The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2005-05035 p L U5 uvL? JUL 2 9 2006 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENTSVO FLS2005-05035 2119 NE COACHMAN RD Date Received: 05/26/2005 BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION CO INC ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 280B PLANNER OF RECORD: R -T CLWCoverSheet 0 409-05 Permit ORIGINAL Keith Zayac Associates, Inn. 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keitKbkeithzayac. com July 26, 2005 LC Mr. Robert Tefft City of Clearwater Planning Department JUL 2 9 2 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 PV4NNIN dlf7l?Ait RE: FLS2005-05035-2119 NE Coachman Road-DRC Comments Dear Mr. Tefft: Please find 15 copies of the revised civil and architectural plans for your review. Also, additional requested material is attached. General Engineering: 1.) Where will solid waste containers (black barrels) be placed for pick-up by solid waste vehicles? On sheet 3 of 6, we are providing a 5'X10' black barrel staging area. Environmental: 2.) No Issues Fire: 3.) Drainage covers and grates in drive aisles must meet HS-20 specifications. On sheet 4 of 6 note number 7 has been added to the plans which state, "All drainage covers and grate inlets shall be a minimum of HS-20 specifications. Harbor Master: 4.) No Issues Legal: 5.) No Issues Land Resources: 6.) Show to be removed the declining 5", 6" Magnolia tree (Loquat) and the declining 3'cluster Jacaranda tree. Revise prior to building permit. 1 I:\\Bradley Construction\Documents\Response Letter 7-26-05-r.doc ORIIINAL409-05 Permit The 5" 6" Magnolia, & 3" Jacaranda cluster have been proposed to be removed. These changes are reflected on sheet 3 of 6. Landscaping: 3 } ?. 7.) No Issues i2JOUL Q 2005 Parks & Recreation: 8.) No Issues Stormwater: t w•'? ,. PLANNING CAT-Y of 9.) A. Applicant needs to meet City of Clearwater Drainage criteria. (25 yr/lbr storm event). SCS methodology with modified curve number will be accepted. (prior to building permit) Please see enclosed and revised drainage report B. Resubmitted drainage report needs to be signed and sealed. (Prior to building permit) Enclosed drainage reports are signed and sealed.. C. Provide FDOT and SWFWMD permits. Upon receipt from FDOT and SWFWMD, permits will be forwarded to City of Clearwater. Solid Waste: 10.) No Issues Traffic Engineering: 11.) No Issues Planning: 12.) The site plan is to include the location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening per section 3-201(D)(1) and index #701 A 5'x10' black barrel staging area is shown on sheet 3 of 6. Corresponding to note number 15 within general notes.. 2 I:\\Bradley Construction\Documents\Response Letter 7-26-05-r.doc Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. • ORIGINr1? STORM WATER NARRATIVE for BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC OFFICE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA IULI 2 9 I I 2005 t Description and Location u PLgN J 1 BVCS The project is located in Section 12; Township 29S; Range 15E and consists of 0.44 acres ?along the south right-of-way of Northeast Coachman within the City of Clearwater, Florida. The proposed project consists of one building, parking, and associated normally dry stormwater pond. Existing Conditions The existing site is undeveloped except for a single asphalt/shell drive. Currently, there is no stormwater pond or other storm water treatment facility on-site. Storm water runoff from the site sheet flows into the Swale along Northeast Coachman Road. Proposed Conditions The proposed project includes one building, sidewalks and paved parking totaling 10,695 ft2 of impervious area. Runoff will be directed to the dry pond located near the west of the proposed building. The normally dry pond will provide treatment and attenuation. Upon reaching the treatment elevation of 72.75, stormwater from the pond will flow into FDOT's swale. The pond treatment volume [803 ft3] recovers within 7.0 hrs. Stormmwater Criteria Per City of Clearwater,. treatment volume within the pond is provided for the entire site [803 ft3]. The City's attenuation. requirements are for the 25 yr - 1 hr event with only 50% credit for existing impervious areas, i.e. C = 0.21 for existing runoff calculations. As stacking of attenuation volume over treatment volume is not required by the City, an additional 984 ft3 is provided for attenuation (attenuation total volume of 1,787 ft). The proposed storm water management system will meet/exceed the. City's criteria. I:\Bradley construction\Correspondence\STORM WATER NARRATIVE for BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION CO. doc E • ORIGINAL FLS2005-05035 2119 NE COACHMAN RD Date Received: 05/26/2005 BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION CO INC ZONING DISTRICT: C - ?- ?? LAND USE: CG JUN °7 2005 jcW.r_. ATLAS PAGE: 280B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED MAY 2 6 2005 CLW CoverSheet PLNVW',?S DES"RTMENT Chy0'T`???'_t ?- ?? C i.1r11-c -.cuuD .t?LV !c oo rii nr.adIey rroperI, Ies 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue stir Clearwater, Florida 33755 - "Telephone: 727-592-4567 Fax; 727-562.4B65 0 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARI D APPLICATION CI SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans Q SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE 475.00 PfIA VU;16 44.% 4JZ I F U3 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED SY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING sDIST RiST: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT t PROPERTIES: NORTH: _ SOUTH: WEST: EAST: a NOTE: IS TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REOUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS/ FLEX113L.E STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPL14CA 1 I N A L (Revised 11/19/03) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code SeCtion 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: 5radiev Construction Co., Inc. MAILING A00RESS: ZUQ Drew Street. Claarwater. FI_ 33765 PHONE NUMBER: 727-442-311 7 FAX NUMBER: 727_-442-9693 PROPERTY OWNER(S): _ 1't=f- L16LE i? (Mus1 InLluda ALL owners as fisted on the dead - provide original slgnatura(e) on page 8) AGENT NAME: Keith I;, Zavac. P.E.. RLA MAILING ADDRESS, 701 Enterprise Road East. %g 404, $&IV Harbor FL 34695 ORIGINAI PHONE NUMBER. j?7=7@3-9886 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9A55 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: _ka thIMI(Olihaavac.com 8. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4.202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject Bite: N.E. Coachman Rd.. Clearwater FL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached survey - (if not listed here, please note ltte Iocpilon Qf 1Ns documont In the-submHt4l _ J PARCEL NUMBER: 1212flM5/5501010130/0002 PARCEL SIZE: O.aA acrag. 19.249.86s f JUN 0 7 2005 --.? (acres, square feet) 1..17 +. .. ... Tr. 41 :r -. «.. PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE($): 4,200 n Ir.. rz (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) rd: L fir: ?rL ?Y; DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): tleductlon In front setback to oarkina lot gayeMia8S Ld 15 feet. reduction,Injejgr setbaca to Parkina lot pavement Attach sheets and be specllit when Idenilfylno tho toques) (ineludo oll-requesfed code deviations. a. g: reduction In required numbers( parking spaces, specific use. etc. ) Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Appilcatlon- City of Clearwater jUil-'D-LUU0 wru 1L>00 rii adaey t'roperttes rHA nU., /,Ll 442' 4521 K U4 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIER) SITE PLAN? YES NO x (if yes, attach a copy or the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) - SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN APFiDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 8) D, WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) 2 Provide complete responses to the six (6) CENERAL APPLICA9ILiTY CRITERIA - Explain baw each criteria Is achieved, In detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties In which it is located. The proposed one story office is desia k to -s a In a t -Size and coverage as the surrounding acftMt office h„ildinna tom d nnr west and south of the property. Tha building is a one story block building wLb,?quirad waved parklno lot and landscaped areas The stormwater pond Is a noLMMI dry massed relantlen area with a landscaped buffer surroundino the Bond butidina and narking lot above minimum standards 2. The proposed development Wit not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly Impair the value thereof, The one story office bulidina Is daveloped to be the Ideflticni use as the a?jaeent EL eriias which will be cohesive wlih tha surrounding laand uses and bulldjggs, J buiidino will be upgMded with architeelwal enhancements ap4 be at or above the exlstlrlo offlca bulldina auaitM 3. The pfpposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working In the neighborhood of the proposed use. Since the use is similar to the surrounding buildktgs it will be compatible with a aurroundlnQ, neighborhood uses, The parking 14 contained 20tlrtyly on-slte with one agrasalingress driveway to minims traffic movements Ig the adjacent roadway. A new sidewalk Is bola CgngMcted The proposed development is designed to 29 fool radii. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the. immedlats-vtcin)fy of the parcel proposed for development; The eronosed development Is designed wi h an identical office land 1J-%A IQ the Immediate vlclnlttv. O B. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Since-the oroiect is being developed as an office the hours oj000fatlon Is be similar to the adiacsngrnderties There are no nronosed outside aciviles other than parking associated with the development to minimize acoustic andnlfactarv trrana ra The parking lot is surrounded by a vegetativehuffer Including shrubs and ttaea to screen any visual Impacts from i3arked cars. Z Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed In each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate shoots as necessary) - Explain 12ow each criteria Is achieved, In dotal)' See attachment A for responses to the aopUcMhle flexibility criteria for office fang usa \ .. i J ?. gini; J i'Y tut ?+w'rK ?-5-+,•..?.« ,m-??Y Page 2 of 6- Flexible Standard DevelopmentAppikatlon- City of Clearwater Iirtt-cu-cuw wcu l?.uo rJl raoley rropertmeS rein BU, 46 qqe 46Z] Y. Ub E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (City of Clearwater Desl0n Criteria Manual and /4.202.A.21) mT STORMWATER PLAN Including the following requirements; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading lnefudlng finisnad floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets. and.municipat storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retendon area Including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calcutattons for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professlanat Englneer-on all plans and calculations COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval Is required prior to Issuance of City Building Permit), If applicable rd COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM-TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, it applicable F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4.202.A) £f SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - one original and 14 coplea; TREE SURVEY (including existing treason site and. wlthln..25' of the adjacent site, by species: size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, /Including drip lines and Indicating trees to be removed) - please doslgn around the existing (reps; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; U'rPARKiNG DEMAND STUDY In conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards lie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to Y the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used In determining whether or not deviations to the -` parking standards are approved;. tJ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; Q PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be Issued until evidence of recording a final plat 16 provided); Q COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL. REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4.202.A) of SITE PLAN with the following Information. (not to. exceed.24." x 36."); All dimensions; North arrow; ORIGINAL _ Englnseflng bar scale (minimum scale one Inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet raterencing individual sheets Included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, Including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habliats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, Including flre hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and Ilft stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3.201(D)(1) and index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of off onsite and offslte storm-water management facilities; T Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and - "' Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. /SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed. development, in writtenitabular form: - Land area In square feet and acres; JUN 0 7 2005 Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling unhs; Gross floor area devoted to each use; .* • r_ ^ - i.-^ !' Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; s '•i-?' • • + raua o yr v ^ riaxwfa aranuisto utsveropmenr nppncanort- any ur uwarwarer lint-cD-.cuuo w.ir.u 1.c,Da rtl radley rropertles PBA NU, 16 94.C 9,3L1 r, Ub Total-paved-area; Including-all-paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehleular area; Size and specles of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; impermeable surface ratio attd _/ Moor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential us9s. d REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 'A X 11) and color rendering If possible; Q `OR OZ VELOI'MENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevationson. site; Offsile elevations If required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree jnventork; prepared bv.a."Certifled..arhorlst" of all -trees 8" DBH ornreater.reflecting size e H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) tsT LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed. structures: - Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas Including swales. side slopes and bottom elevations; - Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of ail parking areas Including landscaping Islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and Immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, Including ddpline (as indicated on required tree survey);. Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) Indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, Including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, Indicated by a key relafing to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including Instructions, soli mixes, baekfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing In both square feet and percenlage covered; _ Conditions of a previous development approvat.(e,g. conditions imposed by the Community. Development Board);. irrigation notes. raj REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8-Ya X 11-) (color rendering If possible); ORIGINAL a IRRIGATION PLAN (requlred for level two and three approval); CI COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4.202.A.23) Required In the event the application Includes a development where design standards are in Issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Intill Project. /BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -ell sides of all buildings Including height dlmensions, colors and materials; 0--**`REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of bullding with colors and materials to scale (8"%: X TI) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as requlred. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 191. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) j?-??Pffirq-(TE fttV-A'`G 6 A-) O All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimenslona (area, height, etc.); Indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. 0 All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details Including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall Include the street address (numerals).. 0-1*'Comprehenslve Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). 41J Ml ( WAa-,. D Reduced signage proposal (8 ''A X 11) (color), If submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. Page 4 of 5 - Flexlblo Standard Development Application- City of Clearwater JUN 0 7 2005 e JIM all cuvv w.LV ic,?)o it?duley rro.pertles fl}A AU, 6 44L 4JL1 r, u t K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4.801.C) P f? du 41-ulde as required if proposed development wilt degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted In the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4.801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurets to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described !n this application.