Loading...
FLD2005-07073Planning rtment t Avenue 100 Sout Clearwater, Florri da 33756 (.1 Telephone: 727-562-4567 0 j Fax: 727-562-4865 tJ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION 0 SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans O SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ DA RECEIVED: L„ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: vre?v?u?lt!t. NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) E FIVE[) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIM Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04-05-05) PLANNING DEPART ENT PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT" CITY OF CLEARWATER A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: ?77;?/C A e_ 6 A n b PjAI 46 MAILING ADDRESS: 2 0 7 % A", AU,1 AP AVX. eLl'k&W/QT k-L 3376-6- PHONE NUMBER: :2 ?6 (P _57 FAX NUMBER: -7 Z_yy? PROPERTY OWNER(S): (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: ?0 % 910 AZ. . 4!!? 5_54*24011 .,??? t -z 73 PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: ?9? ?7 5 CELL NUMBER: P©" ! 3 E-MAIL ADDRESS: G PO,ilq f !V eel' i tAq q? a o t ehy B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: ©?g i f/J fin/ y'? el-909UM"I f-C i LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: f)-Q1? L? tee f ( / O Sr? D n ? ? / PARCEL SIZE: ?, (acres, square feeti "p )3o f) L PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: _/? ?fD,{G Q , (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): AdtS `y " p ( SeGteAl ?'aC/T Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations: e.g. reduction in requi red number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) aecerr OPIQ7INAl RECEIVED Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- Kt Vf 0E2r?8% PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE TH NSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A VIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY AP rMVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) GRIGINAI C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT Ai;k rI"?RSHIP (see Yage 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) CITY OF CLF-A 1"` Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which i is located. e v d i e,t F M.!'_ S ?'e. i s ,h '? ?. s o C a-' : a e4 two i t 0.\ O ?J a l re ? i +? L ?,_Il.??,. r* 2v?n v?L?v??t°. tr' S ? Y?+- ?,o Y1 ?1 P rn ?,n Ge . e? g e'?i /?.??G1?5 4.v.gl_J ?t n CON ?.rgo a7 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ? 1 t 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of, persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. ? a2s,? o re`. e J Lim p e,r t o r v, e-A a•-,A i rte St• a t k e. d 6,44 4L le w-L A ? ttee ,, (-r-AY'? ! n £ ?J1 w? C • y?-??'G? Cr'? e .r Cd.iti.e? ?1' t r. t GnX T S + _ fe •SQ..?r,?'? Sfa.?d4ro?5 4. The proposed development is designed to (ninimize tr ffic con estion. ??•to--?aT??S?c lire"??rt ??c ??Stio? '?'• 0.000?Mrv?O??t.?? SE?IE/' ,?? UCK?L ev??CV??t ?.?Q ?3:r11 -4- Qj'Gao SS:A? ??.a.- g??G??I[ 4C60ww?rnda.{?9?t.i C- ?? r•u•B ?C.?. otafP_dLAt 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. `? - its a Rre`NArA w:« -Ae.,A Illc`.ttlvV Surfi2??i-A Law.w#,,tA _ t t i t l a .?. _ +?t c?., wa.? , 6u: 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. % $?retse j w'Ak noft e?je( ays,&4 adis atto-o."t mop ,'-e r, 0L a ct • bud W "M in o? ?e s.?-:v?G vv?a.tir?•? r t 4•C? c?Tke i l_qV ?CNA-ft O%a%.V e,/ t A--t. Ae_v3 tl.a.tiISC-*-f r r?e?06 S tn.. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1 . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. \ tea, &Ak, }:o to A W o k (krc A S to. t? ? •?.. rb it o ..c., A t i.n tun. 1T n. Ir ;lk i,n Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 200 i y oClearwater NOV 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT' 2 The development of the parcel propo or development as a comprehensive infill redev ent project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abut properties. (Include the existing value of the ,*and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) ?? ?? W y w oroflS* -T-- e;?c Lav?ow. i +tP e ?. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. w,. J %L_ol Co,?,t:t O 0&t*A< AnA' • ?n..u t_ 1 ..vorv *1 L, L'.o u"- ??. : n Ci B r'l $ i-E- 'tC !,:l . v c.J 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensiveinfll redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Its..- or*oOStd o!®kiPr* w& "-Lk 'a-Aat at U.0 ti P_...a,o... :,o...Ie T.' A f ( VL A...... t'v u.. b4X a C.i &1 D ?J +?.?! S s-AW - 'tw. oa k a ???vd- ad ?IlW a ,rsi iS 14 . _ of X11 1- 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. I4-ta -I!"% .. 44o ? C wk.T.?. v 7. "The design of the propos d c pre nsive infill redevelopment project creates a form an function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Q ILs_P o_ S c> rO l rr -7? ?: l l IA r ?A_O CL A 10_ W L O IB k -h- , 1`°----w-1 ?--1r .r•.-..•-`4-.. Af f...ll _ "? JJIL. - A^-__- %. - ---- rtt J.. 1.1. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Tom.... Qrepib e..A '&Uer .41 1 .? J -r 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. ravatoe4 -v !'st`if_r1' n tI ,...t AAA^_.i..tl_ .....-e:ka 4.-JrV:w n- a.ILn 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. RECEIVED Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill RedevelopmenO1@2o25-' Ci[}[ ov;; eattr'T PLANNING DEPARTMENT .,,r F , )F CtFAPWATFR 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel propoled for development. A / _ L ^ . i / - _Vh-r ftj)fn OJ /t4J JfA G /?_e QrA19O S " Ofd , JOrY* all d)A &#A .D rr T h e.r n E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBR' 'AL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clea ter Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) 9 0 A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that in, addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. O COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable P Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included _ Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be o ided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; O PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; O GRADING PLAN, as applicable; O PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) l SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ORIGINAL All dimensions; RECEIVED North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ?? 124. Location map; FEB Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; PLANNING D;-:PAR i MEN T Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; CIIY OF t;LFNA WATER All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; RIG! All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, an Rimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wilrfMpal t s, etc; Location of all public and private easements; ??ff ''JJ 2006 Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopmenty9I Qt94R-'-"'' rof Clearwater Location of existing public and p e utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanit- wer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, to*g areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and index #701); _ Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ORIGINAL D REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; REC EKED O FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:2006 One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; FEB DD u Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; _ All open space areas; PLANNING DEPARTMENT Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; CITY OF C:LE.ARWATER Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; _ Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) t/ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) (color rendering if possible); O IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); D COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. ORIGI RECEIVED 111OV 02 2006 Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Re i rn4t"005- City of Clearwater OF CLEARW.ATE?,-? 1. BUILDING ELEVA-i ION PLAN BMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 12.A.23) Required in the event the application i es a development where design standards are i e (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopmen Project or a Residential Infill Project. X_ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/] X 11) (black and white and-color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ORIGINAL RECEIVED ? Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) : ,_ANNf,1ING DEPARTMENT _-y ri ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Cwi;F L1 ARWATER • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. "The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. lV, Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public inistration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. t1 2000 L. SIGNATURE: PLANNING DEF TME€ I CITY OF CLEARWATEP I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this applic n... ,C Signature of prope y owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2-2+x% day of A. D. 20 C S' to me and/or by who is personally known has produced - \ as identification, Notary public, My commission expires: -`%R' ruoLlk -blAIhOFFjIJ Anwar M, Mustafa Commission #DD4 Fx;r Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive In k,l ,. ( ?h6t lB iczagoa8®?a! 'City of Clearwater i?a an c B ding Co,, ;nc, AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGE (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. Tha (I an 1 e are) the owner(s) and record title hotder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ?M R E !C E"; - F - Di,NG od -1.- AjR ©1-7-eg e Q Am 'rj?o 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) X? Q AC/A Z 57_A72f6 AJ 3. That the undersigned as lave) appointed and e9 do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; & That (Itwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ORIGINAL Property Owner RECEIVED C r1 Property Owner FEB 2 4 200b Property Owner PLANNING DEPARTMENT Property Owner CITY OF CLEARWATER STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the.laws of the State of Florida, on this 2 Zd ` day of lea ar G,a"' personally appeared j" who having n fi t duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. ° iOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF FLORID Anwar M. Mustafa-Hasan Notary Public My Commission Expires: Commission # DD438228 3ondcd Thru Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. ORIGINAL R CFl D S 1Pfanning DepadmentOpplication Formsldevelopment reviewlflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc 06 ,?I CLEAf'1:; Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater Planning Ortment Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue >o Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 u :' ??-'?~'?'`?'? -' • Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CAW,#: -t- -E..,1 l? DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE M ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) RECEIVED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIOB 2 4 2006 Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04-05-05) PLANNING DEPARTMENT -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- CITY OF CLEARWATER A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: 'Ok PE6 V .- b '!/?Dzy- 9 ?f7 L A A/I? A V ?i" . G?L4"?}R lA?lg"AFi' kC. .33:75'6' MAILING ADDRESS: r2 011 90 r PHONE NUMBER: :7 2 ?y?'• ?r FAX NUMBER: 7 Z?^I PROPERTY OWNER(S): 2 ;?14px f??I???M1 (Must Include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: f 0 q ?/D Al 64 1 % /r///T . f "L :73 Al 2 PHONE NUMBER: 1913) ff pj7I(D ®O FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: -4 rAP Qe! rq 4_ jQa I?( • en B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A),t STREET ADDRESS of subject site: J? N Xp• ` i LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (if not listed e the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 9KT-'W7;2 L?z C?? l0 40 SO D PARCEL SIZE: 139 96 - _j?ft7? -t', ?zp (acres, square feet) , ` ?f .C' PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 5?+Ff !suereY.. ? 73O ?Q.• (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms o,r square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): A d d 4e• C d t h oe? w, tk q- ,Q S i dcd -lad Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) .4-,C/,&,2n/c a 1/o LWZA a A cc e_s? tip ,`e 1e s Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE NSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PWFVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _X_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) ORIGINAL C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUEIMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT AIFR3T_ RSHIP (see age 6) T P! ANNINe D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) CITY OF CLEARWAIEW Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it k O C 0111 . "04 two t B r-gi ske 2_ \ The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly J impair the value thereof. l , j? -t % . ?- ?"??V Q?. Q i• tA.1P J \ t'?J? b ,? 1r1 b y?. 1 1??S ? ira DP?y W:1i ir4 i.?t 4L.d?4.ca„. orrovio.&tW q",. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. j2 cot! o S? ©re e? C* tAJ:l? per o r w?. &-aL % ^st" L t d 64 a to r<<o? a? L ire ,?. 4?ox't r a t t_ kkiA^? c e V&4. 4 c t 6'e c.,twat e aU l m e-a . S k,I,. fSa?GtY Sfa?.daro?S 4. The proposed development is designed to rnimize tr ffic con estion. ??wR]?ACrOA ?rg?`',s_ ser? ?'• acc.o?.?oda,?? seer __?1?s,? C t? v? e- %r Ac 1. QA V: ?l 1 -4- Q r G e S S 60 a.000ww??nt>! r g«ra?w???,nc?.r? ?t'r: c _? ?e r.a.,4- a or sAp.f{`t? IS !4 ft?q 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Jv .+?1? Surr?4?A Gaw.w?uri? i s we,,? bu,? rar'tMc r ?.?• o- "stF 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. e?'Fec a?,.u ads a.?e..? c?rsoe ?s eC as Qret ri ul.I? no 0..S.Q t: -?y e )%,c-?•ry . 12ML* w??? fin 0. E7eS??:trtr w?a.?.?n?er ZGt.tc '? ? yl??\ S,A• ?.!( ?M A. y? o ? ?.t? ?E? ?.i. hP N?1 ? Aw? Str.0.1? elfl M? ?p?? t? Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1 , The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. ! ?^ A o le • .,. 04-0 n o i ? Std o n 'C ,. s't Q- ???c n . !n? Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater AN& 2. The development of the parcel propo or development as a comprehensive infill redev ent project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) " -v +'r C w??l i crG?1r. EC00,yw..C_ Ireyev`v?C,?e-r C^?-? .? The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 6z &..t Le l S ekr < t t _ S' ?'?a?`.lwo? An '\ ? ?& Xho DAR!! 1 JA Xery e( a11. S tt n.i 4 nA 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. `-N A. p(Apose-J air®:,?r w? p,?cz In POu......PY'P.i sjlb. t%A, aAkkiQd tl+4 1 a 4 tens , --- - 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. . (1 ? 8 S P ? t " & sd ? ?? ?l . e,r? T_ r ? ?e c P .rte - e t.? S? SJ1? •- , E LA0 uA 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel pro o ed for evelopment. a c t t ad?!