The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-07080 _° Clearwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 8-30- 05 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 04-05-05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER: 717- 4/-/7- 963 7 FAX NUMBER: 1oZ 7 4/L/ 9 971037 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Ak,n / fU') l (Must include ALL owners as listed the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: a2u Sh D?P P / A10Z M 6)W,,P pia Oinlr/ in U <?rJ? ccS S c .1 L/ MAILING ADDRESS: X001 ClP?f 100d/ V '7 ????. f .Y r1' t-/ 33 7!5--5- PHONE NUMBER: 702 7 - J4'1-,5 - a $10 9 FAX NUMBER: 70, CELL NUMBER: -7a-7 - gi'2)5 - :6- ']J E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site:__ ??O (c?? ?- I I Cwt ?? 'f LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I..? ( .1=JGU--? ',LIB ?> IJ? , (per Un; {-- (if not fi ted her ,plea a notW77the locatio of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 7 r'1•, 01 ?? S? b?05u f OQ)4? O? 1(o O PARCEL SIZE: ` / oti D :Z-)jb. Fl- (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required U r"j f parks a s, pcfise, efc.)' } ? p _ _ I 0 a DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO 1V_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ? Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: q Fs. ?. ? + ? ' . O G E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ?d// At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the C manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) V/SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; C/ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G/SITE SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): r' +; All dimensions; Q --- - , , North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; i t Location map; SEP 0 9 2005 Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;_ -? TI Footprint and size of all EXISNG buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; Ca I1( OF CLt.i:: ii+. ! d All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including al! paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and i Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) and color rendering if possible; Q FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) G7 LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development,Board); Irrigation notes. (rREDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/Z X 11) (color rendering if possible); I IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); J EP U 9 2005 I COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive ?Ij' Land cape Program .sl,jall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code.will not be•met. I: BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. X11 4 BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; EDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Pro ide phptographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or *to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Reduced signage proposal (8'/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. 4?-v Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. i:l I If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration EndineenngLDepartment at (727) 56: I U ),r"- - _21 a t SEP Q 9- 2CO5 I. i u/1 L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this applica if are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authori a pity representatives to visit and photograph the property descri edjin this application. day of A.D. 200.5 to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as property owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ,° k Sworn to and subscribed before me this A=). , day of 14 07/21/2005 16:11 7274468036 NORTHSIDE ENG SVCS PAGE 02/03 CITY OF CLEARWATER ® R-1 G I N A L is AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100-SOUTH-MYRTLE AVENUE, 2n1 FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562.4576 (Name of all property owners) t. That (I arnAve are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (Nature of request) 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint 4Aa4W"A?, Zmk aye (htaAhelr) epsnt(a) ro mte OnY petBlona or other doWment6 rreceseery f eReCt each peupon; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; S. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that t for oin i true.SFib conect. property Owner Property owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS B fore me the Undersigned, an officer duly com a 0n d by the I oft State of Florida, on thle personally appeared day of depos and says that heJshe fully understands the co the a t h hem sbnetl ° having been first duty sworn My Cbmmiselon Explh ::??r - otary public S. OPPllcaltoh formsld°velopment rovlew/ArRdevit to Authorize Agent RONALD ,;?4e'r "''••, RONALD M- qDG E *:= MY COMMISSION N DD 409645 EXPIRES: July 16, 2009 1ffi' Bonded Thru Notary Pugyq i?.. SUS 292005 (Address or General Locetton) i REGATTA BAY • • ¦¦ XT I .a 0 71, wt? lei I MK REGATTA BAY 44 low no me No an an an 1 1 In ??. ONO 0 0 r1 U 30 Carriage House SFangle Georgian Brick L-__ W41.L S - STiJ aeo ID4L t Wlmf>HA. W14rt?f A ceWrS 07/28/2005 08: 11 PM s Page 1 of 2 'fit 2297 - - CERTAIIJTE60 ROOF G?,eG?/ RRi ek U) O O O Cf) 0 J Z a- En cn m CI,54,qW,A MR 20' 2 • n ??- 24' ' 1 CO O ts LNLpNC 7 ' N 1 0 e 758 ?_ _ 6 N i ?l C - 1 i 't 11 II G II 1 o, I o I 00 or 5TH 1 I 1 1 O IC 1 I O 1 1 0 II NC?,WALK C) a m $ M? 4 r 8 CC 1 19' t EGIGY?NG _ - ?'eu Ne O BQI? cr) ?y NEV I WµJ( EL C 1 1 I ? n fir, DRAMW E4SEVW g ? ? tirtrl?Ar 1 s r 1 }' I. t ikto I! F yBLVD ( o BA- YWA D PLMNING DEPARTME NT S?ry,,fol'r CIWOF C R iATER 0 ? ?, oRo?_ -ZVI 07/21/2005 16:11 7274468Fis NORTHSIDE ENG SVC? LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION PAGE 03/03 This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with Northside Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for PA `&4 f and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at lying within County, State of tazi2? . Signature cif Property Owner Address of Property Owner f Print Name of Propefrty dwner Telephone Number City/State/Zip Code State of, County of r•, The foregoing Instrurne was acknowledge before me this o , 9:1_, by as who is perso ally known to me r who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. RONALD M. AUGUSTINE MY COMMISSION # DD 409645 EXPIRES: July 16, 2009 HondedrnmNo"Pubacunderw ters Notary Public (Signature) Commission # It 5 S (SEAL ABOVE) ' Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) N1'.E" PT1 SEP 0 S 7005 .?.,. ?..i I t i)i' CA • • Exhibit A to Flexible Development Application CEP 0 8 288'5 862 Bayway Boulevard - Regatta Bay NES Project #0536 Description of Request: Flexible Development approval to construct a five (5) unit, five story residential structure with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 9 feet (to building column) and from 15 feet to 0 feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4 feet (to sidewalk pavement.) A reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 7.58 feet (to building) and 7 feet (to columns.) Also, reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and 20 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 71 feet (to roof deck) and 82'9" to top of cupola roof and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-8033 General Applicable Standards (Section 3-913.A): 1. The subject property is located within the Clearwater Pass district and is currently developed with a two story, four unit attached dwelling. The surrounding properties are developed with three story (or higher) attached dwellings and provide no real character or architectural distinction. The properties to the east of the site are designated High Density Residential. The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards and provides a proposal that is more consistent in scale, bulk, density and coverage with the surrounding properties. The proposal will provide for positive redevelopment with improved site design, building and function. The proposed nautical theme to the building will be in line with the desires of Beach by Design program and the development as a whole will provide needed upgrades to the site. The submitted arial photograph of the subject site with surrounding buildings collaborates the development as proposed, will be compatible with the scale and bulk of the adjacent properties. 2. The proposed development of a five unit attached dwelling is an allowable use within the Tourist District of the Community Development Code. The character and intensity of the proposed development will be in compliance with the zoning classification and compatible with the surrounding uses of higher density residential development, therefore, the proposal supports the appropriate development desired for the adjoining properties. Additionally, the significant investment proposed for the site will increase the value of the subject property and the surrounding land. Negative effects on the surrounding sites are not anticipated as the proposed use is minimal compared to the density of the surrounding uses and properties. SEP 0 9 2005 1 ? . _. t 0 0 3. The proposed residential use will- create less of an adverse impact than the more intense surrounding uses as the site will be occupied by five long term residents (homeowners) as opposed to transient tenants. A retention area will be created at the rear to eliminate runoff onto adjacent properties. 4. The scale of the proposed- use takes into consideration the over burdened traffic flow of the community and will not add additional stresses upon the scale and flow of vehicular or pedestrian movement. The vehicle trip generation for this development will not have any significant or negative impact on intersections or roadways within the community. Additionally, the proposal provides new and improved parking which will no longer require the users to back out into the right way which will greatly improve the existing situation. S. The proposed design is in keeping with the community character as the design provides somewhat of a nautical theme and provides well articulated and unified elevations. Additionally, the site design offers well designed landscaping improvements. 6. The proposed development through design, materials and function, minimizes adverse effects on the adjacent properties by providing appropriate greens space, landscaping, mass and scale. Additionally, the proposed five unit residential use by basic nature is minimal in intensity. Flexibility Criteria (Section 2-803 (B)) Attached dwellings 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development Response: The built environment to the east and south in addition to the proposed and existing developments to the west are of similar scale or larger than the proposed 5 unit development. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street Response: The proposed access to the site does not involve direct access to an arterial street. 3. Height: I o n r 2%U5 j a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance, ; rye Response: The additional height requested is within the acceptable limits of the flexible development standards for the Tourist District and will provide for better articulation of the 2 0 0 architectural design of the proposed building. Additionally, architectural roof features have been added to the design to provide relief to the side elevation. b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building Response: The proposed design provides the parking within the footprint of the building as desired by the Beach by Design program. 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life Response: Although a front setback back reduction is being requested in order to design within a 60' wide lot, many of the improvements included within this proposal will provide a more pedestrian friendly environment such as: providing for parking within the building envelope, reducing the curb cut by 50% and installation of new quality landscaping along the street. b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance Response: The proposed building design associated with this application reflects that of a nautical theme and will most certainly add to the desired character of the beach community. Additionally, the design of the proposed development complies with the Beach by Design guidelines by providing on site parking within the building envelope. Further, the architectural design of the building in concert with the proposed landscape improvements reflect the desires of the Beach by Design program. The proposed design of the site takes into consideration the need for setbacks and establishment of yards in addition to the lack of lot width available on this site. c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles Response: The proposed design will meet or exceed the Fire code requirements. d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance Response: The proposed development provides a building of minimal width driven by the minimum standards of a parking plan layout. A minimal 24' driveway is provided with the minimal required dimensional spacing for each parking space. The proposed design of the site takes into consideration the need for setbacks and establishment of yards in addition to the lack of lot width available on this site. The development provides a building design and materials with interest and appeal as well as establishing green spaces with well landscaped yards. 5. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes 3 SEP 0 5 2005 pl. NNi •r a + ?i 4. :Jr ?? J?JCJ ca1? c?F N f hriwk,,UJj 6 0 or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation Response: No parking deviation requested. b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level Response: The proposed site design provides parking contained within the footprint of the building and the south facades of the building will be finished with many architectural features and changes. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 Response: The development planned for this site offers a new building with architectural interest and an improved site design both elements reflect the desires of the Beach by Design program. Enhancements to the pedestrian pathway, providing for parking within the building envelope in addition to a decrease of the apron required for the driveway and installation of plantings in the front yard area will provide visual attractiveness in addition to providing needed improvements to the area. Revised 8131/05 my TE IRI r?US2C5 07/28/2005 15:22 172745:. OFFICAL RECORDS. PAGE 02/03 5R? Lei iiviY2 , 7Pt1 ? pXhELLAS' ?v?141NTY" F ?• A'. e^ ....' ..M11°?dl.. ?+ e•,; QFF' ?REG,.AK• ,Do ,• l.?a '?` b?' ' G. Ito S L' LOW4?' ?t Harrp n 14 ,. s 4ITd 'I'? 'htss fe • -- - ' r f:?xa't ark .ancT PC) t ?,•. fi. a addrbe :gI14 " f?L s x040, to; RQ?RRT - G.-401' bTC?N and L . $' Harbctx' Cixc le S. ' Lax'go- :' O the 'H 'A?tI'LTQN 'FAKIiaY TRUST LMllS100'HK lLT-q?1rt -? ': ''l?YU t s'r 9' i' w "'9X4'9 Rotboi • Circi?e' * i. p . x'^27- hbsa'.abt a£f fCe' ddrea#' ,.je •;iUN .csss&[ ' .464q,' . i?ecrar: paxp ,, '?h ?t-;the said.,'-first, pa? j? i - ?azi?3der???.azt??do?s'fi?re .r?nff$e• ' y' fct good •;a»d,vt?Xtie?le,., .., • ' i $aid,•s'G?d part d bY,. ?''el,eae mild guff-c1?in.•u,llto-:th -? .f?rerr..'a:3 gilts''ft y e ti 'ai1d. di?h and Which-the ''s,a'fd :fizort drty'ght} 1e iat?? \.. • descri -,•,.,. ha g'ln and"to t =' ? bed iat'f- piece';•or,:pa=e2. .',Of.- $ ?n.'t}xe:'dvu?t -x?f' .and N., sitiu??t ?Y#q- and; bQ 'SEA t3 . THE' SxDE'QR' ?,LGi bL5C1I? ??QN• ::w,k:i* ! SN WI'l'Ws ' : iE690 ,'', ROP6T H7#?i LTf)1?, .,.,a , . • ' ' r sign6d andeeajed, thee' "yea 'ts tui ''?i AUYS$,: H IT, Qp 'h8?i ,16 v?rxri. . . • • 'del Y „ . n tQ'. clay, ..ant Xe.: 7' 4 s iri' tote • , i ??: ? ,tip. t , . i .? ? . ' '?. • ?$ y/y?,? _ ?T•,? '*?T • ?•?., '4 , [•F•, ' ..ter HARI _ ??. t5t.. "?•" 1'. ? ? ,`ro:. ~j t 4' iJ Vw•?{?f ia"r4,' ? •./I' " 1 ?'? Flc?racla *?; •' r •°' !rpi 3,464 C?$ Of tJj^?: ] tl8ilII1$Tit Cl?rnyw,kedir 2,e IDe , L ,~ R ..x:Tora; " UlSr ire' pex?iia31 known to, me .. ' `d vsr it terse gs 1,darit Y M . ors Sib hav ct7xa :`r?" i ficatiic?z : at?'d who da.d' ake Oath, lj; ?C" ? "'>,r75 . r • .. • . ?'1 .?* ' i??l' • • TUB ?? r ••',r?LLi .r,( -77 Bj. ,. .'-n'?:.-,,uf?. •,?1 '?,,, ,? '? , `,•'•, - ?h .??, 5?? ? .fir ? ? • '? ,y ?? .. !1 -'. If •• ,;•1,•1? R1 Fl i.-'E N: 1''r rlf-'-• Ff L?kER?l., ?. .F11`" '-..?.,? \, .I - - •} - Rp E 4.1 F.' 1, b BY'. • 07/28/2005 15:22 172745 OFFICAL RECORDS. PAGE 03/03 Are , *BA Sec?UN.Tk' Fly' ; °: • `. .'`., w a `'.. y- ,•+- ,r •. •1 11•A ' • M"?•^, ? ' Y ref n .? 16 11AYSTIZ 14;6t :16 " theiisoi. t - raC?r +ed xt ii)At carding el?es.Gpl?rit?r F14i'da' Pgels. Y ,•20'a• A?tQS?rt?i. o ,?. '(,,. .C't - ?.? ? '' - 'r? ?'' •0.-,1 •?:\. • ? 'fir •. '. b ', .'. pl j TEA',: r'. .• , ?•?• ??y* „ '•-- r - '.h;, •- : , ?. N*,?± .• 1•?•J ,a•?-•?? -'l 'y • •? ??,?.) 7 ,+• M+m Yell ? r sw•''•n' ~'.+?l+a ?•,. N. r;, "?'%`r.+n. ,.. ?'._'?'.-1„rery t.,irjf,?: r; ?, _-"+ ... ?•Q L7 - •. ,'d ? ? -' -':?•.:? ;???.????? i..•....r.'t.d..lr"?-?+:r:aa:..!?rt?.?.-,i?`t'- "; •: a' 'r•„' , . n \ .. '? t, ,.,wog" .. - ,' .. ? = ? - - •Y ? •'--„ ?. _ ?,r?•, ?h :, • 1,• _ • • . ,'fie .. A\' ,.7f. ' ,N V _ r • '. :z??'I ? • , ? ',I1 1 '' ?- ??---. ?- -' ???.••'?' ? _ •. r'. . -\ w? ,t- , ?.? rye . •'•?. _ .. - • .. ,• . z ? '+• ? ? ., . _ Men -?•? ? . . ' , • w . • ' •'+a - • 690-/1793 E A S E M E N T o,a. 3131'P FOR AND IN CONSIDTION of the sum, of One Dollar ($1.00) cash 1nlhande bthpallenefi to it, the reoeiPt of which Is hereby acknowl,edgedy arits to be derl.ved therefrom, FIELD HOTiM C8PPORATION, 4 Florida corporation, does hereby grant and cQ-:ftV0y to the CITY Off' CLpBWATER, PLORIDA, an easement over, under ar4 aorose the following described ].and, lying and being situate in the County of 131nellas, state or Plori(ja, to wit: w8e:ain at the Northeast corncr Of $aygide Subdivision No. 6, Unit c as rc o d , c r ed in Flat Hook 55, pxsca 19 aid 20 of the p bli u c Rocorag *f Pine llas County, Florida and run thence S SD55 it) I "* E w 00 F, , 120, 0 feet along Easterly lino Of said Subdivision; thence,N a10041S9" Z% ° 10 0 feet; th N S55101" ;P , enc W, 120, 0 feet; thence S 81004159f, W, 10, 0 feet to P 0 B e ? F4,i G . . . P U Q ? , a u: 45 w s o mPM f F drainage This easement being for 2b cQ" in,stall.atlon and maintenance. The CITY OF CLEAAWATE2, FLORIDA, maize the above shall have the right to enter thee deany ; d ..premj$es and to construct, lu$tall and maiatah thereon any 21nes and to inspect and alter such drainage lines frota time to time. "IN WITNESS W13'F,EEOP, the party hereto has caused these presents to be duly eXeouted by Its Proper offi0ors thereunto authorized and its seal, to be hereunto affixed, this 2Sth l gw,. day oP_ r'?) 'L Sighed, Oealed and delivered in the proseneA\of, r, .? (corporate Beal) SEP Q S 2CO5 i PLAN,: . - _ . ?o -,-- rxFSxaan? qq Attests ,?c? T s Aset, Ay F iF V ' OCUMENTARY K j G ?uezQ ? ti Se/Z9 3SVd CZM>4nn-:I?., ?Nnr , „ I r STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Pinallau Sef=0 me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared lvtartin W. b'icld and Lawrence S. XrFavct me we ..•. XXV),11111 o mg tv - -.., nd, , and who executed. the foregoing instrument as s- e$or••a nt. and Acme. Secretary respeotivelyo of 8 orporatior' e n e? or$gc ng instruments and they severally aolcnowledged to and before me that they executed said instrument on behalf of and'In the norae of said corporation as suoh offiaers; that the seal arfIxed to paid instrument is the ooxporate seal of said corporation and that it was affixed thereto by due and regular corporate authority; that they are duly authorized by said oorporation to exenute said Instrument and that said instrument is the free apt and dead of maid corporation. IN WXTSESE WHMEOV I have hammto set my hand and affixed my orfjoial seal this 28th day of J'uiv A.D. 19 b[y COZZI-ssion Expixesa Notary Pow 5laly w Florlaq at taro. My Gul"J"14 11 EMDUOq Fya• tl, 1075 SO/E9 39Vd n1inn?. . .- pY,i^ atr.` (rti.'Y7,. -:•;v':a ..... .. -- ..._.. .. ?r,?e. - ,:.r.•:r'v,:'c :-r,?ne•?.4...,F9if. te, :?'?? ' i fir r - lr ,. ,-- E'A6EMEN"T' FOR AND IN CCUSMBI`ATIoN of the sum of One pollar (5.1. 001 cash in hand paid to it, the receipt of wh'Tch is hereby. a91c110wledged, and the " benefits to be derived therefro:.,, l''1LLI) I'.(OTEL CORPORATION, a k'lorida corporation, .-.. do?'h by grant and convoy to. the CITY OF CS_.E.ARWAT,ER, FLCIRZI?A, an"easernert over, under and acrose'the following described land, lyinb and being eiWa,te in tllo County of Pinellae, State Ckt Florida, to wit: k'rcrxz tho Northraaat corner of 19syside Subdivision, N.7, © unit•C, as recorded in Flat 73a01c 55,, papas, lg and 20, Of - the Public Recordp of Pinellu's COMAty, Florida, run '8100415911 E, 10, 0 feat tor, the P. O. B..; thence continue N-8ilw59" x, b. Wfeet; thence roil $ 8°55=01" E to tbe' ?!!J' W ' --M North right of way line of B4yway Boulcva.rd as xecor,ded in pq, the Public aeeor?4a of Pinellas County, Florida, (O.R. 3131, 1" page 369); thence run on a curve to the left along said North right of wdy H40 of Bayw4y Boulevard, 6 feet M. O. L. ; thr*nee rust N 8,5510111 W, Il0 feet M. 0. L. to the P. 0. B, This easement being for utilities installation and =ajntcn:anec. The CITY OF CLEARWATEIZ, F,LORMA, ehall have the right to ent;or ?.e upon the above deacribed prCmxses and to construct, i;,Stall and Maintain thereon;' any utility lines and to suspect and alto r such utility lines from, ti=0 to time. IN'WITNESS '4 HEJ?,EoF, the party hezeto has mused theuc presents to be duly executed by its proper office;,, tbereu$to aut•:ioxl d seal so be haXeuu%to affixed., this 5l1 day of Nar:.. 9 7 Z 4 Ln i N rr r? v W c; ? 0 ?11 0 Irv±'r I. ?Jn vAy ?iC.L Vi' "?IIJiJasq ' • ' ;k EBtare 406 .,tho uradersign'ad a'uthoYity? this day gar o ";,'`e, . __ 1 •S ria?l'y. a'g?es'x.?'?cT,: ti a]1 nod a ;)A9 b ba t1Y8?'?i ztd d13?`?6 : ;d" , e.4 x? ' + '"axecu'ted., the foie'goi?tg' xument as .• .r `; , 1?rai dtxlt ) '4 : ' c• Sey?etary respecLigel y9 •OT b C;bZ%" l G ion , 18autl' : 3Y •or0' o"'?g ina5 ?rument ". frond they ?eve2 a? ly'=Fi c3ziii 1yY' e1j .red i ' •: acid p? Qxe me tY?t .they exogin?ed. 541d InEtiutnc?'nt on k,C?la r`,;az t?ic3''xi?trnb.of said corporat1oz as such offi(-.Grs; 'that.,.tii sea'1'•? .:.'i f3o r' aid 375stre?teovit is the oarpoxatc 'Beal of ,s.E??. Coxpvt?Ati{?zi•: r d9 y?o:t'' ' ,'-t-was ai tixed. thereto by'clue and. reaalar oorp4ro to ' a r-' ,?" t1x?-dxL? Sr !1]C? 11t?1oS ?iy•'',• fiillfc '`''. a - ?• ':±sz"-v'?'???a?t;,. t at}' that. gai.c1 Snatr-ent is t?e.fre6 aoG?'.i t was deed of 'ra'id. cQx?iSx?IFik"? ,?1b • t'} 114 W'ITNE'SS WTIEREOF,. I h&vV haraunto-oo-t my hand and a;M,-:reed x2y bfftoial seal this " .-PP day of Aobu il'9 22 "',' ig. ? ? 'i'on E ?ktsla6 ? Vl??i'?`.w:'-??•??•? ??,?,,,,.:::,,,, Tl ?1?7w ''vL. 1' i,Y• V%i'h.rk?P?M !'' l• '. ?p®ry'iwoNf.?iixP,? ?, )?' ,. f.e,,71,;,...;,?r'?"!?.w' 14` tr, • ? . '?;.. i;`?i>i?iK?PM?'ithr? '.+,1'•'? °n•,: ;j, nw,,'a ?:"`.'Fr"4, , •o,,li, _ , • _• - ^• _ , ^'.p[. •+n±'!grb ' i 1;7E .J? .? $? ,?kf ' a. r c ??.'j •,•R tliF f?a '? ^,`i?l Jt' °YCl'f'zP+rw', • i. _„ s.^ - 5Z bNir ,i7 0 ?? ' ???rM. ??i1?•"rir5^'. YM1r?F.?.?s j)".i • .. _ g ? .' ,.'t - s :A ,: a?mii ;?pV?f'?? 1'??-. ;;,? , t Y..'+y; lh:>r..: c , . ?i ^?'i•=. .'icy. '... I `Lli,t??1 `J4?b.° rv ?. ?:.ti''.? Yll,:..•'?i'i?''t.i"? .. .`y, `+i.,?l.: r: ..i ;.:'....`i; :Yyr:'!'•'?;,'' ''I ?p? ._d. 5"1 of ':! ? ''c?,ry;.,,;:.:.t) ^''):. :i,17.::'• .•fc:, tM.' ?q ` ?' a?` °.? elu .a?: :pr:,?.:•."•6 ?.' "y,?:,a7;"ir?e;lx??+ i??9,ly ,? r. 1 G1??A?A?A;,n?-:?n..r.???rvi,,.n .,,?r .,....., _,. .._......>,.,•?,._..:.,r.. ,;:1: ?:k:".??ft:Y ?'•'i?.• ...,.,....._.?..Y'G?,rz,?_1.?...?k?,t,??rA?l? .. O 1 Horthside • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • STORMWATER REPORT FOR: RE GA TTA BA Y PROJECT i?tt4t tftfgfd i ,, 4v ? • `; f 9 Ram A. Goel, PIi:D.L.'P.9 #44`43f : == ? s r? - ;•?-..a p i , ..... - 1'1 +fflttbt4tt? .-.r - September, 2005 6 LL; Project No. 0536 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM ORIGINAL 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 0 9 DRAINAGE NARRATIVE FOR REGATTA BAY The proposed construction activities consist of the following: • Removal of 4,420 S.F. of existing impervious area. • Construction of 4,490 S.F. of impervious area • This results in a net increase of 70 S.F. of impervious area which is negligible. • Construction of a stormwater pond to provide quality treatment for Y2" of runoff over the entire site. Quantity attenuation is not required since discharge will be into open Florida waters. Offsite runoff along the east side of the property will be intercepted via a shallow swale and will discharge into Clearwater Harbor. • Construction of sanitary sewer and water service systems to serve the five story condominium. The project is located in an open basin. Construction of this project will not significantly increase the existing peak discharge rate or volume. There are no wetland impacts or construction in state owned submerged lands. All appropriate sedimentation/erosion control measure will be implemented during construction. Since no concentrated flows exist or are proposed, it is likely that containment of the project area with silt fencing is all that will be necessary. Drainage Calculations: Drainage Volume Required 7280 x'/z" x 1/12 = 303 CF Drainage Volume Provided = 348 CF ORIGINAL ` N ! Q, e 1 i:. • PROJECT NAME : PROJECT NO.: REGATTA BAY 0536 POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA : T.O.B. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= • STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 5.00 588 0.013 612 4.50 468 0.011 348 4.45 456 0.010 325 4.40 444 0.010 302 4.20 396 0.009 218 4.00 348 0.008 144 3.50 228 0.005 0 TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME _ PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = 7,280 SF 0.50 IN 303 CF 4.50 348 C F cli A, Lo G'7 ORIGINAL I. • NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS PROJECT: REGATTA BAY PROJECT NO.: 0536 VOLUME PROVIDED = 348 C.F. BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 4.50 BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 3.50 UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 3.00 COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) = 0.09 FT/MIN LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 10 FT SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 4 INCH • POND AREA (SF) = 468 S.F. POND AREA (SF) = 228 S.F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HYD. GRAD. FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT FT/FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 4.50 468 1.21 0.25 2.75 0.44 10 0.41 109 264 4.25 408 0.96 0.25 2.75 0.35 10 0.33 94 288 4.00 348 0.71 0.25 2.75 0.26 10 0.24 79 327 3.75 288 0.46 0.25 2.75 0.17 10 0.16 64 410 3.50 228 TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME _ TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME = 348 C. F. 21.5 HOURS ORIGINAL i zz.7- C-3 Lo L7. C. J 0 • FLD2005-07080 862 BAYWAY BLVD Date Received: 07/29/2005 REGATTA BAY ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 285B PLANNER OF RECORD: WW SEP 0 9 2005 CLWCoverSheet • ,sec' ORIGINAL FLD2005-0708 862 BAYWAY BLVD Date Received: 07/29/2005 REGATTA BAY r 0 JUL 2 9 2005 PLANN;tVC 8 Gt ?:- ; :. t Siff OF OF C!, ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 285B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Christy Butler [christyb@fisherarchitects.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 4:13 PM To: Lopez, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: BCP2008-04399 - Regatta Bay Mike -Thank you - we will have our plans and responses back into the bldg dept prior to or on 3-11-09. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Christy Butler Project Manager Fisher & Associates, LLC. 2315 Belleair Rd. Clearwater, Fl. 33764 Christi B(r fisherarchitects.com 727-443-4436 Fax (727) 531-6653 727-488-0986 cell This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. From: Michael.Lopez@myClearwater.com [mailto:Michael.Lopez@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 3:58 PM To: Christy Butler Cc: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: BCP2008-04399 - Regatta Bay You will have 30 days from the date of the five month letter. (02/11/09) To keep this application going past 03/11/09, 1 would need a request in writing to extend this application. When do you anticipate resubmitting this project for the building permit? Michael Lopez Development Review Specialist Plans Coordinator City of Clearwater, Building Department 727-562-4567 X 2569 michael.lor)ez(@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Christy Butler [mailto:christyb@fisherarchitects.com] 2/24/2009 Page 2 of 2 Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 12:17 PM To: Lopez, Michael Cc: Doreen Williams; Jeremy Georgopulos Subject: BCP2008-04399 - Regatta Bay Importance: High Mr. Lopez - I am in receipt of your letter dated February 11, 2009. We have just completed and were approved for an amended development order. Our approved dated letter was issued by Mr. Wells on 2-9-09, please see the attached. We have recently noticed that our "Gas" comments were in review as of 2-13-09. What is the allotted time to respond to building comments, once all of the comments are in? Is it 6 months from the time that the Gas division has completed their review? Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Christy Butler Project Manager Fisher & Associates, LLC. 2315 Belleair Rd. Clearwater, Fl. 33764 Christvsfis herarchitects.com 727-443-4436 Fax (727) 531-6653 727-488-0986 cell This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. 2/24/2009 R1 1p o J? rr.sw31' PLANNING DEPARTMENT William Joe Fisher, Jr., AIA Fisher and Associates, LLC 2315 Belleair Road Clearwater, FL 33764 Re: Development Order - Minor Revision FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Boulevard Dear Mr. Fisher: February 9, 2009 On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 12 conditions the above referenced case, which was for Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to nine feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and from 10 feet to eight feet (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 77 feet (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.B. A proposal has been submitted to revise the approved building and site plans for the following: Building Plans: 1. The revised plans correct ingress/egress and on-site circulation conflicts within the previously approved plans. The stairways have been properly calculated, providing the required ingress/egress to each unit per FHA and NFPA requirements. 2. The revised plans eliminate the two townhome units on the upper floors, which were not properly accessible per FHA and NFPA requirements, and replaced with "flat" units on each of the top two floors. Building Elevations: 1. The revised plans correct the opening area limitations requirements per the Florida Building Code 2004 (with 2006 and 2007 revisions), which was incorrectly calculated on the originally approved elevations. 2. The revised plans specify concrete barrel tile above 30 feet above grade, rather than roof shingles, with the required product approvals. 3. The revised plans redesign some roof elements that were not constructable. • • CITY OF C LEARWAT E R POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATm, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERvRCEs BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 February 9, 2009 Fisher - Page 2 In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed on plans submitted and date stamped July 23, 2008 (Sheets A2.2, A2.3, A4.2 and A4.3) and January 16, 2009 (Sheets C3.1, C4.1, A2.1 and A4.1) are deemed to be a Minor Revision and are APPROVED, subject to the following Minor Revision Conditions of Approval. When resubmitting revised site and building plans under Building Permit #BCP2008-04399, such plans will need to comply with these additional conditions: Minor Revision Conditions of Approval: 1. That all Conditions of Approval imposed originally by the Community Development Board on October 18, 2005, are still in effect and enforceable; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil site and landscape plans be revised accordingly to reflect the revised building design; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site and landscape plans be amended to screen parking from view along the west side by a minimum four-foot high solid landscaped fence or wall; 4. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site and landscape plans be amended to show vertical curbing along the northern pavement edge. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner Ill, at 727-5624504. Sincerely, Michel De k AI Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationslBayway 862 Regatta Bay (T) -Approved; VestedlBayway 862 Minor Revisions Development Order 2.9.09.doc Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 1:01 PM To: 'Christy Butler' Cc: Doreen Williams Subject: Minor Revision for FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd (Regatta Bay) Christy - Attached is a Minor Revision Development Order. The original is being mailed to you. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Christy Butler [mailto:christyb@fisherarchitects.com] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:49 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Doreen Williams Subject: Minor Revision for FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd (Regatta Bay) Wayne - Regarding the above, what is the status of the revised sheets addressing your comments for the above. We re-submitted the package 1/16/09. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Christy Butler Project Manager Fisher & Associates, LLC. 2315 Belleair Rd. Clearwater, Fl. 33764 ChristyB Cdifisherarchi tects.com. 727-443-4436 Fax (727) 531-6653 727-488-0986 cell This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. 2/9/2009 FISHER AND ASSOCIATES, LLC. 2315 Belleair Road Clearwater, FL. 33764 (727) 443-4436 (727) 531-6653 (fax) ® Hand Delivered ? Fed-Ex ? Other ? Regular Mail ? FTP UPLOAD City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-5624504 ATTENTION: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner DATE: I January 16, 2009 CASE NO: I FLD2005-07080 - Regatta Bay Condos I 2 1/15/09 Fisher and Associates, Inc., - Response letter and revised sheets to Minor Revisions comments. Revised Sheets Include: A2.1, Garage Plan A4.1, North and South Elevations C3.1, Staking Site Plan C4.1, Grading, Drainage and Utilities Site Plan row c Dom; ? JAM i , REMARKS: Mr. Wells - Please find enclosed a response letter and two sets of the revised sheets to go along with the responses regarding the above referenced project If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Christy Butler FILE: Christy Butler Project Manager COPY TO: THANK YOU • J FISflEflflNDflSSDCIfl1ES,INC. ORIGINAL I' ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS RECEIVED AN 16 cure PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 14, 2009 CITY OF CLEARWATER Mr. Wayne Wells, Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Response to Minor Revisions review comments Regatta Bay / Case No. FLD2005-07080 Dear Mr. Wells; Comment: The original site plan approved by the CDB reduced the east side setback to seven feet. The proposal reduces this east side setback to 6.5 feet. Section 4-406.A.4 for Minor Revisions prohibits any additional reduction to setbacks from that approved by the CDB. It is noted that, since the original approval of this project, the parking stall length has been revised from 19 to 18 feet. Response: The east set back is 7'. The building.footprint did not change from the originally approved plans. The dimensions had been incorrectly shown. Although code has changed regarding lengths of the parking stalls from 19' to 18', we will be retaining the 19' length due to the interior layout of the garage. Comment: The original site plan approved by the CDB reduced the north rear setback to 18 feet (to building) and to 15 feet (to pavement). The proposal reduces this north rear setback to 14.8 feet to pavement. It is unclear if the setback to building has been modified to be less than 18 feet. Section 4-406.A.4 for Minor Revisions prohibits any additional reduction to setbacks from that approved by the CDB. Response: The north, rear, setback to the building measures 18' and to pavement 15'. We are unsure where the typed dimensions came from, but the building.footprint has not moved since the previously approved plans. Comment. Fireplaces are indicated in each unit, but the elevations do not show any chimney above the roof. Are the fireplaces gas-fueled and vented internally? Response: Fireplaces are gas fueled and will be vented, flue and chimney will not be required. Comment. The north elevation does not indicate the bay window on the right-hand side, as properly indicated on the left-hand side of the south elevation. Response: Bay window has been revised on the North elevation to clearly indicate the glazing. Comment. Only civil Sheet C3.1 has been submitted showing how the building and sidewalks are situated on the site. No Sheet LIA (Landscape Plan) has been submitted and is not required per se at this time. With the building redesign, the southern stairwell has been shown to egress onto a sidewalk parallel with the southern property line connecting the driveway and the required egress sidewalk from the northern stairwell. This sidewalk parallel with the southern property line connecting the driveway and the required egress sidewalk from the northern stairwell reduces the landscape area available from that previously approved by the CDB. To create a larger planting area consistent with that approved by the CDB, run a AA 0001344 2315 BELLE41R ROAD • CLEARWATER, FL 33764 (727) 443-4436 • FAX (7279 531-6653 • www. fisherarchitects.com sidewalk straight out from the southern stairwell egress door to the sidewalk within the right- of-way and remove the sidewalk parallel with the southern property line connecting the driveway and the required egress sidewalk from the northern stairwell. Response: The sidewalk in the front of the building has been revised. 6. Comment: Revision dates need to be reflected on all civil plans due to this redesign. Response: Revision dates and clouds are reflected on plans. Comment: Civil Sheet C3.1 does not show the retention pond on the north side, the sidewalk bridge to the docks over the retention pond and the required curbing of this northern pavement edge. Revise. It is noted that this edge of pavement is adjacent to a vertical wall retention pond approximately 1.5 feet deep and may be suggested to have something more substantial than curbing only to prevent a vehicle or pedestrian from falling into the retention pond. Response: The retention pond has been revised along with required curbing. Bollards have been added to protect cars and pedestrians from falling into the pond. 8. Comment. Need to provide a height dimension for the garage opening on the south elevation. Will there be a gate for this opening? There must be a minimum of 8'-2" minimum clearance for ADA van-accessible parking spaces (clear of lights, pipes, etc.). Response: A note has been added to our staking plan that 8'2 minimum clearance for ADA van-accessibility is provided The ADA parking space clear height is 9'-0including pipes, lighting, etc. The drive isle will also maintain a clear opening height of 8'-2 ". Comment: There are parking spaces where visibility by the driver is blocked by solid walls or columns. Need to provide means to aid motorists when backing out blindly from these spaces. Response: Mirrors and mirror detail have been added for better visibility. 10. Comment: 1. have had Solid Waste look at these revised plans. Black barrels are not acceptable for five units and a rolling dumpster(s) must be provided. If the barrel storage area is proposed for the dumpster(s), then access through the doors appear to be an issue, since we have to assume a vehicle can be parked in the handicap parking space. Additionally, Solid Waste indicated there will be no dumpster staging area required, as all other condos in this area place their dumpsters in the roadway at the curb for pickup. Response: The concrete dumpster staging pad has been removed from the plans. Dumpster will be located in room where original black cans were to be stored. Door at the dumpster closet has been changed to a roll-up door that will not swing into the ADA parking space safety zone. Note has been added to plans calling for a roll-out dumpster. Revised plans are attached herewith addressing comments regarding minor modifications to plans. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Christy Butler Project Manager cllristyb!?fisllerarch itects.corn Fisher & Associates, LLC. 2315 Belleair Rd. Clearwater, Fl. 33764 727-443-4436 Fax (727) 531-6653 727-488-0986 cell ? „'? ? • Pagel of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 11:45 AM To: 'Christy Butler; Doreen Williams; Renee Ruggiero Cc: Lopez, Michael; Tefft, Robert Subject: Minor Revision for FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd (Regatta Bay) Christy - I have reviewed the proposed Minor Revision plans and have the following issues that need to be addressed prior to the issuance of a Development Order: J 1. The original site plan approved by the CDB reduced the east side setback to seven feet. The proposal reduces this east side setback to 6.5 feet. Section 4-406.A.4 for Minor Revisions prohibits any additional reduction to setbacks from that approved by the CDB. It is noted that, since the original approval of this project, the parking stall length has been revised from 19 to 18 feet. 2. The original site plan approved by the CDB reduced the north rear setback to 18 feet (to building) and to 15 feet (to pavement). The proposal reduces this north rear setback to 14.8 feet to pavement. It is unclear if the setback to building has been modified to be less than 18 feet. Section 4-406.A.4 for Minor Revisions prohibits any additional reduction to setbacks from that approved by the CDB. J 3. Fireplaces are indicated in each unit, but the elevations do not show any chimney above the roof. Are the fireplaces gas-fueled and vented internally? J4. The north elevation does not indicate the bay window on the right-hand side, as properly indicated on the left- hand side of the south elevation. 5. Only civil Sheet C3.1 has been submitted showing how the building and sidewalks are situated on the site. No Sheet L1.1 (Landscape Plan) has been submitted and is not required per se at this time. With the building redesign, the southern stairwell has been shown egressing to a sidewalk parallel with the southern property line connecting the driveway and the required egress sidewalk from the northern stairwell. This sidewalk parallel with the southern property line connecting the driveway and the required egress sidewalk from the northern stairwell reduces the landscape area available from that previously approved by the CDB. To create a larger planting area consistent with that approved by the CDB, run a sidewalk straight out from the southern stairwell egress door to the sidewalk within the right-of-way and remove the sidewalk parallel with the southern property line connecting the driveway and the required egress sidewalk from the northern stairwell. J Revision dates need to be reflected on all civil plans due to this redesign. ?aV,, 7Civil Sheet C3.1 does not show the retention pond on the north side, the sidewalk bridge to the docks over the retention pond and the required curbing of this northern pavement edge. Revise. It is noted that this edge of pavement is adjacent to a vertical wall retention pond approximately 1.5 feet deep and may be suggested to have something more substantial than curbing only to prevent a vehicle or pedestrian from falling into the retention pond. f 8. Need to provide a height dimension for the garage opening on the south elevation. Will there be a gate for this opening? There must be a minimum of 8'-2" minimum clearance for ADA van-accessible parking spaces (clear of lights, pipes, etc.). 9. There are parking spaces where visibility by the driver is blocked by solid walls or columns. Need to provide means to aid motorists when backing out blindly from these spaces. 10. 1 have had Solid Waste look at these revised plans. Black barrels are not acceptable for five units and a rolling dumpster(s) must be provided. If the barrel storage area is proposed for the dumpster(s), then access through the doors appear to be an issue, since we have to assume a vehicle can be parked in the handicap parking space. Additionally, Solid Waste indicated there will be no dumpster staging area required, as all other condos in this area place their dumpsters in the roadway at the curb for pickup. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please call or email me. Please resubmit one set of revised plans addressing the above comments. Should these revised plans be acceptable, then a Minor Revision Development Order would be issued. Once a Development Order is issued, then revised plans, including completely revised civil and landscape plans, may be resubmitted for Building Permit #BCP2008-04399. 12/31/2008 r Page 2 of 2 Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Christy Butler [mailto:christyb@fisherarchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 8:48 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Doreen Williams; Renee Ruggiero Subject: Minor Revision for FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd (Regatta Bay) Happy Holidays - to all Wayne - Can you please email us a copy of the approval or any comments/conditions regarding the above Minor Revisions review. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Christy Butler Project Manager Fisher & Associates, LLC. 2315 Belleair Rd. Clearwater, Fl. 33764 Chris Ba>,fisherarchitects.com 727-443-4436 Fax (727) 531-6653 727-488-0986 cell This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. 12/31/2008 FISHER AND ASSOCIATES, LLC. 2315 Belleair Road Clearwater, FL. 33764 (727) 443-4436 (727) 531-6653 (fax) City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-562-4504 ATTENTION: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner DATE: I November 05, 2008 ? Hand Delivered ? Fed-Ex ? Other CASE NO: FLD2005-07080 - Regatta Bay Condos ® Regular Mail r-1 FTP UPLOAD COPIES— 'DATE ) • 1 11/05/08 Fisher and Associates, Inc., _ Payment for application fee for the Minor Revisions Review. REMARKS: Mr. Wells - Please find enclosed a check in the amount of $400.00 for the application fee of the Minor Revisions Review. We look forward to your approval or comments regarding the revisions. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Christy Butler FILE: Christy Butler Project Manager qpipipi THANK • • • 1111 M 11 ? III! • • Wells, Wayne From: Christy Butler [christyb@fisherarchitects.com] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:15 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Minor Revision for FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd Wayne -.I do apologize,. I will get the check processed and bring it over asap. Thank you for the reminder. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Christy Butler Project Manager Fisher & Associates, LLC. 2315 Belleair Rd. Clearwater, F1. 33764 ChristyB@fisherarchitects.com 727-443-4436 Fax (727) 531-6653 727-488-0986 cell This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions. expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those. of the. company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:00 PM To: Christy Butler Subject: Minor Revision for FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd Christy - I did not find with what you submitted today for the Minor Revision the application fee of $400. Could you please drop it by or mail it? Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 1 FISHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2315 Belleair Road Clearwater, FL. 33764 (727) 443-4436 (727) 531-6653 (fax) SENT VIA: ® Hand Delivered ? Fed-Ex ? Other ? Regular Mail ? FTP UPLOAD REMARKS: City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 ATTENTION: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner DATE: I July 22, 2008 I CASE NO: I FLD2005-07080 - Regatta Bay Condos I Mr. Wells - Please find enclosed 1 set of revised; floor plans, elevations, site plan and rendering models, along with a letter explaining our request for minor revisions to the development order referenced above. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, ORIGINAL RECEIVED Christy Butler 2008 FILE: COPY TO: CITY OF C1 FAQ?"e r; •? ; Christy Butler Project Manager 0 0 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND OTHER PROCEDURES after receipt of comments from the development review committee. A minor revision is one which: 1. Does not result in conflicts in on-site circulation and/or negative impacts with ingress/egress. 2. Does not change the use unless such change is of a similar or less intensity, as deter- mined by the community development coordinator. Does not increase the density or intensity of the development 4. Does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area. 5. Does not result in a substantial change to the location of a structure previously ap- proved. 6. Does not result in a substantial modifica- tion or the cancellation of any condition placed upon the application as originally approved. Does not add property to the parcel pro- posed for development. 8. Does not increase the height of the build- ings in a manner that will change the overall height of the project, will not alter the scale of the project, does not exceed the maximum height permitted in by the applicable special area plan and zoning district. 9. Any other minor revision that does not substantially alter the character and de- sign of the project. B. Other revisions. Any other adjustments or changes not specified as "minor" shall be granted only in accordance with the procedures for origi- nal approval. (Ord. No. 7106-03, § 22, 9-18-03; Ord. No. 7631- 06, § 1, 11-2-06) Section 4-407. Expiration of a Level Two ap- proval. Unless otherwise specified in the approval, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of the date of the Level Two approval, and all required certificates of occu- § 4-407 pancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Permitted time frames do not change with succes- sive owners. An extension of time to initiate a building permit may be granted by the commu- nity development coordinator provided it is for a period not to exceed one year, is for the project originally approved and provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The community devel- opment coordinator may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments which would significantly af- fect the project. The community development board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit applica- tion. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The community development board must receive the request for this extension within the one-year period of validity after the original ex- tension approved by the community development coordinator. Good causes may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national econ- omy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. In the event a project is governed by a development agreement, the timeframes estab- lished in the agreement shall supercede these requirements. The community development board may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments which would significantly affect the project. Amend- ments which will require no or minor amend- ments (as provided by section 4-406.A) may be approved. Amendments which will require a ma- jor revision to the subject project shall be required to be approved as part of a new Level Two application. Transfer of development rights are exempt from this provision. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 7106-03, § 23, 9-18-03) Supp. No. 17 CD4:20.1 s FISHER ANT ASSOCIATES,. LLC Architects, Planners, Interior Designers July 21, 2008 Mr. Wayne Wells, Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Request for minor revisions to an approved CDB submittal Regatta Bay / Case No. FLD2005-07080 Dear Mr. Wells; RECEIVED 2 ID 2008 C 1Y OF C4N.I:Ac'vl.V ER Please accept this request for minor revisions to the approved CDB submittal referenced as Case No. FLD2005-07080, as permitted within Section 4-406 of the City Code granting the Community Development Coordinator the authorization to allow minor revisions to an approved Level Two development. The modifications to the previously approved CDB submittal are required to increase the constructability of the project and to facilitate compliance with applicable building and life safety codes. The modifications requiring minor revisions are as follows: 1. Building Plans: a. The revised plans correct ingress/egress and on-site circulation conflicts within the previously approved plans. The stairways have been properly calculated, providing the required ingress/egress to each unit per FHA and NFPA requirements. b. The revised plans have eliminated the two town homes. The town homes as depicted on the upper floors were not properly accessible per FHA and NFPA requirements. The revised plans have been amended to locate "flat" units on each of the top two floors eliminating the multi-story town homes. 2. Elevations: a. The originally approved elevations did not provide the proper calculation of openings per the Florida Building Code 2004 with 2006&07 revisions. The proposed elevations have been revised to meet the opening area limitation requirements of the Florida Building Code. b. The originally approved elevations specified a roof shingle 30'-0" above grade. There are no product approvals available for the application of roof shingles above 30'-0" so the material has been substituted with concrete barrel tile which has the required product approvals. c. The originally approved elevations show some roof elements which are not constructible. The elevations have been modified to increase the constructability of the structure. AA 0001344 2315 Belleair Road, Clearwater, Florida 33764 (727) 443-4436 o Fax (727) 531-6653 o www.fisherarchitects.com i Request for minor revisions to an approved CDB submittal Regatta Bay / Case No. FLD2005-07080 Page 2 In support to this request, as the Architect of Record for the project, I am able to recite the following: 1. The revised plans do not change the use or intensity of the originally approved development order. 2. The revised plans do not change the density or intensity of the originally approved development order. 3. The revised plans do not result in any landscape reduction of the originally approved development order. The revised plans have actually increased the landscape area by removing the front yard staging area pad and utilizing black barrels. 4. The revised plans do not result in any change to the location of the originally approved structure. 5. The revised plans and elevations do not result in any substantial modification or cancellation of any condition placed upon the originally approved development ordered. 6. The revised plans and elevations do not add any additional property to this parcel. 7. The revised plans and elevations do not increase the height of the originally approved structure. It is my sincere hope that you will grant the requested minor revisions to the approved CDB submittal. It is our view that the requested changes will serve to better the project and its relationship of both the residence and the citizens of the City of Clearwater by increasing the buildings constructability and resolving what appear to be severe Life Safety issues. On behalf of all those involve with this project, I request that you approve the requested minor revisions to the previously approved CDB submittal. William Jo i er, JI.A President / Fisher an ssociates. LLC AA 0001344 2315 Belleair Road, Clearwater, Florida 33764 (727) 443-4436 *Fax (727) 531-6653 •www.fisherarchitects.com 0 0 0 0 0 ------------- -- 1_ 0 0 w?G r OF, ? I-?- n lull ? 1 ??'I,ti . '- ??r`-O/---7?/I?f T-=i -?rR ------ • • Wells, Wayne From: Christy Butler [christyb@fisherarchitects.com] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 9:52 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Minor Revision for FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd Thank you - It went out in today's mail, you should receive it by Monday. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Christy Butler Project Manager Fisher & Associates, LLC. 2315 Belleair Rd. Clearwater, F1. 33764 ChristyB@fisherarchitects.com 727-443-4436 Fax (727) 531-6653 727-488-0986 cell This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 7:52 AM To: Christy Butler Subject: Minor Revision for FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd You can mail it or drop it off. -----Original Message----- From: Christy Butler [mailto:christyb@fisherarchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 1:49 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Minor Revision for FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd Hi Wayne - Regarding the above - The client's attorney has released the $400.00 application fee check for the Minor Revisions. Should I mail the check to you or should we resubmit the plans with the check for your review? Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Christy Butler Project Manager Fisher & Associates, LLC. 2315 Belleair Rd. 1 Clearwater, F1. 33764 ChristyB@fisherarchitects.com 727-443-4436 Fax (727) 531-6653 727-488-0986 cell This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:00 PM To: Christy Butler Subject: Minor Revision for FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd Christy - I did not find with what you submitted today for the Minor Revision the application fee of $400. Could you please drop it by or mail it? Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 2 ,TiCP2008-04399, 862 Bayway Blvd. Page 1 of 2 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 11:29 AM To: 'Christy Butler' Subject: BCP2008-04399, 862 Bayway Blvd. Christy - There is nothing on the website to find. For Minor Revisions, please submit a letter of request to me outlining the changes from the originally CDB approved project with the reason(s) for the changes (please reference Case No. FLD2005-07080). There is a $400.00 application fee (check made out to City of Clearwater). I need one set of the revised plans (site, elevations and floor plans). Once submitted, we will review the submission and will interact with all necessary departments in order to make a final determination. A Development Order will be issued, which could add additional conditions of approval (conditions beyond that approved by the CDB), based on the revisions requested. Upon the issuance of the Development Order for the minor revisions where we approve, or approve with conditions, then resubmit revised plans to Development Services for BCP2008-04399. The criteria from the Code for Minor Revisions is as follows: Section 4-406. Changes to Level Two development approvals. A. Minor revisions. The community development coordinator is authorized to allow minor revisions to an approved Level Two approved after receipt of comments from the development review committee. A minor revision is one which: 1. Does not result in conflicts in on-site circulation and/or negative impacts with ingress/egress. 2. Does not change the use unless such change is of a similar or less intensity, as determined by the community development coordinator. 3. Does not increase the density or intensity of the development 4. Does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area. 5. Does not result in a substantial change to the location of a structure previously approved. 6. Does not result in a substantial modification or the cancellation of any condition placed upon the application as originally approved. 7. Does not add property to the parcel proposed for development. 8. Does not increase the height of the buildings in a manner that will change the overall height of the project, will not alter the scale of the project, does not exceed the maximum height permitted in by the applicable special area plan and zoning district. 9. Any other minor revision that does not substantially alter the character and design of the project. B. Other revisions. Any other adjustments or changes not specified as "minor" shall be granted only in accordance with the procedures for original approval. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Christy Butler [maiIto: christyb@fisherarchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 11:46 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: BCP2008-04399, 862 Bayway Blvd. Wayne - Thank you for meeting with us yesterday afternoon. Would you mind emailing me a copy of the process requirements/application or point out where we can locate it on the website? As always, thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. 7/3/2008 BCP2008-04399, 862 Bayway Blvd. Page 2 of 2 .11 0 Thank you, Christy Butler Project Manager Fisher & Associates, LLC. 2315 Belleair Rd.. Clearwater, Fl. 33764 ChristyB@fisherarchitects.com 727-443-4436 Fax(727)531-6653 727-488-0986 cell This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. 7/3/2008 BCP2008-04399 0 • Wells, Wayne Page 1 of 1 From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5:49 PM To: 'Christy. Butler' Subject: BCP2008-04399, 862 Bayway Blvd. Christy - Sorry for the delay in my response. I get a lot of emails and your email got pushed down where I couldn't see it anymore. However, I have time on Monday or Tuesday next week, morning or afternoon (up to 3 pm). Let me know what works for you. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Christy Butler [mailto:christyb@fisherarchitects.com] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:05 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: BCP2008-04399 Importance: High Wayne - Regarding the above referenced application, we would like to schedule a meeting to discuss the design with you. Please respond as to what is good for your schedule next week or the week after. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Christy Butler Project Manager Fisher & Associates, Inc. 2315 Belleair Rd. Clearwater, Fl. 33764 ChristyB@fisherarchitects.com 727-443-4436 Fax (727) 531-6653 727-488-0986 cell 6/25/2008 FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Blvd. Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 4:03 PM To: 'Christy Butler' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Blvd. Christy - You should contact Sherry Watkins (562-4582) for copies and the cost thereof. You should also come in and look at the folder to ascertain what you want copied, so as to economize your expenses. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Christy Butler [mailto:christyb@fisherarchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 3:53 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Blvd. Importance: High Wayne - hope you are doing well - I am with Fisher Architects now. Bill Fisher is requesting a full copy of the folder for the above referenced FLD case. Please let me know when we can pick it up and what the fee is for the copy. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Christy Butler Project Manager Fisher & Associates, Inc. 2315 Belleair Rd. Clearwater, Fl. 33764 ChristyB@fisherarchitects.com 727-443-4436 Fax (727) 531-6653 727-488-0986 cell 5/6/2008 TTY OF LE A RWA°T °E POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 18, 2007 Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Ruggiero: On April 17, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 862 Bayway Boulevard shall be submitted by April 18, 2008. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:IPlanningDepartmentlCD BIFLEX(FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications lBayway 862 Regatta Bay (T) -ApprovedlBayway 862 CDB Time Extension Development Order 4.18.07.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL. JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 5:13 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Boulevard Renee - Attached is the Development Order for the Time Extension for the above referenced case, where the Community Development Board (CDB) took action at their meeting of April 17, 2007. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne Bayway 862 CDB Time Extension ... 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 5:24 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: Staff Report for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting Renee - Attached is the Staff Report for the time extension for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting for the following case: • FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Boulevard. This case is being placed on the consent agenda for this meeting. Wayne I NN Bayway 862 Time Extension Memo... 0 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:30 AM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Blvd. Renee - The requested Time Extension for this project has been scheduled for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting, which is at 1:00 pm. Wayne February 22, 2007 Community Development Board c/o Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: FLD2005-07080 862 Bay Way Blvd Regatta Bay Dear Mr. Delk: ORIGINAL 4p RECEIVED CAB 2 3 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CIVIL C LAND PLANNING G ENVIRONMENTAL C TRANSPORTATION G On October 18, 2005 the Community Development Board granted approval of the above referenced project. The subsequent six month extension approved for this Development Order expires on April 18, 2007; therefore we respectfully request an additional one year extension to the approved development order. Unfortunately, we find this one year extension request necessary due to the extreme downward turn in the condominium market within Florida. Please be assured we are moving forward with architectural plan development for permitting but need to proceed slowly making many allowances for the current market situation. We look forward to the completion of this project and know the finished product will be a development everyone can be proud of. Please accept this letter as our formal request for an extension of one year and to place this request on the next available CDB agenda for consideration. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this request; we look forward to receiving a confirmation of the hearing date. Respectfully, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner cc: NES File #536 " N. Pelzer " = > Rogers Beach Development P. Stough, Architect 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRIN6.COM 4.;. , NESTECH@MINDSPRIN6.C0M t*+ 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 8036 Pinellas County Property Appr Information: 17 29 15 16519 000 1010 Page 2 of 5 17 / 29 / 15 / 05058 / 004 / 0150 07-Mar-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:24:58 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales REGATTA BAY OF CLEARWATER LLC OBK: 14574 OPG: 0557 200 BRIGHTWATER DR # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767-2452 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.0 2 2004 - 2005 l f sa es rom : 2,079,400 Sale Date OR Book/P age Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 9 /2,005 14,5741 557 2,000,000 (Q) I 1960: Book 055 Pgs 019-020 0 /1,976 4,417/ 447 91,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { ) 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 1,720,900 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 1,720,900 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1,720,900 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: CU Seawall: Frontage: Bay Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 37,453.67 1) 60 x 120 250. 00 7,200. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 37,453.67 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 37,453.67 Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 6 UNIT C BLK D, LOT 16 Description Building Information http://l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=17... 3/7/2007 Pinellas County Property Appr r Information: 17 29 15 16519 000 1010 17 29 / 15 1 05058 1 004 I 0100 Page 3 of 5 07-Mar-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 18:24:58 Vacant Parcel Property Use; 290 Land Use; 00 Vacant Extra F?2?-lures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) DOCK 23X22 40.00 506 20,240 8,100 1,974 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 81100 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*_1®®®MFq http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=17... 3/7/2007 Pinellas County Property Apprer Information: 17 29 15 16519 000 1010 0 HARBOR -- ---I X022 5076 -+ L AYC) 5 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) Page 4 of 5 ?I6SI9? L- r - BLVD 50 A f fir; t?IC? E BLVD http://136.174.187.131htbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=17... 3/7/2007 t'ifle las tYounty Propor€y ;' ppr-iser information: 17 19 15 16519 000 1010 I' gt, 5 of Pinellas C otinty Property Appraiser Parcel Information itlrl?;!,''1 E5.1 "4 l ?1 ', l r 1t?)lili? i_ul ick'?o l < G?::I t?::: l c > l u r=- l t.;u' 5 _:: €3:.l qtr ? x::17.., 1," 2007 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 2:08 PM To: 'Renee Ruggiero' Subject: RE: FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Boulevard - Regatta Bay Renee - You need to send in a letter requesting a one-year (if that is what you desire to request) time extension, along with the reasons for the time extension (see Section 4-407). The time extension request is not a public hearing item, but the CDB must take action on the request prior to the expiration date of. April 18, 2007. So, make sure the request is submitted timely (you do not need to wait to the last minute, as you could submit it today). There is no fee. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:Renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 11:08 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Boulevard - Regatta Bay Wayne, On October 2, 2006 we received approval for a six month extension to the development order for the above referenced project. The approved extension will expire on April 18, 2007; the developer has asked us to determine the process to request an additional extension. It is my understanding that the CDB can grant an additional one year extension for the project originally approved beyond the six month extension approved by the Planning Director. Please would you provide information relating to the process to request an additional extension to this development order? Thank you for your assistance, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Herthside Engineering Services, inc. 601 Cleveland St, #930 Clearwater, FL 33755 T 727.443.2869 / F727.446.8036 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/594 - Release Date: 12/20/2006 1/3/2007 F 1 LONG RANGE PLANNING DFVrI.OPMENT RFVIEW Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Ruggiero: October 2, 2006 On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to nine feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and from 10 feet to eight feet (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 77 feet (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (October 18, 2006). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On September 13, 2006, you submitted a request for a six-month time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited the problem of rising construction costs requiring rebidding of the project. Since the approval of this project, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per unit. This project was approved with eight parking spaces for five attached dwelling units, at a parking ratio of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. PRANK 1111MARD, MAYOR 0 40 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OPI.-IcF Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SrRVICEs BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TI:LrPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Jocm DoRAN, Co1;Ncll.\ll?.\1HI(R I10)T I IANlll:fc)N, CohWILMEMBF.R B11.1. JoNSON, CUl NCII.ml[:Vlfl{it CARLFN A. Prn;RSI:N, Cot Nr.ii.arn:>nsi;R "EQ[W. 1?MPLOYiMENT AND Al;l i1,'MATIVI: ACTION I;;\il'LO1'I?R October 2, 2006 Ruggiero - Page Two In considering the above changes to the Code and Beach by Design, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension to April 18, 2007, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 862 Bayway Boulevard. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael e k, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX(FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslBayway 862 Regatta Bay (T) - ApprovedWayway 862 Time Ext. Dev. Order 10.2.06doc Horthside September 13, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33765 RE: FLD2005-07080 862 Bay Way Blvd Regatta Bay Dear Mr. Wells: CIVIL* LAND PLANNING • ENV[ RONMENTAL* TRANSPORTATION • On October 18, 2005 the Community Development Board granted approval of the above referenced project. The Development Order issued to this site expires on October 18, 2006. During the past year, construction costs and materials have increased at such a rate that the previously received bids for this project are no longer valid. We hereby respectfully request a six month extension to the Development Order to allow additional time to send out new bids for proposals of work. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this development project. Renee Ruggiero, Project P anner 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MI NDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 `Clearwater U September 05, 2006 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, FI 33755 s CITY OF CLE•ARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM RE: Notification of Expiration of Development Order - FLD2005-07080 - 862 BAYWAY BLVD Dear Applicant : This is a courtesy notification that the approvals under the above referenced Development Order for Case Number FLD2005-07080 will expire and become null and void unless an application for a building permit is made prior to: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 This is the only notice you will receive regarding the expiration of the above referenced case. If you have any questions, contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, H - &)t& Wayne ells Planner III Development Order Expiration - FLD2005-07080 - 862 BAYWAY BLVD C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Development Order - FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Boulevard Dear Mr. Ghovaee: October 19, 2005 This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to nine feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and from 10 feet to eight feet (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 77 feet (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2- 803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That trash and recycling room design, sizes and locations meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site and landscape plans be amended to screen parking from view along the east side by a minimum four-foot high solid landscaped fence or wall; 4. That any future freestanding sign be monument-style, a maximum four feet in height and designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL. JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL MEDIBER HOYT HAXIILTON, COUNCII.MEMBER CARLEN A. PETFRSEN, COUNCIL INIENIBF.R "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMA'TM? ACTION EMPLOYER" October 19, 2005 Ghovaee - Page 2 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 6. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. That boats moored at the existing or future docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; 8. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 9. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 10. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 11. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 12. That a stop bar be provided for exiting vehicles on the driveway before the public sidewalk. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (October 18, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-5023 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 1, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michatl elk, AIO Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartrnenllC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicationsWayway 862 Regatta Bay (T) - ApprovedWayway 862 Development Order.doc 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 6:09 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Blvd - Request for continuance by a neighbor Renee - Attached is a letter from a neighbor to the above referenced case requesting a continuance to the next CDB meeting. Thought you should know. Wayne Email form Lucille Watts re re... 009,18/2006 11:56 7274468#0 Northside FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 18, 20061 TO: Mr. Wayne Wells OF: Clearwater Planning CIVIL LANDSCAPE ENYI ONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION a TIME: 1.2:10pm PAGE 1 OF FAX NO: 562-4865 FROM: Au el Haines, Executive Administrative Assistant PROJECT NAME: Regatta Bay I FLD2005-07080 COMMENTS: Enclosed is the extension request and development order. Thanks! 4 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT OUR OFFICE SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS PROJECT. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 .T (727) 443-28691E (727) 4468036 E-MAIL: ADMIN ,NO,RITHSIDEENGINEERING. COM.. NORTHSIDE ENGS PAGE 01/04 NORTHSIDE ENG September 13, 2006 Mr- 'Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33765 RE: FLD2005-07080 862 Bay Way Blvd Regatta Bay Dear Mr. Wells: PAGE 02104 CIVIL • LAND PLANNING a ENVIRONMENTAL • TRAN5PORTATION 0 On October 18, 2005 the Community Development Board granted approval of the above referenced project. The Development Order issued to this site expires on October 18, 2006. During the past Year, construction costs and materials have increased at such a rate that the previously received bids for this project are no longer valid, We hereby respectfully request a. six month extension to the Development Order to allow additional time to send out new bids for proposals of work- Should you require additional clarification or information, please.feel free to contact me. Thank You in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this development project. e? • Ruggiero, Project P. saner cc: NES 536 File N. Pelur 601 CLEVELAND STREET, 5UITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NE5ADMINOWIND5PRINC,COM NESTECH0iMIND5PRING,CoM 727 - 443 - 2869 FAX 7,27 - 446 - 8036 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 5:15 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: Staff Report for FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Boulevard Renee - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced case, to be heard by the Community Development Board on October 18, 2005, at 1:00 pm. Wayne : Bayway 862 Staff Report.doc Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 5:03 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Cc: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FW: objection letter to change at 862 Bayway Blvd. FYI- -----Original Message----- From: Rudy Michalek [mailto:rmichalekphs@phsinc.kscoxmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 4:11 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: michalek@mindspring.com Subject: objection letter to change at 862 Bayway Blvd. To the Community Development Board c/o Wayne Wells, AICP, Planner My name is Rudy Michalek and I own a Unit at 855 Bayway Blvd. I am writing to you to express my objections to the changes being requested for the building at 862 Bayway Blvd. In general, I am objecting to the multiple requests for reductions, deviations and in essence, variances from that which applies to everyone else. If you review all of the changes that have occurred on Bayway Blvd, you will note that the new buildings have encroached unequally upon the roadway. This may lead to increased accidents and traffic issues in the future. The continual redevelopment is leading to a higher density of units on Clearwater Beach, and therefore, more people, more cars, higher needs for utilities services, etc. Has a review study been done or updated to show the impact of the density to available services and traffic movement? Specifically, our objections to the requested changes include: 1.) The reduction/ elimination of green area. 2.) The reduction in setbacks particularly on the front and sides. 3.) The enclosed stairway on the front of the building minimizing the distance to the street. 4.) The overhangs from the building encroaching on the lot line as they appear on certain but not all,elevation drawings. 5.) The reduction in the minimum lot size. 6.) The building ground plan square footage to the lot square footage, i.e. the ratio of the two. There may be other items including height, but I have not had a chance to review more of the plans. Thank you in advance for your review and discussion of our objections. Sincerely, Rudy and Chris Michalek Rudy Michalek 785-273-3383 - voice 785-273-1814 - fax 214-418-6307- cell 10/13/2005 C I T Y OF C L E A R W A TE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33758-4748 $0 B 4TE?k j'$ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 30, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-07080) Dear Mr. Ghovaee: The Case No. FLD2005-07080 for Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to nine feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and from 10 feet to eight feet (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 77 feet (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B, for property located at 862 Bayway Boulevard, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on October 18, 2005. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, ,.'P- M - W" Waye M. Wells, AICP Plainer III S: IPlanaing DeparprlentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for die next CDMBayway 862 Regatta Bay (T) - 10.18.05 CDB - WWIBayway 862 CDB Letter.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIUARD, COMMISSIONER BII.1. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Northside September 19, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd. - NES #536 DRC Response Dear Mr. Wells: • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • imECHVED SEP 19 2W5 ROF DEPARTMENT Please see our responses below. P CLEARWl4TER 1. "The stairwell on the west side shown on the civil site plan and the architectural site plan is not the same size as that shown on the typical 1st to 3rd floor plans. Advise/revise." There is 10 feet ,gm the first (ground) floor to the second floor and 10'-8" from the second to the third floor, or only 8" greater than the first to second floor. There are seven risers to the half floor landing in the stairs from the first to the second floor, yet 10 risers to the half floor landing in the stairs from the second to the third floor. The concern originally raised is that the stairwell depicted on the first floor, if it must grow in length to that depicted for the second to third floor, is that the stairwell will protrude into the handicap access aisle and then not be in compliance with Code requirements (since the minimum number of parking spaces is being provided). Please advise as to whether there is a problem or not." Response: Architect has had discussions with Wayne Wells and according to architect, issue has been resolved. 2. "Remove from the 4th Floor plan the roofing pattern from the front balcony. Is this front balcony used by both the penthouse owners??" Patti explained in detail how the front stairs went to the fourth floor and that this was the entry, even though the plans did not show what Patti was speaking of. The revised plans indicate "entry" on this "balcony" that appears shared by both penthouse units, as I questioned before and I still don't see any stairs to this fourth floor in the front as Patti explained at DRC. I need to know how this is working." Response: Architect has had discussions with Wayne Wells and according to architect, issue has been resolved. 601 CLEV CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 3. "Is the 6th Floor accessible area to the penthouse units and the widow's walk above also accessible? If so, how?" The response to this DRC comment is that the lighthouse is decorative only and has a service door for maintenance personnel and is not intended to be used as occupied space. I have serious concerns regarding this lighthouse, as I see a spiral stair on the fifth floor (assumed to extend to the lighthouse), which means that it is occupied space, allowing the resident to access the open deck on the lighthouse level. Is this correct? How are you providing Building Code tenant separation between the units in the lighthouse? If the spiral staircase does not go to the lighthouse level, how will the "maintenance personnel" access it?" Response: Architect has had discussions with Wayne Wells and according to architect, issue has been resolved. Note roof patio only accessible to tenants lightroom for maintenance personnel only; not occupiable space. ELAND STREET, SUITE 930 y± ORIGINAL Page 1 of 3 4. "Indicate the location of outdoor a/c units on the 5th floor plan. How does a repairman access these units (penthouse unit owners must allow repairman to go thru their unit to access the a/c units???)?" First, I find on the floor plans on Sheet A-1 four air condensing units shown, yet there are five dwelling units (?). Are these condensing units only for the penthouse units? Are the condensing units for the second, third and fourth floor next to the stairs on the west side? If so, how does a repairman access these condensing units on the second, third and fourth floors? Second, it still appears to me that the repairman must enter the penthouse unit on the fourth floor, go up the spiral stairs to the fifth floor and outside to the air condensing units to repair them. Is this still correct? I still have serious concerns with the location of the a/c units and this arrangement of repair, which does not appear to work. If one condensing unit must be replaced, how will that occur?" Response: Architect has had discussions with Wayne Wells and according to architect, issue has been resolved. Fire 1. "Trash staging area must be 10' from exit stair. PRIOR TO CDB." Response: Stair has been enclosed, therefore separation is no longer required per Lenny Rickard with Fire. 2. "An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. to be located above BFE. Emergency lighting should can also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB." Response: Architect has had discussions with Wayne Wells and according to architect, issue has been resolved. 3. "Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. must be within 300' of building as hose lays and on same side of street as building This hydrant is in addition to the new one to be used for fire systems. PRIOR TO CDB." Response: Additional fire hydrant added to plan. Solid Waste 1. "Permanent placement of recycling carts can not be in visibility triangle. 09-12-05 Recycling carts still shown in visibility triangle." Response: Placement of recycling carts and trash on staging area is not permanent. Staging area is to be used only on dates of pick up. With regard to Fire comment #1, it was discussed at DRC to relocate the trash staging to the east side of the driveway. Response: Trash staging area as provided meets requirements, relocating it to the east side of driveway would not move it out of the visibility triangle. In addition to not providing sufficient space for the staging area. With regard to Solid Waste's comment, Tom Glenn has looked at the plans and the trash room on the first/ground level is too small for one dumpster plus the recycling bins. Inside this trash room, from door to back of wall is only five feet, insufficient for a dumpster. Response: Architect has had discussions with Wayne Wells and according to architect, room is of sufficient size. Page 2 of 3 0 0 There is no room for the recycling bins. Tom recommended a 10'x10' trash room, or at a barest of minimums an 8'x8' trash room. The recycling bins cannot be stored outside, especially in the staging area in the front setback. Response: a storage area has been added under front stairwell for recycling bins, Architect has had discussions with Wayne Wells and according to architect, issue has been resolved. If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. Sincerely, Renee Ruggiero Project Planner Page 3 of 3 Northside ?9? sow 9?. CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: September 19, 2005 w To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III City of Clearwater y ORI GI 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 NAL Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: Regatta Bay/862 Bayway Blvd NES Proj# 536 We Transmit: Enclosed Under Separate Cover X Originals Mail UPS Overnight X Prints y Pick-Up X Hand Delivered Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Per Your Request For Your Review & Comment Floppy Disk X For Your Use For Your Approval For Your Files For Your Information Date I Descrinti 1115 I Sets (4 Sheets) Of Civil And Landscape Plans, 1 Signed I? And Sealed Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. t By: Renee Ruggiero, Project Plan 'Tier Copies To: FILE N. Pelzer A. Haines 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 RECEIVED sEP 19 2or9 pC yp GD( q?W?,IERNT • 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Renee Ruggiero [Renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:45 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Lenny. Rickard@myClearwater.com Cc: parch@aol.com Subject: FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd. - NES # 536 - Regatta Bay Dear Wayne: I spoke with Fire Inspector Lenny Rickard this morning and he informed me that all Fire related issues have been resolved with the revised plans. Inspector Rickard requested that we provide you with a quick E-Mail stating the following: The Architect agrees that the plans when submitted for permitting, will include the required enclosure of the stairs at the front of the building and will provide the 2 hour fire separation as required due to the stairs being located within 10' of the temporary trash staging area. Thank you for your assistance and direction. Respectfully, Renee Ruggiero 9/23/2005 Wells, Wayne From: Renee Ruggiero [Renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 8:23 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Blvd. This information will be responded to this morning, I understand you are under an extreme deadline and will respond expeditiously. It was my understanding Patti addressed these issues through her plans, please accept my apologies. The plans do not arrive early enough before submittal deadline for me to check that such things have actually been corrected. Respectfully, Renee Ruggiero -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 7:47 AM To: Renee Ruggiero; PARCH@GATE.NET Subject: FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Blvd. Renee/Patti - I have the following concerns regarding the above referenced project that must be resolved Monday morning to stay on course to the October 18, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. My DRC comment was: "The stairwell on the west side shown on the civil site plan and the architectural site plan is not the same size as that shown on the typical 1st to 3rd floor plans. Advise/revise." There is 10 feet from the first (ground) floor to the second floor and 101-8" from the second to the third floor, or only 8" greater than the first to second floor. There are seven risers to the half floor landing in the stairs from the first to the second floor, yet 10 risers to the half floor landing in the stairs from the second to the third floor. The concern originally raised is that the stairwell depicted on the first floor, if it must grow in length to that depicted for the second to third floor, is that the stairwell will protrude into the handicap access aisle and then not be in compliance with Code requirements (since the minimum number of parking spaces is being provided). Please advise as to whether there is a problem or not. 2. My DRC comment was: "Remove from the 4th Floor plan the roofing pattern from the front balcony. Is this front balcony used by both the penthouse owners??" Patti explained in detail how the front stairs went to the fourth floor and that this was the entry, even though the plans did not show what Patti was speaking of. The revised plans indicate "entry" on this "balcony" that appears shared by both penthouse units, as I questioned before and I still don't see any stairs to this fourth floor in the front as Patti explained at DRC. I need to know how this is working. 3. My DRC comment was: "Is the 6th Floor accessible area to the penthouse units and the widow's walk above also accessible? If so, how?" The response to this DRC comment is that the lighthouse is decorative only and has a service door for maintenance personnel and is not intended to be used as occupied space. I have serious concerns regarding this lighthouse, as I see a spiral stair on the fifth floor (assumed to extend to the lighthouse), which means that it is occupied space, allowing the resident to access the open deck on the lighthouse level. Is this correct? How are you providing Building Code tenant separation between the units in the lighthouse? If the spiral staircase 1 a Y f f i does not go to the lighthouse level, how will the "maintenance personnel" access it? 4. My DRC comment was: "Indicate the location of outdoor a/c units on the 5th floor plan. How does a repairman access these units (penthouse unit owners must allow repairman to go thru their unit to access the a/c units???)?" -First, I find on the floor plans on Sheet A-1 four air condensing units shown, yet there are five dwelling units (?). Are these condensing units only for the penthouse units? Are the condensing units for the second, third and fourth floor next to the stairs on the west side? If so, how does a repairman access these condensing units on the second, third and fourth floors? Second, it still appears to me that the repairman must enter the penthouse unit on the fourth floor, go up the spiral stairs to the fifth floor and outside to the air condensing units to repair them. Is this still correct? I still have serious concerns with the location of the a/c units and this arrangement of repair, which does not appear to work. If one condensing unit must be replaced, how will that occur? Renee/Patti - Since I am trying to set the October 18th CDB agenda, if these concerns cannot be addressed this morning, this case needs to be delayed to the November meeting. Please let me know ASAP. Wayne 2 T ? • . Page 2 of 2 Patti Patti the Architect, Inc 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, FI 34698 (727)733-3769 On Sep 19, 2005, at 10:54 AM, <Wavne.Wells a myClearwater.com> wrote: Renee/Patti - I have had Fire and Solid Waste look at the plans and the following comments are still outstanding: Fire: 1. Trash staging area must be 10' from exit stair. PRIOR TO CDB. 2. An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. to be located above BFE. Emergency lighting should can also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB. 3. Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. must be within 300' of building as hose lays and on same side of street as building This hydrant is in addition to the new one to be used for fire systems. PRIOR TO CDB. Solid Waste: 1. Permanent placement of recycling carts can not be in visibility triangle. 09-12-05 Recycling carts still. shown in visibility triangle. With regard to Fire comment #1, it was discussed at DRC to relocate the trash staging to the east side of the driveway. With regard to Solid Waste's comment, Tom Glenn has looked at the plans and the trash room on the first/ground level is too small for one dumpster plus the recycling bins. Inside this trash room, from door to back of wall is only five feet, insufficient for a dumpster. There is no room for the recycling bins. Tom recommended a 10'x10' trash room, or at a barest of minimums an 8'x8' trash room. The recycling bins cannot be stored outside, especially in the staging area in the front setback. Please include these items in your revisions. Wayne 9/23/2005 • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Patricia Stough [parch@gate.net] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 11:37 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Thompson, Neil; Delk, Michael Subject: Re: 862 Bayway Blvd. Hi Wayne! and all Northside is working the the modifications for the recycling as I type... I have modified all the other plans... addressing your 7:46 am e-mail... It will be difficult, but.... we are trying to have the modifications to you by noon... Hopefully you realize that it will be a miracle.. and might like to be a part of that miracle, by allowing us a few extra minutes.... Hopefully, my associate, Kasi, will be able to find a parking place... Wayne the 1st to 3rd floor stairwell is interior to the building. The ground to 1st floor only goes as a single run to the 1 st living floor. from that point on it is a u shape stair outside of the front yard setback to the top floor( yes the stair did not show up on your plan but you will see it when Kasi shows up with the revised plan) 1/2 of the stair is under roof. The garage to second floor within the parking area has additional risers on the second floor to compensate for the (2) additional risers. this will not effect the handicap parking space .... nor the access within the garage area. The condensers are located on each floor behind the air handler units (A/H) . Yes, you will need to access from within the unit. However this is more desirable for security purposes. Doors were in- advertly left off. As we did not believe panning should concern themselves with a building issue. The base of the light house ...(decorative, ambient lighting only. Will only be accessible to the wwest condominium, via a spiral stair. This stair will allow that owner access, and at the same time maintenance access to the lighting with the "feature". The lhr separation will be within the floor ceiling asssembly, again a building issue, not planning to the best of my knowledge and belief ...., Your "serious concerns" about the access to the condensors, are not part of the Development review code ..... and are easily "handled during the building plans review process.... PDF Plans to file to meet your 12:00 deadline.... hard copy on its way.... see next email 9/23/2005 Wells, Wayne From: Patricia Stough [parch@gate.net] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 11:38 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: 862 Bayway Patti Patti the Architect, Inc 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, F1 34698 (727)733-3769 • Page 1 of 1 9/23/2005 ?. ......... ..... _.... ,..,..... .. ...... _ EXIST. 2' CONC CURB 862 BAYWAY Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Patricia Stough [parch@gate.net] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 11:42 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: [BULK] bayway cont.... Importance: Low Patti Patti the Architect, Inc 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, F134698 (727)733-3769 9/23/2005 BALCONY UNIT B UNIT B (2) STORY __, (2) STORY 'ENTHOUii PENTHOUSE ,. ? ? Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Patricia Stough [parch@gate.net] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 11:43 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: [BULK] bayway loft Importance: Low Patti Patti the Architect, Inc 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, 17134698 (727)733-3769 9/23/2005 r ? r 5 B UNIT B LOFT AREA f? co F ,? B N UNIT B LOFT AREA 0 -0- .? e . 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Patricia Stough [parch@gate.net] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 11:40 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: [BULK] Importance: Low Patti Patti the Architect, Inc 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, F134698 (727)733-3769 9/23/2005 - 1' 1%. 