-1 ^ -I- Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ? Sworn to and subsctibed before this dlt of A.A. 2 l to m and/or by arm5ti 1s oersonaHy known ti produced as identification. Y)-AJ 1 '--1 LIE Notary pubic, My commission expires: Dori A. Lindslev > apires April 15, 2007 Bonded Ttnu Atlas ar Boading Co., inc ORIGINAL JUN 0'7 2005 a Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application-City of Clearwater, r ??? ~- • fltfl-C?-CllUD WtU 1L;00 r r.adiey rropert ies PHA p11_1,11 uq/ a L1 f`. UZ AFFIDAVIT I, Peter Makris, owner of property located at 2119 NE Coaclitnan. Rd. Clearwater, FL authwize William R. Cosgray, Certified General Contractor Lie #I-CGC058405, of Bradley Construction Co., and/or Keith F. Zayac, P.E. to act as representatives to Sign on my behalf for Building Pen-nits, SW.D permits and FDOT permits for the above listed property. State of Florida County of Pinellas The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 25`' day of May, 2005, by.Peter Makris. He is personally known to me and did .not take an oath Peter Makris ?>(otary 0 Dori A. Lindsle Commission # 001900 t3 Expires April 15, 2007 %vjF. aF : Bonded T$ru ?''?°. Atlantic Boadin g Co., inc, ORIGINAL JUN 0 7 2005 ? w ATTACHMENT A Fnu OFFICLS FrJLEIli1\1 J. 11 1vTBn,[ ITY C"T\1L 11. 1'Vl\ OFFICES 1'?J l . Side and Rear Setback Reduction a. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles. The requested rear setback reduction for pavement allows for a 5-foot wide sidewalk to the rear entrance of the building. The sidewalk extends from the proposed parking lot that is designed with adequate drive isle width (24 feet) and entrance radii to accommodate emergency vehicles. b. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. The requested rear setback reduction for pavement allows for the required parking to be placed on the site without. any parking space reduction requests. The building is set on the property to incorporate all standard setback requirements. The parking lot is designed with only one driveway access request to minimize traffic congestion and access points to the adjacent roadway. c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise requested. The required 10-foot buffers for the project are maintained around the entire perimeter of the site including the rear pavement reduced setback request. The landscaping is enhanced by providing a required hedge around the parking lot, but also around the proposed building and stormwater pond. The proposed open space significantly exceeds the required open space.. ORIGINAL JUN 07 2005 0 r L RIGINAL , FLS2005-05035 2119 NE COACHMAN RD Date Received: 05/26/2005 BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION CO INC ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 280B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED RECEVED KV 2 ) 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CLWCoverSheet MAY-25-2005 AD 12:58 PM Bradley Pr P*nnkv 100 South Myrtle A ?,??? Clearwater, Florida Telephone: 727-582.1 U Fax: 727-562.4065 t i es....?.:.-,. ".. FAX NO. 727 442 4321 P. 03 ORIGINA SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION Q SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL. APPLICATION Including 1) cobted, 2) stapled and 3) folded sett of site plans Q SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE 475. rs CASE#: D, ATE RECEIVED: 42-1& a RECEIVED Sy (staff s): ATLAS PAGE #: 2 er ? ZONING DlSTRLCT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION'? SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NWt4: W SOUTH: C- WEST: EAST: i NOTE: IS TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REOUiRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 11118/03) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT,. A. APPLICANT. PROPER'T'Y OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Cods Section 4-202.A) Pic- ?APPLICANT NAME. Oradtev Construction Co.. tnc. -)? I ?MAIUNG ADDRESS; 21.20 Drew street, Claamaw, FL 11 ,/PHONE NUMBER: W-442-3117 FAX NUMBER: 727.442.9693 MAY 2 6 2005 ? PROPERTY OWNER(S): _tx- PLANN11MG DEPARTA (Mus1 include ALL owrrars as Haled on the dead - pnwlda anginal cignatura(s) on perre 8) _ •- _ - ,i AGENT NAME: Kelth R. Zovac. P.E.. RLA J MAILING ADDRESS,. 7D1 Enteinrise Road East. AM-404, .SIety Harbor. FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER. 727 783,9M FAX NUMBER: 727-793-0"5 J CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: kaltht7 MIthzavac,com S. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4.202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: _N.t;. Coachman Rd.. Clearwater. FL i LEGAL DESCRIPTION. See attg&ed survey (if not listed here, plum note Ora lamlon-ot itu documant in the "mm*) v PARCEL NUMBER: 12/20/15/5S@1@I000l0002 PARCEL SIZE: .44 a o (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 4,200 sf office huiir0no _ (number of dwelling units, hoist roams or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): reduction In front setback to parkins lot eavertta?t 5 feet reduction in •eAt.Att,Aryt to nattrMm lot pa,roMent Atlach shoots and be specifk when idenlifging LAO raquest (Include all requested coda deviatrornk a. a. reduction in required numberof pandng spaces, specific use. oft.) to 10 feet. Page 1 of 6 - ReAble, Slenderd Development Appllcatlotr- City of Clearwater OBSOLETE MY-25-2005 WED 12',58 Pl'1 Bradley Properties FAX NO. 727 442 1321 P, 04 ORIGINA DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLYAPPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVi;D (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES No x (if yes, attach.a copy o he applcable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) Z SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see Page 8) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) 2 Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain j9w each criteria is achieved, in details 1. Thep opdosed development of the land wilt be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties In which It The ro story office is do-s-4rigd to a In c ve e aftent office buildings Iggated t west and . I he property The huddina is a one story-block building with muired Paved oarkt o lot and ?sndscape?i arwas• The stormwater Pond is a notmalLdrv rrrassed retentlen areA YAM a tandseagml 6u ffer Q„?oundina the rwnd +H,ltdin D i na tot above r?tnlmum standards 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly Impair the value thereof, The one story office butidino is developed to be the [dendml use as the adiACa properties, whleh Wit be cohesive, with the sumo tend uses and buliftm..fhe building will be u=ffided with archite•gNtal enhancements and be at or above the exisgag 2f fte iftm ual ft 3. The proposed development WO not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or worsting in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Since the use Is similar to the sun indin^ uildinns it wNl be MWatibte with the aurroundlnq neighborhood uses The Paridag Is cured entirely on-site with one Mr-slinaress driveway to miniunko traffic movoMantt_s t? the adiacent road Wv Anew sidewalk is halr+e ce+.gfn,rtPd aloe the front of the Woaer<v to gpcouraas safe nadastdan movement 4. The proposed development Is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The Proposed gftMn tot is designed with one drlvawav to access the on rile oarkina The ddveM I4 de ned to be 24 feat wide VAJh 28 foot r 5. The proposed development Is consistent with the community character of the immedlate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development, The oronosed development Is dasignad with an identical offca land use to the Immediate vleinltty. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and flours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Sktce the proiect is being devo oa W As at, office the hours of operation Is be similar to the adjacent rooerties There ire no =nosed outside ates other than 2J*Mo associated with the daveloRmOM ID mfnimizt# acoustic and obotorv Imeat:ts The partdrb lot is surrounded by a veaelative buffer including shrubs and Imes to screen any visual Impacts from oarked cars Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as Ilsted In each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate shoats as necessary) - Explain h ft each criteria is achieved. In detalt' Se"itachment A for responses to the aoallrAble ftax Wity criteria for office land use -mv 2 6 SR) Page 2 of 6-Flexible Standard DevelopmentApplIcation- City of Cteerwater PLANNIN DEPARTMENT OS CU OF CLEAMNATER MAY-25-2005 WED 12:58 P1'l Bradley Properties FAX NO, 727 442 4321 P. 05 ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (City of Clearwater DesigA Criteria. Mantaai and /4.202.A.21) fib STORMWATER PLAN Including the following requirements; Exiting topography extending SO feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading Including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storrn systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stornw ater calculations for attenuation and water quality; / Signature of Florida registered Professkmat Engineer on all plans and calculations tY COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL -/ (SWFWMD approval Is required prior to Issuance of City Building Permit), If applicable I? COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM. TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4.202.A) l/ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal desoriptio n of property) - One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing treason site and within 2`f' of the adjacent site, by species, size (D8H 4" or greater), and location, /Including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - plaese design around the existing trass: v /,LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; rPARi(ING DEMAND STUDY In conjunction with a request to make devotions to the parking standards lie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to I r the submittal of We application, ft methodology of such study shalt be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be to accordance wigs accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used In determining whether or not davlationti to the parking standards are approved: is/ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; Q PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be Issued until evidence of recording a final plat Is provided); O COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (Section 4-202.A) r, .. M SITE PLAN with the following information (not to. exceed. 24" x 3r): J C? _ All dimensions; -- NMI% arrow; J _ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale-one inch equals so feet), and date prepared; MAY 2 6 2005 _ Location map; Index sheet referencing Individual sheets Included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; PINr! yl?G DEPAT?ViEi?T Footprint and size of ail PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; CI TV CL Eli'.? f.rAll existing and proposed points of access; All required sight tdangres; J _ Identification of environmentally unique areas; such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, arc; / _ Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of--way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, Including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; i All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; / Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot lnterfor landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycilng or trash handling areas and outstdtr mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201 (D)(0 and Index #101); ? Location of all landscape material; ? Location of allonsite and offelte stomYwater management facilities; ? Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and ? r Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. a /SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed-development, In writtenttabular form. ?® ? Land area In square feet and acres; ?''Qy _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; YY Number of PROPOSED dwelling units. i Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces; total number, presented In tabular form with the number of required spaces; Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application- City of Clearwater MAY-25-2005 WED 12:50 PM Bradley Properties FOX NO. 727 992 9321 P, 06 _i Total Aaved eras, ItteNdina-all-paved-parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and ercentage of the paved vehicular area, Size and species of of landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Ruilding and structure heights; y Impermeablee surface ratio (i.S.R.); and w- ... , Floor area raft (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. R1=DUCED SITE PLAN to scale (e 'A X 11) and color rendering If possible: Q FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional Milwirtaforl on site plan: - One-foot contours or spot elevations on site:. _ Offsile elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retalning watts and- earth beans: Lot fines and building Ones (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); SuIlding and structural setbacks (dimensioned): Structural overhangs; ORIGINAL H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) J??_i_z? tV'l{ Ge, LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures: 1005 Names of abutting streets; MAY 2 fi - Drainage and retention areas Including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; UDellneation and dimensions of an required perimeter landscape buffers; p ?l?;? DEPARTMENT Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas Including landscaping Islands and curbing; CITY OF - CL _PRIRATER Proposed and required paklhg spaces; Existing trees on-site and Immediately adjacent to the she, by species, size and locations, including dripMe (as indicated on rebuked tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) Indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials. Including botanical and common /tames; ? - Location. size, and quanftlea of all existing and proposed landscape materials. Indicated by a key totaling to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including Instructions, soil mixes, backtlOing, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing I1 both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community_ Development Board);. irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale(g`h X 11) (color rendering if posstbi*X OBSOLETE O IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); 0 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. 1. BUILDING ELEVA71ON PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4.202JL23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are In laws (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infll Redevelopment Project or a Residential In ill Project. ILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings Including height dimensions, colors and materials: " REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides- of building-with colors and materials to scale (8 Xi X'11) (black and white and Color f8ndertng, If posslbl9) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Suction 3-1808) 50?ftTA-a-_- Gt6tN10A) O All EXISTINO freastanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), Indicate Whether they will be removed or to remain. 0 All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide delafs including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs /shall Include the street address (numerals).. 9. Comprehsnslve Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). 12? f6 4iff M1 rU0:j,7> W [;L O Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), If submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application- City of Cleanarater MAY-25-2005 WED 12:59 PM Bradley Properties FAX NO, 727 442 4321 P, 07 • • ORIGINAL K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4.601.0) P/ ttlude as repulred If proposed development wig degrade the aCcupteble level of service for any roadway as adopted In the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation EngineWs, Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described In this application. -o, Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ? Sworn to and subscribed before this day of Ny _ A.D. 20 andlor by s etsonaHy know produced as Identification. Notary public, Mytrornmisskmexpires! ??•?RYp?,,,. Dori A. Lindslev Expires April 15, 2007 Bonded Thru Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. MAY 2 6 2005 PLAiNWRIG DEPAWMEMT CR O CLEARWATER Page 5 of 6 - Flexible. Standard Development Application-City of Clearwater nAY-25-2005 WED 12:59 PM Bradley Properties AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: owners on deed - FAX .NO, 727 442.9321 . _ . ,.... P, 08 - GRIGINIA a 1. That 0 MANN are) the owner(s) and record title holder(a) of the fot>owing described property (address or general location): Z 11./ ilVin: 6a4Z HAA-) V--<7 2. That this property constttutaS the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Reduction to front pavement setback to 15 feet and. rear pavement setback to 10 feet.. 3. That the undersigned (hasthave) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; b, That this affidavit has been executed to MUM the City of Clearwater, Flortde to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to tha property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this.appAcadon; 6. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregokta is We and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner o3SO Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS MOM me the undersigned, an officer duty commissioned by a taws of the State of Florida, an this Zs w day of MA Y . W y f peremlly appeared P w'"- /y~15 who having been first duty sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully undwsland& ft contents of. the affidavit #of hetshe signed. My Commission Expires: A. Litldsley ,_ , r -andg? > ;?,ts?.? ,q?tldad.4 ByP;adur?C?o..ffin. E ice/ • I.."'-_ MID 3:1PrartMrtp DoparfmoMlAppticatton FamstdvvafopmnM reviewVloxitrla srarrdatd devetopmBM 9/Jplkdgert 2QD3.a0si IW 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CL-Q1fiJATER Pape 6 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application- City of Clearwater MAY-25-2005 WED 12;5$ H Bradley Properties is FAX X 727 442 4321 F. 02 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT I, Peter Makris, owner of property located at 2119 NE Coachman Rd. Clearwater, FL authorize William R. Cosgray, Certified General Contractor Lic #I-CGCO58405, of Bradley Construction Co., and/or Keith E. Zayac, P.E. to act as representatives to Sign on my behalf for Building Pon-nits, SWD permits and FDOT permits for the above listed property. State of Florida County of Pinellas The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 25"' day of May, 2005, by Peter Makris. He is personally known to ixie and did not take an oath. Peter 1VMakris Notary YPVDori A. Lindsley ?=or ' ,.Commission # DD190043 Expires April 15, 2007 F,Bonded Thru rru.I Atlantic Boading Co., inc„ :)VOVI MAY 2 6 2005 PLANNING DEPARTVIENr Cff V OF CF 11114 r i ! - - OR161NAL ATTACHMENT A FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR OFFICES 1. Side and Rear Setback Reduction a. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles. The requested rear setback reduction for pavement allows for a 5-foot wide sidewalk to the rear entrance of the building. The sidewalk extends from the proposed parking lot that is designed with adequate drive isle width (24 feet) and entrance radii to accommodate emergency vehicles. b. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. The requested rear setback reduction for pavement allows for the required parking to be placed on the site without any parking space reduction requests. The building is set on the property to incorporate all standard setback requirements. The parking lot is designed with only one driveway access request to minimize traffic congestion and access points to the adjacent roadway. c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise requested. The required 10-foot buffers for the project are maintained around the entire perimeter of the site including the rear pavement reduced setback request. The landscaping is enhanced by providing a required hedge around the parking lot, but also around the proposed building and stormwater pond. The proposed open space significantly exceeds the required open space. MAY 2 6 2005 PLWIM S D132AR1IRAWT CttY OF CU:i 7111AP9 I ORIGINAL BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. OFFICE BUILDING STORMWATER CALCULATIONS Prepared by: Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road East, Ste. 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 MAY 2 6 2005 Date: May 2005 PLANNIMC DEPARTMENT CI V OF C ,y,. ?" ?'JER BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION OFFICE STORMWATER CALCULATIONS ORIGINAL EXISTING CONDITIONS: Description Area itz x C = 5-CA pavement 262 0.98 256.8 building 0 0.98 - pond 0 1.00 - open area 18,989 0.20 3,797.8 CPMP = 0.21 PROPOSED CONDITIONS: Description Area fiz x C= pavement 6,495 0.98 6,365.1 building 4,200 0.98 4,116.0 pond 2,715 1.00 2,715.0 open area 5,840 0.20 1,168.0 Cprop = 0.75 HISTORIC PEAK DISCHARGE: t = 10 mins A = 0.440 acs i = 8.5 in/hr C = 0.21 Q = CiA = 0.8 cfs 25 YEAR STORM D I P S R REQUIRED STORAGE Rainfall Duration Intensity (in/hr) Peak Run-Off Storm Release (CO Min Sec FDOT Zone VI Q = CiA (cfs) D x P (cf) D x H (cf) S - R 10 600 8.5 2.80 1,682 473 1,209 15 900 7.3 2.41 2,166 709 1,458 20 1200 6.5 2.14 2,572 945 1,627 30 1800 5.4 1.78 3,205 1,418 1,787 40 2400 4.6 1.52 3,640 1,890 1,750 50 3000 4.0 1.32 3,957 2,363 1,594 60 3600 3.6 1.19 4,274 2,836 1,438' 90 5400 2.8 0.92 4,986 4,254 732 ?7W44 Z- 4 4Av -) = 798, 60 ?y-Ti X-0 rjFe> 0.4 r-r w = o 7.64---_ MAY 2 6 2005 PLA NNING DEPARTMENT Cz EV CAE C! ,?s,?,?r? iE? I II Staae-Storaae-Perimeter Project Name: Bradley Construction Office Project Number: -off..., . Designer. kez Date: ..,, Comments: () (ft) (ft3) Area @ Top of Bank(TOB): 3,249.7 Elevation: 74.00 Volume: 3,828 Area @ Design High Water(DHW): 2,715.3 Elevation: 73.60 Volume: 2,635 Area @ Design Low Water(DLW): 1,579.8 Elevation: 72.75 Volume: 809 Area @ Bottom/Normal Water L?evel(BOT/NWL): 577.8 Elevation: 72.00 Volume: 0 STAGE AREA VOLUME! STAGE AREA VOLUME TREATMENT (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) VOLUME: 809 ft3 72.00 577.8 0.0 73.00 1,913.8 1,245.8 72.04 631.3 24.2 73.04 1,967.2 1,323.4 ATTENUATION 72.08 684.7 50.5 73.08 2,020.6 1,403.2 VOLUME: 1,825 W 72.12 738.1 79.0 73.12 2,074.1 1,485.1 72.16 791.6 109.6 73.16 2,127.5 1,569.1 72.20 845.0 142.3 73.20 2,180.9 1,655.3 72.24 898.5 177.2 73.24 2,234.4 1,743.6 72.28 951.9 214.2 73.28 2,287.8 1,834.0 72.32 1,005.3 253.3 i 73.32 2,341.3 1,926.6 72.36 1,058.8 294.6 73.36 2,394.7 2,021.3 72.40 1,112.2 338.0 73.40 2,448.1 2,118.2 72.44 1,165.6 383.6 73.44 2,501.6 2,217.2 72.48 1,219.1 431.3 73.48 2,555.0 2,318.3 72.52 1,272.5 481.1 73.52 2,608.4 2,421.6 72.56 1,325.9 533.1 G? 73.56 2,661.9 2,527.0 72.60 1,379.4 587.2 73.60 2,715.3 2,634.5 72.64 1,432.8 72 643.4 73.64 2,768.7 2,744.2 .68 1,486.3 701.8 ?; ? ` 73.68 2,822.2 2,856.0 72.72 1,539.7 762.3 +? , 73.72 2,875.6 2,970.0 72.76 1,593.1 825.0 r- 0 L-1 73.76 2,929.1 3 086.1 72.80 1,646.6 889.8 i ` rte ?- 73:80 2,982.5 , 3 204.3 C) 72.84 1,700.0 956.7 N '- C = 73.84 3,035.9 , 3,324.7 72.88 1,753.4 1,025.8 cr, I' is 73.88 3,089.4 3,447.2 72.92 1,806.9 1,097.0 Ail M 73.92 3,142.8 3,571.8 72.96 1,860.3 1,170.3 73.96 3,196.2 3,698.6 -? 74.00 3,249.7 3,827.5 Z MODRET ORIGINAL SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PROTECT NAME : BradleyConstiruction POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS INCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Design High Water Level Elevation Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/Exfiltration Trench Hydraulic Control Features: 72.00 ft2 800.00 ft3 4.00 67.40 ft 70.00 ft 72.00 ft 72.00 ft 72.75 ft 0.11 10.70 ft/d 2.00 16.00 ft/d 0.14 1.00 Top Bottom Left Right Groundwater Control Features - Y/N N N N N Distance to Edge of Pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Elevation of Water Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Impervious Barrier - Y/N N N N N Elevation of Barrier Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ?lui????? "'D MAY 2 6 2005 P AWCEM r w1,ZTMENT Analysis Date: 5/25/2005 • MODRET • ORIGINAL SUMMARY OF RESULTS PR03ECT NAME : BradleyConstruction CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) 00.00-0-00 70.000 0.000 0.00000 0.00 70.000 0.02680 0.02497 1.99 72.583 0.02315 0.00 0.01510 10.74 72.137 0.01179 0.00 0.00847 15.51 72.000 0.00723 0.00 0.00598 28.24 71.710 0.00531 0100 0.00463 36.99 71.573 0.00420 0.00 0.00378 45.75 71.461 0.00348 0.00 0.00318 54.50 71.368 0.00295 0.00 0.00273 63.25 71.287 0.00256 0,00 0.00239 72.00 71.216 0.00 ------------ I15 ? ? r _ L7 U L.?3? ? - 4 / : 1 Maximum Water Elevation: 72.583 feet @ 1.99 hours MAY 2 6 Mery @ 15.513 hours * Time increment when there is no runoff Maximum Infiltration Rate: 2.023 ft/day Analysis Late: :)/ZD/Zuu? 0 0 ORIGINAL peps Report of Geotechnical Exploration Bradley Office Clearwater, Florida Phillips Engineering Project No. 05-022 MAY 2 6 2005 C'? Q.: CL:''.:1,? ?r?rD PA h s NEERING?NC. May 16, 2005 P.E. Project No. 05-022 Mr. Bill Cosgray, President Bradley Construction Company, Inc. 2120 Drew Street Clearwater, Florida 33765 Report of Geotechnical Exploration Bradley Office Building Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Cosgray: ORIGINAL MAY 2 6 2005 Vl Ill C.v Jam. ... .:-6, y/ ' Phillips Engineering, Inc. is pleased to submit this report of the geotechnical exploration for the above-referenced project. This exploration was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, on May 3, 2005. The purposes of this study were to explore subsurface conditions at the site and to use the data obtained to develop engineering recommendations for site preparation, foundation design, and pond design. SUMMARY In summary, the results of this exploration indicate that the site will support the proposed office building on conventional shallow foundations. • An allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 psf is recommended. • The estimated seasonal high groundwater level appears to be at approximately 2%2 below existing grades across the site. Routine site preparation (including removal of the existing surface vegetation, and proofrolling the site) is recommended to provide adequate support for new foundations and pavements. PROJECT INFORMATION Project information was provided during our telephone conversation and subsequent facsimile on May 3, 2005. The project consists of the construction of a new office building for Bradley Construction Company. The new office will be located at 2119 NE Coachman, in Clearwater, Florida. The vacant lot measures approximately 110 feet by 175 feet. An existing mound, about 3 feet in height, is located on the east- central portion of the site. The one-story building will have a plan area of about 0 2111 Hills Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33.606 P 813.434.5514 F 813.254.4919 E jphi11309tampa bay.rr.com Bradley Office • Clearwater, Florida P.E. Project No. 05-022 0 ORIGINAL 4,200 square feet. A parking lot will be located on the west side of the lot, and a stormwater pond is planned for the south side of the building. It is assumed that maximum column and wall loads will be no more than 80 kips and 3 kips per linear foot, respectively. It is also assumed that no more than 2 feet of fill will be needed to achieve finished grades. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Two Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings were performed within the proposed building area. The SPT borings were drilled to depths of 25 feet each. Two hand auger borings were performed to 5 feet, within the proposed pavement areas and one hand auger, (HA-3) was performed at the top of the existing mound. One auger boring to 15 feet and one double-ring infiltrometer (DRI) test were also performed for the proposed pond. The field testing locations were determined in the field by referencing from existing site features and are shown on the Location Plan in the Appendix. Standard Penetration Tests were performed continuously in the SPT borings between depths of 5 and 10 feet, and at 5-foot intervals thereafter. Each sample was removed from the split-spoon sampler in the field and was examined, packaged and transported to our office for further examination and classification. GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions encountered in the borings are shown on the Boring Logs in the Appendix. Descriptions of the soils encountered in the borings are presented on each log, accompanied by the Unified Soil Classification symbol (SP, SC, etc.) based on visual examination. Stratification boundaries between the soil types should be considered approximate as the actual transition may be gradual. Beneath the ground surface, the borings encountered a few feet of fill, consisting of clean sands of varying mixed colors. Below the surficial fill, the borings encountered relatively clean sands to the boring termination depths. The SPT N-values in the borings ranged from 2 to 26 blows per foot. The hand auger borings encountered clean sands to the termination depths of 5 feet. Boring HA-3, which was performed through the top of the existing mound, encountered clean sandy soils. No detrimental or deleterious fill/debris was encountered in the six borings performed. The--g roundrNate?level.._was -_encountered_in._all._of_.the._borings, txce}Rt_HA 3-,-at. a depth. of about 4.6 to 6.5 feet below existing grade. According to the Pinellas County Soil Survey, the soils at his site belong to the Myakka Series, which are described as having a seasonal high groundwater level of less than 10 inches below grade for 1 to 4 months of the year. Based on the results of this exploration; particularly the. presence of the surficial fill and the soil colors in the upper few feet, the MAY 2 0 2005 2 Bradley Office . Clearwater, Florida ORIGINAL P.E. Project No. 05-022 estimatedseasonal high groundwater level appears to be about 2%2 feet below existing grade for this site. Double-Ring Infiltrometer (DRI) Test Results: One DRI test was performed at the proposed pond location, at a depth of 1.2 feet. After the test duration of 4 hours a stabilized infiltration rate of 12 inches per hour was recorded. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the project information provided, the geotechnical data obtained from the exploration, and experience with similar subsurface conditions and construction types. If the final building locations, grades or foundation loads are significantly different from those previously described, or if different soil conditions are encountered during construction, please notify Phillips Engineering, Inc., so that these recommendations might be reviewed in light of such changes. Foundation Design: The proposed building may be constructed on conventional shallow foundations bearing at minimum depths below finished exterior grades. Individual footings may be designed based on a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot. Minimum footing dimensions of 24 inches should be used even though the maximum allowable bearing pressures may not be fiilly developed in all cases. Footings should bear at least 18 inches below finished exterior grades. Footing subgrade soils should be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to placement of reinforcement and concrete. As a minimum, the footing subgrade soils should be compacted to a density of at least 95% of the soils modified Proctor maximum dry density, (ASTM D-1557), for a depth of 12 inches. Site Preparation: The initial step in routine site preparation should be the removal of all topsoil, surface vegetation, trees, and any major root systems. After the site clearing process, the entire site should be observed by the project, Geotechnical Engineer. At this time, the site should be proofrolled using a large vibratory roller. Proofrolling of the proposed structure areas should consist of at least four overlapping passes in each of two perpendicular directions. The purposes of the proofrolling will be to detect any areas where unsuitable soils or deleterious materials are present as well as to density the near-surface loose soils for support of shallow foundations. Materials which yield excessively during the proofrolling should be undercut and replaced with well-compacted structural fill. Proofrolling of the structure and .pavement-areas-should.-continue.for_the_required.number_of_passes-and untilthe- soil at. a depth of 12 inches below the compaction surface has attained a minimum of 95% of the soil's modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Specification D-1557. In-place density tests should be performed by an experienced geotechnical engineering technician to verify the required degree of compaction. A I V 3 MAY 26 2005 Bradley Office . is ORIGINAL Clearwater, Florida P.E. Project No. 05-022 test frequency of one test per 2,500 square feet of structural area proofrolied and one test per 5,000 square feet of pavement area proofrolled is recommended. Fill Placement: After the site has been proofrolled and accepted by the Geotechnical Engineer, any fill required to bring the site to final grade should be placed and properly compacted. All fill should be inorganic, non-plastic, granular soil (clean sands). The fill should be placed in level lifts not to exceed 12 inches loose thickness. The fill should be compacted to a minimum of 95% of the soil's modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Specification D-1557. In-place density tests should be performed on each lift by an experienced geotechnical engineering technician. The same test frequency is recommended as for the proofrolling operation. All fill placed in utility line trenches and adjacent to footings beneath slabs on grade should be properly placed and compacted to the specification stated above.. However, in these restricted working areas, compaction should be accomplished with lightweight, hand-guided compaction equipment and lift thicknesses should be limited to a maximum of 4 inches loose thickness. Pavement Recommendations: With site preparation completed as recommended, an asphaltic concrete/limerock base pavement may be utilized for the project. The actual pavement design should be based on the anticipated traffic loads and design life. Based on previous experience, the following minimum pavement section is recommended. Section Thickness Asphalt 2 inches Limerock Base 6 inches Stabilized Subbase 12 inches Compaction and Stability (93% Marshall max. density) (98% of max. dry density, and 100 LBR) (95% of max. dry density, and 40 LBR) Stabilization of the existing sandy soils is recommended to prevent rutting during base placement, to obtain the necessary pavement structural value, and to obtain a uniform base thickness. For the concrete pavement and dumpster pad areas, a minimum concrete thickness of 5 inches is recommended. The concrete pavement may be placed directly on the compacted stabilized subbase. SPECIFICATION REVIEW It is recommended that Phillips Engineering, Inc. be allowed to review the foundation --? _-- -. _- -- and--earthwork--plans -anal-.specifications--.prepared-based- -.on- the -recommendations-. presented in this report. This is to confirm that these recommendations are properly interpreted and implemented. MAY 2 6 2005 CV.