Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2005-07072
ale a_ _ water _ Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $-- CASE DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: _ SOUTH: _ WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 1213012004) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT - AL A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFQRMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME' > 4/ a(e -&(l 1,214w,,4- ADDRESS?d+??( MAILING PHONE NUMBER: 'a 7- OALe_U FAX NUMBER: S?' ?LP ?, C1 _ _ PROPERTY OWNER(S): AGENT MAILING ADDRESS r41?lf/d1/AdW 41-M z? L 3! 76? PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 7.) CELL NUMBER: '-/.1 -7. 701- 01 E-MAIL ADDRESS ????f01Z B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:: (Code} Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject sitel?. L 0" ??/??{e,? ?+ _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 6k, . R • 1 I /o zc. a L -4-, (if not listed here please'note the location of thi document in the submittal PARCEL NUMBER: O Roo D-).3 PARCEL SIZE: "'T!. v7 (acres, square et PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): gff Wz (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) AU" !T__ 2032 -/ i4P:fis!, ?. ?.,+ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):?,?e Z-Z.66 / L Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) L"', (Must include ALL pwners as listed on the deed - provide originilill signatVrefs) on page 6) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater J1 '. r a f ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO y. (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) tr'SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTSf (Coyle Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. ?C ?? y? /L l• ' 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 11 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. r . ? ?R?'?,?? - AUG", 1 1 1035 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of he°parcefi .?gedtfoe developmgnt. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ? 1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. . Ga XV, !A<r 1 1 Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 9 ORIGINAL The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 1? 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 3,V /' f&drt A 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of (Ni UVYC AT] 1 1 2035 Ci & DE'" ci. °:,r i SVCS • ORIG E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with t City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. U/ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all.property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of-all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ?.? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. H"' COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Ac owledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Aj,?L Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) E SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; WITREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Q--GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) 67" SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): f y? ?j Fr' D t L l i D Al[ dimensions; ? - North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _ Location map; R ??? i ?VJ? Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; - Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; - Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; ' ' - All required setbacks; PLAN ci_O,%. -N NING & DE d All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater nPl(;ihlA1 V . . . w . . . . . ... Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. _'?SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. z""1 2 h h yr REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; D R FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; LA ?J ' 2m Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; T _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; PL q',, --°--- Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); C _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); ' - ' _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory, prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; _ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripiines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. lw REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/. X 11) (color rendering if possible); r" IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; g,/REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/Section 3-1806)(,1. dlk,?,elO&W& ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 '/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement, 13 ck owledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): G7W- Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the nd signed, acknowledge that all representations made in this appli do are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and ity representatives to visit and photograph the property auth rizVil des vibe n t his application. of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS -Sworn to and subscribed before a this l- day of A.D. 20 to me and/or by who is personally known has 14 produced as i e tification. Vti NAta'fy public, 1) My commission expires: J!11, < MY COMMISSION DD 155802 y?ov EXPIRES: October 14, 2008 .,nrapY FL No1arY SeMCe & Bonding, Inc. Jevelepment-Corhprehe?sive Infill Application 2005- , r_C_" . t _;'JCS 0 0 ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWA•TER ,Ir AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT y oQ° PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 9ti'ATE???' MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"d FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562=4576 (Name of all property owners) (Address or General Location) 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (Nature of request) 3., That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint 'aiZ- to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affe such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certif t foreg.oing is true and correct. Property Owner G 14?a12,, 4 7"2 -rr/l..?P? sta. LLG STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner -7'4?efore me the undersigned, an officer duly com ssioned by a laws of the State of Florida, on this 4- day of -,j 14t>l, ZW-5 personally appeare? liz - ? who having been first duly sworn deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit t at he/she signed. w Notary Public My Commission Expires: S: application AUa 1 1 L% rJ 4TY tel...''. •..:lt Y.. ; . WILLIAMS N # DD 155802 t ober 14, 2006 toa & BonWng. Inc. INC 'i 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: 0 0 ORIGINAL LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaes with M1011ds ?iMls?isl'! $B1i911C1?„ I10C. to act as an agent for (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documnts related to Securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located on the big: ---;5:. 4zC4EakdzL)' Z142W lylno within (Property Location ' County, 5#mts of Signature of Property Owner Print Name of Property-Owner Address of Property Owner Telephone Number Cityf;atate0p Code State of LDz i Qrl, .., The foregoing Instrument was acknowledge before me this i? to day :aunty of -91 IX 1104 of `r 20.qL/, by -(J-evc - as . G'W' b ALAAN who is personally known tome or who has produced Phyllis M. o.-g ider?tlfcalEon and who di ( d id nt) #aic e an oath. C1 o _? ?Commisaion # DD 027773 9, . 'AF Expires July 6, 2005 %FOF ?l°:•`? Bonded Thm ?z Mantic Bonding Co., Inc, J Notary Public (Signal Commission # J?? Q a -7"7'7 3 (SEAL. ABOVE) „ 2-1I-614 (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) Form # 0098 rev, 90118199 A I?f?r AL 1 27 ?, 0 • ORIGINAL Revised Exhibit "A" to Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project) . Clearwater Grande 655 South Guhview Blvd NES Project #450 Description of Requests: To raze the existing 91 room hotel and restaurant on site and to allow redevelopment of the site through the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment and Termination of Non- Conformity processes. Allowing the construction of a new 68 unit attached dwelling development with reductions to the required rear setback from 20' to 8.8' to the removable paver pool deck, from 20' to 17.6' to the stairs, and from 20' to 18.1' for the building. Also, deviation from the required side yard setback for the walkways from 10' to 6.3' and a request to increase the height of the building from 35' to 99'-4" to top of roof from BFE. Additionally, a very small deviation is being requested for a portion of the building that minimally projects into the visibility triangle located at the west side of the most eastern driveway. Written Submittal Requirements: 1. The property to the east of the subject site is currently developed with a large 12 story condominium; the property to the west of the subject site is developed with a five story hotel. The scale and bulk of both sites appear large and provide little character. The 12 story proposed development offers a design that is in keeping with the mass and scale of the adjoining properties, in addition to providing a structure with desired architectural design and elements. The site currently supports a 91 room hotel and an I- Hop restaurant, the site has been approved through the CDB to support a 91-unit condo hotel through the City's Termination of Non-conformity. The new proposed application is for the conversion of hotel rooms to attached dwelling units as calculated at 91 x .75 = 68. 2. The proposed development, by offering a new improved building and site design will encourage appropriate redevelopment within the area. The proposed high-end luxury attached dwelling unit development will positively affect the value of the surrounding properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons in the neighborhood, actually the new proposed development is a far less intensive then the existing 91 unit hotel and restaurant and in turn will have far less negative affects on the neighboring sites and the community. SVC Y.i.. L?1?UU? ?I f ! U ?! ?? 1 Li!? X11 ORIGINAL 4. This proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion as all required parking will be provided on site and contained within the footprint of the building. Furthermore, the restaurant will no longer be on site and with the conversion from hotel rooms to condominiums the vehicle trip generation will be greatly reduced. 5. The developments surrounding the subject site provide no real identifiable character; the majority of the sites are developed with large older hotels and condominiums. The proposed development will be in keeping with the size and density of the surrounding properties and will provide a Mediterranean design which will promote the desires of the Beach by Design program 6. By design, the proposed development will minimize adverse affects on the adjacent properties by providing an improved site and function. The decrease in units from 91 to 68 will lessen the density and use of the site. Additionally, by providing landscape buffers between adjoining properties, providing more than the required on site parking, and providing for responsible stormwater retention the adverse affects are non- existent. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The redevelopment of this site would be impractical without the minor deviations to setbacks and height as requested herein. The height variance is being requested in large part due to the placement of the parking area on the lower floors of the building as desired by the flexible standard criteria. Additionally, many of the surrounding sites are developed with buildings of similar height and density therefore this proposed development will not provide adverse impact. 2. This proposed project will only work towards enhancing the values of surrounding properties. Per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, the just market value of the existing site is $5,150,000.00. Upon completion of all the proposed improvements the estimated value of the site will be approximately $60,000,000.00. 3. Attached dwelling uses are permitted within the City of Clearwater and especially within the subject Tourist District. 4. This proposed use is compatible with adjacent land uses as there are a mixture of hotel and condominium uses within the near vicinity, accented by retail across the boulevard. The proposed attached dwelling unit use will lend support to the neighborhood businesses through out the year, not just during the season. 5. Suitable sites for development of a project of this grandeur and magnitude are not readily available at this point. This is a prime site for the proposed attached dwelling units 6. The proposed project will be a significant upgrade to not only the site itself but also for the surrounding properties and pedestrians within the right-of-way itself. The desired 10' side setbacks being provided will allow for lush landscape buffers to the 173 Id - R? ? u P 0 Al IS ii24'3 3 PLA r t, a ,? np - " , . T C;Vt: 0 • ORIGINAL adjacent sites where little to none exists now. Additionally, all required parking and retention will be provided on site and a 10' wide sidewalk will be installed within the right-of-way making for safer use by pedestrians. 7. The proposed Classic Italian architecture together with the upgraded landscaping, on-site parking contained within the foot-print of the building and appropriate retention will enhance the community from a visual and functionality standpoint in addition to supporting the Beach by Design desires. 8. The proposed site design requires no variances to the parking requirements and further provides the parking area within the lower floors of the building. The elimination of the I-Hop restaurant together with the change of use from overnight accommodations to attached dwelling units will lessen the vehicular trips for the neighborhood and community. Additionally, the bar will be eliminated from the beach reducing noise and additional traffic. 10. The design of the proposed building and site design complies with the Tourist District design guidelines and the desires of the Beach by Design program with its Classic Italian architecture, enhanced landscape design, buffers, etc. Beach by Design Criteria: I . This proposed project will include the installation of a 10' wide sidewalk along arterial streets as requested the Beach by Design guidelines. 2. The proposed Classic Italian design of the building's architecture will include some varying heights (see elevations), step-backs to avoid a "box-like" appearance, attractive railings and window features as well as multiple areas of fenestration without becoming overly ornate. These features combined together help to eliminate the possibility of a solid massive wall appearance. 3. The landscaping being proposed will help to set Clearwater Beach apart from other communities with the installation of various plant materials including but not limited to Royal Palms, Podocarpus and Jatropha hedges along both sides and out front will feature Phoenix dactylifera and Canary Island Date Palms. The proposed fountain feature out front will be enhanced by landscaping installed in a tiered fashion. 4. Planters and a waterfall feature are being proposed at the front of the building lending to an even more pedestrian friendly atmosphere. RHy* , 0 9 ORIGINAL Exhibit "A" to Section 6-110. Termination of Status as Nonconformity Clearwater Grande 655 South Gulf Boulevard NES Project #450 C. A level two approval shall not be granted to terminate status as a nonconforming use or structure unless, the nonconformity is improved according to the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3- 1202(C ) shall be installed. Response: 1. Perimeter buffers are not required for this project. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(l) ). Response: 2. Parking lot will be improved within code. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. Response: 3. None are proposed. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the regulations of this section. Response: 4. None required and/or requested i, AUG 1 ? 2t.5 3s PtANNINd& Or C.AIY (11F t__ .... . Engelhardt, Hammer & Asociates Clearwater GIN Code Clearwater Grande Code Criteria Analysis Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates has been retained to evaluate the Flexible Analysis " 3 ff%.005 E J Development/Comprehensive Infill Proposal for its compliance with the City of Clearwater Land Development Code, its consistency with Beach by Design standards of development and its compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. The Land Development Code establishes criteria for review of proposals of this level. We have evaluated the proposal relative to those criteria and find the project consistent with the criteria's objectives. General Applicability Criteria 3-913.A 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed project of high-rise condominiums is in keeping with the described character of this district. The subject property is located in the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Designation with primary uses in this category being "high density residential/ overnight accommodation." The site is located in the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. This area is characterized as "mixed-use - high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." Along South Gulfview there are several existing and approved structures of similar height and bulk. The neighbor to the east is the Continental Towers condominiums, a single tower at 94.7' high. Directly north is Captain Bligh's Landing miniature golf course, as well as strip retail, restaurant and office uses. To the west is the mid-rise Econo Lodge Hotel. To the south is the Gulf of Mexico. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adiacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development will further the goals of redevelopment for the area and increase value of the adjacent properties. The current uses on the site are the Quality Hotel, an IHOP restaurant and a large parking lot. This development will add value to the neighborhood by generating year Page 1 of 5 Engelhardt, Hammer & AsOiates Clearwater Gra* Code Criteria Analysis round clientele for adjacent businesses, as well as extending the beach walk with a 10' wide sidewalk and shared pedestrian level features. 3. The proposed development will not adverselv affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development will improve the quality of life for the neighborhood in terms of health and safety. The redevelopment will allow for an upgrade in the structural quality of the existing hotel. Eliminating the beach bar and IHOP Restaurant as well as making all parking internal will provide enhancement to the overall atmosphere of the surrounding area. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposal will reduce vehicle trips through less intense residential use and elimination of the high trip uses of restaurant and bar. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. This proposal is consistent with the neighborhood character. The character of the neighboring community as defined previously is "mixed- use - high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." There are several high rise condominium and overnight accommodation buildings in the nearby vicinity. Recent approvals similar to the proposed development in this district include the Sunspree Project to the east, at 715 South Gulfview Blvd, approved for 149 condominium units at 150' height. The Adam's Mark Project at 430 Gulfview Blvd., approved for multi-use development, consisting of 78 overnight accommodation units and 112 Condominiums with a maximum 149.5' height. The Decade Gulfcoast at 521 South Gulfview Blvd. was approved as a mixed use development including 241 overnight accommodation units, 38 attached dwellings and accessory retail and restaurant at a maximum height of 128'. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adiacent properties. Exciting facade details & high quality materials provide a visually pleasing addition to the neighborhood. Addition of a fountain and waterfall features Page 2 of 5 Engelhardt, Hammer & AOiates Clearwater GraO Code Criteria Analysis and improved landscaping heighten the pedestrian enjoyment of the area. Eliminating the beach bar in favor of the residential trend along this part of the beach ensures a similar pattern of use and time of operation. Comprehensive Infill Criteria 2-803.C 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. The requested deviations to setbacks, with the exception being a minor reduction to building setback in the rear, are not otherwise requested for buildings. The requested reductions are for landscape and boardwalk improvements. The increase in height allows for locating the parking internally to the building footprint. There are no access alternatives to Gulfview Blvd. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The proposed project will add value to the entire surrounding area. It is estimated that the property with be valued as high as $60 million with the improvements proposed versus the current appraised value of $5.15 million. By including improvements to the Beach Walk, as well as plazas and fountains for public enjoyment and use, this development will further the principles set forth in Beach by Design to create value through design continuity and pedestrian movement. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The City of Clearwater Land Use Category and Zoning District encourage these types of high-density residential condominiums in their definitions for the HDR and T districts. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment proiect are compatible with adiacent land uses; The design is representative of the type of uses that are already seen in this district as well as the uses desired in the Beach by Design analysis Page 3of5 Engelhardt, Hammer & AsSates Clearwater Gra* Code Criteria Analysis and the Future Land Use Plan. The project proposal fits well within the mix of uses already established. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal will add value to the vicinity through extending the beach walk, creating off street parking, adding shared ground level improvements and landscaping and removing non-conforming signs, uses and lighting for an improved appearance. 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment proiect creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development of high-end luxury condominiums are a model for redevelopment in the Clearwater Beach community. The adjacent properties, although of similar use, are not of the quality desired by adopted standards for this area. This proposal presents an opportunity to move forward in the preferred form of revitalization. . 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are iustified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole Flexibility in the design is justified by the benefit the new design will bring to the community. Flexibility in height allows for internal parking, and is less imposing through the tiered design and pedestrian level considerations. The setback flexibility allows for boardwalk and beach improvements to continue through the site and significant upgrades in the amount and quality of landscaping. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 94 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. There is more than the required parking by code proposed with the new development. By increasing the number of parking spaces and locating them internally on the bottom floors of the building, the developer Page 4of5 Engelhardt, Hammer & Asf ates Clearwater Gra* Code Criteria Analysis proposes to lighten traffic congestion caused by back-ups from parking constraints. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. The design complies with the tourist district flexible use section 2-803. Termination of Non-conforming status 6-109 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscapina standards established in section 3-1202(D). The parking is all internal to the structure and thus is not required to include landscaping. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. The developer will comply with all signage requirements in the site design process. 4. The comprehensive landscapinq and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. Not applicable. Conclusion: In summary, it is our professional opinion that the proposed project is in conformity with the City of Clearwater's land development regulations, is consistent with the Beach by Design guidelines, and will provide a positive benefit to the surrounding Clearwater Beach Community. Page 5 of 5 75 O O u? -t LO O O (i 00 O, LO O ? G7 'CIF ??j Do O J U) Ln O i e O 0 lw C) O O o I O I LO O cn U OJ 0 n U O O O C\i x m. ti o? -- / ta F ORIGINA ?? ` Ulm, tr I+ L-247:98 Rs2100.00' . A-0515'44' C LEN=247 89'(P) 247 91 M .ti i ?1 j4• I /RS• I • h, Iv ? ? I 0 O 1 I SRiPA1E h t I roe) I • 70 M1 s NEW RUEN77ON 1 4t ??? \ arm cam 14t" iIX1 fF? \\ 6-1 F2't ti' " ti NtTr 10- BRG-S 62'50'25 I.( ) ( ) r M,?•4F„w,\?y `? BRG_S 62'50'56' E(1? zovE k \. rt srav o % Air r Fr y r r 1 rr r i '??l 1 v _ rr i i t?9' ?II 11 9(iN 4 W I X E _? I v 0 a° BPK7l PAN= .i I SYA I PGGC S-A I 1 V SEAWALL LAE PLiT w ? L=102.48' i• R=1000.00' G=05'52'19' C LEN-10 2.44'(P? 102.45(M) BRG-N 60'2801 W(P) BRG-N 60'3554' M s anw w'.vN ?Cyti h? W w j cc CV CD CD ? ?, as ? I I? a . I + + V4 /1w • 6. Q Q/. i • mss, II?I?, r Y I? Syr,". ?J ?u • 1 ' r NF rn ¦ f tl ¦ a IF . s: -7 ' ? u. igfl? _ - qr rA.-- . ?? ?? ?r 1N??1 "Mm 19 i.e,,zt 1 ` ,r W CLEARWATER GRANDE COLORS 0 ROOF TILE: GLASS: 0 PI: P2: P3: P4: ?+ ? Y U 4 1 _ • C V / rD 1 This Document 1'rcpare(I 13t and Return to: Joseph J. Weisenfeld, Esq. WEISENFELD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 550 Biltmore Way Suite 1120 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 D ORIGINAL Parcel TDNumber: 17-29-15-05004-003-0080 uu Lill"U"LL,0111 2 Grantee #I TIN: 59-2904561 PLANNING & 1)EVT Special Warranty Deed ?lnQFCt? This Indenture, Made this day of , 2004 A.D., Between Alpha Beach Resort, Inc., a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida of the County of Pinellas State of Florida , grantor, and Clearwater Grande Development, LLC, a Florida limited liability company whose address is: 20001 Gulf Boulevard, Suite 5, Indian Shores, FL 33785 of the County of Pinellas State of Florida ? grantee. Witnesseth that the GRANTOR, f'or and in consideration ofthe sum of ------------------------TEN DOLLARS 10 DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said GRANTEE and GRANTEE'S heirs, successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of Pinellas State of Florida to wit: Lots 8 through 11, inclusive, Block C, of BAYSIDE 5, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 38, at Page 38, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject To: 1. Taxes and assessments for the year 2004 and all subsequent years. 2. Conditions, covenants, restrictions, and easements filed of record, provided that this instrument shall not reimpose same. Together will, all lawments, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Bold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that grantor has good tight and lawfid authority to sell and convey said land; that grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or tinder grantor. In Witness Whereof" tile grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, scaled and delivered in our presence: Alp Resort; Inc . Printed Name: Cherifert Jacquine By. (Seal) Ain r president Witness P.O. Address: 655 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, FL 33767 Prin eU Name : Cauchi Andre rlr,ptlb is of France Witness' oeparlment of the Bouches-du-Rhine t dux ' (Corporate Seal) EMBASSY OF TIIE UNITED STATES OF AMER1` AOf Marseille Country of Consulate General of Ih i'. City of 1/jj6ied States of America The lbregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, Ellen B . RBURN ofAmerica at } of August' Consul of the United States 18 ?IIarseill France duly commissioned and qualified, this day , 2004 by Alfred Gmnez, res3-dent of Alpha Beach Resort, Inc., a Florida Corporation, on behalf of the corporation he is personally known to utc or he has produced his Carte d t immatriculation Consrru__.laire as identification. + rr7r???y T Printed Name : F.1 1 an R T14OR RTIRN St llen 'R. lit 4J Notary Public {'nNSUL OF THE l:1NIT'ECI STA'1'F8 OFAMERICA My Commission Expires: Indefinitely • 1261-01 Laser Generated by *Display Systems, Inc., 2003 (863) 763.5555 Form FLSWD-1 0 • ORIGINAL Tree Inventory Clearwater Grande As required by the City of Clearwater Community Development Code, I have completed an assessment of all trees (8" dbh or greater) on the subject site and within 25' beyond the property lines. My opinion is set forth below as to the viability (rating of 1-5) and potential hazards of these trees. Rating Scale 1 through 5 (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) # Tree Size & Species Rating and other pertinent comments 1 10" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 2 9" Sabal Palm 3 Rating= 3 8" Queen Palm 3 Rating= 4 9" Queen Palm Rating = 3 5 11" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 6 12" Sabal Palm 3 Rating = 7 -8" Sabal Palm 3 Ratin g= 8 11" Sabal Palm = 3 Rating- 9 9" Sabal Palm Rating = 3. 10 9" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 11 10" Sabal Palm 3 Rating = 12 8" Sabal Palm ? Rating = 3 Pk r' ? .-? I? T,7 r1 13 8" Sabal Palm °'----=- 3 Rating= 14 12" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 1U 15 11" Sabal Palm Ratin 3 ! PLAN., g- 16 10" Sabal Palm w 3 Rating= rii ?j? 'ACS 0 0 ORIGINAL 17 8" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 18 11" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 19 12" Sabal Palm = 3 Rating- 20 12" Sabal Palm 3 Rating= 21 8" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 22 11" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 23 11" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 24 12" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 25 11" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 26 10" Sabal Palm Rating 3 = 27 11" Sabal Palm 3 Rating = 28 10" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 29 11" Sabal Palm 3 Rating= 30 10" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 31 8" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 32 8" Sabal Palm Rating =. 3 33 12" Sabal Palm Rating= 3 34 12" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 35 8" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 36 11" Sabal Palm 3 Rating= 37 11" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 38 12" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 39 9" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 40 13" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 41 8" Sabal Palm Rating= 3 p 42 10" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - f? ?, lJ + Lnnw • • ORIGINAL 43 22" Sabal Palm Rating= 4 44 11" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 45 12" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 46 12" Sabal Palm Rating 3 47 13" Phoenix dactylifera Rating = 5 48 13" dac Phoenix lifera Rating = 5 49 18" dac Phoenix lifera Rating = 5 50 11" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 51 9" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 52 10" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 53 14" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 54 10" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 55 13" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 56 12" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 57 11" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 58 11" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 59 11" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 60 10" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 61 10" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 62 10" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 63 10" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 64 12" Washin onia Rating = 3 65 11" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 66 12" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 67 10" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 68 11" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 69 10" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 70 10" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 71 12" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 72 13" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 I affirm that my opinions have been made in good faith, with no coercion from others. I further affirm that I have no interest with the parties or people involved with nor any interest with regard to the outcome. I 3 ne a uusjisus? t t, ice' f PLANN- C- 0 Since'erellny, Jam, ?J n /°t-;k) • 014 Chuck Butler, Certified Arborist Certificate #FL-1235A Butler's Nursery, Inc. 7011 75 h Street North Pinellas Park, Florida 33781 (727) 544-0445 - phone (727) 541-5027 - fax . 0 ORIGINAL s ??`'iY tip- (..:. _ °.; :."r, . s} ? 4 AUG-10-2005 WED 04;43 PM B -?h & Bay Realty, Inc, FAX NO. 7J965366 P. 02/16 Nov-12. 2004 12:17PM No-970 P- 216 ICI ORIGINAL TRAMC :MPACT STUDY AND PARKING STUDY I' FOR, CLEAR WATER GRANDE ,I CLEAltWATER , FLOP, MA. it i PREP A,RED FOR; CLEARW.E`ti.TER OR,ANDE D:E MELOM T, LLC PREPARED BY: GULrI COAST C:ON'SULTfNG, EqC. NOVEDABER 2004 PROJECT # 04-074. Robert Pergoiizzxi, A[CP AICP #9023 AUG-10-2005 WED 04:43 PM B?h & Bay Realtyj nc, ?l NOv.12. 2004 12:17PM l z. xrr3rIROU1'JMON FAX NO. 7965366 P, 03/16 No.9703 P. 3/16 ORIGINAL Clearwater GrMde J0evelopMext4 LLC. is proposing to redevelop their property on Clearwater Beach into a 93 room resort hotel with a 3,500 SI restaurant and a i parking garage, (See Figure 1) The redoveloprneoi: orthe propel- ty. is the subjelat o#` a Comprehensive infll Red'avelopr =t in Toauiat "T' ,=41ag district. 'this application-requires an asse M en't of the traffic :i xpa,cts of de'vWapinent axed it was dcte7mined a par king atvxdy should bo completed. As part of tina redavolopment 94 existing hotel zooms and rpsstauarallt will 1ae elintt ]aatcd (Qualiiy Jun). Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was estabUshcd with. tlae City of Clearwater staff. j )RXUI TXKG 3CX4,18`FIC C0N'iaJ JrJ'DNS The property has frontage on South Gulfview Boulevard east of Hamden Wve. South GulMew Boulevard is a three lane eolIeetor roadway' gumming along Clearwater. Beach. Hamden Drive intersects with S, Gulfview Boulevard at a signalized intersection. Traffic ootmtls conducted is November 2004 at the following intmections: S. Gal6dew Blvd. / Hamdea l)6ve S. Gulfvicw Blvd, / Bayway Blvd, S. Gulfview Drive / Existing Quality Inn Driveways All traffic counts were cojavertosd to a=nal ALvOmge eclu:ivalWs wwg FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. Ac??oxdia to the ? g trat<; carmts S. Qu1t"vYO,ru Boulevard dames 1,151 vehicles gist of Hamden Drive, and 977 vebicles adjaotmt to the site. Existing traffic volumes am shown in Figure 2.Existing ixitersec6ons were analyzed using the HCS software. The HCS Printouts an. included in Appendix A, E Presently the signalized intersection at S_ Ch0vieu, Ani 1levarri / FTarMdom T)r;.,g operates at LOS B with avwage delay bekg 12.4 seconds per vehicle. The intersection at S, GulfYiew Blvd. / Bayway Blvd. is "Y'I1a,LD "coai;rolled with Bayway Blvd. traffic yielding the Tight-of-way, Presextky at tbia i.ntarsccdon eastbound left tarns operate at LOS A and the :F ayway Blvd. approach (SB) operates at LOS B. South, Gulfview Boulevard #uno:tiom as major city (hop-state) roadway 810J3 according to FDOT 22Q QLOS JJNA book capacity table; has a, :LOS D capacity of 1,460 vehicles per hour since it has a continuous center tutu lane. Sauth GaMie w Boulevard presently opaxat s at ]LOS D during the peak hour, Ir Pl1'iNt?if•?G u DF' .?._?.,•? i •;i't??l 6' Y 6P C.. c ... i't'._ l i AUG-10-2005 WED 04:43 PM Be h & Bay Realty,Ine. Nov-12. 2004 12:17PM ` J .? ?wuialrrrrl li I ue IIYMI?11liiW>•O? a PROJECT' LOCAMN a:ss b Ir PROJECT LOCATION - CLEARWAaTJER ORATNUE oad?4' --- -??'- GU Gast Cans t i ig, Inc. DA•Z MUM Land Develapmuw Ccaasultiukff 11/20091 III a ~ G.J.5.. " 1 a ?1? ?Al?gnlol?u 11?1>•uwa»»fq? Mi a 0 v FAX NO. 7965366 P. 04/16 No.9 M P. x/16 ORIGINAL MIS BAYWA.Y SLVi . /?/IAI?AUI?il?irslFl?llr ?? 11 AUG-10-2005 WED 04:44 PM Be h & Bay Realty,Inc, FAX NO. 765366 P. 05/16 Nov,12, 2004 12:17PM No-9103 P. 5;16 w YNgR?YY??YYII?¦IYIYYII?on?rrrrr...w?.?.rrr.__..r....._? ORIGINAL N.T.5 0 r b I I' rp nl F' ?Y¦?rW,IJpgYYl?r?a? 254 3dS 462 ? 452 24.8 -183 f r?YW a 0 " --467 n 330 -. YY11°urY tte?¦uu¦w?tY¦¦ttu t?Y .??tnttt?Y.: SQL ?. I I 558 ? q,g .- 4 27 509---^ ^? q ? a0a -?- ? 5 '? 1 5 ? e i EXISTING PM PEAR HOUR TRAFFIC (2004) DA ?-` Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc, = I.twd Development Cansuitia?,g 11 10104 /2 ?•? F DUMB!(, ? es- f Y? ? r &? WLYYYYSY0?11..YYYY i m. ?eY?..rYY?¦1¦t¦u¦ 04--07'4_ MGM: .WY?rtl' AUG-10-2005 WED 04:49 PH B h & Bay Realty,Inc, ?f Nov-12. 2004 12:18PM FAX NO. 7*65366 P, 06/16 No,9703 P. 5/16 ORIGINAL As per the approved metbodolo& existing traffic -was adjusted by & 1.5% a=lud growth rate to the expected build-out year of 2006 to 4wcount for backgrcuud talc from other n+ea:rby redevelopr:tt,ent projeaty. The proposed Cleatwatez Grande redevelopment on the au.?ject propearty is expected to Gxnatai:n 93 resort ! hotel rooms, and a 3,500 square 1bot attached sit-down restwara,at. Par, will be j provided within -the stmcnrre, .As part of the redeveloprumt the t sting 94 botel rooms and 2,000 s.f rrestauramt will be elin: mated, although this bmffic was not deducted. Using Institute of Transportation Engineeas aTE) r Edition rates, the amount of now trips was calculated and estiamtes are shown below: I TRIP GENERATION EST11VIATES k Lad Use Resort Rotel Mcc. Rooms 830 46 r MIMMt 19 fil., 445 Tots! 1, 75 &F (43/41) I Me vebicular access will be talrea from S. Gut Cview 131-vd. and ele expel,•ted distribution is as follows. 60% to / Rom the north (f i0) 40% to / fxoxu the sQutb 4) leROJECT )i VA,CT CALCrrIA-floNs i 4 I??jact S, Gulview (Hamden - Site 3 42'%n S_ Qulfview (Site- C1wtr. ? 2LD 50 146G ws BzidBe) 2D 34 1460 2.33'49 h Future apeirations at $e S. GWfnew Boulevard / Hanidet Drive signsliz,:d 'b intersection, would continue at LOS B with average delay hxcsee4ng to 12.9 j sewnds per veMole, At the S. Gul.fvicw Blvd. / Bayway Blvd. intersection fle f' eastbound left turns would co>atizae to operate at LOS ,A and the Bay-way BINd. approach (SB) would coutinue, to opeme at LOS B. At the project entrance driveway (once-way esttmnce) $a:w 9. GuMew Blvd, Drive, westbound left tuns into that site would onetntp F0 T.n, A. At the project exit dxivewray (one-way =h) to S, Gul viov Boi> evard all exiting vehicles would oparate at LOS B. I s 1'J Ik it I 4 li f AUG-10-2005 WED 04:50 PM B h & Bay RealtyJ nc. Nov.12. 2004 12,18PM ! r? I i' i i O 9 PI) 0 1 2? ?lD IN 1 2 2 .f I--?. L369 266 &3S 601 - 51-, 28 551 ^ -?•? 323 ?? FAX NO. 7965366 P. 07/16 No-9100 P. 7/16 1?1 N.T.S 1 77 ?: ;? ; r - _, PLANr1N 32 u DEVELC'h 7, CA TY "c Qz' .y BIND. f f '?-- 5a5 ---497 II?UItlq?YA0A1?1 MUM I ??q{\IN 541 ZE ^- 25 '.6 ENTER E);17 FUTURE PM PEAK STOUR TRAFFIC` (2006) Gull f Coast Consulting, h c. D'' ? Land Devs:lopn=j CowWtbig 11 /2004 I I, 040"74 Skip' i; li AUG-10-2005 WED 04:50 PM Be ch & Bay Realty,Inc. FAX NO. 72 965366 P. 08/16 Nov,12. 2004 12:18PM "No-9703 P. 9/16 ORIGIN AL With, background tra£fie? and project traffic added S. GlulMew Blvd. would ew. y 1,236 vehicles east of Hamden Drive, and 1,038 bemen the site and Cleamwer Pass Bridge, This represents LOS D conditions on a three-lane collector road, which demonstrates acceptable operations. Future traffic voliamos ara shown, in Figure 3, and the EICS printouts g re included in Appendix B. IV. PARKING STUDY r The Quality Inn is located at 6,55 S. (3ulfview Boulevard and has long been a tourist destination .hotel. The rasoTt hotel, ccrritayns 94 hnfAl tnom,q, n ?. nnQ gniv?rr foot Intetuational House of Pancakes (MOP) restaurant on the titrcet level and 93 parking spapes. The site is located in the purist Cry zoning, district, and per Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code bays a iniWinum parkh3g l tegi*etrient of I space, per lo4y.m and 7.13 spibrj?s per' %0M sgatwe feet of restaurant space. According to s7 i,c.t interpretation of the code, -the misting h.)tel would requite a minimum of 118 parking spaces i ad a maximum o F 146 parl<dng spaces, therefore an apparent de-dcit exists. The radBvelolmitent will bacrea r+e tlae j parking supply to 118 spaces, per code minimurn. The code provides for rcducirig the required number of patting spaces to recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater Reach. erection 2-802 of the Community Development Cade allows a reduction in parking if the proporty ?. will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than adhemisc x•aquired or adequate parking is arrailable tbroagh existing or plm mcd arAd eon unniitted parking facilities within 1,000 :Feet of the p roperty. City of Clearwater staff has reco?*ied the Quality Imi is located directly on Clearwater Beach, in close proxirnity to the public beaches and the restaurant attracts customers froze;, the ho+1*1 itself as well as necwby lwtelshaotels anal ii residential condominiums within waildrtg distance, and dwxts is grw potential for "walk-up" customers. The varkinz lot is a mivgte lot reserved for hotel guests an. M patrons of the IKOP restaurant. 77buis paring aualysus was prepared to determine the availability of parking spaces. Prior to conducting this analysis % methodology was establilshad with 10 City of Clearwater staff. It was agreed GCC would conduct a pad&S auumaulation stkuly on a Friday betwocn 6 I'M and 10 PM, Saturday between 10 AM And 4 PM and 6 PM - 10 PM, Sunday between Ira AM rwd 4 PM and 6 PM to 9 PM. The stiuiy area included the Quality Inn parking lot only since public parkinglas and pro- street spaces are not in close proximity to the site :?:! ?J 1 r Lv.?3 ? F I _ j. PLAWNC g DEVELOPi-- r I ! S'JCS a . _ CCMY a L9 AUG-10-2005 WED 04:51 PM B h & Bay Realtyj nc. Nov-12. 2004 12:18PM 'V. EXISTING FARING GOl'4DI7IONS FAX NO, 765366 P. 09/16 No-9703 P• 9;16 ' ' ORIGINAL ]Existing conditions were es%blished by conducting ;parUig lot counts bemeen the horns of 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM on Friday November 5tb, 2004, Saturday November 6th, 2004 between 1.0:00 ,FPM and 4:00 SAM Fwd 6.00 PM and 10:00 PM, and Sunday November 714:.2004 between 10:00 AN( anal 4;00 PM and 6.00 PM and 9;00 MI. Weather condil:ioras Were tY1pical for early 1`ipvean1ber with a ldgb temperatur rs of 79 dcgneeis and low tcrrtpcnawres of 59 degreIX,, with. clear skies. No raze was =,;vuat=d at any time during the study. The QtWity Tin parldng lot was checked on the hour for tote zuxaber of sprtcr* that weso occapic.d. The number of occupied spas was noted and art hourly accumulated total'qras obtained. Friday November 5_,_2004 OR Friday evening the Quality Inn was at 100% occupanc.'yy -with all of the 94 rooms resnved.. Pang d nd did not vary significantly Opughout the evening with 56 occupied spaces (60%) for most of the evening to a ptialc demand of 61 occupied spaces (66%) at 10;00 I'M. As such, there were a minimum of 32 tmuscd spaces in the study art d roughout the cvming. Talylc 1 providm: an hourly tabulation, and PiWe .4 provides a VarA of ILourly pax-)dzg space occupancy. Saturday No?rember b 2004 On Saturday evening the Qualtp, Inn was at 100% occupancy with ail of the 94 rooxns reserved. Parking demand, waned si0ficantly throughout the day from :a low of 43 occupied spaces (46644) at 8 PM to a peak. doumd of 72 occulied spaces (77%) at 10:00 AM. As such, there wm a odnim,to, of 21 ti'used spaces throughout the day. Table 2 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 5 providcs'a graph of hourly parldng space occ apancy. unday Nome mba 2.20(x' 00 Sunday, avoni:ng %it Quality hue was at 99% or-impancy aith 93 of the 94 rooms reserved. Pa g; demand in the study area mui,ed moderately throughout the day with a low of 54 occtq ied spaces (580ro) at 12:00 Nooti, ad a pealc demand of 73 occupied spaces (7th°ru) at 9;00 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 20 unused spaces throughout the day. Table 3 provides an hourly tabulloia a and Figure 0 provides 'a graph of toe hourly parking space occupancy. L...J PLANNiNO& DEVEt. PN" 'SVGS AUG-10-2005 WED 04:52 PM B h & Bay Realty,Inc, FAX NO. 7 465366 P. 10/16 Nov.12, 2004 12:1BPM No-9703 P, 10/16 i i k, ORIGINAL TABLE 1 FRIDAY, NOVEMISER 5, 2004 Ii I TIME 0.00 Pm 7.00 PM 8"00 Pm 9:00 PM 10.00 PM QUALITY INN LOT o cc. TOVAI, , 55CUPIC.p 60 93 66% .s6 93 60% 66 93 Sao' Be 93 60°? 61 93 66% i I' 1 i f ? PLANNIiVG & DEVEL Pmt-- T SVGS ,? i 9 c z o N O N CD CTl N :2-- d rrl o d CD CTl CYJ W _0 O r S PLJ C (D O 9 x 0 r\D w rn CTl w W 07 0 0 w -n ,b rn 07 AUG-10-2005 WED 04:53 PM B h & Bay Realty,Io. Nov-12, 2004 12,19PM TABLE 2 SATURDAY NOVEMBER Or 2004 i l TIME 1Q00 AM 11,00 AM 1,2.00 PN 1:00 PM 2:00 ISM 3:00 FM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 7:00 PM 3:00 PM 9°00 PM 10;00 PM Lai.Pat i r Kiln I-IV a C. TOTAL °.,- IOCO I IED T2 03 F° 55 03 69% 51 93 55% .58 03 82% .56 93 60% 60 93 65% :54 93 58 .61 03 66% '50 93 54% 43 93 46% 56 93 60% 85 93 70% FAX NO. 7965366 P. 12/16 No.9703 P- 12/16 ORIGINAL ,a A 9% PLAP3WNG & DE`fE1,0t,.. i t S`J I? i! z o { I RJ FlCa RE.5 - SATURDAY NOVEMBER 61 2004 00 90 -- ? - --- - - $0_ - C3 TO 50 40- 30- 0 2 #0 v rte, klz)r fb' N' f6-- CS lealLY 1-35 BAY O ?v O CSI o? od 0 ?W ?s x 0 cn w CD zcn O G-) Q• ? U D W t- CD AUG-10-2005 WED 04:54 PM B h & Bay Realty,Inc. ; Nov,12, 2004 12:19PM I I I TABLE 3 II : SUNDAY, NOVIIMBER 7, 2004 TIMA 10.06 AN 11:00 AN 12:00 PIV 1:00 FAIN 2:06 PM 3:00 PIN 4.00 PM 6:00 PU k 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PN I? I4 i I' I G' N I?I1 I I G h I @4 I I? QUALMY INN LOT CICC. TOTAL % OCCUPIED 65 93 _ 7094, ?..,. 61 93 6E9? 6d 9.3 580A 57 9:3 61% 882 as -67% 61 J:3 6696 ? 58 93 609s 71 93 76% L t69 83 93 93 70% 74% 78% FAX NO. 7 965366 P. 14/16 No?97H P• 14 16 ORIGINAL' II I - I or Alt'S', 11 K,'Z PLANtV-- '3 8 Dv -UCS is co L - 0. ` V r sr do 3 Ctf DO:8 ns3 Mg M OD-L V+ld W9 MOV O 4"fct OTIC YYd O I:Z V]d °0'? V1 OM VIVO ):X b MOO: 0 m co C5 x T C) a - ro m a r6 s m a ra- LO 0 ?s- ? o ry o 3 ? . LO O cv O ^ C11 I 7 O I a z ME `,t dMM3AON AVON€1S- 9 @HnM R-' -71 C ; t as 0 ov ? s 09 M a 0 aL 09 06 0% Q AUG-10-2005 WED 04;55 PM B h & Bay Realtyj nc, Nov,12, 2004 12:19PM FAX N0. 7#65366 P. 16/16 No.9702 P. 16/16 VI. FC17C>r E CoNDTI` omswfm REDEVELOPMENT The proposed modifications wotdd'result in 118 on sine pazl?zg spaces. The hotal would requite 118 to 146 par ig spaces according; to stdct interpi-nation of ifie code, Aysswning the worst case, a ;minimum of 45 parldug spices (118-73) would be available to satisfy any increased demand cxeattad by the: restaurant expansion, Assruning the 1,500 st restaurant expaxsion requires between 7-15 spaces per 1,000 s.f the increased demand would be between 11 and 23 spaces. TheTeions, adequate ,pkking will be available, to support the propoml ria4evelopmmt. Vim. CONCLUMN This analysis was wnductcd in accordance w7itla a !rpeciflc methodology establiskked with pity of Clam-tvater stAff, Tlxi,i analysis &-monst?Ues krtfiic, nperations'at nearby interseefions and on adiac=t roa&vays would con,tiuue at acceptable' levels of service and the impact is mininasl. Ibis analysis also demonstrates of the 93 parld ng spaces included on-site, a minimum. of 73 were occupied dying any hour of this study peziod..As such, the hotel and restaumut parldng demands are satisfied although *parking mipply is below code requirements, With the redevelopment increasing the paa*ing srtplaly to 118 spaces, future expansion, of the restaurant can easily be aemm modatezd. ORIGINAL AU G 1 17n 5 me at 4Y ITIC, rnA IIU lCi3?0?3oq S ua , ,,,v „, n ? ttu ucactt u Y i.t+d.Y.`r,'?y?w,zwcwiaops?u'siat4 mw.+.wn,,?....:?.:....,a.,w.,::.:,?:a.+....:>>?t•:,,»..:+....,......;.,:...; This Document Prepared By and Return , Joseph J. Weisenfeld, Esq. KARL KARLLgSFENF ?E BLAKE CLERKOFCOURt WESSENltmo e ASSOCIATES, P.A. INST# 2004381819p97ORID OFF R 4at04:49PM SSA Suite 112r Way EC13K;13a2YPO' ORIGINAL Coral. Gables, Vlorida 33134 d?S 0rE ?CORAtNG $70.0594300.00 Parcel In Number: 17-29-15-05004 -003-0080 Grantee ll t TIN: 59-2904561 Special Warranty Deed This Indenture, Madethls day of , 2004 AA., Between Alpha Beach Resort, Inc., a-corporation existing under the larva of the State of Florida of the County.or Pinellas , Statc of Florida , grantor, and Clearwater Grande Development, LLC, a Florida limited liability company whose address is; 20001 Gulf Boulevard, Suite 5, Indian Shores, FL 33785 of the County or Pinellas , State of Florida , grantee. Witnesseth that the GRANTOR for mid to conslderation of tite sum of ------------------------TEN DOLLARS ($10) -_----_-- _--_--_----_ Dot.Y.An. and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTUR in haml paid by MAN'TrP, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has grunted, bargaihed and said to the said GRANTEr and GRAN'MES heirs, successors and assigns lbrover, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County or. Pinellas State of Florida to wit. Lots 8 through 11, inclusive, Block C, of 33AYSIDZ 5, acoording to the Plat thereof, as recorded in plat Book 38, at Page 38, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject To: 1. Saxes and assessments for the year '2004 and all subsequent years. 2, Conditions, covenants, restrictions, and easements filed of record, provided that this instrument shall not reimpose same. Together with all tenements, hercditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertntaing. To Have and to Hold, the same in no simple forever. And the grantor hereby CaVenants will] suid grantee that grantor it lawfully seized of said tend in fee simple; thus grantor bus good right and lawilt authority to sell and convey said land; that grantor hereby fully wurrunts the title to said laud and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under grantor. In Witness Whereof, the grantor has hereunto set its hand and seat the day and year firat above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: p a Beach Resort, Inc. ty?- $y,-. (Sea[) Printed Name: Cherifert Jacquine A:1f IN-d- President Witness RG. Address: 655 South G uifAcw 8aulavard, Cleanvuter, r, L 33767 Piin Name : auchi Andre tae):iublic of France Witness - Department of the Bouches-du-17h6ne $s", (Corporate Sena EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATICS OF AMERMAOf Marseille Country of Consulate General of the f" City of tae, Ellen B.?li a gates otAmeffCa ??n?ti)x?U[?t? The foregoing instrument was aclmawlcdgcd before 18 Alt us t' Cnusui of flat united States of America at duty commissioned and quulilled, this day of.. & , 2004 by ll Alfred irsnaei .z,.e es Fran e ident of Alpha Beach Resort, Inc., a Florida Corporation.,on,, behalf of the corporation o e or h`'d hds groduecd big as cation. ideotiG m is personalty knCtm Carted r intmatriculation Consulaire Printed Name: r..i T an r;_TBORAAURN EI.Yet? 13, THORBUBN xott.try Public ;WNSUL OF THE My Commission Expires: Indefinitely „ WlED STATES OF AMEMA 1 , At lG 1 1 204-3 Lnnc+GanwAlad by 0 o6pliq syck-mr, tea, 20ut at0l •10-seas Pomp ri.swu.t Horthside 5"M" smi&a 1000 • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • STORMWATER REPORT FOR: IVNITH CLEARWATER GRANDE PROJECT AlS1 2u5 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Y Y F?. Y ? Nor. ®?? .•. Ram p, ae1, P. ' 4x3'1 PRO August 2005 Project No. 0450 • Clearwater Grande • ORIGINAL Environmental 1. Vault Wed by city engineer 2. Skimmers provided see details sheet C6.1 retention vault detail 3. Details and sections provided see details sheet C6.1 inlet detail, underdrain detail, plan view, retention vault detail and structure detail retention vault 4. Maintenance schedule attached Stormwater 1. Through the underdrain system ->control structure -> discharge at the sea wall. See underdrain detail, retention vault detail and plan view 2. Through the overflow inlet ->control structure -> discharge at the sea wall. 3. Detail provided. See sheet C6.1 underdrain detail. 4. Recovery analysis provided. The underdrain should recovery the quality volume in less than 28 hours. See attached spreadsheet. ---.CATY OF i NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES RETENTION VAULT DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS PROJECT: Clearwater Grande PROJECT NO.: 450 VOLUME PROVIDED = 2,310 C. F. BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 5.00 BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 3.50 UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 2.50 COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) = 0.09 FT/MIN LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 20 FT SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH • ORIGINAL POND AREA (SF) = POND AREA (SF) = 1,540 S.F. 1,540 S.F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HYD. GRAD. FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT FT/FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 5.00 1,540 2.06 0.38 2.75 0.75 31 2.12 578 272 4.63 1,540 1.69 0.38 2.75 0.61 31 1.73 578 333 4.25 1,540 1.31 0.38 2.75 0.48 31 1.35 578 428 3.88 1,540 0.94 0.38 2.75 0.34 31 0.96 578 599 3.50 1,540 TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME _ TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME = 2,310 C. F. 27.2 HOURS 2cz ORIGINAL August 10, 2005 Mr. Steve Page 2001 Gulf Boulevard, Suite 5 Indian Shores, Florida 33785 Reference: Clearwater Grande MISS 1 2U"43 CITY OF C: Subject: Maintenance and Operation of the Detention Vault Dear Mr. Page: Per the rules and regulations of the Southwest Florida Water Management District, we are required to furnish you with a set of instructions for maintenance and operation of the detention vault. The detention vault is designed to maintain certain volumes of rainfall runoff corresponding to specific water elevations in the lake. The control structure regulates the level of the water in the vault. The volume above the slot should be discharged under a grease skimmer and through the slot within a few hours following a storm event. The volume below the slot should take less than 36 hours to be discharged through natural ground infiltration. The water level in the vault should drop approximately 1' below the slot and the vault should be dry within 36 hours following a storm event, assuming there is no interceding rainfall. Here are some suggested procedures to keep the system functional: The bottom of the vault should be inspected regularly to assure that excess siltation has not occurred. Siltation of the vault shall be controlled to assure that the storage volume is not affected. Periodic cleaning of the vault bottom and removal of silts is required. It is required that cleaning be done every six (6) months. ORIGINAL • Grass clippings and other debris should be removed from the parking area to assure they are not transported to the retention vault. • The control structure should be checked monthly and after severe rainfall events and all debris cleared. • Your Management of Surface Water Permit should contain a number of conditions which must be met. If you have any questions or concerns about this project please do not hesitate to call our office. Sincerely, Nortl side Engineering Services, Inc. ;ant„°,, ??? •" e i a n P Rim CtWco o t b °?q Senior. n D Pi MIS 1 1 2033 PLAIU,^?;?" FLD2005-07072 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD Date Received: 07/01/2005 CLEARWATER. GRANDE DEV LLC ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 285A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW CLWCoverSheet i ' i !- Fcc It 0 P-- ,;,,? ' AM, 1 1 2005 PLANN ., G F 0FVFiL0P-, NT SVCS ? ??? o? P ?coy EN,to f 1 W 4 U5:,v MIAlwl4wV 100 ?T mm 44 y ? . ,. •ti• ?' ?,i I}-d' 11 .? ? ` N L 77 ? .4? ' •?•?, ??+??.?•????. ?/?%' / ? ' ?1 ? ??, ?? ter, ??. • , • •. ? -`I'r 'fir: '\- `, _` ? !III/ / • . ? ? , '. • • ' S P t, • ' • 1 in ?e d + . , ENE residl •• d •r7 ? Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Steve Page [stevepage@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 11:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: Re: Clearwater Grande Wayne, I am not sure but I bet we could increase parking. I just am thinking of making the units smaller which might let us reduce some height. We would keep the building looking the same. Thank you for always responding to everyone's questions. I appreciate the time and effort that you always put into helping answer questions. Steve Original Message From: Wavne.Wells(a)mvClearwater.com To: stevepage@tampabay.rr.com Cc: michael.delk-)MyClearwater.com Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 6:54 PM Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Steve - Section 4-406 sets out the parameters for Minor Revisions: A. Minorrevisions. The community development coordinator is authorized to allow minor revisions to an approved Level Two approved after receipt of comments from the development review committee. A minor revision is one which: 1. Does not result in conflicts in on-site circulation and/or negative impacts with ingress/egress. 2. Does not change the use unless such change is of a similar or less intensity, as determined by the community development coordinator. 3. Does not increase the density or intensity of the development 4. Does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area. 5. Does not result in a substantial change to the location of a structure previously approved. 6. Does not result in a substantial modification or the cancellation of any condition placed upon the application as originally approved. 7. Does not add property to the parcel proposed for development. 8. Does not increase the height of the buildings in a manner that will change the overall height of the project, will not alter the scale of the project, does not exceed the maximum height permitted in by the applicable special area plan and zoning district. 9. Any other minor revision that does not substantially alter the character and design of the project. B. Other revisions. Any other adjustments or changes not specified as "minor" shall be granted only in accordance with the procedures for original approval. Off-hand, it would appear that a reduction in height may be acceptable, depending on how it changes (?) the elevations of the building. Changes to interior floor plans for the units is acceptable, but how the changes (?) relate to the building elevations may be a question. Since you had 68 dwelling units and only a parking ratio of 1.59, is there any ability to redesign to obtain a minimum of two parking spaces per unit? Wayne -----Original Message----- 2/23/2007 0 0 Page 2 of 2 From: Steve Page [mailto:stevepage@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 2:32 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Clearwater Grande Wayne, Can you give me the parameters for changes that can be made to an approved plan such as Clearwater Grande? I know that Enchantment was allowed to make certain changes if they are of less impact and meet certain criteria. Can we reduce the height of the building? Can we change interior floorplans? I would like to possibly make smaller units and therefore I could take one or 2 floors out of the building. Please help me with understand what we can and cannot do. Thanks for your help, Steve Page 2/23/2007 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 6:54 PM To: 'Steve Page' Cc: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Steve - Section 4-406 sets out the parameters for Minor Revisions: A. Minor revisions. The community development coordinator is authorized to allow minor revisions to an approved Level Two approved after receipt of comments from the development review committee. A minor revision is one which: 1. Does not result in conflicts in on-site circulation and/or negative impacts with ingress/egress. 2. Does not change the use unless such change is of a similar or less intensity, as determined by the community development coordinator. 3. Does not increase the density or intensity of the development 4. Does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area. 5. Does not result in a substantial change to the location of a structure previously approved. 6. Does not result in a substantial modification or the cancellation of any condition placed upon the application as originally approved. 7. Does not add property to the parcel proposed for development. 8. Does not increase the height of the buildings in a manner that will change the overall height of the project, will not alter the scale of the project, does not exceed the maximum height permitted in by the applicable special area plan and zoning district. 9. Any other minor revision that does not substantially alter the character and design of the project. B. Other revisions. Any other adjustments or changes not specified as "minor" shall be granted only in accordance with the procedures for original approval. Off-hand, it would appear that a reduction in height may be acceptable, depending on how it changes (?) the elevations of the building. Changes to interior floor plans for the units is acceptable, but how the changes (?) relate to the building elevations may be a question. Since you had 68 dwelling units and only a parking ratio of 1.59, is there any ability to redesign to obtain a minimum of two parking spaces per unit? Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Steve Page [maiIto: stevepage@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 2:32 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Clearwater Grande Wayne, Can you give me the parameters for changes that can be made to an approved plan such as Clearwater Grande? I know that Enchantment was allowed to make certain changes if they are of less impact and meet certain criteria. Can we reduce the height of the building? Can we change interior floorplans? I would like to possibly make smaller units and therefore I could take one or 2 floors out of the building. Please help me with understand what we can and cannot do. Thanks for your help, Steve Page 2/22/2007 i C ITY OF C LEARWA.TER {I. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0, Posy OFFICE. Box 4748, CLEARWATFR FI.ORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SEIRVICIS BUILDING, 100 SOUTH IMYRTu, AVENUE, C1,8ARWAl'rR, FI.ORIDA 33756 'fEu: HoNI: (727) 562-4567 FAx (727} 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DrvT-,i.oP,,iEN-i- REVIEW February 21, 2007 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: FLD2005-07072 - 645 - 655 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Williams: On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 645 - 655 South Gulfview Boulevard shall be submitted by March 20, 2008. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you- have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael ?) ?AIC _- Planning Director S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) Ilnactive or Finished Applications IGulfview S 0645 - 0655 Clearwater Grande Condos #2 (7) - ApprovedlGulfview S 655 CDR Time Extension Development Order 2.21.07.doc PRANK I Iucit: RD, 1bLAYOR Ju11a D(w?\'N, On Ncn_?n[. YI41;1t f Ic» r I lA n1:rc»:. Cot .-,cai.>t1:N1w:R 1311.1. JU;NSON, Cclt:,?r.u.: m: nsr; C:ARLP.R A. PF[ F1,'S1:.\, COI NU NIENHWK "I"QUA1. 1"MITOYMENr Ar.D Ai:i:wmA'rlvlt Ac'ru>N I?.MPI.M ER" • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:19 AM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07072, 645 - 655 South Gulfview Boulevard Doreen - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced case (time extension). This case will be heard by the CDB on February 20, 2007, at 1:00 pm at City Hall (being placed on the Consent portion of the CDB agenda). Wayne >, ;ulfview S 655 Time Extension ... Northam e January 9, 2006 Community Development Board c/o Michael Delk Planning Director 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Clearwater Grande - FLD2005-07072 655 Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Delk: CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVI RONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER We would like to formally request a one-year time extension to the Development Order for case FLD2005-07072. Previously we requested a six month extension which was granted and this will be expiring on March 20, 2007. Due to the downfall of the condominium market, or real estate in general in Florida, it currently is not feasible to move forward with construction at this time. In addition, the architect is still tweaking his design for the interior spaces of the building. We want to assure you that we are working diligently on this project and that it will be built to the architectural standards of the City of Clearwater and be a building everyone can be proud of. We appreciate you placing this agenda item on the next CDB hearing in regards to this extension. Thank you in advance for your cooperation; we awaiting hearing from you with a confirmed date of the hearing. Sincerely, i oreen A. Williams Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N@MI NDSPRI NG.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 01/10/2007 13:13 7274468 Hortusibe IK#" sw&a "IBC. January 9, 2006 Cornmunity Development Board c/o Michael Delk Planning Director 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Clearwater Grande - FLD2005-07072 655 Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr_ Delk: NOIRTHSIDE ENG S PAGE 01/01 i OVI L • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMEN IAL • TRAN5PORTATION • ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 10 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER We would like to formally request a one-year time extension to the Development Order for case F.LD2005-07072. Previously we requested a six month extension which was granted and this will be expiring on March 20, 2.007. Due to the downfall of the condominium market, or real estate in general in Florida, it currently is not feasible to move forward with construction at this time. In addition, the architect is still tweaking his design for the interior spaces of th..e building. We want to assure you that we are working diligently on this project and that it will be built to the architectural standards of the City of Clearwater and be a building everyone can be proud of We appreciate you placing this agenda item on the next CDB hearing in regards to this extension. Thank, you in advance for your cooperation; we awaiting hearing from you with a confirmed date of the hearing. Sincerely, oreen A. Will.iatns Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STRUT, St.li i'f: 9 C? C,LEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN0-MINDSPRIN6.C0M NESTECH nMIN05PRING.CO/v% 727 • 443 ? 2869 FAX 7?7 •1446 • 8036 ,* r` vision of Corporations • • Page 1 of 2 _? t r71?fa 1?I1 ,w?1 Florida Limited Liability CLEARWATER GRANDE HOLDINGS, L.L.C. PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 20001 GULF BLVD., SUITE 5 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 MAILING ADDRESS 20001 GULF BLVD., SUITE 5 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 Document Number FEI Number Date Filed L04000049230 201313584 06/30/2004 State Status Effective Date FL ACTIVE 06/30/2004 Last Event NAME CHANGE Event Date Filed Event Effective Date AMENDMENT 08/15/2005 NONE Total Contribution 0.00 Registered Agent Name & Address ARSENAULT, KENNETH G JR. 10225 ULMERTON ROAD, SUITE 2 LARGO FL 33771 11 Manager/Member Detail Name & Address Title PAGE, STEPHEN J 20001 GULF BLVD., SUITE 5 MGRM INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a 1=DETFIL&n1=LO4000049230&n2=NAMFW... 1/25/2007 k- Division of Corporations • • Page 2 of 2 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2005 03/11/2005 2006 02/09/2006 Previous Filing Return tq List Next Filing View Events View Name History Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT i60---r- Corporafions Helps http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&n1=L04000049230&n2=NAMFW... 