-A 4 h t ?? ei A O f firl . ` `i ? S?' 6' i f h d i fi 1 d l t t t f f i th t h h 7. n ht crea op gn o e propo c pre nsrve n re eve opmen projec es a orm an unct on a en ances t The des t e community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ` k A U ? Lo i - 1:6 c-C '( W. Af?M A. too- W o s ad d, T I 0 ` 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Ty , OreooS atte`t V?T:\\ Dt-?.?r> CO?VCrni Lr..t i- S ?ort V` .01 61 tM s" I A LO 0 P d t.1 ? 9 ' G? 15C.A SAIL SAL. 6 V'1. 0.1 11PA Q4 ? n R . r ! . 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 9ar/G?r`G ?tePDS dr w S (? ?? -ai?e. - , _ - t +/\?P_ 40 ? l?v? S'?1'+G???Line ?P AGV ?1A . .. , 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. g 4, ?y? -- j e, PispvSyea( f irr ? ; s nod' irr? ;i d er ?t - _ W ? - ..,.- • INAL R6CEIVED 9IA&e"4:64- Page DEPARTMENT 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005-P *1rrtuy?ter.,ER E. STORMWATER2 PLAN SUB*AL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clea0er Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemi to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. 0 At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Val Stormwater plan as noted above is included _ Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be o ided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 5624750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; Y( LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ORIGINAL All dimensions; RECEIVED North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; EB 2 4 2006 Location map; u Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; PLANNING DEPARTMENT Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; CITY OF CLEARWATER All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater Location of existing public and [ 4111111116utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanit wer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ORIGINAL ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) and color rendering if possible; RECEIVED ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: FEB 2 4 2006 Ut! One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; v Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; _ All open space areas; PLANNING DEPARTMENT - Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; CITY OF CLEARWATER _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; - Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) Z/ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y. X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater 1. BQILDING ELEVA"i ION PLAIDBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 1&2.A.23) Required in the event the application in des a development where design standards are in a (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. X_ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/ X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ORIGINAL RECEIVED ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/x X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) PLANNING DEPARTMENT C n,y OF CLEARWATER ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. 'Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. "The 'Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. `, Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this applic n. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS . I Sworn to and subscribed before me this 22--" day of A.D. 20 0'?- to me and/or by who is personally known has produced - - ^ C as identification. _ ?• ' Signature of property owner or representative Notary public, My commission expires: wir?nr rut$LI(,-SIAI'E OF FL "?#' :1r,?tai ' -611 ,3a2z$ Anwar M. MustafaX t `'009 Commission #DD4 Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Ir kjl ??i an E cA?W0006-y City of Clearwater an c tiling Co., Inc. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AG (Narnes of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. Tha (1 a owe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): _ ''T-A.Rt+"V -'?iAI-L'-1]I1J? rf I?I.QAAtA ^_- "7~/1 A4GA / n w.. j dfana e-? G?A?PPy yO&D 4,'s? o f!? 'Al. 1d1KA &)_j0 U 61944W*7", t'L 33 7Sf 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned as ave) appointed and oe do) appoint: AAQXL L?IASS1 r_.. _s,._ . _ _ _ _. .? as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 2 4 2006 pLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before m?la the undersigned, an officer duly commiss 'f),,,,` , '?,- personally appeared Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the My Commission Expires: Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, by the laws of the State of Florida, on this et re ,l t, n"j , ?,, .\ V_ nts of t- havit that he/she signed. ;OTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF FL A Anwar M. Mustafa•Hasan Lj Commission #DD438228 Thin Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. ,2 day of 'who having b- An k ht duly sworn Notary Public , S: kPanning Department Opplication Formsldevelopment reviewlflexible development comprehensive inf ll application 2005.doc Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater 9 4 FLD2005-07073 2099 N HIGHLAND AVE Date Received: 07/01/2005 HAPPY FOODS PLAZA ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 252A PLANNER OF RECORD: R -T CLWCoverSheet Planning Delent 100 r Clearwater Clearwater, Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 U Fax: 727-562-4865 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION t L SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ` SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ I R DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 0? Comprehensive Infll Project (Revised 12/30/2004) ??$ PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: 9 ?^ll 1tlCt i'i p r? 'v/°/s'C'?4??/? L 55 PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: G - Z / ?J 3 PROPERTY OWNER(S): G }/ 7-0 (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) en page 6) AGENT NAME: c.? C,'p0-'S l'<I MAILING ADDRESS: v PHONE NUMBER: 13- U?9 - G FAX NUMBER: u CELL NUMBER: / A E-MAIL ADDRESS: us13A -F e. C' O I- C G m B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A ) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: r"X?'1 `1 N . `?tq `` `- 2 ?,GAGI ttUe • e-tC GCWC?'1?r_ 1° ?.• J?7 ?S LEGAL DESCRIPTION: lec•,-5e 3e E. nne e? G 2 0 '?'le. r1rJn f ? e4Qr G..( G-vJtYtG t (if not listed here, lease no}? the loca )I PARCEL NUMBER: ??'1 / lrS 1 on of this document i the submittal) ©OC?O? ???C? /aSQO PARCEL SIZE: (acres, s ware feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): t (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): -in C-,,V c.- '3U2 ` S?G't IOY\ 1 ?^ `mot - O? cS1 C?e? Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) YQQ'? s1c:•?1ds 0?1.10?,r< ce s s?- veh t e,t e s Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater r' DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TR FER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREY SLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see . page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) r,. Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - E <F r,in how criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage; by ?character of adjacent properties in which it , yt/?i?s?lo?c?a?ted. G ?2 S2 ('V I cc ? ? ?? G.?t yn C'? ??t S I OC.CAi-(c)r-' W'I 1 C. t? reslC.?ence ?- CC?rnmv?-eC5 the t;1JnQcv%ten " ok ae4tnC4 _ cry an r?'Ir"!cnT 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly i th l t f mpa r e va e ere . , _t_ r l1. S C'.CA , % CJ r1 T C:. 's y Q. ` ?'# G.??G C?Y? ?C?.1 CJ? t ?J r l t r eA YNI !- 0? Ian t d r-, e C"i --> e- 0, CA'. C» n c. D('tY uG? " ? The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed 3.. use l r? ? ; tr?5?c?11aA10y. a?- 4N% Qr&?;2Q5c 7f;ck;cc?- t..?t 11 be t^Skc.?IeJ bvt lice --Peck o-r\4MJ 1 ca 1 ?a s emaP 5 S k 40r, bc? bo k c. C CA lech- ? ? ?- Sk??e. d.? F1ondtc? . 4. The proposed development is designed tgminimize traffic c ngestion. \ t r ? C ' Q k S ?f t7oOSe ?fU.iCc t ILLS [^A SrGnt°o -+ca ac-ILOr?rlr?nc?ct f Sty2?c- C?mb1c1!'S er1 ert t t; e) o ,, r t ..? w 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. t (i U ? C I t7J to tCtit V1G tt?1 -l i?? conl-%rylut,t?N el&k C.In G 4in CA \11 9- chQ-TCA 14- 1rv-\ e. v-e, Wc'L4 , bwv r6. 6r,r Sr? l ve - 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Oe C,v ?tk? sec'k PC (? t` C 'T G C), r (i , 1 r , c. , o ;4' U' ry) G t i c.4 ` NY'?C411r\o'('- -Or'e- Y1t??.J ,Gr1ckSGG C'r'A Ccu oow cle.StGr - ?ovi4p complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how a h criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. eCoYNl•r»e•G VCk?t)e -Cet `1'?O?'t Gr Q t.rr t 1 tntre4?C '}err ?cr?tn Cerrtilrrtt!tGtrJC 4tsrceAc.l Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater r r 1 2. The development of the parcel proposed development as a comprehensive infill redevelopm project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) t'Ke- nr?;?s_k Sk? t d ^ wit \ t,n c re?s? -1 \,e e c.o(NomI( - re Ue.n v e ?Qr C74 pr ua,vc? ? ?? 3. The uses within the comprehensive infll redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. ? c,a,dOL18 9_%ek Sery1(& " CA?) cry, S, r;A 6--L \,j X C-s4 n i N aoty%w CA- 5 vin i? YYIU ? ?i V S? b" r )&t \ ft C,^ 0"1 ?Q cx ? S S r ?e oe S - he uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 4 .T , , ? , &A - ? , L*.211 Lr?gtGucA yv?TV c. OL ? Cor?ue?lehce_ -c2 cAk Als- CVrrtA1 yt ? rP?eAt.I ;- CoryIrVALr4i bx.)ine f S OtineA t,,t4? 4V'UL PAS;41cj^ 01' t?Ja?4 ertS 4cI r ey ? nn¢r5 oLs wel? LA.,t << 4E r-c 4.?%i ec)afs. a^1enr-e- 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not o erwise available in th City of Clearwater. t? v O.J C C ec?- ca. c- - 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for de eloprr?ent. " W G A t- ci -4= ?\ .c rte l0? A ertar 1 IC12, y 1_STC Wi t w + t { \ 'r `fir t C/? r ., c} I 1_1 o %3s4 s e or. ® ? 4A4 c ew, r- 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. cl? Ni S VroooseC? S`-c? Qv- t??? \ bi'\ns cA- res?. tinr.mec?t o 0 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ?i S ;7?z?o5t?c? ;)"31 l eC,? ?t oc''er ecynye••?enc?S?0 ICL'J vvl. tt --g bCl?,tGe a CA. W- . o G5 lve. ? G 3U oc?-Q ZA r'Ge, } PGIt _ _? 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. o s k. h t n GA -` a-y? rl'e eA d6 r c rte r ?G rr?G 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. t4-' coo?C s bJe_- IT\ ?rox.sect prc. \ n e_%Ar? -P r c.. i r r ?-??2 n \ W n * -?s t^ Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMIT. REQUIREMENTS: (City of ClearwaW Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that in, addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be rovIded. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; G ARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (le. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to he submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater Location of existing public and priva*ties, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary se4hes, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201 (0)(i) and Index #7011; I Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. x SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; ! Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ( d REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y 2X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; i Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfiiling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. 4 REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y3 X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infili Application 2005- City of Clearwater I., BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SOWITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-2(w.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infiil Project. BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. 1 > All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). C3 Reduced signage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. X Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. 1r L. /SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representa to visit and photograph the property described in this ap ' Signature of property)6wner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this f day of 7-, A.D. 20 °S to me and/or by who is personally known has produced 3..«•.•«•«....»•..••.»••..••«•»•«••••? as ------- --------- identification. CM" DOW4344 GC bpka 12n V2007 Notary public, -4254: M commission expires: "Florida I?aryAsa"., Im Y a ............................................s Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) ? 3. That the undersigned has/ ave) appointed and does o) appoint: . a e lfV? -?? 06? 0 C Sy-' rI as (hi heir} gent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner N Property Owner .I JL Property Owner Property Owner COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this _ personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully unde;?y1S p>:j??that he/she signed. ,,... i CAMON SULUVAN S C MW 0002713+14 ¢VWW 12/112007 Notary Public My Commission Expires: 60nded tlnu (eoo)432.4254: arw Fbrida Notary Asp., lne iw.....n....pm.ws.sw.u.. uw.......i SAPlanning DepartmentiApplication FormsWevelopment revieMflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005. doc Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater I day of t t t ? , Planning Department o Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue > Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans \¢ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIdT1'SOLETE Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: J ?lk/ ?L /- MAILING ADDRESS: A v, ./V C/ t'°9'.eWarCle r./ S 17S S PHONE NUMBER: Z- LI J ^ H h/ FAX NUMBER: Z - 4-1 LIZ Z 3 PROPERTY OWNER(S): -721 !!? c- ?' ?"fT (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provi a original signature(s) n page 6) AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: (3_ (D - G `'Icc-1, FAX NUMBER: -sl J LD V (' / yq CELL NUMBER: / A E-MAIL ADDRESS: ?L7Se3A T e- C' O( - C G YY'1 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site:r `ytq0G A& AVe. eleGrwc,.?e?_ t= L 337?'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ??°a3t= wee 4Ree_k G1 0 4 4419- C rJn f ?-e c?uc (13 CG.vJ I n G S (if not listed here, please no the loca n of this document irythe submittal dS?G? PARCEL NUMBER: ?d 14210 PARCEL SIZE: _I ?Y `JAR T il7??C??C (acres, s uare feet) ` 1 S ! U 1 T PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): ir (number of dwelling units, hote YY square footage of nonresidential use DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): "7I V -7n nAcy C?% `? G 0?1 l? 1 ?? E'CJl (4 Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) : ? ? 0.? ? w 5? ? ? ? e s s 5 ? ?' ? v e ?'1? c c ? o I,rt?t ? ce u .s ve,, t . Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) X f pSUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see 9e 6) CDs WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- E lain how eac , riteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, character of adjacent properties in which it is located. VQCA g? ?? 1 h G.? ..}.WS I OC G?(V r , W i t' PJ)inc- resicAenc-e A- Cc.)y%An-Nt VP_rs -the. c-onver•ie_iA" ?e-te%r?