FLD2005-08088? k?a005-- 0r91 ORIGINAL
Clearwater
U
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
0 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF-ME ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
(Revised 04-05-05)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: ROLJ
MAILING ADDRE S:, C I
PHON U BEE 4-[ ?k 0 - FAX NUMBER
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
AGENT NAME:
(Must include ALL owners
on the deed - provide original nature(s) on page 6)
:'i. N??:?•-f/'6.irtr'?f?'_ /.i'1 ?'.t/?t='c""J;•'b ? ???f<?:!L?: e T '? ??"
MAILING ADDRESS: 3
PHONE NUMBER: I FAX NUMBER: ` `/• LF 6 " ;S
CELL NUMBER: 7,2 76,ci - E-MAIL ADDRESS:
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 10 ?. .)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: IL 1 1 I M} 9, Inad ec.. a,% Us
l
(if not listed here, please note the location of this document In the submittal)
PARCEL NUMBER: on °7 . Imo) 3c
PARCEL SIZE: ; c ±
(acres, square feet) a ti
PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: ,. f-t L1!3 e C 'i t /?11r <
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):
Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required num r rking spaces, sped c use, etc.)
0
r ORIGINAL
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202-A.5)
SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D.
1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
4 4
?
m
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
, i'
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
- e
i
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
26
r-;;K FS
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the par
Lt U v/
J
6. PLUWN NG & r`1tLOPMENY S'
The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfacto
on adjacent properties.
tX7
? Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the speck land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is
requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
0
0 ORIGINAL
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im
addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance
the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exeml
to this requirement.
If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
T Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the
C' manual.
Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
c/t I (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), d applicable
fd Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
X ?tormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall
be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
I F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
/LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to
the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
GRADING PLAN, as applicable,
PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; PIAINI
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
*ORIGINAL
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical-equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsee storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
G REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) and color rendering if possible;
? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; C
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; O CT I 0 6 20 or
All open space areas; E L?
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ' PLANNII lIG & DI W-1-OPMENT SV
Streets and drives (dimensioned); CI iY OFLEAHWAT
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
T Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8° DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
N
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
_ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
_ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed
landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule;
_ Typical planting details for .trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
L
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %i X 11) (color rendering if possible);
?r IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
K COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A-23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
/ of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project.
E1 BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions; colors and materials;
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
JJJJJJ to remain.
All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing: freestanding signs
shalt include the street address (numerals)
Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). TDr-IRE 2 (jn
Reduced signage proposal (8'/s X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application_ (Vi=
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) 1
PWNING 9, 0 1*-LOPM
Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: 11 Y UMLEARWA
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is
on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning
Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4.801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway
a=nt at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
is not required.
CAUTION -IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
L.
1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
applicati n ire true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
author City representatives to visit and photograph the property
describ. 'rn this application.
A.D. 20 O t"' to me and/or by
a , who is personally known has
pro uced as
of property owner or representative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ,?-,?y.,
Swo n to and subscribed before day of
me this ?-"s?
Notq Pd* - Stet of Fbrids
V C.wwJWcn Expires Nov 14,20
COM601ert / W 4',10840
8orldsd 8y NdWW Notry AWL
0 0
ORIGINAL
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with Northside
Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for ??y? IC?-hSS 1 ID??s
and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at
ke,
643 `Fr. ?S p[ cl-0 I-r, k- , lying within
County, State of r o?(Cl r. Si
yw/ dr 'L
o roperty Owner
tZlb?S /.b?2;
Address of Property.Owner
i? r-L 336 Zf,,
City/Stale/Zip Code
State of F[nr-lj'a--
County of (2? nCj Jac-
Print Na a of Property Owner
g 13 -IFS.S .S 2-&S
Telephone Number
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge, before me this ZZ day
Zb05 P GIBS
of Aw. IQ-- , by as
who i pknown tom or who has produced
NOTAWPUBUC-3'tMOFFLOW4s identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
Cynthia N. Mardeyn
Coro l lon # DD449308
Expires: JULY 10, 2009
DondedMuAtlandcSonftC®., Inc Notary Public
i nature)
Commission # tN W"q,309
AY'ae r
(SEAL ABOVE) COaj:b to (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped)
PLANNI?a, p.
C QFr:. ....., _.,
i
CITY OF CLEARWAER
!Q AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT
99
?? PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
?ATEp? MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2nd FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint d U5 K1 _ ya P?
)'yn- ? L? -e I ne'-r I rQ S,P ru ( r C
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other docdments necessary
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
5. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify t[A the foregoing is trye and correct.
Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly com issioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
AUD personally appeared 1 116 ' -? ?- (YCO&Who having been first duly sworn
depo s and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
NOTARY PUBIX-STATE OF FLORIDA
G?mthia N. ii
My Commission Expires: Expires: C01IID1iSIIonded 'rhru AtlatnS: application forms/development review/Affidavit to Authorize Agent
?,9ah fs
--Tl7j 111
12
Notary Public
1
:i
t?
A ) ALI?
LLAN i U lUri?«r? f SVGS
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
CITY OF CLEARWAO ER
t
??! a AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT
9 o?
9
? PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
y'ATEA?'
' MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"d FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following describ op trv I N A f
tp- rv sPZ-4-- P?
(Address or General Location)
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
/? jj rG07714
(Nature of request)
3.> That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
/ /VG
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
5. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify th the foregoing is true an corre t.
Prooerty Own .?,• /I I f _ w
GG e"
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned
jt? Zt%K personally appearedTAuA
deposes and says that he/she fully understands the conte
My Commission Expires: I 14
lll-Zen
S: application forms/development review/Affidavit to Authorize Agent
1 4-
on this day of
ho having been first duly sworn
0 0
ORIGINAL
Exhibit A to Flexible Development Application
685 and 689 Bay Esplanade - Bay Esplanade
NES Project # 0532
Description of Request: To raze the existing structures which contain two 2-unit
duplexes and a 13 unit apartment building and to construct an eight (8) unit, five story (4
stories above parking) attached dwelling structure with an increase to the allowable
building height from 35' to 46.83' from BFE to roof deck with an additional height of
4.16' for perimeter parapets. A reduction to the required front yard setback from 15' to
13' for the water feature on the west elevation of the building and reductions to the
required front yard setback on the North from 15' to 12.67' for the building and 15' to 0'
for the trash staging area. Also, a reduction to the east side yard from 10' to 0' for the
removable pool deck pavers. A minimal deviation is also being requested to allow
approximately 2' of the building to encroach into the driveway visibility triangle from a
dead-end street. It is the vision of the Developers to provide two developments that
compliment each other and function in unison with Somerset Street dividing the two
sites. Through this request.for a Level Two Development Approval, two mirror image
development projects are being proposed (a separate application has been submitted for
693-699 Bay Esplanade.)
General Applicable Standards (Section 3-913 (A)):
1. The subject site is located within the Tourist District of the Community
Development Code and is designated Old Florida District by the Beach by
Design program. The site is currently developed with a two story, fifteen
unit attached dwelling and a one story, two unit attached dwelling. The
adjacent properties to the south and west are currently developed with
various types of attached dwelling units ranging from one story to three
stories containing two units to thirty residential units. The proposed
development provides a four story, eight unit attached dwelling with the
parking situated below. The coverage and density of the proposed
development will be less than the existing conditions as a 50% reduction
a the number of units is being proposed. Additionally, the development
l1 P!- U an provides fewer units than the code would permit for the site. The
a proved development trend for the vicinity to the south has allowed
OCT Q 6 200S t ilding heights exceeding this developments proposal. Further, a tour of
t residential structures to the north of the subject site, reveal many
-r Lx 44 mG & QE I.OPMEW15V sidences that appear to be quite tall and are of substantial bulk.
2. A noticeable amount of sites within the area are exhibiting signs of age
and deferred maintenance. The proposed development and subsequent
improvements will substantially increase the value of the subject property,
thereby providing a positive influence on the surrounding property values
which typically encourages reinvestment in the surrounding sites. The
value of the property is estimated at $9,600,000.00 upon completion.
1
0
0 ORIGINAL
The proposed design of the development offers positive health and safety
rewards for the neighborhood by providing green yards that are not
currently present on the site and provides a new and improved structure
that meets current building codes and FEMA requirements. The proposed
site design provides a parking plan that is primarily contained within the
foot print of the building with one driveway access onto Somerset deleting
the current undesired situation of cars backing out into Bay Esplanade. In
addition, the proposal provides for responsible site drainage which will
better serve the community as a whole.
4. The proposed development and site design provides largely improved and
decreased access to the site by providing a single driveway entrance along
Somerset in lieu of access on Bay Esplanade. The site design allows for
forward access to and from the site, deleting the current need for vehicles
to back out into the right of way. Additionally, the large decrease in the
number of units contained on the site will further provide benefit to
minimize the traffic congestion within the neighborhood and community
as a whole.
5. The proposed Old Florida vernacular of the building is in keeping with the
desires of the Beach by Design program and is consistent with many
recently approved developments in the immediate vicinity such as; Ocean
Breeze, the Larissa development, Chalets on White Sands in addition to
being harmonious with the various designs of the existing multifamily
developments in the immediate area. The design provides a decorative
water feature on the west elevation of the building adding more interest to
the streetscape. Additionally, the Developers of this particular site have a
personal interest in landscaping and the proposed plan provides for high
quality and colorful plantings to further enhance the development.
Through materials and design this development will provide a beautiful
upgrade to the existing environment.
6. The proposed decrease in the number of attached dwelling units contained
on the site is the most obvious improvement the development will provide
to the neighborhood. Additionally, the proposed design provides for a
new building and site amenities which will greatly improve the visual,
acoustic and olfactory effects by including improved parking designed
primarily within the foot print of the building, trash retention within the
confines of the building with roll out only on the days of service and
provides for significant enhancement to the green space on the site with
established yards and landscaping to further provide minimization of ill
effects on the surrounding properties. r?
OCT 0 6 2005
685 and 689 Bay Esplanade - Bay Esplanade
NES Project # 0532
ORIGINAL
0
Flexibility Criteria (Section 2-803 (B)) UU OCT 0 6 200,,,
Attached dwellings PLAN ING ? r ; i4.OpMF
iY? r?NM r
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out o
scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development
Response: No deviations to lot area and width requested.
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to
an arterial street
Response: The proposed access to the site does not involve direct access to an arterial street.
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance
Response: The minimal additional height requested is within the lower limits of the flexible
development standards and will provide for better articulation of the architectural design of the
proposed building. Additionally, mitigation of the requested height is achieved by providing
varying building elements (such as balconies, and decorative overhangs), stepbacks and a
beautiful mixture of materials.
b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the
ground floor of the residential building
Response: The proposed design provides the majority of the parking within the footprint of
the building as desired by the Community Development Code and the Beach by Design program.,
some guest parking will be located outside of footprint as would any guest parking for a
residential structure.
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life
Response: In the front yard adjacent to Bay Esplanade, a decorative water feature is
proposed for the west elevation of the building.. The tranquil water feature will provide acoustic
and visual enhancement as well as providing additional interest to the building elevation.
b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and
appearance
NI
vyCs,
Response: Although the north portion of the site is also legally considered a front yard, the
site design provides for vehicular access via Somerset providing a higher quality environment on
the west elevation adjacent to Bay Esplanade.
0 0 ORIGINAL
c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by
emergency vehicles
Response: The proposed design will meet or exceed the Fire code requirements.
d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient
parking or improved design and appearance
Response: The proposed development provides a few more parking spaces then required by
code to better serve the community by providing guest parking. The development provides a
building design and materials with interest and appeal as well as establishing green spaces with
well landscaped yards.
5. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the
property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of
significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes
or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to
dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation
Response: No parking deviation requested.
b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed
to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a
residential building without parking on the ground level
Response: Much like a residential building, the proposed site design provides for all tenant
parking within the footprint of the building with one space being provided outside the building
footprint for guest parking. This occurrence is quite normal for any residence and will provide
on-site parking for guests or overflow without requiring street parking within the residential
community. Additionally, all facades of the building will be finished and contain architectural
features.
6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5
of Article 3
Response: The Beach by Design program desires buildings of low to mid-rise height; the
proposed development is within the acceptable range of height for a mid-rise development and
will provide a smooth transition to the adjoining Medium High Density Residential District to the
North. Particular care has been taken through design and use to insure harmonious existence
with the adjoining residential properties by providing additional parking, developing less
dwelling units then allowed by code and creating a building that has visual interest and character.
Revised 10-04-05 rmr
685-689 Bay Esplanade NES #532
4
4T STREET (PINNA STREET - PLAT) -
I 500 500
<,. M
1
W
V ,
r
sl m
I
}
r
+ ' I -)
t4
}+ ?1
}
I
... . .
+
?
'? . ? +
I +?-
1
f I
O0 }
} + ?? 1'Urr
+ I 1
s . • . , 1 1
i
?++ 1
I
L
? 11 ? 1
..
110c5•.nYm'a 1108
'.• 23 w+?n
500'
4
I?
Q
CD
.4 1
,.I -}-
Oow
t+,
'k, z
? Y '?? ? ? ?''• ? - ? j fug j`_' `
8
krl
t ; ` ?I tl ? ? b
Ell.
,-' •` _ i1
p?'Sx? ?r I\? \
LwH+`
?X
r
iT ?l
+ J 4 ??•?
• h ,
w.
L
a "*c
OCT 0 6 20M.
uKUIVAL
AUDE
SHAND&
WILLIAMS
AIA
Ruben 1. Aube, AU
Pt--
pi
EAST ELEVATION
693 A 699 NORTH PROPERTY 665 A 669 60UTH PROPERTY
WEST ELEVATION
L J
Ae 6RYi6s?r 6u
665 A 66960IIf9 PROPEM 693 A 699 NORTH PROP W
4ti 'IV,,
• !?
(PIKIAIA CTPPPT _ PI ATl
t
1
t
Fx??
1
i
1
ORIGINAL
W RETENTIONPOND
TOP EL. 4.4
BOT. EL. 2.4
OCT06200.
y
n,
ORIGNAL
Ea.
t hoar Mrs •_
_? uulRY '?.?,wrouE / so?erm ?? _ E ?? ~- w
,€>
r
swo K,Erow
SOUTH ELEVATION
? ?z•-r.o"
NORTH ELEVATION
-Fr?F1 I1
^o
I
C"
tta
c;:=
b
b
b
b
AUDE
SHAND a
WILLIAMS
ALA
u?
-1 . Au -
•
MTL
row r
rwnE" ? r?s.t?wc ? i pim?imc[?mu,
yEa4
EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION
ORIGINAL
AUDE
SHAND&
WILLIAMS
AIA
17
•
; _? E
z
m
C t-
U
Y
C"
T- C
s
I ST & 2ND FLOOR PLANS TYPICAL
SCALE: Y16' - -
2227 SC. FT BALCONY AREA
338 SO. FT
AUDE
SHAND&
WILLIAMS
AIA
•
0
3RD FLOOR PLAN
2227 SO. FT BALCONY AREA
338 SQ. FT
ORIGINAL
AUDE
SHANDa
WILLIAMS
AIA
?n ?. ?aa nu
^Q
4
O
cr)
1
4TH FLOOR PLAN
0
WTL
ZZZ/ SO. hl BALCONY AREA
338 SO FT
This Warranty. Deed
Made this 8th day of April, 2003 by
JEANNE HOPKINS, AN UNREMARRIED WIDOW
hereinafter called the grantor, to
EPIC HOLDINGS SOUTH, LLC, a Florida limited
liability company
whose post office address is
139 BAYSIDE DRIVE
CLEARWATER BEACH, FL 33767
hereinafter called the grantee:
(Whenever used herein the term "grantor' and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and
assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations)
Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is
hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land
situate in PINELLAS County, Florida, viz:
LOT 12 AND THE NORTH 5 FEET OF LOT 11, BLOCK 77, OF MANDALAY UNIT #5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE(S) 27, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
Subject to covenants, restrictions, easements of record and taxes for the current year.
Parcel Identification Number: 05-29-15-54756-077-0120
Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining.
To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever.
And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has
good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the
same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent
to December 31, 2002
. in Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:
I,
OCT0fi200:
d4?-,
ess (Signature)
tName: ,lncanh I Arhnur
Witness: (Sig ature)
Print Name: Margaret A. Mehol ick
KARLEEN E. DE DLAKER, CLERK OF COURT
PINELLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA
-----------------------------
N2060'934 04-162003 13:57:18 S 1M
51. DED-EPIC HOLDINGS
000000
1D:0315225,, DK:12676 SPG:0642 EP66:V4
RECORDING 001 PAGES 1 $6.0C
DOC STAMP - DR21ri 3 $2,641.011C
TOTAL: $21647.50
CHECK AMT. TENDERED: $2.647.80
CHANGE: $.00
DY DEPUTY CLERK
03-152253 RPR-16-2003 1:56pn
PINELLRS CO SK 12676 Pa 642
Y\ WAZIZ41?
JEANNE HOPKINS
1 KENSEYAVENUE
KENMORE, NY 14217
ORIGINAL
State of NEW YORK
County of Fri p
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Jnd day of April, 2003, by
JEANNE HOPKINS, AN UNREMARRIED WIDOW,
who Is personally known tome or who has produced driver's 1 1 Cerise as identification.
ics OT Y PUBLIC (signature)
Tint ame:
JOSEPH L. ARBOUR
PAGES
.
My Commission Expires: Slat/o?WT PUBLIC, SIATEOFNENIYORK
StamplSeal: AEC UALIREDINNIAGARACOUNTY
t mlWon ExpimMay3f,.AaR 3
DR219
.
DS U
Prepared by and Returned to: iR9T
Donna Fonnotto
?
Central Florida Title Company -
MTF Remird and Return f0:
3474 Tampa Road
Palm Harbor, FL 34684 Pic Centra) Florida Tdo Co.
File Number: 836030058 REV 1871 Lee Road
Re no.: nter Park, FL. 32789 241
AL, Wi
TOT
S
RAL
Incident to the issuance of a title Insurance contract,
Warrantydeed
Rev, 01/3112003
It
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION ORIGINAL
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with Northside
Engineering Services, Inc, to act as an agent for 1?.-Af's"?<"'>
and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at
, lying within
Address of
County, State of Ror l
Print Name of Property Owner
Telephone Number
State of I- The foregoing instrument wp acknowl dge before me this -2-& day
County of of .. , i?9 , by as
who Is ersonally known to m or who has produced
as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF FLORIDA
G?nthia N. Marden
CommWon # DD449308
W I
EIPIM: JULY 10, 2009 0 I --- Notary Public
Rwuied'!'htu AUanUc Kcuicling c:u., i
Si n ture)
Commission
(SEAL ABOVE) ?tn c_ _ _ (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped)
_'2? UL-
OCT 0 6 2005,
FILE
City/State/Zip Code
Prepared by and return to
D DECKER KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF Col
PAN AMERICAN TITLE CO! PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA
8220 N. IIANLEY RD. INSTn 2003515697 12/0912003 at 04:26 PM
OFF REC Bit: 13254 PG: 436431
j TAMPA, FL 33634 { Doct"ype:DEEU RECORDING: $10.50
t? I
i
1 1j THIS WARRANTY DEED made this `a-?6day of NOVEMBER, 2003 BY
1 J? _
JAN JUREWICZ AND JANE JUREWI Z; HUSBAiv'Ii & WIFE _
t WHOSE MAILING ADDRESS IS: 4 ? ercv? OP0-,ZI-E fS {7 - ?} Q
Hereinafter called the Grantors, j
3 to PETER PAN DEVELOPMENTS
• whose mailing address is: I (U h >? n a Y ?h ?( u ly.2 6c t+-I f
hereinafter called the Grantees,
I WITNESSETH: that the grantors, for. an in consideration of tite sum of Tell and 00/100 Dollars
($10,00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, here by grants,
bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releasies, conveys and confirms auto the grantee all that certain land situate
s in Pinellas COUNTY, FLORIDA, to wit;
i
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" (PARCEL #05/29/15/54756/077/0130
TINS DEED 1S TO CONSUR'IMATP THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT FOR DEED BETWEEN IN THAT.
t CERTAIN AGREEMENT FOR DEL, b RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 4955, PAGE 1541 AND THEREAFTER
ASSIGNED IN O.R. BOOR: 8538,PAGE 1205 wrrH CONSENT IN O.R. BOOK 8538,PAGE 1216 AND
EXTENSION IN O.R. BOOK 11970,PAGE 24, AND CONDITINAL ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT FOR
DEED IN O.R. BOOK 8437,PAb E' 1112, ALL IN TILE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS
f COUNTY,FLORIDA. .
TOGETHER with all the tenements( hereditaments, and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise
appertaining. `
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever.
AND, the grantors hereby co.e:lant with said grantees that the grantors is/are lawfully seized of said land
In fee simple; that the grantors have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and
f. hereby warrant the title to said land and will defend. the same against the lawful claims of all persons
whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December
31, 2003, any easements, restrictions; reservations of record,
IN WITNESS WHERE, OF, the said grantors have signed and sealed these presents the day and year
first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of
Witness
• i.
t1 •?
Witness
,4P oP
J9/W1U7 ICZ
STATE OF it±iNQIS " " V---
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument wasackllowledged before the this DAY OF
2003 BY JAN JUREWICZ ACID JANE JUREWICZ
who is/are personally knowne-or-has produced a driver's license as identification
and did not take an oath.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Notary Public State of FLORIDA.
COUNTY OF DECKER
p. June 9, 2004
my ronsre. ax
° comm;ssion No. nCC944836
ORIGINAL
Northside
5"4" sm-taa 10C.
CIVIL •
LAND PLANNING •
ENVIRONMENTAL •
TRANSPORTATION •
STORMWATER REPORT
FOR: ORIGINAL
685 BA Y ESPLANADE
PROJECT
oCTOS? ID
.T V.
O _
Ram A. GoeZ - a'T3.,zP.E`?#4fi31',
October, 2005
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 Project No. 0532
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MI N DS PRI NG.COM
727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036
U
ORIGINAL
685 BAY ESPLANADE DRAINAGE NARRATIVE
The proposed project is located in Clearwater, Florida (Section 5, Township 29
south, Range 15 east) at 685 Bay Esplanade Road. The project consists of the
redevelopment of 13,622sf of property and will include the construction of eight
condominium units with associated infrastructure improvements such as
roadways, utilities, stormwater detention facility and landscaping.
The existing site contains 7,289 sf of impervious and 6,333 sf of open space.
The proposed site will contain 8,521 sf of impervious and 5,101 sf of open space.
Discharge will be directly into open Florida waters and quantity runoff will be
discharged through an overflow in the detention pond control structure. For
water quality purposes 1/2" quality treatment volume equal to 586 cf will be
provided. Recovery of this volume will be within 21.7 hours through 10' of
underdrain.
