The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-07078FLD2005-07078 665 BAY ESPLANADE Date Received: 07/29/2005 NEPENTHE ZONING DISTI~;ICT: T LAND USE: ~~]E'H ATLAS PAGE: 25 PLANNER OF R T CLWCoverSheet °_ Clea~ater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE 1 205.00 ~ _ ~ , m , c casE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 04-OS-05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Robert Pennock 8 Paul Kellev MAILING ADDRESS: 665 Bav Esplanade Clearwater, FL. 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727-441-1475 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Melodie A. Ferguson Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, Robert M. Pennock 11 Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, Paul & Tracey Kellev (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Keith E. Zavac P.E. RLA MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Rd E, Ste 404, Safety Harbor, FL. 34695 ~..__ PHONE NUMBER: T27-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 -- < ~~--~~ ~ CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 665 8 667 Bav Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached survey (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 05l29N5/54756J077J0060 05J29H5/54756/007J0070 _.w. PARCEL SIZE: 0 52 acres 22 895.86 SF (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 12 Multi -Family condominium Units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) __ ~~~ ~, e DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attachment A for requests Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED} SITE PLAN? YES X NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents} C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP {see page 6) D. O 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL- REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attachment B for responses to items 1-6 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. _. 5. _~ The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for developme#~t. -~ c.~'B ~,..~ 6. e 3 c~ a The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ^ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: °° ~ 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. ~„_`~ See attachment C for response to application flexibility criteria ~ ~ Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. w ~...u_ ' f.."k y.~.r 10. t} The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 ~ applicable ~. Use separate sheets as necessary. ~.~ j ~, y ~~ ~ ~ :~ s'.~e,,, .~ r Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- Gity of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance witl the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemptio° to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; _ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; _ Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. _ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. O COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: {Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY {including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip Tines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ~ G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"}: _ All dimensions; _ North arrow; ~~ _ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ~f° l _ Location map; _ _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; r ~ _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ' Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; _ All required setbacks; , _ All existing and proposed points of access, ° _ All required sight triangles; _ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _ Location of all public and private easements; - Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; -~ ~.~. b Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; - Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ^ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; _ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; - Official records book and page numbers of ail existing utility easement; _ Building and structure heights; _ impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and _ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ^ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 YZ X 11) and color rendering if possible; ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; _ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; - All open space areas; _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; _ Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such tress. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN: _ All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _ Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; _ Proposed and required parking spaces; _ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, spec cations and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; _ location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; - Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; - Interior landscaping areas hatched andJor shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; - Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); - Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) (color rendering if possible}; ^ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ' ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. landscape associated with the Comprehensive ~ - Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be me~t,~ 6 ` "~ C' ~ a,` .~ t Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Inflll Application 2005- City of Clearwater , , I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ^ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/z X 11 } (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'h X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of `` "` A.D. 20 to me and/or by ~, who is personally known has ~ $ _., produced as identification. .3 ~N i Notary public, . ~' ~ ;a My commission ex~re~; ~} ( ,. + .