The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-01005 (2)0 0 FLD2005-01005 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Date Received: 01/31/2005 ADAMS MARK HOTEL / RADISSON LONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH f ATLAS PAGE: 276A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW MAR 10 2005 PIAW, s DE?f fMEKli cm, OF C, CLW CoverSheet a 4r_ Planning Department ,I: ?"r {a l? 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 O SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION O SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION induding 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans O SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: * NOTE 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ORIGINAL Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/3012004) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT -- A- APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4.202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MSPA Acquisition II, L.P. c/o Pyramid Hotel Group MAILING ADDRESS: 260 Franklin Street, Suite 1540, Boston, MA 02110 PHONE NUMBER: 617=946-2036 FAX NUMBER: 617-946-2040 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Same as applicant. (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire . Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppe & Burns, LLP MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 PHONE NUMBER: 727-461-1818 FAX NUMBER: 727-462-0365 YKVYV,tU UtVLLVYMtN 1 INFVKMATIVN: (Code Section 4-202.A) 430 South Gulfview Boulevard (1r not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) 0.7/29/15/52380/000/0330 2.44 acres ---- PARCEL SIZE (acres, square feet) P^??"; " }°r PROPOSED USE(S) ANDSIZE(SX Existing 2.17-room hotel (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Inftll Application 2005- City of Clearwater CELL NUMBER:. EMAIL ADDRESS: timj@jpfirm.com 0 0 ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Exhibit "B" attached. Attach sheets and be specific when Identifying the request (include all requested code deviations: e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLYAPPROVED PLANNED UNIT OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPUCABIUTY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria l through 5. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation Impacts, on adjacent properties. L]\\. : ; .- _? " MAR 10 1005 Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infll Application 2005- City of Clearwater ? ORIGINAL U Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria 1 through 10. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site aid the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4: The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive Infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. r? • -- .,. ,,, ,, Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwat-MAR 10 2005 ?J i.7 .. ., .. "' 1.. ..I r.. ?.t•1.. C ? ORIGINAL 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design C Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addi or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stomrwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction In Impervious surface area does not quality as an exemption to requirement If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: - Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; - Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stornwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. - Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -- please design around the existing trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; L .?. ; J .i Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater MAR 10 PI .. . .. ?r.,?... .?,, ORIGINAL Q PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Q GRADING PLAN, as applicable; Q PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); O COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) Q SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing Individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; . . - Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(1) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offske stormwater management facHirdes; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. Q SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: - Land area in square feet and acres; - Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use: _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular. area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. Q REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) and color rendering if possible; Q FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVH2 ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offstte elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining wails and earth berms: Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Budding and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; W 1... .- Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater MAR 10 2005 0 0 ORIGINAL Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist'. of all trees 8' DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, Indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Boards Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %: X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); .. •.? .? •- -w rRwrvun eppaumun, as appncame. t.anoscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met 1 MAR 10 2005 Cllr Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005 City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS- four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 %: X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) ? Ali EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ -z? -,-1 r K TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) i E3 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: i? • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. C1 d f e. i ?, . . , . • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the Citys annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Eng'ineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all Intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. L. SIGNATURE: i, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. / -- -N Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS 2 th Swore to and subscribed before a this day of January A.D. 20 O5n me and/or by Timot ,y A Johns on, Jrwho is personally known i'fA Timothynson, fr. presenta of i 1, ._coMMissm# DD041066 EXPIRES -,Q September Z 2005 %,e o<«o,. BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE. INC AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: MSPA ACOUISITION II, L.] of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) • ORIGINAL t. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater (Adam's Mark Hotel). 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible development approval for a comprehensive infill redevelopment project, comprehensive sign program, comprehensive landscape program I 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Timothy A. Johnson, jr., and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (11we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. MSPA ACQUISITION II, L.P. Sy: MSPA ACQUISITION II GP, LLC, its Property Owner General. Partner BY: MSPA SENIOR MEZZCO II:;. L.L.C. Property Owner By = Property Owner ?o? %3nczc wSl? ' %c - P-r s: v t.T Property Owner MS?,? AC 61 +- I,h"fL r- STATE OF LA )k 1.1 COUNTY OF fore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned th laws of the State of Florida, _Ap personally appeared 'L(? W eposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the ida that he/she sign *as of MSPA SENIOR MEZZCO II, L.L.C.,1 Managing Member of MSPA ACQUISITION II GP, LLC, My Commission Expires: General Partner of MSPA ACQUISITION II. L.P.. SAPlann#q DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewillexible development application 2005.doc MAR 10 2005 . ??us + ? day of _ who having been first duly sworn Public Notary Public Commonwealth of Massachu My Commission Expires March 12, 2010 Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater ClYl, co-, EXHIBIT "A" ORIGINAL ADAM'S MARK HOTEL RE-DEVELOPMENT SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 15 E LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION: O.R. BOOK 13283, PAGE 2290 A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER. SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33, RUN SOUTH 77'41'16" WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE; RUN THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT (RADIUS-1247.0 FEET ) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET (CHORD- 296.09 FEET, CHORD BEARING- SOUTH 19'07'51 EAST); RUN THENCE NORTH 68'55'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 36; RUN THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS 36,35,34 AND 33, WHICH LINE IS A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS-847.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET (CHORD- 235.0 FEET, CHORD BEARING-NORTH 20'17'10" WEST) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Gulf Coast Consulting,_ Inc. Land Development Consulting 13825 ICOT Blvd., Suite 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 MAR 10 2005 RECENED 0 0 MAR 2 9 2005 EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR p l,MINGD?`EPARTM EPARTM MPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Ciro OF MSPA ACQUISITION II, L.P. 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Section B. Description of Request The applicant proposes to renovate the Adam's Mark Hotel and re-open under the Radisson flag. The hotel is currently closed due to damage sustained during Hurricane Jeanne in September, 2004. The applicant and its representatives have met with City staff to discuss redevelopment issues. The value of the proposed repairs and improvements to the site exceed certain thresholds in the absence of which the applicant could make repairs without bringing the structure and parking into compliance with Code. The proposed repairs and improvements include repair and restoration of storm damage to the room tower and ground floor spaces, renovation of the existing main restaurant and office area, general repair and renovations of the exterior areas, including entry/drop off area, porte-cochere, landscaping, signage, pool decks and pool bars. The damage is not sufficient to warrant demolition of the hotel. Therefore, the applicant's only alternative is to submit a request for comprehensive infill redevelopment approval, including termination of non-conforming status. Specifically, the applicant seeks flexible development approval of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, in accordance with the plans submitted with this application, including relief as follows: a. Termination of non-conforming status to allow the existing 217 hotel rooms (116.73 rooms per acre), where 74 rooms (40 rooms/acre) are allowed by the current zoning (Tourist) and land use designation (RFH); b. Height increase ranging from 140' to 155' where 25' to 50' is required by Code as minimum standard development, including relief from Beach by Design guidelines pertaining to separation of buildings over 100' in height; c. Reduction of 16 parking spaces, where 217 parking spaces are required by Code and 201 parking spaces are provided; and d. Relief from CCCL setback to allow existing pool deck which encroaches from 20' landward of the CCCL to 12' seaward of the CCCL. ORIGINAL i ORIGINAflECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 Section D. Written Submittal Requirements PLANNING DEPARTMEW General Applicability Criteria: CIS' OF CLEARWATER 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The hotel has been in existence at this location for over 30 years. The condominium to the south, which also exceeds current height and density limits, was built in 1975. Although the hotel was developed prior to the current Code and Beach by Design guidelines, and therefore, does not meet the building separation requirements, the applicant has sought to comply with Beach by Design guidelines to the extent possible. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. This is not a new project. Renovation of the hotel will enhance, rather than impair, surrounding property values. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The project will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The applicant has submitted with this request a revised Traffic Impact Study and Parking Study, dated January, 2005, prepared by Gulfcoast Consulting, Inc. ("Traffic & Parking Analysis"). The Traffic & Parking Analysis demonstrates that traffic operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways will continue at acceptable levels of service with the proposed redevelopment project and that the project's parking demands are satisfied, although on-site parking is 16 spaces less than required by Code 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The property is located within and at the northern end of the "Clearwater Pass District" of Clearwater Beach. The resort hotel functions as a "bookend" to the "Beach Walk District." Beach by Design describes the "Clearwater Pass District" as an area of mixed uses including high rise condos and resort hotels. 2 ? *ORIGINAL 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The hotel will continue to function in harmony with its neighbors and the adjoining public beach as it has for 30 years. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Demolition of the hotel is the only means of complying with current regulations, an impractical solution.. That is not the intent of the City's Code provisions regarding nonconformity (Section 6-109). 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The current assessed value of the property, per the Pinellas County tax rolls, is $16,100,000. The applicant estimates that the value of the property after the proposed renovation will be approximately $27,000,000. The value of surrounding properties will be increased by a renovated, fully functional hotel. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Resort hotel is an allowed use in the "Tourist" zoning district and is one of the uses contemplated in Beach by Design for the Clearwater Pass District. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. This request does not involve a change of use. A resort hotel is one of the uses suggested for the "Clearwater Pass District" in Beach by Design. This use is compatible with the high rise condominiums to the south, the public parking lot to the north, and the restaurants, retail, and other transient accommodation uses to the east. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. _ . , [This criteria was deleted by Code amendment.] J MAR 10 2005 3 77, ,c v. r - , 3 • *ORIGINAL 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. As shown by the proposed site plan and architectural and landscape plans, the proposed redevelopment will revitalize this location at the south end of the public beach. In particular, the renovations are required in order to re-open the hotel, which will greatly improve the existing conditions at the site. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project promotes Beach by Design's strategy of repositioning Clearwater Beach as a tourist destination. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Termination of Non-conforming Status The applicant seeks termination of non-conforming status, in accordance with Section 6-109 of the Code, to allow the existing 217 hotel rooms to remain on the site. As shown on the Site Data Table on the site plan, the existing acreage of --? the site at 40 rooms per acre would allow 0-7) rooms if the hotel were being constructed today. Section 6-109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status as a non-conforming use or structure with the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. See the proposed site plan. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202(D). This requirement is not applicable as there is a parking garage at the hotel. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. -, - - -- 4 MAR 10 2005 • • The applicant has simultaneously submitted applications seeking approval of a Comprehensive Landscape Program and Comprehensive Sign Program. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. The applicant has simultaneously submitted applications seeking approval of a Comprehensive Landscape Program and Comprehensive Sign Program. Height The approval of relief that is sought regarding height is necessary in order to retain the existing building on the site. The applicant is not seeking to add any additional height to the existing structure. Page 48 of Beach by Design includes an aerial photo of the beach that clearly depicts the existing hotel and two condominium buildings to the south (under different ownership), which all exceed 100 feet in height. The photo demonstrates that the height of the hotel is compatible with the adjoining buildings. These structures were built 30 years ago and, n such, do not meet the separation requirements of Beach by Design, or rn" eM6n of the Tourist district. the hbig t rreJq We have set out the height increase as a separate request for comprehensive infill redevelopment approval, but the request could also be included under the category of "termination of non-conforming status." Parkin The applicant is seeking a reduction of 16 off-street parking spaces from what is required by Code. As demonstrated in the Traffic & Parking Analysis, the parking demands of the proposed project can be easily accommodated. Relief from CCCL Setback As shown on the survey, some portions of the existing pool deck encroach seaward of the CCCL. Access to the approved plans when the hotel was constructed in the 1970s is unavailable, but it is believed that the encroachment is due to the erosion of the beach and inland movement of the CCCL since that time. The applicant proposes to refinish the existing pool deck in its current location and is not increasing the existing encroachment. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 5 a *ORIGINAL As demonstrated in the Traffic & Parking Analysis, the parking demands of the proposed project can be easily accommodated. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). The proposed project has been designed in accordance with Beach by Design design guidelines to the extent possible. It is not possible for the project to meet the separation requirement for buildings over 100' in height because the hotel and neighboring structures exceeding 100' in height already exist. 3/10/2005 9:37 AM 45606.109166 #336567 v1 - Pyramid/Ex to Comp Infill App 1 q r rte.. !`_ -, .. ?Ukt rI? ? 6 01/26/2005 12:30 FAX 7273918589 4 JOHNSON POPE 0002/006 Ilk: 4004006497 EK: 13263 PG: 2290, /2004 at 03:07 PM, RECORDING 5 PAGES $24.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $140960 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COUR pINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC9 A,o ORIGINAL a av `ao This lash>m?r Wsn PKparzd BY: ? James F- Adkins. B-4 Graeusf&W. Hemker & Gale. P.C. 10 Smffi &va&M. Suits 2000 St Louis, Missouri 63102 Record and Retum to:- 03? 184 LandAmeaica - Christina Oliver 1302 N. 19th Street-Suite 200 Tampa, FL 33605 Property Appraiser Grantee's Tax ldentificadan No. Identitieatkm No. 072915523900000330 20-0470510 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED [CLEARWATER] This Indenture, made Deccmber?k 2003 by and between HBE-Florida Corporation, a Florida corporation, hereinafter referred to as Grantor, whose mailing address is 11330 Olive Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63141, mid MSPA Acquisition 11, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as Grantee, whose mailing address is cto Morgan Stanley Real Estate Funds, 1585 Broadway, 3'7a' Floor, New York, New York 10036. Witnesseth: Grantor, in consideration of the sum of ten dollars and other valuable considerations to him in hand paid by Grantee, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, Bargain, sell and convey to Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever, the property situate in Pinellas County, Florida described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, together with all appurtenances, privileges, rights, interests, dower, reversions, remainders and easements thereunto appertaining (the "Real Property"). This conveyance is expressly made subject to all those exceptions listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Permitted Exceptions"). Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said property and will defend the same against all and every person or persons claiming by, through or trader Grantor, but none other, subject however to the Permitted Exceptions. As used herein, the teams ``Grantor" and "Grantee" shall include their respective heirs, devisees, personal representatives, successors and assigns; any gender shall include all genders, the plural number the singular and the singular, the phval. All standby fees, taxes and assessments by any taxing authority for the year 2004 and subsequent years (excluding rollback taxes and assessments by any taxing authority for prior years due to change in land usage, if arty), together with the payment obligations associated therewith, are assumed by Grantee, it being stipulated and agreed by Grantor and Grantee that said obligations are and shall be fully prorated as of the date hereof. 6721733 ll MAR 10 2005 C.- C.? 3 . Description: Pinellas,FL Document-Book. Page 13283.2290 Page: 1 of 5 Order 1 Comment: 01/26/2005 12:31 FAX 7273918589 JOHNSON POPE 0003/006 PIMLLAS CWkM FL OFF. REC. t3K 13 PG 2291 L Witness Whereof, Grantor has signed this deed the date above written. WUNESSES' ME-Florida Corporate a Florida ORIGINAL corporation IAAIOZVP- S St of Witness 5. , President l.nP1?AY2L i'Y1. QrBri{? N eofWyl_--- &*Paulle of Witness :SA-",A0 F. M S.11ns Print Name of witness 6721733 MAR i a 2005 PL. C1 ?1 _. ... _. - Description: Pinellas, FL Document-Book. Page 13283.2290 Page: 2 of 5 Order. 1 Comment: 01/26/2005 12:31 FAX 7273918589 JOHNSON POPE X004/006 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 1321W 2292 STATE OF M1h?1 ) ) SS COUNTY OF SZ. Ede1S ) ?_•?_L../ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this '? ay of Y?J 2003 by Fred S. Kummer, the President of HBE-Florida Corporation, a Florida corporation, on behalf of said corporation. He is personally known to me. signgddm- Printed Signature NOTARY PUBLIC my Commission Expires: I I?} 2M1 r D"l WNW ua.rNAc l4cWV Zed slr.dwbw." ca.ryas<laray 6721733 ORIGINAL MAR 10 2005 Description: Pinellas, FL Document-Book. Page 13283.2290 Page: 3 of 5 Order: 1 Comment: 01/26/2005 12:32 FAX 7273918589 JOHNSON POPE 0005/006 PINELLhS CWWfY FL OFF. REC. BK 13* PG 2293 FXMIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land consisting of Lots 33, 34 and 35 and part of Lot 36 of LLOYD-WHr[B- SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13, pages 12 and 13 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida and lands and submerged lands lying between and southerly, southwesterly or westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkhead Line described in and set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida Disclaimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official Records Book 765, Page 542 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, said tract being described as follows: From the Northern most comer of said Lot 33, rum South 77° 41' 16" West, along the Northwesterly bmmdary of said Lot 33 and the Southwesterly extension thereof, a distance of 400.0 feet to a point on the Bulkhead Line described above; run thence Southeasterly along said Bulkhead Line along a curve to the left (radius -1247.0 feet) an arc distance of 296.79 feet (chord - 296.09 feet, chord bearing - South 19° 07' 51" East); run thence North 68° 55' 27" East a distance of 402.14 feet to a point on the Northeasterly boundary of said Lot 36; run thence Northwesterly along the Northeasterly boundaries of said Lots 36, 35, 34 and 33, which line is a curve to the right (radius - 947.0 feet) an arc distance of 235.76 feet (chord - 235.0 feet, chord bearing -North 20° 17' 10" West) to the Point of Beginning. 6723733 ORIGINAL MAR 10 2005 Description: Pinellas, FL Document-Book. Page 13283.2290 Page: 4 of 5 R r ?. C Order. 1 Comment: Ct" ` "t ?_, `• 01/26/2005 12:32 FAX 7273918589 JOHNSON POPE Q066/006 PINE'LLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. SK 13 PG 2294 • EXII]BIT B PERbUTPED EXCEPTIONS 1. Present and future zoning, subdivision, building,. land use, and environmental laws, ordinances, restrictions, resolutions. orders and regulations and all present and future ordinances, laws, regulations and orders of all federal, state, county, municipal or other governments, agencies, boards, bureaus, commissions, authorities and bodies now or hereafter having. or acquiring jurisdiction of the Hotel and the use and improvement thereof. 2. Special assessments against the Real Property now or hereafter becoming a lien. 3. Standby fees, taxes and assessments against the Real Property by any taxing authority for the year 2004 and subsequent years other than rollback taxes and assessments by any taxing authority for prior years due to change in land usage. 4. All easements, encumbrances, conditions, covenants, restrictions and other matters of record pertaining to the Real Property or apparent upon inspection or survey of the Real Property other than the following: (a) Mortgage in favor of Fortune Federal Savings and Loan Association, dated January 26, 1984 and recorded in Official Records Book 5688, Page 1529 and as affected by Mortgage Modification Agreement in favor of Fortune Savings Bank (f/k/a Fortune Federal Savings and Loan Association), recorded in O.R. Book 6961, page 1841, and Mortgage Modification Agreement in favor of Fortune Bank, (f/k/a Fortune Savings Bank), recorded is O.R. Book 8521, page 1454, and that certain Amended and Restated Mortgage and Security Agreement in favor of AmSouth Bank of Florida, (f/k/a Fortune Savings Bank, respectively) recorded in O.R. Book 9604, page 33, all being affected by Second Future Advance, Consolidation and Mortgage Modification Agreement in favor of AmSouth Bank, successor by merger to AmSouth Bank of Florida, recorded in O.R_ Book 11858, page 963. (b) Assignment of Leases, Rents and Profits, executed by HBE-FLORIDA CORPORATION, in favor of Forhute Bank, recorded in Official Records Book 8521, Page 1464, as affected by that certain Amended and Restated Assignment of Leases, Rents and Contract Rights in favor of AmSouth Bank of Florida, recorded in O.It Book 9604, page 19. (c) UCC Financing Statement in favor of Fortune Savings Bank recorded in Official Records Book 6961, Page 1850, and as continued and amended in O.R. Book 8521, pegs 1470, and as amended by that certain UCC-3 Statement of Change in favor of AmSouth Bank of Florida, recorded in O.R. Book 9604, page 16. (d) UCC Financing Statement in favor of AmSouth Bank recorded in Official Record Book 11858, Page 972. 6721733 ORIGINAL MAR 10 2005 CIE .:r t;_--, .::.......I Description: Pinellas,FL Document-Book. Page 13283.2290 Page. 5 of 5 Order: 1 Comment: ORIGINAL Planning and Development Services Clearwater, Telephone: Florida 727-562-4567 ? SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan ?•?`w,,` ?"`,;?`?`:'??w?i~'" ??''??x;.;,;.A ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION 100 South Myrtle Avenue 33756 Fax: 727-562-4576 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: / SOUTH: / WEST: / EAST: / COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revised 9/19/2001) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 41001) APPLICANT NAME: MSPA Acquisition II, L.P. c/o Pyramid Hotel Group. MAILING ADDRESS: 260 Franklin Street, Suite 1540, Boston, MA 02110 PHONE NUMBER: 617-946-2036 FAX NUMBER: 617-946-2040 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Same as applicant. (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP MAILING ADDRESS: P. 0. Box 1368. Clearwater. FL 33757-1368 PHONE NUMBER: 727-461-1 R1 R FAX NUMBER: 727--462:0365 The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sectionslelevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the information provided an this worksheet: See Exhibit "A" attached for legal description. Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed .on the parcel proposed for the development See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to questions 1 through 5. 6 ?- i - _J T" 1 7% 77' 0 0 OR ORIGINAL b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. I \ , 1 MAR 10 2005 Y, ?... C I MY C' ORIGINAL 4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. I ? MAR 10 2005 Please return checklist for review and verification. Date: L ?.. I? v (Signature of applicant) Timothy A. Johnson, Jr. Representative S: application forms/development review/comprehensive landscape program application.doc ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: MSPA ACQUISITION II, L.P. (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I amMre are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater (Adam's Mark Hotel} 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible development approval for a comprehensive infill redevelopment project, comprehensive sign program, comprehensive landscape program 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct MSPA ACQUISITION II, L.P. By: MSPA ACQUISITION II GP, LLC, its Property Owner General Partner By: MSPA SENIOR MEZZCO II:, L.L.C. Property Owner p By : ?j Property Owner 1.4 r t ?/J?tI r - c4,-Property Owner ?f-r Svo? nca..-;W 1rv-- (!o COUNTY OF ` .' '. B _ re me the undersign an officer duly commissioned th laws of State of Florida, o is day of _ personally appeared 14 Cc? who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the conten`?s'of a affidavit that he/she sighed. . *as of MSPA SENIOR MEZZCO II, L.L.C , r, i Managing Member of MSPA ACQUISITION II GP, LLC, Notary Public My Commission Expires: General Partner of MSPA ACQUISITION II L.P. nuyuncCiv r. NL.CT Notary Public Commonwealth of Massachusetts My Commission Expires March 12, 2010 S.IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlilexible development applicatlon 2005.doc -J 'i MAR 10 2005 Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater p •? ••- . -.r+e ?- -,r-r 1 • EXHIBIT "A" ORIGINAL ADAM'S MARK HOTEL RE-DEVELOPMENT SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 15 E LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION: O.R. BOOK 13283, PAGE 2290 A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY,. SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33, RUN SOUTH 77'41'16" WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE; RUN THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT (RADIUS-1247.0 FEET ) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET (CHORD- 296.09 FEET, CHORD BEARING- SOUTH 19.07-51" EAST); RUN THENCE NORTH 68'55'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET" TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 36; RUN THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS 36,35,34 AND 33, WHICH LINE IS A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS-847.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET (CHORD- 235.0 FEET, CHORD BEARING-NORTH 20'17'10" WEST) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting 13825 ICOT Blvd., Suite 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 MAR 10 COOS ?. s ?^ ! C, ., 7 • 0 ORIGINAL EXHIBIT "B" TO COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM APPLICATION MSPA ACQUISITION II, L.P. Simultaneously with the submittal of this request, the applicant has submitted an application for flexible development approval for a comprehensive infill redevelopment project in connection with its proposal to renovate the existing Adam's Mark Hotel and reopen under the Radisson flag. The proposed development is described in detail in the applicant's flexible development application. Written Submittal Requirements MAR 10 2005 1) Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The applicant submits this application because the site does not meet the minimum standards for interior landscaping. This is due to the fact that (i) the majority of the vehicular use area on the site is within a parking garage, which is not landscaped; or (ii) is outdoor area that is too small to allow landscaping, such as among the drive aisles in the porte cochere area or holding spaces for hotel check-ins. To the extent there is pervious area on the site, it is significantly landscaped but it does not meet the 10% required by Code. The proposed landscape plan exceeds the minimum landscaping standards established by the City of Clearwater and includes a number of significant enhancements to the landscaping that currently exists on the site. 2) Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 0 0 ORIGINAL Due to the use as a hotel, the business is open 24 hours and many lights are essential to the health, safety and welfare of the hotel patrons, employees and passersby. The hotel will continue to use its current photocell system which reduces some lighting during late-night hours. 3) Community . Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. As shown on the enclosed plan, the proposed landscaping is a significant enhancement to the existing landscaping on the property. The beautification of this site has a favorable impact on the community character due to its proximity and visibility from the public beach. 4) Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The level of landscape treatment proposed exceeds the code minimum standards and will create a beneficial impact on surrounding property values. 5) Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The applicant has complied with Beach by Design guidelines to the extent practicable, within the parameters of the existing structures and improvements. The proposed landscaping is of a quality and character that meets the intent of Beach by Design. 3/10/2005 9:33 AM 45686.109166 #336922 v1 - Pyramid/Comp Landscape Ex MAR a 2005 V .. FROh :Ci' learwater-Plan Da FAX NO. :727 562 4865 ob. 28 2005 03:07PM P2 APPLICATION FOR SIDEWALK CAFE PERMIT April 16, 2003 City of Clearwater Development Services Department ORIGINAo,,outh Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 hone hone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 A pre-applicatlon meeting with Planning Department staff is required prior to submitting this application. Date of pre-application meeting: 3/3/05 DRC Meeting Please Print or Type: Owner/Qualifier Name: Date of Birth: MSPA Acquisition II, L.P. N/A Mailing addre$s: c/o Pyramid Hotel Group, 260 Franklin Street',' Suite 1540,. . Street Number Street Name Suite or Apt # Boston,,MA 02110 city state Zip Code ee Exhibit "A" attached. Legal Description of property Business Name: Calypso Cove Complete Company Name Business Address: 430 South Gulfview Blvd. Sprat Number Street Name Suite or Apt # Clearwater, FL City State Zip Code Owner Home Phone: Business Phone: t=ax: E-Mail Address: 617-946-2036 617-946-2040 Area Code Number Area code Number Fax number Data- CaN Opening: March 16, 2006 Number of tables In cafe: Seat count of 75 - number of tables unknown Intent to serve alcohollc beverages In sidewalk caf67 (if yes, there must be a valid Morlda license to serve alcohol inside the business.) Yes MAR 10 2005 PLAI! _NT Application for Sidewalk Cafe Permit - Page 1 of 3 , r-. - cl, FROK :QityOrClearwater-Plan Dec FAX NO. :727 562 4865 ?. 28 2005 03:07PM P3 ORIGINAL Please aftach the following dditional re ulre ion; Q Copy of a valid Occupational License to operate the business establiahment. Not available at this 'time. O Site plan drawn to scale (1 Inch equals 50 feet minimum) with, layout and dimensions of sidewalk; sidewalk call area and adjacent private property and building. This shall show all existing and proposed entrances/exits and proposed location, size and number of tables, chairs, steps, umbrellas, awnings, canopies, doorways, trees, perking meters, bus shelters, benches, trash receptacles, railings, decorative chains and other fixtures, structures or obstructions. Not available at this time. o photographs, drawings or manufacturers' brochures fully describing the appearance, color and materials of all proposed tables, chairs, umbrellas, awnings, canopies or other fixtures related to the sidewalk caft;. Not available at this time. 0 Written approval from property owner on which business Is located. owner is the business operator. CI Copy of approved State of Florida Alooholle Beverage I.Icanse (if planning to serve alcohol outside in the cafA). Not available at this time. For Sidewalk Cafes on Public Riohte-of-VU (only In the Tourist (Clearwater Beach) and Nat-9m Districts)' N/A Q Copy of written approval from any agency other than the City of Clearwater having jurisdiction over the right-0f-way (Including Florida Department of Transportation, Pinellas County, etc,). ? Copy of Comprehensive General Uabillty insurance on an 'occurrence" basis in an amount not less than $50,000 combined single omit Bodily injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. The City of Clearwater Is to be specifically Included as an additional Insured on the policy. The permit holder shall provide the City with a certificate or certificates of Insurance showing the existence of coverages required by this Sidewalk CaM Permit The permit holder will maintain these coverages with a current certificate or certificates of insurance throughout the term of the permit with the City. All policies of Insurance must be endorsed to provide the City with 30 days notice of cancellation or restriction. ? Copy of Workers' Compensation insurance applicable to its employees. If any, for statutory coverage limits in compliance with Florida laws, including Employers' Liability which meets all state and federal laws. All policies of insurance must be endorsed to provide the City with 30 days notice of cancellation or restriction. © Certified copies of all Insurance policies as described above, when requested by the City In writing. New oettifioates and new oartifled copies of policies shall be provided to the'City whenever any policy is renewed, revised or obtained from other Insurers. ? Imnortantl N/A The City of Clearwater may require the temporary removal of sidewalk cafes and all related furniture and fixtures by the penult holder when strait, sidewalk, or utltity repairs necessitate such action or when, at the Clty's sole discretion, it Is necessary to clear sldewalke. The permit holder shall be responsible for removing all sidewalk cafe fixtures at least two days prior to the data Identified In writing by the City. The City shag not be responsible for any costs associated with the removal or the return and installation of any sidewalk cofd items. The City of Clearwater may cause the immediate removal or relocation of all or any part of the sidewalk cafA or its fixtures In emergency situations. The City, Its officers, agents, and employees shall not be responsible for any damages or toss of sidewalk ca% fixtures relocated during emergency situations and shall not be responsible for any costs associated with the removal or the return and installation of any sidewalk cafe fixtures. The City of Clearwater shall have the authority to secure or remove fixture and other Items associated with the sidewalk eaf6 If necessary in the Interest of public safety. The sidewalk cafg operator is responsible for repair of damage to the sidewalk In the right-of-way caused by the sidewalk cafd. The repair shall be made to City standards and within a reasonable timeframe. The Community Development Coordinator may revoke a permit for any sidewalk cafb located on public right-of-way if it is found that 1) Any necessary business or health permit has been suspended or revoked; or 2) The permlttee does not have currently effective Insurance in the minimum amount as required by Community Development Code Section 3.201.C; or 3) Changing conditions of pedestrian or vehicular traffic cause congestion necessltatina the removal of the sidewalk cafe. Such decisions shall be teased upon the findings of the Community Development Coordinator, after consulting with the City Engineer, that the existing conditions represent a danger to the health, safety or general welfare of the public; or 4) The permittee falls to comply with one or more conditions of the permit. WHEREAS, (please print applicant's name) is applying for the right and license to operate a sidewalk cafe, a portion of which may be located on a pubge sidewalk, dght-of-way, or any other public property of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, (please print applicant's name) agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and all of its officers or employees from any and all claims, damages, lawsuits and actions at law or in equity of any character brought by any person or on account of any injuries or damages sustained by any persons or property by or as a consequence of the operation of the sidewalk cafe, and that said agreement to Indemnify applies whether or not the act or omission complained of is authorized, allowed or prohibited by a right-of-way permit. (please print applicant's name) further agrees to be solely responsible for any damage to the City property and hereby ?nm-7--w-releases-the City and-all ohits,ofBcers?and employees from any and all claims, damages, lawsuits and actions at law of inl equity that it may have against the City or any of its offices of employees as a result of the use of the City property, f Application for Sidewalk CAM Permit - Page 2 of 3 MAR 10 2005 777- FROM :CityOfClearwater-Plan Do FAX NO. :727 562 4865 ob. 28 2005 03:08PM P4 Tease read the foll0Winp information anti affirm with slanature: ORIGINAL I affirm that the Information given In this application is complete and accurate, and I understand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this application may result In denial of permit and posslble legal action. If granted a permit, I agree to operate within the City and state laws, and to notify the City licensing division if any of the information I have given changes. I also affirm that i am the business owner or owner's legal agent. SlgnaWMafid Titfd Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Representative Print Name FOR CITY USE ONLY - DO NOT WRrrE BELOW THIS LIN Corresponding Occupational License (OCL) # (for existing businesses): S-WILDWO DEPAR7MEN71Fonne 20021Sidewalk Cafe Applka6on.doc Corresponding Flexible Development (FLD) or Flexible Standard Development (FL S) # (as applicable): Zoning District: (Downtown or Tourist (Clearwater Beach) for public ROW; Commercial District for private property) Approval Yes No Date Inspector Planning Traffic Engineering Building Economic Development Other Gatagory # Fee $120/year Date Issued $50 for accessory cafd On addition to existing, approved business Amt. Paid If part of a FI.S/FL[? application, no additional fee Total Owner group w+ry ?