FLD2005-11114
Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-5624567
Fax: 727-562-4865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZEQ APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUI RED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Residential Infill Project (Revised 03/28/2006)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT
T,
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
727-446-3058 CELL NUMBER:
LBR Holdinqs, III, LLC
N/A
FAX NUMBER:
E MAIL ADDRESS:
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: LBR Office Expansion PROJECT VALUATION: $ 317,000.00
STREETADDRESS 1401 Court Street
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 14-29-15-10854-005-0110 &'Z 14_29-L5_L,( _4_Q j_OOR_C1_
PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0. 6 8 1 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 2 9 6 6 4 s g f t
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: coo n t- 4- = n'k o A 1o rT n l ri o c n r i n# i n n
PROPOSED USE(S):
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Specifically identify the request
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of
parldng spaces, specific use, etc.)
10553si
Page 1 of 8
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
•
•
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
0 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP
(see page )
D.
?
1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
Provide complete responses to the sic (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain ow each criteria is achieved, in detail:
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which
it is located.
The proposed building addition as an exnanGion of th Pxi?iinr-f 'h1i
and therefore does not change compatibility with adjacent propertie
parking lot addition is made compatible by the use of landscaping t
2. Vreproperties eau > ytng trie corner.
The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
The proposed uses will be screened from the adjacent properties wit
landscape buffers and therefore will not interfere with adiacent
properties uses.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The expandtci_parkinyai 1 ahi 1 i ty wi 1 1 rPditce the nPPr3 for nn-Gtr-ee
parking for the existing office building as well as providing parki
for new employees and. customers served by the proposed addition.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The expanding parking area fronts onto South Hillcrest Avenue which
has no traffic congestion. The impact to the area is minimuzed by
not exiting directly onto Court Street.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed parking area provides a landscape buffer between
adjacent properties and the existing commercial use.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
The landscaping of the proposed parking area will minimize visual
add ac-pl7GtJ c• i mnaCtcz Q1 fart Orx i mp.a_Ct_S_wi 1 1 aJ -- O_h mi n i m J zed_hy- t.
pleasant fragrance produced by confederate.-Jasmine in the landscape
ORIGINAL
Page 2 of $ RECEIVED
MAY 12 2006
ing
The
buffer
g
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
•
0
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria)
? Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
The redevelopment of the site could not be done practically with -a
25' front setback from parking, the lot is simply too small.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
The existing value is $109,000.00, the proposed value of the
improved parking is $180;000.00 thus giving the net fair market
value increase of &71,000.00. This increase the ubutting property v
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The use of a parking lot is permitted by the City Of Clearwater.
4. The uses or ma of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
The proposed parking lot will be buffered with landscaping to mit.ig
any uncompatibility with the adjacent properties and provide more v
openness during evenings and nights when the office is closed and t
5. ie rsign ofat 1 o s , vn Fin p 1 fiY vicinity
de f-the propose reside ra in I ro ect creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicin of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
While the proposed facility wil not provide more pervious area, it
create a feeling of more openness since cars parked in the lot are
then 7± feet high while the previous residence was 13 feet high. Th
6. cut r pro pre- .
The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a w hole.
The proposed parking and landscaping will provide visual access to
plant material and sky which was blocked by the bulk or the previou
residence.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will reduce the visual bulk of the previou
residnce, increase the amount of plant material through landscaping
which mitigates perceived impact on the community character.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
Page 3 of8 MAY 12 2006
lue.
.te
sual
Le
rill
.ess
.s will
lore
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
E
•
STORMWATER PLAN S
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
MENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
? If a plan is riot required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
13 At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
3 Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
3 Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
IN All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
to Proposed stonmwater detentiontretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
IN Proposed stomwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
M Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
(I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies;
C TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4' or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing frees;
0 TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and
condition of such trees;
GS LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
Page 4 of 8 MA`( 12 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
•
•
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
_ North arrow;
_ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
_ All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
_ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
_ All required setbacks;
_ All existing and proposed points of access;
_ All required sight triangles; '
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
_ and water lines;
_ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
_ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
(per Section 3-201(D)@ and Index #701);
Location of all landscape material;
_ Location of all onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
12 SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writterdtabular form:
See attached sheet and located on Jk,g & REQUIRED PROPOSED
_ Land area in square feet and acres;
_ Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
_ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
_ Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
_ number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
_ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
_ easement;
_ Building and structure heights;
_ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
12
REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/x X 11);
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
_ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
_ All open space areas;
_ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAY 1'2 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Page 5 of 8
0
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
M LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"):
_ All existing and proposed structures;
_ Names of abutting streets;
_ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
_ Delineation and dimensions of all parldng areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
_ tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
_ schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
_ protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
21 REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'h X 11);
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
5 BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information;
All sides of all buildings;
Dimensioned;
Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations);
Materials;
3 REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 % X 11.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806)
Q1 All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
? Reduced signage proposal (8 %X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
Page 6of8 MAY 12 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARVJATER
0
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) MAY 19- 2006
O Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: PLANNING DEPARTME
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF CIYARWATE
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Sooping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
0 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC
IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED
AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
13 Acknowledgement of fire flow calculationstwater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
- Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
C? Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is riot required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my Swom to and subscribed before me this / 0 day of
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and mov A.D. 20 0 _& to me and/or by
photograph the property described in this application. ;rte who is personally known has
prod deed
as identification.
Notary ublic, ?C l.1 m
Signature of property owner or representative
My commission expires. c1- -/6 -0 q
.........................................•..!
EMILY MATHURIN =
Pa 7 of 8 Commrl D00393077
=1? ?eL3 Expires 2/1612009 =
i" ; Bonded thru (600)132-4264:
„ ; Florida Notary Assn. b1e
3 .....................................i.n..i
•
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
N/A
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a reques t for a: (describe request)
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (hisrtheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner Property Owner
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by thelaws of the State of Florida, on this day of
, personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public Signature
Notary SeaUStamp My Commission Expires:
ORIGINAL.
RECEIVED
MAY 12 2006
Page 8 of 8
PLANNING DEPARTMENI
CITY OF CLEARWATEP
Clearwater
•
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE NU
MAY 121006
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): ORIGINX
DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 03/29/2006)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
727-446-3058
FAX NUMBER: 727-
FAX NUMBER:
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
Landscape is simple but extends beyond code minimum in that Landscape
-wallIg and 1a)LPrPd planhings 'haup been applied along wpst: buffer of,
proposed ?arklot_Also?erimeter _landsca?e around building! s
north facade has been layered to bring out stronger dss-amine
architectural st le.
S:1Planning DepartmenhApplication Formsldevelopment review12006 FomnslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc
Page 1 of 2
jA",
2. LIGHTING: • •
Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the
business is dosed. ORIGNA<
N / A_?._.-.._.......M_. _ ...- ..._ _.._ _. _ .._ .. __ _ .. _ RF[, gip----
PLAY 12 2006 PLANNING ENT
CITY OF CtEARWER
3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
The proposed landscaping will update this site to the latest
plant uses and Landscape Architectural Style
4. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Goes without saving a well landscaped property adds value and appreciation
- t9 any pro-ject, abutting property and the community
5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
M. SIGNATURE:
1, the undersWied, ad ovdedge that all representation made
in this application are trice and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorae City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
S%inature of property owner or representative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this _1 day of
MO-V A.D. 20_ to me and/or by
4;1audla'I le. ;I- v who is persorraY known has
proddwd
as identification.
Notary ubiic,
My cnnmission expires: 02 ? / 6 -O 4
EMILY MATHURtN'
CommM D=93077
Exp M 2/1612009
Bonded rrlN (800}N3'4Mi
i
rm"'
m.,?o Honda NomryAssm the
...... .................................:.....t
IVA
r;G} .j `r•? tit - r J. ;?. i
jt:
w?URT?3T c"__ _'-- -3aAr SAS -?.r r:
144
-711
14
41
r
a
r I -- '
?. ? q n r?.i.?.?•. '"e ?,?- .?. K ?? ? D' .? - N:t ?..? ?. W:,? . dam:
r
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CIS Y OF CLEA.RWATER
•
•
LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
LEWIS-BIRCH- RICARDO
14
V
1 COURT
0
z
Q
(D
2
LOCATION MAP
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAI( 12 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITE( OF CLEA,RWATER
LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
LEWIS-BIRCH-RICARDO
DESCRIPTION (AS FURNISHED:
LOTS 8 THROUGH 11. BLOCK E, MAP OR PLAT
ENTITLED "BREEZE HILL"' AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK
13, PAGE 66 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
E .. ,i 2 2006
•
0
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
C1i f OF CLEE,ARWATER
E
SITE DATA
EXISTING ADDITION TOTAL
SITE = 21,945 Sq.Ft.(0.50 AC.) 7,552 Sq.Ft.(0.17 AC.) 29,498 Sq.Ft.(0.677 Ac.)
EXISTING
BUILDING
FOOTPRINT = 3,323 Sq.Ft. = 0.0 Sq.Ft. = 3,323 Sq.Ft.
TOTAL FLOOR
AREA 7,580 Sq.Ft. = 2,973 Sq.Ft. = 10,553 Sq.Ft.
PAVING = 10,625 Sq.Ft. = 4,752 Sq.Ft. = 15,377 Sq.Ft.
WALKS/CONCRETE 437 Sq.Ft. = 0.0 Sq.Ft. = 437 Sq.Ft.
RETENTION = 953 Sq.Ft. = 1,256 Sq.Ft. = 2,209 Sq.Ft.
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS
BUILDING OPEN SPACE
FOOTPRINT = 3,323 Sq.Ft. = 0.0 Sq.Ft. = 3,323 Sq.Ft.
TOTAL FLOOR
AREA
7,580 Sq.Ft.
= 2.973 Sq.Ft.
= 10,553 Sq.Ft.
PAVING = 10,625 Sq.Ft. = 4,752 Sq.Ft. = 15,377 Sq.Ft.
WALKS/CONCRETE = 437 Sq.Ft. = 50.0. Sq.Ft. = 487 Sq.Ft.
RETENTION = 953 Sq.Ft. = 1,256 Sq.Ft. = 2,209 Sq.Ft.
IMPERMOUS (% = 14,385 Sq.Ft. (65%) = 4,802 Sq.Ft. (637..) = 19,187 Sq.FL (65X6)
OPEN SPACE (%) = 7560 Sq.Ft. (35%) = 2,750 Sq.Ft. (379) = 10,311 Sq.Ft. (35%)
FLOOR AREA RATIO .19 .81 0.35
PARKING:
OFFICE = 3 SPACES
PER 1000 .Ft. GFA
10,553 Sq.Ft
1000 =10.55
10.55 x 3 SPACES
= 31.65 SPACES
STD SPACES 27 9 31
HANDICAPPED 2 0 2
Sq.Ft. / SPACE 340.4 SF/SPACE
LOADING SPACE 0 1 1
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAY 12 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
0 •
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS (attachment)
This project consists of an addition to the second floor office space and additional
parking for the existing office building. The building, proposed addition and existing
parking are located in a general office zone. The proposed parking addition is located
as a permitted use in a low-medium density residential zone. The Property is "triple
frontage" with public streets on three sides. All other sides are classified as "side yards."
Project Variances under the flexible development standards.
Building Setbacks
Code FDS Requested Office Requested LMDR
Front 25 15-35 25 north
27 west
Side 20 10-20 69 east
10 south
Height 30 30-80 <30
Existing Parking Lot
Front 4.32 west
4.17 north
Side 4.81 south
3.38 east
Proposed Parking L ot Addition
Front 25 10-25 10 south
10 west
Side 10 0-5 11 east
General Requirements
Parking spaces
Code
3/1000
(10553/1000)x3 = 31
Proposed
3.1/1000 (30 std, 2 hcpd)
32x1000/10553 = 3.1
Lot area
Lot width
Lot coverage (IAR)
Floor area ratio (FAR)
10000 (3500 FDS)
100 ( 50 FDS)
0.75
0.50
29498
182
0.69
0.35
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAY 12 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
•
SCIENTISTS & ENGINEERS, INC.
INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN - ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
"PROFESSIONAL SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN"
EB8501
DUNEDIN, FLORIDA 34698
Phone: (727) 738-9025 Fax: (727) 738-9505
LEWIS-BIRCH-RICARDO OFFICE EXPANSION
COURT STREET & SOUTH HILLCREST AVENUE
TABULATION OF TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS
EXISTING BUILDING 7,580 SQ. FT.
AVERAGE WEEKDAY
VEHICLE TRIP ENDS
RATE/ 1000 VOLUME
24.6 186
A. M. PEAK HOUR
(1 HR. BETWEEN
7 AND 9 A. M.)
RATE/1000 VOLUME
3.20 24
P.M. PEAK HOUR
(1 HR. BETWEEN
4 AND 6 P. M.)
RATE/1000 VOLUME
3.40 26
BUILDING W/ ADDITION 10, 553 SQ. FT
AVERAGE WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR
VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (1 HR. BETWEEN (1 HR. BETWEEN
RATE/1000 VOLUME RATE/1000 VOLUME RATE/1000 VOLUME
24.6 259 3.20 34 3.40 36
NET INCREASE 2,9 73 SQ. FT.
AVERAGE WEEKDAY A. M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR
VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (1 HR. BETWEEN (1 HR. BETWEEN
7 AND 9 A. M.) 4 AND 6 P.M.), ',
RATE/1000 VOLUME RATE/1000 VOLUME RATE/7 D010`VOLUME
L• Y
24.6 73 3.20 10 3:4Q ...1?0?
PAUL E? 1+A,GLER, P. ~
.,
FPE 201,8-` ?? = _?
'J . e?
DATE "'' ••??..••••• ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAY 12 2006
LANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARV TER
T Rr
O ;Yl _
?'gCEME?^
An Equal
Opportunity
Employer
Heidi B. McCrea
Chair, Hillsborough
Talmadge G. "Jerry" Rice
Vice Chair, Pasco
Patsy C. Symons
Secretary, DeSoto
Judith C. Whitehead
Treasurer, Hernando
Edward W. Chance
Manatee
Jennifer E. Closshey
Hillsborough
Neil Combee
Polk
Thomas G. Dabney
Sarasota
Sallie Parks
Pinellas
Todd Pressman
Pinellas
Maritza Rovira-Forino
Hillsborough
David L. Moore
Executive Director
Gene A. Heath
Assistant Executive Director
William S. Bilenky
General Counsel
S®ut Ast Florida
Water Management District
Bartow Service Office
170 Century Boulevard
Bartow, Florida 33830-7700
(863) 534-1448 or
1-800-492-7862 (FL only)
SUNCOM 572-6200
Lecanto Service Office
Suite 226
3600 West Sovereign Path
Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070
(352) 527-8131
SUNCOM 667-3271
April 27, 2006
Paul E. Hagler, P.E.
Scientists and Engineers, Inc.
1280 Heather Ridge Boulevard
Dunedin, FL 34698
2379 Broad StrIeBrooksville, Florida 34604-6899
(352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only)
SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only)
On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org
Sarasota Service Office
6750 Fruitville Road
Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711
(941) 377-3722 or
1-800.320-3503 (FL only)
SUNCOM 531-6900
Tampa Service Office
7601 Highway 301 North
Tampa, Florida 33637-6759
(813) 985-7481 or
1-800-836-0797 (FL only)
SUNCOM 578-2070
Subject: Status of Permit Application (Completeness)
Project Name: LBR Office Expansion,
Application No.: 46029710.000
County: Pinellas
Sec/Twp/Rge: 14/29S/1 5E
References: Chapters 40D-1.1020, and 28-107.002, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.)
Sections 373.4141 and 120.60, Florida Statutes (F.S.)
Dear Mr. Hagler:
The permit application referenced above is complete with the information received on
N/AApril 6, 2006.
Please note that this letter does not constitute authority to begin construction;
construction is authorized once the permit is issued. District staff are now processing the
completed application, and will act on the application within 90 days.
Please be advised that any construction activities that disturb (includes clearing, grading and
excavation) one (1) acre or more of land (total plan of development) and that may result in a
stormwater discharge to a Water of the State or a municipal separate storm sewer system
may require coverage under a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit, including a
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Information about the NPDES Stormwater program
can be accessed via the FDEP-NPDES Stormwater section's website at:
www.dep.state.fl.us/water/stormwater/npdes/.
If you have questions concerning the District's procedures, or if I may be of assistance, please
contact me at the Tampa Service Office at extension 2015.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL
Arenee F. Teena' Smith RECEIVED
Tampa Regulation Department
MAY 1 `? 2006
AFS:gjn
cc: File of Record 46029710.000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Douglas R. Birch, LBR Holdings III, LLC
CITY OF CLEARVJATFR
• •
BEST FL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE
OAS ???? PERMIT APPLICATION
r? y
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER
ST
CT
RI
MANAGEMENT DI
o:
?4...., .ti. Cq
`VAC ?tvtE?
2379 BROAD STREET • BROOKSVILLE, FL 34604-6899
(352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (800) 423-1476
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
ACOE Application #
Date Received
Proposed Project Latitude
Proposed Project Longitude
DEP/WMD Application #.
Date Received
Fee Received $
Fee Receipt #
SECTION A
PART 1:
Are any of the activities described in this application proposed to occur in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters? ?
yes af no
Is this application being filed by or on behalf of an entity eligible for a fee reduction? ? yes idno
PART 2:
A. Type of Environmental Resource Permit Requested (check at least one)
? Noticed General - include information requested in Section B.
? Standard General (single family dwelling)-include information requested in Sections C and D.
? Standard General (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E.
la Standard General (minor systems) - include information requested in Sections C and H.
? Standard General (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I.
? Individual (single family dwelling) - include information requested in Sections C and D.
? Individual (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E.
? Individual (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I.
? Conceptual - include information requested in Sections C and E.
? Mitigation Bank (construction) - include information requested in Section C and F.
(If the proposed mitigation bank involves the construction of a surface water management system requiring another permit
listed above, check the appropriate box and submit the information requested by the applicable section.)
? Mitigation Bank (conceptuao - include information requested in Section C and F.
B. Type of activity for which you are applying (check at least one)
0 Construction or operation of a new system, including dredging or filling in, on or over wetlands and other surface waters. (If
reapplying for an expired, denied or withdrawn permit/ application, please provide previous permit
? Alteration or operation of an existing system which was not previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP.
? Modification of a system previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. Provide previous permit #
and check applicable modification type.
? Alteration of a system ? Extension of permit duration ? Abandonment of a system
? Construction of additional phases of a system ? Removal of a system
C. Are you requesting authorization to use State Owned Submerged Lands. o yes m no
If yes, Include the information requested in Section G.
D. For activities in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters, check type of federal dredge and fill permit requested:
? Individual ? Programmatic General ? General ? Nationwide O NotApplicable
E. Are you claiming to quality for an exemption? Oyes 0 no
If yes, provide rule number if known
FORM 547.27/ERP(8-94)APage 1 of 5
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
rY t 12 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
C- 9 C; 7Y OF CLEARWATER
0
•
PART 3:
B. APPLICANT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER)
A. OWNER(S) OF LAND
NAME NAME
Douglas R. Birch
COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE
LBR Holdings III, LLC, Managing Member
ADDRESS ADDRESS
1401 Court Street
CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP
Clearwater, Florida 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 446-3058 TELEPHONE ( )
FAX (72!) 441-1499 FAX ( )
C. AGENT AUTHORIZED TO SECURE PERMIT (IF AN AGENT D. CONSULTANT (IF DIFFERENT FROM AGENT)
IS USED)
NAME NAME
Paul E. Hagler, P.E.
COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE
Scientists and Engineers, Inc.
ADDRESS ADDRESS
1280 Heather Ridge Boulevard
CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP
Dunedin, Florida 34698
TELEPHONE ( ) TELEPHONE (727) 738-9025
FAX ( ) FAX (7v) 738-9505
PART 4: PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Name of project, including phase if applicable: LBR Office Expansion
8. Is this application for part of a multi-phase project? 0 yes of no
C. Total applicant-owned area contiguous to the project: n 677 acres
D. Total project area for which a permit is sought: 0.677 acres
E. Total impervious area for which a permit is sought: 0.46 acres
F. Total area (metric equivalent for federally funded projects) of work in, on, or over wetlands or
other surface waters: 0 acres or 0 square feet (hectares or 0 square meters)
G. Total number of new boat slips proposed: n
FORM 547.271ERP(8-94)A Page 2 of 5
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
41A( 19- 2006
C- 10
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
0 •
PART 5: PROJECT LOCATION (use additional sheets, if needed)
County(ies) Ninelias
Section(s) 14 Township 29 Range 15
Section(s) Township Range
Land Grant name, if applicable
Tax Parcel Identification Number 14-29-15-10 854-005-011 U
Street address, road, or other location 1401 Court Street
City, Zip Code, if applicable Clearwater, 33756
PART 6: DESCRIBE IN GENERAL TERMS THE PROPOSED PROJECT, SYSTEM, OR
ACTIVITY.
Construct a surface water management system to serve a parking lot addition for a 0.677 acres commercial site.
FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 3 of 5
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MW 12 2006
C- 11 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Cf f OF CLEARWATER
• s
PART 7:
A. If there have been any pre-application meetings for the proposed project, with regulatory staff,
please list the date(s), location(s), and names of key staff and project representatives.
Date(s) Location(s) Names
n/a
B. Please identify by number any MSSW/WRM (dredge & fill)/ERP/ACOE permits or
applications pending, issued or denied and any related enforcement actions at the
proposed project site.
Aqencv Date Number / Tvpe Action Taken
n/a
C. Note: The following information is required for projects proposed to occur in on or over
wetlands that need a federal dredge and fill permit and/or authorization to use state owned
submerged lands. Please provide the names, addresses and zip codes o property owners
whose property directly adjoins the project (excluding applicant) and/or is located within a 500
foot radius of the project boundary (for proprietary authorizations, if any). Please provide a
drawing identifying each owner and adjoining property lines. (Use additional sheets, if
needed).
1. nla 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 4 of 5
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
iAt 12 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
C° Iz CITY OF CLEARWATER
0
E
PART 8:
A. By signing this application form, I am applying, or I am applying on behalf of the owner or applicant, for the permit
and/or proprietary authorizations identified above, according to the supporting data and other incidental
information filed with this application. I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and
represent that such information is true complete and accurate. I understand that knowingly making any false
statement or representation in the application is a violation of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. 1
understand this is an application and not a permit and work prior to approval is a violation. I understand that this
application and any permit or proprietary authorization issued pursuant thereto, does not relieve me of any
obligation for obtaining any other required federal, state, water management district or local permit prior to
commencement of construction. I agree, or 1 agree on behalf of the owner or applicant, to operate and maintain
the permitted system unless the permitting agency authorizes transfer of the permit to a responsible operation
entity.
Douglas R. Birch, LBR Holdings III, LLC Managing Member
yypedfRri o wn App c Agent Corporate Title, if applicable
4 _3
Signature of Owner, Applicant or Agent Date
B. AN AGENT MAY SIGN ABOVE ONLY IF THE FOLLOWING IS COMPLETED:
I hereby designate and authorize the agent listed above to act on my behalf, or on behalf of my corporation, as the
agent in the processing of this application for the permit and/or proprietary authorization indicated above-, and to
furnish, on request, supplemental information in support of the application. In addition, I authorize the above-listed
agent to bind me, or my corporation, to perform any requirement which may be necessary to procure the permit or
authorization indicated above.
/Printed Name of Owner or Applicant Corporate Title, if applicable
Signature of Owner or Applicant pate
C. PERSON AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY MUST COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING:
I either own the property described in this application or I have legal authority to allow access to the property, and I
consent, after receiving prior notification, to any site visit on the property by agents or personnel from the Department
of Environmental Protection, the Southwest Florida Water Management District and the U.S.. Army Corps of Engineers
necessary for the review and inspection of the proposed project specified in this application. I authorize these agents or
personnel to enter the property as many times as may be necessary to make such review and inspection. Further, I agree
to provide entry to the project site for such agents or personnel to monitor authorized work if a permit is granted.
Douglas R. Birch, LBR Holdings III, LLC Managing Member
Corporate
Signature Date
I certify that the engineering features of this surface water management system have been designed by me or
D
.
under my responsible charge and in my professional opinion conform with sound engineering principles and all
applicable rules and specifications. I further agree that I or my engineering firm will furnish the applicant/
permitt th a set of guidelines a nd schedules for maintenance and operation of the surface water
€11 h4ge t
, jF Paul E. Hagler, P.E. 20158
By: iA
nawre,ofAigi&Ar Record .
Name (please type) FL P.E. No.
Scientists and Engineers, Inc.
Company Name
tJ >
_f l`L 1280 Heather Ridge Boulevard
Da1ka
!
t
Company Address
(p
73 .
Dunedin, Florida 34698
Pao .e? ` ;27
City, State, Zip
FORM 5AT,271E'FP(8194)Rr? Page 5 of 5
f C- 13
• •
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE
PERMIT APPLICATION
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
2379 BROAD STREET • BROOKSVILLE, FL 34604.6899
(352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (800) 423.1476
SECTION C
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF APPLICATION
This information is required in addition to that required in other sections of the application. Please submit
five copies of this notice of receipt of application and all attachments. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL INFORMATION
ON 8 1/2" BY 11" PAPER.
Project Name' LBRO(ficeExpansion
County: Pinellas
Owner' LBR Holding III, LLC
Applicant' Douglas R. Birch, Managing Member
Applicant Address' 1401 Court Street, Clearwater, Florida 33756
1. Indicate the project boundaries on a USGS quadrangle map, reduced or enlarged as necessary to
legibly show the entire project. If not shown on the quadrangle map, provide a location map, that
shows a north arrow, a graphic scale, Section(s), Township(s), and Range(s), and detail sufficient to
allow a person unfamiliar with the site to find it.
2. Provide the names of all wetland or other surface waters that would be dredged, filled,
impounded, diverted, drained or would receive discharge (either directly or indirectly), or would
otherwise be impacted by the proposed activity, and specify if they are in an Outstanding Florida
Water or..Aquatic.Preserve:
3. Attach a depiction (plan and section views), which clearly shows the works or other facilities
proposed to be constructed. The depiction must use a scale sufficient to show the location and
type of works.