_ E 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings`t or significantly -t Y1 mpair the vale t r. tjr% e% ` G'4 Eci t^1v1 ?1G.aa 'Si CIJt l t r1 ? c44 I C I C, m v +t _ 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed e_ %^SVC,11 AAtuY\ (>P W%is PrgPQSftA ?nx cc-.at 11 be tnskcallCJ bset C. FL % __I i - - _%_ i .1t t_ , L ti _ _ni _ . Q1_ t C.mt:)1e5 5Lk 40r? b?L b041- A-1._. C14-a C-A C1evrc? er' ? 4J5 r,k 04 F:Ior-tdtt,t. . ?J l E•. \r c.. Past tie. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, .on adjacent properties. . _ i , % t n r t i , t _ 1 _ -1 G.CNt rc.t bv Wt ` try E,. ?05 rnCAnnC('- a _,V6 J Akty% '% V1 G U13 V u? -\ne., n e_t.? , C?t1?SCG 7P G I?`+cJl c GfN C+.)&A d a s t G n - V C7 %.a complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain Ch criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. t? W 1? 4? a rkc& Ah a ,\ c).t? c aat'Ce n S G? r "e. t` . E - co r n e,/- _o t O n li v rt . cS?•_ G Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. a a 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) c t ?r5rck P?x 5?c.?t b w? \ ivn c rencse 4,e. e ol'NO iIC-_ re uen %J C. Apr t t Cr r e 04 QA eAr wu? e r c u rre isk4 ??+?v re ? lac,?? U c Kn w,0 411 M a cAr4'ki c Imp 3.1 The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. ?'eae Serul ce '**cOrl crn s don } V-z_,o_ A) ,..c \U x4ym o T 1N.s)tg%% C& S ?r,;? m?i 't v se. ,p _c nv%Si ?Q X5 4WiS !5 14 AoE< - bcar Ol1n ? 4. ;t The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. a to v Ca v e 1 t v ? ( ( ces lel ?tc.I } cary"Acrt-t.- X C?int r''S oixcl L.-n 4n ` k,r PA&; 41 a n at!i L_N.. kgiicanS fits r e0 54kQr„wr % ok S well ,a l k gh?c? A.?% L cchN. &-A t eor-e j 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not o erwise available in th City of Clearwater. V v O tit ETE ?6 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for dt!elop ent. ` \ t ? -C IOr? CC,cie- ?lG%nc% IrH oyVrlCn -4= & 0 e WO r% it- a o 4 e ecv_ r--- 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. GS? d ? .7s cly- L?`, ?1nG greyl, nc.W l? ko ?irv%rv'?¢c?r -e lF1iS ? J o a -V. C, C-04 C-- 81'; Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. t ")o 09C r I CA)nL)enienCt lQVnc?r A W.S ho.kt??• bec.?? to ?a?? d?-. G5 Li.?e l CA 3© QTR a4 rtie ? ?acg - Is 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. t mut Gv ??2 C1? cc? cty ?' ?t??r Z)or'k I __J 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. 1`\c-? coo\icsk1e - -V?\c?prQosecA rcx e4 1 ? ncr4 ?r? e-ll r c, Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMIT1W REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwat?Storm Drainage Design Crite Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invc addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance % the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exempt to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. U At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with City manual. _ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. 0 COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be rovided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) *46. e SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, f' including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ;E!`, LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; J "eARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; U GRADING PLAN, as applicable; U PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); U COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): J i All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; l Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; (Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater cation of existing public and privati(ities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sev*nes, manholes and lift stations, gas nd water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; ? Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SIT DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) and color rendering if possible; X FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; r Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; __?t All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: f All existing and proposed structures; J Names of abutting streets; ? Q{ainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; 10,61ineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; % Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed J landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); -47 Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 '/s X 11) (color rendering if possible); !fLi IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); O COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-2m.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or ?' to remain. X All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) 0 Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). C3 Reduced signage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) 0 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. 1 .a L. /SIGNATURE: (, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representa ' to visit and photograph the property described in this ap ' Signature of propertyj6wner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of u ?c A.D. 20 05 to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as identification. Won6m ^^ 3 +CO - if DOW4a44 ? /?N//100T 4 Forsk Notary public, 1P11 da '1254: My commission expires: a......?" ........Fb.....r:?..ry;;.", ....9 Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: ?j? ?E?s, Z E T tJ - E ^ 1?. TN G property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Mt,) ?-' vt_k ?ttC??t-, V-%' 3. That the undersigned has/ ave) appointed and does o) appoint: e.U 7S Q. kAp O C S?r? as (hi their) gent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner -" -. COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner Property Owner Property Ownei STATE OF FLORIDA, Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this _ ?/ ,55 personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully and (?j?ythat he/she signed.. DAMON IRUILJNAN • z MOM 12/1V2W Notary Public My Commission Expires: BWdW Mrru 000"-4254: FIbrids Nolwy Awn., Inc ><«....«....n.....w* ...................... i SAPianning Department\Application FormsWevelopment revieMtlexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc I day of Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater SUMMARY OF INSUR4ICiE Prepared: 10004 Page 1 For: El tg,iir of Tampa, Co. Carlisle Fields & Company, Inc Tarek P.O. Box 7910 2099 N Highland Avenue Clearwater, FL Clearwater, FL 33758-7910 727-797-0441 33755 441-3665 Coverage Amount Company Policy No Eff Exp Premium Commercial Application Westfield Insurance Company CWP3918573 09/25/04 09/25/05 1836.00 Premise 1 Building 1 2099 N Highland Avenue Clearwater , FL 33755 Property Westfield Insurance Company CWP3918573 09/25/04 09/25/05 Policy Level Information Premises 1 Building 1 BUILDING 425,000 Coins % 90 Valuation RC Cause of Loss SPECIAL Deductible 2500 Forms # 2% W&H General Liability Westfield Insurance Company cWP3918573 09125104 09/25/05 Occurrence General Aggregate 1,000,000 Products/Completed Oper. Aggr. 1,000,000 Personal & Advertising Injury 1,000,000 Each Occurrence 1,000,000 Fire Damage (Any One Fire) 150,000 Medical Expense (Any One Person) 10,000 1 Building or premises - LRO Class Code : 61212 Premium Basis : 5600 (A) AREA - PER 1,0001SQ FT I 1 Expanded GL endorsement SUMMARY OF INSUR f4CE For: El Amir of Tampa, Co. Tarek • 2099 N Highland Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 441-3665 Prepared: 1 OW04 Carlisle Fields & Company, Inc P.O. Box 7910 Clearwater, FL 33758-7910 727-797-0441 Policy No General Liability (Continued) Class Code : 99990 (A) AREA - PER 1,000/SQ FT 1201 Sunset Point Rd, Clw- Building or Premises Class Code : 61212 Premium Basis : 3000 Crime Robbery & Safe Burglary Inside: Robbery of Custodians 5,000 Safe Burglary 5,000 Outside Premises 5,000 Blanket Westfield Insurance Company I CWP3918573 ge Eff I Exp I Premium 09/25/04 1 09/25/05 u LI/PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: Emil G. Pratesi, Esquire Richards, Gilkey, Fite, Slaughter, Pratesi & Ward, P.A. 1253 Park Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 ?t _,;z-_ . AC,C I' REC?U DRQ1P ?3>So0 '3S 1-2002 5 :02pn INT ?v 02-091232 MAR- 47 FEES PINELLPS CO SK 11965 PS IItiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIQIIIillllllll 17 ?, ; ? IIII tic V _ WARRANTY DEED Tctrld *E' F. DE PLAKER, CLERK OF COURT LAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 10171821 03-01_21W 51 DED-EL AMIR 007507 I#:02081232 D( IKI RECORDING 002 PAGES DOC STS' - DR219 17:0?:M .111 i SP6:1747 EP6:1748 1 $10.50 3 $4.375.00 TOTAL: $43F5.50 CHECK AHT.TENDERED: $4385.50 CHANGE: $.00 ib--- DEPUTY CLERK BY ,? .,HAL _ THIS INDENTURE, Made this 1st day of March, 2002, Between G AMT JERRY H CENTER a/k/a GERALD H. CENTER AND JAMES H. CENTER, Individually and as Successor Trustees of THE MILDRED H. CENTER REVOCABLE TRUST and as Co-Personal Representatives of THE ESTATE OF MILDRED H. CENTER, PROBATE DIVISION IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, File Number 01-6396-ES3, whose address is c/o Patrick Rinard, Esquire, 1253 Park Street Clearwater Florida 33756 , grantors, and EL AMIR OF TAMPA COMPANY, a Florida corporation, whose address is 2099 Highland Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33755, grantee, WITNESSETH, That said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida, to-wit: Southeast (SE) corner Clearwater, Florida, feet of the West 250 West 1/2 of the NE 1/4 all lying and being in East, Pinellas County, of H7 ahland Avenue and Uin ion Sneer", Described as follows: The North 233 Feet: cf- the North 384.88 feet of the of the NW 1/4; LESS road right of ways Section 2, Township 29 South, Range 15 Florida. SUBJECT TO covenants, conditions, easements and restrictions of record; and subject to taxes for the year 2002 and subsequent years. Tax Parcel No. 02/29/15/00000/210/0500 Grantee's Tax I.D. No. 59-3424453 This property is not now nor never has been the homestead property of the Grantors. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, Gerald H. Center and James H. Center as Co-Personal Representatives of The Estate of Mildred H. Center make none as tc, the warranties contained herein and only warrant title for that period of time ,14 since they, as Co-Person_7:'_ R prese. Uat: iv'es of 'Erie Estate of Mildred H. Center, acquired title. and said grantor hereby fully warrant the title to said .land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. • • PINELLAS COUNTY FLR, OFF.REC,BK 11865 PO 1748 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Nt e: . e (e_ •zC Name : Pte/ LX-u!• RJAI me: Name : P4 i 1PAeK aJ 1?iw,*, JWsEH. CENTER a/k a GERALD HTE , Individually Aessor Trustee of the MILDRED H. CENTER REVOCABLE TRUST and Co- Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF MILDRED H. CENTER ES H. CENTER, Individually nd as Successor Trustee of he MILDRED H. CENTER REVOCABLE TRUST and Co- Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF MILDRED H. CENTER STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to take acknowledgements, JERRY H. CENTER a/k/a GERALD H. CENTER, Individually, as a Successor Trustee of THE MILDRED H. CENTER REVOCABLE TRUST and as a Co- Personal Representative of THE ESTATE OF MILDRED H. CENTER, PROBATE DIVISION IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, File Number 01-6396-ES3, who is ersonally known toing or who hasaproduced a identification, the person described in and who executed the foregoing Warranty Deed and he acknowledged then and there ti-,efore. me that he executed the same for the purposes therein express d. WITNESS my hand and official seal his ?y1st 2)f March, 2 0 0 2 . Name: ,4 i1?! UG lc/. Notary Public My Commi,Y ion exR&fc"Rinard MY COMMISSION # CC989229 EXPIRES Apri120, 2005 Rt BONDEDTHRUTROY;A1 WSURANCEIN STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to take acknowledgements, JAMES H. CENTER, Individually, as a Successor Trustee of THE MILDRED H. CENTER REVOCABLE TRUST and as a Co-Personal Representative of THE ESTATE OF MILDRED H. CENTER, PROBATE DIVISION IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, File Number 01-6396-ES3, who is ersona1ly? k- nowl? °"to or who has produced as identification, and he is the person described in and who executed the foregoing Warranty Deed and he acknowledged then and there before me that he executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my, hand and official 2002. EGP/jc:dss \CENTER\ELAMIR\DEED secl?,` this 1st ,day of March, V Name: G Notary Public My Commission expires: ,,, Patrick W. Rinard "'MY COMMISSION # CC989229 EXPIRES April 2% 2005 R? d •'? BONDED TNRU TROY FAN INSURANCE INC. }?ia4?r a,r, -A v w. } AIN vxkdx' ;-:- ..:? _ ra... ?. ,. .,.. - arr '•k ua -:?atarke ?v.<G'?::.a ._ ..,. y-.e. .... .+s<u _na+ewonei.?L4? - . _. _. _ .-wr- . ?? 9ePI?P? i bbib `T,.:4N s-yw ?'y rs?'., C ?_? _,.??n-ew...-?? ,. _ ._.. a? _.? ? . . ?. ?_ ??? ?.?. ..-...,,..gym--.... _ jjj? ??, ? ?P c •x .. ? - 3 ..: -.. ,' . .. `W`Lt'NWK+uVrdanwlu .. ? ? r '.. ?? ? a? N A1ew?-?wL ?xrvu±x?(•+J?'S:c.?.rn,a..?..iJ?AC.a s u?v.+? y• .? r igTW?WWw ?a-.?hw?.y: .. .. _ .. ?....rwu? ? ? Awl, uh-?"Wr.v? F { ___ -? _ _ __ _ ?- ?G y}?IP?II? "'' - _ ? ? '_ ? \ w, i ' aa =44 " l a I J ¦ 4 - ',;? fail.>.?.. i ?, ?9?b, ???, ?rl? ? pS a ?, ': d ?r ? ??? t ?? i F ? 3 )x g j r r J{ ? 4 t^ a k 106k 'A, „i. i ? I I ' p ? 3V u ?t T S *L "MI .s ti. ¦ f. Y r. y f r . ,? r L d ? ?_ • ? *- ? .? ? ,.•, ,. _.. . - t :4?i 2 Nye may. M ' .'? ?•' .V .+ y -r. 1` Al- Iti ? 1 LY= +At yy , 1, 7 1 - i 3 C ,_ t ' a, . ."h E -r 117 1 rt - 1 . ._- .. -?. a ?:--vs ?_ •._. ,_?? ,?yr-? ?V ?-. '°T'vnrr? . law 1 . • i I is i ? SCI??:? ? T"?- - - 4 s ?? ?? ?i't •'1 j .: ..`- 77 1 7777? - o l w, • i r a J ;? ?klll: %hl '?m ' MS 77 \ II .. ., axr (+ ' ti k k Jm ?. 1 i m-l LIE ' OWN gym:: , ,• nW.,? ?? . *d g. 0 I I a 10.40 am Case Number: FLD2005-07073 -- 2099 N HIGHLAND AVE Owner(s): El Amir Of Tampa Co 2099 Highland Ave Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Owner(s): Tarek Zein-E-Ding 2099 Highland Avenue Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: 727-441-3665, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Adel Blassy 10940 N 56th Street Tampa, FI 33617 TELEPHONE: 813-988-8600, FAX: 813-988-8556, E-MAIL: geoengineeringl@aol.com Location: The 0.918 acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of North Highland Avenue and Union Street. Atlas Page: 252A Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to establish an automobile service station at an existing commercial plaza contiguous to a parcel of land designated as residential within the Zoning Atlas as a Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-704.C. of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Auto service stations Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 18 • 0 1. Turning radius to access solid waste dumpster is inadequate, revise plan to show minimum 30-foot turning radius. 2. Sheet #6 and #8 will be reviewed when submitted as part of a building permit application; no review/comment will be provided at this time. 3. Handicap ramp is not properly located. Revise plan accordingly. 