+eManrar?r?.?rc1%-i -jn Y;rC; '.r:..: Application for Sidewalk Caf§ Permit - Page 3 of 3 r ate MAR 10 12-y PU11*111 • EXHIBIT "A" tRIGINAL ADAM'S MARK HOTEL RE-DEVELOPMENT SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 15 E LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION: O.R. BOOK 13283, PAGE 2290 A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER . SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33, RUN SOUTH 77'41'16" WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE; RUN THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT (RADIUS-1247.0 FEET ) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET (CHORD- 296.09 FEET, CHORD BEARING- SOUTH 19'07'51" EAST); RUN THENCE NORTH 68'55'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 36; RUN THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS 36,35,34 AND 33, WHICH LINE IS A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS-847.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET (CHORD- 235.0 FEET, CHORD BEARING-NORTH 20'17'10" WEST) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Gulf Coast Consulting,_ Inc. Land Development Consulting 13825 ICOT Blvd., Suite 605 ?. _ _ 3 )J Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 MAR , 0 2005- c h e C r C, _,' ... .. IMPORTANT: In these spaces, copy the ccOnding information from Section A. • For?nsurance Company Use: BUILDING STREET ADDRESS (IndudN Apt, Unit Suite, and erSidg. No.) OR P.O. ROUTE AND BOX N0. Patio/ Number 430 Gulf View Boulevard CITY STATE Zip CODE Company NA1C Number ' 08arwater FL 33767-2507 SECTION D.- SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, OR ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION (CONTINUED) Copy both sides of this Elevation Certificate for (1) community official, (2) insurance agerit/comparry, and (3) building owner. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGIPIAL SEALOFA FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER The equipment in C3(a) is the Electrical Switch Box and is located in the equipment room an the South side of the building. Temp Bench Marie Desc: NE Property Corner FIR IF : Temporary Bench Mark Elev. = 4.33 L] Cheek here if attachments SECTION E - BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY NOT REQUIRED) FOR ZONE AO AND ZONE A (WITHOUT RFF) For Zone AO and Zone A (without BFE), complete Items E1 through E4. If the Elevation Certificate is intended for use as supporting information for a LOMA or LOMR-F, Section C must be completed. E1. Building Diagram Number_(Select the building diagram most similar to the building forwhfch this certificate Is being completed - see pages 6 and 7. If no diagram accurately represents the bulding, provide a sketch or photograph.) E2. The top of the bottom floor (including basement or enclosure) of the building is _ fL(m) in.(cm) ? above or ? below (check one) the highest adjacent grade. (Use natural grade, if available). £i. For Building Diagrams 6-8 with openings (seepage 4 the next higher floor or elevated ftoor (elevation b) of the building is _ ft.(m) _in.(cm) above the highest adjacent grade. Complete items C3.h and C3.i on front of form. E4. The top of the platform of machinery and/or equipment servicing the building is _ ft(m) _in.(cm). ? above or ? below (check one) the highest adjacent grade. (Use natural grade, if available). E6. For Zone AO only: If no flood depth numberis available, is the top of the bottom ffcorelevated in accordance with the communitys floodplain management ordinance? ? Yes ? No ? Unknown. The local official must certify this information in Section G. . SECTION F - PROPERTY OWNER (OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE) CERTIFICATION The property owner or owner's authorized representative who completes Sections A, B, C (Items C3.h and C3.i only), and E for Zone A (without a FEMA4ssued or community- issued BFE) or Zone AO.must sign here. The abatements in Sections A, B, O and E am correct to the best of my knowiedge r PROPERTY OWNER'S OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP SIGNATURE DATE TELEPHONE COMMENTS ? Check here if attachments SECTION G - COMMUNITY INFORMATION (OPTIONAL) The local :official wllo is amttro)iz l by law or,p nna ce to administer the community's floodplain management ordnance can complete Section A, B, C (or E), and G of this Elevation Certificate! Cgjj f f , 461icj`6e)Wr1(?Aign below. G1. ? The information ih Section C was taken from other documentation that has been signed and embossed by a licensed surveyor, engineer, or architect who is authorized by state or local law to certify elevation information. (Indicate the source and date of the elevation data in the Comments area below.) G2 ? A community official completed Section E fora building located in Zone A (without a FEMA4ssued orcommunity4ssued BFE) or Zone A0. G3. ? The following information (Items G4-G9) is provided for community floodplain management purposes. G7. This penrit has been issued for. ? New Construction ? Substantial Improvement G8. Elevation of as-built lowest floor (including basement) of the building is: - _ft(m) Datum: G9. BFE or (in Zone AO) depth of flooding at the balding site is: IL(m) Datum: LOCAL OFFICIAL'S NAME TITLE COMMUNITY NAME TELEPHONE TUBE DATE COMMENTS 177 011) t ? Check here if attachments EMA Form 81-31. Januarv 2003 &1'1AL tKCitNL7 IVIAitINtN t A[;Y IONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM • O.M. B. No. 3067-0077 Expires December 31, 2005 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE Important Read the instructions on pages 1- 7. n n SECTION A - PROPERTY.OVWNER INFORMATION ` Fofl`ii-?uran:Con BUILDING OWNER'S NAME PoGcy Number M S P A Acquisition Il BUILDING STREET ADDRESS (Including Apt, Unit Suite, and/or Bldg. No.) OR P.0- ROUTE AND BOX NO. EcmpanyNAI( 430 Gulf View Boulevard CITY STATE Clearwater ZIP CODE FL 33767-2507 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Lot and Block Numbers, Tax Parcel Number, Legal Description, eta) Lot 33 thru 35APortion Of Lot 36, LLOYD WHITE SKINNER SUBDINASION, Pa.13, PGSA2-13 BUILDING USE (e.g., Residential, Non-residential, Addition, Accessory, etc. Use a Comments area, if necessary.) Commercial. LATITUDE/LONGITUDE (OPTIOt ( #9-##'-##.##" or ##.####*°} NUML4UN IAL UAI UM: ? NAD 1927 ? NAD 1983 F USGS Quad Map ? Other. SECTION B - FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) INFORMATION B1. NFIP COMMUNITY NAME & COMMUNITY NUMBER BZ COUNTY NAME Ea STATE Pinellas FL B4. MAP AND PANEL B7. FIRM PANEL B9. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION(S) NUMBER. 85. SUFFIX 86. FIRM INDEX DATE EFFECTIVFIREOSED DATE B8. FLOOD ZONE(S) (Zone A0, use depth of flooding) 12103C 0102&0104 G 6MS SEptarfcer 03, L003 AL?, WE/VE, VE, VE 12,13,14,16,17 B10. Indicate the source of the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) data or base flood depth entered in 89. ? FIS Profile Z FIRM ? Community Deten-nined ? Other (Describe): B11. Indicate the elevation datum used for the BFE in 89: ® NGVD 1929 ? NAVD 1988 ? Other (Describe): 812 Is the building located in a Coastal Barrier Resources System (CSRS) area or Otherwise Protected Area (OPA)? ? Yes ®No Designafion DateN/A SECTION C - BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY REQUIRED) C1. Building elevations are based on: ? Construction Drawings* ? Building Under Construction* ® Finished Construction *A new Elevation Certificate will be required when construction of the building is complete. C2 Building Diagram Number I (Select the bolding diagram most similar to the building for which this certificate is being completed- see pages 6 and 7. If no diagram accurately represents the building, provide a sketch or photograph.) C3. Elevations -Zones Al A30, AE, AH, A (with 8FE), VE, V1 430, V (with BFE), AR, ARIA, AR/AE, AR/A1 A30, AR/AH, AR/AO Complete Items C3: a4 below according to the building diagram specified in Item C2 State the datum used. If the datum is different from the datum used for the BFE in Section B, convert the datum to that used for the BFE. Show field measurements and datum conversion calculation. Use the space provided or the Comments area of Section D or Section G, as appropriate, to document the datum conversion. Datum NAVD'1988 Conversion/Comments NIA Elevation reference ark ed 1-1 m us coa Does the elevation reference mark used appear on the FIRM? ? Yes ® No ? a) Top of bottom floor (including basement or enclosure) 6. 3 ft(m) ? b) Top of next higher floor 24.0 ft(m) co ? c) Bottom of lowest horizontal structural member (V zones only) N/A . ft(m} 03 (D 'W -Zi ? d) Attached garage ( t o p of slab). 24. O f t (m) .0 an C3 e) Lowest elevation of machinery and(or equipment win servicing the building (Describe in a Comments area) 6.4 f .(m) El Q Lowest adjacent (finished) grade (LAG) 7.1 ft(m} = m a g) Highest adjacent (finished) grade (HAG) 91 8 ft(m) c ? h) No. of permanent openings (flood vents) within 1 ft above adjacent grade 0 ? ) Total area of all permanent openin s (flood i ' C3 h 0 s 1 SECTION D - SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ORARCHrfECT CERTIFICATION ?IC, w,?auui I lb rU ua slgneu ano seaiea by a land surveyor, engineer, or architect authorized bylaw to certify elevation information. 1 certify that the information in Sections A, B, and C or, Phis csrdficate represents my best efforts to interpret the data available. ! understand that any false statement may be unishable by fine or im risc nment under 18 U. S. Code, Section 1001. CERTIFIERS NAME Richard E. Marshall LICENSE NUMBER 4386 TITLE Florida Registered Surveyor WAR 16 L2005 COMPANY NAME Landmark Engineering & Surveying Corp. ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE 8515 Palm River Road Tampa FL 33619 SIGNATURE DATE TELEPHONE 10-05-04 813821-7841 FEMA Form 81-31, January 2003 See reverse side for continuation. Replaces all previous editions ADAM'S MARK HOTEL RE-DEVELOPMENT ORIGINAL - LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION: O.R. BOOK 13283, PAGE 2290 A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33, RUN SOUTH 77'41'16' WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE; RUN THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT (RADIUS-1247.0 FEET ) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET (CHORD- 296.09 FEET, CHORD BEARING- SOUTH 19'07'51' EAST); RUN THENCE NORTH 68'55'27 EAST A DISTANCE OF 40214 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT'36; RUN THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS 36,35,34 AND 33, WHICH LINE IS A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS-847.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET (CHORD- 235.0 FEET, CHORD BEARING-NORTH 20'17'10- WEST) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. W A R N I N G CONTRACTOR TO - 'SUNSHINE STATE ONE CAL.- I-800-432_4770 40 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY CLEARING OR CONSTRUCDON FOR "ISTNG UTILITY LOCATIONS CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 15 E PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA TION MAP OWNER: MSPA ACQUISITION, II, L.P. 430 SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33767 8 DEVELOPER: PYRAMID ADVISORS, LLC. 430 SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33767 NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES, INC. One Buckhead Plaza, 3060 Peachtree Road, NW., Suite 600 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30305 PHONE: (404) 365-7600 FAX: (404) 365-7610 FL. No. AA0002v774jVMbV31.) 40 A110 Landscape Licence No ? 000?t. 3a ?141NWd Gulf Coast ConsulU7' 11 .1l, o -t LBDd Development CD a 13825 TCOT BIVd., SDiW 605 " CI-ta, Florida 33760 PMRe: (727)524118?H Fax: (727) 5241 AL F,? DRAWING INDEX- SHEET TITLE 1 COVER SHEET 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 3 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PLAN 4 DEMOLITION PLAN 5 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 6 SITE DEVELOPMENT DETAILS 1-1.2 LAYOUT PLAN L2.1 PLANTING PLAN L2.2 PLANT LIST L2.3 PLANTING DETAILS L2.4 SPECIFICATIONS A-i GROUND LEVEL PLAN A-2A TYP. PARKING LEVEL 2 A-2 TYP. PARKING LEVELS 3-4 A-3 RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLANS A-4 EAST ELEVATION A-5 NORTH ELEVATION A-6 WEST ELEVATION A-7 SOUTH ELEVATION SITE DATA LAND USE DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ZONING TOURIST DISTRICT & OPEN SPACEAECREATION PARCEL 100: 07/29/1S/52380/000/0330 LOT AREA: 2.44 AO (+106.500 SF.) 1.859 AC. UPLAND/MU ST DISTRICT 0.585 AC. SUBMERGED LAND/OPEN SPACE - RECREATION E&SBBG PROPOSED $E PRESENT USE HOTEL HOTEL (j(IIBDL PARKING SPACES 203 (a) 203 (b) 21 7 (a) ,M 19aoM a1N1, Px&2q 9s9P PNx 5 dnlM ? Kati ,e.,°?°,,.>µ]iT ,e.r•+. Ndu6,01 N/C Rae E)aSTTNG PROPOSED DENSITY 116.7 UnRe/Net Ac 118.7 UnR,/Net A,. BUKOINO HEIGHT 140'-155' 140'-155' BUILDING AREA 32.729 S.F. 32,448 S.F. (283 S.F. OaeFeaee) POOL DECK/ POOL AREA & COVERED PATIO 18,180 S.F. 18,010 S.F. (170 S.F. Derreaee) SIDEWALK/ CONCRETE PADS OTHER RAPERVIOUS AREA 9,500 S.F. 9,773 S.F. (273 S.F. InaeOee) VEHICULAR USE AREA (V_U.A) 12.748 S.F. 12,463 S.F. (285 S.F. Deoeaee) VEHICULAR USE INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA 4,105 S.F. (- 32.94% OF V.U.A.) SUBMERGED LANDS 25,483 S.F. 25,483 S.F. OPEN SPACE/ PLANTER AREA 7,880 SF. 8.325 S.F. (465 S.F. I-) TOTAL AREA 106,500 S.F. 108,500 S.F. TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA 33,343 S.F. 33,808 S.F. (465 S.F. Inae9ve) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 74157 S.F. 72,892 S.F. (465 SF. Deareeae) flECUIRFD hT 40 Unite/Ae 35'-50' IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 0.687 0.683 RATIO (ISR) BUILDING SETBACKS: EL15TING pgOgy5E0 pEOGOTED f?T FRONT (EAST) 29.4' 29.4' td-15' REAR (WEST) 130.7' 130.7' f0'-20' SIDE (NORTH/SOUTH) 30.2'/33.0' 30.2'133.0' 0'-10' (•) PER TOURIST DISTRICT LEVEL ONE CRITERIA. FL00R AREA TABULATIONS-.276 OROSSBINLDDIOFO IUNTAREA- 32.406 SQ. FF. ARM STAUR U8VATOAARBA- 'Q- OARA06 - -L93)b0. FF. HO[EL FiR098 PLOOR ARBA= 29,OM S0. Fi. HOTELGROSSFLOORAREA- 21.0045Q. F7. POOL Eck BUILD 02 .FT. NON-BE510.'GROS9 fl.00RAR6A'- 293939Q. PL GROSS LA I A- 106.30030. FT. NON-RIi41D. F FLOOR AREA RATION(FAR) ^ .278 OFOl8 DAIS "-W o id xo' 4d SUM r - vd G1 C r 0 - m x n - o c ? C 28. < 1.0 f, . osr D A e O RECU V C ? ?e ?? .on°.log \ ? E D a 402.14' (1 • • E td665527 c MAR w 4 2005 1,.7i 1 „e a'ro . r PLANNING DEPARTMENT I CITY OF CLEARWATER Y °•°°' PIIGP.?0.aDFOa: SII¢¢F OFSC0.1PTfON: ? Ov1FCoast ConsolGng, lnc. NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES INC , w. m.n m.sy ._ ?aom,c?laoa , . ADAMS MARK HOTEL RE-DEVELOPMENT - ` „aumawo..s<mem, ,c,m, v,m One Buckhmd Plaza, 3060 Peachtree Road, NW., Suite 600 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30305 PHONE 0 6 7600 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN z 0 , scan Fca a 01AMY v T1 OF ariaw, a - 6 - : (4 4) 3 5- FAX: (404) 365-7610 - - ?.? a •r '° 'O ' " ' ^? ??` '°" ORIGINAL II l 16 W 400.00 S1T41 (R) ?( ?„o „ Bm womrna y' II m 0 a ?, - - - !11. f0 38' __ s a m° raw 6f l B7A6 IC) - __..... _ _ 576, Z7W lBI. r e w . =21'01 ~ s o 10' 20' W LEI » ?'? °.rm . q® • z °a 3? SCAUo I' - 20' . 16 wry ?? ; APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 1N WIDE T I G It SIDEWALIDEWALK T BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTE ED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BEACH WALK DESIGN SPECIFlCATIONS 3 1! 2 I y ® r r . NDM- SIDEWALK DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ,pT r ' r °°' / °r t J o u. R1 ? CLEARW?R REGARDING DESIGN AND f CONSTRUCTION AND THE PAYMENT IN LIEU av ? .qBp n f l OF CONSTRUCnON OPTION. to KL / m ! ? ? f430 STORY LOING I q? aan °°u'?- - ' F r p Q O f y r ? 1 \ ? Y BUI YA ? GG ??? VEHICULAR USE INTERIOR LANOSCAPE AREA ? ? AAA I a - :? y ?U 9?g q v F_ ? L"Tt9! \ ? ,? ? o dxd#` II % ,A ?w 8s e e LgRR a? m] Ia .„ w 0. , 46 as -?? ? % afM"" ? ? mr m ` m All 9 ? ?»e. 7w 0 ' B KI ° E 40 (R) , 4 - N6555 21 NEAR 4 2005 w ji' cl (p l . ? PLANNING DEPART MENT CITY OF Cl EARWATER raernBly TUa snsr ovsuuvnoN: &Z_ QulfCmst Comul6n Inc. e NILES BOLT N ASS C S C ' W O O IATE , IN . ADAM S MARK HOTEL RE-DEVELOPMENT 2 3/579 "'B' s?Er n ON ° DUAMTER OMUM 3 m reore,.w mrteeo, i One Buckhead Pl=a, 3060 Pe achtree Road, NW., Suite 600 - , c ....m r4kr mw nTLnrrrn, ceoxcln 30305 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PLAN o . 2 , I st a a arAxurtx men a Rs0 FR 6N ce9 a - 6 PHONE: (404) 365-7600 FAX: (404) 365-7610 -n-ae » LOT 32 ORIGINAL A62 wb A69 a66 o r To• ad S77°41'16"W 400.00' (R) )) 'SM1 ASPWT (NOT DIMENSIONED ON PLAT) ASNALT REMOVE N2G I 312.54' TO WITNESS CORNER PALM TREES _ REMOVE EXISTINO 0 9 ,0? 1ti y'1o PYLON SIGN AWNl WITH 9D'? u 5 CSC WICK R? EX. 5' CONC WNJ( CO NC WALK m A0O ,0O g;f y} 5 PoIE (i1P) - g? __ y? S IUND RAILS EX ELECTRIC ....................... y...... ! ......... ......... ... ... 1 .._ "'Bl•QYT.L(IC "RA'• ' HWD NOTE .?.... ... - (re) .. . ..... .... ........ CONC 1 S .. EOP ON come cuaR K m () Lksii a• , IL? 576'36'27"W 302.22' i SAW CUT & REMOVE ((J)) ?? yM1} Ek/s SO6'21'41 E E POLE ,}75 REMOVE EXISTING ry} 5? E%ISTING 4.23 A%k Q WSA ASPHALT PAVEMENT FLAGPOLES ASPHAU r? SAW CUT & REMOVE L' VALVE .COQ RELOCATE EXISTING CURB M EXISTING OT?? ? AC4SPIW.I LIGHT POLE - ? \ \ SAW CUT a, G UP ?7 I REMOV` PAVEMENT `0 T, } \C4pB ASP S PUSRO EDLCE ax s Puss RµD a9 ,r P n.s , ? CONC a IX g' CONC W111L 'No "N CO. 3 (T9) U.O.N.) \ u • IX. PNLK7LG U o ?- V /AV a u,- ?, vE wv I i luERR 0'R) WA V L-Y? Sc 'N: POLE _ P. 1T LEGEND 3.???K FipW PREVEM ?,o I o ?Z .......................... rrA S&T SCERFN v % I PROPERTY BOUNDARY I ?I o --- -? .- EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT J I I S -?-0 EIMM FUM ZONE ELEVATION ENE .II`3s Ep`I V [?`n{{?\,\,?,\1l1I/?I,] ® EN4IW6 TREE I??///? : • EXISTwo FIRE HYDRANT '° l I •.ll MAR 4 2005 - I I EmTDIO ASPHALT, GONCPETE eb/s ® - aAm TO RE OFl1oM91ED & I?YOND NONE PLANNING DEPARTMENT x s E E31N0 OBJECT TO ONE READ D% G CITY Ot= UI :AQWATER ? rn PRErnRSn EUR: snsnr nE9CN,mON: Gulf Coast Consulting, [uc.""?.' o'?? ?? E A NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES, INC. ADAM'S MARK HOTEL RE-DEVELOPMENT Y ??aAa uns amr?w.wneam One Buckhead Plaza, 3060 Peachtree Road, NW., Suite 600 ,u. ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30305 DEMOLITION PLAN T v ReWSa RR D aF a eaaml w °^• PHONE: (404) 365-7600 FAX: (404) 365-7610 - 6 LOT 32 o s Id 20' sb Ag9 p01 `06 V6S $CAIE 1'.Id 3 S77`41'1 6"W 400.00' (R) SIDEWALK ACCESS EASEMENT, SIGH 20' X 20' T TRIANGLE lµ e1 I + (NOT DIMENSIONED ON PLAT) IF NECESSARY, WILL BE EXECUTED WITH THE CITY. TO PROVIDE HANDICAP ACCESS - T I I ASPRN.T ASRK PROPOSED STAKED 312.54' TO WITNESS CORNER PROPOSED STAKED SFENCE PROPOSED HANDICAP ACCESS SILT SCREEN FENCE 1.6' C SFAWAll ATIH ' PROPOSED TYPE b' CURB 01? 0 -_CONC WALK S 5 CONC WXX P0WE. -Rx 1E (m) ' S+ IX. 5' CONC WAIX R PLASTIC HMO 11411S 35 .. .... s i _ IX. ElECTX cHr _ `? .' 7636'27"W 302.22 c ? g?} ' as cow CURB ?P 7 ' (Ie IX. ME fODR.INT Ju I U.O.N. EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN PROPOSED 5 RODE .yS 06o PAINTED SIDEWALK g. 3 wtn.- s1 PROPOSED T N Qby/ 506 21 41 E 4PP ?(T 4 23 2T E r 0 , I9 6 MATCH EXISTING S TYPE •D' CURB . pSPN . MATCH EXISTING ! PROPOSED O HANDRAIL ?? (ITP P .POSED STAMPED CRETE PAVEMENT - $ 0 CURB ?? 3 1 / wt, ? -1 ? ? T m h 4 ???" ?`y b 0 J + 20' 4' PROPOSED ?J• o TYPE 'D' CURB 16 B b-? JC ?S p,,. ?'IL' b ( o `c Vi ?? S ? 3 MATCH EXISTINGI 0 +o T2 3 9 ,• "^8 a <?z vQ \ti. PROPOSED PAVEMENTSTING 1 5' P 21.Q_ 65 JrGJJc"` TYPE "D' CURB PROPOSED I MATC AVEU,ENT 0 - \? , 20' ,` JV // TYPE 'D' CURB T' OT 9.i 't Y, / ?I LJ??? P I o dls tr? `. \ Yt __ PEST tr_ tr ? ? VIII ? 5.5 ?, B ON :. YS ?) ?g,? !fl s a C0IERED GONG o D ?'0? 5 ,og 1y P 7f.5•,? ?? ??" q O? 5. TpNC WALK E%. 6' CONC NL?7 -gP t .91 yt" O,SO` • 0S E%. 51.5 20' X 20' I 03' (MVP --?- 4 io CONC HANDICAP SIGHT TRIANGLE CDNC DECK (uom) _ 00 1 SIGN a PUNIER 9 1119§1 ab{ CONK PROPOSED MONUMENT 9GN l ?lI 3.? E(S) FLAGPOLES (DESIGN MO DIFIED/EXPANDED BE OTHERS) - PORTE CACHE CANOPY .a. r1 yE p (tvP) W 4 l D CONC. DNNI BAR, $ AT ER VALVE LEGEND WITH BACK u1DO PONE s OW PREVENIER o m o E 1 ......................... STAKED SILT SCREEN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 10' WIDE SIDEWALK TO BE DESIGNED AND =a •?I$u PII0PET7Y BOWWARY CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BEACH WALK LK DESIGN CSPECIFICATIONS. I D \\\\\\VAA'II - - EXISTING m'fE OF PAVOIFTIT NQ]E; SIDEWALK DESIGN GN AND CONSTRUCTION I 4 TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF Ec ttt /? F]e5111,10 FlmD ZONE ELEVATION LANE CLEARWATER REGARDING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION AND THE PAYMENT IN LIEU l SWAM RUNOT FLEW OREL710N OF CONSTRUCTION OPTION. MAR 2 2005 p MAW" EOBRNC GRADE I ill N4>•' PROPOSED SPOT 11"ATIOi Il oz > 20' X 20' M TOP OF pk® GRADE MIGHT TRIANGLE s PLANNING WARTiV1ENT Be _ EDGE OF PAVEMENT GRADE ? I aF {? ttO a? icaEJIA'©?*^? EXLSiN1G TREE C ?-? CITY OF `. ,? VEHICULAR USE INTERIOR _ I LANDSCAPE AREA YY EpSEW FIRE HYDRANT 0 PROPOSED PARIONG SPAQS _ .? w f lf C G Pae9ARSn V01 SIIEG PRGCRIITtON: m u oast Consulting, Inc. NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES INC ADAM'S MARK HOTEL RE DEV IaBnmdelprnv C9WGVg . , - ELOPMENT -- ' IM3f KOT&.w.SGItE m+ One Buckhead Plaza, 3060 Peachtree Road, NW., Suite 600 S awm, PIS u)w ATLANTA GEORGIA 30305 2 3 PER OTY d"Ran om"IS GIB u?E P , PHONE 404 365 7600 FAX 404 365 7 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN v ® M REI>gn m an' a m ttIMlwTS L 6 : ( ) - : ( ) - 610 rnm ? {? P 9-xe'%tdl0 CONCRETE PANNO -STAJPPEO WW ?eB,. P.B,I? CO?ETE e'XB't0d10 CONCRETE PAVING SMOOTH WW ®S°pp Ia. BROOM °? I I P°v wuJ °PPENDPUIIRD NOTES, P O FlNSIN dY ?? aSW90. O OROIM . a a t MW PoSt W H GLLVNEa°. Ml eM12 MIIS .ASNfPS - t e ,&uwM No 'JAE6 WSi eE g6R1106. muEa FOP iep1F1.91A1y BE PDitIJ10 0]M1HS Ap MA1f ? EY?Pw910N ' - MwT . - - •' a d IXPAN610N JOwT 1'd . PAN ER F 6ifm .Mr 1ONO ?' tAwY ?. MY?tE BR(GiW 0 . A Y.M. WPd59ti S.EYCM K 3000 P.L 3.906 4 4 FIHK iFD aT Y9C HAECMS eM1PA M ME Sna01,,EXnQ AvD BD2E91FNID W A SfEP NtY9MY BA,eORC (.®C) w MmLSS GASP T PAVWO - . AVIND I a B' 112' IUBIAAR °?? M ° ?S rz>B I.2' HCH NETaiP 1 V 41OM CA4 (WIEf(ZNES B) ,IM YN4N QI UNFCN IRMK w V 0 I- I ._ _ 11_ 1 LI I I I_ -I GGI1EWTf II III III 1II 1 I P I E 11_1 I 1-1 11-1 I 1-1 I = 1 IIi lII 1I1 1II 1I1 _ ?AOGREOBTE b M ° A i . ALL LETTERS 4RE='C' ., ... . • •.. COI11A d.\ffi v R S.l 6 C9IM90 6 1VI -m A MI?['aI f1006. (IBllw 91nM ALWAIS fA4 R91i) W A =a tm °.1IXWW W. MAT N DMA D k aEE M D M. 51.. ems, and nete? .... StTµ0i1 gPEKtONT e. 9d PIX, 9Ull SE MN. T-S OFJR .. BACR 6 OfIB I?\- - - BASE - - r - = _- - a •l::'k•• `I Y• •:.:>S•?? `--COMPADIEO SUBGRAOE \--ACTED bU ,F4DE ?RADIUS - r ?- ??>i I 1 ? : I P ` I 1 I - .SYS - e cwgp?ElE uw4 niN? S?ItdT Y°S O Ri7 W ?' N . . J Y.L- IUTAt¢r uc rrPR Ae O n IETELO tURF N t STAMPED CONCRETE CONCRETE SLAB FOR PAR KING m HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL NTS NTS CORE DRnLE070 T N S . . . SNRIKK GRq/T HANDICAPPED SI GN DETAIL METAL PO ST NREaU@12p.C. M NT$ T Rv SMOOTH BROOM Y8 E1PAN°YlN FlN6N SORAOE 1. VR SU - CONT..- I.-- W.w.M. 9NRWYGROUT T- F n ?a • d ' - - wN T P ENTRY STEPS NTS L _ III-III-III-III-I I Ir-I I-I 11-1 I-I-I 1=7 IF 11=1 I-11?-i I I-111' A a a iM1SA CONCRETE WHEEL TOP DETAIL I- I I I-1 m-I I i I 1 111 n L-III 1 ClIYRMt-BS, Mrg9aIlrY PnpbPTa Emelmwee®mYntCmYM Fld,a. Elo,lBl,.lawB Cdwlnsp tPlP Mt•IW FYxbF bIIWa.?rtwR G+INd Rlrwctrn MmxW III =1 ?I I I- I1= I1=I I IZE I I-1 ' `°"°""D°" ° - I-1 I1=1 I L=1I f-1 I I1=1I 1=1 I • enmuTx F+ETER, - "Xp1?x c coMPACrEO AaEaPEGAre BtivE II-III P - .III- FiPFORr TN0.R WTE NPw...PT ? A Al.sncFm.twt? ? ,rr, .? . a?AB°c , CONCRETE CURB AND SIDEWALK f M NIS RFBAR M. NOl1AND9TONE UNrt PAVER SEE PLVI FOR PATTERN ,. ypNO SETTYIO BED Ili w°V iirY?°Lwllm.t' PT-- tr.u1Iw 1 PDY YED npp e? PAN VIEW za swEEPJOwtSwTrN ,. CORPSE JOIMSAND • ?? ' ^w. "?" A516,o -ATTAR" TVO SILT FE.ItS T7r-- r ? -III-1 I I ,? H I1 111 I s.9,. •S° SECTION A - A _ ry1 I I I I STANDARD DETAIL AIiIIINAT! OETAR -1 I I_ 1 I 1- -1 I -1 I I- I CDN 1?? 7 I I I I I- -mMPACrED B'COMPACTED °UOO?E AOGRECV.TE BM1SE CnEIE BAlm ,MGN WM 1NTNe MNPBL x.2 ,tmr?F.R1?e..[II, ??Mw6F?FeRIYOI . ?etFI?WI S°OnT ??-?B.giia'L.• . m AVERS W/ CONCRETE BAND ,GOMaIO fDr?lna ?WO°enc?. M ?aN SS Fmcs 6Ra., 'x.FFmmsmve.. re?s,r.?a® I iNR3edPltantamFlc---- - NTS S*Oxe: wxtt: Nyd?mD.I)y /IOmtY, IIIe _ _ ue . ? 462 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. PREYAREU ('00.: NILES B OLTON ASSOCIATES INC e1RET OFSCPIPnON ADAM'S MARK HOTEL RE DEVELOPMENT V ? i '" ! i?\ '1'? F A / ? ?_ + ?. d ? ryw? eYBOncbpv.L?..YmoB , . R kt d Pl 3060 P ht R d NW S it 600 O - m `v .+ - - MsstmTYEw..was uc lea ne aza, eac Eee oa , ., u e °? - - ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30305 SITE DEV ELOPMENT DETAILS al F" ^'nS4Q090 PHONE: (404) 365-7600 FAX: (404) 365-7610 -nom - 6 MAR 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER F. (3/)000NTIE _ (3) -AGE PAL.M -5- _ - ? - _ - _ le) SAW PMMETTO „ _ - ? I N LI ICI I EX-GF-S TO I- JOT 5 0 5 0 20 1 (11/)OWATtF Ol1lNDEA NpiTH SCALE: f?1P (eel NwAN XAw,TKNiLI i 121WSWEPNM er. %6TNG PALM TO I¢- Jm pUYBG: INOl1M E- P- s TO REMAm? BRltx IiB (tIWBAOE PAU/ BY: MR (13) FORTUHE6 MAHONU E- PALMS TO NN E NtBA TAL PLUM - - - - • (tB SF) SOD V P}r 1'! 10 1 (/) ii 6/70YSTER PIAM ' ")M= I R ANVLLEA PRIM I t: t ? U1?TE PA1M-?'µD w .... -..- (? YSIER?PLAM (NB)OVSTEIL (21 KNG SAGO /ZlI NOIAN W P OI p?Ra j ® IxBI NDIAN Hxw'T M (a) GEORGE TABOR A-A ? ?a Ra .5 ??? i iµc uHESE o a?a1 I12)PURPLENEART F I ii ryul E?.EROREEN GIANT O m R L EXST d (uJ WTIRON PLANT TNISTmGP 9 OREAUAI I G E sTNC VUM (.s)orsTEx "?" T?. TO REMAN PLANT °" . ? ? 3 (6)lfAl11EPoE. ENISTNG TREE TO REMAIN F T TREE .: x • xISNO (20)LEATHER LfAF FERN OREMMN (5/)PURPLEHEART I x (9) FOIINNE9 MAIgNU O ? O Ft/? ATHEILEAF ? (taw OE TAROK I BAIL ONB (!)WANDEPoNG JEW (3)9AMeao PALM (/o51cALAnuM (16)FATS. (191fORruNES im-A I m (1)6AG0 PAlM 1361 FATSU E%?STNG PAIMS TO REMAM (/21 PUIBLEHEMT TNRrluls (2)5AG0 PALM lu (sIwAJKJERma 1 (3t35F)SOD P I (19) OEOROE TABOR I (11 SAGO PALM A2ALFA n5) NEAPPLE GUAVA (t61PURPLEIIEAAT (S1 WANOEPoHG JEW (tNI IANrANA MAN ? (/T5 SF)SOD (5) WANDEW NG JEW (6)A WASHINGTON i INSAGOPHM 1/) 10TX?ISnmG (s)wuJ No Es ro 0 Ew PecPoNESE FAN SAao (tom H EJBSTNG fiHPoKi$TO (3t )GE i wF'IPmP O REMAN EAffOR AULF.A ,.j. Ex6TiNG PA 9 1t611N0 ""' `?' TO REMAN ??r Q Ex6TING PALMS )/ THRYALIS r.e TO ENISTNG SHRUBS m REMAm `iS O T0.- y R GSHPoI (1S) LUM / PLAMTERS (150 GFISOD i ° (127SF)SOO I' ,T :) DPI?6 FE fq (2)cASIJAGE PAUUI O STANDPIPE (37)GEORGE TASOR, Q I EIEIt BOX AZALEA I O (266)SEACH SUNFLOWER O II -TIN0 P.M. TO II F1yf1f210{uR RENAM L------------- - I ]L2.1 WATEA FROM aKMT 1TWNOIE _"? ? ? EnaIINO FEF. ExOPONT -" _ ?. MEW SHOWER LOGItlx T REIIOYl YIO EEI0.5TN0 OECBUFG IfNO CRETE AT l110WER x[ GENERAL NOre 1. ALLPVwRxO AREASTO BE IRRKATfO LIGHTING LEGEND a SYMBOL TYPE ? „ 1% ® POLE LIGHT " iAt i 10 0 IN GROUND WEL L LIGHT 20 t0 ! 7Q T Q "_i ! r CURB CUT ANO T GM NORTH SCALE: 11 UY ?I : tea i?_- _ r• D- C (MB - BPROVK! PUBLIC, RANoKM ACCESS) 21 = ACCEN LI 2 R SIGN LIGHT § M BI LOUTKN AND -_ _ O1N? 2A _ '-0- - _ ? ? S STEP LIGHT I xu vBDE ID10/1O0 ' ?I PUNCHOM TO REL 14b I ? ?_' 9 _. -?-? _= ? _ xr BBA ?H: 16 L BT: N12 CO OR'A• PLANTING ARBOR _ - STAIYFD CONCRETE .? T p E%OTINO CURB TO REYAN BTAYT'ZSCOMCREIE "?"? _ "? RE YOVE E%4TN0 N O%M I f FELLDD : II OR PL.LTO I BEmro II I w. 1S9 YL• 3' - ., - ... .... ... . .. P MEW CUAO o EmTNO T T ?SOEWYK?" _ -?" Ail * SKX RNXGIP ?fr C_ b PUxtX WTCM ;; E%OTWO II I I I AxP TO aE R. mXC REre XANDKAP xC rE SOEW. .T. - e%bOroxO V.LWNO' _ ? fa31?E 3E?LW _ NEW 1-IDE SIDEWALK V TIi 0. F FOR T11e BANONO 4 TO RELA PLANTND BOR- - - FOR LUGOAOE CARTS AeTANNO IUxORAL I I t t 111A ?E?CONCRET2 ?IOIS ALN MANDMIL ._._ I`r '-..-._ •...". EW CURB _ %IS G w REMOVE 2 PAVIS 1 Ly $$y! tl? RT R W 4 / IS-TO BE RESUR CE BAR I ? Q$F SR O I b EPO%Y • ?_ r ® i?I O Ol a I O ME UI DN j • CONCRETE 4 BTEIEB REIANMO W TOR RAID YL I NEWCROSSWALK d G 4 !¢ d COXf+1! t ? ? ?I " FO M CONCREOITN U( TE PAVER9 O O O FOR pA1Pl ENTRY _ _ _" _ 'JN I w 3 1RAFORKX I i L G I I Om) .LD ¦ R GETUUNG V__ CONCRETE BA 9 Z ?I 13 13 13 NEw NANDKAP T''1 RAID wn1ANDRAE9-I FOR ARC._ All 2wxw BKXT TPUNOIE B I m euwNO o BELAYED I _ lMFIGM SKN i OUT .TA cecREE A- TO 15 16 MEW rEr OUARNUR I q THE ALO NG NO TERRACE * _ I UTTLTT,I I ' I I O n N I CONCRETE I 2FUNCXOUT i ® BAxo QYP.) F Q LED R.LNTEW ELY CANO FABPIC ONlmn+D PY BTRUCNBE A • T- 3Ee ARCH. EOE$MIP m § p X r I J? SEE GULF COMT ('Q !TART THE lAYOM OF • a, wc.?l DETAILS Of FOR SBEWALK I FOGLL DECK ATM CPENTERLNE OF THE IAKTE0. ADUUBTN ? I tT V MO .1 COORDNATE-M __ARC_C I I J =3' a ? oI BIGHT R wNGIE ? I .Q o _-TO d N ACK- ?;I of I I - I em as S l rXA MANS - ------------ _ ® ? y I E%6 NDI e%LSTNO PALr ::? FENCE PLANTER! SIIOWFR ? -To eE COIDR •T III HI%2a I lgNT TRYNOIE I y pj m yOgl wR KND O I l° f I I BE. ACEPOOLOEd , I F WRN EF .COAlWO ' AXS FENCE WOOD YtfTWO NTyµTO FENCE I THE POOL DE THE POOL DECK c1 gp m ?I ; SERVICE OAIe I / V ?1 ? I ENO RFSMFACNO- ,Y? V DRNERY OAT! i NEW E'CURB Fdi TMFFK IlLAHD I - I I } }¦¦ !I P roX ? 4 I SK-HTN TFR LE ?I xEw OPEx RALP?LFExCE To xATCX EDSTa#i exvr DATE +AVP10 ?]U TN0+ I Ew wooD TWcero I murww _._._._._ _aOE SEroAOtINE EXG- I ? POM NEW wDOO FENCEFENCE TORExw TO RFPIACE FS6INO ?? N TO REPLACE E%91N 0 - - I L1 2 ( - I _ 2a%HI SKKTTRIANOL E . gyn. EyN? ORIGI I Name -: Common Ni GROUNDCOVER MAR 10 2005 PLAN"?,'J_ F-O-. +4;? CITY OF C' ......... Size ......., 5gal• 3'x2' .......... 7 gal. _ 2 x 15' - PSI... '1 I' _ aments .................... ..... ................... ........... ............................................. ......... ____. ....... .....__._. __..... ........____. .? Comments ............. .. 5gal. 30 30" 36 42" o c l ' 5 a . x ......... ............. ......... ...... m ... ..ga . ........... ,.. .. '. 3 gal. 18",x 12" x 30' ox 5_gal .......................... 4' x 24" x 42" o.c. 24' x 24 x 42" o c al . . g .............. :ia 3 gal. 18" x 18" x 24" o.c. ............... _ " ' 42 o c. 5 gal. 24".x.24 x 36 _.._ 3 gal. 24" x 2V x 36" o.c. 21'- T Greywood ... ......... _..... Size ........................ HeighUSpread/Spacmg....._ Quantity Botanical Name Common Name_ .. 44 Aspidistra elatior Cast Iron Plant ........._. 268 Helianthus debilis - ...... Beach Sunflower 14-- Lantana camara'Gold Mound' Gold Mound Lantana ............................... ............... .... .. ................ 125 Liriope muscari 'Evergreen Giant' ...... Evergreen Gianf_ Liriope ........... 309 Rhoeo spathacea Oyster Plant Rumohra adiantiformis 43 Leatherleaf fern , l24 Sectcreaseapallida PurplcHeart 23 Zelmna pendula Wandering Jew.. (PERENNIALS _ .......... Quantity Botanical Name Common Name„ ., ., 405 Caladium x hortulanum Caladtum - 3 _. N3Tnphaeaspp Warr Lily ., ... GROSSES Quantity Botanical Name Common Name 1155 sq, ft. Zoysia ...... ....... Zoysia Grass (Sod) 18" x IS" x 36" o.c. 24" x 24" x 42" o c. 12" x IS" x 24" ox. ......... ................. ....... .................... ___............ Spacing ............... ........_ .._._. _. ..................................... Comments ......... ?. ... 12" o.c. _._._ . ;.. ......._....._.. ____. ..___. ................. ____. _..... ................... .................. _.... .___..__..... 8" ox. 36" o.c. ................................................ . ..................... ...._.. 18" o.c. ......... ................_ 18" o.c. 24" o.c. 24' o.c. 18" o.c. ................................................... .......... Spacing .......... Comments. x'ro.c• 0 .. plant as shown n a container in the collection pond id .... ... a in S . . Comments g ... p c .. .. ... ..... ... ._.._. a.urt uar i i /] i n .2 rc ein`xae ! ee.?r ruire tai?w ?rtl?'tarn?e.?w w .e ?mnwreerncuo.en?? rt? rem as ??? 1. Tree Planting on Slope B.I. N.TA Kam: a ""?i web _J Q z CD CD M. 2. Tree Planting Detail 3 • Shrub Planting on Slope SuL N.TA S.I. N.TA CV?MelaW.ac.,F.IVI 4. Tree Planting on Slope Snle N.TA ZZMAW- 7. Planting Bed/Turf Connection SNU NNA I ?m,nv?m.?u ===7- =A== 8. Sod Installation Scde NSA s? d q n 1 0 O m e N Z z JAM o?+'woxa o . LIAR 10 2005 eENT ! CF C' «o«a e61lW ORYIIOIAbTYLL 6. Shrub Planting Detail _- Sede N.TA raffia 190,1-1 F ;M1 9. Triangular Spacing/Bed Line 10. Palm Tree Planting / Staking I ]L2,3 Seale N.TA &W. N.TA PI Ch's' 5. Tree Staking Sole N.TJ. ORIGINAL SPECIFICATIONS u c 1 c `° EXISR ? 1R c R Ap c TgDE OF CAanN IInTS NF p)ABABj[[ 1RFF R 91RLIB PUUTNG MFIXINATON D Aw1N - A NI? ?D Ftta_._S? bTOdd there be anythng mom m die maen9a Nisi no! Treed me wg•tplkn to be .owe Mal be protwtld Iran At dell, riot be q= tled by the Col-to,. for a Rent .hods haw 'n bee-pits 2'-0' ymter N dim, tl PYRAMID 4- n the goolecalim0. m fiat Mom m the damoq, by o eood Inc. Nmlcade me, to or -g il twelve (12) math period oer dole of mceplonce. The Man toll and of v height MIM ell- proper mahag, b hnehaRr'.-d! to m the Q_ and moy be drawing. bat dwcraed N the epeclACOI'anq the game dming geratbna. Trooa to be wwa ell be Cmtracla melt replace d told materiel. enI at m e a tNl h diti t i l t M and Ngmwe goodie Plmt mmmnnla b,ee h l d t ' h represntld by m approved ropeI.Iatlw. Mall be Idly .mated it wMed wt m If tram, de.ignatee by the owner. No bow are to be r-d d' h n h t W di It ll f gorae, v g con on, Q a r a . no a nmlt. and m -t-UN, by the Lmd,,w. rwther an a o tree-pile 12 ,eater in diameter t en bel owth FIA i d i arw. h n ht f d hmelnofte, refmld to v. NAe, Bdtm Lm611, Croup Mom, n demlNed h both, The Cenlrml. Iv not to make my allrattma or <-- on the draringe err ,a ng or e old mwe w . . e m , o epocifically d.dgnoted unebturbed Rem e0h the p NMIIea. Plant, hdudkng tree, MiM haw ra nage en v g , . e or Draper bottom of It (lo depth of tent bd) with a Hit- of . NBLC m their only ,poielld rgreaenlallw is Woe,d N the leecifi-tine. Should my error appem, the : ,-tiro a ....If, In the oplnbn of die told p. t t h b en remomd A t t l d t partially died to dial maDa e n symmetry hew bem dmno ed moll be aidved wbjoot to eel, to ..the Lmd.e... ArMltecL mm. to A. be r.fined to the Londwap. Arm t before the bid, me wdnitted, w the work le emn.nced. or m ree no o ow e , eet, a cen rac ar amag a d the c hector eill be fined SI00.W per calliper I— L w g rVl...IL In wM ca 0. the opinbn of the Afln eetUl.g Me hew, I. pit mvA be backll1W The Cnhmtm .Ig.teg thb Agreunnt, or hb Wy I. I ,stilled It In. .-d h.e. The Cmhocte, veil ales be fm wM d h Lmdecvpe NMllool Mall be fl-1. xith oei ma, dim cmeNlly mttled by eoto Ng to i 4 t in I h appointee represmlolie Is hmhafler filmed to Me Cmhaclor- EI(ANINAlION Op m1F f ew reepmaDle for all caste n -vin, the l- ham the die. Plitt. imlae onginlaAY plmtled, I beaof 0. planted as oom. I— and e or hg r I,— I Dackoil. Farm o ea g . eac free. Sod pi vY Woe fI,... N Con-tare wbmitthq propwa. for this Ile Mot wAUR 'plndY gecified. Replocmnia Moe tarty v Iwdve The corn elmc d recpmvlbllly o1 BM- eel be P r m fiet wmnNe M• its and It omdl0me of I. vile. en. to the It he Will b I&. th I mm0 gommtee horn dote of rgWmIL Ah q Inot-9 rue h lawn and bed moo. In- M Ooma Trw plmlhg mlc Bo Prcent tap, W: 10 Drcnt coma. vend; 10 parent humus (A:1:1 1.11. by .dame); <-.demo N -g the arm.. The Omv recvve. the N prepovef. and Ill. to cm.kr.lim d wM h t e e' e .. I . Hoe. end oth, eat.Ng egupmnt tea W Cmtroet, y y g , N mddng rglmmn10. moll be immeekltly repe- and 1 lb. por mbk y-d of oplIfied fert0w. ghl to reject my a It bide. III to wive ac cemditime a. may dfwl the work under IN, cm . for the eark Ball b• fumbled by ON Cmhmt. It ?rAmem`rals n A n15 Aim caw c hb e.pnfe At the of the my - maY d ul N y n t -b and ,r- <uwr plml'n9 mi.: renew IB' hf 1tymh bide roeeMd. R izIF51 6 .CT0R be rgl,,W at the dart of ya . k l l I. b of ..-' wrbce eW .1 'W- eith Vw p..9 ml. N Inn aM levele nwumy Iv the Imvlbn Id @E13dS e == ; but h aW caeca. deed p at. the m•mlwf ee sold oo they me deamdW lave and Qdnmcez The Cmhaclp and d -jon of the ImMOCge cenehuctbn and for the fli d di k Id W lk The Cm.- I. regm.W la he emelmetbn of to be replaced Broaawl •wgen Plalh9 ml. Ill.- home., Smw.lrector. mW bind I-1- to campy .nth d ' n, ng. en ,o nq xar the ON, elm The Cmbadw Aal letIff eel b al bmm. Morn In the ImdwapNq plmlhg pin. or berm abate t l t t b ffecti he Th d th .mom 12 Nmw of edstNg evlew ao1 and replace .1. a -• law end adhame me rewirmnnty of dl ooUmil . y take My am mnwr«nmle of the sllq rill "" 9"I Benno mar be bull of eacawtoo ad horn N. e wmm o e e ve, e Q t CAW e. ie e, le att prole of lemt like o week rin tr it dnlhrMY bladed I. "th a ob. N Y ..1. al 21:1, tgaW hd a«ng ym.ekllm ow this prop«tn me ehd Ndalbn h l h h h t t th P D with the maeing0. and Mal be reap - fn Ue _t". dd an a. Id o1i flew etmrLon d/. t'MPBi ?e g y w Woo. end wlllwls bode ace a math of e, Md to pee awn P. p It m amt me- l d mbk d of I orn en ona m . orn e pro oo 9• 9 fit of hie h of the c ted .ah moan por'm mnpe E Ica d m w t be, A .W I the • m per plan, If m • ..ImN is mery fe, berm nee n or men., -- or I. reed for vZtIm4 metro. N ,ad.. Mould be ..I eve, to Wile for mowing .."ohca I t. ' b f . b -1.* u -.6. wtmoto to -t l, pH of S0 to B.O. n p e. ltlw6dn "t, Mal ghe hie P., I! wpmrid'm to . ,go . . campnwll w uran nee mtl refdlh To Inver. that prep« ma nmu g pe arm y the work, and new D IN. wpaintndnl account of dlffnmcse bete. ttl m u m,ae nle entl Wthml .colpn9 lam settleq 9 the Man Almng the 9uarmtee paled the CanVaclor cmllnuwtlY m the job to act fm hM. .. Im.elme Mom en the maehg0. but my wM wi lb, -smpimed before planting gm.., or abler the difbrme.. -d, moy be band Mall be .bmitted to I. pimt Tema a1 paynnt WI be oe mlobllmed by the Ownr. Lmdacope NMilecl or od),,Ment Nebr. proceeding (1) Make al Ieml one it, homed. every month to I. the work Public Iiobaity and preperty damage b-- WI be Wp#S 4i,tbbREtky7WW NATRtIALS Appo ll: The ,doetim of It noteride end -ben of dl operation. -Ved under thew marnga and '_. ore _).1 to p.. I, the .d..,. 11L5lkb61: orTRwrLanewem NMtlecl m Own. MW nom the right to m)cl d .- and d Bark ei. In lile_eplolm dwd not cowl the 1-th melt. of the ma., end ..-ton. al my .1., of I. opm,toh. Ae rejected ..I- mtl be rernoved by the Corbett. It weasel mail., bactm MW Iaywl hie work and wt nwesnry manna and elder and be _-No rm then cm Uon. the Loh-pe N<nil.t, m Deny. ewrvea the right to rdwate -be and bee, from Dmllbne m the pima pdor to Plontinq. The cmhmtw mitt notify the Landscape Ndlltwl, Omer al Iwd Ure. (]) dote In -1. that the Imotlen, me ,tiled mtl reedy ten mp- prig to plwling. AS K Item. are mL<Ipelt.d. they Mill be denied m wba wok ,I they cornet be covered by my of the oedfiwtkn, m dw.Nge The C-VOCtm mdl w it dela9W pew t> any estwa to the Lord- N t.L and d perform ..bm upon Mlln ..It. from the Oar . Lad- A,I- Nth. M«nce of wM eritteh order, he Mill not be mLBld to paymnt for stet mho ml, All bib fie, e.bo Bork dill be aAmittod .mthly. to emn ?t Men nom o on =N Mm9w N U, eel not Neely9 ad),vtmnt h e.tne the bn of the cmh eomvmmt it a ie moy ba eId by fie order I, by rnlt n stn. . SuM Mmgc. Id he binding on the Omer end the Conha</or. The Mnr efthml Inwlldothg the cmhoct, may -der Menge. In the em, cmd.lNg of additim daetime - other redaiana, with the contract it.. behg adjmtW ac 14,,. At Menge. n the rook Mdl be oothor¢ed by Mange mdr and mm be -,d moor the oppllcede cmdltl-. to the colt,- di-ante, I suecrpx ^CHIIF Tc iiTA K The Lmdao ti NMilecl I. the agnl of the Omor. He free -ority to .tap e-k ehnew wM I.- may be neceeeory to In- the m'...ewtbn of the Ailk9NUw,pe NMilecl b the Nlerpreln of the oledtim, of the cmbact and the )dg, of Ite pM-monoe he and ebo ndthr Wth the Oenr or Con- to mbrce he fI%U W-m- by both. W.g the emk U• prem... me to be kql nod and orderly al It IMw. Slmoge Drool tar pent, and other malorbb Mal he ,o -genia. that they loo. ore III and mddfy. M VII Indudiog dome molting horn rpm . weeds or hem patinq area pgmhq belt or pmlh9 plant. It be removed hem the ell. ddy m the eel pro,e••e. Al .sib me dtwa Mill be kgl diem by -oli and/o, hwi.q. Elemoted ad moy be didributel m the site oe boolld by the ann. ACCEPTANfY lecwtee. fer d Imde-p. work and be gild aver find ingmlim by the Owner and/or Laudeed, T.pe NMit.L pwNded the Job I. h a complet uhomilglt ,mditim, me Ur. b ,Dee (whet-,. coverage) N aA ,aaa leAt thla lbnq I, Omer WI as m the xcepled emk Acceptence of pared ph.,. w0 be cm.idered by the Omer. NANIENANCE The Centroctm I.t .