1/25/2007 Division of Corporations ? • Page 1 of 1 T) ;7"' " e^t',t'????1"lt?Tt7FI4 Public Inquiry CLEARWATER GRANDE HOLDINGS, L.L.C. Document Number : Date Filed Effective Date Status L04000049230 06/30/2004 06/30/2004 Active EVENT TYPE FILED EFFECTIVE DESCRIPTION DATE DATE NAME 08/15/2005 OLD NAME WAS : CLEARWATER GRANDE DE CHANGE AMENDMENT VELOPMENT, LLC THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry F-Co'rpo-rations Help http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/corevt.exe?al=DETNAM&nl=L04000049230&n2=FLAL 1/25/2007 Pinellas County Property App ser Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 0 0 Page 2 of 5 17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 003 / 0080 25-Jan-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 07:55:59 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales CLEARWATER GRANDE DEU LLC OBK: 13822 OPG: 0129 20001 GULF BLVD STE 5 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785-2417 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 645 S GULFUIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02 l f 2004 2005 sa es rom - : 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 9 /2,004 13,822/ 129 13,500,000 (U) I 1955: Book 038 Pgs 038-039 5 /1,992 7,91612,176 5,000,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - i /1,992 7,78111,314 365,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 8,305,200 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 8,305,200 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 8,305,200 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Gulf Of Mexico Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 180,754.37 1) 251 x 261 150.00 65, 139.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 180, 754.37 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 180, 754.37 Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 5 BLK C, LO TS 8,9,10,11 AND Description RIP RTS Building Information http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=l 7... 1/25/2007 Pinellas County Property Appser Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 00 11 0 Page 3 of 5 Property_and Land Use._Code descriptions 17 l 20 1 15 1 05004 1 003 0080 :01 25-Jan-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 07:55:59 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel > 3 St Property Address: 645 S GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 Structural E1?m?nts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 91 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 286 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,970 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sulam Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 47,968 7) .00 0 2) Utility .55 502 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .30 6,625 9) .00 0 4) Canopy .25 624 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) . 00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 a ? omm c r c i a1 E t r a F? at ur c s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 27000SF 1.75 27,000 47,250 47,250 999 2) COHC PAUE 2152SF 4.00 2,152 8,610 8,610 999 3) ELEU PASS 5-STOP 30,000.00 2 60,000 24,000 1,970 4) POOL IRREG 30, 000. 00 1 30,000 12,000 1,970 5) FIRESPRINK 3000SF 1.75 3,000 5,250 2,260 1,970 6) SHUFBDCT 500.00 2 1,000 1,000 999 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 95,120 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) 41 Pq http://136.174.187.131htbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=17... 1/25/2007 4 Pinellas County Property Ap ser Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 0 Page 4 of 5 4- 194 'ZW4 f ri JLFE'4+46L, BLVD A.YWAY ? ` 22,-04 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) UL 56 46, VJF& I' + http://136.174.187.131htbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=17... 1/25/2007 Pl,nel las t-'ounty? Property ApT :, ,wr In.-on iatit?.n: 17 20 I'S 0-5004 003 0080 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas CoungT Property Appraiser Parcel Information Rack to Search I.ittp:r'/13tt.174.187.13%htbiii cgi-sci:3'?or--1aYz<i:::I&b:::.l&c::i&r:::.16&s:::4&t3::_:I&u=-=Up-17... 1/25/200 4 _ ? • ? Page 1 of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Steve Page [stevepage@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:34 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Doreen@northsideengineering.com Cc: Garriott, Kevin; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Thanks Wayne just wanted clarification as to whether or not you had to be issued a final building permit prior to March. I do not plan to apply for the permit until I am ready to go ahead. As of right now I do plan to apply for the extension with cdb. Steve From: Wayne.Wells@myC[earwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:25 AM To: Doreen@northsideengineering.com; stevepage@tampabay.rr.com Cc: Kevin.Garriott@myClearwater.com; michael.delk@MyClearwater.com Subject: Clearwater Grande Doreen/Steve - I will throw out a message of caution regarding "submitting for a building permit" to comply with Code requirements to vest the project related to the Development Order. Submitting for a building permit means that you will be submitting construction plans meeting ALL Code requirements and diligently pursuing obtaining the issuance of the building permit, meaning that you just can't submit and then let it sit for lengths of time without any activity. This would also mean that permits to demolish the existing improvements are also necessary to be submitted. Should there be a great length of time once the permit application has been submitted and/or from the dates reviews have been completed, Development Services could declare the permit void and you could be in a position of the Development Order becoming void. Additionally, issuance of a building permit means that work must commence and obtain timely inspections, or again, Development Services could declare the permit void for lack of work and then the Development Order could also become void. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:Doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 10:11 AM To: Steve Page; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Steve, submit plans. As long as a BCP number is issued, this stops the DO clock From: Steve Page [mailto:stevepage@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:34 AM To: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com Cc: Doreen Williams Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Wayne, Thank you for your prompt reply. Other than CDB you said our option was to apply for the building permit. 1/11/2007 ??? . • Page 2 of 3 . Do you mean submit plans or actually acquire the permit before the March deadline? Steve From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:17 AM To: stevepage@tampabay.rr.com Cc: Doreen@northsideengineering.com; michael.delk@MyClearwater.com Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Steve - I have spoken to Michael Delk regarding your request. The six-month time extension granted will stand as written. Any further time extension must be granted by the CDB, which must be prior to the expiration date, and can be for no more than a one year. Wayne ----=Original Message----- From: Steve Page [mailto:stevepage@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 1:52 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'Doreen Williams' Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Wayne, Would your department consider granting additional time beyond the 6 months that was previously granted? It appears that your department has the ability to grant up to a total one year before an applicant must go to CDB. hope you enjoyed your holidays and that you have a great new year! Thanks, Steve Page From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:20 AM To: Doreen@northsideengineering.com Cc: Housh@northsideengineering.com; stevepage@tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Doreen - You do not necessarily need to request a time extension from the CDB. You could submit an application for a building permit to construct the approved site improvements. However, should you not desire this option, then a letter of request must be submitted requesting a maximum of a one- year time extension. The letter must state the reason(s) for the time extension request (good cause - see Section 4-407). The request for a time extension must be approved/denied by the CDB during the time period the Development Order is still valid (meaning by at least the March 20, 2007, CDB meeting). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [maiIto: Doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:10 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Housh Ghovaee; Steve Page 1/11/2007 • • Page 3 of 3 Subject: Clearwater Grande Hi Wayne, Quick question. The extended development order on the above project is going to expire in March. Do I have to go to CDB for a 1 year extension? If so, do I just need to send you a letter? Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727-443-2869 / Fax: 446-8036 / Cell: 235-8474 Email: doreen north sideengineering.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.4 10 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/620 - Release Date: 1/8/2007 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.8/621 - Release Date: 1/9/2007 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.4 10 / Virus Database: 268.16.8/621 - Release Date: 1/9/2007 1/11/2007 h _ - 4 0 0 Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Steve Page [stevepage@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:34 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Doreen Williams Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Wayne, Thank you for your prompt reply. Other than CDB you said our option was to apply for the building permit. Do you mean submit plans or actually acquire the permit before the March deadline? Steve From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10., 2007 9:17 AM To: stevepage@tampabay.rr.com Cc: Doreen@northsideengineering.com; michael.delk@MyClearwater.com Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Steve - I have spoken to Michael Delk regarding your request. The six-month time extension granted will stand as written. Any further time extension must be granted by the CDB, which must be prior to the expiration date, and can be for no more than a one year. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Steve Page [maiIto: stevepage@tampabay. rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 1:52 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'Doreen Williams' Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Wayne, Would your department consider granting additional time beyond the 6 months that was previously granted? It appears that your department has the ability to grant up to a total one year before an applicant must go to CDB. I hope you enjoyed your holidays and that you have a great new year! Thanks, Steve Page From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:20 AM To: Doreen@northsideengineering.com Cc: Housh@northsideengineering.com; stevepage@tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Doreen - You do not necessarily need to request a time extension from the CDB. You could submit an application 1/10,12007 ..? • ? Page 2 of 2 for a building permit to construct the approved site improvements. However, should you not desire this option, then a letter of request must be submitted requesting a maximum of a one-year time extension. The letter must state the reason(s) for the time extension request (good cause - see Section 4-407). The request for a time extension must be approved/denied by the CDB during the time period the Development Order is still valid (meaning by at least the March 20, 2007, CDB meeting). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:Doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:10 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Housh Ghovaee; Steve Page Subject: Clearwater Grande Hi Wayne, Quick question. The extended development order on the above project is going to expire in March. Do I have to go to CDB for a 1 year extension? If so, do I just need to send you a letter? Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727-443-2869 / Fax: 446-8036 / Cell: 235-8474 Email: doreen .northsideengineering.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.4 10 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/620 - Release Date: 1/8/2007 1/10/2007 0 . Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:33 AM To: 'Steve Page' Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Code only requires submission for the building permit. -----Original Message----- From: Steve Page [mailto:stevepage@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:34 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Doreen Williams Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Wayne, Thank you for your prompt reply. Other than CDB you said our option was to apply for the building permit. Do you mean submit plans or actually acquire the permit before the March deadline? Steve From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:17 AM To: stevepage@tampabay.rr.com Cc: Doreen@northsideengineering.com; michael.delk@MyClearwater.com Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Steve - have spoken to Michael Delk regarding your request. The six-month time extension granted will stand as written. Any further time extension must be granted by the CDB, which must be prior to the expiration date, and can be for no more than a one year. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Steve Page [mailto:stevepage@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 1:52 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'Doreen Williams' Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Wayne, Would your department consider granting additional time beyond the 6 months that was previously granted? It appears that your department has the ability to grant up to a total one year before an applicant must go to CDB. I hope you enjoyed your holidays and that you have a great new year! Thanks, Steve Page From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] 1/10/2007 Page 2 of 2 Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:20 AM To: Doreen@northsideengineering.com Cc: Housh@northsideengineering.com; stevepage@tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Doreen - You do not necessarily need to request a time extension from the CDB. You could submit an application for a building permit to construct the approved site improvements. However, should you not desire this option, then a letter of request must be submitted requesting a maximum of a one- year time extension. The letter must state the reason(s) for the time extension request (good cause - see Section 4-407). The request for a time extension must be approved/denied by the CDB during the time period the Development Order is still valid (meaning by at least the March 20, 2007, CDB meeting). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:Doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:10 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Housh Ghovaee; Steve Page Subject: Clearwater Grande Hi Wayne, Quick question. The extended development order on the above project is going to expire in March. Do I have to go to CDB for a 1 year extension? If so, do I just need to send you a letter? Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727-443-2869 / Fax: 446-8036 / Cell: 235-8474 Email: doreen northsideengineering.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.4 10 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/620 - Release Date: 1/8/2007 1/10/2007 Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:17 AM To: 'Steve Page' Cc: 'Doreen Williams'; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Steve - I have spoken to Michael Delk regarding your request. The six-month time extension granted will stand as written. Any further time extension must be granted by the CDB, which must be prior to the expiration date, and can be for no more than a one year. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Steve Page [mailto:stevepage@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 1:52 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'Doreen Williams' Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Wayne, Would your department consider granting additional time beyond the 6 months that was previously granted? It appears that your department has the ability to grant up to a total one year before an applicant must go to CDB. I hope you enjoyed your holidays and that you have a great new year! Thanks, Steve Page From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:20 AM To: Doreen@northsideengineering.com Cc: Housh@northsideengineering.com; stevepage@tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Doreen - You do not necessarily need to request a time extension from the CDB. You could submit an application for a building permit to construct the approved site improvements. However, should you not desire this option, then a letter of request must be submitted requesting a maximum of a one-year time extension. The letter must state the reason(s) for the time extension request (good cause - see Section 4-407). The request for a time extension must be approved/denied by the CDB during the time period the Development Order is still valid (meaning by at least the March 20, 2007, CDB meeting). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:Doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:10 AM To: Wells, Wayne 1/10/2007 Cc: Housh Ghovaee; Steve Page Subject: Clearwater Grande Hi Wayne, 0 Page 2 of 2 Quick question. The extended development order on the above project is going to expire in March. Do I have to go to CDB for a 1 year extension? If so, do I just need to send you a letter? Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727-443-2869 / Fax: 446-8036 / Cell: 235-8474 Email: doreenanorthsideengineering.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.4 10 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/620 - Release Date: 1/8/2007 1/10/2007 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:20 AM To: 'Doreen Williams' Cc: Housh Ghovaee; Steve Page Subject: RE: Clearwater Grande Doreen - You do not necessarily need to request a time extension from the CDB. You could submit an application for a building permit to construct the approved site improvements. However, should you not desire this option, then a letter of request must be submitted requesting a maximum of a one-year time extension. The letter must state the reason(s) for the time extension request (good cause - see Section 4-407). The request for a time extension must be approved/denied by the CDB during the time period the Development Order is still valid (meaning by at least the March 20, 2007, CDB meeting). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [ma ilto: Doreen@ northsideeng ineeri ng.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:10 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Housh Ghovaee; Steve Page Subject: Clearwater Grande Hi Wayne, Quick question. The extended development order on the above project is going to expire in March. Do I have to go to CDB for a 1 year extension? If so, do I just need to send you a letter? Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727-443-2869 / Fax: 446-8036 / Cell: 235-8474 Email: doreen(D-northsideengineering.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.4 10 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/620 - Release Date: 1/8/2007 1/9/2007 J' CITY OF C L EARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT ??°/? ?Po s-i- Omit,; Box 4748, Ct.t:nt;\vn:r Ft.c>iiinn 33755-47?1i .'VTEa4? NIIINICII'AL SI7tvlcii5 13unInN<:, 1.00 Soirni Mvirn.r AVENUL, CLEARWATER, Ft()RII)n 3,3756 I'rLrl'nc.)NI: (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 loo(; RANGE. PLANNING DNELOPMEN-r RI viim August 30, 2006 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: FLD2005-07072 - 645 - 655 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Williams: On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted undercurrent Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 6.3 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 6.8 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 17.6 feet (to open stairs) and from 20 feet to 8.8 feet (to pool deck), an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 99.5 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (September 20, 2006). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On August 23, 2006, you submitted a request for a six-month time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited the problem of delays due to the architects producing very detailed plans and changes to the systems and interior design of the project. F l1 Uh I Illgt\Ill , ::\LUl I; IunN IC( a %,I .wo. Io r, I I„1'I I h\tn wu , (.,,r\, 11 \11 %I 11.H; B11 LJ()N-()N, C, 11 ),.11 \11.\Ml K ® ( \rI I \A. I'I I1-N',PN. I ?,,I M II \11 %110T "li„I nI I:?mI, n>rn? r nNl, At virmAI1\! At I I„N I•:,\IPIC,IUR" August 30, 2006 Williams - Page Two Since the approval of this project, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: 1. The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per unit. This project was approved with 108 parking spaces for 68 attached dwelling units, at a parking ratio of 1.59 parking spaces per dwelling unit. 2. The requirement for parapet height for buildings with flat roofs has been amended to a maximum of 42-inches. The project was approved with a parapet height of 11.5 feet (from roof deck). 3. Section 6-109.B was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. In considering the above changes to the Code and Beach by Design, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension to March 20, 2007, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 645 - 655 South Gulfview Boulevard. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within. the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, -? ' :- Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: Tlanning Dc parlmentlC D KIFLEX (FI:D)Itaaclive or Finished Applications IGulfview S 0645 - 0655 Clearwater Grande Condos #2("l)- IpprovedlGdfviewS655Time Exl.Dev.Order 8.30.06.doc __ • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Doreen Williams [Doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:25 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Clearwater Grande FLD2005-07072 Wayne, see attached letter requesting DO extension Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727-443-2869 / Fax: 446-8036 / Cell: 235-8474 Email: doreen@northsideengineering.com Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/401 - Release Date: 7/26/2006 8/23/2006 ?J r -0) Engineering Services, August 23, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-07072 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard Clearwater Grande - 450 Dear Mr. Wells: 0 CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL Inc. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board granted approved of the above FLD case. The Development Order will expire on September 20, 2006. At this time, we would like to request for six month extension to March 19, 2007. The developer has been working diligently with the architects to produce very detailed plans, which will save time through building permitting. Also, due to changes to the systems and interior design, delays have arisen. We look forward to hearing from you favorably. Sincerely, Doreen A. Williams Doreen A. Williams Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER_ FLORIDA 33755 -FECI I@NORTHSII)El,'NG [NEERING. COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 h 1 m t? a7 sT 1?'tv.Y',s?' p r n a.` r I?'?rwfY (`i LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 0 9 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 September 30, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-07072 - 645 - 655 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Ghovaee:. This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 6.3 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 6.8 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 17.6 feet (to open stairs) and from 20 feet to 8.8 feet (to pool deck), an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 99.5 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and the City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; BRIAN J. AUNGS'r, MAYOR-COMMISSIONGR Hoyr HAMILTON, VICE. MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK H114BARD, COMMISSIONER BiuJONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIvr, ACTION EMPLOYER" • September 30, 2005 Ghovaee - Page 2 • 3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 4. That any future signage meet the requirements of Code and any freestanding sign be a monument- style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 5. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 6. That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 8. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be amended to indicate the water feature adjacent to the ramp to the first level and berming toward the south driveway, coordinate landscaping with utilities between the ramp and front property line and to correct the number of plants in various areas of the landscape plan; 9. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 10. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 11. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; and 12. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval: Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-5023 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending 4 • September 30, 2005 Ghovaee - Page 3 the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director S. (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicationsIGiiljview S0645 - 0655 Clearwater Grande Condos #2 (T) - ApprovedIGulfview S 655 Development Order.doc FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: O?Mry- S Q_ -rA / J' otIVfI) 1 A10-11N FAX: 4 (p Z- O 3 U l +Q- I/ Phone: - IiI - Z'b FROM: -V ? 11 S Phone: )7 Z-' DATE:_ I' 0s RE: P ZO0.2' • 07072- ? 1??? ?,,a X31 ? a MESSAGE: -r M o. NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 6 IMILE 94468036 START TIME USAGE T Sep.20 09:18AM 02'58 • Sep. 20 2005 09:21AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 E MODE PAGES RESULT SND 08 OK r TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #t04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). I Sep. 20 2005 09:14AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94620365 Sep.20 09:11AM 03'12 SND 08 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX 0435-73291. i Message is 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 2:27 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2005-07072 (645-655 S. Gulfview) The proposed conditions of approval are acceptable to the applicant and we would like to be on the consent agenda. Have you received any letters in opposition? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 9/19/2005 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 3:12 PM To: 'lindac@jpfirm.com' Subject: Staff Reports Linda - Attached are the Staff Reports for the following cases scheduled for the September 20, 2005, CDB meeting at 10:00 am: 1. FLD2005-07072 - 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard 2. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - 691 South Gulfview Boulevard 3. FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Please let Ed Armstrong know that the attached Staff Report for 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard has been modified from an earlier version I sent to him the other day. Wayne CEi? a9 WI Gulfview S 655 Gulfview S 691 Gulfview S 401-421 Staff Report.do... Staff Report.do... Staff Repor... Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 3:54 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: Staff Reports for September 20 CDB meeting Doreen - Attached are Staff Reports for FLD2005-07070, 706 Bayway Blvd, and FLD2005-07072, 645-655 S. Gulfview Blvd, scheduled for the September 20, 2005, CDB meeting at 10:00 am. Wayne Bayway 706 Staff Gulfview S 655 Report.doc Staff Report.do... ENGELHARDT, HAMMER & ASSOCIATES Planning • Engineering • Landscape Architecture TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Wayne Wells FROM: Ethel Hammer DATE: September 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Community Development Board Cases FLD2005-07068, FLD2005- 07072, FLD2005-06057 CC: Ed Armstrong ? Herewith 0 Under separate cover DESCRIPTION Dear Mr. Wells, Via courier 0 Hand delivered At the direction of Ed Armstrong, representative for the above mentioned Flexible Development Applications, Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates has been asked to submit our analysis of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code criteria pertaining to these cases to allow for advance review by the Board. Please find enclosed (15) copies of said analysis for each case to distribute to all Community Development Board Members and other interested parties prior to the September 20, 2005 Community Development Board Hearing. We hope this will aid in the comprehensive review process. Should you require anything else or have any questions, please feel free to contact me at the number below. Sincere) 1J 1 L? FS P 1 3 2009 Ethel Hammer PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C17" CLEARWATER 5444 Bay Center Drive, Suite 122, Tampa, FL 33609, Telephone 813 282-3855, Fax 813 286-2308 • C Mu LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW • PLA-1\1NIWG DFp?i} T i?/tENT LOST IOFFIU: 'fox 4748, VLEARWATER "i.ORIDA 33758-4748 `ICIPAL SERVICES B1JILDENG, 1013 SOUTH NTYRTLE,`WENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 August 24, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-07072) Dear Mr. Ghovaee: The Case No. FLD2005-07072 for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 6.3 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 6.8 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 17.6 feet (to open stairs) and from 20 feet to 8.8 feet (to pool deck), an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 99.5 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, for property located at 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on September 20, 2005. The meeting will take place at 10:00 a.m. (note time of meeting) in the City Council Chambers, 31-d floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III S. (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Wending cased Up for the next CDBIGulfview S 645-655 Clearwnter Grande (7) - 9.20.05 CDR - WWIGulfview S 655 CDR Letter.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR Biu.Jor,so, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DO,-\N, COUNCILMEMB R HOYr HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PEI(?RsEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPI.OYMF.Nr AND ArFIRN1XM,I: AC'rIo`J EiMPLO)TR, "Oriftside August 9, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater - Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: FLD2005 - 655 S. Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater Grande DRC Response Dear Mr. Wells: I? ORIGINAL CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • Listed below please find our responses to the August 4, 2005 DRC comments. Engineering: 1. Prior to building permit, a separate right-of-way permit will be obtained. 2. Required ductile iron pipe will be installed and is indicated on Sheet C4.1. 3. Acknowledged, letter of authorization for construction within Progress Energy easement will be provided prior to building permit. Environmental: Fire: 1. Due to the site constraints, in addition to the irregular shape of the lot there is insufficient area to provide a pond. To make the best use of this site an underground vault has been designed and proposed. 2. An oil and grease trap separator or comparable treatment system to capture auto pollutants will be provided. 3. Details and cross-section of vault attached. 4. See attached vault maintenance schedule. 1. Acknowledge, fire has not approved or reviewed any construction plans or documents other than site work. 2. Acknowledge building is a High Rise Building. Design includes Fire Pump (electric), Standby power, emergency generator, sprinkler system (NFPA 13) with control valve and water flow device each floor and Class 1 Standpipe system each floor, Fire Alarm w/ voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station (Fire command Room), firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking, Elevator Lobbies. 3. The building is fully protected with NFPA 13 automatic sprinkler system. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N@MI N DSPRI NG.COM N ESTECH®MI N DS PRI NG.COM 727 • 443 - 2869 FAX 727 - 446 - 8036 ? ORIG A 4 The building will have an automatic standpipe system complying with NFPA 70, with fire pump providing minimum of 100psi at roof. 5 Fire Protection Engineer will provide fire flow calculation to ensure adequate water supply. Land Resources: 1. Tree staging area will be provided to allow suggested retention of palms. Additionally, suggested palms will be replanted on site. Landscaping: 1. Sheet C 1.1 has been revised to correctly indicate no interior greenspace area required. 2. Sheet C2.1 has been revised to correctly depict the 20' x 20' sight triangles for the eastern driveway and an additional deviation is being requested. for the small portion of the building that falls within the triangle. 3. See Sheet L1.1 for revised plant material. 4. See Sheet L1.1 for corrected Landscape Table 5. Sheet Ll.l has been revised and the landscaping under the ramp has been removed. 6. See Sheet L1.1 7. See Sheet L1.1 for planting not obstructing the utilities Parks and Recreation: ' D r (y ' ' € s 1. Impact fees to be paid prior to issuance of building permit. ? nnR ' AS Stormwater: LCO?,r 1. Treated runoff will discharge through the control structure. E.- 2. Vault is for treatment only PLANNING 6 L),_ 3. Detail added. ?- CITY cif. ("L- 4. - kecovery analysis is provided with the Stormwater Report. Solid Waste: 1. Dumpster staging area has been provided for four dumpsters and two recycle bins. Traffic Engineering: 1 Minimum clear height at parking garage entrance, exit, and throughout the parking areas will be 8'-2" or more. 2. See Sheet C2.1 for turning template, vehicle will not encroach into opposing lane. 3 Sightlines will be maintained with strategically placed mirrors as required. 