4. Provide all dimensions for parking lot. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. New dumpster enclosures: Maximum 6'-0" high and constructed of concrete block. Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building, see City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701. Plans shall be revised to replace dumpster details with referenced Index #701. 2. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 3. Obtain a County right-of-way permit for any proposed work within Union Street right-of-way. 4. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 5. Add County Road Number 600 for Union Street on the site plan. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy: 1. Applicant shall bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . Prior to building permit: Underground Storage Tanks - Four sets of drawings must be furnished to the Pinellas County Heath Dept. Engineering/Storage Tank Section for review and approval. A Proviso Letter issued by Pinellas County must be submitted to the City Environmental Dept. to remove this Hold. Contact Ernest Roggelin with the Pinellas County Storage Tank Section at (727) 538-7277 ex 1 136 for any questions. 2. Dewatering - if well pointing is required for installing the UST's, proper testing must be done in accordance with the Generic Permit for Discharge of Produced Groundwater from Non- Contaminated sites. Copies of lab results and the NOI (sent to the FDEP) must be sent to the City Env. Dept. prior to any discharge. Fire: Provide 30' radius at entrances for emergency vehicle access. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB 11/13/2006 Condition not met, provide 30' radius at entrances for emergency vehicles.PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: No Comments Development Review Agenda- Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 19 Legal: No Comments Land Resources: I No Issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 20 I . Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D. I., a 15' wide perimeter landscape buffer is required along the Highland Avenue and Union Street rights-of-way with one (1) tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage. The buffer is being provided along Highland Avenue with the exception of the required shrub coverage, and the buffer is also being provided along Union Street with the exception of the required shrub coverage and a 27' wide portion of the site where nothing is being proposed. UPDATE 1 I-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E. I., ten percent (10%) of the gross vehicular area shall be provided in interior landscape islands. As proposed, only 170 square feet of interior landscape area will exist, which is far below the above requirement. Additionally, interior islands shall be provided so that no more than ten (10) consecutive parking spaces are proposed in a row. The parking abutting the building consists of 15 consecutive parking spaces and as the proposal is severely deficient with regard to interior landscaping, flexibility to this number cannot be supported. Further, the above referenced Section states that one (1) interior tree shall be provided for every 150 square feet of required greenspace with shrubs accounting for 50% of that required greenspace. The proposed landscape plan does not meet the above. UPDATE 11-06-06: The revised landscape plan now depicts no interior landscaping. 3 . Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2., foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with frontage along a street right-of-way within a five foot (5') wide landscape area composed of at least two (2) accent trees or three (3) palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one (1) shrub for every 20 square feet. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be groundcover. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 4. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D. L, a ten foot (10') wide perimeter landscape buffer is required along the south and east property lines with one (1) tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage. As proposed, these perimeter requirements are not being met. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 5 . It is recommended that a terminal landscape island is provided on the south side of the southern most parallel parking space. The provision of this landscape island will assist the site in being able to meet its interior landscape requirement. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: While the parallel parking spaces are no longer proposed, the terminal landscape islands should still be provided. 6. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.B. I., shade trees shall have a caliper of 2.5" at the time of installation and shall be planted a minimum of five feet (5') from any impervious area. The proposed Live Oak and Green Buttonwood trees do not meet the required caliper and the Live Oaks proposed along the south property line, adjacent the vacuum, and within the interior landscape island are within five feet (5') of impervious areas. UPDATE 11-06-06: The shade trees now meet the minimum caliper requirement; however the Live Oaks are still proposed within five feet (5') of impervious areas. The landscape plan depicts Live Oak trees within the Highland Avenue and Union Street rights-of-way; however no indication has been given as to the disposition of these trees. Are they to be removed? Are they to remain? If so, depict their canopies on the landscape plan and revise the plan based upon their impact to the proposed materials. It is recommended that these existing Live Oaks are retained and the landscaping designed around them. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.A.2., the entire site must meet the landscape standards of Article 3, Division 12, based upon the establishment of a new use. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. Parks and Recreation: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 21 0 0 Stormwater: Solid Waste: The following to be addressed prior to CDB. 1. Demonstrate that stormwater attenuation and water quality is exempted. For post-conditions, the Runoff Coefficient C =0.475 shall be used for the impervious area that is under redevelopment, and C = 0.2 shall be used for the pervious area created from impervious(the latter will be a credit and may negate the stormwater attenuation, however this needs to be demonstrated using the above runoff coefficients and the areas involved). The following to be used prior to building permit. 1. Provide a copy of a the approved SWFWMD permit. That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be constructed to City specifications. Show on detail sheet Traffic Engineering: 1 , 1. All regular parking stall widths must be at a minimum of 9' wide per Community Development Code Section 3-1402.A. 2. Provide City details of handicapped parking stall and sign per Index # 118 and # 119. Go to link below http://www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index. asp 3. Provide stop signs with stop bar at the two driveways per current "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" standards. 4. Driveway access along Union Street shall be located 125' from signalized intersection per Access Management Standards Community Development Code Sec. 3-102 C.3. 5. Show on the site plan a scaled 17.5' passenger car staging at all fueling stations. Staging vehicle must not encroach in the 24' drive aisle. 6. Install a "No Left Turn" sign under the stop sign for driveway along Highland Ave. to make this driveway right-in/right-out only. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Prior to a building permit: 1) Obtain a right-of-way permit from the County for work along Union Street. Planning: General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 22 0 n The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #9 will need to be revised based upon insufficient parking being provided for the development (as previously stated, this will be discussed later in greater detail). UPDATE I 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #4, does not address HOW the proposed use is compatible to adjacent land uses. Whether or not the fuel pumps add convenience to nearby uses/property owners is irrelevent. A thourough and accurate response to this criterion is absolutely necessary as compatibility between the proposed automobile service station and the contiguous residentially zoned properties is the underlying reason this request must be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 3 . The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #8 is misleading and must be revised. The proposal only adds the fuel pumps to the development - the other uses already exist. The number of parking spaces is also incorrect as only 21 parking spaces will exist (this is discussed in greater detail later). In addition, the response does not clearly address HOW the reduced setbacks are justified by the benefits provided to the immediate vicinity. UPDATE I 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 4. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-703, the required front setback for an Automobile Service Station is 25 feet, and the required side setback is ten feet (10'). The development proposal depicts front (north and west) setbacks of 10 feet and 15 feet, respectively, and a side (south) setback of eight feet (8'); however these deviations are not included in the description of request. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 5 . According to the survey the sidewalk within the Union Street right-of-way is adjacent to the property line; however the existing and proposed site plans, the landscape plan, and all utility plans each depict the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the curb. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 6. According to the existing water line utility plan (sheet 10 of 12) an existing water line runs beneath the property at its northwest corner. Clarify how the existance of this water line will impact the proposed landscaping. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 7. The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #3, does not address the criterion at all. Provide a relevent response. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 8. The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #7, does not address HOW the redevelopment project will create a form and function enhancing the community character of the vicinity. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 9. Similarly to the above comment, the location of the existing sanitary cleanout differs between the survey and the existing sanitary line utility plan. If the survey is correct, then submit a revised sanitary line utility plan; however if the "plan" is correct, then a new survey will need to be prepared and submitted. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 10. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1402.A., the required aisle width for drive aisles with 90 degree parking spaces is 24 feet. The typical drive aisle width along the east and west sides of the canopy is slightly more than 27 feet, and constricts to roughly 22.5 feet where the canopy is adjacent to the interior landscape island. The width along the south side of the canopy is in excess of 33 feet, while the width along the north side is only 15 feet. UPDATE 11-06-06: The width of the drive aisles on the east and west sides of the canopy are only 23 feet. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 23 E It . Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground. The survey provided depicts existing aboveground utilities at the rear (east) of the building that will be required to be relocated underground with this development proposal. Further, such relocation must be depicted on the proposed plans. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 12. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H. I., mechanical equipment shall be screened from any adjacent right-of-way and from adjacent properties. Depict the locations of all existing and proposed mechanical equipment on the site and landscape plans along with the means by which they are screened from view (this includes any/all mechanical equipment associated with the fuel pumps). UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 13 . The proposed fuel pump canopy elevations do not depict the provision of under canopy lighting. As it is assumed that such lighting will be provided, please be advised that such lighting will need to be fully recessed and mounted within the canopy so that it will not protrude below the canopy deck. UPDATE l 1-06-06: Further information (other than a line on the elevation) needs to be provided to address this comment. 14. The response provided to General Application criterion #5, does not address HOW the proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 15 . The excess paved area located at the northwest corner of the site between the two parallel parking spaces shall be converted to landscape area. This landscape area will be able to be counted toward meeting the interior landscape requirements. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: While the parking spaces involved are no longer parallel, the excess pavement still remains. 16. The response provided to General Application criterion #2, does not address HOW the proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 17. The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #1, does not address HOW the redevelopment of the parcel is impractical without deviations from use, intensity or development standards. Provide a response addressing the actual criterion. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 18. Clarify the disposition of all existing lighting. UPDATE I 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 19. In addition to the aforementioned under canopy lighting, identify the location of all other lighting proposed on site. Please be advised that all such lighting must meet the requirements of CDC Section 3-1302. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 20. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A., a 20 foot x 20 foot sight visibility triangle is required at the intersection of Highland Avenue and Union Street. Revise the site and landscape plans accordingly. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 21 . The submittal included the provision of "existing" architectural elevations; however no "proposed" architectural elevations. Please clarify if the building is to remain "as is". In addition to the above, please be advised that as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment request the City will likely be looking for improvements to the existing architectural elevations. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: The elevations now clarify the elevations as existing and proposed; however the above with regard to improvements still remains. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 24 i 22. The response provided to General Application criterion #6, does not sufficiently address HOW the design of the proposed development minimizes the stated effects. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 23 . The water line utility plan does not depict any actual water lines running to the subject building. Please clarify. UPDATE H-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 24. Four foot (4') and six foot (6) high fences are depicted on the survey as existing along the south and east property lines, respectively. However, these fences are not depicted on any other plan. Clarify if the fences are to remain and depict there existence on the plans. UPDATE 1] -06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 25 . The response provided to General Application criterion #1, does not address the stated criterion. Provide a revised response that addresses HOW the proposal will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 26. Two (2) public payphones exist at the northwest corner of the existing building with a third located adjacent to the northeast corner of the property within the Union Street right-of-way. Clarify the disposition of the existing payphones. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 27. Pursuant to CDC Section 4-202.A.1 Li., the site plan shall depict the location of all street rights-of-way adjacent to the site. The proposed site plan (sheet 3 of 11) does not depict this. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 28. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1406.A., the standard dimension for an off-street loading space is 12' x 35' (width x length). The proposed loading space measures approximately 21' x 56' to the outward extent of the open refure enclosure gates. If such an excessively large loading area is necessary, then provide justification in support of this. If not, then reduce the loading area to meet the standard dimensions and incorporate the excess pavement into landscape area. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 29. The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #2, does not address HOW the redevelopment of the parcel will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Instead it attempts to address increased economic revenue for the City, which is irrelevent to the criterion. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 30. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1402.A., the standard dimension for parallel parking spaces is 8' x 23', not 9'x 20' as proposed. Further, a recently adopted code amendment has modified the depth of a standard parking space to 18'. Revise the plans accordingly. UPDATE I t-06-06: As noted above, the minimum dimension for parallel parking spaces is eight feet (8'); however the minimum dimension for standard parking spaces is nine feet (9'). All of the proposed standard parking spaces have been designed with a width of eight feet (8'); thus all of the proposed parking spaces do not meet Code. 31 . Provide additional information on the canopy elevations plan (sheet 5 of 12) as to the colors and materials of the proposed canopy. It is noted that the canopy elevations appear rather bland and lack any visual interest. Revisions to improve the aesthetics of the canopy will be required. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 32 . A note is provided on the canopy elevations (sheet 5 of 12) stating that the canopy elevations are for illustration only and that the contractor will verify information with canopy manufacturers submitted signed and sealed drawings. Please clarify the intent and purpose of this statement. How are these elevations "for illustration only"? Plans submitted should be consistent with what is actually proposed to be constructed. UPDATE 11-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 25 C E 33. The survey provided with the application depicts the existance of a screen enclosure at the rear (east side) of the building; however this "existing" screen enclosure is depicted on neither the proposed site plan nor the architectural elevations, and further, following a visit to the site, was confirmed as not actually being in existance. The survey also indicates two lightpoles within landscape islands on site, which were confirmed as not being in existance by the aforementioned site visit. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. A revised survey will need to be provided. 34. Pursuant to CDC Section 6-104.A., where a building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use, signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance by obtaining a level one approval in accordance with the provisions of Article 4, Division 3. Based upon the above, the existing nonconforming signage on the subject property will need to be brought into compliance. UPDATE 1 1-06-06: This comment has not been addressed. 35 . The canopy elevations (sheet 5 of 12) depict several signs along the canopy facade. Please be advised that approval of signage is not included as part of this review. Other: No Comments Notes: Based upon the above and the length of time between DRC meetings (8 months),staff has determined that this application be withdrawn. Should the applicant still desire to move forward with the proposal, a new application, fee, and plans must be submitted. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 26 1:00 pm Case Number: FLD2005-07073 - 2099 N HIGHLAND AVE Owner(s): Owner(s): El Amir Of Tampa Co 2099 Highland Ave Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Tarek Zein-E-Ding 2099 Highland Avenue Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-441-3665, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Adel Blassy E 10940 N 56th Street Tampa, FI 33617 TELEPHONE: 813-988-8600, FAX: 813-988-8556, E-MAIL: geoengineeringl@aol.com Location: The 0.918 acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of North Highland Avenue and Union Street. Atlas Page: 252A Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to establish an automobile service station at an existing commercial plaza contiguous to a parcel of land designated as residential within the Zoning Atlas as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-704.C. of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Auto service stations Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , 1. Turning radius to access solid waste dumpster is inadequate, revise plan to show minimum 30-foot turning radius. 2. Sheet #6 and #8 will be reviewed when submitted as part of a building permit application; no review/comment will be provided at this time. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. New dumpster enclosures: Maximum 6-0" high and constructed of concrete block. Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building, see City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701. Plans shall be revised to replace dumpster details with referenced Index #701. 2. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 3. Obtain a County right-of-way permit for any proposed work within Union Street right-of-way. Environmental: 1 . Plans for fuel service installation shall be reviewed and signed by Pinellas County Eng. Department. Contact Ernest Roggelin at 538-7277 ex 1136. Fir (' 1 Provide 30' radius at entrances for emergency vehicle access. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB 2. Provide and show on plan a fire hydrant within 300' of furthest corner at rear of building. Must be on the same side of street as building. If not then one must be installed at entrance to property. show on plan PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 20 Landscaping: Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1202.A.2., the entire site must -' meet the landscape standards of Article 3, Division 12, based upon the establishment of a new 2 use. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.13.1., shade trees shall have a caliper of 2.5" at the time of installation and shall be planted a minimum of five feet (5') from any impervious area. The proposed Live Oak and Green Buttonwood trees do not meet the required caliper and the Live Oaks proposed along the south property line, adjacent the vacuum, and within the interior landscape island are within five feet (5') of impervious areas. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.B. I., accent trees shall have a height of eight feet (8') and a caliper of two inches (2") at time of installation. The Crape Myrtle are proposed with a height of between six feet (6') and eight feet (8') and no caliper is given. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.13.1., palm trees shall have ten feet (10') of clear and straight trunk at time of installation. The Washingtonia Palms are proposed with six feet (6') of clear trunk only. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D. L, a ten foot (10') wide perimeter landscape buffer is required along the south and east property lines with one (1) tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage. As proposed, these perimeter requirements are not being met. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.I ., a 15' wide perimeter landscape buffer is required along the Highland Avenue and Union Street rights-of-way with one (1) tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage. The buffer is being provided along Highland Avenue with the exception of the required shrub coverage, and the buffer is also being provided along Union Street with the exception of the required shrub coverage and a 27' wide portion of the site where nothing is being proposed. ?'. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E. L, ten percent (10%) of the gross vehicular area shall be provided in interior landscape islands. As proposed, only 170 square feet of interior landscape area will exist, which is far below the above requirement. Additionally, interior islands shall be provided so that no more than ten (10) consecutive parking spaces are proposed in a row. The parking abutting the building consists of 15 consecutive parking spaces and as the proposal is 'a severely deficient with regard to interior landscaping, flexibility to this number cannot be ` supported. Further, the above referenced Section states that one (1) interior tree shall be ; Z( provided for every 150 square feet of required greenspace with shrubs accounting for 50% of that required greenspace. The proposed landscape plan does not meet the above. ` D Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2., foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with frontage along a street right-of-way within a five foot (5') wide landscape . area composed of at least two (2) accent trees or three (3) palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one (1) shrub for every 20 square feet. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be groundcover. r The landscape plan depicts Live Oak trees within the Highland Avenue and Union Street rights-of-way; however no indication has been given as to the disposition of these trees. Are they to be removed? Are they to remain? If so, depict their canopies on the landscape plan and revise the plan based upon their impact to the proposed materials. It is recommended that these existing Live Oaks are retained and the landscaping designed around them. i "'J 0 It is recommended that a terminal landscape island is provided on the south side of the southern most parallel parking space. The provision of this landscape island will assist the site in being able to meet its interior landscape requirement. Parks and Recreation: V No Comments Stormwater: I , No Issues Solid Waste: 1 . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be constructed to City specifications. Show on detail sheet Traffic Engineering: i a! V_ 14 sZ "e»tj Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 21 1. Provide City details of handicapped parking stall and sign per Index #118 and #119. 2. Provide stop signs with stop bar compliant to current "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" standards. 3. Driveway width and curb radius must meet Fire Department's standards. 4. Provide accessible route from public sidewalk to accessible entrance compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. 5. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles per Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. 6. Parallel parking spaces shall be 23-feet long per Community Development Code Section 3-1402A. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 22 0 0 1 The response provided to General Application criterion #1, does not address the stated criterion. Provide a revised response that addresses HOW the proposal will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2 . The response provided to General Application criterion #2, does not address HOW the proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings. 3 . The response provided to General Application criterion #5, does not address HOW the proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 4 The response provided to General Application criterion #6, does not sufficiently address HOW the design of the proposed development minimizes the stated effects. 5 .' The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #1, does not address HOW the redevelopment of the parcel is impractical without deviations from use, intensity or development standards. Provide a response addressing the actual criterion. 6 The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #2, does not address HOW the redevelopment of the parcel will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Instead it attempts to address increased economic revenue for the City, which is irrelevent to the criterion. 7. The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #3, does not address the criterion at all. Provide a relevent response. 8, The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #4, does not address HOW the proposed use is compatible to adjacent land uses. Whether or not the fuel pumps add convenience to nearby uses/property owners is irrelevent. A thourough and accurate response to this criterion is absolutely necessary as compatibility between the proposed automobile service station and the contiguous residentially zoned properties is the underlying reason this request must be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. 9 , The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #7, does not address HOW the redevelopment project will create a form and function enhancing the community character of the vicinity. 10. The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #8 is misleading and must be revised. The proposal only adds the fuel pumps to the development - the other uses already exist. The number of parking spaces is also incorrect as only 21 parking spaces will exist (this is discussed in greater detail later). In addition, the response does not clearly address HOW the reduced setbacks are justified by the benefits provided to the immediate vicinity. j 1 The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criterion #9 will need to be revised based upon insufficient parking being provided for the development (as previously stated, .this will be discussed later in greater detail). 