FLD2010-03004; 22 BAY ESPLANADE; 22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUMFLD2010-03004
22 BAY ESPLANADE
Date Received: 3/1/2010
22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUM
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 258A
PLANNER OF RECORD: MJJ
e
CDB Meeting Date: June 15, 2010
Case Number: FLD2010-03004
Agenda Item: D.3.
Owner/ Applicant: Mathura Properties #5, LLC
Agent: Tuan Huynh, P.E., Regional Consulting Engineers, LLC
Address: 22 Bqy Esplanade
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit two attached dwellings
in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 4,350 square feet, a lot
width of 50 feet, a front (south) setback of 10 feet (to building), a
side (east) setback of five feet (to building), a side (west) setback of
five feet (to building), a rear (north) setback of 10 feet (to
building), a building height of 30 feet (to midpoint of roof) and
four parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project under the provisions of Community Development Code
Section 2-803.C.
CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District
CURRENT LAND USE
PLAN CATEGORY: Resort Facility High (RFH) Category
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant
Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings
EXISTING North: Tourist (T) District
SURROUNDING Attached dwellings
ZONING AND USES: South: Tourist (T) District
Government Use; and Off-Street Parking Lot
East: Tourist (T) District
Automobile Service Station; and Retail Sales
and Services
West: Tourist (T) District
Overnight Accommodations; and Restaurant
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.099 acre site is located on the north side of Bay Esplanade approximately 95 feet west of
Mandalay Avenue and has 50 feet of frontage on Bay Esplanade. The property is zoned Tourist
(T) District and is currently vacant. The site is located within the special area redevelopment
Community Development Board -June 15, 2010
FLD2010-03004 - 1 of 7
Y
plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District which is an area of transition
between resort uses to the south and the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of
Acacia Street. The preferred form of development is a mix of uses primarily including new
overnight accommodations and attached dwellings throughout the District with limited
retail/commercial and mixed use development fronting Mandalay Avenue between Bay
Esplanade and Somerset Street. To ensure that the scale and character of development in "Old
Florida" provides the desired transition between the adjacent tourist and residential areas,
enhanced site design performance is a priority, including greater setbacks.
The immediate vicinity is composed of an off-street parking lot, attached dwellings, retail sales
and services, restaurants, governmental uses and an automobile service station. Structures in the
area vary in height between one and three stories, and generally resemble architecture from the
1950's.
Development Proposal:
On March 1, 2010, a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application was submitted for
a two-unit attached dwelling development on the subject property. The proposed building will
have two living floors elevated above the parking area. Each of the living floors will include
approximately 2,170 square feet of livable space and will have three bedrooms. An elevator,
located in the northwest comer of the building as well as a stairwell located along the north
fagade, will provide access to the units. The proposed building will have a modern design that is
accentuated through the incorporation of architectural elements such as balconies enclosed with
glass and by using earth tone building colors. Parking and black barrel solid waste staging area
will be located on the ground floor.
The proposal includes a reduction to lot area for attached dwellings in the T District from 5,000
square feet to 4,350 square feet. The reduction to lot area amounts to a 13 percent reduction.
The proposal also includes a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building), side (east and west)
setbacks of five feet (to building) and a rear (north) setback of 10 feet (to building). Staff has
consistently advised the applicant on this proposal that the land area is too small to support the
proposed development and lot consolidation would result in a project design that complies with
the objectives of Beach by Design and more closely complies with the requirements of the
Community Development Code (CDC).
Reducing the required 10-foot side setback as per the "Old Florida" District to the proposed side
(east and west) setbacks of five feet (to building) are allowed only if an improved site plan,
increased landscaping and/or improved design and appearance is provided. With regard to the
site plan, the proposed building and site design meets minimum design standards only and does
not reflect an improvement upon these minimums. Furthermore, and due to site constraints, the
off-street parking layout proposed requires accessing the parking spaces and/or exiting the
building to be accomplished through multiple turning movements. The landscaping proposed
also meets minimum standards in the front setback, but landscaping provided is minimal due to
site constraints and the ingress/egress area needed for vehicular traffic. Due to the Fire
Department's requirement that at a minimum five feet of clearance be provided around the entire
building, no landscaping can exist within the side setbacks where it would be most beneficial to
Community Development Board -June 15, 2010
FLD2010-03004 - 2 of 7
T'
buffer the subject property from the gas station to the east and overnight accommodations to the
west. Furthermore, while a five foot rear (north) landscape buffer that is not required by Code or
Beach by Design has been provided, it is staff's recommendation that this does not constitute
increased landscaping in a way to directly mitigate the requested reduction of the side (east and
west) setbacks.
Densit : Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules for the Resort Facilities High (RFH) land use
category and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum density is 30 units per acre. As the lot area is
4,350 square feet (0.099 acres), two dwelling units are allowed and therefore, the proposed
density is in compliance.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable ISR
is 0.95. The proposed ISR is 0.58, which is consistent with the Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of
comparison, the minimum lot area for attached dwellings use can range from 5,000 - 10,000
square feet. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width can range from 50 - 100 feet.
The lot width along Bay Esplanade is 50 feet, which is consistent with the Code provisions for
attached dwellings. The proposed lot area for this parcel is 4,350 square feet (0.998 acres),
which is inconsistent with the Code provisions for attached dwellings.
Minimum Setbacks: The "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which supersedes those
development standards set forth in the CDC, requires a 15 foot front setback as well as 10 foot
side and rear setbacks for the subject property. While a 15 foot front and 10 foot rear setback has
been provided, only five foot side setbacks are proposed. Pursuant to Beach by Design, the
required 10 foot side setback may be reduced to five feet if, and as previously stated, the reduced
setback results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required
and/or improved design and appearance. It is the determination of staff that none of these
objectives would be achieved through the development proposal. As such, staff does not support
the reduction of the 10 foot side setbacks required by the "Old Florida" District of Beach by
Design.
Maximum Building Hei hg t: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no maximum height for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
maximum height for attached dwellings use can range from 35 - 100 feet. The proposal includes
a building height of 30 feet (to midpoint of roof), which is consistent with the Code provisions.
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum required parking for
attached dwellings is two spaces per unit. The proposal provides four parking spaces, which is
consistent with the Code provisions for a two-unit development.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment
must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. The
Community Development Board -June 15, 2010
FLD2010-03004 - 3 of 7
proposal does not include the location of exterior mechanical equipment. Therefore, review for
screening was not possible.
Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the
proposed driveway on Bay Esplanade, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will
obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20
foot sight visibility triangles. The proposal was reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering
Department and found to be acceptable.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision,
all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such
undergrounding is not practicable. The proposal does not indicate the relocation of the existing
aboveground utilities underground; as such compliance with this requirement cannot be
determined.
Landscaping: Pursuant to the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, a 10 foot front
landscape buffer is required. The proposal includes a 10 foot front landscape buffer which is
consistent with the Beach by Design requirement.
Solid Waste: The proposal provides for black barrel service for each of the units, which is
consistent with the Code provisions.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject
property.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and
criteria as per CDC Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803 and the "Old Florida" District of Beach by
Design:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Density 30 dwelling units per acre 2 units X
(2 dwelling units) (20.2 units per acre)
Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.58 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 4,350 sq. ft. (0.099 acres) X'
Minimum Lot Width N/A 50 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: 15 feet South: 15 feet (to building) X
Rear: 10 feet North: 10 feet (to building) X
Side: 10 feet East: 5 feet (to building) X
West: 5 feet (to building) X
Maximum Height N/A 30 feet (to midpoint of roof) X
Minimum 2 spaces per dwelling unit 4 spaces X
Off-Street Parking (4 spaces required)
I See analysis in Staff Report.
Community Development Board -June 15, 2010
FLD2010-03004 - 4 of 7
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.C (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment
and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and ofi street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,
porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and appropriate distances between buildings.
Community Development Board - June 15, 2010
FLD2010-03004 - 5 of 7
T_
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of x
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of May 6, 2010, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to
move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following:
Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 0.099-acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities
High (RFH) land use plan category;
2. That the site is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part
of the "Old Florida" District;
3. That the intent of the "Old Florida" District is to provide an area of transition between resort
uses to the south and the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia Street
using enhanced site design performance such as greater setbacks;
4. That adjacent uses are zoned T District developed with multi-family dwellings generally
between one and three stories in height, with the surrounding area a mixture of off-street
parking lot, attached dwellings, retail sales and services, restaurants, government uses and an
automobile service station;
5. That the subject property is vacant;
6. That the subject property has a lot area of 4,350 square feet;
7. That the proposal includes two attached dwelling units elevated over off-street parking;
8. That the site is permitted two dwelling units (20.2 dwelling units per acre);
9. That based on a parking ratio of two spaces per dwelling unit, a total of four spaces are
required;
Community Development Board - June 15, 2010
FLD201 0-03004 - 6 of 7
10. That the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design requires 10 foot side setbacks that may be
reduced to five feet if an improved site plan, increased landscaping and/or improved design
and appearance is provided;
11. That the proposal includes five foot side setbacks with the only justification being a five foot
landscape buffer on the north property line that is not required by Code; and
12. There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the lot area of the subject property (4,350 square feet) is not consistent with the
minimum required for attached dwelling development (5,000 square feet) within the Tourist
(T) District as per CDC Table 2-803, and this lot area results in a parcel that is too small for a
development at the proposed scale;
2. That the proposal's reduced side (east and west) setbacks does not comply with the "Old
Florida" District's intent of providing the desired transition between the adjacent tourist and
residential areas through site design such as greater setbacks;
3. That the proposal does not comply with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design where
the required 10-foot side setback may be reduced to five feet if the reduced setback results in
an improved site plan, landscaped areas in excess of the minimum required and/ or improved
design and appearance as none of these objectives would be achieved by the proposal;
4. That the development proposal is not consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and
2-803 of the Community Development Code;
5. That the development proposal is not consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
803.C of the Community Development Code; and
6. That the development proposal is not consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-913.A of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends DENIAL of the
Flexible Development application to permit two attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District
with a lot area of 4,350 square feet, a lot width of 50 feet, a front (south) setback of 10 feet (to
building), a side (east) setback of five feet (to building), a side (west) setback of five feet (to
building), a rear (north) setback of 10 feet (to building), a building height of 30 feet (to midpoint
of roof) and four parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the
provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.C.
Prepared by: Planning and Development Department Staff:
Matthe ackson, Planner II
ATTACHMENTS: Photographs of Site and Vicinity; Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIBay Esplande 22 (7) 06.15.10 CDB - MJABay Esplanade 22
Staff Report 0615.2010 CDB.doc
Community Development Board - June 15, 2010
FLD2010-03004 - 7 of 7
Matthew Jackson
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727) 562-4836
matthew.iackson(&myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
? Planner H
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 2008 to Present
Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and
variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of
development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning
assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning
ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review
committees, boards, and meetings.
? Planner I
Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007
Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances.
In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained
submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead
project kick-off meetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting
documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject
matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs.
Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made
disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities.
? Manager
Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004
Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment
complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and
inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and
delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing
and special events.
? Linguist
US Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995
Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military
readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering
operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian
authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldierg during training exercises. Liaison
between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training.
EDUCATION
? Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007
? Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004
10
ASTER c
y
Q l ? 5
O ACACIA ST ;
MJERSE7 57 N
IDLE WILD
I
GLENDALE ROYAL AY y?.R
HEILWOOD
O BAY
AVALON F ?^
w C<
KE Jt3e¢a Z
a N C?J
Y m
ESPLANADE
1
PROJECT ROCFG414`AY
SITE Ambler
HAYMIONT ST
31gfifi Q01
W Y¢
cn pOLLJT ?o
O O
PAPAYA ST
Y
DOR
z
°
_
z
Pier SO O rcg
Causeway BNd .?
Location Map
Owner: MATHURA PROPERTIES # 5 LLC Case: FLD2010-03004
Site: 22 Bay Esplanade Property Size: 0.10 acres
PIN: 05-29-15-16362-008-0120 Atlas Page: 258A
f
629 634
?2LLM L] 2
619
HEILWOOD ST
0
n " h °' N N 622 2
622 lLl
620
618
614 611
N v ?o m 612
/1 .<
OSIR
N ? N N N N R1
? ^ ? N N N N N
604
602
pp
N N N Q6 0
OSIR 605 606 y
605 D
600 m
584
mm=JKENDALL ST
603
P I I
6,04
580 602
°p N M 601 p
V
I I OSIR OS
534
532 Q
@z
C 521 P
0
p N
/7 A/?( A I/A y nT
T cN 530
HDR
rF=777 l
Zoning Map
Owner: MATHURA PROPERTIES # 5 LLC Case: FLD2010-03004
Site: 22 Bay Esplanade Property Size: 0.10 acres
PIN: 05-29-15-16362-008-0120 Atlas Page: 258A
31
114 10 629 2 9834
,o 0 5 632
MEXICO " 819 3 11
W HEILWOOD ST s rl T _
ao ^
_ _3
2
4 .?.
