Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLS2005-11087
f FLS2005-11087 715 S FT HARRISON AVE Date Received: 11/02/2005 AMSOUTH BANK ZONING DISTRICT: D LAND USE: CBD ATLAS PAGE: 295B PLANNER OF RECORD: R -T ORIGINAL RECENED DEC 2 S 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CLWCoverSheet INTERPLAN LLC 0 0 Section D. Written Submittal Requirements: The proposed development complements the recently completed block to the north of the site consistent of a South Trust bank, sub shop, small retail shops and a Publix Supermarket through the rhythm of buildings, parking and design. The side of the site on Druid remains in character and scale with the next two office buildings both setback from the street and behind parking with a frontage of landscaping. 2. The proposed site will not hinder or discourage development of the adjacent land. This is accomplished through the redevelopment of the parcel and construction the proposed AmSouth Bank incorporating the elements of the City of Clearwater's Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The proposed project will emphasize the desired vision of the City and aide in the redevelopment of the Downtown District. 3. The proposed development has been designed in accordance to life safety practices to ensure the health and safety of those in residence/employment in the surrounding neighborhood. 4. The proposed development has been designed to minimize traffic congestion on Ft. Harrison Avenue by removing two (2) existing curb cuts, as well as removing previously proposed curb cut. In addition, the layout of the site has also been designed to control the direction and flow of traffic minimizing internal traffic conflicts. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development in that its use is complimentary to the surrounding uses of retail and commercial as well as enhancing the urban character of Downtown. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties in that the proposed development is a commercial bank that holds regular banking hours and has been visually designed to be in harmony with the Downtown design criteria. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 0 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorianclo.com 0 ra 1wt. u- Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-5624865 V SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folld-ed sets of site plans If( SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 4* . 00 0 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 12/30/2004) - PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT - A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Ad SOV7?V' 8!Ae- MAILING ADDRESS: 3000 674U45'?4 -7y-LW, OI7V- pp0? PHONE NUMBER: 4?.Os ?7-?q- 2-W FAX NUMBER: ZDS ??/ ZSZ/ PROPERTY OWNER(S): C,t-'-rGo2Y / • /7?1 ???5 ` (//GF T `SlDeAJ7' - T/C-S (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: .51761 we"" 0 L& ?^ yf4woG'L leco MAILING ADDRESS: &-G led"V'b 1: l2ST F2.0eme- Q PHONE NUMBER: Ap7- ?o'-r 910101 FAX NUMBER: 407- CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: /OB?O i.JT Pl?9??D C441 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: / t .T- r:&4-r , &VaO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: /n2e9ezMCF SHEET 0 5; (if not listed here please to the to ti8n of this documen n the submittal PARCEL NUMBER: ?(O?Z S/ /'V6Z20 4 00 5I/ 0O/' PARCEL SIZE: Z • 7 7 AC1241?S (acres, square feet) /? ?I d- - PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): '407-soaw c4Rn/K 1 ?-511400 $t' Z - S'?b?21? Oy/G?D1nl? (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) /Vif;w Co.JS72yc7-io,J o? i4 Z- sTo.ey, /S71000 -C,4 J090Mr >?'ooT &-c-00-rN tgWnA-- L-)17H 150-1ve-7-Wa G*06 S , .7A7-A? 4.AA1E- ?4A tP ASSOCi,4TE.d SI7g wo2/c Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater • 9 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PRE USLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES - NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) R' SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Ir Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 1604SR UK A7-7-W- 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. PL~ See- 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. PlIF-4Se set 147`IT4CffE?A 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. JPLIOWSE S&- 47rolc64CFAb- 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. 10LePgSlF S,,.6- LoI Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: -1 FIB l-0014T 0,C -11415 &V/LD /n16j k)g S 1A1CR&?n1lFb "Ty jE,->6V4FLPP' 7/-&-:- Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater s • E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with 1 City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. I/ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; i Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; i All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Er Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included provided. Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 5624750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) lH? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; l9? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; W LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; W GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) e SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): / All dimensions; North arrow; / Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; / Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; i Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; % Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; i All required setbacks; / All existing and proposed points of access; % All required sight triangles; / Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater _i Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; 1 Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _Z Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; i Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); / Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. 12" SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; / Number of EXISTING dwelling units; J Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; o Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; ? Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and ./ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. V REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; M FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: ? One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; ? Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ? All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _J Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); ? Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) Gi` . LANDSCAPE PLAN: / All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _/ Sight visibility triangles; -/' Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; .oO' Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); ? Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; ./ Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; ./ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); ./ Irrigation notes. U( REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/3 X 11) (color rendering if possible); 55"' IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater 9 • 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. 5( BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 '/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. le--Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. StgnStufe of propeVowner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OFafMEr? S rn to- nand subscribed before me this a/ day of A.D. 200 to me and/or by who is Bona has produced as My K. AUSTIN EXPIRES: May 26, 2006 Bonded Thru Notary Public Undonwrlters Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater :#: 2004246339 BK: 13646 PG: 20 *'0.00 06/17/2004 at 12:22 PM, RECD ING 44.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $ KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER,RK 114ELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CL CLKDM02 a: PREPARED BY AND REfiiJIN TO: HARRY S. CLINE, Egiiire Macfarlane Fergu'son.%& McMullen 625 Court Street, Suite 200 Post Office Bp?c'1,669 (33757) Clearwater,;.'F1#.ida 33756 it ? 1, ti .v WARRANTY DEED IS INDENTURE made this 4th day of June, 2004, between <b*ITT CAR LEASING, INC., a corporation existing under the laws he State of Florida, having its principal place of business in "'•? he County of Pinellas, State of Florida, Party of the First Part, whose mailing address is 25191 U.S. Highway 19 North, Clearwater, FL 33763, and AMSOUTH BANK, an Alabama State Banking Corporation, of the County of Jefferson, in the State of Alabama, Party of the Second Part, whose mailing address is 3000 Galleria Tower, Suite 1600, Birmingham, AL 35244, Attn: Properties Department. W I T N E S S E T H: That the said Party of the First Part, for and in considera- tion of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to it in hand paid by the said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of the Second Part, forever, the following described land, situate lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to- wit. SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY REFERENCE. THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE SUBJECT TO THE EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. And the said Party of the First Part does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. 'INELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 13646 PG 2041 i4 ;v t IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Part has caused these presents to be signed in its name by its President, and its corpoxa2e seal to be affixed, the day and year above written. Signed.;`;,Yaealed and Delivered DIMMITT CAR LEASING, INC., in 0ur',Pr6sepqe: a Florida corporation By : SEAL ) r3 n " Na a hvd 1 8°h LARRY DI1iITT, JR. President rint Name VATN jae?,J IL 0VRzW (CORPORATE SEAL) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that before me personally appeared LARRY H. DIMMITT, JR., as President, of DIMMITT CAR LEASING, INC., a Florida corporation, to me personally known or who has produced as identification and known to me to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instru- ment, and severally acknowledged the execution thereof to be their free act and deed as such officers, for the uses and purposes therein expressed, and that they affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation and the said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. WITNESS my 2ai,and official seal at earwater, said County 'Ntwn h:\data\ml\Iwile\dimmittcar-ded.doc KIN. A O D0224974 j MY CWnn XMW20.M2007 and State, this day of June, 2004. Notary Public Print Name Y?A'1 A. ONBSCVJ My Commission Expires: INELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK J646 PG 2042 'EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL I: tJ;, THE WEST 41.0 FEET 0?,.L A AND THE EAST 9.0 FEET OF LOT 4; LOT 4, LESS THE EAST ;.D (FEET THEREOF AND ALL OF LOTS 5 AND 6, ALL IN MRS. N. E.,MCMULI?EN'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT;$OpK 10, PAGE 25, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL II THAT PORTION OF,-H FORMER RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING BETWEEN BLOCK 4 OF WALLACE ADpI'r!b PTO CLEARWATER, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 6, PUBLIC RECORDS OR,R-ITsliSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS ONCE APART, AND MRS. •N;E;14C MULLEN'S SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC ij6ORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING;-MORE"'PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM,,A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST;; ;-'SAID POINT BEING 1321.4 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16?_ P.,OCEED WEST ALONG THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF DRUID ROAD A DISTANCE OF 99'5`; €1 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WESTERLY ;BObWbARY OF SAID 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 04 DEG. 41'03" EAST, ALONG _':S'i,6 WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY EXTENSION, A DISTANCE OF 194.63 FEET TO THE POINT OF 2EGINNING. FROM SAID POINT CONTINUE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY NORTH 04 DEG. 41'03" -EAST A DISTANCE OF 159.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG.04'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF '.:'.b0.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEG. 41103" WEST A DISTANCE OF 159.54 FEET THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 10114" WEST A DISTANCE OF 60.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL III: LOTS 1 AND 2, TOGETHER WITH THAT PART OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST-WEST ALLEY ABUTTING SAID LOTS ON THE SOUTH; LOT 3, TOGETHER WITH THAT PART OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST-WEST ALLEY ABUTTING SAID LOT ALSO THAT PART OF THE ALLEY RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH WHICH ABUTS LOT 3 ON THE SOUTH, BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS; BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3, AND RUN SOUTH 151.5 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3, THENCE WEST 10.0 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 4 OF SAID SUBDIVISION SET FORTH BELOW; THENCE NORTH 151.5 FEET TO SOUTH BOUNDARY OF PINE STREET, THENCE EAST TO POINT OF BEGINNING. THE EAST 50.0 FEET OF LOT 4, THE WEST 100.0 FEET OF LOT 4 ALL OF LOTS 5 AND 6, THE WEST 108.0 FEET OF THE NORTH 52.0 FEET OF LOT 7 TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, IN BLOCK 4 OF SAID SUBDIVISION SET FORTH BELOW; FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 53.0 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE EAST ALONG AN EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 40.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54.0 FEET; THENCE WEST 190.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 4 OF SAID SUBDIVISION SET FORTH BELOW; THENCE SOUTH TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THE SOUTH 53.0 FEET OF WEST 3.0.5 FEET OF LOT 10, TOGETHER WITH THAT PART OF THE NORTH-SOUTH ALLEY LYING BETWEEN SAID LOTS 9 AND 10 ALL IN BLOCK 4, PLOT OF THE WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, FLA., ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 6, PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. LESS THE EAST 23.00 FEET OF THE WEST 30.50 FEET OF THE SOUTH 107.00 FEET OF LOT 10, BLOCK 4 OF WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, FLORIDA AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 6, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 7.50 FEET OF LOT 10, AND THE WEST 7.50 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE ADJACENT ALLEY LYING TO THE NORTH OF SAID LOT 10, TOGETHER WITH THE ALLEY BETWEEN LOTS 7 AND 10, ALL LESS THE SOUTH 107.00 FEET THEREOF, TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 42.00 FEET OF LOT 7, ALL BEING IN BLOCK 4 OF WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, FLORIDA AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 6, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. 'INELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 3646 PG 2043 'E%#IIBIT ",A" (continued) 0 ,k BEING FURTHER DESCRIBkDIAS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF LOTS/`'',,THROUGH 6, OF MRS. N.E. MCMULLEN'S SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOGY, 10, PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA TOGETHERtFIIT'?" THAT PORTION OF FORMER RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND LOTS 1 THROUGH 9, '.;BLOCK 4, OF WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAC1,E"6 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY,WAS FORMERLY A PART ALL OF WHICH LYING IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTFI,%RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED Aa" FOTiLOWS: BEGIN AT THE`,9OUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 4, OF WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER.--AS-,iECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 6 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROTJO--COUNTY, FLORIDA OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART BESNB'•"A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FORT HARRISON AVENUE; THENC$,AIONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 4 THROUGH'9•/ BLOCK 4 OF SAID WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, N.01°01128"W., 323?44 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF PINE STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID SlCklii`RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, N.89°48133"E., 383.48 FEET; THENCE S.03020146"W., 4.68 FEET;, THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, N.89°53'46"E., 2bU>97 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE, S.01°11129"E., 159.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH yINE`, OF LOT 3, N.E. MCMULLEN'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS ^?3"PHROUGH 6 OF SAID PLAT, S.89°54'05"W., 213.57 FEET; THENCE N.03°20'46"E., 4.63 FAST; THENCE S.89°48133"W., 203.82 FEET; THENCE S.01°01128"E., 164.74 FEET TO -THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DRUID ROAD (60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY); THENCE ALONG `•`• `SAID LINE, S.89°44'34"W., 167.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 2.768 ACRES (120574 SQUARE FEET) MORE OR LESS. THE ABOVE METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS THE SAME AS THE MUTIBLE PARCELS COMBINED. 'INELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK #646 PG 2044 i4 tM ' • ? J EXHIBIT "B'• i i.?try 1. Subject:.'to,2004 real estate taxes, not yet due and payable. Parcel 1•D.,!No. 16/29/15/53910/000/0030 Parcel No. 16/29/15/53910/000/0040 Parcel'.3.16. No. 16/29/15/94626/004/0010 Parcel,,I.D. No. 16/29/15/94626/004/0080 Par8@1,rA D. No. 16/29/15/94626/004/0090 2. Subject to Easement for Drainage and Utility recorded in O.R. Book `?4 82,, page 1164, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. 31,.-;`'$ubject to Easement for Drainage and Utility recorded in O.R. P6pk)3685, page 794, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. 4--' Subject to Distribution Easement in favor of Florida Power '.``Corporation recorded in O.R. Book 5293, page 1080, public records ?.,,of Pinellas County, Florida. h:\data\rel\bolle\dimmittcar-0ed.doc • • u >'M ROOF: MONIER LIFETILE "BRANDYWINE BLEND" E.I.F.S. TRIM BANDS & FASCIAS: E.I.F.S. MAIN BODY: SW 7005 "PURE WHITE" SW 6667 "AFTERGLOW" STONE BASE, BULLNOSE & LINTELS: ARRISCRAFT "WHITE" NEW BRANCH BANK DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER INTERPLAN J AMSOUTH PROP. ID. NO. FLWC03078RL CLEARWATER, FLORIDA APCIJ, 70 .E„GJ,E,_. = fUORI -SIGN- PP0,IC' riv r.?xc c+- i?esw?ris.a s?o wEi?e urwE4ncsnvu.ne .. .. , a csoarn w,rtsw va.a?z vaurx? INTERPLAN NO. 2003.0608 11-10-05 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION/ WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS/ U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS JOINT APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT/ AUTHORIZATION TO USE STATE OWNED SUBMERGED LANDS/ FEDERAL DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT a I T pL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE O PERMIT APPLICATION v ? SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMEN o ? T DISTRICT by 9? ri 2379 BROAD STREET • BROOKSVILLE, FL 34609-6899 gGaMS (352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (800) 423-1476 FOR`AGENCY USE ONLY ACOE Application # DEPANMD Application # Date Received Date Received # Proposed Project Latitude Fee Received $ Proposed Project Longitude Fee Receipt # SECTION A PART 1: Are any of the activities described in this application proposed to occur in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters? ? yes X no Is this application being filed by or on behalf of an entity eligible for a fee reduction? ? yes X no PART 2: A. Type of Environmental Resource Permit Requested (check at least one) ? Noticed General - include information requested in Section B. ? Standard General (single family dwelling)-include information requested in Sections C and D. X Standard General (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E. ? Standard General (minor systems) - include information requested in Sections C and H. ? Standard General (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I. ? Individual (single family dwelling) - include information requested in Sections C and D. ? Individual (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E. ? Individual (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I. ? Conceptual - include information requested in Sections C and E. ? Mitigation Bank (construction) - include information requested in Section C and F. (If the proposed mitigation bank involves the construction of a surface water management system requiring another permit listed above, check the appropriate box and submit the information requested by the applicable section.) ? Mitigation Bank (conceptual) - include information requested in Section C and F. B. Type of activity for which you are applying (check at least one) X Construction or operation of a new system, including dredging or filling in, on or over wetlands and other surface waters. (If reapplying for an expired, denied or withdrawn permit/ application please provide previous permit ? Alteration or operation of an existing system which was not previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. ? Modification of a system previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. Provide previous permit # and check applicable modification type. ? Alteration of a system ? Extension of permit duration ? Abandonment of a system ? Construction of additional phases of a system ? Removal of a system C. Are you requesting authorization to use State Owned Submerged Lands. ? yes X no If yes, include the information requested in Section G. D. For activities in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters, check type of federal dredge and fill permit requested: ? Individual ? Programmatic General ? General ? Nationwide X Not Applicable N/A E. Are you claiming to qualify for an exemption? ?yes X no If yes, provide rule number if known FORM 547.27/ERP(8-94)A Page 1 of 5 • • PART 3: A. OWNER(S) OF LAND B. APPLICANT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER) NAME NAME Gregory Y. Harris COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE AmSouth Bank Vice President - Properties ADDRESS ADDRESS 3000 Galleria Tower, Suite 1600 CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP Birmingham, AL 35244 TELEPHONE ( 205) 739-2484 TELEPHONE ( ) FAX ( 205) 739-2529 FAX ( ) C. AGENT AUTHORIZED TO SECURE PERMIT (IF AN AGENT D. CONSULTANT (IF DIFFERENT FROM AGENT) IS USED) NAME NAME Michael Boo Robert Ziegenfuss, P.E. COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE Interplan, LLC Interplan, LLC Permit Coordinator Director of Civil Engineering .ADDRESS ADDRESS 933 Lee Road, First Floor 933 Lee Road, First Floor CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP Orlando, Florida 32810 Orlando, Florida 32810 TELEPHONE (407 ) 645-5008 TELEPHONE (407 ) 645-5008 FAX (407) 629-9124 FAX (407) 629-9124 PART 4: PROJECT INFORMATION A. Name of project, including phase if applicable: AmSouth Bank- Downtown Clearwater B. Is this application for part of a multi-phase project? ? yes X no C. Total applicant-owned area contiguous to the project: 0 acres D. Total project area for which a permit is sought: 2.77 acres E. Total impervious area for which a permit is sought: 1.33 acres F. Total area (metric equivalent for federally funded projects) of work in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters: N/A acres or square feet (-hectares or square meters) N/A G. Total number of new boat slips proposed: N/A FORM 547.27/ERP (8-94) A Page 2 of 5 • • PART 5: PROJECT LOCATION (use additional sheets, if needed) County(ies) Pinellas Section(s) 16 Township 29 Range 15 Section(s) Township Range Land Grant name, if applicable Tax Parcel Identification Number 16 / 29 / 15 / 94626 / 004 / 0010 :01 Street address, road, or other location 715 Fort Harrison Avenue City, Zip Code, if applicable Clearwater, Florida PART 6: DESCRIBE IN GENERAL TERMS THE PROPOSED PROJECT, SYSTEM, OR ACTIVITY. The proposed development includes the demolition of existing structure and construction of a new 7,500 square foot footprint - two (2) story commercial bank with four (4) drive-thru lanes, one (1) ATM, with associated site work. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 3 of 5 0 9 PART 7: A. If there have been any pre-application meetings for the proposed project, with regulatory staff, please list the date(s), location(s), and names of key staff and project representatives. Date(s) Location(s) Names N/A B. Please identify by number any MSSW/WRM (dredge & fill)/ERP/ACOE permits or applications pending, issued or denied and any related enforcement actions at the proposed project site. Agency Date N/A C. Number/ Type Action Taken suomergea lands. mease provide the names, addresses and zip codes of property owners whose property directly adjoins the project (excluding applicant) and/or is located within a 500 foot radius of the project boundary (for proprietary authorizations, if any). Please provide a drawing, identifying each owner and adjoining property lines. (Use additional sheets, if needed. 1. N/A 2. 3. 4 5. 6. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 4 of 5 PART 8: A. By signing this application form, I am applying, or I am applying on behalf of the owner or applicant, for the permit and/or proprietary authorizations 'identified above, according to the supporting data and other incidental information filed with this application. I am familiar with the information contained in this, application, and represent that such information is true complete and accurate. I understand that knowingly making any false statement or representation in the application is a violation of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. I understand this is an application and not a permit and work prior to approval is a violation. I understand that this application and any permit or proprietary authorization issued pursuant thereto, does not relieve me of any obligation for obtaining any other required federal, state, water management district or local permit prior to commencement of construction. I agree, or I agree on behalf of the owner or applicant, to operate and maintain the permitted system unless the permitting agency authorizes transfer of the permit to a responsible operation antity B. AN AGENT MAY SIGN ABOVE ONLY IF THE FOLLOWING IS COMPLETED: I hereby designate and authorize the agent listed above to act on my behalf, or on behalf of my corporation, as the agent in the processing of this application for the permit and/or proprietary authorization indicated above; and to furnish, on request, supplemental information in support of the application. In addition, I authorize the above-listed agent to bind me, or my corporation, to perform any requirement which may be necessary to procure the permit or authorization indicated above. U. I certify that the engi in lures f thi surface water management system have been designed by me or under my respo le arge d my p ofessional opinion conform with sound engineering principles and all applicable rule an spec s. I fu er agree that I or my engineering firm will furnish the applicant 1 4), erm ttee with sa sem in fit "m. ge ? t d chedules for maintenance and operation of the surface water y l r a, Robert Ziegenfuss, P.E. 56752 Signafu'r& rP . , 1 o ecor Name (p/ease type) FL P.E. No. d Af IY° S E A L• Interplan, LW Company Name `"' F2 ate~ i r* V X 933 Lee Road, First Floor C) _ k.. :. Company Address U;,,IPhonp: e ?5- SDO$ Orlando, FL 32810 S 4 - City, State, Zip 5 FORM 547.27/ERP(8194)A Page 5 of 5 either own the property described in this application or I have legal authority to allow access to the property, and I consent, after receiving prior notification, to any site visit on the property by agents or personnel from the Department of Environmental Protection, the Southwest Florida Water Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers necessary for the review and inspection of the proposed project specified in this application. I authorize these agents or personnel to enter the property as many times as may be necessary to make such review and inspection. Further, I agree to provide entry to the project site for such agents or personnel to monitor authorized work if a permit is granted. • • ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATION SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 2379 BROAD STREET • BROOKSVILLE, FL 34609-6899 (352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1. (800) 423-1476 SECTION C ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF APPLICATION This information is required in addition to that required in other sections of the application. Please submit five copies of this notice of receipt of application and all attachments. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL INFORMATION ON 8 %" BY 11" PAPER. Project Name: AmSouth Bank-Downtown Clearwater County: Pinellas Owner: AmSouth Bank Applicant: AmSouth Bank Applicant Address: 3000 Galleria Tower, Suite 1600, Birmingham, AL 35244 1. Indicate the project boundaries on a USGS quadrangle map, reduced or enlarged as necessary to legibly show the entire project. If not shown on the quadrangle map, provide a location map, that shows a north arrow, a graphic scale, Section(s), Township(s), and Range(s), and detail sufficient to allow a person unfamiliar with the site to find it. Location man provide on cover sheet of construction plans. 2. Provide the names of all wetland or other surface waters that would be dredged, filled, impounded, diverted, drained or would receive discharge (either directly or indirectly), or would otherwise be impacted by the proposed activity, and specify if they are in an Outstanding Florida Water or Aquatic Preserve: Not Applicable to this project. 3. Attach a depiction (plan and section views), which clearly shows the works or other facilities proposed to be constructed. The depiction must use a scale sufficient to show the location and type of works. Reduced Grading and Drainage Plan is attached to Stormwater Reports. 4. Briefly describe the proposed project (such as "construct a deck with boat shelter", "replace two existing culverts", "construct surface water management system to serve 150 acre residential development'): New construction of a 15,000 sq. ft. - two (2) story AmSouth Bank with four (4) drive-thru lanes one (1) ATM, with associated site work. 5. Specify the acreage of wetlands or other surface waters, if any, that are proposed to be disturbed, filled, excavated, or otherwise impacted by the proposed activity: No wetland areas are proposed to be disturbed. 6. Provide a brief statement describing any proposed mitigation for impacts to wetlands and other surface waters: Not Applicable to this project. NOTE TO NOTICE RECIPIENT: The information in this notice has been submitted by the applicant and has not been verified by the Southwest Florida Water management District. It may be subject to change prior to final agency action. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)C Page 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATION SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 2379 BROAD STREET • BROOKSVILLE, FL 34609-6899 (352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (800) 423-1476 SECTION E INFORMATION FOR STANDARD GENERAL OR INDIVIDUAL (INCLUDING CONCEPTUAL) ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMITS FOR PROJECTS NOT RELATED TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT The information requested below is for projects requiring either a standard general or individual environmental resource permit (ERP) not related to an individual, single family dwelling unit, duplex or quadruplex. Certain categories of information requested may not be applicable to all applications. In addition the level of detail required will vary depending on the nature and location of the site and the activity proposed. Conceptual approvals generally do not require the same level of detail as a construction permit. However, providing more detail will reduce the need for additional information being requested at a later date. Please submit all information on paper no larger than 24" x 36". A. Site Information 1. Provide a map(s) of the project area and vicinity delineating USDA/NRCS (aka, SCS) soil types. A USDA/SCS Soils Map has been provided in the Stormwater Report 2. Provide recent aerials, legible for photo interpretation with a scale of 1" = 400 ft, or more detailed, with project boundaries delineated on the aerial. An Aerial photo has been provided in the attached Stormwater Report. 3. Identify the seasonal high water or mean high tide elevation and normal pool or mean low tide elevation for each on-site wetland or surface water, including receiving waters into which runoff will be discharged. Include date, datum, and method used to determine these elevations. The S.H. W. T for the site is 3.5 to S. Oft. below existing grade based on the site geotechnical report. 4. Identify the wet season high water table at appropriate locations on the project site. Include date, datum, and method used to determine these elevations. The S.H. W. T for the site is 3.5 to S.0 ft. below existing grade based on the site geotechnical report B. Environmental Considerations 1. Provide results of any wildlife surveys that have been conducted on the site and any comments pertaining to the project from the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&W). Not Applicable. 2. Provide a description of how water quantity, quality, hydroperiod, and habitat will be maintained in on-site wetlands and other surface waters that will be preserved or remain undisturbed. Not Applicable. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)E Page 1 of 8 • • 3. Provide a narrative of any proposed mitigation plans, including purpose, maintenance, monitoring, and construction sequence and techniques, and estimated costs. Not Applicable. 4. Describe how boundaries of wetlands or other surface waters were determined. If there has been a jurisdictional declaratory statement, a formal wetland determination, a formal determination, a validated informal determination, or a revalidated jurisdictional determination, provide the identifying number. Not Applicable 5. Summarize impacts to wetlands and other surface waters: a. For all projects with wetlands or other surface waters on site, complete Table 1, 2 and 3, as applicable; Not Applicable. b. For docking facilities or other structures constructed over wetlands or other surface waters, complete Table 4; Not Applicable. c. For shoreline stabilization projects, complete Table 5. Not Applicable. C. Plans Provide clear, detailed plans for the proposed system which include specifications, plan, cross-section and profile views of the proposed project. The plans must be signed and sealed by an appropriate registered professional as required by law. These plans should show or include the following, as applicable: 1. Project and total land area boundaries, including distances and orientation from roads or other land marks. Refer to Sheet Cl of the Construction Plans. 2. Existing land use, land cover, and on-site natural communities, including wetlands, other surface waters, aquatic communities, and uplands (acreage and percentages). Use the USF&W Service's Classification of Wetlands and Deeowater Habitats of the United States forwetlands or other surface waters on the project site. Assign each wetland or other surface water a unique identification number which is consistent in all exhibits. Not Applicable. Existing topography extending at least 100 feet off site and includes adjacent wetlands and other surface waters. All topography shall include the location and a description of known benchmarks, referenced to NGVD. For systems waterward of mean high water (MHW) or seasonal high water, show water depths at mean low water (MLW) in tidal areas or normal pool in non-tidal areas. For docking facilities show the location, depths and access to the nearest navigational channel. Refer to Sheet C3 of the Construction Plans. 4. Floodplain boundary and approximate flooding elevations if the project is in the known floodplain of a stream or other water course. Identify the 100-year flood elevation and floodplain boundary of any lake, stream or other watercourse located on or adjacent to the site. The site is located on flood zone X - Firm panel 1203C0108G, dated September 3, 2003. This site is not located within a 100 year flood plain. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)E Page 2 of 8 • • 5. Boundaries of wetlands and other surface waters within the project area. Distinguish those wetlands and other surface waters that have been delineated by any binding wetland determination. Not Applicable. 6. Proposed land use, land cover and natural communities, including wetlands, other surface waters, undisturbed uplands, aquatic communities, impervious surfaces, and water management areas (acreage and percentages). Use the same classification system and identification number used in C.2. above. Please refer to the Site Data Table on Sheet CO of the Construction Plans. 7. Proposed impacts to wetlands and other surface waters. Not Applicable. 8. Locations of buffer zones abutting wetlands. Not Applicable. 9. Pre and post-development drainage patterns and basin boundaries. Show the direction of flow, including any off-site runoff being routed through or around the system and connections between wetlands and other surface waters. Refer to Sheet C3 of the Construction Plans. 10. Location of all water management areas with details of size, side slopes and design water depths. Refer to Sheet C3 of the Construction Plans. 11. Location and details of all water control structures, control elevations, any seasonal water level regulation schedules and the location and description of benchmarks (minimum of one benchmark per structure). Refer to Sheet C3 and Details within the Construction Plans. 12. Location, dimensions and elevations of all proposed structures, including docks, seawalls, utility lines; roads and buildings. Refer to the attached Site Construction Plans and Stormwater Report. 13. Location, size and design capacity of the internal water management facilities. Refer to the attached Construction Plans and Stormwater Report. 14. Existing and proposed rights-of-way and easements for the system, including all on-site and off-site areas to be reserved for water management purposes. No easements are needed as this will be a private system. 15. Receiving waters or surface water management systems into which runoff from the developed site will be discharged. The proposed system has no discharge and is designed to retain the entire 100 yr. storm event. 16. Location and details of the erosion, sediment and turbidity control measures to be implemented during each phase of construction and all permanent control measures to be implemented in post-development conditions. Refer to Sheet C3 of the attached Construction Plans. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)E Page 3 of 8 • 17. Location, grading, design water levels, and planting details of all mitigation areas. Not Applicable. 18. Site grading details, including perimeter grades. Refer Sheet C3 of the attached Construction Plans. 19. Temporary and permanent disposal sites for any excavated material. Not Applicable. 20. Details of the dewatering plan including: delineation of areas to be dewatered, location(s) of dewatering facilities and discharge. Not Applicable. 21. For marina facilities, location of any sewage pumpout facilities, fueling facilities, boat repair/ maintenance facilities, and fish cleaning stations. Not Applicable. 22. Location and description of any existing off-site features, such as structures, buildings, wetlands, other surface waters, stormwater ponds, which might be affected by or affect the proposed construction or development. Not Applicable. 23. Master development plan, for phased projects. Not Applicable. D. Construction Schedule and Techniques Provide a construction schedule and a description of construction techniques, sequencing and equipment. This information should specifically include the following: 1. Method for installing any pilings, seawall slabs or riprap. Not Applicable. 2. Schedule of implementation of a temporary or permanent erosion and turbidity control measures. Refer to Sheet C3.1 of the attached Construction Plans. 3. Method and type of material to be excavated for work in wetlands or other surface waters. Not Applicable. 4. Source and type of fill material to be used for work in wetlands and other surface waters. Not Applicable. 5. Dewatering plan including: duration of dewatering; the methods for containing the discharge, methods of isolating dewatering areas, and time dewatering structures will be in place. A Water Use permit may be required for dewatering. Not Applicable. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)E Page 4 of 8 0 • 6. Methods for transporting equipment and materials to and from the work site. If barges are required for access, provide the low water depths and draft of the fully loaded barge. Equipment will be transported to the site by truck. 7. Demolition plan for any existing structures to be removed. Refer to sheet C1.I of the Construction Plans. 8. Provide the name and address of the person who will construct the proposed project. The contractor has not been selected at this time. 9. Identify the schedule and party responsible for completing construction monitoring, record drawings, and as-built certifications for the project. Interplan, LLC and the Site Contractor will provide this information upon completion of the project construction. E. Drainage Information 1. Provide pre-development and post-development drainage calculations, signed and sealed by an appropriate registered professional, as follows: a. Runoff characteristics, including area, runoff curve number or runoff coefficient, and time of concentration for each drainage basin; Please refer to the Stormwater Report. b. Seasonal high water table elevations including aerial extent and magnitude of any proposed water table drawdown; Please refer to the Stormwater Report. c. Normal, wet season, and design storm elevations of receiving waters; Please refer to the Stormwater Report. d. Design storms used including rainfall depth, duration, frequency, and distribution; Please refer to the Stormwater Report. e. Runoff hydrograph(s) for each drainage basin, for all required design storm event(s); Please refer to the Stormwater Report. f. Stage-storage computations for any area such as a reservoir, closed basin, detention area, or channel, used in storage routing; Please refer to the Stormwater Report. g. Stage-discharge computations for any storage areas at a selected control point, such as control structure or natural restriction; Please refer to the Stormwater Report. h. Flood routings through on-site conveyance and storage areas; Please refer to the Stormwater Report. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)E Page 5 of 8 L Water surface profiles in the primary drainage system for each required design storm event(s); Please refer to the Stormwater Report. j. Runoff peak rates and volumes discharged from the system for each required design storm event(s); Please refer to the Stormwater Report. k. Tail water history and justification (time and elevation); Please refer to the Stormwater Report. 1. Pump specifications and operating curves for range of possible operating conditions (if used in system). Not Applicable. 2. Provide the results of any percolation tests, where appropriate, and soil borings that are representative of the actual site conditions. Refer to Soils Report located in Stormwater Report. 3. Provide the acreage and percentage of the total project, of the following: a. impervious surfaces, excluding wetlands; Please refer to the Site Data Table on Sheet CO and the attached Stormwater Report for this information. b. pervious surfaces (green areas not including wetlands); Please refer to the Site Data Table on Sheet CO and the attached Stormwater Report for this information. c. lakes, canals, retention areas, other open water areas; Please refer to the Site Data Table on Sheet CO and the attached Stormwater Report for this information. d. wetlands Not Applicable. 