The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-05047w n?F ORIGINAL ? Ia FLD2005-05 47 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Date Received: 05/26/2005 TW RESIDENCES RECEIVED .IUL 11 2005 ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 276A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW PLANNING DEPARTMENT MY OF CLEARWATER CLWCoverSheet ? r Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 tff Telephone: 727-562-4567 <:;f • ?....;,,?^ s .. ?,:•E- Fax: 727 562 4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATIONFEE$ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) nRIGINAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIO Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) -- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT - A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: TW/Beach Residences --Clearwater, L.L.C. MAILING ADDRESS: 727-563-9882 PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Same as Applicant. CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH. SOUTH: WEST: EAST: .(Must bclude ALL owners as listed pgthe deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: E. D. Armstrong'III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP MAILING ADDRESS: P. 0. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 PHONE NUMBER: 727-461-1818 FAX NUMBER: 727-462-0365 CELL NUMBER: 727-563-9674 FAX NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: eda@ipfirm.com 472 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? V 430 South Gulfview Boulevard STREET ADDRESS of subject site: See Exhibit "A" attached. - 2005 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: f not listed her ``?ease no a the local' of this document in the submittal) 7 f '7 ( DEPARTMENT PLANNING 07 Z9/15 52380 000/0330 PARCEL NUMBER: CRY OF CLEARWATE-W- PARCEL SIZE: 2.45 acres, (acres, square feet) Multi-use project, consisting of 112 condominium units, PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) 78 overnight accommodation units and 2,910 square feet of retail. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Exhibit "B" attached. Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations: e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Will Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 qRIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES X NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit k?Bk' attached for responses to Criteria 1 through-6. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or-w 'n in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. AIL 11 2005 - 'Pulm 411YING DEPARTMENT Aft- ARWATER 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ? 1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria 1 through 10. Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 ORANAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive Will redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater: 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. JUL 1- 1- HAD;- PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with t City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. - Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Ack dg a of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing bees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) E® ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): V 3?c' I ??? All dimensions; III????..J// L? North arrow, Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; JUL 1 1 2005 Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; PLANNING DEPARTMENT Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; C11Y QE CLEARWATER All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ? • ORIGINAL Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)() and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FA.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offske elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating.to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approva); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. RECE JUL 11 2005 LANING DEPARTMENT Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of CleaAC CL CARMVATER lr, • * ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/ X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/: X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legman ach turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. affic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City re resentatives to v siTphotograph the property described i is application. E. D. Armstrong III ?1?r.11?11t? /1r.= JUL 11 2005 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me this"J4 day of May A.D. 20 c to me and/or by E. D_ Armstrnng TTT who is personally known to§ pKWC=CtXX X X Notary public, '- "-? My commission expir LINDA R. CUNNINGHAM : kJY f`N er nnr,n... I = EXP!AES: JUIy 4, 2008 _ - Pp ;`,.•` 9ontled Il ru Notary P ubiic Unrk_nvrlters Page 6 of 7 kX4??jig gy?gQgyey?S ,q??hNTve Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater CCITYOFvCL CEACRW tAT?ERV ? • ? ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: lYY?Dl_,tit.R +«'•.71Lrr1V ?.G.7-\.Lii[ItC,WH1L, YC, L.•L.(?., a L"10r1da limited liability company (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location); 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater (.Adam's Mark Hotel) 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 Flexible development approval for a comprehensive infi 1. redevelopment project and transfers of development rights to the property as a Receiver Site. 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire, and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns LLP as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater. Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described In this application; 6. That (fte), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. TV/BEACH. RESIDENCES-CLE AT , L.L.C., a F a. limited liability com any oseph P. Covell Owner STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF PINELLAS ). Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of July . 2005 personally appeared JoSeph P. Covelli as Vice Pres.W'ho having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. W _r ; s p ers o . u1 i y k„ o w a 4. me. *of TW/BEACH RESIDENCES-CLEARWATER, L . L . C . J PARY PUBUC-SWE OF FLORIDA Notary Public My Commission Expires: Rita Jane IacinO Expires: DEC. 20, 2008 Bonded Thru Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. S: (planning DepartmentlApplication Formsidevelopment reviewlpexible development application 2005.doc X E ? WER) JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CtEARWATER E ORIGINAL EXHIBIT "A" A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF. RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33, RUN SOUTH 77° 41'16' WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE; RUN THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT (RADIUS -1247.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET, (CHORD BEARING - SOUTH19° 07'51" EAST); RUN THENCE NORTH 68° 55'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 36; RUN THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS 36, 35, 34 AND 33, WHICH LINE IS A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS - 847.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET (CHORD - 235.0 FEET, CHORD BEARING - NORTH 20° 17' 10" WEST) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS: A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT AN IRON PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE PC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 847.00 FEET AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AND ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 20° 17'10" EAST AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 235.00 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE RUN SOUTH 68° 55'27" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO AN IRON PIN, SAID POINT BEING THE PC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1247.00 FEET AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 19° 07' 51" WEST AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 296.09 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE RUN NORTH 77° 41'16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET TO A POINT AND BACK TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. RECEVED JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, L.L.C. 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Section B. Description of Request The applicant, TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, L.L.C. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Taylor Woodrow, plc, a London-based organization that has operated in the U.S. for over 65 years. Taylor Woodrow was founded over 80 years ago and is one of the largest and most prestigious builders in the world with annual revenues exceeding $5 billion. The applicant has purchased the Adam's Mark hotel site, located at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard and proposes to redevelop the property with a mixed use project, consisting of 112 condominium units, 78 overnight accommodation units and 2,910 square feet of retail sales and services. Specifically, the applicant seeks flexible development approval of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, in accordance with the plans submitted with this application, including relief as follows: a. Termination of non-conforming status to allow: the existing density of 217 hotel rooms, the equivalent of 162 residential dwelling units (87 units per acre), where 56 residential dwelling units (30 units/acre) are allowed by the current zoning (Tourist) and land use designation (RFH); b. Transfers of development rights (10 residential dwelling units) to the site from four sender sites, as described in TDR Applications submitted with this request; c. An increase of the maximum building height to allow proposed condominium with height of 149'6" to flat roof deck; d. An increase of the maximum building height to allow proposed hotel with height of 99' 10" to flat roof deck; R e, Decorative cupolas as architectural embellishments located 24' above the flat roof deck of the hotel and condominium buildings; JUL 11 205 f. Relief from CCCL setback to allow structures located 5' landward of the CCCL on the north side and 8' landward of the CCCL on the west side, PLMNING DEPARTMENT where a 20' setback is required; COV OF CLEAPIWAIT 4 g. A front (east) setback along Gulfview Boulevard for structures other than buildings of 0', where 0' to 15' is required by Code; • ? ORIGINAL h. A side (north) setback for structures other than buildings of 0', where 0'- 10' is required by Code; i. A rear (west) setback for structures other than buildings of 6' from seawall where 20' is required by Code; j. Minimum driveway spacing of 90' where 125' is required by Code; and k. Direct access to an arterial street, South Gulfview. RECEIVED ,11,1 11 2005 Section D. Written Submittal Requirements PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Applicability Criteria: CRVOF rtEAQWATFP 1) The proposed development of the land will be in: harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The property is bounded on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. North: The adjacent property to the north is the public beach and City-owned property which will be renovated with Beach Walk improvements. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project. East: The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller mixed uses, including retail and restaurants. It is anticipated that this area will also be undergoing renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. The proposed project consists of a 99'-10" tower and a 149'-6" tower, both lower than the existing Adam's Mark at 155'. The changes to the site will beautify and improve the property as viewed from the east. South: The adjacent property to south is occupied by 440 West condominiums, which are 157' in height and of similar or more massive scale than the proposed project. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with recently approved developments on Clearwater Beach, such as the Sunspree, a 149-unit condominium project located at 715 South Gulfview, which included approvals of transfers of density and 150' building height. The proposed project meets the Design Guidelines set forth in Section VII (C), Design, Scale and.Mass of Buildings of Beach by Design. Please refer to the detailed discussion of this criteria in the response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria No. 10, beginning on Page 10 of this exhibit. 2 3%&~111161 V 1 80 ORIGINAL. • JU 112005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discouragh"Ifu ap5P(?W1*'a'rFdR development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The property is currently occupied by the Adam's Mark, a 217-room hotel, 155' in height, constructed in 1974. The proposed project will improve current conditions on the property in a number of ways, including: (1) Superior architectural design, including tiered effect, and lush landscaping which will visually enhance the neighborhood; (2) Construction which meets current building Codes, as opposed to the existing building constructed over 30 years ago; (3) Excess parking, improved stacking space and elimination of traffic congestion; (4) Beach Walk improvements incorporated into the site provide for a better pedestrian flow along South Gulfview than what currently exists; (5) Property value will significantly increase. These improvements will in no manner be a hindrance but will serve to increase surrounding property values, improve safety and enhance the views of the site from adjacent parcels. The occupants of the proposed project, both permanent residents and hotel guests, will be potential clientele of nearby restaurants and other businesses. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The construction of the Beach Walk improvements, including 10' shell sidewalks, will improve the pedestrian flow and safety along South Gulfview and the north side of the property. Safety is also improved by minimizing traffic congestion as described in Criteria 4 below. Demolition of the existing hotel built in 1974 and the construction of structures built to current building Codes improve the safety of the building occupants and neighbors. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The applicant has provided information concerning the project to the City's Traffic Operations Division, which concurs that the proposed project does not generate any additional trip volumes and, therefore, does not require a Traffic Impact Analysis. There are a number of ways in which the project has been designed to minimize traffic congestion on South Gulfview Boulevard: (1) The entrance to the parking garage will have 40' of stacking space between the garage gate and the back of the sidewalk. This will allow adequate room for stacking of vehicles entering or exiting the garage so as not to interfere with traffic flow on South Gulfview. 3 0 ORIGINAL JUL 11 2005 (2) Excess parking is provided so there will not be looking for parking spaces. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER a back-up of vehicles (3) Two parking spaces have been designated as taxi spaces so that taxis will not have to stop on South Gulfview or look for space in the garage. (4) As shown on the proposed site plan, there is a loading space provided for moving vans and delivery trucks so they will not block traffic on South Gulfview. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The property is located within and at the northern end of the "Clearwater Pass District" of Clearwater Beach. The project will function as a southerly "bookend" to the "Beach Walk District." The project is also consistent with the community character of the "Clearwater Pass District" which Beach by Design describes as an area of mixed uses including high rise condos and resort hotels. As to the immediate vicinity, to the west is the Gulf of Mexico and the parcel to the north is the public beach and area being renovated by the City of Clearwater with Beach Walk improvements. The applicant is incorporating the Beach Walk improvements into the property and providing improvements in the City right-of- way as envisioned by Beach by Design, including 10' shell sidewalks and Medjool palms. The parcel to the south is occupied by the 157' condominium project, 440 West. This development was built in 1975 and has co-existed for 30 years with the existing 155' high Adam's Mark building. The proposed project which is of a superior architectural design to the Adam's Mark building and incorporates Beach by Design guidelines is an improvement of a nature that will enhance the 440 West property. To the east are mixed retail and overnight accommodation uses. This area is also expected to be affected and improved by Beach Walk. The proposed use as residential and condo-hotel with a small amount of retail is compatible with these mixed uses to the east. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal at this south end of the public beach. The architectural style integrates a "West Indies" design, which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property. 4 0 ORIGINAC The proposed uses as residential and condo-hotel are generally more passive than the current use as a 217-room resort hotel in terms of acoustic or olfactory impacts. The retail kiosks (FAR 0.04) will generally be open during daytime hours and are oriented to pedestrians on South Gulfview. The nature of this retail use is such as to not likely attract many customers at one time such that it would create any noise concerns. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board approved termination of non-conforming status to allow the renovation of the existing 217-room, 155' high hotel on the property, including a reduction in parking with certain conditions for landscaping and incorporation of Beach Walk improvements. This development order remains in effect. In June, 2005, the applicant purchased the property and desires to demolish the existing improvements and construct the proposed project which has been thoughtfully designed to comply with Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent possible. The proposed deviations, which are discussed in detail in Criteria 8 below, are necessary and minimal deviations to Code without which the project cannot be constructed at this location. The proposed redevelopment of this site which is highly visible from Beach Walk and is an integral part of the City's vision of Clearwater Beach as set forth in Beach by Design, should be preferable to the renovation of the property with the existing building as allowed per the current development order and as proposed by the previous owner. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The current assessed value of the property, per the Pinellas County tax rolls, is $16,100,000. The applicant estimates that the value of the property after the proposed redevelopment will be approximately $150,000,000. The value of surrounding properties will be increased by the redevelopment project. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and retail sales and services are all allowed uses in the "Tourist" zoning district. Such mixed uses are also contemplated as appropriate uses in the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. R EC"EVED JUL 11 2005 5 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • ORIGIUL 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. West: The property is bounded on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. North: The adjacent property to the north is the public beach and City-owned property which will be renovated with Beach Walk improvements. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project. East: The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller mixed uses, including retail and restaurants. It is anticipated that this area will also be undergoing renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. The proposed project, which is of a similar height to the existing Adam's Mark, will beautify and improve the site as viewed from the east. The property will be occupied by residents and hotel guests that may become clientele for nearby restaurants and other businesses. South: The adjacent property to south is occupied by 440 West condominiums, which are 157' in height and of similar or more massive scale than the proposed project. 440 West has adjoined the Adam's Mark hotel for its entire existence of 30 years. The proposed uses are compatible with the 440 West property because they are either (i) the same use as has existed on the site for 30 years (hotel); (ii) the same use as 440 West (residential) or (iii) minimal retail use (0.04 FAR) that the 440 West residents may wish to walk to. The extension of Beach Walk in front of the property will give 440 West residents easy pedestrian access to the north. Elimination of traffic congestion as previously described will improve traffic flow for 440 West residents. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. [This criteria was deleted by Code amendment.] 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. As shown by the proposed site plan and architectural and landscape plans, the proposed redevelopment will revitalize this location at the south end of the public beach. The installation of the Beach Walk improvements, plazas, fountains and retail uses on the ground floor of the project will improve the pedestrian access and enjoyment of this area of the beach. There are two fountains, one in front of the hotel and one in front of the retail kiosks. They are for pedestrian quality and identity. RD E EE %J E D 6 JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITV OF (71 FAQWATFO 0 011GINAL 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. As for the City of Clearwater as a whole, the project will greatly increase the property value, thereby increasing the City's tax base. The applicant has demonstrated the project's compliance with the guidelines of Beach by Design, which is in the best interest of the City. As for the community character of the immediate vicinity, the redevelopment of this property will create a beautiful and inviting view for Beach Walk pedestrians. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Termination of Non-conforming Status The applicant seeks termination of non-conforming status, in accordance with Section 6-109 of the Code, to allow the existing density of 217 hotel rooms (162 residential dwelling units) to remain on the site. Section 6-109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status as a non-conforming use or structure with the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202(D). This requirement is not applicable as all off-street parking will be enclosed in the building. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. The applicant agrees to accept a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code or be approved as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive ogr may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. ia EIVED JU 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT „r"0,0%. _.------ • #RIGINAL The proposed landscaping either meets or exceeds Code requirements. Height The request for additional height is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design which provides for increased height in the event of a transfer of development rights to the property. This request includes transfer of development rights applications to transfer 10 eligible residential dwelling units to the site from four other sites on Clearwater Beach. There is a reasonable relationship between the height increase for the condominium and the 10 transferred units based upon other cases recommended for approval by staff and actually approved by CDB consistent with Beach by Design. There are 30 proposed condominium units located above 100'. The request for additional height for the decorative cupolas, one of which will be located on the flat roof deck of each building, will allow architectural embellishment on the flat roof decks. The cupolas provide the West Indies character which is very important to the interesting and appealing island look. They also decrease the scale of the building by adding a detailed human scale element as in Beach by Design guidelines. Setbacks The relief sought from setbacks is with regard to setbacks to pavement or structures other than buildings and is required due to the incorporation of the Beach Walk improvements into the site, along the easterly and northerly boundaries. These setback deviations will not be visually apparent due to the incorporation of the Beach Walk improvements into the site. Relief from CCCL Setback The property is unique in that the CCCL wraps around the site and affects both the westerly and northerly boundaries. Although the structural setbacks are adequate and do not appear obtrusive, it is not possible to meet the 20' setback requirement for the entire site due to the angle at which the CCCL traverses the property. No part of any buildings or structures are located seaward of the CCCL. Relief from Minimum Driveway Spacing The garage meets all codes and standards of parking garage circulation. It is different from parking lot. Although it is not possible to make turns without encroaching on the opposing lane, the parking garage is designed similar to other existing installations in the City. We will recommend th 1 to ation of mirrors to allow drivers to spot oncoming traffic. s JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPgRTME T • RECEWED OORIGINr1L II1L 11 t005 Access to an Arterial PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The property is addressed from South Gulfview and the Adam's Mark hotel has always had direct access from South Gulfview. The proposed access drive location has been modified slightly in connection with the redevelopment of the site but is in substantially the same location as access has existed for 30 years. There is no other viable access. The applicant has eliminated original plans for additional access on the north side of the property in order to eliminate any congestion with the beach parking lot and in order to make the north side of the site more of a plaza, enhanced with walkways and landscaping to invite pedestrians to the property. In connection with the applicant's request for transfers of density to the property, the following are responses to the TDR criteria of Section 4-1403.A. 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Please see the detailed discussion of how the project will improve abutting properties in response to General Applicability Criteria 2. 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Residential, overnight accommodations and retail uses are permitted in the City. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Please see the detailed discussion of the how the project is compatible with adjacent land uses in the response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Criteria 4. 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Please see the detailed discussion of how the project will improve abutting properties in response to General Applicability Criteria 2. Again, this site is at the south end of Beach Walk and as such, the beautification of this site through the proposed redevelopment project will have an immense favorable impact on Beach Walk, both visually and by providing an inviting pedestrian connection to the property. 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9 K&%10L;1 v &;Lo 0 ,ll:11 11 2005 ORIGINAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Please see the response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria 7. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. As shown on the proposed site plan, the project provides excess parking. The applicant proposes 274 off-street parking spaces, where 263 spaces are required by Code. All off-street parking is located within the buildings and vehicular circulation through the development affords an ease of movement for pedestrians and vehicles. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). The proposed project has been designed in accordance with Beach by Design design guidelines. We provide the following information concerning the height, mass and bulk criteria. Mass Concept A. Breeze Court concepts provide negative mass space between structures enhanced by courtyard activity and landscaping. This breeze way focus is southwest for light and ventilation and gives openness to the plan. It is also enhanced by water features, some seen from South Gulfview. B. The north building has a prominent place at the edge of the beach. The West Indies roofs step toward the Gulf and begin at 11' above grade, a very comfortable human scale dimension. It makes several steps to the peak with a symmetric cap roof and cupola. C. The pedestrian friendly retail kiosk area is very important not only for its interest gathering use but also by the fact that it forms a human scale courtyard that is the entry, face, edge of the interface between the Beach Walk extension and the building. Mass/Bulk Review 1. The face (Gulfview) is in a horizontal plane ratio of 27% on the residences and 36.3% on the Hotel. This "thinness" is accented by window rhythm and lighter color. 2. All parking is concealed and the fagade is articulated in the building theme along with several human scale arches. 3. The building shape and orientation correlate to the public park aspect of the south end of Beach Walk. 4. At least 68% of the facades are covered with architectural accents, windows or decorative railings. 10 • o?ieiNaL 5. The equal length consideration is solved by varied height and length; most vary at 40' and one at 65' (requirement 100' max). Not only does the wall vary but usually terminates at a point of interest or at a visual invitation (to see around a balcony or in a courtyard). The juxtaposition of the 2 masses greatly lessens bulk. 6. The maximum building envelope above 45' (max. allowed 60%) is 58% reducing to 26% at the peaks, significantly less mass. 7. All setbacks for structure are 15' or 20' on water. 8. The human scale and aesthetic appeal of street level facades and the relationship to Beach Walk was a hallmark of the design concept. It is further enhanced by landscaping and fountains. Tower Separation 1. The project consists of 2 towers, one at 99'-10" high and one at 149'-6" high measured from FEMA. For the 149'-6" portion of the building: a. TDR's are included. b. No portion of the building structure above 100' is within 100' of any other structure exceeding 100' in height. C. For structures within 500' to the southeast, we are separated by 186' (100' allowable). Therefore, there are not more than two buildings exceeding 100' in height within 500' of each other. d. For structures within 800', we include 4 portions of buildings (2' existing and one approved D.O.). Attached "Diagram 800 - Option 2" shows the 800' alignment indicating our structure does not exceed the allowable 40%. e. The floor plates over 45' do exceed the guidelines in 3.a and 3.b, and deviations are requested pursuant to 3.c as we have a significant tiered effect in the structure vertically and horizontally. In addition the courtyard effect and a setback more than 3 times the required mitigates the floor plate effect. Additionally, the overall telescoping shape, "L" shape and sidewall articulation mitigates the floor plate area. All portions of the structure are well within the maximum allowable envelope. 7/11/2005 11:35 AM 45934.109561 #346200 v2 - TW Acq/Ex to Comp Infill App RECEIVED JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT COY OF CLEARWATER 11 STRUCTURE AREA = 15,966 SF (39%) ALLOWABLE 16,00 SF (40%) EHfiR£ PL.ANIr mlov9 too' = 40,0-05r- 432 SF l 1 - .-j . 99F _._. 0228 SP r t57io8' T U l03' x 130' u , 800' --» -4 -t loo' I 1 I opwti 2 59 V ;0 m -n Oz = 0 'low ? m 0 cx? ? Z 4591 SF 0 AML C ? w '? am... w r _ C lie f \ d ORIGINAI BLDG. PROFILE/GLASS-DETAIL RATIO RECEIVED EAST ELEVATION JUL. 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 70 he ... 0 3 1 gl? r , slim I r ?r? I 1 IL 1 Ilk fir- r r ?. C • ?7 G) 7- 4 • BLDG. PROFILE/GLASS-DETAIL RATIO NORTH ELEVATION ? Mz MM PO ?a a ?m z C- g m n m m O C 0 ,e ?f BLDG. PROFILE/GLASS-DETAIL RATIO SOUTH ELEVATION 10 ?z m 0? _ _ 0 R ° m ?-A m CD ?' n .. c_ • L1 0 'a 0z m 0 00 ?a BLDG. PROFILE/GLASS-DETAIL RATIO Z C= WEST ELEVATION '4 V CD 1-0 0 b w Z O U I TUTO 3`3tld • ORIGINAL e? `??? r'w?Pt`ao '1t1Ri1.1 .Rt? .1.?l3?Noa s I -V ..13-n:sl * RECEVED J UL 11 2005 -STt7? Sr ;VF If t0k?:..'S?'.:yka PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLFADWAIrD W,W 64' fi1NNING DEPARTMENT CITE' OF CLEARWATER . ,, ?a . # 6 TW/BEACH RESIDENCES - CLEARWATER, L.L.C. RECEIVED FLD2005-05047 ?.r15 MASK j Hl- 11 1005 Building Mate rials/Textu res/Color PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Color: The building fagade has 3 colors decreasing in tone as they progress vertically, separated by banding. Area 1 Base Cottage Cream SW 2347 Area 2 Middle Aged Ivory SW 2450 Area 3 Top & Penthouses Edelweiss SW 2446 ORIGINAL Further, thin group elements symmetrically in the front of each fagade (about 38' - 45' width depending on fagade), goes vertically accenting each fagade and reducing mass of that fagade. Area 4 Area 5 Area 6 Area 7 Area 8 Area 9 Accents at Hotel Lobby and Kiosk Area 10 All Banding, Moldings Thin Fagade Coconut Grove White SW 2428 Roof Elements Blue/green slate or slate type product, copper-look flashings, cupola accent detail Railings Clear glass rails, aluminum cap-white West Indies picket & cross, wrought iron color Door/Window Frames Teak wood color Shutters/Louvers Sea Moss SW 2366 Florida cut limestone natural veneer Egret White SW 2004 Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ndni G iates AADT GROUP o,ae wrno Anhircct • Planning 5.-.,i*nE,oa•lamaa 1543101 S-d S¢ t Suaeoti4 Ploddv 34276 941-957-4477 941'-9574151 Pan dd&W-dt- • O x 03 cC TJ I CV a V 5 'o a; v v r? ¦ ns. eoooma ao r...uien or u oo® ai ? r uiriiroa cesr wrn r. ro?ssa a rxe ?r?n? ism wour? a?0"ceaeaaoe wrn rme.u earrwxr DATE: MAY 25, 2005 © Coa9rlot 2005 - SHEET NUMBER. COVER m F- N N Ci) CD Ul m Al Ir og ;o ,::? z L m o 0 00 m mv a - N A O O cr M 1 -LV -V a A N i A LO s9o[ alz9 Cid4ett Ul A1DT 0102FP .....s.. ' ? Arr? ]aae. Sanylla?d. ]®fi ? Wa gotlisy4in 4-1 a F x 79 ID 0 ¦ L -? D lop 6511- m .111 WAS m N A1.01 10 0 00 nm r7? ? Z Q 4 L E-A h-A 4 ICU f L IB I NCA AREA T,45UL AT I ON-5 SPACES UNITS ENCLOSED BLDG TERRACE AREA (S1=) GROSS AREA (SF) CONDO TOWER A : PARIGINCs LEVEL I 0 0 59,612 0 PARKING LEVEL 2 Sb 10 57,512 2,300 PARKING LEVEL 3 88 11 5'1,512 2,300 AMENMY LEVEL 4 7 28)014 21,252 TYPICAL LEVELS 5-10 54 2S?ff14 X 6 =168,444 1,"180 X 6 = 10,680 TYPICAL LEVEL 11 8 24,623 - 1,411 TYPICAL LEVELS 12-13 {? 2,104 DIPLOMAT LEVELS 14-8 16 9'14 X 2 = 33 948 110 X 2 = HOTEL TOMR B PARKING LEVEL 1 9°I 0 INCLUDED ABOVE 0 PARKING LEVEL 2 0 0 INCLUDED ABOVE 0 PARKING LEVEL 3 0 0 INCLUDED ABOVE 0 TYPICAL LEVEL 4 1 10,456 INCLUDED ABOVE IrryTA! Mill 1 ?I?11I??,II']I=t l'rI?I INSTA. 112 LNITA TOTAL OUILDING OVEWIGHT UNITS : 78 UNITS TOTAL ENCLOSED BUILDI NG AREA: 541,363 TOTAL TERRACE BUILDING AIWA: 42,413 HOTEL PARKING: 93 5PAGES (NCL.UONG 2 TAXI, 4 WC) 78 UNITS X 1 = -18 REQUIRED CONDO PARKW-:r. 174 SPACES (INCLUDING 6 I4C) 112 UNITS X 1.5 = 165 IREGUI'RED m N CD CD Ln m co M LD UI F? 40 CD I;o H m D 0 • D m W m J N F.a N' m CD Ut z 0 0 z 11! l.-L O FLORIDA BUILDING CODE= 2001 EDITION INCLUDING TI-4E FLORIDA ACCESSISILITr CODE NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE, 2000 EDITION PRIMARY CHAPTER 30 NEIU APT BLDG OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, MSIDENTIAL HIGWRISE/+4OTEL HIGIHRISE ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA Ba41363 TERRACE AREA 42,413 TOTAL BUILDIWs AMA 583,rt?fo SF. OCCUPANT LOAD : APT PORTIONS - 200 S F PER PERSON, GROSS . ELEVATION 1ST FLOOR: ELEV. fold' N,GVD FLOOD ZONE: (VE) ELEV. 1&.01 BUILDWG 1-EIGHT: 14'W-6" ABOVE SASE FLOOD ELEV. -® PLUS 16'-0" 0VEtR RLIN FOR ELEVATOWIECI4 Wl T IA TURIT LOOK Z ' - I ? ? MAX. BUILDING, WT 13Y CODE. 150 ABOVE EASE FLOOD ELEV. 05 1 T T"= (.Jr L..4^ZV I K A.; ii IC^.- I T f"'t 11 m ALLOWABLE FLOOR LOAD: SEE STRILCTI RAL PLANS 02 C 0 DESIGN WND LOADS: DETEi INED BY THE PROVISIONS OF ASCE 1 ()0 r (1606.1.1 FBG) D m m FI,ILLr FIFE SFR NKLERED BLDG. PER 5CCN=PA101 1!30-331 C FULLY FIRE ALARM PROTECTED BLDG. PER SGCINFP?A101 (30-34) ,? m Z O UNIT EXIT ACCESS: TWO REMOTE EXIT STAIR TOWERS ARE SMOKEPROOF TORS OFF A 1 HR FIRE RATED EGRESS CORRIDOR PER FBC 10058 CS1 co A CTI LD A I- lD U1 J A r H r m D Ln 0 0 D m CD A ML ?y'1?Ctt ?A30dptLS ARDT? OYO Un 6°?mmm'Tlmol^6 JS4&M?ei 9' ._ snt[c CD N 6! CD 0 CD co A lD N l0 CJl ^.1 .A r cn N C) n tlQ.RI Y! ? fd c.n r. t.? A2.a1 CD :o Gillatt Associ?sa ARDT OROII2 ao.ei?e 6ed?mu.P?1? 1567013rao?3ue?! 3mr+wlhuda 34216 941ni t7-fQ7 9/L.ATFJiL 1'¢ O y -? c.n ?z IKIII? E a M V nm v. A2.02 CD C N CTI .?.o C9 A o. O'1 rxu3.a. Gf'Uett A?eociatea AR DT aRo 1 236111 Semd9ee lewrl?ata 3iila 3i1A37?L11 [ia lD A F-' lD Ul A 0 fi 1 H r r m LO U) 0 0 1C 0 - T7 Z i'- 0 m GgTI m4 mm A 2m r A2.03 m CD N N 0D m Ul 03 ?y 01 t 4, t 1 1 G1?LttAaaociabm ARD? 680U?P L)l ?J 9424W4Ui M.. 1 P -j -UN irr or D - ?,- P4 E L- -J 0 - I r? w r + w A r ' A ? r l 1 ' if 1 6" '_=--- A2.04 LJ7 m >i i LAJ D p 3 W ' M > I I LL-1 I r f f m? !rn "M 113 ® r t" J J s r 0 x _ GI n Gt?G?t Al600SCC8 91[?1S7iA7 ¦ t.oo. E-M WW, r4r A2.Q5 m N na m m m co A m LD A N LO a ^.J A 0 LJ H r m U] U7 0 C) b m m Lo m N CS) Ul 1 mmmmmmm? L9 CC) l A 1 lD CsillettAasDaatrs Ul k a t k co k 1 i ? ° D i " • LL ull ? r - `? 1 J1 1 11 1 - E? II n .Z7 a 1 ? f _ O ? f ? ? - il_fet -?_ D TYP LEVE. n ??,.. VIP, m 1/811 n .--_ A2.06 Mm y ® _ ?I fl P9 3 LLI H LOO 0 5 tG 5, z Z e Y O c J?? G) i TIM .? ?- C j m? I i 1 0 0 w w w.. f 23 w- r7 t -OFF . ?cl --13 ter Dv ?? 1!8" w Y 8 w? m N . m m Ln m co A m LO A N C lD ift.t?.9eOClgpeB Ay Di DRo Ash2ewner 7?a.?.ffd.Id? ? id?7BJ laorid9?ut M m W cn m A2.07 CS) N CS) CD LT1 m co A cn ym m ?-? vnawmw 9= 0 1I8''t a G?7ictt Aeaoclat?s ABDT OROL'P 9?apa, PL?i73o '3? y9lL?57?47) LD F-e tD Ul .A ?til ?r? y S H r r m Lr) cr) 0 0 9 ?... m AR N rye ? wig N A2.08 m N CD CD Lyl m 00 A Q1 n§ OZ - 00 ?- Mm rn/ ?z O ? CS.? ?l >! w? J, ::I? M.. W ii J J i 0 0 ones: 1060, MH NUB 118 ja Csilleti ABSaagtra ARDT 6YODP q? 3 NOWN V J to 'i A2.08 lD A LD U1 -lj A N is H r m D 0 n 9 b m w n O m m C e m m TYP LELB 5-1® 1/1011 7-- Gillett Associates A RDA GROUP Axhlextute • PSamf? 9mm.Ll.mi.lcndm 1543101 od& 4236 949.957-4177 7 941-957.4151 Fa dd&Rcmud[.aom o 4n og ¦ ?Q Ii11! 5-10 A2.10 0 Gillett Associates ARDi.G ROUp Aac6inectu[e • Pkadvg s.d.e..m.?.1? 1543-101 l 4mn Sw-d d& S34236 S o on 7 941-9574151 F- V ;0 M n z s-- 0 V I 0 M °g bloom A7 A M m ? Z CD rrn LEYELS 5-11 m NUUMb 1/10" A pa? W j N x e o.ww.eo. SOIL. P . ,M.O• "r arms au rarer A2.11 • rml- GilAssociates ARDT GROUP IMCO1f O?wT?D Acrhimemm PLenmg 5-•Afi.9 [mdm 1541101 S...d.Stet S.-M FOU& 74236 941-9S7-4477 941.9574151 Fu 1) '0 f¦zr 0 >? CD fill 14EbIDENCEb BLDG. MATERIALS LEGEND: . N DI 'f e r ? '- 4 4 i B 1 & EAST (FRONT) ELEVATION U ^ e .t? M Bp D . fi rID N IO r M LOW p N M.afiCI11YMITlim1 M tlp M•6q Dwri tY RPewr1 . i? t! r M O?EIk1ta MII Mya or ffiP11 dC®li& Mruwq~, ? T?•4NIIID>IMID1w?4rMYaT?16MY01 ra.vM11DIDMMwR?WA WraYI1?TNp M.iINIOEMIIIW?101?IO?OfIR ' ?MR4 C?DDr?I ? ?ra.pmar?noa??raMn?nMawre? . ra. fi wweltiDD1111turD?t,Aq Da.fawnwwrlAlr?earana?ur •oAr?warue? iiiaws 1Ol DYI?11 M.tiOMMpp?tN . M.p?Dy M/MIIA{l4LL?! M. Accoo NYNI1raWO'iftel IF M.YiOti1.r11M111 riR?1/??yp11?1?1 M.Il?faf ?fp?pr0ll DNIIM 1Ft. omI0wA~y &"pp-D? ' Ra'pmrDIR4YMIrOdRrAMDeY ' M.pmW4?f?lr?D?VAYWllr1?(1mm1 . .- - _ ----- 6? _^- f I 1' W ]f IY Y r ?T 1/20 v -ooopo11.....,.M I ?y a o ? iQh CQ ` i? awrn is a MAY 2S 3006 ® Copyright 2006 SCALE: 1'.20'-W EA9T (FRONT) 11"A"ON SHEET NUMBER: A3.01 nni Gillett Associau ARDT GROUP coa.oawrec A..a.M........ PLmin: s.aw•ta®•Lmdm' IS43-101 5.cmd S- Saeloq Flo - 3423( 941.M-4477 941.957.4151 F. ?J ? M F?a y v CD F101E1 ??"' BLDG: MATERIALS LEGEND: mi. 5F. a2Z WEST ELEVATION wJ • ONaYw11.111M11.! w1.lcaew wo?anwuw. MnY 7WM / Af19R& aw1w. ?? M • M11.1t 1ar0MIHwIN:lOAtO.iM/M W11F lIIIwW M.aMROr11M 0111i)A.1 OYOl1.r u.ew.www:a1?10w.a.atu?l.Y1w 0Y1?) •rwra vo111m T4 ==man ?w'Cw.011wwM1"= M.Oti0110w11?1TM?101110MICMMT Tti.C?M1Yw11?I0M10w00Mw...M.F..E.D BOAT w11R1l? ?ciawON1? .4s.011w.a.6Ar 1{l lwlll GA14FZpFAllB /WMJORdIL6 ew.rwawwtww wonlcr.lr cwwr ..wIR111L wnm 1M . O.iM.K AYM1(?.®1 wwar a! w1.O.001WMU11w11aacaca.i ?i.A1D®dYW1.1T.?I?w1O1LalAI M. ®1111/,4 fIYY?MwMLM11111!\!Mp®) w' • f s• N' K .O 1 /20 a.r ? V r.-a L V d A ? rn ? s aa11.1r11M. wv r w.• wm ? aw. a 1w. w (rr nw. ¦aa.r was r1w 1ww?d, a. n aw.lalr r rr aw.r ? ro w1a tr awss raasr . weellwraa ? (en. ar1.. ua DATE: MAY 25, 370E oQ CoDYNONt 2005 SCALE: 1- .20-0' REST ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER: A3.02 I nmmmmmmmmmnmmw - "f BLDG. MATERIALS LEGEND: ?:.? ?gTAr.? r1. L1M?YY1IWI61/IOY?YI[Y1LlTCYM®?1 NORTH ELEVATION M•QT?f6Hi11?111Y1Yp/ 1 M•NTYYRIY RV /ItIM f1 ? ? r 1RP11 ACYBM, rrrr?r ?r? ? l sM1f - V Y FI.L/MIIOIM101RfiAWM WTAlOWi1 ?? ? M QMIWMI 0 ? Td. gCgYfA WCI?Yr'?IIYW Ir11Mlp! r . MIYDIO?Or O1RT M.rOfrIW11?111W1?1e.?rY0I1fT ?-.d 9 0 ?? ..ernnaYrre,?amaY?wsrl?so •??? roa rwaruv M.OYOrJOl•IYIYI TAW l?mYp1 2* M . AGt MIln?.plprl OYMM umomm M•Im®AYM?YEML?1f?1 M•?ImY?MYM111TM.?lIY?lYO1LNA1 Kl•6b11iM AtYWI4?Ym1MRMr M•pYiplYM AtinrI YrJTI1toYlDYiY M•OraMiMG?M1.?YrrA11W11M\IIINOmI '?.?, ?-%?"s? GRAhC SCALE; SCALE IN rm, - f •_Ar ,r 1/20 MI. Gillett Associa ARDT GROU Ardutaaue• Phan: 1513101 S -d 5¢. Su.aq Pladd. 3422 941-957.4477 941.957.4151 F. ddadxooa. 4d a o 4 -v 4?T MM M lOlYlr4 r ?: ?m wssr? ?eae?ws YYI Yrrrl oa:n DATE. ANY ZA 40M © Cooyri oM 4006 SCALE: 1'.20'.0' NORTH ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER: A3.03 Mil . Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP A..d.«....... aster •Mrsi •• Iadm 1543.101 se..w S. Sme 4.FWA& 34236 937-4477 941.957-4151 P. M m 0(i) ,... 0 ~x m m ?--? cw-l 11OM CD B LDG MATERIALS LEGEND: rmi' u rra rr g SOUTH ELEVATION Y..I..r.r a.l&ANM w .aurrwaumne.r M . (rsnrav..roveM.arrrL N • eaERU? ral.a.frlee.r 7FO'I dC.C81iBr rrasr?au - ° t?.arrenrrnr anamr.rawwlrn?se( rw . nw.n M.ofmmwwlrweo?wwerwMr t-1. aIMIR...rOrR0.0M?lw.Iwawe.! iJ.o.crruAr.wao?rro.a.sra.(nr.ia IlIr4 Glawap wa.alsn.rF.rSYS+a.?a. or.r M. as..W le.l Mlcial.M w 11F.ad1 I..I rN1? 1Y G .O? SWIpI GAAFMAHA M. er0u111rMGN na.1. M.[irl.M rrall.rLr.1DS) M.IIrtJellteai. MDei.1\O.IIY ?0'?=-y„_ ?ea?9 N.ADD®AIYN11.Mrltll r?.1 F7.Ore#.M/IYMIlAEOi/M1PW ? N•aaAl AWMIIrv?. r.1. rMpr.L la.l M.ar7ylM aIMIp.1RGamad ?? M•LSaY1M GYM Mr. nawrnweum?r c.pt4rw 5CALE. SCAL . + e • r' x' r 1r r=?=r 1 /20 ?? oow2n ? .?aaa... ? C C S, r O o <s g x -3 O ¦ ?Mr M..srr .. .m . ass M a? . asr .. 1M l.re r ni .Il.ereOT ur Y? a..t . e? tae rM r.srtM rest . GseeaAw ?rrr r+r eerMrrr GATE: MAY 24 3705 Qo CoaYri"t 2005 SCALE: 1' .20'-0• So= zl"IL 10N SHEET NUMBER, A3.04 wamelcEs • 0 Adams Mark Hotel RedeveloDment Existing Tree Inventory Summary & Plan City of Clearwater Pinellas County, Florida ORIGINAL Prepared for: TW ACQUISITIONS, Inc. 877 Executive Center Drive W. Suite 205 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 July 2005 RECEIVED JUL 11 2005 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS; ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd New Port Richey, FL 34655 PLANNING D? WA ERT CITY OF CL 1 ?Iloy EXISTING TREE INVENTORY SUMMARY Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment General Note: Site consisted of a hotel on Clearwater Beach, that was currently closed to the public. The site was primarily composed of sabal palms, with single species of 3 other palm types. The palms had varying degrees of past damage to the trunks and distortions of the trunk do to growing conditions. The general condition of the crowns varied from some that were full to others with only several fronds per palm. There were also 11 Holly trees in varing conditions, ranging from dead to fair. • n. r=3 MECEVED Field Date: 5/9/05, 7/8/05 Prepared by: Patrick Roberson, RLA, ISA Certified Arborist # - FL1051A JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 82 Palm trees & 11 Hollies reviewed, on or adjacent to site. Tree # Type General Condition Canopy Diameter Form / Character Notes 1 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics 2 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 10' Nospecial / uni ue characteristics 3 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' Nospecial / unique characteristics 4 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' Nos ecial /uni ue characteristics 5 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' No s ecial / unique characteristics 6 Saba] Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' No special / unique characteristics 7 Saba] Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' No special / unique characteristics 8 Saba] Palm - Saba] palmetto Fair 10' Nos ecial /uni ue characteristics 9 Queen Palm - S a rus romanzoffana Poor 1/2 10' No special / unique characteristics 10 Sabal Palm - Saba] palmetto Fair 10' Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics 11 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 10' Nospecial / unique characteristics 12 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 101. Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics Off-site 13 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 10' Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics 14 Cana Island Date - Phoenix canariensis Good 18' Potential transplant, browning frond tips Needs fertilizer, care 15 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 12' No special / unique characteristics 16 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 12' No s ecial / uni ue characteristics 17 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 10' Nos ecial /uni ue characteristics 18 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Decline 10' No special / unique characteristics 19 Saba] Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 10' No special / unique characteristics 20 Saba] Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 8' No special / unique characteristics 21 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics 22 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 12' Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics 23 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 12' No special / unique characteristics 24 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 8' Nos ecial /uni ue characteristics 25 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 14' Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics 26 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics 27 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 14' No special / unique characteristics 28 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 10' Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics 29 Sene al Date - Phoenix reclinata Fair-poor 15'x 8' Multi-trunk, 3 major, 3 minor Few fronds at crown, need care 30 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Poor 10' No special / unique characteristics noiiniaL K:\209\ProjData\Landscape\ConstDocs\Exhibits\TreeS ummary-AdamsMark.xls ORIGINAL Tree # Type General Condition Canopy Diameter Form / Character Notes 31 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 14' No special / unique characteristics 32 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 14' No special / unique characteristics 33 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 14' No s ecial / unique characteristics 34 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 14' No s ecial / uni ue characteristics 35 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 14' No special / unique characteristics 36 Sabal Palm - Saba[ palmetto Poor 10' Nos ecial /uni ue characteristics 37 Sabal Palm - Saba[ palmetto Fair-poor 11' Nospecial / unique characteristics 38 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair-poor 11' No special / unique characteristics 39 Saba] Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair-poor 11' No special / unique characteristics ?j tl 40 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 12' No s ecial / unique characteristics DE 41 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good-fair 8' Nospecial / unique characteristics MMMEP 'TY OF (%XEARW/ 42 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 14' No special / unique characteristics qER 43 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 14' Nospecial / unique characteristics 44 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 12' Nospecial / unique characteristics 45 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good-fair 10' No special / unique characteristics Off-site 46 Sabal Palm - Saba] palmetto Good-fair 10' No special / unique characteristics Off-site 47 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Poor 10' No special / unique characteristics Off-site 48 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair-poor 12' No special / unique characteristics Off-site 49 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' No special / unique characteristics Off-site 50 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 8' Nospecial / unique characteristics Off-site 51 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' No special / unique characteristics Off-site 52 Saba] Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 8' No special / uni ue characteristics Off-site 53 Saba] Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 8' No special / uni ue characteristics Off-site 54 Saba] Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 8' No special / unique characteristics Off-site 55 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 6' No special / unique characteristics 56 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 12' No special / unique characteristics 57 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 12' Nospecial / unique characteristics 58 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 12' Nospecial / unique characteristics 59 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' No s ecia) /uni ue characteristics Off-site 60 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 8' No special / unique characteristics Off-site 61 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' No special / unique characteristics Off-site 62 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' No special / unique characteristics Off-site 63 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 12' No s ecial / unique characteristics 64 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 8' No special / unique characteristics 65 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' Nospecial / unique characteristics 66 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' Nospecial / unique characteristics Off-site 67 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' Nospecial/ unique characteristics J K:\209\Proj Data\Landscape\ConstDocs\Exhibits\TreeSummary-AdamsMark.xls ORIGINAL Tree # Type General Condition Canopy Diameter Form / Character Notes 68 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics Off-site 69 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 10' No special / unique characteristics Off-site 70 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Decline 10' No special / unique characteristics 71 Saba] Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 14' No s ecial / uni ue characteristics 72 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 14' No special / unique characteristics 73 Senegal Date - Phoenix rec]inata Fair 12' Sin le trunk with lean to south 74 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 12' No special / unique characteristics 75 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair 10' Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics 76 Saba] Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 12' Nospecial / unique characteristics 77 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Poor 6' Nospecial / unique characteristics Off-site 78 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Fair-poor 10' Nospecial / unique characteristics 79 Sabal Palm - Saba[ palmetto Fair 8' Nospecial / unique characteristics 80 Saba[ Palm - Sabal palmetto Decline 8' Nos ecia) /uni ue characteristics 81 Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto Good 12' Nospecial / unique characteristics Off-site 82 Cana Island Date - Phoenix canariensis Good 18' Browning frond tips Off-site 83 Holly - Ilex attenuata 'East Palatka' Fair 3' 3" DBH, fair structure 84 Holly - Ilex attenuata 'East Palatka' Decline 4' Damage to upper central leader 85 Holly - Ilex attenuata 'East Palatka' Fair 4' Fair structure, no unique characteristics 86 Holly - Ilex attenuata 'East Palatka' Fair-Poor 4' Uneven taper and bend in trunk 87 Holly - Ilex attenuata'East Palatka' Poor 4' Poor general structure 88 Holly - Ilex attenuata'East Palatka' Dead Entire tree dead 89 Holly - Ilex attenuata'East Palatka' Dead Entire tree dead 90 Holly - Ilex attenuata 'East Palatka' Dead Entire tree dead 91 Holly - Ilex attenuata'East Palatka' Poor 4' Poor general structure 92 Holly - Ilex attenuata'East Palatka' Decline 4' Dead wood in upper 1/3 of trunk 93 Holly - Ilex attenuata 'East Palatka' Decline 3' Damage to upper central leader MID ECE?VED JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER K:\209\Proj Data\Landscape\ConstDocs\Exhibits\TreeSummary-AdamsMark.xls I#: 2005218053 BK: 14361 0 2540, 06/06/2005 at 05:19 PM, RECORDING 4 PAGES $35.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $220500.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMCI This Instrument Was Prep ared.By Judd L. Leach, Esq. Jones Day 2727 N. Harwood Dallas, Texas 75201 LandAmerica._=,BrO,tte Sawicki 1302 N. 19`h`Street, Suite 200 Tampa, FL.:3360 File # `T=GtS9 (o rty Appraiser Grantee's Tax fication No. Identification No. 7291$523800000330 20-0470510 II % SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED ORiGINAL MSPA ACQUISITION II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Grantor"), for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration paid to Grantor by TWBEACH RESIDENCES-CLEARWATER, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company ("Grantee"), whose current address is 877 Executive Center Drive, Suite 205, St. Petersburg, Florida 33702, has GRANTED, SOLD AND CONVEYED, and by these presents does hereby GRANT, SELL AND CONVEY unto Grantee, all of that certain real property situated in Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, together with all buildings, improvements, structures and fixtures located thereon, and all rights, ways, privileges and appurtenances pertaining thereto (collectively, the "Proert '). SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to each of the matters set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Permitted Exceptions"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property, subject to the aforesaid Permitted Exceptions, unto Grantee, Grantee's successors and assigns, forever; and Grantor does hereby bind Grantor and Grantor's successors to WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND all and singular the Property, subject to the aforesaid Permitted Exceptions, unto Grantee, Grantee's successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof, by, through or under Grantor, but not otherwise. RE"CEVED _#Z, L 11 X015 DLI-5919894v2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REK 14361 PG 2541 ORIGINAL EXECUTED;fo.be ;effective as of 3 , 2005. SIGNED, SEALED AND'DELIVERED IN MSPA ACQUISITION II, L.P., a Delaware THE PRESENCE OF: limited partnership Witness By: MSPA Acquisition II GP, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, its general partner By: Name: Title: STATE OF ss. '''-COUNTY OF ? c?IV This instrument was acknowledged before me on JIiYVP ?, 2005 by r'{-Vcthe Lf;c-C: re?,APNf-of MSPA ACQUISITION II GP, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, the general partner of MSPA ACQUISITION II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, on behalf of said limited partnership. [SEAL] 30Y A. GAL AGHER Kouny Public, State of New Yak No.01GA6011773 Not y ublic, State of Qualified in LJlater county wed in Nov Yak County Qaaa ftk a A pW 17. jT' 6 L y commission expires: le, (4 64 17, JwL RECEIVED '.. 11ZVI PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWA,TER DLI-5919894v2 2 (Type/Print Name.,of Witness) PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REAK 14361 PG 2542 ORIGINAL EXHIBIT A %'.ti.• Legal Description A tract of land consisting of Lots 33, 34 and 35 and part of Lot 36 of LLOYD-WHITE- SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13, pages 12 and 13 of-thd-Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida and lands and submerged lands lying betwee?:'arid'southerly, southwesterly or westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkhead Line'described in and set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Flori '0-1 isclaimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official Records Book 765, Page 542 of the Public Records-if Pinellas County, Florida, said tract being described as follows: From theNorthern most corner of said Lot 33, run South 77° 41' 16" West, along the Northwesterly boundary of said Lot 33 and the Southwesterly extension thereof, a distance of 400.0. feetAb-.a point on the Bulkhead Line described above; run thence Southeasterly along said Bulkh&dd Line along a curve to the left (radius - 1247.0 feet) an arc distance of 296.79 feet (chord?,,.269.09 feet, chord bearing - South 19° 07' 51" East); run thence North 68° 55' 27" East a'distance of 402.14 feet to a point on the Northeasterly boundary of said Lot 36; run thence &brthwesterly along the Northeasterly boundaries of said Lots 36, 35, 34 and 33, which line is a Qurve to the right (radius - 847.0 feet) an are distance of 235.76 feet (chord - 235.0 feet, chord hearing - North 20° 17' 10" West) to the Point of Beginning. RECEIVED R?4 °R 1005 DL1-5919894v2 A-1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OF CLE4RWATER PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REAK 14361 PG 2543 ORIGINAL EXHIBIT B Permitted Exceptions 1. Taxes and assessrrients'for the year 2005 and subsequent years. 2. Rights, if any-,<6f:the State of Florida based on the doctrine of the state's sovereign ownership, of''lands lying below the mean high water line of any navigable or tidally 3. Rights;., if.any, of the public to use as a public beach or recreation area any part of the land lying'betwden the body of water abutting the Property and the natural line of vegetation, bluff,, extreme high water line, or other apparent boundary line separating the publicly used:area from the upland private area. 4. Rii arty interests of Coastal Petroleum Company, its successors and assigns, pursuant to :;agieements with the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida as to 'that portion of the land lying beneath the waters of Gulf of Mexico or other adjacent '`.waters, which interests do not include right of surface or subsurface entry or rights to mine, drill or otherwise obtain access to minerals beneath the surface of the land. 5 Easement(s) in favor of City of Clearwater set forth in instrument(s) recorded in Official Records Book 4074, Page 1438. 6. Easement(s) in favor of Florida Power Corporation set forth in instrument(s) recorded in Official Records Book 4191, Page 1249. Easement(s) in favor of City of Clearwater set forth in instrument(s) recorded in Official Records Book 5141, Page 395. The rights, if any, of Coastal Petroleum Company, its successors and assigns, to all oil, gas and sulphur and other minerals in, on or under the Property as provided in that certain Quit Claim Deed executed by Coastal Petroleum Company to and in favor of Bass Construction Company dated July 11, 1972 and recorded on September 6, 1972, in Official Records Book 3871, page 569 of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, which is referenced in that certain Warranty Deed executed by Clearwater Beach Hotel, Inc. and Mortgage Investors of Washington, as Grantors, to and in favor of HBE-Florida Corporation, as Grantee, dated August 31, 1977 and recorded August 31, 1977 in Official Records Book 4591, page 1704. RECEIVED DLI-5919894v2 B-1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CffyOF CCEARW4-TE0 • • ORIGINAL FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. MAY 2 6 2005 f 1 r • Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment Master Drainage Report City of Clearwater Pinellas County, FLORIDA Prepared for: TW ACQUISITIONS, Inc. ' 877 Executive Center Drive W. Suite 205 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 May 2005 ' Table of Contents: 1. Narrative ' II. Proposed Conditions CN and ICPR Runoff Output III. Proposed Conditions ICPR Input Data and Nodal Map ' IV. Filter Drawdown Analysis V. Required Treatment Volume VI. Appendix ' Aerial Soil Survey Map USGS Quadrangle Map FIRM Map 0 I. Drainage Report Narrative General Overview: The 15 story Condominium project proposed to replace the Adams Mark Hotel is located on a 2.45 acre site in Pinellas County, Florida (Section 07, Township 29 south, Range 15 east). The site is located at the southern end of Clearwater Beach, and is bordered by Clearwater Pass and Gulfview Blvd. The proposed condominium has a total of 78 condo-hotel units and 113 traditional condominium units. The lower 3 floors will be utilized as parking, while the remaining floors will consist of residential units. Soil Survey Information: According to the SCS Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida, the soil found onsite is Coastal Beach (Co). See attached Soils Map. Flood Zone Information: ' According to FEMA Flood Information Rate Map panels 12103COI02G and 12103CO104G, the project is located within the AE (Elev. 12 NGVD), VE (Elev. 13 NGVD) and VE( Elev. 14 NGVD) flood zones. See attached FIRM Map and Boundary Survey. Existing Conditions: The proposed site is currently being utilized as the 13 story Adams Mark Hotel. The driveways to the site are from Gulfview Boulevard. The current hotel provides no treatment or attenuation, and as such the site's existing conditions were not analyzed. The majority of the site currently drains to the City Stormwater System, either by pipe or sheet flow. The extreme western portion of the site drains over the sea wall and into the Gulf Proposed Conditions: The proposed project has an underground stormwater vault, located under the ramp between parking levels. All roof runoff will be routed directly to the vault. The stormwater system will treat the volume of water required by SWFWMD, which is the first 3/" of runoff because the system discharges to an Outstanding Florida Water body. For this 1.87 acre project site (the buildable area landward of the sea wall) the required treatment volume is 5091 cubic feet. The water quality treatment is achieved by effluent filtration (filter drain). The treatment occurs between elevations 2.62 and 5.0. A filter length of 30 feet is required to draw down the treatment volume within the allotted 24 hour time frame (per City of Clearwater Criteria). The proposed Stormwater System will collect runoff from the entire site, landward of the sea wall, and ultimately discharge the runoff beyond the treatment volume into the Gulf. The stormwater discharge for the 25 year/ 24 hour storm is 7.85 cfs, and will pass (through the seawall) landward of the Coastal Construction Control Line(CCCL). Operation and Maintenance: The owner of the property will be responsible for operating and maintaining the proposed stormwater system. Attached is a copy of the letter outlining the operation and maintenance responsibilities, which was mailed to the owner. II. Proposed Conditions CN and ICPR Runoff Output 0 0 Runoff Curve Numbers Project. Adams Mark Hotel Site By. BKF Date: 411812005 Location: Clearwater Beach-Pinellas County Job # 699-271 EPN 209 Basin Onsite Area HSG CN Impervious 1.67 AC C 98 Open Space 0.20 AC C 74 RESULTS: AREA= 1.87 AC CN= 95.5 Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs Gulf BASE Post25 0.00 1.620 3.000 0.0000 0 12.04 7.845 0.00 0.000 Vault BASE Post25 12.04 5.455 6.000 0.0050 2134 12.00 7.954 12.04 7.845 0 • Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 • • III. Proposed Conditions ICPR Input Data and Nodal Map -------- BasinNs -------------_-_---_-------------------------_--------------____ -------------- ' Name: Onsite Node: Vault Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 29.