5 ems.
6 N I r
7 8
1 522
520
18
I 01 - 4 -
5
C u
822 L3436 ? ..
_
-
15 1 14
13
12
11 A v I gO
I
6 so 511 60
1 1
l 12 L -
'1 I 8
10 +p
I N N 10 10 7
II 0
Open Space
r --I
I-57924 - 4
s AVALON ST e I IF I Boe A
I .°-' N N llI r e 2 C
3 s ftetn i OaS+ s V?
14 7 ,8 t i SS?? " ^ < -
z I- - 04 I I L zJ 0 boo
- -I15 tt6 hod: 11 z I I +
' I a in. N. o 584
s KENDALL ST s 1 $ Q 10 4
N ccom ar is I
E
_- i 4 1 s bmnWdaitior st s
s I
2 1 - I- - - -2- 04 y - ?-- - -
14 z of-0 Wes-1 Z30 il Igs; " `'. 8 1 7 1 6
estaurl5nt 13 I ``*.
i nd ices ice$ R, I
54
o so ?I
5
m BAY ESPLANADE $
L24792
_i
G1n"ntal
Uses 534
532
(16)
N
ep N
00 531 0
?t
w Governm6htal- )
Q Uses
J
Z
?Q 521
t? Y1 01 M I
• ..
1 .. N 53
2
3
4
5 I
0
M
Existing Map
Owner: MATHURA PROPERTIES # 5 LLC Case: FLD2010-03004
Site: 22 Bay Esplanade Property Size: 0.10 acres
PIN: 05-29-15-16362-008-0120 Atlas Page: 258A
II
hl Auk
Aerial
Owner: MATHURA PROPERTIES # 5 LLC Case: FLD2010-03004
Site: 22 Bay Esplanade Property Size: 0.10 acres
PIN: 05-29-15-16362-008-0120 Atlas Page: 258A
!:j rV
22 Bay Esplanade
FLD2010-03004
View from south property line looking north.
View from southeast corner of the property looking northwest.
View from southwest corner of property looking northeast.
RI:?__j 1f )I ?A[. ,( ;(_) N ?? I It P.N kJ FiiiC YICJFFk'?: 1, LA_
2442 Grand Central Parkway, Unit 16
Orlando, Florida 32839
Telephone: (407) 812-5480
E-mail: 1uan aycell.com
May 14, 2010
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Attention: Mr. Matthew Jackson, Planner II
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
SUBJECT: 22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUM
CASE # FLD 2010-03004
RESPONSES TO FINAL DRC STAFF COMMENTS
Dear staff:
The following are the engineer's response to the review comments. Please feel free to contact the
architectural designer at KAD Design, Inc. (contact Intiaz Karim / 407-344-4122) on the building related
comments.
Below are the original commments by DRC staff in italics and our responses in bold.
1. DRC DEPARTMENT - ENVIRONMENTAL:
Comment #1 Prior to issuance of building permit, building plans must demonstrate proposed
sea turtle friendly lighting in accordance with City code (CDC Section 3-1302)
and state law (F.A.C. 62B-55). No light within 300 feet shall be visible or extend
in areas identified as Sea Turtle Nesting Areas during the nesting season of May
1 to October 31. Areas where security and public safety require lighting,
alternative light management approaches shall be applied.
Response: We acknowledged this comment & conditions prior to issuance of the
building permit concerning the sea turtle-friendly lighting
requirements on-site. A note # 8 was added to the revised Site Plan
(sheet 3).
II. DRC DEPARTMENT - FIRE:
Comment #1 FDC is required, and shall be a minimum of 15'from building and shall have a
fire hydrant within 25'- 50 feet'. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
412312010 Condition is not addressed, plan shows the Fire Department
Connection on the fire line, this SHALL be a free standing fire department
Regional Consulting Engineers, LLC
22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUM - Engineer's Responses to FINAL DRC Comments Page 2
May 14, 2010
connection on a separate line on the system side of the riser. No fire hydrant is
shown within 25'- 50 feet ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB.
Response: We acknowledged this comment & conditions prior to Community
Development Board (CDB). The revised Grading and Utility Plan
(sheet 4) now shows a separate line for the FDC main into the
proposed building and is within 25' - 50' of the new fire hydrant.
Comment #2 Clearances between buildings must meet the requirements of Florida Building
code Chapter 6 for fire separation Provide details to meet the requirements
ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
412312010 Response letter acknowledged comment but did not answer the
question. WILL it meet Florida Building Code requirement?
Provide verification that this clearance has been met. ACKNOWLEDGE
PRIOR TO CDB.
Response: The proposed west condominium building face 2"d and 3`d floor
living areas is 10 feet from the property line. The existing Palm
Pavilion Inn Motel is 5 feet from its property line. Thus, we have
about 15 feet of separation between our proposed condo and
existing motel building. According to the architectural designer at
KAD Design, Inc. per the Florida Building Code, Chapter 6, if fire
separation distance is more than or equal to 10 feet then the
Exterior Wall Rating = 0
TYPE VB CONSTRUCTION
We also have acknowledged this comment and conditions prior to
Community Development Board (CDB).
Comment #3 Note: whenever a proposed development will be required to install one or more
fire hydrants as a condition of approval and the proposed development will be
equipped with an internal fire protection system (fire sprinklers, standpipes, or
both) afire hydrant shall be located within 25-50 feet, as measured along a
normal access route of the fire department connection for such internal system.
ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
412312010 Revised plan shows afire hydrant on the plan it is 75 feet from the
building. A second fire hydrant is still required for fire department connection.
Add a second fire hydrant to meet the condition. In your fire flow calculations it
does mention afire hydrant but does not show one. Show the location of this
proposed fire hydrant. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB.
Response: A new fire hydrant has been added to the revised Grading and
Utility Plan near the SW corner of the property within the right-of-
way. The fire hydrant is about 10 feet from the proposed FDC on-
site.
We also have acknowledged this comment and conditions prior to
Community Development Board (CDB).
Regional Consulting Engineers, LLC
22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUM - Engineer's Responses to FINAL DRC Comments Page 3
May 14, 2010
III. DRC DEPARTMENT - LAND RESOURCE:
Comment #1 4/28/10-Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The general
rule for hardwoods is one foot RADIUS for each diameter inch (DBH). Provide
prior to CDB.
