Loading...
FLD2005-05045r Gleam,-'ater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 Q SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION (3 SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans O SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ _ t CASE #: --------------------- DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: -_-?_-- SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) --PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS: ry /f_-!,_- 53 4, / 2"_ PHONE NUMBER: L_-y 1 _ FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): D AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4.202.A) AGENT NAME/; AZ0__6. ?Z!/ MAILING ADDRESS;(_.(Z / __j_ J 43t -.? -(33 7S-: 5 PHONE NUMBER: 72r? FAX NUMBER: ----?? -_ _ CELL NUMBER: 'la 7 70 E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Cod Section 4-220?2.A) ? STREET ADDRESS of subject site LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (if n I' ted h re, please ote the to tlo of this documen 'n the s itt PARCEL NUMBER: 06 5 ZQ/'S -- PARCEL SIZE: -- (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S) (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) ac sheets and be sppeeci}ic when identlfyir4g the request (include all requested code devlatons; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) jUL 1 PL"ING DEPARTMENT (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signat&,4) on page 6) CffY OF CLEARWA 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVI SLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES -__ NO - (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) 3- SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provlde complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. --------- ----- --- --------------------_----_ - 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. .11A ? 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including yisual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater 0 4 51-'p'rovide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) --------- --------- ------- ----- 1 The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. I-Z 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Li 1%r3X1rr1 amok Ct JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infili 2005- City of Clearwater n v E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design C Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. Ail applications that invoi addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with t City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. 0/ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. _ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ?? Dry COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (j (SWFWMD approval is required prior to Issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? A knowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. UPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; REE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; .?LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; i RKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; de-/GRADING PLAN, as applicable: ?APRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) Cj/SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;i' All required setbacks; ( t All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infiil 2005- City of Clearwater • E Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. W SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; __ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and F or area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/3 X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; M Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4.1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; - Sight visibility triangles: _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripiines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, Indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/I X 11) (color rendering if possible); IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. JUL 11 2005 ,, , C ORIGINAL CnY OF CLEARW f 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infili 2005- City of Clearwater i E 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infll Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infll Project. H Ja' BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; CI REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/ Section 3.1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. Ail PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/1 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: \ • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727.562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway AS ach turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the nd signed, acknowledge that all representations made in this appli do are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and auth iz City representatives to visit and photograph the property des ib in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS c? rn and subscribed before e this 4 " _ day of _ A.D. 20 to me and/or by oo? _ E s personally known has nrnriw-ari A.1 /1 as of property owner or representative Ndtary public, - My commission expires: at'??rrU°4s DO IT8*3-WTARY? MY COMMISSION DnjlPIR ES:Octoher t.i 7.t GL FL N L N may sorvice & 80ftn2, ins, Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Inflil 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 03130/2005 10:35 727446,.36 NORTHSIDE ENG S1- PAGE 03/03 CITY OF CLEARWATER AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT PLAMING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AI MMISTRATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, loo•SbUTH-'MYRTLE AVENUE, 2" FLOOR PHONE (727)•362-4567 FAX (727) 5624576 Ronald E. Kozan and Karen- L; Kozan (Name at an ptaperty owners) 1. That (t am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: 2, That this property constitutes the property for whtoh a request for a; 1' avers dfrust) 3.jJTha,/t/the underal nod (has/have) appointed and (does/dc) appoint?? ? m 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described prop"; 5. That (i/we), the undersigned authority, hereby cart; th f fy .repo; to tr a and correct. amNrPor~ HwAs- ??...- m the undersigned, an of er duty comma (fined by the taws cf tho tats, offy?. personally appeared ,v/ on this day of d sat and says that helshe fully understands tha oanterrt8 ai theme devlt t at he s gmed. a hevtng been first duly swam My Olbmmitslon !expires; ZMarifllyyn SEAL" oN?tery Public a Salzman g; Ur airinn B; tppllopllonfixmddeatelapmantrani QntOS/2I/?005 RECENC 11 2005 ORIGINAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT I OF CLEA ATE (Address or csnerat L= n) • 03/30/2005 10:35 727446bu36 NORTHSIDE ENG S4_.1 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter will serve as authorlxatlon for & s .G-„Iat?vurea with Nor&side PAGE 02/03 Engineering Smiees, Inc. to act as an agent for Ronald E. and Karen L. Kozan and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the constnxtlon on the property generally toted at 405 Island-Way, Clearwater, Florida lying within Pinelleg County, State of Florida Y Ronald E. Kozan Karen L. Kozan Sign of Property r Print Name of Property Owner 23 Camelot Drive Address of Property fawner (603) 654-2445 Telephone Number Oak Brook, IL 60523-1733 City/State/Zlp Code State of . -, The foregoing instrument was aoknowiedge before me this ? 4 day County d?Q? u by as who is personsily known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an aath. (8tgnature) Notary Public 'OFFICIAy SEAL mmission Marilyn A. Salzman Notary Public, State of Illinois I$ on Exp. 05/21/2005 (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) RECEIVED JUL 11 2005 ORIGINAL 0 PLANNING DEPARTS CITY OF CLEARWATER • 03/30/2005 10:35 7274468036 • NCRTHSIDE ENG SVCS LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter will serve as authorization for ffQjMb Cbovste with Northeide PAGE 02/03 Engineering Services, fqc. to act as an agent fore, and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 11 lying within County, State of Signature of Property Owner K ??? Print Name of Property Owner 9W'? & ,cGOk/0/4 AvL. A/0V 8?3 ? 3 - ? Address of Property Owner epho a Number [LAM. Pr, City/State/Zip Code State of -L)? (Q/1` The foregoing instrument was aoknowiedge before me this County of LLSc2CL4?f day , by C ho is pers 4 110Y known to me o o has produced as ident'rfir n and who did (did not) take an oath. Notary public RANNINGDEPARTMEW CITY OF CCEARWATER 0 ORIGINAL* RECEIVF,!: FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION JUL 11 2005 Residential Infill Project EXHIBIT 'A' PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT: 405 Island Way CIPY F CLEARWATE DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S) To raze a 26-unit multi-residential apartment building and construction a 26-unit attached dwelling unit with on-site retention and landscaping. The site will consist of four buildings; (2) building will be 4 levels over parking, 4 living units each, total 8 living units; one building will consist of 2 levels over parking, two living units, and one building consisting of 4 levels over parking, 4 units per floor, total 16 living units. Front setback from 10-25' to 15.5' to pavement and 20' to the building; a reduction to the side setbacks from 10' to 5' to walkway and 10' to building in accordance with Table 2-404 "MHDR" Residential Infill Project. Increase in height from 30' to 45'-11" from BFE. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL 1. The proposed redevelopment project will be in bulk, scale and harmony with the surrounding area. A proposed similar project going to CDB in July is consistent with the current redevelopment project, across the street is a high-rise condominium building and all along this corridor is mixed use, residential ranging from mid to high density residential units The current property is over 20 years old and in need of improvement. The development to the south is in similarity to this proposed development, townhomes and condominiums, four over parking. The parcel to the west is a 16-story building and the property to the north is a two story building. All adjacent properties have side setbacks of 5' to pavement and 10' to the building, rear setbacks from 18' - 25' to the building and front setbacks from 0' to pavement and 21-60' to the buildings. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The current 26-unit which was built in 1962. The existing building is mainly taken up by an asphalt driveway leaving no area for landscaping. The only landscaping on the existing parcel is around the rear of the building near the pool area. The proposed development will enhance the area, leaving larger landscaped setbacks.. The proposed development project will impact the adjacent land and building by an increase in value. Current the site consists of run-down apartment dwellings with parallel parking, and back out parking. Island Estates is going through redevelopment of the older units in this neighborhood and property values are on the rise daily in this area. 3. The proposed development consist of residential dwelling units which are consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. The development will eliminate back out parking and have a much larger setback to parked vehicles. This will eliminate any safety issues with pedestrians walking on the streets. With a newly renovated building, health issues will also be alleviated as to asbestos problems, structural problems, etc. 4. The proposed development will not affect traffic. We are consistent with the same number of units that are existing. There will be one entrance and one exit. There will 0 0 also be a circular drive at the entrance. At the present site, two curb cuts exist off the right-of-way along with parallel parking running along the sidewalk. Currently 26 parking spaces are on site for the 26 apartment units. With the increased in parking, elimination of backout and parallel parking and a one-way in and one-way out, this will minimize traffic congestion. Currently residents are coming and going out of both existing curb cuts. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. The redevelopment is a residential facility which is consistent with Island Estates. Immediately to the north of our project is another proposed development of condominium units. This will comprise of townhome buildings and a condominium building. Setbacks are in likeness of our proposed building as well as height. The block where this development is to take place on Island Estates is compatible with other condominium buildings. We have a mixed height from 16- story, 2-story, 4 over parking, 8-story. No one building is the same as the other. 6. The current design will have no adverse affects on adjacent properties. Landscaping will surround the property. With retention being on-site this will eliminate overflow into the right-of-way and adjacent properties. Site visibility triangles are being met not only at the ingress and egress, but also along the water. This is a residential building and this will eliminate any acoustical problems and all trash will be confined in the building until pick up date to eliminate olfactory (as well as this not being a restaurant). ORIGINAAL RECEIVED .1111 . 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY F CLEARWATE 0 0 RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA 1. Minor setbacks are being requested for the current redevelopment project. Level I application requires a front setback of 25', we are 14' to pavement, but 29' to the building, the side setbacks are for walkways only, we are holding at 10' to the building and the rear setback is 15' to where we are 18' to the building. 2. The fair market value of abutting properties may very well increase due to the demolition of a building built in 1962 which has no improvements done to the property, minimum landscaping and possibly in poor structural condition. The current fair market value of the property per the Pinellas County Property Appraisers Office is $1,450,000.00. After construction and site improvements, the redeveloped project will have a fair market value of approximately $40,000,000.00 3. The proposed redevelopment is for residential units which are permitted in the MHDR zoning district. 4. The proposed use is attached dwelling units which are compatible with adjacent land uses. Island Estates is a mixed use community. Condominiums, apartments, single- family homes, commercial and office. The area of the Island Estates where this proposed development is to take place is surrounded by condominiums. They range in height from a 2-story to a 4 over parking and a 16 story building. Being of the same use and all properties having approximately the same setbacks, this would deem this property compatible with the surrounding already or designed buildings. 5. The development of this particular parcel will upgrade the immediate vicinity. Currently next door another residential project is going to be going before the board. The current site and surround sites, which are all apartment units, were all built in the 60's and have not had proper upkeep. Island Estates is under redevelopment. Many of the older buildings are being razed and redeveloped. This will be the sixth project making an improvement to Island Estates. Currently the site is non-conforming. It does not meet FEMA regulations, City codes as far as parking, setbacks, etc. Eliminating parallel and backout parking in itself is an immediate improvement with all the walkers. 6. Absolutely. More and more older units are being redevelopment in the community itself. The architectural style will be in character with the neighboring units, although they are all unique in themselves and no one building matches the style of another on the Island. The rear setback by code is 15', our building will be 18' from the seawall. 10' setbacks are being met to the building. There is a 5' setback for a sidewalk in order to gain access from the stairs to the right-of-way and to the rear docks. In MHDR, the code on height ranges from 30-50' as a flex development. Our proposed development will be well under the 50' maximum height. This allows for an amenity floor for the residents. 7. Just razing the existing buildings will benefit the community's character and the immediate vicinity. There will not be any on-street parking, all the parking will be contained on site as well as the retention. This immediate section of Island Estates has been in need of redevelopment. With there originally having less than one space per unit, additional parallel parking spaces were placed not even 5' from the sidewalk. Island Estates in itself is a unique community with upscale waterfront lots. All in all, this is a great project for Isl Clearwater as a whole. JUL 11 2005 ORIGINAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT I F CLEARWATER Planning and Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Cle arwater Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 -4567 Fax: 727-5624576 O SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED ANn NcITAR T n APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan v CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials):. ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: i SOUTH: _ 1 WEST. / EAST: / COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revised 9/1912001) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER "D AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 41001) APPLICANT NAME:,?-1t'jA V1-//G ?L c1/ ti/ C Gf R lJ / MAILING ADDRESS- Z-?o? 2 - PHONE NUMBER:, /j - ?, FAX NUMBER e kkl ?i PROPERTY OWNER(S): ? & ?) 2 - (Must (Must Include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) /41 S II ¢S (C MAILING ADDRESS: `-e -11V 1,4111 " 11 -? FAX NUMBER: Wl-PHONE NUMBER: The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Leven Two Approval, as the case may be, If the application for development approval Includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the Information provided on this worksheet: 1. Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. II !1 1 1 2095 RlAiiAit r%r-nAnTAA[!!kIT 0 0 OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. RECEIVED JUL 11 2005 PL"ING DEPARTMENT CITY F CLEARINATER • 4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. ORIGINAL R'"4ECEIVED JUL 11 2005 Please return checklist for review and verification. Date, NING DEPARTMENT CnY OF CLEARWATER (Signature of applicant) S: application formsidevelopment mvlew/comprehensive landscape program application.doc 1? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIRMENTS REVISED EXHIBIT `A' Architectural Theme a. Not Applicable b. We are requesting>a reduction to the landscape buffer from 15' to 0 to the trash staging area along Island Way (south), a reduction on the north side from 10' to 5.8' to a sidewalk and south side from 10' to 5' due to a sidewalk. The site has been designed with a variety of buildings on site as to keep the height of the buildings to a mid-level. In order to accommodate parking spaces, drive isle dimensions and walkways to the right-of-way, landscaping has been reduced. Although we are asking for a reduction to the landscaping, there will be a significant improvement to a site where little or no landscaping exists. The existing site has only 3% open space to where with the new plan, 19% is proposed, as well as a reduction in the impervious space. Although we don't meet the 10' perimeter landscape buffer, it is demonstrably more attractive than what is adjacent to the proposed property where very little buffer is provided between the two properties. 2. Lighting a. No lighting is proposed at this time. When the lighting package is proposed, it will meet all the low-lighting requirements and lights will be on timers. 3. Community Character a. The landscape treatment will enhance the community immensely. The current landscaping on site is at a bare minimum. Most of the property is asphalt and concrete. The only viable landscaping are some palm trees around the pool area. The proposed landscaping will surround the entire property, with hedging, sod and various species of trees. It will be in keeping with Florida and the architectural style of the building. 4. Property Values a. The landscaping proposed for our site will only be beneficial to the surrounding parcels in the immediate vicinity. Where there was no landscaping, we will have lush landscaping which will not only enhance the property, but also the community. Per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, the existing just market value of the subject site is $1,450,000.00. Upon completion of the proposed project the property is estimated to be worth approximately $40,000,000. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan 1 RED a. Not applicable RIAX11V 11 20M JUL ORIGINAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 F CLEARWATE XA_C05 AutoCAD Projects\C5i00 \sicnd Estates Condos)\07-005 Re-S??bmittul\Sitc 07-28-0 WEST R7Gl{TOF WAY LINE _-ORIGINAL ISLAND WA Y JJ y{ al' t+f I 0 m 12' A=150.00' A- 1-31' 55" R=5610. 00' CH_150.00' CB=S 14°42' 18" E INTERCOASTAL WATER WA Y 8 , ?i r1 P?? ORIGINAL 14 n A=150. 00' ^=0131' 55" R=5610. 00' r U, L 11 CH=150.00' CB=S 14042'18" E ?j 2om INTERCOASTAL JUL 2 g WA TER WAY ?an?Naw; a4: _ . J ybl N U3HSS9J I N MI 3DVHVDSID ANOiSI ISLAND WAY GRASS MEDIAN 20' ASPHALT PAVEMENT CH=144.6 CB=N 14-4 144. 65' O1°31' 55 T I---4 .I p p •Y p p ?° I? p p p p .? p p LF WIDE SEA WALL ORIGINAL FLt7COR LAYOUT LEVEL 2 .WEt ,,.„ NOAi*dV QIN bombe Y?ww 9EVM016 Q? D 3 N; lm? a[wYN A-1 • • • • RECEIVED ) 1 101: 1 PLANNING D ME OF CLEARWATER ORIGIN+i TYPICAL FLC70R 1_.AYC7UT LE\/Ml- 3 w?fP M0~0 coftbmoft UlaptPpAbq x?w««Mia.w 4w.a.r .w ?a w w+ ww w NN PfMI8pA6 Am A A A nre.w?+n.w.. A ?s A I Qb z N; w A-2 a....s 0 • E 1# It 1 1 2001 P NG DE ENT CITY OF CLEARWATER li i IGIiV i{L "W w ACS ea f a ? ?„ /kl1 Unit 8 3a'fo.. r, F MTV b Ada «n +?ox 1? Reof WbW ? c ??' IIIl? ro II'?f0'Xi ro J 4- x 1 Unft 8 .?. m go 3,810 4, f, atn 4 x r 1? o• x r i• .1,18 i x , , Ki?hal " wic f u'- x Ig?a uww IM 1 IS-r 1 Unit C LOU & f. Unft c 3,964 9. f. Un- c tW4., f. UM 9 3,964 6. f. F L-O Ca R L-A.YC>U T L- E\/ r-=L. 4 tnvpyw, anwi?Ja . Bf vlfit7flfi Q A.w.eaeu.....r A A is ww Q 0 g wlffl? ate.: A-3 0 0 RECEIVED .1111_. 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL w as I.. M.... , M I EXTEFtlaFt MLEVATIQN -RF-Afq "'•. ?(??y7• W ? ? I ? ? ?/?,?j7,y?7 L i ^e:G' . p ?RMMMIw MM M NOb : 11 ?i i W P 11 .._ . _ _. .. _ ... RRR ' . ? S ?. y,' ? / +? ? ? ?'}' ?iq / ' ? Y?I ? /?} ?i y III ??? yyy ? t • ? U ? t p ? w xs p ? MM?waww*a?s cC1I?MpIOgnGp J k? } lK?CrlMFilCM KI.IRVAT14ON -FFtONT Wm w ArchOW OaIMM4ndw IpoerpentN ,w, wr. aw> ?."="7C649""? PE+ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 iI le I w EL-1 • • E RECEIVED ,1111- 11 Mi PLANNING DEE? NT CV Y OF ORIGINAL ® O W r UL • ? {T^[: (,? { ? gip} F }•? 43 .k W . Q r?F lMX-rMF4IQR ELEVATIC,QN - LEFT OIDEE Z vim EXTEFtiQR ?LEVATIQN -F2ISIIH'1' II¢II?E ---? Arob". App$KYb'_"'""""' a AN 4 a a a a 9NFEi NR EL-2 ?J E RECEIVED JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARIMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 5 r T z ?. •.+I9.. ?.?? I?u7. 7r,3eoruwmraE??Y++?xr ?,`.tt. ; ?-p - - - - ?•?'?? ? 1 now / i k, HI tP, ' i ? ?J? 1 sf 111 III ! , CD EXTERIOR ELEVATION - FRONT G ISLA40 WAY WATERFRONT Ct3NClOMINIUMS? C L. EARWAT - F2. F LO R I CAA r?: %?l SUS ')sl4,)d ?d )OR.O. PC24 ORIGINAL 8354M Parched Earth Cm 7712W Dijon CGI w m m m z m 0 U m m z a N 4) O U 8355D Burnt Copper 04/18/05 13:29 FAX 727898345 a 1x002/003 } 1 ?o {aatloae ?elEiddressed Qarekpe3 INST t 99=006802??' Nacoo, SMWAr.TMA07CIZAlRWATU? DC- J!'IN 9 1,999 5;S6PM AddnAg MV.r *tStro . .;f .? ? "•.CirQ'iaet<.?iot1ia337li• • `b .This losttumam Prieparod by .LAURIE'•BRTEP z ' of.grEWAX 7=o>rS It.tswetss,nvc. a oaxssary ltscideot foybe 15tiftllotemt.df,cooditiom . P I NELLRS COUNTY FLA, '' caotaioed Ina tick kM41oce.6WMs tmaaabased by it. OFF. REC • 8K '10387 ' PG A58 ProPeRY,Appraisers Pitrcei ldi utifieitson {Folio) Nwober(s): 08/29/],5/43326./000/0150 `FILE NO: 98070.054 *• t; WARRANTY DEED. - - li?,? Rk'+wta 'paaor` W •,ri>?' YmsM M0 4 ta?aW Olntl ?e?i.. W.Yiadr a YN r Y mre Mho.. - ThisWarr8niyDtxd.Madcthii 30th dayd. :December'„ A.D.i9 98•,py. WESLEY L. SAUNDERS and NANCY SAUNDERS,, his wife whose,Mftl Bunn ia: married . hereinafter allod the grantor. whose oeu office addrau*ii: to RONALD E, KOZAN . and -KAREN L , KOZAN,. husband and wife - whose post office addno is: 4..' •.C? M a'c L o T Gf?K Wirer oe 1 IILJAic, •-4 Ae .5-;, hereinafter calX d the grantee, . WriNESSM: Thu said gtat>»or, for,.. •in coasidcradott orthe sum orsjo.00:D6ll1rti, and Other valWtbk,eonsw' ra'tiaesi, reagK whereon is hcrebyackswwled1cd, hereby yranu, bargains, se?r, aliens; reini;ea, rekasrs, conveys arA confirms dpw the grantee, all chat oemb) Wid situm in PINELLAS County, Florida, viz:. . Lot 15 and the.Sputh One-halt (S 1/2} -of Lot. 16, -of unit' 2,. ISLRND.-.ESTATES -OF CLEARWATER,' accor&ng to the Plat tihereof, as recorded- in Plat gook:47 .;Pages 1'9*A'?;ind , 0,, 'of ;the Pitbl.ic 1 Records 'of PINESLLAS. County, Florida ALSO KNOWN' AS Lot" Fifteen,' (15}and the "SoCZt'Half, (1?2•} - .(mgaeurlig'fiftY fee,. v:;.. (5.0 'on the siraw I l " ar1d, Measuring `.fr?rty; e' g2}t - ait3.. tyre ty,- .. t?te'hur?tlredths F.pet' . -(48:;, 21'}..'on'Zalarid Wayj:..p Lod _axt"`ee?i .. ('16}.;::Unit :two<`{2?;:, ISLfi1N0: ESTA'I'$ Oi? 'CLEARWATEg; accart?i2?g_.t'o , map.,or pjit thtareof at3: r'ecgx?ied,:in; p:Cat. Bap)s'.4•T gags °19-A and. 20,' Public Records off' PTNEiL*A*?:. Cotizit;?,:• Florida..: SWECt` TO• 'twit,„eertain mortgage.. executed; and by WESLEX' St1iJNDER ..' Nt1NC1t SAT7NDERS; his'•wife;: ` :ih fayoi oL? MAtt:tANC?lE.`70OSTEN; gs ,TriiatEe.' Of the'.-Trust Agreement 'of -Mar ianne`'jooateit: ,: dkited Apti1 ;29th., T981, .' - N recorued 10/1%92 in. O. R.. Book' 8047; Page.. 78?1, :Public Records .oF Piiiellas- •-+.. ~. County, Florida. xr.%,E IVEID.. fi, ty f:l! R-??' - JUL'.11.2005 ,y :•?. .. .__....?. .,- IK1. i'Jn:'l?r lr«.111t/. Y Ul/7I/7/?DE P l?T,B -MY tti? ?,.: r ?•; .?..-- -- ( OF CEEARWAYER., ;tt•ti ?j M-16320 PAD 01-08-1999 L7tOM Ot DED•KOZAM H/M RECORDING i 414,50 CT. t 4 ' DOC STAMP -.: Dpe14 . : 3-• 16,750.00 . TOTAb 0,160.50:- L- " RIGH 'AL CNECK AIIT.TENDEREDi: 48,76!.04 anon/003 • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • STORMWATER REPORT FOR: 405 ISLAND WAY PROJECT RECEIVED .11 IL, 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF LEARWATER ORIGINAL 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATFR, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN ?MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH 'AINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Rae'A. o I, E.447431 ey ,,July 2005 Project No. 0510 i 1 of 1 405 ISLAND WAY DRAINAGE NARRATIVE This site consists of an area of 29465 s.f. We are proposing to remove a 26 unit apartment complex with impervious area of 21,376 s.f. and replace it with 26 attached dwellings with 20,486 s.f. of total impervious area. A covered underground retention vault is proposed to accommodate the required landscaping around the building. This vault will provide the required water quality and discharge the over flow into the bay. Drainage Calculations Water Quality Volume Required: 29465 X3/4X 1112 = 1842 c.f. Total Volume Provided = 1872 c.f. ORIGINAi. RECEIVED JUL 11 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Z:12005 AutoCAD Projects10510 -(Island Estates Condos)ILetters & Correspondence1405 Island Way DRAINAGE NARRATIVE.doc1 of 1 WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE -REC- EIVED JUL 11 2005 PLANNING ®EPARIi11fEN? ISLAND WAY _,w. rn = CB=N 14-4 A-144. 65' 01 3' S5" R=5 1 C El u AE 57.2' - - - te. ti 57.2* 4D; 40' ®_ + w ? ? F 1 L N. N ? F 12' . J e :rte . o 12' f4 _ g - --?-- L.-- J -- __.........._ ,___.. FA a a A=150.00' R=5610.00' CH=150.00' CB=S 14°42'18" E INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY OBSOLETE ISLAND WA Y • OffiDIAN ON CURB 20' ASPHALT PAVEMENT 9 n = CB=N 14-4 A=144. 65' 01°31' 55" R=541 . 00 4'CO14 n ®0990?D , , •A. tr RRQOD ?aQaU S ?` e I1? ® 43F{S 59D I ?1 I -'- - 8 r 39"VD SO A>)O1S I I I I I I I I I WIN I I I I ? I• Y I ' 1'. •;. •1'kEl A. • ii?A?NH7911f to 77- N q8 4 ^+7 RP W fii2sw A=150. 