MD
T
06200:
FOC
PLANNING & QEVELOPME N'r v'?ICS
Illf F" LEf?.r?tn'i"TL9
0
PROJECT NAME :
PROJECT NO.:
STAGE STORAGE DATA :
T.O.B. EL.=
W.Q. EL.=
BOTTOM EL.=
685 Bay Esplanade
0532
ORIGINAL
STAGE
ft-NGVD AREA
SF AREA
AC STORAGE
CF
4.40 911 0.021 989
3.90 703 0.016 586
3.00 328 0.008 122
2.90 286 0.007 91
2.80 245 0.006 65
2.70 203 0.005 42
2.60 161 0.004 24
2.50 120 0.003 10
2.40 78 0.002 0
WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
DRAINAGE AREA =
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME _
PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY =
OCT 0 6 2005
PLANNING & VELOPMENTEVC8
......Se.ITY CLEARWATE,8
•
13,622 SF
0.50 IN
568 CF
3.90 FT
586 CF
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
PROJECT: 685 Bay Esplanade
PROJECT NO.: 532
VOLUME PROVIDED = 586 C.F.
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 3.90
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 2.40
UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 1.73
K = 0.09 FT/MIN
LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 10 FT
SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 4 INCH
POND AREA (SF) =
POND AREA (SF) =
ORIGINAL
703 S.F.
78 S.F.
ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HG FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME
FT FT FT FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN.
3.90 703
1.81 0.38 2.75 0.66 10 0.62 234 377
3.53 547
1.44 0.38 2.75 0.52 10 0.49 176 357
3.15 391,
1.06 0.38 2.75 0.39 10 0.36 117 322
2.78 234
0.69 0.38 2.75 0.25 10 0.24 59 249
2.40 78
TIME= 1,305 MINUTES
TIME = 21.7 HOURS
• 0
ORIGINAL
October 5, 2005
Kathryn Ziola
Epic Holdings South, LLC
139 Bayside Drive
Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767
Reference: 685 Bay Esplanade
Subject: Maintenance and Operation of the Retention Basin
Dear Ms. Ziola:
Per the rules and regulations of the Southwest Florida Water Management
District, we are required to furnish you with a set of instructions for
maintenance and operation of the retention basin.
The retention basin is designed to maintain certain volumes of rainfall runoff
corresponding to specific water elevations.
The control structure regulates the level of the water in the basin. The volume
above the slot should be discharged under a grease skimmer and through the
slot within a few hours following a storm event. The volume below the slot
should take less than 24 hours to be discharged through filtration
underdrains. The water level in the basin should drop approximately 1' below
the slot within 24 hours following a storm event assuming there is no
interceding rainfall.
Here are some suggested procedures to keep the system functional:
• Grass clippings and other vegetative debris should be removed
from the area surrounding the basin.
• The area immediately in front of the control structure should
be cleared of aquatic growth.
• Limit fertilizer use around the pond area to prevent nutrient
loading of the facility. nn 1E --
U
OCT06200r
PLANNI-
N & VEL PM 6tN4 6VCSi
C1 LEA I
0
0
ORIGINAL
• The control structure should be checked monthly and all
debris cleared.
• Your Management of Surface Water Permit should contain a
number of conditions which must be met.
If you have any question, please do not hesitate to call
Sincerely,
`i? grtbside"Eggineerin g Services, Inc.
y? r //•
"`J a
Ism '.E.
Senior
",;-**-North ?i g Services, Inc
'`'? 601CIe Suite 930
Clearw. 3755
?j ocr 0 6 2005
I
M 114T
b OE)
FLD2005-08088
685 BAY ESPLANADE
Date Received: 08/25/2005
BAY ESPLANADE CONDOS
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 258A
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
CLWCoverSheet
•
ORIGINAL
FLD2005-08088
685 BAY ESPLANADE ?p
1A.l.'6252005
Date Received: 08/25/2005 -
BAY ESPLANADE CONDOS
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 258A
PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED
CLWCoverSheet
Page 1 of 1
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 4:33 PM
To: 'Renee Ruggiero'
Subject: North and South Somerset Projects
Renee -
FLD2005-08088 for 685-689 Bay Esplanade was originally approved by the Community Development Board
(CDB) on November 15, 2005. A six-month time extension to May 15, 2007, was granted by the Planning
Director by letter dated September 7, 2006. On April 17, 2007, the CDB granted a one-year time extension to
May 15, 2008.
FLD2005-08090 for 693-699 Bay Esplanade was originally approved by the CDB on January 17, 2006. A four-
month time extension to May 17, 2007, was granted by the Planning Director by letter dated December 1, 2007.
On April 17, 2007, the CDB granted a one-year time extension to May 17, 2008.
Unfortunately, there are no additional time extensions available or permissible. With both projects, unless
building permit applications are submitted to construct the proposed projects by the above time frames in May,
the prior approvals will lapse and become void. The Development Orders for both time extensions by the CDB
included the following statement: "Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the
improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in
accordance.with the requirements of the Community Development Code."
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:renee@northsideengineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 3:26 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: North and South Somerset Projects
Good afternoon Wayne,
The North and South Somerset projects I believe are ready to expire in May.
Would you be able to check to see if there is the ability to request one additional year or six month
extension on them (the response may be different for each)?
Obviously, with the economy everyone is begging and praying for additional time.
Thank you and hope all is well ..... miss you - R
Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner
Horthside Engineering Services, Inc.
300 Belcher Road
Clearwater, FL 33756
T 727.443.2869 / F727.446.8036
2/28/2008
1 Si !
Wells, Wayne
From: Katie Cole [Katiec@jpfirm.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 6:31 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Kurleman, Scott
Subject: Re: FLD2005-08090, 693-699 Bay Esplanade
Thank you. I didn't have the information on both cases. I appreciate the summary and
fully understand the impact to the dock DO.
Katie
Sent from my B1ackBerry Wireless Handheld
----- Original message -----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>
To: Katie Cole
Cc: michael.delk@MyClearwater.com <michael.delk@MyClearwater.com>;
Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com <Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com>;
neil.thompson@MyClearwater.com <neil.thompson@MyClearwater.com>;
Scott.Kurleman@myClearwater.com <Scott.Kurleman@myClearwater.com>
Sent: Thu Dec 20 17:53:28 2007
Subject: FLD2005-08090, 693-699 Bay Esplanade
Katie -
Case No FLD2005-08090 for the property at 693 - 699 Bay Esplanade was originally approved
by the CDB on January 17, 2006. The Development Order gave until January 17, 2007, to
submit for building permits to construct the improvements. On December 1, 2006, a four-
month time extension to May 17, 2007, was granted by the Planning Director. On April 17,
2007, the CDB granted a one-year time extension to May 17, 2008, to submit for building
permits to construct the improvements. This was the final time extension available under
the Code. Either the applicant must submit building plans to the City to construct the
improvements by May 17, 2008, or the Development Order will expire and be void.
The companion project approved under Case No. FLD2005-08088 for the property at 685 - 689
Bay Esplanade was originally approved by the CDB on November 15, 2005. The Development
order gave until November 15, 2006, to submit for building permits to construct the
improvements. On September 7, 2006, a six-month time extension to May 15, 2007, was
granted by the Planning Director. On April 17, 2007, the CDB granted a one-year time
extension to May 15, 2008, to submit for building permits to construct the improvements.
This also was the final time extension available under the Code for this project. Either
the applicant must submit building plans to the City to construct the improvements by May
15, 2008, or the Development order will also expire and be void.
In both projects, should the Development Orders expire and become void, any future
development proposal for either property must comply with current Code and Beach by Design
provisions.
It should be noted that the docks that were just approved by the CDB for these properties
are accessory uses to the primary, upland use of attached dwellings and, as accessory
uses, are contingent upon the submission of permits to construct the upland attached
dwellings.
Should you have any further questions, feel free to contact me.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Cole [mailto:Katiec@jpfirm.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 3:35 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FLD2005-08090
Wayne -
I am looking for final deadlines of the development order for Case no. FLD2005-
08090. In my records, I have that the DO will expire on 5/17/2008. Is this correct? Is
this case eligible for another extension?
The companion case (FLD2005-08088) has already received one administrative
extension and one CDB extension so I would presume that building permits must be pulled by
5/15/08 with no option of extension.
Would you please confirm? This is the condo project that accompanies the Channel
Club docks (685, 687, 689 Bay Esplanade and 693, 699 Bay Esplanade).
Thank you! Our offices are closed through Dec. 25 but I am available via email
and by cell: 727-644-4921. Happy holidays.
Katie
Katherine E. Cole, Esquire
,.Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP
911 Chestnut St.
Clearwater, FL 33756
Tel: 727-461-1818
Fax: 727-462-0365
2
fig;
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF C LEARWA°TER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
April 18, 2007
Ms. Kathy Ziola
610 Mandalay Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33767
RE: FLD2005-08088 - 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade
Time Extension Development Order
Dear Ms. Ziola:
On April 17, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to
extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit to construct the site
improvements on your parcel at 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade shall be submitted by May 15, 2008.
All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance
of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be
unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above
referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the
requirements of the Community Development Code.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity
to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate
the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter
with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at
727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, AIC
Planning Director
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished Applications lBay Esplanade 685-689 Bay Esplanade Condos (7) -
ApprovedlBay Esplanade 685-689 CDB Time Extension Development Order 4.18.07.doc
FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR
JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER AIA CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
i
•
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 5:12 PM
To: 'tbziola@msn.com'
Cc: 'Hunraf@aol.com ; 'katiec@jpfirm.com'
Subject: Development Orders from the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting
Ms. Ziola -
Attached are the Development Orders for the Time Extensions for the following cases, where the Community
Development Board (CDB) took action at their meeting of April 17, 2007:
1. FLD2005-08088, 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade; and
2. FLD2005-08090, 693 - 699 Bay Esplanade.
The original letters are being mailed.
Wayne
Bay Esplanade Bay Esplanade
i85-689 CDB Time.393-699 CDB Time..
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 5:24 PM
To: 'tbziola@msn.com'
Cc: 'Hunraf@aol.com'; 'katiec@jpfirm.com'
Subject: Staff Reports for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting
Ms. Ziola -
Attached are the Staff Reports for the time extensions for the April 17, 2007, CDB meeting for the following cases:
1. FLD2005-08088, 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade; and
2. FLD2005-08090, 693 - 699 Bay Esplanade.
These two cases are being placed on the consent agenda for this meeting.
Wayne
L--J "INN
Bay Esplanade Bay Esplanade
685-689 Time Ext...693-699 Time Ext...
0 • Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 4:49 PM
To: 'Hunraf@aol.com'
Cc: katiec@jpfirm.com
Subject: FLD2005-08088, 685-689 Bay Esplanade
Yes, the time extension is on the consent portion of the agenda.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 3:04 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: katiec@jpfirm.com
Subject: Joe Burdette - Again
Wayne
The time extension would also include 685-689 Bay Esplanade FLD2005-08088. Is that on the
consent agenda also.
Joe
See what's free at AOL.com.
4/11/2007
• • Page 1 of 2
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 2:30 PM
To: Delk, Michael; 'Hunraf@aol.com'
Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Extension Request
Michael/Joe -
Yes, I am in receipt of the time extension requests. Both requests have been added to the April 17,
2005, CDB agenda. The memorandums being sent to the CDB follow a format and a copy of each is
attached. We will not be adding in the information requested, as others cases in a similar situation
have not been so noted.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Delk, Michael
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 2:01 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: Joe Burdette - Extension Request
Wayne - Do you know the answer?
mld
-----Original Message-----
From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 6:10 PM
To: Delk, Michael
Subject: Joe Burdette - Extension Request
Michael
An extension request was dropped off to you last week by the developers of 693-699 Bay
Esplanade and 685-689 Bay Esplanade (FLD2005-08090 and FLD2005-08088).
I was not a part of the original approval of this project. I am told by the owners that they did not
use any conversion from hotel to condominium to obtain their density and, if that is a fact,
would ask that you include that in the staff report that goes to the CDB members prior to the
April meeting as that is a substantial difference between this project and the ones we just
received extensions on in February.
If that is not a fact, please notify me right away so I can talk to the owners.
Thanks as usual
Joe
3/19/2007
va 0 0 Page 2 of 2
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
3/19/2007
E
•
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
Somerset Inc MAR 14 2007.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
61o AandaCay .Ave CITY OF CLEARwATER
Clearwater Fl 33767
Re: FLD2005-08088-685-689 Bay Esplanade and FLD2005-08090-693-699 Bay
Esplanade
Dear Mr. Delk
Please accept this letter as our request for a 1-year extension for the above referenced two
(2) Development Orders for our projects on Clearwater Beach and to have this request
placed on the April 17, 2007 Community Development Board Agenda.
This request is based on the land development code section 4.04 and the specific criteria
for our request is as follows:
1. We are in the process of pre-sales and market conditions have been slow.
Construction lenders' have increased the number of pre-sales required to fund
construction loans and this has hampered us as well.
2. Increase in construction costs have forced us to redo some of our architectural
construction drawings in order to keep our costs in line while still maintaining our
commitment to a quality product.
3. Dock sales are an integral part of our marketing plan and we are still awaiting
permitting for them.
Should you require any additional information, please contact me and I will see that you
receive whatever information you may require.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
IKby , Secretary
e G2?G? i
*5-IV
G'O?y
?ivision of Corporations Page 1 of 2
zlf?rxal?strulrr,-,r?r;? ?'?1bl?.C I?,?.qu?°
Florida Limited Liability
EPIC HOLDINGS SOUTH, LLC
PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
139 BAYSIDE DR.
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
MAILING ADDRESS
139 BAYSIDE DR.
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
Document Number FEI Number Date Filed
L03000013295 861050936 04/14/2003
State Status Effective Date
FL ACTIVE NONE
Total Contribution
0.00
Registered Agent
Name & Address 1
ZIOLA, THOMAS
139 BAYSIDE DR.
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
Manager/Member Detail
Titl
e
Name & Address
ZIOLA, THOMAS
139 BAYSIDE DR. FRES
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
Annual
11 Report Year II Filed Date II
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al =DETFIL&nl =LO3000013295&n2=NAMFW... 3/19/2007
PPP- division of Corporations
• • Page 2 of 2
Previous Filing Return to List Next Filing
No Events
No Name History Information
Document Images
Listed below are the images available for this filing.
THIS 3EE DOCL ?T
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n1=L03000013295&n2=NAMFW... 3/19/2007
division of Corporations • Page 1 of 2
.'U x'14
21?zr?l?,sltlrlri./lr'ukl1 IRqtxx>
Florida Limited Liability
PETER PAN DEVELOPMENTS LLC
PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
5210 WEBB ROAD
TAMPA FL 33615
Changed 04/11/2006
MAILING ADDRESS
5210 WEBB ROAD
TAMPA FL 33615
Changed 04/11/2006
Document Number FEI Number Date Filed
L03000045378 200711485 11/18/2003
State Status Effective Date
FL ACTIVE NONE
Last Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date
AMENDED AND 06/17/2004 NONE
RESTATED ARTICLES
Total Contribution
0.00
Registered Agent
Name & Address
VASILOUDES, PANOS
5210 WEBB ROAD
TAMPA FL 33615
Name Changed: 04/22/2005
Address Changed: 04/11/2006
Manager/Member Detail
I Name & Address . Title I
MEROLI, PETRIT
http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n1=LO3000045378&n2=NAMFW... 3/19/2007
•- 10 ivision of Corporations
• Page 2 of 2
610 MANDALAY AVENUE MGRM
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
lu
VASILOUDES, PANOS
5210 WEBB ROAD MGRM
TAMPA FL 33615
Annual Reports
Report Year Filed Date
2004 04/19/2004
2005 04/22/2005
2006 04/ 11 /2006
Previous Filing Return to List Next Filing
No Name History Information
Document Images
Listed below are the images available for this filing.
THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT
Coxpc ra ivrt Inquiry ? Corporations Help
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n1=LO3000045378&n2=NAMFW... 3/19/2007
Pinellas County Property Ap er Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 0? Page 2 of 5
05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 077 / 0120
19-Mar-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:49:32
Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales
EPIC HOLDINGS SOUTH OBK: 12676 OPG: 0642
139 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767-2502
EVAC: A EUAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 685 BAY ESPLANADE
of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02
sales from 2004 - 2005:
1,283,100 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 4 /2,003 12,6761 642 377,400 (0) I
1929: Book 020 Pgs 048- 0 11,967 2,5751 462 2,450 (U) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { )
2006 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 1,086,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000
Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 1,086,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000
Historic Exem: 0
Taxable: 1,086,000 Agricultural: 0
2006 Tax Information
District: Cu Seawall: YES Frontage: Bay
Clearwater View:
06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
06 Taxes: 23, 635. 70
1) 64 x 110 175. 00 6,918. 92 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
23, 635.70 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
Without any exemptions,
2006 taxes will be
23,635. 70
Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 77, LOT 12 AS DESC IN
Description PL 20 P6 27 & H 5FT OF LOT 11
Building Information
http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=05... 3/19/2007
Pinellas County Property Ap"Wer Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 Of
Page 3 of 5
Pro pert y and Land Use Code descriptions
05 / / 29 / 15 / 54750 1 077 1 0120 :01
19-Mar-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:49:32
Residential Card 01 of i Prop Use: 220 Land Use: 08 Living Units: 2
Imp Type: Duplex/Triplex Prop Address: 685 BAY ESPLANADE
Structural E1?m?nts
Foundation Continuous Wall Quality Average
Floor System Slab on Grade Year Built 11951
Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco/Reclad Effective Age 35
Roof Frame Flat-Shed Heating Unit/Spc/W1/F1 Furn
Roof Cover B U Tar&Gravel/Othr Cooling None
Fixtures 6
# Stories 1.0 Other Depreciation 0
Floor Finish Crpt/Unyl/SftWd/Terr Functional Depreciation 0
Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster Econonomic Depreciation 0
Sub Aromas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1.00 1,434 7) .00 0
2) Open Porch .20 220 8) .00 0
3) Detached Garage .35 288 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
R c S 1 d s nt 1 a1 E x t r a F c at ur c s
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) DOCK 168 40.00 168 6,720 3,900 1,951
2) PATIO/DECK 12.00 176 21110 840 1,951
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 4,740
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
F*_1 R Fit] T R Fq
http://136.174.187.131htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=05... 3/19/2007
Pinellas County Property Ap*r Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 010
STREET
7 49 51 S9
C1 CACI C}TI . CACI AC IA
5A 60a N Ipp
E7 DAN
S PNA.
-1 174
r
SPLANAD
DAY
`SPL AI~1A0
4YP D
SPLANAD
332.8 5
22.73
JE S
PLFILANA.D
rn v LPL CAD fcst
U1
fn
r
673
BAY
SPLLANAD
27942
L_
J
Page 4 of 5
77
S
PA1AD
- PY
85- 657 563 6g6? ? v
.'..l N FFAN .
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr.3.?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=05... 3/19/2007
13373, 'STREET
Pinellas County Property Ap er Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 Page 5 of 5
Back to Search Page
An explanation of this screen
http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=05... 3/19/2007
11inellas County Property Ap er Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 Page 2 of 6
05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 077 / 0130
19-Mar-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:50:06
Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales
PETER PAN DEU OBK: 13254 OPG: 0430
610 MANDALAY HE
CLEARWATER FL 33767-1632
EVAC: A EUAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 689 BAY ESPLANADE
of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02
sales from 2004 - 2005:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 12/2,003 13,254/ 430 1,250,000 (Q) I
1929: Book 020 Pgs 048- 3 /1,994 8,5951 350 225,000 (U) I
0000: Book Pgs - 1 /1,994 8,538/1,205 420,000 (C) I
0000: Book Pgs - 6 /1,992 7,952/1,947 370,000 (C) I
2006 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 963,200 Homestead: NO Ownership .000
Govt Exem: NO Use %: .250
Assessed/Cap: 963,200 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000
Historic Exem: 0
Taxable: 963,200 Agricultural: 0
2006 Tax Information
District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Bay
Clearwater view:
06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
06 Taxes: 20,963.08
1} 60 x 110 200. 00 6,475.42 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
20, 963.08 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exemptions,
2006 taxes will be
20,963. 08
Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 77, LOT 13 AS DESC IN
Description PL 20 PG 27
Building Information
http://136.174.187.131htbinlcgi-click?o=l &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 3/19/2007
Anellas County Property Ap er Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 010 Page 3 of 6
. Buildin?._1
. Building 2
Building #1
05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / OTT / 0130 :01
i9-Mar-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:50:06
Commercial Card 01 of 2 Improvement Type: Mult Res Apt C4 St
Property Address: 689 BAY ESPLANADE Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39
Structural E1em?nts
Foundation Continuous Footing
Floor System Wood W/ Subfloor
Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco
Height Factor 0
Party Wall None
Structural Frame None
Roof Frame Flat
Roof Cover Built Up/Composition
Cabinet & Mill Average
Floor Finish Carpet Combination
Interior Finish Plaster Furred
Total Units 13
Heating & Air Unit Heater
Fixtures 33
Bath Tile Floor and Wall
Electric Average
Shape Factor Rectangle
Quality Average
Year Built 1,951
Effective Age 30
Other Depreciation 0
Function Depreciation 0
Economic Depreciation 0
Sul3 ArcaEm-
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1.00 2,470 7) .00 0
2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 2,170 8) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) 00 0 12) .00 0
Commcr4-1a1 E tra Fcatures
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 7X200 1.75 1,400 2,450 2,450 999
2) PATIO/DECK 434 24.00 434 10,420 4,170 1,970
3) DOCK 344 SF 25.00 344 8,600 3,440 1,970
4) PATIO/DECK 475SF 6.00 475 21850 1,140 1,970
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 11,200
Building #2
. http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=l&a=l&b=1&c=1&r=.16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p=0... 3/19/2007
T,
Pnellas County Property Appoer Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 00 Page 4 of 6
05 / 2 / 15 / 54756 / 077 / 0130 :02
19-Mar-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:50:06
Commercial Card 02 of 2 Improvement Type: Hotels Res Const
Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39
Structural E1?m?nts
Foundation Continuous Footing
Floor System Slab on Grade
Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco
Height Factor 0
Party Wall Hone
Structural Frame Hone
Roof Frame Flat
Roof Cover Built Up/Composition
Cabinet & Mill Average
Floor Finish Carpet Combination
Interior Finish Paneling Average
Total Units 0
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 3
Bath Tile Hone
Electric Average
Shape Factor Rectangle
Quality Average
Year Built 1,951
Effective Age 30
Other Depreciation 0
Function Depreciation 0
Economic Depreciation 0
Sub AroBas
Description Factor Area , Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1.00 288 7) .00 0
2) Open Porch .15 30 8) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Commercial E>ctra FE3 aturE3 Em-
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) . 00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
F* RIf I Tr MR
http://136.174.187..13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=I &u=0&p=0... 3/19/2007
rnellas County Property ApVer Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 00
AC??`?IA. ST BAY D.
?SPEANAQ APL h?AD
STREET SPLANAD
PRYA.
S AC A
CI I
C C
LI CACI ACACIA
IA
i ST ST
ST
ST x
D
SPLANAD
g9J
7ET Oh?i $q ?RS T 692
A ? ESP At
ST SPL
NA
22.73
D
AD
i
I
1 SP 4.1ADI
673
5PLLANAD
332,85
1, 27942
Page 5 of 6
54 7 S G E??
ESPLANAD
555 665
PArv ?3 ?Bk`',_ s
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=I &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 3/19/2007
13373, STREET
Wnellas County Property Ap er Information: 05 29 15 54756 077
Page 6 of 6
http:// 136.1.74.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 3/19/2007
A
•
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 10:19 AM
To: Sherry Bagley (E-mail)
Subject: Bay Esplanade properties
Sherry -
•
Thought I would forward Mike Quillen's thoughts on the proposed boardwalk.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Quillen, Michael
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 10:14 AM
To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott
Cc: Morris, William D.; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael
Subject: FW: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
Page 1 of 2
I agree with Wayne's question about public use of the boardwalk. This looks more to me like closing off a street
end for use as a private dock facility.