~ ~_-- } ....._J i ,~«.. m,..... .,,_...._. .. ..... .... ....... _........ .. I Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ '" • AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed -please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE~<.AS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that helshe fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: Notary Public ~°r S: Planning OepartmentW pplication Forms~devetopment reviewtflexible development comprehensive mfill dp~bc3t~pt}.2005.doca-- ? ; i ,p .,. E ~I - _x~ ~, _. i . ;_ Page 7 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater # ~" ATTACHMENT A DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • Re-submittal of approved site plan to add additional property and expand project. • Transfer of density from off-site property. • Reduce west front pavement setback from I S feet to 0 feet. • Reduce west rear wood deck setback from 20 feet to 0 feet minimum. • Reduce north side setback from 10 feet to 9.21 feet to pavement. • Increase building height from 35 feet to 65 feet (FEMA to roof slab). ATTACHMENT B GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulb coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent properties. The proposed project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach with the proposed Mediterranean architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain the small-scale multi-family character of the neighborhood. The project does not deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed 12 condominium units. The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The parking is fully enclosed underneath the building, and the existing on-street parking is being removed. The building height request is 65 feet from FEMA to the top of the roof slab which is in general concurrence with the current City workshop meetings and past approved projects. The impervious area coverage of the site is limited to a 0.69 ISR which is well below the allowable 0.95 ISR. The density of the project is 12 units, which is also well under the allowable 15.6 units (30 unitslacre). The 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of other properties on Bay Esplanade, and set a positive example for the redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by the development of the project. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The 12 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and is under the 7.5 units/ acre density allowed. There are no proposed uses other than residential that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. ~. 4,~.; 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion ~` The parking is designed within a fully enclosed parking garage that is accessed by one 24-foot wide driveway. There is no proposed on street parking associated with the project. The proposed 24 parking spaces exceed the required 18 parking spaces required by code. ~... b w ~ ,~ - ., ,. w ,, ,,.. n S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The surrounding parcels along Bay Esplanade are primarily multi-family apartment developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity by conforming with Mediterranean flavor suggested by City code. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. The project minimizes the acoustic and olfactory impacts of the project in several ways. The first is removing the existing on-street parking and replacing it with a fully enclosed parking garage underneath the residences to minimize noise or parked cars along the roadway. There is no proposed on-street or off-street surface parking proposed as part of this project. Next, there will be no commercial, retail or office space within the project therefore hours of operation impacts will not be applicable. Finally, the areas of congregation are limited to the pool deck which is located in the center/rear of the property along the waterfront away from adjacent properties. This location will minimize noise impacts to adjacent properties. ~`~ ~~ ~~ ,~.... ~~...W ~ i ATTACHMENT C RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and development standards. The applicant is requesting an increase in height from 30'-0" to 6S' feet. The setback reduction requests are limited to a decrease in the front pavement setback to the required dumpster staging area, a minor setback reduction to a side sidewalk, and a rear setback reduction to the proposed wooden pool deck. The use of the site is limited to residential condominiums which is within code. The intensity of the project is 12 condominium units which is well under the allowable 1 S.6 units allowed by code. The proposed impervious area is at a 0.69 ISR which is well below the allowable 0.95 ISR. The remainder of the open space is heavily landscaped to provide foundation plantings, intermediate focus trees, and buffer hedges. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting properties. 3. 4. Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will be enhanced by the development of this project. The adjacent properties are older apartments and multi-family structures. The construction of a new condominium building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting properties, as well as increase the fair market value. The anticipated sale costs of each unit are well in excess of $500,000, which will increase the property values of the neighborhood. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The proposed request for condominiums is consistent with both the existing zoning and future land use of the subject property and adjoining parcels. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment ~ project are compatible with adjacent land uses. _, .a~. The proposed use of the property is consistent with adjacent land uses asmulti- --~ family. The recently approved developments near this project along with the existing uses of the surrounding land uses are generally multi-family. The use is .