Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2005-07061
Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1,205.00 0 I L-3) 'L_ 0 0,.2 ?- D 7 0 (a / CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 04-05-05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Mark International LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 1015 Eldorado Ave. Clearwater FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727-447-5121 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Sunrise on the Beach Inc. (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Keith E. Zavac. P.E., RLA MAILING ADDRESS: Keith Zavac & Associates Inc 701 Enterprise Road Ste 404, Safety Harbor FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: keithCcDkeithzavac.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 229 Coronado Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: See Attachment A PARCEL SIZE: 19,800 s.f. 0.45 acres (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT:_16 condominium units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) , DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See attachment B I ! j ;1 I !:` 1 t ,.... . 11 Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested cod de i" ] eG ti i re ired numb4lo6iJa' ing spaces, specific use', 'etc.) VCS 0 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character: of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attachment C for questions 1-6 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. 4 1tr !- I? 11 it;r I" ? Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zi 8m g Dis rict t&hich the . aiver'is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: -- See attachment D ! P^. 0 0 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design C Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): KEZ Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER? PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ All dimensions; _ North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; J f Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; ???Nl• All existing and proposed points of access; N & All required sight triangles; Re ^ 1? D???LQp,IpjlyrSVCS Identification of environmentally unique areas, sucy a#ic gr?Sistd?, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of underst i aoldLand wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening fper Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: - Land area in square feet and acres; - Number of EXISTING dwelling units; - Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: - All existing and proposed structures; - Names of abutting streets; - Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 1% X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); El COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscc/ape so(Nci ted WithgthelComprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the ar aswhere minim7rlrCodewill' not be met.. N ORIGINAL ?. I ! 0- 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN 5-,jBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 44 4UZA.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. Q BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 'h X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. X Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department.at,(727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize re sentatives to visit and photograph the property d cri t p lication. Si$rbture of proi6eT`ty owner or representative PLfiNNlNG& DE'JELOPh.irN('S;'ivS STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF:PI_NEL -QF 0- Sryof? ?to? and-subscribed before me this - day of 20? to me and/or by, if s/r,cp? 14 &4r, cc who is personally known has identification. r ?- •? Notary PUDIC,' . My commission expires: ORIGINAL oBrigitte Bays _ My Commission DD083811 c. 0 , r`I Expires January 'i3,2090 • . AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Sunrise on the Beach, Inc. 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) See attachment E for list of requests 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Koah 9: 72yac, P E , RLA as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; r 6. That (Ilwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and P Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS c fore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared ., , ?? ?,? k p•,?,?? , ?1? who having been first duty swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed grlg?fle Bays ?/ `'AN Commi on Dp063811 ` Notary Public My Commission Expires: Expires January 13.2006 or n S:IPlanning Department%Application Formsldevelopment reviewVlexible development comprehensive infifl application 2005.doc ORIGINAL ti PLA ? { of 0 0 ATTACHMENT A PARCEL NUMBERS 08/29/15/17568/000/0010 ORIGINAL d f ?; l • ATTACHMENT B DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • • Increase in height from 35 ft to 53'-6" from FEMA to midpoint of roof. • Reduction in minimum lot width from 100 ft to 90 ft. • Reduction in rear setback from 10 feet to 6 feet (to sidewalk). • Termination of 22 non-conforming overnight accommodations and conversion to 16 multi-family condominium units. ORIGINAL VW J141 'r ~ I l1 0 0 ATTACHMENT C GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent properties. The proposed project will maintain a mid-rise character that provides a buffer from the Beach Walk district to Brightwater. The project does not deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District. The density of 16 condominium units does not change after a termination of non-conforming 22 motel units and conversion to multifamily. The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The coverage and bulk of the project is contained within the required building setback without the need for exterior parking spaces. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of other properties on Coronado Drive in the small motel district by maintaining a mid-rise height of 53'-6" and with no building verticle setback deviations. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by the development of 16 condominium units with a market value in excess of $500,000 per unit. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The 16 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and replaces the existing 22-unit motel development. There are no proposed uses other 'than residential that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. The redevelopment of the site will eliminate the existing on-street backout parking spaces with a fully enclosed parking garage with no parking reductions. Pedestrian access will be enhanced by a 7 foot wide sidewalk where none exists today increasing the safety aspects for pedestrians. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion The proposed redevelopment eliminates the current on-street backout parking spaces and replaces them with a fully enclosed parking garage accessed by two -Wway drives. The drives access Third Avenue rather than Coronado or rr? 141- en:. Pedestrian access will be enhanced by a 7 foot wide sidewalk. F% ORIGINAL rr STS VC. • • 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The surrounding parcels along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive are primarily older motel developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity by conforming with a Coastal flavor. The project will provide a mid-rise transition from the larger Hyatt and 100 Coronado projects, while maintaining a high grade architectural design to complement the adjacent motel projects within the Beach Walk area. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. The project minimizes the acoustic and olfactory impacts of the project by planting landscape buffers and the use of a parking garage with no exterior parking. The project only contains 16 residential units, and will not include any commercial or other businesses. ?, ORIGINAL • • ATTACHMENT D FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA FOR ATTACHED DWELLINGS A. The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity. The reduction in lot width still maintains a mid-level building that is at or lower than recently approved and existing projects within the tourist district. The project maintains all required setbacks from the property line to the building and does not include any exterior parking. The fully enclosed building provides an elegant solution to maintaining the allowable units on the site without the use of exterior parking or excess building height. B. The use of the parcel for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street. The project access is located on Third Avenue rather than Coronado or Hamden. C. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building. The minimal increase in height results in a sight plan without any exterior parking spaces or the need for building setback variance requests. The result is a fully enclosed building surrounded by landscaping. Setbacks: A. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life. There are no front setback reductions requested. B. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. There are no front setback reductions requested. C. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles. The rear setback reduction of 10 feet to 6 feet is to pavement only which will not impede access, but help facilitate access along the sidewalk to the garage. D. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. The one rear setback reduction is required to provide pedestrian access to the garage and stairwells. This access allows the parking to be fully enclosed in a parking garage without the need for exterior parking. E. Offstreet Parking: PLR,NN1N('&aEVElo}. i arcs ORIGINAL • • The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation. The likely uses of the property will be characterized by retirement age seasonal residents without school age children who will likely maintain one vehicle per unit. Due to the proximity of; the project to restaurants, shops and other services establishments; a significant amount of trips are anticipated by foot rather than vehicle. The remainder of the parking spaces would be available for visitors. • Offstreet parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level fagade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. The parking within the footprint of the building is fully enclosed and integrated into the architecture of the building. The entrance and exit to the garage is limited to two one way driveways which are separated by the pool deck. Color and texture of the fagade are the same as other portions of the building facade based on the color chips submitted. F. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5. The design of the building complies with the Tourist District guidelines as demonstrated in attachments. ORIGINAL ORIGINAL I t M 01 x.c. RAMP 14vNa H M .?.n mwMN. u a x..veH.m. ` I Y ' I,I 1 Y" iT HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL FF- - ??--J _ HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL LEGEND (TYP.) _C. ?.. ?.. ?..? PROECT BOUNDARY EM9RNG TREE TO BE NONOVEO .F.. ....vr PRWOSID CONUtfR PAANWG GENERAL NOTES: 1. ENONEER/LANOSCAPE ARCHITE CT: HEITN ZAYAC 6: ASSOCIATES, INC. ]01 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404 SAFETY HARBOR, FL 31695 ]2]) ]93-9888 BVA ]2]) ]9J-9855 FO: 2. SITE ADDRESS: 229 CORONADO ORIVE CLEAR AMR. FL 33]6] PARCEL 10: 08/29/15/17568/000/0010 ZONING: 'Y 3. PRESENT USE 24 OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS 4. DEVELOPED USE 16 MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNITS S TOTAL SITE AREA 19.800.00 SF (0.45 AC) e. SETBACKS: ffigu D E9PE9SED 10-IW MONT 15.00' NIN. 5011TH TO BLDG.) I W' NIN. sourH To oNERHANC> 15.00' NIN. (EAST TO SLOG.) 13.GO' MIN. (EAST TO OVERHANG) 15.00' NIN. (NEST TO BLDG.) 13.00' NIN. (NEST TO OVERHANG) o-10' REAR 10.00 MIN. (NORTH TO BLDG.) 6.00' MIN. (NORTH TO SIDEWAU() ]. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 35'-100' FT PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT 55'-0' FROM FEMA UNE TO MID-PANT OF ROOF 9. SOLD WASTE WMPSTER WILL BE LOCATED IN BUILDING 9. LIGHTING WTHIN PROJECT BOUNOARIES WILL BE ATTACHED TO BUILDING AND WLL BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF FINAL BUILDING PLANS. t0. EXtSTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS = 9.010.32 SF = 0.20 AC. 11. ALL DISTURBED CRASS WTHIN RIGHT-CF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED. 12. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB SIDEWAU9. MD LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS 13. FLOW ZONE: MIS PROPERTY UES WTHIN FLOW ZONE 'AE' AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOW INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 12103CD102C (ELEV 11) DATE.. SEPTEMBER 3. 2003 14. ALL EYMSTING SIGNAGE WILL BE REMOVED AND PROPOSED SIGNAGE WILL BE ATTACHED TO BLDG. FACADE AND ADHERE TO CODE. I5. THERE ARE UTILITY EASEMENTS IDENTRED BY THE SURVEY ON THIS PROPERTY. 16. THERE ARE NO ENMROMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE. 17. A $200 RECREATION FAULTY IMPACT FEE IS WE FOR EACH NEW UNIT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS OR 'NAIL PLAT (IF APPUCA9LE) WOCH EVER OCCURS FAST. CONTACT ART NAOER AT ]2].562.4824. 18. DUN STER SERWCE SHALL BE ARRANGED WITH SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL UCENSE OR CERTIDCATE OF OCCUPANCY. PLEASE CONTACT TOM GLENN AT ]2].562.4930 19. SIIE DATA TABLE EMSTIN6: BFan9r0 A 10 AL STE AREA I%$o .00 ST (0.45 AC) 19.80000 3 (043 AC) 10.00000 SF B. MIA, OPEN SPACE: 1.669.91 3 (615 AC) 7.31004 SF (0.16 AC) 990 S (D02 AC INN.) C. 83RDWG FOOTPRINT: 6.93239 y (O.JS ISR) I1.21A39 3 (056 FAR) - E. SIK.ALN/DE./PAVFG AREA: 6.26SOO 3 1.2)0.5) SF F. TOTAL IMPFRMOUS AREA: 13.197.39 SF (at 17) 12489.96 SF (063 ISP) IB.BION SF (095 ISM Mu G PARWtto SPACES: N/A 24 SPACES 24 (1.5 SIAOFSAWI) H. VEHOILAR AREA N/A .166.32 SF - I. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA: N/A N/A N/A M 04EANIGNT ACCOMMODATIONS. 22 UNITS G UNITS N/A (`VMM01A6 WONLrsm01 . A. WL9TAMLY 6D1001INpM WIS: 0 UNITS I6 UNITS ISSUED F0diP?QAING ONL1 z '`I F v? fl ? ?t F U z W n W G W 6 Z O W 0 F ?U C W Of 6 NN W CN U A a Q c a 0 E- G F U 3 rn 4 J Y W H 3U I ?3 oP 5 ISSUE DATE: 08.15 GRAPHIC SCALE t Im6 Qa to .?owawn ?? .p ?` `?A vw.r wr.a <a.cl >.xc wa w mn it?b 't? awn PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECnON) PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. I. GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES I. ?pn4«W .wu prwa dwa9 adN w r.w'x.e. b pw.i0. wwtia aranw..w pmmo4 apernum ` °n0 °f pO w ? ? t p wr in Z yoaa µ,ra.y a wtl.we w ew nm a x. 1 -1 mE?CanmolaMa w0 r Pr;ian W Rao Mau<M ?6aaw aw ZbneoNa Iw w.a? ' Rwb aaVOrtmvit a "r ° r ? ?f` ? B . l . w.law rmm ?n: eaan. e?: m pm: J x. en wnww droll a eon. u owmaw..im u. Ianea rw.a,ym.n: ana cw.:. nx<aevm. w- araw<x. .. w?pl. mm a rrmx<w .Im pnrarm zo-la-s roam ea «. a. ma,rr«w..a x.errema In «nFm<uen :u l ?. ? s !. m. wnarN .ai o w app t?p ? • a. Id °: !03 tonal ng pl b m m elwn v : Ym aeiwW oM wW-nddn9 mW<1H. wp tl?°WI aW?l?d otl?.rww?w raaly 'f ? a ? .u w rwl , a a. a. u ? '? NI do"ap a.«..wl .«.iw a r brw ar Mvm mdm. rNw i. m a wu?w ? .nm inualava,. at s r. Ina w. t wa w+wdu u w lw.wow panao<t>. h m..wn of o emapanay d ` w : ? 1 ? ? p u al aw u danl :M. ,. dw mail ? ' ? a. _ «e.+?? .p«mwtiw. .ur atwol noe m« my w«Inwuw. man ea ..move aw • • > a I cw ?mr ww ?r. px ? ?.aam?ano r,.H nau ua .u we u. oa a«w;«u. awrwp.<iw v. eow 1- ?j ? ?I ? ?wlr xnrpor mtpna; <.p. rax'ISt? a:.w..r. a wan Ip. raiw b rwwt ? i W `« i`" i m ? t .aa w, w «. u. pan ar u. awxow anw W a uw Um a np. eb . 1 V 1 10. u M wowwav b n.pwvbl. rw xwai w n.c..nry pppaaw pvmlb .im nc.nx. b pWam . m plon K aw pw . .a;rmtu? (J p Z ? I I. t maWa .p.dnw udm uww.aw. at .nkn t+ne m. ana«aw ir/<NINt mini a weMe w ?°.nn^9°or Inunae Wngx. r _ [? m 5"pam• w«rma,q m. w? an a,m/d wwalwap..nav a. awaw b u. I?a.<aw a.<w«. I:. ei m>i > a m 9 ? G Is. tan moll a w paiY« aaww. o- wmubran .imart to .nuw ppo-owi d lw owr. m O Ip. .aWN, wnt .w.rwsaH W o ww of w (Ix) mwu. Iroma wx awanw. m M ua anw a a . <N1.p<• S o O Is. bne.capv Conp«ea prW b lane.caps malwa Inmoalbn. 6cr.wwb. ww E" It It Is. w nH w°h w cy w?i.? ?wwa .an?°`ww.w! u°I`lewibnTem`na`ab a t ? I acax c?°ona«io°0m Im'aaw°adaw?i wn. ? V 3 a IT. MI pmmb n.c...pry pro b b provbw w m. habanq wnVacta unlw. oewrww --Y ma.e ;n w .p«tlwlbn fW/ q 4] le. a wnlm<m. ;e..W WUOn Wn. wall a puMHaa a, u. mj- .WI I« W mi t w>marcon .19n.. (? lV •Ux Iv. ea d;, .w WII a run.v.a a. n«.npry t° ..c.mwelr n.r pl.nmq.. f?/ 1 xo. My ..wN axo. ua aw dup,ew apnnv u. ba.wp. hmawv.n m a w.me.e a;u s..pwwx ryra<mm xl. TM lanax.w Cwt.- -HI a n.wnbnb br u° wh.- -l, and ww.r di.-I d any as .e aM. [^ p.n.mtw d." m. .-I- al a. yqw. i r xx. x axa. anb,ew .nnin npnl d .w .null a .om.e. a[ L p rvag n .?mr°i x+rn aw m ? IMr®?pxi ww O wru gq R Y?ia ?a u'm?N TREE PLANING DETAIL n.rs. GRAPHIC SCALE p l bNp >b) IL 0 z o O a IRRIGATION NOTES a 0?, I. wwm. Imgp<Iw mum. Net pe bx IaOF <.v.mp. b .II a.poa.d Q rA ¢ a c awux., .in a awNnw am muaNa .r w CaM<W. U < m x. apww IMwtian swbm mp.l mwl w ..awe ml ` cin wa. Nor . I . ?... Ip. pwwna? .aWna vom 'mr .i 0: z x. Iwgpaon mewl na,u a h.w<ua wp .«wlw a lwaw.w .nNlwt a tlmwan o.-a,N ammNa..nl<n a,mlay one awM lanoh p m.anwuo-n :y ? /a xanmp«,, road a .Amlu a aaw m rl,a I.,pwm. awwm.x. t y d s w wwmwl we wow .awH rw uw i fr in;paan <wlml lim.r riu u. aa.al cwu,a« .mp imlpauw •ruo-n <o-wo-wnb .u a Ka •. «nun. su wan;da• w oawe> wnva r vmt« - la voaw va?eo..? PLANT LIST .II-I.wnl<,m, e.w.mw.,pmux i u..I,v Hr.l I. a Na.wlwb..iab H..man,s-.:x.soa ry.nlr. v.nxbe am.w„m x ou. a Hr.l xr o.c. IIM w wneq alw ew rw,xwe; I.a ae. a H Heaw. vox vn.nu.,HOwp.,xa.e.;aHr.xxsae. 5 OF 5 ISSUE DATE: 08.15.06 0 • KEY PLAN -Q --------------------- KP Clearwater SUNRISE CONDOMINIUMS Clearwater Beach, Florida a9rWftreserved, WuoAndAocturelDesign, k 314S. MRSOURIAVE. SUITE311, CLEARWATER,FLORIDA 33768 727A61b424rel 727.488.6080 fax 0 0 TO-) drWftre$SrK MWDAidWoOWreWD4s0,b 8148.MtSSOURUWE.SW7E311, CLEARWATMRDRIDA 33750 7NAOIX424tA 727.4ES.BMbt S1 1"I -? 0 0 sHrVftreserved, WtroAr&ftecWrfIDeefgn,lb 3143.M MURIAVE.SUTTE311, CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33756 727.461.6424tel 727.466.6660 ten a 0 0 5??; sc ORIGINAL 0 0 METRO ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN July 12, 2005 City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, Florida RE: Sunrise Condominium Project Dear Wayne Wells: • PLANNING ARCHITECTURE INTERIORS 314 S. MISSOURI AVE 727.461 .5424 T SUITE #311 CLEARWATER, FL 727.461.4787 F 33756 The proposed building materials are as follows: 1. Exterior facade is to be a combination of stucco and clapboard. Clapboard is currently conceived as Hardi-plank. 