4. Provide an engineering analysis of floodplain storage and conveyance (if applicable), including: a. Hydraulic calculations for all proposed traversing works; Not Applicable b. Backwater water surface profiles showing upstream impact of traversing works; Not Applicable c. Location and volume of encroachment within regulated floodplain(s); Not Applicable FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)E Page 6 of 8 0 d. Plan for compensating floodplain storage, if necessary, and calculations required for determining minimum building and road flood elevations. Not Applicable 5. Provide an analysis of the water quality treatment system including: a. A description of the proposed stormwater treatment methodology that addresses the type of treatment, pollution abatement volumes, and recovery analysis; Please refer to Sheet C3 and the attached Stormwater Report. b. Construction plans and calculations that address stage-storage and design elevations, which demonstrate compliance with the appropriate water quality treatment criteria. Please refer to the attached Stormwater Report. Provide a description of the engineering methodology, assumptions and references for the parameters listed above, and a copy of all such computations, engineering plans, and specifications used to analyze the system. If a computer program is used for the analysis, provide the name of the program, a description of the program, input and output data, two diskette copies, if available, and justification for model selection. Please refer to the attached Stormwater Report. F. Operation and Maintenance and Legal Documentation 1. Describe the overall maintenance and operation schedule for the proposed system. Please refer to the attached Stormwater Report. Identify the entity that will be responsible for operating and maintaining the system in perpetuity, if different than the permittee. Provide a draft document enumerating the enforceable affirmative obligations of the entity to properly operate and maintain the system for its expected life and document the entity's financial responsibility for long term maintenance. If the proposed operation and maintenance entity is not a property owner's association, provide proof of the existence of an entity, or the future acceptance of the system by an entity which will operate and maintain the system. If a property owner's association is the proposed operation and maintenance entity, provide copies of the articles of incorporation for the association and copies of the declaration, restrictive covenants, deed restrictions, or other operational documents that assign responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the system. Provide information ensuring the continued adequate access to the system for maintenance purposes. Before transfer of the system to the operating entity will be approved, the permittee must document that the transferee will be bound by all terms and conditions of the permit. Property owner will maintain the on-site system. 3. Provide copies of all proposed conservation easements, storm water management system easements, property owner's association documents, and plats for the property containing the proposed system. Not Applicable. 4. Indicate how water and waste water service will be supplied. Letters of commitment from off-site suppliers must be included. Water and Wastewater services shall be supplied by the local municipal provider. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)E Page 7 of 8 e 5. Provide a copy of the boundary survey and/or legal description and acreage of the total land area of contiguous property owned/controlled by the applicant, including the project site. The Boundary and Topographic Survey have been included with the Site Construction Plans. 6. Provide a copy of the deed or other evidence of ownership, or in the case of an applicant, evidence of an easement or other documents evidencing authorization to perform the proposed work. This has been attached with the application package. G. Water Use 1. Will the surface water system be used for water supply, including landscape irrigation, recreation, etc.? No. 2. If a Water Use Permit has been issued for the project, state the permit number. Not Applicable 3. If a Water Use Permit has not been issued for the project, indicate if a permit will be required and when the application will be submitted. Not Applicable 4. Indicate how any existing wells located within the project site will be utilized or abandoned. Not Applicable FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)E Page 8 of 8 Date Received: 11/02/2005 AM SOUTH BANK F?{1v r ? 2005 CITy l °A ZAlPl R ZONING DISTRICT: D LAND USE: CBD ATLAS PAGE: 295B i • ORIGINAL FLS2005-11087 715 S FT HARRISON AVE PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet S?Cpt°' t Receipt #: 1200500000000010956 Date: 11/02/2005 11/2/2005 11:54:48AM Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLS2005-11087 03 Flex Std-Commercial 010-341262 475.00 Line Item Total: $475.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check INTERPLAN LLC R_D 15955 In Person 475.00 Payment Total: $475.00 / 1` Z CL? 1-4 C-, LU O cz LL rg * THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 • ,r° Clearwater u Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 19 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION 9 SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans Ad SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $,`47-5 00 (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT (Revised 12/30/2004) - PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT -- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: AmSou-r'-) 9AI) lL MAILING ADDRESS: S000 &x+U e?Z'1A /Zyt? , SL-11 7-E / &0o t ?j ?. p PHONE NUMBER: Zo- =- 7-' 9 - zl U ? FAX NUMBER: 20S - 7-3 / - ZSZ- ? PROPERTY OWNER(S): AGENT NAME: W59 LAtQ , LL-0 -" Mllci 'a'a- 6CXl MAILING ADDRESS: 9,33 LEe 4wt> , E/'S-T 9Zvci2, ORLAlJoG, FL -32-91O PHONE NUMBER: 7'??? ?J7 SORB FAX NUMBER: 107 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: (F /A) TER/q-* J,94LAW, 0 0 .C0M B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 0 CASE #: F-LZ) OCL) J ?;- 11U DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: pN 1-3 (if not listed hf re, ple se noteJ?'e©location of this d current in th submittal) IyU y (.? ZU0 PARCEL NUMBER: /(G /Zy?/S/ GO??OO/d Tiy PLAi\'Nri? DI-PIZ AC?? PARCEL SIZE: Z. 74 (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): r Sj coo S?y?irzE Q;57r /SARI (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): I.C? - "'14 Attach sheets and be specific when id ing the r es include all requested code deviations; e.g. redu ' n in required numbe parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater r 10 ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) Alf SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. Id 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. PLQfiSE St7 /a-rzar M . 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. I LOKe Sge- f?-7`7'i4Cl 'p 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. . PL EME SEE ArrKV62 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. f i z-ogSE s E krriq cHcb - O Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning, District- to,which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1,;? N 61A ? rho wA(yew- &Qyi55 :`??'.'? ON 2 nn . ;.'--c CITY OF CLEMZA JER Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater • * ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with 1 City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. JV At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WFWMD) PERMIT SYBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable WILL fl-V10157 C? 0 f J CIC- Sl?& Vt 1 7`TAL l.D "erl -gogy'ff 70. 9d Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 5624750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) J $f SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; III TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; 96 LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; j111 GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) '?1 I Id SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): e ? " ?''e? ?- • ? All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; NOV d 2 2005 V Location map; V, Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; v' Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ?rt n 1'?? 4??? Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; x LAN NG ?LIN-tA., '? yr All required setbacks; ?? ?•A?, ??R??? V CRY i i OF All existing and proposed points of access; V All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater • * ORIGINAL V Location of all public and private easements; V Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Y Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; V All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Y Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; V Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; V Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and V Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. jilt SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: ? Land area in square feet and acres; V Number of EXISTING dwelling units; V Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; V Gross floor area devoted to each use; V Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; V Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; V, Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; J Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and V Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; `' • . .: ` 1 ,l "`- 0 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: A' C V One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; NOV o, 2 2005 %11 Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; V All open space areas; ??? V Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; V Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ,?h V Streets and drives (dimensioned); OF 0-1--i .1 Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) Qb LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. Q? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11) (color rendering if possible); IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater t t ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; '@ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale ULJrX-M) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. A i " I -7\ J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). , J E3 Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ? J r `J K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: fib Q • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. MY OF CLES,Ar':pi'l-RE 2 • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. JO Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs a each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property describe Vthi p ica Sl6daful-I erty owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PMfet=- I' E Sw n o and subscribed before' me this s? day of V , A.D. 20? to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as public, KENDRALAKEBERG MY COMMISSION N DD 069338 EXPIRES: March 1, 2006 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. . Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of - 's INTEPPLAN, 933 LEE ROAD, FIRST FLOOR ORLANDO, FL 32810 ORIGINAL PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 Chapter 3 Clearwater Land Use Plan/Redevelopment Plan Policy 1: The design guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in Downtown in which all projects must be consistent. Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. Policy3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The building design remains consistent with the guidelines and bridges the single residential area just south of the site and the fully developed core. The site is the first block in the South Gateway. The scale of the building south of the site is small and low with buildings set back from the sidewalk. The pedestrian traveling north and entering the district will encounter a moderate increase in scale with the landscaped wall separating the parking and the sidewalk before they encounter a two story building. The block development is a complement to the recently completed block to the north of the site with a South Trust bank, sub shop, small retail and Publix. The rhythm of buildings and parking will be consistent but not identical. The AmSouth block will be from south to north open/parking, building, and open/parking. The Publix block would be building, open/parking, finally building. Both Druid Road and Pine Street have one curb cut to allow vehicular traffic to enter the block. The open, then closed space will invite the pedestrian into the transition to the fully closed space found in the Downtown Core. The side of the site on Druid remains in character and scale with the next two office buildings both setback from the street and behind parking with a frontage of landscaping. Policy 9: Projects located at or near the border of the Downtown Plan area shall use effective site and building design features to ensure an appropriate transition and buffer between the different areas. The heavily landscaped wall and building fronting on Fort Harrison forms the necessary buffer between the single family residential area to the south and the Downtown Core. Policy 12: Drive-through facilities shall only be permitted as an accessory use and through a design that minimizes the views of the facility from rights-of-way and preserves the urban character of Downtown. The Bank drive-through is located on the back property line. It is behind the bank and is blocked from view from Fort Harrison. R ECV":Nov 0 2 2005 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGEMENT INTERIOR DESIGN AA 2 ItlO? DRA ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO TLA RTMIN development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanoriando,com . „? p. *-AI t Vf - • INTERPLAN LLC 0 ORIGINAL Policy 13: Places of worship and social/community centers are considered integral parts of the Downtown character districts. They are permitted uses that may locate or expand at a scale consistent with the character district in which they are located provided that all site plan requirements are met. The Bank will discuss the off hours use of the parking with the Church on the other side of Fort Harrison. Policy 14: The education of Downtown property owners should be emphasized regarding Clearwater building and property maintenance standards. Litter control and maintenance of landscaped areas shall be a priority for Downtown. The City will maintain its properties and public infrastructure as the example for the other property owners. The AmSouth Bank is committed to maintaining the landscaping with regular maintenance and care thorough local landscaping contractors. Policy 20: Shared parking for commercial, office and mixed uses should be accomplished wherever possible. Although the development of the one or two out parcels has not been negotiated, it is the Banks intention to provide cross access agreements and joint use of parking if the uses are compatible. Policy 23: The City prefers and shall encourage alternative stormwater management solutions rather than installation of on-site stormwater retention ponds. These alternatives may include neighborhood or regional stormwater programs that make significant improvements to the overall stormwater system and environment. The Bank will have a stormwater discharge pipe connecting to an existing stormwater pipe which runs adjacent to Pinellas Trail. Policy 24: The City shall give priority to sidewalk construction within Downtown that enhances pedestrian linkages and/or completes a continuous sidewalk system on all streets. The development will install sidewalk on all streets, Fort Harrison, Druid and Pine. D R FL, V? D NOV C 2 2005 PLANNING DIPAREYENT CITY OF CLFA ; ,-.TER ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com I" INTERPLAN LLC • 0 ORIGINAL. South Gateway District: Policy 1: The visual connection of the South Gateway should be strengthened with the Harbor Oaks Historic through streetscaping elements and building design. The development proposed will address the streetscape with both hard and soft elements. The building design will strengthen the visual impact of the east side of Fort Harrison. Policy 2: Residential Development fronting on South Fort Harrison Avenue may only be permitted if part of a mixed-use development. No lot split is being proposed. Policy 3: Curb cuts shall be discouraged on the South Fort Harrison Avenue frontage where alternative access can be provided. Curb cut onto Ft. Harrison Avenue has been removed. R'==07-il?^C DD NOV ( 2 2005 PLANNING DEPART Y-ENT CITY OF CLEr,,Z' 'ER ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs • www.interplanorlando.com INTCRPLAN., 933 LEE ROAD, FIRST FLOOR ORIGINAL ORLANDO, FL 32810 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 Section D. Written Submittal Requirements: 1. The proposed development complements the recently completed block to the north of the site consistent of a South Trust bank, sub shop, small retail shops and a Publix Supermarket through the rhythm of buildings, parking and design. The side of the site on Druid remains in character and scale with the next two office buildings both setback from the street and behind parking with a frontage of landscaping. The proposed site will not hinder or discourage development of the adjacent land. The two parcels resulting from the proposed lot split could be developed into mixed use by others. The Bank understands the issue and would include it in any discussion with possible future owners. The proposed divisions have been changed to show the Bank's development including its retention pond and two separate parcels. It is the Bank's intention to start negotiation with possible buyers after the Bank's development has reached acceptable level of approval. J 3. The proposed development has been designed in accordance to life safety practices to ensure the health and safety of those in residence/employment in the surrounding neighborhood. 4. The proposed development has been designed to minimize traffic congestion on Ft. Harrison Avenue by removing two (2) existing curb cuts, as well as removing previously proposed curb cut. In addition, the layout of the site has also been designed to control the direction and flow of traffic minimizing internal traffic conflicts. ? 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development in that its use is complimentary to the surrounding uses of retail and commercial as well as enhancing the urban character of Downtown. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties in that the proposed development is a commercial bank that holds regular banking hours and has been visually designed to be in harmony with the Downtown design criteria. DECD mnv 0 2 2005 PLANNI%G DEPARL; Y ENT CITY OF CLEAN ATER ARCHITECTURE ¦ ENGINEERING ¦ PROJECT MANAGEMENT ¦ INTERIOR DESIGN ¦ AA 003420 ¦ CA 8660 ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanoriando.com I `l a _J - a esve 90? ff> /?/ 6 z la ¢ (eo' c/? z .-c?.l Ell Sb 41 111 B i7 >r© zl?,® ryj l 1x le I I.i °'I II I? ? } , I ? IB 0 x10 ' g 1 ? .II rx0 7 P • 1 ii I JAN 6 S 1 I I I ? , J I • ? i 15002 SF - --Tw6 sraer- t s , a F.F.E.4000 - I ? Y S ? 1 R r aS' 6 ] IS 0.T 4 C v (. IID b 7 x ?? M r _Q?/„ 7 IG r? r? O SITE DIMENSION PLAN xBa ° p I 7 45' j 10 I , p ° S J S 4 0 TB I- O ¢ ¢ ¢ u' I/ I I 7 \?rJ-? 5 d xJ , IB ? I Y' m Id I e f ? \ ? >>S 27 I Fr ? IC N.°_ ,zb I b N - u x _ xl oaom xluo 19 fJ .,. (00 WITR a+ua?e. sr. i? ?ECTiiln 11. 10111S iP 29 5., RANGE IS E., CLE-lA ER. -17! AS CODUTI.'lORIDA ?k h E WERPLANV . ARCFRIECTURE ENGNEEM G INTERIM OE91GN PROJECT MANAGEMENT AA,W. GB¢00 9601FE RO+D, HCF PEWR OAIANBO. Fl01MN64610 - dlE T? I '? , ? I \ ' ? ppffOF SIE¢EHN55. PL \ R AfG /56x5x x CYNNAl17MT. ? j ¢ F I a? r?E j l Tt r dl REM- NOT IN CONTRACT 4 ? 1 ??? '? SINUMI6 M?O?N a [a-]0-tl m.' aWhMS TRIP COUNT CALCULATIONS .nB wauECnu ms ass aFF BEmP+am rxABlrcx ?,E IrE ,aP rsx?,. (PaN?-'. IXPoFA IarD LSE BIS BANE-ir 'n FOR tt? PAJFLEED sllE, Br5F0 dN ,RE SUlllff fOBTdfL (15000 fF) iRP THE PAOPOSFD BAN{ iKIL11Y I WtM In BAItt (PLi 1000 Sfl JWi I E. 1w0U?ID EIOxPMFA?EVE.OPe ^?HJGES?xM1A?NKEtO?IxE SIZE ??¢rro Q ,avinlrv riz n, m¢ lash euiimNQ coX sFCna+ II-4 , TRAFFIC CONTROL & SIGNAGE O luo vwK n<MD Sm- C4 O NANNCV slcx p -I C4 e O PA1f:NEM xlaOlts C4 Q xm B (PNxn CD,.... © D, MiRf SIB, BM (PAIN, O '00 xm ENIER• sIBN (RS-f1 ? 4• BBBe? ,0 Tw3Pa rtlibN PRIM ON iu;F 0 WgNxIC saEwan CIMB Ix0 F195i 6' 0.r aP of SIttAKK cmrwt slwu swig oznFBAX m w u me rz?omuB `r b llwslxn°r ? us BEPUmAEM a TwxmmiAnaAx -T' - - - -- - -- SITE NOTES 3 I"=30' ut IRPm,ENf7ns sxowl+ 1m2ox wfR BBU1wEB 4Ag1 Ofl900EA W.WIN4 N1O MEAE NBr wxsmuclm a rxE ror a sln OFSiCO wcMEm xsswfs xB wsnm FBA .cnmw-F NCLxsaUV'IEB 61APAB.'ETAENis Cd+IRAtIgt WALI. vERlh flm CONOIR? P0?f0AXM BIAXBOM ANB „on N 16RWEfn v urc Blscw<vavcRS dssr. AFSW ro SBS'I CO FOR LfNFwt x016, $IEBIFILAnbMS, xaV LL4]AM, IN aWInON r0 mf-srtaac xm6 Nx AfWRaXENa. ? - ww 15 z C4 n e CA Q s' cNAa t9 O5 XBNB -D, GIAB . EDEED. 3 9 C4 © CWKAErt wNA. e ?i wnaFrf wPLK onus aA .WINS xrB scBAE warps, e 10 C4 C? ?xurPPVaAExr C4 LJ OBNCPOE lIIIfD BBIIAAO (%E AREn, PIANS Wi PLALfVEx7. 1 i Q xa . xs oEaEE wulFF? Ox s,, C4 +ul (nv7 ? s' xisx mrtFK wat - JFE axcxlTEmuP,u Puns 14 C4 ? OPNw4E SRNCNAF (SFF SxEFT ]) 13 wN CETECTPBIF NanAMG NATKE Ix ,HIS e urzq Exarlo ro uu1TS 9,avx. C4 O SCA[Ex WALL c4 e aBa a cmTER '?4 PABPBS-B conc O rvm XsB ? . QOSIGIf NSIBltirv lAlultl£ I TO ?JEExC1f6'J.AE an?aK I]w nafl Q a B NIx6 Nat W t xU WNLIS TB DE ixSTalID M I PJI so- - P MATCN U.- COAB TO YXITS Sxbxla ? 18 .-D WK CUA. Y 0. D, Q® .-D "Es, To -. z Q fnmxc sIBEwAU ro AEXxix. ®Nm IrsED Q E POLE (ir'1 ®".X®uTx Bawl' u0m1FRM sax Q PAO OBEO vxllh GuTTFA e C4 9 ® ww at WO witx ENImNC SIOdPHI. a C4 O xPron ExtmxB CXAO > BMER AT LOdriOn' AaNx + mRICaR will C o D, YInH PwvArz CONWN! NR PART IRVSX It mlBx/sxnF00ixB D< BK+'f0 10.55x. . Q® Dlcm rl awx..T PmFB - BAlcx PanEAx -D aATa Am Do ro um : x?zorrtu ? E?? mrf eP V- -'. WII<a. aemAOrnOH ( . FlnF MOAaNR 0 Ew 9 X?Arpa°K ?% ?, BrO AFOm P?arnlFA?ll ? AMSOUTH BANK PROPENIYDOFLWCH076 R 715ULFAMMME. CIFAR'NAM, RORDA rxa mro woo 52406 C1 ? 4 tb'$ICd G; 8 I • INTERPLAN PRCMNCTURE . ., i - , ENGINEUINJ6 " INFERIORDE PROJECT NANAv'MENT ENi anow3xo Ca 86? F O - 9331fE xOAD. WIS'HONt OP4N00 H/MIDA 02 ,4 ee e ` - . e laf 8 Pv 43]-`- Fxt0? 9, 2x 629 , , i ? N ( ? ? ? e ?s 3? _ 'cas,ESnwa 9Y 'f J ? Ew a .;, eH 1 ) 1 p r. _.N,? W t k1 tt RU 611 {ro„ T 1tY ?N !(o ,w° I 1 o .. -? ,,a`- "?`/ ,_.y__...-_ =3"ea•.am-u-«a-zoaaz? at s,ae•s+w ..? '. b",.4.f 4 k? i re 1 L ,,, ?a I 1' "I ? n,„? v ro sE RHEU.3 p IN 1? L e 1 ? f: " ?\ Y) 1 - L l - } -tt? I i •? " ? any) 7m` - - n ?- „ nauro cosc ' E9 sa j O SFtaUB.'1ND OROUNb C012R 1 R re U3 MULT-TRUNK TREE DETNL T P1AV7NdG DETAIL P INE06 111T EH9i - IF hew E E LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS PLANT LIST 5002 & ) UN LANDSCAPE PLAN FEFER TO SHEET CO FOR GENERAL NOTES, SPECYICAMNS, AND LEGENDS, IN ADDITION ?D SITE-SPECIFiG NOTES pND FEp?\/Ur?p)EA\IEJ?N75. \. / ?^P'wc' ,En EUUR tier. ? ?3 V20Pi SE ]8{{5 c'. mErLS NE[,x (,uR,CU?,R157 zr x:. xs 5 xa G.C, rorccluc,ncx:?2? PUt?CSe fOA VMOH THEY WFIIe Un0# E I-R - V,tiA SF M A ? f IR,ODx WACGSRI W I - ? Df?PARED. RfPPODJC11ON0, CHMIGES OA P49GxaMEP05 AY .1.IER V x a Y6 uwoscar_ (KKnPf unRrl 2" ^u , - IRC a xnr s i Yk't1CiiPi? CiAwi -P21E (VARIEO,>FO LLRIWE) De l o l w P C ,a 0.., " PROM01fEA. 3. v?PGSFn ,iz' Ji aui uc uw,uClla ? fu Ia Rve) x ?a (:noux x '+5 a SUSa[hSVM R S C!L[OH a]0 MrtANR 0f RNA: INtERIOP PRPxING TREE; 1-L1 '.SO C x) Z -„ SMV3xw5n, ' IEWUJM) 36 D'. I.-- > >'N ` ? .?ERU C u) Ct.. R. w? 5 5W . xvV nE x.SRwiaw -I'T'll 11 ¢E l E o4 & P2 ?? Rollo ? er ?moxrG '7nt0 TREE LEGEND moo 2oD oa E C c -' ? 1 S. M' TFEE i0 - BE PER M'CL -F '. bs]a04 ` e 0 1 oV n, N '`'_ c n+Ew 7 ? ftC 11 All S" L 1 naLfwG. ,+ C+ES S a tt. 