Michael D. Quillen, P.E.
Director of Engineering
City of Clearwater
michael.quiRei-t@myclearwater.com
727-562-4743
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:28 PM
To: Quillen, Michael; Morris, William D.; Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil
Subject: FW: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
FYI - This is the forwarded email so you can see the attachments Sherry Bagley sent.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sherry Bagley [mailto:sbagley@woodsconsulting.org]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 11:22 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
Wayne,
I've been trying to get some clarification on the Unity of Title for the Tropicana properties. The attorney would like
to get it prepared but the condition does not specifically state what needs to be included in that Unity. Is it all the
properties or is it the Hotel lots with the water lots? We want to ensure we do it correctly.
Also, I have another project I am working on, on Bay Esplanade. I met with Bill Morris regarding it but they have
some special issues he felt you might be able to address. Somerset Drive ROW is between the two properties (4
lots in all, 2 on each side). They would like to construct two.docks (one on each property) which would face the
1/22/2007
At
•
•
ROW. The length of the dock they would like to propose would require a variance for length. The applicant
thought that the city might consider the entire shoreline, the two properties and the ROW, as the
waterfront/shoreline width to establish the setbacks. Our feeling is that the city would not support this but we
wanted to get you opinion. We feel that each property would use its own waterfront width to establish the
setbacks and that as they do not have ownership of the ROW it could not be used in the calculations.
Page 2 of 2
Additionally, they wanted to repair/replace the seawall along the entire length, the two properties and the ROW,
and create a parallel boardwalk along the city's ROW, open to the public, which would connect the two docks.
What issues do you see with this and do you have someone we could discuss the repair of the ROW seawall
with?
I have included a aerial view of the proposed dock. This is a very preliminary design but should give you an idea
of what they are looking to do. I would appreciate any comments you could provide.
Thanks,
Sherry Bagley
Woods Consulting
1714 CR 1, Suite 22
Dunedin, FL 34698
www.woodsconsulting.org.
Phone: 727-786-5747
Fax: 727-786-7479
1/22/2007
0
Wells, Wayne
From: Morris, William D.
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 10:30 AM
To: Quillen, Michael; Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott
Cc: Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael
Subject: Re: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
I'll be back in the office Thursday, the dock consultant Woods consulting caught me juat
before I left town and was working with the property owner building on both sides of the
Somerset ROW. The upland property builder is trying to configure it docks on either side
of Somersets extended property line. While they were doing the they were looking at having
to fix and recap some of the seawall. They were discussing the repair the seawall/cap as
needed at the end of Somerset and perhaps putting a bench there as a public amenity. They
had not made any decisions before I left but did want the cities concerns. I told them I
would meet with them when I got back and suggested the talk to Planning and Engineering.
Without a set of plans in front of me I can't comment past that, Bill M
Bill Morris
Marine & Aviation Director
City of Clearwater
--------------------------
Sent from my B1ackBerry Wireless Handheld
-----Original Message-----
From: Quillen, Michael
To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott
CC: Morris, William D.; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael
Sent: Mon Jan 22 10:13:48 2007
Subject: FW: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
I agree with Wayne's question about public use of the boardwalk. This looks more to me
like closing off a street end for use as a private dock facility.
Michael D. Quillen, P.E.
Director of Engineering
City of Clearwater
michael.quillen@myclearwater.com
727-562-4743
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:28 PM
To: Quillen, Michael; Morris, William D.; Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil
Subject: FW: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
FYI - This is the forwarded email so you can see the attachments Sherry Bagley sent.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sherry Bagley [mailto:sbagley@woodsconsulting.org]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 11:22 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
Wayne,
I've been trying to get some clarification on the Unity of Title for the Tropicana
properties. The attorney would like to get it prepared but the condition does not
specifically state what needs to be included in that Unity. Is it all the properties or
is it the Hotel lots with the water lots? We want to ensure we do it correctly.
1
i i
Also, I have another project I am working on, on Bay Esplanade. I met with Bill Morris
regarding it but they have some special issues he felt you might be able to address.
Somerset Drive ROW is between the two properties (4 lots in all, 2 on each side). They
would like to construct two docks (one on each property) which would face the ROW. The
length of the dock they would like to propose would require a variance for length. The
applicant thought that the city might consider the entire shoreline, the two properties
and the ROW, as the waterfront/shoreline width to establish the setbacks. Our feeling is
that the city would not support this but we wanted to get you opinion. We feel that each
property would use its own waterfront width to establish the setbacks and that as they do
not have ownership of the ROW it could not be used in the calculations.
Additionally, they wanted to repair/replace the seawall along the entire length, the two
properties and the ROW, and create a parallel boardwalk along the city's ROW, open to the
public, which would connect the two docks. What issues do you see with this and do you
have someone we could discuss the repair of the ROW seawall with?
•I have included a aerial view of the proposed dock. This is a very preliminary design but
should give you an idea of what they are looking to do. I would appreciate any comments
you could provide.
Thanks,
Sherry Bagley
Woods Consulting
1714 CR 1, Suite 22
Dunedin, FL 34698
www.woodsconsulting.org
Phone: 727-786-5747
Fax: 727-786-7479
2
I
Page 1 of 2
Wells, Wayne
From: Quillen, Michael
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 10:14 AM
To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott
Cc: Morris, William D.; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael
Subject: FW: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
I agree with Wayne's question about public use of the boardwalk. This looks more to me like closing off a street
end for use as a private dock facility.
Michael D. Quillen, P.E.
Director of Engineering
City of Clearwater
michaeI.q uillen@myclearwater. c om
727-562-4743
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:28 PM
To: Quillen, Michael; Morris, William D.; Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil
Subject: FW: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
FYI - This is the forwarded email so you can see the attachments Sherry Bagley sent.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sherry Bagley [mailto:sbagley@woodsconsulting.org]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 11:22 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Tropicana Resort Land Trust.
Wayne,
I've been trying to get some clarification on the Unity of Title for the Tropicana properties. The attorney would like
to get it prepared but the condition does not specifically state what needs to be included in that Unity. Is it all the
properties or is it the Hotel lots with the water lots? We want to ensure we do it correctly.
Also, I have another project I am working on, on Bay Esplanade. I met with Bill Morris regarding it but they have
some special issues he felt you might be able to address. Somerset Drive ROW is between the two properties (4
lots in all, 2 on each side). They would like to construct two docks (one on each property) which would face the
ROW. The length of the dock-they would like to propose would require a variance for length. The applicant
thought that the city might consider the entire shoreline, the two properties and the ROW, as the
waterfront/shoreline width to establish the setbacks. Our feeling is that the city would not support this but we
wanted to get you opinion. We feel that each property would use its own waterfront width to establish the
setbacks and that as they do not have ownership of the ROW it could not be used in the calculations.
Additionally, they wanted to repair/replace the seawall along the entire length, the two properties and the ROW,
and create a parallel boardwalk along the city's ROW, open to the public, which would connect the,two docks.
What issues do you see with this and do you have someone we could discuss the repair of the ROW seawall
with?
I have included a aerial view of the proposed dock. This is a very preliminary design but should give you an idea
1/22/2007
IN
u
0 Page 2 of 2
of what they are looking to do. I would appreciate any comments you could provide.
Thanks,
Sherry Bagley
Woods Consulting
1714 CR 1, Suite 22
Dunedin, FL 34698
www.woodsconsulting.org
Phone: 727-786-5747
Fax: 727-786-7479
1/22/2007
?` . ? • . Page 1 of 2
4
Wells, Wayne
From: Quillen, Michael
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 10:12 AM
To: 'Sherry Bagley'
Cc: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott; Bahnick, Glen
Subject: RE: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
The City contact regarding seawall repair will be Glen Bahnick, Ass't. Director of Engineering, 562-4760.
Michael D. Quillen, P.E.
Director of Engineering
City of Clearwater
m.ichael.quillen@myclearwater.com
727-562-4743
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:25 PM
To: 'Sherry Bagley'
Cc: Quillen, Michael; Morris, William D.; Thompson, Neil; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael
Subject: RE: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
Sherry -
1. Hamden properties - The Unity of Title should be with how the ownership is. There may need to be
more than one Unity of Title prepared (probably a total of three). I am attaching the Unity of Title form that
can be used for this. If you have any questions about filling it/them out, let me know.
2. Bay Esplanade properties - This Somerset Street right-of-way separates the two properties. The City's
right-of-way cannot be vacated by City Charter. Each side of Somerset Street must be.considered on its
own as to waterfront/shoreline width, setbacks, length, etc. and the width of Somerset Street cannot be
counted.
As to replacing the seawall at the end of Somerset Street as part of their project, I would suggest
contacting Mike Quillen, City Engineer (562-4743). You might also ask him regarding the installation of the
four-foot wide boardwalk adjacent to the seawall. However, why is it proposed? How will the public benefit
by this boardwalk? Or, is it primarily for the residents' benefit for the projects on either side of Somerset
Street?
In prior discussions with Bill Morris on other docks, I understand there is a rule of thumb to use on boat
maneuvering area that is 1.5 times the dock length. I see you are proposing docks 70 feet in length, but
with only 74.5 feet between the docks. Unclear if there is a navigation issue relative to "parking" the boats.
Section 3-601.C.3.h.i requires a minimum setback of one third of the waterfront property width on the north
side for the northern project, or a 40-foot setback. It does not appear that this is being met. Additionally,
am I reading your preliminary design to show a slip on the north side of the dock that is 30 feet wide by 100
feet in length? I am unclear what type/size of yachts are envisioned for these condos. Slips that are 70
feet in length seems extremely long. These slips are to be exclusively for the residents of the condos.
This is not a marina. It also appears there must be adequate water depth to have a slip 16 feet in width
and 70 feet in length directly adjacent to the seawall (?). It may also beg a question as to why 16 feet wide
but 70 feet in length - how many boats are anticipated in these slips? It also appears you will be asking for
side setback reduction for the northern project from the southern property line (Somerset Street right-of-
1/22/2007
? . • Page 2 of 2
way extended). With a waterfront property width of 120 feet, the maximum length by Code is 90 feet. The
proposal exceeds by more than twice this maximum length. It may be questionable whether the City will
support such a significant increase, especially with other properties to the south proposed for
redevelopment (with the assumption of new future docks) and for the northern project in relation to single
family to the north, as to whether a precedent is being set.
am going to forward your email to Mr. Quillen and Mr. Morris so they will have the benefit of seeing your
attachments.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Sherry Bagley [mailto:sbagley@woodsconsulting.org]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 11:22 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
Wayne,
I've been trying to get some clarification on the Unity of Title for the Tropicana properties. The
attorney would like to get it prepared but the condition does not specifically state what needs to-be
included in that Unity. Is it all the properties or is it the Hotel lots with the water lots? We want to
ensure we do it correctly.
Also, I have another project I am working on, on Bay Esplanade. I met with Bill Morris regarding it
but they have some special issues he felt you might be able to address. Somerset Drive ROW is
between the two properties (4 lots in all, 2 on each side). They would like to construct two docks
(one on each property) which would face the ROW. The length of the dock they would like to
propose would require a variance for length. The applicant thought that the city might consider the
entire shoreline, the two properties and the ROW, as the waterfront/shoreline width to establish the
setbacks. Our feeling is that the city would not support this but we wanted to get you opinion. We
feel that each property would use its own waterfront width to establish the setbacks and that as they
do not have ownership of the ROW it could not be used in the calculations.
Additionally, they wanted to repair/replace the seawall along the entire length, the two properties
and the ROW, and create a parallel boardwalk along the city's ROW, open to the public, which
would connect the two docks. What issues do you see with this and do you have someone we
could discuss the repair of the ROW seawall with?
I have included a aerial view of the proposed dock. This is a very preliminary design but should give
you an idea of what they are looking to do. I would appreciate any comments you could provide.
Thanks,
Sherry Bagley
Woods Consulting
1714 CR 1, Suite 22
Dunedin, FL 34698
www.woodsconsulting.org
Phone: 727-786-5747
Fax: 727-786-7479
1/22/2007
• . Page 1 of 2
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:25 PM
To: 'Sherry Bagley'
Cc: Quillen, Michael; Morris, William D.; Thompson, Neil; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael
Subject: RE: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
Sherry -
1. Hamden properties - The Unity of Title should be with how the ownership is. There may need to be more than
one Unity of Title prepared (probably a total of three). I am attaching the Unity of Title form that can be used for
this. If you have any questions about filling it/them out, let me know.
2. Bay Esplanade properties - This Somerset Street right-of-way separates the two properties. The City's right-of-
way cannot be vacated by City Charter. Each side of Somerset Street must be considered on its own as to
waterfront/shoreline width, setbacks, length, etc. and the width of Somerset Street cannot be counted.
As to replacing the seawall at the end of Somerset Street as part of their project, I would suggest contacting Mike
Quillen, City Engineer (562-4743). You might also ask him regarding the installation of the four-foot wide
boardwalk adjacent to the seawall. However, why is it proposed? How will the public benefit by this boardwalk?
Or, is it primarily for the residents' benefit for the projects on either side of Somerset Street?
In prior discussions with Bill Morris on other docks, I understand there is a rule of thumb to use on boat
maneuvering area that is 1.5 times the dock length. I see you are proposing docks 70 feet in length, but with only
74.5 feet between the docks. Unclear if there is a navigation issue relative to "parking" the boats.
Section 3-601.C.3.h.i requires a minimum setback of one third of the waterfront property width on the north side
for the northern project, or a 40-foot setback. It does not appear that this is being met. Additionally, am I reading
your preliminary design to show a slip on the north side of the dock that is 30 feet wide by 100 feet in length?
am unclear what type/size of yachts are envisioned for these condos. Slips that are 70 feet in length seems
extremely long. These slips are to be exclusively for the residents of the condos. This is not a marina. It also
appears there must be adequate water depth to have a slip 16 feet in width and 70 feet in length directly adjacent
to the seawall (?). It may also beg a question as to why 16 feet wide but 70 feet in length - how many boats are
anticipated in these slips? It also appears you will be asking for side setback reduction for the northern project
from the southern property line (Somerset Street right-of-way extended). With a waterfront property width of 120
feet, the maximum length by Code is 90 feet. The proposal exceeds by more than twice this maximum length. It
may be questionable whether the City will support such a significant increase, especially with other properties to
the south proposed for redevelopment (with the assumption of new future docks) and for the northern project in
relation to single family to the north, as to whether a precedent is being set.
I am going to forward your email to Mr. Quillen and Mr. Morris so they will have the benefit of seeing your
attachments.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Sherry Bagley [mailto:sbagley@woodsconsulting.org]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 11:22 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
Wayne,
I've been trying to get some clarification on the Unity of Title for the Tropicana properties. The attorney
1/19/2007
• • Page 2 of 2
would like to get it prepared but the condition does not specifically state what needs to be included in that
Unity. Is it all the properties or is it the Hotel lots with the water lots? We want to ensure we do it correctly.
Also, I have another project I am working on, on Bay Esplanade. I met with Bill Morris regarding it but they
have some special issues he felt you might be able to address. Somerset Drive ROW is between the two
properties (4 lots in all, 2 on each side). They would like to construct two docks (one on each property)
which would face the ROW. The length of the dock they would like to propose would require a variance for
length. The applicant thought that the city might consider the entire shoreline, the two properties and the
ROW, as the waterfront/shoreline width to establish the setbacks. Our feeling is that the city would not
support this but we wanted to get you opinion. We feel that each property would use its own waterfront
width to establish the setbacks and that as they do not have ownership of the ROW it could not be used in
the calculations.
Additionally, they wanted to repair/replace the seawall along the entire length, the two properties and the
ROW, and create a parallel boardwalk along the city's ROW, open to the public, which would connect the
two docks. What issues do you see with this and do you have someone we could discuss the repair of the
ROW seawall with?
I have included a aerial view of the proposed dock. This is a very preliminary design but should give you
an idea of what they are looking to do. I would appreciate any comments you could provide.
Thanks,
Sherry Bagley
Woods Consulting
1714 CR 1, Suite 22
Dunedin, FL 34698
www.woodsconsulting.org
Phone: 727-786-5747
Fax: 727-786-7479
1/19/2007
• • Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Sherry Bagley [sbagley@woodsconsulting.org]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 11:22 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Tropicana Resort Land Trust
Wayne,
I've been trying to get some clarification on the Unity of Title for the Tropicana properties. The attorney would like
to get it prepared but the condition does not specifically state what needs to be included in that Unity. Is it all the
properties or is it the Hotel lots with the water lots? We want to ensure we do it correctly.
Also, I have another project I am working on, on Bay Esplanade. I met with Bill Morris regarding it but they have
some special issues he felt you might be able to address. Somerset Drive ROW is between the two properties (4
lots in all, 2 on each side). They would like to construct two docks (one on each property) which would face the
ROW. The length of the dock they would like to propose would require a variance for length. The applicant
thought that the city might consider the entire shoreline, the two properties and the ROW, as the
waterfront/shoreline width to establish the setbacks. Our feeling is that the city would not support this but we
wanted to get you opinion. We feel that each property would use its own waterfront width to establish the
setbacks and that as they do not have ownership of the ROW it could not be used in the calculations.
Additionally, they wanted to repair/replace the seawall along the entire length, the two properties and the ROW,
and create a parallel boardwalk along the city's ROW, open to the public, which would connect the two docks.
What issues do you see with this and do you have someone we could discuss the repair of the ROW seawall
with?
I have included a aerial view of the proposed dock. This is a very preliminary design but should give you an idea
of what they are looking to do. I would appreciate any comments you could provide.
Thanks,
Sherry Bagley
Woods Consulting
1714 CR 1, Suite 22
Dunedin, FL 34698
www.woodsconsulting.org
Phone: 727-786-5747
Fax: 727-786-7479
1/19/2007
SCALE: 1" = 50'
t ?
30.0 CS
1 ?
I I
I 1
I I
I .10 .0
I I
I I
I 182.1 I
I I
I
I
21 I I
I
p1 I
gl 1
a
?I I
?I I
I I
120.1
699 BAY
ESPLANADE
WOODS CONSULTING
1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SURE 22
DUNEDIN FL 34698
PH. (7275 786-5747
FAX (727) 786-7479
Y
C)
m
W
co
W
6.0 co 25%
74.5 OR
WATERWAY , , , •
5.0 .. .i..?....•
5.0 70.0
25.0 CSI 25.0 CS I I
25.0 CS I 4.0 I 25.0 CS i 1
? > I 1 1
18.0 CS i i 18.0 CS I I
?• t I I
18.0 CS 7F-*1 ?- 3.0 i 18.0 CS I i 1182.1
'
! L 1 I I
18.0CSI? I 18.0 CS I I
I
18.0 CS I 3.0 r1 • 18.0 CS I J '
I z1 C:?> EXISTING DOCK
° $1 EXISTING BOAT
16.0 CS•I o 16.0 CS II
I w1
16.0 CS 1 I X40 16.0 CS I I •
U
Q
m
W
co
w
0
co
c')
r
60.0
125.0
693
BAY ESPLANADE 689 685
F
BAY ESPLANADE BAY ESPLANADE
THE CHANNEL CLUB
PROPOSED DOCK
73 BAY ESPLANADE
TOTAL SQUARE FEET XXXXXXXXX
WATERWAY WIDTH 750.0 FT
WATERFRONT WIDTH 125.0 FT EA
MHW +1.4' MLW -0.61
*ELEVATIONS REFEREN CE NGVD-1929
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 - 11:19am P:\Epic Holdings Docks (191-05)\CAD\EPIC HOLDINGS Master 010807.dwg
SCALE: 1" = 50'
w?
r
0
•
TOTAL SQUARE FEET XXXXXXXXX
WOODS CONSULTING THE CHANNEL CLUB WATERWAY WIDTH 750.0 FT
1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 WATERFRONT WIDTH 1250 FT EA
DUNEDIN FL 34693 MHW *1A' MLW -0.8'
PH. 72 736-5747 PROPOSED DOCK
FAX 786-7479 "ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NGVD-1929
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 -11:20am P:1Epic Holdings Docks (191-05)\CADIEPIC HOLDINGS Master 010807.dwg
0 • Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 4:46 PM
To: 'thomas ziola'
Cc: Renee@Northsideengineering.com
Subject: RE: density transfer
Kathy -
What has been explained to you by Renee is correct. On their own, each lot (685 Bay Esplanade
and 689 Bay Esplanade), based on a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre, is allowed
four dwelling units each. When the two lots are combined as one lot for development purposes,
however, as was done under Case FLD2005-08088, the maximum number of dwelling units is
nine dwellings. Case FLD2005-08088 was approved for eight dwelling units, thereby having an
excess of one dwelling unit to be used in a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR).
The lot for 689 Bay Esplanade could not be used for the TDR because it presently developed with
a 13-unit motel, which is nonconforming to existing density limitations, and is currently an
operating motel. There are no existing dwelling units available to be transferred. The lot at 685
can be used for the TDR to 635 Mandalay Avenue because it is presently developed with a duplex,
while the density limitations would permit a maximum of four dwelling units, allowing the transfer
of one dwelling unit that will not affect either the existing or proposed development.
I hope this answers your questions. If not, or if you have more questions, feel free to email me
or call me (562-4504).
Wayne Wells
Planner III
-----Original Message-----
From: thomas ziola [mailto:tbziola@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:49 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Renee@Northsideengineering.com
Subject: density transfer
Dear Wayne,
Spoke to Renee from Northside Engineering to verify density on 685 and 689 Bay Esplande.
It is our understanding that each property has four density units. When the properties are
combined by unity of title we then gain a density giving us a total of nine units.
Our concern is in by transferring one unit from 685 Bay Esplande at this time will not
jeopardize our project which requires a total of eight units.
please confirm receipt of this email.
Also thank you for your time and consideration on this matter.
Kathy Ziola
10/3/2006
xz
w
CUs -'I?• Z?? ? -^ .?
y:
yC-3' `..._ . ?Q\
-VTEW
LONG RANGE PIANNING
Dnvr•.LOPiv ENT Rrvu:w
Ms. Renee Ruggiero
Northside Engineering Services Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930
Clearwater, Florida 33755
RE: FLD2005-08088 - 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade
Time Extension Development Order
Dear Ms. Ruggiero:
September 7, 2006
On November 15, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above
application for Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings in the Tourist
(T) District with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 13 feet (to water feature),
reductions to the front (north) setback along Somerset Street from 15 feet to 12.67 feet (to
building), from 15 feet to 9.83 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging
area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to
building height from 35 feet to 46.83 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 feet for perimeter
parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building within the visibility triangles, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.B.
Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building
permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (November 15, 2006). This
same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is
shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director
may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not
there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project.
On September 6, 2006, you submitted a request for a six-month time extension to apply for a
building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited the time delay for
approval by the CDB for the companion project at 693 - 699 Bay Esplanade as the main problem
with the inability to submit for building permits within the allowable timeframe.
Since the approval of this project, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this
project:
1. The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per unit. This
project was approved with 13 parking spaces for eight attached dwelling units, at a
parking ratio of 1.625 parking spaces per dwelling unit.
