project is consistent with planned and approved projects in this area and consistent with the existing building fabric due to its variation in height and scale, by significant breaks and steps in the fagade, and by the quality character of overhangs, arcades, balconies, Mediterranean details and variation in color. The stepped profile of the beachside townhouses and the penthouses enhances this approach. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The redevelopment project is critical to Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk due to its corner location which is a focal point of Beach Walk. The project is a 3 0 0 visual enhancement to this area. The proposed use as residential will have less acoustic and olfactory impacts than the existing uses of motel and retail. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The deviations requested allow a project that respects and adds to the image of Beach Walk. Without these requests the project would be a square box approach, and would be heavy in mass and scale. With this request the project becomes visually appealing and even exciting at the pool and garden court and significantly enhances the drive by image along Gulfview and Coronado. It is really a four-sided sculptural approach to a building on an important corner of both streets. The deviations from setbacks are minimal as compared to the improvements being made with regard to parking, open space, impervious area and drainage. The proposed project provides 0.45 acre of open space--twice that which currently exists on the Property (0.22 acre) and greatly exceeds Code requirements (.09 acre). The impervious surface area (0.77) is also greatly reduced from what currently exists on the Property (0.89) and is well below the Code maximum (0.95). Improved open space and the proposed vault drainage system will be a significant improvement to the Property, as there is no drainage system currently in place. Upon the completion of the Beach Walk improvements by the City, the setback deviations will not be visible as the project has been designed to connect to and be an expansion of Beach Walk. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The current assessed value of the property, per the Pinellas County tax rolls, is $8,018,300. The applicant estimates that the value of the property after the proposed redevelopment will be approximately $124,000,000. The value of surrounding properties will be increased by the redevelopment project. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Residential attached dwellings are permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 4 0 0 The Propert? is located such that it has three street frontages, South Gulfview to the west, 5 h Street to the north and Coronado to the east. The proposed residential condominiums are compatible with the adjacent parcels located at 431 and 437 South Gulfview and are currently occupied by retail uses under apartments. The proposed use will revitalize this highly visible site adjoining Beach Walk. The building is shorter than many of its proposed or approved neighbors. It is of a high quality design detail and finish. It enhances the value of all the adjacent properties and enhances the overall image of the beach by human scale features, fountains, courtyards, gardens, terraces and roof lines. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. [This criteria was deleted by Code amendment.] 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. As previously discussed, the site will be improved visually, by superior architectural design incorporating Beach Walk, and by drainage and site improvements. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. As for the City of Clearwater as a whole, the project will greatly increase the property value, thereby increasing the City's tax base. The project complies with the guidelines of Beach by Design, which is in the best interest of the City. As for the community character of the property, this location is critical to the City's vision of Beach Walk and use of Coronado as a main node as set forth in Beach by Design. The proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project will create a beautiful and inviting view for Beach Walk pedestrians with its townscape appearance, fountains, courtyards and will also improve the drive-by view on Coronado. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 5 0 0 Termination of Non-conforming Status The applicant seeks termination of non-conforming status, in accordance with Section 6-109 of the Code, to allow the existing density of 127 hotel rooms (95 residential dwelling units) to remain on the site. Section 6-109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status as a non-conforming use or structure with the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. See the proposed site plan. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202(D). This requirement is not applicable as the paved vehicular use area outside the building is less than 4,000 square feet. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. The applicant agrees to accept a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan with this request and will accept a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code. Setbacks Upon the completion of the City's Beach Walk improvements the reduced setbacks will not be visually apparent to passerbys, nor to residents. As shown on the site plan, the property adjoins an area which is proposed to be improved by the City as a promenade and plaza area with tropical landscaping. The proposed zero setback to the decorative architectural pavement will allow connection to the proposed Beach Walk plaza. The deviations from setbacks are justified when taking into consideration the overall design which will improve parking, open space, impervious area and drainage. The proposed project provides 0.45 acre of open space--twice that which currently exists on the Property (0.22 acre) and greatly exceeds Code requirements (.09 acre). The impervious surface area (0.77) is also greatly reduced from what currently exists on the Property (0.89) and is well below the Code maximum (0.95). Improved 6 • • open space and the proposed vault drainage system will be a significant improvement to the Property, as there is no drainage system currently in place. Height The proposed building at 100 feet is lower than many proposed or approved south beach projects. The building has four sides in the design making it appear as a little village, not a large building. The applicant also requests 8'-6" (from roof deck) perimeter parapets. The top elements are penthouses with sloped mechanical cover roofs and extensive terraces that soften the profile. Vertically the structure reaches the proposed height on only about 40% of the mass. Access to an Arterial The proposed access driveways on Coronado are the only logical access to the site, given that the property has the greatest frontage on Coronado and that the Beach Walk changes to South Gulfview. The applicant has agreed to provide a right-hand turn lane into both driveways as requested by the City Traffic Engineering Department. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. As shown on the proposed site plan, the project provides excess parking. The applicant proposes 192 off-street parking spaces, where 150 spaces are required by Code. The proposed parking of 192 spaces is more than double the existing 89 parking spaces on the property. All off-street parking is located within the buildings and vehicular circulation through the development affords an ease of movement for pedestrians and vehicles. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). The proposed project has been designed in accordance with Beach by Design design guidelines. We provide the following information concerning the height, mass and bulk criteria. The concept of this plan and building are centered on the node along Beach Walk at the south end, the notion of a neighborhood look, and the articulations of the edges, edges of the podium level and edges of the building. The addition of a connecting plaza to Beach Walk and internal plazas creates a village feel not a high rise feel. This is important as an interface to Beach Walk and to the courtyard of the proposed Adams Mark project. This could be a center of activity and beauty. All of the units still maintain excellent views to the beach and gulf while the building steps in and out along the perimeter. The building also steps in height even 7 0 0 though all levels are below 100'. This also gives a village feeling. Each portion of the building has a recess allowing courtyards or roof garden terraces. The streetscape along Coronado, Gulfview and Fifth are essential elements of the design. We eliminate many curb cuts and parking to provide central entries, gardens and street landscaping. The romantic historic character, Tuscany features and shape is intended to effect a low rise proposal with many courtyards. It is part of the classical Mediterranean influence mentioned in Beach by Design. The motor court entry on Coronado reduces the scale of the project and adds to the pedestrian feeling. The canopy of trees makes this comfortable for people and cars. The separate garage allows the edges on all sides of the building to have special relationship with the adjacent public spaces. The axial, recessed plaza gives variety and a sense of orientation. The Tuscany inspired shapes and colors lend human scale and interest in the building from Gulfview. The building insets at 70' and 37' intervals under the 100' maximum and the insets are greater than the 5' required. The architectural treatment, detail and glass exceed the required 60 percent on all sides, 64 percent. The maximum building height is 100' to roof slab from B.F.E. and the allowed elevator/mechanical overruns are coupling at 16' and decoratively treated. The applicant requests 8'-6" (from roof deck) perimeter parapets. The building obviously has 4 sides in the design making a little village not a large building. The townhouse "beach houses" in front add to this feeling. The tile roofs at the edge are not parapets but conceal mechanical A/C equipment. There is a lobby, club and fitness center just off the Coronado motor court entry. The club and fitness center are amenities for residents only. The interface to the civic space of Coronado and Beach Walk, and units with direct beach view were the master concepts of the layout. Colors: Casa Blanca SW 2060 Atelier Tan SW 2170 Terrain Tan SW 2177 Eaglet Beige SW2193 8 • Golden Gate SW2201 Sedona Clay SW2313 Impressive Ivory SW2333 Wrought Iron railings Glass: Ultra clear, umber frames Roof: Authentic clay tiles, rustic, earth, yellow/sunset Pavers: Brussels black limestone color 8/12/2005 3:33 PM 46256.110172 #348793 v2 - Canterbury/Sienna Sands/Ex to Comp Infill C7 9 Engelhardt, Hammer & Asciates Siena Salts Code Criteria Analysis -`"`=-= t ?1 , f - -..? Siena Sands Code Criteria Analysis --r,._-rte _ ?.? I^?'wyA ?; - Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates has been retained to evaluate the Flexible ?` - Development/Comprehensive Infill Proposal for its compliance with the City of Clearwater Land Development Code, its consistency with Beach by Design standards of development and its compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. The Land Development Code establishes criteria for review of proposals of this level. We have evaluated the proposal relative to those'criteria and find the project consistent with the criteria's objectives. General Applicability Criteria 3-913.A 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmonv with the scale bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed project of high-rise condominiums is in keeping with the. described character of this district. The subject property is located in the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Designation with primary uses in this category being "high density residential/ overnight accommodation." The site is located in the Beach Walk District of Beach by Design. Along South Gulfview there are several existing and approved structures of similar height and bulk. The property has three sides of street frontage. To the east is Coronado Drive with low to mid-rise retail, residential and motel/hotel uses. The north boundary of the site is Fifth Street. Properties north are characteristic of the beachside tourist retail, small scale restaurants and small motel uses as described in Beach by Design. Recently approved on the block just north of the subject property is the Americana Gulf/ Lucca Development project at 325 S. Gulfview. This development has been approved for-102 attached dwellings at a maximum height of 148'. To the west is Gulfview Blvd and Clearwater Beach. Adjacent uses to the south are retail with apartments on the upper floors. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adiacent land and buildinas or sianificantly impair the value thereof. Page 1 of 6 Engelhardt, Hammer & As dates Siena Sals Code Criteria Analysis The proposed development will further the goals of redevelopment for the area and increase value of the adjacent properties. Beach by Design recognizes that the motels and hotels along South Gulfview Blvd. are "showing their age and obsolescence." The current uses on the site reflect this description with the aging Travelodge Hotel and Red Roof Inn as well as a small scale tourist retail store. This proposal is a catalytic project for the entire surrounding neighborhood to begin the desired transformation of the Beach Walk District into a coveted address in a vibrant resort community. 3. The proposed development will not adverselv affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development will improve the quality of life for the neighborhood in terms of health and safety. The proposal includes 23% open space, an improvement over the 11 % currently on site and significantly better than the 5% required by code. In addition, the surface parking lots, that obstruct the redevelopment of the area and hinder its reputation, will be removed in favor of internal parking. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposal will reduce vehicle trips by eliminating retail and overnight accommodation uses in favor of less intense residential dwellings. Offering parking in excess of that required by code and more than double what is existing currently will aid in this reduction of congestion by preventing back-ups caused by lack of parking spaces. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. This proposal is consistent with the neighborhood character. Recent approvals similar to the proposed development in this district include the Americana Gulf/ Lucca Development project at 325 S. Gulfview, approved for 102 attached dwellings at a maximum height of 148'. The Adam's Mark Project at 430 Gulfview Blvd., in the Clearwater Pass District and just southeast of the subject property, was approved for multi-use development, consisting of 78 overnight accommodation units and 112 Condominiums with a maximum 149.5' height. Also just south at the termination of Coronado Avenue in the Clearwater Pass District is the Page 2 of 6 Engelhardt, Hammer & AsOciates Siena As Code Criteria Analysis Decade Gulfcoast at 521 South Gulfview Blvd. approved as a mixed use development including 241 overnight accommodation units, 38 attached dwellings and accessory retail and restaurant at a maximum height of 128'. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adiacent properties. The residential uses proposed will have far less impact on the surroundings than the more intense and sporadic uses of motel & retail in existence today. The design of the proposal with a garden court facing the beach, landscaped walks to provide interface between Coronado & the beach walk along Gulfview, and the shape of the penthouse units stepping down to the beachside townhouses all contribute to the shared views and pedestrian enjoyment of the site. Comprehensive Infill Criteria 2-803.C 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. Requested deviations to setbacks are consistent with the goals set forth in Beach by Design to bridge the disconnect of properties east of Gulfview with the beach. Developing the building at this location as well as adding to the beach walk and landscaping along Gulfview allows for the desired marriage of superior architecture and resort quality beach. There are no requested deviations from setback requirements to building along Coronado, only for the dumpster staging area. The unusual challenges of a site with three frontages more than justify the minimal deviations requested. The deviation in height allows for maximum enjoyment of the natural features of the beach walk area and allows for internalized parking maximizing the use of landscaping and open space. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Page 3 of 6 Engelhardt, Hammer & Asciates Siena Sa71s Code Criteria Analysis This development will increase the property value to an estimated $124 million from the current assessed value of approximately $8.02 million. The proposed project will add value to the entire surrounding area through improvements to the beach walk, courtyard and landscaped pedestrian avenues and grander architectural expectations of redevelopment for the beach as a whole. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The City of Clearwater Land Use Category and Zoning District encourage these types of high-density residential condominiums in their definitions for the HDR and T districts. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses; The design is representative of the type of uses that are already seen in this district as well as the uses desired in the Beach by Design analysis and the Future Land Use Plan. The project proposal is consistent with the mix of uses already established. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment proiect will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal will add value to the vicinity through extending the beach walk, creating off street parking, adding shared ground level improvements and landscaping and removing non-conforming signs, uses and lighting for an improved appearance. 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development will aid in the revitalization of the beachside community. Landscaping changes will result in a 0.77 impervious surface ratio; an improvement over the 0.89 existing and the 0.95 maximum permitted by code. The architecture will be of a scale and form designed to give the appearance of a small village community. Approximately 64% of exterior surfaces will have a glazing treatment versus the 60% required Page 4 of 6 Engelhardt, Hammer & Asociates Siena Sa11tfs Code Criteria Analysis in Beach by Design, aiding in the break-up of the appearance of mass and countering the impact of wall-like high rises. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking. are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole Flexibility in the design is justified by the benefit the new design will bring to the community. See Comprehensive Infill Criteria 1 for discussion of setbacks and height. The proposal does not require flexibility for required parking. The site plan proposes that 192 spaces will be provided internal to the proposed buildings, which is far more than the 150 required by code and more than double the existing 89. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. As previously stated, there is more than the required parking by code proposed with the new development. Two driveway accesses to Coronado will aid in reducing traffic congestion in Clearwater Beach and deter automobile use along Gulfview. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design -guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. The design complies with Beach by Design development standards and criteria. The building is tiered and glazed to reduce the mass of the structure. There is variety in the dimensional forms and residential styles within the structures, to offer the type of dynamic community desired in this district. Termination of Non-conforming status 6-109 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. Page 5 of 6 Engelhardt, Hammer & Astiates Siena Sa71?s Code Criteria Analysis 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(D). The parking is all internal to the structure and thus is not required to include landscaping. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessorv structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. The developer will comply with all signage requirements in the site design process 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. Not applicable. Conclusion: In summary, it is our professional opinion that the proposed project is in conformity with the City of Clearwater's land development regulations, is consistent with the Beach by Design guidelines, and will provide a positive benefit to the surrounding Clearwater Beach Community. Page 6 of 6 0 errs- ®? E a HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL __ __ ueunlreoacn ar.M ncTeu -- GRAPHIC SCALE 1i e?A@ uu ug l 'I FLANNIN s 3 DEVE_LQRMENTTSVCS LEGEND (Tro.) rrercAL ...?..?..? PRONG B9UNDART fJ }}t?? va Z 1' ®AANG TREE M ?^ 16MOV60 } J ? A ? P_ ® ` Q wrelm LARmD.P1 ARe,. F- ? t?' 1? GENERAL NOTES: p INC ENGINEER "DSCAPE ARCHITECT NENH ZAYAC @ ASSOCIATES 1 : . . A . ] 01 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST. SUITE 404 (.3 ?? GS SAFETY ARBOR, FL 34695 (]27]) ]93]93-9886 Bue ]2-9833 Fon 0. y? 2. PARCEL YI: 07/29/IS/52JB0/000/1280 > F" PARCEL #T 07/29/15/52380/000/1270 G Q PARCEL YJ: O)/29/15/52380/000/0]BO ?j PARCEL 11 : 0]/29/13/52380/000/0740 PARCEL Y5: 07/29/15/52380/000/0720 Q ZONING: T. N t T ^,1 3. PRESENT USE 121 OVERNIGHT ACCOMODATIMS u (T167 AC RETAIL PARCEL 4. DEVELOPED USE 100 CONDOMINIUM UNITS 5. TOTAL SITE AREA 88.880.26 SF/1.99 AC (IMMUOING 0.167 AC TEE SHIRT SHOP) 6. SETBACKS BE0U16ED 28805ED Q 10-15' FRGNT 445' MIN. (WEST TO BLDG) 4.75' MIN. (WEST TO SIO11.1.) ' O a ( MIN. EAST TO ARCADE) 14.75 1500' MIN. (EAST TO BIDG) p O 3.60' MIN. (Nd2TH TO BLOC) 0-iD' SIDE 15.W' MIN. (SOUTH TO BLDG) Z z G 10.00' MIN. (SOUTH TO PVNT) Q, ? r. ]] 6. 7. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 35'-100 FT ¢ F GS PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT 98'-IY FROM FEMA LINE TO ROOF SLAB z Ew F. 8. SWD WASTE DUMPSTER WLL BE LOCATED IN BUILDNG W OU 9. LIGHRNG WMIN PROJECT BOUNDARIES WILL BE ATTACHED TO BUILDING AND MALL BE SUBMITTED AS PART W FNAL BUILDING PLANS. d Cz3 U 10. EKISRNG BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS - 24.329.05 9 - 0.56 AC. 11. Nl UISRIRSED GRASS WTHIN TDCHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED. 12. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB SIDEWAUG AND LANDW-G TO MATCH EMSRNG CWDIRONS 13. FLOOD ZONE: Y THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE W ZONES AE (B.F.E.- 12') AND VE (S.F.E- IY @ 14'). IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRM No OF ME dTY OF CLEARWATER. T- PINEWS COUNTY. COMMUNITY NUMBER 125096 (MAP NUMBER 121030-0102-G). LAP RENSED 9 IENBM 3, 2003 . 14. ALL ENISTLNG SCNAGE WLL BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE REDEVELOPMENT. b WLL BE REMOVED AND PROPOSED 4GNACE WILL BE ATTACHED 13. ALL EXISTING S-AGE u TO BIOG. FACADE ADE ARO ADHERE TO CODE AMID 16. MERE ARE NO ENURWENTALLY UNIWE AREAS ON SITE. B 17. A 6200 RECREATION FADUJ IMPACT FEE IS WE FOR EACH NEW UNIT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS OR FINAL PLAT (IF APPLICABLE) W11CH EVER OCWRS nRST. CONTACT ART NADER AT 727.562.4824. ?_ . 18. OUMPSTER SERNCE SHALL BE ARRANGED WITH SOLO WASTE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ME ISSUANCE OF AN OCWPADONAL LICENSE OR CERTFCAE OF OCWPANCY. _ PLEASE CONTACT TOM GLENN AT 727.56249J0 ?w 19. ME NR CONDIRONING EWIPMENT SHALL BE PLACED ON ME ROOF. 20. S1E DATA TADIE: E&UNG: PRA: EETA(16? S A. TOTN. SIR AREA 86.880.28 9 (1.99 AC) 86.880.28 9 (1.99 AC) 10.000.00 9 B. TOTK OPEN SPACE 9.420.69 9 (0.22 9) 19.622.87 9 (0.45 AC) 4,-01 9 (0.09 AC MN.) C. BINDING FOOIRONT: 24.329.05 9 (0.281SR) 51,4X45 9 (0.6] FAR) - E. WEWAU(/OECK/FAWD AR EA5.3,130,54 9 8,622.88 9 - F. TOTAL ONPERMOUS ARFA 77.459.59 9 (ON ISR) 67,257.41 9 (0.77 ISR) 82.531.M 9 (0.9 5 N MAX) 6 ? C. P""" "ACES: 89 192 9PACES 150 (1.3 WA.Q,9/•Limp 4 H. VT311CULAR ARIA: 35.21150 9 a71382 9 - L WIERNIR V MAPE AREA 6.891.42 9 N/A N/A J. OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODARONS: 127 UNIIS 0 UNITS N/A en n 9n WArs 616) KVD WR/N}S lMR SHUT' N. NULR-FAMILY UNI15: 0 UNITS I UH1 59 UNITS (30 UNITS/ACE) 3 OF 5 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY ISSUE DATE: 08.1 IS /CND RA u ro m MLN, vex Wx. DRY -- @ 100 LBR r coMP.crm -1ED 6UTAaMDE T. vsx MAR. OILY OExgIY AND 40 L6P PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL NTS OT?R Cff All PLANNING 3 DEVELOPME, SPREAD o ?tP O m .?:w v? uowi ?` . opmr.es orarAwlwmw. ora x ] aF 11AE DRIP UNE ,,,, m 'rawer yg n ?'? BARRICADE DETAIL N.T.S. A-Yeewtm ry TREE PLANTING DETAIL „. r.B GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 3! I. Lwawrw eeaweb. Nm awa pbeWw erne. ar ,waaae, m we a. wrw awmaRr aw wwwY w- a ? wt aw.tn. Z ana b ?malwl..w w woC . I w a. o se q Nr rwao ]. p 1%Nia N W? ?4pea mW l5lugae Ir a Nunr PbnY' b H?neu?elr mt? l?wvaE S ? :?^ v j y y , m o : ? r. rr. w wy Eden ped rvan Um n wn.. . ? ? ' I ] h pbaReR awll e. ew m eeee. ew . Y. Ra?aa Ranrrmr;. wa tww:. AtlepYAw. ePwaa wadk.. rael:a. + ewlwmua :u m xo-lo-a lmw u. mw.ae<W?rr . Y em e /wv tl Iln ?l ? ? - w . ?p ; e . . . w w w ro lr,?? lr . !. IM dan? ro-?-we w Nr appwamaY prappaknr or /adorn: bf 9w^c mptubl conrUWq a M - N . ., J ? It alw I ae r e. a ?,m ?! oeA `a _ .etr nde q mpodry t Au pa+tmq o.ror Ndl .riw r ]' byr a cryrm mdcn. rNrn n m a wYrrd-m aRr b n. ? ,t 2 g t a e abwrw.cr T' wY°I'a.. u: pwn w'a'l'n°.?ce.i Arr. u./we?.em e.mw ce.wpb.. m v I .. Anr <.bl wl m.w1N wainwAme. Nad w rre„.tl e. war w ==w °0t « t m pw ` 'e' r , n ny a et : w wpb ':. .. .w qq a. r www IrM eimwb l %7 brNr Eee wb v Nr atutl YU cw84mr m Lu MU geMW= ewu a nw pwwn cpma.uw? rw la,,.. b npwL e°eau eb" I i" d., °.„°°on° t "w`m?er in.rb t eA e. mpa cwlwab. eI u. l,m. a/ uadaR. 1. i` . tf i la. mr Latlwaw ew?eaeAw wm er nrow.w. rw -xi a e«..an' ewEpad. wm:Y Na Ixw.. b pr+rm u..erA w wPn a w. van w Pea u. woR.aw,. rI. P n ma.nd . e. da ae .welRtl aew. aee.axed., eA .nmx Torn u. ,pad.PeP. wablwt b I ( ne q m .nurq d m,.nd.a <Iwrnw. ..m ,x ee Nw M dn c. rNIUd a w lk o u a t M/ u W b w w.a n > I er mneo, r p y w e v er w w c r aurr ne w . m ea (T T) TB]-BBBB J ? A N I). Tnrr all a w adaiWnr. arlNme w wOdxueonr xllnoN W rn,Iw eYwe•eI d Nr ernr. I R I t+ ] O ? ? y wm nd :) a,enw w 11. 'I"ap.gpea. wer eIA°n°we:. ? wrwlw. u .nwR. pant .w.:wwq /w a watl d lww ( . ? _ >+ W W l i tb Di d N ll ' wr b bNrww mplrr nrlab n. wwon e 10. -a tl q ew LNarmw Canwcbr w d w :pon.e r IimmNwe.M is ? arer. ? ? Q J t0. M n wrrMe M q L' t rP r r: mlolb,l Iuce•/w al Eb?imai cwt W ,n GI strwAl w 4w , p q r w va g pwpr r w w Y AT, a b In p.widN q pw inrldrxp con,wc,w wGrr gnr:nr rprdfady rbttl U 1M perae0en V w Ae. W cmevaW IdrN:RCalbn dpnr Nae a pwmletl w ,hr wriel navel M W wei.ct mUaneOa+ sgnr. Y J 10. EvIWp rpa rMll W rvnwM rr nrcrrwry b o®mmeY v. I.e.l%.p.. L) M, hr Twerp wirer tlwt aw G'rbNp Owlry IM Imarcaw ns,NaDm Nae M rrmddtl nN SL AuRwYn sNlw,:. xl. aw twVaelw r0 b nrpmddr rolbdnn, rvne.d. w0 pwor Obwrd a wY aw w wren. atl lr0 mnrp u. u.bmme a uY weirn p?n.. u. ul error aa.row wmY rqn, a Tar rrox e. raeatl. Q ? ? a q 9 a Z IRRIGATION NOTES a per, I I,.;eel„e warm. uwA wear. laar eewwar Y m pwPwtl a Q F U n e. w.getl aea xwaxtl q ty ereeae,v. aeauga z " 6 a N z coax 2. rM ?rvporrC ?ngoean SnYT mue< mM a ucwa W a k Gly rc o n R P e hl e R u $°I l b a J a I p .rwn wae a a w e .r e. a w a w w m, G... [,Tai 6 •] 3. Ielw,<n -t.. mua a Nro r and aaware q Lrndeew NdAYCt wbr m b' I w anwar r.cew ]-Ixm.t le Nb rl Dpr: cowwer. ana mUWr a wln wnr emr. ; .] 3 3L' .. rrbdbn a.-eJl aw.bRr, adN accvdW wa cl.my Y.wry w mewkeumr 9 9 e/w we.eWRwn, ma.A u wemutl Nr b /bel mwwaw aw aap.ae,r.. y } in lwarpaw Contnxlw mart wewUR4 w Nacrwt alb wrr wppry Ir Uw ? da Irrbpllw cwdra rdn w Gnwtl Wuaaw. e. inr /dle.InR I^kaee^ Mlrm w w^reU rAl M uYNr p wen mreMaeWnn' Iwlknr. 4 C Ui 54A Clmnlrp, Pnmrr-CvapevwANR FM,W Wa RARpE b Re'Mld 0 $bLkn MIaM Canty rlrmr 2- 1' Lywaumppnkun,mwbm row PmneRT-N wA>P B.eaPNw?,t.eYwPaw„a'.IxnT.Ra TREES TO BE REMOVED 32 A ewau.P.rw,erAY.mrcebyn..+aAL,,e•IAr, tae'ewAwl Rrl++ebN Iraq met. Rmmva a aAL, , nw, 2s BPrUp) vary,aau,xA•nt. '20 RBA RurrU&nw?mu,Rtl Rncnpbl RUaIML. Ie'Mpe•GC) •qtW towabar Wrwn,Sw Dnw6al}LL,TNTp'OG) `? r? ?• rA ?.Iwr pe.mlo.?`i w.mn n a +s ? AI Apr. 1$? tl ? ..rr PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY 1 5 OF 5 ISSUE DATE: 05.11 I PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. GRAPHIC SCALE M i=a-= tart HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL `f 'I ?- a ? -+ HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL GRAPHIC SCALE U v °r? 4 7 ? TE . PLAN! ,MC i, GEVELOPhiGVT SVCS p AXv OF CLEAPIJVATF 1 ? ?- LEGEND C ,. 6'X6nNG TRr< ro Ta wwNm ? ;:?gg? . Pwrmm wxas+s PAxnxc ? CRS r? ?? 3 c =:u? WTEgDR LMD3DMD MX. ? ? ??? -Z GENERAL NOTES 1. ENONEER/LANDSCARE ARCWTECT: KFJM ZA- k A55pFjATES, C. 701 ENTEM'PoSE ROAD EAST, SUITE 40s SAFETY HARB R t++ii>> w O , F. 34695 MP )93-9983 F%- (>P )9J-9855 F9. 0. > fG 2. PARCEL F1: 0)/29/IS/SIJ80/000/ 12 80 W P W ? ? PARCEL /2: O)/2B/IS/52J80/000/12 )0 PARCEL ? U . Q CCC777 6 O)/29/TS/SZJ80/000/0)60 PARCD 4 > T . 1 : 0)/29/t5/52J80/000/0)40 PARCEL 5 / : 0)/29/15/52380/000/0)20 E.) ZO NO, 'r 3. PRESENT USE 127 ONERn1GNT AC OOADONS V C.- AC RET- PARCEL 4. OEwLCFEO USE W cOND0 L. UNITS 5. TOTAL STE AREA 86,890.28 4/1.99 AC (IMCLUN G 0.167 AC TEE "I SHOP) 6. SETBACKS MUM 10-15' FRONT 5 15' MW (WEST TO B Q . LDG) l)5' MIN. . (HEST TO 90N.) 11.75' MIN. (EAST TO MCADE) a 15,00 NIN. (EAST TO BLDG.) ' ?' A O , J.6] NIN. (NORTH TO BWC) O-to' SIDE 1900 MIN. (SCL- TO BLDG) Z ' 2 C'" 6 IaOE' MIN. (SNTH TO PMAT) ]. ALLOWABLE uAk Ho- J.8-100' FT ? 4. a PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT 99'-It" FROM FEMA LINE TO ROOF SLAB ? F F W 8. SOUo WASTE .DMPSTER U. BE LOCATE. W Bu1LUNC 9. UCNt1NG WTTAN PROJECT BOUNDARIES WILL BE ATTACHED 10 3 BUILDING AND WILL BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF FINAL BULDING PLANS. co U IQ EMSRNG BU80WC FOOTPNNT AREAS - 21,329.05 9 - 0.56 AC. 11. ALL DISTURBED CRA55 WTHIM RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SOODEO. y 3 g y 12 AU- UNUSED DM4 WAYS MUST BE REMOAED -0 REP-C - CURB SWEWAU(. AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXSTING WNOIRONS F .i 11 FLOOD ZONE: THE ABOTE OESCRIOED PROPERTY APPEARS I'O BE IN ZONES AE (&F.E.- 12') AND NE (S.F.E.- 13' k 11'). IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRM MAP OF THE CITY OF NEARWATER, P,RETAAS COIWiY, coMAL Irv NuuB[R 1250% (NA, NUMBER 121030-0102-q YAP REW9D SEPTEMBER 3, 2003 L3 ` 14. AAL E-NG SCRAGE WLL BE REMOM AS PART OF THE REOEKIOPMENT. 7 18 ALL EXISTING AGE WLL BE R AND PROPDSEO 9GnAGE Wlt BE ATTACHED TO BLDG. FACADE ADE AND Ap(ERE To TO COOL b C • 16. (HERE ARE NO ENNROME.TALLI OWE AREAS ON STE. ? $; 17. A [200 RECREATION FACE S FEE IS FOR EACH NEW UNIT P TO tl - ISSUANCE OF BUxDING PERMITS OR OR FINAL PLAT ( (IF APPLICABLE) WHICH EN.R OCNRS FlRST. CONTACT ART KApER AT )2>.562.1824. $ k 18. CUMPSTER SEANCE 91ALL BE ARRANGED WIH SPUD WASTE DEPARTMENT -On TO THE - ISWANCE OF AN OCNPAIIOI A& LICENSE OR CERRFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. PLEASE CONTACT TOM GLENN AT ]2).5624930 - 11 THE AIR CONpROnWC EQNPMENT STALL BE PLACED ON THE ROOF. y- STFDATA EOLL EMLGL R A. .1 . STE AREA 8386x28 9 (1.99 AC) 86.880.28 9 (1.99 AC) 10.9 Y & TOTAL OPEN SPACE 9.420.69 9 (0,22 9) 19,622.9) SF (0.15 AC) 4,31AOI 9 (QW AC uW,J B aaa yk C. BUIL)ING FOOTPRINT: 24.329.05 9 (1128 191) 53434.45 9 (116) FM) - gs E SOEWWI(ADE"AIED AREA581 Xt 9 8322.96 9 F. RITAL WFFRNCUS AREA P,159.59 S' (IL891SR) 6],25).41 9 (0.11 158) 82536.26 9 (895158 44X) . G. PARXNC SPACES: B9 192 SPACES 150(1) sPAoC,A ) 44Y H. toICT.AAR AREA 35,214.50 9 J.)1362 9 - I. WIF m LANDSCAPE MEN. 6.891.12 9 N/A N/A A. OMERUUIT ACCWMOOAUENS 127 IMR 0 UN15 N/A O Wnd 9W F . 'M k15 B Po,y M K NULR-FAMILY U6R 0 UNITS I?3M ICYID lN0/A[}5 wm 00 ii$$ 591MTS (30 UXIR/.I(RE) 9rtET ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY 3 OF rJ IS SUE DATE: 08.11.05 uu? e5roAB4)I?[0 YAK DRY DENSm k3100 LBP CODUARfDSiABy2E0 SUBGWQE Ta 91K DENym ,ND cBR PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL NT. 02 0 INrG. DEVEi OPUE'A•'T SVGS I IRRIGATION NOTES ow.ue•. •+ «,b«a ero ti e M u^ ceeno<b.. ?. ? wn?ima?:e?a b :w.d.a «e «<.a.a b Eaw««. wavy w owde. ?aax ce,+?w.?m uaw. n?.a .?«` aw?w?w••n:m .T-ixw.c < Wa- t ao?. ;ro,?1n ?wi<M aw a<wM1 ewlry m aeu;<a;«. i -.1 e,-.1 w , Mw b rwI d•,oe<Uen aw o««te«c. <w «.in o".. o...m wb?'o<,ae<..^x em «-w .war tw b. PLANT LIST TREES TO BE REMOVED rt<p<d.wlaa'Aw..mvn icu, ?e+ii,Rrr<.<.a) rwiv?. Nery?«i y.i<'nc a nrv <'aveww v.r..,SO Cnw,.ia.<,xxiRncl GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES ;4T" ?«o.os ? ebM 9n„dPo Ca.eooiw arot Y«. aa?w eee,, e, reevaee. ,e pe:e, vewi:.. aa«e< aw wema. egin.n ? ? 3 ? ? claU mmlw, .b 0, Oepetnvnt a Ai?wbw aw <m,.mw Swdcr l wvm a vw« MueW Y.m.a aw StwWwf.?Nev.? rb'bn0°ny?, ta - .. t.l `f i v ? tbn, 9pG e. .wb« Im. tin. ?o bi^. dwfro Ys a aaw :. «cw««e ww u. ReitCO Mnwrm,.l, ww Gewr'e M,efeu«, a,pa..a p«ik,a :i I F '. .. '$ j ? ? f y tan, Z- .e ?, w a>^r ro erye. am r«.,. o r terw a ? .« ?.«n..Na, a b mw blme?. > ? ? ? ( ?-? f . w..p41« w a? «a raw dwi'.°r,"'ue.'w? <o..<d..<. a w wa«ew wv«m.. m u. ...x a e a•wwe«r E? ??? ?< ° ro.x.<e.me. •w a.bFa .a a..I. e «)tm «. b + ° ' p ` 0e' e I } " N e eo r <..e«.a .« .. « a u. «ew<w. .e:? « • n , F ` J Y . 4 r ? " ft?F z Z s. in. eax<«w +,m a r««e.?a. .w ..ean.N `?u u.m' "' o ea «<.e,.n> rsw.ee?w.. ?aeo?w.. w w «wa w <o-?awe. mm b ..<en rRnyb°.n "" ? ? _??. " ... ; ®a, iu<' wu.. c^.e.esa a.«•w. .a .«ew, +,m e....a .: <mwa <«w.,;w? rw ,ea.. b ,..e.+ . w w w. a u. bw+w• cwA<br a in. a. a am :-? ?E :. li' ? ? ? ry. ,o ` i° 1 ?"•,°w.,?5: . .<en<? t?.nm b ..w«<u. la ..<w?o m e.<«,e.r «EE<eN. w+.v e.a o<„,.. b o.rw., m: ° en w a as .« e.e r..ewrm,e.. r.<a,.,a . ab « .. ed , a ?ndA. ^ a. b. .? a b. ? A o W W mx wv,e u i . `<. TM KK`?e.<ro< bcw?.«w ,w w?weM.....„u,w. ae, ^.:.oub .e. , o«:ea d ..w. (iil ^?.w r,,,,, rm > a > p% ,? w Eem.mo. ew?waw a'o. u wro«en ?,w...a b..eeewe. aw,mo„e+. a .?wn«a' `mme?a.ti m u`"i0. a .W< ? ? > I- . 16. b .e1«tw'b u» r w«:i ???.w. ? ,^?iabu e11ew?•e ow < q t w Ce ` i fei we ? ` ww ? W ?, J i ? z . a W m w oe < u w i b .l _ ? ? ^enr ,bu w Inc ro.ueauu. T V i0. eb <an?new waurce4o. wu ,MU b ewnr.U<J m wel«t. <«qt .a M wei«1 wernwlan ,pv W '=`] W t9. E.:<ap ,eC ,«. b rwrone a, mwwory b a«a_oeoi. m. awawi. Q xo. An ..:w.v . tw a. a.bro« e,».w uw w««e« ^aabi.e, d^s b ,weabe Tn s,. A,o„•w swnbm . ^ ii. ac tma«? q u...mwt?o. a , ael«ai. mi«uea ,«.e.a. aw wo«. aiceow a or e.a m e.en. xi. wI w«. aawe« ..u:n M+ a r dwv ec ,oaa«. $ .p ?' ^p a O A• ?' 4 h .?• it+h •tl rn PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) 0 0 O 0 a z t w a a z F V w 3 z ? U I ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY I v¢E5 OF 5 ISSUE DATE: 08.11.05 BARRICADE DETAIL TREE PLANTNC DETAIL rw?u a.?..a an?.u N.rs. ..cs PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. GRAPHIC SCALE • 0 SIENA SANDS RESIDENCES CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA s R? s ti v 1] • SIENA SANDS • FLD2005-07068 - 401 S. Gulfview Boulevard COLOR PALETTE Terrain Tan TWT SW2177 Impressive Ivory TWT SW2333 Sedona Clay A SW2313 ?E ? ? ? !rv'a S 5 u l1 t < ?` p1} AUG 12 i'335 a J PLANNING $ OEVELOPMEN i SVC CMi 7 CLEA?WATEq BEACH lop GV G aww 00 to CoR?N?0 D PROMENADE wo SITE PLAN I NW NN6 1 11 = 201-011 1 p 8? w? Gillett Associates ARD? GROUP Aicharctmc • Phmiog s?.a . I543101 Scc5swd Stmec SaFI 342M %1-957-4151 Pax ndcaum Q e 02 o B W? vs oA ? o.pabN aoos m HAI N liili i "e7 ru."` A2.01 i w w „' IRS 10.LAmb t..Rl?.Id? is[ Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP Auhinxmte • P6amvg sm.en?.lmm 1541101 l-& Stec Saw Florida 34236 941 9415757-4177 941-957k151 F- 0 V 1 C Z 2 !!? r? v ) 6 o r ` g W u u fr?^ V J VU rosl = PLAN r¦ 7= _ IL-W !Wv1 1" = 20'-0" ¦ O O..?M...O. A2.02 Gillett Associates ARD i?OROUP Acchaenam • PIa¢niog 5.?..eama.>aam 154.1101 S-d S- A577 34236 7-44 941-9574151 Pa ddcmm L.] 6 ? a ? R1 W ? r? V J ¦ lgei W MI?i 1" = 20'-0" TM • oMww soon ?oka r . asx A2.03 Gillett Associates AADT OAOUP Aichioxmse • Plamiog 1543.101 Sand Saes 34236 S l dd •o•on, P u • 941A574177 941-957-4153 Pu v J ?pq 1?4 ? w o • W 0 V1v K4{{ M1?1r i" = 201-0" e aw1+w soa .WW * MX ?? spar ?a s-t A2.04 Gillett Associatrs AAD R?OAO:P As3i¢cnue? 1543-101 Second Saco S.a 5H--4.? 236 %1-957-4151 Pa 0 V J K. pr W V J V? ?i WOR PLAN . =- -F r 16{/ um 1 N = 2V-0" ¦ rte! ? OeY/CYM >t00i weta r ..s?..- !vi ?r r.r A2.05 Gillett Associates A ! I R UP S.su.•emi 1543-101 S-d S- Svuora, Florida 34296 941-9574477 441-957-4151 Faa dd?modc? {C/) X :) C 7 Z Q CC? Pf z 8 W ? r? V J irm IOYMI? 1" = 20'-011 1• ? QUAM1 J100f HONB T . MO A2.06 n#t r mumm 1" = 20'-011 Gillett Associates ABD«OROUp 1543-101 Sccwd Snort S2.-,., Floods 34236 941-9574477 941-9574151 N. ddedcwm V / P4 ? a w ? o w? ¦ #ON1S r . M'4 EM Al A2.07 0 0 Rt/WM KWAI M __ ..r 1"=201 Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP A 3too?ute.l?Mnn? Sman.EWmi.imd.n 1543-101 S-d Spec Sanaoo, Fbdda 34276 941A57-4477 941-9573151 Fa d?vmdt?vm V .J z V J z W V J ¦ r? O o.w1Ml.oo. . r ...`-0' SWOONS aoNINK ANKANIL? A3.01 • -0 ?? ? Ld PLANNING 4 4EVELOPWIENTSVC 1s CLEARWATER BLDG. MAMUAU LEGEI.1 n.w.?w..? ...?u?.s 0?0 a a o. a o ? ? Mw M ? F ?N OW_ NMW H.EY,41'tON TZA-r.? ill=20' 19 Gillett Associates axD?•GROUn aaLioecnne•rLnniag a.em-N4m3.7mdm • 7541707 Scrod Sans S Fl od 342M -ft, o . %1-9s7-447n 941-957-4751 F- ....... mow.. V J V J p? d M? o is W? cr ¦ m Z ooe r"= A3.02 ?u uy L? 'LANNING § DEVELOr'f ENT SVC C{T? !1F CLEAPWATE •„??.? BLDG, MAMIALS LBOEI ras.. ID: ? =,"a ?. ? nss?iaces ARDT GROUP N? Ac3l?e.Phnniog • Sow•lu.va.Imdee 1543-1015 and Sa S Pl d& 34736 mwti, o 941-9574477 941-9574151 P. 1 0 1 1 • •.1?1„ 1?11M ? , AA`` ® ®® ®® ® ®®® N® Je a IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII aka n W «a? ®®® ra a aa - ? ?B M O ow,l>rl,oo. ?? M"ArM CL eaua ...na• ..? 4..r 111 " 20' .?...a A3.03 N Q ILA 4 . 5UILIDING AFRE 4 T43I LATIONS SPACES UNITS ENCLOSED BLDG . TERRACE AREA (SF) GROSS PAWING LEVEL 1 52 32143 2434 TYPICAL LEVEL 2 28 11 32143 .2434 TYPICAL LEVEL 3 TYPICAL LEVEL 4 2$ 28 10 10 32143 32143 2434 2434 TYPICAL LEVEL 5 TYPICAL LEVEL 6 TYPICAL LEVEL 1 26 25 10, 10 11 32143 32143 2915S 2434 2434 2634 TYPICAL LEVEL S 11 29158 2634 TYPICAL LEVEL S 11 29158 , 2634 TYPICAL LEVEL 10 11 29155 2634 TYPICAL LEVEL 11 5 1928 1431 TOTAL BUILDING RESIDENTIAL UNITS : 100 UNITS TOTAL ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA: 285,215 TOTAL TERRACE AREA: 24,143 CONDO PARKIWa: 192 SPACES (INCLUDING 6 HC) • i • • Sienna Sands Stormwater Narrative The project is designed to provide treatment for the first 3/4" of runoff and attenuation for the 25 year 1 hour storm event from the project area. The stormwater treatment calculations are shown on sheet 4 of 5. The project incorporates a stormwater vault at the northwest corner of the building underneath the elevated pool. A detail of the outfall structure and vault is shown in the upper right hand corner of sheet 4 of 5. After treatment of the runoff, the stormwater is connected to the reconstructed Beach Walk stormwater system within Fifth Street. AU 1 L LJ V l? AUG 12 2033 • • Sienna Sands Stormwater Calculations EXISTING CONDITIONS: Description Area ft2 x C = YCA pavement 53,131 0.49 26,034.0 building 24,329 0.49 11,921.2 pond 0 1.00 - open area 9,420 0.20 1,884.1 Ceps = 0.46 PROPOSED CONDITIONS: Description Area ft2 x C = pavement 8,823 0.98 8,646.5 building 58,434 0.98 57,265.8 pond 1,082 1.00 1,082.0 open area 19,623 0.20 3,924.6 Cprop = 0.81 ATTENUATION VOLUME REQUIRED: Volume Required = delta C x A x I x 3600 delta C = 0.35 Area = 1.99 acres I = 3.6 in/hr 25 year 1 hour storm Volume Required = 8966.935 cubic feet Stage-Storaae-Perimeter Project Name: Sienna Sands Project Number: Designer. kez Date: 8t #5 Comments: (ft) (ft) (ft) Area @ Top of Bank(TOB): 3,620.0 Elevation: 7.00 Volume: 10,860 Area @ Design High Water(DHW): 3,620.0 Elevation: 8.60 Volume: 9,050 Area @ Design Low Water(DLW): 3,620.0 Elevation: 5.50 Volume: 5,430 Area @ Bottom/Normal Water Level(BOT/NWL): 3,520.0 Elevation: 4.00 Volume: 0 STAGE AREA VOLUME STAGE AREA VOLUME TREATMENT (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft2) (ft) VOLUME: 5,430 ft3 4.00 3,620.0 0.0 5.50 3,620.0 5,430.0 4.06 3,620.0 217.2 5.56 3,620.0 5,647.2 ATTENUATION 4.12 3,620.0 434.4 5.62 3,620.0 5,864.4 VOLUME: 3,620 3 ft 4.18 3,620.0 651.6 5.68 3,620.0 6,081.6 4.24 3,620.0 868.8 5.74 3,620.0 6,298.8 4.30 3,620.0 1,086.0 5.80 3,620.0 6,516.0 4.36 3,620.0 1,303.2 5.86 3,620.0 6,733.2 4.42 3,620.0 1,520.4 5.92 3,620.0 6,950.4 4.48 3,620.0 1,737.6 5.98 3,620.0 7,167.6 4.54 3,620.0 1,954.8 6.04 3,620.0 7,384.8 4.60 3,620.0 2,172.0 6.10 3,620.0 7,602.0 4.66 3,620.0 2,389.2 6.16 3,620.0 7,819.2 4.72 3,620.0 2,606.4 6.22 3,620.0 8,036.4 4.78 3,620.0 2,823.6 6.28 3,620.0 8,253.6 4.84 3,620.0 3,040.8 6.34 3,620.0 8,470.8 4.90 3,620.0 3,258.0 6.40 3,620.0 8,688.0 4.96 3,620.0 3,475.2 6.46 3,620.0 8,905.2 5.02 3,620.0 3,692.4 6.52 3,620.0 9,122.4 5.08 3,620.0 3,909.6 6.58 3,620.0 9,339.6 5.14 3,620.0 4,126.8 6.64 3,620.0 9,556.8 5.20 3,620.0 4,344.0 6.70 3,620.0 9,774.0 5.26 3,620.0 4,561.2 6.76 3,620.0 9,991.2 5.32 3,620.0 4,778.4 6.82 3,620.0 10,208.4 5.38 3,620.0 4,995.6 6.88 3,620.0 10,425.6 5.44 3,620.0 5,212.8 6.94 3,620.0 10,642.8 7.00 3,620.0 10,860.0 • •?eed5 • Parcel 07/29/15/52380/000/0740 Dorothy C. Boldog, as Trustee of M & J Trust .. _ ••v:,rat'+iwTiRrlllMrwM.i?wN?YK?.A.II.-e.: r • r (:? ? J• ? w ? 11?IV f R4T This Instrumuu Pr%wed 11y: RETURN TO: Ki C. ALLEN KYNES. JR. V Pic HARPER. KYNIM GELLER, WATSON A WFORD. P.A. 2560 t3utf te-Bay Blv4 #300 d( "L f Clear+eaav, FL 33765 00 AMT 6149/15572 .. .. ._. ?i't: . •L.. .w: _. r..._... srsO.i+..:.1'lrers:.?e:?wlo6.p•oir L)1 -I?1i i i7-04-1 1 27tp3heG - lAttf 7 it'4t .00 am W.Tt1RE1t , i2rt70.09 [71MBfa s4 m" LOO ?-2l93I JLY-w 6-1tf89 'J:??O?,, PlNEtL,/r a Joe?* pD 2809 _ THIS1. QUIT CLAIM DEED made this, ___ day of Jane.1999. 6ftwe Aworkam Gulf Morals Linked Pattre ablik a Florida Limbed Pare 4AIP bgehmfkr ulkd the • G wme ad..Dwptlvy Cs tloidoA sit rwlee of iba m a i T`ru Cdited October 13. 1990, with Ibp rwortvgre call mud convoy, whose pat office addrrss Is 6033 Crimson Coamy meLnn q&k InteinaRer called the "Grantee". twheaavar weed haebe, the tame "Grantor' and "Gramme k ckrde all of the paoa to r6is ia>atwnseL and. ow kakis. le6ab rcph tbva. arccasmors ad awivoofench.) WCfiT1 6B rH Thu the Grantor, for and la cotmidetation of dw a m of Ten Dollar (=10.01» and other vahmbia oowidwWoe to Grouter is haad paid by Gtamee, the woe4tt of which Is hereby ack- fno*k OA1ed bft*-d Md qukkirnsd a the staid Gin we asd Comwe's heirs and assign, io*h3 desaa iW property sitmroe in pbaeWw County. Florida: Lot S-Vwy- Four (14) and the North Tun feet (N. 10) of Lot svvermy.Flve. LLOYD-WHrrE.SKwNER SUso s2(7N. Acwwdln; ao the piss A".( as recorded ba Pit 9eok 13. Pmgea Twdve (12) and Thirteen (13). PeW Records of 1`6611as Cam mty, Florida. This b sort homestead property. TO HAVE and to HOLD the sane together with all mad siw boloafias a in wWwist' appertaining, cad all the aatatr_ ? tkmrewto whatsoever or Grarsor, tddrcr in law or egwY• for the right, title ishMrast tin. equity m le Wm hhse. b?.-nePA and pndit of the and Grantee farevcr. property Apprslaw'r Pared Nor Gr Z fi/r1,rt d d'a Ol2p ;07#,o Cteaaree t3aelaf 2iaerr ley N -.70 IN Wf'!'NESS wurk>EOL ;the Grantor has eatacd this hatrumeat to be asecuted the day ad yw? Mt above written. witnesses: t? Irhst seat C.. .. ?, . s Americana GulfMoeh Limited Partnership, a Florida Limited Partnerabip A., v). i' O G.?ae CLARA BOL.DOG. President of A F 'w lnvestmterh? ¢irpal Par __ ?csr;.ym7ielM a i i t .Rt\tttatraarat? STATEOF -• - tt)r p,**qyR COUNTY OF 1 HEREBY CERTWY Nit oa this day of June. 1999, personally appemrcd O& who _,L7is M not pernnally known to iw or om" produced • J . as hdeusification. NOTARY PUBLIC MY.Commbnim Expirac'_%l ii - J DesCHP 0n: Pinellas, FL Document-Book Page 105781609 Page. 1 pf 1 Order' 1 Comment: 0 . 0 Parcel 07/29/15/52380/000/0720 Canterbury Oaks, Inc. I#: 2004076696 BK: 13388 PG: 72, 02/' 004 at 10:38 AM, RECORDING 1 PAGES .$6.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $31360. EN F. DE BLAKER,.CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BY DEPUTY C . : CLKDMC2 nis instrument Prepared By and Return to: ?. Joseph Roback, Esq. FELDMAN & ROBACK 3908 - 26th Street West Bradenton, Florida 34205 REC.: $ 6.00 D/S.: $31,00.00 t 3 . Grantee's S.S.# I.D #07.29.15-52380.000.720, . ;" . (1103.4612) ti. ................................... .,... ..:.......... ..................................................................................................... WARRANTY DEED II THIS, i' RRANTY DEED made the day of February, 2004, by Americana Gulf Motels Limited Partnership, a Florida Lithe, Partnership, having its principal place of business at 401 S. Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33767-2508, o hereinafter called the Grantor, to Canterbury Oaks, Inc., a Florida Corporation, whose post office address iuV3 m It Clearwatei"•FL.I?kW,hereinaftercalled theGrantee: 401 S.Gulfview Blvd. t' -x,1767 (Whcrcver t4heiiw dte terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of irulividuals, and a the suec? and assigns of corporation) W X ?WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt W whgreof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee, n all tliafcertain land situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz: 0 Lots 72, 73, 121,122 and the North one-halfof Lot 123, LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 12, Publio Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 0 i SUBJECT TO reservations, restrictions and easements of record. 0 z a TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining and m easements of record. W % TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. m AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple, that the c Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land o and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except $ ad valorem real property taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2003. 3 S (CORPORATE SEAL) IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name, by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized, the day and year first above written. o ATTEST: ? Secretary Y Witnesses: 0 a ZY V c ignature Printed Namd Americana Gulf Motels Limited Partnership, a Florida Limited Partnership By: Americana East Investments, Inc. a Florida Corporation - General Partner By: -- t` ( .: a f' dl6 ci Clara Boldog- sident U Signature ?LG /E 5lgYAYAAI Printed Name COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF Y/Z The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of February, 2004, by Clara Boldog, as President ofAmericana Fast Investments, Inc. a Florida Corporation, asGeneral Partner ofAmericana GulfMotels Limited Partnership, a Florida Limited Partnership, on behalf of the Partnership, who is personally known to me or has produced as identification: VIA De-- NOTARY i iQBLIC n? y" SIGN:-- PRINT: 1 s - taorsnt..e p MY COM ISSION EXPIRES• Parcel Nos.: 07/29/15/52380/000/1280 07/29/15/52380/000/1270 07/29/15/52380/000/0760 Canterbury Property Management, Inc., as to a 95% interest TLS Holdings, Inc., as to a 5% interest . yy ?N•".y..w\.? .v .'!. ?<. s :;. Z ?. . }/;, isi? ?T2?•?2-.N'?v ,?'-. [?.j'` ?"e?Ir v: y°5. „3 ^ rLF,rw ^ ., *,' .l l ' , " ' • ' ?? •i• _ - _. _ •` S.. "'• ?. %Y.ii!;, : , T.y ; 'Q) ,t •? ?t ..?r T" l, ; e .. , . zG?. PJLZVARXD BY AND XX19tdf "r STARRY S. CLINQ, Raquire Macfarlane, Ferguson 4 McMullen 625 Court Street, Suite 200 Post Office box 1669 Clearwater, FL 33757 -1 Ll+0.OU NLRXAxrr 99-31!1'79! 2PT-39-ta99 4:47M PINELLRI CO 9K 10M PO '0"0011 s 1403 PnttiAs town, ne s 1407:36 J6 WMtHs 03 ptM I HS.04 !OC 6100 - Men 1 sN,30.90 WXJ 1tA,st6.46 + D9CK MIT.1mm'. 121,S16.00 owl It __„ aM +.M THIS INDENTURE made this 29th day of September, 1999, between ARM" ASSOCIIITzX1 LTD., a Florida limited partearship, existing under the laws of the state of Florida, having its principal place of business in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, Party of ` .the First Part, whose nailing address is: 421 S. Gulfview f = , oulevard, Clearwater, FL 33767, and CJ1NTRZOM Z P3topX=M ?_? '7auewss?t, XWC., a Florida corporation, of the County of Pinellas, -in the State of Florida, Party of the Second Part, whose mailing, 4 '?U address is0 2025 Rogers Street, Clearwater, FL 33764, 1#1TNBS88TH: That th* said Party of the. First part, for and in considera- tion of the sum of Ten Dollars (310.00) to it in hand paid by the. said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of the Second part, forever, the following described land, situate lying and being in the County of Florida, State of Florida, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. Subject to 1999 real estate taxes, restrictions, reserva- tions and .easements of record. Parcel T.D. No. 07-Z9-15-52380-000-0780 Grantee's Tax I.D. No. And the said Party of the First Part doer hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the sane against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. ,esaVion: Pinellas,FL Document-Book. Page 10673.1403 Page: 1 o/3 rder. 1 Comannt: I i le3CX ptlon: Pinefia ?rder.• 1 Comment: i t t E F1IMMLAS COUNTY FLA. Drr.RtC.9K 10679 PO 1404 PFIN WITNESS MUMEOF, the said Party of the First Part has caused these presents to be signed the day and year above written. AMUN ASSOMATLS, LTD., a Florida limited partnership Sign". Sealed and Delivered Hys Aegean Sands, Inc., a in Our Presence- Florida torpor ion By- (SEAL) Print -IM IJjVn Fran` s ftLt Q60-ML Print STAIR OF MICHIGAN cOuvff OF KMISTEE I HSMT CIXTIFY that before me personally appeared KMQMM a. R06MOM as President of A»(3>;AN SANDS, INC., a Florida corporation, as general partner of an=" ASSOCIATES, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, to me personally known or vho has produced Drivers License as Identification and who did take an oa to me to t e person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument , and acknowledged the execution thereof to his free act and deed as such officer, for the uses and purposes therein expressed. WITNRSN my hand and official seal at ?3? first Stmt said county and State, this 24th day of Sec?esEer 1999. MWAEL.Yh1 P NaTAA 1lLPt LCJ ?.ldl?2 YpUSLjd Notary Puslic oOUNTI; Print Naas I 1 AP,2-0.M01- 11Y Coiaxiss ern fires: n, Wrtw%ATRSSC%XDM1r%AWMX.Mw ,2- S, FL Document-Book. Page 10673.1403 Page: 2 of 3 ' ' a"asc.... •?+?:vt??3:??.?,o__r.,.:.,•r?:.?:w.n:rn?tko.?..-??.«-..:,::xr..'' -??-?i'}s?`= 2. . F ttnuts COUNTY rLA Orr JREC . BK IOM PO 1109 Lot 75 less ]forth 10 feat tbe"of aed all of Lots 76 and 77.t that rant of loot 122 of LLC=-IO[IYW-5KDOW 1VD2'i XCW. . __,?°•:.'. :?' " saaordisg to Om plat thereof as seoe"ed iia Plat 2aok 13, Papas 12 and 13, PubUA seaea?ds of Pinellas C5*=t7r, Plosida, daaribed as folloxst >tsfisaaitap at tha southeast corner of Lot 123, mad runlaLW than" aloaQ its saatorlr boaadasT 25 feet= !}rafter lkwterlr An a stFuigl+t Jim to a point is the MestarlT bownldary of said lot +?ie0n is 14war betwe" its Sawthwest =4 8610thw"t. ctoaaesej tkamw moutbuidr alroaf the Masterly bowWkmr of said Pats 25 feet, =ace or less to the &Mtkwext cower of nid lotf thewe Paataely aloes the Sande bo aAaxy of said lot, to the Zelat of Boglaaisapt Lots 124, 125, 129 cad 127, 1 -N=TS-sxmwm 151=91SX0 1. aec&wALug to the asap or plat thereof as recorded is plat soc* 13, pages 12 and 13, Public Asomde of Pinellas Oovntcr, T2erida: Use that past of Lot 121 bepimni W at tabs lforthwsst aoratr of said lot sad ruasing masterly 3 foot along the North bown"xr, thence Southwesterly in a straipat line to the sout*W"t Occaar of said lot, thence X=th along the MMtar1Y bwusla?a y to Point of mosiAmiluff. Lots 1.28 cad 12l, LTAM-1M?s-Y itMZ'YZAXW, &coo*" to the user or plat thereof as saooardi in Plat cook 13, pea" 12 and 13, Pub" io Records of 311nallaa County, Florida. DQGW VA '0 - >esaVdon: Rnellas,FL Document-BookPage 10673.1403 Page: 3 of 3 Wer.1 Comment: j ';Jf Tt i 1#:'2.004373400 BK: 13838 PG: 9, 09/21/2004 at 10:21 AM, REING 3 PAGES $27.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTIO 2505.30 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, ERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDM85 v2 ?• w u aSoS.3a _ s' ,25-3-2.-30 Prepared by and return to. Donald R. Hall Attorney at Law Goza and Hall, P.A. 28050 U.S. Hwy. 19 N., Suite 402, Clearwater, FL 33761 File Number: 8497-1Q ` . Will Call No.: [space Above nis Line For Recording Datsl Warranty Deed This Wa>ty Deed made this day of September, 2004 between Canterbury Property Management, Inc., a Florida Corporation whose post office address is do Red Roof Inn, 421 Gultview Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33767, grantor, and TLS, holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation whose post office address is c% Red Roof Inn, 421 Gulfvlew Blvd., Clearwater; FL 33767, grantee: (Wbinever.psed herein the term "grantor' and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heir, legal representatives, and assigns of Individuals: and the successors and assigns of corporok m, tows and trustees) Wittiesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the stun of TEN AND N01100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, a Five percent (5%) interest as tenants in common in the following described land, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof; Parcel Identification Number: 07/29/1562380/000/1280 & 07/29/15/52380/000/0760 SUBJECT TO a First Mortgage in favor of REPUBLIC BANK, recorded in O.R. Book 10673, Page 14%, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, which mortgage Grantee herein expressly assumes and agrees to pay. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2003. DoubleTinwe -PINEL'LAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. 1 13838 PG 1660 • S, In Witness Whereof, grantor hap'llerel td set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in ourprtsence: Canterb Pro ge nt, Inc. B Y. Witnc,/j?? ?Ine: t M n . Co e, ident Name: (cote Seal) ,IWf'o ftoing instrument was acknowledged befo thisday of September, 2004 by Martin R. Cole, President of Cauterbury Property Management, Inc., on behalf of a rporation. He `] is personally known to me or [X] has produced 4 vbr's license as identification. [Notary Seal] Notary PubliOR ? Printed Name: IXPIRES November 14, 2007 My Commission Expires: warranty Deed - Page 2 DoubleTtmee PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. 13838 PG 1661 • Lot 75 less North 10 ' 6et?- tnereor anu a-Lj w+ that part of Lot 123•, oj_-LLDYD -WHITE "BRnMR SUBDNSBION, 'thereof as recorded in. Plat Book 13, page. according to the piae, 12 and 13;. Public Rec6?ds of Pinellas. County, Florida, described as follows: thence Beginning 'at the,,southeast corner of Lot 123, and running along its Easterly`bQundary 25 feet; thence Westerly in.a. to.,:a,paint in the Westerly boundary of said lot shich Is idw. which ? midwa?y%,'between_its Northwest and Souof said to er25 thence south;aijy'•-along the Westerly- boundary Beet, more'q,`r`lban to the Southweaof csaid lot,stodthetPointnof Easterly-klbrig$ the.South boundary Beginninc,'i:• 4+ats 124, 125, 126 and 127, LL0Yhereof$asRrlNKEA in SIIBDIVI8Xjq according to the map a es 12'and-13, public Records of Pinellas Plat Bum? O3oljo ,r ; P ida,. g less that part -of Lot 127 beginning at the Northyisat corner of said lot and running insaes?r 3 aight feet along Count line to th9l;27cxth boundary, thence Southwesterly thej?o?thwest corner of said lot, ?thence North along the ttsoeiti?zly boundary to Point of Beginning. cordig ts 128 129-, Book 13acpagesnl2to -,-...the map or plat Florida. and 13, Public Records of•.Piuellas County, EXHIBIT A • 0 'T'ree Inventory - Red Roof Inn Site Clearwater.Beach. 6/20/2005 Prepared by Alan Mayberry For: Keith Zayac & Associates {I J UL Q 1 M05 ORIGINAL The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist, and includes findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and my report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of Keith Zayac & Associates Inc., and will not be given to other entities unless so directed. Site Overview and Canopy Analysis The subject property is presently being utilized as commercial property on Clearwater Beach. The tree canopy is composed mostly of palms and exotic trees planted to create a tropical effect. The dominant species include the native sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) and the exotic Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta). The only native tree species is the live oak (Quercus virginiana) which is being utilized to meet parking lot landscape code requirements. Maintenance has been very poor as palms have consistently been over pruned and oak trees have crown dieback. The palms and trees suffered from salt intrusion as the site was twice inundated with salt water from last year's storms. The effect is especially evident in the parking lot where live oaks, crape myrtles and several shrubs are dead or dying. With the exception of a small percentage of the palms, very few valuable trees exist on this site that warrants preservation. Several palms that are border line for preservation will show significant improvements if pruned correctly and fertilized. The inventory will provide specific information for each tree and palm on site. Tree Inventory Data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the data used in the inventory: • • ORIGINAL Tree# - location - Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size - Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.). Species - Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. Condition Rating - The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included bark. Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing energy. The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows: 0- A dead tree 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). A tree with a rating of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2 - A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback, cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed les tlap?Cb?le??s p l l U / J UL 0 1 2005 i ri.r NIM0 6 UEVcLUF=;.:, NT QTY OF ORWINAL • can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating. 3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5 - A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation. 6 - A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree. Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree. NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3-5 years. However, events such as drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely affected, have the tree inspected by a qualified Intern'b a Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist. AlL 0 i 2005 VPLAIV CITY gnFDEV711 SVC C? Lg U6?u L _ Q 2055 ORIGINAL E?IAIIAIn a .r...__ Note: Whenever possible it is advised to adhere to inventory recommendations when selecting trees to be preserved. For example, trees rated 4.0 and higher should be preserved if at all possible, while trees rated 2.0 and lower should be removed unless otherwise noted in the inventory. Trees rated 2.5 are generally recommended for removal unless remedial work is performed to upgrade them. Trees rated 3.0 and 3.5 are average trees that have good potential and warrant serious consideration for preservation but not to the extent that site plan modifications are necessary. NOTE: This inventory was performed on June 21, 2005 and includes every tree and palm on site that is protected according to the criteria of the City of Clearwater code. Tree Inventory Tree # Size Species Rating 1 15'C.T. sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 3.0 Comments: This palm has been over pruned. The crown is healthy and has an average appearance. The trunk has a slight restriction. This palm could be preserved in place or transplanted on site but will need proper maintenance to improve. 2 12' C.T. sabal palm 2.5 Comments: This palm has an anemic crown and is below average in health and appearance. The health of this palm could be restored by fertilizing to correct nutrient deficiencies and by proper pruning in the future. Recommend removal unless remedial maintenance will be performed. 3 13' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 Comments: This palm has a slight crown restriction 7' above grade and has been over pruned. The crown is healthy and average in appearance. Recommend preservation or transplanting on site. 4 10' C.T. Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 4.0 Comments: This palm is located in the street right of way of Gulfview Boulevard. It is a very healthy and attractive palm. Its appearance will improve if the loose boots are removed. Recommend preservation. 5 11' C.T. sabal palm 2.5 Comments: This palm is healthy but its condition is downgraded due to a P long gash on the trunk 5' above grade. The wound has not affected the tree's health or structural 0 ORIGINAL 0 stability. This palm should be preserved unless appearance is a high priority and this palm will not blend aesthetically with other site landscaping. 6 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 Comments: This palm is very healthy and has a full crown. However, it is located 6" from a building foundation and cannot be transplanted prior to demolition. This palm is worthy of preservation if not damaged during the demolition process. 7 Multi-stemmed (9) Schefflera (Schefflera actinophylla) 1.0 Comments: This tree has several stubs that were cut back and are now decaying. The tree is located close to a building foundation and cannot be transplanted. Recommend removal. 8 11' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 Comments: This palm is healthy with a full crown and a slight trunk curve to the southwest. It is very attractive and recommended for preservation. 9 15' C.T. Washington palm 3.5 Comments: This palm has an attractive crown but is in need of fertilization to correct a minor nutrient deficiency. Recommend preservation and treatment. 10 14' C.T. queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 2.5 Comments: This palm has been severely over pruned and has an under-developed crown with a poor appearance. The health and appearance of this palm could be restored with a fertilization program and proper pruning in the future. However, it would be more prudent to remove this palm and plant a new one. l 1 14' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 'romments: This palm has been over pruned but is still healthy. Recommend preservation with proper pruning in the future. NOTE: Palms # 12 -15 are growing in a row and have all been pruned to a 10 - 2- cut. (A configuration that causes the crown to have the appearance of the hands of a clock in the ten minutes until two position). Pruning palms this hard over time causes them to weaken and makes them more susceptible to insect attack or disease. These palms can be restored to good health and appearance if they are pruned properly and fertilized with a slow release palm fertilizer. 12 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 P ? F (? _0 -- :° AIL 0 1 2aQ5 svcs? ORIGINAL Comments: This palm has been over pruned but is still healthy. Recommend preservation as appearance will improve if pruned properly. 13 12' C.T. sabal palm 10 Comments: See comments for # 12. 14 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 Comments: See comments for #12. 15 11' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 Comments: See comment for #12. 16 4" golden rain (Koelreuteria paniculata) 1.5 Comments: This tree has severe dieback and needs to be removed. Note: Trees #17 - 19 and #22 - 29 are located in small islands within a parking lot that was inundated with salt water twice last year. Accent trees and shrub species with low salt tolerance located within the same islands have died or are dying. The salt has since been leached out of the system but the live oak trees have suffered mild to severe damage. The trees were already suffering from lack of water and the salt water intrusion compounded the situation. The trees that have suffered minor damage will respond if they receive adequate water and are otherwise maintained properly. 17 4" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 3.0 Comments: This tree has good structure but has minor dieback due to the effects of insufficient water and salt water intrusion. The tree could be salvaged if watered and maintained properly. 18 5" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree has good structure but has experienced 15% dieback of the crown. This tree could be preserved if watered and maintained properly. 19 5" live oak 2.5 Comments: This tree has good structure but has experienced 20% dieback in the crown. This tree could be preserved if watered and maintained properly. 20 14' C.T. Washington palm 4.0 • ? E ? ,;e i 0 1 2005 11 ? ORIGINAL ? Comments: This palm is located in the street right of way of Coronado Drive. It is very healthy and has a good appearance. Recommend preservation. 21 11' C.T. Washington palm 4.0 Comments: This palm is located in the street right of way of Coronado Drive and is a healthy and attractive palm. Recommend preservation. 22 4" live oak 2.0 Comments: This tree has experienced 50% crown dieback and the structure has been essentially ruined. Recommend removal. 23 4" live oak 2.0 Comments: This tree has suffered 35% crown dieback and should be removed. 24 4" live oak 1.5 Comments: This tree has suffered 45% crown dieback that has killed the central leader. Recommend removal. 25 4" live oak 2.0 Comments: This tree has suffered 40% crown dieback and has a codominant stem 6' above grade. Recommend removal. 26 5" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree has suffered 10% crown dieback but could be preserved if watered and maintained properly. 27 4" live oak 2.5 Comments: This tree has a good central leader but has experienced 15% crown dieback. The tree could be preserved if watered and maintained properly. 28 5" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree has good live crown ratio but has a codominant stem 4.5' above grade. The tree could be preserved if subordinate pruning is performed. 29 5" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree has good structure but has experienced 5% crown dieback. The tree could be preserved if watered and maintained properly. a L D L I I JI.- 01 2005 PUWNi DEVELOPMENT SVCS a_.....,.. Gf.F t 3t`? TG{ ........ . 0 ORIGINAL 0 30 30' C.T. Washington palm 3.0 Comments: The trunk of this palm is located in a very small parking lot island that does not have a curb, consequently, the palm has suffered scarring on the trunk from cars. However, the wounds are not debilitating and the palm is otherwise healthy with an attractive crown. Recommend preservation or transplanting on site. 31 25' C.T. Washington palm 2.5 Comments: This palm was once part of a four palm cluster that was growing together at the base. The palm has a 3' long gash in the trunk starting 12" above grade. In addition, it has a large gouge in the root collar where one palm of the cluster has been removed. The other two palms have been cut down to 2' high stumps. The palm has a lopsided crown. Recommend removal. 32 12", 11", 8" Schefflera 1.0 Comments: This tree has severe decay in the 12" stem that travels from the base to 3' up the trunk. Recommend removal. 33 10' C.T. sabal palm 2.5 Comments: This palm has been over pruned and the crown is growing against the adjacent building and the base next to a slab. The palm is still healthy but due to its location cannot be transplanted. This palm can be preserved in place but will need proper maintenance to improve, otherwise recommend removal. 34 15' C.T. sabal palm 2.5 Comments: This palm has a healthy crown but has a very narrow trunk restriction 1 l' above grade that compromises its structural stability. Recommend removal. 35 25' C.T. Washington palm 3.5 Comments: This palm is located in the street right of way. It has spike wounds on the trunk and numerous pits that detract from its appearance. However, the trunk is structurally sound and the crown is healthy and attractive. Recommend preservation. 36 11' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 Comments: This palm is located in the street right of way 2' from tree #35. The palm has been over pruned but is still healthy. The base of the trunk has suffered minor damage from a string trimmer machine. Recommend preservation and cea ' he improper pruning and string trimmer damage. F JUL 01 2005 PlANNlAIG & DEb'EL C?f.: rtJT SVCS? (, C.1 l_ f 1? J? 0 200 ORIGINAL ., 4 = & DEVE1. ME SVGS 37 14' CsIY Ur lm 4.0 Comments: This palm is healthy and has a very attractive trunk and crown. Recommend preservation. 38 8", 9" seagrape (Coccoloba uvifera) 2.0 Comments: This tree suffered storm damage and has several stubs present with internal decay. It is growing beneath the roof overhang. Recommend removal. 39 20' C.T. Washington palm 4.0 Comments: The trunk of this palm has a lean to the southeast and has an attractive crown. The palm lends aesthetic qualities to the site. Recommend preservation. 40 9", 4" schefflera cluster 2.0 Comments: This tree has a large stub with decay present. The crown is small and unattractive. Recommend removal. 41 4", 551, 5", 6" schefflera cluster 2.0 Comments: This tree has a small area of decay in the base. The schefflera has weak wood and decay typically progresses and ultimately causes structural problems. In addition, the 5" diameter trunk has a large wound on the south side of the trunk with internal decay present. Recommend removal. 42 8", 6", 5" schefflera cluster 1.5 Comments: This tree has severe decay at the base. In addition, it has a codominant trunk at the base with included bark. It is structurally weak and should be removed. 43 7, 8", 9" schefflera cluster 2.0 Comments: This tree has basal codominant trunks. In addition, it has decay at the base and in some of the stems. It is structurally weak and should be removed. 44 13' C.T. Washington palm 4.0 Comments: This palm is healthy and has a very attractive crown and overall appearance. Recommend preservation in place or transplant on site. 45 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 Comments: This palm is growing in the street right of way of Coronado Drive. The crown has been over pruned but it is still healthy. The fronds are growing into the i d ORIGINAL overhead utility wires but will eventually grow past the wires. The palm could be preserved but will need to be maintained properly to stay healthy. 46 30' C.T. Washington palm 3.0 Comments: This palm is located in the street right of way in between two sidewalk sections. The palm has some scarring on the trunk that detracts from its appearance. The crown is healthy but the trunk is against the over head utility wires. This palm should be removed if the wires are staying, otherwise the palm could be preserved. As this palm is located on public property, contact the City's Right of Way Maintenance Division (562- 4950) if removal is needed. 47 30' C.T. Washington palm 3.5 Comments: This palm is healthy and has an attractive crown. The outer trunk has sloughed off in some areas but the trunk is structurally sound. Recommend preservation or transplanting on site. 48 30' C.T. Washington palm 4.0 Comments: This palm is very healthy and has a good overall appearance. Recommend preservation in place or transplanting on site. 49 13' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 Comments: This palm is healthy and attractive. Recommend preservation in place or transplanting on site. 50 13' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 Comments: This palm is essentially identical to tree # 49 and should be preserved together in place or transplanted on site. r-ra 1' z Y R S k 7/1/2005 Receipt #: 1200500000000006169 11:45:38AM Date: 07/01/2005 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2005-07068 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Ch k CANTERBURY PROP MGT INC R D 5660 I P 205 1 00 ec _ n erson , . Payment Total: $1,205.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 $l? Date Received: 07/01/2005 SIENNA SANDS ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: UNK ORIGINAL FLD2005-07068 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD PLANNER OF RECORD: I w w CLWCoverSheet 0 .0 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT PosT OPrlcr Box 4748, CLEARWATrR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SrRV1C1?s I3li1LDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLr AvIiNUr, CITARWATGR, FLORIDA 33756 'n,11PHONT: (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RAN'Gr PLANNING Drvr1.OPMrNT RrvlrW November 21, 2006 Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Armstrong: On November 21, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard shall be submitted by March 20, 2008. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationAGulfview S 0401 - 0421 Siena Sands (7) - ApprovedlGulfview S 401 - 421 CDB Time Extension Development Order 11.21.06doc I'RANK I IMIJARD, MAYOR om? Doirn,w, Cc?I: aL?n;au+i;R 11O)T I IANIII.]ON, CO( NCI IAI EM BIT' 13iLi. JONSON, CUi,N(:IL.SIHlIBI:R CARLEN A. PPrr•.RSe?, CIx NciLMP.MBIT' 'T'Q1JAI, EMPLOYMENT AND APPIRN1AlNP: Ac:TIO N 1',UI11.0) FR" Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 10:52 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07068, 401, 411 and 421 S. Gulfview Blvd and FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022, 430 S. Gulfview Blvd Jayne - Attached are the memorandums regarding the time extension requests for the above referenced cases for the November 21, 2006, CDB meeting. Wayne Gulfview S 401 - ;ulfview S 430 Time 421 Time Exte... Extension ... 0 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & Buts, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RYAN C. GRIFFIN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.* SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIH-PIN LU* MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE BRETON H. PERMESLY F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS KIMBERLY L. SHARPE JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO.46256.110172 Via Email and Hand Delivery Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 November 7, 2006 Re: 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Case No. FLD2005-07068 Dear Michael: On behalf of the applicant and property owners, Canterbury Oaks, Inc., Canterbury Property Management, Inc. and Nikana Holdings, LLC, we hereby request an additional extension of the time to initiate a building permit for the referenced project, for a period of one-year, to March 20, 2008. As set forth in the amended development order, you previously granted a six-month extension to March 20, 2007. The reason for this request for the additional extension is that the development of the project has been delayed due to deteriorating market conditions. We understand that this request for extension must be reviewed by the Community Development Board In accordance with Section 4-407 of the Clearwater Community Development Code. Please schedule this matter for the November 21, 2006 CDB meeting. If you need any additional information in order to set this matter for hearing, please contact my legal assistant, Jayne Sears, or me as soon as possible. CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 V NOV 12006 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C:-" 149WATER TAMPA OFFICE 403 EAST MADISON ST. SUITE 400 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-1100) TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 i ! JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Michael Delk, AICP November 7, 2006 Page 2 We thank you and the Board for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ;C/ E. D. Armstrong III EDA/js cc: Mr. Martin R. Cole #389216 v1 r C ITY OF C LEARWATE R t`=a; PIANNING DEPAR'T'MENT °? jq.?ERCt1 ,U? Pos'r orru:r Box 4748, G.I:nkwA'rrai Fl.ofilnn 33758-47 8 MUNICIPAL Sl,wicl:s BuILDING, 100 Soul-fl MYR'1'u. Avl:N(:I:, CLEARWATF.R, RoRIDA 33756 TIiLETHONI: (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIANNING Df?vIiLOPMI.NT RI?VII?W June 20, 2006 Mr. Martin R. Cole Canterbury Property Management, Inc. 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33767 RE: FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Cole: On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request. This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. Since the approval of this project the Code requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per unit. Since the Minor Revision process was recently approved on June 6, 2006, the plans approved only included 199 parking spaces for the 100 dwelling units in the project (where 200 parking spaces would now be required). We are in receipt of revised plans from your architect now showing a total of 201 parking spaces to be provided. This revised plan now meets the new Code parking requirement. FItANK I XM i. IM, i\I:\l M J( )I IN IN MAN, (:ut? N(AIAIr:AWK I IUl"I' Ihmll:r( )N, Cc irncal.?tr.?tltr:r; Iin.L Jc ?tiux, (:c,I \c11.w:>u4ra ® C: A. 111:11 V 'i:\. (:()I U:Il.mi:NllSl li,?n i.cnitr, FQI;AI. E.NtiIiM.MENI ANI) Arrm,>t,nlvi: Ac:tutN, June 20, 2006 Cole - Page Two On June 8, 2006, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited the problem of changing architectural firms, the process of revising plans through the Minor Revision procedure that was recently completed on June 6, 2006, construction costs affecting the design of the project, coordination of issues of construction scheduling interfacing with the City's Beach Walk project and economic conditions that have slowed sales of units. Since the approval of this project, Section 6-109.B of the Code has been amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use, which affects this project. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. In considering the above changes to the Code, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension to March 20, 2007, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard. Site and building plans to be submitted to obtain building permits to construct the approved improvements will need to reflect the provision of at least 200 parking spaces for this 100-unit attached dwelling project, in addition to those items listed in the Minor Revision Development Order of June 6, 2006. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above; whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications IGulfview S 0401 - 0421 Siena Sands (T) - ApprovedlGadfview S 401 - 421 Time Extension Development Order 6.20.06doc SITE PLAN 1 LEVEL-1 (PARKING / LOBBIES) C L ?- a as L w A2.01 J--. 0 PARKING PLAN 1 LEVEL-2 (PARKING/VILLAS/LOBBIES) awe r• -2 / r 0 Q Q? W_ A2.02 ' (IiJCL ? 3 t}, G .PAR-Ka+?1 ?•) -?` _ _? ? I RED ROOF INN I I 421 S. Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, FL 33767 Tel: (727) 447-3464 Fax: (727) 446-7169 June 8, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida, 33756 Re: Siena Sands -Development Order Case No. FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard as amended by Development Order Minor Revision Letter dated June 6, 2006 Dear Mr. Delk Please accept this letter as my request for a 1-year extension for the above referenced Development Order for the Siena Sands Project on Clearwater Beach. This request is based on the land development code section 4.04 and the specific criteria for our request is as follows: 1. We have changed architectural firms and have had to go through the minor revision process that has was just completed on June 6, 2006. 2. Due to increase in construction costs, architectural construction drawings are taking me a little longer than normal as we work to keep our costs in line while still maintaining my commitment to quality. 3. We have been participating with, and are still in the process of working with, the Clearwater Engineering Department in coordinating certain issues as they relate to beach walk and how those issues will interface with our construction scheduling. 4. Economic conditions have changed and bank requirements are now in the 75% pre-sale range. Sales are slower than expected. Should you require any additional information, please contact me and I will see that you receive whatever information you may require. Thank you for your hel in th' in Martin R. Cole Property O r/ Applicant Canterbury Property Management, Inc., et al ACCOR 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Hunraf@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:12 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: Joe Burdette - Re: Sienna Sands Parking In a message dated 6/13/2006 4:48:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, michael.delk@MyClearwater.com writes: Joe - We had caught that but were optimistic they could find room for one more space to ad. Hope the letter was satisfactory. michael -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 2:45 PM To: Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne Cc: Chaddy@CGHJArchitects.com; MRCole27@aol.com Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Sienna Sands Parking Michael and Wayne I just talked to the architect and they gave me the wrong number in saying there were 206 parking spots in Sienna Sands. there are 199. Chaddy from Curts, Gains and Hall will email you a PDF file tomorrow, before noon, showing one additional space for 200. She is just going to send you the one garage floor and I hope that will be sufficient for the extension request. We are in a tight bind with the lender and they are asking us for everything under the sun. Joe Mike I apologize, the 206 number. That is what the architect gave me... and yes, we sent you and Wayne a PDF File of the first two levels showing 201 spots.... Thanks for all your help on this one... the bank's lawyer is driving me to drink... fortunately it was not a long drive! Joe 6/14/2006 F" 1 • . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Hunraf@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 2:45 PM To: Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne Cc: Chaddy@CGHJArchitects.com; MRCole27@aol.com Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Sienna Sands Parking Michael and Wayne I just talked to the architect and they gave me the wrong number in saying there were 206 parking spots in Sienna Sands. there are 199. Chaddy from Curts, Gains and Hall will email you a PDF file tomorrow, before noon, showing one additional space for 200. She is just going to send you the one garage floor and I hope that will be sufficient for the extension request. We are in a tight bind with the lender and they are asking us for everything under the sun. Joe 6/13/2006 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Chaddy Hanwisai [Chaddy@CGHJArchitects.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 3:17 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael; Hunraf@aol.com; MRCole27@aol.com; Chuck Jones Subject: Siena Sands - revised parking Mr. Wells, Per Joe Burdette, please see the attached documents. I have revised Level 1 and Level 2 parking spaces. The new layout now indicates 201 parking spaces with seven handicap spaces distributed on each level. Please let me know if you have further questions regarding Siena Sands. Thank you, Chaddy Chaddy Flanwisai, AAIA Curts Gaines Hall Jones Architects ............................_...... ............_......................................._................. a: 121_ L. 6th Avenue 'Pampa, FL 33605 P: 813228.8000 F: 813.228.0770 e: chaddy(qegliareli.i.tects.com. 6/13/2006 u_ o z w - s h U NI-M SITE PLAN , LEVEL-l (PARKING / LOBBIES) A =" A2.01 o _? L z Q ? o L W 2 is II I: PARKING PLAN LEVEL-2 (PARKING/VILLAS/LOBBIES) A\ 1 ?., u±sD O 13/6-u ?J C*{ ?w oq meow" A2.02 S?Lei T Line Items: Receipt #: 1200600000000006068 Date: 06/13/2006 6/13/2006 3:13:23PM Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid • -ZLTR Zoning Verification Letter - 50.0000 @ $1.0000 010-341405 50.00 Line Item Total: $50.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Cash MARTIN COLE R_D In Person 50.00 Payment Total: $50.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt 0 0 CITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr Orru:r: Box 4748, CLEARWAlEk, Fi.oRIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100SounIMvtrru:AvENUH,CLEARWATER,FLbmfM33756 T1,1,1:1,110NH (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DE ELOI iMEN-r REVU;w sM June 13, 2006 Joe Burdette Owners Representative for Siena Sands 618 Pineland Avenue Belleair, FL 33756 Re: FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Burdette: On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 15 conditions the above referenced case. On June 6, 2006, the Planning Department issued a Development Order approving a changed design for this project as Minor Revisions, in accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Community Development Code. This June 6, 2006, letter outlined additional changes necessary to be shown on site plans and building plans when submitting for building permits. No additional public hearings are required. Should you have any additional questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at (727) 562-4504. Sincerely, LI& CA4d J Michael De1k, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlCD MFLET (FLD)lInactive or Finished Applications lGulfview S 0401 - 0421 Siena Sands (T) - ApprovedlLetter to Joe Burdette re Minor Revisions 6.13.06.doc kkANK I1MB\rn, -\i:MMr, )()]IN 1)()KAN, Cui NCIL I::\11M.k I IM I I IANIII. N, CAM Mcu.>n;?nsr:r. liii.i. ?c i. tiu , (:nr, cu.>n >nser, ® (: V:I :\A. 1'1:1 r.rsr:\. CO[ M 11 Nir.>ntr.r „Fyi::A1. I•:,m r m \I I:\ I ,\.,xu Arriral:? rn,!: Acru N Fm 'I m r:r,. • Pullin, Sharon From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:32 AM To: Pullin, Sharon Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Sienna Sands 0 Page 1 of 1 Sharon - Can you find a copy of the May 3 letter please so I can revise and reissue it. Thanks! michael -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:29 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Sienna Sands Michael I need a favor. The lender for the Sienna Sands project has an attorney that is a pain in my butt. What I need from you is another "zoning letter" saying that there are no more public hearings required for Sienna Sands. That all we have to do is comply with the conditions of the original D.O. and the amended D.O. (things that were in the minor revisions letter you just approved) on our construction drawings. We got a letter from you once before on this same issue on this same project. The letter was dated May 3, 2006, but it was subject to the clarifications and modifications (which we submitted after that letter) being acceptable to you and that is what the lender needs clarified now. The new letter needs to say that the clarifications and modifications in the May 3, 2006 zoning letter were acceptable to you as evidenced by the approval letter you just gave us and that there are no more public hearings required. Unfortunately, I need to get this very quickly. Is there any possibility that I could get that in the next day or so in order to get it to the lender for their Thursday loan committee meeting? I know there is another $50.00 charge and believe me, that is more than acceptable to the borrower. Sorry for all this hassle, but attorneys can be such idiots. Joe 6/13/2006 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 7:13 AM To: 'Hunraf@aol.com' Subject: RE: Siena Sands, 401 - 421 South Gulfview Blvd. I am confirming that the attached letter had the additional requirements (Engineering comments) #8 and #9. You can throw out the older version with only seven requirements in it. -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:11 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: Siena Sands, 401 - 421 South Gulfview Blvd. In a message dated 6/6/2006 3:30:52 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com writes: Joe - Attached is the Development Order for the Minor Revision for the above referenced project. The original will be mailed to you (unless you would like to come pick it up - let me know). Wayne <<Gulfview S 401 - 421 Minor Revisions Letter 6.6.06.doc>> Wayne I assume this is the one that has the added conditions as it was after our meeting ... please confirm that for me Joe 6/7/2006 C ITY OF C LEARWA'TE R r<; PLANNING DEPARTMENT A1.E? ??? Pos-r Orrua: Box 4748, Cu.iARwxi'i ir, Fi.ofuDA 33758-4748 'o. ° MUNICIPAL. Si imcis B(AIDING, 100 SounI Mvtrn.i:Avt:.Ni,i:, CLEARWATI-T, FLORIDA 33756 Tra.rP1 10Nr (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGG PLANNING DL3VBLOPiMENT RL:vu:w Joe Burdette Owners Representative for Siena Sands 618 Pineland Avenue Belleair, FL 33756 Re: Development Order - Minor Revision FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Burdette: June 6, 2006 On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 15 conditions the above referenced case, which was for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. A proposal has been submitted to revise the approved site and building plans with the following: 1. The six-story parking garage has been eliminated and replaced with two levels of parking generally dispersed over the entire property. This reduces the parking garage in the southeast portion of the site from six stories to two stories. This also increases the parking garage generally elsewhere from only the ground level to two levels. 2. Due to the change in the number of parking levels, dwelling units formerly located on the Level 2 have been relocated to upper floors, with the exception of six one-story villas located on the west side of Level 2. These villas have access via stairs and elevators to the amenities located on Level 3 and have individual stair access to the ground level. Three townhomes on the west side have been redesigned as part of the overall unit layout. Dwellings on Levels 3 through 10 continue to be located in the same general location and layout, with a separation between portions of the building at Level 8. The overall appearance is generally consistent with that approved by the CDB. DRANK I I11MAM), iINIA)( R JOIIN Ikrn,:??, C)c M: IAWNIM:r. I IM] I IA?ui:rox. Curnc:n.>m:>nir:r lin.i.Jc atici?, (:( :,NCILVENHWr ® CAKI I:x A. PHF.RSRN, ("()I N010101111:111 „Ir(N AL FNIIIi 1) -NIFNI ANA) AFFIR.UA f1\T Ac: nc 1N I?;MPI.M VIC 0 0 June 6, 2006 Burdette - Page 2 3. The pool previously located on Level 2 at the northwest corner has been relocated to Level 3 more central to all units on the west side of the building. Amenity rooms are centrally located on Level 3. 4. Setbacks originally approved are maintained or exceeded, even with the revised building design. 