Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2005-06058
Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 y„r" g Fax: 727-562-4865 ! SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ! SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE .$ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) L7 _z aC, ass CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: AVIP PET SALON 7/Pi/"GJ ?y?v/J7Yf? Op? MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER:727-459-4400 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: 0Tl MAILING ADDRESS:200 2ND AVENUE SOUTH, # 462, ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33701 PHONE NUMBER:7277 4-Sci y q 0 O .FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- r Cow . ?• r-n%jr var_U UCVtLUrmtNT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) .._SIREET_.ADD -ELAND STREET CL EARWATER LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE SURVEY . ?,,t gF? .. i-9-r i} --'- t % P ;- I (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 15/29/15/65268/000/0030 PARCEL SIZE: 20,889 SF 0.48 ACRES MOL I i i r r! -- rUnn. (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): EXISTING 3200 SF BUILDING TO BE CONVERTED INTO PET SALON '+ i i L/1' l v., +,tl? ?, ti L 3 I (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): _ 0 p yyt r {- r if C Attach sheets and be specific when identifying tKe req uest (included ereques a evra i sg. reduction?re bey oof parkingnspaces specificuse,, etc.) biMd 7- iA r ?? o S - / /I1?DDeR 7gnar?.. _ '? l.. X (,Ac, ) \ Page 1 of 7 - Flexile Development Corr g ensive I n fi 1 Application 2005- City of Clearwater , 1 ORIGINA Planning Department ;, 100 South Myrtle Avenue arwater, Florida 33756 CleClearwater Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ! SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ! SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE I 1 AV .5 NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) 0 CASE #: ¢-UD ate DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: AVIP PET SALON k V e,r ? $- 'M Pa r 4 0 A 6 9' e4;k-' MAILING ADDRESS: 1725 ALBEMARLE ROAD PHONE NUMBER:727-459-4400 PROPERTY OWNER(S): FAX NUMBER: (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: JAMES J. SHAW SHAW & ASSOCIATES MAILING ADDRESS:200 2ND AVENUE SOUTH, # 462, ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33701 PHONE NUMBER:727-821-8537 FAX NUMBER:727-898-8700 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: JSHAW@IDSFL.COM PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- S. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) t n C; O --- fiTaEFTADjD ( U _LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE SURVEY Q -- (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) FLI?IYN1NCi ... PARCEL NUMBER: 15/29/15/65268/000/0030 CIC??t n?{I~ r , PARCEL SIZE: 20,889 SF 0.48 ACRES MOL (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): EXISTING 3200 SF BUILDING TO BE CONVERTED INTO PET SALON (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS : CHANGE EXISTING RESTAURANT INTO PET SALON WITH OUTSIDE TRAINING, GROOMING SEE NEXT Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc. Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi I Application 2°" 5- City of Clearwater ? ORIGINAL /ANU Kt:uutb I J REQUESTED CODE DEVIATIONS: REQUEST THAT FACILITY BE ALLOWED TO CONSTRUCT A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH FENCE ALONG THE BACK OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ALONG LINCOLN AVENUE. THIS FENCE WILL ALLOW SAFETY OF THE PETS DURING OUTSIDE TRAINING. THE REQUESTED FENCE WILL PREVENT PETS FROM ENTERING THE ADJACENT ROADS AND PROPERTIES AS THE PERMITTED HEIGHT OF 42" CAN BE BREACHED O lE Lr U-11 1-1 - 12005 Jul o vt;b Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive In fi I Application 2005- City of Clearwater _ • 6RIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), APR documents) ' IOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) I SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) I Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1 The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. BOARDING, GROOMING DAY CARE, PET WALKING AND VETERINARIAN VISITS. SMALL OUTSIDE AGILITY EVENTS WILL TAKE PLACE AND TRANSPORTATION OF PETS AND DROP OFF WILL TAKE PLACE UNDER THE EXISTING CANOPY 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. NO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ARE ADJACENT TO THIS SITE AS THIS SITS ON A CORNER LOT. THE VACANT RESTAURANT WILL BE CONVERTED INTO A UNIQUE BUSINESS WHICH WILL ENHANCE THE ENTIRE AREA :3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. THERE WILL BE NO ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE HEALTH AND/OR SAFETY ON ANY PERSONS IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA AS ALL P _ WILL BE LEASHED OF CONTAINED WITHIN A SIX(6) FOOT FENCE. (SEE REQUEST FOR CODE DEVIATION SECTION .4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. THE PET SALON WILL REDUCE THE TRAFFIC AS THE ITE TRIP GENERATION TABLES INDICATE A REDUCTION IN TRAFFIC FROM THE _ RESTAURANT. THE RETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING ARE 10 SPACES LESS THAN RESTAURANT REQUIREMENTS 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. I HE HE I SALON WILL PROVIDE PET CARE AND TRAINING GIVING THE COMMUNITY A HIGH QUALITY FACILITY. THIS UNIQUE SALO IS NOT AVAILABLE WITHIN THE CITY. THIS FACILITY WILL BE A PET SHELTER DURING STORM EVACUATION EVENTS. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. AS THE PET SERVICES WILL EITHER TAKE PLACE WITHIN THE FACILITY OF WITHIN A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH FENCE ENCLOSURE Tt _ W!LL BE NO ADVERSE AND/OR VISUAL EFFECT ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. THE FACILITY WILL ACCEPT PETS DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS OF 6AM TO 7PM, 7 DAYS PER WEEK. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1 The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity k; and development standards. "' ?•?.? moor- 11-4 n r«01MUMAN I Uat ANU I HtKtFUKt THIS REQUEST I A SALON WITH GROOMING, CARE AND RETAIL PET PRODUCTS. THE FENCE DEVIATION IS EX FORM LEI E 1' s U Page 3 of 7-Flexible Development Comprehensive 1 n fi 1 Application 2005- City of fe + & EV&1DPM-N1 1;%,Cb ? FARWATEA 0 QR161NAL The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) AS THE RESTAURANT SITE IS VACANT AND THE PARKING NEEDING REPAIR THE PET SALON PROJECT WILL E14HANCE THE SITE AND PROVIDE LANDSCAPING. HAVING THE SITE OPERATIONAL WILL INCREASE THE VALUE OF THIS FACILITY AS WELL AS ADJACENT PROPERTIES. EXISTING VALUE $650,000. PROPOSED APPRAISED VALUE &725,000. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. PET CARE FACILITIES ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE CITY 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. ADJACENT USES ARE COMMERCIAL AND RIGHT OF WAY. THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE NO ADVERSE EFFECT. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. A SEARCH WAS CONDUCTED FOR A SIMILAR FACILITY HOWEVER, OTHER BUILDINGS WITH THE LAND THAT IS REQUIRED FOR TRAINING WS EITHER NOT AVAILABLE OR LOCATED IN AN AREA THE WOULD NOT BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE REQUESTED USE. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. THE EXISTING FACILITY IS A VACANT RESTAURANT WITH DETERIORATING PAVING AND VERY LITTLE LANDSCAPING. THE PROPOSED FACILITY WILL ENHANCE THE PARCEL AND BRING A VISIBLE SITE INTO AN ATTRACTIVE, NECESSARY BUSINESS 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY WILL BENEFIT FROM THE DEVELOPMENT OF A THRIVING BUSINESS ON A SITE THAT IS CURRENTLY VACANT. THIS SALON WILL BE THE FIRST PET CENTER IN CLEARWATER. OTHERS EXIST IN DIFFERENT CITIES AND STATES. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ALL REQUIRED SETBACKS AND PARKING ARE MET FOR THE SITE. THE PARKING SPACES ARE BEING REDUCED FROM 24 FOR THE RESTAURANT TO 12 FOR THE SALON PER THE CITY CODE Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. THERE WILL BE NO ON-STREET PARKING Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi I Application 2"05- City of i6RIGINAL 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. THIS FACILITY HAS BEEN VACANT FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND THE SITE HAS BECOME SOMEWHAT UNATTRACTIVE DUE TO THE VACANCY. WHILE THE BUILDING ITSELF IS ATTRACTIVE, THE SITE REQUIRES LANDSCAPING AND RE-PAVING. THE SITE WILL BE BROUGHT INTO LANDSCAPING COMPLIANCE AND WILL BECOME A UNIQUE NEW BUSINESS IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. THE BUSINESS WILL HIRE LOCAL STUDENTS, ACCEPT VOLUNTEERS, GROOM PETS TO BE ADOPTED BY EXISTING ANIMAL ORGANIZATIONS, ORGANIZE STUDENT DAY TRIPS AND PROVIDE A SHELTER DURING EVACUATION EVENTS. JU 0 91005 CtTY0F Ct EARWAKA Page 5 of 7- Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi I Application 2015- City of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. I At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ! Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ! SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ! TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; 1 PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the Parking standards (ie Reduce number of spaces) Prior to the submittal of this aPPlication the methodology of such study shal be a"Proved by the Community Development Coordinator and shat be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering Principles The findings of the study w i 1 be used in determining whether or not deviations to the Parking standards are aPProved; ! GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ! PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ! COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ! SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date p Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and spe trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; ,? L!? I M ?Uy JU 0 120 Veto Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi 1 Application 2005- City of Clearwater Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and ORIGINAL Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; v Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ! REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) and color rendering if possible; FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Cffsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; W_ Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; "delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; _ interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ! REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) (color rendering if possible); ! ?IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ! COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 01 r', u; o a .-Vcl?b Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive 1 n fi 1 Application 2005- City of Clearwater • 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ! BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ! REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/3 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ! All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ! Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). •. Reduced signage proposal (8 %X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ! Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: a e Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ! Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): i i Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs 40AUTION ach turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. raffic Impact Study is not required. - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND E HAS S BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and auth ze City representatives o visit and photograph the property d ribed in this applicatio i Si tr rrts of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this A.D. 20 to me and/or by , who is personally produced as identification. Notary public, 11, D My commission expires: - day of known has U 0,120 Page 8 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive 1 n fi I Application 205- City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (11we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Commission Expires: Notary Public My S: (Planning DepartmentlApplication Forms ldevelopment reviewlflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc Page 9 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi I Application 2005- City of Clearwater -09/17/2001 14:48 7275624755 ENG PAGE 01/01 C7 ORIGINAL ? PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 100 S- Bo Myrtle Ave., #220, 33756-5520 ??????? PO x 748, Clearwater, FL 337584748 v Phone: (727)562 3750, Fax: (727)5624755 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT IN LIEU OF R.ETENxZON NAME OF SIT LOCATION: PREPARED B' DATE: 09114/01 OWNER'S NAMO: RADI TZEKA.S PHONE- - ADDRESS: 1242 CT..r VILMD STREI T CONTRACTOR/ REPRESENTATrvE (if any): JAMES SEL&V PHONE: (727) 821°8537 FI- (727) 821-85 3 ADDRESS: 218 'at AVXNM AORTA- ST PRTERSBMW, Fr 337n t REASON FOR REQUEST: NO gT0 MWATRg ATTRN"3: ON OR TRRATMtxtNT pg(MjD13D to be completed by ,(', fY? (t?.sing national farnrulo dQ= dCIA) A= TOTAL AREA, OF SITE (Divide s .f. by 43.S60) ........................................ .01 (ACRE) C-Cpre"Cpost (Weighted Runoff Coefficient After Development)---------------- -.475 Cpre = ((.95 x existing impervious area) + (.20 x pervious area)) / total area -m+95 Cpost = ((.475 x existing impervious ama)+ + (-20 x pervious area)) /total area --475 I;-- 3.6 (based on 60 min. T_O-C.) JQ- ACIA .017 cts. CITY OF CLEAAWATER VOL. REQUIRED (AQ x 3600) ......................... 61.2 c.f. (Minimum, SWFWMD first U2" or A/24) ........................................................... = 18.75 c.f. VOLUME PROVIDED .......................................................................•---- 01 TOTAL VOL. TO BE COMPENSATED BY P.I.L.O. (volume required by City - vol. provided) ............................................. = 61-2 c.f. P.I.L.O. AREA total volume / 3R. (assumed pond depth) .......................... = 20 A s.f. ESTIMATED LAND VALUE (125% of tax assessed value) .......................... = $ 7.44 per s.f. TOTAL AMOUNT DUE (P.I.L.O. area s estimated land value) ................... = $ 151-84 *use .95 for /load prone area Section 32.347 of the code of Ordinances of the City allows developers to make payment in the farm of fee-in-lieu-of charges and wave certain construction requirements. The owner understands and agrees that the Payment in Bleu of Retention must be made prior to the issuance of a Building Permit and the City reserves the right to use ,subject funds for construction of City stormwater facilities as designated by the City Manager, Owner or Owner's Representative S: lWorallemplateWayment in Lieu of Retention_doc revi3ed:10114198 Date C (lug . r i s 0 12005 ?rr.vt f f f f LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 29, 2005 Ms. Jaycee Roth A Very Important Pet 330 Duncan Loop East Building 27, #102 Dunedin, FL 34698 ?ITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 RE: Development Order regarding case FLD2005-06058 at 1242 Cleveland Street (A Very Important Pet). Dear Ms. Roth: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to allow animal grooming, and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store. The request includes a six-foot tall fence to be located in front of the building approximately five feet back from the North Lincoln Avenue frontage, per Sections 2-903.C. The DRC recommended APPROVAL of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The development proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.C; 2. The development proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The development proposal is in compliance with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the East Gateway character district; 4. The development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. The development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Condition for Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 2. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That the boarding of animals be prohibited; BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR Hoyt, f-LAmILTON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. Pr'fERSEN, COUNCILME.MBCR "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" September 29, 2005 FLS2005-06045 - Page 2 3. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That a final landscape plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; and 5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and attached signs be limited to canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by September 29, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact John Schodtler, Planner I at (727) 562-4547 or via e-mail at john.schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael nelk; AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished Applications lCleveland 1242 -A Very Important Pet (D) - ApprovedlFLD2005- 06058 DEVELOPMENT ORDER.doc '/ a -16 is 00 M y < LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 29, 2005 Ms. Jaycee Roth A Very Important Pet 330 Duncan Loop East Building 27, #102 Dunedin, FL 34698 CITY DE CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 RE: Development Order regarding case FLD2005-06058 at 1242 Cleveland Street (A Very Important Pet). Dear Ms. Roth: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to allow animal grooming, and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store. The request includes a six-foot tall fence to be located in front of the building approximately five feet back from the North Lincoln Avenue frontage, per Sections 2-903.C. The DRC recommended APPROVAL of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The development proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.C; 2. The development proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The development proposal is in compliance with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the East Gateway character district; 4. The development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. The development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Condition for Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 2. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That the boarding of animals be prohibited; BRIAN I. AUNGtiI', NN/IAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYC HADIILTON, COUNCIL:MEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILME11ABER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMBIBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRIv,-rivE ACCION EMPLOYER" September 29, 2005 FLS2005-06045 - Page 2 3. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That a final landscape plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; and 5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and attached signs be limited to canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by September 29, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact John Schodtler, Planner I at (727) 562-4547 or via e-mail at john.schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk; AICP ' Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmenAC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished Applications lCleveland 1242 -A Very Important Pet (D) - ApprovedIFLD2005- 06058 DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc --, ? ?.?i 1 ? 11• t LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 29, 2005 Ms. Jaycee Roth A Very Important Pet 330 Duncan Loop East Building 27, #102 Dunedin, FL 34698 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 RE: Development Order regarding case FLD2005-06058 at 1242 Cleveland Street (A Very Important Pet). Dear Ms. Roth: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to allow animal grooming, and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store. The request includes a six-foot tall fence to be located in front of the building approximately five feet back from the North Lincoln Avenue frontage, per Sections 2-903.C. The DRC recommended APPROVAL of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The development proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.C; 2. The development proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The development proposal is in compliance with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the East Gateway character district; 4. The development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. The development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Condition for Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 2. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That the boarding of animals be prohibited; BRLAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR Hoy-T HAMILTON, COUNCIUMENIBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMENIBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRNIATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" September 29, 2005 FLS2005-06045 - Page 2 3. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That a final landscape plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; and 5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and attached signs be limited to canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by September 29, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact John Schodtler, Planner I at (727) 562-4547 or via e-mail at john.schodtler(aDmyclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmenAC D BIFLEX (FLD)W?active or Finished Applications lCleveland 1242 - A Very Important Pet (D) - ApprovedlFLD2005- 06058 DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doe C ITT OF C LEARWA T E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ I I- t4 POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ••+-'? Itt MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, loo SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 29, 2005 Ms. Jaycee Roth A Very Important Pet 330 Duncan Loop East Building 27, # 102 Dunedin, FL 34698 RE: Development Order regarding case FLD2005-06058 at 1242 Cleveland Street (A Very Important Pet). Dear Ms. Roth: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to allow animal grooming, and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store. The request includes a six-foot tall fence to be located in front of the building approximately five feet back from the North Lincoln Avenue frontage, per Sections 2-903.C. The DRC recommended APPROVAL of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The development proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.C; 2. The development proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The development proposal is in compliance with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the East Gateway character district; 4. The development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. The development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Condition for Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 2. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That the boarding of animals be prohibited; BRIAN I. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HoYIr HA.\IIL'I'ON, COUNCIL\IGJtHGR BILL JONSON, COUNCIL\'IE\1BER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCIL MBIBER "EQUAL FNIPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" -1 '1 September 29, 2005 FLS2005-06045 - Page 2 3. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That a final landscape plan be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; and 5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and attached signs be limited to canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by September 29, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact John Schodtler, Planner I at (727) 562-4547 or via e-mail at john.schodtler(a?myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael l5elk; AICP"1 Planning Director S: (Planning DepartnientlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications I Cleveland 1342 - A Very Important Pet (D) - ApprovedWLD2005- 06058 DEVELOPMENT ORDER.doc ..: ? >,.: ?' ? LQ WlEnw P KupgnubQmu PIE4 SCALE 314 " =1" PROPOSED HEIGHT 020HAd N 5- Mb 0110 CO., 09C. pa 902 9,244W coaL+ La, 6, 7 2g.-w?o 90 ?-092-?qv -0002) 1PA2 q-0192-Iygv =2)51)© THIS ORIGNAL, UNPUBLISHED DRAWING DESIGNED BY GDSCI IS NOT TOBE USED, COPIED, REPRODUCED, OR EKBIBIFED IN ANY FASHION W fIN OUT W RITTEN CONSENT AND WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO BE COMPENSATED FOR ANY WORK DONE PRIOR TO MANUFACTURING F012, Aftl,04a Page 1 of 1 Beth From: Jeff Gibbens [Jeff@generaldesignsign.com] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 12:47 PM To: Beth Subject: Re: sign stuff Attachments: VIP BLDG..jpg; VIP.jpg Thanks for the logo. This is a rough draft of what your signs will look like. The monument sign is out of scale for a 2'x5' if we could use a 3'x4' it would match the logo better. The prices are our wholesale prices. If you go back to our website at www,generaldesignsign.com and take a look at the specs of what we build.All signs are warranted against breakage INCLUDING vandalism. That's a big deal when it comes to monument signs. These type signs take a lot more abuse then any other. The individual letters are "Injected Molded, pad mount letters. These are top of the line for un-lighted Ietters.The letters are only available in either 6" or 8" Your cost for 6" is $7.90 each or 17x$7.90=$134.30 for 8" it's 17412.70=$215.90. The monument sign lighted is $950.00 and $500.00 for the pole and pole skirt. If you have someone who could do brick or some other base that would look good then I would forget about the pole cover. 1 am pretty sure 1 have an open box of the changeable letters that you can have for free. they are new but it is an open box.Once you have had a chance to look this over, call me at 1-800-800-2193 and I can explain in detail. Enthusiastically, Jeff ---- Original Message ----- From: Beth To: 'Jeff Gibbens' Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 10:54 AM Subject: RE: sign stuff Jeff, As requested, please see the attached. Beth From: Jeff Gibbens [mailto:jeff@generaldesignsign.com] Sena: Monday, October 03, 2005 11:40 AM To: beth_@averyimportantpet.com Subject: sign stuff Beth, It was nice to speak with you this morning. Please attach your logo to this e-mail and I will sent designs and prices back to you. Thanks, Jeff 10/3/2005 Quantity Common.Name(s Botanical Name OClricatlons 0 W I ? I.. d1 2 0 N lh 20 Hibiscus Hibiscus Rosa-sinensis 3 Gallon 2 Daisy Coreopsis Verticillata 1 Gallon 12 Snake Plant, Mother-in-Law's Tongue Sansevieria Tri sciata Prain 1 - 3 Gallon 4 Queen Palm, Cocos lumosa Syagrus romanzoffiana 10' Clear Trunk 30 Big Blue, Super Green Lidope 1 Gallon 18 Leadwort, Plumbago, SkyFlower Plumbago Auriclata 3 Gallon 30 Boxwood Buxus Microph lla 3 Gallon 2 Oak Trees 10' Overall height - 2.5" caliper. Florida Grade 1 All Areas Around Plants to be mulched wit h Cedar Mulch PC M 4"x 4- V4- E. CORN EFL LOT 1 R.N. P4D 6£T`n'S Su 601VISIDN ALSO /', ? lE, BEING THE s.E" d ! 1 } CORNEt?FLOT 24, P U V 'G.,n? THI RO=SE OF A"J. MODRE,P43. 12, I?EI PG. 24. A^I ?'= S1C? tL. S I'.I d W F?FZCsle") 8 a F- /C 0.4 NORTH (DENT) Z r F 1 R 1. G' EAST F/C O. lo' NORT14 ?., 2. Uj 3. S 5968 1.9 E 209.0' CP) CLF ?09.15'(F) 0.40' WEST FIR Ld 4. SOO°28.05" E ? - c,AS ?• '' (008C()) N15°5933"E 40 {3 (F - _ A59hAt4 • Lyres' aMETEF? % n _ LL- lL S1RC QO.O Cg RC CS/B") II ACCESS SEE S W p WEST 40 FT. Ej P 0 N01-M TE - 2 OF LOT 4 N 2 C/O t-1.0 1. . Q Q U c z?.?' ? Q REMOVE ASPAAL.1 v 26 1' z Q. Su -J i IIJSTAI_L. SoA 0 l ONE STORY ° ?Ra1tiS 0 3: 61 E 1 6. -b 4' Jn. MASONRY ,L OLDS. CDR. ? z r 0.5' CLEAR 4': J '9 i`,t vs c- JI-0 ,p ILL, 1 F6nlt6I,?1545. 4.6 ?i$ b'WHITE PV< 1 WHITE PVG NttuBS < ??: _. i I :. ONE STORY - 2 3 4 S Tz 9, 10 II 1 MASONRY n, ? 41.2 <- ,, 0 sl l A ,/,/ / ?\` J 1 \ ?pt(aa>:;O+f],? ?+' RAN \\?' •??\ \?\ \'\` • u -4 W to COVERED t ENTRANCE L?rjppt t(? ?. M E/P I, o 1 ?IuM{?Q?l \ N 24 I?alm OII LOT 3 a Q ?° 7 :7- ?r pll 3. F'K N it D C u?M O r U1 AO sr_ ;7 COrj. LOT 7 , FND. x•cur z :. t??u. Q /.??.. _. --- ---- •r Q ?fJtiT iv V r ? cost. OF 151-1<. COl L3ROKEN BLDG. COR-. ._. .. yY ... U "- .. 13411 CPaI: O.G' CLEAF( •.? i? GN _ Ltvidr ??1 I rJ S• o /G/i J i iJ? i v • ! ?WW, U `S 9O°OO?00 E 203.07'(F coNC. s/W cJ 070C)'00" .E 169,00 CF) C/5 4•^L. P. FrP r0 . ci 203.0' CPS r° t?CN4d W-M ?.s ^ 30 E/p Sr! (Lu Q!S ..rsrr. :'CONC. STORM isCL+5 ?QS C. Ci. 2, CURIES l% GUTT$S?OLL GG'e _ G.1. vt jvi IOU 0 '04 VIA to . I , 0"'t ?U"[ 9 Schodtler, John From: Nick Fri [natbeach@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 6:44 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: Re: 1242 Cleveland John, Thanks. I doubt barking dogs at 6am will be welcomed by the neighbors. Nick ----- Original Message ----- From: John. Schodtler(a myClearwater.com To: natbeachptampabay.rr.com Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 1:23 PM Subject: RE: 1242 Cleveland ONick, Thank you for your correspondence regarding this case. 0 Page 1 of 1 The earliest that pets would be allowed outside would be 6:00 am when the business opens, although the training would probably not start until after 8:00 am. The outdoor fenced area is to be utilized as a training area where the handlers and the pets together will be trained. This is not to say that a pet or its owner could or would not get disorderly and attempt to make an escape. However, staff has asked several fencing contractors if this type of fencing would be durable enough to withstand such an occurrence and they indicated that it would. Thank you, John Schodtler -----Original Message----- From: Nick Fri [mailto:natbeach@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:54 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: 1242 Cleveland I noted the hour that dogs will be inside is 7:30pm. What is the earliest time allowed outside? Driving around the city last year, following storms of 60mph (force,) a significant number of PVC fences failed and scattered, Will a PVC fence be durable enough for a 40 to 60+ pound (force) "disobedient" dog to run and hit against it head on when people are walking past on the sidewalk? Thanks, Nick 9/16/2005 ONick, Thank you for your correspondence regarding this case. The earliest that pets would be allowed outside would be 6:00 am when the business opens, although the training would probably not start until after 8:00 am. The outdoor fenced area is to be utilized as a training area where the handlers and the pets together will be trained. This is not to say that a pet or its owner could or would not get disorderly and attempt to make an escape. However, staff has asked several fencing contractors if this type of fencing would be durable enough to withstand such an occurrence and they indicated that it would. Thank you, John Schodtler -----Original Message----- From: Nick Fri [mailto:natbeach@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:54 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: 1242 Cleveland I noted the hour that dogs will be inside is 7:30pm. What is the earliest time allowed outside? Driving around the city last year, following storms of 60mph (force,) a significant number of PVC fences failed and scattered. Will a PVC fence be durable enough for a 40 to 60+ pound (force) "disobedient" dog to run and hit against it head on when people are walking past on the sidewalk? Thanks, Nick From: Jaycee Roth Daycee5552002@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 1:23 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: Re: VIP... John, It was a pleasure seeing you today. In response to your inquiry, the answers are noted below: 1. The training would begin no earlier than 8:00 a.m., handlers will remain with the dog(s) at all times. 