2. Beach by Design has been revised for the "Old Florida District" to require a minimum
front setback of 15 feet (West: 13 feet [to water feature]; North: 12.67 feet [to building],
9.83 feet [to pavement] approved under FLD2005-08088) and building stepbacks for
buildings exceeding 35 feet in height (none provided under FLD2005-08088).
1 1:A,NF 1111;1 AW). \I:\51;1\'
C I'TY OF C LEARWA'TER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Pos-r Orri(:r Box 4748, Cu:AKWA•rnK, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL Sia,wicns BiJILDWG, 100 SOUTIf MYRTLE. AvENUP:, CLBARWATIT, Rom[)A 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
?1n1x I)ni;: n, C;,1 Nr.11.N11:\11t1:r I Im I' I [\Nm:n " C;H \7J1.\;b:\11WR
1311.1. J(1Nu,N, Cn1 ?M'11 \11U NHI' CARL1iN A. PF I :.RSD,I CUI '\c11 \11:\11;1;1;
September 7, 2006
Ruggiero - Page Two
In considering the above changes to the Code and Beach by Design, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month
time extension to May 15, 2007, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the
site improvements on your parcel at 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade.
In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the
CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such
extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved
through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in
writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted
by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the
Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with
sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration
date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of
war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and
the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether
significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending
or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity
to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate
the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter
with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at
727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
Micha el
Planning Director
S: Wlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished Applications Way Esplanade 685-689 Bay Esplanade Condos (T) -
ApprovedlBay Esplanade 685-689 Time Ext. Dev. Order 9.7.06doc
ZMFRIR WC(p)
E"M" SmAka INC.
August 31, 2006
Mr. Wayne Wells
Planner III
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33765
RE: FLD2005-08088
685-689 Bay Esplanade
Somerset Condominiums (South)
Dear Mr. Wells:
• CIVILo
LAND PLANNING o
ENVIRONMENTAL 0
TRANSPORTATION o
IIECE D
S ° 6 2006
On November 15, 2005 the Community Development Board granted approval of the above
referenced project. The Development Order issued to this site expires on November 15, 2006.
As you are aware, this site is a part of a twin development together with the site to the north.
The northern portion of the development required additional hearings due to it's location in a
iifferent district within Beach by Design.
Due to the additional time involved with the approval process for the northern portion of the
project, we hereby respectfully request a six month extension to the Development Order to allow
this project to move forward simultaneously with it's twin to the north.
Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me. Thank
you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this development projects.
Respectfully,
c5x??
Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner
cc:: NES 532 File
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MI N DS PRI NG.COM
727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 8036
09/06/2006 16:00
7274468
NORTHSIDE ENG JV
PAGE 01/02
CIVIL
Northside LANDSCAPE •
iace??nc?c rvlcea. 7itC. EAWRONMENTAL •
TRANSPORTANON •
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
DA'I'S: September 6, 2006 'T'IME:
TO: Mr. Wayne Wells FAX NO:
OF: Clearwater Planning Dept.
4:10 pm
562-4865
PAGE 1 OF 2
FROM. Angel Haines, Executive Administrative Assistant
PROJECT NAME: 693 & 699 Bay Esplanade / FLD2005-08088
COMMENTS:
Please see enclosed extension request. Thanks.
PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT OUR. OFFICE SHOULD YOU HAVE
ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS PROJECT.
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEAR WATER, FLORIDA 33755
T (727) 443-28691F (727) 446-8036
El AWL: ADMIN VORTHSIDEE'NGINEERING. CO.M
Ilsas1ao??i
S1I?? ?tR`IHf? ?
C ITY OF C LEARWA'TER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING November 16, 2005
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930
Clearwater, Florida 33755
RE: Development Order - FLD2005-08088 - 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On November 15, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request
for Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a
reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 13 feet (to water feature), reductions to the front
(north) setback along Somerset Street from 15 feet to 12.67 feet (to building), from 15 feet to 9.83 feet
(to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 46.83 feet (to roof
deck) with an additional 4.17 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building
within the visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. The Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-
803.B;
2.. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy;
4. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a
monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and
color of the building;
5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground.
Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be
installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected
utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to
BRIAN J. AUNGSr, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYr HAMiUl-ON, COUNCIL\IE\IBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCIUOPOHER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCIUMBIHER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ENIPLOYER"
0 0
be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the
commencement of work;
November 16, 2005 Ghovaee - Page 2
6. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from-the condominiums;
7. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
8. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
9. That all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project be brought up
to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304);
10. That all unused existing driveways/parking areas within the Bay Esplanade and Somerset rights-of-
way be removed and be sodded, acceptable to the Engineering Department;
11. That the encroaching pavement along the south property line be removed prior to the issuance of the
first Certificate of Occupancy;
12. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised to remove the Medjool date
palm from the visibility triangle at the street intersection and the shrubs and tree from the waterfront
sight visibility triangle in the southeast comer of the site; and
13. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical
and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are
attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (November 15, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained
within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with
successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a
period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community
Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development
coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on December 2, 2005 (14
days from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504.
You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.Myclearwater.com/ og v/dgpts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
Michael De k, Al - Planning Director
S:Tlanning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications0ay Esplanade 685-689 Bay Esplanade Condos (7) -
ApprovedlBay Esplanade 685-689 Development Order.doc
C]
Wells, Wayne
From: Renee Ruggiero [Renee@northsideengineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 12:05 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Angel Haines
Subject: RE: Staff Reports for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting
Dear Mr. Wells:
Please accept this communication as acknowledgement, acceptance and
intent to comply with all conditions of approval contained within your
staff report for Case number FLD2005-08088.
If you have questions or require additional information please feel free
to contact me. As always, thank you for you assistance and professional
guidance.
Respectfully,
Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.wells@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 11:47 AM
To: Renee Ruggiero
Cc: Lindac@jpfirm.com
Subject: Staff Reports for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting
Renee -
Attached are the Staff Reports for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting
for the following cases:
1. FLD2005-08088, 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade; and 2. FLD2005-08090, 693 -
699 Bay Esplanade.
To be placed on the consent agenda for this meeting, please indicate to
me by noon, Monday, November 14, 2005, that the conditions of approval
for Case No. FLD2005-08088 are acceptable. Thanks.
Wayne
<<Bay Esplanade 685-689 Staff Report.doc>> <<Bay Esplanade 693-699
Staff Report.doc>>
1
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 11:47 AM
To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail)
Cc: 'LindaC@jpfirm.com'
Subject: Staff Reports for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting
Renee -
Attached are the Staff Reports for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting for the following cases:
1. FLD2005-08088, 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade; and
2. FLD2005-08090, 693 - 699 Bay Esplanade.
To be placed on the consent agenda for this meeting, please indicate to me by noon, Monday, November 14, 2005, that
the conditions of approval for Case No. FLD2005-08088 are acceptable. Thanks.
Wayne
TJ
Bay Esplanade Bay Esplanade
685-689 Staff Re... 693-699 Staff Re...
Message 0 • Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Linda Cunningham [LindaC@jpfirm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 1:46 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Peter Meroli - Bay Esplanade
Hi Wayne Wells,
Ed asked me to email you and let you know that he represents Peter Meroli regarding his properties located at
685 Bay Esplanade and 693 Bay Esplanade. Ed would like a staff report for both when they are ready.
Please email me or fax me the staff reports and I will forward them to Ed when you are all set to send them
Thanks Wayne,
Linda Cunningham
Secretary to Ed Armstrong
LindaC@jpfirm.com
727-461-1818,ext. 2155
727-462-0365 fax
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE To the extent this email contains federal tax advice, such
advice was not intended to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. If you would like us
to prepare written tax advice designed to provide penalty protection, please contact us and we will
be happy to discuss the matter with you in more detail.
11/9/2005
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
•+? nrY ?? 1, POST OFFICE Box 474c8, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
-eG-_ ?C
+a'e-T iV k,A(;'}t MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
November 3, 2005
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930
Clearwater, Florida 33755
Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-08088)
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Case No. FLD2005-08088 for Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached
dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to
13 feet (to water feature), reductions to the front (north) setback along Somerset Street from 15
feet to 12.67 feet (to building), from 15 feet to 9.83 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero
feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool
deck), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 46.83 feet (to roof deck) with an additional
4.17 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building within the visibility
triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.13, for property located at 685 - 689 Bay
Esplanade, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on
November 15, 2005.
The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3'd floor of City Hall at
112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
?4? M. tv"
M. Wells, AICP
Wayne
Planner III
S: IPlanning Depai-imentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 685-689 Bay Esplanade Condos (T) 11.15.05
CDB - WWIBay Esplanade 685-689 CDB Letter.doc
FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR
BILL. JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COliNCII_MEMBF..R
HOYT HAMILTON, COUNC 11.MEMBER CAREEN A. PRT'ERSiiN, COUNCIL MEMBER
"FQIIAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMA'ri i ACTION EMPLOYT'R"
Re: 685-689 Bay Esplanade 0 0 Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Renee Ruggiero [Renee@northsideengineering.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 11:36 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Re: 685-689 Bay Esplanade
You will have the information first thing Monday morning. Thank you very much for the opportunity to make correction.
Renee
--------------------------
Sent from my B1ackBerry Wireless Handheld
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>
To: Renee Ruggiero <Renee@northsideengineering.com>
Sent: Sat Oct 08 09:51:412005
Subject: 685-689 Bay Esplanade
Renee -
The wrong reduced (8.5"x11") drawing of the Landscape Plan was submitted (submitted was 693-699 Bay Esplanade). Need
to submit/swap out in packages (including my original file copy).
Will get back to you with anything else amiss or in error.
Wayne
10/9/2005
• •
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 9:52 AM
To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail)
Subject: 685-689 Bay Esplanade
Renee -
The wrong reduced (8.5"x11") drawing of the Landscape Plan was submitted (submitted was 693-699 Bay Esplanade).
Need to submit/swap out in packages (including my original file copy).
Will get back to you with anything else amiss or in error.
Wayne
CIVIL •
LAND PLANNING •
ENVIRONMENTAL •
TRANSPORTATION •
October 3, 2005
Mr. Wayne Wells
Planner
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE: FLD2005-08088 - 685 Bay Esplanade - DRC Response
NES # 0532
Dear Mr. Wells:
ORIGINAL
? ?uvL
?f OCT u s zoo
D
Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on September 29, 2005.
General Eniineerina
1. Where is dumpster to be located when not in trash staging area? Trash Room has been labeled
see Sheet C2.1.
2. Install F.H.A. and unrestricted fire line in city street rights-of-way or dedication of an utility
easement will be required prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Acknowledged.
3. Fire Department Connection shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the front of the building
and within 40-feet of a Fire Hydrant. See Sheet C3.1 for revision.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Prior to Building Permit:
1. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to
standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Acknowledged, see
Sheet C3.1 for revision.
Prior to CO:
1. The condominium plat for Bay Esplanade Condominiums shall be recorded with Pinellas County.
Acknowledged.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental
1. Dry Detention systems must contain a grassed bottom and designed with no steeper than 4:1 side
slope. See Sheet C3.1.
Fire
1. By order of Chief of Construction, NO APPROVALS on Bay Esplanade, Skiff Point,
Brightwater, until water supply is improved. All questions regarding this fire comment should be
addressed to Chief of Construction S. C. Strong who can be reached at 727-562-4327 ext 3039.
PRIOR TO PERMIT. Per telephone conversation with the Chief of Construction, Clearwater
will run water lines as needed.
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
NESADMIN@MINDSPRIN6.COM Page 1 of5
NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036
• *ORIGINAL
2. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required.
Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB. See architectural plans information.
3. An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump.
Must be located above BFE. Emergency lighting should also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB.
Electrical Room/Generator Room has been added to floor plans for 1" and 2nd floors and
will be above BFE.
4. Standpipe connection for dock area must be connected to firepump/wet standpipe system.
Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. See Sheet C3.1
5. Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure adequate water
supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Calculations due PRIOR TO PERMIT.
Acknowledged.
Landscanine
1. Edges of the pavement along the- parking space and driveway, as well as the southern edge of the
parking spaces and backup flair must be curbed with vertical curbing for the protection of
landscape materials. Curbing has been added, see revised Sheet C3.1.
2. Sheet Ll.l -Revise Landscaping Note #8, as the minimum size of trees at time of planting is 10-
foot tall and 2.5-inch caliper. Landscape note revised, see Sheet L1.1.
Stormwater
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant is to provide a copy of the approved
SWFWMI) permit for the proposed site. So noted.
Solid Waste
1. Show where recycling carts are placed for resident use. The developer will pay in lieu of
recycling.
Traffic Eneineerine
1. All parking spaces must meet minimum City standard dimensions. - Columns inside parking
space interfere with standard dimensions. Proposed parking meets the minimum City
standard dimensions. See revised site plans.
2. Re-locate handicap parking stall near elevator. Met with Ben Elbo w/ Traffic prior to final
development of plan and submittal. Traffic had no objection, providing plan included
marked walkway.
3. Vertical clear height for parking garage must beat a minimum of 8 feet 2 inches (8'2") including
entrance, route to handicap parking space and exit. Architect added clear height dimension of
9' to plans.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule.
Plannine
1. Indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. None proposed at FL
Uz?
06200:
Page 2 of 5 __ !
• ORIGINAL
2. General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide the value of the site after all site and building
improvements are constructed. The value of the property is estimated at $9,600, 000 upon
completion.
3. In accordance with City Council directives, the northern 60 feet of this site may be eligible for
a maximum height of 50 feet and the balance of the site eligible for a maximum height of 65
feet. Acknowledged,
Additionally, heights above 35 feet are expected to mitigate the increased height through
increased setbacks and/or stepbacks in the building design.
4. This site may be eligible for the Transfer of Development Rights of one dwelling unit.
5. Staff will not support the proposed reduction to the side (south) setback of two feet to
pavement. Both parking spaces within the area have been removed; the proposed side
(south) setback is 9 feet. See Sheet CM for revision.
6. Color in/blacken the columns and walls on the ground floor on the civil plans, much like was
done for the project across the street at 693-699 Bay Esplanade. Per architect columns and
walls have been blackened as requested.
7. Potential condition of approval: That the final design and color of the building be consistent
with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
8. Potential condition of approval: That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to
the issuance of any permits;
9. Potential condition of approval: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and
any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height,
designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
10. Potential condition of approval: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the
proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing
utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street
frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative
shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric,
phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the
applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of
work;
11. Potential condition of approval: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of
the first Certificate of Occupancy;
12. Potential condition of approval: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the
issuance of any permits;
13. Potential condition of approval: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the
issuance of any permits;
14. Potential condition of approval: That all applicable requirements of
Code be met related to seawall setbacks;
Page 3 of 5
Cha ter 39 of the Buildin
OCT 0 6 2005
PLANNING 8 O Uf1APMEMt S`JCS
IlY LE MA;FE -
0 0 OkiunvAL
15. Potential condition of approval: That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the
residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately
from the condominiums;
Acknowledge items 7 -15 all potential conditions of approval
16. Egress from the rear stairwell must be to the outside (cannot go into the parking garage). Pool
fence blocks such egress. Remove fence/provide gate in accordance with Building Code
requirements. Egress has been redirected to exterior of building and gate has been
added.
17. Since it appears that the existing dock is being retained, how does one access the dock? Gate
and walkway have been added to plan, see revised Sheet C3.1.
18. Trash staging area drawn parallel to Somerset Street and only touches the driveway at a point.
Reality is that the dumpster must get from the trash room to the staging area and the concrete
trash staging area will be parallel with the edge of the driveway. Revise. See Sheet C2.1 for
revision
As to the size of the trash staging area, how many dumpsters will fit into the trash room? If only
one, the size of the trash staging area should be close to the size of the dumpster. Revise.
19. Strongly recommend providing two parking spaces per unit. Acknowledge
recommendation. However, proposed number of parking spaces meets or exceeds
current code.
20. Sheet C2.1 - Provide the dimension from the front property line of Somerset Street to the
closest edge of pavement (without the radius; just from the edge of pavement extended).
Dimension has been added.
21. Need to remove existing driveways/parking areas within the Bay Esplanade and Somerset
rights-of-way and sod. Acknowledged, see Sheet C2.1.
22. In lieu of the water feature on the west side, suggest a special landscape feature instead.
Suggestion acknowledged, Developers prefer to move forward with proposed water
feature.
23. Based on the plans submitted for the project across Somerset Street and since it isn't labeled
"mailboxes", it is unclear why the mailboxes are proposed in the open air area of the parking
garage. Mailboxes are generally placed inside the lobby area. Advise/revise. Mailboxes have
been moved to the lobby. See revised site plans.
24. Based on the submitted survey and the site plan, it appears that the pavement for the abutting
property is encroaching onto this property by two feet. How is this being addressed? If being
retained, the side (south) setback is zero feet (to existing pavement) and will need an easement
to be recorded over this area of encroachment. Pavement will be removed, see revised
Sheet C3.1
The landscape plan design along this south property line does not take into account this existing
encroaching pavement. Revise. No revision required pavement will be-removed. landsca
to be installed as shown. L5 PIE
Page 4 of 5 OCT 0 6 2005
i?
•
@RIGINAL
25. Elevations - Elevator machine room appears as a square box on top of the structure with a flat
roof, lacking the detail that the stair tower does. Suggest relocating the elevator machine room
to be part of the stair tower with a pitched roof. Revised plan provides a pitched roof as
suggested.
26. Elevations - Most balconies appear to be a solid, stuccoed wall with a railing on top. The east
elevation is not as detailed as to what is proposed regarding the balcony. The balcony extends
across the full length of the building but is unclear as to whether the balcony edge is a solid,
stuccoed wall or simply railings. Revise. Simple railing, see revised elevation.
27. Elevations - It is unclear is there are any parapets extending above the roof deck, except at the
corners of the building. It is noted that the a/c units are to be located on the top of the building,
but no screening of these units appears to be provided (usually screened by the parapets).
Advise/revise. See elevation for noted parapet.
28. Elevations - Clarify that the sides of the chimneys (as seen on the east and west elevations) are
stucco, rather than a stone finish. The sides of the chimneys are stone finish, see revised
elevations.
29. Based on the floor plans submitted, the rear balconies extend to the edge of the rear stairwell.
However, the south and north elevations do not indicate such, except for the 4th floor.
Revise/advise. Roofs have been added to the first and second floor plan. See Revised.
Additionally, the east elevation indicates a tiled overhang/roof structure at the first floor level,
extending approximately four feet from the main structure, as indicated on the east elevation.
This overhang/roof structure is not indicated on the 1 st floor plan, nor on the site plans for the
overhang/roof structure as a dashed line. Revise/advise.
30. General Applicability criteria #1 response: Ensure the accuracy of the height of the single
family dwellings, stated at between 30 and 40 feet, based on the Base Flood Elevation and the
measurement of height (to flat roof deck or to midpoint of a pitched roof).
31. Based on the site plan and the building elevations, unclear how this proposal is complying
with the following attached dwelling criteria for the screening of parking: "Off-street parking
within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street
level fagade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building
without parking on the ground level." Advise/revise the plans. Very much like a residential
building, the majority of parking is contained within the footprint to the building with a
couple of parking spaces for guests contained outside of the footprint of the building
much like where guests park when visiting a residence. Spaces have been decreased to
lessen deviations, see Sheet C3.1 for revision.
32. If the building designs for this site and 693/699 Bay Esplanade are the same, unclear why the
water feature is three feet in width on 693/699 Bay Esplanade and only two feet on this
proposal. Explain/revise.
If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office.
Si ely,
Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner
Page 5 of 5
Northside
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: October 6, 2005
To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210
Clearwater, FL 33756
Reference: 685 Bay Esplanade
NES Proj# 0532
We Transmit:
X Enclosed Under Separate Cover
Mail UPS Overnight
Pick-Up X Hand Delivered
CIVIL 0
LAND PLANNING •
ENVIRONMENTAL 0
TRANSPORTATION •
X
X
X
ORIGINAL
OCT 06200;
PLANNING & 001 'c3,0Pk-?F.-.NT SbCv
Originals
Prints
Addendum
Shop drawings
Specifications
Applications
Floppy Disk
1 Comments Letter
15 Flex Development Application (Res. Infill
15 Letter of Authorization & Affidavits
15 Warranty Deeds
15 Surveys
15 Stormwater Report & Narrative 1 signed and sealed)
15 Civil & Landscape Drawings (4 sheets), lsigned and sealed
15 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan
15 8.5" X 11" Colored Landscape Plan
15 8.5 X 11" Colored Renderings
15 8.5 X 11" Building Elevations
1 Color chip attached to Original Arc. Drawing
15 24 X 36 Architectural Drawings
Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments.
By. r,? c
Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
NESADMIN@MINDSPRIN6.COM
N ESTECH®MI N DS PRI N6.COM
727 - 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036
Copies To: FILE
N.PELZER
A.HAINES
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:26 PM
To: Doreen Williams (E-mail)
Subject: Draft 9.29.05 DRC comments
Doreen -
Attached are the draft DRC comments for the following cases (with the DRC time):
1. FLD2005-08086, 405 Island Way (1:30 pm)
2. FLD2005-08090, 693-699 Bay Esplanade (1:35 pm)
3. FLD2005-08088, 685-689 Bay Esplanade (2:00 pm)
The other two cases on S. Gulfview Blvd. are forthcoming.
Wayne
draft 9.29.05 dre draft 9.29.05 dre draft 9.29.05 dre
action agend... action agend... action agend...
CITY OF CLEORWATER
Clearwater* PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
WW W.MYCLEARWATER.COM
September 06, 2005
Housh Ghovaee
601 Cleveland Street
Suite 930
Clearwater, Fl 33755
RE: FLD2005-08088 -- 685 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Completeness
Dear Housh Ghovaee :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2005-08088. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Complete.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on
September 29, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor
of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in
downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no
earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be
reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the
DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the
time of the meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or
Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
k ,,Z 14. G,/tkQ4
Wa e Wells, AICP
Planner III
Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-08088 - 685 BAY ESPLANADE
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:59 PM
To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail)
Subject: FLD2005-08088, 685-689 Bay Esplanade
Renee -
Attached is a Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. The original will be sent to you.
Wayne
J
letter of
repleteness 9.6.05..
Horths e
5"4" lao
•
September 2, 2005
Mr. Wayne Wells
Planner III
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
RECEIVED
SP 0 G 2005
RE: FLD2005-08088 -- 685 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of OMMMDEPARTMEW
NES #532 MY OF CLEARWATER
Dear Mr. Wells:
CIVIL •
LAND PLANNING •
ENVIRONMENTAL •
TRANSPORTATION •
Please find listed below responses to the letter of incompleteness dated September 1, 2005.
1. Trees are now provided on the site plan. See attached.
2. Elevation plan now indicates all mechanical equipment shall be roof mounted.
3. The LLC is now shown on the Affidavit.
4. Floor plans have been provided. See attached.
5. There are no outdoor lighting fixtures planned at this time.
6. The proposed colors (in written form) of the exterior building elements on the
building elevations and color samples/chips have been provided. Also, larger colored
to scale elevations are provided. See attached.
7. Roof building dimensions have been provided on the elevation plans. See attached.
S. Proposed grading, including finished floor elevations of all structures have been
provided. See sheets C3.1.