- ,= Bradley Office • Clearwater, Florida P.E. Project No. 05-022 CLOSURE 0 ORIGINAL j Phillips Engineering, Inc. appreciates this opportunity to assist you with this project. If you have any questions concerning the contents of this report, or if I may be of further assistance, please give me a call. Sincerely, Phillips Engineering, Inc. John C. Phillips, P.E. President/Geotechnical Engineer Florida Registration No. 47586 Appendix: Boring Location Plan 1 Boring Logs Distribution: 2 - Addressee 1 - Mr. Keith Zayac, P.E., RLA / Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. File Name: 05-022 Bradley Office/Report.doc MAY 26 2005 PON, -KIT - .. ?.7 CW CCL 5 C? J ORIGINAL APPENDIX V --I DiD MAY 2 6 2005 PIE, C-9- -Ift IT ?G+\ • • ORIGINAL 0 6 HA- 2 okNoT To 5eAL9- -SSOe> NAAF = f!>CkALLElf aFFtcIF SoC?, No a7S- 022 211 at NE C o A C: 1A AA A w) 1.1A- t I 8 {- Y 1-1A • 3 +AS. t (??ofzoa& L6CA-rl0k3 Pt-AtJ a --Yc.p 5- 13 -03 (Re-?eIre-Acft : al brza-., - -- ---------- MAY 2 2005 x_ _+ ? ..: ij+ it- yK.T E1??GINEEIZING rNG. t .. d J LL LL c 7 LL C cc e • • BORING NUMBER B-1 YNGs OF1 PE NEERINGp OR16TNAL CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NAME Bradley Office PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater. Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5/13/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Mud/Rotary ?-Z AT TIME OF DRILLING 6.5 ft LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- w a z A SPT N VALUE A o ? w 20 40 60 80 a =p _ Of ?z5 0- F= PL MC LL ? ` p MATERIAL DESCRIPTION m -1 2 > O? Q w w z --0 o o-5 of O? mO> ve }? 20 40 60 80 (9 Z U z < a o p FINES CONTENT (%) ? 0 20 40 60 80 Gray and brown mixed fine SAND (SP) Tan fine SAND (SP) Brown fine SAND (SP) 5 3-3-4-5 SS (7) _ Dark brown fine SAND (SP) 1-2-3-3 SS (5) SS 1-1-2-2 (3) 10 15 3-7-13 SS (20) Brown fine SAND (SP) 20 6-7-11 SS (18) 25 8-8-8 Bottom of hole at 25.0 feet. SS (16) J ? I MAY 2 3' 2005 t; A, LL L C Y W I C a cc a 111 • • 1* BORING NUMBER B-2 E JL XXX S R NGINEERINGP 0 ' ` ( GTNOA'L CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NAME Bradley Office PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater. Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5/13/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Mud/Rotary ?-Z AT TIME OF DRILLING 4.8 ft LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- A SPT N VALUE.A U ? x > w w 20 40 60 80 I=- C7 p ATERIAL DESCRIPTION W g m _ w? > CJ 0 z -j D Q a- I-? W w Z L MC LL o (Lz O A m0Z V" }" 20 40 60 80 O Q V w ?- O rr ? FINES CONTENT (%) ? o a a 0 20 40 60 80 Gray and tan fine SAND (SP) Brown fine SAND (SP) 5 ' `. 17 3-3-4-4 SS (7) Dark brown fine SAND (SP) 2-1-2-3 SS (3) SS 1-1-1-2 10 (2) 15 SAND SP B f 3 3 ) rown ine ( SS (20) 20 7-9-11 SS (20) 25 10-12-14 Bottom of hole at 25.0 feet. SS (26) ?r 4y? I d r.d? _ -. _ u C . • BORING NUMBER HA-1 * PAGE 1 OF 1 ?iH A ]..ENGINEERING A- ORIGINAL CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NAME Bradley Office PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5113/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hand Auger ?Z AT TIME OF DRILLING 4.6 ft LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING - NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- w ? SPT N VALUE L U ? W >- u) w 20 40 60 80 m = m w? _ ?z? 0. ~? PL MC LL W c7 a p MATERIAL DESCRIPTION > d 0- O Q co 0 > w Y4 z CL =) " 20 40 60 80 C7 < z W U? a o El FINES CONTENT (%) 0 0 20 40 60 80 Gray fine SAND (SP) Tan fine SAND (SP) 5 .'. SL Bottom of hole at 5.0 feet. i i i MAY 26 2005 , C ' I A s 7 t---- -i U C • • . BORING NUMBE R HA-2 PAGE I ?ll S PPINEERIN!P ORIGINAL CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NAME Bradley Office PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater, Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5/13/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hand Auger ?Z AT TIME OF DRILLING 4.8 ft LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING - NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- - W a o z tt A SPT N VALUE A U - Of W w 5 20 40 60 80 w 00 W p =1 n. PL MC LL O ? p -j MATERIAL DESCRIPTION W 0. > C7 O A ¢ m 0 Z W2 v " z } " '?-0 1 20 40 60 80 Q V Lu O 0 0 FINES CONTENT (%) O r 0 20 40 60 80 Gray fine SAND (SP) Brown fine SAND (SP) Tan fine SAND (SP) 5 Bottom of hole at 5.0 feet. t ) i 1 S 2 MAY 2 6 2005 a w U LL c } 0 a a m • • • BORING NUMBER Ho 3 s ? L JKL i ENGINEERINGp Off PROJECT NAME B l ORIGINAI ice rad ey CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater. Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5/13/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hand Auger AT TIME OF DRILLING - - LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES Groundwater not encountered. AFTER DRILLING -- (L a- - 2? ASPTNVALUE? U W >- N w W 20 40 60 80 _ ~ = O a PL w 0- 0 -? MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _j M a :D > a O ? D? Q co 0 w N Y Z a F- - 1 --I 20 40 60 80 O Z U? W a W ? FINES CONTENT (%) O 0 20 40 60 80 Tan fine SAND (SP) Tan and gray fine SAND (SP) 5 Dark brown fine SAND (SP) Bottom of hole at 5.0 feet. MAY 2 ? 2005 --- . i • • BORING NUMBER AB-1 PAGE 1 OF 1 11 h 1 s 1 PENGINEERINGJR- ORIGINAL CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NAME Bradley Office PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5/13/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Machine Auger ?VAT TIME OF DRILLING 5.8 ft LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING - NOTES AFTER DRILLING ? SPT N VALUE A U W > U w w 20 40 60 80 = = w? ?z? H? ?= PL MC LL r C9 p MATERIAL DESCRIPTION m O § ` 0 W a m o Y 0 80 20 0 U < Z W U Z 0 Ix El FINES CONTENT (%) ? d Q 0 20 40 60 80 Gray fine SAND (SP) Tan fine SAND (SP) Brown fine SAND (SP) 5 Dark brown fine SAND (SP) 10 15 Bottom of hole at 15.0 feet. s s i i 7 I J ° f•Z 2 1 Lu L C iL • ORIGINAL NJEST PL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATION SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER DISTRICT o GI ME?? 9 MANAGEMENT 2379 BROAD STREET BROOKSVILLE, FL 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (800) 423-1476 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ACOE Application # Date Received Proposed Project Latitude Proposed Project Longitude DEP/WMD Application Date Received Fee Received $ Fee Receipt # SECTION A PART 1: Are any of the activities described in this application proposed to occur in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters? ? yes ¢f no Is this application being filed by or on behalf of an entity eligible for a fee reduction? ? yes Idno PART 2: A. Type of Environmental Resource Permit Requested (check at least one) ? Noticed General - include information requested in Section B. ? Standard General (single family dwelling)-include information requested in Sections C and D. ? Standard General (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E. e Standard General (minor systems) - include information requested in Sections C and H. ? Standard General (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I. ? Individual (single family dwelling) - include information requested in Sections C and D. ? Individual (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E. ? Individual (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I. ? Conceptual - include information requested in Sections C and E. ? Mitigation Bank (construction) - include information requested in Section C and F. (If the proposed mitigation bank involves the construction of a surface water management system requiring another permit listed above, check the appropriate box and submit the information requested by the applicable section.) ? Mitigation Bank (conceptual) - include information requested in Section C and F. B. Type of activity for which you are applying (check at least one) 'f$- Construction or operation of a new system, including dredging or filling in.., on or over wetlands and other surface waters. (If reapplying for an expired, denied or withdrawn permit/ application, please provide previous permit ? Alteration or operation of an existing system which was not previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. ? Modification of a system previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. Provide previous permit # and check applicable modification type. ? Alteration of a system ? Extension of permit duration ? Abandonment of a system ? Construction of additional phases of a system ? Removal of a system C. Are you requesting authorization to use State Owned Submerged Lands. o yes ono If yes, include the information requested in Section G. D. For activities in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters, check type of federal dredge and fill permit requested: ? Individual ? Programmatic General ? General ? Nationwide PFNot Applicable E. Are you claiming to qualify for an exemption? Dyes A no If yes, provide rule number if known FORM 547.27/ERP 8:94 APa e 1 of 5 r... uvA?C I DO MAY 2 6 2005 Pi4.c!1iL ING- D ORIGINAL PART 3: A. OWNER(S) OF LAND B. APPLICANT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER) NAME NAME Peter Makris COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE ADDRESS ADDRESS 2110 Drew Street CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP Clearwater, FL 33765 TELEPHONE (727) 409-5930 TELEPHONE ( ) FAX ( ) FAX ( ) C. AGENT AUTHORIZED TO SECURE PERMIT (IF AN AGENT D. CONSULTANT (IF DIFFERENT FROM AGENT) IS USED) NAME NAME Keith E. Zayac, P.E. COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. ADDRESS ADDRESS 701 Enterprise Road East, Ste 404 CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP Safety Harbor, FL 34695 TELEPHONE (727) 793-9888 TELEPHONE ( ) FAX (727) 793-9855 FAX ( ) PART 4: PROJECT INFORMATION A. Name of project, including phase if applicable: Bradley Construction Co Office B. Is this application for part of a multi-phase project? ? yes W no C. Total applicant-owned area contiguous to the project: n 44 acres D. Total project area for which a permit is sought: 0.44 acres E. Total impervious area for which a permit is sought: 0.25 acres F. Total area (metric equivalent for federally funded projects) of work in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters: 0 acres or square feet (-hectares or square meters) G. Total number of new boat slips proposed: n FORM 547.27/ERP(8-94)A Page 2 of 5 '__' .' : . Q d\1&'__' ? PAY 2 a 2005 C- 10 py\kt "z ? ' f ? ?,'?!ITMENT criv (311: u 0 ORIGINAL PART 5: PROJECT LOCATION (use additional sheets, if needed) County(ies) n1", 6,-' Section(s) Township Z Range t Section(s) Township Range Land Grant name, if applicable Tax Parcel Identification Number Street address, road, or other location I f } . 15? ". City, Zip Code, if applicable of -A-t? 1y- PART 6: DESCRIBE IN GENERAL TERMS THE PROPOSED PROJECT, SYSTEM, OR ACTIVITY. 4,200 SF office building with 17 parking spaces served by a normally dry stormwater pond. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 3 of 5 [L-, ??- -_JV/ MAY 2 3 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CL-6711r' T-7-.q ORIGINAL PART 7: A. If there have been any pre-application meetings for the proposed project, with regulatory staff, please list the date(s), location(s), and names of key staff and project representatives. Date(s) Location(s) Names B. Please identify by number any MSSW/WRM (dredge & fill)/ERP/ACOE permits or applications pending, issued or denied and any related enforcement actions at the proposed project site. Aqencv Date Number/ Type - Action Taken C. 1. 2. 3. 4. MAY 2 ; 2005 5. 6. PLAWNWIG DERARTMENT CITY C?- FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 4 of 5 whose property directly adjoins the project (excluding applicant) and/or is located within a 500 foot radius of the project boundary (for proprietary authorizations, if any). Please provide a drawing identifying each owner and adjoining property lines. (Use additional sheets, if needed). C-12 0 0 PART 8: ORIGINAL A. By signing this application form, I am applying, or I am applying on behalf of the owner or applicant, for the permit and/or proprietary authorizations identified above, according to the supporting data and other incidental information filed with this application. I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and represent that such information is true complete and accurate. I understand that knowingly making any false statement or representation in the application is a violation of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. 1 understand this is an application and not a permit and work prior to approval is a violation. I understand that this application and any permit or proprietary authorization issued pursuant thereto, does not relieve me of any obligation for obtaining any other required federal, state, water management district or local permit prior to commencement of construction. I agree, or I agree on behalf of the owner or applicant, to operate and maintain the permitted system unless the permitting agency authorizes transfer of the permit to a responsible operation entity. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Typed/Printed Name of Owner, Applicant or Agent Cor ate Tit/, if a cable Sign re of Owner, Applicant or Agent D to B. AN AGENT MAY SIGN ABOVE ONLY IF THE FOLLOWING IS COMPLETED: I hereby designate and authorize the agent listed above to act on my behalf, or on behalf of my corporation, as the agent in the processing of this application for the permit and/or proprietary authorization indicated above; and to furnish, on request, supplemental information in support of the application. In addition, I authorize the above-listed agent to bind me, or my corporation, to perform any requirement which may be necessary to procure the permit or authorization indicated above. See attached Affidavit /Printed Name of Owner or Applicant Corporate Title, if applicable Signature of Owner or Applicant Date C. PERSON AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: I either own the property described in this application or I have legal authority to allow access to the property, and I consent, after receiving prior notification, to any site visit on the property by agents or personnel from the Department of Environmental Protection, the Southwest Florida Water Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers necessary for the review and inspection of the proposed project specified in this application. I authorize these agents or personnel to enter the property as many times as may be necessary to make such review and inspection. Further, I agree to provide entry to the project site for such agents or personnel to monitor authorized work if a permit is granted. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Name , if applicable y ? /G D. I certify that the engineering features of this surface water management system have been designed by me or under my responsible charge and in my professional opinion conform with sound engineering principles and all applicable rules and specifications. I further agree that I or my engineering firm will furnish the applicant/ permittee .th a set of guidelines and schedules for maintenance and operation of the surface water G m?q?gett system. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 48192 By: Signature of Engineer of Record Name (please type) FL P.E. No. *AFFIX SEAL* Date: 2 e Phone: l 727 t 793-9888 FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Company Name 701 Enterprise Road East, Ste 404 Company Address Safety Harbor, FL 34695 City, State, Zip ?. 