FLD2005-01009
Clearwater
U *
C?
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $1,205.00
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 10-10-2003)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- use additional sheets as necessary
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Robert M. Pennock
MAILING ADDRESS: 665 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767
E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 727-441-1475
CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Melodie A. Ferguson Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD , • - . r -• : ??
(Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6)
Robert M Pennock 11 Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD `?... - . , '" -
AGENT NAME(S): Keith E. Zavac, PE., RLA MAR 10 2005
MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404, Safety Harbor, FL 34695
NL k, .'
E-MAIL ADDRESS: keith(a)_keithzayac.com PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 r1liv Q+
CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS of subject site:665 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached survey 0 t t I G I N A#
(if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) ?-,
PARCEL NUMBER: 0 5/2 9/1 5/54 7 56/07 7/0 060
PARCEL SIZE: 0.25 acres. 11,292.01 sf
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: 5 multi-family condominium units
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): see attachment A for requests
Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of
parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infilt Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable doc
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
' SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D.
1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located.
See attachment B for responses to items 1-6
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or'rpersons residing or working in the-' ighborhood of the proposed
use. ??
uV. -
2005
4. R -L 0
The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
P ' 1 1 A
6.. ?¢ t r ?• r t a i 1 L
The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
See attachment C for response to applicable flexibility criteria
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
Ah
Ah
2. NEW
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
A I
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
10.
uicrlj ejtRvision 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District desigQ
Use separate sheets as necessary. M ? 1 VV
. ,,-nAITiNAPOT
? Vv.
p?`?°, r- e-1 r=f*r'z\ mAi
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAMEQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.AT'
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
0
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
j, LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
1 PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (i.e. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to
the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
N GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) r-=-
?)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
_ All dimensions;
_ North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; MAR 0 2005
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; ^? ?p p?T
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Pi M"\'J? D"PrAl. -RI IL?'•tV l
_ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; s?
Include floor plates on multi-story buildings; CITY CF CLEo
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines; (' Note: Per Section 3-911, all utilities shall be located/relocated underground)
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
_ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; I , , t
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; r r I
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and ttt 1
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks
1A SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units; ORIGINAL
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses
? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Of'site elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
- Structural overhangs;
- Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
_ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
_ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey);
_ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed
landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
_ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 '/2 X 11), in color.
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21) Ate"
STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; MAR 1 0 L ryOQS
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
_ Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; r. ?
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations PLAf?? • V 120,00,g?n NT
IVa
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (S F M ) P?RIVIIT?SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable // ?J
? COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable lJ f (' P' A/ A
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive. Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project.
V BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials
t1 REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
! possible) as required
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs
shall include the street address (numerals)
? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
? Reduced signage proposal (8'/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C}
tom, ibclude ms- required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
Signature of property owner or representative L
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ;"
Sworn to and subscribed before me this i day of
1-tc• U C i? A. D. 20 ?S to me and/or by
, who is personally known has
produced -FLT P??7a ?. Z 7,3 `I7O-S 10 as
ident' i ation. _ F
?, Sq (EIS co
k? ?&-,
Notary public,
My commission expires:
EP?;-4 Notary Public State of Florida
Denise Taber
MCommission DD394857
Expires 02115/2009
ORiG4vgL
_1- 1
MAR J 0 2005
PY l?J,`,r 11 . XL -t
CITY OF CLV1QWAr R T
•
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
•
Melodie A Ferguson Revocable Liv"ing Trust Agreement DTD: Robert M. Pennock II Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD
(Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
665 Bay Esplanade
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
5-Unit Multi-family condominium development
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Keith F Z2y2 o G RI -6
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby. certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner
J
MAR , 0 2005
Prope y Owner
r A ? t
Property Owner -
..._.,wLs.?.?
C1 Y ® C
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINE:LLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of a State of Florida, on this day of
eo-c personally appeared 12,, -e-htg 0 C K 4 Me[od 62- who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. 1 ?Ir L"S. or)
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
{,%%Y AL,( Notary Public State of Florida
T Denise Taber
My Commission DD394857
o?n Expires 02/1512009
ORIGINAL
ATTACHMENT A
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS
• Reduction of minimum lot width from 100 feet to 27.82 feet at front setback.
• Reduce west side pavement setback from 10 feet to 6.33.
• Reduce east side pavement setback from 10 feet to 6.00 feet.
• Reduce rear pavement setback from 20 feet to 0 feet minimum and rear building
setback to 18 feet.
• Increase building height from 35 feet to 58'-8" feet (FEMA to roof midpoint).
MAR a1 0 2005
71NIT
CL-Y C? C ?, ....?
0RUNAL
ATTACHMENT B
GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES
1. The proposed development of * the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located
The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining
the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent properties. The proposed
project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach with the proposed
Mediterranean architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain
the small-scale multi-family character of the neighborhood. The project does not
deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed 5
condominium units. The character of the project is an upscale condominium
development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The project is in
character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the two previously
approved LaRisa I and LaRisa II projects
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and
proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of
other properties on Bay Esplanade, and set a positive example for the
redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when
appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and
will likely be enhanced by the development of the project.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The 5 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and is under the 7.5
?. units/ acre density allowed. There are no proposed uses other than residential that
will ha e a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the
MARL 0 2065ighborhood.
pU4.""4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion
The parking is designed within a fully enclosed parking garage that accesses one
24-foot wide driveway. There is no proposed on street parking associated with
the project. The proposed 9 parking spaces exceed the required 7.5 parking
spaces required by code.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of ' the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The surrounding parcels along Bay Esplanade are primarily multi-family
apartment developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with
no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance
the community character of the immediate vicinity by conforming with
Mediterranean flavor suggested by City code.
6 The design of ' the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts.
The project minimizes the acoustic and olfactory impacts of the project by
planting landscape buffers and the use of a parking garage with no exterior
parking. The project only contains 5 residential units, and will not include any
commercial or other businesses.
MAR 10 2005
cl l i r.i? Vt...? ..a... ..a
• •
ATTACHMENT C
RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE 1N1'ILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
CRITERIA
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development
is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and
development standards.
The applicant is requesting an increase in height from 30'-0" to 58'-8" feet,
reduction in minimum lot width and a reduction of the rear and side setbacks.
The property configuration is a pie shaped parcel with a front minimum width of
39.5 ft and an approximate rear width of 130 ft. The front building width is
designed to accommodate a 24 ft wide driveway, two 19 ft parking spaces and
associated stairs and trash room, which are fixed in dimension. The number of
parking spaces to accommodate the unit mix and city parking codes dictates the
building depth. The rear of the building includes a modest lap pool and
architectural pavers, which require a rear setback deviation. The remaining open
space, which exceeds code minimum, is heavily landscaped with minimal grass to
offset the requested setback deviations.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive
infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting
r -pr perties.
i
Bo the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will
MAR 10 2005 be enhanced. by the development of this project. The adjacent properties are older
apartments and multi-family structures. The construction of a new condominium
r building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting
properties, as well as increase the fair market value. The anticipated sale costs of
each unit are well in excess of $500,000, which will increase the property values
of the neighborhood.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are
otherwise permitted in the City of-Clearwater.
The proposed request for condominiums is consistent with both the existing
zoning and future land use of the subject property and adjoining parcels.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment
project are compatible with adjacent land: uses.
The proposed use of the property is consistent with adjacent land uses as multi-
family. The recently approved developments near this. project along with the
existing uses of the surrounding land uses are generally multi-family. The use is
consistent with the City tourist zoning designation and County Future Land Use
designation
•
5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses
within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise
available in the City of Clearwater.
The applicant of this project has lived on this property for some time and is the
owner of-the property. They are committed to develop their property to its best
and highest use that is compatible with recently approved developments in the
area. This. development is possible since the property is currently owned by the
developer and land costs due to other approved projects make the development
impractical in other areas.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive
infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
The immediate vicinity consists of older multi-family structures, several of which
will be torn down to construct recently approved projects. The development of
this project will upgrade the surrounding building appearances by using
Mediterranean themed architecture, as well as a fully landscaped: property with
palm trees and shrubs. The project also eliminates perpendicular parking from the
public road, which is still currently in use on the immediately adjacent properties.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project
creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
. ,proposed investment made in the property by removal of older buildings and
replacing with new construction will benefit the immediate area aesthetically,
MAQ t 1 j 2005 increase the property values of adjacent property, stimulate the redevelopment of
adjacent property, and provide a viable to increase the tax base of the City.
Cr,Y Ct ?,. ;?; .. -The aesthetic character of the community will also be enhanced by the
architecture of the building with fully landscaped grounds. The landscaping
includes a combination of palms, hedges and shrubs, which fully encompass the
property. The rear of the property will include a modest lap pool surrounded by
architectural pavers.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks and height increase are
requested for this project. The property has been owned for a long duration of
9 0
time by the applicant and is working with their existing property constraints to
create a project that fits the property and is consistent with other recently
approved projects within the area.
The existing immediate vicinity currently utilizes backout parking within the
right of way, which severely limits the capacity of the existing roadway. The
proposed project proposes to take the parking and move it all into a fully enclosed
parking garage under the living units. This will enhance the capacity of the
existing roadway and eliminate the visual degradation of the area by exterior
parking.
The requested setback flexibility is offset by the landscape package. The
landscaping in the existing vicinity is very limited and is severely stressed in
many cases. This property has proposed landscaping in all open space areas
except for the required sodded stormwater treatment ponds. The landscaping
includes taller palm trees, intermediate shrubs and lower groundcover that
surrounds the building and mitigates for the setback flexibility.
The building height is offset by the stepped fagade of the building along with the
enhanced Mediterranean theme. The current architecture of the vicinity is dated
without the City preferred Mediterranean theme.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-
street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development..
There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required
parking per standard code will be provided on-site.
MAR 10 2005
PLANN1! °'C DEPA ,PAENT
Ci zY OF CLa`-' t,% ZR
ORIGINA?
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown
District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable)
The "Old Florida" district is an area of transition between resorts and low
intensity. The mix of uses favor residential rather than retail. Densities in the
area should be generally limited to the density of existing buildings and should be
low to mid-rise. Lack of parking hinders revitalization of existing improvements
particularly on Bay Esplanade.
The proposed building consists of a low-density four unit multi-family project and
does not include any retail uses. The density of-the project is less than required
by the Tourist district and with only 4 units is below several of the existing
apartment developments in the surrounding area. The building being 58-`8"
above FEMA to midroof would generally be considered as a mid-rise building
consistent with other recently approved projects which have set a standard of
development. The project includes all required parking on-site and within the
building to revitalize the integrity and capacity of Bay Esplanade.
The architecture of the building is generally Mediterranean in nature, which is
consistent with the remainder of the tourist district with significant undulating
architectural features. The architecture is enhanced by the proposed palm trees,
which soften the corners of the building and provide a vegetative scale to the
structure. The colors of the building are consistent with the recently approved
projects. along the beach and do not include any wild or obtrusive colors.
?V
MAR .i 0 INS
., c7,q." WAr 1T
CIS OF GtE?•l2ud???R
ORIGINAL
•
PERMITS
401-04
Keith Zayac Associates Inc.
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning
Mr. Richard Alt, P.E.
Southwest Florida Water Management District
7601 Highway 301 North
Tampa, Florida 33637 - 6759
(813) 985 7481
Re: Penethe (Clearwater, Florida)
SWFWMD Exemption
KZA Project No. 401004
Dear Mr. Alt:
Please find enclosed three (3) sets of revised plans for the referenced project.