4 Handicapped parking spaces are located on accessible route and adjacent to main entry of building. 5 Gate is horizontal acting rolling gate with keypad/card access at garage entrance and motion sensor activator at garage exit. 2 • • ORIGINAL 6 Elevator lobbies have been arranged to allow indirect entrance into garage area. Mirrors will be placed to provide traffic visibility. 7. See Sheet C3.1 for location pavement markings and directional vehicular signage. 8. See Sheet C3.1 for required stop bar at base of down ramp on ground floor. Planning: 1 Recorded deed submitted. 2 All outdoor lighting fixtures shown on Sheet C3.1 3 Sight triangles shown on Sheet L1.1 4 On Sheet C L I the Site Data Table has been revised to indicate 30 dwelling units per acre under "Required" "Density". 5 Revised Exhibit A corrected to indicate 91 rooms to be razed under this permit. 6 Sheet C 1.1 has been revised to show proposed building height at 99.33 feet. 7 Calculation of parking spaces based upon current code, proposal meets code requirements. 8. Sheet C 1.1 Revised to indicate location of handicap parking spaces on the second floor. 9. Storage units on Ground Floor will be limited to storage only, complying with FEMA rules and guidelines, and will be "break away" construction. Restrictions of use will be embodied in Condominium Documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions, etc. and submitted to Building Official prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 10 Sea Turtle friendly lights will be used on site and compliance demonstrated in a form acceptable to the Environmental Division. 11 Signage will be monument type sign not exceeding 4' in height, designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building. 12. Acknowledge 13: Condition acknowledged 14. Condition acknowledged 15. Prior to issuance of any permits a Unity of Title will be recorded. 16. Acknowledged. 17. Acknowledged, all Fire Department requirements will be met prior to issuance of permit. 18. Traffic Impact fees will be paid prior to issuance for CO 19. Park and Recreation fees will be paid prior to issuance of CO 20 Scott Rice with Traffic Engineering stated at DRC he has no objection to proposed loading zone. 21. Drive Aisle revised to 24'. 22. All sheets revised and coordinated relating to the location of the rear stairs over the pool equipment room. 23. A water feature has been added adjacent to the ground floor pedestrian entrance to the parking garage. A balustrade has been added at the top of the ramp adjacent to the new water feature. 24. FEMA requirements allow storage in the VE zone if within the specified restrictions of size and construction. D f (? `, !r # . ??. - 25. Acknowledged, the pool deck area has been reduced in size. ATUI 1 Z? 1 s + j 26. Dumpster Staging Area has been modified to stage four dumpsters and two recycle bins. Screen enclosure has been added to design. 27. Elevations and floor plans have been corrected to show the elements on the rear of the building. 28. Acknowledge and provided. 29. Front elevation of the building has been redesigned and coordinated with the floor plans. 30. See revised Exhibit A 31. See revised Exhibit A 32. See revised Exhibit A 33. See revised Exhibit A 34. See Revised Exhibit A 35. See Revised Exhibit A 36. See Revised Exhibit A 37. See Revised Exhibit A 38. See Revised Exhibit A 39. See added Justification for Termination of Status of Nonconformity. 40. Revisions have been made to the elevations to offer more changes/breaks in the elevations. 41. A water feature has been provided adjacent to the ground Floor pedestrian entrance to the Garage. In addition, there are reflecting pool. features immediately adjacent to the front wall/overhang on the First Floor. 42. See 41 above 43. Aluminum picket fence and gates are provided surrounding the pool area. 44. See Sheet C3.1 for change relating to Fire Lane location. 45. Architect revised elevation drawings 46. Architectural and Engineering drawings coordinated regarding ground level of - garage- 4 No-rlhside 5"&" smaa 1,00 CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: August 11, 2005 To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: Clearwater Grande NES Proj# 0450 We Transmit: X Enclosed Under Separate Cover Mail UPS Overnight Pick-Up X Hand Delivered 7-1 1J AUS 1 1 2033 f _Y 611_ X Originals X Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications ,-, _" , Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: File N. Pelzer A. Haines By. Doreen Williams, Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N@MI N D5 PRI NG.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 L 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 1:51 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: Revised Draft DRC comments re FLD2005-07072, 655 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - Attached are the REVISED Draft DRC comments for this case. Planning comment #24 changed. Wayne draft 8.4.05 dre action agenda... 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 12:59 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: Draft DRC comments for FLD2005-07072, 655 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the DRC meeting on August 4, 2005, at 2:00 pm. Wayne ' ('w draft 8.4.05 dre action agenda... LL CITY OF CLE RWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM July 12, 2005 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, Fl 33755 RE: FLD2005-07072 -- 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07072. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 04, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, t' /1. lid Wayn ells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-07072 - 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 4:27 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07072, 645-655 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - Letter of Completeness attached. Original being mailed. Wayne r letter of ,mpleteness 7.12.05 Horthside 5"i&"'5Mx&a loco July 6, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-07072 - 655 S. Gulfview Blvd. Dear Mr. Wells: Listed below are our responses to the Letter of Incompleteness. S CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • R ECEIVED 1111 11 -11n5 zuu PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER OR IGINAL 1. Attached is the recorded deed. 2. All sidewalks, are shown and dimensioned. All setbacks are noted. See Sheet C3.1, Sheet C 1.1 and corrected narrative. 3. See Sheet C3.1 for proposed grades for pool deck and brick pavers. 4. See Architectural sheets. 5. Site data table has been corrected in regards to vehicular paved area. See Sheet C1.1. 6. See architectural plan. 7. Outdoor lighting has been located. See Sheet C3.1. 8. See architectural plans for overhead dimensions. 9. See revised sheet L1.1 for site visibility triangles. 10. See sheet C3.1 for curbing at landscaped areas. All corrected drawings and revised narratives are enclosed. Sincerely, Wil lams L 4 Project Director Enc. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N@MI N DSPRI NG.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:40 AM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07072, 655 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - Letter of incompleteness attached. While not included, your title block indicates "Clearwater Grande Hotel." Since it is to be no longer a hotel, you may want to change the title block (architect just called it "Clearwater Grande"). Original being mailed. Wayne letter of completeness 7.7.0. LL CITY OF CLE*RWATER ° Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARW ATER. C OM July 07, 2005 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, F133755 RE: FLD2005-07072 -- 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07072. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. P Deed submitted is unrecorded. Submit recorded deed. 2. Show sidewalks, including the width of the sidewalks, from stairwells to the public sidewalk in S. Gulfview Blvd. Show setback from side property lines to the sidewalks. J3. Provide proposed grades for the pool deck/brick pavers on the south side of the project on Sheet C3.1. J4. Provide on Sheets A400, A401, A402 & A403 the height of parapets and the elevator overruns from the roof slab to the top of parapet/elevator. 15. It is stated in the site data table on Sheet C 1.1 there is 4,174 square feet of vehicular use area. Recheck your calculations, only including those areas outside of the building. If required, depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped / areas ?6. Show the location of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening. If on roof, indicate such in a note or provide a rooftop plan. ,/7. Show the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. ?8. Dimension on Sheets A301, A302 & A307 and/or A400, A401, A402 & A403 the distance the overhangs and balconies are from the face of the building (into the required setbacks). ®9 Show on Sheet L1.1 all sight visibility triangles. 10. Curb all landscaped areas (eastern driveway, edge of loading space and edge of drive into building on north side). Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by noon, July 11, 2005 (one original and 14 copies of all revised application material). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne. Wells@myclearwater.com. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-07071- 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD 0 CITY OF CLEORWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. C OM July 07, 2005 Sincerely yours, w? M . u" te,Wells Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-07072 - 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD Norinside • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING 0 ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ORIGINAL Date: July 1, 2005 To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst ; City of Clearwater Planning Department ' 2005 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 111 - t L_.. Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: Cleanvater Grande NES Proj# 0450 We Transmit: X Enclosed Under Separate Cover X Originals Mail UPS Overnight X Prints Pick-Up X Hand Delivered Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Comments: r'or Design Review Committee for today's deadline. Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies To: File N. Pelzer A. Haines By: 601 CLEVELAND CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N@MI N DSPRI N6.COM N ESTECH@MI N DSPRI N6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 0 s MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP VJ ?AW Planner III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005-07072 - 645 - 655 South Gulfview Boulevard DATE: January 11, 2007 Attached is information related to the request by Doreen Williams of Northside Engineering Services, Inc., on behalf of Clearwater Grande Holdings, L.L.C., for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 645 - 655 South Gulfview Boulevard. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on March 20, 2008. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted a six-month extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per unit. This project was approved with 108 parking spaces for 68 attached dwelling units, at a parking ratio of 1.59 parking spaces per dwelling unit. The requirement for parapet height for buildings with flat roofs has been amended to a maximum of 42-inches. The project was approved with a parapet height of 11.5 feet (from roof deck). Section 6-109.B was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order August 30, 2006 Maps and Photos S: I Planning Department) C D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending cases) Up for the next CDBI Gulfview S 0645 - 0655 Clearwater Grande Condos #2 (7) - Approved -1.10.07 CDBIGu yview S 655 Time Extension Memorandum for 1.20.07 CDB.doc 0 0 ORIGINAL CDB Meeting Date: September 20, 2005 Case Numbers: FLD2005-07072 Agenda Item: G10 Owner/Applicant: Clearwater Grande Development, LLC Representative: Mr. Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Address: 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density -(91- existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 6.3 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 6.8 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 17.6 feet (to open stairs) and from 20 feet to 8.8 feet (to pool deck), an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 99.5 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District; Residential Facilities High (RFH) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 1.437 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodation use of 91 rooms/units with accessory restaurant Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (68 condominiums) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Tourist District; Miniature golf and retail sales LAND USES: East: Tourist District; Attached dwellings South: Open Space/Recreation and Preservation Districts; Water West: Tourist District; Overnight accommodation use Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2605-07072 -Page 1 of 10 CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is tourist-dominated area with a mixture of attached dwellings (condominium), overnight accommodation uses and tourist-oriented commercial uses. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.437 acres is located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 1,200 feet west of Gulf Boulevard. The site has 248 feet of frontage on South Gulfview Boulevard. The site is currently developed with the five-story, 91- room Quality Inn overnight accommodation use. The existing building is located on the east side of the site and oriented north/south. Parking is presently located over the western two-thirds of the property. Properties to the west are developed with overnight accommodation uses. The parcel to the east is developed with an attached dwelling building of 12 stories. Properties to the north between South Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard are commercial uses oriented toward tourists. Properties north of Bayway Boulevard are, or have been approved for, attached dwellings. On March 22, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved Case No. FLD2004- 12088 with 11 conditions for this site, which included the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density for the existing 91-room/unit hotel on the property for the construction of a new overnight accommodation use of 91 rooms/units (Clearwater Grande Hotel). Proposal: The proposal includes the complete demolition of all existing site improvements for the existing five-story, 91-room/unit Quality Inn and the construction of a new 11-story residential building of 68 dwelling units. The new building proposes an east/west orientation with limited parking outside of the building. All proposed parking is structured parking within the first two floors of the building. The existing deck and dock south of the seawall is proposed to be removed. The proposal includes a request to Terminate the Status of the Nonconformity for the nonconforming density for the existing 91-room/unit overnight accommodation use on the property. Based on current Land Use Category density limitations of 30 units/rooms per acre for dwellings, the overall subject site may be redeveloped with a maximum of 43 dwelling units. The applicant is requesting to terminate the nonconforming density in order to demolish the existing overnight accommodation use and rather now build a new residential building with 68 dwelling units, based on a 40/30 conversion factor. Under the Termination of Status of Nonconformity provisions, there are four required improvements: 1. Installation of perimeter buffers. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Improvement of off-street parkin lots. The applicant is removing all existing improvements and is providing parking that exceeds Code provisions in the two levels of the parking garage. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07072 - Page 2 of 10 • 0 3. Removal of nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures. The applicant is removing all existing improvements. Any future signage will need to meet current Code provisions. 4. Use of Comprehensive Sig Program and Comprehensive Landscape Programs to satisfy requirements. The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available under the Code to residential properties. The Comprehensive Landscape Program is unnecessary. The Code provisions of Sections 6-109.B and C require Level Two approval of the Termination of Status of Nonconformity and reconstruction complying with all other Code requirements. The proposal is to demolish the existing overnight accommodation use and construct a residential building with 10 living floors over ground level parking (there is some parking provided on the first level, see discussion below). The site has been designed with the building meeting the required front (north - 15 feet) and side (east and west - 10 feet) setbacks. The proposal includes a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 6.3 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 6.8 feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to ,18 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 17.6 feet (to open stairs) and from 20 feet to 8.8 feet (to pool deck). With regard to the side setback reduction along the east and west sides for sidewalks, by Building Code requirements, the egress stairs near the east and west sides of the building must be provided with a sidewalk out to the sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard rights-of-way. These sidewalks do not extend the entire distance along the east and west sides of the building, and therefore provides adequate planting area for landscaping. With regard to the rear setback reductions proposed along the south property fine, the reduction for the building is to two corners of the building on the west side of the site. The majority of the building greatly exceeds the required 20-foot rear setback requirement, due to the orientation of the building on the site and the triangulation of the south property line. The proposed rear setback to the building meets the Building Code setback requirement of at least 18 feet from the seawall. While the rear setback reduction for the open stairs to 17.6 feet has been advertised, technically these stairs meet Code requirements. Section 3-908.C allows open stairs to project no more than three feet (or in this case to a minimum of 17 feet) into a required setback. The final rear setback reduction requested deals with the proposed pool, with the pool deck at a rear setback of 8.8 feet. The actual pool is proposed at a rear setback of 18 feet, which complies with the Building Code requirement of 18 feet (due to the location of the deadmen for the seawall). The existing overnight accommodation pool and pool deck is located in the same location as this proposed pool and pool deck. There do exist wood decks on this property that are at a zero setback (proposed to be removed). Current development practices generally place the pool area at the rear of the property, which is the most private area of the property, with the pool deck at, or close to, a zero setback. This proposed pool area is consistent in location and setback as the adjacent pool to the east for Continental Towers. The requested flexibility in regard to required setbacks are justified by the benefits to an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area and to the City as a whole for both buildings and landscaping. The proposal includes the provision of a minimum of 15 feet of landscaped area along South Gulfview Boulevard, meeting the setback requirements. A water feature is proposed between the Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07072 - Page 3 of 10 r • ramp and the front property line near the highest point of the ramp to provide visual interest, as well as berming toward the south driveway. The landscape plan does not properly indicate this water feature next to the ramp, nor the berm. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan will need to be amended to show this water feature and berm, as well as correcting the number of plants indicated in various areas on the landscape plan. The site will be heavily landscaped within the front and side setback areas. Landscaping between the ramp and front property line will need to be coordinated with proposed utilities, with the landscape plan being amended prior to the issuance of any permits. The building will have four refuse collection rooms on the ground floor within the parking garage. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The trash staging area is located adjacent to. the northern driveway and the building, next to the entrance to the ground level parking garage. The proposal is to construct a new building of 11-stories at a height increase to 99.5 feet to the roof deck. This height complies with the Tourist District and Beach by Design. The Continental Towers Condominiums to the east is a 12-floor building also oriented east/west, at approximately the same height as this proposal. The Econo Lodge overnight accommodation use to the west is five floors. The Sunspree project at 715 South Gulfview Boulevard to the east has been approved by the CDB with two residential buildings, each at a height of 150 feet. The proposal includes an additional 11.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck). The tops of the elevator towers are proposed 16 feet above the roof deck (the maximum permitted by Code). The increased parapets are in the center of the building on the north and south sides of the building, do not extend to the east and west ends of the building and are to provide visual interest to the building. The proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses, consistent in use with the attached dwellings to the east and in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage and character of adjacent properties. The proposed building is designed with Mediterranean architecture. The location of the building "tower" on the site is similar to that previously approved under FLD2004-12088 in March 2005. This proposal includes two wings projecting from the north side of the building toward South Gulfview Boulevard on the east and west ends. These wings are six stories in height (over ground level parking). The building is also stepped back on the ninth residential floor (over ground level parking) from the east and west building edges. The main lobby, meeting room, fitness center, resident climate controlled storage units, condominium party and game lounge are planned on the first floor, as well as four dwellings.of generally 2,100 or 2,400 square feet in area. Floors 2 - 6 will have eight dwellings per floor, with units 2,300, 2,400 or 2,600 square feet in area. Floors 7 - 8 will have six dwellings per floor, with units 2,300, 2,400 or 4,300 square feet in area (the end units are the larger units). Floors 9 - 10 will have six dwellings per floor, with units 2,300, 2,400 or 2,555 square feet in area. All dwellings will have three bedrooms (some may be shown as studies or media rooms), with the exception of the larger units on Floors 7 and 8 having four bedrooms. Dwellings will be accessed from private elevators. The north side of the building (viewable from South Gulfview Boulevard) is designed with egress balconies, providing access to four stairwells. All dwellings will have balconies on the south side of the building facing the water. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07072 - Page 4 of 10 0 0 The site today is nonconforming to the required number of parking spaces, as well as a number of these parking spaces are less than the Code width. This proposal provides parking on the ground and first floors. The proposal will provide a total of 108 parking spaces (1.588 spaces per unit). Eighty-four parking spaces are provided on the ground level under the building. A ramp from the northern driveway provides access to 24 parking spaces on the first floor. A driveway on the south side of the site is shown as an egress-only driveway, but is wide enough for two-way traffic flow. A triangular portion of the parking garage building north of the southern driveway is located within the sight visibility triangle, but is not anticipated to cause driver issues with vehicular or pedestrian visibility when exiting the site. The criteria for attached dwellings prohibit direct access to an arterial street. South Gulfview Boulevard is an arterial street. The site has no other means of street access and the proposal provides driveway access to it, much as the existing overnight accommodation use presently has a driveway to access this site. A new sidewalk 10 feet in width will be constructed within the right-of-way along South Gulfview Boulevard. This sidewalk should be constructed consistent with the standards developed for the Beach Walk improvements in terms of design and landscaping. The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. It is noted that the Code does not provide the ability to request a Comprehensive Sign Program for a residential property. Future signage will need to meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign would need to be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 803.C) have been met. . Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07072 - Page 5 of 10 • E COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 68 dwelling units (a) X* DENSITY (40 rooms/units per acre; 30 dwelling units per acre) (57 rooms/units or 43 dwellings maximum IMPERVIOUS 0.85 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (0.95 LOT AREA (5,000 - 1.437 acres; 62,620 square feet X 10,000 s q. feet) LOT WIDTH (50-100 247.98 feet X feet) FRONT SETBACK 15 feet (to building) X (0-15 feet) REAR SETBACK 18 feet (to building), 17.6 feet (to open X* (10-20 feet stairs) and 8.8 feet (to pool deck) SIDE SETBACK East; 10 feet (to building); 6.3 feet (to X* (0-10 feet) sidewalk) West: 10 feet (to building); 6.8 feet (to sidewalk) HEIGHT (35-100 feet 100 feet (to roof deck) X* maximum) PARKING SPACES 108 spaces X 0.5 spaces per unit; 102 spaces required) (a) Includes the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for 91 existing overnight accommodation rooms/units, to be converted on a 40/30 ratio to 68 dwelling units. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07072 - Page 6 of 10 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.0: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances 'the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07072 - Page 7 of 10 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 1.437 acres is located within the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is for a 91-room hotel (which is nonconforming to current density maximums of 57 rooms or 43 dwelling units); 3. The proposal includes the demolition of the existing hotel building and all existing site improvements; 4. The proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity to allow the conversion of the 91 overnight accommodation units/rooms to 68 dwelling units; 5. The reduction to the rear setback to the building is for two corners of the building on the west side of the site. The majority of the building greatly exceeds the required 20-foot rear setback requirement, due to the orientation of the building on the site and the triangulation of the south property line; 6. Setback reductions otherwise are to non-building structures (sidewalks and pool deck); 7. The proposed building height of 99.5 feet is consistent with the height of the Continental Towers building to the east; 8. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development, and will enhance the character of the immediate vicinity; and 9. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density complies with the criteria of Section 6-109; 2. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913-and the other standards of the Code; 4. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 5. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 4, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development application to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 6.3 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 6.8 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 17.6 feet (to open stairs) and from 20 feet to 8.8 feet (to pool deck), an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 99.5 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07072 - Page 8 of 10 0 0 Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, for the site at 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; and criteria as a Comprehensive Infill in the Code including the General 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and the City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction', 3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 4. That any future signage meet the requirements of Code and any freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 5. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 6. That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 8. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be amended to indicate the water feature adjacent to the ramp to the first level and berming toward the south driveway, coordinate landscaping with utilities between the ramp and front property line and to correct the number of plants in various areas of the landscape plan; 9. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 10. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07072 - Page 9 of 10 11. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; and 12. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application Wayne M /Wells, AICP, Planner III S: Wlalning DepartmentlC D BTLEX (FLD)IPending casesWp for the new CDBIGulfview S 645-655 Clearwater Grande (T) - 9.20.05 CDB - WWIGulfview S 655 Staff Report. doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07072 - Page 10 of 10 wv, • 0 g P* 0 Ca+se•e? 8Na NRiOWMD O flpg7 87 T R " 7MRU rySt GVG"r WATER DR F*-T, 8r Q SAYSIDE PROJECT SITE C11 w V N ?` ?d Lam"" er s ? ? Ad s S O 0 4- C? o Location Map Owner: Clearwater Grande Development, LLC Case: FLD2005-07072 Site: 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 1.437 PIN: 17/29/15/05004/003/0080 Atlas Page: 285A Aerial Map Owner: Clearwater Grande Development, LIC; Case: Sid : 645-655 South C?vlfvlew Boulevard : Property ?iL.elAcr+?s}: PIN: FLD2005--07072 1.437 17/29/15/05C04/003/00-80 Atlas Page. I 285A • 0 P / f VJ hh Hw yy / /y) Cj j ? `/ ?/$ ry % 56/ ? t Q ad 1-t / - T N / ` wl ! t P Zoning Map Owner. I Clearwater Grande Development, LLC Case: FLD2005-07072 Site: 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 1.437 Size(Acres): PIN: 17/29/15/05004/003/0080 Atlas Page: 285A • C7 O //Se F e Overnight / h ed ac dmiinod ion do -? Outdoor e1h ?? e'Qh r Y #i me 561 en4ji 1 ?verBigitt 1 et it ;Qvelrni4 t /?-k ; y , - h , ' pcglmmod ti¢ s atoda0on Ret <q - ?- °'3f?1 Attached Y o^, ---dyvellings Overnight -J accommo us / L_ Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Clearwater Grande Development, LLC Case: FLD2005-07072 Site: 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 1 437 Size(Acres): . PIN: 17/29/15/05004/003/0080 Atlas Page: 285A 0 0 View looking southeast at subject property from South Gulfview Blvd. (Continental Towers in background) ? r? way 7 I 1 1W `_... View looking south at existing building separation between subject property and Continental Towers 645 - 655 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005-07072 View looking east at west side of subject property (Continental Towers in background) M View of commercial properties north of subject property (across South Gulfview Blvd.) Page 1 of 2 • View looking south at Econo Lodge property from South Gulfview Blvd. (to the north of subject property) C View looking west along South Gulfview Blvd (Shephard's in foreground) 645 - 655 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005-07072 C . "00,01M all .M 0-.- View looking north at Econo Lodge property from the beach (property north of subject property) View looking west along beach (Shephard's in center of photo) Page 2 of 2 % Fire Condition • Conditions Assoca i ' • ted With FLD2005-07072 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD James Keller 562-4327 07/29/2005 Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply Not Met Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/02/2005 9/12/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval. 8/2/05 - WW The landscape plan on Sheet L1.1 is not coordinated with the design of the vehicle ramp to the second floor parking area and the berming proposed (see Sheets A300 and A301). Landscape materials are proposed where the ramp will be constructed. Revise. 08/02/2005 9/12/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval. 8/2/05 - WW Coordinate proposed utilities in the front (water meter, BFP, FDC and FHA) with proposed landscaping to ensure landscaping will not interfere with these required improvements, nor be trampled during the normal reading of the meter or when uneventfully needed (FDC or FHA). Revise Sheet L1.1 to maintain adequate separation of devices and landscaping and potentially Sheet C3.1 to locate the FDC and FHA closer to the sidewalk/front property line. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 07/25/2005 Trees #47, 48 and 49 are highly valuable and recommend relocationg on site as well as other Not Met plam trees. Resolve prior to building permit. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 07/20/2005 Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if Not Met applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 07/21/2005 Please show how Solid Waste Dumpsters will be staged for collection, also where will recycling Not Met carts be located for the residents to utilize. 4chute rooms only enough room at staging area for 2 Dumpsters. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/02/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 08/02/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building Print Date: 09/12/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 2 I /I1 J FLD2005-07072 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition permits; Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/02/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 08/02/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 08/02/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 08/02/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 08/02/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 08/02/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 08/02/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all Fire Department requirements be met prior-to the issuance of any permits; 08/02/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 08/02/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. 08/02/2005 9/12/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval. 8/2/05 - WW Individual storage units are indicated on the ground floor on Sheets C2.1, C3.1, L1.1 and A300. Since the building is within the VE flood zone, storage may not allowed below BFE. Check with Development Services as to whether such is permitted and, if permitted, the design requirements for such. Print Date: 09/12/2005 CaseConditons Page 2 of 2 -7 D -7 Z- S, C? ,_. ? A 27 27sB r as y 0 7 0 9 .? CITY OF CLEARWATER - - •.? t0 1 ' ? P1Neuas couWrx naRmA `t' Q 1 1y t 5 16 ? 6WNA 7RSL71 ?6"RA '" P CTEARW s PREPARED BY mo ??? PUBIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 1 ?w1 CEI as/In ; '+ • t + to + ` ATSR aD PODIT TOWNHOUSE too 4 Nt 116 N le , ft 37756 Ph: (613)56:-e73Q ror. (Blj526-aSe ^I1 7'.9. y a 7 ?r , Q S 4 21 22 S P://,vwoleavola-Reamw'gh J ' Jar, ,•••.e• + 24 4 S 6 23 7 a 6 j ? + a3 a B? pp?? (? C'?oa' 1 ISLAND LA Dhcial.- Putelc Mfamolmn data 16 fufnlMee Dy the Cit of Clearwater 11 ? 2 ? 22 1 / N ? F cc 6 ` y Puall Wake AdrrN11nIa1M/EngMM and man ee ecaepled d ti 3 4 2 O ?7 OpNpO 20 4C4 lL-94 19 NN M b en aced 6Y the 1.00"M rich the underetanOMq Ihol the data retched wof eolMeted fa IM PurPaee at dsKlapMq o aophlc WO the wA/E o ti 3 S 6 a 17 1 ' fi T 7' . m tel, no varran tlesp ieprnsed a MIWieO ?conCemMq 1^, o!lwocy Ca^Pletcnees. rNbDYlly a w11006Ny of this data T 1 7 d r> 8 w 1 R L a S / ; wD . , a PWA/t y t aswrnae no Ibo61t alhermore, 1M Clly of gearwoler an h t -11 b q 14 6 y w e sw.er oeeaclolad with the use or .191366 of such data. ; ? / 10 11 G111TK1rli1 'r ?? F 7 12 i, y n 10 9 9 7 4 Mr w >A ? Y This Alm, Page is JV i- I. permdie eheagea. fa Mamolmn Ptwul blest reNSWre please call PWA/t a 4111 ow W il ar 1 COO , e w l. e-e to 17 to 1 y, s - ; •••°? N I? ''?•rn 9 0p t ?I /'? 1 as>t,rJJ a0_% 9 0 100 200 440 600 n v 4 SCALE: 1• . 400• a ?b 1 y? ? LEGEND: °'J °4 C/? O BLOCK NUMBER A i N 00 1234 LOT N ADDRESS T t+ oil. CITY LIMITS LINE --- { r i SHADED AREA - PROPERTY L•--J OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY I MD It ZONING DESIGNATION # a '4e ZONE LINE r . Atha[ Il i 7A Ol tee 05/07A7 Tro7 i SAND KEY COUNTY PARK OS/ y 23/01 I ` t ------------- REVISED: 03/08/99 ` ZONING ATLAS ,? I I r ? \ ? ? 94A NW 1/4 OF SECTION 285A 17 -29S-15E S 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 10:39 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-07072 - 655 S. Gulfview Wayne, Engineering received materials on Friday, Aug. 19, that resolved our comments on the subject case. Permit Plan has been updated. No specific approval conditions other than the normal conditions. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com • Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 2:47 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2005-07072 Zoning Map.doc Location Map.doc Existing Aerial Map.doc rrounding Uses Map Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 o -7 0 --7 Z- S, C-) ? - _ A 2 2768 ? f R, y 6 7 , .y CITY OF CLEARWATER - - , - - - - - " - 9 - ?- .? - - 10 n , - - - - - - i Pimi CONT"r WRIDA Jt a Y 'd t7 urm°e? P CIEARfATBR QIA PREPARED By g -' PUBLIC WO CWCADMINISTRATION 22/02 '•h f le POWT 20 Itq S Ypoe Me.. CYw.eIN.)rt 3375E g W3 502-4730. - ( ? ! o Sa5 7 ? 2 3 9 TO¦NNOUBB Q OY-60 ` s' 22 11 // Irs.H wwtw- (l an/ ? t4j r ?? •• ' ay f24 4 ? 6 0 ? ? 23 i 9lQ Wfele4nrt.: `. ?yY t 2 e 21 7 22 QED 6 PUNIC Nfamolkn dato to furelmM by tee Gty or Gewwter PuWk Nate bmMkl ll / l 3 ? at ' a0 cum E Oj 4C 1 0= re I:ng on neerNq, one muel to ottephe one uud Ey tM neblenl NIUI IM undwsl-0,9 Ieol the dolo lr fen•0 •of Caleeled for IM W d ' 4 y 4 . 1 1 ) PufpeM oPNq o gropNc M4eslruelure Nranlny, N surJl, lM Gty .70 Clnrraler PWA/T GR4 l I 6 > 7 6 `. ,; 16 a '? ff w S 16 t p I w 3 0 he o -my e-We lanem lN C! ENty w .1101,7ll?of this do to for any *U" Pwlkwer use. iwiMrmorh IM Coy of Geernoler hP 14 4 5 PWAA coo - no I10411y sMlsneref onodeled v1th the ufe 1J I i , b 6 3 w m1sum or such data. . l S 0 11 0 mNENT 12 a e 7 R To]. Allee Pege is .ae' to Pwlodk <Mnges. f r TOWERS a h ?rFw ? le s i R e, N ormolbn o0ou1 bled rMfknf Dlepfe coo PWA/E n rift ow ww ate. I CONDO R 17 is 11 /'1 I ?•4,s 2 ._0.?,2 F ` - 0 100 200 440 600 O iiij J i "?,r 6 1„ ?4A, - SCALE: 1' . 400' y LEGEND: yd,R'rtr t? O BLOCK NUMBER ,r Ca N 1234 LOT ADDRESS 07 ? ??-?- CITY LIMITS LINE SHADED AREA - PROPERTY a OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS ' 3 1 B A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX D ? E + CITY OWNED PROPERTY I MDXZONINO DESIGNATION d • ( +? O? 2 " J L ZONE LINE N T 1 r ? t III 1 ,? ? MaNt DOD p m 43ee 05107ie7 r I " 1 f j 11 SAND KEY COUNTY PARK 1j 11 I Os/R y Jts wl r Te `r? ?i•-•--- -? d C ,,,.?, t3D :Sp REVISED' r , j 1 ? r 1 I 03/08/99 ` 1 I 11 ZONING ATLAS ? 94A NW 1/4 OF SECTION 285A A 17 - 29S - 15 f • • 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 6:08 PM To: Kambourolias, Sam Subject: FLD2005-07072, 645-655 S. Gulfview Blvd. Sam - Could you please fix the north arrow on these maps. I have copied these from a prior case for this case and will fix the information at the bottom of each map and will redo the information on the Existing Uses map. The prior case that you have them under is FLD2004-12088. Thanks. Wayne Aerial Map.doc Existing Location Map.doc Zoning Map.doc rrounding Uses Map L J r ? Wells, Wayne From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 1:40 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2005-07072 - 655 S. Gulfview -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 3:56 PM To: Tefft, Robert Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Kinney, Jason Subject: FLD2005-07072 - 655 S. Gulfview Rob, Review o f the resubmittal for the subject has yielded several issues that must be resolved prior to scheduling this case for CDB: Traffic 2. Show turning template for a scaled vehicle onto ramp and out of ramp. Vehicle must not encroach into opposing lanes. 8/17/05 - NOT MET Stormwater 1. How is treated runoff to discharge from the vault? 8/17/05 - THE POND BOTTOM IS AT ELEVATION 3.5 WITH A DISCHARGE PIPE TO THE SEAWALL. SAND ELEVATIONS BEYOND THE SEAWALL ARE 5.8 TO 7.64 IN THE VICINITY OF THE PIPE OUTFALL. THERFORE, POSITIVE DRAINAGE IS NOT PROVIDED. 2. How is runoff in excess of treatment volume discharged from the site? 8/17/05 - NO OVERFLOW IS PROVIDED AND, AS DESIGNED, THE OUTFALL WOULD BE PLUGGED 4. Provide recovery analysis. 8/17/05 - CITY CRITERIA REQUIRES DRAWDOWN WITHIN 24-HOURS. CALCULATIONS INDICATE DRAWDOWN TIME OF 27.2 HOURS. Let me know if you have any questions. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com L L_J Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 2:00 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FW: FLD2005-07072 - 655 S. Gulfview Doreen - Need to address ASAP today. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 1:40 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2005-07072 - 655 S. Gulfview -----Original M essage----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 3:56 PM To: Tefft, Robert Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Kinney, Jason Subject: FLD2005-07072 - 655 S. Gulfview Rob, Review o f the resubmittal for the subject has yielded several issues that must be resolved prior to scheduling this case for CDB: Traffic 2. Show turning template for a scaled vehicle onto ramp and out of ramp. Vehicle must not encroach into opposing lanes. 8/17/05 - NOT MET Stormwater 1. How is treated runoff to discharge from the vault? 8/17/05 - THE POND BOTTOM IS AT ELEVATION 3.5 WITH A DISCHARGE PIPE TO THE SEAWALL. SAND ELEVATIONS BEYOND THE SEAWALL ARE 5.8 TO 7.64 IN THE VICINITY OF THE PIPE OUTFALL. THERFORE, POSITIVE DRAINAGE IS NOT PROVIDED. 2. How is runoff in excess of treatment volume discharged from the site? 8/17/05 - NO OVERFLOW IS PROVIDED AND, AS DESIGNED, THE OUTFALL WOULD BE PLUGGED 4. Provide recovery analysis. 8/17/05 - CITY CRITERIA REQUIRES DRAWDOWN WITHIN 24-HOURS. CALCULATIONS INDICATE DRAWDOWN TIME OF 27.2 HOURS. Let me know if you have any questions. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com 0 9 Wells, Wayne P From: Albee, Rick Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 12:37 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Cc: DRC Members Subject: RE: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB Revised and updated PP as needed. 655 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 1770 Drew- Conditions met. 401 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 342 Hamden- No Issues. 691 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 706 Bayway- No Issues. 475 East Shore- Condition met. 1460 Missouri- No Issues. 1200 Betty Ln- No Issues. 566 Bay Esplanade- Conditions met. 229 Coronado- Condition to be met at building permit. 621 Bay Esplanade- No Issues. 600 Pennsylvania- ?????? 1242 Cleveland- Revised condition to be met at building permit. -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:48 AM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB The following cases have been resubmitted from prior DRC meetings. Prior to being scheduled for the 9/20/05 CDB meeting agenda, please come by our office and review the following cases based on your comments on Permit Plan. If the revisions are acceptable, meaning that from your standpoint it may be scheduled for the CDB, or if there are still outstanding comments that would prevent it from being scheduled for CDB, please let the case planner know. Please review the following cases by end of the day tomorrow, August 17, 2005. Thanks. 655 S Gulfview Blvd FLD2005-07072 1770 Drew Street - FLD2005-06054 401 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-07068 342 Hamden Drive - FLD2005-07066 691 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-06057 706 Bayway Blvd - FLD2005-07070 .475 East Shore Drive - FLD2005-06056 1460 S Missouri Avenue - FLD2005-08039 1200 N Betty Lane - FLD2005-07063 566 Bay Esplanade Avenue - FLD2005-07065 229 Coronado Drive - FLD2005-07061 621 Bay Esplanade - FLD2005-07064 600 Pennsylvania Avenue - FLD2005-06055 1242 Cleveland Street - FLD20010058 0 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:48 AM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB The following cases have been resubmitted from prior DRC meetings. Prior to being scheduled for the 9/20/05 CDB meeting agenda, please come by our office and review the following cases based on your comments on Permit Plan. If the revisions are acceptable, meaning that from your standpoint it may be scheduled for the CDB, or if there are still outstanding comments that would prevent it from being scheduled for CDB, please let the case planner know. Please review the following cases by end of the day tomorrow, August 17, 2005. Thanks. J655 S Gulfview Blvd FLD2005-07072 1770 Drew Street - FLD2005-06054 401 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-07068 342 Hamden Drive - FLD2005-07066 691 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-06057 706 Bayway Blvd - FLD2005-07070 475 East Shore Drive - FLD2005-06056 1460 S Missouri Avenue - FLD2005-08039 1200 N Betty Lane - FLD2005-07063 566 Bay Esplanade Avenue - FLD2005-07065 229 Coronado Drive - FLD2005-07061 621 Bay Esplanade - FLD2005-07064 600 Pennsylvania Avenue - FLD2005-06055 1242 Cleveland Street - FLD2005-06058 N b 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD C FLD2005 07072 ase um er: - -- 2:00 m P Owner(s): Clearwater Grande Dev Llc ee a Gulf Blvd Ste 5 20001 India Indian Shores, F133785 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F1 33755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: nestech@mindspring.com Location: 1.437 acres located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 1,200 feet west of Gulf Boulevard. Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 16.6 feet (to open stairs) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535-2424, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 895 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 530-4517, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447-0290, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-441-8212, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: cpoint7@knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-442-0664, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: clwpt8@tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard, Rick Albee, Bill Buzzell Applicant/Rep: Doreen Williams, Ed Armstrong, Joe Burdette, Jeff Mendenhall, Lynn Beverly, Steve Page, Renee Ruggerio Other: Aaron Sharockman Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 42 The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Prior to building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the ROW of Gulfview Blvd. Contact Engineering at (727) 562-4750 in Room 220 at the Municipal Services Building. 2. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 3. Provide letter of authorization to authorize construction within Progress Energy easement. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are pernnttable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Fire: 1 . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2 . This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by both the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Building Code and Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . This building must be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. This building must be provided with an automatic wet standpipe with fire pump providing 100 psi at roof. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Trees #47, 48 and 49 are highly valuable and recommend relocationg on site as well as other plam trees. Resolve prior to building permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 43 1 . Sheet C1.1 - Witly 3407 square feet of vehicular use area, no interior greenspace area is required. Revise the Site Data table for "Proposed" "Parking Lot Interior Landscaping." 2. Sheet C2.1 - Revise the sight triangles for the eastern driveway to 20'x20'. If the building is located within the sight triangle, then the request will need to include this. 3 . Jatropha is specified as the shrub along the east, west and south sides of the property, including adjacent to the pool and pool/rear deck area. This plant is not salt tolerant and contains a milky sap that can irritate sensitive skin. All parts of the plant are reported to be poisonous if ingested. Since this site is adjacent to salt water and since it is proposed adjacent to an area where people will be recreating, it does not appear appropriate for use. Change to another plant. 4. Plants are specified on the landscape plan on Sheet L1.1 that are not listed in the Landscape Table, including: a. "PD" is specified along the east and west sides of the property; and b. "MJ" is specified within the front setback area in various locations. Dwarf Tricolor Jasmine and Yew podocarpus are specified in the Landscape Table, but cannot be located on the landscape plan. Revise. 5 . The landscape plan on Sheet L1.1 is not coordinated with the design of the vehicle ramp to the second floor parking area and the berming proposed (see Sheets A300 and A301). Landscape materials are proposed where the ramp will be constructed. Revise. 6. Sheet L1.1 - Indian hawthorn are specified on the west side (35) near the driveway and east side (38), but are shown to planted where the sidewalks from the rear deck and egress doors to the public sidewalk within South Gulfview Blvd. Revise. 7. Coordinate proposed utilities in the front (water meter, BFP, FDC and FHA) with proposed landscaping to ensure landscaping will not interfere with these required improvements, nor be trampled during the normal reading of the meter or when uneventfully needed (FDC or FHA). Revise Sheet L1.1 to maintain adequate separation of devices and landscaping and potentially Sheet C3.1 to locate the FDC and FHA closer to the sidewalk/front property line. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1. How is treated runoff to discharge from the vault? 2. How is runoff in excess of treatment volume discharged from the site? 3. Provide detail of filter system. 4. Provide recovery analysis. All of the above prior to CDB. Solid Waste: 1 . Please show how Solid Waste Dumpsters will be staged for collection, also where will recycling carts be located for the residents to utilize. 4chute rooms only enough room at staging area for 2 Dumpsters. Traffic Engineering: 1 . Vertical height clearance for parking garage must be 8'2" to accommodate handicap van per ADAAG (entrance, route, parking stall and exit). 2. Show turning template for a scaled vehicle onto ramp and out of ramp. Vehicle must not encroach into opposing lanes. 3. Walls must not impede parked motorists line of sight when backing out. 4. Handicap parking spaces must be strategically located near accessible entrance. 5. How does gate work? Show key pad or console to operate gate? Gate vertical clearance must be 8'2". 6. Provide continuation of sidewalk along the east and west elevator lobbies. 7. Install signage and pavement markings for better internal flow for motorists, i.e. one-way sign, do not enter sign, stop sign, and directional pavement arrows. 8. Provide stop bar at base of down ramp on ground floor. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 44 • • Deed submitted is unrecorded. Submit recorded deed. . Identify on the plans all outdoor lighting fixtures. 3 . Show on Sheet L1.1 all sight visibility triangles. 1 . Sheet C1.1 - Revise the Site Data table for "Required" "Density" to indicate 30 dwelling units per acre (43 units max.), since the proposal is for attached dwellings and not overnight accommodations. 5 . Revise the "Revised Exhibit A" to the application for "Description of Requests" to indicate 91 (not 93) rooms will be razed under this proposal. 6. Sheet C1.1 - Revise the "Proposed" "Building Height" from 99.75 feet to 99.33 feet. 1 . Recommend providing two parking spaces per unit. 3 . Sheet C1.1 - Revise "Proposed" "Parking" to indicate two handicap parking spaces are located on the second floor. 3 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 10. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental. Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 11 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 12 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 13 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 14. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 15 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 17 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 18 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 19. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. 20. Unclear why a loading space is being provided, since this is not a nonresidential use. Additionally, unclear how a truck would get out of this space, head first to exit to South Gulfview Blvd. 21 . Sheet C2.1 - Dimension the drive aisles on the east and west sides of the building on the ground floor between the stairs and the columns (dimensions to less than 24 feet). 22 . Rear stairs over the pool equipment room are shown different on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 than on Sheets A300 and A301. Coordinate and revise appropriate sheets. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 45 23 . Based on the turning movements exiting the second floor parking area, the fact that vehicles are exiting down a ramp and the front setback area is a landscape berm from the front property line to the ramp, from a safety standpoint, shouldn't at least the highest portion of the ramp have something higher than a six-inch curb to prevent a vehicle from accidentally going right down the berm? 24 . Individual storage units are indicated on the ground floor on Sheets C2.1, C3.1, L1.1 and A300. Since the building is within the VE flood zone, storage may not allowed below BFE. Check with Development Services as to whether such is permitted and, if permitted, the design requirements for such. 25 . Unclear why the pool/rear deck must be the size that it is proposed. This is a massive amount of brick pavers proposed. Either justify the enormity of this pool/rear deck or reduce in size (not supportive of the proposed deck size at this time). 26 . Since there are trash chutes and trash rooms planned where dumpsters will be stored until pickup days, and since a "dumpster staging area" has been provided adjacent to the building, unclear why the "dumpster staging area" is being designed to look like a dumpster enclosure with gates. Explain or remove the enclosure and gates. 27 . Sheet A401 - Provide greater clarity on the elevation as to the first floor party room windows and doors, as well as the exterior restrooms (see Sheet A301) and including the restrooms relationship to the second floor units (roof of restrooms- what will it look like?). 28 . Since the hotel proposal for this property was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on March 22, 2005 and now apparently is not to be constructed, discussion at the March CDB meeting was contentious regarding setbacks and building location. This may be expected again for this project. Therefore, it is highly recommended to indicate on the plans the location of the adjacent structures (east and west) and the heights of those adjacent structures. With the redesign and change in use for this proposal from the last proposal, it is also highly recommended to provide justification for the building location, setbacks and height. Provide whatever perspective drawings, view studies, etc. as part of your justification. 29. North elevation (Sheet A400) is not coordinated in design with the floor plans (A302 - A310) that indicates what amounts to double balconies providing "private" outdoor areas to bedrooms, yet with an outdoor "walkway" to get to the stairwells. Additional columns for the "walkway" balcony needs to be shown, as well as edges of walls beyond. This produces a front elevation inconsistent with the floor plans submitted. Revise. 30 . Revise Exhibit A "Description of Requests" to match that indicated by Staff. Ensure all portions of the "Requests" are justified within the responses to ALL appropriate General Applicability and Comprehensive Infrll criteria. 31 . Revise response to the General Applicability criteria #1 (Exhibit A) - There are only 91 existing units (not 93). Provide specific information as to HOW this proposal is in harmony with the scale, bulk, density and character of adjacent properties. Note: There are no buffers required in the Tourist District. 32 . Revise response to the General Applicability criteria #5 (Exhibit A) - Provide specific information as to HOW the proposal is consistent with the surrounding character. 33 . Revise response to the General Applicability criteria #6 (Exhibit A) - Provide specific information as to HOW this proposal minimizes any adverse visual effects on the adjacent properties (see prior comment also). 34 . Revise response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 (Exhibit A) - a. There are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District and, due to the sidewalks within the 10-foot setback area, this does not provide for the full 10-foot area for landscaping. b. Reductions to setbacks are only in the rear, where there is a reduction to building/structure. c. Provide specific information as to HOW the increase in height will not adversely impact adjacent or surrounding properties. d. Proposal is for attached dwellings, not a hotel. 35 . Revise response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 (Exhibit A) - Directions of ALL surrounding projects wrong. Ensure surrounding projects are within close proximity to this project. Provide information as to all aspects of compatibility with adjacent land uses (height is not the only indicator of compatibility). 36 . Revise response to the Comprehensive Infrll Redevelopment Project criteria #7 (Exhibit A) - Unclear of the statements of how this attached dwelling project is such that "all can enjoy" and "not limited to single-family owners." Speak to the criteria which is regarding the "form and function" of the proposal. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 46 + y 37 . Revise response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 (Exhibit A) - Response is insufficient justification as to how flexibility regarding setbacks and height benefits the community chararacter and the immediate vicinity and the City as a whole. A luxury condominium could be constructed without such flexibility. Explain how the elimination of the restaurant will "slow the traffic flow." 38 . Revise response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #9 (Exhibit A) - Parking exceeding Code requirements are only by six spaces, which represents a 0.088 increase over the required parking, which is not significant. 39 . Provide justification for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity regarding density for the following: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(D). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive. landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 40. Exhibit A - Beach by Design #2 - Unclear of the "step-backs" referred to, as there is only that in front of the building on the 7th Floor. Design does have a "box-like" appearance. 41 . Exhibit A - Beach by Design #3 - Unclear as to any proposed fountain. I haven't found one yet. 42 . Exhibit A - Beach by Design #4 - Unclear as to any waterfall feature. 1 haven't found one yet. 43 . Unclear as to proposed pool fencing. Advise/show on all appropriate sheets. 44 . Sheet C3.1 - In order to provide a greater area for the proposed landscaping and to minimize impacts of landscaping on proposed utilities, move the proposed fire line to the rear on the west side closer to the building. 45 . Perspective drawing on Sheet A100 - The prior project for this site approved on March 22, 2005, had greater movement and detailing of the facade as well as stepping of the building east to west. This proposal presents a more flat facade with less detailing, especially on the front facade, in the form of facade stucco treatments, columning, banding window detailing, arching, etc. (and no side stepping of the building). Unclear why some floor levels have railings which appear to be concrete balustrades but most with aluminum railings, which does not produce a cohesive appearance. 46 . The site plan on Sheet C2.1 and the architectural plans on Sheet A300 appear to indicate a solid wall around the ground-level parking garage, but the side elevations on Sheets A402 and A403 appear to have openings between the columns. Which is correct? Revise that which is incorrect. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 9/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 8/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 47 2.00 pm Case Number: FLD2005-07072 -- 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Clearwater Grande Dev Llc 20001 Gulf Blvd Ste 5 4,0 Indian Shores Fl 33785 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street chawook Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: nestech@mindspring.com Location: 1.437 acres located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 1,200 feet west of Gulf Boulevard. Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 16.6 feet (to open stairs) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535-2424, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 895 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 530-4517, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447-0290, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-441-8212, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: cpoint7@knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-442-0664, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: clwpt8@tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Blackburn Applicant/Rep: Housh Ghovaee, Doreen Williams, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 42 i General Engineering: • • 1 , Prior to building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the ROW of Gulfview Blvd. Contact Engineering at (727) 562-4750 in Room 220 at the Municipal Services Building. 2. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 3. Provide letter of authorization to authorize construction within Progress Energy easement. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Fire: Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. 1 . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2 . This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by both the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Building Code and Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . This building must be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. This building must be provided with an automatic wet standpipe with fire pump providing 100 psi at roof. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: No issues. Legal: No issues. Land Resources: 1 , Trees #47, 48 and 49 are highly valuable and recommend relocationg on site as well as other plam trees. Resolve prior to building permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 43 1 . Sheet C1.1 - Witly 3407 square feet of vehicular use area, no in erior greenspace area is required. Revise the Site Data table for "Proposed" "Parking Lot Interior Landscaping." 2 . Sheet C2.1 - Revise the sight triangles for the eastern driveway to 20'x20'. If the building is located within the sight triangle, then the request will need to include this. 3 . Jatropha is specified as the shrub along the east, west and south sides of the property, including adjacent to the pool and pool/rear deck area. This plant is not salt tolerant and contains a milky sap that can irritate sensitive skin. All parts of the plant are reported to be poisonous if ingested. Since this site is adjacent to salt water and since it is proposed adjacent to an area where people will be recreating, it does not appear appropriate for use. Change to another plant. 4. Plants are specified on the landscape plan on Sheet L1.1 that are not listed in the Landscape Table, including: a. "PD" is specified along the east and west sides of the property; and b. "MJ" is specified within the front setback area in various locations. Dwarf Tricolor Jasmine and Yew podoca.rpus are specified in the Landscape Table, but cannot be located on the landscape plan. Revise. 5 . The landscape plan on Sheet L1.1 is not coordinated with the design of the vehicle ramp to the second floor parking area and the berming proposed (see Sheets A300 and A301). Landscape materials are proposed where the ramp will be constructed. Revise. 6. Sheet L1.1 - Indian hawthorn are specified on the west side (35) near the driveway and east side (38), but are shown to planted where the sidewalks from the rear deck and egress doors to the public sidewalk within South Gulfview Blvd. Revise. 7. Coordinate proposed utilities in the front (water meter, BFP, FDC and FHA) with proposed landscaping to ensure landscaping will not interfere with these required improvements, nor be trampled during the normal reading of the meter or when uneventfully needed (FDC or FHA). Revise Sheet L1.1 to maintain adequate separation of devices and landscaping and potentially Sheet C3.1 to locate the FDC and FHA closer to the sidewalk/front property line. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . 1. How is treated runoff to discharge from the vault? 2. How is runoff in excess of treatment volume discharged from the site? 3. Provide detail of filter system. 4. Provide recovery analysis. All of the above prior to CDB. Solid Waste: I . Please show how Solid Waste Dumpsters will be staged for collection, also where will recycling carts be located for the residents to utilize. 4chute rooms only enough room at staging area for 2 Dumpsters. Traffic Engineering: I . Vertical height clearance for parking garage must be 87" to accommodate handicap van per ADAAG (entrance, route, parking stall and exit). 2. Show turning template for a scaled vehicle onto ramp and out of ramp. Vehicle must not encroach into opposing lanes. 3. Walls must not impede parked motorists line of sight when backing out. 4. Handicap parking spaces must be strategically located near accessible entrance. 5. How does gate work? Show key pad or console to operate gate? Gate vertical clearance must be 8'2". 6. Provide continuation of sidewalk along the east and west elevator lobbies. 7. Install signage and pavement markings for better internal flow for motorists, i.e. one-way sign, do not enter sign, stop sign, and directional pavement arrows. 8. Provide stop bar at base of down ramp on ground floor. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 44 1 . Deed submitted is unrecorded. Submit recorded deed. • 2. Identify on the plans all outdoor lighting fixtures. 3 . Show on Sheet L1.1 all sight visibility triangles. 4. Sheet C1.1 - Revise the Site Data table for "Required" "Density" to indicate 30 dwelling units per acre (43 units max.), since the proposal is for attached dwellings and not overnight accommodations. 5 . Revise the "Revised Exhibit A" to the application for "Description of Requests" to indicate 91 (not 93) rooms will be razed under this proposal. 