12.1 Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-703, the required front setback for an Automobile Service Station is 25 feet, and the required side setback is ten feet (10'). The development proposal depicts front (north and west) setbacks of 10 feet and 15 feet, respectively, and a side (south) setback of eight feet (8'); however these deviations are not included in the description of request. 13 Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H. I., mechanical equipment shall be screened from any adjacent right-of-way and from adjacent properties. Depict the locations of all existing and proposed mechanical equipment on the site and landscape plans along with the means by which they are ? screened from view (this includes any/all mechanical equipment associated with the fuel pumps). 14 . Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A., a 20 foot x 20 foot sight visibility triangle is required at the intersection of Highland Avenue and Union Street. Revise the site and landscape plans accordingly. 15 Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground. The survey provided depicts existing aboveground utilities at the rear (east) of the building that will be required to be relocated underground with this development proposal. Further, such relocation must be depicted on the proposed plans. ;16) Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1402.A., the standard dimension for parallel parking spaces is 8' x 23', not 9'x 20' as proposed. Further, a recently adopted code amendment has modified the depth of a standard parking space to 18'. Revise the plans accordingly. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1402.A., the required aisle width for drive aisles with 90 degree parking spaces is 24 feet. The typical drive aisle width along the east and west sides of the canopy is slightly more than 27 feet, and constricts to roughly 22.5 feet where the canopy is adjacent to the interior landscape island. The width along the south side of the canopy is in excess of 33 feet, while the width along the north side is only 15 feet. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 23 • • 18 ) r 23 24 25 26 ?8 •1 r30? ,31 X32 34 ) 35? Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1406.A., the standard dimension for an off-street loading space is 12' x 35' (width x length). The proposed loading space measures approximately 21' x 56' to the outward extent of the open refure enclosure gates. If such an excessively large loading area is necessary, then provide justification in support of this. If not, then reduce the loading area to meet the standard dimensions and incorporate the excess pavement into landscape area. Pursuant to CDC Section 4-202.A.1 Li., the site plan shall depict the location of all street rights-of-way adjacent to the site. The proposed site plan (sheet 3 of 11) does not depict this. The Site and Parking Calculations table states that a total of 30 parking spaces are provided with this development proposal; however only 21 parking spaces are actually provided for. The proposed parallel parking space in front of the car vacuum and air/water hose and the areas adjacent the proposed fuel pumps cannot be counted toward meeting the parking requirement. What is the purpose of the proposed 10'x 40' trailer at the rear (east) of the building? This will be counted as floor area for which parking must be provided. Additionally, the trailer, despite its noted dimensions, actually scales to Y x 20'. Please clarify. What is the height of the proposed trailer? The proposed fuel pump canopy elevations do not depict the provision of under canopy lighting. As it is assumed that such lighting will be provided, please be advised that such lighting will need to be fully recessed and mounted within the canopy so that it will not protrude below the canopy deck. Clarify the disposition of all existing lighting. In addition to the aforementioned under canopy lighting, identify the location of all other lighting proposed on site. Please be advised that all such lighting must meet the requirements of CDC Section 3-1302. The excess paved area located at the northwest corner of the site between the two parallel parking spaces shall be converted to landscape area. This landscape area will be able to be counted toward meeting the interior landscape requirements. The survey, the existing condtions plan and the landscape plan have all been prepared at a scale of 1:20, while the proposed site plan has been prepared at a scale of 1:10. Upon resubmittal of revised plans, please provide all plans at the same 1:20 scale. The submittal included the provision of "existing" architectural elevations; however no "proposed" architectural elevations. Please clarify if the building is to remain "as is". In addition to the above, please be advised that as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment request the City will likely be looking for improvements to the existing architectural elevations. According to the survey provided, a fire hydrant exists within the Highland Avenue right-of-way approximately 43 feet south of the north property line of the subject property. However, the existing water line utility plan (sheet 10 of 12) provided depicts this fire hydrant roughly six feet (6) on the subject property and some 69 feet south of the north property line. Similarly to the above comment, the location of the existing sanitary cleanout differs between the survey and the existing sanitary line utility plan. If the survey is correct, then submit a revised sanitary line utility plan; however if the "plan" is correct, then a new survey will need to be prepared and submitted. According to the existing water line utility plan (sheet 10 of 12) an existing water line runs beneath the property at its northwest corner. Clarify how the existance of this water line will impact the proposed landscaping. The water line utility plan does not depict any actual water lines running to the subject propert-N Please clarify. Four foot (4') and six foot (6) high fences are depicted on the survey as existing along the south and east property lines, respectively. However, these fences are not depicted on any other plan. Clarify if the fences are to remain and depict there existance on the plans. According to the survey the sidewalk within the Union Street right-of-way is adjacent to the property line; however the existing and proposed site plans, the landscape plan, and all utility plans each depict the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the curb. Two (2) public payphones exist at the northwest corner of the existing building with a third w located adjacent to the northeast corner of the property within the Union Street right-of-wayT Clarify the disposition of the existing payphones on site and why there is a need to reduce the required front setback along the north property line to locate two (2) additional payphones at the nnrthwest corner of the property.. Clarify how access is envt oncd to occur for the southernmost parallel parking space. Typically parallel parking spaces are accessed by being backed into; however in order to perform this maneuver at this location it would necessitate encroaching into the adjacent Highland Avenue ingress/egress drive aisle. t, . . I 'P : ' a, Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 24 • 0 37. The survey provided with the application depicts the existance of a screen enclosure at the rear (east side) of the building; however this "existing" screen enclosure is depicted on neither the proposed site plan nor the architectural elevations, and further, following a visit to the site, was - confirmed as not actually being in existance. The survey also indicates two lightpoles within landscape islands on site, which were confirmed as not being in existance by the aforementioned site visit. 38) A note is provided on the canopy elevations (sheet 5 of 12) stating that the canopy elevations are for illustration only and that the contractor will verify information with canopy manufacturers submitted signed and sealed drawings. Please clarify the intent and purpose of this statement. How are these elevations "for illustration only"? Plans submitted should be consistent with what is actually proposed to be constructed. KA9) The canopy elevations (sheet 5 of 12) depict several signs along the canopy facade. Please be advised that approval of signage is not included as part of this review. FO? Provide additional information on the canopy elevations plan (sheet 5 of 12) as to the colors and materials of the proposed canopy. It is noted that the canopy elevations appear rather bland and lack any visual interest. Revisions to improve the aesthetics of the canopy will be required. 4 I! Pursuant to CDC Section 6-104.A., where a building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use, signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance by obtaining a level one approval in accordance with the provisions of Article 4, Division 3. Based upon the above, the existing nonconforming signage on the subject property will need to be brought into compliance. Other: No Comments Notes: This application has been deemed insufficient to proceed before the Community Development Board (CDB). Please submit revised plans and application package (as necessary) on or before Noon, May 5, 2006, for review by the DRC on June 12, 2006. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 25 0 0 C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posy OFl:x:r. Box 4748, CLEARWATH, FLofi1DA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYR"IZB Avj?.Nrli, C.LI?APXW1FR, FLORIDA 33750 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4665 LONG RANGE PIANNING DF.VITOPMEMN REVIEW February 24, 2006 Mr. Adel Blassy GeoEngineering, Inc. 10940 N 56`h Street, Suite #201 Tampa, FL 33617 Re: FLD2005-07073 - 2099 North Highland Avenue - Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Blassy: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2005-07073. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, March 30, 2006, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 5624865 E-Mail: robert.tcfft(&mycleanvater.coni FON'U IIMMUD, NI \1(M 13u i_ ??> uz?, Vua -,M \) ()I,' 1?)HS 1)( w,vy, C )t 1?( ii y11 v1M I" HUSK II VvII I()A, C<)[ jai ?tl..?t?ti.U ® CAUi I A. P] I IGm "( 11 \11 \11m U "FQ1 Ai. ENIPi o vWN I AND Ai:rwm:cnvL: ACru ?N I NIN M i.R"' 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 0 TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: February 24, 2006 Adel Blassy, GeoEngineering, Inc., (813) 988-8556 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2005-07073 - 2099 North Highland Avenue Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.te t(a?myclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myj?learwater.com ** 0 0 Feb. 24 2006 02:10PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98139888556 Feb.24 02:09PM 01'18 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVAN'T'AGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 0 0 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW December 1, 2005 Mr. Scott Jaworski 314 West Windhorst Road Brandon, FL 33510 Re: 2099 North Highland Avenue (FLD2005-07073) Dear Mr. Jaworski: The following information is provided to you as designated agent for the above referenced project. On August 4, 2005, a Letter of Incompleteness identifying deficiencies within the application was provided to you (copy attached). To date, the required information set forth in this letter has not been submitted and the application remains incomplete. If it is your intention to continue this application, please do so prior to the next application submittal deadline of Noon, Wednesday, December 28, 2005. If a revised application addressing the deficiencies outlined in the Letter of Incompleteness is not received by this date, your application will be considered withdrawn. If you have no intention of continuing this application, please provide a letter informing us of your intention to withdraw the application. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via email at robert.teftlC&myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 S.• (Planning Departmental D BIFLEX (FLD)IlncompleteWighland N 2099 - Happy Foods Plaza (C) - R711lighland Ave N2099 -Letter ojlntent to Withdraw.doc BRIAN J". AL Gsl, MAYOR FRANK I11RRARD, VICE: MAYOR Horn I-IAMILION, COUNCIL?IBIBER B[LL J()NtiON, COUNCILNIENIBER CARUN A. P1:1FR`;F_.N, COUNCLNIFNIBER "EQL!AL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FmIlLOYER 9 0 ???7+0?? C1 t °jsr6M! LONG RANGE PIANNING DPm,i,oPmENT REVIEW August 4, 2005 Mr. Scott Jaworski 314 West Windhorst Road Brandon, FL 33510 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVI Es Ui1iu)iNG, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE. (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Re: FLD2005-07073 - 2099 N Highland Avenue - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Jaworski: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2005-07073. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Development Application, a site plan is to be submitted which depicts the location of all public and private easements. The site plan provided does not depict all easements as depicted on the survey. (08/04/05) The revised drawing has not addressed this comment. 2. Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Development Application, a site plan is to be submitted which depicts the location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site. The proposed site plan does not depict these rights-of-way. (08/04/05) The revised drawing has not addressed this item. Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Development Application, a site plan is to be submitted which includes a site data table. The site data table shall include: land area in square feet and acres; gross floor area devoted to each use; parking spaces (total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces); total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; size and species of all landscape material; official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easements; building and structure heights; impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. (08/04/05) The site data table included on the revised site plan must be revised to contain the following: (a) Land area in acrage; (b) Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easements; (c) Building and structure heights; and (d) Floor area ratio (F.A.R.). BRIA I. At N(1S1, MA)ok FkVAK I IMMED, Vu e YS :M* I toYI I I:ANil[ ]OS, C'"I N(.l L,\TAlN k joss(),, C(n 1?( iiy11 NMI 11, ? C.vkIF_N A. PIaLR?rS, G)t N( iuirmm t,: ''J"Qt Ai. EMITM NIEN I AND ArF1Rm y I1v[; ACI lo.,y FNII'1.o)1.R„ 0 0 The Affadavit to Authorize Agent submitted with the Flexible Development Application is incomplete as the names of all property owners listed on the deed has not been completed. (08/04/05) The resubmitted application has not addressed this comment. 5. Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Development Application, reduced building elevations (8 ''h" x 11 ") are to be submitted as well as a color rendering. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Noon, Tuesday, August 9, 2005. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft(a-),myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 5624865 s CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE Clearwater CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: August 4, 2005 Scott Jaworski, (813-681-7784) Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2005-07073 / 2099 N Highland Avenue Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: r•obert.tefft(i?i'myclearwatei°.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** Aug. 04 2005 10:06AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98136817784 Aug.04 10:04AM 01'25 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' ##04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 0 LONG RANGE. PIANNING DEYELorw,N1' RT:v]F?v' July 5, 2005 Scott Jaworski 314 West Windhorst Road Brandon, F133510 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLFARWATE R, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES N]LDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI F AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 RE: FLD2005-07073 -- 2099 North Highland Avenue -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Scott Jaworski : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2005-07073. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Development Application, a site plan is to be submittedwhich depicts the location of all public and private easements. The site plan provided does not depict all easements as depicted on the survey. 2. Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Development Application, a site plan is to be submittedwhich depicts the location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site. The proposed site plan does not depict these rights-of-way. 3. Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Development Application, a site plan is to be submittedwhich depicts the location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines. The proposed site plan does not depict the above utilities. Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Development Application, a site plan is to be submitted which . includes a site data table. The site data table shall include: land area in square feet and acre's gross floor area devoted to each use; parking spaces (total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces); total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; size and species of all _ landscape matenal• o fficial records book and page numbers of all existing utility easements;, building and structure heights; impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R and floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. S. Pursuant to Section G of the Flexible Development Application, a reduced site plan (8 ''/z" x 11 ") is to be submitted. 6. Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application, a reduced landscape plan (8 '/z" x 11 ") is to be submitted. 7. Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application, an irrigation plan is to be submitted. 8. ' The Affadavit to Authorize Agent submitted with the Flexible Development Application is incomplete as the names of all property owners listed on the deed has not been completed. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken Bpw, 1..-1T?Nrsr, M»wni FR,\mE IIi?s?s?iin, V(,T: A1? )l? I Iorr Ik>ui.1<)N, On"m 11.\11 vio.a I311 .i, Cut ti(11 >n.?Eisr_i; C, \["] FN A. P1,11 1,,<l N, Cox v( If vIf vIlil?1i AI?r11olvI1y1: A( Ilw,EN11'IS)S 0 • until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Noon, July 11, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or at robert.tefft(a7,myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert G. Tefft Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-07073 - 2099N HIGHLAND AVE 0 Jul. 05 2005 02:52PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98136817784 Jul.05 02:50PM 01'25 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR ' -' . FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAR: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: July 5, 2005 Scott Jaworski, Bert Thomas Architect, (813-681-7784) Robert G. Tefft, Planner III 2099 Highland Avenue / Happy Foods Plaza / FLD2005-07073 Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: Robert. TefflAmyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** ORIGIW RECEIVED NO 0 2 2006 - - - _ _ UNION SrR£E7 - BOUNDARY SURVEY HAPPY FOOD PLAZA CITY OF CLEARWATER ?•• ' 3s' _ PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA I P --- ' ' y r9 I __r-,'? 11 ?1 vaY ,. _ X, LAII6 W? ti I) 11I I meex a ,? ?_I____ ,R• xpro'J1'?1 1°iO A; 1oo?J ?u SITE LAYOUT SCALE: 1'= 20' - rnmw r n?' ur : r.?.`?oox ? rz?vc n - nn . rw°a - n ..ssw,a. •?' ? ?? ,C; 'xL?o4R4i -- ------------------------------ urw s,?Hxxes scwxcm' .www,eo x ?i,'d"m a rracr ,rv. ram mr m .aa .w p ? rvo ,x.... or. ,.m nrlmrx'O.r""x` .. ro a 7-1 Amcma 64KER ASSOCN7E5 i LIST OF DRAWINGS 1. COVER SHEET AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 2• EXISTING SITE PLAN 3• PROPOSED SITE PLAN 4- EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS 5- CANOPY ELEVATIONS S- DISPENSER CONNECTION AND PIPING DETAILS 7- BUOYANCY CALCULATIONS, EQUIPMENT AND DETAILS DISABLED PARKING / MARKING DETAIL 8- UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK DETAILS 9- DUMPSTER [TRASH ENCLOSURE ',. 10- EXISTING UTILITY PLAN 11• LANDSCAPE PLAN 12- IRRIGATION PLAN SEE ATTACHED SIGN AND SEALED CO OF THIS SURVEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER OWNER INFORMATION: RECORDED OWNER: EL AMIR OF TAMPA CO PROPERTY 1D: 0212W18M0000/21010500 ADDRESS: 2099 HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 SHORT LEGAL: FROM NW CDR OF NE 114 OF NW DESCRIPTION Y. RUN E 60 FT TH S 33 FT FOR POB TH S 200 FT TH W 200 FT TH N 190 ZONING: COMMERCIAL PROPERTY USE/: 321MI STRIP STORE (IOR LAND USE: MORE STORES . SOME MAY INCLUDE AN OFFICE, CONVENIENCE STORE, BAR ANDIOR RESTAURANT, BUT NO MAJOR FOOD STORE) CURRENT USE: GROCERYSTORE PROPOSED USE: GROCERY STORE I GAS STATION LAND SIZE: 200 ' It 200' YEAR BUILT: 1974 BUILDINGS AREA: BASE- 5,720' 1 CANOPY•1,368' 1 ASPHALT?8,500' FLOOD PANEL ID: 12103C0107G FLOOD ZONE: X-600 FLOOD PLAINS. NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS AND SPECIFICATION WAS PREP BY ME OR UNDER ECT ISION J3NA ..194 f1m r _` i NU z t µy N O J = F a?? Q W W N2C ??NN pW O o LL Q F ? ." a. ( R U CL 3 t? All = LL o m I LL OF 12 SHEETS RIGI RECEWED V 0 2 2006 C\ z A x F cw zz UNION eN,.lero rvwo Nn ? d>,. ©rnPf@e1Y Lw ©eailrt.CTCR ro leltlA MO wlrC ¦ R tOW1lr Y 0/NY 1®? ro t?OML1n 1W TI,LIM MAATIatrM.TIK.rLfl OCOr ral M CRV P ClE11e1\11ER ®?.tW.t r ro raa+. M NO, wow mars s \r uYatr. ©oaktw Twr \ elver N Twr MefA .r ro r oaa.IruT ems ur.r+'LOn,?i•i.?i'? rira ©wsTw e1eN ro rtere.N N.Mr \eeATNN uor w®. ?° wrurt'?rwiwrwai e\?inrw IirMTww,?i' w' ? a\ INVE V1' P dJM 11ViC U -- I i i rR I I /rrLT N i I I i 1 1 ? I I $ j I rnkr. I? ? 1 ( I I I ' I 1 Ik ? k II I I e ? ? r?,ew?lwm i 8 it «s`ww ? I 1 I f , i I I ' i C I I j? ? w,ase '?ei ( a , I --- ------------------------------------------- A re»xeQ? ?.« LEGAL DESCRIPTION OIniYT MI?l1 R NY{.MO.,,... Mo wd.,Rar.OJAIYYIBt,,.aa. w?G1erED N rcuor. M aort1N IaM rrT O M rkT,NMlrT O M NOIefN MW nn O M erT N R M 11wT1wr W R M wlmr?T W lri roAO IaNnoweun Au lYw Mo rrM M reTWN i weWir,L kOIM il.raa • car, rwuu caret. ndoA G'OM[ M 11pRRWT W R M 11o1er1rlrT W P raTKNLmWV1lr,k rpinl )LiO r@i 1.11il00.1iT rtOM rrT. TIrICd NMM,IVN rrt, 11W WT rrM Ili. T1pcr RarN rwlrT, a1Y9 NOrtt1lY1RT NVl !rT ro rOl. ? ??? ? plrgi rt?A yt yr W11W R M ttYOMO L ALLWK,iI.,l GCIrLY e,1N {.OCM.1A.rfoCld aNrl YY rINKUTIri Ca11rt.GT01 ewu mpTOwn YIN rIB.wY \ Nn L f:QeiLfiar Nrt OOIiCrid R r.L'IALK r+ore r ri-Yro1n tACL.1TT tanea? ?Trlr+. a caRrlulcrw WI.L1.wr DeMWr d rues rrtart ro rerrr 6iJY.T1ai rnWK 1 NNNIAMN P1ntiO1PY \!Mr LOC.1t01r R.W. mrtr rlrnrt ro ouvarw\ mtrtrcrol\ •aaa C4,rAGT Larx wwwana?T.u..te.iTw w?.rtlTelr resort ro rs?+urrna a rNOUaww?wrrNWMMW.. rlecollcT roowl'frNrlNiKlr YTL,I>W x,0.1 ro M wPWYe R MT Olr N11M M rtrNT.R?IY.'/. ?ocM. Ar+cr NaRwr1 prearrtlM orrmti+r eN.u r 11oTt? u MP,N N.WMY1 R NttYTw MiT wi\T6rla ? ' .. eolnw.erar olrti wvtt.N e+w mw m rtTOr w Rw.mw rnwn.r .al T•M 19VlItrNa , MrNT.Nw A:l OR1Nk wNNrG ITI01 ro neuN N rL.G1. WrOr MOW NIUC11r?1 TO MN41 MW Wiiei-16A1b reeOCn. earrllellClld AI?N MMLL r rr,e YiN wAMru rellwcaoar ? rilp OWtl CG 1NI?IRIW Ill.r? 1101® 011iIrW. M.l N?fr1fY orw.w 1uTw o.rl.rtr ort Iro.TO ro r1..a1eT M we NW1 r r1111ND TO M OIrINK caomai r M.COMtINGTart N AOGOIpMICf1 W M1 MYIIC.IMS t100r i ArMRrAVlrni.T N4N rWtrrorn as o.TVro Nirti r'. Imo' ,N11 IAf! rMlrr.i? r 11epOtW YrlrLT tr 1?1MM mi0rT?,ro TM1dMCYNetl NveAe.lrirkNO1®. : tYrr.GT wrel4w.k 1rC1Yr111' ro rlt OroNri wrl P ?. a rt 1r w.w Mw owr+cr Naeluw ?o w 11oot? rroc+ar orrew rornw ealrr+r. raAn r P w+n1 mera s or: NrItllN Y1N L.r\V rm1RIr11rVa?iD Wn\YtIn41M.M W 04 ?A01YW.YV niD R UlCrR M 111101 GrTN! 61vAnr @N M rlaorro Wr M rw,w ,vrlbr m Aomrnaa.\n rwa+1 wpae. row,.u. Nw cer P'w\IOrn rIr 1vr.entr rATew.W rtrMrt war P OWTM rr+ci w Iirr?. Aeovw awnrt MttlrA .pNf1 oM r' 41,Irek 40i WY, q\ N. rLTlpl AOCfrTAW ro M marct Merlrar d -Nn : rtn+o+>t e«ra.onw ores arraln Nro M'rwwm u1cNU..uolow To M+ro.en ,,.... caw ei a,aN,n b1N1 r aapclp N.roweoMw rru \oeW. •r.n..stowr.i rtrau.\mr . ,caner Mxs1o W,u?.ear row M,1'eiell? rueec L mcrla wNrl w ai mreem so ertru+srw rN an snrorw LRaw d wurw .. wTAUa a ?wwcraWU'<NUUrN.orm.Iw em+uTrr ®.,d R N.Taw. eaenrx rcex ..u..rrLle+ru uzAi e{enewx eno.. 0. Ml eIOR NMtl COTLY YIN L/.tX CaOri •al M CRY P 6J.IrMtr WlE REVOM DEECRFTION, i 73G06 C Of CLF ATER C0111ENT8 SITE Q z ?I 3'• EXISTING GAS SITE PLAN ecMa 1. r I R FE ts O W? Z ie H Z ?v a N o a 2 a 2 ? ? J Q 0 a LL O 11,,?? W Oz a = °W or.?v a a o _ LL f0 <q S i SITE & PARKING CALC;ut + •-+•-- yyM V. D•!%NTtb LAND MwA , y??jDD•N IT?p„W?t, IIIPr M M••V.O AGfM pwVATt TJY V Q IAND ArA KT ?? ttlal M ?A Q Ttt NiY TOTAt rAND .Y4 n1« V N eTi?T^?T tUrFA4 YicN N W ? 1H• nXK I.NC Arl'A hT•• M A w.DT tt•K! rD ?/rtf•' 1 t'AD? r?w• •eo v. aw v. w rArw•m p.?,cTN. . r ns• ? ?.w_iun.•roa?e ?iiiu.wr I?.H^?•r^ . I NOTES l /TDyp r NYIALL ttl?w Al Nr1r. «CG•pw M CQT4fr? ItrN? iJD1MrX R'R (?IN1f ?y? y N HOTDIM iNK iM6w« WwwMGY •ItR•OT,CNIOrY • ITltCM rTY Ir i L ? MT1Rt®NIMT[•W. BlG1wCJL Nb/,A MD tYT/{l ALL TH9Am IR4R VILV MNY 4LL VAtVq.6 Tlt TDOTt MTW1 TIR 'I {DUI{M WTNTI't•tM tMTALLA rwr . cxwn ra t.TNTM To r•wawr . Darr Trw . ur• m. ? ' wnw.eTa?+w•ni?u?Ar ««?r on c?,W.c ? «a?NOw w?ww :Titara.ra rn? L ORIGINAL RECEIVED N1 ! if If 4 iudp PLANNING DEPARTMEj PIPING LEGEND Na. DATE No. 1 3.28-0S CITY OF CLEARWATER ------------------- SUPER COMMENTS UNLEADED 2 7.26-06 CITY OF C COMMENTS I MERE9'CCERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN AND T. E N I..I'E' Pi.Atlt MATES 0 rworarr ,wo «wALL NRMRtli rrrxor Doiiu «N.l TR rTte» ruNrr«uunwopwrcT ns RDgIt DIM'NrYM61YA.L MTa1 WLDtD. •lW t «!Lt IIR ait. ? /!W? rRL ntTAL riAL ONDT 11RMM LDDATIwI MD RW ¦w.1L O!M r1Wt'Wt0 M TURD N OPTAACTgI Q rLNRltEitlwat0 M01Rl ?(yt•L.1ttT`iMMD 6Y. Vtl6I tdlAYe!!If#R. iMl[? R'tlpAl COM •?r T6 •RM TYtf T{IfK MwALL N®r TOO! tY •q TANC rairOMi! Millr'IYSED•M MlalEYal rU nYRmw rwna, ru w rraw? tires WOIr N tRt N rL AR TAw tVM N %T.M« ,1py/?, yrd JADIQ6 i h M tR lYPI• y TRAY t•OIN I10 y WK DmCiOIM © NMi MatlRfq /0.LA1pi1tlT M19?t•NNT riAOlf? ? rrT H K11 gTAt. rrtD.ts ro wTAU r?rs r»Tr mlan raP o •r Aa tmN r arR.w nrWa nNa vsrt ur. © H}M?• NM rlltwtA tr rD6w1 DRAL W >4 © MR•MWIH'Nt'A•TK KMC TAME «.Af rtRaiTD W4 wl.IiAlt • W OG.lAb1 WV. M! TANK rT4l DRA4! PIK ON GNtTYlpOrttlt rY OrrRt• O nCrCt•ttWlALL rYMwIMFwYtaD KCI? lY NY W.(?Ct•YYTi A N10Lf? rUt? /RMD! W D.91D IRrO(IK I1?1•riLMWb ® ?•IHI?gtDD YM?1 RIfR ?N © tmR O MYlwir ® wD•T. /LAiA 0 oav wrwrrrorRw«uowurD ® nRr. Taw ruwrtwr wt?Drt.rw? rww tra Rw+t aw Nor rawc? ® .«r w «w•r?r trrrr p 2?rwMtr~Trtaw TUn r «Nr aw NAN r? o CiT4e TrN•C tt u rat tMOr.Mta nAN ® Prtaar w N6Dratr wt•+rtw •r d tcw ',. ?. •rtorwtD twN6n © ? ?vViM ?ttlAwui.TA ? Q tRGAt1aN o riY Gw VADDe? r Aw+wlet NDtR ?wNw?Draw Tf aowoWl? wrN a11wa Du I.DDA :..i now w oatna «? «Draw. tr rrr Q z Twi'iiwn. or m rRU« « IEARWATER ____________________ NEW SINGLE WALL VENT UNE SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARE YME OR UNDER MY I CT SUPERV N _?({ ? 11006 JSNA R Wam §?: a rs?66 ?Q$ N N _ o ii 0« 0 I a z LL g m gW? F LL f r r. u.` ORIG RECENED N"OV 2 2000 WEST ELEVATION (EXISTIN(DIPROPOSED) NORTH SLEVATION (EXISTINGIPROPOSED) IL No. WTE NEVIBION DEBCRWTION 1 S?Y06 CRY OF CIEARV/?TER Come" 2 T-1606 G OR CIEM ATER COIBAEN EXISTINGIPROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS: 3/7g" ?a& uj ujz d ? a J < J ?S21W x? ?U 2 i yqO N O = J in Z ? ?ti oLL 0 o U, a n & a IL x iv = LL OW xOx ??FLL ?F SOUTH ELEVATION (EXISTINGIPROPOSED) ORIGI , at9 ''> OR, ' •°? ? OF GLEARWATF P. Rx „1 o Way Zz(rT wWao'4 ]YDdr ULUZWn gg<W =a I4w.ac,Mlt .Va,R>!D eliiG . e(•ALFP oR.uN.a z a a N W a I JFN LONGITUDINAL CANOPY ELEVATION = Gl .c.u, vs• . i r o D. n F . i^ 5 Wa y2K REC,F SED LIGHT V Z O j 'hQa ZW oZW LJ J? a x 0 ? __ N? Its e0 N? ,B pp O ? ? j 2? to aaV o.s• 'e W ? a d D. ?w a x >a t Ik _ N 4 W O ro W fAJ?? Q W N a W Q S• F LL UNO'T 0.8vATM:W MTl 4lWiluilW OLY. eYfvp W Z o a g 1- m.R,.?m,Q. eMY9itm slarec . aN?L® DIeMlH9! a No. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 1 X29-05 CRY CFCLEARWATER COMMENTS DROWN G.M CHECKED 2 CROSS SECTION CANOPY ELEVATION EXISTING SIGN ELEVATION DAJ-N TE cum AS 3H !OB number CANOPY ELEVATIONS CANOPY ELEVATION 5 OF 12 SHEETS „B N APPY FOODS PLAZA 0 ? >d-d Z • ORIGINAL RECEIVED w.. if317 o.?. P NING DEP .r CITY r OF GIEAJZWATFp .?.(? c.. «.... VKN W r.?.,,.?..? .,.?? .s.oQ+. ro ro. o r•rors®rws nuw as?oa ro rum+ oatt. wr?aw?.,rr to w suso srw uv..u ror' a rt.so wpb eonnn O.1RrLL wW erAenWaew VKN MI'M1I? W tMMTM Y006.L CVIAIIIr ? ? 4M? Y TI.X CPIG rT lIIRT Kns nou.rort rror w•.rca+?crw r.rM....c sar sae, » mw.or w' «aas.. wrrs.a ' rM•swens rswa • wrra+aw.ar rr?rM.suw ? Y41Y44 rV4ul.? nm'rre /I.r oMAUIr I.YI ycaso?roca+crm • nluK nV DISPENSER PAN DISPENSER a• r-r CONNECTION DETAIL KK6 w• . rr TRIPLE LINE PIPING BURIAL DETAIL. r.Kr w•.rr vaw swnos ro rum, swn. maaw.wrr C?Crr! Nvw K O(NM OafrrM r63. Or TWOC CPC errs .. ti nmu. r r - siecoho.wr rasa, -- --O O Vs SHEAR VALVE DETAIL rxn r.rr DUAL LINE PIPING BURIAL DETAIL. sc.WS• au• . rr waw rrx ro rum+ n,K. rq'oawr++v aRptn Nvl10 K rr+! Rl ar onw r twrx mic 'Aw SINGLE LINE PIPING BURIAL DETAIL. sxr w• • rr SECTION THRU SUMP SHOWING SUBMERGED TURBINE PUMP INSTALLATION scra. w . rr -osn.mcr..e-_ 0 ar (UY OOYi.Y'OG I I ?` W+Or,p MfO CY?t. _/// w. w ocaW CwC ?I N aonaG+r rsi • to vr'de rai+esr ys. ran'?cT .osru.-- •.rse.r eac inrn±ai ?, VENT RISER DETAIL scra w . rr SER CONNECTION & PIPS S h W<LL W ZZp ?`i t S2 ?U Z < N t Q 3 6 J W? < ? l u . map °g LL < y a) j6?r'' K Q S pLc $ W > U a FF ? i=3o ? ? n S t ? ? ?pgpg$ rir F?sa LL O O S DRO" O.M aEn. caa.i ap,+c ? it SHEETS ,orr w.n. ? K?ut rson urs rrr oerw. rr oa oaa? mcnanu. nsouo owarn rums or.+n ro» rr ca+e nwws w o.»s tarc ?.v.