0 0 % _ • . Page 1 of I Wells, Wayne From: Patricia Stough [parch@gate.net] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 11:39 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil Subject: 862 Bayway Patti Patti the Architect, Inc 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, F134698 (727)733-3769 9/23/2005 UNIT A 3,667.61 sq ft A/H ENTRY k l Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 7:47 AM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail); Patti Stough (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Blvd. Renee/Patti I have the following concerns regarding the above referenced project that must be resolved Monday morning to stay on course to the October 18, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. My DRC comment was: "The stairwell on the west side shown on the civil site plan and the architectural site plan is not the same size as that shown on the typical 1st to 3rd floor plans. Advise/revise." There is 10 feet from the first (ground) floor to the second floor and 10'-8" from the second to the third floor, or only 8" greater than the first to second floor. There are seven risers to the half floor landing in the stairs from the first to the second floor, yet 10 risers to the half floor landing in the stairs from the second to the third floor. The concern originally raised is that the stairwell depicted on the first floor, if it must grow in length to that depicted for the second to third floor, is that the stairwell will protrude into the handicap access aisle and then not be in compliance with Code requirements (since the minimum number of parking spaces is being provided). Please advise as to whether there is a problem or not. 2. My DRC comment was: "Remove from the 4th Floor plan the roofing pattern from the front balcony. Is this front balcony used by both the penthouse owners??" Patti explained in detail how the front stairs went to the fourth floor and that this was the entry, even though the plans did not show what Patti was speaking of. The revised plans indicate "entry" on this "balcony" that appears shared by both penthouse units, as I questioned before and I still don't see any stairs to this fourth floor in the front as Patti explained at DRC. I need to know how this is working. 3. My DRC comment was: "Is the 6th Floor accessible area to the penthouse units and the widow's walk above also accessible? If so, how?" The response to this DRC comment is that the lighthouse is decorative only and has a service door for maintenance personnel and is not intended to be used as occupied space. I have serious concerns regarding this lighthouse, as I see a spiral stair on the fifth floor (assumed to extend to the lighthouse), which means that it is occupied space, allowing the resident to access the open deck on the lighthouse level. Is this correct? How are you providing Building Code tenant separation between the units in the lighthouse? If the spiral staircase does not go to the lighthouse level, how will the "maintenance personnel" access it? 4. My DRC comment was: "Indicate the location of outdoor. a/c units on the 5th floor plan. How does a repairman access these units (penthouse unit owners must allow repairman to go thru their unit to access the a/c units???)?" First, I find on the floor plans on Sheet A-1 four air condensing units shown, yet there are five dwelling units (?). Are these condensing units only for the penthouse units? Are the condensing units for the second, third and fourth floor next to the stairs on the west side? If so, how does a repairman access these condensing units on the second, third and fourth floors? Second, it still appears to me that the repairman must enter the penthouse unit on the fourth floor, go up the spiral stairs to the fifth floor and outside to the air condensing units to repair them. Is this still correct? I still have serious concerns with the location of the a/c units and this arrangement of repair, which does not appear to work. If one condensing unit must be replaced, how will that occur? Renee/Patti - Since I am trying to set the October 18th CDB agenda, if these concerns cannot be addressed this morning, this case needs to be delayed to the November meeting. Please let me know ASAP. Wayne orthsMe 5"in" s INC. September 8, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Blvd. - NES #536 DRC Response Dear Mr. Wells: CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on September 1, 2005. General Engineering 1. We acknowledge that all sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed and consistent with all Contract Specifications and A.D.A standards. Prior to C.O.: 1. We acknowledge that a condo plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County. Fire 1. We acknowledge that additional Fire Review is forth coming. 2. Lighthouse structure is intended as a decorative element only. The lighting will be internal and ambient, only illuminating the room. The lighthouse structure has a service door but it is not intended to be used as occupied space. The residents of the top floor will have access to the platform area. 3. We acknowledge that an automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump (to be located above the BFE) is required and a 100psi at roof is required. See sheet C3.1. 4. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 is indicated on sheet C3.1. 5. An emergency generator and lighting has been addressed. See architectural plans for details. 6. The fire hydrant for fire fighting use is within 300' of the building as the hose lies on the same side of the street as the building. See sheet C3.1. 7. A new fire riser at rear for dock protection is part of the standpipe system. See sheet C3.1 8. The building meets FDC requirements regarding the location of the building to the hydrant. See sheets C3.1. 9. We acknowledge that the fire flow calculations by a Fire Protection Engineer are required to assure water supply for systems prior to permitting. 10. We acknowledge and will comply with the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004, requiring signage and clearance. See sheet C3.1. 11. We acknowledge and intend to comply to all clearances as prescribed per NFPA-1. See sheet C3.1. 12. Acknowledged, see revision. Y rg i 13. Acknowledged, see revision. 14. Acknowledged, see revision. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRIN6.COM N ESTECH@MI N DSPRI N6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Page 1 of 3 SEA' 0 9 2005 . M Mr. Wayne Wells September 8, 2005 15. The dock is 20' X 20' and will be serviced by a new fire riser installed at the northeast corner of the site. 16. The architect's plans have been revised and the height of the lighthouse structure has been reduced, therefore the building is no longer considered a high rise structure. Landscaping 1. The utilities will be squeezed as close to the building as possible to provide adequate planting and growth area for the landscaping proposed along the east side of the building. 2. The landscaping proposed near the fire riser in the rear of the site meets the Fire Department requirements for the accessible area, see notes on sheet C3.1 and L1.1. 3. The northern edge of pavement and each side of the driveway has been curbed. See sheet C3.1. 4. Landscape note #8, indicating the minimum size of trees per Section 3-1202.B.1 has been revised. Sheet L1.1 for information. Parks and Recreation 1. We acknowledge that a recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to the issuance of building permits or final plats; whichever comes first. Stormwater 1. Drain tiles and swale connecting roof drains to the pond have been added to the site plan. See sheet C3.1. 2. Swale detail has been added for the east side of the property. See sheet C3.1. 3. Underdrain has been added to insure recovery period. See drawdown analysis included in the Stormwater Report. Solid Waste We acknowledge that a permanent placement of recycling carts can not be in visibility triangles, this is a temporary location only. Traffic Engineering 1. We acknowledge that a vertical clear height for a parking garage must be a minimum of 8' 2". 2. Mirrors will be installed to provide visibility for the first parking space inside of the building. Planning 1. A Flexible Development Application has been provided. • Sub criteria 1-6 have been acknowledged. 2. We acknowledge that a Comprehensive Landscape Application is not required and will be removed. 3. Request provided to architect. 4. The columns at the rear of the building have been relocated or removed. An 18 ft setback has been provided from the wall to the rear property line. 5. Architectural plans have been revised. 6. Architectural plans have been revised. 7. Architectural plans have been revised. 8. Architectural plans have been revised. t, ???----------r`' t---, SEP 0 9 2005 __ J Fsvcs Page 2 of 3 Mr. Wayne Wells September 8, 2005 9. Mirrors will be installed to provide visibility for the first parking space inside of the building. 10. Architect has revised plans, chute now within the building envelope. 11. We acknowledge the two spaces per unit preference; however, the spaces provided meet Code requirements. 12. The sidewalk is reduced to four feet. See sheet C2.1. 13. The trash staging area has been reduced as requested. See sheet C2.1. 14. Meters shown above BFE; no platform required. 15. The Site Data Table has been recalculated. See sheet Cl.l. 16. We acknowledge there may be conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report regarding boats and docks. 17. We acknowledge there may be conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report regarding boats and docks. 18. We acknowledge there may be conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report regarding signs. 19. We acknowledge there may be conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report regarding Building Code Chapter 39 pertaining to seawalls. 20. We acknowledge there may be conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report regarding a condominium plat recording. 21. We acknowledge there may be conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report regarding Parks and Recreation fees. 22. We acknowledge there may be conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report regarding Fire Department requirements. 23. Notes have been added regarding utility placement underground. See notes on sheet C3.1. 24. Architectural plans have been revised. 25. Architectural plans have been revised. 26. Architectural plans have been revised. 27. Lighthouse structure is intended as a decorative element only. The lighting will be internal and ambient, only illuminating the room; therefore providing no negative impacts on the surrounding properties. The lighthouse structure has a service door for maintenance personnel and is not intended to be used as occupied space. 28. We acknowledge and the request is revised to include variance to visibility triangles. 29. Acknowledged, all references to six parking spaces have been revised to eight parking spaces. 30. The note has been corrected/revised to state that the existing dock is to remain as a site amenity. 31. The statement regarding parking has been revised within the application narrative. See attached. 32. Civil and architectural plans have been revised to match information. 33. Additional height information has been added to sheet C1. Revisions have been made to the Description of the Request and Response Criteria. 34. The Description of Request has been revised. If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. ely, Renee Ruggiero Project Planner Q 5 2005 t S`icc Page 3 of 3 Northside • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • s,? 40 5M6W 110, ENVIRONMENTAL • GI??j?' TRANSPORTATION • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: September 8, 2005 To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: Regatta Bay -- 862 Bayway Blvd NES Proj# 0536 We Transmit: X Originals X_ Prints X Enclosed Under Separate Cover Addendum Mail UPS Overnight Shop drawings Pick-Up X Hand Delivered Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. c Copies To: FILE By- N. PELZER A.HAINES Renee Ruggiero, ect Plann :? ;?^ t-t f 1- 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 SEP O 9 2005 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRIN6.COM N ESTECH@MI N DS P R I N6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 "' Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 6:24 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: 862 Bayway Blvd Doreen - I am sending you the Final DRC comments from the September 1, 2005, DRC meeting regarding the above case. Fire added the last comment at the meeting and thought you might want this for your response sheet back to us. Wayne t final 9.1.05 dre action agenda... r • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 6:15 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: Draft 9.1.05 DRC comments for 862 Bayway Blvd. I draft 9.1.05 dre action agenda- 1 0 CITY OF CLIO.RWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM August 05, 2005 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, Fl 33755 RE: FLD2005-07080 -- 862 BAYWAY BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07080. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on September 01, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - F'LD2005-07080 - 862 BAYWAY BLVD Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 2:49 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: Complete Letter for FLD2005-07080, 862 Bayway Blvd. Doreen - Attached is the Letter of Completeness for the above project Wayne I t letter of )mpleteness 8.5.05.. Northside i CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • 5"'es" 'SmAc a INC. ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINA L LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: July 29, 2005 To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 JUL 2 q 2005 Clearwater, FL 33756 l ?j1r°{?i ni JLKIKIlM a A OP ME. Reference: Regatta :Bay / 862 Bayway Blvd. NES Proj# 0536 We Transmit: X Originals Prints X X Enclosed Under Separate Cover _ Addendum Mail UPS Overnight Shop drawings Pick-Up X Hand Delivered Specifications X Applications Floppy Disk 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 - 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ?t 40, - ., Conditions Associated With* The following reviews are still pending: Flood Review Gas Review BCP2008-04399 862 BAYWAY BLVD Dept Name Phone Development Services Michael Lopez The following conditions must be satisfied before the permit can be processed. Building Review Jeff Walker 562-4863 562-4567x2569 Status 05/21/2008 NOTE - Please cloud any/all changes on the plans before returning them for re-review. - A Not Met response letter shall be submitted with all responses for clarification. NOTE -Additional Conditions may be necessary based on the responses to conditions or to new information not on hand at time of review. 05/21/2008 Confirm that a Tie-In Survey (City D&NSD Policy Memo #02.2) will be submitted prior to Not Met commencing any further work after the foundation is complete. This survey will indicate the building's location on the lot. In addition confirm an elevation certificate will be submitted substantiating conformance to FEMA required elevations (i.e. A zones: top of slab, V zones bottom of beam). If applicable, ensure that NGVD to NAVD conversions are correct (i.e. -0.88'). 05/21/2008 Code Section on A0.1 should clearly indicate how a IIB building can be six stories and 66' high. Not Met 05/21/2008 Allowable hieghts and areas from T500? New code is T503 with new values? Please correct. Not Met 05/21/2008 Provide a Life Safety Plan showing occupancy loads, no. of exits, arrangement of exits, maximum Not Met travel distance, common path of travel, egress width requirements, dead end corridor length, etc. 05/21/2008 There appears to be a conflict between the requirements for the garage to be open (406.3.3) and Not Met the max. opening percentages give in T704.8. The code page should clearly indicated how both criteria are met. 05/21/2008 Both the east and west elevations have openings exceeding the max. allowed for those sections Not Met of the wall with FSD less than 10'(25% max opening) and 5'( 15% max openings). Clearly substantiate how the limitations of T704.8 are being met. 05/21/2008 Code page should address S2 to R2 occupany separation requirement and how it is met. Not Met 05/21/2008 Stair 2 does not have a door at the bottom? This makes it an open stair. Open stairs cannot Not Met exceed 4 stories. Please add door. 05/21/2008 Where are the guardrail details for the balconies shown? Not Met 05/21/2008 There is no data provide regarding Fair Housing requirements. Please provide on dwgs; type A or Not Met B bathroom fixture clear floor space requirements for each typical floor plan. Do the same for the kitchen and laundry room. Ensure all doors on the accessible path in the suite are a min of 32" wide. Include info on grab bar blocking (FRT) and electrical recept/switch mounting requirements, etc. 05/21/2008 Energy calcs for this six story building have to be commercial calcs not residential. See Ch. 13 for Not Met definition of commercial/residential. 05/21/2008 Please provide a product approval package for this project, complete with. manufactures Not Met installation instructions, to meet the Florida Product Approval requirements. The covered products are; Windows, Skylights, Exterior doors, Shutters, Exterior Siding and Soffits, Roofing, Structural Components, New and Innovative building envelope products. Print Date: 07/01/2008 CaseConditons Page 1 of 7 • The following reviews are still pending: Flood Review Gas Review BCP2008-04399 862 BAYWAY BLVD Dept Name Phone Development Services Michael Lopez 562-4567x2569 Building Review Jeff Walker 562-4863 (Note - Go to www.boaf.net and click on Product Approval for details) 05/21/2008 Please provide the Threshold Inspector's credentials and inspection plan for the Building Official's Not Met approval. 05/22/2008 All materials under the BFE shall be flood resistant. Review wall schedule for this criteria, i.e. no Not Met wood or gyp board below BFE. 05/22/2008 This is a type IIB building, therefore no wood sheathing/furring, see W-4, and others. Not Met 05/22/2008 The cost of this building is approx 30% lower than industry standard as per ICC? Substantiate Not Met cost of construction. 05/22/2008 A5.11: N & S elevations are reversed. Not Met 05/22/2008 Wood blocking for roof details, etc, need to be FRT, not PT. Not Met 05/22/2008 No plumbing stacks, risers allowed in exit stairs. See stair 2. See plumbing comment. Not Met 05/22/2008 Provide a minimum of two flood vents (1 in2/1ft2) in the recycle room (FEMA). Not Met 05/22/2008 A4.3; Elevation shows windows in all master bedrooms but this in not the case on the floor plans? Not Met 05/22/2008 Substantiate how storage are under stair is adequately separated from exit stair as per 1019.1.5. Not Met C OF O CONDITION - ZONING Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 05/30/2008 Comply with the following condition of approval under FLD2005-07080: Not Met That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 05/30/2008 Comply with the following condition of approval under FLD2005-07080 (any boats presently Not Met moored at this location will be required to be removed unless the boat owner is an owner or lessee of one of the condominiums; documentation required): That boats moored at the existing or future docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; Electrical Review Ralph Rowe 562-4565 06/10/2008 1.Spa tub shown in all master bathrooms,no circuit shown in panels for tub.Please address. Not Met 06/10/2008 2.Islands in kitchens will require an outlet as per. art. 210-52 NEC. Not Met 06/10/2008 3.Page E-6 riser diagram shows 800 amp. Main for meter centers.Service conductor ampicity in Not Met parallel equals 620 amp. based on. copper conductors 75 degree c. colunm table 310-16-C. NEC.Next standard O.C.P.D. 700 amp. per. art. 240-6 NEC. Please address. 06/10/2008 4.All dwelling unit panels shown on page E-6. are missing one conductor as noted on drawings. Not Met Please address. 06/10/2008 5.No G.E.C. shown for fire pump controller per. art. 250 NEC. Please address. Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 07/01/2008 Page 2 of 7 • BCP2008-04399 862 BAYWAY BLVD • The following reviews are still pending: Dept Name Phone Flood Review Gas Review Development Services Michael Lopez 562-4567x2569 Electrical Review Ralph Rowe 562-4565 06/10/2008 6.No laundry loads shown in load calcs. for MDP. Washers and dryers. Not Met 06/10/2008 7.Please provide AIC. ratings for electrical equipment based on Progress Energys transformer Not Met SCA. 06/10/2008 8.Please provide electrical data on fire pump. Not Met 06/10/2008 9.Does this building require a generator, if so please address. Not Met 06/10/2008 10.All dryer circuits shown 3- #8 and 1410 in 1/2". conduit, 1/2" conduit to small per. conduit fill Not Met tabels. 06/10/2008 11.Riser diagram page E-6 shows 2 domestic water pumps from panel HP. HP. panel page E-7 Not Met shows only 1 pump. Please address. 06/10/2008 12.Mechanical drawings show each A/H unit having electric heat strips,no mention of this on Not Met electrical drawings and nothing in dwelling unit panels.Please address. Engineering Review Steve Doherty 562-4773 05/09/2008 The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any/all water meters that Not Met have to be relocated as part of this development, including reclaimed water meters. (No meters shall be located within any impervious areas.) 05/09/2008 Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and Not Met constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 05/09/2008 Sheet C4.2: Typical Fire Hydrant Assembly Setting Cross-section detail #402, pg. 4/4 is dated; Not Met please delete and insert current detail. 05/09/2008 Sheet C3.1: All fire hydrant assemblies installed greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be Not Met constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly (F.H.A.). 05/09/2008 Sheet C3.1: Show on the plan a separate domestic water tap on the existing water main located Not Met in the southerly right-of-way of Bayway Blvd. 05/09/2008 Prior to fire hydrant leads and other unrestricted water lines being brought into service, contractor Not Met shall have conducted a hydrostatic pressure test in accordance with Section IV, paragraph 41.4.1. of the City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards. Testing shall not be done prior to giving City Construction Inspector a minimum 48 hours notice of the time the installation is ready for hydrostatic testing. As-built drawings shall be submitted prior to the hydrostatic test. 05/09/2008 Applicant shall sterilize all unrestricted water lines in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Not Met Specifications and Standards paragraphs 41.5. through 41.5.4. A bacterial test shall be conducted with satisfactory results prior to the water systems being brought into service. All such testing shall be arranged and inspected by the City's Construction Inspector. As-built drawings shall be submitted prior to the bacterial test. 05/09/2008 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built Not Met drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. Print Date: 07/01/2008 CaseConditons Page 3 of 7 • • BCP2008-04399 862 BAYWAY BLVD The following reviews are still pending: Dept Name Flood Review Gas Review Development Services Michael Lopez Engineering Review Steve Doherty 562-4773 05/09/2008 Sheet C4.2: Street Lateral Detail #305 pg. 1/2 is dated. Delete and insert current detail Phone 562-4567x2569 Not Met 05/09/2008 Right-of-Way permit Fees per Ordinance Number 5969-96 (Section 1.3.e). [Public utility Not Met connection - $200.00. (Pavement cut fee per each utility involved and per each connection.)] See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 05/09/2008 The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095), Not Met set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. Fire Review Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3078 04/28/2008 Pages C3.1, L1.2and 1-1.3 have conflicting underground utility entry areas. Change to reflect what Not Met is correct while also answering the issue of the dock protection coming off of the fire pump and not the underground fire supply line. 04/18/2008 Page C3.1 Provide location of 2nd fire hydrant within 300' of building entrance or show an Not Met additional new hydrant located at the west side of building. 04/28/2008 Pages FP-1.1 and FP-1.2 Per NFPA 101,30.3.5.4 In buildings sprinklered in accordance with Not Met NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, closets less than 12 sq ft in area in individual dwelling units shall not be required to be sprinklered. Closets that contain equipment such as washers, dryers, furnaces, or water heaters shall be sprinklered regardless of size. Accordingly add heads in all closets that the footage requirements. and add heads to the dressing areas of the master bedrooms. 04/28/2008 Add Emergency lighting in elevator lobbies on electric plans Not Met 04/28/2008 Per NFPA 101 for calculating exit requirements Occupant load for living areas is 102 based on Not Met 20,455 SQ Ft and 200 SQ FT per person therefore per nfpa 101,7.2.2.2.1 the minimum width of the stairs is required to be 44". These plans show 36" 04/28/2008 Page C3.1 New fire riser for dock protection must me on a seperate line from the system side of Not Met the fire pump as part of the standpipe system for building as aogreed for DCR approval. It now shows it coming off the fire supply line with a T off to the building. 04/28/2008 Provide alarm notification devices in all sleeping rooms to obtain 75 DB at pillow level. Not Met Landscape Review Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 05/30/2008 Sheet L1.1 - Revise Plant Schedule for the following: Not Met a. CB trees must be 10-foot tall and 2.5-inch at time of planting; b. DL palms must be 10-foot clear trunk at time of planting. Land Resource Review Rick Albee 727-562-4741 04/22/2008 Install silt fence to the manufacture's specifications. Not Met Mechanical Review Ralph Rowe 562-4565 Print Date: 07/01/2008 CaseConditons Page 4 of 7 BCP2008-04399 862 BAYWAY BLVD 0 The following reviews are still pending: Dept Name Phone Flood Review Gas Review Development Services Michael Lopez 562-4567x2569 Mechanical Review Ralph Rowe 562-4565 06/10/2008 1.No outside air shown in any master bedrooms for A/H units per. sec. 403 FL. mech. code 2004. Not Met 06/10/2008 2.Please provide details on venting and compliance with chap. 7 FL. mech. code 2004 with Not Met reguards to fire places. MISC - General Vicki Morahan 562-4750 04/16/2008 NEED COPIES OF CONTRACTOR INFORMATION INCLUDING: STATE LICENSE; PINELLAS Not Met COUNTY CONSTRUCTION LICENSING BOARD; AND LOCAL BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE) FROM ORLANDO 06/12/2008 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PERMIT A DETAIL BREAKDOWN OF PROJECT COST NEEDS TO Not Met BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROJECT DOES NOT MATCH THE APPROVED FLD ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST FOR THE PROJECT. THE $4,000,000.00 DISCREPANCY ON COST NEEDS TO BE ADDRESS BEFORE THE PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. Parks & Recreation Chris Hubbard 06/11/2008 Please verify change in project value from FLD2005-07080 ($6,000,000) to BCP2008-04399 Not Met ($2,000,000). This is only a provisional hold and can be immediately resolved by contacting Christopher Hubbard, Public Art Specialist at (727) 562-4837 to remove the hold. Plumbing Review Jeff Walker 562-4863 05/22/2008 Check to make sure 98" height clear ADA height can be provided, considering slab to slab is 10', Not Met less 8" thickness. 05/22/2008 Cannot take sump to storm or sanitary by City ordinance. 05/22/2008 Ensure each suite's potable water supply can be valved off independently of the suites above and below. 05/22/2008 Ensure that a 1/2" supply line does not feed more than two fixtures as per the PCCLB tech. ammendment. 05/22/2008 Aux drain is smaller than main roof drain? 05/22/2008 Where is P11 fixture shown on the plumbing plans? 05/22/2008 ISO E is vented only by AAV yet there are more than 4 branch intervals? See AAV limitations in FPC 917.3.1 05/22/2008 No plumbing stacks, risers allowed in exit stairs. See stair 2. See building comment. Stormwater Review Phuong Vo 562-4752 Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 04/28/2008 1) Please provide proposed grades for area surrounding the proposed building and provide roof Not Met drain details demonstrating all stormwater flows through treatment pond before discharge. 2) Please show swale details for east side of property. (i.e. swales' cross sections, proposed grades, etc) 3) Provide documentation supporting the permeability rate value, K=0.09'/min in. the draw down Print Date: 07/01/2008 CaseConditons Page 5 of 7 • BCP2008-04399 862 BAYWAY BLVD The following reviews are still pending: Dept Name Phone Flood Review Gas Review Development Services Michael Lopez 562-4567x2569 Stormwater Review Phuong Vo 562-4752 analysis. 4) The weir design in the drainage report shows the top of weir is at 5' and the bottom of weir is at 4.5, but the control structure detail does not reflect this design. 5) Skimmer shall be incoporated in the control structure design and allow 6" between the top of the skimmer and the top of bank for freeboard. 6) Show the underdrain system on the grading plan, including the linear feet, cleanout, and invert elevations. 7) Provide mainenance plan for the stormwater facility. 8) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit (4/28/08, MET) Note: Additional comments maybe forthcoming based on the response to the above conditions Traffic Review Bennett Elbo 562-4775 04/28/2008 Ensure with a note on the civil site plan(s) that the parking garage accommodates h/c van parking Not Met by providing a vertical clear height of 8'2" which includes (entrance, route, parking space and exit) per ADA parking compliance. 04/28/2008 Install ADA compliant truncated dome mats where sidewalks end at the driveway. Not Met 04/28/2008 Provide a stop sign where appropriate compliant with current MUTCD standards. Not Met Zoning Review Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 05/30/2008 Sheet C2.1 - Provide proposed dimensions to the building at the rear (north) and the dimensions Not Met for all projections from the building (distance from the building face). 05/30/2008 Revisions have been made to the plan sheets prior to and since the CDB approval of this project. Not Met Revision dates on the side of the sheets are not indicated. Revise. 05/30/2008 Plans appear to only indicate "recycling bin storage" under the stairwell. Unclear where regular Not Met trash container(s) are located. Please indicate such location. Also, need to comply with following condition of approval by CDB. Need confirmation from Solid Waste that the proposed redesign is acceptable: "That trash and recycling room design, sizes and locations meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of any permits;" 05/30/2008 Sheets C2.1, C3.1, L1.1 and L1.3 - Unclear why what appears to be steps are proposed from the Not Met north edge of the pavement into the bottom of the retention pond. Revise/advise. 05/30/2008 Sheets L1.1 and L1.3 - Underground utilities are different than that indicated on Sheet C3.1. Not Met Revise. 05/30/2008 Sheet C3.1 - CDB approved plans included a "swale section detail" that is missing from this Not Met submission. Provide detail. 05/30/2008 Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 - Need to indicate vertical curbing along the pavement edges on the Not Met north end of the parking area. 05/30/2008 Comply with the following condition of approval under FLD2005-07080: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site and landscape plans be amended to screen parking from view along the east side by a minimum four-foot high solid landscaped fence or wall; Print Date: 07/01/2008 CaseConditons Page 6 of 7 • BCP2008-04399 862 BAYWAY BLVD • The following reviews are still pending: Dept Name Phone Flood Review Gas Review Development Services Michael Lopez 562-4567x2569 Zoning Review Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 05/30/2008 Comply with the following condition of approval under FLD2005-07080 and reflect such on Sheet Not Met C3.1 and electrical sheets: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 05/30/2008 Sheet A2.1 - Building floor area has been expanded on all sides into the required reduced setback Not Met not in conformance with that approved by the CDB. Only the bowed window area in the living room on Living Levels 1-4 and the fireplaces on all living floors are acceptable encroachments per Section 3-908.D. Redesign. 05/30/2008 Building design (including floor area, unit layout and building elevations) is not consistent with that Not Met approved by the CDB and does not comply with the following condition of approval included in the Development Order: "That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;" Redesign. 05/30/2008 Sheet A5.1 - Height from BFE to top of lighthouse roof approved by CDB was 76.75 feet. Plans Not Met indicate same height to be 77.00 feet. Height cannot be increased from that approved by the CDB. 05/30/2008 There are two sheets of Sheet A5.1. First one is the North and South elevations, which should be Not Met renumbered to Sheet A4.1. 