7J ?J ..J Page 5 of 5 u1ul?? `i MAY 2 6 2005 C- 13 pk'" IF C L ER FORM 592-12 ROADWAY DESIGN 0 0 ESIGN 10/86 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRASPORTATION DRAINAGE CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION To be completed by DOT Drainage Connection Permit Application No. Received By State Road No. Section No. Milepost To be completed by Applicant Applicant's Name: Peter Makris Date Maintenance Unit Construction Project No. _ Station FROM TO Address: 2110 Drew St. (727) 409-5930 STREET TELEPHONE NO. Clearwater Pinellas FL 33765 CITY COUNTY STATE ZIP Project Name: Bradley Construction Office Location: 2119 NE Coachman Rd. Clearwater STREET SR. NO. US HWY NO. CITY Pinellas 12 29 15 COUNTY SECTION(S) TOWNSHIP(S) RANGE(S) Brief Description of Activity Proposed: 4200 SF office building and 17 parking spaces with normally dry stormwater pond That discharges into the existing NE Coachman ditch. Briefly Describe Why This Activity Requires a Drainage Connection Permit: (Include Where the Stormwater Will Discharge) The system discharges into the S R 590 right of way ditch NOTE: Rule Chapter 14-86.004 specifies the exact data requirements which constitute a complete application. This form must be submitted with all the required items in quadruplicate. These include: l C t Aff it d f O hi Location Ma -_? - . 1 1 ro on i av p or o wners Legal Description Grading Plan U u??r y, y J ''/ ? JJ ? - Statement of Contiguous Interest Soil Borings -:/ Computations Certification Water Table/Percolation Permit Form 592-13 MAY 2 03 2005 _ _ Photographs of Existing Conditions PiJ j' T t f f ?I- I ) FF".i i?d? pp,? Please mark items which have been submitted CW Ci= C? ,? r?". - Li I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THIS APPLICATION IS COMPLETE, ACCURATE, AND INDICATIVE OF THE ACTT TY AND OF THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE/STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ?- FEATURES AND PAT-TtRNS. APPLICANT N) Keith E Zayac P E 701 Enterprise Road East Ste 404 NAME (MAILING ADDRESS) STREET Safety Harbor FL 34695 CITY STATE ZIP A ORIGINAL DATE TELEPHONE If this application is signed by a representative of the applicant, a letter of authorization from the permittee must be attached. 2 0 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 3, 2005 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., R.L.A. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 337,56 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Re: Development Order - FLS2005-05035 / 2119 NE Coachman Road (Bradley Const. Company, Inc.) Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On June 30, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 4,200 square foot office building within the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-1003.17. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria, under the provisions of Section 2- 1003.17. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the site plan is revised to include the location of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening [per Section 3-201(D) (1) and Index #701]; 2. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide FDOT and SWFWMD permits; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC, and be approved by Staff, 4. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 7. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by June 30, 2006) of Development Review Committee approval; and 8. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. I concur with the findings of the DRC and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development. This approval is based upon and must adhere to the application and site plan date stamped received June 7, 2005 and July 29, 2005, respectively. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HoYr f1k,,nFON, COUNCIL:NIEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMENIBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" August 3, 2005 Development Order for FLS2005-05035 (2119 NE Coachman Road) Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of the Flexible Standard Development approval (by June 30, 2006). Further, all required certificates of occupancy must be obtained within one (1) year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at robert.tefftAa Myclearwater.com or at (727) 562-4539. Sincerely, Michael Delk, CP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BTlex Standard (FLS)Unactive or Finished Casesl Coachman NE 2119 (O) - Approved l Coachman NE 1119 Development Order.doc 11 J its 'r . ?x ••.Aj.. ..ATER, ,, l?ritli LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 3, 2005 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., R.L.A. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Re: Development Order - FLS2005-05035 / 2119 NE Coachman .Road (Bradley Const. Company, Inc.) Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On June 30, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 4,200 square foot office building within the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-1003.17. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria, under the provisions of Section 2- 10031. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the site plan is revised to include the location of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening [per Section 3-201(D) (1) and Index #701]; 2. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide FDOT and SWFWMD permits; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC, and be approved by Staff; 4. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 7. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by June 30, 2006) of Development Review Committee approval; and 8. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. I concur with the findings of the DRC and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development. This approval is based upon and must adhere to the application and site plan date stamped received June 7, 2005 and July 29, 2005, respectively. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYC HA:\11LTON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL,JONSON, COUNCILbIEMBER ® CARLEN A. PE'I*ERSFN, COUNCILMEINIBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" August 3, 2005 Development Order for FLS2005-05035 (2119 NE Coachman Road) Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of the Flexible Standard Development approval (by June 30, 2006). Further, all required certificates of occupancy must be obtained within one (1) year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at robert.teffta rriyclearwater.com or at (727) 562-4539. Sincerely, Michael Delk, CP Planning Director S: (Planning Department)C D BIFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslCoachman NE 2119 (O) - Approved (Coachman NE 2119 Development Order. doc -= C ITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3 POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 LONG RANGE PLANNING TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 3, 2005 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., R.L.A. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Re: Development Order - FLS2005-05035 / 2119 NF, Coachman Road (Bradley Const. Company, Inc.) Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On June 30, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 4,200 square foot office building within the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-1003.F. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria, under the provisions of Section 2- 10031. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the site plan is revised to include the location of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening [per Section 3-201(D) (1) and Index #701]; 2. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide FDOT and SWFWMD permits; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC, and be approved by Staff; 4. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 7. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by June 30, 2006) of Development Review Committee approval; and 8. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. I concur with the findings of the DRC and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development. This approval is based upon and must adhere to the application and site plan date stamped received June 7, 2005 and July 29, 2005, respectively. BRL4N J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR , HOPI' HAMILTON, COUNCILDIEMBER BILI. JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" August 3, 2005 0 Development Order for FLS2005-050 5 (2119 NE Coachman Road) Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of the Flexible Standard Development approval (by June 30, 2006). Further, all required certificates of occupancy must be obtained within one (1) year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner Ul at robert.tefft@Myclearwater.com or at (727) 562-4539. Sincerely, ? G% Michael Delk, CP Planning Director S: (Planning Department)CD BIFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished Cases)Coachman NE 2119 (O) - Approve&Coachman NE 2119 Development Order.doc 0 0 DRC Meeting Date: June 30, 2005 Case Number: FLS2005-05035 Agent: Keith E. Zavec Address: 2119 NE Coachman Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAFT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 4,200 square foot, single-story office building in the Commercial zoning district. The request includes a reduction of the front setback from 25' to 15' (to pavement) and a reduction of the rear setback from 20' to 15' (to building) and 10' (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2-1003.F. EXISTING ZONING/ Commercial (C) LAND USE: Commercial General (CG) PROPERTY SIZE: 0.44 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Office ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Low Medium Density Residential / Single-Family Residence LAND USES: South: Commercial / Business Offices, Retail and Services East: Office / Business Offices West: Commercial / Business and Medical Offices CHARACTER OF THE This area of NE Coachman Road is developed with a mixture of commercial IMMEDIATE VICINITY: uses (retail, office, etc.) and single-family residential. ANALYSIS: The 0.44-acre site is located on the south side of NE Coachman Road, approximately 250' northeast of Drew Street. The property is zoned Commercial (C) and is presently vacant. The proposal includes the construction of a 4,200 square foot, single-story office building on the southwestern half of the site and a 17 space, double-loaded parking lot on the northeastern half of the site. The proposed building will meet the required front and side setbacks; however a reduction has been requested to the required rear setback from 20' to 15' (to building). With regard to the parking lot, reductions have been requested to the required front setback (from 25' to 15') and rear setback (from 20' to 10'). The requested setback reductions are acceptable as the proposal is in compliance with the Flexibility Criteria for offices within the Commercial zoning district. The Flexibility Criteria for offices requires that no sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet (6') above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved Comprehensive Sign Program. It is noted that the subject request does not include the location of any freestanding signage. The proposed 4,200 square foot office building is a contemporary interpretation of the Neoclassical architectural style. The building will measure 18'-6" to the mean elevation of the proposed hip roof, which will S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BWlex Standard (FLS)Tending Casesl3 - Up for the Next DRONE Coachman Road 2119WE Coachman Rd 2119 Staff Report-draft.doc be have warm grey architectural shingles. The building facade will consist of a dark red face brick with a dark brown brick stringeourse. The window frames and mullions will be painted tan while the lintels and sills will be painted white. The front doors will be solid Mahogany. With regard to the porch, the fascia and trim, as well as the associated Doric columns will be painted white. The building is proposed to be oriented with the side of the building oriented to face NE Coachman Road (north) and the front of the building facing east. While it is not necessary that the building is reoriented and the parking redesigned so that the front elevation faces NE Coachman Road, the side (north) elevation should be modified so that it has the appearance of being the front of the building. The development complies with floor area ratio and impervious surface ratio standards of the Commercial district. Further, all applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Flexible Development criteria for Offices (Section 2-1003.F) have been met. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstanding code enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR OFFICES (Section 2-1003.F): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required or improved design and appearance; and [XI [ I b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential property. 2. No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet (6 ) above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed [X] [ I for development unless such signage is a part of an approved Comprehensive Sign Program. 3. Off-street parking: The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely use of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than [X] [ otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non parking demand-generating purposes. GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density [X] [ I and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land [X] [ and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or [X] [ working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. [X] [ ] 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. [X] [ 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, [X] [ I acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BOex Standard (FLS)IPending Casesl3 - Up for the Next DRONE Coachman Road 2119WE Coachman Rd 2119 Staff Report-draft.doe SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 30, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Standard Development application for the 4,200 square foot single-story office building. The request, includes a reduction of the front setback from 25' to 15' (to pavement) and a reduction of the rear setback from 20' to 15' (to building) and 10' (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2-10031, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria, under the provisions of Section 2- 1003.17. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: That prior to the issuance of a Development Order the building elevation facing NE Coachman Road (north elevation) is revised to provide the appearance of a "front" elevation rather than a side elevation; That prior to the issuance of a Development Order the applicant must meet City of Clearwater Drainage Criteria (25yr/lhr storm event). SCS methodology with modified curve number will be accepted; That prior to the issuance of a Development Order a signed and sealed drainage report must be resubmitted; -4=- That prior to the issuance of a building permit the drainage covers and grates in drive aisle must shall be revised to meet HS-20 specifications; 5. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the site plan is revised to include the location of all trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening [per Section 3-201(D) (1) and Index #701]; 6. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide FDOT and SWFWMD permits; That prior to the issuance of a building permit the declining 5" 6" Magnolia tree (Loquat) and the declining three foot (3') cluster Jacaranda tree are shown to be removed; and That prior to the issuance of a building permit the site plan shall be revised to depict where solid waste containers (black barrels) will be located for pick up by solid waste vehicles. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlC D MFlex Standard (FLS)Wending CasesU - Up for the Next DRONE Coachman Road 2119WE Coachman Rd 2119 Staff Report-draft. doe 0 a 10:20 am Case Number: FLS2005-05035 -- 2119 NE COACHMAN RD Owner(s): Peter Makris Tre pRAr u 2110 Drew St Clearwater, F133765 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Bradley Construction 2120 Drew St Clearwater, Fl 33765 TELEPHONE: 727-442-3117, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: South side of NE Coachman Road approximately 250' northeast of Drew Street. Atlas Page: 280B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 4,200 square foot office building in the Commercial zoning district. The request includes a reduction of the front setback from 25' to 15' (to pavement) and a reduction of the rear setback from 20' to 15' (to building) and 10' (to pavement). Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Where will solid waste containers (black barrels) be placed for pick up by solid waste vehicles? Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: I . Drainage covers and grates in drive aisle must meet HS-20 specifications. Please respond PRIOR TO D.O. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues Legal: I . No Issues. Land Resources: 1 . Show to be removed the declining 5",6" Magnolia tree (Loquat) and the declining 3' cluster Jacaranda tree. Revise prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 . No Issues. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues Stormwater: 1 . Prior to D.O.: 1. Applicant needs to meet City of Clearwater Drainage Criteria. (25yr/Ihr storm event). SCS methodology with modified curve number will be accepted. 2. Resubmitted drainage report needs to be signed and sealed. Prior to Building Permit: 1. Provide FDOT and SWFWMD permits DRAFT Solid Waste: 1 . No Issues. Traffic Engineering: 1 . No issues. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 13 r Planning: Notes: 1 . The site plan is to include the location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening [per Section 3-201(D) (1) and Index #701]. 2 . The building elevation facing NE Coachman Road (north elevation) should be revised so that it provides the appearance of a "front" elevation rather than a side elevation. Other: No Comments DRAFT Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 14 Jun. 27 2005 02:28PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 Jun.27 02:27PM 01'39 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-EM0-HELP-FAX (435-7329). June 27, 2005 CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: 0 Keith Zayac, (727-793-9855) Robert G. Tefft, Planner II 2119 NE Coachman Road / Bradley Office Bldg. / FLS2005-05035 Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 Comments: Please find attached Draft DRC Comments for the upcoming meeting of June 30, 2005. Please be advised that the above referenced project is scheduled to be heard at approximately 10:20 AM. ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: Robert.Tefft(cDmyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at wvvw.mvclearvvater.com ** f J q„ q Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. FLS2005-05035 Meeting Date: 06-30-005 Location: 2119 NE COACHMAN RD ? Current Use: ? Active Code Enforcement Case ®o) yes: ? Address number (yes) (no vacant la ) ? Landscaping (yes) Coo) ? Overgrown (yes) (rfo ? Debris (yes) Qo ? Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) (0 ? Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor) ( scant land ? Fencing one (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ? Paint (good) (fair) (poor) (garish) V A o Grass Parking (yes) no) ? Residential Parking Violations (yes) Q ? Signage one (ok) (not ok) (billboard) ? Parking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) Ili} ? Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) 4114' ? Outdoor storage (yes) o) Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date: ZZ- eviewed by: Gabe Parra Telephone: 4785 Revised 0 -29-0 ; 02-04-03 . 'Case Number: FLS2005-05035 -- 2119 NE COACHMAN RD Owner(s) Peter Makris Tre 2110 Drew St Clearwater, F133765 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Bradley Construction 2120 Drew St Clearwater, Fl 33765 TELEPHONE: 727-442-3117, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: South side of NE Coachman Road approximately 250' northeast of Drew Street. Atlas Page: 280B - Gabe Parra Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 4,200 square foot office building in the Commercial zoning district. The request includes a reduction of the front setback from 25' to 15' (to pavement) and a reduction of the rear setback from 20' to 15' (to building) Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, Fl 33761 TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner II Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 22 9 0 LL CITY OF CLEARWATER o tr,at?r PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER.COM June 10, 2005 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 2119 NE COACHMAN RD (FLS2005-05035) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 2119 NE COACHMAN RD, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 4,200 square foot office building in the Commercial zoning district. The request includes a reduction of the front setback from 25' to 15' (to pavement) and a reduction of the rear setback from 20' to 15' (to building) and 10' (to pavement). On June 30, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be June 30, 2005. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562-4539 or Robert.Tefft@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on June 30, 2005. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert Tefft Planner II Letter of Notif cation - FLS2005-05035 - 2119 NE COACHMAN RD j ocarl..-ve COACHMAN CONDOMINIUM KERSTEIN, HARVEY L ASSN" KERSTEIN, DANA B 2127 NE COACHMAN RD 911 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2631 LITTLE BLDG CONDO ASSN INC 2123 NE COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2627 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1112 LITTLE, THOMAS C PO BOX 5379 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 5379 AMERICAN MED MGMT INC 2106 DREW ST STE 103 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3290 MC MULLEN, D GUY PROP INC PO BOX 91 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0091 GRINDEY DIVING SERVICES INC 2126 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3214 SANOR, DEBRA K THE 48 WINDWARD ISL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2321 VEREL, JOHN M VEREL, ARLENE V 211 KERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2512 HOLMES, VAUGHAN L HOLMES, KATHLEEN N 218 GRAHAM DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2501 PARDOS, DIAMOND S PARDOS, PAMELA 12305 HICKMAN AVE BROOKSVILLE FL 34601 - 4944 MAKRIS, PETER THE 2110 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231 SANDBERGEN INS INC 2121 NE COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2617 BRADLEY ASSOCIATES 1177 LOUISISANA AVE STE 200 WINTER PARK FL 32789 - BERNRITTER, MARK F BERNRITTER, EDWARD H 301 KERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2514 HEUCHAN, D F JR 2040 NE COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2614 HARRINGTON, MICHAEL HARRINGTON, GEORGIA M 300 GRAHAM DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2503 MONTOYA, ELIO F VICTORIA, CARMEN C 209 GRAHAM DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2502 4 S C;'WS- 0 cd3 S HOSLEY, FREDERICK E SR HOSLEY, CAMILLE H PO BOX 786 CRYSTAL BEACH FL 34681 - 0786 R & J PROPERTIES LLC 2123 NE COACHMAN RD STE B CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2698 NEW FRIENDLY VILLAGE INC 2110 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231 LYLE, NEWTON 2118 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3232 BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION CO 1177 LOUISIANNA AVE STE 200 WINTER PARK FL 32789 - LAGRECA, FRANK LAGRECA, MELODY L 217 KERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2512 CURREY, PHILIP G THE LILLARD, JUDITH L 534 RICHARDS CT CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5443 WADE, RANDY S 304 GRAHAM DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2503 WESTCOAT, LAUREL L 2104 NE COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2615 COMSTOCK, GARY E FELTEN, JULIE R PANDOV, GEORGI D 2108 NE COACHMAN RD 1405 RED OAK DR SOKOLOVA, BORYANA CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2615 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 2118 NE COACHMAN RD 3825 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2615 H-DESPOINTES, JEAN-PAUL KOTSOYIANIS, DEMETRIUS J VALERAS, CHRISTOFOROS H-DESPOINTES, NATACHA KOTSOYIANIS, PETE EST VALERAS, ANGELIKE 2105 MCKINLEY ST 311 GRAHAM DR 307 GRAHAM DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2541 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2504 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2504 MAY, JEFFREY J HARPER, VAN SCOIK AND CO REMPROP INC 301 GRAHAM DR PO BOX 4989 PO BOX 6163 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2504 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4989 CLEARWATER FL 33758.- 6163 JOPA INVESTMENTS LLC 2105 DREW ST # 200 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - REMPROP INC PO BOX 6163 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6163 REMPROP INC PO BOX 6163 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6163 Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Doug Williams P.O. Box 8204 Clearwater, F133758 LL CITY OF CLAARWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° > MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM June 08, 2005 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 RE: FLS2005-05035 -- 2119 NE COACHMAN RD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-05035. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4539 or Robert.Tefft@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert Tefft Planner II Letter of Completeness - FLS2005-05035 - 2119 NE COACHMAN RD 0 Jun. 08 2005 10:30AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 Jun.08 10:28AM 01'22 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). • CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~ 00 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: June 8, 2005 To: Keith Zayac, (727-793-9855) From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner II Re: 2119 NE Coachman Road / Bradley Office Bldg / FLS2005-05035 Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: "Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: Robert.Tef igmvcleartivater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearwater.com ** rRUhl :C_'ity0f!_i_ari...tcr_R1an Dept Fn,,; NO. :727 562 <18t5 Jun. 32 2005 04::37PM F2 LL •t ,vp t.7 ? its nli S:i+ ater CITY nrzirinini Off, CLEAN WATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICE'S BUILDING 100 SOU H-1 MYRTI T,, AVENUE CLEARWA"1 ER, FLCJRTDA 33756 I'El..LPI iONE: (727) 562.4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W WW.MYCLEAR'lvATFR.C,Y?.NI?.) Anie 02, 2005 5itii=ZV-L t a'? Keith Layac W& -7?N S ?j?-? 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 6n?, ?'?i ?'./J? ?.e l V•C• ? , p? R.F: FLS2005-05035 - 2119 NE C:C)ACFTMAN RDA- LertMer afLtcamplete a,`'C?S?16y) 5 Uear.!<eith Ltiyac The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's tiling syateltt. and assigned the case number: FLS2005-05035. :After a preliminary reviews of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is encc?mglete with the following comments: r ? 1. The sitc-p.lati-s is teulclLd_e the location of till solid ru ste containers, recyoling or trash handling areas aottside nteohatiical equlpmc and all required screening [per Section 3-201(D) (1) and Index #701 Z/ The landscape plan shall include the delineation and d:imonsions of all required perimeter landscape /9 buffers. The landscape plan shall include the deli.nca:tiott ttttd dimensions of till parking anza.s including landscaping islands and curbing. The landscape plan shall include the existing trees on-site and immudiately adjacent to the site, by species, sire and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required troo survey). it is noted that V this infonnation uppews to have been provided on the plats; however the information i:a printed too faint to he read. ?r The landscape plan shall include typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and grotmd cover plants... A planting detail was provided.for palms', huwever vo palms are proposed, and no detail was provided for trees whets trues are proposed. ff Building elevation drawings :are .roquircd to depict all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials. The elevations submiltod do not correctly depict the height d.iinens.ims. Please revise to depict height measured from the existing gt•ade (not finished floor) to the midpoint of the peak and eave heights of the main portion of the roof. Sooti.on 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deetned incomplete, I.h.e deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff No liirther development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrocted slid the application i.3 doomed complete. Please resubmit by Noon, June 7, 2005. If you have any quest.iolts, please do not ho5ital.e to t:ontnct me at 562-4539 or R.nlicrt.,'t_'ef e?'1m clenrwnter.com. Sincerely yours, Rohcit'I'efft, Planner TT Le!tit, r u•,?Ln[rl»ah(N1P•><C.Jb • J-1,S7005-05035.21 -2119 'Y I,, C.T)A(.'H.!WjN&0 I (-,•- a .. ..? 1- ,fir' .,...Y .?.?1,? LL CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 Parwn'ar PLANNING DEPARTMENT } CL? MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEAR WATER. C OM June 02, 2005 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE: FLS2005-05035 -- 2119 NE COACHMAN RD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-05035. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. The site plan is to include the location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening [per Section 3-201(D) (1) and Index #701]. 2. The landscape plan shall include the delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers. 3. The landscape plan shall include the delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing. 4. The landscape plan shall include the existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required tree survey). It is noted that this information appears to have been provided on the plan; however the information is printed too faint to be read. 5. The landscape plan shall include typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants... A planting detail was provided for palms; however no palms are proposed, and no detail was provided for trees when trees are proposed. 6. Building elevation drawings are required to depict all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials. The elevations submitted do not correctly depict the height dimensions. Please revise to depict height measured from the existing grade (not finished floor) to the midpoint of the peak and eave heights of the main portion of the roof. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Noon, June 7, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4539 or Robert.Tefft@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yourss? Robert Tefft, Planner H Letter of Incompleteness - FLS2005-05035 -2119 NE COACHMAN RD • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 U LL 0 Clearwater U FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: June 2, 2005 To: Keith Zayac, (727-793-9855) From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner II Re: 2119 NE Coachman Road / Bradley Office Bldg. / FLS2005-05035 Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: "Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: Robert.Teffigmyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.coni ** Jun. 02 2005 04:38PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 Jun.02 04:37PM 01'29 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). ATTACHING TM SILT EENUS 1 rwe..rwa i 7-7-7 2' IYnE 5-1¢ .?ruiLliL fArmtE1E caw.crzo sNnuzm mac HSE Ts sez . Om MN91r 4 w IH+ PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL NTS '!$PXRL COKnETE (nAL-oEVrtI Asvw.T1 .crzn_ swIZE0 R suecn.cc ASrv 0-r53> (tBn urn. ? b7 FDOT R-O-W PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL NTS O Y 0 HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL I 0 70 r.ml owy. re a u.o.q.a .+rt ?.oro.•o a?'re ' 16 " A F.' U - HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL Iy.. ?= r o?u ,f 1 =h?, S V ?l T ^ fi E f.: o t_ w? V V W .. '. O c[ v 1' a ? w V Q Qa e, C `1 tL w L.1 ? z z ? ? ca n. a` a: o F rn V a at a z O ? a E u O .J ? ? C) W W ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY ' 3 OF 6 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 hoe rt2o'rt ?:; Tpsreu raet r0 aex[HV.m I .,. :. •? tMEnrou l.V+oYeGE/Mw w GENERAL NOTES: tsm m.eee a„rt vms zlvmv.n n ,swmsr- rlnle?WOh6E aOEVFLCp0115E otfl?wM.M AmTALRrtu?f, tfpamac P.uA) AffRMA: ?0 aWa HbM tam(fotwo) tmT OO aay wsclmc wm(&sreay xaaoryk fNmnal naeaa®wm?mtr mnrorwcarwo. L=WM: IapvmNOTArtaS.drtA uoatAa®w he?nlwtrATON ?© ?.. rA,S.x„?m,rrEan,NEwx.E+aN .. a t.ss6s .:.n rs ®>i a.a so.aaoaos ?? r. oev.?+z?oc?r?.® ?s: rm, . m.. ,Fm.ss.n .. s. emn GEMaLITaN NOTES: TREE REMOVAL 45' JACARANDA 5' PALM 16 OAK W - TOTAL TREE REMOVAL PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. C) I ? V 4 r ? 1 , :I N CJ C= LYI QR n P snit v • V,, • ' 15+ `et, aaa PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) low ' GRAPHIC SCAfE L b.e-o n GENERAL. LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. Th. Landscape Contractor shall grade planting bods, as requllad, to prowde positive dreinall and pmrnote optimum plaM growth. 2. Al recommended trees and pant materials will be graded as Nursery Grade No. I or better as oulFrred ply Lhe FI dd. Department of Agriwlure and Consumer Services, Division of Plard Industry -Grades and Standards for Nusery Maw. 70% Eaton, ISM -vi M from time to time. 3. All panting shall be doM in-damoe with the Florida Nurserymen's and Growers Aswdalbns approved practices. 4. All pants shag be fertilized with Agdlorm 20.105 toffee es per the msmrfadurers specifications in coNtmotbn w6h We p 5. 5. The panting sob shall be the app-mate propmi- as follows: eo%send and 5D% organic material'ing of native peat, wall-decomposed sawdust, last mod and by soli. it shall provide a good y,abk and fhoroughy raked dlumwflhedegmteaemtan.d,hagaandwaler-Mb'mg capacUy. uanan ate be flee or an aitaneous daMS. mochas mote, siones, weeds, etc. 6. An planting areas ahal recelw a 3- layer of cypress mdh, which is to be wafted-In after installation. 