2. Roofing material is to be standing seam metal in soft green 3. Railings are currently planned to be glass set in aluminum frame Highest Regards, Christopher P. Miller Architect AR 91601 • Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Sunrise Condominiums Stormwater Narrative L_J 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith@keithzayac.com The stormwater system is designed to treat the first half-inch of runoff from the site, and attenuate the 25 year 1 hour storm event. The system consists of two interconnected normally dry ponds. The site runoff is directed to the ponds by underground roof drain connections. The peak discharge is attenuated by a control structure prior to discharge to the public right of way. 0% ;0 Z M ? 0? Za; 0 0 M mn ?? 2 Zn M ?? ORIGINAL v l rN ?r O> . I% -r r Q P.E. NQ,,: 9; ?0" 0 • Sunrise Condominiums Stormwater Calculations 4f-1t1i1CT 0IiUIiIN7iI3 • Description Area ft2 x C = 5 CA pavement 6,265 0.49 3,069.9 building 6,932 0.49 3,396.7 pond 0 1.00 - open area 6,603 0.20 1,320.6 CeXSt = 0.39 PROPOSED CONDITIONS: Description Area ft2 x C = pavement 1,270 0.98 1,244.6 building 11,219 0.98 10,994.6 pond 1,082 1.00 1,082.0 open area 6,228 0.20 1,245.6 C prop = 0.74 ATTENUATION VOLUME REQUIRED: Volume Required = delta C x A x I x 3600 delta C = 0.34 Area = 0.45 acres I = 3.6 in/hr 25 year 1 hour storm Volume Required = 1997.144 cubic feet n /V o z iTt n a'7 M ? - F..? M ? z ORIGINAL Staae-Storaae-Perimeter Project Name: Sunrise Condominium Project Number: - Designer. kez Date: _ 8/112Q005 Comments: (ft2) (ft) (ft) Area @ Top of Bank(TOB): 2,342.4 Elevation: 4.80 Volume: 2,868 Area @ Design High Water(DHW): 1,967.9 Elevation: 4.35 Volume: 1,898 Area @ Design Low Water(DLW): 1,468.7 Elevation: 3.75 Volume: 867 Area @ Bottom/Normal Water Level(BOT/NWL): 80.6 Elevation: 3.00 Volume: 0 STAGE AREA VOLUME STAGE AREA VOLUME TREATMENT (ft) (ft) (ft3) (ft) (ft) (ft) VOLUME: 867 ft3 3.00 844.6 0.0 3.90 1,593.5 1,097.1 3.04 874.5 30.9 3.94 1,623.4 1,155.0 ATTENUATION 3.07 904.5 63.0 3.97 1,653.4 1,214.0 VOLUME: 1,031 ft3 3.11 934.4 96.1 4.01 1,683.4 1,274.1 3.14 964.4 130.2 4.04 1,713.3 1,335.2 3.18 994.4 165.5 4.08 1,743.3 1,397.4 3.22 1,024.3 201.8 4.12 1,773.2 1,460.7 3.25 1,054.3 239.3 4.15 1,803.2 1,525.1 3.29 1,084.2 277.7 4.19 1,833.1 1,590.6 3.32 1,114.2 317.3 4.22 1,863.1 1,657.1 3.36 1,144.1 358.0 4.26 1,893.1 1,724.7 3.40 1,174.1 399.7 4.30 1,923.0 1,793.4 3.43 1,204.0 442.5 4.33 1,953.0 1,863.2 3.47 1,234.0 486.4 4.37 1,982.9 1,934.0 3.50 1,264.0 531.4 4.40 2,012.9 2,005.9 3.54 1,293.9 577.4 4.44 2,042.8 2,078.9 3.58 1,323.9 624.5 4.48 2,072.8 2,153.0 3.61 1,353.8 672.7 4.51 2,102.7 2,228.2 3.65 1,383.8 722.0 4.55 2,132.7 2,304.4 3.68 1,413.7 772.3 4.58 2,162.7 2,381.7 3.72 1,443.7 7 823.8 4.62 2,192.6 2,460.1 d311 M V310 3o 1?1?? 3. 6 1,473.7 876.3 4.66 2,222.6 2,539.6 MWISW30 E)NINWc 3.79 1,503.6 929.9 4.69 2,252.5 2,620.1 1-0 3.83 1,533.6 984.6 4.73 2,282.5 2,701.8 - 3.86 1,563.5 1,040.3 4.76 2,312.4 2,784.5 G J SQQZ 1 4.80 2,342.4 2,868.3 j? • 0 Sheet2 Weir Calculation Q=3WH^1.5 CFS Q post 1.2 Q pre 0.63 Q dis 0.57 ft H 0.6 rim elevation - weir elevation W=Q/3H^1.5 ft_ in W= 0.408815 4.905779 Weir width = 4.905779 inches wide 0? ::? z M nz t 7 of N h B L., . O v .? M X1"1 Page 1 • • FLD2005-07061 229 CORONADO DR Date Received: 07/01/2005 SUNRISE ON THE BEACH INC ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 276A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW CLW CoverSheet S4At°? 7/1/2005 ?'I' Receipt #: 1200500000000006158 10:58:56AM r Date: 07/01/2005 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2005-07061 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check K AND P CLEARWATER ESTATE R_D 10066 In Person 1,205.00 LLC Payment Total: $1,205.00 JUL 01 2005 l PLANNING CtEv-1 Jr r1( j'J4. CITY Or THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt FLD2005-07061 229 CORONADO DR Date Received: 07/01/2005 SUNRISE ON THE BEACH INC ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 276A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet • ' Z4T Fk, "'#'092 LONG R?.NGa PLANNING D1iVE.LOP1NIIiN'I' RHVIEW f CITY OF CLEA R W A T E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr OI'1'lCr•. Box 4748, CLEARW'ATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICBs BUILDING, 1.00 SOU-1'1-1 MYR"fl.e AVENUE-, CLEARW'ATFR, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 January 17, 2007 Mr. Kirit Shah PO Box 3094 Clearwater, FL 33767 RE: FLD2005-07061 - 229 Coronado Drive Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Shah: On January 16, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 229 Coronado Drive shall be submitted by March 20, 2008. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, Al Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished Applications I Coronado 0229 Sunrise Condos (7) - ApprovedlCororado 229 CDB Time Extension Development Order 1.17.07.doc I'RAiAh I h I i I i Rl), IMAYOR IOII;\: Dc(:cnII"MIsra: (Icn,r I-L. NIICr( )", (:,)I "t:I L>IJ:?I IiItlt BILL.10.."ON, Ccn,ncai. li•: nsrac C:ARLEN A. PPITESEN, Ccri NCILMEMBFN 'T"01JAI. I:,NtPLOYNIHN r AN(> Ar•i:ii,, lArlvi; AcrJON 1?: mlc )1 FIR" 14 A? -1 0 0 Clearwater U Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: Kirit Shah DATE: January 11, 2007 FAX: 727-461-3670 TELEPHONE: 727-442-4842 FROM: Wayne M. Wells TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4504 SUBJECT: Time Extensions for FLD2005-07061 - 229 Coronado Drive and FLD2004-02013A - 100 Coronado Drive and 201, 215 and 219 S. Gulfview Boulevard MESSAGE: Attached are the Memorandii regarding the Time Extension requests being sent to the Community Development Board to be heard at 1:00 pm on Tuesday, January 16, 2007. The meeting will be held in Council Chambers in City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue. NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 3 it tL ? ?a,o?s???y?.i??.?? 1 • • Jan. 11 2007 06:13PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94613670 Jan.11 06:10PM 02'39 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF 13Y USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-000-H3-P-FAX C435-7329). 0 0 K & P Clearwater Estate II, LLC PO Box 3094 Clearwater, Florida 33767 Phone (727) 442-4842, Fax: (727) 461-3670 December 22, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-07061 - 229 Coronado Dr. Time extension for Development Order Dear Mr. Delk, ORIGINAL RECENED ..-C292w PLANNING DEPARJMENt CITY OF CLEARWATER On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above referenced application. On August 22, 2006, we submitted and extension request to apply for building permits. Based on some code amendments, you approved a six month extension to the development order per Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code. This extension is to expire on March 20, 2007. This is a request for the CDB to consider an additional one year extension to the development order. Our request is based on the following facts: 1- The entire year of 2006 has seen the two roads under reconstruction at the property. Beach Walk has caused all of Coronado Dr. and Third St. to be totally redone as part of phase I of the project. This has made it impossible to attempt to market any sales effort in a successful manner. 2- The condominium market has suffered a significant downturn which now appears to be slightly improving. We believe that with the completion of Phase I of Beach Walk, the probability of marketing and closing on sales of these residential units can be completed and construction begun in a timely manner. We look forward to appearing before the CDB and responding to their questions and comments. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-442-4842. Sincerel&1ah President/CEO K& P Clearwater Estate 11, LLC 101 S. Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33767 ::' CITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT --by Ut+ti Posr Orrua Box 4748, Ci.enriwnrek Froriir)n 33758-47 f8 MUNICIPAL SNRVICES 13ulrofNc, 100 SOUTH MYRTu: AwN(T, CLPAimA•rl?R, RoRIDA 33756 TELE11110NE, (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG. RANGP. PIANNING August 31, 2006 DEVELOPMENT Rrvii., w Mr. Kirii Shah, President/CEO K&P Clearwater Estate II, LLC 643 Harbor Island Clearwater, Florida 33767 RE: FLD2005-07061 - 229 Coronado Drive Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Shah: On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for (1) Tennination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 90 feet along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 53.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (September 20, 2006). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On August 22, 2006, you submitted a request for a six-month time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited problems of delays due to market conditions being soft, changing architectural firms to complete construction drawings and slow pre-sales due to Beach Walk construction. Since the approval of this project, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: 1. The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per unit. This project was approved with 24 parking spaces for 16 attached dwelling units, at a parking ratio of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. 1:k ,UK I111MAru, N1 MM ?u,i ih>rnn, 04 N,.ii. IFMl".N I IM I I I:\\111:1(,\'• O)l'\( 1011:WWR (;nix,n (:\ri.i:N A. Pl:I sr , Cni • August 31, 2006 Shah - Page Two is Section 6-109.13 was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. In considering the above changes to the Code, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension to March 20, 2007, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 229 Coronado Drive. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, M Michael el , AICP Planning Director S: I Plaiming DeportmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicalionACoronado 0229 Sunrise Condos (7) - ApprovedlCoronado 229 Time Ext. Dev. Order 8.31.06.doc r-- f • K&P Clearwater Estate II, LLC August 21, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 RE: Development Order-Case No. FLD2005-07061-229 Coronado Drive (Sunrise Resort) Dear Mr. Delk, This letter would constitute our request for an extension of six months in the above reference to the Development Order. Our request is based on the following criteria. a) Market conditions on Clearwater Beach are exceptionally soft. We believe this market will rebound in the short term. b) We are changing to an architectural firm that has the production capability as our previous architect cannot timely complete the drawings. c) Part of our problem has been the construction of Beachwalk Phase I, which has made pre-sales to be impossible. If you have any questions do not hesitate to call Kirit Shah, K&P Clearwater Estate II, LLC's managing member, at 727-455-6250. Sincerely, VtShah President/CEO Enclosure _- G OP Y ' ;?'t 'D, a• '1-1w-e-01 ql_j??IAOVII .11 r=CE? r= DR AUG 2 2 2006 10 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Mailing Address: 643 Harbor Island, Clearwater FL 33767 Location Address: 229 Coronado Avenue, Clearwater FL 33767 Office Phone: 727-447-0359 Cell: 727-455-6250 Fax:727446-2370 a 68/17/2006 15:53 7277239 L ZAYAC • PAGE 82 4th *"S CITY OF CLEARWATER PUNNWG DUMTMEIV'1' Posr Owice Plox 4748, Cmwmn, Fwma 33758.4748 Mu1NIOpAr. St Rums Bumm,100 Sours Mm u Aye aw, CLwwAyea, FLORIDA 33756 UwG RAwA ftwNm 'I1tlseHom (727) $62-4567 FAx (727) 5624576 Drff oln "T Rrvmw September 30, 2005 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-07061- 229 Coronado Drive Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 90 feet along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, a reduction to the front (south,) setback from 15 feet to zero fed (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 53.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility tringles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.8. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Babes for Avprovaf: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2- 803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of ppMXIL: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2: That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Managentelt Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowDer's documents, deed restrictions or like fortes, shalt be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; BWN ). Amicsr, MAYoR-Commmst )mm How HAteutm, Via MAYox-CommusioNim W{;n W GRAY, COM.Nl9 AONf.R FRANK Hawn o, CoIND11ti5RTNER 4D &4a JONSON. CoNMONONF:R "EQUA1. EMri-mmrm ANu A,mnwTm, ACTION EMPj=r.W' - '`948 /17/2006 15:53 727723997-7 ZAYAC PAGE 03 ? 11V September 30, 2005 Zayae - Page 2 4. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting tight-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frODtages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work 6. Thlat a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; and 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4.407, an applicr ion for a buildh* permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Timc frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be requited. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4502.8 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notioe of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner 11I, at 727-562-4504. You can access Xmike. inforgption for parcels within the City through our website: www.rmrclearwater_com/gpv/ ?. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael Dells, AICP Planning Director S. 'Manning Depart wlIC D 81FaX (F4A)Unocrive or Finished AApUeorionsl Coronado 0229 Sunrise Condos (7) - Approved iCoronado 229 Devdwmem Onder.dee rNt • ??4YY1' LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 0-- C I'TY OF C LEARWA°TE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567. FAX (727) 562-4576 September 30, 2005 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-07061 - 229 Coronado Drive Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109; • and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 90 feet along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 53.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2- 803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOPI' HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® Bll.l. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE. ACTION EMPLOYER" • September 30, 2005 Zayac - Page 2 is 4. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 6. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; and 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S.Wlanning DeparunentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationslCoronado 0229 Sunrise Condos (T) - Appro vedl Coronado 229 Development Order.doc 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 4:06 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Hunraf@aol.com; ehooper1 @aol.com; kirits007@yahoo.com Subject: Fw: Staff Reports for September 20 CDB Coronado 229 Staff Report.doc We concur with conditions of approval. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <keith@keithzayac.com> Cc: <amber@keithzayac.com> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 3:38 PM Subject: Staff Reports for September 20 CDB Keith - Attached is the Staff Report for FLD2005-07061, 229 Coronado Drive, for the September 20, 2005, CDB meeting at 10:00 am. Wayne Coronado 229 Staff Report.doc>> 1 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 3:39 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: 'amber@keithzayac.com' Subject: Staff Reports for September 20 CDB Keith - Attached is the Staff Report for FLD2005-07061, 229 Coronado Drive, for the September 20, 2005, CDB meeting at 10:00 am. Wayne 1 Coronado 229 Staff Report.doc 'T -l"Ji Pi-1!\[ N11.T4G f FPARTIV E1\T POST OFFICE Box 4745, CLEARWATER, Fr.ORIDA 33755-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, '100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE pI.A:\TNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 24, 2005 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-07061) Dear Mr. Zayac: The Case No. FLD2005-07061 for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6- 109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 90 feet along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 53.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B, for property located at 229 Coronado Drive, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on September 20, 2005. The meeting will take place at 10:00 a.m. (note time of meeting) in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III S.1Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Wending casesWp for the next CDBICoronado 229 Sunrise Condos (T) - 9.20.05 CDB - WWICoronado 229 CDB Letter.doc FRAN:< HII3BARD, MAYOR BiujoNsoN, VICF.-MAYOR IOHN DORAN• COUNCILME.NIBF..R Hoer HAbllCFON, COUNC1Lti1En1BER CARU'N A. Pr.TERSEN, COUNCIIAM-NIBER "FQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER' RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS FOR 229 CORONADO D General Engineering: U 1. Beachwalk plan specifies a 7-foot sidewalk to be constructed along Coronado Drive; revise plans accordingly. ,%Rr ! The sidewalk has been revised to 7 foot in width. PLRNI, SVCS 2. Applicant and applicant's contractor shall coordinate construction activities, particularly uti ' sidewalk and driveway construction, with the city's Beachwalk contractor. Acknowledged. O.RIGINAL Fire: 1. This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged 2. This building is to be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge with intent of comply prior to CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. 3. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge with intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. 4. Fire Department Connections shall be indentified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. Landscaping: 1. Sheet 515 - Indicate the number of plants in each location of Pittosporum (correct spelling in Plant List), as has been done for all other plants/trees. The quantity and spelling have been corrected. 2. Sheet 515 - Coordinate proposed landscape materials with the location of retention ponds on both the east and west sides of the building (Pittosporum, hibuscus and liriope indicated to be planted on the slopes and bottom of the retention ponds). Revise. The landscaping has been removed from areas within the stormwater pond. 3. Sheet 515 - Any changes to the landscape plan must also be approved by the City (not just the Landscape Architect). Acknowledged Stormwater: Required Volume of pond must follow City of Clearwater Stormwater Design Criteria where Vol = delta C x A x i x 3600; where i is intensity of 25-year, I-hour storm (3.6 in/hr). Additionally, the existing impervious area is limited to a 50% credit in the predevelopment C 0 0 calculations (use a value of .49 rather than .98). The stormwater calculations incorporated half of the existing impervious area with a .98 C value1 however the calculations have been revised as requested. 