00' ^=01-31'55" R=5610, 00' CH=150.00' CB=S 14042'18" E INTERCOASTAL WATER WA Y OBSOLETE 0 0 Planning Department 100 learwater, Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Clearwater C _ Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 U SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION O SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans O SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ *ORIGINAL CASE #: ..--------------- DATE RECEIVED: ------------------- RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: ------------------ SOUTH: --------------------- WEST: --------------------- EAST: ------------------- * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) MAY 2 6 2005 -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT--- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT D AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) - - - - - . MAILINGADDRESSA-L1-9_-lia- 1 _--/4 PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: - ---------------- PROPERTY OWNER(S): AGENT NAME ff/,.)?Y- n!X,QLl,/'Itl/C?_,l?ff1L?J? ?'?__GrsL/S?ytLI_`!?Cd?Ld/ lL!(r111/-1----- MAILINGADDRESS:l1? C, zK? j 900c/ _ ? ??G1 - 7Z ??Z7 ---- PHONE NUMBER:74 ?-± _49,6o ---------- FAX NUMBER: --------- --_- CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Cody Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (i PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: s 0 __'amu ------ c! 9`ll S ?-?sL` ' ---- -------- ------- --- (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S T/ Q,'L4'L,&_ , _'J (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) jct sue. /r 4-L1n - L `) ,- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): -----? ---??-- /------------------- Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations: e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signat6r4) on page 6) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearw ter 0 S0?rT'? 9 ? ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVI?SLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES -__- NO -jv- (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) a ---`SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) 'a' Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------.-E?.??--?r---- -- -- The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. - - - --- - --- - --------- - ---- ---- - -------- - ---- --- -------------------------------- --?? -- ---------------------------------------- 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. --- ---- --------- - - - -------- --------- --------------- --------- -- _a,?S!__ --- --- -- -- --- 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. - --- - --------- - --- - ---- --------- - -------- - --------- - ------------------- --------------------------------- --- --- -- ------------------------- -------?.(=--? ---- -10 - --------------------------- -------- 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. -----,.? -------??- ------- ----------------------- 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including yisual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ------------------------ ------- --- ------------------------------------------------------- --- -----??_--, ---------------------------------------------- MAY 2 6 2005 Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater OBSOLETE 9 0 ORIGINAL O/fsrovide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. -----------? --dA.?c = ------------------- ------ -------------- 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) -- -------- ------------ -------------------- ---+-----------------------? ------------ ---------- 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. -------------------------------------------------------- -------------- --------- --------- ------ - ---- - --- - --------- - --- - --- - ----- --------- ---- --------------- - -- - --- - -- 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. ---- - --- - ----- --- - --- - ------- 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. -- --------------------------- -------- --- ??4.? - X-Z- ------- ----- ------------- -------- -------- 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. -------------------------------- - ------ ---- -------------- ----- --------- ----- ------------- ----------y'-----??-r ---------- ------------------- --------- - - --- - --- - -------- - --- - --- - -------- - ---- - - 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ----- -- - ------- ------ - ------------- ------------------- -------- -- ------__?_???-1= ------------------------------------- 01 - - - --- - --- - --------- MAY 2 6 2005 r r? Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invo addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with 1 City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with th V manual. _ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. Ur^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL i ' (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable e A knowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 5624750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; JW7,REE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, ?t•? including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; Jlu?LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; RKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall 7'e--?GRADING be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; PLAN, as applicable; )?APRAM (NARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) Qr SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; _ North arrow; _ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; MAY 2 6 2005 Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater rood T 0 0 Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. 0 SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: _ Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; _ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; meable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Imper FI or area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. tREDUC ED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: •1,y One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ___ Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; ___ Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: _ All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _ Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (color rendering if possible); IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. MAY 6 2005 L.- 4 Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater • • o 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. a---BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; J ? DUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806 All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'% X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: \ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) jI Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs nd each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: 1, the nd signed, acknowledge that all representations made in this appli do are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and auth - City representatives to visit and photograph the property des ib in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS rn Land subscribed before,e this ?day of A.D. 20to me and/or by _ 7I?}? js personally known has nrnriun -di .?{-- as of property owner or representative Notary public, My commission expires: s 8` MY COMMISSION # pp i 55Rn2 EXPIRES' (?ctobpr t.,, % im MAY 2 2005 - a? TA FL N?4,y ae Page 6 of 7,Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater 03/30/2005 10:35 7274460 t 2THSIDE ENG SO* PAGE 03/03 CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMMSTRATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100-SOUTH-'MYRTLE AVENUE, 24 FLOOR PHONE (727)•562-4587 FAX (7M 562,4576 Ronald E. Kozan and Karen L. Kozan ftftl df #a property ownea 1. That (t am/we are) the owner(s) and record title hDider(S) of the following described property: 2, That this property constitutes the property for whroh a request for a; 3. f That the underai nod (heslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint es tram"07 agent(s) tp dim& OW PeNjorij-dr ather tNCf?eesry to Palm. 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property, S. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify th regoi is tr a and correct, oo?NTPatrtnr?bts- ???,?_,, the !gr?rd, t omcer duty con caned try Ow *m of je or / • ?`p r ' RV kW an ft dsy 0 ®aigna hftfti been flrei duty 3wore? d ends tt?ert* h0ft9 MY Understands the conterlt? ofth t?r'?at h My CbmmWkm topkft: OFFICIAL SEAL" NOWY Pubk Marilyn , Salzman Notary Public, Star linaiS 8:epYontorn, tom i 5/21/2005 MAY 2 b 2005 rn u. or Lacgppn) 03/30/2005 10:35 727446 NORTHSIDE ENG S PAGE 02/03 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION ORIGINAL This fever wit serve as authorization for H2GblM_M with Nort6ide Eaghuering Se>rvlieea, Inc. to act as an agent for Ronald E. and Karen L. Kozan and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 405 Island Way, Clearwater, Florida lying within Pinel - County S't8te of Florida Ronald E. Kozan nabjU ? Prtoperty Karen L. Kozan S? Print Name of Property tmeer 23 Camelot Drive Address of Property owner (603) 654-2445 Telephones Number Oak Brook, IL 60523-1733 1u?WMtste0p Code Notary Public SEAL" n m"`?'# nois t 005 (Name tarY Typed, Prim) or stamped) MAY 2 ? 2005 03/30/2005 10:35 72744680 NORTHSIDE ENG SVCS PAGE 02/03 ORIGINAL LETTER OF AUHORtZATKN This letter will serve as authorization for Hopp Chou With NaH?ide Engineer* Servieea, Inc. to act as an agent for 1A)e and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the con/ on on the property generally located at ti // - / \ /'7 _ / . lying within County. State of 2?)Iz"IW? Signature of Property mp r ? - owner Print Name of Property Owner Address of Property Owner phone Number WtYfUtaWZip Code state of LL" ( 014-- The fOm"ng it s meet was aoknmWge b&Mm me tha day County of l L.LS ??'?4? L ? ? l ??K ??C O ig telly known to me has produced as iderlINCUORn and who did (did not) take an oath. gnature) - Notary Public i LAURA ALENGEU4APOT Commis # MY CCMMI36556 06 ?C„ o ? 6 dedThruN(vc+{i. Apn.+ rwriters -IG olary Typed, Printed or Stamped} MU 2 13 2005 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential InfiIlProject EXHIBIT `A' ;JF J y ?CS PROJECT: 405 Island Way DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S) To raze a 26-unit multi-residential apartment building and construction a 26-unit attached dwelling unit with on-site retention and landscaping. The site will consist of four buildings; (2) building will be 4 levels over parking, 4 living units each, total 8 living units; one building will consist of 2 levels over parking, two living units, and one building consisting of 4 levels over parking, 4 units per floor, total 16 living units. Front setback from 15-0' (to trash staging area) 15' to 14' to pavement and 29' to the building; a reduction to the side setbacks from 10' to 5' to sidewalk, 10.7' to building and 6.1 to the balcony above; no reduction to the rear setback, 18' to building, 10' to the balcony above, and an increase in height from 35' to 45'-11" to the roof deck in accordance with Table 2-404 "MHDR" Residential Infill Project. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL I. The proposed redevelopment project will be in bulk, scale and harmony with the surrounding area. A proposed similar project going to CDB in June is consistent with the current redevelopment project, across the street is a high-rise, condominium building and all along this corridor is mixed use, residential ranging from mid to high density residential units. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The current 26-unit which was built in 1962. The existing building is mainly taken up by an asphalt driveway leaving no area for landscaping. The only landscaping on the existing parcel is around the rear of the building near the pool area. The proposed development will enhance the area, leaving larger landscaped setbacks and leave a more open view to the water by having multiple buildings on the site instead of one tall building. 3. The proposed development consist of residential dwelling units which are consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. No health or safety issues will arise. 4. The proposed development will not affect traffic. We are consistent with the same number of units that are existing. There will be one entrance and one exit. There will also be a circular drive at the entrance. S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. The redevelopment is a residential facility which is consistent with Island Estates. Immediately to the north of our project is another proposed development of condominium units. 6. The current design will have no adverse affects on adjacent properties. The neighborhood is residential as is our proposed project, by constructing separate lower- rise buildings, we are leaving more open space for visibility through the site to the water. Landscaping will surround the property as well as retention being located on site and no spillage over into other properties or the right-of-way. • L? RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA 1. Minor setbacks are being requested for the current redevelopment project. Level I application requires a front setback of 25', we are 0' to the trash staging area, 14' to pavement, but 29' to the building, the side setbacks are for walkways only, we are holding at 10' to the building and the rear setback is 15' to where we are 18' to the building. 2. The fair market value of abutting properties may very well increase due to the demolition of a building built in 1962 which has no improvements done to the property, minimum landscaping and possibly in poor structural condition. The current fair market value of the property per the Pinellas County Property Appraisers Office is $1,450,000.00. After construction and site improvements, the redeveloped project will have a fair market value of approximately $40,000,000.00 3. The proposed redevelopment is for residential units which are permitted in the MHDR zoning district. 4. The proposed use is attached dwelling units which are compatible with adjacent land uses. The only incompatibility would be a newer, more landscaped and better buffered than a few of the adjacent properties. 5. The development of this particular parcel will upgrade the immediate vicinity. Currently next door another residential project is going to be going before the board. The current site and surround sites, which are all apartment units, were all built in the 20's and have not had proper upkeep. 6. Absolutely. More and more older units are being redevelopment in the community itself. The architectural style will be in character with the neighboring units, although they are all unique in themselves and no one building matches the style of another on the Island. 7. Just razing the existing buildings will benefit the community's character and immediate vicinity. There will not be any on-street parking, all the parking will be contained on site as well as the retention. Open space is being kept with a multitude of building instead of one high rise. All in all, this is a great project for Island Estates and Clearwater as a whole. 7 , 0 0 FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXHIBIT `B' PRDJE'CT: 405 Island Way RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS 1. Minor deviations are being requested on the site. A variance in height from 35' to 45'-11" to the roof deck. The requested front setback is 15' to 0 (to the trash staging area) , to pavement from 25' to 14' and 29' to the building and a side setback on the sides from 10' to 5' for walkway and 10' to the building. The building above on the sides is at a 6.1' setback and the rear balcony above is at 10'. 2. The fair market value of abutting properties will only increase. The current site to be redevelopment is appraised at 1.4 million, after construction and site improvements we are anticipating an appraised value of 40 million. The surrounding sites are currently under purchase and redevelopment as well. 3. The current project is proposed to be 26 attached dwelling units. The immediate area is made up of attached dwelling units. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; the surrounding areas are all multi-residential units, same as proposed. 5. The east side of Island Way Blvd. consists of three or four parcels surrounding the proposed parcel of apartment units building in the 20's. Many are flawed structurally and by just razing the buildings on this proposed site will improve the community, immediate vicinity and Clearwater as a whole. 6. The design of the proposed development was taken in mind as to not ask for a height variance. We are below 50' and kept an open view site with multiple buildings and not one large high rise. 7. Minimum are being requested to the site. The side setback requested is for a walkway, which only runs approximately %Z the length of the property line, our building is 10.2' and a rear setback of 15', we are at 18. The required 25' setback is being requested to be reduced to 0' (to trash staging), 14' to pavement, but our project is 29' to the building. All the parking and retention will be retained on site. • Planning and Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Cle arwater Clearwater, Florida 33756 4567 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4576 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED ANn NnTARRFn APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION Including folded site plan CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): _ ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: / SOUTH: _ / WEST: i EAST: COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revised 9/19/2801) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER A14D AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 41001) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS :/?-3 /a5',, _ 2J?-,rOQ f L 431?el Z- PHONE NUMBER: ? f= '2 FAX NUMBERAJ ?? , ?? 2 PROPERTY OWNER(S): f 4 (Must Include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) ?? ,? (Ei?? ccj3S C' MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the information provided on this worksheet: 1. Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. ..?.. Or. O r N. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. JUN 0 6 2005 tea. ? .;;e? Z.ar .?. -7 G , .. t • • 4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Please return checklist for review and verification. Date.?_ row 01 S: applicatlon formsidevelopment review/comprehensive landscape program applicadon.doc "' I 1 ?L, CD 0 0 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIRMENTS REVISED EXHIBIT `A' Architectural Theme a. Not Applicable b. We are requesting a reduction to the landscape buffer from 15' to 0 to the trash staging area along Island Way (south), a reduction on the north side from 10' to 5.8' to a sidewalk and south side from 10' to 5' due to a sidewalk. The site has been designed with a variety of buildings on site as to keep the height of the buildings to a mid-level. In order to accommodate parking spaces, drive isle dimensions and walkways to the right-of-way, landscaping has been reduced. Although we are asking for a reduction to the landscaping, there will be a significant improvement to a site where little or no landscaping exists. 2. Lighting a. No lighting is proposed at this time. When the lighting package is proposed, it will meet all the low-lighting requirements and lights will be on timers. 3. Community Character a. The landscape treatment will enhance the community immensely. The current landscaping on site is at a bare minimum. Most of the property is asphalt and concrete. The only viable landscaping are some palm trees around the pool area. The proposed landscaping will surround the entire property, with hedging, sod and various species of trees. It will be in keeping with Florida and the architectural style of the building. 4. Property Values a. The landscaping proposed for our site will only be beneficial to the surrounding parcels in the immediate vicinity. Where there was no landscaping, we will have lush landscaping which will not only enhance the property, but also the community. Per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, the existing just market value of the subject site is $1,450,000.00. Upon completion of the proposed project the property is estimated to be worth approximately $40,000,000. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan a. Not applicable JUN 0 6 2005 CD r.1. - `` =1 CB=N 14 A=144. 65' O l -3 1' S5" 42' -5 1 0 ^J ! ?. 1 p O ' s << 57.2' 18' 2 57.2' _ _ _ _ OI I E• 1 ? 1 7 I .AI I I O O I 4 6., - ,s' - 4 i y ? y I ¦ 9 ' 12' I m I I I '? g _ ,2'-- 'T9 i'--------- 1 I b A=150. 00' ^=01-31'55" R=5610.00' CH=150.00' CB=S 14°42'18" E w} r? , .per ? ,?. SO OZ 0 0 Nnr INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY 20' ASPHALT PAVEMENT 0 CONCRETE WALK ISLAND WAY GRASS MEDIAN ORCURB 20'ASM41TPAVEMENT CH=144.6 CB=N 14-42' A=144.65' O1°31'55" -541 I ? I I II I I i I 1. P WIDE SEA WALL A=150. 00' ^=0131' 55" R=5610. 00' CH=150.00' CB=S 14°42'18" E INTERCOASTAL WATER WA Y OBSOLETE 4' CONCRETE WALK I 17VHdSV I CONC. ?y N CONC. GUS SEJ 91"D Aii01S 1 • ORIGINA?._. JUN 06 2005 E 0 31310sso,m, }.4 t7T 5-X' Irr t'.C K4 ss r 0 _ n 0 O ? m ? w ?a) m H k m ry w E Candor c 4 -,? Bretzwray / ?? 8reeztvray ?. 2FIf 7C .'t 4 4 ly x - ------------ - L ... .......... ...... l-A ...... . . . .... - - -------- i h n ?In ? n ? a7 i t1,Y ? WATERFRONT CONDOMINIUMS CLEARWATER. FLORIDA G O ?., o Cf _ cry Q r 3131OS80 `t f i j a1 ? f X - ?I z A I J 1 1 , , f i !I M °. 1 ' I S LAN C? WAY ?' S s WATERFRONT CONDOMINIUMS CLEARWATER, FLORIDAi e ?.1 _, 4. 1o r i ; EE E n c ? n n ?_ i i L " 'Ej .,. j 6 ! j d E -Hl J; i 1 f Y a g v j ISt_ANC? WAY )} `I i (? 8 b WATERFRONT CONDOMINIUMS ! CLEARWATER, FLORIDA I r' i ? 2? 8? 0:1/18/05 13:29 FAIT 727898345• ? 002/003 ;T L " •.: r ! t 5:74: ?O NA ( j ]j ' teac3oss « t IE?ddTwo ? mi ?. rte? iNST .t 99 "0068c2?i' ?` r NUw; ?ffrgwA*T rr:;E or r?:ZA"ATvk eiac.. J!'IN 0 ! 888 S ; 0BP11 "''", ;? ' Addreks:}j>M`.Gsirt:9tt+1t:. ' -.? ' • ? ... •''.a?'?"e;'; „'? :: >? ' ?• Cisss?iata•, tilslia°3J7l? • : .. ? .. ?, r;.' ,;r?, .v: tins LtSIrWai n PjjVWW by; •LAUI?I$ `•BRISF "f a Of, ffMWARTT= OF ?I=Y?ATZ& INC.' u 1 oa:e=0 °idem bitse Ainbtomt.d[eoedWoes . P 1 NELLAS COUNTY FLf1, ' ;.. .w Ined ln'ti tleie iaaeitiaeo.ioamiiematt istird Dy $. OFF.R£C . BK "10387 ' PQ 456 S' ° e ' Property 7\ tllsera Psrret ldeoriflc j'I (Po11o271umber{cj: - RtY 08/2*97is/43326./ObOJ0150 FILE NO:- 98070'054 WARRANIrV DEED. 's'? ... m.+w'paaor•W• M.rarurew,itnimr?a' '. ,N. . Pte' pin.at tYrOtra atN • ei mr,a {WCr.t it%?'???97t! This WAh*nfy lkai:Made fiti 30th ; day of, December'.. A.D. 19 98 ; 4Y WESLEY L: -SAUNDERS and NANCY SAUNDERS:, his wife whose-nu a1 wtu is mer>r ed. MAY 2 .2005 r he'reimfty called the motor, whose oom offma addres i ii: to•RONALD E.,, k6ZAN .'and. •KAREN V, , KOZAN,, husband ana,vif e ' whose post office address Is: /.• L'A M-9 t.o r,.. •iF/1? r k . Sri AJO, •e; : 6d Sz _•? . -• hereuulbe? calyod 1be gtatitee, .. .. ? .. - . WrIMSSETH: Thu sw sm' w, far grA in c6dWer111011 ofthe.mm 6t110.00:DaU1ri,'and other ratupble:comWrat",- • ttoclpS wheeeei( is hereby:eknowlediod, hereby Yrauts; barflbts, sells, 11im, m6ilm, mka,Set, eoervays M d eonftrias 4w the grantee, all thatestmit} tirid"sisiuk la PINELLAS Caucty,•Flafids, viz:' Lot- 1k and the •E1put) One-half (S 1/2) ,of'.Lot. '15,:-of trift` 2.; ISLAMY•1STNTE0 -OF CLEARWATER,' aclrbrding to the' Plot ' Chereof ; as redorded- i.n .Mat Soak'.; 7 ":Pages 19TA-Yand 20,. 'df -the Puublic R,4cords 'of PI1?ELLAS•Count -', y, ' Floriria . _ r:?• ' ALSO.XNTOWN AS :.. , - i:•,' v;'r?'" ?L' •=t' ,t'„ 'Lot'• Pift'adjj, (15?, and' the sou:t}> i?t f "(.1/2,}:• •(iii sa>auriiig fiftp -feet' - ('30" %bn tie s awell;'tiiid'. t?eateur ri {:fr3rt? ' g2} and'..*tllenty,- t rte'hurrdthq,.•foat-;446:'. 22'`}..;bn IaLauai? `{2?:. I$Z?AND:;T6? '. B8 !'k4' 0 CLmWAtEEtt map.or •pla't Cliereof as'.reCoxaed,;jn; 1?:1at. 8gpk Pa a g 37; 5 :'7.19:-A and. ;', 2'0, Pulalic Records 'o#' ..PNELL14Ba:'Count y;;• F1Qrid;.; '-' •S17B.7ECT'?TO• ?t eerCa - • ? :'.?-•?. "° '..• :_?:•:.' ' -,, ?, iTt moll tgage , exi•ctiCed' 'by WIYSYE?' ?,.' ;SAtiEtlnERtS ,and xocC SAMEM, E??.s''vffe;. 'favo'r, oic MAR.I?tNNE.`a00S1`F?t,' g9',TYustee :: of the. Trust Agreement' -a-f'Marianne`'Jodsten,: d•?ted April .29th. , 181, ?; .: ;..''•'' recorded:1 /1/92 in.O;R..Hook'8047,•Page:78(?, Public':Records.o. PNellas'.,,- ' County, Florida. [I A i)S',L?Kv. G+t,aptal?r Ttix rd• F. (p, hlRiti. ttft. Plt,.•'t?• G :atty. n IA ;ti V. - \1 EG11b320" PAD 01-0E1-109 .17117;33. '?`,' ; Ot 'DED?KUAH H/Y ??• AECORDIHG - i ' .110,50 . ...,` DOC STAMP -. U t9 3 ' 16, 750.00 TOTALI- %-760. Sop CHECK AMT.TEKD RED"r; 40;760.50 L. •-1.00. . 04/181/05 13:30 FAX 7278983458 0RI, ti RS' COUFISY fi p'IHtl.4 Ip361 "po is L Us propw(01 RtYJ? dr posaeawad otttie,t7nmr(a).. TOGE l Iii?tt v o aft ?enemsan?. hart diomtp?Lt•auad apRurepmca u>keiom bok+,ytn j o, bt Yayaiss appemtak's. ' To Have' ai+d, tn1lMd,,tbn 146 m fpa ek5ple tower.. -:...' ' . • . •• ;' , ..„ . , <• -. to ARd •8u•?ru?tor hireby tovewott rkb raid limit dsa4't6e ttiaaor,4:L+tllilYy tpus!-of slid iiaq ?O ta;aimpks:-.diat,tfie `racitor . hu tood'ri& aid Lv+A?I n6wi y :mull aad tadveY said'Math ,dtaa ihe'Ttaator lKn by. tiillY.?r+r die ti jt,. saki Und. and wUi deforA dw sacra ayw (be kwf, ! berms of'a9 pens= awbomsoevcr; ' and'lbetAW btMd is ftte of to ana4obeaaea,. •siccept uxp ?i ??rn?ina c:hwnu?nt rn a'f?rr.nKer 17 l 0 98 'rwteevuima .?e4?innt ?nii aa.MV,u+t n?w.,:..I It ..w IN W PiFS8 WHERFAF't Grantor has' bereumo set. ttutor's hurt sad scat nee day tad yeu first ibovs wHsea: ' ..' 9ltned. Sa etas .Our .,. _ , . ,.. 1??iesi tirssatri; .. ,• • :•t;%? 1801).; ? ?. wwwu pejad W :: LLBY .?, taA $ Witnu S4nasun: 4 ?1r rG'1c (fir . Willie" Now x 'RONAL5 E, 90MERS ?'1QNbERS.:. ? Wkwo W? ftnoulti • • • P!'saecr Sijtiidus:•• . ' , . •''+ - y.. • t? ? • WbaeuAioaed NAM: srA'fZ 010 FLQ$IDA COVNTY OF PXNELLA9 ne ?gtoiu 4+in=icti w,s:ttnOwiedlod befora•inne this ? 34th .ddy pt ; Deeemhex ' 14; 98 ' by WESLEY' L. •SAUDiD00 and NARCY•'SAUNDERS,' hits: wif(i I ggpq X iwbo ksatluve prodttead dri'verakena ) /r Milg t{dc - z.- 1My eommisebn e,ipirea;" OFFICIAL NOrl1(iN'8EAL 5 ??* y ;Ronald E: 8 n ` . Prinkd :f " ; P ' . CQ?utMISSIQN N(tMSEfS: -}lorry Pjb13a R`?'!zr!4!! ?. $O?ERS , eyr C ' - . a',?' • .• G?.7?74= t.• -;i SetfalNtlmber,'t' .. ?ti. , • : r•? .,y• •. ?t.?:.?: .`:: ' NOV.EM49R7-2cb9.;; 'r+ ?' `.•aM1 :., T. fbrt3o?nYietsbiunenl wss tttnbw(edjed before o?e'thii diY:of t9 who vMre'perwrully hwwn io rw bt *ho wtILvd,*mduud' driver liccnao(a? u' ide ntftin'tkrit, ' 'my Comm(ss108, ti,p4a, ' Pilowd Niuiks ; .. .. Notary ?utiik • . • .. ; ' ' past 2-or 2 0003/nn3 CIVIL • LANG PLANNINC • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION ORIGINAL STORMWATER REPORT FOR : 405 ISLAND WAY PROJECT r Ram A. Gib, . 94 t1 yy? {` ? w 9?I T S ? ? t???[1A?17t?t May 2005 Project No. 0510 OBSOLETE 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA .337SS ??? ? N ESADMI NC?MI N DS PRI NG.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRINC.COM 727 - 443 - 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 1 of 1 ORIGINAL 405 ISLAND WAY DRAINAGE NARRATIVE This site consists of an area of 29465 s.f. We are proposing to remove a 26 unit apartment complex with impervious area of 28667 s.f. and replace with 26 attached dwellings with 23749 s.f. of total impervious area. A covered retention vault is proposed to accommodate landscaping around the building. This vault will provide the required water quality and discharge the over flow into the bay. Drainage Calculations Water Quality Volume Required: 29465 X 3/ X 1/12 = 1841 c.f. Total Volume Provided = 1872 c.f. MAY 2 63 2005 X T005 AutoCAD Projects10510 - (Island Estates Condos)1Letters & Correspondence1405 Island Way DRAINAGE NARRATIVE.doc1 of i L' 0 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project ORIGINAL EXHIBIT `A' P,WfECT: 405 Island Way DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S) To raze a 26-unit multi-residential apartment building and construction a 26-unit attached dwelling unit with on-site retention and landscaping. The site will consist of four buildings; (2) building will be 4 levels over parking, 4 living units each, total 8 living units; one building will consist of 2 levels over parking, two living units, and one building consisting of 4 levels over parking, 4 units per floor, total 16 living units. Front setback from 10-25' to 14' to pavement and 29' to the building; a reduction to the side setbacks from 10' to 5' to walkway and 10.2' to building and no reduction to the rear setback, 18' to building in accordance with Table 2-404 "MI-1DR" Residential Infill Project. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL 1. The proposed redevelopment project will be in bulk, scale and harmony with the surrounding area. A proposed similar project going to CDI3 in June is consistent with the current redevelopment project, across the street is a high-rise condominium building and all along this corridor is mixed use, residential ranging from mid to high density residential units. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The current 26-unit which was built in 1962. The existing building is mainly taken up by an asphalt driveway leaving no area for landscaping. The only landscaping on the existing parcel is around the rear of the building near the pool area. The proposed development will enhance the area, leaving larger landscaped setbacks and leave a more open view to the water by having multiple buildings on the site instead of one tall building. 3. The proposed development consist of residential dwelling units which are consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. No health or safety issues will arise. 4. The proposed development will not affect traffic. We are consistent with the same number of units that are existing. There will be one entrance and one exit. There will also be a circular drive at the entrance. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. The redevelopment is a residential facility which is consistent with Island Estates. Immediately to the north of our project is another proposed development of condominium units. 6. The current design will have no adverse affects on adjacent properties. The neighborhood is residential as is our proposed project, by constructing separate lower- rise buildings, we are leaving more open space for visibility through the site to the water. Landscaping will surround the property as well as retention being located on site and no spillage over into other properties or the right-of-way. OBSOLETE MAY 2 ' 2005 0 ? ORIGINAL RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA 1. Minor setbacks are being requested for the current redevelopment project. Level I application requires a front setback of 25', we are 14' to pavement, but 29' to the building, the side setbacks are for walkways only, we are holding at 10' to the building and the rear setback is 15' to where we are 18' to the building. 2. The fair market value of abutting properties may very well increase due to the demolition of a building built in 1962 which has no improvements done to the property, minimum landscaping and possibly in poor structural condition. The current fair market value of the property per the Pinellas County Property Appraisers Office is $1,450,000.00. After construction and site improvements, the redeveloped project will have a fair market value of approximately $40,000,000.00 3. The proposed redevelopment is for residential units which are permitted in the MHDR zoning district. 4. The proposed use is attached dwelling units which are compatible with adjacent land uses. The only incompatibility would be a newer, more landscaped and better buffered than a few of the adjacent properties. 5. The development of this particular parcel will upgrade the immediate vicinity. Currently next door another residential project is going to be going before the board. The current site and surround sites, which are all apartment units, were all built in the 20's and have not had proper upkeep. 6. Absolutely. More and more older units are being redevelopment in the community itself. The architectural style will be in character with the neighboring units, although they are all unique in themselves and no one building matches the style of another on the Island. 7. Just razing the existing buildings will benefit the community's character and immediate vicinity. There will not be any on-street parking, all the parking will be contained on site as well as the retention. Open space is being kept with a multitude of building instead of one high rise. All in all, this is a great project for Island Estates and Clearwater as a whole. yr, K,'( 2 i 70,05 rV t_,a• 4..vt i? ? 0 0 ORIGINAL FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXHIBIT `B' PROTECT: 405 Island Way RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS 1. Minor deviations are being requested on the site. We are not requesting a variance in height or minimum rear setbacks. The requested front setback is to pavement from 25' to 14' and 29' to the building and a side setback on the sides from 10' to 5' for walkway and 10' to the building. 2. The fair market value of abutting properties will only increase. The current site to be redevelopment is appraised at 1.4 million, after construction and site improvements we are anticipating an appraised value of 40 million. The surrounding sites are currently under purchase and redevelopment as well. 3. The current project is proposed to be 26 attached dwelling units. The immediate area is made up of attached dwelling units. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; the surrounding areas are all multi-residential units, same as proposed. 5. The east side of Island Way Blvd. consists of three or four parcels surrounding the proposed parcel of apartment units building in the 20's. Many are flawed structurally and by just razing the buildings on this proposed site will improve the community, immediate vicinity and Clearwater as a whole. 6. The design of the proposed development was taken in mind as to not ask for a height variance. We are below 50' and kept an open view site with multiple buildings and not one large high rise. 7. Minimum are being requested to the site. The side setback requested is for a walkway, which only runs approximately %2 the length of the property line, our building is 10.2' and a rear setback of 15', we are at 18. The required 25' setback is being requested to be reduced to 14' to pavement, but our project is 29' to the building. All the parking and retention will be retained on site. OBSOU:=Wwrw L J Planning and Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Cle arwater Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 -4567 Fax: 727-562-4576 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan 11 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: _ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): _ ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: / SOUTH: - / _ WEST: / EAST: - i COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIRE QAtPINAL (Revised 9/19/2001) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER D AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 41001) \ C/ APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS:/ ? ,40 % /) JC 426 L ? ? ??/ Z PHONE NUMBER: A "IA 3 - ? FAX NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER(S): / ` ? 'l r? (Must Include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) c f , - `/ MAILING ADDRESS: ?F ?/ /?C G L} G 1 N?" ` / c? f ??, C ?/` .?9? L?_/2 /?i J' /S a PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval Includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the information provided on this worksheet: 1. Architectural Theme. MAY 2 6 2005 a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OBSOLETE • Si OR 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. a MAY 2 6 2005 CD?SOLETE b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. • 4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. MAY 2 6 2005 Please return checklist for review and verification. t Dat -A _ S: application forms/development review/comprehensive landscape program application.doc - COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIRMENTS EXHIBIT `A' 1. Architectural Theme 0 "" I G I INA L a. Not Applicable b. Being on a waterfront lot, the landscaping must be tolerant to the salt water and draught. The only portion of landscaping under the minimum requirements is two portion on the sides due to having to run a 4' walkway on both sides. All other landscaping is per code. 2. Lighting a. No lighting is proposed at this time. When the lighting package is proposed, it will meet all the low-lighting requirements and lights will be on timers. 3. Community Character a. The landscape treatment will enhance the community immensely. The current landscaping on site is at a bare minimum. Most of the property is asphalt and concrete. The only viable landscaping are some palm trees around the pool area. The proposed landscaping will surround the entire property, with hedging, sod and various species of trees. It will be in keeping with Florida and the architectural style of the building. 4. Property Values a. The landscaping proposed for our site will only be beneficial to the surrounding parcels in the immediate vicinity. Where there was no landscaping, we will have lush landscaping which will not only enhance the property, but also the community. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan a. Not applicable MAY 2 6 2005 03SOLETE i ? ORIGINAL ISLAND WAY 8 CB=N 14-42' A=144.65 01°3155" -5 I 0 ".. v, ,9t ? i / ? I .E O f __ _ (3 tom. 47. _- ' 1 1e 14 I O ¦ I 1 4 1 1 ¦ ' I ? -- ----*-- i i it, o. I O ? 1 I fA R A=150.00' A=01-31'55" R=5610.00- CH=150. 00' CB=S 14°42'18" F oB- 6u LFETE INTERCOASTAL WATER WAY 20 ASPHALT PAVEMENT ISLAND WA Y GRASS MEDIAN 0.6'CURB 20'ASPHALTPAVEMENT 31.1,l m I. ' CURB 4' CONCRETE WALK 4' CONCRETE WALK a -1 n -144. CB=N 1442' A=144.65' 01°31'55" 4' CONCRETE WALK a o° LTVHasv C - _ ? ? ? ,? , G9}IS S8J ' a Q Axoysi I CONC. C n ? y ? CONC !7 ? % rlff ?. 8 g R I.I' WIDE SEA WALL A= 150. 00' A=01-31'55" R=5610.001 - CH=150.00' CB=S 14°42'18" E Ot"MOLETE KAY 2 6 2()05 INTERCOASTAL WATER WA Y ------------------ ---------------- N ?,l S tai ?.. a+v .J) fiW w r4r tLew 9eboan +90*r ? oj" le 1 . xf1 troo,n fes x x 2 ?? % Unk C Unt 8 IM4& f. ix?Os t. w 00 F w l t7-0'X q4' z t per tg'U^X@'r F F 'X 3 x waw -x7M e. X Q? C Unit C L04 a t ?. z an Opan TeBobw W, fd'$'X 11'S ( + ., z Ss*ocm 11'1 " 1q % 4' F?eexh R t $'X1' Unit A ?I BW. W?y,? 5...?^' L09D L f, a31 y F- f PLA % N El X R, q x r ?y ? Tfi?i oam 1 '. X i d . ,.. ?S g8 Unit c L954 & t WI. . 11'?f0'X 129' fg' °X '?a' 1 '.g'X t3 0- KW- Unit B .?. ,r?k"15r F??i 1 t+, AUfB?? 3.910 a f. rt ` ?tv ? C'X8• Unit C . 23 Wh w L954 f. 8mlr a !?Ift ts-e'x,rr ?t?n f tt- , 111 '• KYcMn r L W., TY PICAL FLO©FR LAYOUT w aoe+rast p,owporeew a?a CWNNGM a 6 a a a a a a a ?s 0 3 A-1 E F OT ___T m O 1 _ aa? EXTERIOR ELEVATION -REAR IA C e LIP JOR6 EXTERIOR ELEVATION -FRONT S $ A z D r Archhecta' Collaborative Incorporated :ua++aA. we. cavmgxr 6 n aensrows D D Q j ? z J 8? LL Z ?U F Z QL NQ J . ? U .?.s~as-oa sin r+a EL-1 AmhhoeW c.wrernav. tneorporwe N pu?ftNtM )tltu)tW1M CpMDM RflA90N§ 0 Z g? N< _3 EL-2 0 0 ORIGINAL FLD2005-05045 405 ISLAND WAY Date Received: 05/26/2005 HARBORSIDE MAY 2 6 2005 ZONING DISTRICT: IEOD LAND ESE: RH ATLAS PAGE: 267B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED L CLWCoverSheet O,,, Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Lopez, Michael Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 11:57 AM To: Wells, Wayne; 'Doreen Williams' Cc: Thompson, Neil; Garriott, Kevin Subject: RE: BCP2007-02247, 405 Island Way The last activity on this permit was on 5/22/07. Five months from that date (10/22/07) a 5 month letter will go out asking for the status of this project. If we receive no response from this letter 30 days after the date of the letter, the permit will be voided. Should you respond within those 30 days,the time frame we will extend the review process for is up to the Building Official. Hope this helps explain the process. If you have any questions I can be reached at 727/562-4567 X 2569. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 8:32 AM To: 'Doreen Williams; Lopez, Michael Cc: Thompson, Neil Subject: BCP2007-02247, 405 Island Way Doreen - Since this is a building permit issue, it is appropriate for Development Services (Michael Lopez) to respond to your question. The FLD approval is now vested but is now dependent upon what happens with the building permit. Please be aware that if the building permit is voided due to inactivity, then the FLD approval will become void. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 8:20 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: BCP2007-02247 Good morning, Currently, we have comments from staff regarding the above case. Since the market is still so upside down, we are trying to extend this permit out as long as we can without it being cancelled. Will the City send us a notice prior to cancelling the permit for us to either resolve comments and move forward or just cancel it when they see no activity on it? Sincerely, Doreen A. Williams Project Director 10/11/2007 #. 1 0 0 Page 2 of 2 NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 300 S. Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33765 Phone: 727-443-2869 x104 Fax: 727-446-8036 Cell: 727-235-8474 10/11/2007 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 6:01 PM To: 'Doreen Williams' Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: 405 Island Way Doreen - Section 4-407 is very specific in the time frames in which to vest a project by submitting for a building permit or by asking for and receiving a time extension. The Time Extension Development Order dated August 16, 2006, granting a time extension to February 16, 2007, contained specific language as to any future time extension by the Community Development Board (CDB). Since the Time Extension Development Order expires on February 16, 2007, and the next available CDB meeting is February 20, 2007, the Code does not provide any alternatives other than it expiring. The only apparent alternative at this time is for your client to submit for building permits to construct the improvements approved under the FLD case. However, by submitting application(s) for building permits, your client must diligently pursue obtaining the building permits and then actually constructing the improvements. Should the building permit be voided due to inactivity or no work being performed, the original FLD approval will then become void. Sorry I can't give you better news, but I am bound by the time frames set out in the Code. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:DWilliams@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 4:27 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 405 Island Way Wayne, HELP!!!!! M! Our developer just realized the our Development Order extension expires on February 16, 2007. 1 need to ask the Board for a one year extension. Here is my dilema. The next CDB hearing is February 20th - after our deadline date. Now what do I do? Doreen No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.4 10 / Virus Database: 268.17.15/659 - Release Date: 1/30/2007 1/30/2007 0 0 CITY OF C LEARWAT E R I'I.ANNING DEPARTMENT Pos'r Oi i:iue Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 Sourn MvR,i,u: AVliNui:, CLHARWAI ER, FLORIDA 33756 THILP:PHONi? (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LON(; RANGE PIANNING August 16, 2006 Di.-VELOPiV EM, Rimiiw Ms. Doreen Williams Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Williams: On August 16, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (26 existing and proposed attached dwelling units; 20 dwelling units maximum under land use category), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 26 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 feet to 144.65 feet, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 6.1 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 6.1 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to 46 feet (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of six feet (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-404.F, and reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (August 16, 2006). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On July 25, 2006, you submitted a request for a six-month time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited an issue of coordination of development approvals, where a latter development approval to add a pool for this project was approved by the CDB on November 15, 2005 (FLD2005-08086). This apparently caused confusion with development time frames with the architect as to when a building permit must be submitted for the project. FP \\K I111MWI).MM)1t Iiu L J? mu,s, Cnr.?? n w:>n;I N ® C va i ? A. h [I I",., C()I M 11 Nieynirr 'T()I m FmI'l o) firm vxl) i\[:I WVA Il : A( rIOV I?,UPL()1 PR" August 16, 2006 Williams - Page Two C Since the approval of this project, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: The requirement for parking has been amended to two parking spaces per unit. This project was approved with 43 parking spaces for 26 attached dwelling units, at a parking ratio of 1.65 parking spaces per dwelling unit. The requirement for parapet height for buildings with flat roofs has been amended to a maximum of 42-inches. This project was approved with a parapet height of six feet (from roof deck). In considering the above changes to the Code and Beach by Design, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension to February 16, 2007, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 405 Island Way. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Micha'el/Del'k/AI Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationsUsland Way 405 Harborside (MHDR) #1 - ApprovedVsland Way 405 Time Ext. Dev. Order 8.16.06doc Horthside July 24, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-05045 405 Island Way Blvd. Dear Mr. Delk: CIVIL* LAND PLANNINC• ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • RECEIVED JUL 2 5 2606 PtAW" DEPARTMENT M OF MEAMM The above case was issued a Development Order on August 16, 2005 and will be expiring on August 16, 2006. On November 15, 2006, we were issued a Development Order FLD2005-08086 for an addition of a swimming pool. This will expire on November 15, 2006. We did not realize that both cases would be falling under separate Development Orders at different times; we assumed they would be combined to the latter date of November, 2006. The architect being under the assumption that we did not have to file for a building permit until November will not be complete with building plans. We formally request a six month extension to February 16, 2007. Your favorable response is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Doreen A. Williams Project Director 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN(a?MINDSPRINC.COM NESTECH-i MINDSPRINC.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Page 1 of 1 0 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 5:30 PM To: 'Doreen Williams' Subject: RE: 405 Island Way Doreen - I apologize for not communicating the answer to your question earlier. The Development Orders are separate. The attached dwellings FLD will expire on August 16, 2006, while the pool FLD will expire on November 15, 2006. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:Doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 8:06 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 405 Island Way Wayne, what did you find out for me regarding the development order. Does the building and the pool fall under the latter D.O. or are they separate? I just need to see if I need to file an extension. Thanks Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727-443-2869 / Fax: 446-8036 / Cell: 235-8474 Email: doreen northsideengineering.com No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/373 - Release Date: 6/22/2006 6/29/2006 C ITS OF C LEARATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 22, 2005 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way Dear Mr. Ghovaee: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On August 16, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (26 existing and proposed attached dwelling units; 20 dwelling units maximum under land use category), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 26 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 feet to 144.65 feet, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 6.1 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 6.1 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to 46 feet (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of six feet (from roof deck), as a Residential InEll Project, under the provisions of Section 2-404.17, and reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-404.F. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILLJONSON, VICE-MAYOR .1otiN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER Hovr HXMIL ON, COUNCII.MEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCII' EMBER "FQUAI, EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE. ACTION FMPLOYFR" 0 0 August 22, 2005 Ghovaee - Page 2 3. That the windows and sliding glass doors on the front elevation be coordinated with that indicated on the floor plans prior to the issuance of the building permit; 4. That the site and landscape plans be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to show a four-foot high, landscaped opaque fence or wall along the west, north and south property lines to screen off- street parking from the adjacent parcels and roadway; 5. That boats moored at the existing or future dock, lifts and/or slips be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; 6. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign be a monument- style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; 7. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 8. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed underground; 9. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 10. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 11. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits, including any extension of the fire riser to the north for the future docks. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (August 16, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 30, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). 0 0 August 22, 2005 Ghovaee - Page 3 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner 111, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/plannin g. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael e CP Planning Director S: (Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicationsVsland Way 405 Harborside (MHDR) - ApprovedVsland Way 405 Development Order. doc i CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • August 9, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-05045 405 Island Way Dear Mr. Wells: It has come to my attention that the civil plans do not show access to the existing docks. At the current time we have two hatched spaces for "no parking". We will extend this pavement to the end of property line for dock accessibility. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, 14,11.- ?Ao i)oreen A. Williams Project Director 6071 CLEVEL ND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEAR?-;'? fit, FLORIDA 33755 NESADM ? NDSPRIN6.COM NESTECH MNDSPRINC.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 1'11D 2 2005 PLANNING, & CEVELOPMENT SERVICES (, c FARWA--, Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 4:48 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: Staff Reports for 8.16.05 CDB Doreen - Attached are the Staff Reports for 415 Island Way, 405 Island Way and 445 Hamden Drive. Wayne 7_J 7_J 7_J Island Way 415 Island Way 405 Hamden 445 Staff Report fo... Staff Report.do... dockside II Staff R.. 08/09/2005 16:35 727446QikQR Norihsliffie August 9, 2005 Mr_ Wayne Wells Planner 111 City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FI.D2005-05045 405 Island Way Dear Mr. Wells: NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 02/02 CIVIL 0 LAND PLANNING 0 ENVIRONMEN'T'AL. TR,AN5PORTATION 0 It has come to my attention that the civil plans do not show access to the existing docks. At the current time we. have two hatched spaces for "no parking". We will extend this pavement to the end of property line for dock accessibility. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, teen A. Williams Project Director 601 CL£VEI.AND 5TREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NE5AOMIN(@MIND5PRIN6.C©M N E5TEGH@M1 ND5PR1 NG.COM 727 • 443 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 08/09/2005 16:35 7274468JI&E NORTNSIDE ENG NOnRSme s 1"d FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL Date: To: PAGE 01/02 CIVIL • LANG PLANNING • F.NVIRONAAENTAL • TRAWPORTATION • Time: '&-- Page 1 of Fax No?% Of From: Doreen A. Williams, Project Director Doreenrt?taorthsideengineering.com Project Name< AJ NES Project No.: COMIV ENTS: comments regarding this project. 601 CLEVELAND MEET, SUITE 930 CLEARWtATFR, FLOP-IDA 33755 NESADt,AIN@MIND5PRING.ChM N ESTECN@MI N P5PRI NG.C0fA 727 • 443 - 2869 FAX 717 • 446 • 8036 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: Elk To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: 405 Island Way NES Proj# 010 We Transmit: X_ Enclosed Under Separate Cover Mail UPS Overnight Pick-Up X Hand Delivered ORIGINAL X Originals X Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 15 Civil & Landscape Drawings (7 sheets), I signed and sealed 15 8.5" X I I" Civil Site Plan 15 8.5" X 11" Colored Landscape Plan Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies to: FILE BY N. Pelzer D ?en A. Wi liams, Project Director A. Haines 'a'w? -a"' a/,? t,6 1 oFJUL 2 9 2005 j 601 CLEVELAND STREP SUiI E 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN(L-OMINDSPRINC.COM NESTECH@,MINDSPRING.COM 727 - 443 • 2869 FAX 727 - 446 • 8036 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Doreen Williams [doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 4:57 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: 405 Island Way Scott - attached are our responses to the above job. I must have been sleeping when I was typing due to the face I missed answering responses to traffic. Let me know. Thanks Doreen Doreen A. Williams Project Director Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727-443-2869 / Fax: 446-80361 Cell: 235-8474 Email: doreen northsideengineering.com 7/20/2005 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 10:34 AM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FW: FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way FYI - ASAP -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 9:35 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Faessler, Heather Subject: FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way Wayne, Several issues on the above case were not resolved in the resubmittal: Traffic 1. Vertical clearance height for drop off area must be a minimum of 114 inches. 7/12/05 - NO RESPONSE 2. Design shear wall at parking spaces to allow sight visibility for motorists backing out. 7/12/05 - NO RESPONSE 5. Columns must not encroach in the parking stalls i.e. columns that are located behind wheel stops may be hit. 7/12/05 - NO RESPONSE Environmental 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 7/12/05 - NOT MET - JUSTIFICATION ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES SIDES OF PROPERTY, HOWEVER THE REAR APPEARS TO POSSESS SUFFICIENT SPACE TO ACCOMODATE ACCESS TO DOCKS AND STORMWATER TREATMENT. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. 7/12/05 - NO RESPONSE 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. 7/12/05 - NOT MET - VAULT MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE NOT INCLUDED WITH RESUBMITTAL. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyC/earwater.com • June 6, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way DRC Responses Dear Mr. Wells: C] Listed below are our responses to the June 30, 2005 Development Review Comments. General Eniineering 1. Prior to building permit, a separate right-of-way permit will be obtained. 