2. Dogs would be walked, beginning at 6:30 a.m. in a confined area that is fenced and away from the public. Handlers will remain with the dog(s) at all times. 3. The fence must meet all standards for hurricane and installation standards, and the posts will be cemented in place. Please feel free to contact me with any additional questions. Regards, Jaycee John.Schodtler &myClearwater.com wrote: John, Again, I want to thank you for everything you have done for the dog business and me. You have really gone over and beyond anything I could have ever expected from the City of Clearwater. I want you to know I will never forget how great you have been and how much time and energy you have spent. Thank you! Jaycee John.Schodtler*myClearwatencom wrote: That is not a problem, I drew the fence following the property line where the little tail point out to the left. Jaycee, I have a citizen inquiring about your case. Could you email me back the answers to the following questions? 1. What time would be the earliest that an outdoor training session would begin? 2. What time would be the earliest that an outdoor potty break would occur? 9/15/2005 j 0 0 Page 2 of 2 3. Do you think the PVC fence will be strong enough to stop a disobedient pet barn. running up against it and causing the fence to collapse, subsequently allowing an escape? Yahoo! for Good lick here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. 9/15/2005 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Schodtler, John From: Nick Fri [natbeach@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:54 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: 1242 Cleveland I noted the hour that dogs will be inside is 7:30pm. What is the earliest time allowed outside? Driving around the city last year, following storms of 60mph (force,) a significant number of PVC fences failed and scattered. Will a PVC fence be durable enough for a 40 to 60+ pound (force) "disobedient" dog to run and hit against it head on when people are walking past on the sidewalk? Thanks, Nick 9/15/2005 40. f3s?ra a 0 . f 1 €ON W Ise ' SB9 Mfs'E - 209.00"?- j - !- • ....•- - BEN <' S?1?b. p+INV jkNKs . ? ? . ? . ?e p(A??p 1 2 N B9 5g:U W VOOb'. ,CONixUOW ANdO - /eo •-??? ?. I '? ('(? ? . 6. o I' LL. LI' ' - J? * y?. .. 1? 6 4r'eem??5 Daq 5.on...!N5 I \ P , v o t C54fl SS taREf# easRro Rrr RlxP 4 n _ 5$7 mrrixmwrbuaw ? RAIM I J rw?rpoti opso AtGo- a. Cq% ,h h FVIP '"QDIwy -1) . o . - od<, w51r S?nys. r ? W. •? 2 17A{ sTgr¢ prEA „ ''? '40" LOT 4 - ' .14 ` Lo' 12 u as A ^ U FrO,J ??OPM ` Ih V o E? ?'>.E .?? ? • pu0FI?875ui 6 - I'. ? -- C ! g . IT: [??J t \ Ano snC.19c.P -` \? ti. N IN, - -... V . pAN 01eNEET Ap1A. Ti wR " lu tllEp{'PA1M I , a., 13 l? I i to (. N 90 d0'00' N' `- i 4s..00,.. . ? -oo CONSTRUCT 5 CONCRETE SIDEWALK may ax ALL LANDSCAPING AND OTHER.STRUCTURES TO EE'MAINTAWED a 76^ MAX. HEIGHT .M71HIN SIGHT TPJANGLES. ? 6R0$CAPE PLAN 9CAEE r • sa-0' CL EVELAAD STREET '. Anr acexs v.KVxssrAac r R lnFvFl nPFR. BITE PLAN aar?a,Prb revWr.T ,rc sceurz I Aterv Ka<oARmxsav>xa+xR n,wPa a. A?A ?bpAr A(/Kf11,E.RP1iK O'IAV(AP 1pI1rX ACR.1{ N MI[YRW}B? CAA.MExL ' 1DxeIRW AVAtim dxVO/ ,De'A.4 .TINS R / RMNxT - . G?pomrn{9 ARQA 55d s1 ?'< &-MiL RUA?300 {'?? c.1.cN.: AREA 4 S9. • $Q??.?l??q P?r2A000 s? ?• ?pW?'1 OF ,pstsirnotr I. Or.p OFP .'•?? trw?1' doaR 610011th ? ?s.k'vp ti?t fruit R?oe?ewsP?9t••P,M'? 3 p« Oor.4 1NSEo 8y i:SO P. PLANT MATERIAL LIST m - camaN RAre IIOTAIGLL xue' aPeaeArioxe UVE OAK "Rps yw4mANA C or. X ,V CNPER - .,Wm PAIN . IYAGM ROIINROIMIIA XI V7 CAP91 X 20 S0. So CVT N. - 4eI{61W1 L.MIICRI 2P Of X NO' $PG. a QI Wll MlAr VAOWAM+PRTO ?TFTC G" TOORA tiAPFRATA' 2eW.. X eC MD D NACON How= ... I Ne*= ROIAdeeIIR .. .D fiALLd1 - ' pmM A m RM.RI Dgl TAIO r I! NT. X 0C M0. s OALLQN Alree wee IeYiPaPe YAMS"T .gARP a NT. X e 5M.4 K UANi WxOPe' 1PARE tvPRUFex rxN1T' w NT, x N' .'0, I.RNWM. e00 eT A GWiMe D1?WTAIXM OCgHOA. Ee4MR. ORAEVRIe CWWAM, ALL AMA" MWM nM" TO m'MLCHM W" CyeR eds M4CN " PLANT LEGEND uve oAK ,hr???\ .0 seat PAMI /?/y, s?Arueim /!?/// auxr « ' ?e?e (•A PAMOM AWG {? AeTec GNANe . ;N uun ullwE R'w N11 OATS SHEET: REVtSIpNS SHAW & ASMS . - - FNCjfZBRIlYC DWXg k CONSULTAWS 218 SI AMM NDRIN ISs,AD fdtboNVRUCDON -wwwnxx0- GT, ST. ?, 9/1 s/ot LS -1 N O . noel 09.wgPo CASE .. 'DESG w. BY ?Dmrc M ? ft" Ode ? ORIGINAL X53 ? ? nom.-? iwAi Case: •+ Address:. SRC: CDB: Yes No I I N/A 1 I. SITE DESIGN ORIGINAL l? r r rX r F 17 l r r Fi l tl? 1 Appropriate • Retention of the existing street grid pattern where it contributes to an active pedestrian environment. • Blocks which promote easy pedestrian access and encourage cross-use. • Redevelopments that reopen previously vacated rights--of-way or create new rights-of-way. • Provision of new vehicular and pedestrian access/circulation that effectively serves the proposed development and vicinity if a vacation of a right-of-way is requested. • Lots which maintain a consistent size, scale, pattern and rhythm of the surrounding block(s). Inappropriate: 0 17 • Vacating existing rights-of-way to form consolidated blocks without providing alternative pedestrian and vehicular access to serve the proposed development and vicinity. F lr. • Large blocks which prohibit pedestrian access through the block and/or prohibit access within and around the development. 2. Pedestrian Circulation/Access r Appropriate: ld C • Clearly defined, safe, direct, convenient and landscaped pedestrian pathways provided between streets, parking areas and buildings. I- Pedestrian scaled lighting such as lighted bollards; '` I • Vertical elements such as bollards, markers, arches or architectural details. 1 • Alleys and courtyards that match or complement either the building or the primary street to which the alley connects with regard to materials, architecture, color and street furniture. (waste receptacles, benches, lighting, etc.). 7 • Specialized paving design especially where pedestrian and vehicular paths intersect. 17 • Pedestrian passageways which go through buildings such as an arcade. r Inappropriate: 1° • Developments which do not include direct access from urrrunding streets and parking areas. D r1 1 `?l i III 1 1 2031 5 PU'., Case: DRC: CDB: Yes Addr • No N/A 'r- O Large developments which do not provide pedestrian walkways through the block on which the development is r r r r r.- r_ r l r l pe /I IrII1- l rv? r 2 r I I r.. located. o Pedestrian passageways too narrow to be useable or not designed at a human scale. o Pedestrian passageways that create an unsafe environment. B. Access, Circulation and Parking: 1. Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parkin Appropriate: o The location, number and design of driveways which maintain the urban fabric of the downtown. o Vehicular access from secondary street frontage or alley. o Interior lot access limited to the minimum number of curb cuts to adequately serve the site. o Parking areas for townhouse developments located within the interior of the development that maintains the integrity of the primary facade as the preferred design. For townhouse projects located on low traffic-volume streets with site characteristics that prevent internal parking, parking may be directly accessed from the street provided it is co-located with shared driveways. o Detached garages and carports serving single-family uses located in line with or behind the rear of the principal building. o Residential uses along Clearwater Harbor designed with parking garages or with parking areas internal to the site/ building and screened from Clearwater Harbor and any abutting right-of-way. a Attached garages in residential developments, architecturally integrated with the design of the principal structure. o Driveways functionally integrated into the design of the development. o Joint/common access driveways between sites. o Shared parking where a mix of uses creates staggered peak periods of parking demand. o Parking lots located behind the primary fagade of the principal building. o Parking lot design that minimizes negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views. o Parking lots adjacent to rights-of-way that are screened with either a landscaped buffer or a solid wall or fence three feet in height. v6A'q? 00/r" Case: DRC: CDB: •• Address: 00 ORIGINAL Yes No N/A r7'1 17 F7 . Large parking lots visually and functionally segmented into smaller lots with landscaped islands and canopy. r7. • The use of interlocking pavers, brick or other similarly textured materials for parking lot surfacing and/or accents. M 1 1 • Parking garages as the principal uses that are architecturally integrated with surrounding developments and/or the envisioned character of the area. F7' J7 f • Parking garages as the principal use within the Downtown Core located on Cleveland Street, Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues with at least 75 percent of the ground floor of each facade on all adjacent street frontages occupied by active uses. Active uses include restaurant, retail, entertainment or other uses/features determined to be pedestrian-oriented. t? f r__J • Parking garages accessory to a principal use that are architecturally integrated with the design, materials, finish and color of the principal structure(s) on the lot. Li • Ground floors of parking garages accessory to a principal use with at least 75 percent of the primary facade occupied by the principal use/features or other use determined to be complementary to the principal use. • Upper floors of all parking garages designed to visually screen vehicles from view from rights-of-way and public open spaces. Screening includes landscaping, walls, architectural elements or other decorative features. __ T-7 J...:.i • Parking garages with clearly marked points of ingress and egress. C 17 Inappropriate: r C" • Curb cuts at every site. T u,, li • Parking lots or garages as the most prominent feature of any development. l- r r • Parking garages difficult to enter and/or with poorly defined ? entrances. " " 1 Cl L from the rights-of-way. sea of asphalt • The appearance of a 17 1 • Parking lots/garages which create an unsafe environment. 2 33 3 Case: 1 CDB CDB L • A Yes II No II N/A Addr*• C. Site Elements: 1. Open Space r r Appropriate: r? r r o Open spaces which function as transitions between the public sidewalks and streets and the use of the property (residences, offices, stores, etc.). 1? r r O Clearly defined entrances into open spaces with direct access from adjacent streets and adequate buffering from vehicular traffic. rr--' r r Y Open spaces that are visible and inviting to the pedestrian. r r r} o Open spaces which utilize an aesthetically coordinated marriage between hardscape (buildings, planters, lighting, walls, fences, paving, etc.) and landscape (trees, shrubs, annuals, perennials, etc.) elements. r f G Large open spaces broken into smaller, human-scale spaces through the use of changes of grade, planters, pots, landscaping, sculpture, fences, walls, etc. r C O Open spaces designed to relate and connect to adjacent properties. rL- r r C Formal or informal seating appropriate to the scale and function of the open space. Seating may include park benches, the tops of garden/planter walls, monumental stairs, etc. r-f r r o The location of public art in accessible open spaces designed and located so as to enrich the pedestrian experience and create a stronger sense of place. r r r Inappropriate: r r r G Open spaces not easily accessible from public streets or that become unsafe "dead" spots _ r 1" o Lack of seating, shade and clearly defined perimeters. l 1W C G Open space that does not relate with the uses and buildings surrounding it. 4 N/A F ??? dress: C, Sri ?.,? rl t 1 1 ZC'3 i ORIGINAL a. Mechanical Equipment, Concealed Wireless Communication Facilities, Loadinp_ and Service Areas. 1 1 r7 171, 1 l- 1; lr 17 1 1 Appropriate: • When located at grade, mechanical and utility equipment that is placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way with fences, walls and/or landscaping. • When located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment that is integrated into the design of the building through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. • Concealed wireless communication facilities (antennas, satellite dishes, etc.) attached to buildings and not visible from any public right-of-way. Appropriate concealing methods include painting the facility to match the color of the building, concealing the facility by an architecturally-integrated features, suLh as_the. use of faux windows, dormers, chimneys, parapets,. etc. or other similar methods. • Service and loading areas accessed from secondary streets, screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way and placed in visually unobtrusive locations. • Solid waste containers placed in the most unobtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of- way. Inappropriate: • Solid waste containers and service and loading areas located adjacent to residentially used lots when an alternative location is feasible. • Mechanical and utility equipment that visually dominates a site. • Freestanding wireless communication facilities. b. Landscaping Appropriate: • Landscaping compatible with the climatic conditions of West Central Florida that includes the use of native plant species and Xeriscape landscape techniques. • Plant species that are appropriate to the space in which they will occupy with regard to water needs, growth rates, size, etc. in order to conserve water, reduce maintenance and promote plant health. 5 Case: DRC: CDB: I . I -, z ft Addre0• • Landscape design which augments and supports architectural features of the building/site where located. • Landscape design that visually screens unsightly views, aesthetically supports important vistas and reinforces the character district in which it is located. • Plantings in landscape beds, planters or pots that soften the edges between buildings and pedestrian areas. • Trees planted in paved areas provided with adequate room to grow (landscape beds, tree grates or other protective techniques). • Landscape design and maintenance that engenders a sense of personal safety. 6 Inappropriate: • Landscaping used in lieu of appropriate architectural details and good building design. • Landscaping planted without an adequate irrigation system. • The use of non-hardy plant species. • Use of the wrong plant in the wrong space such as plantings with inadequate room to grow and/or plantings inappropriate for an active pedestrian area, etc. • Landscaping allowed to become overgrown decreasing aesthetics and safety. c. Fences and Walls Appropriate: • Fences and walls that complement and are consistent with the principal structure with regard to materials, texture, size, shape and color. • The location, height and design of fences and walls compatible with the intended use, design of the site and architecture of the building. • Solid fences and walls along rights-of-way no higher than three feet. Any portion of a fence or wall above three feet in height that is at least 50 percent open. • Posts or columns that include decorative caps which extend up to 12 inches above the otherwise allowable fence height. • Vertical elements such as posts, columns, etc. incorporated into the design of the fence or wall spaced at appropriate intervals in relation to the materials used and overall length. Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No 17 c -r r r r-_ <r 1---' F7 l F` 17 F F 1"' F N/A ri r7 1! 1i r! rii C r 1 l 1 W Address: 00 ORIGINAL • Property lines and private areas defined through the use of fences where feasible. Inappropriate: • The portion of walls and/or fences along a right-of-way greater than three feet in height above grade that are more than fifty percent solid. • Chain link or barbed wire fences. • Unpainted or unfinished walls and fences. II. BUILDING PLACEMENT A. Location: B. Orientation: C. Separation: D. Coverage: Appropriate: • Buildings that maintain the build-to line or the setback of the development's block and the block(s) across the street. Corner lots that maintain the location pattern for a distance of two blocks including both sides of the street. • Buildings located farther from the build-to line that provide a courtyard, steps, entryway, arcade, plaza or other pedestrian- oriented design features which maintains the build-to line. • Buildings with reduced setbacks that reflect the predominant surrounding or desired development pattern. • Buildings oriented to face public rights-of-way. • Separation between buildings that provide adequate useable space such as an alley or open space compliant with the requirements of these Guidelines. • Developments which provide coverage similar to surrounding properties and/or that meet the desired vision of the character district. Inappropriate: • Buildings that break up the common build-to line by locating farther back or forward than the predominant block patterns on the subject's site and the opposite side of the street. • Corner lots that do not maintain the location pattern for a distance of two blocks including both sides of the street. FD i T,-, tin 1 1 1 2w Case: DRC: CDB: ' Yes No N/A r r r r r r r r rv" r r 1 1"'' r r r r r\.A ?L r r r r ?'' r r r r 8 AddreAhAk o Buildings separated at a distance which precludes the provision of Guideline-compliant alleys and open space. o Separations between buildings that are out of scale and proportion with the district's existing or desired development pattern o Buildings which do not address the primary street. E. Additional Requirements for Character Districts and Special Areas Transition Areas Appropriate: o Buildings 30 feet or less in height that are setback a minimum of 10 feet from the Plan Area boundary. o Buildings taller than 30 feet in height that provide a setback of a minimum of 10 feet plus an additional one foot for each two feet of height above 30 feet. III. BUILDING DESIGN A. Form: 1. Mass/Scale: a. Heipht• b. Width: c. Depth: d. Rhythm/Spacinz Appropriate: o Building form which visually relates to surrounding buildings and the desired character of the area with regard to mass, scale, height, width and depth. o Buildings that have a distinct "base," "middle" and "cap." o Low-rise buildings and/or those with long facade widths that accentuate vertical elements such as entrances and columns, or by breaking up the facade plane into a greater number of smaller vertical masses. o Mid- and high-rise buildings that utilize horizontal elements that minimize the apparent height of a building such as balconies, banding, cornice and parapet lines, etc. o High-rise buildings that use one or more of the following depending on overall building height and the existing or desired character of the surrounding area. 09 Address: 00 9 N/A r . 17 C f 71 C fr T7 lrr lrr f? T 171 l7l, 1.° ORIGINAL ? The width of the upper portions of buildings reduced to minimize the overall building mass (reducing the size of the floor plate). ? Building stories or/stepbacks differentiated by architectural features including but not limited to coping, balustrades, cornice lines, change in materials, etc. ? Stepbacks used as the building increases in height. • Buildings that terminate views emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. • Maintaining a consistent building depth when feasible to allow the location of shared parking lots and/or secondary entrances. • Buildings which correspond to the existing and/or desired rhythm and spacing of surrounding buildings through the use of common points of agreement such as windows, doors, recesses, reliefs and other architectural elements. • Buildings which maintain the existing and/or desired pattern of the placement and size of windows, doors, shutters, and other architectural elements on adjacent buildings with regard to both the ground floor and upper stories. • Finished floor heights a minimum of two feet above the sidewalk grade for residential buildings within predominantly mixed use or commercial areas. Inappropriate: • Buildings which do not relate to the surrounding or desired and envisioned context and fabric of the neighborhood with regard to size, scale, height, width and depth. • Buildings that visually overpower adjacent buildings. • Buildings that do not maintain a common building depth based on the predominant lot pattern. • Buildings that do not maintain the existing and/or desired pattern of windows and doors along a block face. • Facades on multi-story structures which do not incorporate meaningful architectural details such as cornice lines, banding, string courses, columns, recesses, relief, etc. MIS 1 4 NS5 ? ? ? s# Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No IV r r l r? r l r r-?' 1 l r r r r 10 N/A I? 1- F7 l-` 1 17, 1 1 17 1- r] l E 1 Addre 3. Additional Requirements for Downtown Core along Cleveland Street Appropriate: o Buildings along Cleveland Street taller than the predominant height of other buildings on the project's block that stepback at that predominant height. o Additional stepbacks used the more the building exceeds the predominant height. Inappropriate: o Building widths that visually overpower adjacent buildings. B. Architecture: Appropriate: O New development that incorporates an architectural style or architectural elements consistent with the existing and/or desired style of development in the surrounding neighborhood. o New development that complements the architectural heritage of the district in which they are located. o Multiple buildings within a single project which relate architecturally with each other and the surrounding neighborhood. Inappropriate: o Use of an architectural style which does not complement the fabric of the surrounding neighborhood. o Use of multiple and/or conflicting architectural styles within a single building or between several buildings within a single proj ect. Fagade Design: a. Primary and Corner Facades Appropriate: C The primary facades as the most highly designed fagade utilizing the following elements: ? A change in plane, building wall projection or recess; ? Architectural details; ? Variety in color, material, texture; ? Doors and/or windows; ? Storefront display windows for retail uses; and ? Other details as appropriate to the building style. ' Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No f 17 l r?= N/A 1"" 1! r 7 r- 1l f 17. 17 F_r I I C' 3 l 1`", f" rI 11 Address: 00 ORIGINAL • An architecturally prominent entrance with door located on the primary facade. • Primary entrances emphasized through the use of a combination of: ? A protruding front gable or stoop; ? Projection or recession in the building footprint ? Variation in building height; ? Canopy or portico; ? Raised cornice or parapet over door; ? Arches; ? Columns; ? Ornamental and structural architectural details other than cornices over or on the sides of the building; ? Towers; and ? Other treatment that emphasizes the primary entrance. • Primary facade, in keeping with established patterns, which include three articulated architectural parts: a base, middle and cap. The proportion of these three elements will vary depending on the scale of the building. • Major architectural treatments on the principal building facade that are continued around all sides of the building that are visible from the public realm. • Covered drop-off areas. • Open porches. • Buildings on corner lots that emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. • Entrances provided along each street facade or a single entrance prominently located on the corner. Inappropriate: • Facades without articulation or other architectural detail to provide visual interest and variety on the facade. • Primary facades with an undefined entrance. • Entrances not architecturally integrated into the design of the facade. • Buildings on corners that do not treat each adjacent designated street equally. • An unfinished facade along a street. f A US 1 1 2U JJ ? f` 1 PLAN- N'' ; F)7 r,r Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No r F r r r r .r r r r r r --r r r r r r r r r l? r r' r r l r r€ r 12 N/A Addre b. Secondary Facades F Appropriate: r o An overall design of the secondary facades of the building consistent with that of the primary facade with regard to architectural style, materials, finish, color and detail. F o Architectural embellishments, awnings, landscaping and signs used to identify the secondary entrance. r o Entrances facing parking lots, plazas and waterfronts. r Inappropriate: r o Buildings that do not provide an entrance along a secondary facade. r o A secondary facade which does not enhance or support the architectural style of the building. c. Side Facades r Appropriate: r o An overall design of the side facades of the building consistent with that of the primary facade with regard to architectural style, materials, finish, color and detail. F o Architectural embellishments, awnings, landscaping and signs used to identify secondary entrances if provided. r7 Inappropriate: r o A side facade which does not enhance or support the architectural style of the building. d. Windows and Doors f Appropriate*: F, o Windows that are appropriately sized for the scale and style of the building on which they are located. l o Windows along all streets. r o Windows within a building/development that creates a consistent and cohesive fenestration pattern. r o Windows that are similar in proportion to windows on adjacent buildings or with established and/or desired patterns along the adjoining block faces. The degree of similarity of the window pattern increases in importance the closer the buildings are to each other. r o Windows in commercial areas that are appropriately sized and located to allow for display and/or view into the interior of the building. Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No N/A r, 1 rn r7' r7 177 f-- T f 17 WW ? 1 r- l- r 1l ? f7 r--- r-7 PrIl 1 13 N Address: so ORIGINAL • Bulkheads below and transoms above display windows when appropriate for the architectural style of the building. • Clear glass (88 percent light transmission or the maximum permitted by any applicable Building Codes) installed on ground floor windows except for stained or art glass provided the stained or art glass is in character with the style of the building (churches, craftsman buildings, etc.). • Glass block used as an accent. • Screen doors provided the design is compatible with the architecture and materials of the building. •. Doors which enhance and support the architectural style of the building. • Doors appropriately sized for the scale of the building fagade on which they are located. • Doors with transoms and fan lights when appropriate for the architectural style of the building. *Utility/Infrastructure and Public Facilities are exempted from the requirements of windows and doors below and are fully addressed in the Signs and Miscellaneous section of these Guidelines. Inappropriate: • The use of incompatible window types and shapes on the same structure. • Mirrored glass and glass curtain walls. • Storefront windows that extend to the ground without a traditional bulkhead. • Tinted or reflective glass with less than 88 percent light transmission. • Blackened out windows or any other use of material that achieves that effect. • Boarded up windows (except during construction or during a reasonable repair period or subsequent to a weather advisory). • Walls without windows along street frontages. • Doors which are out of scale and/or character with the rest of the building. • Doors which do not enhance the architectural style of the building. • More than one style of door per building. :i tj r1 'tom nrw. a KAMM,- Ch ._...arYCA:(;LLL;? .. ..; Case: DRC: CDB: Addre Yes No N/A e. Roof Desilln 1W" )- Appropriate: 1 O A roof consistent with the style of the building utilizing architectural elements such as cornice treatments, roof overhangs with brackets, steeped parapets, richly textured / - materials and/or differently colored materials. th t h ildi l l b l v r r ngs u a e p arge s on O Multiple rooftops on varying leve break up the vertical mass of a building. O High-rise buildings which utilize sculpted roofs in order to establish an interesting and enhanced skyline unique to Downtown Clearwater. r 1- O Roof shapes consistent with the existing and/or desired r character of the surrounding area. f i h d d f ll k h b P 1 . f j in e an u y s at are ac s t o The portions of building step complement the architectural style of the building and the main roof structure. r r F Inappropriate: r F r] o Colored stripesibands on flat roofs. o Mansard roofs. r G Flat roofs within public view from grade not hidden by a ' parapet or other architectural feature. 1-` o Roofs inconsistent with the architectural style of the building. L Other Architectural Features r r7 f-,' Appropriate: ` i o Shutters and canvas awnings sized to match the corresponding window openings. 1 o Shutters and awnings the shapes, materials, proportions, design, color, lettering and hardware of which are in character z' with the style of the building. t f t d b i d d/ t li fi h r r ar an a r c an a re re-ra e ty qua o Awnings made of hig minimum of five feet in depth to protect pedestrians from inclement weather. r`W r o First floor awnings placed no higher than the midpoint between the top of the first story window and the bottom of the second story windowsill. _., r C Hurricane shutters, if provided, fitted as an integral part of the storefront design, not visible when not in use and only to be used during the timeframe in which a formally issued hurricane 14 Case: ? Address: DRC: CDB: Yes No N/A warning is in effect. ORIGINAL r; r- r • Electronic security systems utilized as an alternative to security bars. • Fire stairs/egress designed as unobtrusive as possible by matching the primary structure with regard to materials, design and color of the structure. Where feasible, they should not be visible from the street. • Devices which discourage the congregation of animals (pigeons, squirrels, etc.) placed in the least visually obtrusive locations possible and/or designed to blend in with the overall architectural style of the building. r • The inclusion of other architectural details and elements (clocks, railings, flower boxes, etc.) as appropriate to the style and function of the building and architecturally integrated with the design of the building. r . Gutters, downspouts, utility boxes, meters, etc. located as visually unobtrusively as possible. Where feasible, they should not be visible from the street. r r7l' Inappropriate: TW" r r • Visible, permanent or roll-down security bars/gates. r 177 • Solar collectors visible from the street. r r' • Awnings made of high-gloss or fabrics which appear to be plastic. F 17 • Backlit awnings. 2. Materials and Color: a. Materials Appropriate: • Materials compatible with the existing and/or desired context of the surrounding area and that are common to the area's historic construction methods/style. r • Buildings that are built as high-quality, long-term components to the urban fabric constructed as maintenance free as possible . r 1-7, • Building materials consistent with and relating to the architectural style of the building. ?" • Building materials appropriate to the scale of the building. f • The use of contemporary materials adapted to historic design elements. r i ?f PZ 11 15 tip.°3 Lti?J !1 ? Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No r r l 1- r r r V 1 N/A f_. r- 1- 1-a r r Addre o Storefront level and upper levels that use visually compatible materials. o Use of the following durable materials within the first three floors of all buildings and recommended for all other floors: ? Wood, stucco and/or or masonry exteriors. ? Masonry exteriors finished in rusticated block.. ? Stucco, brick, stone, etc. ? Storefront side piers, when provided, constructed of the same material as the upper fagade or covered with stucco. ? Pre-cast cast-in-place or architectural concrete . ? Tile and ? Any other material found acceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. Inappropriate: o Exterior walls and skins of buildings designed and/or constructed of materials with a limited life expectancy. o Materials incompatible with the architectural style of the building. o The use of the following materials_ on building exteriors: ? Poorly crafted or "rustic" woodworking and finishing techniques; ? Cedar shakes; ? Plywood (T1-11 siding, etc.); ? Corrugated, mill finish or reflective metal wall panels; ? Expanded metal (except for limited decorative applications); ? Mill finish aluminum extrusions for windows and doorways; ? Unfinished Concrete Masonry Units (CMU or cinder block); and ? Any other material found unacceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. o The use of the following materials on the first three floors of building exteriors: ? Foam except for architectural details and ornamentation ; ? Exterior insulated finish system (EIFS) except for architectural details and ornamentation ; ? Hardboard siding; ? Plastic, metal and or vinyl siding except for single-family 16 Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No N/A F'tlli) -r .11 r 17/ r' l r r l r f- l f 1 f-' F- r r 17 Address: 69 ORIGINAL dwellings ; ? Fiberglass panels; ? Exposed aggregate (rough finish) concrete wall panels; ? Indoor-outdoor carpeting or astro-turf; and ? Any other material found unacceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. b. Color Appropriate: • The number and type of building colors appropriate for and consistent with the architectural style. • Low reflectance exterior colors. • Gutters, downspouts, utility boxes, meters, etc. painted as part of the overall color scheme. Inappropriate: • Colors that are garish, gaudy, loud, excessive and ostentatious or that constitute a glaring and unattractive contrast to surrounding buildings. • Main body color that is from the deepest tones of the color wheel. • More than three different colors or color shades used on a single building unless appropriate to the architectural style of the building. • The use of fluorescent or day glow colors. • Black as the predominant exterior building color. • Single color schemes. For example using one color on every surface. • Clashing trim colors that are not complementary to the main body color and serve only to attract attention through their dissonance. As an example, yellow and red are clashing colors and not complementary and only serve to attract attention through their dissonance. • A solid line or band of color or group of stripes used in lieu of architectural detail. • Color used to obscure important architectural features. 3. Additional Requirements for development within the Old Bay District east of Garden Avenue. Appropriate: • Offices that are residential in size, scale and design. ra ° i ? /? ,,..... YV{I 9J WSJ PLpMM''NiN13 &?DEV'E?..Ut- Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No 1- r r r r r r r AV r F N/A r r Addreft 4. Development along Cleveland Street _between Myrtle. and Osceola Avenues and along Fort Harrison Avenue between Drew and Chestnut Streets. Appropriate: o Development incorporating an architectural style indicative of those found in Downtown Clearwater between 1900 and 1950* and includes: ? 20`x' Century Commercial Vernacular: One-story or One- Part; ? 20th Century Commercial Vernacular: Two-Part; ? Art Deco; ? Art Moderne; ? Chicago School; ? Mediterranean or Mission Influence; ? Mediterranean Revival; ? Neo-Classical; ? Temple Front. *See Appendix A Architectural Styles for additional details. Buildings which utilize character defining features from any one of the annroved architectural styles listed above through the use of contemporary materials. r Inappropriate: r a Use of multiple and/or conflicting architectural styles within a single building or between several buildings within a single project. V SIGNS AND MISCELLANEOUS A. Signs: r Appropriate: r C Signs on a building and/or site designed as part of an overall theme that respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building. r O Signs whose design, colors, materials, size, shape and methods of illumination reinforce the overall design of the fagade. r G Letter size, letter and word spacing, font style and other design elements of a sign that create an overall high quality aesthetic appearance. r C Attached signs proportional to the space to which they are attached. r o Attached signs installed so the method of installation is 18 Case: ? Address: : CDB DRC DB : ORIGINAL Yes No N/A concealed or made an integral part of the design of the sign. l T` • Where individual buildings are located with limited side yard setbacks, attached signs that demonstrate a general alignment with the signs on adjacent storefronts/buildings; r • Wall signs located on flat, unadorned parts of a facade such as the horizontal band between the storefront and second floor or on windows, awning flaps, fascia, etc. F: f • Wall signs located immediately adjacent to secondary entraces. 1`" . • Projecting signs located adjacent to the building entrances or tenant space(s) which they serve. _,, w` r • Hanging signs positioned perpendicular to the facade of the building and located adjacent to the building entrances or tenant space(s) which they serve. m r r7 • Awning signs which are permanently affixed (sewn to or screened on) to the valance of the awning as part of the overall awning design. r • Window signs consisting of paint or decals, etchings/ engravings, neon and/or three-dimensional lighted signs. r • Buildings with multiple tenants accessed from the interior of the building which include a directory sign immediately adjacent to that entrance. -- r r J • Existing, historic signs that are preserved or restored. F r" • Historically accurate reproduced signage documented by physical, documentary and/or pictorial evidence. F l • Changeable copy which matches the sign to which it is attached with regard to style, size and color. r Inappropriate: • Box/cabinet style signs. 1711 r r7 • Signs utilizing LED or any other electronic changeable copy. -- r 1- 0 Signs painted directly on the fagade of a building unless documented by physical/historical, documentary and/or pictorial evidence. _. r • Attached signs that cover windows or other architectural features. F r7l • Projecting signs higher than the top of second story windows. r r • More than one hanging or projecting sign per business. 1 ` • Awning signs which are affixed to the awning material by adhesive backed-letters or other non-permanent methods. r r' • Window signs which are affixed by tape or other non- permanent methods. - ??--? 19 f? JJ ^wrJ .J ??i1/J ? 1 J Case: Addre DRC: CDB: o Monument signs on sites where the primary building is located within 15 feet of a front property line. (Note: distance subject to final determination of setback/build-to line of the various character districts.) o Changeable copy area greater than 25 percent of the sign area (with the exception of theater marquees). o Sandwich board signs. B. Lighting: Appropriate: o Light fixtures that are designed to respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building. o Light fixtures that reinforce the overall composition of the fagade with regard to color, material, size, scale and shape. o Light poles located adjacent to a public right-of-way that incorporates the same or similar design of light poles as in the character district or complements the design of the building. o Attached light fixtures flush mounted on a wall or soffit. o Light fixtures that are recessed in ceilings or otherwise concealed. o Lighting located in bollards. o Existing, historic light fixtures preserved in place whenever feasible. o Historically accurate reproduced lighting fixtures documented by physical, documentary and/or pictorial evidence. o Lighting which illuminates without glare. o Utility meters, service locations, wires, piping, boxes, conduits, etc. placed in the most visually unobtrusive location possible. o Electrical wiring to all site lighting provided underground. o Accent lighting illuminating signage, landscaping and trees, water amenities and other special features. o An adequate number of light fixtures installed to effectively and safely illuminate pedestrian areas. Inappropriate: o Exposed spot and floodlight fixtures used on non-residential properties. o Light fixtures placed in a position where existing or future tree canopy will reduce the illumination levels or otherwise interfere with the light fixture. 20 Case: DRC: CDB: Fy-es l No N/A r r r r l f 1 1 f7, r7 r C r7 r7 r l f` 1` 1 1 i r7 1 r" _J r. _ _ 1 11 11 r.- 1 11i r7 r 1 In n r, 1c f7 ?' 7 1` 1 _ 1 21 Address: 40 ORIGINAL • Lighting which illuminates adjacent properties. • Light fixtures that do not relate to the structure/site with regard to materials, color, size, scale and style. • Lighting which is too bright, glaring and overpowering for a space or that is too dim to effectively illuminate. • Neon used to light a building or as a decorative element except where appropriate to the architectural style of the building. • Lighting which results in color distortions within pedestrian and vehicular areas. C. Property Maintenance: Appropriate: • Regular visual inspections of all portions of a building such as the foundation, walls, weather-striping, roofs, etc. • Regular maintenance and repair using quality materials. • Enlisting the services of professionals. • Using the gentlest possible procedures for cleaning. • Consulting a structural engineer prior to commencing any work when structural systems are affected. • Stabilizing/repairing deteriorated or inadequate foundations as soon as physically possible. • Replacing weather-stripping as needed prior to failure. • Replacing loose or missing roof tiles/shingles as soon as damage is observed. • Regular exterior painting and touch-ups as needed. • Inspection and replacing of awnings that show signs of wear, tear, fading, etc. • Regular cleaning and sweeping or. adjacent public property. • Keeping windows clean. Inappropriate: • Allowing routine maintenance and repairs to lapse. • The use of harsh chemicals/procedures for cleaning. • Failing to test a cleaning/restoration product/technique on a discreet location first. • Sandblasting and other harsh methods of cleaning that would damage or otherwise compromise the building. • Poorly attached elements that may fall and injure people •. Applying paint to fabric awnings. 1 D Fri, PLki1 3' T"'T - _.-i..a'lCS? Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No 1- f- F l r r r l CLIO, l" r 1- r r 22 N/A 1-: F 1 1 1 1 1 r r r Addre D. Pinellas Trail Appropriate: o Providing safe, convenient pedestrian connections between the site and the Pinellas Trail. o Providing amenities such as seating and/or bike racks. Inappropriate: O Properties located adjacent to the Pinellas Trail that do not acknowledge it through the use of connecting pedestrian paths, doors, windows, art, etc. E. Utility/Infrastructure Facilities Appropriate: o Utility/Infrastructure facilities which visually relate to surrounding buildings and the desired character of the area with regard to mass, scale, height, width and depth consistent with the New Construction chapter of these guidelines. o Utility/Infrastructure facilities that incorporate an architectural style or architectural elements consistent with the existing and/ or desired style of development in the surrounding neighborhood consistent with the New Construction chapter of these guidelines. o Utility/Infrastructure facilities that maintain the existing and/or desired window pattern and proportions through the use of windows or window-like architectural details (faux windows, recesses, glass block, tile, shutters, trompe Poeil or other architectural techniques) and/or other architectural elements. o The use of awnings, canopies and sunscreens. a Doors that enhance and support the architectural style of the building and are appropriately sized for the scale of the building facade. Inappropriate: o Utility/Infrastructure facilities which do not relate to the surrounding or desired and envisioned context and fabric of the neighborhood with regard to size, scale, height, width and depth. o Facades on Utility/Infrastructure facilities that do not incorporate meaningful architectural details such as cornice lines, banding, string courses, columns, recesses, relief, etc. o Walls without windows or window-like architectural details along street frontages or parking areas. Case: DRC : CDB: Yes No N/A ?? r r 1 - r r7 1 r II 1 11 1 17 1 3 1 1 1 f71 17 17 17 F r r r 23 so Address: 0 ORIGINAL • The use of conflicting window types or window-like architectural details on the same structure. • Reflective glass and/or glass curtain walls. • Blackened out/painted windows. • Boarded up windows (except during construction or during a reasonable repair period or subsequent to a weather advisory). • Doors which are out of scale and/or character with the rest of the building. • Doors which do not enhance the architectural style of the building. • More than one style of door per building. F. Corporate Design Appropriate: • Buildings which meet all the requirements of these Guidelines as outlined in New Construction, Rehabilitation of Designated Historic Structures and this chapter, as applicable. • Corporate design which visually relates to surrounding buildings and the desired character of the area with regard to mass, scale, height, width and depth consistent with the New Construction chapter of these guidelines. • Corporate design that incorporates an architectural style or architectural elements consistent with the existing and/or desired style of development in the surrounding neighborhood consistent with the New Construction chapter of these guidelines. Inappropriate: • Buildings which house corporate franchises or businesses which do not relate to the existing and/or desired character of the surrounding neighborhood with regard to mass, scale, height. width and death and/or are otherwise inconsistent with the New Construction chapter of these guidelines. FLD2005-06058, (148) A Very Important Pet Jaycee Roth 330 Duncan Loop Building 27, #207 Dunedin, FL 34698 ANDEREGG, EARL E 7067 70TH ST N PINELLAS PARK FL 33755 - AUSTIN, THEA THE AUSTIN FAMILY TRUST 4639 MOUNTAINGATE DR ROCKLIN CA 95765 - BARRON, RICHARD B PO BOX 1661 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - BERA, WALTER BERA, GENOWEFA 4756 7TH ST NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MN 55421 - 2221 BIERITZ, RICHARD BIERITZ, ALICE 1221 DREW ST # C7 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4926 BRANCATI, ALEXANDER BRANCATI, VICTORIA 166-14 CROSS ISL PKWY WHITESTONE NY 11357 - BURKHART, JANICE 1221 DREW ST # A22 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4996 CASTLEMAN, KENNETH R CASTLEMAN, ELIZABETH M 404 N SHADOWBEND FRIENDSWOOD TX 77546 - 3839 CENTER, JERRY H CENTER, JAMES H 2040 NE COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2699 ADAMS, MICHAEL J THE ADAMS, PAMELA G THE 15 N MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4830 ANZELMO., VINCENZO ANZELMO, ANTONIA 2 CALABRIA CT WOODRIDGE ON L4H 1G5 00030 - CANADA BAIDOO, PETER 116 JEFFERSON AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4949 BAUERMANN, ELIZABETH L 1321 N SATURN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3666 BERTSCHE, EUGENE BERTSCHE, MARY 1221 DREW ST # C-12 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4926 BLANSKE, BERNARD BLANSKE, RITA L 1221 DREW ST # C11 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4926 BRANIGAN, NANCY JO 959 EAST 13TH SQ VERO BEACH FL 32960 - CALDERON, MELCHOR 1221 DREW ST # A14 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4915 CASTREJON, LETICIA CASTREJON, LORENZO 101 S AURORA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3519 CHADDER, JOHN P CHADDER, MARY E BLENHEIM STUDIO LEWES RD FOREST ROW SUSSEX RH18 5EZ 00003 GREAT BRITAIN -Ij1v5 *AMS, MICHAEL J THE ADAMS, PAMELA G THE 15 N MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4830 ATANASOV, MILAN ATANASOV, MIRA 1361 VILLAGE VIEW RD RR#1 BRESLAV ON NOB 1 MO 00030 - CANADA BANKS, DAVID BANKS, ALISON 19 ST JOHNS RD EAST GRINSTEAD WEST SUSSEX RH193LG 00003- GREAT BRITAIN BAUMGARDNER, WILLIAM D 1221 DREW ST # E6 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4928 BIANCO, PATRICIA L 1237 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - BOGDANOV, DUSAN STANULOVA, ZORICA PO BOX 43 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - BULA, RICHARD W 1221 DREW ST # E4 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4904 CAMPAGNARO,ERNESTO CAMPAGNARO, NATALINA 3232 APRIL LN PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1642 CENTER FAMILY LTD 2040 NE COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2614 CHAPLIN, PAUL D 1210 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4940 16 CHEN, SU-HUI Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition CLEVELAND PLAZA LTD CHEN, CHIAO Doug Williams, President 1213 CLEVELAND ST 1221 DREW ST # 3-C 2544 Frisco Drive CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4908 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4921 Clearwater, FL 33761 COLAIANNI, BARBARA M 1649 WILLOW WAY WOODSTOCK GA 30188 - 4649 COOK, DAVID J COOK, BETTY L 347 E THIRD AVE MOUNT DORA FL 32757 - 5654 CVETKOVSKI, BORIS 2250 ZENIA DR TROY MI 48083 - 6130 DESROCHERS, GESTION M INC 285 DE VI MY APP 406 ST BRUNO DE MONTARVILLE PQ J3V 6J5 00030 CANADA DONZE, RENE SEESTR 26 6375 BECUENRIED 00008 - SWITZERLAND DREW RIDGE CO-OP ASSN INC 1221 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4904 FERGUSON, DAVID B 1221 DREW ST # A9 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4929 FREEMAN, JERILY K 8927 ANGOFF DR NEW PRT RCHY FL 33771 COLLINS, CHERIE 1241 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4945 CORREA, MOISES JR CORREA, SONIA 1 1225 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4943 CYR, ROSE MARIE 12407 GREENLEE WAY RIVERVIEW FL 33569 - 6838 DICKSON, PATRICK H DICKSON, LOIS M 990 9TH AVE NW NEW BRIGHTON MN 55113 - COOK, DAVID J COOK, BETTY L 347 E THIRD AVE MOUNT DORA FL 32757 - 5654 COWAN, WALLACE F 1221 DREW ST # 5-13 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4925 DE VILLARREAL, ANA MARINA GELL NARANJOS 13 LOMAS DE SAN ANTON CUERNAVACA MORELOS 62020 00000- MEXICO DIONISOTIS, JIM 1221 DREW ST # 22B CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4997 DOUBLE D INVESTMENTS DRECIC, ZAVISA 125 9TH ST DRECIC, MALGORZATA BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3222 1221 DREW ST # D2 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4922 DUNN, E M DUNN, JEAN F PO BOX 13095 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 3095 FAYOCAVITZ, WALTER 2828 ROCK DR CLARKS SUMMIT PA 18411 - 9646 FIELD, DEREK B PERKINS, ANTHONY 31 MILL WAY E GRINSTEAD SUSSEX RH194DD 00003- GREAT BRITAIN GARBER, DONALD R GARBER,MARYCE -1309 1234 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4942 FRANCE, JOHN V FRANCE, ELIZABETH A 1629 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6102 GARRETT RICHMOND INC THE 1274 SEMINOLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4348 GIFFORD, GORDON III GIOL, JUAN GIOVAGNOLI, BEATRICE L GIFFORD, AMY J GIOL, MILAGROS 1221 DREW ST # C14 110 BETTY LN N 1221 DREW ST # D 13 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4926 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4903 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4927 1 0 GONCALVES, ALFREDO GONZALEZ, HEBER *IESHABER,GARY GONCALVES, MARIA GONZALEZ, DOLORES GRIESHABER, SHARON 437 80TH AVE 1725 ROBINHOOD LN RR 1 BOX 14 ST PETE BEACH FL 33706 - CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6449 FALLS PA 18615 - GTE FLORIDA INC PO BOX 152206 IRVING TX 75015 - 2206 HANDA, NARINDER KATARIA, ROMESH 1296 MOUMOUTH DR BURLINGTON ON L7P 3J6 00030 - CANADA HAUGEN, JANETTE HAUGEN, BRETT 1347 HIBISCUS ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3406 HELLER, DANIEL M 14 N MARS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - INTEGRIDENT PRECISION DENTALE 18 N JEFFERSON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4947 KAKAR,ABDUL KAKAR, FARISHTA 4414 MAYFLOWER DR MISSISSAUGA ON L5R 188 00030 - CANADA KELLY, RON 5-6476 HUGGINS ST NIAGRA FALLS L2J 1G9 00030 - CANADA LA MANNA, JOE LA MANNA, LENA 42 HEWLETT CRESCENT MARKHAM ON L3P 7J8 00030 - CANADA HOLTFRETER, JONATHAN M HAMADY, SUSAN 467 PINE BRAE DR ANN ARBOR MI 48105 - 2743 JADE GROUP 830 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - KAUCHER, FREDERICK W III 1451 HIGHWAY 90 W HOLT FL 32564 - 9301 KINCAID, ROBERT C KINCAID, JOYCE E 470B MULBERRY ST # 6 LEITCHFIELD KY 42754 - 2200 LA SALA, GERALD J 34 CEDAR ST BUTLER NJ 07405 - 1329 LEWIS, NORMAN A LOMAX, ERIC B THE 103 DUNNINGS RD E GRINSTEAD LOMAX, OLGA M THE WEST SUSSEX RH194AQ 00009 - 1221 DREW ST # E7 UNITED KINGDOM CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4928 MNEKINC 1274 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - MNEKINC 2076 SUNSET POINT RD APT 147 CLEARWATER FL 34683 - 2608 INSURANCE CENTER REALTY INC 5201 PARK BLVD PINELLAS PARK FL 33781 - 3418 JONES, AVIS C 103 N JEFFERSON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4950 KAZNOWSKI, ROMAN KAZNOWSKI, ALEKSANDRA 1221 DREW ST # B14 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4939 KOUSARI, ATTA O 1009 PEARCE DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1110 LAWLER, R C INC PO BOX 7792 ST PETERSBURG FL 33734 - 7792 LYDA, ELEANORE F 147 BIRCHWOOD PASS CANTON GA 30114 - 7754 MNEKINC 2447 ISLANDER CT PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - MC KENZIE, PATRICIA A MC PHERSON, RICHARD D MELNIK, FEDOR 1221 DREW ST # A-3 MC PHERSON, SANDRA 225 SW 146TH ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4005 BAYSHORE RD SEATTLE WA 98166 - 1913 CAPE MAY NJ 08204 - 4109 0 METZLER ENTERPRISES INC MICHAELS, MARY F 1ONTROSE, WENDY S 1212 CLEVELAND ST MICHAELS, RICHARD K 7254 MITCHELL RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4907 1221 DREW ST # A6 BROOKSVILLE FL 34601 - 5663 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4924 NEWMAN, EDWARD C NEWMAN, AUDREY L PO BOX 4073 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4073 NOTARO, CATHERINE 1221 DREW ST # C2 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4921 PAULL, BONNIE 11755 RIVERVIEW DR ST LOUIS MO 63138 - 3610 PUGLIATTI, LUISELLA 14 AV DUMAS CH-1206 GENEVA 00008 - SWITZERLAND REMARK, MARIANNE THE 11513 STREAMVIEW AVE NW UNIONTOWN OH 44685 - 8214 NIES, JOHN R 1218 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4942 PAPIESE, CARL PAPIESE, MONICA 1221 DREW ST # C10 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4921 POULIN, WILLIAM L 1250 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4946 RACCO, COSIMO RACCO, MARIA 2062 HEADON FOREST DR BURLINGTON ON L7M 2C7 CANADA NORRIS, WAYNE J NORRIS, ANN L 64 ABBEY LN LEVITTOWN NY 11756 - 4009 PAUL, CHANDRA PAUL, OLDA B 1221 DREW ST # B13 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - PRETZLAFF, GUSTAV 1120 VILLAVIEW RD CLEVELAND OH 44119 - 2942 RANIERI, ANTONIO RANIERI, ANTONETTA 4 LARK PATH 00030- LIVERPOOL NY 13090 - RENFROE FAMILY TRUST RENFROE, CLYDE E JR THE 1221 DREW ST # B12 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4939 RMS FAMILY RESTAURANTS INC ROBERTS, ANN 9400 S DADELAND BLVD STE 103 ROCKWOOD PARK 720 ST HILL RD MIAMI FL 33156 - 2844 E GRINSTEAD SUSSEX RH19 4JX 00009- UNITED KINGDOM ROBSON, FRANK ROMANO, ANTONIO ROBSON, EMILY ROMANO, MARIE 1228 GROVE ST 369 WHITMORE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4942 TORONTO ON M6E 2N5 00030 - CANADA SAVIO, TIMOTHY PO BOX 1117 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4030 SAWYER, BEATRICE P 1221 DREW ST # C-9 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4921 REPULDA, MELBA DELACRUZ 1221 DREW ST # B17 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4997 ROBINSON, CAROL C 1221 DREW ST # E2 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4923 ROMERO, CIRO 1247 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4945 SCHILL, VINCENT L SCHILL, SHARON E 1221 DREW ST # C5 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4926 SCHLOSSER, KARL J SEABLOOM, CLARK G SECCHIARI, W RICHARD 606 S BETTY LN # 5 SEABLOOM, MARGARET K 111 N LINCOLN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6052 411 CLEVELAND ST PMB 240 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4958 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 9 SEMBLER E D P PTR # 13 LTD 5858 CENTRAL AVE ST PETERSBURG FL 33707 - 1728 SHARP, STELLA A 1221 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4904 SHERMAN, PHILLIP SHERMAN, VIRGINIA 2409 UNITY AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 - 3449 SMITH, HAROLD D NEWELL, EUNICE P 1875 PIERCY DR AKRIN OH 44312 - 5440 SOCHOCKI, MARY S 1250 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4911 TZEKAS, RAIM TZEKAS, XHEZIJE 255 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2504 VASH, JOHN G HUBER, HAZEL I 1221 DREW ST # A10 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4929 WEBER, CLEMENT WEBER, JOAN 5716 W 15TH ST SIOUX FALLS SD 57106 - 0221 SIMMONS, FRANCIS E 1267 PARK ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5827 SMOLI EVSKAYA-KHALMOV, GALINA G KHALMOV, RAKHMAN N 1221 DREW ST # A2 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4924 TOLIN, ELMER J 2509 43RD ST NW CANTON OH 44709 - 2123 UGOLINI, MICHAEL D UGOLINI, BARBARA A 2839 N 2350TH RD SENECA IL 61360 - VILLANI, GIOVANNI 5 DENIS MONTREAL EAST PQ H1 B 5H4 00030- CANADA WILFORD, HARRY J 81 26TH AVE SW CEDAR RAPIDS IA 52404 - 4113 WINDLE, LEIF G WOLFF, TARA WINDLE, KATHLEEN M 64 YAIR ST MILLWOOD LAKEVIEW RD RAMAT-GAN 52243 - 0001 FURNACE WOOD FELBRIDGE ISRAEL WEST SUSSEX RH19 2QE 00003 - GREAT BRITAIN WYRWAS, KRYSTYNA WYRWAS, JAROSLAV HORAK 3636 103RD AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 5474 fARRON, ANNA C R PO BOX 905 LINDALE TX 75771 - 0905 SKYRME, PAMELA Y 481 LIMEWOOD PL DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7222 SNEDEKER, CLIFFORD E SNEDEKER, DEANNA L 100 N MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4862 TSAMBIS, CHARLES TSAMBIS, JEAN 1221 DREW ST # B-1 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4925 VASCONI, SHIRLEY L 2493 ALHAMBRA CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2624 WALDNER, MONIKA 1472 BYRAM DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1504 WILFORD, J HARRY 81 26TH AVE SW CEDAR RAPIDS IA 52404 - 4113 WOLKOWSKY, THOMAS C WOLKOWSKY, PATRICIA A 1450 MAPLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5014 Schodtler, John From: Jaycee Roth Uaycee5552002@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 10:13 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: aVIP Center/boarding 0 Page 1 of 1 Hi John, Here are a few more points that I wanted you to have before the meeting tomorrow. I hope this will help us in this boarding situation. 1. 1 would also like to help visitors that come to our beautiful city and stay at the hotels. I will have pick up and delivery service for the guests that want to go visiting or to our gorgeous beaches and need a place to keep the pet for a few days. 2. I also want to work with the rescue groups and help adopt pets in need. Rescue dogs need a place to stay while the group is working to find a new home and I wanted to help with that. 3. I also would like to work with the SPCA for dogs in adoption status and help them get groomed and find a new home. The SPCA needs a place that will help the pets to find new homes. I know I do not need to say how important this part is to the success of the business. John, when I went to all the facilities when I was in the planning process, boarding was the least concern to the owners. This can make a mark for us in Clearwater as a pet loving city. It is also one of the best revenues a center can have. I am hoping and praying. Thank you for all your help and concern. Jaycee Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best Spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 8/4/2005 Page 1 of 2 Schodtler, John From: Jaycee Roth Uaycee5552002@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 12:40 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: [BULK] A VERY IMPORTANT PET CENTER Importance: Low To: John Schodder From: Jaycee Roth/A Very Important Pet This is a business that is only about dogs that are very important to our lives. A Very Important Pet Center, is designed to be a center to improve the life of our canine family member and help the human give, their very loved pet the quality of security and life we feel they deserve. The center will have an evaluation process to evaluate what is needed for this pet. No pit bulls or chows will be permitted. They are a powerful animal and a pit bull has more power in their jaws than any other canine. Any obsessive barkers will not be accepted to spend time at the center. There will be in-home training for dogs that have issues. A premiere center that fits into the redevelopment program of Clearwater that will be clean and unique. BAKERY The dog bakery will have only healthy food and treats. No preservatives and will be also used in training treats. I feel this will be about 15% of the business. I will be using high school students to help bake. BOARDING Boarding is a very important part of the center for many reasons. I would like to be an evacuation center in times of disaster for pets. This is NOT a kennel situation with dogs caged and unhappy. I would like to promote this part of the business for people in Clearwater that have an emergency situation and have a need to board their dog at the spur of the moment. With all the new homes coming to Clearwater and older clientele I feel this will be a very important part of the business. In times of going out of town and need to have a caring atmosphere that you know will take excellent care of your canine. Free pick up service will be available for anyone who is in time of need to have their pet cared for and can not take them with them. Many people coming to Clearwater on vacation bring their loved pets and need a place to board them when they go places that the pet can not come. I personally have spoke with many people in that exact situation that would love to see a center like this. During holidays when clearwater residence want to go on short vacations they will be able to count on this center. I will have a night person in attendance at all times to make sure all dogs are safe and protected. I am planning a small area at the side of the building next to the door for the dogs relieving themselves. The large area is not designed for constant urination. The allocated area will have grass palates that will be replaced every couple of weeks to keep the area fresh and clean. This area is close to the door so they can go out and come right back in. Dogs will be in for the night no later than 7:30 P.M. There will be no barking or dog noises. Dog service will open at 6:00 A.M. with front door service of drop off. The dogs will be escorted to a confined area until all is calm and submissive. A vet will be available to service any needs. This is a very important part of the plan to make this become a dog center that the people of Clearwater can count on. A place to be proud that this establishment is in such a beautiful area and the City of Clearwater values how people feel about.their loved pets. I feel this will be about 40% of the business 8/3/2005 • Page 2 of 2 because it would also limit the day care services and all other aspects of the business including grooming. DAYCARE Day care I feel does not really need much explanation. All dogs in day care will have training and the goal to day care is to help make each canine a charming and polite part of our lives. 