FLD2005-07064
Clearwater
U
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #: ?LZZOO?"-?-? t?(o
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
....,r SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $1,205.00
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 04-05-05)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Coates 1, Inc. ;? r?
MAIL.INGADDRESS: C`j I L ^'q LSIPL tQfA0L= , r-Le IQk)ATL=Je, FL 331f8
PHONE NUMBER: 727-385-8527 FAX NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Coates 1. Inc.
(Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6)
AGENT NAME: Keith E. Zavac. P.E., RLA
MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road. Ste 404. Safety Harbor, FL 34695
PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855
CELL NUMBER:
E-MAIL ADDRESS: keith(akeithzayac.com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 621 Bay Esplanade
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached
(if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal)
PARCEL NUMBER: See Attachment A
PARCEL SIZE:
(acres, squard feet)
PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 13 condominium units
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attachment B
Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D.
I-, ?
1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
See Attachment C
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
See Attachment C
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
See Attachment C
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See Attachment C
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
See Attachment C
f
;/?
1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
See Attachment D
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
• •
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
See Attachment D
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
See Attachment D
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
See Attachment D
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
See Attachment D
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
See Attachment D
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
See Attachment D
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
See Attachment D
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
See Attachment D
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
See Attachment D
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im
addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance
the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exam
to this requirement.
If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the
City manual.
Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
? Acknottwlledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
A Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall
be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
LE SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces)- Prior to
f-(fir the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
70G SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
- All required sight triangles;
_._. Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
_ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
" ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
_ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible;
? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
H, LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
? LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed
landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) (color rendering if possible);
? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project.
? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/s X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs
shall include the street address (numerals)
? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
? Reduced signage proposal (8'/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is
on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning
Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway
legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
x Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
L. SIGNATURE:
1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
Signature of property owner or representative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Swom to and subscribed before me this -O?A day of
o i A.D. 20 0 Y- to me and/or by
who is personally known has
produced as
identifi tion.
Nota public,
My commission expires: ®?
LESLIE F. NOVAK
/COMWSSION # DD367467
EXPIRES: DEC. 11, 2008
Bonded Tbru Atlantic Bonding Co., lad
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive lnfill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
(Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names)
1. That (1 am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
Marysia Coates cto Coates 1, Inc.
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
See attachment E for list of requests
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Keith F 72yac o r= R LA
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned an officer duly commiss
a c personally appeared
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the
My Commission Expires: 1-? . /' p r
STATE OF FLORIDA,
laws of the State of Florida, on this 7'" 4 U y?G- day of
who having been first duly swom
oritgnts of the affidavWMt he/she signed.
NOTARY puBUC-MTE OF FLORIDA
LESLIE F. NOVAK
CoNtWSSION # DD307467 Notary Public
EXPIus: DEC. 11, 2009
Bonded Tbm Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc.
S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewftxible development comprehensive in811 application 2005.doc
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $1,205.00
a
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
x NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 04-05-05)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Coates 1, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: --879- 6 i BT-?,4 ESPIJV-,iAID .
PHONE NUMBER: 727-385-8527 FAX NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Coates 1. Inc.
(Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6)
AGENT NAME: Keith E. Zavac. P.E., RLA
MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road Ste 404, Safety Harbor, FL 34695
PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855
CELL NUMBER:
E-MAIL ADDRESS: keith(a)keithzavac.com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS of subject site:_ 621 Bay Esplanade
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached
(if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal)
PARCEL NUMBER: See Attachment A
h 3
PARCEL SIZE: =L ?'_fL , I > ???
(acres, squar feet)
PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 13 condominium units
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attachment B
Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
i ?
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D.
?
1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in'detail:
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
See Attachment C
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
See Attachment C
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
See Attachment C
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See Attachment C
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
See Attachment C
?
1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
See Attachment D
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
See Attachment D
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
See Attachment D
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
See Attachment D
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
See Attachment D
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
See Attachment D
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
See Attachment D
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
See Attachment D
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
See Attachment D
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
See Attachment D
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Crit
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im
addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan. that demonstrates compliance
the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem
to this requirement.
If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the
City manual.
Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall
be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to
the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
? GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
- All required setbacks;
- All existing and proposed points of access;
- All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
Location of existing public and priV-wre utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
_ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) and color rendering if possible;
O FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
? LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed
landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11) (color rendering if possible);
? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the -Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
l J
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN'WBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project.
? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs
shall include the street address (numerals)
? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
? Reduced signage proposal (8 %X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is
on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning
Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-5624750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway
legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
x Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (721) 562-4750.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
Signature of property owner or representative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of
u ; A.D. 20 0 i r to me and/or by
L? who is personally known has
produced as
identifi tion.
N tao ry public,
My commission expires:
d LESLIE F. NOYAK
cOMWSS10N # DD367467
)MBEs; DEC. 11, 2008
W/
Bonded Tbfu Adzndc Bonding Co., Iai.
Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
(Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
Marysia Coates c/o Coates 1, Inc.
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
See attachment E for list of requests
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: k°i+ E Zayac, P E , RI A
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Own6*r; ;.-y
Property Owner
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned ,-an officer duly commissioned by t k laws of the State of Florida, on this y f C'ti'C day of
e ' personally appeared , . k-l'oka. C-k who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the cont nth s of the affidavitt t he/she signed.
NO PUBLIC-STATE OF FLORIDA
ry LESLIE F. NOVAK o r t 't C?-? •-:
M Commission Expires: y. ?CO TNUSSION # DM7467 Notary Public
y ? ?. - .. L bX im: DEC. 11, 2008
Bonded Thru Atlantic Bonding Co,, Inc.
S:IPlanning DepartmenttApplication Formsldevelopment revieWexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infrll Application 2005-- City of Clearwater
ATTACHMENT A
PARCEL NUMBERS
05/29/15/54756/078/0050
• 0
ATTACHMENT B
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS
• Increase in height from 35 ft to 53'-3" from FEMA to roof top slab. Mechanical
cover extends 5'-17/8" above slab in center of building.
• Termination of non-conformance for 18 existing overnight accommodations and
conversion to 13 multi-family condominiums.
• Reduction in rear setback from 20 feet to 15 feet.
•
0
ATTACHMENT C
GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining
the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent mid-rise properties. The
existing surrounding properties are generally low and mid-rise older apartment
buildings. Due to FEMA constrains regarding redevelopment of existing
structures the new development will include an at grade parking garage with units
above. The proposed project density is a new 13 unit multifamily project that will
remain consistent with the existing density of 18 motel units. The proposed
project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach with the proposed
Mediterranean architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain
the small-scale multi-family character of the neighborhood. The project does not
deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed
13 condominium units. The character of the project is an upscale condominium
development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The project is in
character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the three previously
approved Napenthe, LaRisa I and LaRisa II projects. In addition the project stays
within 10% of the 50-foot definition of mid-rise building heights.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and
proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of
other properties on Bay Esplanade, and set a positive example for the
redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when
appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and
will likely be enhanced by the development of the project.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The 13 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and replaces the
existing 18-unit motel development. There are no proposed uses other than
residential that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion
The parking is designed within a fully within the project site and use only one 24-
foot wide driveway. There is no proposed on street parking associated with the
0
project. The proposed 20 parking spaces meets the required parking spaces
required by code.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The surrounding parcels along Bay Esplanade are primarily multi-family
apartment developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with
no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance
the community character of the immediate vicinity by conforming with Spanish
Mission flavor suggested by City code.
6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts.
The project minimizes visual and acoustic impacts through the following:
• The project includes an upgraded landscape package replacing a project
with virtually non-existent landscaping to accent the architecture and
buffer the site from adjacent properties for privacy and noise reduction.
• The project takes all outside existing parking and puts the 20 parking
spaces in a fully enclosed parking garage to eliminate the visual and
acoustic impacts of parked cars.
• The mechanical equipment is removed from grade, placed on top of the
building and fully enclosed with a high top cover. This cover ' will
virtually eliminate all visual and acoustic impacts to the surrounding
neighborhood.
• The pool area is removed from grade and placed on the fourth floor to
eliminate acoustic impact to the surrounding area.
0 0
ATTACHMENT D
RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
CRITERIA
ll. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development
is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and
development standards.
The applicant is requesting an increase in height from 35'-0" to 53'-3" feet, and a
reduction in the rear setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. The property is an existing
older motel property with a front minimum width of 101.85 ft. The footprint and
height of the building is designed to include 13 condominium units, which is
consistent with the existing density of 18 motel units, and the minimum required
20 parking spaces. The units are sized in conformance with current marketable
standards. These conditions were then designed into a building to be within 10%
of the 50 foot height generally recognized as mid-rise. A building with less
height or depth could not practically hold the allowed units and still provide the
City required parking.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive
infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting
properties.
Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will
be enhanced by the development of this project. The adjacent properties are older
apartments and multi-family structures. The construction of a new condominium
building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting
properties, as well as increase the fair market value. The anticipated sale costs of
each unit are well in excess of $600,000, which will increase the property values
of the neighborhood.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The proposed request for condominiums is consistent with both the existing
zoning and future land use of the subject property and adjoining parcels.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment
project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
The proposed use of the property is consistent with adjacent land uses as multi-
family. The recently approved developments near this project along with the
existing uses of the surrounding land uses are generally multi-family. The use I's
consistent with the City tourist zoning designation and County Future Land Use
designation
i i
a. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses
within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise
available in the City of Clearwater.
The owner is committed to develop their property to its best and highest use that
is compatible with recently approved developments in the area. This development
is possible since the property is currently owned by the developer and land costs
due to other approved projects make the development impractical in other areas.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive
infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
The immediate vicinity consists of older multi-family structures, several of which
will be torn down to construct recently approved projects. The development of
this project will upgrade the surrounding building appearances by using.Mission
Spanish themed architecture, as well as a fully landscaped property with palm
trees and shrubs. The project also eliminates perpendicular parking from the
public road, which is still currently in use on the immediately adjacent properties.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project
creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed investment made in the property by removal of older buildings and
replacing with new construction will benefit the immediate area aesthetically,
increase the property values of adjacent property, stimulate the redevelopment of
adjacent property, and provide a viable to increase the tax base of the City.
The aesthetic character of the community will also be enhanced by the
architecture of the building with fully landscaped grounds. The landscaping
includes a combination of palms, hedges and shrubs, which fully encompass the
property.
The building height while accommodating the allowable density, is minimized to
within 10% of the 50 foot mid-rise definition. The height is less than other
approved projects within the area, and attempts to minimize shade impacts to the
surrounding areas.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
1A
• 0
Flexibility in regard to a height increase is requested for this project. The
property is currently owned by the applicant and is working with their existing
property constraints to create a project that fits the property and is consistent with
other recently approved projects within the area.
The existing immediate vicinity currently utilizes backout parking within the
right of way, which severely limits the capacity of the existing roadway. The
proposed project proposes to take the parking and move it all into an enclosed
parking garage under the living units. This will enhance the capacity of the
existing roadway and eliminate the visual degradation of the area by exterior
parking.
The landscaping in the existing vicinity is very limited and is severely stressed in
many cases. This property has proposed landscaping in all open space areas
except for the required sodded stormwater treatment ponds. The landscaping
includes taller palm trees, intermediate shrubs and lower groundcover that
surrounds the building and mitigates for the height flexibility.
The building height is offset by the stepped facade of the building along with the
enhanced Spanish Mission theme. The current architecture of the vicinity is dated
without the City preferred theme. The building height is maintained within 10%
of the fifty foot mid-rise definition.
The rear setback reduction from 20 feet to 15 feet does not impact an adjacent
property or remainder of the neighborhood since the site backs up to the bay. The
setback does not reduce visibility triangles to the water from adjacent properties.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-
street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required
parking per standard code would be provided on-site.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown
District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable)
The "Old Florida" district is an area of transition between resorts and low
intensity. The mix of uses favor residential rather than retail. Densities in the
area should be generally limited to the density of existing buildings and should be
low to mid-rise. Lack of parking hinders revitalization of existing improvements
particularly on Bay Esplanade.
The proposed building consists of a medium-density 18 unit multi-family project
and does not include any retail uses. The density of the project is less than
0 0
required by the Tourist district and with 18 units is consistent with the existing
motel density of 18 units. The building being 53'-3" ft above FEMA to slab is
within 10% of the 50 foot mid-rise elevation, and would generally be considered
as a mid-rise building consistent with other recently approved projects which have
set a standard of development. The project includes all required parking on-site
and within the building to revitalize the integrity and capacity of Bay Esplanade.
The architecture of the building is generally Spanish Mission in nature, which is
consistent with the remainder of the tourist district with significant undulating
architectural features. The architecture is enhanced by the proposed palm trees,
which soften the corners of the building and provide a vegetative scale to the
structure. The colors of the building are consistent with the recently approved
projects along the beach and do not include any wild or obtrusive colors.
a '
A
0
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc.
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning
Ebb Tide Stormwater Narrative
0
701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
keith@keithzayac.com
The stormwater system is designed to treat the first 3/4" of runoff from the site through the
use of a normally dry treatment pond. After treatment the pond is designed to discharge
through the sea wall into Clearwater Bay.
Tampa Hard Rock Resort
100-440
WQPNDA POND 1
Water Quality Treatment
Treatment Pond
Project: Ebb Tide Condominiums
Basin Area: 0.37 Ac
Runoff (in): 0.75 in
Top of Bank El.: 5.7 Ft
Area @ T.O.B.: 0.08 Ac
NWL : 4.7 Ft
Increment: 0.5 Ft
Side Slopes: 4 : 1
Area Avg. Area Volume Acc. Vol. Trt. Vol.
Elevation (Ac) (Ac) (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) DL W
4.70 0.07 0.00000
0.07 0.04 0.0231 5.32
5.70 0.08 0.03738
Required Treatment Volume: 0.02313 Ac - Ft
Calculated DLW: 5.31862 Ft
Prepared by 15643 0
s
0
TR-55
1 of 1
8/12/2005
t
Line Items:
Case No
1
Check DEL MAR DEVLPT LLC R_D 6142
In Person
Payment Total:
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT.
This is a receipt for an application for a permit.
This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application.
600.00
$600.00
cReceipt.rpt
Receipt #: 1200500000000006389
Date: 07/08/2005
7/8/2005
11:32:43AM
Tran Code Description
Revenue Account No
Amount Paid
PLT2005-00018 Preliminary Plat 010-341240 600.00
Line Item Total: $600.00
Payments:
Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF CLEA TER
APPLICATION FOR PL"AT APPROVAL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2nd FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME 4015h 3l- -1-11R '2.NflT'1C AIA-ti- („ L. t P, Vn-S.t )OqdG
ADDRESS 5I 4 (05-6- 164t F-S-P,4-140r- a' 6-b kio \ _ kh -
PHONE NUMBER ??zNzl YG "? ' 0 7-3,3 FAX NUMBER : CEa7 1 ?6 " 0 .3 2
APPLICANTS NAME C X31 QA,y??-44t 6,L-
ADDRESS #j. /W+'r:,. L'l-w- F c- 33i, s'
PHONE NUMBER (7o;-q) y6 'O -730 FAX NUMBER /? l7;? -41 J y6 7 "o -7 3 Z
AGENT NAMEC?.??l-tL ?$? V, P•
ADDRESS : G0 N. F-6. I'v'r t'3 0.-j /Q-J-9. ?GLV. FL_ 7,f f
PHONE NUMBER 'ia* -O T30 FAX NUMBER g6'77 -0 732-
1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all
representations made in this application
are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
by R o 6e- t- - -;Lgxx z who is personally known to
or
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before mg_this 7 day of
t ° s to me and/or
me or has produced
as i ntification.