The following table summarizes the existing and proposed (revised) conditions:
EXISTING PROPOSED
CONDITIONS CONDITIONS
rvious Area
Total Imp e 8
731.85 71.7.58
6
t , ,
Vehicular Use Area (ftz) 3,970.94 866.28
Total Site Area ft" 11,292.01 11,292.01
for your assistance with this
m ere y,
:e t ayac & Associates, Inc.
Keith E. Zayac, P.E.,.RL,A
President
Cc: FILE
January 31, 2005
contact us if there are any questions.
MAR 1 0 2005
PLANNF,','v 0rPA rTMENT
CITY OF CLEAR W; -12R
ORIGINAL
701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
keith @kqithzayac.com
Calculations Using the Most Used Trip Generation Rates from the 7th Edition ITE Trip Generation Report
Description/ITE Code Units Expected Expected PM Peak PM In PM Out
Units Daily Trips Trips - Total ,t
Truck Terminal 030
Acres -4
C) C"
General Light Industrial 110 TSF Gross
Mini Warehouse 151 TSF Gross ? :a
Single Family Homes 210 DU
Apartments 220 DU 4.0 27 2 2 1 7t7
Mobile Home Park 240 DU
Assisted Living 254 DU p
All Suites Hotel 311
Rooms O
.
Motel 320 Rooms Z V N
Marina 420 Berths p
Health/Fitness Club 493 TSF Gross c.y1
Church 560 TSF Gross Z-1
Daycare Center 565 TSF Gross
?M
General Office 710 (Equation) TSF Gross c?
General Office 710 (Rate) TSF Gross
Medical Dental Office 720 TSF Gross
Building Materials/Lumber 812 TSF Gross
Hardware/Paint Store 816 TSF Gross
Nursery (Garden Center) 817 TSF Gross Not Available Not Available
Shopping Center 820 (Equation) TSF Gross Lunch Hour Traffic
Shopping Center 820 (Rate) TSF Gross
Quality Restaurant 931 TSF Gross Total In Out
High Turnover/Sit Down Rest. 932 TSF Gross 0 0 0
Fast Food w/o Drive Thru 933 TSF Gross 0 0 0
Fast Food with Drive Thru 934 TSF Gross 0 0 0
Drive Thru Only 935 TSF Gross Not Available »»»> No calculations but studies sho
Service Station 944 Fuel Position
Serv.Station w/ Conven.Mkt 945 Fuel Position
Tire Store 848 Service Bas Not Available
Supermarket 850 TSF Gross
Convenien. Mkt (Open 24 hrs 851 TSF Gross
Convenien. Mkt (Open 16 Hrs 852 TSF Gross Not Available
Convenien. Mkt w/ Gas Pumps 853 TSF Gross
Discount Club 861 TSF Gross
Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-thru 881 TSF Gross
Furniture Store 890 TSF Gross
Walk-In Bank 911 TSF Gross -+-?
Drive-In Bank 912 Drive-In Lanes
I:\PENNOCMDocuments\[tripcalc_16111 existing.xls]Calculations
31-Jan-05
27
J
1
C. - 1
L
w1unch Peak 146-364 two way trips
C
0"07Y_1a
Calculations Using the Most Used Trip Generation Rates from the 7th Edition ITE Trip Generation Report
Description/ITE Code Units Expected
Units Expected
Daily Trips PM Peak
Trips - Total PM In PM Out
Truck Terminal 030 Acres
General Light Industrial 110 TSF Gross
Mini Warehouse 151 TSF Gross
Single Family Homes 210 DU 5.0 48 5 3 2
Apartments 220 DU
Mobile Home Park 240 DU
Assisted Living 254 DU - -
All Suites Hotel 311 Rooms
Motel 320 Rooms
Marina 420 Berths
Health/Fitness Club 493 TSF Gross
Church 560 TSF Gross
Daycare Center 565 TSF Gross
General Office 710 (Equation) TSF Gross
General Office 710 (Rate) TSF Gross
Medical Dental Office 720 TSF Gross
Building Materials/Lumber 812 TSF Gross
Hardware/Paint Store 816 TSF Gross
Nursery (Garden Center) 817 TSF Gross Not Available Not Available
Shopping Center 820 (Equation) TSF Gross Lunch Hour Traffic
Shopping Center 820 (Rate) TSF Gross
Quality Restaurant 931 TSF Gross Total In Out
High Turnover/Sit Down Rest. 932 TSF Gross 0 0 0
Fast Food w/o Drive Thru 933 TSF Gross 0 0 0
Fast Food with Drive Thru 934 TSF Gross 0 0 0
Drive Thru Only 935 TSF Gross Not Available »»»> No calculations but studies sho
Service Station 944 Fuel Position
Serv.Station w/ Conven.Mkt 945 Fuel Position
Tire Store 848 Service Bas Not Available
Supermarket 850 TSF Gross
Convenien. Mkt (Open 24 hrs 851 TSF Gross
Convenien. Mkt (Open 16 Hrs 852 TSF Gross Not Available
Convenien. Mkt w/ Gas Pumps 853 TSF Gross
Discount Club 861 TSF Gross
Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-thru 881 TSF Gross
Furniture Store 890 TSF Gross
Walk-in Bank 911 TSF Gross
Drive-In Bank 912 Drive-In Lanes
.f' f-
r
-
r
ri7 t l ~-
0 L
i
•]
O
c
Cn L l
w1unch Peak 146-364 two way trips
•
•
48
I:\PENNOCK\Documents\[tripcalc_16111 proposed. xls]Calculations
31-Jan-05
T- ? e w. au(<..?
e,o ?••
-PLAIT SPACINL 011'i,IL (SFC'10•,)
rill
f?T ?.
PAI M I'I A'J TING CCTAII-
f /r \
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 I in lx io 111
?F N?RAI_ L.ANOSCAP Nt7TF_? z
e It,
s ^
. I e nu ac?y'.?
ft -,II I- I . ?'
ero ,gin as u< r . an em. j. h .
.,. ae-. ,. n,c. n
<o.,..•
_
I
<x,
ia ? .m ,r ra..<
„
l
w
?
w° 1 ? t? ?
..M... ,,
,.
<
o, .._n, <, nK c,•, a n.- f<.b,<.,
ca.l.,<fn a m. ?... '
'
<
m••
°
?
'
.
[
?
,.. 1 I
,•
M<, re , . e
.,
.,mi.
.<
..,n , . , e<
a..
n
t,.m<..c...cM,.c, O i? ° ei
:
a Z y t
.
I,,
,
f"?
r ?
i a
'
? ic
x <
.
.r .,,on mm <,•,.a ?I
+
,ax<,: e?i.,iio; e, .e .e<,a.: , s '+5 p
17.
'e ,o. <m
?
`
p
'
•
'
a
Q
W
,tl. ,a
mi oc,.-
<xM :o.w. ,F, ,nM o-
on
m.? e x ,M voi,<f. e
c„•f ,aMn
dqe<, .,w m v
,t•n .{ ? ? J
n, P .„.«e. 1 the k.e n-It-? ,r<
.. 9.?,,:a <. ? ??? ??;..?I;?? of I,., ?.,KI < <,M<f?.. •.mm., .b a.,? e w..? .., ? .?..,
:?..,?.?-1 \' ? ? ? IRRIGATION NOTE ? e e q q
1 ? t LpepY `} ? y-,? ?.?! / clrl.Q,. ?.n G• <,qnc e..e ma,am ty In. s+f.c<n
/ Y ?? •1. - - M1?W .- \ \ / / i .` ?. m°na Oeam<e'n' .cl c-..i <`.'? 1
Gt / B W m' , a5 3 J
?ltl
A -d 1-
A ?_ ? + ``? ? t , '? _ B ? ?F\\ . s e tv.e av .u ...• . n ,. ee.,, ": ,n. ?e m m, w.a ,..o'ro ,e, tm ? ,h
F^? /? ! . \ ???• `C f .? ... , w `: , /• s. uro?.< c. wm ,n c I e- m ,.a n.• ., n ,.o•m.<m<•.
?i r` Ilj ?- _'.. n ? ? re .. ?? _? ,mum l.•w<
p"y ? ? y ? i ? .`< ??- a T ? _ \ a'"...,?<cH4e,e xouna x< < w.- e i a i • ,jl
6? • ?i'? fl <? ? ? 11.1. m ? caty 'I. -?' \ 1
q
N [ }:,.r..[ o B /- < \ TQEE REMaviS
G ,l B r ..-? B w \ ? ) = PAC °
I`1'? ss' - *oTr.L FnLM mr:c F?e+ovAL
IV ? ? •/ ? v? ?'-.. '??x»?-3-- ? 'IIIII'? !I III ??•, _
ANT LISTB r
I f ?m INrxm/.a,e?i )uL.3d 0.4 RMe.l 4
BPA I'll'III /' rcu,+ilwt?cu,JV OC.RM.I 6
? s?•es ;o" •.v
9 OF 9
ICGI IF I1ATF? M !t1
B A Y
E S P LAN D -E
(2) N.C. P,?
TRUNCATEn DOME'
FOOT IND" #30A
r^
10'r:20 ' SIGHT
RI
NOTE ODIC
:
SIC!IG"
T
_-_SRJANCJ.4S_)
EnCED
GROM THE I
3' CURB iRAN9110N__?-r=
0 P.) 1
P.)
0
O_
e' CONC. SIOEWALI:0 V /
P-1YPICA(. GOLVNrV lC'•C.C.p02( O
°r
o??J N
i
V
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 rMI? ??v )IL
N
C=
cil
09
C.) 4
..._-_. ................. 1 h''•33' d.s. I CAMW, .'I ?IIIIII ??I
Rom
HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL 1^r„^?? 1 xss? ' 'I I I "?' ?-POOI DECK
. ,PA !I'il 1??
C `--1 N 8 09'00" W
.,..., r.,_. .,.. 48. '
10•.20 WATERFRONT NSIBILIIY
TRIANGLE (TYR) M A N D A L A Y C H A N N E L
.?:,..,. ."K NOTE' OBJECT Y1HR:
'AATERFRONT NSEIUTY r.. •r. Te.ar,r ..x1..1
6
LEGEND Y
_.._.._.._ , RoxcT enmm?ur •t
j 33
X v1 O+rE TO x x M0'2U V C
'-soPOSEr cevnEiE Pa„ CND \ N a?.
?' Fg
QI RAL NOTES: z ro
-.h
I. ENGiNEER/LPNCSCAPE ARCHITECT NC1i4 :ATAO k 00 . INC.
TOT ENTI,Ap.a E ROAD L I:ASTASt, SJI1F. -104
SAFETY HAP.dOR.17 FL 3+645 U ? . a
C ti
(72%) 191-9888 Uua
(722) 7.3-9855 Fov ?.b N
PH S,
2. SITE ADDRESS: 665 DAY ESPLANADE Q PH
} F
i
Ca
-
CLEAR WATER. FL
PARCEL TO: O5/2U/15/547550/0'.7/0060 (
O
'F BE
4 LI y C
ZL\N'NG: SIN
3. PRESENT USE APARTMENTS U
4_ DEVELOPED USE 5 CONDOMINIUM UNITS
5. TOTAL 'SITE AREA 11.2:12.01 SF (0.:5 AC)
6. sr TnnCRS: L+CDSEE-W e-M..O5EO
10-IC FRONT 21.62 MIN. (1011LDG.)
0-10 SIDE 6.00 MIN. (EAST TO SIDEWALK) 'J
10.00' MIN. ([A5I :0 DLOG.)