17% of the business. PICK UP SERVICES Pick up and delivery services will be available to help all residence if they can not get out or can not drive to have a service that cares enough to come get their pet at a reasonable price whether for day, boarding, grooming or training. GROOMING Grooming in the center will be a part that I would like to help high school students learn to take care of their own dogs. To have volunteers that will brush out your dog and play with them. To assist the groomers. There are many students that would like to be in the animal business and this will give them an opportunity to learn first hand. Grooming will be approximately 18% of the business. AGILITY Jumping and obedience training in the outside area. Getting dogs ready to show at the nationals. I feel this would be a very important part of activities including small classes for the young handler and teaching young people to care for animals. RETAIL The remaining part of the business will be retail sales of unique items and fun retail. I will also have medications and a vet for monthly visits. 10% of the business. This is a very important part of the whole business working as a center that the residence of Clearwater can count on when they need help with the dog in their lives. I have contacted many of the TV shows, Oprah, Ellen, and 20/20. I am working hard at getting media coverage to show what a fine center we have in Clearwater. I sincerely hope you will consider the boarding aspect of the business. This inside area is 3200 square feet and this area can easily accommodate 40 boarding dogs. Most will be cage free. At the end of the night after being entertained my canine visitors will be tired and ready to sleep. I hope you will consider my request. Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 8/3/2005 10.10 am Case Number: FLS2005-06045 -- 1242 CLEVELAND ST • Owner(s): Raim Tzekas 255 Bayside Dr Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant A Very Important Pet Salon 1725 Albemarle Rd Clearwater, Fl 33764 TELEPHONE: 727-459-4400, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Jaycee Roth. 330 Duncan Loop E Dunedin, Fl 34698 TELEPHONE: 727-459-4400, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: jaycee5552002@yahoo.com Location: 0.48 acres located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Cleveland Street and Lincoln Avenue. Atlas Page: 287B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to allow retail sales/service (Pet Salon) use in the Downtown District, per Section 3-902.N. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1) No Issues. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 , No Issues Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: I . No issues - conversion of existing restaurant into pet center Stormwater: 1 . No Issues Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 13 Show City standardOx 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway id intersection of S.R. 60/Lincoln Avenue. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904) 2. Driveways do not meet the connection spacing requirements of Community Development Code Seceion 3-102.D.1. Eliminate eastern driveway on Cleveland Street and install sidewalk and landscaping. 3. Show dimensions of all driveways, drive aisles and parking stalls. 4. Provide handicap parking space near accessible entrance. 5. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with. City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118) 6. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. Planning: No Comments Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 14 East Gateway District The East Gateway District is bounded by Drew Street on the north, Highland Avenue on the east, Missouri Avenue on the west and Court Street on the south and is shown on Map 8, page 57. This District is comprised of 686 parcels totaling 175.6 acres and represents 32.5 percent of the Downtown area. Existing Character East Gateway is generally characterized by a mixed land use pattern of residential housing interspersed with pockets of poorly maintained rental properties and outdated strip commercial. This District struggles with a negative image of crime due to the location of problematic uses such as day labor facilities, old motels and social service agencies that provide services to the homeless population. The commercial sector is burdened with a declining business base, an array of deteriorating infrastructure, a mismatch of uses, and an increasing number of vacant storefronts. Relatively well- maintained small professional offices and St. Cecilia's Catholic School anchor the southern edge of the East Gateway. District Vision Uses It is envisioned that the East Gateway will be a vibrant, stable, diverse neighborhood defined by its unique cultural base and mixed land uses. It will continue to be developed as a low and medium density residential neighborhood supported with neighborhood commercial and professional offices concentrated along the major corridors of Cleveland Street, Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Court Street and Missouri Avenue. The areas northeast of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and north of Cleveland Street and east of Hillcrest Avenue should be maintained as a primarily low density, low-rise residential neighborhood. The areas southwest of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, south of Cleveland Street, and north of Cleveland Street west of Hillcrest Avenue are appropriate for medium- and high-density multi- family residential. Institutional uses should remain primarily south of Cleveland Street. Function Although the East Gateway District is predominantly a residential neighborhood, it will be the primary entrance to the Downtown Core once the new Memorial Causeway Bridge opens. Consequently, this presents an opportunity to define and improve the function of this District with attractive streetscape and landscaping elements along with appropriate wayfinding signage. 74 • , 0 Development Patterns The existing residential areas should retain their scale and development patterns and any infill development in this area should reflect the existing low-rise pattern. New multi- family development should be developed at a medium density and scale and provide variety in housing types and pricing. It is envisioned that new commercial development should provide employment opportunities for the District's residents as well as serve the daily commercial and personal service needs of the neighborhood. Commercial and office development should be redeveloped at a scale compatible with the neighborhood; consolidation of small obsolete development parcelsibuildings is encouraged to create an adequate lot size for modern development standards. Prohibited Uses Automobile service stations, all types of vehicle sales and service uses, fast food restaurants with drive-through services, adult uses, industrial and problematic uses (examples include, but are not limited to, day labor, pawn shops, check cashing and blood plasma centers and body piercing and tattoo parlors.) Intensi A. A portion of the East Gateway has a future land use plan designation of Central Business District (CDB) and is zoned D, Downtown. This section is generally located between Missouri and Frederica Avenues one block north and south of Cleveland Street and is depicted on Map 9, page 77. Development shall be permitted as follows within this area: Floor Area Ratio - 0.55 FAR; Density- 30 dwelling units per acre or 40 hotel units per acre Hecht Office - 50% Commercial -25'-35'; Multi-family dwellings - 50' B. The remaining portion of the East Gateway does not have the Central Business District (CBD) land use category and is governed by a variety of residential and nonresidential plan categories. These categories, along with the current zoning designations shall govern intensity and density, as well as height. However, development shall also be consistent with the East Gateway character district. East Gateway District Policies Policy 1: Any proposed rezoning and/or land use plan amendment within the East Gateway should be consistent with this Plan. 75 i it ! cl- Policy 2: The residential base including rental properties should be stabilized by providing for an improved mix of affordable and market-rate housing options including infill developments, rehabilitations, homeownership and rental housing choices. Policy 3: The expansion of the existing Clearwater Homeless Intervention Project (CHIP) facilities should be supported as a Downtown "campus" that will address the emergency and transitional housing needs of the Downtown homeless (within a structured/supervised program), and which will prevent future intrusion of scattered homeless facilities throughout the neighborhood. Policy 4: The concentration of problematic uses, especially day labor facilities, should be reduced through voluntary relocation or amortization. Policy 5: The rehabilitation of existing motels into residential apartments shall be prohibited. Policy 6: Foster a sense of neighborhood cohesion through urban design elements, as well as through the creation of neighborhood associations. Policy 7: Attract and assist existing retail and personal service establishments in order to create neighborhood employment opportunities. Policy 8: New development on Gulf to Bay Boulevard shall be oriented toward the Street to encourage pedestrian activity. Policy 9: Evaluate limited expansions of the Commercial and Downtown zoning District boundaries on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Cleveland Street that may create opportunities for commercial expansions and/or redevelopment that is consistent with Community Development Code requirements. Policy 10: Residential development fronting on Cleveland Street may only be permitted if part of a mixed use development. Policy 11: Encourage the assembly of vacant and underutilized properties, as well as the demolition of deteriorated buildings to accommodate redevelopment projects that meet Clearwater Community Development Code standards. Policy 12: Encourage the adaptive re-use of underutilized buildings in the event redevelopment is not feasible. Policy 13: Provide neighborhood-wide education programs relating to housing maintenance and life safety issues prior to conducting any systematic code enforcement program. 76 Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No 17 r-, r7l j7 T7. f7 17 T-5 l r 177 F C f. 7 r- 17 17 E-1 1 1..7 0 i 1 r 17 is Address: 0 N/A 1 I. SITE DESIGN l Appropriate f • Retention of the existing street grid pattern where it contributes to an active pedestrian environment. • Blocks which promote easy pedestrian access and encourage cross-use. • Redevelopments that reopen previously vacated rights--of-way or create new rights-of-way. r7 • Provision of new vehicular and pedestrian access/circulation that effectively serves the proposed development and vicinity if a vacation of a right-of-way is requested. l • Lots which maintain a consistent size, scale, pattern and rhythm of the surrounding block(s). 1J I Inappropriate: >_ i • Vacating existing rights-of-way to form consolidated blocks without providing alternative pedestrian and vehicular access to serve the proposed development and vicinity. lj • Large blocks which prohibit pedestrian access through the block and/or prohibit access within and around the development. 2. Pedestrian Circulation/Access r7 Appropriate: l • Clearly defined, safe, direct, convenient and landscaped pedestrian pathways provided between streets, parking areas and buildings. 1 i • Pedestrian scaled lighting such as lighted bollards; 173 • Vertical elements such as bollards, markers, arches or architectural details. i7 • Alleys and courtyards that match or complement either the building or the primary street to which the alley connects with regard to materials, architecture, color and street furniture (waste receptacles, benches, lighting, etc.). • Specialized paving design especially where pedestrian and vehicular paths intersect. • Pedestrian passageways which go through buildings such as an arcade. F! Inappropriate: 11 • Developments which do not include direct access from surrounding streets and parking areas. Case: Addres DRC: CDB: Yes II No II N/A r r r' o Large developments which do not provide pedestrian walkways through the block on which the development is located. F- r O Pedestrian passageways too narrow to be useable or not designed at a human scale. ri r r o Pedestrian passageways that create an unsafe environment. B. Access, Circulation and Parking: 1. Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parkin r r C Appropriate: 1 r r, o The location, number and design of driveways which maintain the urban fabric of the downtown. r r r o Vehicular access from secondary street frontage or alley. r r j O Interior lot access limited to the minimum number of curb cuts to adequately serve the site. r r O Parking areas for townhouse developments located within the interior of the development that maintains the integrity of the primary facade as the preferred design. For townhouse projects located on low traffic-volume streets with site characteristics that prevent internal parking, parking may be directly accessed from the street provided it is co-located with shared driveways. . 1 1 r r o Detached garages and carports serving single-family uses located in line with or behind the rear of the principal building. r r r O Residential uses along Clearwater Harbor designed with parking garages or with parking areas internal to the site/ building and screened from Clearwater Harbor and any abutting right-of-way. 1""' r r C Attached garages in residential developments, architecturally integrated with the design of the principal structure. r, r r c Driveways functionally integrated into the design of the development. r-,, r r O Joint/common access driveways between sites. ri r r o Shared parking where a mix of uses creates staggered peak periods of parking demand. f 3 r r G Parking lots located behind the primary fagade of the principal building. r r r C Parking lot design that minimizes negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views. r r r O Parking lots adjacent to rights-of-way that are screened with either a landscaped buffer or a solid wall or fence three feet in height. 2 Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No 1771 17 i 1'" F. l? l C 1 T-7 1 r7 r- , 1 M 3 • Address: 0 I N/A Large parking lots visually and functionally segmented into smaller lots with landscaped islands and canopy. l • The use of interlocking pavers, brick or other similarly textured materials for parking lot surfacing and/or accents. 17 • Parking garages as the principal uses that are architecturally integrated with surrounding developments and/or the envisioned character of the area. ril • Parking garages as the principal use within the Downtown Core located on Cleveland Street, Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues with at least 75 percent of the ground floor of each facade on all adjacent street frontages occupied by active uses. Active uses include restaurant, retail, entertainment or other uses/features determined to be pedestrian-oriented. 171 • Parking garages accessory to a principal use that are architecturally integrated with the design, materials, finish and color of the principal structure(s) on the lot. 1.7 • Ground floors of parking garages accessory to a principal use with at least 75 percent of the primary facade occupied by the principal use/features or other use determined to be complementary to the principal use. • Upper floors of all parking garages designed to visually screen vehicles from view from rights-of-way and public open spaces. Screening includes landscaping, walls, architectural elements or other decorative features. • Parking garages with clearly marked points of ingress and egress. Inappropriate: 17 • Curb cuts at every site. 17 • Parking lots or garages as the most prominent feature of any development. 1 ! • Parking garages difficult to enter and/or with poorly defined entrances. 1°7 • The appearance of a "sea of asphalt" from the rights-of-way. 1. • Parking lots/garages which create an unsafe environment. Case: Address DRC: CDS: Yes II No II N/A C. Site Elements: 1. Open Space 1-3 I- r Appropriate: r F, • Open spaces which function as transitions between the public sidewalks and streets and the use of the property (residences, offices, stores, etc.). r _J r r • Clearly defined entrances into open spaces with direct access from adjacent streets and adequate buffering from vehicular traffic. r r • Open spaces that are visible and inviting to the pedestrian. r, 1- TD • Open spaces which utilize an aesthetically coordinated marriage between hardscape (buildings, planters, lighting, walls, fences, paving, etc.) and landscape (trees, shrubs, annuals, perennials, etc.) elements. ri I"`n` r, • Large open spaces broken into smaller, human-scale spaces through the use of changes of grade, planters, pots, landscaping, sculpture, fences, walls, etc. M r- ri • Open spaces designed to relate and connect to adjacent properties. 1` I r- • Formal or informal seating appropriate to the scale and function of the open space. Seating may include park benches, the tops of garden/planter walls, monumental stairs, etc. l 17 17 • The location of public art in accessible open spaces designed and located so as to enrich the pedestrian experience and create a stronger sense of place. 17 r- L F Inappropriate: F-1 r- Open spaces not easily accessible from public streets or that become unsafe "dead" spots r r • Lack of seating, shade and clearly defined perimeters. 1 3 1? 1? • Open space that does not relate with the uses and buildings surrounding it. 4 Case: DRC: CDB: I Yes I No N/A • Address: i 2. Buffering and Screening a. Mechanical Equipment, Concealed Wireless Communication Facilities, Loading and Service Areas. r l?" 17 l r r 1` 1 r- 1.7 1- r- ltt 17 r] r Ul F- 1 ri- r U 1``. f-] { 17 U 5 Appropriate: • When located at grade, mechanical and utility equipment that is placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way with fences, walls and/or landscaping. • When located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment that is integrated into the design of the building through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. • Concealed wireless communication facilities (antennas, satellite dishes, etc.) attached to buildings and not visible from any public right-of-way. Appropriate concealing methods include painting the facility to match the color of the building, concealing the facility by an architecturally-integrated features, such as the use of faux windows, dormers, chimneys, parapets, etc. or other similar methods. • Service and loading areas accessed from secondary streets, screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way and placed in visually unobtrusive locations. • Solid waste containers placed in the most unobtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of- way. Inappropriate: • Solid waste containers and service and loading areas located adjacent to residentially used lots when an alternative location is feasible. • Mechanical and utility equipment that visually dominates a site. • Freestanding wireless communication facilities. b. Landscaping Appropriate: • Landscaping compatible with the climatic conditions of West Central Florida that includes the use of native plant species and Xeriscape landscape techniques. • Plant species that are appropriate to the space in which they will occupy with regard to water needs, growth rates, size, etc. in order to conserve water, reduce maintenance and promote plant health. Case: Address DRC: CDB: Yes II No II N/A r r r r r r r r r r r r lrw!€ r r r r r r' r r r r 1 r r r r r r r r r F_ o Landscape design which augments and supports architectural features of the building/site where located. o Landscape design that visually screens unsightly views, aesthetically supports important vistas and reinforces the character district in which it is located. r o Plantings in landscape beds, planters or pots that soften the edges between buildings and pedestrian areas. rl o Trees planted in paved areas provided with adequate room to grow (landscape beds, tree grates or other protective techniques). r o Landscape design and maintenance that engenders a sense of personal safety. r Inappropriate: r o Landscaping used in lieu of appropriate architectural details and good building design. r o Landscaping planted without an adequate irrigation system. r o The use of non-hardy plant species. r o Use of the wrong plant in the wrong space such as plantings with inadequate room to grow and/or plantings inappropriate for an active pedestrian area, etc. r o Landscaping allowed to become overgrown decreasing aesthetics and safety. c. Fences and Walls r Appropriate: r o Fences and walls that complement and are consistent with the principal structure with regard to materials, texture, size, shape and color. r o The location, height and design of fences and walls compatible with the intended use, design of the site and architecture of the building. r o Solid fences and walls along rights-of-way no higher than three feet. Any portion of a fence or wall above three feet in height that is at least 50 percent open. r o Posts or columns that include decorative caps which extend up to, 12 inches above the otherwise allowable fence height. r o Vertical elements such as posts, columns, etc. incorporated into the design of the fence or wall spaced at appropriate intervals in relation to the materials used and overall length. 6 Case: Address: DRC: CD?B:? I Yes I No I lv/A 1 • Property lines and private areas defined through the use of fences where feasible. F 1..; 1` F 11 17 F r r- f` T 1~ r r F U r 1? r r r 1 F fns 1°°'7 F r 1" ' r 1.: 1" F r- 7 Inappropriate: • The portion of walls and/or fences along a right-of-way greater than three feet in height above. grade that are more than fifty percent solid. • Chain link or barbed wire fences. • Unpainted or unfinished walls and fences.. II. BUILDING PLACEMENT A. Location: B. Orientation C. Separation: D. Coverage: Appropriate: • Buildings that maintain the build-to line or the setback of the development's block and the block(s) across the street. Corner lots that maintain the location pattern for a distance of two blocks including both sides of the street. • Buildings located farther from the build-to line that provide a courtyard, steps, entryway, arcade, plaza or other pedestrian- oriented design features which maintains the build-to line. • Buildings with reduced setbacks that reflect the predominant surrounding or desired development pattern. • Buildings oriented to face public rights-of-way. • Separation between buildings that provide adequate useable space such as an alley or open space compliant with the requirements of these Guidelines. • Developments which provide coverage similar to surrounding properties and/or that meet the desired vision of the character district. Inappropriate: • Buildings that break up the common build-to line by locating farther back or forward than the predominant block patterns on the subject's site and the opposite side of the street. • Corner lots that do not maintain the location pattern for a distance of two blocks including both sides of the street. Case: Address DRC: CDB: Yes II No II N/A F F r • Buildings separated at a distance which precludes the provision of Guideline-compliant alleys and open space. • Separations between buildings that are out of scale and proportion with the district's existing or desired development pattern F 1- 1`, • . Buildings which do not address the primary street. E. Additional Requirements for Character Districts and Special Areas Transition Areas 1` r r Appropriate: f.- r r • Buildings 30 feet or less in height that are setback a minimum of 10 feet from the Plan Area boundary. lei F rz, • Buildings taller than 30 feet in height that provide a setback of a minimum of 10 feet plus an additional one foot for each two feet of height above 30 feet. III. BUILDING DESIGN A. Form: 1. Mass/Scale: a. Height: b. Width: c. Depth: d. Rhythm/Spacinz r l- Appropriate: l C r-7 Building form which visually relates to surrounding buildings and the desired character of the area with regard to mass, scale, height, width and depth. r f° • Buildings that have a distinct "base," "middle" and "cap." r r • Low-rise buildings and/or those with long facade widths that accentuate vertical elements such as entrances and columns, or by breaking up the facade plane into a greater number of smaller vertical masses. r r7 • Mid- and high-rise buildings that utilize horizontal elements that minimize the apparent height of a. building such as balconies, banding, cornice and parapet lines, etc. (" • High-rise buildings that use one or more of the following depending on overall building height and the existing or desired character of the surrounding area. 8 Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No N/A r r r r r, r_7 r 17 r r r- r7, r r r F r F r r= r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 1`° r r7 0 Address: 0 ? The width of the upper portions of buildings reduced to minimize the overall building mass (reducing the size of the floor plate). ? Building stories or/stepbacks differentiated by architectural features including but not limited to coping, balustrades, cornice lines, change in materials, etc. ? Stepbacks used as the building increases in height. • Buildings that terminate views emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. • Maintaining a consistent building depth when feasible to allow the location of shared parking lots and/or secondary entrances. • Buildings which correspond to the existing and/or desired rhythm and spacing of surrounding buildings through the use of common points of agreement such as windows, doors, recesses, reliefs and other architectural elements. • Buildings which maintain the existing and/or desired pattern of the placement and size of windows, doors, shutters, and other architectural elements on adjacent buildings with regard to both the ground floor and upper stories. • Finished floor heights a minimum of two feet above the sidewalk grade for residential buildings within predominantly mixed use or commercial areas. Inappropriate: • Buildings which do not relate to the surrounding or desired and envisioned context and fabric of the neighborhood with regard to size, scale, height, width and depth. • Buildings that visually overpower adjacent buildings. • Buildings that do not maintain a common building depth based on the predominant lot pattern. • Buildings that do not maintain the existing and/or desired pattern of windows and doors along a block face. • Facades on multi-story structures which do not incorporate meaningful architectural details such as cornice lines, banding, string courses, columns, recesses, relief, etc. 9 Case: Addres DRC: CDB: Yes No N/A ri r C r l r r; c r r lid r ri r r r r ri l 1; l r r7 r r r= r r, r r r r- 3. Additional Requirements for Downtown Core alonji Cleveland Street Appropriate: o Buildings along Cleveland Street taller than the predominant height of other buildings on the project's block that stepback at that predominant height. o Additional stepbacks used the more the building exceeds the predominant height. Inappropriate: O Building widths that visually overpower adjacent buildings. B. Architecture: Appropriate: o New development that incorporates an architectural style or architectural elements consistent with the existing and/or desired style of development in the surrounding neighborhood. o New development that complements the architectural heritage of the district in which they are located. o Multiple buildings within a single project which relate architecturally with each other and the surrounding neighborhood. Inappropriate: o Use of an architectural style which does not complement the fabric of the surrounding neighborhood. C Use of multiple and/or conflicting architectural styles within a single building or between several buildings within a single project. Facade Desil4n: a. Primary and Corner Facades Appropriate: o The primary facades as the most highly designed fagade utilizing the following elements: ? A change in plane, building wall projection or recess; ? Architectural details; ? Variety in color, material, texture; ? Doors and/or windows; ? Storefront display windows for retail uses; and ? Other details as appropriate to the building style. 10 Case: DRC: CD?B: I Y es I No N/A 17 f- 17 r. C- 1? F_ F_ l • Address: • • An architecturally prominent entrance with door located on the primary facade. • Primary entrances emphasized through the use of a combination of: ? A protruding front gable or stoop; ? Projection or recession in the building footprint ? Variation in building height; ? Canopy or portico; ? Raised cornice or parapet over door; ? Arches; ? Columns; ? Ornamental and structural architectural details other than cornices over or on the sides of the building; ? Towers; and ? Other treatment that emphasizes the primary entrance. • Primary facade, in keeping with established patterns, which include three articulated architectural parts: a base, middle and cap. The proportion of these three elements will vary depending on the scale of the building. • Major architectural treatments on the principal building facade that are continued around all sides of the building that are visible from the public realm. • Covered drop-off areas. • Open porches. • Buildings on corner lots that emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. • Entrances provided along each street facade or a single entrance prominently located on the corner. Inappropriate: • Facades without articulation or other architectural detail to provide visual interest and variety on the facade. • Primary facades with an undefined entrance. • Entrances not architecturally integrated into the design of the facade. • Buildings on corners that do not treat each adjacent designated street equally. • An unfinished facade along a street. Case: . Address. DRC: CDB: Yes r r r r l 1 r '` 'r.7 f r r, No r r 1 r r r r r r r r r r r r N/A b. Secondary Facades F Appropriate: F • An overall design of the secondary facades of the building consistent with that of the primary facade with regard to architectural style, materials, finish, color and detail. F • Architectural embellishments, awnings, landscaping and signs used to identify the secondary entrance. • Entrances facing parking lots, plazas and waterfronts. r Inappropriate: • Buildings that do not provide an entrance along a secondary facade. l • A secondary facade which does not enhance or support the architectural style of the building. c. Side Facades r= Appropriate: r • An overall design of the side facades of the building consistent with that of the primary facade with regard to architectural style, materials, finish, color and detail. r • Architectural embellishments, awnings, landscaping and signs used to identify secondary entrances if provided. r Inappropriate: • A side facade which does not enhance or support the architectural style of the building. d. Windows and Doors Appropriate*: r • Windows that are appropriately sized for the scale and style of the building on which they are located. • Windows along all streets. I? • Windows within a building/development that creates a consistent and cohesive fenestration pattern. • Windows that are similar in proportion to windows on adjacent buildings or with established and/or desired patterns along the adjoining block faces. The degree of similarity of the window pattern increases in importance the closer the buildings are to each other. r • Windows in commercial areas that are appropriately sized and located to allow for display and/or view into the interior of the building. 