Loading...
SGN2004-04016; FLD2004-04025SGN2004-04016; FLD2004-04025 521 GULFVIEW BLVD S ENTRADA u Planning nt _° Clea~ater 10o south anus > Clearwater lorida 337 ' Fax:7 27-re~~727~~-5pp6~~2-4567 ~ b~ U Z7R.'1~tL7. ~...~~.... DATE ~ C ~i.-~_-.~..~~ ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLI ATION O SUBMIT ONE (1 }COPY OF THE FOLDED PLANS {see C and D below) O SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 30030000 Supplement to CASE #: SGN ~ ~-_ Cj ~,~~ DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM APPLICATION (Revised 10!10!2003) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT GENERAL PRINC/PEES: The intent of the Comprehensive Sign Program is to provide private property owners and businesses with flexibility to develop innovative, creative and effective signage and to improve the aesthetics of the City of Clearwater. This program provides an a/temative to minimum standard signage subject to flexibility criteria which ensure that signage wit! not have an adverse impact on the aesthetics, community character and quality of life of the City of Clearwater. A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-1001) PROJECT ADDRESS: ~ZI GU(-FV~it# '1~L-V.(1+ APPLICANT NAME: Oi"z~~OF` P1~Oi?E~TI~ ~ OTC-r~D~ G(3L~Ul~I ~IO'~EL, (~Q'(' ~~~$ MAILING ADDRESS: 2`~0 ~/~~`~' ~{~ I7e\VE G~4>.i2.ttl~.T~iZ ~L , 3377 ~. :. PHONE NUMBER: ! ~-! ~'i~a I L~ Z) FAX NUMBER: ~b 2 ~22. g `1 ~ -1 PROPERTY OWNER(S): ~GAO~ +~ ~-FV11rt~t,.f i-iyT~l PAi~ct~t~QS L(' ,JK C,l' ~fl/1~.t+Cd l~L.~. (Must include ALL owners) J E~E~e-~~ x ~ ~~Q. c~i~~~- PRA-~D~~rv~ C~ P AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) t~/~ MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: "-' Check if AGENT is Contractor ^ Sign Contractor Name: ~ ~~ State License `, ~_ ~.~ ,; _.. _ t i ; - ._ _, .r, B/. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) (,-'~" ` ~ ;~ "~ ~ ® SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY (included herein in subsection Fl A TT d c u ~ ~ C. SIGN PLAN AND ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Sections 4-1001 and 4-202.A.23) l~ SIGN PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ All dimensions; _ Bar scale and date prepared; Detailed, colored drawing(s) of all proposed signs including: height, area, text/copy, materials and colors; _ Calculations used to determine area and height of all signs; _ Details of all existing signs on parcel (indicate if existing signs are to remain with this proposal) including height, dimensions and area; _ Illumination details including type, placement, intensity and hours of illumination, and area of signs to be illuminated. ,~ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of buildings with proposed and existing attached signage including fagade direction, height dimensions, colors and materials. (Color rendering of each fagade with signage as proposed.) Page 1 of 4 -Comprehensive Sign Program Application -City of Clearwater D. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-1001 & Section 202} SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ All dimensions; _ North arrow; _ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _ Location map; _ Footprint and size of all buildings and structures; _ All required five foot setbacks as measured from property line; _ All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; _ Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; _ Lot frontage on all street rights-of-way; _ Location of all freestanding (including