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 15.00 Area(ac): 1.870 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 95.50 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------ Nodes ______________________________________---------- _______________________________ Name: Gulf Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 1.620 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 3.000 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 1.620 ' 12.00 1.620 29.00 1.620 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Vault Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 5.000 ' Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 6.000 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) ' ----- ---------0.0990 6.000 0.0990 - -------------- Drop Structures --------------- Name: Name: OCS From Node: Vault Length(ft): 270.00 Group: BASE To Node: Gulf Count: 1 ' UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Geometry: Circular Circular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Span(in): 18.00 18.00 Flow: Both Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Invert(ft): 2.500 1.800 Exit Loss Coef: 0.500 ' Manning's N: 0.012000 0.012000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Solution Incs: 10 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ' Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ' *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure OCS *** TABLE Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Type: Vertical: Mavis Top Clip(in): 0.000 ' Flow: Both Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Span(in): 96.00 Invert(ft): 5.000 Rise(in): 999.00 Control Elev(ft): 5.000 Weirs ---------- ------- ------------- . Name: From Node: Group: BASE To Node: 1 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 2 0 0 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Horizontal Geometry: Circular Span(in): 0.00 Rise(in): 0.00 Invert(ft): 0.000 Control Elevation(ft): 0.000 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.200 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 --------------------------------------------- Hydrology Simulations --------------------------------------------- ----------- Name: Post25 Filename: K:\209\ProjData\DrnData\ICPR\Post25.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 15.00 --------------------------------------------- Routing Simulations -------------- --------------------------------------------- _______ ---------- Name: Post25 Hydrology Sim: Post25 Filename: K:\209\ProjData\DrnData\ICPR\Post25.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 30.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 30.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 15.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes Boundary Conditions ------------------ Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 2 1 • • Nodes A Stage/Area V Stage/Volume T Time/Stage M Manhole ¦ Basins 0 Overland Flow U SCS Unit Hydro S Santa Barbara Links P Pipe W Weir C Channel D Drop Structure B Bridge R Rating Curve H Breach Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. 0 IV. Filter Drawdown Analysis 1] SUNSPREE CONDOMINIUM DETENTION VAULT SIDE-DRAIN FILTER DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS E h ^h V ^V Lmin Lmax Lavg HYD. AREA FLOW AVG. ^T ET NGVD TOTAL INCR. TOTAL INCR. GRAD. FILTER Q=KIA FLOW INCR. TOTAL 5.00 3.13 XXXXXXXX 5,084 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.5650 101.4 860.1 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.0 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.24 XXXXXXXX 508 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 799.4 0.6 XXXXXXXX 4.76 2.89 XXXXXXXX 4,575 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.4460 94.3 738.7 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.6 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.24 XXXXXXXX 508 XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 682.7 0.7 XXXXXXXX 4.52 2.65 XXXXXXXX 4,067 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.3270 87.1 626.6 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 1.4 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.24 XXXXXXXX 508 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 575.1 0.9 XXXXXXXX 4.29 2.42 XXXXXXXX 3,559 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.2080 80.0 523.7 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2.3 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.24 XXXXXXXX 508 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 476.8 1.1 XXXXXXXX 4.05 2.18 XXXXXXXX 3,050 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.0890 72.8 429.9 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 3.3 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.24 XXXXXXXX 508 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 387.7 1.3 XXXXXXXX 3.81 1.94 XXXXXXXX 2,542 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.9700 65.7 345.4 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 4.6 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.24 XXXXXXXX 508 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 307.8 1.7 XXXXXXXX 3.57 1.70 XXXXXXXX 2,033 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.8510 58.6 270.1 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 6.3 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.24 XXXXXXXX 508 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 237.1 2.1 XXXXXXXX 3.33 1.46 XXXXXXXX 1,525 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.7320 51.4 204.0 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 8.4 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.24 XXXXXXXX 508 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 175.6 2.9 XXXXXXXX 3.10 1.23 XXXXXXXX 1,017 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.6130 44.3 147.1 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 11.3 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.24 XXXXXXXX 508 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXX 123.3 4.1 XXXXXXXX 2.86 0.99 XXXXXXXX 508 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.4940 37.1 99.4 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 15.5 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.24 XXXXXXXX 508 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 80.2 6.3 XXXXXXXX 2.62 0.75 XXXXXXXX 0 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.3750 30.0 61.0 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 21.8 5.00 DLW (TOP OF TREATMENT VOLUME) 2.62 NWL (BOTTOM OF TREATMENT VOLUME) 1.87 ELEVATION OF CENTERLINE OF PIPE 2136 AREA @ DLW (s.f.) 2136 AREA @ NWL(s.f.) 2 L min 2 L max 5.42 "K" (f./hr.) 30 REQUIRED UNDERDRAIN LENGTH 21.8 TIME FOR SYSTEM TO DRAW DOWN (24 HOURS BASED ON CITY OF CLEARWATER CRITERIA) 0 10 • 0 V. Required Treatment Volume • Adams Mark Redevelopment Required Treatment Volume Required Treatment of 3/4" per Acre Required Treatment for 1.87 Acres= 5091.08 ft3 Vault Area: 2136 ft2 • Treatment Depth: 5091 ft3/2136 ft2 2.38 ft Elev. at Top of Treatment: 5.00 0 0 VI. Appendix O .'S 'qn ? ew , I '. . S? ?Ad'? i :i )4R' a ?. ?I31? .ti ?, r D _ y3E 2 a za n ig N N `c m m m y • • _ -. - -?-...am,..wa.+axiaiwp?awrse?.Se°w'fms5si2?H?5.: ?19? fi.. '?.'!?•:"?'l^?(b,S.'+'A'Ti?:4Y ?:.?..•.•- •?•?•:-... ... .. 01 838WnN 133HS 0 .'1 4 now i , l n ?•? r s Clearwater Beach ?? ?' L ,?• ILI, 16 aim Project Site _ l; t-4 ?j A 1 Light 4V AJ • a -+ T ice( , Light -J R M, ti C #' dC? Lt t r ??Ci S f Light - Arid Key -?- ' ;.: Park ' ADAMS MARK 1 inch equals 1,000 feet USGS MAP - CLEARWATER QUAD i GIS Data This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a variety of sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to be FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ' con,ideTed comprehensive for Site-spedflc data. ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS P 0 0 APPROXIMATE SCALE 500 0 50 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 102 OF 327 )SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) CONTAAIS: CCMM K Y NUMBER PANEL SWW( ncwwum,nD a Dsae nm e axwn.arra MIMI ON 0 Mob yy4?MLYfpr. M IUP MUMSiI fowl bM Mk b wtl abon fwM lead m (names igwlem bM WC MAP NUMBER M03CO102G EFFECTIVE DATE- SEPTEMBER 3,1003 Federal Emergency Management Agency his is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It as extracted using F-MIT On-Line. This map does not reflect changes r amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the tie block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance rogram flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www. msc.fema.gc ZONE VE ZONE AE (EL 13) \ (EL 12) APPROXIMATE SCALE JOINS PANEL 0102 8 500 O NATIONAL ROOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FIRM ROOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 104 OF 321 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED( CONTAINS: COAWI41'rf NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX( BaLEAJR. M OF Osm OAI a oFN WA on, aF mass aIN a Federal Emergency Management Agency I 39 This is an official copy of a portion of the alone referenced flood map. It was extracted using F-MIT On-line. This map does not reflect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title dock. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program good maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at w ..msc.fema.gov FLD2005-05047 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Date Received: 05/26/2005 TW RESIDENCES ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 276A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED DO MAY 21 2005 CLWCoverSheet PLAVVIVG DEPAR MENT Ci iV OF CLEA L-'jA3ER I T Y OF C L E A. R W A T E R :.g1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posi- O1;E1cE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIT.nI\G, 100 SOUTH MrR•r1.r AVENUE, CLrARWAIBR, FLORIDA 33756 TELrP110Nr -(727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING Drvi.-LOPMENT REvIEW November 21, 2006 Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Armstrong: On November 21, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard shall be submitted by February 16, 2008. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael Del", AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentICD BIFLEX (FLD)Uhactive or Finished ApplicationsIGulfview S 0430 TW Residences (T) - ApprovedlGulfview S 0430 CDB Time Extension Development Order 11.21.06doc PuANK 1111MnaU. MAYOR John Dnli;%n, COt nc:u. n•;•a+ra: IIO)-r Il:uni:rO , COQ ixul..\u:>11wiR I ILLJONSON, COI ACILMENIBI:it CARLEN A. PFIERSEN, C01,N01,u6:NMI:R "EQUAL IiMPLOl•Mr:NT AND Arrn;MATivi: Ac'no N N\tPi.cwi:W' Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 5:49 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Jayne - I'm bad; you're good. Thanks for catching the miscue. Attached is the corrected copy. Wayne EFM? iv ;ulfview S 430 Time Extension ... Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 10:52 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07068, 401, 411 and 421 S. Gulfview Blvd and FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022, 430 S. Gulfview Blvd Jayne - Attached are the memorandums regarding the time extension requests for the above referenced cases for the November 21, 2006, CDB meeting. Wayne Gulfview S 401 - ;ulfview S 430 Time 421 Time Exte... Extension ... JOHNSON, OPE BOK , OR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RYAN C. GRIFFIN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.* SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIH-PIN LU* MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE BRETON H. PERMESLY F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS KIMBERLY L. SHARPE JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO. 45934.109561 Via Email and Hand Delivery Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 November 7, 2006 Re: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Case Nos. FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 Dear Michael: On behalf of the applicant and property owner, T/W Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC, we hereby request an additional extension of the time to initiate a building permit for the referenced project, for a period of one-year to February 16, 2008. As set forth in the amended development order, you previously granted a six- month extension to February 16, 2007. The reason for this request for the additional extension is that the development of the project has been delayed due to deteriorating market conditions. We understand that this request for extension must be reviewed by the Community Development Board In accordance with Section 4-407 of the Clearwater Community Development Code. Please schedule this matter for the November 21, 2006 CDB meeting. If you need any additional information in order to set this matter for hearing, please contact my legal assistant, Jayne Sears, or me as soon as possible. CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) CLEAR W ATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 ' U R D NOV 7 2006 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER TAMPA OFFICE 403 EAST MADISON ST. SUITE 400 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-1100) TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELEPHONE: (8 13) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 • JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Michael Delk, AICP November 7, 2006 Page 2 We thank you and the Board for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL BURNS, LLP E. D. Armstrong III EDA/js cc: Mr. Jeff Handlin Mr. Joe Burdette #389217 v1 44 4 S 1 P .. . 1 . 5 ? q r ' t C ITY OF CLEARWATER ,,. PLANNING DEPARTMENT r? ?,'A??T [[]+11?,'{w 11' POST OFFIU BOX 4748CI.uRWATER FLORIDA 33758-4748 ?+?' +?w / y?'" ti, MUNICIPAL. SERVICGS BUILDING, LOO SOUTH MYR'I'IT AVENUE, CLEARWA"CER, FLORIDA 33756 TI?LrPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANG. PIANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 26, 2006 Mr. Chuck Jones, AIA, Principal Curts Gaines Hall Jones Architects 1213 East 6"` Avenue Tampa, Florida 33605-4905 Re: Development Order - Minor Revision FLD2005-05047 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard - Indigo Beach Residences Dear Mr. Jones: On August 16, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 18 conditions the above referenced case, which was a request for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to six feet (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to eight feet from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625- 627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4- 1402. A proposal has been submitted to revise the approved project with the following: • Slightly widen and relocate both the entrance and driveways for the residential and hotel portions of the project; • Remove the retail portions previously shown; • Reconfigure the parking areas to provide better circulation and fewer dead ends, retaining the 78 hotel parking spaces on the first floor, but replacing the public parking spaces with residential guest parking spaces; • Levels 2 and 3 units were reconfigured and enlarged, providing nine units total on these two levels in lieu of the 22 smaller villas previously shown; • Minor layout revisions to the residential social amenities (club) on Level 4; PRANK I IiRRARi). MAYOR oim DmAN, CC x:NC:n.antaiisitR I1O)T I I:UVi:ION, Cot NciiMLMHFR B11.1joNsoN, comcu:mntnusr.iz C-m i•:N A. Pi:'irKSF\, CO NCILM M ER "IicdiJAI, FIMPLO MENFAND AF•r•u;MA•riw Ac:'i10N I:MPI. M1:1C .4 September 26, 2006 Jones - Page 2 • The number of residential units has been revised to 10 per floor for Levels 5 - 10, as well as the unit layouts; • The number of residential units has been revised to nine units on Level 11, as well as the unit layouts; • The number of residential units has been revised to seven units on Levels 12 - 14, as well as the unit layouts; • The number of residential units has been revised to six units on Level 15, as well as the unit layouts; • Private elevator entries into each residential unit are now provided; • Hotel units are now provided with exterior balconies for visual interest; In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be a Minor Revision and are APPROVED with the following conditions that must be addressed on the site, landscape and building plans for building permits: 1. Service portions of the building for both the residential and hotel areas on Level 1 must meet FEMA VE-Zone requirements; 2. The finished deck elevation on the west side of the club will need to be revised to be consistent the finished floor elevation in the club (32'-6") on Sheet 0-A1.41; 3. The approved setback from the Coastal Construction. Control Line (CCCL) must be shown on the revised site plan Sheet 3 of 13 prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. Columns for the trellises in front of the building must be removed from Sheet 0-A2.10 (left side of elevation); 5. Sheet 0-A2.20 must be revised to show the two support columns for the trellis on the northeast side of the building, as indicated on Sheet 0-A1.10; 6. The three rooms on the front of Level 12 (roof) of the hotel building must be for mechanical equipment and is not intended as storage rooms; and 7. The open rooftop pavilion shown on the northwest corner of the residential building shall be for architectural ornamentation only and shall not be used by the residents at any time (occupied for sunset observations, parties, etc.). Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for this residential building, the developer shall record in the public records restrictive covenants or restrictions in the condominium documents for this open rooftop pavilion and submit a copy to the Planning Department. It is noted that the civil plans submitted August 28, 2006, have not been reviewed as part of this Minor Revision, as they were not previously submitted as part of the revision package. The civil plans will be reviewed as part of the site development permit #BCP2006-06699. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, P Planning Director Cc: Joe Burdette S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslGu?iew S 0430 TW Residences (T) - ApprovedlGulfview S 0430 Minor Revisions Development Order 9.26.06.doc C ITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Box 4748, CLrnkWnrErl, Fr.orirnn 33758-47 8 ''ATER?; $0 Pos,. 01,1:1C. MUNICIPAL Si:wicis BuILDING, 100 Sari MrirrLE AvFNIT, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 I'ra.r:r l rove (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE. PIANNING DEVELOPMENT REVll?W June 20, 2006 Mr. Tim Knight Taylor Woodrow 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33767 RE: FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Knight: On August 16, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to six feet (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to eight feet from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (August 16, 2006). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On June 9, 2006, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited the problem of changing architectural firms, the process of revising plans through the Minor Revision process that is still PRANK I IIIMAIM, NIMOr .lunN DORAN, C(A XCHAII.N11 R IIc»-I I i:uin:rc , C(f NcrI.NiI:m *I' 13n.i. ?c N,c N, CurNC.n. nt>nci:r ® C:V(u[N A. I'1' FRSEN, G)i NCHAWNIBER, Irc r:Ar. I:,?mi n u:Nrn?i Arrn;at:?rnr. Acre .N FMITM1::R • June 20, 2006 Knight - Page Two • being processed (we have given conceptual or tentative approval pending the resubmission of plans responding to review comments issued February 24, 2006), construction costs affecting the design of the project, coordination of issues of construction scheduling interfacing with the City's Beach Walk project and economic conditions that have slowed sales of units. Since the approval of this project, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per dwelling unit. This project was originally approved with 196 parking spaces for 112 attached dwelling units (overall parking provided of 274 spaces less the required parking for 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units at one parking space per room/unit), at a parking ratio of 1.75 parking spaces per dwelling unit. The Minor Revision currently being reviewed provides 185 parking spaces for 112 attached dwelling units (overall parking provided of 264 spaces less 79 spaces dedicated to the hotel, but including 13 guest spaces), at a parking ratio of 1.65 parking spaces per dwelling unit. 2. Section 6-109.B was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. In considering the above changes to the Code, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension to February 16, 2007, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. • • June 20, 2006 Knight - Page Three If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, y Michae Del" lk ICP Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0430 TW Residences (7) - ApprovedlGulfview S 0430 Time Extension Development Order 6 20.06.doc ?F 1 inDIG'O BEACH RESIDENCES June 9, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida, 33756 Re: Indigo Beach, 401, 411 and 421 Gulf View Blvd., Clearwater Beach Case # FLD2005-07068 Dear Mr. Delk: Please accept this letter as our request for a 1-year extension for the above referenced Development Order for the Indigo Beach Project on Clearwater Beach. This request is based on the land development code section 4.04 and the specific criteria for our request is as follows: 1. We have changed architectural firms and have had to go through the minor revision process that has taken a little longer than we had anticipated. 2. Due to increase in construction costs, architectural construction drawings are taking us longer than normal as we work to keep our costs in line while still maintaining our commitment to quality. 3. We have been participating with, and are still in the process of working with, the Clearwater Engineering Department in coordinating certain issues as they relate to beach walk and how those issues will interface with our construction scheduling. Should you require any additional information, please contact me at your convenience. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Tim Knig Project Manager 430 SOUTH GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER BEACH FLORIDA 33767 800-446-3057 F 727-441-8654 WWW.INDIGOBEACH.COM 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 4:20 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Cc: Joe Burdette (E-mail) Subject: Indigo Beach Residences, 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Jayne - As we have spoken, we are giving conceptual or tentative approval of a Minor Revision for the above referenced project. Since the plans submitted for the Minor Revision act as the new approved plans for building permit review (when submitted), we request the plans be amended in accordance with the attached list of necessary revisions. Please submit one set of revised plans for a final determination of this being a Minor Revision, along with any necessary written narrative. I have reviewed these plans with Traffic Engineering and have had some discussion with Mark Matheny, Plans Examiner, with Development Services regarding the Velocity Flood Zone issues and their comments are embodied in the attached list. While these are the architectural plans that have been submitted, it is presumed that appropriate consistency revisions will be made to the Civil Plans prior to the submission for site/building construction permits, unless it is critical to ensure compliance with the prior CDB approval at this time. Wayne Revisions needed to Indigo Bea... .-0 0 Revisions Needed to Indigo Beach Residences Plans - 430 South Gulfview Blvd. February 24, 2006 1. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Due to the site being within a FEMA V-Zone, all service portions of the building must be above Base Flood Elevation (BFE). Relocate, for the hotel portion, the reception, office and accessory retail upstairs above BFE. Relocate, for the residential portion, the reception, office and manager's office upstairs above BFE. 2. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Level 1 hotel parking is 81 spaces (not 79). 3. Stairwell egress - This has not been reviewed with Building Plans Reviewer. This should be done to ensure compliance with Building Code provisions and that such required egress does not create issues for the proposed design (thereby reducing the number of parking spaces). 4. Sheet 0-A1.30 - There are 83 residential spaces (not 84) provided on the Podium Level 3. 5. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Show the sidewalk on the west and northwest sides of the building connecting to the sidewalk on City property to the north. 6. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Show the connector sidewalk from the covered patio by the residential portion to the sidewalk on City property to the north. 7. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Revise the trash staging concrete pad to a side setback of two feet, as approved under FLD2005-05047. 8. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Show the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) on the west and northwest sides. Ensure the minimum setback from the CCCL to the southwest corner of the building is at least eight feet, as approved under FLD2005-05047. 9. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Parking spaces on the west side of the building on both the north and south sides of the stairwell require the drivers to back out "blind" due to the solid walls of the stairwell. Either eliminate these two parking spaces or provide visibility improvements (mirrors or other alternative measures). 10. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Provide pedestrian crosswalk pavement markings from the two handicap parking spaces on the south side to the hotel lobby. 11. Sheet 0-A1.10 - When drivers are attempting to locate an empty parking space within the hotel parking area on Level 1, there are dead ends for the parking areas. The only area of concern is the northernmost parking area where a turn around area is necessary for motorists to be able to turn around in. Eliminate the easternmost parking space on the north side to provide this area as a turn around (mark/label/sign as such). 12. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Level 1 guest parking area - Flip the handicap access aisle to the south side of the handicap space to be adjacent to the lobby wall on the south. 13. Sheets 0-A1.20 and 0-A1.30 - Ensure a 44" clearance from end of handicap parking spaces to the elevator lobby southeast of the stairwell south of Villa 01 on both Levels 2 and 3. 14. Dimension the width of the balcony projections from the face of the building (maximum of two feet allowed by Code). 15. Ensure the vertical height clearance for handicap van is a minimum of 8'-2". 16. Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. 17. Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels. 18. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.10 - Unclear of what the dashed line rectangles represent on the roof. Advise/remove. 19. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.10 - Provide the height of the residential condo building from the top of roof slab to the top of the cupola. 20. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.10 - Windows indicated are much plainer than that on the approved plans (proposed windows are large single panes of glass instead of windows on the approved plans that had more panes of glass, which gives a different appearance and character of the fagade). Revise or provide a justification for such change. 21. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.10 - The letter of request for a Minor Revision indicates that "bahama" shutters are still be provided, it is unclear where on the fagade/windows. Revise/show. 22. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.10 - Provide a Building Materials Legend similar to that on the approved plans, as it is difficult to determine the materials and colors of these materials (example: roof material looks like a standing seam metal roof, whereas the approved plans indicate a clay barrel tile roof system). 23. Sheet 0-A2.10 - North Elevation - Score lines in the stucco finish are shown but it is unclear if such scoring has been inadvertently left off from the easternmost and westernmost bays of windows (scoring on the center bays of windows go much higher). Advise/revise. 24. Sheet 0-A2.20 - East Elevation - Balcony railings for the northern bay do not have the details similar to other balcony railings ("x" in center of railing). Revise. Additionally true for the balcony railings on the northeast side (portion seen from the east but is really on an angle - look at North Elevation for detail on this balcony railing). 25. Sheet 0-A2.20 - Revise the title from "Hotel Condos Building East Elevation" to "Res. Condos Building East Elevation." 26. Sheet 0-A2.20 - East Elevation - Add the cupola on top of the building. 27. Sheet 0-A2.30 - South Elevation - Balcony railings do not have the details similar to other balcony railings ("x" in center of railing) for Levels 4 - 14 (as shown on other elevations and as shown on Level 15). Revise. 28. Sheet 0-A2.30 - South Elevation - Walls on the south wall of the western leg of the "L" for Levels 12 - 15 are very plain from the approved plans that had a lot more detail and character. Revise. 29. Sheet 0-A2.40 - Revise the Club railing on Level 4 to be consistent with other railings in their design. 30. Sheet 0-A2.40 - Add the cupola on top of the building. 31. Sheet 0-A2.40 - Balcony railings do not have the details similar to other balcony railings ("x" in center of railing) for Level 8 (second bank of balconies from the left). Additionally, the balcony railings for the southernmost bank of balconies (right side) should be consistent from the standpoint of number of "x's" in the railing. Revise. II&TTER&O F11 RAN[ , I T TAA L Curls Gaines Hall Jones Architects 1213 East 6th Avenue 813. 228.8000 Tampa, FL 33605 813. 228.0770 fax Sending To: City of Clearwater Planning Department From: Chuck Jones 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Date: February 1, 2006 Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Job #: 05-23 Attention: Mr. Wayne Wells Re: INDIGO BEACH RES. Govf{m' We are sending you x Attached -Under Separate Cover via --• the following items: Shop Drawings Prints X Plans Samples Specifications Copy of Letter Change Order Other uo ies mate 'N 0. Description lea. 1/20/06 South and East Elevations of Condo Hotel THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For Approval Approved as Submitted Resubmit x For Your Use Approved as Noted Submit x As Requested Returned for Corrections Return For Review & Comment Other Remarks: Copies To: Copies for Approval Copies for Distribution Corrected Prints U L(? 7P 0 1 2006 F'LA?; 6 DE v'ELOPtvjt ^a r SyC OF GUAMATZA Signed: a4dA )??_ C u r t s G a I n e s H a I I J o n e s Architects 1213 East 6th Avenue, Tampa, Florida, 336054905 Voice (813) 228-8000 Fax (813) 228-0770 Web Site cgharchitects.com FL Cert 900001590 December 16, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 Re: 430 South Gulfview Indigo Beach Residences (Formerly Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment) Minor Revisions Dear Mr. Wells, Per your request from our meeting on November 1St, below you find a listing and brief description/discussion of all of the "minor revisions" or refinements as allowed under section 4- 406 which have occurred on this proposed development since the Development Order of August 22, 2005. Please find attached one set of plans dated November 15, 2005 of the current schematic design documents for your use in comparing the proposed minor revisions or refinements to the conceptual plans (civil plans revise dated 7/13/2005 and the architectural plans of 5/25/2005) which were submitted for the development order. Also, please find attached with the current plans a site plan diagram which compares the original plan with the current proposed plan. As a quick background as to the main reason for these refinements, the Developer feels that the current plans will be more marketable, provide better circulation, and in general be more efficient and constructible than before. The development team has remained the same except that the Architect is now Curts Gaines Hall Jones Architects (CGHJ) in lieu of Gillette Associates. Here then is the list of proposed minor revisions for your review; this list is organized per the nine (9) categories of Section 4-406 which states that a minor revision is one which: 1. Does not alter the location of any private street and/or driveway by more than 20 feet Proposed minor revision: Re: the ground level/building comparison plan. The proposed plan modifies the width and location of the condo hotel and condominium entry exit drives by less than 20' each. As measured along the east property line the condo hotel entry/exit drive has shifted approximately 19'-8" to the north and is now approximately 32' wide (12' exit, 4' median, 16' entry) in lieu of 24' wide. The condominium entry/exit drive has shifted approximately 5' to the north and is divided into a 12' exit lane, a 12' median, and a 16' wide entry lane in lieu of a 24' wide entry egress lane; the net increase in lane width is 4'. These proposed refinements provide a landscape bed in front of the transformer location where none was indicated before and provides improved lane flow and stacking. Please note that per the development order the separation of the condo and condo hotel drives (as measured at the 0 Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment Minor Rev. Letter 12.16.2005 Page 2 centerline of the entry lane) has remained at 90'. Also, please note these plans are still preliminary and we will be working with the City of Clearwater's engineering department before we finalize this layout. 2. Does not change the use unless such change is of similar or less intensity, as determined by the community development coordinator. Proposed minor revision: Prior to the ratification of the 2,910 sf of retail and the exterior "kiosk" spaces had been deleted; this change provided slightly less intensity as allowed. The primary proposed use and density of 112 residential condominium units and 78 overnight accommodation (condo hotel) units remains the same. 3. Does not increase the density or intensity of the development. No minor revisions are requested: the density remains the same as stated above. 4. Does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area. The current proposed plan does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area as required and indicated in the development order. 5. Does not result in a substantial change to the location of a structure previously approved. There is no substantial change to the location of the structure. Re: the building comparison plan. The overall building location and massing remain very similar to the original proposed plan. The podium base, L-shaped residential condominium tower and the condo hotel tower are all in the same approximate location; only minor revisions have occurred. See building comparison plan for dimensional variations. 6. Does not result in a substantial modification or cancellation of any condition placed upon the application as originally approved. No substantial modifications or cancellation of any condition of the development order are requested; all of the conditions of the development order will be met. 7. Does not add property to the parcel proposed for development. No property has been added. 8. Does not increase the height of the buildings in a manner that will change the overall height of the project, will not alter the scale of the project, does not exceed the maximum height permitted in by the applicable special area plan and zoning district. Proposed minor revision: The current plan proposes that the residential condo building increase from 149.5' to 150' as measured from FEMA elevation 16.0 to the top of the structural roof deck as allowed in the T (Tourist) Zoning district. From the standpoint of the development order this is no change as the proposed building height is now consistent with the development order with the building height of the condo hotel being 100' above FEMA and the residential condo tower being 150' above FEMA. With no effective height differential there is no alteration to the scale of the project. 9. Any other minor revision that does not substantially alter the character and design of the project. There are a variety of miscellaneous minor revisions as generally listed below. However, it is our opinion that none of these substantially alter the character and design of the project.(See revised exterior elevations). The overall massing, building placement, materials, color scheme, and building height are generally the same. Architectural elements such as * Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment Minor Rev. Letter 12.16.2005 • Page 3 trellises, mansards and hip roofs, eave brackets, trim banding, "bahama" shutters, horizontal stucco banding at the base, decorative aluminum and glass handrails, cupolas are all features which remain on the elevations; while these elements have been composed differently based upon revised internal floor plans, these elevations are still of the same general character. Other minor revisions: 1) Misc. ground floor minor revisions include (see sheet 0-A1.10, comparison plan and civil cover sheet): a) Parking layout has been refined to provide better circulation and fewer dead ends. b) The ground floor building coverage is now 62,984 sf in lieu of 61,923sf; this represents a negligible increase of only 1.7%. c) Number of condo hotel guest parking spaces remains the same at 78 (with 4 handicapped accessible). There are now 13 guest spaces for the residential condominium (with 1 handicapped accessible) in lieu of 23 public spaces; this adjustment was made due to the deletion of the retail area previously mentioned. d) As mentioned previously, the retail and exterior retail "kiosk" space has been eliminated. e) The ramp to the upper parking levels is more internal now allowing room for a condominium guest arrival drop off, reception lobby, mail room and related condo manager office. These changes will result in less congestion along Gulf Boulevard as there is more internal room for `stacking'. f) A required transformer pad area at the southeast is now indicated adjacent to the trash pick up area. g) A service elevator has been added to the condo hotel and the building core has been modified. h) The general layout of the condominium core has been refined/modified; see typical level 5-10 for additional explanation. i) A beach access/exit corridor is now provided for both the condo and condo hotel with the access doors to the north. J) The at grade terrace on the north side has been deleted; additional landscaping will be in its place. k) Fountains and/or plant beds are being considered in front of both the condo and condo hotel. Landscaping/hardscaping is still in the schematic stage. 2) Misc. parking levels 2 and 3 minor revisions include (see sheets 0-A1.20, 0-A1.30): a) Parking layout has been refined to provide better circulation and fewer dead ends. b) The parking count for the condominium levels 2 and 3 is now 172 total (with 6 handicapped spaces) in lieu of 174; this still exceeds the 168 minimum required condo parking requirement of (1.5 x 112 units). c) Fire command room has been moved to the second floor to be above flood plain. d) Miscellaneous core revisions. e) The "sundecks" along the west side at levels 2 and 3 have been deleted. f) Levels 2 and 3 now contain a total of 9 larger condo villas (4 units on level 2, and 5 units on level 3) in lieu of 22 smaller villas (See proposed revised unit count diagram). These villas are now arranged along the northwest quadrant of the building in lieu of along the north and northeast. 3) Miscellaneous podium level 4 minor revisions include (see sheet 0-A1.40): a) Miscellaneous plan revisions to the condominium units 1 thru 7 (previously A-G); general location of exterior walls has not changed significantly. a Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment Minor Rev. Letter 12.16.2005 . Page 4 b) Condominium owners now have private elevator access. c) Miscellaneous minor layout revisions to condominium social amenities (club); functions still include, theatre room, fitness, social room with bar, library, billiard room, and restrooms. d) A covered and/or trellised walkway now provides access from the condo units to the social/club area. e) Miscellaneous minor revisions to condo hotel are still underway; the layout is yet to be determined although the lone hotel previously indicated on the 4th level will now be an added unit on level 5. f) The 4th level landscaped pool deck terrace is still being developed but essentially will provide a spa and pool and pool side cabanas for each the condo and condo hotel. A detailed landscape plan is yet to be developed and coordinated with these miscellaneous refinements. g) An egress stair has been added at the southwest corner of the pool deck to grade. h) A guestibeach access elevator (serving levels 1-4) has been relocated from the south to the interior court. 4) Miscellaneous typical levels 5-10 minor revisions include (see sheet 1-A1.00, 2-A1.00): a) Miscellaneous internal plan revisions to the condominium units 1 thru 10 have occurred. General locations of the exterior walls have not changed significantly due to internal unit plan revisions. See proposed unit count diagram and building comparison plan for more information. b) The proposed condo plan at each of these levels now contain 10 units per level in lieu of 9 per level; the units are narrower on average than the prior version so that the overall massing remains very similar. c) Condominium building type has been revised to provide private elevator entries into each unit (this was the main reason for the plan change and makes the units more unique to the Clearwater market, and thus, more marketable). d) The south and east elevations which face the 4th level courtyard are now provided with a covered exterior stair access walk which will provide added visual interest and relief to these elevations. e) Miscellaneous internal plan revisions to the condo hotel have occurred; there are still 11 hotel units per floor at levels 6-10, with the exception of level 5 which will contain 12 units. The units which face the internal courtyard are now oriented toward the southwest view. f) In general the condo hotel units are now provided with balconies for the majority of the units; this provides added visual interest and relief to the exterior elevations. 5) Miscellaneous level 11 minor revisions include (see sheets 1-A1.05, 2-A1.05): a) The same unit plan revisions have occurred at this level; units 1-9 are the same as below. b) The proposed condo plan at each of these levels now contain 9 units per level in lieu of 8 per level; the units are narrower on average than the prior version so that the overall massing remains very similar. c) The condo building steps back at the south with the "drop off' of the most southern unit (unit 10 in lieu of unit J) in a very similar way to the prior plan. d) Similar internal plan revisions to the condo hotel have occurred at the top level as have occurred below; however the top level now contains 12 units in lieu of 11 units. The overall massing has remained very similar. Adams Mark Hotel RedevelopmeMinor Rev. Letter 12.16.2005 • Page 5 6) Miscellaneous levels 12-14 minor revisions include (see sheet 1-A1.10): a) The same unit plan revisions have occurred at this level; units 2-8 are essentially the same as below. b) The proposed plan contains 7 units per level in lieu of 6 per level; the new units are narrower on average than the prior version so that the overall massing remains very similar. c) With the drop of unit 01 and 09 from the plan below, the building steps back on the south and east wings; this is very similar to the step backs which occurred on the prior plan. 7) Miscellaneous level 15 minor revisions include (see sheet 1-A1.20): d) The same unit plan revisions have occurred at this level; units 3-8 are essentially the same as below. e) The proposed plan contains 6 units per level in lieu of 5 per level; the new units are narrower on average than the prior version so that the overall massing remains very similar. f) Note that the stair/elevator core appendage on the east wing of the prior plan does not occur on the proposed plan since it is not necessary with the new core layout; this provides a slight reduction in the overall massing. g) With the drop of unit 01 and 09 from the plan below, the building steps back on the south and east wings; this is very similar to the step backs which occurred on the prior plan. Mr. Wells, we hope that you and your colleagues find that this list of minor revisions is clear and adequately addresses your needs for your review and hopeful authorization. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or comments. Regards, Chuck Jones, AIA, Principal Curts Gaines Hall Jones Architects 1213 E. 6th Avenue Tampa, FL 33605 813.228.8000 813.228.0770 fax chuck@cghjarchitects.com c: Jeff Handlin Ed Armstrong Octavio Cabrera Phil Graham Michael Delk Scott Rice y I - ' - I I I I I I I I I I I m in I I KEY: I New footprint New drive I Originalfootpiot - - - - - - I Original drive ----------- 0 ?N L.J. WI J Pq of 3 ?I W IH I> W J H LLJ Z I,W VIZ (S) 0 ZWQ J LIJ Cl nG c J J J ) PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE MY Gave grew"Im 0 A. IIIIWb NNAMS vror.RLL lr= b A0. MIM6NmMMM S (=Elf 10RI.20-ML UP= 5 NY Al1Ml9H1oa5 YARgiAim9GR 36m-aoww..MLL000. MA NAINen. NNN 3b40W.9LnLMEMSM0IM a CA rAAM T13M 09 LLY 7004.0DWOMASNM A mJ fAEf.M11M913110591RIS amoul.TONAM 8-ONE1144990MSMJAII E10 60 LVMMATMOWM'ANY ONA0CAR51 30X.R9..B9E004 b 9 0WV6?AF0LYFIB GVMAM15Ar" 'M.AQM.675"AASM 4 at MEYPMMA9mewRmM AAiIrNN 09.Mk0.WST99Ma7M am M QRt0.OWNYM 9/4MYlE 591.mM9M.I120SM.7006 PW Olm POTEMWMAEgP01BE0 l6iFN9MN WMEZID409.1001YM99M Wo EA E7R9AMAR9M Rnro 0l%lr.V Wd4 4 9 ELLAO MM OM SLYRTIM 30AL K.WSR. V= 0m t ANEM MM rAl0MJMM f0ALtr6M Y04 7 Wr LISLUMMA` "m n"W MIFOWURNNIM Om..b9RWJLW RMM M INM INSMAVARWr GLVVUIM 10AI.99..Ar9R904 4 M ME999Lm3Rm1EAJ0W eEMMm MR MN 6WMMF0A0lMNnONM105AAMS M RI RrlEn WAGRJLL RMAM6M9mme 84W.9MP9.MLL4a M M REM IA4 C 89ATA RAM 5Y#0.2CW.2f9RF1LLl0a A rW IWOLWIBIYOIf11011A F9AXAAlM MW.SA`Nf..b/9 V8W 7004 1 R M vmm vOfrNM HM.SM9aMY1MmXW Tfk M rMp9MRYAMMR R MAN MN1M971 MM1.10M..109LOm W= 0 W AaFMVAAmTIaA MW 90EFMAM aGAL.W A.M MMLL V= M w A06FIER1If2ODAAYAR'i11N YAEMATOPMA 900MM OGALJAWW.MLL 004 a SN 90FVfMXra.V FM MOPFAKAOM 0RL00M.9MY mm 9 9 64XlMYEND" MIMrALM 94NNIORC MWb MSH" E SAA A0MA9MAMa95 ANCmm G159A b W..0405MMM b TJN ?MNTI).MNMA 0MA00N MIZANME fON.100'9EM'O4 4X1 TO OAOBRFEm AM YAZMTD YN9GA@DM969A1L115NE fCmi_M t wiia A M 99Eg1 FZWA NNMM91rH11 AFEAAI7R0dM1RMIHAA5A5 A M 7AMM1PAVCFA GARMOA70 FNM bMLMM..R9RM9pM n w U12, o Q?o W °m ??ww Q =DC z LIJ W O? 2/`? NU 1 I'11L1 ULiL11L1111 & Company, P.A. Landscape Architecture Urban Design Planning 436 Second Street North St. Pet-b-g, Floude 33701-3012 Voice: 727 8I1-l225 Fu: 727-A2F1626 NOTE PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT IT SHALL BE DEMON5IRATED THAT ALL LANDSCAPE AND ACCENT LIGHTING SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPDCABIE SEA TURTLE REGULATIONS (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 8-1302-D IN CITY ORDNANCE / 692802) ALL LANDSCAPE LIGHTING TO HAVE PHDTO(ED. AND TIMER CONTROLS AND TO BE SET FOR NORMAL BUSINESS ACnMES. 0 w 40' OQ ALE =1"=20-0" 5C rp4ybxe u4sedob'Part7M =Nw MAAtbubew pMolasMM9 Mp h idnbW m&CF Mmm =4121.1 Po6 GMlum NLC9nI Drawn b,{. D RERIIiB amw by. PG R.AO- Datae 05011 L-1 I - 0 0 L4? h 7 tl 1 L.UE ROF T ?? A Nt °?. 1. 'T T Curts Gaines Hall Jones Architects 1213 East 6th Avenue 813. 228.8000 Tampa, FL 33605 813. 228.0770 fax Sending To: City of Clearwater Planning Department From: Chuck Jones 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Dated, 12-19-05 Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Job #: 05-23 Attention: WAYNE WELLS Re: INDIGO BEA RES. r-ouats2- We are sending you x Attached -Under Separate Cover via the following items: Shop Drawings Prints X Plans Samples Specifications Copy of Letter Change Order Other Conies Date No. Description lea. 12-19-05 I? Plans, section, elevations, data sheet 1 12-19-05 f 1 Bldg. comparison plan 1 12-16-05 5 Minor revision letter THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For Approval Approved as Submitted x For Your Use Approved as Noted As Requested Returned for Corrections For Review & Comment Other Resubmit Copies for Approval Submit Copies for Distribution Return Corrected Prints Remarks: Copies To: Signed: r s, LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 October 5, 2005 Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Amended Development Order - Case Nos. FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Armstrong: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On August 16, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to six feet (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to eight feet from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density per Section 6- 109; 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 4. The proposal complies with the Transfer of Development Rights per Section 3-1403; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR Biu. JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOIiN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER HOYr HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COI;NCILMEMBER "FQUAI. EMPLOYMENT AND AFPIRMAnvi,' Ac'nON EMPLOYER" • October 5, 2005 Armstrong - Page 2 5. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development. • Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That use of the property be for a maximum of 112 dwelling units, including eight units through the Transfer of Development Rights, and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units. The retail sales and services have been eliminated from the proposal; 3. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That occupancy by owners of units in the southern building be limited to sixty (60) days in any calendar year. Further, units in the southern building shall be offered or advertised as being available for rental to the public as overnight accommodations when not in use by the owner. At the request of the City Manager or designee, records of the rentals conducted for or by the owners of units shall be made available for examination to determine compliance with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines and/or any other enforcement afforded by City regulations. A license for the facility must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, shall be maintained. Units within this portion of the development shall not be used for any purpose other than overnight accommodations and shall not qualify for homestead exemption nor as a residential unit which can be used for voter registration, motor vehicle registration, Pinellas County public school registration or home or business occupational licenses; 5. That the sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 6. That all City approvals and easements necessary for the sidewalk connection to the sidewalk on City property to the north be obtained prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion; 7. That the applicant obtain all right-of-way, easements or other legal instruments prior to the issuance of building permits for the installation of any landscaping and irrigation on the City property north of the subject property; 8. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 9. That fencing within the visibility triangles and waterfront visibility triangles be brought into compliance with Code provisions prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. Fence height increases above that otherwise permitted and alternate fence materials shall only be allowed (1) in the waterfront visibility triangle if a letter of "no objection" is submitted from the adjacent condominium association board and (2) in the visibility triangle if acceptable to the Engineering Department; 10. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625-627 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625-627 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625-627 Bay • October 5, 2005 Armstrong - Page 3 • Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 11. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 12. That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 13. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 14. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 15. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 16. That all construction comply with FEMA requirements; 17. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 18. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (August 16, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within ene two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 30, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). • • October 5, 2005 Armstrong - Page 4 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, , Micha el Delk, AICP Planning Director S.IPlanning DeparlmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finisher! Applications IGulfview S 0430 TW Residences (T) - ApprovedlGulfview S 430 Development Order Amended 10.5.05.doc LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW le-t QTY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 August 22, 2005 Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Development Order - Case Nos. FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Armstrong: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On August 16, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to six feet (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to eight feet from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density per Section 6- 109; 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 4. The proposal complies with the Transfer of Development Rights per Section 3-1403; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMI3ER CARI,EN A. PETERSI?N, COUNCIIAIEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMA-riw ACTION EMPLOYER" August 22, 2005 Armstrong - Page 2 5. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That use of the property be for a maximum of 112 dwelling units, including eight units through the Transfer of Development Rights, and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units. The retail sales and services have been eliminated from the proposal; 3. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That occupancy by owners of units in the southern building be limited to sixty (60) days in any calendar year. Further, units in the southern building shall be offered or advertised as being available for rental to the public as overnight accommodations when not in use by the owner. At the request of the City Manager or designee, records of the rentals conducted for or by the owners of units shall be made available for examination to determine compliance with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines and/or any other enforcement afforded by City regulations. A license for the facility must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, shall be maintained. Units within this portion of the development shall not be used for any purpose other than overnight accommodations and shall not qualify for homestead exemption nor as a residential unit which can be used for voter registration, motor vehicle registration, Pinellas County public school registration or home or business occupational licenses; 5. That the sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 6. That all City approvals and easements necessary for the sidewalk connection to the sidewalk on City property to the north be obtained prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion; 7. That the applicant obtain all right-of-way, easements or other legal instruments prior to the issuance of building permits for the installation of any landscaping and irrigation on the City property north of the subject property; 8. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 9. That fencing within the visibility triangles and waterfront visibility triangles be brought into compliance with Code provisions prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. Fence height increases above that otherwise permitted and alternate fence materials shall only be allowed (1) in the waterfront visibility triangle if a letter of "no objection" is submitted from the adjacent condominium association board and (2) in the visibility triangle if acceptable to the Engineering Department; 10. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625-627 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625-627 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625-627 Bay August 22, 2005 Armstrong - Page 3 Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 11. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 12. That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 13. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 14. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 15. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 16. That all construction comply with FEMA requirements; 17. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 18. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (August 16, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-5023 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 30, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). , - & . I ? 0 0 August 22, 2005 Armstrong - Page 4 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Mich?ef?AI P Planning Director S:Oanning Department) CD BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished Applications) Gulfview S 0430 TV Residences (7) - Approve&Gulfview S430 Development Order.doc Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 5:04 PM To: Clayton, Gina; Akin, Pam Cc: Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: The following condition was recommended to be attached to our receipt of a development order from the City of Clearwater Beach: We are incorporating it into the recommendation for Wednesday. Wayne, please proceed accordingly. mld -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 4:38 PM To: Akin, Pam; Delk, Michael Cc: Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: The following condition was recommended to be attached to our receipt of a development order from the City of Clearwater Beach: Should we proceed with revising the conditions for the CDB meeting? -----Original Message----- From: Akin, Pam Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 2:58 PM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Cc: Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Ed Armstrong (E-mail) Subject: The following condition was recommended to be attached to our receipt of a development order from the City of Clearwater Beach: << File: AdamsMark condition.doc >> The language we discussed. • VI 'V • • Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 3:57 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: The following condition was recommended to be attached to our receipt of a development order from the City of Clearwater Beach: FYI -----Original Message----- From: Akin, Pam Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 2:58 PM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Cc: Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Ed Armstrong (E-mail) Subject: The following condition was recommended to be attached to our receipt of a development order from the City of Clearwater Beach: 9?_, AdamsMark condition.doc The language we discussed. . 1.'f • Occupancy by Owners of units in the Southern building shall be limited to sixty (60) days in any calendar year with Owner stays not to exceed thirty (30) consecutive days. Further, units in the Southern building shall be offered or advertised as being available for rental to the public as overnight accommodations when not in use by the Owner. At the request of the City Manager or designee, records of the rentals conducted for or by the Owners of units shall be made available for examination to determine compliance with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines and/or any other enforcement afforded by City regulations. A license for the facility must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, shall be maintained. Units within this portion of the development shall not be used for any purpose other than overnight accommodations and shall not qualify for homestead exemption nor as a residential unit which can be used for voter registration, motor vehicle registration, Pinellas County public school registration or home or business occupational licenses. Message • • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 8:00 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Revised D.O. Language - Adams Mark Wayne - Is this DO conditions substantially different than what you have proposed? mld -----Original Message----- From: Akin, Pam Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:11 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: FW: Revised D.O. Language - Adams Mark Michael, we need to discuss, I am not happy with this language. -----Original Message----- From: Ed Armstrong [mailto:EdA@jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:53 AM To: Akin, Pam Subject: FW: Revised D.O. Language - Adams Mark pam , proposed condo-hotel development order condition for your consideration. thanks, ed. -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Handlin [mailto:Jeff Hand lin@ us.taylorwoodrow.com] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:47 AM To: Ed Armstrong Cc: saulg@gtlaw.com; Marc Spencer; Stephanie Pleasant Subject: Revised D.O. Language - Adams Mark See attached the most recent revised version of the condition to the Development Order for the Adams Mark redevelopment, revised as of this morning. Jeffrey B. Handlin Regional Director of Acquisitions U.S. Tower Division Taylor Woodrow 877 Executive Center Drive Suite 205 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2474 Tel. 727-563-9882 Dir. 727-369-0629 Fax 727-563-9674 The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received this e-mail in error, please note that any review, retransmission, copying, distribution or other use of the e-mail is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please delete the material from any computer that may have it and contact mailto_Postmaster cr us.taylorwoodrow.com Thank you for your cooperation. 8/15/2005 ,,Message . • Page 2 of 2 The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system. We cannot accept liability for any damage you may sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. 8/15/2005 r__1 LA r1 U The following is a revision to the condition recommended to be included in the development order from the City of Clearwater Beach: Comment No. 68: Proposal intends the overnight accommodation rooms/units to be "condo-hotel." As such, provide the operational characteristics of the hotel. If approved, the following condition will be recommended: Occupancy by Owners shall be limited to ninety (90) days in any calendar year. Further, units in the Southern building shall be offered or advertised as being available for rental as overnight accommodations for a term of less than one (1) month, more than three (3) times in any consecutive twelve (12) month period. At the request of the City Manager or designee, records of the rentals conducted for or by the Owners of units shall be made available for examination to determine whether the length of stay complies with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines and/or any other enforcement afforded by City regulations. A license for the facility must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, shall be maintained. Within this portion of the development rooms/units shall not qualify for homestead exemption nor as a residential unit which can be used for voter registration, motor vehicle registration, Pinellas County public school registration or home or business occupational licenses. Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 4:40 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: Staff Reports for 8.16.05 CDB Jayne - Attached are the Staff Reports for 415 Island Way (Troy Perdue) and 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. (Ed Armstrong). Thanks for your help. Wayne Island Way 415 Gulfview S 0430 Staff Report fo... Staff Report (... JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III 13RUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON LEANNE LETIZE ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A.R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROYJ. PERDUE F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. AUDREY B. RAUCHWAY DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS PHILIP M. SHASTEEN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER August 5, 2005 Mr. David Gildersleeve Chairman Community Development Board c/o City of Clearwater Planning Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: FLD2005-0507 430 Gulfview Boulevard Dear David: FILE No. 45934.109561 The referenced case is scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board at its meeting of August 16, 2005. On behalf of the applicant, TW/Beach Residences-Clearwater, LLC, I respectfully request that the applicant be given additional time, up to 20 minutes, for its presentation at the meeting. Obviously, should this case be scheduled for consent agenda, we will waive the additional time. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, JOHNSON;-POPE, BOKOR, RUB 1151L & BURNS, LLP E. D. Armstrong III /I rc cc: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Esquire Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director Sue Diana, City Clerk's Office Mr. Jeff Handlin 352221 CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756-5643 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 VV I' ? u AUG - g 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI-_" OF CLEARWATER L TAMPA OFFICE 403 EAST MADISON STREET SUITE 400 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 3360 1-1100) TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-71 18 12rENGINEERS, LORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. Letter ofl Transmittal ORIGINAL 4 rt,_ 1 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Attn: Date: k3, Z?s Address: koo o? Re: From: Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Copies Date No. Description' These are Transmitted as Checked Below: ? For Approval ? For Your Signature El For your use El As Requested El Approved as noted ? Returned for Revision ? For Review and Comment ? Other: Comments: ?,J ?Z 7s o (.E,yn C-j) 6L"--&- Awne_- 'DR, F( ?' ? Please print name below and Signed: L/? M ? return via fax as having been received. Copy to: J-2Cf 1 a ?J'(7r,,.'* Ve, -? ORIGINAL T)? If enclosures are not as noted, kindly inform us at once Phone: (727) 849-7588 - Fax: (727) 848-3648 ENV7RONMENTALlSTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: J FAX: 9-f0 Z - 03 (os Phone: f & / ` 18 t 8 NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) ,3 FROM: Yom-- G) h Phone: .S (p Z- *J 01- DATE:_ Ul ?v SRE: )5?1? 2-oo J- - 0 S-0 4-7 43o r- Cj?1 M4A- i -. • 1 . 0 Aug. 08 2005 11:36AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94620365 Aug.08 11:34AM 01'28 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-BOO-HELP-FAX C435-7329). From: Jeff Handlin [Jeff.HandIin@us.taylorwoodrow.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 9:25 AM To: Rick Rollins; TRACEY.BRUCH@myclearwater.com Cc: scott.rice@myclearwater.com; Jayne E. Sears; hbooth@pgcla.com Subject: RE: Adams mark Please note that the layout with two (2) pay stations, as detailed in Rick Rollin's email, was included in those Landscape Plans submitted on Monday, July 11 th as part of the project's resubmittal package, addressing Staff's comments. The civil engineering plans included in the package did not reflect the two (2) pay station layout, are being corrected to reflect the same, and will be delivered to the City's offices today. Regards, Jeffrey B. Handlin Regional Director of Acquisitions U.S. Tower Division Taylor Woodrow 877 Executive Center Drive Suite 205 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2474 Tel. 727-563-9882 Dir. 727-369-0629 Fax 727-563-9674 U-n T1v f NN . ? . F ' ?I-;7 ?? tE. tv'T From: Rick Rollins [mailto:rrollins@pgcla.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 9:13 AM To: TRACEY.BRUCH@myclearwater.com Cc: scott.rice@myclearwater.com; Jeff Handlin; jayneS@jpfirm.com; hbooth@pgcla.com Subject: Adams mark 7/ 1 3/2005 Phil C'Irahan-i 1'i ?r?ts,ltip.; See attachment of resubmittal design for Adam's Mark. The civil plans from FDC currently do not reflect the design on our landscape plans. FDC will be resubmitting for consistency. As per review comments we have added an additional pay station and removed Adam's Mark garage access from the public parking lot. There will still be a ticket dispenser for parking entry and payment verification. Please review and comment as necessary. Richard Rollins Landscape Architect Phil Graham & Company, P.A. 436 Second Street North St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727.821.5225 Voice 727.826.1626 Facsimile www..pgcla.com 7/13/2005 Jayne E. Sears From: Rick Rollins [rrollins@pgcla.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 9:13 AM To: TRACEY.BRUCH@myclearwater.com Cc: scott.rice@myclearwater.com; jeff.handlin@us.taylorwoodrow.com; Jayne E. Sears; hbooth@pgcla.com Subject: Adams mark 1'111 (-1'r. hall'I. & t:()I-II paII',', PA. L i b,ir See attachment of resubmittal design for Adam's Mark. The civil plans from FDC currently do not reflect the design on our landscape plans. FDC will be resubmitting for consistency As per review comments we have added an additional pay station and removed Adam's Mark garage access from the public parking lot. There will still be a ticket dispenser for parking entry and payment verification. Please review and comment as necessary. Richard Rollins Landscape Architect Phil Graham & Company, P.A. 436 Second Street North St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727.821.5225 Voice 727.826.1626 Facsimile www.pgcla.com 7/13/2005 CCCL E VISIBILITY ANGLES SIDEWALK K PARKING A 0 0 Javne E. Sears From: Jayne E. Sears Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 1:03 PM _ To: Wayne Wells (wayne.wells@clearwater-fl.com) _ - f 1 Cc: Jeff Handlin ; O Cabrera; Ed Armstrong Subject: FLD2005-05047- 430 S. Gulfview; F j?ata i SFX4526.pdf(95 KB) may- CI_t-ARVVt Attached for your file is justification for drainage vault provided by FDC to Scott Rice. I will bring you a copy for your file. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 1 W IV OUO. 9W IU: DL PAA IV 6046. 0 f To: Scott Rice FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS' INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTAUST2% SURVEYORS & PLANNERS From: Octavio Cabrera, P.E. WJ' UU11m Company: Date: July 13, 2005 Fax: 562-4755 JobNo.: 699-271-10.01 Phone: Pages: 3 Adams Mark JeffHandlin - 563-9674 Re: V Jayne Sears - 441-5617 Hardcopy instructions: ? Regular Mail ® Ovemight IMaill © Nacre To Follow a Comments: The brformation contelned In thin tf ansmtssion Is privileged and cmfidentlat. It IS Intended for the Use of the Individual or entity, named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended addressee, the reader is hereby notified that any consideration. dissemination or duplicallon of thls oommunloation Is Wetly prohibited. If the recipient has received this communication in error, please rettm this tansmission to us at tho address belowby mad. IF this communication was received in the U.S., please notify us immediately by phone. 'T'HANK YOui PhMe: (727) 84e-75$8- Fay (7'27) 8483648 VI I II)I I.Ma TYPIV 1u: atl r8A I L 1 00040 , im UUCi uutl PRORIDA DESIGN CONSU1TAAliB INC. Civil Ling; neering - Surveying - Truisportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planing • Environmental • Landscape At Ilmaure LC-26000206 July 12, 2005 Mr. Scott Rice, P.E. City of Clearwater Public Works - Engineering 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2°d Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment FLD 2005-05047 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. "Justification for Use of Drainage Vault" Dcar Scott: The purpose of this letter is to provide justification for the use of the proposed underground drainage vault, in lieu of the more standard surface treatment facility. Our justification is as follows: 1. Existing hotel has no stormwater system whatsoever, thus, any treatment would be a noticeable improvement. 2. The proposed development (as allowed by the existing zoning) is an intense use of the site. The pervious area proposed (outside the main structure) are being used mainly for landscaping, to buffer the adjoining vehicular use areas. 3. The proposed vault would be located under the ramp leading to the 26d parking level. As such, the vault will have headroom ranging from 4 ft. d_ to 14 ft. t. (9 ft., average). This allows for access from the ground level double doors (See sheet 12 of 13 of the Site Plan). Furthermore, the vault will be lighted and ventilated to provide a better environment for maintenance operations. 4. The proposed treatment method within the vault is sand filtration. The filter has been designed (in conformance with City of Clearwater Drainage Criteria) to restore the treatrnenit volume in less than 24 hours. By providing for rapid discharge, the chance of the water becoming stagnant has been eliminated. 3030 Starkey Boulevard - New Port Ridicy, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 - Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (300) 532-1047 www.fldeslgn.com w111011 4UUU HGII Mild NIA rcr 09040 Mr. Scott Rice, P.E. July 12, 2005 Page 2 0 44J UUJ/UUJ 5. The proposed maintenance schedule (to be provided prior to building permit) will call for regular inspection of the vault, filter and outflow control structure to ensure maximum efficiency. 6. The anticipated pollutant load is minimal. The runoff collection system calls for only roof areas and the fourth (4th) level amenities to contribute to the vault. 7. Any accidental oil/grease spillage within the parking areas will be routed to the proposed oillgrease separator prior to flow into the vault. It is my professional opinion that the proposed design and operation of the stormwater system for the Adams Mark Redevelopmeot would guarantee that the quality of the discharge meet or exceed the water quality from a stanudard treatment pond. We respectfully request your approval of the vault system proposed for this project Sincerely, Octavio Cabrera., P.E. Senior Project Manager :c Jeff Handlin,, Taylor Woodrow Acquisitions Edward Armstrong, Johnson-Pope Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., FDC File 699-271-10.01 :cp&AAdams Marklirttcm\rIcc.doo FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental • Landscape Architecture LC-26000206 July 12, 2005 Mr. Scott Rice, P.E. City of Clearwater Public Works - Engineering 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment FLD 2005-05047 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. "Justification for Use of Drainage Vault" Dear Scott: V JUL 1 4 2005 _ CITY OF CLEARWATFR I The purpose of this letter is to provide justification for the use of the proposed underground drainage vault, in lieu of the more standard surface treatment facility. Our justification is as follows: 1. Existing hotel has no stormwater system whatsoever, thus, any treatment would be a noticeable improvement. 2. The proposed development (as allowed by the existing zoning) is an intense use of the site. The pervious area proposed (outside the main structure) are being used mainly for landscaping, to buffer the adjoining vehicular use areas. The proposed vault would be located under the ramp leading to the 2nd parking level. As such, the vault will have headroom ranging from 4 ft. ± to 14 ft. t. (9 ft., average). This allows for access from the ground level double doors (See sheet 12 of 13 of the Site Plan). Furthermore, the vault will be lighted and ventilated to provide a better environment for maintenance operations. 4. The proposed treatment method within the vault is sand filtration. The filter has been designed (in conformance with City of Clearwater Drainage Criteria) to restore the treatment volume in less than 24 hours. By providing for rapid discharge, the chance of the water becoming stagnant has been eliminated. 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 9 Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com fJU. k LJ JUL 1 5 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Mr. Scott Rice, P.E. July 12, 2005 Page 2 5. The proposed maintenance schedule (to be provided prior to building permit) will call for regular inspection of the vault, filter and outflow control structure to ensure maximum efficiency. 6. The anticipated pollutant load is minimal. The runoff collection system calls for only roof areas and the fourth (4th) level amenities to contribute to the vault. 7. Any accidental oil/grease spillage within the parking areas will be routed to the proposed oil/grease separator prior to flow into the vault. It is my professional opinion that the proposed design and operation of the stormwater system for the Adams Mark Redevelopment would guarantee that the quality of the discharge meet or exceed the water quality from a standard treatment pond. We respectfully request your approval of the vault system proposed for this project. Sincerely, Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Senior Project Manager :c Jeff Handlin, Taylor Woodrow Acquisitions Edward Armstrong, Johnson-Pope Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., FDC File 699-271-10.01 :cpK:Wdams MarkTettersVice.doc 07/13/2005 WED 10:50 FAX 727 3648 ? X002/003 t I ?WW II, :. MII?N:n .'.: I MIMU c lEit.r fIORIDA DESIGN(MY1TAWS, INC. Civil Engineering Surveying • Tr=sporcauun Planning & Rngincering • Land Planning • Lnvironmencal Landscape Arcluceccure LC-26000206 July 12, 2005 Mr. Scott Rice, P.E. City of Clearwater Public Works - Engineering 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment FLD 2005,05047 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. "Justification for Use of Drainage Vault" Dear Scott: The purpose of this letter is to provide justification for the use of the proposed underground drainage vault, in lieu of the more standard surface treatment facility. Our justification is as follows: 1. Existing hotel has no stormwater system whatsoever, thus, any treatment would be a noticeable improvement. 2. The proposed development (as allowed by the existing zoning) is an intense use of the site. The pervious area proposed (outside the main structure) are being used mainly for landscaping, to buffer the adjoining vehicular use areas. 3. The proposed vault would be located under the ramp leading to the 2r"d parking level. As such, the vault will have headroom ranging from 4 ft. ± to 14 ft. ±. (9 ft., average). This allows for access from the ground level double doors (See sheet 12 of 13 of the Site Plan). Furthermore, the vault will be lighted and ventilated to provide a better environment for maintenance operations. 4. The proposed treatment method within the vault is sand filtration. The filter has been designed (in conformance with City of Clearwater Drainage Criteria) to restore the treatment volume in less than 24 hours. By providing for rapid discharge, the chance of the water becoming stagnant has been eliminated. 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port. RiC:ttry, FL M655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: 0727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www,fidesign.coni 07/13/2005 QED 10.50 FAX 727 3648 • ?J003/003 r Mr. Scott Rice, P.E. July 12, 2005 Page 2 5. The proposed maintenance schedule (to be provided prior to building permit) will call for regular inspection of the vault, filter and outflow control structure to ensure maximum efficiency. 6. The anticipated pollutant load is minimal. The runoff collection system calls for only roof areas and the fourth (4`h) level amenities to contribute to the vault. 7. Any accidental oil/grease spillage within the parking areas will be routed to the proposed oil/grease separator prior to flow into the vault. It is my professional opinion that the proposed design and operation of the stormwater system for the Adams Mark Redevelopment would guarantee that the quality of the discharge meet or exceed the water quality from a standard treatment pond. We respectfully request your approval of the vault system proposed for this project. Sincerely, Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Senior Project Manager :c , Jeff Handliu, Taylor Woodrow Acquisitions Edward Armstrong, Johnson-Pope Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., FDC File 699-271-10.01 :cpK:lAdams MarkU.cttcis\ricc.doc JUL 11 2005 RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS TW/BEACH RESIDENCES - CLEARWATER, LLC PLANNING DEPARTMED2005-05047 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGI Planning staff, please note that the applicant purchased the property on June 3, 2005, subsequent to the submittal of the applications. The comprehensive infill application and TDR applications have been revised to reflect the new owner. A copy of the deed and affidavit to authorize agent, executed by the owner, are attached to the comprehensive infill application. GENERAL ENGINEERING: All of the following to be addressed prior to CDB; Comment No. 1: Southern driveway apron shall not extend beyond extended side property line. Response No. 1: Radius has been deleted. We are now proposing a simple taper at the existing curb. Comment No. 2: Brick paver driveway aprons not consistent with Beach Walk template. Response No. 2: Please see note on plan for driveway aprons to match Beach Walk paver color and pattern. Comment No. 3: Proposed sidewalk shall include 4x8 concrete paver band as shown on Beach Walk Sheet No. HD-11. Conduits or sleeves shall be installed beneath these pavers to provide for irrigation and/or electric power. Response No. 3: Conduits/sleeves will be shown on final irrigation and lighting plans. Comment No. 4: Palm trees shall be installed in the ROW in accordance with Beach Walk Sheet Nos. LS-2 and LS-3. Response No. 4: Palms are shown to match Beach Walk design on landscape plans. Comment No. 5: Proposed modifications to City parking lot would impact City irrigation system. Response No. 5: The. applicant will coordinate with the City regarding limited redesign of enhancements to the surface public parking area. A limited area of improved landscaping on City property is RECENED JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OP C"LP p\h1& TC L Comment No. 6: Response No. 6: • • ORIGINAL. proposed with the understanding that the applicant will assume responsibility for irrigation of the enhanced landscaping. The applicant will apply for a right-of-way utilization permit to the extent required for such landscaping. All landscaping/hardscaping shall be coordinated with Beach Walk design. Landscaping and hardscaping are coordinated with the Beach Walk design. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: Comment No. 1: Applicant shall obtain a separate right-of-way permit for the brick paver driveway and driveways shall be constructed in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #113. Response No. 1: Noted. Comment No. 2: Need to show all city details applicable to this project. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www.myclearwater.com/engineer, go to "Documents and Publications", then to Engineering Construction Standards, then select the applicable details. Response No. 2: Noted. Comment No. 3: Need to install a gate valve on both sides of proposed backflow device(s). Response No. 3: Noted. Comment No. 4: Street lateral manhole connection and cleanout shall be installed in compliance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Indices #302 and #304 respectively. Response No. 4: Noted. ENVIRONMENTAL: General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Comment No. 1: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically 2 A • ORIGINAL 4 approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. Response No. 1: We will provide justification to Engineering and request their approval for a vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. Response No. 2: Noted. We will comply with the request to provide an oil and grease separator. Please see sheet 7 of 13. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Response No. 3: A cross-section of the vault is shown on the drainage details sheet (Sheet 12 of 13). 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Response No. 4: Noted. A maintenance schedule shall be prepared and submitted at the time of building permit request. Comment No. 5: Please submit sea turtle friendly lighting design and installation details prior to building permit. (per Development Code; Section 3-1302-d and City Or. 6928-02) Response No. 5: Sea turtle friendly lighting will be designed for this site. FIRE: Comment No. 1: This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Response No. 1: Noted. Comment No. 2: Show on the plan fire hydrant(s) within 300 ft of the most remote point of the building, as the hose is laid. Due to the dimensions of the building(s) more than one hydrant may be necessary. Please respond to `this comment PRIOR TO CDB. RECEIVED JUL 11 2005 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 ORIGINAL Response No. 2: Additional fire hydrants have been provided to satisfy aforementioned requirement. Please refer to the Utilities Plan (Sheet10 of 13). Comment No. 3: Any ramps over vaults which fire or emergency vehicles might be expected to travel must be designed to HS-25 specifications. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 3: There are no ramps or vaults over which fire or emergency vehicles will have to travel. Comment No. 4: Building(s) to be protected by NFPA-13 fire sprinkler system. FDC must be at least 15 ft off the building and within 40 of the hydrant dedicated to the fire sprinkler system. Due to the size and dimensions of the proposed building(s) more than the one hydrant shown may be necessary. If there is to be more than one sprinkler system, an FDC and hydrant dedicated to the sprinkler system are required. Please respond and provide additional information PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 4: Complete fire protection using NFPA-13 is agreed. Comment No. 5: Provide a standpipe water supply with 21/2 inch adaptor with breakable cover and chain within 100 feet of any pier/land intersection. As per NFPA-303. Please respond to this comment and show rear hydrant on the plans PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 5: This comment does not apply to the project as no piers or docks are proposed. Comment No. 6: Note: From the preliminary plans submitted for this DRC site plan review, the proposed building appears to be a high rise and will be required to meet the requirements of the high rise package including but not limited to fire command room, voice evacuation fire alarm, pressurized stairwells, enclosed elevator lobbies, fire fighter phones, etc. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 6: All requirements stated herein are agreed and will be provided. Comment No. 7: All drain. covers and grates in drive aisles must meet the requirements of HS-20 specifications. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. RECEIVED JUL 11 2005 -4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEA?RWATE+R 0 * ORIGINAL Response No. 7: Noted. All traffic bearing structures are required to be designed to HS-20 specs. Comment No. 8: Clearance of 7'/2 feet in front of and to the sides of each fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 8: Noted. This requirement has been added as a note on the Utilities Plan (Sheet 10 of 13). Additionally, the Landscape Plans have been revised to address the clearance requirement. Comment No. 9: Clearance of 7'/2 feet to the front, sides and rear of each FDC are required to be maintained. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 9: Noted. This requirement has been added as a note on the Utilities Plan (Sheet 10 of 13). Comment No. 10: 6/27/05 Fire command room shall be above BFE (base flood elevation). Response No. 10: Fire command room is on Level 2. Comment No. 11: 6/27/05 Provide FDC for Standpipe, Response No. 11: This is included and agreed. RECEIVED HARBOR MASTER: No issues JUL 11 2005 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT LEGAL: CITY OF CLEARWAY No issues. LAND RESOURCES: Comment No. 1: The tree survey and inventory is incomplete. There is a row of trees behind tree numbers 21 through 40. Include these trees prior to Building Permit. Response No. 1: Noted. Please see revised tree inventory. LANDSCAPING: Comment No. 1: Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along 5 0 * ORIGINAL the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Show such curbing on Sheet 3/13 and the landscaping plans, with details, for the driveways on the north and east, including the south side of the taxi parking spaces. Response No. 1: Such details are shown on the revised landscape plans for walks and drive entrances. Comment No. 2: Provide a landscape plan for the landscaping on the ground level and a separate landscape plan for the landscaping on the platform level, as it is very difficult to review what is on the platform above versus on the ground, especially in regard to the height. of trees in relation to building overhangs. Response No. 2: The plan has been split into two sheets called L-2A and L-213. Comment No. 3: Unclear as to note on Sheet L-2 stating "no planting improvements seaward of the CCCL line west of the building." Plans indicate plantings within the CCCL on the north side, if it is a concern. However, there is no Code restriction on plantings within the CCCL. Response No. 3: CCCL notes have been removed. Comment No. 4: Indicate the location of sod on Sheet L-2 and provide construction details for such. Response No. 4: Sod locations are shown on the plan between the seawall and adjacent sidewalk. Comment No. 5: Landscape improvements, including irrigation, is proposed on City property to the north. Who will maintain and whose irrigation is it that is proposed on our property (Adam's Mark irrigation or ours)? Provide explanation/details. Response No. 5: The applicant will coordinate with the City regarding limited redesign of enhancements to the surface public parking area. A limited area of improved landscaping on City property is proposed with the understanding that the applicant will assume responsibility for irrigation of the enhanced landscaping. The applicant will apply for a right-of-way utilization permit to the extent required for such landscaping. RECEIVED JUL 11 2005 6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r ORIGINAL Comment No. 6: Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Dimension the depth from the front property line of the landscaped areas east of the retail/lobby area and either side of the fountain on the north portion. These areas will be counted toward the foundation landscaping requirement. Response No. 6: Landscaping meets or exceeds City Code. PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1: Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727- 562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 1: Noted. STORMWATER: Comment No. 1: Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide a copy of approved SWFWMD permit or exemption to Development Services. Response No. 1: Noted. SOLID WASTE: Comment No. 1: Too many units for roll out service. The hotel will produce much more waste than the condos please consider a compactor for your solid waste needs. Response No. 1: After discussion with City Solid Waste, we are including a small compactor at each trash chute area. In addition, recycling at each trash holding area, therefore one large area is not required. REK'---;"SVED 7 JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1?.J TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: • ORIGINA1, Comment No. 1: The proposed northern driveway and resulting modifications to the City parking lot exit would negatively impact the operation of the City lot and shall not be permitted. The proposed modifications involve the loss of one of the existing pay stations. A motorist wishing to enter the development parking lot would be required to enter the City lot, take a pay ticket and circle the lot to gain access to the development lot. The City lot is closed at certain times (lot full-nights) thereby eliminating access to the development lot. Response No. 1: As discussed at the DRC meeting, the applicant has decided to eliminate the northern driveway in order to make the northern side of the property into more of a plaza area and City staff concurs with this decision. Please see the revised plans. Comment No. 2: How will proposed gates be operated? Response No. 2: This is no longer applicable as the northern driveway/gate access is being eliminated. Comment No. 3: Are the public spaces going to be free or metered? If metered please show parking meters or a means of payment. Response No. 3: Not applicable. Please refer to the response to Comment No. 1. Comment No. 4: The vertical clear height of parking garage must be 82". Show a cross section of parking garage showing pipes and other structures that may impede in this height requirement. Response No. 4: This is shown already and agreed. Comment No. 5: The covered hotel drop off area must meet ADA requirements of 114 inches clear vertical height. Response No. 5: This slab above is raised to make 9'6" clearance at hotel drop off only. Comment No. 6: H/C parking spaces must be strategically placed to nearest accessible entrance i.e. elevators. Response No. 6: All paths are convenient and accessible and this is shown by crosshatch or walk. RECEVE7% .JUL 112005 s PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITV OF CLEARwATER 0 • ' ORIGINAL Comment No. 7: Remove walls that impede motorists line of sight when backing out of parking spaces. Response No. 7: These lines are not walls, they are paint strip indicators. No walls or columns impede view. Comment No. 8: Spacing between driveways must be a minimum of 125'. (Community Development Code Section 3-102.D.1.) Response No. 8: We have revised the comprehensive infill application to seek relief from this requirement. The Code also states to use existing curb cuts on arterials which we do, and the location of those drives improve circulation for vehicles and allows the pedestrian courtyard feature. Comment No. 9: Where will moving vans and trucks stage when loading or unloading large household items? Response No. 9: Loading area is shown on south side of building. Comment No. 10: Where will delivery trucks stage for commercial/retail deliveries? Response No. 10: Loading area is shown on south side of building. Comment No. 11: Provide a diagram showing a standard passenger car (18' long) making the turns at all corners of the parking garage and porte-cochere. The turning vehicle must not encroach in the opposing lane. Response No. 11: The garage meets all codes and standards of parking garage circulation. It is different from parking lot. It is not possible to make turns without encroaching on the opposing lane. We will recommend the installation of mirrors to allow drivers to spot oncoming traffic. Comment No. 12: Demonstrate accessible path from public sidewalk to the site's accessible entrance and from building A to building B. Response No. 12: The crosshatched path is shown. Comment No. 13: Civil Site Plan Sheet 3 of 13 indicates columns obstructing the south drive aisle. This drive aisle shall be 24'-wide and clear of obstructions. RECHVED JUL 11 2005 9 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C17V OF CLEARWATER ?? o ORIGINAL Response No. 13: These columns were show in error due to an overlay of plans. This has been corrected on the revised plans. PLANNING: All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O. Noted. Comment No. 1: Under the prior application FLD2005-01005, the site data indicated the lot area to be 106,500 square feet (2.444 acres), with 81,017 square feet of upland (1.859 acres) zoned Tourist (T) and 25,483 square feet of submerged land (0.585 acre) zoned Open Space/Recreation (OS/R).Under the present application, the site data indicates the lot area to be 97,574 square feet (2.239 acres, but stated on the Site Plan as 2.45 acres) and 81,450 square feet of upland (1.869 acres). Revise the lot area acreage on the Cover sheet. Response No. 1: Comment No. 2: Response No. 2 Comment No. 3: Response No. 3: Unclear as to the reduction in the overall lot area by 8,926 square feet (which appears to be in submerged land)? Need to correct the overall lot acreage if the 97,574 square feet is correct. Also unclear why in the Legal Description on the Cover Sheet the land area is indicated as 106,504.22 square feet, which is not listed anywhere else on the site data. The, correct lot area is 106,504 sq. ft. (2.45 acres). The Land Use Data Table on the cover sheet has been revised. Show or indicate the location equipment and all required 201(D_(i) and Index #701). n of all outside mechanical screening (per Section 3- There is no outside equipment building or parking structure. It is all located within the Show or indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. Noted. Lighting development plan to follow prior to building permit. RECHVBID-'? JUL 11 2005 10 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • ORIGINAL Comment No. 4: Provide the floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses as part of the land use data on Civil cover sheet. Response No. 4: Retail uses total 2,910 square feet (FAR 0.04). This is shown on the Density Table on the Cover Sheet. The retail is comprised of the 1,350 square foot retail area in the lobby and 1,560 square feet for kiosks (3). Comment No. 5: Revise the Landscape Plan Sheet L-1 to show sight visibility triangles according to Code requirements. Response No. 5: Noted. Site triangles are shown on the revised plans. Comment No. 6: A Comprehensive Landscape Program has been submitted, but has not detailed what requirements of the Code are being asked to be modified or waived. There are no landscape buffers or interior landscape area required by this proposal. Advise as to the reason for the submittal or remove the application. Response No. 6: The proposed landscaping meets or exceeds Code. We withdraw the Comprehensive Landscape Program application. Comment No. 7: A letter has been submitted as to the color scheme proposed. On the building elevations, please indicate the different Areas 1-3 so there is no confusion as to the Areas proposed. Response No. 7: This is included in the revised plans. Comment No. 8: Provide color samples/chips of the proposed exterior building colors. Response No. 8: Paint chips are included with this resubmittal. Comment No. 9: Based on the acreage submitted FLD2005-01009 of 0.259 acres (11,2° produces only seven dwelling units i du/acre), revise the TDR application c of site" and "number of development site" for the sender site. Note: Undc sender site was approved for five dwelling units. Response No. 9: Noted and revised on resubmitted TDR application for 665 Bay Esplanade (sender). Comment No. 10: Revise Page 2 of the TDR application for 667 Bay Esplanade (sender site) to show the "site of site" as 0.269 R E (1 40 E ? V E 11; 01114 11 JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • i ORIGINAL. acre and the number of "development rights allocated to this site" as eight dwelling units. Response No. 10: Noted and revised on resubmitted TDR application for 667 Bay Esplanade (sender). Comment No. 11: Revise the proposed density on the Cover Sheet to provide the residential density (113 dwelling units), the overnight accommodation density (78 rooms) and the floor area ratio (for the 2,910 square-foot retail portion). Response No. 11: The Density Table on the cover sheet has been revised to match the City's calculations. Comment No. 12: Recommend providing two parking spaces per dwelling unit. Response No. 12: The applicant has met and exceeded Code parking requirements. Comment No. 13: Pursuant to Section 3-905.A, setbacks shall be measured from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). Provide the proposed rear (west) and side (north) setbacks in the Land Use Data table on the Cover Sheet and on Sheet 3/13/ Provide complete justification why measurement from the CCCL cannot be complied with and the complete justification as to how this proposed reductions will not "adversely affect the safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood" (General Applicability criteria #3) and "redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviation" (Comp Infill criteria #1) and how "flexibility in regard to...required setbacks ...are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity" (Comp Infill criteria #8). Response No. 13: Setbacks from the CCCL have been shown on the Land Use Data Table on the cover sheet. Comment No. 14: Provide proposed setbacks to the tower outline on Sheet 3/13 and the Land Use Data table on the Cover Sheet. Response No. 14: The requested setbacks have been shown on Sheet 3 of 13 and on the Land Use Data Table on the cover sheet. Comment No. 15: Provide/show on all appropriate sheets, including landscaping, the required egress sidewalk from the doors on the west side to the public way, as required by the Building Code. ?COVED 12 JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITV OF CLFAPWATI=Q • • ORIGINAL Response No. 15: This is shown on the revised plans. Comment No. 16: Site plan and Landscape plan sheets place the front of the building and South Gulfview Blvd. on the right side of the sheet. Revise the architectural plans to have the same orientation. Response No. 16: It will not be possible to comply with this request in time for resubmittal. The consultants have noted the comment and will attempt to comply on future submittals. Comment No. 17: Provide parking stall counts per floor on the Cover Sheet. Note in the Land Use Data table that two of the parking spaces proposed are dedicated to taxis. Response No. 17: The requested information has been added to the Land Use Data Table on the cover sheet. A note has been added to state that two (2) spaces are dedicated to taxis. Comment No. 18: Provide the width of the sidewalk along the south side of the property. Response: Noted. Shown on revised plans. Unclear why this sidewalk must be placed in the center of this 15-foot wide area such that it breaks up the landscape area to provide meaningful and cohesive landscaping. Revise or provide justification. Response: The sidewalk is. placed at this location to create a sense of a secure space. It is not intrusive along the ground level of the building and it is not close to the seawall. Also unclear why, as shown on Sheet L-1, that this walkway needs to be constructed of pavers, since this is the access to roll dumpsters out to the trash staging area. Pavers create more noise when rolling the dumpsters. This also includes the trash staging area and the driveway to it (shown on Sheet L-1). Revise Response: The roll out dumpster area has been changed to a broom finish concrete. The walkway will remain pavers to help emphasize the sense of place. Comment No. 19: Unclear why a gate is proposed on. the north side of the Level 1 parking. Provide justification or remove. RECHVED 13 JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • * ORIGINAL Response No. 19: This is no longer applicable as the northern driveway/gate access is being eliminated. Comment No. 20: Unclear why there is a paved area on the north side west of the driveway from the City parking lot, that is indicated on Sheet L-1 for "retail" when there is no retail floor area in this location. Provide complete details as the operational aspects of this area or remove. Response No. 20: This is no longer applicable as the northern driveway/gate access is being eliminated. Comment No. 21: Provide the square footage of the retail space on Level 1 on Sheet 3/13. Response No. 21: The requested square footage of retail has been shown on Sheet 3 of 13. Comment No. 22: Columns shown on Sheet 3/13 north of taxi parking spaces impede drive aisle and produce a drive aisle less than Code required width of 24 feet. Revise. Response No. 22: These columns were shown in error due to an overlay of plans. This has been corrected on the revised plans. Comment No. 23: Sheet 3/13 indicates three kiosks. Provide complete details to purpose and design. Response No. 23: The kiosks will have roofs, partition walls and roll-down enclosures. All retail displays will be contained in the enclosed kiosk area. Comment No. 24: Sheet L-1 indicates a "covered retail area" (east) and "specialty paved retail plaza" (two locations, north and east). Provide complete details as to proposal with all operational characteristics, including square footage of each area. If so desired, must request "outdoor retail sales, display and/or storage" as a use (see Commercial District, Table 2-703 and criteria under 2-703.L), also providing all required parking. Response No. 24: The kiosks will have roofs, partition walls and roll-down enclosures. All retail displays will be contained in the enclosed kiosk area. Comment No. 25: Landscaping shown on Sheet L-2 on the northeast corner of the property does not take into account the utility and fire department requirements, as shown on Sheet 10/13. RECHVE1% 14 JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • • ORIGINAL Coordinate proposed landscaping with these needs/requirements. Response No. 25: Noted. Key elements are shown. See the engineering plans for additional information regarding the utilities. Comment No. 26: Sheet 3/13 - The legend indicates a dashed line as the "tower outline( floor 4 and up),however, there is a dashed line approximately 20 feet back from and parallel with S. Gulfview Blvd. that appears to conflict with the line as intended to show. Advise/revise. Response No. 26: The line types have been revised so that there should be no confusion between "tower outline" and "setback line". Comment No. 27: Sheets 3/13 and L-2 - Are there outdoor lights proposed along the seawall? There are what appears to be light symbols indicated (ghosted in). If provided, unclear as to need. Advise/remove or show as proposed lighting (no ghosting). Response No. 27: These are currently existing light fixtures which were inadvertently shown based on the survey. They have been removed from Sheets 3/13 and L-2 and are not intended to remain on the site. Comment No. 28: Revise Sheet A1.01 in Building Area Tabulations for condo parking, as the required amount (as indicated on the Cover Sheet for civil plans) is 170 spaces (not 113). Response No. 28: This is shown. Comment No. 29: Proposal is for 113 dwelling units, which is one too many dwelling units. Revise Cover Sheet for civil plans and Sheet A1.01. See calculation below: Mixed Use Calculation for Adams Mark Property - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR = 1.0 and maximum density = 30 du/acre) 1. Permitted FAR 2. Building square footage of non-residential portion 3. Lot area required to support 15 1.0 2,910 sf REILCUIVE7? JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEP„gaMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 ORIGINAL non-residential use in the building = 2,910 sf 4. Lot area of upland 81,450 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non-residential use in the building (#A3) 2,910 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units = 78,540 sf 7. Divide #A6 78,540 sf 8. Land area in an acre _ 43,560 sf 9. lot acreage = 1.803 acres 10. Multiply lot acreage 1.803 acres 11. Maximum density 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling, units permitted = 54 du B. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) 1. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted 54 du 2. Multiply by maximum transfer of 20% of #131 x 0.2 3. Maximum number of du to be transferred in to this property = 10 du C. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA) 217 rooms IT% RECIV E VE (Terminated through FLD2005-01005) 2. Subtract new OVA rooms /units - 78 rooms JUL 11 2005 3. Remaining OVA rooms/units 139 pLMNINGDEPARTMENT 4. Conversion of OVA to dwelling CHyOFCLEA EN units (40/30 rule) 104 du 5. Add in TDR (#133) 10 du 16 • 6. Total number of dwelling units allowable 7. Divide #A3 8. By land area to support 1 dwelling unit (43,560 sf _ 30 du/acre) 9. Number of dwelling units = to #A2 ORIGINA L = 114 du 2,910 sf 1,452 sf 2 du 10. Subtract #C9 from #C6 for Maximum Number of Dwelling Units In conjunction with Commercial Floor area (#A2) 112 du Response No. 29: The applicant has noted this comment and reduced the proposed number of residential dwelling units to 112, as reflected on the revised site data table and the revised TDR application for 627 Bay Esplanade, which has been revised to request the transfer of one residential dwelling unit (rather than 2 units). Comment No. 30: Parking calculations on the Cover Sheet for civil plans indicate that a total of 263 spaces are required for the proposed retail, condo dwellings and hotel rooms. However, on Sheet A2.01 indicates 23 public parking spaces. With only 277 total spaces being provided (which includes two spaces dedicated to taxis), unclear how 23 spaces are above and beyond the required parking for this site. Provide explanation. Response No. 30: The required parking is 261 spaces (7 H/C). The proposed parking is 274 spaces (10 H/C) and includes the two (2) taxi- designated spaces. Comment No. 31: Sheet A2.01 indicates a "sundeck" on the west side of the building, however, it appears to be inside the walls of the building. Provide explanation. If outside, revise all appropriate civil, landscape and architectural plans for the ground level to indicate such open area and to indicate how this area is accessed. Response No. 31: The notation of a sundeck has been removed. Comment No. 32: Provide the square footages of all of the attached dwelling (condominium) units (including the villas) and all of the hotel rooms. R E K--:? 17 JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CIEARWATEP ORIGINAL Response No. 32: These are shown on each sheet. Comment No. 33: Level 4 - Single hotel unit within, and accessed solely through, the club amenity area seems out of place. Explain. Response No. 33: This is a desirable special unit for the guest wanting to be near the public amenities. Comment No. 34: Unit count on the civil plans Cover Sheet (11 units) and as indicated on elevations on Sheet A3.01, there are hotel units on Level 11. However, there are no hotel units indicated on Level 11 on Sheet A2.06. Explain. Response No. 34: This is correct. The levels of the hotel are different from residence. Comment No. 35: Sheet A2.07 - There is a trellis proposed on the roof south of Unit G on Level 12. What is the purpose of the trellis, as there does not appear to be any access by Unit G to use this trellis or roof area? Response: A door. is added to access this small terrace. Also, this roof area south of Unit G is indicated as "roof below" where it is actually the roof of Unit H on Level 11, at the same level as Level 12. Revise. Response: This is revised. Comment No. 36: Sheet A2.08 - Unclear as to the purpose of the "loggia" east of Unit C for both Levels 14 & 15. Explain Response No. 36: To give detail to the elevation, articulation of the top. Comment No. 37: Dimensions and depictions to the sides of the elevations on Sheets A.3.01, A3.02, ?A3.03 and A3.04 do not line up with the elevations themselves, as the floor levels go through windows. Correct/revise for all sheets. Ensure correctness to scale of drawings. Response No. 37: Scale is absolutely correct, graphics of drawing improved. Comment No. 38: Elevations on Sheets A3.01 and A3.02 indicate something different on the south sides of Levels 12 and 13 than what the floor plans indicate (trellis or enclosed area??). Revise/make consistent. 14 M Response No. 38: This is corrected. RBCMTVE? JUL 11 2005 18 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CL.EARWATER • • ORIGINAL Comment No. 39: The parapets dimensioned on Sheets A3.01 through A3.04 are not accurate at 2'-6" (much higher). Provide correct dimensions. Response No. 39: The parapet is 2'-6". Some other wall space is made to conceal mechanical equipment within the allowable 16'2" for elevation overrun and mechanical equipment. Comment No. 40: Sheet A3.03 - Elevation is inaccurate as to height of area east of Unit C on Level 15 (building area of elevator/stairs need to go one floor higher). Revise. Response No. 40: This is revised. Comment No. 41: Sheet A3.04 indicates windows, balconies and other features on Levels 11 through 15 that are not indicated on the floor plans. Revise and/or explain. Response No. 41: This is revised. Comment No. 42: Revise Exhibit B of the application to correct the number of proposed condominium dwelling units (112 dwellings). Include the outdoor retail sales, display and storage use with its proposed square footage. Response No. 42: Noted. See revised Exhibit B. Comment No. 43: Revise Exhibit B - Termination of nonconforming status is not necessary, as this was approved under FLD2005-01005. Remove as part of the request. Note: The proposal includes the conversion of these overnight accommodation units to dwelling units. Response No. 43: Through discussions with planning staff, we have determined it is appropriate to request the termination of nonconforming status and the request remains a part of the application. Comment No. 44: Amend the request to include a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as S. Gulfview is an arterial street per the Comprehensive Plan (criteria for attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and retail sales). Provide justification for the deviation. Response No. 44: The comprehensive infill application has been revised to request relief to allow the access to South Gulfview. Comment No. 45: It appears the building is located within the visibility triangles on the north side of the southern driveway on S. RECHVE? 19 JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • * ORIGINAL Gulfview Blvd. and the driveway on the north. Please confirm. If so located, include as part of the application and provide a complete justification for such encroachment from a vehicular and pedestrian safety standpoint. Response No. 45: The plans have been revised to clarify that the building wall does not obstruct the sight visibility triangle. Comment No. 46: Exhibit B, Section B, includes a request to the rear setback for structures other than buildings from 20 feet to 16 feet. Unclear what this is requesting, as there isn't any setback indicated on the civil plans at 16 feet, nor something "other than a building" shown. Explain. Response No. 46: The rear setback for structures other than buildings refers to a sidewalk. A sidewalk does not interfere with the seawall's tie- backs. Thus, the setback encroachment is inconsequential. Comment No. 47: General Applicability criteria #1 - Provide a detailed analysis of how this project is "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located." Response No. 47: See revised Exhibit B. Comment No. 48: General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide a detailed analysis of how this project will not "significantly impair the value" of adjacent land and buildings. Response No. 48: See revised Exhibit B. Comment No. 49: General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a detailed response to show how this project "will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood," including the location and number of driveways. Response No. 49: See revised Exhibit B. Comment No. 50: General Applicability criteria #4 - Provide the information provided to the Traffic Operations Division to the Planning Department, so that it is part of the application file. However, this pertains to a Traffic Impact Analysis. Provide a response of how this project "minimizes traffic congestion" by defining "adequate" drive aisles and stacking space at the driveways. Response No. 50: See revised Exhibit B. RECETV E md# UL 11 2005 J 20 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • ORIGINAL Comment No. 51: General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project is "consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel." Provide specific information regarding surrounding building uses, height, mass, etc. Response No. 51: See revised Exhibit B. Comment No. 52: General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project "minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties." It is noted that the "peaceful, bright courtyard, water features an verandas" are mostly on the fourth level, where the general public will not even see these features. Provide the operational characteristics (hours of operation, etc.) that are proposed for the retail portions of this development, especially the "outdoor retail sales, display and storage" use. Response No. 52: See revised Exhibit B. Comment No. 53: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Describe in detail how this redevelopment project is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, ® intensity and development standards," including all of the reductions to setbacks (including the CCCL) and increases JUL 11 2005 to height (see "request" prepared by staff). The cupolas are purely decorative and are not proposed to "hide various PLANNING DEPARTMENT mechanical equipment," which is why the project is CITY OFCLEARWATER meeting the Code provisions for a maximum of 16 feet above the roof deck for the elevator and mechanical equipment for the "overruns." Response No. 53: See revised Exhibit B. The cupolas provide West Indies; character which is very important to the interesting and appealing island look. They also decrease the scale of the building by adding. a detailed human scale element as in Beach by Design guidelines. Comment No. 54: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project is "compatible with adjacent land uses." Response No. 54: See revised Exhibit B. Comment No. 55: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project will 21 n U • ORIGINAL. "upgrade the immediate vicinity" of this property. The City has a project called Beach Walk. What portion(s) of Beach Walk is the applicant constructing that otherwise wouldn't have been constructed by the City? Unclear how the fountain (only one on the ground level), the plaza (I assume you mean the plaza up on the fourth level, which the general public will not enjoy or see) and the retail uses "improve the pedestrian access and enjoyment of this area of the beach." Provide details. Response No. 55: See revised Exhibit B. There are two fountains, one in front of hotel and one in front of retail kiosks. They are for pedestrian quality and identity. Comment No. 56: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project "creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Provide details as to the surrounding area. Response No. 56: See revised Exhibit B. Comment No. 57: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - Provide detailed responses as to how flexibility for this project "are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole," specifically as to the following: 1. Termination of Nonconforming Status - This was addressed under FLD2005-01005. Remove from application. Response: The request for termination of nonconforming status remains part of the request. See revised Exhibit B. 2. Height - Provide a detailed response, in accordance with Section 4-1403.C.4, as to how this project's increased height provides a "reasonable relationship between the number of units transferred and any increases in building height." Provide the number of units above 100 51ECENED feet. Also address the other portion of this Section that states Compatibility with the surrounding area and JUL 11 ??05 feasibility of the project shall be considered when approving any increase in height." 9MNING DEPARTMENT approving any increase in height." CITY OF 22 0 0 ORIGINAL Response: See revised Exhibit B. 3. Setbacks - Unclear as to relief is being sought in relation to the "incorporation of the Beach Walk improvements into the site, along the easterly and northerly boundaries." Provide details as to how the City's Beach Walk project is impacting the redevelopment of this site in a manner that setback reductions must be requested. Application does not provide a clear reason why compliance with the setback requirements measured from the CCCL is a problem. Response: See revised Exhibit B. Comment No. 58: Provide a detailed response to the TDR criteria of Section 4- 1403.A: 1. The development of the ° parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Response : See revised Exhibit B. 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; Response: See revised Exhibit B. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses; Response: See revised Exhibit B. 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and See revised Exhibit B. Rno(CE*WED5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and {ltd 11 2?G5 function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for PLANNING DEPARTMENT development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. RU LEARWATER See revised Exhibit B. Comment No. 59: Provide a detailed response to Section 4-1403.c.3 - "Appropriate view corridors are incorporated in the design 23 0 0 ORIGINAL of the parcel proposed for development and all design standards in Article 3 Division 5 are otherwise satisfied." Response No. 59: View corridors, to the maximum guideline, are provided on the north and south. Comment No. 60: Due to the nature of the proposed design, it is recommended to provide a perspective drawing to assist in understanding the views and massing of this project (at least looking southwest). Response No. 60: This will be accomplished by CDB hearing. Comment No. 61: Mass/Bulk Review - It is stated in #4 that at least 68% of the facades are covered with architectural accents, windows or decorative railings. Provide the percentage calculated for each facade. Response No. 61: North 68% South 67% East 65% West 76% Comment No. 62: Mass/Bulk Review #8 - There is only one fountain on the ground level, not fountains. Revise. Response No. 62: The plans were revised to show two proposed fountains. Comment No. 63: Tower Separation #1e - Provide the square footages of the floorplates over 45 feet in height that you are requesting a deviation from. Response No. 63: Condo Level Area 7 29,836 s.f. 8 29,836 s.f. 9 29,836 s.f. 10 29,836 s.f. 11 26,296 s.f. 12 20,611 s.f. 13 20,611 s.f. 14 18,102 s.f. -kJtr1-3(( &o/m= 15 18,102 s.f. Hotel Level Area d 7 10,515 s.f. E 8 . V .?. DENT ° 10,515 s.f. CRY CIC t-1 CAMAIATI 24 • ORIGINAL 9 10,515 s.f. 10 10,515 s.f. 11 10,515 s.f. Comment No. 64: Concerned with the proposed "outdoor retail sales, display and storage" use in relation to the Beach by Design Design Guideline for "Street-Level Facades" #4 on Page 62 which states "Goods for sale will not be displayed outside of a building, except as a permitted temporary use. This does not apply to outdoor food service establishments." Advise. Response No. 64: This is an enclosable kiosk, not an outdoor display. It is like an open air arcade completely controllable. Comment No. 65: Provide a response to Beach by Design Design Guidelines for "fountains" on Page 65. Response No. 65: These are small bubbling fountains to enhance the pedestrian environment. Comment No. 66: Provide color rendered drawings (at least the front elevation) to show the intended color scheme of the buildings. Also provide 8.5"x11" reductions to Planning for presentation at the CDB. Response No. 66: This is included 15 - 8Yx 11's were included. We are including 5 more. These were provided with the original submittal and we are re-submitting prior to CDB. Comment No. 67: Are there any storage units on the ground level (below FEMA line) for unit owners? If so, show location and design. Response No. 67: No, there are none. Comment No. 68: Proposal intends the overnight accommodation rooms/units to be "condo-hotel." As such, provide the operational characteristics of the hotel. If approved, the following condition will be recommended: R ECHVED JlIL 11 1005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITYOFCLEARWATER "That the use of the southern building on this property be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 days, where occupancy of rooms/units arise from a rental agreement, other agreement or the payment of consideration. At the request of the City Manager or designee, the records of the business shall be 25 • 0 ORIGINAL made available for examination to determine whether the length of stay complies with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines, revocation of the occupational license and/or any other enforcement afforded by law or by City regulations. A license must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, shall be maintained. This portion of the development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall rooms/units qualify for homestead exemption or home or business occupational licenses." Response No. 68: The applicant is reviewing the proposed condition to insure compliance with U.S. Federal Securities Act. Comment No. 69: Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program." Response No. 69: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 70: Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits." Response No. 70: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 71: Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks." Response No. 71: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 72: Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits." Response No. 72: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. RECE?VED E)??I?? 1`? ?E JUG I 1 ???5 11111. 11 2005 26 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • 10 ORIGINAL, Comment No. 73: Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid." Response No. 73: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 74: Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits." Response No. 74: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 75: Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work." Response No. 75: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 76: Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB." Response No. 76: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 77: Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy." Response No. 77: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. RECEIVED Al 1l- 11 2005 27 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFP 0 • Comment No. 78: Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy." Response No. 78: Noted and acceptable to the applicant Comment No. 79: Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 557/579 Cyprus Avenue, 625/627 Bay Esplanade, 665 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of Al platted lots at 557/579 Cyprus Avenue, 625/627 Bay Esplanade, 665 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site 557/579 Cyprus Avenue, 625/627 Bay Esplanade, 665 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits." Response No. 79: Noted and acceptable to the applicant OTHER: No Comments 7/11/2005 11:18 AM 45934.109561 #349283 v1 - TW/Beach Residences/Response to Comments 28 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 4:53 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: Draft 6.30.05 DRC comments for FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022, 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. draft 6.30.05 dre action agend... Message 0 . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:32 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: 430 South Gulfview -FLD2005-05047 Thank you very much Wayne, for getting this to me by end of the week. I know you are swamped. I will pass the info. along to all parties involved. Have a nice weekend. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:07 PM To: Jayne E. Sears Subject: RE: 430 South Gulfview -FLD2005-05047 Jayne - I am attaching a Letter of Completeness for this project, scheduled for the June 30, 2005, DRC meeting. However, I am also attaching a Mixed Use Calculation I have done for this project. By my calculations, the project has one too many dwelling units. Thought I would give you a heads up on this. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:18 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ed Armstrong Subject: 430 South Gulfview -FLD2005-05047 Any news on Taylor Woodrow/Adam's Mark completeness? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 6/6/2005 Message • . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:07 PM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Subject: RE: 430 South Gulfview -FLD2005-05047 Jayne - I am attaching a Letter of Completeness for this project, scheduled for the June 30, 2005, DRC meeting. However, I am also attaching a Mixed Use Calculation I have done for this project. By my calculations, the project has one too many dwelling units. Thought I would give you a heads up on this. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:18 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ed Armstrong Subject: 430 South Gulfview -FLD2005-05047 Any news on Taylor Woodrow/Adam's Mark completeness? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 6/5/2005 0 CITY OF CLARWATER ° Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM June 03, 2005 E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 RE: FLD2005-05047 -- 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-05047. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on June 30, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, r,-t- h - ?j" Wayn Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-05047 - 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD 0 0 6/3/05 Mixed Use Calculation for Adams Mark Property - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR =1.0 and maximum density = 30 du/acre) 1. Permitted FAR ..................................................................1.0 2. Building square footage of non-residential portion .....................x 2,910 sf 3. Lot area required to support non-residential use in the building ......= 2,910 sf 4. Lot area of upland ............................................................ 81,450 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non-residential use in the building (#A3) :..................................- 2,910 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ....= 78,540 sf 7. Divide #A6 ..................................................................... 78,540 sf 8. Land area in an acre .........................................................- 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage .............................:......................................= 1.803 acres 10. Multiply lot acreage ........................................................... 1.803 acres 11. Maximum density ............................................................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ......................... = 54 du B. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) 1. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ............................ 54 du 2. Multiply by maximum transfer of 20% of #B1 ...........................x 0.2 3. Maximum number of du to be transferred in to this property ..........= 10 du C. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA)............ 217 rooms (Terminated through FLD2005-01005) 2. Subtract new OVA rooms/units ............................................ . 78 rooms 3. Remaining OVA rooms/units ............................................... 139 4. Conversion of OVA to dwelling units (40/30 rule) ..................... 104 du 5. Add in TDR (#B3) .......................................................... 10 du 6. Total number of dwelling units allowable ..............................= 114 du 7. Divide #A3 .................................................................. 2,910 sf 8. By land area to support 1 dwelling unit (43,560 sf - 30 du/acre) .... = 1,452 sf 9. Number of dwelling units = to #A2 ...................................... .... 2 du 10. Subtract #C9 from #C6 for Maximum Number of Dwelling Units in conjunction with Commercial floor area (#A2) .......................... .112 du • s ' C u r t s G a l n e s 0 H a I I J o n e s Architects 1213 Fast 6th Avenue, Tampa, Florida, 33605-4905 Voice (813) 228-8000 Fax (813) 228-0770 Web Site egharchitects.com FL Cert 400001590 Aug 25, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 Re: Development Order No. FLD2005-05047 - Indigo Beach Residences (Formerly Minor Revisions Dear Mr. Wells, 430 South Gulfview Blvd. Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment) Here are our responses to your comments dated July 7, 2006 (the responses are in bold/blue): Revisions Needed to Indigo Beach Residences - 430 South Gulfview Blvd. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 28 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER (Please find attached a revised set of documents dated 8/21/06. Each sheet has been revised as a response to your comments; architectural section sheet 1-A2.00 have been added.) Revisions Needed to Indigo Beach Residences Plans - 430 South Gulfview Blvd. 1. 1. Sheet 0-A 1.10 - Note: Regarding the service portions of the building needing to be above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) (due to FEMA V-Zone), the areas indicated on this level will need to be further reviewed by the City Plans Examiner as part of the building plans when they are submitted for a building permit (as to intended use and compliance with Code requirements). Agreed, plans will be reviewed by the City Plans Examiner. J2. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Parking spaces 1, 60, and 61 have been reconfigured since the previously submitted plans for this "Minor Revision" by separating space 1 from spaces 60 and 61 by a low wall and reorienting spaces 60 and 61 to be accessed from the hotel parking area. Spaces 60 and 61 now only function with the proposed turnaround between spaces 57 and 58. Plans do not indicate how this turnaround area will be striped and marked to ensure no parking occurs in this area. Agreed, sheet 0-A1.10 now shows the revised plan. The space between parking spaces 57 and 58 is now striped and is also marked "No Parking" to ensure no parking will occur in the turn around Jarea. 3. Prior comment: Sheet 0-A 1.10 - Parking spaces on the west side of the building on both the north and south sides of the stairwell require the drivers to back out "blind" due to the solid walls of the stairwell. Either eliminate these two parking spaces or provide visibility improvements (mirrors or other alternative measures). New comment: The parking spaces have not been eliminated and the plans do not include any additional measures that would improve visibility (response sheet dated June 19, 2006, from Chuck Jones indicated mirror will be provided - but none are shown on the plans). The ground floor plan has been reviewed. Two mirrors have been proposed so that drivers are not backing out "blind" from parking spaces 25 and 26; please see sheet 0-A1.10 for the mirror locations. 4. Prior comment: Sheet 0-A 1.10 - When drivers are attempting to locate an empty parking space within the hotel parking area on Level 1, there are dead ends for the parking areas. The only area of concern is the Indigo Beach Residences - 8.256 • Page 2 northernmost parking area where a turn around is necessary for motorists to be able to turn around in. Eliminate the easternmost parking space on the north side to provide this area as a turn . around (mark/label/sign as such). New comment: The turnaround provided for this dead end drive aisle is not functional. The turning movement shown on sheet 3 of the Civil Plans indicates the use of parking space number 47 to complete the turning movement. Since parking space 47 may be occupied, the turn around area is too short and the turn around area is against a wall, additional measures will be required in this area. Suggest using parking space 47 as the designated turn around. Sheet 0-AI.10 now shows the revision of the dead end. Parking spaces 47, 48, 49, and 50 have been reconfigured. This allows for a functional turn around space right of parking space 46. J 5. Prior comments: A - Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels; B - Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. New comment: Columns 126, 153, and 161B on the first floor in the public parking area are of concern. The turning movement at column 161B shown on Sheet 3 of the Civil Plans indicated that to complete the turn a vehicle must encroach into the oncoming lane. If the columns cannot be moved, what other measure can be utilized to provide for safety of the public at these locations? Structurally, we are unable to move columns 126, 153, and 161B. However, we are proposing three mirrors to aid drivers' visibility at the turns at those locations. Please see sheets 0-A1.10, 0-A1.20, and 0-A1.30. l6. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Complete the Parking Space Legend on the right hand side with real numbers. Note: A - Code does not permit compact spaces; B - There is no parking on level 4; C - The parking requirement for hotel is one space per hotel unit; D - On levels 2 and 3 there is parking provided for attached dwellings. Code requirement is 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit (not one per dwelling unit) and there is only 112 dwelling units (not 257). Agreed, the Parking Space Legend on sheet 0-A1.10 has been revised and completed. ?7. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Dimension spaces 19 and 20. Spaces 19 and 20 have been dimensioned; please see sheet 0-A1.10. ?8. Sheets 0-A1.31 and 0-A1.32 - There is I1'-2" floor-to-floor height between Levels 3 and 4. The pools are elevated 2'-4" above FFE of level 4. The depths of the pools are unknown. Will there be sufficient vehicular clearance on Level 3 below pools? Please see sheet 1-A2.00. The section drawing indicates that the pools are elevated 21-4" above FFE on Level 4 and have depths of 4'-6" to accommodate vehicular clearance below. Sheet 0-A1.41 - Unclear why the finished deck elevation on the west side of the club is at 34'-10", when the finished floor elevation in the club is at 32'-6". Explain/Revise. We have revised the main pool deck for the Condo Hotel and the Residences; it is now at elevation 341-0", which is 11-6" above FFE. This allows sufficient vehicular clearance on Level 3; please refer to sheet 1-A2.00. X10. Prior comment: Sheet 0-A1.10 - Show the sidewalk on the west and northwest sides of the building connecting to the sidewalk on City property to the north. New comment: Sheets 0-A1.05, 0-A1.10 and Civil 3/13 - Plans show a sidewalk extension onto the City property at the northwest corner of the property; however, there is no sidewalk at that location on the City property. Civil sheet 3/13 shows the location of the sidewalk on the City property where proposed sidewalk should tie into. Revise. Additionally, approved plans showed egress sidewalks from the building type into the City sidewalk that runs parallel on the north side of the north property line. Unclear why the proposal now includes a duplicate parallel sidewalk on this property running out to South Gulfview Blvd. So long as Engineering approves of connecting into the City sidewalk with the egress sidewalks from the building, eliminate the duplicate sidewalk. Agreed, the sidewalks have been revised. We eliminated the duplicated sidewalk along the northeast portion of the site. The new layout is comparable to that of the approved plans; please see sheet 0-A1.10. )11. Sheets 0-A1.05 and Civil 3/13 - Show a two-foot setback from the south property line to the trash staging concrete pad (see Sheet 0-A1.10). Agreed, the Civil plan now shows a two-foot setback, consistent with the Architectural plan. 12. Sheet 0-A1.05 - A dimension of 81-8" is shown indicating the proposed setback to the CCCL on the west; however, this dimension is not shown at the closest point to CCCL. At the closest point it scales at less than the approved setback of eight feet. Section 4-406 does not permit a reduction of setbacks under a "Minor Revision." Revise to show compliance with the required eight-foot setback from the CCCL on the west (also show on Civil Sheet 3/13). Indigo Beach Residences - 8.25.•6 • Page 3 The Ground Floor Plan and West Elevation have been revised; the portion of the wall that is beyond the setback is now recessed and compliant with the required setback from the CCCL. The new J measurement is 9'1 please see sheet 0-A1.05 on the Architectural and sheet 3 of 13 on the Civil. A-+ 13. Sheets 0-A1.05, 0-A1.10 and Civil 3/13 - Trellises and canopies supported by columns are now shown on the front of the building within the required 15-foot front setback. Section 4-406 does not permit a reduction of setbacks under a "Minor Revision." We have eliminated the columns on the east side of the site. The Trellis and the curved canopy are now attached to the surface of the building. According to Community Development Code, Indigo Beach Residences is in the Tourist District; such projection of the trellis "shall be limited to ten feet and shall be permitted into any rights-of-way provided a clearance of nine feet over grade is maintained". Please see sheets 0-A1.05, 0-A1.10 and Civil sheet 3 of 13. J 14. Sheets 0-A1.10, 0-A1.20 and 0-A1.31 - The minimum vertical height clearance for a handicap can is 8'-2". A minimum dimension of 114" (or 9'-6") is indicated in the "Parking Space Legend" on the right hand side, inconsistent with 8'-2". Revise. According to the 2004 Florida Building Code, Section 11-4.6.5, 1 in every 8 accessible parking spaces shall be "van accessible" with a vertical clearance of no less than 114" or 99-699. 15. Prior comment: Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30, and 0-A2.40 - Provide the height of the residential condo building from the top of roof to the top of the cupola. New comment: Cupola is now shown exceeding the maximum height of 24 feet above the top of the roof deck approved by the CDB. Section 4-406 does not permit and increase to height under a "Minor Revision." The stair and the elevator equipment rooms have been modified so that the height of the cupola does not exceed the maximum height of 24 feet above the top of roof deck as approved by the CDB. Please see sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30, and 0-A2.40 for the new height of the cupola on the residential condo building. ?16. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.40 - A Building Materials List has been provided; however, the paint list identifies a "roof, top, middle, and base" as to the proposed colors. Plans do not indicate, however, where the top, middle, and base begin and end. Indicate such areas on the plans. Additionally, the plans need to indicate the color of the various building elements (brackets, ironwork, guardrails, E.I.F.S., trim, decorative tiles, etc.). Provide color samples/chips of proposed colors. A color rendering has been provided for each elevation to indicate the locations of colors. Architectural building elements such as brackets, guardrails, trim, etc. are white except the Bahama shutters. Please see the corresponding renderings sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30, and 0-A2.40. Additionally, color chips are attached to this response letter. 17. Sheet 2-A1.30 - Code only permits elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures to project higher than the flat roof. Unclear of the proposed use of the three rooms on the front of the building. The three rooms in question each contain window cleaning equipment and maintenance safety systems. J18. Sheet 2-A1.30 - Unclear what the two squares with the octagonal structures joined by a "V" east of the elevator equipment room are indicating as to a structural component. Label. Agreed, the octagonal shapes on the plan are cooling towers, which are joined by "v" pipes. These have now been labeled; please see sheet 2-A1.30. 19. The approved height of the hotel building indicated the height of the roof structure (excluding cupola) at 16 feet above the top of roof deck. Proposal is now for the roof structure at approximately 22 feet above the top of the roof deck. Need to provide justification for the increase to the height of the roof structure. The height of the roof structure is 20'-9" above the top of the roof deck in order to sufficiently conceal the cooling towers. 20. There is an open pavilion shown on the northwest corner of the residential building indicated on Sheet 1-A1.60 and the building elevations. This open pavilion was not shown on the approved plans, nor shown on the previously submitted plans for this "Minor Revision" at the now proposed height of 24 feet above the top of the roof deck (previously submitted plans indicated a maximum of 16 feet). Code now specifically does not permit structures that accommodate rooftop occupancy that exceed the maximum permitted height (150 feet). Also, on the previously submitted plans this structure appeared as an extension of the condo units below (as a vaulted ceiling feature). This structure needs to be redesigned acceptable to Planning Department. The space under the tower is not intended to be an open pavilion; it is an extension of the tower and is not meant to be occupied at any time. The residential unit plans below the tower do not have any special features. 2 Elevations indicate a roofed structure supported by one column at the northeast corner of the building over • Indigo Beach Residences - 8.25.2006 U Page 4 the ground level. This structure needs to be shown on Sheets 0-A1.05, 0-A1.10, and Civil 3/13. The ground level plan shows two columns within the setback which support the trellis above. The North Elevation and East Elevation have been revised; please see sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0- A1.05, 0-A1.10, and Civil sheet 3 of 13. Mr. Wells, we hope that these revised plans and responses clearly address your concerns. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or comments. Regards, ak*t-bM Chuck Jones, AIA, Principal Curts Gaines Hall Jones Architects 1213 E. 6th Avenue Tampa, FL 33605050 cc: Ed Armstrong Octavio Cabrera Phil Graham Michael Delk Scott Rice Jeff Handlin Joe Burdette Wells, Wayne From: Chaddy Hanwisai [Chaddy@CGHJArchitects.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:59 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Indigo Beach Res. - color sample Good morning Mr. Wells, 0 Page 1 of 1 Please see the attached color samples for the project above. I apologize for not sending them with the drawings yesterday. Thank you for your time, Chaddy Cliaddv Hanwisai, AAIA Cu Gaines.. . . . . . . . }Iall Jones Areliitects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a: 1.213 E. 6th Avenue Pampa, 1*1 33605 p: 813.228.8000 f : 813 228.0770 e.: chaddy(ci?egharch.i.tects.com 8/29/2006 Vital Yellow (D .0 3 N Compatible Cream ? a r 3 Q> vover vvnire o > 3 Q? N I ''R T OFTRU dTTE 'AL Curts Gaines Hall Jones Architects 1213 East 6th Avenue 813. 228.8000 Tampa, FL 33605 813. 228.0770 fax Sending To: City of Clearwater Planning Department From: Chuck Jones 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Date: Aug 28, 2006 Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Job #: 05-23 Attention: Mr. Wayne Wells Re: INDIGO BEACH RES. We are sending you _ Attached -Under Separate Cover via courier the following items: Shop Drawings Prints X Plans Samples Specifications Copy of Letter Change Order Other Conies Date No. Deserintion lea. 08-28-06 Full size architectural set lea. 08-28-06 Full size civil set lea 08-28-06 Response to letter of minor revision THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For Approval Approved as Submitted Resubmit x For Your Use Approved as Noted Submit x As Requested Returned for Corrections Return For Review & Comment Other Remarks: Mr. Wells, Copies for Approval Copies for Distribution Corrected Prints Please review the response to the letter of minor revision along with the drawing provided. Thank you, Chuck Jones ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 28 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Copies To: Signed: 0 0 Page 1 of I Wells, Wayne From: hunraf@aol.com Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:34 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Joe Burdette Re: Indigo Beach Minor Revisions Wayne Chaddy from Curts, Gains and Hall went on vacation and then got sick. We should have the minor revisions to Indigo Beach to you by the end of next week. In the meantime, there is no need to process the site plan any further until we get the minor revisions back in. Sorry for the confusion. Joe Check out AOL.com. today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free. 7/25/2006 • • Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 3:52 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: Minor Revision - FLD2005-05047 - 430 South Gulfview Blvd. Wayne, I have reviewed the resubmittal dated 6/19/06 for the subject project. Remaining issues include: 9. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Parking spaces on the west side of the building on both the north and south sides of the stairwell require the drivers to back out "blind" due to the solid walls of the stairwell. Either eliminate these two parking spaces or provide visibility improvements (mirrors or other alternative measures). The parking spaces have not been eliminated and the plans do not include any additional measures that would improve visibility. 11. Sheet 0-A1.10 - When drivers are attempting to locate an empty parking space within the hotel parking area on Level 1, there are dead ends for the parking areas. The only area of concern is the northernmost parking area where a turn around area is necessary for motorists to be able to turn around in. Eliminate the easternmost parking space on the north side to provide this area as a turn around (mark/label/sign as such). The turnaround provided for this dead end drive aisle is not functional. The turning movement shown on Sheet 3 of the Civil Plans indicates the use of parking space number 47 to complete the turning movement. Since parking space 47 may be occupied, the turn around area is too short and the turn around area is against a wall, additional measure will be required in this area. Suggest using parking space 47 as the designated turn around. 17. Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels. Columns 126, 153 and 161B on the first floor in the public parking area are of concern. The turning movement at column 161B shown on Sheet 3 of the Civil Plans indicates that to complete the turn a vehicle must encroach into the oncoming lane. If the columns cannot be moved, what other measure can be utilized to provide for safety of the public at these locations? D. Scott Rice Land Deveh Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.om ORIGINAL I COW Grog 1010 RECEIVED JUN 20 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OF CLEARWATER Wayne Here are the minor revision plans for Indigo Beach. If there are still any problems, please contact me and I will see that they are addressed. arks 1 'Joe Burdette J7274-458-4528 hunraf@aol.com 1 I It `V r , ' ' - = - ' - ' ? ? C u r t s Gaines Hall Jones Architects 121 3 East 6th Avenue, Tampa, Florida, 33605-4905 Voice (313) 223-3000 Fax (813) 228-0770 Web Site cgharchitects.com FL Cert #00001590 June 19, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 Re: Development Order No. FLD2005-05047 - 430 South Gulfview Blvd. Indigo Beach Residences (Formerly Adams Mark Hotel Redevelopment) Minor Revisions Dear Mr. Wells, ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 2 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARpMATER Here are our responses to your comments dated February 24, 2006 (the responses are in bold/blue): Revisions Needed to Indigo Beach Residences - 430 South Gulfview Blvd Please find attached a revised set of documents dated 6/19/06. Each sheet has been revised as a response to your comments; architectural site plan sheet 0-A1.05 and civil podium showing parking templates sheet 3-5 of 13 have been added. Revisions Needed to Indigo Beach Residences Plans - 430 South Gulfview Blvd 1. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Due to the site being within a FEMA V-Zone, all service portions of the building must be above Base Flood Elevation (BFE). Relocate, for the hotel portion, the reception, office and accessory retail upstairs above BFE. Relocate, for the residential portion, the reception, office and manager's office upstairs above BFE. Ground floor plan has been reviewed by FEMA and based on the 2004 Building Code related to non- habitable spaces only parking, building access or (street lobby), and storage are allowed below BFE. Please see sheet 0-A1.10. 2. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Level 1 hotel parking is 81 spaces (not 79). Level 1 hotel parking has been revised and renumbered; the parking count is now 78 spaces. Please see sheet 0-A1.10. 3. Stairwell egress - This has not been reviewed with Building Plans Reviewer. This should be done to ensure compliance with Building Code provisions and that such required egress does not create issues for the proposed design (thereby reducing the number of parking spaces). Stairwell egress has been reviewed with Building Plans Reviewer and is compliant with the 2004 Building Code and Clearwater Fire Department. 4. Sheet 0-A1.30 - There are 83 residential spaces (not 84) provided on the Podium Level 3. Podium Level 3 has been revised and renumbered; the parking count is now 81 spaces. See sheet 0- A1.30. 5. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Show the sidewalk on the west and northwest sides of the building connecting to the sidewalk on City property to the north. Agreed, sheet 0-A1.10 has been revised showing sidewalk on the west and northwest sides of the building. 6. Sheet 0-A 1.10 - Show the connector sidewalk from the covered patio by the residential portion to the Indigo Beach Residences - 6.19.7006 Page 2 sidewalk on City property to the north. Agreed, sheet 0-A1.10 has been revised showing sidewalk from the covered patio connecting to the sidewalk on City property to the north. 7. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Revise the trash staging concrete pad to a side setback of two feet, as approved under FLD2005-05047. Agreed, the trash staging concrete pad has been revised with a side setback of two feet as approved under the original Development Order. Please see sheet 0-A1.10. 8. Sheet 0-A 1.10 - Show the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) on the west and northwest sides. Ensure the minimum setback from the CCCL to the southwest corner of the building is at least eight feet, as approved under FLD2005-05047. Agreed, a site plan has been added; please see sheet 0-A1.05 for the required setback of 8'-0" for the Coastal Construction Control Line. 9. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Parking spaces on the west side of the building on both the north and south sides of the stairwell require the drivers to back out "blind" due to the solid walls of the stairwell. Either eliminate these two parking spaces or provide visibility improvements (mirrors or other alternative measures). This has been revised, please see sheet 0-A1.10. Mirrors will be provided for visibility improvements; therefore, keeping the parking spaces. 10. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Provide pedestrian crosswalk pavement markings from the two handicap parking spaces on the south side to the hotel lobby. Agreed, the plan has been revised showing crosswalk markings from handicap parking spaces to hotel lobby. 11. Sheet 0-A 1.10 - When drivers are attempting to locate an empty parking space within the hotel parking area on Level 1, there are dead ends for the parking areas. The only area of concern is the northernmost parking area where a turn around area is necessary for motorists to be able to turn around in. Eliminate the easternmost parking space on the north side to provide this area as a turn around (mark/label/sign as such). The revised plan 0-A1.10 now provides a turn around area between the exit corridor and the elevator just below parking space 47. Additionally, valet service will be provided for hotel guests. 12. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Level 1 guest parking area - Flip the handicap access aisle to the south side of the handicap space to be adjacent to the lobby wall on the south. Agreed, the revised plan now has the handicap access aisle to the south side of the handicap space with crosswalk marking to condominium lobby. 13. Sheets 0-A1.20 and 0-A1.30 - Ensure a 44" clearance from end of handicap parking spaces to the elevator lobby southeast of the stairwell south of Villa 01 on both Levels 2 and 3. Agreed, the parking spaces and the drive aisle have been redesigned providing a clearance of 6'-5" from end of handicap parking spaces to the elevator lobby. 14. Dimension the width of the balcony projections from the face of the building (maximum of two feet allowed by Code). The balcony projections from the face of the building are 1'-10" as noted on sheet 1-A1.10. 15. Ensure the vertical height clearance for handicap van is a minimum of 8'-2". Agreed, a minimum clearance of 81-2" will be provided for accessible spaces. 16. Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. Car tuning templates are now indicated on civil drawing sheets 3, 4, and 5 of 13. 17. Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels. Some of the columns have been set back, but many will need to remain on the edge of the drive aisle due to structural span / design constraints. 18. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.40 - Unclear of what the dashed line rectangles represent on the roof. Advise/remove. The dashed lines on the roof have been removed. 19. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.40 - Provide the height of the residential condo building from the top of roof slab to the top of the cupola. The dimension of 24'-0" is shown on sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.40; however, the height of the cupola exceeds the height of the original Development Order by 61-10". This is due to the elevator overrun and the equipment room located on the roof. 20. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.40 - Windows indicated are much plainer than that on the approved plans (proposed windows are large single panes of glass instead of windows on the approved plans that had more panes of glass, which gives a different appearance and character of the fagade). Revise or provide a justification for such change. Agreed, the windows on all elevations have been redesigned to give more character to the faVades. 21. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.40 - The letter of request for a Minor Revision indicates that Indigo Beach Residences - 6.194006 • Page 3 "bahama" shutters are still be provided, it is unclear where on the fagade/windows. Revise/show. "Bahama" shutters are now placed on various locations, mainly on the top levels of the condo tower in keeping the same character as the approved drawings. 22. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.40 - Provide a Building Materials Legend similar to that on the approved plans, as it is difficult to determine the materials and colors of these materials (example: roof material looks like a standing seam metal roof, whereas the approved plans indicate a clay barrel tile roof system). Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.40 are showing Building Materials Legend. It is our intention that the roof material be a painted standing seam metal roof not a clay barrel tile roof system; the elevations have always graphically indicated a metal roof, which is in keeping with the "West Indies" character of the building. This item on the original legend was an oversight and should have listed painted metal roofing all along. 23. Sheet 0-A2.10 - North Elevation - Score lines in the stucco finish are shown but it is unclear if such scoring has been inadvertently left off from the easternmost and westernmost bays of windows (scoring on the center bays of windows go much higher). Advise/revise. The score lines in the stucco finish are located at different levels for an architectural embellishment and aesthetics. Additionally, the score lines help to split the massing of the building. 24. Sheet 0-A2.20 - East Elevation - Balcony railings for the northern bay do not have the details similar to other balcony railings ("x" in center of railing). Revise. Additionally true for the balcony railings on the northeast side (portion seen from the east but is really on an angle - look at North Elevation for detail on this balcony railing). The balcony railings have been revised. The detail "x" is appropriate to the proportion of the different size openings on the balcony; see sheet 0-A2.20. 25. Sheet 0-A2.20 - Revise the title from "Hotel Condos Building East Elevation" to "Res. Condos Building East Elevation." Agreed, the title has been revised to "Res. Condo Building East Elevation" 26. Sheet 0-A2.20 - East Elevation - Add the cupola on top of the building. The East Elevation is now more embellished; see sheet 0-A2.20. 27. Sheet 0-A2.30 - South Elevation - Balcony railings do not have the details similar to other balcony railings ("x" in center of railing) for Levels 4 - 14 (as shown on other elevations and as shown on Level 15). Revise. Again, the balcony railings have been revised. The detail "g" is appropriate to the proportion of the different size openings on the balcony; see sheet 0-A2.30. 28. Sheet 0-A2.30 - South Elevation - Walls on the south wall of the western leg of the "L" for Levels 12 - 15 are very plain from the approved plans that had a lot more detail and character. Revise. The South Elevation has been revised with more detail and more character; please see sheet 0-A2.30. 29. Sheet 0-A2.40 - Revise the Club railing on Level 4 to be consistent with other railings in their design. Agreed, the railing on Level 4 has been redesigned to be consistent with the other railings. 30. Sheet 0-A2.40 - Add the cupola on top of the building. The West Elevation is now more embellished; see sheet 0-A2.40. 31. Sheet 0-A2.40 - Balcony railings do not have the details similar to other balcony railings ("x" in center of railing) for Level 8 (second bank of balconies from the left). Additionally, the balcony railings for the southernmost bank of balconies (right side) should be consistent from the standpoint of number of "x's" in the railing. Revise. Again, the balcony railings have been revised. The detail "x" is appropriate to the proportion of the different size openings on the balcony; see sheet 0-A2.40. Mr. Wells, we hope that these revised plans and responses clearly address your concerns. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or comments. Regards, Chuck Jones, AIA, Principal Curts Gaines Hall Jones Architects 1213 E. 6th Avenue Tampa, FL 33605050 Indigo Beach Residences - 6.194006 cc: Ed Armstrong Octavio Cabrera Phil Graham Michael Delk Scott Rice Jeff Handlin Joe Burdette • Page 4 Revisions Needed to Indigo Beach Residences Plans - 430 South Gulfview Blvd. July 7, 2006 1. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Note: Regarding the service portions of the building needing to be above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) (due to FEMA V-Zone), the areas indicated on this level will need to be further reviewed by the City Plans Examiner as part of the building plans when they are submitted for a building permit (as to intended use and compliance with Code requirements). 2. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Parking spaces 1, 60 and 61 have been reconfigured since the previously submitted plans for this "Minor Revision" by separating space 1 from spaces 60 and 61 by a low wall and reorienting spaces 60 and 61 to be accessed from the hotel parking area. Spaces 60 and 61 now only function with the proposed turnaround between spaces 57 and 58. Plans do not indicate how this turnaround area will be striped and marked to ensure no parking occurs in this area. 3. Prior comment: Sheet 0-A1.10 - Parking spaces on the west side of the building on both the north and south sides of the stairwell require the drivers to back out "blind" due to the solid walls of the stairwell. Either eliminate these two parking spaces or provide visibility improvements (mirrors or other alternative measures). New comment: The parking spaces have not been eliminated and the plans do not include any additional measures that would improve visibility (response sheet dated June 19, 2006, from Chuck Jones indicates mirror will be provided - but none are shown on the plans). 4. Prior comment: Sheet 0-A1.10 - When drivers are attempting to locate an empty parking space within the hotel parking area on Level 1, there are dead ends for the parking areas. The only area of concern is the northernmost parking area where a turn around area is necessary for motorists to be able to turn around in. Eliminate the easternmost parking space on the north side to provide this area as a turn around (mark/label/sign as such). New comment: The turnaround provided for this dead end drive aisle is not functional. The turning movement shown on Sheet 3 of the Civil Plans indicates the use of parking space number 47 to complete the turning movement. Since parking space 47 may be occupied, the turn around area is too short and the turn around area is against a wall, additional measures will be required in this area. Suggest using parking space 47 as the designated turn around. 5. Prior comments: A - Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels; B - Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. New comment: Columns 126, 153 and 161B on the first floor in the public parking area are of concern. The turning movement at column 161B shown on Sheet 3 of the Civil Plans indicates that to complete the turn a vehicle must encroach into the oncoming lane. If the columns cannot be moved, what other measure can be utilized to provide for safety of the public at these locations? 6. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Complete the Parking Space Legend on the right hand side with real numbers. Note: A - Code does not permit compact spaces; B - There is no parking on Level 4; C - The parking requirement for hotel is one space per hotel unit; D - On Levels 2 and 3 there is parking provided for attached dwellings. Code requirement is 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit (not one per dwelling unit) and there is only 112 dwelling units (not 257). 7. Sheet 0-A1.10 - Dimension spaces 19 and 20. 8. Sheets 0-A1.31 and 0-A1.32 - There is 11'-2" floor-to-floor height between Levels 3 and 4. The pools are elevated 2'-4" above FFE of Level 4. The depths of the pools are unknown. Will there be sufficient vehicular clearance on Level 3 below the pools? 9. Sheet 0-A1.41 - Unclear why the finished deck elevation on the west side of the club is at 34'-10", when the finished floor elevation in the club is at 32'-6". Explain/revise. 10. Prior comment: Sheet 0-A1.10 - Show the sidewalk on the west and northwest sides of the building connecting to the sidewalk on City property to the north. New comment: Sheets 0-A1.05, 0-A1.10 and Civil 3/13 - Plans show a sidewalk extension onto the City property at the northwest corner of the property; however, there is no sidewalk at that location on the City property. Civil Sheet 3/13 shows the location of the sidewalk on the City property where proposed sidewalk should tie into. Revise. Additionally, approved plans showed egress sidewalks from the building tying into the City sidewalk that runs parallel on the north side of the north property line. Unclear why the proposal now includes a duplicate parallel sidewalk on this property running out to South Gulfview Blvd. So long as Engineering approves of connecting into the City sidewalk with the egress sidewalks from the building, eliminate the duplicate sidewalk. 11. Sheets 0-A1.05 and Civil 3/13 - Show a two-foot setback from the south property line to the trash staging concrete pad (see Sheet 0-A1.10). 12. Sheet 0-A1.05 - A dimension of 8'-8" is shown indicating the proposed setback to the CCCL on the west; however, this dimension is not shown at the closest point to the CCCL. At the closest point it scales at less than the approved setback of eight feet. Section 4-406 does not permit a reduction of setbacks under a "Minor Revision." Revise to show compliance with the required eight-foot setback from the CCCL on the west (also show on Civil Sheet 3/13). 13. Sheets 0-A1.05, 0-A1.10 and Civil 3/13 - Trellises and canopies supported by columns are now shown on the front of the building within the required 15- foot front setback. Section 4-406 does not permit a reduction of setbacks under a "Minor Revision." 14. Sheets 0-A1.10, 0-A1.20 and 0-A1.31 - The minimum vertical height clearance for a handicap van is 8'-2". A minimum dimension of 114" (or 9'-6") is indicated in the "Parking Space Legend" on the right hand side, inconsistent with 8'-2". Revise. 15. Prior comment: Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.10 - Provide the height of the residential condo building from the top of roof slab to the top of the cupola. New comment: Cupola is now shown exceeding the maximum height of 24 feet above the top of the roof deck approved by the CDB. Section 4-406 does not permit an increase to height under a "Minor Revision." 16. Sheets 0-A2.10, 0-A2.20, 0-A2.30 and 0-A2.40 - A Building Materials List has been provided; however, the paint list identifies a "roof, top, middle and base" as to the proposed colors. Plans do not indicate, however, where the top, middle and base begin and end. Indicate such areas on the plans. Additionally, the plans need to indicate the color of the various building elements (brackets, ironwork, guardrails, E.I.F.S., trim, decorative tiles, etc.). Provide color samples/chips of proposed colors. 17. Sheet 2-A1.30 - Code only permits elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures to project higher than the flat roof. Unclear of the proposed use of the three rooms on the front of the building. 18. Sheet 2-A1.30 - Unclear what the two squares with the octagonal structures joined by a "V" east of the elevator equipment room are indicating as to a structural component. Label. 19. The approved height of the hotel building indicated the height of the roof structure (excluding cupola) at 16 feet above the top of roof deck. Proposal is now for the roof structure at approximately 22 feet above the top of the roof deck. Need to provide justification for the increase to the height of the roof structure. 20. There is an open pavilion shown on the northwest corner of the residential building indicated on Sheet 1-A1.60 and the building elevations. This open pavilion was not shown on the approved plans, nor shown on the previously submitted plans for this "Minor Revision" at the now proposed height of 24 feet above the top of the roof deck (previously submitted plans indicated a maximum of 16 feet). Code now specifically does not permit structures that accommodate rooftop occupancy that exceed the maximum permitted height (150 feet). Also, on the previously submitted plans this structure appeared as an extension of the condo units below (as a vaulted ceiling feature). This structure needs to be redesigned acceptable to Planning Department. 21. Elevations indicate a roofed structure supported by one column at the northeast corner of the building over the ground level. This structure needs to be shown on Sheets 0-A1.05, 0-A1.10 and Civil 3/13. NOTE: While not part of the Minor Revision review, approval of this project anticipated Fire Department equipment accessing the north side of this building from the City's property to the north. There have been meetings in the past regarding redesign of the City's parking lot to accommodate the Fire Department equipment access requirements. Unclear of any resolution to the redesign of the City's parking lot (including cost and responsibility for construction) as it relates to permitting and construction. S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0430 TV Residences (T) - ApprovedlRevisions Needed to Indigo Beach Residences 7.7.06doc • s Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 3:24 PM To: Sullivan, Patricia Subject: RE: 11-21 cdb meeting Patricia - The revised memorandum passed out at the meeting was for 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. (see attached). Wayne Gulfview S 0430 Time Extension... -----Original Message----- From: Sullivan, Patricia Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 11-21 cdb meeting wayne please forward me a copy of the revised memorandum for 410 s gulfview fId2006-05047/tdr2005-05022 THANKS! PAT X4088 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 5:29 PM To: 'nicholas fritsch' Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: 430 S Gulfview Nick - 1. This case was approved with less than the new current Code requirement of two parking spaces per dwelling unit and is vested as such. It was noted in the time extension granted by Mr. Delk that the Code has been amended to now require two parking spaces per unit and what was approved under the CDB original approval and what was approved under the Minor Revision. 2. The redesign of the project at 401 S. Gulfview under a Minor Revision provided for a minimum of two parking spaces per unit, in conformance with current Code. It was not a requirement under the Minor Revision to redesign to the new parking requirement. 3. The Code does not require loading spaces in the Tourist District. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: nicholas fritsch [mailto:nfritsch@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 3:27 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Wayne Andrews Subject: 430 S Gulfview Why does this case not require 2 parking spaces per DW? If the other case 401 etc is req'd, why not this? And what about spaces for delivery, staff? Thanks Nick 11/19/2006 A • REVISED • MEMORANDUM FOR FLD2006-05047 / TDR2005-05022 430 SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP WfAW Planning III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard DATE: November 8, 2006 Attached is information related to the request by Ed Armstrong, on behalf of TWBeach Residences - Clearwater, LLC, for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on February 16, 2008. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted a six-month extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: 1. The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per dwelling unit. This project was originally approved with 196 parking spaces for 112 attached dwelling units (overall parking provided of 274 spaces less the required parking for 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units at one parking space per room/unit), at a parking ratio of 1.75 parking spaces per dwelling unit. The Minor Revision currently being reviewed provides 185 parking spaces for 112 attached dwelling units (overall parking provided of 264 spaces less 79 spaces dedicated to the hotel, but including 13 guest spaces), at a parking ratio of 1.65 parking spaces per dwelling unit. 2. Section 6-109.13 was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order June 20, 2006 Maps and Photos S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished Applicationsl Gulfview S 0430 TW Residences (7) - ApprovedlGulfview S 430 Time Extension Memorandum for 11.21.06 CDB.doc MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP VJCAW Planning III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard DATE: November 8, 2006 Attached is information related to the request by Ed Armstrong, on behalf of TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC, for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on February 16, 2008. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted a six-month extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: 1. The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per dwelling unit. This project was originally approved with 196 parking spaces for 112 attached dwelling units (overall parking provided of 274 spaces less the required parking for 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units at one parking space per room/unit), at a parking ratio of 1.75 parking spaces per dwelling unit. The Minor Revision currently being reviewed provides 185 parking spaces for 112 attached dwelling units (overall parking provided of 264 spaces less 79 spaces dedicated to the hotel, but including 13 guest spaces), at a parking ratio of 1.65 parking spaces per dwelling unit. 2. Section 6-1093 was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order June 20, 2006 Maps and Photos S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD) Ilnactive or Finished Applicationsl Gulfview S 0430 TW Residences (T) - ApprovedlGu jview S 430 Time Extension Memorandum for 11.21.06 CDB.doc JOHNSO*OPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BUONS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RYAN C. GRIFFIN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.* SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIH-PIN LU* MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE BRETON H. PERMESLY F. W ALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS KIMBERLY L. SHARPE JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE No. 45934.109561 Via Email and Hand Delivery Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 November 7, 2006 Re: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Case Nos. FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 Dear Michael: On behalf of the applicant and property owner, T/W Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC, we hereby request an additional extension of the time to initiate a building permit for the referenced project, for a period of one-year to February 16, 2008. As set forth in the amended development order, you previously granted a six- month extension to February 16, 2007. The reason for this request for the additional extension is that the development of the project has been delayed due to deteriorating market conditions. We understand that this request for extension must be reviewed by the Community Development Board In accordance with Section 4-407 of the Clearwater Community Development Code. Please schedule this matter for the November 21, 2006 CDB meeting. If you need any additional information in order to set this matter for hearing, please contact my legal assistant, Jayne Sears, or me as soon as possible. CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 461 -18 18 TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 D it ?i PLANNING Ll DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER TAMPA OFFICE 403 EAST MADISON ST. SUITE 400 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-1100) TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 0 i JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Michael Delk, AICP November 7, 2006 Page 2 We thank you and the Board for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL &-PURNS, LLP E. D. Armstrong III EDA/js cc: Mr. Jeff Handlin Mr. Joe Burdette #389217 v1 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT ?• X` Pos-r Orru:r: Box 4748, CLI>.ARWATER, Fr.omDA 33758-4748 fi MUNICIPnI, Srr(vras I3r;n,rnNC, 100 Sourer Mvrrrr,r; Avr:xr;r, Cr.r nic\wnrr:r<, Fr.orzuDn 33756 Tl;I,r:hrloNi: (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RnNGG PLANNING Dr-VELOhMl;N*r RI?VIEW June 20, 2006 Mr. Tim Knight Taylor Woodrow 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33767 RE: FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Knight: On August 16, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to six feet (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to eight feet from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (August 16, 2006). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On June 9, 2006, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited the problem of changing architectural firms, the process of revising plans through the Minor Revision process that is still JO!I,? 1)Or,v\ ' COI N(ll.\!![\!I'dIN IIO\ I I1:\\ LION, C)! \( INIr\IRh7t IS!!!. JO,\U)N, (;()1 rn.\nt\no1u; (:\r,!!:.\A. I'rrltl:,ex, 0)l \(:lI\11 nl w!t "I': )I \I I'.,\il'I O1 \IIL\'I' ;\\'!) Ai I !!f\!:\'I'!\'!' Ac i it )\ !t!,," • 0 June 20, 2006 Knight - Page Two being processed (we have given conceptual or tentative approval pending the resubmission of plans responding to review comments issued February 24, 2006), construction costs affecting the design of the project, coordination of issues of construction scheduling interfacing with the City's Beach Walk project and economic conditions that have slowed sales of units. Since the approval of this project, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per dwelling unit. This project was originally approved with 196 parking spaces for 112 attached dwelling units (overall parking provided of 274 spaces less the required parking for 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units at one parking space per room/unit),. at a parking ratio of 1.75 parking spaces per dwelling unit. The Minor Revision currently being reviewed provides 185 parking spaces for 112 attached dwelling units (overall parking provided of 264 spaces less 79 spaces dedicated to the hotel, but including 13 guest spaces), at a parking ratio of 1.65 parking spaces per dwelling unit. 2. Section 6-109.B was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. In considering the above changes to the Code, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension to February 16, 2007, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which. means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. June 20, 2006 Knight - Page Three If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michae Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationsIGulfview S0430 TW Residences (T) - ApprovedIGut(view S 0430 Time Extension Development Order 620.06doc Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4504 wayne.wells(&,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL C? November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; reviewed building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director, Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City . Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; supervised six employees; prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). 0 • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; drafted ordinance revisions; general research. • Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 %2 years; worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section Q Q o SAN ?A ?o w m PAPAYA ST > 4 GE Z < PW BD O Causeway BWE WINDWARD S R 00 0 FIRST y.? 0 m? 2 DR TH IRD Si PROJECT o Sa SITE aa h U? BRIG Hi WATER DR FIFTH S7 OW O BAYSIOE YTYY2 oR S9YyyAY g,VD /Yy S te r s SS O C? Location Map Owner: TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC Case: FLD2005-05047 TDR2005-05022 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 2.44 Size(Acres): PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A • • Aerial Map Owner. TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC Case: FLD2005-05047 TDR2005-05022 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard ( Property 2.45 Size(Acres) : PIN: 1 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 1 Atlas Page: I 276A • • r - ---' ------ a Q 7'H ST Q /r4trt---------1 O 405 L405 4 11 , _ -? ; 409 1 I r-._/ t 1 0SA? 1 J - / I I a_ ? a-'?0 _ t 410 -------'-1 ; 1 415 -??-?--. I T I "._- - 412 421--?? `; 420 1 1 1 , 1 I ?440 \00, \ 2 / ? t-'? q39-__1 \ ?^ t :; 1 + Q P I , 4 490 ; ILI - i > 1 f lam' I i i / I ` / i ? qA? s ? l r I 445 r? I L? I I I I / J / Zoning Map FLD2005-05047 Owner. I TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC I Case: TDR2005-05022 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 2.45 Size(Acres): PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A ----- _ _ A 26 Q 1_! -;4 - ? - F'? 2612 '-`- ----1 Q n n 121 --' I /- J 27 a onun dwtio -- ' 28 41;r L 406-2 74 1- 1 1 '- Z ,1 i d j 409'I? 1 75 12 ? t 1 f ? 1 , _a p- ' 29Beach _ _ i s 1415 410 co 1 _-- 30 412 `-- -- `126 42177 i--''1 I I I I 1 ?? I 1 6?? 1_41S _ 31 42Y 420 2 1431 ] 8 i Q + 1 pA? 4 6 A 1T \ ! k i 3 e 32 , 143 `V 1 129' \ \'^ 1 Q 80 43)?--_1 S 4 % 03 \\ 34 1 1 / 430 Ap5 1 j i\ 1 j \ 35 - U \ ' Ve?u 133 % 1 36 A,Q acc o gms 85 4455 r--- 9 r? L ---r ve 88 J ccOOno 4110 r c ed dwellings P ?1 14` 11 .? e Overnight,, accompiodatlQns : Existing Surrounding Uses Map FLD2005-05047 Owner. TW/Beach Residences -Clearwater, LLC Case: TDR2005-05022 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 2.45 Size (Acres) : PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A 0 0 i a ?//r -da..r 1 View looking southwest at subject property View looking north at public parking and beach north of subject property (S. Gulfview Blvd. on right) 430 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 vd s?' !'an View looking west at sidewalk on public beach north of subject property View of overnight accommodation use to the northeast of subject property across S. Gulfview Blvd. 1 of 2 0 0 View looking east at commercial uses across S Gulfview Blvd. ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ a RI ¦I ¦I 51! View looking southeast at commercial uses across S. Gulfview Blvd. ¦ ¦ ¦I a r¦ rl 1 ¦ . ¦I a rl ? ¦I ¦ a ¦I ¦I ¦? ¦i ' S I' r 1. ? ?ra a'a View looking southwest at 440 West condominiums to View looking south at 440 West condominiums the southeast of subject property (showing proximity to the southeast of subject property (showing to hotel) both towers) 430 South Gulfview Boulevard 2 of 2 FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 ¦i10 ¦ r r° ° 1 0 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP I? /M 2,9' Planning III ?y RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard DATE: November 8, 2006 Attached is information related to the request by Ed Armstrong, on behalf of TWBeach Residences - Clearwater LLC, for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located a O1 411 and 4 1 outh Gulfview Boulevard. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on February 16, 2008. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted a six-month extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: 1. The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per dwelling unit. This project was originally approved with 196 parking spaces for 112 attached dwelling units (overall parking provided of 274 spaces less the required parking for 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units at one parking space per room/unit), at a parking ratio of 1.75 parking spaces per dwelling unit. The Minor Revision currently being reviewed provides 185 parking spaces for 112 attached dwelling units (overall parking provided of 264 spaces less 79 spaces dedicated to the hotel, but including 13 guest spaces), at a parking ratio of 1.65 parking spaces per dwelling unit. 2. Section 6-109.13 was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order June 20, 2006 Maps and Photos S: (Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications)Gulfview S 0430 TW Residences (7) - ApprovedIGulfview S 430 Time Extension Memorandum for 11.21.06 CDB.doc FVY: Boat on the rocks Sunda* Page 1 of 5 49 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 5:13 PM To: Yellin, Catherine Cc: Wagner, James Subject: RE: Boat on the rocks Sunday at former Adams Mark/Tw Residences Development 430 South Gulfview - Indigo Beach Residence James Wagner (562-4567) in Development Services. -----Original Message----- From: Yellin, Catherine Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Boat on the rocks Sunday at former Adams Mark/Tw Residences Development 430 South Gulfview - Indigo Beach Residence Anyone in particular I should contact? -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:57 AM To: Yellin, Catherine Subject: RE: Boat on the rocks Sunday at former Adams Mark/Tw Residences Development 430 South Gulfview - Indigo Beach Residence The survey I have for 430 South Gulfview does not show the pilings. Any survey or drawings for 440 South Gulfview would potentially be on microfilm in Development Services if at all. -----Original Message----- From: Yellin, Catherine Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:44 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Barrett, Earl Cc: Morris, William D. Subject: FW: Boat on the rocks Sunday at former Adams Mark/Tw Residences Development 430 South Gulfview - Indigo Beach Residence By any chance, do either of you know who owns the bottomland beyond the sea wall at 440 South Gulfview Blvd.? The owners at 430 do not think the concrete piling to their south belong to them. Wayne, you had a survey for 430, I presume because of the upland development. I need to find out about their neighbor to the south. -----Original Message----- From: Morris, William D. Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 3:03 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Yellin, Catherine Cc: Buysse, Beverly A. Subject: RE: Boat on the rocks Sunday at former Adams Mark/Tw Residences Development 430 South Gulfview - Indigo Beach Residence Wayne we are going with the safety first approach and will get them marked and worry about 9/18/2006 FW: Boat on the rocks Sunday • Page 2 of 5 ownership issues while the permit processing is taking place. Thanks, Bill M -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 1:38 PM To: Yellin, Catherine; Morris, William D. Cc: Buysse, Beverly A. Subject: Boat on the rocks Sunday at former Adams Mark/Tw Residences Development 430 South Gulfview - Indigo Beach Residence My legal opinion of the day is that I am not an attorney, but I see no correlation between a sanitary sewer easement and the need to maintain pilings (obviously this is a Legal question). Their site plans did not address anything waterward of the seawall, nor did the survey show the pilings. -----Original Message----- From: Yellin, Catherine Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 10:42 AM To: Morris, William D.; Wells, Wayne Cc: Buysse, Beverly A. Subject: RE: Boat on the rocks Sunday at former Adams Mark/Tw Residences Development 430 South Gulfview - Indigo Beach Residence I have spoken with Project Manager Tim Knight (tim.knight@us.taylorwoodrow.com) for the Indigo Beach Residence development at (941) 650-9022. He was under the impression that the submerged land and concrete pilings were owned by the city due to the easement the city has for sanitary sewer. The boundary survey included in project FLD2005-05047shows about half of the northern submerged property within this easement. According to Mr. Knight, they have no plans for the pilings, and he didn't think the southern pilings were in their property limits. Wayne, would you look at the boundary survey and tell us if the city having an easement would mean we are responsible for the pilings, or is that a legal matter? Bill? -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 4:52 PM To: Yellin, Catherine Cc: Morris, William D. Subject: RE: Boat on the rocks Sunday at former Adams Mark/Tw Residences Development Catherine - Based on the information from the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, the property is currently owned by TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater LLC, 877 Executive Center Drive, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2460. 1 would contact Jeff Handlin at 563-9882. I have looked at the survey for the property and they own submerged land beyond the seawall, what looks to be approximately 88 feet out from 9/18/2006 rW: Boat on the rocks Sunday, . Page 3 of 5 the seawall. The survey does not show any pilings in the water. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Yellin, Catherine Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 3:55 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Morris, William D. Subject: FW: Boat on the rocks Sunday at former Adams Mark/Tw Residences Development Wayne are you still the engineer associated with project FLD2005-05047? I have MSPA Acquisition II in Boston, Ma as the owner. I need to get hold of someone regarding the ownership of the cement pilings in the water behind 430 S. Gulfview. These either have to be removed, or be marked with permission of the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Can you help me with 1.) the owner of the bottomland where the pilings are and 2.) a contact name and number. I have a copy of the flexible development application from 2005, but am not sure if that information is current. -----Original Message----- From: Morris, William D. Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:43 PM To: Yellin, Catherine Subject: FW: Boat on the rocks Sunday We need to figure out who owns the property (Submerged lands) behind the Adams Mark Site. There are Cement pilings out into the water that are hazards and should probably be marked. You can see the cement pilings in the background of the picture taken this Sunday when we had a boat on the Clearwater Jetty... there is some speculation that the boat hit the submerged pilings in the dark at high tide when it left Shepards. -----Original Message----- From: Surette, Rob Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:02 PM To: Morris, William D. Subject: RE: Boat on the rocks Sunday I am supposed to be off on a sick day today. However, if the cement pilings are owned by the City, the City has a duty to notify the public of the danger. From: Morris, William D. Sent: Tue 9/5/2006 1:04 PM To: Surette, Rob Subject: RE: Boat on the rocks Sunday will do., Should I run a legal request through legal on all the 9/18/2006 FW: Boat on the rocks Sunday • Page 4 of 5 cement pilings behind the old Adams Mark property? They are just under the surface at high tide and exposed at low tide, they are not lit. The city made me put hazard lights on the outermost supports (Bents, pictured north of new bridge) we left in the water after we removed the old Causeway lift bridge. These cement piles are more of a hazard than the old bridge support pilings. -----Original Message----- From: Surette, Rob Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:52 PM To: Morris, William D. Subject: RE: Boat on the rocks Sunday Keep the CD for now. From: Morris, William D. Sent: Tue 9/5/2006 10:16 AM To: Surette, Rob Subject: FW: Boat on the rocks Sunday Rob, not sending this for any action, just so you know we had a unique case on Sunday involving a boat on the jetty. My Department was called by the PD, I went out and felt it was commercial salvage. I did not feel we could leave it on the rocks to attract kids, and/or break up and be a bigger problem with floating debris and possible pollution. I did not feel we could leave this so close to public access and wait for the owner to "handle it". I thought the PD on scene did an excellent job keeping the area clear and getting the towing company in to remove the boat. Do you want a CD with all the pictures? The PD took a few pictures as well. Bill M -----Original Message----- From: Morris, William D. Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:07 AM To: Irwin, Rod; Brumback, Garry; Horne, William; Buysse, Beverly A. Cc: Harriger, Sandy; Phillips, Sue; Yellin, Catherine; Willis, Michael Subject: Boat on the rocks Sunday Rod; this was called into the PD Saturday night as a stolen boat. The "operator" of the boat who called it in stolen from Shepards was reportedly rude and obnoxious with the PD Saturday evening. They ran his personal information and got back a history of DUI's. My Department got the call Sunday morning from the PD to "retrieve" the vessel. It was clearly a commercial salvage case, no bodies trapped or un-accounted for, just a wreck on the rocks. It was 30 feet off the seawall at the south end of Clearwater's south beach. It had been on the rocks pounding all night and had holes below the waterline on both sides. Kids were hanging around on the jetty to get on it the boat. If left unattended it would be a public nuisance and a public safety issue. The PD kept the area clear and people off the boat. It took several hours to determine the actual owner was out of 9/18/2006 „ FW: Boat on the rocks Sunday is Page 5 of 5 state and could not be reached. Technically it was the owners responsibility, the operator wanted the city to pull it off the rocks, float it (dewater it after plugging the holes and tow it to the launch ramp). The operator "had no money", commercial salvage from the water side would cost a couple of thousand dollars for a vessel virtually worthless. The operator was unwilling to take any responsibility and left the scene as soon as the boat was up on the seawall. The towing company hooked a cable and chains to it once the city PD "impounded" the vessel. The towing company decided to do it "for free" and go after the owner for their costs (estimated to be $800.00 by the owner of the towing company, estimated at $1,000.00 by the PD). The tow truck was able to easily pull the boat up the sloped rock jetty and over the seawall and across the sand. Once they had it safely on the sand I left and called Bill Horne to let him know it was removed from the Clearwater Jetty. The case brings up several issues that I will work with legal on. The county budgets for funds to remove derelict vessels, the revised state statue is not clear in instances where we know who the owner is but can't reach the owner. If we left the boat there we would have a public safety and possible pollution problem on our hands. I have a series of pictures will just send a few and burn the rest to a CD for future reference if needed. At no time was there any sheen or even the smell of gasoline. The interior of the boat was pretty well gutted. v/r, Bill M «22 foot boat on the Clearwater Beach Jetty.jpg>> <<Boat hooked up for the tow truck.jpg>> <<Boat on Seawall.jpg>> <<Boat safely on the sand.jpg>> 9/18/2006 r 1 r ?t 16 74f - ? ? Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:23 PM To: 'MTwitty@RealtyDecisions.com' Subject: RE: Enchantment & Indigo Beach Mike - These projects are not based on gross and saleable building floor area, but rather on the number of dwelling units and/or the number of overnight accommodation units/rooms. 1. Enchantment - Approved for 90 dwelling units. 2. Indigo Beach - Approved for 112 dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation units/rooms. I hope this answers your questions. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Michael Twitty [mailto:mtwitty@realtydecisions.comj Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:24 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Enchantment & Indigo Beach Hi Wayne & Happy New Year, I'm currently working on construction loan appraisals for several of the south Clearwater Beach projects. I was wondering if you are in receipt of the gross and saleable building areas permissible or approved within the following two projects: 1) Enchantment 2) Indigo Beach Thank you, Mike Michael T. Twitty State-Certified General Appraiser 1723 Vice President Entreken Associates, Inc. 1100 16th Street N St. Petersburg, FL 33705 Phone: (727) 894-1800 ext. 203 Fax: (727) 894-8916 Cell: (727) 504-5188 1/18/2006 No'fehpinellas: Safety put first last • Pagel of 3 Ak 6 T-, rnpa Bay's MARKETPLACT News sections Arts & Entertainment AP The Wire Business Citrus County Columnists Floridian Hernando County Hillsborough Letters Movies Neighborhood Times News Update North Pinellas North of Tampa Obituaries Opinion Pasco County South Pinellas Sports State Tampa Bay TV Times World & Nation Find your local news section Weekly sections Brandon Times City Times Place an ad Calendars Classified Forums Sports Weather i Usti ?i to and clownlaad r, ,r s all tlf' muk iO You warrL 1 1 ® E-mail Print Lr Subscribe to the this article this article St. Petersburg Times Safety put first in blast Everyone within 1,000 feet of the Adam's Mark Hotel will be asked to move before its implosion Saturday. By TAMARA EL-KHOURY Published October 6, 2005 CLEARWATER - Saturday's demolition of the Adam's Mark Hotel promises both a nuisance and an awesome sight for beach residents and visitors. The implosion is anticipated to take place about 7 a.m. To prepare, city officials will close roads and evacuate buildings within 1,000 feet of the hotel. In all, an estimated 200 people will be asked to leave their residences, hotel rooms or businesses, Clearwater Fire Marshal Joel Gray said. Those who stay do so at their own risk. The 14-story Adam's Mark Hotel is being demolished to make way for luxury condominiums. British developer Taylor Woodrow paid $31.5- million for the Adam's Mark site with its 2.45 acres of prime gulffront. The developer plans to replace the hotel with a West Indies-style project with 113 condos and 78 hotel rooms. D.H. Griffin, the contractor for the demolition, has been preparing the building for Saturday's blast for two months, said Bill Rose, the company's regional manager. The interior of the 217-room Adam's Mark building was stripped, and the mattresses, beds and sheets were shipped to hurricane victims in Biloxi, Miss. Contractors chose to implode the building because it's quicker, safer and less of a nuisance than using a wrecking ball, Rose said. Mayor Frank Hibbard is set to push the button (from 1,000 feet away) 0154 Z 53ii l?tUs ws?? 3 ?LL .=1 i I'?eV ?1 In t1i Ta l http://www.sptimes.com/2005/10/06/Northpinellas/Safety-Put_first_in b.shtml 10/7/2005 sptimes.com Text-only NAhpinellas: Safety put first6last • Page 2 of 3 Homes that will set off the explosions of about 85 linear-shape charges placed on Ads by( Outdoors four different floors of the hotel building. Perspective Intern, Personal Tech The charges will cut through the steel beams "like a knife through butter" charit, Sunday Money and a controlled implosion should result, Rose said. Spons, Tampa Bay Helps Business Health It should take about 15 seconds from the time the charges go off until the Educa Taste building is on the ground, he said. WAW.Ch Travel Weekend Xpress Film crews from the History Channel's Modern Marvels program will Special Sections film the preparation of the explosion to update a sequence they did on Charit Arena football implosion technology, Rose said. Fundr. Buccaneers We He college football D.H. Griffin workers will help wrap air conditioning units on the tops of Raise 90% P Devil Rays roofs near the hotel. Gulfview Boulevard will open once the dust and Money Lightning debris from the blast is cleared off. www.Ab Police reports Schools "It's one day of interruption for some folks; for others it's just a day to go Seniority out there and watch something you've never seen before," Rose said. Yellow Pages Discos Subscriber Services Subscribe Nearby, one of the two 17-story 440 West Condominium buildings will Great Renew be evacuated, said Sam Vazquez, community association manager. He Items eBay e Help said the residential rate is low right now and estimates that about 60 www.eB Advertise Place an ad people will have to evacuate the north building, which has 118 units. In print he said. About 20 cars will have to be moved from the parking lot Online , Market Info Join Us Residents have been notified and given passes by contractors D.H. Griffin Charit Internships to watch the demolition from a seated viewing area on the beach, Co. Inforrr Scholarships Times Jobs , Vazquez said. Instant chariti( contact us Sear& "It's a once-in-a-lifetime thing that they're going to be able to watch it, and re and they're kind of looking forward to it," Vazquez said. "We may have www.F:41 to stage another one in the near future to get the ball rolling." Gulfview Boulevard will be closed from Hamden Drive to Coronado Drive from about 4:30 a.m. until three to four hours after the explosion, Gray said. Hamden Drive and Coronado Drive will be closed from 6:30 a.m. to about 7:30 a.m., Gray said. Message boards notifying people of street closures will go up today The Coast Guard, Clearwater Fire/Rescue Marine Unity and Sheriffs Office will keep boaters and swimmers at least 1,000 feet from shore. Gawkers are urged to watch from Pier 60. Guests at the Red Roof Inn at 421 S Gulfview Blvd. were told they could stay indoors but to keep their windows shut and their air conditioning turned off so dust isn't ventilated into their rooms, said manager Kathy Mittler. "We're going to make sure everybody knows about it," Mittler said. "If http://www.sptimes.com/2005/10/06/Northpinellas/Safety--Put_first_in_b.shtml 10/7/2005 Noithpinellas: Safety put first last • Page 3 of 3 they just want to sleep through it, they'll probably have a wake up call at 7 a.m. when it goes off." Pat Martinelli, 73, lives at 800 Gulfview Blvd. S and said officials should do a better job of notifying people of the explosion. She said her friend who is staying in one of the 440 West Condominium buildings hadn't been told what to expect. "Warn the people that this is going to happen so they're not shocked out of their beds," she said. "With terrorism and all that stuff, how do you know which one is which?" [Last modified October 6, 2005, 01:14:18] North Pinellas headlines w Avenue's growth may be around corner ? Fourth-grader dares to become hero Safety_,.p.u....t..firstn.___b„last Two,__d,own._._.-.._still,_._one.._more_to.._.go Belleair_okays rule to preserve historic sites ? Police seek man in sexual assault Guest column w You all gave almost $2-million for library Running Defending champ sets an early pace Letters to the Editor: Families, not government should tend cemetery I Past 14 Days J Go BACK TO TOP © 2005 • All Rights Reserved • St. Petersburg Times 490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727- 893-8111 Contact the Times I Privacy Polite Standard of Accuracy I Terms Conditions & Copyright http://www.sptimes.com/2005/10/06/Northpinellas/Safety-Put_first_in_b.shtml 10/7/2005 f R% Status - Adam's Mark Pro* • Page 1 of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Bruch, Tracey Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:30 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott; Quillen, Michael Subject: RE: Status - Adam's Mark Project Maybe they will need a specific easement for the fire lane on city property as it is not noted below. From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wed 9/21/2005 11:25 AM To: Rice, Scott; Quillen, Michael; Bruch, Tracey Subject: RE: Status - Adam's Mark Project Scott/Mike/Tracey - The conditions of the Development Order relative to the City owned property to the north of the Adams Mark property were: 6. That all City approvals and easements necessary for the sidewalk connection to the sidewalk on City property to the north be obtained prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion; 7. That the applicant obtain all right-of-way, easements or other legal instruments prior to the issuance of building permits for the installation of any landscaping and irrigation on the City property north of the subject property; Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 10:37 AM To: Quillen, Michael; Bruch, Tracey Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Status - Adam's Mark Project The site plan for the project has been approved by the CDB and a Development Order issued. Nothing has been submitted to me following our meeting regarding the fire lane and impact of the project on the south end of our parking lot. Our condition on this was that any modifications to City parking lot shall be approved by the City Engineer. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- 11/27/2005 P-0 Status - Adam's Mark Proi • Page 2 of 3 From: Quillen, Michael Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 10:25 AM To: Bruch, Tracey Cc: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Status - Adam's Mark Project I assume we can have input, but if this is the only realistic location for fire access it may not help. Scott- What is the status of their plan, have they resubmitted anything? Do they show any public parking spaces in the garage? -----Original Message----- From: Bruch, Tracey Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 7:03 PM To: Quillen, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Status - Adam's Mark Project Mike; Do we have any input on allowing a required fire lane for the Adam's Mark to be put on city property. i.e., the south gulfview parking lot. This limits what we can ever do with that footprint? tb -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 6:54 PM To: Bruch, Tracey Subject: RE: Status - Adam's Mark Project It was my understanding that revisions were going to be made. However, I do not recollect when they were going to submit them and into what process. It is also my understanding that the Fire Marshall Joel Gray made the call regarding the fire lane on the City's property and am unclear whom he consulted (other City staff) when making that decision. -----Original Message----- From: Bruch, Tracey Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 2:51 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: Wells, Wayne; Quillen, Michael Subject: Status - Adam's Mark Project At the 8/5/05 meeting we had with the developer, I was under the impression they were going to resubmit a plan with a redesign so it would not affect the operation and design of the adjacent public parking lot. Has this been submitted yet? My concern was the impact to our current operation and most importantly the ability to do anything in the future with this property if the bldg.'s fire lane is on city property (i.e., future development of a parking facility, etc.). 11/27/2005 PE: Status - Adam's Mark Pro* • Page 3 of 3 Thanks, Tracey Tracey Bruch, Parking Manager (727) 562-4771 tracey.bruch@myclearwater.com 11/27/2005 Experience tLive the views...Indigo Beach Residences & Suites BREATHTAKING VIEWS OF THE GULF OF MEXICiOI, CLEARIqATER BEACH AND ClE11RWA7ER BAY inDIGO BEACH RESIDENCES & SUITES t _x Shimmering high above the pristine beaches and translucent gulf waters of Clearwater Beach, Indigo Beach evokes cool Caribbean elegance. Its West Indies architectural theme features a fresh interpretation of colonial island sophistication. Indigo is a 15-story beachfront condominium tower featuring 112 luxuriously appointed beach residences with sweeping views of Clearwater Beach, Clearwater Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. In addition, Indigo offers 78 fully furnished luxury designer condominium hotel suites. Casual yet cultured. Private yet social. Dynamic yet deeply relaxing. That's Indigo Beach Residences and Suites on the white sands of Clearwater Beach. Teo-andm beachfront condominium residences your Weekend Getaway, AU Week Long from $1 S1 million to over er $2.5 million. • Condo-hotel suites from the mid $300s. 430 South Gulfview Blvd • Clearwater Beach, Florida • 33767 mwJndigobuch tom 727-441-8323/800-446-3057 `Taylor Woodrow REPRESENTATIONS CANNOT BE RELIED UPON AS CORRECTLY STATING THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE DEVELOPER. FOR CORRECT Developed by Indigo Beach LL.C., ESENTATIONS, REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE 70 THE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY SECTION 718.503, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO BE an affiliate of Taylor Woodrow, plc, on the site of the former Adam's 15HED BY A DEVELOPER TO A BUYER OR LESSEE Mark Hotel directly on the white sands of Clearviiater Beach. r . r tf r ?e } r I' r r r " r rr tiT r r r i ?t T f6 ri? a W I? a. r MEMORANDUM 0 TO: Members of the Community Developm nt Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP WM V DATE: August 16, 2005 RE: FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard After further discussions with the applicant and the City Attorney, the conditions of approval are modified as follows (only Condition #4 has changed from that listed in the Staff Report): Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That use of the property be for a maximum of 112 dwelling units, including eight units through the Transfer of Development Rights, and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units. The retail sales and services have been eliminated from the proposal; 3. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That occupancy by owners of units in the southern building be limited to sixty (60) days in any calendar year. Further, units in the southern building shall be offered or advertised as being available for rental to the public as overnight accommodations when not in use by the owner. At the request of the City Manager or designee, records of the rentals conducted for or by the owners of units shall be made available for examination to determine compliance with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines and/or any other enforcement afforded by City regulations. A license for the facility must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, shall be maintained. Units within this portion of the development shall not be used for any purpose other than overnight accommodations and shall not qualify for homestead exemption nor as a residential unit which can be used for voter registration, motor vehicle registration, Pinellas County public school registration or home or business occupational licenses; 5. That the sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 6. That all City approvals and easements necessary for the sidewalk connection to the sidewalk on City property to the north be obtained prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion; 7. That the applicant obtain all right-of-way, easements or other legal instruments prior to the issuance of building permits for the installation of any landscaping and irrigation on the City property north of the subject property; Memorandum to Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 1 of 2 0 0 8. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 9. That fencing within the visibility triangles and waterfront visibility triangles be brought into compliance with Code provisions prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. Fence height increases above that otherwise permitted and alternate fence materials shall only be allowed (1) in the waterfront visibility triangle if a letter of "no objection" is submitted from the adjacent condominium association board and (2) in the visibility triangle if acceptable to the Engineering Department; 10. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625-627 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625- 627 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625-627 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 11. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 12. That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 13. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 14. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 15. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 16. That all construction comply with FEMA requirements; 17. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 18. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Gulfview S 0430 TW Residences (T) - 8.16.05 CDB - W W\Memorandum to CDB re amended conditions 8.16.05.doc Memorandum to Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 2 of 2 ORIGINAL CDB Meeting Date: August 16, 2005 Case Numbers: FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 Agenda Item: F9 Owner/Applicant: TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC Representative: E. D. Armstrong III, q., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP Address: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUESTS: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 112 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units, 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 square feet of retail sales with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to six feet (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to eight feet from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, two dwelling units from 625-627 Bay Esplanade, two dwelling units from 665 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 -Page 1 of. 13 EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R); Residential LAND USE: Facilities High (RFH) and Recreation/Open Space (R/OS) Categories PROPERTY SIZE: 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District: 0.58 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodation use (217 rooms/units) Proposed Use: Mixed use of 112 attached dwellings (condominiums) and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Open Space/Recreation District; Public beach LAND USES: East: Tourist District; Overnight accommodation uses, retail sales and restaurants South: Tourist District; Attached dwellings West: Preservation District; Gulf of Mexico CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is tourist-dominated area with a mixture of attached dwellings (condominium), overnight accommodation uses and tourist-oriented commercial uses. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.58 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) site is located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach. The site has approximately 235 feet of frontage on South Gulfview Boulevard (east) and 296 feet of frontage on the Gulf of Mexico (west). This parcel is currently developed with a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use (Adam's Mark Clearwater Beach Resort) in a building 155 feet in height. The hotel is currently closed due to damage sustained during Hurricane Jeanne in September 2004. Attached dwellings (condominiums) exist adjacently to the southeast. This area is a tourist-dominated area due to the site's proximity to the public beach. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board approved a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217-room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units are permitted today) and for height to allow the existing 155-foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today) and Flexible Development approval for the overnight accommodation use (Case Nos. FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016), with 10 conditions: 1. That any voluntary demolition of this existing building shall not vest the existing height of 155 feet. Any future reconstruction requires compliance with current Code height requirements; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 2 of 13 0 0 3. That the sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 4. That all City approvals and easements necessary for the sidewalk connection for handicap accessibility to the sidewalk on City property to the north be obtained prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion; 5. That prior to the issuance of any permits, site and building plans be revised to show the removal of, and the striping out of, the two southern parking spaces on the west side of the porte cochere as a "no parking" area, acceptable to the Engineering Department; 6. That fencing within the visibility triangles and waterfront visibility triangles be brought into compliance with Code provisions prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. Fence height increases above that otherwise permitted and alternate fence materials shall only be allowed (1) in the waterfront visibility triangle if a letter of "no objection" is submitted from the adjacent condominium association board and (2) in the visibility triangle if acceptable to the Engineering Department; 7. That the City, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion, approve the sidewalk cafe on the west side; 8. That the monument-style freestanding sign not exceed six feet in height, meet a five-foot setback.from property lines and include the site address; 9. That all construction comply with FEMA requirements; and 10. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Proposal: The proposal is to demolish the existing hotel and reconstruct the property as a mixed use of 112 attached dwellings (condominiums) and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units. The proposed building will have three floors of parking, with portions of Levels 2 and 3 designed with dwellings along the northern and eastern edges. There are two towers proposed, one a residential tower in the shape of an "L" with the legs along the north and west sides of the site and the other an overnight accommodation tower in the southeast portion of the site. The applicant is requesting to Terminate the Status of a Nonconformity for density, for the purpose of converting a portion of the existing overnight accommodation units/rooms to dwelling units. It is noted that the application was advertised for 112 dwelling units, 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 square feet of retail sales area (equivalent to two dwelling units). It has been determined that a portion of the retail sales areas proposed, which would constitute outdoor retail sales and display, is prohibited by Beach by Design and the other retail sales portion is located on the ground floor, in violation of FEMA regulations. Based on these determinations and in order to comply with Code Termination and Transfer of Development Rights provisions, the applicant is withdrawing the retail sales portion of the request and reducing the number of dwelling units being transferred onto this site from 10 to eight dwelling units. There will be no change to the number of dwelling units proposed (1.12 dwelling units), however, based on the conversion factor from overnight accommodations to dwelling units, this conversion under the Termination provisions is now 104 dwelling units. Based on the maximum allowable density of 40 rooms/units per acre for the RFH land use category and the 1.87 acres zoned Tourist, the site could be developed today with only 74 overnight accommodation rooms/units or 56 dwelling Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 3 of 13 0 0 units. Under the Termination of the Status of Nonconformity provisions, there are four required improvements: 1. Installation of perimeter buffers. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Improvement of off-street parking lots. The applicant is removing all existing improvements and is providing parking that meets Code provisions. 3. Removal of nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures. The applicant is removing all existing nonconforming signs and other accessory structures under this proposal. 4. Use of Comprehensive Sign Program and Comprehensive Landscape Programs to satisfy requirements. The Comprehensive Sign Program may be utilized in the future, but has not been submitted as part of the application package. The Comprehensive Landscape Program is not necessary with this proposal. The request is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project due primarily to the proposal being a "mixed use," which is not a use permitted in the Tourist District, the proposed setbacks, the proposed height being greater than 100 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street. The criteria for attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and retail sales prohibit direct access to an arterial street. South Gulfview Boulevard is an arterial street, the site has no other means of street access and the proposal provides driveway access to it, much as the existing overnight accommodation use presently has a driveway to access this site. The proposal includes reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to six feet (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to trash staging area) and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to eight feet from the CCCL (to building). With the total redesign of this site, the applicant is significantly increasing the amount of site landscaping, increasing the pervious area from 10 to 36 percent. Section 3-905.A requires setbacks to be measured from the CCCL. The application has been advertised including side and rear setback reductions from the CCCL. The project, however, has been designed with the building set back from the side property line a minimum of 13 feet and a minimum of 20 feet from the seawall (which is the edge of the Tourist District, whereas the rear property line extends into the water). Setback reductions are otherwise to the trash staging area in the southeast corner of the property. Trash collection rooms are being provided on the ground floor. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging areas within the front setback is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site. The project has been designed with both residential units and overnight accommodation units as a "mixed use." These uses have been separated by function into two towers on the site. As stated earlier, the proposed building will have three floors of parking, with portions of Levels 2 and 3 designed with dwellings along the northern and eastern edges, with 10 dwelling units on Level 2 and 11 dwelling units on Level 3. There are two towers proposed, one a residential tower in the shape of an "L" with the legs along the north and west sides of the site and the other an overnight Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 4 of 13 0 0 accommodation tower in the southeast portion of the site. Level 4, which is the amenity level with a club for the residents, separate pools for the residences and the hotel and other recreational facilities, will have seven dwelling units in the residential tower and one hotel unit in the hotel tower. In the residential tower, there are nine dwelling units each on Levels 5 - 10, eight dwelling units on Level 11, six dwelling units each on Levels 12 - 13 and five dwelling units on Levels 14 - 15. In the hotel tower, there are eleven rooms/units on Levels 5 - 11. The residential building has been designed stepped or tiered horizontally at various levels on both the eastern and southern legs of the building, reducing the bulk of the building and presenting a more aesthetically pleasing building. The building will be of West Indes architecture, with barrel tile roofing, stucco walls, decorative aluminum and glass railings and decorative aluminum entry gates, grillwork and trellises. The proposal includes increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck). The residential buildings to the south (440 West) are 157 feet in height. The hotel building was designed to not exceed 100 feet in order to comply with Beach by Design requirements regarding separation between buildings over 100 feet in height. The tiering of the proposed residential building has been designed to comply with the Beach by Design and the Transfer of Development Rights 100-foot separation distance between buildings over 100 feet in height. The heights of both the residential and hotel towers are consistent and compatible with the heights of adjacent properties. This site is located within the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design, which is indicated as a distinctive area of mixed use, including high-rise condominiums. For structures within 500 feet to the southeast, the proposed residential tower is separated by 186 feet (100 feet allowable), whereby there are not more than two buildings 100 feet in height located within 500 feet of each other. The additional height for the decorative mansard architectural embellishments will hide various rooftop mechanical equipment and will provide proportion to the buildings with the "tiered" appearance with separated rooftops. Portions of the increased height will provide proper clearance for elevator equipment. The design of this project creates a form and function that will be consistent with and enhance the character of this area. Based on the proposal, including the change in use to 112 attached dwellings and the 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units, and the elimination of the retail sales areas, 246 parking spaces are required for this development. The applicant is providing 274 parking spaces, including two spaces dedicated for taxis for the hotel use. The proposal includes a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet. The site has been designed with two driveway accesses on South Gulfview Boulevard, with the southern driveway primarily dedicated to the hotel use and the northern driveway dedicated to upper floor parking for the residential use. The driveway separation requested is necessary to provide safe and efficient access for the residents and guests of this property and is acceptable to the Engineering Department. Sidewalk connections on the north side to a sidewalk on City property is proposed to allow residents and guests safe access to the beach and Beach Walk facilities. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 5 of 13 Beach by Design calls for the construction of 10-foot wide sidewalks along major roads for pedestrian safety and convenience. The site plans indicate compliance with this requirement. However, with the construction of Beach Walk improvements, and to ensure consistency of sidewalk design (along with any landscape or street lighting improvements), the applicant will need to work with the City toward meeting the City design specifications. Approval of this request should be conditioned on compliance with these specifications and to allow for an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction of the sidewalk within the right-of-way. The application has been advertised with a Transfer of Development Rights of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, two dwelling units from 625-627 Bay Esplanade, two dwelling units from 665 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade. The application was erroneously advertised transferring two dwelling units from 625-627 Bay Esplanade, where the proposal is to only transfer one dwelling unit from this sending site. With the elimination of the retail sales from this proposal and compliance with the Termination provisions, the transfer of the two units from 665 Bay Esplanade are being eliminated from this request. Based on 1.87 acres zoned Tourist District, the density for the residential portion is 59.89 dwelling units per acre, and 41.71 rooms/units per acre for the hotel portion. Due to the demolition of the existing building on this site, all signage will be required to be brought into compliance with Code requirements. The maximum height in the Tourist District for a freestanding sign is four feet, unless approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program for a six- foot high sign. Any approval of this application should require any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913), Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2-803.C) and Transfer of Development Rights (Section 4-1402) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement cases for this property. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 6 of 13 • • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803.C): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 112 attached dwellings X** DENSITY (40 rooms/ (condominiums), 78 overnight units per acre - 74 accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 rooms/units max.; 30 square feet of retail sales dwellings per acre - 56 dwellings max.) (217 rooms/units existing)* MAXIMUM FAR 0.04 X (max. 1.0 FAR IMPERVIOUS 0.64 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (0.95 maximum LOT AREA (20,000 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned X sq. ft. minimum) Tourist District: 0.58 acres zoned O en S ace/Recreation District) LOT WIDTH '(100 - 235 linear feet along South Gulfview X 150 feet minimum Boulevard FRONT SETBACK Six feet (to patios/seating areas) and X** (10-15 feet) zero feet (to trash staging area) REAR SETBACK Eight feet from the CCCL (to X** (10-20 feet) building) SIDE SETBACK North: five feet from the Coastal X** (0-10 feet) Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and four feet (to pavement) South: two feet (to trash staging area) HEIGHT (35-100 feet) 100 feet for the overnight X** accommodation tower and 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 feet for arch. embellishments (from roof deck) PARKING SPACES 274 spaces X (one space per room, 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit & five spaces per 1,000 sf retail) (261 spaces req.) * Based on 1.87 acres zoned Tourist. ** See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 7 of 13 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.0: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 8 of 13 • 0 COMPLIANCE, WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS STANDARDS (Section 4-1403): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not X reduce the fair market value of abutting property. 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of X Clearwater. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with X adjacent land uses. 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will X upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which X enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS 1. The subject 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District: 0.58 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) is located within the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is for a 217-room hotel (which is nonconforming to current density maximums of 74 rooms or 56 dwelling units), at a building height of 155 feet Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 9 of 13 (which is nonconforming to current maximum building heights of 150 feet) and with 201 parking spaces (198 spaces within a parking garage and three spaces at the porte cochere on the north side of the building, where 217 spaces are required under current Code regulations); 3. The site is located adjacently south of Clearwater Beach and the Beach Walk District of Beach by Design; 4. The hotel is currently closed due to damage sustained during Hurricane Jeanne in September 2004; 5. The proposal includes the demolition of the existing hotel building and all existing site improvements; 6. The proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity to allow the conversion of 139 of the existing overnight accommodation units/rooms to 104 dwelling units; 7. The applicant is requesting the Transfer of Development Rights of eight dwelling units to this site; 8. While reductions to setbacks to building and pavement are requested, these reductions are less than the setbacks to building and pavement for the existing development; 9. The proposed building height of 150 feet for the residential tower bears a reasonable relationship between the number of units being transferred through the Transfer of Development Rights and the proposed height; 10. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development, and will enhance the character of the immediate vicinity; and 11. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density complies with the criteria of Section 6-109; 2. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 4. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Transfer of Development Rights per Section 3-1403; 5. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 6. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 30, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6- 109; (2) Flexible Development application to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 10 of 13 0 0 feet to six feet (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to eight feet from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional six feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402, for the site at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density per Section 6-109; 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 4. The proposal complies with the Transfer of Development Rights per Section 3-1403; 5. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That use of the property be for a maximum of 112 dwelling units, including eight units through the Transfer of Development Rights, and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units. The retail sales and services have been eliminated from the proposal; 3. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That the use of that portion of the property for overnight accommodations meet the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 days, where occupancy of rooms/units arise from a rental agreement, other agreement or the payment of consideration. At the request of the City Manager or designee, the records of the business shall be made available for examination to determine whether the length of stay complies with these provisions. Failure. to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines, revocation of the occupational license and/or any other enforcement afforded by law or by City regulations. A license must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, shall be maintained. This portion of the site development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 11 of 13 0 0 individual dwelling units, nor shall rooms/units in the overnight accommodations qualify for homestead exemption or home or business occupational licenses; 5. That the sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 6. That all City approvals and easements necessary for the sidewalk connection to the sidewalk on City property to the north be obtained prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion; 7. That the applicant obtain all right-of-way, easements or other legal instruments prior to the issuance of building permits for the installation of any landscaping and irrigation on the City property north of the subject property; 8. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 9. That fencing within the visibility triangles and waterfront visibility triangles be brought into compliance with Code provisions prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. Fence height increases above that otherwise permitted and alternate fence materials. shall only be allowed (1) in the waterfront visibility triangle if a letter of "no objection" is submitted from the adjacent condominium association board and (2) in the visibility triangle if acceptable to the Engineering Department; 10. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625-627 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625-627 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, 625-627 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 11. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 12. That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 13. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 12 of 13 • s 14. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 15. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 16. That all construction comply with FEMA requirements; 17. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 18. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: ka., tj.(VM Wayn M. Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: (Planning Department)C D BIFLEX (FLD)Wending cases )Up for the next CDBIGulfview S 0430 TW Residences (T) - 8.16.05 CDB - WMGulfview S 0430 Staff Report (TW Residences).doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Cases FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 - Page 13 of 13 Case Number: FLD2005-05047 -- 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Fw*l x:35 pm Owner(s): M S P A Acquisition Ii C/O Morgan Stanley Re Funds New York, Ny 10036 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Tw/ Beach Residence-Clearwater.Llc 877 Executive Center Dr W 205 St Petersburg, F133702 Lsmgp?as TELEPHONE: 727-563-9882, FAX: 727-563-9674, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-441-8617, E-MAIL: ed@jpfirm.com Location: 2.45 acres located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach. Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 112 attached dwelling units, 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 square feet of retail sales with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to x feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to x feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to eight feet from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, two dwelling units from 625-627 Bay Esplanade, two dwelling units from 665 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood 440 West, Inc. Condominium Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 440 S Gulfview Blvd #203 TELEPHONE: 461-2885, FAX: 442-6628, E-MAIL: et440@juno.com Neighborhood Continental Towers Association(s): Cleawater, F133767 675 S Gulfview #1002 TELEPHONE: 727-449-9189, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: fandjnassif@webtv.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff. Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Downs-Blackburn, Tom Glenn Applicant: Ed Armstrong, Jayne Sears, O.C. Cabrera, Ed Mazur, Rick Gillette, Joe Burdette, Jeff Hanlon, Phil Graham Other: Norma. Carlough The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 35 1. Southern driveway apron shall not extend beyond extended side property line. 2. Brick paver driveway aprons not consistent with Beach Walk template. 3. Proposed sidewalk shall include 4x8 concrete paver band as shown on Beach Walk Sheet No. HD-11. Conduits or sleeves shall be installed beneath these pavers to provide for irrigation and/or electric power. 4. Palm trees shall be installed in the ROW in accordance with Beach Walk Sheet Nos. LS-2 and LS-3. 5. Proposed modifications to City parking lot would impact City irrigation system. 6. All landscaping/hardscaping shall be coordinated with Beach Walk design. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Applicant shall obtain a separate right-of-way permit for the brick paver driveway and driveways shall be constructed in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #113. 2. Need to show all city details applicable to this project. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www.myclearwater.com/engineer, go to "Documents and Publications", then to Engineering Construction Standards, then select the applicable details. 3. Need to install a gate valve on both sides of proposed backflow device(s). 4. Street lateral manhole connection and cleanout shall be installed in compliance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Indices #302 and #304 respectively. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application Environmental: 1 . 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. 2. Please submit sea turtle friendly lighting design and installation details prior to building permit. (per Development Code; Section 3-1302-d and City Or.6928-02) Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 36 I . This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any cons •on plans or documents other than site work. 2. Show on the plan fire hydrant(s) withing 300 ft of the most remote point of the building, as the hose is laid. Due to the dimensions of the building(s) more than one hydrant may be necessary.Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Any ramps over vaults which fire or emergency vehicles might be expected to travel must be designed to HS-25 specifications. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Building(s) to be protected by NFPA-13 fire sprinkler system. FDC must be at least 15 ft off the building and within 40 of a hydrant dedicated to the fire sprinkler system. Due to the size and dimensions of the proposed building(s) more than the one hydrant shown may be necessary. If there is to be more than one sprinkler system, an FDC and hydrant dedicated to the sprinkler system are required. Please respond and provide additional information PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Provide a standpipe water suply with 2 1/2 inch connection and 1 1/2 inch adaptor with breakable cover and chain within 100 feet of any pier/land intersection. As per NFPA-303. Please respond to this commet and show rear hydrant on the plans PRIOR TO CDB. 6, Note: From the preliminary plans submitted for this DRC site plan review, the proposed building appears to be a high rise and will be required to meet the requirements of the high rise package including but not limited to fire command room, voice evacuation fire alarm, pressurized stairwells, enclosed elevator lobbies, fire fighter phones, etc. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 7. All drain covers and grates in drive aisles must meet the requirements of HS-20 specifications. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 8. Clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of each fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 9. Clearance of 7 1/2 feet to the front, sides and rear of each FDC are required to be maintained. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 10. 6/27/05 Fire command room shall be above BFE (base flood elevation). 11 . 6/27/05 Provide FDC for Standpipe. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 , The tree survey and inventory is incomplete. There is a row of trees behind tree numbers 31 through 40. Include these trees prior to Building Permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 37 1 . Per Section 3-1200D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicuar and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Show such curbing on Sheet 3/13 and the landscaping plans, with details, for the driveways on the north and east, including the south side of the taxi parking spaces. 2. Provide a landscape plan for the landscaping on the ground level and a separate landscape plan for the landscaping on the platform level, as it is very difficult to review what is on the platform above versus on the ground, especially in regard to the height of trees in relation to building overhangs. 3. Unclear as to note on Sheet L-2 stating "no planting improvements seaward of the CCCL line west of the building." Plans indicate plantings within the CCCL on the north side, if it is a concern. However, there is no Code restriction on plantings within the CCCL. 4. Indicate the location of sod on Sheet L-2 and provide construction details for such. 5. Landscape improvements, including irrigation, is proposed on City property to the north. Who will maintain and whose irrigation is it that is proposed on our property (Adam's Mark irrigation or ours)? Provide explanation/details. 6. Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Dimension the depth from the front property line of the landscaped areas east of the retail/lobby area and either side of the fountain on the north portion. These areas will be counted toward the foundation landscaping requirement. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide a copy of approved SWFWMD permit or exemption to Development Services. Solid Waste: 1 . To many units for roll out service The hotel will produce much more waste then the condos please consider a compactor for your solid waste needs. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 38 1.The proposed northern driveway and resulting modifications to the ity parking lot exit would negatively impact the operation of the City lot and shall not be permitted. The proposed modifications involve the loss of one of the existing pay stations. A motorist wishing to enter the development parking lot would be required to enter the City lot, take a pay ticket and circle the lot to gain access to the development lot. The City lot is closed at certain times (lot full - nights) thereby eliminating access to the development lot. 2.How will proposed gates be operated? 3.Are the public spaces going to be free or metered? If metered please show parking meters or a means of payment. 4.The vertical clear height of parking garage must be 8'2". Show across section of parking garage showing pipes and other structures that may impede in this height requirement. 5.The covered hotel drop off area must meet ADA requirements of 114 inches clear vertical height. 6.H/C parking spaces must be strategically placed to nearest accessible entrance i.e. elevators. 7.Remove walls that impede motorists line of sight when backing out of parking spaces. 8.Spacing between driveways must be a minimum of 125'. (Community Development Code Section 3-102.D.1.) 9.Where will moving vans and trucks stage when loading or unloading large household items? IO.Where will delivery trucks stage for commercial/retail deliveries? I I.Provide a diagram showing a standard passenger car (18' long) making the turns at all corners of the parking garage and porte-cochere. The turning vehicle must not encroach in the opposing lane. 12.Demonstrate accessible path from public sidewalk to the site's accessible entrance and from building A to building B. 13. Civil Site Plan Sheet 3 of 13 indicates columns obstructing the south drive aisle. This drive aisle shall be 24'-wide and clear of obstructions. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: General note: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 39 0 0 Under the prior application FLD2005-01005, the site data indicated th t area to be 106,500 square feet (2.444 acres), with 81,017 square feet of upland (1.859 acres) zoned Tourist (T) and 25,483 square feet of submerged land (0.585 acre) zoned Open Space/Recreation (OS/R). Under the present application, the site data indicates the lot area to be 97,574 square feet (2.239 acres, but stated on the Site Plan as 2.45 acres) and 81,450 square feet of upland (1.869 acres). Revise the lot area acreage on the Cover Sheet. Unclear as to the reduction in the overall lot area by 8,926 square feet (which appears to be in submerged land)? Need to correct the overall lot acreage if the 97,574 square feet is correct. Also unclear why in the Legal Description on the Cover Sheet the land area is indicated as 106,504.22 square feet, which is not listed anywhere else on the site data. 2. Show or indicate the location of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701). 3 . Show or indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. 4. Provide the floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses as part of the land use data on Civil cover sheet. 5 . Revise the Landscape Plan Sheet L-1 to show sight visibility triangles according to Code requirements. 6. A Comprehensive Landscape Program has been submitted, but has not detailed what requirements of the Code are being asked to be modified or waived. There are no landscape buffers or interior landscape area required by this proposal. Advise as to the reason for the submittal or remove the application. 7. A letter has been submitted as to the color scheme proposed. On the building elevations, please indicate the different Areas 1-3 so there is no confusion as to the Areas proposed. 8 . Provide color samples/chips of the proposed exterior building colors. 9. Based on the acreage submitted and approved under FLD2005-01009 of 0.259 acres (11,292 square feet), which produces only seven dwelling units maximum (based on 30 du/acre), revise the TDR application on Page 2 for the "size of site" and "number of development rights allocated to this site" for the sender site. Note: Under FLD2005-01009, this sender site was approved for five dwelling units. 10. Revise Page 2 of the TDR application for 667 Bay Esplanade (sender site) to show the "site of site" as 0.269 acre and the number of "development rights allocated to this site" as eight dwelling units. 11 . Revise the proposed density on the Cover Sheet to provide the residential density (113 dwelling units), the overnight accommodation density (78 rooms) and the floor area ratio (for the 2,910 square-foot retail portion). 12. Recommend providing two parking spaces per dwelling unit. 13. Pursuant to Section 3-905.A, setbacks shall be measured from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). Provide the proposed rear (west) and side (north) setbacks in the Land Use Data table on the Cover Sheet and on Sheet 3/13. Provide complete justification why measurement from the CCCL cannot be complied with and the complete justification as to how this proposed reductions will not "adversely affect the safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood" (General Applicability criteria #3) and "redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviation" (Comp Infill criteria #1) and how "flexibility in regard to...required setbacks... are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity" (Comp Infill criteria #8). 14. Provide proposed setbacks to the tower outline on Sheet 3/13 and in the Land Use Data table on the Cover Sheet. 15 . Provide/show on all appropriate sheets, including landscaping, the required egress sidewalk from the doors on the west side to the public way, as required by the Building Code. 16. Site plan and Landscape plan sheets place the front of the building and South Gulfview Blvd. on the right side of the sheet. Revise the architectural plans to have the same orientation. 17. Provide parking stall counts per floor on the Cover Sheet. Note in the Land Use Data table that two of the parking spaces proposed are dedicated to taxis. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 40 18 . Provide the width 11 oJ'the sidewalk along the south side of the property. Unclear why this sidewalk must be placed in the center of this 15-foot wide area such that it breaks up the landscape area to provide meaningful and cohesive landscaping. Revise or provide justification. Also unclear why, as shown on Sheet L-1, that this walkway needs to be constructed of pavers, since this is the access to roll dumpsters out to the trash staging area. Pavers create more noise when rolling the dumpsters. This also includes the trash staging area and the driveway to it (shown on Sheet L-1). Revise. 19. Unclear why a gate is proposed on the north side of the Level 1 parking. Provide justification or remove. 20. Unclear why there is a paved area on the north side west of the driveway from the City parking lot, that is indicated on Sheet L-1 for "retail" when there is no retail floor area in this location. Provide complete details as the operational aspects of this area or remove. 21 . Provide the square footage of the retail space on Level 1 on Sheet 3/13. 22. Columns shown on Sheet 3/13 north of taxi parking spaces impede drive aisle and produce a drive aisle less than Code required width of 24 feet. Revise. 23 . Sheet 3/13 indicates three kiosks. Provide complete details as to purpose and design. 24. Sheet L-1 indicates a "covered retail area" (east) and "specialty paved retail plaza" (two locations, north and east). Provide complete details as to proposal with all operational characteristics, including square footage of each area. If so desired, must request "outdoor retail sales, display and/or storage" as a use (see Commercial District, Table 2-703 and criteria under 2-703.L), also providing all required parking. 25 . Landscaping shown on Sheet L-2 on the northeast corner of the property does not take into account the utility and fire department requirements, as shown on Sheet 10/13. Coordinate proposed landscaping with these needs/requirements. 26. Sheet 3/13 - The legend indicates a dashed line as the "tower outline (floor 4 and up), however, there is a dashed line approximately 20 feet back from and parallel with S. Gulfview Blvd. that appears to conflict with the line as intended to show. Advise/revise. 27. Sheets 3/13 and L-2 - Are there outdoor lights proposed along the seawall? There are what appears to be light symbols indicated (ghosted in). If provided, unclear as to need. Advise/remove or show as proposed lighting (no ghosting). 28. Revise Sheet A1.01 in Building Area Tabulations for condo parking, as the required amount (as indicated on the Cover Sheet for civil plans) is 170 spaces (not 113). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 41 29. Proposal is for 113 dwelling units, which is one too many dwelling U . Revise Cover Sheet for civil plans and Sheet A1.01. See calculation below: Mixed Use Calculation for Adams Mark Property - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR = 1.0 and maximum density = 30 du/acre) I . Permitted FAR LG(l G( 000LGLLLL[ (((GGG 1 0 2. Building square footage of non-residential portion i,?ZUZi,x 2,910 sf 3. Lot area required to support non-residential use in the building "= 2,910 sf 4. Lot area of upland GGGGGLGGGLGGGGLLLGI l 81,450 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non-residential use in the building (#A3) 2,910 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units L.