Notary Public / j
my commission expires:
Gregory A. Fox
Fourteen (14) co es of t_he_ preliminary plat must be submitted:. Commission # DD338456
' ., ' - Expires August 5, 2008
The .P, ema.dTroy Fam-bMnnmInc. 806.3!&7078
preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape arNitect or engineer drawn to a scale
not smaller t an 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following informations
NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE;
TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED;
NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT;
IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES;
EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS;
PROPOSED STREET NAMES;
NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS;
1
V1
?'1
40
DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING:
ril
THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT
STREETS
RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS;
COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY
N M
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2°d FLOOR
PHONE (727)-5624567 FAX (727) 5624576
INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL OF
FINAL PLAT INSTRUCTIONS
The final plat shall be suitable for recording at the office of the clerk of the circuit court. It
shall be prepared and sealed buy a land surveyor registered by the state and shall conform
with the requirements of Florida Statute, Chapter 177, and the requirements of this
subsection. It shall be drawn at a scale of one inch equals 50 feet or other scale determined
appropriate by the city engineer. The overall sheet size of the plat shall be consistent with the
standards established by the clerk of the circuit court for recording. Each sheet shall be
provided with a one-inch margin on each of three sides and a three-inch margin on the left
side of the plat for binding purposes.
Eighteen (18) copies of the Final Plat must be submitted.
ALL FINAL PLATS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
NAME OF PLAT;
LOCATION OF THE PLAT BY U.S. SURVEY SYSTEM AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING SECTION,
TOWNSHIP, RANGE, COUNTY AND STATE;
NAMES OF EXISTING STREETS ABUTTING RO GIVING ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED PLAT;
ALL PLAT BOUNDARIES BASED ON AN ACCURATE TRANSVERSE, WITH ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR
DIMENSIONS SHOWN. ERROR OF ENCLOSURE OF SUCH BOUNDARY SURVEY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE
FOOT FOR EACH 10,000 FEET OF PERIMETER SURVEY;
ALL BLOCKS, LOTS, STREETS, CROSSWALKS, EASEMENTS AND WATERWAYS, WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO
THE PLAT, ALL OF WHICH SHALL HAVE ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS GIVEN AND ALL RADII,
INTERNAL ANGLES, BEARINGS, POINTS OF CURVATURE, TANGENTS AND LENGTHS OF ALL CURVES, SO
THAT NO DIMENSIONS OR DATA ARE MISSING WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION OF ANY
OF THE CORNERS OR BOUNDARIES OF BLOCKS, LOTS OR STREETS, AS LISTED ABOVE. WHEN ANY LOT OR
PORTION OF THE PLAT IS BOUNDED BY AN IRREGULAR LINE, THE MAJOR PORTION OF THAT LOT OR PLAT
SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A WITNESS LINE SHOWING COMPLETE DATA, WITH DISTANCES ALONG SUCH
LINES EXTENDED BEYOND THE ENCLOSURE TO THE IRREGULAR BOUNDARY SHOWN WITH AS MUCH
CERTAINTY AS CAN BE DETERMINED OR AS "MORE OR LESS", IF VARIABLE. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE
GIVEN TO THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT. TRUE ANGLES AND DISTANCES SHALL BE DRAWN TO
THE NEAREST ESTABLISHED OFFICIAL MONUMENTS, NOT LESS THAN THREE OF WHICH SHALL BE
ACCURATELY DESCRIBED ON THE PLAT. THE INTENDED USE OF ALL EASEMENTS SHALL BE CLEARLY
STATED.
CURVILINEAR LOTS SHALL SHOW ARC DISTANCES, AND RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING. RADIAL LINES
SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED. DIRECTION OF NONRADIAL LINES SHALL BE INDICATED;
SUFFICIENT ANGLES AND BEARINGS SHALL IDENTIFY THE DIRECTION OF ALL LINES AND SHALL BE SHOWN
TO THE NEAREST SECOND;
N M
ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINES SHALL BE SHOWN WITH DISTANCES, ANGLES, BEARINGS OR AZIMUTH,
POINTS OF CURVATURE, POINTS OF TANGENCY, POINTS OF REVERSE CURVATURE, POINTS OF COMPOUND
CURVATURE, ARC DISTANCE, CENTRAL ANGLES, TANGENTS, RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING OR
AZIMUTH, OR BOTH
ALL EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES OR UTILITIES, AND ANY
LIMITATIONS OF SUCH EASEMENTS;
ALL LOT NUMBERS AND LINES. LOT LINES SHALL BE MARKED WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS IN FEET AND
HUNDREDTHS OF FEET, AND BEARINGS OR ANGLES TO STREET LINES;
ACCURATE DESCRIPTIONS OF ANY AREA TO BE DEDICATED OR RESERVED FOR PUBLIC USE WITH THE
PURPOSE INDICATED THEREON;
TITLE, DATE OF SURVEY, GRAPHIC SCALE OF MAP AND NORTH ARROW. THE BEARING OR AZIMUTH
REFERENCE SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT IN THE NOTES OR LEGEND;
PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF
THE SATE OF FLORIDA;
EACH PLAT SHALL SHOW A DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDS PLATTED, AND THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE THE
SAME IN THE TITLE CERTIFICATION. THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE SO COMPLETE THAT FROM IT, WITHOUT
REFERENCE TO THE PLAT, THE STARTING POINT AND BOUNDARY CAN BE DETERMINED;
THE CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S CERTIFICATE AND THE LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND SEAL; ALL
SECTION LINES AND QUARTER SECTION LINES OCCURRING IN THE MAP OR PLAT SHALL BE INDICATED BY
LINES DRAWN UPON THE MAP OR PLAT, WITH APPROPRIATE WORDS AND FIGURES. IF THE DESCRIPTION
IS BY METES AND BOUNDS, THE POINT OF BEGINNING SHALL BE INDICATED, TOGETHER WITH ALL
BEARINGS AND DISTANCES OF THE BOUNDARY LINES. IF THE PLATTED LANDS ARE IN A LAND GRANT OR
ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUBDIVISION OF GOVERNMENT SURVEYS, THEN THE BOUNDARIES ARE TO BE
DEFINED BY METES AND BOUNDS AND COURSES. THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE DESCRIPTION SHALL
BE TIED TO THE NEAREST GOVERNMENT CORNER OF OTHER RECORDED AND WELL-ESTABLISHED
CORNER;
ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY PLAT TITLE, PLAT BOOK AND PAGE OR, IF
UNPLATTED, LAND SHALL BE SO DESIGNED. IF THE AREA PLATTED IS A REPLATTING OF A PART OR THE
WHOLE OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT, SUFFICIENT TIES SHALL BE SHOWN TO CONTROLLING LINES
APPEARING ON THE EARLIER PLAT TO PERMIT AN OVERLAY TO BE MADE AND REFERENCE TO THE
REPLATTING SHALL BE STATED AS A SUBTITLE FOLLOWING THE NAME OF THE PLAT WHEREVER IT
APPEARS ON THE PLAT;
ALL LOTS SHALL BE NUMBERED EITHER BY PROGRESSIVE NUMBERS OR, IF IN BLOCKS, PROGRESSIVELY
NUMBERED OR LETTERED IN EACH BLOCK, EXCEPT THAT BLOCKS IN NUMBER ADDITIONS BEARING THE
SAME NAME MAY BE NUMBERED CONSECUTIVELY THROUGHOUT THE SEVERAL ADDITIONS;
PARK, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PARCELS SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED;
ALL INTERIOR EXCEPTED PARCELS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND LABELED 'NOT A PART OF THIS
PLAT";
THE PURPOSE OF ALL AREAS DEDICATED MUST BE CLEARLY INDICATED OR STATED ON THE PLAT;
WHEN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SHOW CURVE DETAIL INFORMATION ON THE MAP, A TABULAR FORM MAY
BE USED.
w
M
THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL PLAT:
A TITLE OPINION OF AN ATTORNEY LICENSED IN THE SATE OR A CERTIFICATION BY AN ABSTRACTOR OR A
TITLE COMPANY STATING THAT THE COURT RECORDS IDENTIFY THAT THE TITLE TO THE LAND AS
DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON THE PLAT IS IN THE NAME OF THE PERSON EXECUTING THE DEDICATION. IN
ADDITION, A DOCUMENT ENTITLED CONSENT TO PLATTING OF LANDS AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF
MORTGAGE SHALL BE FILED TOGETHER WITH THE FINAL PLAT FOR EACH PERSON OR CORPORATION
HOLDING A MORTGAGE ON ALL LAND INCLUDED ON THE PLAT, WHERE SUCH PERSON HAS NOT SIGNED
THE FINAL PLAT. THE TITLE OPINION OR CERTIFICATION SHALL SHOW ALL MORTGAGES NOT SATISFIED OR
RELEASED OF RECORD NOR OTHER WISE TERMINATED BY LAW;
CERTIFICATION BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR THAT THE PLAT REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY
THAT INDIVIDUAL, THAT ALL THE NECESSARY SURVEY MONUMENTS, LOT SIZES AND LOT DIMENSIONS ARE
CORRECTLY SHOWN THEREON, AND THAT THE PLAT COMPLIES WITH ALL OF THE SURVEY REQUIREMENTS
OF CHAPTER 177 AND THIS DEVELOPMENT CODE. IMPRESSED ON THE PLAT AND AFFIXED THERETO SHALL
BE THE PERSONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE TO THE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR INCLUDING THE
REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE SURVEYOR, BY WHOM OR UNDER WHOSE AUTHORITY AND DIRECTION
THE PLAT WAS PREPARED;
A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PLATTED LANDS. HOWEVER, A NEW BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR A REPLAT IS
REQUIRED ONLY WHEN THE REPLAT AFFECTS ANY BOUNDARY OF THE PREVIOUSLY PLATTED PROPERTY
OR WHEN IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE LANDS TO BE REPLATTED OR ADJOINING LANDS.
THE BOUNDARY SURVEY MUST BE PERFORMED AND PREPARED UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE DIRECTION AND
SUPERVISION OF A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER PRECEDING THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL OF
THE PLAT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY. THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT RESTRICT A LEGAL ENTITY
FROM EMPLOYING ONE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PERFORM AND PREPARE THE
BOUNDARY SURVEY AND ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PREPARE THE PLAT,
EXCEPT THAT BOTH THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND THE PLAT MUST BE UNDER THE SAME LEGAL ENTITY;
CERTIFICATION THAT ALL REAL ESTATE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID;
EVERY PLAT OF A SUBDIVISION OR CONDOMINIUM FILED FOR RECORD SHALL INCLUDE ANY REQUIRED
DEDICATION BY THE APPLICANT. THE DEDICATION SHALL BE EXECUTED BY ALL OWNERS HAVING A
RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND BEING PLATTED, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED
TO BE EXECUTED. ALL MORTGAGEES HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND PLATTED SHALL
EXECUTE, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED, EITHER THE
DEDICATION CONTAINED ON THE PLAT OR IN A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT JOINING THE RATIFICATION OF THE
PLAT AND ALL DEDICATION AND RESERVATIONS THEREON IN THE FORM OF A CONSENT TO PLAT FROM ALL
MORTGAGE INTERESTS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. WHEN A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND HAS
BEEN PLATTED AND A PLAT THEREOF BEARING THE DEDICATION EXECUTED BY THE DEVELOPER AND
APPROVAL OF THE CITY HAS BEEN SECURED AND RECORDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS DIVISION, ALL
STREETS, ALLEYS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC AREAS SHOWN ON SUCH PLAT, UNLESS
OTHERWISE STATED, SHALL BE DETERMINED TO HAVE BEEN DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE USES
AND PURPOSES STATED THEREON, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY SEPARATE ACTION BY RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COMMISSION TO FORMALLY ACCEPT SUCH OFFERS OF DEDICATION;
ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PRIVATE RESTRICTION AND TRUSTEESHIPS AND THEIR PERIODS OF
EXISTENCE SHALL BE FILED AS A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT AND REFERENCE TO SUCH INSTRUMENT SHALL
BE NOTED ON THE FINAL PLAT;
1, ..
M !i
AFTER A FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED, THREE PRINTS OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHOWING THE
IMPROVEMENTS THAT HAVE BEE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION
CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND A COPY OF THE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR COMPLETION OF REQUIRED
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY ENGINEER BEFORE SUCH PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED.
FINANCIAL GUARANTEE: UNLESS ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY
COMPLETED, AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL ACCOMPANY
EVERY PLAT WHICH IS TO BE RECORDED TO ENSURE THE ACTUAL SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF
CONSTRUCTION OF ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN NOT MORE THAN TWO YEARS FOLLOWING
THE DATE OF THE RECORDING, OR ONE YEAR IF SIDEWALKS ARE THE ONLY REQUIRED IMPROVEMENT TO
BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING THE DATE OF RECORDING. AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR
REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE
IMPROVEMENTS, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED IF THE
CITY ENGINEER DETERMINES IT APPROPRIATE AND MAY BE REDUCED FROM TIME TO TIME IN PROPORTION
TO THE WORK COMPLETED, AND MAY TAKE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FORMS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY;
CASH, TO BE HELD IN A SEPARATE ESCROW ACCOUNT BY THE CITY, OR
AN IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT WRITTEN BY A BANK CHARTERED BY THE SATE, THE UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT, OR ANY OTHER STATE OF THE UNITED STATES IF THE BANK IS AUTHORIZED TO DO
BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY MANAGER. THE LETTER OF CREDIT
SHALL INCLUDE AMONG OTHER THINGS, AN EXPIRATION DATE NOT EARLIER THAN ONE YEAR FROM THE
DATE OF ISSUANCE; A PROVISION REQUIRING THE ISSUER OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT TO GIVE AT LEAST
30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CITY PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OR RENEWAL OF THE LETTER; AND A
PROVISION THAT THE LETTER IS AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED FOR A PERIOD OF TIME EQUALING ITS
ORIGINAL TERM OF THE REQUIRED NOTICE IS NOT GIVEN; OR
A SURETY BOND ISSUED BY A SURETY COMPANY AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE. THE
SURETY BOND SHALL INCLUDE, AS A MINIMUM, THE PROVISION REQUIRED FOR LETTERS OF CREDIT.
S:1Planning Department\Application FormsWevelopment review\Plat Approval Application - 6-23-2003.doc
0
ATTACHMENT A
PARCEL NUMBERS
•
05/29/15/54756/078/0050
• i
ATTACHMENT B
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS
• Increase in height from 35 ft to 54 ft from FEMA to midpoint of roof.