9. Visibility triangles have now been added to the site plan. See attached.
This should satisfy the incompleteness of the above project. If you have any additional
comments, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
LZ Renee Ruggiero
Project Planner
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NE
SADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM O
NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036
Northside
RECEIVE:u
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: September 6, 2005
To: Wayne Wells, Planner III
100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210
Clearwater, FL 33755
SO() ?20$
Reference: 685 & 689 Bay Esplanade
NES Proj# 532
We Transmit:
Enclosed
Mail
Pick-Up
Per Your Request
X For Your Use
For Your Files
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Under Separate Cover
UPS Overnight
X Hand Delivered
For Your Review & Comment
For Your Approval
For Your Information
• CIVIL •
LAND PLANNING •
ENVIRONMENTAL •
TRANSPORTATION •
X Originals
X_ Prints
Addendum
Shop drawings
Specifications
Applications
Floppy Disk
Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or continents.
Renee Ruggiero, Proj c ner
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
NE5ADMIN@MINDSPRIN6.COM
N ESTECH@MI N DS PRI N6.COM
727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036
CC to: FILE
N. Pelzer
A. Haines
0 D N.'A L
U 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
LL CITY OF CLEtRWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
} Clearwater*
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
WWW.MYCLEARWATER. COM
September 01, 2005
Housh Ghovaee
601 Cleveland Street
Suite 930
Clearwater, Fl 33755
RE: FLD2005-08088 -- 685 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Housh Ghovaee :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2005-08088. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments.
1. While the survey indicates the location of existing trees, neither the site or landscape plans
indicate the driplines of these existing trees nor whether they will be removed or not. Revise.
2. Indicate the location of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (if on
roof, indicate such in a note).
3. Application indicates Peter Pan Developments LLC as one of the owners, however, the
Affidavit does not list this as the owner, rather stating Mr. Vasiloudes and Mr. Meroli as the
owners (these gentlemen are managers/members of the corporation). Revise Affidavit to list
Peter Pan Developments LLC as the owner.
4. Provide floor plans (if each floor is typical, need to indicate typical for each floor).
5. Indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures.
6. Provide the proposed colors of the exterior building elements on the building elevations (in
written form).
Provide color samples/chips of the proposed exterior building colors.
Provide the color rendered west elevation at the same scale as depicted on the elevation sheet
(colored west elevation submitted too small).
7. Provide on the building elevation sheet the height of the building from BFE to the highest roof
deck (assumed to be flat roof), the height of perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and the height
of elevator and stair towers and chimneys (from roof deck), including a dimension from
finished grade to BFE.
8. Sheet C3.1 - Provide proposed grading, including finished floor elevations of all structures.
9. Show the required sight triangle at the street intersection on all appropriate sheets.
Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development
review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed
complete. Please resubmit by 10:00 am on Tuesday, September 6, 2005.
Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-08088 - 685 BAY ESPLANADE
it
LL CITY OF CLEkRWATER
Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W . MYCLEARW ATER. C OM
September 01, 2005
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or
Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours, M024
h2 1 l• Wa e Wells
Planner III
Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-08088 - 685 BAY ESPLANADE
r?
0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 1:09 PM
To: Doreen Williams (E-mail)
Subject: FLD2005-08088, 685-689 Bay Esplanade
Doreen -
Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. I will give you the original when you come over
today for DRC.
Wayne
O
letter of
completeness 9.1.0,
Wells, Wayne • 0
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:47 AM
To: Bill Woods (E-mail)
Cc: Kurleman, Scott; Clayton, Gina
Subject: 685-689 and 693-699 Bay Esplanade
Bill -
As a courtesy to you, please be aware that the upland development approvals for the Flexible Development approval to
construct attached dwellings (condominiums) under Case Nos. FLD2005-08088 and FLD2005-08090 have expired due to
failure to submit building permits to construct the improvements contemplated under those applications. As the docks
approved under FLD2007-03007 were accessory to the upland attached dwellings and Condition #2 stated "That vertical
building construction of the upland development (FLD2005-08088 and FLD2005-08090) commence prior to the issuance
of dock permits," the Flexible Development approval for the docks at these addresses under FLD2007-03007 has expired.
When similar upland projects expire, we will also try to remember to send you a courtesy email informing you (if ycu wera
the applicant) of such expiration of the dock approvals.
Wayne M. Wells, A/CP
Planner III
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756-5520
Phone: 727-562-4504
Fax: 727-562-4865
i i
MEMORANDUM
TO: Community Development Board
FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Planner III 1
RE: Request for Time Extension W
FLD2005-08088 - 685-689 Bay Esplanade
DATE: March 19, 2007
Attached is information related to the request by Kathy Ziola of Somerset Inc., on behalf of Epic
Holdings South, LLC and Peter Pan Developments LLC, for an extension of time relative to the
above referenced project located at 685-689 Bay Esplanade. A one-year extension is being
requested which would expire on May 15, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for
good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause
"may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant
downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this
particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons
as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407,
the Planning Director has previously granted a six-month extension.
The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether
significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or
approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by
the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been
amended in the following that affect this project:
The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per unit. This
project was approved with 13 parking spaces for eight attached dwelling units, at a
parking ratio of 1.625 parking spaces per dwelling unit.
Beach by Design has been revised for the "Old Florida District" to require a minimum
front setback of 15 feet (West: 13 feet [to water feature]; North: 12.67 feet [to building],
9.83 feet [to pavement] approved under FLD2005-08088) and building stepbacks for
buildings exceeding 35 feet in height (none provided under FLD2005-08088).
Attachments:
Letter of Request
Time Extension Development Order September 7, 2006
Maps and Photos
S: (Planning DepartmentICD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 685-689 Bay Esplanade Condos (7)
- Approved - 4.17.07 - WWIBay Esplanade 685-689 Time Extension Memorandum for 4.17.07 CDB.doc
lob 0 0
ExTemzoiv
FLD2
005S08088
685 BAY ESPLANADE
BAY ESPLANADE CONDOS
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
ATLAS # 258A
ZONING: T
LAND USE: RFH
RECEIVED: '08/25/2005
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS:
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
CLWCoverSheet
?.J
F-
L-1
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:21 AM
To: 'mark.andrew.smith@smithbarney.com'
Subject: Bay Esplanade docks
Mark -
Attached are preliminary plans and emails regarding proposed docks adjacent to your house.
Dock provisions in our Code are under Section 3-601. You may find these on our website (myclearwater.com) by following
the links to the Community Development Code.
Call me or email me with any questions you may have (or if you can't find the link to the Code when you go to our website).
Wayne
Proposed Proposed Email to & from S. Email to S. Bagley
-eliminary dock desi:eliminary dock desi, Bagley re p... re M. Quill...
CDB Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 ORIGINAL
Case Number: FLD2005-08088
Agenda Item: D8
Owners/Applicants: Epic Holdings South, LLC and Peter Pan Developments LLC
Representative: Mr. Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
Addresses: 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings in
the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the front (west) setback
from 15 feet to 13 feet (to water feature), reductions to the front
(north) setback along Somerset Street from 15 feet to 12.67 feet (to
building), from 15 feet to 9.83 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to
zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to building
height from 35 feet to 46.83 feet (to roof deck) with an additional
4.17 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the
building within the visibility triangles, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.B.
EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District; Residential Facilities High (RFH) Category
LAND USE:
PROPERTY SIZE: 0.312 acres
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached dwellings (15 apartments)
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (eight condominiums)
ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Medium High Density Residential District;. Overnight
LAND USES: accommodation uses
East: Preservation District; Clearwater Harbor
South: Tourist District; Overnight accommodation uses
West: Tourist District; Attached dwellings
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The area to the north, west and south is currently a mixture of low-
rise attached dwellings and overnight accommodation uses.
Staff Report Community Development Board - November 15, 2005
Case FLD2005-08088 - Page 1 of 9
0 0
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.312 acres is located at the southeast corner of Bay
Esplanade and Somerset Street. The site is a parallelogram corner lot with dimensions of 110 feet
deep by 125 feet wide. The site is currently developed with the two-story, 13-unit Water's Edge
Apartments on the north side and a duplex on the south side. All existing buildings and other site
improvements will be demolished. It is noted that a portion of a driveway for the property to the
south encroaches onto this site and is proposed to be removed as part of this proposal.
Properties to the north, west and south are developed with a mixture of attached dwellings and
overnight accommodation uses. This site is located in the "Old Florida" District of Beach by
Design. Many properties within this District are undergoing change, where the existing
developments are being demolished and new attached dwelling buildings will be constructed.
Proposal: The proposal includes the construction of an eight-unit residential building 46.83 feet
tall (to roof deck). Two dwellings per floor with approximately 2,227 square feet of living area
each are proposed on four floors. A total of 13 parking spaces are proposed, primarily located
under the building. A pool is proposed to the east of the building adjacent to the seawall.
The proposal includes a request for a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 13 feet
(to water feature), reductions to the front (north) setback along Somerset Street from 15 feet to
12.67 feet (to building), from 15 feet to 9.83 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to
trash staging area) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool
deck). The design of the proposed building includes a water feature in the center of the building
facing Bay Esplanade, extending two feet from the base of the building. The building otherwise
meets the minimum 15-foot front setback from Bay Esplanade. The building has been designed
parallel with Bay Esplanade. The lot is a parallelogram, which creates angles to the north and
south sides of the rectangular building in relation to lot lines. The building, pavement backup flair
and pool deck exceeds the required 10-foot side setback, being located 11 feet from the south
property line. Due to the angles created with the building parallel on the lot with Bay Esplanade,
the proposal includes a reduction to the front setback adjacent to Somerset Street of 12.67 feet to
the building. Somerset Street dead-ends at the east side of this property. With the placement of
the building and the angles of property lines, the northwest corner of the building is located 22 feet
from the Somerset Street property line. The proposal includes one parking space outside the
building on the northwest corner at a front setback of 9.83 feet adjacent to the driveway and
approximately 12 feet at the northwest corner of the parking space. Somerset Street currently acts
as a parking area for the existing development on this site. The proposal eliminates this practice
and places all but this one parking space under the building. The minimum required parking is
exceeded by only one space. While this space could be eliminated, parking exceeding the current
minimum requirement for attached dwellings is encouraged. Landscaping in excess of minimum
Code requirements is proposed adjacent to this parking space to adequately screen this parking
space from view from the rights-of-way. With regard to the front setback reduction from Somerset
Street related to the trash staging area, the building will have a refuse collection room on the
ground floor within the parking garage. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on
collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback is necessary to
Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005
Case FLD2005-08088 - Page 2 of 9
0 0
eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site and is common with many newer
developments. This proposal includes a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero
feet (to pool deck). Current development practices place the pool area adjacent to the waterside of
the property, which is generally the most private area of the property, with a pool deck at a zero
setback. The Community Development Board has approved other properties along the water
within the "Old Florida" District with a pool in a similar location and setback as this proposal.
These proposed front and side setbacks are consistent with or exceed the setbacks approved within
the Tourist District for similar projects within this "Old Florida" District.
The proposal includes 13 parking spaces, which exceeds the minimum requirement by one space,
accessed from a driveway from Somerset Street. On-site parking meeting Code requirements will
replace on-street parking within Somerset Street and eliminate parking that requires vehicles to
back into the right-of-way for maneuvering, producing safer conditions. New public sidewalks
will be constructed within the rights-of-way for both Bay Esplanade and Somerset Street, reducing
impacts between pedestrians and motorists and increasing the safety for this area.
An increase to building height from 35 feet to 46.83 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 feet
for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) is included in this proposal. Pursuant to Section 2-803, the
Tourist District allows a height of 35 feet that may be increased to a maximum height of 100 feet,
based upon meeting certain criteria. However, as the subject property is located within the "Old
Florida" District of the Beach by Design special area plan, height is further limited by the
standards set forth in the Plan as being low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community
Development Code. In 1997 and 1998, a Plan was prepared for the City entitled "Clearwater
Beach: Strategies for Revitalization. " This Plan was prepared after an extensive public process,
directive surveys and input from the City Council and City administration. The purpose of Beach
by Design, which was adopted by the City Council in 2001, is to implement the recommendations
of that Plan and regulate development within certain areas of the beach.
The subject property is located within the "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design special
area redevelopment plan which is defined as "an area of transition between resort uses in Central
Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia (Street). " In order to
implement this vision, Beach by Design states that building heights should be low to mid-rise in
accordance with the Community Development Code. While "mid-rise" is not specifically defined
within the Community Development Code, based upon the height standards set forth in the
Medium High Density Residential (MHDR), Tourist (T), and High Density Residential (HDR)
Districts, the Planning Department has previously interpreted "mid-rise" development as having a
maximum height of 50 feet.
Revisions to "Old Florida": At its meeting of September 1, 2005, the City Council discussed a new
policy direction with regard to the "Old Florida" District. This policy direction calls for limiting
the height of buildings on those properties north of Somerset Street to 35 feet; limiting the height
of buildings on the first 60 feet south of Somerset Street to 50 feet; and limiting the height of
buildings in the balance of the District to 65 feet. In addition, the Council gave direction for
increased site design performance by the way of larger setbacks and/or building step backs.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005
Case FLD2005-08088 - Page 3 of 9
0 0
As stated previously in this Staff report, the proposal includes a front setback to the proposed
building adjacent to Bay Esplanade equal to the minimum required setback, less than the minimum
required setback adjacent to Somerset Street and exceeding the minimum side setbacks (south and
east). This application was submitted prior to, and therefore could not anticipate, City Council's
new policy direction. The proposed building with four living floors over ground level parking at a
height of 46.83 feet (to roof deck) is consistent with the new policy direction, as this site falls into
both the 50-foot and 65-foot building height. The building, however, is inconsistent with this new
policy direction in that it does not incorporate any increased setback or step back due to the
building being designed greater than 35 feet in height.
The proposed building has been designed using an Old Florida vernacular style utilizing a light-to-
medium brown stone finish on the first two floors and other vertical portions of the fagadd for
accent. The upper portions of the building fagade will be white stucco with banding at the second
and fourth levels. While the primary roof will be flat, pitched roofs finished with shades of brown
barrel tiles over the stair tower, balconies and end units will provide visual interest to the perimeter
of the roofline.
Pursuant to Section 3-904.A, at street or driveway intersections no structure or landscaping may be
installed within the sight visibility triangle that will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches
and eight feet above grade. There is a Medjool date palm proposed within the visibility triangle at
the street intersection that will need to be relocated to be outside of the visibility triangle. A
building column on the east side of the driveway is also located within the visibility triangle. The
visibility will not be impacted, however, as Somerset Street dead ends at the water at the east side
of the property. Granting the ability for the column within the visibility triangle will not result in
the grant of a special privilege, as similar reductions could be supported elsewhere under similar
circumstances. Pursuant to Section 3-904.B, in order to enhance views of the water from
residential waterfront property, no structure or landscaping may be installed, other than a fence
around a swimming pool or any non-opaque fence not exceeding 36 inches within the sight
visibility triangles formed by the rear and side property lines. The proposal includes hibiscus
shrubs and an Oleander tree-form within the waterfront sight visibility triangle at the southeast
corner of the site, which will need to be removed.
The site will be extensively landscaped with a variety of trees (Gold Trumpet, Oleander tree-form,
Sabal palms, Mexican fan palms, Medjool date palms and Pygmy date palms), shrubs (hibiscus,
ixora and schefflera arboricola) and ground covers (fakahatchee grass and dwarf jasmine). A
retention pond is proposed on the east side of the building adjacent to Somerset Street and the
seawall.
The applicant has not indicated any freestanding signage for this site. Any future freestanding sign
should meet the requirements of the Code, be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in
height and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building.
All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability
criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2-
803.B) have been met.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005
Case FLD2005-08088 - Page 4 of 9
.7
U
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this
site.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803):
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
MAXIMUM Eight dwelling units X
DENSITY (40
rooms/units per acre;
30 dwelling units per
acre) (12 rooms/units
or nine dwellings
maximum
IMPERVIOUS 0.63 X
SURFACE RATIO
(ISR 0.95
LOT AREA (5,000 - 0.312 acres; 13,622 square feet X
10,000 s q. feet
LOT WIDTH (50 - North (Somerset St): 110 feet X
100 feet West Bay Esplanade): 125 feet
FRONT SETBACK North: 12.67 feet (to building), 9.83 X*
(0 - 15 feet) feet (to pavement) and zero feet (to
trash staging area)
West: 13 feet (to water feature)
REAR SETBACK N/A (corner lots have two front and X
10-20 feet two side setbacks
SIDE SETBACK South: 10 feet (to pavement) X*
0 - 10 feet East: Zero feet (to pool deck)
HEIGHT (35 -100 46.83 feet (to roof deck) with an X*
feet maximum) additional 4.17 feet for perimeter
parapets (from roof deck)
PARKING SPACES 13 spaces X
(1.5 spaces per unit
minimum) (12
required)
* See discussion under Analysis.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005
Case FLD2005-08088 - Page 5 of 9
0 •
COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.B):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a X
building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not X
involve direct access to an arterial street.
3. Height: X
a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved
design and appearance;
b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-
street parking on the ground floor of the residential building.
4. Setbacks: X
a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and
dynamic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to
the rear of any building by emergency vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site
plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance.
5. Off-street parking: X
a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per
floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant
portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-
generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units
and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile
modes of transportation;
b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is
designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to
the architectural character and finishes of a residential building
without parking on the ground level.
6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X
guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005
Case FLD2005-08088 - Page 6 of 9
0 •
C(IMPI.TANC'F. WITH GVNFRAT. CTANDARM tgprtinn I_9111-
Consistent Inconsistent
1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties.
2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X
including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts
on adjacent properties.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The subject 0.312 acres is located within the Old Florida District of Beach by Design;
2. The current use of the site is for a 13-unit apartment building and a duplex (which is
nonconforming to current density maximums of 12 rooms or nine dwelling units);
3. The proposal includes the demolition of the existing residential buildings and all existing
site improvements;
4. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by
Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District;
5. Proposed front and side setbacks are consistent with or exceed the setbacks approved
within the Tourist District for similar projects within this "Old Florida" District;
6. The proposed building height is 46.83 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof
deck;
7. The proposed building height at 46.83 feet is consistent with the new City Council policy
direction for the Old Florida District, as this site falls into both the 50-foot and 65-foot
building height areas;
8. The building, however, is inconsistent with this new City Council policy direction in that it
does not incorporate any increased setback or step back due to the building being designed
greater than 35 feet in height;
9. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines and color palette
of Beach by Design;
10. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development; and
11. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005
Case FLD2005-08088 - Page 7 of 9
0 0
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for
attached dwellings.per Section 2-803.B;
2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability
criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and
3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this
application.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
September 29, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL for the Flexible
Development application to permit eight attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a
reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 13 feet (to water feature), reductions to the
front (north) setback along Somerset Street from 15 feet to 12.67 feet (to building), from 15 feet to
9.83 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side
(east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 feet
to 46.83 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and
to permit the building within the visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B, for
the site at 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per
Section 2-803.B;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy;
4. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a
monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials
and color of the building;
5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed
underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting
right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number
of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact
location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's
Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work;
Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005
Case FLD2005-08088 - Page 8 of 9
0 0
6. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums;
7. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
8. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
9. That all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project be
brought up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304);
10. That all unused existing driveways/parking areas within the Bay Esplanade and Somerset
rights-of-way be removed and be sodded, acceptable to the Engineering Department;
11. That the encroaching pavement along the south property line be removed prior to the issuance
of the first Certificate of Occupancy;
12. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised to remove the Medjool
date palm from the visibility triangle at the street intersection and the shrubs and tree from the
waterfront sight visibility triangle in the southeast corner of the site; and
13. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities,
electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to
which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: wa"r t' - 0- M - LI&
Wayne . Wells, AICP, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBOay Esplanade 685-689 Bay Esplanade Condos (T) 11.15.05
CDB - WWIBay Esplanade 685-689 Staff Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005
Case FLD2005-08088 - Page 9 of 9
11
0
gQDD? ? Q
901
aO
a
Ga?
61ROE?Iq ST
'
o Q." Vo oly
r9 a a
s
X9111 WO Sr
v
W
?
W
U
WER
o PROJECT
AGO A ST
C? SITE
0
CAMBRIA
I I Q
OLEN7LD
l? ROYK Y
IEILNgOD
C? 8AY
4
KENDALL
I?g
sky EISPUPIADE m S PN
ti
AorxAwAr gt7 P
BAYMONT ST
y'SQi a o
mm
T
POIN
? ? X
q
PAPAYA ST S
?, k y p"SAC@ o
4
2
Plw 00
Q 01d ? ? o
Location Map
Owner. Epic Holdings South LLC
Peter Pan Developments LLC Case: FLD2005-08088
Site: 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade Property
Size(Acres): 0.312
PIN: 05/29/15/54756/077/0120
05/29/15/54756/077/0130
Atlas Page: 258A
PIN:
Atlas Page:
0.312
05/29/15/54756/077/0120
05/29/15/54756/077/0130
258A
•
0
1
? 1 1 i ? I t ?r 1 I 1 t f
V- n 709-_
Y V
f I I
_
1-J
y
-- l 1 J
l
m
kr I I I ?;--?Z L 5 r
1704'' '
1
y> {13
ACACIA ST" ti
'
r
r--r
,
I i __, I , t 1 1 --
I
1 I IL,J L? I r-' L_il r--? t
A
l
I I l u 1 1 69p I
r l -- I ;
`
I -9----I `L_Jj rL-----1 1--_..- --?
------' _ I I
--- rj
-
---
__J?2 665
I--
?__t ;
_ --} m 68 P
1
-- 1 I 881
6571
^
I 1 I D
654
855 ' 1 ' --? I _ r __ JA 'til _x$58 ? `889 ? -
? ----r ---- I ? 844
S
---1 ?_I W ter-' ?r
?
j It i i Z r"'I ? ?r `--
_
I 1? 6401 i \? V t I _
639 ?-
ROYA .
K
14
Zoning Map
Epic Holdings South LLC
Owner. I Case: FLD2005-08088
Peter Pan Developments LLC
Site: 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade Property 0.312
Size(Acres):
05/29/15/54756/077/0120
PIN:
05/29/15/54756/077/0130
Atlas Page: 258A
1 1
? 71?z
I
IL
F-1 I
709
et cT ac
7vt ehe
i i- -
71
; m ---
>o
J we
y
7 -- i, ' pg
1 1
I
U
X7
-
n -.ten 61 f13
?7SP-^v?i
ACACIA ST
1f ti
-? j rl_t ach d
,
F? ?
alc a vv'
e ?in; c
-
?
,
__,
L
cve?li gs
695 II l j I j 1
I I- ?-?- , ? I I 1 ? I I 1
J
I - I I
3d N a N d' ht
2
?
j 67 - -'I r - `-- I '--' I 14P
?0
J
SOMERSET ST
1669 ---- - I--Jl r--- ' ?- ---
ernigH I ; Attu hed - -; W
665 7-Z4 >
L d i--L1 [d-We1 mgsF - 4
W mm
< 6e7, -
\
}
0
m
685'i
I
/'
---- (
------ -
t - - - - gs
` 661 A ?ached
; '
,,,
657' I ---=e?6 I ; Z l Qmr] ght
l I d ?ellings I y
en}#n
?
- v accom
------1 ==-8?4 W r -1 -- 654 m --- - ;
I
`eel& __ ' Q
1, j2W ?