= 78,540 sf 7. Divide #A6 LGGGLLGGLLLGLGGGLLLGLLG 78,540 sf 8. Land area in an acre GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG- 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage GL( GGGLbGLLGLGGGLGLGGI - 1.803 acres 10. Multiply lot acreage GGGLGGGGLGGGGGGGGGG 1.803 acres 11. Maximum density GGGGI l l Ll L( Ll GLLLI LGX 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted 54 du B. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) 1. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted 54 du 2. Multiply by maximum transfer of 20% of #131 ZZZUZZ. Lx 0.2 3. Maximum number of du to be transferred into this property ?Z.L= 10 du C. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA)LLLL 217 rooms (Terminated through FLD2005-01005) 2. Subtract new OVA rooms/unitsLLLLZ?LL?L?LZL..- 78 rooms 3. Remaining OVA rooms1units?LZ4LLLLLLLLLLL.. 139 4. Conversion of OVA to dwelling units (40/30 rule) LLZL?ZL 104 du 5. Add in TDR (#B3)?L?LLLLi.LLL4LLLLLLL.. 10 du 6. Total number of dwelling units allowable 114 du 7. Divide #A3 GGGGGGGGLGLGLGGI LGLLLL 2,910 sf 8. By land area to support 1 dwelling unit (43,560 sf _ 30 du/acre) L.- 1,452 sf 9. Number of dwelling units = to #A2 Ll LLLLGI Ll l Gl G 2 du 10. Subtract #C9 from #C6 for Maximum Number of Dwelling Units in conjunction with Commercial floor area (#A2)..LLLL" x.112 du 30. Parking calculations on the Cover Sheet for civil plans indicate that a total of 263 spaces are required for the proposed retail, condo dwellings and hotel rooms. However, on Sheet A2.01 indicates 23 public parking spaces. With only 277 total spaces being provided (which includes two spaces dedicated to taxis), unclear how 23 spaces are above and beyond the required parking for this site. Provide explanation. 31 . Sheet A2.01 indicates a "sundeck" on the west side of the building, however, it appears to be inside the walls of the building. Provide explanation. If outside, revise all appropriate civil, landscape and architectural plans for the ground level to indicate such open area and to indicate how this area is accessed. 32. Provide the square footages of all of the attached dwelling (condominium) units (including the villas) and all of the hotel rooms. 33 . Level 4 - Single hotel unit within, and accessed solely through, the club amenity area seems out of place. Explain. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 42 34. Unit count on the civil plans Cover Sheet (11 units) and as indicatedlevations on Sheet A3.01, there are hotel units on Level 11. However, there are no hotel units indicated on Level 11 on Sheet A2.06. Explain. 35 . Sheet A2.07 - There is a trellis proposed on the roof south of Unit G on Level 12. What is the purpose of the trellis, as there does not appear to be any access by Unit G to use this trellis or roof area? Also, this roof area south of Unit G is indicated as "roof below" where it is actually the roof of Unit H on Level 11, at the same level as Level 12. Revise. 36. Sheet A2.08 - Unclear as to the purpose of the "loggia" east of Unit C for both Levels 14 & 15. Explain. 37 . Dimensions and depictions to the sides of the elevations on Sheets A.301, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 do not line up with the elevations themselves, as the floor levels go through windows. Correct/revise for all sheets. Ensure correctness to scale of drawings. 38. Elevations on Sheets A3.01 and A3.02 indicate something different on the south sides of Levels 12 and 13 than what the floor plans indicate (trellis or enclosed area ??). Revise/make consistent. 39. The parapets dimensioned on Sheets A3.01 through A3.04 are not accurate at 2'-6" (much higher). Provide correct dimensions. 40. Sheet A3.03 - Elevation is inaccurate as to height of area east of Unit C on Level 15 (building area of elevator/stairs need to go one floor higher). Revise. 41. Sheet A3.04 indicates windows, balconies and other features on Levels 11 through 15 that are not indicated on the floor plans. Revise and/or explain. 42. Revise Exhibit B of the application to correct the number of proposed condominium dwelling units (112 dwellings). Include the outdoor retail sales, display and storage use with its proposed square footage. 43. Revise Exhibit B - Termination of nonconforming status is not necessary, as this was approved under FLD2005-01005. Remove as part of the request. Note: The proposal includes the conversion of these overnight accommodation units to dwelling units. 44. Amend the request to include a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as S. Gulfview is an arterial street per the Comprehensive Plan (criteria for attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and retail sales). Provide justification for the deviation. 45. It appears the building is located within the visibility triangles on the north side of the southern driveway on S. Gulfview Blvd. and the driveway on the north. Please confirm. If so located, include as part of the application and provide complete justification for such encroachment from a vehicular and pedestrian safety standpoint. 46. Exhibit B, Section B, includes a request to the rear setback for structures other than buildings from 20 feet to 16 feet. Unclear what this is requesting, as there isn't any setback indicated on the civil plans at 16 feet, nor something "other than a building" shown. Explain. 47. General Applicability criteria #1 - Provide a detailed analysis of how this project is "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located." 48. General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide a detailed analysis of how this project will not "significantly impair the value" of adjacent land and buildings. 49. General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a detailed response to show how this project "will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood," including the location and number of driveways. 50. General Applicability criteria #4 - Provide the information provided to the Traffic Operations Division to the Planning Department, so that it is part of the application file. However, this pertains to a Traffic Impact Analysis. Provide a response of how this project "minimizes traffic congestion" by defining "adequate" drive aisles and stacking space at the driveways. 51 . General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project is "consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel." Provide specific information regarding surrounding building uses, height, mass, etc. 52 . General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project "minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties." It is noted that the "peaceful, bright courtyard, water features and verandas" are mostly on the fourth level, where the general public will not even see these features. Provide the operational characteristices (hours of operation, etc.) that are proposed for the retail portions of this development, especially the "outdoor retail sales, display and storage" use. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 43 53 . Comprehensive Inf edevelopment Project criteria #1 - Describe in etail how this redevelopment project is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards," including all of the reductions to setbacks (including the CCCL) and increases to height (see "request" prepared by staff). The cupolas are purely decorative and are not proposed to "hide various mechanical equipment," which is why the project is meeting the Code provisions for a maximum of 16 feet above the roof deck for the elevator and mechanical equipment for the "overruns." 54. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project is "compatible with adjacent land uses." 55 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project will "upgrade the immediate vicinity" of this property. The City has a project called Beach Walk. What portion(s) of Beach Walk is the applicant constructing that otherwise wouldn't have been constructed by the City? Unclear how the fountain (only one on the ground level), the plaza (I assume you mean the plaza up on the fourth level, which the general public will not enjoy or see) and the retail uses "improve the pedestrian access and enjoyment of this area of the beach." Provide details. 56. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project "creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Provide details as to the surrounding area. 57. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - Provide detailed responses as to how flexibility for this project "are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole," specifically as to the following: 1. Termination of Nonconforming Status - This was addressed under FLD2005-01005. Remove from application. 2. Height - Provide a detailed response, in accordance with Section 4-1403.C.4, as to how this project's increased height provides a "reasonable relationship between the number of units transferred and any increases in building height." Provide the number of units above 100 feet. Also address the other portion of this Section that states "Compatibility with the surrounding area and feasibility of the project shall be considered when approving any increase in height." 3. Setbacks - Unclear as to relief is being sought in relation to the "incorporation of the Beach Walk improvements into the site, along the easterly and northerly boundaries." Provide details as to how the City's Beach Walk project is impacting the redevelopment of this site in a manner that setback reductions must be requested. Application does not provide a clear reason why compliance with the setback requirements measured from the CCCL is a problem. 58. Provide a detailed response to the TDR criteria of Section 4-1403.A: 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses; 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 59. Provide a detailed response to Section 4-1403.C.3 - "Appropriate view corridors are incorporated in the design of the parcel proposed for development and all design standards in Article 3 Division 5 are otherwise satisfied." 60. Due to the nature of the proposed design, it is recommended to provide a perspective drawing to assist in understanding the views and massing of this project (at least looking southwest). 61 . Mass/Bulk Review - It is stated in #4 that at least 68% of the facades are covered with architectural accents, windows or decorative railings. Provide the percentage calculated for each facade. 62. Mass/Bulk Review #8 - There is only one fountain on the ground level, not fountains. Revise. 63 . Tower Separation #Ie - Provide the square footages of the floorplates over 45 feet in height that you are requesting a deviation from. 64. Concerned with the proposed "outdoor retail sales, display and storage" use in relation to the Beach by Design Design Guideline for "Street-Level Facades" #4 on Page 62 which states "Goods for sale will not be displayed outside of a building, except as a permitted temporary use. This does not apply to outdoor food service establishments." Advise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 44 65 . Provide a response to•Beach by Design Design Guidelines for "fountains" on Page 65. 66. Provide color rendered drawings (at least the front elevation) to show the intended color scheme of the buildings. Also provide 8.5"x11" reductions to Planning for presentation at the CDB. 67. Are there any storage units on the ground level (below FEMA line) for unit owners? If so, show location and design. 68. Proposal intends the overnight accommodation rooms/units to be "condo-hotel." As such, provide the operational characteristics of the hotel. If approved, the following condition will be recommended: "That the use of the southern building on this property be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 days, where occupancy of rooms/units arise from a rental agreement, other agreement or the payment of consideration. At the request of the City Manager or designee, the records of the business shall be made available for examination to determine whether the length of stay complies with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines, revocation of the occupational license and/or any other enforcement afforded by law or by City regulations. A license must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, shall be maintained. This portion of the development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall rooms/units qualify for homestead exemption or home or business occupational licenses." 69. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program." 70. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits." 71 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks." 72. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits." 73 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid." 74. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits." 75 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work." 76. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB." 77. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy." 78 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy." Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 45 79. Potential conditionbe included in the Staff Report: "That a speciAlwarranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 557/579 Cyprus Avene, 625/627 Bay Esplanade, 665 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 557/579 Cyprus Avene, 625/627 Bay Esplanade, 665 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site 557/579 Cyprus Avene, 625/627 Bay Esplanade, 665 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits." Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 8/16/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 7/7/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 46 • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 3:10 PM To: Planning Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: FYI -----Original Message----- From: Blackburn, Anne Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 2:56 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Hi Sherry Fire's conditions on: FLD2005-05045, and FLD2005-05047, and FLD2005-05048, have been met. Thanks for all your help, Anne -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 3:39 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way 2. FLD2005-05047 - 430 Gulfview Blvd 3. FLD2005-05048 - 331 Cleveland Street I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. Thank you and have a great day Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:45 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Case- FLD2005-05051- 445 Hamden Drive has arrived it is also in the same location Thank you Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, COB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have ueen resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, IR meeting: 1. FLD2005-05037 - 1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 - 1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 - 1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schodlter 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 - 1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark & Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Sherry Watkins • • Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 1:08 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Bruch, Tracey; Elbo, Bennett; Quillen, Michael Subject: FLD2005-05047 - 430 S. Gulfview Wayne, Engineering has completed review of the resubmittal for the subject project and updated Permit Plan. Conditions of approval: The prior to building permit, all proposed modifications to the City parking lot be approved by the City Engineer. Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Ph'i Graham & Company, RAO • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:59 PM To: 'Rick Rollins' Cc: Bruch, Tracey; Quillen, Michael; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Adams mark I have reviewed the revised layout of the south end of the City parking lot with Tracey Bruch, Parking Systems Manager. Concerns include: . The lack of dimensions on the plan, including lane widths. . The length to the east of the median separating the parking lot entrance and exit aisles. . The configuration of the island separating the two exit aisles. . The purpose of reconfiguring this area differently than as proposed in the City's Beach Walk project. These issues need to be resolved, but they need not hold up further processing of the application at this time. A condition of approval for the project can state that any work done in the lot shall be approved by the City Engineer. The best method of addressing these concerns would be a meeting including your representative and appropriate City staff. Please contact me to arrange this meeting. Thanks, D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Rick Rollins [mailto:rrollins@pgcla.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 9:13 AM To: Bruch, Tracey Cc: Rice, Scott; jeff.handlin@us.taylorwoodrow.com; jayneS@jpfirm.com; hbooth@pgcla.com Subject: Adams mark Phil Graham C oriipari `, PA. I..andscape ArchiffftUre Urban Design Planning See attachment of resubmittal design for Adam's Mark. The civil plans from FDC cu do not reflect the design on our landscape plans. FDC will be resubmitting for consi 11/27/2005 PhN1 Graham & Company, P.A • Page 2 of 2 As per review comments we have added an additional pay station and removed Ada Mark garage access from the public parking lot. There will still be a ticket dispenser parking entry and payment verification. Please review and comment as necessary. Richard Rollins Landscape Architect Phil Graham & Company, P.A. 436 Second Street North St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727.821.5225 Voice 727.826.1626 Facsimile www.i)gcla.com 11/27/2005 wi vi ? 267A 2678 ? A t aovl tot 3 CITY OF CLEARWATER s iS AND VICINITY PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA p v° v o 32/02 32/D3 PREPARED BY i PUBLIC 170RK5 ADMINISTRATION 3 $ f+857 sr roe P ao 2 `a=.? ENCINEERINC d STREET & r1 3 WATER L07 A pn, (613)582 175D, foa:w (813)526-44 T slip://www.dearwalar-fleom/engines/ 5 a 701 53 Y Dlsclotmer, 1 6 98 ] O P° 5 53 99 "I 6 c I 1 v **.to PuDlle Inlormotlon data Is tumlmed by in. City Of Cloorwotef 7 7 Public W4fke Adminfctrotbn/Engt-l", and must be accepted 1D0 Ir lA and used by in' -1011-t with the underatondNg that the data par -fit 56 $ e-T N ,P 6 y rxtAwe wow collected rp the purpose DI developMg o geophl, 61-24e a 2 'tt Pti 10 InffowtNClale Inventory. N such, the City or Clearwater PWA/E a lrr 5 r/a makla no valanlNf, rAplewead or ImDlled, ConCeminy Ise C \ y 02 tq 4 0 11 12 lic-acy, Compietmes% rellabllRy w "It- 41ty o/ thfs data far ??Jl X+3 ry Q? + 13 f4 R p any otne Dartlculo! uee, Furihermore, In. Clly of Clearwats °a 1'701-IO7 f0 101 1 tp SJ 52 ?r-'Ely n ?'e A 15 16 17 1g 19 I20 f 2 2S 24 25 27 128 PWAA oswmes no liability eholsoewr associated wllh the use m mliufe of W& data. 5 its 4 .?° • y e 1, as too ° t ?ree 51 L? 1 $ 8 = a 29 MUL, o tJ0 2tm SD ?` ° R Thl. tl1 ?t lw -b 11.1 to periodk mange.. : 12 PO 0 >0 49 49 A x 3o For Infcwwm allen about mt.It rwIslw,e. please Con PWA/E w ? . g x $ C E ?° awn aa, en wil A aol STREET g 17 4 (? , d THE 105 moo I I Soo eel 45 44 43 42 40 79 38 I17 35 3d 33, 32 31 F 13 ! agg_ N 105 aof tae 2 I OD 74 aoa gD IA N, &N srr gt 08 mr r 3 I a IA to ma t 9 ria a/s ? e f7 °Jp 62 1 0 am ?" 5 -2 0 100 - 200 400 600 19 6r 63 of ere 2A at' ? 6n its 6N 3 SCALE: 1" = 600 19 ear .ue 65 r? ar] 7} oar 3A 20 .. Be t14 sit 8? 4 aao 4A 8P8AI,E JIM LEGEND: 15 410 y "1 P 2, a 67 116 591D 6?6 4»7 56 54 53 E O BLOCK NUMBER Z2 BB 11 an R $ 8 d < 5, 511 50 49 48 47 18 45 44 +3 1422 I1 40 23 o sr] slat, R 4 0'S $P1 $ ? e • 39 SB ?. IV 69 118 a, 7 a $ 2 $ ?a YL $ LYE Q • 77 36 ?I 24 ace M g2 as a OR1QITpgATEq x ?C RE b eyj g 35 1234 LOT ADDRESS 2 ae/ 70 119 a 1 ° F•+? :8 1! ORIVE 8r X31 Co S , _ -- ae I eat3y O 9 are 2 3 4 D $ S 3 „ $ E 2 $ g$ C r! `• s<,JAp y32 31 -?--? CITY LIMITS LINE asa sis 5 6 7 g i1 12 NTAA E ? 10, T6 Fl I f aG 9A 9 10 '] 13 14 15 18 0 THE BAY ° 70 '?+ ? S RN to 2 2D 21 $$ a e R ? ?p r--1 SHADED AREA -PROPERTY Si r 26% pa 1pr 72 121 ``' aesp i0A '22 23 24 Z r° 4 ?e 9 L' --J OUTSIDE CLEARWA TER CITY LIMITS n 73 27 122 1BY A T A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX j .e. 13m-,o7 aae d.. idol 26 27 28 { 28 ,/r 74 T VT CITY OWNED PROPERTY 1 29 124 ?7 75 ?10 ? 1 ?' 1 2 30 t!p 76 125 e + 1f 9 q $ 3 4 5 6 EA '?f U9 N A ] MDR ZONING DESIGNATION f IR 77 128 66 5 $ I R h° B ; I 7 a ,a ,1 ,T u u i6 t7 .t e.: Fj'g NO 4 St 127 6i? a 2 $ $ 3 R • • • 21 22 (/ ZONE LINE 4.176 8AY51OE @ A ! 32 79 126uo 4fa 8 /ri h t P ,A q • B i !JJ i Z $ $ '2 T 47 7 2 d E 4 6 9 to f t123 o ,5 3 P 6 12 it 5 t0 s Q B On Aq 4T e M 34 82 0 131 A. 4 Y 1f 4y S b?b°hs 1 fi NV n 35 44b 83 132 f k 84 113 7 kC B 34 E I ttP 87 eta F ti 1 9 440 WEST a +0 c CONDO tP P 1 22-27 e 1 `L4 U19 + 6 REVISED: ep 6 7 6 co?A 6 03/08/99 '' -- art.. a e 9 -- -- -- -- -- ZONING ATLAS ? 285A SW 1/4 OF SECTION - 8 - 29 S - 15 E 285 276A • • m SW ? PPPAYA ST 8 PblOD O C. ahc WRAWAFO S 'R FD78T 87 71187p ql' DR ar 3 ?ao¢ W PROJECT, WATER CR SITE FTnH ar BAYSICE C &ArnAY s BLVD c° e r e (XD ? Aa ss 4- O 4- CD Location Map Owner. TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC Case: FLD2005-05047 TDR2005-05022 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size (Acres) : 2.45 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A • • Aerial Map Owner: TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC ( Case: FLD2005-05047 TDR2005-05022 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 2.45 Size(Acres): PIN: 1 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: I 276A • • 26 2612 O Fj/e? ;4V1 ---- 121 +I 121 ? y % ?? ! j/ ?;,/ 27 122 /12 4 28 411 V `406 2 ` L? 74 1_ 75 124 1 / ?- 1 11 ?t 1 409`1 I 1 r' r I 1, 1 /- i 29 410 r^-?__ 1 _00 , 1 _ 1 1 1 415 / 1 r pl 1 - -- 1 30 412 ---- 77 128 421 l r 111 (S? r 8'? r_41yq 31 1 1 - i r/24 431 7 ?- _ 420 2 I r / 32 r 1 1 -440 03019 t?8 \ r 3 -'% k-A 1 80 --/ 4 \ \"" \ " 43 /i J?--r T / \ 1 ; 5 \ 34 P 430 ? 35 "i "" eP5 I i i ? i l r 133 / ;7 1 1 / / 36 A40 1 134 / i 85 p6g i 445 + ? 1 1 '' O L, 1 1 J 88 110 / ? v 514 pro ?ry ? ? 1 1 +J Zoning Map Owner. TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC Case: FLD2005-05047 TDR2005-05022 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 2 45 Size(Acres) : . PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A • • 26 O F/ 26 112 faa?°- -21 p 12, - it IN 27 a o mm dirt80 j' _? ?J X12 28 411 V - I 74 - I I 121 I 409f 1. 1 `---`, 1 75 7 , t-41 29 0 Beach I QC9? I S 410 COI - q i ?2e 91 -- ? i 412 `---- j 30 421 128 8-? 4 ... 31 420 2 1431 70-' J f ! e 1-3 434 1 1 80 4 ` `` 1 1 f 5 34 1 \ j 1 1 I 430 \ Ahb 1 I 1 \ 35 - OVOW ' f ! 133 7 1 , 38 AAO acc (Ws 1 , , 85 . -j s A66 ?? 445 S\V -- 9 ? r i 1 ---?;_? _-? ve ' L? 88 rJ Ccom mO tm0 - L -j A bVed dwellings e ti t 14 I ? % r ?e ?` o L +J Overni bt, accompiodadQns Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC Case: FLD2005-05047 TDR2005-05022 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 2 45 Size(Acres): . PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A • 10 Jo ¦• zilzi ZI in" ZI ?x i t f W t14 rte, ? ? View looking southwest at subject property View looking north at public parking and beach north of subject property (S. Gulfview Blvd. on right) 430 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 • View looking west at sidewalk on public beach north of subject property View of overnight accommodation use to the northeast of subject property across S. Gulfview Blvd. 1 of 2 0 0 I View looking southwest at 440 West condominiums to the southeast of subject property (showing proximity to hotel) View looking southeast at commercial uses across S. Gulfview Blvd. e r R? ¦¦ ?? 4 ?I y L- 'A View looking south at 440 West condominiums to the southeast of subject property (showing both towers) 430 South Gulfview Boulevard 2 of 2 FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 200 5 9:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-01005 ;. zoning.doc location.doc existing.doc aerial.doc FLD Map request form.doc Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:40 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Subject: Fix Maps? Sam - Attached are maps for FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 for the site at 415 South Gulfview Boulevard. The north arrow needs to be fixed. You did not produce this set of maps, but they are a copy of a prior case for the same site (you will find your maps under FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016). Thanks. Wayne << File: Aerial Map.doc >> << File: Existing Surrounding Uses Map.doc >> << File: Location Map.doc >> << File: Zoning Map.doc >> 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:40 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Subject: Fix Maps? Sam - Attached are maps for FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-05022 for the site at 415 South Gulfview Boulevard. The north arrow needs to be fixed. You did not produce this set of maps, but they are a copy of a prior case for the same site (you will find your maps under FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016). Thanks. Wayne rmFn? MI , 71 Aerial Map.doc Existing Location Map.doc Zoning Map.doc rrounding Uses Map F(a>ar.??-vso?? <f3?? vj 6-1 u 61ctl ? AL /-0 /A 2678 11 CITY OF CLEARWATER ' A , 001 to, 3 9 - - , Sr " S CO TY F 3I PINEU.A UNN LORIDA /oz 2 !e wa is 2 3 $ i PREPARED BY MINISTRATION ` PUBLIC WORKS AD TR3T STREET to 3 WATER LOT A I ENCINEEP 100 S M1rae Awe., Clenwaler, Fl. 33756 ? 4 ,? N ? n .0 t 4 ?IID //sl .."Iaarxoia o(LClun'%angb?ie4er%5 tpr 52 99 7 S W° C I , 1 0 Y 6 Disclaimer; N F D 6 tIt 53 99 7 7 7 P.Wfe Inf«mollon data la fum"hw by the city or Clearwale, Public Worse AdmhletrationArtilneWing, and must be accepted {7 \ w 54 100 a N A g V °& )6t-pe! ?y $ tfv 0 2 'IO 9 8 e and used by the reel°lent with the understanding that the data received was collected far the purpax of cf-elopln9 ° graphic Inf-t.uel i l A ? Le r C e 10 5 ure neen q. . such. the City of Cleorw°ler PWA/E maxea no warranilea expressed or im lied con er i t tro O2 ttr ba 77 9 1 Aj3 , tit 13 u R P 1? O.fl 130, 76 16 17 1 1 ttw ' ? 52 , c n , ng he p accuracy, completeness. reliability, or aulloblllly of ihla data for any other particular ase. farlnermare. the City of Clearwater PWA aswmea no Ibbly whatsoever as it i t d . _.07 10 8 19 IIO 1 I 23 21 25 330 27 128 ` . ? 53 4 e e 1 us y soc a e w h Inc use « m x of such data. 5 e a e1 tt 104 , ?tte 5t ?6 k E 8 S P 29 tJa Cq 2 t'f4 50 1 This Atlas pout la wbtl j?e¢tla p<rlodle enongea $ 49 12 0 70 a ` 0 4) 8 / S ! L E t30 .m ti- . F« a,f«mallon about laical reeb ;; al-se call PWA/E or ,lilt o r W b - 0 wr STREET Is 17 { 45 {d @ ta T 100 I . u e . HE 105 d r {3 42 60 39 38 aaI 37 35 34 J3I 32 J1 1 too N 13 B6-,3 706 Aug, 304 - 11 A sot 2lA 6o N tat 3 1 a 1A I x t 61 08 16 me 7 9 -to Jya 4N J/a trt 62 , 0 tm 12 T 17 TA F+ 0 1,00 2,00 400 600 83 i 18 17 ses 8 N " ' 3 1 64 t ? SCALE: t = 400 t9 sat Jta 65 11 tit 7x t4s 3A d p 20 ? 174 AW gm tro aA ?At orvpree LEGEND: es 15 JJe ID ]tat 21 ? 910 g(/J5 7 56 I ? tt 61" 54 2 11 6 $$ 8? 53 g2 p E 48 a7 46 45 2 86 Jp R ? Z C w S1 SO 49 da63 42 41 a0 P 3B I O BLOCK NUMBER 23 ° set tgtl .R 14 L7? 6Ye S 38 V. gg 718 7 7 3 A= $ ?? 3 e 2 Fc C N _ a E e8 8 35 aD a BRATIITNA1Eq 24 tai 70 119 ?s to g 8 e 1 ?eC ?$ ?4> 0 0161E dge `v 34 33 tea 2 3 8 C ?.? A N C? . 2 2 Q } ?a?` 25 32 D +d I ett3V \ '4 1234 LOT ADDRESS ----? CITY LIMITS LINE 6 5 31 3 ? 8? = 0 9 ? y rt tool 7t 720 I JJJ t t 12 + HTXA E B ?` .r a 8 7 8 ? i d 1 ? 13 14 15 18 OX 26 9 10 LI T? AY o 30 $ 04 tl1 10 9A 7 2 20 st $C A d?4j te nom,;.-...:T1 SHADED AREA -PROPERTY 1 o t0A 22 23 Qo29 e r 26X Q rcr 72 121 STREET t 1 i°"r3 OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS $ 27 a $ 20 25 / ro) 73 722 tool 1Ie? 1A 26 X27 48 b. 13m_ AGREEMENT TO ANNEX TS e0 7d 2 ? 11 T $ t {? m 12{ 29 3 ,? CITY OWNED PROPERTY J 75 ? `wt0 ro 1 % 7 2 $ 3 4 5 6 3p 410 76 725 s 4 4 UB N /? 1 MDR ZONING DESIGNATION 9 I E' ut 1T6 A • 7 8 tp 11 12 13 14 16 17 .iii.: 19 NU 4 77 5 84A as $ 3 e 20 21 a s I2 V 2 127 St °e gA T BAY9DE 4!178 a Q ZONE LINE 'I 79 1284ta 41a 32 3 it 30 7 $ r 1; e 4!J 33 gp 129 {1d7 4 Z J 4 5 g 7 6 92 10 11 12 1J 14 1S ?t l3 12 tt r `? ?Syq` E 130 e { e9 81 1p A Q e fb o 5 t H 34 B2 131 Al 9 a YIPrk, V ?e0 b s 4b 83 132 35 A 84 7 3 7 41 "a 6 1 73 8 8 3 a Ad' 67 ets F ee 9 0 440 HEST 0 10 D CONDO op x 11 8 r ` 19 22-27 g 1 I . °?g ? d ? ? ? 3e N ° 3 4 6 9AY1?AY tie X 8 eP 6 7 e DA 68MM REVISED: 03108199 t 9 ZONING ATLAS ? 285A SW 1/4 OF SECTION 28SR A 8 - 711 s-15 c ?7F)A • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 11:45 AM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Subject: RE: FLD2005-05047 - 430 S. Gulfview Tracey Bruch (562-4771) -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 11:41 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005-05047 - 430 S. Gulfview Wayne, who is the City Parking Manager? -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 11:23 AM To: Jayne E. Sears Subject: FW: FLD2005-05047 - 430 S. Gulfview Jayne - Need to resolve ASAP. Wayne > -----Original Message----- > From: Rice, Scott > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 11:13 AM > To: Wells, Wayne > Cc: Bruch, Tracey; Elbo, Bennett; Faessler, Heather > Subject: FLD2005-05047 - 430 S. Gulfview > Wayne, > Issues not resolved in resubmittal: > Environmental 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 7/12/05 - JUSTIFICATION NOT SUBMITTED > Traffic > 1. The proposed northern driveway and resulting modifications to the City parking lot exit would negatively impact the operation of the City lot and shall not be permitted. The proposed modifications involve the loss of one of the existing pay stations. A motorist wishing to enter the development parking lot would be required to enter the City lot, take a pay ticket and circle the lot to gain access to the development lot. The City lot is closed at certain times (lot full - nights) thereby eliminating access to the development lot. 7/12/05 - THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY HAS BEEN ELIMINATED. THE PROPOSED RECONFIGURATION OF THE SOUTH END OF THE CITY PARKING LOT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AS ONE OF THE PAY STATION WOULD BE ELIMINATED. THIS AREA MUST BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PARKING MANAGER. 1 • • > D. Scott Rice > Land Devel. Engr. Manager > 727-562-4781 > scott.rice@MyClearwater.com I ? 196 - 0 9 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 10:50 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: fyi -----Original Message----- From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 10:35 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Sherry, P&P has reviewed and we are okay! Thanks! Debbie O -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 3:39 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way 2. FLD2005-05047 - 430 Gulfview Blvd 3. FLD2005-05048 - 331 Cleveland Street I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. Thank you and have a great day Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:45 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Case- FLD2005-05051- 445 Hamden Drive has arrived it is also in the same location Thank you Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: • • 1. FLD2005-05037 - 1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 - 1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 - 1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schodlter 7. FLD2005-05038 - 1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 - 1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark & Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Sherry Watkins 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 11:13 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Bruch, Tracey; Elbo, Bennett; Faessler, Heather Subject: FLD2005-05047 - 430 S. Gulfview Wayne, Issues not resolved in resubmittal: Environmental 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 7/12/05 - JUSTIFICATION NOT SUBMITTED Traffic 1. The proposed northern driveway and resulting modifications to the City parking lot exit would negatively impact the operation of the City lot and shall not be permitted. The proposed modifications involve the loss of one of the existing pay stations. A motorist wishing to enter the development parking lot would be required to enter the City lot, take a pay ticket and circle the lot to gain access to the development lot. The City lot is closed at certain times (lot full - nights) thereby eliminating access to the development lot. 7/12/05 - THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY HAS BEEN ELIMINATED. THE PROPOSED RECONFIGURATION OF THE SOUTH END OF THE CITY PARKING LOT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AS ONE OF THE PAY STATION WOULD BE ELIMINATED. THIS AREA MUST BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PARKING MANAGER. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4787 scott.rice@MyC/earwater.com Wells, Wayne mw? From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 3:39 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way 2. FLD2005-05047 - 430 Gulfview Blvd 3. FLD2005-05048 - 331 Cleveland Street I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. Thank you and have a great day Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:45 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Case- FLD2005-05051- 445 Hamden Drive has arrived it is also in the same location Thank you Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05037 - 1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 - 1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schoditer 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 -1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark & Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, • Sherry Watkins • %?Dac:o?-aso-g7 <13ca5 C-rul-?v?ecu?lu?l ?w ? A "Lb /A 2678 ? 7 8 , • 7 ow [01 } CITY OF CLEARWaEfi v i AND VICINITY ? - - t r - - h i PINEILA S COUNTY FLO I a 32/07 . , R DA GT ??1 si 2 32/02 so rob >: t °a2 8 PREPARED PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 7 FIRST STREET J WATER LOT A Pe ` E CN ER NG 100 S. Nlrtle Are., Ckvsaler, [L 33756 ` to e Ph.: (613)562-475D. Foe (813)526-4755 Mip://wwx.elfOrxolar-f[cam/englnev/ qbn a ? De 4 5 p for 52 98 1 5 > o Disclaimer: 6 99 m Irt to 6 [ 1 , r o r N [ o 53 7 7 ti Waft Public Olbn data Is Nrmsned by lne city of Clearwater Public Works Adm MlelrOlbn serlnu. 0n0 mull be o e r ^ \ 1pp ? ? e ? 9 ors rd 2N •ea $4 v bk [6w and used 69 the with the unddHq that the data reeahed wOf calle<led (w the t the purpose of O[ de develaphu O gophlc I f b oes ? 6 UI -'I' C• 10 a p n - uclure Nvmtay. As such, the City or Lim-Cler PWA/E makes n0 Vpraa W9 eap,med or im lied [OO l t ° 11 12 13 9 ZIP 5 02 ttr 4 tia $ s x'1 p u R P a 1$ ` 5 1 , , Wm hq he p Dc[I =Y. [Omdeime,e. rellob6Ny. Dr suitability of this data (w any other parpculor - Furthermore, the City of Clearwater PWA/E assumes n 6 bilil h .9. 1301-e0, 10 v° ? A 5} 32 16 17 1g 19 I20 2 23 21 2$ 27 /26 ° e 0 tts • a a y w otsoever 0-elated with the use or misuse of such. data. 29 ,? @ t 1 t1 51 ° 11 to 5 104 100 ?tra 'n S t 7 Thi At D t ' R ° _ t1o 2 z 12 $ D y ,e 49 48 ?7 4 Y C E 10 Jar STREE7:'i 45 44 I to I s tl las .h Pout la sue to Perladb Mon For Informallon stout rev lalafl isions PI-se call PWA/E or vial! our wen site. j 171E 105 tar 43 42 d 40 79 38 ° aDy 1 ma 37 35 3d J3I 32 3t N t3 p 1b-)0 106 sae ma 2 ap 1 ?i - 14 toe W gg aoa 60 aaa 3 3 N ar I 1e, t mr 61 Og JI / 1 9 it, OAS All rp 16 T ayo t O am 414 5 -2 2A r 0 1D0 200 400 600 a 63 3 77 3M ari 1 1 8 64 aaa 6M 3 SCALE: t" = 600' 19 ear ate 65 11 ro 7x atr 3A 4 p 20 114 ," gm aaa `A ee? 01 PIPER LEGEND: 68 15 say h 5 rat 21 .7'' ar 67 910 g V25 57 56 11 54 22 6g $ $; 53 52 (? E 4g 47 4g 45 43 42 41 39 8 P O BLOCK NUMBER JB U. 23 ° ae> 1tg aej11 r 7 36 - 69 a. ro eR R! RE a R?ITW g ? Y j 35 J 1234 LOT ADDRESS y AIER 2t >? q f 1 rg? ?8 70 1,9aea DidYE 3 8qq 31 . d ea ?\ Uj 1 6 0 C 73 25 I e>1y.7 sea 2 } ? ? Q3? ? ? >: ? ' q ? t 32 a aaa 77 120 1 9 4 5 ??>3 :>? _ `•°q S S1 as 6 7 11 12 RTIIA E q V ale B 13 14 15 18 OM 1 3 " lo. ?--?- CITY LIMITS LINE 4 0 26 9 IO THS AY 40 ?g / 2 S ?1Ai1 9A 10 2t 9 A 0° 22 ° a fs:*';;*I SHADED AREA -PROPERTY 4 v st4 Z6'h ror S?" 23 g QO 10A a29 ? 4 72 i21 24 .S? s r OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS '"ia . - a 25 $ F 6 1 28 27 73 122 26 12 IA epa ? AGREEMENT TO ANNEX s. 130_,01 2 eoa 27 26 .a err 74 o tt m p e 3 ' CITY OWNED PROPERTY oa 29 V 75 124 910 v 1 1 2 30 t1a 76 125 a 4 V 07 J ` 5 6 UB N A 9 rr MDR ZONING DESIGNATION '1q NO 4 A E 2 ` 7 8 10 11 12 t 14 I6 17 18,: at 77 126 5 2t j " 9 ew ere $ ( ZONE 1 • Y2 31 14178 127 2 g S 9AYSIDE A T ? LINE 32 79 1284sa Iis g eel 3 h / 8 ? S w q 4 8 3 33 gp 129 4y7 4,`? 4 5 B 7 6 92 f0 ?f 12 1] t4 15 r?r1 B 12 11 `y ?R•6? E 4 sr gt 1J0 10 a 5 Q ? • B ° 0` qty '7 qy " 34 g2 u, S C ? I y g 132 g ?" 6 3 H , a 4? ° 4 [4 ?, ? q 35 84 1 3 7 E AA0 tJd E g ,q y ?' B • °$ Ad' 67 "a F 9 G 440 NEST 10 D CONDO t1 8 r e A ' 1 S,l H e 22-27 P T 3 4 6 B pA>,?AY C =03 0 O a -04 7 g ;? °? / 8/99 - - - - - - - ' ` $- 9 - - - ,a - -- -- ZONING ATLAS All, ? Z85A SW 1/4 OF SECTION - /? A F 7RRR 1 8 - ?c c_ to 1 R A 9 7 0 r 6/3/05 Mixed Use Calculation for Adams Mark Property - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR =1.0 and maximum density = 30 du/acre) 1. Permitted FAR ..................................................................1.0 2. Building square footage of non-residential portion .....................x 2,910 sf 3. Lot area required to support non-residential use in the building ......= 2,910 sf 4. Lot area of upland ............................................................ 81,450 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non-residential use in the building (#A3) .................................... 2,910 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ....= 78,540 sf 7. Divide #A6 ..................................................................... 78,540 sf 8. Land area in an acre .........................................................- 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage ....................................................................= 1.803 acres 10. Multiply lot acreage ........................................................... 1.803 acres 11. Maximum density ............................................................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ......................... = 54 du B. Transfer of Development Riuhts (TDR) 1. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ............................ 54 du 2. Multiply by maximum transfer of 20% of #B1 ...........................x 0.2 3. Maximum number of du to be transferred in to this property ..........= 10 du C. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA)............ 217 rooms (Terminated through FLD2005-01005) 2. Subtract new OVA rooms/units ............................................ . 78 rooms 3. Remaining OVA rooms/units .............................................. . 139 4. Conversion of OVA to dwelling units (40/30 rule) .................... . 104 du 5. Add in TDR (#B3) .......................................................... 10 du 6. Total number of dwelling units allowable .............................. = 114 du 7. Divide #A3 .................................................................. 2,910 sf 8. By land area to support 1 dwelling unit (43,560 sf _ 30 du/acre) .... = 1,452 sf 9. Number of dwelling units = to #A2 ...................................... .... 2 du 10. Subtract #C9 from #C6 for Maximum Number of Dwelling Units in conjunction with Commercial floor area (#A2) ...........................112 du • ?J 5/1 /05 Mixed Use Calculation for Adams Mark Property - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR = 1.0 and maximum density = 30 du/acre) 1. Permitted FAR ..................................................................1.0 2. Building square footage of non-residential portion .....................x 14,520 sf 3. Lot area required to support non-residential use in the building ......= 14,520 sf 4. Lot area of upland ............................................................ 81,017 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non-residential use in the building (#A3) .................................. 14,520 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ....= 66,497 sf 7. Divide #A6 ..................................................................... 66,497 sf 8. Land area in an acre .......................................................... 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage ..... ............................................................= 1.526 acres 10. Multiply lot acreage ........................................................... 1.526 acres 11. Maximum density ..........................................................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ....................... = 45 du B. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) 1. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ......................... 45 du 2. Multiply by maximum transfer of 20% of #B1 ........................x 0.2 3. Maximum number of du to be transferred in to this property .........= 9 du C. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA)............ 217 rooms (Terminated through FLD2005-01005) 2. Conversion of OVA to dwelling units (40/30 rule) ..................... 162 du 3. Add in TDR (#B3) .......................................................... 9 du 4. Total number of dwelling units allowable ..............................= 171 du 5. Divide #A3 .................................................................. 14,520 sf 6. By land area to support 1 dwelling unit (43,560 sf - 30 du/acre) .... = 1,452 sf 7. Number of dwelling units = to #A2 ........................................ 10 du 8. Subtract #C7 from #C4 for Maximum Number of Dwelling Units in conjunction with Commercial floor area (#A2) .......................... .161 du • 0 DENSITY CALCULATIONS 430 S. GULFVIEW BOULEVARD REDEVELOPMENT 217 Existing Hotel Rooms - 78 New Hotel Rooms 139 Remaining Hotel Density Units x 3/a Conversion Factor (30 condominium units to 40 hotel units) 104 (104.25 rounded down to 104) + 11 Transferred Density Rights (Comp Plan Density of 57 times 20%) 115 Condominium Units - 113 Condominiums (91 Tower Homes; 22 Caribbean Villas) - 2 `Condominium-Equivalent' Commercial Space (3,000 s.f. Commercial) 0 Remainder 0 0 D?ftkff 1.35 pm Case Number: FLD2005-05047 -- 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD • Owner(s): M S P A Acquisition Ii O? C/O Morgan Stanley Re Funds New York, Ny 10036 D TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email ILCP Applicant Tw/ Beach Residence-Clearwater.Llc 877 Executive Center Dr W 205 St Petersburg, F133702 N TELEPHONE: 727-563-9882, FAX: 727-563-9674, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-441-8617, E-MAIL: ed@jpfirm.com Location: 2.45 acres located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approxima tely 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach. Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 112 attached dwelling units, 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 square feet of retail sales with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 feet to x feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to x feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to eight feet from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section, 2-803.C; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, two dwelling units from 625-627 Bay Esplanade, two dwelling units from 665 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood 440 West, Inc. Condominium Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 440 S Gulfview Blvd #203 TELEPHONE: 461-2885, FAX: 442-6628, E-MAIL: et440@juno.com Neighborhood Continental Towers Association(s): Cleawater, F133767 675 S Gulfview #1002 TELEPHONE: 727-449-9189, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: fandjnassif@webtv.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff. Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Blackburn Applicant: Ed Armstrong, Jayne Sears, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 36 1. Southern driveway apron shall not extend beyond extended side property line. 2. Brick paver driveway aprons not consistent with Beach Walk template. 3. Proposed sidewalk shall include 4x8 concrete paver band as shown on Beach Walk Sheet No. HD-11. Conduits or sleeves shall be installed beneath these pavers to provide for irrigation and/or electric power. 4. Palm trees shall be installed in the ROW in accordance with Beach Walk Sheet Nos. LS-2 and LS-3. 5. Proposed modifications to City parking lot would impact City irrigation system. 6. All landscaping/hardscaping shall be coordinated with Beach Walk design. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Applicant shall obtain a separate right-of-way permit for the brick paver driveway and driveways shall be constructed in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #113. 2. Need to show all city details applicable to this project. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www.myclearwater.com/engineer, go to "Documents and Publications", then to Engineering Construction Standards, then select the applicable details. 3. Need to install a gate valve on both sides of proposed backflow device(s). 4. Street lateral manhole connection and cleanout shall be installed in compliance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Indices #302 and #304 respectively. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application Environmental: 1 . 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. 2. Please submit sea turtle friendly lighting design and installation details prior to building permit. (per Development Code; Section 3-1302-d and City Or.6928-02) Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 37 1 . This DRC ReviewTy Fire is not an approval or review of any consi tion plans or documents other than site work. 2. Show on the plan fire hydrant(s) withing 300 ft of the most remote point of the building, as the hose is laid. Due to the dimensions of the building(s) more than one hydrant may be necessary.Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 3. Any ramps over vaults which fire or emergency vehicles might be expected to travel must be designed to HS-25 specifications. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Building(s) to be protected by NFPA-13 fire sprinkler system. FDC must be at least 15 ft off the building and within 40 of a hydrant dedicated to the fire sprinkler system. Due to the size and dimensions of the proposed building(s) more than the one hydrant shown may be necessary. If there is to be more than one sprinkler system, an FDC and hydrant dedicated to the sprinkler system are required. Please respond and provide additional information PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Provide a standpipe water suply with 2 1/2 inch connection and 1 1/2 inch adaptor with breakable cover and chain within 100 feet of any pier/land intersection. As per NFPA-303. Please respond to this commet and show rear hydrant on the plans PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Note: From the preliminary plans submitted for this DRC site plan review, the proposed building appears to be a high rise and will be required to meet the requirements of the high rise package including but not limited to fire command room, voice evacuation fire alarm, pressurized stairwells, enclosed elevator lobbies, fire fighter phones, etc. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 7. All drain covers and grates in drive aisles must meet the requirements of HS-20 specifications. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 8. Clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of each fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 9. Clearance of 7 1/2 feet to the front, sides and rear of each FDC are required to be maintained. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 10. 6/27/05 Fire command room shall be above BFE (base flood elevation). 11 . 6/27/05 Provide FDC for Standpipe. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . The tree survey and inventory is incomplete. There is a row of trees behind tree numbers 31 through 40. Include these trees prior to Building Permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 38 1 . Per Section 3-120PD. all landscaping must be protected from vehicur and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Show such curbing on Sheet 3/13 and the landscaping plans, with details, for the driveways on the north and east, including the south side of the taxi parking spaces. 2. Provide a landscape plan for the landscaping on the ground level and a separate landscape plan for the landscaping on the platform level, as it is very difficult to review what is on the platform above versus on the ground, especially in regard to the height of trees in relation to building overhangs. 3. Unclear as to note on Sheet L-2 stating "no planting improvements seaward of the CCCL line west of the building." Plans indicate plantings within the CCCL on the north side, if it is a concern. However, there is no Code restriction on plantings within the CCCL. 4. Indicate the location of sod on Sheet L-2 and provide construction details for such. 5. Landscape improvements, including irrigation, is proposed on City property to the north. Who will maintain and whose irrigation is it that is proposed on our property (Adam's Mark irrigation or ours)? Provide explanation/details. 6. Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Dimension the depth from the front property line of the landscaped areas east of the retail/lobby area and either side of the fountain on the north portion. These areas will be counted toward the foundation landscaping requirement. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide a copy of approved SWFWMD permit or exemption to Development Services. Solid Waste: 1 , To many units for roll out service The hotel will produce much more waste then the condos please consider a compactor for your solid waste needs. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 39 1.The proposed northern driveway and resulting modifications to the?ity parking lot exit would negatively impact the operation of the City lot and shall not be permitted. The proposed modifications involve the loss of one of the existing pay stations. A motorist wishing to enter the development parking lot would be required to enter the City lot, take a pay ticket and circle the lot to gain access to the development lot. The City lot is closed at certain times (lot full - nights) thereby eliminating access to the development lot. 2.How will proposed gates be operated? 3.Are the public spaces going to be free or metered? If metered please show parking meters or a means of payment. 4.The vertical clear height of parking garage must be 8'2". Show across section of parking garage showing pipes and other structures that may impede in this height requirement. 5.The covered hotel drop off area must meet ADA requirements of 114 inches clear vertical height. 6.H/C parking spaces must be strategically placed to nearest accessible entrance i.e. elevators. 7.Remove walls that impede motorists line of sight when backing out of parking spaces. 8.Spacing between driveways must be a minimum of 125'. (Community Development Code Section 3-102.D.1.) 9.Where will moving vans and trucks stage when loading or unloading large household items? 10.Where will delivery trucks stage for commercial/retail deliveries? 11.Provide a diagram showing a standard passenger car (18' long) making the turns at all corners of the parking garage and porte-cochere. The turning vehicle must not encroach in the opposing lane. 12.Demonstrate accessible path from public sidewalk to the site's accessible entrance and from building A to building B. 13. Civil Site Plan Sheet 3 of 13 indicates columns obstructing the south drive aisle. This drive aisle shall be 24'-wide and clear of obstructions. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: General note: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 40 Under the prior apOication FLD2005-01005, the site data indicated *t area to be 106,500 square feet (2.444 acres), with 81,017 square feet of upland (1.859 acres) zoned Tourist (T) and 25,483 square feet of submerged land (0.585 acre) zoned Open Space/Recreation (OS/R). Under the present application, the site data indicates the lot area to be 97,574 square feet (2.239 acres, but stated on the Site Plan as 2.45 acres) and 81,450 square feet of upland (1.869 acres). Revise the lot area acreage on the Cover Sheet. Unclear as to the reduction in the overall lot area by 8,926 square feet (which appears to be in submerged land)? Need to correct the overall lot acreage if the 97,574 square feet is correct. Also unclear why in the Legal Description on the Cover Sheet the land area is indicated as 106,504.22 square feet, which is not listed anywhere else on the site data. 2. Show or indicate the location of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701). 3. Show or indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. 4. Provide the floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses as part of the land use data on Civil cover sheet. 5. Revise the Landscape Plan Sheet L-1 to show sight visibility triangles according to Code requirements. 6. A Comprehensive Landscape Program has been submitted, but has not detailed what requirements of the Code are being asked to be modified or waived. There are no landscape buffers or interior landscape area required by this proposal. Advise as to the reason for the submittal or remove the application. 7. A letter has been submitted as to the color scheme proposed. On the building elevations, please indicate the different Areas 1-3 so there is no confusion as to the Areas proposed. 8. Provide color samples/chips of the proposed exterior building colors. 9. Based on the acreage submitted and approved under FLD2005-01009 of 0.259 acres (11,292 square feet), which produces only seven dwelling units maximum (based on 30 du/acre), revise the TDR application on Page 2 for the "size of site" and "number of development rights allocated to this site" for the sender site. Note: Under FLD2005-01009, this sender site was approved for five dwelling units. 10. Revise Page 2 of the TDR application for 667 Bay Esplanade (sender site) to show the "site of site" as 0.269 acre and the number of "development rights allocated to this site" as eight dwelling units. 11 . Revise the proposed density on the Cover Sheet to provide the residential density (113 dwelling units), the overnight accommodation density (78 rooms) and the floor area ratio (for the 2,910 square-foot retail portion). 12. Recommend providing two parking spaces per dwelling unit. 13 . Pursuant to Section 3-905.A, setbacks shall be measured from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). Provide the proposed rear (west) and side (north) setbacks in the Land Use Data table on the Cover Sheet and on Sheet 3/13. Provide complete justification why measurement from the CCCL cannot be complied with and the complete justification as to how this proposed reductions will not "adversely affect the safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood" (General Applicability criteria #3) and "redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviation" (Comp Infi11 criteria #1) and how "flexibility in regard to...required setbacks... are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity" (Comp Infill criteria #8). 14. Provide proposed setbacks to the tower outline on Sheet 3/13 and in the Land Use Data table on the Cover Sheet. 15. Provide/show on all appropriate sheets, including landscaping, the required egress sidewalk from the doors on the west side to the public way, as required by the Building Code. 16. Site plan and Landscape plan sheets place the front of the building and South Gulfview Blvd. on the right side of the sheet. Revise the architectural plans to have the same orientation. 17. Provide parking stall counts per floor on the Cover Sheet. Note in the Land Use Data table that two of the parking spaces proposed are dedicated to taxis. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 41 18 . Provide the width •e sidewalk along the south side of the proper0 ty. Unclear why this sidewalk must be placed in the center of this 15-foot wide area such that it breaks up the landscape area to provide meaningful and cohesive landscaping. Revise or provide justification. Also unclear why, as shown on Sheet L-1, that this walkway needs to be constructed of pavers, since this is the access to roll dumpsters out to the trash staging area. Pavers create more noise when rolling the dumpsters. This also includes the trash staging area and the driveway to it (shown on Sheet L-1). Revise. 19. Unclear why a gate is proposed on the north side of the Level 1 parking. Provide justification or remove. 20. Unclear why there is a paved area on the north side west of the driveway from the City parking lot, that is indicated on Sheet L-1 for "retail" when there is no retail floor area in this location. Provide complete details as the operational aspects of this area or remove. 21 . Provide the square footage of the retail space on Level 1 on Sheet 3/13. 22. Columns shown on Sheet 3/13 north of taxi parking spaces impede drive aisle and produce a drive aisle less than Code required width of 24 feet. Revise. 23 . Sheet 3/13 indicates three kiosks. Provide complete details as to purpose and design. 24. Sheet L-1 indicates a "covered retail area" (east) and "specialty paved retail plaza" (two locations, north and east). Provide complete details as to proposal with all operational characteristics, including square footage of each area. If so desired, must request "outdoor retail sales, display and/or storage" as a use (see Commercial District, Table 2-703 and criteria under 2-703.L), also providing all required parking. 25 . Landscaping shown on Sheet L-2 on the northeast corner of the property does not take into account the utility and fire department requirements, as shown on Sheet 10/13. Coordinate proposed landscaping with these needs/requirements. 26. Sheet 3/13 - The legend indicates a dashed line as the "tower outline (floor 4 and up), however, there is a dashed line approximately 20 feet back from and parallel with S. Gulfview Blvd. that appears to conflict with the line as intended to show. Advise/revise. 27. Sheets 3/13 and L-2 - Are there outdoor lights proposed along the seawall? There are what appears to be light symbols indicated (ghosted in). If provided, unclear as to need. Advise/remove or show as proposed lighting (no ghosting). 28. Revise Sheet A1.01 in Building Area Tabulations for condo parking, as the required amount (as indicated on the Cover Sheet for civil plans) is 170 spaces (not 113). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 42 29 . Proposal is for 113 welling units, which is one too many dwelling units. Revise Cover Sheet for civil plans and Sheet A 1.01. See calculation below: Mixed Use Calculation for Adams Mark Property - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR= 1.0 and maximum density = 30 du/acre) 1. Permitted FAR LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLI.O 2. Building square footage of non-residential portion LLZLLLLx 2,910 sf 3. Lot area required to support non-residential use in the building Z4= 2,910 sf 4. Lot area of upland LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 81,450 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non-residential use in the building (#A3) 2,910 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units Z.= 78,540 sf 7. Divide #A6 LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 78,540 sf 8. Land area in an acre LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL- 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL - 1.803 acres 10. Multiply lot acreage LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 1.803 acres 11. Maximum density LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLX 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted LLLLLU6. = 54 du B. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) 1. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ZZZUZZL.L 54 du 2. Multiply by maximum transfer of 20% of #B1 LZZLZL6L6x 0.2 3. Maximum number of du to be transferred into this property 6L.L= 10 du C. Maximum Development Potential for Property 1. Existing Overnight Accommodation Rooms/Units (OVA)ZZZ4 217 rooms (Terminated through FLD2005-01005) 2. Subtract new OVA rooms/unitsZLZZLUZZ LZLL..- 78 rooms 3. Remaining OVA rooms/unitsLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL•• 139 4. Conversion of OVA to dwelling units (40/30 rule) LLLLLLL 104 du 5. Add in TDR (#B3)LZLLLZLLLLLLLLLULL.. 10 du 6. Total number of dwelling units allowable LLZZ"L"L= 114 du 7. Divide #A3 LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 2,910 sf 8. By land area to support 1 dwelling unit (43,560 sf - 30 du/acre) Z.- 1,452 sf 9. Number of dwelling units = to #A2 LLLLLLLLLLLLLL 2 du 10. Subtract #C9 from #C6 for Maximum Number of Dwelling Units in conjunction with Commercial floor area (#A2)..ZZL?LLLL.112 du 30. Parking calculations on the Cover Sheet for civil plans indicate that a total of 263 spaces are required for the proposed retail, condo dwellings and hotel rooms. However, on Sheet A2.01 indicates 23 public parking spaces. With only 277 total spaces being provided (which includes two spaces dedicated to taxis), unclear how 23 spaces are above and beyond the required parking for this site. Provide explanation. 31 . Sheet A2.01 indicates a "sundeck" on the west side of the building, however, it appears to be inside the walls of the building. Provide explanation. If outside, revise all appropriate civil, landscape and architectural plans for the ground level to indicate such open area and to indicate how this area is accessed. 32. Provide the square footages of all of the attached dwelling (condominium) units (including the villas) and all of the hotel rooms. 33 . Level 4 - Single hotel unit within, and accessed solely through, the club amenity area seems out of place. Explain. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 43 • 34. Unit count on the civil plans Cover Sheet (11 units) and as indicated on elevations on Sheet A3.01, there are hotel units on Level 11. However, there are no hotel units indicated on Level 11 on Sheet A2.06. Explain. 35 . Sheet A2.07 - There is a trellis proposed on the roof south of Unit G on Level 12. What is the purpose of the trellis, as there does not appear to be any access by Unit G to use this trellis or roof area? Also, this roof area south of Unit G is indicated as "roof below" where it is actually the roof of Unit H on Level 11, at the same level as Level 12. Revise. 36. Sheet A2.08 - Unclear as to the purpose of the "loggia" east of Unit C for both Levels 14 & 15. Explain. 37 . Dimensions and depictions to the sides of the elevations on Sheets A.301, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 do not line up with the elevations themselves, as the floor levels go through windows. Correct/revise for all sheets. Ensure correctness to scale of drawings. 38. Elevations on Sheets A3.01 and A3.02 indicate something different on the south sides of Levels 12 and 13 than what the floor plans indicate (trellis or enclosed area ??). Revise/make consistent. 39. The parapets dimensioned on Sheets A3.01 through A3.04 are not accurate at 2'-6" (much higher). Provide correct dimensions. 40. Sheet A3.03 - Elevation is inaccurate as to height of area east of Unit C on Level 15 (building area of elevator/stairs need to go one floor higher). Revise. 41 . Sheet A3.04 indicates windows, balconies and other features on Levels 11 through 15 that are not indicated on the floor plans. Revise and/or explain. 