3/25/10-Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The general
rule for hardwoods is one foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH). Provide
prior to CDB.
Response: The revised Site Plan (sheet 3) shows the correct canopy radius of 12
feet for the existing 12" oak tree to the east on the Hess Gas Station
site.
Comment #2 Show root prune requirements for the storm pipe that falls under the oak tree
canopy on the east property line prior to Building.
Response: A note has been added to the Grading and Utility Plan (sheet 4)
requiring the roots to be pruned within the canopy area under the
new storm pipe. This is required prior to Building permit issuance.
IV. DRC DEPARTMENT - PARK & RECREATION:
Comment #1 Site data table needs to reflect if property had any previous residences or
structures. Once that information is provided, a determination can be made on
P&R impact fees (recreation facilityfees may be due on this project).
Information will need to be provided prior to issuance of building permit.
Response: Per discussion at DRC, the existing site had at one time a rental
cottage structure but it was demolished. The site is now vacant. A note
# 20 was added to the revised Site Plan (sheet 3) site data to reflect
this. We acknowledged that this information will be used to determine
the P & R impact fees prior to issuance of the building permit.
V. DRC DEPARTMENT - PLANNING:
Comment #1 Per the Old Florida guidelines in Beach by Design, side setbacks of 10 feet are
required except in the case where the proposed building is 35 feet or less in
height. If the proposed building is 35 feet or less in height a reduction of side
setback to five feet is possible if the decreased setback results in an improved site
plan. As side setbacks of five feet are proposed, provide justification that an
improved site plan is proposed. Prior to CDB submittal.
Response: We consider the revised Site Plan to be an improved site plan over the
originally submittal. First, we have re-designed the stormwater
retention facility to be under ground to increase the available areas for
landscaping and green space. Second, decreasing the side setback
Regional Consulting Engineers, LLC
22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUM - Engineer's Responses to FINAL DRC Comments Page 4
May 14, 2010
from 10 feet to 5 feet (only along the east side) will allow a larger 1S`
floor car garage facility. The larger garage area will provide better
internal vehicle circulations and parking movements. It also provides
better ingress/egress access in and out of the property for residences
and guests. Third, decreasing the side setback to 5 feet along east side
will allow a larger building footprint width. This will help the
architectural designer by allowing more flexibility in designing the 2"d
and 3rd floor living area layouts and provide a better product to
enhance the surrounding adjacent beach front area.
Comment #2 4.2 Provide revised color building elevations with CDB submittal prior to
5.14.2010.
Response: Please see enclosed revised color building plans (8.5" x 11" size)
showing the north, south, east, and west sides building elevation views
provided by the architectural designer, KAD Design, Inc.
Comment #3 4.2 Applicant provided response that new sidewalk materials will be used
during final construction plans. This is not acceptable and new sidewalk
materials note needs to be on plans to be submitted to CDB by 5.14.10.
Response: The revised Site Plan (sheet 3) now shows the proposed sidewalk out
front to be a concrete/brick paver materials to differentiate from the
typical suburban concrete sidewalks.
Comment #4 As the Fire Department required five foot clear path around the entire building,
remove landscaping on the east and west sides of the building. Revise plans
prior to CDB submittal by 5.14.10.
Response: Per the revised Landscape Plan (sheet 5), the perimeter landscaping
and planting along the east and west side of the property have been
removed to provide a 5 foot clear path around the building for fire
access and safety requirements.
Comment #5 Remove bollards in parking spaces. The bollards reduce the parking stall depths
to 17 feet where 18 feet is required. Revise plans prior to CDB submittal by
5.14.10.
Response: The bollards have been removed on the revised Site Plan (sheet 3).
Regional Consulting Engineers, LLC
22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUM - Engineer's Responses to FINAL DRC Comments Page 5
May 14, 2010
Comment #6 Clarify ofsupport columns are to be used. If support columns are to be used,
they must meet the parking design standards per Section 3-1402.1 of the
Community Development Code. Prior to CDB submittal by 5.14.10.
Response: Per discussion with the project architect and structural engineer,
concrete support columns will be used. The support columns will be
designed to meet the parking design standards per section 3-1402.I of
the Community Development Code.
IV. DRC DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING:
Comment # Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Indicate on the plans that concrete
driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6"
thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w. w. m.
(City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #103, page
2/2).
Response: We acknowledged that the above concrete driveway apron
requirements must be provided prior to issuance of the Building
Permit. The above driveway apron specification is now provided on
the revised Site Plan (sheet 3).
If you have any questions, please feel free to call my cell phone at (407) 340-5713 or e-mail at
tuan(i4cefl.com.
Sincerely,
REGIONAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC
9 jfl j?
Tuan Huynh, P.E.
Principal
Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
22 BAY ESPLANADE
FLD2010-03004
22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUM
Zoning: T atlas# 256A
n SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
I- SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
13 /SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
3- SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1.405.00
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
-- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT -
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Mathura Properties # 5, LLC
MAILING ADDRESS: 1901 South John Young Parkway, Suite 101, Kissimmee, FL 34741
- --- ------------------------------- ---- ---
PHONE NUMBER: (321) 284-4631 FAX NUMBER: (407) 518-1134
CELL NUMBER (407) 341-5582 EMAIL: cdmathuraRhotmail.com
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Devan Mathura, Managing Member
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: Tuan Huynh, P.E. (Regional Consulting Engineers, LLC)
MAILING ADDRESS: 7200 Lake Ellenor Drive, Suite 105, Orlando, FL 32809
PHONE NUMBER: (407) 812-5480 FAX NUMBER: (407) 812-5480
CELL NUMBER: (407) 340-5713 EMAIL: tuan(Cl,rcefl.com
-
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: 22 Bay Esplanade Condominium PROJECT VALUATION: $500,000
STREET ADDRESS 22 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater FL 33767
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 05-29-15-16362-008-0120
PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0,10 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 4,350
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 12, Block 8, Plat Book 11, and Page 5 of Pinellas County
-------------
PROPOSED USE(S): Condominium
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Specifically identify the request Proposed 2 unit condominium with living area of 2'480 SF (2nd & 3`d levels .
g
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all _
Bottom level - five (5) cars parking area, elevator, and stairway areas.
requested code deviations; e.g. Code deviation Lot size is only 4 4,350 SF, which is less than 5,000 SF required.
q
'
reduction in required number of
parking spaces, specific use, etc.) ----__-
.___-- _
- ---___--- __-_-----------?-------_-_--
Mezzanine on top level for common use area.