-In ell tree; cMUb., and ,Dune a under thb Cmtrmt anti mceplmw. by nlerin9. wltlw0ng. weeding. ,raying end -Iocinq n_ to keep plant, le a hi,mhy. dgmwe mditim, and .It role bed mew ere may be r.quted to keg them neat. The1'aoVpdor and moint.ki all ,cave -der thb contract -te oaglawe by wolenmg. mnwin% ePwm . etc tl ..adNg moy W r• Nt, k h.-, It b mtOccdm kpoled thol ..ring tell be wfoolohl to -.I weW,. WtI Sid cmad el -I*g the lq tee h m. of eel m• rma en r h mnI. cad amps It - me vM. wlEft shut <mel.l 01 digging out ell pmt matmN1 othm thm the desired elvube and ,and mw awry tee week. Weldhq moy be horded by herNlade graying of U• cnbacler'e ,qns, If It Is mceytoble to d pain.. concerned. the above wmmlw dad not eppy Mme Dlmis de I"n m<glmca bwauw el inyry by el- move q hem Aald0. hd, heezq in..0. mew., n)vy by human., -- PIA- n theH. Plat m.t.Id ehdl be ddlmred to the site .I1 off. the bed. or. Iq-d and m. ready fe, panting AI shipmwb of nurery m.- It be ...gMy protected hem the can and Ira. trying winch durhg tran,it. At plants ehim -not be panted al m . one, edlwy to the site, Mall be .ell proteced ce agalnd th. p...Why of drying by line and can. Bale of earth m BM plente moll be kept mw•d W. wA . othr acmplaae malerla. AA pent. rmdn mopMy of the Cmtrwter -U (nd acagtmc.. Plente and be nursery mom, hooif vlgarauq homy, .tll-bamcy of nm.N -1 of growth be the Ipe l be h- fiII l , tlgl - They Mell haw mom cod rent boll III d moot m sewed the Mohdord. let froth In 'Amerkan erdnW tliw Amclotbn of Nurnryznn.-' The oral be berme -1,,% ane pent, mo be m,awrld ... 1 1, Norm. h name padtbn. Plmtn oral not be pruned por to delivnn eecgl upon geld 'PMW N plmhg of nor bem and ehrW; w deeded by the Londwap, NItdtL Rae be e.emted by .1. C-bo- at no o.-I met to the Mner. Shade trees oral W h.dthy, vigormq lull-hrmMed, wen-urged. and Mal meet the hunk diameter, height. and o r•od rtwlremnle of the plant lW, and meet the fla,dade of'Th, An m Anoclallm of Nunorymn.' Bab Man I. nor, III..llghtly t.-d and .W budopped. Any tree Iowa h the bell m elth broken boll al time of plentlnq eel be ejected. Belle mall be died h ..each... with the AAN 9lmdardv M daubs mE ,wndcow mat be of 'epw6men' welly, hell and bumy to the ,wad. mend of emipelt growth. Al pant. maI be hmdy .- ohmeti. cmditione ebnlor to thole N bcdity of I. oojeot. w+, '? w MAR JI 0 2005 PLo?....?C_:A•. 17e 27MT C1., r C_ ?. ?r.?. PI-i cord. in b.d, B' I.ger on the root bell and It o height ehioh aware. armor manage and 1W.. growth. BadDl with wi mleWre h the lame Proptime ere for I.. pl-Wg. 0moce1a Inlltnr Mall 'M gilled at the .to of fwr pwnda per 100 .gone feet of bed mac and -inked,to bockM mixture Cmund wtv bed. III be Iwanld I. o dglh of 6' and hetllzed with m ...to lenllzr at the rate of 1- po-de pr 100 spume foot Nokt pmt mw. Mill be ptbel It the .rkaed onto th. upper. lux III. (it') (.1 thel bed. d All dim er thane Neebd m'" W. feet end eoI hoer Mdl be mdI.d with r of doll, hoedeooa melts. Shook lM cmhmtor ncmmt. wq oonellbn. ehilh me Nnogltdle to .mend doe ig, it I. hb '4-11,llly to modify the wow thol the pmt. eM Wive, hdutle pov " dranage 1. bees or -1, beds and p.ddeg my wire wi w moy be rwuhed fn Dimling. GRA95 FtAXIING AI mopo to be aodeed mtl be riled to a depth of 2' boo. Rnimea grade of wed m eed bell It raked smooth. New m..t to deeealke end wzbe ohm be graded down to me Ina (1') Wow finim grad. to ell., In thlcknew or V.. bond-up. At gwef meow shall be fi Vized .Ith a --. -- at I. m/w It recommnded by grew cam wpplbc Sod m tI be plated with cad le indiml.d m the plmq Al .Id Mall be placed dowy I Jenks me mum betels blot.. Sodded mom Mdl be idled with a 200 po-d roller. walnld thorwghly and rereeed. M mull and pr-W beds me to be menmded 6' minimum. SW orb to be fro W. lows, me part organic ,,it,, od me port emd. Top mmieg to be a I' tap of mbi-nugget.. Thi...heel I. wbject to the doll end of 'Oradea end SI-dord. For Nueory Plants" a published by I. OM.I. Of Plant Indualry. Florida Department of A,,twit.,ot and Consumer Srdcea. Al the nclu,ion of this plmthq, if the LdnI—, Armttect or Omor ha, re on to belie. that the pl-te not of the epecl0ed 9,,d,. he .III requwl o regrading Inepecllm by The Dh,b,im of Plant Industry, and wM 'Ad- egl be the boat. fe, req.-tiing rop`h,. nt. of plml. end I- legal -other action lain by The D-1- of Plml Ind-Y oe..,dIng to I... Mmtd thl. become -I...rr. PLANTING NOTES: 1. The Lmwcgv Co,- oral way the wool looabm old de,th of el uWiuw me tote n.eary premuliau be pevml dmage to thus utlidn L The Lmd- Cmtrmtor eld .-I. III cen-tlon with the cpprop,- utflty cmnpny and and be regmdde fm my I!— to wkk. ]. Al oiling cad, mdl W roaceted horn plmlhg and mod, bale by the Lmwem. Cmhodor mite I. hdvlladm of m... Filmt molvide and etumpe hd'eetee fe, rehl-I MW be removld and d,pawd oN-file by the Lmmmpe Cmbaclm. B.- hot.. eith loped h. of root. and -. 6. Th. lmdwap. Con-tor mW I. regmakle fm the One ,adhg of d pmling urea. 6. At plating save Mall be lemgimd with 12//toob e.f. of 10-10-10 fnhltzn. y m plat nq bade mtl t mvAme-edgedito•] , mtl a,.. mulM. B me Lmdwvm Conhate, and eIfy dl .- watilk. In the event of o mmepacr, the w-- Mo.. on .. pan .l tvke -..- 9. The Lmdxape Con-or and ge- the oar with .Mtn bi-tknf on the proper cow ofd o ocifiW pint malrlob pnor to find ""It. to. N t«kbw. ben -1bg mend mope•b "1 be mmee to prodde a feet of mhhmm dm b-k ales. othrlee noted 11. F thg eW and -m mtl be anmded with mtl-antic I'me M a to of 2 tans/ova 06 NuwBm Il1Od1M .- w: WA Ch- .1 " V v 'r S Of y 1?y O m z° ? z 2 RCfig101 g hA g W. F T F L2.4 can plMlA! CLIR[TILTIDN K NAIERIMS The Cmbmlar. before wbmitting hie bid, mdl locale al necmamy matWd, w <died Ill In the plan. end grill o-, and and be wwrld of th.h -oblity for uee m I. )M. The cen4ml bide Mdi be bosld upon p?Affkd the epedF:d m.tmie. N.- p_.t..m.. ,he ifrd n the gwifkotlm and/err Ndimlod m the trawNgq Sub tfthoe .l W prmlltw way upon omnleelon of poor thd ei,le- plml. me not mtdnable. Id with the of-bmbn of the Imd.coq NMllnt and the City of wee m. Wttn rewwla with neorwl awloble dig vmlely If Dlml, end coke adp.tm.t me to be vubmlIled to the Lmdecape ArMitnt and the City of wwtm. SUPERNSIIXI The Loh-pe NMitwt rt. fiat engage In my ray to wP.l.lnd w o. to role. the Cmtrwte, of r.,.,lbAlly rm the compete and proper e.ewllm of the work no, fm the cm.equncw of neglect a mdmmam by non v fib wbmdholn error PWmn d work rewkW to compiele the Im.- mtdatim Ndudiny all labor, materiel., .renew. mE epnipmnt nooeeemy and deer eW hmm and M. I the --olyle, m-, Amerkm Steedmd fer K.- Stook edilim epproved November 6. 1996 1912: eatlan of Slmdmdizld Plml Nemn (1) AI plmta mall be Flmko No. 1 m better as mNined'n On .. --. panto mot beN'il?ap_. atMa: (2) n oLmde al dCmlr Nt' I. M dole for lea w1, Vol I. cool W brwght a' a -the attmtlan of lheg -.p. NMilecl howew, It is the cmhoetoia ragm•kAlty to proNd• "."t ='%. m pore end plat beef fo Not ..as " proper .entity o/ aF uba f- Ue mwe dedmded. (]) pr=ew>ae to Oe lomted elthr cmplettly Ileah or. not 1 1be athb,t <iwP b.aq (e) The Lmele, I Coebucla b room Tle for d •lakflg and guying of ben aecrloin ony manlnmw deficbwiee. (2) Info. Mn•i. maNlnmce cap- of my manta-c. delkimue. (]) Prepme wnltm domvmmtietiun of the .its hgwllm noting It d.-eho, ne.ht.od, ..tmnc. -I. pr,omtl oho ore made arms of Oclrmk., -ody n m.thed, and my other prt'nnl -mil .alnlnmca (e) Submit thb alum walmmWile of the .mthly hgoollm to the l.maecape y——, w eel as to the Omer. ORIGINAL n PORTE (,OCHE e? ENTRY MEETING ROOM ' FUTURE RE5TE3AURANT ----?_-_:::--- LOB 3 KITCHEN - I O I - _ COVERED I _ PATIO I RESTAURANT DEC v - 13 PRE-FUNCTION BANQUET BANQUET j? BANQUET ij BANQUET I JOB NUMBER: 10404120 I ti °o ID a vi z U O m m 0 m O ---- OO ?? o o a yvm I I I m z ?' E' t+m) a v 3 owns: ??I ? ogre uesewrnox N r"? is mu w.?em„a I I KITCHEN - ? - ... ? i --- S G ENTRY PARKIN RAMP -° - - - ? p' a EMIL OFFICE a9 cc). F w y BAR 3 MEAL RESTAURANT .. \IV 11 7] F7 FLOOR AREA TABULATIONS = .218 6R055 FLOOR AREAS BY USE (FUTURE) GROUND GROUND FLOOR - LOBBY PLAN LEVEL PLAN 6RC55 BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA = 32, 446 SQ.FT. HOTEL GROSS FLOOR AREA = 29, 044 5a FT. RESTAURANT d LOUNGE = 5,064 5Q.FT. (= 6.953 SQ.FTJ 3/32" = I'-O" STAR 4 ELEVATOR AREA = -449 50.FT. POOL DECK BUILDING AREAS = 548 SO.FT. BANQUET MEETING ROOMS = 6,355 50.FT. (= 3,943 SO.FT.) GARAGE AREA = -2.953 50-FT- NON-RE51D. "GRO55 FLOOR AREA" = 29, 592 5Q.FT. ADMINI5TfLATIVE OFFICES =.2,311 50.FT. (= 2311 50.FT.) HOTEL 6RO55 FLOOR AREA = 214,044 50.FT. GRO55 LAND AREA =106500 50.FT. AGGE55ORY RETAIL = 201 50.FT. (= 201 50.FTJ ?- NON-RE51D. FLOOR AREA RATION (FAR) = .718 SERVICE AND CIRCULATION = 15.113 50.FT. (=15.113 SOFT.) TOTAL C-RO55 AREA = 29,044 50.FT. (=29,044 50.FTJ DATE: 1/11/2005 A JOB NUMBER: 10404100 f f ?? 7 :tz 1 c:::p V I ev Ll U r? o m r tJ i p a;l mL' !/ m ZZoGI Z E On:* "N' 0 ¦¦¦¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦¦¦¦¦ . . 6-L 6r , - - r= r- , 3 6 DAl£ DEBCRIPTON Yun t nNx f UIW H 4 4 VAN- CD cr-0, x O ??? I ? ! 4 9 6 ? D 9 ? [j? 6ARA6E TABULATIONS S SEE SHEET A-2a TYP. PARKIN6 LEVELS 3-4 TYPICAL 6A (5E LEVEL 0 3RD A-2 3/32" = I'-O" DATE: 1/11/2005 z:vna+o.??o.o.z??zs?n,?o«,vs-vm?a.a Plou.c uo a zoos - ic.s«?, e„ ?r s V I I I , e Ott r.Ij -'? -? c%44 rr r1 l ? o e e . CD 0 Ii t y ? ? I y o l o o o e o o l o o o l o l l o l o l o o o o o OARAOE TABULATIONS PARKING TABULATIONS FLOORS 68055 AREA 5PACE5 REQUIRED PROVIDED LEVEL I = 2,953 5G.FT. 2 ROOM5 ® I/ROOM x 211 ROOMS = 211 DECK = N5 (b HGA) LEVEL 2 = 31,128 50.FT. 67 (3 HGA) TOTAL = 211 51TE = 5 (1 HGA-VAN) LEVEL 3 = 30,350 50.FT. 15 (3 HGA) TOTAL = 203 (7 HGA) LEVEL 4 = 28.112 50.FT. 54 REQUIRED = 211 (7 HGA) TOTAL5 = 93,143 50.FT. 198 (b HGA) DELTA= -14 (0 HGA) Z:-01\10101)\1]SPnFP\DP.a -P-d- PIP11- Yor 23. 2005 - 11:02. Cr r"mY, TYPICAL 6ARA6E LEVEL ® 2ND 3/32" = 1'-0" JOB NUMBER: 10404100 u o ? o m ? ? g z m 0 O m 0 cQ t2 ? Op U Yl? z z o I z w? °d? ¦¦¦¦¦ MENEM x TYP. PARKING LEVEL 2 A-2a DATE: 1/21/2005 ORIGINAL .- MAR 10 2005 74. P04 r4:i 9' -0 ==L FLOORS 6 THRU 14 R FLOOR ? - - - _ rS e ? - GOVERED WALKWAY PLAZA P5 -aa° -?a° ?_ ao -sue -ar -ter -? -mr ar ?r -®r ?? I P'ti J PLAZA J e PLAZA -ter 1 -u- ¦ -sa- 1 -sr ¦ -w- 1 --r- ¦ -w- 1 -air ¦ -car 1 -argr 3 mom 1 mm TRAN51ENT AGGOMMODATION UNIT5 FLOORS 6-14 NO 13th) ®23/FL. X 8 FLOORS = 184 ROOMS FLOOR 5 ® 33/FL. X I FLOOR = 33 ROOMS TOTAL = 21-1 ROOMS 51TE AREA = 1.859 ACRES 51TE DENSITY = 116.129 UNITS/ACRE JOB NUMBER: 10404100 d 0 o m °J 3 ? z U •p O C m o ?m y 00 V o C; ? m m zz0?i aJ m m ? Z ¦¦¦om ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦oao¦ 9 g r.a TRAN51ENT AGGOMMODATION AREA5 WW 0 FLOORS 6-14 MO 13th) OG SF,/FL. X 8 FL.S = 101,154 SF. FLOOR 5 11.906 SF. + 6582 SF. = 18.488 5F. TOTAL GRO55 HEATED = 125,642 5F. FLOOR 5 PLAZA AREA = 11,712 5F. z a RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL FLOOR 5 FLOOR PLANS 33 ROOMS -O A-3 RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLANS SCALE = 3/32" = '-O" DATE: 1/21/2005 ORIGINAL JOB NUMBER: 104041D0 I • a r ?, 1. G °o PJ SEE PROPOSED SIGNAGE m z PACKAGE PROPOSAL MAR 10 2005 0 m NEW CORNICE TREATMENT m v y ° t NAME, COLOR NUMBER 3 C NEWCORdICETREATMENT HOTEL {A' "„*„+? r,.-,-... 00 COLOR NUMBER 3 PL,'+1'1 ° °o °o v t. STUCCO EXTERIOR wj d ` `?? 1 ?? vcti COLOR NUMBER I cl, ?? "*' _?.? 0] av Y m STUCCO EXTERIOR •• • • `• •' z z o a `? COLOR NUMBER I ............ ............._.._._.................. __.. _..... v ,7 m 4 go Z Re m: v STUCCO EXTERIOR ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ COLOR NUMBER 2 ¦ ¦ ¦ - ¦¦¦¦¦ DATE Descavnox 100HEIGHT LINE .................. ................... ...................... ........................... ...... ... ..................... STUCCO EXTERIOR Qo. o ?. 7 COLOR NUMBER 2 W LL NEW CORNICE TREATMENT NEW CORNICE TREATMENT COLOR NUMBER 3 ppppCCC? A COLOR NUMBER 3 DECORATIVE QUOINS DECORATIVE QUOINS COLOR NUMBER 1 COLOR NUMBER I STUCCO EXTERIOR STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER 2 COLOR NUMBER 2 NEW FLAGPOL GPOLES REPLACE EXISITING SERVICE NEW CORNICE TREATMENT AREA SCREENS AND GATES COLOR NUMBER 3 RENOVATED PORTE GOGHE COLOR NUMBERI ?????? ? EXISTING wow bm Q DECK ENTRY ® ®® :f 9 NEW PEDESTAL SIGN EASP V ?nON SEE SIGNAGE PACKAGE EAST ELEVATION - VIEW FROM GULF VIEW BLVD. A_4 DATE: 112112005 ORIGINAL MAR 1 0 1005 Pii` ern ..., ..? ?,'.,? ? s,,•-.? nq.? ?T Z. i ? JOB NUMBER: / ta«.?. •.. .. .. .. ..1 104041DO ST CCO EXTERIOR ti .............. .............. COLOR NUMBER I m NEW CORNICE TREATMENT "d z ........ ............ ............... ............... COLOR NUMBER 3 v o NEW CORNICE TREATMENT o m COLOR NUMBER 3 STUCCO EXTERIOR d o x _ ____ COLOR MAIBER2 ...... m 510000 EXTERIOR L co COLOR NU`IBER I 570000 EXTERIOR °o o E } COLOR LAMER I n m STUCCO EXTERIOR EXISTING GLAZING m m o 6° N COLOR NUMBER 2 AND HANDRAILS m a? zzoGi m m ? _ Z n-ov' 111111111111111 IIIILJIIIIII?111111111 ¦¦¦¦¦ 1 ....:........ .. ............... ¦ ¦ ¦ a DAIS DE6CNPTIDN STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER 2 .......I........ NEW CORNICE TREATMENT NEW CORNICE TREATMENT COLOR NUMBER 3 - - - - - - - - - - COLOR NUMBER 3 F r 1 FT 1 m m FT 1 F F 1 FT 1 FT 1 FT 1 FT 1 m DECORATIVE QUOINS Q COLOR NUMBER I r? .•?..?? [ te STUCCO EMERIOR COLOR N EER 2 r DECORATIVE QUOINS NEW CORNICE TREATMENT COLOR NUMBER I COLOR NUMBER 3 STUCCO E T I STUCCO EXTERIOR X OR ER COLOR NMER 2 COLOR NUMBERR 2 REPLACE AWNING FABRIC WITH NEW NE CORNICE TREA - . . COLOR 3 ? [r] r RENOVATED FORTE COCHE NEW PEDESTAL SIGN I AND ENTRANCE AREA NEW CORNICE- COLOR NO RECTIKI BAR GTED SEE SIGNAGE PACKAGE . STUCCO EXT.- COLOR NO.2 COLOR NUMBER I 8 NORTH[ ELEVATION - VIEW FROM PUBLIC BEACH "am > ON A-5 DATE: 1/11/2005 Z VRMW\I WM)\I3lonine\Oxs\AS-EI.v-xarN.U.e Aatle2 uv 09, 3005 - 2:1- ev ramN ORIGINAL M 10 2005 STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER I NEW CORNICE TREATMENT 704 4D4: 10404190 NEW CORNICE TREATMENT COLOR NUMBER 3 COLOR NUMBER 3 STUCCO EXTERIOR $ STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER I m COLOR NUMBER I ........................................ ....................................................... -. STUCCO EXTERIOR STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER 2 m 0 COLOR NUMBER I d N 00 0 00 IS STUCCO EXTERIOR c COLOR NUMBER 2 -- m ooa?m ZZO ? I Z maw U. 0 -N Q Y?aa ?O O STUCCO EXTERIOR ..................................... ...................... g COLOR NUMBER 2 0 ............................................ NEW CORNICE TREATMENT a. NEW CORNICE TREATMENT COLOR NUMBER 3 COLOR NUMBER 3 DECORATIVE QUONS DECORATIVE QUOINS 0 o COLOR NUMBER I COLOR NUMBER 1 to?c STUCCO EXTERIOR STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER 2 COLOR NUMBER 2 REPLACE EXISTING ld c W FABRIC AWNING NEW CORNICE TREATMENT COLOR NUMBER 3 IT - Wwr &MAMOM RENOVATED FORTE COCNE EXISTING POOLDECK COLOR NUMBER I WEST ELEVATION - VIEW FROM THE GULF A-6 DATE: V71/2005 vi.it.e. - 09. mas 2 .amm n...?a STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER I NEW CORNICE TREATMENT COLOR NUMBER 3 STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER I O STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER 2 STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER 2 EW CORNICE TREATMENT COLOR NUMBER 3 DECORATIVE QUOINS COLOR NUMBERI STUCCO EXTERIOR. COLOR NUMBER 2 REPLACE ALINING FABRIC WITH NEW-'-,i RIGINAL SOUTH ELEVATION i MAR 0 2005 P LYR"" ar 777 , r 1. NEW CORNICE TREATMENT COLOR NUMBER 3 STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER 2 STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER I EXISTING GLAZING AND HANDRAILS of -Y o g ............ _g o o NEW CORNICE TREATMENT COLOR NUMBER 3 g DECORATIVE QUOINS & COLOR NUMBER 1 STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER 2 NEW SERVICE AREA GATES AM SCREENS SERVICE AREA SOUTH GULFVIEW AND LOADING BLVD. JOB NUMBER: 104041.00 G of v IZ U 0 m m d 0 0 W m z °o 3 z ?ma OpF ooa'«r?°i zzo?i Fa Ondw i¦:¦i ppyy ? A 44 ??ow un SOUTH ELEV11014N A-7 DATE: U21/1005 z:\.aw04V0w 7\121 lU\oo..\17-o.,- l.e.y nouns - w. -5 - z.o nr - if NIL.FS BOLTON ASSOCLATFS ¦¦¦ \RI; ONE ADAM'S MARK HOTEL ¦¦¦ 1,,1';D {1P! 11+.?.IIIfLYflgtP ?,r.,,i??"•,??:,,i? ¦¦¦ I' II RIo)R DI SI(-N GULFVIEW BOULEVARD Clearwater Beach, Florida ORIGINAI MAR 01005 DEPAR PAE VOF (B r n-- v Tr' • r j i J" r..-t0'SIDESETBACK _ 1 i i , i j "I Z ?I rl 5I yl i i i i i i I ? I f ? r i , , Y' O r' ? U F I I.y ? s, w , ? a LL_ BEACH ARBORS PUBLIC PARKI,%JG ENTRANCE SIGN A a W ORIGINAL D I a RE C E MAR i 0 2005 CITY OF CF €X4),vV,%3j'_:R 20' Id' 0' II' 20' 40' ,I I I NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES 065 \RlIII1bTURF OEM LV\DS(. UUE \Rt HITi-CRCRI men ONE tPI(W!)P? ,v ¦on ADAM'S MARK HOTEL GULFVIEW BOULEVARD Clearwater Beach, Florida • STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER I NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES nag 1R(mmrtRi 11?1)Sl \f'I 1R( Nlll.( tURI??`??????' on I ?. FI RIOR DI i16 son v, ¦a¦ COLOR PALETTES ??h C eU?S ORIGINAL PLAI?a W'", DEPA TNIENT CITY CE CL.€",`j' T2 ? STUCCO EXTERIOR COLOR NUMBER 2 CORNICE TREATMENT COLOR NUMBER 3 AWNING FABRIC FOR CANOPY ROOF ADAM'S MARK HOTEL GULFVIEW BOULEVARD Clearwater Beach, Florida 0 0 f 1 rA OEM l i. ONE I)?l 41'i \Rc Flllf (Tl4t.l Sam h`FI son Itililai+R(l?ilf.N ADAM'S MARK HOTEL GULFVIEW BOULEVARD Clearwater Beach, Florida 0 vp ..,,4ry .: _.4: All -ORIGINAL ECF7_11 : ?.. MAR 10 2005 .,AC"77. -Z ITV OF CL::v- WW,,?^?j TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND PARKING STUDY FOR ADAM'S MARK CLEARWATER, FLORIDA RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWVATER PREPARED FOR: MSPA ACQUISITIONS II, LP ORIGINAL PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. REVISED MARCH 2005 PROJECT # 04-086 Robert Pergoli CP AICP #9023 r I. INTRODUCTION Due to hurricane damage in Autumn 2004, the Adam's Mark Hotel located at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard is renovating the property to restore the hotel. No hotel rooms will be added and the building footprint will not be changed, and the lobby restaurant will be renovated to contain 5,300 square feet. Additional landscaping will be provided and the renovation of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in Tourist "T" zoning district, and per Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code has a minimum parking requirement of 1 space per room. The restaurant is located in the lobby of the resort hotel, has operated for several years, and is an ancillary use to the hotel primarily serving guests. According to strict interpretation of the code, the parking requirement is 217 spaces. This application requires an assessment of the traffic impacts of development and it was determined a parking study should be completed. Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The property has frontage on South Gulfview Boulevard between Fifth Street and Hamden Drive. (See Figure 1) South Gulfview Boulevard is a three lane collector roadway running along Clearwater Beach. Hamden Drive intersects with South Gulfview Boulevard at a signalized intersection. Traffic counts conducted in November 2004 at the South Gulfview Boulevard / Hamden Drive intersection were excerpted from the Clearwater Grande Traffic Impact Study and were used to establish base conditions. Traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. According to the traffic counts South Gulfview Boulevard carries 1,151 vehicles east of Hamden Drive, and 584 vehicles adjacent to the site. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. The intersection was analyzed using the HCS software. The HCS printout is included in Appendix A. Presently the signalized intersection at South Gulfview Boulevard / Hamden Drive operates at LOS B with average delay being 12.5 seconds per vehicle. South Gulfview Boulevard functions as major city (non-state) roadway and according to FDOT 2002 QLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacity of 1,460 vehicles per hour since it has a continuous center turn lane. South Gulfview Boulevard presently operates at LOS D during the peak hour. RECENED MAR 29 2005 ORIGINAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OFCLEARWp1Elt t N N.T.S i a 0 a 0 0 0 rn LL m 3 a z 0 LL a om m? of 0 d v= 0 =o Y b m O? ? r a E4 and ?a ?r Z? I Q RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PROJECT NO: PROJECT LOCATION - ADAMS MARK HOTEL 04-086 DATE: FIGURE: Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting 1/2005 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. ORIGINAL "Nt # 430 PROJECT LOCATION 0 a W ?7 w rA N d.T.S y V 303 558~ -RECEIVED 27 MAR 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OFCLEARWATER PROJECT NO: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (2004) 04-086 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 1 2005 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. ORIGINAL III. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS As per the approved methodology, existing traffic was adjusted by a 1.5% annual growth rate to the expected build-out year of 2006 to account for background traffic from other nearby redevelopment projects. Also included are the impacts of the proposed Clearwater Grande redevelopment. All parking is presently provided and will continue to be provided within the structure, with the exception of a few spaces near the porte-cochere. The on-site restaurant is accessible only from the lobby and ITE trip rates include the effects of a restaurant located within hotels. Using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 7 Edition rates, the amount of new trips was calculated and estimates are shown below: TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Land Use Amount Daily Trips PM Peak Trip Resort Hotel 217 Occ. Rooms 1,936 106(46/60) The vehicular access will be taken from South Gulfview Boulevard. and the expected distribution is as follows: 60% to / from the north (64) 40% to / from the south (42) PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS Project Road Segment Lanes Project Trips Capacity Percent South Gulfview (Hamden - Site) 2LD 42 1460 2.88% South Gulfview (Site - Coronado) 2LD 64 1460 4.38% Future operations at the South Gulfview Boulevard / Hamden Drive signalized intersection would continue at LOS B with average delay increasing to 12.9 seconds per vehicle. At the project driveway, northbound left turns into the site would operate at LOS A, and vehicles exiting the site would operate at LOS B.. With background traffic from the Clearwater Grande and project traffic added, South Gulfview Boulevard would carry 1,278 vehicles east of Hamden Drive and 687 vehicles adjacent to the site. This represents LOS D and LOS C conditions respectively on a three-lane collector road, which demonstrates acceptable operations. Future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, and the HCS rintouts are included in Appendix B. XE HVED ORIGINAL MAR 29.2005 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT. CITY OF CLEARWATER A N N.T.S 0 0 a m LL 0 u u QLL K O Uti q i mti C % Ell ?v od o? a» =o f? d v w 5n ?t 3a Z? as m s o rn l? 1 0? N ?+I 1 36 24 369 284 f 653 PROCT NO: FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (2006) 04-086 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 1/2005 3- DRAWN BY: G.J.S. 375 - 40% 28 625 - 347 - 0 WEN/ED MAR 2 9 2005 IV. PARKING STUDY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAIER The Adam's Mark is located at 430 South Gulf-view Boulevard and has long been a tourist destination hotel. The resort hotel contains 217 hotel rooms and a restaurant / cocktail lounge in the lobby. The site is located in the Tourist (T) zoning district, and per Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code has a minimum parking requirement of 1 space per room. The-restaurant is not required to be counted separately. According to strict interpretation of the code, the existing hotel would require 217 parking spaces, therefore an apparent deficit exists. The existing parking supply is 201 spaces, 16 spaces below the code requirement. The code provides for reducing the required number of parking spaces to recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater Beach. Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code allows a reduction in parking if the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or adequate parking is available through existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the property. City of Clearwater staff has recognized the Adam's Mark is located directly on Clearwater Beach, and that much like the Clearwater Beach Hotel, as well as the Hilton, provides airport shuttle service and on-demand limo service for its guests. In addition, the Jolley Trolley stops directly in front of the hotel. The restaurant attracts customers primarily from the hotel itself as well as nearby hotels/motels and residential condominiums within walking distance. The parking lot is a private lot reserved for hotel guests. This parking analysis was prepared to determine the availability of parking spaces in the adjacent public parking lot and on South Gulfview Boulevard. Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. It was agreed GCC would conduct a parking accumulation study on a Friday from IOAM to 4 PM, and 6 PM to 10 PM, Saturday from 10 AM to 4 PM and 6 PM to 10 PM, Sunday from 10 AM to 4 PM and 6 PM to 9 PM. The study area included Municipal Lot #32S, which contains 183 parking spaces (including 2 handicap accessible spaces) and on-street parking on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard between the Adam's Mark Hotel and South Beach Pavilion (29 metered spaces). V. EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONS ORIGINAL Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot counts between the hours of 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM on Friday January 21st, 2005, Saturday January 22nd, 2005 between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM, and Sunday January 23rd, 2005 between 10:00 • ORIGINAL • MAR 29 2005 PLANIdNdG DEPARTMENT CI1Y OF CLEARWAIER AM and 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM and 9:00 PM. Weather conditions were typical for mid-January with a high temperatures of 70 degrees and low temperatures of 45 degrees with clear skies. A light rain was encountered at 9:30 PM Saturday evening. The parking lot was checked on the hour for the number of spaces that were occupied. The number of occupied spaces was noted and an hourly accumulated total was obtained. Friday January 21 st, 2005 Parking demand did not vary significantly throughout the day with 5 occupied spaces (2%) at 10 AM to a peak demand of 58 occupied spaces (27%) at 3 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 154 unused spaces in the study area throughout the study period. Table 1 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 4 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. Saturday January 22nd, 2005 Parking demand did not vary significantly throughout the day from a low of 4 occupied spaces (2%) at 10 AM to a peak demand of 42 occupied spaces (20%) at 3 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 170 unused spaces throughout the study period. Table 2 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 5 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. Sunday January 23rd, 2005 Sunday was characterized by below normal temperatures (high of 55 degrees) and breezy conditions. Parking demand in the study area was extremely low throughout the day with a low of 3 occupied spaces (1%) at 10 AM, and a peak demand of 20 occupied spaces (9%) at 2 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 192 unused spaces throughout the day. Table 3 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 6 provides a graph of the hourly parking space occupancy. VI. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT The property contains 201 on-site parking spaces. The hotel would require 217 parking spaces according to strict interpretation of the code. Assuming the worst case, a minimum of 154 public parking spaces would be available to satisfy peak demand upon reopening of the hotel. VII. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates traffic 4 operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways would continue at acceptable levels of service and the traffic impact is minimal. This analysis also demonstrates of the 212 public parking spaces available off-site, a maximum of 58 were occupied during any hour of the study period. As such, the hotel and restaurant parking demands are satisfied although on-site parking supply is 16 spaces below code requirements. With on-site parking supply of 201 spaces and the proximity to public parking and alternative modes of transportation, the parking demands can easily be accommodated. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 2 g 2005 Cily NpF CD?RIEp1NTNM'EER 5 • TABLE 1 FRIDAY JANUARY 21, 2005 TIME 10:00 AN 11:00 AN 12:00 PN 1:00 PN 2:00 PN 3:00 PN 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM Municipal Lot #32S Gulfview On Street TOTAL TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC. SPACES % OCCUPIED 3 183 2 29 5 212 2% 6 183 4 29 10 212 5% 15 183 7 29 22 212 10% 26 183 18 29 44 212 21% 30 183 15 29 45 212 21% 38 183 20 29 58 212 27% 32 183 19 29 51 212 24% 13 183 12 29 25 212 12% 14 183 10 29 24 212 11% 7 183 15 29 22 212 10% 7 183 14 29 21 212 10% 9 183 5 29 14 212 7% ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF WARWATER 220 200 180 160 co 140 w v N 120 0 w a- 100 V U 0 80 60 40 20 0 FIGURE 4 - FRIDAY JANUARY 21, 2005 F i i l 3 E i I 1 -+- series1 • C3 a m z o?2 m = 0 0 r- 0 M C-n ° m m .-, ;a z TIME 10:00 AN 11:00 AN 12:00 PN 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM • TABLE 2 SATURDAY JANUARY 22, 2005 • RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL Municipal Lot #32S Gulfview On Street TOTAL TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC. SPACES % OCCUPIED 2 183 2 29 4 212 2% 6 183 2 29 8 212 4% 12 183 9 29 21 212 10% 17 183 12 29 29 212 14% 19 183 20 29 39 212 18% 20 183 22 29 42 212 20% 15 183 14 29 29 212 14% 14 183 19 29 33 212 16% 11 183 12 29 23 212 11% 8 183 13 29 21 212 10% 6 183 10 29 16 212 8% 6 183 4 29 10 212 5% FIGURE 5 - SATURDAY JANUARY 22, 2005 220 200 180 160 U) 140 w V a y 120 0 w 100 V 0 80 60 40 20 ?tlN191?0 U -*- Series1 I 0 "v n Oz D G) 00 IT1 P; rn c? N a? Q ?m v 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TIME OF DAY TABLE 3 SUNDAY JANUARY 23, 2005 TIME 10:00 AN 11:00 AN 12:00 PN 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Municipal Lot #325 Gulfview On Street TOTAL TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC TOTAL OCC. SPACES % OCCUPIED 1 183 2 29 3 212 1% 2 183 2 29 4 212 2% 2 183 4 29 6 212 3% 4 183 7 29 11 212 5% 7 183 13 29 20 212 9% 5 183 10 29 15 212 7% 9 183 8 29 17 212 8% 11 183 5 29 16 212 8% 3 183 8 29 11 212 5% 3 183 1 29 4 212 2% 3 183 2 29 5 212 2% 0 6) R FIGURE 6 - SUNDAY.JANUARY 23, 2005 220 200 180 160 w 140 w v a 120 0 w 100 v v 0 80 60 40 20 0 ?VWONO jf S 1 g 4 s 3 I i -s series1 • n z m oz n Q) mom N a ° m ?z v H RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL "PE"IXA A • • Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting .Engineering .Planning.1ransportatiou .Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 'hone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 January 3, 2005 Mr. Paul Bertels, Traffic Division Director City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, #220 Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Adams Mark Hotel (#430 S. Gulfview Blvd.) Dear Mr. Bertels: RMCEVED MAR 9 9 2065 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL Per my telephone discussion with Chip Gerlock I am proposing the following methodology for conducting the traffic and parking study for the above-referenced project. Renovations will be made to the existing 217 room resort hotel. The site contains 203 spaces, (most within the garage) however the hotel has been closed since October due to hurricane damage. According to code the requirement is one space per room. This would require a minimum of 217 spaces according to Section 2-802 of the Clearwater City Code. It is my contention that the internal restaurant and meeting rooms are ancillary to the hotel and do not require separate parking space calculations. Traffic Study Existing conditions will be established by utilizing the PM peak period turning movement counts at the S. Gulfview Boulevard/Hamden Road intersection that were conducted in November 2004 for the Clearwater Grande Traffic Impact Study and Parking Study. Existing conditions will be analyzed using HCS software and FDOT generalized tables and software. As was required for the Clearwater Grande, a 1.5% background traffic growth rate will be included. Trip generation estimates will be made using ITE Trip Generation, 7 h Edition Land Use Code 330 (Resort Hotel) and will be distributed to the roadway system as follows: 40% south 60% north Future conditions at the signalized intersection, adjacent roadway segment and project driveway will be reanalyzed. Parking Study As discussed with Mr. Gerlock I propose the parking study will be conducted exactly the way we did the Clearwater Grande Parking Study except. that on-site spaces will not be counted since the hotel is closed and therefore not generating any parking demand. Parking accumulation will be observed at hourly intervals in the municipal lots Friday 6 PM to 10 PM , Saturday 10 AM to 4 PM and 6PM to 10 PM Sunday 10 AM to 4 PM and 6 PM to 9 PM The number of occupied spaces and percent capacity utilization will be recorded and noted in a written report As you prefer the Traffic Impact Study and Parking Study will be combined into one written document for ease in review. Three copies will be submitted with the application. We would like to proceed with the study as soon as possible to submit by the January 31, 2005 deadline. As requested by Mr. Gerlock please contact me to arrange a scoping meeting. Sincerely, , ?•,?-? ,. Robert Per go ' P lam, ? Cc: Chip Gerlock Dan Meacham Mike Kubick Tim Johnson 04-086 RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 PW4NING DERWATEM ER CITY OF C ORIGINAL ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 5246090 January 13, 2005 Mr. Bennett Elbo, Traffic Engineer City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, #220 Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Adams Mark Hotel (#430 S. Gulfview Blvd.) Dear Mr. Elbo: Per our meeting held January 11, 2005 and my follow-up telephone discussion with Chip. Gerlock 1 am submitting this revised methodology for conducting the traffic and parking study for the above-referenced project Traffic Study The traffic study methodology proposed in my January 3, 2005 letter was modified to include the impacts of the Clearwater Grande project (#655 S. Gulf-view Boulevard) as background traffic. Parking Study As discussed with Mr. Gerlock the parking study methodology will be revised to include the hours as shown below: Friday 10 AM to 4 PM and 6 PM to 10 PM Saturday 10 AM to 4 PM and 6PM to 10 PM Sunday 10 AM to 4 PM and 6 PM to 9 PM Since y, y2 Robert Pergohzzi, Cc: Chip Gerlock Dan Meacham Mike Kubick Tim Johnson 04-086 RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL Detailed Report • • Page 1 of 2 HCS2000T" DETAILED REPORT General Infonnation Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 1112105 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection S. GULFVIEW/HAMDEN Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Analysis Year 2004 EXISTING Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R LR Volume, V (vph) 27 303 248 345 255 6 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A), A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 120 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Ti i G= 7.0 G= 24.0 G= G= G= 17.0 G= G= G= m ng Y=4 Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 60.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 28 319 261 237 274 Lane group capacity, c 613 1087 745 633 502 v/c ratio, X 0.05 0.29 0.35 0.37 0.55 Total green ratio, g/C 0.58 0.58 0.40 0.40 0.28 Uniform delay, di 5.6 6.3 12.6 12.7 18.2 fi7P•//(-'•\TlnrnmPntco/7f?an?a/7(1Qe?ttinac\rnaranli??i t;(•'('.\7.nr.ala/,.7f1?Pffinac\T?mn\.c7k9A 1/1'?/'?(1(15 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.15 Incremental delay, d2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.2 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 5.6 6.4 12.8 13.1 19.5 Lane group LOS A A B B B Approach delay 6.4 13.0 19.5 Approach LOS A B B Intersection delay 12.5 X = 0.38 Intersection LOS B HCS2006T M ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e fiiP //f \1??nnmPntc°,%?(;anr3%?(1fiPttinu?\rnPranli??i ---- 1/12/2005 rt Date: Nov/08/2004 rida Department of Transportation 0 • . Transportation Statistics Office 2003 Peak Season Factor Category Report gELLAS COUNTYWIDE :egory: 1500 Week Dates SF PSCF 1 01/01/2003 - 01/04/2003 1.05 1.12 2 01/05/2003 - 01/11/2003 1.05 1.12 3 01/12/2003 - 01/1812003 1.05 1.12 4 01/19/2003 - 01/25/2003 1.03 1.10 5 01/2612003 - 02/01/2003 1.00 1.06 6 02/02/2003 - 02/082003 0.98 1.04 * 7 02/092003 - 02/152003 0.96 1.02 * 8 02/162003 - 02/22/2003 0.95 - 1.01 * 9 02/23/2003 - 03/012003 0.94 1.00 * 10 03/02/2003 - 03/082003 0.93 0.99 * 11 03/092003 - 03/152003 0.93 0.99 * 12 03/162003 - 03/22/2003 0.93 0.99 * 13 03/23/2003 - 0329/2003 0.93 0.99 * 14 03/30/2003 - 04/052003 0.93 0.99 * 15 04/062003 - 04/122003 0.93 0.99 * 16 04/132003 - 04/19/2003 0.94 1.00 * 17 04/202003 - 04/26/2003 0.95 1.01 * 18 04/272003 - 05/032003 0.96 1.02 * 19 05/042003 - 05/102003 0.97 1.03 20 05/112003 - 05/172003 0.98 1.04 21 05/182003 - 05/242003 0.99 1.05 22 05/252003 - 05/312003 0-99 1.05 23 06/012003 - 06/072003 1.00 1.06 24 06/08/2003 - 06/14/2003 1.00 1.06 25 06/152003 - 0621/2003 1.01 1.07 26 06222003 - 0628/2003 1.00 1.06 27 06292003 - 07/052003 1.00 1.06 28 07/06/2003 - 07/12/2003 1.00 1.06 29 07/132003 - 07/19/2003 1.00 1.06 30 07202003 - 07/262003 1.00 1.06 31 07272003 - 08/02/2003 1.00 1.06 32 08/032003 - 08/09/2003 1.01 1.07 •33 08/102003 - 08/16/2003 1.01 1.07 34 08/172003 - 08232003 1.02 1.09 35 0824/2003 - 08/302003 1.03 1.10 36 08/31/2003 - 09/062003 1.04 1.11 37 09/07/2003 - 09/132003 1.04 1.11 38 09/142003 - 0920/2003 1.05 1.12 39 09212003 - 09/272003 1.04 1.11 40 0928/2003 - 10/04/2003 1.04 1.11 41 10/052003 - 10/11/2003 1.03 1.10 42 10/122003 -10/182003 1.02 1.09 43 10/192003 - 10252003 1.03 1.10 44 10/262003 - 11/01/2003 1.03 1.10 45 11/02/2003 - 11/08/2003 1.04 1.11 46 111092003 - 11/150030 1.04 1.11 47 11/162003 - i 1AM' 063' 1.04 1.11 48 11/232003 - 11/292003 1.05 1.12 49 11/302003 - 12/06/2003 1.05 1.12 50 12/072003 - 12/132003 1.05 1.12 51 12/142003 - 12202003 1.05 1.12 52 12/212003 - 12/272003 1.05 1.12 53 12/28/2003 - 12/31/2003 1.05 1.12 MOCF = 0.94 RECEVED, TABLE 4 - 4 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR TWO-WAY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S MIR ? 9 2005 URBANIZED AREAS* ' ' el AWNING DE: RTNIENT RTM UNINTERRUP T ED FLOW inc13WAYS FREEWAYS CITY OF CLE Level of Service Interchange spacing 2:2 mi. apart Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided 180 620 1,210 1,720 2,370 Lanes A B C D E 4 Divided 1,940 3,140 4,540 5,870 6,670 4 2,310 3,840 5,350 6 510 7 240 6 Divided 2,900 4,700 6,800 8,810 10,010 , , 6 3,580 5,930 8,270 10,050 11,180 STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS 8 4,840 8,020 11,180 13 600 15 130 Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) , , 10 6,110 10,110 14,110 17,160 19,050 Level of Service L Di id d A 12 7,360 12,200 17,020 20,710 23,000 anes e v B C D E 2 Undivided ** 400 1,310 1,560 1,610 Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart 4 Divided 460 2,780 3,300 3,390 * Level of Service 6 Divided 700 4,240 4,950 5,080 *=' Lanes A B C D E 8 Divided 890 5,510 6,280 6,440 *'* 4' 2,050 3,350 4,840 6,250 7,110 Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) 6 3,240 5,250 7,600 9,840 11,•180 8 4,420 7 160 10 360 13 420 15 240 Level of Service , , , , 10 5,600 9,070 13,130 16 980 19 310 Lanes Divided A B C D 2 Undivided ** 180 E , , 12 6,780 10,980 15,890 20,560 23,360 1,070 1,460 1,550 4 Divided 390 2,470 3,110 3,270 6 Divided ** 620 3,830 4,680 4,920 BICYCLE MODE 8 Divided ** 800 5,060 6,060 6,360 (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists Lam/ Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not i hi using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number T w t n primary city central business district of an of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) urbanized area over 750,000) Paved Shoulder Level of Service Bicycle Lane Level of Service t,J Lanes Divided A B C D E Coverage A B C D E ?- 2 Undivided *' ** 500 1,200 ** 1,470 0-49% ** ** 310 D >1 3 0 4 Divided ** 1,180 2,750 3,120 >39 * ** 390 50-84% 240 >39 0 6 Divided ** ** 1,850 4,240 4,690 85-100% 300 680 >68 680 *** **¦ 8 Divided ** ** 2,450 5,580 6,060 PEDESTRIAN MODE r Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and within (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway primary city central business district of an urbanized area geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions not number of edestrians over 750,000) , p using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number Level of Service of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided ** " 490 1,310 1,420 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** '* 1,170 2,880 3,010 0-49% *' ** ** 600 1 480 6 Divided ** ** 1,810 4,350 4,520 , 50-84% ** ** ** 940 1 800 8 Divided ** ** 2,460 5,690 5,910 , 85-1000/. ** 210 1,080 >1,080 ** NON-STATE ROADWAYS BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) Major City/County Roadways (Buses per hour) Level of Service (Note: Bush per hourshowa are Daly for the peak hour in the single direction ofhighatraflic flow.