4. Briefly describe the proposed project (such as "construct a deck with boat shelter", "replace two
existing culverts", "construct surface water management system to serve 150 acre residential
development"):
5. Specify the acreage of wetlands or other surface waters, if any, that are proposed to be disturbed,
filled, excavated, or otherwise impacted by the proposed activity:
6. Provide a brief statement describing any proposed mitigation for impacts to wetlands and other
surface waters:
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Application Name:
Application Number:
Office where the application can be inspected:
NOTE TO NOTICE RECIPIENT: The information in this notice has been submitted by the applicant and has not been verified by the
Southwest Florida Water management District. It may be subject to change prior to final agency action.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)C Pat 1 of 1 12 2036
- 17
PL ,NINIING DEPARTMENT
C'-;! OF CLEARWATER
! •
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE
PERMIT APPLICATION
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
2379 BROAD STREET • BROOKSVILLE, FL 34604-6899
(352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (800) 423-1476
SECTION H
INFORMATION FOR GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMITS FOR MINOR
SURFACE WATER SYSTEMS
To obtain a General Permit for a Minor Surface Water Management System, the project must meet all of the
requirements of Section A, Part 1 OR one of the requirements of Section A, Part 2 and both of the
requirements of Section A, Part 3. Indicate which thresholds apply to your project and submit the information
requested in Section B.
A. Project Thresholds
Part 1,
J The total land area does not equal or exceed 10 acres;
77The area of impervious surface will not equal or exceed two acres;
7 Any activities to be conducted in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters will consist of less than
100 square feet of dredging or filling;
The activities will not utilize pumps for stormwater management;
The activities will not utilize storm drainage facilities larger than one 24 inch diameter pipe or its
hydraulic equivalent;
Discharges from the site will meet State water quality standards, and the surface water management
system will meet the applicable technical criteria for stormwater management in the Basis of Review;
-U/, The proposed building floors will be above the 100-year flood elevations;
The surface water management system can be effectively operated and maintained, and;
The proposed activities will not cause significant adverse impacts to occur individually or
cumulatively.
Part 2.
- 4OD-4.051(3) - NORMAL AND NECESSARY FARMING AND FORESTRY
Part 3.
Discharges from the site will meet State water quality standards, and the surface water
management system will meet the applicable technical criteria for stormwater management in the
Basis of Review described in Rule 40D-4.091(1), and
_ The Surface Water Management System can be effectively operated and maintained.
Form 547.27/ ERP (2/05) H Page 1 of 2
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
C-39 1,,481 19 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CfIY OF CL[p,1Z-!A1ER
B. Technical and Legal Information
1. Provide a copy of the boundary survey and/or a legal description and acreage of the total land area of
contiguous property owned or controlled by the applicant, including the project site.
2. Provide recent aerials, legible for photo interpretation with a scale of 1" = 400' or more detailed, with
total land, project area and any on-site wetlands delineated.
3. Provide a detailed topographic map (with contours) of the site and adjacent hydrologically related area.
The location and description of bench marks (minimum of one per major water control structure) should
be included.
4. Describe the location, size (in acres) and type of any on-site wetlands or other surface waters.
5. Provide the project site development plan and acreage of the total area of impervious surface.
6. Provide the Surface Water Management System design plans, calculations and reports signed and sealed
by a Florida Registered Professional Engineer, as required by law.
7. Provide construction drawings signed and sealed by the design engineer showing the location and
details of the Surface Water Management System including but not limited to any preserved wetlands,
lakes, culverts, pipes, under drains, exfiltration trenches, discharge structures, pumps and related
facilities such as paving, grading and erosion or sediment control measures to be employed.
a. Indicate type of water quality treatment system used:
Man-made wet detention off-line retention (Dry pond)
On-line effluent filtration (side bank or under _ Off-line underground exfiltration system
drain filters)
On-line retention (Dry pond) Wet detention utilizing natural wetlands
Other (explain)
9. If a Water Use Permit has been issued for the project, state the permit number.
10. Indicate how any existing wells located within the project site will be utilized or abandoned.
11. Provide a letter or other current evidence of potential acceptance by the operation and maintenance
entity, if the entity is to be a public body such as a city or drainage district. If the entity is a
homeowners or other association, final draft documents verifying either the present or imminent
existence of such an organization and its ability to accept operation and maintenance responsibility are
required.
Form 547.27/ ERP (2/05) H
Page 2 of 2
ORIGINAL
C-40 RECEIVED
[-'X 12 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CI ,y OF CLEPY.'.'ATER
0
U
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS
FOR
LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
1401 COURT STREET
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
OWNER
LEWIS-BIRCH -RICARD0
1401 COURT STREET
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAY 12 2035
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEAlZkf.'AT
BY
SCIENTISTS & ENGINEERS, INC.
INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN - ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
"PROFESSIONAL SITE PLANNING & DESIGN" °rr?ire'+rrrir„x, "
EB 8501
1280 HEATHER RIDGE BOULEVARD
DUNEDIN, FLORIDA 34698 r' e j r t2 Uj 4 %1+
Phone: (727) 738-9025 Fax: (727) 738-9505 _j
7sw Q
L L-HA%?R-l•4Ov
'.P. E. 201.'.58 rR
LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER - SIGNATURE PAGE 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
DRAINAGE NARRATIVE 3
TIME OF CONCENTRATION 4
COEFFICIENT CALCULATION 5
HISTORIC "Q" 6
25 YEAR - 1 HOUR STORM (CLEARWATER) 7
25 YEAR - 24 HOUR STORM 8
STAGE STORAGE 9
EXFILTRATION TRENCH CALCULATION 10
EXFILTRATION TRENCH RECOVERY TIME 11
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
I-SAI 12 2036
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CI-r? OF CLEPpVIATER
• •
PAUL E. HAGLER, P. E., CONSULTING ENGINEER
Consulting for Infrastructure and the Environment
"Professional Site Engineering and Building Design
1280 HEATHER RIDGE BOULEVARD FPE 20158 VOICE: (727) 738-9025
DUNEDIN, FLORIDA 34698-5620 E-MAIL: pehaglerntampabay.rr.com FAX: (727) 738-9505
October 04, 2005
LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
DRAINAGE NARRATIVE
The project consists of a second story addition to an existing office building and
provision of additional parking.
The new impervious surface (parking expansion) replaces an existing residence,
outbuildings, driveway and walks. The existing impervious surface is 2253
square feet. The proposed new impervious surface is 4215 square feet. .
2. Stormwater from the site of the expanded parking now is discharged into the
street and finds its way along the gutter to the City drainage system.
3. New stormwater retention is provided by an underground storage and exfiltration
system. The system is sized to provide 601 cubic feet (cf) of storage with 1'+
freeboard to meet the City of Clearwater minimum storage requirement. This
requirement is based on the increase in runoff from a 25 yr 1 hr storm with the
existing impervious calculated at Y2 actual. In meeting the City's code the total
capacity of the vault is 1176 cf. This large amount of excess capacity allowed us
to design the for the 25 yr 24 hr storm with 0 discharge other than percolation
from the storage vault. The total volume requirement from both treatment and
equalization is 915 cf. This volume is obtained with 2.5" freeboard. Note that all
freeboard is measured from the inside top surface of the storage vault. Rainfall in
excess of the vault capacity will flow out the parking lot driveway to the adjacent street.
The driveway elevation is less than the other edges of the parking area and lower than
any adjacent property lines.
4. The recovery time for the proposed exfiltration & storage vault is 7.4 hours.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MM 1212036
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEP`PWATER
•
T = 0.93
Scientists and Engineers, Inc.
PROJECT : LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
OVERLAND FLOW
(KINEMATIC WAVE EQUATION)
BASIN
WHERE :
L^0.6 x N^0.6
I^0.4 X S^0.3
•
DATE : 23-Mar-06
T = Overland flow travel time, in minutes
L = Overland flow length, in feet
N = Surface roughness coefficient for overland flow
I = Rainfall intensity, in inches/hour, corresponding
to the design storm frequency
S = Average slope of the overland flow path, in ft/ft
LAND USE N-VALUE
Pavement 0.015
Bare Soil (Average Roughness) 0.05
Poor Grass Cover 0.2
Average Grass Cover or Lawns 0.4
Dense Grass Cover or Woodlands 0.6
Forest with Thick Humus/Litter 0.8
Layer and Dense Undergrowth
SOLVING FOR "T:
Year Storm i-----5----- r-----10------ ----25 ----: ----50 ----'----100----
"L" (feet) _ - - - - - - - - - - « --
136.00E ------------ I -- -
136.00: - - - - - - - -I- -
136.00 -"- - - - - - - - ~ - -
136.00 - - - - - - - - - J
136.00"
"N" (table _ - ..
0.400: .- _
0.400! _ _
0.400 ; 0.
4
0
;
0 0.400
"I" (in/hr) _ ---------------
6.80 ---------------
7.40 ----------
8.50 _
.
_
.
` _ -
-----
9.00:
- - - - - - - -
9.50
-
-
"S" (ft/ft)
------0.024r -
--------------
---- ----.024--;---
0
--------------
---0.024--
- ---- --
- --0.024, --
----------------
---------,
0.024
--------- I
"T" (MINUTES) =ii 1 14.49 14.01 13.261 12.96 _12.68
AVERAGE "T" (MINUTES) 13
NOTE : IF LESS THAN 10 MIN. - USE 10 MIN.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAY 1 `? 2036
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Cliff OF CLEAR\'.`ATER
COEFFICIENT CALCULATIONS
FOR
LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
BASIN 1
BASIN AREA = r 7,560 S.F. = 0.17
PRE-DEVELOPED:
ASPHALT/CONCRETE r 4-25-.0-0-', S.F. x 0.95 x 1/2 =
BUILDINGS 1,800.00 , S.F. x 0.95 x 1/2 =
PONDS (D.L.W.)
O.OOS.F.x1.Ox1/2=
`___--_-
WETLAND (SHWT) ` 0.00 ; S.F. x 1.0 x 1/2 =
OPEN SPACE 5.335.00 S. F. + (1/2 Inperv) x .2 =
TOTALS 7,560.00 S.F.
"c" = 0.31
POST-DEVELOPED:
ASPHALT/CONCRETE 4,215.00; S.F. x 0.95 =
BUILDINGS r 0.00 , S.F. x 0.95 =
PONDS (D.L.W.) ` o-.661 S.F. x 1.00 =
WETLAND (SHWT) `
0.00 S.F. x
-----------
1.00
OPEN SPACE 3.345.00 S.F. x 0.20 =
TOTALS 7,560.00 S.F.
"c,. = 0.62
23-Mar-06
ACRES
201.88
855.00
0.00
0.00
1.289.50
2,346.38
4,004.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
669.00
4,673.25
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
2036
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLE.t%'Rv!ATER
HISTORIC "Q" CALCULATIONS
PROJECT = LBR OFFICE EXPANSION DATE: 03/23/06
SITE AREA =r - _ _ _ _ _ _7,560, S.F.
IMPERVIOUS = _ _ - _ - - - 2,225 J S.F. ('1/2 used in calculations)
PERVIOUS = 5,335 S.F. ('plus 112 of impervious)
"C" = 0.31
T.O.C. =
L - _ - - _ ._ 130
_. _. _ - _ - J Minutes
STORM "C" "A" 11Q11
FREQUENCY (ACRES) (C.F.S.)
2-YEAR
0.31 -------------
r 5.40
0.17
0.29
5-YEAR 0.31 6.20
L ------------ 0.17 0.33
10-YEAR 0.31 r 6.80
L - ---------- - 0.17 0.37
25-YEAR 0.31 7.70 0.17 0.41
50-YEAR 0.31 8.40
L _ _ ----------- 0.17 0.45
1 00-YEAR 0.31
r ---8.90----
------------
0.17
0.48
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAY i `? 2036
PLANNING DEPP RTMENT
CITY OF CLFP,R'''A':-R
• •
27-Mar-06
25 YEAR - 1 HOUR STORM
FOR
LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
SITE _
7,560.0 1 S.F.
0.1736 AC.
PRE-DEVELOPED :
IMPERVIOUS =
PERVIOUS =
"C" VALUE _
2,225.0 S.F.
5,335.0 S.F.
0.31
0.0255 AC. 1/2 used
0.1480 AC. + 1/2 imp
POST-DEVELOPED :
IMPERVIOUS = 4,215.0 S.F.
PERVIOUS - 3,345.0 S.F.
POND = 0 S.F.
"C" VALUE = 0.62
WEIGHTED "C" = 0.31
RAINFALL = r 3.1! IN.
REQUIRED STORAGE _
0.0968 AC.
0.0768 AC.
0.0000 AC
(POST-PRE)
601.1 C.F.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
JAS'( i 212036
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CIS( OF CLEF.RVI'ATER
i
SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS, INC.
1280 Heather Ridge Boulevard, Dunedin, Florida 23698
25 YEAR - 24 HOUR
JOB NAME LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
DATE 27-Mar-06
JOB # 05013
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
E 1212 0 3 6
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CIT'f OF CLEARWATER
xx**#x#*#x****f *xxx*xxxxx**#*## ####x#i-*#xxxxxf ***#**#####xxxf ***xx****:H'xxxf xx***##x##xx* **#*##x####*x
*1rx#x***''*'**'" WATERSHED DATA *xxxxxxxxxxxx
**x*##*####x*#f *## *xi-R#irX*it**#'k **#*#*#aF**#xt*f *****!*####*##Y ##x*#1t1r###'Mthk#f x#*x#*k#i•###x ****#*#1t#####
x#xxxxxxxx#**#f COEFF.(C) - ? 0.62 *x#xxxxxxxx*x
#*************' AREA (AC) = 0.17 7,560 S.F. *********#**#
#'"'*'*********" "CA" 0.11 xxx*xi r*#xx# r
*"*** ***x*xxf Q (HIST.) 0.00 (C.F.S.) *************
#*####xxxxxxxxf 1/2" (VOL) 315 (C.F.) ***##x#xxxxxx
*#xxx#xx######f
PERC RATE
8.0
(IN/HR) xxxxx**#x**x*
**************' POND BOTTOM 1364 (SQ-FT) **********x"*
#x#x#xxxxxxxxxf
*#x*xxkx**xi-*xf xxi
1M-*a-A-kxxx#### #x*M##x####x#f
x#Fix*•*x***x*#f
xx#xx#xi-*xxxxxf
x*xx#*xi*xi-J. *x*xxx*xf.###x
x xx***i*xm#:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
T.O.C. RAINFALL TIME ACC.RAIN. INFLOW OUTFLOW OUTFLOW OUTFLOW DIFFE RENCE
(MIN.) (IN/HR) (HOURS) (INCHES) (AC./FT.) (PERC)
-
- - ---
-- (PIPE)
------- - ----- (TOTAL)
- ----- - - - ----- - (AC./FT.)
----- - ------- (CU/FT)
--- - ---------
-- - --- - -- -
1 -- -- - --- - -------- ---
13.17 - - - - ----- - --
0.02 - -----------------
0.22 ----------- - ----
0.002 -
---
--
0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0016 68
2 12.01 0.03 0.40 0.004 0.00 0.000 0.001 0.0030 129
3 11.00 0.05 0.55 0.005 0.00 0.000 0.001 0.0039 169
4 10.19 0.07 0.68 0.006 0.00 0.000 0.001 0.0046 202
5 9.60 0.08 0.80 0.007 0.00 0.000 0.002 0.0055 240
6 9.20 0.10 0.92 0.008 0.00 0.000 0.002 0.0062 268
7 8.91 0.12 1.04 0.009 0.00 0.000 0.003 0.0068 297
8 8.80 0.13 1.17 0.010 0.00 0.000 0.003 0.0078 339
9 8.60 0.15 1.29 0.012 0.00 0.000 0.003 0.0084 367
10 8.40 0.17 1.40 0.013 0.00 0.000 0.004 0.0090 392
11 8.20 0.18 1.50 0.013 0.00 0.000 0.004 0.0097 422
12 8.00 0.20 1.60 0.014 0.00 0.000 0.004 0.0102 443
13 7.75 0.22 1.68 0.015 0.00 0.000 0.005 0.0105 456
14 7.50 0.23 1.75 0.016 0.00 0.000 0.005 0.0109 474
15 7.30 0.25 1.83 0.016 0.01 0.000 0.005 0.0112 487
30 5.40 0.50 2.70 0.024 0.01 0.000 0.010 0.0138 600
60 3.70 1.00 3.70 0.033 0.02 0.000 0.021 0.0123 536
90 2.90 1.50 4.35 0.039 0.03 0.000 0.031 0.0077 335
120 2.40 2.00' 4.80 0.043 0.04 0.000 0.042 0.0013 56
180 1.80 3.00 5.40 0.048 0.06 0.000 0.063 0.0000 0
240 1.50 4.00 6.00 0.054 0.08 0.000 0.084 0.0000 0
360 1.12 6.00 6.72 0.060 0.13 0.000 0.125 0.0000 0
480 0.93 8.00 7.44 0.067 017 0.000 0.167 0.0000 0
720 0.70 12.00 8.40 0.075 0.25 0.000 0.251 0.0000 0
960 0.57 16.00 9.12 0.082 0.33 0.000 0.334 0.0000 0
1200 0.50 20.00 10.00 0.090 0.42 0.000 0.418 0.0000 0
1440 0.44 24.00 10.56 0.095 0.50 0.000 0.501 0.0000 0
MAXIMUM EQUILIZATION STORAGE REQUIRED = 0.0138 (AC/FT) 600 (CU/FT)
TREATMENT VOLUME = 0.0072 (AC/FT) 315 (CU/FT)
TOTAL VOL UME POND REQUIRED = 0.0210 (AC/FT) 915 (CU/FT)
• • ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS, INC.
1280 HEATHER RIDGE BOULDVARD, DUNEDIN, FLORIDA
MAY 12 2036
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CI-,f OF CLEARVJATER
STAGE STORAGE FOR: LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
REQ'D D.E.R. VOLUME 315 (C.F.)
BASIN AREA 7,560 (S.F.)
DEPTH OF RUNOFF 0.50 (Inch)
STORAGE TABULATIONS FOR VAULT VOID RATIO = 30 0
----
AREA @ T.O.B. 1364.0 ...................... EL 48.38
AREA @ BOTTOM 1364.0 : ...................... EL L - -45.88
STAGE SURFACE STORAGE STAGE SURFACE STORAGE
(msl) AREA (CU FT) (msl) AREA (CU FT)
45.88 1364 0 47.16 1364 525
45.94 1364 26 47.23 1364 551
46.01 1364 52 47.29 1364 577
46.07 1364 79 47.35 1364 603
46.14 1364 105 47.42 1364 630
46.20 1364 131 47.48 1364 656
46.26 1364 157 47.55 1364 682
46.33 1364 184 47.61 1364 708
46.39 1364 210 47.67 1364 734
46.46 1364 236 47.74 1364 761
46.52 1364 262 47.80 1364 787
DER 46.59 1364 289 47.87 1364 813
46.65 46.65 1364 315 47.93 1364 839
46.71 1364 341 48.00 1364 866
46.78 1364 367 48.06 1364 892
46.84 1364 393 48.12 1364 918
46.91 1364 420 48.19 1364 944
46.97 1364 446 48.25 1364 971
47.03 1364 472 48.32 1364 997
47.10 1364 498 48.38 1364 1023
03/27/2006
CLW
35
47.35
WFWMD
48.12
NOTE: ACTUAL VOLUME = 1176 CU FT WHEN STORAGE IN PIPES IS CONSIDERED
SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS, INC.
1290 HEATHER RIDGE BOYULEVARD, DUNEDIN, FLORIDA
EXFILTRATION TRENCH CALCULATION
27-Mar-06
PROJ.: ;-LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
V
L
K(H2W + 2H2Du - Du2 + 21-1213s) + (1.39 x 10"-4) WDu
L = LENGTH OF TRENCH REQUIRED (FEET)
V = VOLUME TREATED (ACRE-INCHES)
W = TRENCH WIDTH (FEET)
K = HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CFS/FT2 - FT HEAD)
H2 = DEPTH TO WATER TABLE (FEET)
Du = NON-SATURATED TRENCH DEPTH (FEET)
Ds = SATURATED TRENCH DEPTH (FEET)
NOTE SOLVING FOR "L" (LENGTH OF TRENCH)
QUALITY + QUANTITY
rrrFN rr.F?
V = 0.17989 (AC. IN.) 315 - 338
Du = r 2.50 (FT.)
Ds = 0.00 (FT.)
H2 = ; 3.00 (FT.) (BELOW TOP OF VAULT MATERIAL)
W = r 22.00 (FT.)
K = r 0.00018
L = 8.53 (CALCULATED LENGTH IN FEET)
L = 17 (SAFETY FACTOR OF TWO)
(ACTUAL LENGTH USED = 62 FEET TO PROVIDE STORAGE PER CLEARWATER CODE)
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
111M 12 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLER.RWATER
• 0
SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS, INC.
1280 HEATHER RIDGE BOULEVARD, DUNEDIN, FLORIDA
EXFILTRATION TRENCH RECOVERY TIME CALCULATION
PROD.: I BR OFFICE EXPANSION 27-Mar-06
SOLVING FOR "T" (SYSTEM RECOVERY TIME - HOURS)
L = LENGTH OF TRENCH REQUIRED (FEET)
H = TRENCH HEIGHT (FEET)
W = TRENCH WIDTH (FEET)
VR = PERCENT VOIDS IN TRENCH FILL
K = HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CFSIFT2 - FT HEAD)
I = HYDRAULIC GRADIENT
N = PIPE SIZE (INSIDE DIAMETER IN INCHES)
# = NUMBER OF PIPES
T = SYSTEM RECOVERY TIME (HOURS)
A = HORIZONTAL CROSS SECTION OF TRENCH (SQUARE FEET)
Q = FLOW RATE (VOLUME/TIME)
V = REQUIRED VOLUME (TREATMENT + ATTENUATION)
V = 653 (C.F.) r -------? r --338 i)
- - -315 +
------ ---------
TRENCH VOLUME (AT 30% VOIDS)
VR = _
r 30%
H = 2.5
W = 22_0
L
N = -
-
12
# = 5
VOLUME IN PIPE = 219.20 (C.F.)
TRENCH VOLUME = 957.24 (C.F.)
TOTAL VOLUME = 1176.44 (C.F.)
RECOVERY TIME "Q = KIA"
K = _0.00018
I = 0.1000
A = 1364.0 (TRENCH LENGTH x WIDTH)
Q = 0.024552 (FLOW RATE -VOLUME/TIME)
H( OURS)
TOTAL RECOVERY TIME = 7.4
NOTE: "K" VALUE IS ESTIMATED FROM SDS DATA FOR Up (PAMELLO BASED) SOILS AT LOWER
LEVEL OF RANGE OF PERMEABILITY. TOTAL VOLUME IS BASED ON CITY OF
CLEARWATER MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR STORAGE.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
HAY 12 2036
PLANNING DEPP.RTMENT
CITY OF CLFk.1?V.!ATER
12!13/2005 11-31
rAT104" 1641
7274419
LEWIS BIRCH RICARDU
0
PAGE 02
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
s•c nMEk?e
k •1
ISSUED BY
MAR 2 9 2006
p1 pNNING LEARWATER
CITY o.
First American Title Insurance Company
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of California, herein
called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies
of title insurance as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule
A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred
to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions
of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof.
T'Ws Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the
amount of the policy or policies vommitted for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the
Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement.
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such. policy or policies of title insurance
and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the
Effective Date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first
occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company.
This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until Schedule A has been countersigned by
either a duly authorized agent or representative of the Company and Schedule B-1 and B-11 have
been attached hereto,
IN WITNIESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and scaled,
to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accord-
ance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown. in Schedule A as
"Effective Date".
First American Title Insurance Company
By PRESIDENT
SECRETARY
ALTA. COMMITMENT u 1966 ? 61
a
12/1 :;/:2wub 11:.11 12 14411 4'3'J
a
LtWl?D BIHUH H1LF?KUU
I'Alit U-1
FATIC-700 EN])ORStMENT #
ISSUED BY
Fn-st Arnerican Title Insu ranCC M-Pany
w Attached to Policy No. A- 9 8- 0 3 3 9 9 8
Issuing office File No: 14569.01
Schedule A item # 2 (a) Amount of policy .$ 750,040..00
Proposed insured, L.B.R. Holdings, Inc.
Schedule A Item # 2 (b) A.L.T.A. Doan policy : $600,000.00
Proposed insured : SOTJ'i"HTRTJST BANK,N.A. , its
successors and/or assigns.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
a All other matters shall remain the same
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
This endorsement is made a part of the policy and is subject to all of the terms and provisions thereof and of any
prior endcKsernents thereto. Except to the extent expressly stated, it neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of
the policy and any prior endorsements, xcor does it extend the effective date of the policy and any prior endorsements, nor
does it increase the face amount Thereof.
This endorsement shall not be valid or binding unless signed by either a duly authorized officer or agent of the
Company.
Issue Date: dune 4, 1998 FmstAav can RIc Insurance Company
Waller & Mitchell
_ bY. FRES7DENT
oveffi-ine name of Agent) d yi11EM9F9 i., ;
1881 a
Bye ?.$ rA `+y ``"+ ArrMT: st.L - ?SECRETARY
thorized Signatory
•0
i'+
MAR 29 '2006
M"S)
1L/13/LGYJ7 11:,31 /L/44114yJ LtW15 i31K.UH K1l:AI?UU
PATSC.30) (aev. t-1e) 0 t •
First Aimerican Title Insurance Company
5CH + ULE A
Agent's File, No.: 9$-03399-$ Comautmenc No. FA-CC- . 14 5 6 9. 01
Date Issued: June 1, 19 9 $ 03 t 01 YX
Effective Date: Nay 19 r 19 9 8 08100 ADS
2. Policy or Pollcisa m he issued: Amount of Policy: $ T . B . D .
(¢) A. L. T. A. Owner's Policy (10/17/92) (wish Florida Modifications)
Propoead Insured: ACCOUNTING DIVERSIFICATIONS INC.
(b) A. L T. A. Loan Policy (10/17/92) (with Florida Modifications) S
Proposod Insstred:
HAUL U4
SJL
3. TGa-eatata or itderest• in thtr land described or refettad to W" Coaualumt••and covered herein Is an estate or interest designated as Wows:
Fee Simple
4. Title to the estates or b terast in the Laud described of feffizW, to *in th% Commitment and Covered herein (and dcsigDatW AS indicated in No.
3 above) ls, at the effoctive ells hereof, vested m!
INTSRgHAS&, xrrC. , a Florida Corporation ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAR 2 9 2000
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
s. "rite last referred to in thla Ctuwt aw u is in dx CITY OF CLEARWATER
StUe of Florida Canty of Pinellas
and described rue can:
Lots 0, 9 AND 10, Block Et BREEZE HILL, according to the plat
thereof, recorded in Plat Book 13, Page(s) 66, Public Records of
Pinellas County, Florida.
Waller a Xitehell
(1n?art iav name of Asent)
By;
Au Slgroetnry
11/1;If20db 11:'J1 12 e44114'J'J LEW15 li1KUH K1UAKUU
PATIL•2M tRv, %7M .