'EA,.' s,xue,. w+e sw?l '. KK'cES / E+E _ uEUF, . , s:NSO?>re a Prn _ uRCU .,I, co s., ccel?D: w, t?dlwsaie )'-30 `mac , AM50UiH wxO TREE PLANING DEWL ` AMSOUTH ,.R,. ,.. ... r BANK raoPFArr m w FtUK'a9n?erd I RNAAEIEONAF. 4U TREE&ARRIER MAIL, m WARlAIM NORMA > 5' . KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2004246339 06/17/2004 at 12:22 PM OFF REC BK: 13646 PG: 2040.2044 DocType:DEED RECORDING: $44.00 PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO : D DOC STAMP: $21000.00 HARRY S. CLINE,. Esquire Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen 625 Court Street, Suite 200 Post Office Box 1669 (33757) Clearwater, Florida 33756 ORIGINAL WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE made this 4th day of June, 2004, between DIMMITT CAR LEASING, INC., a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal place of business in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, Party of the First Part, whose mailing address is 25191 U.S. Highway 19 North, Clearwater, FL 33763, and AMSOUTH BANK, an Alabama State Banking Corporation, of the County of Jefferson, in the State of Alabama, Party of the Second Part, whose mailing address is 3000 Galleria Tower, Suite 1600, Birmingham, AL 35244, Attn: Properties Department. W I T N E S S E T H: That the said Party of the First Part, for and in considera- tion of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to it in hand paid by the said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of the Second Part, forever, the following described land, situate lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to- wit: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY. REFERENCE. THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE SUBJECT TO THE EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART ) 11-7c; NOV C 2 2005 CITY OF CLI VE ORIGINAL IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Part has caused these presents to be signed in its name by its President, and its corporate seal to be affixed, the day and year above written. Signed, Sealed and Delivered DIMMITT CAR LEASING, INC., in Our Presence: a Florida corporation gv-?4 a-CQ<?4t Name \AT4USDJ Ol0PMW STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS SEAL) By: I-A , z L ? LARRY. DIMMITT, JR. President (CORPORATE SEAL) I HEREBY CERTIFY that before me personally appeared LARRY H. DIMMITT, JR., as President, of DIMKITT CAR LEASING, INC., a Florida corporation, to me personally known or who has produced as identification and known to me to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instru- ment, and severally acknowledged the execution thereof to be their free act and deed as such officers, for the uses and purposes therein expressed, and that they affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation and the said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. WITNESS my ?a?+i?G,and official seal at earwater, said County C h:Wamlrellbolleldimmittcar-ded.doe KaWw A. O%wn MY UmrtMWon W224974 ' n Exp"jL4y20.2007 a and State, this ? day of June, 2004. Notary Public Print Name VW it- 0}1ViW.1 My Commission Expires: NOV 0 2 2005 C1W CF • EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL I: • ORIGINAL THE WEST 41.0 FEET OF LOT 3 AND THE EAST 9.0 FEET OF LOT 4; LOT 4, LESS THE EAST 9.0 FEET THEREOF AND ALL OF LOTS 5 AND 6, ALL IN MRS. N. E. MCMULLEN'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 25, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL II: THAT PORTION OF THE FORMER RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING BETWEEN BLOCK 4 OF WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 6, PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS ONCE APART, AND MRS. N.E. MC MULLEN'S SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, SAID POINT BEING 1321.4 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16, PROCEED WEST ALONG THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF DRUID ROAD A DISTANCE OF 995.67 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 04 DEG. 41103" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY EXTENSION, A DISTANCE OF 194.63 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. FROM SAID POINT CONTINUE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY NORTH 04 DEG. 41'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 159.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG.04124" EAST A DISTANCE OF 60.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEG. 41103" WEST A DISTANCE OF 159.54 FEET THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 10'14" WEST A DISTANCE OF 60.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL III: LOTS 1 AND 2, TOGETHER WITH THAT PART OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST-WEST ALLEY ABUTTING SAID LOTS ON THE SOUTH; LOT 3, TOGETHER WITH THAT PART OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST-WEST ALLEY ABUTTING SAID LOT ALSO THAT PART OF THE ALLEY RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH WHICH ABUTS LOT 3 ON THE SOUTH, BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS; BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3, AND RUN SOUTH 151.5 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3, THENCE WEST 10.0 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 4 OF SAID SUBDIVISION SET FORTH BELOW; THENCE NORTH 151.5 FEET TO SOUTH BOUNDARY OF PINE STREET, THENCE EAST TO POINT OF BEGINNING. THE EAST 50.0 FEET OF LOT 4, THE WEST 100.0 FEET OF LOT 4 ALL OF LOTS 5 AND 6, THE WEST 108.0 FEET OF THE NORTH 52.0 FEET OF LOT 7 TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, IN BLOCK 4 OF SAID SUBDIVISION SET FORTH BELOW; FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 53.0 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE EAST ALONG AN EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9, A DISTANCE OF 40.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54.0 FEET; THENCE WEST 190.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 4 OF SAID SUBDIVISION SET FORTH BELOW; THENCE SOUTH TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THE SOUTH 53.0 FEET OF WEST 30.5 FEET OF LOT 10, TOGETHER WITH THAT PART OF THE NORTH-SOUTH ALLEY LYING BETWEEN SAID LOTS 9 AND 10 ALL IN BLOCK 4, PLOT OF THE WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, FLA., ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 6, PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. LESS THE EAST 23.00 FEET OF THE WEST 30.50 FEET OF THE SOUTH 107.00 FEET OF LOT 10, BLOCK 4 OF WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, FLORIDA AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 6, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 7.50 FEET OF LOT 10, AND THE WEST 7.50 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE hn.TA0- --1 T vTwTn NOV 0 2 2005 C9 iY CF C17.!.7. ;.? • EXHIBIT ".A" (continued) 0 ORIGINAL BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 3 THROUGH 6, OF MRS. N.E. MCMULLEN'S SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 25 OF THE.PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF FORMER RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND LOTS 1 THROUGH 9, BLOCK 4, OF WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 6 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART ALL OF WHICH LYING IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 4, OF WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 6 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART BEING A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FORT HARRISON AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 91 BLOCK 4 OF SAID WALLACE ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, N.01001'28"W., 323.94 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF PINE STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, N.89°48'33"E., 383.48 FEET; THENCE S.03°20146"W., 4.68 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, N.89053'46"E., 200.97 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE, S.01°11'29"E., 159.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 3, N.E. MCMULLEN'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 3 THROUGH 6 OF SAID PLAT, S.89°54'05"W., 213.57 FEET; THENCE N.03020146"E., 4.63 FEET; THENCE S.89048'33"W., 203.82 FEET; THENCE S.01°01128"E., 164.74 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DRUID ROAD (60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY); THENCE ALONG SAID LINE, S.89044'34"W., 167.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 2.768 ACRES (120574 SQUARE FEET) MORE OR LESS. THE ABOVE METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS THE SAME AS THE MUTIBLE PARCELS COMBINED. NOV C 2 2005 , ,, .,.7-,-SIT cl-lycr EXHIBIT "B" ORIGINAL 1. Subject to 2004 real estate taxes, not yet due and payable. Parcel I.D. No. 16/29/15/53910/000/0030 Parcel I.D. No. 16/29/15/53910/000/0040 Parcel I.D. No. 16/29/15/94626/004/0010 Parcel I.D. No. 16/29/15/94626/004/0080 Parcel I.D. No. 16/29/15/94626/004/0090 2. Subject to Easement for Drainage and Utility recorded in O.R. Book 4982, page 1164, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. 3. subject to Easement for Drainage and Utility recorded in O.R. Book 3685, page 794, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. 4. Subject to Distribution Easement in favor of Florida Power Corporation recorded in O.R. Book 5293, page 1080, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. h: \daa\rel\bolle\dimmittcar-ded.doc 73 i r r NOV C 2 2005 pU' AmSouth Bank 6 Post Office Box 11007 Birmingham, Alabama 35288 (205) 326-5120 ? ORIGINAL jWSOM0 Date October 31, 2005 Reference: AmSouth Bank- Downtown Clearwater IP/AmSouth ID# FLWCl03078RL Project Location 715 Fort Harrison Avenue To Whom It May Concern: Please accept this letter as authorization for Michael Boo c/o Interplan, LLC to act on behalf of AmSouth Bank regarding correspondence and representation of all approval and permitting matters required for the AmSouth Bank Project referenced above. If you have any questions, please contact me at 205-739-2484. reg arri ice President STATE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF JEFFERSON Before me personally appeared Gregory Y. Harris who being duly sworn, swears and affirms that the above information is true to the best of his/her knowledge. Signed and sworn to before me this.-?Vday of Wt, , who I personally know- Notary Seal My Commission Expires: LtiTtiship 11 unique Clay * Bond No. 68946943N i v Notary Public for the State of Alabama g^?ar °y Commission Expires.. February 18, 2008 mfiv ( 2 ti 05 INTERPLAN 933 LEE ROAD, FIRST FLOOR F: r ?? r rt l ORLANDO, FL 32810 ?. J 1,iV PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 I;;?V c 2 2005 Cy TRANSMITTAL ORIGINAL City of Clearwater Planning Department 2003.0608/ FLWC03078RL TO PROJECT NO. 100 South Myrtle Avenue November 2, 2005 DATE Clearwater, Florida 33756 Hand Carry WE ARE SENDING VIA Gina Clayton 727-562-4587 ATTENTION TELEPHONE AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater gina.claytonPmyclearwater.com PROJECT EMAIL ADDRESS DRC Site Review Submittal SUBJECT COPIES SETS DATE DESCRIPTION 15 Civil Plans (signed and sealed) 15 Reduced Landscape and Site Plan 8 'h x 11 (Attached to Plans) 15 Colored Elevations and Colored Floor Plans (Attached to Plans) 15 Application with Attached Narrative (Attached to Plans) 15 Letter of Authorization & Warranty Deed (Attached to Plans) 1 Interplan Check #15955 for $475.00 (Application Fee) REMARKS Ms. Clayton, Please find enclosed the required information needed for DRC Site Plan Review of the above mentioned project. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 407-645-5008. If I am not available, Rick Krietemeyer is the Civil Engineering Program Manger and will be able to assist you. Thank you. Michael Boo G. Harris, T. Tobin, G. Neblock, R. Krietemeyer, U. Branstetter, File BY cc F:\A-.MmSoufh\2003.0608\Transm ittals\030608tro39. doc ARCHITECTURE ¦ ENGINEERING ¦ PROJECT MANAGEMENT • INTERIOR DESIGN ¦ AA 003420 ¦ CA 8660 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com A' -.4TEa, ,,?? ??iil10 LONG RANGH PLANNING DEV@LOPM1, I' R,•;VIIiW September 29, 2006 Mr. Michael Boo Interplan, LLC 933 Lee Road, 1" Floor Orlando, FL 32810 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos'r Orrrc:,: Box 4748, CLSAmATHIt, RoRIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. Si-'S BuILDING, 100 Souni Mvaru: AVENUE, CL,:AIiwA?ri:ii, FLoaIUA 33756 "r,,,.,:P1I0M: (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order for Case No. FLS2005-1 1087 - 715 South Fort Harrison Avenue Dear Mr. Boo: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On February 2, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to establish a bank with attached drive-thru facility (Retail Sales and Service) within the Downtown (D) District, pursuant to Section 2-902.N. The DRC APPROVED the application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 2.77-acres subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property and development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines contained therein as it is located within the South Gateway character district; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the South Gateway character district; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Retail Sales and Service Use, as per Section 2-902.N; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3-913; and 7. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. .Ic,icn I)cn;:?n, ("()r• .n.>cr:wcer I It ill I1:\\ni:rcix, Cc)c Wn.wtWWR BILL 1()a,()N. (:Or.NcIIAWNn-bR C rien :V PI:1 rsr. , G)I mmmrmisrr „I:c,uni. 1:,\lI 1 n Mm.N r ANI) Aurwm:\ nvi[ AC I 1?•?IPi c FI," September 29, 2006 FLS2005-11087 - Page 2 Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the DRC, and be approved by Staff; 2. That the applicant shall construct a west bound deceleration/right turn lane along Druid Road from S. Ft. Harrison extending a length of 265-feet, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. 5. That all utility equipment including but not limited to electrical and water meters is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured at least 48 hours prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the City of Clearwater Construction Index #116, Paving Header and Brick Paver Detail, for driveway construction be included in design documents, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 12. That Sewer Lateral and Cleanout Detail #305 be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 13. That a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 14. That a right-of-way permit be obtained to construct the off-site storm pipe extension; 15. That a copy of the Pinellas County permit to open cut the Pinellas Trail to construct the proposed storm pipe, be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 16. That an engineering analysis demonstrating that seepage will not occur through pond banks be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 17. That two copies of the original CAD drawing for plan sheet C-3 be provided showing additional topography for adjacent properties up to 50 feet of the property lines; 18. That the Civil and Landscape plans be revised to show removed trees consistently, prior to the issuance of a building permit; 19. That the tree preservation plan be revised to show a root prune line for the storm line under the oak trees at the end of Pine Street, prior to the issuance of a building permit; S: IPlanr:ir:g DepartmerntlC D BIFlex Standard (FLS)Vnactive or Finished CaseslFt Harrison Ave S 0715 AmSouth (D) - ApprovedlFLS2005-11087 Development Order.doc September 29, 2006 FLS2005-11087 - Page 3 20. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Development Review Committee approval (by September 29, 2007); and 21. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above 21 conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the revised site plan dated May 4, 2006 and the revised application and building elevations dated received March 6, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (September 29, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. In addition, in accordance with Section 4-502.A, please be aware that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by the applicant or a property owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The Community Development Board (CDB) would hear an appeal application. The appeal period for your case will expire on October 10, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Robert G. Tefft, Planner III, at 727-562-4539. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael el , AIC Planning Director S: (Planning DeparbnentlC D MFlex Standard (FLS)llnactive or Finished CaseslFt Harrison Ave S0715 AmSouth (D) - ApprovedlFLS2005-11087 Development Order.doc r v -'r.,?I LONG RANGE PIANNING DrVrI.OPMrN-"I' RL:vn..w September 29, 2006 Mr. Michael Boo Interplan, LLC 933 Lee Road, 1 S` Floor Orlando, FL 32810 C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos-r Orri(:r Box 4748, CLI?ARWATF.R FI.oRIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SE..RViCrS BUILDING, 100 Scum MvR'n.r. AVIiNCr, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order for Case No. FLS2005-11087 = 715 South Fort Harrison Avenue Dear Mr. Boo: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On February 2, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to establish a bank with attached drive-thru facility (Retail Sales and Service) within the Downtown (D) District, pursuant to Section 2-902.N. The DRC APPROVED the application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 2.77-acres subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property and development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines contained therein as it is located within the South Gateway character district; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the South Gateway character district; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Retail Sales and Service Use, as per Section 2-902.N; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3-913; and 7. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. I G:V.n I111M IM. MAY(M JDnN I Im I I hNIII [uN, COI Nc:u_wt> mwl" 1 IH,JONY)N, OA N(:u.w:M]WR (.:\KLEN A. PPrr:rseN, G)i \('10IINIW; "Du.;U. FMITM NIFN I AND Ai:i;n mm w!. ACru )N EMIT()) FI," September 29, 2006 FLS2005-11087 - Page 2 Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the DRC, and be approved by Staff; 2. That the applicant shall construct a west bound deceleration/right turn lane along Druid Road from S. Ft. Harrison extending a length of 265-feet, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. 5. That all utility equipment including but not limited to electrical and water meters is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured at least 48 hours prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the City of Clearwater Construction Index #116, Paving Header and Brick Paver Detail, for driveway construction be included in design documents, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 12. That Sewer Lateral and Cleanout Detail #305 be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 13. That a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 14. That a right-of-way permit be obtained to construct the off-site storm pipe extension; 15. That a copy of the Pinellas County permit to open cut the Pinellas Trail to construct the proposed storm pipe, be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 16. That an engineering analysis demonstrating that seepage will not occur through pond banks be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 17. That two copies of the original CAD drawing for plan sheet C-3 be provided showing additional topography for adjacent properties up to 50 feet of the property lines; 18. That the Civil and Landscape plans be revised to show removed trees consistently, prior to the issuance of a building permit; 19. That the tree preservation plan be revised to show a root prune line for the storm line under the oak trees at the end of Pine Street, prior to the issuance of a building permit; S: (Planning DepartnientlC D BIFles Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslFt Harrison Ave S 0715 AmSouth (D) - ApprovedlFLS2005-11087 Development Order.doc September 29, 2006 FLS2005-11087 - Page 3 20. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Development Review Committee approval (by September 29, 2007); and 21. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above 21 conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the revised site plan dated May 4, 2006 and the revised application and building elevations dated received March 6, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (September 29, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. In addition, in accordance with Section 4-502.A, please be aware that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by the applicant or a property owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The Community Development Board (CDB) would hear an appeal application. The appeal period for your case will expire on October 10, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Robert G. Tefft, Planner III, at 727-562-4539. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Micha!Me ; AIC Planning Director S: (Planning DeparbnentlC D BIFlex Standard (FLS)11nactive or Finished CasesTt Harrison Ave S 0715 AInSouth (D) - ApprovedIFLS2005-11087 Development Order.doc 0 0 TER, i.off LONG RANGF PIANNING DGVHLOPMBNT Rrvn;w September 29, 2006 Mr. Michael Boo Interplan, LLC 933 Lee Road, 1St Floor Orlando, FL 32810 C IT'Y OF C LEARWAT'ER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr Orru;i: Box 4748, Cu--.AkwA-rtar, Ft.ofuDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL Si.,wi -'s Bun.DINC, 100 SOUTH MYRTu., AVIi\UE, CuiawAII:It, Rofm)A 33756 TE"I.H11110NI' (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order for Case No. FLS2005-1 1087 - 715 South Fort Harrison Avenue Dear Mr. Boo: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On February 2, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to establish a bank with attached drive-thru facility (Retail Sales and Service) within the Downtown (D) District, pursuant to Section 2-902.N. The DRC APPROVED the application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 2.77-acres subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property and development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines contained therein as it is located within the South Gateway character district; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the South Gateway character district; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Retail Sales and Service Use, as per Section 2-902.N; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3-913; and 7. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Na:\.NT I IIIMAI U, NIANur )c>u I)c>r:v?, Cnr c.u.>u:>nsrr I IMI I I:Uiii:fUN, C(M Ncai.Nnc.%usiuR Iin.rJc>?u x• Cni:xcn_ n:>n+r ® CIARIFN A. PFIENSF.X. CnrMALMI;NIBIT'' I;c t;,v.I{.?tri nau:?rA.NI)APPIK.NIAHVI:AC I1UX N.NtP1.0)FIR" September 29, 2006 FLS2005-11087 - Page 2 Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the DRC, and be; approved by Staff, 2. That the applicant shall construct a west bound deceleration/right turn lane along Druid Road from S. Ft. Harrison extending a length of 265-feet, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. 5. That all utility equipment including but not limited to electrical and water meters is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured at least 48 hours prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the City of Clearwater Construction Index #116, Paving Header and Brick Paver Detail, for driveway construction be included in design documents, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 12. That Sewer Lateral and Cleanout Detail #305 be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 13. That a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 14. That a right-of-way permit be obtained to construct the off-site storm pipe extension; 15. That a copy of the Pinellas County permit to open cut the Pinellas Trail to construct the proposed storm pipe, be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 16. That an engineering analysis demonstrating that seepage will not occur through pond banks be provided, prior to the issuance of any building permit; 17. That two copies of the original CAD drawing for plan sheet C-3 be provided showing additional topography for adjacent properties up to 50 feet of the property lines; 18. That the Civil and Landscape plans be revised to show removed trees consistently, prior to the issuance of a building permit; 19. That the tree preservation plan be revised to show a root prune line for the storm line under the oak trees at the end of Pine Street, prior to the issuance of a building permit; S: IPlanr:ing Depar•UnentlC D BIFlex Standard (FLS)IInactive or Finished CaseslFt Harrison Ave S 0715 AmSouth (D) - ApprovedlFLS1005-11087 Development Order.doc w i i September 29, 2006 FLS2005-11087 - Page 3 20. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Development Review Committee approval (by September 29, 2007); and 21. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above 21 conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the revised site plan dated May 4, 2006 and the revised application and building elevations dated received March 6, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (September 29, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. In addition, in accordance with Section 4-502.A, please be aware that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by the applicant or a property owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The Community Development Board (CDB) would hear an appeal application. The appeal period for your case will expire on October 10, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Robert G. Tefft, Planner III, at 727-562-4539. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael el rl,'IIC Planning Director S: Oanning DepartmenAC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CasesTt Harrison Ave S0715 AmSonth (D) - Approve&FLS2005-11087 Development Order.doc Tefft, Robert From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:37 AM To: Tefft, Robert Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLS2005-11087 - 715 S Ft. Harrison Robert, Traffic comments #1 and #2 have been updated in Permit Plan as follows. Per review with Ben, these comments must be addressed prior to issuance of a DO. 1. The applicant shall submit a revised "Traffic Impact Study" for review and to mitigate any impacts to the roadway network below the City's acceptable level of service (LOS). COMMENTS ON TIA DATED APRIL 2006: A. EXPLAIN WHY ON FIGURE 4 THAT THE PROJECTED NORTH AND SOUTH BOUND TRAFFIC ON FT. HARRISON AT DRUID ROAD ARE LESS THAN THE EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS ON FIGURE 2? B. LOS VALUES MAY NEED TO BE RECALCULATED BASED UPON ABOVE COMMENT. IF LOS IS CALCULATED AS "F" THEN MITIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED. C. WHY ARE EXISTING (60 SEC.) AND PROPOSED (84 SEC.) CYCLE LENGTHS DIFFERENT FOR US 19A & DRUID ROAD IN HCS PRINTOUTS? 2. The drive-through lanes as shown must be supported by the Traffic Impact Study to prevent vehicles from blocking drive aisle and stacking along Druid Road. 5/9/06 - TRAFFIC COMMENT #2 REGARDING THE LOCATION AND THE NUMBER OF DRIVE THROUGH LANES AND POTENTIAL CONFLICTS HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com M, riYill r =., Land Resource Condition Conditions Associated With FLS2005-11087 715 S FT HARRISON AVE Rick Albee 727-562-4741 03/14/2006 Trees shown to be removed is inconsistant between the civil and landscape sheets. Revise prior Not Met to building permit. 01/26/2006 1/26/06-Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, Not Met landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater (off site a well) and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. 3/14/06-Show a root prune line for the storm line under the oak trees at the end of Pine street prior to building permit. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 03/13/2006 The applicant shall submit a revised "Traffic Impact Study" for review and to mitigate any impacts Not Met to the roadway network below the City's acceptable level of service (LOS). COMMENTS ON TIA DATED APRIL 2006: A. EXPLAIN WHY ON FIGURE 4 THAT THE PROJECTED NORTH AND SOUTH BOUND TRAFFIC ON FT. HARRISON AT DRUID ROAD ARE LESS THAN THE EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS ON FIGURE 2? B. LOS VALUES MAY NEED TO BE RECALCULATED BASED UPON ABOVE COMMENT. IF LOS IS CALCULATED AS "F" THEN MITIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED. C. WHY ARE EXISTING (60 SEC.) AND PROPOSED (84 SEC.) CYCLE LENGTHS DIFFERENT FOR US 19A & DRUID RD IN HCS PRINTOUTS? 2. The drive-through lanes as shown must be supported by the Traffic Impact Study to prevent vehicles from blocking drive aisle and stacking along Druid Road. 5/9/06 - TRAFFIC COMMENT #2 REGARDING THE LOCATION AND THE NUMBER OF DRIVE THROUGH LANES AND POTENTIAL CONFLICTS HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. 3. The length of the parallel parking space shall be 23-feet not 21-feet in accordance with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. 5/8/06 - MET 4. Since the building has multiple doors, strategically locate the handicapped parking spaces. At a minimum, relocate one handicapped. parking space to the south end of the building. (Florida Building Code Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2.) 5/8/06 - MET All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Print Date: 05/09/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 INTERPLAN 933 LEE ROAD, FIRST FLOOR ORLANDO, FL 32810 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 May 3, 2006 Robert Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 727-562-4558 0 ORIGINAL REaM MAY A20fi PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Reference: AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Case Number - FLS2005-11087 - 715 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue IP#/AmSouth ID - 2003.0608/ FLWC03078RL Response to DRC Comments Please accept the following in response to comments dated March 30th, 2006: General Engineering 1. Comment: According to the City sanitary atlas, a sewer lateral exists about 55-feet east of manhole in Druid Road. Developer is encouraged to utilize existing lateral if practical to avoid open cutting roadway. MET... CONTRACTOR HAS INDICATED THAT EXISTING LATERAL DOES NOT MEET STANDARDS. CONNECTION TO MANHOLE IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO A CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT. NOTE: NIGHT-TIME WORK MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION. Response: Informational 2. Comment: Provide copy of an approved right-of-way permit from FDOT. NOTE: A CITY RIGHT-bF-WAY PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED INSTEAD AS FT. HARRISON WILL BECOME CITY JURISDICTION WITHIN THE NEXT TWO MONTHS. Response: Per my conversation with Mr. Steven Brown on April 27, 2006 a city right-of-way permit is required because Ft. Harrison will become city jurisdiction; however, Mr. Brown states we are unable to apply for this permit until this transition has occurred. We acknowledge we must obtain the city right-of-way permit at least 48 hours prior to commencement of any construction In the city right-of-way, and will forward the approved right-of-way permit once received. 3. Comment: Include in design documents and utilize City of Clearwater Construction Index #116, Paving Header and Brick Paver Detail fro driveway construction. Response: Please reference revised sheet C5.1, detail number 3. F:W-M?^?oCufh QD bb68\ or?espo^de^ceEo306o?pm- PROJECT MANAGEMENT ¦ INTERIOR DESIGN ¦ AA 0034pb ¦eCiA 8660 FLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA g development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanoriando.com INTERPLAN LLC • • AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 2 4. Comment: A City right-of-way permit shall be obtained at least 48 hours prior to commencement of any construction in City street rights-of-way. Response: Acknowledged. A City right-of-way permit will be obtained at least 48 hours prior to commencement of any construction In city street right- of-ways. 5. Comment: Use sewer lateral and cleanout detail #305. Response: Please reference revised sheet C2, note tag numbers 2 and 3, and sheet C5, detail number 6. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. ACKNOWLEDGED. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental 1. Comment: See Stormwater Comments Response: Acknowledged. Fire 1. Comment: All previous issued cleared. Response: Acknowledged. Harbor Master 1. Comment: No Issues. Response: Acknowledged. Legal 1. Comment: No Issues. Response: Acknowledged. Land Resources 1. Comment: Trees shown to be removed is inconsistent between the civil and landscape sheets. Revise prior to building permit. Response: Please reference revised sheets C1, CM, and C1.2. and L3. ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 2 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com INTERPLAN LLC • • AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 3 2. Comment: 1/26/06 - Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified Arborist, consulting Arborist, Landscape Architect or other specialist in the field of Arboriculture, This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater (off site as well) and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts, i.e. crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan: must show the tree canopy line, actual tree barricade limits, (2/3 of the drip line and/or the root prune lines if required), the tree barricade detail and any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. 3/14/06 - Show root prune line for the storm line under the oak trees at the end of Pine Street prior to building permit. Response: The tree at the end of Pine Street is proposed to be removed, refer to sheet L3 for minimal grade change in critical root zone areas for trees to be saved. 3. Comment: Show to be removed the 24" Oak tree near the NW corner of 604 Druid Road. This tree is declining and can become hazardous, Even though this tree is close to being on the property line, the proposed impacts will escalate its decline. Show to be removed prior to DO. Response: Tree is shown to be removed refer to sheet L3 NW corner of 604 Druid Road. Landscaping 1. Comment: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.6.4, where 50 or more-trees are provided, a minimum of five (5) species of trees shall be incorporated, Further, each species shall constitute a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of trees. 3/06/06: The number of required species has been met; however, the proposed Southern Magnolias and Winged Elms constitute only 9.9% and 8.2% of the total number of trees respectively, Response: Additional trees have been added to meet these percentages, refer to sheet L1 plant list. 2. Comment: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1, shrubs shall constitute 50% of the required green space. The landscape calculations submitted do not provide any indication as to meeting the criteria. 3/06/06: The revised plan indicates that 20,506 square feet of shrubs and groundcovers are proposed for the entire site. This does not address the above conditions as it pertains to interior landscaping and shrubs only. Revise prior to issuance of Development Order. Response: Calculations are revised refer to sheet 1-1 landscape calculations Parks and Recreation ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 3 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com INTERPLAN LLC • AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 4 1. Comment: No Comments. Response: Acknowledged. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit: Stormwater • 1. Comment: Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. Response: Acknowledged; will provide under separate cover once approval is received. 2. Comment: Obtain a ROW permit from the City of Clearwater to construct the off site storm pipe extension. Response: Acknowledged. 3. Comment: Obtain a permit from Pinellas County to open cut the Pinellas Trail to construct the proposed storm pipe, Response: Acknowledged. 4. Comment: All off site storm pipes are to be Reinforced Concrete Pipe with the joints wrapped per City criteria, (Met 3/09/06), Response: Acknowledged. 5. Comment: Provide engineering analysis demonstrating that seepage will not occur through pond banks. Response: Acknowledged. 6. Comment: Provide additional topography for adjacent property up to 50 feet off the property lines. Plan Sheet C-3 is of poor print quality to interpret off site information. In order to facilitate a review at the building permit stage, it is recommended that the two (2) copies that go to City Engineering be original CAD drawings. Response: Acknowledged. All sets of drawings will be original plots. 1. Comment: No Comments. Response: Acknowledged. Solid Waste Traffic Engineering ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 4 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com INTERPLAN LLC • • AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 5 1. Comment: The applicant shall submit a revised "Traffic Study Impact" for review and to mitigate any impacts to the roadway network below the City's acceptable level of service (LOS). Response: Please review the attached Traffic Impact Analysis. 2. Comment: The drive-through lanes as shown must be supported by the Traffic Impact Study to prevent vehicles from blocking drive aisle and stacking along Druid Road. Response: Please review the attached Traffic Impact Analysis. 3. Comment: The length of the parallel parking space shall be 23 feet not 21 feet in accordance with the Community Development Code Section 3-1402, Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. 4. Comment: Since the building has multiple doors, strategically locate the handicapped parking space to the south end of the building. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. All of the above to be addressed prior to Development Order General Note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and Fee Schedule. Planning 1. Comment: Please be advised that the proposed signage is not approved as part of this development proposal. The submittal of a separate Comprehensive Sign Program Application will be necessary, Response: Acknowledged. A separate sign permit will be applied for. 2. Comment: The existing tree to be retained along the north side of the property and adjacent to the proposed curved sidewalk should be removed and the sidewalk installed in a straight line. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. 3. Comment: Along the west side of the property there are several walkways connecting the public sidewalk to the interior of the subject property. Many of these connections lead directly to other walkways or handicap access panels; however, the northernmost of these will lead directly into a parking space and should be removed. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 5 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanoriando.com INTERPLAN LLC • E AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 6 4. Comment: Pursuant to the Development Code Section 3-1402,A., the standard dimensions for a parallel parking space is 8'x 23'. Revise the proposed parallel parking spaces to be consistent with this standard prior to the issuance of a Development Order, Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. Other 1. Comment: No Comments. Response: Acknowledged. Notes: Three sets of revised plans/materials must be submitted prior to the issuance of a Development Order. Further, these items must be submitted no later than 9/30/06 to avoid being withdrawn for failure to timely address DRC comments. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. If I am not available, Rick Krietemeyer is the Civil Program Manager or and will be able to answer your questions. Sincerely, INTERPLAN LLC L-6?- " 2W"-Z:4f? Heidi Rhodes Project Manager/Site Development Attachments cc: T. Tobin, CBRE; G. Neblock, Interplan, LLC; R, Krietemeyer, U, Branstetter, Interplan, LLC; File ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 6 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs • www.interplanorlando.com INTERPLANT 933 LEE ROAD, FIRST FLOOR ORLANDO, FL 32810 PH 407.645.5008 ORIGINAL FX 407.629.9124 RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 TRANSMITTAL This message contains confidential Information only for the use of the person named below and may contain communications protected by the architect-client privilege. If you have received this facsimile in error, you are hereby nolled that any distribution or copying of this facsimile Is prohibited and you are requested to notify the sender Immedlately by telephone and to return the original message to us at the above address. COMPANY NAME: City of Clearwater PROJECT#: 02003.0608 COMPANYADDRESS: 100 South Myrtle Avenue DATE: May 3, 2006 Clearwater, FL 323756 SHIPPING VIA: Hand Delivery ATTN: Plans Reviewer PHONE #: 727-562-4558 PROJECT NAME: AmSouth - Downtown Clearwater E-MAIL: SUBJECT: Site Plan Resubmittal Case #: FLS2005-11087 Copies Sets Date Descrlptlon 8 5/24/04 Plans Signed and Sealed 4 04/06 Traffic Impact Analysis 8 05/03/06 Response to Comments REMARKS: Please review the above items in reference to the AmSouth Bank Case Number FLS2005-1 1 08 7. If you have any questions or require additional information please contact me at 407-645-5008. Thank you, YOUR NAME: Heidi Rhodes CC: G. Neblock, U. Branstetter, R. Krietemeyer, File ARCHITECTURE . ENGINEERING ? PROJECT MANAGEMENT ? INTERIOR DESIGN ? AA003420 - CA 8660 ORLANDO ¦ DALLAS ¦ CHICAGO ¦ ATLANTA development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com F:W-J\HmSouth\2003.0608\Transmittals\030608tra52.doc ?4p: Case Number: FLS2005-11087 715 S FT HARRISON A Owner(s): Amsouth Bank ?- 3000 Galleria Tower Ste 1 Birmingham, Al 35244 TELEPHONE: 205-739-2484, FAX: 205-739-2529, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Interplan Llc 933 Lee Road I st Floor Orlando, F132810 TELEPHONE: 407-645-5008, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: mboo@interplanorlando.com Location: The 2.77-acre subject property is located at the northeast corner of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Druid Street. Atlas Page: 295B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Standard Development application to establish a bank with attached drive-thru facility (Retail Sales and Service) within the Downtown (D) District, pursuant to Section 2-902.N. of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood Drew And Plaza Park Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33755 908 Drew Street TELEPHONE: 443-0737, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: davidgricelaol.com Neighborhood North Greenwood Association, Inc. Association(s): Clearwater, F133755 1201 Douglas Road TELEPHONE: 560-4382, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: WADENWADE@AOL.COM Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I , The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. According to City sanitary atlas, a sewer lateral exists about 55-feet east of manhole in Druid Road. Developer is encouraged to utilize existing lateral if practicable to avoid open cutting roadway. MET........ CONTRACTOR HAS INDICATED THAT EXISTING LATERAL DOES NOT MEET STANDARDS. CONNECTION TO MANHOLE IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO A CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT. NOTE: NIGHT-TIME WORK MAY BE REQUIRED AT THIS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION. 2. Provide a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from D.O.T. NOTE: A CITY R.O.W. PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED INSTEAD AS FT. HARRISON WILL BECOME CITY JURISDICTION WITHIN THE NEXT TWO MONTHS. 3. Include in design documents and utilize City of Clearwater Construction Index # 116, Paving Header and Brick Paver Detail, for driveway construction. 4. A City right-of-way permit shall be obtained at least 48 hours prior to commencement of any construction in City street rights-of-way. 5. Use sewer lateral and cleanout detail #305. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. ACKNOWLEDGED. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 35 Environmental: Fire: 1. See Stormwater Comments. All previous issues cleared Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I , No issues. Land Resources: I , Trees shown to be removed is inconsistant between the civil and landscape sheets. Revise prior to building permit. 2. 1/26/06-Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater (off site a well) and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. 3/14/06-Show a root prune line for the storm line under the oak trees at the end of Pine street prior to building permit. R?l Show to be removed the 24" oak tree near the NW corner of 604 Druid Road. This tree is declining and can become hazardous, even though this tree is close to being on the property line the proposed impacts will escalate its decline. Show to be removed prior to D.O. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.B.4, where 50 or more trees are provided, a minimum of five (5) species of tree shall incorporated. Further, each species shall constitute a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of trees. 