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided 870 1,390 1,480 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** ** 2,030 2,950 3,120 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 6 Divided *' ** 3,170 4,450 4,690 _ 85-1000/0 >6 >4 _>3 >2 >1 Q -? 710 1440 ARTERIAL/NON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS Other Signalized Roadways DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED (signalized intersection analysis) (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B Lanes Median Left Turns Lanes Adjustment Factors C D 2 ** ** E 2 Divided Yes +5% Undivided 450 950 1,200 2 Undivided No _20% 4 Divided ** ** 1,050 2,070 2,400 Multi Undivided Yes -5% Source: Florida Department of Transportation 02/22/02 Multi Undivided No -25% Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 ONE-WAY FACILITIES Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 Decease corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 40% to http://wwwI Imyflorida.com/planning/systems/snvlos/default.htm obtain the equivalent doe directional volume for one-way facilities. 'This able does not constitute a standard and should be used only for geaeml planning applications The rwmpater models fmm which this table is detived should be used for mom specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where amts refined teelmiquea exist. Valor shown ate hourly two-way volumes for levels of service and are for the automoblehmek modes unless specifically stated. Level of service letter grade thasholdv are probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisoas should be made with c utiou. Furthumorc, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall madway level of service is not recommended To convert to annual average daily vaffse volumes. there volumes must be divided by an appropriate K factor. The table's input value defaults and level of sctvice criteria appear on the following page. Calevfatioos are based on pinning applications of the Highway Capacity Manuel, Bicycle LOS Model. Pedestrian LOS Model and Tmasit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual respectively for the amonsoblrAmck, bicycle, pedesuiao and bas modes. "'Cannot be achieved ruing table input value defaults. -Not applicable for that level of service lever grade. For ma mobilettruek modes, volumes greater thaa level of service 0 become F because ierevsexion capacities have been reached. For bicycle and Pedestrian modes, the level of service laver grade (including F) is not achievable, because there is no maximum vehicle volume dncsh*W table using mpm value defaaffs. 91 APPENDIX B RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL Land Use: 334 Resort Hotel Description Resort hotels are similar to hotels (Land Use 310) in that they provide sleeping accommodations, restaurants, cocktail lounges, retail shops and guest services. The primary difference is that resort hotels cater to the tourist and vacation industry, often providing a wide variety of recreational facilities/programs (golf courses, tennis courts, beach access, or other amenities) rather than convention and meeting business. Resort hotels are normally located in suburban or outlying locations on larger sites than conventional hotels. One site surveyed in the San Diego area is actually a "motel row" with combined facilities similar to a resort hotel. Hotel (Land Use 310), all suites hotel (Land Use 311), business hotel (Land Use 312) and motel (Land Use 320) are related uses. Additional Data Eleven studies provided information on occupancy rates at the time the studies were conducted. The average occupancy rate for.. these studies was approximately 82 percent. Some properties contained in this land use provided guest transportation services (such as airport shuttles, limousine services, or golf course shuttle service), which may have had an impact on the overall trip generation rates. The sites were surveyed from the 1970s to the 1990s throughout the United States. For all lodging uses, it is important to collect data on occupied rooms as well as total rooms in order to accurately predict trip generation characteristics for the site. Source Numbers 18, 40, 100, 270, 277, 381, 436 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 2 9 20Q5 PL"NWINGD CITY OF CLEgRATER Trip Generation, 7th Edition 615 Institute of Transportation Engineers Hotel ORIGINAL (310) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Rooms On a: Weekday DECEIVED MAR 2 9 2005 Number of Studies: 4 Average Number of Occupied Rooms: 216 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiff(OF CLEARWATER Trip Generation per Occupied Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8.92 4.14 - 17.44 6.04 Data Plot and Equation Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size 4,000 3,000 w 'a c W Q N LU 2,000 m N N Q F- 1,000 0 X ---------- -------- --------- - X 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 X = Number of Occupied Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given ------ Average Rate R2=x+ * Trip Generation, 7th Edition 542 Institute of Transportation Engineers Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Rooms PLANNING DEPARTMENT On a: Weekday, CITY OF CLEARWATER Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: 7 Average Number of Occupied Rooms: 434 Directional Distribution: 72% entering, 28% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.37 0.28 - 0.59 0.61 uata Not anci Equation I 400 300 c W _Q H d U L 200 m a) Q I-- 100 0 X X X X 200 300 400 Soo 600 X = Number of Occupied Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.35(X) + 7.42 700 800 900 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.81 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 617 Institute of Transportation Engineers ORIGIN Resort : Hotel ? RECEIVED (330) MAR 2 9 2005 Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Rooms PLANNING DEPARTMENT On a: Weekday, CITY OF CLEARWATER Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 10 Average Number of-Occupied Rooms: 429 Directional Distribution: 43% entering, 57% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.49 0.27 - 0.72 0.70 Data Plot and Equation 500 N c W O. F- a> LU a) N (0 m Q 400 300 200 F- 100 - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - ---------- - ---- -------- ------ - ----- - ------ X -- ------ --- ---------- ---- ---- -- -- ---- ?- - ---- -X---- - - - - - - - -- - ---- -X' '- - - - - - - - - -?- X - - - .. _ _, .. . - - - - - -,- - - - - - - - - -; - - - - - - - - ; - - - - - - - - ;XX X X. . -- .r'-- _ ---•-- ----- --- --- -- -- ------ •--- ---- ------- ------------- 100 200 300 400 500 600 X = Number of Occupied Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln('r) = 1.13 Ln(X) -1.52 700 800 900 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.88 0 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 618 Institute of Transportation Engineers Detailed Report a I f?i11^snI A I I RK E C E HCS2000- DET AILED REPORT General Information Site Information MAR 2 Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 1114105 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection S. GULFVIEW / HAMDEN Area Type All other areas PLANNING DIED Jurisdiction CLEARWATER F-W OF CLEA R Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITION Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R LR Volume, V (vph) 28 347 284 369 278 6 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 120 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Ti i G= 7.0 G= 24.0 G= G= G= 17.0 G= G= G= m ng Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 60.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 29 365 299 262 299 Lane group capacity, c 580 1087 745 633 502 v/c ratio, X 0.05 0.34 0.40 0.41 0.60 Total green ratio, g/C 0.58 0.58 0.40 0.40 0.28 Uniform delay, di 5.7 6.5 12.9 12.9 18.5 Pagel of 2 ?0 05 ZTMENT MATER file // \T?nnnmPntol7nanio/?(1Qattinac\rne.ronli7.7.i C'TfC'\T.moral%,?(l?PttinQ?\Temn\c?kl'_.. 1/140005 Detailed Report . • Page 2 of 2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.18 Incremental delay, d2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.9 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 5.8 6.7 13.2 13.4 20.5 Lane group LOS A A B B C Approach delay 6.6 13.3 20.5 Approach LOS A B C Intersection delay 12.9 Xc = 0.42 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved RECEINED MAR 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CnY OF CLEARWATER Version 4.1 e ORIGINAL file //f' \T)n?rmPntc°/ 7(1anr1°/?(1CPttinac\rnPra?li??i (TC C \T.ncal%,?IlSe±tinu?\Temn\c2k1 ?_. 1/14/7005 Two-Way Stop Control , PQ 1 of 2 , Lt ti tRIGINAL MAR 19 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY MAIM ARWAIER General Information Site Information nalyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period RP GCC 111412005 PM PEAK HOUR 1 Intersection Jurisdiction nalysis Year A S/ GULF. VIEW / PROJECT DRIVE CLEAR WATER FUTURE CONDITIONS 2006 Project Description East/West Street: ADAMS MARK DRIVEWAY North/South Street: S. GULFVIEW BLVD. Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes an d Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 18 273 0 0 351 28 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 303 0 0 390 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 - -- 0 - -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 36 0 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 40 0 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ' Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 .7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (vph) 20 66 C (m) (vph) 1138 447 lc 0.02 0.15 95% queue length 0.05 0.51 Control Delay 8.2 14.4 LOS A B Approach Delay - - 14.4 pproach LOS - - B fla //(' \lln?nmr?nte?/ ?(lan??/7(lCathinac\rnaranii?Ti f?('.f.\T .n?al?/7(1CPttinac\TPmn\n?kl'I 1 /14/9()() 5 0 46 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting .Engineering .Planning .Transportation Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 February 7, 2005 ORIGINAL REL"MVED Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor Clearwater, FI 33756 Re: Adam's Mark Redevlopment Case No. FLD2005-010051 SGN2005-01016 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida Section 7, Township 29 South, Range 15 East FEB 0 7 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER In response to your Completeness Letter dated February 4, 2005, each of the following comments will be addressed below: 1. A Stormwater Narrative letter dated February 4, 2005, is enclosed addressing this issue. Also enclosed is the copy of SWFWMD Request of No Permit Required Letter dated February 4, 2005. 2. As discussed between Mr. Rick Albee and Mr. Joe Samnik, a Tree Assessment Report has been prepared for this redevelopment. As verified with Mr. Albee, this Tree Assessment report is adequate and will suffice, in lieu of a Tree Inventory, due to the relatively minor scope of work and corresponding insignificant disturbance to existing trees as a result of this work effort. 3. An Irrigation Plan should not be needed since the existing irrigation system should remain substantially intact and as is with possibly a few modifications to be field installed as needed. Enclosed are Fifteen (15) copies of the SWFWMD Request of No Permit Required Letter; Fifteen (15) copies of the Stormwater Narrative; and Fifteen (15) copies of the Tree Assessment Report as prepared by Mr. Joe Samnik, Certified Arborist. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information concerning the Completeness of this Application.. moz§OLETE • February 7, 2005 Page 2 of 2 ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 07 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Principal Cc: Dan Meacham, Niles Bolton Associates, Inc Jayne Sears, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP File 04-086 OBSOLETE Sean P. Cashen, P.E. Gulf Coast Ponsulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting .Engineering -Planning .Transportation .Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 February 7, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor Clearwater, Fl 33756 Re: Adam's Mark Redevlopment Stormwater Narrative Case No. FLD2005-01005 / SGN2005-01016 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida Section 7, Township 29 South, Range 15 East PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Pyramid Advisors, LLC is proposing to renovate and redevelop this existing facility at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida. Our client is proposing to renovate and improve this existing site that was damaged during the hurricanes of last year. As shown on sheet 3, some minor pavement removal and building modifications are proposed in the porte cache / dropoff area in front of the facility. As shown on sheet 4, the front parking area is being modified with additional green space and the design of a handicap space to meet current ADA standards; the entrance to the building is being relocated; additional decorative (utilizing paver bricks) parking is proposed to the west. The amount of pavement area has been reduced from 9,386 sf to 9,111 sf and the amount of green space / open space area has been increased from 7,860 sf to 8,325 sf. The net result is the amount of impervious area has been reduced from 73,157 sf to 72,692 sf as detailed on the Site Data Table. This main entrance and porte cache area currently drain west to east towards Gulfview Boulevard. The proposed improvements will maintain these existing drainage patterns and also drain towards Gulfview Boulevard. Although there are no existing facilities for stormwater retention located onsite, we are proposing to "provide facilities in a manner.... in proportion to the extent to which the site plan or the property is affected or disturbed by the redevelopment" as stated in and consistent with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria. Please realize our client is proposing to renovate, refurbish and improve this existing site that was severely damaged during the hurricanes of last year. These proposed improvements will enhance, beautify and upgrade this facility, while increasing the amount of green space and landscaping and maintaining the pre-existing ORIGINAL K WED FEB f-D)ECE 0 7 2005 ORDwLETE February 7, 2005 Page 2 of 2 drainage patterns. Therefore, a stormwater plan should not be, necessary for this redevelopment. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information concerning this Stormwater Narrative ORIGINAL Sincerely, RECEIVED FEB 0 7 20 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARW Principal Cc: Dan Meacham, Niles Bolton Associates, Inc Jayne Sears, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP File 04-086 OBSOLETE Gulf Coast onsulting, Inc. • Land Development Consulting.Engineering .Planning .Transportation .Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ]COT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727)524-1818. Fax: (727) 524-6090 February 4, 2005. Mr. Richard M. Alt, P.E. Surface Water Permitting Tampa Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 U.S. Highway 301 North Tampa, FL 33637-6759 RE: Adam's Mark Redevelopment 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida Section 7, Township 29 South, Range 15 East Pinellas County, Florida Dear Richard: RECEwED FEB 0.7 2005 DEPARTMENT 0 1 ?91J Pyramid Advisors, LLC is proposing to renovate and redevelop this existing facility at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida. We are enclosing Four (4) copies of the Permit Inquiry Checklist, Four (4) copies of the Boundary Survey, Four (4) copies of the Site Plan, and Four (4) copies of an aerial photograph for this site. There are no wetlands within the project area. Our client is proposing to renovate and improve this existing site that was damaged during the hurricanes last year. As shown on sheet 3, some minor pavement removal and building modifications are proposed in the porte cache / dropoff area in front of the facility. As shown on sheet 4, the front parking area is being modified with additional green space and the design of a handicap space to meet current ADA standards; the entrance to the building is being relocated; additional decorative (utilizing paver bricks) parking is proposed to the west. The amount of pavement area has been reduced from 9,386 sf to 9,111 sf and the amount of green space / open space area has been increased from 7,860 s to 8,325 s£ The net result is the amount of impervious area has been reduced from 73,157 if to 72, kehred sf as detailed on the Site Data Table. We are requesting that you issue a Letter of No ermit for this project. z-7S a-4 S Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information concerning this request for a Letter of No Permit Required. Your prompt attention and response are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your assistance. Principal cc: Dan Meacham, Niles Bolton Associates, Inc Jayne Sears, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Bums, LLP 0 rn ki% ^ QQWLETE 02x06/2005 21:46 72778916 SAMNIK PAGE 02 ,ee onw e OR\G\NAL Mike Kubick, Vice President of Construction Pyramid Project Managem rK LLC 430 South Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, Florida 33767 January 27, 2006 RE: Adam's Mark Tree Assessment Dear Mr. Kubick: RE C?E?%*D Fig n7 2005 ?N? C?EpO1p1ER As you requested, I have inspected the trees at the Adam's Marie hotel located at 430 S Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater Beach, Florida. My assignment was to provide you with information regarding how many trees would be necessarily removed due to construction and which trees would require protection due to construction in accordance with the City of Clearwater's requirements. In my opinion, two (2) Sabal palms (Sabal palmetto) will be necessarily removed due to the addition of a walk which is required by the City of Clearwater. These two (2) subject Sabal palm trees can be and will be mitigated when additional palm trees are installed on the Gulf of Mexico patio elevation in accordance with the proposed landscape plan. It is also my opinion that one (1) multi trunk Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinste) will require protection as the porte cochere is redesigned and expanded. Because this subject Senegal date palm tree is currently located in a raised planter with the current building in close vicinity to the southern elevation of the palm tree trunks, protection will become unusually daunting. I would strongly recommend that construction management develop a strategy that would barricade this subject palm tree from construction damage. The problem defines itself as having no place to secure stakes into the ground to support a barricade for tree protection. The current ground area is covered with a hardscape surface. Mr. Albee of the City of Clearwater will expect to see such a barricade protection detail in your submittal plan. If I may be of any assistance to you regarding the palm tree barricade tasks or any additional arboreal expertise, please advise. 0 St"M L E T E 1015 Micjpn Avenue It Patin Harbor, FL 34683 + (727) 786-8128 4 (727) 789-1697 Fax 02/06/2005 21:46 72778916 SAMNIK PAGE 03 Adam's Mark January 27, 2005 Author: Joseph R. Samnik Carbfied Arborist #SO-0408 Corditd - Bureau of Entomology, #7774 P"s 2 I affirm that my opinions have been made in total good faith, based on the facts presented during my inspection, with no coercion from others. I further affirm that I have no interest with the parties or people involved with this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. My responsibility to Pyramid Project Management, LLC, the City of Clearwater, and Public Trust ends with this report. I have no responsibility to inspect or ensure any or all of the recommendations made in this report are executed, planned, or implemented. This report does not fall under the category of Privileged Information or Confidential Work Product. Sincerely, Joseph R. Samnik JRSIabh ORIGINAL jzracelvrao rr,l WA ERT PLP?NNING pEP CIV OF CLEAR OBSOLETE 0 0 FLD2005-01005 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Date Received: 01/31/2005 ADAMS MARK HOTEL / RADISON ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE : UNK PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet r l C I'TY OF C LEARWA°T E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW April 25, 2005 Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Johnson: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217- room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units are permitted today) and for height to allow the existing 155-foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use with a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to patio/pool decking and tiki bars) and to allow patio/pool decking seaward (westward) of the Coastal Construction Control Line, an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; (3) Reduction to the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval, under the provisions of Section 3-1807 (SGN2005-01016). The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applications with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density and building height per Section 6-109; 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 4. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; 5. Staff proposed signage complies with the Comprehensive Sign Program standards, under the provisions of Section 3-1807; and 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development, and will assist in retaining the community character of the immediate vicinity. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAi. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPI,OYFP" April 25, 2005 Johnson - Page Two Conditions of Approval: 1. That any voluntary demolition of this existing building shall not vest the existing height of 155 feet. Any future reconstruction requires compliance with current Code height requirements; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 3. That the sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 4. That all City approvals and easements necessary for the sidewalk connection for handicap accessibility to the sidewalk on City property to the north be obtained prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion; 5. That prior to the issuance of any permits, site and building plans be revised to show the removal of, and the striping out of, the two southern parking spaces on the west side of the porte cochere as a "no parking" area, acceptable to the Engineering Department; 6. That fencing within the visibility triangles and waterfront visibility triangles be brought into compliance with Code provisions prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. Fence height increases above that otherwise permitted and alternate fence materials shall only be allowed (1) in the waterfront visibility triangle if a letter of "no objection" is submitted from the adjacent condominium association board and (2) in the visibility triangle if acceptable to the Engineering Department; 7. That the City, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion, approve the sidewalk cafe on the west side; 8. That the monument-style freestanding sign not exceed six feet in height, meet a five-foot setback from property lines and include the site address; 9. That all construction comply with FEMA requirements; and 10. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. You are also requested, since the property is more than one platted lot, to record a Declaration of Unity of Title in the public records of Pinellas County within 30 days of the date of this letter. The attached Declaration of Unity of Title document has been prepared for you for signature and recording. The new Declaration of Unity of Title document requires the owners' signature to be witnessed by two persons (whom also must sign the form) and be notarized prior to recording. Once the new Declaration of Unity of Title document is recorded, please submit a copy of the recorded document to Wayne Wells for our records. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (April 19, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. i • April 25, 2005 Johnson - Page Three Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 3, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, chael , Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0430 Adams Mark+Radisson (T) - ApprovedlGulfview S 0430 Development Order.doc PLANNING SPARTMENT y ` y 9 =_ 100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR 9lyArEA??? CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE: 727-562-4567; FAX: 727-562-4865 DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE Property Owner: Property Address: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard KNOW OF ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, being the fee owner (s) of the following described real property situated in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas and State of Florida, to wit: See attached Exhibit "A" do hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions on said lands, hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall hereafter be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an indivisible building site. 2. That the said property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land, and that no portion thereof shall be sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately except in its entirety, as one plot or parcel of land. 3. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as provided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all parties claiming under them until such time as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this at Clearwater, Florida. WITNESSES: - day of , 20 , OWNER (S): STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS (SEAL ABOVE) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by on behalf of whom the instrument was executed. Notary Commission Number: Personally known Type of identification produced Notary Public Signature Name of Notary Printed or produced identification S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development reviewwmty of i ttte ueciaration wvD.ooc EXHIBIT "A" ADAM'S MARK HOTEL RE-DEVELOPMENT SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE IS E LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION: O.R. BOOK 13283, PAGE 2290 A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER . SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED A'S FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33, RUN SOUTH 77'41'16- WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE; RUN THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT (RADIUS-1247.0 FEET ) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET (CHORD- 296.09 FEET, CHORD BEARING- SOUTH 19'07'51 EAST); RUN THENCE NORTH 68'55'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 36; RUN THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS 36,35,34 AND 33, WHICH LINE IS A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS-847.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET (CHORD- 235.0 FEET, CHORD BEARING-NORTH 20'17'10" WEST) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Gulf Coast Consulting,_ Inc. Land Development Consulting 13825 ICOT Blvd., Suite 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 10:45 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FW: Staff Reports for the April 19, 2005, CDB meeting Jayne - Forgot to ask that I need to know whether the conditions for each of the cases are acceptable or not, preferably by 10:00 am on Monday, April 18, 2005. Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 10:32 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: Staff Reports for the April 19, 2005, CDB meeting Jayne - Attached are Staff Reports for the April 19, 2005, Community Development Board (CDB) meeting, beginning at 1:00 pm for the following cases (attorney in parentheses): 1. (Troy Perdue) FLD2004-10076/TDR2004-10014 [Wells, Wayne] 12 Idlewild Street. 2. (Tim Johnson) FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 [Wells, Wayne] 430 South Gulfview Boulevard. 3. (Ed Armstrong) FLD2005-01016/TDR2005-01017/PLT2005-00002 [Wells, Wayne] 715 South Gulfview Boulevard. If you need anything, let me know. Thanks. Wayne Idlewild 12 Staff Gulfview S 0430 Gulfview S 0715 Report for 4... Staff Report.d... Staff Report.d... 1 ( t 0 0 area is full. We cannot move these parking spaces to the west since there is an existing retaining wall and deck area which is to remain. Also realize that the porte cochere area is being improved and expanded which will provide additional parking area for arriving guests and reduce the potential of guests using these overflow parking spaces. These improvements also include the proposed handicap parking space in front of the relocated main entrance. Although at the narrowest point there is 20 feet of back drive aisle behind these parking spaces: • These parking spaces have been used without incident for years. • These spaces, based on the limited amount of area by the porte cochere, are very functional-there is sufficient backout maneuvering area to either side of this porte cochere column. • These spaces will be used on an infrequent basis as overflow parking for arriving guests. • Since the porte cochere area is to be improved and expanded, the need for this overflow parking area will be reduced even further. • These parking spaces are between an existing raised deck and planter area with retaining wall and the support column of the porte cochere overhang-it would be cost-prohibitive to demolish this deck area to expand these parking spaces. [3/29/05 Revision - Based on meetings with City staff, the 4 "check-in" spaces described in this comment, have now been counted as 2 spaces. The applicant has revised its parking space count from 203 to 201, including a submittal of a revised parking study.] Zoning 1. Comment : Need to change Sheet 1/5 of the Civil Plans to indicate the proposed density is 116.7 units/net acre. Revise Exhibit B, Description of Request, under "a" to indicate 74 rooms (40 rooms/acre) area are allowed (not 97), as it is based on the upland acreage. Also revise Exhibit B, Comprehensive Infill criteria #8 response, to also indicate 74 rooms allowed (not 97). Response: Please see the Revised Site Data Table on Sheet 1/5, 15 sets of which are attached. Also attached are 15 sets of a revised Exhibit "B" to Comprehensive Infill Application, which has been corrected to reflect the appropriate number of rooms allowed (74). ? E ED ORIGINAL MAR 2 9 2005 MM4114G DEPAERT C?IY Of CLEAIWT?T 0 0 Response No. 6: The approved methodology for conducting the parking analysis was followed. At DRC it was understood that other projects on the beach are anticipated to provide public parking to replace parking lost to the Beach Walk project. Comment No. 7: Parking Study: Staff has concerns that the study did not give an average occupancy usage of the municipal lot because the study was conducted during the month of January (off peak season) and did not take into account the occupancy usage in the peak seasons. Response No. 7: A "variance" of 16 spaces (217 required vs. 201 provided on- site) is sought. This is a 6% variance. The methodology for doing the study explained we would submit by the January 31, 2005, deadline. The study had to be conducted on the weekend it was done. Comment No. 8: Where will the tour buses, shuttle vans and/or taxis state? Response No. 8: There are no specific provisions for the staging of buses. Shuttle buses, airport limos and taxis will pick up and drop off passengers in the porte-cochere area. Comment No. 9: Provide height of canopy in the porte-cochere area (must meet minimum clear vertical height of 8'2"). Response No. 9: The vertical clearance at the existing porte-cochere exceeds 14' arid is shown on the revised plans. This is not proposed to change. Comment No. 10: Provide dimensions for parking spaces and drive aisles, specifically in the porte-cochere area. Response No. 10: See the revised plans (sheet L.1.2). All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O. PLANNING: Comment No. 1: The property is zoned Tourist District and Open Space/Recreation District. It appears that the zoning line is at the seawall line. Based on your square footage amounts RECEASED of submerged land (25,483 sf; 0.585 acre), the upland area is 1.859 acres. Cannot count submerged land area within MAR 2 9 2005 density calculations. Provide calculations as to upland PLANNING DEPAMENT CITY oFCLEARuunIER 3 ORIGINAL 9 9 Response No. 4: Per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, the assessed value, of the building (without land) is $9,758,000. The estimated costs of the repairs and improvements are still under review and the total amount is not available at this time. Comment No. 5: Is the restaurant an accessory use to the hotel? If so, then no additional parking is required for the restaurant. The hotel has more units (217) than provided parking (217 spaces required; only 203 provided [determined to be 201]). Parking Study needs to address the reduction for the hotel only. Response No. 5: As discussed at DRC, the restaurant is an ancillary use to the resort hotel and therefore, a separate parking calculation for the restaurant is unnecessary. The parking analysis has been revised to assess the required reduction from 217 to 201 parking spaces. Original Comment 5: Parking required for a restaurant in the Tourist District is a range from 7 - 15 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Proposal, including the Site Data Table and the Parking Study, utilizes the seven spaces per 1,000 square feet for analysis and for the parking reduction. This is incorrect. Use the 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet for calculation of required parking and for analysis. Revise the Site Data Table, Sheet A2 (and delta of 94 spaces), the Parking Study and application to indicate 80 spaces required for the restaurant and 297 spaces overall required. Provide justification for the parking reduction down to 203 spaces [determined to be 201 spaces]. Response: As discussed at DRC, the restaurant is an ancillary use to the resort hotel and therefore, a separate parking calculation for the restaurant is unnecessary. Comment No. 6: Unclear how the building/lobby is being remodeled to add a 5,300 square-foot restaurant without adding square footage to the building. What is in the 5,300 square feet now? Response No. 6: The building renovations contemplated at this time include renovations to the existing office and restaurant areas. The plans contemplate the possibility of converting one meeting room into another ancillary restaurant area in the future. Applicable area calculations are listed on sheet A-1 in the documents we submitted. The hotel area is not being increased. U11M CE?VED ORIGINAL MAR 2 9 2005 5 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 Comment No. 7: Parking Study - On Page 3, first paragraph, last sentence, it states that parking will be increased, yet the site plan (Sheet 1/5) indicates that EXISTING and PROPOSED parking is 203 spaces [determined to be 201]. How is parking being increased? Also revise last sentence on Pg 5. Response No. 7: All documents have been revised to reflect 201 parking spaces exist and are proposed and that the code requirement is 217 parking spaces. Comment No. 8: Provide in Site Data Table the total paved area (vehicular use area) that is outside of the parking garage, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet. If greater than 4,000 square feet, must provide at least 10% interior landscape area. Response No. 8: As was noted at DRC, the vehicular use area is being reduced; however both the existing vehicular use area and the proposed vehicular use area are greater than 4,000 square feet. A Comprehensive Landscape Application was filed because interior landscaping is less than 10% of this area. Comment No. 9: If interior landscape area is required, depict by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped area. Response No. 9: The parking lot interior is within a parking garage. See Comprehensive Landscape Program Application. Comment No. 10: Letter to SWFWMD states there will be a reduction of pavement of 275 square feet, with the amount of green space/open space increasing by 465 square feet and the decrease of impervious area by 465 square feet. Where is the 190 square feet reduction of impervious surface occurring? Response No. 10: The reductions in paved areas occur in two places; at the pool deck area where the arbor/foot wash is noted and at the entry to the east of the porte-cochere where the new handicap parking place is called out. Comment No. 11: Unclear on Sheet 1/5 that there is an increase of IMPERVIOUS by 465 square feet, not PERVIOUS. Pervious should be 33,808 sf; impervious should be 72,692 sf. Revise. The calculations have been corrected as shown on the revised Site Data Table. 6 - ORIGINAL FLD2005-01005 430 S. Gulfview Boulevard .-, _, Responses to 3/1610`?'?? " '.® 5 Comments Traffic Engineering Condition MAR 2 4 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Comment: . CITY OF CLEARWATER Disabled parking spaces inside parking garage do not meet current City standards. The disabled parking spaces must be 19' long and be exclusive of the 44" wide accessible route. Suggest providing one H/C space adjacent elevator lobby, three along north wall of garage and two along south wall of garage with accessible aisles connecting all spaces to elevator lobby that do not compel user to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. This would eliminate the need for the accessible route in front of the proposed H/C spaces and allow the spaces to be realigned to meet the dimensional standards. Response : Attached are 15 sets of Sheets A-2a and A-2 which have been revised to reflect re-striping the existing deck to provide 6 accessible spaces which will be located on the second and third levels of the deck and will comply with the space requirements indicated in Mr. Elbo's comments. 2. Comment: The four check-in parking spaces do not meet the City's minimum dimensions. Parking spaces must have a 24-foot wide drive aisle for backout maneuverability. The submitted plan indicates an aisle of 19 feet. Response: At the narrowest point to the rear of these four parking spaces there is approximately 20 feet from the parking stall to the raised curb around the existing support column of the porte cochere overhang. There is in excess of 20 feet to either side of this curb and column which should provide sufficient area needed to back up and maneuver a car to exit these spaces. Please realize that these parking spaces as located are not the typical parking stall with drive aisle configuration. These existing parking spaces-proposed to be resurfaced with decorative pavers-are infrequently used as overflow parking for guests when the porte cochere • • ORIGINAL area is full. We cannot move these parking spaces to the west since there is an existing retaining wall and deck area which is to remain. Also realize that the porte cochere area is being improved and expanded which will provide additional parking area for arriving guests and reduce the potential of guests using these overflow parking spaces. These improvements also include the proposed handicap parking space in front of the 'relocated main entrance. Although at the narrowest point there is 20 feet of back drive aisle behind these parking spaces: • These parking spaces have been used without incident for years. • These spaces, based on the limited amount of area by the porte cochere, are very functional-there is sufficient backout maneuvering area to either side of this porte cochere column. • These spaces will be used on an infrequent basis as overflow parking for arriving guests. • Since the porte cochere area is to be improved and expanded, the need for this overflow parking area will be reduced even further. • These parking spaces are between an existing raised deck and planter area with retaining wall and the support column of the porte cochere overhang-it would be cost-prohibitive to demolish this deck area to expand these parking spaces. Zoning 1. Comment : Need to change Sheet 1/5 of the Civil Plans to indicate the proposed density is 116.7 units/net acre. Revise Exhibit B, Description of Request, under "a" to indicate 74 rooms (40 rooms/acre) area are allowed (not 97), as it is based on the upland acreage. Also revise Exhibit B, Comprehensive Infill criteria #8 response, to also indicate 74 rooms allowed (not 97). Response: Please see the Revised Site Data Table on Sheet 1/5, 15 sets of which are attached. Also attached are 15 sets of a revised Exhibit "B" to Comprehensive Infill Application, which has been corrected to reflect the appropriate number of rooms allowed (74). m "WAD MAR 2 4 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 CITY OF CLEARWATER • 2. Comment : 0 ORIGINAL Parking lot interior landscaping is only required for that vehicular use area OUTSIDE of the parking garage. Ensure the vehicular use area indicated is for that area outside of the garage. Then, if the vehicular use area is over 4,000 square feet, then the Code requires 10% interior landscape area. If this is the case and the site is not meeting the required 10% interior landscape area, what is the amount (square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area) being provided? The Comprehensive Landscape Program application responses should be providing the justification to the percentage being provided and/or why the 10% cannot be provided. Response: The Vehicular Use Area (VUA) is 12,463 sf. The calculated Vehicular Use Interior Landscape Area as shown on revised Sheet 3 is 4,105 sf. This equates to approximately 32.9% of the VUA as detailed on the revised Site Data Table. Accordingly, it does not appear that Comprehensive Landscape Program approval is required. 