Ira _
-650 , ' titan i
_rra
655 I I I
omm , -,
l L
I
t
.o I---__
cent
I I 64
4 =-
_
r Isom ?I-? l I r l i
I
tail ?` 2 - t--?
-e ht U 1P
c t I' --
TIT
'
I -
ROYAL WAY
629 I-- ? 4 boo
^
--
> 1 --
I 632 ^
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Epic Holdings South LLC
Owner.
I Case: FLD2005-08088
Peter Pan Developments LLC
Site: 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade Property 0.312
Size (Acres) :
05/29/15/54756/077/0120
PIN: 05/29/15/54756/077/0130
Atlas Page: 258A
subject property
Somerset Street (693 Bay Esplanade)
Esplanade (subject property on right)
685 - 689 Bay Esplanade Page 1 of 2
FLD2005-08088
View looking south at dock area on east side of
View looking east at Somerset Street east of Bay
View looking northeast at development north of
F- -I
685 - 689 Bay Esplanade
FLD2005-08088
View looking at development south of subject
property on east side of Bay Esplanade
- 1
Page 2 of 2
View looking southeast at development directly
south of subject property
View looking west at development on west side
of Bay Esplanade from subject property
View looking east at development on Island Estates
across the water from subject property
. E j' ?(P
Environmental Condition
0 •
Conditions Associated With
FLD2005-08088
685 BAY ESPLANADE
Heather Faessle
562-4897
09/15/2005 Dry Detention systems must contain a grassed bottom and designed with no steeper than 4:1 side Not Met
slope. Provide cross-section for the pond(s). 10/10/05 - SCALING SHEET C3.1 INDICATES THIS
CONDITION MAY BE MET, HOWEVER REQUESTED CROSS SECTIONS NOT PROVIDED.
Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775
09/13/2005 All parking spaces must meet mimimum City standard dimensions. - Columns inside parking Not Met
space interefere with standard dimensions.
2. Re-locate handicap parking stall near elevator. 10/10/05 - SPACE LOCATION OK PER
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS
3. Vertical clear height for parking garage must be at a minimum of 8 feet 2 inches (8' 2")
including entrance, route to handicap parking space and exit. 10/10/05 - CLEAR HEIGHT IS 9'
PER ARCHITECT.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule.
Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
09/26/2005 In accordance with City Council directives, the northern 60 feet of this site may be eligible for a Not Met
maximum height of 50 feet and the balance of the site eligible for a maximum height of 65 feet.
Additionally, heights above 35 feet are expected to mitigate the increased height through
increased setbacks and/or stepbacks in the building design.
09/26/2005 Staff will not support the proposed reduction to the side (south) setback of two feet to pavement. Not Met
09/26/2005 Potential condition of approval: Not Met
JThat the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
09/26/2005 ?submitted
otential condition of approval: Not Met
That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits;
09/26/2005 J Potential condition of approval: Not Met
That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a
monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and
color of the building;
09/26/2005 J Potential condition of approval: Not Met
That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground.
Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be
installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected
utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits
to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the
CaseConditons
Print Date: 10/16/2005
Page 1 of 2
. 16
0
FLD2005-08088
685 BAY ESPLANADE
Zoning Condition
Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
commencement of work;
09/26/2005 ?That Potential condition of approval:
a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy;
09/26/2005,Potential condition of approval:
That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
09/26/2005 J Potential condition of approval:
That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
09/26/2005 / Potential condition of approval:
That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
09/26/2005 Potential condition of approval:
That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums;
09/26/2005 d 10/16/05 - WW
Include as a potential condition of approval.
9/26/05 - WW
Need to remove existing driveways/parking areas within the Bay Esplanade and Somerset
rights-of-way and sod.
09/26/2005 10/16/05 - WW
J Possibly include as a condition of approval if the pavement to the south is necessary.
9/26/05 - WW
Based on the submitted survey and the site plan, it appears that the pavement for the abutting
property is encroaching onto this property by two feet. How is this being addressed? If being
retained, the side (south) setback is zero feet (to existing pavement) and will need an easement to
be recorded over this area of encroachment.
The landscape plan design along this south property line does not take into account this existing
encroaching pavement. Revise.
09/26/2005 10/16/05 - WW
Possibly include as a condition of approval.
9/26/05 - WW
Elevations - It is unclear is there are any parapets extending above the roof deck, except at the
corners of the building. It is noted that the a/c units are to be located on the top of the building, but
no screening of these units appears to be provided (usually screened by the parapets).
Advise/revise.
09/27/2005 10/16/05 - WW
Possibly include as a condition of approval.
9/27/05 - WW
Based on the site plan and the building elevations, unclear how this proposal is complying with the
following attached dwelling criteria for the screening of parking: "Off-street parking within the
footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade
comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on
the ground level." Advise/revise the plans.
Print Date: 10/16/2005
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseConditons
Page 2 of 2
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 12:49 PM
To: Tefft, Robert; Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: DRC re submittals
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Rickard, Leonard
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 12:01 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: DRC re submittals
SHERRY,
HERE ARE FIRE DEPT RESULTS as of 10/11/ 2005
1. FLD2005-08089 41 Devon Drive Planner: Wayne Wells MET
2. FLD2005-08086 405 Island Way Planner: Wayne Wells MET
3. FLD2005-08088 685 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells MET
4. FLD2005-08090 693 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells MET
5. FLD2005-08084 400 Cleveland Street Planner: Robert Teft MET
6. FLD2005-08087 657 Bay Esplanade Planner: Robert Teft MET
7. FLD2005-07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD MET
1
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Albee, Rick
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:32 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin,
Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Keller, James; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard;
Strong, Steve
Subject: RE: resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
41 Devon-One condition Met, other to be condition for building permit.
405 Island Way- No Issues
685 Bay Esplanade- No Issues
693 Bay Esplanade- Conditions Not Met, required prior to building permit.
400 Cleveland- No Issues
657 Bay Esplanade- No Issues.
-----Original Message-----
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:57 PM
To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Keller, James; Pulizotto, Lynne;
Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Strong, Steve
Subject: FW: resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
Correction I should Have Addressed this email as follows:
Good Afternoon DRC Members,
Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
1. FLD2005-08089 41 Devon Drive Planner: Wayne Wells
2. FLD2005-08086 405 Island Way Planner: Wayne Wells
3. FLD2005-08088 685 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
4. FLD2005-08090 693 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
5. FLD2005-08084 400 Cleveland Street Planner: Robert Teft
6. FLD2005-08087 657 Bay Esplanade Planner: Robert Teft
I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your
review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for
this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met,"
please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Wednesday, October
12, 2005.
Thank you
Sherry Watkins
Planning
-----Original Message-----
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:15 PM
To: DRC Members
Subject: resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
Good Afternoon CDB Members,
Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
i
•
1. FLD2005-08089 41 Devon Drive Planner: Wayne Wells
2. FLD2005-08086 405 Island Way Planner: Wayne Wells
3. FLD2005-08088 685 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
4. FLD2005-08090 693 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
5. FLD2005-08084 400 Cleveland Street Planner: Robert Teft
6. FLD2005-08087 657 Bay Esplanade Planner: Robert Teft
I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your
review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for
this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met,"
please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Wednesday, October
12, 2005.
2
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Rice, Scott
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 9:18 AM
To: Wells, Wayne; Watkins, Sherry
Cc: Faessler, Heather; Elbo, Bennett
Subject: FLD2005-08088 - 685 Bay Esplanade
Engineering has reviewed resubmittal for the subject application. Two issues need to be addressed:
Environmental
Dry Detention systems must contain a grassed bottom and designed with no steeper than 4:1 side slope. Provide
cross-section for the pond(s). 10/10/05 - SCALING SHEET C3.1 INDICATES THIS CONDITION MAY
BE MET, HOWEVER REQUESTED CROSS SECTIONS NOT PROVIDED.
Traffic
All parking spaces must meet minimum City standard dimensions. - Columns inside parking space interfere
with standard dimensions. 10/10/05 - HOW WILL COLUMNS IN DRIVE AISLE BE PROTECTED
FROM DAMAGE? COLUMN LOCATIONS WILL MAKE MANEUVERING INTO AND OUT OF
PARKING SPACES DIFFICULT AND COLUMNS ARE IN VULNERABLE LOCATIONS.
COLUMNS SHOULD BE RELOCATED AWAY FROM DRIVE AISLE AND THE ENDS OF
PARKING SPACES.
D. Scott Rice
Land Deve% Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
scott.rice@MyClearwater.com
O7
C
n
M
N
O
101
O
N
O
O
M
17y
O
'O
Ln
L
m
u
m
i
to
r. is ow _ Ad,kk ek P ? 249A 249B
4 12 nr s ASTER STREET 2
7
' CITY OF CLEARWATER
+te >n >ti
Ait 7
eo 20 nd ao >/f 3 I3 >Ia 7 6 e t0 AND VICINITY
11T i PINELI AS COUNTY. FLORIDA
>ta +I+ >09 >0o a0a '? 6 B 9t, 00
08 5 ,is +ro 2 2t+ .pat 14+c1 < 7a! k. - 191AND
8 p WpY
5
r
5 `
PREPARED 81
c? a PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
O` ENGINEERING
A
F
7
0 1
'
3 +
? »>
M DA 1 +0a
^3?.s 16?
1
1 ve, Clearwater.
00 S. M)rlle
l 33
56
i94./}?
(7
7)56
47
(7
7
175
P
F
5
6
It
23 a22 >rol 16 E5d00 7 I 4-e. S iro
rya?.4>JQ
uP +O1
)
h.:
-
2
2-
50
ur:
2
2
5
aatCR
wores/engln¢er/
nllp://www.Nearwaler-R
com/CIiy11¢pallm¢n(¢/puDllc
+'d Kp
'
3 ACACIA
.- T °
3 - .
_
N
.
ray
2 Disdo ma
70a ?± 2 a A n ?e Zv n m 2 1 Public Information data Is furnlshed by the City of Co-oler
1 B A 1 3 1 eo 10 9 6 6 - .3 2 :ieI 1 81,
It
10, Public Works Adminlstrouon/Engln-log. and must De accepted
di
t th
d
d
it
d
th
t
d
t
i
i
t
t
p??!I q A
2 3 4 5 L. n7.-' 9 6 7 ,•'S 4 32a2 <y6BD 2 vU
. 'Y
.
e+a
'
I' ? a 41 a
a
he rec
h the un
ers
an
ng
a
e
an
use
p
en
w
by
received was ccli-ted for the purpose of developing a graphic
Infmstruclure Inventory. As such. the City of Clearwater PWA/E
mMes no warronllos, axPresssd °r Impll°d, nc Ing the
I '1
'
1
-
abr
SOMERSET $T Aa °° $ ayy 1 r l?Q accuracy . completeness. rtltublllly, or suitability of this data for
any ll, parliculor use. Furthermore. the City of Clearwater
3 $ C @ w
aD (? a_`rf•
l 5 6 7 8 9 aea PWA/E assumes n° liability whatsoever assoclated with the use
or misuse of Sven data.
m 1 : CAPPI Y°III. 7° .?f'?esA ?+
0
C 14 1 I 10 1 f?blfl
ee
9
M
This Atlpa page Is subbjee to periodic changes.
S
T '?sJ'61
( all !!a 5 B a04
00 49
as :a <
:4P or
For Infarmbllon about latest revisl°ns please call PWA/E D
w
it
it
b
„
I °
.
g eer <
NI
CAWRIA ST a 4 E( s
our
e
s
e
p
I -
?• a s
s
T a
6 ae!
9
a+7 ea1
e e R
`? ,Q PAW" I
N
?J7, r Co DO:
..
i
a 1 3 1 Tl 10 1Y yea 4
1 N 41 bd
,. 77
3-C99 .
1}
A l a a $ as ,fi„ 1 a -12 : pea.
s 8
.
I g IDLE
SU NI
a LD S
a T g T5 m
F 17 se, T
6 e
9 0 100 200 400 600
Co S Iy3
::
14 1
@ @ 3 I 11
a 10
2 a 3
tgaea ' 4
. 6
SF
SCALE: 1" = 400'
2
1
- -
2 e
g CL E ST w ?
: ;
ae !ey
AVOF CLW. B ROYAL' o WAY ? LEGEND:
B A CON 0. ary
60-118 l
9
13
t21R 3 71
a
2 1
°? x11
12
s° it t0 9
B I
O BLOCK NUMBER
g HEIL WAO D ST g aI! 3
i 7 IV
*THE CAY T
1 m w
3 ... c a G s a 'C
°tr e+?
la s p
°S
00 1234 LOT ADDRESS
CLW. SEA
CONDO 11 !78 4 5 6 7 6 a S <e
ESPIXNAOE $' 00
®
1}
11 ar
6
Or{ an g as
o 0
eti
c 1 ° 11 e
5
13
00 ----- CITY LIMITS LINE
H 1 xn sse " g 1
,
ms
I
° va ?. el 7er .
" 4
E
m AVAI
ON
gT
g
1ye1T I. I
as lea '` aOY _
_
SHADED
AEA l
t- J
Y
P
7
t
]° 4
5 e
6
el a9
CR
A
'12.. 2 J, a' 13 a 3
a°. LIMITS
OUTS
EARWA
ER
C
CITY
2 a 1 -4
14 13 2
11 ed.
lu
_
a°aa1
)
it`a3 epi 14 am 2
? AGREEMENT TO ANNEX
?/ CC
R a a d;
1
WAY r 9
1
:,? as Dy eys 1
tea.
? CITY OWNED PROPERTY
W
KENOA[L
S7 TA I
5?"'
4 16660
W3 R+ca a as sei t 6 6°' I
5 MDR ZONING DESIGNATION
\
2 1 5 B 9 1 <. 4
17
a 6f a>e.
J ?
15 14
13 Dy
11
10 3 Bat
eae 0.., 7
r4 L:: 6 3r'?` 0E1
n 18eee ZONE LINE
_ 3 a 19 5
O 6 BAY ESPLANADE
1W . w
68I D0. T15-)23' ? I
R[70HC ORD
FlRE aw
(2) g4
LEX
CLEARWATER BEACH REG COMP O C /
I
?csu a/u/o.
S4 ? 33/01
11JJ
#
III MANDALAY
os.D. yu PARK
/R yr
O S
duck "i7
m a
12
p
° R ROCKAWAY It STREET
° MIL $ a '
fi BELLE HARBOR
I `
Yg
1 2
to
91
520
6 7d ®
12b 1- 16
REVISED:
-
--
g id
HDR 09/09/2002
a
sw.ma-m T _ ZONING ATLAS
app a
SW 1 /4 OF SECTION
Q /
® V ?
267A
_ 267B 44 5 - 29 S - 15 E O /--?
0
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 8:59 AM
To: Wells, Wayne; Tefft, Robert
Subject: FW: resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Reid, Debbie
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 2:30 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Cc: Kader, Art
Subject: RE: resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
Sherry, P&P has no issues with the below cases.
Debbie O
-----Original Message-----
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:57 PM
To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Keller, James; Pulizotto, Lynne;
Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Strong, Steve
Subject: FW: resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
Correction I should Have Addressed this email as follows:
Good Afternoon DRC Members,
Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
1. FLD2005-08089
41 Devon Drive
Planner: Wayne Wells
2. FLD2005-08086
3. FLD2005-08088
4. FLD2005-08090
5. FLD2005-08084
6. FLD2005-08087
405 Island Way Planner: Wayne Wells
685 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
693 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
400 Cleveland Street Planner: Robert Teft
657 Bay Esplanade Planner: Robert Teft
I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review
(please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in
Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me
via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2005.
Thank you
Sherry Watkins
Planning
-----Original Message-----
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:15 PM
To: DRC Members
Subject: resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
Good Afternoon CDB Members,
Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
1. FLD2005-08089 41 Devon Drive Planner: Wayne Wells
2. FLD2005-08086 405 Island Way Planner: Wayne Wells
3. FLD2005-08088 685 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
4. FLD2005-08090 693 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
5. FLD2005-08084 400 Cleveland Street Planner: Robert Teft
6. FLD2005-08087 657 Bay Esplanade Planner: Robert Teft
I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review
(please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in
Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me
via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2005.
z
'r
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 3:32 PM
To: Wells, Wayne; Tefft, Robert
Subject: FW: Resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Rickard, Leonard
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 3:29 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
SHERRY,
HERE ARE FIRE DEPT RESULTS
1. FLD2005-08089 41 Devon Drive Planner: Wayne Wells MET
2. FLD2005-08086 405 Island Way Planner: Wayne Wells MET
3. FLD2005-08088 685 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells NOT MET
4. FLD2005-08090 693 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells NOT MET
5. FLD2005-08084 400 Cleveland Street Planner: Robert Teft MET
6. FLD2005-08087 657 Bay Esplanade Planner: Robert Teft NOT MET
7. FLD2005-07071 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD MET
-----Original Message-----
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:57 PM
To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Keller, James; Pulizotto, Lynne;
Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Strong, Steve
Subject: FW: resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
Correction I should Have Addressed this email as follows:
Good Afternoon DRC Members,
Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
1. FLD2005-08089 41 Devon Drive
Planner: Wayne Wells
2. FLD2005-08086 405 Island Way Planner: Wayne Wells
3. FLD2005-08088 685 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
4. FLD2005-08090 693 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
5. FLD2005-08084 400 Cleveland Street Planner: Robert Teft
6. FLD2005-08087 657 Bay Esplanade Planner: Robert Teft
I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your
review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for
this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met,"
1
please affirm to me via email. Ose have these cases reviewed, if possibo 12:00 pm on Wednesday, October
12, 2005.
4 Thank you
Sherry Watkins
Planning
-----Original Message-----
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:15 PM
To: DRC Members
Subject: resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
Good Afternoon CDB Members,
Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
1. FLD2005-08089 41 Devon Drive Planner: Wayne Wells
2. FLD2005-08086 405 Island Way Planner: Wayne Wells
3. FLD2005-08088 685 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
4. FLD2005-08090 693 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
5. FLD2005-08084 400 Cleveland Street Planner: Robert Teft
6. FLD2005-08087 657 Bay Esplanade Planner: Robert Teft
I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your
review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for
this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met,"
please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Wednesday, October
12, 2005.
2
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:57 PM
To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa
A.; Keller, James; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Strong, Steve
Subject: FW: resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
Correction I should Have Addressed this email as follows:
Good Afternoon DRC Members,
Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
1. FLD2005-08089
41 Devon Drive
Planner: Wayne Wells
2. FLD2005-08086
3. FLD2005-08088
4. FLD2005-08090
5. FLD2005-08084
6. FLD2005-08087
405 Island Way Planner: Wayne Wells
685 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
693 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
400 Cleveland Street Planner: Robert Teft
657 Bay Esplanade Planner: Robert Teft
I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review
(please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in
Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me
via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2005.
Thank you
Sherry Watkins
Planning
-----Original Message-----
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:15 PM
To: DRC Members
Subject: resubmittals for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
Good Afternoon CDB Members,
Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 15, 2005, CDB meeting:
1. FLD2005-08089
41 Devon Drive
Planner: Wayne Wells
2. FLD2005-08086
3. FLD2005-08088
4. FLD2005-08090
5. FLD2005-08084
6. FLD2005-08087
405 Island Way Planner: Wayne Wells
685 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
693 Bay Esplanade Planner: Wayne Wells
400 Cleveland Street Planner: Robert Teft
657 Bay Esplanade Planner: Robert Teft
I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review
(please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in
1
Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" ttill "not met," please affirm to me
via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2005.
2:00 pm Case Number: FLD2005-08088 -- 685 BAY ESPLANADE ,
Owner(s): Epic Holdings South , V%
139 Bayside Dr
Clearwater, Fl 33767
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Representative: Housh Ghovaee?
601 Cleveland Street
Clearwater, Fl 33755
TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: nestech@mindspring.com
Location: 0.312 acres located at the southeast comer of Bay Esplanade and Somerset Street.
Atlas Page: 258A
Zoning District: T, Tourist
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (west)
setback from 15 feet to 13 feet (to water feature), reductions to the front (north) setback along Somerset
Street from 15 feet to 12.67 feet (to building), from. 15 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero
feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to proposed
pavement) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from
10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 feet to xx feet (to roof deck) with
an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building within the visibility
triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B.
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761
2544 Frisco Drive
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Neighborhood Coral Resort Condominum
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767
483 E Shore Drive
TELEPHONE: 727-446-3711, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: coral483@aol.com
Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767
100 Devon Dr
1 FInEPaQNE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com
Presenter:-Wayne-Wells, Planner III
?Q1 t W AI 13vZ"'g4U
Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells; Neil'Thom2n, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard If ?t M'e'
Applicant/Rep: Housh Ghovaee, Doreen Williams, Renee Ruggerio I ?$N%r tAQS o V, 10 A F' 04 S?no.?Z / Kp, tt Ih,I
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: SJL 1?i ??t So?•r• tom.
General Engineering:
1 . 1. Where is dumpster to be located when not in trash staging area?
2. Install F.H.A. and unrestricted fire line in city street rights-of-way or dedication of an utility
easement will be required prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
3. Fire Department Connection shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the front of the
building and within 40-feet of a Fire Hydrant.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
The following to be addressed prior to building permit:
1. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to
standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.)
Prior to CO:
1. The condominium plat for Bay Esplanade Condominiums shall be recorded with Pinellas
County.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
Dry Detention systems must contain a grassed bottom and designed with no steeper than 4:1 side
slope. Provide cross-section for the pond(s).
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 49
• •
Fire:
1 . By order of Chief of Construction, NO APPROVALS on Bay Esplanade, Skiff Point,
Brightwater, until water supply is improved. All questions regarding this fire comment should
be addressed to Chief of Construction S. C. Strong who can be reached at 727-562-4327 ext
3039. PRIOR TO PERMIT.
2. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required.
Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB.
3 . An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power-for elevators and fire pump.
Must be located above BFE. Emergency lighting should also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB
4. Standpipe connection for dock area must be connected to firepump/wet standpipe system.
Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
5 . Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure adequate
water supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Calculations due PRIOR TO
PERMIT
Harbor Master:
1 . No issues - existing docks being retained.
Legal:
I . No issues.
Land Resources:
I . No Issues.
Landscaping:
I , Edges of the pavement along the parking space and driveway, as well as the southern edge of
the parking spaces and backup flair, must be curbed with vertical curbing for the protection of
landscape materials.
2. Sheet LI.I - Revise Landscaping Note #8, as the minimum size of trees at time of planting is
10-foot tall and 2.5-inch caliper.
Parks and Recreation:
I . No issues.
Stormwater:
I , Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant is to provide a copy of the approved
SWFWMD permit for the proposed site.
Solid Waste:
I . show where recycling carts are placed for resident use
Traffic Engineering:
I , All parking spaces must meet mimimum City standard dimensions. - Columns inside parking
space interefere with standard dimensions.
2. Re-locate handicap parking stall near elevator.
3. Vertical clear height for parking garage must be at a minimum of 8 feet 2 inches (8' 2")
including entrance, route to handicap parking space and exit.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Planning:
General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 50
•
r 1
L_J
1 . Indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures.
2. General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide the value of the site after all site and building
improvements are constructed.
3 . In accordance with City Council directives, the northern 60 feet of this site may be eligible for a
maximum height of 50 feet and the balance of the site eligible for a maximum height of 65 feet.