5. Driveway locations on Coronado Drive generally are maintained in the same location as the approved plan. In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be a minor revision and are approved. These minor revisions must be shown on the site plans and building plans when submitting for building permits, with the following additional changes from the plans submitted May 17, 2006, and approved under this Minor Revision: 1. Sheet A2.01 - a. Relocate the sidewalk shown on the subject property paralleling the north property line to be within the right-of-way of 5`h Street; b. Ensure the sidewalk adjacent to the front property line of South Gulfview Boulevard is the required width; and c. The location and amount of sidewalk adjacent to the south and southwest portions of the building will be determined at time of building permit, to provide maximum planting area while ensuring the provision of required egress. 2. Both the west and north elevations fail to show the stairwell for Villas 4, 5 and 6 on Level 3. 3. Sheet A2.02 - Same comments as for Sheet A2.01 above. 4. Sheet A2.03 - a. There are two Unit 12's. Revise southwest unit to Unit 11; b. Relocate the 15-foot setback dimension from the northwest corner (where it doesn't indicate much) to the northeast portion of the building to indicate the dimension from the front property line of 5`h Street to the unit walls; and c. Dimension the width of balcony projections (to not exceed two feet) for Units 1, 11 and 12. 5. Sheets A2.04 and A2.05 - Same comment as comment 4c above. 6. Sheet A3.01 - Decorative aluminum entry gates for the villas are indicated facing South Gulfview Boulevard, which, according to the design indicated on Sheet A2.01, these entry doors face north or south (not west). 7. Elevations - The exterior colors submitted are conceptually acceptable, with the potential exception that the colors need to fall within the Beach by Design list where the darker color may need to be lightened. I could not locate color "D - Sedona clay." Will need to submit color samples/chips with building plans for approval. 8. A stop bar shall be provided at the base of the down ramp on the first floor. This will force vehicles coming down from the second level to stop before entering the drive aisle on the first floor. 9. The proposed parking spaces along 5th Street shall be coordinated with the Beach Walk plans. As these spaces will be located in the public ROW, they may be removed or modified by the City at any time with no compensation to the Siena Sands developer. • June 6, 2006 Burdette - Page 3 • Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, P Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentI C D BIFLEX (FLD) Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S0401 - 0421 Siena Sands (T) - Approve&Gulfview S 401 - 421 Minor Revisions Letter 66.06doc Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:30 PM To: Joe Burdette (E-mail) Subject: Siena Sands, 401 - 421 South Gulfview Blvd. Joe - Attached is the Development Order for the Minor Revision for the above referenced project. The original will be mailed to you (unless you would like to come pick it up - let me know). Wayne Gulfview S 401 - 421 Minor Rev... 1 4v?Q"Q 0; Sfi lO April 20, 2006 Revisions Needed to Siena Sands Plans - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Blvd. 1. Sheet A2.01 - a. Demonstrate how a vehicle enters and exits parking spaces 108 and 109 without backing into the north/south drive aisle. Additionally, it is unclear whether the wall adjacent to parking space 108 (north side of the down ramp) is a full height solid wall restricting driver visibility for spaces 108 and 109. Jb. Parking spaces 26 and 40 require the drivers to back out "blind" due to the adjacent solid walls. Parking space 26 is in a very vulnerable location due to its location in proximity to the main exit to Coronado Drive. Either eliminate these two parking spaces or provide visibility improvements (mirrors or other alternative measures). ?c. The minimum length of parking spaces is 18 feet. It appears that parking spaces 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 98, 100, 101, 106 and 107 do not meet this requirement. Jd. Provide the designed angle of the angled parking (parking spaces 85-96 and 100-107). e. Drive aisles widths do not measure the required 24 feet. Jf. There is a traffic flow/vehicle turning movement conflict at the ramp with the two-way flow, ramp flow and parking spaces. Potentially look at a one-way traffic flow on Level 1 parking. Jg. Ensure the vertical height clearance for handicap van is a minimum of 8'-2". ?h. Based on the number of parking spaces provided, there is a minimum of seven handicap parking spaces required. Since entrances/lobbies are dispersed, handicap accessibility may require handicap parking adjacent to all entrances/lobbies (but not necessarily on both floors). ? i. No handicap parking is provided adjacent to the elevator lobbies for the units in the northeast corner of the building. ,/j. Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. Jk. Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels. J1. Doorways are indicated in the "striped-out" blank areas in the northwest corner onto 5th Street, in the southwest corner next to South Gulfview Blvd., in the southwest corner of the southern finger of the property opposite Coronado Drive with no indication as to what these doors are leading to (a sidewalk?). im. Required egress stairwells do not indicate exit doors to the outside (with the required egress sidewalks). n. No public sidewalks are shown within the Coronado Drive, 5th Street or South Gulfview Blvd. right-of-ways (especially concerned with the location of the sidewalk onto the subject property along that portion of Coronado Drive where the deceleration lane is located). The sidewalk along Coronado Drive must be seven-foot wide (per Beach Walk). WVV u(v(0V Page 1 of 4 o. A motor court is proposed along Coronado Drive with a dropoff area. The motor court is presently wide enough for two-way traffic, however, a one-way flow is recommended (north to south flow). The median length needs to be reduced on the north side to allow northbound vehicular turning movement allowing a more direct access to the entrance to the under building parking. With a one-way flow, it is recommended to reduce the width of the drive. J P. It is difficult to determine the location of structures (walls, stairs, patios, sidewalks, etc.) along the South Gulfview Blvd. side of the building. These are all structures, which should be drawn in with solid lines, not dashed lines like an overhang. Jq. It is unclear what the four-foot front setback dimension from 5th Street is being measured to, since there is a seven-foot dimension shown on Sheet A2.03 for Level 3 and there doesn't appear to be any structure at the four-foot setback until a portion of a unit on Level 3. r. It is unclear what the angled areas are within the 5th Street right-of-way. If it is on-street, parallel parking, it will need to meet City dimensional requirements and it should be coordinated with the Beach Walk improvements. J2. By the floor plans for Levels 1 and 2 it appears that Villas 4, 5 and 6 do not have any elevator access from the parking on Level 1 or to the amenities on Level 3. Based on a preliminary review by our Building Plans Reviewers, the Fair Housing Act will require an accessible path from handicap parking (or have a handicap space next to the units) to these villas on Level 2. Additionally, an accessible path from these villa units to an elevator to provide access to the common elements on Level 3 or the addition of an elevator next to these units will be required. 3. Sheet A2.02 - J a. Demonstrate how a vehicle enters and exits parking spaces 79 and 80 without backing into the north/south drive aisle. Additionally, it is unclear whether there is a solid wall between parking spaces 80 and 81 restricting driver visibility for spaces 79 and 80. b. Drive aisles widths do not measure the required 24 feet. 1 c. The minimum length of parking spaces is 18 feet. It appears that parking spaces 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 and 88 do not meet this requirement. d. Provide the designed angle of the angled parking (parking spaces 59-70 and 81-88)* e. Drive aisles widths do not measure the required 24 feet. f. Ensure the vertical height clearance for handicap van is a minimum of 8'-2". f g. No handicap parking is provided adjacent to the elevator lobbies for the units / in the northeast corner of the building. J h. . No handicap parking is provided adjacent to Villas 4, 5 and6 in the northwest corner of the building. li. Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. Page 2 of 4 •) •' J j. Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels. 1 k. It is difficult to determine the location of structures (walls, stairs, patios, sidewalks, etc.) along the South Gulfview Blvd. side of the building. 1. It is unclear what the four-foot front setback dimension from 5th Street is being measured to, since there is a seven-foot dimension shown on Sheet A2.03 for Level 3 and there doesn't appear to be any structure at the four-foot setback until a portion of a unit on Level 3. 4. Sheet A2.03 - f a. Renumber Units 9, 10, 11 and 12 to Units 7, 8, 9 and 10. ® Dimension the width of the balcony projections from the face of the building (maximum of two feet allowed by Code) for Units 11 and 12. Jc. It is assumed that the bar and social space(s) are for the unit owners and their guests only (?). 5. It is assumed that the pool and hot tubs on Level 3 are raised above the deck, since the parking and drive aisles on Level 2 do not reflect a recessed or sunken circumstance, which would appear to restrict parking or a drive aisle from the location below the pool and hot tubs (?). 6 Sheet A2.04 - Dimension the width of the balcony projections from the face of the building (maximum of two feet allowed by Code) for Units 11 and 12. ©7 Sheet A2.05 - Dimension the width of the balcony projections from the face of the building (maximum of two feet allowed by Code) for Units 11 and 12. ?8. Provide the North and South Elevation drawings. 9. Sheet A3.01 West Elevation - a. Drawing has left out the parking deck extension on the south side that runs along Coronado Drive. Revise. J b. Drawing on the left (north) side appears to indicate the building going farther north (which it doesn't) on Levels 1 and 2. Revise. Oc Depiction of Villas 4, 5 and 6 are not accurately shown, based on the floor plans on Sheet A2.02 (sliding glass doors, balconies and windows are incorrect). Additionally, there appears something of a villa to the left (north) of Villa 6 that doesn't show up on the floor plan. J10. Sheets A3.01, A3.02 and North and South Elevations - Provide a Building Materials Legend similar to that on the approved plans, as it is difficult to ( determine the materials and colors of these materials. J 11. Stairwell egress - This has not been reviewed with Building Plans or Fire Reviewers. This should be done to ensure compliance with Building and Fire Codes provisions and that such required egress does not create issues for the proposed design (thereby potentially reducing the number of parking spaces). 112. The Fire Department does not want any "scissor" stairs. 413. This comment is more of a "heads up." Although the storm water attenuation and water quality vault was moved to a different location, all the previous comments made by Engineering will still apply. Once an engineer has been selected, please review the plans for Beach Walk, which depicts the new storm pipes on Coronado and 5th Street. Stormwater Engineering would like the Page 3 of 4 J engineer if possible to tie the outfall structure into the proposed storm water inlet at the SW comer of Coronado and 5th Street adjacent to the site. 14. . The major areas of concern relate to a substantial reduction to setbacks in two areas of the site/building relative to the original approved locations by the CDB: J a. The first area is on the north side. The City advertises the smallest setback requested, which was 3.63 feet (to building). This 3.63 feet was to one location at the northwest corner where the pool was, which was only one level high. The other portions of the building were set back at a minimum of 15 feet to over 28 feet from the 5th Street right-of-way. With this proposed revision, the minimum setback (four feet) has been applied to the floor area of the northernmost unit and a seven-foot setback applied to the entire building from the ground up to the top of the building. This changes the character of the building in relation to 5th Street. Staff may be able to live with the seven- foot setback for the first two levels (the parking levels), but the living areas of the northernmost unit should respect this 15-foot front setback. Code allows, and the approved plan provided, for cantilevered balconies to extend two feet into the required setback. b. The second area is southern portion of the west side. Again, the City advertises the smallest setback requested, which was 5.45 feet (to building). This 5.45 feet was also to one location at the northwest corner where the pool was, which was only one level high. The other portions of the building where units were located were set back at a minimum of 15 feet from the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way. With this proposed revision, the minimum setback (six feet) has been applied to the floor area of Villas 1, 2 and 3 and Units 11 on Levels 3-10 from the ground up to the top of the building. This changes the character of the building in relation to South Gulfview Boulevard. The living areas of these units should respect this 15-foot front setback. Staff is willing to look at some compromise setback to the building in this area, as the Beach Walk improvements push the roadway and pedestrian promenade farther away from the parcel property line where impacts are not as exacerbated as the north side. Code allows for cantilevered balconies to extend two feet into the required setback. Page 4 of 4 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ?- - ??- MAY 171006 i (€ ! k ? PLANNING DEPARTMENT tt, + fit' ti CITY OF CLEARWATER C u r t s G a I n e s H a I I J o n e s Architects 1213 Last 6th Avenue. Tampa, Florida, 33605-4905 Voice (313) 223-8000 Pax (313) 223-0770 Web Site cgharchitects.com FL Cert ;X0001590 May 15, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 Re: Development Order No. FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Siena Sands Condominium Minor Revisions Dear Mr. Wells, Here are our responses to your comments dated April 20, 2006 (the responses are in bold/blue): Revisions Needed to Siena Sands Plans - 401.411 and 421 South Gulfview Blvd. Please find attached a revised set of documents dated 5/16/06. Each sheet has been revised as a response to your comments; south and north elevation sheets A3.03 and A3.04 have been added: Sheet A2.01 - Level 1 plan has been revised; there are now 114 parking spaces instead of 120 spaces on this level. a. Demonstrate how a vehicle enters and exits parking spaces 108 and 109 without backing into the north/south drive aisle. The spaces have been renumbered; spaces 108 and 109 from the previous plan have been deleted. Additionally, it is unclear whether the wall adjacent to parking space 108 (north side of the down ramp) is a full height solid wall restricting driver visibility for spaces 108 and 109. The ramp wall here will have low walls on either side with columns, not solid walls. b. Parking spaces 26 and 40 require the drivers to back out "blind" due to the adjacent solid walls. Parking space 26 is in a very vulnerable location, due to its location in proximity to the main exit to Coronado Drive. Either eliminate these two parking spaces or provide visibility improvements (mirrors or other alternative measures). We will provide mirror(s) at space 26; space 40 from the prior plan has been eliminated to allow pedestrian access to the adjacent lobby. c. The minimum length of parking spaces is 18 feet. It appears that parking spaces 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 98, 100, 101, 106 and 107 do not meet this requirement. All spaces are now 18' deep x 91wide minimum typical as required. Accessible spaces are 181deep x 121wide plus a 5' walkway as required. d. Provide the designed angle of the angled parking (parking spaces 85-96 and 100-107). The angle of all parking spaces has been revised to be 90 degrees from the drive aisle. e. Drive aisles widths do not measure the required 24 feet. All of the two way drive aisles will be 24' minimum. The entry and exit drive one way aisles will approximately 14' (12' min.). f. There is a traffic flow/vehicle turning movement conflict at the ramp with the two-way flow, ramp flow and parking spaces. Potentially look at a one-way traffic flow on Level 1 parking. We would like to keep this area two-way; a radius has been added to the right lane approaching the ramp to improve the traffic flow. g. Ensure the vertical height clearance for handicap van is a minimum of 8'-2". Agreed, a minimum clearance of 8'2" will be provided for accessible spaces. h. Based on the number of parking spaces provided, there is a minimum of seven handicap parking spaces required. Since entrances/lobbies are dispersed, handicap accessibility may require handicap parking adjacent to all entrances/lobbies (but not necessarily on both floors). The new total parking count is now 199 spaces (114 at level 1 and 85 at level 2). Thus the required handicap count is now 6 spaces; these are distributed so that each lobby has at least one adjacent accessible space. i. No handicap parking is provided adjacent to the elevator lobbies for the units in the northeast corner of the building. The revised plan now provides an accessible space here. Siena Sands Rev. Letter 5.15.20 • Page 2 j. Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. There are various locations where we have close to a 90 degree turn on the inside lane; at these locations cars will be encroaching the opposing lane somewhat. We will provide mirrors at these locations to improve the safety. Prior to permit we will indicate car turning templates at turning corners to demonstrate these conditions where mirrors will be necessary. k. Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels. Columns have now been set back off the edge of the drive aisles. 1. Doorways are indicated in the "striped-out" blank areas in the northwest corner onto 5`h Street, in the southwest corner next to South Gulfview Blvd., in the southwest corner of the southern finger of the property opposite Coronado Drive with no indication as to what these doors are leading to (a sidewalk?). The plan now indicates required exit doors and sidewalks. m. Required egress stairwells do not indicate exit doors to the outside (with the required egress sidewalks). Again, the plan now indicates the exit doors and sidewalks. n. No public sidewalks are shown within the Coronado Drive, 5`h Street or South Gulfview Blvd. right-of- ways (especially concerned with the location of the sidewalk onto the subject property along that portion of Coronado Drive where the deceleration lane is located). The sidewalk along Coronado Drive must be seven-foot wide (per Beach Walk). Sidewalks are now indicated around the perimeter; the sidewalk along Coronado Drive will be a minimum of seven-foot as required. o. A motor court is proposed along Coronado Drive with a drop-off area. The motor court is presently wide enough for two-way traffic, however, a one-way flow is recommended (north to south flow). The median length needs to be reduced on the north side to allow northbound vehicular turning movement allowing a more direct access to the entrance to the under building parking. With a one-way flow, it is recommended to reduce the width of the drive. The entry drive has been redesigned with improved one-way flow. p. It is difficult to determine the location of structures (walls, stairs, patios, sidewalks, etc.) along the South Gulfview Blvd. side of the building. These are all structures, which should be drawn in with solid lines, not dashed lines like an overhang. The revised plan now indicates these elements correctly with solid lines. q. It is unclear what the four-foot front setback dimension from 5`h Street is being measured to, since there is a seven-foot dimension shown on Sheet A2.03 for Level 3 and there doesn't appear to be any structure at the four-foot setback until a portion of a unit on Level 3. Agreed, the parking structure setback dimension at this location is 7' not 4'. r. It is unclear what the angled areas are within the 5`h Street right-of-way. If it is on-street, parallel parking, it will need to meet City dimensional requirements and it should be coordinated with the Beach Walk improvements. Agreed, this is on-street parallel parking and will meet the City's requirements and be coordinated with Beach Walk improvements. By the floor plans for Levels 1 and 2 it appears that Villas 4, 5 and 6 do not have any elevator access from the parking on Level 1 or to the amenities on Level 3. Based on a preliminary review by our Building Plans Reviewers, the Fair Housing Act will require an accessible path from handicap parking (or have a handicap space next to the units) to these villas on Level 2. Additionally, an accessible path from these villa units to an elevator to provide access to the common elements on Level 3 or the addition of an elevator next to these units will be required. Agreed, the second level plan has been revised to provide an accessible path from Villas 4, 5 and 6 to the elevator at the northeast side of the building. Sheet A2.02 - Level 2 plan has been revised; there are now 85 parking spaces instead of 93 spaces on this level. a. Demonstrate how a vehicle enters and exits parking spaces 79 and 80 without backing into the north/south drive aisle. The spaces have been renumbered; spaces 79 and 80 from the previous plan have been deleted. Additionally, it is unclear whether there is a solid wall between parking spaces 80 and 81 restricting driver visibility for spaces 79 and 80. The ramp wall here will have low walls on either side with columns, not solid walls. b. Drive aisles widths do not measure the required 24 feet. All of the two way drive aisles will be 24' minimum. c. The minimum length of parking spaces is 18 feet. It appears that parking spaces 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 and 88 do not meet this requirement. All spaces are now 18' deep x 9'wide minimum typical as required. Accessible spaces are 18'deep x 12'wide plus a 5' walkway as required. d. Provide the designed angle of the angled parking (parking spaces 59-70 and 81-88). The angle of all parking spaces has been revised to be 90 degrees from the drive aisle. e. Drive aisles widths do not measure the required 24 feet. Same as 3b above. Siena Sands Rev. Letter 5.15.200 . Page 3 f. Ensure the vertical height clearance for handicap van is a minimum of 8'-2". Agreed, a minimum clearance of 8'2" will be provided for accessible spaces. g. No handicap parking is provided adjacent to the elevator lobbies for the units in the northeast corner of the building. Handicap parking is now provided here. h. No handicap parking is provided adjacent to Villas 4, 5 and6 in the northwest corner of the building. The second level plan has been revised to provide an accessible path from Villas 4, 5 and 6 to the elevator at the northeast side of the building. i. Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. Car turning templates are now indicated. j. Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels. Columns have now been set back off the edge of the drive aisles. k. It is difficult to determine the location of structures (walls, stairs, patios, sidewalks, etc.) along the South Gulfview Blvd. side of the building. These structures have now been drawn more clearly and accurately. 1. It is unclear what the four-foot front setback dimension from 5`" Street is being measured to, since there is a seven-foot dimension shown on Sheet A2.03 for Level 3 and there does not appear to be any structure at the four-foot setback until a portion of a unit on Level 3. Agreed, the parking structure setback dimension at this location is 7' not 4'. 4. Sheet A2.03 - Level 3 has been revised. a. Renumber Units 9, 10, 11 and 12 to Units 7, 8, 9 and 10. Yes, there are only 10 units proposed on this level, however we have labeled them 9, 10, 11, and 12 because the unit number here represents the unit type (not quantity). b. Dimension the width of the balcony projections from the face of the building (maximum of two feet allowed by Code) for Units 1 1 and 12. Agreed, the balcony projections will be a maximum of two feet as now indicated here. c. It is assumed that the bar and social space(s) are for the unit owners and their guests only (?). Yes. 5. It is assumed that the pool and hot tubs on Level 3 are raised above the deck, since the parking and drive aisles on Level 2 do not reflect a recessed or sunken circumstance, which would appear to restrict parking or a drive aisle from the location below the pool and hot tubs (?). Yes, the pool hot tub and adjacent terrace on level 3 will be raised approximately 18" to 24" ; this couple with a 13' floor to floor height between levels 2 and 3 will allow for a pool approximately 4.5' deep. This raised area is yet to be designed but will be accessible by pedestrian ramp. 6. Sheet A2.04 - Dimension the width of the balcony projections from the face of the building (maximum of two feet allowed by Code) for Units 11 and 12. Agreed, the balcony projections will be a maximum of two feet as now indicated on the revised plan. 7. Sheet A2.05 - Dimension the width of the balcony projections from the face of the building (maximum of two feet allowed by Code) for Units 11 and 12. Agreed, the balcony projections will be a maximum of two feet as now indicated on the revised plan. 8. Provide the North and South Elevation drawings. These Elevations are now provided; see sheets A3.03 and A3.04. 9. Sheet A3.01 West Elevation - a. Drawing has left out the parking deck extension on the south side that runs along Coronado Drive. Revise. The parking deck extension on the south side is now indicated. b. Drawing on the left (north) side appears to indicate the building going farther north (which it doesn't) on Levels 1 and 2. Revise. This has been revised to reflect the current building (levels one and two are now approximately 8' farther north than the tower above). c. Depiction of Villas 4, 5 and 6 are not accurately shown, based on the floor plans on Sheet A2.02 (sliding glass doors, balconies and windows are incorrect). Additionally, there appears something of a villa to the left (north) of Villa 6 that doesn't show up on the floor plan. The elevations have been revised here to coincide with the plans. 10. Sheets A3.01, A3.02 and North and South Elevations - Provide a Building Materials Legend similar to that on the approved plans, as it is difficult to determine the materials and colors of these materials. A material and color legend has now been provided for the elevations. 11. Stairwell egress - This has not been reviewed with Building Plans or Fire Reviewers. This should be done to ensure compliance with Building and Fire Codes provisions and that such required egress does not create issues for the proposed design (thereby potentially reducing the number of parking spaces). This will be done during design development prior well in advance of permit submission. 12. The Fire Department does not want any "scissor" stairs. Agreed, there are not any "scissor" stairs on this project. 13. This comment is more of a "heads up." Although the storm water attenuation and water quality vault was Siena Sands Rev. Letter 5.15.2 0 Page 4 moved to a different location, all the previous comments made by Engineering will still apply. Once an engineer has been selected, please review the plans for Beach Walk, which depicts the new storm pipes on Coronado and 5th Street. Stormwater Engineering would like the engineer if possible to tie the outfall structure into the proposed storm water inlet at the SW corner of Coronado and 5th Street adjacent to the site. OK. This will be reviewed by our engineer during design development. 14. The major areas of concern relate to a substantial reduction to setbacks in two areas of the site/building relative to the original approved locations by the CDB: a. The first area is on the north side. The City advertises the smallest setback requested, which was 3.63 feet (to building). This 3.63 feet was to one location at the northwest corner where the pool was, which was only one level high. The other portions of the building were set back at a minimum of 15 feet to over 28 feet from the 5`" Street right-of-way. With this proposed revision, the minimum setback (four feet) has been applied to the floor area of the northernmost unit and a seven-foot setback applied to the entire building from the ground up to the top of the building. This changes the character of the building in relation to 5`" Street. Staff may be able to live with the seven-foot setback for the first two levels (the parking levels), but the living areas of the northernmost unit should respect this 15-foot front setback. Code allows, and the approved plan provided, for cantilevered balconies to extend two feet into the required setback. Agreed, plan levels 3 thru roof have been revised to indicate a setback of 15' along the north side for the northern most unit (unit 1); the parking deck levels 1 and 2 remain at a 7' setback on the north side. b. The second area is southern portion of the west side. Again, the City advertises the smallest setback requested, which was 5.45 feet (to building). This 5.45 feet was also to one location at the northwest corner where the pool was, which was only one level high. The other portions of the building where units were located were set back at a minimum of 15 feet from the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of- way. With this proposed revision, the minimum setback (six feet) has been applied to the floor area of Villas 1, 2 and 3 and Units 11 on Levels 3-10 from the ground up to the top of the building. This changes the character of the building in relation to South Gulfview Boulevard. The living areas of these units should respect this 15-foot front setback. Staff is willing to look at some compromise setback to the building in this area, as the Beach Walk improvements push the roadway and pedestrian promenade farther away from the parcel property line where impacts are not as exacerbated as the north side. Code allows for cantilevered balconies to extend two feet into the required setback. Agreed, plan levels 2 thru roof have been revised to indicate a setback of 15' to the main building plan for Villas andl, 2 and 3 and Unit 11 on levels 3-10 along the south end of the west elevation. Open stairs for the 6 villas (level 2 to grade) and open stairs for the common pool terrace (level 3 to grade) will be setback a minimum of 61. Mr. Wells, we hope that these revised plans and responses clearly address your concerns.. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or comments. Regards, a4AL Chuck Jones, AIA, Principal Curts Gaines Hall Jones Architects 1213 E. 6th Avenue Tampa, FL 33605 cc: Ed Armstrong Octavio Cabrera Phil Graham Michael Delk Scott Rice Martin Cole Joe Burdette 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:18 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: Sienna Sands Resubmittal dated May 15, 2006 Wayne, The stormwater comment was acknowledged and will be further addressed at building permit. On the traffic comments, two issues will need to be addressed at building permit: 1. A stop bar shall be provided at the base of the down ramp on the first floor. This will force vehicles coming down from the second level to stop before entering the drive aisle on the first floor. 2. The proposed parking spaces along 5th Street shall be coordinated with the Beach Walk plans. As these spaces will be located in the public ROW, they may be removed or modified by the City at any time with no compensation to the Sienna Sands developer. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com 0 c? ? Thy Conm Grog UC To: Wayne Wells Fr: Joe Burdette Re: Siena Sands Revisions Wayne Here are the new drawings showing the minor revisions for Siena Sands. ORIGINAL RECENED MAY 171006 PANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWWTER I have attached the questions you needed answered and our response to each item. We have agreed to everything you requested and I believe we have addressed everyone of your concerns, but if not please call me at 727-458-4528 or email me at hunraf@aol.com I appreciate you helping us out with this. We are trying to get our construction drawings in for permit and this is the last thing holding us up. T anks again Joe 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Hunraf@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:09 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Chaddy@CGHJArchitects.com; chuck@cgharchitects.com; dhall@gozahall; MRCole27@aol.com Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Siena Sands Revisions Wayne I forgot you were closed this afternoon so I just had the revised drawings for Siena Sands put on your desk along with the responses in narrative form. Anything you can do to expedite these would be a great help so we can get the construction drawings ready for permit. Thanks Joe 5/17/2006 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 7:01 AM To: 'Hunraf@aol.com' Cc: Chaddy@CGHJArchitects.com; chuck@cgharchitects.com; MRCole27@aol.com Subject: Siena Sands Two please. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:46 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Chaddy@CGHJArchitects.com; chuck@cgharchitects.com; MRCole27@aol.com Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Sienna Sands Wayne We will have the minor revisions for Sienna Sands this week. How many sets of plans to you need? Joe 5/16/2006 $ a` C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R ;ra.• _ -rCII:o r PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAI. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLWWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIFW May 3, 2006 Joe Burdette Owners Representative for Siena Sands 618 Pineland Avenue Belleair, FL 33756 Re: FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Burdette: A proposal has been submitted to the Planning Department requesting a changed design for the above referenced project be considered a Minor Revision, under the provisions of Section 4-406.A of the Community Development Code. The Planning Department, as well as other Development Review Committee members, has reviewed the proposed Minor Revision changed design and has issued a list of items needing to be clarified or modified prior to the issuance of a Development Order for this proposal. It is our understanding that the consultants for this project are presently preparing the requested clarifications and modifications. Should the clarifications and modifications be acceptable, it is anticipated that a Development Order would be issued and no public hearing would be required. Should you have any additional questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at (727) 562-4504. Sincerely, ichae e 4AP , Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0401 - 0421 Siena Sands (7) - Approved (Letter to Joe Burdette re Minor Revisions 5.3.06doc FRANK HiBBARD, MAYOR BiLI, JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMENIIIER HOPI' HAIWIXON, COUNCILMIiMIiIiR ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COLMAIDIFIABER "I"QUAI. EMPLOYMENT AND Ai.-FIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 0 • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 9:38 AM To: 'Hunraf@aol.com' Cc: MRCole27@aol.com; Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: Joe Burdette -Re:.Sienna Sands Minor Amendments Joe - Thanks. I will prepare a letter for Michael's signature when he returns next Monday. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 7:42 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: MRCole27@aol.com Subject: Re: Joe Burdette -Re: Sienna Sands Minor Amendments In a message dated 4/26/2006 7:24:58 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com writes: Joe - 1. 1 do not know how quickly you need such letter, but Michael Delk is out of town until Monday, May 1. Michael should be the one signing the letter. 2. As part of the list of items needing to be revised prior to a final determination of the proposal being a "minor revision," there were two areas of major concern. Unless satisfactorily revised, the proposal would be required to go back to the CDB. We are assuming at this point that the two areas of major concern will be satisfactorily revised, as well as all other items on the list provided. We are unaware of the timing of any resubmittal of the proposal to revisit the items on the list. 3. Yes, such a letter will require a $50.00 fee (check made out to City of Clearwater). Let me know - Wayne -----Original Message----- From: hunraf@aol.com [mailto:hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 11:36 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Joe Burdette -Re: Sienna Sands Minor Amendments Wayne Can I please get a letter from you saying that the items listed in your letter regarding the minor change request for Sienna Sands do not require a public hearing. It is for our lender as well as some potential investors. 4/26/2006 Page 2 of 2 z If there is a charge for the letter (like a zoning letter) just let me know and I will bring a check. If you would please address it to: Joe Burdette Owners Representative Sienna Sands 618 Pineland Ave Belleair, Florida 33756 Call me (458-4528) and I will be glad to come by and pick it up. If there is any problem please let me know Thanks Joe Next week is fine. All the letter needs to say that if we satisfactorily address the issues in the letter then no further public hearing will be required. Let me know when it is available and I will come by and pick it up and bring the check. Just FYI: We are meeting with the architects next week. A number of the issues are the same as Indo Beach and it is the same architect. We are confident we can meet all the concerns listed. Thanks For you r help Joe 4/26/2006 ,? ? • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 6:22 PM To: 'Hunraf@aol.com' Cc: MRCole27@aol.com; Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil; 'chuck@cgharchitects.com' Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Sienna Sands Letter Joe - I am attaching the review comments that need to be reflected on revised drawings for the above project. These plans have been reviewed with the Engineering Department, Fire Department and for certain items, the Development Services Department and their comments are included in the attachment. This project was originally submitted and reviewed by the DRC and by the CDB. The CDB approved the original project on September 20, 2005. What is being requested is a "minor revision" to that originally approved by the CDB. The plans for this "minor revision" become the NEW plans by which building plans are reviewed against. Therefore, the attached comments must be addressed now. Michael Delk has already communicated the major concerns that we have with this "minor revision." These major concerns are embodied in Comment #14. Please submit two sets of revised plans reflecting the comments as outlined in the attachment. We will then review the revised "minor revision" plans in light of these comments. Should the revisions be acceptable, it would then be assumed that a Development Order for the "minor revisions" would be issued. While only "architectural plans" have been submitted as part of this process at this time, it is presumed that revised civil plans to be submitted for building permits later will reflect these "minor revisions" being requested. After that, then plans could be submitted for building permit purposes. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit must be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2006). The Planning Director may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity, provided good cause is shown and documented. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments which would significantly affect the project. Should you have any questions regarding the process or the comments, feel free to contact me by email or by phone (727-562-4504). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 7:56 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: MRCole27@aol.com 4/20/2006 ,e • • Page 2 of 2 Subject: Joe Burdette - Sienna Sands Letter Wayne Could you do us a favor on your "Minor Changes" letter for Sienna Sands and if there are items (such as parking angles or things like that) that we can deal with as permit issues, could you identify those things as having to be dealt with "prior to permit" instead of now as they are more construction issues than minor change issues? This would allow us, if there are no further changes in our floor plans, to get our condo docs completed and filed and keep moving forward. Let me know what you think Thanks as always for your help Joe 4/20/2006 April 20, 2006 Revisions Needed to Siena Sands Plans - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Blvd. 1. Sheet A2.01 - a. Demonstrate how a vehicle enters and exits parking spaces 108 and 109 without backing into the north/south drive aisle. Additionally, it is unclear whether the wall adjacent to parking space 108 (north side of the down ramp) is a full height solid wall restricting driver visibility for spaces 108 and 109. b. Parking spaces 26 and 40 require the drivers to back out "blind" due to the adjacent solid walls. Parking space 26 is in a very vulnerable location due to its location in proximity to the main exit to Coronado Drive. Either eliminate these two parking spaces or provide visibility improvements (mirrors or other alternative measures). c. The minimum length of parking spaces is 18 feet. It appears that parking spaces 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 98, 100, 101, 106 and 107 do not meet this requirement. d. Provide the designed angle of the angled parking (parking spaces 85-96 and 100-107). e. Drive aisles widths do not measure the required 24 feet. f. There is a traffic flow/vehicle turning movement conflict at the ramp with the two-way flow, ramp flow and parking spaces. Potentially look at a one-way traffic flow on Level 1 parking. g. Ensure the vertical height clearance for handicap van is a minimum of 8'-2". h. Based on the number of parking spaces provided, there is a minimum of seven handicap parking spaces required. Since entrances/lobbies are dispersed, handicap accessibility may require handicap parking adjacent to all entrances/lobbies (but not necessarily on both floors). i. No handicap parking is provided adjacent to the elevator lobbies for the units in the northeast corner of the building. j. Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. k. Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels. 1. Doorways are indicated in the "striped-out" blank areas in the northwest corner onto 5th Street, in the southwest corner next to South Gulfview Blvd., in the southwest corner of the southern finger of the property opposite Coronado Drive with no indication as to what these doors are leading to (a sidewalk?). in. Required egress stairwells do not indicate exit doors to the outside (with the required egress sidewalks). n. No public sidewalks are shown within the Coronado Drive, 5th Street or South Gulfview Blvd. right-of-ways (especially concerned with the location of the sidewalk onto the subject property along that portion of Coronado Drive where the deceleration lane is located). The sidewalk along Coronado Drive must be seven-foot wide (per Beach Walk). Page 1 of 4 o. A motor court is proposed along Coronado Drive with a dropoff area. The motor court is presently wide enough for two-way traffic, however, a one-way flow is recommended (north to south flow). The median length needs to be reduced on the north side to allow northbound vehicular turning movement allowing a more direct access to the entrance to the under building parking. With a one-way flow, it is recommended to reduce the width of the drive. p. It is difficult to determine the location of structures (walls, stairs, patios, sidewalks, etc.) along the South Gulfview Blvd. side of the building. These are all structures, which should be drawn in with solid lines, not dashed lines like an overhang. q. It is unclear what the four-foot front setback dimension from 5th Street is being measured to, since there is a seven-foot dimension shown on Sheet A2.03 for Level 3 and there doesn't appear to be any structure at the four-foot setback until a portion of a unit on Level 3. r. It is unclear what the angled areas are within the 5th Street right-of-way. If it is on-street, parallel parking, it will need to meet City dimensional requirements and it should be coordinated with the Beach Walk improvements. 2. By the floor plans for Levels 1 and 2 it appears that Villas 4, 5 and 6 do not have any elevator access from the parking on Level 1 or to the amenities on Level 3. Based on a preliminary review by our Building Plans Reviewers, the Fair Housing Act will require an accessible path from handicap parking (or have a handicap space next to the units) to these villas on Level 2. Additionally, an accessible path from these villa units to an elevator to provide access to the common elements on Level 3 or the addition of an elevator next to these units will be required. 