12 Case: Address: i DRC : CDB: Yes r r' No 1? 1 N/A l 1 T 1 1- lW`. U r 17 F T7 T7 F 01, r T-11 )? ? l II r 11 17 r l 1~" r- 1 1- r r 13 • Bulkheads below and transoms above display windows when appropriate for the architectural style of the building. • Clear glass (88 percent light transmission or the maximum permitted by any applicable Building Codes) installed on ground floor windows except for stained or art glass provided the stained or art glass is in character with the style of the building (churches, craftsman buildings, etc.). • Glass block used as an accent. • Screen doors provided the design is compatible with the architecture and materials of the building. • Doors which enhance and support the architectural style of the building. • Doors appropriately sized for the scale of the building facade on which they are located. • Doors with transoms and fan lights when appropriate for the architectural style of the building. *Utility/Infrastructure and Public Facilities are exempted from the requirements of windows and doors below and are fully addressed in the Signs and Miscellaneous section of these Guidelines. Inappropriate: • The use of incompatible window types and shapes on the same structure. • Mirrored glass and glass curtain walls. • Storefront windows that extend to the ground without a traditional bulkhead. • Tinted or reflective glass with less than 88 percent light transmission. • Blackened out windows or any other use of material that achieves that effect. • Boarded up windows (except during construction or during a reasonable repair period or subsequent to a weather advisory). • Walls without windows along street frontages. • Doors which are out of scale and/or character with the rest of the building. • Doors which do not enhance the architectural style of the building. • More than one style of door per building. Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No N/A I F r r F r r 1 r i E_ r r C r F_ 1 f? I ri ( l r 1 r f- 1` 17 r F_ r 1 14 • Addresso e. Roof Design Appropriate: • A roof consistent with the style of the building utilizing architectural elements such as cornice treatments, roof overhangs with brackets, steeped parapets, richly textured materials and/or differently colored materials. • Multiple rooftops on varying levels on large buildings that help break up the vertical mass of a building. • High-rise buildings which utilize sculpted roofs in order to establish an interesting and enhanced skyline unique to Downtown Clearwater. • Roof shapes consistent with the existing and/or desired character of the surrounding area. • The portions of building stepbacks that are fully finished and complement the architectural style of the building and the main roof structure. Inappropriate: • Colored stripesibands on flat roofs. • Mansard roofs. • Flat roofs within public view from grade not hidden by a parapet or other architectural feature. • Roofs inconsistent with the architectural style of the building. L Other Architectural Features Appropriate: • Shutters and canvas awnings sized to match the corresponding window openings. • Shutters and awnings the shapes, materials, proportions, design, color, lettering and hardware of which are in character with the style of the building. • Awnings made of high quality fire-rated/retardant fabric and a minimum of five feet in depth to protect pedestrians from inclement weather. • First floor awnings placed no higher than the midpoint between the top of the first story window and the bottom of the second story windowsill. • Hurricane shutters, if provided, fitted as an integral part of the storefront design, not visible when not in use and only to be used during the timeframe in which a formally issued hurricane Case: Address: • DRC: CDB: Yes No N/A ) fW r r; , n r r f r F M t r 1'` C` r ` F7 T r r f7 1f 15 warning is in effect. • Electronic security systems utilized as an alternative to security bars. • Fire stairs/egress designed as unobtrusive as possible by matching the primary structure with regard to materials, design and color of the structure. Where feasible, they should not be visible from the street. • Devices which discourage the congregation of animals (pigeons, squirrels, etc.) placed in the least visually obtrusive locations possible and/or designed to blend in with the overall architectural style of the building. • The inclusion of other architectural details and elements (clocks, railings, flower boxes, etc.) as appropriate to the style and function of the building and architecturally integrated with the design of the building. • Gutters, downspouts, utility boxes, meters, etc. located as visually unobtrusively as possible. Where feasible, they should not be visible from the street. Inappropriate: • Visible, permanent or roll-down security bars/gates. • Solar collectors visible from the street. • Awnings made of high-gloss or fabrics which appear to be plastic. • Backlit awnings. 2. Materials and Color: a. Materials Appropriate: • Materials compatible with the existing and/or desired context of the surrounding area and that are common to the area's historic construction methods/style. • Buildings that are built as high-quality' long-term components to the urban fabric constructed as maintenance free as possible . • Building materials consistent with and relating to the architectural style of the building. • Building materials appropriate to the scale of the building. • The use of contemporary materials adapted to historic design elements. Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No N/A 17 r- F !._ 1_F i Iwo 1?? 1 1 1 1r l? 1? 1 r 1 Addres 19 Alk 1 o Storefront level and upper levels that use visually compatible materials. O Use of the following durable materials within the first three floors of all buildings and recommended for all other floors.: ? Wood, stucco and/or or masonry exteriors. ? Masonry exteriors finished in rusticated block.. ? Stucco, brick, stone, etc. ? Storefront side piers, when provided, constructed of the same material as the upper fagade or covered with stucco. ? Pre-cast cast-in--place or architectural concrete . ? Tile and ? Any other material found acceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. Inappropriate: o Exterior walls and skins of buildings designed and/or constructed of materials with a limited life expectancy. o Materials incompatible with the architectural style of the building. a The use of the following materials on building exteriors: ? Poorly crafted or "rustic" woodworking and finishing techniques; ? Cedar shakes; ? Plywood (T1-11 siding, etc.); ? Corrugated, mill finish or reflective metal wall panels; ? Expanded metal (except for limited decorative applications); ? Mill finish aluminum extrusions for windows and doorways; ? Unfinished Concrete Masonry Units (CMU or cinder block); and ? Any other material found unacceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. o The use of the following materials on the first three floors of building exteriors: ? Foam except for architectural details and ornamentation ; ? Exterior insulated finish system (EIFS) except for architectural details and ornamentation ; ? Hardboard siding; ? Plastic, metal and or vinyl siding except for single-family 16 Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No N/A 17. 17 r7 r 17 r7 r -` r 17 r 1 ? 1 7 F f° T7 r f" C r r r f 17` F C r- r f-' C i 1 17 • Address: i dwellings ; ? Fiberglass panels; ? Exposed aggregate (rough finish) concrete wall panels; ? Indoor-outdoor carpeting or astro-turf; and ? Any other material found unacceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. b. Color Appropriate: • The number and type of building colors appropriate for and consistent with the architectural style. • Low reflectance exterior colors. • Gutters, downspouts, utility boxes, meters, etc. painted as part of the overall color scheme. Inappropriate: • Colors that are garish, gaudy, loud, excessive and ostentatious or that constitute a glaring and unattractive contrast to surrounding buildings. • Main body color that is from the deepest tones of the color wheel. • More than three different colors or color shades used on a single building unless appropriate to the architectural style of the building. • The use of fluorescent or day glow colors. • Black as the predominant exterior building color. • Single color schemes. For example using one color on every surface. • Clashing trim colors that are not complementary to the main body color and serve only to attract attention through their dissonance. As an example, yellow and red are clashing colors and not complementary and only serve to attract attention through their dissonance. • A solid line or band of color or group of stripes used in lieu of architectural detail. • Color used to obscure important architectural features. 3. Additional Requirements for development within the Old Bay District east of Garden Avenue. Appropriate: • Offices that are residential in size, scale and design. Case: Addres DRC: CDB: Yes No N/A 4. Development along Cleveland Street between Myrtle and r r r f - r r Osceola Avenues and along Fort Harrison Avenue between Drew and Chestnut Streets. Appropriate: O Development incorporating an architectural style indicative of those found in Downtown Clearwater between 1900 and 1950* and includes: ? 20th Century Commercial Vernacular: One-story or One- Part; ? 20th Century Commercial Vernacular: Two-Part; ? Art Deco; ? Art Moderne; ? Chicago School; ? Mediterranean or Mission Influence; ? Mediterranean Revival; ? Neo-Classical; ? Temple Front. *See Appendix A Architectural Styles for additional details. Buildings which utilize character defining features from any one of the annroved architectural styles listed above through the use of contemporary materials. Inappropriate: G Use of multiple and/or conflicting architectural styles within a single building or between several buildings within a single project. V SIGNS AND MISCELLANEOUS r r 1 r? r r r r r. r r r 1- r r r r r r r 18 A. Signs: Appropriate: C Signs on a building and/or site designed as part of an overall theme that respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building. o Signs whose design, colors, materials, size, shape and methods of illumination reinforce the overall design of the fagade. o Letter size, letter and word spacing, font style and other design elements of a sign that create an overall high quality aesthetic appearance. o Attached signs proportional attached. o Attached signs installed so to the space to which they are the method of installation is Case: DRC: CDB: Yes r C., r T.7 r F r r 17 T711 C r 19 - No N/A r , 1 F r F F F r r F F7 F r r F r r r r r F. r 1 r r] r r r' r! C, r r r F r 40 Address: • concealed or made an integral part of the design of the sign. • Where individual buildings are located with limited side yard setbacks, attached signs that demonstrate a general alignment with the signs on adjacent storefronts/buildings; • Wall signs located on flat, unadorned parts of a facade such as the horizontal band between the storefront and second floor or on windows, awning flaps, fascia, etc. • Wall signs located immediately adjacent to secondary entraces. • Projecting signs located adjacent to the building entrances or tenant space(s) which they serve. • Hanging signs positioned perpendicular to the fagade of the building and located adjacent to the building entrances or tenant space(s) which they serve. • Awning signs which are permanently affixed (sewn to or screened on) to the valance of the awning as part of the overall awning design. • Window signs consisting of paint or decals, etchings/ engravings, neon and/or three-dimensional lighted signs. • Buildings with multiple tenants accessed from the interior of the building which include a directory sign immediately adjacent to that entrance. • Existing, historic signs that are preserved or restored. • Historically accurate reproduced signage documented by physical, documentary and/or pictorial evidence. • Changeable copy which matches the sign to which it is attached with regard to style, size and color. Inappropriate: • Box/cabinet style signs. • Signs utilizing LED or any other electronic changeable copy. • Signs painted directly on the fagade of a building unless documented by physical/historical, documentary and/or pictorial evidence. • Attached signs that cover windows or other architectural features. • Projecting signs higher than the top of second story windows. • More than one hanging or projecting sign per business. • Awning signs which are affixed to the awning material by adhesive backed-letters or other non-permanent methods. • Window signs which are affixed by tape or other non- permanent methods. Case: DRC: CDB: Yes r r r r: l 1"' l 1mm? r r; F C r C r r7j C r F Amh Addres No N/A f O Monument signs on sites where the primary building is located within 15 feet of a front property line. (Note: distance subject to final determination of setback/build-to line of the various character districts.) r r o Changeable copy area greater than 25 percent of the sign area (with the exception of theater marquees). F r o Sandwich board signs. B. Lighting: F r Appropriate: l o Light fixtures that are designed to respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building. r r o Light fixtures that reinforce the overall composition of the facade with regard to color, material, size, scale and shape. r r- o Light poles located adjacent to a public right-of-way that incorporates the same or similar design of light poles as in the character district or complements the design of the building. r r o Attached light fixtures flush mounted on a wall or soffit. r r o Light fixtures that are recessed in ceilings or otherwise concealed. r r o Lighting located in bollards. r r.' o Existing, historic light fixtures preserved in place whenever feasible. r r o Historically accurate reproduced lighting fixtures documented by physical, documentary and/or pictorial evidence. r r • Lighting which illuminates without glare. r r o Utility meters, service locations, wires, piping, boxes, conduits, etc. placed in the most visually unobtrusive location possible. o Electrical wiring to all site lighting provided underground. o Accent lighting illuminating signage, landscaping and trees, water amenities and other special features. 0 An adequate number of light fixtures installed to effectively and safely illuminate pedestrian areas. r r7J Inappropriate: 1r r o Exposed spot and floodlight fixtures used on non-residential properties. r r o Light fixtures placed in a position where existing or future tree canopy will reduce , the illumination levels or otherwise interfere with the light fixture. 20 Case: • Address: • DRC : CDB: Yes No N/A r 17 r F r` r7 f` 17 f7 r r r- r7l C-1 r r r r r 1 r r r f- r F_ 17, F r 17 r7 f f 77-i r- r_1 1.. f- r r- 17 r ri F r f r C r r r C r 1 r 17 r 21 r- r r r'" 1} C 1,77 17 C C • Lighting which illuminates adjacent properties. • Light fixtures that do not relate to the structure/site with regard to materials, color, size, scale and style. • Lighting which is too bright, glaring and overpowering for a space or that is too dim to effectively illuminate. • Neon used to light a building or as a decorative element except where appropriate to the architectural style of the building. • Lighting which results in color distortions within pedestrian and vehicular areas. C. Property Maintenance: Appropriate: • Regular visual inspections of all portions of a building such as the foundation, walls, weather-striping, roofs, etc. • Regular maintenance and repair using quality materials. • Enlisting the services of professionals. • Using the gentlest possible procedures for cleaning. • Consulting a structural engineer prior to commencing any work when structural systems are affected. • Stabilizing/repairing deteriorated or inadequate foundations as soon as physically possible. • Replacing weather-stripping as needed prior to failure. • Replacing loose or missing roof tiles/shingles as soon as damage is observed. • Regular exterior painting and touch-ups as needed. • Inspection and replacing of awnings that show signs of wear, tear, fading, etc. • Regular cleaning and sweeping or adjacent public property. • Keeping windows clean. Inappropriate: • Allowing routine maintenance and repairs to lapse. • The use of harsh chemicals/procedures for cleaning. • Failing to test a cleaning/restoration product/technique on a discreet location first. • Sandblasting and other harsh methods of cleaning that would damage or otherwise compromise the building. • Poorly attached elements that may fall and injure people • Applying paint to fabric awnings. Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No N/A r r r r r r I- r r T7' r r r r r r r 1`- r r r r r r r r r n r r r r r r r r; r 1`° r r r 22 0 Addres D. Pinellas Trail Appropriate: o Providing safe, convenient pedestrian connections between the site and the Pinellas Trail. o Providing amenities such as seating and/or bike racks. Inappropriate: G Properties located adjacent to the Pinellas Trail that do not acknowledge it through the use of connecting pedestrian paths, doors, windows, art, etc. E. Utility/Infrastructure Facilities Appropriate: o Utility/Infrastructure facilities which visually relate to surrounding buildings and the desired character of the area with regard to mass, scale, height, width and depth consistent with the New Construction chapter of these guidelines. o Utility/Infrastructure facilities that incorporate an architectural style or architectural elements consistent with the existing and/ or desired style of development in the surrounding neighborhood consistent with the New Construction chapter of these guidelines. o Utility/Infrastructure facilities that maintain the existing and/or desired window pattern and proportions through the use of windows or window-like architectural details (faux windows, recesses, glass block, tile, shutters, trompe Foeil or other architectural techniques) and/or other architectural elements. o The use of awnings, canopies and sunscreens. o Doors that enhance and support the architectural style of the building and are appropriately sized for the scale of the building facade. Inappropriate: o Utility/Infrastructure facilities which do not relate to the surrounding or desired and envisioned context and fabric of the neighborhood with regard to size, scale, height, width and depth. o Facades on Utility/Infrastructure facilities that do not incorporate meaningful architectural details such as cornice lines, banding, string courses, columns, recesses, relief, etc. o Walls without windows or window-like architectural details along street frontages or parking areas. Case: DRC: CDB: Yes No r7 1 r, r 1`" f7 r7i 1 1 T` 1 1W? N/A C 17 17 r r- C. l? C I 1 l < 1W. J7 r r1 t r r )- 1 1 23 F 1 r 1 0 Address: • • The use of conflicting window types or window-like architectural details on the same structure. • Reflective glass and/or glass curtain walls. • Blackened out/painted windows. • Boarded up windows (except during construction or during a reasonable repair period or subsequent to a weather advisory). • Doors which are out of scale and/or character with the rest of the building. • Doors which do not enhance the architectural style of the building. • More than one style of door per building. F. Corporate Design Appropriate: • Buildings which meet all the requirements of these Guidelines as outlined in New Construction, Rehabilitation of Designated Historic Structures and this chapter, as applicable. • Corporate design which visually relates to surrounding buildings and the desired character of the area with regard to mass, scale, height, width and depth consistent with the New Construction chapter of these guidelines. • Corporate design that incorporates. an architectural style or architectural elements consistent with the existing and/or desired style of development in the surrounding neighborhood consistent with the New Construction chapter of these guidelines. Inappropriate: • Buildings which house corporate franchises or businesses which do not relate to the existing and/or desired character of the surrounding neighborhood with regard to mass, scale, height, width and depth and/or are otherwise inconsistent with the New Construction chapter of these guidelines. Case Number: FLD2005-06058 -- 1242 CLEVELAND ST 10:20 am Owner(s): Raim Tzekas 255 Bayside Dr Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Jaycee Roth 330 Duncan Loop E Dunedin, F134698 TELEPHONE: 727-459-4400, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: jaycee5552002@yahoo.com Location: Atlas Page: 287B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Proposed Use: Animal grooming and boarding Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1) No Issues. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: ?,' ,? ?rJ"'" Q??? No Comments Harbor Master: ?J No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . Tree survey required, with canopies, of all trees on and within 25' of the property line. Additional comments may be forthcoming once received and assessted. Provide prior to CDB. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - conversion of existing restaurant into pet center - installation of fence Stormwater: 1 . No Issues Solid Waste: 1 . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 15 1 . Show City standard' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the drivewayand intersection of S.R. 60/Lincoln Avenue. (City's Community Development Code., Section 3-904) 2. Driveways do not meet the connection spacing requirements of Community Development Code Seceion 3-102.D.1. Eliminate eastern driveway on Cleveland Street and install sidewalk and landscaping. 3. Show dimensions of all driveways, drive aisles and parking stalls. 4. Provide handicap parking space near accessible entrance. 5. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118) 6. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 1. 1, Section 11-4.3.2. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. Planning: No Comments Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 16 9:02 am Case Number: FLD2005-06058 -- 1242 CLEVELAND ST Owner(s): Raim Tzekas 255 Bayside Dr Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Jaycee Roth 330 Duncan Loop E Dunedin, Fl 34698 TELEPHONE: 727-459-4400, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: jaycee5552002@yahoo.com Location: Atlas Page: 287B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: //LL JAJ R9( 4,,4.TT Proposed Use: Animal grooming and boarding Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: A 4d General Engineering: 1 . 1) No Issues. Environmental: 1 , No Issues Fire: No Comments ? 'n ?'r 1 C ,_ 1 Harbor Master: ? (r V 1 Q ICJ No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - conversion of existing restaurant into pet center - installation of fence Stormwater: No Comments Solid Waste: 1 . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Traffic Engineering: Y Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 9 • 0 Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and access points. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 2. Show dimensions of all driveways, drive aisles and parking stalls. 3. Provide required number of disabled parking spaces compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.1.2. 4. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118) 5. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section I1-4.6.2. 6. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Notes: Planning: No Comments Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 10 7 Clearwater Zoning Explorer provided by The City of Clearwater - 3 I I A - Microsoft Internet Back Locate Help . Exit Codes 'Meal°nater Zoning v, , 17 ,.. +_ + ? + + ?1N Layers i? n l r'?, ?..; rn • ?. Q - - w ? • p ¦ ,? L? msiblekbve l` '^a ?? g. . ¦, ? L?1Di? ?' }?. ? # z w n o51Ft } p? ,?w Parcel o. Information DREW a .,a Streets Mii a r- C Parcels ?. .•?.. Q C 0 Future Land Use + +. + - ?? ? ? ? ? ? ?: u,, y { 0 Zoning I Pinellas Cou GROVE GROVE_ Uj U. Aerial Photo • ? s 11 40 A • 24" L, E "L- I _j C:LEVELANO r RefreshM.pA&.deally va « • ?r? i C7 * ? r ¦ ? c + ¦ _ ` ¦ - J?? PARK , PARK ? 4F ? • i ? -. ? i f + • .? 4 ... ? • • ? 4 t i. PIERCE--'z PIERCE Legend DR t` ?i +? ¦ « r •' v ; P1 Ittt??r,? air?n + s ? ? ? u . ` + ¦ ? M k !j t a ?i ti:. a ? ? 46 Parcels ' • ( ``? ¦ Z • rj4+lrr • . r • ' ? HEAR + r ? •nang • F I ¦ ? + ..._._ __... ,1. ( FRANKLIN Il - _. -__._ ._..... a a + I ? O LOR El DR. MDR Locate Results skµ,.."' .. -`" M __ `rot. ?.:-?....?s A?Irlress Scorel DR HP 1 '1242 CLEVELAND ST 100 M+ Click on a number to locate the address on the ma Then T 21608 CLEVELAND ST 62 p' 3 1100 CLEVELAND ST 82 press on the toolbar. Click on the marked parcel to see Parcel 94 1261 CLEVELAND ST62 and Flood Hazard Information.. ? v y ?? 11 Scale; 1,5,617 tr13p: 24412,86, 1.j30425,E'1 Imave; ?, 438 [ Local intranet F, ' IASLart ?W^ ¦ ". ]Gky of iearavater Gig Ap... Clearwater honing 8:09 AM 9.02 am Case Number: FLD2005-06058 -- 1242 CLEVELAND ST Owner(s): Raim Tzekas 255 Bayside Dr Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Jaycee Roth 330 Duncan Loop E Dunedin, Fl 34698 TELEPHONE: 727-459-4400, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: jaycee5552002@yahoo.com Location: Atlas Page: 287B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Proposed Use: Animal grooming and boarding Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I . 1) No Issues. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I , No Issues Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: I . Tree survey required, additional comments may be forthcoming once recieved and assessted. Provide prior to CDB. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: I . No issues - conversion of existing restaurant into pet center - installation of fence Stormwater: 1 . No Issues Solid Waste: I . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be brought up to City specifications. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 9 Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and access points. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 2. Show dimensions of all driveways, drive aisles and parking stalls. 3. Provide required number of disabled parking spaces compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.1.2. 4. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118) 5. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. 5. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Notes: Planning: No Comments Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 10 'Clearwater July 08, 2005 Shaw & Associates 200 2nd Avenue # 462 St Petersburg, F133701 • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MY C LEARWATER. C OM RE: FLD2005-06058 -- 1242 CLEVELAND ST -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Shaw & Associates : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-06058. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. I . Revise your request to only include: Pet grooming, Outdoor Training, Pet Walking, Indoor Boarding in conjunction with a retail pet store (under FLS2005-06045). 2. Provide a site plan, a site data table, a tree survey, location map, landscape plan, building elevations (all four sides), and survey. (15 total sets need to be resubmitted) 3. The affidavit of authorization has not been completed. Fill in the missing information. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Tuesday, July 12, 2005 (4:30 p.m.). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 4" J Schodtler Planner I Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-06058 - 1242 CLEVELAND ST CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September 20, 2005, beginning at 10:00 a.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (reconsidered from 07/19/05) The City of Clearwater is requesting reconsideration of the attached sign approved through the Comprehensive Sign Program application contained within the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application that approved a problematic use for Amscot Financial in this location. [Proposed Use: Problematic Use (Amscot)] at 1874 North Highland Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 32.08. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-01004 2. Ardent International LLC., Panaviotis and Helen Vasiloudes (M3B Development LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade & 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lots 1 & 3 and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 3. Raim & Xheziie Tzekas [A Very Important Pet (AVID) Salon] are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow pet grooming and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store and to permit a 6-ft tall fence located in front of the building (approximately 5 ft back from the N Lincoln Ave frontage), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Pet Grooming/Outdoor Training Facility) at 1242 Cleveland St, Padgett's Estates Sub, Lot 3 and parts of Lots 2 & 4. Assigned Planner: 017 ZaShgdtler, P1ah-Aer 1. FLD2005-06058 4. Harborside Condo LLC (Mark Newkirk) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (16 existing attached dwelling units; 15 attached dwelling units proposed, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 15 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 12.4 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.3 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 4.3 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.8 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 87.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.67 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.13. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 706 Bayway Blvd, Bel Crest Condo, Units 1-12 & 14-17. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07070 0 5. K&P Clearwater Estate H LLC (Mark International LLC, Sunrise on the Beach Inc) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 90 ft along Coronado Dr and Hamden Dr, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.5 ft (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.13. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 229 Coronado Dr, Columbia Sub Replat, parts of Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07061 6. LOPA LLC (Patricia A. Bilotta & Lorri S. Ritter) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 3 attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 14 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to building) and a reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit (5 spaces) to 1.33 spaces per dwelling units (4 spaces), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.17, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to zero ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 1254 Grove St, Property of AJ Moore, Lots 14 & 15. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05042 7. Coates I, Inc. is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6409; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 9 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 621 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay unit No 5 Replat, Blk 78, Lots 5 & 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07064 8. Jerry & Teresa Tas are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 20 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6409; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 18 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 14.94 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 14.88 (to building/pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 67.5 ft along Coronado Dr and to 71.64 ft along Hamden Dr as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C.. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 342 Hamden Dr, Columbia Sub No 2, Blk A, Lot 11 & part of Lot 10, and Columbia Sub No 3, Lot 7 & part of Lot 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07066 9. Hess Properties II LLC, and Bay Esplanade Properties LLC (Stephen T Hess) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (15 existing overnight 0 accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 8 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) at 64 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 21 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 51.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 0 ft (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 64 & 566 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 79, Lots 3, 18 & 19 (less R/W for Clearwater St), and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner 111. FLD2005-07065 10. Seawake Motel Ltd (Enchantment, LLC) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 7 ft (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 15.7 ft ( to sidewalk) and from 20 ft to 14 ft (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 150 ft (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of 3 dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Dr, 4 dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Dr and 1 dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 691 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 16-19 & Rip Rts & land on S of Lot 19. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 11. Clearwater Grande Dev LLC (Steve J Page) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 6.3 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 17.6 ft (to open stairs) and from 20 ft to 8.8 ft (to pool deck), an increase to the building ht from 35 ft to 99.5 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 645-655 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07072 12. Canterbury Property Mgt Inc, TLS Holdings Inc, Dorothy C Boldol! Tre, and Canterbury Oaks Inc are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Blvd) setback from 15 ft to 5.45 ft (to building), from 15 ft to zero ft (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth St.) setback from 15 ft to 3.63 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Dr) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a • 0 reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 401, 411, & 421 S Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub Lots 72-77, 121-122, 124, 128-129 & parts of Lots 123 & 127. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07068 13. KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east)setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off- street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 and 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 14. Parkdale LLC (Belleair Harbor, LLC, Maria Nikolova) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 sq ft to 8,171 sq ft, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 ft to 60 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C, and preliminary plat approval for 2 lots. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (2 units)] at 475 East Shore Dr, Clearwater Beach Park 15L Add Replat Blk C, Lot 5 & Sub Land. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06056 15. Homeless Emergency Proiect is requesting Flexible Development application to permit the redevelopment and expansion of an existing residential shelter (including the expansion of the kitchen and dining area), in the Commercial District, to maintain the existing front, side and rear setbacks with the exception of a front (south) setback of 4 ft (to dumpster enclosure), and to permit off site parking, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of 0 Sec 2-704.C and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 18 units) at 1200 Betty Ln, Fair Burn Add Blk C, Lots 7- 9. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07063 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that parry status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 5624567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 09/04/05 0 Date: September 20 , 2005 Case Number: FLD2005-06058 Owner/Applicant: A Very Important Pet, Ms. Jaycee Roth. Address: 1242 Cleveland Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: • REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to allow grooming, and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store. The request includes a six-foot tall fence to be located in front of the building approximately five feet back from the North Lincoln Avenue frontage, per Sections 2-903.C. EXISTING ZONING / LAND USE: Downtown District (D); Central Business District Classification (CBD). CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CHARACTER DISTRICT: East Gateway. PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Restaurant Proposed Use: Animal Grooming and Outdoor Training Facility, in conjunction with a Retail Pet Store. ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USE: North: Downtown District - Parking Lot South: Downtown District - Restaurant East: Downtown District - Overnight Accomodations West: Downtown District - Retail Sales/ Service ANALYSIS: Site Location, Existing Conditions and History: The site is 0.48 acres located at the north-west corner of the intersection of Cleveland Street and Lincoln Avenue. It is a corner lot with frontage along Cleveland Street and Lincoln Avenue (south and east, respectively) and has been developed with a 3,200 square foot, one-story building constructed in 1948 and a 28-space parking lot. Two driveways currently provide access to the site along the front (south) of the site along Cleveland Street and back out parking exists along the front (east) of the site along Lincoln Street. The existing building was renovated and painted in 2001 and will remain unchanged with regards to the exterior. The parking lot will be completely redeveloped with this proposal. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 - Case FLD2005-06058 - Page 1 0 0 The Flexible Development approval is to allow grooming, and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store. The request includes a six-foot tall fence to be located in front of the building approximately five feet back from the North Lincoln Avenue frontage, per Sections 2- 903.C. Proposal: The proposed "A Very Important Pet" center is primarily designed to support the needs of citizens of Clearwater that own canines (dogs). The proposed business estimates that the center will offer the owners of the 58,000 dogs located in the city limits of Clearwater a much needed range of services tailored to their pets needs. The proposal includes a mixed-use development including a 300 square foot area for retail sales of pet supplies, a 1,000 square foot doggie daycare area, a 550 square foot animal grooming area, a 400 square foot area for the baking of animal biscuits to be sold in the store, and an approximately 6,500 square foot outdoor training area. The majority of the business is retail-like operation and will primarily take place within the building. The retail sales, pet daycare, and baking facilities were approved at the August 4th, 2005 Development Review Committee meeting, under FLS2005-06045. The proposed hours of operation for the entire facility are 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m and in addition all pets will be required to be inside the building by 7:30 p.m. A six-foot tall white PVC fence will enclose the outdoor training area and landscaping is to be installed to assist in reducing any noise caused during the training sessions. The existing parking lot will be reduced in size and reconfigured to allow for the proposed 6,500 square foot outdoor training area and will create a parking area and driveways that are functionally integrated into the design of the proposed development as much as possible without the complete removal of the building. The existing 28 parking spaces will be reduced to 15 spaces; this exceeds the retail sales/service use requirement of two to four parking spaces per one thousand square feet of gross floor area. The existing eastern driveway located along Cleveland Street will be removed with this proposal and one, two-way driveway will be located from Cleveland Street to provide access to the site and building, as well as from Lincoln Avenue. This will limit the number of curb cuts to the interior of the site and still provide adequate access to the site. The site landscaping has been found to be acceptable with regards to the design layout. Specific plant materials and irrigation will be conditioned to the development order for further staff review and approval at time of building/construction permit. Solid waste services will be provided via a rollout dumpster at the east side of the site along Lincoln Avenue. The City's Traffic Engineer has found that the submitted site plan improves the traffic flow compared to the originally approved plan. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 - Case FLD2005-06058 - Page 2 Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: The site is located within the East Gateway character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. This area is recognized as the area of Downtown Clearwater experiencing the most economic and geographic struggles. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan recommends that this area be redeveloped with a mix of residential and non-residential uses. Specifically, it recommends the redevelopment of the East Gateway as a vibrant, stable, diverse neighborhood defined by its unique cultural base and mixed land uses. It also recommends that the area continue to be developed as a low and medium density residential neighborhood supported with neighborhood commercial and professional offices concentrated along the major corridors of Cleveland Street. Permitted uses in the area include a variety of nonresidential establishments such as office, retail sales and service, restaurant, governmental uses, etc. This strategy has been identified as a way to stimulate the redevelopment of property in the area and to enhance the primary entrance to the Downtown Core now that the new Memorial Causeway Bridge has opened. According to the Downtown Design Guidelines this should assist in repositioning the Downtown as a viable economic entity in the region. The City Commission adopted the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan on September 18, 2003. The final amended document was reviewed and approved by the City Commission on December 4, 2003. The Board of County Commissioners subsequently approved the Plan on December 16, 2003. The Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) approved the Plan in January 2004 followed by an approval by the Countywide Planning Authority (CPA) in February 2004. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes criteria against which proposals to be located within the Plan boundaries are measured and are discussed further in this report. This proposal is consistent with the Plan. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan including: 1. Goal l: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. This project will provide an opportunity for employment, recreation, and shopping destination to those who are pet owners. It should attract citizens as well as tourist traveling abroad with pets. 2. Objective 1F: Cleveland Street shall be maintained as Downtown's Main Street, which is valued both for its historic character and scale of development and for its function as the major retail street. The proposed retail business will maintain the historic character, scale, and function of retail sales and service businesses located on Cleveland Street. 3. Objective 1L: The City shall recognize the unique features of Downtown neighborhoods and continue and expand applicable neighborhood services. The proposed business, A Very Important Pet, should provide a minimum amount of employment opportunity as well Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 - Case FLD2005-06058 - Page 3 • as serve the daily commercial and personal service needs of the pet owners in the neighborhood. The proposal is also consistent with East Gateway character district Policies including: 1. Policy 7: Attract and assist existing retail and personal service establishments in order to create neighborhood employment opportunities. The proposed business, A Very Important Pet, should provide a minimum amount of employment opportunity. 2. Policy 9: Evaluate limited expansions of the Commercial and Downtown zoning District boundaries on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Cleveland Street that may create opportunities for commercial expansions and/or redevelopment that is consistent with Community Development Code requirements. The redevelopment of this existing restaurant that has been vacant for more than two years into a daily commercial/personal service business should enhance the immediate area and influence redevelopment in the area along Cleveland Street. The proposal is in compliance with the Downtown zoning district code as well as the Downtown design guidelines. 3. Policy 12: Encourage the adaptive re-use of underutilized buildings in the event redevelopment is not feasible. The redevelopment of this existing restaurant that has been vacant for more than two years into a daily commercial/personal service business is an adaptive re-use of an underutilized building. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and Code Section 2-903): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT Lot area (N/A) 20,889 square feet X] [ ] Lot width (N/A) 169 feet (Cleveland) XI [ ] 121 feet (Lincoln) Parking spaces Retail: 15 spaces X [ ] COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Code Section 2-903.C): Consistent Inconsistent The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for 1. development is otherwise impractical without deviations from 1XI the use, intensity and development standards. 2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the 1XI fair market value of abutting properties. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 - Case FLD2005-06058 - Page 4 Consistent Inconsistent 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment [X] [ ] Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill [X] [ ] Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the [X] [ ] immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill 6 Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of [X] [ ] the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and 7. off-Avenue parking are justified by the benefits to community [X] [ ] character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according 8. to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be [X] [ ] available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District [X] [ ] design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS (Code Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1 Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, [X] [ ] bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use 2. of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value [x] [ ] thereof. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 - Case FLD2005-06058 - Page 5 0 • Consistent Inconsistent Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of 3. persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the 1XI [ ] proposed use. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 1XI [ ] 5 Development is consistent with the community character of the [X] [ ] immediate vicinity. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, 6. including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation [x] [ ] impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 4, 2005. The applicant has diligently worked with staff over the past month to provide an attractive, well-designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development will further the City's goals of improving the character of the area. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to allow grooming, and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store. The request includes a six-foot tall fence to be located in front of the building approximately five feet back from the North Lincoln Avenue frontage, per Sections 2-903.C. with the following recommended findings of fact, recommended conclusions of law and conditions of approval: Recommended Findings of Fact: 1. The subject property totals 20,889 square feet (0.48 acres) and is approximately 169 feet wide; 2. The subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) future land use plan classification; 3. The development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as it is located within the East Gateway character district; 4. The proposed development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; and 5. The proposed development's hours of operation will be limited to 7:30 p.m. for outdoor animal uses. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 - Case FLD2005-06058 - Page 6 0 1. The development proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehen- sive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.C; 2. The development proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The development proposal is in compliance with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the East Gateway character district; 4. The development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. The development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; * 2. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That a final landscape be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and attached signs be limited to canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; Prepared by Planning Department Staff: D016?\ (# in Schodtler, Planner I ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBICIeveland St 1242 - A Very Important Pet - 9.20.05 CDB - JVSICIeveland 1242 Sta/fReport. doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 - Case FLD2005-06058 - Page 7 0 BIOWfLL =? ? DR r PINEBROOK OR 40 B SALLE ST. Q p j a a 7 O?-_Jw LUFF ST O PALM BLUFF ST PALM BLUFF ST > > ¢ d J EN O LASALLE ? ? CEDAR ADMIRAL WOODSON LA o. i??w W? w N HIBISCUS HIBISCUS STY® ~ ;. O? P o ^ao METTO CEDAR METTO S HIBIS CUS Q ST NICHOLSO NICHOLSON ST _ WALNUT _ a ? E] SEMINOLE ST a? ? ?a?? U ELDRIDG = ST ELDRIDGE Ir ELMW?O-OD I L? O ? SMALL 3 WJ? ROSE 'NfR p ST w ®w O MAPLE ST ? MAPLE MAPLE LEE T ST Q MAPLE RD ? ST ? oO ¢ < PLAZA < a ¢ a a cccGNRANDA RID?DS m HART ST HART JACKSON RD FOREST RD a PINEWOOD D 0o oo ??? ? _? _ ~ H CIR Q L Z a O N = O ST 0 y O U 3 CRESNIEW ST (9 OAKWOOD O ? ® ? _ ? WOOD ? ROSE DREW ST S.R 690 E -0 ?0? ¢ ?¢ g?¢GROV= S?O % ?bwma?p g a a a ?o?¢? k MENDRICKS? ? ? '`' /?-?J ? ?c9? ? ? W GROVE Ov GROVE ST 3 ^\ I ? O II ?I ?3? L--J ? ? ?S? N.E. ?? ?LAURA S.R 60 CLEVELAND ST <? ? C?u? CLEVELAND PARK ? a ' ONO ? <? PA ST PARK ST T a ? ? ? FRANKLIN a® PIERCE T ? ? ST cm 0 S PIERCE O PIERCE ST Y ZO ST '?\ rc w ?K`a6 Eregnan ?u ST T Q?OW < F RANKLIN CO T ? 7 1 , ^ ??a COURT Q 3 E GOULD ST PROJECT DE LEON ST SITE ? 1 ? N JUAN CT OCGO BROWNELL S= I ?A ROSA [S CHESTNUT ST COURT ST u ? ? ?' ROGERS ST TURNER ST ?Q? COURT S.R 6 GULF TO BAY BLVD = = Q ROGERS ST Q ? ?¢? 3 IwaGln PINE ST UIDRD ? ? INE ST Ti PINE m 8?? ? PINE s a 5 33 U 00 El DRUI D •?a?? < a z w TURNER O ST ? ? ?? w ? 00 ?O ? Fr- PINE 1W L? z,L? ? 6 r7i' I ?? ? z . o WA JASMINE WAY a JASMINE WAY JASMINE WA q D ti a mA DR 0 MAGNOLIA y ? a ¢ ¢ MAGNOLIA DR ? ? ? y DR q$ Z MAGNO N < LOTUS PATH LOTUS PATH ?u LOTUS PATH Location Map Owner: Raim Tzekas Case: FLD2005-06058 Site: 1242 Cleveland Street Property Size(Acres): 0.48 PIN: 15-29-15-65268-000-0030 Atlas Page: 287B 124 N 1 1113 I I " x.15 I I r-N----------i j I I I I 1111r L1 t J I __ IfOtJ• r 1--114 1107 11 I1 1 I?6f- 1 j I 1 1 -r 1 1 1 I 1 ? 1 1 I L_------ ---- L-- - -------- <t -i _ 1 ^j?l N _ _ Ll t - CLEVELAND ST Li 1 ' 1 1 - I ? _ Ji ; Q &iii Sale & Service j O a o 0 0 ??r.w ?? Z " '- ^ w N ANN ? w ?' ca w N r o ------------- V f - ti 1 5 I 117 116 ff7 115 i15 L 113 1 - ? i 1-, 1 17,b?o 1 iJ -_! -, 11 N N w N it J J ? ?- I I-- F ---- I -- j r----- 1 I Li ; ehiiiht -- _ _ ' 4m+ a0an:, 1263 J PARK ST k m b ^ T7-- z I I L I_ . 1 u 1y ----------- ----r IL ?LI PIERCE ST PIERCE ST Existing Use Map Owner: Raim Tzekas Case: FLD2005-06058 Site: 1242 Cleveland Street Property 0.48 Size(Acres): PIN: 15-29-15-65268-000-0030 Atlas Page: 287B • • 11f3 I I I r-8 r-G----------?1 ? I I 1NN 1__J . I W rtr>'?^ r 1__x.14 Q jlo7jl? ?j ? I I j l 'y ?¦ I " ? O ---r I I J L I( j l \ L-----------? L------- y LJ ,-?--^Q NNr I N I k-.' t[?y N m -- U 1 Z GROVE ST 17 N N N X; I NN N N N l 11 z N?i y + N N CLEVELAND ST 1,31 1 I AI ! ------_ Q i_I ` V ~p ? Q ? ? ^ t7 'O A Oi ??y h N ^ wNN cy ? - e qq y ------ ----- -- 1 i 1 y l 5 1 1 I ? 7 ------ 119 116 W ' ? -- ? I N I 7f3-? I ' 2 I I i + f ? 1y f1 I 1 I I I ? ___ l I 1 I 117 117 j 4 I I J `---1 I Q 115 IJ 115 L 0 113 1-- --?? Q 1 I __! - r I X 1 0 0 111 LJ _-? 1 --- 1 0a1 1 ?- 3 1 ? ---, ? 'I --- V 1 1 1 W ? , { 'P' '?--' : z ?_ -- -I - Y i _` ? I r jN l? . j I ' a-? 4 H ` _ _. 14 A L I J I I 1 1+ 1? S- 1 1 1 I , ? _ 1 1 1 11 L! I 1 1 r-1 l I I I 1 LJ _ I I I l 1 I N ^I _J b +D ? N r----T ? -- A I a I I l ? ? ? ?---J } 851 I--- I I I I I I I I I I 20 N o 1 1: 1 Ri ? 2 ? 12 1283 ?- j l r r 100 12 12 2 1 I I ?- I_r ?N V„ ' N N PI T N I .u* I rn 1707 Ila ?c Irk Zoning Map Owner. I Raim Tzekas I Case: FLD2005-06058 Site: 1242 Cleveland Street Property 0.48 Size(Acres): PIN: 15-29-15-65268-000-0030 Atlas Page: 287B J I I w m I °p W ?- M Aftm Owner. Raim Tzekas Case: FLD2005-06058 Site: I 1242 Cleveland Street I Property Size(Acres): PIN Atlas Page: 0.48 15-29-15-65268-000-0030 2876 0 NNW WWM Office to the South-East ',. 1 ?,.. ?.I•' Vi'i' Overnight Accommodations to the East. 1242 Cleveland Street FLD2005-06045 IL. 0 k i Retail Sales/Restaurant to the South-west. y. .1 .'g F Y.: T NOW Retail Sales to the west. ?ti uo. Page 2 Retail Sales to the west. X Nib, ari Adjacent parking lot to the North. 1242 Cleveland Street FLD2005-06045 1 Page I Subject Property - South Elevation. Non-conforming freestanding sign. Subject Property - South-west Elevation. _ `Vk Single and Multi Family Residential to the Nor th. - FCM • 4"k 4" f) M* F_ CORMIEP, ` T 1 W R.1.1. PAOG£T Y S F SU6DlVISION ALSO ^ LFGAL _r 7 BEING IrwC S.E. in `- . CORNER OF LOT 24, I-/ E SC ?y d P tomen T'Y OF O . !:ET C 0• q. J. MOORE, P. 13. 12, VAOGET N N P6. 24. 0) Y A HEC PitlELL -3 = >t J in O SURVO G a 0 'L'o iu 6i N e D i.. OEI OF- O F)KCs/45") g - r OUl P/C 0.4 NORTH BENT) Z ( ' 7 7 ` As: TH .? FIR C3/ a") / 1.G• EAST Q[[]] C QQ? , I(O]? S o I,E ' CLF 0"(p) C 20 9 NORTH rri?pp l\ F/C 0. 10 203.« ,CF+ 0.40•WEST- W . NO 140 3. NO ' " S7 JV J . . . Lki 4. DI s n{ ,500 ?-605 E \ _ yv METED a P 54 10.66 (F) N8 °59"33"E 40 1 3 (F - L L 0 11.0"CP) 40.0 CP) " 31.0• NO qc CEgS la U O J 5 G 1 - 51 RC a, Rc We, ) W . 12 E/P ... V 0 EuRvcl- R•5 it N Q.O 1.1 WEST 40 FT. LOT 4 0 2 o- C/o ! u d F OF v u JI Q r: f?EMoVE ASP14AL-' 26 1 Z Q . su1:vL J 6) Q INSTAI.L. So> / ONE STORY' SflRutas 0 13: Fn Hts>c W n MASONRY ZG.8 --- ' ; ' ? H . hi . O.S. CLEAF( v r' FENCE J ? 4.Cc 6 WHITE PVC J i .nl: ? 61 WNIT<r PVC L FJP i 8 z. 14 O ?? !lr IJScAP r Ca ONE STORY- Z 3 4 S $ _N i 9j la II ! SuHVI MASON RY 41.2 PLAN R \ ,- R ED LL/ COVE ENTRANCE -? ;..1 W CM\I E,P 2 4 ° o LOT 3 II ' tV G C^ , I ? , ' W LOT 7 t- FN D. X-CUT z 1 ?! _ __. _. .. ._ __ _.. I OF 6LK. t9ROKEN BLDG. COR• ' ? 4U I2. 3 i l - ,• . ? - In7,-i( Ng1L 0. Q, CLEA>Z 40 . T R L \ . o°"`' S/"/ ' " ' S 00"00 " E J I s 00 CFA 169 'Q'>L P:. r E/P 169,-0 .. n ccr, 0 `590°00 E 203.07 C 0 f : .. ?•? 203.0 (p) - F?° 4b f 4s ^ _40 S5- c(P \VTR .'Colic Jr) Ru ?S ? I S m1w . f ' STORM _ C•Q. \ 2 CURB GUTTf.FZ ..." • M.H. O /:oNC. GJ U -- ? G r GG i ?C G. 1 . i ?- (L /.. 0 0 LAr?A5U4PI NCn Gr?ruExa.Cn 3c"IfWHEAGHT) r. r-I cl,rl n nln c -rPP PT crcpuA\T PAVEMENT August 11, 2005 To: The City of Clearwater Planning Development From: A Very Important Pet Center 1242 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Florida 33761 Case # FLD2005-06058 Response: 1. Hours of operation are currently set for: A. Open for drop off at front door 6:00 A.M. B. Close the evening at 9:00 P.M. May not pick up dogs after that time. C. Dogs must be inside building by 7:30 P.M. 2. How much area to be used business: A. 300 Sq. Ft. Retail area B. 550 Sq. Ft. Grooming Area C. 400 Sq. Ft. Baking Area D. 1000 Sq. Ft. Cageless dog area 3. How is this proposal characteristic of the adjacent properties: A. The landscaping will be in compliance and give a clean and well- maintained appearance. B. The building to the west is only the block side facing the AVID. C. The Building to the East is across the street with street noise on both the west side and the south side. It is a motel that the center would have no impact. It would provide anyone staying at the motel a place for their dogs to stay when they are away from their room. D. The Building on the south side of the street has no affect it is across Cleveland Street. E. Area to the north is a vacant lot that is approximately 100 ft from the 6 ft fence in the back of AVIP center. This has very little impact on this area due to the distance from the commercial area of the center with a commercial vacant lot between. I feel this has less impact on the area than a restaurant that is open much later in the evenings. Noise with trash bins in the back and cars coming and going. This area is fenced and dogs will be in by 7:30. F. This center will support the needs of the community in many ways. There are over 58,000 dogs in Clearwater. Just 10 years ago there was only about 38,000 dogs in Clearwater. It is growing and people are becoming more and more attached to their canine companions. We are short on evacuation centers according to the SPCA. This will give the local . 6 0 0 residents a security. I have been told it is not in a flood zone. Most of the boarding facilities in Clearwater are cages and lock up the dog until the owner comes back to pick them up. I am offering a much more friendly and healthy atmosphere. All dogs will get basic training and attention. This is exactly what the City of Clearwater needs for so many residents coming to the area that will be bringing even more canines. I have the talent and the passion to work with these dogs. My goal is to have an establishment that the city of Clearwater can count on. In cases of emergencies AVID will pick up the dog and take it to the center so it is not unattended or left alone in times of desperation. With the 6' fence surrounding the outside area should create low impact on the area and enhance it's charm. The majority of the customers will be picking up or dropping off which again is much lower impact than a restaurant. I want to work with the City of Clearwater in every way to bring good things to the area and make us all proud. 4. This business will not hinder businesses.in the area. It will be a training facility for residents and their dogs. It will be educational center that will bring more balanced family pets. I will have employment opportunities for the area. The distance of the homes with another commercial property between would not create any impact on any homes in the area. It is mostly a commercial area. 5. The estimate to develop this building and lot is about $30,000, not including the interior. 6. Guideline checklist. 0 0 FLD2005-06058 1242 Cleveland Street 7/28/2005 • South Elevation. iJ :• Y,lt? Jf ? 5 q?. • Y L 17 • 1;7 - MAL r .? NNW, South-east elevation. i ate • 0 ...*A 664Z i East Elevation. • Witt ;I i :?, iii Single Family and Multi Family I E Residential to the North. - - t' Ank, 0 I# East Elevation Along Rear Property Line. • c ' ?[ a 91{ Ox 'sa.. 1•c -°t?. ?, : s..lh, M'.+Il..? 55ff -4?-* .s h. S ?, +?, a.w.+w.d2iw.li??Yr#Y?. +is?•?P;t Tiqli ww r "ir ? W Y - ? ? ?:??r??'`?' ? .y.'sy„ ?° ,irr-??Y...-.:°+-. "h...-:.?d''J"+';e?'?' .+i4: ti1t Adjacent parking lot to the North. Adjacent parking lot to the North. Single Family Residential to the North. • r Office to the South-east. South-west elevation. • • Ll? 1 Non-conforming freestanding sign. Retail Sales/Restaurant to the South- west. 0 • 7 aN u u Ia ay Retail Sales to the west. Retail Sales to the west. • Retail Sales to the west. i FLD2005-06058 1242 C leN eland Street 7/28/2005 • South Elevation Southeast elevation East Elevation along Rear Property Lune East Elevation Adjacent parking lot to the North • • fi West elevation and parking lot. ."i r?-----4 _. err-?'.#" ? VIC 7 Overnight Accomodations to the East. • _-1 jacent l,ul:uig lot to the Noidi Single Faimh Residential to the Notlh OtLce to tile Sxltk-e.Ist 9 Sugle Rim& mid hlnlh Fuuh- Resi dentmi to the Notth Chenu¢ht Accotu A.1twns to the East South-nest elecahon 2 West elevatl yl and lvulang lot Retail Sales Restaiuatt to the South- West Retal Sales to the west Non-confonuuig fiveestatidnig sign Retail Sales to the west Retail Sales to the nest CC a ? 278A ? 2786 _279A CITY OF CLEARWATER es ref es A w R • es es 70 , 3 R(p4 AND VICDTD Y SR. 190 R 77m-uee ° AI ?` + PIN191AS COUNTY. FLORIDA PREPARED BY m Is 4R ' II! I < ~ II IlliD 12 a, n9 n?l rot 8E & R I 1 R $ 5 Eli r g e F I L My W RIDGE CO-OP UNREC © 0 A7 w t @ In • a w OREM j sp T T x R PUBllC NONISTRATION ENGINEERING In ??Watt S 4 § N y i 4 2 1 2 1 a 0. OOg O 3 2 1 m q p?O n e l A 1` @ aCa II 3 4 1 2 3 1 6 0 1 L ` '1 100 S ,,,,. Ave, Ck"fifiv, rL 33756 Pn.: (613)567-1730. rar. (8,3)526-1735 n11 -fI / l F / Il " '• 77 may/ 3 r.1 /n g rot 7 rtt IA ?E i 7 E e< u IN T 1 eanvo p er ._ eng en n•c + + In r r M 4 s /0 4 In 9 No B 5 5 /n 6 1 DlsNoimer: /n I S no e Ha 6 O? 3 ,a furn ed i City of - information data Clearwater Ilr 40 Ie 10 11 g t1 gin ce "I w orks Add ilitira tbn/Engtneeino must be be p y o a M n+ n 6 o B 13 12 7 7 pp th used by the lne rec and ufed by reclpknt with the understanding erstondNq Inot the data and 9 III 7 IN fall 1 No B I e hod 'v 2 „ W H 4 , received was collected for the purpose or d-ping o graphic Wrostmetura Ineenley As such the Cit of Clearwater PWA/E me Ip I Q, 11 15 No 81 /02 @) . , y no womanlW sxprosed or ImpdeO conarrnln9q me rob t2 11 ror g s0 r 9 s 17 16 p+ ro4 9 9 9 II S 5 , . accuracy, eemoletenaa rNlpbnBY. a sullabMfy of tnla data ror OF LZy 9 , t8 roo 19 A at Oii 10 10 Ir Sr any eU« parlkulor use. tunnrrmare, the CBy of aeorwoter vwA/E assumes no liability whatsoever associated with the use 10 11 °x !! g 2 a 10 ++ 4 n 6 misuse or such dote. , , 2i t3Y 10 1 11 n of 11 I R 47i0VE STREET R n 3 C] m 2 20CA > 11 n T changes. r 1 ++ it 22 236 12 12 of t2 S r ii 7 This Atlas page 4 wbbj eet to perlod1c (? 6 ,3 19p 20 121 22 23 431 ZB _ e 5 31 > 4e 13 For Information about latest n-Wens pleofe can PWA/E or a.a bar web site. 2 24 q<s? 2 z is 25 z16.' , 13 11 I 14 0:6 '1, r e s -$8 T 1 Errs 7 28 27F- 1 U u N ITS 3 2 1 12 9 PAOO 9 ? - _ . R1L P 18 z I _ 11 29 zB If is Moo 4 7 r ; a . 7 7' I 20 19 1B I I 1 t t0 T o Ito I 114 3 g,$T. 4-11 u = y' _ . 1 2 3 C ?A n waA . ww 0422 K' I 8 (Sit. 60) R R CLVA AND s J ? STREET ¦ , $ R 1 8 0 iq0 2D0 400 600 VVV/ 4rjl1 _ E' 21 2T IV ..? V ?(?- -S $ A .ao $ m p ., • e°fll I g 1 22 3: SCALE: 1- 400• '?V\ 1 Ty 100 21? zs 1 • rs 11• .. 