Additionally, heights above 35 feet are expected to mitigate the increased height through
increased setbacks and/or stepbacks in the building design.
4. This site may be eligible for the Transfer of Development Rights of one dwelling unit.
5. Staff will not support the proposed reduction to the side (south) setback of two feet to pavement.
6. Color in/blacken the columns and walls on the ground floor on the civil plans, much like was
done for the project across the street at 693-699 Bay Esplanade.
7. Potential condition of approval:
That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
8 . Potential condition of approval:
That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits;
9. Potential condition of approval:
That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a
monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and
color of the building;
10. Potential condition of approval:
That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed
underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting
right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of
conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location,
size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering
Department prior to the commencement of work;
11 . Potential condition of approval:
That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy;
12. Potential condition of approval:
That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
13 . Potential condition of approval:
That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
14. Potential condition of approval:
That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
15 . Potential condition of approval:
That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums;
16. Egress from the rear stairwell must be to the outside (cannot go into the parking garage). Pool
fence blocks such egress. Remove fence/provide gate in accordance with Building Code
requirements.
17. Since it appears that the existing dock is being retained, how does one access the dock?
18. Trash staging area drawn parallel to Somerset Street and only touches the driveway at a point.
Reality is that the dumpster must get from the trash room to the staging area and the concrete
trash staging area will be parallel with the edge of the driveway. Revise.
As to the size of the trash staging area, how many dumpsters will fit into the trash room? If only
one, the size of the trash staging area should be close to the size of the dumpster. Revise.
19. Strongly recommend providing two parking spaces per unit.
20. Sheet C2.1 - Provide the dimension from the front property line of Somerset Street to the closest
edge of pavement (without the radius; just from the edge of pavement extended).
21 . Need to remove existing driveways/parking areas within the Bay Esplanade and Somerset
rights-of-way and sod.
22. In lieu of the water feature on the west side, suggest a special landscape feature instead.
23 . Based on the plans submitted for the project across Somerset Street and since it isn't labeled
"mailboxes", it is unclear why the mailboxes are proposed in the open air area of the parking
garage. Mailboxes are generally placed inside the lobby area. Advise/revise.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 51
. I ? 1 0 9
24. Based on the submitted survey and the site plan, it appears that the pavement for the abutting
property is encroaching onto this property by two feet. How is this being addressed? If being
retained, the side (south) setback is zero feet (to existing pavement) and will need an easement to
be recorded over this area of encroachment.
The landscape plan design along this south property line does not take into account this existing
encroaching pavement. Revise.
25 . Elevations - Elevator machine room appears as a square box on top of the structure with a flat
roof, lacking the detail that the stair tower does. Suggest relocating the elevator machine room to
be part of the stair tower with a pitched roof.
26. Elevations - Most balconies appear to be a solid, stuccoed wall with a railing on top. The east
elevation is not as detailed as to what is proposed regarding the balcony. The balcony extends
across the full length of the building but is unclear as to whether the balcony edge is a solid,
stuccoed wall or simply railings. Revise.
27. Elevations - It is unclear is there are any parapets extending above the roof deck, except at the
corners of the building. It is noted that the a/c units are to be located on the top of the building,
but no screening of these units appears to be provided (usually screened by the parapets).
Advise/revise.
28. Elevations - Clarify that the sides of the chimneys (as seen on the east and west elevations) are
stucco, rather than a stone finish.
29. Based on the floor plans submitted, the rear balconies extend to the edge of the rear stairwell.
- However, the south and north elevations do not indicate such, except for the 4th floor.
Revise/advise.
Additionally, the east elevation indicates a tiled overhang/roof structure at the first floor level,
extending approximately four feet from the main structure, as indicated on the east elevation.
This overhang/roof structure is not indicated on the I st floor plan, nor on the site plans for the
overhang/roof structure as a dashed line. Revise/advise.
30. General Applicability criteria #1 response: Ensure the accuracy of the height of the single family
dwellings, stated at between 30 and 40 feet, based on the Base Flood Elevation and the
measurement of height (to flat roof deck or to midpoint of a pitched roof).
31 . Based on the site plan and the building elevations, unclear how this proposal is complying with
the following attached dwelling criteria for the screening of parking: "Off-street parking within
the footprint of the residential building is designed and constricted to create a street level facade
comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on
the ground level." Advise/revise the plans.
32. If the building designs for this site and 693/699 Bay Esplanade are the same, unclear why the
water feature is three feet in width on 693/699 Bay Esplanade and only two feet on this proposal.
Explain/revise.
Other:
No Comments
Notes: To be placed on the 11/15105 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all
above departments' comments by noon, 10/6/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 52
P t
2:00 pm Case Number: FLD2005-08088 -- 685 BAY ESPLANADE
0 'Pm*
Owner(s): Epic Holdings South
139 Bayside Dr
Clearwater, F133767
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Representative: Housh Ghovaee
601 Cleveland Street
Clearwater, F133755
TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: nestech@mindspring.com
Location: 0.312 acres located at the southeast corner of Bay Esplanade and Somerset Street.
Atlas Page: 258A
Zoning District: T, Tourist
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (west)
setback from 15 feet to 13 feet (to water feature), reductions to the front (north) setback along Somerset
Street from 15 feet to 12.67 feet (to building), from 15 feet to xx feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero
feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to proposed
pavement) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from
10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 feet to xx feet (to roof deck) with
an additional xx feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building within the visibility
triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B.
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761
2544 Frisco Drive
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Neighborhood Coral Resort Condominum
Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33767
483 E Shore Drive
TELEPHONE: 727-446-3711, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: coral483@aol.com
Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767
100 Devon Dr
TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III
Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard
Applicant/Rep: Housh Ghovaee, Doreen Williams, Renee Ruggerio
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
1 . 1. Where is dumpster to be located when not in trash staging area?
2. Install F.H.A. and unrestricted fire line in city street rights-of-way or dedication of an utility
easement will be required prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
3. Fire Department Connection shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the front of the
building and within 40-feet of a Fire Hydrant.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
The following to be addressed prior to building permit:
1. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to
standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.)
Prior to CO:
1. The condominium plat for Bay Esplanade Condominiums shall be recorded with Pinellas
County.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
1 . Dry Detention systems must contain a grassed bottom and designed with no steeper than 4:1 side
slope. Provide cross-section for the pond(s).
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 43
Fire:
I , By order of Chief of Construction, NO APPROVALS on Bay Esplanade, Skiff Point,
Brightwater, until water supply is improved. All questions regarding this fire comment should
be addressed to Chief of Construction S. C. Strong who can be reached at 727-562-4327 ext
3039. PRIOR TO PERMIT.
2. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required.
Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB.
3 . An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump.
Must be located above BFE. Emergency lighting should also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB
4. Standpipe connection for dock area must be connected to firepump/wet standpipe system.
Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
5 . Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure adequate
water supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Calculations due PRIOR TO
PERMIT
Harbor Master:
1 . No issues - existing docks being retained.
Legal:
1 _ No issues.
Land Resources:
1 No Issues.
Landscaping:
1 . Edges of the pavement along the parking space and driveway, as well as the southern edge of
the parking spaces and backup flair, must be curbed with vertical curbing for the protection of
landscape materials.
2. Sheet L 1.1 - Revise Landscaping Note #8, as the minimum size of trees at time of planting is
10-foot tall and 2.5-inch caliper.
Parks and Recreation:
1 . No issues.
Stormwater:
1 , Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant is to provide a copy of the approved
SWFWMD permit for the proposed site.
Solid Waste:
I , show where recycling carts are placed for resident use
Traffic Engineering:
1 . All parking spaces must meet mimimum City standard dimensions. - Columns inside parking
space interefere with standard dimensions.
2. Re-locate handicap parking stall near elevator.
3. Vertical clear height for parking garage must be at a minimum of 8 feet 2 inches (8' 2")
including entrance, route to handicap parking space and exit.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Planning:
General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 44
1 . Indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures.
2 . General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide the value of the site after all site and building
improvements are constructed.
3 . In accordance with City Council directives, the northern 60 feet of this site may be eligible for a
maximum height of 50 feet and the balance of the site eligible for a maximum height of 65 feet.
Additionally, heights above 35 feet are expected to mitigate the increased height through
increased setbacks and/or stepbacks in the building design.
4. This site may be eligible for the Transfer of Development Rights of one dwelling unit.
5 . Staff will not support the proposed reduction to the side (south) setback of two feet to pavement.
6. Color in/blacken the columns and walls on the ground floor on the civil plans, much like was
done for the project across the street at 693-699 Bay Esplanade.
7. Potential condition of approval:
That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
8 . Potential condition of approval:
That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits;
9. Potential condition of approval:
That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a
monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and
color of the building;
10. Potential condition of approval:
That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed
underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting
right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of
conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location,
size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering
Department prior to the commencement of work;
11 . Potential condition of approval:
That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy;
12 . Potential condition of approval:
That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
13 . Potential condition of approval:
That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
14. Potential condition of approval:
That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
15 . Potential condition of approval:
That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums;
16. Egress from the rear stairwell must be to the outside (cannot go into the parking garage). Pool
fence blocks such egress. Remove fence/provide gate in accordance with Building Code
requirements.
17 . Since it appears that the existing dock is being retained, how does one access the dock?
18 . Trash staging area drawn parallel to Somerset Street and only touches the driveway at a point.
Reality is that the dumpster must get from the trash room to the staging area and the concrete
trash staging area will be parallel with the edge of the driveway. Revise.
As to the size of the trash staging area, how many dumpsters will fit into the trash room? If only
one, the size of the trash staging area should be close to the size of the dumpster. Revise.
19 . Strongly recommend providing two parking spaces per unit.
20. Sheet C2.1 - Provide the dimension from the front property line of Somerset Street to the closest
edge of pavement (without the radius; just from the edge of pavement extended).
21 . Need to remove existing driveways/parking areas within the Bay Esplanade and Somerset
rights-of-way and sod.
22 . In lieu of the water feature on the west side, suggest a special landscape feature instead.
23 . Based on the plans submitted for the project across Somerset Street and since it isn't labeled
"mailboxes", it is unclear why the mailboxes are proposed in the open air area of the parking
garage. Mailboxes are generally placed inside the lobby area. Advise/revise.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 45
p
24 . Based on the submitted survey and the site plan, it appears that the pavement for the abutting
property is encroaching onto this property by two feet. How is this being addressed? If being
retained, the side (south) setback is zero feet (to existing pavement) and will need an easement to
be recorded over this area of encroachment.
The landscape plan design along this south property line does not take into account this existing
encroaching pavement. Revise.
25 . Elevations - Elevator machine room appears as a square box on top of the structure with a flat
roof, lacking the detail that the stair tower does. Suggest relocating the elevator machine room to
be part of the stair tower with a pitched roof.
26. Elevations - Most balconies appear to be a solid, stuccoed wall with a railing on top. The east
elevation is not as detailed as to what is proposed regarding the balcony. The balcony extends
across the full length of the building but is unclear as to whether the balcony edge is a solid,
stuccoed wall or simply railings. Revise.
27 . Elevations - It is unclear is there are any parapets extending above the roof deck, except at the
corners of the building. It is noted that the a/c units are to be located on the top of the building,
but no screening of these units appears to be provided (usually screened by the parapets).
Advise/revise.
28 . Elevations - Clarify that the sides of the chimneys (as seen on the east and west elevations) are
stucco, rather than a stone finish.
29. Based on the floor plans submitted, the rear balconies extend to the edge of the rear stairwell.
However, the south and north elevations do not indicate such, except for the 4th floor.
Revise/advise.
Additionally, the east elevation indicates a tiled overhang/roof structure at the first floor level,
extending approximately four feet from the main structure, as indicated on the east elevation.
This overhang/roof structure is not indicated on the 1 st floor plan, nor on the site plans for the
overhang/roof structure as a dashed line. Revise/advise.
30 . General Applicability criteria #1 response: Ensure the accuracy of the height of the single family
dwellings, stated at between 30 and 40 feet, based on the Base Flood Elevation and the
measurement of height (to flat roof deck or to midpoint of a pitched roof).
31 . Based on the site plan and the building elevations, unclear how this proposal is complying with
the following attached dwelling criteria for the screening of parking: "Off-street parking within
the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade
comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on
the ground level." Advise/revise the plans.
32 . If the building designs for this site and 693/699 Bay Esplanade are the same, unclear why the
water feature is three feet in width on 693/699 Bay Esplanade and only two feet on this proposal.
Explain/revise.
Other:
No Comments
Notes: To be placed on the 11/15/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all
above departments' comments by noon, 10/6/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 46
•
•
Wells, Wayne
From: Kambourolias, Sam
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 1:43 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: RE: Map Request for 685-689 Bay Esplanade
®
L-J
® ®J
zone.doc location.doc FLD Map request existing.doc aerial.doc
form.doc
Soto Kambourolias
CAD Technician
City Of Clearwater
(727) 562-4769
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 3:28 PM
To: Kambourolias, Sam
Cc: Herman, Jason
Subject: Map Request for 685-689 Bay Esplanade
Sam -
Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-08088 for the property at 685-689 Bay Esplanade. I will bring over the
paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep.
Thanks-
Wayne
<< File: FLD Map request form.doc >>
1
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 3:28 PM
To: Kambourolias, Sam
Cc: Herman, Jason
Subject: Map Request for 685-689 Bay Esplanade
Sam -
Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-08088 for the property at 685-689 Bay Esplanade. I will bring over the
paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep.
Thanks-
Wayne
FLD Map request
form.doc
FL Otoos• o
? 249A 249B
>f> ,2 $ ASTER SrREET gCITY OF CLEARWATER
n 4 nt - _ >a4 m _ AND VICINITY
PIN- COUNTY FLORIDA
" m 8 >or ? 23 $22
W
3 >ra ACACIA
2 Toe ER y $
a, $a 4 3 2 , ao
1 >04
2 4 5 C
I o enl-T tt
I
I
I
4
Ot
C
(V
O
lT
O
N
O
N
M
r'l
Oy
O
Ln
N
i
In
EO
M
i
c
.c
v
i
V) L
I
P.
*THE CAY T
CLW. REACH
CONDO 111 -78
I
118
7
61910 n
11 ` ao
:yam _ 74f -
?
< 9 1 12 ore cols 5 6 ce ?. t
e t3Q°z ` 4 PENTHOUSE
a81
SHORES ?
n
7 7 14 ee C
' gi
5 3 COHOO
lY 15eJ4 as 2 13 t1 681 70-69 era
ae Srfl t6 cola 1 a L 72 8a0 e
T5+ r. 17 apA 7
S a3 . t8e4e S. 3 %
19 T $ 3
ee 4 5 6
ao j
1 ? . 20
tc
pp t
$ ROYAL g WAY
etas 9 3
2 0.te 4kt 12
f1 11 10 9 6 7
4 9
022 e?F a a e o w?.
ESPI;ANApE g
6 c
I Qsg au 60
13 t sb 10E 11 sit
741 244 ~ i
B 17
9
?
?
.
?e
t
O6. 8
22
pJA
1 4 5 6
2 11 804
2 a t
rnJ?, A 2
tt ?.. oaf 13,00 _..
ao 44'_2
i 14
14 t3
t Q ADP 699 1
V
Ic
ENDAU = sT
;aNAMTA
116-
IS
A 964
'
S7" aep
t .
16
f? n \
?
J
\I >° 0 $ $ $ 8
Q13 4 5 8 9
..
2
aer
5
C.
E 5.1
< a+a 17a>4
f
d
'^
vl 1 15 14 13 11 10
V 8 3
n 4 Iii a . 7 6
{/Gy v3 18698
5
eo y a 1g
O BAY FSPCANAOE
to
? ? n
t
3
TION
F(2) 146 , tl
J-
2
$ ba
oar
CLEARWATER BEACH REC, COMPLEX
OS/ R
1
aa4 33/0
_?
a
u? M NDALAY
PARK
'
.C4 pw >00-tat
4a s>-,n
on ,w
z O twJ C / It
as snm Q P
40
E ROCKAWAY $ STREW s
0 MIL
s ® BELLE HARBOR
UD _
ale
12 10 91 6 Ise
126
- lb
VTVTVT"'
..e4,atl. N T,lR °?V
3 nit @ 10
6 5 6 7 6 9
CO 14 t 1 I 10
e -aa m . s$ Z, W
$
r 1Areemr. ]. I
7Q0
161AWD G PREPARED BY
s PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
WAY
6-
? yRIM+?//
CD ^ ENGINEERING
7 VVV??- 100 S. NKtie Ava. Cleormiter. FL 33756
Pn.: (727)562-4750. Fox: (727)526-4755
hilp://wew.cieorwater-O.can/Clly_oepoftmenis/Publk_w ks/eng[neer/
Dlaclolmen
el
T Public Informollon doto 1a furnished by the City of Cleorwoler
61'
??? Publle Works Adm,nisir.tion/Engineefinq and must be occepled
and used by the feclplenl with the undefetonding loot the dot.
ecelmol vas collected for the purpou of developing o graphic
fnfroeiruclure Inventory. As such, the City of Clearwater PWA/E
makes oo worroniks, eapre496d of Implied, nceming toe
eom01HM<aa. reliabloty, or salt blllty of thls dote for
Eaccuracy.her "`Plel.l use. Furihermofe, the City of Cleor..ate,
PWA/E as limes no I'wblllly wnotaaever asabclaled wlil, the use
ml.eeaof euch dale.
N
l ° ? to periodic enangea. r
Tnia Atlas page is >ub
For lofarmatlon about laiesl revidona please toll PWA/E o
an .u, Web site.
I
I N
I 0 100 200 400 600
SCALE: 1" = 400'
LEGEND:
I
I
00 O BLOCK NUMBER
(J1 1234 LOT ADDRESS
00
P
-? CITY LIMITS LINE
I
SHADED AREA -PROPERTY
OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS
AGREEMENT TO ANNEX
? CITY OWNED PROPERTY
I
i MDR ZONING DESIGNATION
?t11 I ZONE LINE
REZONE ORD
p ..7t ,Die,/e>
C CWm[RIWI 09/2./92
I
REVISED:
09/09/2002
ZONING ATLAS
SW 1 /4 OF SECTION Q /?
2678A 5 - 29S- 15 E 8A
vision of Corporations
• Page 1 of 2
?li?1?+ }?? "4. ?t7Y ?t?F It ifE?} y€?7K7`Fr,?? Y J I:?R 51?I7?`F"{?F`i i ????L F 4??# ~ r
"au,?.. 34... rk ? 'SS- F -?6. > e? y. +. ? t 4 3.. `*rs- ?k s B A E t'lcd.
Y17 11
Florida Limited Liability
PETER PAN DEVELOPMENTS LLC
PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
767 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
Changed 04/22/2005
MAILING ADDRESS
767 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
Changed 04/22/2005
Document Number FEI Number
L03000045378 200711485
State Status
FL ACTIVE
Last Event Event Date Filed
AMENDED AND 06/17/2004
RESTATED ARTICLES
Total Contribution
0.00
Reizistered Ap-ent
Date Filed
11/18/2003
Effective Date
NONE
Event Effective Date
NONE
Name & Address
VASILOUDES, PANOS
767 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
Name Changed: 04/22/2005
Address Changed: 04/22/2005
Manager/Member Detail
11 Name & Address Title '
MEROLI, PETRIT
http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&n1=L03000045378&n2=NAMFWD... 9/ 1 /2005
. -- division of Corporations
• • Page 2 of 2
767 BAY ESPLANADE
MGRM
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
VASILOUDES, PANOS
767 BAY ESPLANADE MGRM
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
Previous Filing 9 Return to List Next Filing
View Events
No Name History Information
Document Images
Listed below are the images available for this filing.
04/22/2005 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP
06/17/2004 -- Amended and Restated Articles
04/19/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT
11/18/2003 -- Florida Limited Liability
Annual Reports
Report Year IF- Filed Date
2004 17-04/19/2004
2005 04/22/2005
THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT
i Corporations Inquiry
s
Corporations Help
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&nl =L03000045378&n2=NAMFWD... 9/1/2005
Di?-i:ion of Corporations • Pagel of 2
di.I
71171..;1; P?t????ic: I??clui??f
Florida Limited Liability
EPIC HOLDINGS SOUTH, LLC
PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
139 BAYSIDE DR.
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
MAILING ADDRESS
139 BAYSIDE DR.
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
Document Number FEI Number
L03000013295 861050936
State Status
FL ACTIVE
Total Contribution
0.00
Registered Agent
Date Filed
04/14/2003
Effective Date
NONE
Name & Address
ZIOLA, THOMAS
139 BAYSIDE DR.
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
Manaizer/Member Detail
Titl
e
Name & Address
ZIOLA, THOMAS
139 BAYSIDE DR P
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
Annual Reports
Report Year Filed Date
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/eordet.exe?al=DETFIL&n1=LO3000013295&n2=NAMFV D... 9/1/2005
Division of Corporations 0
• Page 2 of 2
I I 2004 11 03/01/2004 1 I
2005 07/11/2005
Previous Filing Return to List Next Filing
No Events
No Name History Information
Document Images
Listed below are the images available for this filing.
07/11/2005 -- ANN REWLNIFORM BUS REP
03/01/2004 -- ANN REWUNIFORM BUS REP
04/14/2003 -- Florida Limited Liabilites
THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT
I Corporations Inquiry i
_E
Corporatim help
-ts
http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet. exe?a 1=DETFIL&n 1=LO3000013295 &n2=NAMF WD... 9/1/2005
.Pinellas County Property App r Information: 05 29 15 54756 076 0 Page 2 of 6
ai A 0 40
05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 077 / 0130
30-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:38:23
Owr-iership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales
PETER PAN DEV OBK; 13254 OPG; 0430
610 MANDALAY HE
CLEARWATER FL 33767-1632
EVAC: A EUAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr; 689 BAY ESPLANADE
of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract; 260.02
2003 - 2004
l
f
;
sa
es
rom
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 12/2,003 13,254/ 430 1,250,000 (0) I
1929; Book 020 Pgs 048- 3 /1,994 8,595/ 350 225,000 (U) I
0000: Book Pgs - 1 /1,994 8,538/1,205 420,000 (C) I
0000: Book Pgs - 6 /1,992 7,952/1,947 370,000 (C) I
2005 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market; 760,000 Homestead; NO Ownership % 000
Govt Exem; NO Use %: .250
Assessed/Cap; 760,000 Institutional Exem; NO Tax Exempt; .000
Historic Exem: 0
Taxable: 760,000 Agricultural: 0
2004 Tax Information
District: Cu Seawall; Frontage: Bay
Clearwater, View;
05 tylillage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
04 Taxes: 17,456.74
1) 60 x 110 100. 00 6,600. 00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 00 00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
17, 660. 27 6) 0 x 0 00 00
Without any exemptions,
2005 taxes will be ;
17, 660.27
Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 77, L OT 13 AS DESC IN
Description PL 20 P6 27
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l&a=l&b=l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/30/2005
Pinellas County Property App r Information: 05 29 15 54756 076 06 Page 3 of 6
& It
. Bu d_n.gl
. Building.2.