directional) signs proposed and existing (indicate whether to be removed); _ Location of all attached signs, proposed and existing (indicate whether to be removed). DATA TABLE for existina, permitted, and proposed signs and development, in writtenltabular form: _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Lot frontage on all street rights-of-way; _ Square-footage of building facades facing adjacent street rights-of-way; _ Number and area of attached signs on parcel; _ Number and area of freestanding signs on parcel. E. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-1807.C) Signage proposed as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program may deviate from the minimum sign standards in terms of numbers of signs per business or parcel of land, maximum area of sign face per parcel of land and the total area of sign faces per business or parcel of land, subject to compliance with the flexibility criteria outlined below. Monument signs, pursuant to Sections 3-1806.8. i.g and 3-18068.2 shalt not be eligible for this program. As part of the program, all sign types (freestanding, attached, windows, interior site directional, etc.) shall be reviewed for the business and/or the development parcel to achieve compliance in so far as possible with these current regulations. A master sign program for shopping centers, including a/! out parcels, and office complexes shall include all types of signs for at/ tenants/uses within the development parcel. These will be reviewed as a Comprehensive Sign Program application. A!l existing and proposed signs must be architecturally integrated into the design of the building and/or site using similar and coordinated design and style features, materials and colors, etc. Attached signs shall be horizontally and vertically proportionately located on each fagade with no protrusions above roof lines, over windows, trim, cornices or other building features. D Provide complete responses to the COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM CRITERIA including how the criteria are met: 1. Architectural Theme. The design, character, location and/or materials of all freestanding and attached signs proposed in a comprehensive sign program shall be demonstrably more attractive than signs otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum signs standards. All signs must be architecturally integrated into/with the design of the building and/or site using similar and coordinated design features, materials and colors, etc. '~IG,t1S At~~ PRoI'OSFD `1"o FjuNAt~tC~ t3(,jtL_~1NP~ C(-~d~1~ACT>~2. rBlbUt_~151At.17 MEDcr. 1J 1'j N wi4 taT ~~~T I,c~fC , C~ l,~ C_-~ AfVT 5'Co NE ~ L tLE '~ (~ Aia f? uae V t..4 tN~a~-~ t~ _.~CCE NT L.IL->•1 ~" t3t)T STtt.t. ~XP~t&S~' C_DP.k'.13~A,NS3 AND P-~YLT PLAYF et_hl~ 2. Height. The height of all freestanding signs proposed through the Comprehensive Sign Program shall relate to the design of the sign and shall not exceed 14 feet in height. ~'~t~T~O SIGK (Zees Harr ~xceo~ to' 3. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Sign Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. G~Lt., Std I,IS Ai? ~ t_tG~T~ la Page 2 of 4 -Comprehensive Sign Program Application -City of Clearwater ,~ 4. Total Area of Sign Faces. Height, Area, Number and Location of Signs. The height, area, number and location of signs permitted through the Comprehensive Sign Program shall be determined by the Community Development Coordinator based on the following criteria: overall size of site, relationship between the building setback and sign location, frontage, access and visibility to the site, intended traffic circulation pattern, hierarchy of signage, scale and use of the project, and submittal of a master sign plan for the development parcel/project. Additionally, the maximum permitted sign area shall be based on the following formula when evaluated against the above criteria: i. Attached signs -The maximum area permitted for attached signage shall range from one percent up to a maximum of six percent of the building fagade to which the sign is to be attached. ii. Freestanding signs -The maximum permitted area of all freestanding signs on a site shall not exceed the range of sign area permitted by the street frontage or building facade calculation methods set forth in Section 1806.B.1.c.i. and ii. ~"~Tde}~~t~ ~R~ ttuss `T°NAN 3% eF FAcA4iL ~~2.Fr~c>v ~~ S Td n ~ 1 NC7 5 (Gc4 1s 'R~~ta~ ~~t? °Ta BL.D ~ ~"T'Yl,.~ 5. Community Character. The signage proposed in the Comprehensive Sign Program shall not have an adverse impact on the community character of the City of Clearwater. `T~i-fC Ct~cvrBtNCtJ ~FP-ofzTS c~F '~LDFr rn~YEtztx~.,~ ANA T~xzUR~s , L,~b.IC~C11<f F , ~T"Rf~x~'SG4P~ ~~(V L-iT~ SIGN ~N4-jANGt~ 7t-{€ CatvtwtUt~lCt„~R-~~'YI~K~ 6. Property Values. The signage proposed in the Comprehensive Sign Program will not have an adverse impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ~c G~ S wt T ~( t~ TN ~ D~t1 Ede PM t~ a`C~" ~ !zo ~ d2.A. M S tA°c~D i NC ~'~c~.sfv a~ 6~dt.~U~S t,utT6l C1dat-iTi'" 7. Elimination of Unattractive Signage. The signage proposed in a Comprehensive Sign Program will result in the elimination of existing unattractive signage or will result in an improvement to the appearance of the parcel proposed for development in comparison to signs otherwise permitted under the minimum sign standards. u~ ~ t r,~- wt ra t y~'~lN G Cv-rz Pvt~T'~- 1 Q 'EN`[1 ~ Y A PPI=-~. I~ A fJC t~ ~s tLrV l~ ~ 1 ~ Piie-~tl E 8. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The signage proposed in the Comprehensive Sign Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. ~~ B€Vi~~'~ ~'RvJ~`CT ~A ~T~ StGNA6E wtt,V -~sre~BC~S 7"(-(~ ~,©~'~'i-t ~-cJC'FU1~ ~2tU'~ l'Wl/~C~F- 1G11t~'1'~-oi~~Wt~t~t.`i•' Page 3 of 4 -Comprehensive Sign Program Application -City of Clearwater r.13r ~ ~, ~~~HJ 1 : H~ _ 941 X574151 ialLI~T? R'3'~~C _-.a .~v'iti1J1 1 First Amerman Tale Insurance ComPanY Schedule A ~Catntinuatl~ ISSUIng Offi~ File NC.: 3~OB,p.T ~~/P1~/.GE E~3 n R~. C.~f y~.~ ~T~ A survey and dr-tn Of a Oe+'~! of land In SackiOn 1r T a: fattovws: owrsih~ Zg a0~$h, Wn~ 15 E, fe+rth+ar daip~ribed From the Narthwegtpr}y edrner of Cat 1, 61ock C of Page 36 of the Public Racards of a N~ $aystdt gubdlvisivn Nra. 5 as recorded rn Plat Ebok 31a, fart along the 5o~herly line ~' Gutfr~8o~rard fOr~j Pot i~Of ba (nNr'xth 54 dap. 15'30" Went 65.1 day. 25'3iJ" West abng said Sovthtarly tl+ne of Gulfvlcw p ~r thsriat Continue North S~ ~ Cot 43 In aoufavard, 467,7q feet to thQ Norcheazterly cOrr~r Lloyd-Whlte•5kinrter Subc$viaiat as recard4ld in Plat t3oe;c i3, ~~ 12 ~ ~e public kecOrdt of PMnNtas County, Ptorid~-; thence run fouth 35 aep. 34'30" West 400.00 feet Eo the bWkherd tine; *.henoa South 54 dtQ, 253t)" Ea3t 316,13 het; ttww~ce atang a curve to the tuft, radius 534.3Q f 223.63 feet, chord txartrsy Soctth 65 decj. 52'4S° East, chard 212.21 fb11C; ~ Spy 77 ~ arc E»st 81.3$ fbat; thence North l2 deg, 40't}0' Lelt 352,56 fegt Co the Faint of X0.20'00 ~'gM~i• RANADA INN GlJt.FVIEW H$a 2 Ftk we.: 3~tf60-T ~ • N c of t N STUCGD ~ SToI•!e 'T(t.lM ~~GH~eD ~ NTRaDA ~ IG FBI VGR~G.