• •
ATTACHMENT C
GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulb
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining
the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent properties. The proposed
project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach with the proposed
Mediterranean architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain
the small-scale multi-family character of the neighborhood. The project does not
deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed
13 condominium units. The character of the project is an upscale condominium
development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The project is in
character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the three previously
approved Napenthe, LaRisa I and LaRisa II projects
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and
proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of
other properties on Bay Esplanade, and set a positive example for the
redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when
appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and
will likely be enhanced by the development of the project.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The 13 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and replaces the
existing 18-unit motel development. There are no proposed uses other than
residential that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion
The parking is designed within a fully within the project site and use only one 24-
foot wide driveway. There is no proposed on street parking associated with the
project. The proposed 20 parking spaces meets the required parking spaces
required by code.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
• i
The surrounding parcels along Bay Esplanade are primarily multi-family
apartment developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with
no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance
the community character of the immediate vicinity by conforming with Spanish
Mission flavor suggested by City code.
6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts.
The project minimizes the acoustic and olfactory impacts of the project by
planting landscape buffers and the use of a parking garage with no exterior
parking. The project only contains 13 residential units, and will not include any
commercial or other businesses.
E
r?
LJ
ATTACHMENT D
RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
CRITERIA
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development
is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and
development standards.
The applicant is only requesting an increase in height from 35'-0" to 54 feet. The
property is an existing motel property with a front minimum width of 101.85 ft.
The building width is designed to accommodate a 24 ft wide driveway, 20 19-ft
parking spaces and associated stairs and trash room. The remaining open space,
which exceeds code minimum, is heavily landscaped with minimal grass to offset
the requested setback deviations.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive
infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting
properties.
Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will
be enhanced by the development of this project. The adjacent properties are older
apartments and multi-family structures. The construction of a new condominium
building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting
properties, as well as increase the fair market value. The anticipated sale costs of
each unit are well in excess of $600,000, which will increase the property values
of the neighborhood.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The proposed request for condominiums is consistent with both the existing
zoning and future land use of the subject property and adjoining parcels.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment
project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
The proposed use of the property is consistent with adjacent land uses as multi-
family. The recently approved developments near this project along with the
existing uses of the surrounding land uses are generally multi-family. The use is
consistent with the City tourist zoning designation and County Future Land Use
designation
5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses
within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise
available in the City of Clearwater.
0 0
The owner is committed to develop their property to its best and highest use that
is compatible with recently approved developments in the area. This development
is possible since the property is currently owned by the developer and land costs
due to other approved projects make the development impractical in other areas.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive
infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
The immediate vicinity consists of older multi-family structures, several of which
will be torn down to construct recently approved projects. The development of
this project will upgrade the surrounding building appearances by using Mission
Spanish themed architecture, as well as a fully landscaped property with palm
trees and shrubs. The project also eliminates perpendicular parking from the
public road, which is still currently in use on the immediately adjacent properties.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project
creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed investment made in the property by removal of older buildings and
replacing with new construction will benefit the immediate area aesthetically,
increase the property values of adjacent property, stimulate the redevelopment of
adjacent property, and provide a viable to increase the tax base of the City.
The aesthetic character of the community will also be enhanced by the
architecture of the building with fully landscaped grounds. The landscaping
includes a combination of palms, hedges and shrubs, which fully encompass the
property.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
Flexibility in regard to a height increase is requested for this project. The
property is currently owned by the applicant and is working with their existing
property constraints to create a project that fits the property and is consistent with
other recently approved projects within the area.
The existing immediate vicinity currently utilizes backout parking within the
right of way, which severely limits the capacity of the existing roadway. The
proposed project proposes to take the parking and move it all into an enclosed
parking garage under the living units. This will enhance the capacity of the
r •
existing roadway and eliminate the visual degradation of the area by exterior
parking.
The landscaping in the existing vicinity is very limited and is severely stressed in
many cases. This property has proposed landscaping in all open space areas
except for the required sodded stormwater treatment ponds. The landscaping
includes taller palm trees, intermediate shrubs and lower groundcover that
surrounds the building and mitigates for the height flexibility.
The building height is offset by the stepped fagade of the building along with the
enhanced Spanish Mission theme. The current architecture of the vicinity is dated
without the City preferred theme.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-
street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required
parking per standard code would be provided on-site.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown
District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable)
The "Old Florida" district is an area of transition between resorts and low
intensity. The mix of uses favor residential rather than retail. Densities in the
area should be generally limited to the density of existing buildings and should be
low to mid-rise. Lack of parking hinders revitalization of existing improvements
particularly on Bay Esplanade.
The proposed building consists of a low-density four unit multi-family project and
does not include any retail uses. The density of the project is less than required
by the Tourist district and with only 13 units is below several of the existing
apartment developments in the surrounding area. The building being 54 ft above
FEMA to midroof would generally be considered as a mid-rise building consistent
with other recently approved projects which have set a standard of development.
The project includes all required parking on-site and within the building to
revitalize the integrity and capacity of Bay Esplanade.
The architecture of the building is generally Spanish Mission in nature, which is
consistent with the remainder of the tourist district with significant undulating
architectural features. The architecture is enhanced by the proposed palm trees,
which soften the corners of the building and provide a vegetative scale to the
structure. The colors of the building are consistent with the recently approved
projects along the beach and do not include any wild or obtrusive colors.
Tampa Hard Rock Resort WQPNDA POND 1 Prepared by 15643 '
100-440
Water Quality Treatment
Treatment Pond
Project: Ebb Tide Condominiums
Basin Area:
Runoff (in):
Top of Bank El.:
Area @ T.O.B.:
NWL :
Increment:
Side Slopes:
0.37 Ac
0.75 in
5.7 Ft
0.08 Ac
4.7 Ft
0.5 Ft
4 :1
Area Avg. Area Volume Acc. Vol. Trt. Vol.
Elevation (Ac) (Ac) (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) DLW
4.70 0.07 0.00000
0.07 0.04 0.0231 5.32
5.70 0.08 0.03738
Required Treatment Volume: 0.02313 Ac - Ft
Calculated DLW: 5.31862 Ft
0
0
TR-55 1 of 1 6/30/2005
Stage-Storaae-Perimeter
Project Name: Ebb Tide Condominium
Project Number. [,.
Designer: kez
Date:
Comments:
(fe) (ft) (ft3)
Area @ Top of Bank(TOB): 2,483.3 Elevation: 5.30 Volume: 1,788
Area @ Design High Water(DHW): 1,886.7 Elevation: 4.95 Volume: 1,023
Area @ Design Low Water(DLW): 1,886.7 Elevation: 4.95 Volume: 1,023
Area @ Bottom/Normal Water Level(BOT/NWL): 267.5 Elevation: 4.00 Volume: 0
•
STAGE AREA VOLUME STAGE AREA VOLUME TREATMENT
(ft) (fe) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft3) VOLUME: 1,023 ft3
4.00 267.5 0.0 4.65 1,375.4 534.0
4.03 311.9 7.5 4.68 1,419.7 570.3 ATTENUATION
4.05 356.2 16.2 4.70 1,464.0 607.8 VOLUME:0 ft3
4.08 400.5 26.1 4.73 1,508.4 646.4
4.10 444.8 37.0 4.75 1,552.7 686.2
4.13 489.1 49.2 4.78 1,597.0 727.2
4.16 533.4 62.5 4.81 1,641.3 769.3
4.18 577.7 76.9 4.83 1,685.6 812.5
4.21 622.1 92.5 4.86 1,729.9 856.9
4.23 666.4 109.3 4.88 1,774.2 902.5
4.26 710.7 127.2 4.91 1,818.6 949.2
4.29 755.0 146.2 4.94 1,862.9 997.0
4.31 799.3 166.4 4.96 1,907.2 1,046.0
4.34 843.6 187.8 4.99 1,951.5 1,096.2
4.36 887.9 210.3 5.01 1,995.8 1,147.5 •
4.39 932.3 234.0 5.04 2,040.1 1,200.0
4.42 976.6 258.8 5.07 2,084.4 1,253.6
4.44 1,020.9 284.7 5.09 2,128.8 1,308.4
4.47 1,065.2 311.9 5.12 2,173.1 1,364.3
4.49 1,109.5 340.1 5.14 2,217.4 1,421.4
4.52 1,153.8 369.6 5.17 2,261.7 1,479.6
4.55 1,198.2 400.1 5.20 2,306.0 1,539.0
4.57 1,242.5 431.9 5.22 2,350.3 1,599.5
4.60 1,286.8 464.7 5.25 2,394.7 1,661.2
4.62 1,331.1 498.8 5.27 2,439.0 1,724.0
5.30 2,483.3 1,788.0
Pinellas County Property Apprq* Information: 05/29/15/54756/078/04 Page 2 of 4
05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 078 / 0050
05-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:15:34
Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales
COATES I INC OBK: 07234 OPG: 1325
873 ISLAND WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33767-1826
EVAC: A EUAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 621 BAY ESPLANADE
of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02
f
2002
2003
l
rom
-
:
sa
es
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/Unq) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 3 /1,990 7,23411,325 1,800,000 (M) I
1929: Book 020 Pgs 048- ii/1,984 5,8871 501 1,000,000 (Q) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,972 3,8901 263 275,000 (Q) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0
2004 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 1,100,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000
Gout Exem: NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 191009000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000
Historic Exem: 0
Taxable: 111009006 Agricultural: 0
2004 Tax Information
District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Bay
Clearwater view:
04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
04 Taxes: 25,266. 34
1) 152 x i10 100.00 16,720.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
25, 266.34 6) 0 x 0 . DO . 00
Without any exemptions,
2004 taxes will be
25, 266. 34
Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 78, L OTS 5 AND 6 AS
Description DESC IN PL 20 PG 27
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=05/29/15/5475... 7/5/2005
Pinellas County Property Apprq* Information: 05/29/15/54756/078/0
Page 3 of 4
Property and Land Use Code descriptions
05 / 29 / 15 / 94750 / 078 0050, :01
05-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:15:32
Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type; Motel/Hotel C 4 St
Property Address; 621 BAY ESPLANADE Prop Use; 313 Land Use; 39
S-truc-tural E1q--mE3n-ts
Foundation Spread/Mono Footing
Floor System Slab on Grade
Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco
Height Factor 0
Party Wall None
Structural Frame None
Roof Frame Flat
Roof Cover Built Up/Wood
Cabinet & Mill Average
Floor Finish Carpet Combination
Interior Finish Drywall
Total Units 18
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 63
Bath Tile Floor and Wall
Electric Average
Shape Factor Rectangle
Quality Average
Year Built 1,953
Effective Age 25
Other Depreciation 0
Function Depreciation 0
Economic Depreciation 0
Sub Ar E3a s
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area i. 00 9,936 7) . 00 0
2) Open Porch . 30 2,756 8) . 00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
CQmmE3 rClcxIL ExTra FE3a-t ures
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RC? Year
1) PATIO/DECK 4009F 3. 00 400 1,200 480 1,975
2) ASPHALT 15x200 1.50 3,000 4,500 4,500 999
3) POOL 699SF 25,000. 00 1 25, 000 10.000 1.975
4) SHUFBDCT 312SF 1,000.00 1 1,000 11000 999
5) DOCK 922SF 20. 00 922 18,440 7,380 1.975
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 23,360
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=05/29/15/5475... 7/5/2005
rI
rrr?l G1?? 14!
LONG FANGF PLANNING
DFVROP,MENT REVIEW
February 21, 2007
Mr. Graham Coates
Ms. Marysia Coates
Coates 1, Inc.
621 Bay Esplanade
Clearwater, Florida 33767
0
0
C ITY OF C LEARWATE R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL. SF-RVICFs BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TEL.rPHONI,. (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865
Re: FLD2005-07064 - 621 Bay Esplanade
Time Extension Development Order
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Coates:
On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time
frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case.
Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit to
construct the site improvements on your parcel at 621 Bay Esplanade shall be submitted by March 20, 2008,
with all required certificates of occupancy being obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the
building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a
building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to
reapply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or
licenses that require this prior development approval.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539
or via email at robert.tefft@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, AICP
Planning Director
S.•IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslBay Esplanade 621 EBB Tide (7) - Approved0ay Esplanade 621 -Time
Extension Development Order 02-21-07.doc
I'NANK I I11MAHI), MAYOR
JOHN DORAN, Cot NC:n.,MEMIJER I IOYf I IAIIIXON, CO NCIL.MEMBF],
BILI.JONSON, COUNCILA+EMBE:R ® CAI i.i:,\, A. PrnaseN, COt u:n.Mt>u;Ia;
"I"01 JAI, EMPLOYMENT AND MHRMA M: ACTION EMPLONTR"
0 Coates 1, Inc., 0
621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767.
Tel. (727) 441-4421
Mr. Michael Delk
Planning Director
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Florida 33758
Re: Community Development Board Request For Time Extension FLD 2005-07064 - Ebb tide
Mr. Delk
Please accept this as our request to be placed on the February Community Development Board Agenda to
request a 1-year extension to the above referenced development order. We understand that this is our second
extension request and, as such, must be approved by the Community Development Board at its next meeting.
The recent economic downturn coupled with rising construction costs have made it difficult to market our
proposed condominiums. Lenders are now demanding pre-sales in excess of 66% of the units to be built in
order to fund our project and we have not been able to meet the requirement with the current market conditions
which are, unfortunately, out of our control.
The recent road construction on Mandaly Avenue has also hampered our sales efforts, but we understand that
work will be completed soon.
We thank you for your assistance in this request and look forward to improving market conditions and getting
our project underway.
Sincerely
Marysia M. Coates.
Cc; Joe Burdette
Ed Hooper
0
C IT'Y OF C LEARW-A.T"E R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Posy Orrua: Box 4748, CLEARWATIT, Fl.omDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOU II MYRTH: Av Nt i--, Cu:ARWATIT, Rmif)A 33756
TELITHONI, (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT RI:vII?W
August 2, 2006
Mr. Graham Coates
Ms. Marysia Coates
Coates 1, Inc.
621 Bay Esplanade
Clearwater, Florida 33767
Re: FLD2005-07064 - 621 Bay Esplanade
Time Extension Development Order
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Coates:
On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above referenced Flexible
Development application to permit 13 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to height
from 35 feet to 53.25 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) with an additional 9 feet for
perimeter parapets (as measured from roof deck) and an additional 22 feet for architectural embellishments (as
measured from roof deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building), and a
reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code, and a
request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted
to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code)
under the provisions of Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code.
Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit must be
initiated within one year from the date of CDB approval (September 20, 2006). This same Section allows an
extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within
the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the
project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would
significantly affect the project.
On July 18, 2006, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to initiate a building permit to construct
the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited problems with construction pre-sales and financing, increased
construction costs necessitating architectural redesigns of the interior, and a change in architects.
Since the approval of this project, amendments have been made to the Community Development Code that have
a significant effect on the project. Those amendments are as follows:
o Section 6-109.B of the Community Development Code was amended to not allow the conversion of a
nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of
nonconforming overnight accommodation density to attached dwelling unit density;
FNANK I I11M \1;1), 1\1;\) "k
P,ii"? 1)cmn?, Cc,r, Cii. u. ncr:r. I1(WI I hN111:1 ()N, CUB NCIL>IE HPR
13n.i.Jux>u?, (:ni m.11.v oncrr ® ("A1,H::x A. PI:II aSr:x, GM NCILMEM F1,,
FM1'H )) \1F.\ I AND iii i:mm. i irit ACI [()N FMIT 1:1,"
August 2, 2006 0
Coates - Page 2 of 2
? The parking requirement for attached dwellings has been amended to two parking spaces per dwelling unit.