42. Revise Exhibit B of the application to correct the number of proposed condominium dwelling units (112 dwellings). Include the outdoor retail sales, display and storage use with its proposed square footage. 43. Revise Exhibit B - Termination of nonconforming status is not necessary, as this was approved under FLD2005-01005. Remove as part of the request. Note: The proposal includes the conversion of these overnight accommodation units to dwelling units. 44. Amend the request to include a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as S. Gulfview is an arterial street per the Comprehensive Plan (criteria for attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and retail sales). Provide justification for the deviation. 45 . It appears the building is located within the visibility triangles on the north side of the southern driveway on S. Gulfview Blvd. and the driveway on the north. Please confirm. If so located, include as part of the application and provide complete justification for such encroachment from a vehicular and pedestrian safety standpoint. 46. Exhibit B, Section B, includes a request to the rear setback for structures other than buildings from 20 feet to 16 feet. Unclear what this is requesting, as there isn't any setback indicated on the civil plans at 16 feet, nor something "other than a building" shown. Explain. 47. General Applicability criteria #1 - Provide a detailed analysis of how this project is "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located." 48. General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide a detailed analysis of how this project will not "significantly impair the value" of adjacent land and buildings. 49. General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a detailed response to show how this project "will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood," including the location and number of driveways. 50. General Applicability criteria #4 - Provide the information provided to the Traffic Operations Division to the Planning Department, so that it is part of the application file. However, this pertains to a Traffic Impact Analysis. Provide a response of how this project "minimizes traffic congestion" by defining "adequate" drive aisles and stacking space at the driveways. 51 . General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project is "consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel." Provide specific information regarding surrounding building uses, height, mass, etc. 52. General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project "minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties." It is noted that the "peaceful, bright courtyard, water features and verandas" are mostly on the fourth level, where the general public will not even see these features. Provide the operational characteristices (hours of operation, etc.) that are proposed for the retail portions of this development, especially the "outdoor retail sales, display and storage" use. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 44 53 . Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Project criteria #1 -Describe rail how this redevelopment project is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards," including all of the reductions to setbacks (including the CCCL) and increases to height (see "request" prepared by staff). The cupolas are purely decorative and are not proposed to "hide various mechanical equipment," which is why the project is meeting the Code provisions for a maximum of 16 feet above the roof deck for the elevator and mechanical equipment for the "overruns." 54. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project is "compatible with adjacent land uses." 55 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project will "upgrade the immediate vicinity" of this property. The City has a project called Beach Walk. What portion(s) of Beach Walk is the applicant constructing that otherwise wouldn't have been constructed by the City? Unclear how the fountain (only one on the ground level), the plaza (I assume you mean the plaza up on the fourth level, which the general public will not enjoy or see) and the retail uses "improve the pedestrian access and enjoyment of this area of the beach." Provide details. 56. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 - Provide a detailed response as to how this project "creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Provide details as to the surrounding area. 57 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - Provide detailed responses as to how flexibility for this project "are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole," specifically as to the following: 1. Termination of Nonconforming Status - This was addressed under FLD2005-01005. Remove from application. 2. Height - Provide a detailed response, in accordance with Section 4-1403.C.4, as to how this project's increased height provides a "reasonable relationship between the number of units transferred and any increases in building height." Provide the number of units above 100 feet. Also address the other portion of this Section that states "Compatibility with the surrounding area and feasibility of the project shall be considered when approving any increase in height." 3. Setbacks - Unclear as to relief is being sought in relation to the "incorporation of the Beach Walk improvements into the site, along the easterly and northerly boundaries." Provide details as to how the City's Beach Walk project is impacting the redevelopment of this site in a manner that setback reductions must be requested. Application does not provide a clear reason why compliance with the setback requirements measured from the CCCL is a problem. 58 . Provide a detailed response to the TDR criteria of Section 4-1403.A: 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses; 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 59. Provide a detailed response to Section 4-1403.C.3 - "Appropriate view corridors are incorporated in the design of the parcel proposed for development and all design standards in Article 3 Division 5 are otherwise satisfied." 60. Due to the nature of the proposed design, it is recommended to provide a perspective drawing to assist in understanding the views and massing of this project (at least looking southwest). 61 . Mass/Bulk Review - It is stated in #4 that at least 68% of the facades are covered with architectural accents, windows or decorative railings. Provide the percentage calculated for each facade. 62. Mass/Bulk Review #8 - There is only one fountain on the ground level, not fountains. Revise. 63 . Tower Separation # 1 e - Provide the square footages of the floorplates over 45 feet in height that you are requesting a deviation from. 64. Concerned with the proposed "outdoor retail sales, display and storage" use in relation to the Beach by Design Design Guideline for "Street-Level Facades" #4 on Page 62 which states "Goods for sale will not be displayed outside of a building, except as a permitted temporary use. This does not apply to outdoor food service establishments." Advise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 45 65 . Provide a response to Beach by Design Design Guidelines for "fount." on Page 65. 66. Provide color rendered drawings (at least the front elevation) to show the intended color scheme of the buildings. Also provide 8.5"x11" reductions to Planning for presentation at the CDB. 67. Are there any storage units on the ground level (below FEMA line) for unit owners? If so, show location and design. 68. Proposal intends the overnight accommodation rooms/units to be "condo-hotel." As such, provide the operational characteristics of the hotel. If approved, the following condition will be recommended: "That the use of the southern building on this property be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 days, where occupancy of rooms/units arise from a rental agreement, other agreement or the payment of consideration. At the request of the City Manager or designee, the records of the business shall be made available for examination to determine whether the length of stay complies with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines, revocation of the occupational license and/or any other enforcement afforded by law or by City regulations. A license must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, shall be maintained. This portion of the development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall rooms/units qualify for homestead exemption or home or business occupational licenses." 69. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program." 70. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits." 71 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks." 72. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits." 73 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid." 74. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits." 75 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work." 76. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB." 77. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy." 78 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy." Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 46 79. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: "That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 557/579 Cyprus Avene, 625/627 Bay Esplanade, 665 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 557/579 Cyprus Avene, 625/627 Bay Esplanade, 665 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site 557/579 Cyprus Avene, 625/627 Bay Esplanade, 665 Bay Esplanade and 667 Bay Esplanade shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits." Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 8/16/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 7/7/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 47 Community Response Team v? Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. Meeting Date: Location: ! 3 0 lS?'' V' ,? Current Use: 47-t, Active Code Enforcement Case -no yes: ,z' Address number-(y s) (no) (vacant land) ,p.-Landscapin ye (no) ,p- Overgrown (yes) gno ,a-'-Debris (yes) no ,,Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes 0(no pr-Building(s) goo (fair) (poor) (vacant land) ,o' Fencing (none) go (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) Paint (good) fair (poor) (garish) ,p- Grass Parking (yes no ,,a- Residential Parking Violations (yes) (no ,a- Signage (none (ok) (not ok) (billboard) ?a Parking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) W) fW6 Cd Dumpst t??9 not enclosed) ,AT' Outdoor storage (yes)0 Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date: 014'5- Reviewed by: Telephone: Sba-qI-) a S- Revised 03- 9-01; 02-04-03 1?ivision of Corporations • Page 1 of 2 a V, V, 3 Tlrrt?zl? ?.rrlii g Florida Limited Liability TW/BEACH RESIDENCES - CLEARWATER, L.L.C. PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR. W. SUITE 205 ST. PETERSBURG FL 33702-2472 US MAILING ADDRESS 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR. W. SUITE 205 ST. PETERSBURG FL 33702-2472 US Document Number FEI Number L05000050088 NONE State Status FL ACTIVE Total Contribution 0.00 Registered Date Filed 05/19/2005 Effective Date NONE Name & Address SPENCER, MARC I 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR. W. SUITE 205 ST. PETERSBURG FL 33702-2472 Manager/Member Detail Titl e Name & Address TAYLOR WOODROW U.S. TOWER, INC. 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR. W., SUITE 205 MGRM ST. PETERSBURG FL 33702-2472 US http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al =DETFIL&n1=LO5000050088&n2=NAMFWD... 6/3/2005 1'2ivision of Corporations 0 • Page 2 of 2 % Annual Reports 11 Report Year Filed Date Previous Filing Return to List Next Filing No Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry Corporations Help http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&nl =L05000050088&n2=NAMFVYD... 6/3/2005 PinEllas County Property App40 r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0316 Page 2 of 6 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 0330 03-Jun-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:37:38 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales M S P A ACQUISITION II OBK: 13283 OPG: 2290 C/O MORGAN STANLEY RE FUNDS 1585 BROADWAY 37TH FLR NEW YORK NY 10036-8200 EVACUATION ZONE: A Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 430 S GULFUIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 12/2,003 13,283/2,290 20,138,200 (U) I 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012-013 0 /1,977 4,591/1,704 5,125,000 (0) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,972 3,7881 655 1,699,500 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,970 3,400/ 556 890,000 (Q) U 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 16,100,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 16,100,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 16,100,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Gulf Of Mexico Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 369,807.34 1) 255 x 314 110. 00 80,070. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 1'000.00 .49 A 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 369, 807. 34 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 369, 807.34 Short Legal LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUB LOTS 33, 34 & 35 & PT OF Description LOT 36 & SUBM LAND ON W PER O.R. 7651542 ALL DESC Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r-.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/3/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0316 Page 3 of 6 Property and Land Use Code descriptions • Building_I • BuildiM 2. Building #1 07 / 29 / 15 1 52380 1000 / 0330 :01 03-Jun-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:37:52 Commercial Card 01 of 2 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel ) 3 St Property Address: 430 S GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 Structural Elomonts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 645 Bath Tile Floor + Half Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,974 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 30 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 128,286 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 1,450 8) . 00 0 3) Utility .40 3,423 9) .00 0 4) Canopy .25 1'050 10) . 00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C omm s r (--i a1 E x t r a F o at ur s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) CONC PAUE 24000 3.00 24,000 72,000 72,000 999 2) ELEU PASS 139TOP 30,000.00 3 90,000 36,000 1,974 3) POOL 1137 60,000.00 1 60,000 24,000 1,974 4) SPA/JAC/HT 13'01 10,000.00 1 10,000 4,000 1,974 5) ELEU STOP 13STOP 3,500.00 39 136,500 54,600 1,974 6) GAZEBO 222SF 25.00 222 5,550 4,270 1,996 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 194,870 Building #2 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l&a--l &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/3/2005 r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 03 Page 4 of 6 Pinellas County Property App 0 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 0330 :02 03-Jun-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:38:16 Commercial Card 02 of 2 Improvement Type: Parking Garage Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 Structural Elements Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Corrugated Asbestos Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish None Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 0 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,974 Effective Age 20 Other Depreciation 50 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 92,000 7) . 00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C omms r c i a 1 E x t r a F at ur s s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) FENCE 50LF 8.00 50 400 320 1,997 2) FIRESPRINK 92000 1.75 92,000 161,000 144,900 1,996 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 145,220 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) Fil aa http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/3/2005 Pine:las County Property Apprio r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 034 A30 GULF?`iE'? B 'D 44cJ GULFVIEW DLVD 29246 450 UhFVff* Page 5 of 6 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/3/2005 Pincllas County Property App, *r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 06 Page 6 of 6 Back_._to._Search.. Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b= l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/3/2005 CITY OF CLEARWATER • NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, August 16, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont from 07-19-05) Home Energy, LLC. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 144.63 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 feet (to patios) and from 10 ft to 8 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 43.17 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 5.5 ft (from roof deck) and an additional 13.67 ft for an open rooftop pavilion (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2404.F, with reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 8 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape • buffer along the south side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [4 townhomes and 16 condominiums]) at 415 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 17 and part of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-04035 2. (Cont from 07-19-05) Beach & Gulf Sands, Inc., & North Clearwater Beach Development (Anthony Menna) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings in the Tourist District and an increase in ht from 35 ft to 64 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches, permit 2 parking spaces within the required sight visibility triangles along Bay Esplanade, a reduction in the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and 3 ft (to trash staging area), reduction in the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), 10 ft (to pool) and 7 ft (to building), reduction in the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 feet (to trash staging area) and a reduction the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 8 ft (to pool) and 10 ft (to building), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C., Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03019) of 2 dwelling units from 116 Brightwater Dr (donor site) to 657 Bay Esplanade (receiver site) under the provisions of Sec's 4- 1402 and 4-1403 and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity under the provisions of Sec 6-109. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [13 condominium units]) at 657 & 663 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-03032/TDR2005-03019 3. Religious Community Services, Inc. (The Haven of RCS) are requesting a Flexible • Development approval to permit a white PVC fence 6 ft in ht within the front (east) setback along North Saturn Ave without substantial grill work and masonry columns and without a 3 foot wide 1 landscape strip on the street side of the fence as otherwise required by Sec's 3-804.A.1 and 3 on a • property within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) district, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-304.G. (Proposed Use: Community Residential Homes) at 1520 N Saturn Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 44.01. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05038 4. Ardent International Ltd Liability Co, Panayiotis Vasiloudes, and Helen Vasiloudes (M313 Development, LLC/Robert Szasz) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings in the Tourist District, an increase in ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches and a reduction the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft to pool deck and 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade and 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 1-3. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 5. TSE TSE, LLC (M3B Development, LLC/Robert Szasz) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings in the Tourist District, an increase in ht from 35 ft to 58 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches and a reduction the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 3.33 ft to pool deck and 6 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 629, 635 & 637 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 78, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05044 • 6. First Baptist Church of Clearwater (Opus South Corporation, Opus South Contractor's LLC/John Franklin Wade) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow a mixed-use development of 157 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 31 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 10,022 sq ft of non-residential use, with an increase to the permitted ht from 30 ft to 271 ft (to roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments and mechanical equipment (from roof deck), to reduce the non-residential parking requirement from 41 parking spaces to zero (0) parking spaces, and to allow a building within the required sight visibility triangle at the intersection of Cleveland St and North Osceola Ave, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C., and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along N Osceola Ave, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Mixed-use [169 attached dwellings and 10,022 sq ft non- residential floor area]) at 331 Cleveland St, John R Davey's Resub Blk A, Part of Lots 1-3 & unplatted parcel. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05048 7. Clearwater Land Ltd (Druid Courtyard Clearwater, LLC/Nicholas F Ferraioli) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 47 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to entry feature columns) and from 25 ft to 18.5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 4 ft (to entry feature columns) and from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement and pool deck), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to entry feature column), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 1.9 ft (to entry feature column) and an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 55 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets, under the provisions of Sec 2-504.A. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [47 condominiums]) at 1105 Druid Rd, Sec 15-29-15, M&B 34.03. Assigned • Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP. FLD2005-05037 0 0 8. Religious Community Services, Inc. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit • the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing social/public service agency with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 58 ft (along Myrtle Ave), a reduction to the front (south along Druid Rd) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Ave) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Rd (south) from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.4 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Expansion and renovation of the RCS food bank) at 700 Druid Rd, Magnolia Park, Blk 26, Lots 9 & 10 & parts of Lots 1-5 & 8. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05046 9. Ronald and Karen Kozan (Newkirk Ventures, Inc.) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (26 existing and proposed attached dwelling units; 20 dwelling units maximum under land use category), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 26 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 144.65 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to building) from 25 ft to 20 ft (to balcony), from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6.1 ft (to balconies) and from 10 ft to 5.4 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 6.1 ft (to • balconies) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building height from 30 ft to 46 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 6 ft (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F, and reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to 5.4 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [26 condominiums]) at 405 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 15 and part of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05045 10. Camille Courtney & Elina Honicky (Henry C. Kyle, III & Robert Elder) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow an addition to an existing single-family residence with a reduction to the front setback from 25 ft to 20.3 ft (to building), under the provisions of Sec 2- 304.G. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 1415 San Juan Court, Blvd Heights, Blk K, Lot 17 and part of Lot 18. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-05052 11. DiVello Land Trust, Fulvio DiVello Trustee (Maddalina DiVello & Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (111 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 83 dwelling units), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 83 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south along S. Gulfview Blvd.) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (west along Hamden Dr) from 15 ft to 12.5 ft (to building and proposed pavement), from 15 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) • from 10 ft to 3 ft (to existing pavement) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter • • parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22.5 ft for elevator and stair towers (from roof deck) • and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [83 condominiums]) at 445 Hamden Dr and 504 S Gulfview Blvd, Columbia Sub No. 5, Lots 4-11, and RIP rts and land adj to Lot 11. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05051 12. TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC (E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 112 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units, 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 sq ft of retail sales with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 6 ft (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 8 ft from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 ft 100 ft for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 ft to 150 ft for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 ft to 90 ft and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of 4 dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Ave, 2 dwelling units from 625-627 Bay Esplanade, 2 dwelling units from 665 Bay Esplanade and 3 dwelling units • from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Mixed use of 112 attached dwellings [condominiums], 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 sq ft of retail sales) at 430 South Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub, Lots 33-35, part of Lot 36 and subm land on W. Assigned Planner:C-Wd-y e IVI=Wells,. AICP; Planner 1I. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005-05022 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. r? U 0 0 Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be is available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 07/31/05 • 0 FLD2005-05047 = 252 1216352 ONTARIO INC 27 HARROWSMITH PL RICHMOND HILL ON L4E 2A1 CANADA 0 . U Vv 440 WEST, INC. CONDOMINIUM FRED WHITE 00030 440 SOUTH GULFVIEW BLVD, #203 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 ACOSTA, JOHN F ALCIATORE, GASTON 609 OLIVER CT ALCIATORE, NANCY J NORTH BRUNSWICK NJ 08902 - 4544 440 GULFVIEW BLVD #402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2510 ANASTASOPOULOS, GEORGE E ANASTASOPOULOS, EKATERINI 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 APPLE, JAMES R PO BOX 310474 TAMPA FL 33680 - 0474 ASKALANI LIVING TRUST ASKALANI, SANAA M BEN 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 BAKER, ROBERT E BAKER, ANN E 34 PLEASANT VIEW DR HANOVER PA 17331 - 8855 BARRY, DONALD J THE BARRY, JAMES J THE 743 MARKGRAFS LAKE DRAW WOODBURY MN 55129 - 8586 BERGER, RALPH F THE RYAN-BERGER, ELIZABETH E 7131 ASHVILLE PARK COLUMBUS OH 43235 - 5013 BIRA S A APDO 333 PANAMA ZONE 1 00000 - PANAMA ANDERSON, CRAIG S 610EHINTZRD ARLINGTON HGTS IL 60004 - 2601 ARENSKY,ARKANDY THE ARENSKY, ELIZABETH THE 2506 STONEBRIGHE LN NORTHBROOK IL 60062 - AYO, DENNIS H 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 BALOW, RONALD D THE FOLINO, JOHN F 27989 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 4906 BARTA, GYORGY BARTA,ZSUZSA 151 ORANGEWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7585 BILLINGSLEY, GARY R THE BILLINGSLEY, TAMERA 6883 N BUCK CREEK SHADES FAIRLAND IN 46126 - 9553 BLOSSER, ROBERT L BLOSSER, JANE A 583 E ST CARLISLE PA 17013 - A M P BELLINO INC 12016 WADSWORTH DR TAMPA FL 33626 - ALEXANDER, ANN W 6200 SW 37TH WAY GAINESVILLE FL 32608 - 5106 ANDERSON, JOHN C ANDERSON, REGINA W 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 ARQUILLA, MICHAEL P THE 1253 RICHFIELD CT WOODRIDGE IL 60517 - 7709 BAILEY, BEVERLY BAILEY, H AUBREY 103 KINGSBURY WOODS MIDDLESBORO KY 40965 - BANOUB,ATEF BANOUB, AMAL 486 KENT PL W HEMPSTEAD NY 11552 - 3340 BATIANIS, THOMAI 440.S GULFVIEW BLVD #1504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 BINNS, CRYSTAL A 1938 JARVIS RD COLUMBUS OH 43221 - 2772 BOESEN, ROBERT J BOESEN, CHRISTIE J 475 ALICES RD WAUKEE IA 50263 - 9637 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE BOLLING, CHRISTOPHER J BREMIS, JAMES J 6033 CRIMSON CT BOLLING, ALISON J BREMIS, SOPHIE MCLEAN VA 22101 - 1818 P O BOX 2696 1177 BROADWAY SOUTH PORTLAND ME 04116 - 2696 SOMERVILLE MA 02144 - 1742 BRETTSCHNEIDER, WILHELM 3050 BYRNWYCK # 209 MAUMEE OH 43537 - 9739 C B C I DEV GROUP LLC 475 CENTRAL AVE STE M8 ST PETERSBURG FL 33701 - CAMPBELL, JERRY D CAMPBELL, FELICIA N PO BOX 320500 FLINT MI 48532 - •BROTEMARKLE, MARTIN L SR TRUST POST, JO ANN 41130 FOX RUN RD # 509 NOVI MI 48377 - 4814 CALDERON, JULIO CALDERON, ROSARIO 9529 S KOLIN AVE OAK LAWN IL 60453 - 3226 CANTERBURY OAKS INC 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 4) BROWN, ALAN C BROWN, JUNE M 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #602 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 CALOUDIS, MARY THE 4078 CARROLL BLVD UNIVERSITY HT OH 44118 - 4516 CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT T L S HOLDINGS INC 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CARAYANNOPOULOS, GEORGE L CHAMPAGNE, ROLAND J CHESLER, RICHARD A CARAYANNOPOULOS, MARGARET P CHAMPAGNE, HELEN L HARVARD, ELIZABETH J 16 CHURCHILL RD 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 303 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1504 WINCHESTER MA 01890 - 1008 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 CHRISMAN, ROBERT D CLEARWATER BEACH ASSOCIATION CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS CHRISMAN, CAROLEE JAY KEYES COALITION 3428 ADAMS SHORE DR 100 DEVON DRIVE DOUG WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT WATERFORD MI 48329 - 4202 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33761 COLEMAN, WARREN P 1860 JANDALE TROY MI 48085 - CONNELL, PETER W 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2520 CONSTANTINIDES, NICHOLAS S CONSTANTINIDES, MICHAEL 1027 HILLEN ST BALTO MD 21202 - 4132 CONTINENTAL TOWERS 675 SOUTH GULFVIEW BLVD, #1002 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 D'AMICO, LOUIS J 410 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 DECADE GULFCOAST HOTEL PTNRS J K GULFVIEW N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR # 100 WAUKESHA WI 53188 - 1131 CURTIS, JAMES G CURTIS, JOHN G 343 S MAIN ST ANN ARBOR MI 48104 - 2137 DAMJANOVIC, TEREZO DAMJANOVIC, MARY 515 PARKHOLLOW LN PHILADELPHIA PA 19111 - 1365 DENICKE, WILLIS H JR THE DENICKE, ANTONIA M THE PO BOX 628 STEVENS POINT WI 54481 - 0628 CVETETIC, JOSEPH CVETETIC, MARY 5111 ESTES AVE SKOKIE IL 60077 - 3437 DEARNBARGER, WILLIAM L 5029 KILLOWEN CT COLUMBUS OH 43230 - 4008 DI VELLO LAND TRUST DI VELLO, FULVIO THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - DICKERSON, BETTY L DILLMAN, TOM L DIONNE, RICHARD M 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1002 DILLMAN, SUSAN J DIONNE, VICKI I CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1605 4736 ATKINS RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 CLYDE TWP MI 48049 - 4504 D IPPOLITO, ANTHONY DIVACO INC DOURDOUREKAS, HELEN D'IPPOLITO, LOUISE 455 S GULFVIEW BLVD 44 COMMONS DR 2925 CATHERINE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 PALOS PARK IL 60464 - 1299 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 2102 DUNN, RICHARD A DYBA, YOLANDA E. D. ARMSTRONG III, ESQ., COX, PHYLLIS D 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1201 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL 3600 CANTERBURY DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2529 & BURNS, LLP JEFFERSONTOWN KY 40299 - 3508 P.O. BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FL 33757 EKREN, YALCIN ERKEN, YALCIN FAHY, MICHAEL EKREN, FILIZ EKREN, FILIZ FAHY, MARY 3061 DEXBERRY CT 3061 DOX BERRY CT 16 LARK ST CLEARWATER FL 33761 - CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2003 PEARL RIVER NY 10965 - 2815 FATTOUCH, HANY A FELL, DONALD G FERGUSON, EDMUND FATTOUCH, SAMIA F FELL, DIANE M 6133 OAK VALLEY 5468 PINECREST DR 1744 STANTON AVE WHITMORE LAKE MI 48189 - 9739 LOCKPORT NY 14094 - 9014 GLENDALE CA 91201 - 2859 FIFTH SOUTH LLC FINTA, EMERY J THE FIRETTO, GRACE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1006 FINTA, PEGGY K THE VIOLA, MARY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 450 GULFVIEW BLVD #608 500 N 13TH ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 NEWARK NJ 07107 - 1318 FLAVAN, JOHN M FLYNN, JERRY C JR FOUR FORTY WEST ASSN INC 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1206 260 CHEESTANA WAY 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD STE 203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2529 LOUDON TN 37774 - 2527 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 FRANGEDIS, JOAN THE G T LEISURE CORP GABRIEL, FATHY S FRANGEDIS, MICHAEL GABRIEL, TERESA M 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 406 437 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2510 2399 HERONWOOD DR CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48302 - 0835 2508 GABRIEL, MAGDI GABRIEL, SAID S GABRIEL, SAID S GABRIEL, SOPHIE GABRIEL, ESMAT A GABRIEL, ESMAT A 15629 BAINTREE WAY 5 WHITE CEDAR LN 5 WHITECEDAR LN MISHAWAKA IN 46545 - 1536 HOLMDEL NJ 07733 - 2609 HOLMDEL NJ 07733 - 2609 GADDIS, SUSAN GAERTNER, ADAM GAMBA, WILLIAM C ALLEN, NANCY GAERTNER, ELISABETH 2062 LAKEVIEW AVE # A 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 305 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 507 BELLMORE NY 11710 - 4244 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 GAREL-JONES, PHILIP THE GEDDES, C ALEXANDER GERBER, GLYDWELL TRUST GAREL-JONES, BEATA THE 28 CRAYFORD DR GERBER, MARGARET TRUST 120 LANDSDOWNE RD S SCARBOROUGH ON M1W 3136 00030 831 BAYVIEW DR OTTAWA ON K1 M ON4 00030 - CANADA LAKE GENEVA W153147 - 3593 CANADA 0 GIADLA WERONIKA ?GIDARO ARDO GHALY, RAMSIS F HAL , GIADLA ALOJZY TILFORD, ROSEANNA WOODS 11136 INDIAN DR R , 355 S GULFVIEW BLVD 16130 WESTON RD - INDIAN HEAD PARK IL 6 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 KETTLEBY ON LOG 1J0 00030 - CANADA GIOTAKIS, WILLIAM C GLASBY, ALFRED CLEAVES, ROBERT N GIOTAKIS, MARIA GLASBY, KIMBERLY 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 6 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1108 902 BALD EAGLE LAKE RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ORTONVILLE MI 48462 - 8435 GLISE, JOHN INC GOEMAN, EMMA K THE GOGEL, EDWARD V 3900 MARKET ST 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1102 GOGEL, EILEEN CAMP HILL PA 17011 - 4226 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 60 ENCLAVE DR WINTER HAVEN FL 33884 - 1326 GRATIAS PROPERTIES LLC GRIMES, WALTER R GROUT, MARJORIE A THE 1350 NW 138TH ST STE 500 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #403 9912 CARRINGTON DR CLIVE IA 50325 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2522 KNOXVILLE TN 37923 - 1963 GUHL, PATRICIA J TR GUIRGUIS, WILSON I HAJ, FRIDON 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #706 GUIRGUIS, FAIZA F ESMKHANI, MOJTABA CLEARWATER FL 33767' 2513 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 701 10443 GREENDALE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 TAMPA FL 33626 - HANDLEY, ROBERT M HANNAH, HUGH H III HENNIGAN, MICHAEL G 1501 GULF BLVD #604 HANNAH, JAYNE F HENNIGAN, CHRISTINE A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2903 PO BOX 21281 2 OSBORN ST CHATTANOOGA TN 37424 - 0281 STONY POINT NY 10980 - HENSGEN, CAROL W HISER, RICHARD F THE HODGES, KEITH L 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1706 1500 BURKHOLDER DR 603-17 ROBINSON ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 ALPENA MI 49707 - 8165 HAMILTON ON L8P 1Y6 00030 - CANADA HOSP, UWE HOUSTEAU, RAYMOND F IBRAHIM, FAYEZ THE HOSP, INGEBORG A 3620 FAWN DR 2647 LAKE SHORE DR 140 KIMBALL BRIDGE COVE CANFIELD OH 44406 - 9578 NILES MI 49120 - 9513 ALPHARETTA GA 30022 - 4791 JACOB, MICAH M J Z M C CORP JASTRZEBSKI, LUBOMIR 415 CORONADO DR JACOB, MICHAEL B 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 5526 CABOT ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2531 PORTAGE MI 49002 - JIRKOVSKY, KARL K JURACKA, PATRICIA KALLINIKOS, LOUIS JIRKOVSKY, CHRISTIANE PRICE, JOSEPH T KALLINIKOS, KATINA 450 GULFVIEW BLVD S # 1004 9180 SOUTH RD # C 128 GRAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 PALOS HILLS IL 60465 - 2131 ETOBICOKE ON M8Y 2Z5 00030 - CANADA KAMBEROS, GEORGE G KAMBEROS, EUGENIA 10346 S LAPORTE AVE OAK LAWN IL 60453 - 4733 KENIG, EDWARD KENIG, STANISLAWA 433 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 KNUTSON, BARBARA F THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2525 KOPANAKIS, NICK- 35518 SCHOOLCRAFT ST LIVONIA M148150 - 1214 LANI, JOSEPH R LANI, CAROLE R 456 WILSON AVE STATEN ISLAND NY 10312 - 3730 LOCKART, HENRY C LOCKART, GLENDA K 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 LUPIENT, JAMES 750 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 - 1603 MAC QUARRIE, RONALD H THE MAC QUARRIE, JOANNE A THE 1400 GULF BLVD # 801 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2830 MALATY, KHAIRY A MALATY, EBTISAM K 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #901 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 •KARRAS, PAUL G KARRAS, CAROL M 2048 GOVERT DR SCHERERVILLE IN 46375 - 5125 KENNY, HARRY E TRUST KENNY, SHARON B TRUST 155 N HARBOR DR # 4012 CHICAGO IL 60601 - 7371 KOCALIS, ANTHONY J KOCALIS, IRENE A 722 KENT RD KENILWORTH IL 60043 - 1032 KUMP, PAUL H KUMP, CORINNE F 610 PRAIRIE ST NORTHFIELD MN 55057 KATSETOS, STEVE G 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 KIRKOWSKI, JOHN A KIRKOWSKI, EDWINAJ 134 E SHORE TRL SPARTA NJ 07871 - 2107 KONTRAS, STELLA B THE 4725 DIERKER RD COLUMBUS OH 43220 - 2942 LA POINTE, NORMAND J LA POINTE, LORRAINE J 450 GULFVIEW BLVD #301 -2624 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 LIMARDI, R J LIMARDI, LAURA 179 ANNADALE DR FAIRFIELD OH 45014 - 5226 LOMBARDO, JOSEPH LOMBARDO, JOANNE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 LYRAS, LOUIS G LYRAS, KARENA 80 CREED CR CAMPBELL OH 44405 - 1277 MAIR, ALOIS MAIR, DEBRA A 2903 APPIAN WAY EASTON PA 18040 - 7706 MALO, FOTIOS MALO, ALEXANDRA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 LISTES, MARINKO LISTES, NEDJELJKA 2895 CHICOUTIMI LAVAL QC H7E 1 B2 00030 - CANADA LUCARELLI, QUIRINO JR LUCARELLI, RACHEL 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 907 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2514 M S P A ACQUISITION II 1585 BROADWAY 37TH FLR NEW YORK NY 10036 - 8200 MAKAR, KYRI LLOS B MAKAR, ZEIZAF 1 669 TOMOKA DR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5856 MATUSZEK,THERESA PROCIUK, THEODORE 140 MANCHESTER DR # 210 BUFFALO GROVE IL 60089 - 2422 MC CAFFERY, MICHAEL G THE MC CLURE, JAMES J JR THE MC DONALD, VIVIAN A MC CAFFERY, MARGARET M THE PHELPS, K JEAN THE MC DONALD, BRENT E 46-1 REVERE RD 1 CALVIN CIR # C309 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1602 DREXEL HILL PA 19026 - 5328 EVANSTON IL 60201 - 1957 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 MC GEE JOHN P .MEAD, PAUL PO BOX 3455 MEAD, SANDRA CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 31 LINDROP ST 8455 LONDON SW6 2QU 00003 - GREAT BRITAIN MICHALENOICK, CHARLES J MILLER, ALAN H MICHALENOICK, CATHERINE D MILLER, MARY G SKYLINE TERRACE 1174 WAUKAZOO DR CLAREMONT NH 03743 HOLLAND MI 49424 - 2637 MORRILL, DANIEL MOUNAYER, JOSEPH MORRILL, SANDY 12 THORNTN DR 2029 W MANITOU DR DOLLARD DES ORMEAUX PQ H9B OWOSSO MI 48867 - 8727 1X8 00030- CANADA NATIONAL CONTRACTS INC NOVICK, CAROL A 11327 COUNTRYWAY BLVD 112 LITCHFIELD LN TAMPA FL 33626 - 2610 HOUSTON TX 77024 - 6016 ORMOND, BRIAN E ORN, DUANE L 1451 LINDENHURST DR 5415 BROOKLYN BLVD CENTERVILLE OH 45459 - 3328 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55429 - 3359 PALERMO, PAMELA J PANGERE, GEORGIANN M PALERMO, LOUIS M 13010 MONROE PL 1855 JESSICA RD CROWN POINT IN 46307 - 9588 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1508 PAPPAS, KELLIE PATSIS, STEVE 100 FLAX MILL RD PATSIS, EMANUEL BRANFORD CT 06405 - 2870 157 N ALLEGHANY AVE LINDENHURST NY 11757 - 4129 PENDLEY, CORBETT WAYNE PENNINGTON, JANICE THE PENDLEY, JANE 450 GULFVIEW BLVD # 501 464 ADAMS ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2522 DENVER CO 80206 - 4411 POLSTON, STEPHEN M PONTIKOS, IRENE POLSTON, JEAN M 193 COUNTRYSIDE DR 440 N GULFVIEW BLVD # 1701 BROADVIEW HTS OH 44147 - 3415 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - POZIOS, THOEFANIS PROKOP, MARILYN M POZIOS, KOULA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1006 825 MICHIGAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 MARYSVILLE MI 48040 - 1404 l? MICH, PATRICIA J 140 LN 570A LK JAMES FREMONT IN 46737 - MOORE, FRANCIS H MOORE, CLAIRE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 MUTLU, ULKER 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #908 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 O'NEIL, JOHN T THE 105 GRANVILLE CT NAPLES FL 34104 - 6759 PALASKY, JON R SR 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 PAPAGEORGIOU, DEMETRIOS G PAPAGEORGIOU, LIZA 5310 LONG MEADOW RD BLOOMFIELD HILL MI 48304 - 3660 PEARL, PENNY G 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 PIAZZA, LENO P ZORZIT, MARK J 443 ROWELL AVE SAULT ST MARIE ON P6C 51-3 00030 CANADA PORTER, CHARLES D PORTER, PATRICIA A 15411 OAKWOOD DR URBANDALE IA 50323 - PRYOR,CAROL 2346 ROSE GARDEN RD PITTSBURGH PA 15220 - 4029 QUERUBIN, KATHERINE RACHOWICZ, EDWARD 627 SAXONY BLVD RACHOWICZ, MAE ST PETERSBURG FL 33716 - 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1502N CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 REED, AUDREY L 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 ROPP, WALTER S 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1503N CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 SAAD, FATHY Z SHENODA, SAMIRA S 2626 DURANT OAKS DR VALRICO FL 33594 - 5932 SCHAAF, MICHAEL L MUDIE, AUDREY 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 SCHWALBE, MARTIN E SCHWALBE, GLENDA J 139 HAMILTON RIVER RD LABRADOR NL AOP 1 EO 00030 - CANADA SCICCHITANO, ANTHONY F SCICCHITANO, JANICE M 2701 ASTON AVE PLANT CITY FL 33566 - 9594 SEURYNCK, ELIZABETH THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 SNAPPY, WILLIAM A SNAPPY, PATRICIA L 109 CHENEY HILL LN RUTLAND VT 05701 - REESE, POLLY C PO BOX 400 MIDDLESBORO KY 40965 - 0400 RUCKNAGEL, MELBA A THE RUCKNAGEL FAMILY TRUST 8812 FOX PARK DR SAINT LOUIS MO 63126 - 2310 SANTOSTEFANO, ROBERT THE 14800 GREEN VIEW RD ORLAND PARK IL 60462 - 1994 SCHNEIDER, ROGER B SCHNEIDER, LYNETTE V 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #707 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 SCHWARTZ, JOHN 145 MARINA DEL RAY CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SCIMONE, PETER L SCIMONE, ROSALIE L 18555 ALEXANDER RD WALTON HILLS OH 44146 - 5351 SEYER CORP 80 MAIN ST MILLVILLE PA 17846 - SHAW, WILLIAM M SHAW, GEORGINA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1508 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 RAMASWAMY, ASHOK 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2525 RICKS, WALTER A SR THE RICKS, MILDRED H THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2514 RYAN-KOUDELKA, DEBORAH A 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2525 SAVOIE, NORMAN SAVOIE, ROSEMARIE OLD MOUNTAIN RD P O BOX 331 EASTHAMPTON MA 01027 - 0331 SCHULTE, CHARLES W SCHULTE, COLLEEN M 3723 LAKEWOOD SHORES DR HOWELL MI 48843 - 7889 SCIBA, ROBERT E SCIBA, JANE L 47647 PINE CREEK CT NORTHVILLE MI 48167 - 8527 SCOURTES, GEORGE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 SGOUPIS, JAMES SGOUPIS, ANNE 137 93RD ST BROOKLYN NY 11209 - 6201 SHELDAHL, ERIC A 3815 NW 109TH ST URBANDALE IA 50322 - 2022 SHERRY, BEATRICE SHIRSAT, SHAM S SIDKY, EMIL Y 828 WATER ST SHIRSAT, MADHAVI S SIDKY, SONYA M MEADVILLE PA 16335 - 3452 28 CAMBRIDGE DR 5451 S WOODLAWN AVE # 3 OAK BROOK IL 60523 - 1705 CHICAGO IL 60615 - 5209 OSIMMONS, EAN M SILVONEN, LINDAJ J SLEDZ, WILLIAM H 26501 S RIVER RD MC CULLOUGH, GARY S SLEDZ, SHARON R 857 SUNDANCE CIR 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 307 HARRISON TOWNSHIP MI 48045 - OSHAWA ON L1J 865 00030 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CANADA SMERLING, GEORGETTE SOBIESZCZYK, HARRY A JR SOFRONAS, JAMES 38 OLD DAIRY RD SOBIESZCZYK, BARBARA L SOFRONAS, CHRISTINE TRUMBULL CT 06611 - 4954 581 N 4TH AVE 431 GULFVIEW BLVD ADDISON IL 60101 - 2273 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 SOLIMAN FAMILY ENTERPRISES SOLU, EMINE F THE SORRENTINO, ROSA THE LLC SOLU, SULEYMAN S THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #505 7533 JOMEL DR 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 SPRING HILL FL 34607 - 2018 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2531 STACH, ISABELLE M STAMIS, CONSTANTINE STRAMAGLIA, JOHN 2134 ANDREWS CT STAMIS, ETHEL R STRAMAGLIA, JEANNINE L DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 4839 505 MANAWA TR 4025 GOSS MT PROSPECT IL 60056 - 3719 SCHILLER PARK IL 60176 - 1827 SUESS, BERNARD H SUMMER, CLAIRE D TRUST SUTHERLAND, JOHN J 1100 OLD POST RD 7635 EADS AVE # 106 SUTHERLAND, PEGGY E PERKASIE PA 18944 - 1582 LA JOLLA CA 92037 - 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 THOMAS, FRANKLIN J THOMAS, NABIL S TIDD, JAMES A THOMAS, JOYCE E THOMAS, SAMIA TIDD, VICKI A 8364 GOLDEN PRAIRIE DR 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 504 5861 ROGERS RD TAMPA FL 33647 - 3241 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - JAMESTOWN OH 45335 - 8713 TIDSWELL INC TIKRITI, GARY D THE TRAKAS, ANNA THE 419 CORONADO DR 2849 CHANCERY LN 1616 SHERIDAN RD # 10G CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1427 WILMETTE IL 60091 -1851 TRUHAN, JOSEPH G USHER, CEDRIC WARD, THOMAS G 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1007 USHER, SHEILA 2817 ROEHAMPTON CLOSE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 40 CASTLE AVE CLONTARF DUBLIN 3 00003 - TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 8426 IRELAND WECHSLER, RENATE THE WEEDEN, SAM W WEIS, JAY B 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1101 WEEDEN, BETTIE I WEIS,.ERIK J CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #703 2227 7TH ST NW CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 ROCHESTER MN 55901 - 0206 WERTH, KENNETH D WHITE, FREDERICK T WILLARD, GILLIAN M WERTH, PAMELA A WHITE, LINDA M 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #807 120 BARRINGTON CIR 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1806 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2514 ALPENA M149707 - 4101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2520 WOOLUM, KAYETTE 201 DEAN HILL DR PINEVILLE KY 40977 - YANTEK, MINERVA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1008 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 0WOOLUM, KERRY L WINKLER, DWIGHT L 528 KENTUCKY AVE PINEVILLE KY 40977 - 1343 YOWELL, KENNETH P YOWELL, CINDY W 132 ALBEMARLE DR PEN LLYN PA 19422 - 1127 ISWYROZEMSKI, WALTER WYROZEMSKI, MARY 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ZAMMIT, ALFRED G ZAMMIT, DAVID 1900 THE COLLEGE WAY # 1805 MISSISSAUGA ON L51- 5Y8 00030 - CANADA ZIELINSKI, DETLEF R ZIMMERMANN, GUNDER ZUGALJ, IVON J ZIELINSKI, MONIKA 12912 CASTLEMAINE DR ZUGALJ, MILKA 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #805 TAMPA FL 33626 - 4470 1044 E 165TH ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 SOUTH HOLLAND IL 60473 - 2573 0 0 AA ON CLEARWATER BEACH " 14 2005 1 7? ?Gt'j August 3, 2005 Clearwater Community Development Board c/o Clerk of the City of Clearwater 112 S.Osceola Ave. Clearwater FL, 33756 RE: Proposed Development at 430 S. Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater Beach Dear Members: The Board of Directors of this condominium, having met with the representatives of Taylor Woodrow Corp., would not be opposed to the development of the property formally known as the Adams Mark Resort. The information presented at the June 7, 2005 meeting was very professional and somewhat specific as to the architectural design and use of space. Our concurrence is based on the meeting presentation without any major design changes. In the event major design changes are anticipated, we would expect to be given another courtesy meeting. Respectfully, 440 WEST, Inc Fred T. Whi e, President Board of Directors FTW/ens cc: Clearwater Planning Department Clearwater City Council File 440 S. GULFVIEW BLVD. • SUITE 203 • CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 • 727-461-2885 • 727-442-1480 • FAX: 727442-6628 08/02/2005 01:56 7274437 CLEARWATER E H BEA CLW BEACH CHAMP ORIGINAL PAGE 02 ,I WWW.KA0KN"l L(QAI Promoting Clearwater and its Business Community. EXECUTIVE OFFIC RS Jack Heckert Lies Partners Lounge President Craig West Fifth Third Bank Vice Prexident Karen Donovan Treasure Island Casino Crux SeUrlary Rich vwlkclli vitraelli & Awmiatm inc. Treasurer MaryRia Curates Ebb Tideicmwt Past President CHAIRM ENID) R)ECTQR,S John Beaedic NeuviBion Ire. wet) 1VWAWnN t Valerie Gllgore Beach Gameland Membership David Little ReMax Action First Martin Cale Red Roof Inn (;ore»vrterNlao?urr James Lampatbakis lames Lampathakis. P.A. Spec. F.+eiv Rick AN* Clearwater Beach Gulfview Rosurt Paul Andrews Shepherd's Beach Resort Rosemarie Bonnlag"a Swisstieim Realty Joe Burdelte Congas Croup Kristi Cheatham Clearwater (ias System Ruth borer Chapel Ay The Sea Tornray Duff Tommy buffs lath Aviation Fub Michael Frangedis Flipperr. (lift Shop Gtorgette Gillis Viewpoint Realty Dario Knight Hilton Clearwater Beach Resort Aan Quinn SnowNke Inn Brian Roxemao Pubiix Supermarkets .Executive Director Sheila CVIe Tourism & Marketing August 2, 2005 Sent by facsimile to: 562-4865 Community Development Board City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, PL 33756 ?MM[li'?It? ? A G 0 2 200 u PLANNING & DE 1.,„ . `i7 SV%,S CITY OF Cl. x-... The Board of Directors of the Clearwater Beach Chamber was given a presentation this morning by representatives from Taylor Woodrow regarding their plans for the redevelopment of the Adams Mark property on Clearwater Beach. This included a condominium tower and a stand-alone boutique hotel, which would contain over seventy condo-hotel rooms. The condo tower itself would be 150 feet in height which is the same as the existing structure. After some discussion, our Board unanimously voted to support the project on behalf of the Beach Chamber. We believe that this project will greatly enhance the look of our beach community and bring much needed tourist accommodations to the area. Therefore, as its presidlent, I urge Staff to favorably recommend approval of Taylor Woodrowrs application and that the Board take favorable action at its August 16 meeting. We thank you for your consideration. SiAcmly, Jack Heckert, President Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce Cc: Michael Delk, City of Clearwater Development Review Staff INVESTING IN CLEA R WA TER'S TOURISM INDUSTRY P.Q. Box 3573 a Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 • (727) 447-7600 * Fax (727) 443-7812 * Toll Free 1-888-799-3199 TO: Jiffy From: Sherry Watkins, City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, Fl 562-4582 PICKUP: 1110 FLD2005-01016 715 S Gulfview Blvd - Please copy plans that have a yellow sticky on them. One copy of each. FLD2005-05047 430 Gulfview Blvd -Please copy plans that have a yellow sticky on them. One copy of each. Return originals to Sherry Watkins Planning Department City of Clearwater Call customer to pick up his copies Ed Hooper @ 458-4757 . Page 32 Beacon, December 8, 2005 Sem. Onty7 It's like living on minutes Vacation! from the beach!! AEVING ROOM f { 9'. C?{Fim t31 tY? mc4,w.q - BEDROOM2 r1. C4 Bk,o o1 - ? tory,wx.v - ) SF LACK WIC GREAT ROOM L.. ';.?'f, 7r U,rbv9 owNERSSUrrs ,rq,nme PA I _.. ....... _......... _. O Ci e.W IKA. b c ? Ri Monte Verde (2,129 sq. ft..Living) 2 Bedrooms • 2 Baths • Den r«4r4- Wi p??"? PA77D r,cys?w MC1,rbA rr -W. T BEDROOM t ,r40+??. M/003 CRMTROOM Y,.441wUb F4T. 9 9«q, r4an 1•M CrCfJQ?® '?'1 . Monte Villa (2,= sq. ft. Living) 2 Bedrooms • 2 Baths a Den on re AT LAKE S E M I N O L E Luxury Condominium Residences from the $320s Welcome to Monterey at Lake Seminole. This spectacular community of just 96 luxury condominium residences within three separate four-story buildings boast a great location. With so many reason to make Monterey your new home, please call or visit us today! Convenient to Shopping, Seminole Park, Lake Seminole and the Beaches • Easy Accessibility to Major Thoroughfares 9 Gated Access • Community Pool with Cabana and Fitness Room Preview Center Open Daily! Mon. - Sat. 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Sun. Noon to 6 p.m. 727-394-9670,o www.Pulte.com 10599 Lake Vista Drive, Seminole; FL 33772 Artist's Conception Oral representations cannot be relied upon as correctly stating the representations of the developer. For correct representations, reference should be made to the prospectus (offering circular), purchase Q agreement and documents required by section 718.503, Florida statutes, to be furnished by a developer to a buyer or lessee. CGC057906., r W December 8, 2005 Beacon Page 31 ro Adam's Mark Hotel Makes Way For Indigo Beach Residences ft CLEARWATER BEACH: The U.S. Tower Division of Taylor Woodrow, a developer of lux- ury condominium residences throughout Florida, unveiled a new name and a new theme for its newest luxury gulf front residences at the site of the former Adam's Mark Hotel on Clearwater Beach: Indigo Beach Residences. Taylor Woodrow recently demolished the Adam's Mark building with an impressive implosion. Tom Tosi, senior vice president of operations for the U.S. Tower Division of Taylor Woodrow, said the mixed. use development will include luxury tower condominium residences and a condomini- um-hotel, both with resort style amenities. A dramatic West Indies architectural theme has been selected for Indigo Beach.. Resi- dences. The theme fits perfectly with the elegant-but-casual envi- ronment for which Clearwater Beach is famous the world over. The project will provide an eye, catching, southern gateway to Clearwater Beach. Bob Glantz, VP of Sales and Marketing, said a West In- dies themed preview and sales center is slated to open in Feb- ruary 2006 and construction of Indigo Beach Residences is scheduled to commence sum- mer 2006. Tosi said Clearwater city officials played a big role in the project development plan. "We worked closely with Clearwater city officials to substantially im- prove and enhance the City's Beach 'Walk plan and retain. hotel accommodations here," said Tosi. Tosi added that Clearwater city officials deserve much of the credit for the dynamic scale of the development. "They de- serve a big share of the credit," he said, "for turning this from an aging hotel into what will be a dynamic design for Clearwa- ter Beach." The 15-story condominium tower will offer 112 two and three bedroom condominium residences priced from under $l. million to over $2 million that range from 2,000 square feet of living space to over 3,200 square feet. A wide variety of floor plans will be offered, and the interior features and ame- nities will be among the most luxurious in the Pinellas area, Glantz said. An I1-story hotel tower will offer 78 suites with luxur y appointments, features and finishes and sweeping views of Clearwater Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. Information on the hotel suites will be announced soon. Taylor Woodrow compa- nies have been building award- winning homes, high rise condo- miniums and lifestyle communi- Implosion of Adam's Mark Howl d Glantz said the amenities at Indigo Beach Residences will include a billiards room, fitness center, private theater, a library and a card room, asocial room. and a resort swimming pool and spa. For more information about Indigo Beach Residences, telephone toll free 1.8004463057 or visit www.indigobeach.com. _....,I 4 "1 v' TO BE PLACED ON OUR PRIORITY MAILING LIST, REGISTER AT WWW.INDIGOBEACH.COM 430 S Gulfview Blvd, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 (800) 446.3057 A6. inDIGO BEACH RESIDENCES ORAL REPRESENTATIONS CANNOT BE RELIED UPON AS CORRECTLY STATINE THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE DEVELOPER FOR CORRECT REPRESENTATIONS, REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO THE DOCUMEN-M REQUIRED BY SECTION 718.503, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO BE FURNISFI ED BY A DEVELOPER TO A BUYER OR LESSEE 1'0ybrVftXt W .110 ties in North America for over 65 years. Headquartered in Florida and England, current North American operations in- clude more than 80 active devel- opments throughout Florida, California, Arizona, Texas and Ontario, Canada. The com- pany's worldwide operations recorded revenues in excess of $5 billion in 2004. CLEA& ATE 4BACK, FLQRIDA V, A; wF C AM CAN COURIER EXPRESS TEL: (81]M-9700 FAX: (81-1W,-9518 www.americancourierexpress.com P.O. Box 21181 TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33622-1181 ` NO.?( MONTH DAY YEAR z 1 SHIPPER CONTACT RECIPIENT •. Cf / Tom' CONTACT C L c.J STREET SUITE/APT# STREET Id 17 SUTTE/APT# CITY STATE ZIP CODE CITY ef L ,ol STATE _ ZIP CODE REFERENCE/JOB# DRIVER NO. PIECES WEIGHT WAITINGTIME DECLARED VALUE ?J 3 3 ,I COD AMOUNT CHECK ONE DRIVER'S INITIALS DESCRIPTION ZONE CHARGE CHARGE CHECK CASH RECrEIVEh R GOOD RJR PER PRINT NAME TIME DEL. TOTAL CHARGE x ( CSC o?q ?-?S Taylor Woodrow Taylor Woodrow 877 Executive Center Drive West Michael Van Butsel Suite 205 Project Manager St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2472 U.S. Tower Division Tel 727.563.9882 Cell 727.244.6407 Fax 727.563.9674 michael.vanbutsel®us.taylorwoodrow.com www.taylorwoodrowhomes.com CU CHUCK JONES, AIA PRINCIPAL 1213 E. 6TH AVENUE YBOR CITY TAMPA, FLORIDA 33605 (813) 228.8000 FAX (813) 228-0770 chuck@cgharchitects.com www.cgharchitects.com J ! J J Taylor Woodrow Tim. A. Knight Project Manager U.S. Tower Division Dir 727.369.0634 Cell 941.650.9022 D.C. 158`25'4307 tim.knight@us.taylorwoodrow.com Taylor Woodrow 877 Executive Center Drive West Suite 205 St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2472 Tel 727.563.9882 Fax 727.563.9674 www.tayforwoodrowhomes.com ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT A tract of lend Consisting of Lots 33, 34 and 35 and pan of Lot 36 of LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereon(, m receded in Plat Book 13 pages 12 and 13 of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida and lands and submerged lands lying between and Southerly, Soulteratedy" Westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkhead line described in mild set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida Disclaimer No. 22310," recorded in O.R. Book 765, page 542, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, said tract being dmadbed as foll- Begin at an iron pin at the Northeast Corner of said Lot 33 and the West right-ofwlay margin of Gulf New Boulevard, Bald pant being the True Point of Beginning, said pint being the PC of a curve to the left having a radius of 847.00 feet and an arc distance of 235.76 feet; thence run along mid cum to the left and along the West right-of," margin of Gulf Nee Boulevard a chard bearing of South 20611"ig' East and a chard distance of 235.00 feet to an um pin; thence run Souk 68'55'27" Wert for a distance of 402.14 feel to an imn pin, add point bang the PCofa curve to the right hadrg a radius of 1247.00 feet and an am distance of 296.79 feel; thence nm along said cues to the right a chord bearing of North 19.OT51" West and a chord distance of 296.09 feel to an imn pin; thence run North 77'41'16' East for a distance of 400.00 feet to a pant and back to the Tres Pam of Beginning. Containing 106504.22 sq.IT or 245 acres more or lee Not": All fell measurements matched record dimensions (Vesthg Deed as recorded in O.R. Book 765, Page 542 on foie In the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.) within the precision requirements of ALTA/ACSM specifications. The property sham and described hereon is the s"re property " described in the TiBe Commbm"t No. 40186603FCIWX03-002170[NCS ofCommonWaalh Land Title Insurance Company bearing an afealw date OfOmober 16, 2003. NU I t5 1. ALL MATERIALS MID CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MORE STRINGENT TECHNICAL SPfCIFICADONS AS FOUND IN THE STANDAAO SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER OR THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS PREPARED BY FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS. INC. SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS PROJECT. 2. THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY FOR THIS PROECT Is THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. 3. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDIES ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN THEIR VICmmY, 4, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO PREVENT EROSION AND TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT MATERIAL TO INLETS. SURFACE DRAINS, TAKES AND WERAND AREAS. THE COMRACTOR SHALL USE STRAW BALES, SILT BARRIERS OR OTHER APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO MITCATE ADVERSE IMPACTS TO EXISRNG SURFACE WATER QUALITY. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTROL ALL FUGITIVE DUST ORIGINATWC ON THE PROJECT BY WATERING OR OTHER METHODS AS REQUIRED. 6. NO DEBRIS SHA4L BE ALLOAED TO ENTER THE EXISTING SANITARY AND STORM SYSTEMS. 7. ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ARCHITECTS- 8, 8ACRFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED BY THE CITY. S. LOCATIONS OF TRASH DUMPSTER TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF CLEARWATER 10. SHE LANDSCAPING WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECIION 3-1202 OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. ti. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE AE, BASE FLOOD ELEVATION - 12; ZONE M, BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS 14 AND 16 PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NOS 1210MO102G & 12103C01C4G, MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. 12. SITE UGHFNG SHALL BE PRONGED IN COMPUANCE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER CODE REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL BE DIRECTED DOWNWARD AND AWAY FROM AOMACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS. ADDITIONALLY, LIGHTING MLL BE DIRECTED AWAY MOM THE BEACH ZONE M CONFORMANCE WITH SEA TURTLE NESTING GUIDELINES PROMULGATED BY THE FLORIDA FISH d WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (FF&WGC)_ PLEASE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS BY PHIL GRAHAM AND ASSOCIATES. 13. DRAINAGE FOR All PARKING LEVELS UNDER THE BUILDING WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO ACCOMMODATE WATER OUAUTY REQUIREMENTS FOR ME PROJECT. 14, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF CONSTRUCITON PLAN SUBMITTAL 15, MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL FOR ME CONDOMINIUM SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ROLLING DEAF DUMPSIERS TO STAGING AREA ON COLLECTION DAYS. 16. BUILDING TO BE SPRINXLERED. 