First American Title Insurance Company
SCHEDULE B-1
(Requirements)
Agent's
File No.: 98-03399-8
Commitment No. FA-CC-
SJTL
HAUL ob
The following are the requirements to be compiled with,
1. Payment to, or for the account of, the gnators or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to
be insured.
2. Payment of ail taxes, assessments, levied and assessed against subject premises, which are due and payable.
3. Satisfactory cvidence shall be produced that all i Vrovements sudlor repaits or alterations thereto are completed;
that contractor, subcontractor, labor and =erlalmen are paid in full.
4. lusuumenu in insurable form which must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record:
A. Submit a proper Owner/Seller's Affidavit satisfactory to insure
against unrecorded mechanic's liens.
B. Submit a proper survey certified to all parties involved in this
transaction, including but not limited to,.First American Title
Insurance Company.
C. Warranty Deed from INTERPHASE, INC., a a Florida Corporation, to
ACCOUNTING DIVERSIFICATIONS INC. conveying propar.ty described in
Schedule A.
D. Satisfactory evidence must be furnished as to -the proper
incorporation of INTERPHASS, INC., a a Florida corporation, prior to
the acquisition of property described in Schedule A, together with
proof as to the current. status of said corporation. If the dale is
in the regular course of the corporation's business, the
requirements of Section 607.1201, F.S., must be met. If the sale is
not in the regular course of the corporation's business, the
requirements of Section 607.1202, F.S., must be met. The Company
reserves the right to make such additional requirements as it may
deem necessary.
E. Satisfactory evidence must be furnished as to the proper
incorporation of ACCOUNTING DIVERSIFIC)LTIONS INC., a corporation,
prior to the acquisition of property described in Schedule A,
together with proof as to the current status of said corporation.
The Company resezvos the right to make such additional requirements
as it may doom necessary.
See Attached Schedule B-1 Continued
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAR 2 9 2006
PLANNING DEPARTN"' it r
Clly OF CLEAX, :?
11/1:?/20k7) l l: it (Y /44 y'7 !_?W15 J31kU'H i-e1UAh:UU
• W10600 (per. 9.71) 0
First American Title Insurance Company
SCHEDULE
8-1
(Continued)
Agent's File No. 98-03399-8
No... Comaut=t No. FA-CC- SJL
Policy No.:
HAL*- bb
8-1
F. Written evidence, from appropriate governmental authorities,
that City and County Special Assessment Liens, and water, sewar
and trash removal charges, if any, have been paid.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAR 2 9 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMEW
CITY OF CLEARWATE"
12/13/2005 11:31 72744 99 LEWIS BIRCH RICARDO PACE UI
PAT - tW (R^. VIM) ' , , ,
First American 'title Insurance Company
SCHEDULE B-II
(Exceptions)
Agent's
File No.: 98-03399-8 Corrunitment No. FA-CC
t3JL
Sehedule $ of the policy or policies to be Issued will contain exception$ to the followingmatters unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company.
7 . Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters, if any, created, first appearwg in the public records
or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of
record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.
1, Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public records.
4. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey
or inspection of the premises.
5. Any lien, or right ton a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not
shown by the public records.
6. Any adverse claan to any portion of said land which has been • created by artificial means or has accreted to any such
portion so created and riparian rights, if any,
7. Taxes or special assessments which are tot shown as existing liens by the public records,
8. The lien of the Taxes for the year 1998, and all subsequent years, which
are not yet due and payable.
1997 Taxes Gross Amount $7489.08 - PAID -
$7,264.41 on December 31, 19971 Total Assessed Value $328,100.00
Taxing Districts Cw - CLEARWATER
Homestead Exemption filed for 1997? NO
Other Exemptionss NOME
Parcel No. 14/29/15/10854/005/0080 (as to lot 8)
9. The lien of the Taxes for the year 1998, and all esubsequent years, which
are not yet due and payable.
1997 Taxes (arose Amount $1257.69 - PAID
$1,219.96 on December 31, 19971 Total Assessed Value $55,100.00
Taxiing District; CW - CLEARWATER
Homestead Exemption filed for 1997? NO
Other Exemrptiona t NONE
Parcel No. 14/29/15/10854/005/0090 (as to lot 9)
10. The lien of the Taxes for the year 1998, and all subsequent years, which
are not yet due and payable.
1997 Taxes (gross Amount $1298.78 - PAID
$1259.82 on December 31, 1997' Total Angesised Value $56,900.00
Taxing Districts CW - CLEARWATER
Homestead Exemption filed for 1997? NO
Other Exemptionat NONE
Parcel No. 14/29/15/10854/005/0100 (as to lot 10)
Sea Attached Schedule B-2 Continued
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAR 2 9 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
12/"lam/20?Jb 11: ?1 /' 14414yy LEWIS BIRCH K1IU4RUU FIAU- 08
VATIC-4W IRV. VS) • ti'
First American Title Insurance Company
SCHEDULE B-2 (Continued)
Age3lt's
Fite No.. 98-03399-8 Commitment No. FA-CC-
BJL
Policy No.;
it . Personal Property Taxes for the year 1997 - PAID)
Account No. 1899421
Paid December 31, 1997, in the amount of $188.96
la. subject to all matters as shown and set forth at the plat of BREEZE
HILL, as recorded in Plat Book 13, page(s) 66, of the public Records of
Pinellas County, Florida.
13. Distribution $asement gra=ted to Florida Power Corporation by instrument
recorded in O.R. Book 6784, page 1223, Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida.
14. Terms and Conditions of that certain un-recorded Lease by and between
DOXALD F, ZIPERT, Lessor and RODGERS & CU1KINGS INSURANCE, INC4, Lessee
dated December 3, 1987, as disclosed. by...Inatrument recorded December .17,
1987 in OR Book 6645, page 1470, Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida,
15. Terms and provisions of all eagreements. and franchises pertaining to the
coat, installation, operation, and maintenance of gas, water and/or
sewer f=acilities. (Owner's Policy only)
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAR 2 9 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
G7/':/IZU00 IU; O! /[/4411477 l.GW1J mlmlLn M..ti Wu I--u" ?+=
Prepared By.
RECORD & RETLI N TO:
SOMERS TITLE COMPANY
1290 COURT STREET
CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 441-1088
incidental to the issuance of a title insurance policy.
File Number. 03060054c
parcel 11D 14:14-29-15-10854-005-0110
WARRANTY DEEP
(INDIVIDUAL)
This WARRA.NTT DEED, dated 7!2112003 by
Fay Allen , a single woman,
whose post office addresa is:
hereinafter called the GRANTOR, to
LBR MOLDINGS III, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company
whose post office address is: /tf0l 00C# CT SST
hereinafter called the GRANTEE:
(Wherver used herein the terms "Grantor" and ^Gran:ee" include all parties to this itas*rument and the heirs, legal
representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations.)
WITNESSE is That the GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations,
receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys atad confirms
unto the GRANTEE, all that certain lacad situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz;
Parcel No. 14-29-15-10854-005-0110
LOT 11, FLOCK "E", BREEZE EaLL, according to the xnap or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page
66, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAR 2 9.2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
99/22,'2995 19:57 7274411499 LEWIS BIRCH RICARDC PAGE 93
SUBJECT TO covenarts, conditions, restrictions, reservations, limitations, easements and agreements of record, if any.
taxes and assessments for the year 2003 and subsequent years; and to all applicable zoning ordinances 3ndlor restrictions
and probibi«.ons irnposed'rry governmental authorities, if any.
TOGETHER with, all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever.
AND THE GRANTOR hereby covenants with said GRANTEE that except as above noted, the GRAIN7GR is law !;ally
seized of said land in fee simple; t1mt the GRANTOR has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land;
that the GRANTOR hereby fully'warrants the title to said lsnd and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all
persons whomsocwer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTOR has signed and sealed these presents the date set forth above.
SIGNED 2-T T , RESENCE -F THE FOLLOWING WITNESSES:
Signature:._J`?
Print Nar e: ice,` r' fj` l? Fay Mle
Signature: Awa
Print Naine:
Statc of Florida
County of Pinellas
THE FOREGOING 12,TSTRMYIENT was sworn and acknowledged before me on 7121/2003 by:
Fay Aden S ,s siri&Ie wo=i,
who has produced drivers license as identification.
Notary:
Signature:
Print Name: RONALD E. SOMERS
Notary Seal y 801YA1,0 E. SWERS
Votary NOIC, State 9f Worlds
s. 5 tiFlCSXRm(9sinnExpirest1/7,06
Commission No, # DOi 48748
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAR 2 9 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
99, 22!2905 10: 57 7274411499 LEWIS BIRCH RICC,RDU
COMMITMENT
State: FL County: Pinellas
File Number: Commitment Nembec
03060054c CAA-1-1708-1067
1. Policy or Policies to be issued:
ALTA LOAN (10-17-92)
Proposed Insured Loan:
Ve Date & 71me:
19, 2003 @ 5PM
Schedule A
HAUL- 04
nsurance Number:
Amount
Amount
2nd Proposed Insured Loan:
ALTA OWNER'S (10-17-92) Amount
Proposed Insured Owners:
$109,000.00
LBR HOLDINGS 111, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability
Corporation
2, The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in the Commitment and covered herein
is:
Fee Slmpia
and is at the effective date hereof vested in:
Fay Alien
3. The land Is described as follows:
Parcel No. 14-29.15-10854-005-0110
LOT 11, BLOCK "E", BREEZE HILL, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat
gook 13, Page 66, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAR 2 9 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Issued Hy: 1708*g306005Ac CITY OF CLEA.RWATER
SOMERS TITLE COMPANY
1290 COURT STREET
4rW'g=,orized Signatory CLEARWATER, FL 337583
NOT :This Commihnent consists cf insert pages labeled In Schadule R, Schedule 8-5ectl0n 1, an-3 Schedule Meq Ion 2. This commitment
is of no force and effect unless alt schedules are indudad, Wong with any Ricer paces incorporated by mfsrenee in the insert pages.
091'22/2095 10, 57 7274411499 LEWIS BIRCH Rl( FAHVU HAUL r"T
COMMITMENT
Schedule B - Section I
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
1. Instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be approved, executed and fled for
record to wit:
a. Valid photo Identification (is: Driver's License, Passport) and social security cards
required of all parties to the transaction by the Insurer.
b. Warranty Dead to be executed by FAY ALLEN, joined by spouse if married, conveying
premises to LBR HOLDINGS, III, LLC., a Florida Limited Liability Corporation.
2. Payment of th+a full consideration to, or for the account of, the grantors or mortgagors.
Payment of all taxes, charges, assessments, levied and assessed against subject premises, which
are due and payable.
4. Satisfactory evidence should be had that improvements and/or repairs or aiterations thereto are
completed; that contractor, subcontractors, labor and materialmen are all paid.
5. Exceptions 3 and 4 of Schedule B - Section 2 of this commitment may be amended in or deleted
from the policy to be issued if a survey, satisfactory to the Company, is furnished to Company_
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
MAR 2 9 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTE: This Cernmit-ieril oortslats of Insert pages labeled In Schedule A, 6Chedule 8-Scwlan 1, and Schedule 13-Section 2. T1119 commitment
is of no force and effect unless all achedulee are included, along with any Rider pagea Incorporated by mferenca in the Insert pages.
Corrimi:rnent M. CM-1.1708-1007 2 Fie * 030600640
0 0
LONG RANGE PIANNING
DEVELOPMENT Rimi-'w
September 14, 2006
Mr. Douglas Birch
LBR Holdings, III, LLC
1401 Court Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
C ITY OF C LEARWATE R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Posr OPr•ICI: Box 4748, CIYARWA"rGR, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BOILDINC, 100 Sour1-I MYRTLI? AvENUH, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
Tlal:•:movl: (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
Re: FLD2005-11114 (1401 Court Street)
Dear Mr. Birch:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development
Code. On August 15, 2006, the CommunityDevelopment Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development
request to reduce the south (rear) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet within the Office (O) District, pursuant to
Section 2-1003.F of the Community Development Code; and to allow non-residential off-street parking within
the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with deviations to the south (front) setback from 25 feet
to 10 feet and west (front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet; and to allow the encroachment of a drive aisle within
the required sight visibility triangles along South Hillcrest Avenue as a Residential Infill Project, pursuant to
Sections 2-204.C and E of the Community Development Code. The CDB APPROVED the application based
upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, subject to the attached conditions of approval:
Findings of Fact:
1. That the subject properties total approximately 0.681 acres and are located on the east side of South
Hillcrest Avenue, between Court and Rogers Streets;
2. That the northernmost property is located within the Office (O) District and the Residential/Office General
(R/OG) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. That the southernmost property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and
the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category;
4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts; and
5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law:
1. That the encroachment of the north/south drive aisle upon the sight visibility triangles along South Hillcrest
Avenue will not result in the grant of a special privilege as similar reductions have been approved elsewhere
under similar circumstances;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-204 and 2-
1003 of the Community Development Code;
PRANK I I IM %1,1), INIA) (M
1OIIs DORAN, C(A \C11 IINI T I I())'r I kmll'iOx,
N1J. J()N,()N, (;rn N(.iiAi01hi ® C ri.FN A. I'rritr6(tx, O NCU11:\IHIT
„I:.(WAI. I'MIII. )1.NIPN1 AM) ATTi1,,m:\ i L: Acm I'.,\II'I c» hit
Development Order • •
1401 Court Street (FLD2005-1 1 1 14)
Page 2 of 3
That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per
Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and
That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per
Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Fire Department conditions must be addressed;
2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a tree preservation plan prepared by a certified arborist,
consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture must be provided. This
plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones
(drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts (i.e. crown elevating, root
pruning and/or root aeration systems). Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line,
actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), the tree barricade
detail, and any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation;
3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, evidence of filing a Unity of Title with Pinellas County
between all parcels involved in the application (14-29-15-10854-005-0080 and 14-29-15-10854-005-0110)
must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department;
4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a notation must be provided on the site plan stating that all
existing and proposed on-site utility facilities will be placed underground;
5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from F.D.O.T.
for work in the Court Street/S.R. 60 right-of-way must be provided;
6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit must be
provided;
7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the storm vault must be revised such that storm water
volume is stored in a vault or enlarged pipe system but not in the voids of a gravel bed. As the vault has no
positive outfall it is to be designed for a 50-year storm event with a 1-hour time of concentration. The high
water level in the vault is to designed to provide 6" of freeboard;
8. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing
or proposed, must be placed underground;
9. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any required Transportation Impact Fees must be
paid;
10. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all utility equipment, including but not limited to
electrical and water meters, must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they
are attached, as applicable;
11. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, adequate screening of the mechanical equipment
must be provided in the event that said mechanical equipment is visible from any adjacent right-of-way or
property;
12. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to
(or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff,
13. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity
and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by
the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the
installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department
requirements;
14. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the
construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to
which they are attached, as applicable;
15. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the
design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package
submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes:
Development Order •
1401 Court Street (FLD2005-1 1 1 14) .
Page 3 of 3
(a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and
size; and
(b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials
and architectural style of the building;
16. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board
approval (by August 15, 2007); and
17. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building
permit.
Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit shall be
made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by August 15, 2007). All required Certificates of
Occupancy must be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be
advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may
grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's
extension to initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or
pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by
this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require
this prior development approval.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539
or via e-mail at robert.tefftgmyclearwater.com.
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, ICP
Planning Director
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationslCourt Street 1401 LBR (O and LMDR) - ApprovedlCourt St 1401 -
Development Order - 09-14-06doc
7?•?'C y
r
400
LON(; RANGE PEANNENc
DBVEiE.ol'MEiNT RE?VEE?W
September 1, 2006
Mr. Douglas Birch
LBR Holdings, III, LLC
1401 Court Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
CITY. OF CLEARWATER
PIANNING DEPARTMENT
Pos-r OrrECr Box 4748, CLEARWATER, F!.oail)A 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL Si.-JmcE:s BiJILDING, 100 SOUTH MYR E.E: AVI.NUE, CLrARWATE?R, FLORIDA 33756
"I'E:LLPE EOM? (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
Re: FLD2005-11114 (1401 Court Street)
Dear Mr. Birch:
At its meeting of August 15, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your Flexible
Development application to reduce the south (rear) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet within the Office (O) District,
pursuant to Section 2-1003.F of the Community Development Code; and to allow non-residential off-street
parking within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with deviations to the south (front)
setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and west (front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet; and to allow the encroachment of
a drive aisle within the required sight visibility triangles along South Hillcrest Avenue as a Residential Infill
Project, pursuant to Sections 2-204.C and E of the Community Development Code, subject to conditions.
On August 31, 2006, revised plans were submitted to the Planning Department to address those above referenced
conditions. A review of those plans has been conducted and the following items remain outstanding:
? That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the plans must be revised to include a detail (i.e.
elevation) of the three-foot high buffer wall with adequate information as to its appearance;
? That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the landscape plan must be revised to include the
location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing landscape materials;
? That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the areas of excess pavement along the south side of the
one-way drive aisle lying east of the angled parking, and adjacent to the westernmost angled parking space
must be eliminated and incorporated into the adjacent landscape areas; and
? That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, a sight line study must be provided indicating the
mechanical equipment will not be visible from the South Hillcrest Avenue right-of-way, or that the plans
must be revised to include the adequate screening of the mechanical equipment.
Next Step: Submittal of Revised Plans
One complete set of plans (collated, folded and stapled) must be revised to address the above conditions of
approval and submitted to the Planning Department for review. Once the revised plans have been reviewed for
compliance with the above conditions, the Development Order for this project can be issued.
I'H.UK I IIIMAI U. \LM )R
I(!!N 1)(WAN, 0)I N( 11A NIM:N I IM-1 I1ANIII.WN, Curncn.?m.>uir:!:
hill 1ON,O\, C n xc.i i.>u:wsr!; (;n!u e?:\. PFIENSI:N, (:O[ N li.>ll WWR
"I?(n ;?!. I•:,?!r! ? n w.x r A?'n Arrir,?!:crn'!: ?\( r!(?? I•:\u?! uvrat"
September 1, 2006 • •
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 (1401 Court Street)
Page 2 of 2
Please be advised that the Flexible Development approval is valid for one year; thus expiring on August 15,
2007. Prior to this expiration date, the first building permit must be applied for in order for this proposal to be
considered established, and no permits may be applied for until the Development Order has been issued.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865
E-Mail: robert.to[Lt@myclearwater.com
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished Applications lCourt Street 1401 LBR (O and LMDR)-08-15- 06(R T) ICourt St 1401 -
Conditions of Approval 09-01-06doc
•
SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS, INC.
Consulting for Infrastructure and the Environment
"Professional Site Engineering and Building Design "
1280 HEATHER RIDGE BOULEVARD EB 8501
DUNEDIN, FLORIDA 34698 E-MAIL: pehagler@tampabay.rr.com
Letter of Transmittal
TO: C, 4y of ?lear wct le-I"
WE ARE SENDING YOU: J' Attached
VOICE: (727) 738-9025
FAX: (727) 738-9505
L ??ZOQ 5"-1111 ?
? Under separate cover via the following: ? Plans ? Survey
? Copy of Letter ? Aerial ? Legal Documents ? Shop Drawings
? Other
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
31 S% a
1 3 ?G? i ??f
I 31 k d
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
3' For approval ';Ir As requested ? For your use ? For review & comment
? Resubmit copies for approval ? Approved as noted ? Approved as submitted
? Other
REMARKS: ®C^C1l Im
NING EPARNEW
MOFr:l1A, M
COPY TO:
SIGNED: A-e? -
LA
v41 '_
O'Keefe Architects Inc.
2424 Curlew Road
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
Phone: (727) 781-5885
Fax: (727) 781-0255
Email:
GRAHAM@okeefearch.com
Letter of
TRANSMITTAL
We are sending:
® Attached Under separate ?
cover
The Followina:
® Prints Product Data ?
? Specifications Shop Dwgs ?
? Copy of Letter Samples ?
? Orig Drawings Appl for Pay ?
? Other Change Order ?
? CD Req. For Info ?
Via:
? Priority Overnight Facsimile ?
? Stand. Overnight E-mail ?
? 2^d Day Air Hand Deliver ?
? 3 Day Air Spec. Delivery
?
? Mail
Action:
? Approval No Exceptions ?
Taken
? Review & Make Correct. ?
Comment Noted
® Use & Revise & ?
Information Resubmit
? Records Rejected ?
? Signature Submit ?
Specified Item
0
To: SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS INC.
1280 HEATHER RIDGE BLVD.
DUNEDIN, FL.
Attn: ROGER SHINHOLSER
Date: Thursday, August 31, 2006
Project: LBR OFFICE ADDITION
Proj. No: 0464 File No: 4.4 Civil Engineer Correspondence
Copies Date Description
1 SIGNED AND SEALED FINAL SUBMITTAL SET
FOR THE CITY OF CLEARWATER
If enclosures are not as noted, Please Notify us Immediately.
Number of Pages (including this cover sheet)
Hardcopy to Follow ? (if checked)
Remarks:
Signed :
Copies To:
? Owner ? Contractor ? Regulatory Agency ?
RECEIVED
AUG 31 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
File: GRAHAWDocumentl
0
Frr??r
.',Y?'91-. ;11th
r}w/R
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT RIiVII:W
August 15, 2006
Mr. Douglas Birch
LBR Holdings, III, LLC
1401 Court Street
Clearwater, FL 33756
0
CITY OF C LEARWATE R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Possr OE;r(c:E Box 4748, CLE.ARWATE.R, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL. Si:im Es B(IIL)INC, 100 Soui-ii MvR'rLi; AVEWT', CLEARWA.rER, FLORIDA 33756
TEAL IIONI? (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
Re: FLD2005-11114 (1401 Court Street)
Dear Mr. Birch:
At its meeting of August 15, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible
Development application to reduce the south (rear) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet within the Office (O) District,
pursuant to Section 2-1003.F of the Community Development Code; and to allow non-residential off-street
parking within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with deviations to the south (front)
setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and west (front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet; and to allow the encroachment of
a drive aisle within the required sight visibility triangles along South Hillcrest Avenue as a Residential Infill
Project, pursuant to Sections 2-204.C and E of the Community Development Code. The CDB APPROVED the
application with conditions. Among those conditions were the following items, which must be addressed prior
to the issuance of a Development Order for the application:
?LiThat prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the plans must be revised to include a detail (i.e.
elevation) of the three-foot high buffer wall with adequate information as to its appearance;
That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the landscape plan must be revised to provide additional
groundcovers/shrubs adjacent to the east fagade of the screen wall where not impacted by the existing root
systems and not compromising maintenance access;
ro That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the landscape plan must be revised to include the
location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing landscape materials;
That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the areas of excess pavement along the south side of the
one-way drive aisle lying east of the angled parking, and adjacent to the westernmost angled parking space
must be eliminated and incorporated into the adjacent landscape areas; and
That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, a sight line study must be provided indicating the
mechanical equipment will not be visible from the South Hillcrest Avenue right-of-way, or that the plans
must be revised to include the adequate screening of the mechanical equipment.
I r\NK I IIItMAItU, INI\)OR
Dol"; n, C(A NCHAILMI T I I(WI I IA\Ill;f( N, COI'\CII_\iOIHI'R
wn:r ® CIANI.i N A. h:rnr?hT, CU( \C I X11':WWR
August 15, 2006 •
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 (1401 Court Street)
Page 2 of 2
Next Step: Submittal ofRevised Plans
One complete set of plans (collated, folded and stapled) must be revised to address the above conditions of
approval and submitted to the Planning Department for review. Once the revised plans have been reviewed for
compliance with the above conditions, the Development Order for this project can be issued.
Please be advised that the Flexible Development approval is valid for one year; thus expiring on August 15,
2007. Prior to this expiration date, the first building permit must be applied for in order for this proposal to be
considered established, and no permits maybe applied for until the Development Order has been issued.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865
E-Mail: robert. tefft@a,myclearwater. com
S:Tlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications I Court Street 1401 LBR (O and LMDR)-08-15-06(RT) ICourt St 1401 -
Conditions ofApprova108-15-06.doc
08/10/2006 10:01 7274411 LEWIS BIRCH RIC* PAGE 01
FAX. COVER SHEET
I
CSRT,f mDPvzucAccov-wAM
Clearwater friice:
1401 Court St.
Clearwater, FL 33756
Phone, (727) 446-3058
Fax: (727) 441-1499
www.lbritc.com
Send to:
Attention:
Fax
Phone #.
Urgent
I?.J Reply ASAP
From:
Susan Mabes
pate:
8/10/2006
Phone #:
ElRease review and process
F7Far your information
Total pages, including cover sheet:
Comments:
Robert -
Per out conversation, I am faxing letters from the immediate neighbors
1400 Rogers. None of these neighbors have objections to the develop
Please call or email if you.need any additional information.
IAOO-
Susan L Mabes
Firm Administrator
121
1401 Court Street and
nt proposal.
-'his facsimile Contains privileged and confidential information intended only for use or the addressee above.
if you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible to transmit It to the nded reciplent, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination or copying of this facsimile is strictly prohibited, itt ou have received this famimile
In error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original to us a he above address by U. S. Mail.
Thank you.
Tampa Offic :
1530 W Cleveland St
Tampa, FL 33606
Phone: 813-594-1400
Fax: 813-594-1408
"Assur ce and accounting services
* Busin and individual tax services
Litigation support
I
* In o tment advisory services
• co g ultina services, including.
Financial management
- Financial planning
- No omputer accounting systems
- Estate planning
city of Ciearwater
Planning Department
Robert.G. Tefft, Planner Iii
727•-562-4865
727-562-4567
08!1012006 10:01 7274411499 LEWIS BIRCH ?R?ICARDO PAGE 02
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Dear Sir or Madam:
I am (we are) the owner(s) of the property located a
(we) have reviewed. the City of Clearwater Plann
Deport for Case Number FLD2005-01114 for the
Holdings, 111, LLC. Based on the plans, as submits
approved by the planning department, I (we) ha
Community Development Board's approval of such
Ae---7who /;""
Owner's Signature
Owner (print name)
0 Co
Date
1401 Rogers Street. I
ig Department's Staff
c)wner applicant, LBR
d by the owner and as
no objection to the
s Signature (Spouse)
(print name)
Date
Property Address
08/10/2006 10:01 72744114 LEWIS BIRCH R?ICARD PAGE 03
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Dear Sir or Madam:
I am (we are) the owner(s) of the property located a
(we) have reviewed the City of Clearwater Plann:
Report for Case Number FLD2005-01114 for the
Holdings, III, LLC. Based on the plans, as submitt
approved by the planning department, I (we) ha`
Community Development Board's approval of such 1
9
Owner's Signature
Owner (print name)
:Date
1404 Rogers Street
Property Address
1404 Rogers Street. I
(g Department's Staff
?wner applicant, LBR
3 by the owner and as
no objection to the
•oi ect.
is Signatur pouse)
JgrJ0 z--?>ry
?er (print name)
-, Z 3 0 G
Date
08/10/2006 10:01 7274411499
•
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Dear Sir or Madam:
LEWIS BIRCH
I am (we are) the owner(s) of the property located
(we) have reviewed the City of Clearwater P1am
Report for Case Number FLD2005-01114 for the
Holdings, XII, LLC. Based on the plans, as submit
approved by the planning department, I (vote) hz
Community Development Board's approval of such
Owners Signature
? v r f?o r? 1 S 6e,4 ? S
Owner (print name)
Date
ICARDO
0
PAGE 04
1405 Rogers Street. I
ag Department's Staff
owner applicant, LBR
;d by the owner and as
e no objection to the
iroi ect.