~ BI.aG. GQ~S"f TYr~ t'L.AC~U~ gROti(L'E 2`X2' Ma~NTE'D L.ICaN'C~ ~ G SIGN l 4" X s =~" LEITE~- ON Aul~11NG hIRECt1ol4~LL { 1,fF'02MA~TID 1`~ S lf~N $'f:A~H PA¢tuNGi ~ i~ol taw I csN'tRY 5 ~4 N Q'[TACHSD SIGN - }IoTEL Modt,C~NG Q C~ToNE cReST C~7 cYn>r~rzt nTrarz+rnrz+~r ~snr£r~~ars ~~ vvva~a.i vv~-rs.ver a~vva~a~r~asw CZErb~,4~y SIGN ~~ ,-7 U7 F- i lu fR Lfl e-i ~i' f'^- lt rn r, ~~ Q v .-, '7 a cr w.. cr --. v m _1 r m W r,~ Q ~~>~I L BIPG. t~~.AE.ag`.'~Gti _,__ 1 - ~` a una uca ~~ ~~ n v 0 ~r, d E- w J J f-e t~ r-~ U~ V r-- ~ti rn .7 ,~ 7 9 V ~:7 SY C`a ~O C'J °.. 'cY 6'1 1E1~1.J-. • ;YG{.ii"YI..L~.~E NOM. ~~{b 03i23i04 12:07 DECAD~ H0l_IDAY INN ~ N(7.005 D02 ~.~_ f: AP'FIdAVIT TO AuTHCAtZE A~i~NT/AT~`$&TING TO CiNN~RR$N(P: ~C~de $actlon 4 202,1 ~ Decade Guit°eoast Hatel Partners Limited Partnership (84°I Tenant-in-Conm~ton) ,`~, JK Guifview LLC (16% T,~ an -; CrxrHrtnn ~ (Names of as property ot+rners un - pteaae~AlM" felt ttamee) '"""" "'` .. ~t {I e~ ere) trte a-vner(a) and record Ntla hhc~tdar(ej of the fattattitrtp deaarided property {ttcler~a or ti~stltt loctslion): 521 Gul~~t;i~ew BI' . , G1 p~ ,_„~,ti~i_da _. 2. That this propariy wnetltutas the prop®rty for which A rattueul ter a: (dosaAbe requeal) a. Iltat the undaratgned (ttasRravs} appointed a,~d (doaeldo}appblgt: Jeffrey Keierleber as {hishhelr} ~-gant(s) to w~ewte any petiti~8 or other documents rtaeeaeAry tp Btteet Such pe~tlan; a. That trtis aiNda~t has been execVted to induce Nth Clty of Gleerwratbf, AtOMdA to cor-sider ~irn! ~~:t on the above daacgtflrKt tfroueity: 5. n,at sits ~teita m the property are necessary by Ctry represrntattvea in order to a thka eppliCatton and the owner AUttlori2es City ''Qbre6er~tSUV89 b9 Vltrlt aAd ~1otOgraph thB property t'168C/Iti6d A'1 bite APJ>ItCAttOn; 6. 7r~t (klwe}, the u+tQeraigned authority, heresy c4rtlfY that the toregang IS true eau to b~ t of m~y/our knawtr~e. Decad Gu fc a ~/tel Partners Limited Partrta . ... ~'~ r P `--~- Jet K er a er, President ~~:Y . ~~~ CARCN-YN J. SHEETS MY COMMISSION # DD 063011 j 5~~~ ~F ~'~i~~]~A~ ~, a, EXPIRES: November 24,2005 I :R~ Bonded Thru Notary Public Undenrrfters j Cour+rrv o>^ P1N~t..t..AS BaRonz mo tna underalgnad, pn att-icer duty oomrMsslonad the lows of the State of Florida, a~ t11IA~ ~ ~ r ~ ~y ~ March • 2004 personalty appeared ~g Keier o htaMg ease frrat dory satteorn Domes andand axeys that he/she fuNy .uu!Idar~standa Me con~1~~-t the aftt~`-ctavlt ihat h sh~; ~ Ca~tsrtlSSton ~sptr44: _~, „~ DDET„ ry Public '~'~~~" ~ pF `. „bar 240200:? Luc Underwriters .. 5; IO/pinning DePaginerrNAAP~lcafbn F~Af ~'avilwtt:omrDr~yne~vp 9~n Piogrem 20A4.ariv Page 4 of ~ - C:pr»prahsnslvri Aigr1 f°+vpram Applltretlpn ~. G~RN of Ciearwatmr C Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 11:40 AM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry; Elliott, Gayle Subject: Comprehensive Sign Program - 521 S. Gulfview Blvd. Keith - A time extension to submit a Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) was granted at the applicant's request and given until August 15, 2007, to submit the CSP. It is now September 4, 2007, and no CSP application has been submitted. Could you please advise as to when such application will be filed with us? If not soon, enforcement action will be initiated. Additionally, there was a CSP filed April 27, 2004, at the same time as the FLD case for the Entrada project (SGN2004- 04016). This