6. Sheet C1.1 - Revise the "Proposed" "Building Height" from 99.75 feet to 99.33 feet. 7. Recommend providing two parking spaces per unit. 8 . Sheet C1.1 - Revise "Proposed" "Parking" to indicate two handicap parking spaces are located on the second floor. 9. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 10. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 11 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 12 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 13 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 14. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 15 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 17 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 18 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 19 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. 20 . Unclear why a loading space is being provided, since this is not a nonresidential use. Additionally, unclear how a truck would get out of this space, head first to exit to South Gulfview Blvd. 21 . Sheet C2.1 - Dimension the drive aisles on the east and west sides of the building on the ground floor between the stairs and the columns (dimensions to less than 24 feet). 22. Rear stairs over the pool equipment room are shown different on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 than on Sheets A300 and A301. Coordinate and revise appropriate sheets. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 45 23 . Based on the turning movements exiting the second floor parking arehe fact that vehicles are exiting down a ramp and the front setback area is a landscape berm from the front property line to the ramp, from a safety standpoint, shouldn't at least the highest portion of the ramp have something higher than a six-inch curb to prevent a vehicle from accidentally going right down the berm? 24 . Individual storage units are indicated on the ground floor on Sheets C2.1, C3.1, L1.1 and A300. Since the building is within the VE flood zone, storage may not allowed below BFE. Check with Development Services as to whether such is permitted and, if permitted, the design requirements for such. 25 . Unclear why the pool/rear deck must be the size that it is proposed. This is a massive amount of brick pavers proposed. Either justify the enormity of this pool/rear deck or reduce in size (not supportive of the proposed deck size at this time). 26 . Since there are trash chutes and trash rooms planned where dumpsters will be stored until pickup days, and since a "dumpster staging area" has been provided adjacent to the building, unclear why the "dumpster staging area" is being designed to look like a dumpster enclosure with gates. Explain or remove the enclosure and gates. 27 . Sheet A401 - Provide greater clarity on the elevation as to the first floor party room windows and doors, as well as the exterior restrooms (see Sheet A301) and including the restrooms relationship to the second floor units (roof of restrooms- what will it look like?). 28 . Since the hotel proposal for this property was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on March 22, 2005 and now apparently is not to be constructed, discussion at the March CDB meeting was contentious regarding setbacks and building location. This may be expected again for this project. Therefore, it is highly recommended to indicate on the plans the location of the adjacent structures (east and west) and the heights of those adjacent structures. With the redesign and change in use for this proposal from the last proposal, it is also highly recommended to provide justification for the building location, setbacks and height. Provide whatever perspective drawings, view studies, etc. as part of your justification. 29. North elevation (Sheet A400) is not coordinated in design with the floor plans (A302 - A310) that indicates what amounts to double balconies providing "private" outdoor areas to bedrooms, yet with an outdoor "walkway" to get to the stairwells. Additional columns for the "walkway" balcony needs to be shown, as well as edges of walls beyond. This produces a front elevation inconsistent with the floor plans submitted. Revise. 30 . Revise Exhibit A "Description of Requests" to match that indicated by Staff. Ensure all portions of the "Requests" are justified within the responses to ALL appropriate General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill criteria. 31 . Revise response to the General Applicability criteria #1 (Exhibit A) - There are only 91 existing units (not 93). Provide specific information as to HOW this proposal is in harmony with the scale, bulk, density and character of adjacent properties. Note: There are no buffers required in the Tourist District. 32 . Revise response to the General Applicability criteria #5 (Exhibit A) - Provide specific information as to HOW the proposal is consistent with the surrounding character. 33 . Revise response to the General Applicability criteria #6 (Exhibit A) - Provide specific information as to HOW this proposal minimizes any adverse visual effects on the adjacent properties (see prior comment also). 34.1 Revise response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 (Exhibit A) - a. There are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District and, due to the sidewalks within the 10-foot setback area, this does not provide for the full 10-foot area for landscaping. b. Reductions to setbacks are only in the rear, where there is a reduction to building/structure. c. Provide specific information as to HOW the increase in height will not adversely impact adjacent or surrounding properties. d. Proposal is for attached dwellings, not a hotel. 35 . Revise response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 (Exhibit A) - Directions of ALL surrounding projects wrong. Ensure surrounding projects are within close proximity to this project. Provide information as to all aspects of compatibility with adjacent land uses (height is not the only indicator of compatibility). 36. Revise response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 (Exhibit A) - Unclear of the statements of how this attached dwelling project is such that "all can enjoy" and "not limited to single-family owners." Speak to the criteria which is regarding the "form and function" of the proposal. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 46 37 . Revise response toTne Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 (Exhibit A) - Response is insufficient justification as to how flexibility regarding setbacks and height benefits the community chararacter and the immediate vicinity and the City as a whole. A luxury condominium could be constructed without such flexibility. Explain how the elimination of the restaurant will "slow the traffic flow." 38 . Revise response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #9 (Exhibit A) - Parking exceeding Code requirements are only by six spaces, which represents a 0.088 increase over the required parking, which is not significant. 39 . Provide justification for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity regarding density for the following: I . Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(D). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 40. Exhibit A - Beach by Design #2 - Unclear of the "step-backs" referred to, as there is only that in front of the.building on the 7th Floor. Design does have a "box-like" appearance. 41 . Exhibit A - Beach by Design #3 - Unclear as to any proposed fountain. I haven't found one yet. 42 . Exhibit A - Beach by Design #4 - Unclear as to any waterfall feature. I haven't found one yet. 43 . Unclear as to proposed pool fencing. Advise/show on all appropriate sheets. 44 . Sheet C3.1 - In order to provide a greater area for the proposed landscaping and to minimize impacts of landscaping on proposed utilities, move the proposed fire line to the rear on the west side closer to the building. 45 . Perspective drawing on Sheet A100 - The prior project for this site approved on March 22, 2005, had greater movement and detailing of the facade as well as stepping of the building east to west. This proposal presents a more flat facade with less detailing, especially on the front facade, in the form of facade stucco treatments, columning, banding window detailing, arching, etc. (and no side stepping of the building). Unclear why some floor levels have railings which appear to be concrete balustrades but most with aluminum railings, which does not produce a cohesive appearance. 46 . The site plan on Sheet C2.1 and the architectural plans on Sheet A300 appear to indicate a solid wall around the ground-level parking garage, but the side elevations on Sheets A402 and A403 appear to have openings between the columns. Which is correct? Revise that which is incorrect. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 9/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 8/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 47 5. • N FLD 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD C b ?? ase um er: 2005-07 2 -- 2:00 pm Owner(s): Clearwater Grande Dev Llc 20001 Gulf Blvd Ste 5 ? ?. Indian Shores, F133785 . TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland veland Street Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: nestech@mindspring.com Location: 1.437 acres located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 1,200 feet west of Gulf Boulevard. Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 16.6 feet (to open stairs) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535-2424, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Association(s): Clearwater, F1 33767 895 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 530-4517, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447-0290, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-441-8212, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: cpoint7@knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-442-0664, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: clwpt8@tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Blackburn Applicant/Rep: Housh Ghovaee, Doreen Williams, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 42 General Engineering: • • 1 . Prior to building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the ROW of Gulfview Blvd. Contact Engineering at (727) 562-4750 in Room 220 at the Municipal Services Building. 2. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 3. Provide letter of authorization to authorize construction within Progress Energy easement. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Fire: 1 . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2 . This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by both the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Building Code and Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . This building must be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. This building must be provided with an automatic wet standpipe with fire pump providing 100 psi at roof. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: 1 , Trees #47, 48 and 49 are highly valuable and recommend relocationg on site as well as other plain trees. Resolve prior to building permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 43 1 . Sheet C1.1 - Witly 3407 square feet of vehicular use area, no Vnerior greenspace area is required. Revise the Site Data table for "Proposed" "Parking Lot Interior Landscaping." 2. Sheet C2.1 - Revise the sight triangles for the eastern driveway to 20'x20'. If the building is located within the sight triangle, then the request will need to include this. 3 . Jatropha is specified as the shrub along the east, west and south sides of the property, including adjacent to the pool and pool/rear deck area. This plant is not salt tolerant and contains a milky sap that can irritate sensitive skin. All parts of the plant are reported to be poisonous if ingested. Since this site is adjacent to salt water and since it is proposed adjacent to an area where people will be recreating, it does not appear appropriate for use. Change to another plant. 4. Plants are specified on the landscape plan on Sheet L1.1 that are not listed in the Landscape Table, including: a. "PD" is specified along the east and west sides of the property; and b. "MY is specified within the front setback area in various locations. Dwarf Tricolor Jasmine and Yew podocarpus are specified in the Landscape Table, but cannot be located on the landscape plan. Revise. 5 . The landscape plan on Sheet L1.1 is not coordinated with the design of the vehicle ramp to the second floor parking area and the berming proposed (see Sheets A300 and A301). Landscape materials are proposed where the ramp will be constructed. Revise. 6. Sheet L1.1 - Indian hawthorn are specified on the west side (35) near the driveway and east side (38), but are shown to planted where the sidewalks from the rear deck and egress doors to the public sidewalk within South Gulfview Blvd. Revise. 7 . Coordinate proposed utilities in the front (water meter, BFP, FDC and FHA) with proposed landscaping to ensure landscaping will not interfere with these required improvements, nor be trampled during the normal reading of the meter or when uneventfully needed (FDC or FHA). Revise Sheet L1.1 to maintain adequate separation of devices and landscaping and potentially Sheet C3.1 to locate the FDC and FHA closer to the sidewalk/front property line. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1. How is treated runoff to discharge from the vault? 2. How is runoff in excess of treatment volume discharged from the site? 3. Provide detail of filter system. 4. Provide recovery analysis. All of the above prior to CDB. Solid Waste: 1 . Please show how Solid Waste Dumpsters will be staged for collection, also where will recycling carts be located for the residents to utilize. 4chute rooms only enough room at staging area for 2 Dumpsters. Traffic Engineering: I . Vertical height clearance for parking garage must be 8'2" to accommodate handicap van per ADAAG (entrance, route, parking stall and exit). 2. Show turning template for a scaled vehicle onto ramp and out of ramp. Vehicle must not encroach into opposing lanes. 3. Walls must not impede parked motorists line of sight when backing out. 4. Handicap parking spaces must be strategically located near accessible entrance. 5. How does gate work? Show key pad or console to operate gate? Gate vertical clearance must be 8'2". 6. Provide continuation of sidewalk along the east and west elevator lobbies. 7. Install signage and pavement markings for better internal flow for motorists, i.e. one-way sign, do not enter sign, stop sign, and directional pavement arrows. 8. Provide stop bar at base of down ramp on ground floor. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 44 1 . Deed submitted is• corded. Submit recorded deed. • 2. Identify on the plans all outdoor lighting fixtures. 3 . Show on Sheet L1.1 all sight visibility triangles. 4. Sheet C1.1 - Revise the Site Data table for "Required" "Density" to indicate 30 dwelling units per acre (43 units max.), since the proposal is for attached dwellings and not overnight accommodations. 5 . Revise the "Revised Exhibit A" to the application for "Description of Requests" to indicate 91 (not 93) rooms will be razed under this proposal. 6. Sheet C1.1 - Revise the "Proposed" "Building Height" from 99.75 feet to 99.33 feet. 7 . Recommend providing two parking spaces per unit. 8 . Sheet C1.1 - Revise "Proposed" "Parking" to indicate two handicap parking spaces are located on the second floor. 9. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 10. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 11 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 12 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 13 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 14. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 15 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 17. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 18 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 19. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. 20. Unclear why a loading space is being provided, since this is not a nonresidential use. Additionally, unclear how a truck would get out of this space, head first to exit to South Gulfview Blvd. 21 . Sheet C2.1 - Dimension the drive aisles on the east and west sides of the building on the ground floor between the stairs and the columns (dimensions to less than 24 feet). 22. Rear stairs over the pool equipment room are shown different on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 than on Sheets A300 and A301. Coordinate and revise appropriate sheets. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 45 23 . Based on the turning movements exiting the second floor parking arehe fact that vehicles are exiting down a ramp and the front setback area is a landscape berm from the front property line to the ramp, from a safety standpoint, shouldn't at least the highest portion of the ramp have something higher than a six-inch curb to prevent a vehicle from accidentally going right down the berm? 24. Individual storage units are indicated on the ground floor on Sheets C2.1, C3.1, L1.1 and A300. Since the building is within the VE flood zone, storage is not allowed below BFE. Remove from plans. 25 . Unclear why the pool/rear deck must be the size that it is proposed. This is a massive amount of brick pavers proposed. Either justify the enormity of this pool/rear deck or reduce in size (not supportive of the proposed deck size at this time). 26. Since there are trash chutes and trash rooms planned where dumpsters will be stored until pickup days, and since a "dumpster staging area" has been provided adjacent to the building, unclear why the "dumpster staging area" is being designed to look like a dumpster enclosure with gates. Explain or remove the enclosure and gates. 27. Sheet A401 - Provide greater clarity on the elevation as to the first floor party room windows and doors, as well as the exterior restrooms (see Sheet A301) and including the restrooms relationship to the second floor units (roof of restrooms- what will it look like?). 28 . Since the hotel proposal for this property was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on March 22, 2005 and now apparently is not to be constructed, discussion at the March CDB meeting was contentious regarding setbacks and building location. This may be expected again for this project. Therefore, it is highly recommended to indicate on the plans the location of the adjacent structures (east and west) and the heights of those adjacent structures. With the redesign and change in use for this proposal from the last proposal, it is also highly recommended to provide justification for the building location, setbacks and height. Provide whatever perspective drawings, view studies, etc. as part of your justification. 29. North elevation (Sheet A400) is not coordinated in design with the floor plans (A302 - A310) that indicates what amounts to double balconies providing "private" outdoor areas to bedrooms, yet with an outdoor "walkway" to get to the stairwells. Additional columns for the "walkway" balcony needs to be shown, as well as edges of walls beyond. This produces a front elevation inconsistent with the floor plans submitted. Revise. 30. Revise Exhibit A "Description of Requests" to match that indicated by Staff. Ensure all portions of the "Requests" are justified within the responses to ALL appropriate General Applicability and Comprehensive Infrll criteria. 31 . Revise response to the General Applicability criteria #1 (Exhibit A) - There are only 91 existing units (not 93). Provide specific information as to HOW this proposal is in harmony with the scale, bulk, density and character of adjacent properties. Note: There are no buffers required in the Tourist District. 32 . Revise response to the General Applicability criteria #5 (Exhibit A) - Provide specific information as to HOW the proposal is consistent with the surrounding character. 33 . Revise response to the General Applicability criteria #6 (Exhibit A) - Provide specific information as to HOW this proposal minimizes any adverse visual effects on the adjacent properties (see prior continent also). 34 . Revise response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 (Exhibit A) - a. There are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District and, due to the sidewalks within the 10-foot setback area, this does not provide for the full 10-foot area for landscaping. b. Reductions to setbacks are only in the rear, where there is a reduction to building/structure. c. Provide specific information as to HOW the increase in height will not adversely impact adjacent or surrounding properties. d. Proposal is for attached dwellings, not a hotel. 35 . Revise response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 (Exhibit A) - Directions of ALL surrounding projects wrong. Ensure surrounding projects are within close proximity to this project. Provide information as to all aspects of compatibility with adjacent land uses (height is not the only indicator of compatibility). 36 . Revise response to the Comprehensive Infrll Redevelopment Project criteria #7 (Exhibit A) - Unclear of the statements of how this attached dwelling project is such that "all can enjoy" and "not limited to single-family owners." Speak to the criteria which is regarding the "form and function" of the proposal. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 46 37 . Revise response At Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Priteria #8 (Exhibit A) - Response is insufficient justification as to how flexibility regarding setbacks and height benefits the community chararacter and the immediate vicinity and the City as a whole. A luxury condominium could be constricted without such flexibility. Explain how the elimination of the restaurant will "slow the traffic flow." 38 . Revise response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #9 (Exhibit A) - Parking exceeding Code requirements are only by six spaces, which represents a 0.088 increase over the required parking, which is not significant. 39. Provide justification for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity regarding density for the following: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(D). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 40. Exhibit A - Beach by Design #2 - Unclear of the "step-backs" referred to, as there is only that in front of the building on the 7th Floor. Design does have a "box-like" appearance. 41 . Exhibit A - Beach by Design #3 - Unclear as to any proposed fountain. I haven't found one yet. 42. Exhibit A - Beach by Design #4 - Unclear as to any waterfall feature. I haven't found one yet. 43 . Unclear as to proposed pool fencing. Advise/show on all appropriate sheets. 44. Sheet C3.1 - In order to provide a greater area for the proposed landscaping and to minimize impacts of landscaping on proposed utilities, move the proposed fire line to the rear on the west side closer to the building. 45 . Perspective drawing on Sheet A100 - The prior project for this site approved on March 22, 2005, had greater movement and detailing of the facade as well as stepping of the building east to west. This proposal presents a more flat facade with less detailing, especially on the front facade, in the form of facade stucco treatments, columning, banding window detailing, arching, etc. (and no side stepping of the building). Unclear why some floor levels have railings which appear to be concrete balustrades but most with aluminum railings, which does not produce a cohesive appearance. 46 . The site plan on Sheet C2.1 and the architectural plans on Sheet A300 appear to indicate. a solid wall around the ground-level parking garage, but the side elevations on Sheets A402 and A403 appear to have openings between the columns. Which is correct? Revise that which is incorrect. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 9/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 8/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 47 Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. )t-?> ? CCO-D' Meeting Date: P t-? ?,-, i-\ r , . _ -, ' t l ! Location: ? Current Use: '0U-- ? Active Code Enforcement Case &) yes: ? Address number es (no) (vacant land) ? Landscaping es) (no) ? Overgrown (yes) ? Debris (yes) nMo ? Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) n? ? Building(s) ) (fair) (poor) (vacant land) ? Fencing (none) ( oo) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ? Paint (good) air (poor) (garish) ? Grass Parking (yes) ( ? Residential Parking Violations (yes) ? Signage (none) o (not ok) (billboard) ? Parking (n/a) ( ripe (handicapped) (needs repaving) ? Dumpster nclose (not enclosed) ? Outdoor storage (yes Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Dater nOReviewed by: f'l t`aV'1(L) Telephone: Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 Division of Corporations • Page 1 of 2 711iDW.510 dfiz n r ., ?t11 u. A Florida Limited Liability CLEARWATER GRANDE DEVELOPMENT, LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 20001 GULF BLVD., SUITE 5 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 MAILING ADDRESS 20001 GULF BLVD., SUITE 5 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 Document Number FEI Number Date Filed L04000049230 201313584 06/30/2004 State Status Effective Date FL ACTIVE 06/30/2004 Total Contribution 0.00 Registered Agent Name & Address ARSENAULT, KENNETH G JR. 10225 ULMERTON ROAD, SUITE 2 LARGO FL 33771 Manaizer/Member Detail l Ti & dd ress t e Name A PAGE, STEPHEN J 20001 GULF BLVD., SUITE 5 MGRM INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 ------------- Annual ReDorts 11 Report Year II Filed Date II http : //www. sunbiz. orglscriptslcordet. exe?a l =DETFIL&n 1=LO40000492 3 0&n2=NAMF WD ... 7/7/2005 Division of Corporations 0 . Page 2 of 2 II 2005 II 03/11/2005 ?l Previous Filing I Return to List Next Filing No Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 03/11/2005 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 06/30/2004 -- Florida Limited Liabilites THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry Corporations Help http ://www. sunbiz. org/scripts/cordet. exe?a 1=DETFIL&n 1=LO400004923 0&n2=NAMF WD... 7/7/2005 Pinellas County Property Approo r Information: 17 29 15 05004 002 04 Page 2 of 5 17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 003 / 0080 07-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:34:04 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales CLEARWATER GRANDE DEU LLC OBK: 13822 OPT: 0129 20001 GULF BLVD STE 5 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 645 S GULFUIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 9 /2,004 13,8221 129 13,500,000 (U) I 1955: Book 038 Pgs 038-039 5 /1,992 7,91612,176 5,000,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 1 /1,992 7,781/1,314 365,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 5,700,000 Homestead: NO Ownership .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 5,700,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 5,700,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Gulf Of Mexico Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 130,925.58 1) 251 x 261 85.00 65,139.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 130, 925.58 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 130, 925.58 Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 5 BLK C. LO TS 8,9,10,11 AND Description RIP RTS Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/7/2005 ` Pinellas County Property App0r Information: 17 29 15 05004 002 0* Page 3 of 5 17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 003 / 0080 :01 07-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:34:05 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel > 3 St Property Address: 645 S GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 S?ruc?ural E1?m?n?s Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 91 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 286 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,970 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Ar4Bas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 47,968 7) . 00 0 2) Utility .55 502 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .30 6,625 9) .00 0 4) Canopy .25 624 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Comm4ercial Extra Fie aturq-- s Description Dimensions Price 1) ASPHALT 27000SF 1.50 2) COHC PAVE 2152SF 3.00 3) ELEU PASS 5-STOP 30,000.00 4) POOL IRREG 25,000.00 5) FIRESPRINK 3000SF 1.75 6) SHUFBDCT 300.00 Units Value RCD Year 27,000 40,500 40,500 999 2,152 6,460 6,460 999 2 60,000 24,000 1,970 1 25,000 101000 11970 3,000 51250 2,360 1,970 2 600 600 999 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 83,920 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*_1 [;? Fil [-41 FM FM http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/7/2005 PiAellas County Property App er Information: 17 29 15 05004 002 0 Page 4 of 5 u `?•. ?1? 2 2,, 04 pv *%Ze4? 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/7/2005 1?i iellas County Property Appgr--,er Information: 17 29 15 05004 002 02"1 l'aft, 5 of 5 Pinellas County Propertay Appraiser Parcel Information littp :i/pa .co.p?iric:lla4..ll.t htl?iz I &a::::l.&b=l&c:-.I&r-:::.1t &s=4& :)=I& ;::::O&p... 7/7,12005 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September 20, 2005, beginning at 10:00 a.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (reconsidered from 07/19/05) The City of Clearwater is requesting reconsideration of the attached sign approved through the Comprehensive Sign Program application contained within the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application that approved a problematic use for Amscot Financial in this location. [Proposed Use: Problematic Use (Amscot)] at 1874 North Highland Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 32.08. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-01004 2. Ardent International LLC., Panaviotis and Helen Vasiloudes (M3B Development LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade & 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lots 1 & 3 and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 3. Raim & Xheziie Tzekas [A Very Important Pet (AVID) Salon] are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow pet grooming and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store and to permit a 6-ft tall fence located in front of the building (approximately 5 ft back from the N Lincoln Ave frontage), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Pet Grooming/Outdoor Training Facility) at 1242 Cleveland St, Padgett's Estates Sub, Lot 3 and parts of Lots 2 & 4. Assigned Planner: John Schodder, Planner I. FLD2005-06058 4. Harborside Condo LLC (Mark Newkirk) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (16 existing attached dwelling units; 15 attached dwelling. units proposed, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 15 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 12.4 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.3 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 4.3 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.8 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 87.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.67 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.13. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 706 Bayway Blvd, Bel Crest Condo, Units 1-12 & 14-17. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07070 9 0 5. K&P Clearwater Estate II LLC (Mark International LLC, Sunrise on the Beach Inc) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 90 ft along Coronado Dr and Hamden Dr, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.5 ft (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 229 Coronado Dr, Columbia Sub Replat, parts of Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner 111. FLD2005-07061 6. LOPA LLC (Patricia A. Bilotta & Lorri S. Ritter) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 3 attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 14 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero-ft (to building) and a reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit (5 spaces) to 1.33 spaces per dwelling units (4 spaces), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.17, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to zero ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 1254 Grove St, Property of AJ Moore, Lots 14 & 15. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05042 7. Coates 1, Inc. is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 9 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 621 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay unit No 5 Replat, Blk 78, Lots 5 & 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07064 8. Jerry & Teresa Tas are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 20 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 18 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 14.94 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 14.88 (to building/pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 67.5 ft along Coronado Dr and to 71.64 ft along Hamden Dr as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C.. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 342 Hamden Dr, Columbia Sub No 2, Blk A, Lot 11 & part of Lot 10, and Columbia Sub No 3, Lot 7 & part of Lot 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner 111. FLD2005-07066 9. Hess Properties II LLC, and Bay Esplanade Properties LLC (Stephen T Hess) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (15 existing overnight 0 • accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 8 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) at 64 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 21 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 51.