3. Comment : If interior landscape area is required, depict by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas. Response: The Interior Vehicular Use Landscape Area is shaded on the added Sheet 3 (Proposed Conditions Plan). 4. Comment : Show the required sight and waterfront sight triangles on all appropriate sheets, such as Landscape Plan Sheets 1-1.2 and L2.1. Ensure that fences and landscaping meet the restrictions for sight and waterfront triangles. Response: See revised Sheets 1-1.2 and L2.1 of the Landscape Plans, and added Sheet 3 of the civil drawings, which depict the required sight and waterfront sight r v?` iL L, MAR 2 4 2005 3 PLANNING DEPARTIMENT MY OF CLEARINAi E? 10 ORIGINAL triangles. To the extent any opaque fences exist within the waterfront sight triangles, the fences will be removed. 5. Comment : The application must include in the request any opaque fence higher than four feet within the waterfront sight triangle. If the condominium association next door wants the higher fence, then provide a letter from the condominium association stating they want the higher fence and support the increase to fence height within the visibility triangle. Must provide all relevant justification. Response: All opaque fences will be removed from all waterfront sight triangles. 6. Comment : There is a note at the top of Sheet 1-1.2 near the arbor that says the pool deck is being extended. Either remove the note or provide greater detail and the proposed setback to the proposed extended pool deck and proposed arbor. Response: Please see revised Sheet 1-1.2 which has been corrected to reflect that the existing pool deck is being replaced for a new shower area. The deck is not being extended. 7. Comment : Must address whether Beach Walk improvements are retaining or removing the parking and sidewalk adjacent that you are connecting your handicap route to. If the existing sidewalk is being retained on the City property, then you need to determine whether any easements are necessary with Engineering. Response: Please refer to the note on revised Sheets 3 and "Approximate location of 10' sidewalk to be designed accordance with the Beach Walk design specifications design and construction to be coordinated with the regarding design and construction and the payment in option." i which states the and constructed in Note: Sidewalk City of Clearwater lieu of construction 4 MAR 24 ' 'f`5 PLAT N MG DEPAWiil ENT CRY OF Ct 7AR)MV7.1 8. Comment : 40 ORIGINAL Contact Engineering regarding Beach Walk improvements. Need to determine where the proposed 10-foot wide sidewalk will be installed (you show it partially onto your property), the design specifications (including any street trees and landscaping) and whether you will construct or whether you will pay the City to construct. The sidewalk will need to be for the entire street frontage along S. Gulfview Blvd. Response: Please refer to the note on revised Sheets 3 and 5 which states the "Approximate location of 10' sidewalk to be designed and constructed in accordance with the Beach Walk design specifications. Note: Sidewalk design and construction to be coordinated with the City of Clearwater regarding design and construction and the payment in lieu of construction option." Please see the approximate location of the future sidewalk along the entire frontage of the site as shown on Sheet 3. Also refer to note on Sheet 5 indicating that a Sidewalk Access Easement, if needed, will be procured and executed with the City of Clearwater to provide for our handicap access to the existing 5' wide concrete sidewalk adjacent and north of our site. According to the Beach by Design plans provided to us by the City of Clearwater, it appears this existing sidewalk is to remain as a pedestrian access from Gulf Boulevard to the beach. 9. Comment : Sheet 1_1.2 states a new canopy structure is to be placed on the west side of the building, but the only architectural plans don't indicate it as new. Which is it? Is the canopy there now and it is only being recovered with new awning material? Response: Please see revised Sheet 1-1.2 which was revised to indicate "replacement of existing awning fabric." 10. Comment : The hedge is a nice improvement and is encouraged. Instead of the response given, strongly suggest someone on the applicant's team talk to Engineering to seek permission to plant the hedge on the City's property. _ MAR 2 4 2005 5 PLAMIMINC DEPAWFAMR, CIVY 0 F CL 2ARINAi =y: ORIGINAL Response: Please see Sheet L2.1 which was revised to remove the hedge material from the City's property. 11. Comment : Include as a condition of approval to comply with the Sidewalk Cafe Code requirements and file a new application with building permits. Response: As we indicated at the time of resubmittal, since the cafe will not open for some time, all of the necessary floor plan information is not available at this time. Making the sidewalk cafe application a condition of approval as described in this comment is acceptable to the applicant. 12. Comment : Unclear if I am missing something or what. I do not find the CSP revised to match the sign design shown on Sheet 4/5. Revise either Sheet 4/5 or the CSP. Response: Please see the proposed location of the monument sign (as described in the CSP application) depicted on Sheet L.1.2. The alternate sign configuration on Sheet 4/5 of the civil drawings is not requested and has been removed from the plans. 13. Comment : Maximum height of freestanding sign in the Tourist District is six feet (not 6'8"). Revise response to #2 - Height on Page 3 of the application. Response: The proposed monument sign is six feet in height. Attached are 15 sets of the revised CSP application including a corrected Page 3. 14. Comment : Provide colors of signs (freestanding, attached and directional). Still need to provide color drawings, not black and white. 6 MAR 2 4 2005 PEANZ ?+G Response: ORIGINAL The attached 15 sets of the CSP application include color renderings of the attached sign and monument sign for "Radisson". #341636 v1 LAS-3?`??-:J MAR 9 A zoos PLANNING DEPAIR iMENT 71 • CI'T'Y OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW March 25, 2005 Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016) Dear Mr. Johnson: The Case No. FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217-room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units are permitted today) and for height to allow the existing 155-foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use with a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to patio/pool decking and tiki bars) and to allow patio/pool decking seaward (westward) of the Coastal Construction Control Line, an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 203 spaces (existing), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; (3) a reduction to the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval, under the provisions of Section 3-1807 (SGN2005-01016), for property located at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on April 19, 2005. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3Td floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, r 'A Wa e M. Wells, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIGulfview S 0430 Adams Mark+Radisson (7) - 4.19.05 CDB - WMGulfview S 0430 4.19.05 CDB Letter.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GR.AY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER BI1.1. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATivL ACTION EMPLOYER" FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ?Owtv?tL QO.r? FAX: .4b2- - 103?d S Phone: 1?u I_ - 1%1a W-o"AygL Phone: 4J L_ FROM: RE: 43 O S . Cq ?'v t Pte.) 6 v, DATE:_ 3L/2--fl FLA)7-00s 0S A. _? NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Mar. 21 2005 09:25AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94620365 Mar.21 09:23AM 02'09 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). Conditions Associated With FLD2005-01005 wr d =9 ?` 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 03/16/2005 M. Disabled parking spaces inside parking garage do not meet current City standards. The .r--? Not Met ` ..--? O3All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504 to change Sheet 1/5 of the Civil Plans to indicate the proposed density is 116.7 units/net 03/16/2005 Fitewria 5 - WW Not Met ?.? Revise Exhibit B, Description of Request, under "a" to indicate 74 rooms (40 rooms/acre) oed (not 97), as it is based on the upland acreage. Also revise Exhibit B, Comprehensive r#8 response, to also indicate 74 rooms allowed (not 97). isabled parking spaces must be 19' long and be exclusive of the 44" wide accessible route. Suggest providing one H/C space adjacent elevator lobby, three along north wall of garage and two along south wall of garage with accessible aisles connecting all spaces to elevator lobby that do not compel user to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. This would eliminate the need for the accessible route in front of the proposed H/C spaces and allow the spaces to be realigned to meet the dimensional standards. 2?. The four check- in parking spaces do not meet the City's minimum dimensions. Parking spaces must have a 24-foot wide drive aisle for backout manueverability. The submitted plan indicates an aisle of 19-feet. Dist, ct in the Sit Data Table. Indicate both zoning districts within Site Data Table. Revise Thep perty s zoned Tourist District and Open Space/Recreation District. It appears that the zoning ? e ? at the seawall line. Based on your square footage amounts of submerged land (25,483 0.585 acre), the upland area is 1.859 acres. Cannot count submerged land area within density ulations. Provide calculations as to upland area only (116.729 rooms/acre). Provide density calc ations in the Site Data Table. Revise the land area to indicate the square footage and reage that area zoned Tourist District and for that zoned Open Space/Recreation Exhibit "B" where appropriate for upland area/acreage and density. 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - WW Not Met Parking lot interior landscaping is only required for that vehicular use area OUTSIDE of the parking garage. Ensure the vehicular use area indicated is for that area outside of the garage. • ,?-? Then, if the vehicular use area is over 4,000 square feet, then the Code requires 10% interior landscape area. If this is the case and the site is not meeting the required 10% interior landscape area, what is the amount (square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area) being provided? The Comprehensive Landscape Program application responses should be providing the iustifi .anon to the percentage being provided and/or why the 10% cannot be provided. 2/22/05 - WW Unclear why a Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted. Describe what reductions are being requested, prompting the submission. 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - WW Not Met Parking lot interior landscaping is only required for that vehicular use area OUTSIDE of the parking garage. Ensure the vehicular use area indicated is for that area outside of the garage. Then, if the vehicular use area is over 4,000 square feet, then the Code requires 10% interior landscape area. If interior landscape area is required, depict by shading or crosshatching of all CaseConditons Print Date: 03/21/2005 Page 1 of 3 • • FLD2005-01005 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Conditi n Wayne Wells 562-4504 _;d ---7 required parking lot interior landscaped areas. 2 W If interior ndscape area is required, depict by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior I n caged areas. 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - WW , Not Met Show the required sight and waterfront sight triangles on all appropriate sheets, such as Landscape Plan Sheets L1.2 and L2.1. Ensure that fences and landscaping meet the restrictions for sight and waterfront sight triangles. 2/22/ Show required sight triangles and waterfront sight triangles. 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - WW Not Met The application must include in the request any opaque fence higher than four feet within the waterfront sight triangle. If the condominium association next door wants the higher fence, then provide a letter from the condominium association stating they want the higher fence and support the increase to fence height within the waterfront sight triangle. Must provide all relevant Sheet VIS? - maximum height of fence within waterfront sight triangle is four feet (non-opaque). 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - WW Not Met The application must include in the request any opaque fence higher than 30-inches within the visibility triangle. If the condominium association next door wants the higher fence, then provide a letter from the condominium association stating they want the higher fence and support the increase to fence hei ht within the visibility triangle. Must provide all relevant 'ustification. W Sheet - maximum height of fence within sight visibility triangle is 30-inches. 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - W Not Met There is a note at the top of Sheet L1.2 near the arbor that says the pool deck is being extended. Either remove the note or provide greater detail and the proposed setback to the proposed extended pool deck and proposed arbor. L1.2 - provide greater detail and setbacks to proposed extended pool deck and proposed 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - WW Not Met Must address whether Beach Walk improvements are retaining or removing the parking and ._? sidewalk adjacent that you are connecting your handicap route to. It the existing sidewalk is being retained on the City property, then you need to determine whether any easements are necessary [with Enaineerina. She 1.1 - unclear where handicap route is going to on north side of property. Ensure this is in co plia ce with Beach Walk improvements. Easement needed onto public property (?). 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - WW Not Met Contact Engineering regarding Beach Walk improvements. Need to determine where proposed 10-foot wide sidewalk will be installed (you show it partially onto your property), the ___3> design specifications (including any street trees and landscaping) and whether you will construct or whether you will pay the City to construct. The sidewalk will need to be for the entire street frontage along S. Gulfview Blvd. 7 5- Pro 'de sidewalk within right-of-way in conformance with Beach Walk (10 feet wide with trees) for e ire frontage. 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - WW Not Met Sheet L1.2 states a new canopy structure is to be placed on the west side of the bulding, but the architectural plans don't indicate it as new. Which is it? Is the canopy there now and it is only aseConditon Print Date: 03/21/2005 Page 2 of 3 FLD2005-01005 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning CondiiWayne Wells 562-4504 vered with new awning material? - unclear what the diagonally striped area is at northwest corner of building. ise. 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - WW Not Met The hedge is a nice improvement and is encouraged. Instead of the response given, strongly suggest someone on the applicant's team talk to Engineering to seek permission to plant the hedge on the City's ro e -W Sh t 1-2.1 - appears that hedging along north property line will be planted on City property. 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - WW Not Met --'I Include as a condition of approval to comply with Sidewalk Cafe Code requirements and file a new application with building permits. She A-1 - provide the number of seats in the restaurant and the number of seats in the sidewalk caf idewalk cafe will be required to meet the Code requirements of Section 3-201.C. Submit Si ewa cafe application. 03/16/2005 3/16/05 - WW Not Met Unclear if I am missing something or what. I do not find the CSP revised to matc=signdesign shown on Sheet 4/5. Revise either Sheet 4/5 or the CSP. L/LL/VJ - VV VV Sheet 4/5 - monument sign design not that proposed under the Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP). Revise. 03/16/2005 Com rehensive Sign Program - Not Met a. Maximum height o reestanding sign in the Tourist District is six feet (not 6'-8"). Revise. -? (3/16/05 -Revise res onse to - Height on of the a lication . n i sign must include site address. Revise. (3/16/05 - Include as a condition). c. Revise a table for directional sign. Sign shown in V x 5'(5 square feet), not 20 square feet as indicate (3/16/05 -Met). d. Canno unt north side of building facade as lot frontage, as it is not facing a street. Revise. (3/16/05 M ). an of count 210 feet of public arkin de th as lot frontage. Revise. 3/16/05 - Met f. Provide colors o signs freestanding, attached and directional). (3/16/05 - Still need o provide. ?- 7 Provide colored drawin s not bl hite. g. rovide a 5/5 of the application. (3/16/05 - Met). Print Date: 03/21/2005 CaseConditons Page 3 of 3 RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS FLD2005-01 005 - 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD. MAR 10 2005 GENERAL ENGINEERING: ' _.. - "- Comment No. 1: The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1) A separate right-of-way permit is needed prior to construction of brick paver sidewalk. Applicant is cautioned that City Beach Walk plan calls for removal/replacement of all sidewalks in this area in the near future. Contact Don Melone (727-562-4798) for permit information. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response No. 1: The sidewalks shown are intended to comply with the Beach by Design criteria. We have coordinated with William Kasak of PBS&J regarding the sidewalks and their specifications. It is our intent to remove the existing sidewalks and replace with the 10' wide sidewalks in conformance with the Beach by Design criteria. We will submit the required right-of-way use permit for this work at the appropriate time. ENVIRONMENTAL: Comment No. 1: Please submit sea turtle friendly lighting design and installation details prior to building permit (per Development Standard Code; Section 3-1302-D and City Or. No. 6928-02) Response No. 1: The applicant will comply with this requirement prior to building permit. FIRE: Comment No. 1: This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. HARBOR MASTER: No issues. LEGAL: No issues. LAND RESOURCES: No issues. 0 IRIGINAL LANDSCAPING: No Comments. PARKS AND RECREATION: No Comments STORMWATER: SOLID WASTE: No issues. No comments. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: MAR 10 2005 CI'A to Comment No. 1: Show on the architectural site plan City standard dimensions for garage parking stalls and drive aisles. (Community Development Code Section 3-1402.) Response No. 1: The plans have been revised to show the dimensions of the spaces in the existing deck. Comment No. 2: Provide 5 additional disabled parking spaces to comply with the Florida Accessibility Code For Building Construction Chapter 11 Section 11-4.1.2. Response No. 2: The revised plans include the second floor plan of the deck which has 6 handicap accessible spaces. Comment No. 3: Provide on the architectural site plan arrows to show direction of travel for the parking garage. Response No. 3: The revised plans include directional arrows. Comment No. 4: Provide a diagram showing a standard passenger car (18' long) making the turns at all corners of the parking garage. The turning vehicle must not encroach in the opposing lane. Response No. 4: The turning radii are shown on the revised plans. The applicant seeks approval of the current parking configurations and counts. Comment No. 5: Where do employees and guests park? Response No. 5: Employees and hotel guests park their vehicles in the parking garage which is directly accessed from South Gulfview Boulevard. Comment No. 6: Parking Study: The parking study did not take into the consideration the elimination of the public parking facilities due to the Beach Walk Project. 2 • ORIGINAL Response No. 6: The approved methodology for conducting the parking analysis was followed. At DRC it was understood that other projects on the beach are anticipated to provide public parking to replace parking lost to the Beach Walk project. Comment No. 7: Parking Study: Staff has concerns that the study did not give an average occupancy usage of the municipal lot because the study was conducted during the month of January (off peak season) and did not take into account the occupancy usage in the peak seasons. Response No. 7: A "variance" of 14 spaces (217 required vs. 203 provided on- site) is sought. This is a 6% variance. The methodology for doing the study explained we would submit by the January 31, 2005, deadline. The study had to be conducted on the weekend it was done. Comment No. 8: Where will the tour buses, shuttle vans and/or taxis state? Response No. 8: There are no specific provisions for the staging of buses. Shuttle buses, airport limos and taxis will pick up and drop off passengers in the porte-cochere area. Comment No. 9: Provide height of canopy in the porte-cochere area (must meet minimum clear vertical height of 8'2"). Response No. 9: The vertical clearance at the existing porte-cochere exceeds 14' and is shown on the revised plans. This is not proposed to change. Comment No. 10: Provide dimensions for parking spaces and drive aisles, specifically in the porte-cochere area. Response No. 10: See the revised plans (sheet L.1.2). All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O. PLANNING: Comment No. 1: The property is zoned Tourist District and Open .., - Space/Recreation District. It appears that the zoning line is at the seawall line. Based on your square footage amounts of submerged land (25,483 sf; 0.585 acre), the upland area MAR 10 2005 is 1.859 acres. Cannot count submerged land area within density calculations. Provide calculations as to upland ., . .... ?, ,...;. ....,,.. At P1 2 C.., Ir f y I F~ ? i - - 3 0 ORIGINAL area only (116.729 rooms/acre). Provide density calculations in the Site Data Table. Revise the land area to indicate the square footage and acreage for that area zoned Tourist District and for the zoned Open Space/Recreation District in the Site Data Table. Indicate both zoning districts within the Site Data Table. Revise Exhibit "B" where appropriate for upland area/acreage density. Response No. 1: The Site Data Table has been revised to specify Tourist (1.859 acres) and Open Space/Recreation (.585 acres). Therefore, the net density is 116.73 rooms per acre. Comment No. 2: Unclear why a Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted. Describe what reductions are being requested, prompting the submission. Response No. 2: The project does not meet the interior landscaping requirement of 10% of the vehicular use area. The Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been revised to specify the reductions sought. Comment No. 3: Provide a list of proposed improvements to the property. Response No. 3: The following are proposed improvements: Repair and restoration of storm damage to room tower and ground floor spaces. Renovation of existing main restaurant and office areas. General repair and renovations to the exteriors including the entry drop off area, porte-cochere, landscape materials, signage, pool decks and pool bars. Exhibit "B" of the application has been revised to include this information. Comment No. 4: Provide an estimated cost of repairs and improvements. Provide the assessed value of the BUILDING (not land and building) per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser current information. In accordance with Section 6-103.E, if the damage is 50% or more of the assessed value of the structure, this request cannot be processed, as the Code requires the use (density) to conform to today's standard. ' J If less than 50%, then permits to repair or restore must be MAR 11 0 005 submitted within six months of the date of the damage. 4 0 * ORIGINAL Response No. 4: Per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, the assessed value of the building (without land) is $9,758,000. The estimated costs of the repairs and improvements are still under review and the total amount is not available at this time. Comment No. 5: Is the restaurant an accessory use to the hotel? If so, then no additional parking is required for the restaurant. The hotel has more units (217) than provided parking (217 spaces required; only 203 provided). Parking Study needs to address the reduction for the hotel only. Response No. 5: As discussed at DRC, the restaurant is an ancillary use to the resort hotel and therefore, a separate parking calculation for the restaurant is unnecessary. The parking analysis has been revised to assess the required reduction from 217 to 203 parking spaces. Original Comment 5: Parking required for a restaurant in the Tourist District is a range from 7 - 15 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Proposal, including the Site Data Table and the Parking Study, utilizes the seven spaces per 1,000 square feet for analysis and for the parking reduction. This is incorrect. Use the 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet for calculation of required parking and for analysis. Revise the Site Data Table, Sheet A2 (and delta of 94 spaces), the Parking Study and application to indicate 80 spaces required for the restaurant and 297 spaces overall required. Provide justification for the parking reduction down to 203 spaces. Response: As discussed at DRC, the restaurant is an ancillary use to the resort hotel and therefore, a separate parking calculation for the restaurant is unnecessary. Comment No. 6: Unclear how the building/lobby is being remodeled to add a 5,300 square-foot restaurant without adding square footage to the building. What is in the 5,300 square feet now? Response No. 6: The building renovations contemplated at this time include ?_.._.1 renovations to the existing office and restaurant areas. The 1 plans contemplate the possibility of converting one meeting room into another ancillary restaurant area in the future. MAR 10 2005 Applicable area calculations are listed on sheet A-1 in the documents we submitted. The hotel area is not being increased. CrCorriment No: 7: •- Parking Study - On Page 3, first paragraph, last sentence, it states that parking will be . increased, yet the site plan 5 0 *ORIGINAL (Sheet 1/5) indicates that EXISTING and PROPOSED parking is 203 spaces. How is parking being increased? Also revise last sentence on Page 5. Response No. 7: All documents have been revised to reflect 203 parking spaces exist and are proposed and that the code requirement is 217 parking spaces. Comment No. 8: Provide in Site Data Table the total paved area (vehicular use area) that is outside of the parking garage, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet. If greater than 4,000 square feet, must provide at least 10% interior landscape area. Response No. 8: As was noted at DRC, the vehicular use area is being reduced; however both the existing vehicular use area and the proposed vehicular use area are greater than 4,000 square feet. A Comprehensive Landscape Application was filed because interior landscaping is less than 10% of this area. Comment No. 9: If interior landscape area is required, depict by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped area. Response No. 9: The parking lot interior is within a parking garage. See Comprehensive Landscape Program Application. Comment No. 10: Letter to SWFWMD states there will be a reduction of pavement of 275 square feet, with the amount of green space/open space increasing by 465 square feet and the decrease of impervious area by 465 square feet. Where is the 190 square feet reduction of impervious surface occurring? Response No. 10: The reductions in paved areas occur in two places; at the pool deck area where the arbor/foot wash is noted and at the entry to the east of the porte-cochere where the new handicap parking place is called out. Comment No. 11: Unclear on Sheet 1/5 that there is an increase of IMPERVIOUS by 465 square feet, not PERVIOUS. Pervious should be 33,808 sf; impervious should be 72,692 sf. Revise. Response No. 11: The calculations have been corrected as shown on the revised Site Data Table. MAR 10 2005 6 s ?, ORIGINAL Comment No. 12: Show all required sight triangles and waterfront sight triangles. Response No. 12: The sight triangles are shown on the revised plans. The right- of-way sight triangle is now shown on revised sheet 4 and the waterfront sight triangle is now shown on revised sheet 3. Comment No. 13: Sheet L.1.2 - maximum height of fence within waterfront sight triangle is four feet (non-opaque). Response No. 13: The noted fences are already in place per the request or requirement of the condo property to the south. Comment No. 14: Sheet L.1.2 - maximum height of fence within sight visibility triangle is 30-inches. Response No. 14: The noted fences are already in place per the request or requirement of the condo property to the south. Comment No. 15: Sheet L.1.2 - provide greater detail and setbacks to proposed extended pool deck and proposed arbors. Response No. 15: The pool decks are not being extended, just refinished. Comment No. 16: Sheet L1.1 - unclear where handicap route is going to on north side of property. Ensure this is in compliance with Beach Walk improvements. Easement needed onto public property (?). Response No. 16: The HC connection to the city sidewalk system shown is at the only practical location. Comment No. 17: Provide sidewalk within right-of-way in conformance with Beach Walk (10 feet wide with trees) for entire frontage. Response No. 17: The current plans show the Beach Walk sidewalks to the maximum extent possible given the location of the parking deck entry ramp and service area curb cuts. Comment No. 18: Sheet L1.2 - Unclear what the diagonally striped area is at northwest corner of building. Advise/revise. Response No. 18: The diagonal striping indicates new canvas awnings. This is clarified in the revised plans. Comment No. 19: Provide typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, ` 7'? backfilling, mulching and protective measures. MAR 10 2005 7 0 ORIGINAL Response No. 19: Planting details are provided in revised the landscape plans Comment No. 20: Sheet L2.1 - appears that hedging along north property line will be planted on City property. Explain. Response No. 20: This is a small strip between the hotel and City parking area, which the applicant proposes to landscape. The applicant is amenable to removing this hedge if it is not acceptable to the City. Comment No. 21: Sheet A-1 - provide the number of seats in the restaurant and the number of seats in the sidewalk cafe. Sidewalk cafe will be required to meet the Code requirements of Section 3-201.C. Submit Sidewalk cafe application. Response No. 21: See Sidewalk Cafe Application. Comment No. 22: Sheet A-3 guest rooms are transient accommodation units - not "residential units." Revise language. Revise density based on 1.859 acres (116.729 rooms/acre). Response No. 22: "Residential" has been revised as noted. Comment No. 23: Provide the color of the fabric awning on the west side of the building. Response No. 23: The awning color was noted in the color samples as "owning fabric" which has been corrected. Comment No. 24: Any reconstruction of the tiki bars on the west side of the building must meet a 20-foot setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) OR include in request as a reduction to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL. Response No. 24: The pool deck structures will be repaired and renovated at the current locations. The existing deck encroaches into the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). The encroachment ranges from 0 to approximately 12' along the southwestern portion of the site. Accordingly, the application has been revised to include a request for a setback reduction up to 12' within the CCCL to repair and renovate existing facilities at their current location. Comment No. 25: Sheet 4/5 - monument sign design not that proposed under the Comprehensive Sign Program. Revise Response No. 25: See revised Comprehensive Sign Program Application. i J MAR 10 2005 8 P y - FS .- " . ,-..., .. - -14? j *ORIGINAL Comment No. 26: Comprehensive Sign Program - a. Maximum height of freestanding sign in the Tourist District is six feet (not 6'-8"). Revise. b. Freestanding sign must include site address. Revise. c. Revise data table for directional sign. Sign shown in V x 5'(5 square feet), not 20 square feet as indicated. d. Cannot count north side of building fagade as lot - frontage, as it is not facing a street. Revise. e. Cannot count 210 feet of public parking depth as lot MAR 10 2005 frontage. Revise. PAS`',?++ 7. f. Provide colors of signs (freestanding, attached and directional). g. Provide Page 515 of the application. Response No. 26: See revised Comprehensive Sign Program Application. Comment No. 27: Provide the height of the residential building to the south and the distance separation between the building and the residential building to the south. Response No. 27: The staff has determined that the separation distance criteria do not apply to the project. As of this filing, it was determined that there are two condominium towers located at the project to the south, known as 440 West, which each contain 17 floors. These buildings exceed 100 feet in height and are located less than 100 feet from the buildings located on the subject parcel. Comment No. 28: Revise Page 5 of Exhibit "B" - Page 48 of Beach by Design only depicts two (not three) condominium buildings south of the Adams Mark hotel. Response No. 28: Revised as noted. Comment No. 29: Revise the application and responses to criteria appropriately regarding the reduction to parking requested. Response No. 29: Revised as noted. 9 I 1 0 0 ORIGINAL OTHER: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 4/19105 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 3/10/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate 3/10/2005 9:31 AM 45686.109166 #339765 v1 - Pyramid/DRC Responses MAR i 0 2005 10 age 40 40 Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 11:12 AM To: 'Tim A. Johnson' Cc: Akin, Pam; Wells, Wayne; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Adams Mark Tim-we did look into it and believe that under Section 6-109 A-you may request termination for the nonconforming structure-which is a nonconforming structure due to height. I apologize if Wayne wasn't able to get back with you yesterday. But please note that since the request for height termination is under section 109 A, (as opposed to 109 B) then the nonconforming height can only be granted for the existing building NOT for a new building. In your current application, the proposal is to keep the existing building and renovate so this is not a problem for you. I hope this information is helpful. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 cyndi.tarapanl@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Tim A. Johnson [mailto:TimJ@jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:38 AM To: Tarapani, Cyndi Cc: Akin, Pam Subject: RE: Adams Mark It seems to me that the distance separation is like any other setback non-conformity and thus can be terminated. What would be the result if it were not terminated? The building would still be in the same location and approved to operate. Isn't that a termination? -----Original Message----- From: Cyndi.Tarapani@myClearwater.com [mailto:Cyndi.Tarapani@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:32 AM To: Tim A. Johnson; Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com Cc: michael.delk@MyClearwater.com Subject: RE: Adams Mark Tim-we will evaluate but I do not know if the distance separation can be waived. We will look into it. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 cyndi.tarapani@rnyclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Tim A. Johnson [mailto:TimJ@jpfirm.com] 3/3/2005 V gage • Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 5:01 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Tarapani, Cyndi Subject: Adams Mark • Page 2 of 2 Jayne has copied me with your response to our request that the BBD distance separation be included in the items as to which we seek a termination of non-conformity. In my opinion, failure to meet the distance separation requirement is no different than non-conformities in height, setbacks, etc. These all relate to the physical location of the existing building, which cannot be moved. I respectfully request that the distance separation non-conformity be included in our list of "requests." Timothy A. Johnson, Jr. Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel and Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: 727-461-1818 Facsimile: 727-462-0365 timj@jpfirm.com The information contained in this transmission may be attorney/client privileged and therefore confidential. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient , you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing or copy of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named above, the receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attorney/client or otherwise. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone at 727-461-1818 or e-mail. Thank you. 3/3/2005 "Message • ? Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 1:49 PM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Subject: RE: Adams Mark I will fax it to you. I had specifically asked Cyndi regarding the height/building separation and conformance with BBD. Since the Adams Mark building and the condominium buildings to the southeast exist, and have existed for some time, Cyndi told me that we weren't going to include that as part of the request (since you can't meet the BBD provisions without removal of part of the building). -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 1:36 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Tim A. Johnson; Dan Meacham; Ed Armstrong Subject: RE: Adams Mark Please fax the sidewalk cafe application to me. And one more thing, re Adam's Mark (FLD2005-01005): Tim is concerned that you did not recite our request for relief from the BBD building separation requirements in your recap of the request. We did specifically mention that in our application. I assume it is included as part of the height request but just want to make sure. Thanks Wayne. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 1:30 PM To: Jayne E. Sears Subject: RE: Adams Mark There is a separate application. If it isn't on our website, either you can pick up here or I can fax it to you. No additional fee. -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:39 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Tim A. Johnson Subject: Adams Mark 2/28/2005 Message • 0 Page 2 of 2 Wayne, is there a separate application for the sidewalk cafe? I don't see one on your website. If not, which app. do I use? Flex. dev.? and what is the fee? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 2/28/2005 FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: S e-0..s s FAX: g' to Os (0:5" Phone: 46 k ") B 1 a FROM: Q.?? Phone:bZ=? SO¢ DATE:_ 2 RE: ?}` 3 D S. u?t'V i 2.w MESSAGE: S? i NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) T ?d ?JAI?I ?? Il??I»I ?19? Feb. 28 2005 03:08PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94620365 Feb.28 03:06PM 01'52 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP--FAX (435-7329). FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: . .4 \o z - 0 "'t b 5 Phone: lb FROM: Q l?? Phone: 'L 43-0 4- DATE:. Z -77 S RE: *30 S Ci v `?v.2,? MESSAGE: 9 OVA )2 CZv-,% 1-.,49 ..-It r 3. 3.0 S _D A-. --. NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) J Feb. 27 2005 08:15PM YOUR LOGO City0fClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94620365 Feb.27 08:13PM 02'10 SND 05 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). ~LL CITY OF CLLWRWATER ° Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W .MYCLEARWATER. COM February 07, 2005 Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire P O Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757-1368 RE: FLD2005-01005 -- 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-01005. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on March 03, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-5624582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, h-vj" Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-0/005 - 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD ate: a LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ?J CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx(727) 562-4576 February 4, 2005 Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Case No. FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016, 430 S. Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Johnson: The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval for property generally located at 430 S. Gulfview Boulevard for the Adam's Mark/Radisson Hotel. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, Staff shall specify the deficiencies of the application. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. In order to stay on the current schedule for review for sufficiency by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on March 3, 2005, the following information is required to be submitted by noon on Monday, February 7, 2005 (should you be unable to meet this time frame, the next submittal deadline is February 24, 2005 [noon] to be reviewed for sufficiency by the DRC on March 31, 2005, if the application is deemed complete): The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application complete: A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. - At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; _ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER 0 "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" • • February 4, 2005 Johnson - Page 2 - COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable - Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. Provide offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; 2. Provide a Tree Inventory, prepared by a "certified arborist," of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. 