05/30/2008 Sheet A5.1 (Wall Section 3) and Sheet A11.1 (Elevator Section 12) - Call out dimension of 9'4" for Not Met "Clr for ADA Parking" is in error, as there are lights, sanitary sewer, drainage pipes and fire sprinkler pipes that will encroach into this 9'-4". Even the note on Sheet P1.1 for the Sanitary Plumbing Plan recognizes a different height dimension. Revise note. 05/30/2008 Sheet FP1.1 - Entrance point for fire protection piping is not consistent with that indicated on Civil Not Met Sheet C3.1. Revise. 05/30/2008 Sheet ES-1 - Transformer location needs to be coordinated and shown on Landscape Plan Sheet Not Met 1-1.1, as it conflicts with the proposed landscaping. Print Date: 07/01/2008 CaseConditons Page 7 of 7 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:02 PM To: Hubbard, Christopher Cc: Garriott,. Kevin Subject: Questions on project value for Regatta Bay Condominiums (BCP2008-04399) Chris - The project value that is entered on the FLD case is an estimate submitted by the applicant. The accuracy of that estimate may be open to debate. However, the project value entered-for the BCP may be a different story. Kevin Garriott would be your better person to ask if the project value submitted for the BCP is valid or not and what it is based upon, or if there are any alternative methods of calculation for project value. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Hubbard, Christopher Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:38 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Questions on project value for Regatta Bay Condominiums (BCP2008-04399) Importance: High Hi Wayne, I was reviewing the records for Regatta Bay after our BPRC meeting yesterday morning. While the BCP2008-04399 lists the project value as $2,000,000, the original FLD2005-07080 case lists the value as $6,000,000. Has the project value changed due to a scope change in the project? I'm just trying to account for the difference of $4,000,000, which puts it under the Public Art threshold. Could you please verify that the $2,000,000 is the correct project value? If so, I'll take the provisional hold off that I placed on the BCP. Thanks! Chris Christopher Hubbard Public Art Specialist Parks & Recreation Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 727.562.4837 (Office) 727.562.4825 (Fax) "Appreciation for the Arts, It Starts in Parks" U Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: 440?r+ DATE: 3 h+log . FAX: 71 30 - 7(m TELEPHONE: f') 1 -5-2-3-3 FROM: Wayne M. Wells TELEPHONE: (727 562-4504 SUBJECT: tl" Z dh5 MESSAGE: x NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 3 § 4-401 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Section 4-401. Purpose and applicability. . This division establishes the approval required to commence development of a use in a zoning district which is identified in that district as requiring a Level Two approval. A Level Two approval is granted by the community develop- ment board, based on a recommendation of the community development coordinator. As with Level One approvals, depending on the nature and character of the use, the application may require a site plan, plat approval, a traffic impact study, and/or a certificate of concurrency capacity, as part of its application for approval. After a Level Two approval is obtained, a building and an occupancy permit are required, as well as any required licenses. Section 4-402. Application. An applicant for a Level Two approval shall submit an application in accordance with the requirements of section 4-202 (A) and (E) to the community development coordinator who shall review the application in accordance with the requirements of section 4-202 (C) and (D). Section 4-403. Staff review, report and rec- ommendation. After the community development coordinator has reviewed the application with the develop- ment review committee in accordance with the provisions of section 4-202 (C) and (D), the coor- dinator shall transmit a written recommendation to the community development board, or the hearing officer, if applicable, with a copy to the applicant, setting forth recommended findings of fact regarding whether the application conforms to the flexibility criteria in the zoning district in which the property is located, proposed conclu- sions of fact and law and recommended conditions concerning the application. Section 4-404. Community development board decision. Upon receipt of the recommendation of the community development coordinator, the commu- nity development board shall review the applica- tion, the recommendation of the community de- velopment coordinator, conduct a quasi-judicial public hearing on the application in accordance with the requirements of section 4-206, shall make findings of fact, and may grant the ap- proval, grant the approval subject to specified conditions, or deny the application for develop- ment approval. Level Two approvals shall not be considered or construed as special exceptions or variances. The burden of proof in a Level Two case shall be upon the applicant to demonstrate to the community development board that all required criteria for approval are met. The review and public hearing shall be held within 33 working days after determination of sufficiency, unless the time frame is extended by mutual consent of the applicant and the city. The community develop- ment board shall render a decision not later than 70 days after the initial hearing unless the time frame is extended by mutual consent of the appli- cant and the city. The community development board shall attach such conditions to the approval which are necessary to ensure compliance with the applicable general and specific flexibility re- quirements and standards set out in Articles 2 and 3. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6998-02, § 4, 7-18-02; Ord. No. 7106-03, § 20, 9-18-03; Ord. No. 7413-05, § 19, 5-5-05) Section 4-405. Effect of a Level Two deci- sion. Approval of a level two approval shall be deemed to authorize only the particular use for which it is issued and shall entitle the recipient to apply for a building permit or any other approval that may be required by this development code, the city or regional, state or federal agencies. Such approval shall be evidenced by a written development order issued by the community development coor- dinator that confirms the community develop- ment board's decision and shall be effective upon the date of the board meeting when the decision was rendered. (Ord. No. 7106-03, § 21, 9-18-03) Section 4-406. Changes to Level Two devel- opment approvals. A. Minor revisions. The community develop- ment coordinator is authorized to allow minor revisions to an approved Level Two approved Supp. No. 12 CD4:20 , , t 1 . 0 0 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND OTHER PROCEDURES after receipt of comments from the development review committee. A minor revision is one which: Does not result in conflicts in on-site circulation and/or negative impacts with ingress/egress. 2. Does not change the use unless such change is of a similar or less intensity, as deter- mined by the community development coordinator. 3. Does not increase the density or intensity of the development 4. Does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area. 5. Does not result in a substantial change to the location of a structure previously ap- proved. 6. Does not result in a substantial modifica- tion or the cancellation of any condition placed upon the application as originally approved. 7. Does not add property to the parcel pro- posed for development. 8. Does not increase the height of the build- ings in a manner that will change the overall height of the project, will not alter the scale of the project, does not exceed the maximum height permitted in by the applicable special area plan and zoning district. 9. Any other minor revision that does not substantially alter the character and de- sign of the project. B. Other revisions. Any other adjustments or changes not specified as "minor" shall be granted only in accordance with the procedures for origi- nal approval. (Ord. No. 7106-03, § 22, 9-18-03; Ord. No. 7631- 06, § 1, 11-2-06) Section 4-407. Expiration of a Level Two ap- proval. Unless otherwise specified in the approval, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of the date of the Level Two approval, and all required certificates of occu- Supp. No. 17 § 4-407 pancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Permitted time frames do not change with succes- sive owners. An extension of time to initiate a building permit may be granted by the commu- nity development coordinator provided it is for a period not to exceed one year, is for the project originally approved and provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The community devel- opment coordinator may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments which would significantly af- fect the project. The community development board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit applica- tion. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The community development board must receive the request for this extension within the one-year period of validity after the original ex- tension approved by the community development coordinator. Good causes may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national econ- omy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. In the event a project is governed by a development agreement, the timeframes estab- lished in the agreement shall supercede these requirements. The community development board may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments which would significantly affect the project. Amend- ments which will require no or minor amend- ments (as provided by section 4-406.A) may be approved. Amendments which will require a ma- jor revision to the subject project shall be required to be approved as part of a new Level Two application. Transfer of development rights are exempt from this provision. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 7106-03, § 23, 9-18-03) CD4:20.1 MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP M Y _ Planner III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Boulevard DATE: March 7, 2007 Attached is information related to the request by Renee Ruggiero of Northside Engineering Services, Inc., on behalf of Regatta Bay of Clearwater LLC, for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 862 Bayway Boulevard. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on April 18, 2008. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted a six-month extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per unit. This project was approved with eight parking spaces for five attached dwelling units, at a parking ratio of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order October 2, 2006 Maps and Photos S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Tending cases!Up for the next CDBWayway 862 Regatta Bay (7) -Approved - CDB 4.17.07 - WWIBayway 862 Time Extension Memorandum for 4.17.07 CDB.doc ?9?i?? EXTEN 10 Fl-j D2005-07080 862 BAYWAY BLVD REGATTA BAY PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 285B ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 07/29/2005 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: !/- / 7 - D 7 CLWCoverSheet 0 0 CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2005 Case Number: FLD2005-07080 Agenda Item: E9 Owner: Hamilton Family Applicant: Regatta Bay of Clearwater, LLC Representative: Mr. Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineerinjg Services, Inc. Address: 862 BaMay Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to nine feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and from 10 feet to eight feet (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 77 feet (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.13. EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District; Residential Facilities High (RFH) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.167 acres; 7,280 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached dwellings (Four units) Proposed Use: Attached'dwellings (Five units - condominium) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Preservation District; Water LAND USES: East: High Density Residential District; Attached dwellings South: High Density Residential District; Attached dwellings West: Tourist District; Attached dwellings Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07080 - Page 1 of 9 CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: With the exception of the Clearwater Yacht Club at 830 Bayway Boulevard and the Shells Restaurant at 551 Gulf Boulevard, the area east of Gulf Boulevard is developed with attached dwellings. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.167 acres is located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 800 feet east of Gulf Boulevard. The site is 60 feet wide and 7,280 square feet in area. The site is currently developed with a two-story residential building with four attached dwellings. Parking for the current development backs into the Bayway Boulevard right- of-way. All existing improvements are proposed to be demolished. The site is located within the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" of Beach by Design, which is a distinctive area of mixed uses including high-rise condominiums, resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach By Design contemplates this District will be an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach. The Shells Restaurant at 551 Gulf Boulevard and the Clearwater Yacht Club at 830 Bayway Boulevard are the only nonresidential uses existing east Gulf Boulevard. The Clearwater Yacht Club was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on May 17, 2005, to be reconstructed with a three story (46.5 feet to mean roof height), 18,500 square foot building with offices, exercise room, restaurant and a parking garage structure, with pavement at a zero-foot front setback and the garage structure at a four-foot front setback (FLD2005-01008). The property directly west at 850 Bayway Boulevard was approved by the CDB on September 21, 2004, to be reconstructed with a mixed-use development of 13 attached dwellings and six hotel rooms/units in a building 49 feet tall with the building at a 20-foot front setback, the pavement at a front setback of 6.03 feet and the building/pavement at a 20-foot side setback to 862 Bayway Boulevard (FLD2004-04026) (Note: A time extension to September 21, 2006, to submit for a building permit was approved by the Community Development Director September 21, 2005). Attached dwellings in a three-story building are located directly east of the subject property. To the south and west of the subject property are four, nine-story residential buildings. Proposal: The proposal is to demolish the existing residential building and site improvements and construct a new residential building with five living floors over ground level parking. The existing residential building is located toward the rear of the property. The site has been designed with the building oriented north/south with all parking located under the building. The existing dock will be retained. The request includes a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet and a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet. In order to redevelop this parcel, it appears that the owner is without options to comply with the minimum lot area and lot width requirements. The property to the east is developed with a large attached dwelling complex, while the property to the west has been approved to be redeveloped on its original property. Unless this Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07080 - Page 2 of 9 • • developer can combine this property with that to the west, redevelopment of this parcel is limited to the existing lot area and lot width. The limited lot width does pose design issues for the site. The dimensional requirements for parking require an east/west dimension of 43 feet minimum. Including the wall and column dimensions with the parking dimensions produces a building that is 45 feet in width, leaving only 15 feet for setbacks. The proposal includes reductions to the side setback requirements to provide a seven-foot setback on the east and an eight-foot setback on the west to the actual building. The requested reductions to the minimum lot width requirement is minimal, in light of the site design where the applicant has been able to provide a majority of site improvements meeting Code requirements. The present lot width of 60 feet, combined with the dimensional requirements for parking, produces a hardship to redevelopment of the site. The reduction in lot width will not result in a building that is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity. The proposal includes reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to nine feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and from 10 feet to eight feet (to pavement), and reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 15 feet (to pavement). With regard to the front setback reduction related to the trash staging area, the building will have refuse and recycling collection rooms on the ground floor within the parking garage. Dumpsters and recycling containers will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site and is common with many newer developments. In contrast, the attached dwelling buildings to the east and south roll their dumpsters into the roadway as the staging area. The reduction to the front setback to nine feet for the building is solely for the stairway to the second floor. The building then steps back to a 12.5-foot setback from the front property line to an additional interior stairwell providing access from the second to fifth floors and open-air front entries/balconies for the dwelling units. Therefore, the actual living area of the units is setback approximately 20 feet from the front property line. The building to the west at 850 Bayway Boulevard was approved at a 20-foot front setback and the building at 706 Bayway Boulevard was approved at an 18-foot front setback. The parking garage structure for the Clearwater Yacht Club at 830 Bayway Boulevard was approved at a four-foot front setback. With regard to the side setback reductions to the building along the east (seven feet) and west (eight feet) sides, as discussed above, the reductions are a function of the lot width and the parking dimensional requirements. The proposal includes a reduction to the west side setback to four feet to provide for a sidewalk from the. stairwell located midway in the building, where the Building Code requires such sidewalk on the outside of the building to the public sidewalk within the Bayway Boulevard right-of-way. This sidewalk does not extend the entire distance along the west side of the building, and therefore provides adequate planting area for landscaping. The proposal also includes a reduction to the rear setback to both the building and to pavement. This proposed rear setback to the building is consistent with setbacks approved by the CDB for properties along Bayway Boulevard (620 Bayway Boulevard [27 feet]; 656 Bayway Boulevard [28 feet]; 674 Bayway Boulevard [30 feet]; 692 Bayway Boulevard [30 feet]; 706 Bayway Boulevard [18 feet]; 830 Bayway Boulevard [18 feet]; and 850 Bayway Boulevard [20 feet]). The proposed rear setback to the building is also consistent with the Building Code setback, requirement of at least 18 Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07080 - Page 3 of 9 0 0 feet from the seawall. The rear setback reduction to pavement is consistent with reductions approved at 706 Bayway Boulevard and 830 Bayway Boulevard. The proposal includes an increase to building height from 35 feet to 77 feet (to top of lighthouse). The building is proposed with one dwelling unit per floor for Floors 2 - 4, with each unit 3,510 square feet of living area. There are two dwellings proposed on Floors 5 and 6, to be constructed townhome-style where each of these units is two-stories in height, with each unit 2,512 square feet of living area. The western penthouse unit includes a spiral stair to a "widow's walk" deck with a "lighthouse." Based on the design of this building and the definition of "building height" in the Code, the height of this building falls into the "other" category where the building height is measured to the highest point of the building (top of the lighthouse). The lighthouse is nonfunctional, where it will be lit internally for aesthetic purposes only. The site is located within the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" of Beach by Design, which is a distinctive area of mixed uses including high-rise condominiums, resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach By Design contemplates this District will be an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach. While adjacent to existing or proposed buildings less than 50 feet in height, the four residential buildings to the south between Bayway and South Gulfview Boulevards east to Gulf Boulevard are each nine stories in height. The proposed height is compatible and consistent with other projects within this "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District." Parking spaces for the current residential building are located on-site, but require vehicles to back into the Bayway Boulevard right-of-way to exit the spaces. The proposal will eliminate all of these parking spaces and will provide eight parking spaces on-site (Code minimum requirement is 1.5 spaces per unit or eight spaces for the five dwellings). Parking will be provided at ground level under the building. The northernmost parking space to the rear of the building is partially located under the building and partially under an overhang roof structure. With the proposed site design eliminating the back out parking which covers much of the front of the property and restricting access to the single two-way driveway, the proposal minimizes traffic congestion. The building design will fully enclose the parking level to screen views of the vehicles from adjacent properties and rights-of-way, except a portion of the east side of the building. Any approval of this request should be conditioned on the installation of a minimum four-foot high landscaped fence or wall to screen the parking area from view from the property to the east. A portion of the building is located within the sight visibility triangles at the driveway. On the east side of the driveway, only a column is located within the visibility triangle, whereas the enclosed stairs and recycling bin room encroaches into the visibility triangle on the west side of the driveway. Due to vehicle turning movements, the issues of visibility at this driveway has been determined to have minimal impacts on vehicular and pedestrian safety. A sidewalk will be constructed in the right-of-way where vehicle pavement currently exists, increasing pedestrian safety. The design locates the trash room in the center of the building between the elevator and the stairwell. Recycling bins have been designed under the front entry stairs, where residents access the bins by "windows" on the inside of the building adjacent to the first parking space. These bins are removed from this room to be placed in the trash staging area via a pedestrian door adjacent to Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07080 - Page 4 of 9 0 • the driveway. The size of the trash room and the design of the recycling bin room will need to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Department. The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. It is noted that the Code does not provide the ability to request a Comprehensive Sign Program for a residential property. Future signage will need to meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign would need to be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and attached dwelling criteria (Section 2-803.13) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. C OMPLIANfF. WITH fiTANDARDS AND CRITERIA- (,qectinnc 2-901.1 and 2-R03)_ STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Five dwelling units X DENSITY (30 dwelling units per acre) (Five dwelling units maximum) IMPERVIOUS 0.66 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (0.95 maximum) LOT AREA (10,000 0.167 acres; 7,280 square feet X* s q. feet minimum) LOT WIDTH (100 South: 60 feet X* feet minimum) FRONT SETBACK South: Nine feet (to building) and zero X* (0-15 feet) feet (to trash staging area) REAR SETBACK North: 18 feet (to building) and 15 feet X* 10-20 feet (to pavement) SIDE SETBACK East: Seven feet (to building) and X* (0-10 feet) eight feet (to pavement) West: Eight feet (to building) and four feet (to sidewalk) HEIGHT (35-100 feet) 77 feet (to top of lighthouse) X* PARKING SPACES Eight spaces (1.5 spaces per unit) X (1.5 spaces per unit - attached dwellings; Eight spaces required) * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07080 - Page 5 of 9 • • COMPLIANCE WITH ATTACHED DWELLING FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2- 803.B): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a X building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not X involve direct access to an arterial street. 3. Height: X a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building. 4. Setbacks: X a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. 5. Off-street parking: X a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07080 - Page 6 of 9 • • COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent tnconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.167 acres is zoned Tourist District and is located within the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is four attached dwellings in a two story building with parking that is located within, and requires vehicles to back into, the Bayway Boulevard right-of- way; 3. The lot area is 7,280 square feet, which does not meet the Code requirement of 10,000 square feet; 3. The lot width is 60 in width, which does not meet the Code requirement of 100 feet; 4. The proposal is for the construction of five attached dwellings; 5. The proposed residential building is 77 feet tall (to top of lighthouse); 6. The front setback of nine feet to building is to a stairwell, where the living area of the dwelling units is at a 20-foot front setback; 7. Front setbacks vary along Bayway Boulevard, with the property to the west approved at a 20-foot front setback to building, whereas the property at 830 Bayway Boulevard was approved at a four-foot front setback to the parking structure; 8. Side setback reductions are a function of the lot width and the dimensions for parking design standards; 9. The proposed height is consistent and compatible with other buildings in close proximity, where nine-story residential buildings are located across the Bayway Boulevard; 10. The proposal will construct parking under the building at the minimum amount required by Code for the proposed number of dwellings; and 11. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07080 - Page 7 of 9 0 0 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.B; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 4. Based on the above findings, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit five attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to nine feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and from 10 feet to eight feet (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 77 feet (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B, for the site at 862 Bayway Boulevard with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That trash and recycling room design, sizes and locations meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site and landscape plans be amended to screen parking from view along the east side by a minimum four-foot high solid landscaped fence or wall; 4. That any future freestanding sign be monument-style, a maximum four feet in height and designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07080 - Page 8 of 9 0 0 right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; That boats moored at the existing or future docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall 6 7 setbacks; 9. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 10. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; and 11. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: L%2 Wayne . Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S:IPlanning DepartmeritlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBWayway 862 Regatta Bay (T) - 10.18.05 CDB - WWIBayway 862 Staff Rcport.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07080 - Page 9 of 9 0 0 Gi ul p6ffY PfS ? 8 < ° pZ ? D ?OD O CdUSBMB BIW ? O WNUVVARD we S FIRST ST m oa ?? OR TRURO ST /^\ °Y O O ? ?qL T so 1 BPo C'K< WATER DR Fffri1 V= BAYS'DE PROJECT SITE C, a4y e ai1,y e e ? s? Aa ss 0 ° 0 Location Map Owner: I Hamilton Family Trust I Case: FLD2005-07080 Site: 862 Bayway Boulevard Property Size (Acres) : 0.167 PIN: 17/29/15/05058/004/0160 Atlas Page: 285B :: Q P 1--Lt- _ I 1 1 t 8?0 m I t-t t_- ? ( IJ I ? _ I t p j I 1 I m N I t- I- b ii l-= 1 874 ` I 895 S t 1 I + -I I I t ( r I y I I I I ? " `t-1 I r ( - _r- t ? I 1 t fl _ tl I I 1 t ?i J _ _ _ I _? ? t-_r' o _ I I -'82Ct t o i v? r I O1 ----Y-------1_I I p oo ? I rl 88 `I ? ? I °m o 1 8 I I \. j It Y J ' OS/R t-_ ? N P 1' I I I t ' I I tl ?? I 551 ! L----ll i I Zoning Map Owner: Hamilton Family Trust Case: FLD2005-07080 Site: 862 Bayway Boulevard Property 0.167 Size(Acres): PIN: 17/29/15/05058/004/0160 Atlas Page: 285B • • 1--L I I r-irl-_IZ' --Attacl??d, ' , ,.Attached ' --?,--? dwellings 1 Clearwatfir '-, I-dwelGgs ch+d ;w 1 Yacht Climb d i gs „ - - S pY BLVD ` - A B gyp.- --L 874 F--------,--1 ?- I Attached I rl -? ---, _ ' I Xttached `1 -------- ; 4wel4hgs _ A tached 1 - ?lwel'' ' dwellings I `I ' 6 I , jl itta ed -------,---- ca l i ? 1 t ngs we L 800 l ?2Q I .1- J It f 1 1 1 r VIEW BLVD ? I to S GULF _; ---- a -? I t he __ U 111 Oa - I r, o CO ; _ - AttaFhop 88 ,. ' - -- dwelkin s Atiu ed I ,, 1 well ngs r1 r I ,1 J 1 ?___ I I 1 -- ? I I I-- ? N Restaurant ?-? r -I ? I I I? II Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner: Hamilton Family Trust Case: FLD2005-07080 Site: 862 Bayway Boulevard Property 0.167 Size (Acres) : PIN: 17/29/15/05058/004/0160 Atlas Page: 285B View looking northeast at attached dwellings to the east of subject property View looking northwest at attached dwellings to the west of subject property Fear tl ?i Vlcw" looking south at attached dwellings to the south of subject property 862 Bayway Blvd FLD2005-07080 PPF'q 1 4!??1' P R I: i_m' MA View looking southwest at attached dwellings to the southwest of subject property _ l %I- Ai View looking northeast at docks at rear of subject property ... .:? ?' fall/ +y ?.etdJt Parks & Recs Condition 08/18/2005 A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to the issuance of Not Met building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. Solid Waste Condition William Buzzell 562-4930 08/26/2005 Permanent placement of recycling carts can not be in visibility triangle. Not Met 09-12-05 Recycling carts still shown in visability triangle Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 08/16/2005 Vertical clear height for parking garage must be at a minimum of 8'2", please acknowledge. Not Met ACKNOWLEDGED 2. First parking space inside building has no way to see incoming traffic. Show by what means visibility will be provided rather than allowing this space to cause driver to back out blind into parking drive aisle. 9/12/05 - MIRROR PROVIDED The above to be addressed prior to CDB. .Conditions Associated With• FLD2005-07080 862 BAYWAY BLVD Debbie Reid 562-4818 General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/23/2005 The stairwell on the west side shown on the civil site plan and the architectural site plan is not the Not Met same size as that shown on the typical 1 st to 3rd floor plans. Advise/revise. 08/23/2005 9/18/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 8/23/05 - WW How many dumpsters will be placed out in the trash staging area at any one time? Based on the number of dwelling units and the current designed size of the trash room, there only appears to be one dumpster. Based on this, it is unclear why the trash staging area must be so large. Reduce the size of the trash staging area in order to provide a greater landscaping area. 08/23/2005 9/18/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 8/23/05 - WW Due to the site being in an AE11 flood zone and FEMA and Electric Code requirements for electric meters having to be above BFE and the need for a platform to be able to read the meters, show the proposed location of the electric meters and any required platforms. 08/23/2005 J Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 08/23/2005 J Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That boats moored at the existing dock, lifts and/or slips be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; Print Date: 10/12/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 2 • FLD2005-07080 862 BAYWAY BLVD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/23/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met J That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building. 08/23/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 08/23/2005 J Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 08/23/2005 J Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 08/23/2005 / Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. 