2. Applicant responsible for all associated fees and other installation fees for the City of Clearwater's installation of water tap, water meters and back flow preventor. 3. Condominium plat will be recorded prior to issuance of C.O. Environmental 1. The underground vault was designed due to the fact that there is no room on the sides of the property for retention. Due to the fact that stairs exit on both sides of the property, a sidewalk needed to be in place for residents to be able to have access to the right of way. The rear of the property, which is waterside also prevents us from a pond since docks will be installed and pedestrian access must be obtained. In order for retention to run on the rear of the property (along the seawall), it will have to be vertically walled and enclosed with a 6' chain linked fence. There is not enough room to accomplish this. 2. An oil and grease trap separator or comparable treatment system to capture auto pollutants will be provided. 3. Details and cross-section of vault attached. 4. See attached vault maintenance schedule. Fire 1. It is acknowledged that fire has not approved or reviewed any construction plans or documents other than site work. 2. Underground water mains and hydrants to be installed completely, tested and in service prior to construction. Mr. Wayne Wells June 6, 2005 Page Two 3. A 7 %' front and side clearance and a 4' rear clearance has been provided around hydrant. 4. A 7 %' front, side and rear clearance has been provided for FDC maintenance. Landscaping 1. See Comprehensive Landscape Program. 2. Vehicular use area has been reduced (See site table). Curbing has been installed on interior islands where interior islands are provided. 95% of the vehicular area is located under the building. 3. Parking lot interior landscaping has been crosshatched. 4. See Sheet L1.1 for revised front buffer. 5. Fire line has been relocated to be closer to the building. 6. See revised narrative on Comprehensive Landscape Program. Parks and Recreation No issues Solid Waste 1. Recycling will be staged in the trash shoot area in the building. The project has proposed a 10x10 dumpster pad along Island Way Blvd. Recycling will be rolled out on different days than the dumpster. 2. See architectural drawings regarding shear wall 3. See Sheet C3.1 for one-way and do not enter signage. 4. See Sheet C3.1 showing white pavement directional arrows. 5. See Sheet C3.1 for revised column and parking layout. 6. H/C Stall has been provided and sign details will comply with City standards. Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O. Traffic Engineering 1. Drop off area has been eliminated. Balcony on 2„ d floor has a clearance of over 114" 2. Shear walls have been relocated as to not obscure sight visibility. 3. See Sheet C2.1 for one-way and do not enter signage. 4. White pavement directional arrows have been indicated on Sheet C2.1. 5. See Sheet C2.1 for column revisions. Planning 1. Lot acreage on Sheet C 1.1 has been revised to read 0.676 acres. 2. See Sheet C3.1 for revised stairs and architectural plan. 3. Building dimensions are shown on Sheet C2.1. 4. Existing docks are to remain and sidewalk access has been provided. See Sheet C3.1. 5. Unity of Title to be recorded prior to building permit. i i Mr. Wayne Wells June 7, 2005 Page Three 6. Sheets EL-1 and EL-1 indicate areas to receive specific colors per color selection chart. 7. Sheet A-3 has been revised to indicate proper floor level. Top floor level layout has been provided. 8. No pool proposed, but amenity floor as indicated by architectural plans. 9. See Architectural plan. 10. Site Data table on Sheet C 1.1 has been revised to correctly show proposed density. 11. Curved "drop off has been removed in the front. 12. Two parking spaces per unit would be nice. We are exceeding code of 1 i/2 per unit. 13. Cantilevered balconies along the rear of the property have been set back to 18 feet. 14. Architectural sheets have been revised to articulate fagade. 15. Architect to provide justification of parapet. 16. Termination Status of Nonconformity for density justification is as follows: a. Perimeter buffers have been provided on the side of the proposed development. Although a portion of the side property lines do not meet the 10' buffer per code, this is due to a building issue having to provide walkway from the stairs to the right of way and access to the docks in the rear of the property. A comprehensive landscape program application has been provided. b. Almost 95% of the off-street parking lot is under the building. Upgraded landscaping has been provided in all other areas of the site. At the present time, the landscaping is minimum and what is there is almost dead. C. The building will be completely razed. There will be no nonconforming signs, outdoor light or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot. d. A comprehensive landscape program has been included in this package. Signage will be under a separate permit. 17. General applicability criteria #1 has been revised to show this project relates in harmony, scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. 18. General applicability criteria #2 has been revised to not hindering or discouraging other developments. 19. General applicability criteria #3 has been revised as to not having affects to health or safety to residents or workers. 20. General applicability criteria #4 has been revised in regards to parking and driveways. 21. General applicability criteria 45 has been revised to show how we are consistent with Island Estates. 22. General applicability criteria 96 has been revised to explain minimum adverse effects. 23. Site data table on Sheet C1.1 has been revised to show correct ISR. 24. Residential infill project criteria #6 has been revised to detail justification of setbacks, height, etc. Mr. Wayne Wells July 7, 2005 Page Four • 25. Residential infill project criteria #4 has been revised to show compatibility with adjacent land uses. 26. Residential infill project criteria #5 has been revised to detail how project will upgrade immediate vicinity. 27. Residential infill project criteria #6 has been revised to show how it creates a form and function to enhance the community. 28. Residential infill project criteria #7 has been revised in regards to lot width, setback and height to benefit community. 29. I must have been sleeping when I submitted the application showing two responses to residential infill project. They will be combined. 30. Submitted with this letter is one revised Civil drawings signed and sealed and 14 copies for CDB. This concludes my responses to the DRC comments submitted on June 30, 2005. Sincerely, Doreen A. Williams Project Director 07;11/2005 16:03 June 6, 2005 7274468 Mr. Wayne Wells Plattner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-05045 , 405 Island Way DRC Responses Dear Mr. Wells: NORTHSIDE ENG quQq Listed below are our responses to the June 30, 2005 Development Review Comments. PAGE 02/05 General En ' eerie 1. Prior to building permit, a separate right-of-way permit will be obtained. 2. Applicant responsible for all associated fees and other installation fees for the City of Clearwater's installation of water tap, water meters and back flow preventor. 3. Condominium plat will be recorded prior to issuance of C.O. Environmental 1. The underground vault was designed due to the fact that there is no room on the sides of the property for retention. Due to the fact that stairs exit on both sides of the property, a sidewalk needed to be in place for residents to be able to have access to the right of way. The rear of the property, which is waterside also prevents us (rota a pond since docks will be installed and pedestrian access must be obtained. 2. A oil and grease trap separator or comparable treatment system to capture auto pollutants will be provided. 3. See attached vault maintenance schedule. Fire 1. It is acknowledged that fire has not approved or reviewed any construction. plans or documents other than site work. 2. Underground water mains and hydrants to be installed completely, tested and in service prior to construction. 3. A 7 '/2' front and side clearance and a 4' rear clearance has been provided around hydrant. 4. A 7 %z' fxont, side and rear clearance has been provided for FDC maintenance. 07/11/2005 16:03 Mr. Wayne Wells June 6, 2005 Page Two 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 03/05 Lands I. See Comprehensive Landscape Program. 2. Vehicular use area has been reduced (See site table). Curbing has been installed on interior islands where interior islands are provided, 95% of the vehicular area is located under the building. 3. Parking lot interior landscaping has been crosshatched. 4. See Sheet L1.1 for revised front buffer. 5. Fire line has been relocated to be closer to the building. 6. See revised narrative on Comprehensive Landscape Program. Parks and Recreation No issues Solid Waste I. Recycling will be staged in the trash shoot area in the building. The project has proposed a i 0x 10 dumpster pad along Island Way Blvd. Recycling will be rolled out on different days than the dumpster. 2. See architectural, drawings regarding shear wall 3. See Sheet C3.1 for one-way and do not enter signage. 4. See Sheet C3.1 showing white pavement directional arrows. 5. See Sheet C3.1 for revised column and parking layout. 6. H/C Stall has been provided and sign details will comply with City standards. Transportation. Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to C.Q. Planning 1. Lot acreage on Sheet C1.I has been revised to read 0.676 acres. 2. See Sheet C3.1 for revised stairs and architectural plan. 3. Building dimensions are shown on Sheet C2.1. 4. Existing docks are to remain and sidewalk access has been provided. See Sheet C3.1. 5. Unity of Title to be recorded prior to building permit. 6. Sheets EL-1 and EL-1 indicate areas to receive specific colors per color selection chart. 7. Sheet A-3 has been revised to indicate proper floor level. Top floor level layout has been provided. 8. No pool proposed, but amenity floor as indicated by architectural plans. 9. See Architectural plan. 10. Site Data table on Sheet C 1.1 has been revised to correctly show proposed density. 11. Curved "drop off has been removed in the front. 12. Two parking spaces per unit would be nice. We are exceeding code of 1 %Z pcr unit. 1.3. Cantilevered balconies along the rear of the property have been set back to 18 feet. 14. Architectural sheets have been revised to articulate fagade. 07/11/2005 16:03 7274468(f NORTHSIDE ENG Q"Lq PAGE 04/05 Mr. Wayne Wells June 7, 2005 Page Three 15. Architect to provide justification of parapet. 16. Termination Status of Nonconformity for density justification is as follows: a. Perimeter buffers have been provided on the side of the proposed development. Although a portion of the side property lines do not meet the 10' buffer per code, this is due to a building issue having to provide walkway from the stairs to the right of way and access to the docks in the rear of the property. A comprehensive landscape program application has been provided. b. Almost 95% of the off-street parking lot is under the building. Upgraded landscaping has been provided in all other areas of the site. At the present time, the landscaping is minimum and what is there is almost dead. C. The building will be completely razed. There will be no nonconforming signs, outdoor light or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot. d. A comprehensive landscape program, has been included in this package. Signage will be under, a separate permit. 17. General applicability criteria #1 has been revised to show this project relates in harmony, scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. 18. General applicability criteria #2 has been revised to not hindering or discouraging other developments. 19. General applicability criteria #3 has been revised as to not having affects to health or safety to residents or workers. 20. General applicability criteria #4 has been revised in, regards to parking and driveways. 21. General applicability criteria #5 has been revised to show how we are consistent with Island Estates. 22. General applicability criteria #6 has been revised to explain minimum adverse effects. 23. Site data table on Sheet C1.1 has been revised to show correct ISR. 24• Residential in.fiill project criteria #6 has been revised to detail justification of setbacks, height, etc. 25. Residential infill. project criteria #4 has been revised to show compatibility with adjacent land uses. 26. Residential infill project criteria #5 has been revised to detail how project will upgrade immediate vicinity. 27. Residential infill project criteria #6 has been revised to show how it creates a form and.function to enhance the community. 28. Residential infi.ll project criteria #7 has been revised in regards to lot width., setback and height to benefit community. 29. I must have been sleeping when I submitted the application showing two responses to residential infill project. They will be combined. 07/11/2005 16:03 727446 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 05/05 Mx. Wayne Wells July 7, 2045 Page Four 30. Submitted with this letter is one revised Civil drawings signed and sealed and 14 copies for CDB. This concludes my responses to the ZINC comments submitted on June 30, 2005. Sincerely, Doreen A. Williams Project Director 07/11/2005 16:03 727446 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 01/05 r Y 4 clvIL . LAND PLANNING • 5"4 " Smti&", close. ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DATE., r1W ?-' - l LLPACE I OF - -? TO: .FAXNO: J ^- O: FROM 'h OY PROTECT NAME: ko COMMENTS: 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CL.EARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 (727) 443-2869 Fax: (727) 446-8036 E-MAIL: NMTECH@MrADSPRING.C'OM 4 JUL 11 2005 tla PL.BASE DO NOT HwrATE TO CONTACT OUR OFFICE SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING TINTS PROTECT CIVIL • LANG PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORI-ATION • June 6, 2005 RECEIVED .?1 11 1 1 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way DRC Responses PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL Dear Mr. Wells: Listed below are our responses to the June 30, 2005 Development Review Comments. General Engineering 1. Prior to building permit, a separate right-of-way permit will be obtained. 2. Applicant responsible for all associated fees and other installation fees for the City of Clearwater's installation of water tap, water meters and back flow preventor. 3. Condominium plat will be recorded prior to issuance of C.O. Environmental 1. The underground vault was designed due to the fact that there is no room on the sides of the property for retention. Due to the fact that stairs exit on both sides of the property, a sidewalk needed to be in place for residents to be able to have access to the right of way. The rear of the property, which is waterside also prevents us from a pond since docks will be installed and pedestrian access must be obtained. 2. A oil and grease trap separator or comparable treatment system to capture auto pollutants will be provided. 3. See attached vault maintenance schedule. Fire 1. It is acknowledged that fire has not approved or reviewed any construction plans or documents other than site work. 2. Underground water mains and hydrants to be installed completely, tested and in service prior to construction. 3. A 7 '/2' front and side clearance and a 4' rear clearance has been provided around hydrant. 4. A 7 '/2' front, side and rear clearance has been provided for FDC maintenance. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN(DMINDSPRING.COM NESTECN @MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 15. Architect to provide justification of parapet. 16. Termination Status of Nonconformity for density justification is as follows: a. Perimeter buffers have been provided on the side of the proposed development. Although a portion of the side property lines do not meet the 10' buffer per code, this is due to a building issue having to provide walkway from the stairs to the right of way and access to the docks in the rear of the property. A comprehensive landscape program application has been provided. b. Almost 95% of the off-street parking lot is under the building. Upgraded landscaping has been provided in all other areas of the site. At the present time, the landscaping is minimum and what is there is almost dead. C. The building will be completely razed.. There will be no nonconforming signs, outdoor light or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot. d. A comprehensive landscape program has been included in this package. Signage will be under a separate permit. 17. General applicability criteria #1 has been revised to show this project relates in harmony, scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. 18. General applicability criteria #2 has been revised to not hindering or discouraging other developments. 19. General applicability criteria #3 has been revised as to not having affects to health or safety to residents or workers. 20. General applicability criteria #4 has been revised in regards to parking and driveways. 21. General applicability criteria #5 has been revised to show how we are consistent with Island Estates. 22. General applicability criteria #6 has been revised to explain minimum adverse effects. 23. Site data table on Sheet C 1.1 has been revised to show correct ISR. 24. Residential infili project criteria #6 has been revised to detail justification of setbacks, height, etc. 25. Residential infill project criteria #4 has been revised to show compatibility with adjacent land uses. 26. Residential infill project criteria #5 has been revised to detail how project will upgrade immediate vicinity. 27. Residential infill project criteria #6 has been revised to show how it creates a form and function to enhance the community. 28. Residential infill project criteria #7 has been revised in regards to lot width, setback and height to benefit community. 29. I must have been sleeping when I submitted the application showing two responses to residential infill project. They will be combined. • Mr. Wayne Wells July 7, 2005 Page Three E 30. Submitted with this letter is one revised Civil drawings signed and sealed and 14 copies for CDB. This concludes my responses to the DRC comments submitted on June 30, 2005. Ai rely, Doreen A. Williams Project Director ORIGINAL RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLFAMNAMP 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 2:45 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-05045, 405 Island Way Doreen - Attached are the Draft 6.30.05 DRC comments for the above case. Wayne 7J draft 6.30.05 dre action agend... Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 3:19 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: 405 Island Way 1;5 letter of repleteness 6.8.05. E C Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 6:06 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: 405 Island Way letter of repleteness 6.8.05.. LL 0 CITY OF CLERWATER ° Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. COM June 08, 2005 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, Fl 33755 RE: FLD2005-05045 -- 405 ISLAND WAY -- Letter of Completeness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-05045. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on June 30, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne. Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, xj?? M. 06??4 Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-05045 - 405 ISLAND WAY CIVIC,. • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION 0 June 2, 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-05045 405 Island Way Dear Mr. Wells: Please find listed below our responses to your letter of incompleteness dated June 1, 2005. 1. Sheet C2.1 has all setbacks indicated, ie, balconies, etc. 2. Exhibit A to the application has been revised to show correct lot width, setbacks and height variances. 3. See Sheet C2.1 for dimensions of angled parking spaces. 4. See Sheet C2.1 for outdoor lighting fixtures. 5. Sheets El-1 and El-2 have been revised to indicate the building height elevation from BFE to roof deck being at 45'11". 6. Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been revised. 7. Sheet L1.1 has been revised. 8. See Sheet C2.1 and Sheet L1.1 indicating existing trees being preserved and removed. 9. Floor layout for the top level is provided as requested. 10. We are providing also a second level layout indicating the center space is actually an amenities area, not a Unit Type A. Unit Type A only happens at the 3`d and 4`h level therefore, the unit count is only 26 dwelling units. If you have any additional comments, please feel free to call. icerely, JD!eje-n A. Williams Project Director JUN 0 0 2005 €,01 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 '_LEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN0MINDSPRIN6.COM _`TTECH@MINDSPRINC_COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 - 446 - 8036 ORIGINAL Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 11:50 AM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-05045, 405 Island Way Doreen- Attached is the Letter of Incompleteness. The original letter is being sent. Wayne 7 letter of completeness 6.1.0. clearWate,* CITY OF CL RWATER > PLANNING DE ARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEAR WATER.COM June 01, 2005 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, F133755 RE: FLD2005-05045 -- 405 ISLAND WAY -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-05045. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. r 1. Indicate on Sheet C2.1 the balconies and the proposed setbacks to all property lines. Revise Sheet C 1.1 to indicate proposed setback reductions to all property lines for these balconies (see Section 3-908.D). Revise Exhibit A of application to indicate all reductions (lot width and setbacks) and increases to building height. , 3. Provide on Sheet C2.1 the angle of the angled parking spaces. 44. Indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. 1, 5 Revise Sheets EL-1 and EL-2 to indicate the building height from BFE to the roof deck. J6. A Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted. It is unclear why, as there is nothing indicating what is being modified. Revise Exhibit A to application. 7. Landscape Plan Sheet L1.1 does not indicate the required or provided landscape buffering. Revise. Based on the submittal, the following reductions appear apparent: a reduction to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Unclear as to interior landscape area provided. J8. Based on the survey, there are existing palm trees on-site. Site Plan Sheet C2.1, nor Sheet Ll.1, indicate these existing trees and whether they are being preserved or removed. Revise. 19. Based on the front elevation on Sheet EL-1, the top floor is not "typical" as indicated on Sheet A-1. Provide a floor layout for the top floor. 410. Based on the typical floor layout on Sheet A-1 and the elevations on Sheets EL-1 and EL-2, there are 27 dwellings proposed. However, the application and the site data on Sheet C 1.1 as to the number of proposed dwelling units, there should be only 26 units. Revise/advise. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 10:00 am on Monday, June 6, 2005. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-05045 - 405 ISLAND WAY LL o CITY OF CL?RWATER • oa?ater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W WW.MYCLEARWATER.COM June 01, 2005 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, t Wayn??e?Vells Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-05045 - 405 ISLAND WAY • Northside safe. ' LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: May 25, 2005 To: City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Attn: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst Reference: Harborside - 405 Island Way Blvd. NES Project #510 We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover () Mail () Courier (} Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered () Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment () For Your Use () For Your Approval () For Your Files () For Your Information CIVIL • LAND PLANNINC, • ENVIROWAENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL (X)Originals (X) Prints () Addendum () Shop Drawings () Specifications (X) Applications ( ) Floppy Disk COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 15 05/26/05 Civil & Landscape Drawings (5 sheets) (1) sets signed & sealed 15 05/26/05 Reduced Site Plan 15 05/26/05 Reduced Colored Landscape Plan 15 05/26/05 Flex Development Res. Infill Application) 15 05/26/05 Letters of Authorization 15 05/26/05 Warrant Deeds 15 05/26/05 Surveys 1 signed & sealed 15 05/26/05 Stormwater Report 1 signed & sealed 15 05/26/05 Reduced Colored Renderings Architectural 15 05/26/05 Reduced Building Elevations 15 05/26/05 Color Charts 15 05/26/05 Architectural Drawings 1 05/26/05 Ck #1242 in the amount of $1,205.00 15 Comprehensive Landscape Application & 15 L1.1) Comments: Design Review Committee for May 26, 2005 deadline Co ies To: File \ oWilliams, Project Director 601 CLL,/ELAND STREET, SUI CLEA" _ ,TER, FLORIDA 3, NE` P ',''I >MINDSPRIN- h uMINDSPRING.COE 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 MAY 2 6 2005 a 0 CDB Meeting Date: August 16, 2005 Case Numbers: FLD2005-05045 Agenda Item: F6 Owner: Ronald and Karen Kozan Applicant: Newkirk Ventures Inc. Representative: Mr. Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Address: 405 Island Way CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: ORIGINAL REQUEST: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (26 existing and proposed attached dwelling units; 20 dwelling units maximum under land use category), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 26 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 feet to 144.65 feet, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building) from 25 feet to 20 feet (to balcony), from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 6.1 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 6.1 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to five feet (to sidewalk) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to 46 feet (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of six feet (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-404.17, and reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District; Residential LAND USE: High (RH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: 0.676 acres; 29,465 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached dwellings (26 units) Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (26 units - condominium) Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05045 - Page 1 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Medium High Density Residential District; Attached LAND USES: dwellings East: Preservation District; Water South: Medium High Density Residential District; Attached dwellings West: High Density Residential District; Attached dwellings CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is developed with attached dwellings. Detached dwellings are across the canal to the east and farther north on Island Way. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.676 acres is located on the east side of Island Way, approximately 300 feet south of Skiff Point. The site has 144.65 feet of frontage on Island Way and is currently developed with 26 attached dwellings in a two-story, U-shaped building. There is some covered parking along the west side of the building. All existing improvements, excluding the dock, are planned to be demolished. The subject property is an area of Island Estates that is dominated by attached dwellings of varying heights. The property to the direct north at 415 Island Way is presently developed with 12 attached dwellings in a two-story building on the east side of the property and is currently being processed for redevelopment in a manner similar to the subject proposal with attached dwellings in a four- story building over ground-level parking (FLD2005-04035, on this same CDB agenda). The property to the direct south at 333 Island Way is currently developed with attached dwellings in two-story buildings. Parcels farther south are developed with attached dwellings of two-stories over ground-level parking or taller buildings. Directly to the west across Island Way is a 16-story attached dwelling building at 400 Island Way. Properties across the canal to the east are developed with single family dwellings zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District, as well as parcels farther north on Island Way. Proposal: The proposal is to redevelop the site with 26 attached dwellings in one building. The western portion of the building will have three interconnected "wings," served by common elevators and stairs. The north and south "wings" are four stories in height, containing one dwelling per floor of 1,870 square feet of living area. The center "wing" is three stories in height, with an amenity room for the residents on the second floor and one dwelling per floor otherwise of 1,660 square feet of living area. Sixteen dwelling units, each approximately 1,954 square feet of living area, are proposed in the eastern portion of the building (four dwelling units per floor). Under the Termination of Status of Nonconformity provisions, there are four required improvements: Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05045 - Page 2 of 11 9 0 1. Installation of perimeter buffers. Perimeter buffers of fifteen feet along Island Way and 10 feet along the north and south sides of the property are required by the Code. The applicant is requesting reductions to these buffers: a) along Island Way from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area) - The reduction to 10 feet to pavement occurs in the southwest corner of the parcel, where the western (rear) edge of the angled parking space is within the required buffer. The distance from the front property line to the front edge of the angled parking space is 20 feet. Based on an average between the rear and front of the angled parking space, the intent of the buffer is satisfied. In regard to the reduction related to the trash staging area, the building will have refuse collection rooms on the ground floor within the parking garage. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site. b) along the north side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) - The building and pavement meet the required setback and buffer along this edge of the property. The reduction is due to a Building Code requirement for a sidewalk from the stairs from the upper floors to the sidewalk within the right-of-way. c) along the south side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) - The building and pavement also meet the required setback and buffer along this edge of the property. The reduction here is the same as "b" above. The applicant has submitted a Comprehensive Landscape Program to offset the above reductions (see "4" below). 2. Improvement of off-street parking lots. The applicant is removing all existing improvements and is providing parking that meets Code provisions. 3. Removal of nonconforming signs outdoor lighting or other accessory structures. The applicant is removing all existing improvements. Any future signage will need to meet current Code provisions. 4. Use of Comprehensive Sign Program and Comprehensive Landscape Programs to satisfy requirements. The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available under the Code to residential properties. The applicant has submitted a Comprehensive Landscape Program to satisfy the requested reductions to the landscape buffer requirements listed above. The reductions along the north and south side represent 55 percent of the length of the property depth. The eastern portion of the property exceeds the required buffer width. Landscape areas along the front exceed the required buffer, providing adequate areas for landscaping of the site. Landscaping includes tiering of landscape materials for visual interest and improves the site appearance. Landscaping proposed may be viewed as being more attractive than minimum landscape standards. The proposal includes a reduction to lot width for attached dwellings from 150 feet to 144.65 feet. The lot was developed on one and one-half of platted lots in its current manner in 1962. Abutting lots to the north and south are developed with existing attached dwellings. While the lot to the north is also proposed to be redeveloped on a similarly sized lot, each development is by different developers. The lot width can be viewed as being a minor reduction, with no ability to meet current requirements. The flexibility in regard to lot width is justified by the benefits to the Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05045 - Page 3 of 11 0 9 surrounding area and to the City by allowing redevelopment of the property with new, modern buildings meeting current Building Codes and significant increases to landscaping. The request is being processed as a Residential Infill Project due to the height increase and setback reductions to pavement, sidewalks and the trash staging area. The application was mistakenly advertised to include reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building) from 25 feet to 20 feet (to balcony). The center "wing" of the building is proposed 37.8 feet to the front property line, with the balcony proposed 31.8 feet to the front property line, both exceeding the minimum 25-foot front setback requirement. The proposal includes reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 6.1 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk - 5.4 feet advertised) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 6.1 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk - five feet advertised). In regard to the front setback reduction related to the trash staging area, the eastern building will have a trash collection room on the ground floor. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site. The proposal includes a front setback reduction to 10 feet to the rear (west) edge of the southern angled parking space and a reduction to 16 feet to the front (west) edge of the northern angled parking space. The existing development on this site presently is at a zero front setback to pavement, with no landscaping in the front setback area. Most existing attached dwelling developments along Island Way have no or very little landscaping in the front setback area, with most pavements at the front property line (any grass or landscaping appears to be within the right- of-way). While the proposal does not fully meet the Code requirements, the proposal significantly increases the amount of landscaping in the front setback. The reductions to the side setbacks proposed are to above ground balconies (one per floor), located 6.1 feet from the side property lines and to the sidewalks from the building stairs. The property is currently developed with the residential building at a side setback of 8.4 feet (north side) and 7.8 feet (south side) and pavement at a side setback of approximately four feet. The proposed building and pavement meet the required setback and buffer along this edge of the property. The reductions along the north and south side represent 55 percent of the length of the property depth. The eastern portion of the north and south sides of the property exceeds the required buffer width. The dwellings proposed on this property average approximately 1,900 square feet each, which are moderately sized units in today's condominium market. The proposed building is located at a rear setback of 18 feet (to building, meeting Building Code requirements) and 16 feet (to cantilevered balconies), which exceeds the minimum required rear setback of 15 feet. The existing residential building is approximately at a 24.5-foot rear setback. The requested flexibility in regard to required setbacks are justified by the benefits to an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area and to the City as a whole for both buildings and landscaping. The redevelopment of this parcel may be viewed as otherwise impractical without the requested deviations from the required setbacks, and all setback reductions are to non-building structures (except the above ground balconies on the north and south sides of the building). Additionally, the design of this project creates a form and function that enhances the character of the surrounding area, which breaks up the scale and massing of the buildings. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05045 - Page 4 of 11 While there are driveways to the on-site parking on the north and south sides of the property, the site today appears as one large driveway, as there is pavement along the width of the property from the curbing of the Island Way roadway to the property line. There is striped, parallel parking within the right-of=way. The proposal removes the entire pavement within the right-of-way and provides an entrance driveway on the south and an exit driveway on the north. The applicant is providing 43 parking spaces, exceeding the minimum required parking of 39 spaces. Parking for the condominium units are provided under the building or in open parking off these directional drives. While not shown on the site plan, a four-foot high opaque fence or wall is required along the west, north and south property lines to screen off-street parking from the adjacent parcels and roadway. The proposed building has been designed at a height of 46 feet above BFE (four stories over ground level garage parking) with perimeter parapets of six feet in height (from roof deck). The elevator and stairs extend less than 14 feet above the roof deck. As a Flexible Development use, the Code provides a building height range from 30 to 50 feet for attached dwellings. While the proposed height is greater than that of the existing adjacent residential buildings to the north and south, the proposed height is less than the maximum height allowable and will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, density and character of surrounding properties. A similar development proposal for a four-story (43.17 feet above BFE) over ground level parking directly north is on this same Community Development Board agenda (FLD2005-04035, 415 Island Way). A 16-story residential building is directly west across Island Way from this property. Redevelopment of this parcel meeting current Building Codes (including meeting FEMA requirements) with a development that is marketable with units of adequate size is otherwise impractical without deviations from the height standards of the MHDR District. Flexibility in regard to building height is justified by the benefits to an upgraded site that is compatible with the surrounding character and that benefits the City with a redeveloped site that reduces flood hazards to residential property. The increase for the parapets may be viewed as making them proportional in respect to the height of the building and to aid in the screening of the rooftop air conditioning units. The elevator and stairwells towers have been designed meeting the maximum allowable Code height of 16 feet from the rooftop. A sidewalk along the Island Way right-of-way will be constructed as part of this redevelopment proposal, increasing pedestrian safety by the constriction of driveway access to the directional driveways. Site drainage is proposed within a retention vault under the building. It is noted that the windows and sliding glass door shown on the front elevation for the center "wing" are not accurate to the floor plans submitted. The floor plans indicate two sliding glass doors and a wider balcony than that indicated on the front elevation. While not shown on the plans, the existing dock is planned to be retained. Use of this dock will need to be restricted to use of the condominium residents and/or their guests. The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. Future signage will need to meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign must be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the buildings. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05045 - Page 5 of 11 Staff's support for this proposal is based on the reasons enumerated above. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding properties. The redevelopment of this site will improve the appearance of this site and the surrounding area. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Residential Infill Project criteria (Section 2-404.F) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05045 - Page 6 of I 1 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: Section 2-404.F STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 26 dwelling units (a) X* DENSITY (30 dwelling units per acre) (20 dwelling units maximum) IMPERVIOUS 0.70 X SURFACE RATIO ISR 0.85 maximum LOT AREA (For 0.676 acres; 29,465 square feet X attached dwellings: 15,000 sq. feet minimum LOT WIDTH (For 144.65 feet X* attached dwellings: 150 feet minimum FRONT SETBACK 37.8 feet (to building), 31.8 feet (to X* (15-25 feet) balcony), 10 feet (to pavement) and zero feet (to trash staging area) REAR SETBACK 18 feet (to building), 16 feet (to X (10-15 feet balconies) and 24 feet (to pavement) SIDE SETBACK North: 10.5 feet (to building), 10 feet X* (0-10 feet) (to pavement), 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and 6.1 feet (to balcony) South: 10.5 feet (to building), 10 feet (to pavement), 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and 6.1 feet to balcony) HEIGHT (For 46 feet (to roof deck) with perimeter X* attached dwellings: parapets of six feet (from roof deck) 30-50 feet maximum) PARKING SPACES 43 spaces (1.65 spaces per unit) X (1.5 spaces per unit - attached dwellings; 39 spaces required) (a) Includes the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for 26 existing attached dwellings. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05045 - Page 7 of 11 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-404.F): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in X the district. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with X adjacent lands uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and X function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. * See discussion under Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAI, STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05045 - Page 8 of I I 0 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.676 acres is zoned Medium High Density Residential District and has 144.65 feet of lot width; 2. The current use of the site is for 26 attached dwellings, which is nonconforming to current density limitations, in a two-story building not meeting current FEMA requirements; 3. Based on current Land Use Category density limitations of 30 dwelling units per acre, the subject site may be redeveloped with a maximum of 20 dwelling units; 4. The proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity to allow the reconstruction of the same 26 dwelling units on the property; 5. The lot width of 144.65 feet does not meet current Code requirements for attached dwellings of 150 feet; 6. The applicant proposes to redevelop the site with one residential building with a height of 46 feet (to roof deck) above Base Flood Elevation (BFE) (four stories over ground level parking). The height increase for this building is within the Flexible Development range for attached dwellings. While the height is not consistent with the existing developed character of the properties to the north and south, it is compatible with surrounding development, including the 16-story building to the west; 7. All buildings meet required setbacks. Setback reductions requested are to non-building elements (pavement, trash staging area and sidewalks). Even with the reductions requested, the landscape area is significantly increased over existing conditions; 8. Parking provided meets and exceeds the minimum requirements of the Code; 9. The proposed site design with one entrance and exit driveway represents an improvement over the existing condition; 10. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development, will enhance the character of the immediate vicinity and will improve the appearance of this site and the surrounding area; and 11. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-404.17; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 30, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (26 existing and proposed attached dwelling units; 20 dwelling units maximum under land use category), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development application to permit 26 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05045 - Page 9 of 11 0 0 width from 150 feet to 144.65 feet, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 6.1 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 6.1 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to 46 feet (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of six feet (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-404.17, and reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for the site at 405 Island Way, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-404.F. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That the windows and sliding glass doors on the front elevation be coordinated with that indicated on the floor plans prior to the issuance of the building permit; 4. That the site and landscape plans be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to show a four-foot high, landscaped opaque fence or wall along the west, north and south property lines to screen off-street parking from the adjacent parcels and roadway; 5. That boats moored at the existing or future dock, lifts and/or slips be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; 6. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; 7. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 8. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed underground; 9. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 10. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 11. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits, including any extension of the fire riser to the north for the future docks. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05045 - Page 10 of 11 11 Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: "'V M=I'A Wayne Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S. (Planning DepartmenPC D BTLEX (FLD)IPendi,ng casesVp for the next CDBUsland Way 405 Harborside (MHDR) - 8.16.05 CDB - WW Island Way 405 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05045 - Page 11 of 11 0 0 MANDO Sr ASTER Ej ST CA.BPo/, ? ^^Q 4 F1EIAVUBD PAY AV u 09 PROJECT BAY ESPLANADE SITE IWIX y A, ?. J. 4'N Pn' BAYMONT ST '^?f W y aVf ?P mg7? ??N ppY7f tl ? t PAPAYA ST to Dow PABSXGF. y4?t 0 am WINMARD Rq 4 RRSr or OR ST ^ O y aR+?++r WATER OR Q Form sr QP Location Map Cwvner. Ronald and Karen Kozan Case: FLD2005-05045 Site: 405 Island Way Property 0.676 e s): Si PIN: 08/29/15/43326/000/0150 Atlas Page: 2678 • 4b 1 • l t y? ?I a; . m Aerial Map owner. Ronald and Karen Kozan Case: FLD2005-05045 Site: 405 Island Way Property Size(Acres): 0.676 PIN: 08/29/15/43326/000/0150 Atlas Page: 2676 • • 44 ?__,_ 1$eiE •hed'; he !ling ` 400 M• c>rq?ell n p -- !! I D ? ? 4+w 4ba' / \\ \ 43_7A ° if 431 \\, ` Atc e r_ "dwelli s Clubh a <<--I 42 ' ` -' -- for,400' ` - 1 1 1---- ! ch - PT Islabd `-- y d4 li _, n SKIFF a,5 1 \ 1 1 , 1 _- 423 ?, ; ` '----412 t 4Attache4 Welling? d 4 414 * ; ed 1t Attakhed a OweIli s dwellings a 'Owe A tached in -, `d ellin s Attac I, welliw-1 P-1 - c- ac r _ i Elw, llin s? y Attach'" r--1 -, d 1\ \vll we in (--J30; `+ ? I i 320 i - Att c Od jAtiacfied r4i1 AHAgs ?310AM 3ar" L_ ?? 1 __d?velll , _ I 231 1 1 , II r- _! --- 229 1 -_a24 222 215 Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner: Ronald and Karen Kozan Case: FLD2005-05045 Site: 405 Island Way Property 0.676 Size(Acres) : PIN: 08/29/15/43326/000/0150 Atlas Page: 267B 0 0 View looking northeast at subject property View looking east at existing attached dwellings directly north of subject property (415 Island Way) 405 Island Way FLD2005-05045 View looking southeast at existing dock on subject property with detached dwellings on Leeward Island in background View looking east at attached dwellings farther north of subject property (427 Island Way) Page 1 of 2 vx iw?" t?+ • • View looking east at property on east side of Island Way south of subject property (333 Island Way) Lam, View looking southeast at properties on east side of Island Way farther south of subject property 405 Island Way FLD2005-05045 { View looking northwest at property on west side of Island Way directly west of subject property (400 Island Way) Page 2 of 2 View looking east at property on east side of Island Way south of subject property (325 Island Way) 0 0 !- \ - -? \ 1 , 450 v ? '' l ll - i t , ` 1 "40 11 < `? 431 'ro 431 _ 4\I 429 ,, --? 42 1 16 ° y 1 ? 1 - ? 425 \ \ 1 ? ? ?' ??, 42 412 1 ; X419 411 -- 1 415 405 ; 14 4qg 1 1 / P ' m 1 f 333 37- 1 _ N ?fDR, 3i5 321 'N, 1 1 1 , , ?, ` 1 1 1 I ?1 1 ! ` 1 1 320 1' 310 VYtM 1 _ ` i I ?t 1 231 1 1 , 1 229 --a24 Zoning Map Owner. Ronald and Karen Kozan Case: FLD2005-05045 Site: 405 Island Way Prope e 0.676 rt s): PIN: 08/29/15/43326/000/0150 Atlas Page: 2678 0 0 Conditions Associated With FLD2005-05045 405 ISLAND WAY Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 06/14/2005 No issues, based on termination of 26 units being replaced with reconstruction of 26 units. If Not Met number of new units changes fees may be due. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 06/15/2005 How will recycling be handled and staged Not Met Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 06/01/2005 7/14/05 - WW Not Met Response from engineer says existing dock to remain and a sidewalk for access to it has been shown. Can't see it on the plans. Revise. 6/1/05 - WW Since there is no demolition plan submitted and it isn't shown on the site plan on Sheet C2.1, it is assumed that the existing dock will be removed as part of the proposal. If this is incorrect, please revise Sheet C2.1 to show the existing dock and access to the dock. 06/01/2005 Potential condition to be included in Staff Report: Not Met That prior to the issuance of any permits a Unity of Title be recorded, with a copy of the recorded document provided to the Planning Department; 06/01/2005 8/9/05 - WW Not Met Still inconsistent. Include as a condition of approval. 7/14/05 - WW Based on the floor plans on Sheets A-1 and A-2 for Units A, the floor plans indicate sliding glass doors on the west side, yet the building elevations on Sheet EL-1 indicate a center sliding glass door with windows on either sides of the sliding glass door. Coordinate floor plans and elevation regarding Unit A doors/windows on the west side. 6/1/05 - WW Based on the typical floor layout on Sheet A-1 and the elevations on Sheets EL-1 and EL-2, the windows indicated on the north and south sides of the end Unit C's and on the north and south sides of Units A are not shown on the typical floor layout. Additionally, the windows indicated on the west side of Unit A on the elevations are not shown on the typical floor layout, and the doors and balcony are different for Unit A's. Revise. Print Date: 08/09/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 Ll • Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 2:28 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Faessler, Heather Subject: FLD2005--5-45 - 405 Island Way Wayne, Engineering has completed review of resubmittal and updated Permit Plan on the subject resubmittal. Approval condition: The Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy (Ordinance No. 86-43, Section 150). D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 3:10 PM To: Planning Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: FYI -----Original Message----- From: Blackburn, Anne Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 2:56 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Hi Sherry Fire's conditions on: FLD2005-05045, and FLD2005-05047, and FLD2005-05048, have been met. Thanks for all your help, Anne -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 3:39 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way 2. FLD2005-05047 - 430 Gulfview Blvd 3. FLD2005-05048 - 331 Cleveland Street I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. Thank you and have a great day Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:45 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Case- FLD2005-05051- 445 Hamden Drive has arrived it is also in the same location Thank you Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases havePeen resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, 4 meeting: 1. FLD2005-05037 -1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 -1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schodlter 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 -1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark & Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Sherry Watkins • v `e' 9 6 7 's ' s 4 'iw , , CITY OF CLEARW f ER .. s, t AND VICI 2 s-t r.w 6i [hL`t Q? PMUAS COUNTY FLORIDA C? 4 -- _ +w t PREPARED BY "- 8T sso PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION .' ENCIKERINC. 1p /pl7tCU lP/It -- - e/O ? 100 Y. e.aa .ve.. Cleu.aln « 11156 t? L C(,L ?rl? Pn: (etils6T-.7so, rat: wi)"s-.7ss FP IIARBDR Gv_ CSR 40 {5 {{ 6S a 41 ?i ? 1Y-149 .to CA y&1 44, , w +y es .te wool.".'; ,(/?-{n 38 ?` 40 D ,? 47 IN { Puaic hiamotion data To arnronsd by the ary or aewwaar rJ (. (x/)t•?-?C 35 C s a 65 a] Pualt woe k• Admbisirotbn/6ngin6wMg, and mutt oa O-pt.d so 42 k and uxd by the beloichl old, the under', ilhOlg that the data 01 67ff? 41 N 46 I,6 recelwd vas collected fa the purPOx of deref,ps q o graphic 34 ff (w 0 66 1 "'fXcelNcture [nxnlmy. As such, the Pty of Cleol-ler PWA/E N 170 it 4 -0 " no vwronll.t, s/DIMSSd or 4 Pll.d. concernlnq tna )} ,? tt 19 1 oewracy. comdelanesa. rNloWtlty, or tuttotoNlty of this dote tar Cam( 420 /[t r 67 any ether DMIICWw u <. furlnermote, In< City of Cleorwalr I®1 .I A? ?. . N N 'y' n .(l 4r ?? O L t1 oQ? +so ?' GOt.Qt ?? Yty {.i6F t) P A? N e? G ? . i 15 N d 4D 50 m s 1 400 39 5 38 t 69 69 PWA /E os'um<. no nobility what'.... ....doted with the e misas< or -1. d.t.. °t This Atlas page is wpQ[I to 0erio F. Meam.lion .pout loteslevi.lant Pitox roll PWA/E a rylt om wee Bile. ? r t . Lb ? 1 S I , ?1 Go ityp. CD ?fY A6- 62 t] it " 37 7 N 1 CP? t3 ? Q ` ? O ? 1?D 531n to 111 `ex t7 ?6 P1 Z4ryy 01. gy ? ' 'wU' BI 11 f[t1? 36 m. r" 54 0 2t T2 , 1p0 V ]• 35 S ? 8 2. at 10 5 12101 BAY CONDB1 ffs ] I 34 056 o too 200 500 600 ?O 1t 9 . ry ? ]fi AN l ro+ ]a . " 9 y i 4 COV o Q? 'ro _pR ?aw e 57 t 33 o SCREE: 1 d00 f DOLPHIN E oro r.w. ia oa Cp ?T CONDO 20-58 1j u i a (IO 'til 9 p M11 ]]I 32 too LEGEND: '? / 1 d0 (\ 1 •? (13/08 DORY PASshGE >• M er r.Y. tit 6 r] 59 tot 3 O BLOCK ? g a t tt `t e' 13101 +N ? V1 M 60 30 a. NUMBER R ,•o t° F t [t ?o At . I..Pt \...1 n4 .t 3 i 7 9 m 6t sit q 29 D 1234 LOT ADDRESS I s 7 / )t)t-re)t 9 0 -s 12 \? tI ............. j r of ~ 63 t l0] to t4 62 Tg r01 y.) ? ??--' CITY LIMITS LINE t u O i solo i tot " ' t q G t ? ................... 1 46 83 too sot 27 r SHADED AREA - PROPERTY f.,......J _ ? s OUTSIDE CLEARwA TER CITY LIMITS 13 /O Z i ' 7' 1st 1 \? jQr ST. BRENDAN 5 t +? - -g' -~ e 61 +o n 26 AG ?. td CATHOLIC 4 t _ s 4 e" REEMENT TO ANNEX sa \ CH t 3 t-1 O? URCH \ 'II ~r . ,'IJ.? to 55 25 ++• u 2. ' CITY OWNED PROPERTY + s h 2 0 J. l Irl to u. r.r. y I 86 11` t1e MDR ZONING DESIGNATION ? d e ~ 7 9 t '0 St, .P ? ? Q1 so ? . i 13/05 do HI ~ 13 Q ?y]S 10 Ise T3 6 ZONE LINE \\ ; 4 yt y dLV 0 4 e ,3/04 13/06 Da iG 88 ro+ ter 22 I` t A No T O 9 yF4? G b o pp F V l0 s 69 20 Ti Y tea rol R \,4 roes ,b. .g ?a)tin 0, 4, MNDIVAIM $ii ¦¦ g A ¦T. T(L 1` PASSAOE (p h?a 4 e 13/07 j 4f •, Jr 7 R E 6i N 9 .E14, J e s /? z 3 !r it z to 8,19 i 'gym a Jf p/ C,? ep r 3l , •r 1 f7 ' 17 d Y^^~,}? tt wee... t Q 4 ? 171R[v+Y/?QtiQm V [<V y r 76 3 ?' y"s O .eg , N, G 5 ., tl 15 7Ccvn?.o y °0 °HORIZON HOUgE ° n # 14 ?B 9 ° y coot. 7 7 ^ 6'' U ROC, !D ed 13 8„ yr ,I .E2uN[ are ED -266 or/ro/6) M aee REVISED: 03/08/99 ZONING ATLAS NE 1/4 OF SECTION n 1 B- i5S-15 E L R Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 4:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Need to fix maps - 405 Island Way Hello Wayne North arrow is fixed. All you have to do is fill in the accommodation in the maps. T] W1 -1 7-1 zoning.doc location.doc FLD Map request existing.doc aerial.doc form 6.17.05.d... Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 -----Origi From: Sent: To: Subject: nal Message----- Wells, Wayne Thursday, July 14, 2005 2:51 PM Kambourolias, Sam Need to fix maps - 405 Island Way Sam - Attached are maps needing the north arrow fixed. Thanks. Wayne << File: Aerial Map.doc >> << File: Existing Surrounding Uses Map.doc >> << File: Location Map.doc >> << File: Zoning Map.doc >> 1 n v Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 2:51 PM To: Kambourolias, Sam Subject: Need to fix maps - 405 Island Way Sam - Attached are maps needing the north arrow fixed. Thanks. Wayne Aerial Map.doc Existing Location Map.doc Zoning Map.doc rrounding Uses Map r , 1L 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 10:50 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: fyi -----Original Message----- From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 10:35 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Sherry, P&R has reviewed and we are okay! Thanks! Debbie O -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 3:39 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way 2. FLD2005-05047 - 430 Gulfview Blvd 3. FLD2005-05048 - 331 Cleveland Street I have placed one copy of the case resubmitedl package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. Thank you and have a great day Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:45 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Case- FLD2005-05051- 445 Hamden Drive has arrived it is also in the same location Thank you Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: i0w - 1% 0 0 1. FLD2005-05037 - 1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 -1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schodlter 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 -1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark & Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Sherry Watkins f1 0 i Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 3:39 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way 2. FLD2005-05047 - 430 Gulfview Blvd 3. FLD2005-05048 - 331 Cleveland Street I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. Thank you and have a great day Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:45 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Case- FLD2005-05051- 445 Hamden Drive has arrived it is also in the same location Thank you Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, COB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05037 -1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 -1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schodlter 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 -1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark & Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Sherry Watkins 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 9:35 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbe, Bennett; Faessler, Heather Subject: FLD2005-05045 - 405 Island Way Wayne, Several issues on the above case were not resolved in the resubmittal: Traffic 1. Vertical clearance height for drop off area must be a minimum of 114 inches. 7/12/05 - NO RESPONSE 2. Design shear wall at parking spaces to allow sight visibility for motorists backing out. 7/12/05 - NO RESPONSE 5. Columns must not encroach in the parking stalls i.e. columns that are located behind wheel stops may be hit. 7/12/05 - NO RESPONSE Environmental 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 7/12/05 - NOT MET - JUSTIFICATION ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES SIDES OF PROPERTY, HOWEVER THE REAR APPEARS TO POSSESS SUFFICIENT SPACE TO ACCOMODATE ACCESS TO DOCKS AND STORMWATER TREATMENT. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. 7/12/05 - NO RESPONSE 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. 7/12/05 - NOT MET - VAULT MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE NOT INCLUDED WITH RESUBMITTAL. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com i? Case Number: FLD2005-05043 -- 405 ISLAND WAY 2:55 pm Owner(s): Ronald E Kozan 23 Camelot Dr Oak Brook, 1160523 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Newkirk Ventures, Inc. 9309 N Florida Avenue #104 Tampa, Fl 33612 TELEPHONE: 813-936-2221, FAX: 813-936-2228, E-MAIL: No Email Coo M" Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: nestech@mindspring.com Location: 0.676 acres located on the east side of Island Way, approximately 300 feet south of Skiff Point. Atlas Page: 267B Zoning District: IEOD, Island Estates Neighborhood Overlay District Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (26 existing and proposed attached dwelling units; 20 dwelling units maximum under land use category), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 26 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 feet to 144.65 feet, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 23 feet (to balcony), from 25 feet to 14 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 5.7 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 5.7 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet (to balconies) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to xx feet (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 12 feet (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-404.F, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Island Estates Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 140 Island Way #239 TELEPHONE: 442-2237, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Dolphin Cove Condo Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 255 Dolphin Point TELEPHONE: 727-442-7880, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: dlphincoveI@netzero.com Neighborhood Village On Island Estates Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 240 Windward Passage Unit 803 TELEPHONE: 727-461-3861, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: narctom@msn.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: Staff. Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Blackburn Applicant: Housh Ghovaee Other: Norma Carlough The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 50 The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 0 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727)562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the water meter and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 3. The condominium plat for this project shall be recorded prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Environmental: 1. 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Fire: 1. This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Review and approval by th authority having jurisdiction shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. 2. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 3. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet to the front and sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please respond to this commet PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet to the front, sides and rear of the FDC are required to be maintained. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. H rbor Master: 1 . No issues. Lggal: J 1 , No issues. Lrd Resources: 1 , No Issues. Landscaping: 1 , Landscape Plan Sheet L1.1 does not indicate the required or provided landscape buffering. Revise. Based on the submittal, the following reductions are apparent: a reduction to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Unclear as to interior landscape area provided. J 2. Vehicular use area exceeds 4,000 square feet and parking provided is greater than 110% of the required parking. Per Section 3-1202.E.1 Code requires a minimum of 12% of vehicular use area. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10 parking spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft., and be 8 feet wide (back of curb to back of curb). J3. Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas. 44. Plan does not meet the requirements of perimeter plantings in Code Section 3-1202.1) for the front buffer along Island Way. Revise. j 5. Relocate the fire line to the rear fire riser closer to the building to provide adequate planting area and depth to minimize conflicts with landscaping. 6. Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #ib - Provide a detailed response as to how the "design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards." Important words are "demonstrably more attractive" than "minimum landscape standards." Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 51 Parks and Recreation: • 1 . No issues, based on termination of 26 units being replaced with reconstruction of 26 units. If number of new units changes fees may be due. Stormwater: 1 . 1. See Environmental Condition. Solid Waste: How will recycling be handled and staged Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Vertical clearance height for drop off area must be a minimum of 114 inches. 2. Design shear wall at parking spaces to allow sight visibility for motorists backing out. 3. Provide one-way and do not enter signage for better internal vehicular circulation. 4. Provide white pavement directional arrows to enhance internal vehicular circulation. 5. Columns must not encroach in the parking stalls i.e. columns that are located behind wheel stops may be hit. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118) General note: The Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy (Ordinance No. 86-43, Section 150) Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 52 0 J I . Revise lot area acreage on Sheet C 1.1 from 0.68 acre to 0.676 acre. Based on the Typical Floor Layout on Sheet A-1 and the site plan on Sheet C2.1, and input from a Building Plans Examiner in the Development Services Department, the exit stairs will not meet Building Code requirements, in that egress directs people back into the parking garage level and not to the outside. Especially apparent with the stairs on the south side, there is no means to ,/ access to the sidewalk to the sidewalk in the R.O.W. Revise. 3 . Provide building dimensions on the site plan Sheet C2.1. (D Since there is no demolition plan submitted and it isn't shown on the site plan on Sheet C2.1, it is assumed that the existing dock will be removed as part of the proposal. If this is incorrect, please revise Sheet C2.1 to show the existing dock and access to the dock. O Potential condition to be included in Staff Report: That prior to the issuance of any permits a Unity of Title be recorded, with a copy of the recorded document provided to the Planning Department; 6 . Indicate on Sheets EL-1 and EL-2 what areas of the building facade will be painted the colors indicated in the Color Schedule. C7? 6/8/05 - WW Revise Sheet A-3 to indicate this as floor level 5 (not 4). 6/ 1 /05 - WW Based on the front elevation on Sheet EL-1, the top floor is not "typical" as indicated on Sheet A-1. Provide a floor layout for the top floor. )8. No pool or recreation facilities proposed? Based on the typical floor layout on Sheet A-1 and the elevations on Sheets EL-1 and EL-2, the windows indicated on the north and south sides of the end Unit C's and on the north and south sides of Units A are not shown on the typical floor layout. Additionally, the windows indicated on the west side of Unit A on the elevations are not shown on the typical floor layout, and the doors and balcony are different for Unit A's. Revise. 0 Provide the "proposed density" (units per acre) in the Site Data table on Sheet C 1.1. J11 . 6/30/05 - WW Discussed at DRC that applicant will remove the "drop off' lane in front. 6/23/05 - WW Explain the need for the curved "drop-off' lane in front. Recommend removal. 12 . Recommend providing two parking spaces per unit. Q Cantilevered balconies exceed the maximum 50% of the width of the building to which they are attached and exceed a maximum of two feet into the required rear setback of 15 feet. Provide detailed justification as to how these balconies, at a proposed 10-foot rear setback, "will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties," how this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards" and how "flexibility in regard to the required setback is justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." The adjacent property to the north is proposed (designed by same engineering firm as this proposal) at a minimum rear setback of 21.1 feet to the building (including balconies) and the existing building to the south is set back approximately 25 feet from the rear property line. Staff cannot support the requested encroachment and will recommend meeting the required rear setback of 15 feet to the edge of the balconies. This non-support is due in part to the requested Termination of Nonconforming density, as the site design promotes an overbuilding of the site. Further, will not support a movement of the entire project westward to increase the amount of encroachment into the front setback. )14. Based on the front elevation on Sheet EL-1 which portrays an indentation in the center of the north and south building wings through shading, yet the floor plans on Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 don't show such articulation of the facade. This articulation helps break up the facade plane. J 15 . Parapet above the flat roof deck for the rear portion of the building is 11.67 feet. Unclear why this height of the parapet is necessary, as it appears excessive. Code provides a maximum of 30-inches. A taller parapet (greater than Code maximum) may be appropriate to screen rooftop mechanical equipment and to provide proportion to the building. Is there something happening on this roof that Staff needs to be aware of in relation to the height of the parapet? Provide a complete justification for the proposed parapet height or reduce its height. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 53 0 J16 . Provide detailed responses to the following requirements of the Te • ion of Status of Nonconformity for density, including all justifications (Section 6-109.C): 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(D). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. J 17 . General Applicability criteria #1 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal "will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties." Provide examples of other adjacent properties as to their height, density, etc. as to how this project / relates. 18. General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal "will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof" It is noted that the "multiple buildings on the site instead of one tall building" will not provide "more ope view to the water" due to the total building's design. Address impact on value of adjacent land and buildings. 119. General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal "will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood." Give specific examples of negative and positive effects of this proposal to the surrounding "neighborhood." 20 . General Applicability criteria #4 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal will "minimize traffic congestion." Address existing conditions of parking, including the location and number of driveways, and how this proposal will be an improvement over the existing conditions, including the location and number of driveways and the amount of parking. J21 . General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal will be "consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity." Be specific with examples of consistency. How is this project "consistent with Island Estates?" How is this proposal consistent with the proposed project to the north? Provide specific examples. 122 . General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal design "minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties." Design of the building will not increase "visibility through the site to the water." Side setbacks to the existing building are within inches of the proposed side setbacks, which will not significantly increase views toward the water. Unclear as to what is intended with "no spillage over into other properties or the right-of-way," as to whether this is landscaping or retention. J 23 . Based on the submitted survey and the "existing ISR" of 0.97 stated in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1, provide the calculations used to derive 0.97 ISR. Looking at the survey and the proposed site plan, the ISR is much closer together than 0.97 existing versus 0.81 proposed. Due to the above, also ensure that any statements in the responses to any of the criteria are correct as to the amount of open space being provided. 24 . Residential Infill Project criteria #6 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal "is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards." Why can't minimum standard setbacks, height, etc. be met. Give specific responses to each reduction/increase requested. J 25 . Residential Infill Project criteria #4 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal is "compatible with adjacent land uses." Be specific to the adjacent land uses. Unclear of meaning of second sentence relating to incompatibility. 26 . Residential Infill Project criteria #5 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this redevelopment proposal "will upgrade the immediate vicinity." Also, do you mean other surrounding projects built in the 60's, not the 20's. J27 . Residential Infill Project criteria #6 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this redevelopment proposal "creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Be specific as to the characteristics of the developments in the immediate vicinity. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 54 128 . Residential Infill Project criteria #7 - Provide a detailed justification as to how flexibility for this redevelopment proposal "in regard to lot width, required setbacks and height are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Be specific to each part of the request and, especially, its relationship to the immediate vicinity. f 29 . Unclear why with the application two responses to Residential Infill Project criteria have been submitted. If needs be and appropriate, combine the two responses. h O . With the resubmittal of packets for the CDB, provide one packet to Planning that is signed and sealed by the engineer of record. All other packets may be copies of this signed and sealed version. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 8/16/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 7/7/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 55 Case Number: FLD2005-05045 -- 405 ISLAND WAY 2:55 pm Owner(s): Ronald E Kozan 40 PMA 23 Camelot Dr Oak Brook, 1160523 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Newkirk Ventures, Inc. 9309 N Florida Avenue #104 Tampa, FI 33612 TELEPHONE: 813-936-2221, FAX: 813-936-2228, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Housh Ghovaee 460306001 prMt CN14611t4"hi 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727446-8036, E-MAIL: nestech@mindspring.com Location: 0.676 acres located on the east side of Island Way, approximately 300 feet south of Skiff Point. Atlas Page: 267B Zoning District: IEOD, Island Estates Neighborhood Overlay District Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (26 existing and proposed attached dwelling units; 20 dwelling units maximum under land use category), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 26 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 feet to 144.65 feet, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 23 feet (to balcony), from 25 feet to 14 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 5.7 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 5.7 feet (to balconies) and from 10 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet (to balconies) and an increase to building height from 30 feet to xx feet (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 12 feet (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-404.F, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Island Estates Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 140 Island Way #239 TELEPHONE: 442-2237, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Dolphin Cove Condo Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 255 Dolphin Point TELEPHONE: 727-442-7880, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: dlphincovel@netzero.com Neighborhood Village On Island Estates Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 240 Windward Passage Unit 803 TELEPHONE: 727-461-3861, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: narctom@msn.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: Staff. Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Blackburn Applicant: Housh Ghovaee, Doreen Williams The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 51 The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727)562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the water meter and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 3. The condominium plat for this project shall be recorded prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Environmental: 1. 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Fire: 1. This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Review and approval by th authority having jurisdiction shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. 2. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 3. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet to the front and sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please respond to this commet PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet to the front, sides and rear of the FDC are required to be maintained. Please respond to this comment PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: I . Landscape Plan Sheet L1.1 does not indicate the required or provided landscape buffering. Revise. Based on the submittal, the following reductions are apparent: a reduction to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 feet to 5.8 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 feet to five feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Unclear as to interior landscape area provided. 2. Vehicular use area exceeds 4,000 square feet and parking provided is greater than 110% of the required parking. Per Section 3-1202.E.1 Code requires a minimum of 12% of vehicular use area. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10 parking spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft., and be 8 feet wide (back of curb to back of curb). 3 . Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas. 4. Plan does not meet the requirements of perimeter plantings in Code Section 3-1202.1) for the front buffer along Island Way. Revise. 5 . Relocate the fire line to the rear fire riser closer to the building to provide adequate planting area and depth to minimize conflicts with landscaping. 6. Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria #lb - Provide a detailed response as to how the "design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards." Important words are "demonstrably more attractive" than "minimum landscape standards." Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 52 Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues, based on termination of 26 units being replaced with reconstruction of 26 units. If number of new units changes fees may be due. Stormwater: 1 . 1. See Environmental Condition. Solid Waste: I . How will recycling be handled and staged Traffic Engineering: 1 , 1. Vertical clearance height for drop off area must be a minimum of 114 inches. 2. Design shear wall at parking spaces to allow sight visibility for motorists backing out. 3. Provide one-way and do not enter signage for better internal vehicular circulation. 4. Provide white pavement directional arrows to enhance internal vehicular circulation. 5. Columns must not encroach in the parking stalls i.e. columns that are located behind wheel stops may be hit. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118) General note: The Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy (Ordinance No. 86-43, Section 150) Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 53 1 . Revise lot area acreage on Sheet C1.1 from 0.68 acre to 0.676 acre.. 2. Based on the Typical Floor Layout on Sheet A-1 and the site plan on Sheet C2.1, and input from a Building Plans Examiner in the Development Services Department, the exit stairs will not meet Building Code requirements, in that egress directs people back into the parking garage level and not to the outside. Especially apparent with the stairs on the south side, there is no means to access to the sidewalk to the sidewalk in the R.O.W. Revise. 3. Provide building dimensions on the site plan Sheet C2.1. 4. Since there is no demolition plan submitted and it isn't shown on the site plan on Sheet C2.1, it is assumed that the existing dock will be removed as part of the proposal. If this is incorrect, please revise Sheet C2.1 to show the existing dock and access to the dock. 5 . Potential condition to be included in Staff Report: That prior to the issuance of any permits a Unity of Title be recorded, with a copy of the recorded document provided to the Planning Department; 6. Indicate on Sheets EL-1 and EL-2 what areas of the building facade will be painted the colors indicated in the Color Schedule. 7. 6/8/05 - WW Revise Sheet A-3 to indicate this as floor level 5 (not 4). 6/1/05 - WW Based on the front elevation on Sheet EL-1, the top floor is not "typical" as indicated on Sheet A-1. Provide a floor layout for the top floor. 8. No pool or recreation facilities proposed? 9. Based on the typical floor layout on Sheet A-1 and the elevations on Sheets EL-1 and EL-2, the windows indicated on the north and south sides of the end Unit C's and on the north and south sides of Units A are not shown on the typical floor layout. Additionally, the windows indicated on the west side of Unit A on the elevations are not shown on the typical floor layout, and the doors and balcony are different for Unit A's. Revise. 10. Provide the "proposed density" (units per acre) in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1. 11 . Explain the need for the curved "drop-off' lane in front. Recommend removal. 12. Recommend providing two parking spaces per unit. 13. Cantilevered balconies exceed the maximum 50% of the width of the building to which they are attached and exceed a maximum of two feet into the required rear setback of 15 feet. Provide detailed justification as to how these balconies, at a proposed 10-foot rear setback, "will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties," how this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards" and how "flexibility in regard to the required setback is justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." The adjacent property to the north is proposed (designed by same engineering firm as this proposal) at a minimum rear setback of 21.1 feet to the building (including balconies) and the existing building to the south is set back approximately 25 feet from the rear property line. Staff cannot support the requested encroachment and will recommend meeting the required rear setback of 15 feet to the edge of the balconies. This non-support is due in part to the requested Termination of Nonconforming density, as the site design promotes an overbuilding of the site. Further, will not support a movement of the entire project westward to increase the amount of encroachment into the front setback. 14. Based on the front elevation on Sheet EL-1 which portrays an indentation in the center of the north and south building wings through shading, yet the floor plans on Sheets A-1, A-2 and A-3 don't show such articulation of the facade. This articulation helps break up the facade plane. 15. Parapet above the flat roof deck for the rear portion of the building is 11.67 feet. Unclear why this height of the parapet is necessary, as it appears excessive. Code provides a maximum of 30-inches. A taller parapet (greater than Code maximum) may be appropriate to screen rooftop mechanical equipment and to provide proportion to the building. Is there something happening on this roof that Staff needs to be aware of in relation to the height of the parapet? Provide a complete justification for the proposed parapet height or reduce its height. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 54 16. Provide detailed responses to the following requirements of the Tertion of Status of Nonconformity for density, including all justification (Section 6-109.C): 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(D). 3. Any nonconforn ing sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 17. General Applicability criteria #1 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal "will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties." Provide examples of other adjacent properties as to their height, density, etc. as to how this project relates. 18. General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal "will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof." It is noted that the "multiple buildings on the site instead of one tall building" will not provide "more ope view to the water" due to the total building's design. Address impact on value of adjacent land and buildings. 19. General Applicability criteria #3 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal "will not adversely affect the health or safety of person residing or working in the neighborhood." Give specific examples of negative and positive effects of this proposal to the surrounding "neighborhood." 20. General Applicability criteria #4 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal will "minimize traffic congestion." Address existing conditions of parking, including the location and number of driveways, and how this proposal will be an improvement over the existing condition, including the location and number of driveways and the amount of parking. 21 . General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal will be "consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity." Be specific with examples of consistency. How is this project "consistent with Island Estates?" How is this proposal consistent with the proposed project to the north? Provide specific examples. 22. General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal design "minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties." Design of the building will not increase "visibility through the site to the water." Side setbacks to the existing building are within inches of the proposed side setbacks, which will not significantly increase views toward the water. Unclear as to what is intended with "no spillage over into other properties or the right-of-way," as to whether this is landscaping or retention. 23 . Based on the submitted survey and the "existing ISR" of 0.97 stated in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1, provide the calculations used to derive 0.97 ISR. Looking at the survey and the proposed site plan, the ISR is much closer together than 0.97 existing versus 0.81 proposed. Due to the above, also ensure that any statements in the responses to any of the criteria are correct as to the amount of open space being provided. 24. Residential Infill Project criteria #6 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal "is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards." Why can't minimum standard setbacks, height, etc. be met. Give specific responses to each reduction/increase requested. 25 . Residential Infill Project criteria #4 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this proposal is "compatible with adjacent land uses." Be specific to the adjacent land uses. Unclear of meaning of second sentence relating to incompatibility. 26. Residential Infill Project criteria #5 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this redevelopment proposal "will upgrade the immediate vicinity." Also, do you mean other surrounding projects built in the 60's, not the 20's. 27. Residential Infill Project criteria #6 - Provide a detailed justification as to how this redevelopment proposal "creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Be specific as to the characteristics of the developments in the immediate vicinity. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 55 28 . Residential Infill Project criteria #7 - Provide a detailed justification alto how flexibility for this redevelopment proposal "in regard to lot width, required setbacks and height are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Be specific to each part of the request and, especially, its relationship to the immediate vicinity. 29. Unclear why with the application two responses to Residential Infill Project criteria have been submitted. If needs be and appropriate, combine the two responses. 30. With the resubmittal of packets for the CDB, provide one packet to Planning that is signed and sealed by the engineer of record. All other packets may be copies of this signed and sealed version. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 8/16/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 7/7/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 30, 2005 - Page 56 Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. r[Vj0D,5- 0!?D K Meeting Date: /10/c Location: 14 C f) /,&'- Current Use: Active Code Enforcement Cas (no) yes: Address number yeses no) (vacant land) ,,a _ Landscapin 'yes (no) ,.a- Overgrown (yes) (ho Debris (yes) ( 0 "Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes Vno) ding(s) (fair) vacant land) Buil u Fencing (none) ,(good}dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) Paintoo (fair) (poor) (garish) .®- Grass Parking (yes) 'no) ,zr- Residential Parking Violations (yes) (no ,-'Signage,,`none) ok) (not ok) (billboard) ?-°.."Parking (n/a? stripe (handicapped) (needs repaving) -- Dumpster (enclosed) ( enclos94? fr- Outdoor storage (yesy(no Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date:01-1? 05" Reviewed by: S Telephone: SU )- W) c2?_ Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 4:43 PM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 405 Island Way Sam - Attached is a map request for Cases FLD2005-03027 for the property at 415 Island Way. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne FLD Map request form 6.17.05.d... A DznnP• DSO 4i' 4es 'C <<11h, A I_ I& 258 A 2588 ?y9 6 7 "6 5 4 'too CITY OF CLEARVY ER Ic 5i 61 A" TY PUWAAS COUNTt Y F M 2 M Y . LO DA Irl 'Ip + e PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 62 I. NCCINEE"`C IW S Yyrik ., Cw i«. F[ 33156 le&all'UlIdc" CO % 45 h, 44 63 IG (813)562-4750. For (813)526-4755 hi,p://www.<Iwr?ol«-fl.tom/snq?eer/ n?, ' ?? H?•?wla f• rf ? r rt ?{) t9i?? 1;•} u? Q 1 4 ..y. C n 4'„',A^I? e'b Ifyl Iy Y 64 116 Difdolmer: ,?fq 36 38: 40 ? ? _ {?.(n _' //, 15 C0? - <7 If< 43 M' /f6 W 65 419 Pu01k W-11- 0M. if Nrnlfned by the City of Clwrwal<r PUNIC Work. AdmYrl.ir0tkn/En91 vw, k and fi be pcceptpd 9. mu r fy 42 . and uf<d by Ne r NDI<nt with ,he underftondh9 lhoi the doto recthed wof dk l d r t 6 1 a a ff ?(f "7 Q a ' 4•i ~ IB It. Off 66 40 c t e w he DurpOfe of devetopi+9 o W,phit In lraft',cj- h-twy. AS wch, the City of Cieorwcler pWA/E m k It V 3 It p 33 /7N 49 61 Ift 41f a e. n0 wpll.i...«f or Impllyd. COntem Able ln ty, c dMMef. s. liff rNlobiliiy, o wltobNlty of thk dojo [w w ; SS'pp • 1 S' 1f0 Ey? 4 11 r N 40 67 - pny .1n0 p ufe. Furtn«mc <, In< City cr wilh i« PWA/E o. 2 - no Ik6Nliy whaiforrer offodoied wllh the use l ((! 111 •Y' t9 # 4 S 0 10. IOf 39 68 r fe W m w o[ -h dol.. n $`' IpO 4?' '0i1 ?a Lf N P ?O'T F?ji^ G toM 1 IS ?/ To 51 Ito 101 69 op 52 i Thk A11o> page k wbbk l to p<rlodk cnongef. For W-41- about I"I revlfionf X- rail PWA/E w .,.it our web iVe . yx s 1 ~ i 1 Lp 1 SAY COlz f G 3 7 7 N C C,py?y + , ' e N53... to ,7 ?? ,,ry ?' 6 Ew, ... co i1 r 54 f[. ftf 36 a a 4j _WY o T, 22 1 4p1 12101 SAY 'A 55j" +rf 35 /s ^ •• S / S to `9 CONDO. 11..47 0 34 d56 0 100 2D0 400 600 .? it ?fy Q 7 9 8 41 1" 1n PVXO ?oNTT < 0-93 , pp 57 f 33 . SCALE: I" : 400- <+ Q 0 DOLPHIN COVE CTt S?7 11 fro r.Y. fpp 6of ? f CONDO \ k ` O ~ t?t?" 9 p 581w Gf 32 LEGEND: C 20-58 G + i 31 ( OOAY PASSAGE ?Q? C1 1 G 1+1 r Y 59 e'3 i+1 tG Q 0B 1 G . Gi . tt P N n 60 30 O B BLOCK NUMBER Efl N > 13/01 t a0 ? l rr6 4 A 7 X tr. od 61 a 29 N En 00 1234 LOT ADDRESS +b 9 ? •Ty ati..1 „ Y + I in rs D T ----- L 62 TB IMI S LINE • t }0r P-l SHADED AREA PROPERTY .9 4t ` i •1 ................_( 1 'a a 63top sor 27 OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS } 5 ye a 13/02 7 4f Q ,6y .g F....tY t._• 3/ ue {r ,;,? of ST. BRENDAN ---? , ? • e 6 ? s 64 no T8 rn GREEMENT TO ANNEX r CATHOLIC ?: .7n° P ° t y , ^85 25 yt p, 0? CHURCH ! I !'' '? r l 'r rrr m 4 CITY OWNED PROPERTY 3 r t. i ? .P rsi 66 24 i ? 'r. rr. MDR ZONING DESIGNATION y .4 '9 L 4 ,'I?` 13/05 frd rra er rr+ ZONE LINE BB 22 dA 9 13/04 t Ea] 'y O rob 3/ ° d° i 6 N*[mw[ ,4 9 1# S rro V 70 4 89 20 21 nEEa[ ono f (j 6 ?' \' .pas es+f-n. a ?' f WINDWARD 'J . B g D R Y roo PASSA ro[ Q (D rite 01/,5/v e/oy l ® v is µ am-34 , 7 ? 3/07 /4r GE $ /e .' [ H .' ' A / 5 / 3 rp C 2 1 $` 1 2 ? t t8 t9 m a d? 3 p/ tri ?i0 3 .e „ 17 j ' ?y` t7 fRQ/>`fltQiLQ/M1 f ti 0 " V 5 ar . ,eg ' q b ? a to 1fo p ,r 'S p . RMO)v 6 we 14 °ayy ?np ° CO OP U 7 it REVISED. y? M jIRyc m so a 13 03/Q8/49 6 rr 0-1 ZONING ATLAS 276A ? 2768 SECTION E 1/4 267 277A s 5 S 8 10 7 Division of Corporations 0 9 Page 1 of 2 t It' ,.. ?. r. 71 4w Florida Profit Document Number P03000112136 State FL NEWKIRK VENTURES, INC. PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 5101 W. NEPTUNE WAY TAMPA FL 33609 MAILING ADDRESS 5101 W. NEPTUNE WAY TAMPA FL 33609 FEI Number 582678607 Date Filed 10/10/2003 Status ACTIVE Reizistered Name & Address NEWKIRK, MARK E 5101 W. NEPTUNE WAY TAMPA FL 33609 Officer/Director Detail Effective Date 10/05/2003 Titl dd & e ress Name A NEWKIRK, MARK E l 5101 W. NEPTUNE WAY El TAMPA FL 33609 Annual Report Year Filed Date 2004 04/22/2004 http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n 1=PO3000112136&n2=NAMF W... 5/31/2005 Division of Corporations . 0 Previous Filing ' Return to List Next Filing No Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. Page 2 of 2 04/22/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT 10/10/2003 -- Domestic Profit THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry Corporations Help http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al =DETFIL&n 1=PO3000112136&n2=NAMFW... 5/31/2005 ,Pinellas County Property Appv Information: 08 29 15 43326 000 06 Page 2 of 5 08 / 29 / 15 / 43320 / 000 / 0150 31-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:04:39 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales KOZAN, RONALD E OBK: 10367 OPG: 0456 KOZAN, KAREN L 23 CAMELOT DR OAK BROOK IL 60523-1733 EVACUATION ZONE: A Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 405 ISL AND WAY of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.01 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 12/1,998 10,367/ 456 1,250,000 (Q) I 1958: Book 047 Pgs 19A-020 10/1,992 8,047/ 786 1,050,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,972 3,841/ 392 410,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { ) 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 1,450,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 1,450,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1,450,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater view: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 33,305.63 1) 147 x 200 75.00 29,400.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 33, 305.63 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 33, 305.63 Short Legal ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATE R UNIT 2 Description LOT 15 & S 1/2 OF LOT 16 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 5/31/2005 Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 08 29 15 43326 000 06 Page 3 of 5 Prot)erty._and_Land _Use.Code descriptions 08 29 / 15 43320 / 000 l 0150 :01 31-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:04:43 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Mult Res Apt <4 St Property Address: 405 ISLAND WAY Prop Use: 311 Land Use: 03 STru+ctural E1sm4Bnts Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Gable & Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 26 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 82 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,962 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 8,460 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 4,824 8) .00 0 3) Upper Stry Base Area .90 8,460 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 +Commsrczal Extra Futures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 4600 1.50 4,600 6,900 61900 999 2) CARPORT 17X130 10.00 21210 22,100 8,840 1,962 3) PATIO/DECK 450SF 3.00 450 1,350 540 1,972 4) POOL 20X40 25,000.00 1 25,000 10,000 1,972 5) DOCK 728SF 20.00 728 14,560 5,820 1,972 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 32,100 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F +_1 R [ _t] 41 RI RI http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 5/31/2005 _ r Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 08 29 15 43326 000 0 r t 298 PT Page 4 of 5 LFMRD ISL 424 LEEV?RD IL LE SQL I LEA I- (,ID L 332? Ibl i? (r, I I 3 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 5/31/2005 Pinellas County Property AppOer Information: 08 29 15 43326 000 06 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back _to..Search-Rage An explanation of this screen http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 5/31/2005 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, August 16, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: _NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Copt from 07-19-05) Home Energy, LLC. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 144.63 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 feet (to patios) and from 10 ft to 8 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 43.17 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 5.5 ft (from roof deck) and an additional 13.67 ft for an open rooftop pavilion (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.17, with reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 8 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape . buffer along the south side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [4 townhomes and 16 condominiums]) at 415 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 17 and part of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-04035 2. (Cont from 07-19-05) Beach & Gulf Sands, Inc., & North Clearwater Beach Development (Anthony Menna) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings in the Tourist District and an increase in ht from 35 ft to 64 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches, permit 2 parking spaces within the required sight visibility triangles along Bay Esplanade, a reduction in the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and 3 ft (to trash staging area), reduction in the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), 10 ft (to pool) and 7 ft (to building), reduction in the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 feet (to trash staging area) and a reduction the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 8 ft (to pool) and 10 ft (to building), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C., Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03019) of 2 dwelling units from 116 Brightwater Dr (donor site) to 657 Bay Esplanade (receiver site) under the provisions of Sec's 4- 1402 and 4-1403 and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity under the provisions of Sec 6-109. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [13 condominium units]) at 657 & 663 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-03032/TDR2005-03019 3. Religious Community Services, Inc. (The Haven of RCS) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a white PVC fence 6 ft in ht within the front (east) setback along North Saturn Ave without substantial grill work and masonry columns and without a 3 foot wide 0 0 landscape strip on the street side of the fence as otherwise required by Sec's 3-804.A.I and 3 on a property within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) district, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-304.G. (Proposed Use: Community Residential Homes) at 1520 N Saturn Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 44.01. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05038 4. Ardent International Ltd Liability Co, Panayiotis Vasiloudes, and Helen Vasiloudes (M313 Development, LLC/Robert Szasz) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings in the Tourist District, an increase in ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches and a reduction the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft to pool deck and 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade and 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 1-3. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 5. TSE TSE, LLC (M313 Development, LLC/Robert Szasz) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings in the Tourist District, an increase in ht from 35 ft to 58 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches and a reduction the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 3.33 ft to pool deck and 6 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 629, 635 & 637 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 78, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05044 6. First Baptist Church of Clearwater (Opus South Corporation, Opus South Contractor's LLC/John Franklin Wade) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow a mixed-use development of 157 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 31 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 10,022 sq ft of non-residential use, with an.increase to the permitted ht from 30 ft to 271 ft (to roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments and mechanical equipment (from roof deck), to reduce the non-residential parking requirement from 41 parking spaces to zero (0) parking spaces, and to allow a building within the required sight visibility triangle at the intersection of Cleveland St and North Osceola Ave, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C., and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along N Osceola Ave, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Mixed-use [169 attached dwellings and 10,022 sq ft non- residential floor area]) at 331 Cleveland St, John R Davey's Resub Blk A, Part of Lots 1-3 & unplatted parcel. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05048 7. Clearwater Land Ltd (Druid Courtyard Clearwater, LLC/Nicholas F Ferraioli) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 47 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to entry feature columns) and from 25 ft to 18.5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 4 ft (to entry feature columns) and from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement and pool deck), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to entry feature column), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 1.9 ft (to entry feature column) and an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 55 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets, under the provisions of Sec 2-504.A. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [47 condominiums]) at 1105 Druid Rd, Sec 15-29-15, M&B 34.03. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP. FLD2005-05037 0 8. Religious Community Services, Inc. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing social/public service agency with a reduction to tot width from 100 ft to 58 tt (along Myrtle Ave), a reduction to the front (south along Druid Rd) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Ave) setback from 25 ft to 15 tt (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.0, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Rd (south) from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.4 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Expansion and renovation of the RCS food bank) at 700 Druid Rd, Magnolia Park, Blk 26, Lots 9 & 10 & parts of Lots 1-5 & 8. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner 111. FLD2005-05046 9. Ronald and Karen Kozan (Newkirk Ventures, Inc.) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (26 existing and proposed attached dwelling units; 20 dwelling units maximum under land use category), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 26 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 144.65 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to building) from 25 ft to 20 ft (to balcony), from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 It to 6.1 ft (to balconies) and from 10 ft to 5.4 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from t0 ft to 6.1 ft (to balconies) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building height from 30 ft to 46 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 6 ft (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F, and reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to 5.4 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [26 condominiums]) at 405 Island Way,_Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 15 and part of Lot 16. Assigned Play i YVa lm.-'Wellg,' h ner I D2005-05045 10. Camille Courtney & Elina Honicky (Henry C. Kyle, III & Robert Elder) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow an addition to an existing single-family residence with a reduction to the front setback from 25 ft to 20.3 ft (to building), under the provisions of Sec 2- 304.G. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 1415 San Juan Court, Blvd Heights, Blk K, Lot 17 and part of Lot 18. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-05052 11. DiVello Land Trust, Fulvio DiVello "Trustee (Maddalina DiVello & 1loush Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (111 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 83 dwelling units), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 83 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south along S. Gulfvicw Blvd.) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (west along Hamden Dr) from 15 ft to 12.5 ft (to building and proposed pavement), from 15 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) from 10 ft to 3 ft (to existing pavement) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter 0 0 parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22.5 ft for elevator and stair towers (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.0. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [83 condominiums]) at 445 Hamden Dr and 504 S Gulfview Blvd, Columbia Sub No. 5, Lots 4-11, and RIP rts and land adj to Lot 11. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05051 12. TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC (E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 112 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units, 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 sq ft of retail sales with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 6 ft (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 ft to 4 It (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 8 ft from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 ft 100 ft for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 ft to 150 ft for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 ft to 90 ft and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of 4 dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Ave, 2 dwelling units from 625-627 Bay Esplanade, 2 dwelling units from 665 Bay Esplanade and 3 dwelling units • from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Mixed use of 112 attached dwellings [condominiums], 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 sq ft of retail sales) at 430 South Gulfview Blvd Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub, Lots 33-35, part of Lot 36 and subm land on W. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005-05022 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entities parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. v 11 Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 07/31/05 FLD2005-0504.5 = 361 333 ISLAND WAY CONDO ASSN 333 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2173 ABREU, JOAQUIN ABREU, SILVIA 320 ISLAND WAY # 503 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 ALEXIOU, NICHOLAS G ALEXIOU, ANTHIE 400 ISLAND WAY # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 ALLEN, C STEVEN ALLEN, ROBIN S 270 SKIFF PT # A-3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2161 ARMSTRONG, ELIZABETH D 58 A DRAYTON GARDEN LONDON SW109SB 00003 - GREAT BRITAIN BAGLEY, ANNE M 333 ISLAND WAY # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2130 BARNES, WALTER E BARNES, ANITA C 2415 BALTIC AVE VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23451 - 3268 BARRY, KEVIN P BARRY, DORISANN P 400 ISLAND WAY # 1012 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - BAYES, FRANCES BAYES, JAMES M 270 SKIFF PT # A-5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2161 876164 ONTARIO INC 8 BOWES CT BOLTON ON L7E 1A4 00030 - CANADA AFRIAT, NATHALY ARFIAT, GELMIRES 320 ISLAND WAY # 6-602 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2179 ALEXIOU, VICKI 400 ISLAND WAY # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 ANDERSEN, STEVE L 325 ISLAND WAY # 105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2167 ARMSTRONG, MARGARET G 400 ISLAND WAY # 811 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 BAISLEY, JOHN J 23 CHANNINGVILLE RD WAPPINGERS NY 12590 - 2305 BARR, GERALD R BARR, SHARON R 2708 SLATEN PARK CIR SIOUX FALLS SD 57103 - BAXTER, ROGER L 400 LARBOARD WAY # 104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2149 BEADLE, JAMES E BEADLE, JACQUELINE J PO BOX 381 AUGUSTA MI 49012 - 0381 ABDEL-MALAK, FAHMY ABDEL-MALAK, WEDAD 4076 WELLINGTON PKWY PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 1174 ALBERTERNST,KLAUS ALBERTERNST,URSULA 400 LARBOARD WAY # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2188 ALEXOPOULOS, ANGELA 400 ISLAND WAY # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 ANDRIANI, LEONARDO CURRY, MARY E 312 LEEWARD ISL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2307 BAGAN, LAURENCE J BAGAN, ROSEMARY C 400 ISLAND WAY # 301 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 BARNES, MARIA S 1995 BELLEAIR RD CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2536 BARR, THOMAS J 9 RUTGERS DR DELRAN NJ 08075 - 1609 BAY ISLAND CONDO ASSN 311 ISLAND WAY # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2128 BEALE, THERESA M 298 SKIFF PT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2178 BECKER, RUSSELL W BENOS, DINO J BESTENLEHNER, FRANCIS G 311 ISLAND WAY # 201 KENOS, GLADYS G REILLY, CAROL B CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2128 400 ISLAND WAY # 605 400 ISLAND WAY # 1401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 SHAME, WILLIAM N THE BHASIN, PAUL G BINDER, IRENE G THE BINDER, RALPH H THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 1411 320 ISLAND WAY # 306 320 ISLAND WAY # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2180 BINGLEY, LEO J JR BITCHAKAS, NORA J BLANCO, TONY BINGLEY, JUANITA L 400 E MILL ST PO BOX 190540 325 ISLAND WAY # 110 PORT ALLEGANY PA 33767 - 2132 SAN JUAN PR 00919 - 0540 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2167 BLANKENBURG, IRENE BLUESTONE, SEYMOUR S BOCTOR, IBRAHIM 400 ISLAND WAY # 309 400 ISLAND WAY # 1609 BOCTOR, MARY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2131 400 ISLAND WAY # 1410 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 BODAN, EILEEN BONFIGLIO, ANTHONY D BOUFFARD, PAUL E 400 ISLAND WAY # 501 320 ISLAND WAY # 501 BOUFFARD, WENDY L CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 421 PALM IS SE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2147 BRICE, TRACY BRUNNER, JOHN R BRUNO, SALVATORE J 400 ISLAND WAY # 1006 BRUNNER, PATRICE A BRUNO, VIOLA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 400 ISLAND WAY # 1512 400 ISLAND WAY # 910 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 BUCCINA, JOSEPH B THE BUCCINA, ROSE M BURNETT, CHARLES 400 ISLAND WAY # 601 BUCCINA, JOAN B BURNETT, GERALDINE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 400 ISLAND WAY # 907 320 ISLAND WAY # 5-509 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2179 BUSCHNER, KENNETH P BUSTARD, ROBERT G CARDULLIAS, PETER J II BUSCHNER, MICHELLE B SEYFARTH, EILEEN C 2685 SOUTH RD 64 HIDDEN RIDGE TRL 1239 CASTLE HILL AVE CINCINNATI OH 45233 - 4314 HONEOYE FALLS NY 14472 - 9378 BRONX NY 10462 - 4813 CARLIN, MARGARET CARLSON, CAROL M CARRERA, CYNTHIA L 40 FAHY AVE 400 ISLAND WAY # 405 CARRERA, SALVATORE M JR EST STATEN ISLAND NY 10314 - 7201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 348 LARBOARD WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2147 CARROLL, BARBARA L CASALE, PETER M CASE, WALTER A 400 ISLAND WAY # 201 CASALE, ROSE CASE, NANCY K CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 37 ASHFORD DR 400 ISLAND WAY # 908 BOHEMIA NY 11716 - 3960 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 CASEY, THOMAS J THE CHACONAS, NICK CHAMBERLAND, RUTH S CASEY, VERONICA THE CHACONAS, STEPHANIE 320 ISLAND WAY # 606 19362 COFFINBERRY BLVD 400 LARBOARD WAY # 106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 FAIRVIEW PARK OH 44126 - 1610 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2150 CHAUNDY, THOMAS M CINELLI, DAVID CHAUNDY, SHANNON L CHRONE, MAURICE CINELLI, RICCARDO 301 ISLAND WAY # H 1541 RAHWAY RD 2975 DE BLOIS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2164 SCOTCH PLAINS NJ 07076 - 2730 DUVERNAY LAVAL PQ WE 5G6 00030 - CANADA CLARK, ROBERT K CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS CLINE, AUSTIN L JR CLARK, TERESA C COALITION CLINE, GENIEVEVE J 320 ISLAND WAY # 603 DOUG WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT 400 LARBOARD WAY # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2188 CLEARWATER, FL 33761 CLIPPER COVE & CUTTER COVE COLBERT, ROBERT L COLE, ALLEN CON COLE, SHELLA 3 YEARDLEYS GRANT 600 BYPASS DR STE 215 WILLIAMSBURG VA 23185 - 6529 252 DOLPHIN PT CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5075 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - COPELAND, ALVIN C COTHALIS, KOSTAS COTTINGHAM, CAROLE COTHALIS, ELENI 1405 AIRLINES DR 320 ISLAND WAY # 106 METAIRIE LA 70001 - 5901 400 ISLAND WAY # 412 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2180 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 COYLE, LORRAINE A CURRAN, MYRTLE S CURRENT OWNER 320 ISLAND WAY # 604 400 ISLAND WAY # 507 320 ISLAND WAY # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2180 CURRENT OWNER CUTTER COVE CONDO HMOWNS CUZZOLINO, JOHN 400 LEEWARD ISL ASSN CUZZOLINO, CONCETTA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2309 600 BYPASS DR 98 MURRAY HILL TER CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5078 MARLBORO NJ 07746 - 1751 CZAICKI, EDWARD DAME, FRANK L DANA, MARCOS CZAICKI, BOZENA DAME, LYNN M 400 ISLAND WAY # 1510 333 ISLAND WAY # 202 407 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2183 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2310 DANA, MAYER DANA, MAYER DARGO, DAVID R 702 PONCE DE LEON BLVD DANA, LILY DARGO, BETTY C CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 702 PONCE DE LEON BLVD 301 ISLAND WAY # A BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1004 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2164 DE COSTER, MICHELLE G DE VITO, CARMINE M DEARBORN, CITY OF 832 GRAND MARAIS DE VITO, ELIZABETH DEARBORN HOUSING BUREAU GROSSE POINTE PARK MI 48230 - 400 ISLAND WAY # 104 13615 MICHIGAN AVE 1847 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 DEARBORN MI 48126 - 3545 DEVOL, KENNETH L DI VELLO, MADDALENA LIVING TRU DIVINE, LAWRENCE H THE DEVOL, JOANNE C DI VELLO, MADDALENA THE DIVINE, DIANA M THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 209 400 ISLAND WAY # 703 400 LARBOARD WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2187 DOBSON, REGINALD J DOLPHIN COVE CONDO DOLPHIN'S LANDING HMOWNS DOBSON, LEE ASSOCIATION ASSN 313 WALDEGRAVE RD 255 DOLPHIN POINT 372 LARBOARD WAY TWKKENHAM, LONDON TW1 4SLI 00003 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2147 GREAT BRITAIN DRINKWATER, DOROTHY J TRUST DRUMMOND, JAMES A DURSHORDWE, WILLIAM 324 MIDWAY IS DRUMMOND, SANDRA K 51 ISLAND WAY APT 610 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2317 625 HIDDEN LN GROSSE POINTE WOODS MI 48236 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2214 1520 DUTCHER, JAMES A JR. THE EDMUNDS, CAROLE A ERRINGTON, RONALD E DUTCHER, SHERYL H THE 311 ISLAND WAY # 104 415 LEEWARD IS 360 LARBOARD WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2127 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2310 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2147 ETCELL, GEORGE J 400 ISLAND WAY # 802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 FAKLIS, NICK V FAKLIS, ANN A 331 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2308 FIFFY, JAMES FIFFY, JOANNA 400 ISLAND WAY # 1108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 FORD, CLARENCE H FORD, VIRGINIA R 400 ISLAND WAY # 810 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 FRANGOS, GEORGE PONIROS, MARIA THE 590 WASHINGTON AVE WASHINGTON TWP NJ 07676 - 4317 FREITAG, HERBERT FREITAG, LORRAINE 829 NARCISSUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - FRY, DOUGLAS E THE 311 ISLAND WAY # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2128 F A J E INC F PC CORP 33 ROSELAWN CRE 355 HOLLOW HILL DR MONT ROYAL PQ H3P 1 H8 00030 - WAUCONDA IL 60084 - 9794 CANADA FARHAT, ANDRE J FERRIELL, SUSAN G FARHAT, BRIDGET A 301 ISLAND WAY # C 14 HARBOR HEIGHTS RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2164 SCITUATE MA 02066 - 1320 FITZPATRICK, THOMAS L FOLEY, THOMAS J FITZPATRICK, JUNE H FOLEY, MARQUERITE 3523 EASTERN AVE 27 RIDGEWOOD RD DAVENPORT IA 52807 - 2025 WORCESTER MA 01606 - 2506 FOUAD, MOHAMED H FRANGO, PETER E MOHAMED, NADIA FRANGO, MARY 400 ISLAND WAY # 905 17377 SUMMIT DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 NORTHVILLE MI 48167 - 3203 FRARY, TIMOTHY E FREDRICK, DAVID W LAPPIN-FRARY, BERNADETTE FREDRICK, MERRY L 400 ISLAND WAY # 1404 1105 GATEWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 WAVERLY IA 50677 - 1462 FRISQUE, ALVIN J THE FRITZ, ALBERT C 11 129 ACACIA CIR # 502E 20834 WATERSCAPE WAY INDIAN HEAD PARK IL 60525 - 9057 NOBLESVILLE IN 46062 - 8368 FRY, MICHAEL P GADDIS, SUSAN L FRY, DOUGLAS E 298 SKIFF PT # 301 311 ISLAND WAY # 103 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2127 0 GARRETT, KEN GATES, JEAN H THE GED, HELEN E GARRETT, DARLENE 270 SKIFF PT # B-1 400 ISLAND WAY # 1203 64600 SR 331 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2160 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 BREMEN IN 46506 - GEORGE-EDDLEMAN, CLARE GERLACH, ROBERT W GIAVARAS, STAVROS 320 ISLAND WAY # 104 GERLACH, NANCY L GIAVARAS, MARY K CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2180 400 LARBOARD WAY # 208 400 ISLAND WAY # 411 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2187 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 GITTELMAN, LEON GLENNON, VICTORIA L THE GODELAS, SAM T THE GITTELMAN, ELIZABETH 117 S CHICAGO ST 621 ROSE DR 400 ISLAND WAY # 1607 PONTIAC IL 61764 - MELROSE PARK IL 60160 - 2310 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2131 GONSKE, EDWIN G GRANIERI, JOYCE GROSSMAN, PETER M GONSKE, ELTA J 354 LARBOARD WAY 400 ISLAND WAY # 102 400 ISLAND WAY # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2147 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 GUNTHER, ROBERT C HACKING, G EDWARD HALIABALIS, CHRISTOS GUNTHER, JANE HACKING, SALLY S HALIABALIS, MARY 800 S OSPREY AVE 440 ISLAND WAY 37 WEST CEDARVIEW AVE SARASOTA FL 34236 - 7834 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2100 STATEN ISLAND NY 10306 - 1721 HARMS, GREGORY HARNARAYAN, SASTRI HARRIS, STACY B 25950 PALOMITA DR 400 ISLAND WAY # 407 MEADOWS, ROBIN B VALENCIA CA 91355 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 22835 SHERIDAN ST DEARBORN MI 48128 - 1834 HARRIS, TIMOTHY J HAYLER, GARY F HENDERSON, OTIS W 320 ISLAND WAY # 504 HAYLER, MURIEL L HENDERSON, IRENE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 123 E GLOHAVEN PL 400 ISLAND WAY # 1501 SIMPSONVILLE SC 29681 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 HERBOLD, HENRY J HERRIN, MARGARET A HESS, STEPHEN T 400 ISLAND WAY # 1212 400 ISLAND WAY # 912 270 SKIFF PT # B2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2160 HESS, STEPHEN T HESS, STEPHEN HINTZ, BRUCE T HESS, PAULINE D 305 WINDWARD ISL 17 ELIZABETH ST 301 ISLAND WAY # F CLEARWATER FL 33767 - FLORAL PARK NY 11001 - 2014 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2164 HINTZ, BRUCE T HOLLINS, DAVID M HOUSH GHOVAEE 270 SKIFF PT # A-2 HOLLINS, KERRI A NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2160 20 LAKERIDGE S SERVICES, INC. ORCHARD PARK NY 14127 - 3370 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FL 33755 HUSN1, FAROUK Y THE HUEY, CHARLES E HUTCHINS, LUZMARINA M THE HUSNI, 400 ISLAND WAY # 1408 ISIS N THE 301 ISLAND WAY # G CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 4000 0 ISLAND WAY # 1007 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2164 IMPARATO, MATTHEW F (OVINE, MICHAEL G ISLAND ESCAPE CONDO ASSN IMPARATO, DORIS (OVINE, AGNES A 17 PARK AVE 47-12 168TH ST 325 ISLAND WAY LODI NJ 07644 - 1515 FLUSHING NY 11358 - 3716 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2167 ISLAND ESTATES ASSOCIATION JANSEN, LAREN JESS, JOHN C FRANK DAME 2712 POWELL LN HERSONDALE FARM 140 ISLAND WAY #239 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - EGERTON FORSTA CLEARWATER, FL 33767 ASHFORD KENT TN2790B 00003 - GREAT BRITAIN JETT, GAYLE ANN KAHANU, DRAGO KANACH, JOHN H ZIMMER, DALE EDWARD KAHANU, DOROTHY 72 RAINBOW HILL RD 3130 MONROE WAY 3205 WYNNFIELD CT HILLSBOROUGH NJ 08844 - 3904 ALPHARETTA GA 30004 - MOBILE AL 36695 - 2539 KAPLANIS, ANNA KARAGAN, NICK KARAVELIS FAMILY TRUST 400 ISLAND WAY # 803 KARAGAN, ELAINE KARAVELIS, LEONIDAS THE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 2046 BIRCHWOOD LN 400 ISLAND WAY # 311 HIGHLAND IN 46322 - 3537 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 KATSAMAKIS, CLIFFORD KATTAN, HISHAM A KEDAN, ELLA THE KATSAMAKIS, PERICLES JENNINGS, BONITA J 2354 HADDON HALL PL 160 PARKSIDE DR 400 ISLAND WAY # 1602 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 ROSLYN NY 11577 - 2210 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2131 KEE, JOHN ROBERT KERINS, ROBERT J ROSEMARIE 35 DELAWARE AVE KELLY, KERINS, NELLY H 400 OTTOWA ON K2P-OZ3 CLISLANND DEARWATER WA WAY FL # # 1 1406 33767 400 ISLAND WAY # 403 00030- - 2137 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 CANADA KERSHAW, OLIVIA F KILGO, AMELIA A KILGO, EDWARD 6963 PINE NEEDLE DR KILGO ROBERT M 1227 DIVISADERO ST BOONES MILL VA 24065 - 2215 2416 FOXHEAD WAY SAN FRANCISCO CA 94115 - CLEARWATER FL 33759 - KINGSCOURT INV LTD KIOUSIS, TOM KLINGLER, MICHAEL R 2 LE MERCHANT ST KIOUSIS, FIFIKA 437 LEEWARD ISL ST PETER PORT 400 ISLAND WAY # 512 GUERNSEY GYI 2JJ 00000- CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2310 CHANNEL ISLANDS KLOCZKOWSKI, WITOLD W THE KOMETAS, ERMENE KOSTAKIS, PETER T KLOCZKOWSKI, REINA B THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 1010 PO BOX 614 320 ISLAND WAY # 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 MILLER PLACE NY 11764 - 0614 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2180 KOZAN, RONALD E • KROL, BRUCE KOZAN, KAREN L KROL, PATRICIA KUEHL, STEPHEN J 23 CAMELOT DR 2546 WALLACE DR 400 ISLAND WAY # 1511 OAK BROOK IL 60523 - 1733 FLOSSMOOR IL 60422 - 1243 CLEARWATER FL 33767- 2137 KULACH, STANLEY LAMBOUSIS, THEDORE D LAMORGESE, ORONZO KULACH, ANNA 7171 W GUNNISON ST LAMORGESE, CARMELA 330 HARBOR PSE HARWOOD HTS IL 60706 - 3892 4604 104TH ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CORONA NY 11368 - 2813 LANDRETH, BARBARA LAYMAN LANGELIER, RAYMOND J LAWRENCE, MICHAEL C BYPAS LANGELIER, MARGARET LAWRENCE, NANCY G LANDRETH, ROBERT N JR THE 115 DENISE DR 439 ISLAND WAY 401 LEEWARD IS SCHENECTADY NY 12309 - 1137 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2139 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2310 LAYTON, HORACE L LE GERE, EDMOND J LEON, ALFRED N JR 400 ISLAND WAY # 1706 LE GERE, DIANA LEON, JOSEFA E CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2131 2 LAKE RIDGE DR 320 ISLAND WAY # 108 MIDDLETOWN NY 10940 - 2156 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2180 LEZON, ROBERTA E LIAKOPOULOS, ODYSSEAS LIAPAKIS, MICHAEL 325 ISLAND WAY # 104 LIAKOPOULOS, CHRISTINE ZERVOUDIS, ELENI C CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2167 9005 N ORIOLE 400 ISLAND WAY MORTON GROVE IL 60053 - 1855 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2174 LIGNELL, SUE C LIVANOS, ARETI LOIBL, TAMIE J 400 ISLAND WAY # 1407 400 ISLAND WAY # 801 24420 HWY 145 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 DOLORES CO 81323 - LOMBARDI, DARREL J LOPEZ, JOSEPH A THE LOREN, LEWIS 1 320 ISLAND WAY # 103 LOPEZ, HERMELINDA THE LOREN, NANCY J CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2180 8613 S KOSTNER AVE 1780 STEAMBURG RD CHICAGO IL 60652 - 3542 HILLSDALE MI 49242 - 2075 LOREN, MAXINE G LOULOUSIS, CHRIS LYNCH, JAMES F JR 333 ISLAND WAY # 1-103 LOULOUSIS, BARBARA LYNCH, PATRICIA A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2173 3007 KENSINGTON AVE 400 ISLAND WAY # 1503 WESTCHESTER IL 60154 - 5136 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 LYONS, JUDITH A MALATESTA, JANE MANGAS, RICHARD L 400 ISLAND WAY # 903 298 SKIFF PT # 402 MANGAS, MURIEL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2163 90 DEERFIELD RD WEST CALDWELL NJ 07006 - 8133 MANN, PHILIP C MAREK, MILDRED E MARION, PAMELA A EST 298 SKIFF PT # 202 4833 E TRINDLE RD # 505 724 BAYWAY BLVD # 3A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2162 MECHANICSBURG PA 17050 - 3652 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MARTINELLI, NICHOLAS W MATTHEWS, DONALD 111 EAST RD MATTHEWS, CHERYL BROAD BROOK CT 06016 - 9582 45 LAKEWOOD RD MANASQUAN NJ 08736 - 3508 MAZIAN, FLORENCE 1 400 ISLAND WAY # 1112 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 MC CARY, TRACY B BALLANCE,TERESA 400 ISLAND WAY # 212 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 MC DONAGH, BRIDGET M MC DONAGH, JULIA A 400 ISLAND WAY # 708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 MELSON, JAMES L MELSON, PENNY S 301 ISLAND WAY # E CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MICHALAKIS, MARIO MICHALAKIS, HELEN 45 94TH ST BROOKLYN NY 11209 - 6603 MIRELLI, VINCENT KIPP, TERESA 10104 EAST BEXHILL DR KENSINGTON MD 20895 - MULRENNAN, JAMES MULRENNAN, MARGARET 400 ISLAND WAY # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 MYERS, MARLENE L 400 ISLAND WAY # 506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 NEWELL, MICHAEL THE NEWELL, MARY THE 1420 S OAKLAND AVE VILLA PARK IL 60181 - 3439 MC LAUGHLIN, EDA B 400 ISLAND WAY # 1403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 METALA, ELIZABETH THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 1003 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 MILLER, THOMAS J THE MILLER, QUINTON T THE 400 LARBOARD WAY # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2188 MOLINARO, FIFI 400 ISLAND WAY # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 MUNDY, ALAN E 400 ISLAND WAY # 610 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 NAULT, MARILYN J THE 333 ISLAND WAY # 2-106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2173 NOLTE, CARL NOLTE, FRIEDA H 400 ISLAND WAY # 901 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 MATTIMOE, JOHN G MATTIMOE, MARGARET M 2624 BARRINGTON DR TOLEDO OH 43606 - 3024 MC CASLAND, JAMES A MC CASLAND, MARIE J 1509 PRICE CIR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2511 MC NEILL, BARBARA K THE 1655 LEE RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1700 MEVIG, KARLEEN K MEVIG, ROBERT D 270 SKIFF PT # A-1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2160 MILLINGTON, OLGA 330 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2307 MONTERISI, FRANK MONTERISI, LUISE 14950 POWELLS COVE BLVD WHITESTONE NY 11357 - 1147 MURPHY, ALEIDA 400 ISLAND WAY # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 NESSAS, PETER NESSAS,ATHENA 400 ISLAND WAY # 603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 NOVAK, JOHN H NOVAK, JUDY A 400 ISLAND WAY # 1605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2131 NOVAK, LESLIE F O'BRIEN, MICHAEL P OHM, EDITH B NOVAK, LINDA N 325 ISLAND WAY # 107 298 SKIFF PT # 103 298 SKIFF PT # 102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2167 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2162 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2162 OLOFSSON, PER OLOF KATTFOTSVAGEN 12 NORRKOPING 603 66 00006 - SWEDEN ONZ, LINDA J 120 1ST ST E # 104 TIERRA VERDE FL 33715 - 1788 OWENS, RUSSELL I SCHERR, MARIE A 400 ISLAND WAY # 1705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2131 PANTELIS, KYRIACOS 400 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 PELICAN PORT HMOWNS ASSN INC 301 ISLAND WAY # H CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2164 PETERS, CHERYL A 333 ISLAND WAY # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2130 PIERCE, FRANK C JR PIERCE, MARIA A 13407 24 MILE RD SHELBY TWP MI 48315 - 1817 PLESKO-EVANS, FAYE L EVANS, AICY L 400 LARBOARD WAY # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2150 POTTS, FREDERICK 320 ISLAND WAY # 301 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2180 OLSON, CLYDE A OLSON, PATRICIA F PO BOX 645 INDIAN ROCKS BCH FL 33785 - 0645 ORLOWSKI, DAVE A 11418 W NORTH AVE WAUMATOSA WI 53226 - PALUMBO, BONITA 320 ISLAND WAY # 502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 PAPPAS, MICHAEL G 156 S MAIN ST AKRON OH 44308 - 1336 PEREZ, FRANK 400 LARBOARD WAY # 103 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2149 PETERS, MARGARET A PETERS, JAMES F 400 ISLAND WAY # 1205 CLEARWATER FL 33767 O'NEILL, MARION P 400 ISLAND WAY # 1201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 ORSATTI, CHARLES T 2200 TUSCANY TRCE PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 7737 PANETTA, JOHN D 196 ELIOT ST NATICK MA 01760 - 5509 PAREDES,LEANDRO TORRES, IRAIDA PO BOX 12273 SAN JUAN PR 00914 - 0273 PETERMAN, GISELA M 400 ISLAND WAY # 410 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 PETERS, ROBERT S PETERS, DONNA E 44600 JOHN ALDEN -2136 PLYMOUTH MI 48170 - 3715 PIGOTT, LEO P THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 POMPILIO, FRANK R THE POMPILIO, ANGELA THE 133 VANCE CT BARRINGTON IL 60010 - 1537 POUGAKIOTOU, NIOVI PO BOX 50411 THESSALONIKI 54013 - GREECE PITON, JAN 320 ISLAND WAY # 507 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 PONIROS, MARKOS THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 1402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 POULIS, ASPACIA THE 1339 WESTBROOK ST PORTLAND ME 04102 - 1618 POULOS, JAMES POULOS,PETER PRAY, JOHN IJR POULOS, RINE POULOS, CHRISOULA PRAY, DIANE E 400 ISLAND WAY # 409 400 ISLAND WAY # 1412 999 CIRCLE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 DOVER DE 19901 - PRIHODA, JAMES J THE PRIHODA, KATHLEEN A THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 707 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 RAFTERY, BRIAN J 400 ISLAND WAY # 611 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 RAWDAN, BERNIE A PO BOX 3038 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8038 REMARK, MARIANNE THE 11513 STREAMVIEW AVE UNIONTOWN OH 44685 - 8214 RICHARDSON, BEATRICE THE DETERS, MARY THE 2000 15TH AVE SE # 533 SAINT CLOUD MN 56304 - 2428 RODRIGUEZ, MAURO RODRIGUEZ, ROSALIA C 418 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2309 SANDERS, SCOTT R SANDERS, EMMA J 424 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 ?PUORTO, JOHN W CHAPPUIS, ISABELLE 400 ISLAND WAY # 1405 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 RATHMELL, JOHN T RATHMELL, JANET D 400 ISLAND WAY # 1708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2131 RAYMON, FAYE B 400 ISLAND WAY # 1105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 REYNOLDS, GARY M 406 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2309 0 RAFFAELE, ROBERT J RAFFAELE, DEANNA L 320 ISLAND WAY # 211 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2180 RATSOS, NIKI 400 ISLAND WAY # 606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 REGAN,FRANK J 10717 DALTON AVE TAMPA FL 33767 - 2134 RICE, JAMES E RICE, JENNIFER R 109 SADDLE RIDGE LN NELLYSFORD VA 22958 - 8008 RICHIUSO, JOSEPH RIORDAN, ROBERT RICHIUSO, MADELYN RIORDAN, KATHLEEN 2352 CARDINAL DR 40 COLUMBUS AVE POINT PLEASANT BEACH NJ 08742 - HASBROUCK HTS NJ 07604 - 1023 RODRIGUEZ, SERGIO RODRIGUEZ, SANDRA G 320 ISLAND WAY # 608 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 SAVINO, DANIEL SAVINO, MARIA 297 DELMAR AVE -2309 STATEN ISLAND NY 10312 - 2837 SEA ISLAND APTS 2 CONDO ASSN 1 270 SKIFF PT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2177 SEITHER, ELIZABETH C 132 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2216 SEA ISLAND CONDO I ASSN INC 400 LARBOARD WAY APT 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2188 ROUSKAS, MICHAEL 400 ISLAND WAY # 1009 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 SCOPIS, JOHN W SCOPIS, ELEANORA 400 ISLAND WAY # 1107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 SEALOCK, ERIC SEALOCK, PATRICIA 400 ISLAND WAY # 503 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 SHAMGAR, M 400 ISLAND WAY # 1110 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 SHAPIRO, DANIEL A 425 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2310 SHAW, LEROY J SHEA, FRANK SHEPHERD, WESLEY W 400 ISLAND WAY # 1701 SHEA, PATRICIA A SHEPHERD, ROSALIE M CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2131 400 ISLAND WAY # 105 325 ISLAND WAY # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2167 SHULER, GARY L SHULER, CHERYL A 1848 RIDGEBURY DR HILLIARD OH 43026 - 8375 SMYTH, GREGORY B 8 COMMANCHE DR NEPEAN ON K2E 6E9 00030 - CANADA SOULIOS, SOCRATIS SOULIOS, EVDOXIA 8827 PONTIAC ST QUEENS VLG NY 11427 - 2719 STREEM, RONALD M THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 1409 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 SUTPHEN, ELAINE 400 ISLAND WAY # 1608 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2131 SZENTAL, MARY 320 ISLAND WAY # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2180 TANIOS, ISHAC S TANIOS, MARY M 618 E OLIVE ST ARLINGTON HEIGHTS IL 60004 - 4951 THEODOR, THOMAS THEODOR, NIKE 11300 RTE 71 YORKVILLE IL 60560 - TRAIFOROS, PETER TRAIFOROS, ANGIE 5 RED OAKS CRES TORONTO ON M4G 1A8 CANADA 0 0 SKIFF POINT CONDO ASSN INC 298 SKIFF PT # 402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2163 SORENSEN, BETHANY A 640 S BAYWAY BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2605 STEPHENS, MARY C 400 ISLAND WAY # 909 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 STUPANSKY, DOROTHY J 320 ISLAND WAY # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 SUTTON, DEBORAH 16306 2ND ST E REDINGTON BEACH FL 33708 - TAGLIA EXCHANGE TRUST 6 COTTAGE ST STE 3 PEPPERELL MA 01463 - TELECKI, GREGORY TELECKI, CZESLAWA 320 ISLAND WAY # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 THEOFILIS, HELEN B 400 ISLAND WAY # 612 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 TRIVEDI, JITENDRA H TRIVEDI, RITA J 320 ISLAND WAY # 506 00030- CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 SMINK, CAROLE L 325 ISLAND WAY # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2167 SOTTILE, VINCENT J 400 ISLAND WAY # 1509 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2137 STRATTON, PEGGY E THE 1279 CRESTVIEW AVE SW NEW PHILADELPHIA OH 44663 - 9642 SULLIVAN, SHERRI 400 ISLAND WAY # 1707 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2131 SWARTZ, KATHRYN L SWARTZ, CHARLES N 1584 WOODWIND CT FORT MYERS FL 33919 - 2029 TAGLIA, ANTHONY TAGLIA, MARY 400 ISLAND WAY # 804 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 TENEDIOS, CHRIS TENEDIOS, STEVE 4235 ARIEL AVE TOLEDO OH 43623 - 3716 THOMAS, WILLIAM E THOMAS, JOAN F 6394 LONG POINT RD BREWERTON NY 13029 - 8623 TSETSEKAS, JOHN TSETSEKAS, HARRIET 400 ISLAND WAY # 1604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2131 VAFIADES-VENIZELOS, POPI VASIL, CYRUS THE VASILAROS, NICHOLAS 333 ISLAND WAY # 201 400 ISLAND WAY # 508 VASILAROS, GERALDINE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2183 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 20407 GRESHAM ST WINNETKA CA 91306 - 1006 VILLAGE ON ISLAND ESTATES TOM BAIOCCO 240 WINDWARD PASSAGE, UNIT 803 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 WALZ, MARK R 270 SKIFF POINT # B-5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2161 WASFY, GAMAL M WASFY, FATMA G 400 ISLAND WAY # 1111 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 WENDKOS, JOHN WENDKOS, SUSAN 408 N NASSAU DR MARGATE CITY NJ 08402 - 1450 WHITEHURST, MICHAEL WHITEHURST, CATHERINE 230 WINDWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2325 WINK, STANLEY J WINK, WANDA T 400 LARBOARD WAY # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2187 WOJCIECHOWKI, JOHN 1 LONG COVE CT LAKE-IN-THE-HILL.IL 60156 - 6332 YOUNG, MARY A 400 ISLAND WAY # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 ZELONY, FRANCES 400 ISLAND WAY # 1206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2136 ZIAS, GEORGE ZIAS, KALITSA 400 ISLAND WAY # 706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134 VODDE, LEO B 1601 S HARRISON ST FORT WAYNE IN 46802 - 5208 WAMBSER, JOHN R WAMBSER, PHYLLIS A 2 BAY CLUB DR BAYSIDE NY 11360 - 2917 WALTON, FLORENCE D THE 400 ISLAND WAY # 203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2132 WARSH, JOANNE 400 ISLAND WAY # 509 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2133 WEBBER, PAUL W & BENNA L REV L WEHOFER, ELLEN J THE WEBBER, PAUL W BEN 100 S WAPELLA AVE 234 DOLPHIN POINT RD # 5 MT PROSPECT IL 60056 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2110 WEST, RICHARD L 311 ISLAND WAY # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2127 WILSON, JASON E WILSON, LENA R 903 GRAND CYPRESS CT CINCINNATI OH 45245 - 3334 WITHERS, WARREN CLAY WITHERS, SUSAN 400 LARBOARD WAY # 205 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2187 WOJCIK, ELSIE M 28359 FORESTBROOK DR FARMINGTN HLS MI 48334 - 5214 ZACKEY, GEORGETTE M HECQUET, PHILIP O 3 SALTERNE MEADOWS BUDLEIGH SALTERON DEVON EX96SP 00009 - UNITED KINGDOM ZERVOUDIS, STEVE ZERVOUDIS, ANGELA 400 ISLAND WAY # 1703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 WETHERELL, GAYLE WETHERELL, STEVEN 298 SKIFF PT # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2163 WINK, JOSEPH 400 LARBOARD WAY # 105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2187 WOHLGEMUTH, GARY G WOHLGEMUTH, DARLENE 366 LARBOARD WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2147 WOOD, WILLIAM N WOOD, JANET R 320 ISLAND WAY # 107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2180 ZANTAL, PETER ZANTAL, LORETTA A 400 ISLAND WAY #809 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2135 ZEVGOLIS, GEORGE P ZEVGOLIS, BEBA H 2031 HERITAGE PINES DR -2131 CARY NC 27519 - 7132 0 0 Skip Shepherd Marine Consultant Date: 8/9/05 From: Wesley and Rosalie Shepherd 325 Island Way #1ol, Clearwater Beach, FI 33767 727-365-0943 cell phone To: Michael Delk Community Development Board City of Clearwater Planning Dept. PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 Re: Application of Ronald and Karen Kozan, (Newkirk Ventures Inc.) for construction of Condominium at 405 Island Way Dear Mr. Delk, 325 Island Way, Unit #101 Clearwater, FL 33767 727-461-7673 (home) 727-365-0943 (cell) We are property owners that have lived on Island Estates for the past 15 years. We wish to notify you that we are AGAINST the the application of Ronald and Karen Kozan, (Newkirk Ventures Inc.) for the proposed condominium development at 4o5 Island Way. There is too much traffic and congestion as it is along Island Way. We do not wish to have what has happened on the beach, happen to Island Estates. We strongly oppose this project. Please do not let this happen. We do not approve of this project. Thank you. Sincerely, CWesley and Rosalie Shepherd 00S pLANNING & CEVF-LOPMENT SERVICES CLFARWAT77-, `tv. _ ,%.1v,O A PIAtvN ?CJrt?;tNT S?//R?? VIG^?nSW 1