3. Sheet A2.02 - a. Demonstrate how a vehicle enters and exits parking spaces 79 and 80 without backing into the north/south drive aisle. Additionally, it is unclear whether there is a solid wall between parking spaces 80 and 81 restricting driver visibility for spaces 79 and 80. b. Drive aisles widths do not measure the required 24 feet. c. The minimum length of parking spaces is 18 feet. It appears that parking spaces 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 and 88 do not meet this requirement. d. Provide the designed angle of the angled parking (parking spaces 59-70 and 81-88). e. Drive aisles widths do not measure the required 24 feet. f. Ensure the vertical height clearance for handicap van is a minimum of 8'-2". g. No handicap parking is provided adjacent to the elevator lobbies for the units in the northeast corner of the building. h. No handicap parking is provided adjacent to Villas 4, 5 and6 in the northwest corner of the building. i. Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. Page 2 of 4 j. Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels. k. It is difficult to determine the location of structures (walls, stairs, patios, sidewalks, etc.) along the South Gulfview Blvd. side of the building. 1. It is unclear what the four-foot front setback dimension from 5th Street is being measured to, since there is a seven-foot dimension shown on Sheet A2.03 for Level 3 and there doesn't appear to be any structure at the four-foot setback until a portion of a unit on Level 3. 4. Sheet A2.03 - a. Renumber Units 9, 10, 11 and 12 to Units 7, 8, 9 and 10. b. Dimension the width of the balcony projections from the face of the building (maximum of two feet allowed by Code) for Units 11 and 12. c. It is assumed that the bar and social space(s) are for the unit owners and their guests only (?). 5. It is assumed that the pool and hot tubs on Level 3 are raised above the deck, since the parking and drive aisles on Level 2 do not reflect a recessed or sunken circumstance, which would appear to restrict parking or a drive aisle from the location below the pool and hot tubs (?). 6. Sheet A2.04 - Dimension the width of the balcony projections from the face of the building (maximum of two feet allowed by Code) for Units 11 and 12. 7. Sheet A2.05 - Dimension the width of the balcony projections from the face of the building (maximum of two feet allowed by Code) for Units 11 and 12. 8. Provide the North and South Elevation drawings. 9. Sheet A3.01 West Elevation - a. Drawing has left out the parking deck extension on the south side that runs along Coronado Drive. Revise. b. Drawing on the left (north) side appears to indicate the building going farther north (which it doesn't) on Levels 1 and 2. Revise. c. Depiction of Villas 4, 5 and 6 are not accurately shown, based on the floor plans on Sheet A2.02 (sliding glass doors, balconies and windows are incorrect). Additionally, there appears something of a villa to the left (north) of Villa 6 that doesn't show up on the floor plan. 10. Sheets A3.01, A3.02 and North and South Elevations - Provide a Building Materials Legend similar to that on the approved plans, as it is difficult to determine the materials and colors of these materials. 11. Stairwell egress - This has not been reviewed with Building Plans or Fire Reviewers. This should be done to ensure compliance with Building and Fire Codes provisions and that such required egress does not create issues for the proposed design (thereby potentially reducing the number of parking spaces). 12. The Fire Department does not want any "scissor" stairs. 13. This comment is more of a "heads up." Although the storm water attenuation and water quality vault was moved to a different location, all the previous comments made by Engineering will still apply. Once an engineer has been selected, please review the plans for Beach Walk, which depicts the new storm pipes on Coronado and 5th Street. Stormwater Engineering would like the Page 3 of 4 engineer if possible to tie the outfall structure into the proposed storm water inlet at the SW corner of Coronado and 5th Street adjacent to the site. 14. The major areas of concern relate to a substantial reduction to setbacks in two areas of the site/building relative to the original approved locations by the CDB: a. The first area is on the north side. The City advertises the smallest setback requested, which was 3.63 feet (to building). This 3.63 feet was to one location at the northwest corner where the pool was, which was only one level high. The other portions of the building were set back at a minimum of 15 feet to over 28 feet from the 5th Street right-of-way. With this proposed revision, the minimum setback (four feet) has been applied to the floor area of the northernmost unit and a seven-foot setback applied to the entire building from the ground up to the top of the building. This changes the character of the building in relation to 5th Street. Staff may be able to live with the seven- foot setback for the first two levels (the parking levels), but the living areas of the northernmost unit should respect this 15-foot front setback. Code allows, and the approved plan provided, for cantilevered balconies to extend two feet into the required setback. b. The second area is southern portion of the west side. Again, the City advertises the smallest setback requested, which was 5.45 feet (to building). This 5.45 feet was also to one location at the northwest corner where the pool was, which was only one level high. The other portions of the building where units were located were set back at a minimum of 15 feet from the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way. With this proposed revision, the minimum setback (six feet) has been applied to the floor area of Villas 1, 2 and 3 and Units 11 on Levels 3-10 from the ground up to the top of the building. This changes the character of the building in relation to South Gulfview Boulevard. The living areas of these units should respect this 15-foot front setback. Staff is willing to look at some compromise setback to the building in this area, as the Beach Walk improvements push the roadway and pedestrian promenade farther away from the parcel property line where impacts are not as exacerbated as the north side. Code allows for cantilevered balconies to extend two feet into the required setback. Page 4 of 4 • • Wells, Wayne From: Maran, Robert (Bob) Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 4:35 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Barker, Brian A. Subject: Sienna Sands Wayne, I have looked at the new conceptual plan for Sienna Sands. Although the storm water attenuation and water quality vault was moved to a different location, all the previous comments made by Engineering will still apply. Please let the developer know that once he has selected an engineer he should have him review the plans for Beachwalk which depicts the new storm pipes on Coronado and 5th Street. I would like him if possible to tie into the proposed stormwater inlet at the SW corner of Coronado and 5th Street adjacent to the site. "., • • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 1:50 PM To: 'Hunraf@aol.com' Cc: Wells, Wayne; 'chuck@cgharchitects.com' Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Re: Sienna Sands Joe - We've finessed an initial review. Although we must complete the process of DRC review, from a big picture standpoint we are generally ok with the character issue and this can remain a minor amendment. However, two areas of concern right now that I recommend the architect get with Wayne to resolve. There is a substantial reduction in the north setback of the building relative to the original approval. This reduction (down to four feet) is much less than that reviewed by the CDB. This gives me concern from a performance standpoint. I have a similar but much lesser concern relative to the an area in the southwest portion of the site where the floor area ahs been reduced as well. This area I am confident we can resolve. The north side is more critical. By copy of this email I am encouraging Chuck to get with Wayne ASAP to discuss this concern regarding the north building setback/location adjacent to 5th Street. Aside from these items being worked out, we believe we can keep it at a minor revision level michael Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 727-562-4561 myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 2:33 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Sienna Sands Michael I dropped of the new drawings for Sienna Sands yesterday to your attention. What I am hoping you can do is take a look at it from just the planning departments perspective and let us know we have kept the character of the building the same. We have made no changes to setbacks, height, density or parking (which we far exceed). We can deal with all the other departments issues during permitting. I don't see any problems in meeting any concerns they may have. 3/31/2006 9 0 Page 2 of 2 The big issue is the character of the building. They made the roof line changes and the changes to the East elevation that you suggested. Let me know if you need anything else at all from me. Joe 3/31/2006 • . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 2:49 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Re: Sienna Sands fyi -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 2:33 PM. To: Delk, Michael Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Sienna Sands Michael I dropped of the new drawings for Sienna Sands yesterday to your attention. What I am hoping you can do is take a look at it from just the planning departments perspective and let us know we have kept the character of the building the same. We have made no changes to setbacks, height, density or parking (which we far exceed). We can deal with all the other departments issues during permitting. I don't see any problems in meeting any concerns they may have. The big issue is the character of the building. They made the roof line changes and the changes to the East elevation that you suggested. Let me know if you need anything else at all from me. Joe 3/29/2006 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Hunraf@aol.com Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 2:33 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: ed@jpfirm.com; Ehooperl @aol.com; jeff.handlin@us.taylorwoodrow.com; michael.vanbutsel@us.taylorwoodrow.com; terry.foote@us.taylorwoodrow.com; Delk, Michael Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Sienna Sands Minor Changes Wayne On March 15, we dropped of the letter regarding the "minor changes" to the Sienna Sands Project we discussed with you and Michael Delk in our meeting with the people from Taylor Woodrow. I will be by tomorrow morning (March 28) to give you the revised drawings that reflect the changes we discussed in our meeting as set out in the letter. Please do the best you can to review these drawings as quickly as possible as Taylor Woodrow would like to get the architects going on full construction drawings as soon as possible. If there is anything else you need, please let me know. Thanks again for all your help Joe 3/31/2006 Michael . 0 Here are the revised drawings showing the minor changes in the Sienna Sands project we discussed with Taylor Woodrow a few weeks ago. We have submitted the letter detailing the changes on March 15. We really need to expedite this if possible so I can turn the architects loose on full construction drawings and get this project underway. We can still make more changes if we have to. Call me with any questions you may have. My cell is 458-4528 Anything you can do to help us get this completed would be greatly appreciated. Joe --fl-EF Cr? E 0 T 11--- MAR 2 8 9008 PLAduP+ it JG 3 OCV t OP1"IE N SvCS V rv o> C LF . ,RkNAT'? I I fl E , ` C u r t s Gaines Hall Jones Architects 1213 East 6th Avenue, Tampa, Florida, 33605-4905 Voice (813) 228-8000 Fax (813) 228-0770 Web Site cgh FL, Cert #0000159( March 15, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP U UL MAR 15 2006 City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, PLAN IN DEVELOPMEP Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 Re: Development Order No. FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Sienna Sands Condominium Minor Revisions Dear Mr. Wells, It was a pleasure meeting with you and Michael Delk last week to discuss the Sienna Sands project. Per your request here is a brief list of the proposed "minor revisions" as allowed under section 4-406 which have occurred on this proposed development since the Development Order of September 30, 2005. Please refer the current schematic plans and elevations we left with you dated 3/9/06 as well as the plans dated 8/10/05 which were submitted for the original Development Order. Here then is the list of proposed minor revisions for your review; this list is organized per the nine (9) categories of Section 4-406 which states that a minor revision is one which: 1. Does not alter the location of any private street and/or driveway by more than 20 feet. The two driveways along Coronado drive are proposed to be altered by at or less than 20 feet each. Reference the Building Comparison plan: this is as measured from the centerline of the driveways as measured at the property line. Please note that the entry into parking level is now one way in and the exit is one way out. 2 Does not change the use unless such change is of similar or less intensity, as determined by the community development coordinator. No change in use is proposed. 3. Does not increase the density or intensity of the development. No increase in density or intensity is proposed. 4. Does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area. The current proposed plan does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area as required and indicated in the development order. 5. Does not result in a substantial change to the location of a structure previously approved. There is no substantial change to the location of the structure. The overall building footprint and location is very similar to the original plans and remains consistent with the development order. The overall massing is in compliance with Beach by Design. Sienna Sands Rev. Letter 3.15.20 • Page 2 6. Does not result in a substantial modification or cancellation of any condition placed upon the application as originally approved. No substantial modifications or cancellation of any condition of the development order are requested; all of the conditions of the development order will be met. 7. Does not add property to the parcel proposed for development. No property has been added. 8. Does not increase the height of the buildings in a manner that will change the overall height of the project, will not alter the scale of the project, does not exceed the maximum height permitted in by the applicable special area plan and zoning district. The height will remain consistent with the Development Order which allows 100' high to the roof deck with an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments above the roof deck. 9. Any other minor revision that does not substantially alter the character and design of the project. There are a variety of miscellaneous minor revisions as generally listed below. However, it is our opinion that none of these substantially alter the character and design of the project. The materials and color palette proposed remain the same or will be very similar to the original elevations. While the overall composition of the elevations has been modified based, the overall character of the building remains in the same "Italian Mediterranean Tuscan" style/character. The color and basic material pallete are proposed to remain the same. Also, the same or similar architectural elements and features are still being utilized; these include clay barrel tile roofs (or metal roof system which mimics clay tile at the high roof areas); a combination of roof forms including mansards, hips, parapets, and gable ends; trim banding; aluminum railings (wrought iron look); a combination of arched and conventional windows, eave brackets, trim banding, and horizontal stucco banding at the base. As you can see from the east and west elevation profile comparison sketches the overall massing and scale breakdown has remained in a similar scale and character. Various plan modifications including parking and unit reconfiguration do not "substantially alter the character and design of the project in our opinion. Mr. Wells, we hope that you and your colleagues find that this list of minor revisions is clear and adequately addresses your needs for your review and hopeful authorization. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or comments. Re ds, t 'P C uck Jones,, Principal Curts Gaines Hall Jones Architects 1213 E. 6th Avenue Tampa, FL 33605 cc: Jeff Handlin Ed Armstrong Octavio Cabrera Phil Graham Michael Delk Scott Rice :'-4?. • ...,tea ..+?n.?p--?,?e.... cm i MAR 1 5 2006 -??- C u r t s Gaines Hall Jo'n Architect 1213 East 6th Avenue, Tampa, Florida, 336054905 Voice (813) 228-8000 Fax (813) 228-0770 Web Site cgh#Dj!ANNJpfr, & MVEe14T SERVICES March 15, 2006 CITY OF CLEARWATER Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 Re: Development Order No. FLD2005-07068 - 401,411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Sienna Sands Condominium Minor Revisions Dear Mr. Wells, It was a pleasure meeting with you and Michael Delk last week to discuss the Sienna Sands project. Per your request here is a brief list of the proposed "minor revisions" as allowed under section 4-406 which have occurred on this proposed development since the Development Order of September 30, 2005. Please refer the current schematic plans and elevations we left with you dated 3/9/06 as well as the plans dated 8/10/05 which were submitted for the original Development Order. Here then is the list of proposed minor revisions for your review; this list is organized per the nine (9) categories of Section 4-406 which states that a minor revision is one which: 1. Does not alter the location of any private street and/or driveway by more than 20 feet. The two driveways along Coronado drive are proposed to be altered by at or less than 20 feet each. Reference the Building Comparison plan: this is as measured from the centerline of the driveways as measured at the property line. Please note that the entry into parking level is now one way in and the exit is one way out. 2. Does not change the use unless such change is of similar or less intensity, as determined by the community development coordinator. No change in use is proposed. 3. Does not increase the density or intensity of the development. No increase in density or intensity is proposed. 4. Does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area. The current proposed plan does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area as required and indicated in the development order. 5. Does not result in a substantial change to the location of a structure previously approved. There is no substantial change to the location of the structure. The overall building footprint and location is very similar to the original plans and remains consistent with the development order. The overall massing is in compliance with Beach by Design. .Yn Sienna Sands Rev. Letter 3.15.2 Page 2 6. Does not result in a substantial modification or cancellation of any condition placed upon the application as originally approved. No substantial modifications or cancellation of any condition of the development order are requested; all of the conditions of the development order will be met. 7. Does not add property to the parcel proposed for development. No property has been added. 8. Does not increase the height of the buildings in a manner that will change the overall height of the project, will not alter the scale of the project, does not exceed the maximum height permitted in by the applicable special area plan and zoning district. The height will remain consistent with the Development Order which allows 100' high to the roof deck with an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments above the roof deck. 9. Any other minor revision that does not substantially alter the character and design of the project. There are a variety of miscellaneous minor revisions as generally listed below. However, it is our opinion that none of these substantially alter the character and design of the project. The materials and color palette proposed remain the same or will be very similar to the original elevations. While the overall composition of the elevations has been modified based, the overall character of the building remains in the same "Italian Mediterranean Tuscan" style/character. The color and basic material pallete are proposed to remain the same. Also, the same or similar architectural elements and features are still being utilized; these include clay barrel tile roofs (or metal roof system which mimics clay tile at the high roof areas); a combination of roof forms including mansards, hips, parapets, and gable ends; trim banding; aluminum railings (wrought iron look); a combination of arched and conventional windows, eave brackets, trim banding, and horizontal stucco banding at the base. As you can see from the east and west elevation profile comparison sketches the overall massing and scale breakdown has remained in a similar scale and character. Various plan modifications including parking and unit reconfiguration do not "substantially alter the character and design of the project in our opinion. Mr. Wells, we hope that you and your colleagues find that this list of minor revisions is clear and adequately addresses your needs for your review and hopeful authorization. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or comments. Re ? Chuck Jones, AIA, Principal Curts Gaines Hall Jones Architects 1213 E. 6th Avenue Tampa, FL 33605 cc: Jeff Handlin Ed Armstrong Octavio Cabrera Phil Graham Michael Delk Scott Rice • • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT . POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 September 30, 2005 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Armstrong: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICF.-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCII \IENfBFR HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSFN, COUNCII MEMBER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE, ACTION EMPLOYER" A '? • • September 30, 2005 Armstrong - Page 2 3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building), as well as the existing overhead electric for streetlights within Coronado Drive, be placed underground. The Utility Plan shall be revised to indicate compliance with this requirement prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That any future signage meet the requirements of Code and any freestanding sign be a monument- style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 5. That the Landscape Plan be amended prior to the issuance of any permits to indicate landscape materials and design for the courtyard area off South Gulfview Boulevard; 6. That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. That approval of this request is subject to the vacation by the City of an existing five-foot wide sidewalk easement on the property. Evidence of such vacation of this easement, as well as written permission to build in the Florida Power Corp. (Progress Energy) easements, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That plans indicate the connection of the decorative architectural pavement to the arcade off South Gulfview Boulevard, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That inconsistencies between the tree removal data on the demolition plan and the tree removal data on the Landscape Plan be addressed, as well as clearly indicating trees to be preserved, prior to the issuance of any permits; 10. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the east elevation drawing of the architectural plans be amended to show the northern motor court and northern ground level entrance to the under building parking area; 11. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy an easement be recorded for the public sidewalk located on the subject property along Coronado Drive; 12. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 13. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; and 15. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original. period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. , W 0 0 September 30, 2005 Armstrong - Page 3 Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-5023 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.p2yclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, r Michael Delk, AI Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished Applications lGulfview S 0401 - 0421 Siena Sands (T) - Approve&Gulrview S 401 - 421 Development Order.doc Message Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 11:55 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2005-07068 (401 S. Gulfview) Page 1 of 1 The proposed conditions of approval are acceptable to the applicant and we would like to be on the consent agenda. Have you received any letters in opposition? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 9/19/2005 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 3:12 PM To: 'lindac@jpfirm.com' Subject: Staff Reports Linda - Attached are the Staff Reports for the following cases scheduled for the September 20, 2005, CDB meeting at 10:00 am: 1. FLD2005-07072 - 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard 2. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - 691 South Gulfview Boulevard 3. FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Please let Ed Armstrong know that the attached Staff Report for 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard has been modified from an earlier version I sent to him the other day. Wayne Gulfview S 655 Gulfview S 691 Gulfview S 401-421 Staff Report.do... Staff Report.do... Staff Repor... ENGELHARDT, HAMMER & ASSOCIATES Planning • Engineering • Landscape Architecture TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Wayne Wells FROM: Ethel Hammer DATE: September 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Community Development Board Cases FLD2005-07068, FLD2005- 07072, FLD2005-06057 CC: Ed Armstrong Herewith 0 Under separate cover DESCRIPTION Dear Mr. Wells, Via courier 0 Hand delivered At the direction of Ed Armstrong, representative for the above mentioned Flexible Development Applications, Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates has been asked to submit our analysis of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code criteria pertaining to these cases to allow for advance review by the Board. Please find enclosed (15) copies of said analysis for each case to distribute to all Community Development Board Members and other interested parties prior to the September 20, 2005 Community Development Board Hearing. We hope this will aid in the comprehensive review process. Should you require anything else or have ar at the number below. Sincerely, Ethel Hammer y questions, please feel free to contact me D or f SEEP 1 3 20,3 I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES e ?.Y. , . CF%....'; ` CL EARWATER 5444 Bay Center Drive, Suite 122, Tampa, FL 33609, Telephone 813 282-3855, Fax 813 286-2308 PI1?,Y1\1DIC. DEPAFIMIENT POST OFF!CE BOX 4745, ,LEARWA.TER, FLORIDA 33758-474.8 MUNICIPAI. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIr1NNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 24, 2005 Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-07068) Dear Mr. Armstrong: The Case No. FLD2005-07068 for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 feet . for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, for property located at 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on September 20, 2005. The meeting will take place at 10:00 a.m. (note time of meeting) in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III S:Tlanning DeparnneiMC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDBIGulfview S 401-421 Siena Sands (T) - 9.20.05 CDB - ~Gulfview S 401 CDB Letter.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR Btu..JONSON, VICE.-NtWOR Jo!!N DOR;\N, COUNCILMEMBE;R HoYT HA` ILTnN, COUNC? MEMBER CARu N A. PETUSEN, COUNCH.MEMBER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AITIRMATIVE. ACTION EMPLOYER" AUG 12 20 ;5 RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS CANTERBURY OAKS, INC. FLD2005-07068 - 401 S. Gulfview Blvd. Siena Sands ?'`'"?`'h'"?U?Or''f GENERAL ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Prior to building permit: A right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the ROW of Gulfview Blvd. Contact Engineering at (727) 562- 4750 in Room 220 at the Municipal Services Building. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Comment No. 2: Prior to CDB applicant shall submit a complete vacation request to Steve Doherty in Public Works/Engineering (727- 562-4773) to vacate 5-foot sidewalk easement recorded in O.R. Book 5255 page 1481 and easement described in Deed Book 508-594. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. We have prepared the application for vacation of the sidewalk and written to the utility companies requesting letters of no objection. We will submit the application as soon as possible. Comment No. 3: All other easements on survey are in the name of Florida Power Corp. (Progress Energy) and applicant will need to submit written permission to build in these easements prior to issuance of a building permit. Response No. 3: Acknowledged. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. ENVIRONMENTAL: Comment No. 1: Prior to CDB. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. Response No. 1: The stormwater treatment is provided by a concrete vault underneath the proposed second story pool deck. The Siena 0 0 Sands project is located adjacent to the Beach Walk project and is designed to be landscaped in a similar manner. In addition, heavy pedestrian traffic will traverse the promenade adjacent to the project. The location of the pond underneath a dead space within the structure has allowed for the addition of additional landscape plantings in addition to the minimum required and minimization of grassed areas. The concrete vault also eliminates an open depressed grass area adjacent to Beach Walk which may present a safety hazard when full of water. Comment No. 2: In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. Response No. 2: A skimmer has been added to the vault control structure which will minimize oil and grease release off-site. The skimmer is typical of retention ponds and is a proven method of minimization. Comment No. 3: Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: Response No. 3: A cross section of the vault has been added to the grading and drainage plan. Comment No. 4: A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Response No. 4: A schedule will be submitted prior to building permit approval. FIRE: Comment No. 1: ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Comment No. 2: This property must be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting all the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 2 0 0 Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Comment No. 3: Provide plans showing the complete fire underground including hydrants, FDCs, fire sprinkler line, backflow preventors PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 3: The plans show the underground fire and potable water system including hydrants, FDC's, fire services and backflow preventors. Comment No. 4: This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by both the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Building Code and Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 4: We acknowledge intent to comply with final building plans. Comment No. 5: Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 5: This note has been added to the utility plan. Comment No. 6: Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 % feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 6: This note has been added to the utility plan. Comment No. 7: All required hydrants shall be in addition to any internal sprinkler or standpipe system serving the building and shall not be located on the fire line water main service. 3 Provide and show on the plan hydrants on the same side of the street and within 300 feet of the most remote point of the building, as the hose is laid, PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 7: An additional fire hydrant has been added to the plans to provide coverage within 300 feet of the most remote point of the building. Comment No. 8: Provide automatic wet standpipe with fire pump providing 100 psi at roof. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 8 Comment No. 9: Response No. 9 Comment No. 10: Response No. 10 HARBOR MASTER: No Comments. LEGAL: No Comments. We acknowledge intent to comply with final building plans. Fire pump must be located above BFE. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. We acknowledge intent to comply with final building plans. Fire command room must be located above BFE. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. We acknowledge intent to comply with final building plans. LAND RESOURCES: Comment No. 1: The tree removal data on the Demo Plan is inconstant with the tree removal data on the Landscape Plan. Provide constant data prior to Building Permit. Response No. 1: Acknowledged prior to building permit. Comment No. 2: Trees to be preserved are hard to distinguish. Provide a more legible plan prior to Building Permit. Response No. 2: Acknowledged prior to building permit. LANDSCAPING: 4 0 0 Comment No. 1: Sheet 5/5 - There is a shading adjacent to property lines that is not indicated what the landscape material is. It may appear to be sod, but is not indicated. Revise. Response No. 1: The sod species has been identified labeled and called out as typical. Comment No. 2: Sheet 5/5 - Ensure that proposed landscaping meets the Fire Department requirements for non-interference with the FHA and the FDC. Coordinate landscaping around these utility devices to have proper clearance. Same is needed for the water meter and backflow preventor to avoid landscaping being trampled. Revise. Response No. 2: The clearance note has been added to the utility plan. PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1: Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727- 562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 1 STORMWATER: Acknowledged. Comment No. 1: Discharge to a City of Clearwater stormwater system requires attenuation and design for the 25-year storm event. Response No. 1: The stormwater calculations are provided Comment No. 2: Provide vault storage calculations. Response No. 2: The stormwater calculations are provided Comment No. 3: Provide vault recovery analysis. Response No. 3: The recovery analysis will be provided prior to building permit once geotechnical reports are prepared. Comment No. 4: What is the method of treatment? Response No. 4: The pond will function as a normally dry treatment pond with a gravel bed. The pond will hold the required treatment volume and recover in the required amount of time. 5 All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. SOLID WASTE: Comment No. 1: Solid waste staging area must connect with street with out curb. please show were recycling carts will be placed for resident use. Response No. 1: Dumpster staging area is delineated and called out on the site plan. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Create continuous right turn lane into both driveways. Response No. 1: A right turn lane is shown on the plans. Comment No. 2: Indicate 20'x 20' sight distance triangles. Response No. 2: The sight triangles are shown on the site and landscape plan. Comment No. 3: H/C parking spaces must be strategically located to the nearest accessible entrance i.e. elevator. Response No. 3: Revised Comment No. 4: Vertical height clearance of parking garage must be 8' 2" to accommodate a h/c van from entrance, route, parking space, and exit. per ADAAG Response No. 4: Vertical height clearance of 8'-6" is provided. Comment No. 5: Ensure that a scaled passenger vehicle (SUV) can enter and exit the helical ramp by showing path. Response No. 5: See revised plans - Sheets A2.01 and A2.02. Comment No. 6: What is the height clearance for the helical ramp? Response No. 6: Vertical height clearance of 8'-6" is provided. Comment No. 7: Provide signage and markings for entrance and exit of helical ramp i.e. Do not enter sign, one-way sign, stop sign with stop bar and directional pavement arrows, where appropriate and per current M.U.T.C.D. Response No. 7: The signage and markings have been added to the site plan. 6 0 0 Comment No. 8: Stop bars must be 4' behind the back edge of sidewalk or crosswalk. Response No. 8: Revised All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O. PLANNING- Comment No. 1: 7112/05 - WW Vacation request needs to be submitted to Engineering now. 7/6/05 - WW Surveys indicate a number of easements on the property, some being FPC easements and others not. How do these easements affect the redevelopment of the site and/or has there been a request to vacate these easements submitted to the Engineering Department? Response No. 1: As to vacation of sidewalk easement, we have prepared the application for vacation and written to the utility companies requesting letters of no objection. We will submit the application as soon as possible. Comment No. 2: Floor plans submitted bare little resemblance to the elevations submitted, as the floor plans do not show many of the windows and doors indicated on the elevations. Revise to indicate the proposed windows and doors. Also show any balconies proposed. Provide the dimensions for balconies, especially the distance of the protrusion from the building face (sometimes into the required setback). Response No. 2: See revised plans. Comment No. 3: 7/12/05 - WW This has been redrawn as a dashed line on the civil and landscape plans and labeled as an "arcade." Unclear what an arcade is. If an overhang, unclear what the overhang is for. Advise/revise. 7 7/6/05 - WW On Sheet 3/5, 4/5, 5/5 and A2.01 there is a line shown outside of the building line of the parking garage parallel with Coronado Drive that is dimensioned at 18.32 feet from Coronado Drive. On all sheets, it is unclear what this line is depicting, since it doesn't look like any building area, nor a sidewalk. Revise/make clear. Response No. 3: The line represents architectural features on the building. See the architectural plans for further detail. Comment No. 4: Provide dimensions of the building on the site plan and building plans. Response No. 4: Dimensions have been added to the plans. Comment No. 5: Floor plans and building elevations lack detail to correlate the undulation of the facade. Building elevations are "fuzzy" or "sketchy," lacking the clarity usually provided with such submissions. There appears to be three buildings (Units J,K & L appear to be one building together with the parking garage, separate from the northern, taller building, separate from the townhouse building with Units M, N & O), yet I see no break in the building (north to south). The townhouses (with their roofs) are not clearly depicted on the west elevation. Revise/clarify. Response No. 5: See revised plans. Comment No. 6: Place a note on Sheet 3/5 that the equipment is on the roof and/or provide showing the a/c units. Response No. 6: Note has been added to plan. air conditioning a rooftop plan Comment No. 7: Revise Exhibit B, Description of Request, under "a" - There are only 54 residential units permitted today under current rules (not 55). Revise. Response No. 7: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 8: Revise the request to that indicated by Staff above. Response No. 8: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 9: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be 8 0 0 consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; Response No. 9: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 10: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument- style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; Response No. 10: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 11: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Response No. 11: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 12: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; Response No. 12: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 13: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; Response No. 13: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. 9 0 0 Comment No. 14: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Response No. 15: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 15: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Response No. 15: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 16: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; Response No. 16: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 17: Sheets 3/5, 4/5, 5/5 and A2.01 - There is a pedestrian plaza with "decorative architectural pavers" indicated between the South Gulfview Blvd. right--of-way line and the building, including a "V" indentation toward Coronado Drive. It is my understanding that on the east end of this "V," even though it isn't shown on the drawings, that there is an entrance into the building lobby. Since this is a residential building and there is no commercial uses trying to draw people into the property, this "decorative architectural pavers" appears excessive. This should be cut back considerably and rather provided with large areas of landscaping for the benefit of the condo owners, potentially into a garden courtyard. Revise all appropriate sheets. Response No. 17: The plaza has been revised to reduce the pavement and add a gate along the property line. Comment No. 18: Revise Sheet 3/5 in the Site Data Table for the "required" "multi-family units" from 60 units to 59 units. Response No. 18: Done Comment No. 19: Revise the written scale of Sheet 3/5 from 1 inch = 60 feet to 1 inch = 30 feet. Response No. 19: Done Comment No. 20: Since a large portion of the building is located within the VE Flood Zone, use of certain areas on the ground floor may be restricted as to use or construction, such as storage. 10 Check with Development Services regarding restrictions within the VE Flood Zone. Response No. 20: Acknowledged. Comment No. 21: Sheet A3.03 - The parking garage portion is not shown on the west elevation. Revise. Response No. 21: See revised plans. Comment No. 22: Sheet A3.01 - Indicate on the drawing the dividing line between the east and south elevations. Response No. 22: See revised plans. Comment No. 23: Sheet A3.01 - Based on the east elevation, the east side of the parking garage undulates with bases with columns above, columns, etc. This, however, is not translated onto Sheets A2.01, A2.02 and Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5. The civil plans indicate an "arcade" (see prior comment). Show this undulating facade of the garage on these sheets, including setbacks to the front property line of S. Gulfview Blvd. Response No. 23: This has been detailed on the plans and removed the wood arcade. Comment No. 24: Gates are indicated on Sheet A3.01 at the driveway entrances into the ground level parking that are not indicated on Sheet 3/5. Revise Sheet 3/5. Response No. 24: This is corrected and revised. Comment No. 25: Revised Sheet A2.03 (Level 6) indicates "club below" north of the helical ramp, yet Revised Sheet A2.02 (Levels 2-5) does not indicate any such club. If there is a "club," describe its characteristics as part of the narrative. Response No. 25: These areas are resident only amenity features. Comment No. 26: Revised Elevations (Sheets A3.01, A3.02 and A3.03) indicate the height of the building to the flat roof deck. Parapets are indicated to only be 2.5 feet above the roof deck, which is not correct. Indicate through dimensioning the heights of all perimeter parapets, as any parapet greater than 2.5 feet needs to be part of the request. 11 0 0 Also, these elevations indicate other features that extend above the roof deck that are dimensioned to be the Code maximum of 16 feet. However, there are features that extend to approximately 21 feet above the roof deck. Dimension all of these features, also indicating what the feature is (elevator, stairs, trash chute, mechanical rooms, etc.), as anything above 16 feet needs to be part of the request. Response No. 26: These elements are at 16'-0". Most parapets are at 2'-6" above roof slab. Addition areas of "gable" roof ends used as mechanical covers or as architectural features are shown as 8'- 6" above roof slab. So a request of 8'-6" is made. Comment No. 27: Revised West Elevation (Sheet A3.03) indicates stairs at the townhomes and from the pool area to S. Gulfview Blvd. These stairs need to be indicated on the floor plans (Sheets A2.01 and A2.02) and on the civil plans (Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5). May need to be included in the request as setback reductions. Response No. 27: (<INP'UT>> Comment No. 28: Sheet A3.01 - East elevation does not indicate the northern motor court and northern ground level parking entrance. Revise. Response No. 28: It is now enhanced and more clearly shown. Comment No. 29: Sheet A3.01 (East Elevation) - Fencing with columns are indicated on the elevation, but is not indicated on Sheet A2.01, nor any of the civil plans (Sheet 315, 4/5 or 5/5). Potentially some of the fencing/columns, if located in the front setback area, will need to be advertised as to setback reductions and/or fence height increases. Need to also indicate on Sheet A3.01 and all other appropriate sheets the heights of the fencing and columns. Response No. 29: All fencing on east is behind setbacks. On the west where the Beach Walk meets the plaza, a solely resident area, the fence is on a curve touching the property line at one point. A setback request is made here to enhance site security. Comment No. 30: Sheet A3.01, A3.02 and A3.03 indicates in the Building Materials Legend "M-8" for a decorative canvas awning with aluminum frame. I do not find such on the elevations. 