This project was approved with 20 parking spaces for 13 attached dwelling units, a rate of 1.53 parking
spaces per dwelling unit;
? The allowable parapet height for buildings with flat roofs has been amended to a maximum of 42-inches.
The project approved by the CDB included a parapet height of nine feet; and
? The definition of "Height, building or structure" has been amended so that only elevator equipment rooms
and like mechanical equipment enclosures are permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum
height within the district. As approved, the project included appurtenances (architectural embellishments)
not consistent with the above definition that projected 22 feet above the roof deck.
? The "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design special area plan has been revised such that it requires a
7.3-foot building stepback along either the north or south fagade of the building at a height of 35 feet. As
approved, the project does not incorporate a stepback at this height consistent with the District requirements.
In considering the above changes to the Code, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the
Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension of the original Development Order to
March 20, 2007, to initiate an application for a building permit to construct those improvements on your parcel
of land at 621 Bay Esplanade as previously approved by the Community Development Board with same
conditions of approval attached.
In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may
approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such an extension shall not
exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision
process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request
for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the
original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must
be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration
date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant
downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also
consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being
made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further
significantly affect the project.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or
licenses that require this prior development approval.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539
or via email at robert.tefft@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, AICP
Planning Director
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished Applications0ay Esplanade 621 -EBB Tide (T) - Approved0ay Esplanade 621 -Time
Extension Development Order 08-02-06.doc
Coates 1, Inc.,
621 Bay Esplanade,
Clearwater, FL 33767.
Tel: (727) 441-4421
Fax: (727)447-0849
Mr. Michael Delk,
Planning Director,
City of Clearwater,
100 South Myrtle Avenue,
Clearwater, Florida 33756.
July 13, 2006
Re: Ebb Tide - FLD2005-07064
Dear Mr. Delk,
Please accept this letter as our request for a 1-year extension for the above
referenced Development Order for the Ebb Tide on Clearwater Beach.
This request is based on the land development code section 4.04 and the
specific criteria for our request is as follows:
1. We are in the process of pre-sales and market conditions have been slow.
Construction lenders' have increased the number of pre-sales required to
fund construction loans and this has hampered us as well.
2. Increase in construction costs has forced us to redo some of our interior
architectural drawings in order to keep our costs in line while still
maintaining our commitment to a quality product.
3. We are also in the process of changing architects to a firm better suited
for the production drawings and this has cased substantial delay.
Should you require any additional information, please contact me and I will see
that you receive whatever information you may require.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
Yours Cordially,
Graham Coates -"?
Marysia Coates
Property Owners.
CC: Keith Zayac
D!MgMVE
JUL 1 B 2006
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
3
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 21, 2005
Mr. Keith E. Zayac
701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
r?
u
0
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576
Re: FLD2005-07064 - 621 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Zayac:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development
Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible
Development application to permit 13 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to height
from 35 feet to 53.25 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) with an additional 9 feet for
perimeter parapets (as measured from roof deck) and an additional 22 feet for architectural embellishments (as
measured from roof deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building), and a
reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., and a request for Termination of Status of
Nonconformity (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where
a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) under the provisions of Section 6-109.
The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law and
conditions of approval:
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
1. That the 0.37 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH)
Future Land Use Plan category;
2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of
the "Old Florida" District;
3. That the development proposal does not comply with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which
identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development;
4. That the development proposal complies with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which states
that densities within the District should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and that
building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code;
5. That the subject property is currently developed with 18 overnight accommodation units;
6. That the subject property is permitted a maximum of 11 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac);
7. That the adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with attached dwellings (duplexes
and triplexes) and overnight accommodations with heights varying between one and three stories, with the
surrounding area consisting of a mixture of attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and detached
dwellings;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYI' HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMA"I'IVE ACfION E\1PLOYER"
• . •
I
8. That the height of the proposed building is 53.3 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck;
9. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with subject property;
10. That the development proposal meets the requirements for, a termination of status of nonconformity as per
Section 6-109 to permit 13 dwelling units where 11 units would otherwise be allowed;
11. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria of Section 3-913.A; and
12. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria of
Section 2-803.C.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the existing water main within the Bay Esplanade right-of-way is upgraded to the satisfaction of the
Fire Department in order to ensure adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes, and that said upgrades
are depicted on a revised Grading, Drainage & Utilities Site Plan (sheet 4 of 5) prior to the issuance of a
Development Order;
2. That fire flow calculations are provided by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure adequate water
supply;
3. That any/all required Parks and Recreation fees are paid prior to the issuance of a building permit;
4. That any/all required Transportation Impact Fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy;
5. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks;
6. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or
as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff,
7. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. That
conduit for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed
along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's
representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric,
phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's
engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work;
8. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits;
9. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits;
10. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached
directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to
proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior
to the issuance of any permits which includes:
a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size;
and
b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials
and architectural style of the building;
11. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way;
12. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by September 20, 2006) of Community
Development Board approval;
13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit;
14. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water
meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as
applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
15. That the site plan is revised to depict the location of facilities to accommodate recyclables; and
16. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums
and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (by September 20, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained
• 0
within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not
change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a
period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one
additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building
permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or
pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by
this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require
this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-
502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision.
The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination
of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB
decision).
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539
or via e-mail at robert.tefft dr myclearwatencom.
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, CP
Planning Director
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 621 -EBB Tide (T) - 09-20-05 - RT - ApprovedlBay
Esplanade 621 Development Order.doc
RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS FOR 621 BAY ESPLANADE
General Engineering:
Is it necessary to tap the water main twice and open cut the street over the resulting width?
The tap has been revised to one wet tap and open cut as discussed.
2. Staff recommends use of existing sewer lateral to avoid open-cutting the street.
The existing sewer lateral has been extended as recommended.
Fire:
1. This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other
than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB.
Acknowledged
2. This building is to be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of
NFPA-13. Please acknowledge with intent of comply prior to CDB.
Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan.
1 Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to
the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge with
intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB.
Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan.
4. Fire Department Connections shall be indentified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire
Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of
Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2
feet in front of and to the sides of appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition.
Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB.
Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan.
5. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, tested
and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge intent to comply
PRIOR TO CDB.
Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan.
6. Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water
supply.Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB.
Per discussion at DRC, a MEP consultant will provide calculations prior to construction plan
approval.
T Provide Class I standpipe system perNFPA-1,13.2.2.2. Please acknowledge intent to comply
PRIOR TO CDB.
Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan.
Solid Waste:
Please provide recycling area for residents contact Tom Glenn 727-734-0920 for any
information.
A recycling area has been added inside the building and located on the architectural plans.
L ,r
Traffic Engineering:
Ensure that verical height clearance for parking garage is 8'2" to accommodate handicap van
per ADAAG.
The vertical height clearance for parking garage is minimum 812".
2. Strategically locate handicap parking stall near accessible entrance i.e. elevator.
The handicap parking has been relocated near the entrance.
Provide a stacking distance of 20-feet from face of proposed gate to back of sidewalk. How
will gate operate? Show location of controls, if any.
The gate has been relocated and dimensions to a minimum 20 feet away from sidewalk. The gate will
open by key pad and garage door opener which will be shown on the electrical plans::in the final
building plans.
Planning:
1. Relocate the handicap accessible parking space so that a safe accessible route is provided to the
elevator.
The handicapped parking has been relocated next to the entrance.
2. Clarify the nature/use of the areas at the east and northwest corners of the ground level of the
building.
A combination of dead space and storage.
3. Depict the locations of all light fixtures on the property and the heights of said fixtures.
There are no proposed free standing light fixtures. All lighting will be located on the building.
4. Clearly identify the proposed gates on the site plan.
The gate is clearly located on the site plan and dimensioned.
5. The drive aisle is dimensions at 24; however the gated access encroaches into the drive aisle
reducing the width to 20'. Revise the gated access so as not to reduce the drive aisle width below
24'.
The gate has been revised to provide a clear 24 feet width.
6. Dimension the distance from the proposed entry gates to the edge of pavement within the
right-of-way.
A dimension from the gate to the sidewalk has been added to the plan.
7. Provide details as to the architectural features of the building. A higher quality elevation drawing
will need to be provided prior to the application being heard by the CDB.
A higher quality elevation has been included in the site plan.
8. Provide a north elevation.
A north arrow has been added.
9. The site data table denotes a building height of 54'; however the architectural elevations
dimension a height of 564". Please clarify.
•
The height has been reduced to 53'-3" on both plans to top of roof slab. Please note that barrel the
roof "high hat mechanical cover" is designed to hide mechanical equipment and resemble a pitched
roof.
10. Provide revised floor plans that clearly depict the locations of doors, windows, balconies, etc.
Revised floor plans clearly depict doors...
11. How deep is the proposed swimming pool? Provide a building section drawing to clarify the
impact of the pool on the dwelling unit below.
The pool is 31-6" deep along with plumbing and other equipment which fits between the 10 ft high
stories.
12. The floorplan for "Level 2 Townhouse" is folded back onto itself and illegible. Please revise.
Revised
13. The "Level 6 Penthouse" floorplan (A2.04) depicts a trellis adjacent to the elevator. Is covered
access being provided to the penthouse?
The area with a trellis is a covered open air walkway.
1.4. What is the status of the dock? How is access proposed to be provided?
The dock and seawall reconstruction will be under a separate permit application.
15. Building height is to be measured to the mean roof, not the roof slab.
The height of the building has been measured to top of slab. As discussed in the DRC meeting the
barrel the high hat mechanical cover is designed to look like a pitched roof to hide the mechanical
equipment located on top of the roof.
16. The architectual elevations do not match the site plan with regard to the location of drive aisle
and pedestrian access. Please revise.
The plans have been redesigned.
17. How is mail delivery being handled?
We would anticipate that mail would be delivered to the office and placed in individual mail boxes by
the front desk employees.
18. Depict the locations of all proposed mechanical equipment and depict the means by which the
mechanical equipment is proposed to be screened.
As discussed in the DRC meeting the barrel tile high hat is designed to look like a pitched roof to hide
the mechanical equipment located on top of the roof. A roof plan showing the mechanical equipment
has been added.
19. Provide a roof plan.
A roof plan has been added to the architectural plans.
20. How is recycling proposed to be accommodated?
A space will be provided in the trash handling room for recycling.
21. The submitted Description of Request ("Attachment B") includes references to an increase in
height and for termination of non-conformity. However, no request has been made for the
reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. Submit a revised Description of
Requests which includes all requests associated with the development proposal.
Attachment B has been revised.
22. General Applicability Criteria #I requires that the proposed development be in harmony with the
scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties. The response provided in
Attachment "C" does not sufficiently address the criteria with regard to the above elements and
the adjacent properties as the referenced projects (Nepenthe, La Risa I and La Risa II) do not yet
exist.
Attachment C has been revised.
23. Provide a revised response to General Applicability Criterion 46, which addresses how the design
of the development proposal minimizes adverse visual impacts.
Attachment C has been revised.
24. Please note the following with regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion
#1:
(a) The provided response is inaccurate with regard to that which is requested. It states that only
an increase to height is requested, where the development proposal need also request a reduction
to the rear (east) setback; and
(b) It provides no information as to how the development proposal is impractical without the
requested deviation to height.
The attachment has been revised.
25. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #7, provide a rationale as
to how the proposed increase to height will enhance the community character of the immediate
vicinity and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Additional rational has been provided.
26. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #8, clarify how the
community character is benefitted by a building that will exceed 50 feet in height. Also, as the
development proposal requires a reduction to the rear (east) setback, provide justification that the
community character is benefitted by said reduction.
The attachment has been revised.
27. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #l0, the height stated in
the response (54') is inconsistent with the height denoted on the architectural elevations submitted
(561-4"). Additionally, Staff does not concur with the notion that a 564" building is consistent
with "mid-rise" development and therefore, Staff will not support the request for an increase to
building height as the development proposal is inconsistent with the "Old Florida" District of
Beach by Design.
The building height has been reduced to 53'-3" to be more consistent with mid-rise development.
Clearwater •
is Printed: 8/l/2005
Times are subject to change
DRAFT ACTION AGENDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Friday, August 5, 2005
8:30 a.m. STAFF REVIEW
9:00 am Case Number: FLD2005-07064 -- 621 BAY ESPLANADE
Owner(s): Coates I Inc
873 Island Way
Clearwater, Fl 33767
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Representative: Keith Zayac
701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404
Safety Harbor, F134695
TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com
Location: The 0.37 acre property is located along the east side of Bay Esplanade
Atlas Page: 258A
Zoning District: T, Tourist
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District, an increase
to height from 35 feet to 54 feet, and a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet as part of
a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under to provisions of Section 2-803.C., and a request for
Termination of Status of Nonconformity under the provisions of Section 6-109.
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, F133761
2544 Frisco Drive
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III
Attendees Included: Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Rick Albee, Robert Tefft
Applicant Representative: Keith Zayac
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
1 . 1. Is it necessary to tap the water main twice and open cut the street over the resulting width?
2. Staff recommends use of existing sewer lateral to avoid open-cutting the street.
The above to be resolved prior to CDB.
Prior to building permit:
LA right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the ROW of Gulfview Blvd. Contact
Engineering at (727) 562-4750 in Room 220 at the Municipal Services Building.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
No Issues
Fire:
Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 1
1 . ***PLEASE NO*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AO'HORITY HAVING
JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This
DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any consruction plans or documents other
than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB.
2. This property must be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of
NFPA-13. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB.
3 . Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, witha 4 foot clearance to
the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge
PRIOR TO CDB.
4. Fire Department Connections shall be indentified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire
Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of
Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2
feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004. Please
acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB.
5. Provide fire flow calculations by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply.
Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CCB.
6. Provide Class I standpipe system in accordance with NFPA- 1, 13.2.2.2.. Please acknowledge
intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB.
Harbor Master:
1 . No Issues
Legal:
1 . No Issues
Land Resources:
1 . No Issues.
Landscaping:
1 . No Issues
Parks and Recreation:
1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if
applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that
you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment.
Stormwater:
1 . No Issues
Solid Waste:
1 . Show where Recycling for complex will be located for residents
Traffic Engineering:
1 . Ensure that verical height clearance for parking garage is 8' 2" to accommodate handicap van
per ADAAG.
2. Strategically locate handicap parking stall near accessible entrance i.e. elevator.
3. Provide a stacking distance of 20-feet from face of proposed gate to back of sidewalk. How
will gate operate? Show location of controls, if any.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Planning:
Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 2
I . Relocate the hand accessible parking space so that a safe accessZl,!'e route is provided to the
elevator.
2. Clarify the nature/use of the areas at the east and northwest corners of the ground level of the
building.
3 . Depict the locations of all light fixtures on the property and the heights of said fixtures.
4. Clearly identify the proposed gates on the site plan.
5. The drive aisle is dimensions at 24% however the gated access encroaches into the drive aisle
reducing the width to 20'. Revise the gated access so as not to reduce the drive aisle width below
24'.
6. Dimension the distance from the proposed entry gates to the edge of pavement within the
right-of-way.
7. Provide details. as to the architectural features of the building. A higher quality elevation drawing
will need to be provided prior to the application being heard by the CDB.
8 . Provide a north elevation.
9. The site data table denotes a building height of 54% however the architectural elevations
dimension a height of 564". Please clarify.