2. Please review the predevelopment C calculation for area of Open Space. Viewing the existing survey, it appears that there is significantly less existing area than reported in the Jr? I calculations. The revised calculations are coordinated with the site impervious area notes. Solid Waste: I . Show where recycling carts will be placed for residents. The recycling carts will be placed in the trash room as shown on the plans. Traffic Engineering: 1. Provide City standard H/C parking spaces. Missing 5'x 19' h/c aisle. 5' x 19' aisles have been added to garage. 2. Columns must not encroach inside parking space dimensions. Columns must be protected from vehicle bumpers, use wheel stops. Wheel stops have been added to all the garage parking spaces which will eliminate the conflict between the columns and parking spaces. 3. Remove concrete sidewalk from Hamden Drive to the site. Walk has been relocated to door. 4. Driveway curb radius and width must meet Fire Department's approval. Due to the small size of the project, the fire and emergency vehicles will stage from the three adjacent rights of way and will not need to access the site as discussed at DRC. 5. Vertical height clearance for parking garage must be a minimum of 8' 2" to accommodate h/c van per Florida Building Code Chapter 11. It is acknowledged that the garage will be a minimum of 8'-2". 6. Show dimensions of driveways, drive aisles and parking spaces. Dimensions have been added to driveways, drive aisles and parking spaces. Planning: -- 1. Since the request now has been revised to include a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for , density, need to address in writing the requirements of Section 6-109.C: Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(D). RAJII -L- Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use l t d th l t h ll b i d - oca e on e o a e term s nate , removed or brought into conformity with this development code. a- ' The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 0 0 Attachments have been revised to include Section 6-109.C. 2_ Sidewalks have been shown on the east and west sides of the building near the north side of the building; however, the sidewalks are not located where the architectural plans indicate the doors from the stairs to be (see Sheet A-4). Revise/coordinate Sheets 315, 4/5 and 515. Building Code will require a sidewalk from each of the stairwells to the public sidewalk within the rights-of-way, and pedestrians cannot exit into the parking garage. Show the location of the required sidewalks on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 & 515. Sidewalks have been revised to the north side of the building to service the proposed doors. 3. Indicate/show on Sheets 3/5 and A-4 the location of trash rooms (ground floor and upper floors). Show the location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equi ment and all re uired screenin { er Secti 3 201 D i d I d #701 p q p g on - ( )( ) an n ex } The solid waste containers will be in the identified trash/recycling room, and the mechanical equipment will be located on the roof, and screened by a parapet. ,,,r... 4. Prior comment was to have the height DIMENSIONED from BFE to the midpoint of the pitched roof. Revise Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 to indicate such height. ?j Indicate on the building elevations the height dimensioned from BFE to the midpoint of the pitched roof and the proposed colors and materials of the exterior of the building. The architectural plans have been revised to reflect the height dimension from BFE to midpoint of pitched roof, and color samples have been added to submittal. 5. Application submitted is a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Unclear, based on the requests, why this has been submitted, as only a Flexible Development application form for attached dwellings needs to be submitted. Revise. Address/provide SPECIFIC AND DETAILED responses to the Flexible Development criteria for "attached dwellings" of Section 2-803.11 as to HOW this proposal meets the criteria: a. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; b. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street; C. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; R b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building - d. Setbacks: 1 ? r.w .- a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; I T b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and i f appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by i - ©- ' ' emergency vehicles; •-, } : d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient ; r, parking or improved design and appearance; C. Off-street parking: ' '.?e _', a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the C property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use Z © of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating a purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off=street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. f The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 • of Article 3. • The application and criteria have been revised and detailed. 6. Revise Attachment B, Description of Requests, to that indicated above. Address all requests in the responses to the criteria. Attachment B has been revised. 7. Column locations appear to be incomplete. Some columns are indicated on Sheets 3/5, 4/5, 515 O and A-4. Show all column locations on these sheets. Column is shown within the eastern stairwell. Unclear if this meets Building Code. Advise/revise. Columns locations have been revised and added to appropriate locations. 8. Indicate on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 with a dashed line (similar to balconies) the building i ndentation in the center north of the pool (see Sheet A-4). The building indentation has been added as a dashed line near the pool deck. 9. Indicate on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 what type of fencing is proposed around the pool. The fence is a 4' high screen fence. The materials are anticipated to be PVC. 10. Two sidewalks are indicated from the elevator area to the sidewalk in the right-of-way of Third Avenue on either side of the pool. Only one is necessary. Revise. One of the sidewalks has been deleted. H. Sheet 3/5 - Dimension the width and length of parking spaces, width of driveways and the width of the drive aisle. The width and length of parking spaces, driveways and drive isles have been dimensioned. 12. Recommend providing two parking spaces per unit. The project is designed with 24 spaces per code due to spatial constraints and landscape requirements. 13. Any proposed storage units on the ground floor? If so, show location and design/layout. There is no storage proposed on the ground floor. 14. Indicate on Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 the distance the cantilevered balconies and overhangs extend from the face of the building. The balcony setback of 13 ft has been added to sheet 3 of 5. 15. Indicate on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 515 the balcony extension on the north side of the eastern portion j of the building (see Sheet A-4). L The balcony extensions have been added to the civil plans. 16. Sheet A-4 - Indicate the location of all windows and door on the exterior of the building on the I'J cal "typical floor plan" (see Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3). The windows and door has been added to the architectural plans. ?r n 17. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: truer That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits. Acknowledged. ?C Z? aJ a 0 0 18. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering D o epartment prior to the commencement of work; Acknowledged 19. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; Acknowledged r- 20. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Acknowledged 21. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Acknowledged 22. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Acknowledged 23. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Acknowledged 24. Response to comments dated 7/11/05 indicates the a/c units will be on the roof, however, based on the elevations, the roof is a pitched roof. Unclear where a/c units will be placed on the pitched roof. Advise/revise. The mechanical equipment will be located on the roof and screened by the surrounding pitch",gAioofs. , 25. A letter has been submitted from Metro Architectural Design indicating the exterior facade materials, including the roof and railing material and color. Prior comment was to have these --- indicated on the elevations. Also provide the proposed color of the exterior facade material (not L indicated in the letter - color renderings indicate more than one building color). Railings - clear glass or a colored glass? Railing frame - natural aluminum color, bronzed or a color frame? +?IL P ''- Revise Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 to indicate such exterior materials and colors. c, s Color chips have been added to the submittal, and the colors have been added to the reductions r r t u. included. L---( 26. Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 - Provide the height from BFE to the top of the highest roof ridge and to the top of the elevator tower. a • 27. Application indicates 24 existing overnight accommodation units/rooms, however, under Occupational License OCL9007471, there are only 22 overnight accommodation units/rooms. With the conversion calculation, these 22 units/rooms convert to 16 dwelling units (which is the proposed number of dwelling units). Revise Sheet 3/5 and the application Attachments B and C. Note 18 has been revised as well as attachments. «+w.,? 28. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #l - 1. The proposed architectural theme of this building is Mediterranean? 2. Be more specific regarding the proposed harmony relating to density as to the area. 3. Provide specifics as to HOW this project is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the surrounding properties/projects. 29. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #2 - 1. Provide details as to HOW this project is "consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses" and "other properties on Coronado Drive." 2. Provide the value of the project/property when completed. 30. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #3 - 1. Revise the number of existing units/rooms to 22. 2. Potentially speak to the redevelopment of the site with the elimination of parking that exists within or partially within the rights-of-way that backs into the streets and the provision of public sidewalks where none exists today increasing the safety aspects for pedestrians. Attachment C has been revised. 31. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #4 - Potentially speak to the redevelopment of the site with the elimination of parking that exists within or partially within the rights-of-way that backs into the streets and essentially creates long existing driveways, whereas the proposal restricts the driveways to the two one-way driveways and the provision of public sidewalks where none exists today increasing the safety aspects for pedestrians. Attachment C has been revised. 32. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #5 - 1. The proposed architectural theme of this building is Mediterranean? 2. Not only speak to the existing character of surrounding properties, but also the emerging character including the Hyatt project to the west and the Patel project to the northwest (as well as any other recently approved projects). Attachment C has been revised. 33. Address the issue that the proposed building is within the visibility triangles at the proposed driveways and the related safety aspects, within as many responses to criteria as necessary. The driveway has been located on a cross street rather than main north-south roadway to minimize safety concerns. This is noted in criteria responses. Tni 1 l X1133 ^+«? ? U PLAW INS& pEVELOPr.IENTSVCS TYF.k;?1h'I 1 0 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 5:27 PM To: 'amber@keithzayac.com' Subject: Draft DRC comments for FLD2005-07061, 229 Coronado Drive Amber - Attached are the Draft comments for August 4, 2005, DRC meeting at 11:40 am. Wayne 1' draft 8.4.05 dre action agenda... F/ 0 CITY OF CLEORWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT earwater* - MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 3 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM July 2005 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 RE: FLD2005-07061 -- 229 CORONADO DR -- Letter of Completeness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07061. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 04, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne. Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-07061 - 229 CORONADO DR 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 6:51 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07061, 229 Coronado Drive Keith - There are two things I need for this application to be complete: 1. Narrative and drainage calculations must be signed and sealed by Professional Engineer (one copy). 2. Applicant must indicate on the application form acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. With regard to #2, ensure my original copy is also initialed. Could you have these two items taken care of by 10 am on Wednesday, July 12, 2005? Thanks. Note: There are some items that were not addressed adequately, but these are being pushed off to DRC comments. Wayne • Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning July 11, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 0 414-05 permits 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith(a-keithzayac.com RE: FLD200"7061-229 Coronado Dr. - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Wells: ORIGINAL. D YUL 12 ?M"15 Submit a narrative describing the proposed stomw ater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. A stormwater narrative has been added to the stonnwater calculations. 2. Applicant must indicate on the application form, acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): X Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. An acknowledgement has been added to application. 3. Provide on Sheet 4/5 the top of bank and toe of slope for both stormwater retention ponds. The top of bank and bottom of pond have been added to sheets 3 through 5 4. There is paved vehicular use area outside of the building. Provide in the site data table on Sheet 3/5 the square footage of the paved vehicular use area outside of the building. The vehicular area is added to the site plan notes, which is under 4,000 sf. Therefore no interior landscape calculations are provided. 5. Show the location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201 (D) (i) and Index #701}; A 57(10' dumpster staging is being provided adjacent to 3'a avenue. All mechanical equipment will be located and screened on roof. 6. Building Code will require a sidewalk from each of the stairwells to the public sidewalk within the right-of--way, and pedestrians cannot exit into the parking garage. Show the location of the required sidewalks on Sheets 3/5,4/5, & 5/5. ORIGOAL • 414-05 permits Sidewalks have been added to the civil plan connecting to the public sidewalk. 7. The eastern stairwell is located in a different location on the civil site plans than on the architectural plans. Revise/coordinate. The civil and architecture plans have been revised to match each other. 8. Indicate on the building elevations the height dimensioned from BFE to the midpoint of the pitched roof and the proposed colors and materials of the exterior of the building. The building elevation have been revised to show the height from BFE to midpoint of roof. Also, the exterior color elevation are shown. 9. Provide reduced building elevations - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible). Full size and reduced building elevations are now attached to the resubmittal package. 10. The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available to residential projects. Revise Note #14 on Sheet 3/5. Address existing and proposed signage. The signage note has been revised to show the existing signage as being removed, and the proposed signage to be attached to the building and conform to code. 11. Applicant must indicate on the application form, acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. X Traffic Impact Study is not required. The application has been revised to show a study is not reuir+ed. 12. Based on the lot area of 0.454 acres and the maximum density allowable of 30 dwelling units per acre, only a maximum of 13 dwellings are permitted. The proposal is for 16 dwelling. Revise. The site data table has been revised to show the existing overnight accommodations and how the units are calculated. Attachment "B" has also been revised to request a termination of non-conforming units. Sincerely, Keith E. Zayac, P.E., R.L.A. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. M PlANNII K, 3 DEVELOPMENT SVC !'f , n MCADIAIATCO ? `Clearwater July 08, 2005 ?CITYOFCLEARWATER PARTMENT PLANNING DE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 RE: FLD2005-07061 -- 229 CORONADO DR -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07061. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. Submit a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Applicant must indicate on the application form acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. 3. Provide on Sheet 4/5 the top of bank and toe of slope for both stormwater retention ponds. ?4. There is paved vehicular use area outside of the building. Provide in the site data table on Sheet 3/5 the square footage of the paved vehicular use area outside of the building. O Show the location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; 0 Building Code will require a sidewalk from each of the stairwells to the public sidewalk within the rights-of-way, and pedestrians cannot exit into the parking garage. Show the location of / the required sidewalks on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 & 515. ?/ 7. The eastern stairwell is located in a different location on the civil site plans than on the architectural plans. Revise/coordinate. Indicate on the building elevations the height dimensioned from BFE to the midpoint of the pitched roof and the proposed colors and materials of the exterior of the building. J9. Provide reduced building elevations - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible). J 10. The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available to residential projects. Revise Note #14 on Sheet 3/5. Address existing and proposed signage. 11. Applicant must indicate on the application form acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-07061 - 229 CORONADO DR LL + CITY OF CLARWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER. COM July 08, 2005 12. Based on the lot area of 0.454 acres and the maximum density allowable of 30 dwelling units per acre, only a maximum of 13 dwellings are permitted. The proposal is for 16 dwellings. Revise. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by noon on Tuesday, July 12, 2005 (one original and 14 copies of revised application material). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. /Sincerely yours, Wayne Wells Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-07061 - 229 CORONADO DR FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: OTC FAX: 9 3 - 5 $S J Phone: 71 3 - b U6 FROM: Uqs?? Viu Phone: ? (, z - +,r(Q DATE:_ RE: H-17 Zoos - b'7-o (a 1 Z Z 9 Co r ".'" >-, MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)_ • Jul. 08 2005 06:51PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 Jul.08 06:49PM 02'04 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADJANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 6:37 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07061, 229 Coronado Drive Keith - Letter of incompleteness attached. Wayne letter of completeness 7.8.0. MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP W Planning III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005-07061 - 229 Coronado Drive DATE: December 29, 2006 Attached is information related to the request by Kirit Shah, on behalf of K & P Clearwater Estate II, LLC, for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 229 Coronado Drive. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on March 20, 2008. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted a six-month extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: 1. The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per unit. This project was approved with 24 parking spaces for 16 attached dwelling units, at a parking ratio of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. 2. Section 6-109.13 was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order August 31, 2006 Maps and Photos S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBICoronado 0229 Sunrise Condos (7) -Approved - 1. 16.07 CDB - WWICoronado 229 Time Extension Memorandum for 1.16.07 CDB.doc s • a ESPLN4 84VMONT Si ?? PAPAYA ST Z ? ?? ?cy?GE < &G "I-a° o B- I i WMD ARD P SAGE sR PROJE o ? CT 4ii sr SITE 0 aR ,84 9 6rt,?M WATER OR m Q Flh (R Sr 84YSIOE OW C s ?'r /bC7 Q BLVD 10 ss Location Map Owner. Sunrise on the Beach, Inc. Case: FLD2005-07061 Site: 229 Coronado Drive Property Size(Acres): 0.454 PIN: 08/29/15/17568/000/0010 Atlas Page: 276A 0 0 s Aerial Map Owner: ( Sunrise on the Beach, Inc. Case: FLD2005-07061 Site: 229 Coronado Drive I Property 0.454 Size(Acres): PIN: Atlas Page: 08/29/15/17568/000/0010 1 276A • ar?r7Q ?tY rbph __ I--J --1 Y Y 100 - I_L191 _- --_1 10 1 r, I , 1 1 r-__+ 1 -?-?101_? L ' I 1 100 88 P 105 i ?- j 90 i -- _ - t I +I rl+.\\\ yl -- 1 1 ! 1V If 201 1 ` _ i I - -J j !fg"tom tI_ti y? \ r///? L 2 4 \\? 1 r J t OS A _ 1 1 ? 1 1 I 1 213 ?15 _t .217 218 219 --__ Yr_ f 11 I'221 1 1 1 0 w 1 1\ -- 1 Llp `- ' L-__ 1229 tea / A ./ v )Ix -l__- 230 1 f 230 ? A / / ? r - 1301 I `-- L__ 251 301 tl 300i r ! 305 i , 3091 , ? 1.$79-z~! IJ_ L__ 1 31? ?j 312 ` - 1 1 1 ?, _I _ 311 l---i 316 1915-+_?I 1J_J P / 1317 311}'---1 i I - r `- 3 k i 1 1 r 132 1 116 j 1 13 L 1'-? B ..+ r 3 25 i 325 l 1 I r , 1 Zoning Map Owner. Sunrise on the Beach, Inc. Case: FLD2005-07061 Site: 229 Coronado Drive Property e 0 454 s): . PIN: 08/29/15/17568/000/0010 Atlas Page: 276A • • -k tt;z I "I -- --_, 101 too ? ;- fight r commodati acgo modations FIRST ST fos so d r Q lin s m ' 1 ! • 1201 1 1 1 -----a r \ r Q 1 erin-i'ght s mgs 4collpmodatio s I --? ---1 213 - ? ?15 _I 217 1 ? 218 218 - P v ? ! _ j ! mi - 21 _L I 0 ` % l J 1 I ----- , I 1 1 E Q: " ' ' ------ , 220 p et ch dv? 230 ?-'? v?" ? a Igconu? ation THIRD ST. 301 ?`- 34D 251 301 c, 3001 nt-__" 11305 1 L-- ?ve ight ail satgs 312 o - 1 s cc 311 r---1 315 ft--l I-- , / 3151'---.1 1 I c?" 1 l? 1B 1 -? I f 1 1 3 I 1 ur nib rSlllt ??i 1 __AZ6 3 ? J cftmmoNatio s -"° dld?tio s Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. I Sunrise on the Beach, Inc. I Case: FLD2005-07061 Site: 229 Coronado Drive Property 454 0 Size(Acres): . PIN: 08/29/15/17568/000/0010 Atlas Page: 276A • View looking northeast along east side of Coronado Drive north of subject property n. , 4 k+ r View looking southeast along east side of Coronado Drive south of subject property View looking southeast at detached dwelling at 225 Hamden Drive northeast of subject property 229 Coronado Drive FLD2005-07061 a View looking southwest at motel at southwest comer of intersection of 3rd Street and Hamden Dr. Page 2 of 2 View looking northwest along west side of Hamden • • View looking northeast at subject property from intersection of 3rd Street and Coronado Drive -1 f View looking northwest at Hyatt site across Coronado Drive with Patel project to the north t D; View looking northwest at subject property from intersection of 31 Street and Hamden Drive !i 1 View looking southwest at Hyatt site across Coronado Drive with retail to the south 229 Coronado Drive Page 1 of 2 FLD2005-07061 • 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 4:44 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Needed Information I do not have the accurate acreage for the Red Roof Inn property, but utilizing the Property Appraiser information and subtracting from the overall property the Travelodge and retail sales properties, it appears the Red Roof Inn property is approximately 0.755 acre in size. The Staff Report indicated that there is 73 rooms at the Red Roof Inn. Based on these numbers, the approximate existing density as a hotel is 96+ rooms/units per acre. -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:42 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Needed Information Thanks Wayne - do you know the density for just the Red Roof Inn? -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 1:12 PM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Thompson, Neil; Schodtler, John Subject: Needed Information 1. 401-421 South Gulfview Boulevard (Siena Sands; fka Travelodge and Red Roof Inn) - This was approved by the CDB under FLD2005-07068 on September 20, 2005. There was a total of 127 overnight accommodation units existing on two of the parcels (Travelodge: 54 rooms/units; Red Roof Inn: 73 rooms/units), which was converted to 95 dwelling units. A third parcel was developed commercially and yielded five additional dwelling units. A total of 100 dwelling units was approved under this proposal. The total land area is 1.994 acres, which with the 100 dwelling units approved, produces an approved density of 50.15 dwelling units/acre. 2. 229 Coronado Drive (Sunrise) - This was approved by the CDB under FLD2005-07061 on September 20, 2005. There was 22 overnight accommodation units existing, which was converted to 16 dwelling units. The land area was 0.454 acres, which with the 16 dwelling units approved, produces an approved density of 35.24 dwelling units per acre. -----Original Message----- From: Schodtler, John Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 11:41 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Needed Information Wayne, can you help Gina out here. I know there was a tricky termination of non-conforming density here. 1. How many hotel units exist 2. and are permitted. 3. How many residential du's exist 4. and are permitted. John S. -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 11:23 AM To: Schodtler, John Cc: Thompson, Neil Subject: Needed Information Hey John - could you help me get some information requested by a Councilman? Would you provide me with the density of the Red Roof Inn on the Beach and the hotel located at 229 Coronado - I think its called the Sunrise. I need this by the end of the week if possible. Thanks! Gina L. Clayton Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater gina.clayton@myclearwater.com <mailto:gina.clayton@myclearwater.com> 727-562-4587 CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner: Applicant: Representative: Address: • September 20, 2005 FLD2005-07061 G4 Sunrise on the Beach, Inc. Mark International, LLC Mr. Keith Zayac, Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 229 Coronado Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: ORIGINAL REQUEST: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation rooms/units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6- 109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 90 feet along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 53.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.13. EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District; Residential Facilities High (RFH) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.454 acres; 19,800 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodations (22 rooms/units) Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (16 units - condominium) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Tourist District; Overnight accommodations LAND USES: East: Tourist District; Detached dwellings South: Tourist District; Restaurant and overnight accommodations West: Tourist District; Overnight accommodations and attached dwellings (under construction - Hyatt) Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07061 - Page 1 of 9 • • CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is a mixture of overnight accommodation uses and commercial uses. Resort hotels are under construction or to be constructed to the west and northwest. Detached dwellings are to the east. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.454 acres is located on the north side of Third Street between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive. The site is a triple-fronted lot with 90 feet of frontage along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive and 220 feet of front along Third Street. The site is currently developed with a motel of 22 rooms/units. Parking for the current development is located partially within and backs into the right-of-way. The existing building is two-stories in height with a pool at the corner of Hamden Drive and Third Street. All existing improvements are proposed to be demolished. The site is located within the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" of Beach by Design, which is a distinctive area of mixed uses including high-rise condominiums, resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach By Design contemplates this District will be an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach. A restaurant and overnight accommodation use exists to the south across Third Street. There are other existing overnight accommodation uses to the north of this site. There are two resort hotels approved to the west and northwest of this site (both with an attached dwelling component). Directly west, the Hyatt project is currently under construction. The Patel project is to the northwest of this site (and north of the Hyatt project). There do exist detached dwellings to the east along Devon Drive. Proposal: The proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for the nonconforming density of 22 overnight accommodation rooms/units. Based on current Land Use Category density limitations of 30 dwelling units per acre for residential uses, the overall subject site may be redeveloped with a maximum of 13 dwelling units. The applicant is requesting to terminate the nonconforming density in order to redevelop the site with 16 new attached dwellings. Under the Termination of Status of Nonconformity provisions, there are four required improvements: 1. Installation of perimeter buffers. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Improvement of off-street parking lots. The applicant is removing all existing improvements and is providing parking that meets Code provisions. 3. Removal of nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures. The applicant is removing all existing improvements. Any future signage will need to meet current. Code provisions. 4. Use of Comprehensive Sign Program and Comprehensive Landscape Programs to satisfy requirements. The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available under the Code to residential properties. The Comprehensive Landscape Program is unnecessary. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07061 - Page 2 of 9 The proposal is to demolish the existing motel and construct a residential building with four living floors over ground level parking. The site has been designed with the building meeting the required front (south, east and west - 15 feet) and side (north - 10 feet) setbacks. Cantilevered balconies extend two feet from the fagade of the building, which is the maximum amount allowable within required setbacks. The request includes reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 90 feet along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive. This site is a triple-fronted lot, where the lot width is applied to each street frontage. With 220 feet of frontage along Third Street, the building has been oriented toward Third Street. Even being short by 10 feet on the lot width north to south, the proposal has been designed to comply with required setbacks to the building and pavement. The requested reductions to the minimum lot width requirement is minimal, in light of the site design where the applicant has been able to provide a majority of site improvements meeting Code requirements. The reduction in lot width along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity (see discussion below regarding building height). The proposal includes a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area) and a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk). With regard to the front setback reduction related to the trash staging area, the building will have a refuse collection room on the ground floor within the parking garage. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site and is common with many newer developments. With regard to the side setback reduction along the north side for sidewalks, by Building Code requirements, the egress stairs at the northwest corner of the building and east of midpoint of the building must be provided with a sidewalk out to the sidewalk within the Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive rights-of-way. These sidewalks do not extend the entire distance along the north side of the building, and therefore provides adequate planting area for landscaping. Parking spaces for the current site improvements straddle the front property lines along Third Street, Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive (partially on-site and partially within the right-of-way). The proposal will eliminate all parking within the right-of-way and will provide 24 parking spaces on-site (Code minimum requirement is 1.5 spaces per unit or 24 spaces for 16 dwellings). Parking will be provided at ground level under the building. Parking is proposed to be accessed by one-way driveways on Third Street. The driveway location on Third Street is preferable to rather locating on Coronado Drive, due to Coronado Drive being rebuilt under Beach Walk to be the arterial street for this portion of South Beach. This driveway location is also preferred to rather locating on Hamden Drive, due to the existing detached dwellings located on Devon Drive. As such, the site design minimizes traffic congestion. The applicant is proposing to fully enclose the parking level to screen views of the vehicles from adjacent properties and rights-of-way. A portion of the building is located within the sight visibility triangles at the entrance and exit driveways. Due to the building meeting the required 15-foot front setback, the issues of visibility at these driveways Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07061 - Page 3 of 9 • has been determined to have minimal impacts on vehicular and pedestrian safety. Sidewalks will be constructed in the rights-of-way where none exists today, increasing pedestrian safety. The proposal includes constructing these 16 attached dwellings (condominiums) in a building of "coastal" architecture with four living floors over the ground-level parking. The proposal includes four dwellings per floor, two on each side of a central elevator located along the northern portion of the building. This building design incorporates an "indentation" of the south building fagade, centered around the one-way driveways, a ground-level pool and the elevator. The parking level will be painted a dark sand color, with the living levels painted a light sand, and the metal roof will be patina green in color. The roof is a pitched roof, but will have level areas on either side of the elevator for rooftop air conditioning units (which will be screened by parapets). The proposal includes an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 53.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). The Hyatt project directly west of this site will have a building height of 150 feet. This proposed height is viewed as transitioning height within this area from those projects facing the beach between Coronado Drive and South Gulfview Boulevard at 150 feet tall to the detached dwellings along Devon Drive east of Hamden Drive. As such, this proposal will be compatible and consistent with, and in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of, adjacent properties and properties in the vicinity. As mentioned previously, a pool is proposed between the one-way driveways and will be screened/enclosed by a four-foot high fence. Site drainage is proposed within retention areas adjacent to the east and west ends of the building along Hamden Drive and Coronado Drive. The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. It is noted that the Code does not provide the ability to request a Comprehensive Sign Program for a residential property. Future signage will need to meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign would need to be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and attached dwelling criteria (Section 2-803.B) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07061 - Page 4 of 9 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 16 dwelling units (a) X* DENSITY (40 rooms/units per acre or 30 dwelling units per acre) (18 rooms/units or 13 dwelling units maximum) IMPERVIOUS 0.63 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) 0.95 maximum LOT AREA (10,000 0.454 acres; 19,800 square feet X s q. feet minimum) LOT WIDTH (100 South: 220 feet X* feet minimum) East (Hamden Drive): 90 feet West (Coronado Drive): 90 feet FRONT SETBACK South: 15 feet (to building and pool) X (0-15 feet) and zero feet (to trash staging area) East (Hamden Drive): 15 feet (to building) West (Coronado Drive): 15 feet (to building) REAR SETBACK N/A (This is a triple-fronted corner X (10-20 feet) lot) SIDE SETBACK North: 10 feet (to building) and six X* (0-10 feet) feet (to sidewalk) HEIGHT (35-100 feet) 53.