S Signature (Spouse)
(print name)
Date
405 Rogers Str
Property Address
08/10/2006 10:01 7274411499 LEWIS BIRCH RICARDO PAGE 05
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Dear Sir or Madam:
I am (we are) the owner(s) of the property located
(we) have reviewed the City of Clearwater Plan
Report for Case Number FLD2005-01114 for the
Holdings, 111, LLC. Based on the plans, as submit
approved by the planning department, I (we) h
Community Develppmtnt approval of such
s Signature (Spouse)
7Z
XOner rintsame)
e, ate
14081
1408 Rogers Street. I
g Department's Staff
owner applicant, LBR
d by the owner and as
e no objection to the
(print name)
Date
Property Address
f// ? U// pN/ L'AP? /lIy(y[?
14W e" r If -
Jun 13 06 08:33p p.l 0 19 To: Robert G. Tefft
From: Ralph Spencer
City of Clearwater Planning's fax number: 727-562-4865
Robert, 14
with Thanks for taking the time to discuss heD 4D Court St & 1400on
the
Monday. As I requested, I would like
Rogers St removed from the consent agenda so this can be
discussed.
Once this has been done, will you send me a fax at 813-366-0055
a note to let me know this is taken care of.
Thanks,
Ralph Spencer
1`.
0
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865
0
o
} arwater
U
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
Date: June 16, 2006
To: Douglas Birch, (727) 441-1499
From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
Re: FLD2005-11114 - 1401 Court Street
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 10
Comments: Please find attached a copy of the staff report for the above referenced development
proposal. This item has been scheduled for the Community Development Board (CDB)
meeting of June 20, 2006. Please be advised that the item has been removed from the
Consent Agenda upon the written request of a citizen. As such, a hearing will be held
on this item.
** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefna,myclearwater.com **
** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvcleanvater.com **
J
Jun. 16 2006 04:29PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94411499 Jun.16 04:25PM 04'19 SND 10 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
11.00 am Case Number: FLD2005-11 114 - 1401 COURT ST
Owner(s): Lbr Holdings Inc
1401 Court St
Clearwater, Fl 33756
TELEPHONE: 727-446-3058, FAX: 727-441-1499, E-MAIL: No Email
Location: The 0.667-acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of Court Street and South Hillcrest Avenue.
Atlas Page: 297A
Zoning District: O, Office
Request: Flexible Development Application to allow non-residential off-street parking within the Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR) District as a Residential Infill Project, pursuant to Section 2-204.E., with
deviations to the south (front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and west (front) setback from 25 feet to 10
feet; and a Flexible Standard Development request to reduce the south (rear) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet
within the Office (O) District, pursuant to Section 2-1003.F.
Proposed Use: Off-street parking
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, F133758
P O Box 8204
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III
Attendees Included:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
1 . Prior to CDB:
1. Show how a solid waste vehicle with a turning radius of 30 feet will be able to access proposed
dumpster pad.
2. Parking lot aisle width of 24 feet is required; plan indicates 22.8 foot dimension on new
(Hillcrest Avenue) parking lot. (As the width of the drive aisle must be 24 foot wide for
Engineering and Fire Dept. requirements it is recommended that the sidewalk be moved closer to
the Hillcrest Ave. roadway and allow the drive aisle to be closer to the property line with some of
the landscaping encroaching into the road right-of-way.)
3. Sidewalk along Hillcrest Avenue meanders into private property. Either relocate entirely into
street right-of-way or deed to City of Clearwater a sidewalk easement. A sidewalk easement shall
be deeded prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit:
1. Replace dumpster detail on Page C-4. New dumpster enclosures: Maximum 6'-0" high and
constructed of concrete block. Materials used should be consistent with those used in the
construction of and architectural style of the principal building, see City of Clearwater Contract
Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701.
2. Provide a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from D.O.T. prior to issuance of a building
permit. (For work in Court Street/S.R. 60 right-of-way.)
3. City will not require easement over proposed underground stormwater vault.
General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy
site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements,
the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense (City Ordinance
7573-06). If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be
completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
No Issues.
Fire:
Fire issues to be addressed prior to building permit approval: Fire sprinkler, Fire alarm, Fire
seperation requirements. Other issues may present themseves during permit review.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 4, 2006 - Page 13
?J
Harbor Master:
No Comments
Legal:
No Comments
Land Resources:
Show all trees with their canopies, on all of the civil plans prior to CDB.
Remove the "RIBBON" tree barricade detail prior to building permit.
C?
J
3 , Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape
architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed
building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to
be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning
and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line,
actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and
the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation.
Provide prior to building permit.
Landscaping:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 4, 2006 - Page 14
•
Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D. I., a twelve foot (12') wide landscape buffer consisting of one (1)
tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage is required along the east perimeter of the parcel
consisting of the proposed parking lot. The proposed landscape plan does not meet this
requirement.
04/04/06: The revisions to the landscape plan do not provide for 100% shrub coverage within
the required buffer area. Revised plans addressing this comment must be provided prior to
proceeding before the Community Development Board.
Pursuant to Section H of the application, the landscape plan shall include the following:
(a) delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
(b) sight visibility triangles;
(c) delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscape islands and curbing; and
(d) plant schedule with a key indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all
existing and proposed landscape materials.
Items "a" and "c" have not been addressed; item "b" has not been addressed in a manner
consistent with the Code (ref: Section 3-904); and with regard to item "d", the quantities have
not been provided.
04/04/06: The comments pertaining to "a", "b" and "c" remain unaddressed. With regard to
"d", while the quantities have been provided, all information pertaining to the existing
landscaping has been removed with the revision. Revised plans addressing this comment must
be provided prior to proceeding before the Community Development Board.
Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1., a ten foot (10') wide landscape buffer consisting of one (1)
tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage is required along the south and west perimeteres of the
parcel of the proposed parking lot. As proposed, the south and west perimeters are inconsistent
with the above requirement. Please be advised that pursuant to 3-1202.D.2. the front slopes of
stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50% of any required landscape buffer width
provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six
inches (6") below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet (5')
in width.
04/04/06: The above commment has been addressed with the noted exception of the provision
of 100% shrub coverage within the required buffer area. Revised plans addressing this
comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the Community Development Board.
4. There are four (4) Eagleston Holly trees proposed within the canopies of the existing Oak trees.
It is unlikely that the root system of the Oaks would enable the planting of the Holly's, and even
if they could be planted the canopy would likely severely limit the life of the Holly's. It is
suggested that more shade tolerant planting are provided beneath the Oaks. Revised plans
addressing this comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the Community
Development Board.
5 . The landscape plan does not depict the proposed three foot (3') high screen wall adjacent to the
proposed parking spaces. Also, the landscape plan does not depict any of the required curbing.
Revised plans addressing this comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the
Community Development Board.
Parks and Recreation:
No Comments
Stormwater:
Prior to issuance of a building permit the following requirements are to be met:
1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit
2) The storm water retention volume can be stored in a vault or enlarged pipe system but not in
the voids of a gravel bed. As the vault has no positive outfall it is to be designed for a 50 year
storm event with a 1 hour time of concentration. The high water level in the vault is to designed
to provide 6" of freeboard.
Solid Waste:
No Comments
Traffic Engineering:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 4, 2006 - Page 15
•
0
Show 20' x20' sight visibility triangles on for driveway along Court Street. (Community
Development Code Section 3-904)
2. Provide a note on both the civil and architectural site plans that reads: The minimum vertical
height clearance for covered parking shall be a minimum of 8' 2" from the ground to the lowest
over hanging structure i.e. conduits, beams, light fixtures, pipes and any other structures for
ADA parking compliance.
3. Handicap parking stall on east side of building shall comply with City's dimensional
standards and include 5'x 18' access aisle. (Community Development Code Section 3-1409)
4. Driveway width along S. Hillcrest Avenue shall be 24' wide for bi-directional traffic.
5. Drive aisle width for 90 degree parking shall be 24' wide.
6. Depth Dimension for 45 degree parking must be 19.5'.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Planning:
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. (City's
Community Development Code, Section 3-904).
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 4, 2006 - Page 16
•
•
1 . Pursuant to Section 3-911, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed
underground.
04/04/06: Comment has not been addressed. Provide a notation on the plans with regard to the
above in order to achieve compliance with this comment. Revised plans addressing this comment
must be provided prior to proceeding before the Community Development Board.
2. Pursuant to Section 3-1204.D., all landscaping must be protected from vehicular/pedestrian
traffic by the installation of curbing and wheelstops.
04/04/06: Curbing has been indicated on the plans; however the extent to which such curbing is
proposed is unclear by the plans. Clearly depict ALL curbing on both the site and landscape
plans. Revised plans addressing this comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the
Community Development Board.
3. Pursuant to Section 3-1701, sidewalks are required to be provided along the South Hillcrest
Avenue and Rogers Street rights-of-way.
04/04/06: It is noted that sidewalks have been provided as per the above comment; however a
determination as to the sidewalks being located in an acceptable manner will be made by the
Engineering Dept.
4. The handicap accessible parking is not in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA). Only one (1) handicap accessible parking space is proposed on the plans (despite what is
indicated on the site data table) and this parking space has niether the adequate width of twelve
feet (12') or the required five foot (5') wide access panel.
04/04/06: This comment has not been addressed. To clarify, the existing "handicap accessible"
parking space on the east side of the building is only 11.37 feet wide and does not have an access
panel; thus it does not meet the requirement of the A.D.A. as a handicap accessible parking
space. Further, the proposed "handicap accessible" parking space on the south side of the
building does not meet the required 12 foot x 18 foot dimensions (the northeast corner has been
clipped - handicap or not the full space needs to be provided). Revised plans addressing this
comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the Community Development Board.
The response provided to Residential Infill criterion #2 does not provide any evidence to support
the claim that the replacement of a single family residence with a non-residential parking lot in a
single family neighborhood will have an inconsequential effect on the value of the adjacent
properties to the east and south.
04/04/06: As with the previous response, no evidence is provided to support the claim made in
the revised response. Please be aware that in the criterion it is stated that the existing value of the
site and the proposed value of the site with improvements is to be provided. This comment must
be provided prior to proceeding before the Community Development Board.
The response provided to General Applicability criterion #6 does not address how the design of
the parking area minimizes adverse visual, acoustic and olfactory impacts on adjacent properties.
The response speaks only to the hours of operation. Provide a revised response that adequately
addresses this criterion.
04/04/06: The revised response remains incomplete with the full extent of the criterion. The
previously included language pertaining to hours of operation has been excluded from the revised
response. Also, with regard to the olfactory impacts, what landscaping will be emitting the
referenced "pleasant fragrance"? This comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the
Community Development Board.
Where is the mechanical equipment for the proposed building addition being accommodated?
04/04/06: The revised plans do not address the above comment. Revised plans addressing this
comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the Community Development Board.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 4, 2006 - Page 17
• •
Pursuant to Section 3-904.A., at street and driveway intersections, no structure or landscaping
may be installed that will obstruct views at a level between 30" above grade and eight feet (8')
above grade.
Sight visibility triangles are measured as follows: where a drive aisle intersects a right-of-way and
where two rights-of-way intersect, the sight visibility triangle is measured a distance of 20' along
each axis from the point of intersection.
04/04/06: As noted above, sight visibility triangles are also required where two rights-of-way
intersect. The revised plans have not provided this sight visibility triangle. Revised plans
addressing this comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the Community
Development Board.
Provide a Unity of Title for the parcels prior to the issuance of a building permit.
04/04/06: This will remain as a condition of approval for the development proposal.
10. The plans submitted previously with this application depicted the proposed building addition
extending only to the north side of the one-way drive aisle and having a setback of approximately
23', which exceeded the minimum requirement of Code. The revised plans submitted on
February 3, 2006, now depict the proposed addition extending across the one-way drive aisle and
having setback of ten feet (10'). The proposed ten foot (10') setback does not meet minimum
standard code; therefore a seperate Flexible Standard Application must be submitted for this
setback deviation. This application will be processed concurrently with the existing application
and will also be subject to approval by the Community Development Board (CDB).
04-04-06: The above condition requires the submittal of a seperate Flexible Standard
Development Application to request the building setback deviation along the south property line
of the Office (O) zoned property. No such application was submitted. Instead the deviation was
requested under the existing Residential Infill Application where such a deviation cannot be
requested (i.e. deviations for non-residentially zoned properties cannot be requested through
residential applications). Revised plans addressing this comment must be provided prior to
proceeding before the Community Development Board.
11 . The 11.88'x 34.56' paved area labeled as "1 parking space" at the north side of the site is more
likely intended as a loading space than a parking space. Relabel it as such and adjust the parking
calculations on the site data table accordingly. The use of the area as loading will also enable the
property to comply with the requirements of Section 3-1406.
04/04/06: While the parking calcuations appear to have been corrected, the site plan still refers to
the loading area as a parking space. Provide corrected notations and indicate that signage
identifying this space as being for loading will be provided. Revised plans addressing this
comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the Community Development Board.
12. Within the one-way drive aisle there are two width dimensions provided: 13 feet at the west end
of the drive aisle and 12 feet toward the east end of the drive aisle. Clarify what the actual width
of the drive aisle is. Revised plans addressing this comment must be provided prior to
proceeding before the Community Development Board.
13. Pursuant to Section 3-1402.A., the required drive aisle width for 90 degree parking is 24 feet.
The proposal depicts an inadequate width of 22.8 feet. Provide a revised site plan meeting the
above standard. Revised plans addressing this comment must be provided prior to proceeding
before the Community Development Board.
14. On the site plan (drawing C-2), at the southeast corner of the Office (O) zoned parcel there is a
notation for concrete (conc.); however this notation is within a landscape area. Please clarify.
Revised plans addressing this comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the
Community Development Board.
15. Incorporate the excess pavement along the south side of the one-way drive aisle (south southeast
of the handicap accessible parking) into the adjoining landscape area. Revised plans addressing
this comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the Community Development Board.
16. Incorporate the excess pavement adjacent to the westernmost angled parking space into the
adjacent landscape area. Revised plans addressing this comment must be provided prior to
proceeding before the Community Development Board.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 4, 2006 - Page 18
•
•
17. The plans appear to depict the curbing for the existing driveway along South Hillcrest Avenue as
remaining. Provide revised plans that depict its removal. Revised plans addressing this comment
must be provided prior to proceeding before the Community Development Board.
18. The driveway opening along South Hillcrest Avenue is only 15 feet wide. Is this proposed to be
one-way egress only? Clarify the inconsistency between the driveway and the adjoining drive
aisle. Revised plans addressing this comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the
Community Development Board.
19. Provide a detail of the proposed three foot (Y) high block wall buffer. Revised plans addressing
this comment must be provided prior to proceeding before the Community Development Board.
Other:
No Comments
Notes: This development proposal has been tentatively scheduled for the June 20, 2006 CDB agenda. In order to remain on this
agenda, submit 15 collated sets of revised plans and application materials addressing all of the above comments by Noon, May 11,
2006.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 4, 2006 - Page 19
•
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT °
earw
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE
_C1 a CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
May 1, 2006
Douglas Birch, LBR Holdings, III, LLC, (727) 441-1499
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
FLD2005-11114 - 1401 Court Street
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 8
Comments: Please find attached the Development Review Committee (DRC) comments for the
development proposal for 1401 Court Street (FLD2005-11114).
As you are aware, the DRC will discuss this development proposal at its meeting of
Thursday, May 4, 2006, at approximately 11:00am.
** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.teffi(i?mvclearwater.com **
** Visit the Planning Department online at wvvw.mycleanvater.com **
May. 01 2006 12:32PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94411499 May.01 12:29PM 02'53 SND 08 OK
TO TLFN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
0
11.30 am Case Number: FLD2005-11114 - 1401 COURT ST
Owner(s): Lbr Holdings Inc
1401 Court St
Clearwater, F133756
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Location: The 0.667-acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of Court Street and South Hillcrest Avenue.
Atlas Page: 297A
Zoning District: O, Office
Request: Flexible Development Application to allow non-residential off-street parking within the Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR) District as a Residential Infill Project, pursuant to Section 2-204.E., with
deviations to the south (front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and west (front) setback from 25 feet to 15
feet; and a Flexible Standard Development request to reduce the south (rear) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet
within the Office (O) District, pursuant to Section 2-1003.F.
Proposed Use: Off-street parking
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758
P O Box 8204
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III
Attendees Included:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
1 , 1. Inadequate vertical clearance is provided under building addition for solid waste vehicle to
drive through site (minimum clearance of 14 feet is required).
2. 30-foot turning radius is required at northerly entrance to property on Hillcrest Avenue.
Preceding comments shall be addressed prior to CDB.
The following shall be addressed by the applicant prior to issuance of a building permit:
3. If the occupancy of the proposed building is medical office, the applicant/owner will be
responsible for all associated fees for a required reduced pressure B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor
device).
4. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to
standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.)
5. New 5-foot sidewalk is required along entire Hillcrest Avenue frontage and 4-foot along
Rogers Street frontage per City's Standards and Specifications, and shall be installed prior to
issuance of a C.O. per Community Development Code Section 3-1701.
Sidewalks shall be shown on the plan prior to issuance of a building permit with upgrades and
new installation complete prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.).
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy
site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements,
the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense (City Ordinance
7573-06). If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be
completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
Environmental:
I . No Issues
Fire:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 2, 2006 - Page 19
• 0
1 . Fire issues to be addressed prior to building permit approval: Fire sprinkler, Fire alarm, Fire
seperation requirements. Other issues may present themseves during permit review.
2. 1. Must provide 30' radius at all vehicle access points.
2. Drive aisle must be a miniumum of 24' wide for emergency vehicle access.
3. Portiche must be at a minimum hieght of 14' fore emergency vehicle passage.
Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB
Harbor Master:
No Comments
Legal:
No Comments
Land Resources:
1 . Show all trees with their canopies, on all of the civil plans prior to CDB.
2. Install a landscape island in front of the 18" oak east of the proposed parking lot prior to CDB.
3. Remove the "RIBBON" tree barricade detail prior to building permit.
4. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape
architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed
building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to
be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning
and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line,
actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and
the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation.
Provide prior to building permit.
Landscaping:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 2, 2006 - Page 20
•
Pursuant to Section H of the application, the landscape plan shall include the following:
(a) delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
(b) sight visibility triangles;
(c) delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscape islands and curbing; and
(d) plant schedule with a key indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all
existing and proposed landscape materials.
Items "a" and "c" have not been addressed; item "b" has not been addressed in a manner
consistent with the Code (ref: Section 3-904); and with regard to item "d", the quantities have
not been provided.
2. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1., a twelve foot (12') wide landscape buffer consisting of one (1)
tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage is required along the east perimeter of the parcel
consisting of the proposed parking lot. The proposed landscape plan does not meet this
requirement.
3 . Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1., a ten foot (10') wide landscape buffer consisting of one (1)
tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage is required along the south and west perimeteres of the
parcel of the proposed parking lot. As proposed, the south and west perimeters are inconsistent
with the above requirement. Please be advised that pursuant to 3-1202.D.2. the front slopes of
stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50% of any required landscape buffer width
provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six
inches (6") below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet (5')
in width.
4. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1., the required interior landscaping shall constitute 10% of the
gross vehicular use area (4,572 SF). As such, a minimum 457.2 SF of interior landscaping is
required. A majority of the 1,990 SF of interior landscaping proposed actually constitutes
perimeter landscaping and cannot be counted toward meeting the interior landscape
requirement. Additionally, one (1) tree is required for every 150 SF of required interior
landscape area; shrubs shall constitute 50% of the required interior landscaping; and
groundcover shall be utilized for required interior landscaping in-lieu of turf/sod.
5. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.13.1., shade trees are required to be planted a minimum of five feet
(5') from any impervious area. While the Oak trees along the east perimeter of the parking lot
are existing, the location of an impervious area (parking lot) within five feet (5') of these trees
will result in the creation of a nonconformity with the above referenced section of the Code.
6. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1., the existing office parcel requires six (6) interior trees and
according to the landscap plan only two (2) currently exist on site, and of those two (2) trees
one (1) is proposed to be eliminated. As such, the existing nonconformity of the site will be
exacerbated and at a minimum the eliminated landscaping must be replaced elsewhere on site.
It is noted, however, that pursuant to Sections 3-1202.A.3.a. and 3-1401.B.3.a., if an existing
use is improved or remodled in value of 25% of more of the valuation of the principle structure
as reflected on the property appraisers current records, then the landscaping on site and the
parking area shall be brought into full compliance.
7. Please be advised that the landscaping located within the rights-of-way abutting the subject
property cannot be calculated toward meeting the interior/perimeter landscaping requirements
of the site. Further, those Oak trees clustered together along the south side of the parking lot
parcel are calculated as one (1) tree as they effectively exist as one tree with one canopy.
Parks and Recreation:
No Comments
Stormwater:
Prior to issuance of a building permit the following requirements are to be met:
1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit
2) The detention ponds are to be enlarged to meet City criteria. Specifically the design high
water level is to be 6 inches below top of bank. In the calculations you can not take full credit
for all existing impervious removed but only half credit. The minimum time of concentration is
to be 1 hour. Demonstrate that the outlet control structure for the existing pond is not being
compromised by the additional flow of water from the additional ponds.
3) Recommend that inlets or spillways be used to take runoff from the proposed parking lot into
the ponds to eliminate erosion of the north edge of the pavement.
Solid Waste:
No Comments
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 2, 2006 - Page 21
Traffic Engineering:
1 . Show 20' x20' sight visibility triangles on civil site plan and remove any objects that exceed the
City's height limitations. (Community Development Code Section 3-904)
2. Vertical height clearance for covered parking shall be a minimum of 8'2" to accommodate a
handicap van.
3. Columns for covered parking shall be protected from damage by vehicles striking them
(bollards, guard rail, etc).
4. Handicap parking stalls shall comply with City's dimensional standards. (Community
Development Code Section 3-1409)
5. Driveways along South Hillcrest Avenue do not comply with the Community Development
Code Section 3-102.D.1. (125-feet spacing required between driveways and intersections and
driveways) and Section 3-1402.13. (one driveway along any street). Either redesign or provide
analysis and report from Professional Engineer that current design is necessary to alleviate
congestion and improve traffic flow.
6. Provide angle of proposed angled parking and dimensions to demonstrate compliance with
Community Development Code Section 3-1402.A.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule.
(City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904).
Planning:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 2, 2006 - Page 22
•
1 . The response provided to General Applicability criterion #1 does not address how the proposed
parking area is consistent with the character of the adjacent properties. Provide a revised
response.
2. The response provided to General Applicability criterion #2 does not address how the proposal
will not hinder the appropriate use of adjacent land and buildings. Further, the parcel on which
the parking is to be constructed fronts on both South Hillcrest Avenue and Rogers Street. As
such, the provision of a revised response in necessary.
3. The response provided to General Applicability criterion #3 does not seem to address the subject
criterion ("There is no intersection or cross traffic with the existing residential area"). Clarify
what is intended with this response or provide a new response.
4. The response provided to General Applicability criterion #5 does not address how the parking is
consistent with the single family neighborhood to the east and south. Provide a revised response
that adequately addresses this criterion.
5. The response provided to General Applicability criterion #6 does not address how the design of
the parking area minimizes adverse visual, acoustic and olfactory impacts on adjacent properties.
The response speaks only to the hours of operation. Provide a revised response that adequately
addresses this criterion.
6. The response provided to Residential Infill criterion #2 does not provide any evidence to support
the claim that the replacement of a single family residence with a non-residential parking lot in a
single family neighborhood will have an inconsequential effect on the value of the adjacent
properties to the east and south..
7. With regard to the response provided to Residential Infill criterion #4, the functionality of the
existing parcel of land within the residential neighborhood has no bearing on the compatibility of
the proposed use with the adjacent uses. Provide a revised response that states how the
non-residential parking lot will be compatible with the adjacent uses including the single family
neighborhood.
8. With regard to the response provided to Residential Infill criterion #5, the statement that the
development proposal will add more open space is an erroneous one. As the property exists, the
structures cover approximately 29% of the property compared to approximately 60% as
proposed. Provide a revised response addressing how the immediate vicinity will be upgraded
through this proposal.
9. With regard to the response provided to Residential Infill criterion #6, as stated previously there
is actually less open space with the development proposal than what presently exists. Further, the
response does not set forth how the design of the site creates a form and function enhancing the
community character of the immediate vicinity.
10. With regard to the response provided to Residential Infill criterion #7, as the development
proposed will actually result in less open space on the parcel, provide a revised response that sets
forth the actual benefits to the community character being provided in order to justify the
requested setback reductions.
It . Pursuant to Section 2-204.C.3., off-street parking spaces are to be screened by a wall or fence of
at least three feet (3') in height and landscaped on the exterior side by a continuous hedge. The
development proposal has not provided for either the wall or fence as required.
12. Pursuant to Section 3-911, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed
underground.
13. Pursuant to Section 3-1204.D., all landscaping must be protected from vehicular/pedestrian
traffic by the installation of curbing and wheelstops.
14. Pursuant to Section 3-1701, sidewalks are required to be provided along the South Hillcrest
Avenue and Rogers Street rights-of-way.
15. As per its definition, height is measured from the mean elevation of the existing grade to the
highest finished roof surface of a flat roof. The submitted architectural elevations have derived
height from finished floor.
16. The handicap accessible parking is not in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA). Only one (1) handicap accessible parking space is proposed on the plans (despite what is
indicated on the site data table) and this parking space has niether the adequate width of twelve
feet (12') or the required five foot (5') wide access panel.-
17 . The parking space depicted at the west end of the parking tier abutting the south side of the
building does not currently meet the dimensional standards of Section 3-1402.A. and this.
nonconformity will be exacerbated through the redesign of the space and abutting drive aisle.