10. Provide revised floor plans that clearly depict the locations of doors, windows, balconies, etc.
11 . How deep is the proposed swimming pool? Provide a building section drawing to clarify the
impact of the pool on the dwelling unit below.
12. The flootplan for "Level 2 Townhouse" is folded back onto itself and illegible. Please revise.
13. The "Level 6 Penthouse" floorplan (A2.04) depicts a trellis adjacent to the elevator. Is covered
access being provided to the penthouse?
14. What is the status of the dock? How is access proposed to be provided?
15. Building height is to be measured to the mean roof, not the roof slab.
16. The architectual elevations do not match the site plan with regard to the location of drive aisle
and pedestrian access. Please revise.
17. How is mail delivary being handled?
18. Depict the locations of all proposed mechanical equipment and depict the means by which the
mechanical equipment is proposed to be screened.
19. Provide a roof plan.
20. How is recycling proposed to be accommodated?
21 . The submitted Description of Request ("Attachment B") includes references to an increase in
height and for termination of non-conformity. However, no request has been made for the
reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. Submit a revised Description of
Requests which includes all requests associated with the development proposal.
22. General Applicability Criteria #1 requires that the proposed development be in harmony with the
scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties. The response provided in
Attachment "C" does not sufficiently address the criteria with regard to the above elements and
the adjacent properties as the referenced projects (Nepenthe, La Risa I and La Risa II) do not yet
exist.
23 . Provide a revised response to General Applicability Criterion #6, which addresses how the design
of the development proposal minimizes adverse visual impacts.
24. Please note the following with regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion
#1:
(a) The provided response is inaccurate with regard to that which is requested. It states that only
an increase to height is requested, where the development proposal need also request a reduction
to the rear (east) setback; and
(b) It provides no information as to how the development proposal is impractical without the
requested deviation to height.
25 . With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #7, provide a rationale as
to how the proposed increase to height will enhance the community character of the immediate
vicinity and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
26. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #8, clarify how the
community character is benefitted by a building that will exceed 50 feet in height. Also, as the
development proposal requires a reduction to the rear (east) setback, provide justification that the
community character is benefitted by said reduction.
Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 3
27. With regard to Co0rehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteriV0 410, the height stated in
the response (54') is inconsistent with the height denoted on the architectural elevations submitted
(564"). Additionally, Staff does not concur with the notion that a 564" building is consistent
with "mid-rise" development and therefore, Staff will not support the request for an increase to
building height as the development proposal is inconsistent with the "Old Florida" District of
Beach by Design.
28 . All conditions are to be addressed prior to the development proposal proceeding before the
Community Development Board (CDB).
Other:
No Comments
Notes: To be placed on the 09/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all
above departments' comments by Noon, 08/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate.
Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 4
* CITY OF CLEIRWATER
o' learwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W . MYCLEARWATER. C OM
July 13, 2005
Keith Zayac
701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404
Safety Harbor, F134695
RE: FLD2005-07064 -- 621 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Completeness
Dear Keith Zayac :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2005-07064. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Complete.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August
06, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown
Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one
week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your
representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have
regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the
meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4539 or
Robert.Tefft@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
Robert Tefft
Planner III
Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-07064 - 621 BAY ESPLANADE
•
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc.
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning
416-05 Client
701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
keith(a-keithzayac. corn
July 11, 2005
Mr. Robert Tefft ;
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE: FLO2005-07064-621 Bay Esplanade--Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Mr. Tefft:
1.) Pursuant to Section E of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill,
a storm water narrative must be submitted with all applications.
A Stormwater nanaSve has been added to the stormwater calculations.
2.) Pursuant to Section E of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive
Infill, a tree survey is required to be submitted.
Please refer to the Survey attached to the resubmAW package for all existing trees
contained on site. Also, on Sheet 2 of the Demolition Plan existing trees are called
out to be removed
3.) Pursuant to Section E of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive
Infill, building elevation drawings shall depict the colors and materials for all sides of
the building. .
The architectural package has been augmented with color labels and materials for
all sides of the building.
4.) Based on the size (0.37 acres) and the allowable density of the subject (30 du/ac),
the maximum number of units permissible on site is 11; however the development
proposal is for 13 units. Please clarify how the additional two (2) units are being
proposed.
Attachment B has been revised to include a termination request for 18 existing
overnight accommod Wons that converts to 13 multifamily units.
fZ,ayac, P.E., R.L.A.
Zayac & Associates, Inc.
D I?C?C?Od(? ....
I UL 11 2005
PLANNING B DEV : I SVCS
4*
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc.
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning
Ebb Tide Stormwater Narrative
go ORIGINAL
701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
keith@keithzayac.com.
The stormwater system is designed to treat the first 3/4" of runoff from the site through the
use of a normally dry treatment pond. After treatment the pond is designed to discharge
through the sea wall into Clearwater Bay.
D [[.U t? U U It
!
,;11 1 ?005
PUW w Dr. , 1 SVC"
4 iY CIIF C.1,t.???
40
40
ORIGINAI
ATTACHMENT B
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS
• Increase in height from 35 ft to 54 ft from FEMA to midpoint of roof.
• Termination of non-conformance for 18 existing overnight accommodations and
conversion to 13 multi-family condominiums.
p v I'1
J! is 9 2005
PLANNING 8 I
?tIY 4 G;:...... ,
• 0
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
July 6, 2005
Keith Zayac
701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404
Safety Harbor, F134695
CITY OF C LEARWAT E R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
RE: FLD2005-07064 -- 621 Bay Esplanade -- Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Keith Zayac :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case
number FLD2005-07064. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the
application is incomplete with the following comments:.
1. Pursuant to Section E of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, a
stormwater narrative must be submitted with all applications.
2. Pursuant to Section F of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, a tree
survey is required to be submitted.
3. Pursuant to Section I of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, building
elevation drawings shall depict the colors and materials for all sides of the building.
4. Based upon the size (0.37 acres) and the allowable density of the subject property (30 du/ac), the maximum
number of units permissible on site is 11; however the development proposal is for 13 units. Please clarify
how the additional two (2) units are being proposed.
Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete the
deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken
until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Noon, Monday,
July 11, 2005.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or at
robert.tefft@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
Robert G. Tefft
Planner III
BRIAN J. AUNGSf, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYI' I-IA:\IIUI'ON, COUNCIL?IEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILmrNlHER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEDIBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
0 •
Jul. 06 2005 02:24PM
YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept
YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 97939855 Jul.06 02:22PM 01'29 SND 02 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX 0435-7329).
0
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865
L.L
Clearwater
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
Date: July 6, 2005
To: Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc., (727-793-9855)
From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
Re: 621 Bay Esplanade / FLD2005-07064
Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2
Comments:
** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefftCAmvclearwater. com **
** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearwater.coin **
0
E
a aPLING
A Q
?a? DOI
GA ENI
A
0QQoi
pkz
? VERSENA
g MANGD
w0
?o
ACACIA Sr
PROJECT r ST m
SITE ° ?n
D PP?£
(?E L Y Y
Frf]LWOOD
O s
Fu
KENDALL
iD
O ?
BAY EEWP
P
g
N0441WAv P
AneNr
BAYMONT ST may(
sw a
?
g °a
gyro ?kT
g i
0
' PAPAYA j-ST
GI u7 p0f1'I PASS/GE O
t ?
8
a
O Sw
WINDWARD P
gR
FIRST er
a
O
Location Map
Owner. Coates 1, Inc. Case: FLD2005-07064
Site: 621 Bay Esplanade Property
Size(Acres): 0.37
PIN: 05/29/15/54756/078/0050
Atlas Page: 258A
SAPlanning Deportment\C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Bay Esplanade 621 - EBB Tide
(T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Bay Esplanade 621 - Location Map.doc
0
Owner: Coates 1, Inc. Case: FLD2005-07064
Site: I 621 Bay Esplanade I Property 0.37
Size(Acres):
PIN: 1 05/29/15/54756/078/0050 1
I Atlas Page: I 258A
SAI'lannincq Department\C D B\FLEX (FLDAPendinca cases\Up for the next CDB\Bay Esplanade 621 - EBB Tide
(T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Mops\Bay Esplanade 621 - Aerial Map.doc
• 0
f------, r- 654 ----- +
i__L I i , I6?_i ? `----i ,sue--•-?'
655 _?
?L?f'
I j ¢ I + j rn `O
1----
r ----- 1
+
6
-`
-----
ADE
644 NA - 1
v-
S--
64
k- t
r
F
a
I L840? i \ _
I
639
1 i `-
ROY
A j2
8?9 l 4 Epp f ?^
- -
I 632 , --, -I
/ `? I 11 -I i 11 1
81.8
? / ? i
t 1 I
I
r
1
i
'
'
62? t' i
,
f( ?? 1
+
16121 f
r
61?
617
1 m
0 i _eo846 C ko9 __ , 808, (p ; -- ' T
SA?
1 -_r Y
' 1
N - j 61?--1--`
` I V i
I
> 3 1 L-
_$06- 1
_+ j
605 1 m D i
?--- - 564 0
199
5^ m
i
3 --
5841
1
1 ._
-
.I
1
1 1 ?q--; -F
I
1 -?
579 1
-
saa 1 1 rl 79 '
tl 11
T1515 1 1
?
588
r
I ? I
I ,-- ? -- 561
531 0SA
----
_;
Zoning Map
Owner: Coates 1, Inc. Case: FLD2005-07064
Site: 621 Bay Esplanade Property 0.37
Size(Acres):
PIN: 05/29/15/54756/078/0050
Atlas Page: 258A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Bay Esplanade 621 - EBB Tide
(T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Bay Esplanade 621 - Zoning Map.doc
• 0
r , I I
I I
A ac
I?
I
I , r
1
-? w t_-_- l l I
--11 ----- 'r `I
--- I I I 644
---
j _r-r f 1 B6j1 l i
l
?
`-
rw,ht
hcc-\
?
A
%
C tions
639
ROYAL WAY 1 J
636 ; '1t?? 't\
Att
e(
-c 4
_
2
2
n w 1 mgs no
9J, ? o,l ! r
16121
1 614
y e '
city 617
m i 6018, r--
,
?.-. ! cnc_' r- t __r---, t
Park a I I , i ; _ ; 6frf"-l--
ht
erni g
'
'
-
-
n
-
,
3 -Ms
r-
coo modations
p ea m,
?q
(A 9
ih r -
JUANITA WAY
<
g__,
l
--581 z
?9 I ' `L 1 _ j --574 ,
?79 1, ; M Parkl g
I PlaceLY -_-
_r,
??g?. 571 Lot
?
Accbnp 4ti n
=
s
I
I
ssf
I -
531 :. in pd
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Owner. Coates 1, Inc. Case: FLD2005-07064
Site: 621 Bay Esplanade Property 0.37
Size(Acres):
PIN: 05/29/15/54756/078/0050
Atlas Page: 258A
S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Bay Esplanade 621 - EBB Tide
(T) - 09-20-05 - R7\Maps\Bay Esplanade 621 - Existing Uses Map. doc
0
Looking east along Bay Esplanade toward subject property.
-71
7-7
&-7
And
Looking east at subject property (left) and adjacent property
to the south (right).
to
Looking east along Bay Esplanade toward adjacent property to
the north.
°+
View of property to the west of subject property.
621 Bay Esplanade FLD2005-07064
View of property to the southwest of subject property.
'UpommunitY Response Te • f -F
Planning Dept. Cases - DRC
Case NoR- 137 -- U 1 Ck `i" Meeting Date: 1L
r
Location: (()?? I -U1 E- - -)) iC
tJ ? 11
? Current Use:7 (Ce
? Active Code Enforcement Case no, yes:
? Address number eg (no) (vacant land)
? Landscaping (e (no)
? Overgrown (yes) 60)
• Debris (yes) (9)
? Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes)
? Building(s) (good) fair (poor) (vacant land)
? Fencing (none) Q 0o (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
? Paint (good) & (poor) (garish)
? Grass Parking (yes) &
? Residential Parking Violations (yes) no)
? Signage (none) ok (not ok) (billboard)
? Parking (n/a) tri a (handicapped) (needs repaving)
? Dumpster (enclosed) not enclose
? Outdoor storage (yes) no
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
f .7
Date:CSReviewed by: I~IMV?Co Telephone: LC 170
Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03
f
0
PALM PLANTING DETAIL
M .S.
O .?z '??a??an.rruar rw cwy w.ac
PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION)
GRAPHIC SCALE
, ?<n Rio In
?
O Z
j
IRRIGATION NOTES Cd
en wowa.a
r.
n
? q F V
w np M
t ru c r <lw
oa m e e.
i ryes m:i.. r(T., ba« ao. p,...nuw, armnov< am". nv`ra o:' : <o°•.) ¢ a,
G]
? ?
e 3-rio3.e
? a
V
,o pm.a• roert < o,a „rar°a
?
^
o
? ?
'
?lery
wre
4eaM
b•m
h/wtwgvluuona, mwl 0• aut.m?rrW ww, M Emr p Len aM a<c.gon<a?a
r• ? ?
s nl ena Po + w«rr rw u,. E3
'"• nlm rmw ^9 Emn I. : i 9
Anr« - ,a- a«rw wrr. ee..
RF
TI. W,
PLANT LIST
rce, Ira w!. rn - arvrc) 5
pvobph,mka?im
r1r• m pmoapm.m TOan u. ,« proswrum,>cv.E.,t rR.l>o- oc.
ALMS TO BE REMOVED
5 OF 5
GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES
,. we ? rn. ?o<N. •n e . wpnr o we., o..row,«. ro p,n.p. pw,.e wane,. ene p•wnpr. nrL?,m
ll?
sNa
aw I
6 __
e.
ww
> .x w=erpro a
«<we<w. ,nn rna m,be a„ ,rn?a^ a a•a e....., A,we.ewn. www,ae p,pe«>.
•. na. P•e °i r.na:m .xn y,rwm io ,o s roa.e• « « me mon„r«w•e? apx r<m wa . <on)w. rw ..In
TZ, I wn y a
`"
u
`'
?
9:a e?
°oi m
d
oO
,
..L.n.w,• e.aw.
n
o
o
s .a .,tw-.a v w r n aen ,r.a L
e
e«
• ?`
l
tc.
a pon
w mw<n..nwn .a ,. w •ou,.a-? arte•n.rorarun
aw
aw ra<.... e
?a
3
!. the y?nr mo ana
0 1n
r tna Eonex p en+vwlw. r? Ne e.mt or o pncnPo
Lel rn. tpren e,.°a°M y"mi erw?y reu rtlw. anal p wa? ?
_ _
9. wy « wnanra. ru a«ncwr
Ih.
w w
n.<e•xry cpw?coere w,mna o e r.cene•a to wno•m
,0.
I r..u no r•a q ,?.. .. an • ?al .m<n r..u rn. unpucw wm?r«,
9
ri. n• tlon a<
one/e, apaexwLOn, anew b. d,wt.p to u. Eew <ww <.,,.<r
of (n) ,a -s °""""° r
a a
U
? ?
, . mra ea no o •rn+a •LOna w Llutma •rtnan N• .nrtan c Ora ln• o,n••
a«.`ot„, :° q i :?o ,::. a" w«a.r•<. m ., a. pwnr w,...e r w , pew a t.arr. n:l m„u.a ,,?„ rra Z
a
_ z o
,!. w :pn.'mm - u« q u teneuePo eonv«rw p w, ro ronexaw motemr „xtawLa.. Orxra««wa y
F?