S:\09.BAY ESPLANADE\DOCS\BAY ESPLANADE CONDO - City Comprehensive Infill Project (COMPLETED ON 03-01-10).doc
Page 1 of 8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO T (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
0 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
^ /Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
Proposed condominium development will blend in well with surrounding uses in the Tourist (T) zoning District.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
Proposed condominium development will enhance the existing properties adjacent.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use_
The proposed condominium development will have internal parking facilities, retention pond, water, & sewer, and sprinkler
system for building to protect the surrounding area from impacts.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed condominium parking facility (bottom level) will reduce the need for public parking and traffic congestions on the
local road network.
- - -- - - - .------ -.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Yes, the proposed condominium development is consistent with the adjacent parcel uses within the Tourist (T) District.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
The proposed 2 unit condominium has minimal adverse affects on the adjacent area due to the small scale nature of the
development.
S:\09.BAY ESPLANADE\DOCS\BAY ESPLANADE CONDO - City Comprehensive Infill Project (COMPLETED ON 03-01-10).doc
Page 2 of 8
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
PJ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is
achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
The existing lot size is only 4,350 SF and will need to be developed as a Comprehensive Infili Re-development.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
The proposed use is within the allowable density and is also compatible with the City of Clearwater Comp Plan and Future Land
Use.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
The proposed2 unit condominium will not impede the development of the surrounding properties in regard to building height,
setbacks, and site design requirements.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
No adverse affect will result due to this development. The condominium will enhance the surrounding areas & properties.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
All conditions above are met by this development. There is no re-zoning or land use change proposed on this project.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
C. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
All the above conditions are met thru the proposed Site Plan and Building Elevation plan. The only flexibility development code
requested is to allow development on the small lot area of 4,350 SF.
S:\09.BAY ESPLANADE\DOCS\BAY ESPLANADE CONDO - City Comprehensive Infill Project (COMPLETED ON 03-01 -1 0).doc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
`U/ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
d/ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
U/ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
t9/ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
F] / Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
fa/ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
/ the City manual.
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
bit- Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
?- elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) (FUILC S'
( y °r i
ta/ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; 7
Pot,
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
/ including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
a- TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees;
ICY/ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards tie. Reduce number of
spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community
Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be
used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved;
O GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; N% A-
S:\09.BAY ESPLANADE\DOCS\BAY ESPLANADE CONDO - City Comprehensive Infill Project (COMPLETED ON 03-01-10).doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
H SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
? Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
n/ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
,? All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
{per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701};
Z Location of all landscape material;
L Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
--
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
Level Two approval.
I i
d
d d
l
t
i
d
BLE f
i
ti
T itt
/t
l
f
b
CY re
, an
propose
eve
opmen
,
n wr
en
ar
orm:
ng, requ
a
u
or ex
s
SITE DATA
A
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
Land area in square feet and acres; 21 2L I ?r A,1,1 G G /; 7 G _/_r-
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use; 2_?t
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
? number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
? expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; A?
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
/Y % fIC(W
7_ VV SNQf'l-
Buildin and structure heights;
-
-
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and i G/v Kf?/1) 6 7
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. f
REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11);
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: ??? J n 1
/ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
i/Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
i/ All open space areas;
?? Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
? Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
V Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
S:\09.BAY ESPLANADE\DOCS\BAY ESPLANADE CONDO - City Comprehensive Infill Project (COMPLETED ON 03-01-10).doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
H LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
? All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
q/ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
? Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
? Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
/ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
? schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
I/ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
t/ percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
?J REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %, X 11);
i
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. f\1
I1. / BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
b BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information:
t/ All sides of all buildings
Dimensioned
L-1 Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
--
?Materials
M-' REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/2 X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
U" All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
t3/ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ?(
? Reduced signage proposal (8 '/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ?I I
S:\09.BAY ESPLANADE\DOCS\BAY ESPLANADE CONDO - City Comprehensive Infill Project (COMPLETED ON 03-01 -1 0).doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
IU/ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
¦ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
'12 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 22004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
V Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
Fire Flow Calculations/ Water Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
Signature of property owner or representative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of
rebuany , A.D. 20_1_Q_ to me and/or by
bg-yotl who is personally known has - --
produced ?rlvtr I ;c?n?a ''N36,0179 71 q-6ZO
as identification.
?? F7,RENDALIZ ALICEA
Notary blicMY COMMISSION i7Db84277
Mcommission «•t, XPIRESJune 11,'U1I
l;nv -???7nii C:\Users\CD MATHURA\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Low\Content.IE5\THZPM6SR\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD)
2008 07-11[1 ].doc
Page 8 of 8
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
MATHURA PROPERTIES #5, LLC
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
22 BAY ESPLANADE, CLEARWATER, FL 33767
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
CONDOMINIUMS - FEE SIMPLE
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: \
TUANHUYNH / j?. E (?EGt U)L L('NSULT!ti1G lC(tJ C??2 5 ?? C )
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (Itwe), the undersigne authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner Property Owner
Property Owner _ Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 2 0 day of
?p 2(D 10 personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Ddproses-and says that he/she fottyandetstandstt? contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
YPi
; '• ? 13RENDAS Z? ALICBEA
(v11' CO?,tMIS ?? ODG 7 _ .nLl(L (f1 C C?C?
. U
01- 0'' r )'SIRES June (, 101.1
Notary Public Signature
(407) 398-C." Horid3h}?tary9t:•:c? cam Commission Expires:
NTary?eaVStMy t?lj/1 _? ??' LUG/
C:\Users\CD MATHURA\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Low\Content.IE5\THZPM6SR\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD)
2008 07-11[1].doc
Page 10 of 8
I#: 2010042524 BK: 16832 PG: 154, 02/17/2010
$27.00. D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $1295.00 KEN
COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKPR03
Prepared by and
after recording return to:
Nicholas A. Campbell
Stoneburner Berry Glacker
Purcell & Greenhut, P.A.
841 Prudential Drive, Suite 1400
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
Pinellas County Parcel Identification ;t:
05-29-15-16362-008-0120
at 10:50 AM, RECORDING 3 PAGES
BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED is executed as of the day and year dated herein
below, and is made effective for conveyance as of the 161h day of February, 2010, between
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a national banking association (the "Grantor"), whose address for
purpose hereof is Real Estate Asset Sales/OREO, One Alhambra Plaza, Penthouse, Coral
Gables, Florida 33134, and MATHURA PROPERTIES 45, LLC, a Florida limited liability
company (the "Grantee'), whose address for purpose hereof is 1901 South John Young Parkway,
Suite 101, Kissimmee, Florida 34741.