This space must be redesigned to meet the aforementioned dimensional standards.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 2, 2006 - Page 23
9 0
18. A section of the existing concrete walkway along the south side of the building is not depicted on
the site plan. If this section of pavement is proposed to be removed, then depict it as such.
19. The 11.88' x 34.56' paved area labeled as "1 parking space" at the north side of the site is more
likely intended as a loading space than a parking space. Relabel it as such and adjust the parking
calculations on the site data table accordingly. The use of the area as loading will also enable the
property to comply with the requirements of Section 3-1406.
20. The minimum dimension for a standard perpendicular parking space is 18' not 19' (this was a
recent change to our Code). As such, modify the newly proposed parking spaces and incorporate
the excess paved areas into the adjacent landscape areas.
21 . A notation appears to have partially been made for the stop bar/sign at the ingress/egress point
along South Hilicrest Avenue for the new parking area.
22. There appear to be numerous relics from the conversion of the survey to the site plan, which are
unnecessary and ultimately lead to confusion on the site plan. Remove these unncessary relics.
23. Clarify the intent of the line passing through the existing dumpster.
24. Provide a Unity of Title for the parcels prior to the issuance of a building permit.
25. As the existing drive aisle along the south side of the building is one-way westbound, provide
"Do Not Enter" signage at the existing egress point on South Hillcrest Avenue and where the
proposed north/south two-way drive aisle intersects this one-way drive aisle.
26. Is lighting proposed to be provided for the parking lot? If so, provide the locations of light
fixtures/poles on the site and landscape plans, and provide a detail or cut sheet of the fixture/pole.
Any/all lighting must comply with the requirements of Section 3-1302.
27. What measures are being taken to prevent glare from the headlights of vehicles from impacting
the adjacent properties (including those properties across Rogers Street)?
28. The existing parking spaces along the south side of the building are being modified from thier
current design. As such, indicate how these spaces comply with the dimensional standards of
Section 3-1402.
29. The existing parking spaces at the southeast comer of the office parcel does not conform to
design standards as per Section 3-1402.A. As substantial paved areas of the site are already
being cut, it would seem appropriate that this nonconforming parking space be removed and
replaced with landscaping at this time.
30. Where is the mechanical equipment for the proposed building addition being accommodated?
31 . The reduced landscape plans provided are not consistent with the full-size landscape plans.
32. The full-size architectural elevations do not contain the note pertaining to the materials and colors
of the addition being consistent with the existing building. Provide revised full-size architectural
elevations.
33. Pursuant to Section 3-904.A., at street and driveway intersections, no structure or landscaping
may be installed that will obstruct views at a level between 30" above grade and eight feet (8')
above grade.
Sight visibility triangles are measured as follows: where a drive aisle intersects a right-of-way and
where two rights-of-way intersect, the sight visibility triangle is measured a distance of 20' along
each axis from the point of intersection.
34.. The plans submitted previously with this application depicted the proposed building addition
extending only to the north side of the one-way drive aisle and having a setback of approximately
23', which exceeded the minimum requirement of Code. The revised plans submitted on
February 3, 2006, now depict the proposed addition extending across the one-way drive aisle and
having setback of ten feet (10'). The proposed ten foot (10') setback does not meet minimum
standard code; therefore a seperate Flexible Standard Application must be submitted for this
setback deviation. This application will be processed concurrently with the existing application
and will also be subject to approval by the Community Development Board (CDB).
35 . With the extension of the building over the one-way drive aisle, clarify how solid waste vehicles
will achieve egress from the site. Backing out into the Court Street right-of-way is not
acceptable.
Other:
No Comments
Notes: This application has been deemed insufficient to proceed before the Community Development Board (CDB). Please submit
revised plans and application package (as necessary) on or before Noon, March 29, 2006, for review by the DRC on May 4, 2006.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 2, 2006 - Page 24
•
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
•
r'
0 ,
y ?arwa er
LL
0
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET'
Date: February 28, 2006
To: Douglas Birch, LBR Holdings, III, LLC, (727) 441-1499
From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
Re: FLD2005-11114 - 1401 Court Street
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 7
Comments: Please find attached the Development Review Committee (DRC) comments for the
development proposal for 1401 Court Street (FLD2005-11114).
As you are aware, the DRC will discuss this development proposal at its meeting of
Thursday, March 2, 2006, at approximately 11:30am.
** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.teffta,myclearwater.com **
** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com **
• •
Feb. 28 2006 09:03AM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94411499 Feb.28 09:00AM 02'53 SND 07 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329).
0
•
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICF. Box 4748, CI.FARWATER, Fi.oRIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL. SFRVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI.F. AVENUE, CLEAMATF.R, FLORIDA 33756
TF.I.rPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT RFVIF.W
February 6, 2006
Mr. Douglas Birch
LBR Holdings, III, LLC
1401 Court Street
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: FLD2005-11114 - 1401 Court Street - Letter of Completeness
Dear Mr. Birch:
The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number FLD2005-11114. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that
the application is complete.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, March 2,
2006, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's
Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be
reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may
have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865
E-Mail: robert.tefft@mlclearwater.com.
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next DRCICourt St 1401 LBR (O) - 03-02-06(R 7) 1 Court St 1401 -Letter of
Completeness 02-06-06doc
FRANK I111MARD, MAYOR
Hu.I. JONSON, VICE: MAYOR JOHN D01b\N, Cot
Horr Hr\h111:fON, COILNCILMI{MItIiR ® CAIt1.IiN A. PI:rrILSFn, COUncu MEMBER
"I,QUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AI?FIRMAT[VI? Ac ION EMPLOYER
•
•
CITY OF CLEARWATER LL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U
TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
Date: February 6, 2006
To: Douglas Birch, LBR Holdin III, LLC, (727) 441-1499
From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
Re: FLD2005-11114 / 1401 Court Street
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2
Comments:
"Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefftcrnvcleanvatei-.coni **
** Visit the Planning Department online at www.niycleat-water.coni **
Feb. 06 2006 09:40AM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94411499 Feb.06 09:39AM 01'05 SND 02 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #84.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-73291.
0
CITY OF C LEARWATE R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
January 30, 2006
Mr. Douglas Birch
LBR Holdings, III, LLC
1401 Court Street
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: FLD2005-11114 -1401 Court Street - Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Mr. Birch:
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case
number FLD2005-11114. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the
application is incomplete with the following comments:
DI Pursuant to Section G of the application, a site plan is to be provided which includes the following:
Aall dimensions (dimensions of proposed building addition, existing drive aisles, etc);
b engineering bar scale (the scale provided on the plans is incorrect);
?4e?f all required setbacks; and
all required site triangles.
01130106: A site plan has not been included in the resubmittal.
C2
Pursuant to Section H of the application, the landscape plan shall include the following:
(a delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
(b,) sight visibility triangles;
L(cj?delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscape islands and curbing;
0I existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including
driplines;
Ce(Pplant schedule with a key indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and
proposed landscape materials;
.,0f typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and groundcovers including instructions, soil mixes,
backfilling, mulching and protective measures;
,,einterior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labled and interior landscape coverage, expressing
in both square feet and percentage covered; and
irrigation notes.
01130106: A landscape plan has. not been included in the resubmittal.
0 Pursuant to Section H of the application, submit a reduced (8 1/2" x 11 ") landscape plan.
r 01/30/06: A reduced landscape plan was submitted, however without the submittal of a full-size
landscape plan which can be reviewed as to being complete, this item will remain as "Not Met".J,g7 fr '?/ ? FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR
BILL JONSON VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN COUNCIIrMEMBER
G?jl Zrr'
f (,?,L HOYr HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PF.TERSEN, COUNCB.bIEMBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENI' AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
• •
Pursuant to Section I of the application, building elevation drawings are required as part of a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Application. The elevations shall include all sides of the existing/proposed building
including height dimensions, colors and materials.
01130106: While building height dimensions have been provided as per the previous condition, colors and
materials have not been included on the architectural elevations.
Pursuant to Section I of the application, submit reductions (8 1/2" x 11 ") of the building elevation drawings.
01130106: Reduced archtectural elevations were not provided with the resubmittal.
6. Provide a roof plan for the building.
01130106: A roof plan was not provided with the resubmittal.
(7. Please be advised that, while not an application completeness issue, the landscape plan is inconsistent with
the landscape requirements of Section 3-1202. It is suggested that a revised landscape plan that is consistent
with the requirements of code is resubmitted.
Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the
deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be
taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit
revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Monday, February 6,
2006. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865
E-Mail: robert.teffL@myclearwater.com
U
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
L?
Clearwater
U
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
Date: January 30, 2006
To: Douglas Birch, LBR Holdings, III, LLC, (727) 441-1499
From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
Re: FLD2005-11114 / 1401 Court Street
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3
Comments:
** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.te teCLt@mvc1eqnvqter. coat
** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mycleanvater.com **
0 •
Jan. 30 2006 12:32PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94411499 Jan.30 12:31PM 01'23 SND 03 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-EI-P-FAX C435-7329).
J,,ON-24-2006 10:47 AM SCIENTIST.AND.ENGINEERS 27 738 9505
s ? •
CTENTISTS AND EN OMERC- Inc.
Consulting for lr&astru=re and the Environment
"Professional Site Engineering and Building Design "
1280 HFr ngR RMOE BOULEVARD vosm: (727) 738-9025
DUNEDIN, FInRMA 34698 &-MAIL: pe i4ar@tampabeyir.c= FAX: (727) 7389505
Fag Cover Sheet
Name:
Organization:
Fax: 5 4 e65' Phone: -15-3
From:
Date:
Subject:
Priority:
Comments:
Pages including this transmittal
P.01
',,JANv--24-2006 10:47 AM SCI ENT I ST . AND .ENGINEERS 27 738 9505
0 •
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS (attachment)
This project consists of an addition to the second floor office space and additional
Parking for the existing office building. The building, proposed addition and existing
parking are located in a general office zone, The proposed perking addition is located
as a permitted use in a low-medium density residential zone. The Property is "triple
frontage" with public streets on three sides. All other sides are classified as "side
yards."
P.02
Project Variances under the flexible development standards.
W o (?•tt?tZ_
Code FW- Requested Requested
Building Setbacks
Front 25
lid 15-35 25 north 6w ev- ''tacz??)
27 west Gan, E. SAP '
Side 20 10-20 -Weast -W C-,c,6Leo?>
22 south
Height 30 30-80 X30 is
Existing Parking Lot
Front 4.32 west
4.17 north
-Side 4.81 sou
3.38 east
Proposed Parking Lot Add ition
Front 25 10-25 10 south
15 west
Side to 5- lio 5 east
General Requirements
Code Proposed
Parking spaces 3/1000 3.911000 (39 std, 2 hcpt)
9043511000x3 = 31 41x1000/10435 = 3.92
Lot area 10000 (35 00 FDS) 29498
Lot width 100 ( 50 FDS) 182
Lot coverage (IAR) 0,75 0.69
Floor area ratio (FAR) 0.$0 0,35
0
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
December 2, 2005
Mr. Douglas Birch
LBR Holdings, III, LLC
1401 Court Street
Clearwater, FL 33756
•
CITY OF C LEARWATE R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576
Re: FLD2005-11114 -1401 Court Street - Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Mr. Birch:
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case
number FLD2005-11114. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the
application is incomplete with the following comments:
1. The application lists only one (1) parcel number; however the subject property consists of two seperate
parcels. Submit a revised application that includes all parcels involved in the development proposal.
2. Pursuant to Section B of the application, the proposed uses and sizes are to be identified. Neither the
proposed use of the building/expansion is identified, nor the square footage of the expansion. Submit a
revised application.
3. Pursuant to Section B of the application, the description of the request is to be specific and identify all
requested code deviations. The statement "Addition to second story of office building and the associated
parking" is not an acceptable description of request.
4. Pursuant to Section C of the application, submit a copy of the title insurance policy, deed to the property, or
sign the affadavit attesting ownership. The affadavit was not completed and the only deed submitted was for
Lot 11. Provide documentation per the above attesting to ownership of Lots 8, 9, and 10, Block E, Breeze
Hill.
5. While responses have been provided in regards to the six (6) General Applicability Criteria, the responses
do not explain how each criterion is being achieved as required by the application.
6. Pursuant to Section G of the application, a site plan is to be provided which includes the following:
(a) Engineering bar scale (the scale provided on the plans is incorrect);
(b) All required setbacks; and
(c) All required site triangles.
BRIAN J. AUNGS'C, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYI- HANMILTON, COUN'CIL;\SEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMENIBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
• •
7. Pursuant to Section G of the application, the site data table shall include the following:
(a) Total number of required parking spaces; and
(b) Impermeable Surface Ratio (LS.R.).
Pursuant to Section H of the application, the landscape plan shall include the following:
(a) Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
(b) Sight visibility triangles;
(c) Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscape islands and curbing;
(d) Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including
driplines;
(e) Plant schedule with a key indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing
and proposed landscape materials;
(f) Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and groundcovers including instructions, soil mixes,
backfilling, mulching and protective measures;
(g) Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labled and interior landscape coverage,
expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; and
(h) Irrigation notes.
9. Pursuant to Section H of the application, submit a reduced (8 1/2" x 11 ") landscape plan.
10. Please be advised that, while not an application completeness issue, the landscape plan is inconsistent with
the landscape requirements of Section 3-1202. It is suggested that a revised landscape plan that is consistent
with the requirements of code is resubmitted.
Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the
deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be
taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit
revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Thursday, December 8,
2005.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at
robert.tefftglnyclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
Planning Department
City of Clearwater
Tel: (727) 562-4539
Fax: (727) 562-4865
CITY OF CLEARWATER LL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
December 2, 2005
Douglas Birch, LBR Holdings, III, LLC, (727) 441-1499
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
FLD2005-11114 - 1401 Court Street
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3
Comments: Mr. Birch, please find attached a revised letter of incompleteness for the above
referenced project. Please disregard the letter previously faxed to your attention earlier
today.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
"Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.teflicL?myclearwater.com **
** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearwater.com **
0
Dec. 02 2005 01:59PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94411499 Dec.02 01:57PM 01'26 SND 03 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MB4U' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
• •
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
December 2, 2005.
Mr. Douglas Birch
LBR Holdings, III, LLC
1401 Court Street
Clearwater, FL 33756
CITY OF C LEARWAT E R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576
Re: FLD2005-11114 -1401 Court Street - Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Mr. Birch:
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case
number FLD2005-1 1 1 14. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the
application is incomplete with the following comments:
1. A Flexible Development Application for a Residential Infill Project was submitted for the processing of
your development proposal. However, within the Office (O) District, there are no provisions for a
Residential Infill Project; thus the wrong application has been submitted. Based upon the development
proposal, it would appear that the correct application to be submitted is the Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Application.
2. The application lists only one (1) parcel number; however the subject property consists of two seperate
parcels. Submit a revised application that includes all parcels involved in the development proposal.
3. Pursuant to Section B of the application, the proposed uses and sizes are to be identified. Neither the
proposed use of the building/expansion is identified, nor the square footage of the expansion. Submit a
revised application.
4. Pursuant to Section B of the application, the description of the request is to be specific and identify all
requested code deviations. The statement "Addition to second story of office building and the associated
parking" is not an acceptable description of request.
5. Pursuant to Section C of the application, submit a copy of the title insurance policy, deed to the property, or
sign the affadavit attesting ownership. The affadavit was not completed and the only deed submitted was for
Lot 11. Provide documentation per the above attesting to ownership of Lots 8, 9, and 10, Block E, Breeze
Hill.
6. While responses have been provided in regards to the six (6) General Applicability Criteria, the responces
do not explain HOW each criterion is being achieved as required by the application.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR FIOYI' HAMILTON, COUNCIIMEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILbIEMRER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENTAND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
Letter of Incompleteness
1401 Court Street - FLD2005-11114
7. Pursuant to Section G of the application, a site plan is to be provided which includes the following:
(a) All dimensions (dimensions of proposed building addition, existing drive aisles, etc);
(b) Engineering bar scale (the scale provided on the plans is incorrect);
(c) All required setbacks; and
(d) All required site triangles.
8. Pursuant to Section G of the application, the site data table shall include the following:
(a) Total number of required parking spaces;
(b) Building and structure heights; and
(c) Impermeable Surface Ratio (I.S.R.).
9. Pursuant to Section H of the application, the landscape plan shall include the following:
(a) Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
(b) Sight visibility triangles;
(c) Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscape islands and curbing;
(d) Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including
driplines;
(e) Plant schedule with a key indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing
. and proposed landscape materials;
(f) Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and groundcovers including instructions, soil mixes,
backfilling, mulching and protective measures;
(g) Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labled and interior landscape coverage,
expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; and
(h) Irrigation notes.
10. Pursuant to Section H of the application, submit a reduced (8 1/2" x 11 ") landscape plan.
11. Pursuant to Section I of the application, building elevation drawings are required as part of a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Application. The elevations shall include all sides of the existing/proposed building
including height dimensions, colors and materials.
12. Pursuant to Section I of the application, submit reduced (8 1/2" x 11") reductions of the building elevation
drawings.
13. Provide a floor plan for the proposed addition.
14. Provide a roof plan for the building.
15. Please be advised that, while not an application completeness issue, the landscape plan is inconsistent with
the landscape requirements of Section 3-1202. It is suggested that a revised landscape plan that is consistent
with the requirements of code is resubmitted.
Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the
deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be
taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit
revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Thursday, December 8,
2005.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at
rob ert.tefft(a,myclearwater. com.
Letter of Incompleteness
1401 Court Street - FLD2005-11114
Sincerely yours,
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
Planning Department
City of Clearwater
Tel: (727) 562-4539
Fax: (727) 562-4865
•
E
CITY OF CLEARWATER LL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater
'
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~_
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U
TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
December 2, 2005
Douglas Birch, LBR Holdings III, LLC, (727) 441-1499
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
FLD2005-11114 / 1401 Court Street
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 4
Comments:
** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefftamyclearwater.conr **
** Visit the Planning Department online at www.ntvclearwater.com **
9 0
Dec. 02 2005 10:43AM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94411499 Dec.02 10:41AM 01'38 SND 04 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX P0AgNTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEB CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
CDB Meeting Date: August 15, 2006
Case Number: FLD2005-11114
Agenda Item: D. 2.
Owner/Applicant: Douglas Birch, LBR Holdings, III, LLC.
Addresses: 1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development Application to reduce the south (rear) setback
from 20 feet to 10 feet within the Office (O) District, pursuant to Section
2-1003.17 of the Community Development Code; and to allow non-
residential off-street parking within the Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District with deviations to the south (front) setback
from 25 feet to 10 feet and west (front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet;
and to allow the encroachment.of a drive aisle within the required sight
visibility triangles along South Hillcrest Avenue as a Residential Infill
Project, pursuant to Sections 2-204.C and E of the Community
Development Code.
CURRENT ZONING: Office (O) District; and
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District.
CURRENT FUTURE LAND Residential/Office General (R/OG); and
USE CATEGORY: Residential Urban (RU).
PROPERTY USE: Current Uses: Office and Vacant (Formerly Detached Dwelling).
Proposed Uses: Office and Non-Residential Off-Street Parking.
EXISTING North: Office (O) Offices.
SURROUNDING ZONING South: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Detached Dwellings.
AND USES: East: Office (O); and Offices; and
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Detached Dwellings.
West: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) City Park.
UPDATE:
This item was originally scheduled for the Community Development Board (CDB) meeting of June 20,
2006. However, prior to this date the applicant requested the item be continued to the Boards meeting of
July 18, 2006. Two citizens expressed concern that the item could be continued again (from the meeting
of July 18, 2006) and stated that they had gone through significant effort to be present. The citizens
requested that if the item were to be continued, that it be continued until the Boards meeting of August
15, 2006.
The Board discussed the issues raised by the citizens and recommended that the continuance include a
condition requiring the applicant to contact the concerned citizens regarding their concerns.
Subsequently, the Board approved a continuance to August 15, 2006, with the aforementioned condition.
Community Development Board - August 15, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 1
0 •
The applicant has had discussions with those concerned citizens as required by the Board; however no
consensus was reached in regard to the development proposal.
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The subject properties, which total approximately 0.681 acres, are located on the east side of South
Hillcrest Avenue, between Court and Rogers Streets. The northernmost property is within the Office (O)
District and consists of a two-story office building with accessory surface parking. The southernmost
property is within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and is presently vacant;
however the parcel previously consisted of a single-family detached dwelling. The surrounding area
consists of offices and single-family detached dwellings, as well as a City Park that is presently under
construction.
Development Proposal:
The development proposal is twofold. The first part involves a parcel of land located within the Office
(O) District and consists of the following improvements:
? Construction of a second story addition to an existing office building;
? A partial reconfiguration of an existing surface parking lot;
? Closure of an existing curb cut along South Hillcrest Avenue; and
? Elimination of an existing refuse enclosure at the southeast corner of the parcel.
The second part involves and abutting parcel of land located within the Low Medium Density Residential
(LMDR) District and consists of the following improvements:
? Construction of a non-residential off-street parking lot;
? Construction of a refuse enclosure at the south end of the parcel;
? Construction of a three-foot high screen wall; and
? Installation of associated landscaping.
Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.): Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, the maximum allowable
F.A.R. for properties with a designation of Residential/Office General is 0.5. As such, the maximum
development potential of the 0.506-acre northernmost parcel is 11,020.68 square feet. With the
construction of the proposed addition, the building will be 10,553 square feet in size, which results in an
F.A.R. of 0.47. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Countywide
Future Land Use Plan with regard to the maximum allowable F.A.R.
Building Height: Pursuant to Section 2-1002 of the Community Development Code, the maximum
allowable height for an office use within the Office (O) District is 30 feet. The height of the existing
office building measures approximately 24 feet to the roof deck and the proposed addition will be
constructed to match this existing height. Therefore, based upon the above, the development proposal is
consistent with the requirements of Section 2-1002 of the Community Development Code.
Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-1002 of the Community Development Code, parking is
required to be provided at a rate of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for office uses.
Based upon the above, the proposed 10,553 square foot office requires 32 parking spaces. As proposed,
a total of 34 parking spaces will be provided; thus the development proposal exceeds its parking
requirement.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-20LD.1 of the Community Development Code, all outside
mechanical equipment shall be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting
properties. A sight line study has been provided with regard to the visibility of the proposed mechanical
Community Development Board - August 15, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 2
equipment from the Rogers Street right-of-way, and said study depicts that the mechanical equipment
will not be visible from the right-of-way; however the issue of visibility remains with regard to the South
Hillcrest Avenue right-of-way. As such, it is attached as a condition of approval that a sight line study
indicating the mechanical equipment will not be visible from the South Hillcrest Avenue right-of-way
must be provided prior to the issuance of a Development Order, or that the plans must be revised to
include the screening of the proposed mechanical equipment. In the event that the proposed mechanical
equipment will be visible from the South Hillcrest Avenue right-of-way or any other adjacent right-of-
way or property, adequate screening of the equipment will be required prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, to
minimize hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structures or landscaping may be installed which
will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot
sight visibility triangles. The north/south drive aisle within the proposed non-residential off-street
parking lot will encroach upon the required sight visibility triangles on the north and south sides of the
driveway connecting this drive aisle to the adjacent South Hillcrest Avenue.
The intent of the sight visibility triangles is to enable those vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing a right-
of-way and those vehicles stopped at a stop bar while leaving a site to have a clear and unobstructed view
of one another. The proposed encroachment of the drive aisle upon the sight visibility triangles will not
result in a conflict with this intent as the vehicles within the encroaching drive aisle will be the very thing
those vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing the right-of-way are attempting to see. Further, those
vehicles stopped at the stop bar while leaving the site will not have their clear and unobstructed view of
vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing the right-of-way impacted by any vehicle within the drive aisle as
such vehicle would be located to the rear of the vehicle leaving the site.
Granting the requested encroachment upon the sight visibility triangles will not result in the grant of a
special privilege as similar reductions have been approved elsewhere under similar circumstances. It is
noted that the City's Engineering Department has indicated support for this request. Based upon the
above, positive findings can be made with respect to allowing encroachments within the sight visibility
triangles as set forth in Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code.
Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not
involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground
unless such undergrounding is not practicable. It is attached as a condition of approval that all on-site
utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are placed underground as part of the
redevelopment of the site and that a notation to this effect is provided on the site plan prior to the
issuance of any building permits.
Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, a twelve foot (12)
wide landscape buffer consisting of one (1) tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage is required along the
eastern perimeter of the parcel consisting of the proposed non-residential off-street parking lot. As
proposed, the landscape plan includes a ten-foot (10') wide buffer along the eastern perimeter and does
not provide for 100% shrub coverage.
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development
Code, the landscaping "requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the
application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table
depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria:
Community Development Board - August 15, 2006
FLD2005-11114 - Page 3
•
0
Consistent I Inconsistent
1. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A
part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed
on the parcel proposed for development; or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X
proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic
corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in
which the parcel oronosed for development is located.
As expressed above, the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent
with all applicable criteria. Specifically, the proposed landscaping along the perimeters of the proposed
non-residential off-street parking lot retains numerous existing mature trees and proposes to plant
additional trees in excess of the minimum requirements. Further, ample groundcovers/shrubs are
proposed along these perimeters consistent with the requirements of Code. As noted previously, 100%
shrub coverage along the eastern perimeter is not proposed, this is due to two issues: the root systems of
the existing trees make it difficult if not impossible to fully plant the buffer area; and the need to provide
maintenance access to those plantings that can be provided. However, there are some locations along this
buffer area that are not impacted by the existing root systems and would not compromise maintenance
access that could be provided with additional groundcovers/shrubs, specifically along the eastern fagade
of the proposed screen wall. The provision of groundcovers/shrubs in these locations is attached as a
condition of approval to be addressed prior to the issuance of a Development Order. Based upon the
above and subject to the attached condition being addressed, positive findings can be made with regard to
the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program.
It is noted that pursuant to Section 4-1102.A.8 of the Community Development Code, the landscape plan
shall include the location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing landscape
materials. Previous versions of the proposed landscape plan included this information; however the most
recent submittal does not. It has been attached as a condition of approval that a revised landscape plan
including this information must be provided prior to the issuance of a Development Order.
It is further noted that the development proposal will create areas of excess pavement that could be cut
out to provide additional landscape buffer to the adjacent single-family detached dwellings and along
South Hillcrest Avenue. These areas specifically exist as follows: along the south side of the one-way
drive aisle lying east of the angled parking; and adjacent to the westernmost angled parking space. It is
attached as a condition of approval that a revised landscape plan eliminating these areas of excess
pavement must be provided prior to the issuance of a Development Order.