12 Response No. 30: There are 3 areas on the lower floors. These are noted more directly. Comment No. 31: To assist the Planning staff to interpret, understand and coordinate the undulation of the building on the building elevations, could the architectural plans include a lettering system (A to Z) on the floor plans and the elevations that are to points of deviation in the building facade? Response No. 31: A grid A to Z column line is now shown. In addition, a scaled model is included by separate cover. Comment No. 32: General Applicability criteria #1 - Provide detailed information as to HOW the proposed project is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. It is acceptable to talk about changes to the subject site, but the response needs to address the adjacent properties. Response No. 32: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 33: General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide detailed information as to HOW the proposed project is consistent with the character of properties in the immediate vicinity. Provide specific information, not general information. Response No. 33: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 34: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Lots of information has been provided about the proposal, but little has been provided as to HOW the proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards." Provide the justification for the reductions, increases and other deviations requested. Response No. 34: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 35: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Provide justification as to HOW the proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses (specific examples). Response No. 35: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 36: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 - Provide information as to HOW this proposal creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the 13 subject property and to Clearwater generally (provide specific information). Response No. 36: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 37: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - Regarding "setbacks," it is unclear what of "Beach Walk" is being incorporated into the project, especially from a visual aspect relating to reduced setbacks. Much of the information provided is nice, but doesn't speak as to HOW the flexibility regarding setbacks and height are "justified by the benefits to community character" of the immediate vicinity and Clearwater generally. Provide specific information justifying both the setback reductions AND the height increase. Response No. 37: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 38: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #10 - Paragraph on Page 7 regarding height of the building, parapets and elevator/mechanical equipment needs to ensure that the parapet, elevator/mechanical equipment and "architectural embellishments" heights discussed in this paragraph are consistent with what will be requested (see prior comment regarding such improvements above the roof deck that must be part of the request). It is mentioned about a "club." Provide what is meant by a "club" in relation to this residential project. Response No. 38: See revised Exhibit "B". OTHER: No Comments 8/12/2005 3:47 PM 46256.110172 #352042 v1 - CANTERBERY/Response to Comments (FLD2005-07068) 14 x- - r Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 8:33 AM To: Rick Gilett (E-mail) Cc: Jayne Sears (E-mail); Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FW: FLD2005-07068 - 401 S. Gulfview Rick - Please provide a response to Scott Rice (copy me) ASAP. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 4:22 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FW: FLD2005-07068 - 410 S. Gulfview Wayne, A vacation request has been submitted. Traffic still has questions regarding the operation of the dual helix. It appears that conflict points exist at each floor for the following conditions: 1. Vehicles wishing to exit from middle floors are required to traverse across the upward bound helix lane. What type of traffic control would be used to minimize conflicts? Stop sign and bar for vehicles entering helix? 2. Over some distance, vehicles going up and down within the helix will be at the same elevation. What will be used to separate lanes and avoid one vehicle sideswiping the other? 3. If a resident is leaving from an upper floor and changes their mind and wishes to return to the upper floor, is it possible to change lanes in the "common" area at each floor? Is there sufficient sight distance for vehicles to see and react to each other under this condition? D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:22 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005-07068 - 410 S. Gulfview Wayne, Remaining issues: Civil Engineering 1. Prior to CDB, applicant shall submit a complete vacation request to Steve Doherty in Public Works/Engineering (727-562-4773) to vacate 5-foot sidewalk easement recorded in O.R. Book 5255 page 1481 and easement described in Deed Book 508-594. 8/18/05 - NOT SUBMITTED r+- • Traffic • 5. Ensure that a scaled passenger vehicle (SUV) can enter and exit the helical ramp by showing path. 8/18/05 - NOT PROVIDED Let me know if you have any questions. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 11:02 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: Revised Draft DRC comments for FLD2005-07068, Siena Sands Jayne - Here are the updated, revised Draft DRC comments for the above project. Hope this helps (it's done!!!!!!). Thanks for your patience. Wayne "Ito, draft 8.4.05 dre action agenda... Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:32 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: Current version of Draft DRC comments for FLD2005-07068, Siena Sands Jayne - Here is the current comments for the above referenced case. I will update you later (or at the meeting) with revised Planning and Landscaping comments. This will get you going somewhat with other Department reviews. Wayne draft 8.4.05 dre action agenda... LL 0 CITY OF CLEORWATER o Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. C OM July 12, 2005 E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757 RE: FLD2005-07068 -- 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07068. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 04, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 11 < [/!ix Wa e Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-07068 - 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 1:52 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07068, 401-421 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jayne - Letter of Completeness attached. Original being mailed. Wayne letter of ,mpleteness 7.12.05 o tilt , • Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning 422-05 Client 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keithCaD-keithzayac.com July 11, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells ORIGINAL City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-07068-401 S GULFVIEW BLVD. - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Wells: 1.) Provide a stormwater narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. A stormwater narrative has been added to the stormwater calculations. 2.) Provide in the site data table on Sheet 315 the number of existing overnight accommodation units. Also, provide on Sheet 315 the calculation of how the proposed 100 units is calculated. The site data table has been revised to show the existing overnight accommodations and how the units are calculated. 3.) Surveys indicate a large portion of the site is within the FEMA VE 13 and VE 14 flood zones. -Building elevations indicate BFE of 12. Revise plans to indicate compliance with the higher FEMA standards for VE. Revise Note #13 on Sheet 3/5. The site plan flood zone note has been revised to show the VE zones. The plans call for uninhabited parking areas to be below the flood zgne elevation only. 4.) Surveys indicate a number of easements on the property, some being FPC easements and others not. How do these easements affect the redevelopment of the site and/or has there been a request to vacate these easements submitted to the Engineering Department? The existing easements are currently being coorcfinated with appropriate utility companies. Vacation requests and letters will be forwarded to engineering as part of the vacationtplatting process. 5.) Floor plans have been provided for Levels 1-6. Provide floor plans for Levels 7-10. Additionally, based on Levels 2-6 and the individual floor plans for the various units, I don't know where a Unit A is used. N-A Building plans have been revised as requested. V E JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT OITV OF CLEARWATER • ORI* 422-05 Client 6.) Floor plans submitted bare little resemblance to the elevations submitted, as the floor plans do not show many of the windows and doors indicated on the elevations. Revise to indicate the proposed windows and doors. Also show balconies proposed. Provide the dimensions for balconies, especially the distance of the protrusion from the building face (sometimes into the required setback). Building plans have been revised as requested. 7.) Parking under the building from the northern driveway is laid out different on the civil site plan Sheet 3/5 than the architectural plans Sheet A2.01 does not indicate the stairwells shown on Sheet A2.02 (nor any of the sidewalk accesses to a public space per Building Code). Also, I only count 52 spaces on Level 1 (Sheet A2.01), not 54. Revise. Plans have been revised to coordinate stairwells, parking and add sidewalk access. 8.) There is paved vehicular use area proposed outside of the building. Provide the "proposed" square footage in the site data table on Sheet 315. If the proposed paved vehicular use area outside of the building is over 4,000 square feet, must provide 12% interior landscape area. If required, provide the square footage of the interior landscaping and the percentage of the vehicular use area in the site data table on Sheet 315. If interior landscaping is required, depict by shading or crosshatching all the required parking lot interior landscaped areas. The vehicular area is added to the site plan notes, which is under 4y000 sf. Therefore no interior landscape calculations are provided 9.) Show the location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling area and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201 (D) (i) and Index #701). No trash in rooms shown. Indicate location of air conditioning equipment. The trash handling room has been added to the plans. The outside mechanical equipment will be on the roof and screened by the proposed parapet. 10.)Show on the civil site plan sheets and Sheet A2.01 all proposed sidewalks, including all from stairwells connecting to the public sidewalks in the right-of-way. Sidewalks have been added to the civil plan connecting to the public sidewalk. 11.)Show all sight visibility triangles at the street intersections on Sheet 3/5 and 5/5. A site visibility triangle has been added to the public intersection previously missing. 12.)On Sheet 315, 4/5, 5/5 and A2.01 there is a line shown outside of the building line of the parking garage parallel with Coronado Drive that is dimensioned at 18.32 feet from Coronado Drive. On all sheets, it is unclear what line is depicting, since it doesn't look like any building area, nor sidewalk. Revise/make dear. The solid line has been revised to a dashed line to clarify the overhand and outside arcade area along the front of the building. { 13.)Provide dimensions of the building on the site plan and building plans. Additional dimensions have been added to the building. PLANNING DEURTMENT OITV OF CLEARWATEp ..A I NA L 422-05 Client 0 . 14.)Floor plans and building elevations lack detail to correlate the undulation of the fagade. Building elevations are "fuzzy" or "sketchy," lacking the clarity usually provided with such submissions. There appears to be three buildings (Units J,K & L appear to be one building together with the parking garage, separate from the northern, taller building, separate from the townhouse building with Units M,N & Q), yet I see no break in the building (north to south). The townhouses (with their roofs) are not clearly depicted on the west elevation. The parking garage portion is not shown on the west elevation. Provide the south elevation. Revisetclarify. The enclosed building plans have been revised to further clarify the design intent as requested. 15-)Provide the proposed colors and materials of the exterior walls and building features on the building elevations. Provide color samples/chips of the proposed exterior colors. Enclosed are color and material color samples for the exterior of the building. 16.)The comprehensive Sign Program is not available to residential projects. Revise/eliminate Note #14 on Sheet 3/5. Indicate the location and details of proposed signage. Indicate at least through notes as to what is happening to all existing signage. The signage note has been revised to show the existing signage as being removed, and the proposed signage to be attached to the building and cordbrm to code- Since , i` Keith yak, P.E., R.L.A. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. RECEVED .I0L 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 3 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:21 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005-07068, 401 - 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. Thanks, I think. I mean thanks for letting us know. I've forwarded it around to the "team" and we'll take care of it. I'm anxious to hear about Enchantment. Are you reviewing that one - 691 S. Gulfview? -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 8:24 AM To: Jayne E. Sears Subject: FLD2005-07068, 401 - 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jayne - Letter of incompleteness attached. Original being mailed. Wayne <<letter of incompleteness 7.7.05.pdf>> 1 Clearwater July 07, 2005 E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757 CITY OF CLEW,RWATER PARTMENT PLANNING DE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM RE: FLD2005-07068 -- 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07068. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. J 1. Provide a stormwater narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. 2. Provide in the site data table on Sheet 3/5 the number of existing overnight accommodation units. Also, provide on Sheet 3/5 the calculation of how the proposed 100 units is calculated. 43. Surveys indicate a large portion of the site is within the FEMA VE 13 and VE 14 flood zones. Building elevations indicate BFE of 12. Revise plans to indicate compliance with the higher FEMA standards for VE. Revise Note #13 on Sheet 3/5. Surveys indicate a number of easements on the property, some being FPC easements and others not. How do these easements affect the redevelopment of the site and/or has there been l a request to vacate these easements submitted to the Engineering Department? J 5. Floor plans have been provided for Levels 1 - 6. Provide floor plans for Levels 7 - 10. Additionally, based on Levels 2 - 6 and the individual floor plans for the various units, I don't know where a Unit A is used. Floor plans submitted bare little resemblance to the elevations submitted, as the floor plans do not show many of the windows and doors indicated on the elevations. Revise to indicate the proposed windows and doors. Also show any balconies proposed. Provide the dimensions for balconies, especially the distance of the protrusion from the building face (sometimes into the required setback). J7. Parking under the building from the northern driveway is laid out different on the civil site plan Sheet 3/5 than the architectural plans Sheet A2.01. Sheet A2.01 does not indicate the stairwells shown on Sheet A2.02 (nor any of the sidewalk accesses to a public space per Building Code). Also, I only count 52 spaces on Level 1 (Sheet A2.01), not 54. Revise. J8. There is paved vehicular use area proposed outside of the building. Provide the "proposed" square footage in the site data table on Sheet 3/5. If the proposed paved vehicular use area outside of the building is over 4,000 square feet, must provide 12% interior landscape area. If required, provide the square footage of the interior landscaping and the percentage of the vehicular use area in the site data table on Sheet 3/5. If interior landscaping is required, depict by shading or crosshatching all the required parking lot interior landscaped areas. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-07068 - 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 ' Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM July 07, 2005 J9. Show the location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701 } . No trash rooms shown. Indicate location of air conditioning equipment. 0. Show on the civil site plan sheets and Sheet A2.01 all proposed sidewalks, including all from stairwells connecting to the public sidewalks in the rights-of-way. X11. Show all sight visibility triangles at the street intersections on Sheets 3/5 and 515. On Sheet 3/5, 4/5, 515 and A2.01 there is a line shown outside of the building line of the parking garage parallel with Coronado Drive that is dimensioned at 18.32 feet from Coronado Drive. On all sheets, it is unclear what this line is depicting, since it doesn't look like any building area, nor a sidewalk. Revise/make clear. 13. Provide dimensions of the building on the site plan and building plans. 14. Floor plans and building elevations lack detail to correlate the undulation of the facade. Building elevations are "fuzzy" or "sketchy," lacking the clarity usually provided with such submissions. There appears to be three buildings (Units J,K & L appear to be one building together with the parking garage, separate from the northern, taller building, separate from the townhouse building with Units M, N & O), yet I see no break in the building (north to south). The townhouses (with their roofs) are not clearly depicted on the west elevation. The parking garage portion is not shown on the west elevation. Provide the south elevation. Revise/clarify. Jl 5. Provide the proposed colors and materials of the exterior walls and building features on the building elevations. Provide color samples/chips of the proposed exterior colors. x/16. The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available to residential projects. Revise/eliminate Note #14 on Sheet 3/5. Indicate the location and details of proposed signage. Indicate at least through notes as to what is happening to all existing signage. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by noon, July 11, 2005 (one original and 14 copies of all amended application materials). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, l? /,I • ha Wayn Wells Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-07068 - 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD 0 0 Wells, Wayne wnm? From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 8:24 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07068, 401 - 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jayne - Letter of incompleteness attached. Original being mailed. Wayne Ill. letter of completeness 7.7.0, 10 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 5:30 PM To: 'nicholas fritsch' Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: 401 etc S Gulfview Nick - 1. This is a decision of the Planning Director to not offer a Staff recommendation for these time extension requests, as he feels that this is something the Board should make a decision on as whether to grant the request or not and, if to grant, then the length of the time extension. The applicant is requesting a one year time extension. We will be listing these time extension requests on the Consent portion of the Agenda. If the Board is comfortable with the request (including the length of the time extension) and does not need to discuss it, then you may leave it on Consent. If it is something the Board wants to discuss, then a Board member(s) should pull it off Consent and allow for discussion. This is only the beginning of probably many similar requests. 2. The Code provides a two-year time frame after issuance of the building permit to obtain the Certificate of Occupancy. This request is to extend the time frame to submit for a building permit. 3. In the Time Extension granted by Mr. Delk (attached to the Memorandum for the CDB), it was noted that the site and building plans submitted and approved as a Minor Revision on June 6, 2006, provided for two parking spaces per dwelling unit. The Code directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. A project previously approved by the CDB is vested to the regulations in effect at the time of such approval, such as the provision of parking spaces less than two spaces per dwelling unit, until such time as the CDB does not approve the time extension or the approval lapses due to non-submittal for a building permit within the allotted time frame. 4. Listing a time extension reference in the index is a good idea. We will see about putting this in an upcoming Code amendment. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: nicholas fritsch [mailto:nfritsch@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:43 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 401 etc S Gulfview Why is there no staff rec.? If exten. is app'd, does the CO timeframe automatically reset too? In the last portion of this sec. Ammendments requiring major revision.... Does the revision of parking to 2 spaces consitute a major revision and req. new app.? Also, the Request for Time Extension is not shown in the Index of the code under any of the 3 words, it would be nice if it listed it. I think we'll be seeing a lot of these. Thanks, Nick 11/19/2006 0 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP ? ( Planning III ' `? RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard DATE: November 8, 2006 Attached is information related to the request by Ed Armstrong, on behalf of Canterbury Property Management, Inc., Canterbury Oaks, Inc. and Nikana Holdings, LLC, for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on March 20, 2008. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted a six-month extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order June 20, 2006 Maps and Photos S:OanningDepartmen6CD BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished Applications lGulfview S 0401 - 0421 Siena Sands (T) - ApprovedlGulfview S 401 - 421 Time Extension Memorandum for 11.21.06 CDB.doc JOHNSGO POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & A RNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M. FLYNN RYAN C. GRIFFIN R1NAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.* SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIH-PIN LU* MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE BRETON H. PERMESLY F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS KIMBERLY L. SHARPE JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO.46256.110172 November 7, 2006 Via Email and Hand Delivery Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Case No. FLD2005-07068 Dear Michael: On behalf of the applicant and property owners, Canterbury Oaks, Inc., Canterbury Property Management, Inc. and Nikana Holdings, LLC, we hereby request n-additional-extension of the time to initiate a building permit for the referenced project, for a period of one-year, to March 20, 2008. As set forth in the amended development order, you previously granted a six-month extension to March 20, 2007. The reason for this request for the additional extension is that the development of the project has been delayed due to deteriorating market conditions. We understand that this request for extension must be reviewed by the Community Development Board In accordance with Section 4-407 of the Clearwater Community Development Code. Please schedule this matter for the November 21, 2006 CDB meeting. If you need any additional information in order to set this matter for hearing, please contact my legal assistant, Jayne Sears, or me as soon as possible. CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 D NOV PLANN'!n10 A • DEVELOPMENT -_R TAMPA OFFICE 403 EAST MADISON ST. SUITE 400 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-1100) TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Michael Delk, AICP November 7, 2006 Page 2 We thank you and the Board for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP y E. D. Armstrong III EDA/js cc: Mr. Martin R. Cole #389216 v1 0 0 ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPAMNENT 40 Pos-r Orr•I(a: Box 4748, CLFARWATHR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 `A MUNICIPAL Srwici:s BUILDING, 100 So( rrl MY?Irrr.I: AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 r .xrz I'GLITHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG Rmci; PIANNING Dfivl?I.OPMI?NT Rfivliiw June 20, 2006 Mr. Martin R. Cole Canterbury Property Management, Inc. 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33767 RE: FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Cole: On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement),-a-reduction-to-the rear_(west)=setbackJrom20-feet_to_15-feet_(to._bu d- ng)-and-an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request. This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. Since the approval of this project the Code requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per unit. Since the Minor Revision process was recently approved on June 6, 2006, the plans approved only included 199 parking spaces for the 100 dwelling units in the project (where 200 parking spaces would now be required). We are in receipt of revised plans from your architect now showing a total of 201 parking spaces to be provided. This revised plan now meets the new Code parking requirement. FRANK I I111,1c.AND. \1:Ut R knit:. D(wr\-.\, G)I "?r.n.wauMT IIm-1 IOmur:WII'NIIIMHr:a Iiu.i.Jn,\Sne, 0 WN(:iuUfNIhFN (::MU.r.? \. I'i.rr:rses, Crn ;?c:u_ n mi;r, "{caAl. I?.MIT )1 NIFN I ANA) Arrii,,m. nvi•: Ac:rR>X I{-MrL(n itR June 20, 2006 Cole - Page Two 0 On June 8, 2006, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited the problem of changing architectural firms, the process of revising plans through the Minor Revision procedure that was recently completed on June 6, 2006, construction costs affecting the design of the project, coordination of issues of construction scheduling interfacing with the City's Beach Walk project and economic conditions that have slowed sales of units. Since the approval of this project, Section 6-109.B of the Code has been amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use, which affects this project. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. In considering the above changes to the Code, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension to March 20, 2007, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard. Site and building plans to be submitted to obtain building permits to construct the approved improvements will need to reflect the provision of at least 200 parking spaces for this 100-unit attached dwelling project, in addition to those items listed in the Minor Revision Development Order of June 6, 2006. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above; whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished Applications lGulfview S 0401 - 0421 Siena Sands (T) - ApprovedIGulfview S 401 - 421 Time Extension Development Order 6.20.06doc 1] Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4504 wayne.wells(a,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL 0 November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; reviewed building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director, Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; supervised six employees; prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations, of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • 0 • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; drafted ordinance revisions; general research. • Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1'/z years; worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section &IYMOM S7 U W m a ? ? 3N W ? g H Pow ?i % PAPAYA [$ST iu ppµy PASSES j 8 ? t D 4 PWeD O Cese.mY aw WNDWARD P eR b Q AR37 ?aD 1 1 DR ,• THIRD 87 37 PROJECT °J' o 0 SITE m SRK3H7 WA7Sit DR 7 Si W H4VSDE e BLVD VD BL e r s ? . A? SS ° a Location Map Canterbury Property Management, Inc.; TLS Owners: Holdings, Inc.; Canterbury Oaks, Inc; Case: FLD2005-07068 Dorothy Boldo , Trustee for M & J Trust Site: 401, 411 and 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. Property 1 994 Size(Acres) : . 07/29/15/52380/000/1280 07/29/15/52380/000/1270 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0760 07/29/15/52380/000/0740 07/29/15/52380/000/0720 Atlas Page: 276A 0 0 • • 1 V 1 341 347 f 1 _ ?n 1351 ', 1 _J 11 1 1 ,'^ w- ^ 1_..-_ ? - ?_ 3sjd ? _ 3?5 r 11 ? f I ? ^I 1 `- _-! ---1 1347 It ? ` 356 -------1 1 - ! 1363 ??df'- ------I O IJ/l\ ' ;,--------; ?;? --; P P 405 411 1`405,- 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 __ t I 410 , ilk` w O 1 _------- - ?? -' 1 - "- 412 421 '-= f ! 1431 i I-7 42 Df 1 ' 1 143+? \ ' _ ? ? ___ 31 \ ' ' 4 O t c qA? L ? r i ' P , \ ; V 445 ph5 I - 1_J 1 - r Ir f Zoning Map Canterbury Property Management, Inc.; TLS Owners: Holdings, Inc.; Canterbury Oaks, Inc; Case: FLD2005-07068 Dorothy Boldo , Trustee for M & J Trust Site: 401, 411 and 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. Property 1 994 Size (Acres) . 07/29/15/52380/000/1280 07/29/15/52380/000/1270 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0760 07/29/15/52380/000/0740 07/29/15/52380/000/0720 Atlas Page: 276A • • t _ ?_- 6 ? a?, yi I - ? O ? ?„ BR/Gy?AT ER p 3 Rista an s O - = - O 1 X __ , I 45 It --_ / Ill "`f444..? er /I ?yI ,yam,; 13471 Y as 1 -_1 355 a10 Y l 3-53 5 --- F/may ? ------, ST J ' 408 4 11 t Beach - ? I , hed- aft os ?l ? - -, ?ings ? v 7?,- 1`-'r ? ? , - , 410 ------- 1415 ; > ,, ?-?_ e1dc esd; vK in -' - -- , 412 4-= ------- , 421 t eIrni? bt ` BA t 1.l 4 t. - rnlg?tl a om o n I t , ta?pr tt-, a,pl mo ) ? Nwe , Olvernight ' I ackommodation ' ' 1 I ?'3 rnigA gat It 430 -- ; t y comilno fio?s ` I I OP ? 446 - '? ernight LAttacheddwe0ings a co lec?atio 514 I % Existing Surrounding Uses Map Canterbury Property Management, Inc.; TLS Owners: Holdings, Inc.; Canterbury Oaks, Inc; Case: FLD2005-07068 Dorothy Boldo , Trustee for M & J Trust Site: 401, 411 and 421 S. Gulfview Bivd. Property 1.994 Size(Acres): 07/29/15/52380/000/1280 07/29/15152380/000/1270 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0760 07/29/15/52380/0001074Q 07/29/15/52380/000/0720 Atlas Page: 276A • gas -??? ?' V r? "'. ? ? l ,w?1, '?.,•?.{ .1l MM S C2 - View looking nortlwest at 401 S. Gulfview Blvd. from Coronado Drive View looking northwest at 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. from Coronado Drive 401 - 421 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005-07068 d a Ah ak Page 1 of 2 View looking northeast at 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. from S. Gulfview Blvd. View looking west at parking lot along west side of Coronado Drive for 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. View looking northwest at motelV on north side of 5'1' Street between Coronado Dr & S. Gulfview Blvd -,w View lookinw north at development on east side of Coronado Drive east of subject property 401 - 421 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005-07068 BEER -WINE View looking at motel at 445 S. Gulfview Blvd south of subject property ?•i Zvi a i? ?i •?? I _., ?at? View looking southwest at 430 S (existing Adams Mark Hotel Gulfview Blvd Page 2 of 2 View looking at development on east side of S. Gulfview Blvd south of subject property View looking south at restaurant at southeast corner of 5t' Street and Coronado Drive 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 4:44 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Needed Information I do not have the accurate acreage for the Red Roof Inn property, but utilizing the Property Appraiser information and subtracting from the overall property the Travelodge and retail sales properties, it appears the Red Roof Inn property is approximately 0.755 acre in size. The Staff Report indicated that there is 73 rooms at the Red Roof Inn. Based on these numbers, the approximate existing density as a hotel is 96+ rooms/units per acre. -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:42 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Needed Information Thanks Wayne - do you know the density for just the Red Roof Inn? -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 1:12 PM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Thompson, Neil; Schodtler, John Subject: Needed Information 1. 401-421 South Gulfview Boulevard (Siena Sands; fka Travelodge and Red Roof Inn) - This was approved by the CDB under FLD2005-07068 on September 20, 2005. There was a total of 127 overnight accommodation units existing on two of the parcels (Travelodge: 54 rooms/units; Red Roof Inn: 73 rooms/units), which was converted to 95 dwelling units. A third parcel was developed commercially and yielded five additional dwelling units. A total of 100 dwelling units was approved under this proposal. The total land area is 1.994 acres, which with the 100 dwelling units approved, produces an approved density of 50.15 dwelling units/acre. 2. 229 Coronado Drive (Sunrise) - This was approved by the CDB under FLD2005-07061 on September 20, 2005. There was 22 overnight accommodation units existing, which was converted to 16 dwelling units. The land area was 0.454 acres, which with the 16 dwelling units approved, produces an approved density of 35.24 dwelling units per acre. -----Original Message----- From: Schodtler, John Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 11:41 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Needed Information Wayne, can you help Gina out here. I know there was a tricky termination of non-conforming density here. 1. How many hotel units exist 2. and are permitted. 3. How many residential du's exist 4. and are permitted. John S. -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 11:23 AM To: Schodtler, John Cc: Thompson, Neil Subject: Needed Information • Hey John - could you help me get some information requested by a Councilman? Would you provide me with the density of the Red Roof Inn on the Beach and the hotel located at 229 Coronado - I think its called the Sunrise. I need this by the end of the week if possible. Thanks! Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.clayton@myclearwater.com <mailto:gina.clayton@myclearwater.com> 727-562-4587 FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: +v7- VS- 614-0 Phone: fD-7- 2.0 (o- (4 3 0 7 FROM: Q- Phone:?2-? to Z - l? ?}- DATE:. 1-9 43 1 10J RE: S 'l 4 y?l S fi?? a +D 1 ,x-11 + 4z.1 S . Cj v;cc ?l ?? . NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Fl??r p?w.?.1 ? i . ? 1 s Oct. 13 2005 05:02PM YOUR LOGO CityO£Clearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 914075136940 Oct.13 04:57PM 04'50 SND 16 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). • s ORIGINAL CDB Meeting Date: September 20, 2005 Case Numbers: FLD2005-07068 Agenda Item: G11 Owner: Canterbury Property Management, Inc., TLS Holdings, Inc., CanterburX Oaks, Inc. and Dorothy C. Boldog, Trustee for M & J Trust Applicant: Canterbury Property Management, Inc. Representative: Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP Address: 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C. EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District; Residential Facilities High (RFH) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 1.994 acres total (1.827 acres developed with overnight accommodation uses and 0.167 acre developed with retail sales) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodation use of a total of 127 rooms/units (Travelodge: 54 rooms/units; Red Roof Inn: 73 rooms/units) and retail sales Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (100 condominiums) Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07068 - Page 1 of 11 0 9 ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Tourist District; Overnight accommodation use and LAND USES: restaurants East: Tourist District; Overnight accommodation uses South: Tourist Districts; Restaurant, retail sales and overnight accommodation uses West: Open Space/Recreation and Tourist Districts; Beach, restaurant, retail sales and overnight accommodation use CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is tourist-dominated area with a mixture of attached dwellings (condominium), overnight accommodation uses and tourist-oriented commercial uses. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.994 acres is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive at the intersection with Fifth Street. The site is triple fronted with 359 feet of frontage on South Gulfview Boulevard (west), 458 feet of frontage on Coronado Drive (east) and 211 feet of frontage on Stn Street (north). The site is currently developed with a five- story, 54-room Travelodge overnight accommodation use on the north side (401 South Gulfview Boulevard), a 1,500 square-foot retail store at 411 South Gulfview Boulevard and a 73-room Red Roof Inn on the south (421 South Gulfview Boulevard). The Travelodge building is located on the north and west sides of the site, with parking accessed off Coronado Drive. The Red Roof Inn is situated between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive, with parking to the south of the building within that extension of property along Coronado Drive. The retail sales building is oriented toward South Gulfview Boulevard, located between the two overnight accommodation uses. Properties to the north of Stn Street are developed with an overnight accommodation use and restaurants. Properties to the east are developed with overnight accommodation uses, as well are properties to the south. The beach is to the west, with the existing/former Adams Mark overnight accommodation use to the southwest. Properties to the west of the southern "finger" of the subject property are developed with a restaurant and retail sales uses. Proposal: The proposal includes the complete demolition of all existing site improvements for all three existing buildings and the construction of a new 11-story residential building of 100 dwelling units. The residential portion of the new building is located on the northern rectangular portion of the property, with a six-story parking garage located on the southern "finger" portion of the property extending along Coronado Drive. There is also proposed parking under the residential portion of the building. The proposal includes a request to Terminate the Status of the Nonconformity for the nonconforming density for the existing 127-room/unit overnight accommodation uses on the property. Based on current Land Use Category density limitations of 40 units/rooms per acre for Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07068 - Page 2 of 11 0 0 overnight accommodations or 30 dwelling units per acre for dwelling units, the overall subject site may be redeveloped with a maximum of 79 rooms/units for overnight accommodations or 59 dwelling units. The applicant is requesting to terminate the nonconforming density in order to demolish the existing overnight accommodation uses and rather now build 95 attached dwelling units, based on a 40/30 conversion factor (the retail sales parcel that is part of this proposal produces five dwelling units at a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre). Under the Tennination of Status of Nonconformity provisions, there are four required improvements: 1. Installation of perimeter buffers. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Improvement of off-street parking lots. The applicant is removing all existing improvements and is providing parking that exceeds Code provisions either under the residential portion of the building or in the six levels of the parking garage on the south side adjacent to Coronado Drive. 3. Removal of nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures. The applicant is removing all existing improvements. Any future signage will need to meet current Code provisions. 4. Use of Comprehensive Sign Program and Comprehensive Landscape Programs to satisfy requirements. The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available under the Code to residential properties. The Comprehensive Landscape Program is unnecessary. The Code provisions of Sections 6-109.B and C require Level Two approval of the Termination of Status of Nonconformity and reconstruction complying with all other Code requirements. The proposal includes reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building). The building has been designed to meet the required 15-foot front setback along Coronado Drive. Traffic Engineering has required the installation of a deceleration lane along Coronado Drive beginning north of the northern driveway and running southward to the southern driveway. This City requirement produces a zero front setback to pavement, which required its inclusion in the advertisement of this request as a reduction to the front (east) setback. This requirement for the deceleration lane also pushed the seven-foot wide public sidewalk onto the property, which will require the recording of an easement prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Trash staging areas also were pushed farther back onto the property due to the deceleration lane. The building and required egress sidewalks from stairs meet the required 10-foot side (south) setback, both for that portion adjacent to South Gulfview Boulevard and that portion adjacent to Coronado Drive. The proposed building design along South Gulfview Boulevard undulates, with the building at its closest point at a front (west) setback of 5.45 feet. Other portions of the building meet the required 15-foot front setback. Those portions closest to the front property line are the shortest portions of the building, including the pool area at the intersection of South Gulfview Boulevard and 5th Street and townhomes south of the pool. Plans for the City's Beach Walk project will reconfigure South Gulfview Boulevard adjacent to this project shifting the roadway farther west of the subject Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07068 - Page 3 of 11 • • project's property line. A pedestrian promenade of distinctive design is proposed between the new roadway location and this property's west property line, with wide landscaped areas. Therefore, while a portion of the building is proposed at a reduced setback, pedestrians on the promenade will be in excess of 40 feet away from the building. This request includes a reduction to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza and to dumpster staging area). This project is matching and extending a design feature of Beach Walk onto this property near the southern property line on South Gulfview Boulevard, providing a gated resident entry at this location. This decorative architectural pavement should connect with a covered arcade access to this project's lobby and club. With regard to the front setback reduction related to the trash staging area, the building will have refuse collection rooms on the ground floor within the parking garage. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site and is common with many newer developments. The requested flexibility in regard to required setbacks are justified by the benefits to an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area and to the City as a whole for both buildings and landscaping. Except for the area designed for the deceleration lane and public sidewalk on the subject property along Coronado Drive, the proposal includes the provision of a minimum of 15 feet of landscaped area. Landscape areas between the proposed building and property lines will be planted with southern wax privet cabbage palm and Chinese fan palm trees and red firecracker, sea grape, salt meadow cordgrass, schillinas holly, Italian cypress and Indian hawthorn shrubs. On the west side of the building there is a deep indentation of the building that is indicated on the architectural plans as a lushly landscaped courtyard. The landscape plan does not indicate the landscape materials for this courtyard. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan will need to show the plan and materials for this courtyard. The tree removal data on the demolition plan is inconsistent with the tree removal data on the Landscape Plan. Plans are also not clear which trees are to be preserved. These inconsistencies will need to be addressed prior to the issuance of any permits. The building will have refuse collection rooms on the ground floor within the residential portion of the building. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging areas on collection days. The trash staging areas are located near the southern edge of the site on South Gulfview Boulevard and in two locations adjacent to the northern driveway on Coronado Drive. The proposal is to construct a new building of 11-stories at a height of 100 feet to the highest roof deck with an additional 8.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck). The building has been designed with varying heights along Coronado Drive. The parking garage on the southern portion of the site is six-stories in height, but parapets fluctuate giving an appearance of a non-flat building. The height of the residential portion of the building is dependent upon the number of floors at any particular point along the fagade. A pool is proposed on Level 2 at the northwest corner of the building at the intersection of South Gulfview Boulevard and 5t" Street. Three townhomes two-stories in height above the under building parking level are proposed south of the pool facing South Gulfview Boulevard, reducing the scale of the project when viewed from the west. The taller portions of the building are set back, and/or stepped back, behind the townhome units. The proposed building height complies with the Tourist District and Beach by Design. To the southwest of the subject Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07068 - Page 4 of 11 0 0 site on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard the CDB has approved the demolition of the existing Adams Mark hotel for the construction of a 78 room/unit overnight accommodation tower at 100 feet in height and a 112-unit residential tower of 150 feet in height. The 440 West residential development south of the Adams Mark property consists of two residential towers each 157 feet in height. Southeast of the subject site at 445 Hamden Drive the CDB approved the conversion of an existing six-story overnight accommodation use to attached dwellings, including the demolition of the existing southern building for the construction of a new residential building 100 feet in height. The proposal includes an additional 8.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck). The increased parapet height and architectural embellishments are related to their location on a particular portion of the building and are to provide visual interest to the building. The tops of the elevator towers are proposed 16 feet above the roof deck (the maximum permitted by Code). The proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses and in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage and character of adjacent properties. The proposed building is designed with Mediterranean architecture. The building design includes variation in height and scale of the building, significant breaks and steps in the fagade and utilizes overhangs, arcades, balconies, architectural detailing and varying parapets heights to reduce the scale and mass of the building. All three sides of the fagade of the parking garage portion of the building are designed to resemble the residential portion of the building. The east elevation does not articulate the northern motor court and northern ground level entrance to the under building parking area. This oversight will need to be shown on architectural plans prior to the issuance of the building permit. The resident clubhouse and 11 dwellings are planned on the first living floor, with unit sizes ranging from 1,306 to 2,695 square feet in area. Floors 3 - 6 will have 10 dwellings per floor, with units ranging from 1,367 to 2,695 square feet in area. Floors 7 - 10 will have 11 dwellings per floor, with units ranging from 1,367 to 3,375 square feet in area. Floor 11 will have five dwellings, with units ranging from 2,515 to 4,180 square feet in area. The townhome units facing South Gulfview Boulevard are all planned as one-bedroom units. Units on Floors 2 - 5 will have one or two bedrooms, whereas units on Floors 6 - 10 will have one, two or three bedrooms. Units on the top floor will have three or four bedrooms. Dwellings will be accessed from private elevators. Parking for the site today is primarily along Coronado Drive. This proposal provides parking under the residential portion of the building on the north side or in the six-story parking garage on the south side of the site. The proposal will provide a total of 206 parking spaces (2.06 spaces per unit). Vehicular access will be solely from Coronado Drive. The northern driveway provides access to 38 parking spaces under the residential building. The southern driveway provides access to the parking garage with 28 parking, spaces per floor, with the floors of the garage accessed by a concentric opposed plane helical ramp. It is noted that the criteria for attached dwellings prohibit direct access to an arterial street. South Gulfview Boulevard is designated by the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan as an arterial street. Due to the improvements proposed under the City's Beach Walk project and the changed function of South Gulfview Boulevard, the Comprehensive Plan will need to be amended in the future to switch the arterial designation to Coronado Drive, which is where all of the major redevelopment projects, including this proposal, are taking access. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07068 - Page 5 of 11 0 0 There is an existing five-foot wide sidewalk easement on the property that needs to be vacated to provide for the development of the property as proposed. The vacation of this easement needs to occur prior to the issuance of any permits. There are a number of other easements in the name of Florida Power Corp. (Progress Energy) located on the property. Written permission to build in these easements needs to be submitted prior to the issuance of any permits. The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. It is noted that the Code does not provide the ability to request a Comprehensive Sign Program for a residential property. Future signage will need to meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign would need to be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 803.C) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07068 - Page 6 of 11 • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 100 dwelling units (a) X* DENSITY (40 rooms/units per acre; 30 dwelling units per acre) (79 rooms/units or 59 dwellings maximum) IMPERVIOUS 0.77 X SURFACE RATIO ISR 0.95 LOT AREA (5,000 - 1.994 acres; 86,880 square feet X 10,000 s q. feet) LOT WIDTH (50-100 East: 458 feet (Coronado Drive) X feet) West: 359 feet (S. Gulfview Blvd) North: 211 feet (5th Street) FRONT SETBACK East: 15 feet (to building), zero feet (to X* (0-15 feet) pavement) West: 5.45 feet (to building), zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and zero feet (to dumpster staging area) North: 3.63 feet to building) REAR SETBACK West: 15 feet (to building) X* (10-20 feet) SIDE SETBACK South: 15 feet (to building); 10 feet (to X (0-10 feet) sidewalk) HEIGHT (35-100 feet 100 feet (to highest roof deck) with an X* maximum) additional 8.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) PARKING SPACES 206 spaces (2.06 spaces/unit) X (1.5 spaces per unit; 150 space s required) (a) Includes the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for 127 existing overnight accommodation rooms/units, to be converted on a 40/30 ratio to 95 dwelling units. The retail sales parcel provides five dwelling units based on 30 dwelling units per acre, for a total of 100 dwelling units proposed. See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07068 - Page 7 of 11 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.C): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07068 - Page 8 of 11 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 1.994 acres is located within the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of 1.827 acres of the site is for a total of 127-room hotels (which is nonconforming to current density maximums of 73 rooms or 54 dwelling units); 3. The current use of 0.167 acres of the site is for retail sales; 4. The proposal includes the demolition of the existing hotel buildings, the retail sales building and all existing site improvements; 5. The proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity to allow the conversion of the 127 overnight accommodation units/rooms to 95 dwelling units; 6. The proposal is to construct 100 dwelling units (five dwellings are derived from the retail sales portion of the site); 7. The proposed residential and parking garage portions of the building meet the required 15- foot front setback along Coronado Drive and 5th Street; 8. The proposed residential and parking garage portions of the building meet the required 10- foot side setback along the south sides of the property; 9. The reduction to the front setback to the building from 5th Street is only for the one-story pool portion of the building; 10. The impact of the reduction to the front setback to the building along South Gulfview Boulevard is mitigated by the shifting of the roadway for South Gulfview Boulevard farther westward and the construction of a pedestrian promenade with wide landscaped areas under the City's Beach Walk project, and by the location of townhomes of two-stories (over ground level parking) in height adjacent to South Gulfview Boulevard; 11. Setback reductions otherwise are to non-building structures (pavement, sidewalks and trash staging areas). The reduction to pavement along Coronado Drive is due to the requirement to install a deceleration lane; 12. The proposed building height of 100 feet is consistent with the height of existing or approved projects within close proximity to this site (Adams Mark - 100 feet and 150 feet towers; 440 West - 157 feet; 445 Hamden - 100 feet); 13. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development, and will enhance the character of the immediate vicinity; and 14. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density complies with the criteria of Section 6-109; 2. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 4. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 5. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07068 - Page 9 of 11 0 0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 4, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development application to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, for the site at 401, 411 and 421 South Glllfvlew Boulevard with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building), as well as the existing overhead electric for streetlights within Coronado Drive, be placed underground. The Utility Plan shall be revised to indicate compliance with this requirement prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That any future signage meet the requirements of Code and any freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 5. That the Landscape Plan be amended prior to the issuance of any permits to indicate landscape materials and design for the courtyard area off South Gulfview Boulevard; 6. That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07068 -Page 10 of 11 9 0 7. That approval of this request is subject to the vacation by the City of an existing five-foot wide sidewalk easement on the property. Evidence of such vacation of this easement, as well as written permission to build in the Florida Power Corp. (Progress Energy) easements, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That plans indicate the connection of the decorative architectural pavement to the arcade off South Gulfview Boulevard, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That inconsistencies between the tree removal data on the demolition plan and the tree removal data on the Landscape Plan be addressed, as well as clearly indicating trees to be preserved, prior to the issuance of any permits; 10. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the east elevation drawing of the architectural plans be amended to show the northern motor court and northern ground level entrance to the under building parking area; 11. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy an easement be recorded for the public sidewalk located on the subject property along Coronado Drive; 12. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 13. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; and 15. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: . kA& Wayne . Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Wending cases)Up for the next CDBIGu[fview S401-421 Siena Sands (T) - 9.20.05 CDB - WWIGulfview S 401-421 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07068 - Page 11 of 11 r ? Engineering Condition • • Conditions Associated With FLD2005-07068 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD Scott Rice 562-4781 07/21/2005 1. Prior to CDB, applicant shall submit a complete vacation request to Steve Doherty in Public Not Met Works/Engineering (727-562-4773) to vacate 5-foot sidewalk easement recorded in O.R. Book 5255 page 1481 and easement described in Deed Book 508-594. 8/18/05 - NOT SUBMITTED Prior to building permit: 8/18/05 - ACKNOWLEDGED 2. A right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the ROW of Gulfview Blvd. Contact Engineering at (727) 562-4750 in Room 220 at the Municipal Services Building. 3. All other easements on survey are in the name of Florida Power Corp. (Progress Energy) and applicant will need to submit written permission to build in these easements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 07/25/2005 The tree removal data on the Demo Plan is inconsistent with the tree removal data on the Not Met Landscape Plan. Provide consistent data prior to Building Permit. 07/25/2005 Trees to be preserved are hard to distinguish. Provide a more legible plan prior to Building Permit. Not Met Parks & Recs Condition open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if Not Met applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 07/21/2005 Solid waste staging area must connect with street with out curb. please show were recycling carts Not Met will be placeed for resident use. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 07/25/2005 Create continuous right turn lane into both driveways. 8/18/05 - MET Not Met 2. Indicate 20'x 20' sight distance triangles. 8/18/05 - MET 3. H/C parking spaces must be strategically located to the nearest accessible entrance i.e. elevator. 8/18/05 - MET 4. Vertical height clearance of parking garage must be 8'2" to accommodate a h/c van from entrance, route, parking space, and exit. per ADAAG 8/18/05 - ACKNOWLEDGED 5. Ensure that a scaled passenger vehicle (SUV) can enter and exit the helical ramp by showing path. 8/18/05 - NOT PROVIDED 6.What is the height clearance for the helical ramp? 8/8/05 - 8'- 6" PER ARCHITECT. 7. Provide signage and markings for entrance and exit of helical ramp i.e. Do not enter sign, one-way sign, stop sign with stop bar and directional pavement arrows, where appropriate and per current M.U.T.C.D. 8/18/05 - MET 8. Stop bars must be 4' behind the back edge of sidewalk or crosswalk.8/18/05 - MET All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Print Date: 09/14/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 3 ' • • FLD2005-07068 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 07/06/2005 9/14/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition in the Staff Report. 7/12/05 - WW Vacation request needs to be submitted to Engineering now. 7/6/05 - WW Surveys indicate a number of easements on the property, some being FPC easements and others not. How do these easements affect the redevelopment of the site and/or has there been a request to vacate these easements submitted to the Engineering Department? 08/04/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 08/04/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 08/04/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That any storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 08/04/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 08/04/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 08/04/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. 08/04/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 08/04/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 08/04/2005 9/14/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 8/4/05 - WW Sheet A3.01 - East elevation does not indicate the northern motor court and northern ground level parking entrance. Revise. Print Date: 09/14/2005 CaseConditons Page 2 of 3. • FLD2005-07068 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD • CaseConditons Print Date: 09/14/2005 Page 3 of 3 Message • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:17 AM To: 'Jayne E. Sears'; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Siena Sands - 401 S. Gulfview I received some information on 8/18, but still had questions. Have not receive anything since. D. Scots' Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E: Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Subject: Siena Sands - 401 S. Gulfview Did the information you received from Rick Gillette today regarding the helix satisfactorily answer your comments? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 10/3/2005 Message • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Subject: Siena Sands - 401 S. Gulfview Did the information you received from Rick Gillette today regarding the helix satisfactorily answer your comments? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 10/3/2005 0 , ). 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:27 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: jaynes@jpfirm.com Subject: Re: FLD2005-07068 - 401 S. Gulfview I just spoke to Rick Gillette and asked him to response to Scott Rice today. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com> To: <dd@gillettardt.com> Cc: <jaynes@jpfirm.com>; <keith@keithzayac.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 8:33 AM Subject: FW: FLD2005-07068 - 401 S. Gulfview Rick - Please provide a response to Scott Rice (copy me) ASAP. Thanks. Wayne > -----Original Message----- > From: Rice, Scott > Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 4:22 PM > To: Wells, Wayne > Cc: Elbo, Bennett > Subject: FW: FLD2005-07068 - 410 S. Gulfview > Wayne, > A vacation request has been submitted. > Traffic still has questions regarding the operation of the dual helix. > It appears that conflict points exist at each floor for the following > conditions: > 1. vehicles wishing to exit from middle floors are required to traverse > across the upward bound helix lane. What type of traffic control would be > used to minimize conflicts? Stop sign and bar for vehicles entering helix? > 2. Over some distance, vehicles going up and down within the helix will be > at the same elevation. What will be used to separate lanes and avoid one > vehicle sideswiping the other? > 3. If a resident is leaving from an upper floor and changes their mind and > wishes to return to the upper floor, is it possible to change lanes in the > "common" area at each floor? Is there sufficient sight distance for > vehicles to see and react to each other under this condition? > D. Scott Rice > Land Devel. Engr. Manager > 727-562-4781 > scott.rice@MyClearwater.com > -----Original Message----- 1 > From: Rice, Scott > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:22 AM > To: Wells, Wayne > Cc: Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett > Subject: FLD2005-07068 - 410 S. Gulfview > Wayne, > Remaining issues: > Civil Engineering > 1. Prior to CDB, applicant shall submit a complete vacation request to > Steve Doherty in Public Works/Engineering (727-562-4773) to vacate 5-foot > sidewalk easement recorded in O.R. Book 5255 page 1481 and easement > described in Deed Book 508-594. 8/18/05 - NOT SUBMITTED > Traffic > 5. Ensure that a scaled passenger vehicle (SUV) can enter and exit the > helical ramp by showing path. 8/18/05 - NOT PROVIDED > Let me know if you have any questions. > D. Scott Rice > Land Devel. Engr. Manager > 727-562-4781 > scott.rice@MyClearwater.com 2 . _, .. 0 ! Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 4:22 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FW: FLD2005-07068 - 410 S. Gulfview Wayne, A vacation request has been submitted. Traffic still has questions regarding the operation of the dual helix. It appears that conflict points exist at each floor for the following conditions: 1. Vehicles wishing to exit from middle floors are required to traverse across the upward bound helix lane. What type of traffic control would be used to minimize conflicts? Stop sign and bar for vehicles entering helix? 2. Over some distance, vehicles going up and down within the helix will be at the same elevation. What will be used to separate lanes and avoid one vehicle sideswiping the other? 3. If a resident is leaving from an upper floor and changes their mind and wishes to return to the upper floor, is it possible to change lanes in the "common" area at each floor? Is there sufficient sight distance for vehicles to see and react to each other under this condition? D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:22 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005-07068 - 410 S. Gulfview Wayne, Remaining issues: Civil Engineering Prior to CDB, applicant shall submit a complete vacation request to Steve Doherty in Public Works/Engineering (727-562-4773) to vacate 5-foot sidewalk easement recorded in O.R. Book 5255 page 1481 and easement described in Deed Book 508-594. 8/18/05 - NOT SUBMITTED Traffic 5. Ensure that a scaled passenger vehicle (SUV) can enter and exit the helical ramp by showing path. 8/18/05 - NOT PROVIDED Let me know if you have any questions. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com • • Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.comj Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:18 PM To: Jayne E. Sears; Rice, Scott Cc: Ed Armstrong; Joe Burdette (E-mail); Wells, Wayne; mrcole27@aol.com; dd@gillettardt.com Subject: Re: A new fax has arrived from Gillett Associates - FLD2005-07068 Scott, will this information suffice to satisfy your comment. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jayne E. Sears" <JayneS@jpfirm.com> To: <scott.rice@myclearwater.com> Cc: "Ed Armstrong" <EdA@jpfirm.com>; <keith@keithzayac.com>; "Joe Burdette (E-mail)" <Hunraf@aol.com>; <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>; <mrcole27@aol.com>; <dd@gillettardt.com> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:36 PM Subject: FW: A new fax has arrived from Gillett Associates - FLD2005-07068 [My apologies for the repeat emails - this one has Scott Rice's correct email address.] Re: Canterbury (Siena Sands) FLD2005-07068 Attached are drawings received from Rick Gillett concerning the helical ramp, as well as the following information: 1. THERE ARE 2 SEPARATE RAMPS, ONE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE CIRCLE WHICH GOES UP, THE OTHER ON THE INSIDE OF THE CIRCLE WHICH GOES DOWN, THEY NEVER CROSS, SO THERE IS NOT A HEIGHT ISSUE. THE CEILING HEIGHT OF BOTH RAMPS ARE THE SAME AS THE GARAGE FLOOR TO FLOOR HEIGHTS. 2. THIS IS THE SAME TYPE OF RAMP USED AT MOST AIRPORTS. THE ADVANTAGE IS THAT WHEN YOU GO TO 6 FLOORS PEOPLE DONT HAVE THE PATIENCE TO DRIVE DOWN A CONVENTIONAL RAMP TO THE NEXT FLOOR, THEN DRIVE AROUND TO THE BEGINING OF THE RAMP AGAIN AND REPEAT THE PROCESS 6 TIMES. THIS IS AN EXPRESS RAMP WHERE YOU CAN START AT THE TOP AND CONTINUE DOWN WITHOUT EVER LEAVING THE RAMP UNLESS YOU WANTED TO AT ANY DESIRED LEVEL. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 I 0 .0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 4:22 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FW: FLD2005-07068 - 410 S. Gulfview Wayne, A vacation request has been submitted. Traffic still has questions regarding the operation of the dual helix. It appears that conflict points exist at each floor for the following conditions: 1. Vehicles wishing to exit from middle floors are required to traverse across the upward bound helix lane. What type of traffic control would be used to minimize conflicts? Stop sign and bar for vehicles entering helix? 2. Over some distance, vehicles going up and down within the helix will be at the same elevation. What will be used to separate lanes and avoid one vehicle sideswiping the other? 3. If a resident is leaving from an upper floor and changes their mind and wishes to return to the upper floor, is it possible to change lanes in the "common" area at each floor? Is there sufficient sight distance for vehicles to see and react to each other under this condition? D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:22 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005-07068 - 410 S. Gulfview Wayne, Remaining issues: Civil Engineering 1. Prior to CDB, applicant shall submit a complete vacation request to Steve Doherty in Public Works/Engineering (727-562-4773) to vacate 5-foot sidewalk easement recorded in O.R. Book 5255 page 1481 and easement described in Deed Book 508-594. 8/18/05 - NOT SUBMITTED Traffic Ensure that a scaled passenger vehicle (SUV) can enter and exit the helical ramp by showing path. 8/18/05 - NOT PROVIDED Let me know if you have any questions. ,:. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com V. "L 40l 'S GtJ 2 3 5 6 7 v o.0. te1-703 8 dI \ 9 0.¢ 1b1-4.T 10 ? J a 12 13 ; v 14 t 18 _ 19 •aJ 20 ? 26 A ?? sour lot y . 0 32/02 32/03 „ /ab ? NE T •a 2 S STREET a •? 3 9 N o so W ; 4 1 ar 52 98 C te° 5 6 53 99 m +ra 7 Sr tDO .0.7 ZCY ! } ? en V $ 6 p ty 4114 w 6 102 3 49 ? S $ 103. ++4 $ 53 52 no 5 104 1 Ise 51 5 cog2 70 0 49 0 STREET a . E 105 aW I t we tlI DO Is t06 404 4p4 2 1 eo a 1 ?! > g ao4 3 N s to I 08 81, 1 9 aft w O air 2 1 0 a217 ay 5 0 2A 21 15. 96 aq 67 tt t0 57 4p 22 65 it 8 23 0 s4a 69 118 5411 4I? 7 a 24 71g?4 441 70 b 4 8 1 25 rt aaa 71 120 I ?s1 O 9 H4 2 6 A3 ( FIFI{, a4t s4a t0 9A 26:5 Q lea STRE ET 1 A 0 A. 9 27 73 122 t 124 I 04 A A. 17a_apt 26 a 74 2 ? It 29 .y 75 724 310 4e 4a t t 78 725 r 4 i 30 ad 9 A na 77 126 5 6 -to 4q 31 127 79 2 A( 32 sat 126, A 79 410 6 4i 3 10 S$T t rit 80 2 4,d 7 4 ?. 33 400 A 81 0 5 34 82 131 1 2 6 35 3 sib 63 440 WEST ,o CONDO ?- 22-27 WATER LOT A P CITY 9eMfp P DRIVE !'S I8 17 BAY90E 15 1-1246C 11/10/A P e% 6 9 - W* o /a1 rP/f 7- 1/" "V CITY OF CLEARWATER AND VICINITY P=UAS COUNTY, PLOSID1 PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ?s-? ENOWE6PING ?7-nr G11 n? 100 S 4K0• Ave., Clrar.aler, fl 33756 Ph-- (I13)%2-4730. yaa: (fit3)R6-4755 hltp://wr.cleorrat.-flcam .529 1, Dlsebimen PubIlc hlamOllon dole Is furoisned by the Clty 01 Cleareota Pubk Ways Admhl$,(atba/Enghe.4 and mull be oeaeptea and used by the rectolenl alth the underetandhq that the dalo received rye cdNcted for the pwpose of dwdoping a graphic Intrastruetare hvmlay. Aa WM, tM CRy of Cle,-", PWA/E maker no smrronl4s, eApreesed a MWd, concerNnyy the 04C y compteleness, reiloblpty a WllabOBy, of thte data for any oI . pmrtkWor see. iwlhrmare, the City of Ctwr«•ter PWA/E a-- no 11ubinily rholeoever associated elth the uss a mlarse of arch data. This Alias page Is Wbtl? to periodic Mang... FW Nfamollon about latest -Won. please call PWA/E or vldl ow Wee slle. N 0 100 200 400 600 SCALE: 1- - 400' LEGEND: O BLOCK NUMBER 12$4 LOT ADDRESS -?--- CITY LIMITS LINE SHADED AREA - PROPERTY W OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION ZONE LINE F REVISED: 03/08/99 ZONING ATLAS 8?/ 29 S- 150E 2 7 6 A Wells, Wayne . From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 3:59 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD:2005-07068 L-J zone.doc location.doc FLD Map request existing.doc aerial.doc form.doc Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 12:36 PM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 401, 411 and 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-07068 for the property at 401, 411 and 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne FLD Map request form.doc 0 0 Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2005-07068 Date Requested: August 20, 2005 Date Requested for (date): September 2, 2005 Maps Requested x? Location Map x? Aerial Map x? Zoning Map x? Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineerin g x? Legal Description x? Survey x? Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name I Canterbury Property Management, Inc.; TLS Owners: Holdings, Inc.; Canterbury Oaks, Inc; Case: FLD2005-07068 I Dorothy Boldo ,Trustee for M & J Trust i Site: 401, 411 and 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. I Property Size(Acres): 1.994 07/29/15/52380/000/1280 07/29/15/52380/000/1270 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0760 07/29/15/52380/000/0740 07/29/15/52380/000/0720 Atlas Page: 276A ®. 01 ?I c rs A a N 0 O vJ 4 0 U O F- Z Z 0 a 401 IS C?,Akyxi„ F M ? ? Z --o'7M - - 1 ° 0 32/02 32/0] I 3 g r1R e. 8T roc 9 ail y STRUT $ ea 3 a 0o aa° V : to 5 Jill 6 1 52 98 t O Pa 5 8 7 53 99 m mt 7 as o.a 161 Sa too uy 0 211 N `? Ly 9 .2es a as -.4 V 4J ? J ut 5 102 1L w p 4 t \ 9 ? a 11 3 as 103 i JS e„ 1 52 ( j 0e. Iao1-wT 10 \ . 53 u it to 5 ? J a 1104 1 C"4180 sl S0 ? ` 12 B 0 To 41 al a.J STAEET e . N \J a .,.. 7W8 105 top , 1 4 Sol; ur 113 t 66-10 106 1De ail. 2 1 p ail dg 1 y ! 1a 11 88 aoa31 O a0 IA mt 01 OB aN a/ I t at, 418 118 m mr 92 1 0 Job a-a 1 V72 5 O 1 = 53 1 all to 2A 18 ate 6EV 64 I 3 tta 19 cat us %7 as 3A 65 - a 20 114 aft `r 8B ' 4A p/UJabPPtp 1. at 15 aaa 9 . 21 57 10 6 5 au 67 It 22 aa R 54 53 sz 88 N w lt g 23 0 dta 69 118 24 '4 yaa N? 7 b to I eRIONT NAl1 r J4Q ?$ 1 70 119 car 9 1 as ?.4 2 $ Pi 25 ace 71 120 i11 O dca a 5 ° 7 26 F1R71f t0aec 9A 26% 4 1MUT 10A 8 9 27 73 122 .11. 1301- -fW ey 1 12 vo IA 2 V. 28 0 74 11 29 J 75 Us 3 1110 aw 1 t 2 3 aril 76 125 30 a s V y r? 9 A $ i a 5 alt 77 126 s a s & ?'? 311 78 127 32 ati t28a 8 ,a{ 2 du ° 3 tJ 3 Iq 1 $ J51178D 29 ey7 iiiTTT a = 2 a 5 ° 7 33 gig ap Bt 9 5 34 82 131 1 2 ' 3 35 ssb 83 rw ? 440 WEST CONDO \ 22-27 I WATER LOT A P 0111y 0111110 P 2678 ? y CITY OF CLEARWATER o' s s`` e Q a PIN21LA9 COUNCIN TY FLORIDA pP[PARED By pp? PUBLIC 1TORKS ADMINISTRATION g ENGINEERING "!,? VV 100 S Myrtle Mt.. C4-1.1, It 33755 (e13)s6Z-47 0. rat: (e35Z6-755 nlto: //ow.ckarvalm- I1.com/englnem/ OlscWltnen public Intotmotlon dolo is Wrnlmed by tile City of Cteurwolef Public Works Admh4lrolicn/Engineering, and mull De occepl.4 and used by the rcclplenl rl{h Ue underslondFg trial the Bolo reeNvad vas ,11*,Ied for the purpaee of developing a graphic MlroslruNure Nvmlery. Aa such, lM CAy of Ctearwaler PWA/E nickel no waranl4e, eAPrassed a Imps.". conarNnq the accuracy. eom ictin"s, tellobtaty, m aullob4lly of this dalo for any other palkuler use. iurlhmmore. the City of Cleoraoler PWA/E ossumes n. Ilob411y whaHaMf ossocloltd with In* use of m11suae of such dol.. 29 um. / This ADoe page Is subild to pmladk changes. rot Mfw ernpon obbtl WWII revisions please 10 PWA/E or SO v1si1 our Web .11e. N 0 100 zoo ago bop SCALE: 1" . 400' UTBLE o-7 ae 33 1111 fz it 32 1111143 $ pp gr Y E 8 .31 30 7 113 to IS +6 olI 20 211 t? 4 'Y 111129 z3 24 258 $ \ P 78 27 28 10 U ?tNl2 17 +a 1 ` A la l9 ?0? 41 z2 eAY90E 'A/ 0 ?1 f2 13 14 ?14 I 15 32 e tz 11 '? d E 10 A S e d ,o8?k ?g0 p c •4 ? 3 E 4 B F P 00?? LEGEND: O BLOCK NUMBER IZ34 LOT ADDRESS CITY LIMITS LINE SHADED AREA - PROPERTY OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION • ZONE LINE REMEO. 03/08/99 ZONING ATLAS A I 1/4 OF 29 S SEC 50E 1276A Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 11:39 AM' To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: 'amber@keithzayac.com' Subject: FW: FLD2005-07068 - 410 S. Gulfview Keith - All departments are reviewing the resubmittal information for cases wanting to go to the 9/20/05 CDB meeting. This email came from Scott Rice that I thought you should get ASAP to be able to respond. I and other departments are still reviewing. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:22 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005-07068 - 410 S. Gulfview Wayne, Remaining issues: Civil Engineering 1. Prior to CDB, applicant shall submit a complete vacation request to Steve Doherty in Public Works/Engineering (727-562-4773) to vacate 5-foot sidewalk easement recorded in O.R. Book 5255 page 1481 and easement described in Deed Book 508-594. 8/18/05 - NOT SUBMITTED Traffic 5. Ensure that a scaled passenger vehicle (SUV) can enter and exit the helical ramp by showing path. 8/18/05 - NOT PROVIDED Let me know if you have any questions. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 12:37 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Cc: DRC Members Subject: RE: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB Revised and updated PP as needed. 655 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 1770 Drew- Conditions met. 401 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 342 Hamden- No Issues. 691 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 706 Bayway- No Issues. 475 East Shore- Condition met. 1460 Missouri- No Issues. 1200 Betty Ln- No Issues. 566 Bay Esplanade- Conditions met. 229 Coronado- Condition to be met at building permit. 621 Bay Esplanade- No Issues. 600 Pennsylvania- ?????? 1242 Cleveland- Revised condition to be met at building permit. -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:48 AM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB The following cases have been resubmitted from prior DRC meetings. Prior to being scheduled for the 9/20/05 CDB meeting agenda, please come by our office and review the following cases based on your comments on Permit Plan. If the revisions are acceptable, meaning that from your standpoint it may be scheduled for the CDB, or if there are still outstanding comments that would prevent it from being scheduled for CDB, please let the case planner know. Please review the following cases by end of the day tomorrow, August 17,.2005. Thanks. 655 S Gulfview Blvd FLD2005-07072 1770 Drew Street - FLD2005-06054 401 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-07068 342 Hamden Drive - FLD2005-07066 691 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-06057 706 Bayway Blvd - FLD2005-07070 475 East Shore Drive - FLD2005-06056 1460 S Missouri Avenue - FLD2005-08039 1200 N Betty Lane - FLD2005-07063 566 Bay Esplanade Avenue - FLD2005-07065 229 Coronado Drive - FLD2005-07061 621 Bay Esplanade - FLD2005-07064 600 Pennsylvania Avenue - FLD2005-06055 1242 Cleveland Street - FLD20CO058 • Wells, Wayne NNNN? From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:48 AM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB The following cases have been resubmitted from prior DRC meetings. Prior to being scheduled for the 9/20/05 CDB meeting agenda, please come by our office and review the following cases based on your comments on Permit Plan. If the revisions are acceptable, meaning that from your standpoint it may be scheduled for the CDB, or if there are still outstanding comments that would prevent it from being scheduled for CDB, please let the case planner know. Please review the following cases by end of the day tomorrow, August 17, 2005. Thanks. 655 S Gulfview Blvd FLD2005-07072 1770 Drew Street - FLD2005-06054 J401 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-07068 342 Hamden Drive - FLD2005-07066 691 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-06057 706 Bayway Blvd - FLD2005-07070 475 East Shore Drive - FLD2005-06056 . 1460 S Missouri Avenue - FLD2005-08039 1200 N Betty Lane - FLD2005-07063 566 Bay Esplanade Avenue - FLD2005-07065 229 Coronado Drive : FLD2005-07061 621 Bay Esplanade - FLD2005-07064 600 Pennsylvania Avenue - FLD2005-06055 1242 Cleveland Street - FLD2005-06058 3:00 pm Case Number: FLD2005-070 8 -- 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD 0 Owner(s): Canterbury Oaks Inc 401 S Gulfview Blvd All, Or Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email b4c Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire (74"W" Po Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-441-8617, E-MAIL: ed@jpfirm.com Location: 1.994 acres located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive at the intersection with Fifth Street. Atlas Page: UNK Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner 111 Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard, Rick Albee Applicant/Rep: Ed Armstrong, Jayne Sears, Keith Zayac, Rick Gillett, Joe Burdette, Martin Cole Other: Aaron Sharockman The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Prior to CDB, applicant shall submit a complete vacation request to Steve Doherty in Public Works/Engineering (727-562-4773) to vacate 5-foot sidewalk easement recorded in O.R. Book 5255 page 1481 and easement described in Deed Book 508-594. Prior to building permit: 2. A right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the ROW of Gulfview Blvd. Contact Engineering at (727) 562-4750 in Room 220 at the Municipal Services Building. 3. All other easements on survey are in the name of Florida Power Corp. (Progress Energy) and applicant will need to submit written permission to build in these easements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Environmental: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 52 1 . Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault: 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance, schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Fire: I , ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2. This property must be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting all the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Provide plans showing the complete fire underground including hydrants, FDCs, fire sprinkler line, backflow preventors PRIOR TO CDB. 4. This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by both the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Building Code and Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 7 . All required hydrants shall be in addition to any internal sprinkler or standpipe system serving the building and shall not be located on the fire line water main service.Provide and show on the plan hydrants on the same side of the street and within 300 feet of the most remote point of the building, as the hose is laid, PRIOR TO CDB. g . Provide automatic wet standpipe with fire pump providing 100 psi at roof. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 9. Fire pump must be located above BFE. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 10. Fire command room must be located above BFE. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: No issues. Legal: No issues. Land Resources: 1 . The tree removal data on the Demo Plan is inconsistent with the tree removal data on the Landscape Plan. Provide consistent data prior to Building Permit. 2 . Trees to be preserved are hard to distinguish. Provide a more legible plan prior to Building Permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 53 1 . Sheet 5/5 - There 0 is a shading adjacent to property lines that is not inicated what the landscape material is. It may appear to be sod, but is not indicated. Revise. 2. Sheet 5/5 - Ensure that proposed landscaping meets the Fire Department requirements for non-interferance with the FHA and the FDC. Coordinate landscaping around these utility devices to have proper clearance. Same is needed for the water meter and backflow preventor to avoid landscaping being trampled. Revise. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 , 1. Discharge to a City of Clearwater stormwater system requires attenuation and design for the 25-year storm event. 2. Provide vault storage calculations. 3. Provide vault recovery analysis. 4. What is the method of treatment? All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Solid Waste: 1 . Solid waste staging area must connect with street with out curb. please show were recycling carts will be placeed for resident use. Traffic Engineering: 1 . Create continuous right turn lane into both driveways. 2. Indicate 20'x 20' sight distance triangles. 3. H/C parking spaces must be strategically located to the nearest accessible entrance i.e. elevator. Planning: 4. Vertical height clearance of parking garage must be 8' 2" to accommodate a h/c van from entrance, route, parking space, and exit. per ADAAG 5. Ensure that a scaled passenger vehicle (SUV) can enter and exit the helical ramp by showing path. 6.What is the height clearance for the helical ramp? 8/8/05 - 8'- 6" PER ARCHITECT. 7. Provide signage and markings for entrance and exit of helical ramp i.e. Do not enter sign, one-way sign, stop sign with stop bar and directional pavement arrows, where appropriate and per current M.U.T.C.D.. 8. Stop bars must be 4' behind the back edge of sidewalk or crosswalk. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 54 • 1 . 7/12/05 - WW • Vacation request needs to be submitted to Engineering now. 7/6/05 - WW Surveys indicate a number of easements on the property, some being FPC easements and others not. How do these easements affect the redevelopment of the site and/or has there been a request to vacate these easements submitted to the Engineering Department? 2. Floor plans submitted bare little resemblance to the elevations submitted, as the floor plans do not show many of the windows and doors indicated on the elevations. Revise to indicate the proposed windows and doors. Also show any balconies proposed. Provide the dimensions for balconies, especially the distance of the protrusion from the building face (sometimes into the required setback). 3 . 7/12/05 - WW This has been redrawn as a dashed line on the civil and landscape plans and labeled as an "arcade." Unclear what an arcade is. If an overhang, unclear what the overhang is for. Advise/revise. 7/6/05 - WW On Sheet 3/5, 4/5, 5/5 and A2.01 there is a line shown outside of the building line of the parking garage parallel with Coronado Drive that is dimensioned at 18.32 feet from Coronado Drive. On all sheets, it is unclear what this line is depicting, since it doesn't look like any building area, nor a sidewalk. Revise/make clear. 4. Provide dimensions of the building on the site plan and building plans. 5 . Floor plans and building elevations lack detail to correlate the undulation of the facade. Building elevations are "fuzzy" or "sketchy," lacking the clarity usually provided with such submissions. There appears to be three buildings (Units J,K & L appear to be one building together with the parking garage, separate from the northern, taller building, separate from the townhouse building with Units M, N & O), yet I see no break in the building (north to south). The townhouses (with their roofs) are not clearly depicted on the west elevation. Revise/clarify. 6. Place a note on Sheet 3/5 that the air conditioning equipment is on the roof and/or provide a rooftop plan showing the a/c units. 7 . Revise Exhibit B, Description of Request, under "a" - There are only 54 residential units permitted today under current rules (not 55). Revise. 8 . Revise the request to that indicated by Staff above. 9. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 10. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 11 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 12 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 13 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. 15 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 55 17 . Sheets 3/5, 4/5, 5/5 and A2.01 - There is a pedestrian plaza with "decorative architectural pavers" indicated between the South Gulfview Blvd. right--of-way line and the building, including a "V" indentation toward Coronado Drive. It is my understanding that on the east end of this "V," even though it isn't shown on the drawings, that there is an entrance into the building lobby. Since this is a residential building and there is no commercial uses trying to draw people into the property, this "decorative architectural pavers" appears excessive. This should be cut back considerably and rather provided with large areas of landscaping for the benefit of the condo owners, potentially into a garden courtyard. Revise all appropriate sheets. 18 . Revise Sheet 3/5 in the Site Data Table for the "required" "multi-family units" from 60 units to 59 units. 19 . Revise the written scale of Sheet 3/5 from 1 inch = 60 feet to 1 inch = 30 feet. 20 . Since a large portion of the building is located within the VE Flood Zone, use of certain areas on the ground floor may be restricted as to use or construction, such as storage. Check with Development Services regarding restrictions within the VE Flood Zone. 21 . Sheet A3.03 - The parking garage portion is not shown on the west elevation. Revise. 22 . Sheet A3.01 - Indicate on the drawing the dividing line between the east and south elevations. 23 . Sheet A3.01 - Based on the east elevation, the east side of the parking garage undulates with bases with columns above, columns, etc. This, however, is not translated onto Sheets A2.01, A2.02 and Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5. The civil plans indicate an "arcade" (see prior comment). Show this undulating facade of the garage on these sheets, including setbacks to the front property line of S. Gulfview Blvd. 24 . Gates are indicated on Sheet A3.01 at the driveway entrances into the ground level parking that are not indicated on Sheet 3/5. Revise Sheet 3/5. 25 . Revised Sheet A2.03 (Level 6) indicates "club below" north of the helical ramp, yet Revised Sheet A2.02 (Levels 2-5) does not indicate any such club. If there is a "club," describe its characteristics as part of the narrative. 