,b. w Halo
a ,.c ae q tna y lac u „r prop. neuw co,wa aut q EweuoPo ?nl•«rw of m rodLwa ca
h a
4
? ?
rne mare q .vanes „nr.as o...... ap« dap .n rn• ap«rcou
,T. p. a .ace o•r a re a p•w ,-" g m
rb_ W conwaw rtlanldwarwn aT arwx ba Po u.« w r e w N<r. • ry e• t • w ,e ..rw..wta. aq ?
r9. EanL 9 we Noe ea r•mowe oa n«•awry e<caweat• n• Pq , va V
30. •ny • •oa trwr on daruNaa 9 • ranea<wa ?n•rabr?« awry w naNep •nn St 9 ar
1.1 lh.
I
N
re
L
e
% arar « aapaa.
33. .w ouoe
putweep
nln^n
p
d ?
I
HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL
F ELL
5' PUBLIC DO(
5'.10' DUMPSTER STAGING
(2) 20'.20 SIGHT M?
TRIANGLES
H.C. SIGN PER CITY INDEX
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE 6 THICK
3,000 PSI FIBERMESH CONCRETE
Wj F 6 / 10.10 WELDED WARE MESH
(2) H.C. RAMPS
11
4" WHITE TRAFFIC PAINT
//
I /
A i
S \1
\`\ TYPIC.
L
\
GARAGE FFE=6.50
? O \
1 - L
COLUMN LOCATION
(
GRAPHIC SCALE
I m<n ?iaT 1 n
TO CONSTRUCT
STRUCTURAL PLANS
\
i
\ P
/ CNCRETE A
\ ?
I/ TRUNCATED DOMES
\
v
12 CONPAGTEO SUBIFADE
\ TO 1. MAX OENSTY
STRIACHT CURB PER
CITY INDEX 0101 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL
PUBLIC SIDEWALK NT8
LEGEND
(iYP.) tYmCAL ?I
EXISTNC -E rc B, REI,-c
1-0 WNCIETE 1,11111.1.
GENERAL NOTES:
I. ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH ZAYAC k ASSOCIATES. NC.
'0 ENTERPRSE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404
SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695
(]2]) ]93 9888 Bua
(]2) ]9J 9855 Fa.
Z. SITE ADDRESS: 621 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER. R
PARCEL 10: 05/29/15/54]56/0)8/0050
ZONING: 'T'
3 PRESENT USE B GNERNGHT ACCOMMODATIONS
a. DEVELOPEp USE 13 MULTIFAMILY CONOCIM NUM UNITS
5. TOTAL S TE AREA 16,492.15 SF (0.3] AC)
6. SETDACKS: R[ou19EQ ppOpQ$[Q
10 5' FRONT 1500 (EAST TO BLDG.) MIN.
0 10' SIDE 1500 MN (NORM To BIDG.)
Is OO MN. (SOUTH TD BLOC.)
10-20' REAR 15.M MN. (EAST TO BLDG.)
]. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT Q
PROPOSED BLOC. HEIGHT 53'-3" FROM FEMA UNE TO ROOF TOP PARAPET
8. SOLO WASTE DUMPSTER WLL BE LOCATED IN BUILDING
9. UGFITING WARN PROJECT BWNDASBES WLL BE ATTACHED TO
BUILDING AND WLL BE SUBMITTED AS PMT OF FINAL BUILDING PLANS.
G0 EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS 5403.]] SF
II. ALL DISTURBED GRASS WTHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED.
12. ALL UNUSED OR WEWAYS MUST BE RENOVED AND REPLACED WTH CURB
SIDEWALK. AND LANOSCAPNG TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS
13. FLOOD ZONE'
MIS PROPERTY LIES WHIN FLOOD ZONE 'AE" AS DEPICTED
ON FEMA FLOW INSURANCE RATE MAP NO 1250960102G (ELEV 11)
DATED SEPTEMBER 3. 2003
I A COMPREHENSIK SIGN PACKAGE WILL BE SUBMITTED
4 UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION.
15. MERE ARE NO UTILITY EASEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY ME SURVEY ON
THIS PROPERTY.
16. THERE ARE 10 ENNROMENTALLY UNIOUE AREAS ON SITE.
i A $200 RECREATION FACILITY IMPACT FEE IS DUE FOR EACH NEW UNIT PRIOR TO
] ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS OR FINAL PLAT (IF APPUCABLE) WHICH EVER OCCURS FIRST.
CONTACT ART KADER AT ]2].562.4824.
18. DUMPSTER SER`ACE SHALL BE ARRANGED WM 50L10 WASTE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ME
ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL UCENSE OP CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
PLEASE CONTACT TOM CLENN AT ]2],562.4930
H, 2M uA.TA TABLE Ensn" PI?yO:E¢. RJ.TL6.R.EP.
A 0iµ SITE AREA: 16.49215 y (03] AC) Ifi, Z IS g (O3] AC) 00000 sF
B. TOTAL OPEN SPACE 000 V (0.00 AC) 6.666 .74 Y (0.15 AC) 82461 S (001 AC KIN.)
C. NIL DING FOOTPRINT s483.]] y (033 FAR) 8.85558 Y (053 FAR) -
E. SOEWALAMEGK/PAWED AREA. 11008.38 5T 969.83 SF
TOTAL MPEpNCUS AREA 16.492.15 3 11 W 6R) 9.8254 6F (059 17) 15.66]54 4 (0.91 ISTI MA
G PARKANG SPACES 10 SPACES 20 SPACES 20 (IS SRAMAIMT)
H. ANGULAR AREA N/A N/A
I. INTEldOR LAHDSCIPE AREA ./A N/A N/A
1 OWANIR T ACCGMMOOATKWS: 18 UNITS 0 UNITS N/A
M. -.-l GowDrWw .1 0 UNITS Q I} UNITS II.I In (3D UNITS/AO
r .R
1 -
i`
-z
F a
C, il
Om ?
Q
q
0
O
Q
r, a a
q ? F
C
Q
Cx]
U
3 OF 5
DATE 'M 11 05
E13B TIDE ?
RESIDENCES
CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA
0
•
Oda
f
>r
1M.?i?1O?ROA. SYD
loft e?a?awawr
IYRIw1Wwm A7h
610OPoemb MOVABOOY> INSION
b
I_
on "
r 5="t -r
mu?
1 1
1 r l o1-l11/
Gillett Associates
AAD'?G ROUP
Smu.2fi®?in.dee /
1543-101 R-J Sa !¦\
Sav.oe FJ d& 34236
9{1-957-4477
941-957-4151 Pa
QW Q?+
W ?
m
oA1i
• o.wgr >teoa
.M r.
a1?et ?
aas, a
air r....
A2.01
N
Q
ua
4
5U IUD ING AREA T45ULAT IO 6
SPACES UNITS ENCLOSED 5LDCx TERRACE
AREA (SF) GROSS
PAWING LEVEL 1 20 0 9420
TYPICAL LEVEL 2 4 8920 500
TYPICAL LEVEL 3 3 1030 500
TYPICAL LEVEL 4 3 6250 2620
TYPICAL LEVEL 5 2 4325 2634
TYPICAL LEVEL 6 1 4325 500
TOTAL 5UILDINC-c RESIDENTIAL UNITS : 13 UNITS
TOTAL ENCL05ED 5UILDING AREA: 40,210
TOTAL TERRACE AREA: 6,254
CONDO PARKING: 20 SPACES (INCLUDING 1 NC)
Gillett Associates
A RD ??OROU?P
A>chimcauc • Phnoiog
s.nm.2fiwi.imdm
1543701 S-d S-
Smwta, Fkad. 34736
941-957-4477
941-9574151 Fu
dd?uedtcm
KM
p
an
11>AI 1 11 M 101-011
W?
? U
U
¦
DA
? O1?}rM! >br
?osta5 r . 4s?'
sus mar
tea. a
air r>.?
A2.02
Gillett Associates
AHDT GHOUP
AcLmecnue • PL°°'°B
S.mm.m.mi.imdm
1543101 Sw..d S.
S.-., Al." 34236
941-9574477
941-957-4151 Fa
dd -
W?
W d
¦
M= MM
ftmM?
1" = 10'-0"
? .4m
.Hera r . wa'
A2.03
a
Gillett tlssociates
A GROUP
Aahimcmae.PLaamg
S-hr. i.Imdm
1541101 Second S.-
Saoeno,Fk i& 342M
941-957-4477
941-957-4151 Fat
ddtmm
W?
4q 0
V
W
¦
RjWR"
sm?
1 it . 104-041
10" * . W4r
.mo. !it
Yli •
A2.04
Gillett Associates
ARD ?rOROUP
Alchmecm¢'
soo>.Emml.lmdm
1543-1015mmd Snot
S.e.aa, P6dd. 342%
941-957-4477
941-957-4151 Fn
W?
H??o
F4 V
G4 ? ? t
W ?
RMR f inn
1"= 10'-0'1
,. WO M
n
• owe asr
a11a? r . i!'J'
somas puff
n s
raw
A2.05
Gillett Associates
ARDi OAOUP
i
154.1Ib1 S --d Sne i
Suu,t , Fkdd. 34246
941-9914477
941-9574151 Pa
dd?dccam
RMR PLAN
?mm:Y.C 16.F
mmmt
am 1" =10'-011
W?
G4 V
?4 g ? t
W
¦
M-
DATS
?ffim
A2.06
a
Gillett Associates
ARDT GROUP
Amy ?*-•Plmning
socn.lem.tmdm
1543101 S Rik N34236
941Ploeh 362%
Sm
v6? MS1
941-9szaul
Pn
W?
Hs?o
F-? ? ? w !
W?
17
RMR PLAN
Warw.
1" - 10'-0"
a?
• cwnr+ rws
ioeta? r . rra?
artw paulff
•sar sum.
Mr r?
A2.07
BLDG. MATFR7AT R LEGEND:
M
M.?
M.rgM?
ffi{AGgm M.?.
M.?Y10?.?1Nr
M•
M.
M•???1
M•??A.?14?.?
11225,
•0jr0m ?MM1?1
Bra
T
- ----ice=?
- _ - LE11a 1. T?"?
T--
+..
- _ ¦ f-0' ELEVATIONS
------ELV!.d
parrs
1" = 10 '-0"
Gillett Associates
ARDT UAOUP
Ar?rnsse • Ph..iog
1513-101 S.o..d,%-
34236
S
D
dd
--.,
o
.
941-9574471 -
9641-9574151 F-
dd?Eemdr?om
W?
U
W
0
a
w?
wa
• o4n+wt seas
r? t . rra
reacts
A3.01
SOM ELEVATION
BLDG. MATERIALS LEGEND:
r?.?rt E LI
M ?
MUM
a!AAGMM M..?.4?4 w.llwl?
A?? M•?Y'?i?
M.?YM?UMI
M.?Mf?.??1 N.r/MI?Iir
M.
e ® ® ® 0 8
- - ---3
0 ® ® ® 0 0
-
- LlVd 1 • T-O•?
NORT14 ELEVATION -- ---- ? • ?-??
M{ ??N4-
.
ELEVA4RM
-t r x r
eMr?
1 It = 10'-0"
Gillett Associates
ARDA?G ROUo
A.. -A...,....
sem.2?
1543101 S-d S..
34236
S.v.oy 95F-V
941-957151 P¢
ddti?
W?
V
m?p
g W
W
¦
oAa
• aww aen
wrE r . xo?
.? • Mm
A3.02
EAST ELEVATION ----
EBB TIDE
COLOR SAMPLES:
WALLS: CACHET CREAM #SW6365
TRIM: EGG WHITE #SW6364
•
SW 6365
Cachet Cream
53
SW 6364
Eggwhite
OF
PLAN'..__._?...,,.,.,_..
I.
AA
Lj,D5 !
0 0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Community Development Board
FROM: Robert G. Tefft
Planner III
RE: Request for Time Extension
FLD2005-07064 - 621 Bay Esplanade
DATE: January 25, 2007
Attached is information related to the request by Marysia M. and Graham Coates, on behalf of
Coates 1, Inc., for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 621 Bay
Esplanade. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on March 20, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for
good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause
"may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant
downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this
particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons
as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407,
the Planning Director has previously granted a six-month extension.
The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether
significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or
approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by
the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been
amended in the following that affect this project:
? Section 6-109.13 of the Community Development Code was amended to not allow the
conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this
project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation
density to attached dwelling unit density;
? The parking requirement for attached dwellings has been amended to two parking
spaces per dwelling unit. This project was approved with 20 parking spaces for 13
attached dwelling units, a rate of 1.53 parking spaces per dwelling unit;
? The allowable parapet height for buildings with flat roofs has been amended to a
maximum of 42-inches. The project approved by the CDB included a parapet height
of nine feet;
? The definition of "Height, building or structure" has been amended so that only
elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures are permitted to
project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height within the district. As
approved, the project included appurtenances (architectural embellishments) not
consistent with the above definition that projected 22 feet above the roof deck; and
? The "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design special area plan has been revised
such that it requires a 7.3-foot building stepback along either the north or south
Page 1 of 2
9
•
facade of the building at a height of 35 feet. As approved, the project does not
incorporate a stepback at this height consistent with the District requirements.
Attachments: Letter of Request, Time Extension Development Order (August 2, 2006), and Maps and Photos
S: (Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD)lInactive or Finished ApplicationslBay Esplanade 621 EBB Tide (T) - ApprovedWay
Esplanade 621 - Time Extension Memorandum 02-20-07.doc
Page 2 of 2
CDB Meeting Date: September 20, 2005
Case Number: FLD2005-07064
Agenda Item: F.6.
Owner / Applicant: Coates 1, Inc.
Agent: Keith E. Zayac
Address: 621 Bay Esplanade
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (18 existing
overnight accommodation units to be converted to 1.3 attached dwelling
units, where a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under
current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109; and (2) Flexible
Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings with an increase
to building height from 35 feet to 53.25 feet (to roof deck) with an
additional nine feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an
additional 22 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a
reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building),
and a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to
pavement), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.
EXISTING ZONING / Tourist (T) District.
LAND USE: Resort Facility High (RFH) Category.
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodations (18 units).
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (13 units).
ADJACENT ZONING / North: Tourist (T) District - Overnight accommodations.
LAND USE: South: Tourist (T) District - Overnight accommodations.
East: Preservation (P) District - Clearwater Harbor.
West: Tourist (T) District - Attached'dwellings.
CHARACTER OF THE The surrounding area is a mixture of attached dwellings and overnight
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: accommodation uses.
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.37-acre subject property is located along the east side of Bay Esplanade east of the northern
terminus of Cypress Avenue. The property has a zoning designation of Tourist (T) District with an
underlying Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) category of Resort Facilities High (RFH). The property is also
located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida"
District.
According to the City's records, the subject property is currently developed with 18 overnight
accommodation units. The subject property consists of a two-story building with an accessory swimming
pool and back out parking encroaching into the Bay Esplanade right-of-way. The immediate vicinity is
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005
Case FLD2005-07064 - 1 of 6
9 •
comprised of a mixture of overnight accommodations, attached dwellings (duplexes and triplexes) and
single-family dwellings, and the structures vary in height between one and three stories. Within the
immediate vicinity there are four approved condominium developments: La Risa I (650 Bay Esplanade)
at 69.5 feet in height, La Risa II (669 Bay Esplanade) at 52 feet in height, Nepenthe (665 Bay Esplanade)
at 59 feet in height, and Poinsettia Place (605 Poinsettia Avenue) at 37 feet in height.