Solid Waste: The development proposal includes the elimination of the existing refuse enclosure located
on the northernmost parcel within the subject property and the construction of a new 12-foot by 10-foot
Community Development Board - August 15, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 4
• •
refuse enclosure at the south end of the southernmost parcel. The proposed solid waste facility has been
found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Sig age: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. Any
future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the
subject property.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency
of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-204 and 2-1003 of the
Community Development Code:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
F.A.R. 0.5 0.47 X
Height 30 feet 24 feet X
Setbacks Front: 25 feet (North) 25 feet X
(O) (West) 27.2 feet X
Side: 10 feet (South) 10 feet X
(East) 3 - 5 feet X1
Setbacks Front: 10 - 25 feet (South) 10 feet X
(LMDR) (West) 10 feet X
Side: 0 - 5 feet (East) 12 feet X
Parking Spaces Offices - 3.0 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA 34 parking spaces X
(32 spaces)
1 See above discussion with regard to Setbacks for further information.
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of
the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-204.C of the Community
Development Code (Non-Residential Off-Street Parking):
Consistent I Inconsistent
1. The parcel proposed for development is contiguous to the parcel on which the non- X
residential use will be served by the off-street parking spaces is located and has a
common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for development is
located immediately across a public road from the non-residential use which will be
served by the off-street parking spaces, provided that access to the off-street parking
does not involve the use of local streets which have residential units on both sides of
the street.
2. No off-street parking spaces are located in the required front setback for detached X
dwellings in the LMDR District or within ten feet, whichever is greater, or within
ten feet of a side or rear lot line, except along the common boundary of the parcel
proposed for development and the parcel on which the non-residential use which
will be served by the off-street parking spaces.
3. Off-street parking spaces are screened by a wall or fence of at least three feet in X'
height, which is landscaped on the external side with a continuous hedge or non-
deciduous vine.
4. All outdoor lighting is automatically switched to turn off at 9:00 pm. X
5. All narkine spaces shall be surface parking.' X
While the required three-foot high wall has been provided in accordance with these provisions, it is noted that a detail (i.e. elevation) of
this wall clarifying its intended appearance has not been provided. The provision of this detail prior to the issuance of a Development
Order has been attached as a condition of approval.
Community Development Board - August 15, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 5
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as
per Section 2-204.E of the Community Development Code (Residential Infill Projects):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following:
intensity or other development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access X
or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character
and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole..
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as
per Section 2-1003.F of the Community Development Code (Offices):
Consistent I Inconsistent
1. Height:
a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in N/A N/A
excess of the minimum required or improved design and appearance;
b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from N/A N/A
any adjacent residential property.
2. No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more N/A N/A
than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for
development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign
program.
3. Off-street parking: The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that N/A N/A
the likely use of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than
otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used
for storage or other non-narking demand generating purposes.
Community Development Board - August 15, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 6
9 •
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level
Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adiacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its
meeting of May 4, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the
Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of
law:
Findings of Fact:
1. That the subject properties total approximately 0.681 acres and are located on the east side of South
Hillcrest Avenue, between Court and Rogers Streets;
2. That the northernmost property is located within the Office (O) District and the Residential/Office
General (R/OG) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. That the southernmost property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category;
4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts; and
5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law:
1. That the encroachment of the north/south drive aisle upon the sight visibility triangles along South
Hillcrest Avenue will not result in the grant of a special privilege as similar reductions have been
approved elsewhere under similar circumstances;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-204
and 2-1003 of the Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-204.C., 2-
204.E. and 2-1003.F. of the Community Development Code;
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as
per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and
5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as
per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development
Application to reduce the south (rear) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet within the Office (O) District,
pursuant to Section 2-1003.17 of the Community Development Code; and to allow non-residential off-
Community Development Board - August 15, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 7
street parking within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with deviations to the south
(front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and west (front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet; and to allow the
encroachment of a drive aisle within the required sight visibility triangles along South Hillcrest Avenue
as a Residential Infill Project, pursuant to Sections 2-204.C and E of the Community Development Code
with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the plans must be revised to include a detail (i.e.
elevation) of the three-foot high buffer wall with adequate information as to its appearance;
2. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the landscape plan must be revised to provide
additional groundcovers/shrubs adjacent to the east fagade of the screen wall where not impacted by
the existing root systems and not compromising maintenance access;
3. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the landscape plan must be revised to include the
location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing landscape materials;
4. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the areas of excess pavement along the south side
of the one-way drive aisle lying east of the angled parking, and adjacent to the westernmost angled
parking space must be eliminated and incorporated into the adjacent landscape areas;
5. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, a sight line study must be provided indicating the
mechanical equipment will not be visible from the South Hillcrest Avenue right-of-way, or that the
plans must be revised to include the adequate screening of the mechanical equipment;
6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Fire Department conditions must be addressed;
7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a tree preservation plan prepared by a certified
arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture must
be provided. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities
impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address
these impacts (i.e. crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems). Other data required
on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or
in the root prune lines if required), the tree barricade detail, and any other pertinent information
relating to tree preservation;
8. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, evidence of filing a Unity of Title with Pinellas
County between all parcels involved in the application (14-29-15-10854-005-0080 and 14-29-15-
10854-005-0110) must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department;
9. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a notation must be provided on the site plan
stating that all existing and proposed on-site utility facilities will be placed underground;
10. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from
F.D.O.T. for work in the Court Street/S.R. 60 right-of-way must be provided;
11. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit must be
provided;
12. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the storm vault must be revised such that storm
water volume is stored in a vault or enlarged pipe system but not in the voids of a gravel bed. As the
vault has no positive outfall it is to be designed for a 50-year storm event with a 1-hour time of
concentration. The high water level in the vault is to designed to provide 6" of freeboard;
13. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be
existing or proposed, must be placed underground;
14. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any required Transportation Impact Fees
must be paid;
15. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all utility equipment, including but not
limited to electrical and water meters, must be screened from view and/or painted to match the
building to which they are attached, as applicable;
Community Development Board - August 15, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 8
•
16. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, adequate screening of the mechanical
equipment must be provided in the event that said mechanical equipment is visible from any adjacent
right-of-way or property;
17. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff,
18. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water
capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall
be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants
are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in
accordance with Fire Department requirements;
19.. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the
construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the
building to which they are attached, as applicable;
20. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated
with the design of the building with regard- to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final
sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes:
(a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font
style and size; and
(b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the
colors, materials and architectural style of the building;
21. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development
Board approval (by August 15, 2007); and
22. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first
building permit.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff.
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:
? Application
? Location Map
? Aerial Map
? Future Land Use Map
? Zoning Map
? Existing Surrounding Uses Map
? Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S:Wlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBICourt Street 1401 LBR (O and LMDR)-08-15-06(RT) ICourt
St 1401- Staff Report 08-15-06.doc
Community Development Board - August 15, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 9
0 0
Robert G. Tefft
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727) 562-4539
robert.tefft(n-)myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Planner III
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
• Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports.
Senior Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as,
but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text
amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports.
Make presentations to various City Boards.
Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications. such as,
but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its
display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the
Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance.
Assistant Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida
Performed technical review of and prepared staff
Performed reviews of building permit applications
ordinances, land development regulations, codes,
professionals and the public.
October 1999 to March 2001
f reports for site plan development applications.
Provided information on land use applications,
and related planning programs/services to other
EDUCATION
• Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999
LICENSES & CERTIFICATES
• American Planning Association
Community Development Board - August 15, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 10
t t e - r
?? NAPLE ELORIDGE ST ,ll RO
ST FtWt?
.M.1PL F. ST
ST
Q CASLE [
S
=-?UH > C?¢ ¢? :AAJ•IdOA R'CGEWOOD a
`
1.1"CN FORM RD ? ?
ST
RD a P:NEwooo RIDGEWOOD ST RI
? 4 aR
J QO G ? ?? )> -j ? p u'7
3 '??' P ?? oAhNO? 3 w amD G $
a 3
? T. CRESNEW ` ST Z IG }a
S T. E. WCOO O
7
qy...;r? ?4? ?a 4 Q? ? ? GROVE ST
T
_ D GROYE El ?
? 0
o ???m ?
?Qo El
o?? o?o
Sr
Q ¢?> I ( _7 4? ? QEYED w
? ILJ uuu...
S- O ? ?Q PARR S'
"'"'° s!
ST PERK ST
` PROJECT 5 - N
DARTM XI , 5
SITE =
sT
0-163
<
Ont DE LEON ST
GOUiO Si
O ?A ROSA SA?
(??/?BC\L
D
G?
?
\
COURT ST SA 60 T ST S.R 651 GULF TO RAY q M
O ST
< OGERS S! ? < o
ST
?a0 ?
?
?
?a?
?
? ?
a d
c `
a
"
LJ
F:NE x TURNER ST
cr <A ?? ? R/RNER
?
U .
FINE? PINE ST a MARION ST
o
?
?
?
9
??o
3 ORUa
?
?
s JASMINE WAY N`NAY
? _ ? o ?? A
Y MAGNOLIA OR
LOTUS PATVI
L ST
'i
•'
JE1F1..D
Z JEFFORDS ST ,EFP
?
Si ?CROS ST
? Yj .: }? ? u ?O 39RRY ST BARRY RO ?
6 94 ?
nsca.A s 0 ?' '
TuscGLA RD r..._• ?
ME:ON < ST > ES7E:LE e
ZZ
?? ?
ST a
C 9RCM'N a''(?T7 •..A.,...:
?L; ?
.•
R4'
:'••
(
1
.
.
..
,
?
p
*
ww ••?•: G.R.4R8
.
S° S° ?i w ? •••:! LAKEYIEW RO .'
Location MaP
Owner: LBR Holdings, III, LLC Case: FLD2005-11114
Site: 1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street Property
Size Acres : 0.681
Atlas
Page: 297A
PIN: 14-29-15-10854-005-0080
14-29-15-10854-005-01 10
0
14/03
12.37 Ac
400 403
14
1
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 ^
24 1
405
13 12 11 10 9 6 5 4 3 2
407
Q V'Q ?M ?m N
QQ QP Q? ?? P
RM RM
RIOS W
`Q
y
W
V
J
J
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F8
M C
co
16 15 14 13 12 11 10
B
3 4 5 6
° °
v v v a v v v v
409 P
^ v
^ P
Q P o
^ a
^ vv
14 1 16 17 18 9 20 21 22 23 2 d10
7
O 13
O
? 1 11
O
P 10
^
P 9
N
P
N
P 6
f?7
^ 5
CNj
P 4
N
Q 3 2
V
P
R/OG CO UR TSr
COURTST
a ^?
R/OG V,
V, ??
zz
18685
,0 9 8 R
R 3
V 2 ,
a
11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 .-
O C, ^ b 76N N M
Q P P Q P Q Q
ROGERS ST
P
Q P P P Q Q Q
O O
10 9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
F
F
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 a
O Q W N O O P
r Q P Q R
TURNER ST
^ O
O O ? Q P ? Q P
n r ^
10 9 8 7 6 5 Tj6i
3 1?2 1
2
26
A f
24
Q
0
W
It A 10 G
Z 20
415 21 22 3
CO)
CO)
18 17 16
?a N
V ? P
Q Q P
9 8 7
k
i l
2 13 1
a
10 1 q 1 8 1 71
11 12 1 13 1 14
n
O I? I a I a
10 II 9 118
Future Land Use Plan Map
Owner: LBR Holdings, III, LLC Case: FLD2005-1 1 1 1 4
Site: 1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street Property
Size Acres : 0.681
Atlas
Page: 297A
PIN: 14-29-15-10854-005-0080
14-29-15-10854-005-01 10
400
14103
12.37 Ac
I
OS R
3 4 5 6 7
8 9
h C co
o
M n
r ?
?
?2
T! '- 604
16 111 13 12 11 10
O Or
Q NN
Q N N N
Q MM MM Q ? t?
Q QQ QQ ^ Q Q Q erQ Q? r d' a
403
14 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1
405
3
12
11
10
9
6
5
4
3
2
407 er p
O O
WO
?
QQ
NQ
Q
O
&
N
N M
? N
b 0
N
Q Q ^
Q
QQ
QQ a? a
SAN JUAN CT
" ° °vQ Q Q Q v v vv vv vv v o
409 v
^
^ ^
14 1 16 17 18 9 20 21 22 23 2 1
410
7
,13
P 1 11
?
Q 10
Q
Q 9
Q
R 6
O
Q 5
N
O 4o
? 3 2
p
Q
Q
COURT ST
Q Q ?c? mom'
18685
10 9 8 3 2 1
E 0
11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 .Q-
Qo 0o N
a o
a 16o
v Q o N
e
Q Q v v
ROGERS ST
Q Q Q V
O ch
Q
N
r O
O
Q
Q
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1
F
o
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1/ '
O Q O N fp N l.?
t'1
Q Q Q Q ? r
TURNER ST
? N c7 f? Oi
O Q Q Q Q Q R ? O
? ^ ' r r
9 n
26 #V
A
25
W 5
? 24
'
7
20
415 21 122 3
alb 18 J1716
h
Q Q a
a Q Q
Q
?
10 9 8
0
.QQ. 11 12 13
Q 4
Q
101 1 1 1
11 12 13 1
O
r
Zoning Map
Owner: LBR Holdings, III, LLC Case: FLD2005-11114
Site: 1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street Property
Size Acres : 0.681
Atlas
Page: 297A
PIN: 14-29-15-10854-005-0080
14-29-15-10854-005-0110
• •
"m
12.37 Ac
School
COURTST
COURT ST
40$ ww. PP PP P w w ww P w 2
14 Fil 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1
400 w
T g 26
4 ? ////^!!!!????
405 S 3 12 11 XV NC ed 3 f
h °h° F '^ :Q°^ Q Q Q Q M Q Q ?? W
407 ^ h h P
24
Q
SAN JUAN CT O0
2 1 1
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Q h
h
10 9 8 7
P a
h
P
10 s 7
Di ed
D ell gs
11 12 13 14
Q Q q h
w ? P P
Q yJ
i w a
10 9 8
Owner. LBR Holdings, III, LLC Case: FLD2005-1 1 1 1 4
Site: 1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street Property
Size Acres : 0.681
Atlas
Page: 297A
PIN: 14-29-15-10854-005-0080
14-29-15-10854-005-0110
City Park
Q
w
V
3 4 5 6 7 9
C
h A
w P
?/?If
409 n M
r
411 14 il 1J}
l ?y]
Il 23 2 ?10
7
%13 1 2 11 10 9 ]
es 6 5 4 3 2
f
S O h O
? a
?. 20 P
y 41 21 22
aQ. Ol ices ?Q" Q O
10 s 8 18685
3
2
1
11
12 13 Ike gh d'D p
1Y11 qgs 19 20 w
[
Q
w Cp N
? f tp
P 1 ftV
p
5t
Q
N
h
N
ROGERS ST
O
Q P
ti ?` N
M
Q
P
O O
r r
'° s 6D fac ied [
)we
Win S3 2
F
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 am
S
V Q
r O
Q w
? O
F N
r O
r Q
M
?
TURNER ST
m
P P " ?' h h 604 p Q P76 16 15 Wt l% Dw Ilfh s10 he l
B 10 9 8 5
Loohin_, east from North Hillcrest Avenue along the subject
property's existing one-way drive aisle
•
°. X-,A
Y
}
Looking west ti-om the north property line of the northernmost
segment of the subject property
1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street
FLD2005-11114
Looking northeast from Rogers Street toward adjacent property
with single-family detached dwelling
Looking west along Rogers Street toward adjacent properly
across North Ilillcrest Avenue
subject property's existing building and one-way drive aisle
ism A4
Lok4kin?_ nwi11i?,:ist tioni ttirsoxidm nurnost sevinent of the
subject property toward the existing building
bow
- A
Looking north from subject properh's existing one-?vav drive
aisle toward existing building
0
1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street
FLD2005-11114
Looking west from interior of subject property toward the
southeast corner of the existing building
Looking southwest from interior of subject property toward
existing adjacent single-family detached dwellings
Looking east from interior of subject property toward
neighboring property with office use
r.i '2
Looking south from interior of suhject propert. toward
existing adjacent single-family detached dwellings
CDB Meeting Date: June 20, 2006
Case Number: FLD2005-11114
Agenda Item: E. 2.
Owner/Applicant: Douglas Birch, LBR Holdings, IH, LLC.
Addresses: 1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development Application to reduce the south (rear) setback
from 20 feet to 10 feet within the Office (O) District, pursuant to Section
2-1003.17 of the Community Development Code; and to allow non-
residential off-street parking within the Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District with deviations to the south (front) setback
from 25 feet to 10 feet and west (front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet;
and to allow the encroachment of a drive aisle within the required sight
visibility triangles along South Hillcrest Avenue as a Residential Infill
Project, pursuant to Sections 2-204.C and E of the Community
Development- Code.
CURRENT ZONING: Office (O) District; and
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District.
CURRENT FUTURE LAND Residential/Office General (R/OG); and
USE CATEGORY: Residential Urban (RU).
PROPERTY USE: Current Uses: Office and Vacant (Formerly Detached Dwelling).
Proposed Uses: Office and Non-Residential Off-Street Parking.
EXISTING North: Office (O) Offices.
SURROUNDING ZONING South: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Detached Dwellings.
AND USES: East: Office (O); and Offices; and
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Detached Dwellings.
West: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) City Park.
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-11114 -Page 1
• •
UPDATE:
The applicant has requested that the development proposal be postponed from the Community
Development Board (CDB) meeting of June 20, 2006 unit the meeting of July 18, 2006. Please find
attached the letter of request (via email) from the applicant.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff'.
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:
? Letter of Request; and
? Resume
S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Wending cases )Up for the next CDBICourt Street 1401 LBR (O) - 06-20-06(M)ICourt St 1401 -
StaffReport 06-20-06 - Continuance.doc
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 2
•
Robert G. Tefft
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727) 562-4539
robert. tefWm yclearwater. com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Planner III
•
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports.
• Senior Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as,
but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text
amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports.
Make presentations to various City Boards.
• Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as,
but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its
display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the
Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance.
• Assistant Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications.
Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications,
ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related, planning programs/services to other
professionals and the public.
EDUCATION
• Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999
LICENSES & CERTIFICATES
• American Planning Association
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 3
• 0
Tefft, Robert
From: Doug Birch [DBirch@lbrllc.com)
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 11:49 AM
To: Tefft, Robert
Please accept this email as a request for a continuance to review our plans before the
Community Development Board. As I understand it, the next meeting will be July 18, 2006.
Thank you,
Douglas Birch
LBR Holdings, III, LLC
Please confirm receiving this email, thank you.
1
• 0
CDB Meeting Date: June 20, 2006
Case Number: FLD2005-01114
Agenda Item: E. 2.
Owner/Applicant: Douglas Birch, LBR Holdings, III, LLC.
Addresses: 1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development Application to reduce the south (rear) setback
from 20 feet to 10 feet within the Office (O) District, pursuant to Section
2-1003.F of the Community Development Code; and to allow non-
residential off-street parking within the Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District with deviations to the south (front) setback
from 25 feet to 10 feet and west (front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet;
and to allow the encroachment of a drive aisle within the required sight
visibility triangles along South Hillcrest Avenue as a Residential Infill
Project, pursuant to Sections 2-204.C and E of the Community
Development Code.
CURRENT ZONING: Office (O) District; and
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District.
CURRENT FUTURE LAND Residential/Office General (R/OG); and
USE CATEGORY: Residential Urban (RU).
PROPERTY USE: Current Uses: Office and Vacant (Formerly Detached Dwelling).
Proposed Uses: Office and Non-Residential Off-Street Parking.
EXISTING North: Office (O) Offices.
SURROUNDING ZONING South: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Detached Dwellings.
AND USES: East: Office (O); and Offices; and
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Detached Dwellings.
West: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) City Park.
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The subject properties, which total approximately 0.681 acres, are located on the east side of South
Hillcrest Avenue, between Court and Rogers Streets. The northernmost property is within the Office (O)
District and consists of a two-story office building with accessory surface parking. The southernmost
property is within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and is presently vacant;
however the parcel previously consisted of a single-family detached dwelling. The surrounding area
consists of offices and single-family detached dwellings, as well as a City Park that is presently under
construction.
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 1
0 0
Development Proposal:
The development proposal is twofold. The first part involves a parcel of land located within the Office
(O) District and consists of the following improvements:
? Construction of a second story addition to an existing office building;
? A partial reconfiguration of an existing surface parking lot;
? Closure of an existing curb cut along South Hillcrest Avenue; and
? Elimination of an existing refuse enclosure at the southeast corner of the parcel.
The second part involves and abutting parcel of land located within the Low Medium Density Residential
(LMDR) District and consists of the following improvements:
? Construction of a non-residential off-street parking lot;
? Construction of a refuse enclosure at the south end of the parcel;
? Construction of a three-foot high screen wall; and
? Installation of associated landscaping.
Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.): Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, the maximum allowable
F.A.R. for properties with a designation of Residential/Office General is 0.5. As such, the maximum
development potential of the 0.506-acre northernmost parcel is 11,020.68 square feet. With the
construction of the proposed addition, the building will be 10,553 square feet in size, which results in an
F.A.R. of 0.47. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Countywide
Future Land Use Plan with regard to the maximum allowable F.A.R.
Building Height: Pursuant to Section 2-1002 of the Community Development Code, the maximum
allowable height for an office use within the Office (O) District is 30 feet. The height of the existing
office building measures approximately 24 feet to the roof deck and the proposed addition will be
constructed to match this existing height. Therefore, based upon the above, the development proposal is
consistent with the requirements of Section 2-1002 of the Community Development Code.
Off-Street Parkiniz: Pursuant to Section 2-1002 of the Community Development Code, parking is
required to be provided at a rate of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for office uses.
Based upon the above, the proposed 10,553 square foot office requires 32 parking spaces. As proposed,
a total of 34 parking spaces will be provided; thus the development proposal exceeds its parking
requirement.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Code, all outside
mechanical equipment shall be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting
properties. A sight line study has been provided with regard to the visibility of the proposed mechanical
equipment from the Rogers Street right-of-way, and said study depicts that the mechanical equipment
will not be visible from the right-of-way; however the issue of visibility remains with regard to the South
Hillcrest Avenue right-of-way. As such, it is attached as a condition of approval that a sight line study
indicating the mechanical equipment will not be visible from the South Hillcrest Avenue right-of-way
must be provided prior to the issuance of a Development Order, or that the plans must be revised to
include the screening of the proposed mechanical equipment. In the event that the proposed mechanical
equipment will be visible from the South Hillcrest Avenue right-of-way or any other adjacent right-of-
way or property, adequate screening of the equipment will be required prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, to
minimize hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structures or landscaping may be installed which
will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 2
• •
sight visibility triangles. The north/south drive aisle within the proposed non-residential off-street
parking lot will encroach upon the required sight visibility triangles on the north and south sides of the
driveway connecting this drive aisle to the adjacent South Hillcrest Avenue.
The intent of the sight visibility triangles is to enable those vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing a right-
of-way and those vehicles stopped at a stop bar while leaving a site to have a clear and unobstructed view
of one another. The proposed encroachment of the drive aisle upon the sight visibility triangles will not
result in a conflict with this intent as the vehicles within the encroaching drive aisle will be the very thing
those vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing the right-of-way are attempting to see. Further, those
vehicles stopped at the stop bar while leaving the site will not have their clear and unobstructed view of
vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing the right-of-way impacted by any vehicle within the drive aisle as
such vehicle would be located to the rear of the vehicle leaving the site.
Granting the requested encroachment upon the sight visibility triangles will not result in the grant of a
special privilege as similar reductions have been approved elsewhere under similar circumstances. It is
noted that the City's Engineering Department has indicated support for this request. Based upon the
above, positive findings can be made with respect to allowing encroachments within the sight visibility
triangles as set forth in Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code.
Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not
involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground
unless such undergrounding is not practicable. It is attached as a condition of approval that all on-site
utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are placed underground as part of the
redevelopment of the site and that a notation to this effect is provided on the site plan prior to the
issuance of any building permits.
Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, a twelve foot (12)
wide landscape buffer consisting of one (1) tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage is required along the
eastern perimeter of the parcel consisting of the proposed non-residential off-street parking lot. As
proposed, the landscape plan includes a ten-foot (10') wide buffer along the eastern perimeter and does
not provide for 100% shrub coverage.
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development
Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the
application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table
depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria:
1. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A
part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed
on the parcel proposed for development; or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X
proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-11114 - Page 3
Consistent Inconsistent
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic
corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in
which the parcel monosed for development is located.
As expressed above, the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent
with all applicable criteria. Specifically, the proposed landscaping along the perimeters of the proposed
non-residential off-street parking lot retains numerous existing mature trees and proposes to plant
additional trees in excess of the minimum requirements. Further, ample groundcovers/shrubs are
proposed along these perimeters consistent with the requirements of Code. As noted previously, 100%
shrub coverage along the eastern perimeter is not proposed, this is due to two issues: the root systems of
the existing trees make it difficult if not impossible to fully plant the buffer area; and the need to provide
maintenance access to those plantings that can be provided. However, there are some locations along this
buffer area that are not impacted by the existing root systems and would not compromise maintenance
access that could be provided with additional groundcovers/shrubs, specifically along the eastern fagade
of the proposed screen wall. The provision of groundcovers/shrubs in these locations is attached as a
condition of approval to be addressed prior to the issuance of a Development Order. Based upon the
above and subject to the attached condition being addressed, positive findings can be made with regard to
the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program.
It is noted that pursuant to Section 4-1102.A.8 of the Community Development Code, the landscape plan
shall include the location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing landscape
materials. Previous versions of the proposed landscape plan included this information; however the most
recent submittal does not. It has been attached as a condition of approval that a revised landscape plan
including this information must be provided prior to the issuance of a Development Order.
It is further noted that the development proposal will create areas of excess pavement that could be cut
out to provide additional landscape buffer to the adjacent single-family detached dwellings and along
South Hillcrest Avenue. These areas specifically exist as follows: along the south side of the one-way
drive aisle lying east of the angled parking; and adjacent to the westernmost angled parking space. It is
attached as a condition of approval that a revised landscape plan eliminating these areas of excess
pavement must be provided prior to the issuance of a Development Order.
Solid Waste: The development proposal includes the elimination of the existing refuse enclosure located
on the northernmost parcel within the subject property and the construction of a new 12-foot by 10-foot
refuse enclosure at the south end of-the southernmost parcel. The proposed solid waste facility has been
found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Si gnage: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. Any
future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the
subject property.