03/06/06: The number of required species has been met; however the proposed Southern Magnolias and Winged Elms constitute only 9.9% and 8.2% of the total number of trees, respectively. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1, shrubs shall constitute 50% of the required greenspace. The Ao? landscape calculations submitted do not provide any indication as to meeting the criteria. 03/06/06: The revised plans indicate that 20,506 square feet of shrubs and groundcovers are proposed for the entire site. This does not address the above conditions as it pertains to the required interior landscaping and shrubs only. Revise prior to issuance of Development Order. Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stormwater: Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 2) Obtain a right-of-way permit from the City of Clearwater to construct the off-site storm pipe extension. 3) Obtain a permit from Pinellas County to open cut the Pinellas Trail to construct the proposed storm pipe. 4) All off-site storm pipes are to be Reinforced Concrete Pipe with the joints wrapped per city criteria. (met 3/9/06) 5) Provide engineering analysis demonstrating that seepage will not occur through pond banks. 6) Provide additional topography for adjacent property up to 50 feet off the property lines. Plan Sheet C-3 is of poor print quality to interpret offsite information. In order to facilitate review at the building permit stage it is recommended that the two copies that go to City Engineering be original CAD drawings not files. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 36 0 0 1 , The applicant shall submit a revised "Traffic Impact Study" for review and to mitigate any impacts to the roadway network below the City's acceptable level of service (LOS). 2. The drive-through lanes as shown must be supported by the Traffic Impact Study to prevent ,t vehicles from blocking drive aisle and stacking along Druid Road. 3. The length of the parallel parking space shall be 23-feet not 21-feet in accordance with Community Development Code Section 3-1402. 4. Since the building has multiple doors, strategically locate the handicapped parking spaces. At a minimum, relocate one handicapped parking space to the south end of the building. (Florida Building Code Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2.) All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Planning: 1 . Please be advised that the proposed signage is not approved as part of this development proposal. The submittal of a seperate Comprehensive Sign Program Application will be necessary. The existing tree to be retained along the north side of the property and adjacent to the proposed curved sidewalk should be removed and the sidewalk installed in a straight line. ?. Along the west side of the property there are several walkways connecting the public sidewalk to the interior of the subject property. Many of these connections lead directly to other walkways or handicap access panels; however the northernmost of these will lead directly into a parking space and should be removed. Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 3-1402.A., the standard dimensions for a parallel parking space is 8'x 23'. Revise the proposed parallel parking spaces to be consistent with this standard, prior to the issuance of a Development Order. Other: No Comments Notes: Three sets of revised plans/materials must be submitted prior to the issuance of a Development Order. Further, these items must be submitted no later than 09/30/06 to avoid the application being withdrawn for failure to timely address DRC comments. lU ftDvI64siwel -ra-, L+e-? ON "ice 145 ILI" L? WhS bo^t- Vi2ent?fo to PGPtK.? X16 '¢?nao w uoq! Try, r?v?; .,VMV M).eL ?o PSt P;r L.?. T . I CoQ?.v Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 37 INTERPLAM 933 LEE ROAD, FIRST FLOOR ORLANDO, FL 32810 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 March 3, 2006 Robert Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 727-562-4558 Reference: AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Case Number - FLS2005-11087 - 715 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue IP#/AmSouth ID - 2003.0608/ FLWC03078RL Dear Mr. Tefff, This letter is to inform you that the current engineer of record (Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing) has become ill and is on medical leave from the company. Mr. Dennis Matula P.E. #55194 will assume Engineer of Record responsibilities for this project from this date forward. Mr. Matula is employed by Interplan and will ensure continuity in the completion of the project. If you have any questions, please let us know. .N%V?.4 . Af)cerel?-`--- LqRj LI.C r 00 'low 00 ORIGINAL ? RECEivED ='.08vid B yl '-RA-NCARB MAC 0 F 2006 ,ern rig Director PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ARCHITECTURE ¦ ENGINEERING - PROJECT MANAGEMENT a INTERIOR DESIGN ¦ AA 003420 ¦ CA 8660 ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com INTCRPLAN Pj, i 933 LEE ROAD, FIRST FLOOR ORLANDO, FL 32810 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 March 5, 2006 Robert Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 727-562-4558 Reference: AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Case Number - FLS2005-11087 - 715 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue IP#/AmSouth ID - 2003.0608/ FLWC03078RL Response to DRC Comments Please accept the following in response to comments dated January 30th, 2006: General Engineering 1. Comment: According to the City sanitary atlas, a sewer lateral exists about 55-feet east of manhole in Druid Road. Developer is encouraged to utilize existing lateral if practical to avoid open cutting roadway. Response: Existing 6" lateral does not meet minimum design requirements for the building and will not be utilized. 2. Comment: Minimum turning radii at all entries into site and all turning points within the site shall be 30-feet to accommodate solid waste vehicle. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1, 30' radius have been provided at the driveway on Pine Street and the corner after the dumpster enclosure. 25' radius was provided at the driveway on Druid Road, per the DRC meeting these will be adequate. 3. Comment: Are all on-site, overhead power lines to be removed? Response: Yes, please reference sheet C1.1. 4. Comment: All of the above to be addressed prior to DO. Response: Acknowledged. 5. Comment: The following is to be addressed prior to building permit, ORIGINAL Response: Acknowledged. RECEIVED MAR 0 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ARCHITECTURE ¦ ENGINEERING ¦ PROJECT MANAGEMENT ¦ INTERIOR DESIGN ¦ AA 00340 ¦ CA 8660 F:\A-J\AmSouth\2003.0608\Correspondences\030608pmt14QRCANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA age i development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs • www.interplanoriando.com RECEIVED INTERPLAN LLC 0 0 MAR 0 6 2006 AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2 6. Comment: Show all City details applicable to this project. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our website: www.myclearwater,com/ oq v/depts/iwa/engin/Productions/stddet/index.a SID. Response: Acknowledged. Please see Sheet C5 for Civil Details. Comment: New sewer lateral shall be constructed per Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #305. Response: Acknowledged. Please see Sheet C5, Civil Detail #6. 8. Comment: Pavement restoration detail shall be Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards #104, Response: Acknowledged. Please see Sheet C5, Civil Detail#1. 9. Comment: A sanitary cleanout shall be constructed in ROW per Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards #304. Response: Acknowledged. Please see Sheet C5, Civil Detail Number 3. 10. Comment: Provide and copy of approved ROW Permit from FDOT. Response: Acknowledged; will provide once approval is received. 11. Comment: Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with the Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 109, including the ADA (truncated domes per FDOT Index #304). Response: Acknowledged. Please see Sheet C1, General Note Number 3. 12. Comment: Use City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #701 rather than dumpster detail provided (note: minimum 12 foot inside clearance required). Response: Acknowledged. Please see Sheet C5, Detail Number 4. 13. Comment: All utility pole relocations to be coordinated with the owners of such facilities as noted on drawings. The pole relocations will accommodate the proposed sidewalk and/or drive apron(s) installation within the right-of- way's of the adjacent streets. City requires a 2 ft. horizontal clearance from edge of sidewalk to any vertical obstruction. Response: Please reference revised Sheet C1. 14. Comment: Replacement of curb, gutter and sidewalk along the existing road (Fort Harrison Avenue) to match exiting curb, gutter and sidewalk. Response: Please reference revised Sheet C1, Note Tag Number 20. ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 2 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanoriando.com INTERPLAN LLC • • AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 3 15. Comment: General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant at their expense, If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Response: Acknowledged. Note is added to Sheet C2. 16. Comment: General Note: DRC Review is prerequisite for Building Permit review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged. Environmental 1. Comment: See Stormwater Comments Response: Informational. Fire Comment: Show that the pavers that are being used will support the weight of fire apparatus at 80,000 lbs. (Acknowledge prior to D.O.) (JFK) Response: Please see Sheet C5.1, Civil Detail Number 1 and 2. 2. Comment: Fire alarm to be installed per NFPA 72. (Acknowledge prior to D.O.) (JFK) Response: Acknowledged. 3. Comment: Provide 30 foot radius for ingress on north and south entrance. (Prior to D.O.) (JFK) Response: Please reference revised sheet C1, 30' radius have been provided at the driveway on Pine Street and the corner after the dumpster enclosure. 25' radius was provided at the driveway on Druid Road, per the DRC meeting these will be adequate. 4. Comment: Response: Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300 feet of the building as the hose lays and on some side of street as building, (Prior to D.O. ) Please reference revised sheet C2. Harbor Master 1. Comment: No Issues, Response: Informational. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 0 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 3 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com INTERPLAN LLC 9 AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater ORIGINAL Response to Comments RECEIVED Page 4 MAR 0 6 2006 Legal PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Comment: No Issues. CITY OF CLEARWATER Response: Informational. Land Resources 1. Comment: Reroute the irrigation to be outside of the canopy of tree # 16, 36" oak tree prior to DO. Response: Irrigation line is rerouted refer to sheet L2. 2. Comment: Show to be removed all #2 and below rated trees except #33 and #34, see Arborist Report. Trees shown to be removed are inconsistent between the Civil and Landscape sheets, Clarify prior to DO, Response: All #2 trees are removed as well as #33 and #44 due to grading for proposed pond, refer sheet L3 Tree chart. 3. Comment: Show to be removed the 24" Oak tree near the NW corner of 604 Druid Road. This tree is declining and can become hazardous. Even though this tree is close to being on the property line, the proposed impacts will escalate its decline, Show to be removed prior to DO. Response: 24" Oak Is to be removed refer to sheet L3. 4. Comment: Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified Arborist, consulting Arborist, Landscape Architect or other specialist in the field of Arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater (off site as well) and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts, i.e. crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan: must show the tree canopy line, actual tree barricade limits, (2/3 of the drip line and/or the root prune lines if required), the tree barricade detail and any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Response: Tree Preservation Plan provided ,refer to sheet L3. Landscaping Comment: The landscaping proposed at the northwest and the southwest corners of the property should, as per the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, be used as a design element and define the urban setting, Response: Landscaping provided refer to sheet L1, northwest ans southwest corners. ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 4 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com INTERPLAN LLC 0 AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 5 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 0 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Comment: Pursuant to Section 3-1202,E.1, shrubs shall constitute 50%a of the required green space. The landscape calculations submitted do not provide any indication as to meeting the criteria. Response: Calculations provided refer to sheet L1 Landscape calculations Comment: On the north side of the walkway adjacent to the north side of the proposed building, there is a landscape island, What is proposed to be planted in the island? Response: 3 Washington palms, 43 indain hawthorn, and 33 African irises, refer to sheet U. L4? Comment: Pursuant to Section 3-1202,6.1, shade trees must be planted a minimum of five feet (5') from any impervious area. Several of the Live Oak trees proposed will be in conflict with this requirement. Revise the landscape plan accordingly. Response: Washington palms proposed in place of shade trees due to 5' requirement. Refer to sheet L1. Comment: Provide landscaping on both sides of the ingress/egress point drive aisles that is consistent with one another. Response: Landscape provide, refer to sheet L1. Comment: The paved areas directly in front of the angled parking spaces on the east side of the property should be incorporated in the landscaping for the site. Response: N/A l Comment: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1, where the parking spaces provided exceed 110% of the required parking, the interior landscaping islands shall constitute 12% of the square footage of the gross vehicular use area. The submitted landscape calculations must be revised to reflect the above (an incorrect percentage is used on the plans). In addition, the plan depicts the intended locations of the 5,136 square feet of required landscape island; however, approximately 2,596 square feet of this is actually perimeter landscaping. Response: Provided, refer to landscape calculation on sheet U. Comment: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.6.4, where 50 or more trees are provided, a minimum of five (5) species of trees shall be incorporated. Further, each species shall constitute a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of trees. Response: 5 species provided, due to the 5' impervious requirement a higher percentage of Washington palms are used. `7 z, ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 5 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs • www.interplanoriando.com INTERPLAN LLC • AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 6 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 0 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ?f9' Comment: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with frontage along a right-of-way within a minimum five foot (5') wide landscaped area composed of at least two (2) accent trees or three (3) palms for every 40 linear feet of building fagade and one (1) shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. Response: Foundation plantings provided refer to sheet U. Comment: The development proposal is inconsistent with the above as it does not meet the required minimum landscape'area width along the west fagade of the building and the area does not include any accent tree or palms. Response: Provided refer to sheet U. Parks and Recreation s 1. Comment: Site Data Table needs to be corrected to show current conditions (square footage of existing structure) as well as proposed conditions. Open space/recreation impact fees may be due but are unable to confirm until all information is provided. Response: Please reference revised sheet CO. Stormwater Prior to issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Comment: Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. Response: Acknowledged; will provide under separate cover once approval is received. 2. Comment: Obtain a ROW permit from the City of Clearwater to construct the off site storm pipe extension. Response: Acknowledged; will provide under separate cover once received. 3. Comment: Obtain a permit from Pinellas County to open cut the Pinellas Trail to construct the proposed storm pipe. Response: Acknowledged; will provide under separate cover once received. 4. Comment: All off site storm pipes are to be Reinforced Concrete Pipe with the joints wrapped per City criteria. Response: Please reference revised sheet C3.2. 5. Comment: Provide engineering analysis demonstrating that seepage will not occur through pond banks. Response: Analysis was not completed in time for deadline re-submittal. Analysis will be provided under separate cover. ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 6 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com INTERPLAN LLC • AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 7 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 0 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 6. Comment: Provide additional topography for adjacent property up to 50 feet off the property lines. Plan Sheet C-3 is of poor print quality to interpret off site information. In order to facilitate a review at the building permit stage, it is recommended that the two (2) copies that go to City Engineering be CAD copies. Response: Acknowledged. Two (2) CAD copies on CD ROM have been included with this resubmittal. Solid Waste 1. Comment: That dumpster enclosure(s) needs to be constructed to City Specifications and shown on detail sheet. Response: Please reference Sheet C5, Civil Detail Number 4. 2. Comment: No issues. Response: Acknowledged. Traffic Engineering Comment: Provide a Traffic Impact Study since project generates 100 or more new vehicle trips per hour (Development Code Section 4-801). A TIA was submitted for our review back on June 24th. 2004 for the proposed 9,184 sq. ff. AmSouth Bank by Traffic Planning and Design, Inc...the applicant may submit a revised TIA for out review however, please set up a scoping meeting with Traffic Operations Division before conducting the TIA. Response: A revised Traffic Impact Study is in progress and will be provided for review once received. The Traffic Operations Division (Bennett Elbow) has been contacted. 2. Comment: Provide necessary improvements to bring affected roadway network to the Citys acceptable level of service (LOS) per Traffic Impact Study or as determined by Traffic Operation's Manager or designee (Development Code Section 4-802 & 4-803). Response: Acknowledged. 3. Comment: Provide the angle in degrees for the angled parking spaces and comply with current City parking dimensions (Citys Community Development Code Section 3-1402). Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. 4. Comment: Provide 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the Druid Road/Fort Harrison Avenue and Pine Street/Fort Harrison Avenue intersections (City's Community Development Code Section 3-904). Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 7 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com INTERPLAN LLC AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater ORIGINAL • RECEIVED MAR 0 6 2006 Response to Comments PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER 5. Comment: Relocate or reduce height of wall in sight triangle at driveway from Druid Road. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. 6. Comment: Show location of any existing mast arm column and signal cabinet. Applicant's structure(s) must not interfere with signal cabinet and most arm column. Response: Acknowledged; Mast Arms are not located on our side of the street. 7. Comment: For five drive-through lanes, they must be able to accommodate 22 vehicles without impeding drive aisles or parking spaces. Redesign drive- through lanes to prevent vehicles from blocking drive aisle and stacking along Druid Road. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. 8. Comment: All of the above to be addressed prior to a DO. Response: Acknowledged. Planning Comment: The response provided to General Applicability Criterion #2 is confusing. The first sentence in the response begins to address the criteria but does not say HOW the proposed bank will not hinder or discourage development of adjacent land or significantly impair the value thereof. The balance of the response is associated with a lot split that is not referenced anywhere else in the application or on the proposed plans. Please provide an adequate response to criterion #2 and provide clarification as to the "lot split." Response: Please see attached revised response to criterion #2. As to the lot split, this is not applicable to the proposed project and has been removed from the response. Comment: If freestanding signs are proposed to be installed at the northwest and southwest corners of the property, as would appear to be depicted on the plans, the sign could only be 30" in height as they would be located in sight visibility triangles. As such, the signs would then be obscured by the proposed landscaping. Also, please be advised that in order to have ©' Q F two (2) freestanding signs, a Comprehensive Sign Program would need to be approved for the property. Response: Please reference revised Sheet C1. ?oe Comment: Clarify why a portion of the existing sidewalk along Pine Street is being retained where a new sidewalk is being constructed immediately adjacent thereto. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 8 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs • www.interplanoriando.com INTERPLAN LLC • ORIGINAL #CEIVED MAR 0 6 2006 AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments pLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 9 CITY OF CLEARWATER Comment: The two (2) halves of the northernmost east/west drive aisle intersecting Xle the Pine Street ingress/egress point do not line up with one another. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. Comment: Provide clarification as to how the proposed angled parking spaces along the east side of the property meet the dimensional standards of Section 3-1402 A. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1, angled parking is no longer being proposed. Comment: Please be advised that the standard parking space dimension is 9'x 18'. As such, it is recommended that the drawings be revised to adjust and incorporate the excess pavement into the surrounding landscape areas as applicable. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. -` 7. Comment: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, buildings on corner lots should emphasize such a prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or 11?1? other distinguishing features. It is envisioned through this redevelopment standard that buildings on corner lots would be located at the corner of the lot rather than at the center of the lot and that building mass would further emphasize this location, It is strongly recommended that the building and site be redesigned so as to locate the building at one of the two corners of the site. Response: The proposed development emphasizes its prominent corner location through the use of additional height, massing as well as distinctive architectural treatments and theme as required per the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The bank building location is such that it will allow the proper functioning and circulation of traffic for everyday business. The use of the six (6) foot decorative screen wall has been used to mask the required parking and give the impression of building structure and mass across the entire width of the street frontage including at the corners of the lot. The proposed development will add character and significantly aide in the redevelopment of Downtown Clearwater. Comment: There are numerous overhead utilities on site. Clarify how these utilities will be rerouted through the site and to any adjacent properties that they may serve. Response: Please reference sheet C1.1. The overhead utilities on site do not serve any other property and will be removed. ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 9 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs - www.interplanoriando.com RECEIVED INTERPLAN LLC • • MAR 0 6 2006 AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT Response to Comments CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 10 Comment: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Solid fences and walls provided along rights-of-way shall typically not exceed three feet (3') in height. Where any portion of the fence or wall exceeds three feet (3') in height, it must be at least 50% open. Provide clarification as to how the proposed six foot (6) high screen wall meets this standard. Response: Please reference new Sheet A1.0 which includes a street elevation and site wall details 3& 4. 00 Comment: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, clarify how the proposed development is consistent with the desired vision of the character district with regard to ground coverage by the building. Response: The AmSouth Bank development is consistent with the desired vision of the character district with regard to ground coverage by the building and accomplishes this vision primarily through its substantial size as well as through design efforts that have been fashioned to give the illusion of massing/coverage across the entire parcel. The use of the six (6) foot decorative screen wall has been used to add character, mask the required parking and give the impression of building structure and mass/coverage across the entire width of the street frontage including at the corners of the lot. Comment: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, clarify how the proposed building maintains the location pattern of buildings for a distance of two (2) blocks (including both sides of the street). Response: After observation of the area surrounding the proposed development site for a distance of two (2) blocks along S. Fort Harrison, a distinct pattern cannot be established. Building location varies from parcel to parcel. For example, the newly constructed Bank at the corner of Pine and South Fort Harrison immediately adjacent to the AmSouth sit Is not located at the corner of the property nor does the building directly abut S. Fort Harrison or give the feeling of massing or significant ground coverage. However, the AmSouth Bank development is proposed to be directly abutting S. Fort Harrison and efforts have been exuded to give the illusion of massing/coverage across the entire parcel in addition to the massing provided by the bank building itself. n: Comment: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the use of exterior insulated finish systems (EIFS) on the first three (3) floors of the building exterior is deemed inappropriate as it is not a durable material. Response: Please reference Sheets A2.1 & A2.2 which have been revised to indicate stucco with a paint finish for the main building finish treatment. 's e ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 10 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com INTERPLAN LLC • AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 11 ORIGINAL • RECEIVED MAR 0 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Comment: Note #6 on the proposed roof plan (Sheet Al. 3) states that the "flat roof area is recessed below the surrounding parapet to screen roof top HVAC equipment." Specify the dimension of this recess. Response: Please reference Sheet A1.3 which has been revised to include elevation notes for the top of the parapet and top of roof deck. ,1f4?' Comment: With regard to the walkway along the south side of the building, a portion Comment: The proposed site plan (Sheet Cl) depicts a screen wall in front of the of the walkway extends between the outer wall of the stairwell and the adjacent parking spaces, The partial walkway segment is unnecessary and should be replaced with landscaping. Response: Please reference revised sheet Cl. proposed a/c equipment at the south side of the building. Clarify the height of this proposed screen wall. Additionally, revise the architectural elevations to reflect this provision of the screen wall. Response: Please reference Sheet A2.1 & A2.2 which have been revised to include the screen wall for the mechanical equipment. Reference Sheet A1.0 for the screen wall details. Comment: Pursuant to Section 3-904, sight visibility triangles are required to be provided at all street or driveway intersections. Further, within these sight visibility triangles, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level of 30 inches and eight feet above grade. Sheets C1 and L1 do not depict the required sight visibility triangles where South Fort Harrison Avenue intersects Druid Road and Pine Street. Also, the proposed six foot high screen wall encroaches into two of the required sight visibility triangles. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. Comment: The proposed roof plan (Sheet A1.3) depicts six (6) roof mounted a/c units. In addition, three (3) ground level a/c units are depicted at the south side of the building. Clarify if all nine (9) a/c units are actually proposed for this building. Response: All units indicated are intended to be used. The condensing units on the ground will service ground floor air handling units. The units on the roof will handle the second floor. yl Comment: The roof overhangs into the North Fort Harrison Avenue right-of-way by approximately two feet (2'). While this is allowable pursuant to Section 3- 908.A,1, as this is still a FDOT right-of-way, approval for the overhang encroachment will also be necessary from the State, Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 11 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs - www.interplanoriando.com INTERPLAN LLC AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater ORIGINAL Response to Comments RECEIVED Page 12 Other MAR 0 6 2006 1. Comment: No Comments. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Response: Informational. CITY OF CLEARWATER Notes: This application has been deemed insufficient. Please resubmit revised plans and application package on or before noon, Monday, March 6th, 2006 for review by the DRC on Thursday, March 30th, 2006. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information, If I am not available, Rick Krietemeyer is the Civil Program Manager or and will be able to answer your questions, Sincerely, INTERPLAN LLC ..1. pal? Amanda Bordner Project Manager/Site Development Attachments cc: T. Tobin, CBRE; G. Neblock, Interplan, LLC; R, Krietemeyer, U. Branstetter, Interplan, LLC; File ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 12 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs • www.interplanorlando.com Conditions Associated With FLS2005-11087 y? S 715 S FT HARRISON AVE Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4773 01/11/2006 1. According to city sanitary atlas a sewer lateral is presently existing about 55-feet east of Not Met manhole in Druid Road. Developer is encouraged to utilize existing lateral if practicable to avoid open cutting roadway. 2. Fire Condition Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3062 01/18/2006 Fire Alarm to be installed per NFPA 72 (acknowledge prior to D.O) (JFK) Not Met 01/18/2006 Show that the pavers that are being used will support the weight of fire appartus at 80,000 lbs. ( Not Met Acknowledge prior to D.O.) ( JFK) 01/18/2006 Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300' of building as hose lays and Not Met on same side of street as building. PRIOR TO DO 01/18/2006 Provide 30 foot radius for ingress on north and south entrance. (Prior to D.O ) (JFK) Not Met Harbor Master Condition Robert Tefft 562-4539 01/19/2006 No issues. Not Met Landscape Robert Tefft 562-4539 01/18/2006 Pursuant to Section 3-1202.6.1, shade trees must be planted a minimum of five feet (5') from any Not Met impervious area. Several of the Live Oak trees proposed will be in conflict with this requirement. Revise the landscape plan accordingly. 01/18/2006 Pursuant to Section 3-1202.13.4, where 50 or more trees are provided, a minimum of five (5) Not Met species of tree shall incorporated. Further, each species shall constitute a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of trees. 01/18/2006 Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1, where the parking spaces provided exceed 110% of the required Not Met parking, the interior landscape islands shall constitute 12% of the square footage of the gross vehicular use area. The submitted landscape calculations must be revised to reflect the above (an incorrect percentage is used on the plans). In addition, the plan depicts the intended locations of the 5,136 square feet of required interior landscape island; however approximately 2,596 square feet of this is actually perimeter landscaping. 01/18/2006 Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1, shrubs shall constitute 50% of the required greenspace. The Not Met landscape calculations submitted do not provide any indication as to meeting the criteria. 01/18/2006 Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building Not Met facade with frontage along a right-of-way within a minimum five foot (6) wide landscaped area composed of at least two (2) accent trees or three (3) palms for every 40 linear feet of building . facade and one (1) shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. The development proposal is inconsistent with the above as it does not meet the required minimum landscape area width along the west facade of the building, and the area does not include any accent trees or palms. 01/19/2006 Provide landscaping on both sides of the ingress/egress point drive aisles that is consistent with Not Met one another. 01/19/2006 The paved areas directly in front of the angeled parking spaces on the east side of the property Not Met should be incorporated into the landscaping for the site. 01/19/2006 The landscaping proposed at the northwest and southwest corners of the property should, as per Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 01/20/2006 Page 1 of 4 C1 FLS2005-11087 715 S FT HARRISON AVE • Landscape Robert Tefft 562-4539 the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, be used as a design element and define the urban setting. 01/19/2006 On the north side of the walkway adjacent to the north side of the proposed building there is a Not Met landscape island. What is proposed to be planted in the island? Legal Condition Robert Tefft 562-4539 01/19/2006 No issues. Not Met Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 01/18/2006 Prior to issuance of a building permit: Not Met 1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit 2) Obtain a r.o.w. permit from the City of Clearwater to construct the off site storm pipe extension. 3) Obtain a permit from Pinellas County to open cut the Pinellas Trail to construct the proposed storm pipe. 4) All offsite storm pipes are to be Reinforced Concrete Pipe with the joints wrapped per city criteria. 5) Provide a cross-section through pond in N-S and E-W directions, extend to r.o.w. and property lines. Show design high,normal and water quality level in one of the cross sections. 6) Provide engineering analysis demonstrating that seepage will not occur through pond banks. 7) Provide additional topography for adjacent property up to 50 feet off the property lines. Plan sheet C-3 is of poor print quality to interpret offsite information. In order to facilitate review at the building permit stage it is recommended that the two copies that go to City Engineering be CAD copies. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 01/17/2006 Provide a Traffic Impact Study since project generates 100 or more new vehicle trips per hour. Not Met (Development Code Section: 4-801). A TIA was submitted for our review back in June 24, 2004 for a proposed 9,184 sq.ft. AmSouth bank by Traffic Planning and Design , Inc.. The applicant may submit a revised TIA for our review,however please set up a scoping meeting with Traffic Operation's Division before conducting the TIA. 2. Provide necessary improvements to bring affected roadway network to the City's acceptable level of service (LOS) per Traffic Impact Study or as determined by Traffic Operation's Manager or designee. (Development Code Section: 4-802 & 4-803) 3. Provide the angle in degrees for the angled parking spaces and comply to current City parking dimensions. 4. Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the Druid Road/Fort Harrison Avenue and Pine Street/Fort Harrison Ave intersections. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 5. Show location of any mast arm column and signal cabinet. Applicant's structure(s) must not interfere with signal cabinet and mast arm column. 6. For five- drive through lanes they must be able to accommodate 22 vehicles without impeding drive aisles or parking spaces. 7. Re-design drive through lanes to prevent vehicles from blocking drive aisle and stacking along Druid Road. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. General Applicability Criteria #2 Robert Tefft 562-4539 Print Date: 01120/2006 CaseConditons Page 2 of 4 • • FLS2005-11087 General Applicability Criteria #2 715 S FT HARRISON AVE Robert Tefft 562-4539 01/19/2006 The response provided to General Applicability Criterion #2 is confusing. The first sentence in the Not Met response begins to address the criteria, but does not say HOW the proposed bank will not hinder or discourage development of adjacent land or significantly impair the value thereof. The balance of the response is associated with a lot split that is not referenced anywhere else in the application or on the proposed plans. Please provide an adequate response to criterion #2 and provide clarification as to the "lot split". Zoning Condition Robert Tefft 562-4539 01/06/2006 Pursuant to Section 3-904, sight visibility triangles are required to be provided at all street or Not Met driveway intersections. Further, within these sight visibility triangles no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches and eight feet above grade. Sheets C1 and L1 do not depict the required sight visibility triangles where South Forth Harrison Avenue intersects Druid Road and Pine Street. Also, the proposed six-foot high screen wall encroaches into two of the required sight visibility triangles. 01/19/2006 Provide clarification as to how the proposed angled parking spaces along the east side of the Not Met property meet the dimensional standards of Section 3-1402.A. 01/19/2006 Pursuant to the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, where between 76 and 100 Not Met parking spaces are provided, four (4) of those spaces shall be handicap accessible. Only three (3) of the 83 parking spaces proposed are handicap accessible parking spaces. 01/19/2006 Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, solid fences and walls provided Not Met along rights-of-way shall typically not exceed three feet (3') in height. Where any portion of the fence or wall exceeds three feet (3') in height, it must be at least 50% open. Provide clarification as to how the proposed six foot (6) high screen wall meets this standard. 01/19/2006 Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, clarify how the proposed building Not Met maintains the location pattern of buildings for a distance of two blocks (including both sides of the street). 01/19/2006 Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, clarify how the proposed Not Met development is consistent with the desired vision of the character district with regard to ground coverage by the building. 01/19/2006 Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, buildings on corner lots should Not Met emphasize such a prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. It is envisioned through this redevelopment standard that buildings on corner lots would be located at the corner of the lot, rather than at the center of the lot and that building mass would further emphasize this location. It is strongly recommended that the building and site is redesigned so as to locate the building at one of the two corners of the site. 01/19/2006 Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the use of exterior insulated finish Not Met systems (EIFS) on the first three (3) floors of building exteriors is deemed inappropriate as it is not a durable material. 01/19/2006 The proposed site plan (sheet Cl) depicts a screen wall in front of the proposed a/c equipment at Not Met the south side of the building. Clarify the height of this proposed screen wall. Additionally, revise the architectural elevations to reflect the provision of the screen wall. 01/19/2006 The proposed roof plan (sheet A1.3) depicts six (6) roof mounted a/c units. In addition, three (3) Not Met ground level a/c units are depicted at the south side of the building. Clarify if all nine (9) a/c units are actually proposed for this building. 01/19/2006 Note #6 on the proposed roof plan (sheet A1.3) states that the "flat roof area is recessed below Not Met the surrounding parapet to screen roof top HVAC equipment." Specify the dimension of this Print Date: 01/20/2006 CaseConditons Page 3 of 4 0 0 FLS2005-11087 715 S FT HARRISON AVE Zoning Condition Robert Tefft 562-4539 recess. 01/19/2006 With regard to the walkway along the south side of the building, a portion of the walkway extends Not Met between the outerwall of the stairwell and the adjacent parking spaces. The partial walkway segment is uneccessary and should be replaced with landscaping. 01/19/2006 The two (2) halves of the northernmost east/west drive aisle intersecting the Pine Street Not Met ingress/egress point do not line-up with one another. 01/19/2006 Please be advised that the standard parking spaces dimension is 9'x 18'. As such, it is Not Met recommended that the drawings are revised to adjust and incorporate the excess pavement into the surrounding landscape areas as applicable. 01/19/2006 Clarify why a portion of the existing sidewalk along Pine Street is being retained where a new Not Met sidewalk is being constructed immediately adjacent thereto. 01/19/2006 If freestanding signs are proposed to be installed at the northwest and southwest corners of the Not Met property as would appear to be depicted on the plans, the sign could only be 30" in height as they would be located within sight visibility triangles. As such, the signs would then be obscured by the proposed landscaping. Also, please be advised that in order to have two freestanding signs, a Comprehensive Sign Program would need to be approved for the property. 01/20/2006 "ENGINEERING" Not Met There are numerous overhead utilities on site. Clarify how these utilities will be rerouted through the site and to any adjacent properties that they may serve. Print Date: 01/20/2006 CaseConditons Page 4 of 4 • 0 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW December 29, 2005 Mr. Michael Boo Interplan, LLC 933 Lee Road, I" Floor Orlando, FL 32810 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Re: FLS2005-11087 - 715 South Fort Harrison Avenue - Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Boo: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLS2005-11087. Following a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, February 2, 2006, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, I-? -0? Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYf HAMILTON, COUNCII NIEAIBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" • 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER LL r! ? ' - PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° ' arwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: December 29, 2005 Michael Boo, Interplan, (407) 629-9124 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLS2005-11087 - 715 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefft@mvclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** Dec. 29 2005 09:06AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 914076299124 Dec.29 09:05AM 00'54 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-73291. INTCRPLAN 933 LEE ROAD, FIRST FLOOR ORLANDO, FL 32810 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 December 13, 2005 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Fl- 33756 727-562-4539 • Reference: AmSouth Bank - 715 S. Fort Harrison Avenue, Clearwater, FL Case #: FLS2005-1 1 08 7 IP#/AmSouth ID: 2003.0608/ FLWC03078RL Response to Letter of Incompleteness Comments Dear Mr. Tefft: Please accept the following in response to comments dated November 8, 2005: 1. Comment: Pursuant to Section D of the Flexible Standard Development Application, a response to the applicable Flexibility Criteria is required [ref,: Section 2- 903.N.]. Please note that the development proposal indicates a proposed height of 33'-11 ", which is an increase upon the standard height of 30'. Response: The height was increased to develop the desired historical architectural massing requested by earlier Planning and Zoning reviews for the Ft. Harrison Corridor. 2. Comment: Pursuant of Section E of the Flexible Standard Development Application, a copy of the permit inquiry letter or SWFWMD permit submittal is required to accompany the Flexible Standard Development application. Response: Acknowledged. Reference the attached SWFWMD ERP Application. 