7: The plant matedal emedale Is presented for the mmeNerice of the Landscape ombeclo. In the event of a discrepancy between the pan and the plant key, the pan shall preva0. 6. Plants shell meet size, coMe"" and spacing specifications. Any mafdal not meeting specifications shall be removed and replaced M the contractors exp- 9. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for moamipniirg My both the site and the rid documeMe. Olyzepsncies Wwrill. at fi aoenootgi eNoo `tlreNendsGpe"IbeIO e?het?o ?an?g. ??n for Is" to report 10. The Landsp Contractor shall W reeponsibk for see(Wg all nace®my spp loabf permits and lknnses to pert.- ehe wont ad forth in this pbn set sod the ?edfioauons. If. Plant material shag be bid as spedned mass unavagade. at which time the landscape Arddtecl will be notified by In vdPong of Intended charges. 12. Any and all queslbns concerning the pan set andlor epedfications shall be directed to the Landscape Architect at (727) 7938868 13. There shag be no addelo s, delauons or wbtuullons wit" the written approval of the owner. 14. The Landscape COnbedor Nall guarantee, in writing. plant s.WVability. for a period of hwhe(12) months from final acceptance by the owner. 15. AN dimensions to be fieldcheckad by the Landscape Contractor pier to landscape material hrSaMthon. Disaepencies shall be reloaded Immediately to ins owner. Ts. All-Wials must ice all epedlbd on the lendscepe pfd. If meterian or boor do trot adhere bspedf tlon4 ttney wig be mjeded by the Coy Pmjed Manager wkh proper In 9,tion canted out by Landscape Conlrada al m adddbomil cost. 17. AN pemdls nx 1y oito be provided by the Instaleg Wrrradow unless otherwise specifically stated for the apedf tiara. 18: No wntrador Merdifbatbn signs shall be permitted on the project, except forlhe project Information signs. 19. ExlNing cod shell be removed as necessery to as Wto new plantings. 20. Any exiting areas that arc disturbed during the landscape Installation Ael be moodded will SI. MV.1he -Film am . 21. The Landscape.Conbador Wit ba responsible for the collection, remove, and proper disposal *(any and all floods generated durfrg Na inal,11" n of this P,*a 22. AN areas d5brbed within right of way anal be sodded. IRRIGATION NOTES 1. A lowvdame Irrigation system, Dint prwdes 1O09% eoverage. a1 proposed panungs. VAN be desgned and intalkd by u,e (Dorft ad- z The prowsad Imgation System mud most oraxceed an applicable City code requi-MS. (I.e., Back Flow PreveMlon, Aubmatlo Rain Sh-ff Device, etc...) 3. Imgatbn sCy/stem rout be dad end aocepkd by Lendscepe Ar .1,*g ptlorto mstalfuon of _ . mgalbn rout Vt dy.ode sedlon 112IXi.C to povde 100%covempt. and Include .. W. sersorend firoo, 4. IMgation sebulit drawings, which socuraley end dearly Identify all modifications Hl. wbdiadlons, must be wbngtW prior to limit Inspection and acceptance. 5. The Landscape Contractor must coordbale the placement and power supply for the irrigation min-I Omer with the General Contracor. 6. Tltefo=! , migalion system components win be combed, per each mamtfadmena spaola9a,: Toro-Netafim TechUne Self Cleaning, Preswre-Compamoung Ember Wee NARDIE - Raindial6 Station Outdoor Control If- R' ale - 214APR 1' Electric Valve Andes - 10" Round V.W. Box. PLANT LIST CMrtNV%, taa O+L: t2u..lna ar.1 lerna.a ,ga..EM]vt Gl(1a Hi.1 r>o, rv a.vMwmae+roa,>nac..Lar.,.(?oc. s.m?b.. roe,.,„, a G.. a Nr.J ac oc >. ai wvNawn r.m;..am a..em.scu-:.aoc. i V 1 L ? - jp}jyyy{ 1 r ? Y J ?.r d,!R L f? w c^ ar> W pZO ? ?U Q S -. a cV ?. N ? as, V u z Q q .? a z 0 w ? a w V W ra Q. w C 3 0 w a z J C W ? PU ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY + 6 OF 6 ISSUE DATE: 05.26.05 f HAX F4EIGHt FASCIA 4 RACE TRIM -WHITE ELV. 24'-0' CEM PLASTER - OFF UNITE VAULTED CLG BEYOND TFb156 BEARING APPLIED LMTELIHEAD ELV^•M'_O'_.-.- TRIM-LLyL3E i FMI514 FLOOR f -. 11 I)ll ELV. 0'•0' PRECAST CONC. SILLS - W41TE 81DELKaM6 WATCHED DORIC COLS. 4 GLASS CAPITALSIBASES - PANTED SOLID MAHOGANY - WMITE STAINED 4 VARNISHED DOORS (S'-0' x 3'-0') FRONT (EAST) ELEVATION 5CA.E: VS' , I'-0' MAX HEIGHT ELV. 24'-0' TRUSS BEARING ' ELV. Mme'-0' WINDOW HEAD ELV. e'-0' DECORATIVE BANDING ELV. 2'-B' FNISH FLOOR ELY. 0'-0' DECORATIVE LOUVER (UNITE) UNITE GUTTERS 4 FASCIA/EVE TRIM U41TE GUTTERS 4 FASCIAIEVE TRIM TAN WINDOW FRAMES 4 MILLIONS DARK RED FACE BRICK DARK BROUN ACCENT BRICK DARK RED FACE BRICK MA%. HEIGHT ELV. 24'-0" WIN V.B' D OW - HEAD 0' EL DORIC COLS. 1 CAPITALS/BASES - PANTED WHITE SILL9 -WHITE WAR" GRET ARCHITECTURAL SHNGLES UNITE GUTTERS 4 FASCIA/EVE TRIM APPLIED LMTELA4EAD TRIM - UNITE TAN WINDOW FRAMES 4 MULLIONS DARK RED FACE BRICK DARK BROWN ACCENT BRICK DAR, RED FACE BRICK RIGHT (NORTH) ELEVATION . SCALE: Va. I'-0' WARM GREY ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES WHITE GUTTER5 4 FASCIA/EVE -aJ4 TRIM APPLIED LNTELMEAD TRIM - W.41TE TAN WINDOW FRAMES 4 MULLIONS PAW RED FACE BRICK DARK BROIIN ACCENT BRICK DARK RED FACE BRICK PRECAST CONC. SILLS - W41TE REAR (WEST) ELEVATION SCALE: W - I'•0' FASCIA 4 RACE TRIM - UNITE MAX HEIGHT ELV. 24'-0" 2 UTAR GREY ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES 4r WHITE GUTTERS 4 FASCIA/EVE TRIM ELV. ELV. 14'• -_0" 0• APPLIED LMTELA4EAD TRIM - WHITE BEARING l95 TRUSS ELV. 10'-0' TAN WINDOW FRAMES 4 MULLIONS jb WINDOW HEA DARK RED FACE BRICK t D ELV. 8'-0" DARK BROWN ACCENT BRICK DEGORI TIVE BANDING ELV. 2'-B' DARK RED FACE BRICK FINISH FLOOR PRECAST CONC. DORIC COLS. 1 ELV. 01-0' • SILL9 - UNITE CAPITALS/BASES - PAINTED UNITE LEFT (EAST) ELEVATION SCALE: VB' , I'-0" JUN 07 ORIGINAL 'I L6tf644 amb 1-h4r...-p FL uc Y 26000901 LL". 0 127.796.1700 F 127•iY0.31i1 Inlo®L6tlng19p1.4mm 1 f 111 MmhmN 3hq ib b 4120, n 33778 Ah 14466, ID D U1 7611 z O U' Z;D O= UW U aw QO to ft6ph- 0. L6Dwty, AIA FL Uc A012265, ID3614 ELEVATIONS L05-32 ?2 25/05 rA-201 _1?fra'lot -X t :iah Locate Hell) _.._ Exit c+x(e,? E . Layers Parcel Information Streets W, 17 Parcels r- Future Land Use I- - honing rv- r Pinellas fount Aerial Photo _.... j Re ;1• Map hftmat .Ay Legen- ., Ph= dick on dots around the mark until you did the parcel of interest, kcl rntr anet u , Scale: 1;3,968 Map: 57319,43, 1321875.19 tnaae: 39, 232 ................... .. ;Start, ] ¦ -,_ -erldar - Micros- wdemark Advanka; 44jCitY of Clearwate,.. ] 1 9 Clearwater 2oni, 0C, A1,1 Cle-a nt ater Zoning pia%: ?'•. _. ?-.i3c; 4i-S.>'. 3 M?} t ----------------- fs 1 w r i. « u'; a 2 S3 i'.') 1,^•?, ri«•:.....w..+++++++r+?L'.i.... -... __ .. :..v.•.:.w.v+.?wFwavR?./J - ...... ..•.. ..?.(.g #..___ ., kg y ?.l sib 4p ate d ?:37:g?gq 1 - ? N 1 • ; * Laye - r . \ IuI3fat Qf: ,, re.is r p -arc eh? 41 - --------- ------ &INK c CD ORIGINq owc "COLOR RENDERING 1' 727-399-1300 f? 727-399-5777 ?? stccca)l affcrh,vRClLcom PROJECT: BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION . 1 1414 Seminole Blc.l. Stc 5 I o. Fl, 33771 t 1 \R 1_23(55, II) 16I4 REFERENCE: L05 32 SCALE: PI, Lic AA 20000901 - \I \ s I fL h B DWG NO: REV: DATE: 5/26/05 C 2005 all rights rescnt,l tcp cn i r., . LaffcrtY.\rchitccturc Group v 0 Dark Red Field Brick "Berwick Blend" by Belden Brick or Equivalent Dark Brown Accent Brick "Chocolate Brown" by Belden Brick or Equivalent ORIGINAL Off White Cement Plaster Accent Sherwin Williams #SW 1038 "Architectural Gray" White Accent and Trim Sherwin Wiliams #1004 "Ultra-White" Bradley Construction Office Bldg. North Coachman Road May 25, 2005 ORIGINAL 11 I I I .fUI: 2'9 2005 I U PLAIVNINTM EVc A E„f I I B LEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. OFFICE BUILDING CLEARWATER, FLORIDA I I STORMWATER REPORT July 26, 2005 Prepared By: ]ABradley Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 101 Philippe Parkway, Ste 205 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-99RR REGISTRATION # 55525 r;t July: 26, 2005; Y` Alex C Azan;'P.Ei= A^ INDEX Project Overview .......................................... 1 Calculations ................................................. 2-3 Stage-Area-Storage Spreadsheet ...................... 4 MODRET Analysis .................................... 5-9 Geotechnical Investigation Report REGISTRATION # 55525 July 26, 2005 Alex L. Azan, P.E. 1:\Bradley construction\Calculations\StormwaterReport_July26_2005.doc Project Overview REGISTRATION # 55525 July 26, 2005 Alex L. Azan, P.E. I [ABradley construction\Calculations\StormwaterReport_Ju[y26_2005. doe PROJECT OVERVIEW Description and Location The project is located in Section 12; Township 29S; Range 15E and consists of 0.44 acres along the south right-of-way of Northeast Coachman within the City of Clearwater, Florida. The proposed project consists of one building, parking, and associated normally dry stormwater pond. Existing Conditions ' The existing site is undeveloped except for a single asphalt/shell drive. Currently, there is no stormwater pond or other storm water treatment facility on-site. Storm water runoff from the site sheet flows into the swale along Northeast Coachman Road. Proposed Conditions The proposed project includes one building, sidewalks and paved parking totaling 10,695 ft2 of impervious area. Runoff will be directed to the dry pond located near the west of the proposed building. The normally dry pond will provide treatment and attenuation. ' Upon reaching the treatment elevation of 72.75, stormwater from the pond will flow into FDOT's swale. The pond treatment volume [803 ft3] recovers within 7.0 hrs. Please see enclosed MODRET Analysis. Stormwater Criteria ' Per Ci of Clearwater, treatment volume within the pond is provided for the entire site [803 ft ]. The City's attenuation requirements are for the 25 yr - 1 hr event with only 50% credit for existing impervious areas, i.e. C = 0.21 for existing runoff calculations. ' As stacking of attenuation volume over treatment volume is not required by the City, an additional 984 ft3 is provided for attenuation (attenuation total volume of 1,787 ft). REGISTRATION # 55525 July 26, 2005 Alex L. Azan, P.E. [ABradley construction\Calculations\StormwaterReport_July26_2005.doc Calculations REGISTRATION # 55525 July 26, 2005 Alex L. Azan, P.E. L\Bradley construction\Calculations\StormwaterReport_July26_2005.doc CALCULATIONS 1.) TREATMENT CALCULATIONS for entire parcel area: (0.5 in) (ft/12 in)(19,250 ft2) = 803 cf [pond elev. = 72.751 2.) freeboard provided: 74.0[top of bank]- 73.3 0 [attenuation elev.] = 0.70 ft 3.) MODRET results (see attached MODRET analysis) CONDITION VOLUME INFILTRATED c POND ELEV (ft) TIME hrs) Permit 803 -72,:.,7 5 24 Design 803 -72,..75 7.0 803 cf infiltrated within 24 hrs. (PASS) 4.) USING THE RATIONAL METHOD, ATTENUATION CALCULATIONS ARE SHOWN ON THE NEXT PAGE. REGISTRATION # 55525 July 26, 2005 Alex L. Azan, P.E. IABradley construction\Calculations\StormwaterReport_July26_2005.doe 2 BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION OFFICE STORMWATER CALCULATIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS: Description Area ft2 x C = 7CA pavement 262 0.98 256.8 building 0 0.98 - pond 0 1.00 - open area 18,989 0.20 3,797.8 PROPOSED CONDITIONS: Description Area ft2 x C= pavement 6,495 0.98 6,365.1 building 4,200 0.98 4,116.0 pond 2,715 1.00 2,715.0 open area 5,840 0.20 1,168.0 HISTORIC PEAK DISCHARGE: C prop = 0.21 C prop = 0.75 t = 10 mins A = 0.440 acs i = 8.5 in/hr C = 0.21 Q = CiA = 0.8 cfs 25 YEAR STORM D I P S R REQUIRED STORAGE Rainfall Duration Intensity (in/hr) Peak Run-Off Storm Release (cf) Min Sec FDOT Zone VI Q = CiA (cfs) D x P (cf) D x H (cf) S - R 10 600 8.5 2.80 1,682 473 1,209 15 900 7.3 2.41 2,166 709 1,458 20 1200 6.5 2.14 2,572 945 1,627 30 1800 5.4 1.78 3,205 1,418 1,787 40 2400 4.6 1.52 3,640 1,890 1,750 50 3000 4.0 1.32 3,957 2,363 1,594 60 3600 3.6 1.19 4,274 2,836 1,438 90 5400 2.8 0.92 4,986 4,254 732 h8radley construction\Calculations\25y24hRatMeth.xls 7/26/2005 0 Stag e-Area- to r S age Spreadsheet ' REGISTRATION # 55525 July 26, 2005 Alex L. Azan, P.E. 1 I:\Bradley construction\Calculations\StormwaterReport_July26 2005.doc Stare-Storacge-Perimeter Project Name: Bradley Construction Office Project Number 409-05 Designer: kez Date: 5/25/2005 Comments: (ft2) (ft) (ft) Area @ Top of Bank(TOB): 3,249.7 Elevation: 74.00 Volume: 3,828 Area @ Design High Water(DHW): 2,261.1 Elevation: 73.26 Volume: 1,789 Area @ Design Low Water(DLW): 1,579.8 Elevation: 72.75 Volume: 809 Area @ Bottom/Normal Water Level(BOT/NWL): 577.8 Elevation: 72.00 Volume: 0 STAGE AREA VOLUME STAGE AREA VOLUME TREATMENT (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) VOLUME: 809 ft 3 72.00 577.8 0.0 73.00 1,913.8 1,245.8 72.04 631.3 24.2 73.04 1,967.2 1,323.4 ATTENUATION 72.08 684.7 50.5 73.08 2,020.6 1,403.2 VOLUME: 979 ft3 72.12 738.1 79.0 73.12 2,074.1 1,485.1 72.16 791.6 109.6 73.16 2,127.5 1,569.1 72.20 845.0 142.3 73.20 2,180.9 1,655.3 72.24 898.5 177.2 73.24 2,234.4 1,743.6 72.28 951.9 214.2 73.28 2,287.8 1,834.0 72.32 1,005.3 253.3 73.32 2,341.3 1,926.6 72.36 1,058.8 294.6 73.36 2,394.7 2,021.3 72.40 1,112.2 338.0 73.40 2,448.1 2,118.2 72.44 1,165.6 383.6 73.44 2,501.6 2,217.2 72.48 1,219.1 431.3 73.48 2,555.0 2,318.3 72.52 1,272.5 481.1 73.52 2,608.4 2,421.6 72.56 1,325.9 533.1 73.56 2,661.9 2,527.0 72.60 1,379.4 587.2 73.60 2,715.3 2,634.5 72.64 1,432.8 643.4 73.64 2,768.7 2,744.2 72.68 1,486.3 701.8 73.68 2,822.2 2,856.0 72.72 1,539.7 762.3 73.72 2,875.6 2,970.0 72.76 1,593.1 825.0 73.76 2,929.1 3,086.1 72.80 1,646.6 889.8 73.80 2,982.5 3,204.3 72.84 1,700.0 956.7 73.84 3,035.9 3,324.7 72.88 1,753.4 1,025.8 73.88 3,089.4 3,447.2 72.92 1,806.9 1,097.0 73.92 3,142.8 3,671.8 72.96 1,860.3 1,170.3 73.96 3,196.2 3,698.6 74.00 3,249.7 3,827.5 MODRET Analysis REGISTRATION # 55525 July 26, 2005 Alex L. Azan, P.E. [ABradley construction\Calculations\StonnwaterReport_July26 2005.doc MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PROJECT NAME : Bradley Construction Co. Inc. POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS INCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Design High Water Level Elevation Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/ExifiItration Trench Hydraulic Control Features: Groundwater Control Features d Y/N Distance to Edge of Pond Elevation of Water Level Impervious Barrier - Y/N Elevation of Barrier Bottom 577.80 ft2 809.00 ft3 4.00 67.40 ft 70.00 ft 72.00 ft I 72.00 ft I 72.75 ft 0.11 10.70 ft/d 2.00 24.00 ft/d 0.20 I 1.00 Top Bottom Left Right N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N -TN N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Analysis Date: 7/26/2005 0 MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS PROJECT NAME o Bradley Construction Co. Inc. CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) 00.00-0.00 70.000 0.000 0.00000 0.00 70.000 0.05683 0.04899 1.99 72.425 0.04116 0.00 0.03030 4.74 72.147 0.02488 0.00 0.01946 7.00 72.000 0.01698 0.00 0.01451 10.24 71.835 0.01307 0.00 0.01164 12.99 71.728 0.01069 0.00 0.00974 15.75 71.639 0.00906 0.00 0.00838 18.50 71.562 0.00786 0.00 0.00735 21.25 71.494 0.00695 0.00 0.00655 24.00 71.434 0.00 Maximum Water Elevation: 72.425 feet @ 1.99 hours Recovery @ 6.999 hours * Time increment when there is no runoff Maximum Infiltration Rate: 3.924 ft/day Analysis Date: 7/26/2005 MODRET TIME - RUNOFF INPUT DATA PROJECT NAME: BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION CO. INC, STRESS PERIOD NUMBER INCREMENT OF TIME (hrs) VOLUME OF RUNOFF (ft3) Unsat 0.99 127.12 1 1.00 681.88 2 2.75 0.00 3 2.75 0.00 4 2.75 0.00 5 2.75 0.00 6 2.75 0.00 7 2.75 0.00 8 2.75 0.00 9 2.75 0.00 Analysis Date: 7/26/2005 ?i m w _c a? E 0 INFILTRATION : BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Time (hrs) Total Volume Infiltrated = 809 ft' INFILTRATION : BRADLEY CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. r- 0 Z6 a> W d 72 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Time (hrs) Max Water Elevation = 72.43 ft c Geotechnical Investigation Report 1 1 REGISTRATION # 55525 July 26, 2005 Alex L. Azan, P.E. 1 L\Bradley construction\Calculations\StormwaterReport_July26-2005.doc P? HIP'S Report of Geotechnical Exploration Bradley Office Clearwater, Florida Phillips Engineering Project No. 05-022 Phl*lll*-DS NGINEERINGNC. May 16, 2005 P.E. Project No. 05-022 Mr. Bill Cosgray, President Bradley Construction Company, Inc. 2120 Drew Street Clearwater, Florida 33765 Report of Geotechnical Exploration Bradley Office Building Clearwater, Florida Dear Mr. Cosgray: 2111 Hills Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33606 P 813.434.5514 F 813.254.4919 E jphi1130@tampaboy.rr.com Phillips Engineering, Inc. is pleased to submit this report of the geotechnical exploration for the above-referenced project. This exploration was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, on May 3, 2005. The purposes of this study were to explore subsurface conditions at the site and to use the data obtained to develop engineering recommendations for site preparation, foundation design, and pond design. SUMMARY In summary, the results of this exploration indicate that the site will support the proposed office building on conventional shallow foundations. • An allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 psf is recommended. ' The estimated seasonal high groundwater level appears to be at approximately 2%2 below existing grades across the site. ' Routine site preparation (including removal of the existing surface vegetation, and proofrolling the site) is recommended to provide adequate support for new foundations and pavements. ' PROJECT INFORMATION Project information was provided during our telephone conversation and subsequent facsimile on May 3, 2005. The project consists of the construction of a new office building for Bradley Construction Company. The new office will be located at 2119 NE Coachman, in Clearwater, Florida. The vacant lot measures approximately 110 feet by 175 feet. An existing mound, about 3 feet in height, is located on the east- central portion of the site. The one-story building will have a plan area of about i Bradley Office Clearwater, Florida P.E. Project No. 05-022 ' 4,200 square feet. A parking lot will be located on the west side of the lot, and a stormwater pond is planned for the south side of the building. It is assumed that maximum column and wall loads will be no more than 80 kips and 3 kips per linear foot, respectively. It is also assumed that no more than 2 feet of fill will be needed to achieve finished grades. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Two Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings were performed within the proposed ' building area. The SPT borings were drilled to depths of 25 feet each. Two hand auger borings were performed to 5 feet, within the proposed pavement areas and one hand auger, (HA-3) was performed at the top of the existing mound. One auger boring to 15 feet and one double-ring infiltrometer (DRI) test were also performed for the proposed pond. The field testing locations were determined in the field by referencing from existing site features and are shown on the Location Plan in the Appendix. Standard Penetration Tests were performed continuously in the SPT borings between depths of 5 and 10 feet, and at 5-foot intervals thereafter. Each sample was removed from the split-spoon sampler in the field and was examined, packaged and transported to our office for further examination and classification. GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions encountered in the borings are shown on the Boring Logs in the Appendix. Descriptions of the soils encountered in the borings are presented on ' each log, accompanied by the Unified Soil Classification symbol (SP, SC, etc.) based on visual examination. Stratification boundaries between the soil types should be considered approximate as the actual transition may be gradual. ' Beneath the ground surface, the borings encountered a few feet of fill, consisting of clean sands of varying mixed colors. Below the surficial fill, the borings encountered ' relatively clean sands to the boring termination depths. The SPT N-values in the borings ranged from 2 to 26 blows per foot. The hand auger borings encountered clean sands to the termination depths of 5 feet. Boring HA-3, which was performed ' through the top of the existing mound, encountered clean sandy soils. No detrimental or deleterious fill/debris was encountered in the six borings performed. ' The groundwater level was encountered in all of the borings, except HA-3, at a depth of about 4.6 to 6.5 feet below existing grade. According to the Pinellas County Soil Survey, the soils at his site belong to the Myakka Series, which are described as having a seasonal high groundwater level of less than 10 inches below grade for 1 to 4 months of the year. Based on the results of this exploration; particularly the presence of the surficial fill and the soil colors in the upper few feet, the 2 Bradley Office Clearwater, Florida ' P.E. Project No. 05-022 estimatedseasonal high groundwater level appears to be about 21/2 feet below existing grade for this site. Double-Ring Infiltrometer (DRI) Test Results: One DRI test was performed at the proposed pond location, at a depth of 1.2 feet. After the test duration of 4 hours a stabilized infiltration rate of 12 inches per hour was recorded. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the project information provided, the geotechnical data obtained from the exploration, and experience with similar subsurface conditions and construction types. If the final building locations, grades or foundation loads are significantly different from those previously described, or if different soil conditions are encountered during construction, please notify ' Phillips Engineering, Inc., so that these recommendations might be reviewed in light of such changes. ' Foundation Design: The proposed building may be constructed on conventional shallow foundations bearing at minimum depths below finished exterior grades. Individual footings may be designed based on a maximum allowable bearing pressure ' of 2,500 pounds per square foot. Minimum footing dimensions of 24 inches should be used even though the maximum allowable bearing pressures may not be fully developed in all cases. Footings should bear at least 18 inches below finished ' exterior grades. Footing subgrade soils should be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to placement of reinforcement and concrete. As a minimum, the footing subgrade soils should be compacted to a density of at least 95% of the soils modified Proctor maximum dry density, (ASTM D-1557), for a depth of 12 inches. Site Preparation: The initial step in routine site preparation should be the removal ' of all topsoil, surface vegetation, trees, and any major root systems. After the site clearing process, the entire site should be observed by the project Geotechnical Engineer. At this time, the site should be proofrolled using a large vibratory roller. ' Proofrolling of the proposed structure areas should consist of at least four overlapping passes in each of two perpendicular directions. The purposes of the proofrolling will be to detect any areas where unsuitable soils or deleterious materials are present as ' well as to densify the near-surface loose soils for support of shallow foundations. Materials which yield excessively during the proofrolling should be undercut and replaced with well-compacted structural fill. Proofrolling of the structure and ' pavement areas should continue for the required number of passes and until the soil at a depth of 12 inches below the compaction surface has attained a minimum of 95% of the soil's modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by ASTM ' Specification D-1557. In-place density tests should be performed by an experienced geotechnical engineering technician to verify the required degree of compaction. A 3 Bradley Office Clearwater, Florida ' P.E. Project No. 05-022 test frequency of one test per 2,500 square feet of structural area proofrolled and one test per 5,000 square feet of pavement area proofrolled is recommended. Fill Placement: After the site has been proofrolled and accepted by the Geotechnical Engineer, any fill required to bring the site to final grade should be placed and properly compacted. All fill should be inorganic, non-plastic, granular soil (clean sands). The fill should be placed in level lifts not to exceed 12 inches loose thickness. The fill should be compacted to a minimum of 95% of the soil's modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Specification D-1557. In-place density tests should be performed on each lift by an experienced geotechnical ' engineering technician. The same test frequency is recommended as for the proofrolling operation. All fill placed in utility line trenches and adjacent to footings beneath slabs on grade should be properly placed and compacted to the specification stated above. However, in these restricted working areas, compaction should be accomplished with lightweight, hand-guided compaction equipment and lift thicknesses should be limited to a maximum of 4 inches loose thickness. ' Pavement Recommendations: With site preparation completed as recommended, an asphaltic concrete/limerock base pavement may be utilized for the project. The actual ' pavement design should be based on the anticipated traffic loads and design life. Based on previous experience, the following minimum pavement section is recommended. Section Thickness Compaction and Stability Asphalt 2 inches (93% Marshall max. density) ' Limerock Base 6 inches (98% of max. dry density, and 100 LBR) Stabilized Subbase 12 inches (95% of max. dry density, and 40 LBR) ' Stabilization of the existing sandy soils is recommended to prevent rutting during base placement, to obtain the necessary pavement structural value, and to obtain a uniform base thickness. For the concrete pavement and dumpster pad areas, a minimum concrete thickness of 5 inches is recommended. The concrete pavement may be placed directly on the compacted stabilized subbase. SPECIFICATION REVIEW It is recommended that Phillips Engineering, Inc. be allowed to review the foundation and earthwork plans and specifications prepared based on the recommendations presented in this report. This is to confirm that these recommendations are properly interpreted and implemented. 4 Bradley Office Clearwater, Florida P.E. Project No. 05-022 CLOSURE Phillips Engineering, Inc. appreciates this opportunity to assist you with this project. If you have any questions concerning the contents of this report, or if I may be of further assistance, please give me a call. Sincerely, Phillips Engineering, Inc. TPff-==' V.[(,. of John C. Phillips, P.E. President/Geotechnical Engineer Florida Registration No. 47586 1 Appendix: Boring Location Plan Boring Logs ' Distribution: 2-A ddressee 1 - Mr. Keith Zayac, P.E., RLA / Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. File Name: 05-022 Bradley Office/Report.doc 5 APPENDIX 504 NA,??E = C?fiAALE?t t?FF'tC? Sob rJo = ?S- 022 2ItR NF COAc-RMAPJ o NA- a 0 -HA. 2 + . G { +AS. ? Q?- LOCA-CIO.&3 PI-A^) Toe'; 1-0 SCALE Ps, PE GGINE tlG e • BORING NUMBER B-1 y l? s PAGE 1 OF 1 p p NEERING CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NAME Bradley Office PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5/13/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Mud/Rotary AT TIME OF DRILLING 6.5 ft LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING --- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- ? SPT N VALUE A U rY w w 20 40 60 80 = a? p > p j a W 2 Z Q PLTIL W v -? MATERIAL DESCRIPTION j - _j M0* U " } - 20 40 60 80 a Z < OV W a o ? FINES CONTENT (%) El 0 20 40 60 80 Gray and brown mixed fine SAND (SP) Tan fine SAND (SP) Brown fine SAND (SP) 5 3-3-4-5 SS (7) _ Dark brown fine SAND (SP) 1-2-3-3 SS (5) SS 1-1-2-2 10 (3) 15 3-7-13 SS (20) Brown fine SAND (SP) 20 6-7-11 SS (18) 25 8-8-8 Bottom of hole at 25.0 feet. SS (16) 11 • • BORING NUMBER B-2 I s PAGE 1 OF 1 P p NGINEER14 CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NAME Bradley Office PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5/13/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Mud/Rotary AT TIME OF DRILLING 4.8 ft LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING --- NOTES AFTER DRILLING --- w o A SPT N VALUE A U n r ui w 20 40 60 80 a m wo ?z- ?? PL MC LL " w (L6 p MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -12 a ? > p 0- Oo D Q m O > w w Y " z a 5,9 1---?--I 20 40 60 80 o O Q Z w U Z O W ? FINES CONTENT (%) ? U) 0 d p 0 20 40 60 80 Gray and tan fine SAND (SP) Brown fine SAND (SP) 5 3-3-4-4 _ SS (7) Dark brown fine SAND (SP) 2-1-2-3 SS (3) SS 1-1-1-2 (2) 10 15 3 3 1 Brown fine SAND (SP) SS (2 0 ) 20 7-9-11 SS (20) 25 10-12-14 SS Bottom of hole at 25.0 feet. (26) ' BORING NUMBER HA-1 il? PAGE 1 OF 1 p NGINEERING CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NAME Bradley Office PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5/13/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hand Auger AT TIME OF DRILLING 4.6 ft LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING --- NOTES AFTER DRILLING --- W ? SPT N VALUE ? o w W 20 40 60 80 U = m w? 0z j F-? - PL MC LL a W v c9 CL O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION W g o > d O - O Q m O> L U.4 Y" Z L) I 20 40 60 80 z U z O < W a o El FINES CONTENT (%) ? 0 20 40 60 80 Gray fine SAND (SP) Tan fine SAND (SP) 5 :. SZ Bottom of hole at 5.0 feet. t • • ) BORING NUMBER HA-2 ??111?1 s PAGE 1 OF 1 J? ENGINEERING CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NAME Bradley Office PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5/13/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hand Auger Q AT TIME OF DRILLING 4.8 ft LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING --- NOTES AFTER DRILLING --- w A SPT N VALUE A U W >- cn w w 20 40 60 80 ?. 1:0 r m w;_ ?zZ) IL z PL MC LL 0- I _ p MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ? g > C7 0 Q m 0 Z w U v a v F 20 40 60 80 p Z Q w 0 - p } W ? FINES CONTENT (%) U) a o 0 20 40 60 80 Gray fine SAND (SP) Brown fine SAND (SP) Tan fine SAND (SP) 5 :: SZ Bottom of hole at 5.0 feet. - ------------ 1 • • ' BORING NUMBER HA-3 p1 s PAGE 1 OF 1 p NGINEERING CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NAME Bradley Office PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5/13/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hand Auger AT TIME OF DRILLING --- LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING --- NOTES Groundwater not encountered. AFTER DRILLING --- 0 SPT N VALUE v GO w w 20 40 60 80 =C7 co _ w? 0Z -j 1-? PL MC LL o_ ? a 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a > C7 o Q J w cn " Z Q I O -1 W j > Y - 20 40 60 80 z v? 0 c7 N W o ? FINES CONTENT (%) ? 0 20 40 60 80 Tan fine SAND (SP) Tan and gray fine SAND (SP) 5 Dark brown fine SAND (SP) Bottom of hole at 5.0 feet. r • • BORING NUMBER AB-1 11?ps PAGE 1 OF 1 1 ENGINEERING CLIENT Bradley Construction PROJECT NAME Bradley Office PROJECT NUMBER 05-022 PROJECT LOCATION Clearwater Florida DATE STARTED 5/13/05 COMPLETED 5/13/05 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Swint Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Machine Auger AT TIME OF DRILLING 5.8 ft LOGGED BY SD CHECKED BY JCP AT END OF DRILLING -- NOTES AFTER DRILLING -- z A SPT N VALUE A U a. W rn w W 20 40 60 80 ~ ip p MATERIAL DESCRIPTION W M W C+ O Z Q 0 W N Z CL PL p a. -' a. O? m O Z V" }" 20 40 60 80 O Q z W O W ? FINES CONTENT (%) ? N rr a o 0 20 40 60 80 Gray fine SAND (SP) Tan fine SAND (SP) Brown fine SAND (SP) 5 Dark brown fine SAND (SP) 10 15 Bottom of hole at 15.0 feet. - -------------- F I I y/? i '`NT??, ;irt LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 3, 2005 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., R.L.A. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 CITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 Re: Development Order - FLS2005-05035 / 2119 NE Coachman Road (Bradley Const. Company, Inc.) Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On June 30, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 4,200 square foot office building within the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building) and 10 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-1003.F. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria, under the provisions of Section 2- 1003.F. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the .surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the site plan is revised to include the location of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening [per Section 3-201(D) (1) and Index #701); 2. That prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall provide FDOT and SWFWMD permits; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC, and be approved by Staff; 4. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 7. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by June 30, 2006) of Development Review Committee approval; and 8. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. I concur with the findings of the DRC and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development. This approval is based upon and must adhere to the application and site plan date stamped received June 7, 2005 and July 29, 2005, respectively. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR r. FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOPI' HAYIICCON, COUNCILMENIBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COLNCILMENIBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" ap- - . August 3, 2005 Development Order for FLS2005-05035 (2119 NE Coachman Road) Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of the Flexible Standard Development approval (by June 30, 2006). Further, all required certificates of occupancy must be obtained within one (1) year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at robert.tefft(a,myclearwater.com or at (727) 562-4539. Sincerely, Michael Delk, CP Planning Director S: (Planning Department)C D BIFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished Cases I Coachman NE 2119 (O) - Approved) Coachman NE 2119 Development Order.doc KFITH ZAYAC &A550CIATE5, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND5CAPEARCHITECTURE PLANNING 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E., SUITE 404 SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA 34695 PHONE 727.793.9888 RICHARD MARCF-L FAX: 727.793.9855 EMAIL FUCHARD@KErrHZAYAC.COM WEBADDRFSS:,W\ WICpTHZtaYAC-GO 1;