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 4
•
•
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency
of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-204 and 2-1003 of the
Community Development Code:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
F.A.R. 0.5 0.47 X
Height 30 feet 24 feet X
Setbacks Front: 25 feet (North) 25 feet X
(O) (West) 27.2 feet X
Side: 10 feet (South) 10 feet X
(East) 3 - 5 feet Xl
Setbacks Front: 10 - 25 feet (South) 10 feet X
(LMDR) (West) 10 feet X
Side: 0 - 5 feet (East) 12 feet X
Parking Spaces Offices - 3.0 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA 34 parking spaces X
32 spaces)
See above discussion with regard to Setbacks for further information.
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of
the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-204.C of the Community
Development Code (Non-Residential Off-Street Parking):
1. The parcel proposed for development is contiguous to the parcel on which the non- X
residential use will be served by the off-street parking spaces is located and has a
common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for development is
located immediately across a public road from the non-residential use which will be
served by the off-street parking spaces, provided that access to the off-street parking
does not involve the use of local streets which have residential units on both sides of
the street.
2. No off-street parking spaces are located in the required front setback for detached X
dwellings in the LMDR District or within ten feet, whichever is greater, or within
ten feet of a side or rear lot line, except along the common boundary of the parcel
proposed for development and the parcel on which the non-residential use which
will be served by the off-street parking spaces.
3. Off-street parking spaces are screened by a wall or fence of at least three feet in X1
height, which is landscaped on the external side with a continuous hedge or non-
deciduous vine.
4. All outdoor lighting is automatically switched to turn off at 9:00 pm. X
5. All oarkine spaces shall be surface oarkine. X
Inconsistent
While the required three-foot high wall has been provided in accordance with these provisions, it is noted that a detail (i.e. elevation) of
this wall clarifying its intended appearance has not been provided. The provision of this detail prior to the issuance of a Development
Order has been attached as a condition of approval.
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as
per Section 2-204.E of the Community Development Code (Residential Infill Projects):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following:
intensity or other development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
oroiect will not materially reduce the fair market value of abuttine Droner
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 5
• •
Consistent Inconsistent
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access X
or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character
and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as
per Section 2-10031 of the Community Development Code (Offices):
1. Height:
a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in N/A N/A
excess of the minimum required or improved design and appearance;
b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from N/A N/A
any adjacent residential property.
2. No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more N/A N/A
than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for
development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign
program.
3. Off-street parking. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that N/A N/A
the likely use of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than
otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used
for storaee or other non-varkine demand Qeneratina Purposes.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level
Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual. acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 6
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its
meeting of May 4, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the
Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of
law:
Findings of Fact:
1. That the subject properties total approximately 0.681 acres and are located on the east side of South
Hillcrest Avenue, between Court and Rogers Streets;
2. That the northernmost property is located within the Office (O) District and the Residential/Office
General (R/OG) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. That the southernmost property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category;
4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts; and
5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law:
1. That the encroachment of the north/south drive aisle upon the sight visibility triangles along South
Hillcrest Avenue will not result in the grant of a special privilege as similar reductions have been
approved elsewhere under similar circumstances;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Sections 2-204
and 2-1003 of the Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-204.C., 2-
204.E. and 2-1003.F. of the Community Development Code;
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as
per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and
5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as
per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development
Application to reduce the south (rear) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet within the Office (O) District,
pursuant to Section 2-1003Y of the Community Development Code; and to allow non-residential off-
street parking within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with deviations to the south
(front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and west (front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet; and to allow the
encroachment of a drive aisle within the required sight visibility triangles along South Hillcrest Avenue
as a Residential M11 Project, pursuant to Sections 2-204.C and E of the Community Development Code
with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the plans must be revised to include a detail (i.e.
elevation) of the three-foot high buffer wall with adequate information as to its appearance;
2. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the landscape plan must be revised to provide
additional groundcovers/shrubs adjacent to the east fagade of the screen wall where not impacted by
the existing root systems and not compromising maintenance access;
3. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the landscape plan must be revised to include the
location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing landscape materials;
4. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the areas of excess pavement along the south side
of the one-way drive aisle lying east of the angled parking, and adjacent to the westernmost angled
parking space must be eliminated and incorporated into the adjacent landscape areas;
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 7
• 0
5. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, a sight line study must be provided indicating the
mechanical equipment will not be visible from the South Hillcrest Avenue right-of-way, or that the
plans must be revised to include the adequate screening of the mechanical equipment;
6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all Fire Department conditions must be addressed;
7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a tree preservation plan prepared by a certified
arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture must
be provided. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities
impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address
these impacts (i.e. crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems). Other data required
on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or
in the root prune lines if required), the tree barricade detail, and any other pertinent information
relating to tree preservation;
8. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, evidence of filing a Unity of Title with Pinellas
County between all parcels involved in the application (14-29-15-10854-005-0080 and 14-29-15-
10854-005-0110) must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department;
9. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a notation must be provided on the site plan
stating that all existing and proposed on-site utility facilities will be placed underground;
10. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from
F.D.O.T. for work in the Court Street/S.R. 60 right-of-way must be provided;
11. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit must be
provided;
12. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the storm vault must be revised such that storm
water volume is stored in a vault or enlarged pipe system but not in the voids of a gravel bed. As the
vault has no positive outfall it is to be designed for a 50-year storm event with a 1-hour time of
concentration. The high water level in the vault is to designed to provide 6" of freeboard;
13. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be
existing or proposed, must be placed underground;
14. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any required Transportation Impact Fees
must be paid;
15. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all utility equipment, including but not
limited to electrical and water meters, must be screened from view and/or painted to match the
building to which they are attached, as applicable;
16. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, adequate screening of the mechanical
equipment must be provided in the event that said mechanical equipment is visible from any adjacent
right-of-way or property;
17. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff;
18. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water
capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall
be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants
are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in
accordance with Fire Department requirements;
19. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the
construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the
building to which they are attached, as applicable;
20. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated
with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final
sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes:
(a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font
style and size; and
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 8
(b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the
colors, materials and architectural style of the building;
21. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development
Board approval (by June 20, 2007); and
22. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first
building permit.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff_
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:
? Application
? Location Map
? Aerial Map
? Future Land Use Map
? Zoning Map
? Existing Surrounding Uses Map
? Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S. (Planning DepartmentiCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBICourt Street 1401 LBR (O) - 06-20-06(M)I Court St 1401 -
StaffReport 06-20-06doc
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 - Page 9
0 9
Robert G. Tefft
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727) 562-4539
robert.tefft(a-)myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Planner III
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports.
Senior Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as,
but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text
amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports.
Make presentations to various City Boards.
Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003
Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as,
but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its
display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the
Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance.
Assistant Planner
City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida
Performed technical review of and prepared staff
Performed reviews of building permit applications
ordinances, land development regulations, codes,
professionals and the public.
October 1999 to March 2001
f reports for site plan development applications.
Provided information on land use applications,
and related planning programs/services to other
EDUCATION
• Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999
LICENSES & CERTIFICATES
• American Planning Association
Community Development Board - June 20, 2006
FLD2005-1 1 1 14 -Page 10
t
• . i
Check list for CDB Agenda & Application sent to
City Clerks Office
FLD2005-11114
1401 Court Street
INITIALS
Application Form
Parcel ID
Letter of Authorization
Survey or Legal Description
Copy of 400 scale Zoning Atlas with property outlined and 500' radius
hand drawn from outside perimter of site
2 x 2 Map s required for ANX, LUZ & Z
LARGE SCALE AMENDMENTS
Sherry Watkins
v
v?
YA
YES o
zsIW
5 -1 s
cooooo?p
F D2005-1 1114
1401 COURT ST
Date Received: 11/30/2005
LBR OFFICE EXPANSION
ZONING DISTRICT: O
LAND USE: R/OG
ATLAS PAGE: 297A
PLANNER OF RECORD: R -T
CLWCoverSheet
IN I
I
?Cg1RT S.A. as,
r - - -L
L - J
0
ROGE RS
G
../ II
(t ET
t
I
i
a"REET
MAGNOWI
O I- LOTUS
BUDLEIGH
O
r --,
r
otoll 10f 5
VNarwater
U
--................ PREPARED BY
S.R. so C PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING / GIS
_ 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756
I I
{ Ph.: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)526-4755
-- www.clearwater-tl.com
1 ... ... _ ......
Dbel;mar:
8rREET - ? ? -_ I Pltlls'brmason date is /wnished by dre ciyol G/earwafar
m
1121CPublb WorkeAdminisfrafiolvEngirroedny, endmusffre acmpis
?d -fhm? did br n. me unders fdeved.- fhel me data
I
' u5£l WNme oloping gn%chr
r+ ? ----- ; mlrmfrucbre fnnnrory.NSUCh, db Ciy /Cbamete r PWAI
PWArE
' ? makes no wanamieA eupmssadorimplied, mncamng me
- " "' - - - - .. - _ amu-ry, onnp'efenesA retiabAry, or auihbxly of fNs data /or any
0 le omerperdmhI uae. FurMermore, Me (:'ry of CbarwalerPWA/E
no (abrFry vmasoaver associated em the me or misuse
of.uchdal..
N
STREET
w? E tea
i ? i I zoo too o xoo
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
LDR-Low Densy Resdentlal
- .......... _ LMDR- Law Medium Denshy Residential
_ MDR - Medium Density Residential
STREET MHDR- Medium High Density Residential
HDR - High Density Reeidenflal
MHP M.N. Home Park
?I CRNCOD- Coachman Ridge Neighborhood Conservation
T iy ... _ Overlay District
6 IENCOD- Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation
Overlay District
// - COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS
lqo / /I v O.Office
t CCU I ? T•Tourism
C - Commercial
D - Downtown
?sr s RGAO SPECIAL USE DISTRICTS
0 O f Lr? IB 24 IRT- Industrial, Research and Technology
I - Instftutuionsl
OSJR - Open SpacalRacreatbnal
O P- Preservation Area
t '
T City Owned Property
1._.. JASMINE J WAY Agreement to Annex
COUNTY HIGHWAY
LL O STATE HIGHWAY
DRIVE Fit C3 U.S. HIGHWAY
i r - .'
II
y L. - J SUB NUMBER (' - Refer to Plat)
L{
O O BLOCKNUMBER
PATH O
SUB PARCEL NUMBER
O PARCEL NUMBER(M&B)
LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP)
STREET PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY
LOT OWNERSHIP LINE
i ORIGINAL PLATTED LOT LINE
I
Zoning Atlas
................. __. _...........
.
Aug 26, 2003
i
297A
JEFFOROS ---..... ....-__.... .._......._._.
ITr- STREET.
Tl-i
1?
21
8
11 Zof 5
__ xx gg
1 for mt ea 2 2 2 $ 2 = e,n Y f » n1o•n 28 e/ eS e6 67 u 31 JS 279
a _ _ kD m tD= CITY OF CLEARWATER
? _ ? e9 t 4 56R 57 t? 1?1 •A7
1 s = S.A. $90 af
$ m s - . - - - a$ +? f E OD LL?`t I P111 U COCir` V, rL0MDA
t .2..1 11 10 i it ! 6 p C T ptt Y pp `pp ` - G? 4 PREPARED BY
Q? PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
t ?- Ate. -NC!, N-C
a » ,o n, onweee,ek. ,t !? ?I3I 4 Q tRtY $ f
1 100 S 3 Ile Me., Crov ter, R 337%
m] rn I/y 2 13 1 a C R / S 6 7 0 9 10 .e eo
na y+ lte Im A 2 3 + t 2 3 Ph.: (es?se:-nsD, ra.: (ms)s21:-e7ss
uy2 3 2 "f < na 3 < » ^ ° a a a d < rn 7 6 rto ? m _ "r nflpw..aearwel«-ncom/engine«/
ne X12 IN /d 3 4 e s t E?20 y19 n1e n 16 is t1 13 12 "a e 7 6 nt 20 19 1 DIM°kner.
I t g 1d i/ S .
roa 1- i ! Y
i+ lro p/ / 4011 I/O $ GROVE 2 t1 Pvalle Wo(Ill, AddOala 1. Mnallud Ian City or orw0ter
p Q 9T. and used by the remelt with g the Im uhq,o and m must be a ocepbd
S 10 r0e Q f # $ ! p $ and 1°d as the cte load that the data
O s QY f R 8 - f t was collected fe, !or the the
the . the Purpose of Of developing 0 gapnle
j IOe ? roe +D f1 f s o,' . ? ? 1i + f C p d ? S Mfro IfOk1n1C1Yf! InrMlpy. As wch !h! City el Clearwater PWA /E
l1 6 ?. 9 at 6 r 11 sf I/ k i. f k 1 1 2 3 2 3 1 1 6I 7 1 t(?Q • fw0k1k n0 Warranties, expressed or W Ilea. lonekminq Ina
s" 4 ak D 9 10 2 3 1 O I accuroey, eomgetMeek, rntoblllty. or n°alflty of this data for
° » e 71 >, ¦ /, f 1 ro0 rot "e Ill Ia I t 2 3 any alher parltculor use. rurlhermere, the City of Clearwater
_= 7 e tt 7 e n t ! , e 7 6 19 10 17 16 12 it Of PWA/E a.kumes ne Itoaulty who+koew, -doled with the use
e roa n E Q ! S 13 U 13 0 7 6 3 20 19 16 IX n'Nuke of wth date.
LAMA 2 20 lOD this Allos page is suE?fecl le Periodic ehongef.
' ! / 9t1292:r rar Mfeematlan aa0u1 totes( r Nslane please coil PWA/E «
:R11gARR i n € Q! 4 8 akD plrr wee $Ile.
f9 1e t7 16 2222223 !& $ ? ? A
20 Is a i3 t2 n e ! 1 /e ?
+ 3 4 ro I?
», nn a ,a,oee,eel,a, N
+ 2 3 1 S 6 7 e 9 10 » 1 2] ro /' 2 3 1 s e 7 ° 9 10 if + 2 I
# S i x 1 2 3
» 4 1 7 e S 20 19 10 17 t0 1S 11 U 12 it 0 7 6 S >f 20 19 Is
$ I T $ € 2 ! $ =V91/MD ' f _ ID ! l 7 ro fE ! 14.
L
2 H3 $ y QQ ?? ?'?. ' ?•t 0 100 200 400 600
2 '3 4 6 7 0 I9 f0 2 F t + 21 s
'ex 20 RE
e SCALE: 1" 400'
1k? 16 17 18 t5 t1 13 12 It
t
p 19 >t ?€ R s n» 2 23
mu-i
t a I $` PARK 3 3 22 LEGEND;
OS/R
R 21 re y
t a, 3 t 1 / 1,tP 31,
E f! S S 20 f0 21/01
22 2 2'
s P i 2 ] 4 S e 7 f. n« .. I CREST LAKE PARK O BLOCK NUMBER
a lot let
1? +11' 11 Ig 12 11 a 19 atf tk-Ib11
!/Ot aor Iq 10 CEI 1234 LOT ADDRESS
R s 2 to N 00
ee s'-.r $ ED
-t7-n° 24 4 4 ? ,Ar 1 1 /rt $ ?? "$imT1 $" its a qt7 06.182- 3, ul 1 ? CITY LIMITS LINE
a ' c
2 tm+ I 23 sd44b A3 1'*??'S Irro ?2? t tD/ 9 Is ms 2 r---1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY
1 I
are L--? OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS
7 11e 22 2 6 ^? \?,,, 11t3 15 16 17 fe 19 20 21 22 23 21 2 ?. tat 10 Ie tee 3
_ 21 1444 13 12 ti¢t !!t o!! g! 0 7?ri 6 Syy 3 mt a 11 11 IN I 1
f0 P ? AGREEMENT TO ANNEX
6 elf, I xa2G DS'" 9 Pe+2 i E i! ! ! f /d
+ f/1 as 12
13 14 --!1- $ / CITY OWNED PROPERTY
S =» t t7 16 1S f1 71
=n t9 2x pp $ ; Ip 9 r1tANWlA $116EET $ &s n I
f f ? 3 2 22 44 11 1S Q .tamom ? r t
t$ rAtYANKUN t fp 11 ? ? 6 ? 1 2 i f01 1 2e _ MDR ZONING DESIGNATION
J0p 2 F? E3 2 : = O = 3 3 12 ?? 1 , 1+ t2 0 21 2 toe ace 2 1i I my 2 ZONE LINE
2 t 16 7 t 19 20 21 2 5 311 1e+ +I 2210!! 9x 6 R7?1 6p S¦ 3 _ a/ 3 26m
6
81e7i 2?i2gt a
15 1 i 2 12 A i e 7 4 1 tre t/e 4 25 m 41
I
Rb if2 S t $ eT. $ m8 21 alt $
$ DE LEON 016 is 1
4, f- 14 17 1e 2 =of i 6 23 p aol _ ?
t4 1 18 17 ' 2 26 2? 7 22 ate
00 2223 24 1
114''312 3 g 21 act ?4-
13 f2t t? 9 L? 1 3 2 S +s11+ 11 1 ul
iey Y 1 ? 2 2 Lt 24 .10 S All 9 an _
$ EAN `._ 7 ??4 9 aay i0.. 29 4
Ie' I CB ' Ile 2W u 2 l Y2 32 6 7 Na it to IOI
ss pg EE21 p e ?a----+-
2 ? 'a 213 22 ] q OS/R
for
20 10 ae 411 12 17
C1 1$ 2D 19 =? = R I S?, 3 a 19 18 17 16 8 its 13
_COURT 16
2 3 s.A. 15 ?wI14 +s «}k 3gg ?/ S REVISED:
$ $ 15 - 11 "26- ` _ WV TO OAT BLVD. ha a° C 03/08/99
ec S.A. 110 ZONING ATLAS
cC aa L?
o $ 3 2 `? `. t 1 2 gt S a eD e0 " eo $
X68 ? 297A 2978 i NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 2 8 8A
e 14 - 29S - 15 E
FLDZOS 11114 30f.3
`
4
A ZS
°
7B
25
8
A
?
$ 30 o
>a 4
1
Orjd CITY OF CLEARWATER
?(A
IF
111,
a
d ?" Qr AND VICINITY
PINELLAS COUNTY
FLORIDA
COVaT g 8 - - - g R .
`\ z
a
PREPARED
5 4 3 JO V11Ltai COUIR j
?
a STREET S.a. 871 $
ns?+°
°"" oa g - I
!
_? PUBWC WORKS NISTRATION
s a 3 x t eo A ti%
pFLL
?
` r
3 ! .
t
ba ?m-af ENGINEERING
7
1
>DA
fi ]0
]> vrr
a
Q' to- 0o
1 s
l i e i x t
f
a Z
a° $
i
y 9 100 S 9)51:7 Ave., C ar. 3375[.
?? ? Ph: (747)561-4730, Far (727)526-4755
I
I 1 xd f5 41 I
1" +
y
C
1 t)
+a '°
7
0t
7f 23d
611
'.
B
t
,.8.
600
a
„
annex
8
B w
a
A r
A I
9 E?
/
t
?
Fe
!!ppp
G asii
I C
OIEN pAK!
GOLF COURSE
Y hll
D://>'aw.deof•ater-Il.eam/Clly_Depoitments/puollc_eo?xs/endneer/
Dlsnoimer.
8 , 1 7 12 13
STREET PuoOC Inform01l0n data Is furnished Dy the Clty or Cleorwoler
6
8 ara ++A
,7
so
9
e J
q.
it
'r £ £
„ R
G F
e
'
ft et
41/01 PuWlc Worsts Admhbtratlon/EngnewIng, end must be accepted
old used by the recsplent with the understandOg ,at the data
recetv°e
al
d r
,
h
f d
?
a9r
7
I <
I
i?
s
a
??
G0 OAS,
n
l
C
t
+ fa 4a
t S
a 77
f
Tt
to
0t 8
t wos c
ec
e
o, t
e parpose o
e.eloo
q a graple
InfrosImclure f-Rory. As -1. the City of Cleorvoter PWA/E
motes no w.rr
Iell or implied, con' tnq Ina
.I
(
s el -e MGS
accurOC
eom
nl
Dllit
r
n
ai
l
d
I
$ ? r
+
i • +o a ,: q u + le 1e
a4 K
0S/ $ ;
II .
.
lr .
>.
p
i r
y, or >u
a
oo
o
n
>
ata
.,
any at, 0 IsIcmor we
Fudherm.re
the Cit
of Clearwater
7 ¦
r R a
R r A +> as .
,
y
PwAA assumes no nobility whatsoever ....closed wl+h the u
In
C 6 8 TURNEa $ °7 F$ G
F t0 9 8 r rhi u or auto auto.
eo
I TM > pp
3 ea
No
t db1
yp of
0a 6
4
3 F
1
t t » 1 t0 ; 4 'a r
6 1
8 V U l 9
12 13 ihtoqa Is eceI'e.L+ .
for In rmmetI- about lal>sl rwvi>mn> please Cell PwA/E or
8
9
I
Olt
4
2
so
.
eo
c visa .u web site.
one /01
10
9
It
11
e
E -
:.... ...,
. 16
ea
a
woe
ea%
oa .on-+1ss
RR
8
I
$
IV
>
ne•-
a >.e. ON 42/02
g 8 -
.. _ -en -
-
. too
?
? ?
E K
G @@
II aDa
?
?
e
?
Y
xy+?
7 g
°! 42/OS
7 8
a -
O 12 t2 ere - '1S
.... m Q g
ell 5 iii 18 17 1 15 t4 t
iP
11
-10
9r
;8
8
10
42/04
71
1
e3f
4
t
2
3 4
S
G
7
8
9 eoa
I 1 >o0 ro
8 o
>a1
o /
r ? 0 >o. 1<
.
.A
= 6
11
12
1
t3
o
1J
r ...
t7
,l
' era
S
ere 3 0 100 200 400 600
14
2
70
5 o
;o,
e
0
r >
?en
10
7
IS
et.
3
i ; 8
@ 8 g
@
5
G
I 7
1
E
"Fir
I'-
+
10
er+ 42/05
>ot
0
8
«
2/12
IM
i
..;
l 11: 2 et
A
INE
TREE
1
$ I
S
SCALE: t" 400
9 +ra 42106 gJ a 3 2 1 0 4 D
i_ : 12: 40 yx 024
i6 h
4
e 70 }
' s 1
I >IV ; 4
/14 9 17 I 15 14 13 12 11 10 LEGEND:
5.7
so
12/O7 ro
>
t so a
13 11 I N,
a r N
si
QQ r 1 >n' : .44/13:. .' 42
/15 rop
1
et
a
to t
2 3
4 S
6 7
I
ro
w l a rz 8
L+'
.... .. ta
J t
e
'O 8 g
no
I ;
1
f2
13
O BLOCK NUMBER
^ $ -
ORUIp o $ I
9
S N
pII-ut ROAD 8 1234 LOT ADDRESS
A&
eol « $ D
0
I
act
`6
5 _
4 3
2
1
G B> ?f>3 a
9
B 7
S 4 3
W
A
1D1
,
wwt
S0.
s
701
1
1
w
10
"a
wo
27
so
Ad. 29
T
t
eo
/
a4 0, „ °
Png
C ? --?-?
CITY LIMITS LINE
sro
7
^
V
oo w
alI
2 1?
pl
111
100
aoa
19
iJ
evl
°06
ay 2
2 roI
11
26
and
29 g0
^
^
^
M
r--1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY
L
?
B
9 Iii C
I
V U N4 401 2 m ^ ^ OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS
--
aoa B 1U
k11 1 17 10 11 12 13 14 1S t8 17
18
of 9D t8
woe
pa 3 aoa
3
Boa 12
25,,
30 eo4 41/02
n
9 _
8
JASMINE @
- ale
18
eta
411
I
13
- 3
woe
<
woo
10
? AGREEMENT TO ANNEX
on e
8
« '
fi NAY $
_. 98
a/a
97 w,
t1 t
5
?0 4 an 24eu era 31 4 air Y1
r s ae
, CITY OWNED PROPERTY
J
'
`
1
1 eol
` «
' C
!! p
@.1` p!
$E p
@ y
n en
'
o q S
SIR u U
n
23
en 32
g
44/03 g
4
g °
1 i 7
Ti
3 6 5 4 3 2 1 g 7
g 8 5 ` 96 ,3
n t ta r ?
T p
22 aga e MDR ZONING DESIGNATION
3 0 83 4 3 2 1 !a1 40 4 too 6 ,
,
15 I.. 33 ^ Olt
B/a VE C H alI •11 wo
ON gs 12 7 y 7
t8 6 a to, ^
use AD
ZONE LINE
7 BPe 1
6 9 10 it 1 2 13 td 10 11 v 13 14 15 1 8 17 1B ooJ _ ar 0 p1 a0e a 21 we roa D4 DT
af r
:
aLl p ' ?t ;t
, L a f
94 '? 11 8 °r0 IOB 7 1rM ,
..1 !3 fd F r1 ?n ? ao, A t0 old a 17 20 no Boa SS o pie an OD t 7 8
? $
- n MADNOId
OR
9J fi t 9 oft lit - 8 C9 rat
..-
. 8 •n
gg /ad ?s
o root 9 u t8 i9n4 na 56 lie
tool
7 6' S 4C raw
} 2 1
7 _
B
loo 92 I
s 70
64 too root
85
72
m tool
37 2 `?
its 3
g 4 S
i 1418
a
_
1
? 9
8
5
S
4
2
1 54 w4 57 ?y -
r d
4 10
a
5 3 7 53 1 roa 63 u 86 p0 ?yl w 3 , E. MAONOII FT.
lor` I g 1W VE GH SUB
9 10 It 12 13 14 roll
10 p D
11 DD 4 8- -68 taro Z 1004
iD 53 men 58
o0 toot
1008
82
67 0f
70 0 B
tool singed !
E
S
p
1
2
13
11
15 ,
6
17
18
Iw
vi
e
ale
laoa
rwe
79
row
1 2
' 3
4
5 S 1ti BU Z all & ?N sy
N@ g
@ g Q
F C 4? i Yf
1 o
A 89 52 59 loll t2 I
ao E
R q lola 66 89 m o
`5
_ LOTUS PATH $ 88 51 lo A rou B IS on 13 C t 12 11
1101 ? g Q rol> 1
IOTUS PATH $ 41 Iq 4 F 2 2 2
_
OH
21
m
:
S
8 7
!
F
50
7
V ]
,1,
E
10
T11 1
R13
1s
16 g7
rrol
49
6
4 rot E. LOTUS AD1
8 N 1 Q
rroo 2 1 }
E, 42 1 15
1104 3 9
3
'
=
wo 43 11 TgH 1B V1 17 1 6 15 14 13 12 1 I
'El
`U T
7 -
1
0 8 rro 11 t, 1
° Irol 9 2 7
+s _
sott-sit
?