+a CONCRETE PAVING INFILL DETAIL r Or • r.r' M/4 » rYtur tbN. TQYMr1I}NY rraw mrwn wr u s?aoc? ,wwtt •avrku d wn r sr ar ? r rraoc me ran sus a.rs rs,4lCM ys?.a O 0-- r w r r•r (3) t VENT LINE PIPING DETAIL scu.e w . rr eKV. rrR iuci rou,aaz ORIGINAL RECEIVED f,10V 02 2006 111 14 p IP lip 114 STORAGE TA L G 7214 OaaCrRgll OP MQMM: T»1G.CW F•Pm tAtl`?!M'+P rwaF MM [ Mdrlm YraNNr Of aATaNW PaR MNI aORpN OF AatlIrtaC11MA1.0aAPWa aTANDAROa A. arM wpNwwNM Npd RWawapOawvpY.Npd WpHt. lApdw aNTpaapn Twr.a..maw aew wurpaa.rldpiw.asw D.1aaNP•Da1m ae.w.RR. pwap a rN.ro NlarM: NM IMFLfCTaD TArKAW launps w awAptl: adt oMtm.Wn w>: b p' a 2TT' Ni! a TAMK WACITY aN?tACNm1T(wmeprdpppww aarA baT toTK:SWaa apRa IMWAIID FOaC! taTWaaam a rMae reW ararp.aa.r TMalaa Rwwwa Asia 0. aawoRnm COpICRY1IE PADOaaAOa oValR Rael. TArw Lw:a1a N' aMaWa 7f a DppRa.a/' aN M•!JNlwaiWa. wwpwry rad w rpr war O /r e.a ara wp. E NNKFORMCONCAMOUDWSK; w.a•.du•atr•a.w.rc i WplAafMMdd4abaaa:ll• aNrrrda : /'at•a DT• ft4mdl4Mawe T,1Na wplWaMbaNSa eTWldwrwa NAMa r. SVTx oP oval!ulmll hww JppN1 TOMTAMWRY1NtllATNaw Aaova:T WW a ovaRpu TYaNNTaP aAWaI.OYRTANC AaaA (?Npdk ".mw ((M) (ST?92+o*w Nol of SUSIE-KV/2)+n D•mAawnw. h•mm.d d •depN d purld el •wapppp.w pW dwW Bt. nawwa ra:w M. wltl?wR IO.pNrMdWWNaI TAMIdd• aAN d N. TOTK WwWAap PORata: NwlwpB nwPrpr: M,tm Pump t P. Pal apOp anwpw Cwan•: NIm ConwwpOrd.Aan: T,iN/ awkla mvdapd:wn: p3,Mlap apodR p.rrpa w..: n,Tma TOTK WYW1wAap I011C6k 1"Am L TOTK UPVIAI1p PORCH I:wb awrawxaafa praaam): '""w J. SAFETY FACTOR (downward ft.-lmwld ro-y 1.12 aa" radar K AmaTm•acurwluTldN: dart Th maa•AmhSaG Rp:W RpaNRNap AaAaranONa or d wpraw:: a o...wsw NN aucrw - r se7-;R nvevdw o a>!>Ntdplr 0 a. atJW NAWI •. rWM[WNwp rwara aN r aerraPr < ?araaala U? w?YWTNlYLAlIMi ? Au?ila ?MaW A ? :wlnwsarr'Jq° aaliNL MANDATORY A Wlwl.,a.wp.Nrc ? u sn~ CaC4Z 7F FMTIN$ -L PARKING 9Y and -f- DISA mmrtw ONLY rNlpa rawAlaaNNa AUaaa aNWrWw ib• VIOLATORS HU AlrsawlNrlWWnauvt• 5E FINED $250DO METAL A IN W aW W 01[IINIrW T Wes' IK F SLAW MOT 61"" RE t M?1lIW?WIPWWL lYRNaIl/Ml?r r® rApmowlwWwr?awewrwrrrc lNNI . DISABLED PARKING/ ` aartoWWas°O N°"a.°'RW.? MARKING DETAIL NO ICALE Ch" INfTK_yL._TION iciuswm prr i R? Wai zz?fl wasi d? z J S2 IW S? ?V LATE REARM OESCRPTlCN i 721rM CRYOFCLEARWATER COIWAENT8 BUOYANCY CAI-CS, EQUIPMENT 8a DETAILS r? ?C _NO z a N O a ) J p ao? ! F z? i W a ; w ozg ; o ! a0aLL LL O YIV a 6 a 4 = l R n ??ppp tteQQp _ N?AA = LL q p J xx ?F?LL 2 DROWN SCALE A1. CK/EOU/o?S t OF 12 SLEETS HORSESHOE BOLLARD DETAIL r•..W-re ORIGINAL RECEIVED PLANNING DEFARTME a CITY OF GLEARATL' HS 2S W ` p? n < 4? Q LONGITUDINAL TANK BURIAL DETAIL: 10,000 GAL. r w'.I- e CROSS SECTION TANK BURIAL DETAIL p - r-r 'mLL mo < N O < J? S " 2 ?We <O i?+ At ? v LL5 X? w Yv a a x a ?n p x LLpp z$F S UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK DETAILS uS'I 2 $' r s e OF 2 SHEETS PUMPS w ENONLOBURE ...rw •0.1 FLT MMt?ale Ywa n\rrt'?,?.?^v?f?;j??j?' `- i r • tae ?WDU 88ECTIONCLOSURE . rw N'TMO M ? j / j M ? I I r I ® ENCLOS EneL4 QEUDEDUMPSTPLA ER RN -.- ORIGINAL, RECEIVED J V 0 2 2006 DETAIL CONSTRUCTION NOTES PLANNING DEPARTMENT roMr?cr,u ro e1. a rw NooFwo new a• inT CITY OF CLEARWATER naa r mic.. uavt Frw , wn uRrr.aion ©.R, eT Yatp ,aar,.... Qo rt.•x,• m nw,rr. Qi 'nMeavw vx vw Nlwer.warn our uan ruts ? rreorioo r auac m war ru w. Nrnta C/w rlT. O1 MOrwp O?Q?M-i•Yx Yw NNRt.warD M,rp a1w•• OODrt rt arovn, Y ewer. MAi w•a eMllYe ro /•x/• ?1Q. R rD i11G ®NOr tY1FD ONIIIMII? ®v aarr. w r or/r, e.a• rcw rcnw ®nr s'r•+h• m t+r aF artr war ®Fr• n Mar.1YCU awe /'x„x'/' m MS we `wer. r?ner'wr, 77 m. ? Mraswr rw nro oac nro ®on. rt o wrotr,ree wrw rw•w eNaoNaa Fxrura ?alr. rnuer or wnw Fr:oaen rx•xM-m nr sae ?u. s•n wwowT rox. n+. 1•?o,9d,• m Aa?,?ow wr Mn awaler Hies, r9!•. rm eta.,,M,cn e:,ra ran mr?ownrq r-rvxrrlxrevrrN PY ®?o?,Q>i rarr v .star ur r v-a,a-k•• eo ®Nm mr ?arnul .wer n n•an ro. ? ro rar.1 v.aNrr yr r+F-ua-7b• m ro rn wnr w.ro lac ears ®eHar rao nae 1oc.vara ®auK n rx/• ror Fun ®e•ata mrrc. rt rxv Me.1,un m' ?Y `? • No LUTE NEVISIONOESCRIFF&- AJ 1 32*-W d OF CLEAF W TES ! . COMMENTS TRASH ENCLOSURE d wasw BOLLARD DETAIL r-r DUMP8TER ENC108URE FF1WOM ELEVATION . w ®i DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATION W .rw. UN" SLffiT _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - _ - , ? NYIM rwf N -? E ?? (( AtR+u. i I <I ?) g ] q g O M6Rl i I @i i ? It '' II'' ?o?YdvNw aoowN AULA-1111?1?¦ ONION erar -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,?} J6 NYIM rrd wP>N = IAN ? _ ?i AtAYJ p ? k ?• b i I i 66 ? . LINE UTILITY PLAN ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 2 2006 PLANNING DEP TMEN 1 CITY OF CLEA ATER EXISTING UTILITY PLAN NOTES va 7aoAno6 o Au mal+r ua. r AirRwaua .wr, M•xN ulN ? are o menwwiw nal.o 6ww wws OrrWrr6. REVIEIONE ' By i i O aN mo- na<w[NOVAlR 6Nd?116 LOGAlO ,,.. BM= _-_ -_-_-_-___- L4 W S d ?n t ?m? are Qr YI ?? S N?11.7 m y? t7 zZlE l In +i '? ?i3a ,; zl I < N . ._.. .. _.._.._.._.._... Y J J rdRNw fassN r ?' P N. DATE FWM*N CIEARWATER 7 3-2606 My Of pWM8 J a? ? q I \\ ?J 2 1@6-06 WG RCtEARWATER MY OF Comwi j g u SANITARY A Z LINE UTILITY PLAN 0 H ? a LL , ( _ ws rwr roAN Rs A7RYtl ?I i A7RllAi R~ ' t k ? b O 6w7d i I I ?.rdr _..,N>N J GAS LINE UTILITY PLAN =< f51 LL UTILITY LEGEND ? a S; ----------------- UNDERDRAN S 1. Y ? 6 U stoat tn+t (PRrvATEy --- - - - - . - BANrrABY LINE (PRtgO• as d a i d' EIETARY ED MAN S ---------------- WATER LUTE -o O- o D RAW WATER LOU OI' CC - - - - - - - ABANDONED OAR UNE -:, o- 0 0 EM PRERBURE OAE __... y-- YY _ STEM CENTER LURE ` O SANITAEY CIEANOUT SANITARY HINHOL[ S LL ia(? _ ? R^ LL ® EDGE PRESSURE CAS VALVE S ~ e WATER VALVE ® GAS TEST HrATION GROWN GM OTJL PEE HYDRANT ASSIMMY CHECKED ¦ OAS ANODE MEDIATOE jAS G UTILITY PLAN EXISTIN ! y ORIGINAL RECEIVED W z z d zd ..I x x x a O z UNION STREET PmwM s'w aPaRA. NO 0 2 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEW CITY OF CLEARWATER iCAL.EE I- - 20'-0•• I 0? I LANDSCAPE MATERIALS LIST R I > OV Owm WSwb?. U.. OeR al•, 10 aM %a' C[ Cw+acapN. .r.wW Cnm Wllm..ea M. 1D PaA %A'v.. 24d 2S M 'M mwglwae Nuwa n..PMtmN PWn d0. mM. f0 --A (,A' . ,6') a u laaw.,rem?M .Mm p.P. Mrn. TANM.wi to a+m r an x 4-r RR.. (PatlNaEO ral .a M R.PNM.PM Ewb. 'AM.' O.mf F•m Nwwan S Pow a0..4 th YS YDwnwn wwmwra S.PwnAw MumwP x ?• N' - A+M m w. W ... u UE tI,PP. mwvvi Lwry.m pmt' ONnt UrIPP. i qwm. 21 o-c 9m P.wW net.Wn Rw,M SM : LANDSCAPE REQUIREh1E M PEJE M CRY V pEMTUIER LNO DCYEIEFYENi KQMI%RIS m0 NpNA1D ATFwIL -rn {f ,pR pF 8054 W1gL UsE NIEA (v.U.A.) ro K - 211.T Y mK PEP a• v . a ,lm ,ap, aRnss . cplTwuas KDK .RO.OED of % .,o _ 2,u s S REFS - aF THE FplaYMa ; M . WYa% 2 P110POKD SHADE iR® (2 Ep1-TT iRFEl) TRFf/1ao SWME iFET Di KQw1ED p1m13PACE s PwPOKO PMA, TKES (: EaRNAlnIr y,az s J. - az, v s PEMP08m Acme rKES <, EgRYALLNT TKE) ?, aaRMr. sOR KcuRRD DKnis?AM MO WOMt4R aE,MI K UT%!IID Fdl KpIWCD i 111EE POt % ii . piED1YAQ w tLU LF RIME ooR wIMIB! _ 2PROPOa TREESSIUOE- cpTREES (2 t2 EP ? T!E F ? w 2 `ZT W40) tRFEw fACAMS fACMO R.aw -1 - i•0 V • PEKPmM ED PAW iKES (2 E0.NAtdT S) 2 PEAMTwo wDT, . Soo SF MmPOKD ACCFNi TRESS <, Ep1NAlENT TRkE) a' 2 ACCEMT TREES W3 PAU1S PER .0 V - 13 PPM tK1:S DR DDVATt• LAIC IIEr ApISD?IDV• , 911R1E PER 20 si AWTAW p Y. E%pLIK Of AO4SSWAY . M wY{ 4RRM5 AND WR tlIpA1DWWt . EOIf1N iyy if TREE PER % V - . RIECS oa wWws - ca,.wws NFDK vROwMD GENERAL NOTES i. Ml tAMSOAPE YAIEMK Sl.wl K RdbA IMAt GRAM K KTTER AS SPEtr,m N aAO2T AED STMOAMIB iW rA.wsxr i.Aati PARTS ? uw E sY THE pwsax aF Piny wousmr, W.OaDA DEPAaTUEN1 a ApbpA.TlNE AND CdM•EN KRwaa A,o suLL CDErpW TD cuRRSrt ANEMCAN ASSOCUINRI 6 MWSQYNAM BTNOMDS FON NURSERY STOIX. tA1NSC/FF uATEMAI inAU K.wsTAUm AsconpND ro souw NuRKRr MADRMS 2 ALL KasrO P[Ip1ETE1, 81RnR1 MATEMAL SMMl K A tmwTUU Of ,r ,IODHT AT TK THE W aIaTALLA- Aw SPACED HO pIG1FN MM m' • _j lOwEa MSfAUASW K P'ROPOKD SIMUBa w1All NOT AD'.QMRY wP m- - bT SKiF,18 91AtL K FE1D ADJJStEO r NEOESS.WY. } ALL KpR,EO TREES SHALL K A Mxww Df ,o fT. O,ER/!! H wM A i MwMw 2-11r TRUNIt CAUPFA (uFASURW r FRpI ptAM AT TK iNE R! M,wTwa roDaar TREE wcATMws As MEMSURY ro Awo cpRUCTS wry, . ) UIYIES. cesmlroTwMR ETC REf[R ro uATE1aAtS SpEW1E fOR ESACf SKGMCAT,o,15, i a wroPmm TMIS SI1All K tACATED A Mauro ar s FEET FRW NMm2CMEi [,avdTS sHRU•a SMALL K sPAMD A AwEAaRr a z PEST rMxl HAR••g?r ,. nnlons (..4 BU%DHDR wuxs CURBa 01tlTE5. ETC) a A PUMP MO WDl VNMRORIXMD IRIROAIKw SYSTETI 91ALL K INSTM1i ?' ro vRO.,A mp[ Cp•RARZ AND/M uAAETAw TK lM1DSOAPE ARG N A ,EK1HY NMIPIER. 0. ALL PVN1wW SHALL KWIpRD 31111 A IwMWY Y LATER. . TK WwSW[ CdiRACTpf SHALL SOD ASL pSTUR•FD AREAS. a. TfE Cb1/RACTpE E RESPONSIwF FM tK CILNAW M THE PRElaSES NO 1®mVK K Nl OtlCAlwm AMD WRMDS WIEMNS MID MwB41. I ) 0. t11E IMIDSCAPE CpMRACipt SHALL '.OBEY THE IACATONS Oi EaTSMO _ TMS} swiss. AMD uwls PMOR ro wsrAUATMw ar PROPORD YAtEMAiT, E%AAKWB 1iATMaMS 91CH A4 ROCNR N piAOM A rDE.A rIRDINO WipbK; OR AMT OTTER YATEMAAS MAT MY KA KR11EMt m 1K HEIlTM Ci TK RAlIi YATFMNS still K aulolED. t0. M uNDSCMC ComACiOR SNMI KCWE ApxIMNiED wM RELATED SItE •/RMfl1p11S. MCI.tgR10 SIZE MADR14 PAWNa AND Ml UlIU1K5 (vATETt KKR. POROI C•°F ETC) ro MECWDE AND usuxDERSTArnwca Mo ETEWWE A iROUREE FKE wSTAU1.iMYL -Y 41M,CCTNrY i. TK OUCT wCr,TMw d EMSTwO A1D PRD ulMnaRDtRO uTUTEa, Aw PIPES. cTa, wT rwT K As wdCATm d T1E A THE pG3RKS THE Cp11RKR%1 siMl K DESPONSIWE m MTF lDCATaM s nr8 MEETS AM T 40Mp1Ci KE NORM w A MANNER ro PKSWT WIEPoRNTOM oR -AM TO ExMDNO SYSTEMS wtld W1ST REYNI 6QAIMNAL 1K CON111ACTOR 41ML PROTECT E1DS,WO SiRUCT1RE3 MD URRY SEA'AQS wad WST M]IAw OPERAIKWK AND 91ALL K REEPpEEIt FOR IiEW RpAR/KPtAmE11T r DAMAKO By ww HAWS 12 CONtRAOTfIR IDIMl CALLA STAR W-CALL AT tE.AST .- PMa m MTr E%FwvAtwrl ArnwTr. <,-eoo-.a2-ano) T} p1ANT11ES pl OWl THE FKDEDOIM OVER MTEMNS UST. OUANTTES pl YATEMAE9 I1ET AK MON1ofD A$ A CWIMESY paY. iW RNW KMIR ntarnE - EowTt ,n• a HuD FROND SOOfB m KMAw ,20 M ,20 DEC ACT. M Q rA Y a ''s= 2 o T (A i/Y pAYEILR RONfplRD Msn INK/ r wM..N? O ta) nAaua tAx uAwmw A'r3?" a UYTM P •URM trEUwm AT PowT ar mwORn T- Y . C YooD WA.T (M ca) ? r r a. M Iii ;ICs . 1 P KT%pHIHIC?K r?C6"LL8 is 4NDE S.KA. Y M?1Dt UKR?IITy WNER wK m t Y-s• SK fMnR . RaoT •Ml K(r Y/a-p. P[A.T ?•nM E%DMA 8A r Mud .A- r ..• . aP aOm arME rn o.RUw TIMmrM tmtw Bra zw, ? DK,MR Ya r.M'/EY ?M.OOKw? A Npi WAP?r?r?. ,D w M !R m f1 RT0 ,RK lTRWrDIT RWl•ML OI U1wS,laEm RDl ? . . a3' W01•ML DIAw[TQ Il w SHI2UBd GROUND COVER PLANTING DETAII. TYPICAL TREE PLANTING TYPICAL WASHINGTON PALM TREE PLANTING @tlE wl, %% It•R E? L•wt ? LM4113-ITN •?•REOa•m N A E?Wa" 1':'ai H W ? W iT W 2 a N ?333Ej a Z JS W y ?zo Z O? !~0 LL a ogW LL S i W Y?C) ? n« ? a a ? S L R ! ? A oQ$ .? E T ., i- 0 CROM t1 OF t2 &1178 I 1 tEBE E / ORIGINAL RECEIVED UY 0 2 2006 t (L zz 7 d zz 5 x F a 0 z Px sw rw uD Eu_ P? BNL VNVE 1691 F1LiErt RAM OON 5fP69 vNVE wIRE WrME CrUai - - .A - _- 1V111nIlli N5 CWtl RESSURE RFGUUTOrt TO SPRNA0. _ II' BO wWIF. cowrRa wRFJ UNION STREET 19 /9 t9 18 to /9 YNN LNR u?N. w Px mtMc DRIP ZONE CONTROL VALVE .' NLtCN U 1/Y MSEIrt TEE w rUBNO - 'K •• - 20'_0^ ePPrat? M - Pn: ra (srO P.c aR Yw PVC - DRIP CONNECTION PLANNING DEPARfN ff RwGAT'oN LEGEND' - WARa BRD leoe KPoES PoP-uP w/ 1e• NozzLE (AWC A5 NEEKO) -QTY OF CLEARWATE ' o a .7, WAM tie Wae POP_UP w, .2 N022 E NEEKD) WRXM PROPERTY UNE. n RAW ENO te06 YRKS POP-VP w/ ,0' MDIZtE (MC A5 NEEDEU) ,q ?- . RAUr Pono leoe sEwES PoP-w w/ e• NozzLE 4`RG K N[mm) -_ • wwl eno leoe suKS roP-uP w/ 1s• smv Noz. (AWC As NEEOEO) _- i 9 NINREW POJ-06 PMT q?tL WOrOW W/ 1.0 ?Z (IAC AT MCEOED} 1 1 ® FR1NiErt PGZ-OS PMT CwCtE ROICR w/ t.e WZ (AWC AS N[EOEO) 1 p WNrER PCO-W PART GWCtE ROTOR w/ Z.0 NOZ (MC AS NEEDED) i 1 B WNN BIM POA-100 1' REIIOtE CONTROL VALVE T FJ-y'13 ® tEWYWF?TXW PORrT Di SOARE wME fROY IRPOr J11 CONTROLLER Y ) 1 { ?L ELL w/ 1 IW SU8E1EA?tE PWP ® ? W ? { (Pop O AiP WMED) 1 I i E W r to © w NNPoWKTER?^N?1?E55 ww-amN coNTWauR 1 1 wWaA LAN NO, 1 ILNRI tCO - SLN M PVC ?UNItBS 01NCINRSE WEWMFD BY LL CODE) - 51zE0 AS iMDRAtEO ---_ l1X i i . 1 UTfPK LBIE -PVC C1A53 te0 {LMtE35 OiN(IM15E KWIRED eT LIX'K C ro K SlZEO NOT TO EXCFEO A vELOCRV OF 1 1 1 1?lww lY? E 5 FPS MD NN(. W ID55 M 2WIE LWIES WT TO IXCEED 10 OF OPfMTMO P9 - wW1YVY MPE 513E TO 9E 3/a• 1 ?? SlEEV1N0 -PVC SCN w (SEE 1WR1GT0r NOTES irM SIZMO) 1 ( ?._. _._ RNN BRO /ID-M-13 M-Lka PRESSURE f.OYPEN9Ai1N0 DM TUBMO ' IB qNN B.w PG-ice REMOTE CONTROL WtL4 sA. w/ DiRtro-1w 1rew Furor AND PRwzsr6-xs Kaxnrar 1 w ? Parry a coNNCCTmN - Pvc ro OPoP ruewo , . WAR. BNro tM. BUBBlFJ1 ON P.C FLE11 PPE TWEE Pow1 BRD nN,o ,/2' r6iE ArYPtFR pr ~ •-Fitlt PmE z UiWI LME TEE TREE BUBBLER DETAIL IRRIGATION NOTES: 1. YNNU.10r CONiR1CrOF SNNl EXERGKE WE SO AS TO N 0- E%ISWMC UINIrNS. XiWOMNi COMWAtroN SNALL w- EXKONG ?Txm co- W 2. .Nx. YNN ( M 5NN1 K &1PoED AT A pEPO1 TO -E A MNWYUY cou a te'. 361 uTUN. wE MPNIG ro n+LC n wwlNN1 corER or ,3'. 1 IRRIGnON CONTR" TO K RE9PWLBLE Tai NL ELECRt1CX HOUK-UPS. a. 9UPPLT MWiG SNNl K iLUSNEO TWEE ALL DINT, OE.PoA ANO LNYPS PPoOR iO 1NE MSrAIUTXNr W THE BK FtaY PWEVEN+OW. s, slESVS SINLL K KotXKO unDER Au 510E1wYR4 Arro DRNEwen. YwouY Sl£EVE mre SwLL K 2'. •. t2' MCN POP-UPS SNNt K USED w ML SNRUBBERI MEAS. SUPPORT TK WKER WTM A /5 WEBM STAKE ANO NYLON CMIE TaS. >. ALL 2. YAT MN fP0E1 iK IMOTM)N CpRROLLEW TO T11E REPUTE COF010 VALVES NNL K AYq 91ZE -E UE ONKCT BURVL. ANa.C SrWAND 3ME. LAKES ME N K BUNgEU roGEfNEW THEN ra0 ro ME .DYraY of rNC ww ua PVE w/f1[5 Ar B' NrENVUS. LANs euPom YAPo LME MPE SNALl K MKWTED IN t/r a teo rwdacs w / ry 1 f L ? ,? , ? PVC MPE MO Wn?CV wOH n YWIIIUY CO.£W 6 te'. B. WICATOI CORfPKtM SNILL NAK TK 8•CKFLOw PRLVEMWI TESTED K A Cg11i1ED lEC1WLYR. 9. BAC1ULPw PREVENroR 4NALL K RSfiD AT 1E. Si .WNWLLT. 10. REFER ro na IANDYAPE MAN NI11pr 111ENCNINO TO AVOW TREES MO SHRUBS. ALL PVC RPMC Fpl 11ANWNE , xEfNEe AND PoSERS 9HN1 K SCN, .0. Tt. Nl OnaR PIP•q SNNL ? CUSS BO Wt 200. ,2. AU PoP-uP WoraWS AND sPWAn SNNL K .rsrAUm usrw M te' FtEx PNC CONNECMXi. 1J. AORIST ALL NOzzm TO REa1R 'M1ER YAASiE ON NARO SUIe'ACES MO wN 15. ,.. iNROTnF vuvES oN xWAY zaNn M WEaaKD ro PrtEVENr Foocwc. tS KPoOAIwN CONn SMALL PREPME M AS-BLNLT OPA'MNO W REPWOOtKRRC PAPCte swO3nrrG ALL MSTALtA11ar nMT DEU"SlES TROY THEE ORiNwrCS. 1NE AS-BUTT seL4 t. LOCATE Nl W+r uNE MPwO. cONtROL wNas A«o vAlm w slawNrG EXMT YvsuwrENre FMW Nvro swFAas . ie. VALVQ OITf VKVw3 Na QUICI( CWPIYIO WLVCS 91NLL SE METALLED VKVE BOXES VILVEBO%ES BwLL HAVE A WN. J' BCO a' PEA CPAVEL. t T. ANY PIPWO SxOwN OlR59E tNE MIOPERIY -E OR RtIMNiNO OlRAOE A 1Ar1DSCAPm AIBA K A1bRN MOTE TOR CINXT' aRY. All tRa4 SHALL SE W15rN1ID cN na PROPERTY oW wart a wn Nor NawE THE IARDSUPc MEAS te. ALL wKRS SHALL BE -CD A W1. Or 12' FWOY ANI SIOENAII(. PAM 011 WOAD. ?-.... 1•. EXACT CONiNOUER LOf1O01 ro K COOWO nD wRN M OwNER•S gEPWE5ENUINF PwOrt TO MSinllATXM. 3D. PWePEw.T crtwNO rya mrrtROUxrt ro A s/B' x B• c?PER cuo cRDUNO ; WOO wTTN Aw0 S BNE SCtE) COPPER w1RE nLL SPLICES AND CONNECTOR 10 Ti[ 34 KK? CONTROL W1K SNRLL BE YAOE WfrrH KING TECHNaOCY JS ! YM[ CIXelECTOR. 21. ALL PIPE " FOrMCS S K M M.COWDNrCE w1TN LGCK CODES. 22. INSTALL pK TUBWO'T GRAK AND COVCA 'wRH YULCN. iTPMJl SPACMO ral atlP rtl&N6 K B' i0 3.' di CENTER. SPACING i0 K AONSrED ' , FW MART utwr. REFER ro LANDSwE MAN. MCeIOR TuBMC EVERT to WT1N i3 L01K P{.ASDC TU9N0 S[MES, ? fifi F; iP1" WER. kLL1£ BWI iB.4N WK i pO? ? NNAt 9a1 I?IPPI[ -NNNUC 9CFl NI P.C iRiwG CONTROL VALVE 71 NrtN GMK awl axm teas POI-uP aW_w-r pafCWma ?? ?SfRp1!" f1N. 5CN ? p? SwEEi 61 Sal N PLC TEC PA' UrFRK LMf POP-UP TURF SPRINICLER ? nAroN Nu.Dr ?i mu?w ?,?\ ?? 22 - YwloNX Pu YR«WC IY. tta Irw! "' " Y B73RM vrEC,vt nffiEaunaE cum