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) X* PARKING SPACES 24 spaces (1.5 spaces per unit) X (1.5 spaces per unit - attached dwellings; 24 spaces required) (a) Includes the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for 16 existing attached dwellings. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07061 - Page 5 of 9 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH ATTACHED DWELLING FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2- 803.B): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a X building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not X involve direct access to an arterial street. 3. Height: X a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building. 4. Setbacks: X a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. 5. Off-street parking: X a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07061 - Page 6 of 9 9 0 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.454 acres is zoned Tourist District and is located within the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is for 22 overnight accommodation rooms/units, which is nonconforming to current density maximum (18 rooms/units for overnight accommodation uses or 13 dwelling units); 3. The applicant is deriving the proposed 16 attached dwelling units through the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for the existing 22 attached dwelling units, converted on a 40/30 ratio; 4. The applicant proposes to redevelop the entire site in a residential building 53.5 feet tall (to midpoint of the pitched roof); 5. The proposal complies with the required front and side setback requirements to building, pavement and pool deck: 6. Setback reductions are for the trash staging area (front) and for required egress sidewalks from the building stairs (side - north); 7. The proposal eliminates all existing parking within the rights-of-way and will construct sidewalks in the rights-of-way where none exists today, increasing pedestrian safety; 8. The proposal will construct parking under the building at the minimum amount required by Code for the proposed number of dwellings; 9. The proposed height is compatible with other surrounding existing, under construction or approved developments, transitioning height from the resort hotels to the west between Coronado Drive and South Gulfview Boulevard and the detached dwellings to the east along Devon Drive; and 10. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07061 - Page 7 of 9 0 0 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density complies with the criteria of Section 6-109; 2. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.B; 3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 4. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 5. Based on the above findings, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 4, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development application to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 90 feet along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 53.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B, for the site at 229 Coronado Drive with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed, restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07061 - Page 8 of 9 0 0 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 6. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; and 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: P`4.. ti - kj" Wayne . Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S.Tlanning DeparhnentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Tending casesVp for the next CDBICoronado 229 Sunrise Condos (T) - 9.20.05 CDB - WWICoronado 229 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07061 - Page 9 of 9 FLD2005-07061 229 CORONADO DR Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 07/31/2005 Indicate on Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 the distance the cantilevered balconies and overhangs Not Met extend from the face of the building. 07/31/2005 Indicate on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 the balcony extension on the north side of the eastern portion Not Met of the building (see Sheet A-4). 07/31/2005 Sheet A-4 - Indicate the location of all windows and door on the exterior of the building on the Not Met "typical floor plan" (see Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3). 07/31/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits. 07/31/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 07/31/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 07/31/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 07/31/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 07/31/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 07/31/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. 07/31/2005 Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 - Provide the height from BFE to the top of the highest roof ridge and to the top of the elevator tower. Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 09/09/2005 Page 2 of 2 ?,,Conditions Associated With FLD2005-07061 229 CORONADO DR ti Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 07/31/2005 Sheet 5/5 - Indicate the number of plants in each location of Pittosporum (correct spelling in Plant Not Met List), as has been done for all other plants/trees. 07/31/2005 Sheet 5/5 - Any changes to the landscape plan must also be approved by the City (not just the Not Met Landscape Architect). Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 07/25/2005 Provide a tree removal plan prior to Building Permit. Not Met Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 07/20/2005 Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if Not Met applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 07/21/2005 Show where recycling carts will be placed for residents Not Met Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 07/15/2005 Provide City standard H/C parking spaces. Missing 5'x 19' h/c aisle. 8/18/05 - COLUMNS SHALL Not Met NOT ENCRAOCH INTO THE ACCESSIBLE AISLES ADJACENT THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACES 2. Columns must not encroach inside parking space dimensions. Columns must be protected from vehicle bumpers, use wheel stops. 8/18/05 - MET 3. Remove concrete sidewalk from Hamden Drive to the site. 8/18/05 - MET 4. Driveway curb radius and width must meet Fire Department's approval. 8/18/05 - SEE APPLICANT RESPONSE 5. Vertical height clearance for parking garage must be a minimum of 8' 2" to accommodate h/c van per Florida Building Code Chapter 11. 8/18/05 - ACKNOWLEDGED 6. Show dimensions of driveways, drive aisles and parking spaces. 8/18/05 - MET All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 07/12/2005 Since the request now has been revised to include a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for Not Met density, need to address in writing the requirements of Section 6-109.C: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(D). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. Print Date: 09/09/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 2 F5LOC:?)ms_ C) as cuir 679 CITY OF CLEARAATEE ' S2/03 32/0 • 9 PBtE1LA8 OOtl11TT, tLOHl04 2 x 3 8 EIRSf " i° >' ••2 ? • PREPARED BY PUBIC WORg ADDd11NMft' ON a Sn1EEf R M 3 WATER LOT A to S tp0 8. N?yMM1Ie Are., C4pWO1w, tL J3778 PR: (8U)38t-1730. Fat (813)326-/733 ?. ? >: .,a p n110://WrW.e1s01WOlw-a?omlmOtnsr/ s ' i e m1 52 9a o l a+nam? l 0 • N t 0 53 9B e y e t i _ cim"Iff l f 7 Sa IDD C PODIk Nab AOm hllotbn/EngM••rbp , mwt or ace•Dtse 011 ,Id by the WIPItnt With the w4ff, andbp Ihot the dalo D.n 181_787 8 t/d g O 2 d• d 9 V 10 rlLYh?d rot eldl"IId (6, the Dwpeee of d optg o ¢ODMe v1nlay, N suM, tM Nty of g- .W P11A/E f '• •/I 3 1Q 11 9 1p2 to a g 12 d 1J 7, , mO k11 no rp an 1•A sdD/N1s0 01 Impllld, eengminy0 nl Oeto/ay, eomdelMest Ie tbIlly, 01 wltMBily of Ihft do10 V. eny OthN 01Dew I, i la Dn uo _.o, 1o 3•+/ 32 d gg g B 17 18 t9 1!0 2 23 21 2S 26 27 a m u . D wlhrrmere, lne CRy of Clam MeiN «WTh. s? MooR ly Wnotwewl oneeloled Wim the we S 0 0 71 101 1 •t• 51 E >? I R As 29 ' t ,2 2wW SO 9 g p ,p se ? R A.- ?° KIM. Tnis A8n po0• IW w0 to Deriodk dm.. TO, Mamotbn o0001 blest ferlsiens ObOm -11 PWA/E or o Jot S7REEf s7 p _ a a t Q •d/ a5 t1 TRe IDS m0 30 ? ? ! 1 .NII ow WeD dle. • 1 43 42 ap 79 y 1 am 13 t 3e 37 33 34 331 32 31 N 010 08 m? bs 2 I 14 80 8 + to ? 1 to ? 81 08 nt 3 1 19 + its •ro /t1t •n 62 + 0 am •f S C2 P 2A st 1 18 e3 ' 0 100 200 490 eqo _ in ass 64 BM 3 SCALE: 1" >• 400' 19 7 on 3A • •H e5 11 an zo ee A aA E a" PPIR LEGEND: 21 1S of p• 57 y 87 1D eG3S ? So P 22 pp;; 8g Sa 5S 32 sA so a3 ae a7 /e /S a/ /S ax 08 7f R at ap 39 O BLOCK NUMBER 2S sis Bg 118 It 7 so 38 V. 3a •'4 e81 p1 tMAtIIR Js 24 b &BeR gg$d 70 119as 34 i d V 1234 LOT ADDRESS etE •n a , O dRR Bad 25 Ms 2 l ! I g 33 dao ?d W ??--? CITY LIM TS y n •J• 71 1x0 3 a S 8 7 d C ? 1 f2 £ $ 11g ): I ®y32 3t ' I LINE tin ` V \ q 1/!;A 9 ,0 'j 13 1a 15 to 0 26 8 FltT1 10 IDA 9A 287} q a, 7x STe f Y 20 g d ,tl - 30 21 ? ? N C' 22 23 d r°-1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY E"'-•J OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS J eJ 8 1x1 xSd 7? 73 122 ,Po 12 IA f+ ro• a xe x7 2a A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX i x 2a r1 w, 74 p 11 29 .4 i5 121 1y1 3 m N M• t M 1 CITY OWNED PROPERTY • 30 I/O 76 125 1 v9p d3 2 3 / S a I U8 A at R $ - 7 1/ t D ' MDR ZONING DESIGNATION & If 77 120 3 ?? f o 17 1 0 ,0 11 f2 t3 9 ? ? ? 8. 79 N ?+ 22 ZONE LINE Jt ,e i27 2 ow 3 h 2 F g 4 & 9A£ ? 32 Il6id79 +2811/ 1n 6 = V A & ?' d v § C 13 33 a 3 a 5 8 7 8 92 f0 TI it 13 14 1s 32 12 11 ? p7 `130 p e d , E ? / et S 3a e2 l3+ e 10 A S B sd f ?d°?? 3s /,e e3 13I N •?° ?6,? O Ja .+^ 84 8 134 3 7 ? ? e yy B ` e7 .9 F • 440 HEST ,D j] o Comm 04, 22-27 ' 38 6 • REVISED I s SAYNAT amp a ? e 7 e . 03/08/99 , - - ' ZONING ATLAS 10 SSA SW 1/4 OF SECTION 2 76A 285 5 - 29 S - 15 E I 1 0 Pinellas County Property App?er Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 06 Page 2 of 8 08 / 29 / 15 / 17568 / 000 / 0010 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:35:46 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales K & P CLEARWATER ESTATE II LLC OBK: 14491 OPG: 1067 5600 MARINER ST STE 227 TAMPA FL 33609 EVAC; A EVAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr; 229 CORONADO DR of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 7 /2,005 14,491/1,067 4,150,000 (Q) I 1950: Book 026 Pgs 075- 6 /2,000 10,945/1,062 1,400,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 7 /1,996 9,397/ 601 1,175,000 (0) I 0000: Book Pgs - 5 /1,993 8,2871 378 148,000 (U) I 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 1,500,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % 000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: 000 Assessed/Cap: 1,500,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt; 000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1,500,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Bay Clearwater View: 05 Millage; 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 26,414.81 1) 90 x 220 80.00 19, 800. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 . 00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 34, 855.80 6) 0 x 0 00 00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 34,855.80 Short Legal COLUMBIA SUB REPLAT S 90FT OF LOTS i AND 2 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlegi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 040 Property and Land Use-Code descriptions . Building_ 1 . Building 2. . Bu_ildi , 3 . Building _4 Building #1 Page 3 of 8 08 / 29 / 15 / 17508 / 000 / 0010 :01 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:35:38 Commercial Card 01 of 4 Improvement Type: Hotel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 229 CORONADO DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1?m?nts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 6 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,952 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1') Base Area 1.00 1,020 7) 00 0 2) 00 0 8) 00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) 00 0 5) 00 0 11) 00 0 6) 00 0 12) 00 0 C amm (--r c i a l E x t r a F? at ur c s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 5000SF 1.50 5,000 71500 7,500 999 2) POOL IRRG 25,000.00 1 25,000 14,000 1,972 3) PATIO/DECK 500 3. 00 500 1,500 , 1,430 2,002 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 22,930 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 0? Page 4 of 8 Building #2 08 / 29 / 15 / 17568 / 000 / 0010 :02 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:35:38 Commercial Card 02 of 4 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel < 4 St Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E 14emertt s Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Cone Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Hone Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 24 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 11952 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,076 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch 30 1,068 8) 00 0 3) Upper Stry Base Area 90 2,316 4) 00 0 4) 00 0 10) 00 0 5) .00 0 11) 00 0 6) 00 0 12) 00 0 Commercial Extra FsatureFm- Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) SHED 6X12 5. 00 72 360 140 1,952 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 140 Building #3 http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.usihtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b= l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/31/2.005 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 0? Page 5 of 8 08 / 29 / 15 I 17588 1 000 / 0010 :03 3i-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:35:46 Commercial Card 03 of 4 Improvement Type: Hotel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1?msnts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 6 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,952 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 900 7) 00 0 2) Open Porch 30 396 8) 00 0 3) 00 0 9) .00 0 4) 00 0 10) 00 0 5) . 00 0 11) 00 0 6) 00 0 12) 00 0 {C omm e r c i a l E x t r a F at ur s s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #4 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l &a=l &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 040 Page 6 of 8 08 / 29 / 15 / 17508 / 000 / 0010 :04 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:35:53 Commercial Card 04 of 4 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel t 4 St Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1?m?nts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Cone Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish. Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 36 Bath Tile Wall Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,955 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 2, 500 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch 30 1,200 8) 00 0 3) Upper Stry Base Area 90 2,500 9) 00 0 4) 00 0 10) 00 0 5) 00 0 11) 00 0 6) 00 0 12) 00 0 Commercial Extra F4B atur(?: s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*_1 [;?] Fil T M U-1 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l &a=l &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 0? +?U LF0VIE?1i 35 CiDVF P! BL. VD _ l 215 - C; U L F''' I Et4? r BLVD 5 -- 010 G UL F'V I E'dr BL`v°D J 311 GULFVIEW BLVD C.ORO D 7?PR 3RD T 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) Page 7 of 8 112_ Dy R ? z http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/31/2005 } e +MU _.i? ?. .rte F R F d" a r Back._to.__S_earchP age. An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/31/2005 0 9 Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:35 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD:2005-07061 zone.doc location.doc existing.doc aerial.doc Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 12:26 PM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 229 Coronado Drive Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-07061 for the property at 229 Coronado Drive. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne FLD Map request form.doc Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2005-07061 Date Requested: August 20, 2005 Date Requested for (date): September 2, 2005 Maps Requested x? Location Map x? Aerial Map x? Zoning Map x? Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering x? Legal Description x? Survey x? Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: Sunrise on the Beach, Inc. Case: FLD2005-07061 site: Property 229 Coronado Drive Size(Acres): 0.454 PIN: 08/29/15/17568/000/0010 Atlas Page: 276A A 21 2 32/02 32/03 3 Y pp?T at as 0 p I 4 STREET A N 3 g ao r S 8 mr 52 98 t ? S} 89 m ny 7 6.a far-760 8 b1 tl -} St too y O 2(4 8 by .n ? 9 S 02 U tnt ?A Da 17q-e07 to Sere eyy 32 e 11 a 5 +0a + ar in 51 2 tJ0 r 12 D o A t01 'STREET Y 711a 103 l + re bf • 13 ? ro 100 #4 t e6 0 0 tpt a w' tt pe0 ,?((?? a 2? 1 ? ne ... S " la 63 1 18 See elr ata 6EV 19 ay 64 ap6S tt 3 ap rt, 7 Sea 20 as Ave 21 10 WaB t0 q S ? V I 67 h It 6 l r P 22 e6 l A 23 4 40 69 tt6 all 7 A 4 2 .6/ 70 119 aq ed 1 ' 23 Car 71 120 6 I e,+ 9 Ira 28 $ r11?M I f Q1 Sea 9A 26'? 4 or 72 121 S}gE3.y t0?a IDA • >I 27 A. 17pr. epl 73 122 t 12 IA epe pe 2a a w, 74 2 it m 29 .4 73 124 3 0110 A a 1 30 ra 76 12S t ,? ?+ 9 ar 77 +26 8 6 ua e/ 9 31 76 127 r/ 2 32 r 126rae 79 r0 6 eH 3 h 33 161A 60 120 S 4687 t see 61 i30 S St 82 iJ1 35 .ta 63 132 E 440 HEST p CONDO a? 22-27 1678 ? .? CITY OF CLEARWATER ?a 4f PIREILAB CO RI rWRro1 PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION WAFER L07 A FNOar[[RINC 00 Y yrtlre Me„ Cka.aler, it 33756 Fe Pn.: (eulxY-ass roc (eta s:e-ass P MtD://efa.ele0reolw-aeam?enghe./ Dlegouaer. C 1 1 v 0 r N 1 0 P014 hformatbn 001a la furrdeMd by the city of Clewaoler PuW4 Nara Admhhlralbn/Engheerhtp, ono must oe accepted and used Oy the reelolenl trllh the undenlondhp Ihol the dole naMd • Collected far the purpose Of develophp 0 9'.Amt hfroelruclure hvehimy. As each, the city of Cteorw04r PWA/E matu na erarronlbe, eA?nueit or Img40, con0eminQQ the 12 oetwxy. comgeleona, rNbDlity, a su11oD011y of (n fa tlalo for 13 1d ony ether porliegar U_ , IS&_j. the City of Cleorrater ?? d f 6 17 19 19 I20 2 23 21 2S 27 a PWAA -scum ' na nwily .hot$.-, os.oclaled ellh the use mw.e W fuchdato. E F E ,,• x9 6 E 8 Thre All,, pogo I, !".=: 4d4 Ia hformollen aooul'.lDlta.e call PWAA a ! I< ? ya]D .hu our wee e11e. !S !! 41 ax !0 ? I 31 36 J7 JS >, 73 32 N P 0 190 240 490 640 1.. SCALE: 1' - 400' LEGEND: 46 a7 46 45 44 a3 ti !t !0 39 O BLOCK NUMBER d EE # E E EE EE E ?i EF ?fi cE Se o. 3c v 1234 LOT ADDRESS fx £@ E &E DRIVE ?????d34d 34 00 3 32 31 10. ?- CIiY LIMITS LINE t0 1J 13 tt 1S 16 0 Y 26 21 ?& 6 N 30 r-:1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY 22 x3 F 0y29 L-- OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS P 25 26 27 20 A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX CITY OWNED PROPERTY gill 1: UB A / MDR ZONING DESIGNATION 10 +; 12 t3 14 16 17 18.9 20D 41 22 .. ZONE LINE DAYSIDE . +t RAG . o 1 7 16 19`r f0 171112 I13 114 1 is 1321:iJ 12 It a I?A r 2 ? ?n ills d ?3 4 e Ir s ., ? 