12 r ? • y ? x r ,ae',p ? 20 30 31 la C,O 1?? S W "A a 14 13 10 819 1 e LEGEND: -A- i5 16 > 11 '' t 1 e 32 32 PARK I R 7 $a 33% E?? g pr 1B 17 q R STREET R I _ . B.1' O BLOCK NUMBER J r 71 3 \ CO CO Jg3Q LOT ADDRESS 7 0 3 14 ta] 12¦ it ,0 5 4 3 2 pro 2 ?f1 D CITY LIMITS LINE 17 S ?5 MA rod 2 t°4 ?< I R $ STREET RCC 3 ga...;7..T SHADED AREA - PROPERTY ?i STREET 4 ?, 8 fi II I 24 , 4 EiS.`w:fall 1 7 rob OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS 3 : J 2 1 AI 12 A ' 4 J 2 t f ` 4 2 1 , 23 5 QC?I .ale 17 a +? 3 ra a 13 1t f0 9 6 7 g ; 4 50 °L 6 3 Hr I m A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX .?i 4 10 Ash 5 2 3 g 1B s zp 6 ?1 7 vs 22 2 ;s'll 101 3r pri 9 we /e t5 2? 26 2S 6j0 1 m ?? 17 < 21 ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY Lrj I 3 >0 ?t 6 e +p 9 d p' •2 -?0 ¢g 7 ga. 1g ?' '? ,124 t AI 6 r14 B 5 9 t0 ..8 e860 11 t2 13 o., I rra20 17 1 v +n 17 4 1 ua MDR ZONING DESIGNATION '? trod (v! 7 rn py slab eee Aj B P' 20 21 22 23y ro 3 d m 0 3 z 11 10 7 N w /9 50 !t Al $ ZONE LINE ?a t, I "` t14 E 12 A9p0y ?j 11 1z 13 R 'Po'3 j rrt R FNµ R R !? OY vee CO-OP °0 m 14 ' ._ g sA t+7 l Y W C A "`' rm +00 < 1r' 2 1 S 4 3 2 t 1e }7 1s 1 rKs"PIUM Qal ap 4 3 I 1 7 _ 1 t3 e A> 6 3 2 t 1 & t15 S y ID 17r 04/71/ae o Ao I 7 < A C !n $ @ = m 5555 0,/7f N1 eue II s 4 ie+a °3 T rg 4} 22 21 2 Lt co lize 03/05195 ao 17 s /arI d AI apt 2 20 s„ ?' 3 1/ 0am- 31 ac 1 4 8 O 837°+0/01/98 5 7p to R+ Ar 25 24 819 ST. CECELIA w 3 23 24s 2 m s 9m g 9 ° •7 ni 11 11 U t4 is "1 4° 8 4 INTERPAROCHIAL SCHOOL. Ede i 1.8 4 SI'2 a $oe SANTA $tl 12 1•+4an T 14/03 13 12 4pr 222 5 M?Tz In ro7R?A 3 n ,a° D D MARTIIVOSOCCER FlELO i¦ R IL 3? 8 7 8 5 6 3 2 1 s 1 y 13 42 40 39 38 37 4012,17e5 400 2 2 2 < 1 16 17 U sse 7n-.lo o 1d 3 $z f0 o n tftlil ps 7' 1 „ , REVISED: R R ,o 1 /19/0 Z COURT R _ R _ _ STREET _ _ R R R oe e. - R R 9 - - ZONING ATLAS 5 4 3 ijJ7 7 91711.97 9 76717 7 . A i 3 3 7 7 7 see ea..A-1 N X 296A ! NE - 1/4 Of SECTION 2 Q 7 [? V 968 297A t 15 29 s - 15 E O o Pinellas County Property Appraise T1 15 29 15 65268 000 003 Pabe 1 of 7 Appraisal.--information on Building- information Ma 0.20 mile radius Same-are gmaphic information Same area, Land Use, Property Use codes, etc. 1/8 mile aerial photo (1997) 1/8 mile aerial photo 2000 1/8 mile aerial photo (2002 View Comparable Non-Residential Sales Mass Appraisal is the systematic appraisal of groups of properties as of a given date using standardized procedures and statistical testing. Its purpose is to provide an equitable and efficient appraisal of all property in a jurisdiction for ad-valorem tax purposes. We recognize that there is a reasonable range of values within which a property can sell. Our Mass Appraisal Market Value tends toward the lower end of the range. Recent upgrades or remodeling efforts completed by a seller in order to prepare a property for sale, especially those on the interior of a building, are often not reflected in our Comparable Sales Value. Finally, our values are historical and are developed using arms length sales from the three years prior to January 1. For this reason, our values are generally lower than what a seller will ask for a property in today's appreciating market. Appraisal Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t=1 &t2=1 &t3=... 9/6/2005 Pinellas County Property Appraisenformation: 15 29 15 65268 000 003 Page 2 of 7 15 / 29 / 15 / 05208 / 000 / 0030 06-Sep-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:14:51 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales TZEKAS, RAIM OBK: 11218 OPG: 0141 TZEKAS, XHEZIJE 255 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767-2504 EVAC: Nan-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 1242 CLE VELAND ST of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 264.00 2003 2004 l f - : sa es rom 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 2 /2,001 11,2i8/ 141 350,000 (U) I 1925: Book 009 Pgs 110- 5 /1,996 9,359/1,636 1,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 8 /1,986 6,293/ 699 125,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 250,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 250,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 250,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CWD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Bey Bd View: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 5,033.57 1) 0 x 0 9.00 20, 889.00 S Special Tax CWI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 6,059.30 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 6,059.30 Short Legal PADGETT'S ESTATES SUB LOT 3 & S 11FT OF LOT 2 & Description E 59FT OF LOT 4 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-ser3?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=l &r-.2&s=3&t=1 &t2=1 &t3=... 9/6/2005 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 15 29 15 65268 000 003 Page 3 of 7 Property-and Land Use Code desqripAiious 15 / 29 / 15 / 05203 / 000 / 0030 :01 06-Sep-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:14:52 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Rest/Lounge/Drive-in Property Address: 1242 CLEUELAND ST Prop Use: 325 Land Use: 21 Structural E1?m?nts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Cone Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Gable & Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 6 Bath Tile Floor + Half Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,948 Effective Age iO Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,972 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 126 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 28 9) .00 0 4) Canopy .25 252 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C(DrnmE3r(--ial E>ctra F?atures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 4800 1.50 4,800 71200 7,200 999 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 71200 Map With 2005 Sales (Red), 2004 Sales (Green), 2003 Sales (Blue) F*- I F ?] FA C T I M I M http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t=1 &t2=1 &t3=... 9/6/2005 Pinellas,County Property Apprai0ger Information: 15 29 15 65268 000 000 OROVE w U. tbtbS-4 00 0 128.0 y 2 1 L 0 16741 STREET Page 4 of 7 1 T s?6,a CLEVELAND b PARK 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (1997) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t=l &t2=1 &t3=... 9/6/2005 , Pinellas,. County Property Apprai41 Information: 15 29 15 65268 000 000 Page 5 of 7 141 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2000) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t=1 &t2=1 &t3=... 9/6/2005 ry 711 tp ?r? a ? ° rte rwr?1'4+- % , 2 tTl http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t=1 &t2=1 &t3=... 9/6/2005 . Pinellas County Property Apprails Information: 15 29 15 65268 000 000 r S n k' Back to Search. Page An explanation of this screen Page 7 of 7 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t=1 &t2=1 &t3=... 9/6/2005 OR6GINAL A TS' 1 1 20035 PLANni Svcs GiTYC? (:t.tf..:? f.R FLD2005-06058 1242 CLEVELAND ST Date Received: 06/30/2005 A VERY IMPORTANT PET ZONING DISTRICT: D LAND USE: CBD ATLAS PAGE: 287B PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS CLWCoverSheet 100-mS utheMyrtrtleeAvenue -9 Sea, + Cle ter, Florida 33756 Telr a: 727-562-4567 Fax: 562-4865 ! SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION I SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans i SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE .I; * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ASE #: TE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: .ORIGINAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: AVIP PET SALON MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER:727-459.4400 PROPERTY OWNER(S): (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed provide original signature(s) on page AGENT NAME: ?°" "? Cwt;, oTl FAX NUMBER: MAILING ADDRESS:200 2"o AVENUE SOUTH, # 462, ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33701 PHONE NUMBER:72'7 451) q 4 0 O FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: Q A PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 47202.A) RI TRFFT-A 3 t: ;tf. y f? r R i . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE SURVEY M _ (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 15/29115/65268/000/0030 'ARCEL SIZE: 20,889 SF 0.48 ACRES MOL (acres, square feet) ROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): EXISTING 3200 SF BUILDING TO BE CONVERTED INTO PET SALON (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) SCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):. 0 JD 9-c -M. t ?- 6- )--(70 WI i Xl c; ? ?.S ? ? C`l?•t-,?? t ? ? .} Ir ? } ?1 0?.. Altach sheets and be specific when identifying tng t e rrequest (include ttfl s"T?d ?e?ewa ftS'"€?'g. reduction in r Iced-nudibbr ofi paflftAq' §pa'des, specific use, etc. (6-0n+- u- 715 I ?!!''? 1 1 t??J } f 1 PUSS: ..,._..._._..-..._ ........ ? _;? .,, .?? - age 1 of 7 - Flexi fe Developmeno ensive I nfi I Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) 71OUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable I SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) 1:). WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) I Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1 The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. BOARDING, GROOMING DAY CARE, PET WALKING AND VETERINARIAN VISITS. SMALL OUTSIDE AGILITY EVENTS WILL TAKE PLACE AND TRANSPORTATION OF PETS AND DROP OFF WILL TAKE PLACE UNDER THE EXISTING CANOPY 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. NO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ARE ADJACENT TO THIS SITE AS THIS SITS ON A CORNER LOT. THE VACANT RESTAURANT WILL BE CONVERTED INTO A UNIQUE BUSINESS WHICH WILL ENHANCE THE ENTIRE AREA 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. THERE WILL BE NO ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE HEALTH AND/OR SAFETY ON ANY PERSONS IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA AS ALL PETS WILL BE LEASHED OF CONTAINED WITHIN A SIX(6) FOOT FENCE. SEE REQUEST FOR CODE DEVIATION SECTION 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. THE PET SALON WILL REDUCE THE TRAFFIC AS THE ITE TRIP GENERATION TABLES INDICATE A REDUCTION IN TRAFFIC FROM THE RESTAURANT. THE RETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING ARE 10 SPACES LESS THAN RESTAURANT REQUIREMENTS 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. THE PET SALON WILL PROVIDE PET CARE AND TRAINING GIVING THE COMMUNITY A HIGH QUALITY FACILITY. THIS UNIQUE SALON _ IS NOT AVAILABLE WITHIN THE CITY. THIS FACILITY WILL BE A PET SHELTER DURING STORM EVACUATION EVENTS. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. AS THE PET SERVICES WILL EITHER TAKE PLACE WITHIN THE FACILITY OF WITHIN A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH FENCE ENCLOSURE THER _ WILL BE NO ADVERSE AND/OR VISUAL EFFECT ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. THE FACILITY WILL ACCEPT PETS DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS OF 6AM TO 7PM, 7 DAYS PER WEEK. . Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: I The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. A PET SALON IS NOT A PERMITTED USE IN A RESTAURANT USE. AND THEREFORE THIS REQUEST I 017T5 Of FORMON WITH GROOMING, CARE AND RETAIL PET P ri DIIC:TrH?F' fNQ F-DIATI IS EX Lp? E ? j f I U U Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development ! gi$ipf?elaeiisijc^I n?f lI ,gp4icatignl ty of ? ORIGIN/ AND REQUEST THAT FACILITY BE ALLOWED TO CONSTRUCT A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH FENCE ALONG THE BACK OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ALONG LINCOLN AVENUE. THIS FENCE WILL ALLOW SAFETY OF THE PETS DURING OUTSIDE TRAINING. THE REQUESTED FENCE WILL PREVENT PETS FROM ENTERING THE ADJACENT ROADS AND PROPERTIES AS THE PERMITTED HEIGHT OF 42" CAN BE BREACHED Ju' 0 1 2005 V(;b PLANNING OF . f 71 1 SVCS PTY OF (.I.E.A::'i:,.t: fl Page 2 of 7-Flexible Development Comprehensive In fiI Application 2005- City of Clearwater The development of the parcel proposed f velopment as a comprehensive infill redeveloprrWroject or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) AS THE RESTAURANT SITE IS VACANT AND THE PARKING NEEDING REPAIR THE PET SALON PROJECT WILL ENHANCE THE SITE AND PROVIDE LANDSCAPING. HAVING THE SITE OPERATIONAL WILL INCREASE THE VALUE OF THIS FACILITY AS WELL AS ADJACENT PROPERTIES. EXISTING VALUE $650,000. PROPOSED APPRAISED VALUE &725,000. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. PET CARE FACILITIES ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE CITY 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. ADJACENT USES ARE COMMERCIAL AND RIGHT OF WAY. THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE NO ADVERSE EFFECT. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. A SEARCH WAS CONDUCTED FOR A SIMILAR FACILITY HOWEVER, OTHER BUILDINGS WITH THE LAND THAT IS REQUIRED FOR TRAINING WS EITHER NOT AVAILABLE OR LOCATED IN AN AREA THE WOULD NOT BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE REQUESTED USE. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. THE EXISTING FACILITY IS A VACANT RESTAURANT WITH DETERIORATING PAVING AND VERY LITTLE LANDSCAPING. THE PROPOSED FACILITY WILL ENHANCE THE PARCEL AND BRING A VISIBLE SITE INTO AN ATTRACTIVE, NECESSARY BUSINESS The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY WILL BENEFIT FROM THE DEVELOPMENT OF A THRIVING BUSINESS ON A SITE THAT IS CURRENTLY VACANT. THIS SALON WILL BE THE FIRST PET CENTER IN CLEARWATER. OTHERS EXIST IN DIFFERENT CITIES AND STATES. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ALL REQUIRED SETBACKS AND PARKING ARE MET FOR THE SITE. THE PARKING SPACES ARE BEING REDUCED FROM 24 FOR THE RESTAURANT TO 12 FOR THE SALON PER THE CITY CODE I,, F_:' 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula ?r PUAk1l1N?; o I a'1C:w Division 14 of A icle 3 jrVill"e 6216ble tc avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. THERE WILL BE NO ON-STREET PARKING'"'' Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive In fi I Application 2005- City of Cl `IRIG1NAL 10. The design of all buildings complies with thisurist District or Downtown District design guidelinesavision 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. THIS FACILITY HAS BEEN VACANT FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND THE SITE HAS BECOME SOMEWHAT UNATTRACTIVE DUE TO THE VACANCY. WHILE THE BUILDING ITSELF IS ATTRACTIVE, THE SITE REQUIRES LANDSCAPING AND RE-PAVING. THE SITE WILL BE BROUGHT INTO LANDSCAPING COMPLIANCE AND WILL BECOME A UNIQUE NEW BUSINESS IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. THE BUSINESS WILL HIRE LOCAL STUDENTS, ACCEPT VOLUNTEERS, GROOM PETS TO BE ADOPTED BY EXISTING ANIMAL ORGANIZATIONS, ORGANIZE STUDENT DAY TRIPS AND PROVIDE A SHELTER DURING EVACUATION EVENTS. I° 1 'zcz I ; _.M. CA i Y 01 - (... ..... . Page 5 of 7- Flexible Development Comprehensive In fi I Application 2005- City of Clearwater ilm? d ! 1 i:r t E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTA EQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater S Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ! At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stonmwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable I Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) n 1 SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ! TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater); ahd location, I - including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; -- -- LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; (~' I Y OF Ch.f. . -• .. . - ! PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the Parking standards (ie Reduce number of spaces)' Prior to the submittal of this application- the methodology of such study shal be aPProved by the Community Development Coordinator and sha] be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering PrinciPles The findings of the study w i I be used in determining whether or not deviations to the Parking standards are aPProved; ! GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ! PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ! COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; I SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date p Location map; - Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; 11 - Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; .- Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; - 12005 A!I required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; ? All required sight triangles; '"a,tdl?;1V Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and spe en f~`('I a•, r• ,.s4. trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; w« Location of all public and private easements; - Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi I Application 2005- City of Clearwater - w Location of existing public and private utils including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lin&anholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and ? ? ? ? L 8 Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; r Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. I REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) and color rendering if possible; I FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) Ij-5L Ur- I LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; I c i I Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ ;delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; PLO„ ? OPMENT SV 7 Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ! REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) (color rendering if possible); ! ' RIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ! COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi I Application 2005- City of Clearwater 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.-A.23) . Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ! BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ! REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) I All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. I All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ! Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ! Reduced signage proposal (8'/s X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) I Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-5624750) Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ! Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs 4AUTION ach turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. raffic Impact Study is not recuired. - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND E HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department a ( _) ti62L,45 L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and auth ze City representatives o visit and photograph the property d riled in this applicatio Sigoatd-r'? M property owner or representative - STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this A.D. 20 to me and/or by , who is personally known produced as identification. - Notary public, 11, D My commission expires: day of has `,., iii Page 8 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi I Aoolication 2"05- Citv of Clearwater ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (1 am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/Ne), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Notary Public My Commission Expires: S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc t D ;Y??;`_..?.. ?TF - .-- vv?i5 Page 9 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi I Application 2005- Citv of Clearwater 09/17/2001 14:48 7275624755 ENG PAGE 01/01 " ? C7 AL PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 100 S_ Myztle Ave., #220, 33756-5520 mater PO Box 4748, 748, Clearwater, FL 33758748 v Phone: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)562-4755 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT IN LIEU OF RETENTION NAME OF SITE::' LOCATION: PREPARED By! 92 -!IZ7,7 DATE: -09/ 14/01 OWNER'S NAM0- RAIN TZEKAS PHONE: - ADDIRESS: 1242 C =ELAND STREET CONTRACTOR /REPRESENTATIVE (if any): JAMES SHAW PHONE: (727) 82.1-6537- FX - (Z27) 821^-8563 ADDRESS: 218 for AliI MM IIUBTS? ST PRTKRSIillltG yr_ 337tH REASON FOR REQUEST: No STORMNATRR ATIFAMTtOH OR TRRATMENT PRQ IDIIZD to be completed &Z W 4 (using rational formula AQ= ACIA) A= TOTAL ARE,+ OF.SITE (Divide s .f. by 43,S60) ........................................ (ACRE) C- Cpre - Cpost (Weighted Runoff Coefficient After Aevelopment) ........ ... ..... _475 Cpre = ((.qS x existilag impervious area) + (.20 x pervious area)) / total area ?, 95 Cpost = ((.475 x existing impervious area)* + (.20 x pervious area)) /total area = *475 I= 3.6 (based on 60 min. T.O.C.) 1Q- .ALCTt# _....:.4.475)(3.b)(.0+13 ............................................ _ .017 c.fs- CITY OF CLEA RWATER VOL. REQUIRED (AQ x 3600) ......................... 61.2 c.f (Minimum SWFWMD first 1/2" or A/24) ........................................................... = 18.75 c.f. VOLUME PROVIDED ...... :............................................................................ = n 01 TOTAL VOL. TO BE COMPENSATED BY P.T.L.O. (volume required by City - vol. provided) .............................. 61-2 c.f. P.I.L.O. AREA, total volume / 3ft. (assumed pond depth) .......................... = 74 A s.f. ESTIMATED LAND VALUE (125% of tax assessed value) .......................... 7.44 per s.f. TOTAL AMOUN'T' DUE (P-11-0. area z estimated land value) ................... =$ - *use .95 for flood prone area Section 32.347 of the code of Ordinances of the City allows developers to make, payment in the form of fie-in-lieu-vf charges and wave certain construction requirements. 77te owner understands and agrees that the Payment in lieu of Retention must be made prior to the issuance of a Building Permit and the City reserves the right to use subject funds for construction of City stormwater facilities as designated by the City Manager, O"er or owner's Representative S: I worrlltemplalelpaymont in Lieu revised:16114198 •' l Date /l r^ .01 U mo, 75?- {x;.16 Lr?'I.iiJ t r=F? 0 August 11, 2005 To: The City of Clearwater Planning Development From: A Very Important Pet Center 1242 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Florida 33761 Case # FLD2005-06058 Response: Interpretation of code regarding the boarding of canines at aVIP Center. The staff and the Committee Development coordinators indicated that such boarding use could not be applied for under this type of application. I would appreciate a written response to my request for boarding dogs under the Flexible Development application. The canines will be cared for and managed at all times. Mr. Todd Pressman will be representing me. Sincerely, Jaycee Roth A Very Important Pet (7 F? ?i.1'11r1•it• qt C? ?Ci.l./r' ri.? 1 S VCS t l.t . z4 3 _ ._ _01Y OF 0 \_ J August 11, 2005 To: The City of Clearwater Planning Development ORIGINAL From: A Very Important Pet Center 1242 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Florida 33761 Case # FLD2005-06058 Response: I '- -111 e-n 91 A 1 ;? w1 Hours of operation are currently set for: A. Open for drop off at front door 6:00 A.M. B. Close the evening at 9:00 P.M. May not pick up dogs after that time. C. Dogs must in be inside building by 7:30 P.M. 2. How much area to be used business: A. 300 Sq. Ft. Retail area B. 550 Sq. Ft. Grooming Area C. 400 Sq. Ft. Baking Area D. 1000 Sq. Ft. Cageless dog area 3. How is this proposal characteristic of the adjacent properties: A. The landscaping will be in compliance and give a clean and well- maintained appearance. B. The building to the west is only the block side facing the AVIP. C. The Building to the East is across the street with street noise on both the west side and the south side. It is a motel that the center would have no impact. It would provide anyone staying at the motel a place for their dogs to stay when they are away from their room. D. The Building on the south side of the street has no affect it is across Cleveland Street. E. Area to the north is a vacant lot that is approximately 100 ft from the 6 ft fence in the back of AVIP center. This has very little impact on this area due to the distance from the commercial area of the center with a commercial vacant lot between. I feel this has less impact on the area than a restaurant that is open much later in the evenings. Noise with trash bins in the back and cars coming and going. This area is fenced and dogs will be in by 7:30. F. This center will support the needs of the community in many ways. There are over 58,000 dogs in Clearwater. Just 10 years ago there was only about 38,000 dogs in Clearwater. It is growing and people are becoming more and more attached to their canine companions. We are short on evacuation centers according to the SPCA. This will give the local 0 0 residents a security. I have been told it is not in a flood zone. Most of the boarding facilities in Clearwater are cages and lock up the dog until the owner comes back to pick them up. I am offering a much more friendly and healthy atmosphere. All dogs will get basic training and attention. This is exactly what the City of Clearwater needs for so many residents coming to the area that will be bringing even more canines. I have the talent and the passion to work with these dogs. My goal is to have an establishment that the city of Clearwater can count on. In cases of emergencies AVID will pick up the dog and take it to the center so it is not unatt G. nded or left alone in times of desperation. With the 6' fencesurrounding the outside area should create low impact on the area and enhance it's charm. The majority of the customers will be picking up or dropping off which again is much lower impact than a restaurant. I want to work with the City of Clearwater in every way to bring good things to the area and make us all proud. 4. This business will not hinder businesses in the area. It will be a training facility for residents and their dogs. It will be educational center that will bring more balanced family pets. I will have employment opportunities for the area. The distance of the homes with another commercial property between would not create any impact on any homes in the area. It is mostly a commercial area. 5. The estimate to develop this building and lot is about $30,000, not including the interior. 6. Guideline checklist. ORIGINAL !7 1 f P131 1 i "4t.;3 1? PLANNING CAF r ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PR ' IOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) -ry ?? C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ?1 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFI page 6) PLANPa,'v? (7 _? i ;( ; D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) I Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: i The proposed development of the land will be in harmnnv with the sra1P hi ilk rnvarnna rlPncifii -nri rf.a?? tee. s -Ai-..e..a .. . .a: :. is located. BOARDING, GROOMING DAY CARE, PET WALKING AND VETERINARIAN VISITS. SMALL OUTSIDE AGILITY EVENTS WILL TAKE PLACE AND TRANSPORTATION OF PETS AND DROP OFF WILL TAKE PLACE UNDER THE EXISTING CANOPY 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. NO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ARE ADJACENT TO THIS SITE AS THIS SITS ON A CORNER LOT. THE VACANT RESTAURANT WILL BE CONVERTED INTO A UNIQUE BUSINESS WHICH WILL ENHANCE THE ENTIRE AREA 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. THERE WILL BE NO ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE HEALTH AND/OR SAFETY ON ANY PERSONS IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA AS ALL PETS WILL BE LEASHED OF CONTAINED WITHIN A SIX(6) FOOT FENCE. SEE REQUEST FOR CODE DEVIATION SECTION 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. THE PET SALON WILL REDUCE THE TRAFFIC AS THE ITE TRIP GENERATION TABLES INDICATE A REDUCTION IN TRAFFIC FROM TH _ RESTAURANT. THE RETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING ARE 10 SPACES LESS THAN RESTAURANT REQUIREMENTS 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. THE PET SALON WILL PROVIDE PET CARE AND TRAINING GIVING THE COMMUNITY A HIGH QUALITY FACILITY. THIS UNIQUE SALON _ IS NOT AVAILABLE WITHIN THE CITY. THIS FACILITY WILL BE A PET SHELTER DURING STORM EVACUATION EVENTS. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. A.S THE PET SERVICES WILL EITHER TAKE PLACE WITHIN THE FACILITY OF WITHIN A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH FENCE ENCLOSURE THERE _ WILL BE NO ADVERSE AND/OR VISUAL EFFECT ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. THE FACILITY WILL ACCEPT PETS DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS OF 6AM TO 7PM, 7 DAYS PER WEEK. ! Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1 The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. A PET SALON IS NOT A PERMITTED USE IN A RESTAURANT USE AND THEREFORE THIS REQUEST I A SALON WITH GROOMING, CARE AND RETAIL PET PRODUCTS. THE FENCE DEVIATION IS EX L(?I E EE Lg I_ t % FORM U s Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi I Application 2015- City of .11'iV f13•" rl c:tsa?raarcn ? ORIGINAL ORIGINAL REQUEST THAT FACILITY BE ALLOWED TO CONSTRUCT A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH FENCE ALONG THE BACK OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ALONG LINCOLN AVENUE. THIS FENCE WILL ALLOW SAFETY OF THE PETS DURING OUTSIDE TRAINING. THE REQUESTED FENCE WILL PREVENT PETS FROM ENTERING THE ADJACENT ROADS AND PROPERTIES AS THE PERMITTED HEIGHT OF 42" CAN BE BREACHED tea Y , F ri ,1 .a? ow Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive In fi I Application 2005- City of Clearwater 'MUNAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed Development as a comprehensive infll redevelopr project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) AS THE RESTAURANT SITE IS VACANT AND THE PARKING NEEDING REPAIR THE PET SALON PROJECT WILL ENHANCE THE SITE AND PROVIDE LANDSCAPING. HAVING THE SITE OPERATIONAL WILL INCREASE THE VALUE OF THIS FACILITY AS WELL AS ADJACENT PROPERTIES. EXISTING VALUE $650,000. PROPOSED APPRAISED VALUE &725,000. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. PET CARE FACILITIES ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE CITY 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. ADJACENT USES ARE COMMERCIAL AND RIGHT OF WAY. THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE NO ADVERSE EFFECT. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. A SEARCH WAS CONDUCTED FOR A SIMILAR FACILITY HOWEVER, OTHER BUILDINGS WITH THE LAND THAT IS REQUIRED FOR TRAINING WS EITHER NOT AVAILABLE OR LOCATED IN AN AREA THE WOULD NOT BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE REQUESTED USE. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. THE EXISTING FACILITY IS A VACANT RESTAURANT WITH DETERIORATING PAVING AND VERY LITTLE LANDSCAPING. THE PROPOSED FACILITY WILL ENHANCE THE PARCEL AND BRING A VISIBLE SITE INTO AN ATTRACTIVE, NECESSARY BUSINESS 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY WILL BENEFIT FROM THE DEVELOPMENT OF A THRIVING BUSINESS ON A SITE THAT IS CURRENTLY VACANT. THIS SALON WILL BE THE FIRST PET CENTER IN CLEARWATER. OTHERS EXIST IN DIFFERENT CITIES AND STATES. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ALL REQUIRED SETBACKS AND PARKING ARE MET FOR THE SITE. THE PARKING SPACES ARE BEING REDUCED FROM-24, FOR THE RESTAURANT TO 12 FOR THE SALON PER THE CITY CODE E3 T.? ?.J t t LYV? (? I ? PLAN?tines pt 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula: in Divisi660kof Article 3 will be avalable to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. THERE WILL BE NO ON-STREErt PARRING Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n f i I Application 2005- City of 9RIGINAL 10. The design of all buildings complies with the*rist District or Downtown District design guidelinestivision 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. THIS FACILITY HAS BEEN VACANT FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND THE SITE HAS BECOME SOMEWHAT UNATTRACTIVE DUE TO THE VACANCY. WHILE THE BUILDING ITSELF IS ATTRACTIVE, THE SITE REQUIRES LANDSCAPING AND RE-PAVING. THE SITE WILL BE BROUGHT INTO LANDSCAPING COMPLIANCE AND WILL BECOME A UNIQUE NEW BUSINESS IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. THE BUSINESS WILL HIRE LOCAL STUDENTS, ACCEPT VOLUNTEERS, GROOM PETS TO BE ADOPTED BY EXISTING ANIMAL ORGANIZATIONS, ORGANIZE STUDENT DAY TRIPS AND PROVIDE A SHELTER DURING EVACUATION EVENTS. P ,.: , i (.. .. l? ? 1 It Lr- IJ Y _ U 0 1 1M5 11 r, .WvUts Page 5 of 7- Flexible Development Comprehensive In fi I Application 2005- City of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITT EQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Manual and 4-202.A.21) 4 Drainage Design Criteria A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a Stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the. narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ! COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMDyPERM T?s. U6iMl (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable + L? U 1U? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): I ,a, ? Stormwater plan as noted above is included ' 7 I Lwvv Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and.finished floor= elevations shall bei, .C` provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 5624750. ., F SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) 1 SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ! TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ! PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the Parking standards (ie Reduce number of spaces) Prior to the submittal of this aPPlication• the methodology of such study shal be aPProved by the Community Development Coordinator and shat be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering Principles The findings of the study w i I. be used in determining whether or not deviations to the Parking standards are a"Proved; ! GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ! PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ! COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; 1 SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): All dimensions; - North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date p - Location map; - Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; - Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; Ali existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and spec trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; :. .L (J -Won JLY C., /. . V t;b Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi I Application 2005- City of Clearwater y , Location of existing public and private ut*, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer li&anholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); _ Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ORIGINAL 1 SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: r_ Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ! REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; I FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arbodst", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: ,1,2 All existing and proposed structures; • •` L_J _ Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; -?--~? R --~T J VGcA Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ?'(??ll ?"'?"? OF ?' might visibility triangles; - Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; - Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; - Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ! REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %z X 11) (color rendering if possible); ! IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ! COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. O' j Mrll s =s?+ t; x Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive 1 n fi 1 Application 2005- City of Clearwater BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-2022 A.23) _ 9 r Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ! BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ! REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/s X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) I All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ! All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) I Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ?-l ! Reduced signage proposal (8 %X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) I Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ! Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs 40AUTION ach turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. raffic Impact Study is not required. - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND E HAS S BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and auth ze City representatives o visit and photograph the property d ribed in this applicatio Sicxa ? S 'property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this A.D. 20 to me and/or by , who is personally known produced as identification. Notary public, 11, D My commission expires: day of has :Oii Page 8 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive In fi I Anolication 2005- Citv of Clearwater ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) `=--- -- 'Fri iy i arm a ,.?T? ?; l 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. 1<7 COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner/ L, Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this personally appeared Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Commission. Expires: day of who having been first duly swom Notary Public My S:IPlanning DepartmenMpplication Formsldevelopment reviewlflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc D Page 9 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive I n fi I Application 2005- Citv of Clearwater 09/17/2001 14:48 7275624755 ENG PAGE OR?IGINAL 0 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION Arwater 100 S.Myrtle Ave., #220, 33756-5520 4PO Box 4748, Clearwater, FL. 337584748 v Phone: (727)5624750, Fax: (727)5624755 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT IN LIEU OF RETENTION NAME OF SITE::' LOCATION: PREPARED BX: DATE: OWNER'S NAMI?a: RAIX TZEKAS PHONE: - ADDRESS: 1242 C1F.E'G'EL 01/01 ' i CONTRACTOR /REPRESENTATIVE (if any): JAMES SH&W ` PHONE: (727) 8Z 1-•8537 Fit: (727) 82I^-8_ 5.63 ADDRESS: 718 tar iAVIiXM XM331- ST FRT'RR$BMW, Fr 3-117A1 REASON FOR REQUEST, NO gToRmATER ATTRNt=TON OR TRRAT7'S1tNT PRO11D D nT to be comateted by P, fi.4 (hying ra/tonal formula dQ= ACIA) A= TOTAL ARE4 OF.SITE (Divide s .f by 43,560) ........................................ .01 (ACRE) C- Cpre - Cpost (Weighted Runoff Coefficient After Development) ................ -_475 Cpre = ((.45 x existing impervious area 1+ (.20 x pervious area)) /total area '-95 Cpost = ((.475 x existing impervious area)* + (.20 x pervious area)) /total area = •475 I^ 3.6 (based on 60 min. T.U.C.) JQ- AC>(A ;.?.475)(3.b)(.Oi} _ .0I7 c.f s. CITY OF CLEA9WATER VOL. REQUIRED (AQ x 3600) ........................ - 61.2 c.f (Minimum SWFWMD first 1/2" or A/24) ........................................................... = 18.75 C.f. VOLUME PROVIDED ................. = n 01 TOTAL VOL. TO BE COMPENSATED BY P.I.L.O. (volume required by City- vol. provided) ............................................. = h l . 2 c.f. P.I.L.O. AREA total volume / 3ft. (assumed pond depth) .......................... = 20 A s.f. ]ESTIMATED LAND VALUE (125% of tax assessed value) .......................... = $ 7.44 per s.f. TOTAL AMOUNT DUE (P.I.L.O. area s estimated land value) .................... _ $ 151-84 'use .95 for flood Prone area Section 32.347 of the code of Ordinances of the City allows developers to make, payment in the form offEe-in-lieu-vf charges and wave certain construction rerluirements. The owner understands and agrees that the Payment in,feu of Retention must be made prior to the issuance of a Building Permit and the City reserves the right to use subject funds for construction of City stormwater facilities as designated by the City Manager. Owner or Owner's Representative S: 1 ftrdllemplateWdYmimt in Liek of Retention.doc revised:10114198 Date f i n? _. .. _,.? .._ !J- L l 1? • August 11, 2005 To: The City, of Clearwater Planning Development From: A Very Important Pet Center 1242 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Florida 33761 Case # FLD2005-06058 0 Response: Interpretation of code regarding the boarding of canines at aVIP Center. The staff and the Committee Development coordinators indicated that such boarding use could not be applied for under this type of application. I would appreciate a written response to my request for boarding dogs under the Flexible Development application. The canines will be cared for and managed at all times. Mr. Todd Pressman will be representing me. Sincerely, Jaycee Roth A Very Important Pet PLY", I ._ ` _ _ s August 11, 2005 To: The City of Clearwater Planning Development From: A Very Important Pet Center 1242 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Florida 33761 Case # FLD2005-06058 Response: • 1. Hours'of operation are currently set for: A. Open for drop off at front door 6:00 A.M. B. Close the evening at 9:00 P.M. May not pick up dogs after that time. C. Dogs must in be inside building by 7:30. P.M. F?i ? a?J n Er, 2. How much area to be used business: A. 300 Sq. Ft. Retail area "j B. 550 Sq. Ft. Grooming Area V C. 400 Sq. Ft. Baking Area Pull< D. 1000 Sq. Ft. Cageless dog area 3. How is this proposal characteristic of the adjacent properties: A. The landscaping will be in compliance and give a clean and well- maintained appearance. B. The building to the west is only the block side facing the AVID. C. The Building to the East is across the street with street noise on both the west side and the south side. It is a motel that the center would have no impact. It would provide anyone staying at the motel a place for their dogs to stay when they are away from their room. D. The Building on the south side of the street has no affect it is across Cleveland Street. E. Area to the north is a vacant lot that is approximately 100 ft from the 6 ft fence in the back of AVID center. This has very little impact on this area due to the distance from the commercial area of the center with a commercial vacant lot between. I feel this has less impact on the area than a restaurant that is open much later in the evenings. Noise with trash bins in the back and cars coming and going. This area is fenced and dogs will be in by 7:30. F. This center will support the needs of the community in many ways. There are over 58,000 dogs in Clearwater. Just 10 years ago there was only about 38,000 dogs in Clearwater. It is growing and people are becoming more and more attached to their canine companions. We are short on evacuation centers according to the SPCA. This will give the local A • residents a security. I have been told it is not in a flood zone. Most of the boarding facilities in Clearwater are cages and lock up the dog until the owner comes back to pick them up. I am offering a much more friendly and healthy atmosphere. All dogs will get basic training and attention. This is exactly what the City of Clearwater needs for so many residents coming to the area that will be bringing even more canines. I have the talent and the passion to work with these dogs. My goal is to have an establishment that the city of Clearwater can count on. In cases of emergencies AVID will pick up the dog and take it to the center so it is not unatt G. nded or left alone in times of desperation. With the 6' fencesurrounding the outside area should create low impact on the area and enhance it's charm. The majority of the customers will be picking up or dropping off which again is much lower impact than a restaurant. I want to work with the City of Clearwater in every way to bring good things to the area and make us all proud. 4. This business will not hinder businesses in the area. It will be a training facility for residents and their dogs. It will be educational center that will bring more balanced family pets. I will have employment opportunities for the area. The distance of the homes with another commercial property between would not create any impact on any homes in the area. It is mostly a commercial area. 5. The estimate to develop this building and lot is about $30,000, not including the interior. 6. Guideline checklist. ?. Fq,? -QLLARkV"i,.La It'. l .I <M q mr Ler a• -emu ,E.• h4, ?y _ o 77 1 V A, NMCOw'M Mr MAW' CCNSmCI 5' CONCRETE =EW a,ey o.. Mr? OLANDCPE PLAN BcnIS: ? 4RWATER CAFE RESTAURANT 1242 CFEVELAND ST. 1R4IATER. PINEILAS COUNTY,. FLORIDA REVISIONS SHAY k ASSOCIATES ENClN56RINC DSSlON & NSULTdNfB Msm FOR wn$"WcBON ow- 218 IST.T4ENIlE NORM ST. N NN . i8?88flORIDd 33701 M Ary. MSC. .Ana Goho6 dB o AEY. BY Rar. AQ sw. 11•1 pey. eon: wwil. ww a q lj?, CD ?'v t ',:Jo 0 LJ 9 .v.. u vu .• vwvarvwvr w I . v vw -~ .L ? .., -It+- „ U V 'V/"--- L-- -"'-C'-------- - -11 --- ORIGINgL t?1+3 1 1 LL...3 ; , PLANN { v 4 ,• o?Ricir:gc as-O j P Rear Elevation SECTION 15, TOWN SHIP29SOUTH, RANGEISEAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 5 T ? A Z?9 F' 3 n" 0 PCN. A"Y 4- RNlF(IOTI 0..4. P{O1lNT'3 w>Drv?a¢x u>e TN[ S: e. h I LEnAI uE9.ti11Vttp.: coF4NR OFlCf I1, v ' ALL N LO1 Y ANU 111E ! St 61 NIF SWlll 11 PEFI DF LO1 E wD°mY DF E1WRL > q.J p t2 0 O . . -1 OF .11. A prW IYI61C1 OF LO13 E0, 1I Ab 11, R. x. , . . , n0 LA 01 I-AWY-3.11D I31UN, AC CHID 10 n1E - pl DLAF 1NE11[CF AS IIf 7FCEU 111 PLA1 DDOF .. PADS 110 DF T.E 1.11 Ilf.<p116 lY 5 PI11FSlA9 CDAItY, PLUM UA. 0 A ' u •a SUlvlrpl 9 1WIF3: m° I. U1A1111N0 YIE ASWNLU AIIU II0IA'Ik0 10 FIIF, IXNIfIM1IF.I IIIN11- P1n(d6'S Cf•MAY LENS OF (. WILAIW 31REEt, ALnD OEINO 1116 ;NWII4OLY F1R (3/>7 J 41 RT4 eA- (Bi NT) Z 1 , L h O . ASOUIEU MAALIM belNO3 So-OD-W- E, 589° 58,19„E 0'(P) 209 F/C p.,a NOIL'YN 15,(f) 83aT 209 ,t 6 Z W !. 11113 6DUEY WES IA11 IIE, f." W UEIUIxINE ..03t. '. i . F . o c I. NU UAFN MUIIIO[A51OWTIW LaATED UNLESS O01EW 6 NonD. 500°28'05°E vF w a W Nn. IN FLLI AUU 1k1 xIF.O[U. °• OENFN91pn ?' 6a F)5 NB9'$$'33E 4013 (F) ' SO- 11 FT LCT L /? {5P4AtT ? WP / s ? 4CteR Q t- - 11 .11116 SUNFY ft-41111 11 16 SWxN AS EALA141 CA le S 9pIEWlE 0 - SEUx it U( ftlLt.ti k WMI{tNENI 1.1411141 CA D ( < 40.0 (P) V 5? 0 ? 5AO15 ItItTTEN IRY OLO REPVOLIC NATIONAL TIME IIISUPJJICE JAN-Y 10 WxaA.p -ECTIYF VAIE 1005 W EA-F NIJ S R lP/3) GWa a ° r' bAKlSS Et° 5-ue ' V 1' m . , . . . : 4ITW Ix WD 11r 1E CpD111NEN1. LvESST 4D AT E/F j D &mgeES 0 W Q D, IIA Cpl. 1. 1.1. P. XAP GD It T1 - IN L -11 11500E 0015 D DIE EVOJECI PRPERTY APVEARS IL LIE IN OF LCT 6 S xOrS •E . V O x I ' No ! paMOrJN tVO OF 11t 1 MpVjrY OP THL3 W11VEY WCJ6 DAI , ALWU IWF 1, NEP 11EYIEEpr ..E: AVW91 Itl, IY31. DAIk a 'RR SE Q T i. t.n.x. tADEA: AVWSf I0, 1095. b RP N. aN o a R. =D! b '8 wl,l Z Q. Ypl'9 CND IPIGIE; RR ONE STORY' N J 3 n IFNn1r :, x11 r, nI.1 r 1R DlnY11 x33 nAtN Cw-•qN m' 1 0 n m?;u¢I ulw<AIO ?n1A, eA1c Aav+e an9nrO :urver .rm otW Wn. FAASONRY ?.,. UIQ" +'na1 Au[ hroull uW IWPlu w n! O[.Sr .., .,Aaa 1N1 . 1131 99 PT n ,,: nlllvr u.O 11,A1 Il Nlll n•.: IN vlx;nSUCNV11rl E.Lr1 a3 uurt Lpr < LL zIC va.r,. I xmllnn anon 1n u1r, OWS[Y, NFn:. „ ,?. I' y J.v 'pYN:GL.„N1mn3s' A, 34, ? o-M 00 a Y44LT o ONE 5TOE Y- a'" N I Fa6U! I un r, C. A. E F SON 3NC CF 11fIG1 G AUtlgnll I A.UOY Y YMASON RY RR Puxr[R 0 41NY6Y M11 YALIU W1653 EMDCSSEU NIr11 SIUItNO SNrvE1N1'B SG1. 41 3 •:J L.F. 3 E m A9w{ T ,Ax [R M L-TJ ') n 0) RN R 40! to I k w N LOT 3 B 'j O S ,SP4FLT z RN _ _S o > Z a c R FLTrt. Q ttTq. / c' CIA. X31 Le r D • T d aee _coxL. srGlrYl m S 90°00'00" E r 169;Q0 (F7 us 'P^L..... v. 169.0 (P 1 Lac ri?i, a n: y y u `.Q P ? 4m L6 ?eRO /?,asn.?R [.:.rn,.?1fY ?nNr <i 6c°.,.ef ?-'-'_ ?AeA,.Aew i l,•ew.w fns ?n.,..r.•.F Aaa°r i D.. o<o ,L?a,a<ve. N s J rrr ?w.r-t:° ? ...cw? n 43D >., o,: of ?3° a aRa??w 0°NQO°E 2A1 3.07('5 2-03 0. Arro.mA ,AP , r Ire-,ro mm nADlp AtrP : e,°Ni? nnwrA rro'a: iapmm rv?°nolirctnoLNVn10cn nr• I,I ,n a ro> , A t Fie' °?`i?p"tt 1`in :c"?e"v10',.nc ere • AMr„IOFr. Nm 3Un4m rJl : vrmgr m? u m AI elP PS Lr . u3L rm a 1p vem °III clt: rimgry gAgwtl,ol[1N[ Mayllrn . rtP FL l tt rotin er tA,cnn a' Fnll1 Nt, RR • R'AILRe{C T154 wR F•L{4TEq vLrR • P T¢R N SIRC+ SST ROAI qOD Q C{P LB tl lEBO n( C. 2. Pelermal 9vo. PROIPStIONAL IAA' LIIALEN61O. PLARIOND ! Wx3- fEnA1Cp 143 OWN GY BVUk CLWWAIEA, Ra1N -/?_? 1 MH4E NptltdWENIbPLE9f smu SGU APFa02O ' 2pe6e '"SLYD /"F1A? t- AAJ U u Y l ' R I Full ?i ( 9M i??? r E y , s. i? ; ggp ?..p a , .Z J !?fii I O v / 1 r 0 `.i •? 17ti' L y S•rrH????? '., f-1G+do'.,?'-09M?1vi'Ati f"'7 a : ?5 .w?4 F'p+r+ r r 7 77 r. •k tt I,X'?n.+p ,ikr4q 2 s?v, a ? 4 r { ? ? - 2 ? ? I l r t:•: ?: a^,?,ir ? ter. `p ,?( r ' t ? rte ......... ........,.«« ,.-.w,._..i'.,.. A-&A-- .Aah+'-. ,. ..`Y1",?:1.r..-.?r--r.r;s,.:.....?... .+..?...,..t,...• 4 C ' ?, ter -ZI ; „, • t 1 y? ? 1 11 ? 0 G-) 1 1 54 77- 6 ?7. z IF -11 i- F7 c CFO V ?I V V I r 0 i _ N RIGINAL • z j ..ff i Y,,??IqI{,•? t.?9 A7 ? I II, 1, la,,pp ll, I?t r? irfr r PLANIIN ";XH .ai ORIGINAL ORIGINAL A Dog Behavi*or Seminar qT Id ol"m ?ed?r k IJ At's 1 11 2zz With Dog y Behavior Expert Cesar Millan rr # 1 l O em O&0 8 13 A O e R ?iP?TE s%4 lbyf% ssIwe (qm.% d%Ntma _. iooRrCwi b e0wner q etr iLdr'1 AGO SQ *lW 1 Dk '? 1 P&I0 4% i CESAR MILLAN'S NEW DVD "PEOPLE TRAINING FOR DOGS" In his first home video, the star of TV's hit series "The Dog Whisperer with Cesar Milian" demonstrates his unique way of handling common dog problems. FEATURES AND HIGHLIGHTS OF CESAR MMLAN'S FIRST DVD! • Understanding dog psychology • Secrets of pack behavior • How dogs become "unbalanced" • The root of common dog issues including aggression, fears and phobias • The language of "energy" • The importance of calm, assertive leadership • Beginning steps to master the walk • The Red zone - dangerous aggression • The basics of exercise, discipline and affection • Feeding time with the pack leader • Cesar's own story • Exclusive footage of Cesar and his pack! ORIGINAL 0 ?c2 F PLMI This DVD is a must-have for anyone who loves dogs and wants to learn how Cesar's methods have been so successful at rehabilitating even seemingly impossible-to-correct dog behaviors. Cesar's DVD "PEOPLE TRAINING FOR DOGS" IS NOW available at our website at: www.cesannillaninc.com 4 YES! Please notify me for future DVD's, and other products from Cesar Millan. ADDRESS: PHONE: E-MAIL: Dog Psychology Center of Los Angeles 919 East 61' Street Los Angeles, CA 90001 (323) 235-3431 www.dognsvchologyicenter.com MPH Entertainment 1033 N. Hollywood Way, Suite F Burbank, CA 91506 (818) 441-5040 www.mvhent.com G wwx.x ,.w a x p1 n sa'? - _ 1 - `le N ? 7 w xn vom - 1 ,... V 10. 6 „e --?- -.wp a 1 P w F? 8 1 ? pp ( ?.. J l f e? W 40' LOT 4 I? .? air- ,px?? J? !a ? p? Qho l o s A 5 - R ? h '? IWI.PJ iF , 'T(t(? KP_ ? •?, r 1 1 QQ ???? cc \ ????IS'NI1J(SC?V ?(Q4'Nv (-(:tJI..L. ;77 ?L?teLOS i3'c??k tare c_C _To ?1•' = 13 ItI L-0L n1 0 a } 7 ? L . 1 ?YA55 .. . ? 3 77 q' )4 ? ? ? PLANT MATERIAL LIST ?? ? wM c rc wiroa wPn emaxw xMe A T _tthv _____. ___ _ w .ww rcnuuoxvrr. xroana xwux M ?. Nso W'W'W _ - If9.A' HM xn9p,14Yl0x ? ' ? ? xM.xxpPq pauox ' wipwo roe,.-awxe CDNSI0.UM 5 CdMRCRC SgEWAtlt ro? oiuxxp v 1 pY0. a 4+um 'O xw - A? A- AR- - T. CI - ?iH CIPP G> rtYG .W. CANDfC-G um OTHER S7RUCTLRES TO RE M-T-ED o 36• MAY. HE-T aM - . PLANT LEGEND wlwx -T lw«+EUS. ? -Pie x.u LANDSCAPE PLAN xAEe5 CL EVEL AND STREET (S R 6.0 _ a a N?x?aps n?wi,irvWUxT ?ARGWIIdW wlP0.1 aWM OWNER/DEVELOPER ! SITE PLAN DATE SHEET REVISIONS SHAD & ASSOCIATES SNOINSERIND DESIGN & NSULTdNTS issuD FOR CON41RUCIION ©a,w..w x. ,w-. RAIM TZEKAS & XNEZISE TZEKAS CLEARWATER CAFE RESTAURANT 9/19/01 LS 1 218 n A4 E HoRR n wc io noi 1242 CLEVELAND ST. 1242 CLEVELAND ST. W - . ? ? CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CLEAR ATER, PINELLAS COUNTY,. FLORIDA . PEV/ DALE REV. D[DD. AEY. BY Gram: RII Sodx: 1"•IC Delw ""' T F ' Aj^lr 7l ( IF °11 ? ~ ? ?I ?QT1 I1 { E O Z I Q I ? n` ? ZEN Plant Material List Common Name(s) Botanical Name Specifications Hibiscus Hibiscus Rosa-sinensis 3 Gallon Daisy r i Coreopsis V!r icillata 1 Gallon Snake Plant, Mother-in-Law's Tongue 12 Sansevieria Trifasciata Prain 1- 3 Gallon Queen Palm, Cocos plumosa Syagrus romanzoffiana 10' Clear Trunk Big Blue, Super Green 330 Liriope 1 Gallon E Leadwort, Plumbago, Skytlower Plumbago Auriclata 3 Gllon Boxwood 1113uxus Microphylla 3 Gallon 10' Overall height - 2.5" caliper. Florida Grade 1 s L Ali Areas Around Plants to be mulched wit h Cedar Mulch FCM,4"x 4" N• E. CORNEK LOT 1 Su6CJ?VIStON Also d I LEGAL DESCR mmozz -n4E S.E- CORNEFZ OF LOT 24, v THE SOUTH I PRO?'ERT1? 0? 0 FEET OF LOT A. J. MOOR EIP.Li.12, PADGETTIS•S PG. 24. AS RECORDED N NELLAS CO to z X C?Ar?.? OAKS w rs A NIA G, uAS . l1 I oS J , All AREAS BETWEEN STREET PAVEMENT AND SURVEYOR' S O'co PARKING LOT TO BE TURFED OR RECEIVE ti 1.. f3LARPIG2 Q. W 61 d _eiu tit ,??, r? s I:e 1„;,Ja?rfy s ? ,r a,,> o o..(' , 1,I rnor to 4?nctac:_ OTHER LANDSCAPING TREATMENT, 0008 OF-WAY L 1 F1 RC5/8") 4 `- f3OUNDnR't ?'28e5ef'ftGll??e, are r9• "/C 0.4 (BENT) x r ASSUMED NOr7t1 F/C O. !o' -TlA I. 1111S sut- f. b' EAST F-S5 F-1 . 4 0• W E 0 h / T Z?J9.15'CF?n N(„LD S 89° 58'19C P) 4:1.. CLF 3. WO UNUEf ZO9•?J L 4, 01L. F-777- ?p GAS d {n W 5. THIS SUf -------------- Soo ?-605"F_ s/P LANDSCAPE PI AN - At4 ETEF; P, ? f, -- SCHEUUL{ lo.G5,(F) ? ' APPROVED AS NOTED - Q 1L 4 54035 Wi N J3 ° 59 33 E 40.13 (F s, . - d cofarAwr 11.0' CPS'46.6_'(P - i 31.0' No gcCE$5 V SHOWN I{ S!RC . S,RCCS/8,.) Date- -I ?1?.,Z?0 - -- n SEE ?8 p) ?rj 6. HAVING 1250y& C5?8) E/P BY t !Y D SuRvEl6R'S O Q D FLOOD Z? `NEST 40 s -,a ?y N No'r - -' 2 U0 7 •T r F . T . R . M O 1J [E OF 1.07 4 1,0 t. Q, M T [E ?J 26.1' z SURVLYOR'S {EMOvE. A 24, ? ' 6) ,12005 ? - IMSTAW.- scot OCT N AU.. scot 0 I ONE STORE RE;?t?o,;snJL T ERVICES DEPT 26 a ' U ARL pEUl;l ? a w\SUNRY t o OLD COR• M(3A60 S o y :z_ F O.g' CLEAR O y l'9 } ? J??' ! :,; LL a Fe WHITE Alt, { _ ! ALL LANDSCAPING TO BE PROTECTED FROM WNITP, PVC, VEHICULAR OR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC BY A N iN!,uP f., ?N I \ ?\\\?: FRL-ULI - - ---------- SIX INCH HIGH CURBING OR WHEEL STOPS, Q , C. A. ONE S-'0R`(-Z 3 9 , ID II . SURVEY NO' 41.2' ?, :W- 12:5 6 Uri) 1'?pvnVyrlA '?Olc? '`. , 1? pLAN ??: ' , `, -?.,?``.'?'`• ?1` \ \? ?,4 :A W COVERED O EHTRAHCE ANY.CHANGES IN SPECIES, SPECIF!CATINS?,?? ; OR f- IJJ DESIGN WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE P! "!I ' cMv ?P 2'ft LOT 3 ° ?w'" `? a glm n y LI ?' DIRECTOR RENDERS PLAN', N d. o ,ra a 7 \ ?-A NfJS CAr' f t>7?? Z. LOT 7 FN 0. X•cuT Z lu. T Z. F 8u4. t3ROKEN f3LUG. COR..... . • ur? • .; ,, ? `____ ,'" `. NAt t qo ?? O. Cs' CLEARy e.Z II ?r 1E 4^4,P.? 1 VJ.? 1 C C' ref e. `590°0000" E 203.07 (F>> coNC• s/w cj 0?; 6g. (. E/p ; : ?.? 203.0' (P) 1,( o C'. SAM 357- E/P 1 Wray S; fZu,3S S :`coNc ,.? STORM ?rt,??6?R,ur??? c.f3. z?un ?rle.?ir. VA. A, CONIC. °;jta .. ' ?? . i- •hti aF: ?I .i11i?U ? 'E• ,? ;? '?? ... ' ''i , ?? ? ? s . ..d Iii 1 Y..y ~ + •. .. ? b ?`? ` ?? I • ORIGINAL JUL 12 2005 F? -.//......_ A __1 _---- /n_ A0 /" -A 9 _._11•.__. - ['.• mn Mn - -- ro.?ro?•.?irf?„ -- -1..I 0 ORGOL ?I Q f r- 35 • I Left Elevation i i s?_7terne¢ r? ? .. Right Elevation v ? I' ? ? d C 01 1." ol al? { ??+ eery \ ? p?i ?. \1 ? ¢4L \F. ??1?? ?~t S ? ?k ? ? S ??? ?u5 )' J?. ? ???? d A . i>.c Ali ???ll?iYCiu8Y??a?'¢?t7??n"???'truY"rlN, . SECTION 15, TOWN5141P Z9 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST P1PIELLAS COUNT`(', F-LOR'1DA 0TH/ W F T N Q . 0 IS F r j Q-C a Q FrR C3/e") r/c a¢ ?o ?TY 589° S8'19"E 209.0'(P) 500°2805' E c/r 0.66"(F) N89°59'3VE 40.13 ( I rr L SOVTN T L - I .. 4O.O'( P) , S,RC a , C(S/O`1 rJesT .a F= a OF 4 ?J O P R . O RR COR - e S T 59 FT os «enR 1i O L T 4 8 - FvT ONE 51ORY R- MASONRY R ?IZ?6 3 R P In ASPwq LT I N Nao 4a? 8 i coR-L.or r G of R w coR w ev @ B Z RR R H R . . , ` P$ ) o nLEER - PIrR 40. J . Q F•LTq. _ 5 I -__ 590°OO O - i 2O3 O`E tout. a S90'00' .o (P) 0' (P) 203 ? ?o+s' 1 /s Ur Fc ueR Lo 4. P?ObeTT'4r Su eOrV lSroV KSO ? a <oRr,eg oa :4 o , R . F•.O, rE, p ?i c¢J.Lwao r+ 0 ? .m ?a 2 2 F, NagTH 2O9.15CF) ? .2e o a w ? vn ? ? gaewgLr ? 'ACTaR W u•ol ? \ 11 3 te Q ? 3,0 a„ wficu5s -ccF- v J0 r ?I 0 s?R•'el'aR'S ?' o a L ° W Q 0 N .7 Q u e 40 `4R6?SE V Q ? s a o z < I ONE STORY N J i -j U lan IN MASONRY ,_"..,.? LL ? z . IC It J v I -_?n.. . l 4SPwgLT ? I v RAnrvrcR O I a V N - ° LOT 3 III S W gsnvgLT 0 _S O ' j `rco Ao:YS / ?a N asas z Y a I 169.0 LP). " .. , i' E P 169:Q0 TO Q n . w Q? . I OS ? ? ? / P L O4+ i'eR -- UE F.'RI?T10R: lrlF SOUTII 11 PEEL OF L lOl ] u irlNAi. uFLUr ., OF n UoU u L , P OH[ ?MUEUUli11 PLn1 RUO%L9, fAG[UIOOiOP I THE UHLIC N,:CUtUE U! t;UELLnS UuUUtT, UHV w. EVlrvkltvl'S VUI EU: - OF-HAT UJ INkk AULUrII•E,.erIU ".-1l I If llln 1 UllUlily OF 9,HEE I.S. OEENII 4FL1Nk SUOJFVr ? Ut TN 19 :,'UNVE', Nin l.r A IlI iDEAR ItlG DFIUG a 94'OV'10U'CE 1T i -01 GRWwL CON'+IDUGt1UNTL0UTEULUVLCEb OV1ERNaE LUILU. INENYUUYb Er I'" ARF 0 I'lUl nH4 UU:W L ?AIIPJ 4U.RCUN. T REFLECTS nLL Enb1NEN15 F-- nE E%L,rY-(VNO Ir. 0G1EUUlkvO- EELS IVx 11 VP Gda111 NFN, tNNi EH LA 4AOla •nll rEN OT OLO HEVUOL ICI ?Af iUNA[ TITLE IubURANCE cONPnNV. EFPF i IVE Oni E: Wr1i 10, UJU1. NO F.ASF.NErr I:: $IITt(I Ix SAID TITLE Cgwli_NCni. VuNNUr l& CIMEVL.EU F.l R. Nn ll it - YnN tlu.ruen 4 Av r10509b OOkD U. IVE SUOJECr PROVEniY AVVEAnSElO L(E Ix EL000 20uE % N ? REVIG IOr. 911. eU(NSf 19, 19Yr. OAIk UI I. R.N. IrvOE%: AAVGUbi It. 1U9:. IIIIII Its CLIII IFtGA- LI I L n[F>? I IIVnllAfllr, A12,U`J C. ETEIISON, IHC. C-IPICn1E 4l ALIT ..UNV LV NUI vnL10 UNLEUU ENUVUGEU Nl,ri ELUTING UUIIV Er lrH 5 DLn1 T Pq? a/c To .-A w R%x •. r w . °.rzF NAtn "' a°° : m.ruv c¢Arncrz Now?,T,rr ,r . wur, vT rnAC%In r ° .ul. s ms. RR' R Roa?o T,sS V'oR PL.gN T[ly • cTR , i•lq r¢? 51RC+ beT~RO Ro0 Q G4F' LBtl ?aeo n/ ?c<qqr F/. o ra KA/.nn TZC/liFS ? ?YNaL1r 7tc? s t,<o ,Emwae/e. y s..w-?? lrir ?:vs? .r..er C=.•,.?,rwv G. -[. Tele js , .9na PROressoxAL lum aURVermq FIAHIAMO a caNSwrala aemJlces r as GuLE TO EnrRi 4enaulw,lTaa. FL aana t IWRN ORDER W SHEET / OF? . ~E 15 JOE 15 EAST I P OUTt-i , RAN V~I~J S I-~ 29 S ION 15,T0 SECT 1 D T~ FLoR • NELLP~ ~ COUN , P1 , ' ' . ~ Fc M . 4,. x 4 4.. iJ.E. CORNEF~ LOT Q :F~ LoT ! . .~.,5 R.N. PAD6£TT'$ W ' SuOV?V15ioN ALSO ~N AL50 n LEGAL UESC}?1PTIUtd: T ~ t~tNC~ THt: S.E• Q i.E• Q, r . !n CORNEi~ OR LOT 24, v r~ LOT 24, V 1HE SUUTH it FEET OF LOT 2, ALL OF LUT 3, AIJU TtJE J:AST 5k) PRgPE~ o,- '0 ~ d O1- Q FEET OF LUT n, OF n SUE3UIVISIUN OF LUTS 2U, ZI AhlD 22, R. 11. ' A. J, MCK~RE, P, D. t 2, 0 Vi PG. 24. ,t?D. t2, P4IDGET71u•5UfiUIVISIUN, ACL'URUING 'f0 111E h1AP UR PLAT TIIEREUF pi 7j nS f2ECURUE[? 1N PLAT BUUK 9, PAGE 11U UP THE PUE3LIC RECURUS~UF N l~ E'iNEl.Ln5 CUUIJTY, FLURIUA, ~ i ~I~ z v ~ Q~1Il ' ~ ~ Q SU!IVkYUR'S tIU}ES: . a~ Q1 ~ t,, gE:AHiPIGS nRE ASSUIdLU ntJU E?UrAiEU IU THF. hJURTNCffLY f?1(;Idl- ' ~ ~ ~ OF-WAY LIPJE OF CLE'VF.LANU STREET, A1.50 OEING THE SUUI'(IEf?LY (DENT ~IRC~~6,,, a, II E3UIltJDARY LINE OF THE SUk3JECr PItUPERTY OF THI5 SUR`JE:Y. :inlU (DENT) z ~ r ASSUMED E3EnRItJG f3EIhJG S 9U°UU'UU" E. - 3 S" P/C D.4 ' NORTH ~ F/ 0.1O' NO Tl•~ riR C / > t.6' EAST c ~ Tl~ ~ l.. "THIS SURVEY DUL.S MUT REf~LECT UR UEif:RMIIJE OWNkf2SHIt'. L X9.15 C ~ f. ~ W 3. N0 UNUERGRUUhJU CUtJSTRUGTIUN LUCATEU UNLESS GTtiERW15E zo9.0 CPS ~ F Z . S 89 58 19 C NU1kU. / W n, UIMEN51O1J;i 5}iUwN Art E: itJ FF:Ei.nNU UEa;IMAL PnttTS ?HL•E?E:UF. ~P 1 E/P GAS 5, TIJIS SURVEY REFLECTS ni.L EASLt4ENTS SNUWN AS EXCEf>TICNJS" °2 'p " ~ tvSETEF~ SOO 8 5 ~ ~ _ u/r= ~ o ~ ~ 'EFL ~ 7 SCFIL•'UULE T3 - SECTIUIT II OF TITLE CUMh1ITt4E:NT NUh1f1ER CA 54035 WE2ITTEhJ E3Y OLU f2EPU©LIC NATIONAL TITLE IIJSURntJCE lo.G6"CFA N8 59 33 E 40.13~(F / ' Wa { 1.0 CP) 31.0 CUMPAtJ'f. EFFECTIVE: UATE: JANUARY 10, 'ZOU1. NO EAS}it4Etdl::i 4O.O~CP) ~ HO gcCESS 8.• J U ~ ~ SNUWN 1N SAIU TITLE COMMITMEEJT. 6. HAVING CUNSUL'?EU F.I.R. MAP CUMhJUtJITY -PANEL tJUMl3ET? SiRC SiRCC5/e„~ 1~ SEE ' W J O 1250ia5 0015 D, THE SUE3JECT PROPC•RTY APPEnRS TU I.IE: ltd WEST 40 F'T: ~ ~ t9 p r,o'tt+ 2 > Q r FLODU ZUIJF: X. MAP REV15i(ltJ UA'rE: AUGUST 19, 14191. Un'IL OF F'.I.R.M, 1tJDEX: AUGUST 1l1, 1992. ' FlOT4 " ~/o O i~ LO I. ) I. ~ Q,~ 2G, 9 ' ~ ~ ~ u f~MovE U z~. i' . ~ ASPh1A~~" i Z SURVLYUJ2'S CERTIFICnTE: 1NSf f . ,r•U-l. SOP TO v $Y~2uCiS ~Q,U~ ~ J '7 ~ i HE:RF.I?Y i.E?11' rV1n( TIfIS S(fRVfY WnS hin(?E IIPI!!}R MY ~?1 , O > ~ Nkc,r~CY,ISIl3l1 ~H,~+?,'.' An,1 71iAI '>Alli nE1+J41- (il?u(lil!i SURV(~'r' r~'IL ONES R ' ~ ti.3. 26 8' ~ i hEfi?';f.)IlFfGr 1~'!'!ir QFSI f;r t;r i''It!dt},?t;;. 26 8' - ~ UIa N ~ k.ilH ARC nC~ JhnT.: ~ r~'~,.i ili.l.li f" Al,,) ]ii.1l ?r1FRL /i!ir, ff'J i:JISRUACht•11NI~i t•!,(,!`4~+ , t3LDG. C:Otj. ~n J 4' O.Yj' CLEAR '9 F~~G :ith.'V,'hl. 1 Fl1R'1'llEil CE!?Tif"( 'lllnr tHi`.i ;iUR'JLY hl( (;.1.'.; lfi!. ' '~IJCG ~ ~ ~ ' E;CI{t+i CAk:~ ;i (A!IilAiil?y 11,i SF ~ ! :,i4; l i~ lt'i 1 N~ l3',)nRr Ir f?i~t •I i ~ 1 i ~ ~ 1 lrrl (1, ar 1, `I.rl:;,,1'I l..L ~ 1~1NITE PIIC 1'JI ~rv.tt.'~ iii r.nc•If.l? ' f. I • ~ v ~ r ~ r ~ ~ 61~JNITE A1C ~P ~ W T~ VG i • U lSY N \ ` fRLUfI{ICK 5. BnCI}MnN(J, ('L. P.S.M. u511ri \ ` _ C."A _PE'I'EttSUN; 1hJC:`CERTIFICATE Uf' AUTHURILATIui!- a3ESfltL- N . . ~ ¢ ~ / ~ ~ ~ a ONE STO 3 ~ 9 I D R I z MASONRY ~ q l: 2' ' <='12 ~ I Q SURVEY NUT VALIU UNk.ESS EM}30SSEU'+JI1~H SIGPIING SURVC-YOft'S 5EAl. 2 3 8 i .5. ~ J ~ ~ i SAN ~ \ . ~ . • , . , , R - COVERED ~ \v ~ EN;s7ANCE t~ , W,, . M ~P o o ~ , N ~ t4 LOT 3 p o o ~ ~ 7 r • 408 lt1 / Q (NvT~ ~ 0 ~ U C7(C~G~ vJ CO .LOT 7 FTID, X•CUT z _ _ _ _ ~ . R ~ , BROKEN BLDG. COR: ~ - / ~ ~ tL (P~ ) 0.6' cL / G~ (2, •t 3 ~ .4 J'~ 155.. A EAR RCT ~ PL i Q0, ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ' 30n Ir1 i-IGlc~i~i, i \ { S ~ C •~O~L.P. f L ~~Ti,~'i~' a Ta r / S Epp 169.0 , o CONC• 5/ 1~g.W , . 7 F~ ~ C)0 ~ ~ . E 203 O C S S 90 00 DD • 203.0 " (p) No ~'N¢~. wTSZ. o ,'CONC. ~i9/~9 ~ZC/~/IS ~ ~Naz1~~' 7ZC1~.4S . ~s n 3n3S~ E/P Jr) (Zu ~S S M'1'R. STORM ~ C.Li. J8 z' cuR~ ~ l=id ~,~irrc L -a~~.,~irY ~il'.~~' c'.r ~v.G.,o.,t • . r, M.N. ~ coNC. r ~ ~ , ~u~R flc~s~~ y ~aLG/wlf.4 ~ Gv'oGC/w/lyt ~?c~ ~[i?9v~:w~s G.l. G.l. GGD ~C~,e~L/C. /l//!y'/c~iva~ r~TL.E' ,~ln/.~c/~~a C°n.~.~.'tdf' a ~p • 4 i 11~ r~DSU9PI aG . EXCLCp 3~ 1 IrJ HEIGHT Chi ru ~ HALT PAVEMENT ~VEMENT ' . EV L 0 STREET Asp c~ E AN R1W VARIES -ro B/C o E3 / C 59.0 dJC \ • m u ~T _ I~ ~ _ ABBREVIATION LEGEND F • FIELD DATA FIR .FOUND IRON' ROD WV .WATER VALVE MAS .MASONRY P PLAT DATA FPP .FOUND PINCHED PIPE 11YD ¦ FIRE IIYDRANT C1A • GUY ANClIOR ~h i 2 c~ 5 2 I.~'C R RECORD DATA FOP .FOUND OPEti PIPE IW . D GEED DATA PCP PERMANENT CONTROL POINT B/C BACKIIOF CURSES R/N RIGETOFFPNVEMENT C ¦ CALCULATED DATA FCM FtlUND CONCRETE MONUMENT U/B ¦ UTILITY DOK C/5 ON R 0 AY PG + Page Inl SIR ¦ SET IRON ROD E CAP LB ]889 FIC • FSNCE CORNER CONC • CONCRETE SLAB. ~ ,~eferson, .~nc. o . . ' OR . OFFICAL RECORD BOOK LB CORPORATE CERTIFICATE ~ U/P + UTILITY POLE 5/W .SIDEWALK PROFESSIO 425 GULF TO BAY IBVLD. CLEARWATERN FL 33 55 SERVICES PB • PLAT BOOK ~ PLS • PROFESSIONL LARD SURVEYOR P/B PATIO BLOCK ~ Q. CENTERLINE W/F WOOD FENCE ~ RLS ¦ REGISTERED GAND SURVEYOR PC + POINT DF CURVE PKN L D .PARKER KAYLON {727)4469568 ' • CLF .CHAIN LINK FENCE , PRH .PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT PT POINT OF TANGEtIT NAIL 6 D1SK ' WM r HATER MAIN C(C + COVERED CONCRETE WORK ORDER Noll..-~ SHEET ~ OF~ R ~ FlgILROn`D Tl6S ~R PLANTER. ~ R DATE DRAWN SCALE APbPROVED PLTF+t = PLANTCIR, ' ~ OD .CAP' LB d~ 388g . Z dL.pJ CHECKED /N~^(~Q ~ QG f ~O , SIRC SET IRON 1~ ~ /d