26 . Revised Elevations (Sheets A3.01, A3.02 and A3.03) indicate the height of the building to the flat roof deck. Parapets are indicated to only be 2.5 feet above the roof deck, which is not correct. Indicate through dimensioning the heights of all perimeter parapets, as any parapet greater than 2.5 feet needs to be part of the request. Also, these elevations indicate other features that extend above the roof deck that are dimensioned to be the Code maximum of 16 feet. However, there are features that extend to approximately 21 feet above the roof deck. Dimension all of these features, also indicating what the feature is (elevator, stairs, trash chute, mechanical rooms, etc.), as anything above 16 feet needs to be part of the request. 27 . Revised West Elevation (Sheet A3.03) indicates stairs at the townhomes and from the pool area to S. Gulfview Blvd. These stairs need to be indicated on the floor plans (Sheets A2.01 and A2.02) and on the civil plans (Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5). May need to be included in the request as setback reductions. 28 . Sheet A3.01 - East elevation does not indicate the northern motor court and northern ground level parking entrance. Revise. 29 . Sheet A3.01 (East Elevation) - Fencing with columns are indicated on the elevation, but is not indicated on Sheet A2.01, nor any of the civil plans (Sheet 3/5, 4/5 or 5/5). Potentially some of the fencing/columns, if located in the front setback area, will need to be advertised as to setback reductions and/or fence height increases. Need to also indicate on Sheet A3.01 and all other appropriate sheets the heights of the fencing and columns. 30 . Sheet A3.01, A3.02 and A3.03 indicates in the Building Materials Legend "M-8" for a decorative canvas awning with aluminum frame. I do not find such on the elevations. 31 . To assist the Planning staff to interprete, understand and coordinate the undulation of the building on the building elevations, could the architectural plans include a lettering system (A to Z) on the floor plans and the elevations that are to points of deviation in the building facade? 32 . General Applicability criteria #1 - Provide detailed information as to HOW the proposed project is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. It is acceptable to talk about changes to the subject site, but the response needs to address the adjacent properties. 33 . General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide detailed information as to HOW the proposed project is consistent with the character of properties in the immediate vicinity. Provide specific information, not general information. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 56 34. Comprehensive I*Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Lots of information has been provided about the proposal, but little has been provided as to HOW the proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards." Provide the justification for the reductions, increases and other deviations requested. 35 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Provide justification as to HOW the proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses (specific examples). 36 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 - Provide information as to HOW this proposal creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the subject property and to Clearwater generally (provide specific information). 37 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - Regarding "setbacks," it is unclear what of "Beach Walk" is being incorporated into the project, especially from a visual aspect relating to reduced setbacks. Much of the information provided is nice, but doesn't speak as to HOW the flexibility regarding setbacks and height are "justified by the benefits to community character" of the immediate vicinity and Clearwater generally. Provide specific information justifying both the setback reductions AND the height increase. 38 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #10 - Paragraph on Page 7 regarding height of the building, parapets and elevator/mechanical equipment needs to ensure that the parapet, elevator/mechanical equipment and "architectural embellishments" heights discussed in this paragraph are consistent with what will be requested (see prior comment regarding such improvements above the roof deck that must be part of the request). It is mentioned about a "club." Provide what is meant by a "club" in relation to this residential project. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 9/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 8/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 57 Case Number: FLD2005-07068 -- 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD 00 pm \ Owner(s): Canterbury Oaks Inc 401 S Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, Fl 33767 • O TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 "Ww- is TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-441-8617, E-MAIL: ed@jpfirm.com Location: 1.994 acres located between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive at the intersection with Fifth Street. Atlas Page: UNK Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Blackburn Applicant/Rep: Ed Armstrong, Jayne Sears, Keith Zayac, Rick Gillett The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , Prior to building permit: 1. A right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the ROW of Gulfview Blvd. Contact Engineering at (727) 562-4750 in Room 220 at the Municipal Services Building. 2. Prior to CDB applicant shall submit a complete vacation request to Steve Doherty in Public Works/Engineering (727-562-4773) to vacate 54oot sidewalk easement recorded in O.R. Book 5255 page 1481• and easement described in Deed Book 508-594. 3. All other easements on survey are in the name of Florida Power Corp. (Progress Energy) and applicant will need to submit written permission to build in these easements prior to issuance of a building permit. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Environmental: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 54 I . Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if, specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Fire: I . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2 , This property must be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting all the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Provide plans showing the complete fire underground including hydrants, FDCs, fire sprinkler line, backflow preventors PRIOR TO CDB. 4 . This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by both the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Building Code and Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 7. All required hydrants shall be in addition to any internal sprinkler or standpipe system serving the building and shall not be located on the fire line water main service.Provide and show on the plan hydrants on the same side of the street and within 300 feet of the most remote point of the building, as the hose is laid, PRIOR TO CDB. 8 . Provide automatic wet standpipe with fire pump providing 100 psi at roof. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 9. Fire pump must be located above BFE. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 10. Fire command room must be located above BFE. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: . 1 No issues. Land Resources: I . The tree removal data on the Demo Plan is inconstant with the tree removal data on the Landscape Plan. Provide constant data prior to Building Permit. 2. Trees to be preserved are hard to distinguish. Provide a more legible plan prior to Building Permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 -.Page 55 0 1 . Sheet 5/5 - There is a shading adjacent to property lines that is not 41nicated what the landscape material is. It may appear to be sod, but is not indicated. Revise. 2. Sheet 5/5 - Ensure that proposed landscaping meets the Fire Department requirements for non-interferance with the FHA and the FDC. Coordinate landscaping around these utility devices to have proper clearance. Same is needed for the water meter and backflow preventor to avoid landscaping being trampled. Revise. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . 1. Discharge to a City of Clearwater stormwater system requires attenuation and design for the 25-year storm event. 2. Provide vault storage calculations. 3. Provide vault recovery analysis. 4. What is the method of treatment? All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Solid Waste: 1 . Solid waste staging area must connect with street with out curb. please show were recycling carts will be placeed for resident use. Traffic Engineering: 1 . Create continuous right turn lane into both driveways. 2. Indicate 20'x 20' sight distance triangles. 3. H/C parking spaces must be strategically located to the nearest accessible entrance i.e. Planning: elevator. 4. Vertical height clearance of parking garage must be 8' 2" to accommodate a h/c van from entrance, route, parking space, and exit. per ADAAG 5. Ensure that a scaled passenger vehicle (SUV) can enter and exit the helical ramp by showing path. 6.What is the height clearance for the helical ramp? 7. Provide signage and markings for entrance and exit of helical ramp i.e. Do not enter sign, one-way sign, stop sign with stop bar and directional pavement arrows, where appropriate and per current M.U.T.C.D.. 8. Stop bars must be 4' behind the back edge of sidewalk or crosswalk. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 56 1 . 7/12/05 - WW • • Vacation request needs to be submitted to Engineering now. 7/6/05 - WW Surveys indicate a number of easements on the property, some being FPC easements and others not. How do these easements affect the redevelopment of the site and/or has there been a request to vacate these easements submitted to the Engineering Department? 2. Floor plans submitted bare little resemblance to the elevations submitted, as the floor plans do not show many of the windows and doors indicated on the elevations. Revise to indicate the proposed windows and doors. Also show any balconies proposed. Provide the dimensions for balconies, especially the distance of the protrusion from the building face (sometimes into the required setback). 3 . 7/12/05 - WW This has been redrawn as a dashed line on the civil and landscape plans and labeled as an "arcade." Unclear what an arcade is. If an overhang, unclear what the overhang is for. Advise/revise. 7/6/05 - WW On Sheet 3/5, 4/5, 5/5 and A2.01 there is a line shown outside of the building line of the parking garage parallel with Coronado Drive that is dimensioned at 18.32 feet from Coronado Drive. On all sheets, it is unclear what this line is depicting, since it doesn't look like any building area, nor a sidewalk. Revise/make clear. 4. Provide dimensions of the building on the site plan and building plans. 5 . Floor plans and building elevations lack detail to correlate the undulation of the facade. Building elevations are "fuzzy" or "sketchy," lacking the clarity usually provided with such submissions. There appears to be three buildings (Units J,K & L appear to be one building together with the parking garage, separate from the northern, taller building, separate from the townhouse building with Units M, N & O), yet I see no break in the building (north to south). The townhouses (with their roofs) are not clearly depicted on the west elevation. Revise/clarify. 6. Place a note on Sheet 3/5 that the air conditioning equipment is on the roof and/or provide a rooftop plan showing the a/c units. 7 . Revise Exhibit B, Description of Request, under "a" - There are only 54 residential units permitted today under current rules (not 55). Revise. 8 . Revise the request to that indicated by Staff above. 9. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 10. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 11 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 12 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 13 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. 15 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 57 17 . Sheets 3/5, 4/5, 5/ and A2.01 - There is a pedestrian plaza with "decorative architectural pavers" indicated between the South Gulfview Blvd. right--of-way line and the building, including a "V" indentation toward Coronado Drive. It is my understanding that on the east end of this "V," even though it isn't shown on the drawings, that there is an entrance into the building lobby. Since this is a residential building and there is no commercial uses trying to draw people into the property, this "decorative architectural pavers" appears excessive. This should be cut back considerably and rather provided with large areas of landscaping for the benefit of the condo owners, potentially into a garden courtyard. Revise all appropriate sheets. 18 . Revise Sheet 3/5 in the Site Data Table for the "required" "multi-family units" from 60 units to. 59 units. 19 . Revise the written scale of Sheet 3/5 from 1 inch = 60 feet to 1 inch = 30 feet. 20 . Since a large portion of the building is located within the VE Flood Zone, use of certain areas on the ground floor may be restricted as to use or construction, such as storage. Check with Development Services regarding restrictions within the VE Flood Zone. 21 . Sheet A3.03 - The parking garage portion is not shown on the west elevation. Revise. 22. Sheet A3.01 - Indicate on the drawing the dividing line between the east and south elevations. 23 . Sheet A3.01 - Based on the east elevation, the east side of the parking garage undulates with bases with columns above, columns, etc. This, however, is not translated onto Sheets A2.01, A2.02 and Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5. The civil plans indicate an "arcade" (see prior comment). Show this undulating facade of the garage on these sheets, including setbacks to the front property line of S. Gulfview Blvd. 24. Gates are indicated on Sheet A3.01 at the driveway entrances into the ground level parking that are not indicated on Sheet 3/5. Revise Sheet 3/5. 25 . Revised Sheet A2.03 (Level 6) indicates "club below" north of the helical ramp, yet Revised Sheet A2.02 (Levels 2-5) does not indicate any such club. If there is a "club," describe its characteristics as .part of the narrative. 26 . Revised Elevations (Sheets A3.01, A3.02 and A3.03) indicate the height of the building to the flat roof deck. Parapets are indicated to only be 2.5 feet above the roof deck, which is not correct. Indicate through dimensioning the heights of all perimeter parapets, as any parapet greater than 2.5 feet needs to be part of the request. Also, these elevations indicate other features that extend above the roof deck that are dimensioned to be the Code maximum of 16 feet. However, there are features that extend to approximately 21 feet above the roof deck. Dimension all of these features, also indicating what the feature is (elevator, stairs, trash chute, mechanical rooms, etc.), as anything above 16 feet needs to be part of the request. 27 . Revised West Elevation (Sheet A3.03) indicates stairs at the townhomes and from the pool area to S. Gulfview Blvd. These stairs need to be indicated on the floor plans (Sheets A2.01 and A2.02) and on the civil plans (Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5). May need to be included in the request as setback reductions. 28 . Sheet A3.01 - East elevation does not indicate the northern motor court and northern ground level parking entrance. Revise. 29. Sheet A3.01 (East Elevation) - Fencing with columns are indicated on the elevation, but is not indicated on Sheet A2.01, nor any of the civil plans (Sheet 3/5, 4/5 or 5/5). Potentially some of the fencing/columns, if located in the front setback area, will need to be advertised as to setback reductions and/or fence height increases. Need to also indicate on Sheet A3.01 and all other appropriate sheets the heights of the fencing and columns. 30 . Sheet A3.01, A3.02 and A3.03 indicates in the Building Materials Legend "M-8" for a decorative canvas awning with aluminum frame. I do not find such on the elevations. 31 . To assist the Planning staff to interprete, understand and coordinate the undulation of the building on the building elevations, could the architectural plans include a lettering system (A to Z) on the floor plans and the elevations that are to points of deviation in the building facade? 32 . General Applicability criteria #1 - Provide detailed information as to HOW the proposed project is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. It is acceptable to talk about changes to the subject site, but the response needs to address the adjacent properties. 33 . General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide detailed information as to HOW the proposed project is consistent with the character of properties in the immediate vicinity. Provide specific information, not general information. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 58 ? 34 . ation has been provided Comprehensive Inti Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Lots of int about the proposal, but little has been provided as to HOW the proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards." Provide the justification for the reductions, increases and other deviations requested. 35 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Provide justification as to HOW the proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses (specific examples). 36. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 - Provide information as to HOW this proposal creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the subject property and to Clearwater generally (provide specific information). 37 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - Regarding "setbacks," it is unclear what of "Beach Walk" is being incorporated into the project, especially from a visual aspect relating to reduced setbacks. Much of the information provided is nice, but doesn't speak as to HOW the flexibility regarding setbacks and height are "justified by the benefits to community character" of the immediate vicinity and Clearwater generally. Provide specific information justifying both the setback reductions AND the height increase. 38 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #10 - Paragraph on Page 7 regarding height of the building, parapets and elevator/mechanical equipment needs to ensure that the parapet, elevator/mechanical equipment and "architectural embellishments" heights discussed in this paragraph are consistent with what will be requested (see prior comment regarding such improvements above the roof deck that must be part of the request). It is mentioned about a "club." Provide what is meant by a "club" in relation to this residential project. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 9/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 8/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 59 0 0 Community Response Team \ Planning Dept. Cases - DRC V" Case No. N) 01,,5- ( D(O Meeting Date: ??? ?L)J Location: 1401 ? budfo-ow byd ? Current Use: ? Active Code Enforcement Case & yes: ? Address number (Ze ?) (no) (vacant land) ? Landscaping yes (no) ? Overgrown (yes) Q ? Debris (yes) no) ? Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) ao J ? Building(s) (good) air) (poor) (vacant land) ? Fencing (none) oo) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ? Paint (good) fair (poor) (garish) ? Grass Parking (yes) (M ? Residential Parking Violations (yes) fe? ? Signage (none) ok (not ok) (billboard) ? Parking (n/a) tri a (handicapped) (needs repaving) ? Dumpster (enclosed) of enclos_ ) ? Outdoor storage (yes) no Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date:7t?-,. OS Reviewed by:??Q, Telephone: Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 gF/ 3,-l ti ? 1y? "T E CASE SUMMARY OCL9016941 421 S GULFVIEW BLVD RED ROOF INN Bus phone: (727) 447-3464 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner ES 0 i CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 CANTERBURY PROPERTY MGMT INC PHONE: (727) 447-3464 AEGEAN ASSOCIATES LTD FAX: No Fax 421 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL $1,527.20 $1,527.20 $0.00 NOVEMBER DELINQUENT 5 $17.95 $17.95 $0.00 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 $35.89 $35.89 $0.00 Total $1,581.04 $1,581.04 $0.00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity # Employees 0170020 MERCHANT OR MERCHANDISING 1,999 0 ^g1'000 RENTAL UNITS 73 0 110020 VENDING MACHINES: OPERATOR 3 0 Done ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp By !sue License - RENEWAL 11/26/2001 DONE BLS 01-02 'L Letter Sent 10/16/2001 DONE WBS . $66.00 balance due by 10/31/01 to avoid 15% late fee, also business name changed from Aege an Sands Resort Motel to Red Rood Inn per change on renewal notice, verified with state, ds OCL Letter Sent 11/14/2001 DONE WBS $96.66 balance due by 11/30/01 to avoid additional late fees, Second Notice sent, ds Issue License - RENEWAL 11/5/1999 DONE Janet McMahan Issue License 10/7/1997 DONE TAW Issue License - RENEWAL 11/2/1998 DONE BLS ,Issue License - RENEWAL 10/18/2000 DONE GBD r:\Forms\I nfoSu mma ry. rpt I ?SJ?? 0CUUM 6941 421 S GULFVIEW BLVD ,k. . Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH ' ??tiriewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Parcel Hold Override 11/26/2001 BLS Condition Code: DEVO Value: Description:Dev Order Hold Parcel Hold Override 10/18/2000 GBD Condition Code: DEVO Value: Description:Dev Order Hold Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH ditional Requirements Needed 9/10/2002 .'\.* DONE BLS . 9-3-02 overpaid returned check # 7924 for $304.55 - Amount due is $212.30 ?;` a License - RENEWAL 9/11/2002 DONE 2002-2003 k5i wal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Additional Requirements Needed 10/8/2003 DONE WBS $223.80 bal due by 10/15/03 to avoid 10% late fee, letter sent Over Paid, check #3894 for $338.80 returned for reissue Issue License - RENEWAL 10/10/2003 DONE 2003-2004 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Issue License - RENEWAL 9/20/2004 DONE 2004-2005 r:\ Forms\I nfoS u m m a ry. rpt 7 - - q 'tro" prr 41 ug, rrei-?ti ? SASE SUMMARY ODSL9024561 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD • O CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 TRAVELODGE Lic: 06840, Bus phone: 446-8305 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner Business Owner -.ES AMERICAN GULF CO INC 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767-2508 CANTERBURY OAKS INC 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Assessed Amount LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL $999.35 Total $999.35 PHONE: (727) 442-9983 FAX: No Fax PHONE: 446-8305 FAX: No Fax Amount Paid Balance Due $999.35 $0.00 $999.35 $0.00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 091000 RENTAL UNITS 54 110020 VENDING MACHINES: OPERATOR 3 ACTIVITIES Issue License - RENEWAL 01-02 !sue License - RENEWAL . ,-; -:lie License - RENEWAL Issue License 10/19/1998 8/14/1999 10/27/1997 # Employees 0 0 Done Disp By DONE BLS DONE BLS DONE GBD DONE Roberta Gluski Issue License - RENEWAL 10/3/2000 DONE WBS 00/01 Additional Requirements Needed 10/3/2000 DONE WBS 00/01 renewal overpaid, returned ck#4143 for 235.45, letter sent request fee of 125.45 by 10/13/00 to avoid late fee. Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH r:\Forms\I nfoS ummary.rpt Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 9/6/2001 QCL902,4561 FVIEW B LVD 401 S GUL fro . Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH ?* newal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 8/23/2002 2002-2003 Renewal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL 9/15/2003 2003-2004 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Issue License - RENEWAL 9/13/2004 04-05 DONE DONE LRN r:\Forms\I nfoSum mary. rpt Diei%ion of Corporations • • Page 1 of 2 lftbh, cl , j? 1 "1a,1r. Florida Profit CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 Changed 12/21/2004 MAILING ADDRESS 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 Changed 12/21/2004 Document Number P98000104633 State FL Last Event REINSTATEMENT FEI Number 593573105 Status ACTIVE Event Date Filed 12/21/2004 Date Filed 12/15/1998 Effective Date NONE Event Effective Date NONE Registered Agent Name & Address COLE, MARTIN R 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 Name Changed: 01/11/1999 Address Changed: 12/21/2004 Officer/Director Detail Titl e Name & Address COLE, MARTIN R 421 GULFVIEW BLVD PD CLEARWATER FL 33767 http://www.sunbiz.orglscriptslcordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n1=P98000104633&n2=NAMFWD... 7/6/2005 DiVNion of Corporations is 0 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2003 04/09/2003 2004 12/21/2004 2005 04/15/2005 Previous Filing ( Return to List Next Filing View Events No Name History Information Page 2 of 2 Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 04/15/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT 12/21/2004 -- REINSTATEMENT 04/09/2003 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 04/11/2002 -- COR - ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 04/30/2001 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 04/11/2000 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 05/01/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT 01/11/1999 -- Reg. Agent Change 12/15/1998 -- Domestic Profit THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Coxpora?ions Inquiry L Corporations Help http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al =DETFIL&nl =P98000104633&n2=NAMFWD... 7/6/2005 Pine!'as County Property Appo or Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 1* Page 2 of 5 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 1280 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:45:24 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC OBK: 13838 OPG: 1659 T L S HOLDINGS INC C/O RED ROOF INN 421 GULFUIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 02 2003 - : sales from 20 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 9 /2,004 13,838/1,659 357,900 (M) U 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012-013 9 /1,999 10,67311,403 3,500,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 7 /1,981 5,2221 964 480,000 (0) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,973 4,0041 709 1,051 (U) I 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 340,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 340,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 340,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 7,809.60 1) 100 x 100 55.00 10, 000.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 7,809.60 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 7,809.60 Short Legal LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUB LOTS 128 AND 129 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 R PineJas County Property App0r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 1* 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 1280 Page 3 of 5 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:45:25 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 Vacant Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*1 ® Fil ®® http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr 0 Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 l6 Page 4 of 5 430 GUbF?6Vu GUAIEW BLVD 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=l &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pinerlas County Property App*r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 16 Page 5 of 5 mac. ? ?? ,.. ? M ? M 1 = i a , . ?ro R S n w"" gg 2 e _ ?. v http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 ti PiEvellas County Property App*r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0 Page 2 of 5 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 1270 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:44:54 Ownership Information Vacant Property Use and Sales CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC O BK: 13838 OPG: 1659 T L S HOLDINGS INC C/O RED ROOF INN 421 GULFUIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 002 2003 - : sales from 2 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 9 12,004 13,838/1,659 357,900 (M) U 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012-013 9 11,999 10,673/1,403 3,500,000 (M) U 0000: Book Pgs - 1211,985 6,143/ 88 5,800,000 (M) U 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 168,300 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 168,300 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 168,300 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size U nit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 3,865.75 1) 50 x 99 55.00 4,950.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3,865.75 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 3,865.75 Short Legal LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUB LOT 127 LESS W'LY 3FT T/A Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 t Piaellas County Property App6r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 06 07 1 29 / 15 1 52380 / 000 ! 1270 Page 3 of 5 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 17:44:54 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 Vacant Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) 141K 14] [If] [if] Fq IMI http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 04 Page 4 of 5 GUL$ IEW BLVD 'cORB?ADO 3507 HA.DDEIN ?. 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=-.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 S TH s ; http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pine?las County Property App*r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 06 Page 2 of 6 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 0720 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:35:24 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales CANTERBURY OAKS INC OBK: 13388 OPG: 0072 401 S GULFUIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767-2508 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 401 GUL FUIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 2 /2,004 13,388/ 72 4,480,000 (0) I 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012-013 0 /1,970 3,240/ 652 1,245 {U} I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 3,300,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 3,300,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 3,300,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 75,799.02 1} i20 x 210 110. 00 271017. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 75, 799.02 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 75,799.02 Short Legal LLOYD-WHITE-SKIHHER SUB LOTS 72, 73, 121, 122 & Description H-LY 112 OF LOT 123 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pine9as County Property App er Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 07 Page 3 of 6 Property and Land Use Code descriptions . Bui:ldin,g._l. . Building.2 Building #1 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 004 / 0720 :01 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:35:24 Commercial Card 01 of 2 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel t 4 St Property Address: 401 GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 Structural Elements Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Prestress Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 93 Bath Tile Wall Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,965 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 10,649 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 2,386 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 210 9) .00 0 4) Utility .55 170 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C omme r c i al E x t r a F eat ur e !=- Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 7000 1.50 7,000 10,500 10,500 999 2) ELEU PASS 4-STOP 30,000.00 1 30,000 15,000 1,975 3) ELEU PASS 3-STOP 30,000.00 1 30,000 15,000 1,975 4) POOL 576SF 25,000.00 1 25,000 15,000 1,975 5) PATIO/DECK 500SF 3.00 500 11500 1,020 11992 6) ELEU STOP 4-STOP 3,500.00 4 14,000 7,000 1,975 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 63,520 Building #2 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pinexlas County Property App, *r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 06 Page 4 of 6 07 / 29 / 15 / 52330 / 000 / 0720 :02 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:35:25 Commercial Card 02 of 2 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel t 4 St Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 S? ruct ur a1 E 1 sm?n? s Foundation Special Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Prestress Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 81 Bath Tile Half Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,974 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 10,746 7) Office Area 1.05 800 2) Utility .55 96 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch . 30 4,834 9) . 00 0 4) Carport .30 2,324 10) . 00 0 5) Utility .40 2,927 11) .00 0 6) Canopy .25 432 12) .00 0 Gc)mmercial Extra Fsaurss Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) FENCE 138LF 11.00 138 1,520 1,400 2,001 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 1,400 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*? Fq_] http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property Appaer Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 06 ¦ -_j i t--- ¦ STH T A01 ?`IEIt? GULF BL 'D 411 ULFVIEW BLVD L421 G?BLVD W Page 5 of 6 3-- HAR Df 342 Hk, DEN HA?v1DlN DR SrH C0RDD,AD'' / 406 S Hr -? ?DECl CORONA D0 ?1 HARDEN 0 GC?ADQ N: v1 0 DEN 2 DR ' fH D R r' Li V '" CORRNADC/ "` / W 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property App, oer Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 06 Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen Page 6 of 6 http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property App r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 07 Page 2 of 6 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 040 / 0740 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:36:04 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE OBK: 10578 OPG: 1609 6033 CRIMSON CT MCLEAN UA 22101-1818 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 411 GUL FUIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 7 /1,999 10,57811,609 212,000 (U) I 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012-013 0 /1,979 4,80211,915 200,000 (Q). I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 { } 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 410,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: HO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 410,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 410,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater view: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 9,417.45 1) 70 x 110 75. 00 7,700. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 9,417.45 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 9,417.45 Short Legal LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUB LOT 74 & N 10FT OF 75 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property App0r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 04 Page 3 of 6 . Building.._1_ . Buildinb 2. Building #1 07 / 20 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 0740 :01 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:36:01 Commercial Card 01 of 2 Improvement Type: Retail Store Property Address: 411 GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 320 Land Use: 11 S?ruc-tur,al E1?m?n?s Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Siding Average Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Wood Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 6 Bath Tile Half Wall Electric Average Shape Factor U Design Quality Average Year Built 1,940 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 1,454 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Gc ?nuT18rC1a1 ExTra F+E;a?urss Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) PATIO/DECK 1172SF 8.50 1,172 9,960 3,980 1,960 2) CONC PAVE 1000SF 3.00 1,000 3,000 3,000 999 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 6,980 Building #2 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 06 Page 4 of 6 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 0740 :02 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:36:01 Commercial Card 02 of 2 Improvement Type: Recreational Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 320 Land Use: 11 Structural E1?m?nt s Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Siding Average Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Wood Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Hard Tile Interior Finish Paneling Average Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 3 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,940 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 440 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Gommie r4-- ia1 Extra FE3 aturE3 i=- Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F+_1 0?F*`1FQ ® http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property App 0 r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 07 La UULf- 'vILWV BLVD iULFVIEW BLVD GUL EW BLVD TH T G UL F1r I E'T'V BLVD 431 f;lll F"'t+I?W "Fa l? 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) Page 5 of 6 R 7 A t N D CO DR O COR NAD DR CaR AD H DP 5:? O R ONAD0 DR 3, HAN http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l&a=l &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0 Page 6 of 6 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Page 2 of 5 Pirllas County Property Apper Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0 6 07 / 20 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 0760 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:36:35 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC OBK: 13838 OPG: 1659 T L S HOLDINGS INC C/O RED ROOF INN 421 GULFUIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 EVRC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 421 GULFUIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 9 /2,004 13,838/1,659 357,900 (M) I 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012-013 9 /1,999 10,673/1,403 3,500,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 12/1,985 6,143/ 88 5,800,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 3,800,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 3,800,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 3,800,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 87,283.72 1) 170 x 110 110.00 38,400.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 200 x 90 60.00 19, 700.00 S 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 87, 283.72 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 87, 283.72 Short Legal LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUB LOT 75 LE SS N 10FT & LOT Description 76 ALL LOT 77 LOT 124 & S'LY 25FT OF LOT 123 & ALL Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 ! P Has County Property App6r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 06 Page 3 of 5 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 0700 :01 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:36:36 Commercial Card 01 of 1 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 421 GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 Stru?c?ural E1sm?n?s Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Cone Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Prestress Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 225 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,968 Effective Age 10 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 10,174 7) .00 0 2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 27,134 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .30 7,912 9) . 00 0 4) Carport . 30 1,020 10) . 00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C omms r c i a l E xT r a F s a ur B s Description Dimensions Price 1) ASPHALT 17048 1.50 2) ELEU PASS 4STOP/P 30,000.00 3) POOL IRRG 25,000.00 4) PATIO/DECK 500SF 3.00 5) ELEU STOP 4STOP/P 3,500.00 6) UTIL/RSTRM 354SF 85.00 Units Value RCD Year 17,048 25,570 25,570 999 1 30,000 15,000 1,985 1 25,000 12,500 11985 500 1,500 750 1,985 4 14,000 7,000 1,985 354 30,090 19,860 1,985 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 80,680 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) Fil 41 Pq M http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 Pir?,,;llas County Property Appr Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 07 GIJLFVIEW BLVD TH ST- Page 4 of 5 HAMDEN DR t UN BBO LHAMDEN DR GUL?R?I EW BLVD ?c AA5 HAMDEN r+rl 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) L LIBL DEW Uri "33 DR CGRQ AJ DC? http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r--.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/6/2005 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September 20, 2005, beginning at 10:00 a.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (reconsidered from 07/19/05) The City of Clearwater is requesting reconsideration of the attached sign approved through the Comprehensive Sign Program application contained within the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application that approved a problematic use for Amscot Financial in this location. [Proposed Use: Problematic Use (Amscot)] at 1874 North Highland Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 32.08. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-01004 2. Ardent International LLC., Panaviotis and Helen Vasiloudes (M313 Development LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade & 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lots 1 & 3 and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 3. Raim & Xheziie Tzekas [A Very Important Pet (AVID) Salon] are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow pet grooming and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store and to permit a 6-ft tall fence located in front of the building (approximately 5 ft back from the N Lincoln Ave frontage), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Pet Grooming/Outdoor Training Facility) at 1242 Cleveland St, Padgett's Estates Sub, Lot 3 and parts of Lots 2 & 4. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-06058 4. Harborside Condo LLC (Mark Newkirk) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (16 existing attached dwelling units; 15 attached dwelling units proposed, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 15 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 12.4 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.3 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 4.3 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.8 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 87.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.67 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 706 Bayway Blvd, Bel Crest Condo, Units 1-12 & 14-17. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07070 5. K&P Clearwater Estate II LLC (Mark International LLC, Sunrise on the Beach Inc) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 90 ft along Coronado Dr and Hamden Dr, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.5 ft (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.13. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 229 Coronado Dr, Columbia Sub Replat, parts of Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07061 6. LOPA LLC (Patricia A. Bilotta & Lorri S. Ritter) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 3 attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 14 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to building) and a reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit (5 spaces) to 1.33 spaces per dwelling units (4 spaces), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of See 2-404.17, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to zero ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 1254 Grove St, Property of AJ Moore, Lots 14 & 15. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05042 7. Coates I, Inc. is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 9 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 621 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay unit No 5 Replat, Blk 78, Lots 5 & 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07064 8. Jerry & Teresa Tas are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 20 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 18 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 14.94 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 14.88 (to building/pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 67.5 ft along Coronado Dr and to 71.64 ft along Hamden Dr as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C.. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 342 Hamden Dr, Columbia Sub No 2, Blk A, Lot 11 & part of Lot 10, and Columbia Sub No 3, Lot 7 & part of Lot 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07066 9. Hess Properties II LLC, and Bay Esplanade Properties LLC (Stephen T Hess) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (15 existing overnight 0 0 accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 8 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) at 64 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 21 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 51.