Proposal:
The development proposal consists of five habitable floors over a level of parking (53.25 feet from base
flood elevation to roof deck), with a total of 13 dwelling units ranging in size from a two-bedroom 1,682
square foot single-level unit to a four-bedroom 4,220 square foot two-level unit. An elevator and two
stairwells will be located along the west facade of the building, providing access to the individual units.
The existing back out parking within the Bay Esplanade right-of-way will be removed and replaced with
sod and a five-foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the property line. It is noted that no sidewalk presently
exists adjacent to the subject property. The development proposal also includes the provision of a
swimming pool with sundeck at the south side of the buildings fourth floor. Parking and a solid waste
staging area will be located on the ground floor. No signage is proposed for the development at this time.
Building Setbacks: As noted above, the development proposal includes a request to reduce the front
(west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and to reduce the rear (east) setback from 20 feet
to 15 feet (to building). The reduction to the front (west) setback can be supported, as it is to allow for a
10-foot by 5-foot refuse staging area and a five-foot wide walkway connecting the stairway egress to the
public sidewalk. The reduction to the rear (east) setback can be supported, as it will allow a larger area
for development as the subject property becomes wider at the rear as compared to the front (west); thus
resulting in the ability to produce a better development product. Further, the development has
compensated for the rear (east) setback reduction by providing building setbacks in excess of the
minimum along the north and south sides of the property.
Termination of Status of Nonconformity:
The development proposal includes a request for termination of status of nonconformity to permit 13 of
the 18 existing dwelling units to remain where 11 attached dwelling units would otherwise be permitted.
As previously noted, the subject property has been developed with 18 overnight accommodation units.
The applicant desires to retain 13 existing dwelling units on the site. The termination of status of
nonconformity criteria as per Section 6-109, including compliance with perimeter buffer requirements,
the provision of required landscaping for off-street parking lots and bringing nonconforming signs,
lighting and accessory uses/structures into compliance with the Code will be met with this development
proposal. The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with those criteria:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202.D shall X
be installed.
2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards X
established in Section 3-1202.E.
3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or X
accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into
conformity with this development code.
4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be X
used to satisfy the requirements of this section.
Beach by Design: In 1997 and 1998, a Plan was prepared for the City entitled "Clearwater Beach:
Strategies for Revitalization. " This Plan was prepared after an extensive public process, directive
surveys and input from the City Council and City administration. The purpose of Beach by Design,
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005
Case FLD2005-07064 - 2 of 6
which was adopted by the City Council in 2001, is to implement the recommendations of that Plan and
regulate development within certain areas of the beach.
The subject property is located within the "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design special area
redevelopment plan and is defined as "an area of transition between resort uses in Central Beach to the
low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia (Street). " In order to implement this
vision, Beach by Design identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of
development within the "Old Florida" District. Further, Beach by Design states that densities within the
District should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and that building height
should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code. While "mid-rise" is
not specifically defined within the Community Development Code, based upon the height standards set
forth in the Medium Density Residential (MDR), Tourist (T), and High Density Residential (HDR)
Districts, the Planning Department has interpreted "mid-rise" development as having a maximum height
of 50 feet.
Development within the immediate vicinity of the subject property consists of attached dwellings, small
motels, and condominiums between one and three stories in height with building styles generally
resembling architecture from the 1950's. Based upon the above, the type of development proposed
(condominium) is inconsistent with the preferred development types in the "Old Florida" District.
The existing development has a density of 48.64 dwelling units per acre, whereas the proposed
development would have a density of 35.13 dwelling units per acre. This represents a decrease of
approximately 28% upon the existing density, which would be consistent with Beach by Design with
regard to limiting density to that of existing improvements. Further, the proposed height of the building
(53.3 feet to roof deck), while slightly in excess of the interpreted 50-foot "mid-rise" threshold, is
generally consistent with Beach by Design.
Based upon the above, despite the development proposals deviation from the preferred development type,
the project is found to be predominantly consistent with "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design.
Therefore the development proposal can be supported.
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria (Section 2-803.C): The following table depicts
the development proposals consistency with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria
pursuant to Section 2-803.C:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and X
development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting X
properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel X
proposed for development.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005
Case FLD2005-07064 - 3 of 6
Consistent Inconsistent
6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the X
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate X
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as
a whole,
8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street X
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist (T) District design X
guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3.
General Applicability Standards (Section 3-913.A): The following table depicts the development
proposals consistency with the General Applicability Standards pursuant to Section 3-913.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. X
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use
of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. X
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X
persons residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent X
Compliance with Standards and Criteria (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): The following table depicts
the development proposals consistency with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-801.1 and 2-
803.3:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Density 30 dwelling units per
acre (11 dwelling units) 13 dwelling units X*
Impervious
Surface Ratio 0.95 0.59 X
Lot Area 5,000 - 10,000 sq. ft. 16,492 square feet (0.37 acres) X
Lot Width 50 - 100 feet 101.85 feet X
Height 35 feet 53.3 feet (to roof deck) X*
Parking Spaces 1.5 spaces per unit
20 spaces) 20 spaces (1.5 spaces per unit) X
Front Setback 0-15 feet West: 15 feet (to building); and
0 feet (to pavement) X**
Side Setback 0-10 feet North: 15 feet (to building)
South: 15 feet (to building) X
Rear Setback 10-20 feet East: 15 feet (to building) X**
* See discussion with regard to Beach by Design above.
** See discussion with regard to Setbacks above.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005
Case FLD2005-07064 - 4 of 6
• •
Code Enforcement Analysis:
There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with this site.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials on
August 4, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development
application to permit 13 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to height from 35
feet to 53.25 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) with an additional 9 feet for
perimeter parapets (as measured from roof deck) and an additional 22 feet for architectural
embellishments (as measured from roof deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 15
feet (to building), and a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., and a
request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be
converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted
under current Code) under the provisions of Section 6-109, based upon the following recommended
findings of fact and recommended conclusions of law and with the following conditions of approval:
Recommended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
1. That the 0.37 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High
(RFH) Future Land Use Plan category;
2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as
part of the "Old Florida" District;
3. That the development proposal does not comply with the "Old Florida". District of Beach by Design,
which identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development;
4. That the development proposal complies with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which
states that densities within the District should be generally limited to the density of existing
improvements and that building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community
Development Code;
5. That the subject property is currently developed with 18 overnight accommodation units;
6. That the subject property is permitted a maximum of 11 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac);
7. That the adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with attached dwellings
(duplexes and triplexes) and overnight accommodations with heights varying between one and three
stories, with the surrounding area consisting of a mixture of attached dwellings, overnight
accommodations and detached dwellings;
8. That the height of the proposed building is 53.3 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof
deck;
9. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with subject property;
10. That the development proposal meets the requirements for a termination of status of nonconformity
as per Section 6-109 to permit 13 dwelling units where 11 units would otherwise be allowed;
11. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria of Section 3-
913.A; and
12. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria of
Section 2-803.C.
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
1. That the existing water main within the Bay Esplanade right-of-way is upgraded to the satisfaction of
the Fire Department in order to ensure adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes, and that said
upgrades are depicted on a revised Grading, Drainage & Utilities Site Plan (sheet 4 of 5) prior to the
issuance of a Development Order;
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005
Case FLD2005-07064 - 5 of 6
•
2. That fire flow calculations are provided by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure adequate
water supply;
3. That any/all required Parks and Recreation fees are paid prior to the issuance of a building permit;
4. That any/all required Transportation Impact Fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy;
5. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
6. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff,
7. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground.
That conduit for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall
be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected
utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to
be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the
commencement of work;
8. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits;
9. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits;
10. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or
attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with
regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and
approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes:
a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style
and size; and
b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors,
materials and architectural style of the building;
11. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way;
12. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by September 20, 2006) of Community
Development Board approval;
13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building
permit;
14. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical
and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are
attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
15. That the site plan is revised to depict the location of facilities to accommodate recyclables; and
16. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S: (Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 621 -EBB Tide (T) - 09-20-05 - R718ay
Esplanade 621 Staff Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005
Case FLD2005-07064 - 6 of 6
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
Please find attached letters of "No Obiection" from the immediate neighbors of
the proposed Ebb Tide Resort Project located at 621 Bay Esplanade on
Clearwater Beach that will be before you on September 20, 2005
?Ln
SEP 1 5 2005
PLANNING €, D'.VELOPMENT
FERVICES
-?LEARWATEA _4?
Rug 25 05 01:13P Joe Durdof 12 727-551-so51 P.
c
i
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Ebb Tide
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, please accept this as a
letter of "loo Objection" to this project.
Print Signature /4-ct-A J 2 r
Signature
Properly Address
Phone Nu?nnber "72 7- 7S
CC: Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater City Council
Hug 25 05 01:13p Joe B ette 727-581 6 061 p.2
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Ebb Fide
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, please accept this as a
letter of "No ®bjr on" to this project.
Print Signature
Signature
Property Address
3
Phone Nwnber//- V ,-(? -1 `-/
CC: Clearwater Planning Mpartment
Clearwater City Council
Aug 25 05 01:13p Joe 6urdettc 727-661-6061
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed 31
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, pIA
letter of "No Objection" to this project.
Print
Signature
Property Address
?2(07 OA--l GSft~#q Dc
Phone Number ?Z 7 - -4 Z 3 --'7J 6
CC: Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater City Council
Rue 25 05 01:13p Joe 3urdette 727-581-6061 p.2
• •
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Ebb Title
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, please accept this as a
letter of "No Objection" to this project.
Print Signature
Signature
!!! l
Phone Number ?We - J'2-2 .Z
CC: Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater City Council
Rug 25 05 01:13p Joe Burdette 727-561-8061 P.2
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater )Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Ebb Tide
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, please accept this as a
letter of "No Obpection9' to this project.
Print Sig
Signaturt
'Prop
Phone Number " v
CC: Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater City Council
Rug 28 05 01:13p Joe Burdette 727-581-8081 p.z
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Ebb Tide ?
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, please accept this as a
letter of "No Objection" to this project.
Print Signature
Signature ""?!?
Property Address c;7 17 -64
Phone Number 74 //.- 24Q9, 3
CC: Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater City Council
0
To: Clearwater Planning Department
•
ORIGINAL
Please find attached letters of "No Objection" from the immediate neighbors of
the proposed Ebb Tide Resort Project located at 621 Bay Esplanade on
Clearwater Beach that will be before you on September 20, 2005
SSA 14 2005
PLArv4, ? ??'
Aug 25 05 01:13p Joe Bur tte 727-581-80 1 p.2
ORIGINAL
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close Proximity Clearwater Beach please accept this as a
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade,
letter of "No Objection" to this project.
Print Signature
Signature ,?`l J I 1 'l ` ?' `-
Property Address r le
Phone Number _ ^/,12 - % `t/ - / Y 7.r
CC: Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater City Council
jh 33260
1 ,-
i
SEP 14 2005 ? j
t
PLANN"
Aug 25 05 01:13p Joe Burdette 727-581-8061 p.2
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Ebb Tide
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, please accept this as a
letter of "No Objection" to this project.
Print Signature leeee
Signature -- -- ?-.
Property Address
Phone Number( ?,L 7) G/ `'t l - / Y pfd
CC: Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater City Council
SEP 14 2003
PLArJ;
ORIGINAL
Rug 25 05 01:13p Joe Burdette 727-581-8061 p.2
9 9
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Ebb Tide
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, please accept this as a
letter of "No Objection" to this project.
Print
Signs
Property Address
(D(67 ?;-*V i?GR?F} ?c
Phone Number 7Z 7 -123 ---7 5
CC: Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater City Council
D
SEP 14 2005 + I
PLAN N' '3 S ,y J1
ORIGINAL
nus 25 05 01:13p Joe Burdette 727-581-8061 p.2
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Ebb Tide
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, please accept this as a
letter of "No Objection" to this project.
Print Signature
Signature
%l
??6//
Phone Number ??le
CC: Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater City Council
F?,
SEP 1 2o05 ?i
`c I
ORIGINAL
Aug 25 05 01:13p Joe Burdte 727-581-8016 p,2
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Ebb Tide
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, please accept this as a
letter of "No Objection" to this project.
Print Signature
Signature
Phone Number - v
CC: Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater City Council
i
SEP 1 2005
CITY OF 0
ORIGINAL
nug 25 05 01:13p Joe Bur Wte 727-581-8016 p.2
To: Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board
As a Clearwater Beach property owner in close proximity to the proposed Ebb Tide
Condominium project located at 621 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, please accept this as a
letter of "No Objection" to this project.
Print Signature +? LLi 11 ,664,e4-zc-VD6
Signature W,Zz
Property Address
61 ?'l 34 IJ --,,S164d14AE
Phone Number 9 2 -
CC: Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater City Council
D
PLAt.
ORIGINAL
0 0
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public
hearings on Tuesday, September 20, 2005, beginning at 10:00 a.m., in the City Council
Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the
following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the
meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property
owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the
beginning of the meeting.
1. (reconsidered from 07/19/05) The City of Clearwater is requesting reconsideration of the
attached sign approved through the Comprehensive Sign Program application contained within
the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application that approved
a problematic use for Amscot Financial in this location. [Proposed Use: Problematic Use
(Amscot)] at 1874 North Highland Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 32.08. Assigned Planner:
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-01004
2. Ardent International LLC., Panaviotis and Helen Vasiloudes (M3B Development LLC)
are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings with an increase
to building ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3.5 ft for perimeter parapets
(from roof deck) and reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft (to pool deck) and
from 20 ft to 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade &
50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lots 1 & 3 and part of Lot 2. Assigned
Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043
3. Raim & Xheziie Tzekas [A Very Important Pet (AVID) Salon] are requesting a Flexible
Development approval to allow pet grooming and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet
supply store and to permit a 6-ft tall fence located in front of the building (approximately 5 ft
back from the N Lincoln Ave frontage), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Pet Grooming/Outdoor Training Facility) at 1242
Cleveland St, Padgett's Estates Sub, Lot 3 and parts of Lots 2 & 4. Assigned Planner: John
Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-06058
4. Harborside Condo LLC (Mark Newkirk) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of
Nonconformity for density (16 existing attached dwelling units; 15 attached dwelling units
proposed, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the
provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 15 attached dwellings
with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 12.4 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 3
ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement),
reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.3 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 4.3 ft (to
sidewalk), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.8 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft
to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 87.25 ft (to roof deck) with an
additional 8.67 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B.
(Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 706 Baywav Blvd, Bel Crest Condo, Units 1-12 & 14-17.
Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07070
• !
5. K&P Clearwater Estate II LLC (Mark International LLC, Sunrise on the Beach Inc) are
requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight
accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13
dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible
Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width
from 100 ft to 90 ft along Coronado Dr and Hamden Dr, a reduction to the front (south) setback
from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6
ft (to sidewalk), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.5 ft (to midpoint of roof) and to allow
the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.13. (Proposed
Use: Attached dwellings) at 229 Coronado Dr, Columbia Sub Replat, parts of Lots 1 & 2.
Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07061
6. LOPA LLC (Patricia A. Bilotta & Lorri S. Ritter) are requesting a Flexible Development
approval to permit 3 attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to
23 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 14 ft (to building), a
reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to building) and a reduction to the
required number of parking spaces from 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit (5 spaces) to 1.33 spaces per
dwelling units (4 spaces), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.17, and
a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to zero ft, as part of a
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use:
Attached dwellings) at 1254 Grove St, Property of AJ Moore, Lots 14 & 15. Assigned Planner:
Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05042
7. Coates I. Inc. is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (18
existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a
maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of
Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings with an
increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 9 ft for perimeter
parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof
deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached
dwellings) at 621 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay unit No 5 Replat, Blk 78, Lots 5 & 6. Assigned
Planner: ?9beit_Tf?ft Planner IH. FLD2005-07064
8. Jerry & Teresa Tas are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density
(27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 20 attached dwelling units, where
a maximum of 10 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of
Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings within the
Tourist (T) District with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 83 ft (to roof deck) with an
additional 7 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 18 ft for architectural
embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 14.94 ft (to
building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 14.88 (to
building/pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement),
and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 67.5 ft along Coronado Dr and to 71.64
ft along Hamden Dr as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Sec 2-803.C.. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 342 Hamden Dr, Columbia
Sub No 2, Blk A, Lot 11 & part of Lot 10, and Columbia Sub No 3, Lot 7 & part of Lot 6.
Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07066
9. Hess Properties II LLC, and Bay Esplanade Properties LLC (Stephen T Hess) are
requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (15 existing overnight
•
accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 8
dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) at 64 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions
of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 21 attached dwellings within the
Tourist (T) District with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 51.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional
11 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 ft for architectural
embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 0 ft (to
pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec
2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 64 & 566 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5
Replat Blk 79, Lots 3, 18 & 19 (less R/W for Clearwater St), and part of Lot 2. Assigned
Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07065
10. Seawake Motel Ltd (Enchantment, LLC) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of
Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82
attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current
Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the
front (north) setback from 15 ft to 7 ft (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash
staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area),
reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 15.7 ft ( to sidewalk) and from 20 ft to 14 ft (to
cantilevered balconies), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 150 ft (to roof deck), a deviation
to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial
street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C;
and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of 3 dwelling units from 125
Brightwater Dr, 4 dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Dr and 1 dwelling unit from 321
Coronado Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 691 S
Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 16-19 & Rip Rts & land on S of Lot 19.
Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023
11. Clearwater Grande Dev LLC (Steve J Page) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of
Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68
attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code);
and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the
side (east) setback from 10 ft to 6.3 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from
10 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building),
from 20 ft to 17.6 ft (to open stairs) and from 20 ft to 8.8 ft (to pool deck), an increase to the
building ht from 35 ft to 99.5 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 ft for perimeter parapets
(from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a
deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct
access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 645-655 S Gulfview Blvd,
Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP,
Planner 111. FLD2005-07072
12. Canterbury Property Mgt Inc, TLS Holdings Inc, Dorothy C Boldog Tre, and
Canterbury Oaks Inc are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density
(127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units,
where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible
Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along
South Gulfview Blvd) setback from 15 ft to 5.45 ft (to building), from 15 ft to zero ft (to
decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to dumpster staging
area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth St.) setback from 15 ft to 3.63 ft (to building), a
reduction to the front (east along Coronado Dr) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a
•
reduction jo the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) and an increase to building ht
from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck)
and an additional 21 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached
dwellings) at 401, 411, & 421 S Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub Lots 72-77, 121-122,
124, 128-129 & parts of Lots 123 & 127. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner
III. FLD2005-07068
13. KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting
Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service
station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east)setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to
pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing
signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft
(to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft
to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30
spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow
vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display
of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and
reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement)
and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the
south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width
along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement),
a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential
use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation
landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior
landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive
Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off-
street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow
landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions
of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 and 1480 S Missouri
Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7-10. Assigned
Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039
14. Parkdale LLC (Belleair. Harbor, LLC, Maria Nikolova) are requesting Flexible
Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area
requirement from 10,000 sq ft to 8,171 sq ft, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement
from 100 ft to 60 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (south)
setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft
(to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out
into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Sec 2-803.C, and preliminary plat approval for 2 lots. [Proposed Use: Attached
dwellings (2 units)] at 475 East Shore Dr, Clearwater Beach Park 1" Add Replat Blk C, Lot 5 &
Sub Land. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner 111. FLD2005-06056
15. Homeless Emergency Proiect is requesting Flexible Development application to permit the
redevelopment and expansion of an existing residential shelter (including the expansion of the
kitchen and dining area), in the Commercial District, to maintain the existing front, side and rear
setbacks with the exception of a front (south) setback of 4 ft (to dumpster enclosure), and to
permit off site parking, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Sec 2-704.C and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G.
(Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 18 units) at 1200 Betty Ln, Fair Burn Add Blk C, Lots 7-
9. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07063
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or
objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file
written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the
hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with
respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings
and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per
Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall
be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates
that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence,
argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration
requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB.
An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public
hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and
spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB
shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the
Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be
available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL
33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about
the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
Michael Delk
Planning Director
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS
MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST.
Ad: 09/04/05
FLD2005-07064, (79)
108 5TH ST LLC
9 SUNSET BAY DR
BELLEAIR FL 33756 -
ARDENT INTERNATIONAL LTD LIABI
2840 EAST BAY DR # 363
LARGO FL 33771 - 2408
BAY ESPLANADE CONDO ASSN
584 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613
IN
4
LBRECHT, YVETTE
16 ASHENDEN WALK
FARNHAM COMMON BUCKS SL2
3UF 00009 -
UNITED KINGDOM
BANNON, MARY KATHLEEN TRUST
8013 WILDWOOD LN
DARIEN IL 60561 - 5914
BAY ESPLANADE
617 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617
ANDRESON,DEAN
ANDRESON,ANN
2046 BRENDLA RD
CLEARWATER FL 33755 -
BAY ESPLANADE AT CLEARWATER
BE
2110 DREW ST # 100
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231
BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC
627 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
BEACH & GULF SANDS INC BORUTA, SCOTT V BOYES, JAMES R
657 BAY ESPLANADE 611 POINSETTIA AVE # 101 BOYES, GEORGIA
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1515 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 969 BRUCE AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1013
CASWELL LLC CHAPEL BY SEA CLEARWATER BCH CHARBONEAU, RENEE A
949 BRUCE AVE 9342 HIDDEN WATER CIR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 54 BAY ESPLANADE RIVERVIEW FL 33569 - 3031
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1607
CIUCEVICH, JOSEPH
736 BRUCE AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1418
Clearwater Beach Association
Jay Keyes
100 Devon Drive
Clearwater, FL 33767
Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Doug Williams, President
2544 Frisco Drive
Clearwater, FL 33761
COATES I INC
873 ISLAND WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1826
D'ARRIGO, STEPHEN V
11 ARLENE AVE
WILMINGTON MA 02476 - 4131
DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC
90 MILVAN DR
TORONTO ON M91- 1Z6 00030 -
CANADA
CZIPRI, BRENDA K THE
334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338
PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427
DE BENEDITTIS, FRANK
DE BENEDITTIS, NANCY
4602 104TH ST
CORONA NY 11368 - 2813
DIGIACOMO, MICHAEL
DIGIACOMO, LESLIE
PO BOX 561
KIMBERTON PA 19442 -
DANNA, MARK A
584 BAY ESPLANADE # 3
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613
DEAN REAL ESTATE INV INC
647 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617
EYLER, CYNTHIA A
HOLDEN, DONNA L
554 ADALINE AVE
VANDALIA OH 45377 - 1802
EYLER, DONALD C FERGUSON, MELODIE A FIVE PALM CONDO ASSN INC
EYLER, CYNTHIA A PENNOCK, ROBERT M 673 BAY ESPLANADE
554 ADALINE AVE 665 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503
VANDALIA OH 45377 - 1802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1598
FLORENCE ENTERPRISES
603 INDIAN ROCKS RD
BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 2056
GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED
PO BOX 152206
IRVING TX 75015 - 2206
HOLDEN, ROBERT L
12 STILLWATER HEIGHTS DR
WEST BOYLSTON MA 01583 - 1122
KELLEY, PAUL
KELLEY, TRACEY
667 BAY ESPLANDE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1550
KRAMER, TERESA A
RADFORD, MAXWELL M
3614 S GARDENIA DR
TAMPA FL 33629 -
LOLOS, DINOS
LOLOS, DIMITRA
627 KINKAID
DES PLAINES IL 60016 - 5855
NATSIS, EVANGELOS
NATSIS, MARIA
622 POINSETTIA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
-0
FLORIDA POWER CORP
PO BOX 14042
ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 4042
H & HS BEACH PLACE
7105 PELICAN ISLAND DR
TAMPA FL 33634 - 7461
JAKSCH, ROBERT W
1596 SHIRLEY PL
LARGO FL 33770 - 2218
KEYS, RANDALL A
6713 E WHITEWAY DR
TAMPA FL 33617 - 3216
KROMER, JOHN
KROMER, JANET
10317 GREEN LINKS DR
TAMPA FL 33626 -
MAGILL, ROBERT P
584 BAY ESPLANADE # 2
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613
NEIL, MARIE-THERESE
4 RUE DE SAVOIE
PARIS 75006 00017 -
1638 FRANCE
OSTROWSKI, JOZEF
OSTROWSKI, RENATA
64 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1608
PARKS, DANA L
BARKES, MICHAEL G
11961 LOCUST LN
COLUMBUS IN 47201 -
P R M II INV CORP INC
584 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613
PORPOISE INN INC
609 CYPRUS AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1621
FRANKS, VIRGINIA B
669 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503
HESS, PAULINE D TRUST
HESS, STEPHEN T
819 HARBOR ISL
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
Keith Zayac
Keith Zayac and Associates
701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
KOZIK, CHRISTIAN A
KOZIK, ROBERT D
852 NARCISSUS AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1131
LA RISA DEVELOPMENT CO LLC
880 MANDALAY AVE # C-908
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
MICHAEL, BASKOVICH
MICHAEL, SANDRA
2866 QUAIL HOLLOW RD W
CLEARWATER FL 33761
NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH
DEVELOP
PO BOX 4189
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189
PARALITICCI, JESUS
611 POINSETTIA AVE # 103
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE
419 EASTSHORE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT RADAY, DAVID M RHOADS, JEFFREY L THE
ASSOCIATES YOUNG, SEAN PO BOX 861
12003 LILLIAN AVE 12003 LILLIAN AVE N DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0861
SEMINOLE FL 33772 - SEMINOLE FL 33778 - 3504
i
RUSULIS, ELAINE THE
31 ISLAND WAY # 602
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2206
SCHAPER, CHARLES F
580 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1609
SILLASEN, SEAJAYE
12313 W LOUISIANA AVE
LAKEWOOD CO 80228 -
STANLEY, BRYAN J
114 TURNER ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 -
TSETSE LLC
5210 WEBB RD
TAMPA FL 33615 - 4518
SNO-BIRD PROP INC
10 PRINCE ST
CUMBERLAND CTR ME 04021 - 4007
THURMOND, WILLIAM H
THURMOND, CAROL H
PO BOX 478
NEW ELLENTON SC 29809 - 0478
VASILOUDES, PANAYIOTIS
VASILOUDES, HELEN
767 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
WICKY, JERRY E WINCHESTER, GARY
WICKY, BETTY W WINCHESTER, PAMELA
PO BOX 1191 17111 HANNA RD
OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 1191 LUTZ FL 33549 - 5666
YEAROUT, JANE R
YEAROUT, JANET A
806 NARCISSUS
CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334
s
SEIFERT, MICHAEL E
SEIFERT, NANCY S
5825 PERSIMMON DR
MADISON WI 53711 - 5003
SOBOLESKI, JAMES W
191 DEVON DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
TSE TSE LLC
610 MANDALAY AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
WALLACE, A BARBARA
606 CYPRUS AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1620
YEAROUT, JAMES
806 NARCISSUS
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334
I
DEL MAR DEVELOPMENT LLC
CITY OF CLEARWATER
MADISON BAND
07/07/05
TO REORDER CHECKS PLEASE CALL PRINT E-2 AT 845.782.5832 OR VISIT US AT W W W:PRINTE2.COM
6142
600.00
600.00
'r
C a
ITYOFCLEAR ATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
LONG RANGE PLANNING TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 21, 2005
Mr. Keith E. Zayac
701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
Re: FLD2005-07064 - 621 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Zayac:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development
Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible
Development application to permit 13 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to height
from 35 feet to 53.25 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) with an additional 9 feet for
perimeter parapets (as measured from roof deck) and an additional 22 feet for architectural embellishments (as
measured from roof deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 15 feet (to building), and a
reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., and a request for Termination of Status of
Nonconformity (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where
a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) under the provisions of Section 6-109.
The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law and
conditions of approval:
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
1. That the 0.37 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH)
Future Land Use Plan category;
2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of
the "Old Florida" District;
3. That the development proposal does not comply with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which
identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development;
4. That the development proposal complies with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which states
that densities within the District should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and that
building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code;
5. That the subject property is currently developed with 18 overnight accommodation units;
6. That the subject property is permitted a maximum of 11 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac);
7. That the adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with attached dwellings (duplexes
and triplexes) and overnight accommodations with heights varying between one and three stories, with the
surrounding area consisting of a mixture of attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and detached
dwellings;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOPI' HAmll,10N, COUNCILMEAIBER
BII.I. JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PE'ITRSEN, COUNCILME:MBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYEV
1 r A
A
8. That the height of the proposed building is 53.3 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck;
9. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with subject property;
10. That the development proposal meets the requirements for a termination of status of nonconformity as per
Section 6-109 to permit 13 dwelling units where 11 units would otherwise be allowed;
11. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria of Section 3-913.A; and
12. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria of
Section 2-803.C.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the existing water main within the Bay Esplanade right-of-way is upgraded to the satisfaction of the
Fire Department in order to ensure adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes, and that said upgrades
are depicted on a revised Grading, Drainage & Utilities Site Plan (sheet 4 of 5) prior to the issuance of a
Development Order;
2. That fire flow calculations are provided by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure adequate water
supply;
3. That any/all required Parks and Recreation fees are paid prior to the issuance of a building permit;
4. That any/all required Transportation Impact Fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy;
5. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks;
6. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or
as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff,
7. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. That
conduit for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed
along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's
representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric,
phone, cable, etc.), *with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's
engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work;
8. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits;
9. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits;
10. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached
directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to
proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior
to the issuance of any permits which includes:
a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size;
and
b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials
and architectural style of the building;
11. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way;
12. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by September 20, 2006) of Community
Development Board approval;
13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit;
14. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water
meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as
applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
15. That the site plan is revised to depict the location of facilities to accommodate recyclables; and
16. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums
and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (by September 20, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained
within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not
change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a
period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one
additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building
permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or
pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by
this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require
this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-
502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision.
The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination
of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB
decision).
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539
or via e-mail at robert.teffta.mvclearwater.com.
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, CP
Planning Director
S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 621- EBB Tide (7) - 09-20-05 - RT- ApprovedlBay
Esplanade 621 Development Order.doc