3. Provide an irrigation plan. Fifteen copies (one original and 14 copies) of revised application material addressing the above comments must be submitted to the Planning Department. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.m_yclearwater.com. Sincerely, • V"4 Wayne . Wells, AICP Planner III S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IIncompleteIGulfview S 430 Adams Marke+Radisson (T) - WWIGulfview S 0430 Incomplete Letter 2.4.05.doc FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: .J A Ar•s.- S 2.o.1-S FAX: 4b2-- Q3[9S Phone: 4 ki t` 1<61 % FROM: Phone: DATE:. O f vo -!C/ S C ZODS- 0! 0/ L _Vj i MESSAGE: \ N!. -Q Ng NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3 Feb. 04 2005 05:32PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94620365 Feb.04 05:31PM 01'28 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MEMJ' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). EXHIBIT "A" Is ADAM'S MARK HOTEL RE-DEVELOPMENT SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 15 E LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION: O.R. BOOK 13283, PAGE 2290 A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER . SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED.LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33, RUN SOUTH 77'41'16" WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE; RUN THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT (RADIUS-1247.0 FEET ) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET (CHORD- 296.09 FEET, CHORD BEARING- SOUTH 19'07'51 EAST); RUN THENCE NORTH 68'55'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 36; RUN THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS 36,35,34 AND 33, WHICH LINE IS A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS-847.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET (CHORD- 235.0 FEET, CHORD BEARING-NORTH 20'17'10" WEST) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Gulf Coast Consulting,. Inc. Land Development Consulting 13825 ICOT Blvd., Suite 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 0 s CDB Meeting Date: April 19, 2005 Case Numbers: FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 Agenda Item: E3 Owner/Applicant: MSPA Acquisition H, L.P. Representative: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP Address: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUESTS: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217-room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units are permitted today) and for height to allow the existing 155-foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use with a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to patio/pool decking and Tiki bars) and to allow patio/pool decking seaward (westward) of the Coastal Construction Control Line, an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; (3) Reduction to the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval, under the provisions of Section 3-1807 (SGN2005-01016). EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R); Residential LAND USE: Facilities High (RFH) and Recreation/Open Space (R/OS) Categories PROPERTY SIZE: 2.44 total acres (1.859 acres zoned Tourist District: 0.585 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodation use (217 rooms/units) Proposed Use: Overnight accommodation use (217 rooms/units) Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 -Page 1 of 9 0 0 ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Open Space/Recreation District; Public beach LAND USES: East: Tourist District; Overnight accommodation uses, retail sales and restaurants South: Tourist District; Attached dwellings West: Preservation District; Gulf of Mexico CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is tourist-dominated area with a mixture of attached dwellings (condominium), overnight accommodation uses and tourist-oriented commercial uses. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.44 total acres (1.859 acres zoned Tourist District: 0.585 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) site is located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach. The site has approximately 235 feet of frontage on South Gulfview Boulevard (east) and 296 feet of frontage on the Gulf of Mexico (west). This parcel is currently developed with a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use (Adam's Mark Clearwater Beach Resort) in a building 155 feet in height. The hotel is currently closed due to damage sustained during Hurricane Jeanne in September 2004. Attached dwellings (condominiums) exist adjacently to the southeast. This area is a tourist-dominated area due to the site's proximity to the public beach. Proposal: The proposal is to renovate the existing hotel and re-open under the Radisson Rag. While the damage is not sufficient to warrant demolition of the hotel, due to the value of the necessary improvements Code threshold provisions require the parking and landscaping be brought into compliance with current regulations. In order to comply with Code requirements, the applicant has submitted this application. The proposal includes a request for Termination of the Status of Nonconformity for the nonconforming density of 217 rooms/units and for height to allow the existing 155-foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today). Based on the maximum allowable density of 40 rooms/units per acre for the RFH land use category and the 1.859 acres zoned Tourist, the site could be developed today with only 74 overnight accommodation rooms/units. The applicant plans to renovate the existing building by repairing and restoration of the hotel tower and ground floor spaces, renovation of the existing main restaurant and office spaces, general repair and renovation of the exterior areas (including the entry/drop-off area, porte cochere, landscaping, signage, pool decks and pool bars). Under the Termination of the Status of Nonconformity provisions, there are four required improvements: 1. Installation of perimeter buffers. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Improvement of off-street parking lots. Most parking spaces are within the parking garage. The only parking spaces outside of the parking garage are on the north side at the porte cochere. See discussion below regarding the parking reduction requested. 3. Removal of nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures. The applicant is completely renovating all existing improvements, which will require bringing Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 - Page 2 of 9 LJ signage into compliance with Code provisions. Pool bars on the west side are requested at reduced setbacks and are discussed below. 4. Use of Comprehensive Sign Program and Comprehensive Landscape Programs to satisfy requirements. The applicant has submitted a Comprehensive Sign Program to replace existing signage (see discussion ,below). A Comprehensive Landscape Program was submitted and advertised, however, recalculation of the interior landscape areas indicate compliance with Code provisions, therefore the Comprehensive Landscape Program is unnecessary. Retaining existing hotel rooms in this tourist-dominated area adjacent to Clearwater Beach is important to the vitality of Clearwater Beach. This hotel was constructed in 1974 when density and height regulations were different. The condominiums to the southeast, built in 1975, also exceed current Code height (157 feet) regulations. Submission of this Level Two request complies with the requirements of Section 6-109.A regarding the nonconforming structure height. However, any approval of this request is based upon the existing structure, which should contain a condition that any voluntary demolition of this existing building shall not vest the existing height, but requires compliance of any future reconstruction to meet current Code height requirements. Section 6-109.B permits the reconstruction of the nonconforming density on this parcel, provided the reconstruction complies with all other requirements of the Community Development Code. The existing building does not comply with the Beach by Design requirement for building spacing of 100 feet for buildings that exceed 100 feet in height; however, these buildings have existed in their present location for 30 years, prior to the adoption of Beach by Design. The redevelopment of the parcel to allow reopening of this hotel is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards of the Code. The existing and proposed development is consistent with the community character of the tourist-based immediate vicinity. The proposal includes a parking reduction from the required 217 parking spaces to 201 parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a parking study that analyzes the parking demands for this hotel. The parking study indicates this 16-space deficit is justified by the use of airport shuttles, limo and taxi services for their guests, as well as public transportation (Jolly Trolley) that stops in front of the hotel. The accessory restaurants are primarily patronized by hotel guests and guests of nearby hotels and condominium owners that are within walking distance or use public transportation. There do also exist on-street parking spaces available (most which will be removed by the Beach Walk project). Termination of Status of Nonconformity provisions require bringing the existing parking into Code compliance. Handicap parking within the parking garage and at the porte cochere will be upgrade to current Code provisions. A sidewalk connection on the north side for handicap access to a sidewalk on City property is proposed. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion for this hotel, all City approvals and easements necessary for the sidewalk connection for handicap accessibility must be obtained. The southern two parking spaces on the west side of the porte cochere do not meet Code provisions for required drive aisle width (backup area). The plans still indicate these two spaces, however, their removal has been advertised as part of the parking reduction request. Prior to the issuance of any permits, site and building plans must be revised to show the removal of, and the striping out of, these two southern parking spaces as a "no parking" area. Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 - Page 3 of 9 0 0 Beach by Design calls for the construction of 10-foot wide sidewalks along major roads for pedestrian safety and convenience. The site plans indicate compliance with this requirement. However, with the construction of Beach Walk improvements, and to ensure consistency of sidewalk design (along with any landscape or street lighting improvements), the applicant will need to work with the City toward meeting the City design specifications. Approval of this request should be conditioned on compliance with these specifications and to allow for an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction of the sidewalk within the right-of-way. The proposal includes the renovation of the pool deck on the west side of the building and reconstruction of the Tiki bars. The Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) cuts through a portion of the pool deck area. Code provisions require the measurement of setbacks from this CCCL. The proposal includes a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to patio/pool decking and Tiki bars) and to continue to allow patio/pool decking seaward (westward) of the CCCL. As these structures have existed in this location for 30 years without any adverse effects, the setback reduction appears appropriate. The applicant has submitted a Comprehensive Sign Program (SGN2005-01016) as part of the request. Existing signage will be removed. A 36 square-foot, monument-style freestanding sign, advertising the "Radisson" hotel, at a height of six feet is proposed between the existing building and the sidewalk. Three attached signs are proposed. Two signs advertise "Radisson," one 68.32 square-foot sign on the north side of the building and one 153.48 square-foot sign on the top of the east side of the building. A third attached sign of five square feet, more of a directional sign, indicates the "parking garage." Proposed signage meets the Comprehensive Sign Program requirements. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 803.C) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement cases for this property. Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 - Page 4 of 9 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803.C): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 217 rooms/units X** DENSITY (40 rooms/ units per acre) (74 rooms/units max.)* IMPERVIOUS 0.683 X SURFACE RATIO ISR 0.95 maximum LOT AREA (20,000 2.44 total acres (1.859 acres zoned X sq. ft. minimum) Tourist District: 0.585 acres zoned O en S ace/Recreation District) LOT WIDTH (100 - 235 linear feet along South Gulfview X 150 feet minimum Boulevard FRONT SETBACK 28 feet (to building) X 10-15 feet REAR SETBACK Zero feet (to patio/pool decking and X** 10-20 feet Tiki bars) SIDE SETBACK North: 0.8 feet (to existing decking) X 0-10 feet South: 1.3 feet to existing decking) HEIGHT (35-100 feet) 155 feet (to roof deck) X** PARKING SPACES 201 spaces X** (one space per room) 217 spaces reg.) * Based on 1.859 acres zoned Tourist. ** See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 - Page 5 of 9 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.0: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 - Page 6 of 9 i 0 0 C OMPT.IANC'F WITH C.FNFRAT. CTANI)ARI)C (CPrtinn 1-011)- I Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS 1. The subject 2.44 total acres (1.859 acres zoned Tourist District: 0.585 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) is located within the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is for a 217-room hotel (which is nonconforming to current density maximums of 74 rooms), at a building height of 155 feet (which is nonconforming to current maximum building heights of 150 feet) and with 201 parking spaces (198 spaces within a parking garage and three spaces at the porte cochere on the north side of the building, where 217 spaces are required under current Code regulations); 3. The site is located adjacently south of Clearwater Beach and the Beach Walk District of Beach by Design; 4. The hotel is currently closed due to damage sustained during Hurricane Jeanne in September 2004; 5. The applicant is proposing to reopen the closed hotel under a new flag for the same 217 rooms and 201 parking spaces; 6. The site is located in a tourist-dominated area due to the site's proximity to Clearwater Beach; 7. The hotel has operated at this location with the same density and number of parking spaces for 30 years without major conflict and retaining existing hotel rooms in this tourist- dominated area adjacent to Clearwater Beach is important to the vitality of Clearwater Beach; 8. The proposed parking reduction is justified by the applicant, as described in their Parking Study; 9. While reductions to the rear (west) setback to patio/pool decking and Tiki bars, which the patio/pool decking will also be seaward (westward) of the Coastal Construction Control Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 - Page 7 of 9 0 0 Line are requested, these reductions are consistent with existing setbacks for the same structures that have existed on the west side of the hotel for 30 years; 10. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development, and will assist in retaining the community character of the immediate vicinity; and 11. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density and building height complies with the criteria of Section 6-109; 2. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C: 3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 4. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with Beach by Design; 5. Staff concludes that the proposed signage complies with the Comprehensive Sign Program standards, under the provisions of Section 3-1807; and 6. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on March 3, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217-room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units are permitted today) and for height to allow the existing 155-foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development application to permit a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use with a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to patio/pool decking and Tiki bars) and to allow patio/pool decking seaward (westward) of the Coastal Construction Control Line, an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; and (3) Comprehensive Sign Program application, under the provisions of Section 3-1807 (SGN2005-01016) for the site at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density and building height per Section 6-109; 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 4. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; 5. Staff proposed signage complies with the Comprehensive Sign Program standards, under the provisions of Section 3-1807; and Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 - Page 8 of 9 9 0 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development, and will assist in retaining the community character of the immediate vicinity. Conditions of Approval: 1. That any voluntary demolition of this existing building shall not vest the existing height of 155 feet. Any future reconstruction requires compliance with current Code height requirements; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 3. That the sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 4. That all City approvals and easements necessary for the sidewalk connection for handicap accessibility to the sidewalk on City property to the north be obtained prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion; 5. That prior to the issuance of any permits, site and building plans be revised to show the removal of, and the striping out of, the two southern parking spaces on the west side of the porte cochere as a "no parking" area, acceptable to the Engineering Department; 6. That fencing within the visibility triangles and waterfront visibility triangles be brought into compliance with Code provisions prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. Fence height increases above that otherwise permitted and alternate fence materials shall only be allowed (1) in the waterfront visibility triangle if a letter of "no objection" is submitted from the adjacent condominium association board and (2) in the visibility triangle if acceptable to the Engineering Department; 7. That the City, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion, approve the sidewalk caf6 on the west side; 8. That the monument-style freestanding sign not exceed six feet in height, meet a five-foot setback from property lines and include the site address; 9. That all construction comply with FEMA requirements; and 10. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: Y V r• W QQ, Wayne f Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S:• Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIGulfview S 0430 Adams Mark+Radisson (7) - 4.19.05 CDB - WWIGulfview S 0430 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005 Cases FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 - Page 9 of 9 • q PAPAYA ST t. ? K 6 o C. aw VMDV RO S? AR3T Or THIRD e) OR PROJECT a SITE o ? &tNiRT WATER OR "a aT 9AYSIDE C ?rn'AY %mo ? Ad SS 4- 0 4- C? Location Map Owner. MSPA Acquisition 11, L.P. Case: FLD2005-01005 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 44 2 Size (Acres) : . PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A • Aerial Map Owner. 1 MSPA Acquisition II, L.P. Case: FLD2005-01005 Site: ( 430 South Gulfview Boulevard I Property 2.44 Size(Acres): PIN: 107/29/15/52380/000/0330 1 Atlas Page: I 276A • r1 U FrFrhr Sr o - Q •_I --F 406 I 41> L_40S, j 409 i - Ir '..? - O i IJ/ ll I 1 ? =. 410 ----°'t 415 I 1 r_ r 412 421 -42 1 0 , _ 420 1 / -? I X431 I ^ 1 10 1 1 --49 if ' I 1 1 '143? Al 436- 1 k3O ? 39 I ; Q ; q 1 c ?? t 430 - > Z ; ! I 1 446 `- I i L? I V ? L I ! 1 I / ` O Zoning Map Owner. MSPA Acquisition II, L.P. Case: FLD2005-01005 Site: 430 South Gulfv)ew Boulevard Property 2.44 Size(Acres) : PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A • F/F / 4 26 TH Sr 26 112 `--- ----I Q 121 -72 W ! __ . 27 ! Q I / ! t _ s ,-"I 112 ' ?i&o , O I 28 4>1 V L _ idbt I 74 - I I 11 ?? I `40?Ll;C?I ,-?-j 75 121 I 4x ? 2Beach 410 ie j ' 141s 30 412 !-}??//??-_ 4' 0 126 I I -t i ! 8`? 31 --1 43e3 ' 420 h I g ' I-` 6 i` 32 143 W19 a o % 80 q3? _J i+ 133 k30 7 1 , I 34 1 , 430 \ Q ! 0 it ` %OvI tm 36 134 1 85, $5 Q 1. ?y 6?% V Z 445 r L_ 1 88 ! - AttachedldweHings p !! ti I `p 111 fr?\ i ! I-I / / I / 7 / Overnight aecom. Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. MSPA Acquisition II, L.P. Case: FLD2005-01005 Site: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 44 2 Size(Acres): . PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A • n ? 1 0 i 'i a "ITT i View looking southwest at subject property View looking north at public parking and beach north of subject property (S. Gulfview Blvd. on right) 430 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 0 i View looking west at sidewalk on public beach north of subject property View of overnight accommodation use to the northeast of subject property across S. Gulfview Blvd. 1 of 2 9 View looking east at commercial uses across S. Gulfview Blvd. 0 View looking southeast at commercial uses across S. Gulfview Blvd. 0 y as + 4 ¦ ¦ as a + i .el.L i . w _ y o r a View looking southwest at 440 West condominiums to View looking south at 440 West condominiums the southeast of subject property (showing proximity to the southeast of subject property (showing to hotel) both towers) 430 South Gulfview Boulevard 2 of 2 FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 9 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:02 PM To: 'jjorczak@djflaw.com' Subject: FLD2005-01005, 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. Attached is the staff report for the April 19, 2005, CDB agenda for this item. Gulfview S 0430 Staff Report.d... 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 7:19 AM To: 'Nick Fri' Subject: RE: 430 S. Gulfview Nick - The request included "to allow patio/pool decking seaward (westward) of the Coastal Construction Control Line." This is existing patio/pool decking that is proposed to be resurfaced with epoxy coating (see Sheet L1.2). This was included out of caution. Since the pool/patio decking is existing, I do not believe a State permit is required to resurface it with epoxy coating. The two pool/patio bars indicated to be rebuilt are east (landward) of the CCCL. Hope this answers your questions. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Nick Fri [mailto:nfritsch@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 9:54 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 430 S. Gulfview Wayne, I note that this plans to construct saeward of the CCL, coastal const. line. I believe this requires a state permit. I did not see evidence of that approval. Did I miss something? Nick 4/18/2005 Conditions Associated With FLD2005-01005 ?.` ,? i 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD r ?,= ??, .??? iTER Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 03/16/2005 1. Disabled parking spaces inside parking garage do not meet current City standards. The disabled parking spaces must be 19' long and be exclusive of the 44" wide accessible route. Suggest providing one H/C space adjacent elevator lobby, three along north wall of garage and two along south wall of garage with accessible aisles connecting all spaces to elevator lobby that do not compel user to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. This would eliminate the need for the accessible route in front of the proposed H/C spaces and allow the spaces to be realigned to meet the dimensional standards. 3/31/05 - MET 2. The four check- in parking spaces do not meet the City's minimum dimensions. Parking spaces must have a 24-foot wide drive aisle for backout manueverability. The submitted plan indicates an aisle of 19-feet. 3/31/05 - TWO NORTHERN SPACES ARE ACCEPTABLE. TWO SOUTHERN SPACES DO NOT MEET 24' DRIVEAISLE REQUIREMENT DUE TO PORTE-A-COCHERE COLUMN AND MUST BE ELIMINATED WITH LANDSCAPING OR DESIGNATED AS A NO PARKING ZONE. 3. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. 3/31/05 - COMMENT #2 MUST A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504 04/09/2005 4/9/05 - WW Also revise Exhibit B, Comprehensive Infill criteria #8 response, to also indicate 74 rooms allowed (not 97). 3/16/05 - WW Need to change Sheet 1/5 of the Civil Plans to indicate the proposed density is 116.7 units/net acre. Revise Exhibit B, Description of Request, under "a" to indicate 74 rooms (40 rooms/acre) are allowed (not 97), as it is based on the upland acreage. Also revise Exhibit B, Comprehensive Infill criteria #8 response, to also indicate 74 rooms allowed (not 97). 2/22/05 - WW The property is zoned Tourist District and Open Space/Recreation District. It appears that the zoning line is at the seawall line. Based on your square footage amounts of submerged land (25,483 sf; 0.585 acre), the upland area is 1.859 acres. Cannot count submerged land area within density calculations. Provide calculations as to upland area only (116.729 rooms/acre). Provide density calculations in the Site Data Table. Revise the land area to indicate the square footage and acreage for that area zoned Tourist District and for that zoned Open Space/Recreation District in the Site Data Table. Indicate both zoning districts within Site Data Table. Revise Exhibit "B" where appropriate for upland area/acreage and density. 04/09/2005 4/9/05 - WW Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 3/16/05 - WW The application must include in the request any opaque fence higher than four feet within the waterfront sight triangle. If the condominium association next door wants the higher fence, then provide a letter from the condominium association stating they want the higher fence and support the increase to fence height within the waterfront sight triangle. Must provide all relevant Print Date: 04/12/2005 Not Met Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Page 1 of 3 • • FLD2005-01005 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504 justification. 2/22/05 - WW Sheet L1.2 - maximum height of fence within waterfront sight triangle is four feet (non-opaque). 04/09/2005 4/9/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 3/16/05 - WW The application must include in the request any opaque fence higher than 30-inches within the visibility triangle. If the condominium association next door wants the higher fence, then provide a letter from the condominium association stating they want the higher fence and support the increase to fence height within the visibility triangle. Must provide all relevant justification. 2/22/05 - WW Sheet L1.2 - maximum height of fence within sight visibility triangle is 30-inches. 04/09/2005 4/9/05 & 3/16/05 - WW Not Met Must address whether Beach Walk improvements are retaining or removing the parking and sidewalk adjacent that you are connecting your handicap route to. It the existing sidewalk is being retained on the City property, then you need to determine whether any easements are necessary with Engineering. 2/22/05 - WW Sheet L1.1 - unclear where handicap route is going to on north side of property. Ensure this is in compliance with Beach Walk improvements. Easement needed onto public property (?). 04/09/2005 4/9/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 3/16/05 - WW Contact Engineering regarding Beach Walk improvements. Need to determine where the proposed 10-foot wide sidewalk will be installed (you show it partially onto your property), the design specifications (including any street trees and landscaping) and whether you will construct or whether you will pay the City to construct. The sidewalk will need to be for the entire street frontage along S. Gulfview Blvd. 2/22/05 - WW Provide sidewalk within right-of-way in conformance with Beach Walk (10 feet wide with trees) for entire frontage. 04/09/2005 4/9/05 - WW Not Met Applicant has indicated the proposed hedge will not be installed. Potentially include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 3/16/05 - WW The hedge is a nice improvement and is encouraged. Instead of the response given, strongly suggest someone on the applicant's team talk to Engineering to seek permission to plant the hedge on the City's property. 2/22/05 - WW Sheet L2.1 - appears that hedging along north property line will be planted on City property. Explain. 04/09/2005 4/9/05 & 3/16/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval to comply with Sidewalk Cafe Code requirements and file a new application with building permits. 2/22/05 - WW Sheet A-1 - provide the number of seats in the restaurant and the number of seats in the sidewalk cafe. Sidewalk cafe will be required to meet the Code requirements of Section 3-201.C. Submit Sidewalk cafe application. 04/09/2005 4/9/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 3/16/05 - WW CaseConditons Print Date: 04/12/2005 Page 2 of 3 10 0 FLD2005-01005 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504 Comprehensive Sign Program - a. Maximum height of freestanding sign in the Tourist District is six feet (not 6'-8"). Revise. (4/9/05 - Sign drawing still shows 6'-8" height. Include as a condition; 3/16/05 - Revise response to #2 - Height on Page 3 of the application). b. Freestanding sign must include site address. Revise. (4/9/05 & 3/16/05 - Include as a condition). c. Revise data table for directional sign. Sign shown in 1' x 5' (5 square feet), not 20 square feet as indicated. (3/16/05 - Met). d. Cannot count north side of building facade as lot frontage, as it is not facing a street. Revise. (3/16/05 - Met). e. Cannot count 210 feet of public parking depth as lot frontage. Revise. (3/16/05 - Met) f. Provide colors of signs (freestanding, attached and directional). (4/9/05 - met; 3/16/05 - Still need to provide. Provide colored drawings, not black & white.) g. Provide Page 5/5 of the application. (3/16/05 - Met). CaseConditons Print Date: 04/12/2005 Page 3 of 3 0 11 Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 1:56 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Map Request for FLD2005-01005, 430 South Gulfview Boulevard ELJ zone.doc location.doc FLD Map request existing.doc aerial.doc form.doc Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 8:53 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for FLD2005-01005, 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-01005 for the property at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne << File: FLD Map request form.doc >> 1 1 1 1? I I' r ----- -? x}'30 S. ?j,???v__ec,v,_ _ - R? A ?'?' . ? .. . J rr ??- ?a-_ - ??-?.? ' `?. i? .. 1 ?. + i' i+ 1 r_ J ?? ?? _.-_. - - } i .! ;? i =I YA is ". w am* ft,& A. w A et. -r upv 1v • ?. ®v to If r v a - vei-v %w ® . ? 267A 2678 ? s 70,°1 ,# CITY OF LEAK ATER C w - &7 . t CM lot 5 ' 9 a5 Cf. AND VICINITY PINELLAS COUNTY. PLORIDA 2 a O 32/02 32/03 es M roe PREPARED BY s PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION NCINEERING E 2 3 $ f1R$T as STREET 8 „ S WATER LOT A 100 S Nlrlla A fl 33756 Ph, (613)562-4750, F- (°tJ)526-4755 W 4 nup://ww».<LOr»al<r-O.com/<ngln<n/ $ 1e / T : u1 De m 5 t i l01 52 98 t S 8 14 O p0 6 C r 7 r 0'1 N [ D m Dixlalm<r: Pudic M1dmOtlon data Is lulnlahed by the city or ClealwOle! 53 99 rlt 7 7 1 0 V Pudic Works Adminfstrat Ion/Engin-eng, and ast b, accepted poll used by ins redpfent wlth the understanding that the data received was cd Het ed for the vr ase of d,wlo t hi 0 e B all 54 D,4 61-760 gg 2 Is 9 1 3 r/s O y 8 -'? p p g o grap c p Inlrosimcture 1-tdY.As such, the Ci!Y of Cleo-41 PWA/E 1 fq C 10 s \ \7 t/1 5 tPo 11 02 M y1' $ 12 , makes wdlan 1 4s, 1ADresaed or Implied, c Ing IM °Ceuraey. y. eemdelen<as. 1111.151111y. pr s it the y of Ihis dojo for any alhel tar use. iurth<rmare the City of ter 4 1 9 P• 13 11 R P 103 1?Stp 0.9 15 16 I7 IB 19 I20 2 23 21 25 27 B 52 ? Ib u-1, , liability »halaaevv associated .1th wHh the use PWnnt essu of na data d misusr of sreh dole ? . r-4o7 10 51 0 I ° I . . rg 29 E A h e 11 S1 5 1D4 „7e0 ?rrpa 51 ra0 Tq2 50 69 C S ?a 12 C fi 19 ? 0 c This All.. page Is sub?? to perladk changes. For information about latest revislans please call PWA/E w 11111 pur Web site. s ; 30 = 7 STREET Jot f2 o 1 d 7710 g M te/ IS 11 /S 12 31 705 M / 40 i9 38 I37 75 ]. 3 3I 32 13 I and N 66-Ij Y 106., aft - 11 aoa ?I 1 1r De0 ap gg b13 I EV O IA - ' 61 09 air 16 ale 1 all 62 1 1 9 a/e ay aPo 0 am /' D all S O 2A r 0 100 200 400 600 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiij 63 1 1 dri / " ' 78 61 1 _ as 671 3 " SCALE: t 400 -to 19 eat auto 11 r1, 7x art SA . zo .. 88 771 n em 1 ft IA e0't w1orvex 15 A4 9 T/2 03 ae 211" 5 7 LEGEND: 10 6y 56 . a/1 67 u. Sd 116 p 22 66 s $ 6 • 53 52 A E 4e ?7 orb ors a 42 41 4D R 1 SO 49 61 3 : tt O BLOCK NUMBER 1 je P ?.?? ? g = 9 39 a x/11 23 8$7I $?a i??Fe ?? 37 Q 36 ur 69 110 N ?"7 m BRI 8 b` J 1234 LOT ADDRESS 1 IAITWATER 2 24 119 ue g & L ` • b • 3' Si 31 DRIVE c 70 u $ t o r+3g3 32 i a$ B 8 C 4R. ; ,.t a ai T 25 O., 9 5 k? tl aee 71 120 3 . 11 12 ' 6 7 ? °0 ? $4 --??? CITY LIMITS LINE e 16V as 9 t0 a 30 16 1] S /8 ON TEm' AY ;? 26 ) $ FlFZ77 t0 9A 7 32 _ 20 27 ? ? ,q 0 ?' r`-'1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY 4 r 23 § y20 26ti q ,pr 72 127 STREET 100 10A 1 `-- OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS ! ?JJ g 25 _ 27 73 122 1 12 IA P T6 26 ? AGREEMENT TO ANNEX 1 .°. 1b1-bl ,oe ,pa 27 T 29 ,11 74 $ m a 1 1 1 ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY 7y 121 .4 p °a + " ! tV ,ro 29 1 6 10 2 3 1 S 1 124 DR ZONING DESIGNATION / 7B »h 6 UB N A 30 119 Ih 11 1f 9 8 g ' 7 B 17 1? 11 1 0D 4 h 10 2 1J 9 2 126 t 77 S 8,A ,Po 1E S ?' • TT jj 7 127 31 T 2071E LINE B C BAY4DE yA QT 4a1 e . 32 71A 29 12B/ao 4ID = 1., ] H , 2 S 0 $ k £ $ ' i $'? . F ! F ? ? a 8 0 ?r+ j 3 1 < 8 129 7 11 13 $ 5 z d 4p E 4 Z 33 w 11 6 7 6 9 10 1f 1T 11 16 15 <?,? B 12 if 10 A 6 ?0 (ti?0 H 74 4 a/ 8t 130 5 ' s7 .'` ` E B e2 131 ss '? ? 6 N 4 V JS 4Ab e3 132 C ?94P 64 1 ' 7 ,S 3 AAp e 131 3 E 6 ? + y4? ? 8 i ?tP 87 a 9 0 440 WEST +o y D CONDO `lp 1? •1, 8 M 22-27 S g` ti t Az ? 4a T 4i 3 llD 4 6 REVISED ? 8 DAYw A RE ' 5 : 03/06 99 S 6 7 CO 6a d ' / e 9 -- - -- -- ? -- ., ,? ,a - -- -- ------ ZONING ATLAS V 285A SW 1/4 OF SECTION 1 276A 2858 8 - 29 S - 15 E ,,?.- „?16 P-A 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 2:32 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2005-01005 - 430 S. Gulfview Wayne, Engineering has reviewed the resubmittal for this project. The following should be conditions of approval: 1. THE TWO SOUTHERN CHECK-IN SPACES DO NOT MEET 24' DRIVE AISLE REQUIREMENT DUE TO PORTE-A-COCHERE COLUMN AND MUST BE ELIMINATED WITH LANDSCAPING OR DESIGNATED AS A NO PARKING ZONE. 2. Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Wells, Wayne From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:34 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Thompson, Neil Subject: FW: Adams Mark issues for the file. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 cyndi.tarapani@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:34 AM To: 'timj@jpfirm.com' Subject: FW: Adams Mark issues Tim-here is the latest on the occupational license for Adams mark. It is my understanding that the license either is issued or will be today. If this is not the case, please let me know. I believe that the issuance of the license resolves any concern that Planning would have regarding the lapse in business. Does this resolve your concern? Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 cyndi.tarapani@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:27 AM To: Tarapani, Cyndi Subject: FW: Adams Mark issues Done - thanks for bringing this to my attention Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Wagner, James Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:23 AM To: Kronschnabl, Jeff Cc: Garriott, Kevin Subject: FW: Adams Mark issues This license has been issued. There are no name or owner changes on this license. The owner's representative knows the license expires September 31, 2005. -----Original Message----- From: Wagner, James Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:04 AM To: Kronschnabl, Jeff Subject: RE: Adams Mark issues 1 I talked to the owner's representative late in the day on FTay. I have documentation showing there have been no owner or name changes as originally stated. The license will be renewed with Kevin's approval on Tuesday morning. -----Original Message----- From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 7:58 AM To: Legters, Neil; Garriott, Kevin; Wagner, James Subject: RE: Adams Mark issues Kevin - if you concur, please move forward with the issuance of the license and advise - thanks -----Original Message----- From: Legters, Neil Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 12:54 PM To: Kronschnabl, Jeff; Garriott, Kevin; Wagner, James Subject: RE: Adams Mark issues Jeff, James discussed this question with me and I told him he should issue the Occ. Lic. My reasoning is; 1. - A building can be under repair or remodeling with out canceling the Occ. 2. - If the building is not habitable because of repairs then the ability to use the building is restricted but the ability to repair and use is not. As each unit is repaired and usable it could be rented out. 3. - If the damage was caused by a storm it was not the fault of the owner that the building must be repaired. He wants to repair so he will have the use of his property. 4. - Will not issuing-the Occ cause a hardship on the owner from some time limiting regulation in a code or ordnance? And'if we refuse to issue are we setting up a failure situation that we could be sued for damages later? I believe we should issue the Occ and when the permits are cleared the "Business" will be the same as it was before the storm damage. Hope this helps, Neil -----Original Message----- From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 11:25 AM To: Garriott, Kevin; Legters, Neil; Wagner, James Cc: Tarapani, Cyndi; Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: FW: Adams Mark issues FYI - see Cyndi's question - can you -----Original Message----- From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Friday, March 25,.2005 9:02 AM To: Kronschnabl, Jeff Cc: Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: Adams Mark issues three get together and give me an answer - thanks Jeff-I haven't received an answer to this issue and Tim Johnson is asking me to respond again. Could you please look into this? Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 cyndi.tarapani@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:01 PM To: Kronschnabl, Jeff Cc: Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: Adams Mark issues 2 ft 0 0 I am confused about some of James' statements below: if the license has been paid for, then why hasn't it been issued? Has it not been issued because the building is not habitable or is there some other reason? Can you please explain to me why the new owners couldn't get a license now to replace them as the owner. Thanks for your help-these details are important as I sort through the abandonment issue. Thanks again. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 cyndi.tarapani@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:52 AM To: Tarapani, Cyndi; Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: FW: Adams mark issues Latest update from our end -----Original Message----- From: Wagner, James Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 3:39 PM To: Kronschnabl, Jeff Cc: Shawen, Dee; Garriott, Kevin; Newell, Lindsey Subject: RE: Adams Mark issues There is an OCL on hold for this hotel. The hotel has been sold and the new owners have paid for the OCL but have not received the license because of the open permits. From the past email going around, It sounds like the building is unoccupied and waiting for the completion of the remodeling to receive the Certificate of Completion for their OCL. Dee Shawen has been working with this OCL case. OCL9317161 and BIZ2004-02174 I have a call out to Ross Summers at 443-5714 to find out more information. The 6 month abandonment issue has to be handled through our Planning Department. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:48 AM To: Wagner, James; Garriott, Kevin Subject: FW: Adams Mark issues Can you research and advise - thanks -----Original Message----- From: Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:48 AM To: Tarapani, Cyndi Cc: Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: Adams Mark issues News to me - let me check on this and get back to you Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 4:51 PM To: Kronschnabl, Jeff Cc: Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: FW: Adams Mark issues Jeff-I am surprised to hear that license. Would you please check nonconforming status of the site Thanks very much. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 cyndi.tarapani@myclearwater.com the Adams Mark hotel does NOT have an occupational this-it is a very important fact with regard to the I will not respond to Tim until I hear from you. 3 -----Original Message----- From: Tim A. Johnson [mailto:TimJ@jpfirm.