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 0 ft (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 64 & 566 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 79, Lots 3, 18. & 19 (less R/W for Clearwater St), and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07065 10. Seawake Motel Ltd (Enchantment, LLC) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 7 ft (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 15.7 ft ( to sidewalk) and from 20 ft to 14 ft (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 150 ft (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of 3 dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Dr, 4 dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Dr and 1 dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 691 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 16-19 & Rip Rts & land on S of Lot 19. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 11. Clearwater Grande Dev LLC (Steve J Page) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 6.3 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 17.6 ft (to open stairs) and from 20 ft to 8.8 ft (to pool deck), an increase to the building ht from 35 ft to 99.5 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 645-655 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07072 12. Canterbury Property Mgt Inc, TLS Holdings Inc, Dorothy C BoldoE Tre, and Canterbury Oaks Inc are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Blvd) setback from 15 ft to 5.45 ft (to building), from 15 ft to zero ft (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth St.) setback from 15 ft to 3.63 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Dr) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a 0 0 reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 401, 411, & 421 S Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub Lots 72-77, 121-122, 124, 128-129 & parts of Lots 123 & 127. Assigned Planner: W?ayue_M.-We AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07068 13. KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east)setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off- street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 and 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 14. Parkdale LLC (Belleair Harbor, LLC, Maria Nikolova) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 sq ft to 8,171 sq ft, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 ft to 60 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C, and preliminary plat approval for 2 lots. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (2 units)] at 475 East Shore Dr, Clearwater Beach Park 1st Add Replat Blk C, Lot 5 & Sub Land. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06056 15. Homeless Emergency Project is requesting Flexible Development application to permit the redevelopment and expansion of an existing residential shelter (including the expansion of the kitchen and dining area), in the Commercial District, to maintain the existing front, side and rear setbacks with the exception of a front (south) setback of 4 ft (to dumpster enclosure), and to permit off site parking, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 18 units) at 1200 Betty Ln, Fair Burn Add Blk C, Lots 7- 9. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07063 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision. and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REOUEST. Ad: 09/04/05 F ?"LD2005-07068, (276) 1216352 ONTARIO iNC 27 HARROWSMITH PL RICHMOND HILL ON L4E 2A1 00030 CANADA 440 West, Inc. Condominium Fred White 440 South Gulfview Boulevard, #203 Clearwater, FL 33767 ACOSTA, JOHN F ALCIATORE, GASTON 609 OLIVER CT ALCIATORE, NANCY J NORTH BRUNSWICK NJ 08902 - 4544 440 GULFVIEW BLVD #402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2510 ANASTASOPOULOS, GEORGE E ANASTASOPOULOS, EKATERINI 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 ANDERSON, CRAIG S 610EHINTZRD ARLINGTON HGTS IL 60004 - 2601 APPLE, JAMES R PO BOX 310474 TAMPA FL 33680 - 0474 ASKALANI LIVING TRUST ASKALANI, SANAA M BEN 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 BAKER, ROBERT E BAKER, ANN E 34 PLEASANT VIEW DR HANOVER PA 17331 - 8855 BARRY, DONALD J THE BARRY, JAMES J THE 743 MARKGRAFS LAKE DRAW WOODBURY MN 55129 - 8586 BAY LAWN 406 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 BILLINGSLEY, GARY R BILLINGSLEY, TAMERA 6883 N BUCK CREEK SHADES FAIRLAND IN 46126 - 9553 ARENSKY,ARKANDY THE ARENSKY, ELIZABETH THE 2506 STONEBRIGHE LN NORTHBROOK IL 60062 - AYO, DENNIS H 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 BALOW, RONALD D THE FOLINO, JOHN F 27989 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 4906 BARTA, GYORGY BARTA,ZSUZSA 151 ORANGEWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7585 BERGER, RALPH F THE RYAN-BERGER, ELIZABETH E 7131 ASHVILLE PARK COLUMBUS OH 43235 - 5013 BINNS, CRYSTAL A 1938 JARVIS RD COLUMBUS OH 43221 - 2772 BIRA S A APDO 333 PANAMA ZONE 1 00000- PANAMA BLOSSER, ROBERT L BOESEN, ROBERT J BOLDOG, CLARA BLOSSER, JANE A BOESEN, CHRISTIE J BOLDOG, DOROTHY 583 E ST 475 ALICES RD 2500 VIRGINIA AVE NW UNIT 1405 CARLISLE PA 17013 - WAUKEE IA 50263 - 9637 WASHINGTON DC 20037 - 1901 V') w ?A M P BELLINO INC 12016 WADSWORTH DR TAMPA FL 33626 - ALEXANDER, ANN W 6200 SW 37TH WAY GAINESVILLE FL 32608 - 5106 ANDERSON, JOHN C ANDERSON, REGINA W 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 ARQUILLA, MICHAEL P THE 1253 RICHFIELD CT WOODRIDGE IL 60517 - 7709 BAILEY, BEVERLY BAILEY, H AUBREY 103 KINGSBURY WOODS MIDDLESBORO KY 40965 - BANOUB, ATEF BANOUB, AMAL 486 KENT PL W HEMPSTEAD NY 11552 - 3340 BATIANIS, THOMAI 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 BILLINGSLEY, GARY R THE BILLINGSLEY, TAMERA A 6883 N BUCK CREEK SHADES FAI RLAND IN 46126 - 9553 BOLDOG, DOROTHY BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE 6033 CRIMSON CT M & J TRUST MCLEAN VA 22101 - 1818 PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 BREMIS, JAMES J BRETTSCHNEIDER, WILHELM BREMIS, SOPHIE 3050 BYRNWYCK # 209 1177 BROADWAY MAUMEE OH 43537 - 9739 SOMERVILLE MA 02144 - 1742 BROWN, ALAN C BUKOWSKI, WLADYSLAW BROWN, JUNE M BUKOWSKI, KRYSTYNA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #602 345 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2450 CALDERON, JULIO CALOUDIS, MARY THE CALDERON, ROSARIO 4078 CARROLL BLVD 9529 S KOLIN AVE OAK LAWN IL 60453 - 3226 UNIVERSITY HT OH 44118 - 4516 CANTERBURY OAKS INC CANTERBURY PROPERTY MGT 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD T L S HOLDINGS INC C/o: RED ROOF INN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CHAMPAGNE, ROLAND J CHESLER, RICHARD A CHAMPAGNE, HELEN L HARVARD, ELIZABETH J 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 303 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 Clearwater Beach Association Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Jay Keyes Doug Williams, President 100 Devon Drive 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 Clearwater, FL 33761 CONNELL, PETER W CONSTANTINIDES, NICHOLAS S 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1802 CONSTANTINIDES, MICHAEL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2520 1027 HILLEN ST BALTO MD 21202 - 4132 CURTIS, JAMES G CVETETIC, JOSEPH CURTIS, JOHN G CVETETIC, MARY 343 S MAIN ST 5111 ESTES AVE ANN ARBOR MI 48104 - 2137 SKOKIE IL 60077 - 3437 D'AMICO, LOUIS J DAMJANOVIC, TEREZO 410 HAMDEN DR DAMJANOVIC, MARY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 515 PARKHOLLOW LN PHILADELPHIA PA 19111 - 1365 BOLLING, CHRISTOPHER J BOLLING, ALISON J P O BOX 2696 SOUTH PORTLAND ME 04116 - 2696 BROTEMARKLE, MARTIN L SR TRUST POST, JO ANN 41130 FOX RUN RD # 509 NOVI MI 48377 - 4814 C B C I DEV GROUP LLC 475 CENTRAL AVE STE M8 ST PETERSBURG FL 33701 - CAMPBELL, JERRY D CAMPBELL, FELICIA N PO BOX 320500 FLINT MI 48532 - CARAYANNOPOULOS, GEORGE L CARAYANNOPOULOS, MARGARET P 16 CHURCHILL RD WINCHESTER MA 01890 - 1008 CHRISMAN, ROBERT D CHRISMAN, CAROLEE 3428 ADAMS SHORE DR WATERFORD MI 48329 - 4202 COLEMAN, WARREN P 1860 JANDALE TROY MI 48085 - Continental Towers 675 South Gulfview Boulevard, #1002 Clearwater, FL 33767 CZAICKI, EDWARD CZAICKI, BOZENA 332 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATR BEACH FL 33767 - 2448 DEARNBARGER, WILLIAM L 5029 KILLOWEN CT COLUMBUS OH 43230 - 4008 DECADE GULFCOAST HOTEL PTNRS J K GULFVIEW N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR # 100 WAUKESHA W153188 - 1131 DICKERSON, BETTY L 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 D'IPPOLITO, ANTHONY D'IPPOLITO, LOUISE 2925 CATHERINE DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 2102 DUNN, RICHARD A COX, PHYLLIS D 3600 CANTERBURY DR JEFFERSONTOWN KY 40299 - 3508 EKREN, YALCIN EKREN, FILIZ 3061 DEXBERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - FATTOUCH, HANY A FATTOUCH, SAMIA F 5468 PINECREST DR LOCKPORT NY 14094 - 9014 FIFTH SOUTH LLC 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1006 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - FLAVAN, JOHN M 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2529 FRANGEDIS, JOAN THE FRANGEDIS, MICHAEL 437 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 2508 DENICKE, WILLIS H JR THE DENICKE, ANTONIA M THE PO BOX 628 STEVENS POINT WI 54481 - 0628 DILLMAN, TOM L DILLMAN, SUSAN J 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 DIVACO INC 455 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 DYBA, YOLANDA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2529 ERKEN, YALCIN EKREN, FILIZ 3061 DOX BERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2003 FELL, DONALD G FELL, DIANE M 1744 STANTON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 - 2859 FINTA, EMERY J THE FINTA, PEGGY K THE 450 GULFVIEW BLVD #608 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 FLYNN, JERRY C JR 260 CHEESTANA WAY LOUDON TN 37774 - 2527 G T LEISURE CORP 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2510 DI VELLO LAND TRUST DI VELLO, FULVIO THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - DIONNE, RICHARD M DIONNE, VICKI 1 4736 ATKINS RD CLYDE TWP MI 48049 - 4504 DOURDOUREKAS, HELEN 44 COMMONS DR PALOS PARK IL 60464 - 1299 E. D. Armstrong III, Esq. Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757 FAHY, MICHAEL FAHY, MARY 16 LARK ST PEARL RIVER NY 10965 - 2815 FERGUSON, EDMUND 6133 OAK VALLEY WHITMORE LAKE MI 48189 - 9739 FIRETTO, GRACE VIOLA, MARY 500 N 13TH ST NEWARK NJ 07107 - 1318 FOUR FORTY WEST ASSN INC 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD STE 203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 GABRIEL, FATHY S GABRIEL, TERESA M 2399 HERONWOOD DR BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48302 - 0835 GABRIEL, MAGDI GABRIEL, SAID S GADDIS, SUSAN GABRIEL, SOPHIE GABRIEL, ESMAT A ALLEN, NANCY 15629 BAINTREE WAY 5 WHITE CEDAR LN 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 305 MISHAWAKA IN 46545 - 1536 HOLMDEL NJ 07733 - 2609 CLEARWATER FL' 33767 - 2509 GAERTNER,ADAM GAERTNER, ELISABETH GAMBA, WILLIAM C 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 507 2062 LAKEVIEW AVE # A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 BELLMORE NY 11710 - 4244 GEDDES, C ALEXANDER GERBER, GLYDWELL TRUST 28 CRAYFORD DR GERBER, MARGARET TRUST SCARBOROUGH ON M1 W 3136 00030 831 BAYVIEW DR LAKE GENEVA WI 53147 - 3593 CANADA GIADLA, WERONIKA GIADLA, ALOJZY 355 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 GIDARO, ARDO TILFORD, ROSEANNA 16130 WESTON RD KETTLEBY ON LOG 1JO 00030 - CANADA GLASBY, ALFRED GLASBY, KIMBERLY 902 BALD EAGLE LAKE RD ORTONVILLE MI 48462 - 8435 GOEMAN, EMMA K THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 GRATIAS PROPERTIES 1350 NW 138TH ST STE 500 CLIVE IA 50325 - 8378 GUHL, PATRICIA J TR 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 HANDLEY, ROBERT M 1501 GULF BLVD #604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2903 HENSGEN, CAROL W 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 GLEAVES, ROBERT N 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 GOGEL, EDWARD V GOGEL, EILEEN 60 ENCLAVE DR WINTER HAVEN FL 33884 - 1326 GRIMES, WALTER R 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2522 GUIRGUIS, WILSON I GUIRGUIS, FAIZA F 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 701 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 HANNAH, HUGH H III HANNAH, JAYNE F PO BOX 21281 CHATTANOOGA TN 37424 - 0281 HIGHLANDER ROCK INC 415 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2537 •GAREL-JONES, PHILIP THE GAREL-JONES, BEATA THE 120 LANDSDOWNE RD S OTTAWA ON K1 M ON4 00030 - CANADA GHALY, RAMSIS F 11136 INDIAN WOODS DR INDIAN HEAD PARK IL 60525 - GIOTAKIS, WILLIAM C GIOTAKIS, MARIA 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - GLISE, JOHN INC 3900 MARKET ST CAMP HILL PA 17011 - 4226 Duplicate GROUT, MARJORIE A THE 9912 CARRINGTON DR KNOXVILLE TN 37923 - 1963 HAJ, FRIDON ESMKHANI, MOJTABA 10443 GREENDALE DR TAMPA FL 33626 - HENNIGAN, MICHAEL G HENNIGAN, CHRISTINE A 2 OSBORN ST STONY POINT NY 10980 - HISER, RICHARD F THE 1500 BURKHOLDER DR ALPENA MI 49707 - 8165 HODGES, KEITH L HOSP, UWE 603-17 ROBINSON ST HOSP, INGEBORG A 3620 FAWN AU, RAYMOND F HAMILTON ON L8P 1Y6 00030 - 140 KIMBALL BRIDGE COVE 3620 FA CANFIELD OH H CANADA ALPHARETTA GA 30022 - 4791 44406 - 9578 IBRAHIM, FAYEZ THE 2647 LAKE SHORE DR NILES MI 49120 - 9513 JACOB, MICAH M JACOB, MICHAEL B. 5526 CABOT ST PORTAGE MI 49002 - JURACKA, PATRICIA PRICE, JOSEPH T 9180 SOUTH RD # C PALOS HILLS I L 60465 - 2131 KAMBEROS, GEORGE G KAMBEROS, EUGENIA 10346 S LAPORTE AVE OAK LAWN IL 60453 - 4733 KENIG, EDWARD KENIG, STANISLAWA 433 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 J M B & A DEVELOPERS LLC 1947 PETERS PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - JASTRZEBSKI, LUBOMIR 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2531 KALLAS, DORA KALLAS, GEORGE 3405 GULF BLVD BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3644 KARRAS, PAUL G KARRAS, CAROL M 2048 GOVERT DR SCHERERVILLE IN 46375 - 5125 KENNY, HARRY E TRUST KENNY, SHARON B TRUST 155 N HARBOR DR # 4012 -2506 CHICAGO IL 60601 - 7371 KNUTSON, BARBARA F THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2525 KOPANAKIS, NICK 35518 SCHOOLCRAFT ST LIVONIA MI 48150 - 1214 LANI, JOSEPH R LANI, CAROLE R 456 WILSON AVE STATEN ISLAND NY 10312 - 3730 LITTLE, DAVID R 1734 CASEY JONES CT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1701 KOCALIS, ANTHONY J KOCALIS, IRENE A 722 KENT RD KENILWORTH IL 60043 - 1032 KUMP, PAUL H KUMP, CORINNE F 610 PRAIRIE ST NORTHFIELD MN 55057 • JZMCCORP 415 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 JIRKOVSKY, KARL K JIRKOVSKY, CHRISTIANE 450 GULFVIEW BLVD S # 1004 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 KALLINIKOS, LOUIS KALLINIKOS, KATINA 128 GRAND AVE ETOBICOKE ON M8Y 2Z5 00030 - CANADA KATSETOS, STEVE G 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 KIRKOWSKI, JOHN A KIRKOWSKI, EDWINA J 134 E SHORE TRL SPARTA NJ 07871 - 2107 KONTRAS, STELLA B THE 4725 DIERKER RD COLUMBUS OH 43220 - 2942 LA POINTE, NORMAND J LA POINTE, LORRAINE J 450 GULFVIEW BLVD #301 -2624 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 LIMARDI, R J LIMARDI, LAURA 179 ANNADALE DR FAIRFIELD OH 45014 - 5226 LOCKART, HENRY C LOCKART, GLENDA K 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 LISTES, MARINKO LISTES, NEDJELJKA 2895 CHICOUTIMI LAVAL QC H7E 1B2 00030- CANADA LOMBARDO, JOSEPH LOMBARDO, JOANNE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 LUCARELLI, QUIRINO JR LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC LUPIENT, JAMES LUCARELLI, RACHEL 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 750 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 907 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 - 1603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2514 0 RONALD H THE UARRIE • LYRAS, LOUIS G M S P A ACQUISITION II , MAC Q LYRAS, KARENA 1585 BROADWAY 37TH FLR MAC QUARRIE, JOANNE A THE 80 CREED CR NEW YORK NY 10036 - 8200 1400 GULF BLVD # 801 CAMPBELL OH 44405 - 1277 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2830 MAIR, ALOIS MAKAR, KYRILLOS B MALATY, KHAIRY A MAIR, DEBRA A MAKAR, ZEIZAF I MALATY, EBTISAM K 2903 APPIAN WAY 669 TOMOKA DR 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #901 EASTON PA 18040 - 7706 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5856 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 MALKE, ROBERT E MALO, FOTIOS MATUSZEK, THERESA MALKE, TERESA L MALO, ALEXANDRA PROCIUK, THEODORE PO BOX 2124 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1501 140 MANCHESTER DR # 210 LARGO FL 33779 - 2124 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 BUFFALO GROVE IL 60089 - 2422 MC CAFFERY, MICHAEL G THE MC CLURE, JAMES J JR THE MC DONALD, VIVIAN A MC CAFFERY, MARGARET M THE PHELPS, K JEAN THE MC DONALD, BRENT E 46-1 REVERE RD 1 CALVIN CIR # C309 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1602 DREXEL HILL PA 19026 - 5328 EVANSTON IL 60201 - 1957 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 MC GEE, JOHN P MC INERNEY, STEVEN J MEAD, PAUL PO BOX 3455 MC INERNEY, BARBARA L MEAD, SANDRA CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 105 BAYSIDE DR 31 LINDROP ST 8455 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 LONDON SW6 2QU 00003 - GREAT BRITAIN MICH, PATRICIA J MICHALENOICK, CHARLES J MILLER, ALAN H 140 LN 570A LK JAMES MICHALENOICK, CATHERINE D MILLER, MARY G FREMONT IN 46737 - SKYLINE TERRACE 1174 WAUKAZOO DR CLAREMONT NH 03743 - HOLLAND MI 49424 - 2637 MOORE, FRANCIS H MORRILL, DANIEL MOUNAYER, JOSEPH MOORE, CLAIRE MORRILL, SANDY 12 THORNTN DR 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1501 2029 W MANITOU DR DOLLARD DES ORMEAUX PQ H91B CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 OWOSSO MI 48867 - 8727 1X8 00030- CANADA MUTLU, ULKER NATIONAL CONTRACTS INC NOVICK, CAROL A 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #908 11327 COUNTRYWAY BLVD 112 LITCHFIELD LN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 TAMPA FL 33626 - 2610 HOUSTON TX 77024 - 6016 O'NEIL, JOHN T THE ORMOND, BRIAN E ORN, DUANE L 105 GRANVILLE CT 1451 LINDENHURST DR 5415 BROOKLYN BLVD NAPLES FL 34104 - 6759 CENTERVILLE OH 45459 - 3328 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55429 - 3359 PALASKY, JON R SR PALERMO, PAMELA J PANGERE, GEORGIANN M 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 202 PALERMO, LOUIS M 13010 MONROE PL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 1855 JESSICA RD CROWN POINT IN 46307 - 9588 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1508 PAPAGEORGIOU, DEMETRIOS G PAPAGEORGIOU, LIZA 5310 LONG MEADOW RD BLOOMFIELD HILL MI 48304 - 3660 PEARL, PENNY G 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 PAPPAS, KELLIE 100 FLAX MILL RD BRANFORD CT 06405 - 2870 PENDLEY, CORBETT WAYNE PENDLEY, JANE 464 ADAMS ST DENVER CO 80206 - 4411 •PATSIS, STEVE PATSIS, EMANUEL 157 N ALLEGHANY AVE LINDENHURST NY 11757 - 4129 PENNINGTON, JANICE THE 450 GULFVIEW BLVD # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2522 PIAZZA, LENO P POLSTON, STEPHEN M PONTIKOS IRENE ZORZIT, MARK J POLSTON, JEAN M , 193 COUNTRYSIDE DR 443 ROWELL AVE 440 N GULFVIEW BLVD # 1701 BROADVIEW HTS OH 44147 - 3415 SAULT ST MARIE ON P6C 51-3 00030 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CANADA IRENE PONTIKOS PORTER, CHARLES D POZIOS, THOEFANIS , 193 COUNTRYSIDE DR PORTER, PATRICIA A POZIOS, KOULA BROADVIEW HTS OH 44147 - 3415 15411 OAKWOOD DR 825 MICHIGAN AVE URBANDALE IA 50323 - MARYSVILLE M148040 - 1404 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE PROKOP, MARILYN M PRYOR, CAROL 419 EASTSHORE DR 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1006 2346 ROSE GARDEN RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 PITTSBURGH PA 15220 - 4029 QUERUBIN, KATHERINE R T V PROPERTIES INC RACHOWICZ, EDWARD 627 SAXONY BLVD PO BOX 3835 RACHOWICZ, MAE ST PETERSBURG FL 33716 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8835 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1502N CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 RAMASWAMY, ASHOK REED, AUDREY L REESE, POLLY C 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #708 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 902 PO BOX 400 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2525 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 MIDDLESBORO KY 40965 - 0400 RICKS, WALTER A SR THE ROPP, WALTER S RUCKNAGEL, MELBA A THE RICKS, MILDRED H THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1503N RUCKNAGEL FAMILY TRUST 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 8812 FOX PARK DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2514 SAINT LOUIS MO 63126 - 2310 RYAN-KOUDELKA, DEBORAH A SAAD, FATHY Z SANTOSTEFANO, ROBERT THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #706 SHENODA, SAMIRA S 14800 GREEN VIEW RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2525 2626 DURANT OAKS DR ORLAND PARK IL 60462 - 1994 VALRICO FL 33594 - 5932 SAVOIE, NORMAN SCHAAF, MICHAEL L SCHNEIDER, ROGER B SAVOIE, ROSEMARIE MUDIE, AUDREY SCHNEIDER, LYNETTE V OLD MOUNTAIN RD 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 506 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #707 P O BOX 331 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 EASTHAMPTON MA 01027 - 0331 SCHULTE, CHARLES W SCHWALBE, MARTIN E • SCHULTE, COLLEEN M SCHWALBE, GLENDA J 145 MARINA NA DEL JOHN RAY 3723 LAKEWOOD SHORES DR 139 HAMILTON RIVER RD 145 M - HOWELL MI 48843 - 7889 LABRADOR NL AOP 1 EO 00030 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 7 CANADA SCIBA, ROBERT E SCICCHITANO, ANTHONY F SCIMONE, PETER L SCIBA, JANE L SCICCHITANO, JANICE M SCIMONE, ROSALIE L 47647 PINE CREEK CT 2701 ASTON AVE 18555 ALEXANDER RD NORTHVILLE Ml 48167 - 8527 PLANT CITY FL 33566 - 9594 WALTON HILLS OH 44146 - 5351 SCOURTES, GEORGE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 SGOUPIS, JAMES SGOUPIS, ANNE 137 93RD ST BROOKLYN NY 11209 - 6201 SHAW, WILLIAM M SHAW, GEORGINA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1508 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 SHIRSAT, SHAM S SHIRSAT, MADHAVI S 28 CAMBRIDGE DR OAK BROOK IL 60523 - 1705 SIMMONS, JEAN M MC CULLOUGH, GARY S 857 SUNDANCE CIR OSHAWA ON L1J 8135 00030 - CANADA SOBIESZCZYK, HARRY A JR SOBIESZCZYK, BARBARA L 581 N 4TH AVE ADDISON IL 60101- 2273 SOLU, EMINE F THE SOLU, SULEYMAN S THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2531 SEURYNCK, ELIZABETH THE SEYER CORP 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1101 80 MAIN ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 MILLVILLE PA 17846 - SHAH, JUGALKISHOR B SNAPPY, WILLIAM A SHAH, MANNA J SNAPPY, PATRICIA L 326 HAMDEN DR 109 CHENEY HILL LN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 RUTLAND VT 05701 - SHELDAHL, ERIC A 3815 NW 109TH ST URBANDALE IA 50322 - 2022 SIDKY, EMILY SIDKY, SONYA M 5451 S WOODLAWN AVE # 3 CHICAGO IL 60615 - 5209 SLEDZ, WILLIAM H SLEDZ, SHARON R 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SOFRONAS, JAMES SOFRONAS, CHRISTINE 431 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 SHERRY, BEATRICE 828 WATER ST MEADVILLE PA 16335 - 3452 SILVONEN, LINDA J 26501 S RIVER RD HARRISON TOWNSHIP MI 48045 - SMERLING, GEORGETTE 38 OLD DAIRY RD TRUMBULL CT 06611 - 4954 SOLIMAN FAMILY ENTERPRISES LLC 7533 JOMEL DR -2508 SPRING HILL FL 34607 - 2018 SOLU, EMINE F THE SOLU, SULEYMAN S THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2531 SORRENTINO, ROSA THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #505 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 STACH, ISABELLE M STAMIS, CONSTANTINE STRAMAGLIA, JOHN 2134 ANDREWS CT STAMIS, ETHEL R STRAMAGLIA, JEANNINE L DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 4839 505 MANAWA TR 4025 GOSS MT PROSPECT IL 60056 - 3719 SCHILLER PARK IL 60176 - 1827 SUESS, BERNARD H SUMMER, CLAIRE D TRUST SUN WEST PALMS DEV LLC 1100 OLD POST RD 7635 EADS AVE # 106 409 HAMDEN DR S PERKASIE PA 18944 - 1582 LA JOLLA CA 92037 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SUTHERLAND, JOHN J SYKES, WILLIAM E SZLECHTA, WLODZIMIERZ SUTHERLAND, PEGGY E SYKES, HELEN N KUNOWSKA, EWA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1504 421 HAMDEN DR 333 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2537 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 TAS, JERRY THOMAS, FRANKLIN J THOMAS, NABIL S TAS, TERESA THOMAS, JOYCE E THOMAS, SAMIA 342 HAMDEN DR 8364 GOLDEN PRAIRIE DR 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 TAMPA FL 33647 - 3241 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - TIDD, JAMES A TIDSWELL INC TIKRITI, GARY D THE TIDD, VICKI A 419 CORONADO DR 2849 CHANCERY LN 5861 ROGERS RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1427 JAMESTOWN OH 45335 - 8713 TRAKAS, ANNA THE TRUHAN, JOSEPH G US-EURO-TRADE INC 1616 SHERIDAN RD # 10G 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1007 346 HAMDEN DR WILMETTE IL 60091 - 1851 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 USHER, CEDRIC VASILAROS, SOPHIA RD, THOMAS G USHER, SHEILA VASILAROS, JACK WARD, T HAMPTON CLOSE 40 CASTLE AVE 111 BAYSIDE DR T2817 ARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 8426 CLONTARF DUBLIN 3 00003 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 IRELAND WECHSLER, RENATE THE WEEDEN, SAM W WEIS, JAY B 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1101 WEEDEN, BETTIE I WEIS, ERIK J CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #703 2227 7TH ST NW CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 ROCHESTER MN 55901 - 0206 WERTH, KENNETH D WHITE, FREDERICK T WILK, THOMAS J WERTH, PAMELA A WHITE, LINDA M WILK, STASIA 120 BARRINGTON CIR 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1806 451 HARBOR DR S ALPENA MI 49707 - 4101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2520 INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 3118 WILLARD, GILLIAN M WOOLUM, KAYETTE WOOLUM, KERRY L 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #807 201 DEAN HILL DR WINKLER, DWIGHT L CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2514 PINEVILLE KY 40977 - 528 KENTUCKY AVE PINEVILLE KY 40977 - 1343 WYROZEMSKI, WALTER YANTEK, MINERVA YOWELL, KENNETH P WYROZEMSKI, MARY 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1008 YOWELL, CINDY W 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 132 ALBEMARLE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - PENLLYN PA 19422 - 1127 ZAMMIT, ALFRED G ZAMMIT, DAVID 1900 THE COLLEGE WAY # 1805 MISSISSAUGA ON L5L 5Y8 00030 - CANADA ZUGALJ, IVON J ZUGALJ, MILKA 1044 E 165TH ST SOUTH HOLLAND IL 60473 - 2573 ZIELINSKI, DETLEF R ZIELINSKI, MONIKA 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #805 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 ZIMMERMANN, GUNDER 12912 CASTLEMAINE DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 4470 r- i To: Clearwater Planning Department Please find attached letters of "No Obiection" from the immediate neighbors of the proposed Sienna Sands Project (case FLD2005-07068) ORIGINAL 2005 'PLANNING & DEVELC t- ...;1 f' S'JCS CITY OF rl FAh.VJA' ER 4 To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Siena Sands project located at 401 S. Gulfview (case FLD2005-07068), please accept this as a letter of "No Objection" to this project. Print Signature Signature Property Address Phone Number 7 2 - 4-4--? ~ 12 CC: Clearwater Planning Department Clearwater City Council ORIGINAL t 2005 L -? iF-? • To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Siena Sands project located at 401 S. Gulfview (case FLD2005-07068), please accept this as a letter of "No Objection" to this project. i Print Signature ; Q ?- e W it ??'} S K t Signature /4 43,1' D?,- t I JA PA L) V&tA J- ?, Property Address Phone Number 7 `' S7 1? CC: Clearwater Planning Department Clearwater City Council 0" ORIGINAL i I SEP ; 2005 J PLAN-r: r? J 1k" . C.IiYC;r (:.E....?. .?. June 6, 2006 Burdette - Page 3 Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, r Michael Delk, P Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmenACD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationsIGulfview S 0401 - 0421 Siena Sands (7) - Approve&Gulfview S 401 - 421 Minor Revisions Letter 6.6.06doc ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT /?j?/' q/n Q 41?:a?"' Pos-r Or•1=iu: Box 4748, Cu.:AkWA,,:a F1.oRIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL S[.'wi(a:s I3uu.rn`G 100 Soutt Myii-n.l: AvrNur, CLGARWATE.V, P1.omDA 33756 TELEPHONE, (727) 562-4567 P,vc (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIANNING Drvla.0I'MI?NT Rl:vu:W Joe Burdette Owners Representative for Siena Sands 618 Pineland Avenue Belleair, FL 33756 Re: Development Order - Minor Revision FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Burdette: June 6, 2006 On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 15 conditions the above referenced case, which was for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. A proposal has been submitted to revise the approved site and building plans with the following: 1. The six-story parking garage has been eliminated and replaced with two levels of parking generally dispersed over the entire property. This reduces the parking garage in the southeast portion of the site from six stories to two stories. This also increases the parking garage generally elsewhere from only the ground level to two levels. 2. Due to the change in the number of parking levels, dwelling units formerly located on the Level 2 have been relocated to upper floors, with the exception of six one-story villas located on the west side of Level 2. These villas have access via stairs and elevators to the amenities located on Level 3 and have individual stair access to the ground level. Three townhomes on the west side have been redesigned as part of the overall unit layout. Dwellings on Levels 3 through 10 continue to be located in the same general location and layout, with a separation between portions of the building at Level 8. The overall appearance is generally consistent with that approved by the CDB. I KANK I111M ND. i\IA)(W JuiLN DORA\, Cui M:ILMEMMIN I IMT I 1U111:WN, Curx auu. liar liu i. Jc i?>u?, Cni xc 1.\1EAfl:r. ® (:.Vti FN A. I'P-rersr.x: (;Ol NCH Au N11 r. „I:( i,AI, I"MITM Mu;N i AN 1) Ai;ririvi: Ac: rR 1N I?:UPLrn .R" June 6, 2006 Burdette - Page 2 3. The pool previously located on Level 2 at the northwest corner has been relocated to Level 3 more central to all units on the west side of the building. Amenity rooms are centrally located on Level 3. 4. Setbacks originally approved are maintained or exceeded, even with the revised building design. 5. Driveway locations on Coronado Drive generally are maintained in the same location as the approved plan. In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be a minor revision and are approved. These minor revisions must be shown on the site plans and building plans when submitting for building permits, with the following additional changes from the plans submitted May 17, 2006, and approved under this Minor Revision: 1. Sheet A2.01 - a. Relocate the sidewalk shown on the subject property paralleling the north property line to be within the right-of-way of Stn Street; b. Ensure the sidewalk adjacent to the front property line of South Gulfview Boulevard is the required width; and c. The location and amount of sidewalk adjacent to the south and southwest portions of the building will be determined at time of building permit, to provide maximum planting area while ensuring the provision of required egress. 2. Both the west and north elevations fail to show the stairwell for Villas 4, 5 and 6 on Level 3. 3. Sheet A2.02 - Same comments as for Sheet A2.01 above. 4. Sheet A2.03 - a. There are two Unit 12's. Revise southwest unit to Unit 11; b. Relocate the 15-foot setback dimension from the northwest corner (where it doesn't indicate much) to the northeast portion of the building to indicate the dimension from the front property line of 5t'' Street to the unit walls; and c. Dimension the width of balcony projections (to not exceed two feet) for Units 1, 11 and 12. 5. Sheets A2.04 and A2.05 - Same comment as comment 4c above. 6. Sheet A3.01 - Decorative aluminum entry gates for the villas are indicated facing South Gulfview Boulevard, which, according to the design indicated on Sheet A2.01, these entry doors face north or south (not west). 7. Elevations - The exterior colors submitted are conceptually acceptable, with the potential exception that the colors need to fall within the Beach by Design list where the darker color may need to be lightened. I could not locate color "D - Sedona clay." Will need to submit color samples/chips with building plans for approval. 8. A stop bar shall be provided at the base of the down ramp on the first floor. This will force vehicles coming down from the second level to stop before entering the drive aisle on the first floor. 9. The proposed parking spaces along 5th Street shall be coordinated with the Beach Walk plans. As these spaces will be located in the public ROW, they may be removed or modified by the City at any time with no compensation to the Siena Sands developer. F s 1. LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 September 30, 2005 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Armstrong: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to 5.45 feet (to building), from 15 feet to zero feet (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth Street) setback from 15 feet to 3.63 feet (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Drive) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILLJONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIIMEMBER HOrr HAMILTON, COUNCIL MEMBER ?, CARI.EN A. PETERSEN, COUNCII-MEMBER "EQUAL, EMPLOYMENT AND AFFI1RMATIV . ACTION EMPLOYER" 4 ' CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 September 30, 2005 Armstrong - Page 2 3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building), as well as the existing overhead- electric for streetlights within Coronado Drive, be placed underground. The Utility Plan shall be revised to indicate compliance with this requirement prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That any future signage meet the requirements of Code and any freestanding sign be a monument- style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 5. That the Landscape Plan be amended prior to the issuance of any permits to indicate landscape materials and design for the courtyard area off South Gulfview Boulevard; 6. That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. That approval of this request is subject to the vacation by the City of an existing five-foot wide sidewalk easement on the property. Evidence of such vacation of this easement, as well as written permission to build in the Florida Power Corp. (Progress Energy) easements, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That plans indicate the connection of the decorative architectural pavement to the arcade off South Gulfview Boulevard, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That inconsistencies between the tree removal data on the demolition plan and the tree removal data on the Landscape Plan be addressed, as well as clearly indicating trees to be preserved, prior to the issuance of any permits; 10. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the east elevation drawing of the architectural plans be amended to show the northern motor court and northern ground level entrance to the under building parking area; 11. That prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy an easement be recorded for the public sidewalk located on the subject property along Coronado Drive; 12. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 13. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; and 15. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Ap v 4 September 30, 2005 Armstrong - Page 3 Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-5624504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.iDyclearwater.com/ og v/dgpts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael Delk, AI Planning Director S: Planning DepartmenACD BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationsIGulfview S 0401 - 0421 Siena Sands (7) - ApprovedlGulfview S 401 - 421 Development Order.doc 4G I n,. C p y E ? +a_. A __ya THE FUTURE OF CLEARWATER, BEACH C L E A F W A T E R F L O R I D A ,?,ACH VuAi?.,.[ Imagine a winding beachside promenade with lush landscaping, artistic touches and clear views to Clearwater' award-winning beach and the water beyond, a place where bicyclists, rollerbladers and pedestrians all have safe and convenient , access and where visitors and locals can socialize, dine, play games or simply enjoy the spectacular sun and surf. THIS IS BEACH WALK / Five years in development, Beach Walk is designed to revitalize the community that surrounds Clearwater's popular south beach destination, which has played host to generations of visitors from all over the world. Part of the city's "Beach by Design" plan, it has already played a vital role in attracting new hotel development to the beach in a time when many older hotels are being converted in to condominiums, threatening our community's tourism industry. The $16 million project will transform the look and feel of south Clearwater Beach and bring new vitality to the area, providing a setting that complements j the beauty of the true destination: our pristine, white beaches. So please, take a look at the plans and visit us often at www.myclearwatercom. Beach Walk is the future of Clearwater Beach. A POINT IN TIME Beach Walk is being constructed in four phases. Phase I: Coronado Drive Construction time: Approx. 12 months The first phase provides pedestrian improvements to Coronado Drive,just east of the beach, and will take approximately one year to complete.Wide sidewalks will be added and the road will be converted to three lanes. Phase II: North Gulfview Boulevard Construction time: Approx.12 months t The second phase is the construction of the north end of Beach Walk, relocating Gulfview Boulevard through the existing parking area,and constructing wide r promenades on both east and west sides of the new road. _ I Phase III: South Gulfview Boulevard Construction time: Approx. 12 months The third phase of the project is the construction of the south end of Gulfview Boulevard, which will mirror improvements made during phase II. Phase IV: The Finishing Touches Construction time: Six months This phase will consist of "clean up" work, restoration of dunes and decorative touches prior to completion of the project I S J ?M C C ? ? l C L E A R W A T E R F L O R I D A I U-ACH?, K I A& I v1 Ir. ? ^`. , 6 Turtle showers are sure to please younggacid-the- young at heart y Phase IV:. A ?.- s -Z;Finishing 7ouihes"%? , lav, 1% ep ?cPhaseVll°q W * r ?,r sR fl nri ?° *?? T T M? SautkQfview$oulei rd fr }> ?pGO ; ??: *. tseoatCeFprIt ,r d ._ .e ;W 9 m ? W i% a,lrz?°=??M;M of ..?, y "ollr'l1?iE', Promenade featuring beautiful beach views and unique shops extending along South Gulfview Boulevard i Cen al Plaza with sundial and water featwre o5i n m m tor, ? Decorative brick designs adorn beach access _ points' e P ?m7? F@ 1 ule r,o 1, x \\ nuTationS Degaltment WHY BEACH WALK Tourism is Clearwater`s number one industry, and the beach is at the center of that tourism. City and tourism officials recognized that, in order to meet the expectations of visitors in the new millennium, there was a need to improve the atmosphere surrounding our beautiful beaches. With more permanent residences going up on the beach, it was important, too, to preserve overnight accommodations for the millions of visitors who come back year after year. Beach Walk is designed to bring visitors closer to the beach and provide an environment that will draw new hotel, retail, entertainment and restaurant business for out-of-town visitors, residents and day trippers. Already, several newtrotel projects are in development in part because of the improvements .promised by Beach Walk. Modern amenities and a true "beachside experience" is what Beach Walk is ail about. It will set Clear`wotter'apart as a destination for Tampa Bay, the region an?,the world. In short, Bea gl isfhe future of tourism in Clearwater. b.i? ?7A ?/ry TRAFFIC AND PARKING o LL ? cr D Q a ° o m ° ° <' Z N NZ in FM any have asked what effect the project will have on traffic and parking on the beach. By adding a center lane to Coronado Drive, m ° ¢ w N0 a traffic engineers project an efficient flow of cars through the area, C6 W (L a though during peak times visitors can still expect some slow movement. To compensate for beachside parking lost due to Beach Walk, the city has negotiated that 400 public parking spaces be included in the Hyatt development on south Clearwater Beach, and we continue to negotiate for new parking as other properties are redeveloped. The goal of these negotiations is to create a net increase in available parking, though initially there will be a slight reduction. Surface parking lots on the north and south ends of Beach Walk will be only minimally affected, and parking on the north end of Clearwater Beach will be entirely unaffected. . ? f vn ?2 LL " r qty V/ L CUBS 63 2ETT CHUCK JONES, AIA PRINCIPAL 1213 E. 6TH AVENUE YBOR CITY TAMPA, FLORIDA 33605 (813) 228.8000 FAX (813) 228.0770 chuck@cgharchitects.com www.cgharchitects.com Taylor Woodrow Terry L. Foote Vice President Design and Entitlements Dir 727.369.0643 Cell 813.334.7557 terry.foote@us.taylorwoodrow.com Taylor Woodrow 877 Executive Center Drive West Suite 205 St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2472 Tel 727.563.9882 Fax 727.563.9674 www.taylorwoodrowhomes.com - ?utu? CoMfl4Q1?tl ?N ?' a' l o' 2A' 4a? Gd' ?0' SAN 415, 06 r ? (,C?FV 4CLhH??' r 04? \ 000, ood UNE e,ar1 t _ m 1 1 +-T# - FIGPt= utq - - -- IT JL- [LIRa - RES LA io [t103'-a b DES LVL 5 b_ CLw'o'. RE LSLs CLl,9'{1' 4L T RES L p' LT.i'. b_ {. RESLVL6 n RC$ LVls CL53'1Y n RES LVL4 n [L43W ' ? - ASJE`IMPES. L I C 7 ffW1 C i ? CLw' * - CLU' m NSW ?/ATIaN -"` OW4INd - EIzViCf114N -- -- TFAM VY 1MA4 (*0*-' c aRaua?o R.) JAN 0 6 scar. =4a-0 ?HJ au,Hr?s t R.i ° ?. B B E Min ° o a Q 0 .0 Li TECNOVERFIT! • R?1 ° I ' T•I - G•3 R-1 G•3 o????????? ?? o? -- - ?' 13 El 0 - Td ? ? LF:YFL3 . . + ? L ` * Qn (n) .. ®d n 11 .n 0 E A-A1LEWRtmwzT0' 8L1J17. 1V1A1L'rt liar ?LDV.GIVJJ: .; . B •lERp4RTAVSmRn ..: .. ' - c•Ewl?'ealEBnm' WALL FMi9NES R00r- G-GOLDELG4IERID'BI . . E'9ED"CIAYem7DU R(SOT B m•I.CE'@imID9HR9IC1EhRQNmG1. HARED) RBI GAYBAI?.NERaT81MD1' P•ARfEYM2M1C A p.T. C3WmA0$F@WH(PARNW ' .TETIWSDd#i,Rti11CFAdN ma.emor€LNESacAW+mwsRNw MISG TRIM I ACGENT& ruA avD46cg4o - n•I'• PARAM . Td.CE'@7m109A0'JIOr9tDlCWAiIYEEIFAffdi(P4NIED).. H•J.GO@dII17HFMp11PdCdEDlOVERGIIG@fhY . T3.t$Nm110BPWR70VERDFCOPAINEEBbFEANfEfpANI®) WIMALCAPMAHDDI T4 D=PAIPEFIFAbJFUN9WCM=arFLSH(PARIED) ns,ctlMlimaNlT7URrraarED)04E72aucl@!&r 1d.CNRHHROWW?IRIOhRDFCIX+ditYEE0AR41AaXA9 m/ClAYPRFEInZcAp ' • BVM(PANW) M4 . Dt'C?MCLAYMVDVS GUARDRAILS/NANDRAIL& OmYAIwm ns. DKORgNCd1VBIFIi?llNAAGODkD) n.6. FFE40T*K$T0ffAWMnCT020C="..' . n•1'.DF,CMr&ALOIMH(AWAUm)0MGATE BH..um?amdFA+BUrmraaararFn W0UI?IBP.UA59W .Br41@I n•8 •VW4PATP&AlWlMMDWOO (AN;D®) • A.1 64 - BAUMM . BAlU97PADp J ° M M°FEE]. D F FEE 0 0 n•6. .i GINillett 1?Lssoaates ARDT GROUP CO$pOAAT]SD Architectme • Planing S2Tasota•M+amT.LDadGa . 1543101 Second Street Sarasota, Florida 34236 941-957-4477 941.957-4151 Fax dd@giUettardt.com ' AA9002317 , AR0007496 - HECN eR SM? . + J - -?AjYX?E-.-tlr• 5 I -TI G•1 E ? ? O - --- M r? ? " AM- k. W 0 u -m-nL 10- s ?1 ?I -m = LEVEL1.14'•S4_0_ • 't THESE DOCOMEHTS AdE INSTAUIRENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AND MAY _ .NOT HE COPIED OR'OSED IW ANY FASHION EXCEPT PATH THE PEAMI6910N OP THE • ' ARCHITECT AND MAN, ONLT BE USED FOR THE'REFERENCEOPA0.MCT4N ACCORDANCE NATH FEDERAL COPYRIGHT ..' LAN. DATE: AUGUST 4, 2005 © Copyright 2005 EA S (? I J? EAS 1 /SOUT H SCALE: T`.= 20'_0° ELEVATION EASTVATION ELEVATION CTRAPN(G SCALE ? 2 mRr"11W-. 2W 3V .J40 .?.? ,?..?..? SHEET NUMBER: SCALE N FEET. :c n >r 6 16 a+ s ?-LEVEl3.-- E a• -- LPrELI.M 8 d - _ a -, I '-? BEEBFE oop` FID] luuf m 0 0 Fl 01 MD® FMI M ®® [FBI Imm ® '®® 0 ® ®® ?a ®® 13 E ) 1 • , A• AILNJRTA?'SDDDD' .,..v. AruaAUt\arwu Ll)LIA)1\L ,'_' D•ffiR5DIIANSEfi7 :: '. C•PKIFT?arJSFUDrD o•GaDDVGDe?xM WALL MIMES. B F. 5ECCN4CL1YW2dD• WI:CD0111R010NG41VAtRI1DLLi.(PAertFw R-1 - CLAY B4MMnE RXP SY9N11 F-E€pC,6NEM1DfxWDn W•CDfERiOaDFNN10MNIFp1 YELL4WW6VrF llCE49M . dH.SWfEtCEDNC9@lWRIO8100SN h115GA TRIM 4 ACCENTS DA5Avw=sv20Ea - • ' MJ-PAUM i•1,.GTE1DIrtDDRO.VIDRRbEWRAMEPBBIR#t(PAOIIEDI tbi. COMMIaIB"M0ANND)ovERCMcN"EY T-0. CD9NIIAOARflsk CAR DWORAWE WFS. RAnW MANED) 'WlWAL C,P(PANW) T3.VE0WAZSEBAC0FWAWCINDMOOWFMSH(PAWED) M•3. CSIDIM00FM(PAWED)OVER CMORI7 Td-COWATUMR&9 MIRPrWFAIAEE)FATFINAM" WCIAY8AJM7UWP IRDNDRAMED) M.4- MWPAT@FCIATIAE`ein$ Md.OECOPAIAEALT MTFADCowlFD) WARDRAILSIFIAMSRAiUS awus,D,0M) M$.PREtA5T69tOaMARTETPDRPAcoUENS tF7 . DFWPATWAI" M(A WW®)EMREGAIE G•I-ACWR.DAU0U1aHR7FALGf51EM' : DEWWTKAL"MlFWNWW(A47D? Me 04.AYAIlEDAIP@)MCiFfP.GIl59ANROpAI10t9ID7 . ' 04 .DeLVSmAWa rrill Gillett Associates ARDT CROUP IN?q ORPO RpiBD Architecture - PlRnning Sarasota -MtFrAi -London 1543-101 Second Street Sarasot%.Hcdda 34236 941-957-0477 941-9574151 Fax dd@gMettatdtcom AA0002317., AR0007496 R•1 . ED M R-I 11ctH 04ER Pl J1 I? R w ,' CI It (J ®® a a ?r ? ? ? ® ® 0000000000 OPMto0F9IA5? ®o ® .?• b ® 0000 . T --- LEVEI_3?,,, ® ® F1 ll ®®® D I _ M•0 V/1 THESE DOCUMENTS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESBIONAL SERVICE AND MAY NOT BE COPIED 00 USED DH ANY FASHION ' ' ' - EXCEPT WITH THE PERNUSION OF THE ARCHITECT' AND MAY ONLY BE USED FOR THE REFERENCED PROJECT M ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAW. DATE:, AUGUST 4, 2005 © Copyright 2005 ?II E SCALE: f = 20'•0" . W .V i ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION GRAPHIC SCALE, 2' L..W IV IV SHEET NUMBER: SCALE MFEEL• 1" = 20' A3.03