08/23/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. J Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and. number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 08/23/2005 Indicate the location of outdoor a/c units on the 5th floor plan. How does a repairman access Not Met these units (penthouse unit owners must allow repairman to go thru their unit to access the a/c units???)? 08/23/2005 Remove from the 4th Floor plan the roofing pattern from the front balcony. Is this front balcony Not Met used by both the penthouse owners?? 08/23/2005 Is the 6th Floor accessible area to the penthouse units and the widow's walk above also Not Met accessible? If so, how? 08/23/2005 Civil and architectural plans are not consistent with where walls are versus columns on the east Not Met side of the ground floor. Revise either the civil plans or the architectural plans, or both. Also reflect any columns to be shown on the ground floor on the civil plans and the proposed setbacks from the property lines. 08/25/2005 Building height will be measured to the top of the deck where the cupola is. Provide on Sheet C-1 Not Met a distance from BFE to this deck (widow's walk). Also provide the height of the lighthouse cupola from the deck (widow's walk). Revise and also include these heights in the site data on C1.1, the Description of Request in the application and in the responses to criteria. Print Date: 10/12/2005 CaseConditons Page 2 of 2 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:28 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2005-07080 Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 -----Original Message----- From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:21 PM To: Herman, Jason Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2005-07080 zone.doc location.doc FLD Map request existing.doc aerial.doc form.doc Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 9:06 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 862 Bayway Boulevard Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-07080 for the property at 862 Bayway Boulevard. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne FLD Map request form.doc 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 3:39 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Wayne, Engineering has completed review of the resubmittal and updated Permit Plan. Approval conditions: Prior to CO, condo plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County. Prior to CO, comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:09 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the October 18, 2005 CDB Sorry for the late response 1101 Ft Harrison- Conditions met and Permit Plan updated. 1770 Drew St- Conditions met and Permit Plan updated. 1100 Cleveland St- Some conditions met and others modified, Permit Plan updated. 211 Skiff- No Issues. 2430 Gulf to Bay- No Issues. 810 Missouri- No Issues. 107 McMullen- Conditions met and Permit Plan updated. 665 Bay Esplanade- No Issues. 1825 Sunset Pt- No Issues. 862 Bayway- No Issues. -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:36 PM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals for the October 18, 2005 CDB DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 18, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-06053 1101 S Ft Harrison Avenue Cristino's Restaurant Planner Mike R. 2. FLD2005-06054 1770 Drew Street Chainwheel Drive Planner: John S. 3. FLD2005-07067 1100 Cleveland Street Clearwater Center Planner: Robert T. 4. FLD2005-04036 211 Skiff Point Mirabel Pointe Planner: Robert T. 5. FLD2005-07075 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd DC Customs Planner: John S 6. FLD2005-07076 810 Missouri Avenue Renaissance Square Condo's Planner: Wayne W 7. FLD2005-07077 107 Mc Mullen Bth RD Dr Hickey Office Planner: Wayne W 8. FLD2005-07078 665 Bay Esplanade Nepenthe Planner: Robert T 9. FLD2005-07079 1825 Sunset Pt Road Bank & Office Planner Wayne W 10. FLD2005-07080 862 Bayway Blvd Regatta Bay Planner Wayne W I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm tome via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, September 13, 2005. Have a Great Day! Thank you, 1 Sherry Watkins Planning Department • • Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2005-07080 Date Requested: September 23, 2005 Date Requested for (date): October 5, 2005 Maps Requested x? Location Map x? Aerial Map x? Zoning Map x? Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering x? Legal Description x? Survey x? Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: Hamilton Family Trust Case: FLD2005-07080 Site: 862 Bayway Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 0.167 PIN: 17/29/15/05058/004/0160 Atlas Page: 2858 • r1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 10:54 AM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail); Patti Stough (E-mail) Cc: Rickard, Leonard; Glenn, Tom Subject: 862 Bayway Blvd. Renee/Patti - I have had Fire and Solid Waste look at the plans and the following comments are still outstanding: Fire: 1. Trash staging area must be 10' from exit stair. PRIOR TO CDB. 2. An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. to be located above BFE. Emergency lighting should can also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB. 3. Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. must be within 300' of building as hose lays and on same side of street as building This hydrant is in addition to the new one to be used for fire systems. PRIOR TO CDB. Solid Waste: 1. Permanent placement of recycling carts can not be in visibility triangle. 09-12-05 Recycling carts still shown in visibility triangle. With regard to Fire comment #1, it was discussed at DRC to relocate the trash staging to the east side of the driveway. With regard to Solid Waste's comment, Tom Glenn has looked at the plans and the trash room on the first/ground level is too small for one dumpster plus the recycling bins. Inside this trash room, from door to back of wall is only five feet, insufficient for a dumpster. There is no room for the recycling bins. Tom recommended a 10'x10' trash room, or at a barest of minimums an 8'x8' trash room. The recycling bins cannot be stored outside, especially in the staging area in the front setback. Please include these items in your revisions. Wayne ?co (;?; - M (-?) <Z-s? -s c,") C?, ibzc? uI,-) 4_-?) ? u d- ? 276A ? 276B 277A ,,P CITY OF CLEARWATER 00 VICINITY POIEUAS COUNTY FLORIDA . PREPARED BY p? PUBUC WORKS ADMINISTRATION P ENCINEERINC 7i9j? ??\ll? 100 S. Myrlle Ne.. CL-al.. R 11756 rll/? P,; (811)562-4750.For. (811)526-755 ( , r11 hll://www.clearwole-fl.<am/engineer/ I 8 1 1 CLEARWATER POINT 14 Ou ,mm 1J CONDO 3 6-3 11 12 D RN 10 uoe sae blic PWIIC Inimmatlon data la IurnlMeO by lne elly of Clearwater Pubtle works AamFhtra[lon/Englneming, and must be accepted DO 7 9 ?, ?0 n CONDO a7-107 5 6 n l:/ T g 51 and used by the reelplenl with the uhd-t.hdNg that the data reeeked _ ea"ecled fm the purpose of de,eloping o graphic Infrostruciuce mvmtmy As such the Cit of Clearwater PWA/E ^ i Q TY . , y makes no warranties, ell prelwed or Implied, concerning the $ l. e'".?(N ocwrxy. eomplelmesa rellaelOty, or suliability of this data for any other pmt4ular use. F. 0-mo e, the City of Clearrroler ?' py 0? 6t6 C C aw al/oz PWA/E ...m- no liability who lsoever associated with the use Rtir? ?9 =T - ra Y 6 ra ? L b 4 2? m>a,>< or ,aen data. or a P???$ J M ii this Auaa e Is -1 a t l di h CL al V tf1Q p g , o per e c e angm For Llrwmollan about latest an PWA/T se soil a pleo r O p Q C r Wee ,e. ?w re ???,?e?/ is ad _ SN114 2 v N ?' $ 4 KT C 1 gA? yt k ,41 F. v t 3- GQO??p? was. lnAo yzs 2 8 @2 F R/ Tx a O o 100 zoo doo fioa ?' 93ra 7 2 1 " ' O d SCALE: t = 400 ?k a CLEARWA R ` O 131 1-ftrtr' POINT ?. ?r Z LEGEND: g?+ CONDO 5 1 10-21 ' O BLOCK NUMBER In a O 43/01 Co 1234 LOT ADDRESS N - f . / , ----? CITY LIMITS LINE / ? ! SHADED AREA - PROPERTY 4 _J ? / ? .. OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS D.e. lgs-xl / A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX ' CITY OWNED PROPERTY / MDR ZONING DESIGNATION / ZONE LINE / 9 I / '? I / fazes[ oRp l / (? .566 05/e7 /Br e. ? .n I P I REVISED: 03/08/99. - - - - - - - - - ZONING ATLAS NE 1/4 OF SECTION Q 294A ? 295A A 17 - 29 S - 15 E 8 C7 • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:36 PM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals for the October 18, 2005 CDB DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 18, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-06053 1101 S Ft Harrison Avenue Cristino's Restaurant Planner Mike R. 2. FLD2005-06054 1770 Drew Street Chainwheel Drive Planner: John S. 3. FLD2005-07067 1100 Cleveland Street Clearwater Center Planner: Robert T. 4. FLD2005-04036 211 Skiff Point Mirabel Pointe Planner: Robert T. 5. FLD2005-07075 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd DC Customs Planner: John S 6. FLD2005-07076 810 Missouri Avenue Renaissance Square Condo's Planner: Wayne W 7. FLD2005-07077 107 Mc Mullen Bth RD Dr Hickey Office Planner: Wayne W 8. FLD2005-07078 665 Bay Esplanade Nepenthe Planner: Robert T 9. FLD2005-07079 1825 Sunset Pt Road Bank & Office Planner Wayne W 10. FLD2005-07080 862 Bayway Blvd Regatta Bay Planner Wayne W I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, September 13, 2005. Have a Great Day! Thank you, Sherry Watkins Planning Department r 3:20 Pm Case Number: FLD2005-07080 -- 862 BAYWAY BLVD is riewl Owner(s): Robert G Hamilton Tre 4148 Harbor Cir S Largo, Fl 33770 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email i. 1 e Of Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: nestech@mindspring.com Location: 0.167 acre located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 800 feet east of Gulf Boulevard Atlas Page: 285B Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to nine feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 2.3 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 7.5 feet (to building), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building and pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 86 feet and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.13. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, F1 33767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535-2424, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447-0290, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 895 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 530-4517, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-441-8212, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: cpoint7@knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-442-0664, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: clwpt8@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard, Jim Keller Applicant/Rep: Doreen Williams, Renee Ruggiero, Patti Stough, Roland Rogers The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 54 1 , The following to be addressed prior to building permit: • 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Prior to CO: 1. Condo plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: No Issues Fire: 1 . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. 2. What is lighthouse structure to be used as? Will it be accessible to tenants? PRIOR TO CDB 3 . An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB. 4. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB 5 , An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. to be located above BFE. Emergency lighting should can also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB 6. Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. must be within 300' of building as hose lays and on same side of street as building. PRIOR TO CDB 7 . New fire riser at rear for dock protection shall be part of standpipe system. PRIOR TO CDB g , FDC is required to be 15' from building and no more than 40' from hydrant. PRIOR TO CDB 9. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS BY A FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER ARE REQUIRED TO ASSURE WATER SUPPLY FOR SYSTEMS. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. CALCS DUE PRIOR TO PERMIT. 10. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 11 . Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO. CDB. 12. Trash staging area must be 10' from exit stair. PRIOR TO CDB 13. Trash holding area to be 10' from exit door. PRIOR TO CDB 14. Trash chute rooms must not open into rated exit stair. PRIOR TO CDB 15 . Provide dimensions or dock in rear to determine what if any additional fire protection may be needed. PRIOR TO CDB 16. At DRC meeting, after further information was conveyed, this building was detemiined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues - existing dock to be re-used. Legal: 1 . No issues. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 55 Land Resources: • 1 . No Issues. • Landscaping: I . With an east side setback of 7.5 feet proposed and with the utilities proposed on this east side of the building, squeeze the utilities as close to the building in order to provide adequate planting and growth area for the landscaping proposed along this east side of the building. 2 . Ensure the landscaping proposed near the fire riser in the rear of the site meets the Fire Department requirements for accessible area, to avoid landscaping interfering with use of the fire riser (when and if needed). 3 . Curb the northern edge of pavement and each side of the driveway. 4. Sheet L1.1 - Revise "Landscape" Note #8 to indicate minimum size of trees per Section 3-1202.13.1 (put correct sizes in Note #8). Parks and Recreation: I . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to the issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. Stormwater: I . Before Building Permit 1) Please provide grading plan for property surrounding building and provide roof drain details demonstrating all stormwater flows through treatment pond before discharge. 2) Please show swale details for east side of property. 3) Dry ponds are required to draw down in 24 hours or less. Please provide calcs demonstrating pond recovery in 24 hours or less. Solid Waste: I . Permanent placement of recycling carts can not be in visibility triangle. Traffic Engineering: I . Vertical clear height for parking garage must be at a minimum of 8' 2", please acknowledge. 2. First parking space inside building has no way to see incoming traffic. Show by what means visibility will be provided rather than allowing this space to cause driver to back out blind into parking drive aisle. The above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 56 I . A Comprehensive tl Redevelopment Application form has been Ii led, however, based on the request, only a Flexible Development Application form needs to be filed to permit "attached dwellings." Submit revised form. Address the following criteria: 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building; 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; 5. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. 6. The design of all buildings complies?with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 2 . A Comprehensive Landscape Program (CLP) application has been filed, however, there are no landscape provisions needing to be waived or modified. Remove the CLP from the application package. 3. Is there any way the 8.5"xl 1" architectural floor and roof plans can be rather placed on a 24"06" sheet, as it makes review much easier? 4. Based on the civil and architectural plans, there appears to be at least two columns at a rear of the building at a rear setback of 15 feet. Staff will not support any setback to building less than 18 feet. Suggest redesigning the building to eliminate the columns to rather have a cantilevered overhang (with no columns to the ground). 5. Unclear why the 4th floor does not have the required egress stairwell and also unclear how the eastern penthouse on the 4th floor accesses the egress stairwell on the west side. Advise/revise. 6. Unclear how the eastern penthouse on the 4th floor accesses the trash chute. Advise/revise. 7. Unclear where the stairs indicated on the 4th floor on the west side goes to, since the stairs are not also indicated on the 3rd or 5th floors. Advise/revise. 8. The stairwell on the west side shown on the civil site plan and the architectural site plan is not the same size as that shown on the typical 1 st to 3rd floor plans.. Advise/revise. 9. Concerned with first parking space backing out blind into the drive aisle due to the building within the visibility triangles. 10. Trash chute appears as an appendage to the building, with a significant side setback reduction. Staff will not support the 2.3-foot side setback to the trash chute. Suggest incorporating the trash chute into the building envelop of the living area (Note: Penthouse square footages are 2512 sf, whereas Floors 1-3 are 3667 sf, which provides adequate living square footage to incorporate the trash chute). 11. Recommend providing two parking spaces per unit. 12. Sidewalk along the west side is shown at 5.67 feet wide. Staff will not support a sidewalk greater than four feet in width, which would provide for a four-foot landscaped area along that portion of the west side of the building. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 57 13 . How many dumpst•ill be placed out in the trash staging area at any one time? Based on the number of dwelling units and the current designed size of the trash room, there only appears to be one dumpster. Based on this, it is unclear why the trash staging area must be so large. Reduce the size of the trash staging area in order to provide a greater landscaping area. 14. Due to the site being in an AEI I flood zone and FEMA and Electric Code requirements for electric meters having to be above BFE and the need for a platform to be able to read the meters, show the proposed location of the electric meters and any required platforms. 15 . Sheet C1.1 - Site Data table - If the building coverage is 4080 sf and the paved VUA is 450 sf, then the impervious area would seem to be 4530. However, sidewalks, trash staging area and other impervious areas do not appear to be included in the ISR. This site does not have 37.9 percent open space. Recalculate and provide real numbers. 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 17 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That boats moored at the existing dock, lifts and/or slips be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; 18 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building. 19. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 20. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 21 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 22 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. 23 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 24 . Indicate the location of outdoor a/c units on the 5th floor plan. How does a repairman access these units (penthouse unit owners must allow repairman to go thru their unit to access the a/c units???)? 25 . Remove from the 4th Floor plan the roofing pattern from the front balcony. Is this front balcony used by both the penthouse owners?? 26 . Is the 6th Floor accessible area to the penthouse units and the widow's walk above also accessible? If so, how? 27 . Is the lighthouse on top of the structure to be lit or is it solely decorative with no lighting? If to be lit, how will it be maintained and by whom? If to be lit, why and will it produce any negative impacts on surrounding properties? 28 . You have noted within the responses to criteria that the site meets the visibility triangle requirements, yet it doesn't. Revise responses. 29. Revise Comp Infill criteria response #8 from six spaces to eight spaces. 30 . Description of Request: Why is it mentioned that the east side of the site will be "utilized as a site amenity for the use of the unit owners"? Provide information as to what the unit owners will be doing in this small area to make it an "amenity." 31 .. Indicate how the attached dwellings meets the Tourist District criteria of "Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level." Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 58 32 . Civil and architectural plans are not consistent with where walls are versus columns on the east side of the ground floor. Revise either the civil plans or the architectural plans, or both. Also reflect any columns to be shown on the ground floor on the civil plans and the proposed setbacks from the property lines. 33 . Building height will be measured to the top of the deck where the cupola is. Provide on Sheet C-1 a distance from BFE to this deck (widow's walk). Also provide the height of the lighthouse cupola from the deck (widow's walk). Revise and also include these heights in the site data on C 1. 1, the Description of Request in the application and in the responses to criteria. 34 . Revise Description of Request to that indicated above by Staff. Ensure responses to criteria address all portions of the request. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 10/18/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 9/8/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 59 0 PM f-4 Case Number: FLD2005-07080 -- 862 BAYWAY BLVD • 3:20 pm Owner(s): Robert G Hamilton Tre 94. 4148 Harbor Cir S Largo, Fl 33770 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email' Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: nestech@mindspring.com Location: 0.167 acre located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 800 feet east of Gulf Boulevard Atlas Page: 285B Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to nine feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 2.3 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 7.5 feet (to building), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building and pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 86 feet and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535-2424, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447-0290, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 895 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 530-4517, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-441-8212, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: cpoint7@knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-442-0664, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: clwpt8@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard Applicant/Rep: Housh Ghovaee, Doreen Williams, Patti Stough, Roland Rogers The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 50 The following to b0oddressed prior to building permit: 1. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Prior to CO: 1. Condo plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. 2. What is lighthouse structure to be used as? Will it be accessible to tenants? PRIOR TO CDB 3 . An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB. 4. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB 5 . An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. to be located above BFE. Emergency lighting should can also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB 6. Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. must be within 300' of building as hose lays and on same side of street as building. PRIOR TO CDB 7. New fire riser at rear for dock protection shall be part of standpipe system. PRIOR TO CDB g . FDC is required to be 15' from building and no more than 40' from hydrant. PRIOR TO CDB 9. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS BY A FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER ARE REQUIRED TO ASSURE WATER SUPPLY FOR SYSTEMS. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. CALCS DUE PRIOR TO PERMIT. 10. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 11 . Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 12. Trash staging area must be 10' from exit stair. PRIOR TO CDB 13. Trash holding area to be 10' from exit door. PRIOR TO CDB 14. Trash chute rooms must not open into rated exit stair. PRIOR TO CDB 15. Provide dimensions or dock in rear to determine what if any additional fire protection may be needed. PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues - existing dock to be re-used. Legal: 1 No issues. Land Resources: No Issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 51 I . With an east side setback of 7.5 feet proposed and with the utilitiesproposed on this east side of the building, squeeze the utilities as close to the building in order to provide adequate planting and growth area for the landscaping proposed along this east side of the building. 2 . Ensure the landscaping proposed near the fire riser in the rear of the site meets the Fire Department requirements for accessible area, to avoid landscaping interfering with use of the fire riser (when and if needed). 3 . Curb the northern edge of pavement and each side of the driveway. 4. Sheet L1.1 - Revise "Landscape" Note #8 to indicate minimum size of trees per Section 3-1202.13.1 (put correct sizes in Note #8). Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to the issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. Stormwater: 1 . Before Building Permit 1) Please provide grading plan for property surrounding building and provide roof drain details demonstrating all stormwater flows through treatment pond before discharge. 2) Please show swale details for east side of property. 3) Dry ponds are required to draw down in 24 hours or less. Please provide calcs demonstrating pond recovery in 24 hours or less. Solid Waste: 1 . Permanent placement of recycling carts can not be in visibility triangle. Traffic Engineering: I . Vertical clear height for parking garage must be at a minimum of 8' 2", please acknowledge. 2. First parking space inside building has no way to see incoming traffic. Show by what means visibility will be provided rather than allowing this space to cause driver to back out blind into parking drive aisle. The above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 52 A Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application form has been V , however, based on the request, only a Flexible Development Application form needs to be filed to permit "attached dwellings." Submit revised form. Address the following criteria: 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building; 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; 5. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 2 . A Comprehensive Landscape Program (CLP) application has been filed, however, there are no landscape provisions needing to be waived or modified. Remove the CLP from the application package. 3. Is there any way the 8.5"x11" architectural floor and roof plans can be rather placed on a 24"x36" sheet, as it makes review much easier? 4. Based on the civil and architectural plans, there appears to be at least two columns at a rear of the building at a rear setback of 15 feet. Staff will not support any setback to building less than 18 feet. Suggest redesigning the building to eliminate the columns to rather have a cantilevered overhang (with no columns to the ground). 5. Unclear why the 4th floor does not have the required egress stairwell and also unclear how the eastern penthouse on the 4th floor accesses the egress stairwell on the west side. Advise/revise. 6. Unclear how the eastern penthouse on the 4th floor accesses the trash chute. Advise/revise. 7. Unclear where the stairs indicated on the 4th floor on the west side goes to, since the stairs are not also indicated on the 3rd or 5th floors. Advise/revise. 8. The stairwell on the west side shown on the civil site plan and the architectural site plan is not the same size as that shown on the typical 1st to 3rd floor plans. Advise/revise. 9. Concerned with first parking space backing out blind into the drive aisle due to the building within the visibility triangles. 10. Trash chute appears as an appendage to the building, with a significant side setback reduction. Staff will not support the 2.3-foot side setback to the trash chute. Suggest incorporating the trash chute into the building envelop of the living area (Note: Penthouse square footages are 2512 sf, whereas Floors 1-3 are 3667 sf, which provides adequate living square footage to incorporate the trash chute). 11. Recommend providing two parking spaces per unit. 12 . Sidewalk along the west side is shown at 5.67 feet wide. Staff will not support a sidewalk greater than four feet in width, which would provide for a four-foot landscaped area along that portion of the west side of the building. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 53 13 . How many dump Pters will be placed out in the trash staging area at any time? Based on the number of dwelling units and the current designed size of the trash room, there only appears to be one dumpster. Based on this, it is unclear why the trash staging area must be so large. Reduce the size of the trash staging area in order to provide a greater landscaping area. 14. Due to the site being in an AE 11 flood zone and FEMA and Electric Code requirements for electric meters having to be above BFE and the need for a platform to be able to read the meters, show the proposed location of the electric meters and any required platforms. 15 . Sheet C1.1 - Site Data table - If the building coverage is 4080 sf and the paved VUA is 450 sf, then the impervious area would seem to be 4530. However, sidewalks, trash staging area and other impervious areas do not appear to be included in the ISR. This site does not have 37.9 percent open space. Recalculate and provide real numbers. 16 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 17 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That boats moored at the existing dock, lifts and/or slips be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; 18 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building. 19. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 20. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 21 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 22 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. 23 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 24 . Indicate the location of outdoor a/c units on the 5th floor plan. How does a repairman access these units (penthouse unit owners must allow repairman to go thru their unit to access the a/c units???)? 25 . Remove from the 4th Floor plan the roofing pattern from the front balcony. Is this front balcony used by both the penthouse owners?? 26. Is the 6th Floor accessible area to the penthouse units and the widow's walk above also accessible? If so, how? 27 . Is the lighthouse on top of the structure to be lit or is it solely decorative with no lighting? If to be lit, how will it be maintained and by whom? If to be lit., why and will it produce any negative impacts on surrounding properties? 28 . You have noted within the responses to criteria that the site meets the visibility triangle requirements, yet it doesn't. Revise responses. 29. Revise Comp Infill criteria response #8 from six spaces to eight spaces. 30. Description of Request: Why is it mentioned that the east side of the site will be "utilized as a site amenity for the use of the unit owners"? Provide information as to what the unit owners will be doing in this small area to make it an "amenity." 31 . Indicate how the attached dwellings meets the Tourist District criteria of "Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level." Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 54 32 . Civil and architectural plans are not consistent with where walls are versus columns on the east side of the ground floor. Revise either the civil plans or the architectural plans, or both. Also reflect any columns to be shown on the ground floor on the civil plans and the proposed setbacks from the property lines. 33 . Building height will be measured to the top of the deck where the cupola is. Provide on Sheet C-1 a distance from BFE to this deck (widow's walk). Also provide the height of the lighthouse cupola from the deck (widow's walk). Revise and also include these heights in the site data on C1.1, the Description of Request in the application and in the responses to criteria. 34. Revise Description of Request to that indicated above by Staff. Ensure responses to criteria address all portions of the request. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 10/18/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 9/8/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 55 Division of Corporations Page 1 of 2 1 prat t ? 'r `tluctit, t4tl?r, .? ? tt? <.??rt i t t 0 ;? b+? art ' Florida Limited Liability REGATTA BAY OF CLEARWATER LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 200 BRIGHTWATER DRIVE UNIT 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 US MAILING ADDRESS 200 BRIGHTWATER DRIVE UNIT 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 US Document Number FEI Number L05000044719 NONE State Status FL ACTIVE Total Contribution 0.00 Date Filed 05/05/2005 Effective Date 05/05/2005 Registered Agent Name & Address ROGERS,ROLAND 1? 