Building #1
05 / 29 / 15 / 54756 / 077 / 0130 :01
30-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:38:23
Commercial Card 01 of 2 Improvement Type: Hult Res Apt C4 St
Property Address: 689 BAY ESPLANADE Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39
Structural E1oBmoBnlzs
Foundation Continuous Footing
Floor System Wood W/ Subfloor
Exterior.Wall Cone Block/Stucco
Height Factor 0
Party Wall None
Structural Frame None
Roof Frame Flat
Roof Cover Built Up/Composition
Cabinet. & Mill Average
Floor Finish Carpet Combination
Interior Finish Plaster Furred
Total Units 13
Heating & Air Unit Heater
Fixtures 33
Bath Tile Floor and Wall
Electric Average
Shape Factor Rectangle
Quality Average
Year Built 1,951
Effective Age 30
Other Depreciation 0
Function Depreciation 0
Economic Depreciation 0
Sub Arcas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1.00 2,470 7) 00 0
2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 2,170 8) .00 0
3) 00 0 9) 00 0
4.) 00 0 10) 00 0
5) 00 0 11) . 00 0
6) 00 0 12) 00 0
Ccmmtercial Extra Fsatur?s
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 7X200 1.50 1,400 2,100 2,100 999
2) PATIO/DECK 434 10. 00 434 4,340 1,740 1,970
3) DOCK 344 SF 15. 00 344 5,160 2,060 1, 970
4) PATIO/DECK 475SF 3. 00 475 1,430 570 1,970
5) 00 0 0 0 0
6) 00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 6,470
Building #2
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/egi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/30/2005
Pinellas County Property App r Information: 05 29 15 54756 076 0? Page 4 of 6
05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 077 / 0130 :02
30-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:38:24
Commercial Card 02 of 2 Improvement Type: Motels Res Const
Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39
Structural Elcmcnts
Foundation Continuous Footing
Floor System Slab on Grade
Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco
Height Factor 0
Party Wall None
Structural Frame None
Roof Frame Flat
Roof Cover Built Up/Composition
Cabinet & Mill Average
Floor Finish Carpet Combination
Interior Finish Paneling Average
Total Units 0
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 3
Bath Tile None
Electric Average
Shape Factor Rectangle
Quality Average
Year Built 1,951
Effective Age 30
Other Depreciation 0
Function Depreciation 0
Economic Depreciation 0
Sub ArcaS
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1.00 288 7) 00 0
2) Open Porch 15 30 8) 00 0
3) 00 0 9) 00 0
4) .00 0 10) 00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) 00 0 12) 00 0
Commercial E x t r a IP cat ur e S
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) . 00 0 0 0 0
2) 00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
F*_1FEf1TFqFq
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/30/2005
Pinellas County Property App r Information: 05 29 15 54756 076 0 Page 5 of 6
V
Q C. C I S J'?VT .., ST 11 B 111
S.7 kPLANADI
STREET
a
r
STREET
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
- 279,42
http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/30/2005
Pinellas County Property App r Information: 05 29 15 54756 076 0
_a
Page 6 of 6
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/30/2005
z Has County Property App r Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 0 Page 2 of 5
05 / 25 / 15 / 54750 / 077 / 0120
30-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:38:46
Ownership Information Residential Property A ddress, Use, and Sales
EPIC HOLDINGS SOUTH OBK: 12676 OPG: 0642
139 BAYSIDE OR
CLEARWATER FL 33767-2502
EVAC: A EVAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 685 BAY ESPLANADE
of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 260.02
fr
l
2003 - 2004
sa
es
om
:
844,600 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 4 /2,003 12,6761 642 377,400 (Q) I
1929: Book 020 Pgs 048-. 0 /1,967 2,575/ 462 2,450 (U) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { )
2005 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market; 693,100 Homestead: NO Ownership % 000
Govt Exem; NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 693,100 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000
Historic Exem; 0
Taxable: 693,100 Agricultural: 0
2004 Tax Information
District: Cu Seawall: YES Frontage: Bay
Clearwater View:
05 Millage; 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units hyleth
04 Taxes: 7,805.00
1) 64 x 110 11,000. 00 64. 00 F
Special Tax 00 2) 0 x 0 00 00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
16,105.70 6) 0 x 0 00 00
Without any exemptions,
2005 taxes will be
16, 105.70
Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 77, LOT 12 AS DESC IN
Description PL 20 PG 27 & N 5FT OF LOT it
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/30/2005
P;. ellas County Property App0r Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 0 Page 3 of 5
05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 077 / 0120 :01
30-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFR Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:38:47
Residential Card 01 of 1 Prop Use; 220 Land Use; 08 Living Units; 2
Imp Type; Duplex/Triplex Prop Address: 685 BAY ESPLANADE
Structural E1?m?nts
Foundation Continuous Wall
Floor System Slab on Grade
Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco/Reclad
Roof Frame Flat-Shed
Roof Cover B U Tar&Gravel/Othr
# Stories 1.0
Floor Finish Crpt/Unyl/SftWd/Terr
Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster
Quality Average
Year Built 1,951
Effective Age 35
Heating Unit/Spc/W1/F1 Furn
Cooling None
Fixtures 6
Other Depreciation 0
Functional Depreciation 0
Econonomic Depreciation 0
Sub Aromas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 1,434 7) 00 0
2) Open Porch 20 220 3) 00 0
3) Detached Garage 35 288 9) .00 0
4) 00 0 10) 00 0
5) 00 0 11) 00 0
6) 00 0 12) 00 0
RiF_-sid(-_ntial Extra F?aturs
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) DOCK 168 15.00 168 2,520 1,010 11951
2) 00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) 00 0 0 0 0
5) . 00 0 0 0 0
6) 00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 1,010
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
®Ft-1 ® Fq FI-1-1
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/30/2005
,. 1iwellas County Property App0r Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 0 Page 4 of 5
STREET
T?
STREET
27942
_ -1
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/30/2005
Ifilellas County Property Appoer Information: 05 29 15 54756 077 OI??Q
http://pao.co.pineIlas.fl.us/htbin/egi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&
Page 5 of 5
8/30/2005
e
•
•
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public
hearings on Tuesday, November 15, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council
Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the
following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the
meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property
owners etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the
beginning of the meeting.
1. Jerry and Teresa Tas are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 17 attached
dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 78 ft (to roof
deck) with an additional 14 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to
the front (north) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the minimum lot
width from 100 ft to 67.5 ft along Coronado Dr and to 71.64 ft along Hamden Dr as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed
Use: Attached dwellings) at 342 Hamden Dr and 343 Coronado Dr, Columbia Sub No 2, Blk
A, Lot 11 & part of Lot 10, and Columbia Sub No 3, Lot 7 and part of Lot 6. Assigned Planner:
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07066
2. Griffin International, Inc. is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit Alcoholic
Beverage Sales in the Commercial (C) District on a parcel of land contiguous to a parcel of land
which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project per Sec 2-704.C. (Proposed Use: Alcoholic Beverage Sales) at 1575 Highland Ave S,
Sec 23-29-15, M&B 34.03. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner M. FLD2005-08082
3. Beach & Gulf Sands, Inc, and North Clearwater Beach Development, LLC (Anthony
Menna) are requesting 1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (11 existing
attached dwelling units to remain where a maximum of 10 attached dwelling units would be
permitted under current Code); 2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03019) of 2
dwelling units from 116 Brightwater Dr under the provisions of Secs 4-1402 and 4-1403; and 3)
Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwelling units in the Tourist (T) District
with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 59.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 42 inches for
perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 2 ft (to
pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), a reduction
to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 1.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback
from 20 ft to 10 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pool deck), and to allow 5 parking spaces to
encroach within the required sight visibility triangles along Bay Esplanade as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed
Use: Attached Dwellings) at 657 & 663 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77,
Lots 4-5. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-08087
4. 400 Cleveland LLC, Mainstreet Clearwater Development, and Whtbuff, Inc (TH
Management, LLC, Laura Street Development, LLC) are requesting Flexible Development
approval to permit a mixed-use development in the Downtown (D) District with 245 attached
dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater
Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 186,300 sq ft of non-
residential floor area (restaurant, retail/movie theater, and existing office), an increase in the
0' 0
permitted height from 30 ft to 380 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 27 ft for architectural
embellishments as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-
903.C. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (245 attached dwellings, 98,500 sq ft retail/restaurant/movie
theatre, and 87,800 sq ft office)] at 400, 410, 418, & 420 Cleveland St and 416 Laura St, Sec
16-29-15, M&B 12-03, Earl & Tate's Sub Lots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9-10, 19-21 and part of lots 2, 4, 6, 8,
11, 17, & 18. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-08084
5. Ronald E & Karen L Kozan (Newkirk Ventures Inc) are requesting a Flexible Development
approval to permit the addition of a pool to a previously approved attached dwelling project
(FLD2005-05045, approved August 16, 2005) in the Medium High Density Residential (NH-IDR)
District with a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), as a
Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F. [Proposed Use: Attached
dwellings (26 condominiums) with pool] at 405 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit
2, Lot 15 & S %i of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-
08086
6. Dam Devon LLC (City of Clearwater) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to
permit a parking lot in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to minimum lot area from 20,000
sq ft to 16,500 sq ft, a reduction to the front (north along Devon Dr/First Ave) setback from 25 ft
to 15 ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Dr) setback from 25 ft to
15 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Public parking lot for 25 parking spaces) at 41 Devon Dr,
Columbia Sub, Blk B, E %z of Lot 1. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III.
FLD2005-08089
7. Peter Pan Developments LLC (Panayiotis Vasiloudes, Petrit Meroli, Somerset
Condominium) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 8 attached dwellings in
the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area
from 15,000 sq ft to 13,087 sq ft, reductions to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 120 ft along
Bay Esplanade and from 150 ft to 110 ft along Somerset St, a reduction to the front (west)
setback from 25 ft to 22 ft (to water feature), reductions to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to
11 ft (to building and pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the
side (north) setback from 10 ft to 3.1 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from
10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 46.83 ft (to roof deck) with
an additional 4.17 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building within the
visibility triangles, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.17, and a
reduction to the landscape buffer along Bay Esplanade from 5 ft to 3 ft (for the retention pond
planting area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Somerset St from 10 ft to zero ft (to trash
staging area) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 10 ft to
3.1 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Plan, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G.
v
[Proposed `nade Mandalay__
Use: Attached dwellings (8 condominiums)]at` 693-699 Bay, Esplanade
Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 76 & unplatted Blk 76. Assigned Planner.`-Wayne=M Wells,°AICP,
Planner III. FLD2005-08090
8. Peter Pan Development LLC & Epic Holdings South LLC (Bay Esplanade Condominium)
are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 8 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T)
District with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 13 ft (to water feature),
reductions to the front (north) setback along Somerset St from 15 ft to 12.67 ft (to building), from
15 ft to 9.83 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the
side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 ft to
0 0
46.83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to
permit the building within the visibility triangles, under the . provisions of Sec 2-803.B.
[Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (8 condominiums)] at 685-689 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay
Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 12-13, & part of Lot 11. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells,
AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-08088
9. Jaycee Roth is requesting an appeal of an administrative determination denying the ability to
apply for an Animal Boarding Facility use as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the
Downtown East Gateway Character District, per Sec 3-502. (Proposed Use: Animal Boarding
Use) at 1242 Cleveland St, Padgett's Estates Sub Lot 3 & parts of Lots 2 & 4. Assigned
Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. APP2005-00002
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or
objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides
to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at
such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community
Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial
cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party
status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine
witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and
obtained during the case discussion before the CDB.
An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public
hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and
spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB
shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the
Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be
available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL
33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about
the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
Michael Delk
Planning Director
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS
MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST.
Ad: 10/30/05
G g- / FLD2005-0 88 - 105
1066363 ONTARIO LTD AMERPOL HOTELS & MOTELS INC
152 CLARENDON ST 428 MINER ST
SOUTHAMPTON ON NOH 21-0 00030 - BENSENVILLE IL 60106 - 2657
CANADA
ARMBRUSTER, JOHN
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 209
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535
BANNON, MARY KATHLEEN TRUST
8013 WILDWOOD LN
DARIEN IL 60561 - 5914
BEARDSLEY, JAMES M
15 MAYFAIR LN
BUFFALO NY 14201 - 1522
BOYES, JAMES R
BOYES, GEORGIA
969 BRUCE AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1013
BUNDY, RUSSELL H
NORGORDT, HANNAH K
42 SOMERSET ST
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1543
CIUCEVICH, JOSEPH
736 BRUCE AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1418
COMB, JEAN J
287 PILGRIM
BIRMINGHAM MI 48009 - 4610
CZIPRI, BRENDA K THE
334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338
PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427
DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC
90 MILVAN DR
TORONTO ON M91 1Z6 00030 -
CANADA
BERETA, STANLEY D THE
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 203
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535
BROUZET, THIERRY M
57 ASTER ST
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1407
BUNDY, THOMAS C
43 ACACIA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1404
Clearwater Beach Association
Jay Keyes
100 Devon Drive
Clearwater, FL 33767
COQUINA APTS INC
692 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1500
D'ARRIGO, STEPHEN V
11 ARLENE AVE
WILMINGTON MA 01887 - 1111
DOM, MARY
65 SOMERSET ST
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1547
W
46 ARDENT INTERNATIONAL LTD LIABI
2840 WEST BAY DR # 363
BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL 33770 - 2620
BEACH & GULF SANDS INC
657 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1515
BOERNER, SUSANA B
112 S LAUBER WAY
TAMPA FL 33609 - 2615
BROWN, DEBRA P
GARRICK, EARL T
723 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409
CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN
55 SOMERSET ST # 3
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546
Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Doug Williams, President
2544 Frisco Drive
Clearwater, FL 33761
Coral Resort Condominium
Peggy Harnung
483 East Shore Drive
Clearwater, FL 33767
DE BELLIS, BARBARA
55 SOMERSET ST # 3
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546
EPIC HOLDINGS SOUTH
139 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502
EYLER, CYNTHIA A FERGUSON, MELODIE A FITZGERALD, RONALD
HOLDEN, DONNA L PENNOCK, ROBERT M 665 POINSETTIA AVE
554 ADALINE AVE 665 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1530
VANDALIA OH 45377 - 1802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1598
FIVE PALM CONDO ASSN INC
673 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503
•FOLEY, DONALD F
FOLEY, CATHERINE G
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 108
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534
FRIARS MINOR ORD OF ST FRANCIS HALGREN, RALPH W
PROVINCIAL CURIA HALGREN, VELORA B
147 THOMPSON ST 56 SOMERSET ST
NEW YORK NY 10012 - 3110 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1543
HESSELSCHWERDT, BERND J
HESSELSCHWERDT, BERNHARD
55 SOMERSET ST # 5
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546
HILDEBRAND, WILLIAM O JR
661 POINSETTIA AVE# 107
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534
HORGAN, DANIEL B
HORGAN, ROISIN A
710 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1408
KELLEY, PAUL
KELLEY, TRACEY
667 BAY ESPLANDE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1550
KROMER, JOHN
KROMER, JANET
10317 GREEN LINKS DR
TAMPA FL 33626 - 5400
LENTRICCHIA, DOMENICK
LENTRICCHIA, KARIN
814 NARCISSUS AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334
LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH
LEWINSKI, HANNA
60 SOMERSET # 3
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1543
LONG, MARIAN C
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 104
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534
Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
KEYS, RANDALL A
6713 E WHITEWAY DR
TAMPA FL 33617 - 3216
LA RISA DEVELOPMENT CO LLC
880 MANDALAY AVE # C 908
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1219
LETOURNEAU, WILLIAM T
HIRSCH, DEBORA A
395 16TH ST
NEWPORT MN 55055 - 1061
LITTLER, BRUCE C
LITTLER, CAROL A
711 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409
MASTORIDES, NICHOLAS
MASTORIDES, LACEY
2187 VIOLA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3738
0
FORLINI, DOMENICO G
808 MANDALAY AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1324
HAYS, WILLIAM D
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 304
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1536
HOLDEN, ROBERT L
12 STILLWATER HEIGHTS DR
WEST BOYLSTON MA 01583 - 1122
JAKSCH, ROBERT W
1596 SHIRLEY PL
LARGO FL 33770 - 2218
KIELMANN, LOTHAR E
KIELMANN, WENDY
35154 LEON ST
LIVONIA MI 48150 - 2668
LEARY, EDWARD B JR THE
PMB 331
30 JERICHO TPKE
COMMACK NY 11725 - 3009
LEWINSKI, HANNA
LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH
661 POINSETTA AVE #306
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537
LOCKE, WILLIAM R
47 ACACIA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1404
MAVITY, LEON L
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 307
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537
MC FADDEN, ARLENE S MC KINNEY, CARMELLA C MC SWEENEY, GARY W
MC FADDEN, ROBERT G MC KINNEY, GEORGE L MC SWEENEY, CARMEN
661 POINSETTIA AVE #204 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 210 20942 E GLEN HAVEN CIR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 NORTHVILLE MI 48167 - 2465
MEROLI, PETRIT
967 ELDORADO AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1020
MORRISON, GEORGE ROBERT
ALBERT
115 ARGYLE
KIRKLAND QC H9H 31-19 00030 -
CANADA
NEIL, MARIE-THERESE
31 ISLAND WAY # 201
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2205
PALMA, GEORGE
32 FORGE DR
DOWNSVIEW ON
CANADA
M3N 2R3 00030 -
PETER PAN DEV
610 MANDALAY NE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1632
PUTYRSKI, ANNE M
56 ACACIA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1405
ROBERDS, ROGER O
ROBERDS, ELEANOR A
715 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409
SAGONIAS, NICK EST
235 OLD OAK CIR
PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5862
SILLASEN, SEAJAYE
12313 W LOUISIANA AVE
LAKEWOOD CO 80228 - 3829
MERRIAM, RICHARD P
717 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409
MOSSER, RICHARD S
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 301
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1536
NICHOLAS, JERRY
3002 STRAWBERRY RD #OFC
PASADENA TX 77502 - 5230
PASQUALE, JACK R THE
PASQUALE, PATRICIA A THE
1433 NORMAN DR
DARIEN IL 60561 - 4434
PIOLI, RICHARD T THE
PIOLI, ROBERTA B THE
750 ISLAND WAY # 402
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
I?
MERRITT, GORDON E
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 201
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535
MURPHY, VICKI A
FALASKY, DOROTHY A
PO BOX 3505
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 -
8505
NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH
DEVELOP
PO BOX 4189
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189
PENTHOUSE SHORES ASSN INC
661 POINSETTIA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1561
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
ASSOCIATES
12003 LILLIAN AVE
1820 SEMINOLE FL 33778 - 3504
RADAY, DAVID M
YOUNG,SEAN
12003 LILLIAN AVE N
SEMINOLE FL 33778 - 3504
ROLLINSON, ANN C
1364 ELLINGTON RD
SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 - 2600
SAGONIAS, STAMATINA
235 OLD OAK CIR
PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5862
SMITH, MARK A
SMITH, CHARLENE S
701 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409
RHOADS, JEFFREY L THE
PO BOX 861
DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0861
ROZENITS, FRED
ROZENITS, ANNA
31 ISLAND WAY # 1002
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2207
SEIFERT, MICHAEL E
SEIFERT, NANCY S
5825 PERSIMMON DR
MADISON WI 53711 - 5003
SMITH, RUPERT W JR
SMITH, IRENE V
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 106
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534
SONDERMANN, WILFRIED &
SNO-BIRD PROP INC HELGARD SPEAR, ROBERT E THE
10 PRINCE ST SONDERMANN, WILFRIED BEN 102 CARRIAGE SQUARE CT
CUMBERLAND CTR ME 04021 - 4007 52 ACACIA ST HENDERSONVILLE NC 28791 - 1396
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1405
SPERELAKIS, NICHOLAS SR
SPERELAKIS, DOLORES J
12114 PAULMEADOWS DR
CINCINNATI OH 45249 - 1330
VASILOUDES, PANAYIOTIS
VASILOUDES, HELEN
767 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1412
WELPTON, MARY ELIZABETH
462 MAIN ST STE 300
WATERTOWN MA 02472 - 2246
•
SPRING TIDE INVESTMENTS II LLC
622 BYPASS DR STE 100
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5002
VERBAN,STEVE
VERBAN, HELEN K
55 SOMERSET ST
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546
WEYANT, JAMES R III
CARDONI-WEYANT, KRISTI A
51 ACACIA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1404
OHOMPSON, MICHAEL S
THOMPSON, MARIA
BRENDON FEN POND RD IGTHEHM
NEAR SEVEN OAKS
KENT TN15 9JE 00003 -
GREAT BRITAIN
WELLS, DARCY
NALEY, STEPHEN
705 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409
WHITE, ANDREA P
55 SOMERSET ST # 4
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546
WICKY, JERRY E WINCHESTER, GARY WOSCHITZ, EVA THE
WICKY, BETTY W WINCHESTER, PAMELA 302 POINSETTIA LAND TRUST
PO BOX 1191 17111 HANNA RD 10 COURTWOOD PL
OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 1191 LUTZ FL 33549 - 5666 TORONTO ON M2K 1Z9 00030 -
CANADA
11) *
Sensational Sand
z °
3
N
Reliable White
3
N
Verona White JATWU8003
Unsealed
Joints: Drystack
Color: Wheat
CITY OF CLEARW,,'-AT'-F,-R
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
April 18, 2007
Ms. Kathy Ziola
610 Mandalay Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33767
RE: FLD2005-08088 - 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade
Time Extension Development Order
Dear Ms. Ziola:
On April 17, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to
extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit to construct the site
improvements on your parcel at 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade shall be submitted by May 15, 2008.
All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance
of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be
unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above
referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the
requirements of the Community Development Code.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity
to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate
the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter
with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at
727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, AIC
Planning Director
S.•IPlanning DepartmentICD BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished Applications lBay Esplanade 685-689 Bay Esplanade Condos (T) -
Approved0ay Esplanade 685-689 CDB Time Extension Development Order 4.18.07.doc
FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR
JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERS EN, COUNCILMEMBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
C ITY OF C LEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING November 16, 2005
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930
Clearwater, Florida 33755
RE: Development Order - FLD2005-08088 - 685 - 689 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On November 15, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request
for Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a
reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 13 feet (to water feature), reductions to the front
(north) setback along Somerset Street from 15 feet to 12.67 feet (to building), from 15 feet to 9.83 feet
(to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 46.83 feet (to roof
deck) with an additional 4.17 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building
within the visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. The Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-
803.B;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy;
4. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a
monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and
color of the building;
5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground.
Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be
installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected
utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to
BRIAN J. ALINGST, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HoY-r HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER ACk "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the
commencement of work;
November 16, 2005 Ghovaee - Page 2
6. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from•the condominiums;
7. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
8. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
9. That all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project be brought up
to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304);
10. That all unused existing driveways/parking areas within the Bay Esplanade and Somerset rights-of-
way be removed and be sodded, acceptable to the Engineering Department;
11. That the encroaching pavement along the south property line be removed prior to the issuance of the
first Certificate of Occupancy;
12. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised to remove the Medjool date
palm from the visibility triangle at the street intersection and the shrubs and tree from the waterfront
sight visibility triangle in the southeast corner of the site; and
13. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical
and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are
attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (November 15, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained
within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with
successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a
period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community
Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development
coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on December 2, 2005 (14
days from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504.
You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.Inyclearwater.com/ og v/dgpts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
Michael De k, AI - Planning Director
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications0ay Esplanade 685-689 Bay Esplanade Condos (7) -
Approved IBay Esplanade 685-689 Development Order. doc