application was deemed incomplete, with a letter sent to Jeffrey Keierleber on September17, 2004. We are going to show this application as withdrawn in our files and allow the money submitted under that application to be used for the new CSP application soon to be filed. Therefore, no application fee will be necessary for the new CSP application. Thanks Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.comj Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 8:14 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Thompson, Neil Subject: Re: 521 S. Gulfview Blvd. Wayne, I called Chris Sullivan on July 31, 2007 looking for the sign details. He advised me that he spoke with Neil regarding needing a little more time and a two week extension was granted. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <keith@keithzayac.com> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 7:29 AM Subject: 521 S. Gulfview Blvd. Keith - On July 19, 2007, a letter signed by Steven D. Cooper of Decade Properties was delivered to our office to induce the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the southern hotel tower under Building Permit #BCP2006-12289. This letter indicated a Comprehensive Sign Program would be filed with our office by you no later than August 1, 2007. As of this date, no such Comprehensive Sign Program has been submitted. Could you please update me as to the status of such Comprehensive Sign Program application? Wayne ~~ ~~t~~~ - ~,.. ,.. September 17, 2004 Decade Prat~erties 240 Bayside Drive Clearwater_ FL 33767 CITY OF CLE~RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT IVIIJNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727} 562-4576 VVW W. MYCLEARWATER. COM RE: Comprehensive Sign Program - SGN2004-04016 - 521 S Gulfview Blvd -Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Jeffrey Keierleber: The Planning Staff is reviewing the Comprehensive Sign Program application separate from your Flexible Development application. The Flexible Development application will include a condition of approval regazding approval of the Comprehensive Sign Program prior to issuance of permits. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1 Provide sign plan for each sign as required on the Comprehensive Sign Program application letter'C'. 2 Provide sign data table for each sign as required on the Comprehensive Sign Program application letter D'. 3 Maximum height allowable for a monument sign in the Tourist zoning district is 6 feet, per section 3-1807.C.2. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne. Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ~a rte. M ~ CJ~iP,P., Wavn~ Wells. AICP Planner III i~''~~~~ ,~~~~~~"~~ ~~1-_ Conditions Associated With ~.~, ~. '`'~ "' `~ ~' SGN2004-04016 ~~; ' 521 S GULFVIEW BLVD -I~~TE~-`;,,, NEED SURIf~"''P"' Wayne Wells 562-4504 09/17/2004 Need survey to verify location of sign and to determine the lot widths}. Not Met NEED LANDSCAPE PLAN Wayne Wells 562-4504 09/17/2004 Need landscape plan. Not Met ZONING CONDITION Wayne Wells 562-4504 09/17/2004 Provide sign plan for each sign as required on the Comprehensive Sign Program application letter Not Met 'C'. 09/1712004 Provide sign data table for each sign as required on the Comprehensive Sign Program application Not Met letter'D'. 09/17/2004 Maximum height allowable for a monument sign in the Tourist zoning district is 6 feet, per section Not Met 3-1807.C.2. Print Date: 09/17/2004 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1