17. CONSTRUCTION PUNS TO SHOW FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION TO BE AT LEAST 15 FEET FROM THE BUILDING BN MTHIN 40 FEET OF A HYDRANT I fIVVLVI ILy4Yl DEVELOPER CIVIL ENGINEER TW / BEACH RESIDENCES - CLEARWATER, FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. LLC 3030 STARKEY BLVD. 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. NEW PORT PORT RICHEY, FL 34655 SUITE 205 PHONE: 727-724-8422 ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33702 FAX: 727-724-8606 PHONE: 727-369-0629 FAX: 727-563-9674 GILLETT ASSOCIATES ARDT GROUP INC. 1543 SECOND STREET SUITE 201 SARASOTA, FL 34236 PHONE: 941-957-4477 FAX:' 941-957-4151 la s LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PHIL GRAHAM AND COMPANY, P.A. 436 SECOND STREET NORTH ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33701 PHONE 727-821-5225 FAX: 826-1626 UCIYA71 I I I A9EJLL 217 Existing Hotel Rooms (available through request for termination of non- conformity) •78 Proposed overnight accommodation units hotel-condo 139 Existing hotel rooms available for conversion x I/ Conversion factor (30 residential dwelling units to 40 hotel rooms 104 Residential dwelling units available rounded down to 1 , 2 residential 2 residential dwelling units converted to proposed equivalent commercial space of 2,910 square featL.04 F.aR,) J 102 ?4 ResMenllal dwelling units requested to be transferred to the site 112 posed residential dwelling units CLEARWATER FLORIDA SITE PLAN SECTION 07, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 15 E - UINI I k-UUIN I LEVEL CONDO BIOG. HOTEL BLOC IS 14 5 13 6 12 6 II 8 ID 9 9 9 8 9 7 9 6 9 5 9 4 7 3 II 0 2 Q D I o D TOTAL I12 18 PREPARED FOR, TW / BEACH RESIDENCES CLEARWATER LLC 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. SUITE 205 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33702 TEL (727) 369.0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 PREPARED BYL o FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Siarkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 Tel, (727) 849-7588 - Fax. (727) 848-3648 E.B. No. 7421 SHEET 1 2 3-5 6 7.9 10 11.12 111, 13 WING INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION COVER SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND CSWPP PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN UTILITY PLAN PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS UTILITY DETAILS LAND USE DATA FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDRDS [21 EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED (MIN/MA%) REQUIRED (MIN/A4S) ZONING DISTRICT T (TOURIST) T (TOURIST) HOTEL T (TOURIST) CONDO T (TOURIST) OS/R (OPEN SPACE (RECREATION) OS/R (OPEN SPACE (RECREATION) USE HOTEL CONDO AND - - HOTEL-CONDO LOT AREA TOTAL 108,504 Sr TOTAL 106,504 SF 20000 SF 10,000 SF 2.45 AC 2.45 AC AREA ZONED TOURIST. T LANDWARD 81,450 SF LANDWARD 81,450 SF - - OF SEAWALL 187 AC OF SEAWALL 1.87 AC LOT MOTH 236' 236' IOU' 100' BUILDING COVERAGE (GROUND FLOOR) 32,729 SF 61,923 SF FAR 1.0 TAR 1.0 RETAIL 2,910 SF (FAR 0.04) IMPM.EABLE SURFACE RATIO 1.68 AC (90x) 1.57 AC (645) ASR 95% SR 955 73,157 SF 68,438 SF NUMBER OF UNITS 217 (HOTEL ROOMS) 190 UNITS [4,5] - 56 UNITS L6J DENSITY (SEE TABLE AT LEFT) 217 HOTEL ROOMS nl I6 U/AC UNITS 190 101.6 V/AC - MAX !0 U/IC SETBACKS PROPERTY LING 1.87 AC .87 AC SETBACKS (BUILDINGS) FROM (FIST) 28' 15' 0'-15' 0'-15' 9DE (NORM) 19' (TO CANOPY) 15' 0'-t0' 0'-1D' SIDE (SOUTH) 31' 15' 01-10' REAR (WEST) FROM SEAWALL 13' (TO BAR HUT) 20' O'-2O' 10'-20' SETBACKS (TO TOWERS) FRONT (FAST) 15' SDE (NORM) I3' 0'-10' 0'-10' SIDE (SOUTH) 2 Y 0'-10' REAR (WEST) FROM SEAWALL 21 ' 0'-20' 10-10' SETBACXS (OTTER STRUCTURES) FRONT (EAST) 1' 0' 0'-15' 0'-Y5' SIDE (NORTH) 2' 1' o'-10' 0'-40 SIDE (SOUTH) I' II' 0'-10' O'-10' REAR (WEST) FROM SEAWALL 0' 6' (TO SIDEWALK) 0'-20' 10'-20' SETBACKS FROM CCCL SIDE (NORM) 13 5' 20' 20' REAR (WEST) 1' (TO BAND SHELL) 8' 20' 20' HELM (1) 115.5' 149.5' [3) 150' 160' PAVED VEHICULAR AREAS 12.463 SF 2,692 SF PARKING Lot INTERIOR LANDSCAPING 4.105 SF 2a,I6 SF LOS 10% (SF AND X OF PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA) PARKNG 33% 106% COMBIxEO TOTAL 201 274 SPACES (8] 261 SPACES ()j -I HANDICAP (INCLUDED IN TOTAL NUMBER) 10 H/C ID H/C J H/C Ell HEIGHT IS ELEVATION ABM FEMA BASE ELEVATION •16•. [21 REQUIREMENTS ARE BASED ON FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (LEVEL 2). C33 SEE PUNS FOR HEIGHTS OF LOWER, PengNS OF BIIIIDINGS. N RA MUM U H -COND (441 l Wx nR1M NMB EA OF IAUIIS Is Ox00 11 CONDO c Do O R IGI NA L (SE (SEE OE NSlY 'ABLE AND UNIT COUNT AT LEI) C51 PLEASE REFER TO THE DENSITY TABLE FOR THE BREAKDOWN OF UNIT PROVENANCE [61 BASED W THE LAND AREA ZONED 1, TOURIST DISTRICT 171 PARKING REQUIREMENTS 78 HOTEL-CONDO UNITS (I SPACE PER UNIT) 78 112 CONDOS (1.5 SPACE PER UNIT) IM 2,910 SF RErAIL (5 SPACES PER IODOSF) 1-5- 261 SPACES eJ L L OT PARKRIG SPACES H/C PARYJNG SPACES NOTE, TWO (2) PROPOSED PARKING SPACES ARE OEOICATED TO TAXIS. DD 4 2 86 ] 3 88 3 \ roTU 274 IG JUL 11 2005 REV 7/08/05 Fit, 2W4-09M WING DEPART?ME(? OB No ssw 71 #-spi nr- III r: AQ1_9ATFR EPN 1209 n I Al A -U-LI L I A n CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING LTA 151Y Cl C2 4477.00 298.79' 296.09SI9'O7'51-E 1'ID'43' DE 00' 35.75' 235.00' N20-17'10-W(L) N 040'02' F IRS 2 Z7 '6r' I V 1" A TO BE REMOVED = EXISTING BUILDINI 4G -398 ?, ?T all 51AI. 'n f}E;ARWPr G sa?q,ois f T BULY,HEtfr DSCPwEO ?N fDA. N i NN0 7RV'TSi OF OF T HE tiN ,E OF l RuYOR!0A THE GiA; O DISCAER N0. 22310 0 OR 755, PG-542 T l? Y 0 q p6 R IV N 0 15 30 60 20' x 40 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS (SEE DETAIL SHEET 6) ORIGINAL RECOVED JUL 112LIG5 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OF CtEARWATER Y BY HARVEL & ASSOCIATES, INC., DATED 02/16/05 NFORMATION OBTAINED BY FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. PERMIT EXEMPTION N PROCESS FOR DEMOLITION WORK WATERWARD OF CCCL (BUT LAN DWARD OF SEAWALL) THROUGH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. " rvrt w ra w.wn PREP4RED FOP., SHEET DESCRIPTION, 699-271 7C o. INC FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS TW IBEACH RESmENCES-CLEARWATER,LLC. ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT 209 , . O 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. .,,..ro. 2 EP r .o"neoroco..-I ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 205 EXISTING CONDITIONS GG 30 5macY B-. N<. P"I R?,F,y FL 34655 30 Tee (727) 049-7588 Gar; (7271 948.3648 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33702 I 7108105 REVISED PER DRC COMMENTS ?r TEL (727) 369-0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 . v.o , 05123705 13 EM E.B. No. 7421 rv w t 1 __ CURVE TABLE -1 I CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD eEARwc OELTa BEACH WALK - - {•? ?? 421 S. GULFVIEW BLVD N Cl IF: 1247,00- .7' 19 P T MOTEL F 1 PARKING LOT ' 1 I I? C2 847.00' 1 76' 23N2017"O"MIL) N F 15 A' ' CITY OF CLEARWATER S" VV ? ? RED ROOF INN IAA' I CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. S? o CCU 1 S ?? I '1 o ro 20 40 5. /1 C 5 '` I EMERGENCY FIRE I - ACCESS `I F? I fh? (7-L,.ua J I I I II I II' . i .. . Jl 55 y. n C 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 EASING RETAINING WALL" Cq+ 1 I II I 1140 LF SILT FENCE t G5+ Y a 8 577'38'24 Conic 'w RAMP - - I I C O I II A96 { I I FOUNTAIN IIn I 1 'C RAMP C CR20 G TI 11. RRR S ?E RN@'W p Q y" I IRO ROO Z; ZQ E, h-k!I 6F s-j 3° ° IIl ),1 431 S. GULFVIEW BLVD RETAIL W/APTS ABOVE SOFRONAS, CHRISTINE, SOFRONAS, JAMES A.78 nY ITYPE CR20 q01 'y,l lb. Iq i ! I ', I C r, M . M/C RAMP A I 1 ? 1'11, 1 r TYPE CR20 ' z O ' 0 1. ?5 A ,A 5 C ?? 1 {G " 4 5,yT' DCV?\ .5 , 1 ` N `` 1, it ?' ai 9? ??- 14 Eo fp HdD?N ° sue' r i. a`°? 1 1 I? _ - o 11 5 -? ?? n•?r-++i" d; TOP5,95 1, 65?a 11 ?.y4 15• 1F 5W 5?6Tti T ° W0?0FEl?ye`VVT N-RIM=75115"PVC ENE DEVELOPER IS yi c b `ti' 1G. SE-3.45 15" PVC AaiPONSIOUr TRASH 1 a "5M '(F) 318.34 IE NW"3y ?.? SIGHT TRIANGLE 1 tiP 1 H/C PE RAMP TYPE CR20 TY LEGEND = 1ST FLOOR OUTLINE SO - SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED - TOWER OUTUNE (FLOOR 4 AND UP) = OUTDOOR RETAIL SPECIALTY PAVEMENT - - - - - - - - - - = H/C ACCESSIBLE PATHS 437 S. GULFVIEW BLVD RETAIL W/APTS ABOVE FRANGELIS, MICHAEL FRANGELIS, JOAN, TRUSTEE R986 JUL 111005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT R 445 S. GULFVIMLV-0 CLEAR A WTE CONDOMINIUMS PELICAN POINTE ON CLEARWATER BEACH CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC. -':-.t F) 402• ,y? " l Ep ti." „ T I N6g52? ,1 NT T i TOTAL PARKING SPACES 100 1 440 S. GULFVIEW BLVD - STANDARD 96 -cca 6B6 CONI ?'MINIUMS NOTE: ' HANDICAP = 4 1 P FOUR FORTY Wt DT ASSOCIATION, INC. T VERTICAL CLEAR HEIGHT OF PARKING GARAGE MUST BE 8 -r. IN FORMANCE WITH ABA G IDEUNES O 1 58 N C U PARKING LEVEL 1 tl *L` 6? 2. CONSTRUCT HEADER CURB AT DRIVEWAYS TO PROTECT LANDSCAPING AND TRANSITION TO DROP CURB AT SIDEWALK. NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION, 7; 699-271 oG INC FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS TW f BEACH RESIDENCES -CLEARWATER LLC. ADAMS MAR HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT "209 ..w , . a 677 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. K 7 3 EP w.v o < 1-1 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 205 "ED OC o „ . 3o sm,Ne> a"'758.8 N>. Pen Rio, FL 24651 TX(127)809- Fo„ (721) 846.3640 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33702 SITE PLAN 1 7/08/05 REVISED PER DRC COMMENTS ,,,E TEL (727) 369-0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 1 , 05!23105 13 EM E.B. No. 7421 .? M . a E h° Ik r 1 1 Ii 11 1 'ti. oE; y'b 531 <3Y 5t I7. E5 6. _ - - - ---------------------- -- _ ----------- - - -- - = ----- - 0,9 a R 9 R P A 1 1 ? 11 b ''I C nP ? 1 Q'i ? 1 I ? ?) ? I a Pr z 0 % 111 1) 111 t 4 ?? 1?1 a i7. :A-iz' x 111 ? ? ? ?? 11? Ay,(°•l"J" ""' ?q" a? IE ?? 9557 6?9C 1 ? ? c? I A NE.3.85' 1 0 E e5,,5 o} 1 f6N?` ?? e ZION 7.55 „ pVC ti? 6g6 6 W tiA L. SG ?Ae 115' p1j6 A ha4 -_ :11 - .D. IE NW. 5Vy 5S 1 W 1, 1i1 I? 1 `CCLI x505 l ,55a .? 1 ' n9 1. N 0 10 ZO b ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 111005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CI1Y OF CLEARWATER I. 2ND BOOR OUTLINE TOTAL PARKING SPACES '• Be - STANDARD 83 HANDICAP 3 _ PARKING LEVEL 2 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL PREP411D FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION iO°Y0' M CLEARW LLC ER W /BEACH RESIDENCES 699-271 oD e INC FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS . - , T AT ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT `Zoe EP , . O SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS ENGINEERS ENVIRONMENTALISTS e77 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. ,a ? 4 ,a e . o.I , , R 34655 SUITE 205 ORI SITE PLAN ? 3030 S-kly 8ma, Ne. Patl Rill,, rei, 10zz1 e48TSea v„pzTl a+eaG4s ST, PETERSBURG, FL DA 33702 674 FAX (7 1 7/08/05 REVISED PER DRO COMMENTS 27) 563.9 TEL (727) 369-0629 05123105 13 EM E.B. No. 7421 a O C Z Nq6 Ij . I 1 1 I I Y G a ? , r Iy , RO NV= 2 II N I V- a0 ? I 1 ? a O 111' ' G l 11 1, 1? ? 11 1 11 ? 1 ? •I Q , ? n A k A F h0b 11,'? ? t 1 ? MM ?3 q, 1 ?t r ?a?aN ?1 h? ,h2 59 . `51ti 1 I l' I i I N 0 IO 20 40 x y y5 1 5 _. ' I 1 ?`? cone S /w ? 9 6 I ------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- --- -------------- O I' U' B ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5' s I ...?JJJiiII{«1I,,,VVVyyyl ORIGINAL I 67f e ? i 5 4 A ?, I ?? { ' lil (... , I?I? rlir I I o ? •3 , I ` ? ? M?,?)1'6? .466 ? J d ? ? 111+ 11 . 5 1? AIL 4 f I I d'L ?. o ? ?II ON)iz RECEIVED .I. p. 1 J ?- _ _ ,r beer ? ; ?? ? r ?1UL 11206 If A 1I 1 I 1 LI 1 ? I UNIT 4. e' ,?°, • 5?`.fi m s7DR4DE , ', ?? PLANNING DEPARTMENT Rl>n° 4?fJ? 1 i CITY OF CLEARWATER r I.I. ?- LW ^?g 12015 'V11 T' j? ( 11 ?, I ..I PI II J _ 1 IvM ?19b I 0.F 'ryrI y 1 .H1 ? I 1 I? 1i _ I 1 J?? T'sG S Ip % ,I 1 c?l y? 1 YI f 111 y? 1y ?i Q i 1 11 511 IICI 3RD FLOOR OUTLINE 01 . t, 1111 11 j j` ? ?? ':'?x':.4?- ? "? W?pS '+• ` '? v t11 `I 1 II 1 12, 12' ? 1?1 ,? TO(=595 Il 1 1. - L I° `, 69.1 s )E SW 587 P- ne -_ J6. ?s? 4 15 VO a8 0 1 _ N?LI? g1 ?( Ic hdE=b. J6?h Fr A al - 6 v ?? ??. 6 -0' 13 v?00 1 _ 1^ 6' s2= IE T. 15 ?VC 5 rt e° -?1 In? 119.696 IE N,?5.A.7 1e , v? 1 2 -7 11 10 1 ` TOTAL PARKING SPACES 88 lHANDICAP • 3 l ?-000L , 6967 D PARKING LEVEL 3 1 .6 x6? NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL ?g 1 1 PREPARED FCR- SHEET DESCRIPTION, 699-271 DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. Tw eEncx RESIDENCES -creAxwArER PLC. j? , 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT 209 FLORIDA 5 '^Y EP ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 205 ) t0 x0Pi10 ?° EOMYf 3030 sm.w°YY elm, N°. P°n Ri-y EL 34655 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33702 SITE PLAN 1 7/o8/o5 REeso PER oec couuENrs OC Tel, (727) 899-7589 -Fax, (727) 848-3648 °?'E TEL (727( 369-0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 05!23105 13 EM E.B. No. 7421 - E i i 3 1. SITE DESCRIPTION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A NEW CONDOMINIUM S CONDOMINIUM/HOTEL COMPLEX, INCLUDING APPROXIMATLY 3,000 SF. OF RETAIL. LOCATED IN CLEARWATER, FLORIDA. CONSTRUCTION WILL CONSIST OF CLEARING, GRUBBING, EARTHWORK, INSTALLATION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE, BACK FIRING, PAVING AND GRADING. B. MAJOR SOIL DISTURBING ACT VIVES: SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES FOR THIS PROJECT WILL INCLUDE CLEARING. GRUBBING, EARTHWORK, INSTALLATION OF PAVING, DRAINAGE, WATER 6 SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE CEASED, BUT IN NO CASE SHALL THE TIME BE GREATER THAN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS, C. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 1,87 ACRES THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONDOMINIUM S CONDOMINIUMI HOTEL COMPLEX INCLUDING CLEARING AND GRUBBING, EARTHWORK, ORAINAGEA)TILITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND PAVEMENT. 0. TOTAL AREA TO BE DISTURBED 1ATACRES IT SHALL BE THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE THE ACREAGES OF DISTURBED SOIL IN THE PROJECT AREA AT ALL TIMES. E. (1) RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS BEFORE CW(B), DINING CW(D) AND AFTER CW(A) CONSTRUCTION: RUNOFF COEFFICIENT FOR OPEN SPACE: C =0.20 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE S: C=0.05 DISTURBED AREAS, EXPOSED SOIL ETC. DURING CONST.: C=0.40 WEIGHTED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT: CW(B): MD): CWMA): DESCRIPTION OF SOIL OR QUALITY OF DISCHARGE THE PINELLAS COUNTY SOIL SURVEY IDENTIFIES THE SURROUNDING SOILS AS. 2. CONTROLS NARRATIVE- SEQUENCE OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTROLS: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES - GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON THIS PROJECT CONSIST OF CLEARING, GRUBBING, EARTHWORK, INSTALLATION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE, BACK FILLING AND GRADING. ALL ITEMS REPRESENTED IN THE FOLLOWNG DISCUSSION ARE TREATED IN DETAIL IN THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWNGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, "FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION', OR WILL BE IMPLEMENTED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE IN A MANNER APPROPRIATE TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR W UL BE REQUIRED TO PREPARE A SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL PLAN. THE CONTACTOR WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED TO MODIFY THE PLAN OR MATERIALS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO ADAPT TO SEASONAL VARIATIONS. OFF-SITE RUNOFF SHOULD BE DIVERTED AWAY OR THROUGH THE CONSTRUCTION AREA THIS ADDITIONAL FLOW IF NOT DIVERTED, CAN ADD VOLUME AND SIZE TO STRUCTURAL PRACTICES, REQUIRING MORE FREQUENT MAINTENANCE AND LIMITING EFFECTIVENESS OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS. COMPLIANCE WITH THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PROJECT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS CONSTRUCTION-RELATED INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT BUT NOT SPECIFICALLY INDICATED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN CAN BE FOUND IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR VALE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FOR VEHICLES ENTERING OR EXITING ONTO PUBLIC ROADS THE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING THE SYSTEM AND MODIFYING THE SYSTEM OR PROCEDURES AS NEEDED. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A DETAILED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE TO INDICATE DATES OF MAJOR GRADING ACDVITIES AND DETERMINE SEQUENCING OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY PHASE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ITEMS AS DESCRIBED ON SHEETS 7 OF 131N THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWNGS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING SEEDING, MULCHING AND WATER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY CEASED BUT IN NO CASE SHALL THE TIME BE GREATER THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS INSTALLATION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND EARTHWORK AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS MAY REQUIRE DEWATERING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCHARGING THE DEWATERING FLOW TO A TEMPORARY SETTLING BASIN SUCH AS AREAS CREATED BY STAKED HAY BALES OR SILT FENCE IN DRY GRASSED SWALES OR OTHER SIMILAR SETTLING AREAS, HOWEVER, AT NO TIME SHALL THE CONTRACTOR DISCHARGE DEWATERING FLOW DIRECTLY TO WrE71AND AREAS. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND MAY BE REMOVED ONLY AMEN PERMANENT STABILIZATION IS ESTABLISHED AND THE OWNER APPROVES THE REMOVAL. A. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS: (1) STABILIZATION PRACTICES TO BE IMPLEMENTED STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE IN PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED, BUT IN NO CASE SHALL THE TIME BE GREATER THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED OR SODDED FOLLOVNG CONSTRUCTION. PGA LENG SJR??OPO M10.po' S 0M ON PLAN ?P?OrL55 P r> r ADD STONE BERM SPEED 6" MINIMUM-/ BUMP TO SHAKE OFF EXCESS USE FOOT DIRT ON TRUCKS A 357 ROCK GEOTEXTILE UNDERUNER TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS N.T.S. (2) STRUCTURAL PRACTICES WEE INCLUDE: ROCK BEDDING AT CONSTRUCTION EXIT STAKED SILT FENCES INLET SEDIMENT TRAP CURB INLET SEDIMENT BARRIER B. OTHER CONTROLS: (I) WASTE DISPOSAL: THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE UTTER CONTROL. AND COLLECTION WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES DARING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ALL FERTILIZER HYDROCARBON, OR OTHER CHEMICAL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR ACCORDING TO EPA'S STANDARD PRACTICES AS DETAILED BY THE MANUFACTURER NO SOLID MATERIALS INCLUDING BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SHALL BE DISCHARGED TO WETLANDS OR BURIED ON-SITE. (2) OFF-SITE VEHICLE TRACKING: OFF-SITE VEHICLE TRACKING W LL BE CONTROLLED BY THE FOLLOWING METHODS: LOADED HAIL TRUCKS TO BE COVERED WITH TARPAULIN. EXCESS DIRT ON ROAD REMOVED DAILY. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE THE CONTRACTOR SWILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTING AND MAINTAINING STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WHEN ENTERING OR EXITING ONTO PUBLIC ROAD. THE CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MODIFYING THE SYSTEM OR PROCEDURES AS NEEDED AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER 13) SANITARY WASTE: ALL SANITARY WASTE WILL BE COLLECTED FROM PORTABLE UNITS BYA LICENSED SANITARY WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED BY STATE REGULATION. (4) FERTILIZERS AND PESTICIDES: FERTILIZERS AND $01L STERILIZERS WILL BE USED ON THIS PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR WITH COORDINATION OF THE OWNER (8) NONSTORMWATER DISCHARGE (INCLUDING SPILL REPORTING): A. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE THE APPLICANT WITH AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN THAT HALL INCLUDE SPILL REPORTING AND RESPONSE. B. APPROVED STATE, LOCAL PLANS, ORSTORMWATI9R PERMITS: SWFWMD CITY OF CLEARWATER 3. MAINTENANCE: GENERAL THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AND REMOVAL OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR REQUIRED FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF PAY ITEMS FOR THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN RAIN GAUGES ON THE PROJECT SITE AND RECORD WEEKLY RAINFALL. ALL CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE MAINTAINED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR. ALLMEASURES WILL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD WORKING ORDER IF A REPAIR IS NECESSARY, IT WILL BE INITIATED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF REPORT. STRUCTURAL PRACTICES AND CONTROLS: THE FOLLOWING PRACTICES WILL BE USED TO MAINTAIN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS: BUILT-UP SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM SILT FENCE WHEN IT HAS REACHED ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING WILL BE INSPECTED FOR BARE SPOTS WASHOUTS, AND HEALTHY GROWTH. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE MAINTANED TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF ROCK BEDDING VMICH MAY IMPEDE THE USEFULNESS OF THE STRUCTURE. A INSPECTION: THE CONTRACTOR'S DAILY INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE PAY ITEMS FOR THIS PROJECT. ALL EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT AND CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE THE STANDARD CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT FORM FOR DAILY INSPECTIONS. S. TRACKING AND REPORTING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WEEKLY REPORT TO THE APPLICANT DOCUMENTING THE DAILY INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS TO THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES. THE PERMITTEE OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES SHALL MAINTAIN ALL REQUIRED RECORDS SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND COMPLETE ALL CSWMP INSPECTION REPORT FORMS REQUIRED FOR THE NPDES PERMIT. PREPARATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S WEEKLY REPORTS OF INSPECTIONS, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS, REQUIRED FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION, SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE PAY ITEMS FOR THIS PROJECT. IT I MAY ?II SIRE 28" III LOPE I Exp, IN. III TYPE III _J uL u STORM GRAIN TOE FABRIC IN STRUCTURE 6" MINIMUM SECnON 6' MINIMUM 13 2.4' CROSSBRACE \ SS TORM DRAIN UG' / _:: 'TRo UflE r' 6' MINI UM Y/_\\' I T K/RA POST INSTALLATION: -"- -- TYPE III SILT FENCE SUPPORTED BY STEEL POST SHALL BE USED. THE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED EVENLY AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE INLET A MAXIMUM OF 3 FEET APART, AND SECURELY DRIVEN INTO THE GROUND. APPROXIMATELY 18 INCHES DEEP. THE FABRIC SHALL BE ENTRENCHED 12 INCHES AND BACKFILLED WITH CRUSHED STONE OR COMPACTED SOIL. FABRIC AND WRE SHALL BE SECURELY FASTENED TO THE POST, AND FABRIC ENDS MUST BE OVERLAPPED A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OR WRAPPED TOGETHER AROUND A POST TO PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS FABRIC BARRIER AROUND THE INLET. MAINTENANCE. THE TRAP SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY AND AFTER EACH RAIN AND REPAIRS MADE AS NEEDED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED TO ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE TRAP. SEDIMENT SHALL NOT BE WASHED INTO THE INLET. IT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SEDIMENT TRAP AND DISPOSED OF AND STABILIZED SO THAT IT WILL NOT ENTER THE INLET, AGAIN. INLET SEDIMENT TRAP FILTER FABRIC WITH SUPPORTING FRAME N.T.S. I s'wL s'm/a ENDWALLS SOD DETAIL AT STRUCTURES GENERAL SODDING NOTES ?r NOTES wMtr 7. SPECIAL ATIEkf IS TO LK OWN TO THE PLACFMCNT OF SOD NEXT TO THE ROADWAY TOP OF SCO SHALL MATCH DXS OF VALLEY CURB. SOD DETAIL AT PAV'T EDGE -See FD.O. T. rI- NPs.. 100 105, 272, 27J. 281, and City of Cl--o, --R, m D.R.A.'I la 0d1ill-I deMde. -AIL --ld aeoe al an ex-9 P.bllo light of way shall rev M sodding. -All ne. roadways Na111-1l fodding, 16" wide along the wily curb edges Pe a mHrnwn. -All drolna9e elrveiur<e "I" r<4olve eoddlnq Per the ooove I a minimum. -All "- 4:1 CA e"1--111-1e sdadmg. -AIL loo an Sryef egYal 10 a It"Rer Mon 4 to 11-i be Pegged v mat seared w neeevgry to Prevent ok I'lgeement uNese metaled br me Cou?ry. -AU olba eielurbed areae Nor recaivMg sod ehoU be D,.PVly eeaed 0nd mokhed. -SOdd6g shgfi Inalade mi Work, fa,lllpen. and --t q -Moo, to ProdP<e a dense, IIm stand or gos:. -SoddrtN wIM be anerdaed ....P-11 11 809 of ITe Inelallollon ie heollby of the begmmg one end of the IS -It, main Nngn<e Pmiae SODDING DETAIL NTS OPTIONAL POST POSITIONS _-PRINCIPAL POST POSITION (CANTED 20' TOWARD FLOW) -FILTER FABRIC SILT FLOW SECTION POST (OPTIONS; 2'. 4" EE 2 6' MAX. 1 7/2" MIN. OIL. W000: STEEL I 1 1.33 LSS/FT MIN.) I 1 FILTER FABRIC (IN CONFORMANCE WITH SEC. 985 FOOT SPEC.) rc I ? o ? TYPE III SILT FENCE O.O.T. INDEX #102 N.T.S. MAINTENANCE OF SILT SCREENS: SILT SCREENS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT FOR SIGNS OF DETERIORATION OR FAILURE. DETERIORATION OF A SILT SCREEN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO MEAN THAT THE SILT SCREEN HAS LIMITED EFFECTIVENESS OR CAPACITY FOR THE FUNCTION OF TRAPPING SEDIMENT, DUE TO PROBLEMS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EXCESSIVE BUILDUP 0f' SEDIMENT OR CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT. WHEN A SILT SCREEN 13ECOMES DETERIORATED, IT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMEOIEO BY THE CONTRACTOR BY SJCN MEANS AS REMOVAL OF THE EXCESSIVE BUILDUP OF SILT, STRAIGHTENING AND TIGHTENING OF THE SCREEN, OR ANY OTHER SUCH MEASURE DEEMED NECESSARY. FAILURE OF A SILT SCREEN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO MEAN THAT THE SILT SCREEN IS NO LONGER CAPABLE OF FUNCTIONING TO TRAP SEDIMENT DUE TO A RIP, TEAR, OVERTOPPING BY SEDIMENT, BIODEGRADATION, CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT, OR ANY OTHER SUCH MEANS. WHEN A SILT SCREEN HAS FAILED, IT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPLACED WITH NEW SILT SCREEN BY THE CONTRACTOR W714IN THE LIMITS OF FAILURE. PREVENTATI VE MAINTENANCE OF THE SLIT SCREEN SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY WEEKLY INSPECTION FOR SIGNS OF DETERIORATION OR FAILURE DURING PERIODS OF NO RAINFALL EVENT. RECHVEID Jl "1 11 2005 PIANNINGDEPARTMENT SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAG`M,E T?% CjEApW R CONSTRUCTION SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN(CSWMP) 1. THE CSWMP CONSISTS OF PLAN SHEETS a AND 7 OF 13 SHOWING EROSION PROTECTION DEVICES TO BE UTILIZED ON THE PROJECT. TOGETHER WITH EROSION PROTECTION DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. 2. THE APPLICANTIOWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT HAS RENEWED THE CSWMP AND HAS SIGNED THE CSWMP WHERE REQUIRED BELOW. 3. THE CSWMP SHALL BE PART OF THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PERMITTED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. SIGNATURE: NAME'. DATE ?APPLICANT DOWNER ?AUTHORIZED AGENT PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION. "" a mot TW / BEACH RESIDENCES"CLEARWATER, LLC. Ms9-271 FLORIDADESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT 209 6 acaEP ea„lmlacawre ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 205 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION .m cWC d 3030 SIRrk, Blvd, New Perl Rlabey FL 34655 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33702 Ot Td: (7271 849-7588 - Fa:. 1727) 646a6Ae TEL (727) 369-0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 PLAN AND CSWMP 1 7/08/05 REVISED PER DAC COMMENTS Hers, ?? EM E.B. No. 7421 .1 r.P 05123105 a 13 Mir- ORIGINAL 552' g, 1 i A, 0 10 io 40 .51 I ??._ \\?? 1 I I 11 I ?. 'WG I _ I 1 1111?'.?. _?__ fOOAM MH l _ 9 1 ' /O • Pr.P.sed St- Sewer 5 1[•279 (5 n - y.s,d M.nh Ne Pr. ti A I I _ __ Mxarrg I ? ? , I ntt-ture Number - F66g5n 6 n' CCLL 5 y 1 a Y t P .DOSed MA ..Silt Fe a L n ------------ (A .G. a -- ?.... veN.rd a I.BO 1761E 18 RCP QQ.213-- 1 ,4.., II a 0 D.n.ge Fl.. D',e<ton ? -- - -- -? I O 11'1(??? I ?--?- - Conc.nlr.iM Dr.irgge floe Ocecllon ® ( I I7 1 - II i i?+? i a . Hard Sorfoce Dramge Flow Drecllon Propwed Spot EI-ti- 1 Ev sl ng Spot Elewt on L_ I .II? y 4 ilI I I, I ?? Q ° Exdt ng T- T. Be Removed A 1 rY 1 1 1 - 8' PVC r Floor Omn and Grata Elevot on V, P - E%ISIING IST FLOOR OUTLINE F, v/ MATCH IAA M. ?!? I GO tw? 7,7 a 1 f i?as? ?, III 1 I a LOEBP p GLAND., tlF"r e 7 ?:d'tid , REAS.. ? ? 2 N ' „EVnaA1oP• L ? - , 1', ?????'??' L-RIM-- 0 4° IPOP 1 ?I _r?1 ? )v I 4? N .s. ,Faso. L NFV_'2 6 IRO , I ;8 i' , ? ? ? T ,'? rB J I - 5='ac I I??t r" 1 1( p ?I .,. „I? -Llf? REMOVE 69 LF OF-- ?Y? NEE 1 I? ll ` u EIOSPNG CURB AND 'll ALL DRAIN COVERS AND GRATES IN DRIVE AISLES MUST MEET THE I , i I _ I. ( I 1 I ?1 L? REPLARCE WITH VALLEY AEOUTAEMENTS OF HS-20 SPECIFICATIONS. 0. 11 L? '??? Iy, ? ` _ -'? Ilt` I >)NJEPCA L Z OF f ? ??? \ _ ,\?f, ,` Gl17rE '6 1(1 , ?1V., ; 1 1 1 N I. 1?'-1 9 U "'l (5 C ? E -?i/? rr t ?" Ing MATCH E.S11NC I ; II II 1, CI ._ ' ynq _ ., 89 •', •e 11 ,I ?'? Y N' I ;II { TIRE t ' SEE SHEET 2 FOR I I 1 ?I jl h ?C Ni FEiNL t TEMPORARY 'IW? 1 o`.o? t -T- 1coNSCETION fn mnNCE G t ?I ?EN . I s }? .. Ian' ` 1 GRAY IRA. ?" R ECEIVED i ? - I d ?? ?9a II /' ? LO `? I a , MATCH E%ISTNG Lon, x JUL 11 2005 j' V n't REMOVE 90 LF a EXIST.,; CURB AND REPLACE WITH VALLEY, , CUTTER PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I I. l TRASH STAGING d 2 Pr,1A II .? Y 4L Tc AREA/LOADING n ZONE k j *' 02 I ( TtASII HCLD N?' D r 6 MATCH EXIISTNG V°x 1 1 H ® 1 , I 1 t sr; ?., u 1 3 DATUM NOTE I ?, V? a?M OS e 1 ?1 PROJECT DATUM 6 NAVO 1988 WITH AN ADJUSTMENT OF (-) 086 FROM 1 4Qo ?r Tr v JP I,. J.?n1 1 ??? NGW 1529 d? I I (u? `"' I NOTE: THE FE FIRM MAPS OU N4VO 1988 USES AN ADJUSTMENT OF 0.88 COUNTfWIDE PI 1 g5 }6 `1 THESE A U tS COUNTY) b sTMENTSTNENTS MUST BE H¢vr IN MIND WHEN OBTAINING VERTICAL y 11 (,' 1 ,l•?II° •??,"J.4 P=S 7. THESE A?uu 1 I IS ` 1 SIN- 8B, INFORMATION FROM OTHER SOURCES, .W1 ° 1 W0?0 FENCF> 1We A 5? 15 FVC IE NC"` e ?Y5 `? nP`>t9 ??? lENW3N4k715' PVC 1aW0.t eA ?. 1 1 ' CCCL a 6g6 1 65a PARKING LEVEL 1 19 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL PAEPAAEO fOA, SHEET OESCAIPT10% SOB X°' 699-271 ?e?0c TW /BEACH RESIDENCES • CLEARWATER,ILC. 209 i.1I FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 677 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT 7 ~EP T_T re ea.ee r ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS SUITE 205 +ro, 3030 S"k , B-,N4e Pon RHhey FL 34685 ST, PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33702 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN ntt Oc Tel, (727) 849-7588 - Fov, 1727) 6483648 1 7 5 REVISED PER ORC COMMENTS w TEL (727) 369.0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 EM E.B. No. 7421 ,r n 05123105 a< 13 g$ 5 E 6 3 ffi I ? ?f l . ll? lI ?? II I ? t?ns?ll' I?'l I ;? yN ? ? III r-' y2 - 1 I .. I C-Es i I ?`?-- 5 wnc s7 vw ?y?? g?rvPll I g' C'b r, 66 d, a. a" - o,v - - ------ ------------------ rll' c I? I 1 I Uu173 ? ? ?I. 11 19 ?, 9 ;LN1TB UNI ?,. Aad+.'? 6 `?I -..q?-S -- 1 _ 4? IP ,II IIII.` III II iti? Ir ` 0 ? II ? ? !I t f^ ^?' T ?m?/,? +??j? - ????? L ?_Y''; ?.I O • ?? ?W T TI 11, 1? II . t r ? ., m 1 _. 1/?.} .I O STORAGE 11 - I I 2`M=5?7 IRQ ?I I N?N?2 4a 4 )ReN 4 °9 ?? 1 I I I ' I "_Q f 8 I' ' G . M1 f,2 29 S.. IRO' r; I It II I .,? I ;: II 11 I b ;_ ?i:%;! /•'' II .r I?F s-s !'1?? 111 `II ?a ?1 u I'I ? ItrT_? ?I l? rn II ? uti?e; O ?. r ` I X114' ' F 111 I? _ << I? 'l Ir 1? - II.. IiT .4 I <''11 ' I 1 ? -::"(' ? -? ? Lceev, , l? '.I al?.. II ?I 1?? ?' ? ? r ; .Ir .il ?•1' 1 ? 1? ?I 's -G=P? II 1 111y? ?I , 1,1 o e t \ LG Y' 1 7. :,ke .`?p5 I 5.. , E7 11 y'v I ? I r- N ORIGINAL o 10 20 40 ® Il LEGE t® ls ND ?JI = Propase0 Storm Server . = Proposed G,,te lalel 10 = Proposed Storm Structure Number ...... .......«.. Proposed Sit Pence +?. • • .,.v + • ._+ FEMA Flood Z.P. Li- - Overland D,.Moge Flow Dlr.ou- ?-sV- C--trated Dro aoge Flow Direglm ?- = Mare Smkce Dro Doge Flow Dlreoti- }°'0 Prop...d Spot Elewlon .'? • Evsl'ng Spot Elev°to° G = Exsl,g Tree To Be Removed E3 ))- = 8' PVC ®1° Floor Dra, aPd Grate Elowtmn 2ND FLOOR OUTLINE RECEIVED 1 JUL 112005 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT c, CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 1 l `1?-- I 1I 1 b 1 rr h 1 a I 5\°. v 4 u? 1 I ? a 1 1 k I:' 1 rE 10? 1 ` 12, ?12- W T di 1 1`` 95 36 _? 11 ?_: I. 1 I lL?:??g.Nrt tOP=55.E? bso0 ? •°`v S IL= 4 m?E.iv?T l' S P51 ENE°588 5. ?5r ,vG„ D? WpOD M1h N?RIM= 15" PVC ?G?S Ixap,9 } ° 6 v2 IE 5 AE 15? VC 47 1 N'Y9"6$ } 1 l0' IE NW. ?9 + 5. = ,1 1 ,N 1 D3 R. ti. vT? 1 1 1 _?-000L v b sb ? 'l ? ? . 55v PARKING LEVEL 2 1 G . G9 NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION, m r LLC TW ! BEACH RESIDENCES CLEARWATER c99-271 oc r? INC. FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS . - , TER D ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT 209 P , SURVEYORS B PLANNERS ENVIRONMENTALISTS D ENGINEERS CEN 877 EXECUTIVE RIVE w W. eea 8 E .o•um To eo..e , , SUITE 205 ]050 Shirley Bbd. Ne. Pon Ri,h,F FL 34655 8648 TX(727) 849 7588 F 17 7) 898 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33702 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 1 708 05 REV SED PER DRC COMMENTS Oc - ev. . - 2 TEL (727) 369-0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 I oert, 1 13 EM E.B. No. 7421 r o 05 23105 a E 55 5! C 8 0 'bo ,16 C ? O} x ?t ry?IT - I II ?I C I? ?f A ... ]?'I I ??7 I I I 1 Q'?II'I?I. `II 'I 49d I ORIGINAL N o to ¢o a LEGEND ®1D Proposed St- Sewer . = P,,pased Grote 1,1,t 10 • P.p-d Slam St-t- Number ww»w+y.+.- = Proposed Silt Fence .._. • • ..•. ??..• = FE- Flmd Zone Line ??? • O-I-d Draln°ge Flow DireptI- ?--N-- = C°ncenlmtad Draieoge Fill Dkectjon +- Hard S,- Orain°ge FIPw Okedi- Proposed Spot Ele,ltim Existing Spet El-tlm ?• = U,ting Tlee T. Be Removed E3 B PVC ®''° Floor Dr°Ie wd Gate Elewtbn 3RD FLOOR OOIDNE 5 f I I , ??1 ?? 1? I, I I t v C) .RII"f?5-49. IRO {?• .c NW°2? b' IP.OPI L??pI Yy ? 5 -" V.9`f:1 l C) , 11,'? I ` t`j `1' ? 141,,111 ?7tI?!;1?? II u Q 0 u 44 n ^a?A .hp5 111 650 ,? fG15 y\Ax 5?4 q.18'?, ? nv V 1l ?1 . RECEIVED JUL 11 2005 1 ` 11? PLANNING DEP CITY OF CIEARR?MENT • 1 ??? '\ ATER de 65s PARKING LEVEL 3 09 , NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTS PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL PREPARED PORE SHEET DESCRIPTION we99'9 - C TW ! BEACH RESIDENCES • CLEARWATER, LLC. 6-z71 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 677 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT 209 9 w.w. EP ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 205 ep XE0 303027'. Bl.a.NeePorlR.rn.pFL34685 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33702 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 00 Tel, 17211 B99 7586 F°1 (721) E46.3646 I 7/06/05 REVISED PER DRC COMMENTS TEL (727) 369-0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 1 EM E.B. No. 7421 - M19 05123105 0< 13 E c 11 WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE REQUIRED, THEY SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND IN LEGEND SERVICE PRIOR TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, AS PER NFPA 241. 2. CONTRACTOR TO EXPOSE THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL AND CALL FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS TO VERIFY THE EXISTING ELEVATION, AND POINT OF CONNECTION, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE, Proposed Sonl,y Sewer R Sena. 3. LOCATION OF EXISTING SANITARY LATERALS, EXISTING RECLAIMED WATER MAIN, EXISTING POTABLE WATER MAIN AND EXISTING GAS MAIN PER CITY OF CLEARWATER UTILITY ATLAS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. . Prppoeed Wmn L'ne Valve A S-m. 4. FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING RECLAIMED WATERLINE AND POINT OF CONNECTION, PLEASE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PUNS. I W ` AAAAI? ?Y?At.AA;'? Proposed Slam Sewer 5. FOR LOCATION OF GAS SERVICE, PLEASE CONTACT CLEARWATER GAS. 6. DUCTILE IRON PIPE MUST BE INSTALLED BETWEEN ANY TAP AND WATER METER. DUCTILE IRON PIPE MUST BE . " - • E.Wing Water Mom , NSTALLED BETWEEN ANY TAP AND BACKFLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE. AT LEAST ONE JOINT OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE M i s NSTALLED ON THE SERVICE SIDE OF ANY BACKFLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE. I a„nory sewer r E. slog o ' RIE Y . Proposed r- Hydront PVC PIPE (S' AND 8) SANITARY SEWER Y = P,opoew Flre Dept C.-tion (FOC) PVC PIPE (SOR35) POLIVI NA CHLORIDE SEWER PIPE SNAIL CONFORM TO ASH 0-3034 SDR35 D-1784 (WC COMPOUND), LATEST off • Proposed Blowoff REVISION, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL PVC SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CONSPICUOUSLY LABELED WITH THE MANUFACTURERS NAME NOMINAL PIPE SIZE, APPUCABLE MATERIAL CODE OR PVC CELL CLASSIFICATION. STANDARD DIMENSION RATIO NUMBER PRODUCE TYPE, • ExISIN9 HydoNt Asttm61y STANDARD SPEC6TWON DESIGNATION, PRODUCTIONS RECORD VIDE AND NSF CERTIFICATION SEAL AND WILL BE COLOR CODED GREEN. PIPE WILL BE A MAXIMUM 13' WHO LENGTH, APPROVED PRODUCTS: J-M/SLUE BRUTE, HAW, ET.I. CERTAINEED CW/INTEGRAL BELL), + Proposed 80ding Faatprinl AQUA-TITS. NORIHSTAR. CANIEX, VULCAN, DAVE-DAVIITE. 2 PVC PPE QBSB THAN 47 WATER 0BTF6111pN PVC PIPE LESS THAN 4' SHALL BE MADE FROM CLEAN, NEW NSF APPROVED TYPE 1, GRADE 1, PVC CONFORMING TO ASTM SPECIFICATIONS D1784 AND 02241 OR LATEST RENSIONS THEREOF, AND BE SUITABLE FOR USE AT MAXIMUM HYDROSTATIC WORKING PRESSURES OF 200 PSI AT 23 DEGREES C (73.4 DEGREES h PIPE SHALL BE FURNISHED M STANDARD 20' LENGTHS WITH JOINTS BEING OF THE PUSH-ON INTEGRAL SELL TYPE SUPPLIED MAIM WSNETS INSTALLED. PIPE SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE NSF MARK INDICATING ITS APPROVAL FOR POTABLE WATER. ALL PIPE SHALL BE CLEAN AND ENDS SHALL BE TARPED DURING SHIPMENT. APPROVED PRODUCTS: J-M, CERTANIEED WITH INTEGRAL BELL, HEP, HAW. S PAC PPE W AND ASOM WATHi DB1I6UilON PVC PIPE (C900): PVC PIPE (4' AND URGER) SHALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH AIWA C900, WITH PUSH-ON INTEGRAL BELL JOINTS AND • • SUPPLED IN STANDARD 20' LENGTHS. NO SOLVENT-CEMENT PIPE OR FITTINGS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ALL 4' PIPE SHALL BE PRESSURE • t CLASS 150 WITH A DR OF IB. PVC PIPE 6' AND ABOVE SHALL BE PRESSURE CLASS 150 WITH A OR OF 16 PIPE SHALL BE YARNED AS _ DETAILED IN AWWA C900 AND BE FURNISHED WITH AN AFFIDAVIT THAT IT COMPLIES WITH THE REOUIREMENS OF AMA 0900. ALL PIPES INSIDE FIRE PROTECTION LOOP WITHIN BUILDING PERIMETERS SHALL BE PRESSURE CLASS 200 WITH A OR OF 14. ALL PIPE FURNISHED UNDER THIS SPECIFICATION WILL BE COLOR CODED BLUE ALL PIPE SHALL BE CLEANED AND ENDS SHALL BE TARPED DURING SHIPMENT. t APPROVED PRODUCTS. J-M/BLUE BRUTE, HWW, E.T.I. CERTNNTF£0 (W/INTECAL BELL), ADVATTTE NORTHSTAR CAN-TEX, VULCAN, DAMS 1 DAVIT 4 DLCRE ION R.@P•ON PPE CLASS 60 (6'•T21, CLASS 61(P) 1 DUCTILE IRON PUSH-ON PIPE SHALL BE THICKNESS OF THE APPROPRIATE CLASS AND SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C151-76 AND AWWA 1 Cl 11-79, OR LXSTEST REMSION THEREOF. PIPE SHALL BE FURNISHED IN NORMAL 18' LAYING LENGTHS WITH ALL JOINT MATERIAL INCLUDING 1 GASKETS AND LUBRICANTS. RPE SHALL BE LINED WITH A STANDARD THICKNESS CEMENT UNINO AND SHALL CONFORM TO AIWA C104-80. 1 APPSOVED PRODUCTS: CLOW, AMEIlCAN CAST IRON-FASITTE, LS PIPE A FOUNDRY. MIWANE-TIMN, GRIFFIN. 1. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS WELL AS CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS 2. NO DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM J THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SPACING, SHEETING OR SHORING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND PROTECT THE EXCAVATION AGAINST COLLAPSING. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL ADHERE TO THE TRENCH SAFETY ACT REOUREMENM. TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY "ALE PIPE IS 1 BEING WD. DEWATERING SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE NECESSARY. 1 4. PIPE WILL BE ON DRY, UNDISTURBED SOIL WET UNSUITABLE MATERIAL WILL BE REPLACED WITH COMPACTED SELECTED BACKHLL MATERIAL 1 1 AS APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 1 S. BACKFILL MATERIAL WILL BE SOLIDLY TAMPED AROUND THE PIPES IN 6' LAYERS UP TO A LEVEL OF AT LEAST ONE FORT ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE. IN AREAS TO BE PAVED, BACK-FILL WILL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 98X OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE METHODS PRE-SCRIBED IN MSHTO T-180 IN 12' LAYERS TO THE PROPOSED PAVEMENT. 6. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF CFARWATER 7. THE EVTENOX AND INTERIOR OF ALL PRECAST MANHOLES SHALL BE COATED WITH AT LEAST 15 MILS DRY THICKNESS OF PSOCD EP-21W51 EPOXI-MASTIC AS MANUFACTURED BY PROTECTIVE COATINGS INC. N 0 1o 20 40 RIGINAl 1. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AND THE DOMESTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONRMGi SPECIFICATNX6 AND CRY CA CLEARWATER SPECIFICATIONS. 2 WATER MAINS SHALL BE 30' (MIN) BELOW PROPOSED GRADE AT THE WATER MAIN CENTER LIME. 3. ALL POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE SHALL BE WD WITH AN INSULATED 12 GAUGE AW.G. SOLD STRAND COPPER WIRE WOUND AROUND THE PIPE FORMING ONE COMPLETE SPIRAL PER JOINT OF PIPE. THIS WIRE IS TO BE CONTINUOUS WITH SPUCES MADE ONLY BY METHODS APPROVED BY ME ENGINEER. THIS WRE S TO BE SECURED TO ALL VALVES, TEES, AND ELBOWS. SEE ARTICLE 41.02(8)(2) PART M' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS. 4. MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER ONES TO BE 10' HORIZONTAL AND 18' VERTICAL 5. POTABLE WATER SERVICE WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. 6. SAMPLE TAPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT 500 FT. INTERVALS ALONG MAINS AND AT ALL TEMPORARY BLOW OFF LOCATIONS. 7. LENGTHS ARE 3 FROM CENTER OF FITTING TO CENTER OF FIRING. 8. AL FIRE UNE AFTER METERS AND DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBUES TO BE RESTRAINED, DUCTILE IRON, CV55 350 (200 Pei). 9. THE CRY OF CLEARWATER, AT THE APPLICANTS EXPENSE WILL RELOCATE ANY/ ALL WATER METERS THAT HAVE TO BE RELOCATED AS PMT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. f0. ALL WATER/n E UNE EXTENSIONS TO CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. 11. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER WILL PROVIDE WATER TAP, SET THE METER AND A B.F.P.D. (HACK FLOW PREVEKIOR DEVICE) IF APPLICABLE. APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASSOCIATED FEES. 12. ALL UNDERGROUND WATERMNNS AND HYDRANTS NE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACCORDING TO NFPA-241. 13. CLEARANCE OF 7.5' IN FRONT OF AND TO THE SIDES OF EACH ERE HYDRANT, WITH A 4' CLEARANCE TO THE REAR OF THE HYDRANT ARE REQUIRED TO BE MVNTANED AS PER NFPA-t. ABOVE-GROUND AND UNDER-GROUND UTILITIES ARE IN THE AREA OF THIS PROJECT. PROCEED WITH CAUTION - CALL 'SUNSHINE' AND THE UTILITY OWNER(S) 2 DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE BEGINNING WORK 1-800-432-4770. EACH FOCI WILL HAVE A SON THAT STATES 'NO PARKING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION'. THE SIGN MUST MEET THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FART) STANDARDS. NOTE: THE FDOT HAS ADOPTED THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATIONS (FHWA) MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAMC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCO). CLEARANCE OF 7.5• TO THE FRONT, SIDES AND REAR OF FOCI ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED. ON STAIMAWT FM WATERAIMME 1. SANITARY SEWERS CROSSING UNDER WATER MANS SHALL BE WD TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 12 INCHES BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE UPPER PIPE AND THE OUTSIDE BELL/TOP OF THE LOWER PIPE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. SANITARY SEWERS CROSSING OVER WATER MANS SHALL BE WO TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE BELL/BOTTOM OF THE UPPER PIPE AND THE TOP OF THE LOWER PIPE WHEREVER POSSIBLE. 2. WHERE SANITARY SEWERS CROSS A WATER MAIN WITH LESS THAN THE REWIRED VERTICAL DISTANCE, BOTH THE SEWER AND THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF CLASS 54 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AT THE CROSSING. SUFFICIENT LENGTHS OF DIP MUST BE USED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 10 FEET BETWEEN ANY TWO JOINTS. ALL JOINTS ON THE WATER MAIN WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE CROSSING MUST BE LEAK FREE, AND MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED. A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 6 INCHES MUST BE MAINTAINED AT THE CROSSING. 3. ALL CROSSINGS SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT THE SEWER PIPE JOINTS AND THE WATER MAIN PIPE JOINTS ARE EQUIDISTANT FROM THE POINT OF CROSSING (PIPES CENTERED ON THE CROSSING). 4. WHERE A NEW PIPE CONFLICTS WITH AN EXISTING PIPE, THE NEW PIPE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DIP AND THE CROSSING SHALL BE ARRANGED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS ABOVE. 5. A MINIMUM 10-FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN ANY TYPE OF SEWER AND WATER MAIN IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIONS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 6. IN CASES WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN 10-FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION, THE WATER MAN MUST BE WD IN A SEPARATE TRENCH OR ON AN UNDISMR13ED EARTH SHELF LOCATED ON ONE SIDE OF THE SEWER OR FORCE MAIN AT SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN IS AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER. 7. WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN A VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIONS, THE WATER MAN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DIP (IF AVAILABLE IN THE SIZE PROPOSED) WITH A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 6 INCHES. THE WATER MAIN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABOVE THE SEWER. JOINTS ON THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LOCATED AS FAR APART AS POSSIBLE FROM JOINTS ON THE SEWER OR FORCE MAIN (STAGGERED JOINTS). 8. ALL DIP SHALL BE CUSS 54 OR HIGHER. ADEQUATE PROTECTIVE MEASURES AGAINST CORROSION SHALL BE USED. 9. A MINIMUM COVER OF 30' (2.5') SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE TOP OF ALL WATER MAINS AND THE PROPOSED GROUND (TYPICAL). 196 LF B' PVC FY(1^JL, I ,X L.. ' B' GOFIG S/V1 OF 37 IF OF B' F I Iii I 1 :CL j till ; , Oi LF 8' PVC WM II 9s', 8' GV CONSTRUCT TAPPING STEVE #t AND VALVE P T7 . (BY CITY) V`BY AEC -l. RE In II ??-8' TEE O BEND C RELOCATE EXIST T FH SOUTH 20' S' METER -?-2` METER -30 LF 2" DOMESTIC WM T37 LF 2" DOMESTIC YA R. I 1 (Ili, 1116 LF 2' DOMESTIC WM.}?q', it 1: C .11r ?,? n ? 11 'I`e? t, 01, NVJ=2 ?, IRON ' 40 'XE E. .R" C;iO. t tr e1="? ?C, 6^;P?N WIC d1 F B' PVT; : Gn 15 LF 00.45% AOJJ ST EXISTING MH RIM AS REWIRED Y CONNECT PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE TO .1 EXISTNG MH It = 229 UTILITY CONDUIT BANK (SEE DETAIL SHEET 13) r (,?3O.CLF 4 u 8' TEE V 11 ?? 1?- ` )6 oVd S B7 j5 3 1 ? ?.R1M-' g1 5 PVG ? 467 15" PVC 1 1 E NW 3 RECE PREPARED FOAL oc TW /BEACH RESIDENCES -CLEARWATER, LLC. FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. EP xomm T. m,s ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS SUITE 205 3030 smrxey Bmd, N<n PPr1 Rmn<y a SASSS ST. PETERSBURG. FLORIDA 33702 OC nN (727) aa54586 . '(,-y 648-3648 TEL (727) 369-0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 EM E.B. No. 7421 SHEET DESCRIPTION, ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT UTILITY PLAN JUL 11 2005 MANNING DEPARTO 20' 5/8' Min. 4 Required Pick Hole NOTE- STORM SEWER COVERS ARE NOT TO SAY 'CLEARWATER' OR 'CITY OF CLEARWATER' ON THEM. THIS SYSTEM IS A PRIVATE SYSTEM. LETTERING IS ONLY < nEW ALLOWED ON STORM MANHOLE X11 Non Skid 9m Pattern a Required L 0 0 0 36' 23' `n 21' SOLID COVER Machined Surfac N a m L I-- 22-3/4' D --I i o II J- RING - SECTION Machined Surface/ Minimum Weight 7' 232 tbs. 9' 278 tbs. SOLID COVER SECTION NOTES Minimum Weight 128 tbs. 1, Where roadway base Is e' or thlcker use 9' ring, alt other cases 7' ring Is permissible. 2. Manufacturers model of storm ring and cover to be approved by City Engineer. 3. Perforated covers, when required shalt be similar to solid covers. CONC. SIDEWALK Gross Plortb Other if Non-Walking 5ulace Other nfacs'- If 'i le leas Man 48' then t ales Adl ool of ec 12 : ISOMETRIC VIEW VALLEY GUTTER CURB CURB DROP CURB CONC. RAMP TRANSITION CURB TRANSITION AR F WpLR Textures Surface - - - - - - - - FL W LINE 4' 12',1 MAX. FI FVATION A-A NOTES-. SECTION B-B 1. Ramps pro destined to 0e eceaeromly Sl Unl(arm federd h with Dbmbpltles ftL the to Amat T y IN N S. Surf- Tortured to o to . l R p rX ara a ae amos et 2. Tamp or ra0er Depih Not Exce4dmg 1/B' by u. a4 M x a R Cony a Traffic R St-d of fDe Rpaa.ay and nark IS. I. slenearaa DatoN 304 Lf--9 va'? Or Morel R-t Madin.tlMe 3DEWALK RAMP DOTAL - .1. 7 STOW SEVVER MANHOLE COVER DETAIL NTS BROOM FINISH See Index No. 201 / I Z. Clay Or Cement Varies 1 M , At T-mina( Brkk Mnsonary Manhole '.. ,..' j cV A Bottom O STRUCK JOINT 01 Corbel STRUCK .MNNT DETAIL NTA _ 'D• Mn. xs.z 9• 0r To Suit Plpe 6' F DOTAL / 12'1 ?j` 12' xT1 10 5/C r BROOM / FINISH o? 1/2" x 4" BITUMINOUS STRIP NOTE CLEANCUT PLUG TO BE U.S. FOUNDRY 7621 OR EQUAL. E1?AN910NKWWEAL CLEAN OIII PLUG DOTAL NITS 6 1 C I square Button e B -ritt?d PLAN SECTION A-A hh' STA,IONRO PRE-PANTED DISABLED PWMING Smx VMIIE BaROER OR 1/8' MICN SHEET A B C O E F G A SYMBOL uwaWLw Shallow 0'- a' 2'-6' -6' /' Moz 3'-6' 24 Max 8' X3 at 12' E.V . BLUE BACKGROUND Standard 4.1'- 6' 3'-6' 6' Noz 1' 30' Max 8' XS at 10' EV , ?ee 6.1- 10' 3'-6' 7' 10' 4' 48' Mon 12' N$ at 10' EY , PARKING BY Dee 10.5'- 14' 3'-6' 7' 14' S' 4B' Max 12' tl5 a! 10' E.V . QL BORDER LETTERS, DISABLED PERMIT UNITE BACKGROUND ONLY NOTES L Ali concrete to be 3000 P.0. N BORDER $255 FINE ?? ee???ee MANHOLE STORM SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL WTI`B L GRMwD 5. 318 14 NTS ALL LETTERS 1' SERIES 'C' 2' NOT DIPPED GALVUIItED FDOT Type S-3 Asph Conc, patch to be 2' min thickness or -A& If this point STANDARD WETSW STEEL PIPE existing far thickness in excess is wlthln 4' of an Patch Resurf,ce AAe .idth of street on Monolithic Slab m )Dint, then the Joint. ; 'l ' J b ' III y , T (8' Nin eePlpce Bas Ian Itutllnnl ,000 Osl 3 - e . , ' a - CONCRETE MASS. Co Cohpactetl e ns n o ons F o a n - III FINIS LEVE FIMSH TOP M 5 FrtL MISS o nere w -I D , I . . . ' I A AisSVE Pe X M U T . , . Of PF/SOD. LEVEL I P' Existing Concrete Replacement base -terlal Undisturbed Exist small be the rEneneei 12' T,-h 12' ' use 18' W Trench IB' ? e l 'I .r y Ar Icle 6 Vitlth 6 Him, Width Wn. HA NDICAPPED SM D EAL 22 Voles Varies TUTS Undisturbed Trench disturbed Trench Side Compacted C d B.CkfIQ nckfAl Bedflll 2 O 1 e `mtX V t 34 a weds 6', then T 8 Base - ' ASPHALT STAEST REPLACEMEK[ KIS 6' MAX wnoxu POST FILTER FABRIC (IN POAnO4s CONFORMANCE WIN Fg ??k+ SEC. 983 FOOT SPEC.) S i e 3 n 9 G N ?3 m SECTION NOTE: TURN ENDS OF 1 FENCE UPHILL SILT SCREEN DETAL Nrs 4' Drop at All Drives II i'I-v2•R r W¢nring S-F-e A' S Base Subgrad`e . PRINCIPAL POST POSITION (CANTED 20' TOWARD ROW) FILTER FABRIC SILT FLAW ELEVATION ..ring ,,face NOTE: When used on high side of roadways, the cross slope of the gutter shalt match the STRAKW CURB ,ass slap: of the pdJaaeAt pavement and TUTS the thickness of the lip shall be 6', unless otherwise sh-m on plans. Bock aF Curh 3 TYPE 1 cum NI6 Construction Symmetric,( About DrivewaxC NOTES= Wearin 1.There shot[ be o 1/2' seal Joint Fnce o "?' B bet. Curb - Swface b-1, of cob and trhrceay. 2 Concrete In curbs shat[ be 3000 psi, 3' TRANSUM AT DRIVES "Ifiber mesh reinforcing. NTS ORIGINAL JUL 112005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PORTLAND CEMENT CONC. PAVEMENT I. GENERAL RIGID PAVEMENT CONSISTS OF CONSTRUCTING A SPECIFIED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING ON A PREPARED SUBGRADE. THE UTILITIES AND OTHER ITEMS IN AND BENEATH THE STREET MUST BE PROPERLY COORDINATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF RIGID PAVEMENT TO AVOID CONFLICTS. THE WORK TO BE DONE SHALL INCLUDE THE FURNISHING OF ALL SUPERVISION, LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND INCIDENTAL NECESSARY FOR THE PROPOSED RIGID PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION, 2. CONCRETE STRENGTH REQUIRED: ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3,000 (PCI) PSI AT 28 DAYS, CONFORMANCE TO STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY ACI STANDARD 318, LATEST EDITION, SECnONS 4.8.2.3 AND 4.8.3. 3 EARTH 1. 6" - 3000 PSI CONCRETE W/8X6 W/2.1X2.1 WWF. 2. 12" STABILIZED SUBBASE TO MIN LBR OF 40 & COMPACTED TO 95% MAX DRY DENSITY (ASTM D1557) TO BE PLACED IN 2-6" LIFTS. 3. 1/4" PREMOLDEO EXPANSION JOINT STRIP - "ZIP-STRIP" 0 20-0" O.C. MAX. CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL NIS PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION. 12 roc FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. Tw 1BEACHResiDElNCES•ctEARwATBP PLC. ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT F 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. II 1TMEP eI .e4ee» r ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 6 PLANNERS SUITE 205 PAVING GRADING 708 DB ...TS 303. Slm-Z 811,1, New Po11 Raney' FL 34655 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33702 + as OC Tel, (727) 849.7580 . Feu (721) 6483649 TEL (727) 369-0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 AND DRAINAGE DETAILS 1 REMSFD PFA DRG AITI EM E.B. No. 7421 13 a eau w? RETURNED CURB RAMPS NOTE: All pavement maAh93 to be Ih-oplaatla HANDICAPPED STALL OETAL KTs ORIGINAL PARIU G FFE• 6.1 UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE VAULT (SEE SHEET 7 OF 131 5•.tB' NOTE. C-te to b 3,000 psi - 2-12' Mn -? -? 2' xn SO- ?- i-I/2' -? A3 See ryPbm ryplam TYPE A TYPE C WHEEL STOPS REINFORCED CONCREE •WDPPDAt61.m1¢m 12" TYP. = 1.62 )LLAR 12 ELEVATION AT SEAWALL SECTION PIPE OUTFALL AT SEAWALL (STRUCTURE 50) mro- OMMDlars 4(Ix TF1 TYPOPA MCI! V9Wl mI TFI111,- annnUsa It BTted an ft 0. D. MIA. mM010 PIP. Far b PllueOllm. I9Fm0IlPlMr. PIP, CuD 81lp ANSI Ms.- Mndmam TFI M BP Ir S.1 l ?• Ringed 6"V-1 SERIES TF-1 TIDEFLEX CHECK VALVE NOT TO SCALE TOP OF SEAWALL OUTIALL PIPE 6'. TYP.? B L PROVIDE TIDEFLE% ;HECK VALVE, SEE F-E JUL 11 21015 MANNING DEPARTME FILTER DRAIN D.C.S. CITY OF CLEARWATER 'g, A A t-E B ' 30 D C_ BOTTOM EL V. 2.62 (TOP OF SLAB) 24' I L ? I 18" RCP r1 ? 1 1 IE= 1.37 5 5 6" PVC PIPE IE= 1.37 ELEVATION OF OCS SECTION "A-A" .1. -a DWL PK 2'-0' , I'- B9' OHW 5.46 SECTION "D-D" 13' lD J )ETAIL BELOW S BOX SHIMMER I-4' WEIR 0 ELEV 5.0? SKIMMER CONCRETE COLLAR TOP OF FILTER DRAIN = 5.46 TOP OF WALL = 5.46 _______ L FACE OF SEAWALL SEAWALL SHIMMER BOTTOM = 4.5 CONSTRUCTION/ IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS 4• WEIR ®ELEV 5.0 PIE. -?I_y ?rpBEEMMdT7 A TD ROD 0 0 0 0A 0 0 C PREPARED PORE 'C FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. CONSULTANTS TW / BEACH RESMENCES - CLEARWATER, LLC. EP Po.uu iP w..? , ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. SUITE 205 " 7 01.d, xew P,,I Rm6er FL 54655 3030 SI- ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33702 OC 8 Tel: (7271 849-]588 - Fors (727) 848-3648 TEL (727) 369-0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 E.B. No. 7421 E.B igMbP'rP1 F.t MmgaE 00. OiLprypi ? Longo HH 9ht 2 6 a rz 111!4' 15t1n' 10' 0' tp' 21?IN' t0A'4• 1Y 1Y 2B' 2Y 16' 3' 16' 08' 29' 90' B' AM 4E.' N" pp• C DO' SM ? 545'd 00 10' 36' BS' R9' u• ?q ?r sat,r 1a,rz M' 4B' 71' 91' ee• 1S. 6P eoyr Rs• NOT TO SCALE CLAMP FABRIC THIMBLE PLATES l PVL\ / \ TAPE HL,C, ML PVC TREATMENT FILTER 'ABRIC COARSE AGGREGATE COARSE ALGRECAi[ (WASHED) ROAD AND BRIDGE BPFgFlCAlI0x5' (801-4), (WASHED( N.T.S. SHEET DESCRIPTION, ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS DHYhs=5.46 ? I 1 EL=5,00 t VOLUME I E1=2.62 . y fi b JD MIL PVq 6" DIA 0 5 OC 6' PERFgiAiED P,v.t. PIPE OR ADS j• LOARUGAIED POLYTHENE PERfORA1E0 FILL k lS uEC 4 UNJERORAIx(w/SOCH7) ?t EL•1.3] (05i SroNF) fILRR MEDIA N BE WASHED SILICA SANG PER 'FOOT IDn 5i(ME) UNIFORMITY COEFF. OF 1.5 OR GREATER, AND 10% NAMEiEA EFFECTIVE LAAN 82E M 10 i0 .55 MM NO LIMFAOCN Ix ANY POAPOx OF iIL1EPORUx ASSEMBLY FILT ERDRAIN DETAIL FOR VAULT SECTION "C-C" I?. 12 13 9 SECTION B-B N.rs. SECTION E-E x.r.s. Ft.. BYPASS DETAIL Approved BackFla. `PreventeW Reelllent Sea as 6 Y Vatve? ( / Reslllent Bea, /-OS 6 Y Valve /( / /( Flanged 90• Hend\ !Flanged 90' Bend "" Uniflange D.I. Pipe W `MJ. 9D• Bend? ?W ------------ Flo. NOTE, 9( APPROVED DaUBLE-CHECK VALVES 1. 0 S L Y Volvo Handles At be Chained and Locked. Hareey-B.- Model Na 2 Anas 2000 SS Vatts Mosel 709 on 007 TYPICAL DOUBLE CHECK VALVE A99EIABLY Canbraca 40100 NTS NOTES. 1. WATER MAINS TO BE ON NORTH ar EAST SIDE OF R.O.W., APPROX. 4 FT. BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER. 2. SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 FT. FROM SIDE LOT LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE SHEET NO 3), THESE SERVICES TO BE COSISTANT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE BUILT OVER METERS 3. ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED and PRESSURE TESTED (TEST FOR ONE HOUR B 150 P.SI) UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE TESTING and CHLORINATION, THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SYSTEM AT ALL TIMES. 4. TEN FT. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER a SANITARY SEVER LINES. S. SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO 4' PVC MAINS SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ' SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO 6' and LARGER PVC MAINS. LARGEST SERVICE CONNECTION TO A 4' MAIN IS 1 1/2' and LARGEST TO ANY MAIN IS 2'. 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS TO BE NOT LESS THAN 36'. Threaded Corporation Stop Curb Stop Mr app UELLER rovved eedlITual /,/--MUELLER H14350 With oq (lap at 4I Angle) Lock Wing and ' =CAO Compression inlet or approved equal Saddle If Required See Note 5 Water Service Tubing Driscoplpe 5100 or Endot/Yardley Saddle shall have double rx Blue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene stainless steel straps with epoxy coated ductile iron body. Water Main, WATER MAN SERVICE CON ECTION DETAL NIS CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX NO. 401 TEE GV BACKRD1 11111T11 DENCE AS REQUIRED BY CITY STANDARD DETAILS GV ORIGINAI 11 B G 0 END CONNECTION TOP CONNECTION TEMPORARY BLOWOFF AND SAMPLE TAP NTS CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX NO. 408 Act ustobte Valve Box When Valve Occurs In RODtl-y, set Base on 10-C..... Brick, - TYPICAL FIRE LINE THE CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL A DUCTILE IRON (DIP) FIRE LINE TO THE LOCATION OF THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. CITY CODE REQUIRES THE INSTALUTION OF ONE JOINT OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) ON THE SERVICE SIDE. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE THIS INSALIATION WITH CITY PERSONNEL. SEE PLANS FOR FIRE UNE SIZE. Y Mech. Joint Valve RostraIn}ng lard, TYPICAL VALVE 9E 1M NIS CITY a CIEARWATER INDEX NO. 402 I CR088-BE r L Restrolner IT-.) Ebb. 1500 Serles (Typ.}? L MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE \ RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft.) NON PIPE VALV SUE TEES 4 B 6 10 4 7 1 l4 5 9 IS 25 B le 6 10 I7 29 TIE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS. L BEND INLET AND OUTLET 2. TE CUTLET BRANCH OFSETS - INLET AND CUTLET CAS 5. PLUS 6. LASTVO2) JOINTS ON A DEAD D RUN (Mr. 36') 7. LAST TVO2) JOINTS ON A HYDRANT RINGUT (nlh 36') L Thrust Restraint III.) RestraWnB Gasket (Iyp/1 L MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE (IF FITTING (ft.) HOK PIPE SIZE ELBOWS (deg.) 1125 2250 45 90 VALVE EES 4 3 5 B 12 9 6 10 IS - 4 L .1 7 13. 1 20._ 1 4 I6 70 DC NOT. THRUST RESTRAINT O SLPJOINT DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE U.S. PIPE FIELD LOCK GASKETS FOR TYTON JOINT PIPE or AMERICAN FAST-GRIP GASKETS FOR AMERICAN FASTITE PIPE THRUST RESTRAINT ON DUCTILE IRON FTTINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE USE a MEGALUG RETAINERS AND MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS. DUCTILE IRON WE WSTRAM NTS CITY a CIEARWATER INDEX N0. 403 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMEyNTALISTS, SURVEYORS 6 PLANNERS FIL 303 Sl %B1,d. NLNFn (72T) 840 ,5 -7588 - B E.B. No. 7421 EYISTING RADE O-PACT IN 2' LAYERS ' ABOVL R p COMPACT I i' UYTM WA1Bfl COMPT Irv - I'PE I PE ENO NTS H BACKML Stop Less Check MUELLER H14350 with Lock Wing O'CliCompression inlet or approved equoMUEL Threaded 5008 Corporation Stop or approve or nppd equal TAP AT 45' ANGLE Saddle required an 4' P.V.L. ony Water Service Tubing Drlscoplpe 5100 Saddle shall have double O 5tainle55 steel straps Endat/Yardley Blue Jet, with epoxy coated SDR 9, 3406 Polyethylene ductile Iron body. Water Main % LORNATM TAP NTS CITY a C(EIRWATER INDEX NaO 408 Water Mn 10• SIDEWALN RECEIVED Cleanout Plug 00 Edge of Pavement '31 ANNING DEPARTME ; Distance Varies valve Box ??phP R$ 70 THIS POINT --G?? ?AI1? E IT B NOTES. I 1. Steamer Connection to Face Street. 2. All Fire Hydrants to hove 5 1/4' Valve Sent. 3, Fire Hydrants Shall be Placed at Street Corners or In the R.D,W. Adjacent to Side Lot Lines Whenever Possible. 4. See Sheet 3 For Typical Connections S Fittings. Water Main ? Eclipse No. 85-B-- Blow-OFF Assy Including Lockable Cast Iron Box 2' Bross Restainer Plug •w BLOWOFF DETAL TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT ASSFw6LY Per Detall No. 403 CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX NO. 404 NTS CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX NO. 402 NTS SHEET DESCRIPTION, TW / BEACH RESIDENCES - CLEARWATER, LLC. 877 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE W. ADAMS MARK HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT SUITE 205 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33702 UTILITY DETAILS , TEL (727) 369-0629 FAX (727) 563-9674 708/05 pENSED PER DRC COMMENTS n Brass 90' Bend 13 NOTE. THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE H7 USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. THRUST RESTRAINT HEI EEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON SERIES 1500 RESTRAINERS. THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS. 1. BEND - INLET AND OUTLET 2 TEE - OUTLET BRANCH 3. OFFSETS - INLET AND OUTLET L 4 CAPS S PLUGS 6 LAST TVOU) JOINTS ON A DEAD END RUN (INn 36) 18' Mln, 7. LAST TWO(2) JOINTS ON A HYDRANT RUNOUT (W, 367 PVC PPE RESTRAINT 24 Nax, NTS CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX NO. 407 Connecting Piece a/integrally Oo Fire Hydrant Assembly cast Mech. Joint Gland on ITypC one End-D,1, Rotatable MecN? Joint Gland on Other End \ \\\\\ Length Varies (See Note 1) Valve and Hydrant Tee ./DI. Rotatable Mech. Jal Gland on Plain End Brunch. ® ^ MeVch. Joint alve `Water Ma!, NOTES. 1. On Hydrants Requiring Runout Last TWO Jalnts Must Be Restrained Per Det.ll 403 (2 of 2). PL NTS PREPARED FOR, Concrete Pad 4' JUL 11 LWaO'1 30' (1) 4' PVC CONDUIT Thick z f-6' Sq. 1 V (4) 2' PVC CONDUIT 6' or 6'- 1/8 Bend- plANNING DEPARTMENT (3> <' PVC CONDUIT Plug I e (See Note) ^? OF ?./LE!'1R?A?I? UM" CONDUIT BANK DETU NOTE.- Cleanout plug to be U.S. Foundry 7621 or equal, STANDARD CLEAN OUT DETAL (SAIfTARY) - NTS CITY OF pEARWA7ER INDEX NO. 701 (( () ? ? ?oo[ E 1L. J Bock of Lurb Mox. 15' - Him 4' - Mech. Joint Valve ONLY APPROVED T Kennedy rnn No. K-1114 Muller Centurion No, A-423 U.S. Pipe Metropolitan "?'-Restralning Joint (Typ.) "I- PYENTJ J "ISTNe ROAD Base NOTE. 1. TRENCHES LOCAED UNDER PAUEMENF SHALL ff COMPACTED TO 10OX OF UY DENSITY BY AASNio. T- ,, .-Do C. g TRENCHES NOT LOCATED UNDER -ENT SHALL 9E COWA D TO A FMRF55 EQUAL To THAT OF THE SOIL -ENT TRENCH. To THE 3. REPUCENENT OF PAVED SURFACES SHALL eE -E IN ACCOROINCE To -1- LOCAL REOU1AMN5.