200 BRIGHTWATER DRIVE UNIT 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 Manager/Member Detail Name & Address Title ROGERS,ROLAND 200 BRIGHTWATER DRIVE UNIT 2 MGRM CLEARWATER FL 33767 US AUGUSTINE, RONALD 200 BRIGHTWATER DRIVE UNIT 2 MGRM CLEARWATER FL 33767 US PATEL, PANJAK 200 BRIGHTWATER DRIVE UNIT 2 MGRM CLEARWATER FL 33767 US http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet. exe?a 1=DETFIL&n 1=LO5000044719&n2=NAMF WD... 8/5/2005 Division of Corporations Page 2 of 2 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date Previous Filing Return to List Next Filing No Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 05/05/2005 -- Florida Limited Liability THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations 'Ingniry f Corporations Help http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&n 1=L05000044719&n2=NAMFWD... 8/5/2005 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 17 29 15 05058 004 0? Page 2 of 5 17 f 29 / 15 / 05058 1 004 / 0100 05-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 07:15:30 Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales HAHILTON FAMILY TRUST OBK: 08026 OPG: 0140 C/O HAHILTON, ROBERT G THE 4148 HARBOR CIR S LARGO FL 33770-4561 EVAC: A EVAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 862 BAYWAY BLVD of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 f 2002 2003 l rom - : sa es 416,400 Sale Date OR Book/Pa ge Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 0 /1,976 4,417/ 4 47 9i,000 (Q) I 1960: Book 055 Pgs 019-020 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 322,300 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 322,300 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 322,300 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: YES Frontage: Bay Clearwater view: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 7,403.04 1) .60 x 120 70.00 7,200.00 S Special Tax 00 2) 0 x 0 00 .00 3) 0 x 0 00 00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 7,403. 04 6) 0 x 0 00 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 7,403. 04 Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 6 UNIT C BLK D, LOT 16 Description L Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/5/2005 Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 17 29 15 05058 004 00 Page 3 of 5 Property_ andLand.:UseCode__descriptions. 17 / 20 / 15 / 05058 / 004 / 0100 :01 05-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 07:15:30 Residential Card 01 of 1 Prop Use: 220 Land Use: 08 Living Units: 4 Imp Type: Hult Res Apt C4 St Prop Address: 862 BAYWAY BLUD Struc-tural E1e!msnts Foundation Continuous Wall Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco/Reclad Roof Frame Gable-Hip Roof Cover B U Tar&6ravel/Othr # Stories 2.0 Floor Finish Crpt/Unyl/SftWd/Terr Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster Quality Average Year Built 1,964 Effective Age 30 Heating Unit/Spc/W1/F1 Furn Cooling None Fixtures 24 Other Depreciation 0 Functional Depreciation 0 Econonomic Depreciation 0 Sub ArqBas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 1,941 7) .00 0 2) Upper Stry Base Area 90 1,941 8) 00 0 3) Open Porch .30 600 9) .00 0 4) 00 0 10) 00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) 00 0 12) 00 0 Rssidf_-ntial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) DOCK 23X22 20.00 506 i0,120 4,050 1,974 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 4,050 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*- I F ?] Ft- I [ i I F q http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/5/2005 Pinellas County Property Appliv r Information: 17 29 15 05058 004 06 HARBOR ? s022 .at a s ` ki, AY l?? 3 L'd D L-- 851 BA YWA,Y BL`JD G I 4?a 5 1 5 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) Page 4 of 5 F- 51 ? P A h",Vf??' r BLVD 50 '41 BLVD A ,, 1? http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/5/2005 Pifl::llas t:.'ou"ITy :Property ,l ppr *,;or hiforniatio t: 17 29 15 (0058 004 01 r, Page 5 of .5 -Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Nformation hup!Qao.copitrcllas,t`1.us4ahinlcgi-sc,r3?o,=l&a-l&b==l&c. l&r=16&s:--4&t3=lc?Yii:-::f}&p.,. 8/5 00 0 0 . CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 18, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (cont'd from 09-20-05) KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 & 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7- 10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 2. Alan Rophie, Ralph Rophie, Cecila Betech, & Cheryl Cohen (Rophie Family Partnership) are requesting Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 sq ft building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly St) setback to pavement from 25 ft to 11.39 ft, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Ave) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Blvd) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 sq ft of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 sq ft of gross floor area) and to permit a 6-ft high non-opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly St and east along Kilmer Ave), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Ave) landscape buffer from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Blvd) landscape buffer from 15 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), 0 0 as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Vehicle Service Major) at 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd, Sec 18-29-16, M&B 13.04. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-07075 3. Liberty Mirabel LLC (Raxit & Punit Shah, and Battle Creek Hospitality Inc) are requesting Flexible Development request to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 47 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 13 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 4.75 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and 10 ft (to pool), and a reduction in the lot width from 150 ft to 142 ft as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Secs 2-404.17 and 2-1602.C and H. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 211 & 221 Skiff Pt, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5-A Lots 33 & 34. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-04036 4. Clearwater Centre LLC (Guy & Susan Bonneville, Sebastian & Elizabeth Dorner, & Anthony Dorner) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for ht (148 ft to roof deck where a maximum of 75 ft would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use (71 attached dwellings and 44,300 sq ft of non-residential floor area), and to increase the building ht an additional 27 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (71 attached dwellings and 44,300 sq ft of non-residential floor area)] at 1100 Cleveland St, Bassadena Blk A, Lots 1-14 incl part of Lot 15, and Bassadena Blk B Lots 9-11, and 14-25. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07067 5. Melodie A Ferguson, Melodie A Ferguson Tre Rem, Robert M Pennock, Robert M Pennock H Tre Rem, and Paul & Tracey Kelley are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 65 ft (to roof deck), with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the north (side) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the south (rear) and east (rear) setbacks from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of See 2-803.C; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07025) of 2 dwelling units from 120 Brightwater Dr under the provisions of Secs 4-1402 and 4-1403. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 665 & 667 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 6 & 7. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner 111. FLD2005-07078 6. Lenny Cristino is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of a restaurant with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 96 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing outdoor seating deck), from 25 ft to 22 ft (to canopy), and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 14.3 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure) and a reduction of parking spaces from 43 spaces to 9 spaces, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.M, and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 9 ft (along S Fort Harrison Ave), and a reduction to the rear (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Restaurant) at 1101 S Fort Harrison Ave, Magnolia Park Blk 39, Lot 1, parts of Lot 2 & Vac Lotus Path Adj on N. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner 111. FLD2005- 06053 • 0 7. Thomas C & Dorothy J Jessup are requesting a Flexible Development approval (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Ave) setback from 25 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 15.5 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew St) setback from 25 ft to 4.2 ft (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Rd) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Ave) from 25 ft to 8.5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 11 ft (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along N Keene Rd) from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Ave) landscape buffer from 10 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew St) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 4.2 ft (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along N Keene Rd) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 9 ft (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Bicycle shop (retail sales and services) with parking] at 1770 Drew St, Woodmere Hts, Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06054 8. Patrick E & Toni V Hickey are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 ft to 63.75 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 16 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.13, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Doctor's office) at 107 McMullen Booth Rd, Sec 16-29-16, M&B 21.05. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07077 9. Two to One LLC (T. Edward Entreken, V.P.) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit the re-establishment of retail sales and services (financial institution) as a primary use within the Office (O) District with a reduction to the side (west) setback from 20 ft to 4.7 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.13, and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4.7 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (north) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (financial institution) and office] at 1825 Sunset Point Rd, Pinellas Groves, Parts of Lots 7 & 8. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07079 • 0 10. Hamilton Family Trust (Regatta Bay of Clearwater, LLC, Roland Rogers) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 5 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 sq ft to 7,280 sq ft, a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 60 ft, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 9 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 8 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 77 ft (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (5 condominiums)] at 862 Bayway Blvd, Bayside Sub No 6, Unit C, Blk D, Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells,_AICP,-Planner III.- FLD2005-07080y] 11. Clearwater Retail Group LTD is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings as part of a mixed use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (east along S Missouri Ave) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Rd) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 9.7 ft (to dumpster enclosure) and an increase to building ht from 25 ft to 52.25 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional 15.5 ft for a decorative clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Rd from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (32 condominiums)] at 810 S Missouri Ave, Clearwater Retail, Lot 10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07076 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that parry status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Parry status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. • Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 10/02/05 FLD2005-07080 = 454 1066283 ONTARIO LTD J & A BLDG SVC LTD 37 SKAGWAY AVE TORONTO ON M1 M 3T9 CANADA * I1 .r 876165 ONTARIO INC 10 PRINCESS ANDREA CT BRAMPTON ON L6T 3Y7 00030 - 00030- CANADA ADAMS, LOUIS N ADAMS, JEAN R 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 115 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2633 AFENDOULIS, CYNTHIA KAY PHANEUF, VICKI H 5361 PRAIRIE HOME DR GRAND RAPIDS MI 49546 - 9015 ALMAR ASSOC PO BOX 413 DENVILLE NJ 07834 - 0413 ANDRETTI, DEE ANN THE ANDRETTI, MARIO THE 457 ROSE INN AVE NAZARETH PA. 18064 - 9234 ARGIRIS, THEODORE ARGIRIS, CATHY 632 LAKE TRAIL DR PALOS PARK IL 60464 - 2543 BAGDON, JOHN BAGDON, COLLEEN M 6742 SOUTH POINTE DR TINLEY PARK IL 60477 - 3995 BASE, KATHERINE BASE, JIM 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 BAYSIDE FAMILY LTD PTNSHP 156-05 29TH AVE FLUSHING NY 11354 - 2405 ADAMS, PAUL ADAMS, CARMELA 129 KETRIDGE ST W BABYLON NY 11704 - 7912 ALBRECHT, CLIFFORD C ALBRECHT, JANET E 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 ALTEMAR, MARCELO ALTEMAR, CIBELE 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 ANGELIS, ELIAS ANGELIS, ANASTASIA 2414 OAK ST BELLMORE NY 11710 - 3111 AVICHOUSER, RICHARD E THE 1587-D MAIN ST DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 4652 BALSAMO, PAUL BALSAMO, MARGARET PMB 157 140 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2216 BATOVSKI, RIZA Y THE 14 115TH ST LEMONT IL 60439 - 8750 BEANE, GLENN L BEANE,JOANN 6 SHERWICK OSWEGO IL 60543 - 9406 w vj ABOVIC, DUBRAVKO 5415 N SHERIDAN RD # 3308 CHICAGO IL 60640 - 1984 ADOLFIE, LAWRENCE D THE ADOLFIE, BARBARA S THE 9415 CROSSPOINTE DR FAIRFAX STATION VA 22039 - 2659 AL-KHUSHMAN, SAMI AL-TITI, ENAS 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 906 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2625 ANDERSON, KAREN L THE 5893 OXBORO AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 - 6151 ANGELOS, NICOLETTE NOSS, HERBERT J JR 18 ARGYLE CT SUMMIT NJ 07901 - 3702 B R V REALTY 120 OCEAN DR SEABROOK NH 03874 - 4736 BANOOB, SAMIR N BANOOB, NARGIS R 4303 CANNES AVE LUTZ FL 33558 - 5334 BAUM, DAVID L BAUM, PAMELA S 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 BELL, JAMES B BELL, MARGARET L 1274 RUFFNER RD NISKAYUNA NY 12309 - 4601 BETZ, FREDERICK W BIKOS, OURANIA N BILBY, FAYE Y BETZ, DONNA M 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 304 PO BOX 275 5384 PIONEER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2627 BARGERSVILLE IN 46106 - 0275 CINCINNATI OH 45247 - 6501 9 0 BILLIA, RODY J BINETTI, GLORIA A TRUST BLACK, LESLIE A BILLIA, GERALDINE A 768 WILSON AVE BLACK, JUDITH W 175 SADDLE DR FORT MYERS FL 33919 - 3239 830 GULFVIEW BLVD # 503 FURLONG PA 18925 - 1017 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 BONDIS, ATHENA BOOMKAMP, HUGO BORDIGNON, PRIMO D THE PO BOX 3906 GOOILANDSEWEG 101 BORDIGNON, MARLENE R THE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8906 1406 LJ BUSSUM 00015 - 741 ADMIRAL CT NETHERLANDS ROUND LAKE PARK IL 60073 - 2786 BOTROS, GEORGE BOURAS, BASILE BOUTROS, MATHEW N BOTROS, ANESTA BOURAS, ANGELEKI BOUTROS, NAGUI N 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 602 2820 23RD AVE 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 ASTORIA NY 11105 - 2708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - BOUTROS, NAGUI N BOVA, RICHARD A SR BOZZO, PHYLLIS BOUTROS, SONIA E BOVA, EILEEN K 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 508 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 702 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 808 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2650 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2650 BRADY, THOMAS J BRAISTED, WILLIAM D BRANIGAN, ELVIRA D BRADY, BARBARA BRAISTED, JOYCEANN M 4300 SW BOATRAMP AVE 7213 CLOISTER RD 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 311 PALM CITY FL 34990 - 5303 TOLEDO OH 43617 - 2213 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2638 BREMER, THOMAS J BRENNAN, BERNARD P THE BREWER, JAMES H SR TRUST 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 211 BRENNAN, MAUREEN I THE 31275 NORTHWESTERN HWY # 233 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3018 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 101 FARMINGTON HILLS MI 48334 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2616 BRIGHT, MAXINE E BROWN, JAMES BRUSILOUSKY, DMITRY 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 207 BROWN, ROBIN BRUSILOUSKY, TSILYA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2635 1630 CREEKVIEW DR 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 208 FLORENCE KY 41042 - 8053 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 BUCCI, THOMAS S BUONO, MARY ANN BURCKHARDT, THOMAS E 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 902 BUONO, EMIDDIO C BURCKHARDT, MARLENE MURPHY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2652 2916 VINSETTA 295 EDLY'S LN ROYAL OAK MI 48073 - 3378 NORTH BRUNSWICK NJ 08902 - 3057 BURGESS, RUTH A BURKHARDT, JOHN K BUTTON, VIRGINIA L THE 1688 GLENVISTA DR 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 504 3350 CAMELS RIDGE LN OAKVILLE ON L6K 6K6 00030 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 COLORADO SPGS CO 80904 - CANADA CALLIS, THEODORE CAMPBELL, JAMES G CANTONE, JOSEPH J CALLIS, CONSTANCE CAMPBELL, BARBARA J CANTONE, GABRIELA M 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 215 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 111 41632 VALOR ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2636 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2630 MURRIETA CA 92562 - CARAGHER, THOMAS M THE CARAGHER, ARLENE R THE 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 704 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 CARUSO, MARY F THE RICHARD, LYNN THE 17 CREELAND AVE MILFORD CT 06460 - 7314 CHASE, PHILIP L DOW-CHASE, DEIRDRE 16 GARDNER ST HINGHAM MA 02043 - 3744 0.1 .1 CARBONARA, DONATO F CARBONARA, ANNA 7608 W AINSLIE ST HARWOOD HEIGHTS IL 60706 - 3347 CATALANOTTO, SHARON E CATALANOTTO, MICHAEL P 4 N 164 CHURCH RD BENSENVILLE IL 60106 - CHBANE, DIMAS DE ANDRADE, ROBERTA 6209 ST IVES BLVD ORLANDO FL 32819 - 4633 u CARTER, JOHN G 8 LINDA CT KIRKWOOD PA 17536 - 9518 CEREN, JEFFREY A CEREN, JACQUELINE B 2607 TURNBERRY RD SAINT CHARLES IL 60174 - 8706 CHIAPPARELLI, PAULINE N 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3024 CLARIZIO, VINCENZO EST CLEARWATER BEACH ASSOCIATION CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS 2193 OAK FOREST LN JAY KEYES COALITION PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 100 DEVON DRIVE DOUG WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT CLEARWATER, FL 33767 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33761 CLEARWATER POINT 1 BEACH HOUSE 16 845 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 CLEARWATER POINT 3 MARINA HOUSE 17 868 BAYWAY BLVD #212 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 CLEARWATER POINT 5 ADMIRAL HOUSE 19 825 S GULFVIEW BLVD #104 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 CLEARWATER POINT 1 CONDO ASSN 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD APT 11 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3029 CLEARWATER POINT 4 CONDO ASSN 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 20 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3031 CLEARWATER POINT 7 INC, HOUSE 851 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 CLEARWATER POINT 2 ASSN INC 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD APT 30 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3030 CLEARWATER POINT 4 ISLAND HOUSE 1 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 YACHT CLEARWATER POINT 8 SHIPMASTER, SAIL 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767 CLEARWATER POINT INC I HMOWNS CLEARWATER POINT INC II 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD HMOWNS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3029 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3029 CLEARWATER POINT INC IV CLEARWATER POINT INC NO 7 HMOWNS HMOW 868 BAYWAY BLVD 855 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2674 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2653 CLEARWATER POINT INC III HMOWN 868 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2674 CLEARWATER POINT NO 7 CONDO A 851 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2651 CLEARWATER POINT NO 8 CONDO CLEARWATER POINT NO 3 CONDO CLEARWATER PT SWIM CLUB INC A AS HM 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD STE 1001 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 21 4175 E BAY DR STE 205 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3028 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2674 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6977 0 CLEARWATER YACHT CLUB INC 830 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2656 COLASANTI, COSIMO COLASANTI, NUNZIA 17 PAMILLE PL TORONTO ON M6M 3A9 CANADA CONDON, RAYMOND CONDON, EILEEN H 4300 MARTHA AVE # 3-D BRONX NY 10470 - 2023 CLEMENT, JAMES M JR 11660 SHIPWATCH DR # 1443 LARGO FL 33774 - COMITTO, ANTHONY COMITTO, MARGARET L 698 HIDDEN LAKE DR 00030- TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 2600 CONNOR, DAVID G THE 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 808 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 CORRAO, ELIZABETH 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 901 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2652 CRISTESCU, GEORGE CRISTESCU, MARIANA 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 DAKHLIAN, MARGUERITE A THE 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2652 DAVIS, CHARLOTTE P 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2622 DE SANTIS, RICHARD J KASCSAK, JOANNE 51 CEDAR DR EAST HAMPTON NY 11937 - 1409 CONDON, VERA H 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 208 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2617 CORCODILOS, JOHN CORCODILOS, ARETE 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 801 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3000 COSTAS, GEORGIA RESIDENCE TRUS 544 W WELLINGTON AVE CHICAGO IL 60657 - 5421 CURRENT OWNER 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 907 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 DALESSANDRO, PATRICK A 610 N MAPLE LN PROSPECT HTS IL 60070 - 1323 DE FILLIPPIS, JARMILLA M 524 CAMPBELL AVE WHEATON IL 60187 - 5537 DECADE PROPERTIES INC N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR #100 WAUKESHA WI 53188 - 1131 CLIFF, BARRY J 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3033 COMNINEL, GEORGE THE COMNINEL, MARILYN A THE 908 HUNTER LN TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 5755 CONDORODIS, A JOHN 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CORNETTA, JOSEPH THE CORNETTA, RITA THE 19 TERRACE CT OLD WESTBURY NY 11568 - CRAINE, WILLIAM D CRAINE, DOROTHY C 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 601 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2621 DA VALLE, ALMA C 2426 N WEST BROOK RD ELMWOOD PARK IL 60707 - 2425 D'AMORE, VINCENZO D'AMORE, ROSA 21W101 BRIARCLIFF RD LOMBARD IL 60148 - 5268 DE HERNANDEZ, CARMEN L THE ALEMAN, GILBERTO O H THE 13032 WEMBLEY CIR CARMEL IN 46033 - 2465 DESPOTAKIS, STAMATIOS DESPOTAKIS, STAMATIA 226-10 59TH AVE BAYSIDE NY 11364 - 2323 DI,GIOVANNA, ANTHONY DI NATALE, JOHN DINGS, GUS G DI GIOVANNA, MARILYN DI NATALE, MARIAN DINGS, MARY 1340 GULF BLVD #9-G 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 205 11031 EARLSGATE LN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2811 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3009 ROCKVILLE MD 20852 - 4559 DORAN, JAMES E DORAN,ROSANN 613 SAYRE DR PRINCETON NJ 08540 - 5834 DUBE'-CRAM, LOUISE 380 CHEMIN ST LOUIS #1807 QUEBEC QC G1S 4M1 00030- CANADA DUWAR, JANIS 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 EURICH, DAVID J THE EURICH, JOAN M THE 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 109 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3016 FABIAN, FRANK B 507 S STATE ST NEWTOWN PA 18940 - 1933 FATHAUER, GEORGE H FATHAUER,JOHANNE W 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3009 FEDELE, JOE 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3015 FILSKOV, JUNE M THE 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2652 FORREST, DEWAYNE FORREST, BARBARA 61259 CASS RD CASSOPOLIS MI 49031 - 9406 , 0'' DOWDEN, JERRY R BRADSHAW, JOHN W 1960 MCCORMICK LN HANOVER PARK IL 60133 - DUBE'-CRAM, LOUISE 855 S BAYWAY BLVD # 802 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - ELSEN, BERNHARD ELSEN, LIESELOTTE AM ZOLLSTOCK 25 D-61352 BAD HOMBURG 1 GERMANY 'RUMMOND, JAMES A DRUMMOND, SANDRA K 625 HIDDEN LN GROSSE POINTE WOODS MI 48236 - 1520 DURKIN, SALLY C 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3009 ESPOSITO, GUY C ESPOSITO, CARMELA 6 N 721 FOLEY LN 00004 ST CHARLES IL 60175 - EVES, WILLIAM T EVES, FRANCES M 273 TERRY RD SMITHTOWN NY 11787 - 5505 FAHEY, MARY J 110 BEACH ST # 214 QUEENS NY 11697 - FAVIA, MICHAEL THE 420 W NORTH AVE ADDISON IL 60101 - 4912 FERRIS, DONALD M FERRIS, ARLENE E 800 GULFVIEW BLVD # 503 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3000 FLEISCHER, GUNTER M FLEISCHER, DENISE J 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3019 FORTMAN, RONALD A FORTMAN, HENRIETTA A 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 114 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2633 EXSYS TOOL INC 11654 CORPORATE LAKE BLVD SAN ANTONIO FL 33576 - FAMA, AUGUST FAMA, TERESA 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - FEAST, LUCILLE E 765 N 34TH ST PADUCAH KY 42001 - 4243 FESTA, PASQUALE FESTA, PAMELA 15 SONDRA DR LARKSVILLE PA 18704 - 1433 FLYNN, WILLIAM F FLYNN, DOLORES R 601 LAKE HINSDALE DR # 209 CLARENDON HLS IL 60527 - 2243 FOSBERG, ROSS M THE 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2619 FOX, RONALD D FRANKIEWICZ, LARRY L FRANKUM, MARK FOX, DORIS A 17680 NORTHVILLE TRL 215 20TH ST NW 10620 BROOKRIDGE DR NORTHVILLE MI 48167 - 3271 LARGO FL 33770 - FRANKFORT IL 60423 - 7910 0 1 , FREDERICO, STANLEY L THE FREDERICO, STANLEY L FREDERICO, THERESA A THE FREDERICO, THERESA A 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 112 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 208 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3016 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3018 FUEHRER, CAROL K 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3033 GAGLIARDI, LORI 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2619 GANS, AUDREY A GANS, OTTO P 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 313 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2639 GAWLIK, DONATA GAWLIK, ANDRZEJ 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 103 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2626 GHALI, HENDRICA N 15 W 752 83RD BURR RIDGE IL 60527 - 5943 GILLEN, FRANCIS X THE GILLEN, MARIE C THE 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3000 GLEASON, DAVID J 238 ST ANDREWS DR FRANKLIN TN 37069 - 7046 GRADEN, JOHN J GRADEN, LYNETTE A 2800 LEPRECHAUN LN PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 2316 GRAPSKI, JEAN 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 301 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - GARRETT, JAMES W GARRETT, OANN W 5215 OAKLEY ST DULUTH MN 55804 - i FREDERICO, STANLEY L FREDERICO, THERESA 865 GULFVIEW BLVD # 104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3015 GAILE, GWEN TRUST GAILE, GWEN THE BOX 384 ALLEN KY 41601 - 0384 GAST, L L GAST, WANDA H 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # G-207 1320 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3030 GENNARI, ELISA 148 PRINCE STREET BOSTON MA 02113 - 1007 GHALY, RAMSIS F 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 905 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2625 GIOTIS, IRENE 227 KNICKERBOCKER AVE STAMFORD CT 06907 - 2009 GHALI, HENDRICA N THE 15 W 752 83RD ST BURR RIDGE IL 60527 - 5943 GIERLASZYNSKI, STANLEY THE GIERLASZYNSKI, FRANCES THE 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 908 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 GIVENS, CHARLENE G 851 S BAYWAY BLVD # 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - GOBELI, ROBERT C GOMEZ, NIURKA GOBELI, JANET L GOMEZ, YURI 855 BAYWAY BLVD #402 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 505 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2654 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2620 GRANNELL, JOHN N GRANZIG, WILLIAM A GRANNELL, SUSAN GRANZIG, PATRICIA A 30 HARDY AVE 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD #906 YATELEY, HAMPSHIRE GU46 6XU 00003 GREAT BRITAIN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3010 GRIFFIN, BRIAN THE 7832 GUNSHOT LN NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34654 - 5402 GRUSS, HENRY P GRUSS, VALERIE A 432 N PROSPECT AVE PARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 3463 GULFVIEW LANDING INC HAGSTROM, ELIN A HAIDARIS, KENNETH K 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 202 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 104 HAIDARIS, ANNA B CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2616 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 302 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - HAMILTON, J T HAMILTON, ROBERT G THE HAMILTON, PHYLLIS M HAMILTON, LOUIS L THE HANDLEY, ROBERT 3 JOHNSON CRESCENT 4148 HARBOR CIR S 3026 W BELMONT SIMCOE ON N3Y 5K9 00030 - LARGO FL 33770 - 4561 CHICAGO IL 60618 - CANADA HARTNETT, GERTRUDE L HICKS, KENNETH P HILL, BURYL P THE HARTNETT, GERALDINE HICKS, SARA T 290 PANORAMA CIR 2350 LINWOOD AVE 742 4TH AVE SEDONA AZ 86336 - 5545 FORT LEE NJ 07024 - 3864 HUNTINGTON WV 25701 - 1424 HODGE, HARRY E THE HORIATES, EVANGELOS HOUSH GHOVAEE HODGE, BARBARA T THE HORIATES, ELEFTHERIA NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #308 2 VIKING RD SERVICES, INC. CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3014 WINCHESTER MA 01890 - 3678 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FL 33755 HUFFMAN, DORIS R HUSNI, FAROUK Y THE HYNES, KENNETH J 868 S BAYWAY BLVD # M-317 HUSNI, ISIS N THE HYNES, JEAN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2674 400 ISLAND WAY # 1007 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 IANNACCI, JOSEPH IAQUINTO, MARY S IBRAHIM, GUIRGUIS A IANNACCI, GRACE KOWECK, PAUL IBRAHIM, ASSINAT A PO BOX 409 518 N SHORE DR 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 801 OLD WESTBURY NY 11568 - ST CLAIR SHOWS MI 48080 - 2814 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 IBRAHIM, RAMSIS G ILACQUA ANTHONY IMRE, ANITA T 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 907 ILACQUA, ANTHONY J JR 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3010 20 HILLTOP ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2654 MILTON MA 02186 - 5805 IMREDY, NIKOLAUS ISKRA, EMIL JACKSON, BRIAN L IMREDY, EDITH ISKRA, CHRISTOPHER E JACKSON, CHRISTOPHER 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 701 1733 CASEY JONES CT PO BOX 3354 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1701 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8354 JANES, DAVID P JANSEN, L R JEFFERY, RICHARD T 1849 CLEARWATER HARBOR DR JANSEN, CAROLYN SUE 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 406 LARGO FL 33770 - 4527 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2619 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - JENKINS, DAVID JOHNSON, CHARLES JOHNSON, JOANNE L JENKINS, SYLVIA JOHNSON, GAIL JOHNSON, KENNETH S THE 845 GULFVIEW BLVD # 205 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 103 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3009 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - JORDAN, ELMER H JUNCAL, JOAQUIM F KARANTINIDIS, MICHAEL JORDAN, GRACE C JUNCAL, ARGENTINA KARANTINIDIS, VAIA PO BOX 395 1905 PILGRIMS WAY # 402 2143 37TH ST JACKSON MI 49204 - 0395 OAKVILLE ON L6M 2X2 00030 - ASTORIA NY 11105 - 1914 CANADA KARKOSKI, JOHN R MUNN, SHELDON W 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3021 KENWORTHY, HELEN C 124 BREWSTER PL CAMBRIDGE ON N3C 3V3 CANADA 0, 1 KATSOURAKIS, ETHEL KATSOURAKIS, ANTHONY N 287 PARK DR CAMPBELL OH 44405 - 1259 KIMBLE, GALEN R KIMBLE, CAROL A 00030- 1134 SHORE DR EDGEWATER MD 21037 - 2520 KLABISCH, SUSAN 11348 CEDARWOOD CT FRANKFORT IL 60423 - 7854 KLOCKOW, R GORDON SEYFRIED-KLOCKOW, NANCY J 491 W WASHINGTON ST RENSSELAER IN 47978 - 2712 KOLNER, BRYANT M KOLNER, BEATRICE J 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 310 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2638 KRISHNA, KUCHIBHOTLA M KRISHNA, NAGA B 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2654 KURKJIAN, GREGORY A JR THE 27W415 WALLACE RD WHEATON IL 60187 - 7889 KYRIAZIS, NICHOLAS KYRIAZIS, CHRISOULA 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 503 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 LA GIOIA, VITO LA GIOIA, GINA 21W310 TEMPLE DR ITASCA IL 60143 - 1924 KLEER-VASSER CORP 1 SE 3RD AVE STE 1210 MIAMI FL 33131 - 1708 KLUCSARITS, CHRISTOPHER 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 KOURTIS, GUS P KOURTIS, MOUSCHOULA 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2618 KRUPA, EDWARD H & LEEARD V REV 13247 LAKE SHORE DR FENTON MI 48430 - 1019 KYRES,ANDRE 212 S COOLIDGE AVE TAMPA FL 33609 - 3828 LA BIANCA, CARMEN 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2634 LAFFERTY, MARK A LAFFERTY, LISA D 2740 WINDSOR HILL DR WINDERMERE FL 32835 - 2673 0 KENTROS, PETER THE 16 UPPER DR HUNTINGTON NY 11743 - 4725 KITTO, RICHARD A KITTO, SANDRA L 533 97TH PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98004 - 4220 KLINGMANN, HORST THE 