5.35 MIN. (WEST IO SNEWALK)
10.15 MIN. (1.EST 10 FSOC.) O
L
10-20' REAR 18.00 MW. ((O US.. L'
O.OG' MX. (TO POOL DECK)
T
-01 .0111: TOO
50.56 (AT FRONT SETBACK)
ALL.IAULE MA% .EIGHT
35-100 FT W
7
?;
E
F
PROPOS'C() BlDO. HEIGNI .8'-6' CROM FEMA LINE TU TOP OF FLAT ROOF ?
z a 10
8. SOLID WASTE WIaPSICn WILL BE LOCATED IN BUILDING <
9. LIGHTING YATHiN PROJ:Ct BOUNDARIES Will BE AlTACNEp TO
STOWING AND ALL BE ,UBMITTED AS PART OF FINAI. BUILDING PLANS. = J
10. ExISN4G vU-NC 1'001PRINF AREAS _ '.,-I, 5F = 0.05 AC.
E
. ALL DISTU EGO OR ASS -1-SIN FIGHT-CIF WAY 9VALL DE SODDED. X S
r? ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REFLACF.D "IN CURB
ETOEWAL AND LANDSCAPING TO UATCN EXISTNC CONDITIONS V
1
13. FLOOD 1.1 7 l
THIS PROPERTY LIES Y.ITXIN FLOOD -ONE AE- AS DENCIED
ON FCMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO 1^509601020 (ELEV 11) 3 Si ;
DATED SEF'[I1dEH 3 2003 i
11 A CORIFRFNENIYE SIGN PACKAGE WLL BE SUBMITTED
UXOER A SEPARATC PERMIT APPUCAnON t a
11. ALL SIT[ UCH1010 WILL BE ATTACHED TO BUILDING NO FREE. B
SI AND WS LCSIR.0 1S PROPOSED SR
16 THERE ARE NO UTILIIY CASEMENIS IDENTIFIED BY THE SUIT— ON _
THIS I ROPTRTI
1) IHEVF E \ INROMi NfALLY UNOJC AREAS ON JOE .I ,
o
\
L 1200 RECREATION ACL111 MPACT fFE S OUE FON E C C\ UNI6 RIM TO V l - •? T
ILI
?SUANCC O1 OJILDIO PEPIRTS I FW.L PLAT (_ APPLICABLE Yn C E'ER OCCURS `RR:T c
CNIPCi ART <ABER AT 717
562
482A
.
.
.
i 9. WISPS— SERttCE E4ALL BE ARRAN= AITN SOLID WA51L OEPARIA:EHT PFOR xO SHE
ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL OCENSE OR CERTIFICATE Or OCCUPANCY p
PLEASE CONTACT TCM REISS AT ]2561.1?30
_--„?eSSPDXQ;..._...., ,_.EEm?a . .
% (DIAL GIE 4REA: 11,292.01 6F (0.25 AC1 IL261.01 Y (025 AC) rO.WODO 9 8
8, i01AL OPEN SPACE: 2.500.10 Sr (DOE AC) 1,6'•x.13 SI (0.1Y. P1) 561.11 SC (0.01 Al NIX.) a
C OUILGNO FODIPRMI: 2,)28.1: EF (020 IS.) 5.DITs1 CF (0.4T 1.) - `y
E. SIDCwAN(/OCCK/PA%tD AREA: 6,405,1: 9 1.3;x6q] Y _
as
r, TOTAL NINIUNS PNEA: 6.131.05 SI' (Oll 1.) 6,111.56 SF (0.5l 17) 72:,10 4 (0.95151 OAX,) xnui aK
G PAM1T'INO 517ACE5: 10 "ACTS 9 6-ACES 1(1.5 _1511x0U
1 :tMGLLAR ARCH: 3
010
9" SF 666
21 i - -•.ry
,
.
.
r, uNCMOi LANDECARE AREA: 220.66 9 (555:) N,rA N/A 4H:Er
J. MULN FARILT UNIT:: ? -Is 5 UNNS >.5 0XIi5 (30 C'tY15/ACRE)
1
4 OF 9
I SSUE DATE: 01 .31 FIS
I
1, CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE E' THICK. 3000 PSI FIBERMESN CDNCP.ETE
Y+/ 5'x6`/10.:10 WELDED mRE 'AESH
- It 5110• ULTAFSTIR STACINC - `
,'Y-AREA
j l /r-3 CTRB 1RANSTION (TYP.)
I ,
I j STPIAIOM CURB (TYP.)
\1
AL \ D` CONC. PAVEMENT
it /?\ ?
0
•
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public
hearings on Tuesday, April 19, 2005, beginning at 1:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in
City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following
requests:
NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the
meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property
owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the
beginning of the meeting.
1. (cont. from 1/18/05) LBJ, LLC (BJE, Inc.) are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval
to permit a mixed use (proposed parking garage and attached dwellings in conjunction with
existing retail sales) with a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 4.77 ft (to building),
a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 2.91 ft (to building), reductions to the side
(south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), from 10 ft to 1.74 ft (to pavement)
and from 10 ft to 2.6 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 0.5 ft (to
building), to increase the building height from 35 ft to 70 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4 ft
for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and'an additional 16 ft for rooftop pavilion (from roof
deck) and to permit a building within the visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C., and a reduction to the width of
foundation landscaping along Poinsettia Avenue from 5 ft to 4.77 ft, as a Comprehensive
Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) Transfer of Development
Rights of 4 units from 656 Bayway Blvd, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. [Proposed Use:
Mixed use (4 level parking garage with 355 parking spaces and 28 attached dwelling units
[condominium] in conjunction with 37,940 sq ft of existing retail sales)] at 483 Mandalay Ave,
Clearwater Beach Park, 15i Add Replat, Blk A, Lots 2-7, & 15 ft Vac Alley on W & Lot 8.
FLD2004-09072/TDR2005-01015
2. (cont. from 3/22/05) Liberty Bank (Liberty Realty Group) are requesting Flexible
Development approval (1) to permit retail sales and service (bank) and offices in the Commercial
District with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 to 23.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction
to the front (east) setback from 25 ft 20 ft (to building), an increase to building height from 25 ft
to 28 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3.33 ft for parapet (from roof deck) and an additional
8.83 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to required parking from 38
to 35 spaces and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street (Gulf to Bay), as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; (2) to permit
non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with a reduction to front (east)
setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside of the
buffer fence along the west and south sides of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under
the provisions of 2-304.G. (Proposed Use: Bank and office space) at 1611 Gulf to Bay Blvd,
Longview Sub, Lots 3-4, 19-21. FLD2004-11080
3. (cont. from 3/22/05) Haddon House Inn, Inc. (Haddon House of Clearwater, LLC) are
requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings with reductions to
the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to building) and from 25 ft to 4.2 ft (to trash staging
area), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 8 ft from the Coastal Construction
Control Line (to pool deck), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5.9 ft (to
building), from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pool deck) and from 10 ft to 2 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the
0 0
side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3.2 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (east) setback from
10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), and an increase to height from 30 ft to 64 ft (to roof deck) with an
additional 4.16 ft for perimeter parapet (from roof deck) and an additional 15.83 ft for a rooftop
pavilion (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F; (2)
a reduction to the landscape buffer along Idlewild Street from 10 ft to 4.2 ft (to trash staging
area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 10 ft to 5.9 ft (to
building), from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pool deck) and from 10 ft to 2 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the
landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 ft to 3.2 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to
the landscape buffer along the eastern property line from 10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; (3) Transfer of
Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Sec
4-1403. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (14 condominiums)] at 12 Idlewild St, Clearwater
Beach Rev, Blk3, Lots 1, 13-15 & W 1/2 of Lot 12. FLD2004-10076
4. George C Clark Investments (Global Financial Investments, LLC / Equity Investments, LLC
/ KB Home - Tampa, LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval with reduction of the
front (east) setback along Lawson Rd from 25 ft to 18 ft (to building), from 25 ft to 14 ft (to
pavement), reductions to front (west) setback along Lawson Rd from 25 ft to 7 ft (to patios), from
25 ft to 11 ft to (building) and from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the front (south)
setback along Blackburn St from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), and a reduction to a landscape
buffer from 10 ft to 7 ft (to patios) along the east side of Lawson Rd, as a Residential Infill
Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-304.G. and Preliminary Plat approval for 248 lots, and as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: A
residential development of 248 attached dwellings) at 2520 Sunset Point Rd, Blackburn's Sub, Pt
of Lots 10-12 & Vac St. FLD2004-02011A/PLT2004-00007A
5. Bay Harbor, LLC (Baywatch Suites, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval to
construct a 1,376 sq ft multi-use dock facility to provide 8 slips as an amenity to 19 condominium
units. The request includes an increase of the width of the dock from 75 percent of the lot width
(135 ft) to 77 percent of the lot width (139 ft), and a reduction of the side (west) setbacks from
17.98 ft to 10.3 ft to the dock, per Sec 3-601.C.3. (Proposed Use: Construct a multi-use dock of
1,376 sq ft for 8 slips) at 600 Bayway Blvd, Bayside Sub No. 5, Blk A, Lots 6-8 & Riparian Rts.
FLD2005-01010
6. MSPA Acquisition H, LP is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for
density to allow the continuation of an existing 217-room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units are
permitted today) and for height to allow the existing 155-ft high building (where a maximum
height of 150 ft is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217-room/unit
overnight accommodation use with a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to
patio/pool decking and tiki bars) and to allow patio/pool decking seaward (westward) of the
Coastal Construction Control Line, an increase to building height from 35 ft to 155 ft (to existing
roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing), as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; (3) a
reduction to the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under
the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval, under the
provisions of Sec 3-1807 (SGN2005-01016). (Proposed Use: Retain existing 217-room
overnight accommodation use) at 430 South Gulfyiew Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub, Lots 33-
35 & Pt of Lot 36 & Subm Land on W. FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016
7. Sunspree Green, LLC is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density
for the existing 105-room hotel tower, located on 2.383 acres (density to be converted to 78
0 .0
dwelling units); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions
to the front (north along S. Gulfview Blvd.) from 15 ft to 11.88 ft (to security guard house) and
from 15 ft to 6.42 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Gulf Blvd.) from 15 ft to
zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 4.29 ft (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to boardwalk), an increase to building
height from 35 ft to 150 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11 - 21 ft for decorative mansard
architectural embellishments, an increase to fence height within the front setback from 6 ft to 7 ft
and a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; (3) Transfer of Development Rights
of 10 units from 41 Devon Dr and 3 units from the Sandpearl project located generally at 500
Mandalay Ave, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402 (TDR2005-01017); and (4) Preliminary Plat
for 1 lot (PLT2005-00002). [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (149 dwelling units)] at 715 S.
Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Shores, Blk D, Lots 1-2 & Accreted Land to S. FLD2005-
01016/TDR2005-01017/PLT2005-00002
8. Panaroma on Clearwater Beach, LLC is requesting (1) Termination of Status of
Nonconformity for density (15 overnight accommodation units, to be converted to 11 dwelling
units, plus 8 existing dwelling units), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible
Development approval to permit a total of 15 attached dwellings in the Medium High Density
Residential (MI-IDR) District and Tourist (T) District with a reduction in the T District from
10,000 sq ft to 4,350 sq ft, a reduction to lot width in the T District from 100 ft to 50 ft,
reductions to the front (north along Avalon St - MHDR District) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to
building) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the front (south along
Kendall St - T District) from 15 ft to 10 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (west - MHDR
District) from 10 ft to 7 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (west - T District) from 10 ft to 3 ft
(to building and pavement), a reduction to the rear (south - MHDR District) from 15 ft to 10 ft (to
building), an increase to building height in the MHDR District from 30 ft and in the T District
from 35 ft to 52.67 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 3.67 ft (from roof deck), as a
Residential Infill Project in the MHDR District and as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project in the T District, under the provisions of Secs 2-404.F and 2-803.C; and (3) Reduction to
the side (west) landscape buffer in the MHDR District from 10 ft to 7 ft (to building), as a
Comprehensive Landscape Plan, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use:
Attached dwellings (15 dwelling units)] at 15 - 27 Avalon St and 16 Kendall St, Clearwater
Beach Rev, Blk7, Lots 6-8, 14 & Pt of Lot 5. FLD2005-01007
M-W 9. Robert M Pennock, Melodie A Ferguson, Robert M Pennock H THE REM, & Melodie A
Ferguson THE REM are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 5 attached
dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 51 ft; an increase in
height from 35 ft to 59 ft to top of roof deck, an additional 3.5 ft to the top of mansard roof (from
roof deck) and an additional 11.75 ft for stair/elevator tower (from roof deck) and architectural
embellishment; a reduction in the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 3.5 ft to
pool and 18 ft to building as a Flexible Development project, under the provisions of Sec 2-
803.B. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (5 dwelling units)] at 665 Bav Esplanade, Mandalay
Unit No 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lot 6. FLD2005-01009
10. Clearwater Yacht Club, Inc. is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 3
story, 18,500 sq ft Yacht Club with offices, exercise room, restaurant and parking garage
structure, with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft to pavement and 4 ft to
building structure; to permit a building within the sight visibility triangles along Bayway Blvd, a
reduction of rear (north) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to paver deck and 18 ft to building and an
increase in building height from 25 ft to 46.5 ft to mean roof height, as a Comprehensive Infill
0 0
Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.E. (Proposed Use: Marina) at 830 Bayway Blvd,
Bayside Sub No 6 Unit A, Blk D, Lots 5-11 Incl. FLD2005-01008
11. Skiff Point of Clearwater, LLC is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 15
attached dwelling units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft to building
and from 25 ft to 3 ft to pavement; a reduction to the side (north and south) setbacks from 10 ft to
6.5 ft to building and 5 ft to parking; a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft to
pool deck, 5 ft to pool and 7.5 ft to parking; and an increase in height from 30 ft to 49 ft to roof
deck and additional 4 ft for parapet (from roof deck to top of parapet) and an additional 16 ft for
elevator overrun (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, in the Island Estates
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) / Medium High Density Residential
(MHDR) District under the provisions of Secs 2-404(F) and 2-1602(C). [Proposed Use:
Attached dwellings (15 dwelling units)] at 200 and 201 Skiff Point, Island Estates of Clearwater,
Unit 5-A, Lots 35-36. FLD2005-01012
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or
objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file
written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the
hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with
respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings
and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per
Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall
be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates
that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence,
argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration
requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB.
An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public
hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and
spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB
shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the
Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes.
5 days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be
available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL
33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about
the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
Cyndi Tarapani
Planning Director
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING
• •
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS
MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST.
Ad: 04/03/05
0 0
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.273-acre site is located on the south side of Bay
Esplanade, approximately 320 feet east of Mandalay Avenue. The site has 51 feet of frontage on
Bay Esplanade. The property is located along a turn on Bay Esplanade and is therefore a pie
shaped lot with a rear lot line of 120 feet along an existing seawall.
The parcel is zoned Tourist (T) District and is currently developed with four (4) attached dwelling
units. The site is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of
the "Old Florida District". The immediate vicinity is almost entirely composed of attached
dwellings (duplexes and triplexes) and a single family dwelling to the east. Structures in the area
vary in height between one and three stories. Within this section of Mandalay Avenue are two
approved condominium developments, La Risa I, located at 650 Bay Esplanade, is 69.5 feet in
height and La Risa II, located at 669 Bay Esplanade, is 52 feet in height.
Proposal: The proposed building will have five living floors (59 feet from BFE [base flood
elevation] to roof deck), with one unit per floor. All five living floors will include 3,700 square
feet of livable space and include two bedrooms and a master suite, three-and-a-half bathrooms, a
living room, a kitchen with a pantry and breakfast bar, a dining area, a media room, an office, and
a lobby area for access to and from an elevator. The second floor unit will have a balcony that is
slightly large than the typical balcony to cover the cabanas and pool equipment room. Elevators in
the northwest corner of the building will provide access to the units. Two stairwells are located on
the northwest and east side of the building.
Sidewalks will be constructed within the rights-of-way of Bay Esplande for pedestrian safety,
where no sidewalks presently exist. Amenities for the proposal include a swimming pool and
cabanas to the south of the building. Parking and a solid waste staging area will be located on the
ground floor. The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time.
Beach by Design regulates development within certain areas of the beach. Beach by Design calls
for renovation and revitalization of existing improvements with limited new construction where
renovation is not practical. The site is located within the "Old Florida District" of Beach by
Design where the preferred form of development includes low- to mid-rise new single-family
dwellings and townhomes. The Planning Department interprets mid-rise as maximum of 50 feet
based on the height standards in the Medium Density Residential (MDR), Tourist (T) and High
Density Residential (HDR) districts. The immediate vicinity is composed of attached dwellings,
small motels and condominiums. Building styles generally resemble architecture from the 1950's
and appear to have been progressively expanded. The proposed height (59 feet to roof deck; 71
feet overall from BFE) of the building and the form of development (condominium) are
inconsistent with the preferred development type and permitted height of the "Old Florida
District". The height is also inconsistent the majority of existing buildings in the area.
Staff has found instances within the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design where
developments approved by the Community Development Board, with Staff support, have and are
dramatically changing the character of the area. These changes have generally not been consistent
with the vision and requirements of the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design. Due to these
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005
Case FLD2005-01009 - Page 2 of 8
CDB Meeting Date: April 19, 2005
0
Case Numbers: FLD2005-01009
Agenda Item: E6
Owner: Melodie A. Ferguson & Robert M. Pennock Revocable Living Trust
Agreement DTD
Applicant: Robert M. Pennock
Representative: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA
Address: 665 Bay Esplanade
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwelling
units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 51
feet; an increase in height from 35 feet to 59 feet to top of roof deck,
an additional 3.5 feet to the top of mansard roof (from roof deck)
and an additional 11.75 feet for stair/elevator tower (from roof deck)
and architectural embellishment; a reduction in the rear (south)
setback from 20 feet to zero feet to pool deck, 3.5 feet to pool and 18
feet to building as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.
EXISTING ZONING/
LAND USE: Tourist (T) District/Resort Facility High (RFH) Category;
PROPERTY SIZE: 0.273 acres
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached dwellings (4 apartment units)
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (5 condominium units)
ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Tourist; Attached dwellings
LAND USES: East: Tourist; Attached dwellings and Single family residential
South: Preservation; Mandalay Channel (Intercoastal Waterway)
West: Tourist; Attached dwellings
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is a mixture of attached dwellings and
overnight accommodation uses.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005
Case FLD2005-01009 - Page 1 of 8
0 0
1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and
character of adjacent properties. The proposal includes a building with an overall height
of 71 feet (59 feet to roof deck from BFE). The proposed height is inconsistent with the
majority of the buildings in the neighborhood and is inconsistent with the "Old Florida"
District" of Beach by Design.
2. Development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. The
development is inconsistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity which
consists primarily of buildings less than 50 feet in height and the preferred type of
development in this area is single family dwellings and townhome units.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this
site.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-801 and 2-804.17):
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
DENSITY (30
dwelling units per 5 dwelling units X
acre; 8 dwelling units
IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE RATIO 0.77 X
0.95 max
LOT AREA (5,000 - 0.259 acres; 11,292 square feet X
10,000 s q. ft.
LOT WIDTH (50 - 51 Feet X*
100 feet
FRONT SETBACK North: 15 feet (to building); 0 feet
0-15 feet
to dump ster staging area); *
X
SIDE SETBACK East: 10 feet (to building) X
0-10 feet West: 10 feet to building)
REAR SETBACK South: 0 feet (to pool deck); 3.5
X*
10-20 feet feet to pool); 18 to pool deck)
HEIGHT (35 feet 59 feet above BFE (to roof deck);
max) 3.5 feet to perimeter parapets
(from roof deck); 10 feet to
rooftop pavilion (from roof deck); X*
12 feet for stair tower (from roof
deck)
71 feet overall height from BFE
PARKING SPACES
(1.5 spaces per unit; 8 9 spaces (1.80 spaces per unit) X
spaces)
* See discussion under Analysis.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005
Case FLD2005-01009 - Page 4 of 8
conditions, Staff has taken a more conservative approach to development within the Beach by
Design plan area, especially related to building height and type of use, and, therefore, cannot
support the height and the condominium use requested for this project. This proposal is
inconsistent with the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design with regard to height (59 feet to
roof deck and 71 feet overall from BFE) where low- to mid-rise buildings are required and type of
use (condominium where single-family or townhomes are required). As such, the proposal does
not meet the following comprehensive infill redevelopment project criteria:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise
economically impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards.
Staff agrees that the requested reduction in rear setback and minimum lot width is
warranted given the size and shape of the lot and historical development patterns in the
area. However, the applicant has not shown how the increase in height from 30 feet to 59
feet (to roof, 71 feet overall from BFE) is necessary for the development of the site.
2. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with
adjacent lands uses. The proposed overall building height of 71 feet from BFE is taller
than most surrounding buildings and is inconsistent with the requirements of the "Old
Florida District" of Beach by Design. The proposed condominium use is not compatible
with adjacent land uses.
3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill
redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development. The proposal continues the current trend of oversized buildings on small lots
further eroding the vision of the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design and will result
in a building out of scale with surrounding buildings.
4. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and
function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The design of the
building is out of scale with surrounding buildings most of which are one to three stories in
height, well below the proposed overall height of 71 feet.
5. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. While the reductions in
setback and lot width are warranted given the pie shape of the site and the existing
development pattern within the neighborhood, the proposed height is not consistent with
Beach by Design. The applicant has not clearly shown that an overall height of 71 feet
from BFE provides a benefit to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the
property.
Additionally, the proposal does not meet the following General Applicability (3-913.1 & 5)
criteria:
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005
Case FLD2005-01009 - Page 3 of 8
0 9
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS Section 3-913):
CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the
scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent X*
properties.
2. Development will not hinder or discourage
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or X
significantly impair the value thereof.
3. Development will not adversely affect the health or
safety of persons residing or working in the X
neighborhood.
4. Development is designed to minimize traffic X
congestion.
5. Development is consistent with the community X*
character of the immediate vicinity.
6. Design of the proposed development minimizes
adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory X
and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
* See discussion under Analysis.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on March
3, 2005. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development
application to permit five attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from
100 feet to 51 feet; an increase in height from 35 feet to 59 feet to top of roof deck, an additional
3.5 feet to the top of mansard roof (from roof deck) and an additional 11.75 feet for stair/elevator
tower (from roof deck) and architectural embellishment; a reduction in the rear (south) setback
from 20 feet to zero feet to pool deck, 3.5 feet to pool and 18 feet to building as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. based upon the following
recommended findings of fact and recommended conclusions of law:
Recommended Findings of Fact:
1. Subject property 0.259 acres property is Tourist (T) District/Resort Facilities High (RFH)
Future Land Use Plan classification;
2. Currently the site developed with five attached dwelling units;
3. Adjacent uses zoned Tourist District developed with single- and multi-family dwellings
generally between one and three stories in height, surrounding area a mixture of attached
dwellings and overnight accommodations;
4. The site is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the
"Old Florida District";
5. Beach by Design specifies a preferred form of development as low- to mid-rise new single-
family dwellings and townhomes, with mid-rise interpreted as maximum of 50 feet based on
the height standards in the Tourist (T) District;
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005
Case FLD2005-01009 - Page 6 of 8
0 0
COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA
Ni-etinn 2-90-1-C):
CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel
proposed for development is otherwise impractical X*
without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards
2. The development of the parcel proposed for
development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment X
project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill
redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the X
City of Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill
redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent X*
land uses.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for
development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment X*
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill
redevelopment project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the X*
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks,
height and off-street parking are justified by the
benefits to community character and the immediate X*
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the
City of Clearwater as a whole.