6 7 ? 9ASA P ??Rd F REVISED: 03/08/99 ZONING ATLAS SW 1/4 OF SECTION 2 6 A A 8 -29S-15E 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 11:30 AM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: 'amber@keithzayac.com' Subject: FLD2005-07061, 229 Coronado Drive Keith - The following represents comments from my (Zoning and Landscaping) reviews and Engineering reviews that still need to be addressed in the application materials. The case is being scheduled for the 9/20/05 CDB meeting, but the application materials for all 15 packets need to be amended, hopefully by August 26, 2005. 1. The responses to DRC comments says that there is an attachment to the application addressing the Termination of Status of Nonconformity requirements, but I don't see it. Might it be Attachment E? Could you please email or fax it to me and I will insert it into the packages? 2. 1 asked to have the trash room identified on the plans. The civil plans now indicate the location of the trash room. Based on the architectural plans, which don't indicate any trash chute per floor, is the circumstance that the residents will have to bring there trash downstairs and place it in the trash container in the trash room on the ground floor? 3. Attachment B and Sheets A-1 thru A-3 indicate the height of 53.5 feet from BFE, yet Sheet 3/5 indicates 55 feet. Sheet 3/5 can be redlined or changed out (if so, bring #1). 4. Previously I had asked "Indicate on Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 the distance the cantilevered balconies and overhangs extend from the face of the building." The response was to amend Sheet 3/5, which was fine for the balconies. However, I also wanted to know the roof overhang, since it extends greater than the balconies. Could you at least give me a written response so as to be able to check whether it meets Code? 5. Previously I had asked "Indicate on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 the balcony extension on the north side of the eastern portion of the building (see Sheet A-4)." This balcony is not shown on these sheets. 6. Previously I had asked "Sheet A-4 - Indicate the location of all windows and door on the exterior of the building on the "typical floor plan" (see Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3)." This was not done. 7. Revise Sheet 5/5 in the Plant List to indicate 175 RI, 182 PTV and 130 LM (may be redlined if you so choose). 8. Previously I had asked "Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 - Provide the height from BFE to the top of the highest roof ridge and to the top of the elevator tower." This was not done. 9. Revise the General Notes #3 on Sheet 3/5 to 22 overnight accommodations. 10. From the Traffic review - Provide City standard H/C parking spaces. Missing 5' x 19' h/c aisle. 8/18/05 - AISLES PROVIDED. COLUMNS SHALL NOT ENCRAOCH INTO THE ACCESSIBLE AISLES ADJACENT THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACES. If you have questions, call me or email me. Wayne • • Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:46 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-07061 - 229 Coronado Wayne, One outstanding issue regarding the site plan: Traffic Provide City standard H/C parking spaces. Missing 5'x 19' h/c aisle. 8/18/05 - AISLES PROVIDED. COLUMNS SHALL NOT ENCRAOCH INTO THE ACCESSIBLE AISLES ADJACENT THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACES D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com fA? ? 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 12:37 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Cc: DRC Members Subject: RE: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB Revised and updated PP as needed. 655 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 1770 Drew- Conditions met. 401 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 342 Hamden- No Issues. 691 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 706 Bayway- No Issues. 475 East Shore- Condition met. 1460 Missouri- No Issues. 1200 Betty Ln- No Issues. 566 Bay Esplanade- Conditions met. 229 Coronado- Condition to be met at building permit. 621 Bay Esplanade- No Issues. 600 Pennsylvania- ?????? 1242 Cleveland- Revised condition to be met at building permit. -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:48 AM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB The following cases have been resubmitted from prior DRC meetings. Prior to being scheduled for the 9/20/05 CDB meeting agenda, please come by our office and review the following cases based on your comments on Permit Plan. If the revisions are acceptable, meaning that from your standpoint it may be scheduled for the CDB, or if there are still outstanding comments that would prevent it from being scheduled for CDB, please let the case planner know. Please review the following cases by end of the day tomorrow, August 17, 2005. Thanks. 655 S Gulfview Blvd FLD2005-07072 1770 Drew Street - FLD2005-06054 401 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-07068 342 Hamden Drive - FLD2005-07066 691 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-06057 706 Bayway Blvd - FLD2005-07070 475 East Shore Drive - FLD2005-06056 1460 S Missouri Avenue - FLD2005-08039 1200 N Betty Lane - FLD2005-07063 566 Bay Esplanade Avenue - FLD2005-07065 229 Coronado Drive - FLD2005-07061 621 Bay Esplanade - FLD2005-07064 600 Pennsylvania Avenue - FLD2005-06055 1242 Cleveland Street - FLD200058 0 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:48 AM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB The following cases have been resubmitted from prior DRC meetings. Prior to being scheduled for the 9/20/05 CDB meeting agenda, please come by our office and review the following cases based on your comments on Permit Plan. If the revisions are acceptable, meaning that from your standpoint it may be scheduled for the CDB, or if there are still outstanding comments that would prevent it from being scheduled for CDB, please let the case planner know. Please review the following cases by end of the day tomorrow, August 17, 2005. Thanks. 655 S Gulfview Blvd FLD2005-07072 1770 Drew Street - FLD2005-06054 401 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-07068 342 Hamden Drive - FLD2005-07066 691 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-06057 706 Bayway Blvd - FLD2005-07070 475 East Shore Drive - FLD2005-06056 1460 S Missouri Avenue - FLD2005-08039 1200 N Betty Lane - FLD2005-07063 566 Bay Esplanade Avenue - FLD2005-07065 J 229 Coronado Drive - FLD2005-07061 621 Bay Esplanade - FLD2005-07064 600 Pennsylvania Avenue - FLD2005-06055 1242 Cleveland Street - FLD2005-06058 11.40 am Case Number: FLD2005-070 -- 229 CORONADO DR Owner(s): Sunrise On The Beach Inc 229 Coronado Dr ' Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, Applicant Mark International, Llc 1015 Eldorado Avenue Clearwater, Fl 33767 • FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email TELEPHONE: 727-447-5121, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac Fiew 1 6%4% IV p?Lc 701 Enterprise Road East Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: 0.454 acres located on the north side of Third Avenue between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (24 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 90 feet along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 55 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III. Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard Applicant/Rep: Keith Zayac, Kirit Shah, Ed Hooper, Joe Burdette The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Beachwalk plan specifies a 7-foot sidewalk to be constructed along Coronado Drive; revise plans accordingly. 2. Applicant and applicant's contractor shall coordinate construction activities, particularly utility, sidewalk and driveway construction, with the city's Beachwalk contractor. 3. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 , 1) No Issues. Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 22 ***PLEASE NO *** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2 . This property must be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting all the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Clearances of 7 1/2 feeet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Fire Department connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in acordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of.appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent of comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Provide a tree removal plan prior to Building Permit. Landscaping: 1 . Sheet 5/5 - Indicate the number of plants in each location of Pittosporum (correct spelling in Plant List), as has been done for all other plants/trees. 2 . Sheet 5/5 - Coordinate proposed landscape materials with the location of retention ponds on both the east and west sides of the building (Pittosporum, hibuscus and liriope indicated to be planted on the slopes and bottom of the retention ponds). Revise. 3 . Sheet 5/5 - Any changes to the landscape plan must also be approved by the City (not just the Landscape Architect). Parks and Recreation: I . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: I _ 1. Required Volume of pond must follow City of Clearwater Stormwater Design Criteria where Vol = delta C x A x i x 3600; where i is intensity of 25-year, 1-hour storm (3.6 in/hr). Additionally, the existing impervious area is limited to a 50% credit in the predevelopment C calculations (use a value of .49 rather than .98). 2. Please review the predevelopment C calculation for area of Open Space. Viewing the existing survey, it appears that there is significantly less existing area than reported in the calculations. All of the above prior to CDB. 1. Prior to building permit, please demonstrate that the two 6" PVC will be sufficient to equalize the two ponds and ensure that operate as one. Solid Waste: 1 . Show where recycling carts will be placed for residents Traffic Engineering: I . Provide City standard H/C parking spaces. Missing 5'x 19'11/c aisle. 2. Columns must not encroach inside parking space dimensions. Columns must be protected from vehicle bumpers, use wheel stops. 3. Remove concrete sidewalk from Hamden Drive to the site. 4. Driveway curb radius and width must meet Fire Department's approval. 5. Vertical height clearance for parking garage must be a minimum of 8' 2" to accommodate h/c van per Florida Building Code Chapter 11. 6. Show dimensions of driveways, drive aisles and parking spaces. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 23 Planning: 0 • 1 . Since the request now has been revised to include a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density, need to address in writing the requirements of Section 6-109.C: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(D). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 2. 7/12/05 - WW Sidewalks have been shown on the east and west sides of the building near the north side of the building; however, the sidewalks are not located where the architectural plans indicate the doors from the stairs to be (see Sheet A-4). Revise/coordinate Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5. 7/8/05 - WW Building Code will require a sidewalk from each of the stairwells to the public sidewalk within the rights-of-way, and pedestrians cannot exit into the parking garage. Show the location of the required sidewalks on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 & 515. 3 . 7/12/05 - WW Indicate/show on Sheets 3/5 and A-4 the location of trash rooms (ground floor and upper floors). 7/8/05 - WW Show the location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701) ; 4. 7/12/05 - WW Prior comment was to have the height DIMENSIONED from BFE to the midpoint of the pitched roof. Revise Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 to indicate such height. 7/8/05 - WW Indicate on the building elevations the height dimensioned from BFE to the midpoint of the pitched roof and the proposed colors and materials of the exterior of the building. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 24 Application submitte is a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment ProjeUnclear, based on the requests, why this has been submitted, as only a Flexible Development application form for attached dwellings needs to be submitted. Revise. Address/provide SPECIFIC AND DETAILED responses to the Flexible Development criteria for "attached dwellings" of Section 2-803.13 as to HOW this proposal meets the criteria: 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building; 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; 5. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 6 . Revise Attachment B, Description of Requests, to that indicated above. Address all requests in the responses to the criteria. 7 . Column locations appear to be incomplete. Some columns are indicated on Sheets 3/5, 4/5, 5/5 and A-4. Show all column locations on these sheets. Column is shown within the eastern stairwell. Unclear if this meets Building Code. Advise/revise. 8 . Indicate on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 with a dashed line (similar to balconies) the building indentation in the center north of the pool (see Sheet A-4). 9. Indicate on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 515 what type of fencing is proposed around the pool. 10. Two sidewalks are indicated from the elevator area to the sidewalk in the right-of-way of Third Avenue on either side of the pool. Only one is necessary. Revise. 11 . Sheet 3/5 - Dimension the width and length of parking spaces, width of driveways and the width of the drive aisle. 12 . Recommend providing two parking spaces per unit. 13 . Any proposed storage units on the ground floor? If so, show location and design/layout. 14 . Indicate on Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 the distance the cantilevered balconies and overhangs extend from the face of the building. 15 . Indicate on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 the balcony extension on the north side of the eastern portion of the building (see Sheet A-4). 16. Sheet A-4 - Indicate the location of all windows and door on the exterior of the building on the "typical floor plan" (see Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3). 17 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 25 18. Potential condition approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 19. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 20 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 21 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 22 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 23 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. 24. Response to comments dated 7/11/05 indicates the a/c units will be on the roof, however, based on the elevations, the roof is a pitched roof. Unclear where a/c units will be placed on the pitched roof. Advise/revise. 25 . A letter has been submitted from Metro Architectural Design indicating the exterior facade materials, including the roof and railing material and color. Prior comment was to have these indicated on the elevations. Also provide the proposed color of the exterior facade material (not indicated in the letter - color renderings indicate more than one building color). Railings - clear glass or a colored glass? Railing frame - natural aluminum color, bronzed or a color frame? Revise Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 to indicate such exterior materials and colors. 26. Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 - Provide the height from BFE to the top of the highest roof ridge and to the top of the elevator tower. 27 . Application indicates 24 existing overnight accommodation units/rooms, however, under Occupational License OCL9007471, there are only 22 overnight accommodation units/rooms. With the conversion calculation, these 22 units/rooms convert to 16 dwelling units (which is the proposed number of dwelling units). Revise Sheet 3/5 and the application Attachments B and C. 28 . Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #1 - 1. The proposed architectural theme of this building is Mediterranean? 2. Be more specific regarding the proposed harmony relating to density as to the area. 3. Provide specifics as to HOW this project is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the surrounding properties/projects. 29. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #2 - 1. Provide details as to HOW this project is "consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses" and "other properties on Coronado Drive." 2. Provide the value of the project/property when completed. 30. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #3 - 1. Revise the number of existing units/rooms to 22. 2. Potentially speak to the redevelopment of the site with the elimination of parking that exists within or partially within the rights-of-way that backs into the streets and the provision of public sidewalks where none exists today increasing the safety aspects for pedestrians. 31 . Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #4 - Potentially speak to the redevelopment of the site with the elimination of parking that exists within or partially within the rights-of-way that backs into the streets and essentially creates long existing driveways, whereas the proposal restricts the driveways to the two one-way driveways and the provision of public sidewalks where none exists today increasing the safety aspects for pedestrians. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 26 32 . Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #5 - 1. The proposed architectural theme of this building is Mediterranean? 2. Not only speak to the existing character of surrounding properties, but also the emerging character including the Hyatt project to the west and the Patel project to the northwest (as well as any other recently approved projects). 33 . Address the issue that the proposed building is within the visibility triangles at the proposed driveways and the related safety aspects, within as many responses to criteria as necessary. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 9/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 8/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 27 11:40 am Case Number: FLD2005-070b1 -- 229 CORONADO DR Owner(s): Sunrise On The Beach Inc 229 Coronado Dr Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, Applicant Mark International, Llc 1015 Eldorado Avenue Clearwater, Fl 33767 FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email TELEPHONE: 727-447-5121, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac DRIC cavvlmaAt 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: 0.454 acres located on the north side of Third Avenue between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (24 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 90 feet along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 55 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive ` TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net $NA1N Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner 111 L,&M P- V ty-a / Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne `Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, k? Applicant/Rep: Keith Zayac, e a ??? ' , J -, a- J r? The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Beachwalk plan specifies a 7-foot sidewalk to be constructed along Coronado Drive; revise plans accordingly. 