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 2:51 PM To: Tarapani, Cyndi Cc: Jim Dina Subject: RE: Adams Mark issues In speaking with Lindsey Newell at the City, I have learned that the hotel does not have an occupational license and will not be issued one until it is repaired and operational. This is a Catch 22. Is this a problem on the abandonment issue? As you know, we are doing everything that can be done to get the hotel positioned so that it can be repaired. -----Original Message----- From: Cyndi.Tarapani@myClearwater.com [mailto:Cyndi.Tarapani@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 1:09 PM To: Tim A. Johnson Subject: Adams Mark issues I wanted to respond to your question regarding whether or not the 6 month abandonment provision for nonconforming uses is tolled while repairs are being done-re Section 6-103D of the Community Development Code. The answer is that the time would be tolled as long as: 1. An active occupational license is maintained for the use during the repairs and 2. work on a building permit continues to make consistent progress, i.e., the work is done in a timely fashion, inspections are requested and the work completed in a time associated with the typical amount of time to do the repairs. I hope this answers your questions. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 cyndi.tarapani@myclearwater.com 4 Wells, Wayne From: Elbo, Bennett Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 3:04 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: FLD2005-01005 Adams Mark- 430 S. Gulfview Blvd. Wayne, Scott and I had a telephone conversation today with Shawn Cashen with Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. regarding the issue of non-conforming parking stalls in front of the porte-cochere labeled check-in parking. We came to an agreement that the two parking stalls adjacent to the building or the two southern parking stalls will be either replaced with landscaping or marked with yellow striping designating it as "NO Parking" along with signage. Shawn Cashen will write this in a "Development Agreement" and submit a revised site plan at the time of Building Permit stage. He will get in touch with the attorney and owner of the project to discuss before taking action. If you have questions please call me. Bennett Elbo Traffic Operations Division City of Clearwater (727)562-4775 bennett.elbo@myclearwater.com U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: .%\3 - Z-%% - 0 1 a a Phone: 0 0- 2 `8 3- 9 3 X Z.Z- b FROM: ??\S Phone: --2Z1 ` S U 2' ?} S O DATE:.-3j Z:5 aS RE: oLD?•.?S 1" MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE). I to ( r 0 Mar. 23 2005 02:33PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98132810900 Mar.23 02:17PM 15'34 SND 16 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). • f Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:47 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; Planning Subject: RE: resubmittals for April 19, 2005 CDB Meeting reviewed all cases and updated all conditions in Permit Plan. 430 Gulfview- No Issues. 15 Avalon- Condition Met. 715 Gulfview- No Issues. 2520 Sunset Point Rd- No Issues. 830 Bayway- Condition #20 was not met, changed requirement to be submitted at Building Permit. 665 Bay Esplanade- No Issues. 200 Skiff Point- Condition Met. 600 Bayway- No Issues. -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 3:09 PM To: Planning Subject: FW: resubmittals for April 19, 2005 CDB Meeting April 19 CDB -----Original Message----- From: Parry, Mark Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 2:23 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: resubmittals for April 19, 2005 CDB Meeting I believe that would be the April 19 CDB Mark T. Parry Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 727.562.4558 mark.parry@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 1:41 PM To: Planning Subject: resubmittals for April 19, 2005 CDB Meeting Importance: High Good Afternoon Everyone, Today was resubmittal date for the April 15, 2005 CDB Meeting. Here is a list of cases with planners for you all. Alissa and I will be date stamping these cases and will get them to you as quickly as we can. Have a Great Day! Sherry Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst 1. FLD2005-01005,SGN2005-01016 & Comp Landscape Adams Mark Hotel - 430 S Gullfview (Planner: Wayne Wells) 2. FLD2005-01007 & Comp Landscape - Ambiance on White Sands - 15 Avalon (Planner: Wayne Wells) 3. FLD2005-01016, TDR2005-01017 & Comp Landscape - Sunspree - 715 S. Gulfview Blvd (Planner: Wayne Wells) • • 4. FLD2004-02011A, PLT2004-00007 - Townhome Manors - 2520 Sunset Point Road (Planner: Mike Reynolds) 5. FLD2005-01008 - Clearwater Yacht Club - 830 Bayway Blvd (Planner: Marc Mariano) 6. FLD2005-01009 - Robert Pennock - 665 Bay Esplanade (Planner: Marc Mariano) 7. FLD2005-01012 & Comp Landscape - 200 Skiff Point (Planner: Marc Mariano) 8. FLD2005-01010 - Bay Harbor - 600 Bayway Blvd - (Planner: John Schodtler) Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:25 PM To: DRC Members Subject: Resubmittals for April 19 Importance: High Good Afternoon DRC Members Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the April 19, 2005, CDB meeting: have placed one copy of the case resubmitted package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Wednesday, March 16, 2005. 1. FLD2005-01005,SGN2005-01016 & Comp Landscape Adams Mark Hotel - 430 S Gullfview (Planner: Wayne Wells) 2. FLD2005-01007 & Comp Landscape - Ambiance on White Sands - 15 Avalon (Planner: Wayne Wells) 3. FLD2005-01016, TDR2005-01017 & Comp Landscape - Sunspree - 715 S. Gulfview Blvd (Planner: Wayne Wells) 4. FLD2004-0201 1 A, PLT2004-00007 - Townhome Manors - 2520 Sunset Point Road (Planner: Mike Reynolds) 5. FLD2005-01008 - Clearwater Yacht Club - 830 Bayway Blvd (Planner: Marc Mariano) 6. FLD2005-01009 - Robert Pennock - 665 Bay Esplanade (Planner: Marc Mariano) 7. FLD2005-01012 & Comp Landscape - 200 Skiff Point (Planner: Marc Mariano) 8. FLD2005-01010 - Bay Harbor - 600 Bayway Blvd - (Planner: John Schodtler) 9. FLD2004-02015 - 483 Mandalay Avue ( Planner Wayne Wells) Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 3:09 PM To: Planning Subject: FW: resubmittals for April 19, 2005 CDB Meeting April 19 CDB -----Original Message----- From: Parry, Mark Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 2:23 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: resubmittals for April 19, 2005 CDB Meeting I believe that would be the April 19 CDB Mark T. Parry Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 727.562.4558 mark.parry@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 1:41 PM To: Planning Subject: resubmittals for April 19, 2005 CDB Meeting Importance: High Good Afternoon Everyone, Today was resubmittal date for the April 15, 2005 CDB Meeting. Here is a list of cases with planners for you all. Alissa and I will be date stamping these cases and will get them to you as quickly as we can. Have a Great Day! Sherry Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst 1. FLD2005-01005,SGN2005-01016 & Comp Landscape Adams Mark Hotel - 430 S Gullfview (Planner: Wayne Wells) 2. FLD2005-01007 & Comp Landscape - Ambiance on White Sands - 15 Avalon (Planner: Wayne Wells) 3. FLD2005-01016, TDR2005-01017 & Comp Landscape - Sunspree - 715 S. Gulfview Blvd (Planner: Wayne Wells) 4. FLD2004-0201 1 A, PLT2004-00007 - Townhome Manors - 2520 Sunset Point Road (Planner: Mike Reynolds) 5. FLD2005-01008 - Clearwater Yacht Club - 830 Bayway Blvd (Planner: Marc Mariano) 6. FLD2005-01009 - Robert Pennock - 665 Bay Esplanade (Planner: Marc Mariano) 7. FLD2005-01012 & Comp Landscape - 200 Skiff Point (Planner: Marc Mariano) 8. FLD2005-01010 - Bay Harbor - 600 Bayway Blvd - (Planner: John Schodtler) I, ? J /rJy?JGdXR & 0 '? ?yZG11 ?- .fire ?uY1`d ??he, ai? ?;-7,Oi 6 )7 0 2.50 pm Case Number: FLD2005-0105 -- 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): M S P A gcquisitio y Ii ! O C/O Morgan Stanley Re Funds New York, Ny 10036 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire P O Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757-1368 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-462-0365, E-MAIL: timj@jpfirm.com Location: 2.44 acres located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive. Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217-room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units are permitted today) and for height to allow the existing 155-foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use with an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 203 spaces (existing), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Comprehensive Sign Program approval, under the provisions of Section 3-1807 (SGN2005-01016). Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Continental Towers Association(s): Cleawater, F133767 675 S Gulfview #1002 TELEPHONE: 727-449-9189, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: fandjnassif@webtv.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff. Wayne Wells, Mark Parry, Scott Rice, Ann Blackburn Applicant/Rep: Ed Armstrong, Jayne Sears, Robert Pergolizzi The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I . The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1) A separate right-of-way permit is needed prior to construction of brick paver sidewalk. Applicant is cautioned that City Beach Walk plan calls for removal/replacement of all sidewalk in this area in the near future. Contact Don Melone (727.562.4798) for permit information. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . Please submit sea turtle friendly lighting design and installation details prior to building permit (per Development Standard Code; Section 3-1302-D and City Or. No. 6928-02) Fire: This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. No issue. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 3, 2005 - Page 33 Landscaping: . • 1 . Provide plan to enhance existing landscape to the maximum extent practical. Parks and Recreation: 1 , No issues - since it appears there is no change to number of units and building coverage. Stormwater: 1 . 1) No Issues. Solid Waste: No Comments ' Traffic Engineering: 1 , 1. Show on the architectural site plan City standard dimensions for garage parking stalls and drive aisles. (Community Development Code Section 3-1402.) 2. Provide 5 additional disabled parking spaces to compy with the Florida Accessibility Code For Building Construction Chapter 11 Section 11-4.1.2. 3. Provide on the architectural site plan arrows to show direction of travel for the parking garage. 4. Provide a diagram showing a standard passenger car (18' long) making the turns at all corners of the parking garage. The turning vehicle must not encroach in the opposing lane. 5. Where do employees and guests park? 6. Parking Study: The parking study did not take into the consideration the elimination of the public parking facilities due to the Beach Walk Project. 7. Parking Study: Staff has concerns that the study did not give an average occupancy usage of the municipal lot because of the study was conducted during the month of January (off peak season) and did not take into account the occupancy usage in the peak seasons. 8. Where will the tour buses, shuttle vans and/or taxis stage? 9. Provide height of canopy in the porte-cochere area (must meet minimum clear vertical height of 8'2"). 10. Provide dimensions for parking spaces and drive aisles, specifically in the porte-cochere area. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 3, 2005 - Page 34 I . The property is Ad Tourist District and Open Space/Recreationftrict. It appears that the zoning line is at the seawall line. Based on your square footage amounts of submerged land (25,483 sf; 0.585 acre), the upland area is 1.859 acres. Cannot count submerged land area within density calculations. Provide calculations as to upland area only (116.729 rooms/acre). Provide density calculations in the Site Data Table. Revise the land area to indicate the square footage and acreage for that area zoned Tourist District and for that zoned Open Space/Recreation District in the Site Data Table. Indicate both zoning districts within Site Data Table. Revise Exhibit "B" where appropriate for upland area/acreage and density. 2. Unclear why a Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted. Describe what reductions are being requested, prompting the submission. 3 . Provide a list of proposed improvements to the property. 4. 3/7/05 & 2/22/05 - WW Provide an estimated cost of repairs and improvements. Provide the assessed value of the BUILDING (not land and building) per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser current information. In accordance with Section 6-103.E, if the damage is 50% or more of the assessed value of the structure (which it has been acknowledged to be), then this request (Termination of Status of Nonconformity) is the only way to retain the. existing number of units, otherwise the Code requires the the use (density) to conform to today's standard. If less than 50%, then permits to repair or restore must be submitted within six months of the date of the damage. 5 . 3/3/05 - WW Is the restaurant an accessory use to the hotel? If so, then no additional parking is required for the restaurant. The hotel has more units (217) than provided parking (217 spaces required; only 203 provided). Parking Study needs to address the reduction for the hotel only. 2/22/05 - WW Parking required for a restaurant in the Tourist District is a range from 7 - 15 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Proposal, including the Site Data Table and the Parking Study, utilizes the seven spaces per 1,000 square feet for analysis and for the parking reduction. This is incorrect. Use the 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet for calculation of required parking and for analysis. Revise the Site Data Table, Sheet A2 (and delta of 94 spaces), the Parking Study and application to indicate 80 spaces required for the restaurant and 297 spaces overall required. Provide justification for the parking reduction down to 203 spaces. 6. Unclear how the building/lobby is being remodeled to add a 5,300 square-foot restaurant without adding square footage to the building. What is in the 5,300 square feet now? 7. Parking Study - On Page 3, first paragraph, last sentence, it states that parking will be increased, yet the site plan (Sheet 1/5) indicates that EXISTING and PROPOSED parking is 203 spaces. How is parking being increased? Also revise last sentence on Page 5. 8 . Provide in Site Data Table the total paved area (vehicular use area) that is outside of the parking garage, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet. If greater than 4,000 square feet, must provide at least 10% interior landscape area. 9. If interior landscape area is required, depict by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas. 10. Letter to SWFWMD states there will be a reduction of pavement of 275 square feet, with the amount of green space/open space increasing by 465 square feet and the decrease of impervious area by 465 square feet. Where is the 190 square feet reduction of impervious surface occurring? 11 . Unclear on Sheet 115 that there is an increase of IMpervious by 465 square feet, not PERVIOUS. Pervious should be 33,808 sf; impervious should be 72,692 sf. Revise. 12 . Show all required sight triangles and waterfront sight triangles. 13 . Sheet L1.2 - maximum height of fence within waterfront sight triangle is four feet (non-opaque). 14. Sheet L1.2 - maximum height of fence within sight visibility triangle is 30-inches. 15 . Sheet L1.2 - provide greater detail and setbacks to proposed extended pool deck and proposed arbors. 16. Sheet L1.1 - unclear where handicap route is going to on north side of property. Ensure this is in compliance with Beach Walk improvements. Easement needed onto public property (?). 17 . Provide sidewalk within right-of-way in conformance with Beach Walk (10 feet wide with trees) for entire frontage. 18. Sheet L1.2 - unclear what the diagonally striped area is at northwest corner of building. Advise/revise. 19. Provide typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 3, 2005 - Page 35 20. Sheet L2.1 - appears that hedging along north property line will be planted on City property. Explain. 21 . Sheet A-1 - provide the number of seats in the restaurant and the number of seats in the sidewalk cafe. Sidewalk cafe will be required to meet the Code requirements of Section 3-201.C. Submit Sidewalk cafe application. 22. Sheet A-3 - guest rooms are transient accommodation units - not "residential units." Revise language. Revise density based on 1.859 acres (116.729 rooms/acre). 23 . Provide the color of the fabric awning on the west side of the building. 24. Any reconstruction of the tiki bars on the west side of the building must meet a 20-foot setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) OR include in request as a reduction to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL. 25 . Sheet 4/5 - monument sign design not that proposed under the Comprehensive Sign Program. Revise. 26. Comprehensive Sign Program - a. Maximum height of freestanding sign in the Tourist District is six feet (not 6-8"). Revise. b. Freestanding sign must include site address. Revise. c. Revise data table for directional sign. Sign shown in 1' x 5' (5 square feet), not 20 square feet as indicated. d. Cannot count north side of building facade as lot frontage, as it is not facing a street. Revise. e. Cannot count 210 feet of public parking depth as lot frontage. Revise. f Provide colors of signs (freestanding, attached and directional). g. Provide Page 5/5 of the application. 27. 3/3/05 - WW Provide the height of the residential building to the south and the distance separation between this building and the residential building to the south. 28 . Revise Page 5 of Exhibit "B" - Page 48 of Beach by Design only depicts two (not three) condominium buildings south of the Adams Mark hotel. 29. Revise the application and responses to criteria appropriately regarding the reduction to parking requested. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 4/19/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 3/10/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 3, 2005 - Page 36 Message 119 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 1:30 PM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Subject: RE: Adams Mark There is a separate application. If it isn't on our website, either you can pick up here or I can fax it to you. No additional fee. -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:39 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Tim A. Johnson Subject: Adams Mark Wayne, is there a separate application for the sidewalk cafe? I don't see one on your website. If not, which app. do I use? Flex. dev.? and what is the fee? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 2/28/2005 -e • 2.50 pm Case Number: FLD2005-01005 -- 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD • Unfi Owner(s): M S P A Acquisition Ii C/O Morgan Stanley Re Funds New York, Ny 10036 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email 3.3.or SRC Representative: Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire P O Box 1368 CiMMOV44A Clearwater, F133757-1368 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-462-0365, E-MAIL: timj@jpfirm.com Location: 2.44 acres located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Hamden Drive. Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217-room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units are permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use with an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 297 to 203 spaces (existing), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Comprehensive Sign Program approval, under the provisions of Section 3-1807 (SGN2005-01016). Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Continental Towers Association(s): Cleawater, F133767 675 S Gulfview #1002 TELEPHONE: 727-449-9189, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: fandjnassif@webtv.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Mark Parry, Scott Rice, Ann Blackburn, Rick Albee Applicant/Rep: Tim Johnson, Jayne Sears, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1) A separate right-of-way permit is needed prior to construction of brick paver sidewalk. Applicant is cautioned that City Beach Walk plan calls for removal/replacement of all sidewalk in this area in the near future. Contact Don Melone (727.562.4798) for permit information. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . Please submit sea turtle friendly lighting design and installation details prior to building permit (per Development Standard Code; Section 3-1302-D and City Or. No. 6928-02) Fire: This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. 2. No issue. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 3, 2005 - Page 35 Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stormwater: 1 . 1) No Issues. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Show on the architectural site plan City standard dimensions for garage parking stalls and drive aisles. (Community DEvelopment Code Section 3-1402.) 2. Provide 5 additional disabled parking spaces to compy with the Florida Accessibility Code For Building Construction Chapter 11 Section 11-4.1.2. 3. Provide on the architectural site plan arrows to show direction of travel for the parking garage. 4. Provide a diagram showing a standard passenger car (18' long) making the turns at all corners of the parking garage. The turning vehicle must not encroach in the opposing lane. 5. Where do employees and guests park? 6. Parking Study: The parking study did not take into the consideration the elimination of the public parking facilities due to the Beach Walk Project. 7. Parking Study:. Staff has concerns that the study did not give an average occupancy usage of the municipal lot because of the study was conducted during the month of January (off peak season) and did not take into account the occupancy usage in the peak seasons. 8. Where will the tour buses, shuttle vans and/or taxis stage? 9. Provide height of canopy in the porte-cochere area (must meet minimum clear vertical height of 8'2"). 10. Provide dimensions for parking spaces and drive aisles, specifically in the porte-cochere area. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 3, 2005 - Page 36 1 . The property is zoned Tourist District and Open Space/Recreation Ifstrict. It appears that the zoning line is at the seawall line. Based on your square footage amounts of submerged land (25,483 sf; 0.585 acre), the upland area is 1.859 acres. Cannot count submerged land area within density calculations. Provide calculations as to upland area only (116.729 rooms/acre). Provide density calculations in the Site Data Table. Revise the land area to indicate the square footage and acreage for that area zoned Tourist District and for that zoned Open Space/Recreation District in the Site Data Table. Indicate both zoning districts within Site Data Table. Revise Exhibit "B" where appropriate for upland area/acreage and density. 2. Unclear why a Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted. Describe what reductions are being requested, prompting the submission. 3 . Provide a list of proposed improvements to the property. 4. Provide an estimated cost of repairs and improvements. Provide the assessed value of the BUILDING (not land and building) per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser current information. In accordance with Section 6-103.E, if the damage is 50% or more of the assessed value of the structure, this request cannot be processed, as the Code requires the the use (density) to conform to today's standard. If less than 50%, then permits to repair or restore must be submitted within six months of the date of the damage. 5. Parking required for a restaurant in the Tourist District is a range from 7 - 15 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Proposal, including the Site Data Table and the Parking Study, utilizes the seven spaces per 1,000 square feet for analysis and for the parking reduction. This is incorrect. Use the 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet for calculation of required parking and for analysis. Revise the Site Data Table, Sheet A2 (and delta of 94 spaces), the Parking Study and application to indicate 80 spaces required for the restaurant and 297 spaces overall required. Provide justification for the parking reduction down to 203 spaces. 6. Unclear how the building/lobby is being remodeled to add a 5,300 square-foot restaurant without adding square footage to the building. What is in the 5,300 square feet now? 7. Parking Study - On Page 3, first paragraph, last sentence, it states that parking will be increased, yet the site plan (Sheet 1/5) indicates that EXISTING and PROPOSED parking is 203 spaces. How is parking being increased? Also revise last sentence on Page 5. 8. Provide in Site Data Table the total paved area (vehicular use area) that is outside of the parking garage, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet. If greater than 4,000 square feet, must provide at least 10% interior landscape area. 9. If interior landscape area is required, depict by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas. 10. Letter to SWFWMD states there will be a reduction of pavement of 275 square feet, with the amount of green space/open space increasing by 465 square feet and the decrease of impervious area by 465 square feet. Where is the 190 square feet reduction of impervious surface occurring? 11 . Unclear on Sheet 115 that there is an increase of IMpervious by 465 square feet, not PERVIOUS. Pervious should be 33,808 sf; impervious should be 72,692 sf. Revise. 12 . Show all required sight triangles and waterfront sight triangles. 13 . Sheet L1.2 - maximum height of fence within waterfront sight triangle is four feet (non-opaque). 14. Sheet L1.2 - maximum height of fence within sight visibility triangle is 30-inches. 15 . Sheet L1.2 - provide greater detail and setbacks to proposed extended pool deck and proposed arbors. 16. Sheet L1.1 - unclear where handicap route is going to on north side of property. Ensure this is in compliance with Beach Walk improvements. Easement needed onto public property (?). 17 . Provide sidewalk within right-of-way in conformance with Beach Walk (10 feet wide with trees) for entire frontage. 18. Sheet L1.2 - unclear what the diagonally striped area is at northwest corner of building. Advise/revise. 19. Provide typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures. 20. Sheet L2.1 - appears that hedging along north property line will be planted on City property. Explain. 21 . Sheet A-1 - provide the number of seats in the restaurant and the number of seats in the sidewalk cafe. Sidewalk cafe will be required to meet the Code requirements of Section 3-201.C. Submit Sidewalk cafe application. 22. Sheet A-3 - guest rooms are transient accommodation units - not "residential units." Revise language. Revise density based on 1.859 acres (116.729 rooms/acre). 23 . Provide the color of the fabric awning on the west side of the building. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 3, 2005 - Page 37 • 24. Any reconstruction of the tiki bars on the west side of the building must meet a 20-foot setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) OR include in request as a reduction to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL. 25 . Sheet 4/5 - monument sign design not that proposed under the Comprehensive Sign Program. Revise. 26. Comprehensive Sign Program - a. Maximum height of freestanding sign in the Tourist District is six feet (not 6'-8"). Revise. b. Freestanding sign must include site address. Revise. c. Revise data table for directional sign. Sign shown in V x 5'(5 square feet), not 20 square feet as indicated. d. Cannot count north side of building facade as lot frontage, as it is not facing a street. Revise. e. Cannot count 210 feet of public parking depth as lot frontage. Revise. f. Provide colors of signs (freestanding, attached and directional). g. Provide Page 515 of the application. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 4/19/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 3/10/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 3, 2005 - Page 38 /_Z•?•o ?/?ylC. -! I I?? j? G ?• ? /C_;C? ?i2o Mm e Pinellas County Property Appoer Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 041 Page 2 of 6 07 / 29 / 15 / 52330 / 000 / 0330 04-Feb-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:43:18 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales M S P A ACQUISITION II OBK: 13283 OPG: 2290 C/O MORGAN STANLEY RE FUNDS 1585 BROADWAY 37TH FLR NEW YORK NY 10036-8200 EVACUATION ZONE: A Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 430 S GULFUIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 12/2,003 13,28312,290 20,138,200 (U) I 1925: Book 013 Pgs 012-013 0 /1,977 4,591/1,704 5,125,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,972 3,7881 655 1,699,500 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,970 3,4001 556 890,000 (Q) U 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 16,100,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 16,100,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 16,100,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Gulf Of Mexico Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 369,807.34 1) 255 x 314 90.00 80, 070.00 S Special Tax 00 2) 0 x 0 11000. 00 .49 A 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 369, 807. 34 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 369, 807. 34 Short Legal LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUB LOTS 33, 34 & 35 & PT OF Description LOT 36 & SUBM LAND ON W PER O.R. 765/542 ALL DESC Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 2/4/2005 Pinellas County Property Appaer Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 040 Page 3 of 6 Property and Land Use Code descriptions . Buil..d..in2 _1.. . Building 2. Building #1 07 / 29 / 15 / 52380 / 000 / 0330 :01 04-Feb-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:43:41 Commercial Card 01 of, 2 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel > 3 St Property Address: 430 S GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 S-truc-t ural E 1E3miB n-t Fm- Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 645 Bath Tile Floor + Half Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,974 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Ar s a s Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 128,286 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 1,450 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 3,423 9) .00 0 4) Canopy .25 1,050 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Description Dimensions Price 1) COHC PAVE 24000 3.00 2) ELEU PASS 13STOP 30,000.00 3) POOL 1137 60,000.00 4) SPA/JAC/HT 13'DI 10,000.00 5) ELEU STOP 13STOP 3,500.00 6) GAZEBO 222SF 25.00 Units Value RCD Year 24,000 72,000 72,000 999 3 90,000 36,000 1.974 1 60,000 24,000 1,974 1 10,000 4,000 1,974 39 136,500 54,600 1,974 222 5,550 4,270 1,996 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 194,870 Building #2 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-ser3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r--.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 2/4/2005 Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 040 Page 4 of 6 07 1 29 1 15 1 52380 1 000 I 0330 :02 04-Feb-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:43:18 Commercial Card 02 of 2 Improvement Type: Parking Garage Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 Structural E1?msnts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish None Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 0 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,974 Effective Age 20 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area i. 00 92,000 7) . 00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Cammerci.al Extra FiBatur(3s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) FENCE 50LF 8.00 50 400 320 1,997 2) FIRESPRINK 12000 1.75 92,000 161,000 144,900 1,996 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 145,220 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ®o®o http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 2/4/2005 Pinellas County Property Appoer Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 04 Page 5 of 6 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=l &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 2/4/2005 Page 6 of 6 t Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 07 29 15 52380 000 0 0 r: 41 E } ' l a " sA - yr M K N e iA k , Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back t9._Search..:Pav.. An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &c=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 2/4/2005 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting -Engineering Planning Transportation .Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 _ Clearwater, FL 33760 ; Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 January 13,1005 JAN 1 ? 2005 r Mr: Bennett Elbo, Traffic Engineer r .City of Clearwater .? u< PIANNi d? 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, #220 .Ctl,X.r - ?- -- ' Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Adams Mark Hotel (#430 S. Gulfview Blvd.) Dear Mr. Elbo: Per our meeting held January 11, 2005 and my follow-up telephone discussion with Chip Gerlock I am submitting this revised methodology for conducting the traffic and parking study for the above-referenced project Traffic Study The traffic study methodology proposed in my January 3, 2005 letter was modified to include.the impacts of the Clearwater Grande project (#655 S. Gulfview Boulevard) as background traffic: Parking Study" " As discussed with Mr. Gerlock the parking study methodology will be revised to include the hours as shown below: Friday 10 AM to 4 PM and 6 PM to 10 PM Saturday 10 AM to 4 PM and 6PM to 10 PM Sunday 10 AM to 4 PM and 6 PM to 9 PM Since y, V " ,, .? Robert Pergolizzi, Cc: , Chip Gerlock? Dan Meacham Mike Kubick Tim Johnson 04-086 E CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, April 19, 2005, beginning at 1:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (cont. from 1/18/05) LBJ, LLC (BJE, Inc.) are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (proposed parking garage and attached dwellings in conjunction with existing retail sales) with a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 4.77 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 2.91 ft (to building), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), from 10 ft to 1.74 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 2.6 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 0.5 ft (to building), to increase the building height from 35 ft to 70 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16 ft for rooftop pavilion (from roof deck) and to permit a building within the visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C., and a reduction to the width of foundation landscaping along Poinsettia Avenue from 5 ft to 4.77 ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights of 4 units from 656 Bayway Blvd, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. [Proposed Use: Mixed use (4 level parking garage with 355 parking spaces and 28 attached dwelling units [condominium] in conjunction with 37,940 sq ft of existing retail sales)] at 483 Mandalay Ave, Clearwater Beach Park, I" Add Replat, Blk A, Lots 2-7, & 15 ft Vac Alley on W & Lot 8. FLD2004-09072/TDR2005-01015 2. (cont. from 3/22/05) Liberty Bank (Liberty Realty Group) are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit retail sales and service (bank) and offices in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 to 23.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft 20 ft (to building), an increase to building height from 25 ft to 28 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3.33 ft for parapet (from roof deck) and an additional 8.83 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to required parking from 38 to 35 spaces and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street (Gulf to Bay), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with a reduction to front (east) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence along the west and south sides of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.G. (Proposed Use: Bank and office space) at 1611 Gulf to Bay Blvd, Longview Sub, Lots 3-4, 19-21. FLD2004-11080 3. (cont. from 3/22/05) Haddon House Inn, Inc. (Haddon House of Clearwater, LLC) are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to building) and from 25 ft to 4.2 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 8 ft from the Coastal Construction Control Line (to pool deck), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5.9 ft (to building), from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pool deck) and from 10 ft to 2 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the 0 0 side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3.2 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10. ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), and an increase to height from 30 ft to 64 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4.16 ft for perimeter parapet (from roof deck) and an additional 15.83 ft for a rooftop pavilion (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F; (2) a reduction to the landscape buffer along Idlewild Street from 10 ft to 4.2 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 10 ft to 5.9 ft (to building), from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pool deck) and from 10 ft to 2 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 ft to 3.2 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the eastern property line from 10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; (3) Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Sec 4-1403. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (14 condominiums)] at 12 Idlewild St, Clearwater Beach Rev, Blk3, Lots 1, 13-15 & W 1/2 of Lot 12. FLD2004-10076 4. George C Clark Investments (Global Financial Investments, LLC / Equity Investments, LLC / KB Home - Tampa, LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval with reduction of the front (east) setback along Lawson Rd from 25 ft to 18 ft (to building), from 25 ft to 14 ft (to pavement), reductions to front (west) setback along Lawson Rd from 25 ft to 7 ft (to patios), from 25 ft to 11 ft to (building) and from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the front (south) setback along Blackburn St from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), and a reduction to a landscape buffer from 10 ft to 7 ft (to patios) along the east side of Lawson Rd, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-304.G. and Preliminary Plat approval for 248 lots, and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: A residential development of 248 attached dwellings) at 2520 Sunset Point Rd, Blackburn's Sub, Pt of Lots 10-12 & Vac St. FLD2004-02011A/PLT2004-00007A 5. Bay Harbor, LLC (Baywatch Suites, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval to construct a 1,376 sq ft multi-use dock facility to provide 8 slips as an amenity to 19 condominium units. The request includes an increase of the width of the dock from 75 percent of the lot width (135 ft) to 77 percent of the lot width (139 ft), and a reduction of the side (west) setbacks from 17.98 ft to 10.3 ft to the dock, per Sec 3-601.C.3. (Proposed Use: Construct a multi-use dock of 1,376 sq ft for 8 slips) at 600 Bayway Blvd, Bayside Sub No. 5, Blk A, Lots 6-8 & Riparian Rts. FLD2005-01010 +A' 6 MSPA Acquisition H, LP is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for \A) N V density to allow the continuation of an existing 217-room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units are permitted today) and for height to allow the existing 155-ft high building (where a maximum height of 150 ft is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use with a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to patio/pool decking and tiki bars) and to allow patio/pool decking seaward (westward) of the Coastal Construction Control Line, an increase to building height from 35 ft to 155 ft (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; (3) a reduction to the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval, under the provisions of Sec 3-1807 (SGN2005-01016). (Proposed Use: Retain existing 217-room overnight accommodation use) at 430 South Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub, Lots 33- 35 & Pt of Lot 36 & Subm Land on W. FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 7. Sunspree Green, LLC is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density for the existing 105-room hotel tower, located on 2.383 acres (density to be converted to 78 • • dwelling units); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north along S. Gulfview Blvd.) from 15 ft to 11.88 ft (to security guard house) and from 15 ft to 6.42 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Gulf Blvd.) from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 4.29 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to boardwalk), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 150 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11 - 21 ft for decorative mansard architectural embellishments, an increase to fence height within the front setback from 6 ft to 7 ft and a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; (3) Transfer of Development Rights of 10 units from 41 Devon Dr and 3 units from the Sandpearl project located generally at 500 Mandalay Ave, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402 (TDR2005-01017); and (4) Preliminary Plat for 1 lot (PLT2005-00002). [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (149 dwelling units)] at 715 S. Gulfyiew Blvd, Bayside Shores, Blk D, Lots 1-2 & Accreted Land to S. FLD2005- 01016/TDR2005-01017/PLT2005-00002 8. Panaroma on Clearwater Beach, LLC is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (15 overnight accommodation units, to be converted to 11 dwelling units, plus 8 existing dwelling units), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a total of 15 attached dwellings in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District and Tourist (T) District with a reduction in the T District from 10,000 sq ft to 4,350 sq ft, a reduction to lot width in the T District from 100 ft to 50 ft, reductions to the front (north along Avalon St - MHDR District) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to building) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the front (south along Kendall St - T District) from 15 ft to 10 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (west - MHDR District) from 10 ft to 7 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (west - T District) from 10 ft to 3 ft (to building and pavement), a reduction to the rear (south - MHDR District) from 15 ft to 10 ft (to building), an increase to building height in the MHDR District from 30 ft and in the T District from 35 ft to 52.67 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 3.67 ft (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project in the MHDR District and as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the T District, under the provisions of Secs 2404.17 and 2-803.C; and (3) Reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer in the MHDR District from 10 ft to 7 ft (to building), as a Comprehensive Landscape Plan, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (15 dwelling units)] at 15 - 27 Avalon St and 16 Kendall St, Clearwater Beach Rev, Blk7, Lots 6-8, 14 & Pt of Lot 5. FLD2005-01007 9. Robert M Pennock, Melodie A Ferguson, Robert M Pennock II THE REM, & Melodie A Ferguson THE REM are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 5 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 51 ft; an increase in height from 35 ft to 59 ft to top of roof deck, an additional 3.5 ft to the top of mansard roof (from roof deck) and an additional 11.75 ft for stair/elevator tower (from roof deck) and architectural embellishment; a reduction in the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 3.5 ft to pool and 18 ft to building as a Flexible Development project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 803.B. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (5 dwelling units)] at 665 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lot 6. FLD2005-01009 10. Clearwater Yacht Club, Inc. is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 3 story, 18,500 sq ft Yacht Club with offices, exercise room, restaurant and parking garage structure, with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft to pavement and 4 ft to building structure; to permit a building within the sight visibility triangles along Bayway Blvd, a reduction of rear. (north) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to paver deck and 18 ft to building and an increase in building height from 25 ft to 46.5 ft to mean roof height, as a Comprehensive Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.E. (Proposed Use: Marina) at 830 Bayway Blvd, Bayside Sub No 6 Unit A, Blk D, Lots 5-11 Incl. FLD2005-01008 11. Skiff Point of Clearwater, LLC is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 15 attached dwelling units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft to building and from 25 ft to 3 ft to pavement; a reduction to the side (north and south) setbacks from 10 ft to 6.5 ft to building and 5 ft to parking; a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 5 ft to pool and 7.5 ft to parking; and an increase in height from 30 ft to 49 ft to roof deck and additional 4 ft for parapet (from roof deck to top of parapet) and an additional 16 ft for elevator overrun (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, in the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) / Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District under the provisions of Secs 2-404(F) and 2-1602(C). [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (15 dwelling units)] at 200 and 201 Skiff Point, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 5-A, Lots 35-36. FLD2005-01012 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. 5 days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 04/03/05 W"n e, We, 11S -- FOUR FORTY WEST ASSN INC 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD STE 203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 GERBER, GLYDWELL TRUST GERBER, MARGARET TRUST 831 BAYVIEW DR LAKE GENEVA WI 53147 - 3593 BAILEY, BEVERLY BAILEY, H AUBREY 103 KINGSBURY WOODS MIDDLESBORO KY 40965 - HANNAH, HUGH H III HANNAH, JAYNE F PO BOX 21281 CHATTANOOGA TN 37424 - 0281 ARENSKY,ARKANDY THE ARENSKY, ELIZABETH THE 2506 STONEBRIGHE LN NORTHBROOK IL 60062 - ALCIATORE, GASTON ALCIATORE, NANCY J 440 GULFVIEW BLVD #402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2510 MICH, PATRICIA J 140 LN 570A LK JAMES FREMONT IN 46737 - BALOW, RONALD D THE FOLINO, JOHN F 27989 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 4906 L13? C??=v ?evJ- F l? 7lJO?- ? ??? ANASTASOPOULOS, GEORGE E BLOSSER, ROBERT L ANASTASOPOULOS, EKATERINI BLOSSER, JANE A 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 201 583 EAST ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 CARLISLE PA 17013 - 1335 CARAYANNOPOULOS, GEORGE L CARAYANNOPOULOS, MARGARET P 16 CHURCHILL RD WINCHESTER MA 01890 - 1008 KATSETOS, STEVE G 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 ACOSTA, JOHN F 609 OLIVER CT NORTH BRUNSWICK NJ 08902 - 4544 GADDIS, SUSAN ALLEN, NANCY 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 BALOW, RONALD D THE FOLINO, JOHN F 27989 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 4906 BARRY, DONALD J THE BARRY, JAMES J THE 743 MARKGRAFS LAKE DRAW WOODBURY MN 55129 - 8586 G T LEISURE CORP 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2510 COLEMAN, WARREN P 1860 JANDALE TROY MI 48085 - THOMAS, NABIL S THOMAS, SAMIA 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SMERLING, GEORGETTE 38 OLD DAIRY RD TRUMBULL CT 06611 - 4954 CHAMPAGNE, ROLAND J CHAMPAGNE, HELEN L 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SCOURTES, GEORGE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2509 SHELDAHL, ERIC A 3815 NW 109TH ST URBANDALE IA 50322 - 2022 MEAD, PAUL MEAD, SANDRA 31 LINDROP ST LONDON SW6 2QU 00003 - GREAT BRITAIN PALERMO, PAMELA J PALERMO, LOUIS M 1855 JESSICA RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1508 T AS, ANNA THE 1616 SHERIDAN RD # 10G WILMETTE IL 60091 - 1851 SORRENTINO, ROSA THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #505 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 SELVONEN, LINDA J SHIRSAT, SHAM S FLYNN, JERRY C JR 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 506 SHIRSAT, MADHAVI S 260 CHEESTANA WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 28 CAMBRIDGE DR LOUDON TN 37774 - 2527 OAK BROOK IL 60523 - 1705 USHER, CEDRIC USHER, SHEILA 40 CASTLE AVE CLONTARF DUBLIN 3 00003 - IRELAND WOOLUM, KERRY L WINKLER, DWIGHT L 528 KENTUCKY AVE PINEVILLE KY 40977 - 1343 AYO, DENNIS H 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 KAMBEROS, GEORGE G KAMBEROS, EUGENIA 10346 S LAPORTE AVE OAK LAWN IL 60453 - 4733 GUHL, PATRICIA J TR 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 SUMMER, CLAIRE D TRUST 7635 EADS AVE # 106 LA JOLLA CA 92037 - GHALY, RAMSIS F 11136 INDIAN WOODS DR INDIAN HEAD PARK IL 60525 - WILLARD, GILLIAN M 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2514 KONTRAS, STELLA B THE 4725 DIERKER RD COLUMBUS OH 43220 - 2942 DAMJANOVIC, TEREZO DAMJANOVIC, MARY 515 PARKHOLLOW LN PHILADELPHIA PA 19111 - 1365 ASKALANI LIVING TRUST ASKALANI, SANAA M BEN 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 HAJ, FRIDON ESMKHANI, MOJTABA 10443 GREENDALE DR TAMPA FL 33626 - WEEDEN, SAM W WEEDEN, BETTIE I 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 SCHNEIDER, ROGER B SCHNEIDER, LYNETTE V 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #707 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 KUMP, PAUL H KUMP, CORINNE F 610 PRAIRIE ST NORTHFIELD MN 55057 - 2624 ZIELINSKI, DETLEF R ZIELINSKI, MONIKA 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #805 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2513 DEARNBARGER, WILLIAM L 5029 KILLOWEN CT COLUMBUS OH 43230 - 4008 RICKS, WALTER A SR THE RICKS, MILDRED H THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2514 0 GIDARO, ARDO TILFORD, ROSEANNA 16130 WESTON RD KETTLEBY ON LOG 1J0 00030 - CANADA BROTEMARKLE, MARTIN L SR TRUST POST, JO ANN 41130 FOX RUN RD # 509 NOVI MI 48377 - 4814 GUIRGUIS, WILSON I GUIRGUIS, FAIZA F 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 701 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2512 CHRISMAN, ROBERT D CHRISMAN, CAROLEE 3428 ADAMS SHORE DR WATERFORD MI 48329 - 4202 DUNN, RICHARD A COX, PHYLLIS D 3600 CANTERBURY DR JEFFERSONTOWN KY 40299 - 3508 CALDERON, JULIO CALDERON, ROSARIO 9529 S KOL1N AVE OAK LAWN IL 60453 - 3226 LUPIENT, JAMES 750 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 - 1603 PAPAGEORGIOU, DEMETRIOS G PAPAGEORGIOU, LIZA 5310 LONG MEADOW RD BLOOMFIELD HILL MI 48304 - WERTH, KENNETH D WERTH, PAMELA A 120 BARRINGTON CIR ALPENA MI 49707 - 4101 APPLE, JAMES R WEIS, JAY B LUCARELLI, QUIRINO JR PO BOX 310474 WEIS, ERIK J LUCARELLI, RACHEL TAMPA FL 33680 - 0474 2227 7TH ST NW 440 GULFVIEW BLVD # 907 ROCHESTER MN 55901 - 0206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2514 GRATIAS PROPERTIES LLC 1350 NW 138TH ST CLIVE IA 50325 - 8377 MILLER, ALAN H MILLER, MARY G 1174 WAUKAZOO DR HOLLAND MI 49424 - 2637 PAPPAS, KELLIE 100 FLAX MILL RD BRANFORD CT 06405 - 2870 SEURYNCK, ELIZABETH THE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 LOMBARDO, JOSEPH LOMBARDO, JOANNE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 GIOTAKIS, WILLIAM C GIOTAKIS, MARIA 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - GEDDES, C ALEXANDER 28 CRAYFORD DR SCARBOROUGH ON M1W 3136 00030- CANADA CAMPBELL, JERRY D CAMPBELL, FELICIA N PO BOX 320500 FLINT MI 48532 - BARTA, GYORGY BARTA, ZSUZSA 151 ORANGEWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7585 0 QUERUBIN, KATHERINE 627 SAXONY BLVD ST PETERSBURG FL 33716 - HANDLEY, ROBERT M 1501 GULF BLVD #604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2903 TRUHAN, JOSEPH G 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1007 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 .WARD, THOMAS G 2817 ROEHAMPTON CLOSE TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 8426 PIAZZA, LENO P ZORZIT, MARK J 443 ROWELL AVE SAULT ST MARIE ON P6C 5L3 00030 - BOESEN, ROBERT J BOESEN, CHRISTIE J 475 ALICES RD WAUKEE IA 50263 - 9637 GOEMAN, EMMA K THE KOCALIS, ANTHONY J 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1102 KOCALIS, IRENE A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 722 KENT RD KENILWORTH IL 60043 - 1032 LOCKART, HENRY C SCHWARTZ, JOHN LOCKART, GLENDA K 145 MARINA DEL RAY CT 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2516 SIDKY, EMIL Y SIDKY, SONYA M 5451 S WOODLAWN AVE # 3 CHICAGO IL 60615 - 5209 MAKAR, KYRILLOS B MAKAR, ZEIZAF I 669 TOMOKA DR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5856 MC CLURE, JAMES J JR THE PHELPS, K JEAN THE 1 CALVIN CIR # C309 EVANSTON IL 60201 - 1957 DIONNE, RICHARD M DIONNE, VICKI I 4736 ATKINS RD CLYDE TWP MI 48049 - 4504 RISER, RICHARD F THE 1500 BURKHOLDER DR ALPENA MI 49707 - 8165 YOWELL, KENNETH P YOWELL, CINDY W 132 ALBEMARLE DR PENLLYN PA 19422 - 1127 STAMIS, CONSTANTINE STAMIS, ETHEL R 505 MANAWA TR MT PROSPECT IL 60056 - 3719 TIDD, JAMES A TIDD, VICKI A 5861 ROGERS RD JAMESTOWN OH 45335 - 8713 JURACKA, PATRICIA D'IPPOLITO, ANTHONY ARQUILLA, MICHAEL P THE PRICE, JOSEPH T D'IPPOLITO, LOUISE 1253 RICHFIELD CT 9180 SOUTH RD # C 2925 CATHERINE DR WOODRIDGE IL 60517 - 7709 PALOS HILLS IL 60465 - 2131 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 2102 ZAMMIT, ALFRED G ZAMMIT, DAVID 1900 THE COLLEGE WAY # 1805 MISSISSAUGA ON L51, 5Y8 00030 - RACHOWICZ, EDWARD RACHOWICZ, MAE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1502N CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 STACH, ISABELLE M 2134 ANDREWS CT DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 4839 MC GEE, JOHN P PO BOX 3455 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 -8455 CALOUDIS, MARY THE 4078 CARROLL BLVD UNIVERSITY HT OH 44118 - 4516 TIKRITI, GARY D THE 2849 CHANCERY LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1427 POLSTON, STEPHEN M POLSTON, JEAN M 440 N GULFVIEW BLVD # 1701 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MORRILL, DANIEL MORRILL, SANDY 2029 W MANITOU DR OWOSSO MI 48867 - 8727 NATIONAL CONTRACTS INC 33920 US HIGHWAY 19 N # 155 PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 2619 KALLINIKOS, LOUIS KALLINIKOS, KATINA 128 GRAND AVE ETOBICOKE ON M8Y 2Z5 00030 - • KOPANAKIS, NICK 35518 SCHOOLCRAFT ST LIVONIA MI 48150 - 1214 ROPP, WALTER S 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1503N CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 EKREN, YALCIN EKREN, FILIZ 3061 DEXBERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - BIRA S A APDO 333 PANAMA ZONE 1 00000 - PANAMA MC CAFFERY, MICHAEL G THE MC CAFFERY, MARGARET M THE 46-1 REVERE RD DREXEL HILL PA 19026 - 5328 BAKER, ROBERT E BAKER, ANN E 34 PLEASANT VIEW DR HANOVER PA 17331 - 8855 ANDERSON, JOHN C ANDERSON, REGINA W 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 HENSGEN, CAROL W 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 CONNELL, PETER W 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2520 PALASKY, JON R SR 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 0 MOORE, FRANCIS H MOORE, CLAIRE 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 BATIANIS, THOMAI 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 O'NEIL, JOHN T THE 20 MONAHANSETT RD MASHPEE MA 02649 - 4742 MC DONALD, VIVIAN A MC DONALD, BRENT E 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1602 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2518 DILLMAN, TOM L DILLMAN, SUSAN J 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2519 PANGERE, GEORGIANN M 13010 MONROE PL CROWN POINT IN 46307 - 9588 SEYER CORP 80 MAIN ST MILLVILLE PA 17846 - ARQUILLA, MICHAEL P THE 1253 RICHFIELD CT WOODRIDGE IL 60517 - 7709 WHITE, FREDERICK T WHITE, LINDA M 440 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1806 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2520 SANTOSTEFANO, ROBERT THE 14800 GREEN VIEW RD ORLAND PARK IL 60462 - 1994 BINNS, CRYSTAL A 1938 JARVIS RD COLUMBUS OH 43221 - 2772 SOBIESZCZYK, HARRY A JR SOBIESZCZYK, BARBARA L 581 N 4TH AVE ADDISON IL 60101 - 2273 BANOUB, ATEF BANOUB, AMAL 486 KENT PL W HEMPSTEAD NY 11552 - 3340 BERGER, RALPH F THE RYAN-BERGER, ELIZABETH E THE 7131 ASHVILLE PARK COLUMBUS OH 43235 - 5013 GRIMES, WALTER R 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2522 BREMIS, JAMES J BREMIS, SOPHIE 1177 BROADWAY SOMERVILLE MA 02144 - 1742 PENNINGTON, JANICE THE 450 GULFVIEW BLVD # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2522 SOLIMAN FAMILY ENTERPRISES LLC 7533 JOMEL DR SPRING HILL FL 34607 - 2018 GAERTNER, ADAM GAERTNER, ELISABETH 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 507 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 • FIRETTO, GRACE VIOLA, MARY 500 N 13TH ST NEWARK NJ 07107 - 1318 PONTIKOS, IRENE 193 COUNTRYSIDE DR BROADVIEW HTS OH 44147 - 3415 0 LA POINTE, NORMAND J LA POINTE, LORRAINE J 450 GULFVIEW BLVD #301 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2521 PONTIKOS, IRENE 193 COUNTRYSIDE DR BROADVIEW HTS OH 44147 - 3415 STRAMAGLIA, JOHN SLEDZ, WILLIAM H STRAMAGLIA, JEANNINE L SLEDZ, SHARON R 4025 GOSS 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 307 SCHILLER PARK IL 60176 - 1827 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - LYRAS, LOUIS G LYRAS, KARENA 80 CREED CR CAMPBELL OH 44405 - 1277 SCHULTE, CHARLES W SCHULTE, COLLEEN M 3723 LAKEWOOD SHORES DR HOWELL MI 48843 - 7889 SUTHERLAND, JOHN J SUTHERLAND, PEGGY E 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 JACOB, MICAH M JACOB, MICHAEL B 5526 CABOT ST PORTAGE MI 49002 - CONSTANTINIDES, NICHOLAS S CONSTANTINIDES, MICHAEL 1027 HILLEN ST BALTO MD 21202 - 4132 ORN, DUANE L 5415 BROOKLYN BLVD MINNEAPOLIS MN 55429 - 3359 SCHWALBE, MARTIN E WOOLUM, KAYETTE SCHWALBE, GLENDA J 201 DEAN HILL DR 139 HAMILTON RIVER RD PINEVILLE KY 40977 - LABRADOR NL AOP 1 EO 00030 - CANADA MAIR, ALOIS MAIR, DEBRA A 2903 APPIAN WAY EASTON PA 18040 - 7706 SCHAAF, MICHAEL L MUDIE, AUDREY 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 MATUSZEK, THERESA PROCIUK, THEODORE 140 MANCHESTER DR # 210 BUFFALO GROVE IL 60089 - 2422 CVETETIC, JOSEPH CVETETIC, MARY 5111 ESTES AVE SKOKIE IL 60077 - 3437 BROWN, ALAN C PEARL, PENNY G BRETTSCHNEIDER, WILHELM BROWN, JUNE M 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #603 3050 BYRNWYCK # 209 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #602 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 MAUMEE OH 43537 - 9739 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 GAMBA, WILLIAM C 2062 LAKEVIEW AVE # A BELLMORE NY 11710 - 4244 FINTA, EMERY J THE FINTA, PEGGY K THE 450 GULFVIEW BLVD #608 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 REESE, POLLY C PO BOX 400 MIDDLESBORO KY 40965 - 0400 RYAN-KOUDELKA, DEBORAH A 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2525 GROUT, MARJORIE A THE 9912 CARRINGTON DR KNOXVILLE TN 37923 - 1963 LIMARDI, R J LIMARDI, LAURA 179 ANNADALE DR FAIRFIELD OH 45014 - 5226 ZUGALJ, WON J ZUGALJ, MILKA 1044 E 165TH ST SOUTH HOLLAND IL 60473 - 2573 REED, AUDREY L 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 SAAD, FATHY Z SHENODA, SAMIRA S 2626 DURANT OAKS DR VALRICO FL 33594 - 5932 MUTLU, ULKER 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #908 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 • CLEAVES, ROBERT N 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2524 HOSP, UWE HOSP, INGEBORG A 140 KIMBALL BRIDGE COVE ALPHARETTA GA 30022 - 4791 REESE, POLLY C PO BOX 400 MIDDLESBORO KY 40965 - 0400 KENNY, HARRY E KENNY, SHARON B 155 N HARBOR DR # 4012 CHICAGO IL 60601 - 7371 KNUTSON, BARBARA F THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2525 KARRAS, PAUL G KARRAS, CAROL M 2048 GOVERT DR SCHERERVILLE IN 46375 - 5125 FERGUSON, EDMUND 6133 OAK VALLEY WHITMORE LAKE MI 48189 - 9739 SUESS, BERNARD H 1100 OLD POST RD PERKASIE PA 18944 - 1582 SHERRY, BEATRICE 828 WATER ST MEADVILLE PA 16335 - 3452 SAVOIE, NORMAN SAVOIE, ROSEMARIE OLD MOUNTAIN RD P0BOX331 EASTHAMPTON MA 01027 - • ERKEN, YALCIN EKREN, FILIZ 3061 DOX BERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2003 SIMMONS, JEAN M MC CULLOUGH, GARY S. 857 SUNDANCE CIR OSHAWA ON L1J 8135 00030 - CANADA SCIBA, ROBERT E SCIBA, JANE L 47647 PINE CREEK CT NORTHVILLE MI 48167 - 8527 RAMASWAMY, ASHOK 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2525 LISTES, MARINKO LISTES, NEDJELJKA 2895 CHICOUTIMI LAVAL QC H7E 1132 00030 - CANADA GLISE, JOHN INC 3900 MARKET ST CAMP HILL PA 17011 - 4226 MALATY, KHAIRY A MALATY, EBTISAM K 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #901 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 DENICKE, WILLIS H JR THE DENICKE, ANTONIA M THE PO BOX 628 STEVENS POINT WI 54481 - 0628 PRYOR,CAROL 2346 ROSE GARDEN RD PITTSBURGH PA 15220 - 4029 DICKERSON, BETTY L 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2526 SCIMONE, PETER L SCIMONE, ROSALIE L 18555 ALEXANDER RD WALTON HILLS OH 44146 - 5351 PROKOP, MARILYN M 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1006 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 WECHSLER, RENATE THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 KIRKOWSKI, JOHN A KIRKOWSKI, EDWINA J 134 E SHORE TRL SPARTA NJ 07871 - 2107 WYROZEMSKI, WALTER WYROZEMSKI, MARY 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - BILLINGSLEY, GARY R BILLINGSLEY, TAMERA 6883 N BUCK CREEK SHADES FAIRLAND IN 46126 - 9553 PATSIS, STEVE PATSIS, EMANUEL 157 N ALLEGHANY AVE LINDENHURST NY 11757 - 4129 SHAPPY, WILLIAM A SHAPPY, PATRICIA L 109 CHENEY HILL LN RUTLAND VT 05701 - ORMOND, BRIAN E 1451 LINDENHURST DR CENTERVILLE OH 45459 - 3328 BOLLING, CHRISTOPHER J BOLLING, ALISON J P O BOX 2696 SOUTH PORTLAND ME 04116 - 2696 • JIRKOVSKY, KARL K JIRKOVSKY, CHRISTIANE 450 GULFVIEW BLVD S # 1004 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 HODGES, KEITH L 603-17 ROBINSON ST HAMILTON ON L8P IY6 00030 - CANADA GABRIEL, MAGDI GABRIEL, SOPHIE 15629 BAINTREE WAY MISHAWAKA IN 46545 - 1536 ALEXANDER, ANN W 6200 SW 37TH WAY GAINESVILLE FL 32608 - 5106 YANTEK, MINERVA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1008 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2528 POZIOS, THOEFANIS POZIOS, KOULA 825 MICHIGAN AVE MARYSVILLE MI 48040 - 1404 HOUSTEAU, RAYMOND F GRATIAS PROPERTIES LLC 3620 FAWN DR 1350 NW 138TH ST STE 500 CANFIELD OH 44406 - 9578 CLIVE IA 50325 - GLASBY, ALFRED GLASBY, KIMBERLY 902 BALD EAGLE LAKE RD ORTONVILLE MI 48462 - 8435 DYBA,YOLANDA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2529 BILLINGSLEY, GARY R BILLINGSLEY, TAMERA A 6883 N BUCK CREEK SHADES FAIRLAND IN 46126 - 9553 FLAVAN, JOHN M 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2529 SGOUPIS, JAMES SGOUPIS, ANNE 137 93RD ST BROOKLYN NY 11209 - 6201 FATTOUCH, HANY A FATTOUCH, SAMIA F 5468 PINECREST DR LOCKPORT NY 14094 - 9014 NOVICK, CAROL A 112 LITCHFIELD LN HOUSTON TX 77024 - 6016 1216352 ONTARIO INC 27 HARROWSMITH PL RICHMOND HILL ON L4E 2A1 00030- CANADA LANI, JOSEPH R LANI, CAROLE R 456 WILSON AVE STATEN ISLAND NY 10312 - 3730 ANDERSON, CRAIG S 610 E HINTZ RD ARLINGTON HGTS IL 60004 - 2601 BENSON, RODNEY E SCICCHITANO, ANTHONY F BENSON, KATHLEEN S SCICCHITANO, JANICE M 9702 GULFSTREAM DR 2701 ASTON AVE FISHERS IN 46038 - 9726 PLANT CITY FL 33566 - 9594 n LJ MALO, FOTIOS MALO, ALEXANDRA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 CHESLER, RICHARD A HARVARD, ELIZABETH J 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 MICHALENOICK, CHARLES J MICHALENOICK, CATHERINE D SKYLINE TERRACE CLAREMONT NH 03743 - MAC QUARRIE, RONALD H THE MAC QUARRIE, JOANNE A THE 1400 GULF BLVD # 801 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2830 RUCKNAGEL, MELBA A THE RUCKNAGEL FAMILY TRUST 8812 FOX PARK DR SAINT LOUIS MO 63126 - 2310 GAREL-JONES, PHILIP THE GAREL-JONES, BEATA THE 120 LANDSDOWNE RD S OTTAWA ON KIM ON4 00030 FELL, DONALD G FELL, DIANE M 1744 STANTON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 - 2859 CURTIS, JAMES G CURTIS, JOHN G 343 S MAIN ST ANN ARBOR MI 48104 - 2137 GRATIAS PROPERTIES 1350 NW 138TH ST STE 500 CLIVE IA 50325 -8378 GABRIEL, SAID S GABRIEL, ESMAT A 5 WHITE CEDAR LN HOLMDEL NJ 07733 - 2609 GOGEL, EDWARD V GOGEL, EILEEN 60 ENCLAVE DR WINTER HAVEN FL 33884 - 1326 SHAW, WILLIAM M SHAW, GEORGINA 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1508 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2530 SOLU, EMINE F THE SOLU, SULEYMAN S THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2531 FAHY, MICHAEL FAHY, MARY 16 LARK ST PEARL RIVER NY 10965 - 2815 GABRIEL, SAID S GABRIEL, ESMAT A 5 WHITECEDAR LN HOLMDEL NJ 07733 - 2609 JASTRZEBSKI, LUBOMIR 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2531 DOURDOUREKAS, HELEN 44 COMMONS DR PALOS PARK IL 60464 - 1299 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 0 THOMAS, FRANKLIN J THOMAS, JOYCE E 8364 GOLDEN PRAIRIE DR TAMPA FL 33647 - 3241 IBRAHIM, FAYEZ THE 2647 LAKE SHORE DR NILES MI 49120 - 9513 PENDLEY, CORBETT WAYNE PENDLEY, JANE 464 ADAMS ST DENVER CO 80206 - 4411 SOLU, EMINE F THE SOLU, SULEYMAN S THE 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2531 GABRIEL, FATHY S GABRIEL, TERESA M 2399 HERONWOOD DR BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48302 - 0835 SHELDAHL, ERIC A 3818 NW 109TH ST URBANDALE IA 50322 - MOUNAYER, JOSEPH 12 THORNTN DR DOLLARD DES ORMEAUX PQ H913 1X8 00030 - CANADA PORTER, CHARLES D PORTER, PATRICIA A 15411 OAKWOOD DR URBANDALE IA 50323 - CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 M S P A ACQUISITION II K& P CLEARWATER ESTATE K& P CLEARWATER ESTATE 1585 BROADWAY 37TH FLR LLC LLC NEW YORK NY 10036 - 8200 3105 W WATERS AVE STE 31 3105 W WATERS AVE STE 31 TAMPA FL 33614 - TAMPA FL 33614 - K & P CLEARWATER ESTATE LLC 3105 W WATERS AVE STE 31 TAMPA FL 33614 - CLEARWATER SEASHELL RESORT 28059 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2620 LITTLE, DAVID R 1734 CASEY JONES CT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1701 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 EASTSHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE 6033 CRIMSON CT MCLEAN VA 22101 - 1818 • i K & P CLEARWATER ESTATE LLC 3105 W WATERS AVE STE 31 TAMPA FL 33614 - FRANGEDIS, JOAN THE FRANGEDIS, MICHAEL 437 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 -2508 K & P CLEARWATER ESTATE LLC 3105 W WATERS AVE STE 31 TAMPA FL 33614 - AMERICANA GULF MOTELS LTD PTR 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT T L S HOLDINGS INC 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - LOMINC 4100 N 28TH TERR HOLLYWOOD FL 33020 - 1116 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE M & J TRUST PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 GIADLA, WERONIKA GIADLA, ALOJZY 355 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT T L S HOLDINGS INC 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - C B C I DEV GROUP LLC 475 CENTRAL AVE STE M8 ST PETERSBURG FL 33701 - CLEARWATER SEASHELL RESORT 28059 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - MALKE, ROBERT E MALKE, TERESA L PO BOX 2124 LARGO FL 33779 - 2124 SUNNY MOTEL LTD PTNSHP STE 100 N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR WAUKESHA WI 53188 - CLEARWATER SEASHELL RESORT 28059 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - BOLDOG,CLARA BOLDOG,DOROTHY 2500 VIRGINIA AVE NW UNIT 1405 WASHINGTON DC 20037 - 1901 BOLDOG,DOROTHY PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 CANTERBURY OAKS INC 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 SOFRONAS, JAMES SOFRONAS, CHRISTINE 431 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 DIVACO INC 455 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 GIBSON, EMMETT GIBSON, EVELYN L 2309 BRISTOL ST BRYAN TX 77802 - CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT T L S HOLDINGS INC 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SEA CAPTAIN 526 BELLE ISLE BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3612 SEA CAPTAIN CLEARWATER, CITY OF CLEARWATER, CITY OF 1433 COURT ST PO BOX 4748 PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 • CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 BRZEZNY, KRYSTYNA 1543 SANDY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - RUDMAN, MIRKO RUDMAN, ANKA 217 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST 163 BAYWAY DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ROGERS, ROLAND 321 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SZLECHTA, WLODZIMIERZ KUNOWSKA, EWA 333 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 WILK, THOMAS J WILK, STASIA 451 HARBOR DR S INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 3118 SEACOVE PTNSHP 316 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 TAS, JERRY TAS,TERESA 342 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 MAR, A P CORP 101 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2429 NIEMYJSKI, TADEUSZ NIEMYJSKI, MARGARET 35 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2437 SUNRISE ON THE BEACH INC 229 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 SEACOVEPTNSHP 316 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 KALLAS, DORA KALLAS, GEORGE 3405 GULF BLVD BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3644 TAS, JERRY TAS, TERESA 342 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 WILK, THOMAS J WILK, STASIA 451 HARBOR DR S INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 3118 SHAH, JUGALKISHOR B SHAH, MANNA J 326 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 US-EURO-TRADE INC 346 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 TRACEY, CHRISTINA M 207 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 MAZUR, JAN MAZUR, JANINA 216 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2446 CHRISTMAN, KENNETH R SR CHRISTMAN, LINDA J 225 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 GIOVANNI, ROBERT KOZIK, CHRISTIAN 852 NARCISSUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1131 R T V PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 3835 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8835 SOFRONAS, JAMES 431 GULF VIEW BLVD S CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CZAICKI, EDWARD CZAICKI, BOZENA 332 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATR BEACH FL 33767 - 2448 WILK, THOMAS J WILK, STASIA 451 HARBOR DR S INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 -3118 CLYMER, LOIS J A M P BELLINO INC J Z M C CORP 401 CORONADO DR 12016 WADSWORTH DR 415 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 TAMPA FL 33626 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 TIDSWELL INC 419 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 ZIMMERMANN, GUNDER 12912 CASTLEMAINE DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 4470 DI VELLO LAND TRUST DI VELLO, FULVIO THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - JAY KEYES CLEARWATER BEACH ASSOC. 100 DEVON DR. CLEARWATER, FL 11767 KENIG, EDWARD KENIG, STANISLAWA 433 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 D'AMICO, LOUIS J 410 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 DECADE GULFCOAST HOTEL PTNRS J K GULFVIEW N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR # 100 CONTINENTAL TOWERS 675 S. GULFVIEW BLVD #1002 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 FLD2005-01005 430 Gulfview Wayne Wells 0 ZIMMERMANN, GUNDER 12912 CASTLEMAINE DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 4470 BAY LAWN 406 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. ESQ JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP P.O. BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FL DOUG WILLIAMS, CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS 2544 FRISCO DRIVI CLEARWATER, FL 04!19/2005 _10_44 7274424 NORTH SUNRISE WRT PAGE 01 ?(L-) LUUV I ?? ?:? tie 1 3 ?:?U7 From the Des # *unW Iedaw191 ORIGINAL Via F191 (727) 562-4869 April 19, 2005 City of Clearwater, plmiog Department p,D.)M,x 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33759-4748 P.E. Adman's Mark MSPA Acquisition 11, LF, 430 South Gurfriew Blvd- FLD 2005-010051SON2005-01016 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: I object to having the Adam' s Mark being granted its request for terraituation of non-conformity because I believe that the zeal pu*Ose for this request is to ultimately turn the property into a large CONDOM M project, On the surface, this request sees to indicate that the owner wishes to keep that property ns a 217 roam hotel. However, once tbay am granted the termination of non-conformity, they will be We to come back to t1t CDB and request that their 217 "C0NF0RMffY" hotel units be converted to 162 condominium units! It is common knowledge on the beach that the property is under contract to a condominium developer who has receatly dernolished other hotels for hip! end condominiums. If the CDB decided anyway to grant the termination of non-conformity request, they should do so only with the stipulation that if the property is ever converted to residential condominiums td h ter condominiums be no greater that what would be allowed today (i.e,, 74 currently permitted units, equals 55 condominium units) Thank you for your consideration. $incemly r3 edq 'st 04/19/2005 10:44 72744240 NORTH SUNRISE #WRT PAGE 02 NNORT» 15UNME RISORT 669 MA"AiC«A,Y CLEARWr1,TER 8FACR, '6LORTAA ORIGINAL Via Facsimile (727) 562-4665 April 19, 2005 City of Clearwater, Planning Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 RE. Adman's Mark MSP,A Acquisition II, LP, 430 South Gulfview Blvd. FLD 2005-01045/$GN2005.01016 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: i hereby register my objection to the approval of the termination of non conformity for the property listed above. If the CBD grants this request, the owner of the propmy will be free to sell it to a condominium developer that will removal ALL of the Adam's Mark hotel rooms from the market and replace them with condominiums. If the termination of nonconformity is granted it should only be done so with the stipulation that the hotel rooms must be kept on the beach. If the owner or future owners want to convert the property to residential condominiums, they should not be gated a density of grmater than exist today (74 hotel rooms equals 55 condominiums). 04/06/2005 14:04 April 6, 2005 7274426628 0 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater, Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Transmit via Fsx ? 562-4865 Dear Mr. Wells: 440 WEST MGMT 0 We have received your notice of the Community Development Board public hearings for the property at 430 South Gul.fview Blvd. (formally the Adams Mark Hotel) on April 19, 2005. We have been neighbors with the hotel for. many years and have developed a good relationship with. them during this time. We have assisted and cooperated with each other on many occasions during special projects. We are providin this letter 10 offer our support for their requested variances. It is important for the city to retain good hotels when possible, to maintain a healthy balance of hotel rooms and condos on our beautiful. beach. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, 440 WEST, I e. ed te, President FTW/ens cc: File PAGE 01 440 S. GULFVIEVV JBI,VU., SUITE 203 CLEARVVATER BEACH, FLORIDA, 33767 (727) 461- 2885 442- 1480 FAX: 442- 6628 AN EDITION Of THE S *vItterlburg artmeg. R W11"AlERT1..AV.1E THURSDAY ¦ NOVEMBER I I, 2004 Shuttered hotel reborn ¦ The Adam's Mark hotel will reopen as the Radisson Hotel Clearwater Beach next year after hurricane repairs and other improvements are completed. By AARON SHAROCKMAN Times Staff Writer CLEARWATER BEACH - The 217-room Adam's Mark will reopen next year as a Radisson resort, officials with the hotel chain have confirmed. The new Radisson Hotel Clearwater Beach will open in June or July 2005, said Joan Cronson, a spokeswoman with the resort company. The 13-story hotel has been closed since Oct. 3 because of hurricane-related dam- age. The hotel also will - undergo a significant renovation, Cronson said this week. "They won't put the Radisson name on it until they reopen," she said. The Radisson Web site, www.radis- son.com, already lists the S GuNew Boule- vard property as the Radisson Hotel Clearwa- ter Beach. But receptionists answering calls from the hotel's local phone number Wednes- day still referred to the hotel as an Adam's Mark, And on the Adam's Mark Web site, www.adamsmark.com, the property was still listed as Adam's Mark, though prospective guests cannot book a room there. Late last year, a Boston hotel company and a real estate investment fund affiliated with Morgan Stanley bought the property for $20.1-million. Pyramid Advisory Group said at the time that it planned to remodel the three- star property and change its affiliation. In August, Pyramid announced the Clear- water Beach resort would undergo $6-million in renovations and be rebranded as a Radis- son. The renovations were to include the addition of a new restaurant. In October, the Adam's Mark was shut- tered by hotel administrators because of dam- age from the summer's hurricanes. Spokes- man Jerry Daly said it would be too difficult to recondition the 1970s-era hotel and keep it open for guests at the same time. Daly also said at the time that the resort planned to remain an Adam's Mark when it reopened. . . Daly said this week the ownership group has signed a contract with Radisson to operate the hotel. He said the two sides were still working on details, including. the scope of the renovations. Radisson has been without a presence on Clearwater Beach since the Radisson Suites on Sand Key closed earlier this year and reopened as the Marriott Suites Clearwater Beach. The worldwide hotel chain has 435 hotels in 61 countries, including Radissons on U.S. 19 north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and on Roosevelt Boulevard in the Gateway area of St. Petersburg. MSPA ACQ II Pyramid Clearwater Hotel 004052 Date Invoice No. Invoice Date Description Invoice Amount 1/24/2005 01.242005A 1/24/2005 1,205.00 G I N A L RECEIVED JAN 31 2005 D PtANNIN ?pRW ATER ? j CITY OF w 3CD Check [Date 1/24/2005 _ Check Number 004052 Total 1,205.00 0 REORDER FORM TP1 M BIRMINGHAM, AL 35216 (800) 366-3194 452892 I r Ir ti.. `Par.rs ??? A CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ¢?os jQj6?yMUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE,.CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW April 25, 2005 Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Johnson: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217- room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units are permitted today) and for height to allow the existing 155-foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use with a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to patio/pool decking and tiki bars) and to allow patio/pool decking seaward (westward) of the Coastal Construction Control Line, an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; (3) Reduction to the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval, under the provisions of Section 3-1807 (SGN2005-01016). The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applications with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density and building height per Section 6-109; 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 4. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; 5. Staff proposed signage complies with the Comprehensive Sign Program standards, under the provisions of Section 3-1807; and 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development, and will assist in retaining the community character of the immediate vicinity. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYC HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONFR FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BILI. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVI? ACTION EMPLOYER" April 25, 2005 Johnson - Page Two Conditions of Approval: 1. That any voluntary demolition of this existing building shall not vest the existing height of 155 feet. Any future reconstruction requires compliance with current Code height requirements; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 3. That the sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 4. That all City approvals and easements necessary for the sidewalk connection for handicap accessibility to the sidewalk on City property to the north be obtained prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion; 5. That prior to the issuance of any permits, site and building plans be revised to show the removal of, and the striping out of, the two southern parking spaces on the west side of the porte cochere as a "no parking" area, acceptable to the Engineering Department; 6. That fencing within the visibility triangles and waterfront visibility triangles be brought into compliance with Code provisions prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. Fence height increases above that otherwise permitted and alternate fence materials shall only be allowed (1) in the waterfront visibility triangle if a letter of "no objection" is submitted from the adjacent condominium association board and (2) in the visibility triangle if acceptable to the Engineering Department; 7. That the City, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion, approve the sidewalk cafe on the west side; 8. That the monument-style freestanding sign not exceed six feet in height, meet a five-foot setback from property lines and include the site address; 9. That all construction comply with FEMA requirements; and 10. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. You are also requested, since the property is more than one platted lot, to record a Declaration of Unity of Title in the public records of Pinellas County within 30 days of the date of this letter. The attached Declaration of Unity of Title document has been prepared for you for signature and recording. The new Declaration of Unity of Title document requires the owners' signature to be witnessed by two persons (whom also must sign the form) and be notarized prior to recording. Once the new Declaration of Unity of Title document is recorded, please submit a copy of the recorded document to Wayne Wells for our records. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (April 19, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order -does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. April 25, 2005 Johnson - Page Three Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 3, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.conVgov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, chael , Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0430 Adams Mark+Radisson (7) - ApprovedlGulfview S 0430 Development Order.doc