8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity
according to the shared parking formula in Division 14
of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking X
in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist
District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. X
* See discussion under Analysis.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005
Case FLD2005-01009 - Page 5 of 8
0 0
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
1. The proposal is not in compliance with the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design where
the preferred form of development is low- to mid-rise new single-family dwellings and
townhouses.
2. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive
Infill Project per Section 2-803.F.1, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
3. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.1 and 5.
4. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area and will not enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:IPlanning DepartmenAC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 665 (T) - 3.3.05 DRC - MTPIBay Esplanade 665
staff Report for 4-19-05.05 CDB.doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005
Case FLD2005-01009 - Page 8 of 8
0 0
6. The proposed structure height is 59 feet to roof deck; 71 feet overall from Base Flood,
Elevation (BFE) including height gained by the elevator shafts and architectural embellish-
ments;
7. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with these sites.
8. Staff finds the proposal does not meet the following General Applicability criteria:
a) Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and
character of adjacent properties. The proposal includes a building with an overall height
of 71 feet (59 feet to roof deck from BFE). The proposed height is inconsistent with the
majority of the buildings in the neighborhood and is inconsistent with the "Old Florida"
District" of Beach by Design.
b) Development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. The
development is inconsistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity which
consists primarily of buildings less than 50 feet in height and the preferred type of
development in this area is single family dwellings and townhome units.
9. Staff finds the proposal does not meet the following Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
criteria:
a) The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise
economically impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards.
Staff agrees that the requested reduction in rear setback and minimum lot width is
warranted given the size and shape of the lot and historical development patterns in the
area. However, the applicant has not shown how the increase in height from 30 feet to 59
feet (to roof; 71 feet overall from BFE) is necessary for the development of the site.
b) The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with
adjacent lands uses. The proposed overall building height of 71 feet from BFE is taller
than most surrounding buildings and is inconsistent with the requirements of the "Old
Florida District" of Beach by Design. The proposed condominium use is not compatible
with adjacent land uses.
c) The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill
redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development. The proposal continues the current trend of oversized buildings on small lots
further eroding the vision of the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design and will result
in a building out of scale with surrounding buildings.
d) The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and
function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The design of the
building is out of scale with surrounding buildings most of which are one to three stories in
height, well below the proposed overall height of 71 feet.
e) Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. While the reductions in
setback and lot width are warranted given the pie shape of the site and the existing
development pattern within the neighborhood, the proposed height is not consistent with
Beach by Design. The applicant has not clearly shown that an overall height of 71 feet
from BFE provides a benefit to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the
property.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 19, 2005
Case FLD2005-01009 - Page 7 of 8
Aerial Photograph
r wry r; ` Melodle A. Ferguson Trust and Robert M.
Pennock Trust
Craws, I FLb2005-01 X39
Site, :i . 665 Boy Esplanade
'rap/ 0.231
Saxe (Acres), I
PIN: 105/29/15/54756/ 77/0060
Atlas Page- 1 258A
0 0
LAUREL sr
KIPLING A
a
oQo Sao
GARDENIA ST 0
aoo ono
a
HfH/
VERBENA -
A
?
110 51
o
cN?a y o
0
0
PROJECT 0
SITE ACACW ST C
?
SOMERSET
Z
O bZZZ
0
IDLEWILD
D pP59P?'E
WALE .dF1R
ROYAL I
HEILWOOD
BAY
O
AVALON
k ?
KENODALL NE
O ? M
S
BAY ESPLANADE \yN PP
1-1 SE
O
\9\3'N
SW pMM
3-11
BAYMONT ST SKIFF p6\3\
SAY MA W W d m? S
O p 1
?y,
POINT
P
PAPAYA ST
k - DORY PASSAGE 0
° - _
y
Pier BOA 0
o Ca®w BIB 0
WINDWARD P SAGE
S,p
lb
FIRST
Location Map
Owner: Melodie A. Ferguson Trust and Robert M. ;Cases: FLD2005-01009
Pennock Trust
Site: 665 Bay Esplanade Property
Size(Acres): 0.231
i
i
PIN:
05/29/15/54756/077/0060
Atlas Page: 258A
01
--- - 3 a 11 I ,{ I I -? I
692
' ------? ' I ' I M r;
-
}72 665 ------ (/?
r--- I I--` _ l l I i ?I
I
I
I
-----
\
I I ,
,I
66p
661
T I 66, ,
-===6
8
6
657; i ,
l ; m ` -----J
I I
I _
' t
V
f--? I I
I X691?',-?
I I
L
_ _
'Lj
1=- _
--
_655
IL
I I
r I I I_ °J ____ I
I
I
_-
-------
I I
l 644 1 --- j
r
I {
661
I I ;
I I i ?-- I I
I IL-L401
? j \
639 638 ,
`- T
I , 64?\,
I
Y
63 1
I
S29
E
6
\
162?
' l
'4 16121
r
?
r-- -
I 61a D - 1
617
06 -, I 608, m -- 1
OSIR
W r , r 611
1
1
1 L
i
-
D 3
_ r--tm
D rliT 1
- I
-?
-
°ll
-
1 _
D
' 11
?
-soa m 1-
605
I
- ---1 X65- m Y99
1 '
58
8
I 5
$7,9. --1 --_-- 4
Zoning Map
Melodie A. Ferguson Trust and Robert M.
Owner: Cases: FLD2005-01009
Pennock Trust
i
Site:
665 Bay Esplanade
Property
0.231
Size(Acres):
PIN: 05/29/15/54756/077/0060
Atlas Page:
258A
T
0 0
II 67 _ -'I r _ . I - I - I A-
SOMERSETST
ao
-, -
-L ----- J-11
I sss ??-----' i
m
--
r 665 ------ 1
-' -- --
I
L 1 ?? '--? i I II
-----
\ ,
6s0
r I ??
- Ove I -J -- I Z
' _
--
_I --_ =gbg 661,
ACC 'mmo'ltio
657
--- 1 ?A ?nrtsdit ons
------I ---1*4 65?_ r-- r- -- 4 \ -----?,,
I V
I I
!
_
655 ?;`-_ , -----660 A ta --?frSA ; A Wed
r- --, -- r
r I I I_ e n i---- '
I I
D
' -_I' ----- --- I I I 6441
BsJI I I
a `--?
I IV w i
D Tiff,
--- , '? Ov n lit I -
I
I I ?
4o
L ---
I
?
639 I f
atiiafis
?m
I-?
J
J
ROYAL WAY
I ssi ~--I s s "N
--- t
m
tions
99Acc
---
$
-
-
\ ` /
; it
1 I I II 4
6.12
I }?(
I lam- -- I ? 6 .?? \
62
I\
W
Q taC d 16121
,
`
I 61? D
I
--
W
l -
617
y
r
m
2 I 60 1 ?6 .? -- I 6061 r- ,
j C
N', --- 611 I---
1'
I
a L I j l
_
`_
_`,
D 3
- D ?T
-
?
'
-
-soa m 1-? ,
i D 'I
soy
?I s??--- -- v
5 SS4 1 `,
---I ? '--1
m g9
-- -
1
I
JUANITA WAY ' - - '-
-
I 579-
--_-- 4
Existing Surrounding Uses
Melodie A. Ferguson Trust and Robert M.
Owner: Cases: FLD2005-01009
Trust
Pennock
Site: 665 Bay Esplanade Property 0.231
Size (Acres):
PIN: 05/29/15/54756/077/0060
Atlas Page: 258A
0
y j`•
F
sh-r 'l
:?f{Fy{ 1 4..10 4 ? ?L?
-- - „?„
i ldt"? 'v? llf!{!l!!lIP ? n= MIS? "Ill
- -
FLD2005-01009 Robert Pennock
665 Bay Esplanade
•
CITY OF CLEA WATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576
February 25, 2005
ZAYAC, KEITH
701 ENTERPRISE RD EAST STE 404
SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695
RE: FLD2005-01009 LOCATED AT 665 BAY ESPLANADE - NEPENTHE CONDOMINIUM
Dear KEITH ZAYAC:
The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee
(PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLD2005-01009. These comments are generated
early to give you assistance in preparing for the upcoming DRC Meeting on March 3, 2005. Please
be prepared to address these comments and any others that may be generated at the DRC meeting.
If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582.
Sincerely,
., _ -
."t,L4 A- Marc Mariano
Consultant Planner
Cc: File
_ I ro d"fl,
Conditions Associated Wi#
FLD2005-01009
`w 665 BAY ESPLANADE
Engineering CtS coition Initials Missing Initials Missing
02/17/2005 1) New sanitary lateral shall meet requirements of Engineering Index #305 and shall be
constructed at applicant's expense.
The above to be addressed prior to CDB.
The following to be addressed prior to building permit:
1) Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe shall be
installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe
shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device.
2) Separate right-of-way permits shall be obtained prior to open cutting the road for sewer and
reclaimed water lines. Contact Don Melone (727.562.4798) for permit information.
3) A separate right-of-way permit shall be obtained prior to making connection to the city water
main.
4) Concrete driveway portion located in right-of-way shall be 6" thick, 3,000 psi fibermesh
concrete with 6"x 6"/10x10 welded wire mesh.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may
be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental Condition
Heather Faessler
562-4897
562-4327 xt 3025
Not Met
02/17/2005 No Issues.
Fire Condition
Ann Downes-Blackburn
02/16/2005 This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents
other than site work.
02/16/2005 Show freestanding FDC at least 15 feet away from the building and within 40 feet of the Fire
Hydrant dedicated to the Fire Sprinkler System.. PRIOR TO CDB.
Irrigation Condition
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
02/10/2005 Irrigation must meet the City Code per Section 3-1203.C., provide plans to show 100% coverage,
rain sensor, automatic timer, etc.
Landscape
Arden Dittmer
02/10/2005 Revise the landscape plans to indicate ALL proposed utility lines.
Land Resource Condition Rick Albee
02/25/2005 No Issues.
Parks & Recs Condition
Not Met
562-4604
562-4741
Not Met
Not Met
A $200 Recreation Facility impact fee is due for each new unit prior to issuance of building permits Not Met
or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824.
Storm Water Condition Brian Barker 562-4779
02/16/2005 1. Identify the function of the "unknown yard drain" that is shown on the survey. Not Met
2. Provide additional grades and cross sections in the 10' side setback.
All of the above to be addressed prior to any building permits.