2. Applicant and applicant's contractor shall coordinate construction activities, particularly utility, sidewalk and driveway construction, with the city's Beachwalk contractor. 3. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . 1) No Issues. Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 27 1 . ***PLEASE NO'1" . REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AIORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2 , This property must be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting all the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Clearances of 7 1/2 feeet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Fire Department connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in acordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent of comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: Provide a tree removal plan prior to Building Permit. Landscaping: I . Sheet 5/5 - Indicate the number of plants in each location of Pittosporum (correct spelling in Plant List), as has been done for all other plants/trees. 2. Sheet 5/5 - Coordinate proposed landscape materials with the location of retention ponds on both the east and west sides of the building (Pittosporum, hibuscus and liriope indicated to be planted on the slopes and bottom of the retention ponds). Revise. 3 . Sheet 515 - Any changes to the landscape plan must also be approved by the City (not just the Landscape Architect). Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . I. Required Volume of pond must follow City of Clearwater Stormwater Design Criteria where Vol = delta C x A x i x 3600; where i is intensity of 25-year, 1-hour storm (3.6 in/hr). Additionally, the existing impervious area is limited to a 50% credit in the predevelopment C calculations (use a value of .49 rather than .98). 2. Please review the predevelopment C calculation for area of Open Space. Viewing the existing survey, it appears that there is significantly less existing area than reported in the calculations. All of the above prior to CDB. 1. Prior to building permit, please demonstrate that the two 6" PVC will be sufficient to equalize the two ponds and ensure that operate as one. Solid Waste: Show where recycling carts will be placed for residents Traffic Engineering: 1 . Provide City standard H/C parking spaces. Missing 5' x 19' h/c aisle. 2. Columns must not encroach inside parking space dimensions. Columns must be protected from vehicle bumpers, use wheel stops. 3. Remove concrete sidewalk from Hamden Drive to the site. 4. Driveway curb radius and width must meet Fire Department's approval. 5. Vertical height clearance for parking garage must be a minimum of 8' 2" to accommodate h/c van per Florida Building Code Chapter 11. 6. Show dimensions of driveways, drive aisles and parking spaces. All of the. above to be addressed prior to CDB. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 28 Planning: • • Since the request now has been revised to include a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density, need to address in writing the requirements of Section 6-109.C: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(D). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 7/12/05 - WW Sidewalks have been shown on the east and west sides of the building near the north side of the building; however, the sidewalks are not located where the architectural plans indicate the doors from the stairs to be (see Sheet A-4). Revise/coordinate Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5. 7/8/05 - WW Building Code will require a sidewalk from each of the stairwells to the public sidewalk within the rights-of-way, and pedestrians cannot exit into the parking garage. Show the location of the required sidewalks on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 & 5/5. 7/12/05 - WW Indicate/show on Sheets 3/5 and A-4 the location of trash rooms (ground floor and upper floors). 7/8/05 - WW Show the location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #7011; 7/12/05 - WW Prior comment was to have the height DIMENSIONED from BFE to the midpoint of the pitched roof. Revise Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 to indicate such height. 7/8/05 - WW Indicate on the building elevations the height dimensioned from BFE to the midpoint of the pitched roof and the proposed colors and materials of the exterior of the building. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 29 Application submiis a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Unclear, based on the requests, why this has been submitted, as only a Flexible Development application form for attached dwellings needs to be submitted. Revise. Address/provide SPECIFIC AND DETAILED responses to the Flexible Development criteria for "attached dwellings" of Section 2-803.13 as to HOW this proposal meets the criteria: 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building; 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; 5. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 6. Revise Attachment B, Description of Requests, to that indicated above. Address all requests in the responses to the criteria. 7. Column locations appear to be incomplete. Some columns are indicated on Sheets 3/5, 4/5, 5/5 and A-4. Show all column locations on these sheets. Column is shown within the eastern stairwell. Unclear if this meets Building Code. Advise/revise. 8 . Indicate on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 with a dashed line (similar to balconies) the building indentation in the center north of the pool (see Sheet A-4). 9. Indicate on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 what type of fencing is proposed around the pool. 10. Two sidewalks are indicated from the elevator area to the sidewalk in the right-of-way of Third Avenue on either side of the pool. Only one is necessary. Revise. 11 . Sheet 3/5 - Dimension the width and length of parking spaces, width of driveways and the width of the drive aisle. 12. Recommend providing two parking spaces per unit. 13 . Any proposed storage units on the ground floor? If so, show location and design/layout. 14 . Indicate on Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 the distance the cantilevered balconies and overhangs extend from the face of the building. 15 . Indicate on Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 the balcony extension on the north side of the eastern portion of the building (see Sheet A-4). 16. Sheet A-4 - Indicate the location of all windows and door on the exterior of the building on the "typical floor plan" (see Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3). 17 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 30 18 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: • That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 19 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 20. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 21 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 22 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 23 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. 24. Response to comments dated 7/11/05 indicates the a/c units will be on the roof; however, based on the elevations, the roof is a pitched roof. Unclear where a/c units will be placed on the pitched roof. Advise/revise. 25 . A letter has been submitted from Metro Architectural Design indicating the exterior facade materials, including the roof and railing material and color. Prior comment was to have these indicated on the elevations. Also provide the proposed color of the exterior facade material (not indicated in the letter - color renderings indicate more than one building color). Railings - clear glass or a colored glass? Railing frame - natural aluminum color, bronzed or a color frame? Revise Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 to indicate such exterior materials and colors. 26. Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 - Provide the height from BFE to the top of the highest roof ridge and to the top of the elevator tower. 27 . Application indicates 24 existing overnight accommodation units/rooms, however, under Occupational License OCL9007471, there are only 22 overnight accommodation units/rooms. With the conversion calculation, these 22 units/rooms convert to 16 dwelling units (which is the proposed number of dwelling units). Revise Sheet 315 and the application Attachments B and C. 28 . Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #1 - 1. The proposed architectural theme of this building is Mediterranean? 2. Be more specific regarding the proposed harmony relating to density as to the area. 3. Provide specifics as to HOW this project is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the surrounding properties/projects. 29. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #2 - 1. Provide details as to HOW this project is "consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses" and "other properties on Coronado Drive." 2. Provide the value of the project/property when completed. 30. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #3 - 1. Revise the number of existing units/rooms to 22. 2. Potentially speak to the redevelopment of the site with the elimination of parking that exists within or partially within the rights-of-way that backs into the streets and the provision of public sidewalks where none exists today increasing the safety aspects for pedestrians. 31 . Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #4 - Potentially speak to the redevelopment of the site with the elimination of parking that exists within or partially within the rights-of-way that backs into the streets and essentially creates long existing driveways, whereas the proposal restricts the driveways to the two one-way driveways and the provision of public sidewalks where none exists today increasing the safety aspects for pedestrians. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 31 32 . Attachment C - Gel Applicability criteria #5 - 1. The proposed architectural theme of this building is Mediterranean? 2. Not only speak to the existing character of surrounding properties, but also the emerging character including the Hyatt project to the west and the Patel project to the northwest (as well as any other recently approved projects). 33 . Address the issue that the proposed building is within the visibility triangles at the proposed driveways and the related safety aspects, within as many responses to criteria as necessary. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 9/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 8/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 32 CITY OF CLEARWATER ' 0 f, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES L MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING RIO 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL9007471 229 CORONADO DR SUNRISE RESORT Lic: 05978, Bus phone: (813) 446-9911 PEOPLE RoIe: Business Owner SUNRISE RESORT SUNRISE RESORT INC 229 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER, FL 33767-2431 PHONE: (727) 446-9911 FAX: No Fax FEES Assessed Amount LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL $429.55 Total $429.55 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category x`91000 RENTAL UNITS "ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 'Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL 01-02 Issue License Amount Paid Balance Due $429.55 $0.00 $429.55 $0.00 Quantity 22 Date 3 8/16/2000 10/20/1998 11/3/1999 8/15/2001 10/9/1997 Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH # Employees 0 Done Disp By DONE BLS DONE BLS DONE Janet McMahan DONE WBS DONE MBW r:\Forms\I nfoS um mary. rpt OCfM06 71 229 CORONADO DR Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 8/6/2002 02-03 Renewal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/11/2003 2003-2004 R;^newal Notice 7/26/2004 t 04/05 License - RENEWAL 8/12/2004 2004-2005 ti. . DONE BLS DONE DONE r:\Forms\ I nfoS u m m a ry. rpt Dikision of Corporations • Page 1 of 2 ?wyv Florida Limited Liability PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 1015 ELDORADO AVENUE CLEARWATER FL 33767 MARK INTERNATIONAL L.L.C. MAILING ADDRESS 1015 ELDORADO AVENUE CLEARWATER FL 33767 Document Number L02000031955 FEI Number 412070067 Date Filed 11/27/2002 State FL Total Contribution 0.00 Status ACTIVE Effective Date NONE Registered Agent Name & Address SHAH, KIRIT S 1015 ELDORADO AVENUE CLEARWATER FL 33767 Manager/Member Detail Titl e Name & Address SHAH, KIRIT S 1015 ELDORADO AVENUE MGRM CLEARWATER FL 33767 Annual Reports Report Year 11 Filed Date http : //www. sunbiz. org/scripts/c ordet. exe? a 1=DETFIL&n 1=LO200003195 5 &n2=NAMF WD ... 7/8/2005 ?-- Dkision of Corporations 0 is Page 2 of 2 Previous Filing Return to List I Next Filing No Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 04/27/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT 04/29/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT 04/17/2003 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 11/27/2002 -- Florida Limited Liabilites THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry Corporations Help i http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&n1=LO2000031955 &n2=NAMFWD... 7/8/2005 Jw I1%vision of Corporations Page 1 of 2 1?1 11 `,. r T r. ,. ? ,.. _ ( I 11"' 1 ? Gult'b.SffJT7r .CJr".i?'>'a; vow;' Florida Profit SUNRISE ON THE BEACH, INC. PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 229 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 MAILING ADDRESS 229 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 Document Number P00000048480 State FL FEI Number 593646371 Status ACTIVE Date Filed 05/16/2000 Effective Date 05/15/2000 Registered Agent Name & Address LOVELACE, WILLIAM K ESQ 401 LINCOLN AVE CLEARWATER FL Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title HEDQWIST, GUNNAR 229 CORONADO DR D CLEARWATER FL 33767 HEDQWIST, MONICA 229 CORONADO DR D CLEARWATER FL 33767 Annual Reports Report Year I- Filed Date http://www.sunbiz.orglscripts/cordet.exe?al =DETFIL&nl =P00000048480&n2=NAMFWD... 7/8/2005 D; vision of Corporations 0 0 Page 2 of 2 Previous Filing Return to List Next Filing No Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 04/26/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT 04/29/2004 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 01/29/2003 -- COR - ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 06/30/2002 -- COR - ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 05/12/2001 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 05/16/2000 -- Domestic Profit THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry Corporations Help ? http://vvww.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&nl =P00000048480&n2=NAMFWD... 7/8/2005 Pinollas County Property Appr* r Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 0? Page 2 of 8 08 / 29 / 15 / 17568 / 000 / 0010 08-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:22:10 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales SUNRISE ON THE BEACH INC OBK: 10945 OPG: 1062 229 CORONADO OR CLEARWATER FL 33767-2431 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 229 CORONADO DR of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 l f 2002 2003 es rom - : sa 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 6 /2,000 10,945/1,062 1,400,000 (Q) I 1950: Book 026 Pgs 075- 7 /1,996 9,397/ 601 i,175,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 5 /1,993 8,2871 378 148,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,971 3,586/ 120 175,000 (Q) I 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 1,150,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 1,1501006 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1,150,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Bay Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 26,414.81 1) 90 x 220 80.00 19o800.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 26,414.81 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 26,414.81 Short Legal COLUMBIA SUB REPLAT S 90FT OF LOTS i AND 2 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r--.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/8/2005 Pinellas County Property App Or Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 000 Property and Land Use Code descriptions . Buildi:ng...l._ . Building. 2 . Buildng_3_ . Ruilding.._4 Building #1 Page 3 of 8 08 / 29 / 15 / 17588 / 000 / 0010 :01 08-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:22:06 Commercial Card 01 of 4 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 229 CORONADO DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1iemsnts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 6 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,952 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Ar s a s Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 1,020 7) . 00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C?ammsrcial Extra Fsatur?s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 5000SF 1.50 51000 7,500 7,500 999 2) POOL IRRG 25,000.00 1 25,000 14,000 1,972 3) PATIO/DECK 500 3. 00 500 1,500 1,430 2,002 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 22,930 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/8/2005 Pinellas County Property App0r Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 04 Page 4 of 8 Building #2 08 / 29 / 15 / 17568 / 000 / 0010 :02 08-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:22:04 Commercial Card 02 of 4 Improvement Type: Hotel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural Elsmen?s Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 24 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,952 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arieas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 2,076 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 1,068 8) .00 0 3) Upper Stry Base Area . 90 2,316 9) . 