WITNESSETH:
THAT GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 dollars
($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, by these presents does hereby grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release,
convey and confirm unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, the property located in
Pinellas County, Florida described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (collectively, the "Property").
TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments, easements and appurtenances
thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining;
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever;
SUBJECT TO: (i) the operation and effect of all instruments and matters shown in the
Public Records for Pinellas County, Florida, none of which shall be deemed to be re-imposed by
this instrument; (ii) any claim that any portion of the Property is sovereign land of the State of
Florida, including submerged, filled or artificially exposed lands; (iii) any encroachments,
easements, measurements, variations in area or content, party walls or other facts which a
correct survey of the Property would show; (iv) roads, ways, streams or easements, if any, not
shown by the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, riparian rights and the title to any filled-
in lands; (v) any requirement by the State of Florida for the removal of fill or other restoration of
sovereignty lands, and any lien rights which may be asserted pursuant to Chapter 403 of the
Florida Statutes; (vi) taxes for the Property not yet due and payable, including without limitation
2010 ad valorem and non-ad valorem taxes to be levied on the Property or the owner thereof; (vii)
the operation and effect of all applicable codes, laws, regulations, statutes and other restrictions
of governmental or quasi governmental authorities; (viii) any assessment due to Pinellas County,
Florida and, if applicable, any municipality assessment due to the applicable municipality as well
as any assessment due to any special taxing district; (ix) any lien provided by Chapter 159,
Florida Statutes, in favor of any city town, village or port authority for unpaid service charges for
service of water, sewer, or gas system supplying the Property; (x) liens or charges for any unpaid
hlathura-Oo% SP. Warranty Deed Page 1 of 3
PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16832 PG 155
assessments or amounts by virtue of the Ordinances and Resolutions creating any Community
Development Districts or Municipal Taxing Districts, including any amounts due upon transfer of
the Property by Grantee; and (xi) the right of the United States government arising by reason of
its control over navigable waters in the interest of navigation and commerce, as to any portion of
the Property which is (a) submerged land, or is (b) artificially filled in land, artificially exposed
land, or any land accreted thereto, in what was formerly navigable waters; and
SUBJECT TO the matters described above, Grantor specially warrants the title to the
Property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or
under Grantor, but against none other-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Special Warranty Deed, under seal,
on the day and year set forth herein below, to be effective for conveyance under the terms hereof
as of February 16, 2010.
Signed, sealed and delivered GRANTOR:
in the presence of.,
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Print Name: ?5t/pL_)4. Nr l-r
^ (SEAL)
John t. Nichols
Print me: 0 t GZI( sarl lit t5 Senior Vice President
STATE OF MARYLAND
Cre0-N3*/CITY OF BALTIMORE
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT was, executed, acknowledged, and delivered before
me, the undersigned officer, this 16th day of February, 2010, by John C. Nichols, as the Senior
Vice President of Bank of America, N.A., on behalf of the dank. He:
E is personally known to me OR
? produced a [state] driver's license as identification OR
? produced as identification-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 hereunto set my hand and official seal,
M LC '
Print Name: f_.r= ?/ . lL71--
,:[NOTl1RY SEAL] Notary Public, State of
:r
01
i KAREN M. KOCH
NOTARY PUBLIC
BALTIMORE CITY
MARYLAND
MY COMMISS1011 EXPIRES MARCH 1, 2010
Mathura-BofA SP Warranty Deed Page 2 of 3
PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16832 PG 156
EXHIBIT "A" TO DEED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
Lot 12, Block 8, REVISED MAP OF CLEARWATER BEACH, according to the map or plat
thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 5, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Mathura-BofA SP. Warranty Deed Page 3 of 3
PROJECT :
22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUM
OWNER: DEVAN MATHUR_A
ROOFING
12
4F--
z iuI i
12
PRPR STUCCO BAND ?
TEMP. GLASS
TYP.
s r, BRUSH ALUM POST
TYP.
PRE-CAST GONG.
MOULDING
STUCCO BAND
t0
5/e'STUCCO FIN.
ON. CMU WALLS
DOOR- BRUSH ALUM.
FRAMES W/
BLUE TEMP. GLASS
TYP.
a
PRE-CAST CONC.
MOULDING
.? DESIGNS INC_
TEL. (407) 344-4122
South Elevation
Iz
4F--
.D DESIGNS INC_
TEL. (407) 344-4122
PROJECT :
22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUM
OWNER: DEVAN MATHURA
TILE ROOFING
North elevation
PROJECT :
22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUM
OWNER: DEVAN MATHURA
TILE ROOFING
ROOF BEARING
STUCCO BAND-
., TEMP. GLASS
TYP.
BRUSH ALUM POST--
TYP.
3RD. FLOOR LIVING-
FIRE -CAST CONC
MOULDING
STUCCO BANS
5/a'STUCCO FIN.
4 ON. CMU WALLS
DOOR- BRUSH ALUM.
FRAMES W1
BLUE TEMP. GLASS
TYP.
2ND. FLOOR LIVING
PRE-CAST CONS
MOULDING
15T. FLOOR PARKING
EE FRE__
Ell ------ LE 1101
Y % Y. fG q q %
n r, z a -. n x ss
w
.D DESIGNS INC_ East E1-c Va.t1o1Z
TEL. (407) 344-4122
PROJECT :
22 BAY ESPLANADE CONDOMINIUM
OWNER: DEVAN MATHURA
TILE ROOF
8
N STUCCO BAN
Y
' ®® ®® ®®
REVEAL
2
x
PRE-CAST CONC.
MOULDING
to
v STUCCO BAND
%'STUCCO FIN.
ON. CP'IU WALLS
r,
i0
PRE-CAST CONC.
MOULDING
100D DESIGNS INC_
TEL. (407) 344-4122
,West Elevation
15' FRONT BUILDING SETB ACK LIP
20'x 20' VISIBILITY TRIAN GLE -
(SHADED AREA)
265 SF OF NEW SIDEWALK CONCRETE
PAVERS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON
WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE
MINIMUM 6' THICK FIBROUS CONCRETE AND
MINIMUM 3000 PSI WITH 6'. 6' 110 x 10 W.W.M. PER
:ITV OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS
AND STANDARDS INDEX 4 iG3, PAGE 212 m ' .,
U
•
1
?O
w?