3. Comment: Pursuant to Section F of the Flexible Standard Development Application, provide a signed and sealed survey. The survey provided with the application was not signed and sealed. Response: Reference the attached signed and sealed survey. ARCHITECTURE ¦ ENGINEERING ¦ PROJECT MANAGEMENT ¦ INTERIOR DESIGN ¦ AA 003420 ¦ CA 8660 F:\A-J\AmSoufh\2003.0608\Correspondences\030608pmt12Q84MDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Facie I development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs • www.interplanonando.com INTERPLAN LLC • • AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 2 4. Comment: Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Standard Development Application, depict the locations of all public and private easements on the site plan. Many of the existing easements depicted are not legible. Also, the 10-foot drainage/utility easement depicted on sheet C1 scales at 30 feet. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. 5. Comment: Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Standard Development Application, depict the location of all existing public and private utilities (i.e. fire hydrants, storm/sanitary sewer lines, manholes, lift stations, and gas and water lines). Response: Please reference revised sheet C2. 6. Comment: Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Standard Development Application, the site data table is required to denote the Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) of the development proposal. Response: Please reference revised sheet CO, Site Data table. 7. Comment: Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Standard Development Application, provide dimensions for the proposed building, Response: Please reference revised sheet C1, detail 1. 8. Comment: Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Standard Development Application, depict the proposed structural overhangs on the site plan. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1, note tag number 31. 9. Comment: Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Standard Development Application, provide dimensions for all landscape islands on the landscape plan. Response: Please reference revised L1 sheet for added dimensions. 10. Comment: Pursuant to Section I of the Flexible Standard Development Application, provide building elevation drawings (i.e. black and white line drawings). Response: Please reference the fifteen (15) sets of building elevation drawings, signed and sealed, that are enclosed with this submittal. 11. Comment: Exhibit "A" to the Warranty Deed is incomplete. It appears as if the final line to the first page of the exhibit was cropped during copying. Response: Acknowledged. Please reference attached Warranty Deed. 12. Comment: The site data table identifies the zoning as Central Business District (CBD). This is the Future Land Use Plan category. The actual zoning is Downtown (D). Response: Please reference revised sheet CO, Site Data table. ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 2 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com INTERPLAN LLC • • AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater Response to Comments Page 3 13. Comment: Please revise the site dimension plan (sheet C1) to limit the number of notations to that which is absolutely necessary, or provide a separate / specific site plan with all applicable dimensions. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. 14. Comment: The development plans denote two different streets along the south property line - Druid Road and Wallace Street. Please clarify. Response: Please reference revised sheet C1. 15. Comment: The total floor area proposed (15,000 square feet) is being calculated as impervious in relation to the site, However, only the footprint of the building can be included in the calculation. Response: Please reference revised sheet CO, Site Data table. 16. Comment: Provide color samples (i.e. color chips) of the proposed building colors. Response: Please refer to the copies of the color palette. 17. Comment: Provide floor plans and a roof plan for the development proposal. Response: Please reference the fifteen (15) signed and sealed sets of floor plans (sheets A1.1, A1.2), roof plan (A1.3) and building elevations (A2.1, A2.2.) that are enclosed with this submittal. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. If I am not available, Rick Krietemeyer is the Civil Engineering Program Manager and will be able to answer your questions. Sincerely, INTERPLAN LLC Michael B o Permit Coordinator/Site Development Attachments cc: G. Harris, T. Tobin, G, Neblock, Rick Krietemeyer, U. Branstetter, IP File ORLANDO DALLAS CHICAGO ATLANTA Page 3 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs - www.interplanorlando.com INTERPLAN 933 LEE ROAD, FIRST FLOOR ORLANDO, FL 32810 PH 407.645.5008 FX 407.629.9124 10 i TRANSMITTAL City of Clearwater Planning Department 2003.0608/ FLWC03078RL TO PROJECT NO. 100 South Myrtle Avenue December 13, 2005 DATE Clearwater, Florida 33756 Hand Carry WE ARE SENDING VIA Mr. Robert G. Tefft 727-562-4539 ATTENTION AmSouth Bank - Downtown Clearwater TELEPHONE PROJECT EMAIL ADDRESS DRC Site Review Re-submittal SUBJECT COPIES SETS DATE DESCRIPTION Revised Plans (signed and sealed) Elevations and Floor Plans and Roof Plans (s/s) Application Comment Response Letter Warranty Deed Survey (s/s) SWFWMD Application 1 Color Samples REMARKS Mr. Tefft, Please find enclosed the required information needed for you review of the above mentioned project. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 407-645-5008. If I am not available, Rick Krietemeyer is the Civil Program Manger and will be able to assist you. Thank you. Michael Boo G. Harris, T. Tobin, G. Neblock, R. Krietemeyer, U. Branstetter, File BY cc F:\A-MmSouth\2003.0608\Transmlttals\030608tra42.doc ARCHITECTURE ¦ ENGINEERING ¦ PROJECT MANAGEMENT ¦ INTERIOR DESIGN ¦ AA 003420 • CA 8660 development services for restaurant, retail, hospitality and commercial programs ¦ www.interplanorlando.com 9 • LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW November 8, 2005 Mr. Michael Boo Interplan, LLC 933 Lee Road, 1St Floor Orlando, FL 32810 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 Re: FLS2005-11087 - 715 South Fort Harrison Avenue - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Boo: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLS2005-11087. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: Pursuant to Section D of the Flexible Standard Development Application, a response to the applicable Flexibility Criteria is required [ref.: Section 2-903.N.]. Please note that the development proposal indicates a proposed height of 33'-11 ", which is an increase upon the standard height of 30'. < Pursuant to Section E of the Flexible Standard Development Application, a copy of the permit inquiry letter 11 or SWFWMD permit submittal is required to accompany the Flexible Standard Development application. 4 Pursuant to Section F of the Flexible Standard Development Application, provide a signed and sealed survey. The survey provided with the application was not signed and sealed. ,tl? Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Standard Development Application, depict the locations of all public and private easements on the site plan. Many of the existing easements depicted are not legible. Also, the 10-foot drainage/utility easement depicted on sheet C1 scales at 30 feet. Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Standard Development Application, depict the location of all existing 45 public and private utilities (i.e. fire hydrants, strom/sanitary sewer lines, manholes, lift stations, and gas and water lines). 0 Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Standard Development Application, the site date table is required to denote the Floor Area Ration (F.A.R.) of the development proposal. --7'. Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Standard Development Application, provide dimensions for the proposed building. ,-8° Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Standard Development Application, depict the proposed structural overhangs on the site plan. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HoYI' 1-L IAILTON, COUNCILNIEXIBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" • • ' Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Standard Development Application, provide dimensions for all landscape islands on the landscape plan. J-Y' Pursuant to Section I of the Flexible Standard Development Application, provide building elevation drawings (i.e. black and white line drawings). Exhibit "A" to the warranty deed is incomplete. It appears as if the final line to the first page of the exhibit was croped during copying. The site data table identifies the zoning as Central Business District (CBD). This is the Future Land Use Plan category. The actual zoning is Downtown (D). ,jl? Please revise the site dimension plan (sheet C 1) to limit the number of notations to that which is absolutely necessary, or provide a seperate/specific site plan will all applicable dimensions. 44' The development plans denote two different streets along the south property line - Druid Road and Wallace Street. Please clarify. 45' The total floor area proposed (15,000 square feet) is being calculated as impervious in relation to the site. However, only the footprint of the building can be included in the calculation. Provide color samples (i.e. color chips) of the proposed building colors. Provide floor plans and a roof plan for the development proposal. Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 3:00 P.M., Thursday, November 10, 2005. . Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefftna.mvclearwatencom. Sincerely yours, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 • • CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater } 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~_ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 ° TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: November 8, 2005 Michael Boo, Interplan, (407) 629-9124 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLS2005-11087 - 715 South Fort Harrison Avenue Number of Pages (Including Cover Sheet): 3 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via a-mail at: robert.tefft ,mycleanvater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** Nov. 08 2005 02:59PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 914076299124 Nov.08 02:57PM 01'53 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). I _j LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW January 12, 2006 i 40 I T Y C OF C L E A K VY A T E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 715 SOUTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE (FLS2005-11087) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 715 South Fort Harrison Avenue, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development to establish a bank with attached drive-thru facility (Retail Sales and Service) within the Downtown (D) District, pursuant to Section 2-902.N. On February 2, 2006, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be February 2, 2006. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at (727) 562-4539, via e-mail at robert.tefft@Myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case, which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on February 2, 2006. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater - Planning Department Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.teffl@inyclearwater. coin FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICF-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL\1ENiBER HOYC HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER CARI.FN A. PETERSFN, COUNCILNIEMBER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATm ACTION EMPLOYER" 0 • LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW January 12, 2006 C ITY OF C LEARWAT ER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 715 SOUTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE (FLS2005-11087) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 715 South Fort Harrison Avenue, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development to establish a bank with attached drive-thru facility (Retail Sales and Service) within the Downtown (D) District, pursuant to Section 2-902.N. On February 2, 2006, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be February 2, 2006. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at (727) 562-4539, via e-mail at robert.tefft(omyclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case, which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent. substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on February 2, 2006. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Cify of Clearwater - Planning Department Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert. teffl ac invclearwater. coin FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL MEMBER HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLF,N A. PEITRSI.N, COUNCII.\IF\IBFR "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATm, ACTION EMPLOYER" 0 Lp,#? CITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT N "YlE?rrrr'0.n???1 POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 j 4TEQ, ` y MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx(727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW January 12, 2006 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 715 SOUTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE (FLS2005-11087) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 715 South Fort Harrison Avenue, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development to establish a bank with attached drive-thru facility (Retail Sales and Service) within the Downtown (D) District, pursuant to Section 2-902.N. On February 2, 2006, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be February 2, 2006. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at (727) 562-4539, via e-mail at robert.tefft(cDmyclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case, which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent. substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on February 2, 2006. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater - Planning Department Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert. tefft ainvclearwater. corn FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIENIEMBER HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCII.MrMBER CARI.EN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAI. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVI? ACTION EMPI.OI I:R" • 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW January 12, 2006 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 715 SOUTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE (FLS2005-11087) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 715 South Fort Harrison Avenue, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development to establish a bank with attached drive-thru facility (Retail Sales and Service) within the Downtown (D) District, pursuant to Section 2-902.N. On February 2, 2006, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be February 2, 2006. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at (727) 562-4539, via e-mail at robert.tefft@myclear-vvater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case, which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on February 2, 2006. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater - Planning Department Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.tefft&nvclearwater.coin FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMENIBER HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCIINEM13ER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCIId1EMBER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AI FIRMATMi ACTION EMPLOYI`R" Fz- s aoa,? - 11687 WINTERS, ELISE K 609 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5314 FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF CLEARWATER INC 411 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5328 C K S ENTERPRISES 1696 N HERCULES AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1929 PARKS, ERIC D PARKS, RENEE A 714 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5304 PINELLAS DENTAL ARTS C/O PINELLAS DENTAL ARTS PA 650 E TARPON AVE TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 MC CLURE, MICHAEL W MC CLURE, SANDRA K 2210 DONATO DR BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3433 Clwr Neighborhoods Coalition President Mr. Doug Williams 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, F133761 1?„n SD u 7ff OSEUFERT, DENISE A BRUNVAND, BJORN E 615 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5314 PARKA, JORGE E VARELA, GLADYS 40946 US HIGHWAY 19 N TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 5446 TURNER, AMBER V TURNER, GERALDINE C 801 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 FULLER, JOYCE E THE 639 PONCE DE LEON BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1018 DEXTER PROPERTIES 612 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 0 )e - f- DEXTER PROPERTIES 612 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 MINES, JONATHAN MINES, CARLEN 505 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3909 Harbor Oaks Assoc. 301 Druid Rd West Clearwater, Florida 33756 FLS2005-11087 AM South RESNIK, ROBERT *DRUID ROAD *DEXTER PROPERTIES 3517 SHORELINE CIR 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 612 DRUID RD E PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1727 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3948 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 WHITEHOUSE, STEWART M SR WHITEHOUSE, ETHEL L 603 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5314 MC KEOWN, RUTH E THE 432 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3817 DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3948 PARKS, ERIC D PARKS, RENEE A 714 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5304 A E M ERFAHRUNG C/O CORROS INC 1000 BRICKELL AVE STE 920 MIAMI FL 33131 - DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3948 HAMMESFAHR FAMILY LAND TRUST 600 DRUID RD ' CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 DIMMITT CAR LEASING INC 25191 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2102 MC GOWAN, H J III MC GOWAN, GAYLE K 414 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5329 WALLACE, WILLIAM D THE WALLACE, JOHN L 606 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5315 A E M ERFAHRUNG C/O CORROS INC 1000 BRICKELL AVE STE 920 MIAMI FL 33131 - C K S ENTERPRISES 1696 N HERCULES AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1929 A E M ERFAHRUNG C/O CORROS INC 1000 BRICKELL AVE STE 920 MIAMI FL 33131 - R 0 E C CLUB INC 607 INDIANA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5306 DEXTER PROPERTIES 612 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 DIMMITT, LARRY CADILLAC 25191 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2102 SOUTHTRUST BANK 220 WILDWOOD PKWY BIRMINGHAM AL 35209 - 7801 DIMMITT, LARRY CADILLAC INC 25191 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2102 HARRITY, MICHELLE 803 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 Page 1 of 1 10 / 29 / 15 / 94026 / 004 / 0010 08-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:41:36 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales AMSOUTH BANK OBK: 13646 OPG: 2040 3000 GALLERIA TOWER STE i BIRMINGHAM AL 35244-2315 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 509 PIN E ST of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.02 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (qual/Unlit) Vac/Imp Plat Information 6 /2,004 13,64612,040 3,000,000 (M) I 1905: Book OH3 Pgs 006- 8 /2,002 12,18612,218 158,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 3 /1,991 7,520/1,267 168,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,978 4,735/1,748 22,500 (U) I 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS ,rust/Market: 830,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 830,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 830,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 19,286.88 1} 0 x 0 12. 00 21, 100. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 6.50 60, 777. 00 S 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 19, 286.88 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 19, 286. 88 Short Legal WALLACE'S ADD BLK 4, LO TS i THRU 6 & N Description 52FT OF LOT 7 & N 1/2 OF UAC ALLEY S OF LOTS 1-3 & http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gif?p=16+29+15+94626+004+0010&0=1 11/8/2005 0 16 / 29 / 15 / 0 Page 1 of 1 94020 / 004 / 0010 :01 08-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:41:35 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Pre-Engineered Metal Property Address: 509 PINE ST Prop Use: 343 Land Use: 27 S?ruc?ural Elements Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Prefinished Metal Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Rigid Frame Roof Frame Steel Truss & Purlin Roof Cover Corrugated Metal Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Ceiling Fin Only Min Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 2 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,980 Effective Age 20 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 13,920 7) .00 0 2) Office Area 1.75 300 8) .00 0 3) 00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C omm ?r c i a l E x t r a F e a-t ur e s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year 1) ASPHALT 190X157 1.50 29,830 44,750 44,750 999 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 44,750 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbin/cgi-gifl?p=16+29+15+94626+004+0010+01 &o=1 &t=3 11/8/2005 F6?,`cir`. CITY OF CLI?.ARW.ATER 9"0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr OFFICE Box 4748 ,9TEA. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 a z 0co ? m Q, rn m p M m Grp o O m ? m m ?ljAz ; -4 2 JA4*06 f- u? E -?a A E M ERFAHR C/O CORROS 1000 BR IC LL AVE STE 920 MIAMI F 33131 - ?3s-?s?a?so?-a4 cqa?, 126411 U.S. POSTAGE _'=47rK CITY OF CLEARWATER •?` -= ?? PLANNING DEPARMNr ATER; ' POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 - V_ r Q _-J MIAMI F 33131 ra, ? ?"r '? 13os ,•? .. 3 tl_8 A E M ERFAHR C/ RROS 1000 BRI AVE STE 920 112641 u u 1 _.: w a ?t- o Q N WwM °a: d ca co ?U) W LL ° a S.POSTA E # ) z r3 3 1 3 1 i 3 U Ct 3 ?l tel. D ?3 ? ? ?lti }3f lF tftlt f}t;!ili:iii{if'.dlt t3l :f3lSFitf'lifilti5iul h>E?'ai?; CITY OF CLI?ARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 4 t v A E ERFAH C/O C O 1000 BRIC MIAMI 331 G AVE STE 920 jso e )rI w0.308 POSTAGE ,_j z z a: LLJ c0 O Q w?3 ?wcr ? w>-j ca cr U (0) z ?' o z U-i s Q C) K