Solid Waste Service
That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an Not Met
occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930
Print Date: 02/25/2005
CaseConditons
Page 1 of 2
FLD2005-01009
665 BAY ESPLANADE
Solid Waste Service
Please show on plans
0
That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an Not Met
occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930
Traffic Eng Condition
Bennett Elbo
562-4775
02/11/2005 1. Include City standard disabled parking space and sign details. Please use the link below for the Not Met
details. http://wviw.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index.asp
2. Provide handicap access path to elevator which does not encroach into the 24 ft. drive aisle.
3. Provide an accessible route from public sidewalk to an accessible entrance. (Florida
Accessibility Code For Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11.4.3.2)
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
General note: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
Zoning Condition Arden Dittmer 562-4604
The application application appears complete however, Staff cannot recommend approval based Not Met
on the fact that the height (approximaltey 70 feet) exceeds that specified within Beach by Design
(mid-rise which has been determined by the Planning Department to be 50 feet. In addition, the
form of development is contrary to that specified within Beach by Design. The preferred form of
development includes single-family dwelling and townhouses. The submitted form of
development are five condominium units. The Planning Department will recommend DENIAL of
the application in its current form;
A zoning comments to be addressed prior to CDB review; Not Met
The wrong application was submitted - the case is actually a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Not Met
Project because the rear setback proposed is zero feet to pool deck; The correct application with
the applicable CIRP criteria will need to be submitted prior to CDB review;
It is not clear how the proposed development is compatible with the existing character of the Not Met
surrounding neighborhood. The height appears too large in comparrison with surrounding
properties. The maximum supportable height is 50 feet;
Label the unidentified room at the northeast corner of the ground floor;
Not Met
The west elevation appears very plain and might be improved with additional architectural features Not Met
such as banding, trim, etc.. The other remain elevations seem to be somewhat preliminary as
well and could use additional architectural embellishments;
Print Date: 02/25/2005
CaseConditons
Page 2 of 2
Feb. 25 2005 03:56PM
YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept
YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 97939855 Feb.25 03:53PM 02'19 SND 04 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
Clearwater
Fax Cover Sheet
9
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave., 2nd Floor
Clearwater, FL 33756
Telephone: (727) 562-4567
Fax: (727) 562-4865
To. 2A446
Fax: S5
Phone: `713. 9t
From: M6C L 0A rC ,., Q
Date: ' -
-tip o-!
Subject:
Message:
.n?Ile
Number of pages including cover sheet
API
"Clearwater
U
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
FAX: '7 2`7 ' -7 q ; - 9 355-
Phone:
_Phone:
FROM: M a r G MC LCMA-10 -Phone:
DATE:
UBJECT:
PM.
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PA
-J A RC
•
:35 pm Case Numbe : FLD200f1009 -- 665 BAY ESPLANADE
Owner(s) Melodie A Ferguson
665 Bay Esplanade
Clearwater, F133767
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
,?-D *Representative
Keith Zayac
701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404
Safety Harbor, Fl 34695
TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855.,E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com
Location: 0.259-acres located at the south side of Bay Esplande, approximately 600 feet east of
Poinsettia Avenue.
Atlas Page: 258A
Zoning District: T, Tourist
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwelling units with a reduction to
the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 51 feet; an increase in height from 35 feet to 59
feet to top of roof deck, an additional 3.5 feet to the top of mansard roof (from roof deck)
and an additional 11.75 feet for stair/elevator tower (from roof deck) and architectural
embellishment; a reduction in the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to zero feet to pool
deck, 3.5 feet to pool and 18 feet to building as a Flexible Development project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.B.
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings
Development Reyiew Agenda - Thursday, March 3, 2005 - Page 12
Neighborhood Clea._* Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): 2544 Frisco Drive
Clearwater, F133761
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association
Association(s): 100 Devon Dr
Clearwater, Fl 33767
TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com
Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16
Association(s): 845 Bayway Blvd
Clearwater, F133767
TELEPHONE: 535-2424, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17
Association(s): 868 Bayway Blvd #212
Clearwater, F133767 -
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1
Association(s): 895 S Gulfview Blvd
Clearwater, F133767
TELEPHONE: 530-4517, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House
Association(s): 851 Bayway Blvd
Clearwater, F133767
TELEPHONE: 727-441-8212, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: cpoint7@knology.net
Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail
Association(s): 800 S Gulfview Blvd
Clearwater, Fl 33767
TELEPHONE: 727-442-0664, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: clwpt8@tampabay.rr.com
Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19
Association(s): 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104
Clearwater, F133767
TELEPHONE: 447-0290, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
resenter: Marc Mariano, Consulting Planner
Notes: '
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 3, 2005 - Page 13
Feb. 28 2005 11:26AM
YOUR LOGO CityOiClearwater-Plan Dept
YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 97939855 Feb.28 11:24AM 01'42 SND 03 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329).
0 CITY OF CLARWATER
Cle,arwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM
February 03, 2005
Keith Zayac
701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404
Safety Harbor, F134695
RE: FLD2005-01009 -- 665 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Completeness
Dear Keith Zayac :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2005-01009. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Complete.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on March 03,
2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services'Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown
Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one
week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your
representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have
regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the
meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4626 or
Marc.Mariano@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
Marc Mariano
Consulting Planner
?n4y Lsf?s "Ata 1? sc-st?9
Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-01009 - 665 BAY ESPLANADE -T4:z?- )44 - r% ZA%(A t
e
Tr,,,,?sm i ss i on Report
Date/Time
Local ID
Local Name
Company Logo
This document was confirmed.
(reduced sample and details below)
Document Size Letter-S
tr
_ mater
U
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2a Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-M65
Ta ? i7tr ? `f
FA%:??? 743-9? S
A
»no
7??4,1 ? I,-r?,fr? r ?? • s?z• 4?mg
DATx: ?. al. QSrFCT: Fiaacsos-ot4og
NuMB6R OF PAG SONCLUDING THIS PAGE) f2l
Total Pages Scanned 2 Total Pages Confirmed 2
2- 2-05; 2:31PM
7275624796
No. Doc Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Mode Comments Results
1 7 979398SS 2- 2-OS; 2:29PM 1'34^ 2/ 2 EC CP 9600
Notes
EC: Error Correct RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote MB: Receive to Mailbox
BC: Broadcast Send MP: Multi-Poll PG: Polling a Remote PI: Power interruption
CP: Completed RM: Receive to Memory DR: Document Removed TM: Terminated by user
HS: Host Scan HP: Host Print FO: Forced Output WT: Waiting Transfer
HF: Host Fax HR: Host Receive FM: Forward Mailbox Doc. WS: Waiting Send
Clearwater
U
TO:
FAX:
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2"d Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
)max
2.7 ? -29`3 - '?l `3 S S
Phone•
FRO
?z.7 - S?Z - 4 ??
DATE: C;?' • oZ - oS SUBJECT:
t5 ac?o:S--dlvlz!g
fE Tti`'?4 G t 1 E?j
MESSAGE: L. ?f?SE Z->Ec-
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
LL CITY OF CLE4kRWATER
Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W . MYC LEARW AT ER. C OM
February 02, 2005
Keith Zayac
701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404
Safety Harbor, F134695
RE: FLD2005-01009 -- 665 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Keith Zayac :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2005-01009. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments.
Provide stormwater documents as required with application.
Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development
review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed
complete. Please resubmit by January 7, 2005 (12:00 noon),
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4626 or
Marc.Mariano@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
Marc Mariano
Consulting Planner
Letter oflncompleteness - FLD2005-01009 - 665 BAY ESPLANADE
1? - W
Flexible Development Application - Map Request
Planner Name: Marc Mariano
Case Numbers: FLD2005-01009
Date Requested: February 17, 2005
Date Requested for (date): February 24, 2005
Maps Requested
® Location Map
® Aerial Map
® Zoning Map
® Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering
® Legal Description
® Survey
® Map with Proposed Site Highlighted
Map Name
Owner: Melodie A. Ferguson Trust and Robert M. 11
( Cases:
FLD2005-01009
Pennock Trust
Site: 665 Bay Esplanade Property
Size(Acres): 0.259
i
PIN:
05/29/15/54756/077/0060
Atlas Page: 258A
CITY OF C LEARWATE R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
May 27, 2005
Keith Zayac
701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404
Safety Harbor, F134695 ff aa
?LI??rV
RE: Development Order - Case No. FT.D2005-n1 O
665 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Zayac:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for
Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum
lot width from 100 feet to 51 feet; an increase in height from 35 feet to 59 feet to top of roof deck, an
additional 3.5 feet to the top of mansard roof (from roof deck) and an additional 11.75 feet for
stair/elevator tower (from roof deck) and architectural embellishment; a reduction in the rear (south)
setback from 20 feet to zero feet to pool deck, 3.5 feet to pool and 18 feet to building as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal is in compliance with the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design where the
preferred form of development is low- to mid-rise new single-family dwellings and townhouses.
2. The proposal is in compliance with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Project per Section 2-803.F.
3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and
designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR
FRANK HiBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYI' I-L1m[LTON, COUNCIUMEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEAIBER CARLEN A. PETERSE•N, COUNCIUNIENIBER
"EQUAL E^1PLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION E%ILOYER"
0 6
May 27, 2005
Zayac - Page Two
4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground.
Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall
be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected
utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to
be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the
commencement of work;
5. That a $200 Recreation Facility impact fee be paid for each new unit prior to issuance of building
permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824;
6. That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an
occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930; and
7. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (April 19, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within
one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive
owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to
exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may
approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to
initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.1 by the applicant or by any person granted party. status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 3, 2005 (14 days
from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark T. Parry Consulting Planner, at 727-562-
4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
t4 ???t".i114t is21L citl3'.:C1T}1 C?i_ (c f?` 3t2311.S7 `Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
Michae e , A CP
Planning Director
S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX(FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDMBay Esplanade 665 (7) - 3.3.05 DRC- MTPIBay Esplanade
665 Development Order.doc
9 0
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
y ,t { 11' MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
May 27, 2005
Keith Zayac
701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404
Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 cuu `?
RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-01009
665 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Zayac:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for
Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum
lot width from 100 feet to 51 feet; an increase in height from 35 feet to 59 feet to top of roof deck, an
additional 3.5 feet to the top of mansard roof (from roof deck) and an additional 11.75 feet for
stair/elevator tower (from roof deck) and architectural embellishment; a reduction in the rear (south)
setback from 20 feet to zero feet to pool deck, 3.5 feet to pool and 18 feet to building as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal is in compliance with the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design where the
preferred form of development is low- to mid-rise new single-family dwellings and townhouses.
2. The proposal is in compliance with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Project per Section 2-803.F.
3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and
designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYI' HAAIICI'ON, COLINClumEMBER
BILL iONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COLNCIUMEMBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE AC'T'ION FMPLOYER"
May 27, 2005
Zayac - Page Two
4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to,the proposed building) be placed underground.
Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall
be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected
utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to
be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the
commencement of work;
5. That a $200 Recreation Facility impact fee be paid for each new unit prior to issuance of building
permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824;
6. That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an
occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930; and
7. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (April 19, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within
one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive
owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to
exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may
approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to
initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-5023 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 3, 2005 (14 days
from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark T. Parry Consulting Planner, at 727-562-
4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
V77-N, *Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
Michae W, A CP
Planning Director
S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 665 (T) - 3.3.05 DRC - MTPIBay Esplanade
665 Development Order.doc
E, - I
fem., i I:
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
CITY OF C LEARWATE R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
May 27, 2005
Keith Zayac
701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404
Safety Harbor, F134695
RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-01009
665 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Zayac:
J
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for
Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum
lot width from 100 feet to 51 feet; an increase in height from 35 feet to 59 feet to top of roof deck, an
additional 3.5 feet to the top of mansard roof (from roof deck) and an additional 11.75 feet for
stair/elevator tower (from roof deck) and architectural embellishment; a reduction in the rear (south)
setback from 20 feet to zero feet to pool deck, 3.5 feet to pool and 18 feet to building as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal is in compliance with the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design where the
preferred form of development is low- to mid-rise new single-family dwellings and townhouses.