TWO
2
SO
ID W
STE C
T
I
'ti •
(
)
L
A
ON
A
NERS (BLACK COLOR) _
FOR EACH CONDO UNIT (PRIVATE RESIDENTS) .
'i
Z
70 SF OF NEW SIDEWALK CONCRETE
PAVERS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
1O'FRONTLANDS
-
CAPE
' x 20' VISIBILITY TRIANGLE S
HADEDAREA)
FRONT BUILDING SETBACK LINE -
SITE 100-YEAR BASE FLOOD ELEVATION = 12.0 NGVD
PER FIRM MAP #12103CO102G (EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 3.2003)
F SWTN
SQ/TN
E MF7+
MpTM
yr
i
N
I DRIVE AISLE WIDI
a b'
1W ---{? 24.7-
,
1 f°
FOUR (4) PARKING SPACES
6' THICK CONCRETE
(BOTTOM FLOOR)
-PROPERTY LINE
SIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MEASURED TO THE FACE OF CURB. UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. BUILDING PLANS LAYOUT SHOWN ON THE CIVIL SITE BANS ARE FOR REFERENCE
PURPOSES ONLY. CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING FOUNDATION
SHALL BE PER THE ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING PLANS EXACT DIMENSIONS
3. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3 FEET AND NEASURE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS.
4. ANY DISCREPANCES BETWEEN FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND THESE CONSTRUCTION
PLANS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
5. FINISH CONCRETE WALKWAY AND TOP OF CURB ELEVAT10N SHALL BE r ABOW
FINISH PAVEMENT GRADES.
6. ALL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CONTROLS SHOWN ARE IN REFERENCE TO
SURVEY PROPERTY CMNERS AND BENCHMARKS AND SHALL BE VERIFED BY THE
CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
.
7. THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE
HEIGHT OF T - T. WHICH INCLUDES ENTRANCES. ROUTE. PARKING SPACES.AND EXIT
PER FLORIDA BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 114 6.5.
8. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. BUILDING PLANS MUST DEMONSTRATE
PROPOSED SEA TURTLE-FRIENDLY LIGHTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY CODE (CDC
SECTION 3IM2) AND STATE IAW IF A. C. 628-55). NOLKHTWT(HIN300FEETSHALLBE
VISIBLE OR EXTEND IN AREAS IDENTIFIED AS SEA TURTLE NESTING AREAS DURING THE
NESTING SEASON OF MAY 1 TO OCTOBER 31. AREAS WHERE SECURITY AND PUBLIC SAFETY
REQUIRE LIGHTING. ALTERNATIVE LIGHT MANAGEMENTAPPROACHES SHALL BEAPPLED
aRAPM W.=
1rLe>
xr-s•
SITE DATA:
1. PROJECT AREA: 4,350 SF (0.10AC.)
2. PARCEL ID: 05.20-1616382-008-0120 (PINEUASCO. PROPERTY APPRAISER)
3. SITE ADDRESS' 22 BAY ESPLANADE, CLEARWATER, FL 33767
4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION' LOT 12, BLOCK 8. PLAT BOOK 11. 6 PAGE 5 OF PINELLAS COUNTY
5. LAND OWNER: MATHURA PROPERTIES 45. LLC
6. EXISTING ZONING: TOURIST DISTRICT (T) (PER CITY OF CLEARWATER ZONING)
7. PROPOSED ZONING' TOURIST DISTRICT( T)
IL LAND USE RESORT FACILITIES HIGH (RFH)
9. PROPOSED USE: CONDOMINIUM (2 UNITS- FEE SIMPLE OWNERSHIP)
10. EACH UNIT FLOOR AREA: 2,170 SF (35x 67 FOOTPRINT- LIVING AREA ON HIE 8 31d FLOOR)
11. GROSS FLOOR AREA (GFA): 4,340 SF (TOTAL UNDER AC -TWO UNITS)
12. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR)' 0.888 (4.340 SF GFA)14.350 SF LOT AREA)
13. BUILDING HEIGHT' 30 FEET (MEASURED FROM 2W FLOOR LIVING AREA TO ROOF)
14. PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS: SETBACK TO FACE OF BUILDING
FRONT: 15' (BAY ESPLANADE PUBLIC RIW)
SIDE (WEST); 10' (EXISTING MOTEL)
SIDE (EAST): 5' (EXISTING HESS GAS STATION)
REAR: IT (EXISTING VACANT LOT)
15. POST DEVELOPMENT IMPERWOUS AREA 2,530 SF 158.2%OF SITE)
BUILDING ROOF: 2,170 SF
CONCRETE d PAVEMENT: 360 SF
2,SWSF
16. PROPOSED OPEN SPACES (GRASSY. 1,820 SF (41.8 %OF SITE)
17. ON-SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM' UNDERGROUND STORM TECH CHAMBERS
18. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: 12 FEET (1JGVD) (PER FIRM MAP 1210MOI02G DATED 09-03-03)
19. PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 4SPACES (REWIRED 4 SPACES- TWO SPACES PER UNIT)
20. PREVIOUS SITE USAGE & STRUCTURES ON-SITE: RENTAL COTTAGES (NOW VACANT)
ITE AVERAGE DAILY TRIP GENERATION:
1. RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUIWTOWNHOUSE OWELUNG UNIT): MCODE 230
2. ITE RATE: STRIPS PER DWELLING UNIT
3. TURNING MOVEMENT RATE: SD%IN 850%OUT
4. PROPOSED USAGE'. TWO (2) DWELLING UNITS
5. TOTAL DAILY TRIPS GENERATED= 6 x 2 DWELLING UNITS=12 TRIPS IS IN 66 WTI
III 14rt ? AIY r/r4Yr.?s1Y Mf GV\1 CGrLJVYVJG
FL V 'I[)Ok jm wr
«o-r rr rs?T-RSSrras?rar 41r. F BdO PLANE AK's ?E•? r
r-Fr_r w 1r?arvrl?-r+ss?rHS4r 1rEPLAN 4%0!T r•• r-?
leer 1 rsrr4lr
..aT mow, c r r.•. Cm CF C MMATM eeAa4 MOM ?a°i?I In?els? ?
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTYLENGI
87' -
S SIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER LINE
\ - ? ALONG EAST 8 WEST SIDE
NEW BUILDING LENGTH FOOT
?2 G NORTH SIDE BUILDING FACE SETBACK LINE (DASHED)
Dd 8 3rd FLOOR LIVING AREAS
F SIDE GARAGE STRUCTURE
SETBACK(TYP.)