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 0 ft (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 64 & 566 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 79, Lots 3, 18 & 19 (less R/W for Clearwater St), and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07065 10. Seawake Motel Ltd (Enchantment, LLC) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 7 ft (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 15.7 ft ( to sidewalk) and from 20 ft to 14 ft (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 150 ft (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of 3 dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Dr, 4 dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Dr and 1 dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 691 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 16-19 & Rip Rts & land on S of Lot 19. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 11. Clearwater Grande Dev LLC (Steve J Page) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 6.3 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 17.6 ft (to open stairs) and from 20 ft to 8.8 ft (to pool deck), an increase to the building ht from 35 ft to 99.5 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 645-655 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: ZV- ayne`M.Wells,-AsiCP, Planner III. FLD2005-07072 12. Canterbury Property Mgt Inc, TLS Holdings Inc, Dorothy C Boldog Tre, and Canterbury Oaks Inc are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Blvd) setback from 15 ft to 5.45 ft (to building), from 15 ft to zero ft (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth St.) setback from 15 ft to 3.63 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Dr) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a 0 • reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 401, 411, & 421 S Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub Lots 72-77, 121-122, 124, 128-129 & parts of Lots 123 & 127. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07068 13. KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east)setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off- street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 and 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 14. Parkdale LLC (Belleair Harbor, LLC, Maria Nikolova) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 sq ft to 8,171 sq ft, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 ft to 60 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C, and preliminary plat approval for 2 lots. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (2 units)] at 475 East Shore Dr, Clearwater Beach Park 1St Add Replat Blk C, Lot 5 & Sub Land. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06056 15. Homeless Emergency Project is requesting Flexible Development application to permit the redevelopment and expansion of an existing residential shelter (including the expansion of the kitchen and dining area), in the Commercial District, to maintain the existing front, side and rear setbacks with the exception of a front (south) setback of 4 ft (to dumpster enclosure), and to permit off site parking, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of • • Sec 2-704.C and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 18 units) at 1200 Betty Ln, Fair Burn Add Blk C, Lots 7- 9. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07063 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 09/04/05 FLD2005-07072, (152) ALBER, VIRGIN!A L 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 AMOROSO, DANIEL AMOROSO, JEAN 201 WILTSHIRE RD WYNNEWOOD PA 19096 - 3332 ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS POLITIS, GREGORY C 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 BARBIERE, JOYCE L TRUST 155 BAYOU ST MARQUETTE MI 49855 - 9101 w ALDINGER, GUENTER ALDINGER, DAGMAR SCHWALBENWEG 4 74395 MUNDELSHEIM 00004 - GERMANY BAYWAY SHORES CONDO ASSN INC PO BOX 3882 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8882 BERKOVSKY, PETER BERKOVSKY, HELGA 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 508 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 BRADLEY, FELICIA N 284 BSB CMR 452 PO BOX 2563 APO AE 09045 - CAPELUTO FAMILY PTNSHP CAPELUTO, NACE L 28050 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2600 CHENOWETH, JOHN CRAIG 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS ANASTASOPOULOS,ANASTASIOS 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 BALKIN, JAMES M 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2604 BARBIERE, MICHAEL J BELANGER, JILL R 165 BAYOU ST MARQUETTE MI 49855 - 9101 BEACH FUN 1 LLC 246 2ND ST N SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - BLAKELY, JOSEPH E THE BLAKELY, BARBARA THE 921 WORCHESTER FENTON MI 48430 - 1816 BRANDT, STEPHEN W BRANDT, TERESA P 513 RIVERHILLS DR TAMPA FL 33617 - 7225 CENTER FAMILY LTD PROP TAX DEPT-09439 ONE HESS PLAZA WOODBRIDGE NJ 07095 - 1299 Clearwater Beach Association Jay Keyes 100 Devon Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 W W •AMOROSO, DANIEL F AMOROSO, EDWINA 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 302 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 ANASTASOPOULOS,ELIAS ANASTASOPOULOS, HELEN 1600 GULF BLVD # PHNO 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 BARBER, WILLIAM R BARBER, BARBARA N 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 601 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 BAYWATCH SUITES INC 600 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2601 BENDERLY, ZVI THE 875 W END AVE NEW YORK NY 10025 - 4919 BOSTROM, ERIK SUNDQUIST, BRITTA 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 505 CLEARWATER BCH 33467 - CAPELUTO FAMILY PTNSHP 28050 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2600 CHAMBERS, ANN M 15 GRAY BIRCH TRL MADISON WI 53717 - 1505 CLEARWATER BEACH SALES CENTER 20001 GULF BLVD STE 5 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 - CLEARWATER GRANDE DEV LLC Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 20001 GULF BLVD STE 5 Doug Williams, President 845 Bayway Blvd INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 - 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, FI 33767 Clearwater, FL 33761 a Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 868 Bayway Blvd #212 895 S Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, FI 33767 Clearwater, FI 33767 Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House 851 Bayway Blvd Clearwater, FI 33767 Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail 800 S Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, FI 33767 CONTINENTAL TOWERS INC 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 CUNNINGHAM, IRENE A THE 10900 W BLUEMOUND RD # 202 MILWAUKEE WI 53226 - DE VITA, MICHAEL J DE VITA, HELEN C 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 205 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 DI GIOVANNI PARTNERS-BAYWAY LL CARRIERA-BAYWAY LLC 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 FLINT IMP FUND THE 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2643 GIAMMATTEI, CAROL GIAMMATTEI, GUIDO 801 TWELVE OAKS PKWY WOODSTOCK IL 60098 - 4317 GORDON, NOBLE L 3306 SAN DOMINGO ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3338 CONWAY, E P FAM LTD PTNSP PO BOX 3318 BOARDMAN OH 44513 - 3318 CURRENT OWNER 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 DE VOS, ROBERT PO BOX 476 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0476 DORMER, JAMES J DORMER, DORIS J 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1103 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 FOLEY, BETHANY A FOLEY, JOHN R 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2605 GIBSON, PAUL 521 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - GRACILLA, MARY L 302 CLAY FURNACE RD SHARPSVILLE PA 16150 - 3104 Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 Clearwater, FI 33767 CLOW, CUSICK JOHNSON, MARQUERITE 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 905 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 CORMEY, WALTER P CORMEY, CAROLYN M 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 301 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 DALTON CLEARWATER LLC 2840 WEST BAY DR STE 135 BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL 33770 - 2620 DECADE GULFCOAST HOTEL PTNRS J K GULFVIEW N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR # 100 WAUKESHA W153188 - 1131 DOULAS, GARIFALIA 40-417 HARDING BLVD W RICHMOND HILL ON L4C 9S5 00030 CANADA GARBIS, ANTHONY GARBIS, ANTOINETTE 204 S VINE ST HINSDALE IL 60521 - 4042 GOMEZ, R SCOTT GOMEZ, MARY L 1806 BREEZY TRL VERONA WI 53593 - 7901 GRGURICH, JOHN GRGURICH, KATICA 5021 W CAROLL AVE SKOKIE IL 60077 - GRUBER, CRAIG M HANKINS, JOHN M HANSON, JOHN E 10 PAPAYA ST APT 502 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 201 HANSON, BRENDA E CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2606 620 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 0 e • HAYWOOD, MARGARET R THE HOLT, SUE E THE HOLT, SUE E 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1008 257 UNION ST 257 UNION ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 EAST BRIDGEWATER MA 02333 - EAST BRIDGEWATER MA 02333 - Housh Ghovaee HOWELL, LESLIE F JR TRUST HUBER, NANCY L Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 4 2789 BRIDLE RD 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - BLOOMFIELD MI 48304 - 1609 Clearwater, FL 33755 ISLAND KEY DEV LLC JANIS, JOHN JOHNSON, PAMELA B 19535 GULF BLVD STE B 10300 S LONG AVE 4021 AUDUBON DR INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 - 2240 OAK LAWN IL 60453 - 4643 LARGO FL 33771 - KALLAS, LELA KAMINSKAS, STEVEN W KELLER, ELIZABETH M 4 BAY VIEW CIR KAMINSKAS, LEISA 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 802 SALEM MA 01970 - 2630 4N160 HAWTHORNE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 BENSENVILLE IL 60106 - 2909 KELTY, JAMES SR KINNEY, JAMES H KOUMOULIDIS, VALENTINOS KELTY, SUSAN KINNEY, BARBARA J 1050 OYSTERWOOD ST 3994 NAPIER RD 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 8 HOLLYWOOD FL 33019 - 4847 CANTON MI 48187 - 4628 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 KOUMOULIDIS, VALENTINOS KRITICOS, SAM KUDER, RICHARD C 612 BAYWAY BLVD KRITICOS, ELIZABETH 1324 COBBLER LN CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 757 MANDALAY ALLENTOWN PA 18104 - 9220 2601 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1433 LAGOON RESORT MOTEL LE COMPTE, LENA LE, SANG VAN 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD 152 HIGHLAND ST NGUYEN, DUNG THI CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2643 BUCKEYE LAKE OH 43008 - 3896 LAKE BLVD N CLEARWATER FL 33762 - LEE, NADYNE S LENART, TED THE LINARES, ANTHONY 908 WALLACE LENART, MARIA THE LENART FAMILY TRUST 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 105 LEITCHFIELD KY 42754 - 1479 625 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2643 LOVITZ, JULIUS L REVOCABLE TRU MANCUSO, ROBERT H MARINI, DOROTHEA LOVITZ, JULIUS L BEN 1457 CLIFTON PARK RD 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 602 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 501 SCHENECTADY NY 12309 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 MARTIN, GARY M MARKOS, CHRIS MARTIN, BERNICE J MC CLURE MOORINGS LLC 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1204 606 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2677 1046 ARDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - VILLA HILLS KY 41017 - 3727 MC DONALD, ROBERT J MC GEE, JOHN P MC DONALD, MARY MC GEE, MICHELLE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 807 PO BOX 3455 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MC MULLIN, DONALD J MC MULLIN, MARGARET U 'TRE 500 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVD # 628 WILDWOOD NJ 08260 - 5891 MENDELSOHN, HARVEY H MENDELSOHN, CATHERINE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2679 MICHAEL, ANN M 7041 BRIDGETOWN RD CINCINNATI OH 45248 - 2005 MOORINGS TOWNHOMES I LLC 9100 BAY HILL BLVD ORLANDO FL 32819 - 4883 MOSCA, LANA L 1875 MCCAULEY RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1512 NASSIF, FREDERICK J NASSIF, JANET L 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1005 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 PALLS, BYRON P PALLS, BEATRICE K 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 PETRIK, CONSTANCE C THE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 PRICE, TIM E 781 69TH AVE S ST PETERSBURG FL 33705 - 6247 MISKEL, ELIZABETH V 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 MORAITIS, CHRIST 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 NAKIS, MICHELINE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 804 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 OFSTEDAL, IRVIN J OFSTEDAL, LUCILLE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 PANUTHOS, PANIAGOTTA TRUST PANUTHOS, PANIAGOTTA THE 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 POLEMENAKOS, SOTIROS POLEMENAKOS,THEOHARI 352 ATLANTIC AVE MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 - 2732 RAMSEY, CLAIR J RAMSEY, BARBARA M 1406 SAINT GOTTHARD AVE ANCHORAGE AK 99508 - 5052 MC KERROW, DONALD C THE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 MEYER, JAMES W MEYER, LINDA K 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33767- 2657 MONCRIEFZ, J SCOTT MONCRIEFF, SUZANNE S 1570 WERNER DR ALVA FL 33920 - MORELLI, MARY A 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 NASSIF, FREDERICK J 675 GGULFVIEW BLVD # 906 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 ORGETTAS, MICHAEL THE 74 CENTRAL ST PEABODY MA 01960 - 4357 PARR, VINCENT E PARR, LUNEY A 633 OAKLAND TAMPA FL 33617 - POLITIS, GREGORY 965 S BAYSHORE BLVD SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 4217 REED, MARTIN J 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ROOTH, CRAIG J ROY, JOHN B RUSSELL, SHELDON P 675 GULFVIEW BLVD S # 1203 ROY, JANE S 1415 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2679 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1001 MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120 - 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 RUSSO, KAREN B 0 • RUSSO, ANTHONY J SAILMATE INVESTMENTS LLC 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 901 200 BRIGHTWATER DR # 2 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 SCOTT, MICHAEL V 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SGROI, RALPH O SGROI, LAURA J 2781 ST ANDREWS BLVD TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 6312 SHEWA, MANOJ H DIP[, MASUMA A 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -.2657 SKTELINC 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 SUNSPREE GREEN LLC 50 N WATER ST SOUTH NORWALK CT 06854 - VUJIC, GROZDAN 3321 SAWMILL VALLEY DR MISSISSAUGA ON 1-51- 3C9 CANADA SEAWAKE MOTEL LTD 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2643 SHEFFIELD, MARGARET SHEFFIELD, JAMES S 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2606 SILVERMAN, DIANE 2121 BATHURST ST # 620 TORONTO ON M5N 2P3 00030 - CANADA SPAGNOLA, JOHN SPAGNOLA, ROSALYN C 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 TU,DUANHUA ZHANG,FENG 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 803 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 WAGNER, WILLIAM H WAGNER, JOSEPHINE C 00030- 559 LORING VILLAGE CT ORANGE PARK FL 32073 - 2960 WEG, KARL WEG, MARIA 1501 GULF BLVD # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2903 WOODS, NOEL D 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2605 ZEIER, NORBERT G ZEIER, MARGARET E 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 503 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 WOLFE, JOHN M 501 ERIE AVE TAMPA FL 33606 - 3643 ZAREMBA, THOMAS S 1 SEAGATE STE 999 TOLEDO OH 43604 - 4504 ZHUN, ELLEN M FAMILY TRUST 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1005 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 SCHAFFER, GEORGE A 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 SELIMAJ, ISUF WILLIAMSBRIDGE STATION PO BOX 961 BRONX NY 10467 - 0726 SHEPHARD, WILLIAM M THE 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2643 SKTEL INC 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 SULLIVAN, LETICIA BRITO SULLIVAN, JASON D 17113 RAINBOW TER ODESSA FL 33556 - VLAHOS, ELAINE 32 MAPLE ST WEST BABYLON NY 11704 - 7718 WAZIO, IRENE WAZIO, EUGENE 5511 S KOMENSKY ST CHICAGO IL 60629 - 4415 WOLMARANS, HENRY H WOLMARANS, JACKIE 675 GULFVIEW BLVD S # 1201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2679 ZEFELIPPO, MARIA R 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 0 0 Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Carolyn Cormey [ccormey@plnmortgage.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 10:03 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: From Carolyn Cormey From: Carolyn Cormey [mailto:Carolyn@cormey.net] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 8:30 PM To: 'Gildersleeve, David' Subject: From Carolyn Cormey Mr. Gildersleeve, I am sorry to use your personal email but this is the only way I know to reach the CDB. Could you please read this and the attachment and pass it on to the other members of the Community Development Board? I continue to have great concern about the aggressive policy to speed development of all of the beach, overriding even the planning commissions recommendation for a moratorium to examine the results of all the development that has rushed through the process. Dunedin listened to their planning department ... . our Community Development Board did not. Tuesday's agenda is filled with new projects to further develop the pace as rapidly as possible. What is the hurry? Why would the Board be against a little time to consider what is being done? The Quality Hotel, 645 5. Gulfview, Clearwater Grande was first passed a couple of months ago by the CDB as a condotel. In an effort to allay potential concerns about another moderately priced motel with overnight units being taken off the beach to become high-end condominium it was presented to you as a condotel. With this "concession" it passed by your board. Now, it is back again on Tuesday's consent agenda to vacate the condotel status and become high-end condominiums and will automatically pass without your comments unless someone pulls it off. Do you all realize what is happening here or perhaps this is just the way things are done? I am sorry but it makes me believe that this was perhaps the plan all along. I am an experienced mortgage broker and as you voted to pass it as a condotel development, I knew it would be back to convert to condominiums. Condotels are all but impossible to finance in the 500K to 1+ Million dollar range, as was planned when it came to you for approval as a condotel. Condotels sell well in the $200K range where people pay cash. This developer was experienced and it is hard to believe that when he brought this to you as a fully developed condotel, he did not realize this. Once the door was opened by your Board's approval, it seems that it was easy enough to just slide onto your consent agenda. Don't you see this as rather ......accommodating? As to Pelican Walk, I wasn't at the meeting where the CDB approved his project but after he walked away from his contract with the city for a much needed parking garage, why did he get the approvals for his project if it included ANY waivers from the current code? Thank you very much for your consideration and I appreciate your service. 9/20/2005 /A 0 • Page 2 of 2 Carolyn Carolyn Cormey Carolyn@cormey.net 727.462.5467 675 S. Gulfview Blvd. #301 Clearwater, FL 33767 9/20/2005 September 19, 2005 To: Mayor Hibbard, Clearwater City Council, Clearwater Community Development Board, All elected or appointed Clearwater Officials Please take a minute to review the information below. At Tuesday's Community Development Board meeting, more development projects will be approved converting even more moderately priced hotel/motel rooms that allowed families to afford to come to the beach for their vacation, into high-end condominiums. The hotel rooms that are coming to the beach are ALL high-end hotels that are priced out of most families' vacation price range. Added to this is our increasingly un-friendly beach parking, which will offer even less parking after the completion of Beach by Design. Our new bridge brings families to the beach even quicker so that they can spend more time wandering the beach for less parking. Is this what you really intended? CLEARWATER BEACH - SOUTH BEACH - PUBLIC PARKING AVAILIBILITY CURRENT LEVEL AND WHAT WILL BE FOLLOWING BEACH BY DESIGN. Marina Parking at the Circle Currently 285 spaces - 71 permit only 214 spaces All - maximum, 1 hour parking Pier 60 Parking Lot - lot to the right at the bend of the road, to S. Gulfview Blvd. Currently 221 spaces Reduced to 154 Spaces Beach Front City Parking Lot - along gulf waterfront on S. Gulf view Blvd. in front of shops & restaurants Currently 463 spaces Redistributed 400 "public" spaces under control of Hyatt for price & availability 15 "public" spaces under control of Patel for price & availability Corner of Devon & Hamden City Parking Lot - New 25 spaces 25 spaces, available on completion of Beach Walk South Beach Metered Street Parking- Currently 53 spaces Changed to 21 spaces, 5. Gulf view Blvd. 19 spaces, Coronado Several years from now ....... Let's say you were a young family wanting to take your young children to Clearwater Beach for the day. It is Saturday, the weather is perfect and you are feeling so lucky that you live close enough to be able to go to the beach for the day! You pack up your cooler, your umbrella, your porta-crib, the two bags with the beach towels, paper diapers and the kids beach toys.. and you "cut down" to just one beach chair for your wife. You pile the kids and the misses in the car and sing all the way ..... to the beach! You zoom over our beautiful new bridge, oooing and awing at the view. Then, you start looking for that parking place. You go left from the circle heading for the beach and the Pier 60, 154 space city parking lot is full. You drive on and see a Hyatt Hotel (400 space) parking lot. While it says "public," you also see that it says Hyatt in bigger letters . .. you are unsure about what this means so you drive past it, because it is a hotel and who knows how much it would cost - and - in the minute you have to survey it as you drive by, you are uncertain as to whether it really means you can park there anyway. You continue on, adding your car to the others, who just like you are roaming the beach for parking. It is hot and you are moving slowly, bumper to bumper. You drive the beach streets and cannot find one of the 40, metered street spaces that is open. You pull into the big Marina parking lot but see that any open space among, the 214 spaces, is marked 1 hour parking only" and there are some signs that say "Marina Business Only". That won't help. You drive on. You head up Mandalay, north of the circle. There are a few 2 hour parking spaces along one side of the street but none are available. But, drive on - there are 148 on street metered spaces north of the circle! Some are 2 hour but more are 5 hour - and - you might get lucky! The car is hot and the kids are starting to get on your nerves because they WANT TO GET OUT OF THE CAR AND GO TO THE BEACH! You get to the Rockaway and cannot believe that among the 145 spaces, not one was available! You see the line of people waiting at the Rockaway restaurant and see that there is a restaurant at the other end of the beach. You understand that this is their restaurant parking lot too. There are some scattered parking lots north of the circle (containing a total of 238 spaces) but they were not always well marked and you missed some of them. You drive further north on Mandalay and your heart leaps as you see some open street parking spaces with NO METERS. How, could you be so lucky!!!!! Then, you look up and see that these are business parking, marked by signs that say 1 hour parking only. You tell the kids to settle down for the 20'h time and continue driving north on Mandalay. You come to another, smaller circle and see the street name, Alicia. All of a sudden, there is no traffic, it is peaceful and there are houses along each side. You turn left towards the gulf and make your way to the street running along the beach. You see open street ends leading to beautiful, un-crowded beaches. You drive along further up the street, gazing longingly at each street end leading to an open, un-crowded beach and then turn your head to look for any non-existent parking place so that you and your family could enjoy the beach at ANY street end. You drive on for 2 miles from the Alicia circle looking at street end after street end, glimpsing perfect, empty beaches - no parking in sight. You finally "get it." You realize that, while the state requires that the street ends leading to the public beach be open to provide public access to the public beaches - the beach has actually been privatized for the use of the residents who live there! This has been done by not allowing any street parking! Your tax dollars provides their private beach! You and all the other inland Clearwater citizens who are not lucky or wealthy enough to be able to afford to live on the beach only get to use 1.5 miles of the beach in the center of the island. You and your family stay in the beach area beginning at the AdamsMark, going north to Alicia street Circle. This is where the parking is, even though it is minimal and inadequate. North beach residents get the private use of the last two miles of the best beach and those living south of AdamsMark enjoy beaches completely blocked to the public. You shake your head sadly and head back to the "public zone." 0 0 You have now been driving for about 40 minutes, looking around for that parking spot on what, you're certain, MUST be the busiest beach day of the year. As you first came over the bridge, you spotted a big parking garage on the causeway leading to the beach but had passed it because you knew that you and your family would have to take a shuttle to the beach. How could you get your cooler, umbrella, bags, beach chair and porta-crib on the shuttle bus? If you could get it all on the shuttle, going out to the beach with your kids and "stuff" would be hard but bringing back all that stuff with tired, sandy, cranky kids, on a shuttle bus, in the crowds ... possibly waiting .... would be a nightmare. You look at your wife and she nods her head, wiping the sweat off her forehead. And now, as you travel back over the beautiful new bridge towards your home, you begin to try and explain to the kids ......... And then, there are the families who want to come to the beach for a vacation - the ones who could afford the Red Roof Inn, Quality Inn or independent motel but not afford the Hyatt. Here is as much information as I could find. I know that there is more but this is what was available. Is this what you intended, with more conversions from overnight units to luxury condos on the books in the months to come? # Street Hotel/Motel Overnight High-end High-end New Project Name Name Units) condos Overnight Name/Develop. Units #Lost #Gained #Gained 715 5. Gulf view Holiday Inn 217 149 5un5 ree 691 " Best Western 110 90 Enchantment 645 " Quality Hotel 91 68 Clearwater Grande 521 " Ramada/Gulf view 289 36 241 Entracla 430 " Adams Mark 217 112 78 T/W Residences 421 " Red Roof Inn 73 100 Siena Sands 411 401 Travelodge 54 325 " Parcel A: 69 102 Lucca Development Howard Johnson Americana Gulf Parcel B: 46 ? Parcel C: 44 Albatross Motel Tropicana Motel 301 " Glass House Mo. 67 18 206 Hyatt 229 " Beach Place Mo. 219 " 200 75 350 Patel 215 " Spyglass Motel Total for 201 " Beach Towers All of these 100 Coronado Day's Inn motels City Officials and City Appointees, By creating parking-unfriendly zones to cover the major portion of Clearwater Beach and allowing developer- friendly development to convert the majority of affordable overnight units to high-end condominiums with way fewer high-end overnight hotel units, you are completely changing the beach from family-friendly to an exclusive resort for the rich. Is this what you had in mind? It certainly appears that way. Developers are locking the beach away from all but the wealthiest. After years of promises, the city has unforgivably procrastinated in providing us the promised on-beach parking lot and by the time Beach by Design has completed will have even reduced the number of our meager parking spaces further by "deals" made to turn over our prime beach parking to high-end hotel/condo developers to "manage." Instead of guarding our "hen house" has the city given it over to the wolves? Because the city has encouraged the acceleration of beach property values to mega-prices by their affirmation of every proposed development project, waiving any code restriction that may hinder the developer, regardless of the recommendation of the planning department - we are now being told that the property on the beach is too expensive to build that promised parking garage on the beach! Again, instead of guarding our "hen house," has the city given it over to the wolves, even if dressed in the best of clothes? As a result of these kinds of decisions being made by our city elected/appointed officials over and over again, we are now being told how expensive the beach property is and that we might not be able to afford a parking garage that is actually on the beach. There is an idea being floated around about parking garage off the beach, an "un-family-friendly" parking garage - with shuttle service to the beach. I would like to ask those of you who participated in the procrastination, those of you who are elected or appointed in our city government... have any of you had to take a shuttle to the beach with your young children, cooler, beach bags, chairs, porta-cribs . . .....? Do you care about the families who do, the ones that voted for you? We have invested millions and millions in a beautiful bridge making it easier and faster for those coming to the beach (at least that is what we were told when the bridge was proposed). When we get to the beach "faster and easier," no parking has been provided for us and what limited parking there currently is - will be reduced in Beach by Design. Citizens will be left to mill around in traffic, joining all the others who have no place to park, spending many times the amount of time they "saved" by the "convenience" of the new mega-million dollar bridge. (Beginning to sound like that PORK-project bridge costing millions and millions that Denny Hestert put into the transportation bill, a bridge for the benefit of the small amount of residents who lived on an island in his district.) In the years ahead, when we begin to live with the results of what this specific Clearwater Administration and Appointed Board Members have done to our precious, irreplaceable, extremely limited resource, Clearwater Beach -things that cannot be undone - the developers who lined their own pockets with money and the rich residents who live on the beach may thank you but ... the Clearwater citizens who for outnumber them, will not. Do you disrespect the citizens so much as to think that they will not eventually see what has happened to "their beach" and recognize that "their beach" has been sold off!!! Are you all so short sighted and single minded in your focus that you do not recognize that the citizens of Clearwater will be angry, really angry and blame you, all of you? Do you really want this for a legacy? Is there some other agenda here that I am just not getting because if so, I would really like to know. You can practice by telling me because in the years to come, those of you who continue to live in this area will be asked to defend your decisions over and over again as families get mad all over again each time they want to go to the beach and recognize that there has been no room provided for them at the beach, which is in the city they pay taxes to. If the tone of this letter sounds disrespectful to you as elected officials or committee appointees, please accept my apology for delivery, not content. I am a very direct person and have a definite sense of what is right and what is wrong. My position in this hurts me personally as I am a local mortgage person and Realtor who derives her business from real estate sales in this area. My opinion is not popular with either Realtors who send me business or Developers. However, I am a beach resident who is not motivated by the greed of seeing my condo go up in price any more than I am motivated by trying to see that others can't have what I have. My motivation is simply - we have the most beautiful beach and we have an obligation to make certain that everyone has the right to enjoy our beach. Our beach is public. Carolyn Cormey Carolyn@cormey.net 727.462.5467 675 S. Gulfview Blvd. #301 Clearwater Beach. FL 33767 : ROOF TILE P-1 MOLDING AND COLUMNS P-2 TOP FIELD P-3 MID-FIELD P-5 BRACKETS AND ACCENTS P-6 RAILING CLEARWATER GRANDE P-4 BASE FIELD ORIGINAL 1? 11 V/ I_ JU .01 2005 G li b' L e PAV i ii.svest Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. ORIGINAL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND PARKING STUDY FOR CLEARWATER GRANDE CLEARWATER , FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: CLEARWATER GRANDE DEVELOPMENT, LLC PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. NOVEMBER 2004 PROJECT # 04-074 f Robert Pergoli i, CP AICP #9023 2005 'LAWING DEVE- .0PkilE a r SVCSl' I. II. ??? o 1 I ORIGINAL J_ _ 2005 INTRODUCTION - PLANNING & DE?'ct GF??1? "J sVcs Clearwater Grande De p kfrf( ?.?i?Vag'asmg to redevelop their property on Clearwater Beach into a 93 room resort hotel with a 3,500 s.f. restaurant and a parking garage. (See Figure 1) The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in Tourist "T" zoning district. This application requires an assessment of the traffic impacts of development and it was determined a parking study should be completed. As part of the redevelopment 94 existing hotel rooms and restaurant will be eliminated (Quality Inn). Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The property has frontage on South Gulfview Boulevard east of Hamden Drive. South Gulfview Boulevard is a three lane collector roadway running along Clearwater Beach. Hamden Drive intersects with S. Gulfview Boulevard at a signalized intersection. Traffic counts conducted in November 2004 at the following intersections: S. Gulfview Blvd. / Hamden Drive S. Gulfview Blvd. / Bayway Blvd. S. Gulfview Drive / Existing Quality Inn Driveways All traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. According to the traffic counts S. Gulfview Boulevard carries 1,151 vehicles east of Hamden Drive, and 977 vehicles adjacent to the site. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS software. The HCS printouts are included in Appendix A. Presently the signalized intersection at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Hamden Drive operates at LOS B with average delay being 12.4 seconds per vehicle. The intersection at S. Gulfview Blvd. / Bayway Blvd. is "YIELD "controlled with Bayway Blvd. traffic yielding the right-of-way. Presently at this intersection eastbound left turns operate at LOS A and the Bayway Blvd. approach (SB) operates at LOS B. South Gulfview Boulevard functions as major city (non-state) roadway and according to FDOT 2002 QLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacity of 1,460 vehicles per hour since it has a continuous center turn lane. South Gulfview Boulevard presently operates at LOS D during the peak hour. 1 r r r r r r r 1 r r r. f a m 0 N O O m LL r? 3 U luu QLL Q N f r. rm? 2 ti o? o? r? o? ud a= ?o 0 m `wm rqm ZAZ G =v ' z n Zm r .p i A I Oi r 3 w w Cf) PROTECT LOCATION BAyWAY BLVD. w PROJECT NO: PROJECT LOCATION - CLEARWATER GRANDE 04-074 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 1 1 2004 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. ORIGINAL QTyCk t..::i altZLI' Zd `Z. NAL 0 5 w C?7 CA Q 0 Q w N c0 N ? 254 345 N L 248 ? 593 330 - 558- 49 27 509 T 303 - 504 - 504 - 6 ? 0 - ?-? PROJECT NO: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (2004) 04-074 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 11/2004 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. u JUL Q 1 2005 N N.T.S V lAPit?3NG 3 C7EL?ciS`JCS BAy?TAY BLVD. f 462 -462 00?p ? 0 ? 4 467 III. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ORIGINAL As per the approved methodology existing traffic was adjusted by a 1.5% annual growth rate to the expected build-out year of 2006 to account for background traffic from other nearby redevelopment projects. The proposed Clearwater Grande redevelopment on the subject property is expected to contain 93 resort hotel rooms, and a 3,500 square foot attached sit-down restaurant. Parking will be provided within the structure. As part of the redevelopment the existing 94 hotel rooms and 2,000 s.f restaurant will be eliminated, although this traffic was not deducted. Using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 7 Edition rates, the amount of new trips was calculated and estimates are shown below: TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Land Use Amount Daily Trips PM Peak Trip Resort Hotel 930cc. Rooms 830 46(20/26) Hi,h-Tumover Restaurant 3.500 s.f. 445 38(23/15) Total 1,275 84(43/41) The vehicular access will be taken from S. Gulfview BI distribution is as follows: 60% to / from the north (50) 40% to / from the south (34) PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATI cl . a the ex ectea D 2005 PCAt NINri, Project ' Road Segment Lanes Project Trips Capacity Percent S. Gulview (Hamden - Site) 2LD 50 1460 3.42% S. Gulfview (Site - Clwtr. Pass Bridge) 2LD 34 1460 2.33% ' Future operations at the S. Gulfview Boulevard / Hamden Drive signalized intersection would continue at LOS B with average delay increasing to 12.9 ' seconds per vehicle. At the S. Gulfview Blvd. / Bayway Blvd. intersection the eastbound left turns would continue to operate at LOS A and the Bayway Blvd. approach (SB) would continue to operate at LOS B. ' At the project entrance driveway (one-way entrance) from S. Gulview Blvd. Drive, westbound left turns into the site would operate at LOS A. ' At the project exit driveway (one-way exit) to S. Gulfview Boulevard all exiting vehicles would operate at LOS B. 2 N N.T.S w w C7 A w A o z W o Q U 'S x co _ 25% co N 272 L 351-? 28 323 - Fri 1 J 1s a 1 2005 ?1 'LANNfNG & DEVELQPt.i? ,4-T SvCS 'ORIGINAL 0 Ln 1-11 _ 60%_ 369 -¦-- 266 - 635 601 - 51 550 - BAYWAY BLVD. 000?000 17 40% ?- 505 ?-505 - 497 - 525 525 - F- 5417: 26 --? 25 16 ENTER ? f EXIT PROJECT NO: FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (2006) 04-074 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 11/2004 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. 1 With background traffic and project traffic added S. Gulfview Blvd. would carry 1,236 vehicles east of Hamden Drive, and 1,038 between the site and Clearwater 1 Pass Bridge. This represents LOS D conditions on a three-lane collector road, which demonstrates acceptable operations. Future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, and the HCS printouts are included in Appendix B. ORIGINAL 1 IV. PARKING STUDY 1 The Quality Inn is located at 655 S. Gulfview Boulevard and has long been a tourist destination hotel. The resort hotel contains 94 hotel rooms, a 2,000 square 1 foot International House of Pancakes (IHOP) restaurant on the street level and 93 parking spaces. The site is located in the Tourist (T) zoning district, and per Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code has a minimum parking ' requirement of 1 space per room and 7-15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of restaurant space. According to strict interpretation of the code, the existing hotel would require a minimum of 118 parking spaces and a maximum of 146 parking 1 spaces, therefore an apparent deficit exists. The redevelopment will increase the parking supply to 118 spaces, per code minimum. 1 The code provides for reducing the required number of parking spaces to recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater Beach. Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code allows a reduction in parking if the property 1 will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or adequate parking is available through existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the property. 1 City of Clearwater staff has recognized the Quality Inn is located directly on Clearwater Beach, in close proximity to the public beaches and the restaurant 1 attracts customers from the hotel itself as well as nearby hotels/motels and residential condominiums within walking distance, and there is great potential for "walk-up" customers. The parking lot is a private lot reserved for hotel guests and 1 patrons of the IHOP restaurant. This parking analysis was prepared to determine the availability of parking spaces. 1 Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. It was agreed GCC would conduct a parking accumulation study on a Friday between 6 PM and 10 PM, Saturday between 10 AM and 4 PM and 6 1 PM - 10 PM, Sunday between 10 AM and 4 PM and 6 PM to 9 PM. The study area included the Quality Inn parking lot only since public parking lots and on- street spaces are not in close proximity to the site 1 EAININ( a 1 20, UFVEL0Pf,:,EN7 SVCS 1 Ty QF r 3 1 V. EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONS ORIGINAL Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot counts between the hours of 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM on Friday November 5th, 2004, Saturday November 6th, 2004 between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM, and Sunday November 7th, 2004 between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM and 9:00 PM. Weather conditions were typical for early November with a high temperatures of 79 degrees and low temperatures of 59 degrees with clear skies. No rain was encountered at any time during the study. The Quality Inn parking lot was checked on the hour for the number of spaces that were occupied. The number of occupied spaces was noted and an hourly accumulated total was obtained. Friday November 5 , 2004 On Friday evening the Quality Inn was at 100% occupancy with all of the 94 rooms reserved. Parking demand did not vary significantly throughout the evening with 56 occupied spaces (60%) for most of the evening to a peak demand of 61 occupied spaces (66%) at 10:00 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 32 unused spaces in the study area throughout the evening. Table 1 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 4 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. Saturdav November 6. 2004 On Saturday evening the Quality Inn was at 100% occupancy with all of the 94 ' rooms reserved. Parking demand varied significantly throughout the day from a low of 43 occupied spaces (46%) at 8 PM to a peak demand of 72 occupied spaces (77%) at 10:00 AM. As such, there were a minimum of 21 unused spaces ' throughout the day. Table 2 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 5 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. Sunday November 7, 2004 ' On Sunday evening the Quality Inn was at 99% occupancy with 93 of the 94 rooms reserved. Parking demand in the study area varied moderately throughout ' the day with a low of 54 occupied spaces (58%) at 12:00 Noon, and a peak demand of 73 occupied spaces (78%) at 9:00 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 20 unused spaces throughout the day. Table 3 provides an hourly tabulation ' and Figure 6 provides a graph of the hourly parking space occupancy. p 1 C' ;p 1005 d t SJCS? _QIyr 4 1 TIME 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TABLE 1 FRIDAY, NOVEMBERS, 2004 QUALITY INN LOT OCC. TOTAL % OCCUPIED 60 93 65% 56 93 60% 56 93 60% 56 93 60% 61 93 66% ORIGINAL L? l5 « ,l ij l - JU 01 2005 11. DEvl' ti OPK.ic_ 1•41- Svc FIGURE 4 - FRIDAY NOVEMBER 5, 2004 0 a 100 90 80 o CO) W 70 v 60 Q 50 -?- Series1 40 v 30 j O 20 10 CD 0 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TIME OF DAY ORIGINAL TIME 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TABLE 2 SATURDAY NOVEMBER 6, 2004 QUALITY INN LOT OCC. TOTAL % OCCUPIED 72 93 77% 55 93 59% 51 93 55% 58 93 62% 56 93 60% 60 93 65% 54 93 58% 51 93 55% 50 93 54% 43 93 46% 56 93 60% 65 93 70% '2005 s LANNING3 Dt VrCr.<<?h??? l 8'JCS. _-CITY QF FIGURE 5 - SATURDAY NOVEMBER 6, 2004 co w v a a co 0 W o. v V O 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 .Op .Op .Op .Op .Op .Op .Op .Op .Op .Op .p O .Op gyp. ??. icy. 1v ?. p. ?. p. .`. cb. p. Np. TIME OF DAY -*-Series 1 TABLE3 ORIGINAL SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2004 TIME 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM QUALITY INN LOT OCC. TOTAL % OCCUPIED 65 93 70% 61 93 66% 54 93 58% 57 93 61% 62 93 67% 61 93 66% 56 93 60% 71 93 76% 65 93 70% 69 93 74% 73 93 78% PLAN 1NU FIGURE 6 - SUNDAY NOVEMBER 7, 2004 100 90 80 70 N U' 60 a a w uui 50 FL v 40 O 30 20 10 0 J Z l\ z - FF? F C N3w O Otis cm r:;;71 1-4- Series1 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM TIME OF DAY ORIGINAL ' VI. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT ' The proposed modifications would result in 118 on-site parking spaces. The hotel would require 118 to 146 parking spaces according to strict interpretation of the code. Assuming the worst case, a minimum of 45 parking spaces (118-73) would ' be available to satisfy any increased demand created by the restaurant expansion. Assuming the 1,500 s.f. restaurant expansion requires between 7-15 spaces per 1,000 s.f. the increased demand would be between 11 and 23 spaces. Therefore, ' adequate parking will be available to support the proposed redevelopment. VII. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology ' established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates traffic operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways would continue at acceptable levels of service and the impact is minimal. This analysis also ' demonstrates of the 93 parking spaces included on-site, a maximum of 73 were occupied during any hour of the study period. As such, the hotel and restaurant parking demands, are satisfied although parking supply is below code ' requirements. With the redevelopment increasing the parking supply to 118 spaces, future expansion of the restaurant can easily be accommodated. 1 J Us _.01 2005 PLANNING/& DEVEL F rH '- ? SVGS 5 ORIGINAL. "PE"IXA . ?? r? p 1 200 ? ?.; Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 _-M U5 l Q ' 6?,T AILED REPORT General Information I ` ,Site Information Analyst RP JUL Q' 2005 I ?1 Agency or Co. GCC _.? Date Performed 1118/ 0 4 --- Time Period PM P tai:: `.ICS Intersection S. GULFVIEW/HAM. I R V Area Type All other areas [G 'Jurisdiction CLEARWA TER Analysis Year 2004 EXISTING Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 27 303 248 345 255 6 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 - 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 . Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 120 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N" N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing B Only -F EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timin LG 0 G= 24.0 G G G= 17.0 G G G g = 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 60.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 28 319 261 237 268 6 Lane group capacity, c 613 1087 745 633 501 449 v/c ratio, X 0.05 0.29 0.35 0.37 0.53 0.01 Total green ratio, g/C 0.58 0.58 0.40 0.40 0.28 0.28 Uniform delay, di 5.6 6.3 12.6 12.7 18.2 15.5 i file: //C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k22.... 11/8/2004 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.1 0.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 5.6 6.4 12.8 13.1 19.3 15.5 Lane group LOS A A B B B B Approach delay 6.4 13.0 19.2 Approach LOS A B B Intersection delay 12.4 Xc = 0.37 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e ORIGINAL ,.y 1 r "1 `ll ? y 1 ? i i t I ;1 ?c 01 2005 ?t? file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20 S ettings\Temp\s2k22.... 11/8/2004 I W* Nolimwli?E ;I Page 1 of 2 ORIGINAL. n 1, 11, 1 [1 0 1 2 . I 7 O-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY it-t`•. ,•) t ?. l 'S V C' Site Information @ '= Analyst RP Agency/Co. GCC Date Performed 11/11/2004 ' Project Description East/West Street: S. GULFVIEW BLVD North/South Street: BAYWAY BLVD. ' Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound ' Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 49 509 0 0 467 0 ' Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 54 565 0 0 518 0 t Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 _ -- 0 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 ' Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ' Volume veh/h -0 0 0 1 0 126 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 140 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 2 0 2 ' Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 ' RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 ' Configuration L R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 54 1 140 ' Capacity, cm (vph) 1048 196 558 /c ratio 0.05 0.01 0.25 ' Queue length (95%) 0.16 0.02 0.99 [Analysis Time Period PM PEAK ' file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 11/11/2004 Intersection S. GULFVIEW/BAYWAY BLVD. Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Analysis Year 2004 EXISTING Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Control Delay s/veh 8.6 23.5 93.6 LOS A C g Approach delay s/veh) 13.7 pproach LOS - -- g HC32000rm Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d ORIGINAL KULoff 1-R?DT,rj 01 2005 PLANNING; 8 DEVi=LOPNar.;?i SVCc f file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 11/11/2004 Print Date: Nov/08/2004 Florida Department of Transportation ' Transportation Statistics Office 2003 Peak Season Factor Category Rep ort PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE ' Category: 1500 Week Dates SF PSCF 1 01/01/2003 - 01/04/2003 1.05 1.12 2 01/05/2003 - 01/11/2003 1.05 1.12 ' 3 01112/2003 - 01/18/2003 1.05 1.12 4 01/19/2003 - 01/25/2003 1.03 1.10 5 01/26/2003 - 02/01/2003 1.00 1.06 6 02/02/2003 - 02/08/2003 0.98 1.04 t * 7 02/09/2003 - 02/15/2003 0.96 1.02 * 8 02/16/2003 - 02/22/2003 0.95 1.01 * 9 02/23/2003 - 03/01/2003 0.94 1.00 10 03/02/2003 - 03/08/2003 0.93 0.99 * 11 03/09/2003 - 03/15/2003 0.93 0.99 * 12 03/16/2003 - 03/22/2003 0.93 0.99 13 03/23/2003 - 03/29/2003 0.93 0.99 * 14 03/30/2003 - 04/05/2003 0.93 0.99 * 15 04/06/2003 - 04/12/2003 0.93 0.99 * 16 04/13/2003 - 04/19/2003 0.94 1.00 17 04/20/2003 - 04/26/2003 0.95 1.01 * 18 04/27/2003 - 05/03/2003 0.96 1.02 * 19 05/04/2003 - 05/10/2003 0.97 1.03 ' 20 05/11/2003 - 05/17/2003 0.98 1.04 21 05/18/2003 - 05/24/2003 0.99 1.05 22 05/25/2003 - 05/31/2003 0.99 1.05 23 06/01/2003 - 06/07/2003 1.00 1.06 ' y' ^2, 06/08/2003 - 06/14/2003 1.00 1.06 06/15/2003 - 06/21/2003 1.01 1.07 06/22/2003 - 06/28/2003 1.00 1.06 +? % 06/29/2003 - 07/05/2003 1.00 1.06 - - 07/0612003 - 07/12/2003 1.00 1.06 29 07/13/2003 - 07/19/2003 1.00 1.06 6 U, ty ci FM S Vt?6 07/20/2003 - 07/26/2003 1.00 1.06 07/27/2003 - 08/02/2003 1.00 1.06 32 08/03/2003 - 08/09/2003 1.01 1.07 33 08/10/2003 - 08/16/2003 1.01 1.07 ' 34 08/17/2003 - 08/23/2003 1.02 1.09 35 08/24/2003 - 08/30/2003 1.03 1.10 3 7 08/31/2003 - 09/6/2003 1 1.04 1.11 ORIGINAL ' 3 09/07/2003 - 09/ 3/2003 1.04 1.11 38 09/14/2003 - 09/20/2003 1.05 1.12 39 09/21/2003 - 09/27/2003 1.04 1.11 40 09/28/2003 - 10/04/2003 1.04 1.11 ' 41 10/05/2003 - 10/11/2003 1.03 1.10 42 10/12/2003 -10/18/2003 1.02 1.09 43 10/19/2003 - 10/25/2003 1.03 1.10 ' 44 10/26/2003 - 11/01/2003 1.03 1.10 45 11/02/2003 - 11/08/2003 !r1.04 1.11 46 11/09/2003 - 11/15/2003 1.04 1.11 47 11/16/2003 - 11/22/2003 1.04 1.11 ' 48 11/23/2003 - 11/29/2003 1.05 1.12 49 11/30/2003 - 12/06/2003 1.05 1.12 50 12/07/2003 - 12/13/2003 1.05 1.12 ' 51 12/14/2003 - 12/20/2003 1.05 1.12 52 12/21/2003 - 12/27/2003 1.05 1.12 53 12/28/2003 - 12/31/2003 1.05 1.12 MOCF = 0.94 TABLE 4 - 4 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR TWO-WAY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'R IGINAL URBANIZED AREAS UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS FREEWAYS Level of Service Interchange spacing > 2 mi. apart Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided 180 620 1,210 1,720 2,370 Lanes A B C D E 4 Divided 1,940 3,140 4,540 5,870 6,670 4 2,310 3,840 5,350 6,510 7 240 6 Divided 2,900 4,700 6,800 8,810 10,010 , 6 3,580 5,930 8,270 10,050 11,180 STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS 8 4,840 8,020 11,180 13,600 15,130 Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) 10 6,110 10,110 14,110 17,160 19,050 Level of Service 12 7,360 12,200 17,020 20,710 23 000 Lanes Divided A B C D E , 2 Undivided ** 400 1,310 1,560 1,610 Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart 4 Divided 460 2,780 3,300 3,390 *_* Level of Service 6 Divided 700 4,240 4,950 5,080 *=* Lanes A B C D E 8 Divided 890 5,510 6,280 6,440 *** 4' 2,050 3,350 4,840 6,250 7,110 Class lI (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) 6 3,240 5,250 7,600 9,840 11,180 8 4,420 7,160 10,360 13,420 15,240 Level of Service 10 5,600 9,070 13,130 16,980 19 310 Lanes Divided A B C D E , 12 6,780 10,980 15,890 20,560 23 360 2 Undivided ** 180 1,070 1,460 1,550 , 4 Divided ** 390 2,470 3,110 3,270 6 Divided ** 620 3,830 4,680 4,920 BICYCLE MODE 8 Divided ** 800 5,060 6,060 6,360 (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below b number within primary city central business district of an y of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) urbanized area over 750,000) Paved Shoulder Level of Service Bicycle Lane Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E Coverage A B C D E 2 Undivided ** ** 500 1,200 1,470 049% ** ** 310 1,310 >1 310 4 Divided ** ** 1,180 2,750 3,120 , 50-84% ** 240 390 >390 *** 6 Divided ** ** 1,850 4,240 4,690 85-100% 300 680 >680 *** *** 8 Divided ** ** 2,450 5,580 6,060 PEDESTRIAN MODE Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and within (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway primary city central business district of an urbanized area geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians over 750,000) using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number Level of Service of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided ** ** 490 1,310 1,420 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** ** 1,170 2,880 3,010 049% ** ** ** 600 1 480. 6 Divided ** ** 1,810 4,350 4,520 , 50-84% ** ** ** 940 1 800' 8 Divided ** ** 2,460 5,690 5,910 , 85-100% ** 210 1,080 >1,080 *** NON-STATE ROADWAYS BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) Major City/County Roadways (Buses per hour) Level of Service (Note: Blues per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of higher traffic flow.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided ** ** 870 1,390 1,480 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** ** 2,030 2,950 3,120 0-84% ** >5 >4 >3 >2 6 Divided ** ** 3,170 4,450 4,690 85-100% >6 >4 >3 >2 >1 N'`= 11? a'4= C?3 ARTERIAL/NON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS Other Signalized Roadways DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED (signalized intersection analysis) (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) Level of Service Lanes Median Left Turns Lanes Adjustment Factors Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Divided Yes +5% 2 Undivided ** ** 450 950 1,200 2 Undivided No -20% 4 Divided ** ** 1,050 2,070 2,400 Multi Undivided Yes _5% Source: Florida Department of Transportation 02/22/02 Multi Undivided No -25% Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 ONE-WAY FACILITIES Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 Decrease corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 40% to http://wwwl I.myflorida.com/planning/systems/Sm/los/defaulLhtm obtain the equivalent one directional volume for one-way facilities. "This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be us d f id i d i e or corr or or ntersect on esign, where mom refined techniques exist Values shown are hourly two-way volumes for levels of service and are for the automebile/tmck modes unless specifically stated Level of service letter grade thresholds one probably not comparable across modes and therefore cross modal comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overa volumes must be divided by an appropriate K factor. The table's input value defaults and level , , ll roadway level of service is not recommended. To convert to annual average daily traffic volumes, time of service criteria appear on the following page Calculations a b ti d l i f li h Hi h . re ase ann on p ons o ng app ca t e g way Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck bicycle pedestrian and bus modes `' Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. , , . ...Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For automobileltruck modes, volumes grenter than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievabl be th i i . e, cause em s no max mum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. 91 ORIGINAL "PE"IIX B li pLMy"'..l.Y ?? .? Hotel (s,o) ORIG Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied On a: Weekday D'JI Ui ..01 2M5 ? i° Number of Studies: 4 , PLAWNG Average Number of Occupied Rooms: 216 ` 111^ ?.i 'IT Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8.92 4.14 - 17.44 6.04 Data Plot and 4,000 3,000 CO a c w 0- 1-- (D U 2,000 d ro N Q 1- 1,000 0 Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size ------------- -- --------- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 X = Number of Occupied Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given ---'- Average Rate R2=*k Trip Generation, 7th Edition 542 Institute of Transportation Engineers Resort Hotel (330) ORI r?e?tiTrip Ends vs: Occupied Rooms O On a: Weekday, i Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, ,5 fi ? One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. PLANNING & DEVELQP ,;1t+WT `VCS . -?tLumber of Studies: 10 verage Number of Occupied Rooms: 429 Directional Distribution: 43% entering, 57% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.49 0.27 - 0.72 0.70 Data Plot and Equation 500 400 c W a 300 F- CD U_ L d N m 200 Q 100 0 x x - . . ,--- --- ----- --. ---------- ---- - - - - - - x ______ .. __.X_ __ ..__-X __ __ __ ..:...... ............ _.._... x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 200 300 400 500 600 X = Number of Occupied Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 1.13 Ln(X) - 1.52 700 800 900 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.88 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 618 institute of Transportation Engineers High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant (932) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 14 ORIGINAL Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 7 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 127.15 73.51 - 246.00 41.77 Data Plot and Equation 1,500 1,400 1,300 y 1,200 c W d - 1,100 N U L a) 1,000 a? m 900 Q I I ~ 800 700 600 500 ------------ -------- --------- ----------- ------- .- ...... ;-.......-v=-'----- - --------- ------- X ------------------- ---------- --- ----------------°/----,-- ----- ---- X -.-.. •-_..----•----------•-'----'---.-.X---- X ; X --...----;-X--------- - -- ----...----------- ------------------ X - ; X ------------------------ X ------- ------- X x' -------------- --------- ------------ X 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation. Not given ------ Average Rate R2 _ **** Trip Generation, 7th Edition 1723 Institute of Transportation Engineers High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 93 ORIGINAL Avenra-1e -Yehicle Trip Ends vs: On a: JU a i ? 20 1 PLANNING 8 i7EVcI.() ; .4c: ri Y 90ber of Studies: ._-QTY .? ?. Q691 000 Sq. Feet GFA: Directional Distribution: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 pm. 8 6 61 % entering, 39% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 10.92 2.80 - 62.00 9.39 uata Fiot ana ' 22C 210 ' 200 190 180 ' 170 160 U) c 150 W ' o- 140 ~ 130 y U 120 m ' > 110 N co 100 90 Q 1! 80 70 ' 60 50 40 ' 30 20 ' 10 ---------- X -- . I ------------ ----- ---- ------ --- -- - - - --- - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - ,---- - - - - ;--X ------; •--------- ----- X X ---------- ------- ---- •X -------------- ------ ------------- X X X `' --- -- X X; X X ; x iX X - - - - - - - --- X ->§? -X------ ---?..- --- -- _ ---- -- ----- x X . X ---------- , .----- --,---- ;X -- ---- . . --. ---X-X -- --- -- . . --------- X' X ---- X 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X _' 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points.'. Fitted Curve Equation: Not given 11 12 13 14 --'--- Average Rate R2 = ,r... Trip Generation, 7th Edition 1725 Institute of Transportation Engineers Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS2000'D ETAILED REPORT General Information ; JV ite information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 11/11/ Time Period PM P JU .01 2005 tersection S. GULFVIEW / HAMDEN rea Type All other areas urisdiction CLEARWATER l i Y 2006 WITH P R I G . na ys s ear ROJE ?__.y ID . roject Volume and Timing 1 u LLEAREB 01 ,_,_,__, EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH., RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 28 323 266 369 278 6 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 120 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0- N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mn. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timin G= 7.0 G= 24.0 G= G= .0 G= 1 G= G= g Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= E=4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 60.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 29 340 280 262 293 6 Lane group capacity, c 597 1087 745 633 501 449 v/c ratio, X 0.05 0.31 0.38 0.41 0.58 0.01 Total green ratio, g/C 0.58 0.58 0.40 0.40 0.28 0.28 Uniform delay, di 5.7 6.4 12.7 12.9 18.5 15.5 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settin s\er olizzi.GCC\Local%20Settin s\T g rp g g emp\s2k4... 11/11/2004 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.18 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.8 0.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 5.7 6.5 13.0 13.4 20.2 15.5 Lane group LOS A A B B C B Approach delay 6.5 13.2 20.1 Approach LOS A B C Intersection delay 12.9 Xc = 0.40 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e ORIGINAL JU 01 1005 i? PLANMNG & DEVEU.:', Ri ENT SVCS1 _CITY Q__ QL file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k4... 11/11/2004 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 ORIGINAI ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information 1 -1 Analyst RP Agency/Co. GCC Date Performed 11/11/2004 Analysis Time Period PM PEAK Intersection S. GULFVIEW/ BAYWAY BLVD. Jurisdiction CLEARWATER nal sis Year 2006 WITH PROJECT ' Project Description East/West Street: S. GULFVIEW BLVD North/South Street: BAYWAY BLVD. ' Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound ' Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 51 550 0 0 505 0 t Peak-hour factor, PHF. 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 56 611 0 0 561 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 0 Median type Undivided ' RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R ' Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 1 0 130 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate ' veh/h ) 0 0 0 1 0 144 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 2 0 2 ' Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N ' Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 ' Configuration L R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 56 r , " ; 3 1 144 ' Capacity, cm (vph) 1010 - .. .. i ` 172 527 /c ratio 0.06 M i 200 0.01 0.27 Queue length (95%) 0.18 5 ? ..,, 0.02 1.10 ' file://C:\Documents%20 and%20Settin s?er olizzi.GCC\Local%20Settin s\Tem g P g g p\u2k4... 11/11/2004 Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Control Delay s/veh 8.8 26.1 14.4 LOS A D g Approach delay s/veh) - "' 14.5 pproach LOS - - g HCS2000T M Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d ORIGINAL file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 11/11/2004 Two-Way Stop Control Pagel of 2 ORIGINAL. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst RP Intersection ?;. UUL1-V1tW1 PHUJCGI A enc /Co GCC ENTRANCE g y . J i di Date Performed 19/11/2004 ur s ction CLEARWATER Y A l i sis Time Period Anal PMPEAK na ys s ear 2006 WITH PROJECT y - Project Description East/West Street: S. GULFVIEW BLVD. Nor th/South Street: NONE Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes a nd Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 525 26 17 505 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 583 28 18 561 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 - - 0 - - Median type Two Way Left Tum Lane RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T upstream signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T. R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound outhbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 11 12 Lane Configuration L olume, v (vph) 18 Capacity , cm (vph) 978 j /c ratio 0.02 1 111 UI 01 Queue length (95%) 0.06 N11W4jd. VWj, ;- „, file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20S ettings\Temp\u2k4... 11 / 11 /2004 Two-Way Stop Control ORIGINAL Page 2 of 2 Control Delay s/veh) 8.7 LOS A 4 _ Approach delay s/veh) _ ?- pproach LOS - - HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 11/11/2004 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 ORIGINAL. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst RP Intersection S. GULFVIEW/PROJECT A /C GCC EXIT gency o. J i di ti D t P f d 1111112004 ur s c on CLEARWATER a er orme e Y A l i Anal sis Time Period PM PEAK na ys s ear 2006 WITH PROJECT y Project Description East/West Street: S. GULFVIEW BLVD. N orth/South Street: PROJECT EXIT DRIVE Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 525 0 0 497 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 583 0 0 552 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 - - Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration T T U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 25 0 16 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 27 0 17 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LR Volume, v (vph) 44 Capacity, cm (vph) 462 I 11 /c ratio 0.10 ;IJL-,U Queue length (95%) 0.31 _ -' file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 11/11/2004 Two-Way Stop Control ORIGIINMIAL`°g' Control Delay s/veh 13.6 LOS g Approach delay (s/veh - - 13.6 pproach LOS - - g HCS2000TM Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d p ?00R0T R ' 10M , PLA.,.... m EX, .. .... C t1 `d L;i ' file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20S ettings\Temp\u2k4... 11/11/2004 ^a? ?+ ' ?'? ????s? ?? 0 nmoll, _ nn:my@Pugipi ?- W .. „? r+ e ' LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 September 30, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 ,Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-07072 - 645 - 655 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Ghovaee: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 6.3 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 6.8 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 17.6 feet (to open stairs) and from 20 feet to 8.8 feet (to pool deck), an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 99.5 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and the City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BiuJONSON, COMMISSIONER °EQUAI. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" , S September 30, 2005 Ghovaee - Page 2 3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 4. That any future signage meet the requirements of Code and any freestanding sign be a monument- style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 5. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 6. That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 8. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be amended to indicate the water feature adjacent to the ramp to the first level and berming toward the south driveway, coordinate landscaping with utilities between the ramp and front property line and to correct the number of plants in various areas of the landscape plan; 9. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 10. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 11. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; and 12. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building pen-nits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending