Loading...
FLS2005-12098r s Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 { {' _ Fax:727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ _--__ CASE #: ---------------------- DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ------ ATLAS PAGE #: __--_------------- ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: -____- SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: --------------- SOUTH: -? ----------- --- WEST: ----- -- ---- EAST: _-------------- * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, (Revised 12/30/2004) ---PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: C------------- PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) [l _ AGENT NAME:j ?SLL?'T_'v' t-(L'E, ?r -_ ), ' MAILING ADDRESS: ?I I-lv(G?l/y?S?Yr4"? !? -7 --- f-'- S3 PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 7 ?---7 -------- _ "? 'y - E-MAIL ADDRESS: _?f ! t r (f f ?G CELL NUMBER: ? 1?1` ?- B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202,A) ?' l r 1 STREET ADDRESS of subject site:__5b LEGAL DESCRIPTION: v? ----------------- (if not liste here, ease n to the location ?°f t fiis doouv rrye t 1n the submittal) ! , ry PARCEL NUMBER: -?_???------- V. 7 PARCEL SIZE: (acres, square feet ?n RECEIVED PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): _-=-,{---C(1?__=Q-L1 --------------------- -__.---------------- (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) JUL 2 19 2906 --- --- ---- - ----- PEA{itNfFd rPARTIVEIIN DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): CITY OF CLEARWATE - i,6 ;? - . ---------- ---------- --_-s- _ Lii,?y W Attach sheets and be specific when Identifying the request (Include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater i DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) 10/SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ,a Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 4 l?Z.? /1 Ga 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. p ? Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District ORJI G waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: RECEIVED z'gJUL 212005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City 'Of Clearwater 0 0 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with t City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. © At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Ll- Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): 1 Stormwater plan as noted above is included );48- Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall bi provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 5624750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) a-/SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ;]TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; Q- LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; pgPARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; .Z3,-"GRADING PLAN, as applicable, PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) 2 SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ORIGINAL All dimensions; RECEIVED North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; c Location map; !I IL r? 1 2aQJ _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; JU Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; PLANNING DEPARTMENT All required setbacks: CITY OF CLEARWATER All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater •? Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. Al SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. SY REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; V-__FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel, _ All open space areas; _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: _ All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; - Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; - Sight visibility triangles; - Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; - Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); - Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; _ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; _ Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. p? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. ORIGINAL RECEIVED jIJ{_ 212005 Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. 0,1- BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; /REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. ,l. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ?-? - 7- -- -/-- All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Reduced signage proposal (8'/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ®' Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 01--"Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of 9ye- aa0d.3post-devel po+me t I els of service for all roadway legs,and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meetin? ?7 Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the u der ' gned, acknowledge that all representations made in this applic ion re true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and auth ize ity representatives to visit and photograph the property des, ibe n this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS worn to and subscribed before me this day of ? D. 2 r' to me and/or by L? yc- "Cio is personally known has produced AJ g- as of property owner or representative N-o u.blic, My commission expires: RECEIVED ?oDOREEN A. WILLIAMS JUL 212006 C 4 M`! COMMISSfON # DD 155802 EXP{RES: October 1 4, 2006 PLANNING DEPAR?iVi?`N Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City o I'? NOTAFY FL Notary Service rBonding, Inc. CITY OF CLEARWATER AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: PLGJS -? GC 0-0 PETEA T fiisTMCE40 CVo (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. Tha Goa we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): So1? SzS B?LCfIF/? D Ct67AAWd7'F=N L- 33 7 (ay (rIALFTOaAy N-47-A-1 PhkCEL Ig/?9//G/ooooo??sofosoo J2a eyoD X20 X2/0 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 2A Ao3o 0 ?ETtFA aF 4VTft oRI -z A-Tt6N Fo/i No 14S f 6!PCVAEEINO9T115 /pIE 41V(2NEN 0&, To AcT- A9 A --&,vr FoA ri-tIs 4 C0 1- 7_d To EXceYTIC 000YMeNTS SECYAiNd- PEAMIT-9 i4N0 RPPACVAL5 FdltC-OVSTAi4ci roNouT,?6 HoPEATY 3. That the undersigned (ha have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: H o uS a t!r o y,4FAs Northside Engineering as ON /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Etcts 4 co- 1.TD Rblec /A? F0 rroperty Omer Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 22 day of personally appeared e -ej L?c?i -1r-r-PI'Lc who having been first duly sworn Aj6V?j%j,e,r - Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. -oP?Y P(,a Irene L. Goroshko JA-g' OY 20 ' Notary Public My Commission Expires: * Commission # DD324378 '°9 ,ot Expires June 15, 2008 OF;dF Bonded Tr*y Fain • Insurance Inc. 6*3W7019 ORIGINAL RECEIVED Documentl JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with Northside Engineering to act as agent for Ellis and Co. Ltd. and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and C. uIFT-v A A Y PI.A a approvals for the construction on the property located at Sol -Sz S BUCNEA D lying with iw Pinellas County, State of Florida. PAov e0t !gl zy116looooo13.1 oloso0 33o I c Yo 0 Co L7'O 3126 0300 gX24 A?". (' Fa Signatui of Property Owner 3Y 0) - 0 4 ANC,-6 57'4,64-7- Address of Property Owner ?T#A PON SM W -s Fl- 3 Y4 S 7 City / State / Zip Code FAI / r ? Co . ' ?r ?PE7EA 7 ftiSTo/tcULI Print Name of Property Owner C_ F0 (7z7) 9'3 ?1^ o I6 0 Telephone Number State of Florida The foregoing instrument was acknowled ed before me this day Count of Pinellas g ofA&LId, 20fj.15 , by E p('5 r jj dy' ?Np 'er as c' who is personally known to me or who has produced o as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. X 3 M T N r •? gyp, Notary Public jj 5 0 (Signature) = Commission # OD 40 03 1?plY;?.C9?s'?SiIKi'(Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) (Se ove ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER U FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project EXHIBIT `A' Gulf-to-Bay Plaza 07/18/06 501-525 Belcher Road DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Demolition of an existing retail shopping center. Re-construction of a retail shopping center consisting of an enlarged Publix Grocery Store (54,300 s.f.) and two separate retail parcels; Retail "B" consisting of 19,200 s.f. and Retail "A" consisting of 14,000 s.f. A reduction in the front setback from 25' to 15' (north and west) to pavement. Height increase from 25' to 35'. Reduction in parking from 438 to 404. Comprehensive Landscape Program. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The development is currently a retail sales center. The developer has purchased additional parcels of land; one which used to be a BBQ restaurant and the other used to be an express oil change business. The usage of the center will not be changing. The size of Publix will be increased and will now be located more towards Gulf-To-Bay along with retail shops fronting Gulf-To-Bay. Another retail building will be located to the south of Publix. Currently there are no plans for the two out-parcels on the site. To the south of the parcel is an eye care clinic, to the east is a mobile home park as well as to the west (across Belcher). The character and use of the site will not be changing. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development is not changing in use. The center has been in the same location for many years. There will not be any significant impairment of any adjacent uses. The property is zoned Commercial with a Land Use code of Commercial General. The re-development of retail is an acceptable use. With the increase of the square footage for Publix, this should make the surrounding residential zoned areas more marketable. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development will increase safety with persons residing and working in the neighborhood of the new re-development. Traffic will now easier within the center and we are making entering and exiting the center more vehicle friendly. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • Comprehensive Infill Project Exhibit `A' continued Page Two Gulf-to-Bay Plaza 501-525 Belcher Road 10 07/18/06 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The traffic pattern will not be changing for the shopping center. We have made the throats longer as to not have stacking along any streets. Along Gulf-to-Bay, there is a left turn lane which stacks approximately 3 cars. The drive isle into the center is long enough as to cars will be able to find a parking space and not hold up traffic coming off Gulf-to-Bay into the shopping center. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The character of the community of the immediate vicinity will not be changing. The proposed re-development is maintaining the same usage and is an acceptable use within its zoning code. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed re-development project will not have any adverse effects. The new shopping center will have a better drainage system and be more eye catching to the adjacent properties. All sight triangles have been met; there will not be any acoustic or olfactory problems. With newly designed buildings, this should be better if there were any prior incidences. Normal hours of operation will be adhered to. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 Comprehensive Infill Project Exhibit `A' continued 07/18/06 Page Three Gulf-to-Bay Plaza 501-525 Belcher Road COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The re-development of the parcel will be impractical without deviations. The setback variances being requested are in order to meet landscaping buffers and to accommodate parking for the increased square footages of the retail spaces in order to better serve customers. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements). The fair market value of abutting properties will not be reduced. The upgraded plaza with better drainage and parking improvements will have no affect on the value of surrounding properties, only increase. The current just market value based on the Pinellas County Property Appraisers office is $7,668,500 and the proposed value of the site with improvements is approximately $9,550,000.00 The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The current re-development project consists of retail sales. The current zoning is Commercial with a Land use Code of Commercial General. Retail sales is a permitted use within this zoning district per Section 2-702. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The current site has been operating as a retail center since 1970. Directly across Gulf- to-Bay is a small strip center consisting of retail sales. To the west of the re- development project is an eye clinic. All other surrounding parcels are mobile homes. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. Being in the same location for over 20 years, it is not feasible to move to another location. Publix will be the main anchor tenant for this shopping plaza, as it always has been. The owner's were able to acquire an additional two parcels which surround their existing property. Being Publix has established clientele in this area the project would not be viable in any other area of Clearwater. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER P_J Comprehensive Infill Project Exhibit `A' continued Page Four Gulf-to-Bay Plaza 501-525 Belcher Road 0 07/18/06 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. New buildings always upgrade the immediate vicinity. All sight triangles will be met and better drainage will service the site as well as a better parking system. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The character of the community will be enhanced by a new, larger grocery store. Parking has been met by code to accommodate all shoppers and now with a larger store, more people will be able to do more one-stop shopping. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. No lot width variance is being requested on this redevelopment. The request is to reduce the front and rear setbacks by 10' (from 25' to 15'). The side setbacks will remain at 10'. The property has two fronts and it is difficult to adhere to a 25' setback on both sides. The setbacks are to pavement. The buildings are setback from all property lines by a great distance. An increase in height is being requested from 25' to 35'. A one-story commercial building at 35' will give the center better visibility to shoppers. The reduction in parking is justified in an attached parking study. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parking proposed for development. The current parking formula for retail is based on 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of space per the Land Planners Association, although Clearwater code states 5/1,000 GSF. Based on these calculations, we are shy 34 parking spaces. This is justified in a parking study which is attached. No on-street parking is available. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 Article 3 (as applicable). N/A ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • Gulf to Bay Plaza FLS2006-12098 PARKING DEMAND STUDY .7 The request is for a reduction in parking from 438 required spaces (5 spaces / 1,000 gso to 404 spaces. The required 438 parking spaces required are per the City of Clearwater Code requirements. In researching the Urban Planner's Association guidelines, it has been determined that 4 spaces per thousand would be adequate for a shopping center. The site will consist of a Publix grocery store and several retail centers. The hours of the grocery store will run from 7:00 a.m. through 11:00 p.m.. Many of the retail centers will operate between the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The customer's visiting the grocery store, if they are in need to visit one of the retail centers will do so at the same time. The grocery store, although their hours of operation is 7 am to 11 pm will not have 100% occupancy at all times of operating hours. Many customers do work during the day and will be shopping after the hours of 6:00 p.m. when the retail centers will be closing. The parking throughout the shopping center will be shared with all tenants. Also, there is no guarantee that all the retail spaces will be leased. The site also has a mobile home park behind the center and across the street. Many of these patrons will not be arriving by vehicle, but walking. We feel with a reduction of only 34 spaces, the redevelopment project will have adequate parking spaces to accommodate all uses. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 'Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 /S'UBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION Z SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 03/29/2006) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: E111" - QC? Lq ?-7? - - -- - MAILING ADDRESS: ..............i<7Q.?C....._......U..../.,q.?....ow PHONE NUMBER: Cr?a.? q'3 g'-_ol_oQ _._......... _. PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: L_....._.?X V?.?.t.(1?._......f. PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: 22.7)_ Cq 0-94f 3 NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: -I l / . 7 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parggl proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. , PLANNING DEP?A?l16JRTM NT X:ICIw Applications12006 ApplicafionslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc Page 1 of 2 •eQa, 2. LIGHTING: • • Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the ar in which the parcel proposed for development is located. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the unde ig d, acknowledge that all representations made in this appli ati are true and accurate to the best of my knowled d authorize City representatives to visit and photogr h e property described in this application. of property owner or RECEIVED JUL 212006 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS srn o and subscribed before me thie'?t day of A.D. 20 to me and/or by who is personally known has produced s identification. ary public, My commission expires: i o , 4-o PLANNING DEPARTMENT X.-IClw ont3VA ifpfionslComprehensive Landscape Program Page 2 of 2 .?*r DOREEN A. WILLIAMS MY COMMISSION k DD 155802 °? & yXFLRNOtuyservlW6'B?nd??na ,-W,>& OTAR • 0 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM Gulf to Bay Plaza FLS2006-12098 The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comp. Landscape Program is more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitting on the parcel. The landscaping has exceed the required landscape buffer along the north and west sides of the property abutting to an arterial and local road. Although the buffer is meeting the 10' and 15' required, the planting materials are being exceeded with the number and types of plants. The lighting proposed will be through Progress Energy and will be operated during business hours only. The lights will also be down lighting as to not spread onto any adjacent properties. The landscape treatment proposed will be a dramatic enhancement to the community. Being on the corner of Belcher and Gulf-to-Bay, the landscaping in this area is minimum. The run-down strip shopping center directly across from our redevelopment project only has landscaping along the right-of-way. The proposed landscaping for this project will include many Live Oaks, Crepe Myrtles, Winged Elms, Sabal Palms and a variety of other species that not only create a buffer, but also give the site a nice greenery with a touch of tropical feel. The landscaping proposed will have beneficial impact on the value of properties in the immediate vicinity. With the lack of landscaping on surrounding properties, this will enhance the look of the area and increase values. If the entire strip of Gulf to Bay is not in a scenic corridor, it should be. This is the entrance to our downtown and beaches. This development's proposed landscaping may be an incentive for surrounding parcels to upscale their landscaping and enhance the City. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i I , I;NGO c/ --------------------- ---------- ----------------- ? I - I I - k _ MIN 3 xn NO null ' I P ' ?? 111111 GROCERYSTORE E FIN- FL. 74.0 I I OI ? g ?? :? line r1!o b„ WI UnTnTrnTFFLFFFFFFFFFFFFFU Nil 11 T pp"Sf . °? ? S? A p 6 L?? A, >v GE?I )v RETAIL B' I9,ISO.sq.R. ((((((t ". ? P FIN. FL. 74.0 N _ III 1 I I -hlkilii In I I 1 E 1 ? ------------- ---------------------------------- 77- M 13 u i i V?YV?CY /d B1/YBYr1?_ k ' i E i t \ /f I xaz r;?tit5;. er r ' 1 _-_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1--_ a YGp. a = I _ a 1 = a - - a a a --------- -- = b - co. I b I S 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 i q b (Q/I 1 ^II3 ' 2; o wIC UI I I Illllldllllll ? r 1 1 1 1 Q ? b F nun Q O nail b r % A tiNl?l?A60 OHi+HHf0 ml IN Q _ A GROCERY STORE 54,300S.R FM. FL. 74.0 000 LR:N. TAIL B' 9,/50sq.A FL. 74.0 nnu 1 EX. EYE CL08(' - nro-I elsom I r 11 A 1 1 O'• 1 1 1 1 ? errE• k?? /?arE ram rIPCr?r rm?e 'O1E AN&A i PT,=230 (3 0 Cubic Yards) The PT-230 Compactor has been engineered and iuanufactured to provide many years of reliah..le service. The heavy-duty structural steel components are ivelded by A.WS certified technicians and water tested to ensure leak proof containment under high co.nvactign forces. 'This unit has total U.L. approval, standard 3'button controls, On/Off key switch, mushrooni stop, auto reverse and a SureJile Tn? door'seal, Specifications Eleck-icI E(ju pment Charge Box Capacity 1 Cu Yd Electrical Motor 208/230/460N, 3 Phase Container Capacity 30 Cu Yd Horse Power 10 Clear Top Opening (L x W) 31" x 50" Electrical Control Voltage 120 vAC Performance Characteristics l; lydraulic Equipment Cycle Time 29 sec Hydraulic Pump Capacity 10.5 gpm Total Normal Force 39,856 lbs Normal Pressure 2000 psi Total Maximum Force 52,611 lbs Maximum Pressure 2400 psi Normal Ram Face Pressure 40.0 psi Hydraulic Cylinder (2) Bore 4" Maximum Ram Face Pressure 52.9 psi Hydraulic Cylinder Rod 2.5" ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 '3 ,r PT,=230 SELF-CONTAINED COMPACTOR SPECIFICATIONS A. Manufactured. 1. To meet American National Standard Institute` specifications Z245.2-1997. 2. Total UL Approval on entire unit. 3. All welding done by AWS (American Welding Society) certified welders. B. Dimensional Information 1. Overall Height ................... 102" 2 Overall Width ............... 98" 3. Overall Length .................. . 253" 4. Compactor Deck Height..... 42" 5. Overall Weight......... 9,800.Lbs. C. Chargebox 1. Chargebox opening 30" Long x 50" Wide 2. Manufactures rating of 1 Cubic Yard Charge-box 3. NSWMA rating of 0.69 Cubic Yard Charge-box 4. Formed one piece chargebox eliminating nnis-fitted joints and providing a uniform fit. 5. Heavy Duty Gauge Steel Construction with steel channel reinforced sidewalls and floor for increased strength. More information in section on "Structure" D. Cylinders 1. (2) 4" diameter x 2 1/2" rod x 32" stroke industrial grade cylinder E. Power Unit 1. Standard 10 HP Motor supplied in tri-voltage, three-phase. 2. Controls mounted on 20' of Seal-rite. 3. Power Pack includes weather cover. 4. Colorized pressure gauge mounted on 20' of hydraulic hose. 5. Pump -10.5 GPM 7. Hydraulic pipes on both sides of compactor to allow disconnects to be located on either side. 8. Supplied with two 1/2" diameter x 13' long hydraulic hoses. 9. Controls include full light indicator. F. Performance Data 1. Normal Ram Force at full pressure ............ 39,850 lbs. 2. Maximum Ram Force at relief pressure ....... . 52,600 lbs ORIGINAL 3. Full Pressure ...................................... ..2000 psi RECEIVED 4. Relief Pressure ................................... ...2400 psi 5. Ram Face Dimensions .......................... ..50" x 20" JUL 212006 6. Ram Face Pressure at Full ...................... .. 40.0 psi PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7. Ram Face Pressure at relief .................... ...:52.9 psi CITY OF CLEARWATER 8 Ram Penetration ................................. ....... 6 in 9. Cycle Time ......................................... 29 seconds 10. Up to 124 cycles per hour 11. Up to 85 cubic yards capacity per hour 12. 30 cubic yard container. G. Compactor Structural Data 1. Breaker bar -1" x 6" x 8" angle 2. Side channel & rear vertical side support - 6[8.2 3. Top Reinforcements - 3[4.1 channel and Y4" x 3" x 4" angle ORIGINAL 4. Formed body -'/4" plate RECEIVED 5. Rear Plate -'/4" 'JUL 21 2006 6. Rear Cover - 10 GA 7. Cylinder mounts - Three 3/4" x 6" flat bars PL,NN'!?vk ; .r ,r i 8. Ram guides- 1" x 1" square bar t. 9. Top Cover - 12 GA H. Container Structural Data 1. Full weld inside and outside of all container and door sheets. 2. Concave door with full seal. Door is fabricated from a one piece sheet and tubular frame. - Must be single sheet 3. Standard with Universal Understructure. 4. Container Sides - 3/16" one piece bent plates. - Must be one piece per side. 5. Container Roof - Center Peaked 7 GA plate 6. Container Floor - 7 GA plate 7. Bulkhead - 3/16" plate 8. Container dump frame - 7 GA x 3" x 4" tube reinforced with 3/6" gusset plates 9. Door Plate - 3/16" 10. Door Frame - 3/16" x 3" x 6" tube 11. Door Hinge - 1" x 6" plate, 17/8" diameter tube, 1 1/4" diameter phi 12. Hook - 1 1/4" plate 13. Hook Mount - 1" Plate 14. Hook Mount Reinforcement - 3/4" x 4" flat bar 15. Bull Nose -1 1/2" plate 16. Bull Nose Roller - 4" diameter x 4" long solid steel - Grease fitting in axle shaft 17. Bull Nose Roller Mount - Bull Nose and 3/8" plate 18. Wheels - 8 ''/2" diameter x 4 '/2" long (compactor end) or 10" long (container end) 19. Wheel Mounts - 1/2" plate - Grease fitting in axle shaft 20. Main Rails -1/4" wall x 2" x 6" tube 21. Primary floor structure - 3[4.1 channel 22. Additional end structure -'/4" wall x 3" x 3" tube and 1/2" x 3" flat bar 23. Integrated rain shield to prevent rain run-off from entering container. - See drawing. 1. Doghouse 1. Constructed from 10 Gauge side and roof sheets. 2. Peaked roof to prevent rainwater from pooling. 3. Pre-cut hole for ventilator fan mounting 4. Doghouse lower rain shield consisting of a 10 gauge hopper shroud and overlapping 1/4" x 3" x3" doghouse angle. ! i 5. Upper rain shield constructed of 1/8" plate to prevent rain from entering container between doghouse and container bulkhead. 6. Doghouse is supported over the hopper by factory constructed "chute stand(s)" - see drawing. 7. Doghouse is factory mounted over the charge-box to ensure consistent and tight tolerances to the compactor hopper. The chute stands are attached and the chute field fabricated prior to cutting away the factory pre-set doghouse mounting tabs. J. Chute 1. Factory supplied material for chute- fabrication consists of 12 gauge sheet and 114" x 2" x 2" angle. 2. Chute is field fabricated to suit the individual site requirements. K. Guide Island 1. 10' standard guide island with end stop and "wheel capture plates" to prevent the compactor rolling away from end stop and provide positive location. 2. Main Guide Rail -'/z" x 3" x 5" angle cross braced with V4" x 2" x 2" angle 3. Stop Angle - %2" x 4" x 6" reinforced with 3/8" gusset plate and capped with '/4" x 3" x 3" end angle. 4. Wheel Capture Plate - 3/8" x 4" flat bar. 5. Anchored with fifteen (15) 1" diameter x 6" long concrete wedge anchors. ORIGINAL L. Warranty RECEIVED 1. Eighteen months on defective parts & labor warranty. -JUL 21 2??? 2. Three years on major components (Cylinder, Motor, Pump). 3. 430 Authorized service centers across the United States. PLANNING DEPARTMENT M. Service and Parts CITY OF CLEARWATER 1. Factory authorized parts and service organization with 1-800 24-hour 365 day a year customer service hotline. N. Finish 1. High quality industrial enamel paint from standard color chart. 0. Additional Items Shipped Loose 1. Safety and Operational Video 2. Hydraulic Hose Stand. 3. Penn Ventilator DX13R with mounting curb, removable screen, and ten self-tapping mounting screws. 4. Eight 3/8" diameter x 2 '/2: long anchors for mounting power unit and hose stand. These are in addition to the fifteen 1" diameter x 6" long anchors listed above for mounting the guide island. 5. Thru-the-Wall kit for passing electrical and hydraulic connections through the rough masonry opening. - Reference drawing. 6. One Gallon Pruner Paint 7. One Gallon Finish Paint. 8. Two chute stands with mounting anchors for supporting rear feed doghouse and field fabricated feed chute. One chute stand if side feed. 9. Material for fabrication of feed chute. 10. Tube of Silicone weather sealant. 11. Magnetic Access Interlock switch for security door. I'. Installation 1. Installation on requested delivery date. 2. Return trip for start-up and demonstration. ORIGINAL RECEIVED jUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PTR BALER 8c COMPACTOR O I O ? N a t i? I o z w ? w o I ca I o z w 4 ? I z w rx ui U w ? C) /? 1\ _1 > N ? ul C14 O t Q t I li N i! I (I L 1I f7- II I ? w II !I ? !L ? U IT I -i i W ? II ?I ? Q T rr C1 I! !I ORIGINAL - RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TITLE: PT-230 SELFCONTAINED COMPACTOR WALK UP SIDE FEED DWG. NO: AC401583 0 w z zr w O O N N M b ? N d 00 !5e 07/20/2006 12:23 CRRLEN #TY LLC 4 4468036 0 NO.335 1?02 44- Ld lm & Co., L 34 W. ORANGE STREET P. 0. Box 1879 TARPON SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34688-1879 TEL: (727) 938-0160 + FAX: (727) 938-0727 July 20, 2006 City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S, Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Gulf To Ray Plaza FLS2006-12098 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that if lease areas 1, & 2 become a restaurant, we as the applicant will revise and re-submit a traffic impact analysis and mitigate any impacts from tb.e expected trigs volurn.es generated from the site. Sincerely 1' ?, GF° Peter J. 'Ristoreelh, CFO ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER t s- ?anO? ( C3 !ao 1 f ?;PA? Tree Preservation Plan Gulf - to Bay Plaza General site notes: • All pruning and other arboricultural practices conducted on this site shall be performed by or under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and in accordance with applicable American National Standards Institute (ANSI) criteria for tree care operations as defined in ANSI A-300. • Tree barricades shall be constructed around protected trees being preserved prior to the commencement of construction or site clearing activities. Barricades shall be constructed using 2x4 lumber for upright posts installed 5' on center to a minimum depth of 12", with a height of at least 3' extending above grade. The upright posts shall be connected with plastic orange mesh equal. to the height of the 2x4 uprights and fastened securely to the upright posts. The barricades shall remain in place throughout the construction-process and should be inspected for compliance by City of Clearwater inspectors once installation is completed. The location of tree barricades will be delineated on the tree preservation plan. • Tree crown's that will be impacted by construction or that are located over proposed vehicular use areas will be raised to a minimum height of 14' above grade to facilitate construction equipment and future vehicular traffic. Pruning shall be completed prior to heavy equipment entering the site and will be delineated on the tree preservation plan. • Root pruning will be performed by a Vermeer or Doscocil root pruning machine to a depth of 12". Tree barricades will be installed in the root prune lines immediately after the root pruning is complete. The root prune trench shall be backfilled with the same soil removed during the root pruning operation and all debris shall be removed from the site. It will be necessary to consult with the Project Superintendent to determine the exact location of the root prune line. The area to be root pruned will be delineated on the tree preservation plan. • W.A.N.E. aeration units shall be installed per the manufacturer's specification in the areas designated on the tree preservation plan. Specific tree preservation measures: Tree ##1 - The grade will be raised approximately 1.5' within the portion of the critical root zone (CRZ = V radius for each 1" of trunk diameter measured 4.5' above grade) located in the proposed parking lot. In the CRZ area the existing sub-base RR1Ql n RECEIVED r „7 ^^n PLANNIIt\((, r CITY OF CLEAi<v,, eid • intact to preserve existing roots and new sub-base and asphalt will be added on top. W.A.N.E. aeration units will be installed to a depth of 24" per the manufacturers spacing to provide for the exchange of gases to the tree's root system. The fill will be retained by extended curbs or landscape timbers as delineated on the plan. The tree wi11. be barricaded per the specifications in the general site notes. Trees #2 - 8 will not be affected by proposed grade changes and their roots will not be impacted. The trees will be barricaded and pruned per the specification in the general site notes. Trees #9 - 11 - will be impacted by the construction of a water line and will be root pruned to a depth of 12" where delineated on the plan. The trees will be barricaded and pruned per the specification in the general site notes. Tree 912 - will be affected by a grade cut and will be root pi Lined to a depth of 12" where delineated on the plan. The root pruning, crown pruning and barricading will be performed per the specifications in the general site notes. ORIGINAL RECENED ", „"4 2 2006 Mkt r „?! m. wyJ'?p. v.4.t?^ 7 ? ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 21 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tree Inventory CITY OF CLEARWATER Gulf - to - Bay Plaza Clearwater, Florida Prepared by Alan Mayberry November 22, 2005 For: RMC Development LLC The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist, and includes findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and rimy report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of RMC Development LLC and will not be given to other entities unless so directed. Site Overview and Tree Canopy Analysis The subject site is commercial property located in Clearwater. The site consists of trees planted to meet landscape requirements that are growing in landscape islands within parking lots or in landscape buffers adjacent to parking lots. The tree canopy is comprised primarily of two native shade tree species: the live oak (Quercus virginiana) and the winged elm (N)nus alata). In addition, the site supports a quantity of the exotic crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) tree, and a few additional tree and palm species. The trees and palms in general are suffering from poor overall maintenance, insufficient irrigation and compacted soil conditions. The winged elms in particular have been adversely affected from improper pruning practices such as topping and rounding over, which have caused serious structural problems in these trees. Consequently, the majority of the elms have been downgraded and recommended for removal. A large percentage of the live oak trees also have structural issues and are recommended for removal. The opportunity for tree preservation at this-site is limited to a relatively small percentage of trees that are structurally sound and systemically healthy. The inventory identifies several trees that have minor structural problems but are otherwise healthy and could be preserved per the remedial measures defined in the comments section for the individual trees. Trees in this category should not be preserved if the remedial work will not be performed. As trees and people will closely interface on this site it is paramount that the site trees have good structure. A second problem facing the site trees is their locations relative to space issues such as growing in or around small landscape areas, adjacent structures, overhead utility wires, billboards etc. Tree preservation options are limited at this site and the best strategy may be to plant new trees with good structure and species characteristics and ensure that they have sufficient space and are maintained properly. Following this -overview is an explanation of the terms and codes used in the tree inventory and then the actual inventory, which will rate the individual trees. Please pay attention to the site notes within the inventory as they contain specific information 'to assist the development team with the site .design in regards to tree preservation. ORIGINAL 4. • RECEIVED JUL 21200& PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTE: This inventory will include an addendum that will breakdown the number of trees (converted to diameter inches) that have a condition rating of 3.0 or above (considered worthy of preservation and requiring mitigation) and the number of trees that have a condition rating of 2.5 or less and do not require mitigation. This information can be used in designing a landscape plan that meets the City's tree replacement requirements. Tree Inventory Data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the data used in the inventory: Tree# - location - Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size - Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.). Species - Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. Condition Rating - The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments, i.e., well spaced. vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included bark. Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) crown-density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing energy. The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system areas follows: x • ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212000 4- A dead tree PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category 41 ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). A tree with a rating of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2 = A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback, cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s) can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating. 3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5 - A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a 45 rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation. 6 - A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only ail i Kct-ti to JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree. Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree. NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3-5 years. However, events such as drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely affected, have the. tree inspected by a qualified International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist. Note: Whenever possible it is advised to adhere to inventory recommendations when selecting trees to be preserved. For example, trees rated 4.0 and higher should be preserved if at all possible, while trees rated 2.0 and lower should be removed unless otherwise noted in the,inventory. Trees rated 2.5 are generally recommended for removal unless remedial work is performed to upgrade them. Trees rated 3.0 and 3.5 are average trees that have good potential and warrant serious consideration for preservation but not to the extent that site plan modifications are necessary. This tree inventory was conducted on November 15 & 16, 2005. The weather was clear with good visibility. The leaves were beginning to fall on some of the winged elm trees consequently their systemic health was judged by inspection of the stems. The remainder of the species had not started leaf senescence. Per City of Clearwater requirements the tree inventory will provide specific information in the comments section as justification for each tree with an overall condition rating of 2.5 or below. In addition, trees rated 3.0 and higher may also have specific comments to assist the development team in their decision making process. Tree Inventory Tree # Size Species Rating 1 13" live oak (Quercus virginiafa) 3.0 2 16" live oak 3.0 3 16" live oak 2.0 Comments: This tree has very poor structure due to severe rounding over of the crown to maintain a view to the existing billboard located east of the tree. The live crown ratio and crown density are very good however, the structure is beyond repair. Recommend removal. NOTE: The crowns of trees #1-3 have been rounded over to maintain a view to the billboard located east of these trees. Rounding the crown of a tree requires annual pruning to remove new growth so that the tree is maintained at a designated height. This technique is an improper pruning technique and should not be performed on shade tree species. It is in fact prohibited by City of Clearwater code. In time it will ruin the structure of the tree and cause structural defects that may lead to failure. Tree #3 has been rounded so severe that the structure is beyond repair and it is recommended for removal. Trees # 1&2 are otherwise healthy with good live crown ratio and crown density. The structure has been affected by the rounding over but with proper pruning the structure could be restored. If the billboard is to remain these trees should be removed. If the billboard will be removed as part of the new development the trees should be preserved provided the new site layout will accommodate the trees. 4 10" live oak 2.5 Comments: The trunk of this tree forms a codominant stem 5' above grade where it forks to form the scaffold branches that support the crown. The crotch is slightly included and this condition will worsen annually. The crown has average form and live crown ratio. This tree could be preserved if cabling and bracing is performed on the crotch or if subordinate pruning is performed until a central leader is established, otherwise recommend removal. 13" live oak 2.5 Comments: The trunk of this tree forms a codominant stem with severely included bark. The crotch is bulging indicating internal fracture. The form and live crown ratio is very good but this tree can only be preserved if the crotch is cabled and braced, otherwise it should be removed. 6 6" winged elm (Ulmus alata) 15 Comments: This tree forms a codominant stem with included bark 7' above grade. The crown has the vase shape that is typical for the elm species. The live crown ratio is above average. The tree is downgraded due to poor overall structure. The majority of the site trees suffer from poor structure due to lack of proper pruning. Consequently, this tree is recommended for removal. 7 7" winged elm 2.5 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Comments: This tree forms a.codominant stem 7' above grade. The upper crownlTY OF CLEARWATER structure is below average due to improper pruning. The live crown ratio is above average. Recommend removal. 8 7" winged elm . 3.0 Comments: this tree has average structure and would improve with subordinate pruning. 9 5" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree forms three codominant stems 6' above grade that have included bark. The form and live crown ratio are above average but the tree is down graded and recommended for removal due to poor structure. 10 13" live oak 3.5 Comments: This tree has good overall structure and very good live crown ratio. There is a girdling root that is embedded at the ha.se but the tree has solved this problem. The overall form is good and the tree provides aesthetic benefits to the site. Recommend preservation. ' 11 8" live oak 12 17" live oak 3.0 2.5 Comments: This tree is systemically healthy and has a beautiful crown but has been downgraded due to structural problems. The tree forms codominant stems 4.5' above grade that are severally included and display the bulging at the crotch that indicates internal fracture. In addition, on the south side at the base beginning 6" above grade the tree has a wound that is 6" wide and 15" high. The tree is closing the wound but it will experience decay and strength loss. The tree has two rubbing branches in the upper crown and needs corrective pruning. Recommend removal. 13 9" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has an asymmetrical flattened trunk base on the east side indicating previous root loss. This tree is primarily downgraded due to the presence of two grafted scaffold branches and rubbing branches in the crown. The overall structure is below average. The live crown ratio and form are good. Recommend removal due to structural issues. 14 9" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree was missed during the tree survey but has been located on the inventory sheet. This tree has below average structure resulting from years of improper, pruning. The tree develops two codominant stems with included bark in the crotch 6' above grade. The upper crown structure is below average. The tree has surface roots growing towards the west that have been wounded to the extent that they will suffer significant decay. Recommend removal. NOTE: Trees #15, 16, 17, 18 & 24 are growing in a landscape buffer along Belcher Road where a rack of nine utility wires are located above the sidewalk. The wires start at 20' above grade and extend upwards and interfere with the growth of the branches on the west side of the canopies. The trees have been pruned in the past and will need to be pruned in the future to prevent interference with the wires. As these trees are located in a buffer and provide needed tree canopy along Belcher Road their preservation may be desirable in the new site design. They could be periodically pruned to accommodate the wires and while this pruning will develop a more one sided crown it will not affect the overall structural stability of the trees. However, if these trees will be removed as part of the new site design then accent trees that will not interfere with the overhead wires should be planted in the required perimeter buffer. 15 15" live oak 3.5 Comments: This tree is very healthy with a good form. However, a large rack of nine utility wires are located 12' to the west of this tree and extend to the south parallel with Belcher Road. The tree will have to be pruned in the future to accommodate the wires and consequently it will have a one sided crown. However, this will not affect its structure and it is worthy of preservation. 16 12" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree is a good tree that will also have to be pruned to accommodate the utility wires to the west but is recommended for preservation. 17 9" live oak 18 13" live oak 3.0 3.0 NOTE: The tree survey does not show the crape myrtle trees growing at this site. Crape myrtle trees are accent trees and are protected by City of Clearwater code if the collective diameter of the multiple stems exceeds 4" in diameter at 4.5' above grade. The size of the crape myrtle trees will be listed as 4" as approved by City staff. 19 4" crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) 4.0 20 4" crape myrtle 4.0 21 4" crape myrtle 4.0 ORIGINAL 22 4" crape myrtle 3.5 RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 23 4" crape myrtle 4.0 24 18" live oak 4.0 Comments: This tree is located 10' from the utility wires, 12' from a concrete pole. supporting the traffic lights and 2' from a pedestrian sidewalk adjacent to the center's entry drive. However, this tree has very good structure, high live crown ratio and has a beautiful appearance. The tree could be preserved but will require considerable pruning and creative design to incorporate it into the new site design. 25 5" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has poor form and has a codominant stem 9' above grade. It has suffered from improper pruning. Recommend removal. 26 7" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has poor structure in the form of several codominant stem formations in the lower and mid crown. Recommend removal. 27 4" crape myrtle 4.0 28 4" crape myrtle 4.0 29 4" crape myrtle 3.5 30 4" crape myrtle 4.0 31 4" crape myrtle 3.0 32 14" live oak 3.5 Comments: This tree has good structure, form and live crown ratio. The tree is located in a 21' wide landscape buffer adjacent to the south property line and as such may be able to be incorporated into the new site design. The tree is 5' from an existing side walk and may need periodic root pruning to avoid uplifting the walk way. In addition, proper pruning will enhance this tree's development. Recommend preservation. 33 18" live oak- 3.5 Comments: This tree has an attractive spreading crown and high live crown ratio. The structure is good but one of the scaffold branches on the east side is developing included bark in the crotch and may need cabling and bracing in the future. However, it is a good overall tree and warrants preservation. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL • , RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 34 7" live oak 2 5 CITY OF CLEARWATER Comments: This tree has been downgraded because two of the main scaffold branches that form the crown are developing included bark. The condition cannot be remedied by subordinate pruning and as the tree has mediocre form it is not recommended for cabling and bracing. This tree could be preserved but will need considerable maintenance in the future. Recommend removal unless there is a commitment to the maintenance. 35 17" live oak 3.5 Comments: This tree has a beautiful spreading form and very good live crown ratio. The tree has a large scaffold branch that goes toward the east that is developing included bark in the crotch and will likely need cabling and bracing in the future. However, this is a good overall tree and warrants the future maintenance. Recommend preservation. NOTE: Trees #36 - 39 were missed on the tree survey but have been located in the tree inventory. They are growing in a 3' landscape buffer located adjacent to the south property line and 2' from a curb that line a driveway next to the south side of the Publix building. The trees are also growing close to a fence that separates the adjacent multi- family residential property. The roots have a generous rooting area on the property to the south but are too close to the curb and are beginning to cause damage to the curb and pavement. They are for the most part good trees and could be preserved if the landscape buffer is widened in the new design. 36 17" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree has suffered two large wounds on lateral branches that overhang the driveway. The branches will need to be removed to accommodate vehicular traffic. NOTE: There is a very large live oak tree (50' height) located 6' south of the curb and 3' off the property line. The crown of this tree overhangs the entire driveway and almost touches the Publix building. The tree has a codominant trunk in the basal area that. is severely included. This condition is hidden by the fence but failure is common in basal codominant trunks on older mature trees.' This tree is a serious threat to cause property damage or personal injury if failure occurs. It is recommended that the adjacent property owner be contacted and this tree be stabilized through cable and bracing procedures. In addition, it should noted that as this tree's root system extends well into the subject property the tree's root system will have to protected per City of Clearwater code requirements if new development occurs in this area. 37 10" live oak 2.5 Comments: This tree is growing against a railroad tie that replaces the curb and has- caused minor damage to the pavement. This tree is downgraded due to a large wound located 10' above grade on a large scaffold branch going over the drive. The branch will continue to grow and be wounded by large trucks utilizing this area. If the branch is 0111. 0- removed it will disfigure the tree. The tree can solve the present wound if the wounding ceases. Therefore, the only way this tree should be preserved is if the landscape buffer is enlarged so vehicular traffic will no longer affect the tree, otherwise recommend removal. 38 18" live oak 2.5 Comments: This tree is also located near the railroad tie and has uplifted the pavement. The tree is downgraded due to poor structure. The tree forms three scaffold branches 7' above grade that are severely included. The crotches display the swellings that indicate internal fracture. The tree also has a wound on the trunk but the tree appears to have successfully compartmentalized the wound. The tree has a spreading trunk that lends high aesthetic value to the property and it is very healthy. However, this tree will need cabling and bracing to ensure structural stability, otherwise this tree should be removed. 39 19" live oak 2.5 Comments: This tree has also caused minor damage to the pavement. This tree has been downgraded because it forms a severely included codominant trunk 4.5' above grade. The crotch displays the swellings indicating internal fracture. The tree has good form, systemic health and good upper crown structure but will need cabling and bracing if it is to be preserved. NOTE: Trees #40-50 are located in a 10' landscape buffer along the east property line that separates the subject property from an adjacent mobile home park. Some of the trees have overhead utility wires running directly through their canopies (the lowest wire is about 15' above grade). They will be addressed individually in the inventory. However, collectively, if the overhead wires will remain in the new development it would be best to replace these trees with accent species. In addition, G.T.E. has recently flagged this area as having an underground cable present. It appears that some disturbance occurred around the base of tree 441. If there was open trenching near these trees it will severally affect their future health and structural stability. This determination should be made and the trees re-evaluated if the impact did occur. 40 17" live oak 4.0 Comments: This tree has very good structure, form and systemic health. Recommend preservation. 41 17" live oak 2.5 Comments: This tree forms four codominant scaffold branches 7' above grade with two of the branches being severally included. The tree has a trunk canker below the branches but the tree has solved it. The form is very attractive and the tree is systemically healthy. This is a very good tree with the exception of the structural problems. This tree warrants cabling and bracing to ensure structural stability, otherwise it should be removed. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • 42 15" live oak 3.5 43 15" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree has a slightly included codominant stem in the main crotch and may need cabling and bracing in the future. It also has a rubbing branch in the upper crown that needs removal. Recommend preservation. 44 11" live oak 2.5 Comments: The overhead power wires run directly through the crown of this tree and it has been pruned to accommodate them. In addition, two large lateral branches have been removed on the west side to accommodate trucks that use this area. The tree is essentially one-sided to the east. Recommend removal of this tree unless the power wires will be removed as part of the new development. 45 10" live oak 2.5 Comments: The form and structure of this tree are average. It has been downgraded because the utility wires are running directly through the crown. If the wires will be relocated this tree could be pruned into a good tree and would warrant preservation. 46 14" laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) 2.0 Comments: This tree has very poor structure in the trunk and lower canopy. It has been pruned hard because of the utility wires and has long branch stubs, sucker growth and dieback in the canopy. Recommend removal. 47 14" live oak 2.5 Comments: This tree forms two codominant trunks with severally included bark 4' above grade. The crotch is exhibiting swellings that indicate internal fracture. The crown has been over-pruned due to the wires. The form and live crown ratio are average. Recommend removal. 48 14" live oak 2.0 Comments: This tree has very poor structure as it forms a codominant trunk with severally included bark 4.5' above grade. The upper crown also exhibits codominant stems. The crown has been pruned hard due to the overhead wires. Recommend removal. 49 14" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree has good structure and live crown ratio but is suffering from the presence of the wires which are located low in the crotch of this tree. This tree should be removed unless the wires are being relocated. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL • RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 50 12" live oak 3.0 CITY OF CLEARWATER Comments: This tree has average structure and good live crown ratio but will also have to be removed unless the wires are relocated. 51 12' C.T. Chinese fan palm. (Livistona chinensis) 3.0 52 20' C.T. sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 4.0 NOTE: The tree survey shows another palm at this location however, it is not included in this inventory as it has less than 10' of clear trunk and is not protected by City code. 53 5" winged elm 54 8" winged elm 3.0 2.5 Comments: This tree has a severally included codominant trunk 3.5' above grade. The crotch has been included for several years and shows signs of internal fracture. Recommend removal. 55 5" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has very good live crown ratio and form. However, the tree has poor structure as it has several codominant stems in the lower and mid crown. This tree's overall condition rating would be upgraded to a 3.0 if structural pruning was performed. 56 6" winged elm 57 9" winged elm 3.0 2.5 Comments: This tree has a tight v-shaped codominant trunk 4.5' above grade. The tree produces two more codominant scaffold branches in the mid crown. The tree also has surface roots that have been scarred by lawnmowers. The form and live crown ratio are very good but the tree has been downgraded due to poor form. Recommend removal. 58 9" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This trunk of this tree has a severally included fork 3' above grade. The two codominant trunks fork to form additional codominant stems. Recommend removal due to poor structure. NOTE: Trees #59-61 are live oak trees and are located in a 6' wide landscape . buffer adjacent to Gulf - to -Bay Boulevard. The trees are situated 3' from the sidewalk of Gulf -to - Bay and are growing beneath a utility wire that is approximately 13' above grade. The live oak tree reaches massive proportions and will ultimately damage the sidewalk, curb and street with its root system. These trees should be removed and replaced with accent tree species unless the new development will have a buffer of at least 20' in width that will accommodate a large shade tree species. In addition, the single utility wire would need to be relocated. 59 10" live oak 60 13" live oak 3.0 2.5 Comments: This tree is downgraded due to a codominant trunk with included bark 4' above grade. The crotch is displaying the swelling that indicates internal fracture at the inclusion. The utility wire is rubbing a branch in the crown and the canopy will need to be pruned hard to accommodate the wire. This young tree has also started to crack the sidewalk. The crown is attractive and the tree is systemically healthy however, it is recommended for removal. 61 11" live oak 3.0 62 11" winged elm 3.5 Comments: This tree was missed in the tree survey but has been added. It is a healthy tree with good structure. Recommend preservation. 63 9" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree develops three codominant scaffold branches 5' above grade however, the tree has a central leader and the codominant situation could be easily corrected through subordinate pruning. The live crown ratio, systemic health and form are good. Recommend preservation if the subordinate pruning will be performed. 64 5" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has below average form, structure and live crown ratio. Recommend removal. 65 5" winged elm 2.0 Comments: This tree forms a codominant trunk 3', above grade that is beginning to become included in the crotch. The form and live crown ratio are below average. Recommend removal. 66 6" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has poor structure and form as it has been pruned too hard. Recommend removal. 67 7" winged elm 2.0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Comments: This tree has a codominant trunk 5' above grade and produces additional codominant stems in the upper crown. The tree has been improperly pruned and has poor structure. Recommend removal. 68 7" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree forms a codominant trunk 3' above grade. There is a large wound in the basal area starting 6" above grade and extending up the trunk for 8". The wound will result in basal decay. The upper crown is producing codominant branches. Recommend removal. 69 6" winged elm 3.0 70 12" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree forms a codominant trunk with a severally included crotch 5' above grade. The crotch is displaying signs of internal fracture. The upper crown is also producing codominant stems. Recommend removal. 71 4" winged elm 2.0 Comments: This tree has poor structure, form and live crown ratio. Recommend removal. 72 7" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has a codominant stem 8' above grade that is just beginning to become included. The form and live crown ratio are good. The overall condition of this tree will improve if the tree is cabled and braced however; it would be more cost effective to replace it with a new central leader tree. Recommend removal. 73 7" winged elm 3.0 74 6" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has codominant stems in the lower and middle crown and has two rubbing branches. Recommend removal due to poor structure. 75 6" winged elm 76 20' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 4.5 Comments: A beautiful and healthy palm, recommend preservation or relocation. 77 18' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Comments: See comments for tree#76. 78 25' C.T. sabal palm 2.5 Comments. This palm produces a pronounced inverted trunk restriction approximately 18' above grade. This could be an area for future failure, recommend removal. 79 18' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 80' 4" crape myrtle 3.0 .81 4" crape myrtle 3.0 .82 4" crape myrtle 4.0 83 20' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 84 20' C.T. sabal palm 2.5 Comments: This palm has an inverted trunk restriction 18' above grade that could lead to future Failure. Recommend removal. 85 4" crape myrtle 3.5 86 4" crape myrtle 4.0 87 4" crape myrtle 4.0 88 22' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 89 4" crape myrtle 3.5 90 7" winged elm 2.0 Comments: This tree is partially uplifted as the root collar is mounded up and the tree has a pronounced lean to the south. The tree also has poor structure as it produces a codominant trunk 4' above grade. The form and live crown ratio are below average. Recommend removal. 91 4" winged elm 2.0 Comments: This tree has a codominant trunk 4' above grade, a girdling root at the base, low live crown ratio and poor overall form. Recommend removal. ORIGINAL 92 6" winged elm 3.0 RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0.. 93 8" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree forms a codominant trunk 4.5' above grade and a second codominant trunk 5.0' above grade. Both attachments have included bark present in the crotch. The tree forms additional codominant branches in the mid crown area. The form and live crown ratio are average. Recommend removal. 94 7" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has minor damage to the root collar from lawnmowers. It also has an embedded girdling root. The structure is poor due to several tight crotches and codominant stems. Recommend removal. 95 6' winged elm 2.0 Comments: This tree is leaning and is partially uprooted. It has a basal wound on the northwest side that extends 3' up the trunk. The form and structure are below average. Recommend removal. 96 8" winged elm 3.5 97 6" winged elm 3.0 98 7" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has large surface roots that have wounds that will result in decay. The trunk is asymmetrical on the east side indicating root loss. The tree has two scaffold branches that have included bark in the crotch. Recommend removal. 99 6" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree forms a codominant trunk 4.5' above grade that is just becoming included in the crotch. The form and structure are below average, recommend removal. 100 7' winged elm 2.0 Comments: This tree has been previously topped and the structure severally damaged. Recommend removal. 101 8" winged elm 3.0 102 9" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree was previously topped and has formed epicormic branches which are weakly attached. The form and live crown ratio are good but the tree is downgraded ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 21 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER due to poor overall structure. This tree could be preserved if crown restoration pruning is performed otherwise recommend removal. 103 7' winged elm 3.0 104 4" crape myrtle 4.0 105 4' crape myrtle 4.0 106 6' winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree forks into a codominant trunk 8' above grade with a crotch that is becoming included. The upper crown has two rubbing branches, below average form and has been over-pruned. Recommend removal. 107 5" winged elm 3.0 108 7" winged elm 3.0 109 5" winged elm 3.0 110 6" winged elm 2.0 Comments: This tree has a severally included codominant trunk 3' above grade. The crown is anemic and the overall form is poor. Recommend removal. 111 5" winged elm 3.0 112 5" winged elm 3.0 113 7" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has a severally included codominant trunk at 3' above grade.. The crotch is displaying the swellings indicating internal fracture. The crown and live crown ratio are average, but the structure is poor. Recommend removal. 114 8" winged elm 3.0 115 10" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree has very poor form as it develops a severally included codominant trunk 3' above grade. It is already showing signs of internal fracture. The upper crown also has several codominant stems. Recommend removal. 116 6" winged elm 3.0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 117 7" winged elm 2.0 Comments: This tree forms a codominant trunk 18" above grade and indicates internal fracture. The upper crown structure is below average. Recommend removal. 118 9" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree develops four scaffold branches emanating from the same area on the trunk. Two of the codominant branches are included and there is a wire embedded in one of the crotches. The tree has been topped previously and the overall structure is very poor. Recommend removal. 119 7" winged elm 2.0 Comments: This tree forms a severally included codominant trunk 3' above grade. 5.5' above grade the tree develops three more codominant stems. This tree has suffered from poor pruning in the form of flush cuts and stub cuts. The form and live crown ratio are below average. Recommend removal. 120 9" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree develops a severally included codominant trunk 4.5' above grade. The crotch is displaying the swellings on each end that indicate internal fracture. The tree is leaning and is slightly mounded at the root collar. The eastern trunk forks into two codominant branches that have included bark. The crown has good form and high live crown ratio but the tree is recommended for removal due to poor structure. 121 7" winged elm 3.0 NOTE: Trees # 122-134 are part of an annexed property and as such reflect different maintenance patterns. The pruning performed on these trees exhibit a higher standard of professional treecare. 122 12' C.T. queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 3.0 Comments: This palm is systemically healthy but may not warrant preservation due to scarring on the trunk. 123' 20' C.T. queen palm 2.0 Comments: This palm develops a trunk restriction 14' above grade. In addition, the bark has sloughed off from most of the trunk in the first 7' of the trunk and has diminished any aesthetic value. Recommend removal. ORIGINAL 124 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 1• / 125 26" live oak 4.0 Comments: This tree has very good structure in the trunk and throughout the crown and has very good systemic health as indicated by vigorous shoot growth at the branch tips. The live crown ratio is only average due to extensive pruning to accommodate this tree to vehicular traffic and the former mobile homes. The pruning reflects proper cuts and professional maintenance. This tree is very worthy of preservation. Allow as much undisturbed rooting area as possible, preferably equal to the tree's dripline (outermost branch spread). 126 36" live oak 4.5 Comments: This tree has exceptional structure and systemic health. The trunk forms two large scaffold branches 7' above grade but the crotch is u-shaped with connective tissue present. A large branch was removed 8' above grade but it was a correct collar cut and the tree will compartmentalize the wound. The live crown ratio is high and the tree is showing vigorous growth at the tips, mostly likely due to the extensive rooting area available. The form is good and this tree lends high aesthetic value to the property. This tree should be preserved if at all possible. If preserved, allow as much undisturbed rooting area as possible, preferably equal to the tree's dripline. 127 35' C.T. Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 4.5 Comments: Recommend preservation in place or relocation on site. 128 23" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree is located on or within a foot of the east property line. The tree has a large wire running through the center of the crown and it appears to be lying on a lateral branch. The branch that it is laying on grows to the southeast and onto the roof and wall of an adjacent building. This entire large branch could be removed and it would solve the wire problem and the interference with the building. A second solution would be to relocate the wire or place a wrap on the wire to protect both the wire and the branch. This tree is border line as to whether it should be preserved. The crown is irregular due to the pruning to accommodate the wire. The structure is below average but the live crown ratio is very good. However, as it is growing on the property line it likely will end up in a landscape buffer. This tree could be incorporated into the site design; however it will need maintenance to solve the wire issue. NOTE: The tree survey shows a palm south of tree #128, but it has less than 10' of clear trunk and is not protected by city code. 129 32" live oak 3.0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER v r Comment: This tree forks into three trunks 4' above grade. Both crotches are included and displaying early signs of internal fracture as there is slight swelling on the outside of the crotch. This is the type of codominant attachment that can lead to failure in live oak trees. The live crown ratio and the upper crown structure are good. The form is beautiful as the tree has a wide-spreading picturesque crown. This tree is young and healthy and could evolve into a signature landscape centerpiece if maintained properly. If preserved this tree should be cabled and braced to ensure structural stability. It is warranted given the aesthetic amenities that this tree will impart to the site. 130 24" Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 0.0 Comments: This tree is a noxious exotic species that is on the category one list of the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council list. It is against the law in the City of Clearwater to plant this tree and state law requires its removal in new developments. Removal is mandatory. Note: The site plan shows a palm tree existing to the west of tree #130 but it has less than 10' of clear trunk and is not protected by city code. 131 11" laurel oak 3.0 Comments: This tree is an exceptional tree except for a codominant leader 10' above ORIGINAL grade. This codominant could easily be corrected through subordinate pruning. RECEIVED Recommend preservation. JUL 21 2006 132 5" golden rain (Koelreuteria paniculata) 2.0 Comments: This tree has a sparse crown and the scaffold branch on the north side is dead. Recommend removal. 133 38" laurel oak 3.0 PLANNING DEPARrMEN1 CITY OF CLEARWATER Comments: This tree appears to be a hybrid laurel/water oak. It is a mature tree with an" attractive form as it displays a large rounded symmetrical canopy. The live crown ratio and overall structure are slightly above average. The tree has several large scaffold branches emanating from the same general area of the trunk but they do not appear to be in jeopardy of failing. The tree has an open cavity on the west side of the trunk 6' above grade that is 1' high by 10" wide. It is not causing serious structural problems. On the north side at the base there is a cavity that extends into the tree about 2'. This type of cavity is a concern. The decay is not serious now, but it is progressive and will undermine the tree's stability in the future. The tree also has some trunk cankers but they are not serious. The systemic health is average. The tip growth is minimal and the canopy slightly thinning which in indicative of the onset of old age. This tree is ready to begin the mortality spiral common to water or laurel oak trees of this age. They typically reach an age of about 65 years in urban areas. In its current condition it is worthy of preservation. However,. this tree as noted is entering an irreversible health decline stage Vu s of its life which will be accelerated by any impact from the proposed development. And as its root system covers such a vast area, impacts are inevitable. Consequently, this tree is not recommended for preservation. The site would be better served to preserve the higher rated live oak trees which can live up to 300 years and are more able to withstand construction impacts. 134. 31" live oak . 2.5 Comments: This tree is downgraded due to very poor structure. The trunk has a codominant beginning at P above grade that is included for 3'. The crotch is displaying the swelling around the crotch that indicates internal fracture. This type of basal codominant is prone to fail when the tree becomes large however; it could be stabilized with cabling and bracing procedures. The upper crown structure, form and live crown ratio is very good. If secured by cabling and bracing this tree could evolve into a beautiful tree, otherwise removal is recommended due to poor structure. 135 19" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree has a utility pole 7' west of the trunk and a rack of wires are running north and south and east through the crown of this tree. The crown has been pruned considerably due to the presence of the wires and will have to be pruned in the future if the wires stay. The structure and systemic health are good. The form has suffered due to the pruning and the crown is somewhat irregular. If the wires will be relocated as part of the new development then this tree could be preserved and it will evolve.into a good tree with proper pruning. If the wires will stay removal is recommended. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 21 1006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARbV,ATER e , v, A Tree Mitigation - Gulf -to - Bay Plaza The following is an addendum to the tree inventory for.Gulf - to -Bay Plaza. Per City of Clearwater policy, all protected trees and palms with an overall condition rating of 3.0 or greater are required to be preserved or mitigated. Mitigation can be accomplished through, planting replacement trees on site that meet the requirements of the City's landscape code or paying funds into the City's Tree Bank at $48.00 per diameter inch when replanting is not possible. Mitigation can be a combination of replacement trees and paying into the tree bank. In addition, the City may reduce mitigation if specific tree preservation measures are implemented on site. The City's representative will determine the mitigation once the final site plan is completed and the quantity of trees to be removed and preserved is determined. There are three classifications used to determine tree mitigation at this site: 1) Mitigation for protected trees is based on trunk diameter measurement. Trunk diameter is determined by measuring the trunk at 4.5' above grade. If the tree forks at that point the measurement is taken at the narrowest area of the trunk below the fork. If the tree has basal codominant trunks, each trunk is measured at 4.5' above grade and added together. 2) Crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) trees are multi-stemmed accent trees and are counted as 4" in diameter each. (Their actual diameter is approximately 12"). 3) The palms are not measured by trunk diameter but by feet of clear trunk. Each palm with an overall condition rating of 3.0 or greater is equal to 1" diameter. Tree removal data for Gulf-to-Bay Plaza Total number of protected trees and palms on site: 135 ORIGINAL RECEIVED Total number of protected shade trees on site: 103 Total number of shade trees rated 3.0 or greater: 48 JUL 212006 Total diameter inches of shade trees rated 3.0 or greater: 582 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Total number of crape myrtle trees on site: 19 CITY OF CLEARWATER Total number of crape myrtle trees rated 3.0 or greater: 19 Total diameter inches of crape myrtle trees rated 3.0 or greater: 76 Total number of protected palms on site: 13 Total number of palms rated 3.0 or greater: 14 (converted to 10 diameter inches) Total number of diameter inches of shade trees, crape myrtle trees and palms on site with an overall condition rating of 3.0 or greater: 668 Final mitigation will be determined by the number of trees and palms preserved in the new development and the quantity and size of trees proposed for planting on the final landscape plan. 9 0 STORMWATER REPORT FOR: GULF TO BAY PLAZA Ram A. Goel, PIF k l'E.7 1 a ?y 0 ° . II °°°?•?•?•''O6 RR * sell July 20 Project No. 0570 DRAINAGE NARRATIVE Site Summary The project is located in section 18, township 29 and range 16 in the City of Clearwater. The contiguous owned property is 460,412 sf and consists of the construction of retail sales stores and associated parking and road infrastructure, storm management system and utilities and results in the following: • Removal of 226,080 S.F. of impervious vehicular use area and 79,522 S.F. building and sidewalk. Construction of 223,992 S.F. of impervious vehicular use area and 103,384 S.F. of new building and sidewalk. • This will yield a 2,088 S.F. DECREASE of impervious vehicular use area and overall there will be a 21,774 S.F. INCREASE in total impervious area. Desiqn Criteria Discharge is into the City of Clearwater's storm system and the design criterion is the more stringent of the City of Clearwater's and SWFWMD storm requirements. The more stringent requirement results in a minimum pond volume based on SWFWMD's requirements. In addition, development of lease areas 1 and 2 will be included in the required pond volume so that these lots will not require additional stormwater ponds. 6" of freeboard is provided between the highest design stage and top of pond. Water Quality Treatment The seasonal high water elevation was found to be 3' below the ground surface. In the area of the pond this is an average elevation of about 70.0. Because of this relatively high seasonal water elevation and to minimizing fill over the site a liner is being used to achieve the required pond volume. This volume is achieved through two ponds connected via an equalizer pipe. The volume of fill from the bottom of the ponds to 8.4" above the liner elevation of 64.20 will be drained by 250 I.f. of 6" underdrain set at an invert elevation of 64.9 that discharges into a roadside inlet along Gulf to Bay. 1/2" water quality treatment over the total drainage area yielding a total requirement volume of 19,184 cf is provided in the detention pond which has a volume capacity of 19,397 cf between elevations 67.5 and 69.15. This water quality volume is filtered through the underdrain system within 24 hours of the end of the rainfall event. Water Quantity Attenuation Water quantity attenuation was provided so that the pre-development peak discharge rate based on the maximum historical impervious was not exceeded by the built-out (assuming an average percentage of impervious on lease areas 1 and 2) post- development peak discharge rate for the 25 year storm. SWFWMD's requirement using the SCS method results in a larger storage volume requirement. A detailed derivation • • of the basin information used in the ICPR analysis can be found in the attached TR-55 worksheets 2 and 3 and the results of the analysis are summarized in the table below: Storm Event Summa Design Storm Post-Development Pond Stage elevation feet Peak Discharge (cfs) Pre Post SWFWMD 25 yr/24hr post not to exceed 25yr/24 pre 71.97 39.19 36.37 Table 1 The design storm discharge is across a 2 - 15.84" wide weir set at an elevation of 69.15 and a 37" x 49" grate set at elevation 71.15. Storms greater than the design storm are also discharged through the top of grate elevation of 71.15 of the control structure with an invert of 66.9, into 480' long 30" RCP which ties into a roadside inlet on Belcher Road. • NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS PROJECT: GULF TO BAY PLAZA PROJECT NO.: 0570 VOLUME PROVIDED = BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. _ BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. _ UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. _ K= LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 19,397 C.F. 69.15 67.50 64.90 0.09 FT/MIN 250 FT 6 INCH n U POND AREA (SF) = 14,575 S.F. POND AREA (SF) = 8,937 S.F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HG FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 69.15 14,575 3.79 0.41 2.75 1.38 393 48.73 5,721 117 68.74 13,165 3.38 0.41 2.75 1.23 393 43.43 5,140 118 68.33 11,756, 2.97 0.41 2.75 1.08 393 38.13 4,559 120 67.91 10,346 2.56 0.41 2.75 0.93 393 32.84 3,977 121 67.50 8,937 TIME = 476 MINUTES TIME = 7.9 HOURS 0 Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff Project /? b ?o - 6ULF TC) AA ?-A By Date 0 4 t7 Location Checked Date Check one: 56lPresent ? Developed t Y. J??U lr; 9 k • 9 s $ '? ' a w ?' } }, .. c.,.:.ik[?..r ?? 1. .Y.... _ . ....,... - - .... _z. --:_ -.. .- . = Soil name Cover description .. . ?.. . .? CN 'J Area Product and hydrologic of CN x area group (cover type, treatment, and hydrologic condition; percent N N N w _ _ acres ? mil (appendix A) impervious; unconnected/connected impervious area ratio) LL a-- go ED J Use only one CN source per line Totals •,??'? CN,(weighted) = total product Use CN» total area d MAN ? Storm #1 Storm #2 Storm #3 Frequency ................................................. yr Rainfall, P (24-hour) .................................. in Runoff, Q .................................................. in (Use P and CN with table 2-1, figure 2-1, or equations 2-3 and 2.4) D-2 (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) L Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff 01 • Project V By Date L ation 6 - ? hecked Date U LAG + r Ooq r? Check one: ? Present /Developed a Soil name Cover description CN 'v Area Product and hydrologic of CN x area group (cover type, treatment, and hydrologic condition; percent N N N a lacres ? mi2 (appendix A) impervious; unconnected/connected im pervious area ratio) M qo AsTA,,TuL-A ?P ;E W?1 ?Mo ? O ItAv u-.U u5 9 •49.. Use only one CN source per line Totals» to q5444 CN,(weighted) . total product ?a 44 Use C N total area Storm #1 Storm #2 Storm #3 Frequency ................................................. yr Rainfall, P (24-hour) .................................. in Runoff, Q .................................................. in (Use P and CN with table 2-1, figure 2-1, or equations 2-3 and 2-4) D-2 (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) t • • Worksheet 3: Time of Concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date OV 'UTHEPIS-T CV2? 6uvF toy Check one. ?6 Present ? Developed Check one: WTc ? Tt through subarea Notes: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) ................................... 2. Manning's roughness coefficient, n (table 3-1) .......... 3. Flow length, L (total L t 300 ft) ................................. ft 4. Two-year 24-hour rainfall, P2 .................................. in 5. Land slope, s ........................................................ ft/ft 6. Tt = 0.007 (nL) 0.8 ,F Compute Tt ......... hr + P2 0.5 50.4 `-°.'7 •Q 11 C I Segment ID 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) ..................... 8. Flow length, L ...........................................................ft 9. Watercourse slope, s ............................................ ft/ft 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ............................. fUs 11. Tt = L Compute Tt ........... hr 3600 V Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ................................. ft2 13. Wetted perimeter, pw .............................................. ft a 14. Hydraulic radius, r= - Compute r ......................... ft 15 Channel slope, s ......pW ........................................... ft/ft 16. Manning's roughness coefficient, n ............................ 17. V = 1.49 r 2/3 s 1/2 Compute V ................ ft/s n 18. Ftowtength, L .......................................................... ft 19. Tt = L Compute Tt .............. hr 3600 V 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, ar V d 19) ......................................................-a-fr (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) DA Worksheet 3: Time of Concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date 6570 -GULF 7b Aq ?UnA 01& ...,,;,,,, _ r Checked Date Check one: El Present 0 Developed Check one: u Tc ? Tt through subarea Notes: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. r Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) ................................... 2. Manning's roughness coefficient, n (table 3-1) .......... 3. Flow length, L (total L t 300 ft) ................................. ft 4. Two-year 24-hour rainfall, P2 .................................. in 5. Land slope, s ......................................................... ft/ft 0-8 ompute Tt .. hr -I ii- 6. Tt = 0.007 (nL) ?,0?? 0l ( K ibG ?' _ 155 x P2 0.5 so.a O Segment ID 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) ..................... 8. Flow length, L ...........................................................ft 9. Watercourse slope, s ............................................ ft/ft 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ............................. ft/s 11. Tt = L Compute Tt ........... hr 3600 V f• d ? . Q,?jO + Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ................................. ft 2 13. Wetted perimeter, pw .............................................. ft 14. Hydraulic radius, r= a Compute r ......................... ft 15 Channel slope, s ..... pW ........................................... ft/ft 16. Manning's roughness coefficient, n ............................ 17. V = 1.49 r 2/3 s 1/2 Compute V ................ft/s n 18. FbvOength, L ........................................... ........ ft 19. Tt = L Compute Tt ............... hr 3600 V 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, at Zs D,l5 + = 11 td 19) ...................................................... (6 i ,l (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) 0570 - Gulf to Bay Publix 05/25/06 ICPR Nodal Diagram Nodes A Stage/Area V Stage/Volume T Time/Stage M Manhole Basins O Overland Flow U SCS Unit Hydro S Santa Barbara Links P Pipe W Weir C Channel D Drop Structure B Bridge R Rating Curve H Breach A:Pond2 P:EQUALIZER L D:Outfall T:Pre-Dev U:Pre-Dev A:Pondl U:Post-Dev • IT :Post-Dev Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. 0570 - Gulf to Bay Publix 05/25/06 ICPR Input ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Basins ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Post-Dev Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Area(ac): 10.570 Curve Number: 90.30 DCIA(%): 0.00 Node: Pondl Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Pre-Dev Node: Pre-Dev Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Area(ac): 8.030 Curve Number: 84.80 DCIA(%): 0.00 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nodes Name: Pondl Group: BASE Type: Stage/Area Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 67.500 Warn Stage(ft): 72.000 • • Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 67.500 0.1936 72.000 0.4643 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Pond2 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 67.500 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 72.000 Type: Stage/Area Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 4 0570 - Gulf to Bay Publix 05/25/06 ICPR Input Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 67.500 0.0116 72.000 0.0880 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Post-Dev Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 68.160 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 72.000 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 68.160 999.00 68.160 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Pre-Dev Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 68.160 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 72.000 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 68.160 999.00 68.160 Pipes --------------- --------------- ------------ ------------ --------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- -------------- -------------- Name: EQUALIZER From Node: Pond2 Length(ft): 95.00 Group: BASE To Node: Pondl Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 24.00 24.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.00 Rise(in): 24.00 24.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Invert(ft): 67.500 67.500 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: • Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 4 0570 - Gulf to Bay Publix 05/25/06 ICPR Input Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Drop Structures ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Outfall Group: BASE UPSTREAM Geometry: Circular Span(in): 30.00 Rise(in): 30.00 Invert(ft): 66.900 Manning's N: 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 From Node: Pondl To Node: Post-Dev DOWNSTREAM Circular 30.00 30.00 65.750 0.013000 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall *** Weir 1 of 2 for Drop Structure Outfall *** Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 31.68 Rise(in): 23.40 *** Weir 2 of 2 for Drop Structure Outfall *** Count: 1 Type: Horizontal Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 37.00 Rise(in): 49.00 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Invert(ft): 69.200 Control Elev(ft): 69.200 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Invert(ft): 71.150 Control Elev(ft): 71.150 Length(ft): 480.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Solution Incs: 10 TABLE TABLE 0 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 4 0570 - Gulf to Bay Publix 05/25/06 ICPR Input ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hydrology Simulations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 025 Filename: X:\2005 AutoCAD Projects\0570 - (Gulf-to-Bay Publix)\Drainage\025.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) ------- ---------- 30.000 5.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Routing Simulations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 025 Hydrology Sim: 025 Filename: X:\2005 AutoCAD Projects\0570 - (Gulf-to-Bay Publix)\Drainage\025.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Boundary Stages: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 50.000 15.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes Patch: No Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 End Time(hrs): 30.00 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Flows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Boundary Conditions ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ • 10 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 4 of 4 0570 - Gulf to Bay Publix 05/25/06 Max Pre-Development Condition Simulation Basin Group Time Max Flow Max Volume Volume hrs Cfs in ft3 025 Pre-Dev BASE 12.04 39.193 7.155208547.675 E Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 0570 - Gulf to Bay Publix 05/25/06 Max Post-Development Condition Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs Cfs hrs Cfs Pondl BASE 025 12.31 71.971 72.000 0.0050 20153 12.08 49.611 12.31 36.370 Pond2 BASE 025 12.30 71.970 72.000 -0.0050 3816 0.00 0.000 12.67 2.165 0 0 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 0570 - GULF TO BAY PLAZA Pond Liner Buoyancy Calculations FORMULA COLUMN A Wet Sand Weight = 120 Ibs/cf B Dry Sand Weight = 110 Ibs/cf C Water Weight = 62.4 Ibs/cf DENSITY OF COMPACTED WET SAND - NOT DRAINED BY UNDERDRAIN DENSITY OF COMPACTED DRY SAND - DRAINED BY UNDERDRAIN D Seasonal High Elevation = 70.00 ft FROM UES GEOTECHNICAL REPORT JAN. 5, 2006 E Underdrain Invert Elevation = 64.00 ft NGVD INVERT EL. OF 6" UNDERDRAIN F Pond Bottom Area = 8,432 sf AREA OF POND AT NGVD ELEVATION OF 67.5 G Pond Bottom Elevation = 67.50 ft BOTTOM ELEVATION OF POND AT WHICH STORAGE CAPACITY IS CALCULATED H Liner Invert Elevation= 64.20 ft NGVD ELEVATION OF TOP OF 30 MIL LINER Up Pressure = 3,051,709 Ibs EQUAL TO (D-H)xCxF Down Pressure = 3,119,840 Ibs EQUAL TO (G-E)xBxF+(E-H)xAxF This number must be greater than 1.00 ---> 1.0223 for the design to be acceptable. NOTES: 1). SAND USED FOR BALLAST TO KEEP LINER FROM FLOATING TAKEN TO BE DRY TO THE INVERT OF THE UNDERDRAIN, WET BELOW THE U.D. 2). UNDERDRAIN MUST BE CLEANED OF OBSTRUCTIONS THAT WILL PREVENT FLOW. 3). LINER MUST BE BUILT TO GO NO FURTHER OUT THAN THE EDGE OF THE BOTTOM OF POND AND MUST GO STRAIGHT DOWN TO THE INVERT. CITY OF CLEARWATER Public Works Administration - Engineering Department FORM NUMBER .100 South Myrtle Avenue, Room 220 1311-0104 P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Ph.: 727 562-4750 Fax: 727 562-4755 VACATION REQUEST FILING FORM Nnte: responses to Items 1- 9 are required. 1. NAME OF APPLICANT OR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: -???'i? ` Name Phone: '5 -5 Address:/Of L'6-df ?,?r? ?? ''?,3L7. ??f,4/1?Z?f.C. .?C .33 J HEREBY PETITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR THE VACATION OF THE FOLLOWING: I? EASEMENT TYPEV?& Z/- i/ t/ ? STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ? ALLEY ? OTHER: 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE VACATED: 3. STREET ADDRESS OR SIMPLE LOCATION: 4. PROPOSED USE O VACATED PROPERTY: 5. ZONING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY: North: 6iq-1X ®f South: 11J4 East: A, 6I1 -P0 West: /Z?1,4 g, Printed on recycled paper Page 1 ORIGINAL Revised 6/24/2005 RFCEIVED APR ' 12006 CITY OF CLEARWAITR 12/08/2005 11:45 7274468036 NORTHSIDE ENGqVCS 6. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS. a.. Proof of Propcrty Qwnersixip b. Land Survey of Property c- Site Plan showing Proposed. Use of Vacated Property d.. Filing Fee per Ordinance No. 5969-96: ($500.00 for a Right-of Way/agcy or $400.00 for an EA.sernent) 7. THE FnI,LOWTNG FOTJR LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION ARE P X, QLTIRED; a. Progress En.crgy b. Verizon Florida, Inc. c, Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. d. Bright Housc PAGE 03/03 S. NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER (PLF,A:3F PRTNT) 0 Same as.Applicant Name: C- Address: 417 2nf zxp-) 4 i e ti\ < e ?.? _ rr _ ?, 9- OWNERS SIGNATURE:FC) '-- ~ Dates. ?•Z?9/0 S NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing i.nstrume"t was acknowledged before me this _ day of 200 Pte' - -, by icr L5? who is Personally known to me or has produced (Type of idei30fica.tion) My Commission expires: O"oly P&,q Irene L. Goroshko * Commission # DD324378 o` Expires June 15, 2008 OF F`? Banded Tmy Fain • Insurance, Inc. 303116.7010 40 Printed on rocycied paper Pape 2 as iderltifica.tion. Name of notary typed, printed or stamped.: G ro Sgeo ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 11 2006 Revr9ed 6/z4/2op5 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ADDRESSES OF UTILITY COMPANIES NOTE: Ask the utility companies listed below to provide you with a letter of "NO OBJECTION" for your proposed vacation request. Provide each a survey of your property showing the area of the street right-of-way, alley or easement proposed to be vacated. Be sure to submit the original signed version of the no objection letters with your vacation application. Progress Energy 2166 Palmetto Street Info: (727) 562-5751 Building "F" Fax: (727) 562-5686 Clearwater. FL 33765 Contact Person Phone O eration Area Jeanne Talhouk (727) 562-3903 . Sunset Point Rd. north to Curlew Rd. west of U.S. 19 e Gulf to Bay Blvd. north to Sunset Point Rd. between Belcher Rd. and Highland Ave. . All of Clearwater Beach Rene' Martin (727) 562-5662 . S.R. 580 north to Curlew Rd. east of U.S. 19 . Sunset Point Rd. north to S.R. 580 east of Belcher Rd. . Belleair Road north to Sunset Point Rd. east of U.S. 19 Craig Kopkau (727) 562-5660 . Belleair .Rd. north to Gulf to Bay Blvd. from U.S...19 to Highland Ave. Veriz®n Florida, Inc. MC: FLCW5033 Info: (727) 562-1193 1280 E. Cleveland Street Fax: (727) 562-9614 Ch-nrwntPr Fir . ' 11,;S Contact Person Phone Q eration Area Vickie Singleton 727 562-1126 . Citywide Knology Broadband of FLSP 2144 Fax: (727) 217-2649 3001 Gandy Blvd. N. Florida, Inc. ilinnllo. ID -lr 1ul 2Z'747 Contact Persoii Phone,. O eratiou Area V V Jay Young (727) 239-0156 Office 727 235-1553 Cell e Citywide `4 Printed on recycled paper ORIGINAL RECEIVED Page 3 APR 1l 2006 PLANNiNU- vtrAkiivicNT CITY OF CLEARWATER Revised 7/12/2005 Bright House 700 Carillon Parkway rage i or 1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED AFK 11 2006 PLANMN : .?.:.W: CITY OF CLEARWATER http://publicgis.myclearwater.com/output/Zoning_MSB-GIS-WEB1000378058.png 12/8/2005 7?1L]E]CN S7CALgJI? STJR VF l.-TG, INC P UFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727-834-8140 FAX: 727-834-8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OF THE SOUTHWEST (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 89° 41'18" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SOUTHWEST (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 18, A DISTANCE OF 653.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 05'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GULF-TO-BAY, (STATE ROAD No. 60), AND BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00° 05'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 268.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 47'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 05'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 268.56 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID GULF-TO-BAY (STATE ROAD No. 60); THENCE SOUTH 89° 41'18" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 2,686 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.0617 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST (1/4) OF SECTION 18-29-16, HAVING A BEARING OF SOUTH 89°41.'18" EAST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN ON SHEET 1 OF 2. 3. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS INVALID WITHOUT SHEET 2 OF 2. ORIGINAL RECEWD APR 11 2006 PLANNING L)k?AK;,v.. NT . z Z Z G? CITY OF CLEARWATER BRUCE A. KLEIN DA PROFESSIONAL SSURVEYOR AND MAPPER FLORIDA LICENSED No. PSM 5052 IDRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION JOB No. 020055.3 DATE: 12/22/05 SHEET: 1 OF 2 SHEETS x] Fil-.z -A - s-rAuB suavIE0NG, INc PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS 8016 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34653 OFFICE: 727-834-8140 FAX: 727-834-8150 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SECTION 18-29-16 S890 41'18"E 653.00' P.O.C. Ig Im I --I r z a) m M I O C -Ti 1= m ;u 0 I0 X I z 01- CID rn I LEGEND: NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE S.W. 1/4 OF 10.00' - SECTION 18-29-16 N890 41'18"E SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 0 n W J Q U 0 30 60 .15 O.R.B. = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NOTES: t0 LO In CO 00 00 O N N W O p N N O p 0 0 O O O p z cn 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST (1/4) OF SECTION 18-29-16, HAVING A BEARING OF SOUTH 89°41'18" EAST. 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY, BUT ONLY A SKETCH OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN ON SHEET 1 OF 2. 3. THIS SKETCH OF SURVEY IS INVALID WITHOUT SHEET 1 OF 2. 10' DRAINAGE & ' UTILITY EASEMENT ?-? O.R.B. 4241, PG. 270 I O N O_ O U-) 00 00 0 0 P.O.B. V) / Z W '- o C= 3 ? (V ce. d U - { U • - OLij a zp _ z? ?U v_ -10.00, N89° 47'09"W DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT & UTILITY EASEMENT VACATIONIJOB No. 020055.3 DATE: 12/22/05 SHEET: 2 OF 2 SHEETSNo. 020055.3 DATE: 12/22/05 SHEET: 2 OF 2 SHEETS I 0 700 Carillon Parkway, Suite 6 St. Petersburg, FL 33716-1101 tel 727.329.2000 fax 727.329.2605 bright house NETWORKS Date: Feb. 10, 2006 Re: 10' Easement, Gulf to Bay Plaza (N89, 41' 18"E) Dear Housh: • 5j Thank you for advising us of subject proposed project/ vacation/ adjustment. XX Bright House has no objection. SEE .NOTES. Bright House has no objections provided easements for our facilities are granted or retained as shown on the attached drawing. Bright House has no objections provided applicant bears the expense for relocation of any Bright House facilities to maintain service to customers affected by the proposed vacation. In order to properly evaluate this request, Bright House will need detailed plans of facilities proposed for subject areas. Bright House has facilities within this area, which may conflict with subject project please call one call locating. SEE NOTES Bright House requires 30 days written notice prior to construction start date to relocate their facilities. Please refer any further correspondence and pre-construction, meeting notices to: W. Scott Creasy at _ (727) 329-2817 NOTES: No Objection. Please contact Dave Jordon for all of your new construction needs at (727) 329-2839. z? WW Please note our new address is 700 Carillon Pkwy. (Suite 6) St. Pete, Fl. 33716. o N ~3 Q_ W U Sincerely, r- q QfL IIJ i Zp W. Scott Creasy U Field Engineer III S Bright house Networks Y .aa Network Engineering VOrIF And Planning 1280 Cleveland St., FLCW5033 JAN 2 6 2006 Clearwater, FL 33755 727-467-0542 727-562-1193 January 19, 2006 Fax: 727-562-1175 Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 , Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Vacation Request - Verizon Central Office - 5213 Dear Ms Williams: Thank you for your letter advising us of your proposed construction. Please be advised that Verizon has existing facilities in the area. These facilities are marked in green as indicated on the attached plans. Your plans indicate the possibility of conflict between your proposed construction and Verizon's facilities. Please review the attached plans carefully to determine if any conflict exists. Conflicts requiring Verizon to relocate facilities would require prepayment from the person making the request for all costs associated therewith. Verizon has no objection to your proposed construction contingent upon your compliance with the above-mentioned procedures. If you require any further information or wish to arrange for the relocation of Verizon's facilities please contact our Outside Plant Engineer Linda Hughes at 727-467-0542. Please contact Sunshine One Call 48 hours prior to commencement of construction at 1-800-432-4770 for, utility location. Thank you for cooperatively working with our office. Sincerely, Sandra A. Lopez Secti M o o o ? Cc U- on anager - OSP Engineering D Ui r-+ 0 U (D `? SAL/LH/ds? ( ??„ O ? ZO 4 U a Progress Energy January 16, 2006 JAN 19 2006 Northside Engineering Services, Inc 601 Cleveland St, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 JAN 2 0 2006 Re: Petition to Vacate Easement Gulf to Bay Plaza / NES #570 Dear Ms. Haines: Progress Energy of Florida has no objection to grant the vacate of the above easement, with the understanding that a new easement will have to be granted for the new overhead facilities. In the event that facilities need to be relocated, financial burden will be the responsibility of the customer. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me - (727) 562-5662. Sincerely, PROGRESS ENERGY OF FLORIDA ?e? 'i /Rene Martin Service Coordinator z? cW W G Q _ Q O L U - Ll O ? ? ? g CL C ft opy 1 0 • KNOL,OGYO Telephone Cable TV Internet 610 February 2, 2006 Doreen Williams Northside Engineering 601 Cleveland St, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Gulf to Bay Plaza / Easement Vacate Request Dear Ms. Doreen Williams: In response to your vacate of easement request concerning the subject project, I have determined the cost to relocate the involved existing Knology facilities will be $1,28913 This cost includes all engineering, construction labor and material associated with the relocation activity required to vacate the easement of concern. It is Knology policy to receive payment in advance of any construction activity. Please notify me if you desire to proceed with this work so that I can provide you with the necessary authorization letter and invoice for payment submittal. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your time and consideration regarding this matter. Sincerely, Jay Young Lead Field Support Technician Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. (727)239-0156 Office (727)235-1553 Cell (727)217-2649 Fax z o; LU UJ u? ?- Q v p? z? q U ? 3001 Gandy Roulevard North o Pinellas Park, FL 33782 • www.knologyx.n, JMWGINAL • -ENED APR 11 2006 Cl"rwattr We 6 Rewwo Clearwater 010 Fes' 3WW- `"r*@W. AWs 33766 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Putoic works Adm)nisuvwn- EMSIMr. Fb(9 wpaKim t U 100 S. MOM Af nus. gets 2W • CFasnraur0e ]3y50 Mid draLrt -'--h- This worksheet Is r"U"idi to be subrof odi to and sppruv+d by the Authoft Mawg Jurfsdmw (AMJ) battle any permits for now building constructlon, balding expansion or fire hydrants Y A& be tssued by the City or Clearwater. bler nadoo and dmlgn (wet oola(ly web Slandald euldhV Cods, Chapter g - Fh Prdleatlsn Slisteme. appicawOVlACods (NFPA 13, 73b, M 13R, K iS il41, andfor 1142) and AWWA M-17 • Irwbdbgw% FI*M Taadng end MsNlsnanee omen Hydrants. Pro sot siforrrraUon Project Name: CALLt= To 6" -PtA LrZA ,n G ?A Pro)eci Address: G v t/ ? "rO b.A f LZ 46C s G C.C p pjGR--• Project AAdrass: Gen" V4n9r Sialarn frAennatien Locadonof nprestFire ?hdreft SE t;ORt? - cJF 6Q0Cr--P-'1 (or3 Srr ?-r? Size of Water Main euPPllfig Firm Flow: Bit Looped 9yatam or Geed-end HrM? L Static: 52 psi ResidaW AcJ pd Flo 1040 Qpre oistanee of fast gsu0sa relatlrs to Ofe bass of Use riser. Narmmkal 0 it Vsseeal (Bunton) 0 rt MydrardText Conductsdby Gl-nt OF G .?aAn'?ER. l.rA-TAR- DG-PAr?'rME??fi- (IrWudefahach copy of actual tort=tleet) NFPA Fletard Clasaitlesaon ?r Area 0 TA 41.- Clasaffleallm Z ossc QFQarV I I RG T l l rc. 4 r t E STOft? Ofzi - Pz , G I attach additionai snows n requirou. poaJgn PararaeMrs .??• n.¦¦Yra ria¦e fanral Arse / WE f T ? l 5oa O, 20 ?" ' - ? V-eTAI u A QCf t? W T Or'LO O O f¢ocG-¢ wet 3oc? 0.2S v allach additional anDWIS ¦ (Sousa D5? GPM TOTAL NEEOEO FIRE FLAW (IhLF.F_): IS EXISTING SYSTEM SUPPLY SUFF93ENT MEET N.F.F. ABOVE? = W ® YES Code*& W Standards _ S a? s NFPA SLndsrd Haar Emsar ants LAnor ¦.¦r..a......._ ? ?- f D TS fSTI C, allow a00axmal arreen a reguva NIA /Q May: ff'Project" Ilrqudes s Firs Pump, supply the fall l v Fire Pump kdorraatlon: Pump Capacity: gpm Chun Preaaxe: Rated Prewar. On-aft Storage Tank Cepcttti(7); NIA Preparer Neese: Company Nemo: Melling Address: cny: - State: psi Pressuea150%aow. psi PW G ?-6NeL,6S 'DA',j IS G??S st t?wcs Aoo4' WcoPAc-R(-- LP-?- 6 TA-mPA Ft, Phone: g I') 2`Z0 156 2e, ?: 331o?s1' Fax: 9&13 168 32Z0 _^' ems. ?•? ? ) =f l' © ' 0 0 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. l a 1 F 1? TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR GULF-TO-BAY PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: RMC PROPERTY GROUP PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. DECEMBER 2005 PROJECT # 05-127 W-' / 1( Robert Pergoli CP • 2 AICP #9023 PF,ANNi+a;;; i OEVU Pki! 1 9 0 I. INTRODUCTION The applicant is proposing to redevelop their property into a shopping center containing 87,500 square feet of retail space. The property is located on the southeastern corner of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Belcher Road and presently contains 79,522 square feet of retail space. (See Figure 1) The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment. This application requires an assessment of the traffic impacts of development. As part of the redevelopment the existing shopping center will be demolished. Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The property has frontage on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Belcher Road. The south driveway to Belcher Road is signalized and access to Gulf-to-Bay is via a ' full median opening located 380 feet east of the Belcher Road intersection and a right-in / right-out service drive to the east. Gulf-to Bay Boulevard (SR 60) is a six-lane divided arterial roadway with a posted speed of 40 MPH and is classified ' by FDOT as an access class 7 roadway having spacing standards of 330 feet for directional median openings and 660 feet for full median openings. Belcher Road is a four-lane divided arterial roadway with a posted speed of 35 MPH and a ' driveway spacing standard of 120 feet. Traffic counts were conducted in December 2005 at the following intersections during the PM peak hours (4-6 ' PM): Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard / Belcher Road (signal) ' Belcher Road / Project South Driveway (signal) Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard / Median Opening Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard / Right-in/right-out service drive ' All traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. According to the traffic counts Gulf-to-Bay ' Boulevard carries 4,651 adjacent to the site and Belcher Road carries 2,497 vehicles adjacent to the site. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS software. The HCS printouts ' are included in Appendix A. The Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard/Belcher Road intersection presently operates at LOS ' F during the PM peak hour with average delay being 88.2 seconds per vehicle. The intersection at Belcher Road / South Driveway operates at LOS A with average delay being 6.8 seconds per vehicle. At the main full access driveway to Gulf to Bay Boulevard westbound left turns entering the site operate at LOS F and vehicles exiting the site operate at LOS C. At the service drive at the eastern end of the property right turns exiting the site operate at LOS D. 1 a N V'. O O N N m U U Ir LL m .3 12 0 N 0 N a T x ? U o d 0 a y (7 PROJECT NO: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2005) 05-1 27 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 122005 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. 0 0 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard between Belcher Road and US 19 is reported by the MPO 2005 Level of Service Report to be operating at LOS C with an average travel speed of 22.34 MPH. This report calculates the directional capacity of 3,070 vehicles per hour, and a two-way capacity of 5,580 vehicles per hour. According to the adjusted traffic counts, this segment of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard operates at LOS C. Belcher Road between Nursery Road and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard is reported by the MPO 2005 Level of Service Report to be operating at LOS D with an average travel speed of 20.65 MPH. This report calculates the directional capacity of 1,840 vehicles per hour and a two-way capacity of 3,350. According to the adjusted traffic counts, this segment of Belcher Road operates at LOS D. III. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS As per the approved methodology existing traffic was adjusted by a 1.5% annual growth rate to the expected build-out year of 2007 to account for background traffic from other nearby redevelopment projects. The proposed redevelopment project on the subject property is expected to generate 6,226 daily trips of which 573 would occur during the PM peak hour (275 entering / 298 exiting) according to ITE Trip Generation, 7t' Edition. In addition 40% of the trips are expected to be pass-by capture. The vehicular access will be taken from the signalized entrance on Belcher Road, a proposed right-in/right-out to Belcher Road and via full access driveways that align with existing median openings on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The expected distribution was based on the existing traffic pattern at the shopping center driveways and is as follows: 45% south on Belcher Road 10% north on Belcher Road 30% east on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard 15 % west on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Since this project is a complete redevelopment of an existing shopping center of similar size, an increase in traffic generation is not expected, however, due to relocation of driveways, the usage of driveways is expected to change. Future operations at the intersections and adjacent roadway segments were analyzed using HCS software and FDOT Generalized Capacity Tables. Future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, and the HCS printouts and graphs from NCHRP Report # 279 are included in Appendix B. The Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard/Belcher Road intersection would continue to operate at LOS F with average delay being 97.2 seconds per vehicle. The Belcher Road/ South Driveway intersection would continue to operate at LOS A with average delay being 6.6 seconds per vehicle. At the proposed right-in/right-out driveway 2 a v a M m 3 0 m 3 0 N 0 a oa w? O ?N J y ¦ W Z ? N n .? L 280 ° M -1667 2142 ?- 2118 I L 195 54 GULF TO BAY BLVD 178 f r 2489- r 2519 30 -? 2043 -? ca ao r7 N ? 138 °'rn' 00 0 0 f N H P I L- 15 W? NORTH DRIV EWAY U rF N ° 23 ' 134 SOUTH I r DRIVEWAY N CD f M 1i rn M -2159 _ 2187 F 28 2542 0 2572 - M WQ SITE 573 PM PEAK TRIPS (275 ENTER/298 EXIT) PROJECT NO: FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (2007) 05-127 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 122005 DRAWN BY: 3 G.J.S. } 0 ' to Belcher Road, right turns exiting the site would operate at LOS B. At the main driveway to Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard westbound left turns would operate at LOS F, ' and the northbound approach exiting the site would operate at LOS F. At the eastern driveway connection to Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, westbound left turns would operate at LOS D, and the northbound approach exiting the site would operate at LOS F. The existing left turn lane at the main driveway is adequate to accommodate ' future demand which would require 50 feet of queue storage plus 185 feet of deceleration distance per MOT Index # 301. At the eastern driveway a westbound left turn lane containing 50 feet of queue storage plus 185 feet of ' deceleration distance per MOT Index # 301 should be constructed. Right-turn lanes are not warranted along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. At the driveways to Belcher Road northbound right turn lanes are warranted and should be constructed where right-of-way permits. Considering background traffic and project impacts Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard would operate at LOS C carrying 4,759 vehicles during the PM peak hour, and Belcher Road would operate at LOS D carrying 2,552 vehicles during the PM peak hour. IV. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates the impact of the project will be minimal since it is a redevelopment of an existing shopping center. The modification of driveways will require an MOT permit and Pinellas County Right-of-Way Use permit. The construction of a westbound left turn lane at the eastern driveway is required, and the construction of northbound right turn lanes on Belcher Road is warranted at the project driveways to Belcher Road. 3 r. APPENDIXA ion Detailed Report 0 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS2000T' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 1211412005 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection GULF TO BAY/BELCHER Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/PIN CO. Analysis Year 2005 EXISTING Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 173 1983 134 189 1618 272 190 891 149 314 743 101 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 25 0 45 0 25 0 20 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 G= 12.0 G= 63.0 G= G= G= 16.0 I G= 37.0 G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 150.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and L OS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 180 2180 197 1921 198 1057 327 858 Lane group capacity,c 192 2114 192 2092 239 859 239 862 v/c ratio, X 0.94 1.03 1.03 0.92 0.83 1.23 1.37 1.00 0.53 1 0.42 0.53 0.42 0.39 1 0.25 1 0.39 0.25 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20 Settings\Temp\s2k3 ... 12/14/2005 Detailed Report 0 • Page 2 of 2 Total green ratio, g/C Uniform delay, d, 45.7 43.5 48.8 41.1 40.2 56.5 45.9 56.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.872 1.000 0.872 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.45 0.50 0.50 0.44 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 47.3 28.1 71.9 7.1 21.0 113.9 190.1 29.4 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 93.0 66.1 120.7 42.9 61.1 170.4 236.0 85.9 Lane group LOS F E F D E F F F Approach delay 68.1 50.1 153.2 127.3 Approach LOS E D F F Intersection delay 88.2 c = 1.59 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k3... 12/14/2005 Detailed Report • • Page 1 of 2 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. Date Performed 1211512005 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection BELCHER / SOUTH DRIVEWAY Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction PIN. CO. Analysis Year 2005 EXISTING Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L R TR L T Volume, V (vph) 165 47 1183 116 33 1033 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 4 3 4 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 10 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only 0 2 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 17.0 G= G= G= G= 43.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 70.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 192 55 1499 38 1201 Lane group capacity, c 430 384 2152 161 2179 v/c ratio, X 0.45 0.14 0.70 0.24 0.55 Total green ratio, g/C 0.24 0.24 0.61 0.61 0.61 Uniform delay, d, 22.5 20.8 9.1 6.1 7.9 file://C:\Documents%20and%20 Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20 S ettings\Temp\s2k4... 12/15/2005 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 0 0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 0.540 1.000 0.540 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.26 0.11 0.15 Incremental delay, d2 0.7 0.2 1.0 0.8 0.3 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 23.2 21.0 5.9 6.8 4.6 Lane group LOS C C A A A Approach delay 22.7 5.9 4.6 Approach LOS C A A Intersection delay 6.8 Xc = 0.63 Intersection LOS A HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k4... 12/15/2005 Two-Way Stop Control • Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst RP Intersection DRIVE ' " ""' / '"'?"° Agency/Co. I GCC Jurisdiction FDOT Date Performed 1211512005 sis Year Anal 2005 EXISTING y [Analysis Time Period PM PEAK Project Description East/West Street: GULF TO BAY North/South Street: MAIN DRIVEWAY Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 2383 63 74 2074 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 2508 66 77 2183 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 2 Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 0 116 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 5 0 122 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Len th Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 77 127 Capacity, cm (vph) 124 351 /c ratio 0.62 0.36 Queue length (95%) 3.19 1.61 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 12/15/2005 Two-Way Stop Control 0 0 Page 2 of 2 Control Delay s/veh 72.8 21.0 LOS F C pproach delay s/veh 21.0 [Approach LOS -- -- C HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f file://C:\Documents%20and%20 Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20 Settings\Temp\u2k4... 12/15/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information 11 ?1 it c -reO A V /0=1 Pt-= Analyst RP Intersection ""`r DRIVE Agency/Co. GCC Jurisdiction FDOT Date Performed 1211512005 sis Year Anal 2005 EXISTING y nTime Period PM PEAK Project Description East/West Street: GULF TO BAY North/South Street: SERVICE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 2497 2 0 2148 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 2628 2 0 2261 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 0 2 0 Configuration T R T U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 0 6 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 6 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 2 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R Volume, v (vph) 6 Capacity, cm (vph) 151 /c ratio 0.04 Queue length (95%) 0.12 file://C:\Documents%20and%20 Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 12/15/2005 Two-Way Stop Control 0 0 Page 2 of 2 Control Delay s/veh 29.8 LOS D pproach delay s/veh 29.8 pproach LOS -- -- D HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 12/15/2005 t Print Date: Aug/11/2005 . Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Peak Season Factor Category Report ' MELLAS COUNTYWIDE Category: 1500 Week Dates SF PSCF 1 01/01/2004 - 01/03/2004 1.05 1.12 ' 2 01/04/2004 - 01/10/2004 1.04 1.11 3 01/11/2004 - 01/17/2004 1.03 1.10 4 01/18/2004 - 01/24/2004 1.02 1.09 ' S 01/25/2004 - 01/31/2004 1.00 1.06 6 02/01/2004 - 02/07/2004 0.98 1.04 * 7 02/08/2004 - 02/14/2004 0.97 1.03 * 8 02/15/2004 - 02/21/2004 0.95 1.01 * 9 02/22/2004 - 02/28/2004 0.94 1.00 * 10 02/29/2004 - 03/06/2004 0.93 0.99 11 03/07/2004 - 03/13/2004 0.92 0.98 * 12 03/14/2004 - 03/20/2004 0.91 0.97 * 13 03/21/2004 - 03/27/2004 0.92 0.98 * 14 03/28/2004 - 04/03/2004 0.93 0.99 * 15 04/04/2004 - 04/10/2004 0.93 0.99 ' * 16 04/11/2004 - 04/17/2004 0.94 1.00 * 17 04/18/2004 - 04/24/2004 0.95 1.01 * 18 04/25/2004 - 05/0V2004 0.96 1.02 ' * 19 05/02/2004 - 05/08/2004 0.97 1.03 20 05/09/2004 - 05/15/2004 0.98 1.04 21 05/16/2004 - 05/22/2004 0.98 1.04 22 05/23/2004 - 05/29/2004 0.99 1.05 23 05/30/2004 - 06/05/2004 0.99 1.05 24 06/06/2004 - 06/12/2004 0.99 1.05 25 06/13/2004 - 06/19/2004 1.00 1.06 26 06/20/2004 - 06/26/2004 1.00 1.06 27 06/27/2004 - 07/03/2004 1.00 1.06 28 07/04/2004 - 07/10/2004 1.00 1.06 ' 29 07/11/2004 - 07/17/2004 1.00 1.06 30 07/18/2004 - 07/24/2004 1.01 1.07 31 07/25/2004 - 07/31/2004 1.02 1.09 ' 32 08/01/2004 - 08/07/2004 1.03 1.10 33 08/08/2004 - 08/14/2004 1.04 1.11 34 08/15/2004 - 08/21/2004 1.05 1.12 35 08/22/2004 - 08/28/2004 1.07 1.14 ' 36 08/29/2004 - 09/04/2004 1.08 1.15 37 09/05/2004 - 09/11/2004 1.10 1.17 38 09/12/2004 - 09/18/2004 1.11 1.18 ' 39 09/19/2004 - 09/25/2004 1.09 1.16 40 09/26/2004 - 10/02/2004 1.06 1.13 41 10/03/2004 - 10/09/2004 1.03 1.10 42 10/10/2004 - 10/16/2004 1.01 1.07 ' 43 10/17/2004 - 10/23/2004 1.01 1.07 44 10/24/2004 - 10/30/2004 1.02 1.09 45 10/31/2004 - 11/06/2004 1.02 1.09 ' 46 11/07/2004 - 11/13/2004 1.03 1.10 47 11/14/2004 - 11/20/2004 1.04 1.11 48 11/21/2004 - 11/27/2004 1.04 1.11 49 11/28/2004 - 12/04/2004 1.04 1.11 ' 50 12/05/2004 - 12/11/2004 1.04 1.11 51 12/12/2004 - 12/18/2004 1.05 1.12 52 12/19/2004 - 12/25/2004 1.04 1.11 ' 53 12/26/2004 - 12/31/2004 1.03 1.10 MOCF = 0.94 Arterial Area LOS LOS LOS MSV Analysis Section ID: 595 Length Class T e Method STD Mult Mult MSV Speed - LOS 595 - BELCHER RD: (ULMERTON RD -to-EAST BAY DR) 1.53 2 2 ApCalc.DLL D 1.00 1.00 2,850 35.92 A Base % % % Lane # Fac Sat Hvy No Excl Posted Arr Signal Cycl Physical Trav Seg Seg Segment: Jur FIHS T eALF Len Si T AADT KFact DFact Volume Flow PHF Vhcl Pass Turns Speed T T Len /C Capacity v/c Time Speed LOS 4670 - BELCHER RD: (ULMERTON RD -to- 142ND AVE N) CR 0 6D .00 .509 1 SA 21,496 .095 .55 1,123 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 45 4 1 130 .44 2,612 0.43 60.3 30.40 B A 4660- BELCHER RD: 142ND AVE N -to- EAST BAY DR CR 0 6D .001.018 1 SA 32,920 .095 .55 1,720 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 45 4 1 120 .52 3,127 0.55 9; 39.50 "!rte Arterial Area LOS LOS LOS MSV Analysis Section ID: 596 Len th Class Type Method STD Mult Mult MSV Speed LOS 596 - BELCHER RD: (EAST BAY DR -to-NURSERY RD) 1.77 2 2 ApCaIc.DLL D 1.00 1.00 1,900 25.02 C Base % % % Lane # Fac Sat Hvy No Excl Posted Arr Signal Cycl Physical Trav Seg Seg S ment: Jur FIHS T eALF Len Si T AADT KFact DFact Volume Flow PHF Vhcl Pass Turns Speed T T Len /C Capacity v/c Time Speed LOS 4650.1- BELCHER RD: (EAST BAY DR-lo- LANCASTER DR) CR 0 4D .001.009 1 SA 26,395 .095 .55 1,379 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 3 1 140 .44 1,768 0.78 8 123.1 29.50 00 80 6 23 B C 4650.2 - BELCHER RD: (LANCASTER DR-to- BELLEAIR RD) CR 0 4D .00 .514 1 SA 26,395 .095 .55 1,379 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 3 1 140 4 1 140 .44 45 1,768 791 1 0.7 0 77 . . 3 17 50 51 D 2800- BELCHER RD: BELLEAIR RD -to- NURSERY RD CR 0 4D .00 .250 1 SA 26,395 .095 .55 1,379 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 . , . . . Arterial Area LOS LOS LOS MSV Analysis Section ID: 597 Length Class Typ e Method STD Mult Mult MSV pee ! LOS 597 - BELCHER RD: (NURSERY RD -to-SR 601GULF-TO-BAY) 1.27 2 2 ApCaIc.DLL D 1.00 1.00 1,840 20.6 D Base % % % - Lane # Fac Sat Hvy No Excl Posted Arr Signal Cycl Physical Trav Seg Seg Segment: Jur FIHS T eALF Len Si T AADT KFact DFact Volume Flow PHF Vhcl Pass Turns Speed T T Len /C Capacity v/c Time Speed LOS 2790.1- BELCHER RD: (NURSERY RD -to- OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCH) CR 0 4D .00 .316 1 SA 26,395 .095 .55 1,379 1,900. .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 4 2 140 .46 1,839 0.75 56.2 20.20 D 2790.2 - BELCHER RD: (OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCH -to- HARN BLVD) CR 0 4D .00 .237 1 $A 26,395 .095 .55 1,379 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 4 2 140 .90 3,629 0.38 22.2 38.40 A 2790.3- BELCHER RD: (HARN BLVD-to- DRUID RD) CR 0 4D .00 .459 1 SA 26,395 .095 .55 1,379 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 4 2 140 .46 1,839 0.75 69.5 23.80 C. _ 2780.1- BELCHER RD: (DRUID RD -to- PUBLIX ENTRY) CR 0 4D .00 .118 1 SA 26,395 .095 .55 1379 1,900 _ .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 35 4 2 150 .50 1,999 - 0.69. 35. 12.10 F 2780.2 - BELCHER RD: PUBLIX ENTRY -to- SR 60/GULF-TO-BAY) CR 0 4D .00 .137 1 SA 26,395 .095 .55 1,379) 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 35 4 2 150 .50 1,999 0.69 37.8 13.00 E 0 tvltu "r . tp> - A ?tV Arterial Area LOS LOS LOS MSV Anal sis Section ID: 598 Length Class Type Method STD Mult Mult MSV S eed LO 598 - BELCHER RD: (SR 601GULF-TO-BAY -to-NE COACHMAN RD) .81 2 2 ApCalc.DLL D. 1.00 1.00 900 6.03 F Base % % % Lane # Fac Sat Hvy No Excl Posted Arr Signal Cycl Physical Trav Sag Seg Segment: Jur FIHS Type ALF Len Si T AADT KFact DFact Volume Flow PHF Vhcl Pass Turns Speed T T Len /C Capacity v/c Time Speed LO 2770- BELCHER RD: (SR 60/GULF-TO-BAY -to- CLEVELAND ST) CR 0 4U .00 .335 1 SA 33,008 .095 .55 1,725 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 35 4 1 150 .40 1,337 1.29 207.3 5.80 F 2760-BELCHERRD:(CLEVELAND ST -to- DREW ST) CR 0 4U .00.177 1 SA 33,008 .095 .55 1,725 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 0.00 35 4 1 150 .39 1,307 1.32 207.4 3.10 F 2750 - BELCHER RD: DREW ST -to- NE COACHMAN RD) CR 0 4U .00 .294 1 SA 31,250 .095 .55 1,633 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 0.00 35 4 1 150 .49 1,613 1.00 66.5 15.90 E Denotes value different from FDOT'defauIV. **Default non-signalized values applied. For a.description of report variables and values, please refer to the last page of the report Tindale-Oliver and Associates Produced using: vTIMAS Page: 67 Tampa, Florida Arterial Area LOS LOS LOS MSV lnal sis Sidon ID: 820 Length Class Type Method STD Mult Mult MSV Speed LOS 820 - GULFPORT BLVD: (PASADENA AVE -to-64TH ST S) 1.85 2 2 ApCalc.DLL D 1.00 1.00 1,700 25.64 C Base % %"` % Lane # Fac Sat Hvy No Excl Posted Arr Signal Cycl Physical Trav Seg Seg ment: Se Jur FIHST eALF Len Si T AADT KFact DFacl Volume Flow. PHF Vhcl Pass Turns Speed T T Len /C Ca aci v/c Time Speed LOS 70 E 7 16 49 g 1- GULFPORT BLVD: (PASADENA AVE -lo- OLEANDER WAY) 12130 CR 0 4D .00 .231 1 SA 19,314 .095 .55 1,009 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 35 4 4 1 120 1 120 .40 40 1,602 607 1 0.63 0 6 3 . . 2 24.10 76 C . 12130.2 - GULFPORT BLVD: (OLEANDER WAY -to- 64TH ST S) CR .0 4D .00 .509 1 SA 19,314 .095 .55 1,009 1,900 900 55 955 1 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 35 00 35 00 12 00 0 925 0 - See . Note.B , eloti `" , 1 . 84.8 37.50 A 12110- GULFPORT BLVD: (58TH ST S -to-15TH AVE S) CR 0 4D .00 .8B3 0 SA 18,276 .095 095 , . 900 55 982 1 . . . . 00 35 4 00 12 00 0 925 0 1 120 .40 i,610 0.61 49.3 16.70 E. 12120 - GULFPORT BLVD: 15TH AVE S -to- 64TH ST S CR 0 4D .00 .228 1 SA 18,795 . , . . . . . Arterial Area LOS LOS LOS MSV MSV Seed LOS Length Class Type Method STD - Mult Mult Analysis Section ID: 821 76 2 DLL D 1.00 1.00 2 ApCalc 3,310- 21.24 D 821- GULF-TO-BAY BLVD: (HIGHLAND AVE -to-KEENE_ R D) . . Lane # Fac Base Sat % % % Hvy No Excl Posted Arr Signal Cycl Physical. Trav Seg Seg' Segment Jur FIHSType ALF Len Si T AADT KFact DFacl Volume Flow PHF Vhcl Pass Turns Speed T T Len /C Capacity v/c Time Speed LOS 80 D 21 . 3570 - GULF-TO-BAY BLVD: (HIGHLAND AVE-to- LAKE AVE) SR 0 6D .00 .253 1 SA 46,348 .095 .55 2,422 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 4 0 40 4 1 150 1 150 .55 55 3,318 281 3 0.73 80 0 . 41.7 8 21.20 43 D . 3560.1- GULF-TO-BAY BLVD: (LAKE AVE-to- S DUNCAN AVE) SR 0 -6D .00 .257 1 SA 50,234 .095 .55 2,625 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.0 40 4 1 150 . 55 , 3 281 . 80 0 . 7 20.80 42 D 3560.2 - GULF-TO-BAY BLVD: (S DUNCAN AVE -to- KEENE RD SR 0 6D .00 .246 1 SA 50,234 .095 .55 2,625 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 . , . . Analysis Section ID: 822 822 - GULF-TO-BAY BLVD: (KEENE RD -to-BELCHER RD) Length 1.03 Arterial Class 2 Area LOS LOS LOS MSV Type Method STD Mult Mult _ 2 ApCalc.DLL . D 1.00 1.00 MSV 2,550 Seed 9.95 LOS F Se ment: 3550.1- GULF-TO-BAY BLVD: (KEENE RD -to- S ARCTURAS DR) 3550.2 - GULF-TO-BAY BLVD: (S ARCTURAS DR -to- HERCULES AVE) 3540- GULF-TO-BAY BLVD: HERCULES AVE -to- BELCHER RD) Lane # Fac Jur FIHST eALF Len Si T SR 0 6D .00 .269 1 SA SR 0 6D .00 .247 1 SA SR 0 6D .00 .510 1 SA AADT 55,928 55,928 53,836 Base Sat KFacl DFact Volume Flow .095 .55 2,922 1,900 .095 .55 2,922 1,900 .095 .55 2,813 1,900 % % % Hvy No Excl Posted Art Signal Cycl PHF Vhcl Pass Turns Speed T T Len .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 4 1 150 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 4 1 150 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 4 1 150 /C .43 .43 .43 Physical Capacity 2,586 2,586 2,581 v/c 1.13 1.13 1.09 Trav Seg Seg Time Speed LOS 123.7 7.80 F 121.8 7.30 F 125.9 14.60 F Analysis Section ID: 823 Length Arterial Class Area LOS Type Method LOS LOS MSV STD Mult Mult _ MSV See LOS 823 - GULF-TO-BAY BLVD: (BELCHER RD -to-US 19) - .99 2 2 ApCaic.DLL D 1.00 1.00 - 3,070 22.3 C Base % % % Lane # Fac Sat Hvy No Excl Posted Arr Signal Cycl Physical Trav Seg Sag Segment: Jur FIHSType ALF Len Si T AADT KFact DFacl Volume Flow PHF Vhcl Pass Turns Speed T T Len /C Capacity v/c Time Speed tOS 3530.1- GULF-TO-BAY BLVD: (BELCHER RD -to- OLD COACHMAN RD) SR N 6D .00 .740 1 SA 55,222 - .095 .55- 2,885 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 4 1 135 .48 2,885 1.00 101.1 26.30 8 15 40 00 57 1 C E 3530.2 - GULF-TO-BAY BLVD: OLD COACHMAN RD-to- US 19 SR N 6D .00 .247 1 SA 55,222 .095 .55 2,885 1,900 .925 0.00 0.00 12.00 40 4 1 135 .48 2,885 . . . Denotes value different from FDOT'default'. **Default non-signalized values applied. For a description of report variables and values, please refer to the last page of the report Tindale-Oliver and Associates Produced using: vTIMAS Tampa, Florida Page: 97 i • 11 ' TABLE 4-4 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR TWO-WAY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S URBANIZED AREAS* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS FREEWAYS Level of Service Interchange spacing> 2 mi. apart Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided 180 620 1,210 1,720 2,370 Lanes A B C D E 4 Divided 1,940 3,140 4,540 5,870 6,670 4 2,310 3,840 5,350 6,510 7,240 6 Divided 2,900 4,700 6,800 8,810 10,010 6 3,580 5,930 8,270 10,050 11,180 STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS 8 4,840 8,020 11,180 13,600 15,130 Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) 10 6,110 10,110 14,110 17,160 19,050 Level of Service 12 7,360 12,200 17,020 20,710 23,000 Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided ** 400 1,310 1,560 1,610 Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart 4 Divided 460 2,780 3,300 32390 *** Level of Service 6 Divided 700 4,240 4,950 C 080 *** Lanes A B C D E 8 Divided 890 5,510 6,280 6,440 *** 4 2,050 3,350 4,840 6,250 7,110 6 3,240 5,250 7,600 9,840 11,180 Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) 8 4,420 7,160 10,360 13,420 15,240 Level of Service 10 5,600 9,070 13,130 16,980 19,310 Lanes Divided A B C D E 12 6,780 10,980 15,890 20,560 23,360 2 Undivided ** 180 1,070 1,460 1,550 4 Divided ** 390 2,470 C,3,110'i 3,270 6 Divided ** 620 3,830 4,680 4,920 BICYCLE MODE 8 Divided ** 800 5,060 6,060 6,360 (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number within primary city central business district of an of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) urbanized area over 750,000) Paved Shoulder Level of Service Bicycle Lane Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E Coverage A B C D E 2 Undivided ** ** 500 1,200 1,470 049% ** ** 310 1,310 >1,310 4 Divided ** ** 1,180 2,750 3,120 50-84% ** 240 390 >390 *** 6 Divided ** ** 1,850 4,240 4,690 85-100% 300 680 >680 *** *** 8 Divided ** ** 2,450 5,580 6,060 PEDESTRIAN MODE Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and within (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway primary city central business district of an urbanized area geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians over 750,000) using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number Level of Service of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided ** ** 490 1,310 1,420 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** ** 1,170 2,880 3,010 049% ** ** ** 600 1,480 6 Divided ** ** 1,810 4,350 4,520 50-84% ** ** ** 940 1,800 8 Divided ** ** 2,460 5,690 5,910 85-100% ** 210 1,080 >1,080 *** NON-STATE ROADWAYS BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) Major City/County Roadways (Buses per hour) Level of Service (Note: Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of higher traffic now.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided ** ** 870 1,390 1,480 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** ** 2,030 2,950 3,120 0-84% ** >5 >4 >3 >2 6 Divided ** ** 3,170 4,450 4,690 85-100% >6 >4 >3 >2 >1 ARTERIAL/NON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS Other Signalized Roadways DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED (signalized intersection analysis) (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) Level of Service Lanes Median Left Turns Lanes Adjustment Factors Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Divided Yes +5% 2 Undivided ** ** 450 950 1,200 2 Undivided No -20% 4 Divided ** ** 1,050 2,070 2,400 Multi Undivided Yes -5% Source: Florida Department of Transportation 02/22/02 Multi Undivided No -25% Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 ONE-WAY FACILITIES Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 Decrease corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 40% to http://wwwl l.myflorida.com/planning/systems/sm/los/default.htm obtain the equivalent one directional volume for one-way facilities. *Th is table does not constitutes standard and should be used only for genera l planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for mom specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for co rridor or intersection design, where mom refined techniques exist. Values shown are hourly two-way volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Level of service letter grade thresholds am probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall madway level of service is not recommended. To convert to annual average daily traffic volumes, these volumes must be divided by an appropriate K factor. The table's input value de faults and level of service criteria appear on the following page. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Cap acity and Quali ty of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. **Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. ***Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For automobile/truck m odes, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievabl e, because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. 91 lb *mole %wo# APPENDIX B • Shopping Center (820) • Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 302 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 328 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 42.94 12.50 - 270.89 21.38 Data Plot and Equation 70,000 60,000 50,000 U a c W CL H 40,000 U L N Cz 30,000 N 20,000 10,000 o ,-- I I I I I 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X Actual Data Points _- ------ Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equatiin Ln(T) = 0.65 Ln(X) + 5.83 ~\ R2 = 0.78 X X X X, X ----;---- X X ; X X X. X X• X X XX. /:X X. X . . - - - - - - -• - - - - - X .. - - - -•-X ... X . . X X . XX X . X X . X'. x X X 'X x x ;X ; X X '?' >0< XX X X X ; XX X Yx XX h X; X X X? X ; X Trip Generation, 7th Edition 1451 Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 0 Shopping Center (820) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 407 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 379 Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.75 0.68 - 29.27 2.75 Data Plot and Equation 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 W d m 5,000 U L am rn 4,000 co Q F'! 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 0 X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equ tl 1000 2000 3000 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate Ln(T) = 0.66 Ln(X) + 3.40-,, RZ = 0.81 ............... --------- ----------- ------- ,---------- -------- ---------------------- ---- ........ ,.---------------------.--------- X ' X X -------- ---------- ---x-------- XX ----- X X ' X X X -------- x / X X xx X ':' X A</ X X X......... - ,- X X X.' X? X X X X , X X >,XX X X X XS/ XXX X X X }X , X k x X X-X-- --- = ........... -------------------- Y X XX X Trip Generation, 7th Edition 1453 Institute of Transportation Engineers • Figure 5.5 Shopping Center (820) Average Pass-By Trip Percentage vs: 1,000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday, p.m. Peak Period Number of Studies: 100 Average 1,000 Sq. Feet GLA: 329 Data Plot 90 80 70 m U 60 a H 50 A CO N 40 m c?4 Q 30 F- 20 10 0 X .X- , --- --• ----- --- ---- , --- ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- X ; X X x X , >o<•---X------------------------------- ...- - --;------ =------= X X x x X XX X X. x XX x : X. X X X XX X X . X. ... X ,X--- ..-- ---- -- ......-i x .R • x 3£ X X Xx x X ;x ;x XX X x x x . X. X• 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = -0.29 Ln(X) + 5.00 R2 = 0.37 Q 'jk pct -6 Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition Chapter 5 ¦ ITE 47 I Detailed Report 9 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 1211512005 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection GULF TO BAY/BELCHER Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/PIN CO. Analysis Year 2007 WITH PROJECT Project ID Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 178 2043 138 195 1667 280 196 918 153 323 765 105 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 25 0 45 0 25 0 20 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 I Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 G= 12.0 G= 63.0 G= G= G= 16.0 G= 37.0 G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 150.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and L OS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 185 2246 203 1981 204 1089 336 886 Lane group capacity,c 192 2114 192 2092 239 859 239 862 v/c ratio, X 0.96 1.06 1.06 0.95 0.85 1.27 1.41 1.03 0.53 1 0.42 0.53 0.42 0.39 1 0.25 0.39 0.25 file://C:\Documents%20and%20 S ettings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k4... 12/15/2005 Detailed Report 0 Page 2 of 2 Total green ratio, g/C Uniform delay, di 46.9 43.5 48.8 41.9 38.3 56.5 45.9 56.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.872 1.000 0.872 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.47 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.39 0.50 0.50 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 54.3 38.6 80.9 9.9 24.6 129.7 205.8 38.0 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 101.2 76.6 129.7 46.5 62.9 186.2 251.7 94.5 Lane group LOS F E F D E F F F Approach delay 78.5 54.2 166.8 137.7 Approach LOS E D F F Intersection delay 97.2 Xc = 1.71 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k4... 12/15/2005 Detailed Report 0 • Page 1 of 2 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. Date Performed 1211512005 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection BELCHER/SOUTH DRIVEWAY Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction PIN. CO. Analysis Year 2007 WITH PROJECT Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L R TR L T Volume, V (vph) 134 23 1272 81 33 1065 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 4 3 4 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 10 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only 0 2 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 17.0 G= G= G= G= 43.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 70.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 156 27 1562 38 1238 Lane group capacity, c 430 384 2161 145 2179 v/c ratio, X 0.36 0.07 0.72 0.26 0.57 Total green ratio, g/C 0.24 0.24 0.61 0.61 0.61 Uniform delay, d, 22.0 20.4 9.4 6.2 8.0 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k4... 12/15/2005 Detailed Report 0 9 Page 2 of 2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 0.540 1.000 0.540 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.28 0.11 0.16 Incremental delay, d2 0.5 0.1 1.2 1.0 0.4 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 22.5 20.5 6.3 7.2 4.7 Lane group LOS C C A A A Approach delay 22.2 6.3 4.7 Approach LOS C A A Intersection delay 6.6 X,? = 0.62 Intersection LOS A HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20 Settings\Temp\s2k4... 12/15/2005 Two-Way Stop Control • • Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY eneral Information I Site Information nalyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period RP GCC 1211512005 PM PEAK Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year BELCHER / NORTH DRIVE PIN. CO. 2007 WITH PROJECT Project Description East/West Street: NORTH DRIVEWAY North/South Street: BELCHER ROAD Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 1252, 43 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1252 43 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - -- 0 -- - Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 0 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 15 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 15 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (vph) 15 C (m) (vph) 474 /c 0.03 95% queue length 0.10 Control Delay 12.8 LOS B pproach Delay -- -- 12.8 pproach LOS -- -- B Rights Reserved file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 12/15/2005 Two-Way Stop Control 0 • Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information 11 1 mi n c rn oA%// AAA1Ai Analyst RP Intersection """- ' " I/ I"I„JIV DRIVE Agency/Co. GCC Jurisdiction FDOT Date Performed 1211512005 sis Year Anal 2007 WITH PROJECT y nTime Period PM PEAK Project Description East/West Street: GULF TO BAY North/South Street: MAIN DRIVEWAY Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 2489 30 54 2118 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 2620 31 56 2229 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH I Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 24 0 59 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 25 0 62 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Len th Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 56 87 Capacity, cm (vph) 108 89 /c ratio 0.52 0.98 Queue length (95%) 2.37 5.59 file://C:\Documents%20and%20 Settings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 12/15/2005 Two-Way Stop Control 0 0 Page 2 of 2 Control Delay s/veh 69.7 173.9 LOS F F pproach delay s/veh 173.9 pproach LOS -- -- F HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 12/15/2005 Two-Way Stop Control 0 Is Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY IrZonarni Infnrmnfinn Site Information GULF TO BAY/EAST Analyst RP Intersection DRIVE Agency/Co. GCC urisdiction FDOT Date Performed 1211512005 sis Year Anal 2007 WITH PROJECT ,Analysis Time Period PM PEAK y Project Description East/West Street: GULF TO BAY North/South Street: EAST DRIVEWAY Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 2542 6 28 2159 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 2675 6 29 2272 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 -- -- 2 -- -- Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration T R L T U stream Sign al 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 13 0 30 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 13 0 31 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Len th Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 29 44 Capacity, cm (vph) 152 75 /c ratio 0.19 0.59 Queue lenath (95%) 0.68 2.56 file://C:\Documents%20and%20S ettings\rpergolizzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 12/15/2005 Two-Way Stop Control 0 Page 2 of 2 Control Delay s/veh 34.2 106.0 LOS D F Approach delay s/veh 106.0 pproach LOS -- -- F HCS2000TM Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\rpergolizzi.GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k4... 12/15/2005 0 0 64 100 2 a cc 80 D O S Y Q W Z 60 W z CC. ?- 40 S C7 cc 20 NOTE: For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, \ peak hour right turns greater than 40 vph, and total peak hour approach less than 300 vph, adjust right turn volumes. Adjust peak hour right turns = Peak hour right turns -.20 100 200 300 400 500 600 TOTAL PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME (VPH) 120 a 100 FULL-WIDTH TURN LANE > Cr O V1 = 80 Y TAPER Z co 60 cc D S 0 cc 40 RADIUS 4 - LANE HIGHWAYS 700 20 NOTE: For application on high. speed. highways 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 TOTAL PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME (VPH) Figure 4-23. Traffic volume guidelines for design of right-turn lanes. (Source: Ref. 4-11) 1.35? U.r,rrr+,A0_k oft UNIUNAL RECEIVED Amok o? JUL 212006 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA d CITY OF CLEARWATER 4 JAM .tea g ;01rM _.?,_._ 2_2002 2533' ' 02-123 CO 6K 11 1U?II?llt1111 MDR?tD -..?.._ P INELUSS _._..........._ t1?11111111111111t111111111111111 . FEES.. _ MTF REV m INGRESS AND EGRESS kA$EMENT 4C177205 04-02-2002 17:01:42 NDK 51 EA5-RALPH W.ERT TTFAAPPY TRAILS 039082 1#:02123161 DK:11922 SPG:2533 EPG:NO RECORDING 000 PAGES 1 $37.50 RECORD FEES 9 $5.00 TOTAL: $42.50 DECK ANT.TENDERED: $42.50 CHANGE: $.00 BY DEPilTY CLERK THIS EASEMENT, (the "Agreement', is made-titis -A?-=- day of March, 2002, by and between RALPH A. ENGLERT, as Trustee of the Jean C. Englert I e ocable Trust Agreement dated August 19,1971, as amended, as to an undivided 32.50% interest, whose •post office address is 1324 Isle of Sky Court, Dunedin, Florida 34698; JEAN C. ENGLERT, as Trustee of the Ralph A. Englert Revocable Trust Agreement dated August 19, 1971, as amended, as to an undivided 32.561% iiiiterest, whose post office address is 1324 Isle of Sky Court, Dunedin, Florida 34698; GEORGE BRUNING, as Trustee of the George Bruning Revocable Living Trust dated October 19, 1984, as to an undivided,.. 17'5.01W interest, whose post office address is 2388 Nash Street, Clearwater, Florida 33765; and GEORGIA VIRENA LEONARD, as Successor Trustee under the Eva Bruning Revocable Living Trust dated October 19, 1984,`as,to an undivided 17.50% interest, whose post office address is 9523 Edmund Drive, St. Louis, Missouri `63:104; ?(collectively "Grantor"), and HAPPY TRAILS MOBILE HOME PARK, LLC, a Florida limited,liabtlity company, whose post office address is 370 East Maple Road, 31 Floor, Birmingham, Michigan 48009, `Crartted` RECITALS A. By warranty deedadated'of even date herewith, Grantor is conveying to Grantee fee simple title to that certain real property commonly ls?own as Happy Trails Mobile Home Park, having a street address of 2261 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33..765 ("Grantee's Property"), which is more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part-hereof. B. Grantor is,retaming title to and is the fee simple owner of a certain parcel of land adjoining Grantee's Property on the North as ritoreparticularly described on Exhibit attached hereto and made apart hereof ("Grantor's Property") C. As condition of the Grantor's sale of Grantee's Property to Grantee, Grantee has requested and Grantor has agreed to.:gtatit an ingress and egress easement over, across and through that portion of Grantor's Property describabn Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof ("Easement Area"). NOW, THE REFORE, in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) paid to Grantor herewith, and ofthe benefits-?o be:derived herefrom, the receipt and adequacy ofwhich are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby-•agree'ag-follows: '-.. 1. .Grantor hereby grants to Grantee an easement for vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress over, across, through and upon the Easement Area described on Exhibit C attached hereto (the "Easement"). 2. The easement shall be a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for the benefit of Grantee and the current and future users of Grantee's Property, including„ without limitation, Grantee, Grantee's mortgagees, Grantee's tenants, and all of their employees, agents, customers, invitees and contractors and shall run with the land and benefit the Grantee's Property and burden the Grantor's Property until terminated by the parties or their successors and assigns. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Grantor shall have the right, at Grantor's sole cost and expense, upon not less than ninety (90) days prior written notice to Grantee, which notice shall include a legal description of the FLgg34 p INELLRS COUNT" OFF .REC •SK 11922 PG relocated Easement Area and a survey thereof, to relocate the Easemeni':Area to another location reasonably acceptable to Grantee, provided that: (a) the relocated Easement Areiis-of at least equal size to the Easement Area; (b) the relocated Easement Area provides access from Gulf-to-Bay:Bouievaidl to the Grantee's Property in a manner which is not materially different as provided on the date hereof; (c) Gjintor shall, at Grantor's sole cost and expense, make the same improvements as were located on the Easement Area and install the Grantee's signage thereon prior to the relocation occurring; and (d) the parties shall enter into:an ameztdment to this Easement Agreement changing the location of the Easement Area. 3. Grantee shall have the right to construction j-mt int a sign on the Easement Area in the location of the currently existing sign for the mobile home park- located lydrantor's Property and of a size not larger than said current sign. Should Grantor desire to erect a new.sigi .od Grantor's Property, then Grantee's sign may be replaced by Grantor and made a part of the new sign; prbvi6d the size and content of Grantee's sign remain substantially the same as currently exist. 4. Each party shall at all times maintain a policy of liability insurance for damage or injury to persons or property in an amount not less than $500,000 pet occurrence and $1,000,000 in the aggregate. Grantor shall require any contractors erecting improvements on Granter's property to maintain liability insurance during the course oftheir construction and to provide a copy of suc$..insurauce to Grantee upon its request. 5. Neither party hereto, nor any person claiming by, through or under such party, shall have any right to construct any buildings or improvements on. ffie Easement Area which would materially and adversely interfere with the rights conferred hereunder: l:n, the . exit of the violation of this provision by either party hereto, the non- breaching party shall have the right t6 obia.ifi, injunctive relief from such violation in addition to any other rights or remedies such party may have at-law or. -m equity. 6. Grantee shall have the, right to mortgage or encumber its rights under this Agreement and in connection therewith Grant6r;5hali execute such document or documents as may be reasonably required by such mortgagee. Grantee shalt reimbrirse Grantor for reasonable attorney's fees for reviewing any such document submitted. 7. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 8. Tbis.Agreement may be executed in several counterparts and shall be deemed one integrated document whelp all such counterpart signature and acknowledgment pages are attached. IN. W fCi? ESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this document as of the day and year first above written. Signed- : sealed amd delivered in our presence: Cw?2 A61 I AA wi ess- witne - "GRANTOR": RALPJ4 A. ENGLERT, as T,Pstee of the Jean C. Englert Revocable Trust AgreemelA dated August 19,1971, as amended ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL- 212006 -2- PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED PIN LLRS Cp922 P3 2535 JUL 21 200 OFF RFr.BK wi ss - with s - PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER C. FWGLER a ustee of the Ralph A. Englert Revocable"Trust Agreement dated August 19,1971, as amended: J 94" BRUNING, as Trustee ofthe George Bruning Rev'bcable Living Trust dated October 19, 1984 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The Foregoing Instrument was ackn6wIedjj?0` before me this day of 2002, by RALPH A. ENGLERT, as Trustee of the Jean-C, Enjle_rt Revocable Trust Agreement dated August 19,1971, as amended, and by JEAN C. ENGLERT, as Trustee ofthe Ralph A. Englert Revocable Trust Agreement dated August 19, 1971, as amended, each of whoM'-DC`is-personally known tome or[ ] has produced as identification. 'Arhol P No Iblic [AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL] My Commission Expires: ~?. 7otn C: Gardner MY COMMMION # DD092760 EXPIRES Febmry 17, 2006 . 00??tfBk! iROYNYN RIStIRANCE, BiC , STATE OF )i LORIDA'j COUNTY: OE`PINELLAS Rj The Fareg'dijg..Idstrument was acknowledged before me this ? day of A 2002, by GEORGE BRUNING,a?Trustee of the George Bruning Revocable Living Trust dated October 19, 1984, who is persoally.]cz own to me or [ ] has produced rip A as identification. A /I f4 No Public __f [AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL] My Commission Expires:,7ohnC Gardner MYCOMMrMN# DDD92760 EXPIRES February 17, 2006 BOMiMTW FliHW"RAtK W- ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 P INELLAS COUNTY pa 25 PLANNING DEPARTMENT OFF. REC 922 pK..>• CITY OF CLEARWATER witne?/ GEORt . -Y-.. WENA LEONARD, as Successor Trustee under the Eva Bruning Revocable Living Trust dated Oct5>tier"4;9,1984 witness - STATE OF MISSOURI - Q*+1V-OF ST. LOUIS The Foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this `kday of March, 2002, by GEORGIA VIRENA LEONARD, as Successor Trustee underr the Eva Brunin Revocable Living Trust dated October 19, 1984, who [ ] is personally known to me or E:sr]ias produced fl)LQm p Q j 6 rt Vf- f S Li C2n Z. as identification. Kathy Bowley ' Notary Public-No(ary-Seal'; State of Missouri No Publi St. Louis County.'-:. [AFFIX i irat,' Mary M; Q005 My Commission Expires: S-C5Z/-o?C'X0-S -4- ORIGINAL RECEIVED witness - witness - STATE OF 1h161)14Q1i COUNTY OF ?VtVIW PINELLPS COUNTY FLR. OFF . REC ;8K .11922 PG 2537 JUL 21 PLANNING D CITY OF CL ..:"GRANTEE": HAPY TRAILS MOBILE HOME PARK, LLC, a-T-1oriita Litaiiited Liability Company A 2006 EPARTMENT EARWATER The Fore ping Instrument was acknowledged before me this i day of 2402, by AAV as u70I'% /? of HA YTRAILSMOBILEHOIY,.IRPAI K;PLC,aFloridaLimitedLiability Company, on behalf of said Company. He [ is personally known to me, oc - hai6roduced as identification. otary is My Commission Expires: GWELYN MARIENUCKOLS Notary Public, Oakland County, MI My Commission Expires 5126/2105 -5- P INELL SS COUNTY FLP. OFF. REC . SK 11522 PG 25SB ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 EXHIBIT "A" - GRANTEE'S' Pk0P%RTY LEGAL DESCRIPTI.Ot PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Commence at the Northwest corner of the Northwest 14 - thin Southwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida; theriee 989°47'09" E, along the centerline of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, a distance of 653.00 feet; thence lea-.giqg Sa d-6enterline, S 00°05'20" W, 318.65 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence from said Point of Beginning the following four (4) courses: 1) S 89°47'09" E, 299.16 feet; thence 2) S 00°16'03" W, 963.47 feet, to the North right-of-Way line of Druid Road; thence 3) along said right-of-way line, N 89°53'19" W, 296.16 feet; thence 4) leaving said right-of-way line, N 00°05'2*0" -,E' 964:00 feet, to the aforementioned Point of Beginning. ' ., p LNELl.SS C004" Ft.R . OFF .RED .8K t 1922 PG 2539 ORIGINAL RECEIVED EXHIBIT "B" - GRANTOR'S:.. PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIP'T'ION JUL 21 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Commence at the Northwest comer of the Nvflhwest.,1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas' County;*;.Florida; thence S 89°47'09" E, along the centerline of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, a distance of 788.00 feet; thence leaving said centerline, S 00°05'20" W, 50.00 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of said Gulf to Bay Boulevard, also being the Point ofBeginning; thence from said Point of Beginning the following six (6) courses: 1) along said South right-of-way line, S -89°4T09" E, 155.00 feet; 2) leaving said South right-of-way Iirie;-S.,.0 O°16'03" W, 268.65 feet; 3) N 89°47'09" W, 299.16 feet; thehpe,... 4) N 00°05'20" E, 108.65 feet; thence.. 5) S 89°47'09" E, 145.00 feet; thence.. ' . 6) N 00°05'20" E, 160.00 fee.L'tts;-fhe aforementioned Point of Beginning. P INELLPS COUNTY FLS. OFF,REC .BK 11922 PG 2540 EXHIBIT "C" - EASEMENT AAA LEGAL DESCRIPTIPN Commence at the Northwest corner of the Northwe$t 1-14-wf the Southwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida; thericeg'89°47'09" E, along the centerline of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, a distance of 653.00 feet; thence loa zng:sald centerline, S 00°05'20" W, 318.65 feet; thence S 89°47'09" E, 135.21 feet to the Point of gegiiiriing; thence from said Point of Beginning the following five (5) courses: 1) N 24°45'12" E, 23.46 feet; thence 2) N 00°05'20" E, 247.31 feet to a point ozl.'tl a :South right-of-way line of said Gulf to Bay Boulevard; thence 3) Along said right-of-way line, S 89°41'09",E?`- 6,87 feet; thence 4) leaving said right-of-way line, S 0000570" W 268.65 feet; thence 5) N 89°47;09 W, 36.66 feet, to the aforementioned Point of Beginrin "- ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER This ` *[ Warrnct,7 'red 1`'lade the 29th ac.:o.' A. D. 153 by Fir- ipital Income Pror.:rties, Ltd. - Series a Floi a limited partnership, hereinafter called the grantor, to Ellis & Co., Ltd., a,Florida limited partnership, °5672 PACE S42 Whose postof fice address is 116 South Pinellas Avenue, Tarpon Springs, Florida 33589 hereinafter called the grantee; (wh and hrrr;n hr r m: '`gran nr" nd `'grantee" dude ell the parties to ,his 'ns ument and the heir., legs{ rep,-,.d- and n..igm of mdicid..h, and ,he u.eueon and assigns of corpon,ions) 01 1 40 Pin 41 DS 13 int Tot ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER d ? i sis M n C13 L rD i c`Dotr p Y, -! w zE:i tpn Lu =o ti cn-? z ? J w 7 U D J iUlt( Meth: That the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $ 10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, re- mises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in County, Florida, viz: See Legal Description Attached Hereto And Made A:,,. Part Hereof As Exhibit "A". Subject to: CLFkX ' - IT INQ1 e0uh 1. Taxes and assessments for .198.4 and subsequent years; ? 30 9 183 2. Applicable zoning rules, regulations and ordinances; 3. Easements, limitations, conditions and restrictions of record, if any, without intent to reimpose or reinstate same hereby. 4. Mortgage of record in.favor of Atlantic Federal Savings and Loan Association of Ft. Lauderdale, dated December 3, 1976, recorded in Official Records Book 4494, Page 16, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, which grantee assumes and agrees to pay. 0 ® ?a1..j S 0,00 15 1;5767:.; z4 Documentary Tax Pd. $, • • • • • • " " 4 , . $..... • .............. Intangible Tax Pd. ki 12.. '150 I:ail De 6laker, Clerk,.Pinellas County T03Y,! '1.•' . 1 a=:' . ?? . Q U 1 10? .. 1?:......... Deputy Clerk 'Together, with 'all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any- wise appertaining. 'To Have and to Mold, the same in fee simple forever, 7lnd the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and here- by warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under the said grantor. In VitaCSS Whereof, the said grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. First Capital Income Properties, Ltd. - Series II, a Florida limited partnership, igned, sealed and deliv red i our presence: by its Managing General Partner] Capital Properties Corporation,,a,..•. ............ ....................... .. --- •. . ..... .................... Florida co po at ............ . ................................................ By: ` (witn ssers) - - dwa d S. Tables, Vice ?dert. STATE OF FLO DA, 1 COUNTY OF Dade S I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, befbrc me, an officer duly authorized in the State aforesaid and in the County aforesaid, to take acknowledgments, personally appeared Edward S. Tables, Vice President of First Capital Properties Corporation, a Florida corporation, Managing General Partner of First Capital Income Properties, Ltd. - Series II, a Florida limited partnership to me known to. be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged before me that he executed the same. official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this dad 'df°•., WITNESS my hand and 29th December 83 A. D. 19 Notar PutiI'ic" ' °°-""""".""• I My commission expires: NOT`ki PUBLIC STATE CF FI.CRI1D:4:.;4.T LA8G5 T/ns IiIJ11-111Jri'711 r,' arrel 1, John C. Sumberg, Esq. MY COMM15510N E,"PIRRFS `!OV 25.1x35 RuZn( Baum Levin Constant Friedman & Bilzin PONDED. IH°U GENERAL INS. litdUE;W;;I, xS Address 1201 Brickell Avenue, Suite 314 Miami, Florida 33131 AIL that --i twin piece, parcel r- ct__oF land .situate, 1 and being in Pinelle & . orida, moreparticularlylxjunded and descri '-j as toiloas: V.. ?. 5672. PAGE C43 That part of the Northwest Quarter (IsU ,1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section Eighteen (18), Tb:•;n- ship 'Aventy-Nine (29) South, Range Sixteen (16) East described as folla.vs: Beginnirr3 at the North%-.est (1\11) corner of the A'orthwest Quarter (91 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter.(S:a 1/4) of Section Eighteen (18), Township Twenty- ni.ne (29) South, Range Sixteen (16) East, which is also the intersection of the center line of Belcher Road and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and run thence South 89° 43' 00" East Six Hundred and Fifty-three (653) feet along the East and (east center line which is also the center line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard to a point Sir. Hundred Seventeen and Si)..ty-seven hundredths (617.67) feet i•lest of the Northeast (NM) corner of the Forth,,.est Quarter (N:7 1/4) of the South%est Quarter (SW 1/4) of said Section Eighteen; run thence South 00` 05` 02" Viest Six Hundred sixty-seven and Seventy-seven hundredths (667.77) feet; run thence forth 89° 42' 55" {Jest Six Hundred Forty-vine and Ninety- Four nundredths (649.94) feet to the West line of said Section Eighteen (18), which is also the center line of Belcher Road; thence run North 00 10' 41" Pest along said. West line of Section Eighteen (18) (being also the center line of Belcher Road) a distance of Six Hundred Sixty-SL-ven and seventy-seven hundredths (667.77) feet rrcore or less to the point of beginning; subject to the right of way of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard over the North Fifty (50) feet of said tract ant subject to the right of way of Belcher Road over the est Thirty-Three (33) feet of said tract. Less additional right-of-vay for Belcher Roa3 widening, further described as follocr,: A part of the tNd 1/4 of the SZ1 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, R_nGe 16 East: From the NW corner of the S9 1/4 of said Section 18, run along the nest boundary thereof, S 0° 09' 35'• ,ast 667.77 fee'; th^nce S 89° 40' 55" E, 33.00 feet to the P.L.B., from the P.O.B. run parallel to the West boundary of said Section 18, and 33.00 feet therefrom N 0° 09' 35" W, 617.77 feet to the intersection of the rights-of-way of Belcher Roa3 (County Road 27) and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (State Road 60) ; thence by the right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, S 890 40' S5'' E, 28.00 feet; thence S 45° 04' 09" West 35.20 feet; thence parallel to the aforementioned Vest boundary of Section 18 and 36.00 feet therefrom South 0° 09' 35" E,. 592.77 feet; thence N 89° 40' 55" W, 3.00 feet to the P.O.B. Together with all improvements, buildings and structures now or hereafter located thereon. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Exhibit "A" ?? bry i? • t• Lam' Prepared by and return to: Donald R. Hall Attorney at Law Goza and Hall, P.A. 28050 U.S. Hwy. 19 N., Suite 402 Clearwater, FL 33761 1 C;.' (L- S-14?) File Number: 6299-H-5 Will Call No.: Above This Line For Recording • KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2006049259 0210912005 at 08:36 AM OFF REC BK: 14109 PG: 1689-1591 DocType:DEED RECORDING: $27.00 D DOC STAMP: $7000.00 lL ;...r G Warranty Deed 4- This Warranty Deed made this ? day of February, 2005 between G2B Development, LLC, a Florida limited liability company whose post office address is 309 Harbor Dr., Belleair Beach, FL 33786, grantor, and Ellis & Co., Ltd., a Florida limited partnership whose post office address is P.O. Box 1879, Tarpon Springs, FL 34688, grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees) Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100'DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof; Parcel Identification Number: 18/29/16/00000/320/1210 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2004. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DnuhteTimee In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: G2B Devel e t, LC, a Florida limited liability company By Mana er Witnes ame: a?llia? Robert Szadd Witness Name: i--??t 1--??-lr'+?CSY? (Corporate Seal) State of Florida County of Pinellas The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Janu=y, 2005 by Robert Szasz, Manager of G2B Development, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the corporation. He/she [_] is personally known to me or [X] has produced a driver's license as identification. [Notary Seal] Gire9Ory A. FOX Notary Public t: Commission # 00338456 Expires August 5, 2008 .701B Printed Name: ??,Fj? Bonded Troy Fain .lrtsureno°, My Commission Expires: 12006 wl?lvuvv UEPAR7MENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Double'rime® Exhibit "A" Commence at the Northwest comer of the Northwest 114 of the Southwest 114 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida; thence South 89° 47'09" East, along the centerline of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, a distance of 798 feet; thence leaving said centerline, South 00° 05'20' West, 50.00 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of said Gulf to Bay Boulevard, also tieing the Point of Beginning; thence from said Point of Beginning the following six (6) courses: 1) along said South right-of-way line, South 89° 47'09" East, 155.00 feet; 2) leaving said South right-of-way line, South 00° 16' 03" West, 268.65 feet; 3) North 89° 47' 09" West, 299.16 feet; thence 4) North 00" 05'20" East, 108.65 feet; thence 5) South 89° 47' 09" East, 145.00 feet; thence 6) North 00 05'2V East, 160.00 feet, to the aforementioned Point of Beginning. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER y Prepared by and return to: Donald R. Hall Attorney at Law Goza and Hall, P.A. 28050 U.S. Hwy. 19 N., Suite 402 Clearwater, FL 33761 File Number: 6299-H-6 Will Call No.: Above This Line For Recording Warranty Deed KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2005049250 02/09/2005 at 08:32 AM OFF REC BK: 14109 PG: 1535-1537 DocType:DEED RECORDING: $27.00 D DOC STAMP: $6650,00 This Warranty Deed made this s?? day of jd_,ia,0Zq , 2005 between Belcher & Gulf to Bay, Inc., a Florida corporation whose post office address is 241 No. Unive • ity Drive, Pembroke Pines, FL 33024, grantor, and Ellis & Co., Ltd., a Florida limited partnership whose post office address is P.O. Box 1879, Tarpon Springs, FL 34688, grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees) Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND N01100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof; Parcel Identification Number: 18/29/16/00000/320/0300 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2004. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 21 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER (0C0F?A-lfA (\ J nnithlaTimPm • In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: 0. State of Florida County of s 3/? m Ct,-,,q/y 0 Belcher & Gulf to Bay, Inc., a Florida corporation By: G-c cam. Si ney A. S dow, Presid nt (Corporate Seal) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this4ay of aR, 2005 by Sidney A. Sandow, President of Belcher & Gulf to Bay, Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporae/she [_] is personally known to me or [X] has produced a driver's license as identification. /? [Notary Seal] Notary Public , Printed Name: E-. ff My Commission Expires: AUHItNNt AMUN * * MY COMMISSION # DD 296423 EXPIRES: July 4, 2008 Bonged Ttn Budget Notary Servkes ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Exhibit "A" Begin at the Northwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, and run thence South 89°41'18" East along the quarter section line 653.00 feet; thence South 0° 0520" West, 50.0 feet for Point of Beginning; thence continue South 0°05'20" West 160.0 feet; thence South 89° 41'18" East 145.0 feet; thence North 0°05'20" East 160.00 feet; thence North 89°41'18" West along the Southerly line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard 145.0 feet to the Point of. Beginning; all lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida. Y 1 I lORIGINAL - RECEIVED JUL 212000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • FLS2005-120'7'o` 501- 525 S BELCHER RD Date Received: 12/08/2005 GULF TO BAY PLAZA ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 299A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW CLWCoverSheet Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Copley Design [copleydesign@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 4:17 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Gulf to Bay Plaza Retail A sidewalk Wayne, Could you please review the attached pdf to verify that the sidewalk along McCabe's is what you are expecting. We have widened the planter to 7', extended it closer to the drive-through, and have allowed for accessibility around the ramp and door. I will make any necessary adjustments you may need and submit the revised drawings for formal review. I am hoping that when you receive the formal review set, the sidewalk will be what you need and it can be approved without further revision. Northside will provide the calculations for green space within their drawing package. They should be submitting the entire package as requested. Thanks, Drew Copley Copley Design Associates, Inc. 1666 Laney Drive Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 P- 727-787-2840 F- 727-785-4017 copleydesign a tampabay.rr.com 3/16/2007 y ? j j wl f ? 4 Page 1 of 1 1 & 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:44 PM To: 'Copley Design' Subject: RE: Concrete +Planters+Wausau+Tile+Pavers,Terrazzo+Tile,+Concrete+Planters,+Benches,Tables, +Wast Drew - I brought your newest proposal to a staff meeting today with other planners and Planning management regarding the issue of the foundation landscaping for Retail A at this shopping center. It is your proposal to provide planters in lieu of, or as an alternative to, the foundation landscaping shown on the approved landscape plans under BCP2006-09259. Based on Code requirements and the implementation of foundation landscaping at other locations, we cannot approve your request. There are still the two alternative locations we have offered in the past for the required foundation landscaping: 1. adjacent to the building as shown on the approved landscape plan; or 2. moved away from the building but between the sidewalk in front of the Retail A tenants and the parking spaces that abut the north side of Retail A. I would be willing to review any proposed revisions to the landscape plan prior to submission as an amendment to BCP2006-09259. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Copley Design [mai Ito: copleydesign @tampa bay. rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:54 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Concrete+ Pla nters+Wa usau +Tile+ Pavers,Terrazzo+Tile, +Concrete+ Planters,+ Benches,Ta bles, +Waste+Co Wayne, Please find Wausau Tile link below. This should take you to a sample of the planters we are proposing to be located in front of the columns along the small retail stores along Gulf to Bay Blvd. The color and style will be selected to match the architectural style and colors of the buildings. Again, the reason for not installing at grade planters along the sidewalk/parking lot edge is the concern for safety for pedestrian traffic coming from the parking lot. It is simply not a good design practice for this particular layout. Also the door/storefronts are modular units allowing the tenant to more door/ window locations within the proposed opening to fit their interior store layout. Permanent planting areas in the sidewalk would not allow for this option. The planter "pots" we are proposing will be located in front of the columns eliminating both problems as outlined above and will provide move vertical height with colorful interesting planters with either a small tree/topiary and vines hanging over the edge. These planters can also be coordinated with other amenities such as benches, litter receptacles to help unify the architecture at the site. Please review and comment. Please note that the at-grade planters along the Publix side (west side) are to remain as shown on the drawing I presented to you a week or so ago. Thanks, Drew Copley http://www.wai sautile.com/index.cfin/choice/TerraForm/productdetail/y/thumbnail/WT636/id/22/ 1/14/2007 .r * A 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Copley Design [copleydesign@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:54 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Concrete+Planters+Wausau+Tile+Pavers,Terrazzo+Tile,+Concrete+Planters,+Benches,Tables,+Wast Wayne, Please find Wausau Tile link below. This should take you to a sample of the planters we are proposing to be located in front of the columns along the small retail stores along Gulf to Bay Blvd. The color and style will be selected to match the architectural style and colors of the buildings. Again, the reason for not installing at grade planters along the sidewalk/parking lot edge is the concern for safety for pedestrian traffic coming from the parking lot. It is simply not a good design practice for this particular layout. Also the door/storefronts are modular units allowing the tenant to more door/ window locations within the proposed opening to fit their interior store layout. Permanent planting areas in the sidewalk would not allow for this option. The planter "pots" we are proposing will be located in front of the columns eliminating both problems as outlined above and will provide move vertical height with colorful interesting planters with either a small tree/topiary and vines hanging over the edge. These planters can also be coordinated with other amenities such as benches, litter receptacles to help unify the architecture at the site. Please review and comment. Please note that the at-grade planters along the Publix side (west side) are to remain as shown on the drawing I presented to you a week or so ago. Thanks, Drew Copley httt •//www wausautile comlindex cf nlchoice/TerraForm/productdetailly/thumbnailIWT636/id/221produ( 1/11/2007 . - Concrete Planters Wausau Tile R&vers,Terrazzo Tile, Concrete Planters, B&nches,Tables, ... Page 1 of 2 New Products New Products RRf WWrft! M?atalll&it? Euc9FA?1l?5 e S RAJ c . ,,^n_,«_,.ro __ i^e S? kptmff m-" s Site Furnishings S&Uylfv Tn Di TerrF 9 Precast Concrete Precast Concrete Terrazzo Tile Terrazzo Tile Precast Terrazzo Precast Terrazzo Commemorative Giftin Cur 11"Ni"'I&A" re R agis tistl4mU Llnk_s_ Ai6kikl6ris/ Links R4 -V#l,e 11 LeI CContac'r r. CUs Re ai a- Center Home Contact Us Featured Projects Home Site Mao Featured Projects Site Map SITE FURNISHINGS - Concrete Planters Waste Containers Concrete Planters Concrete Tables I Concrete Benches Concrete Snuffers Concrete Bollards Concrete Sins I Concrete PIla round Equipment Famil Grou?ngs Custom Banding par-_A _Accessories uick Ship P_roqramI Literature Planters : Round Planters - Small Choose from classic to whimsical styles to fit your landscape or mood. TF4228 Description: Westlake I design Size: 24" dia. X 26" Unit Weight/Unit Capacity: 330 tbs. Available Colors: (Colors are approximate, select an image below for a more detailed image.) -61 B2 B3 84 .r BS 86 B7 B8 (Colors are approximate, select your color choice from the pulldown menu below to add to your uote request. B1 - Weatherstone [Gray] Specifications: You must be a registered user to download this product's specifications in either of the file types listed below. Click here if you have not yet registered. Download specs as PDF tt anM?I Adobe ]J Add Product to Quote Request http://www.wausautile.com/i ndex. cfm/choice/TerraForm/productdetail/y/thumbnail/WT63... 1/11/2007 Product Quick Search I Site Map Featured Projects I Contact us Concrete Planters Wausau Tile s ,Terrazzo Tile, Concrete Planters, Benches,Tables, ... Page 2 of 2 ir • 1-800-388-8728 Copyright 2007 Wausau Tile, Inc. All Rights R http://www. wausautile.comlindex. cfmlchoice/TerraFormlproductdetaillylthumbnail/WT63 ... 1/11/2007 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 8:10 AM To: 'copleydesign@tampabay.rr.com' Subject: Gulf to Bay Plaza Landscaping Drew - This email is a follow-up to our meeting on December 14 and my phone conversation with Marian last week regarding the Gulf to Bay Plaza landscaping. I spoke to the other planners and Planning management regarding the issue of the foundation landscaping for Retail A at this shopping center. It was your request to eliminate the foundation landscaping, but push the landscaping for such to the interior and/or perimeter landscaping along the north side of the parking area north of Retail A. Based on Code requirements and the implementation of foundation landscaping at other locations, we cannot approve your request. There are two alternative locations for the required foundation landscaping: 1. adjacent to the building as shown on the approved landscape plan; or 2. moved away from the building but between the sidewalk in front of the Retail A tenants and the parking spaces that abut the north side of Retail A. I would be willing to review any proposed revisions to the landscape plan prior to submission as an amendment to BCP2006-09259. Wayne 0 0 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PI.ANNING DEPARTMENT -? Q''Posr 0,:,--,c,--I Box 4748, Cu?xvrnrE:k FLORIDA 33758-4748 A'r ?'-71 , ,0'0MUNICIPAL SERVICE'S BUILDING, 100 Sou'ri-i Mvl?-ru: Avev(A--, CLT nRWn rF.R, FLURID.A 33756 'I'ELITFIONF (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PI ANNING Drvla.oPME-Yr Ri-Nim September 1, 2006 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order for Case No. FLS2005-12098 501 - 525 South Belcher Road Dear Ms. Williams: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On January 5, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for (1) Flexible Standard Development approval to permit retail sales and services in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height of an additional 7.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck - roof deck at 24-foot height) and an additional 14.17 feet for architectural embellishments, under the provisions of Section 2-703.R; (2) vacation of a 10-foot wide utility easement; and (3) the reduction to interior landscaping from 10 to nine percent of the vehicular use area, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Retail Sales and Services criteria under the provisions of Section 2- 703.R; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the vacation of the 10-foot wide utility easement be approved by City Council; FlI %Nn I IIIMUM, ?NIAMIN ?uii? Ik,rn , OA M 11Nil:w+i:11, I IMI I I\\111:1()\, Cc,ruai.Nil.NlI :R C.\Ri r.\ A. PI:I iiRsr', 0)l mlloir:\nirr rn r: A( I H )N I•:,\lPL()1 ?[R„ • September 1, 2006 Williams - Page 2 • 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records, with a copy of the recorded document submitted to the Planning Department. 4. That Lease Areas #1 and #2 meet all Code requirements, including, but not limited to, FAR, ISR, parking, loading, traffic circulation, landscaping, dumpster access, etc.; 5. That a Comprehensive Sign Program be approved for the entire shopping center, including Lease Areas #1 and #2; 6. That all on-site utilities be underground, with the exception of the overhead lines along the south property line to the south of Retail A; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the location of parking lot lighting meet Code and be coordinated with site landscaping to avoid shielding of lighting by existing or future tree canopy; 8. That, prior to the issuance of building permits, screening of mechanical equipment be shown on plans; 9. That, prior to the issuance of building permits, dumpster enclosures be constructed of the same materials, and painted the same, as the building; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, plans be revised to remove the 'RIBBON' tree barricade detail; 11. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant obtain a FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the State right-of-way and a Pinellas County permit for work in County right- of-way; 12. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a letter from FDOT be submitted indicating closing of the median opening on Gulf to Bay Boulevard nearest Belcher Road north of this property is not necessary; and 13. That any future compactor dumpster units be approved by the Director of Solid Waste prior to their installation. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above three conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received August 16 and August 30, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (September 1, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. r September 1, 2006 Williams - Page 3 In addition, in accordance with Section 4-502.A, please be aware that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by the applicant or a property owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The Community Development Board (CDB) would hear an appeal application. The appeal period for your case will expire on September 8, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727- 562-4504. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Mic el elk, A - Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartnaentlC D BlFlez Standard (FLS)I/nactive or Finished CasesWelcher 501-525 Gul to Bay Plaza (C) - ApprovedlBelcher 501-525 FLS2005-12098 Development Order.doc Horthsiie ?August 25, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLS2005-12098 Gulf to Bay Plaza. - 570 Dear Mr. Wells: ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 3 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Listed below are our responses to the outstanding comments dated August 24, 2006. LANDSCAPE: 1. Foundation landscaping on the northwest side of Retail A has been increased to 7' with a reduction of the sidewalk to 5'. Retail "A" foundation landscaping has been redesigned to include trees and to not block signage. SOLID WASTE: 1. The compactor for Retail `B' has been removed and a dumpster will be replacing since a tenant has not been leased this space. TRAFFIC: 1. See Sheet C3.1 showing truck traveling westbound on Gulf to Bay turning into Plaza. 2. See Sheet C3.1, crosswalk marking have been revised and the word "STOP" along Belcher has been removed. ZONING: 1. See attached floor plan showing storage area. Also, revised parking demand narrative is attached. I hope this concludes comments in regards to this project. Please issue our Development Order at your earliest convenience so we may obtain building permits. incerely, _ 1 0 Noreen A. Williams Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STRF- ET, CLEARWA-FER. FLORIDA NE5ADMIN,??,MINDSPR1NG i_C N ESTECH1,,TMI NDSPR I NG-C.C:; 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 8036 ``.r? C_IVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • f • • ORIGINAL. RECEIVE[ AUG 3o 2006 Gulf to Bay Plaza 'AANNING DEPARTMENT FLS2006-12098 Clio OF GLEARWATER PARKING DEMAND STUDY The request is for a reduction in parking from 438 required spaces (5 spaces / 1,000 gsf) to 404 spaces. The required 438 parking spaces required are per the City of Clearwater Code requirements. In researching the Urban Planner's Association guidelines, it has been determined that 4 spaces per thousand would be adequate for a shopping center. The site will consist of a Publix grocery store and several retail centers. The hours of the grocery store will run from 7:00 a.m. through 11:00 p.m.. Many of the retail centers will operate between the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The customer's visiting the grocery store, if they are in need to visit one of the retail centers will do so at the same time. The grocery store, although their hours of operation is 7 am to 11 pm will not have 100% occupancy at all times of operating hours. Many customers do work during the day and will be shopping after the hours of 6:00 p.m. when the retail centers will be closing. The parking throughout the shopping center will be shared with all tenants. Also, there is no guarantee that all the retail spaces will be leased. The site also has a mobile home park behind the center and across the street. Many of these patrons will not be arriving by vehicle, but walking. The flexibility criteria for a parking reduction states "the use of significant portions of the building to be used for storage or other non parking demand-generated purposes. " In calculating the storage area, coolers in freezers within the redevelopment, it has been calculated that in order for a reduction of 34 parking spaces, we would need to have at least 6,800 square feet of "non parking demand-generated space. Publix has a total of 7,556 square feet of non parking demand-generated space consisting of storage, coolers and freezers. In this calculation, 7,556 square feet equals 38 parking spaces. rxc. EXIT 5 5 ?` ' { ._._.-- sgp -- •_- -------- - - ---- .a hero a° ?, - -- - --- ----- --------- _ _ o giD IRE. I-- T 'T MIR r. - T? - p r --------------------------- I--------_ ._-------- ----?:,-y.kJ I ? `I? i m i m I i m i I I I p f- I I ? I I i I ? .[P?NE,[E ?LE[ o d I o I I ? ''' I I 'I - I i a I i I I I I P?P,? N -? o I Eel 'ER, l u? x?-P _ ? of ------------ -- -- --- --- ---------------- -- P ? L oN[P r. v R1 ic NMI 111?1 41 -111 1,L N, e a c 'IN ti T X r? EXIT EXIT r 4- x: -_ _ ? oases. NOTE; m P IxeL LOCei SONS POE µL i1EE <OxP $T E$ TORE v+[ 01 IN OR DURING eL N LODIL 1I IIP vviDPU Y eN0 PURLIx'S V000POINeiOP? SEi-I ,a nww voiv ?-o?,[nid a tt,e,[ . *4NO, `rah Northside ga#acc" sew, 199C. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: August 30,2006 To: City of Clearwater Planning Department Attn: Sherry Watkins Reference: Gulf to Bay Plaza NES: 570 We Transmit: () Enclosed () Under Separate Cover () Mail () Courier () Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered () Per Your Request () For Your Review & Comment () For Your Use (X) For Your Approval () For Your Files ( ) For Your Information ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 3 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER () Originals Q Prints () Addendum () Shop Drawings () Specifications () Application () Floppy Disk COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 8 8/30/06 Sheet C3.1 & L1.1. Comments: Copies To: File Doreen A. Williams Project Director 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 Clearwater J U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: . jf - ?503 L Phone: ?- 4.3 - Z 8 & FROM: Phone: L Z?S DATE:_ 0 RE: n3 (" Ia-Z? MESSAGE: l ISM d f?x.rt.a / -1i NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Z 9 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 4:50 PM To: 'Doreen Williams' Subject: RE: Gulf to Bay Plaza Drawn and faxed. -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:doreen.northside@gmaii.com] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 3:32 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: Gulf to Bay Plaza WHAT? I am so confused! ! ! ! ! Can you draw on my plan what you are looking for a fax it to me PLEASE On 8/25/06, Wayne.Wellskmyclearwater.com <Wayne.Wells(a myclearwater.com > wrote: Doreen - Yes, this is essentially what I was looking for. I would change it slightly so as to have the flat area directly across from the sidewalk/ramp in the interior island across the drive-thru lane and i eliminate the excess sidewalk to the southwest of this flat area. The ramp from the flat area {111 would go northeast from the flat area along the sidewalk (parallel with the building). The j dimensions are great (five-foot wide sidewalk and seven-foot foundation landscape area). 4 Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto: doreen.northside@gmaii.com] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 2:38 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Gulf to Bay Plaza Wayne, please see attached revision. Is this what you are looking for in regards to landscaping & ramp? 8/25/2006 11r '%rr+ swl? Aug. 25 2006 04:49PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Aug.25 04:47PM 01'49 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #104. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). 4.. ?wu. . PLANTER '32'x i07 - H. C. RAMP 14:1 SLOPE (SEE DETAIL) w s A ?ff 7" pp", 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 2:45 PM To: 'Doreen Williams' Subject: RE: Gulf to Bay Plaza Doreen - Page I of I Yes, this is essentially what I was looking for. I would change it slightly so as to have the flat area directly across from the sidewalk/ramp in the interior island across the drive-thru lane and eliminate the excess sidewalk to the southwest of this flat area. The ramp from the flat area would go northeast from the flat area along the sidewalk (parallel with the building). The dimensions are great (five-foot wide sidewalk and seven-foot foundation landscape area). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:doreen.northside@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 2:38 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Gulf to Bay Plaza Wayne, please see attached revision. Is this what you are looking for in regards to landscaping & ramp? 8/25/2006 COIiIG WALK LAIVL PLANTER '32x10) - H. C. RAMP _w 1.41 SLOPE (SEE DETAIL) Flir TA n7 - LOADING ZONE 9 E 0 • Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: We will try this again. Wells, Wayne Friday, August 25, 2006 11:42 AM 'doreen.northside@gmail.com' FLS2005-12098 - GTB Plaza From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 5:28 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLS2005-12098 - GTB Plaza Doreen - Here are the conditions still needing to be addressed (look at most recent date for the comment): LANDSCAPE: 1. 8/24/06 - WW - Need to plant palms or accent trees within the foundation landscaping adjacent to Retail "A," strategically located between units to minimize blocking of signage. Foundation landscape area on the northwest side needs to be widened. Adjacent sidewalk is excessively wide (10 feet wide) and there are no unit entrance doors on this side. Reduce to five feet in width and convert the balance to foundation landscaping. Convert ramp with wings to a flat area (with textured finish) with a ramp at 90-degrees to the flat area. Recommend railings along ramp to assist handicapped individuals. See me for details. 7/31/06 & 5/14/06 - WW Foundation width not dimensioned. Foundation landscaping not shown on north and northwest side of Retail "A". Suggest grouping palms west of Retail "B" to not block attached signage. 12/27/05 - WW Section 3-1202.E.2 requires foundation landscaping to have a landscape area at least five-foot wide and have at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade (facing the street). Landscape plan is deficient. Revise. SOLID WASTE: 1. 8-17-06 - TJG Need specs for compactor behind Retail B. For any compactor units, approval by the Director of Solid Waste is required 8-01-06 Compactors cut sheet shows length of unit 253" this will not fit in enclosure 5/15/06 - TJG For any compactor units, approval by the Director of Solid Waste is required need to address how SW will be handled. Provide a cut-sheet for approval. For Retail 'A" the double dumpster will be shared by all tenants in Retail "A". The owner of the complex will incur all costs for such dumpsters (he can bill to the tenants). One dumpster is suggested be for cardboard recycling. For Retail "B," suggest two dumpsters (one for garbage and one for cardboard). All dumpsters must be within enclosures. 12/19/05 - TJG Please explain solid waste service (double enclosure for retail A 14,000 Sq Ft and only single enclosure for 19,200 Sq Ft) angle for retail A enclosure not correct. Please show Publix compactor location. TRAFFIC: 1. 3. Show turning movement template for a WB-50 truck from the Southern most driveway on Belcher Road and Eastern most driveway on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. into the " loading zone". Truck must be able to go in and out of the loading zone in a forward direction without hitting curbs, buildings, objects, and etc. -10 . 0 0 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - TRUCK TRACKS APPEAR TO BE HITTING CURBS AND IN SOME AREAS CLOSE OF HITTING STUCTURES NEAR DUMSTER AND CARDBOARD BOX COMPACTOR AREAS. 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Trucks entering site from Belcher only is unrealistic. Design shall accommodate a truck making a left turn from westbound lanes of Gulf to Bay into site. Path for trucks entering from Belcher shown on Sheet C3.1 indicate that trucks may not be able to clear raised curb at the west exit to Gulf to Bay, the median of Gulf to Bay, the solid waste compactor pad and the dumpster enclosure. 8/18/06 - NOT MET - SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT SHOW THE PATH OF A TRUCK GOING WESTBOUND ON GULF TO BAY ENTERING THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY INTO THE SITE. 2. 5. The median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. must be designed to accommodate a WB-50 truck both entering and exiting the driveway. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - SHOW TRUCK GOING W-B MAKING A LEFT INTO EASTERN DRIVEWAY. 8/18/06 - NOT MET - SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT SHOW THE PATH OF A TRUCK GOING WESTBOUND ON GULF TO BAY ENTERING THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY INTO THE SITE. 3. 8. Provide stops signs and stop bars where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN WITH NOTE. 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Provide stop signs for western driveway along Gulf to Bay, provide stop sign and right turn only sign for northern driveway along Belcher and delete stop sign at signalized driveway on Belcher Road. 8/18/2006 - CROSSWALK MARKINGS SHALL TERMINATE AT THE RAMPS. DELETE THE WORD STOP ON THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT THE SOUTH, SIGNALIZED DRIVEWAY TO BELCHER ROAD. ZONING: 1. 8/24/06 - WW The Flexibility criteria for a parking reduction states that "the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes." The proposal indicates a 34 parking space deficit from the five spaces per 1,000 square feet requirement. This equates to 6,800 square feet of GFA. Between Publix and Retail B primarily, demonstrate that there is 6,800 square feet of floor area that would be "used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes." 8/7/06 - WW Continuing to discuss parking reduction with Engineering. Will get back to you. 5/12/06 - WW Unclear of request. Response letter dated Jan. 11, 2006, but submitted April 11, 2006, states that "we wish to leave five spaces per 1,000 SF." Revised Exhibit "A" includes a parking reduction from five to four spaces per 1,000 square feet, however, no parking reduction study has been submitted. There is a discussion regarding parking in the response to Criteria #1 of the General Applicability criteria. Parking calculations on Sheet C1.1 indicates 438 spaces are required, however, only 405 spaces are being provided (which therefore appears to indicate a need for a parking reduction). Please clarify the request, the numbers and all application materials. If a parking reduction is really being requested, a parking reduction study must be submitted justifying the reduction. 12/27/06 - WW According to Urban Land Institute (ULI) standards and the range of required parking for retail sales, Staff would support a reduction of parking below five spaces per 1,000 sf to as low as four spaces per 1,000 sf (will need some type of a Parking Study justifying the reduction at least on the type of shopping center and types of use). This type of a neighborhood shopping center does not generate the need for five spaces per 1,000 sf (as a mall would) and a lower number of parking spaces would make greater use of, and promote a greater turnover of cars in, the provided parking. This also reduces the amount of impervious surface. Obviously, the location of spaces needs to reflect where needs are, but some of the outlying parking west of the grocery store may be able to be reduced/eliminated. Wayne s> • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 5:28 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLS2005-12098 - GTB Plaza Doreen - Here are the conditions still needing to be addressed (look at most recent date for the comment): LANDSCAPE: 1. 8/24/06 - WW - Need to plant palms or accent trees within the foundation landscaping adjacent to Retail "A," strategically located between units to minimize blocking of signage. Foundation landscape area on the northwest side needs to be widened. Adjacent sidewalk is excessively wide (10 feet wide) and there are no unit entrance doors on this side. Reduce to five feet in width and convert the balance to foundation landscaping. Convert ramp with wings to a flat area (with textured finish) with a ramp at 90-degrees to the flat area. Recommend railings along ramp to assist handicapped individuals. See me for details. 7/31/06 & 5/14/06 - WW Foundation width not dimensioned. Foundation landscaping not shown on north and northwest side of Retail "A". Suggest grouping palms west of Retail "B" to not block attached signage. 12/27/05 - WW Section 3-1202.E.2 requires foundation landscaping to have a landscape area at least five-foot wide and have at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade (facing the street). Landscape plan is deficient. Revise. SOLID WASTE: 1. 8-17-06 - TJG Need specs for compactor behind Retail B. For any compactor units, approval by the Director of Solid Waste is required 8-01-06 Compactors cut sheet shows length of unit 253" this will not fit in enclosure 5/15/06 - TJG For any compactor units, approval by the Director of Solid Waste is required need to address how SW will be handled. Provide a cut-sheet for approval. For Retail 'A" the double dumpster will be shared by all tenants in Retail "A". The owner of the complex will incur all costs for such dumpsters (he can bill to the tenants). One dumpster is suggested be for cardboard recycling. For Retail "B," suggest two dumpsters (one for garbage and one for cardboard). All dumpsters must be within enclosures. 12/19/05 - TJG Please explain solid waste service (double enclosure for retail A 14,000 Sq Ft and only single enclosure for 19,200 Sq Ft) angle for retail A enclosure not correct. Please show Publix compactor location. TRAFFIC: 1. 3. Show turning movement template for a WB-50 truck from the Southern most driveway on Belcher Road and Eastern most driveway on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. into the " loading zone". Truck must be able to go in and out of the loading zone in a forward direction without hitting curbs, buildings, objects, and etc. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - TRUCK TRACKS APPEAR TO BE HITTING CURBS AND IN SOME AREAS CLOSE OF HITTING STUCTURES NEAR DUMSTER AND CARDBOARD BOX COMPACTOR AREAS. 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Trucks entering site from Belcher only is unrealistic. Design shall accommodate a truck making a left turn from westbound lanes of Gulf to Bay into site. Path for trucks entering from Belcher shown on Sheet C3.1 indicate that trucks may not be able to clear raised curb at the west exit to Gulf to Bay, the median of Gulf to Bay, the solid waste compactor pad and the dumpster enclosure. 8/18/06 - NOT MET - SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT SHOW THE PATH OF A TRUCK GOING WESTBOUND ON GULF TO BAY ENTERING THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY INTO THE SITE. 2. 5. The median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. must be designed to accommodate a WB-50 truck both entering and exiting the driveway. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - SHOW TRUCK GOING W-B MAKING A LEFT INTO EASTERN DRIVEWAY. 8/18/06 - NOT MET - SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT SHOW THE PATH OF A TRUCK GOING WESTBOUND ON GULF TO BAY ENTERING THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY INTO THE SITE. 3. 8. Provide stops signs and stop bars where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN WITH NOTE. 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Provide stop signs for western driveway along Gulf to Bay, provide stop sign and right turn only sign for northern driveway along Belcher and delete stop sign at signalized driveway on Belcher Road. 8/18/2006 - CROSSWALK MARKINGS SHALL TERMINATE AT THE RAMPS. DELETE THE WORD STOP ON THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT THE SOUTH, SIGNALIZED DRIVEWAY TO BELCHER ROAD. ZONING: 1. 8/24/06 - WW The Flexibility criteria for a parking reduction states that "the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes." The proposal indicates a 34 parking space deficit from the five spaces per 1,000 square feet requirement. This equates to 6,800 square feet of GFA. Between Publix and Retail B primarily, demonstrate that there is 6,800 square feet of floor area that would be "used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes." 8/7/06 - WW Continuing to discuss parking reduction with Engineering. Will get back to you. 5/12/06 - WW Unclear of request. Response letter dated Jan. 11, 2006, but submitted April 11, 2006, states that "we wish to leave five spaces per 1,000 SF." Revised Exhibit "A" includes a parking reduction from five to four spaces per 1,000 square feet, however, no parking reduction study has been submitted. There is a discussion regarding parking in the response to Criteria #1 of the General Applicability criteria. Parking calculations on Sheet C1.1 indicates 438 spaces are required, however, only 405 spaces are being provided (which therefore appears to indicate a need for a parking reduction). Please clarify the request, the numbers and all application materials. If a parking reduction is really being requested, a parking reduction study must be submitted justifying the reduction. 12/27/06 - WW According to Urban Land Institute (ULI) standards and the range of required parking for retail sales, Staff would support a reduction of parking below five spaces per 1,000 sf to as low as four spaces per 1,000 sf (will need some type of a Parking Study justifying the reduction at least on the type of shopping center and types of use). This type of a neighborhood shopping center does not generate the need for five spaces per 1,000 sf (as a mail would) and a lower number of parking spaces would make greater use of, and promote a greater turnover of cars in, the provided parking. This also reduces the amount of impervious surface. Obviously, the location of spaces needs to reflect where needs are, but some of the outlying parking west of the grocery store may be able to be reduced/eliminated. Wayne '41 . _ +?Qrj?J}iA{/iI s ??f V^ L °- 0 y?''Q7EP?`"' Fire Condition 12/18/2005 J • • Conditions Associated With FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD James Keller 562-4327 x3062 Provide and show on the site plan 24 ft width at driveways / drive aisles for emergency vehicle Not Met ingress and egress for front and rear parking lots. Where drive way is split by an island with one-way traffic each side of island provide and show on site plan minimum 20 ft width driveway on each side or remove island to provide required width. PRIOR TO DO 4-18-2006 The driveway located at the west end on the north side shows a island which has to have a minimum of 20 feet in width on each side.(JFK). 8-3-06 The island in the west drive on Gulf To bay MUST be 20' on each side of the island for Fire Vehicle Access. If you choose to remove the Island you can have a 24' width.(JFK) 8-17-2006 Letter did not address the Drive on Gulf to Bay to be stripped. This will be going to the r -,?? •`, D.O.T. per Doreen from Northside August 31,2006 and this is a condition for our approval. (JFK) Landscape 12/27/12005 ?v Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 8/24/06 - WW Need to plant palms or accent trees within the foundation landscaping adjacent to Retail strategically located between units to minimize blocking of signage. Foundation landscape area on the northwest side needs to be widened. Adjacent sidewalk is excessively wide (10 feet wide) and there are no unit entrance doors on this side. Reduce to five feet in width and convert the balance to foundation landscaping. Convert ramp with wings to a flat area (with textured finish) with a ramp at 90-degrees to the flat area. Recommend railings along ramp to assist handicapped individuals. See me for details. 7/31/06 & 5/14/06 - WW Foundation width not dimensioned. Foundation landscaping not shown on north and northwest side of Retail "A". Suggest grouping palms west of Retail "B" to not block attached signage. 12/27/05 - WW Section 3-1202.E.2 requires foundation landscaping to have a landscape area at least five-foot wide and have at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade (facing the street). Landscape plan is deficient. Revise. 07/31/2006 8/24/06 - WW 7 Interior landscaping increased to 9.0%. 7/31/06 - WW Site Data table indicates only 7.36% interior landscaping provided, whereas 10% is required (22,399 square feet); however, some areas have been counted that shouldn't and some areas haven't been counted that could. The area that cannot be counted is the lane divider in the northern driveway on Belcher Road (it is within the front perimeter buffer). The area on the south side of Retail "B" can be counted, as well as a portion of the landscape area on the north side of the easternmost parking row adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd north of Retail "A" (but the perimeter buffer west of the eastern driveway on Gulf to Bay Blvd. would also need to be planted so as to allow calculation of this area as interior landscaping). Recalculate. It is also noted that the landscape area south and east of Retail "B" is indicated as if there is a sidewalk between the doorway on the east side of the building and the sidewalk to the condominiums to the south. Based on Sheet C3.1, there is no sidewalk connector. Need to landscape this area (revise Sheet L1.1) and add into interior landscape calculations. Not Met Not Met Interior green space areas must meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 to qualify as interior green space (one shade tree per 150 sf of required interior green space. Two accent trees (crape myrtle and ligustrum tree) equal one shade tree; three palms equal one shade tree). Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 CaseConditons Print Date: 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 6 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD C7 Land Resource Condition V ` Rick Albee 727-562-4741 08/18/2006 Remove the "RIBBON" tree barricade detail prior to building permit. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 12/19/2005 8-17-06 need specs for compactor behind Retail B For any compactor units, approval by the Director of Solid Waste is required ,t8-01-06 Compactors cut sheet shows length of unit 253" this will not fit in enclosure need to address how Sw will be handled. 5/15/06 - TJG For any compactor units, approval by the Director of Solid Waste is required. Provide a cut-sheet for approval. For Retail 'A" the double dumpster will be shared by all tenants in Retail "A". The owner of the complex will incur all costs for such dumpsters (he can bill to the tenants). One dumpster is suggested be for cardboard recycling. For Retail "B," suggest two dumpsters (one for garbage and one for cardboard). All dumspters must be within enclosures. 12/19/05 - TJG Please explain solid waste service (double enclosure for retail A 14,000 Sq Ft and only single enclosure for 19,200 Sq Ft) angle for retail A enclosure not correct. please show Publix compactor location. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 04/14/2006 Identify the land use for Lease Area 1 and Lease Area 2. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET- IF RETAIL AREA 1 & 2 BECOMES A RESTAURANT, THEN APPLICANT MUST REVISE THE SUBMITTED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND MITIGATE ANY IMPACTS FROM THE EXPECTED TRIP VOLUMES GENERATED FROM THE SITE. APPLICANT MUST ACKNOWLEDGE THIS IN A LETTER. 7/31/06 - MET 3. Show turning movement template for a WB-50 truck from the Southern most driveway on tea' Belcher Road and Eastern most driveway on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. into the " loading zone". Truck must be able to go in and out of the loading zone in a forward direction without hitting curbs, buildings, objects, and etc.. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - TRUCK TRACKS APPEAR TO BE HITTING CURBS AND IN SOME AREAS CLOSE OF HITTING STUCTURES NEAR DUMSTER AND CARDBOARD BOX COMPACTOR AREAS. 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Trucks entering site from Belcher only is unrealistic. Design shall accomodate a truck making a left turn from westbound lanes of Gulf to Bay into site. Path for trucks entering from Belcher shown on Sheet C3.1 indicate that trucks may not be able to clear raised curb at the west exit to Gulf to Bay, the median of Gulf to Bay, the solid waste compactor pad and the dumpster enclosure. Print Date: 08/24/2006 Not Met Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Page 2 of 6 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD C? Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 8/18/06 - NOT MET - SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT SHOW THE PATH OF A TRUCK GOING WESTBOUND ON GULF TO BAY ENTERING THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY INTO THE SITE. 5. The median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. must be designed to accommodate a WB-50 truck both entering and exiting the driveway. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - SHOW TRUCK GOING W-B MAKING A LEFT INTO EASTERN DRIVEWAY. 8/18/06 - NOT MET - SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT SHOW THE PATH OF A TRUCK GOING WESTBOUND ON GULF TO BAY ENTERING THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY INTO THE SITE. 6. Show the angle in degrees for the angular parking, the dimensions must comply to the City's parking lot standards. 4/14/2006- NOT MET - THE DEPTH FOR 60 DEGREE PARKING STALL MUST BE 20.5' LONG NOT 19' AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. 7/31/06 - MET 7. Provide crosswalk markings along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. and Belcher Road which must comply to current MUTCD standards. 4/14/2006- NOT MET - SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THIS CONDITION. PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN. 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Show crosswalks crossing driveways alnog Belcher Road and Gulf to Bay on Sheet C3.1. 8/18/2006 - MET 8. Provide stops signs and stop bars where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN WITH NOTE. 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Provide stop signs for western driveway along Gulf to Bay, provide stop sign and right turn only sign for northern driveway along Belcher and delete stop sign at signalized driveway on Belcher Road. 8/18/2006 - CROSSWALK MARKINGS SHALL TERMINATE AT THE RAMPS. DELETE THE WORD STOP ON THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT THE SOUTH, SIGNALIZED DRIVEAWY TO BELCHER ROAD. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. General note: A. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. B. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. C. Provide necessary improvements to bring affected roadway network to the City's acceptable level of service (LOS) per Traffic Impact Study or as determined by Traffic Operation's Manager or designee. (Development Code Section: 4-802 & 4-803) Print Date: 08/24/2006 CaseConditons Page 3 of 6 0 0 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Obtain FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the state road right-of-way. 2. Obtain Pinellas County permit for work in County R-O-W. 3. Close median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. nearest the Belcher Road and Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Cv? intersection. Thereby creating a longer westbound left turn lane for the major intersection and converting westernmost driveway to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. to be right-in and right-out only. 4/14/2006- NOT MET - CURRENTLY FDOT (DAN KARAS 727-570-5101 EXT. 35007) HAS SUPPORTED THIS CONDITION. NEED A LETTER FROM FDOT TO INDICATE NOT NECESSARY.B_E 7/31/06 - NOT MET 4. Show design for right turn lanes on Belcher Road for project driveways. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE PINELLAS COUNTY TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT INDICATING RIGHT TURN LANES IS NOT NECESSARY SINCE BELCHER ROAD IS MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY. B_E 7/31/06 - NOT MET 8/11/2006 - No decelerations lanes will be needed for driveways along Belcher Road, however, it is agreed in a meeting with Traffic Ops. and Doreen Williams from Northside Engineering that a larger ingress and egress driveway radius (50 foot radius) is needed instead of the decelearation lanes. 8/18/06 - MET Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-45.04 Not Met 12/27/2005 8/24/06, 7/28/06, 5/12/06 & 12/27/05 - WW ?? Condition of approval: a`1 Vq - That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the vacation of the 10-foot wide utility easement be cxt_ approved by City Council; 12/27/2005 8/24/06, 7/31/06, 5/12/00 & 5/27/05 - WW -rolp Condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in '`"the public records, with a copy of the recorded document submitted to the Planning Department. 12/27/2005 8/24/06 & 7/31/06 - WW Include as a condition of approval. /8/06 - WW C? After a meeting this morning with Housh Ghovaee and representatives of the developer, and after a subsequent site inspection, Michael Delk and I have determined that the four new power poles along the south property line (north of the mobile home park) can stay. There are existing utility lines along the east property line adjacent to the motel that may remain. All other utility poles are to be removed, either in Phase 1 or in Phase 2 of construction. As indicated by the developers, power for the shopping center will be brought from the new power poles underground to transformers to feed Retail A, Retail B and Publix. The existing utility line (which appears to be for cable or phone) along the north property line along Gulf to Bay Blvd. will be removed. It will be determined whether the utility pole on Gulf to Bay Blvd. at the northeast corner of the existing shopping center can or should be removed (hopefully removed). All utilities on-site will be underground. 5/12/06 - WW Site inspection along the south side of the property off Belcher Road (south of Publix) does not Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 08/24/2006 Page 4 of 6 0 0 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 indicate any above ground utilities. Unclear what overhead utilities being referred to that need to be retained due to tree preservation (?). Advise. Code requires all on-site utilities to be placed underground. Based on a site inspection on 5/14/06, NEW overhead utilities have been installed on-site along the south side of the property adjacent to the existing mobile home park and on-site on the east side of Publix at its northeast corner. These overhead lines must be placed underground on-site (see discussion under 1/12/06) within the 10-foot wide proposed utility easement. Along the east side of Lease Area #2, there is only one tree that will be affected, which is adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd in the northeast corner of the property. Conduits can be directionally bored at this location to resolve the tree conflict. Based on a site inspection, there are also some overhead lines along Gulf to Bay Blvd east of the existing main shopping center driveway that appears to only serve the subject property. Likewise there were overhead lines that ran north to south behind the existing shopping center that also appears to serve the subject property only. It appears that these existing overhead lines can be removed. The removal of these overhead lines in both locations will be beneficial visually, as well as beneficial to the existing trees that the lines run through. Staff will not support above ground on-site utilities. Revise/advise. 1/12/06 - WW At the 1/5/06 DRC meeting, the applicant advised there were above ground utilities along the south property line off Belcher Road that they want to retain. Additionally, there are existing above ground utilities serving the mobile home park coming off Gulf to Bay Boulevard that they want to relocate as above ground utilities to the east and south side of the property (adjacent to the motel and the north side of the mobile home park in the proposed 10-foot wide utility easement). After discussion with Neil Thompson, undergrounding these utilities appear practicable and should be required with the redevelopment of the property. 12/27/05 - WW All on-site utilities must be underground. 12/27/2005 8/24/06, 7/31/06, 5/12/06 & 1/5/06 - WW Not Met -90. At the DRC meeting, it was agreed to make this a condition of approval in the Development Order that this be done prior to the issuance of any permits. r , ,?a??'' 12/27/05 - WW Show the locations of parking lot lighting on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 and freestanding signage on Sheet L1.1. Coordinate such lighting locations, as well as freestanding signs, with proposed landscaping to ensure the proposed lights and signs will not be shielded by existing or future tree canopies and other landscape materials. 12/27/2005 8/24/06, 7/31/06, 5/12/06 & 1/5/06 - WW Not Met Qr0 At the DRC meeting, it was agreed that a condition of approval in the Development Order is that SN? these lease areas must meet Code - see comment below. JLVc? 12/27/05 - WW To ensure that Lease Areas #1 and #2 can be developed with permitted uses (most likely retail or restaurants), show at least a conceptual design for each Lease Area to indicate adequate parking, landscaping, loading, traffic circulation and dumpster access will work. 12/27/2005 8/7/06 - WW Not Met Continuing to discuss parking reduction with Engineering. Will get back to you. 5/12/06 - WW Unclear of request. Response letter dated Jan. 11, 2006, but submitted April 11, 2006, states that "we wish to leave five spaces per 1,000 SF." Revised Exhibit "A" includes a parking reduction from five to four spaces per 1,000 square feet, however, no parking reduction study has been submitted. There is a discussion regarding parking in the response to Criteria #1 of the General Applicability criteria. Parking calculations on Sheet C1.1 indicates 438 spaces are required, however, only 405 spaces are being provided (which therefore appears to indicate a need for a CaseConditons Print Date: 08/24/2006 Page 5 of 6 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 parking reduction). Please clarify the request, the numbers and all application materials. If a parking reduction is really being requested, a parking reduction study must be submitted justifying the reduction. 12/27/06 - WW According to Urban Land Institute (ULI) standards and the range of required parking for retail sales, Staff would support a reduction of parking below five spaces per 1,000 sf to as low as four spaces per 1,000 sf (will need some type of a Parking Study justifying the reduction at least on the type of shopping center and types of use). This type of a neighborhood shopping center does not generate the need for five spaces per 1,000 sf (as a mall would) and a lower number of parking spaces would make greater use of, and promote a greater turnover of cars in, the provided parking. This also reduces the amount of impervious surface. Obviously, the location of spaces needs to reflect where needs are, but some of the outlying parking west of the grocery store may be able to be reduced/eliminated. 12/27/2005 8/24/06, 7/31/06 & 5/14/06 - WW Not Met \?*,,Jnclude as a condition of approval. 'f? 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting it was agreed that screening of the mechanical equipment be shown on plans prior to the issuance of building permits. 12/27/05 - WW Based on the elevations submitted, it appears the proposal has adequately screened from view the rooftop mechanical equipment. However, Section 3-201.D requires the screening of mechanical equipment on all sides, including abutting properties. Need to address the rear of the shopping center. 05/15/2006 8/24/06, 7/31/06 & 5/15/06 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of building permits, dumpster rr` enclosures be constructed of the same materials, and painted the same, as the building. Print Date: 08/24/2006 CaseConditons Page 6 of 6 • Northside sv4v " .S'mla", gut. 0 CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: August 16, 2006 To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: FLS2005-12098 - 501 S. Belcher Rd. NES Proj# Gulf to Bay Plaza #570 Enclosed Mail Pick-Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment X For Your Approval For Your Information We Transmit: X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 3 Response to Comments 3 Tree Preservation Plan 8 Revised Architectural Sheets A4.2 & A4.3 8 Sets (11 Sheets) of Civil and Landscape Plans, 1 Signed and Sealed Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: Angel Uff1"Lcq0k6ctve Admin. Assistant Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams ORIGINAL RECEIVED 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARW ATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH@NORTHSIDEEN4INEERING.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 16 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER iii srwodaq? sett4Ct'4t, f 4i. Date: August 11, 2006 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL ORIGINAL RECEIVED To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: FLS2005-12098 - 501 S. Belcher Rd. NES Proj# Gulf to Bay Plaza #570 Enclosed Mail Pick-Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment X For Your Approval For Your Information We Transmit: AUG 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 3 Response to Comments 3 Tree Preservation Plan Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: 114? Angel H ? e , Ex cutive Admin. Assistant Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH@NORTHSIDEENGINEERING.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 Horths e August 8, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLS2005-12098 - 501 S. Belcher Rd. Update of Comments Dear Mr. Wells: CIVIL* LAND PLANNIN60 ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL. RECEIVED AUG 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OF CLEARWATER Listed below are our responses to the updated comments to the Development Review meeting held on January 5, 2006. Fire Comment Posted 8-3-06: The Island in the west drive on Gulf to Bay MUST be 20' on each side of the island for Fire Vehicle Access. If you choose to remove the Island you can have a 24' width. Response: The island has will be flush and stripped per Sheet C3.1. Land Resource Comment I Posted 8/1/06: Tree 9125 is not indicated to be removed as stated. This tree has a high rating and is required to be preserved. Consult your arborist to discuss alternative designs to insure tree survivability prior to building permit. Response: Acknowledged Comment 2 Posted 8/1/06: Provide the preservation report that accompanies the preservation plan prior to building permit. Response: Preservation report is attached. Landscauine Comment 1 Posted 7/31/06: Response letter says the drainage oufall pip has been relocated; however, it looks as though it is in the same place as the last submittal. This drainage outfall pipe now creates issues for trees within the interior landscape islands. Could this pipe be moved to the ends of the parking spaces and interior landscape islands (next to the drive aisle)? Response: See revised Sheet C4.1 for relocation of outfall pipe. Comment 2 Posted 7/31/06: & 5/14/06: Foundation width not dimensioned. Foundation landscaping not shown on north and northwest side of Retail "A ". Suggest grouping palms west of Retail "B " to not block attached signage. Response: See Sheet C3.1 for foundation landscaping for Retail A and width dimensions. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN 4MINDSPRINC.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRINC.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Page 1 of 5 Comment 3 Posted 7/31/06: Accent trees are missing from two areas north and south of northern freestanding sign where "12 VA" are shown, Add two accent trees to each area. Response: Accent trees have been replaced. See Sheet L.1. Comment 4: Sheet Ll. I - Proposed trees have been relocated away from water meter bank for Retail "A ". However, this buffer still needs one tree per 35 feet of buffer area and since there are overhead power lines along this southern area, only accent trees can be planted along this southern edge (two adjacent trees = one shade tree). Revise. Response: See Sheet LLI for revised trees. Comment 5: Site Data Table indicates only 7.36% interior landscaping provided, whereas 10% is required (22,399 square feet); however, some areas have been counted that shouldn't and some areas haven't been counted that could. The area that cannot be counted is the lane divider in the northern driveway on Belcher Road (it is within the front perimeter buffer). The area on the south side of Retail "B" can be counted, as well as a portion of the landscape area on the north side of the easternmost parking row adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd north of Retail "A: (but the perimeter buffer west of the eastern driveway on Gulf to bay Blvd. would also need to be planted so as to allow calculation of this area as interior landscaping). Recalculate. Response: See Sheet C1.1 for revised interior landscape calculation and additional interior landscaping on Sheet L1.1. Comment 6: Need to dimension the width of ALL foundation landscape areas on Sheet C3.1. Based on Sheet LI.1, there is no foundation landscaping provided on the north and west sides of Retail A. Minimum width is five feet. Landscape in accordance with Code requirements on Sheet L1.1. Response: All foundation landscaping has been dimensioned and Sheet L1.1 now shows Retail foundation landscaping. Comment 7: Sheet LI - Can you enlarge the note on Lease Area #1 regarding future landscaping to the same size as that shown for Lease Area #2? Response: Note has been enlarged. Comment 8: Sheet LI. I - in three interior landscape islands in the middle of the parking area west of Publix bald cypress trees are not indicated where Ligstrum Trees and Sable Pallmettos were previously indicated. Bald Cypress will not work in these islands. Return these islands to Ligstrum Trees and Sable Palmettos. Response: We are now back to Ligustrum & Pallmetto Trees, no more Bald Cypress. What were we thinking? Comment 9: Sheet LI. 1 -Landscape Table: A. I only count 19 WE (not 20). Recount/revise. B. I count 56 LT (not 54). Recount/revise. C. I count 1104 MJ (not 1039). Recount/revise. D. I count 535 VA (not 523). Recount/revise. E. I only count 6471H (not 658). Recount/revise. F. I only count 456 AG (not 464). Recount/revise. Responses: Landscape Table has been corrected. Page 2 of 5 • Comment 10: Sheet Ll. I North of the words "Retail A " there are two boxes that are not tied to any landscape area, one that is for 10 MJ and one for 10 MJ. They are not included in any of the plant counts previously commented on. Revise. Response: Labeled boxes leading to nowhere have been removed. Comment 11: Sheet LI.I -There are some plant materials located on the north side of the southern driveway on Belcher Rd on the curved area next to the existing tree that is being removed that is not indicated as to what type of plants and the number of plants (they look like IS). Revise. Response: Plants have been identified. Solid Waste Comment 1 Posted 8/1/06: Compactors cut sheet shows length of unit 253 " this will not fit in enclosure need to address how SW will be handled. Response: Publix Compactor (PT-230) shows 98"(8') W x 253" (21') L. Our plans show the compactor dimensioned at 10'x25'. Traffic Engineering Comment 2: Not Met - Currently FDOT (Dan Karas 727-570-5101 Ext 35007) has supported this condition. Need a letter from FDOT to indicate not necessary. Response: Per meeting with Traffic Engineering 8/11/06, this will become a Condition of Approval on the D.O. Comment 3: Not Met - truck tracks appear to be hitting curbs and in some areas close of hitting structures near dumpster and cardboard box compactor areas. Response: Comment has been met per meeting with Traffic Engineering 8/11/06 Comment 3 Posted on 7/31/06: Not met - trucks entering site from Belcher only is unrealistic. Design shall accommodate a truck making a left turn from westbound lanes of Gulf to Bay into sire. Path for trucks entering from Belcher shown on Sheets C3.1 indicate that trucks may not be able to clear raised curb at the west exit to Gulf to Bay, the median of Gulf to Bay, the median of Gu f to Bay, the solid waste compactor pad and the dumpster enclosure. Response: Comment has been met per meeting with Traffic Engineering 8/11/06 Comment 5: Show truck going W-B making a left into eastern driveway. Response: Comment has been met per meeting with Traffic Engineering 8/11/06 Comment 7: Show cross walks crossing driveways along Belcher Road and Gulf to Bay on Sheet C3.1. Response: Cross-walks are shown on Sheet C3.1. Comment 8: Provide stops signs for western driveway along Gulf to Bay, provide stop sign and right turn only sign for northern driveway along Belcher and delete stop sign at signalized driveway on Belcher Road. Response: Stop signs and stop bars have been revised on Sheet C3.1. Page 3 of 5 Comment 9: Provide a letter from the Pinellas County Traffic Department indicating right turn laces is not necessary since Belcher Road is maintained by the County. Response: Per meeting with Traffic Engineering 8/11/06, this is no longer necessary, just increase radii at flares. See Sheet C3.1 for revised radii. Planning Comment 1: Condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the vacation of the 10- foot wide utility easement be approved by City Council. Response: Acknowledged. Comment 2: Not shown on elevations the locations of attached building signage (indicates as "signage" or "tenant'). Response: See revised architectural elevations Comment 3: Condition of approval: That prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records, with a copy of the recorded document submitted to the Planning Department. Response: Acknowledged. Comment 4: Include as a condition of approval: after a meeting this morning with Housh Ghovaee and representatives of the developer, and after a subsequent site inspection, Michael Delk and I have determined that the four new power poles along the south property line (north of the mobile home park) can stay. There are existing utility lines along the east property line adjacent to the morel that may remain. All other utility poles are to be removed, either in Phase 1 or in Phase 2 of construction. As indicated by the developers, power for the shopping center will be brought from the new power poles underground to transformers to feed Retail A, Retail B and Publix. The existing utility line (which appears to be for cable or phone) along the north property line along Gu f to bay Blvd will be removed, Ti will be determined whether the utility pole on Gulf to bay Blvd at the northeast corner of the existing shopping center can or should be removed (hopefully removed)/ All utilities on-site will be underground. Response: Acknowledged Comment 5: At the DRC meeting, it was agreed to make this a condition of approval in the Development Order that this be done prior to the issuance of any permits. Show the locations of parking lot lighting on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 and freestanding signage on Sheet L1.1. Coordinate such lighting locations, as well as freestanding signs, with proposed landscaping to ensure the proposed lights and signs will not be shielded by existing or future tree canopies and other landscape materials. Response: Acknowledged. Comment 6: At the DRC meeting, it was agreed that a condition of approval in the Development Order is that these lease areas must meet Code- to ensure that Lease areas #1 & #2 can be developed with permitted uses (most likely retail or restaurants), show at least a conceptual design for each Lease Area to indicate adequate parking, landscaping, padding, traffic circulation and dumpster access will work. Response: Acknowledged Page 4 of 5 Comment 8: Include as a condition of approval: At the DRC meeting it was agreed that screening of the mechanical equipment be shown on plan prior to the issuance of building permits. Based on the elevations submitted, it appears the proposal has adequately screened from view the rooftop mechanical equipment. However, Section 3.201.D requires the screening of mechanical equipment on all sides including abutting properties. Need to address the rear of the shopping center. Response: Acknowledged. Comment 9: Relocate the sidewalk ramp in front of the southern portion of Retail "B " to line up with the crosswalk from the handicap parking space. Response: Sidewalk ramp have been revised. See Sheet CM Comment 10: Sheet C3.1 -Dimension the width of the driveway/drive isle on the east side of the property (west of Lease Area #2) as it enters the mobile home park (it is less than 30 feet). Response: See revised CM for driveway/drive aisle width Comment 11: Potential condition of approval: That prior to the issuance of building permits, dumpster enclosures be constructed of the same materials, and painted the same, as the building. Response: Acknowledged, but see note on Sheet C3.1. Comment 12: Sheet C3.1 and Ll. I -Wheel stops are required adjacent for parking spaces adjacent to landscaped areas (single space west of Retail "B " along east side of Lease area #1 spaces that have the vehicles front to landscape islands). Response: Wheel stops have been added. If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. Sincerely, n iams Ao Ure e J Project Director Page 5 of 5 . ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 112006 Tree l"reservation Plan ?&4 ,PLANNING DEPARTMENT Gulf --- to flay Plaza Ger;reral site notes: All pruning and other arboricultural practices conducted on this site shall be performed by or under the supervision of -in International Society of. Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and in accordance will) applicable: American National Standards Institute (ANSI) criteria for t:rce care operations as defined in ANSI A-3K '-free barricades shall be constructed. around protected trees being preserved prior to the corninence rneiat of construction or site clearing activities. BaffiCIMICS S11,1111 h cmistructed using 2x4 huxzber for upright posts installed 5' oat center to a minimum depth of 12", with a height of at least 3' extending above grade. The upright posts sl,iall be connected with plastic ora..nge niesh equal to the height of the 2x4 uprights and fastened securely to the upright posts. The barricades shall renaain in place throughout the construction process and should le inspected for e onrpliancc by City of' Clearwater inspector, once installation is cot aploted. 'I'he Iocatiora of tree b a.rri.cades will be delineated. on the tree preseavatior-, plan. Tree rrown's that wilt be inipacted by construction oil that tire locatod. over proposed vehicular use areas will he raised to a rnininiuril height of 14' above; f"ra(le to fiacilitate construction equipment and Future vehicular traffic. Pruning ball be compl.cted pric,:r to heavy equipment entering the; site and. will be delineated o.ra the tree preservation plan. lx.oot lrrurriirg will be performed l:rya Vernaeer or Doscocil root I')run_ing inachine to a depth_ of 12". Tre? barricades will. be installed in the root: prune litres irnnreeliately after the root pruarirag is complete.. The root prune trench shall be baclclilled with the same soil removed during the root pruniaag operation and all, debris shall be rc_raroved from the site. It will be necessary to consult with t le 1'rojcxt: Superintendent to determine the exa;t location of the root pre.€rre: liaae T'he area to be root: pruned will be delineated on the tree preservation playa. ?V.AXE. aeration units shall be installed per the naanufact:urer's spe.cilacation iu the arcas designated can the tree preservation plan. Spe>.cifie trce preservation measii.res: Tr°Fe ttt -- The grade will be raised appro xiniate,ly 1.5' within the portion of the, critical root. zont, (CRZ I' radius for ca-ch 1" of ti-tinc.diaaineter nre;asureel 41.5' abovr'; grade) located in the Trroposed parking lot. In the, CR'Z area. the existing sub-base will re:naain intact (o preserve existing tools and new sub-base and asphalt will be adds d on top. W.n.N.I?. aeration units will be installed to a depth of 24" per the manc.A cturers spacing to provide for the exchange of gases to the tree's root system. The fill will be retained by C.X.tended curbs or landscape timbers as delineated on the plan. J'he tree will be barricaded per the specifications in the general site notes. Trees 14.2 - 8 will not be affected by proposed grade charges and their roods will not be impacted. 'Hie trees will be barricaded and pruned pet- the specification in the general site notes. Trees J1 - l 1 - will be itilpacted by the construction oI <a ?v?jter line and will be root pruned, to a depth of 12" Whea:e delineated on the plan. The tries ?-dill b :- t)ncricaded and pruned l)c:r tlae , c I leatir,?n in the general site notes. Tree 02 - will be affected by a grade cut and wi.l.l_ be root pruned to a dep(:h of 1.2" vvh(?re del.ineaterl on the plan. The root pruning, crown pruning; and iarrir,,:idirig will be per[Ormed per the specifications in. the general site notes. Q 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:06 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FW: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:47 AM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Cc: Angel Haines (E-mail) Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd Doreen - Attached are the current comments for your review and use (this is an update of the Jan. 5, 2006 DRC agenda), with the following department comments still not met: Fire - See Jim Keller comment dated 8/3/06. Land Resource - Rick Albee's comments will be conditions to be included in the Development Order (prior to issuance of any building permit). Landscaping - See my comments dated 7/278/06, 7/31/06, 8/3/06 or new comments. Solid Waste - See Tom Glenn's comment dated 8/1/06. Traffic Engineering - See Bennett Elbo's comments dated 7/31/06. Planninq - See my comments dated 7/28/06, 7/31/06 and 8/7/06. See you at 1:30 pm. Wayne update 8.7.06 dre action agend... orthsige July 18, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 210 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-12098 - 501 - 525 Belcher Road / NES #570 DRC Response Dear Mr. Wells: CIVIL O LAND PLANNIN60 ENVIRONMENTAL• TRANSPORTATION • Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on January 5, 2006. General Engineering 1. Application for vacation has been submitted and waiting DO for final hearing. 2. Water service shall be provided via a tap into an existing water main from Belcher Road. note on Sheet C3.1. 3. DOT R-O-W permit NOI received. AMRC meeting to be held 8-30-06. 4. Pinellas County R-O-W permit pending. 5. D.E.P. permits pending. 6. Building will be sprinkled. See Architectural plans. 7. All fire hydrants will comply. 8. Dumpster enclosure detail on Sheet C6.2 and note has been added to Sheet C3.1. 9. Demolition permit to include cutting and capping existing sanitary sewer to manhole. See note on Demolition Plan, Sheet C2.1. 10. No unrestricted fire lines are required, if applicable, easement to City will be placed. General Note: 1. Acknowledged. Fire 1. 2. 3. 4. See FDC's and FHA's are within the required distances and hydrants are not located on same line as fire sprinkler. FDC located for Building A on Sheet C5.1. Belcher Road ingress/egress is divided by a painted stripe with a total of 42' width. The east ingress/egress at Gulf to Bay is 30'. No truck access into west ingress/egress at Gulf to Bay. Hydrant to be relocated to the west at the Gulf-to-Bay entrance. Landscape 10% Interior Condition 1. Sheet C 1. 1, Site Data Table indicates interior green space. 2. Landscape Islands are measured from the inside. 3. All interior landscaping has been shaded. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 21 2006 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRINC.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRINC.COM 727 - 443 - 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Page 1 of 3 PLANNING DEPARTWT CITY OF CLEARViA ER Landscaping 1. All foundation landscaping has been dimensioned. 2. Groundcover has been noted instead of sod. 3. Drainage outfall pipe has been relocated. 4. Landscape table has been revised 5. Trees have been moved as to not block sign. 6. Trees have been revised to take into account utility wires. 7. Trees have been relocated away from water meter bank.. Land Resources. 1. Parking lot grades at tree #125 & 129 have been revised. Tree #129 is to be removed. 2. Tree Preservation plan is attached. Solid Waste 1. Detail of enclosure has been revised. Owner requires compactors on site. 2. One dumpster is now for cardboard recycling. Traffic Engineering 1. Lease Area I & 11 will be retail. See attached letter. 2. Working with DOT regarding median. Per Paul Bertells, if ok with DOT, ok with him 3. Too dangerous. 4. Revised curbs and dumpster for truck movement. 5. No trucks will be making a left into eastern driveway. Sign has been posted. See Sheet C3.1. 6. See degrees for angular parking. Parking dimensions have been revised. 7. Crosswalk marking to comply with MUTCD standards. See Note Sheet C.1. 8. Stop signs and bars will comply with MUTCD standards. See Note Sheet C3.1. 9. Belcher Road has been approved with traffic, no right turn lane necessary. Note: All traffic comments have been addressed with Paul Bertels. Planning 1. Condition acknowledged for 10' easement. 2. Terminal island at sw corner of Retail A has been revised. 3. Freestanding signs meet 5' setbacks. 4. See revised architectural plans. 5. Unity of Title will be recorded prior to C.O. 6. Overhead utilities have been addressed with staff. 7. Parking lot light condition of approval. 8. Pylon sign to be removed shortly. 9. See attached easement with mobile home park. 10. See revised narrative for parking count. 11. Corrals have been moved to one side of landscape island. 12. See architectural for Retail B. 13. Condition acknowledged for mechanical equipment screening. ORIGINAL 14. See C3.1 for fence being revised 3' in sight triangles. RECEIVED 15. Sidewalk has been eliminated between h/c parking space. 16. Parking count has been revised on Sheet C3.1. JUL 21 2006 17. Compactor is now coordinated with architectural. 18. See revised Sheet A4.1 for height of hip roof. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 19. See revised Sheet A4.2 for elevations heights. CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2 of 3 0 0 20. Exit door on rear of retail B shows stoop. 21. See not for dumpster enclosure on Sheet C3.1. 22. Wheel stops have been indicated. 23. Stall length is public requirement. 24. C5.1 has been revised showing sanitary sewer for Lease Area I. 25. C5.1 has been revised for sanitary line running along Belcher for lift station. If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. Sincerely, Doreen A. Williams Project Director Page 3 of 3 Northside LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: July 20, 2006 To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: Gulf to Bay Plaza - FLS2005-12098 NES Proj# 570 Enclosed Mail Pick-Up Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files For Your Review & Comment X For Your Approval For Your Information Transmit: X Originals X Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 5 Response Letter 5 FLS Application with Revised Narrative 5 Letter of Authorization 5 Ingress and Egress Easement 5 Warranty Deed 5 Survey (2 Sheets 5 Comp Landscape Application 5 Traffic Letter 5 Compactor Information 2 Tree Preservation Plan 5 Tree Inventory and Tree Survey 5 Stormwater Report, 1 Signed and Sealed 5 Reduced Civil and Landscape Plans 5 Sets (11 Sheets) of Civil and Landscape Plans, 1 Signed and Sealed 5 Sets of Architectural Plans and Reduced Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: ORIGINAL Angel Haines, Executive Admin. Assistant RECEIVED JUL 212006 °PLANNING DEPARTMENT LARW4 T•.?t= ;r, .- CITY OF CLEARWATER 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 File N. Pelzer D. Williams • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:17 PM To: 'Doreen Williams' Subject: RE: Gulf to Bay Plaza You got them (attached). -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:Doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:20 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Gulf to Bay Plaza Wayne, can you please send me a clean copy of the comments? Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727-443-2869 / Fax: 446-8036 / Cell: 235-8474 Email: doreen@northsideengineering.com Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.5/377 - Release Date: 6/27/2006 7/19/2006 • 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 5:56 PM To: 'Doreen Williams' Subject: RE: Gulf to Bay Plaza Doreen - I'm sorry. The new table indicates for 60-degree parking, the stall to curb dimension is 20.5 feet and the drive aisle width is 18.0 feet. For 90-degree parking, the stall to curb dimension is 18.0 feet and the drive aisle width is 24.0 feet. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:Doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 4:38 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Gulf to Bay Plaza Hey, you never responded to my last e-mail completely. On parking spaces. Can 60 deg. And 90 deg. Spaces be 18' long or do we need to make the 60 deg. Spaces 20.5'? Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727-443-2869 / Fax: 446-8036 / Cell: 235-8474 Email: doreen@northsideengineering.com 6/6/2006 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 3:53 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLS2005-12098, 501-525 S. Belcher Road Conditions Doreen - Attached are the review comments for the above referenced case. Please resubmit five copies of plans addressing the comments at your earliest convenience. Thanks. Wayne CaseConditions.rtf ? ? r?31)rjF ?Ayi:Y 4 e=??';QTE?j.?u' Engineering Condition • • Conditions Associated With FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Steve Doherty 562-4773 12/22/2005 1. Applicant shall submit a complete vacation application for the 10-foot drainage and utility Not Met easement prior to issuance of the Development Order. 4/14/06 - MET 2. How will water and sewer be provided for Lease Area #1? 4/14/06 - THE REVISED UTILITY PLAN SHOWS TWO OPTIONS FOR SANITARY CONNECTIONS, BUT NO WATER SERVICE? The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit: 4/14/06 - ACKNOWLEDGED 2. A net increase in water meter sizes for this site will require payment of water and sewer impact fees. 3. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from D.O.T. 4. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County. 5. Need a copy of an approved D.E.P. permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Will building be provided with fire sprinkler systems? If yes, show location of all Fire Department Connections. 7. If required, any additional fire hydrant assembly shall be installed to meet Fire Department Regulations. A fire hydrant assembly cannot be restricted by any backflow prevention device. All applicable fees shall be paid by applicant. 8. Provide applicable details for dumpster enclosures; new dumpster enclosures: Maximum 6'-0" high and constructed of concrete block. Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building, see City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701. 9. Demolition permit shall include cutting and capping the existing sanitary sewer connection to manhole in Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 10. If an unrestricted fire line is required, applicant shall convey a water line easement to the City. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. n - i ni a nn/ .:.... :.. - - :a c..- o..:1.4:-- n - :a n....:..... -.4.:4:---1 . a _- Fire Condition James Keller 562-4327 x3062 12/18/2005 FDC's are required, and shall be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant Not Met within 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve. PRIOR TO DO 4-18-2006 FDC for building ' A' shows the fire riser but does not show the location of the new FDC 12/18/2005 Provide and show on the site plan 24 ft width at driveways / drive aisles for emergency vehicle Not Met ingress and egress for front and rear parking lots. Where drive way is split by an island with one-way traffic each side of island provide and show on site plan minimum 20 ft width driveway on each side or remove island to provide required width. PRIOR TO DO Print Date: 05/15/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 9 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Fire Condition Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3062 have a minimum of 20 feet in width on each side.(JFK). 12/18/2005 Relocate exsisting fire hydrant located east of west entrance off Gulf To Bay to the entrance for a Not Met more direct usage PRIOR TO DO 4-18-2006 Hydrant was relocated in the wrong direction, went East on the plan, should have gone West and relocate to west side of drive entrance.(JFK) Landscape 10% Interior Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/27/2005 5/11/06 - WW Not Met The required and provided interior green space area is not indicated in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1 as requested, but as indicated in the response letter dated January 11, 2006 (submitted April 11, 2006). Sheet C2.1 has been revised to remove the square footage of interior green space provided. Interior green space areas must meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 to qualify as interior green space. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10 parking spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft. and be 8 feet wide of green space from back of curb to back of curb (inside curbing). Many islands do not meet the minimum width requirement, nor the area requirement. One island west of Publix (with a cart return) is indicated as nine-foot wide, but is much greater in width. Indicate the width of each island, unless a typical width, and the square footage of each interior landscaped area. Interior landscaping is lacking in the area west of Publix, due to the parking space widths exceeding Code minimum requirement. Suggest reducing the width of parking spaces to the minimum requirement to meet the minimum landscape island widths. Staff will not support a reduction to the minimum interior green space requirement. Staff, however, would support a reduction to required number of parking spaces below five spaces per 1,000 sf. On Sheet C3.1 it appears that interior landscaping areas are attempted to be indicated with shading, however, there is no legend to indicate the shading is such. Include in the legend on Sheet C3.1. It appears that the large island north of Publix is being counted toward interior landscaping, but a review of the landscaping on Sheet L1.1 only indicates extremely minimal landscaping, such that the landscaping proposed doesn't qualify this large island for the full square footage of interior green space you may be attempting to calculate. A large island at the southeast corner of Retail "B" is also apparently being counted toward interior landscaping, but the landscape plan Sheet L1.1 does not show hardly any landscaping within this island, where it wouldn't qualify for the total square footage of the island. Revise. 12/27/05 - WW Per Section 3-1202.E.1 Code requires a minimum of 10% interior green space of gross vehicular use area (VUA). Based on the proposed VUA listed in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1, there should be 22,399 square feet of interior green space provided. Need to provide in the Site Data table the required and provided interior green space. Sheet C2.1 indicates 12,190 sf of interior green space provided. Interior green space areas must meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 to qualify as interior green space. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10 parking spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 so. ft. and be 8 feet wide of preen space from back of curb to back of curb. Manv islands Print Date: 05/15/2006 CaseConditons Page 2 of 9 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD • Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/27/2005 5/11/06 - WW Not Met Widths of foundation landscape areas still not dimensioned. Dimension such on Sheet C3.1. Foundation areas north and west side of Retail A has not been landscaped in accordance with Code requirements on Sheet 1-1.1. Provide an explanation why the areas adjacent to sidewalk ramps are proposed to be planted with sod rather than groundcover plants as the rest of the foundation areas. Otherwise, modify to groundcover plants. 12/27/05 - WW Dimension the width of the foundation landscape areas. Must plant the foundation landscape araac nar f`nria rani iiramPntc of .qartinn ?-19n9 F 9 c=arp chni ilri ha nivan to Inr.atinn of raniiirari 12/27/2005 5/12/06 - WW Not Met The drainage outfall pipe has now been moved eastward, which now creates issues for trees within the interior landscape islands. Could this pipe be moved to the ends of the parking spaces and interior landscape islands (next to the drive aisle)?\ Additionally, now a sanitary sewer line from Gulf to Bay is proposed to provide sanitary sewer service to Lease Area #1, running in the same location as the previous drainage outfall pipe. Can this pipe be run down the north/south drive aisle or be moved next to the west property line so that landscaping will not be planted directly over the pipe and the roots from the proposed trees will not impact the pipe? Also, the sanitary sewer pipe is being run right through Tree #18 at the northwest corner of Lease Area #1, which is supposedly being preserved (?). 12/27/06 - WW Coordinate the location of the retention pond outfall pipe along Belcher Road with the proposed lanricrnninn ac it nnnaarc that tha nrnnncari lanricraninn is hainn nlara rnrar tha tnn of tha nines 12/27/2005 5/14/06 - ww Not Met IN ADDITION TO THE NOTES BELOW, I COUNT ONLY 15 WE, WHERE YOU COUNT 16. REVISE. 12/27/05 - WW Sheet 1-1.1 - Landscape Table: a. I only count 1149 VS, however, the row of VS behind the grocery store and Retail B along the east property line is not indicated how many are in this row; 5/14/06 -1 NOW COUNT 861. THERE WAS A ROW OF 36 ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE CONDOS THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED (DON'T KNOW WHY). b. Relocate the landscape code name and quantities under the words "retention area" on both areas along Gulf to Bay Blvd., as I cannot read them; 5/14/06 - MET c. Move the proposed DH and XA into the actual interior landscape island north of the northern driveway on Belcher Road; 5/14/06 - MET d. I count 924 PJ, where you only say 894. Check/revise; 5/14/06 - MET (CHANGED OUT) e. I only count 32 MG, where you say 34; however, there are two trees with the symbol of MG south of the eastern retention pond not labeled. Revise; 5/14/06 - MET (CHANGED OUT) f. I only count 338 VA, where you say 364. Check/revise; 5/14/06 - I COUNT 344, WHERE YOU COUNT ONLY 308. REVISE. g. I only count 23 LT, where you say 25. Check/revise; 5/14/06 - MET h. I count 791 MJ, where you say 780. Check/revise; 5/14/06 -1 COUNT 490, WHERE YOU COUNT 440. REVISE. i. I only count 16 DH, where you say 19. However, to the rear of Retail B next to the dumpster it appears one DH not counted, as well as one DH appears to the west side of the western retention CaseConditons Print Date: 05/15/2006 Page 3 of 9 • • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 j. I only count 399 XA, where you say 446. Check/revise. 5/14/06 -1 COUNT 440, WHERE YOU COUNT 472. REVISE. 12/27/2005 5/14/06 - WW Not Met This comment needs to be re-reviewed in light of the percentage of interior landscaping provided, which has not been provided at this point. See other comments. 12/27/05 - WW Section 3-1202.E.1 requires one shade tree per 150 sf of required interior green space. Two accent trees (crape myrtle and ligustrum tree) equal one shade tree; three palms equal one shade tree. Some islands, which should have two shade trees only have one accent tree or three 12/27/2005 5/14/06 - WW Not Met Foundation width not dimensioned. Foundation landscaping not shown on north and northwest side of Retail "A". Suggest grouping palms west of Retail "B" to not block attached signage. 12/27/05 - WW Section 3-1202.E.2 requires foundation landscaping to have a landscape area at least five-foot wide and have at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade (facing the street). Landscape plan is deficient. Revise. 05/15/2006 There exist overhead utility lines along Belcher Road that are not being placed underground. As Not Met such, only accent trees should be planted within 20 feet of the overhead lines to prevent the need to trim the trees away from the overhead lines. Remember: Two accent trees equal one shade tree. Revise. Suggest relocating some of the shade trees to the north side of the parking lot adjacent to the rPtPntion nond. 05/15/2006 Sheet L1.1 - Relocate proposed trees away from water meter bank for Retal "A." Not Met Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 01/03/2006 1/3/06-Revise parking lot grades at tree #125 and 129 and any other tree that may be impacted Not Met by proposed grades. Recommend consulting your arborist to discuss alternative designs to insure tree survivability. Modify prior to D.O. 4/27/06-Further consideration is needed at tree #125, proposed grades are still too severe. 01/03/2005 Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape Not Met architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 12/19/2005 5/15/06 - TJG Not Met For any compactor units, approval by the Director of Solid Waste is required. Provide a cut-sheet for approval. For Retail 'A" the double dumpster will be shared by all tenants in Retail "A". The owner of the complex will incur all costs for such dumpsters (he can bill to the tenants). One dumpster is suggested be for cardboard recycling. Print Date: 05/15/2006 CaseConditons Page 4 of 9 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 please show Publix compactor location. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 04/14/2006 Identify the land use for Lease Area 1 and Lease Area 2. NOT MET- IF RETAIL AREA 1 & 2 Not Met BECOMES A RESTAURANT, THEN APPLICANT MUST REVISE THE SUBMITTED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND MITIGATE ANY IMPACTS FROM THE EXPECTED TRIP VOLUMES GENERATED FROM THE SITE. APPLICANT MUST ACKNOWLEDGE THIS IN A LETTER. B_E 4/14/2006 2. Close median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. nearest the Belcher Road and Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. intersection. Thereby creating a longer westbound left turn lane for the major intersection and converting westernmost driveway to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. to be right-in and right-out only. NOT MET - CURRENTLY FDOT (DAN KARAS 727-570-5101 EXT. 35007) HAS SUPPORTED THIS CONDITION. NEED A LETTER FROM FDOT TO INDICATE NOT NECESSARY. B_E 4/14/2006 3. Show turning movement template for a WB-50 truck from the Southern most driveway on Belcher Road and Eastern most driveway on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. into the " loading zone". Truck must be able to go in and out of the loading zone in a forward direction without hitting curbs, buildings, objects, and etc.. NOT MET - TRUCK TRACKS APPEAR TO BE HITTING CURBS AND IN SOME AREAS CLOSE OF HITTING STUCTURES NEAR DUMSTER AND CARDBOARD BOX COMPACTOR AREAS. B_E 4/14/2006 5. The median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. must be designed to accommodate a WB-50 truck both entering and exiting the driveway. NOT MET - SHOW TRUCK GOING W-B MAKING A LEFT INTO EASTERN DRIVEWAY. B_E 4/14/2006 6. Show the angle in degrees for the angular parking, the dimensions must comply to the City's parking lot standards. NOT MET - THE DEPTH FOR 60 DEGREE PARKING STALL MUST BE 20.5' LONG NOT 19' AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. B_E 4/14/2006 7. Provide crosswalk markings along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. and Belcher Road which must comply to current MUTCD standards. NOT MET - SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THIS CONDITION. PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN WITH NOTE. B_E 4/14/2006 8. Provide stops signs and stop bars where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. NOT MET - PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN WITH NOTE. B_E 4/14/2006 9. Show design for right turn lanes on Belcher Road for project driveways. NOT MET - PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE PINELLAS COUNTY TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT INDICATING RIGHT TURN LANES IS NOT NECESSARY SINCE BELCHER ROAD IS MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY. B_E 4/14/2006 All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. General note: A. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. B. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. C. Provide necessary improvements to bring affected roadway network to the City's acceptable level of service (LOS) per Traffic Impact Study or as determined by Traffic Operation's Manager or designee. (Development Code Section: 4-802 & 4-803) The following to be addressed prior to building permit: Print Date: 05/15/2006 CaseConditons Page 5 of 9 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/27/2005 5/12/06 & 12/27/05 - WW Not Met Condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the vacation of the 10-foot wide utility easement be approved by City Council; 12/27/2005 5/11/06 - WW Not Met Revise the terminal island at the southeast corner of Retail A to have the striped walkway as part of the pavement and otherwise curb the landscape island (ie: remove the walkway from the island by reducing the width of the island). 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting it was agreed to leave the loading area as shown on the plan, but to provide a striped access walkway north of the loading area and adjacent to the parking spaces to allow access to the sidewalk to the individual tenant spaces. 12/27/05 - WW The loading area behind the grocery store is dedicated for that store. Relocate the single loading space behind Retail A to be adjacent to the building to provide a loading space for those stores. 12/27/2005 5/11/06 - WW Not Met Response letter indicates that the freestanding signs now meet the required five-foot setback, however, freestanding signs shown on Sheets C2.1, C3.1, C4.1, C5.1 and L1.1 do not meet the required setback. Revise. 12/27/05 - WW Freestanding and attached signage is not approved with this application. A Comprehensive Sign Program will be necessary to be submitted for approval (based on two freestanding signs on Gulf to Bay Boulevard Belcher Road and assumed desired for Lease Areas #1 and #2). Signs will need to meet the required five-foot setback. All freestanding signs must be coordinated with the color and materials of the shopping center and/or buildings on the lease areas. 12/27/2005 5/11/05 - WW Not Met Not shown on elevations (no details, just "tenant" or "signage"). 12/27/05 - WW Show on the building elevations the locations of attached building signage (indicate as "signage" or "tenant'). 12/27/2005 5/12/06 & 5/27/05 - WW Not Met Condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records, with a copy of the recorded document submitted to the Planning Department. 12/27/2005 5/12/06 - WW Not Met Site inspection along the south side of the property off Belcher Road (south of Publix) does not indicate any above ground utilities. Unclear what overhead utilities being referred to that need to be retained due to tree preservation (?). Advise. Code requires all on-site utilities to be placed underground. Based on a site inspection on 5/14/06, NEW overhead utilities have been installed on-site along the south side of the property adjacent to the existing mobile home park and on-site on the east side of Publix at its northeast corner. These overhead lines must be placed underground on-site (see discussion under 1/12/06) within the 10-foot wide proposed utility easement. Along the east side of Lease Area #2, there is only one tree that will be affected, which is adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd in the northeast corner of the property. Conduits can be directionally bored at this location to resolve the tree conflict. Based on a site inspection, there are also some overhead lines along Gulf to Bay Blvd east of the existing main shopping center driveway that appears to only serve the subject property. Likewise CaseConditons Print Date: 05/15/2006 Page 6 of 9 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD • Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 All on-site utilities must be underground. 12/27/2005 5/12/06 & 1/5/06 - WW Not Met At the DRC meeting, it was agreed to make this a condition of approval in the Development Order that this be done prior to the issuance of any permits. 12/27/05 - WW Show the locations of parking lot lighting on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 and freestanding signage on Sheet L1.1. Coordinate such lighting locations, as well as freestanding signs, with proposed landscaping to ensure the proposed lights and signs will not be shielded by existing or future tree canopies and other landscape materials. 12/27/2005 5/12/06 & 1/5/06 - WW Not Met At the DRC meeting, it was agreed that a condition of approval in the Development Order is that these lease areas must meet Code - see comment below. 12/27/05 - WW To ensure that Lease Areas #1 and #2 can be developed with permitted uses (most likely retail or restaurants), show at least a conceptual design for each Lease Area to indicate adequate parking, 12/27/2005 5/12/06 & 1/16/06 - WW Not Met On 1/13/06 the Settlement Agreement was submitted wherein the billboard must be removed by June 1, 2006. Include as a condition of approval. 12/27/05 - WW Condition of approval: That no building permit be issued until the billboard is removed or compliance is achieved with all applicable sign ordinances. 12/27/2005 5/12/06 - WW Not Met Since the site is being designed to provide continued access to the mobile home park to Gulf to Bay Blvd, need to record an access easement prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 12/27/05 - WW Unless already recorded (and, if so, provide a copy of the recorded document), need to record a cross-access easement with the eye clinic to the south and the mobile home park to the south prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (condition of approval). 12/27/2005 5/12/06 - WW Not Met Unclear of request. Response letter dated Jan. 11, 2006, but submitted April 11, 2006, states that "we wish to leave five spaces per 1,000 SF." Revised Exhibit "A" includes a parking reduction from five to four spaces per 1,000 square feet, however, no parking reduction study has been submitted. There is a discussion regarding parking in the response to Criteria #1 of the General Applicability criteria. Parking calculations on Sheet C1.1 indicates 438 spaces are required, however, only 405 spaces are being provided (which therefore appears to indicate a need for a parking reduction). Please clarify the request, the numbers and all application materials. If a parkinq reduction is really beinq requested, a parkinq reduction study must be submitted justifyinq CaseConditons Print Date: 05/15/2006 Page 7 of 9 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD • Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 needs to reflect where needs are, but some of the outlying parking west of the grocery store may be able to be reduced/eliminated. 12/27/2005 5/14/06 - WW Not Met Three cart corrals have been shown. Recommend moving the corrals to one side of the islands to allow more cohesive landscaped area for plantings, as the small areas will not function well. 12/27/05 - WW Parking lot design does not provide for shopping cart return corrals. Revise Sheet C2.1 to show the corrals. 12/27/2005 5/15/06 - WW Not Met Withholding comment until elevations of Retail "B" are submitted. 12/27/05 - WW Code permits a maximum parapet of 30 inches from the highest roof deck elevation. The Planning Department has advertised a requested increase for the parapet for the grocery store of 10.17 feet (or 34.17 feet) above the roof deck at (24.0 feet). The parapet for Retail B is shown 12.5 feet above the highest roof deck (assumed to be 26 feet, since it is not indicated on "3 - Rear Elevation"; which is in conflict with the 24.0 feet indicated on "2 - Front Elevation"). Additionally, the parapet in the middle of Retail A is shown at 9.67 feet above the highest roof deck (assumed to be 20.0 feet, since it is not indicated on "4 - Rear Elevation"; which is in conflict with the 18.0 feet indicated on "2 - Front Elevation"). In all three instances, the parapet height is excessive and Staff will not support such a parapet height. No justification has been submitted for such parapet height. It appears.that the proposed height is only to accommodate increased attached signage. Reduce the parapet height to something more reasonable, potentially in the five-to-six foot height (which is double or more than double the minimum). In rnnr-.Arf With tha rani irfinn fn fha nnrnnAf hainhf tha hainhf of fha hin-rnnfArl cfri irti irac chn 11H 12/27/2005 5/14/06 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval. 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting it was agreed that screening of the mechanical equipment be shown on plans prior to the issuance of building permits. 12/27/05 - WW Based on the elevations submitted, it appears the proposal has adequately screened from view the rooftop mechanical equipment. However, Section 3-201.D requires the screening of mechanical equipment on all sides, including abutting properties. Need to address the rear of the 05/12/2006 Sheet C3.1 - Vinyl fence along the east property line adjecent to the motel must be reduced to a Not Met maximum of three feet in height in the front setback (first 25 feet). Additionally, the fence on both sides of the driveway to the mobile home park must be reduced to a maximum of three feet in height within a visibility triangle formed by the east/west mobile home drive and the drive access through this property. 05/12/2006 Eliminate the sidewalk between the handicap parking space and the single, angled space to the Not Met Print Date: 05/15/2006 CaseConditons Page 8 of 9 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD is Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 landscaping. Relocate the crosswalk slightly northward to line up with the walk aisle for the handicap parking space (little piece of sidewalk, crosswalk and ramp). 05/12/2006 Sheet C3.1 - Two parking areas indicated as having 21 spaces in the double rows of angled Not Met parking west of Publix only have 20 spaces. Revise. 05/12/2006 Sheet C3.1 - Dimension the width of the driveway/drive aisle on the east side of the property Not Met (west 05/15/2006 Compactor location for Publix shown on Sheets A2.1, A2.3 and A4.1 doesn't match that indicated Not Met on Sheets C2.1, C3.1, C4.1, C5.1 and 1-1.1. Which is correct? Revise all appropriate sheets. Ensure adequate drive aisle width is provided for delivery trucks, trash trucks and fire trucks. 05/15/2006 Sheet A4.1 - Need to provide the west and east elevations for Retail "B". Not Met 05/15/2006 Sheet A4.1 - North elevation for Retail "A" - Provide the height of the hip roof structure to the top Not Met of the structure. 05/15/2006 Sheet A4.2 - Not Met a. North elevation - Provide the height of the eastern and western "towers." b. West elevation - The eastern "tower" should be seen as "ghosted in." c. West elevation - Provide the height of the western "tower." d. East elevation - The eastern "tower," as well as the western "tower," should be seen in this elevation (should also see much of Retail "A" as it is angled). e. South elevation - A 24'-8" dimension to metal truss brg. is indicated on the right side, but it is unclear what this is indicating and is higher than 24'-8". 05/15/2006 There is an exit door on the rear of Retail "B" at the southeast corner shown on Sheet A2.3 and is Not Met also indicated on the civil plans. It is assumed that this door will provide access to the dumpster for Retail "B," due to its location. There is no stoop or sidewalk indicated on the civil plans to provide this access from the door to the dumpster. Indicate the stoop and sidewalk between the building and the dumpster on all civil and landscape plans. 05/15/2006 Potential condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of building permits, dumpster Not Met enclosures be constructed of the same materials, and painted the same, as the building. 05/15/2006 Sheet C3.1 and 1-1.1 - Wheel stops are required adjacent for parking spaces adjacent to Not Met landscaped areas (single space west of Retail "B," spaces south of Retail "A," spaces adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd [all rows], spaces adjacent to Belcher Road and along east side of Lease Area #1 05/15/2006 Note: Parking stall length may be reduced to 18 feet. Not Met 05/15/2006 Sheet C5.1 - Plans are confusing regarding sanitary sewer service to Lease Area #1: Not Met a. A sanitary sewer line has been shown paralleling Belcher Road from a manhole on Gulf to Bay Blvd. to a new lift station near Belcher Road; but b. A sanitary sewer line has been shown along the south side of Retail "B" connecting Lease Area #1 to an existing sanitary line at the rear of Retail "B" with a note of "cap 3" F.M. for future connnection to future lift station". Print Date: 05/15/2006 CaseConditons Page 9 of 9 Northside 49 CIVIL• LAND PLANNING • qiw" sm?a la, ENVIRONMENTAL • (? TRANSPORTATION • January 11, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 210 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: .FLD2005-12098 - 501 - 525 Belcher Road/ NES #570 DRC Response Dear Mr. Wells: Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on January 5, 2006. General Engineering 1. Application for vacation to be submitted prior to D.O. issuance. 2. Lease Area I shows stubs for utilities. 3. Acknowledged. 4. Acknowledged. 5. Acknowledged. 6. Building will be sprinkled. 7. All fire hydrants will comply. 8. All dumpsters will be compactors. 9. Demolition permit to include cutting and capping existing sanitary sewer to manhole. 10. No unrestricted fire lines are required, if applicable, easement to City will be placed. General Note: 1. Acknowledged. Environmental 1. See cross-sections for ponds. Fire 1. Fire flow calculations to be provided. 2. Acknowledged. 3. 24' drive aisles have been provided. 4. Hydrant to be relocated. Land Resource 1. All trees with canopies are shown. 2. Parking lot grades are revised. ORIGINAL 3. Consideration is being given to trees. RECEIVED 4. All trees are being considered regarding utilities. APR 11 2006 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 CITY OFCLEARWATER NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM Page 1 of3 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 0 0 Landscaping 1. Site data table and interior landscaping has been revised. Publix required spaces to be 9.5' wide. 2. Islands have been dimensioned. 3. Foundation landscaping has been dimensioned. 4. All existing trees have been located on C3.1 & L1.1. 5. Landscape plan has been revised. 6. Lease Area I landscape area now shows curbing. 7. All curbs have been shown. 8. A 6' vinyl PVC fence will be in lines of masonry wall to protect trees. 9. Lease area 11 is showing necessary curbing. 10. Outfall pipe has been moved closer to Belcher Road. 11 a. Landscape table has been revised. 1 lb. Landscape table has been revised. 11c. Landscape table has been revised. 11d. Landscape table has been revised. 1 le. Landscape table has been revised. l l f. Landscape table has been revised. ORIGINAL I lg. Landscape table has been revised. RECEIVED 1 Ill. Landscape table has been revised. APR l l 2006 ill. Landscape table has been revised. I lj. Landscape table has been revised. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 12. Trees have been revised. CITY OF CLEARWATER 13. Foundation landscaping has been revised. Stormwater 1. Acknowledged. 2. An underdrain system will be run for retention. 3. Drainage calculations are included. Solid Waste 1. Detail of enclosure has been revised. Owner requires compactors on site. Traffic Engineering 1. Lease Area I & II will be retail. 2. Cannot close median. Per Paul Bertells, if ok with DOT, ok with him 3. Too dangerous. 4. See WB-50 turning movement. 5. See WB-50 truck at median building. 6. See degrees for angular parking. 7. Crosswalk marking to "comply with MUTCD standards. 8. Stop signs and bars will comply with MUTCD standards 9. Belcher Road has been approved with traffic, no right turn lane necessary. Note: All traffic comments have been addressed with Paul Bertels. Planning 1. Condition acknowledged for 10' easement. 2. Pedestrian access easement not wanted by Publix - want to be able to lock gate. 3. Loading zone has been relocated. 4. Dumpster has been relocated. Page 2 of 3 0 0 5. See proposed signs with 5' setback. 6. See revised architectural elevation showing tenant signage. 7. Unity of Title acknowledged. 8. Unable to bury all overhead utilities due to tree preservation. 9. See note on plans "lighting plan by Progress Energy". 10. Condition to be added regarding Lease Areas I & II. 11. 10' wide easement to be used to relocate utilities. 12. Pylon sign to be removed on or before May 1, 2006. 13. Pedestrian crosswalk at southwest corner of retail B has been removed. 14. 90 degree spaces have been dimensioned. 15. Columns and cover walkways have been coordinated. 16. Owner does not wish to record easement. 17. Handicap spaces have been moved and one deleted for cart corral. 18. We wish to leave five spaces per 1,000 SF. 19. Aerial has been lightened. 20. All drive aisles have been dimensioned. 21. Stubs have been run to leased areas for the future. 22. Shopping cart corrals have been located on site. 23. The parapet height has been reduced to a maximum of 6' above the highest roof elevation and the hip roof structures have been lowered also. 24. The "hill house" on the rear of the grocery store roof has been indicted on the front elevation. 25. The front elevation has been revised. 26. Parapets are provided at the rear of the shopping center. The grocery store, which has unusually large roof top units, will be painted to match the rear of the center. 27. The awnings are perforated metal. 28. Cannot bury all overhead lines due to tree preservation. If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. incerely, D reen A. Williams Project Director ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR 112006 PLANNINI& OEPARTiv*I' ?'4 CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 3 of 3 NorthsMe E CIVIL* LAND PLANNING • ENVI RONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL RECEIVED LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: April 10, 2006 To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: Gulf to Bay Plaza FLS2005-12098 NES Proj# 570 We Transmit: Enclosed Under Separate Cover Mail UPS Overnight Pick-Up X Hand Delivered Per Your Request For Your Review & Comment For Your Use X For Your Approval For Your Files For Your Information APR 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENI' CITY OF CLEARWATER X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 1 Response letter 8 FLS Application 8 Letter of Authorization 8 Warranty Deeds 8 Survey x 2 Sheets 8 Drainage Calculations, 1 Signed and Sealed 3 Traffic Study 8 Reduced Civil and Landscape Plans 8 Tree Inventory and Survey 8 Sets (11 Sheets) of Civil and Landscape Plans 8 Sets of Architectural Plans 3 Fire Flow & Hydrant Calculation Sheet, Signed and Sealed PIE ase contact us (727) 443-2869 should y u have an questions or comments. File N. Pelzer %J1,--[1A oreen illiams, Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 01/13/2006 13:51 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG SVGS PAGE 01/17 0 Northside CIVIL + LANDSCAPE ¦ 5*xg.P sncrr'cea. 1wc. EAWITOMMENTAL + TRAIVSPORTATIQN + FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DATE: January t 2006 TIME: TO: Wayne iy.:1s - - FAX NO: OF: FROM: Angel Haines, Executive Administrative Assistant PROJECT N,AMF: Gulf to Bay Plaza / NES# 570 COMMENTS: Regarding the removal of the pylon sign. PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT OUR OFFICE SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS PROJECT. 601 CLEVELAND .STREET, SUITE 930 CLEAR WATER, FLORJDA 33755 T (727) 443.28691E (727) 446-8036 E-MAIL: NESTL- C'1,,@MINDSP.RIIVG.COM 1:55 pm 562-4865 PAGE 1 OF 19 01,/13/2006 13:51 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG Sif IN THE COUNTY COURT FOR THE sMM JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR P?LA ELLIS & CO., LTD., by and through its General Partner, RLBANCO, LLC, Plaintiff, VS. NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY d/bla VLkCOM OIJTDOOR Defendant. . 1 SETTLEMEN7C GRF,EMENT PAGE 02/17 This Settlement Agreement and entered into this 2.2' day of December, 2005, by and between ELLIS & CO., LTD., by and through its General Partner, ELBANCO, LLC, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Landlord") and NATIONAL ADVERTISING COW ANY d/bla VIACOM OUTDOOTt (hereinafter referred to as `°T cnanf) (collectively; the 'Parties'.), and is effective as of the date signed by the last person Hereto and the Court's ratification of same by entry of a court order ratifying and approving this. WHEREAS, on January 16, 1984, the Landlord and Tenant entered'itnto a standard lease agreement for a ten (10) year term, commencing on March 1,1984; and and WHEREAS; in 1994, the Parties renewed the lease for an additianal ten (10) year term; WHEREAS, the lease provided it would be on a yearly basis thereafter; and V+-iEIZEAS, during the renewal period that began in 2004, the Tenant and Landlord began negotiations regarding a potential, extension of the lease; and Case No.; 05-8393-CO 41 EXHIBIT A 01./13/2006 13:51 727446 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 03117 WkVIUAS, disputes arose between the Landlord and Tenant regarding whether or not an agreemmt was reached regarding the extension of the lease and other terms related thereto whicb. resulted in the captioned lawsuit being filed in the county court in and for Pinellas County, Florida, by the Landlord and against the Tenant, wherein the Landlord sought to evict the tenant based oil the Landlord's assertion of its right to terminate the lease; and WHEREAS, Tenant denied the allegations in the Complaint and asserted. of flumative defenses; and WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant have mutually decided to resolve the disputes between them in all respects by the execution of this Settlement Agreement without either party admitting liability or fault whatsoever in exchange of the considerations provided for in this Settlement Agreement; Now, THEREFORE in consideration of the premises and mutual promises, representations and warranties contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows: RECITALS AND E 'r5: The foregoing recitals and any and all exhibits attached hereto, are hereby incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof This document and all exhibits attached hereto shall be collectively referred to as the °Settlemett Agreement` 2. PROMISES. REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES ANA. GOVMANTS: (a) LANDLORD., (i) LANDLORD is the owner of the leased promises and has not assigned, transferred or otherwise conveyed to- any person, firm or corporation, any or all of its rights, interests and claims dealt with or resolved by this Settlement Agreement and/or wbicb. were or could have been raised and Ellis & Co: Ltd. V. Nahlonal Adveltieing Ce Y Case No.: 05-9343-CGAI Page 2 of 13 01/13/2006 13:51 7274468 NDRTHSIDE ENG PAGE 04117 LANDLORD has the fill power and authority to take all of the actions and make all of the promises, representations, warranties and covenants contemplated by this Settlement Agreement; (ii) LANDLORD agrees it has taken all necessary action in order to have the iegal autbority to enter into this Settlement Agreement and that the signatory to this Settlement Agreement is duly authorized to sign on behalf of the Landlord to enter into this Settlement Agreement; (iii) LANDLORD agrees that TENANT shall maintain the existing billboard on the lease premises in its present configuration provided that 'T'ENANT has prepaid to LANDLORD advance rent through May 31, 2006, -in the amount of SWEEN HUNDRED TWENTY-FM DOLLARS ($1,625.00) within seven (7) days after ratification by the Court; (iv) LANDLORD agrees to instruct its attorneys to execute the joint motion to ratify and approve this Settlement Agreement, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and to file same with the Court and to request an immediate bearing; (v) . LANDLORD agrees to instruct its attorneys to submit the agreed upon order, which is attached hereto as Exhibit B for execution by the Court ratifying, approving and reserving jurisdiction in regards of this case as more fully provided in this Settlement Agreement and in the ardcr, and (vi) LANDLORD agrees. to accept FORTY FM HUNDRED DOLLARS ($4,500.00) from TENANT, representing payment of attorneys' tees by TENANT to LANDLORD for the underlying litigation and LANDLORD m its &-co. Ud. V_ National Advertising Company Case No.: 0543934_' I e.....I..ea'l a oE,r a ra u executions, claims and demands whatsoever, it1 law or in equity, which LANDLORD ever had, now has, or which any personal representative, successor, heir or assign of LANDLORD, hereafter can, shall or may have against TENANT, from claims raised by LANDLORD, or that could hkve been raised by LANDLORD involving TENANT's outdoor billboard sign located at Gulf to Bay Plaza in Clearwater, Florida, County of Pinellas, State of Florida, and the claims in Case No. 05-8393-CO41, styled as ELLIS & CO., LTD., by and through its &neml Pamer, ELRANCO, LLC v. NATIONAL ADV.E'.RTISING COMPANY dVa VIACOM OU'T'DOOR, filed by LANDLORD in the County Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida. This Release shall be deemed to release TENANT, its agents, officers, directors, attorneys, employees, subsidiaries, parents, affiliates, successors and assigns. This Release is not intended to release T'ENANT from the terms and conditions of this Settlement Agreement until completion of its terms hereto. Mlis & Cv.-ltd. V. National Advertising Cmq my Can No.: 0543930-41 Pngc 4 of 13 to seek an immediate hearing, (iv) TENANT agrees to instruct its attorney to submit the agreed upon order attached hereto as Exbib;t B and any hearing on the motion attached hereto as Exhibit A; (v) TENANT agrees that upon execution of this Settlement Agreement and ratification by the court that it shall promptly pay, without delay, within seven (7)' days 'therca#ker, titue being of the essetlce, FORTY FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($4,500.00) in attorneys' fees, SIXTEEN HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE DOLLARS ($1,625.00) for rent from March 1,',. , 6 through May 31, 2006 and to inst*,,.4 its attorneys to cause the M9 & Co. tad. V. National Advertising Camany Case No : 05-8393-C0.41 Page 5 of 13 01/13/2006 13:51 72744685 NSRTHSIDE ENG SS PAGE 05/17 entry of all necessary orders to cause the release of the monies beld in the court registry to be released to the LANDLORD by court order together with any interest that has accrued thereon; (vi) TENANT agrees that it sball not make any changes to its existing billboard other than face changes and routine maintenance on the advertising portions of same from now through. May 31, 2006; (vii) TENANT agrees that it shall remove the billboard and any and all supporting structures and conduits, wiring, electrical devices, base and all other appnrtmances related thereto from the LANDLORD'S property on or before Tune •1, 2006; (viii) 'T'ENANT agrees that it will be solely responsible for obtaining and paying for any and all perm its necessary to cause the removable of TENANTS Personalty from the LANDLORD'S Property and TENANT is solely responsible for any and all damages done to the LANDLORD'S property or any third party TENANT property at the shopping center or that of third Parties at or near the leased premises caused by the TENANT'S removal of its personalty from the leased premises; . (ix) TENANT agrees to indemnify and hold LANDLORD harmless for any and all damages caused by TENANT to LANDLORD'S property, other. TENANTS of the LANDLORD, and third persons caused by or attributable to TENANT'S removal of its personalty from the lease pren?i.ses including payment of any attorneys' fees, costs or damages that LANDLORD could otherwise be held legally responsible for as a result of Mi., & Co. Ud_ V. National Advertising Company Case No.: 05-8393-Cp-41 Page 6 of 13 01.11312006 13:51 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG S? PAGE 06117 any actions taken or failures to act including negligence by TENANT in the removal of its personalty from the leased pren)jses which causes any damage or injury to any person or property of others; (x) TENANT agrees that if, for whatever reason, TENANT'S personalty, including the billboard, the pole, any and all electrical devices, conduits or any and all other personalty of TENANT is not removed on or before June 1, 2006, that LANDLORD shall be entitled to an immediate entry of a Final Judgment of Eviction &ud a writ of possession which would allow LANDLORD to remove TENANT'S personalty from the leased premises without further notice or hearing thereon; and TENANT sbal.l be responsible for all attomeys' fees and costs incurred by Plaintiff in connection with this litigation. (xi) TENANT agrees that it is solely responsible for its own attorney's ;Fees or court costs attributable to Case No. 522003CC008393CO-41. (xii) TENANT agrees that it shall take no action in any Settlement A.greermcnt with the City of Clearwater, Florida, pertaining 'to any and all cases by and between the TENANT and the City of Clearwater, which would in any way interfere with the purposes and intcnt of the Settlement Agreement or the TENANT'S responsibilities under this Settlement Agreement. (xiii) TENANT further agrees that in any Settlement Agreement with the City of Clearwater, Florida that it will insist upon a provision which will state that the city shall not intpose upon any owner of property upon which the billboard is located any requirement that a billboard be rem.oved for rMis & Co. Jjd- V. National Advertising Cwipny Cam No.: 05-9393-CO-41 Page 7 of 13 011.1312006 13:51 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG ? PAGE 07117 the property owner to develop or redevelop its Property. TENANT agrees that it will not sign a Settlement Agreement with the City of Clearwater, Florida without such language being included within said settlement A.gmement. (xiv) TENANT agrees that it shall not outer into any Settlement Agreement with the city of Clearwata, Florida which would purport to allow TENANT to maintain the billboard on. LANDLORD'S property beyond May 31., 2006. 3. BINDING EMCL The terms and conditions of this Settlement Agreement skull survive the execution of this Settlement Agreement and further, the execution and/or closing of any other documonts as called for under this Settlement Agreement shall further be binding upon the Parties, their respective successors and assigns. a. GOVERNING wS: This Settlement Agrememt shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The Parties hereto agree that exclusive venue with, respect to any litigation regarding this Settlement Agreement shall occur in the Circuit Court in and for Pinellas County; Florida. 5. SEVERABiLiLIY:. if any term or provision of this Settlement Agreement is determined to be illegal, unenforceable or invalid, in whole or in part for any reason, such illegal, uue&brceable or invalid provision(s) or part(s).thereof shall be stricken from this agreement and such provisiOn shall not affcet the legality, enforceability or validity of the remainder of the Settlement Agreement rf any provision or part thereof shall be stricken from this agreement in accordance with the provisions Ellis & Co. Ltd. V. National Advgt sing Cortomy Case No.: 05.8393•CO-41 Page 8 of 13 01/13/2006 13:51 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 08/17 of this section, then the stricken provision shall be replaced, to the extent possible, with a legal, enforceable and valid provision that is similar in tenor to the stricken provision as is legally possible. 6. TINvz ISO THE ESSl_ Time is of the essence in respect to all provisions of this Settlement Agreement that specify a time for perfotza =ce; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not be construed to limit or deprive a patty of the benefits of any grace or use period allowed in this Settlement Agreement. SURVIVAL: Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Settlement Agreement, promises, representations, warranties and covenants contained in this Settlement Agreement or in. any instrument or exhibit hereto, shall survive this Settlement Agreement. 9. AMMIGUITIES• Each party and its counsel have fully participated in the review and revision of this Settlement Agreement. Any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in lintetpzeting this Settlement Agreement. The languagc of this Settlement Agreement shall be ixtte3rpreted as to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against either party. 9. WAIVER: No waiver of a breach, failure, of any condition, of any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Settlement A.grccmcnt shall be ebbective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, Ellis & Co.. IA. V. National Advefting Compney Casc Na.: 0S-8393fib-31 Page 9 of. 11 01/13/2006 13:51 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 09117 failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, shall constitute a conti mling waiver unless it in writing so specifies. 10. HEADWGS: The headings in this Settlement Agreement are included for convenience only and shall neither affect the construction or interpretation of any provision i1a this Settlement Agreement, nor affect any of the rights and/or obligations of the Parties to this Settlement Agreement. 11. NECESSARY ACTS FUR R ASSURANCES: The panics shall, at their own cost, and expense, execute and deliver such further documents and instruments, and shall take such other actions as may be reasonably necessary, required or appropriate to evidence or carry out the intent and purposes of this Settlement Agreement; 12. EXECUTION: This Settlement Agreement may be executed in counterparts and by facsimile provided the originals of the Settlement Agreement are eventually delivered, as required by the Settlement Agreement. 13. ATT'ORNEY'S FEE In the event of any litigation between the patties hereto, the prevailing pasty shall be entitled to recover against any non-prevailing party its respective attorney's fees and costs. In addition to any legal remedies provided by law, any party hereto may seek a court order for spccific performance. 14. NOS Any notice required or permitted to be given. hereunder shall be given in writing and shall be delivered: (a) in person.; (b) via certified /mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested; (c) Ellis & Co- Ltd. Y. National Advcrt sing Casrany Case No_-. 05-8393-CO-41 page 10 of 13 01/13/2006 13:51 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 11117 understandings or agrceznents of the Parties. This Settlement Agrc =cnt may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior or contemporaneous statements or agreements unless they arc specifically referenced herein. No party has bem induced to enter into this Settlement Agreement by, nor is any party relying' upont anY rVr8scntatian, understanding, agreement, commitment or warranty outside those expressly set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Settlement Agreement this 10"^day of December, 2005. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS ELLIS & CO., LTD., by and through its general partner, ELBANCO, LLC, CAROL E. MARTIN Its: Chief Executive Officer The foregoing instrttment was acknowledged before me this 2-y of December, 2005, by CAROL E. MARTIN, Chief Executive Officer of ELLIS & CO., LTD.', by and through its general partner, ELBANCO, LLC, Personally Known OR Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced Dm"Rwa MM& movate 14, 2007 MNRWk Signature, NStary Public Ellis & Co. JAd. V. National Advir6aing Company C'.aae No.: 05.8393-CO-a t Page 12 of 13 01/13/2006 13:51 727446 NORTHSIDE ENG * PAGE 12/17 (Wul 9uc , STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY d/b/a VIACOM OUTDOOR By: Alft, I e fore oing insftment was acknowledged before me this Z?Wdqy of December, 2005, by its 11?? 1?-e 5e of NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY d/b/a VIACOM OUTDOOR. ' Personally Known V/OR Produced Identification Type of Identification Prodwed cn+?in?s (SEAL) tro?rir Ri!>rc • iMOM o1 t?oexfa _. caomr++anBplwOse11,7?v Cammialen a a?r?? , bn4agor N arl I F1 Nalls?rhn sign dm, Notary Public RICHARD T. HEIDEN, P.A. By: Ric T. Heide Esquire 31640 U.S. Highway 19 North; Suite Q Palm Harbor, FL 34684 (727) 771-7888!(727) 771-7899(fax) FBN: 910661 DATE: r ?I 3G ?G? WD MCCLWKY SMITH SCHLTS'1'ER & RUSSELL. P.A. FBN: 194980 P.O, ,Box 1900 Dort Lauderdale, FL 33302.1900 (954)527-2466/(954)3334066 Counsel 'four NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY, d/b/a VIACOM OUTDOOR DATE: Z-9-a. S' Ellis do Co: Ltd. V, National Advertising Compmy Cm No.: 054393-CO-41 pap 13 of 13 " Steven W. Marcus, Esquire 01/13/2006 13:51 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 13/17 IN THE COUNTY COURT FOR THE S1 CrH R MICLAL. DISTRICT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLOWDA ELLIS & CO., LTD., by and through its General Partner, ELBANCO, LLC, Plaintiff VS. NA77ONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY We VIACOM OUTDOOR Defendant. Case No.: 05-8393-CO-41 JQINT MOTION TO RATIFY AMAZEVE S 'L" 1 MME AGMEMENT AND 4M&RV_AM01ti'-JU1USDICTI0N COMES NOW, the Plaintiff ELLIS & CO., LTD., by and through its general partner, ELDANCO, LLC, and Defendant, NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY Wa VIACOM OUTDOOR, by and through their undersiped attorneys and files this, their joint motion for the Court to approve the Settlement Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference and as grounds therefore would state as follows: 1. The Plaintiff and Defendant have voluntarily entcred into the Settlement Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. The Parties hereto request that Court execute the agreed upon Order, attached hereto as Exhibit R, ratifying and approving the Settlement Agreement and reseMug jurisdiction for the Court to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 3. This Settlement Agreement has been approved by the parties to this Settlement Agreement and the Parties have taken all necessary action in ordei to request that EXHIBIT A 01/13/2006 13:51 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 14117 this Court approve a valid and binding Settlement Agreement between the respective Pailies. RICHARD T. HEIDEN, P.A.. By: Richard T. Heiden, Esquire 31640 U.S. Highway 19 North, Suite 4 Palm Harbor, FL 34684 (727) 771-7888/(727) 771-7899(fax) FBN: 910661 xtUDEN MCCIASKY SWM SCEIUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. By: 'th, Esquire P1605334 Steven W. Mucus, Esquire FBN: 194980 P.O. Box 1900 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33302-1900 (954)527-24661(954)333-4066 Counsel for NATIONAL. ADVERTISING cowANY d/Wa VIACOM OUTDOOR DATE: ` hd6T-- DATE: d EMUDIT A Eris & CQ_ Vd. V, Ndioned Advertise g Compmty Coe No.: 05-8393-CO-41 Paga2of2 01!1312006 13:51 72744680 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 15/17 e ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this Court has made sufficimt i0quiry of the Parties and their counsel to determine that this Settlement Agreement was entered into fieely and voluntarily and this settlement serves the interest of all Parties and it is Anther; ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this Courtreserves jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement and to hold any necessary future hearings including entry of. additional orders, including a writ of possession in the event that the Defendant fails to comply with the* terms of the Settlement +A sreement, by failing to remove its personalty form the Plaintifrs premises on or before dune 1, 2006 and it is further; oRDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the clerk of Court is hereby directed to relcam any and all fimds, including any interest that has swmed on said fuw,ds held ita the registry of the Court, with a check made payable to ELLIS AND CO., LTD., with that check being mailed to Richard T. Heiden, P.A., 31640 US Highway 19 North, Palm harbor, FL 34684, and any clerk fee shall be paid by Defendant and it is fiuther, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREW that once the Defendant has complied with all terms, provisions and covenants of the Settlement Agreement or any Orders of this Court, the Plaintiff shall dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers this day of December, 2005. MYRA, SCOTT MCNA RY COUNTY COURT NDGE Copies furnished to. Richard T. Heiden, Esquire Glenn N Smith, Esquire rUis do Co. W. V. NnUooa) Advertising Company CaseNo.- 054393-COAI Pnge 2 of 2 01/13/2006 13:51 72744686 vJl ravvv lr.v? rna fFlfTl IOQ? fe?,69,??F Y!t/7GLl 93"'?X NORTHSIDE ENG NOW 9009/60/TO IN MP PMMLIM COUNTY, MA Er= & CAD„ LTD.. 1{y aad ftagh ift ocnaml m AxCO. LLq e Pb" Cm No- 0-93934)0-41 VS^ t PAGE 16/17 JA 0,02 NATIONAL ADVMVxM c bw"y dwa, V ACOM CKIW()ORl Demdm6L TM CAUSE arm= to be bowd on f??ointmot?pn o da<? BLLIS& COI Z'3., by wd & uughits OfteW PmMw, =BOO?, LLCF od, 4 NATIONJkLADMTED0 C OWANYdflxla VIA"OLTM WR, by KW1bWWJ1#1rWWped? ffie c to i r?$? aad approva ? S? a? sazd to ?eesvQ}?onta+?rfu?wre oad?a and t?,4 Court bALvhv rc+v'i d?,a 3OMemW ?t and the mcdoli and f Ending saw to be of good legal fotm and othcrw Wing fuller MvLmd ba the pwA mm, ft is lmmbv; ()RDA, Cow tbis Ordkw oud tau T??EDA?DXIE? tbattlu'? cssei9 russed?dthstt? mt+o hold Mum heniop sad to r mmh ova os noo to tuffs ee is GRAMM and the S ematment ?edto tbC mod=wI i5 filed with WS Court id hoby app mved. ratified aod by the 0t&rxoft& on ordrar after Coat; it fu ftut?rr, e O"EOBD, AMD19CZE tht thePgtd=am mdmod tocartpbrwlthtbe *=I' tpf this ScWcmxW 1A'Srftmmt aad it is ituthm. 01113/2006 13:51 727446 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 17117 UX? !LUUU 17: 31 rAh Z'f'ffa 1cj.s,nww nssi?tr?r re t?CJVljd MOT On. 9002/80 ITU U DEMP9 AD MDGED AM DEC IM OOt tho Coat bu made ftf 5Q=t bq.uifF of t7ag pacow Md tht* aowwj to det=ujw tWo SaWonmt A. mat vme enft"d kft Owlyr and vobrn utgy Qis sodmcnt mm the inu mt of A ltrties aad it is fiuther; 1)1lDE?.dl, ? ? that Court rtser+vea jurisdittion ? the tem ofdte &Weviv t A&==ei;t and to hold my neee y fimm hmbp hwlu&ug enw of auffioul +d=, inclukV a wft* of poaaeasitm in tt =me that tha Delp d= Ms in amply nth the tmw of the 9attle6mt Adamant, by f ift to mmove its pm-wWty Mm the PIaWffs preffiaes on tie % JT a a 10 20(W ski It is ftthw, i ORD D, A$JiTDCM AM DMIM tha the clerk of Cent is hembyr dk=W to slylea= any and all fimik tw1wrag. tatty Werat dmtbas ==ue4 on mid finxio held im tk *nS isty of i the court, w ft It ebeekimnde p oblO to MJ.IS AND CO.* LIML, v ft *t ehwk being umtled. to l ioha T. Tdeideroy, P.A f, 3l STS lEe l g Need palm 1 ? FL 346z4,* Md anyOjwk f= shall be pmM by Deftd?mt emd, it is farthcr UID J,1o AD WOW AND DEMMD that ooca tbo? Amt bas complied with all twnx%provieiom and oiri?exmats offie S at=AAxm=es<it w aW Ord= off * C=30, the I?WM its" shall ithmiss the lawmAwitli pild ndlce. f DOM AND JOgD In Chem this JAN. COOOS ftawhw : Richard T. HeMM xe ()Jem i r Sm th, a?sy : Hiss. &CM Lid V. Nakod A&tl&ft CBigPEPY CgwXae 05830CO41 Plq 2 an 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 6:42 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Cc: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: FLS2005-12098, 501-525 Belcher Road Doreen - Attached is the Draft January 5, 2006, DRC comments for the above case. The scheduled time for this case is 1:45 pm. Wayne Ina, draft 1.5.06 dre action agenda... NorthsiJe CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: December 9, 2005 To: Sherry Watkins, Admin. Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: Gulf to Bay Plaza - 501 - 525 S. Belcher Rd NES Proj# 570 We Transmit: Enclosed Under Separate Cover X Originals Mail UPS Overnight X Prints Pick-Up X Hand Delivered Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Per Your Request For Your Review & Comment Floppy Disk X For Your Use For Your Approval For Your Files For Your Information Copies Date Description 15 Architectural Sheets A4.1 Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: Angel ai es, Execu ive Admin. Assistant Copies To: FILE N. Pelzer D. Williams 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 LL ? CITY OF CLARWATER ° ClearWater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER. COM December 08, 2005 Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, Fl 33755 RE: FLS2005-12098 -- 501- 525 S BELCHER RD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Northside Engineering Services Inc. : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-12098. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on January 05, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, /L M, WtJ21Z Wa. e Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLS2005-12098 - 501- 525 S BELCHER RD • L F_ I Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 5:06 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FW: FLS2005-12098, 501-525 S. Belcher Rd. Doreen - Revised letter (addressed to you rather than Ellis & Co. LTD). Wayne letter of .mpleteness 12.8.05 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:51 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLS2005-12098, 501-525 S. Belcher Rd. Doreen - Attached is the Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project (note application number). This letter is predicated on the Traffic Study being submitted by Friday, December 16, 2005. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne llilij letter of ,mpleteness 12.8.05 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:51 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLS2005-12098, 501-525 S. Belcher Rd. Doreen - Attached is the Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project (note application number). This letter is predicated on the Traffic Study being submitted by Friday, December 16, 2005. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne 15, d letter of ,mpleteness 12.8.05 Horthside 15"a" smi&a 1(o. December 7, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-11113 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd. Gulf to Bay Plaza - NES #570 Dear Mr. Wells: • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • Please find listed below responses to the letter of incompleteness dated December 5, 2005. 1. A Flexible Standard Application is provided. 2. No plat is required, parcels will be leased. Please refund $730.00. 3. Vacation Application is to be submitted. 4. See revised Sheet L1.1. 5. All areas are dimensioned. 6. Rear setback has been corrected on the site data table. 7. Additional loading zone has been added on Sheet C3.1. 8. All interior landscaped areas have been crosshatched. 9. See Sheet C3.1 for outdoor lighting. 10. All overhangs and columns are shown on C3.1. 11. See revised Sheet Ll.1. 12. All Landscape areas are curbed. 13. See architectural plans. 14. All proposed freestanding signs have been denoted on plans. 15. Gulf Coast Consulting is working to provide a Traffic Impact Study. 16. Application has been revised to reflect Northside Engineering Services Inc. as the agent. This should satisfy the incompleteness of the above project. If you have any additional comments, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Doreen A. Williams Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ORIGINAL RECENED DEC 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Northside • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • C_,?:_?? sm&a 106, ENVIRONMENTAL ?j • ? TRANSPORTATION • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: December 8, 2005 To: Sherry Watkins, Admin. Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: 501 - 525 S. Belcher Rd / FLS2005-11113 NES Proj# 570 We Transmit: Enclosed Under Separate Cover Mail UPS Overnight Pick-Up X Hand Delivered Per Your Request For Your Review & Comment X For Your Use For Your Approval For Your Files For Your Information X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Date Description 1 Response Letter 15 FLS Application 15 Reduced Civil and Landscape Plans 15 Sets (5 Sheets) of Civil and Landscape Plans Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By !L!? oreen A. Williams, Project Director Copies To: FELE N. Pelzer A. Haines 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRIN6.COM N.ESTECH@MINDSPRIN6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 - 8036 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 08 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • Clearwater December 05, 2005 Trish Rodebaugh 1733 W Fletcher Ave Tampa, FI 33612 • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W .MYCLEARWATER. COM RE: FLD2005-11113 -- 501- 525 S BELCHER RD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Trish Rodebaugh : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-1 1 1 1 3. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. Unclear why a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application was filed. Based on the standards in the Commercial District, need to refile a completed Flexible Standard application. Based on the site plan showing two outparcels, need to plat the property and file a Preliminary Plat along with the Flexible Standard Development application ($600 application fee - Note: Downgrading from a FLD to a FLS reduces that fee from $1205 to $475, or a difference of $730. If you desire, we could just refund the overall difference of $130 rather than submitting a check for $600 and us refunding $730. Please advise as to how to handle fees.) Alternately, if these two "outparcels" are not to be sold and are really "lease areas," then a Preliminary Plat application is not necessary but need to label them as "lease area #1" and "lease area #2." No property lines would be shown (see outparcel #1) (potentially lease lines). 3. Site plan Sheet C2.1 indicates the proposal is to include the vacation of a 10-foot wide utility easement. Need to submit a completed vacation application form to Steve Doherty in the Engineering Department ASAP. 4. Proposal does not fully comply with the foundation landscaping requirement of a five-foot width along the front of both retail building frontages of Section 3-1202.E.2. Also unclear as to compliance with the requirement of 10 percent of the vehicular use area in interior landscaping per Section 3-1202.E.1. Need to fully comply and/or submit a completed Comprehensive Landscape Program application. 5. Sheet C2.1 - Need to dimension the following (all typical and non-typical circumstances): sidewalks (also sidewalk widths in front of proposed retail businesses); width of foundation landscape areas; width of drive-thru and bypass lanes; length and depth of buildings; interior and terminal landscape islands; stall end to mid front of stall for angled spaces (see diagram in Section 3-1402.A); and loading spaces. 6. Sheet C1.1 - Indicate in the Site Data Table a rear setback (required is 10-20 feet for an FLS). South and east behind shopping center are rear setbacks. 7. Code requires a minimum of three loading spaces to be provided. Indicate location and size. 8. Depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-11113 - 501- 525 S BELCHER RD • Clearwater December 05, 2005 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM 9. Show the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures (parking lot light poles should be coordinated with proposed landscaping to avoid future shielding of lighting by tree canopy - applies to freestanding signage also). 10. Show on Sheet C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 all structural overhangs and columns. 11. Need to delineation and dimension all required perimeter landscape buffers on Sheet L1.1 (north along Gulf to Bay Blvd = 15-foot buffer; west along Belcher Rd = 15-foot buffer; along south property line = five-foot buffer adjacent to office and 10-foot buffer adjacent to multi-family; along east property line = five-foot buffer; along south property line behind Retail A = 10-foot buffer; along east property line behind Grocery Store and Retail B = 10-foot buffer). 12. Need to curb all landscaped areas (except front of parking spaces where wheel stops are provided). Indicate type and size of curbing material. 13. Sheet A4.1 - Need to indicate the height of the building to top of highest roof deck for all buildings; need to indicate the height of parapets (from highest roof deck); need to indicate height of hip roofed structures from highest roof deck to top of hip roof. 14. Need to indicate on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 the location of proposed freestanding signs (understanding that a Comprehensive Sign Program and separate sign permits will be submitted later), so as to review based on relationship to other site and landscaping improvements. 15. Need to submit a Traffic Impact Study, including a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. 16. Application lists Trish Rodebaugh with RMC Property Group as "agent," however, the affidavit signed from Ellis & Co. Ltd. authorizes Housh Ghovaee of Northside Engineering to act as "agent." Need to decide who will be agent and revise application/affidavit appropriately. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 9:00 am on Thursday, December 8, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne. Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wavnrells /,,? - we& Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-11113 - 501- 525 S BELCHER RD FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ; s 14ae(?e-,_-, FAX: 8-13 - I & 3 - 2--T-1 to Phone: ? 13 - / 6 D 51lr+ K z-)-"u FROM: Wi0my\p- th Phone: 72-7 4 DATE:.- L d a r RE: f. L4 nor. 1 t (1 3 So I - L? 3 eC,Pr- . MESSAGE: _? NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) I Sm • Dec. 05 2005 10:11AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98139632596 Dec.05 10:10AM 01'21 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). Wells, Wayne From: System Administrator To: 'trodebaugh@rmcpg.com' Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:04 AM Subject: Undeliverable:FLD2005-11113, 501-525 Belcher Rd Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FLD2005-11113, 501-525 Belcher Rd Sent: 12/5/2005 10:04 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'trodebaugh@rmcpg.com' on 12/5/2005 10:04 AM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. <msb-eml-2.clearwater-fl.com #5.5.0 smtp;550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable> • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:04 AM To: 'todebaugh@rmcpg.com' Cc: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-11113, 501-525 Belcher Rd Ms Rodebaugh - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. The original will be sent to you via post office. Please resubmit by 9:00 am on Thursday, December 8, 2005. Wayne r, letter of completeness 12.5.. Norths?E CIVIL• LAND PLANNING• ENV[ RONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: Gulf to Bay & Belcher NES Proj# 0570 We Transmit: X X_ X Enclosed Under Separate Cover Mail UPS Overnight Pick-Up X Hand Delivered X ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 3 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Originals Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 1 Check #908 for $1,205 15 Flex Development Application (Cornp. Infill) 15 Letter of Authorization & Affidavits 15 Warranty Deeds 15 Surveys (1 signed and sealed) 15 Stormwater Report & Narrative (1 signed and sealed) 15 Tree Inventory & Report 15 Civil & Landscape Drawings (5 sheets) 15 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan 15 8.5" X 11" Colored Landscape Plan 15 8.5 X 11" Colored Renderings 15 8.5 X 11" Building Elevations 1 Color chi attached to Original Arc. Drawing 15 24 X 36 Architectural Drawings Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. en A. Williams, Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NE5ADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH «MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Copies to: FILE N. Pelzer A. Haines 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:25 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: GULF TO BAY/BELCHER PLAZA Wayne - Do you know anything about this sidewalk? Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Gomez, Robin Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:58 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: GULF TO BAY/BELCHER PLAZA Not sure if you are the correct area for my observation & question, if not, if you would please forward to the correct area: Driving by the plaza on the SE corner of Belcher Rd & Gulf to Bay Blvd, where the new Publix just opened, I noticed that there is not a sidewalk where there used to be one adjacent to the plaza driveway entrance off Belcher Rd (there is a traffic light*at this driveway entrance & Belcher Rd). I believe the previous sidewalk most likely belonged to the plaza owner(s), not the City due to its location adjacent to the driveway entrance. Is the plaza developer required to place a sidewalk in this area (again, where used to be one). Here is an image with the previous design: PublicWorks_ b-gis-int140039 Thank you. Robin 1. Gomez CITY OF CLEARWATER, FL City Auditor & Hispanic-Latino Liaison 727-562-4550 .The Mission of the City of Clearwater is to provide cost-effective municipal services and infrastructure necessary for a high quality of life for all our citizens." 9 0 Wells, Wayne Subject: Publix Belcher Road Location: PW 440 Bldg 111 Conf Room Start: Mon 5/21/2007 1:30 PM End: Mon 5/21/2007 2:30 PM Recurrence: (none) Meeting will include Jim McClain, owner's rep and Jeff Sellers, developer for RMC sp 5/17/07 Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 5:24 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Belcher/Gulf to Bay FYI -----Original Message----- From: Quillen, Michael Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 11:34 AM To: Bertels, Paul; Clayton, Gina Subject: Belcher/Gulf to Bay There is an FDOT storm inlet at the SE corner of the intersection which would need to be taken into consideration when designing a turn lane. No other utility conflicts. Michael D. Quillen, P.E. Director of Engineering City of Clearwater mich ael. qu illen(amycleai-water. corn 727-562-4743 aTb 4 D --- 6-061n? -- a-_- -ffn ?et{P?w( ?e?uw?w_use_avett- CG4R::T-%-- Jlcp_4_ue?l? • j 3 j! al? AML TIP-6MKT-4 F-k?t ) ?-C C &4-U n ? ?,;) - -, 464--336-f )Ft-(6? -44 3 - 2-ki? I 44 (e 0 - of () -o,- f s6?- lee5 7 ?3 Engineering Condition Conditions Associated With FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Steve Doherty 562-4773 12/22/2005 1. Applicant shall submit a complete vacation application for the 10-foot drainage and utility Met easement prior to issuance of the Development Order. 4/14/06 - MET 2. How will water and sewer be provided for Lease Area #1? 4/14/06 - THE REVISED UTILITY PLAN SHOWS TWO OPTIONS FOR SANITARY CONNECTIONS, BUT NO WATER SERVICE? 7/31/06 - See Note on Sheet C5.1. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit: 4/14/06 - ACKNOWLEDGED 2. A net increase in water meter sizes for this site will require payment of water and sewer impact fees. 3. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from D.O.T. 4. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County. 5. Need a copy of an approved D.E.P. permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Will building be provided with fire sprinkler systems? If yes, show location of all Fire Department Connections. 7. If required, any additional fire hydrant assembly shall be installed to meet Fire Department Regulations. A fire hydrant assembly cannot be restricted by any backflow prevention device. All applicable fees shall be paid by applicant. 8. Provide applicable details for dumpster enclosures; new dumpster enclosures: Maximum 6'-0" high and constructed of concrete block. Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building, see City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701. 9. Demolition permit shall include cutting and capping the existing sanitary sewer connection to manhole in Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 10. If an unrestricted fire line is required, applicant shall convey a water line easement to the City. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Heather Faessle 562-4897 12/15/2005 Dry Detention systems must contain a grassed bottom and designed with no steeper than 4:1 side Met slope. Provide cross-section for the pond(s). Fire Condition James Keller 562-4327 x3062 12/18/2005 Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an Met adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO DO. 4-18-2006 Calculations provided. ( JFK ) Print Date: 05/02/2007 CaseConditons Page 1 of 18 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD • Fire Condition Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3062 12/18/2005 FDC's are required, and shall be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant Met within 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve. PRIOR TO DO 4-18-2006 FDC for building ' A' shows the fire riser but does not show the location of the new FDC for this building. (JFK) 8-1-2006 FDC shown on revised set of plans. 12/18/2005 Provide and show on the site plan 24 ft width at driveways / drive aisles for emergency vehicle Met ingress and egress for front and rear parking lots. Where drive way is split by an island with one-way traffic each side of island provide and show on site plan minimum 20 ft width driveway on each side or remove island to provide required width. PRIOR TO DO 4-18-2006 The driveway located at the west end on the north side shows a island which has to have a minimum of 20 feet in width on each side.(JFK). 8-3-06 The island in the west drive on Gulf To bay MUST be 20' on each side of the island for Fire Vehicle Access. If you choose to remove the Island you can have a 24' width.(JFK) 8-17-2006 Letter did not address the Drive on Gulf to Bay to be stripped. This will be going to the D.O.T. per Doreen from Northside August 31,2006 and this is a condition for our approval. (JFK) 8/31/2006 Revised set of plans has the island REMOVED. (JFK) 12/18/2005 Relocate exsisting fire hydrant located east of west entrance off Gulf To Bay to the entrance for a more direct usage PRIOR TO DO 4-18-2006 Hydrant was relocated in the wrong direction, went East on the plan, should have gone West and relocate to west side of drive entrance.(JFK) 8-1-2006 Revised set of plans has met the requirement. (JFK) Harbor Master Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/27/2005 No issues. Landscape 10% Interior Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/27/2005 7/31/06 - WW See additional Landscape Review Condition regarding interior landscaping dated 7/31/06. 5/11/06 - WW The required and provided interior green space area is not indicated in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1 as requested, but as indicated in the response letter dated January 11, 2006 (submitted April 11, 2006). Sheet C2.1 has been revised to remove the square footage of interior green space provided. Interior green space areas must meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 to qualify as interior green space. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10 parking spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft. and be 8 feet wide of green space from back of curb to back of curb (inside curbing). Many islands do not meet the minimum width requirement, nor the area requirement. One island west of Publix (with a cart return) is indicated as nine-foot wide, but is much greater in width. Indicate the width of each island, unless a typical width, and the square footage of each interior landscaped area. Interior landscaping is lacking in the area west of Publix, due to the parking space widths exceeding Code Print Date: 05/02/2007 Met Met Met CaseConditons Page 2 of 18 0 01 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Landscape 10% Interior Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 minimum requirement. Suggest reducing the width of parking spaces to the minimum requirement to meet the minimum landscape island widths. Staff will not support a reduction to the minimum interior green space requirement. Staff, however, would support a reduction to required number of parking spaces below five spaces per 1,000 sf. On Sheet C3.1 it appears that interior landscaping areas are attempted to be indicated with shading, however, there is no legend to indicate the shading is such. Include in the legend on Sheet C3.1. Landscape It appears that the large island north of Publix is being counted toward interior landscaping, but a review of the landscaping on Sheet 1-1.1 only indicates extremely minimal landscaping, such that the landscaping proposed doesn't qualify this large island for the full square footage of interior green space you may be attempting to calculate. A large island at the southeast corner of Retail "B" is also apparently being counted toward interior landscaping, but the landscape plan Sheet 1-1.1 does not show hardly any landscaping within this island, where it wouldn't qualify for the total square footage of the island. Revise. 12/27/05 - WW Per Section 3-1202.E.1 Code requires a minimum of 10% interior green space of gross vehicular use area (VUA). Based on the proposed VUA listed in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1, there should be 22,399 square feet of interior green space provided. Need to provide in the Site Data table the required and provided interior green space. Sheet C2.1 indicates 12,190 sf of interior green space provided. Interior green space areas must meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 to qualify as interior green space. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10 parking spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft. and be 8 feet wide of green space from back of curb to back of curb. Many islands do not meet the minimum width requirement. Parking space widths exceed Code minimum requirement. Suggest reducing the width of parking spaces to the minimum requirement to meet the minimum landscape island widths. Staff will not support a reduction to the minimum interior green space requirement. Staff would support a reduction to required number of parking spaces below five spaces per 1,000 sf. Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/27/2005 Dimension the width of interior and terminal green space islands (many are not a typical width). Met 12/27/2005 7/28/06 - WW Met See separate comment. 5/11/06 - WW Widths of foundation landscape areas still not dimensioned. Dimension such on Sheet C3.1. Foundation areas north and west side of Retail A has not been landscaped in accordance with Code requirements on Sheet 1-1.1. Provide an explanation why the areas adjacent to sidewalk ramps are proposed to be planted with sod rather than groundcover plants as the rest of the foundation areas. Otherwise, modify to groundcover plants. 12/27/05 - WW Dimension the width of the foundation landscape areas. Must plant the foundation landscape areas per Code requirements of Section 3-1202.E.2. Care should be given to location of required trees to avoid shielding attached signage (views from roadways and/or parking areas). 12/27/2005 Indicate on the Site Plan Sheet C2.1 and the Landscape Plan Sheet 1-1.1 the location of existing Met trees and indicate which trees are to be preserved and removed. 12/27/2005 Based on the existing and proposed buffer width along the east (rear) property line behind the Met grocery store and Retail B and the proposed buffer width along the south property line (south of CaseConditons Print Date: 05/02/2007 Page 3 of 18 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 Retail B), it appears that existing trees can be preserved. Revise the landscape plan to show these trees to remain and show trees to be planted in areas where the existing tree canopy will provide for new tree growth (do not plant new trees under the existing tree canopy of trees to be preserved). 12/27/2005 Sheet C2.1 - Show the landscape terminal island at the northeast corner of Lease Area #1 to be Met curbed. 12/27/2005 In order to preserve the proposed landscaping along the south side of Lease Area #1 during Met construction of the improvements on Lease Area #1, suggest installing a vertical curb along the north side of the landscape strip. 12/27/2005 1/5/06 - WW - At the DRC meeting, the condition was changed to: Met As previously recommended prior to submittal, revise Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 to show the installation of a six-foot high vinyl PVC fence along the east and south property lines behind the shopping center adjacent to the condominiums to the south and the mobile home park to the east and south. Incorporate gates for continued pedestrian access to the condominiums and mobile home park at the locations indicated. 12/27/05 - WW As previously recommended prior to submittal, revise Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 to show the installation of a six-foot high masonry wall along the east and south property lines behind the shopping center adjacent to the condominiums to the south and the mobile home park to the east and south. A post and lintel system should be employed to minimize damage to existing trees and their root systems that should be preserved along those property lines. Incorporate gates for continued pedestrian access to the condominiums and mobile home park at the locations indicated. 12/27/2005 Sheet C2.1 - Curb the north half of the interior landscape island proposed at the northwest corner Met of Lease Area #1 and curb the east end of the parking area south of Lease Area #2. 12/27/2005 7/31/06 - WW Met Response letter says the drainage outfall pipe has been relocated; however, it looks as though it is in the same place as the last submittal. This drainage outfall pipe now creates issues for trees within the interior landscape islands. Could this pipe be moved to the ends of the parking spaces and interior landscape islands (next to the drive aisle)? 5/12/06 - WW The drainage outfall pipe has now been moved eastward, which now creates issues for trees within the interior landscape islands. Could this pipe be moved to the ends of the parking spaces and interior landscape islands (next to the drive aisle)? Additionally, now a sanitary sewer line from Gulf to Bay is proposed to provide sanitary sewer service to Lease Area #1, running in the same location as the previous drainage outfall pipe. Can this pipe be run down the north/south drive aisle or be moved next to the west property line so that landscaping will not be planted directly over the pipe and the roots from the proposed trees will not impact the pipe? Also, the sanitary sewer pipe is being run right through Tree #18 at the northwest corner of Lease Area #1, which is supposedly being preserved (?). 12/27/06 - WW Coordinate the location of the retention pond outfall pipe along Belcher Road with the proposed landscaping, as it appears that the proposed landscaping is being place over the top of the pipe. Relocate the pipe closer to Belcher Road (Sheet C3.1), since it is better to have the landscaping closer to the pavement. 12/27/2005 8/7/06 - WW Met See separate comments. 5/14/06 - WW IN ADDITION TO THE NOTES BELOW, I COUNT ONLY 15 WE, WHERE YOU COUNT 16. REVISE. Print Date: 05/02/2007 CaseConditons Page 4 of 18 Landscape FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/27/05 - WW Sheet L1.1 -Landscape Table: a. I only count 1149 VS, however, the row of VS behind the grocery store and Retail B along the east property line is not indicated how many are in this row; 5/14/06 -1 NOW COUNT 861. THERE WAS A ROW OF 36 ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE CONDOS THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED (DON'T KNOW WHY). b. Relocate the landscape code name and quantities under the words "retention area" on both areas along Gulf to Bay Blvd., as I cannot read them; 5/14/06 - MET c. Move the proposed DH and XA into the actual interior landscape island north of the northern driveway on Belcher Road; 5/14/06 - MET d. I count 924 PJ, where you only say 894. Check/revise; 5/14/06 - MET (CHANGED OUT) e. I only count 32 MG, where you say 34; however, there are two trees with the symbol of MG south of the eastern retention pond not labeled. Revise; 5/14/06 - MET (CHANGED OUT) f. I only count 338 VA, where you say 364. Check/revise; 5/14/06 - I COUNT 344, WHERE YOU COUNT ONLY 308. REVISE. g. I only count 23 LT, where you say 25. Check/revise; 5/14/06 - MET h. I count 791 MJ, where you say 780. Check/revise; 5/14/06 - I COUNT 490, WHERE YOU COUNT 440. REVISE. i. I only count 16 DH, where you say 19. However, to the rear of Retail B next to the dumpster it appears one DH not counted, as well as one DH appears to the west side of the western retention pond next to Belcher Road not counted. Check/revise; and 5/14/06 - MET j. I only count 399 XA, where you say 446. Check/revise. 5/14/06 -1 COUNT 440, WHERE YOU COUNT 472. REVISE. 12/27/2005 5/14/06 - WW Met This comment needs to be re-reviewed in light of the percentage of interior landscaping provided, which has not been provided at this point. See other comments. 12/27/05 - WW Section 3-1202.E.1 requires one shade tree per 150 sf of required interior green space. Two accent trees (crape myrtle and ligustrum tree) equal one shade tree; three palms equal one shade tree. Some islands, which should have two shade trees only have one accent tree or three palms, which does not meet the Code requirement. Revise. 12/27/2005 8/24/06 - WW Met Need to plant palms or accent trees within the foundation landscaping adjacent to Retail "A," strategically located between units to minimize blocking of signage. Foundation landscape area on the northwest side needs to be widened. Adjacent sidewalk is excessively wide (10 feet wide) and there are no unit entrance doors on this side. Reduce to five feet in width and convert the balance to foundation landscaping. Convert ramp with wings to a flat area (with textured finish) with a ramp at 90-degrees to the flat area. Recommend railings along ramp to assist handicapped individuals. See me for details. 7/31/06 & 5/14/06 - WW Foundation width not dimensioned. Foundation landscaping not shown on north and northwest side of Retail "A". Suggest grouping palms west of Retail "B" to not block attached signage. 12/27/05 - WW Section 3-1202.E.2 requires foundation landscaping to have a landscape area at least five-foot wide and have at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade (facing the street). Landscape plan is deficient. Revise. 05/15/2006 7/31/06 - WW Met Accent trees are missing from two areas north and south of northern freestanding sign where 12 VA" are shown. Add two accent trees to each area. 5/15/06 - WW There exist overhead utility lines along Belcher Road that are not being placed underground. As such, only accent trees should be planted within 20 feet of the overhead lines to prevent the need CaseConditons Print Date: 05/02/2007 Page 5 of 18 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD • Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 to trim the trees away from the overhead lines. Remember: Two accent trees equal one shade tree. Revise. Suggest relocating some of the shade trees to the north side of the parking lot adjacent to the retention pond. 05/15/2006 Sheet 1-1.1 - Relocate proposed trees away from water meter bank for Retal "A." Met 07/31/2006 Sheet 1-1.1 - Proposed trees have been relocated away from water meter bank for Retal "A." Met However, this buffer still needs one tree per 35 feet of buffer area and since there are overhead power lines along this southern area, only accent trees can be planted along this southern edge (two accent trees = one shade tree). Revise. 07/31/2006 8/24/06 - WW Met Interior landscaping increased to 9.0%. Based on Comprehensive Landscape Program and the landscaping proposed for the entire site, and after discussion with Neil Thompson, the reduction is approved. 7/31/06 - WW Site Data table indicates only 7.36% interior landscaping provided, whereas 10% is required (22,399 square feet); however, some areas have been counted that shouldn't and some areas haven't been counted that could. The area that cannot be counted is the lane divider in the northern driveway on Belcher Road (it is within the front perimeter buffer). The area on the south side of Retail "B" can be counted, as well as a portion of the landscape area on the north side of the easternmost parking row adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd north of Retail "A" (but the perimeter buffer west of the eastern driveway on Gulf to Bay Blvd. would also need to be planted so as to allow calculation of this area as interior landscaping). Recalculate. It is also noted that the landscape area south and east of Retail "B" is indicated as if there is a sidewalk between the doorway on the east side of the building and the sidewalk to the condominiums to the south. Based on Sheet C3.1, there is no sidewalk connector. Need to landscape this area (revise Sheet 1-1.1) and add into interior landscape calculations. Interior green space areas must meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 to qualify as interior green space (one shade tree per 150 sf of required interior green space. Two accent trees (crape myrtle and ligustrum tree) equal one shade tree; three palms equal one shade tree). 07/28/2006 Need to dimension the width of ALL foundation landcape areas on Sheet C3.1. Based on Sheet Met 1-1.1, there is no foundation landscaping provided on the north and west sides of Retail A. Minimum width is five feet. Landscape in accordance with Code requirements on Sheet 1-1.1. 08/03/2006 Sheet L-1 - Can you enlarge the note on Lease Area #1 regarding future landscaping to the same Met size as that shown for Lease Area #2? 08/03/2006 Sheet 1-1.1 - In three interior landscape islands in the middle of the parking area west of Publix Met bald cypress trees are now indicated where Ligustrum Trees and Sable Palmettos were previously indicated. Bald cypress will not work in these islands. Return these islands to Ligustrum Trees and Sable Palmettos. 08/07/2006 Sheet 1-1.1 - Landscape Table: Met a. I only count 19 WE (not 20). Recount/revise. b. I count 56 LT (not 54). Recount/revise. c. I count 1104 MJ (not 1039). Recount/revise. d. I count 535 VA (not 523). Recount/revise. e. I only count 647 IH (not 658). Recount/revise. f. I only count 456 AG (not 464). Recount/revise. 08/07/2006 Sheet L-1 - North of the words "Retail A" there are two boxes that are not tied to any landscape Met Print Date: 05/02/2007 CaseConditons Page 6 of 18 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 area, one that is for 10 MJ and one for 10 MJ. They are not included in any of the plant counts previously commented on. Revise. 08/07/2006 Sheet 1-1.1 - There are some plant materials located on the north side of the southern driveway on Met Belcher Rd on the curved area next to the existing tree that is being removed that is not indicated as to what type of plants and the number of plants (they look like IS). Revise. Legal Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/27/2005 No issues. Met Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 01/03/2006 Show all of the trees with their canopies on all plan sheets prior to D.O. This data is needed to Met determine if additional trees with a #3 rating or above can be preserved by modifing the proposed layout. Additional comment may be forthcoming once this data is reviewed. 01/03/2006 1/3/06-Revise parking lot grades at tree #125 and 129 and any other tree that may be impacted by Met proposed grades. Recommend consulting your arborist to discuss alternative designs to insure tree survivability. Modify prior to D.O. 4/27/06-Further consideration is needed at tree #125, proposed grades are still too severe. Revise prior to building permit. 8/1/06-Tree #125 is not indicated to be removed as stated. This tree has a high rating and is required to be preserved. Consult your arborist to discuss alternative designs to insure tree survivability prior to building permit. 01/03/2006 Additional consideration must be given to the oak trees along the east, south and west property Met lines. Zoning comment #39 may allow for additional green space to accomplish this. Modify plans prior to D.O. 01/03/2006 Consideration must be given to all trees to be preserved if overhead utilities are to be placed Met underground. Modify plans prior to D.O. 01/03/2006 1/3/06-Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, Met landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. 8/1/06- Provide the preservation report that accompanies the preservation plan prior to building permit. 08/18/2006 9/11/06 - WW Met See conditions of approval in the Development Order. 8/18/06 - R A _ Remove the "RIBBON" tree barricade detail prior to building permit. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 07/21/2006 No issues - redevelopment of existing shopping center to a new shopping center - increase of Met floor area only 10%. Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 12/15/2005 Prior to issuance of a building permit the following conditions are to be met: 4/12/06 - Met ACKNOWLEDGED Print Date: 05/02/2007 CaseConditons Page 7 of 18 0 0 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 1)Provide a copy of the approved SW FW MD permit 2)Provide a copy of signed and sealed soils report and double ring infiltrometer percolation test performed at the proposed retention pond bottom. 3)Provide complete drainage calculations including drainage calculations for storm inlet sizing and location on site. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 12/19/2005 8-17-06 - TJG Need specs for compactor behind Retail B. For any compactor units, approval by the Director of Solid Waste is required 8-01-06 Compactors cut sheet shows length of unit 253" this will not fit in enclosure need to address how SW will be handled. 5/15/06 - TJG For any compactor units, approval by the Director of Solid Waste is required. Provide a cut-sheet for approval. For Retail 'A" the double dumpster will be shared by all tenants in Retail "A". The owner of the complex will incur all costs for such dumpsters (he can bill to the tenants). One dumpster is suggested be for cardboard recycling. For Retail "B," suggest two dumpsters (one for garbage and one for cardboard). All dumspters must be within enclosures. 12/19/05 - TJG Please explain solid waste service (double enclosure for retail A 14,000 Sq Ft and only single enclosure for 19,200 Sq Ft) angle for retail A enclosure not correct. please show Publix compactor location. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 Met Met 12/16/2005 Identify the land use for Lease Area 1 and Lease Area 2. 2. Close median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. nearest the Belcher Road and Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. intersection. Thereby creating a longer westbound left turn lane for the major intersection and converting westernmost driveway to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. to be right-in and right-out only. -? 3. Create a westbound left turn lane on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. for eastern median break into the driveway per FDOT standards as indicated in the submitted Traffic Impact Anaysis 12/16/2005. 4. Show turning movement template for a WB-50 truck from the Southern most driveway on Belcher Road and Eastern most driveway on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. into the " loading zone". Truck must be able to go in and out of the loading zone in a forward direction without hitting curbs, buildings, objects, and etc.. 5. The median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. must be designed to accommodate a WB-50 truck both entering and exiting the driveway. 6. Show the angle in degrees for the angular parking, the dimensions must comply to the City's parking lot standards. 7. Provide crosswalk markings along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. and Belcher Road which must comply to current MUTCD standards. ?- R Provide stuns signs and stun bares whera aaaroo4ate DPr c irra_nt CAI I -CD standards. 9. Show desi n fo ' t turn lanes on Belcher Road for project driveways. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. General note: A. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. CaseConditons Print Date: 05/02/2007 Page 8 of 18 0 0 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 B. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. C. Provide necessary improvements to bring affected roadway network to the City's acceptable level of service (LOS) per Traffic Impact Study or as determined by Traffic Operation's Manager or designee. (Development Code Section: 4-802 & 4-803) The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Obtain FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the state road right-of-way. 04/14/2006 Identify the land use for Lease Area 1 and Lease Area 2. Met 4/14/2006 - NOT MET- IF RETAIL AREA 1 & 2 BECOMES A RESTAURANT, THEN APPLICANT MUST REVISE THE SUBMITTED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND MITIGATE ANY IMPACTS FROM THE EXPECTED TRIP VOLUMES GENERATED FROM THE SITE. APPLICANT MUST ACKNOWLEDGE THIS IN A LETTER. 7/31/06 - MET 3. Show turning movement template for a WB-50 truck from the Southern most driveway on Belcher Road and Eastern most driveway on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. into the " loading zone". Truck must be able to go in and out of the loading zone in a forward direction without hitting curbs, buildings, objects, and etc.. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - TRUCK TRACKS APPEAR TO BE HITTING CURBS AND IN SOME AREAS CLOSE OF HITTING STUCTURES NEAR DUMS.TER AND CARDBOARD BOX COMPACTOR AREAS. 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Trucks entering site from Belcher only is unrealistic. Design shall accomodate a truck making a left turn from westbound lanes of Gulf to Bay into site. Path for trucks entering from Belcher shown on Sheet C3.1 indicate that trucks may not be able to clear raised curb at the west exit to Gulf to Bay, the median of Gulf to Bay, the solid waste compactor pad and the dumpster enclosure. 8/18/06 - NOT MET - SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT SHOW THE PATH OF A TRUCK GOING WESTBOUND ON GULF TO BAY ENTERING THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY INTO THE SITE. 9/1/06 - MET 5. The median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. must be designed to accommodate a WB-50 truck both entering and exiting the driveway. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - SHOW TRUCK GOING W-B MAKING A LEFT INTO EASTERN DRIVEWAY. 8/18/06 - NOT MET - SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT SHOW THE PATH OF A TRUCK GOING WESTBOUND ON GULF TO BAY ENTERING THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY INTO THE SITE. 9/1/06 - MET 6. Show the angle in degrees for the angular parking, the dimensions must comply to the City's parking lot standards. 4/14/2006- NOT MET - THE DEPTH FOR 60 DEGREE PARKING STALL MUST BE 20.5' LONG NOT 19' AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. Print Date: 05/02/2007 CaseConditons Page 9 of 18 0 0 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 7/31/06 - MET 7. Provide crosswalk markings along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. and Belcher Road which must comply to current MUTCD standards. 4/14/2006- NOT MET - SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THIS CONDITION. PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN. 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Show crosswalks crossing driveways alnog Belcher Road and Gulf to Bay on Sheet C3.1. 8/18/2006 - MET 8. Provide stops signs and stop bars where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN WITH NOTE. 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Provide stop signs for western driveway along Gulf to Bay, provide stop sign and right turn only sign for northern driveway along Belcher and delete stop sign at signalized driveway on Belcher Road. 8/18/2006 - CROSSWALK MARKINGS SHALL TERMINATE AT THE RAMPS. DELETE THE WORD STOP ON THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT THE SOUTH, SIGNALIZED DRIVEAWY TO BELCHER ROAD. 9/1/06 - MET All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. General note: A. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. B. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. C. Provide necessary improvements to bring affected roadway network to the City's acceptable level of service (LOS) per Traffic Impact Study or as determined by Traffic Operation's Manager or designee. (Development Code Section: 4-802 & 4-803) The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Obtain FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the state road right-of-way. 2. Obtain Pinellas County permit for work in County R-O-W. 3. Close median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. nearest the Belcher Road and Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. intersection. Thereby creating a longer westbound left turn lane for the major intersection and converting westernmost driveway to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. to be right-in and right-out only. 4/14/2006- NOT MET - CURRENTLY FDOT (DAN KARAS 727-570-5101 EXT. 35007) HAS SUPPORTED THIS CONDITION. NEED A LETTER FROM FDOT TO INDICATE NOT NECESSARY.B_E 7/31/06 - NOT MET 4. Show design for right turn lanes on Belcher Road for project driveways. CaseConditons Print Date: 05/02/2007 Page 10 of 18 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD • Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE PINELLAS COUNTY TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT INDICATING RIGHT TURN LANES IS NOT NECESSARY SINCE BELCHER ROAD IS MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY. B _E 7/31/06 - NOT MET 8/11/2006 - No decelerations lanes will be needed for driveways along Belcher Road, however, it is agreed in a meeting with Traffic Ops. and Doreen Williams from Northside Engineering that a larger ingress and egress driveway radius (50 foot radius) is needed instead of the decelearation lanes. 8/18/06 - MET Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/27/2005 9/1/06 - WW Met See conditions of approval in the Development Order. 8/24/06, 7/28/06, 5/12/06 & 12/27/05 - WW Condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the vacation of the 10-foot wide utility easement be approved by City Council; 12/27/2005 1/5/06 - WW Met Agreed to drop this condition at the DRC meeting. 12/27/05 - WW Need to record, unless one already exists, a pedestrian access easement with the condominiums to the south and the mobile home park to the east (prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy). 12/27/2005 5/11/06 - WW Met Revise the terminal island at the southeast corner of Retail A to have the striped walkway as part of the pavement and otherwise curb the landscape island (ie: remove the walkway from the island by reducing the width of the island). 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting it was agreed to leave the loading area as shown on the plan, but to provide a striped access walkway north of the loading area and adjacent to the parking spaces to allow access to the sidewalk to the individual tenant spaces. 12/27/05 - WW The loading area behind the grocery store is dedicated for that store. Relocate the single loading space behind Retail A to be adjacent to the building to provide a loading space for those stores. 12/27/2005 Reposition double dumpster behind grocery store to allow truck to pick up with the truck coming Met from the east. 12/2712005 5/11/06 - WW Met Response letter indicates that the freestanding signs now meet the required five-foot setback, however, freestanding signs shown on Sheets C2.1, C3.1, C4.1, C5.1 and L1.1 do not meet the required setback. Revise. 12/27/05 - WW Freestanding and attached signage is not approved with this application. A Comprehensive Sign Program will be necessary to be submitted for approval (based on two freestanding signs on Gulf to Bay Boulevard Belcher Road and assumed desired for Lease Areas #1 and #2). Signs will need to meet the required five-foot setback. All freestanding signs must be coordinated with the color and materials of the shopping center and/or buildings on the lease areas. 12/27/2005 7/31/06 & 5/11/05 - WW Met Not shown on elevations (no details, just "tenant" or "signage"). 12/27/05 - WW Show on the building elevations the locations of attached building signage (indicate as "signage" CaseConditons Print Date: 05/02/2007 Page 11 of 18 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD • Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 or "tenant'). 12/27/2005 9/1/06 - WW Met See conditions of approval in the Development Order. 8/24/06, 7/31/06, 5/12/06 & 5/27/05 - WW Condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records, with a copy of the recorded document submitted to the Planning Department. 12/27/2005 9/1/06 - WW Met See conditions of approval in the Development Order. 8/24/06 & 7/31/06 - WW Include as a condition of approval. 6/8/06 - WW After a meeting this morning with Housh Ghovaee and representatives of the developer, and after a subsequent site inspection, Michael Delk and I have determined that the four new power poles along the south property line (north of the mobile home park) can stay. There are existing utility lines along the east property line adjacent to the motel that may remain. All other utility poles are to be removed, either in Phase 1 or in Phase 2 of construction. As indicated by the developers, power for the shopping center will be brought from the new power poles underground to transformers to feed Retail A, Retail B and Publix. The existing utility line (which appears to be for cable or phone) along the north property line along Gulf to Bay Blvd. will be removed. It will be determined whether the utility pole on Gulf to Bay Blvd. at the northeast corner of the existing shopping center can or should be removed (hopefully removed). All utilities on-site will be underground. 5/12/06 - WW Site inspection along the south side of the property off Belcher Road (south of Publix) does not indicate any above ground utilities. Unclear what overhead utilities being referred to that need to be retained due to tree preservation (?). Advise. Code requires all on-site utilities to be placed underground. Based on a site inspection on 5/14/06, NEW overhead utilities have been installed on-site along the south side of the property adjacent to the existing mobile home park and on-site on the east side of Publix at its northeast corner. These overhead lines must be placed underground on-site (see discussion under 1/12/06) within the 10-foot wide proposed utility easement. Along the east side of Lease Area #2, there is only one tree that will be affected, which is adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd in the northeast corner of the property. Conduits can be directionally bored at this location to resolve the tree conflict. Based on a site inspection, there are also some overhead lines along Gulf to Bay Blvd east of the existing main shopping center driveway that appears to only serve the subject property. Likewise there were overhead lines that ran north to south behind the existing shopping center that also appears to serve the subject property only. It appears that these existing overhead lines can be removed. The removal of these overhead lines in both locations will be beneficial visually, as well as beneficial to the existing trees that the lines run through. Staff will not support above ground on-site utilities. Revise/advise. 1/12/06 - WW At the 1/5/06 DRC meeting, the applicant advised there were above ground utilities along the south property line off Belcher Road that they want to retain. Additionally, there are existing above ground utilities serving the mobile home park coming off Gulf to Bay Boulevard that they want to relocate as above ground utilities to the east and south side of the property (adjacent to the motel and the north side of the mobile home park in the proposed 10-foot wide utility easement). After discussion with Neil Thompson, undergrounding these utilities appear practicable and should be required with the redevelopment of the property. 12/27/05 - WW All on-site utilities must be underground. Print Date: 05/02/2007 CaseConditons Page 12 of 18 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD 0 Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/27/2005 9/l/06 - WW Met See conditions of approval in the Development Order. 8/24/06, 7/31/06, 5/12/06 & 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting, it was agreed to make this a condition of approval in the Development Order that this be done prior to the issuance of any permits. 12/27/05 - WW Show the locations of parking lot lighting on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 and freestanding signage on Sheet L1.1. Coordinate such lighting locations, as well as freestanding signs, with proposed landscaping to ensure the proposed lights and signs will not be shielded by existing or future tree canopies and other landscape materials. 12/27/2005 9/1/06 - WW Met See conditions of approval in the Development Order. 8/24/06, 7/31/06, 5/12/06 & 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting, it was agreed that a condition of approval in the Development Order is that these lease areas must meet Code - see comment below. 12/27/05 - WW To ensure that Lease Areas #1 and #2 can be developed with permitted uses (most likely retail or restaurants), show at least a conceptual design for each Lease Area to indicate adequate parking, landscaping, loading, traffic circulation and dumpster access will work. 12/27/2005 1/12/06 - WW Met At the 1/5/06 DRC meeting, we were advised this easement is for relocated overhead utility lines (see prior Planning DRC comment regarding the need to underground existing overhead utilities). 12/27/05 - WW Unclear why the 10-foot wide easement is proposed along the east side of Lease Area #2. Advise. 12/27/2005 7/31/06 - WW Met Billboard was removed first part of June 2006. 5/12/06 & 1/16/06 - WW On 1/13/06 the Settlement Agreement was submitted wherein the billboard must be removed by June 1, 2006. Include as a condition of approval. 12/27/05 - WW Condition of approval: That no building permit be issued until the billboard is removed or compliance is achieved with all applicable sign ordinances. 12/27/2005 Sheet C2.1 - Unclear the need for the pedestrian crosswalk at the southwest corner of Retail B, Met since it does not appear to connect with any sidewalk to the south of this property. Advise/remove. 12/27/2005 Sheet C2.1 - Dimension the width of the 90-degree parking spaces west of Retail B and southern Met portion of grocery store and the parking row along Belcher Road (appear to be nine-foot wide spaces). 12/27/2005 Coordinate/show on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 the column locations, covered walkways and Met overhangs indicated on the building site/floor plans (Sheets A1.1, A2.1, A2.2), as to sidewalks and foundation landscape areas. 12/27/2005 7/31/06 - WW Met Recorded easement submitted. 5/12/06 - WW Since the site is being designed to provide continued access to the mobile home park to Gulf to Bay Blvd, need to record an access easement prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 12/27/05 - WW Unless already recorded (and, if so, provide a copy of the recorded document), need to record a CaseConditons Print Date: 05/02/2007 Page 13 of 18 0 0 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 cross-access easement with the eye clinic to the south and the mobile home park to the south prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (condition of approval). 12/27/2005 By Code provisions, only nine handicap parking spaces are required. Suggest reducing to the Met minimum required. Also, suggest relocating one of the nine required handicap spaces to the west of Retail B to provide more direct and closer handicap access to this retail space. 12/27/2005 8/30/06 - WW Met Based on a large amount of floor area being used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes, the parking reduction is acceptable. 8/24/06 - WW The Flexibility criteria for a parking reduction states that "the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes." The proposal indicates a 34 parking space deficit from the five spaces per 1,000 square feet requirement. This equates to 6,800 square feet of GFA. Between Publix and Retail B primarily, demonstrate that there is 6,800 square feet of floor area that would be "used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes." 8/7/06 - WW Continuing to discuss parking reduction with Engineering. Will get back to you. 5/12/06 - WW Unclear of request. Response letter dated Jan. 11, 2006, but submitted April 11, 2006, states that "we wish to leave five spaces per 1,000 SF." Revised Exhibit "A" includes a parking reduction from five to four spaces per 1,000 square feet, however, no parking reduction study has been submitted. There is a discussion regarding parking in the response to Criteria #1 of the General Applicability criteria. Parking calculations on Sheet C1.1 indicates 438 spaces are required, however, only 405 spaces are being provided (which therefore appears to indicate a need for a parking reduction). Please clarify the request, the numbers and all application materials. If a parking reduction is really being requested, a parking reduction study must be submitted justifying the reduction. 12/27/06 - WW According to Urban Land Institute (ULI) standards and the range of required parking for retail sales, Staff would support a reduction of parking below five spaces per 1,000 sf to as low as four spaces per 1,000 sf (will need some type of a Parking Study justifying the reduction at least on the type of shopping center and types of use). This type of a neighborhood shopping center does not generate the need for five spaces per 1,000 sf (as a mall would) and a lower number of parking spaces would make greater use of, and promote a greater turnover of cars in, the provided parking. This also reduces the amount of impervious surface. Obviously, the location of spaces needs to reflect where needs are, but some of the outlying parking west of the grocery store may be able to be reduced/eliminated. 12/27/2005 Sheet C1.1 - The aerial map is too dark to even see the site. Lighten up. Met 12/27/2005 Sheet C2.1 - Dimension the width of the main driveway/drive aisle on the east side of the property Met (west of Lease Area #2) and as it enters the mobile home park to the south. 12/27/2005 Unclear how Lease Area #1 is being serviced with water and sewer. Revise Sheet C3.1. Met 12/27/2005 5/14/06 - WW Met Three cart corrals have been shown. Recommend moving the corrals to one side of the islands to allow more cohesive landscaped area for plantings, as the small areas will not function well. 12/27/05 - WW Parking lot design does not provide for shopping cart return corrals. Revise Sheet C2.1 to show the corrals. 12/27/2005 5/15/06 - WW Met Withholding comment until elevations of Retail "B" are submitted. Print Date: 05/02/2007 CaseConditons Page 14 of 18 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/27/05 - WW Code permits a maximum parapet of 30 inches from the highest roof deck elevation. The Planning Department has advertised a requested increase for the parapet for the grocery store of 10.17 feet (or 34.17 feet) above the roof deck at (24.0 feet). The parapet for Retail B is shown 12.5 feet above the highest roof deck (assumed to be 26 feet, since it is not indicated on "3 - Rear Elevation"; which is in conflict with the 24.0 feet indicated on "2 - Front Elevation"). Additionally, the parapet in the middle of Retail A is shown at 9.67 feet above the highest roof deck (assumed to be 20.0 feet, since it is not indicated on "4 - Rear Elevation"; which is in conflict with the 18.0 feet indicated on "2 - Front Elevation"). In all three instances, the parapet height is excessive and Staff will not support such a parapet height. No justification has been submitted for such parapet height. It appears that the proposed height is only to accommodate increased attached signage. Reduce the parapet height to something more reasonable, potentially in the five-to-six foot height (which is double or more than double the minimum). In concert with the reduction to the parapet height, the height of the hip-roofed structures should also be reduced proportionally. 12/27/2005 Elevations - In "3 - Rear Elevation" there is a higher portion of the building in the center of the Met grocery store (greater than 34.17 feet) that is not reflected on "1 - Front Elevation". Revise. 12/27/2005 Elevations - "1 - Front Elevation" - It would seem that the center hip-roofed covered walkway for Met the grocery store would have greater importance than the two hip-roofed structures on the ends of the grocery store. Revise/advise. 12/27/2005 9/1/06 - WW Met See conditions of approval in the Development Order. 8/24/06, 7/31/06 & 5/14/06 - WW Include as a condition of approval. 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting it was agreed that screening of the mechanical equipment be shown on plans prior to the issuance of building permits. 12/27/05 - WW Based on the elevations submitted, it appears the proposal has adequately screened from view the rooftop mechanical equipment. However, Section 3-201.D requires the screening of mechanical equipment on all sides, including abutting properties. Need to address the rear of the shopping center. 12/27/2005 Unclear what material the "awnings" are made of in the center of Retail A (Suites 105-107) and on Met the front of Suite 111. Indicate on plans. 01/03/2006 5/15/06 - WW Met Combined with another comment regarding overhead utilities. 1/3/06 - WW Code requires all on-site utilities be located underground. Based on a site inspection, there are some overhead lines along Gulf to Bay Blvd east of the existing main shopping center driveway that appears to only serve the subject property. Likewise there are overhead lines that run north to south behind the existing shopping center that also appears to serve the subject property only. It appears that these existing overhead lines can be removed. The removal of these overhead lines in both locations will be beneficial visually, as well as beneficial to the existing trees that the lines run through. Revise/advise. 05/12/2006 Sheet C3.1 - Vinyl fence along the east property line adjecent to the motel must be reduced to a Met maximum of three feet in height in the front setback (first 25 feet). Additionally, the fence on both sides of the driveway to the mobile home park must be reduced to a maximum of three feet in height within a visibility triangle formed by the east/west mobile home drive and the drive access through this property. Print Date: 05/02/2007 CaseConditons Page 15 of 18 0 0 FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 05/12/2006 7/31/06 - WW Met Relocate the sidewalk ramp in front of the southern portion of Retail "B" to line up with the crosswalk from the handicap parking space. 5/12/06 - WW Eliminate the sidewalk between the handicap parking space and the single, angled space to the west of Retail "B" to increase interior landscape area and allow this area to qualify as interior landscaping. Relocate the crosswalk slightly northward to line up with the walk aisle for the handicap parking space (little piece of sidewalk, crosswalk and ramp). 05/12/2006 Sheet C3.1 - Two parking areas indicated as having 21 spaces in the double rows of angled Met parking west of Publix only have 20 spaces. Revise. 05/12/2006 7/31/06 & 5/12/06 - WW Met Sheet C3.1 - Dimension the width of the driveway/drive aisle on the east side of the property (west of Lease Area #2) as it enters the mobile home park (it is less than 30 feet). 05/15/2006 Compactor location for Publix shown on Sheets A2.1, A2.3 and A4.1 doesn't match that indicated Met on Sheets C2.1, C3.1, C4.1, C5.1 and 1-1.1. Which is correct? Revise all appropriate sheets. Ensure adequate drive aisle width is provided for delivery trucks, trash trucks and fire trucks. 05/15/2006 Sheet A4.1 - Need to provide the west and east elevations for Retail "B". Met 05/15/2006 Sheet A4.1 - North elevation for Retail "A" - Provide the height of the hip roof structure to the top Met of the structure. 05/15/2006 Sheet A4.2 - Met a. North elevation - Provide the height of the eastern and western "towers." b. West elevation - The eastern "tower" should be seen as "ghosted in." c. West elevation - Provide the height of the western "tower." d. East elevation - The eastern "tower," as well as the western "tower," should be seen in this elevation (should also see much of Retail "A" as it is angled). e. South elevation - A 24'-8" dimension to metal truss brg. is indicated on the right side, but it is unclear what this is indicating and is higher than 24'-8". 05/15/2006 There is an exit door on the rear of Retail "B" at the southeast corner shown on Sheet A2.3 and is Met also indicated on the civil plans. It is assumed that this door will provide access to the dumpster for Retail "B," due to its location. There is no stoop or sidewalk indicated on the civil plans to provide this access from the door to the dumpster. Indicate the stoop and sidewalk between the building and the dumpster on all civil and landscape plans. 05/15/2006 9/1/06 - WW Met See conditions of approval in the Development Order. 8/24/06, 7/31/06 & 5/15/06 - WW Potential condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of building permits, dumpster enclosures be constructed of the same materials, and painted the same, as the building. 05/15/2006 7/31/06 - WW Met Sheet C3.1 and L1.1 - Wheel stops are required adjacent for parking spaces adjacent to landscaped areas (single space west of Retail "B," along east side of Lease Area #1 and spaces that have the vehicles front to landscape islands). 5/15/06 - WW Sheet C3.1 and L1.1 - Wheel stops are required adjacent for parking spaces adjacent to landscaped areas (single space west of Retail "B," spaces south of Retail "A," spaces adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd [all rows], spaces adjacent to Belcher Road and along east side of Lease Area #1 and spaces that have the vehicles front to landscape islands). 05/15/2006 Note: Parking stall length may be reduced to 18 feet. Met Print Date: 05/02/2007 CaseConditons Page 16 of 18 • FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD • Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 05/15/2006 Sheet C5.1 - Plans are confusing regarding sanitary sewer service to Lease Area #1: Met a. A sanitary sewer line has been shown paralleling Belcher Road from a manhole on Gulf to Bay Blvd. to a new lift station near Belcher Road; but b. A sanitary sewer line has been shown along the south side of Retail "B" connecting Lease Area #1 to an existing sanitary line at the rear of Retail "B" with a note of "cap 3" F.M. for future connnection to future lift station". It looks like two connections are proposed. Which is the correct one? 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the vacation of the 10-foot wide utility easement be approved by City Council; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records, with a copy of the recorded document submitted to the Planning Department; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That Lease Areas #1 and #2 meet all Code requirements, including, but not limited to, FAR, ISR, parking, loading, traffic circulation, landscaping, dumpster access, etc.; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That a Comprehensive Sign Program be approved for the entire shopping center, including Lease Areas #1 and #2; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That all on-site utilities be underground, with the exception of the overhead lines along the south property line to the south of Retail A; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the location of parking lot lighting meet Code and be coordinated with site landscaping to avoid shielding of lighting by existing or future tree canopy; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of building permits, screening of mechanical equipment be shown on plans; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of building permits, dumpster enclosures be constructed of the same materials, and painted the same, as the building; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, plans be revised to remove the "RIBBON" tree barricade detail; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant obtain a FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the State right-of-way and a Pinellas County permit for work in County right-of-way; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a letter from FDOT be submitted indicating closing of the median opening on Gulf to Bay Boulevard nearest Belcher Road north of this property is not necessary; 09/01/2006 Condition of approval included in the Development Order: Not Met That any future compactor dumpster units be approved by the Director of Solid Waste prior to Print Date: 05/02/2007 CaseConditons Page 17 of 18 1r 1? FLS2005-12098 501 S BELCHER RD ZONING CONDITION - D.O. Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 their installation. CaseConditons Print Date: 05/02/2007 Page 18 of 18 Li It OEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA ORDINANCE NO. 7615-06 INST# 2006214681 06/08/2006 at 08:58 AM OFF REC BK: 15169 PG: 1967-1968 DocType:GOV RECORDING: $18.50 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, VACATING THE NORTH 268.65 FEET OF THE 10-FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LYING ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF METES AND BOUNDS 32-05, LOCATED IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Ellis & Co., LTD, owner of real property located in the City of Clearwater, has requested that the City vacate the drainage and utility easement depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that said easement is not necessary for municipal use and it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City and the general public that the same be vacated; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following: The North 268.65 feet of the 10-foot drainage and utility easement lying along the East property line of Metes and Bounds Parcel number 32-05, located in Section 19, Township 29 south, Range 16 East, subject to the following condition: This vacation shall not be effective until the applicant has submitted to the City Engineer proof that all existing utilities lying within the easement portion to be vacated have been relocated to the satisfaction of the owners of said utilities and at the sole expense of said applicant. If this condition has not been met within six (6) months of the date of approval of this ordinance, this ordinance will thereafter be null and void in all respects as though never adopted. Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING Mails, 2006 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED June 1, 2006 RETURN TO: CITY CLERK 112 S. OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER, FL 33756 Frank V. Hibbard 1 hereby certify that this is a true and Mayor correct copy or the oribinal as it appears to the files of the City of Clearwater. Witness my hand and official seal of Approved as to form: st: the a oraCleea d Deputy CityCler- Bryan D. Ruff ' is E. Goudeau Assistant City Attorney lerk Ordinance No. 7615-06 i t 1 la ; 23/02 G ? 870 576i ? 577 579 idd 608 SHELLEY ST 22/07 i soa 607 i 23/14 23/15 ti 2410 co 23/18 23/19 13 RIA, GUI 33 30 32/04 Vacation Requested syApplicant ' 10 Drainage & Utility Easement 32/05 Q W V J W y F--TO-BAY BLVD 32/03 32/02 32/01 32/121 LL. N 0 .. w e City of Clearwater Public Works Administration / Engineering Zell. j= Vacate the North 268.65 feet of the 10-foot drainage and . :::...^, • utility easement lying along the east property line M&B . 32-05. Ordinance 7615-06 Drawn By: S.K. Reviewed By: S.D. Scale: 1" = 200 ft DWG. No VAC 2006-05 Grid # 299A S - T - R 18-29s-16e Date: 02/14/06 • E Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:26 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Publix Center I was told they were resubmitting the plans with the landscape at the end of the building moved away from the building. I am done with making changes to this plan. Per my direction to Mr. Leeds last week, the only relief granted by me was the 2.5 ft. wide portion parallel to GtoB. mld Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 727-562-4561 myclearwater.com a • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 6:03 PM To: 'Mettler, Christopher M' Cc: Clayton, Gina; Porter, Catherine Subject: RE: supplemental recommendations: Case #CW 04-9 [LUZ2003-09009] (Existing Use: vacant mobile home park - Proposed Use: non-residential) - 1.3 acres located south side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, Chris - Just got your request at 4:18 pm today and am trying to hustle a response to you. The shopping center basically at the southeast corner of Belcher Road and Gulf to Bay Boulevard (GTB) is being redeveloped and expanded. Building permits have been issued for portions of the redeveloped shopping center. The redeveloped site includes the shopping center, the property at 2201 Gulf to Bay Boulevard (southeast corner of Belcher and GTB), the former restaurant at 2257 GTB and a portion of the mobile home park at 2275 GTB (which was the subject of a land use and rezoning under Case #CW 04-9 [LUZ2003-09009]). The redeveloped shopping center will move Publix (54,000+ square feet) up to the corner of an "L" shaped shopping center, with a tenant space to the south of Publix (Retail B - 19,000+ square feet) and smaller retail shops facing GTB (Retail A - almost 14,000 square feet). There are also two lease areas, yet to be designed, that are part of the shopping center and will take internal access from the shopping center drives (no new or additional driveways to either Belcher Road or to GTB for Lease Area #1 [on Belcher Road] and Lease Area #2 [on GTB]). The shopping center will have two driveways on Belcher Road (same southern location at the existing traffic light and one midpoint between this southern driveway and GTB) and two driveways on GTB (western driveway where main existing shopping center driveway existed and an eastern driveway which lines up with access to the mobile home park to the south of the shopping center (Retail A). All other existing driveways will be removed and upright curbing installed. The existing median opening on GTB at the western driveway will be closed, allowing the westbound GTB left turn stacking lane to be extended and turning movements will be right in/right out on GTB. The eastern driveway on GTB will allow right and left turns onto GTB. As to cross access to the property to the east, there is an existing motel that prevents cross access being implemented. As to cross access to the west, as stated above, the parcel at the southeast corner of Belcher Road and GTB has been enveloped into the shopping center and now will be part of the retention pond for the shopping center (existing driveways being removed). I have an 8.5" x 11" site plan for the shopping center (fairly accurate to that approved) that I could fax to you if it would help. Let me know. If you have any additional questions, feel free to call me (562-4504) or email me. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Mettler, Christopher M [mailto:cmettler@co.pinellas.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 4:18 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: supplemental recommendations: Case #CW 04-9 [LUZ2003-09009](Existing use: vacant mobile home park - Proposed Use: non-residential) - 1.3 acres located south side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, Hi Wayne - I am preparing a report on supplemental recommendations to be presented at the January PPC. Please indicate the status of this 2004 case: * Case #CW 04-9 [LUZ2003-09009](Existing Use: vacant mobile home 1 park - Proposed Use: non-residential) - 1.3 acres located so* side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, approximately 850 feet east of Belcher Road, amended from Residential Low Medium to Commercial General. Supplemental Recommendation: That the City require cross-access between the subject site and adjacent commercial general uses to ameliorate traffic impacts. In last year's report, we indicated: "To date, a proposed site plan (under review by City staff) shows that cross-access to the property to the west will be achieved. However, the parcel to the east is developed with a motel and precludes the proposed cross-access to the site at this time." Do you have anything to add? Was the site plan approved with cross-access to the east and west? The development order Catherine Porter sent me does not appear to address the access issue. Please email me back by the end of the week. Thank you! Chris Mettler -----Original Message----- From: Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com [mailto:Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 9:00 AM To: Catherine.Porter@myClearwater.com; Mettler, Christopher M Subject: RE: supplemental recommendations: Case #CW 04-9 [LUZ2003-09009](Existing Use: vacant mobile home park - Proposed Use: non-residential) - 1.3 acres located south side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, Wayne - does the redevelopment of the mobile home park include the existing Publix? If so - I think that the PPC recommendation that there be cross-access between the two properties was met. If so - since can you please let Chris know this. Thanks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Porter, Catherine > Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 12:13 PM > To: 'cmettler@co.pinellas.fl.us' > Cc: Clayton, Gina > Subject: supplemental recommendations: Case #CW 04-9 [LUZ2003-09009](Existing Use: vacant mobile home park - Proposed Use: non-residential) - 1.3 acres located south side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, > This case is also known as 501 S. Belcher, FLS2005-12098. Please see attached Development Order. If you have further questions please contact Wayne Wells, Planner III: wayne.wells@myclearwater.com OR 562-4504. > << File: Belcher 501-525 FLS2005-12098 Development Order.doc >> > Catherine W. Porter, AICP > Long Range Planning Manager > City of Clearwater Planning Department > 100 S. Myrtle Avenue - P.O. Box 4748 > Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 > 727-562-4626 - FAX 727-562-4865 > catherine.porter@myclearwater.com 2 Florida Department of Transportation Pinellas Maintenance JEB BUSH 5211 Ulmerton Road GOVERNOR Clearwater, Florida 33760 (727) 570-5101 October 16, 2006 Mrs. Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Permit No: 2006-A-799-22, Section 15040, SR 60 Project: Gulf to Bay Plaza (NIP review response) Dear Mrs. Williams: DENVER J. STUTLER, JR., P.E. SECRETARY The Department has received your response dated October 12, 2006 to the Notice of Intent to Permit (N.I.P.). The following items have not been addressed to satisfy the N.I.P. Item 4. We requested the Driveway materials shall be comprised of a minimum 6" thick 3,000 PSI class I non-structural concrete. The response provided refers to Paving Note # 4 on sheet C 1.2. The referenced sheet was not provided. Item 10 The Department requested that you provide on the plans the maintenance of traffic plans that will be utilized while working within the state right of way. The response refers us to see the MOT plan using FDOT Index 600 & 616. Our office was unable to locate the referenced MOT plan within your submittal, in addition the plan should also include F.D.O.T. Standard index # 660 for pedestrian safety. Item 19. We requested that cross sections be provided every 50' along all proposed median modifications and closures. The requested cross sections were not provided. www.dot.state.fl.us ,4 e • • Mrs. Doreen A. Williams October 16, 2006 Page 2 Please make these corrections and submit four sets of revised plans to our office. Mr. Chris Gregory is available to answer any questions at (727) 570-5101. Sincerely, Brian A. Bennett, P.E. Pinellas Maintenance Engineer BB/CG cc: D. Olson, N. Lataille, City of Clearwater Development Review, File ` I#: 2006360774 BK: 15 PG: 1635, 09/29/2006 at 10:28 AM, R RDING 2 PAGES $18.50 KEN BURKE, OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY D1W CLERK: CLKDM86 _ PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE: 727-562-4567; FAX: 727-562-4865 DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE proper Owner: Ellis & Co,..., LLLP property Address: SE Corner of Gulf to Bay and Belcher Rd, (Gulf to ay Shopping enter, earwa er, Florida) KNOW OF ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, being the fee owner (s) of the following described real property (legal description) situated in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas and State of Florida, to wit: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO & MADE PART HEREOF; do hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions on said lands, hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall o .4 hereafter be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an indivisible building site. 2. That the said property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land, and that no portion thereof shall be sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately except in its entirety, as one q plot or parcel of land. •d s di 3. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as provided by st law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, i3 (I and all parties claiming under them until such time as the same may be released in writing under the order B of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this o[o? day of )&2 41-& 9A2 _ 2006 at Clearwater, Florida OWNER (S): ELLIS & CO., LLLP By: Elbanco, LLC, General Partner COUNTY OF PINELLAS `ykiri Barbara A Brown _ MYCOMMISSUN! DD22996t Septnmber29, 2t)07 r g;?,• ` 50NXDtMTR0rFA1N1Nsi Barbara A Brawn tA?( mt DD229464 E7(PIR' ??ber 29, 2001 sa+D®nnoteorFiw nsUPAMM n+c By : e - T fore omg instrument was acknowled ed before me this o7o) n day of < ?e1i , 20 C6 by ja; ?. i'?Q.?? ?1 (l.?l[t.?G/ on beh f whom the instrumewf as executed. Notary Public Signature ??F- a• ?YU.a'1 Name of Notary Printed Notary Commission Number. bmaig(o 4 Personally known V_ or produced identification Type of identification produced F? PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFWC: BK 15392 PG 1636 • EXHIBIT AI .PARCEL Nat . TINT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OIW. V4/ OF THE SOUTHWEST GARTER IS.W. V43'OF SECTION 18. TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTKA44GE 16 EAST. PNELLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA BEND MORE PARTICULARLY DESr A 0 AS FOLLOWS PARCEL No. V RANGE 16 EAST. 796.00 FEETo GULF TO BAY CONTAINING 10.5696 ACRES MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT A ?`No1 ji'ttII;IItojo? /llrllrl N 1111PARCEL a' ? r?'GL1lQ? F *'•• 'ii t ` ..\\ S7 4T FF RIDA PIN AS CO" UDR ??1H lrybk:r.?tvylh.t4a? igrecaI?g is a trUe'r S* : r crL?;i . ,ca?ars amolig the files r ilR E 20 rr?*s?o1i11N? - B Circuit Cou ? r .? Na 31 GIM %D0 MM TTIE ICE SOI 80CORNER 44rW EXIST ALONG THE SOUARTER SEC a LUNEH6?S OO FEM THENCE SOUTH 00.50 20 WES TT 50 00 FEET RANGE 16 CAST. POINT OF C6 *rA T" CONTINUE SOUTH 00.05.20' WEST. 160.00 FEET1 THENCE SOUTH 89.4T18^ EAST. 145.00 FEETI ENCE WORTH 00.05120" EAST.-VO.00 FEETi THENCE NORTH 89' 4n WEST. KONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF GILF•TO.8AY BOULEVARD. I45_00 FEET TO THE POINT OF' OEGNNNC. PARCEL W N 1 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 2:40 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501 S Belcher Wayne, Ben and I reviewed the revisions submitted. All conditions have been met. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 6:23 PM To: Rice, Scott; Keller, James; Glenn, Tom Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd, Gulf to Bay Plaza Scott, Jim and Tom - Revised plans were resubmitted for the above referenced project today. These revised plans have been placed on top of the file cabinets across from our conference room (Rm 216). There are seven sets of revised Sheets C3.1 and 1-1.1, as well as Parking Demand Studies and response to comments sheets. (There are still the two sets of plans with updates dated 8/16/06.) You may take a set if you desire. Please review as soon as you can (realizing Thursday is DRC, but if possible by noon on Friday as they would really like to get a Development Order this week) and let me know if all of your comments are "met" or "not met" (needing to be further revised prior to the issuance of a Development Order). If any of your comments are still "not met" but are necessary to be included as a condition of approval in the Development Order, let me know. Thanks. Wayne 9 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 10:27 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501 S Belcher Wayne, There are three outstanding concerns with the subject application: 3. Show turning movement template for a WB-50 truck from the Southern most driveway on Belcher Road and Eastern most driveway on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. into the " loading zone". Truck must be able to go in and out of the loading zone in a forward direction without hitting curbs, buildings, objects, and etc.. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - TRUCK TRACKS APPEAR TO BE HITTING CURBS AND IN SOME AREAS CLOSE OF HITTING STUCTURES NEAR DUMSTER AND CARDBOARD BOX COMPACTOR AREAS. 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Trucks entering site from Belcher only is unrealistic. Design shall accommodate a truck making a left turn from westbound lanes of Gulf to Bay into site. Path for trucks entering from Belcher shown on Sheet C3.1 indicate that trucks may not be able to clear raised curb at the west exit to Gulf to Bay, the median of Gulf to Bay, the solid waste compactor pad and the dumpster enclosure. 8/18/06 - NOT MET - SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT SHOW THE PATH OF A TRUCK GOING WESTBOUND ON GULF TO BAY ENTERING THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY INTO THE SITE. 5. The median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. must be designed to accommodate a WB-50 truck both entering and exiting the driveway. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - SHOW TRUCK GOING W-B MAKING A LEFT INTO EASTERN DRIVEWAY. 8/18/06 - NOT MET - SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT SHOW THE PATH OF A TRUCK GOING WESTBOUND ON GULF TO BAY ENTERING THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY INTO THE SITE. 8. Provide stops signs and stop bars where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. 4/14/2006 - NOT MET - PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN WITH NOTE. . 7/31/06 - NOT MET - Provide stop signs for western driveway along Gulf to Bay, provide stop sign and right turn only sign for northern driveway along Belcher and delete stop sign at signalized driveway on Belcher Road. 8/18/2006 - CROSSWALK MARKINGS SHALL TERMINATE AT THE RAMPS. DELETE THE WORD "STOP" ON THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT THE SOUTH, SIGNALIZED DRIVEWAY TO BELCHER ROAD. .. : S? s.d` Comment revisions are BOLD. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com • • Wells, Wayne From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 10:53 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd, Gulf to Bay Plaza Thanks, Wayne, I had heard that it was coming down but had not verified that. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 10:46 AM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd, Gulf to Bay Plaza Leslie - The billboard was removed 2-3 months ago. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 9:41 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd, Gulf to Bay Plaza Wayne, please advise whether the billboard structure appears in the plans and what its disposition is shown to be. Will this submission replace/supersede the previously approved project? If so, the same condition re billboard compliance needs to be used. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 9:14 AM To: Albee, Rick; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Doherty, Steve; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd, Gulf to Bay Plaza DRC Members - Plans were resubmitted for the above referenced project yesterday. Plans have been placed on top of the file cabinets across from our conference room (Rm 216). There are two sets of plans with updates dated 8/16/06. You may take a set if you desire (Scott and Rick - you already have a set of the updated plans). Please review as soon as you can (no later than Monday afternoon) and let me know if all of your comments are "met" or "not met" (needing to be further revised prior to the issuance of a Development Order). If any of your comments are still "not met" but are necessary to be included as a condition of approval in the Development Order, let me know. Thanks. Wayne • n Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 2:34 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd, Gulf to Bay Plaza Updated conditions. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 9:14 AM To: Albee, Rick; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Doherty, Steve; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd, Gulf to Bay Plaza DRC Members - Plans were resubmitted for the above referenced project yesterday. Plans have been placed on top of the file cabinets across from our conference room (Rm 216). There are two sets of plans with updates dated 8/16/06. You may take a set if you desire (Scott and Rick - you already have a set of the updated plans). Please review as soon as you can (no later than Monday afternoon) and let me know if all of your comments are "met" or "not met" (needing to be further revised prior to the issuance of a Development Order). If any of your comments are still "not met" but are necessary to be included as a condition of approval in the Development Order, let me know. Thanks. Wayne 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:37 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd, Gulf to Bay Plaza Wayne, P&R had no issues with this project. I have reviewed the resubmitted plans and we still have no issues. Thanks!! Debbie O -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 9:14 AM To: Albee, Rick; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Doherty, Steve; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd, Gulf to Bay Plaza DRC Members - Plans were resubmitted for the above referenced project yesterday. Plans have been placed on top of the file cabinets across from our conference room (Rm 216). There are two sets of plans with updates dated 8/16/06. You may take a set if you desire (Scott and Rick - you already have a set of the updated plans). Please review as soon as you can (no later than Monday afternoon) and let me know if all of your comments are "met" or "not met" (needing to be further revised prior to the issuance of a Development Order). If any of your comments are still "not met" but are necessary to be included as a condition of approval in the Development Order, let me know. Thanks. Wayne • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 9:14 AM To: Albee, Rick; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Doherty, Steve; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501-525 S. Belcher Rd, Gulf to Bay Plaza DRC Members - Plans were resubmitted for the above referenced project yesterday. Plans have been placed on top of the file cabinets across from our conference room (Rm 216). There are two sets of plans with updates dated 8/16/06. You may take a set if you desire (Scott and Rick - you already have a set of the updated plans). Please review as soon as you can (no later than Monday afternoon) and let me know if all of your comments are "met" or "not met" (needing to be further revised prior to the issuance of a Development Order). If any of your comments are still "not met" but are necessary to be included as a condition of approval in the Development Order, let me know. Thanks. Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:57 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501 S Belcher Wayne, When you issue the DO for the subject application, please include the following conditions. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Obtain FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the state road right-of-way. 2. Obtain Pinellas County permit for work in County R-O-W. 3. Close median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. nearest the Belcher Road and Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Intersection or submit letter from FDOT stating that closure of the median is not required. . 4. Provide 50-foot ingress and egress driveway radii for driveways along Belcher Road. 5. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 6. Provide a copy of signed and sealed soils report and double ring infiltrometer percolation test performed at the proposed retention pond bottom. 7. Provide complete drainage calculations including drainage calculations for storm inlet sizing and location on site. Prior to CO: 1. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com 1.45 Case Number: FLS2005-1209 -- 501 S BELCHER RD pm Owner(s): Ellis Co Ltd Po Box 1879 v Tarpon Springs, F134688 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Ellis & Co., Ltd. P.O. Box 1879 Tarpon Springs, 17134688 TELEPHONE: 727-938-0160, FAX: 727-938-0727, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: debra@northsideengineering.com Location: 10.56 acres located at the southeast corner of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Belcher Road. Atlas Page: 299A Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: (1) Flexible Standard Development approval to permit retail sales and services in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height of an additional 12.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck - roof deck at 24-foot height) and an additional 14.17 feet for architectural embellishments, under the provisions of Section 2-703.R; and (2) vacation of a 10-foot wide utility easement. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickart, Rick Albee, Tom Glenn Applicant: Doreen Williams, Housh Ghovaee, John Hotchkiss, Jim McClane, Paul Chissom, Brian Fisher, Carol Martin, Ron Belko The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: No Comments Environmental: No Comments Fire: I , Provide and show on the site plan 24 ft width at driveways / drive aisles for emergency vehicle ingress and egress for front and rear parking lots. Where drive way is split by an island with one-way traffic each side of island provide and show on site plan minimum 20 ft width driveway on each side or remove island to provide required width. PRIOR TO DO 4-18-2006 The driveway located at the west end on the north side shows a island which has to have a minimum of 20 feet in width on each side.(JFK). 8-3-06 The island in the west drive on Gulf To bay MUST be 20' on each side of the island for Fire Vehicle Access. If you choose to remove the Island you can have a 24' width.(JFK) Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 13 r 1 . 1/3/06-Revise par mg lot grades at tree #125 and 129 and any otherTree that may be impacted by proposed grades. Recommend consulting your arborist to discuss alternative designs to insure tree survivability. Modify prior to D.O. 4/27/06-Further consideration is needed at tree #125, proposed grades are still too severe. Revise prior to building permit. 8/1/06-Tree #125 is not indicated to be removed as stated. This tree has a high rating and is required to be preserved. Consult your arborist to discuss alternative designs to insure tree survivability prior to building permit. 2. 1/3/06-Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. 8/1/06- Provide the preservation report that accompanies the preservation plan prior to building permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 14 7/31/06 - WW ! • Response letter says the drainage outfall pipe has been relocated; however, it looks as though it is in the same place as the last submittal. This drainage outfall pipe now creates issues for trees within the interior landscape islands. Could this pipe be moved to the ends of the parking spaces and interior landscape islands (next to the drive aisle)? 5/12/06 - WW The drainage outfall pipe has now been moved eastward, which now creates issues for trees within the interior landscape islands. Could this pipe be moved to the ends of the parking spaces and interior landscape islands (next to the drive aisle)? Additionally, now a sanitary sewer line from Gulf to Bay is proposed to provide sanitary sewer service to Lease Area #1, running in the same location as the previous drainage outfall pipe. Can this pipe be run down the north/south drive aisle or be moved next to the west property line so that landscaping will not be planted directly over the pipe and the roots from the proposed trees will not impact the pipe? Also, the sanitary sewer pipe is being run right through Tree #18 at the northwest corner of Lease Area #1, which is supposedly being preserved (?). 12/27/06 - WW Coordinate the location of the retention pond outfall pipe along Belcher Road with the proposed landscaping, as it appears that the proposed landscaping is being place over the top of the pipe. Relocate the pipe closer to Belcher Road (Sheet C3.1), since it is better to have the landscaping closer to the pavement. 7/31/06 & 5/14/06 - WW Foundation width not dimensioned. Foundation landscaping not shown on north and northwest side of Retail "A". Suggest grouping palms west of Retail "B" to not block attached signage. 12/27/05 - WW Section 3-1202.E.2 requires foundation landscaping to have a landscape area at least five-foot wide and have at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade (facing the street). Landscape plan is deficient. Revise. 7/31/06 - WW Accent trees are missing from two areas north and south of northern freestanding sign where "12 VA" are shown. Add two accent trees to each area. 5/15/06 - WW There exist overhead utility lines along Belcher Road that are not being placed underground. As such, only accent trees should be planted within 20 feet of the overhead lines to prevent the need to trim the trees away from the overhead lines. Remember: Two accent trees equal one shade tree. Revise. Suggest relocating some of the shade trees to the north side of the parking lot adjacent to the retention pond. Sheet L1.1 - Proposed trees have been relocated away from water meter bank for Retal "A." However, this buffer still needs one tree per 35 feet of buffer area and since there are overhead power lines along this southern area, only accent trees can be planted along this southern edge (two accent trees = one shade tree). Revise. Site Data table indicates only 7.36% interior landscaping provided, whereas 10% is required (22,399 square feet); however, some areas have been counted that shouldn't and some areas haven't been counted that could. The area that cannot be counted is the lane divider in the northern driveway on Belcher Road (it is within the front perimeter buffer). The area on the south side of Retail "B" can be counted, as well as a portion of the landscape area on the north side of the easternmost parking row adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd north of Retail "A" (but the perimeter buffer west of the eastern driveway on Gulf to Bay Blvd. would also need to be planted so as to allow calculation of this area as interior landscaping). Recalculate. It is also noted that the landscape area south and east of Retail "B" is indicated as if there is a sidewalk between the doorway on the east side of the building and the sidewalk to the condominiums to the south. Based on Sheet C3.1, there is no sidewalk connector. Need to landscape this area (revise Sheet L1.1) and add into interior landscape calculations. Interior green space areas must meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 to qualify as interior green space (one shade tree per 150 sf of required interior green space. Two accent trees (crape myrtle and ligustrum tree) equal one shade tree; three palms equal one shade tree). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 15 6. Need to dimensio e width of ALL foundation landcape areas on S' eet C3.1. Based on Sheet L1.1, there is no foundation landscaping provided on the north and west sides of Retail A. Minimum width is five feet. Landscape in accordance with Code requirements on Sheet L1.1. 7. Sheet L-1 - Can you enlarge the note on Lease Area #1 regarding future landscaping to the same size as that shown for Lease Area #2? 8. Sheet L1.1 - In three interior landscape islands in the middle of the parking area west of Publix bald cypress trees are now indicated where Ligustrum Trees and Sable Palmettos were previously indicated. Bald cypress will not work in these islands. Return these islands to Ligustrum Trees and Sable Palmettos. 9. Sheet L1.1 - Landscape Table: a. I only count 19 WE (not 20). Recount/revise. b. I count 56 LT (not 54). Recount/revise. c. I count 1104 MJ (not 1039). Recount/revise. d. I count 535 VA (not 523). Recount/revise. e. I only count 647 IH (not 658). Recount/revise. f. I only count 456 AG (not 464). Recount/revise. 10. Sheet L-1 - North of the words "Retail A" there are two boxes that are not tied to any landscape area, one that is for 10 MJ and one for 10 MJ. They are not included in any of the plant counts previously commented on. Revise. 11 . Sheet L1.1 - There are some plant materials located on the north side of the southern driveway on Belcher Rd on the curved area next to the existing tree that is being removed that is not indicated as to what type of plants and the number of plants (they look like IS). Revise. Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stormwater: No Comments Solid Waste: 1 . 8-01-06 Compactors cut sheet shows length of unit 253" this will not fit in enclosure need to address how Sw will be handled. 5/15/06 - TJG For any compactor units, approval by the Director of Solid Waste is required. Provide a cut-sheet for approval. For Retail "A," the double dumpster will be shared by all tenants in Retail "A". The owner of the complex will incur all costs for such dumpsters (he can bill to the tenants). One dumpster is suggested be for cardboard recycling. For Retail "B," suggest two dumpsters (one for garbage and one for cardboard). All dumspters must be within enclosures. 12/19/05 - TJG Please explain solid waste service (double enclosure for retail A 14,000 Sq Ft and only single enclosure for 19,200 Sq Ft) angle for retail A enclosure not correct. please show Publix compactor location. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 16 Identify the land use for Lease Area 1 and Lease Area 2. NOT MET- IF RETAIL AREA 1 & 2 BECOMES A RESTAURANT, THEN APPLICANT MUST REVISE THE SUBMITTED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND MITIGATE ANY IMPACTS FROM THE EXPECTED TRIP VOLUMES GENERATED FROM THE SITE. APPLICANT MUST ACKNOWLEDGE THIS IN A LETTER. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - MET 2. Close median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. nearest the Belcher Road and Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. intersection. Thereby creating a longer westbound left turn lane for the major intersection and converting westernmost driveway to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. to be right-in and right-out only. NOT MET - CURRENTLY FDOT (DAN KARAS 727-570-5101 EXT. 35007) HAS SUPPORTED THIS CONDITION. NEED A LETTER FROM FDOT TO INDICATE NOT NECESSARY. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - Not Met 3. Show turning movement template for a WB-50 truck from the Southern most driveway on Belcher Road and Eastern most driveway on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. into the " loading zone". Truck must be able to go in and out of the loading zone in a forward direction without hitting curbs, buildings, objects, and etc.. NOT MET - TRUCK TRACKS APPEAR TO BE HITTING CURBS AND IN SOME AREAS CLOSE OF HITTING STUCTURES NEAR DUMSTER AND CARDBOARD BOX COMPACTOR AREAS. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - Not Met - Trucks entering site from Belcher only is unrealistic. Design shall accomodate a truck making a left turn from westbound lanes of Gulf to Bay into site. Path for trucks entering from Belcher shown on Sheet C3.1 indicate that trucks may not be able to clear raised curb at the west exit to Gulf to Bay, the median of Gulf to Bay, the solid wastw compactor pad and the dumpster enclosure. 5. The median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. must be designed to accommodate a WB-50 tuck both entering and exiting the driveway. NOT MET - SHOW TRUCK GOING W-B MAKING A LEFT INTO EASTERN DRIVEWAY. BE 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - See Comment #3. No sign is shown on Sheet C3.1. 6. Show the angle in degrees for the angular parking, the dimensions must comply to the City's parking lot standards. NOT MET - THE DEPTH FOR 60 DEGREE PARKING STALL MUST BE 20.5' LONG NOT 19' AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - Not Met 7/31/06 - Met 7. Provide crosswalk markings along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. and Belcher Road which must comply to current MUTCD standards. NOT MET - SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THIS CONDITION. PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN WITH NOTE. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - Not Met - Show crosswalks crossing driveways alnog Belcher Road and Gulf to Bay on Sheet C3.1. 8. Provide stops signs and stop bars where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. NOT MET - PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN WITH NOTE. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - Not Met - Provide stop signs for western driveway along Gulf to Bay, provide stop sign and right turn only sign for northern driveway along Belcher and delete stop sign at signalized driveway on Belcher Road. 9. Show design for right turn lanes on Belcher Road for project driveways. NOT MET - PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE PINELLAS COUNTY TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT INDICATING RIGHT TURN LANES IS NOT NECESSARY SINCE BELCHER ROAD IS MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY. BE 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - Not Met All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. General note: A. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. B. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. C. Provide necessary improvements to bring affected roadway network to the City's acceptable level of service (LOS) per Traffic Impact Study or as determined by Traffic Operation's Manager or designee. (Development Code Section: 4-802 & 4-803) The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Obtain FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the state road right-of-way. 2. Obtain Pinellas County permit for work in County R-O-W. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 17 1 . 7/28/06, 5/12/06 & 12/27/05 - WW Condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the vacation of the 10-foot wide utility easement be approved by City Council; 2. 7/31/06 & 5111105 - WW Not shown on elevations (no details, just "tenant" or "signage"). 12/27/05 - WW Show on the building elevations the locations of attached building signage (indicate as "signage" or "tenant"). 3 . 7/31/06, 5/12/06 & 5/27/05 - WW Condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records, with a copy of the recorded document submitted to the Planning Department. 4. 7/31/06 - WW Include as a condition of approval. 6/8/06 - WW After a meeting this morning with Housh Ghovaee and representatives of the developer, and after a subsequent site inspection, Michael Delk and I have determined that the four new power poles along the south property line (north of the mobile home park) can stay. There are existing utility lines along the east property line adjacent to the motel that may remain. All other utility poles are to be removed, either in Phase 1 or in Phase 2 of construction. As indicated by the developers, power for the shopping center will be brought from the new power poles underground to transformers to feed Retail A, Retail B and Publix. The existing utility line (which appears to be for cable or phone) along the north property line along Gulf to Bay Blvd. will be removed. It will be determined whether the utility pole on Gulf to Bay Blvd. at the northeast corner of the existing shopping center can or should be removed (hopefully removed). All utilities on-site will be underground. 5/12/06 - WW Site inspection along the south side of the property off Belcher Road (south of Publix) does not indicate any above ground utilities. Unclear what overhead utilities being referred to that need to be retained due to tree preservation (?). Advise. Code requires all on-site utilities to be placed underground. Based on a site inspection on 5/14/06, NEW overhead utilities have been installed on-site along the south side of the property adjacent to the existing mobile home park and on-site on the east side of Publix at its northeast corner. These overhead lines must be placed underground on-site (see discussion under 1/12/06) within the 10-foot wide proposed utility easement. Along the east side of Lease Area #2, there is only one tree that will be affected, which is adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd in the northeast corner of the property. Conduits can be directionally bored at this location to resolve the tree conflict. Based on a site inspection, there are also some overhead lines along Gulf to Bay Blvd east of the existing main shopping center driveway that appears to only serve the subject property. Likewise there were overhead lines that ran north to south behind the existing shopping center that also appears to serve the subject property only. It appears that these existing overhead lines can be removed. The removal of these overhead lines in both locations will be beneficial visually, as well as beneficial to the existing trees that the lines run through. Staff will not support above ground on-site utilities. Revise/advise. 1/12/06 - WW At the 1/5/06 DRC meeting, the applicant advised there were above ground utilities along the south property line off Belcher Road-that they want to retain. Additionally, there are existing above ground utilities serving the mobile home park coming off Gulf to Bay Boulevard that they want to relocate as above ground utilities to the east and south side of the property (adjacent to the motel and the north side of the mobile home park in the proposed 10-foot wide utility easement). After discussion with Neil Thompson, undergrounding these utilities appear practicable and should be required with the redevelopment of the property. 12/27/05 - WW All on-site utilities must be underground. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 18 5. 7/31/06,5/12/06& /5/06-WW 0 At the DRC meeting, it was agreed to make this a condition of approval in the Development Order that this be done prior to the issuance of any permits. 12/27/05 - WW Show the locations of parking lot lighting on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 and freestanding signage on Sheet L1.1. Coordinate such lighting locations, as well as freestanding signs, with proposed landscaping to ensure the proposed lights and signs will not be shielded by existing or future tree canopies and other landscape materials. 6. 7/31/06, 5/12/06 & 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting, it was agreed that a condition of approval in the Development Order is that these lease areas must meet Code - see comment below. 12/27/05 - WW To ensure that Lease Areas #1 and #2 can be developed with permitted uses (most likely retail or restaurants), show at least a conceptual design for each Lease Area to indicate adequate parking, landscaping, loading, traffic circulation and dumpster access will work. 7. 8/7/06 - WW Continuing to discuss parking reduction with Engineering. Will get back to you. 5/12/06 - WW Unclear of request. Response letter dated Jan. 11, 2006, but submitted April 11, 2006, states that "we wish to leave five spaces per 1,000 SF." Revised Exhibit "A" includes a parking reduction from five to four spaces per 1,000 square feet, however, no parking reduction study has been submitted. There is a discussion regarding parking in the response to Criteria #1 of the General Applicability criteria. Parking calculations on Sheet C1.1 indicates 438 spaces are required, however, only 405 spaces are being provided (which therefore appears to indicate a need for a parking reduction). Please clarify the request, the numbers and all application materials. If a parking reduction is really being requested, a parking reduction study must be submitted justifying the reduction. 12/27/06 - WW According to Urban Land Institute (ULI) standards and the range of required parking for retail sales, Staff would support a reduction of parking below five spaces per 1,000 sf to as low as four spaces per 1,000 sf (will need some type of a Parking Study justifying the reduction at least on the type of shopping center and types of use). This type of a neighborhood shopping center does not generate the need for five spaces per 1,000 sf (as a mall would) and a lower number of parking spaces would make greater use of, and promote a greater turnover of cars in, the provided parking. This also reduces the amount of impervious surface. Obviously, the location of spaces needs to reflect where needs are, but some of the outlying parking west of the grocery store may be able to be reduced/eliminated. 8 . 7/31/06 & 5/14/06 - WW Include as a condition of approval. 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting it was agreed that screening of the mechanical equipment be shown on plans prior to the issuance of building permits. 12/27/05 - WW Based on the elevations submitted, it appears the proposal has adequately screened from view the rooftop mechanical equipment. However, Section 3-201.1) requires the screening of mechanical equipment on all sides, including abutting properties. Need to address the rear of the shopping center. 9. 7/31/06 - WW Relocate the sidewalk ramp in front of the southern portion of Retail "B" to line up with the crosswalk from the handicap parking space. 5/12/06 - WW Eliminate the sidewalk between the handicap parking space and the single, angled space to the west of Retail "B" to increase interior landscape area and allow this area to qualify as interior landscaping. Relocate the crosswalk slightly northward to line up with the walk aisle for the handicap parking space (little piece of sidewalk, crosswalk and ramp). 10. 7/31/06 & 5/12/06 - WW Sheet C3.1 - Dimension the width of the driveway/drive aisle on the east side of the property (west of Lease Area #2) as it enters the mobile home park (it is less than 30 feet). 11 . 7/31/06 & 5/15/06 - WW Potential condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of building permits, dumpster enclosures be constructed of the same materials, and painted the same, as the building. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 19 12 . 7/31/06 - WW Sheet C3.1 and L1.1 - Wheel stops are required adjacent for parking spaces adjacent to landscaped areas (single space west of Retail "B," along east side of Lease Area #1 and spaces that have the vehicles front to landscape islands). 5/15/06 - WW Sheet C3.1 and L1.1 - Wheel stops are required adjacent for parking spaces adjacent to landscaped areas (single space west of Retail "B," spaces south of Retail "A," spaces adjacent to Gulf to Bay Blvd [all rows], spaces adjacent to Belcher Road and along east side of Lease Area #1 and spaces that have the vehicles front to landscape islands). Other: No Comments Notes: Prior to issuance of a Development Order, submit five revised sets of application material addressing all DRC comments by June 5, 2006, or FLS will be void for failure to timely address DRC comments. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 20 • 0 Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:15 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2005-12098, 501-525 S. Belcher Road Still Not Met, Updated comments to be addressed prior to building permit. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, 3uly 31, 2006 2:35 PM To: Albee, Rick; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Doherty, Steve; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLS2005-12098, 501-525 S. Belcher Road DRC members - The above referenced project has been resubmitted and copies are located on top of the file cabinets by Rm. 216 (conference room) in our office. Sherry notified you of such resubmittal by email on July 21, 2006. Some DRC members still need to review the resubmittal documents. Please review the resubmittal to determine whether your comments are "met" or "not met." Please let me know when you have completed your review. If possible, please review by 2:30 pm on Wednesday, August 2, 2006. Wayne • • Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 1:44 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501 S Belcher Wayne, There are several traffic issues that have not been resolved. 2. Close median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. nearest the Belcher Road and Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. intersection. Thereby creating a longer westbound left turn lane for the major intersection and converting westernmost driveway to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. to be right-in and right-out only. NOT MET - CURRENTLY FDOT (DAN KARAS 727-570-5101 EXT. 35007) HAS SUPPORTED THIS CONDITION. NEED A LETTER FROM FDOT TO INDICATE NOT NECESSARY. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - Not Met 3. Show turning movement template for a WB-50 truck from the Southern most driveway on Belcher Road and Eastern most driveway on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. into the " loading zone". Truck must be able to go in and out of the loading zone in a forward direction without hitting curbs, buildings, objects, and etc.. NOT MET - TRUCK TRACKS APPEAR TO BE HITTING CURBS AND IN SOME AREAS CLOSE OF HITTING STUCTURES NEAR DUMSTER AND CARDBOARD BOX COMPACTOR AREAS. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - Not Met - Trucks entering site from Belcher only is unrealistic. Design shall accommodate a truck making a left turn from westbound lanes of Gulf to Bay into site. Path for trucks entering from Belcher shown on Sheet C3.1 indicate that trucks may not be able to clear raised curb at the west exit to Gulf to Bay, the median of Gulf to Bay, the solid waste compactor pad and the dumpster enclosure. 5. The median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. must be designed to accommodate a WB-50 truck both entering and exiting the driveway. NOT MET - SHOW TRUCK GOING W-B MAKING A LEFT INTO EASTERN DRIVEWAY. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - See Comment #3. No sign is shown on Sheet C3.1. 7. Provide crosswalk markings along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. and Belcher Road which must comply to current MUTCD standards. NOT MET - SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THIS CONDITION. PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN WITH NOTE. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - Not Met - Show crosswalks crossing driveways along Belcher Road and Gulf to Bay on Sheet C3.1. 8. Provide stops signs and stop bars where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. NOT MET - PLEASE DRAW ON SITE PLAN WITH NOTE. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - Not Met - Provide stop signs for western driveway along Gulf to Bay, provide stop sign and right turn only sign for northern driveway along Belcher and delete stop sign at signalized driveway on Belcher Road. 9. Show design for right turn lanes on Belcher Road for project driveways. NOT MET - PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE PINELLAS COUNTY TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT INDICATING RIGHT TURN LANES IS NOT NECESSARY SINCE BELCHER ROAD IS MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY. B_E 4/14/2006 7/31/06 - Not Met All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager N%Wl 727-562-4781 swop s cott. rice@MyClearwa ter.. com Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 2:35 PM To: Albee, Rick; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Doherty, Steve; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLS2005-12098, 501-525 S. Belcher Road DRC members - The above referenced project has been resubmitted and copies are located on top of the file cabinets by Rm. 216 (conference room) in our office. Sherry notified you of such resubmittal by email on July 21, 2006. Some DRC members still need to review the resubmittal documents. Please review the resubmittal to determine whether your comments are "met" or "not met." Please let me know when you have completed your review. If possible, please review by 2:30 pm on Wednesday, August 2, 2006. Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 4:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: 501 S Belcher Road FLS2005-12098 Planner Wayne Wells Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 shernj. wa tkins @myclearwa ter. corn -----Original Message----- From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 3:56 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: 501 S Belcher Road FLS2005-12098 Planner Wayne Wells Sherry, P&R has no issues with this case and I have updated Tidemark to reflect today's date. Thanks and have a great weekend! Debbie O -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 2:52 PM To: Buzzell, William; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Reid, Debbie; Tracy Harmon; US Post Office (E-mail) Subject: 501 S Belcher Road FLS2005-12098 Planner Wayne Wells Good Afternoon DRC Members, Plans have been resubmitted for 501 S Belcher Road FLS2005-12098 I have placed copies outside room 216 for your review if you would like to take a copy please do. Please review before Friday, July 28, 2006. Thank you, Sherny L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkins@myclearzvater.com 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 2:52 PM To: Buzzell, William; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Reid, Debbie; Tracy Harmon; US Post Office (E-mail) Subject: 501 S Belcher Road FLS2005-12098 Planner Wayne Wells Good Afternoon DRC Members, Plans have been resubmitted for 501 S Belcher Road FLS2005-12098 I have placed copies outside room 216 for your review if you would like to take a copy please do. Please review before Friday, July 28, 2006. Thank you, Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkiris@myclearwater.com 0 0 (,e/o/off 0 0 u / ? I 0?, 0 0 0 0 J __ ?.. _. a Y? F a'? C Awl y y ? u [? to(, • • Lf 1 v 1 vu V v , v w 0 0 (-of ?bj 0 vu b YF:: F ,s-/t 410 ? • • .-,MgdME6 -S-/f 4/ 0 u 4 ?-// 4) 0 (a 0 0 a #T- sj,41 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:47 AM To: Glenn, Tom Subject: RE: FLS2005-12098 - 501 S. Belcher Road I have the plans in my office. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Glenn, Tom Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:46 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2005-12098 - 501 S. Belcher Road OK Tom Glenn Solid Waste Program Coordinator 727-562-4930 cell 727-224-7388 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 4:19 PM To: Glenn, Tom Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501 S. Belcher Road Tom - There is still an outstanding Solid Waste comment for this project. This is the shopping center at the corner of Gulf to Bay and Belcher with Publix. I am trying to clear up all comments. Your comment is: "Please explain solid waste service (double enclosure for retail A 14,000 Sq Ft and only single enclosure for 19,200 Sq Ft) angle for retail A enclosure not correct. Please show Publix compactor location." Would you be able to come by on Monday and look at the plans to see if your comment can be shown as "met"? Wayne I r )80:1% 1.45 pm Case Number: FLS2005-12098 -- 501- 525 S BELCHER RD • Owner(s): Ellis Co Ltd ' Po Box 1879 Tarpon Springs, Fl 34688 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Ellis & Co., Ltd. P.O. Box 1879 Tarpon Springs, F134688 TELEPHONE: 727-938-0160, FAX: 727-938-0727, E-MAIL: No Email GV.M#*%4t Representative: Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: debra@northsideengineering.com Location: 10.56 acres located at the southeast corner of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Belcher Road. Atlas Page: 299A Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: (1) Flexible Standard Development approval to permit retail sales and services in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height of an additional 12.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck - roof deck at 24-foot height) and an additional 14.17 feet for architectural embellishments, under the provisions of Section 2-703.R; and (2) vacation of a 10-foot wide utility easement. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickart, Rick Albee, Tom Glenn Applicant: Doreen Williams, Housh Ghovaee, John Hotchkiss, Jim McClane, Paul Chissom, Brian Fisher, Carol Martin, Ron Belko The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 27 1. Applicant shall submit a complete vacation application for the 10-foot drainage and utility easement prior to issuance of the Development Order. 2. How will water and sewer be provided for Lease Area #1? The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit: 2. A net increase in water meter sizes for this site will require payment of water and sewer impact fees. 3. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from D.O.T. 4. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County. 5. Need a copy of an approved D.E.P. permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Will building be provided with fire sprinkler systems? If yes, show location of all Fire Department Connections. 7. If required, any additional fire hydrant assembly shall be installed to meet Fire Department Regulations. A fire hydrant assembly cannot be restricted by any backflow prevention device. All applicable fees shall be paid by applicant. 8. Provide applicable details for dumpster enclosures; new dumpster enclosures: Maximum 6'-0" high and constructed of concrete block. Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building, see City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701. 9. Demolition permit shall include cutting and capping the existing sanitary sewer connection to manhole in Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 10. If an unrestricted fire line is required, applicant shall convey a water line easement to the City. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . Dry Detention systems must contain a grassed bottom and designed with no steeper than 4:1 side slope. Provide cross-section for the pond(s). Fire: 1 , Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO DO. 2. FDC's are required, and shall be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve. PRIOR TO DO 3 . Provide and show on the site plan 24 ft width at driveways / drive aisles for emergency vehicle ingress and egress for front and rear parking lots. Where drive way is split by an island with one-way traffic each side of island provide and show on site plan minimum 20 ft width driveway on each side or remove island to provide required width. PRIOR TO DO. 4. Relocate exsisting fire hydrant located east of west entrance off Gulf To Bay to the entrance for a more direct usage PRIOR TO DO Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 28 I . Show all of the trees with their canopies on all plan sheets prior to •. This data is needed to determine if additional trees with a #3 rating or above can be preserved by modifmg the proposed layout. Additional comment may be forthcoming once this data is reviewed. 2. Revise parking lot grades at tree #125 and 129 and any other tree that may be impacted by proposed grades. Recommend consulting your arborist to discuss alternative designs to insure tree survivability. Modify prior to D.O. 3 . Additional consideration must be given to the oak trees along the east, south and west property lines. Zoning comment #39 may allow for additional green space to accomplish this. Modify plans prior to D.O. 4. Consideration must be given to all trees to be preserved if overhead utilities are to be placed underground. Modify plans prior to D.O. 5 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 29 1 . Per Section 3-1200 .1 Code requires a minimum of 10% interior g• space of gross vehicular use area (VUA). Based on the proposed VUA listed in the Site Data table on Sheet Cl.1, there should be 22,399 square feet of interior green space provided. Need to provide in e the Site Data table the required and provided interior green space. Sheet C2.1 indicates 12,190 sf of interior green space provided. Interior green space areas must meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 to qualify as interior green space. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10 parking spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft. and be 8 feet wide of green space from back of curb to back of curb. Many islands do not meet the minimum width requirement. Parking space widths exceed Code minimum requirement. Suggest reducing the width of parking spaces to the minimum requirement to meet the minimum landscape island widths. Staff will not support a reduction to the minimum interior green space requirement. Staff would support a reduction to required number of parking spaces below five spaces per 1,000 sf. J2. Dimension the width of interior and terminal green space islands (many are not a typical width). Dimension the width of the foundation landscape areas. Must plant the foundation landscape 0/ C? areas per Code requirements of Section 3-1202.E.2. Care should be given to location of required trees to avoid shielding attached signage (views from roadways and/or parking areas). J4 . Indicate on the Site Plan Sheet C2.1 and the Landscape Plan Sheet Ll.I the location of existing trees and indicate which trees are to be preserved and removed. J5. Based on the existing and proposed buffer width along the east (rear) property line behind the grocery store and Retail B and the proposed buffer width along the south property line (south of Retail B), it appears that existing trees can be preserved. Revise the landscape plan to show these trees to remain and show trees to be planted in areas where the existing tree canopy will provide for new tree growth (do not plant new trees under the existing tree canopy of trees to be preserved). J6 . Sheet C2.1 - Show the landscape terminal island at the northeast corner of Lease Area #1 to be curbed. J7 . In order to preserve the proposed landscaping along the south side of Lease Area #1 during construction of the improvements on Lease Area #1, suggest installing a vertical curb along the north side of the landscape strip. J 8 . 1/5/06 - WW - At the DRC meeting, the condition was changed to: As previously recommended prior to submittal, revise Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 to show the installation. of a six-foot high vinyl PVC fence along the east and south property lines behind the shopping center adjacent to the condominiums to the south and the mobile home park to the east and south. Incorporate gates for continued pedestrian access to the condominiums and mobile home park at the locations indicated. 12/27/05 - WW As previously recommended prior to submittal, revise Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 to show the installation of a six-foot high masonry wall along the east and south property lines behind the shopping center adjacent to the condominiums to the south and the mobile home park to the east and south. A post and lintel system should be employed to minimize damage to existing trees and their root systems that should be preserved along those property lines. Incorporate gates for continued pedestrian access to the condominiums and mobile home park at the locations indicated. J9 . Sheet C2.1 - Curb the north half of the interior landscape island proposed at the northwest corner of Lease Area #1 and curb the east end of the parking area south of Lease Area #2. 90 Coordinate the location of the retention pond outfall pipe along Belcher Road with the proposed landscaping, as it appears that the proposed landscaping is being place over the top of the pipe. Relocate the pipe closer to Belcher Road (Sheet C3.1), since it is better to have the landscaping closer to the pavement. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 30 1 Sheet L1.1 - Landscape Table: . • a. I only count 1149 VS, however, the row of VS behind the grocery store and Retail B along the east property line is not indicated how many are in this row; b. Relocate the landscape code name and quantities under the words "retention area" on both areas along Gulf to Bay Blvd., as I cannot read them; c. Move the proposed DH and XA into the actual interior landscape island north of the northern driveway on Belcher Road; d. I count 924 PJ, where you only say 894. Check/revise; e. I only count 32 MG, where you say 34; however, there are two trees with the symbol of MG south of the eastern retention pond not labeled. Revise; f I only count 338 VA, where you say 364. Check/revise; g. I only count 23 LT, where you say 25. Check/revise; h. I count 791 MJ, where you say 780. Check/revise; i. I only count 16 DH, where you say 19. However, to the rear of Retail B next to the dumpster it appears one DH not counted, as well as one DH appears to the west side of the western retention pond next to Belcher Road not counted. Check/revise; and j. I only count 399 XA, where you say 446. Check/revise. 12 Section 3-1202.E. I requires one shade tree per 150 sf of required interior green space. Two accent trees (crape myrtle and ligustrum tree) equal one shade tree; three palms equal one shade tree. Some islands, which should have two shade trees only have one accent tree or three palms, which does not meet the Code requirement. Revise. rt ?l Section 3-1202.E.2 requires foundation landscaping to have a landscape area at least five-foot ?? wide and have at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade (facing the street). Landscape plan is deficient. Revise. Parks and Recreation: 1 , No issues - redevelopment of existing shopping center to a new shopping center - increase of floor area only 10%. Stormwater: 1 . Prior to issuance of a building permit the following conditions are to be met: 1)Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit 2)Provide a copy of signed and sealed soils report and double ring infiltrometer percolation test performed at the proposed retention pond bottom. 3)Provide complete drainage calculations including drainage calculations for storm inlet sizing and location on site. Solid Waste: 1 , Please explain solid waste service (double enclosure for retail A 14,000 Sq Ft and only single enclosure for 19,200 Sq Ft) angle for retail A enclosure not correct. please show Publix compactor location. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 31 Identify the landfor Lease Area 1 and Lease Area 2. • 2. Close median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. nearest the Belcher Road and Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. intersection. Thereby creating a longer westbound left turn lane for the major intersection and converting westernmost driveway to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. to be right-in and right-out only. 3. Create a westbound left turn lane on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. for eastern median break into the driveway per FDOT standards as indicated in the submitted Traffic Impact Anaysis 12/16/2005. 4. Show turning movement template for a WB-50 truck from the Southern most driveway on Belcher Road and Eastern most driveway on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. into the " loading zone". Truck must be able to go in and out of the loading zone in a forward direction without hitting curbs, buildings, objects, and etc.. 5. The median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. must be designed to accommodate a WB-50 truck both entering and exiting the driveway. 6. Show the angle in degrees for the angular parking, the dimensions must comply to the City's parking lot standards. 7. Provide crosswalk markings along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. and Belcher Road which must comply to current MUTCD standards. 8. Provide stops signs and stop bars where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. 9. Show design for right turn lanes on Belcher Road for project driveways. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. General note: A. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. B. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. C. Provide necessary improvements to bring affected roadway network to the City's acceptable level of service (LOS) per Traffic Impact Study or as determined by Traffic Operation's Manager or designee. (Development Code Section: 4-802 & 4-803) The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Obtain FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the state road right-of-way. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 32 i 0 1 Condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the vacation of the 10-foot wide utility easement be approved by City Council; 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting it was agreed to leave the loading area as shown on the plan, but to provide a striped access walkway north of the loading area and adjacent to the parking spaces to allow access to the sidewalk to the individual tenant spaces. 12/27/05 - WW The loading area behind the grocery store is dedicated for that store. Relocate the single loading space behind Retail A to be adjacent to the building to provide a loading space for those stores. J3. Reposition double dumpster behind grocery store to allow truck to pick up with the truck coming from the east. Freestanding and attached signage is not approved with this application. A Comprehensive Sign Program will be necessary to be submitted for approval (based on two freestanding signs on Gulf to Bay Boulevard Belcher Road and assumed desired for Lease Areas #1 and #2). Signs will need to meet the required five-foot setback. All freestanding signs must be coordinated with the color and materials of the shopping center and/or buildings on the lease areas. O Show on the building elevations the locations of attached building signage (indicate as "signage" O or "tenant"). Condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records, with a copy of the recorded document submitted to the Planning Department. 0 1/12/06 - WW p q ? At the 1/5/06 DRC meeting, the applicant advised there were above ground utilities along the there are existing Additionally line off Belcher Road that they want to retain south ro ert , . p p y above ground utilities serving the mobile home park coming off Gulf to Bay Boulevard that they want to relocate as above ground utilities to the east and south side of the property (adjacent to fi the motel and the north side of the mobile home park in the proposed 10-foot wide utility easement). After discussion with Neil Thompson, undergrounding these utilities appear practicable and should be required with the redevelopment of the property. 12/27/05 - WW All on-site utilities must be underground. 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting, it was agreed to make this a condition of approval in the Development Order that this be done prior to the issuance of any permits. 12/27/05 - WW Show the locations of parking lot lighting on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 and freestanding signage on Sheet Ll.1. Coordinate such lighting locations, as well as freestanding signs, with proposed landscaping to ensure the proposed lights and signs will not be shielded by existing or future tree canopies and other landscape materials. O 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting, it was agreed that a condition of approval in the Development Order is that these lease areas must meet Code - see comment below. 12/27/05 - WW To ensure that Lease Areas #1 and #2 can be developed with permitted uses (most likely retail or restaurants), show at least a conceptual design for each Lease Area to indicate adequate parking, / landscaping, loading, traffic circulation and dumpster access will work. WW / 2/06 V 10 . 1 1 - At the 1/5/06 DRC meeting, we were advised this easement is for relocated overhead utility lines (see prior Planning DRC comment regarding the need to underground existing overhead utilities). 12/27/05 - WW Unclear why the 10-foot wide easement is proposed along the east side of Lease Area #2. 11 . Advise. Condition of approval: That no building permit be issued until the billboard is removed or J compliance is achieved with all applicable sign ordinances. f R il B 12 . eta , Sheet C2.1 - Unclear the need for the pedestrian crosswalk at the southwest corner o since it does not appear to connect with any sidewalk to the south of this property. Advise/remove. f 13 . Sheet C2.1 - Dimension the width of the 90-degree parking spaces west of Retail B and southern portion of grocery store and the parking row along Belcher Road (appear to be nine-foot wide spaces). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 33 J14. Coordinate/show fSheets C2.1 and L1.1 the column locations, covered walkways and overhangs indicated on the building site/floor plans (Sheets A1.1, A2.1, A2.2), as to sidewalks and foundation landscape areas. 15 Unless already recorded (and, if so, provide a copy of the recorded document), need to record a cross-access easement with the eye clinic to the south and the mobile home park to the south prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (condition of approval). 116. By Code provisions, only nine handicap parking spaces are required. Suggest reducing to the minimum required. Also, suggest relocating one of the nine required handicap spaces to the west of Retail B to provide more direct and closer handicap access to this retail space. ®7 According to Urban Land Institute (ULI) standards and the range of required parking for retail sales, Staff would support a reduction of parking below five spaces per 1,000 sf to as low as four spaces per 1,000 sf (will need some type of a Parking Study justifying the reduction at least on the type of shopping center and types of use). This type of a neighborhood shopping center does not generate the need for five spaces per 1,000 sf (as a mall would) and a lower number of parking spaces would make greater use of, and promote a greater turnover of cars in, the provided parking. This also reduces the amount of impervious surface. Obviously, the location of spaces needs to reflect where needs are, but some of the outlying parking west of the grocery store may be able to be reduced/eliminated. J18 . Sheet C1.1 - The aerial map is too dark to even see the site. Lighten up. 19 Sheet C2.1 - Dimension the width of the main driveway/drive aisle on the east side of the property (west of Lease Area #2) and as it enters the mobile home park to the south. J20 . Unclear how Lease Area #1 is being serviced with water and sewer. Revise Sheet C3.1. ®1 Parking lot design does not provide for shopping cart return corrals. Revise Sheet C2.1 to show the corrals. Code permits a maximum parapet of 30 inches from the highest roof deck elevation. The Planning Department has advertised a requested increase for the parapet for the grocery store of 10.17 feet (or 34.17 feet) above the roof deck at (24.0 feet). The parapet for Retail B is shown 12.5 feet above the highest roof deck (assumed to be 26 feet, since it is not indicated on "3 - Rear Elevation"; which is in conflict with the 24.0 feet indicated on "2 - Front Elevation"). Additionally, the parapet in the middle of Retail A is shown at 9.67 feet above the highest roof deck (assumed to be 20.0 feet, since it is not indicated on "4 - Rear Elevation"; which is in conflict with the 18.0 feet indicated on "2 - Front Elevation"). In all three instances, the parapet height is excessive and Staff will not support such a parapet height. No justification has been submitted for such parapet height. It appears that the proposed height is only to accommodate increased attached signage. Reduce the parapet height to something more reasonable, potentially in the five-to-six foot height (which is double or more than double the minimum). In concert with the reduction to the parapet height, the height of the hip-roofed structures should also be reduced proportionally. 123 . Elevations - In "3 - Rear Elevation" there is a higher portion of the building in the center of the grocery store (greater than 34.17 feet) that is not reflected on "1 - Front Elevation". Revise. J24 . Elevations - "1 - Front Elevation" - It would seem that the center hip-roofed covered walkway for the grocery store would have greater importance than the two hip-roofed structures on the ends of the grocery store. Revise/advise. 25 1/5/06 - WW At the DRC meeting it was agreed that screening of the mechanical equipment be shown on plans prior to the issuance of building permits. Cot. 12/27/05 - WW Based on the elevations submitted, it appears the proposal has adequately screened from view the rooftop mechanical equipment. However, Section 3-201.D requires the screening of mechanical equipment on all sides, including abutting properties. Need to address the rear of the shopping center. 26 . Unclear what material the "awnings" are made of in the center of Retail A (Suites 105-107) and on the front of Suite 111. Indicate on plans. 27 . Code requires all on-site utilities be located underground. Based on a site inspection, there are some overhead lines along Gulf to Bay Blvd east of the existing main shopping center driveway that appears to only serve the subject property. Likewise there are overhead lines that run north to south behind the existing shopping center that also appears to serve the subject property only. It appears that these existing overhead lines can be removed. The removal of these overhead lines in both locations will be beneficial visually, as well as beneficial to the existing trees that the lines run through. Revise/advise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 34 Other: No Comments Notes: Prior to issuance of a Development Order, submit five revised sets of application material addressing all DRC comments by June 5, 2006, or FLS will be void for failure to timely address DRC comments. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 35 C 0 72 fAHO 1:45 pm Case Number: FLS2005-12098 -- 501- 525 S BELCHER RD ' O Owners : Ellis Co Ltd Po Box 1879 Tarpon Springs, Fl 34688 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email DEC Applicant Ellis & Co., Ltd. P.O. Box 1879 Tarpon Springs, F134688 TELEPHONE: 727-938-0160, FAX: 727-938-0727, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: debra@northsideengineering.com Location: 10.56 acres located at the southeast corner of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Belcher Road. Atlas Page: 299A Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: (1) Flexible Standard Development approval to permit retail sales and services in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement); a reduction to the front (west) setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (cast) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height of an additional 12.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck - roof deck at 24-foot height) and an additional 14.17 feet for architectural embellishments, under the provisions of Section 2-703.R; and (2) vacation of a 10-foot wide utility easement. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickart, Rick Albee Applicant: Doreen Williams, Housh Ghovaee, Trish Rodebaugh The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 30 1. Applicant shall !kt a complete vacation application for the 10-tooc drainage and utility easement prior to issuance of the Development Order. 2. How will water and sewer be provided for Lease Area #1? The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit: 2. A net increase in water meter sizes for this site will require payment of water and sewer impact fees. 3. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from D.O.T. 4. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County. 5. Need a copy of an approved D.E.P. permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Will building be provided with fire sprinkler systems? If yes, show location of all Fire Department Connections. 7. If required, any additional fire hydrant assembly shall be installed to meet Fire Department Regulations. A fire hydrant assembly cannot be restricted by any backflow prevention device. All applicable fees shall be paid by applicant. 8. Provide applicable details for dumpster enclosures; new dumpster enclosures: Maximum 6-0" high and constructed of concrete block. Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building, see City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701. 9. Demolition permit shall include cutting and capping the existing sanitary sewer connection to manhole in Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 10. If an unrestricted fire line is required, applicant shall convey a water line easement to the City. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . Dry Detention systems must contain a grassed bottom and designed with no steeper than 4:1 side slope. Provide cross-section for the pond(s). Fire: 1 . Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO DO. 2. FDC's are required, and shall be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve. PRIOR TO DO 3 . Provide and show on the site plan 24 ft width at driveways / drive aisles for emergency vehicle ingress and egress for front and rear parking lots. Where drive way is split by an island with one-way traffic each side of island provide and show on site plan minimum 20 ft width driveway on each side or remove island to provide required width. PRIOR TO DO. 4. Relocate exsisting fire hydrant located east of west entrance off Gulf To Bay to the entrance for a more direct usage PRIOR TO DO Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 31 1 . Show all of the 0rees with their canopies on all plan sheets prior toq. This data is needed to determine if additional trees with a #3 rating or above can be preserved by modifing the proposed layout. Additional comment may be forthcoming once this data is reviewed. 2. Revise parking lot grades at tree #125 and 129 and any other tree that may be impacted by proposed grades. Recommend consulting your arborist to discuss alternative designs to insure tree survivability. Modify prior to D.O. 3 . Additional consideration must be given to the oak trees along the east, south and west property lines. Zoning comment #39 may allow for additional green space to accomplish this. Modify plans prior to D.O. 4. Consideration must be given to all trees to be preserved if overhead utilities are to be placed underground. Modify plans prior to D.O. 5 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 32 1 . Per Section 3-1202.E.1 Code requires a minimum of 10% interior green space of gross O vehicular use area (VUA). Based on the proposed VUA listed in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1, there should be 22,399 square feet of interior green space provided. Need to provide in the Site Data table the required and provided interior green space. Sheet C2.1 indicates 12,190 sf of interior green space provided. Interior green space areas must meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 to qualify as interior green space. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10 parking spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft. and be 8 feet wide of green space from back of curb to back of curb. Many islands do not meet the minimum width requirement. Parking space widths exceed Code minimum requirement. Suggest reducing the width of parking spaces to the minimum requirement to meet the minimum landscape island widths. Staff will not support a reduction to the minimum interior green space requirement. Staff would support a reduction to required number of parking spaces below five spaces per 1,000 sf. J2 . Dimension the width of interior and terminal green space islands (many are not a typical width). Dimension the width of the foundation landscape areas. Must plant the foundation landscape ,? _ areas per Code requirements of Section 3-1202.E.2. Care should be given to location of iLfI required trees to avoid shielding attached signage (views from roadways and/or parking areas). 14. Indicate on the Site Plan Sheet C2.1 and the Landscape Plan Sheet L1.1 the location of existing trees and indicate which trees are to be preserved and removed. 5 . Based on the existing and proposed buffer width along the east (rear) property line behind the grocery store and Retail B and the proposed buffer width along the south property line (south of Retail B), it appears that existing trees can be preserved. Revise the landscape plan to show these trees to remain and show trees to be planted in areas where the existing tree canopy will provide for new tree growth (do not plant new trees under the existing tree canopy of trees to be preserved). 6. Sheet C2.1 - Show the landscape terminal island at the northeast corner of Lease Area #1 to be curbed. 7 . In order to preserve the proposed landscaping along the south side of Lease Area #1 during construction of the improvements on Lease Area #1, suggest installing a vertical curb along the north side of the landscape strip. 8. As previously recommended prior to submittal, revise Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 to show the installation of a six-foot high masonry wall along the east and south property lines behind the shopping center adjacent to the condominiums to the south and the mobile home park to the east and south. A post and lintel system should be employed to minimize damage to existing trees and their root systems that should be preserved along those property lines. Incorporate gates for continued pedestrian access to the condominiums and mobile home park at the locations indicated. 9 . Sheet C2.1 - Curb the north half of the interior landscape island proposed at the northwest corner of Lease Area #1 and curb the east end of the parking area south of Lease Area #2. 10. Coordinate the location of the retention pond outfall pipe along Belcher Road with the proposed landscaping, as it appears that the proposed landscaping is being place over the top of the pipe. Relocate the pipe closer to Belcher Road (Sheet C3.1), since it is better to have the landscaping closer to the pavement. 11 . Sheet L1.1 -Landscape Table: a. I only count 1149 VS, however, the row of VS behind the grocery store and Retail B along the east property line is not indicated how many are in this row; b. Relocate the landscape code name and quantities under the words "retention area" on both areas along Gulf to Bay Blvd., as I cannot read them; c. Move the proposed DH and XA into the actual interior landscape island north of the northern driveway on Belcher Road; d. I count 924 PJ, where you only say 894. Check/revise; e. I only count 32 MG, where you say 34; however, there are two trees with the symbol of MG south of the eastern retention pond not labeled. Revise; f I only count 338 VA, where you say 364. Check/revise; g. I only count 23 LT, where you say 25. Check/revise; h. I count 791 MJ, where you say 780. Check/revise; i. I only count 16 DH, where you say 19. However, to the rear of Retail B next to the dumpster it appears one DH not counted, as well as one DH appears to the west side of the western retention pond next to Belcher Road not counted. Check/revise; and j. I only count 399 XA, where you say 446. Check/revise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 33 • 12 , Section 3-1202.E.1 requires one shade tree per 150 sf of required interior green space. Two accent trees (crape myrtle and ligustrum tree) equal one shade tree; three palms equal one shade tree. Some islands, which should have two shade trees only have one accent tree or three palms, which does not meet the Code requirement. Revise. 13 . Section 3-1202.E.2 requires foundation landscaping to have a landscape area at least five-foot wide and have at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade (facing the street). Landscape plan is deficient. Revise. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - redevelopment of existing shopping center to a new shopping center - increase of floor area only 10%. Stormwater: 1 . Prior to issuance of a building permit the following conditions are to be met: 1)Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit 2)Provide a copy of signed and sealed soils report and double ring infiltrometer percolation test performed at the proposed retention pond bottom. 3)Provide complete drainage calculations including drainage calculations for storm inlet sizing and location on site. Solid Waste: 1 , Please explain solid waste service (double enclosure for retail A 14,000 Sq Ft and only single enclosure for 19,200 Sq Ft) angle for retail A enclosure not correct. please show Publix compactor location. Traffic Engineering: 1 , Identify the land use for Lease Area 1 and Lease Area 2. 2. Close median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. nearest the Belcher Road and Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. intersection. Thereby creating a longer westbound left turn lane for the major intersection and converting westernmost driveway to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. to be right-in and right-out only. 3. Create a westbound left turn lane on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. for eastern median break into the driveway per FDOT standards as indicated in the submitted Traffic Impact Anaysis 12/16/2005. 4. Show turning movement template for a WB-50 truck from the Southern most driveway on Belcher Road and Eastern most driveway on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. into the " loading zone". Truck must be able to go in and out of the loading zone in a forward direction without hitting curbs, buildings, objects, and etc.. 5. The median opening on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. must be designed to accommodate a WB-50 truck both entering and exiting the driveway. 6. Show the angle in degrees for the angular parking, the dimensions must comply to the City's parking lot standards. 7. Provide crosswalk markings along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. and Belcher Road which must comply to current MUTCD standards. 8. Provide stops signs and stop bars where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. 9. Show design for right turn lanes on Belcher Road for project driveways. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. General note: A. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. B. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. C. Provide necessary improvements to bring affected roadway network to the City's acceptable level of service (LOS) per Traffic Impact Study or as determined by Traffic Operation's Manager or designee. (Development Code Section: 4-802 & 4-803) The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Obtain FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the state road right-of-way. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 34 1 . Condition of appro. • That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the vacation of the 10-foot wide utility easement be approved by City Council; 2. Need to record, unless one already exists, a pedestrian access easement with the condominiums to the south and the mobile home park to the east (prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy). Q The loading area behind the grocery store is dedicated for that store. Relocate the single loading space behind Retail A to be adjacent to the building to provide a loading space for those stores. 4. Reposition double dumpster behind grocery store to allow truck to pick up with the truck coming from the east: 5. Freestanding and attached signage is not approved with this application. A Comprehensive Sign Program will be necessary to be submitted for approval (based on two freestanding signs on Gulf to Bay Boulevard Belcher Road and assumed desired for Lease Areas #1 and #2). Signs will need to meet the required five-foot setback. All freestanding signs must be coordinated with the color and materials of the shopping center and/or buildings on the lease areas. 6. Show on the building elevations the locations of attached building signage (indicate as "signage" or "tenant"). 7. Condition of approval: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records, with a copy of the recorded document submitted to the Planning Department. 8. All on-site utilities must be underground. 9. Show the locations of parking lot lighting on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 and freestanding signage on Sheet Ll.1. Coordinate such lighting locations, as well as freestanding signs, with proposed landscaping to ensure the proposed lights and signs will not be shielded by existing or future tree canopies and other landscape materials. 10. To ensure that Lease Areas #1 and #2 can be developed with permitted uses (most likely retail or restaurants), show at least a conceptual design for each Lease Area to indicate adequate parking, landscaping, loading, traffic circulation and dumpster access will work. 11. Unclear why the 10-foot wide easement is proposed along the east side of Lease Area #2. Advise. 12. Condition of approval: That no building permit be issued until the billboard is removed or compliance is achieved with all applicable sign ordinances. 13 . Sheet C2.1 - Unclear the need for the pedestrian crosswalk at the southwest corner of Retail B, since it does not appear to connect with any sidewalk to the south of this property. Advise/remove. 14. Sheet C2.1 - Dimension the width of the 90-degree parking spaces west of Retail B and southern portion of grocery store and the parking row along Belcher Road (appear to be nine-foot wide spaces). 15. Coordinate/show on Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 the column locations, covered walkways and overhangs indicated on the building site/floor plans (Sheets Al. 1, A2.1, A2.2), as to sidewalks and foundation landscape areas. 16. Unless already recorded (and, if so, provide a copy of the recorded document), need to record a cross-access easement with the eye clinic to the south and the mobile home park to the south prior to the issuance of the first Certificate.of Occupancy (condition of approval). 17. By Code provisions, only nine handicap parking spaces are required. Suggest reducing to the minimum required. Also, suggest relocating one of the nine required handicap spaces to the west of Retail B to provide more direct and closer handicap access to this retail space. 18. According to Urban Land Institute (ULI) standards and the range of required parking for retail sales, Staff would support a reduction of parking below five spaces per 1,000 sf to as low as four spaces per 1,000 sf (will need some type of a Parking Study justifying the reduction at least on the type of shopping center and types of use). This type of a neighborhood shopping center does not generate the need for five spaces per 1,000 sf (as a mall would) and a lower number of parking spaces would make greater use of, and promote a greater turnover of cars in, the provided parking. This also reduces the amount of impervious surface. Obviously, the location of spaces needs to reflect where needs are, but some of the outlying parking west of the grocery store may be able to be reduced/eliminated. 19. Sheet C1.1 - The aerial map is too dark to even see the site. Lighten up. 20. Sheet C2.1 - Dimension the width of the main driveway/drive aisle on the east side of the property (west of Lease Area #2) and as it enters the mobile home park to the south. 21. Unclear how Lease Area #1 is being serviced with water and sewer. Revise Sheet C3.1. 22. Parking lot design does not provide for shopping cart return corrals. Revise Sheet C2.1 to show the corrals. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 35 m parapet of 30 inches from the highest roof R k elevation. The 23 . Code permits a maximu0 I Planning Department has advertised a requested increase for the parapet for the grocery store of 10.17 feet (or 34.17 feet) above the roof deck at (24.0 feet). The parapet for Retail B is shown 12.5 feet above the highest roof deck (assumed to be 26 feet, since it is not indicated on "3 - Rear Elevation"; which is in conflict with the 24.0 feet indicated on "2 - Front Elevation"). Additionally, the parapet in the middle of Retail A is shown at 9.67 feet above the highest roof deck (assumed to be 20.0 feet, since it is not indicated on "4 - Rear Elevation"; which is in conflict with the 18.0 feet indicated on "2 - Front Elevation"). In all three instances, the parapet height is excessive and Staff will not support such a parapet height. No justification has been submitted for such parapet height. It appears that the proposed height is only to accommodate increased attached signage. Reduce the parapet height to something more reasonable, potentially in the five-to-six foot height (which is double or more than double the minimum). In concert with the reduction to the parapet height, the height of the hip-roofed structures should also be reduced proportionally. 24. Elevations - In "3 - Rear Elevation" there is a higher portion of the building in the center of the grocery store (greater than 34.17 feet) that is not reflected on "1 - Front Elevation". Revise. 25 . Elevations - "1 - Front Elevation" - It would seem that the center hip-roofed covered walkway for the grocery store would have greater importance than the two hip-roofed structures on the ends of the grocery store. Revise/advise. 26. Based on the elevations submitted, it appears the proposal has adequately screened from view the rooftop mechanical equipment. However, Section 3-201.1) requires the screening of mechanical equipment on all sides, including abutting properties. Need to address the rear of the shopping center. 27. Unclear what material the "awnings" are made of in the center of Retail A (Suites 105-107) and on the front of Suite 111. Indicate on plans. 28 . Code requires all on-site utilities be located underground. Based on a site inspection, there are some overhead lines along Gulf to Bay Blvd east of the existing main shopping center driveway that appears to only serve the subject property. Likewise there are overhead lines that run north to south behind the existing shopping center that also appears to serve the subject property only. It appears that these existing overhead lines can be removed. The removal of these overhead lines in both locations will be beneficial visually, as well as beneficial to the existing trees that the lines run through. Revise/advise. Other: No Comments Notes: Prior to issuance of a Development Order, submit five revised sets of application material addressing all DRC comments by June 5, 2006, or FLS will be void for failure to timely address DRC comments. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, January 5, 2006 - Page 36 A File Edit View Favorites Tools Help - a earch Favorites 'I tedia :- Baclc - -4 r Address M http • i f v.,lalv.. amazon, corn jgpj reader f 0874208289; ref=sib_dp_rit; 002-4255109-0036836#reader-page Gn Links " { Internet Start ?' { ?Inbox - Microsoft Outlook ®Tidemark Advantage ,_-j Windward Passage 279 H... ? -9 cAmazon com: Books: P... Fly) 1-= Ax 2;25 PM He Edit View Fa - ; Back Favorites a 'r ! . ® ? T r ^ • ?', ? w ? Address http:JJwww amazon.com) ?y gpireaderJO8742W289iref=sibdpj)t/002 4255109 6U36836*reader-page ' C,6 Key Recommendations i a kE 1 .tz I'f t FhWT jrti .. .i 1,,.E sn _ ..,. itf la tu+ll fit, a o,i5 to 9l rlAittli T - t ,t..? J-;: =. it 1,;,i ) ia, r. = bn.;"i, 1]J+.t7,1 i?t1 55 E)t4' I 5 d,l n`J4l°;J1T Ati. i L%ik ( .:? vt t t '1 ?.? )litT „+Kt?v px::i L n2 6F7 111 ?:l •tf iw n lt1"i?11 i•>t _ _ Etl i1?'ri+? =?? lair .e.k i. - .?a 5 'f';a)a'? tt1:3 ?. ,11 t(.f. ; ?, t , L •' :' 1•• 'ti if t?i'l }3?1 t4?tll Sa Li+tf .'ii riE ll t3t tcol mt lilt. . atilt t- StTm i ? & ?*. {if YTti Lana. Np4". .?ta`a'C 143+.1 tcn,f Y?E ', .i?fU3)t?.n t?3> Yi, S( i '? t .tl t ? 3 ` i 1 tt liel l t sf or the ?i*rt?l:rast rftrinlteK lit 4fkwr. e. ?, Efj tti rt4 4 i't ? s,?Aii[? tJl JI. 1. 'it { :. 1}tJt .i1fY.S l13( tt' Sf?;IFbT14 .k fm illtxw ?-rrtrrrn 011"uhl be &uf tats to +wx° Pr33,ett? ... +,nj.??,. „? 1+ rlaeign en tttitt?i ir+tit n,,-th11Ail11Y%- {ue6 a? Cm T1( t. Ali-A it"ritig ,ill I'm I" is-io ,+1 4W lilt-It that Je,*.t4lK-J m the tithan LAnJ i% 1910 ?sll ?71.f[k?h l'CSF it?f'+} l;0"n :clsm ?tl ?irE la st9tit{ thttl i.lmmr111anu, 1nt Ye 1t duting 1{t?(E1ut ? t 3 Jt?i ILY" vct?sta +xsulf , trY. St 1Ntl# ;1 ft?%{i??tts}. ai'stect I+ ?*elt 1t¢Yk 1IW1Ye???t fil _ 1T t 1(6? n}47lt l pAil mg -. laic 0111-tit, „f r-x, fl 4,st, K'htti}i an is 'rAlliitlg "v- that -so br tt%t%j tt, - ttuur mjivt3u:al Und uk•T ?3n 11th nthrr h.uu1, the .mrtv,nint 44, wpq.111,E lnan?3y;? J i. t;t R*ru* lwak setsC rwci Of ' ?i ,.,, lu ?C"% p?? =iA o N' b4 ",iltj; OA`tit?i o {1v"_ ttfg ilzt-, %tn'K. 1"ItiNri 1htFl littt WL iMIT (b7oth(,t ? t cm t1kwhM 1tt. I 1 ?t1rK.tCti ht- Ir1?C'T4 1]t tiF' l"s: hx ll' k t,, t3.41 SJt an, g7,'Kr% whets ?lltl. t1AC 4414 :/,tmlyoj aft tk;A %I lid% rho f9tti ettlk,l rhr smart the m.V%trl- +t ct That tix TW*hbrabrr«s! =d cC»ttrs the rt??+iarracn&j ?' PTt%trturh of tritauiam, cturetat. imimkd parkinr, t f"v, are AM444K c'a+?tilt#gai Y ? my too 4,. iim, A,?., 1fi^C% pit And kT t[T[ t3nFttCi1( blul U%v" fm , "trO, 3ti Glit.li t( tail ihlq% tKcu- ramj j - ?? ?Ir ,cm o nCT15:wlo fijvA.4 to the ', s1? ?C.'1.??. Ktt 1?1,"11"tt l,I th. ?1?.A I.Wl %purr fto Aft (flA pnnt&I ,. ?t s (ettcrt ? ?' ftiiTlYttiYi ,xt e'fe p6lu ,ofl Nrkiz>r 71t1tttCF alxt(slfit?? 1teA?i ?7r t+i sht .cntrr Tabto 4 W4KtWtmWft&*d P091049 Rail-* .-wfknalYltRS [&If M }of Thor "3fL&&N Wag. tv drtt`tt%wd «: ic, in thov rcjxRf - tt * W MIAnYllrsrM, { L+MiMt' "Ji1lM?' _ S 4rr#?+n Bart+t F . }1rS!'T'? +r54tk a`iry' t1?1GE 13°t CtSYi -4 ik A i 4 T} 4, d! I{P ?o 4 - . , 9977tt ?? ) f4;Lt itttillY S"g47.ifi rtF F3' si.tA?*+ `el.140 SWmr; 4?..S+f? x=15' T,il+1r 7 j11ak%, tltr aNaa,nila?rtitla?l mum, {f:,tt'FC2 "mlt---oej ri k•ei nl?t*?ilFitil' ??Fx 1r<r F ra+.Ni ?tlatr r11?btil?w+. -- >? l ltifr 1hr 1i31,Ti1 ltlcdSa i?t t1! .3j1#a. (li1iS . ^J. ? t i'i&, iw1tt111fE tiCnF151 GT: 11 trT ,t1 ?aa" - 4 7 j w 1 F1 age E `File Edit View f5r ToesHelp ;'' y 1 - i - ' .« r{ Search Back ?:,JFavWes ?&Meda 11. to a 9- L:EJ Address jg1 http://www amazori.comigp/reader/0874208289/ref sit dp_pt/OU2-4255109-0036836#re-ader-page " ,I,n ;JJiH11lLxf t1EC it Iff AS`ili.PW tint l lut ,,pr it ;stt+• ri'tt,rt, u.n.l.,ai.,e_. it, t, pcrltJ for tii .CniCt ?It ., 1h - Ir, 't ".i di Af tfit? lilt l'r1;131stnt?tta .trtsrl€sr c'an' tontainest in ihte f['p-f ;fit (, ?t +. Yf,.i't'. f,?lv 17.. illg trill:./ill dliflor, tit, ilc,tt:., v E j i.tid i,« l IUNYZ-rt, ?tU4e 44limtatd th.t atr Pit1111144t11) A,UI., +)c j'c 11,11 n!„ 441=h 11-W c AI l1i" OMlItI ii. tt'r) l,'+ the AVAii, ? (CAI PCS, ['#$. ttttllifniol 7p21k-in of 1"11,21 ti. A)41fs of 1,kirking l,arl itlry <1:3[k kt{ tt t y , : .tf`S1ftEL tilled tttka(1 + r 1110.) t,f 4.tt i? Y ?, 1, rt rzrr 1,{Kill rtpJUC tcrt 1tt?m rhr .AU jr At,uadill tv UWAl. - t I`U flt)ltt? l°uk.=' l'.ii .rll? it,!> t 1), %1,,°i$ ; Jn ahc? I `)?'{.tk ana t 7Rt?'s. 4ht;+? ua? ?t't?kittCftst'r![5 , f i tt :\-- III, ?Lt l: itl lA? " ?. x@' 15 tY yl i'i t? tt?'F.ny ). l lll?? i?C(t13S1i1 ?ii7 (]'1) C?1ttC c: ?kl':; ,s k3L t}i? lr tYi at ?7?s11?11 4i"i II?iT Wt Y. 4431 C''I t.l.,t.It li't 1t.. trkl c,tl H"rrl,t 'e?tiA t; tUtt?'? ttt"e 2iF Dl4tTtrpi tiM :almpr?.tslti}..;t'tt ail '1,_ +t.,tco m 17:; 1,i8tt P:f4mig Req :. ?:11.' I,!r:,t.rl,I 11 #4) .{M lW,'S >T'flt of the jft-T#:rril "I;iK tool pafkifll; it -jil l L: •Y?FJ.?rt r, ?r'f t??t'J?•j+3 rdp I.PnffrY, the - , .6'i, a'r? c?l.1N"ftlrte.rt '1A"'Jt Pllli l!1' PjW.: STFlY7 -- A ill .?. A 1111C.11 mtjt:13C fit tt.l}{ sitl t'1r°.-l:. tlSi'l:•C? l>rffa_?tl. l?,'3? tt K`h Y1l,I} !tl ,lL tl1tR{ itt?6tlfi" Sri,}+lix 4't'? 30 ?eJfi ,il?t +.f rc .'.«i+?ha+)llllCi ?bA7 tti l?xi rp,.N.t-, 1?rt i ?H'Fib fSI W>•i+L lrc4 t.K Rf ? . 6 ., " . l'K"! oti Ah+,ti 1tt PCftrA( *hin>_hi Pe ill, Junt}r, Ole PCA 7? -v mn c lJd sic ,.LP to ilmC 1lattiT mitk Would k c l'omPA+:Tf_ C613ti,d I'M InWA u;e. 3 1 )-sl?ltari- A ll?f(QAF iletfo tmsti in tilt,` I+Ark.t. l ltlw-cvtt..x.q ria.lrng to rfW NxfiCir l t:,>,rt ct-a ier m which muiaianit, antrr deound- Mworvert. ihn Athuunuttt 1`att; % Aclmt+twisl (h1fN) wi tdci .F 4,4offrK7it, ofmrrv -Po" `+7t*AMUI slltlwid be utrl4ml vvnh tAuttatt Nh"(V became inxiva%i lgiv laWt in the ,.r 14 paLcm of the ti" U A stmctltl" t attim with UmilmlIU161 tree PuLng 1990%. 1'his rrt-raj has xscl"neti '•5rltiitr 41k poking spairvx pct LWO t,ftt-}t hj*v diffmilty o,mploottl.1 t; filrrtt. ,s ith tht itictC4 vi) 'mlr. of F=Mit , F lquan keir, -4 empk y-1mtrk*ag, Utihiry whwks. ['he *vf!A!s Isar tte"t :•i; that drtoWi tm A% iat co -m wAs twt.,,t its ,vAi vd fm l"i. h tcawd dta aatdy 54) . a arr ., _dl;Wr .t Pathior. Sope y Root primm ea! vehfJrs rrn fhC macl wrrr , w'trl<t ";tl\r<+t (ittFPt4.t s 0 z ti la is irarpttrtam ib tlptatrtll}} its ?t3alkirn-j tompt,tct. L)ltstrONAPM Ar ( ? Fir,ar ,fret r,.r:r? ,1 ? ing rat" to Alrtrrminc the cwrcnt fwl- AtrkinA puWAbcd by UU1 provWr.* itah+ ug4gy A wriw% (,t pAA%ng wppsly ltntntital aw4o"411r SA6 >fata 6v i her ttxramr>KCfxW tai"o with a Adimg ratim was cak rid 9irr crnterj? wlch *ixc of vChkic_ 1 µ;1k. tiw ltariinjt rftw 4vomm im do Poking .WCUatulatsm coufzt>, taws cxl 1 - 41 the Jmllnitl?tti mbWr 4? CUgiPSLI €rrixr }gr r?txrnahl' Wuh the mnm: the number .ii }++.m % YP*X* j Cr JAM 4 -11% , _1 vfuAt# i (t.tit.W. but c*AnVlt'. a WA M ? k t, As %,m ml"abde 2, the PAA i?+»?, tt CIS"-i ?"-rsp-?l ?WI1f4ri9l" aA) 1 mtwlr-kAx L mrx atritll amauum meta- ittg supply cues icd Jc umd for gist[ pmk* CSC dcijp n tctvm [let&d fwnmmt, oxi onmu rhAl x Cntrttuttnng 0) pot?t-nn to ",4 the it" GLA *vmW raw 2 ? mlurrc 4.21 *pare* per LOW sqWr is $up* awl N ~A Raft " kW CW"*n w!';!s car CO ice, t6ll wA) lviwr as dw 4OD4W mod ?. - ?r 5V4.`?,M),syctatt: fiaW t?A"Ma. _. t iHN rt 1i 1 1/Il ?t ? N F0 :? - 't.>!tF/M N41q :?t31rt1?nlt i? 1(4lp?l?lArMti '?rN?? t7MiSM r ucnces pak- ate, -'rte ?L 1z 116 it O I he In thtki (J trier hnfi f o1j; <lrptrrt,l .it i, ar,lrrr: GAtlp":lem Cm fYW,tX)n ;,499 -99 fif, 516 45 t tilt,-imt"rE N htl Armr h% tltt?Ilt% tjt ,,,Y1,wxA ? v*,oott cl A 1 ?S rr.,,t,.;^,;t,1?, 1 ;Jthcr thilD 1lMOC l341- T&W , - -i, -: :..1„,. iw .J1,m*ot t for park.etl. r•..._•?.w? . y A L} tit I j ?x muosoft va?+tege ?t4+irtdward ?saoe.2?9 l+l.. ; von: Books: P.- • • Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:23 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLS2005-12098 - 501 S Belcher Wayne, The proposed 10' easement along the east side of Lease Area #2 is a drainage and utility easement. It connects and provides continuity with an existing easement along the south and -2/3 of the east property line. The easement is not for a current, specific purpose. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com 1 9 • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:34 PM To: 'Brinson, Ryan' Cc: Schodtler, John Subject: RE: Supplemental Recommendation Follow up [Wells, Wayne] See additional comments below. -----Original Message----- From: Brinson, Ryan [mailto:rbrinson@co.pinellas.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:08 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Supplemental Recommendation Follow up Thanks Wayne! Two more questions: 1) Could you please have John S. call me at (464-8250)? 1 can't reach him, been trying! 2) On case # 05-25 (below) did the site plan address our recommendation? From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:52 PM To: Brinson, Ryan Subject: RE: Supplemental Recommendation Follow up Ryan - See the responses below. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Brinson, Ryan [mailto:rbrinson@co.pinellas.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:26 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Supplemental Recommendation Follow up Wayne, Below are the cases we talk about on the phone. Do you mind researching them for me to find out the status on these amendments? I am trying to finish the report by tomorrow so the sooner the better, if you don't mind. Your help with this matter is greatly appreciated. Thanks again, Ryan 12/29/2005 • 0 Page 2 of 2 • Case #CW 04-9 (Vacant Mobile Home Park) - 1.3 acres located south side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, approximately 850 feet east of Belcher Road, amended from Residential Low Medium to Commercial General. Supplemental Recommendations: 1) That the City limit traffic impacts and intensity of the use on the site pursuant to their Concurrency Management System; and 2) that they require cross-access between the subject site and adjacent commercial general uses to ameliorate traffic impacts. Follow Up: [Wells, Wayne] This vacant mobile home park area is being incorporated into a much larger site. A Flexible Standard application has been submitted for the overall site of 10.5696 acres and is scheduled for review by our Development Review Committee (DRC) on January 5, 2006 (Case No. FLS2005-12098). This overall site includes the area subject to CW 04-9, the former Fred Flemings BBQ restaurant site (already demolished), the shopping center generally at the southeast corner of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Belcher Road (which includes the Publix grocery store) and the former automotive repair facility directly at the southeast corner of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Belcher Road (already demolished). The overall site is proposed to be redeveloped with a shopping center of 87,500 square feet. Access to this overall shopping center is being restricted to two driveways each on both Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Belcher Road. The proposal includes continued cross-access to the eye clinic to the south of the shopping center and to the mobile home park south of the subject area under CW 04-9. After the DRC review and the resubmittal of revisions to the site plan and application materials, I would anticipate the approval of a Development Order for this application. After such, I would anticipate the submission of appropriate site and building permits to construct the proposed shopping center. Case #CW 05-25 (Vacant lot) - 0.2 acres located at 2723 S.R. 580, approximately 250' southwest of Charles Avenue, amended from Residential Urban to Residential/Office General. Supplemental Recommendations: 1) That the City give special consideration to the improvements of the site with respect with the buffering and landscaping guidelines of the Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridor Master Plan; and 2) that the City give consideration to traffic circulation patterns and access regarding the adjacent school. Follow Up: [Wells, Wayne] The subject site was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on March 22, 2005, to permit the development of the lot for an office use (Case No. FLD2004-11082). A two-story office building is currently being constructed on the property (Building Permit #BCP2005-05761). [Wells, Wayne] The site plan approved under FLD2004-11082 provided the required 15-foot landscape buffer along the front of the property, meeting the landscaping material requirements of our Code. As for traffic circulation and access, the site is only 60 feet in width and was approved with a 24-foot wide driveway. 12/29/2005 • • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 5:09 PM To: 'Susan Muller' Cc: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLS2005-12098, Gulf to Bay Plaza Ms. Muller - The site plan submitted indicates a sidewalk access from your condominium complex to the redesigned shopping center, with a sidewalk along the south side of the shopping center to allow safe pedestrian access from your complex, as well as the mobile home park to the east of your condominium complex, to the shopping center. Since I have not been out to the site yet and their survey does not indicate the exact location of the gate, I only assume that the proposed sidewalk being shown is located at the existing gate location. The site plan does not show any fence or wall existing or planned along the common property between your condominium complex or the mobile home park. Preliminary discussions in my office and with the developer is that a wall (six-foot high masonry) should be constructed along the common property line of your condominium complex and the mobile home park, with gates to allow continued pedestrian access to the shopping center. As a point of information, Publix will be moving approximately 150 feet north of its present location, closer to Gulf to Bay Boulevard. A large retail tenant space is planned on the south side of Publix (north of your complex). The driveway from Belcher Road (at the traffic light) and its access to the rear of the shopping center is proposed to be maintained in its present location. This case is scheduled for review by the Development Review Committee on January 5, 2006. Should you have any other questions or concerns, please let me know. Merry Christmas!! Wayne Wells (727) 562-4504 -----Original Message----- From: Susan Muller [mailto:skisusan@optonline.net] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 10:58 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Mr. Wells, I own a condo in the Druid Oaks Complex, just south of the Publix that is on the corner of Gulf-to-Bay & Belcher. I live in New York & will be unable to attend the meeting on January 5, 2006. 1 understand that there are going to be some changes made to this Publix store and just wanted to be sure that our gate, that allows entry to the south side of the Publix store, will not be removed. Also, is Publix going to put up some sort of new fence between 12/22/2005 Page 2 of 2 Publix & the Druid Oaks Complex. Thank you for your time, for sending the notice of December 9, 2005 and thanking you in advance for your response to this note. Susan Muller 12/22/2005 0 • Wells, Wayne From: Elbo, Bennett Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 11:48 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Subject: FLS2005-2005-12098 Gulf to Bay Plaza - Traffic Impact Analysis Wayne, Please note the above application as complete. I've just received the Traffic Impact Analysis (2 books and 1 CD) in time for my review. Thanks Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Traffic Operations Division Phone: (727)562-4775 Fax: (727)562-4755 bennett.elbo@myclearwater.com 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Garriott, Kevin Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 8:19 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Fox, MaryJo Subject: FW: Publix Plaza fyi -- this project was at BPRC this past week. -----Original Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 4:58 PM To: Garriott, Kevin Subject: RE: Publix Plaza Please see Settlement Agreement attached in FYI to Agenda Item 1653. Final language re that particular bb and whether it will be the first to comply is still being worked on. It may be down in around a year. Will have further details by next Thurs. nite when CC will consider agreement. -----Original Message----- From: Garriott, Kevin Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 10:09 AM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: Publix Plaza The owners, architects, and engineers for the GTB Plaza at GTB and Belcher were in yesterday. They are showing us their plans for complete demo and reconstruction. There is a billboard on that property. They remembered that the timeframe for that to be removed was possibly stipulated in the settlement. Do you have any info on that and when that may be if so stipulated? Thanks. 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:32 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Wielecki, Karl Cc: Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: project question I think the appropriate thing would be for Wayne to call the citizen since he has the most knowledge on the case. Thanks Wayne. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727) 562-4547 cyndi.tarapani@tnyclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 5:46 PM To: Wielecki, Karl Cc: Planning Subject: RE: project question Karl - This is a project that has not yet been submitted but representatives from Northside Engineering, along with owners, realtors, etc., came to the BPRC meeting on February 2, 2005, to discuss rebuilding the shopping center basically at the southeast corner of Belcher Road and Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Eckerd has vacated their unit (as they have been bought out by CVS), which leaves a big void on the north side of the shopping center. Their proposal is to retain Publix as the main tenant and relocate them to the north side of the shopping center. The shopping center property would be enlarged to include the old Fred Flemings BBQ restaurant parcel and the northern portion of the mobile home park (to the east and south of Fred Flemings) that has been rezoned to commercial. The shopping center would be redesigned into an "L"-shaped building (with Publix at the corner of the "L"), with tenant spaces facing Gulf to Bay Boulevard, as well as facing Belcher Road as they presently do. They were advised that signage, including the existing billboard, will need to be brought into compliance with Code provisions. Hope this answers the question. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Wielecki, Karl Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 10:54 AM To: Planning Cc: Rubley, Alissa Subject: project question A Dr. Toskcia (797-7806) called to ask what is going on across the street from 2260 GtB. Anyone familiar with this? Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 727-562-4553 karl.wielecki@myclearwater.com PlAellas County Property Ap er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 Page 2 of 5 18 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 320 / 0300 02-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:07:36 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and. Sales ELLIS & CO LTD OBK: 14109 OPG: 1535 PO BOX 1879 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688-1879 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 254.04 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 2 /2,005 14A 09/i,535 950,000 {Q} I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 583,700 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 583,700 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 583,700 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 13,563.55 1} 145 x 160 14.00 23,200.00 S Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 13, 563.55 6} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 13, 563.55 Short Legal W 145FT OF S 16OFT OF N 21OFT OF E 620FT(S) OF NW Description 1/4 OF SW 1/4 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 11 Niellas County Property Ap0er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 18 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 320 / 0300 Page 3 of 5 02-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:07:36 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 Va-_an-t Extra Fa?ur?es Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*- I Fv* T F *`11 m-N F "'7?1 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 Pinellas County Property Aper Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 Page 4 of 5 ref 0 2 246 E R 2260 I ` G L J ? ?J r--• ? ? u- T 0 r LID LO , CS} fSJ ?IWSI 1?? Cc. IiitS'} 3 IItS) o GO 4x9.89 32/05 2?? 34 c (c) IELCHER Rd - T 0 - BAY L AZA r- r- r= 145 1 158(S) 1 150 0 321 +3 c€: 275 ? ? m e2 nJ cu ?,? 145 32121- Ac(c) 299,16 15a 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 Pinellas County Property ApWer Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 n>F Page 5 of 5 It s M 'Al ,: omp ) ? ? e a. 5 1 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.usihtbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 Pinbllas County Property Ap er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 Page 2 of 5 18 / 29 / 10 / 00000 /-320 / 0400 02-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:06:52 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales ELLIS CO LTD OBK: 05672 OPG: 0642 PO BOX 1879 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688-1879 EVAC: Nan-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 254.04 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 12/1,983 5,672/ 642 2,700,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,974 4,136/ 483 550,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,970 3,3331 634 222,540 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 425,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 425,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 425,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 9,875.81 1) 144 x 150 18.00 21, 300.02 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 9,875.81 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 9,875.81 Short Legal FROM NW CDR OF SW 1/4 TH E 180FT TH S 50FT FOR POB TH Description S 15OFT TH W 144FT TH N 125FT TH H45DE 35.2FT TH E Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 V Pinbllas County Property Ap er Information: 1.8 29 16 00000 320 18 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 820 / 0400 Page 3 of 5 02-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 16:06:52 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 Vacant Extra F ? at ur e s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 Pin6llas County Property Ap er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 Page 4 of 5 106 12 15 ,::: ? [ ?j I / / 12SfS1 469.8 u=, 32401 cf iIJ LO N A 32/05 8, `- ?Ac1 ) BELL HER r RD GULF - TO - BAY PLAZA TO 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.usihtbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 Page 5 of 5 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 Page 2 of 7 18 / 20 / 10 / 00000 / 320 / 0500 02-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:05:20 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales ELLIS CO LTD OBK: 05672 OPG: 0642 PO BOX 1879 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688-1879 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 523 S B ELCHER RD of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 254.04 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price {Qual/UnQ} Vac/Imp Plat Information 12/1,983 5,672/ 642 2,700,000 {M} I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,978 4,645/1,832 1,269,300 {0} I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,970 3,333/ 634 222,540 {Q} I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 6,100,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 6,100,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 6,100,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 141,746.92 1} 0 x 0 7. 50 357, 396. 0 S Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 141, 746.92 6} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 141,746.92 Short Legal FROM NW CDR OF SW 1/4 TH E 180FT TH S 50FT FOR POB TH Description E 469.89FT TH S 617.77FT TH U 613.94FT TH N 467.77 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 12/2/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap0er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 * Page 3 of 7 Property and Land Use Code descriptions Building- 1 . Building 2 . Building 3 Building #1 18 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 320 / 0500 :01 02-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:05:20 Commercial Card 01 of 3 Improvement Type: Shopping Center Property Address: 523 S BELCHER RD Prop Use: 324 Land Use: 11 S?ruc-tural Elements Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 14 Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Bar Joist/Rigid Fram Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Uinyl Asbestos Tile Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 10 Bath Tile Floor Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,963 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 13,700 7) .00 0 2) Utility .55 1,290 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .30 1,200 9) .00 0 4) Carport .30 783 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra F?atur?s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 240102 1.50 240,102 360,150 360,150 999 2) BK WINDOW 10,000.00 1 10,000 9,000 1,998 3) FIRESPRINK 1.75 14,990 26,230 17,310 1,985 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 386,460 Building #2 http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 12/2/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap0er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 0 Page 4 of 7 18 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 320 / 0500 :02 02-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:05:22 Commercial Card 02 of 3 Improvement Type: Shopping Center Property Address: 511 S BELCHER RD Prop Use: 324 Land Use: 11 Structural E1?m?nts Foundation Spread/Hono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof.Frame Bar Joist/Rigid Fran Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 16 Bath Tile Hone Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,964 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 11,700 7) .00 0 2) Utility .55 48 8) .00 0 3) Canopy .25 1,800 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 CC3mmE3rCla1 Extra Fcaturs Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #3 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &i=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 12/2/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap0er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 Page 5 of 7 13 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 320 / 0500 :03 02-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:05:22 Commercial Card 03 of 3 Improvement Type: Supermarket Property Address: 525 S BELCHER RD Prop Use: 324 Land Use: 11 Structural E1?m?nts Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 16 Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Bar Joist/Rigid Fram Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Uinyl Asbestos Tile Interior Finish Paneling Average Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 12 Bath Tile Floor Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,963 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Ar E3as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 53,520 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 820 8) .00 0 3) Loading Platform .50 140 9) .00 0 4) Canopy .25 140 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) LOFT 21X35 15.00 735 11,030 7,060 1,985 2) FIRESPRINK 53520 1.75 53,520 93,660 59,940 1,985 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 67,000 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*? ® Fil Tr M http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 12/2/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap*er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 46989 ?La l73 wc?C1 0 144 z1 32/0" 8-2s$3,6, ctc,) EELLIER GULF - TO - BAY PLAZA 613.94 Page 6 of 7 0 L 32/03 145 +yj 0 P- P- DRVI •` v- DRU (-6EL?gfR I 601 Ra 2250 ???5D . "b DRRDID I-IAPI- 1/8 Mile. Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 12/2/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap*er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 * Page 7 of 7 Back to Search. Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=l &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 12/2/2005 P..rnellas County Property Ap er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 Page 2 of 5 13 l 29 I 10 / 00000 / 320 I 1210 02-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:08:15 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales ELLIS & CO LTD OBK: 14109 OPG: 1589 PO BOX 1879 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688-1879 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: .00 2003 2004 - : sales from 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 2 /2,005 14,10911,589 1,000,000 (Q) U 0000: Book Pgs - 8 /2,004 13,749/1,054 500,000 (Q) U 0000: Book Pgs - 8 /2,004 13,749/1,056 87,500 (U) U oooo: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 559,800 Homestead: NO Ownership .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 559,800 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 559,800 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 13,008.18 1) 0 x 0 12. 00 54,885. 60 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 13, 008.18 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 13, 008.18 Short Legal U 153FT{S} OF S 263FT(S) OF N 313FT(S) OF E 475FT Description & U 145FT OF S 102.iFT OF H 313FT OF E 620FT{S} OF Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 %nellas County Property Ap*er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 18 / 29 / 10 / 00000 / 320 / 1210 Page 3 of 5 02-Dec-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 16:08:15 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 VacariT ExTra F?atur?s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) [*-] [41 Fil F+ I ON' PJ http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 a;inellas County Property Ap0er Information: 18 29 16 00000 320 * Page 4 of 5 _ (? ???1? c c, 9 9 L R 2260 W F I 2' 8? L F G ?lq cc 's I , c%j S (IJ ? r, { G4-k-F ,J) TO t?E c_?1 in f tG O IN) 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 r %kinellas County Property Ap0er Information: 18 29 1.6 00000 320 Page 5 of 5 A F ?40 S ? g v ?Wv ? r: ? vw S `? ??°3w TEA. e Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 12/2/2005 ? ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATE'R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW December 9, 2005 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 501- 525 S BELCHER RD (FLS2005-12098) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 501 - 525 S BELCHER RD, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for (1) Flexible Standard Development approval to permit retail sales and services in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height of an additional 12.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck - roof deck at 24-foot height) and an additional 14.17 feet for architectural embellishments, under the provisions of Section 2-703.R; and (2) vacation of a 10-foot wide utility easement. On January 5, 2006, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be January 5, 2006. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at (727) 562-4504 or via email at wayne.wells@Myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case, which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on January 5, 2006. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wayn Wells, AICP Planner III FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIIMEMBER HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCIIMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETFRSEN, COUNCII-NIEM131-R "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" ELLIS & CO LTD PO BOX 1879 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 1879 HAPPY TRAILS MOBILE HOME PARK 370 E MAPLE RD 3RD FL BIRMINGHAM MI 48009 - 6303 FISHER, DORIS 2250 DRUID RD E # 4C CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4931 NICHOLS, RUTH A 2250 DRUID RD N # 5-B CLEARWATER FL 33764 - TOUGAS, ROLAND E TOUGAS, FLORENCE M 2250 DRUID RD # 602 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4963 DOUGLASS, CHARLES W DOUGLASS, KAY W 2250 DRUID RD E # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4963 Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Doug Williams PO Box 8204 Clearwater, F133758 ELLIS CO LTD PO BOX 1879 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 1879 PERRINE, LOUIS A PERRINE, LAUREEN 1515 16TH PL KENOSHA WI 53140 - 1517 BOWDITCH, SHERRI A 2250 DRUID RD # 41) CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4931 FRYE, VERNON G FRYE, ONALINE C 82115 B ST PINELLAS PARK FL 33781 - 1733 WEINZETL, THOMAS 1730 E SYLVAN AVE APPLETON WI 54915 - 4408 TURNER, JERALD B THE TURNER, MARY H THE 2281 MINNEOLA RD CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4965 ELLIS CO LTD PO BOX 1879 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 1879 MULLER, SUSAN SHANNON, JENNIFER 633 VETERANS HWY SMITHTOWN NY 11787 - 4309 NORCIA, MICHAEL A 2250 DRUID RD E # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4963 HOWE, KATHARINE S 2250 DRUID RD E # 601 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4963 DOUGLASS, C WILLIAM DOUGLASS, KAY W 2250 DRUID RD E #605 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4963 AMSOUTH BANK FLORIDA 3000 GALLERIA. TOWER STE 1600 BIRMINGHAM AL 35244 - 2372 525 Belcher Rd FLS2005-12098 Wayne Wells No Associations C r r ? c A ? l CITY OAgr-? C T LF ® gp-?'R??/r®Aryp-g?E y?-{? LA VV 1, It PLANNING DEPAR,rMEN"I' °6?AT?R{Cti,? Posr OrrrcT Box 4748, ClenKwn"rraz, FLORIDA 33758-4748 V o MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 Sound Mvirrlr: Avi:NUf., CLEARWATER, FLOR[nn 33756 TELEPHONE, (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RAGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT Rrvrr:W September 1, 2006 Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order for Case No. FLS2005-12098 501 - 525 South Belcher Road Dear Ms. Williams: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On January 5, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for (1) Flexible Standard Development approval to permit retail sales and services in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height of an additional 7.67 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck - roof deck at 24-foot height) and an additional 14.17 feet for architectural embellishments, under the provisions of Section 2-703.R; (2) vacation of a 10-foot wide utility easement; and (3) the reduction to interior landscaping from 10 to nine percent of the vehicular use area, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Retail Sales and Services criteria under the provisions of Section 2- 703,R; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the vacation of the 10-foot wide utility easement be approved by City Council; I R.\'\K I liiM4. w), ;Nl.\l()I: liu.i. Ic,, u,x. (;rn n \n[>iiM:r CAkI r.N A. PI rr.K,,EN, Cu[ xcii_\nnusrr, 'T(w;V. I•:.mi'l. mmi'm A NH AFFIRNInIT' A( [1ON . September 1, 2006 Williams - Page 2 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records, with a copy of the recorded document submitted to the Planning Department. 4. That Lease Areas #1 and #2 meet all Code requirements, including, but not limited to, FAR, ISR, parking, loading, traffic circulation, landscaping, dumpster access, etc.; 5. That a Comprehensive Sign Program be approved for the entire shopping center, including Lease Areas #1 and #2; 6. That all on-site utilities be underground, with the exception of the overhead lines along the south property line to the south of Retail A; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the location of parking lot lighting meet Code and be coordinated with site landscaping to avoid shielding of lighting by existing or future tree canopy; 8. That, prior to the issuance of building permits, screening of mechanical equipment be shown on plans; 9. That, prior to the issuance of building permits, dumpster enclosures be constructed of the same materials, and painted the same, as the building; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, plans be revised to remove the "RIBBON" tree barricade detail; 11. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant obtain a FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the State right-of-way and a Pinellas County permit for work in County right- of-way; 12. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a letter from FDOT be submitted indicating closing of the median opening on Gulf to Bay Boulevard nearest Belcher Road north of this property is not necessary; and 13. That any future compactor dumpster units be approved by the Director of Solid Waste prior to their installation. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above three conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received August 16 and August 30, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (September 1, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. A I r September 1, 2006 Williams - Page 3 In addition, in accordance with Section 4-502.A, please be aware that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by the applicant or a property owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The Community Development Board (CDB) would hear an appeal application. The appeal period for your case will expire on September 8, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727- 562-4504. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, ?MicZeleel?k?, AI?P`-? Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFlex Standard (FLS)Vnactive or Finished CaseslBelcher 501-525 Gul/to Bay Plaza (C) - ApprovedlBelcher 501-525 FLS2005-12098 Development Order. doc at C'Icarwatcr, 1'lorida I tll - ?arA ¦ ¦ 7? .'%M . PROPERTY GROUP !? r c i i IL e c l is xa. n ra c .r ri ?? c s i {? ri c r Interactive Cream SW# 6113 Snowbound SW# 7004 Colonial Yellow SW# 0030 Roycroft Copper Red SW# ?839 Split Face Block Terra Cotta Jet Black Sunbrella Silver Pac-Clad Roofing 0 36 - R00 --?37 1.0. • • / \ VVtJI I'LI'VHIIUIV uV FlN FL n NORTH ELEVATION n) "??n"w?? I i 4 SOUTH ELEVATION 3/71.1'-IE ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 212006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER O2 f PRECAST CONCRETE BIALNOSE CART RAB. NOT USED CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT O$ ALUMINUM LOUVER (CLEAR ANODIZED) © DECORATIVE FABRIC AWNING ON ALUMN. FRAME O DECORATIVE WALL LIGHTING ® SIDEWALK. SEE SHEET A8.1. Q9 F LF.S CROWN MOULDING KEYED NOTES T L CORRUGATED META SIDING I9 © STAINLESS STEEL SCUPPER & (MUCH COLOR WITH SPLIT FILE BLOCK) O DOWNSPOUT LINKED TO SEWER SYSTEM. CONTROL JOINT ®PU810f COMPACTOR CHUTE ® CEMENT PIASTER WITH OFS ACRfUC FINISH COAT (SAND PALMED TO MATCH CENTER/AC WALL MECHANICAL FINISH) OR INTEGRALLY COLORED CMW WITH STRUCK JOINT ® ATM MACHINE AND PRESTO SIGN © AT REAR (EAS) WALL AND EXPOSED SOUTH WALL 31C 45 CONTROL JOINT 9 4'-d D.C. SET ® 8'«6.49' ALUM RAIN HDOD DETAIL II/A6.3 1® STAINLESS STEEL ROOF OVERFLOW SCUPPER © EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM DECORATIVE BRACKET WITH OFS FINISH 36'-td ROOF APq 3o'-d T.D. MasoMEY "/ , > a u 4 KEY PLM • NORTH ELEVATION 3/3Y=t'-O ROOF APIX . I4'-6 " METAL TRUSS BRG. 20'-If T.O. MAS. PAJtWET . IB'-O ROOF JOIST MG. (0 NORTH WALL) 55 NORTHWEST ELEVATION J 3/3Y=1'-O • T?O IIIS pNVRi ROOF J06T BRC. (LOW PON]) A 3Y-4 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 211006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4 EAST ELEVATION 3/3Y=,'-O' 01 4'XB'rw GRWEO SPLIT FACE CMU PAINTED HOLLOW METAL ODOR ALUMINUM ROOF OVERFLOW SCUPPER V { PRECAST CONCRETE BULENOSE CART RAIL 1o CORRUGATED METAL SIDING Q FOAM DECORATIVE C(PAUIED POLYSTYRENE Q3 NOT USED © ALUMINUM SCUPPER R DOWNSPOUT, ? BRACKET RASIED E.I.F.S. BAND ® CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT © CONTROL JONI ?5 CONTINUOUS CONCRETE CURB O © ALUMINUM LWOER (CLEAR ANODIZED) DECORATIVE FABRIC AWNING ON AIllMN. FRAME ® CEMENT PLSFER WITH EDS ACRYLIC FlNISH COAT (SAND FINISH) OR INTEGRALLY COLORED CMU WITH STRUCK ® 8'xTx4B' ALUM RAIN HOOD Oj DECORATIVE WALL LIGHONG JOINTS AT RENT (EAST) WALL AND EXPOSED SOUTH WALL ® 09 SIDEYUIR, SEE SHEET AR.1. EIF.S CROWN MOULDING Q 11i 4S CONTROL JOINTS 0 4'-0' O.C SEE DETAIL 5/A6.4 KEYED NOTES Y PJ I I qy a& KEY PLAN 2 50UTN ELEVATION 3/3r=r-o' 3 WEST ELEVATION 3/3r=,'-0' 26'-P T.O. MASONRY (0 SOUTH WALL) 24'- 7.0. NlSONRf (0 FIST WALL) 20'-5 ROOF JOIST BRG. (LOW PF.) A 0'-5 FlN DOWNSPOUTS SEE DETAIL 14/A6.2 1 EAST ELEVATION 3/32'=I'-5 3 SOUTH ELEVATION 3/32'=1'-O' 26'-0' T.D. MA& PARAPET . 24'-C' ROOF JOIST 8RG (HIGH PT.) , b D- FlN. !,- ORIGINAL RECEIVED AL 21200B PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER O (%5:16 GROVFD SPLIT FACE CMU 10 PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR 16 ALUMINUM ROOF OVERFLOW SCUPPER 4 PRECAST CONCRETE BUWIOSE CARE RAIL 11 CORRUGATED METAL SIDING © DECORATIVE OLYSTYRENE EXPANDED P O 3/4' COMM JOINTS SEE DETAIL 6/A6.3 1© ALUMINIUM SCUPPER d DOWNSPOUT. WITH EIFS FINISH RASIED EI.F.S BAND ® CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 1© CONTROL JOIN CONTINUOUS CONCRETE CURB O ALUMINUM LOUVER (CLEAR ANODIZED) 14 CEMENT P su W RN MNN COAT (SAND FINISH) R ® 5 8' 45 ALUM RUN MOD © DECORATIVE FABRIC AWNING ON ALUMN. FRAME INIEGf y COLORED CMU WITH STRUCK ? a O DECORATIVE WALL LIMING JOIIS AT REAR (EAST) WAIL AND F)IPOSED SOUTH WALL © SIDEWALK SEE SHEET A&I. Q 31f 45 CONTROL. JOINTS 0 4'-5 0 E.I.F.S. CROWN MOULDING D.C. SEE DETAIL S/A6.4 a c c x ? a 4 1 06 1 2 WEST ELEVATION 3/32'=1'-d