00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 ?omm?rclal Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) SHED 6X12 5.00 72 360 140 1,952 2) . ao 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 140 Building #3 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/8/2005 Pinellas County Property App0r Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 04 Page 5 of 8 08 / 29 / 15 / 17508 / 000 / 0010 :03 08-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:22:11 Commercial Card 03 of 4 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel t 4 St Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 S?ruc?ural Elements Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 6 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,952 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 900 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 396 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Cc)mmE3 rcial Extra FeaTures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #4 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/8/2005 Pinellas County Property App, 0r Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 04 Page 6 of 8 08 / 29 / 15 / 17508 / 000 / 0010 :04 08-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:22:19 Commercial Card 04 of 4 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel < 4 St Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1em?n?s Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 36 Bath Tile Wall Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,955 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 2,500 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 1,200 8) .00 0 3) Upper Stry Base Area . 90 2,500 9) . 00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C omm c r c i a1 E x t r a F? at ur c s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F+_1 R Ffl ® Pq Pq http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/8/2005 Pinellas County Property Appoer Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 0? r 35 GUL VIIEN D DR N BLVD -- 41 DEVON CORONADO ?•q DR GUL ISIEW LJ BLVD , -r- 17,5 k 0 45 i- --?_ ? 'ORkR DC} Gl1LE'VIEW BLVD 225 -`--?? t??lRAD?7 r T .?0 I CORONADO DR ` R `-?-- -- _fl pNADO I 311 GULL FVIEW C BLVD 31 c CONADO 316 N DR t f -'? 31 CORDRAD ? ? CO%,N DO c -n Page 7 of 8 N 100 D CSR N 112 DR 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r--.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/8/2005 . Pinellas County Property Appr Information: 08 29 15 17568 000 00 Page 8 of 8 6 _ 4 3 glk ? eC"? ' ? ? xe ? 4 Back. to.._Search_Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/8/2005 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGSi?,-?* The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September 20, 2005, beginning at 10:00 a.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (reconsidered from 07/19/05) The City of Clearwater is requesting reconsideration of the attached sign approved through the Comprehensive Sign Program application contained within the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application that approved a problematic use for Amscot Financial in this location. [Proposed Use: Problematic Use (Amscot)] at 1874 North Highland Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 32.08. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-01004 2. Ardent International LLC., Panaviotis and Helen Vasiloudes (M3B Development LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade & 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lots 1 & 3 and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 3. Raim & Xheziie Tzekas [A Very Important Pet (AVID) Salon] are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow pet grooming and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store and to permit a 6-ft tall fence located in front of the building (approximately 5 ft back from the N Lincoln Ave frontage), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Pet Grooming/Outdoor Training Facility) at 1242 Cleveland St, Padgett's Estates Sub, Lot 3 and parts of Lots 2 & 4. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-06058 4. Harborside Condo LLC (Mark Newkirk) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (16 existing attached dwelling units; 15 attached dwelling units proposed, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 15 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 12.4 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.3 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 4.3 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.8 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 87.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.67 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.13. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 706 Bayway Blvd, Bel Crest Condo, Units 1-12 & 14-17. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07070 i 5. K&P Clearwater Estate II LLC (Mark International LLC, Sunrise on the Beach Inc) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 90 ft along Coronado Dr and Hamden Dr, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.5 ft (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 229 Coronado Dr, Columbia Sub Replat, parts of Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planners 1;n Well AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07061 p. 6. LOPA LLC (Patricia A. Bilotta & Lorri S. Ritter) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 3 attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 14 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to building) and a reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit (5 spaces) to 1.33 spaces per dwelling units (4 spaces), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-4041, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to zero ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 1254 Grove St, Property of AJ Moore, Lots 14 & 15. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05042 7. Coates I, Inc. is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 9 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 621 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay unit No 5 Replat, Blk 78, Lots 5 & 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07064 8. Jerry & Teresa Tas are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 20 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 18 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 14.94 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 14.88 (to building/pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 67.5 ft along Coronado Dr and to 71.64 ft along Hamden Dr as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C.. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 342 Hamden Dr, Columbia Sub No 2, Blk A, Lot 11 & part of Lot 10, and Columbia Sub No 3, Lot 7 & part of Lot 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07066 9. Hess Properties II LLC, and Bay Esplanade Properties LLC (Stephen T Hess) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (15 existing overnight • 0 accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 8 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) at 64 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 21 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 51.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 0 ft (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 64 & 566 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 79, Lots 3, 18 & 19 (less R/W for Clearwater St), and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07065 10. Seawake Motel Ltd (Enchantment, LLC) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 7 ft (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 15.7 ft ( to sidewalk) and from 20 ft to 14 ft (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 150 ft (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of 3 dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Dr, 4 dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Dr and 1 dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 691 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 16-19 & Rip Rts & land on S of Lot 19. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 11. Clearwater Grande Dev LLC (Steve J Page) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 6.3 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 17.6 ft (to open stairs) and from 20 ft to 8.8 ft (to pool deck), an increase to the building ht from 35 ft to 99.5 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 645-655 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07072 12. Canterbury Property Mgt Inc, TLS HoldinEs Inc, Dorothy C Boldog Tre, and Canterbury Oaks Inc are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Blvd) setback from 15 ft to 5.45 ft (to building), from 15 ft to zero ft (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth St.) setback from 15 ft to 3.63 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Dr) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 401, 411, & 421 S Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub Lots 72-77, 121-122, 124, 128-129 & parts of Lots 123 & 127. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07068 13. KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east)setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off- street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 and 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 14. Parkdale LLC (Belleair Harbor, LLC, Maria Nikolova) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 sq ft to 8,171 sq ft, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 ft to 60 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C, and preliminary plat approval for 2 lots. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (2 units)] at 475 East Shore Dr, Clearwater Beach Park ls` Add Replat Blk C, Lot 5 & Sub Land. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06056 15. Homeless Emergency Project is requesting Flexible Development application to permit the redevelopment and expansion of an existing residential shelter (including the expansion of the kitchen and dining area), in the Commercial District, to maintain the existing front, side and rear setbacks with the exception of a front (south) setback of 4 ft (to dumpster enclosure), and to permit off site parking, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of 0 0 Sec 2-704.C and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 18 units) at 1200 Betty Ln, Fair Burn Add Blk C, Lots 7- 9. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07063 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 09/04/05 FLD2005-07061, (48) AMERICANA GULF MOTELS LTD PTR BADERTSCHER, JAMES R 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD BADERTSCHER, DARLENE J CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 402 E MAIN ST LESPSIC OH 45856 - 1433 BOLDOG, CLARA BOLDOG, DOROTHY 2500 VIRGINIA AVE NW UNIT 1405 WASHINGTON DC 20037 - 1901 BRZEZNY,KRYSTYNA 1543 SANDY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - Clearwater Beach Association Jay Keyes 100 Devon Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 CUSTER, GERALD 2152 LONG BOW LN CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6414 GIOVANNI, ROBERT KOZIK, CHRISTIAN 852 NARCISSUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1131 HAMODI, AHMED A 116 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2438 KALLAS, DORA KALLAS, GEORGE 3405 GULF BLVD BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3644 LOMINC 4100 N 28TH TERR HOLLYWOOD FL 33020 - 1116 MILO INVESTMENTS LLC 1057 WYCLIFF LN AKRON OH 44313 - Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Doug Williams, President 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, FL 33761 DENELL, MARGARET M 94 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2436 GONATOS, OLYMPIA THE GONATOS, MICHAEL N THE 1460 GULF BLVD # 1004 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2848 K & P Clearwater Estate II LLC 5600 Mariner St, #227 Tampa, FL 33609 Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Mark International, LLC 1015 Eldorado Ave Clearwater, FL 33767 NIEMYJSKI, TADEUSZ NIEMYJSKI, MARGARET 35 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2437 !/" W BASKIN, H H EST OWENS, W D EST 516 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905 CHRISTMAN, KENNETH R SR CHRISTMAN, LINDA J 225 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 CLEARWATER SEASHELL RESORT 28059 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - GIBSON, EMMETT GIBSON, EVELYN L 2309 BRISTOL ST BRYAN TX 77802 - HAMMOND, TOM G HAMMOND, CAROLYN 130 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2438 K & P CLEARWATER ESTATE LLC 3105 W WATERS AVE STE 31 TAMPA FL 33614 - KEYES, JAY F THE KEYES, JANET D THE 100 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2438 MAZUR, JAN MAZUR, JANINA 216 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2446 NORMYLE, BERNADINE J LIVING TR 500 OSCEOLA AVE N # 203 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - E PANOS, STEVE S PAPPAS, TOM QUINN, PANOS, FILITSA PAPPAS, ANASTASIA 225 HAANNMDEN DR 109 DEVON DR 115 DEVON DR 225 HA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2439 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2439 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2497 R T V PROPERTIES INC ROGERS, ROLAND PO BOX 3835 321 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8835 CLEARWATER FL 33767 RUDMAN, MIRKO SEA CAPTAIN RUDMAN, ANKA 526 BELLE ISLE AVE 217 CORONADO DR BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3612 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 SHAH, JUGALKISHOR B SUNNY MOTEL LTD PTNSHP SHAH, MANNA J STE 100 326 HAMDEN DR N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 WAUKESHA WI 53188 - TRACEY, CHRISTINA M TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST 207 CORONADO DR 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - VENDITTO, CARLO M WANIO, TATIANA A VENDITTO, ENRICA M 14 GRENVIEW BLVD N 124 DEVON DR TORONTO, ONTARIO M08X 2K1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2438 00030- CANADA IPROSS, WILLIAM A III ROSS, DORIS H 125 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2439 SEACOVE PTNSHP 316 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 SUNRISE ON THE BEACH INC 229 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2431 VASILAROS, MARINA E TRUST 111 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 WELLER, HARRIETTE M 110 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2438 FLD2005-07063, (42) 1 .0 BAKER, GREGORY BARNES, ENOCH 16BENNETT, JASON BAKER, CHERYL R BARNES, RUBYE L 1015 N BETTY LN 1116 FAIRBURN AVE 1020 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3302 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3318 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3301 BIRT, ANNIE W BLUNT, ALICE BRADLEY, TERRY A 1009 N BETTY LN BLUNT, DERICK E BRADLEY, KAREN T CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3302 1201 FAIRBURN AVE 1010 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3321 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 BULLOCK, ELVENA CARPENTER, DONALD C CARTER, W MILES THE 1107 N BETTY LN CARPENTER, CONNIE J 1115 N BETTY LN 1008 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3304 CLEARWATER WATER FL FL 33 3755 - 3432 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3304 CLE Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition COOPER, WAYNE H DE BUSK, PEGGY A Doug Williams, President MAJOR-COOPER, CHERYL 1315 OVERLEA ST 2544 Frisco Drive 1020 FAIRBURN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3423 Clearwater, FL 33761 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3316 DILLARD, GEORGE DIMAS, WILLIAM C DOYLE, EVELYN M MOONEY, LUCRETIA A 1117 N BETTY LN 1325 LOTUS DR N 1525 STEVENSON DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3304 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5410 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2648 EVANS, CASTELLA E EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE INC FLOYD, THOMAS SR 1214 FAIRBURN AVE 1120 N BETTY LN FLOYD, ELIZABETH O CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3320 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 1471 FAIRMONT ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2753 GODWIN, JACQUELINE L HOMELESS EMERGENCY PROJECT KIRTLEY, JAMES L 1231 PALMETTO ST INC KIRTLEY, CAROL CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4334 1120 N BETTY LN 1018 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 Lafferty Architecture Group, LLC LUDEKER, CATHERINE MC ABEE, DAVID Stephen B. Lafferty, AIA 1016 PINEBROOK DR MC ABEE, PATRICIA 11414 Seminole Boulevard, Suite 5 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 1204 FAIRBURN AVE Largo, Florida 33778 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3320 PATELLA, RONALD PINELLAS BD OF PUB INST PINELLAS BD OF PUB INST PATELLA, ELIZABETH M PO BOX 2942 PO BOX 2942 1022 PINEBROOK DR LARGO FL 33779 - 2942 LARGO FL 33779 - 2942 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 POLLOCK, ALBERT EST PUGH, HENRIETTA W RICHARDSON, SHERI C 1021 FAIRBURN AVE 1208 FAIRBURN AVE JONES, ESSIE M CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3317 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3320 1124 FAIRBURN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3318 RICHEY, PAT F 1309 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3423 STAGG, JAMES E 3332 OLD COX RD CHASE CITY VA 23924 - SERGEANT ALLEN MOORE COMNTY?SGT ALLEN MOORE COMNTY PT PTNSHP 1201 N BETTY LN 1201 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3306 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3306 THOMAS, CALVIN E WATTS, BARBARA 1012 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 TINSLEY, JAMES S 1408 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2607 WHARRAN, WILLIAM WHEATON, JOANNE M WHITE, JENNIFER D WHARRAN, LYNN 4632 FRANKLIN AVE 1101 N BETTY LN 1014 PINEBROOK DR LOS ANGELES CA 90027 - 4202 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3304 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 f CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 September 30, 2005 Mr. Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-07061 - 229 Coronado Drive Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 90 feet along Coronado Drive and Hamden. Drive, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 53.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2- 803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That any future storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Should such storage units be proposed and approved by Staff as a Minor Revision to this approval, evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BII.1. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYM EMPLOYER I September 30, 2005 Zayac - Page 2 4. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 6. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; and 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.t-nyclearwater.com/gov/depts/plannin . *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S. (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished Applications lCoronado 0229 Sunrise Condos (T) - Approve&Coronado 229 Development Order.doc