7.33' WIDE x 1033' LENGTH ELEVATOR
AREA (OUTSIDE DIMENSIONS)
EAR ACCESS DOOR
•10' REAR BUILDING SETBACK LINE
r--5' WIDE x 36 LENGTH
IS
z STAIRWAY ACCESS
AREA ATTACHED 3
j O TO BUILDING
] w M?j
J I O
- F REAR LANDSCAPE
BUFFER LINE
,10' REAR BUILDING SETBACK LINE
T SOUTH SIDE GARAGE STRUCTURE &
BUILDING FACE SETBACK LINE
2nd & 3rd FLOOR LIVING AREAS
EXISTING 12' OAK TREE CANOPY
AREA LIMITS (12' RADIUS)
GRAPEW 90=
FT SIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER LINE
ALONG EAST & WEST SIDE
VO IRNw)
`' t r . 11 a
8 PROPERTY LINE (P/L) y O
i 10
?.
20' x 20' VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
(SHADED AREA)
S? PROPERTY LINE (PIL)
PROPERTY LINE (P/L) fl ----___--_ SOI? EAR LANDSCAPE MW RARE m?
TTER LINE
6
lGEE OAOM KTAL
N /110D SOD
10'FRONT LANDSCAPE j
BUFFER LINE (il
\ / f5'SIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER LINE
ALONG EAST 8 WEST SIDE
20'x 20' VISIBLITV TRIANGLE
(SHADED AREA) PROPERTY LINE (P/L)
EXISTING 12' OAK TREE A
CANOPY AREA LIMITS
(12 FT. RADIUS) ???? TINGE RAt11RM GEtM
GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES
1. ALL KAMM W ME ROMA NO, t. OR RETIRE At SIMMONS O@R VRAM AO
STANDARDS PDR MRw1v PLAM7L PART 111183
D ?ART SD111 a LROA
0E1M1MF1S OF
ANWGL71NNr, ruLANA>I _.IANO A?r ALOC)ol_ naa)a
: ALL TRSS AID PIMfT W7[RAL sell GEl7
N ACOOOMIGE NTM M
lDSIG110O 0^NROD N M STAR DEPARIIOR OF AYSOLMI E AND ODOSOI
"SM
. CCIOL NI M. 'IM PIORCnOI MMSAL RE RADDVE AO
a M LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR CALLED
FOR ON INE
PLANT LIST w°? oeeAAPE REMMXME
PLANE '"" uT ALL OF PLANT ?auwnn= A=WAAWAM NS PLANS `NA L
GE USED M A GNOE ONLY. IT A VMWAION OMM GEIIQN M PLANS AND M OWIML
D'TY. 9714 SO'GIN'AL MAZE COMMON NAME SME NAlE1R A RANT LINT, TNE
ALL IRML M NO ((OyyLO?/D OWAM WALL L ME RAN= Lw0 A nL MMRNE
111F73 6 M LAIDSI',ME C070121CR SALL M AO[OMA MMRCAL WWAOC M ALL
t V IADFA3IROE)NA dDRSA elm Y7RRE 1r; 2' CAI. SAN RANT NEW AND P ANIQt KRDOAL DRUM THROM ANY DOPACRD PILL 10
NAmc SGE s4ML GE AadPLSeD 10 AID
o11ANANL
L ALL PLANT NEDS AND TREE M1WM BANNS 24ALL GE TOP D NH TRINES
?wY WINLNNEDOED C1 - MIML
7. NO ,RQ GE PLANTED CLOVER MAN 3 FEET (» FROM M NOW Q M10OIT
yq?g
W ALLOS ADWAATE OEE RGN PROEC1104 .
S PTV LiI104PORI IM TONRA VAR PITTS 24924•'. 30' OC MODERATE L LANDSCAPE OOTRACIOR OWL GE TROLLY RESOS FOR SAO)TT AND PISS
CONDITION Cr ALL TREES AND DOLL GE LLSMLY TARE FOR ANY DAMAGE GAINED
1S VD 1BUIOIIIY ODORA71591MIIY Sim YELRIRMIAI 30rXW', 30' OC MODERATE By M SWARM OF ATY PLANT MATERIAL
L ALL uO AREAS TO GEmK SOD SALL GE OWED POLNMQ 10 slILN1 NOO AID
ORAN® 10 ESARM A LEKL PSw4 LADE. ALL 00? TO GE X1010 11101
SOD AREA SI L BE AROEEIIIE ISANSA 1a Sim am
OD !ALL R MQ a• tEIDt AND PQR R sALi GE LID cA11ir AID
11114 1MMT R1WM A1NTL M SOD WALL CONTAIN MOST 1O Slgl D? IMT ?ALL
MART ON REM 701 lilm. ALL MGT NOT PAM ON oRwtw lAlttlglO
WALL GE SOMM SOD 94ALL GE AR SINTI E 11,400A ON 01AIL
11. ALL LAIDSI.M[ MEIN 70 GE I MARD VEIN AN A4VTCIATIC 1RDDUORO SOOL
VEIN LOGE ODLVRAGE. SAOOIDS PRE7VT1011. L RAN SESSION DrAM
Or= WAY WAN AMr /ROY IIrT MA AREAS MD PAVED RRPAm
IL 1MMEE Now IN DI AIOR TERMS SPEOPED ENSN A$L ATA 1Q D2) wo AWK GRAIL
)? NrNRL nR RpN OnSt bom DN ddzft- &YlsA IR.>R AyS SOME q ww
AT?T =W OWSRo RSS Gi W\1 EWLA MX KAIWENOO4ASN1 IRIOn SIT
mw SIX N-EFW w ?Ir-ASSOVENiSw NE SrL LS FNAT Ey?y PL AM MwOO MRwn
LANDISCAPE w IWa1[M!?-wwrT?I44FFI TNNL PLM
PFMIAMNW L
Rssi =0 P•S
Nww?
?* NM-M N.W r.E? CRT OF CLEARWATER BEACH FLOFMA °ii ii a ws .AGE, s•?
I
A
?r
i
I --
..
?M ? U MN olZ f'?*M_
GoNr o I-?
WA*,x41&Y' VWa-
XYL11?1 4?11(l??? -
MORO WGWAWi w
ri??v ?u?? ???r
,I?
NOW Lorr hegli&
L _ _ . _
D Ih
W44,
r pie i
i
,tea