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD #902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3010 KNAPP, MALCOLM B KNAPP, SHIRLEY J 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2627 KOUTSOUMBARIS, FROSO 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 805 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 KURE, LESLEY G KURE, HELEN J 1037 VICTORIA AVE BERKELEY IL 60163 - 1047 KYRES, PANAIOTA 7070 LEON TREPANIER CATIERVILLE QC H4K 2P4 00030 - CANADA LA GATTUTA, JOSEPH A LA GATTUTA, CLARA A 1 N DEE RD #3B PARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 2869 LAGATTUTA, JAMES E LAGATTUTA, HEATHER M 1025 MOUNTAIN DR DEERFIELD IL 60015 - LAGATTUTA, JOSEPH LAGATTUTA, NICHOLAS J LAKEWOOD PROPERTIES MGMT LAGATTUTA, CLARA LAGATTUTA, MARY B LLC 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 503 324 S LINCOLN AVE 420 KEDZIE ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - PARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 3814 EAST LANSING MI 48823 - LAMB, BENJAMIN LAMBERT, PAUL G LAVELLE, MICHAEL J LAMB, JOAN L LAMBERT, BERTHA J LAVELLE, CHRISTINE 18 CONCORDE PL, STE 528 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 201 55 ROBBINS DR DON MILLS ON M3C 3T9 00030 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2627 E WILLISTON NY 11596 - 2009 CANADA LAVIANO, THOMAS F LEAHEY, JOSEPH E LEHRER, ROBERT A 4 COLONIAL DR 1752 YARDLEY CIR LEHRER, SUSAN A GLEN HEAD NY 11545 - 2800 CENTERVILLE OH 45459 - 6916 868 S BAYWAY BLVD # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - LESNIAK, STANLEY J LEVIT, LOUIS W LIGHT, ROBERT G THE LESNIAK, PATRICIA A LEVIT, ELLEN G 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #307 742 CASTER PIKE 3741 S MISSION HILLS RD # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3014 RIDLEY PARK PA 19078 - NORTHBROOK IL 60062 - 5748 LINFORD, OWEN P LIVINGSTONE, R SCOTT THE LOKSA, EDWARD W LINFORD, SHEILA M LOKSA, BARBARA T 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 204 6465 NAPIER CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3022 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 902 PLYMOUTH MI 48170 - 5094 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2625 MAC DONALD, EDYTHE I MAGGANAS, KOSTAS A MAIETTA FAMILY HOLDINGS 102 E MAIN ST MAGGANAS, PAULINE 16 HILLVIEW AVE WELLAND ON L313 3W6 00030 - 5629 KIPPEN DR MORRIS PLAINS NJ 07950 - 2115 CANADA EAST AMHERST NY 14051 - 1966 MAKRIS, COSTAS MALCOLM, DONALD D MANNING, MICHAEL H MAKRIS, STELLA MALCOLM, DARRAH A MANNING, ANNETTE 2110 DREW ST 104 SPRING.AVE 10080 WELLMAN CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231 GLENEILYN IL 60137 - 5826 STREETSBORO OH 44241 - 1611 MANNION, JOSEPH E MANOLIAS, ANTONIOS MARDER, MURREY MANNINN, ELIZABETH J MANOLIAS, MARIA MARDER, FRANCES C 887 S GULFVIEW BLVD 4644 LAUREL CLUB CIR 711 6TH ST SW CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3004 WEST BLOOMFIELD MI 48323 - 2948 WASHINGTON DC 20024 - 2721 MARSTERS, B A RAND MARTINELLI, PATRICIA MARTINI, JOHN C MARSTERS, DIANE 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 706 MARTINI, ANNE M PO BOX 8755 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3000 PO BOX 53 HUMACAO PR 00792 - 8755 WOBURN MA 01801 - 0053 MARZBAN, HAMID R MC AFOOS, J ALLEN MC ARDLE, RAMONA S THE 307 15TH AVE MC AFOOS, FRANCES W INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 212 800 S GULFVIEW BLVE # 205 2817 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2635 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MC CARTHY, COLEMAN MC CARTHY, COLMAN MC CARTHY, JAMES 403 E 62ND ST .403 E 62ND ST # 11B MC CARTHY, MARY NEW YORK NY 10021 - 7958 NEW YORK NY 10021 - 7938 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3020 MC CARTHY, RICHARD C MC CULLOUGH, SUSAN M MC CUNE, PAUL M MC CARTHY, ANNA 32 TRAILSIDE DR PO BOX 270142 5993 FRESH POND RD WALPOLE MA 02081 - 2324 HARTFORD WI 53027 - 0142 MASPETH NY 11378 - 3437 MC GINTY TRUST MC GINTY-HINSON, MAYE 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2623 MC KENZIE, JOSEPH C THE 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 906 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 MEO, SAM A MEO, JEAN A 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2622 MICHALEK, RUDOLPH L MICHALEK, CHRISTINE C 6875 ANGEBLUFF CIR DALLAS TX 75248 - MILAZZO, SAM MILAZZO, JUDY 1410 MITCHELL TRL ELK GROVE VILLA IL 60007 - 3207 MITEVSKI, BRANKO P MITEVSKI, LJUBICA B 5925 SHORE BLVD S GULFPORT FL 33707 - 5903 MORRISSY, MICHAEL J SMID, GERAD P 40W580 ATCHINSON DR HAMPSHIRE IL 60140 - 9003 MUROV,. VIRGINIA C THE 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 111 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3016 MC GUNIGAL, FRANCINE TRUST MC GUNIGAL, HARRY A THE 825 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3034 MC NULTY, AGNES D 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 210 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2635 MEO, SAM MEO, JEANNE 10 BROMLEY CT SPARTA NJ 07871 - 1535 MIKHAIL, ADEL A MIKHAIL, NARGUIS L 2332W 111TH ST BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 0 MC KENZIE, JACQUELYN L THE 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 906 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 MELLING TOOL CO PO BOX 1188 JACKSON MI 49204 - 1188 MEYER, LUCIANA M 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 608 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3000 MIKOS, GEORGE MIKOS, HELEN 103 CHESTNUT ST W -3933 WHITBY ON L1 N 2Y6 00030 - CANADA MILLER, ARGENTINA PO BOX 682 CANFIELD OH 44406 - 0682 MORANT, JOHNATHEN P O BOX 5603 PARSIPPANY NJ 07054 - 6603 MOUSKY, STAFFORD KING MOUSKY, LAURENCE M 279 E 44TH ST # 10J NEW YORK NY 10017 - 4346 NALLEN, EDWARD NALLEN, PATRICIA 332 E 239TH ST BRONX NY 10470 - 1812 MIRELLI, LORETTA 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 MORBER, ROBERT M MORBER, MARIAN M 71 HAMPTON HILL DR BUFFALO NY 14221 - 5839 MUNSELL, ROBERT F MUNSELL, BARBARA J 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 103 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3032 NEDIC, SVETLANA 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2618 NELSON, FRANCES NETTESTAD, EDWARD B NOEL, LEON J NELSON, MARKS NOEL, SARAH 800 GULFVIEW BLVD # 806 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 10020 NEW PARK RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 TAMPA FL 33626 - 5414 NOVAK, NANCY J THE NOVAK, FRED C THE 5978 PETE'S POINT RD CONOVER WI 54519 - 9242 OMSTEAD, GORDON E OMSTEAD, EDITH C BOX 105 WHEATLEY ON NOP 2P0 00030 - CANADA PALUMBO, CARMELA PALUMBO,PASQUALE 2140 BIT PATH SEAFORD NY 11783 - 2402 PARADISO, PAUL PARADISO, LOUIS 1804 W WOODLAND AVE ADDISON IL 60101 - 1731 PARTSINEVELOS, GEORGE PARTSINEVELOS, PHYLLIS 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 407 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 PATTERSON,LORENA 868 BAYWAY BLVD # M318 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2674 PERCIBALLI, GINO PERCIBALLI, LAURA 12 LONG RIDGE LANE GLEN HEAD NY 11545 - 2506 PIERCE, CHARLES S PIERCE, ANGELINE 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 PONTIUS, K JEFF 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3009 0 O'BRIEN, JOHN K O'BRIEN, ELIZABETH M 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3032 OWNBEY, NELLIE B THE 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3011 PAPOUTSIS, JAMES PAPOUTSIS, GOLDIE 3305 168TH ST FLUSHING NY 11358 - PARKS, SHIRLEY T PARKS, GORDON C 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2652 PATENAUDE, SHEILA R THE 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2631 PEARSON, RICHARD M 54 PLEASANT RIDGE RD BRANTFORD ON N3R 51-5 CANADA 0 OLEJNICZAK, TERESA A 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3000 PADLO, JOSEPH PADLO,CHARLOTTE 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3028 PAPPAS, JOHN C PAPPAS,CONSTANCE 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 707 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3000 PARONE, JOSEPH E PARONE, JULIA E 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 310 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3024 PATTERSON, DONALD B PATTERSON, NANCY J 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 210 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3018 PEDLEY, HEATHER L GARTH, JOANNA R 00030- SYCAMORE HOUSE PARK RD COLTON LEEDS LS159AJ 00009 - UNITED KINGDOM PERRINE, MARTHA J 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2626 PINKEL, ALICE M 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #212 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3013 PONTRELLI, JOANN M THE OS424 CADWELL ELMHURST IL 60126 - PETERSEN, HARRY L PETERSEN, MILDRED H 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2638 POLUTNIK, MICHAEL S POLUTNIK, JOANNE A 5351 RESERVE WAY SHEFFIELD VILLAGE OH 44054 - 2965 POULSEN, RICHARD TRACHUCK,ANTON 7 WAINWRIGHT RD #60 WINCHESTER MA 01890 - 2378 POZNANSKI, WALTER W PRIEST, W JAMES PRINOS, NICHOLAS POZNANSKI, BEATRICE I PRIEST, FRED M PRINOS, MARY J 203 E 72ND ST APT 2A 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 315 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 801 NEW YORK NY 10021 - 4563 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2639 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2623 RAGALIS, JOHN L RAGALIS, AMY D 55 LIBERTY ST # 19A NEW YORK NY 10005 - RAPTOULIS, GEORGE THE RAPTOULIS, IRENE A THE 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2635 REYNOLDS, CHARLES A REYNOLDS, SANDRA E 11 SHINGLE HILL RD WEST HAVEN CT 06516 - 5537 RISTAS, MARK B 5398 DUNNIKER PARK DR DUBLIN OH 43017 - 9606 RONDO,KRYSTYNA SIKORA, ZIBIGNIEW 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 805 CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 2650 RUBIN, SYVIENNE THE 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2621 RUZZO, PATSY A RUZZO, DIANNE M 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2621 SALATA, BARBARA J 110 TIMBER RUN DR CANFIELD OH 44406 - 8630 SALIERNO, GIUSEPPE SALIERNO, ANTONIO 1416 MULBERRY ST SCRANTON PA 18510 - RAMOS, JOSE P DE LURDES, MARIA D 625 THE WEST MALL # 601 ETOBICOKE ON M9C 4W9 00030 - CANADA RAPTOULIS, MARIA THE 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 309 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2638 RICHTER, ANNA 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 RODRIGUES, VIRGILIO RODRIGUES, MARIA 294 RTE 66 COLUMBIA CT 06237 - • RAMQUIST, ROSALIE J 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 312 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3020 REGATTA BAY OF CLEARWATER, LLC ROLAND ROGERS 200 BRIGHTWATERS DRIVE #2 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 RIORDAN, BLANCHE 47 MULBERRY ST RHINEBECK NY 07739 - 1019 ROGERS, JAMES J SR ROGERS, JACQUELYN T 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 ROSENTHAL-PANDEY, JACQUELINE ROSS, CYNTHIA A D 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 906 3995 BOULEVARD DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 PITTSBURGH PA 15217 - 2619 RUBINO, ANNA M RUBINO, FILIPPO 5054 N OLYMPIA CHICAGO IL 60656 - 3319 RUBY, CRISA H TRUST 1755 HENLEY # 2S GLENVIEW IL 60025 - 4352 RYAN, ROBERT J RYAN, SHEILA S 8227 N ELMORE NILES IL 60714 - 2413 SALBERG,ARNOLD SALBERG, GRACE 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 110 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3016 SCANLAN, MARIE C 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2626 SABEL, RUDY V THE SABEL, MAGDALENA THE 1340 GULF BLVD # 12-E CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2809 SALIERNO, ANTONIO SALIERNO, GIUSEPPE 1416 MULBERRY ST SCRANTON PA 18510 - 2292 SCANLON, JAMES M SCANLON, ALICE M 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 904 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2625 SCENIC CYCLING INC SCHLACHTMEYER, SOPHIE SCHLIESINGER, GUNTER R PO BOX 3174 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 208 SCHLIESINGER, LIDIA LISLE IL 60532 - 8174 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2635 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2627 SCHLUTER, ALVIN L REVOCABLE LI • OCHNEIDER, FERDINAND SCHLUTER, ALVIN L THE SCHMALE, LARRY SCHNEIDER, JENNIFER 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 908 1775 E COUNTY RD CROSS PLAINS IN 47017 - AUF DER SCHOTTENWIESE 38 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - A-1160 VIENNA 00024- AUSTRIA SCHOEN, MICHAEL E SCHULZ, LOUIS A SCHOEN, MARY B 800 GUNER,LFVIEW BLVD WILLIAM # 201 SCHULZ, CHRISTIANE E 800 GU 219 FARBER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 1 BROOKWOOD DR WEST BABYLON NY 11704 - 5142 NEWTOWN CT 06470 - 1842 SCICLUNA, JOHN L SEELING, CARA R SEILER, KENNETH SCICLUNA, THERESA C 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 605 731 SNUG ISL 31925 BALMORAL CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1832 LIVONIA MI 48154 - 3181 SGROI, GERALD E SHAW, BRADLEY T JR SHERIDAN, ARTHUR T SGROI, ANN M SHAW, NIZA E SHERIDAN, ANNE L 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 505 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #211 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2626 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3013 SHERRARD, HENRY J THE SHERRIER, ROBERT H SHIRES, PATRICIA W TRUST HODGE, DONNA M THE SHERRIER, MILDRED K 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #204 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 107 G611 LWENDALE DAPHNE 217 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3021 WI 5332 SHUTRUMP, ELIZABETH J SIDERIS, ARISTIDES SIDEROPOULOS, ATHANASIOS 785 DEL NORO DR SIDERIS, KALIOPE SIDEROPOULOS, MARIA SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 805 1550 PANAMA # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2624 BROSSARD QC J4W 2W3 00030 - CANADA SIOUTIS, BILL SMIRLIS, THEODORE SMITH, JUNE B 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD #303 SMIRLIS, PATRICIA 13937 YORK RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 9 HORN LN SPARKS MD 21152 - 9666 LEVITTOWN NY 11756 - 3406 SMITH, REVOCABLE TRUST 11-6-92 SMITH, WILLIAM W SOKOLOWSKI, JACQUELINE G THE SMITH, MARY B THE 218 CHANDLER DR 87 TRENT CT 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 602 WEST CHESTER PA 19380 - 6810 BURR RIDGE IL 60527 - 6476 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2652 SOUPIONIS, COUSTANTINOS SPANDE, GERALD L STANCO, JOSEPH A DAVAROS, DEAN STANCO, JEAN 2343 WHITSTONE EXWY 16430 IRIS 292 VISTA DR WHITESTONE NY 11357 - 3447 LAKEVILLE M MN 55044 - 5833 JERICHO NY 11753 - 2807 STARRETT, SALLY V STEPHANS, SUSAN STEPHENS, WILBURN T 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 102 STEPHANS, DORIS STEPHENS, RUBY G CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3032 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 P O BOX 2303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3009 LAKE OZARK MO 65049 - 2303 STEVENSON,ROBERTJ STORMS,H DUANE STRANGE, BYRON G BRANDAU, MARY S STORMS, ROZANNE R STRANGE, JESSIMAI 221 HILLCREST BLVD 5 S BROOKWOOD DR 3519 NE 158TH PL YPSILANTI MI 48197 - 4336 MONTCLAIR NJ 07042 - 2440 SEATTLE WA 98155 - 6649 STRIGENZ, JUERGEN STROHM, PATRICIA A STRUCK, RAYMOND L 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 207 STROHM, ROBERT A 2 CAMBRIDGE CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2654 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 213 HATTIESBURG MS 39402 - 8876 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2636 STUEBBEN, RONALD C SULLIVAN, ANA M TRUST SULLIVAN, JOSEPH P STUEBBEN, MARGARET J 700 ISLAND WAY # 502 SULLIVAN, JOAN M 30477 PICKFORD ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1836 PO BOX 265 LIVONIA MI 48152 - 3353 SOUTH DENNIS MA 02660 - 0265 SULLIVAN, TIMOTHY D SUTKOWI, RONALD E SUTPHEN, HARRY E SULLIVAN, JUDITH E SUTKOWI, LINDAA SUTPHEN, DORIS M 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 108 9536 WEST HIGGINS LAKE DR 1096 COOLRIDGE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2630 ROSS COMMON MI 48653 - 7173 GRAND BLANC MI 48439 - 4982 TAGLIENTE, THOMAS TAMBACK, EDWARD P JR TANNER, LINDA S PINTO, FRANK G TAMBACK, CAROLE E 25 CAESARS WAY 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 303 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 314 BROADSTONE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3019 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2639 DORSET BH18 9DP 00003 - GREAT BRITAIN TAYLOR, MARY S THE THACHER, MARGIT THEMELIS, JOHN D 7 PETERSON LN THACHER, WYNN THEMELIS, DOMNA PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 1821 9925 UPPER 161ST ST W 3501 MORROW LN LAKEVILLE MN 55044 - 7662 MILFORD MI 48381 - 3360 THOMAS, DAVID J THOMAS, LOWELL R THOMSON, THOMAS TRUST P O BOX 2895 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 903 THOMSON, GRETCHEN AKRON OH 44309 - 2895 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2625 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3023 THORNTON, KEITH THRASH, JACK W TIMBER RUN LTD THRASH, JUNE G 3120 SHADE RD 6715 TIPPECANOE RD BLDG B AKRON OH 44333 - 1838 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 102 CANFIELD OH 44406 - 8180 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2631 TOROSIAN, CHARLES H TRACHUCK, ANTON AFYLLOS, MARIA TEBERIAN, LINDA R TRACHUCK, GRETE 234 HOPE ST 964 WHITEGATE DR 4955 RIVER RD, APT 312 234 HO NORTHVILLE MI 48167 - DELTA BC V4K 4V9 00030 - STANFORD CT 06906 - 1602 CANADA TRUHLAR, RONALD J THE UMECK, WILLIAM R VACCARO, GIUSEPPE TRUHLAR, NANCY L THE UMECK, JUDY K VACCARO, DON 8307 TUDOR CIR 1499 TROTTERS COVE 57 REGENT RD WILLOW SPRINGS IL 60480 - 1123 DUNWOODY GA 30338 - 3851 DOWNSVIEW ON M3K 1 G8 00030- CANADA w 0 VALICENTI, ANTOINETTE VAN SWOL, PATRICIA VELLA, EDWARD L JR 1925 EASTCHESTER RD # 24B 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 702 VELLA, BRENDA S BRONX NY 10461 - 2107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3000 1649 EAST ST PITTSFIELD MA 01201 - 3874 VENABLES, LORETTA S THE VERBIN, MARTIN A VERNOR, RICHARD E THE VERBIN, GERTRUDE 2300 W MANOR DR 3526 SLADE RUN DR BURNSVILLE MN 55337 - 2039 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 804 FALLS CHURCH VA 22042 - 3924 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 VITALE, KATHY VITUCCI, MARY L THE VLAHOS, JAMES P 43070 KEYSTONE 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 508 26 NORTHWOOD RD CANTON MI 48187 - 3400 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2626 NEWINGTON CT 06111 - 3150 VOS, WILMA H THE VOUGIOUKLAKIS, DEMETRIOS P VOUK, ALFRED 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 309 VOUGIOUKLAKIS, C VOUK, MARY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3024 20257 COACHWOOD RD 625 THE WEST MALL 601 RIVERVIEW MI 48192 - 7905 ETOBICOKE ON M9C 4W9 00030 - CANADA WAGAR, NANCY S WALLACE, LORAN E WALSER, CARLA J ZUTTERMISTER, LINDA M WALLACE, GLENDA C 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 403 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 107 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2654 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3033 WARNER, MARK J WATSON, INEZ J WATT, SUSAN A WARNER, ANN C 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 211 1566 SPRING RD 640 STEVENSON RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2635 MISSISSAUGA ON L5J 1 N3 00030 - S ELAIN IL 60177 - CANADA WATTS, CECIL H WECHSLER, ROBERTO WELCH, KARL WATTS, LUCILLE R WECHSLER, ILANA WELCH, RENEE 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 703 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 110 22420 LAW AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2650 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3021 DEARBORN M148124 - 1007 WHELAN, RONALD J WHITE, I M YASOVA, MORRIS M WHELAN, KATHLEEN WHITE, VIRGINIA B YASOVA, VICTORIA 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 403 7943 KEMPER CT 5018 CAMBERLY LN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 PLEASANTON CA 94588 - 3112 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 5113 YESSAIAN, JOYCE TRUST YOUNG, RUPERTO ZAFIRAKIS, GREGORY YESSAIAN, JOYCE THE YOUNG, JANIS M ZAFIRAKIS, KELY D 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 112 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 105 39 NATURE COVE CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WILLIAMSVILLE NY 14221 - 1978 ZARAKAS, PETER ZARLENGA, NICHOLAS R ZIMLIN, YURI M ZARAKAS, MARIE ZIMLIN, OLGA 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 708 1160 LINDENWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 40 CENTER ST TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 7632 CRESSKILL NJ 07626 - 2245 ZUHLKE, ELIZABETH J • ZUHLKE, NORMAN A 86481 525TH AVE BRUNSWICK NE 68720 - 3002 Page 1 of 1 0 41 Wells, Wayne From: Lucille Watts [wattsuplucy@verizon.net] Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 4:01 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Planning Board Meeting October 18,2005 As a full-time resident of Clearwater Point I am requesting a postponement by the board of discussion/action on the property located at 862 Bayway Boulevard on Tuesday October 18,2005. The president of our association and many of are residents are out-of-town and have been unable to review the plans in the allotted time. It would be in the best interest of the owners to have this action tabled until your next meeting in November in order to be fair and to provide an opportunity to become familiar with the plans and to evaluate the consequences of the proposed changes to our neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration .---------------Lucy Watts wattsupluc.y@verzon_._net 10/16/2005 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Rudy Michalek [rmichalekphs@phsinc.kscoxmail.comj Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 4:11 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: michalek@mindspring.com Subject: objection letter to change at 862 Bayway Blvd. To the Community Development Board c/o Wayne Wells, AICP, Planner My name is Rudy Michalek and I own a Unit at 855 Bayway Blvd. I am writing to you to express my objections to the changes being requested for the building at 862 Bayway Blvd. In general, I am objecting to the multiple requests for reductions, deviations and in essence, variances from that which applies to everyone else. If you review all of the changes that have occurred on Bayway Blvd, you will note that the new buildings have encroached unequally upon the roadway. This may lead to increased accidents and traffic issues in the future. The continual redevelopment is leading to a higher density of units on Clearwater Beach, and therefore, more people, more cars, higher needs for utilities services, etc. Has a review study been done or updated to show the impact of the density to available services and traffic movement? Specifically, our objections to the requested changes include: 1.)-The reduction/ elimination of green area. 2.) The reduction in setbacks particularly on the front and sides. 3.) The enclosed stairway on the front of the building minimizing the distance to the street. 4.) The overhangs from the building encroaching on the lot line as they appear on certain but not all,elevation drawings. 5.) The reduction in the minimum lot size. 6.) The building ground plan square footage to the lot square footage, i.e. the ratio of the two. There may be other items including height, but I have not had a chance to review more of the plans. Thank you in advance for your review and discussion of our objections. Sincerely, Rudy and Chris Michalek Rudy Michalek 785-273-3383 - voice 785-273-1814 - fax 214-418-6307- cell 10/12/2005 10/12/2005 14:19 7852731 SENIORADULTMGMT• OA) t? p COset./) t c?.eIL J44,+'. it, PAGE 01/02 ?4b /k c e-.? A - 1, C /C* 7 10/12/2005 14:19 78527316 SENIORADULTMGM: PAGE Page I 02102 of). Rudy Michalek From: "Rudy Michalek" <rmichalekphs@phsinc.kscoxmail.com> TO: <wayne.wells@myclearwater.com' Cc: <michalek@mindspring.com5 sent;, Wednesday, October 12, 2005 3:10 PM Subject: objection letter to charge at 882 Bayway Blvd_ To the Community Development Board c1o Wayne Wells, AICP, Planner My name is Rudy Michalek and I own a Unit at 855 Bayway Blvd. I am writing to you to express my objections to the changes being requested for the building at 662 Sayway Blvd. In general, I am objecting to the multiple requests fer reductions; deviations and in essence, variances from that which applies to everyone else.. If you review all of the changes that have occurred on Bayway Blvd, you will note that the new buildings have encroached unequally upon the roadway. This may lead to increased accidents and traffic issues in the future. The continual redevelopment is leading to a higher density of units on Clearwater Beach, and therefore, more people, more cars, higher needs for utilities services, etc. Has a review study been done or updated to show the impact of the density to available services and traffic movement? Specifically, our objections to the requested changes include: 1.) The reduction/ elimination of green area. 2.) The reduction in setbacks particularly on the front and sides. 3.) The enclosed stairway on the front of the building minimizing the distance to the street. 4.) The overhangs from the building encroaching on the lot line as they appear on certain but not all,elevation drawings. 5.) The reduction in the minimum lot size. 6.) The building ground plan square footage to the lot square footage, i.e. the ratio of the two. There may be other items including height, but l have not had a chance to review more of the plans. Thank you in advance for your review and discussion of our objections. Sincerely, Rudy and Chris Michalek Rudy Michalek 785-273,3383 - voice 785-273-1814 - fax 214-418-8307- cell 10/12/2005 FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: 77 %X-- 7_77 3 a 1}' Phone: 7 SS - 273 - 3333 NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 7 FROM: V--?q, k -Phone: 72-7, J (07. 'S'0 DATE:.- I i b S RE: -D Z005- (? 7 Q$ 0 Oct. 11 2005 04:21PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 917852731814 Oct.11 04:14PM 07102 SND 07 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 21 1 .::..:>:::.>:: . ...:..:.::. ^f f f.:. ... f ':+rr tr f •): •.:.i ?'`•ri.Etr i•//•.••rf •:...... ..... ::....... .:.. ;Lrio: - ----------------------------- i: gill. I'" ? lfF 8f rf # K. zcss.:- :jbod4k - S i.. is ,? ' #fdP.? x92 t n4• y .................................. ................................. .................................. ................................. ................................. ............................... . .................................. ................................ ................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. ............................ _ ................................ ................................ . ............................... . ................................ ............................... .................... ......... Y T' :rr? ax "X ................ wl . U1 0 0 0 N r3 J U) U) m vxn> 7ZFfl n 00 0 r9 cl-1 r? un 0 1 DO 0 0 0 m 0 0 N CL ?p re r? LO 0-'- 1-1 cn +r a 11 I l1w Aa' rx= } t t 2 ' ,.?.....`.... Z ??, _ =mar - 1?1 1 1 W 'WALK C01? ?Q ll C te' 7' , uNE ? O m SWN t li i II II II 11 1 t NO -Nc OWN ova # t i O UM CASEW TrA i ? 1 ? r ?i 1 1 ? ! ' C1 !1 ABLVD (P)(F___,.o - i' E CkEARWATEP T) --T Aafw"r OP60-1?,:; ) PLANNING DEPARTMENT C ITYY. OF C LEAR`XTATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 April 18, 2007 Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Ruggiero: ?4, On April 17, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 862 Bayway Boulevard shall be submitted by April 18, 2008. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S::Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX(FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslBayway 862 Regatta Bay (T) - ApprovedlBayway 862 CDB Time Extension Development Order 4.18.07.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCIUMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRvIATNE ACTION EMPLOYER" CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 19, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 IL •`? Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Development Order - FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Boulevard Dear Mr. Ghovaee: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to nine feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and from 10 feet to eight feet (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 77 feet (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2- 803.13. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment effort s. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That trash and recycling room design, sizes and locations meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site and landscape plans be amended to screen parking from view along the east side by a minimum four-foot high solid landscaped fence or wall; 4. That any future freestanding sign be monument-style, a maximum four feet in height and designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILLJONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSI?N, COUNCILM1IFNIBF.R "EQUAL EMPLOYMENTAND AFFIRMATIVI; ACTION EMPLOYER" October 19, 2005 Ghovaee - Page 2 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 6. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. That boats moored at the existing or future docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; 8. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 9. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 10. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 11. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 12. That a stop bar be provided for exiting vehicles on the driveway before the public sidewalk. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (October 18, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 1, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.mycleanvater.com/ og v/depts/planninn. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael elk, AI Planning Director S.Wlanning DepartmenllC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished Applications0ayway 862 Regatta Bay (T) - Approved0ayway 862 Development Order.doc fi .r 'ell kxl_ 49- I r PLANNING DEPARTMENT William Joe Fisher, Jr., AIA Fisher and Associates, LLC 2315 Belleair Road Clearwater, FL 33764 Re: Development Order - Minor Revision FLD2005-07080 - 862 Bayway Boulevard Dear Mr. Fisher: February 9, 2009 On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 12 conditions the above referenced case, which was for Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,280 square feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to nine feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to building) and from 10 feet to four feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and from 10 feet to eight feet (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 77 feet (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.B. A proposal has been submitted to revise the approved building and site plans for the following: Building Plans: 1. The revised plans correct ingress/egress and on-site circulation conflicts within the previously approved plans. The stairways have been properly calculated, providing the required ingress/egress to each unit per FHA and NFPA requirements. 2. The revised plans eliminate the two townhome units on the upper floors, which were not properly accessible per FHA and NFPA requirements, and replaced with "flat" units on each of the top two floors. Building Elevations: 1. The revised plans correct the opening area limitations requirements per the Florida Building Code 2004 (with 2006 and 2007 revisions), which was incorrectly calculated on the originally approved elevations. 2. The revised plans specify concrete barrel tile above 30 feet above grade, rather than roof shingles, with the required product approvals. 3. The revised plans redesign some roof elements that were not constructable. CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SouTH MYRTLEAvENuE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 "Fniu? F„mn?.n???r .??i. A?no...???a? A.•T?....? F..?,?,...?„u February 9, 2009 Fisher - Page 2 In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed on plans submitted and date stamped July 23, 2008 (Sheets A2.2, A2.3, A4.2 and A4.3) and January 16, 2009 (Sheets C3.1, C4.1, A2.1 and A4.1) are deemed to be a Minor Revision and are APPROVED, subject to the following Minor Revision Conditions of Approval. When resubmitting revised site and building plans under Building Permit #BCP2008-04399, such plans will need to comply with these additional conditions: Minor Revision Conditions of Approval: 1. That all Conditions of Approval imposed originally by the Community Development Board on October 18, 2005, are still in effect and enforceable; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil site and landscape plans be revised accordingly to reflect the revised building design; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site and landscape plans be amended to screen parking from view along the west side by a minimum four-foot high solid landscaped fence or wall; 4. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site and landscape plans be amended to show vertical curbing along the northern pavement edge. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael'De k Al Planning Director S: IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD) Vnactive or Finished ApplicationslBayway 862 Regatta Bay (T) - Approved; VestedlBayway 862 Minor Revisions Development Order 2.9.09.doc