!yf
A A 7 8 S 4 3 2
?' 1
!t 17
hoe
s BS
t
4
B 87 82 81 BO 79 78 77 76 75 7a 73
•
AR
-01,
a REVISED:
-? -
_
E
!
=
a
L1
p
L1
so
B
>R
8 7 1
4
$ 3 8/26/2002
?
? ZONING ATLAS
21/012 iiii
. .. . _ ............. 30 29 2 8 27 26 1t6 24 246 _
SS 5 „
^ $
r7
?J6A
! :
1
°
3d5
1
2
}
4
s '
6
@
7
B 8 8 «
1 /4 Of SECTION
SE
96B
. ? 3 066 307A 15 - 29 S - 15 E
0
0 Page 1 of 1
14 / 29 / 15 / 10854 / 005 / 0080
01-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:59:56
Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales
L B R HOLDINGS INC OBK: 10138 OPG: 0708
1401 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756-6146
EVAC: Non-EUAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 1401 COU RT ST
of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 264.00
f
om 2003 - 2004
l
sa
es
r
:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 6 /1,998 10,138/ 708 750,000 (M) I
1925: Book 013 Pgs 066- 4 /1,994 8,630/1,592 485,000 (H) I
0000: Book Pgs - 8 /1,993 8,356/ 255 834,200 (M) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,972 3,916/ 292 22,000 (U) I
2005 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 615,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000
Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 615,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000
Historic Exem; 0
Taxable: 615,000, Agricultural: 0
.2004 Tax Information
District: Cu Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater view:
05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
05 Taxes: 14, 290. 88
1) 183 x 128 7.50 21, 936.50 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
14, 290.88 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exemptions,
2005 taxes will be
14,290.88
Short Legal BREEZE HILL BLK E, LOTS 8, 9 & 10
Description
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gif?p=14+29+15+10854+005+0080&0=1 12/1/2005
Page 1 of 1
14 / 29 / 15 / 10854 / 005 / 0110
01-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:01:27
Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales
L B R HOLDINGS III OBK: 12925 OPG: 1778
1401 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756-6146
EVAC: Hon-EUAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 1400 E ROGERS ST
of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 264.00
2003 - 2004
l
f
rom
:
sa
es
130,800 Sale Date OR Book/Pa ge Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 7 /2,003 12,925/1,7 78 109,000 (Q) I
1925: Book 013 Pgs 066- 12/1,983 5,6581211 41 55,000 (Q) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( }
0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 ( }
2005 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: i081100 Homestead: NO Ownership % ,000
Goyt Exem: NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: i08,100 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000
Historic Exem: 0
Taxable: 108,100 Agricultural: 0
2004 Tax Information
District: Cu Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View: G olf Course
05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
05 Taxes: 2,511.94
1) 63 x 120 60, 000.00 1.00 T
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
2,511.94 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exemptions,
2005 taxes will be
2, 511. 94
Short Legal BREEZE HILL BLK E, LOT 11
Description
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-giDp=14+29+15+10854+005+0110&o=1 12/1/2005
d3lVNWV31010 &10
IWW121t/d3o ONINW,4
BOUNDARY, rOPWRAPHIC, D 7REE SURVEY 9002
LOTS 8 THROUGH 11, BL K E COURr 07REE7
BREEZE HILL -- --- -- ------f--------- ------ - --
CITY OF CLE4RWA7ER n.r??wn
-)3a
(1(1343
PWELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ..a R11e'
Seven Sbpe 61a ::M
Eex Metlpe
E ?ZHe6te ,
v"
? r
LTi
r... .-.
r ' ?? I s
EX-NO 15'
TO
v
' ir
a ?L ?
I.x% EO ar,?Wrrr vrY wrlrrr•
rrM.,r tree s•IM,
L
Tr'C
a??i 'T. i7?rr{'?. .?_?L
r NOTE: xOMe?
1
(
? ??;
flJ lV r
f'
y'?I
4
1,
pilcn ?1'' a
stlMyrtlerp 6'9
me coranw of a¢e wrcn.vf tleec
Is very hvorenle. lAwel elh ravhw OO rqt Npw
Olk smal 11,1l Oy M4lrw. 1.110mgeclnpremcvevlUl(3)pekna ps -
laleMeM ro r
+
r•?,rrr?
r?r ?
r?e f
LL ?
„
l
,
'
i??Y?
?
COe tlensa . retle ?pe1 M?rr,
• r YM /yr??.??,??1 ? .r ? ??? ?y
~ ?i ?Y_•.}[ r?r I?r r rf r aM
.. M11i
l
L
g NOTE:
Slh MC 100 percenllMpeeon ryseem .MrMrrrI?r.rrrrrr.rrrr
LL
?
I•
?
'
•?
?
?
v
',
?
?r
?
e .
y
y
y
r
/
y
y y
y
?s
r y
yr
O II
lk F L
•r
??
i r rrrrrr
y
OUR
1 eoomow
®
T
-1 11
0 C K
E
" r "? t'.'ti4'AY3..L
F-M
..e1.. ar
a
I IG'RAC7 ' . 7me?e
PLANT MATERIALS LIST
*low w y?M. ,r%m;?lO1f11Qr vou"
WAS
My
A
.aaa vxmmm"
Inr Mlll
3MW aK r W. =Ca.yt/al
llm a MMa.Y wmerLm rm air Atop MMr' aK r e, races a Gomm
lIM I K'Amo 1 a1Marum u ¦NaMa "Sam Ml*Ir UK r r. "to. a Gum
ra s MAX *SID"% L40A M Nall 4% • r, vGL a anal
r M Waft MIINrrir C Y rMUI r art Tom. V m
rws
V iA®ln
a
m(TNIM Gomm
1MWAaC
all" Ml'r.. M our
?
? M6aM1 i &U
M
m » rm vA
AWtlAt
iMl shat aw.
LM
M M imrv= tenors PAW rMWMTOM raw MaM. W mi a omm
'
"
L M
r Vr alga.
MIM.mrO MOM Mvem." VMMMIM.
MOM nkV11M1M
XWLl %lormt M6M. 10
r. • aftim
lr -a9Ml a'w. 0 altOl
w?eaK Irr M offal
1w
m N
Ilr in vdff M rra
LWr MAMIMI ATIM rrr a'-a9Ml Yr. 1 aLLal
•t r lraarldMa lAmn" AGVC JOrr ryM r r. t WILLM
AN 0 iMMIMS1aMM MOMMa I V/MMao MUM Jerlrr r dm% r r. I &MAM
r M so& no=Ma okl?rAM rwMl tars o"m
rM a. Arsrrsr
MOM
SITE PLAN
SCAM 1•.2W
L?
W"1e•m
RMYY.M ?
O
U
u
U
od b
L_ °M
Y t
NN
?uO
J
w
a
?g
Za
z
yy M1
n ybw^s
D" ?-,
re•r AS SHOWN
e.r ?ro
LP-1.01
Z-0
'ON ONLB'
£ 1060
ON 103-
SO/ lZ/L
r -
CD
S
O p
a7 -TI
N
O ?g§ -Tl
z aim n
?D M
> i4l n
a ] I ' 1
0 _fln^v X
Z y
i ?
O Z
r (n
II °
bf
F°
a?
y
M+»n ,xM ?mKdewatn w. wx?.+.am°w?.ei 8uw.i
v.s OxaO,
tnra mrt sm'as NN -NOV. sD/a
K ? l
uw v°s ?Kni vuS ,JK
OU'1- o.u .
aal ,rK ro m u>m
owJ v« m•N • (Na v« ar. - uN) ,l« Ncm • n1 vw.
O,.OwN?
vK n . - ,l« N.O? -
,rK rNm - v« ..re - ,l« O.e.
,fK OKY ,IK s°t -
sO,. °O>n
,PS mo'f ,IK 6[t - B sSo
'll« Nr hNaOFVNm
a« Nsb.
1+. u.aJOJK (?...v),nc ar. (?. av>t.s cw u - L
VIVO 316
atv?s ?iearaoVOIa0-3 'AiNf100 SVl-13NId
9L 'JNH `6Z 'NMl 'til '03S
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
12
4- - m-.°-ea..wl
110N
'1Ib'134 '17VIS (0a(ld'd0I0N'VH
IV13O NVIS C3a.WV::)I(JNV'hi
f r ti`
I I L-I
-? III 4L
axrcww a,wea• { i Nun,x
i9K 5')
HOICCN .mn..
,oxsi. ww .SON. w
..»..-,N..O.x. ?.sT 1
ma o. lox
-11V130 OalNO N a
A/,O K K°ON °.?saern" m.? ]LON
NIL-ON
l .. _ ? a az?sxxs
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEP.R\tWER
%
EXISTING STUCCO EXISTING EXISTING SPANDREL
STOI<F-Fft9 iNT GLASS
s EXISTING NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION
0 z m
- NO SCALE:
O Z
0 D
?-' M O
m -
ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS OF THE ADDITION WILL MATCH TH
E EXISTING
D rn `A MATERIALS AND COLORS AS SHOUN ON THE COLOR PHOTOG=RAPH AS SUBMITTED
o Dr
z L B R OFFICE EXPANSION DATE REVISED COMM. NO.
i'
1401 COURT STREET 3-29-08 5-11-08
8-30-08
1 0464
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 9-07-08
L I"I:eefe Architects illcl
2424 CURLEW RD. PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 727-781-5885
OP OF BRICK
NEW STUCCO PANEL.
COLOR TO MATCH
EXISTING
NEW BRICK COLOR
TO MATCH EXISTING
NEW SPANDREL
NEW STUCCO PANEL.
GLASS COLOR TO NEW STUCCO PANEL.
COLOR TO MATCH
EXISTING MATCH EXISTING COLOR TO MATCH
EXISTING
NEW STOREFRONT.
NEW BRICK. COLOR COLOR TO MATCH NEW BRICK COLOR
TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING TO MATCH EXISTING
SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION
Ott i?r' (I:rr
!JY J
pr?r„rr,Na• '
r?
NEW STUCCO PANEL.
COLOR TO MATCH
EXISTING
EXISTING BRICK
EXISTING BRICK J EXISTING J EXISTING BRICK
STOREFRONT
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
%F_P 14 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT NO SCALE:
CITY OFCLEARWATER ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS OF THE ADDITION WILL MATCH THE EXISTING
MATERIALS AND COLORS AS SHOWN ON THE COLOR PHOTOGRAPH AS SUBMITTED
L B R OFFICE EXPANSION DATE REVISED COMM. NO.
3-29-08 5-11-08 0484
1401 COURT STREET 8-30-08
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 19-07-08
L4:. 0""I:eefe Architects nice
2424 CURLEW RD. PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 727-781-5885
NEW SPANDREL NEW STOREFRONT.
GLASS COLOR TO COLOR TO MATCH
EXISTING
MATCH EXISTING /
PROPOSED I DITION /-I" EXPANSION JOINT
TOP OF BRICK
NEW STUCCO PANEL.
COLOR TO MATCH
EXISTING
NEW BRICK COLOR
TO MATCH EXISTING
NEW STUCCO PANEL.
COLOR TO MATCH
EXISTING
EXISTING BRICK
l9 Ct'J
w? ?? C ..?. 'v71?(
I
h?'f: i?tl
f''fl t,lii
?F
1
EXISTING BRICK
EXISTING STUCCO J EXISTING
PANEL STOREFRONT
EXISTING SPANDREL
GLASS
ORIGINAL EAST BUILDING ELEVATION
RECEIVED
NO SCALE:
SEP 14 2006 ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS OF THE ADDITION WILL MATCH THE EXISTING
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MATERIALS AND COLORS AS SHOWN ON THE COLOR PHOTOGPAPH AS SUBMITTED
CITY OF CLEARNT
LB R OFFICE EXPANSION DATE REVISED COMM. No.
3-29-08 5-11-08 0464
1401 COURT STREET 8-30-08
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 19-07-08
L 0."Kchefe _Architects inc.
2424 CURLEW RD. PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 727-781-5885
1
I" EXPANSION JOINT
r
.wwo i4! ;its .
y•. c?
.per, La= ? ???jEV
TOP OF E
NEW STUCCO PANEL.
COLOR TO MATCH
EXISTING
NEW BRICK COLOR
TO MATCH EXISTING
UPPER FLOOR
NEW STUCCO PANEL.
COLOR TO MATCH
EXISTING
LOWER FLOOR
EXISTING STUCCO EXISTING EXISTING SPANDREL EXISTING BRICK
PANEL STOREFRONT GLASS
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED ED
WEST BUILDING ELEVATION
RECE
,zEP 14 2006 NO SCALE:
ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS OF THE ADDITION WILL MATCH THE EXISTING
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MATERIALS AND COLORS AS SHOWN ON THE COLOR PHOTOGRAPH AS SUBMITTED
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DATE REVISED COMM. NO.
L B R OFFICE EXPANSION 3-29-06 5-11-08 0484
1401 COURT STREET 8-30-08
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 19-07-08
L4: I"I:cefc Architects iikc.
2424 CURLEW RD. PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 727-781-5885
f
1
./ ? I .
ejem to lei 11ettl''
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
ROOF PLAN
NO 5GALE:
SAP 14 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DATE REVISED COMM. NO.
L B R OFFICE EXPANSION 3-29-08 5-11-08 0484
1401 COURT STREET 8-30-08
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 19-07-08
L4: I"Kchefe Architects hic.
2424 CURLEW RD. PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 727-781-5885
I
TOP OF BRICK
_ UPPER FLOOR
5.
LOWER FLOOR
CURB m
ROGERS
STREET
SITE LINE STUDY
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
EP 14 2006
NO 5CALE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LB R OFFICE EXPANSION DATE REVISED COMM. No.
3-29-06 5-11-08 0464
1401 COURT STREET 8-30-08
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 19-07-08
4 I"ICccfe Architects nice
2424 CURLEW RD. PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 727-781-5885
t
ROGERS ST.
51.(48'
?'.I W"1: kl,i
`l r?l ?iil li U1 tltl ltr"•
1
CURB m
S. PILLCREST
AVE.
SITE LINE LINE STUDY S. HILLCREST AVEHILLCREST AVE.
NO SGALE:
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
14 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AMAYATEM
DATE REVISED COMM. NO.
L B R OFFICE EXPANSION 3-29-08 5-11-08 0484
1401 COURT STREET 8-30-08
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 19-07-08
L4: I'I:cefe Architects ilic.
2424 CURLEW RD. PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 727-781-5885
r O? Sx'i? lR?G,T ,
wQ!- _ - cow
Transaction #: 879154
o* Receipt #: 949032
Z`?4q' c?`4.oe Cashier Date: 1118/2006 1:02:17 PM (CLKDMC8)
s couron
(727) 464-4876
Page 1 of
Customer Information Transaction Information Payment Summary
DateReceived: 11/8/2006
Source Code: Clearwater
0 LB&R HOLDINGS INC Q Code: Clearwater
Over
the
Tota
l
Fees
$27
.00
1401 COURT STREET Return Code:
C
t
Clearwater
FL 33756 oun
er Tota
Payments $27
Total
00
.
, Trans Type: Recording
Agent Ref
Num:
1
LP1`?W_! CASH $2700
1 Recorded Items
rrm?c
R (NOTICE) NOTICE
BKPG: 1546811271 CFN.•2006410834 Date:111812006
1:02:15 PSI
From: CLFAR WATER To: LB&R HOLDINGS EVC
Recording @ lst=$10, AddVl=$8.50 ea. 3 $27.00
Indexing @ 1st 4 Names Free, Addt`l=$ l ea. 2 $0.00
0 Search Items
0 Miscellaneous items
18LdaCCD pdaH93
RECEIVED
APR 12 2007
DEVELOPMENT &
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
111111 IQII [1111I?II I[III II[II I?IlII
Print Date:
11/8/2006 1:02:45 PM
Prepared by and Return to:
Roger A. Larson, Esquire
Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel
& Burns, LLP
P.O. Box 1368
Clearwater, Florida 33757-1368
DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE
KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT
MELLAs coumw FLORnA
IN ,T# 20084108341110912906 at 91:02 PM
D TT 12714273
yype:NOTiCE RECORUNG $27.00
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinance of the City of
Clearwater pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the
undersigned, being the fee owner(s) of the following described real property situated in the City of
Clearwater, County of Pinellas and State of Florida, to wit:
Please see attached Exhibit "A" ("Unified Property")
do hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions on said lands,
hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following
particulars:
1. That the aforesaid Unified Property combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage
or portions thereof; shall hereafter be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an
indivisible building site.
2. That the said Unified Property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of
land, and that no portion thereof shall be sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately except
in its entirety, as one plot or parcel of land.
3. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as
provided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the
undersigned, and all parties claiming under them until such time as the same may be released in writing
under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this
instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this day of 2006.
Witnesses:
Print e K.-fks, fit' ? s
int Name: j c?n?19? Wo, S )
LB&R HOLDINGS, INC. a Florida corporation
14 01 Co,,,t .5f,,mt
Cttw-w? F?- 3375-6
?9
riot Name !?
Title:
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
p
BEFORE ME personally appeared ?k1 CVPa-\ LRhi,sas of LB&R
Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation, to me known to be the person(s) described in and who executed the
foregoing instrument on behalf of the corporation, and who acknowledged to me the execution thereof to be
his, her or their free act and deed for the users and purpose herein mentioned.
Witness my hand and official seal this day of 2006.
NoWy Public, ?-
Print Name: X00 AIM.- C Wit
My commission expires:
Cannvsslon a i?001Tl?i
E?Iras 4
IMMS .?
BaiOMt /rgtpll
AML. lRL
0 0
EXHIM "A"
Parcel 1•
Parcel No. 14-29-15-10854-005-0110
Lot 11, Block "E", Breeze Hill, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 66,
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Parcel 2:
Parcel No. 14-29-15-10854-005-0080
Lots 8, 9, and 10, Block E, Breeze Hill, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 66,
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
9371039 v1 - LBRHdldingsDeclamtionofJnityoffitletrms
12-7
0 i
Community Response Team
Planning Dept. Cases - DRC
Case No. Meeting Date:/
Location: `/b C"oon" S?
,a-'Current Use:
?i?ctive Code Enforcement Case,/ yes:
Address numbe yes ,14no) (vacant land)
a- Landscaping ?(no)
,&-Overgrown (yes) no
.a-Debris (yes)' (0
.a?-lnoperative vehicle(s) (yes)
R? uilding(s) good (fair) (poor) (vacant land)
Fencing (none)6 (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
main oo (fair) (poor) (garish)
,a- Grass Parking (yes) Cna
? Residential Parking Violations (yes) (no)
p%Signage (none )& (not ok) (billboard)
sparking (n/ (stripe ) (handicapped) (needs repaving)
e,' Dumpster (enclosed) ((of :e:n:cIo3sa)
a?Outdoor storage (ye??
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
Date: l? Reviewed by: Telephone:
Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT °
Cie arwater
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U
TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
June 14, 2006
Ralph Spencer, (813) 366-0055
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
FLD2005-11114 - 1401 Court Street
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 1
Comments: As per your request, the above referenced item will not be placed on the consent agenda
for the Community Development Board (CDB) meeting of June 20, 2006.
** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tetLiQ,myclearwater.com **
** Visit the Planning Department online at www.nryclearwater.com **
i •
Jun. 14 2006 01:14PM
YOUR LOGO .
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 98133660055 Jun.14 01:14PM 00'35 SND 01 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
FLD2005-1 1 1 14, 86
AL43A CONSULTING CORP ANDERSON, PEGGY
1420 COURT ST 1408 SAN JUAN CT
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6147 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6044
f
ARNOLD, TAWNI L
1430 TURNER ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6145
ARRINGTON, ELSIE A
604 S HILLCREST AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6010
BARNES, RORY A
BARNES, JUDITH C
609 S HILLCREST AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6009
BYERLY, JHOELL R
1221 ESPINA CT
DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9300
COURT EXECUTIVE CENTER
CONDO A
1421 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6172
CURTIS, DORIS M
1405 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6142
DITTON, MATHEW J
DITTON, FRANCINE
1404 TURNER ST E
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6145
EIFERT, JOHN R
10484 SHADY OAK LN
LARGO FL 33777 - 1155
FOWLER ASSOC ARCHITECTS
1421 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6172
BOWERS, PHILIP L JR
1415 TURNER ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6144
COLEMAN, THOMAS F
COLEMAN, KATIE R
1421 ROGERS ST E
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6142
COURTNEY, CAMILLE M
HONICKY, ELINA N
1415 SAN JUAN CT
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6043
DENISON, WILLIAM S
DENISON, SHERILL A
2312 SHELLEY ST
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 4229
DUCLOS, ANTOINETTE
1424 TURNER ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6145
EPPS,BARBARA
1408 TURNER ST E
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6145
GATTUS, MARGARET M
1619 RIDGEWOOD ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5833
R r 7
MANDRUS, BRIAN L
ANDRUS, DONNA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # PH-E
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3947
AYOUB, WENDY
AYOUB,NASSER
1165 PHYLLIS AVE
LARGO FL 33771 - 1221
BRYANT, WILLIAM C
1437 1/2 SAN JUAN CT
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6043
COSTELLO, TRAVIS
DUCLOS, ANTIONETTE
1414 TURNER ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6145
COX, DOUGLAS O
COX, JUDY C
11263 OSBORNE ST
SYLMAR CA 91342 - 7357
DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG
PO BOX 40200
ST PETERSBURG FL 33743 - 0200
EIFERT, JOHN A
1437 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6146
FAGAN, CHARLES R
1408 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6147
GIBBS, BRANDON L
GIBBS, MELISSA S
1411 TURNER ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6144
GIDDENS, JOHN E GREEN, EUGENE J GUGLIELMO, ANTHONY R
GIDDENS, JOANNE L GREEN, MARILYN GUGLIELMO, SHERRY L
1416 ROGERS ST 1436 SAN JUAN CT 1375 E TURNER ST # L
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6143 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6044 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6015
GL IDI, PAULA @&HARTLEY, ROGER P WEHR,CHARLESI
GUIDI, ANDREA F 1430 COURT ST HEHR, JULIANNE P
1438 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6147 1371 TURNER ST
CL3EARWATER FL 33756 - 6147 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6015
HERNANDEZ, JOSE CRUZ
1430 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6143
HERSEM, THOMAS G
HERSEM, COLLEEN G
1421 COURT ST # B
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6172
HETRICK, THOMAS O
HETRICK, JUDY C
1415 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6142
HONIKER, KEITH
1401 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6142
JAYE, DAVID L THE
2856 SHADY OAK CT
CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3012
KENNEDY, MATTHEW J
KENNEDY, JANET
1407 TURNER ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6144
KRUG, WALTER L III
KRUG, KIMBERLY
1419 DE LEON ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6017
LUCENA, ANGEL
LUCENA, RUTH
1440 ROGERS ST E
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6183
MC DOWELL HOLDINGS INC
1433 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6146
MULLARKEY, MARGARET A
1421 COURT ST #A
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6172
HOOVER, ROBERT D
ERICKSON, CHARLES
9296 126TH AVE
LARGO FL 33773 - 1246
JONES, J C JR
JONES, CINDY A
1404 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6143
KERN, ELLIE
ARMBRUSTER, MARGARET
1417 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6142
L B R HOLDINGS III
L B R. HOLDINGS INC
DOUGLAS BIRCH
1401 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6146
MARTIN, JEANETTE L
1419 SAN JUAN CT
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6043
MC GREW, HENRY W
6725 64TH ST N
PINELLAS PARK FL 33781 - 5147
NASON, DEAN JR
1425 DE LEON ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6017
HORNBLOWER, WILLIAM S
1411 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6142
JONES, RUTH I
1428 SAN JUAN CT
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6044
KNOX, CHRISTINE D
KNOX, PAUL L
1438 TURNER ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6145
LEACH, AL PAINTING INC
1441 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6161
M'AYER, DAVID W
CHIROPRACTOR INC
1400 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6147
MEYN, DIRK J
MEYN, CURTIS W
1424 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6143
ORVIS-ALBA, KIMBERLY A
1408 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6143
PAITAKIS, GEORGE PALOMA-RAMIREZ, NICHOLAS R Q A INC
35 NELSON RIDGE RD BENITEZ, HERMELINDA L 1432 COURT ST
PRINCETON NJ 08540 - 7426 1429 SAN JUAN CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6147
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6043
RABIN, THOMAS C MRIVAS, BENJAMIN 46SEACHRIST, SEEMA
1434 TURNER ST 3914 FONTAINBLEAU SEACHRIST, BRIAN
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6145 TAMPA FL 33634 - 7421 1437 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6142
SENICK, WALTER T SPENCER, ROGER L STEARNS, WILL B III
SENICK, JUDY K SPENCER, MARY E STEARNS, JANICE L
12551 FRANK DR N 6 DORADO PL 1424 SAN JUAN CT
SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 1717 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4861 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6044
STEEVES, MICHAEL B STEWART, ALEX W STUEN, CAROL K
1414 COURT ST STEWART, ANGELLA 438 GARDENIA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6147 1425 SAN JUAN CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1007
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6043
SULLIVAN, RONALD SYLA, VALON THOMPSON, CHRISTINE
SULLIVAN, DONALD C 1412 ROGERS ST 1421 TURNER ST
1412 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6143 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6144
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6145
THOMPSON, SARAH L VELBOOM, ETHEL Y WALKER, ROBERT G PA
975 VALLEY VIEW CIR 1431 ROGERS ST 1421 COURT ST # F
PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 4468 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6142 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6172
WALLER, LISA W WEIMAN, NORMA M WHITE, RONNY
11570 N GATE WAY DETERS, ROBERT R 1433 SAN JUAN CT 3216 QUINCY IL L 62 62305 - 3216
ROSWELL GA 30075 - 2340 BOX CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6043
QU
WHITNEY, MARK WILLIAMS, CARLOS W WOJECK, THOMAS J
1417 TURNER ST WILLIAMS, LINDA F WOJECK, FELICIA E
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6144 1420 ROGERS ST 1379 TURNER ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6143 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6015
WRIGHT, ANTHONY P Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
1421 COURT ST # E Sondra Kerr, President
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6172 P.O. Box 8204
Clearwater, FL 33758
•
CITY OF CLEARWATER - -M
PLANNING DEPARTMENT °
earwater
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE _ 4 C...-
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U
TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
June 12, 2006
Ralph Spencer, (813) 366-0055
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
FLD2005-11114 / 1401 Court Street
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3
Comments:
** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefflnmyclearwater.com **
** Visit the Planning Department online at www.nzvclearwater.com **
i •
Jun. 12 2006 02:47PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 98133660055 Jun.12 02:46PM 01'32 SND 03 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #t04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329).