2. The proposal is in compliance with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Project per Section 2-803.F.
3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and
designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOPI' HAMILTON, COVNCIf MEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCIB4EbiBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COLINCILNIBIBER
"EQLIAI. EN4PLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
•
May 27, 2005
Zayac - Page Two
•
4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground.
Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall
be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected
utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to
be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the
commencement of work;
5. That a $200 Recreation Facility impact fee be paid for each new unit prior to issuance of building
permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824;
6. That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an
occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930; and
7. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (April 19, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within
one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive
owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to
exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may
approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to
initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party. status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 3, 2005 (14 days
from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark T. Parry Consulting Planner, at 727-562-
4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
?t?i.ccn? l°:cl t>! tlniii?!. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
Michael e A CP
Planning Director
S: (Planning DeparlmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending caseslUp for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 665 (7) - 3.3.05 DRC - MTPIBay Esplanade
665 Development Order.doc
BAY ESPLANADE AT
CLEARWATER BE
2110 DREW ST # 100
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231
PARALITICCI, JESUS
611 POINSETTIA AVE # 103
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
STANLEY, BRYAN J
114 TURNER ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 -
SOBOLESKI, JAMES W
191 DEVON DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
VERBAN,STEVE
VERBAN, HELEN K
55 SOMERSET ST
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546
WHITE, ANDREA P
55 SOMERSET ST # 4
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546
FIVE PALM CONDO ASSN INC
673 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503
SILLASEN, SEAJAYE
12313 W LOUISIANA AVE
LAKEWOOD CO 80228 -
D'ARRIGO, STEPHEN V
11 ARLENE AVE
WILMINGTON MAO 1887 - 1111
BANNON, MARY KATHLEEN
TRUST
8013 WILDWOOD LN
DARIEN LL 60561 - 5914
E_S-?lox%de. - FED 2_005- O 100 q
BORUTA, SCOTT V •BAY ESPLANADE APTS INC
611 POINSETTIA AVE # 101 2110 DREW STE STE 100
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231
MICHAEL, BASKOVICH
MICHAEL, SANDRA
2866 QUAIL HOLLOW RD W
CLEARWATER FL 33761 -
PARKS, DANA L
BARKES, MICHAEL G
11961 LOCUST LN
COLUMBUS IN 47201 -
BRUGGE, KATHLEEN
BRUGGE, RICHARD
2628 SUNLIGHT DR
ARLINGTON TX 76006 -
ANDRESON, DEAN
ANDRESON, ANN
2046 BRENDLA RD
CLEARWATER FL 33755 -
BOERNER, SUSANA B
112 S LAUBER WAY
TAMPA FL 33609 - 2615
HESSELSCHWERDT, BERND J
HESSELSCHWERDT, BERN-HARD
55 SOMERSET ST # 5
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546
EYLER, CYNTHIA A
HOLDEN, DONNA L
554 ADALINE AVE
VANDALIA OH 45377 - 1802
BANNON, MARY KATHLEEN
TRUST
8013 WIL,DWOOD LN
DARIEN II, 60561 - 5914
CIUCEVICH, JOSEPH
736 BRUCE AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1418
RHOADS, JEFFREY L THE
PO BOX 861
DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0861
GLENNON, VICTORIA
10521 E 1700 N RD
PONTIAC IL 61764 -
CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN
55 SOMERSET ST # 3
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546
DE BELLIS, BARBARA
55 SOMERSET ST # 3
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546
PALMA, GEORGE
32 FORGE DR
DOWNSVIEW ON M3N 2R3 00030
CANADA
NEIL, MARIE-THERESE
4 RUE DE SAVOIE
PARIS 75006 00017 -
FRANCE
YOUNG, SEAN
673 BAY ESPLANADE # 105
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503
RADAY, DAVID M
YOUNG, SEAN
12003 LILLIAN AVE N
SEMINOLE FL 33778 - 3504
SNO-BIRD PROP INC
10 PRINCE ST
CUMBERLAND CTR ME 04021 -
4007
EYLER, DONALD C
EYLER, CYNTHIA A
554 ADALINE AVE
VANDALIA OH 45377 - 1802
HOLDEN, ROBERT L
12 STILLWATER HEIGHTS DR
WEST BOYLSTON MA 01583 - 1122
LJ
BOYES, JAMES R
BOYES, GEORGIA
969 BRUCE AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1013
WINCHESTER, GARY
WINCHESTER, PAMELA
17111 HANNA RD
LUTZ FL 33549 - 5666
KEYS, RANDALL D WICKY, JERRY E
KEYS, SUZANNE J WICKY, BETTY W
6713 WHITEWAY DR 231 LAFAYETTE BLVD
TEMPLE TERRACE FL 33617 - 3216 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 3754
WHITEHURST, DON R WAGNER, LARRY H THE
1801 SE US HIGHWAY 19 240 WINDWARD PSE # 1202
CRYSTAL RIVER FL 34429 - 9065 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2249
ARDENT INTERNATIONAL LTD
LIABI
2840 EAST BAY DR # 363
LARGO FL 33771 - 2408
BEACH & GULF SANDS INC
657 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1515
KELLEY,PAUL
KELLEY,TRACEY
667 BAY ESPLANDE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1550
PETER PAN DEV
610 MANDALAY NE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1632
BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC
627 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
TSETSE LLC
5210 WEBB RD
TAMPA FL 33615 - 4518
VASII.OUDES, PANAYIOTIS
VASIL,OUDES, HELEN
767 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH
DEVELOP
PO BOX 4189
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189
FRANKS, VIRGINIA B
669 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503
BAY ESPLANADE
617 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617
TSE TSE LLC
610 MANDALAY AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
THURMOND, WILLIAM H
THURMOND, CAROL H
PO BOX 478
NEW ELLENTON SC 29809 - 0478
•
KROMER, JOHN
KROMER, JANET
10317 GREEN LINKS DR
TAMPA FL 33626 -
JAKSCH, ROBERT W
1596 SHIRLEY PL
LARGO FL 33770 - 2218
WINCHESTER, GARY T
WINCHESTER, PAMELA S
17111 HANNA RD
LUTZ FL 33549 - 5666
SPRING TIDE INVESTMENTS II
LLC
622 BYPASS DR STE 100
CLEARWATER FL 33764 -
VASILOUDES, PANAYIOTIS
VASILOUDES, HELEN
767 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
FERGUSON, MELODIE A
PENNOCK, ROBERT M
665 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1598
EPIC HOLDINGS SOUTH
139 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502
COATES I INC
873 ISLAND WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1826
TSE TSE LLC
610 MANDALAY AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
ALBRECHT, YVETTE
16 ASHENDEN WALK
FARNHAM COMMON BUCKS SL2
3UF 00009 -
UNITED KINGDOM
•
DEAN REAL ESTATE INVINC PORPOISE INN INC .PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE
647 BAY ESPLANADE 609 CYPRUS AVE 419 EASTSHORE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1621 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028
DE BENEDITTIS, FRANK 108 5TH ST LLC LA RISA DEVELOPMENT CO LLC
DE BENEDITTIS, NANCY 9 SUNSET BAY DR 880 MANDALAY AVE # C-908
4602 104TH ST BELLEAIR FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
CORONA NY 11368 - 2813
LA RISA DEVELOPMENT CO LLC PENTHOUSE SHORES ASSN INC FITZGERALD, RONALD
880 MANDALAY AVE # C-908 661 POINSETTIA AVE 665 POINSETTIA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1561 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1530
DOM, MARY NICHOLAS, JERRY LA RISA DEVELOPMENT CO LLC
65 SOMERSET ST 3002 STRAWBERRY RD #OFC 880 MANDALAY AVE # C-908
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1547 PASADENA TX 77502 - 5230 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
LA RISA DEVELOPMENT CO LLC LA RISA DEVELOPMENT CO LLC COQUINA APTS INC
880 MANDALAY AVE # C-908 880 MANDALAY AVE # C-908 692 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1500
LEWINSKI, HANNA FORLINI, DOMENICO G CZIPRI, BRENDA K THE
LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH 808 MANDALAY AVE 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338
661 POINSETTA AVE #306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1324 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537
CZIPRI, BRENDA K THE CZIPRI, BRENDA K THE DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC
334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 90 MILVAN DR
PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 TORONTO ON M91 1Z6 00030 -
CANADA
DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC
90 MILVAN DR 90 MILVAN DR 90 MILVAN DR
TORONTO ON M91, 1Z6 00030 - TORONTO ON M91, 1Z6 00030 - TORONTO ON M9L 1Z6 00030 -
CANADA CANADA CANADA
GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED NATSIS, EVANGELOS SPEAR, ROBERT E THE
PO BOX 152206 NATSIS, MARIA 102 CARRIAGE SQUARE CT
IRVING TX 75015 - 2206 622 POINSETTIA AVE HENDERSONVILLE NC 28791 - 1396
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1638
SPERELAKIS, NICHOLAS SR PASQUALE, JACK R THE LONG, MARIAN C
SPERELAKIS, DOLORES J PASQUALE, PATRICIA A THE 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 104
12114 PAULMEADOWS DR 1433 NORMAN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534
CINCINNATI OH 45249 - 1330 DARIEN IL 60561 - 4434
SPERELAKIS, NICHOLAS SR
SPERELAKIS, DOLORES J
12114 PAULMEADOWS DR
CINCINNATI OH 45249 - 1330
FOLEY, DONALD F
FOLEY, CATHERINE G
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 108
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534
MERRITT, GORDON E
MERRITT, M SUZANNA
661 POINSETTIA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1561
MC FADDEN, ARLENE S
MC FADDEN, ROBERT G
661 POINSETTIA AVE #204
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535
GEOMAR HOLDINGS INC
115 ARGYLE
KIRKLAND QC H9H 3H9 00030 -
CANADA
MC KINNEY, CARMELLA C
MC KINNEY, GEORGE L
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 210
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535
LENTRICCHIA, DOMENICK
LENTRICCHIA, KARIN
814 NARCISSUS AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334
LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH
LEWINSKI, HANNA
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 306
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537
SEIFERT, MICHAEL E
SEIFERT, NANCY S
5825 PERSIMMON DR
MADISON WI 53711 - 5003
L.J
SMITH, RUPERT W JR
SMITH, IRENE V
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 106
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1534
MC SWEENEY, GARY W
MC SWEENEY, CARMEN
20942 E GLEN HAVEN CIR
NORTHVILLE MI 48167 - 2465
BEARDSLEY, JAMES M
15 MAYFAIR LN
BUFFALO NY 14201 - 1522
PIOLI, RICHARD T THE
PIOLI, ROBERTA B THE
750 ISLAND WAY # 402
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1820
ROLLINSON, ANN C
1364 ELLINGTON RD
SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 - 2600
MOSSER, RICHARD S
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 301
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1536
HAYS, WILLIAM D
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 304
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1536
MAVITY, LEON L
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 307
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537
ROZENITS, FRED
ROZENITS, ANNA
31 ISLAND WAY # 1002
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2207
SHUDEBRAND, WILLIAM O JR
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 107
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534
166363 ONTARIO LTD
152 CLARENDON ST .
SOUTHAMPTON ON NOH 2L0
00030-
CANADA
BERETA, STANLEY D THE
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 203
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535
THOMPSON, MICHAEL S
THOMPSON, MARIA
BRENDON FEN POND RD
IGTHEHM
NEAR SEVEN OAKS
TKF.NT TN15 9T. 00001 _
ARMBRUSTER, JOHN
661 POINSETTIA AVE # 209
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535
WOSCHITZ, EVA THE
302 POINSETTIA LAND TRUST
10 COURTWOOD PL
TORONTO ON M2K 1Z9 00030 -
CANADA
LETOURNEAU, WILLIAM T
HIRSCH, DEBORA A
395 16TH ST
NEWPORT MN 55055 - 1061
KIELMANN, LOTHAR E
KIELMANN, WENDY
35154 LEON ST
LIVONIA MI 48150 - 2668
KEITH ZAYAC, P.E.
701 ENTERPRISE RD E SUITE 404
SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695
CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS JAY KEYES CLEARWATER POINT 1 BEACH
COALITION CLEARWATER BEACH ASSOC. HOUSE 16
2544 FRISCO DR 100 DEVON DR 845 BAYWAY BLVD
CLEARWATER, FL 33761 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 CLEARWATER, FL 33767
CLEARWATER POINT 3 MARINA
HOUSE 17
868 BAYWAY BLVD #212
CLEARWATER, FL 33767
40
CLEARWATER POINT 4 ISLAND
HOUSE 1
895 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CLEARWATER, FL 33767
0
CLEARWATER POINT 7 INC
YACHT HOUSE
851 BAYWAY BLVD
CLEARWATER, FL 33767
CLEARWATER POINT 8 CLEARWATER POINT 5 ADMIRAL
SHIPMASTER, SAII, HOUSE 19 FLD2005-01009
800 S GULFVIEW BLVD 825 S GULFVIEW BLVD #104 665 Bay Esplande
CLEARWATER, FL 33767 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 Mark Parry
•
Keith avac Associates. Inc.
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning
March 9, 2005
Mr. Mark Parry
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE: FLD2005-01009 665 BAY ESPLANADE
?IA R I U 2005
PLPJ
Dear Mr. Parry: Z I CAF=
Enclosed please find fifteen sets of required information in response to the DRC Sufficiency
comments for this project including the following items.
ENGINEERING CONDITION
1. Utility note 11 has been added to sheet 6 of 9 addressing sanitary lateral
construction.
2. Utility notes 12 to 14 have been added to sheet 6 of 9 addressing comments 1-4.
FIRE CONDITION
1. It is acknowledge that the DRC review is not an approval or review of any
construction plans or documents other than the site work.
2. A freestanding FDC at least 15 feet away from the building and within 40 feet of the
fire hydrant has been added to sheet 6 of 9.
IRRIGATION CONDITION
1. An Irrigation Plan has been added to this submittal.
LANDSCAPE OR I ?1
1. The utility lines have been added to the landscape plan. NA L
PARKS AND RECS CONDITION
1. Note 18 has been added to sheet 4 of 9 regarding the recreation impact fee.
•
701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
keith&keithzayac.com
L
STORMWATER CONDITION
•
•
1. A field site review was conducted and the yard drain has apparently been removed at
some time and no longer exists. It has therefore been removed from the plans.
2. Additional grades and cross sections have been added in the rear yards on sheet 5 of
9.
SOLID WASTE SERVICE
1. Note 19 has been added to sheet 4 of 9 regarding the dumpster service.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
1.. The City standard disabled parking and sign detail is included on sheet 4 of 9.
2. A dual door has been added to the elevator to provide access from the
handicapped space to the lobby and out to the public sidewalk.
3. A sidewalk has been added to provide an accessible route from the building to
the public sidewalk.
ZONING
1. The application has been changed to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
application.
2. The compatibility of the existing character of the surrounding neighborhood and
recently approved projects with the project is addressed in the attachments to the
application, and has been embellished with attachment C in this resubmittal.
3. The west elevation has been revised to be more consistent with the other
elevations of the building.
Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA
President
Keith. Zayac & Associates, Inc.
7n 7%,
MAR i 0 2005
PLANMI - '"IITMENT
CITY OF Cl.?;,ZVU, I":FR
OR I
2'S b
C
1 L- Q : F NA
k Z Z .S(a O. 2-79 Z2$ to $" y j?p e-
-7-77 OC' 1,3
1?eti. v C-V 1- 44 7J
lb .a o. i A')Nft
":? Z b
t
s c..
cz 01 aotn' - Seta
! ova F?v r:a -Pe, ;
a? ok -- 'ti v1' e v A.
, .- - o G 2 a r s? \,.j o r k JAS'
4 * •
t / - lwq Si,rwry l,eblrvW +°ewe.r Abl s f NAO - I h 6,Y
ep cc. - eaM1lp Ra.erw ? ?.. .C D. - PeFr a a. - Cwl
- wC D ? DwJ b - ve.avb L saek?el? ?
na B.wl4M d 01 - ? llsvE lee. K - ? NfII - grvwr.l
p p e. cno-l
ew.. - n....Mw,. ewlwe..r r e
cr»nw ev
o<?? w... ,ve. ea.erw.? an ro"! a. ".e.vD. lss rbx -all}
" e,Wa e.Rre.,. of a. e,...r. n h ew eroe,,.,.Orr ro
SCALE: I 20'
„x ee a er..'? Win, e. A ? wti ..a..?. s m,r emQ rar.
a exn,,..
is
This property I- within Flnod Zane. AE _as dpice ted on Flnod h..curnnrn
Rate Map Community Panel 4/ 125096 0007D Oatcd: g- 19_91
BENCHMARK-' B.M.D. 'AWL USC£ 1941" AfAP,f 145 ELEV. =7.985
BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: 10.0'
BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE NORTHWESTERLY RAW OF BAY ESPLANADE
BOIJAMW suRVEy..
LOT 6, BLOCK 77. MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, PUBLIC 17E-
FLORIDA. ORDS OF PlNft LAS COnNTV,
LOWEST FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION - 724•
AVERAGE GROUND ELEV - 5.5'
p PG.
rte,
4 nro "wD
(A5P PAVEMENT) 41
2' CONC `<60 _ ? '
CURB
I ? rw0 NdD
. ?. - rJxrcrzscwl
Ilo ??)
nm .• ..• cu I I r"D ,yr m
!.o /J q?_ ?I Aa/ smaJ ? . d?ti ?!
P.C. U:m Ill' D t 1 PCK ° . •c,
°M T COLUMN °y
I yo'
F6ENw006 ;6•
o i LOT; 6
.: d
BLOCK-77
N
1
Curve number 1 (M)
Radius= 64.17
Radius= 64'(R)
Delta= 35'16'02"
Arc= 39.50
Arc= 42'(R)
Tongent= 20.40
Chord= 38.88
Chord Brg. S.65'53'47"W.
LOT 7
BLOCK 77
sr
sr?
o BAs r'
,I= ASPHALT o ?J
4; IRON
Pool
LOT 5
BLOCK 77 tv S1NR? CONC DECK
?
? BRICK
roo• ti" gALf.ONY
WALK v rD.o• ° '
BALCONY o COMPLEX la
„r
o TWO STORY 4-UNIT MA? 2 4? -
1665 (UNITS-
0
BALCONY
STAIRS STAIRS 0-
BALCONY J? _LCON" DAVIT
CONC CO NC
M cur / 1/
wD /) on rnv •.r cur I.?.' CONC
D.r pn 11 SEAWALL
48.46'(44)
WOOD
DOCK 'A
CLEARWATER
REVISED
OFFICE LOCATION., IJ05 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.
CLEARWATER• FLORIDA J4616
NOT VAL40 WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND
THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA
LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER.
PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO:
ROBERT M. PENNOCK
MELODIE A. FERGUSON
ALFORO, BARBER & MARIAN/
ATTORNEY TITLE INSURANCE FUND INC.
BARNETT BANK OF PINELLAS COUNTY
9S
CONC - - t
DAVIT
Curve number 2 (M)
woon __ ___ ___ ___
DOCK
Radius= 1 10.00(?&M)
Delta= 46-4932'
Arc= 89.90
Tangent= 4763
BAY Chord= 87.42
Chord Brg. 56756'40"W
Aeee
TARGET LAND SURVEYING INC.
P.O. POX 663
DUNEDIN, FL 34 69 7-0 663 PH (813) 784-.057j
I he-by certify that this survrty wos made under my rngrnns,hin
charge •nd meets Ore mi,imum TechniCal Standards os set fwllr
by thF Florida Board cT Professicnal Land S-cyars i•, Chapter
61 G 17, Flaridc Ad•ninietmtlve Cade. pursuant to Sectinn 472,077
Florida Statutes Fiold Surve
Y? 8,-28 _96_
U) Philip C. Stock Faj 316 _Pg_35
_
RLS 73035, LB 115570 JObf_ 96.0827.05.
8 -.30-96 Drawn By: 0. A4ARISCAL
DATE OF CERTIFICATION Sur-n, n„ nn c1-1
I ,,fft ?i
x9t ?Ri F & S rr1 r ?41; j 6 L! ?o o Sk+a
! Hx• i f
,
s tom= >$ + 1 C tP, ? ,i ;. „?? r t V 3 `7-.11 C
_ ? ,r ? .„ ....... ___,•?? ? ?tea ?? ..,.4,t,, : _ _
?j
?• 4.
,
f"i
. I l i6r BAY
qF
,Cry: /`,/' I ! I _R
??R r?-?:kT bV?tY J2 ' : ,. :'• - :... ?, ? •? ?/ ?? !4 _.....-__ sj1i
?v`
r rf . ',
due. a Emil,
AZ)
e fl
'M r +_3 Eta i'?'
k„ LOT 7
BL K Ti el?
rz1;
LOT 6 :>t
E?
SLY, 77
APPROVED V1100D FENCE
CITY r
" P %191
MUM
r
tfi
? sf??r4l,3 l '? ?
"
kle
a
a
t1 F ? 2 11...
NAIL
Y :'r U 00p 3 4 ' • :
EV,
----- ------
----
S J' 3 ? f *si 5
_ s
-s - = -
F W,.K,.CV7
OK AKAWAUL
!t , ; t
.; w
7 LA. CUIREia R, PEN,
1 ^' A P6Aa.
`c ?? ieikl `.1 frs? DRAWN +T Y
. Y a?? A?p^ ..•
C ? ?L??ooS=oldo? lb ?,
ITY OF f, LEARAT E R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
May 27, 2005
Keith Zayac
701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404
Safety Harbor, Fl 34695
RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2 OS-0 t nng
665 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Zayac:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for
Flexible Development approval to permit five attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum
lot width from 100 feet to 51 feet; an increase in height from 35 feet to 59 feet to top of roof deck, an
additional 3.5 feet to the top of mansard roof (from roof deck) and an additional 11.75 feet for
stair/elevator tower (from roof deck) and architectural embellishment; a reduction in the rear (south)
setback from 20 feet to zero feet to pool deck, 3.5 feet to pool and 18 feet to building as a Comprehensive
Mll Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal is in compliance with the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design where the
preferred form of development is low- to mid-rise new single-family dwellings and townhouses.
2. The proposal is in compliance with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Project per Section 2-803.F.
3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and
designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
BRIAN J. AUNGSr, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYr HAMILTON, COUNCHAIEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILNIDWR
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACT1oN EAII'LOYEW'
- YYlll6wlu i m ?i it
May 27, 2005
Zayac - Page Two
4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground.
Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall
be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected
utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to
be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the
commencement of work;
5. That a $200 Recreation Facility impact fee be paid for each new unit prior to issuance of building
permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824;
6. That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an
occupational license or certificate of occupa i. fld& " ntact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930; and
7. That a condominium plat be recorded prior t?s of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (April 19, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within
one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive
owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to
exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may
approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to
initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.1 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 3, 2005 (14 days
from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark T. Parry Consulting Planner, at 727-562-
4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
*Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
Michae e , A CP
Planning Director
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 665 (7) - 3.3.05 DRC - MTPIBay Esplanade
665 Development order.doc