` consistent with the City tourist zoning designati and County Future Land Use designation ... 5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The applicants of this project have lived on this property for some time and are the owners of the property. They are committed to develop their property to its best and highest use that is compatible with recently approved developments in the area. This development is possible since the property is currently owned by the developer and land costs due to other approved projects make the development impractical in other areas. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infili redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity consists of older multi-family structures, several of which will be torn down to construct recently approved projects. The development of this project will upgrade the surrounding building appearances by using Mediterranean themed architecture, as well as a fully landscaped property with palm trees and shrubs. The project also eliminates perpendicular parking from the public road, which is still currently in use on the immediately adjacent properties. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed investment made in the property by removal of older buildings and replacing with new construction will benefit the immediate area aesthetically, increase the property values of adjacent property, stimulate the redevelopment of adjacent property, and provide a viable to increase the tax base of the City. The aesthetic character of the community will also be enhanced by the architecture of the building with fully Landscaped grounds. The landscaping includes a combination of palms, trees and shrubs, which fully encompass the property. The rear of the property will include a modest pool surrounded by architectural pavers. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Flexibility in regard to required rear setback and height increase are requested for this project. The property has been owned for a long duration of time by the applicant and is working with their existing property constraints to create a project ~`~ s~ 4-~ r that fits the property and is consistent with other recently approved projects within the area. The existing immediate vicinity currently utilizes backout parking within the right of way, which severely limits the capacity of the existing roadway. The proposed project proposes to take the parking and move it all into a fully enclosed parking garage under the living units. This will enhance the capacity of the existing roadway and eliminate the visual degradation of the area by exterior parking. The requested setback flexibility is offset by the landscape package. The landscaping in the existing vicinity is very limited and is severely stressed in many cases. This property has proposed landscaping in all open space areas except for the required sodded stormwater treatment ponds. The landscaping includes taller palm trees, intermediate shrubs and lower groundcover that surrounds the building and mitigates for the setback flexibility. The building height is offset by the stepped facade of the building along with the enhanced Mediterranean theme. The current architecture of the vicinity is dated without the City preferred Mediterranean theme. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required parking per standard code would be provided on-site. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable) The "Old Florida" district is an area of transition between resorts and low intensity. The mix of uses favor residential rather than retail. Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing buildings and should be low to mid-rise. Lack of parking hinders revitalization of existing improvements particularly on Bay Esplanade. The proposed building consists of aloes-density four unit multi-family project and does not include any retail uses. The density of the project is less than required by the Tourist district and with only 12 units is below several of the existing apartment developments in the surrounding area. The building being 68-` 11" ° ~ °°~ above FEMA to midroof would generally be considered as a mid-rise building --- -~ consistent with other recently approved projects which have set a standard of ~~~' development. The project includes all required parking on-site and within the building to revitalize the integrity and capacity of Bay Esplanade. . K n i The azchitecture of the building is generally Mediterranean in nature, which is consistent with the remainder of the tourist district with significant undulating azchitectural features. The architecture is enhanced by the proposed palm trees, which soften the corners of the building and provide a vegetative scale to the structure. The colors of the building are consistent with the recently approved projects along the beach and do not include any wild or obtrusive colors. ~ d ... _ _. ORIGINAL ~ ~~ 1 ~ ,~ r~ ~.. _ ~ _ 5' PUBLIC SIDEWALK 1 ( (iYP.) 4' CONC. SIDEWALK (iYP.) '^ 10'x10' DUMPSTER & RECYC ING a' CONC. SIDEWALK (TYP.) INDEX INN 9 ER CITY GRAPHIC SCALE 2 L STAGING AREA w ~j WHEEL STOP PER CITY jr" (IJ RI-1 STOP SIGN (I) 24" STOP BAR ! w _ avl~ INDE% K11] P _ V S 54 1 +E 1 13.95 (M) I ~e ~ o I n O m ~_ _ ~ _ .. _ _ _ _ .m _ _ ~ .. _~ _ = _ _ . .,_ . w _ _ CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE 6" 9HICK, 3000 P91 FlBERMESH CONCRETE 10 10 WE LED WR M H 6" " Q' - n N ~ ~ LEGEN() •> x6 x W/ / L E cS (2) HC. RAMPS N/ TRUNCATED DOMES F>ER EDOT INDEX k30d Q' a Q~ R ' ' / -- zJ 55) n ___ __-_ _ - ___ ~ ~ f .-_ ___--III ,d A I • (rW) ~••~••~• - YPICAL PRaECr BauNO.ARr (2) 2G'x20' SIGHT N5181LITV TRIANGLES (NOTE: OBJECT WITHIN GG A J 0 2p3 ~ N 9' I EXISTING 1 22.5' SEAWALL SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIAN~ ES MUST NOT E%CEED 30" IN HEIGHT) , 5' 12 (TYP.) I ~ Ex15nnG mEE TO BE REMOVED - y p ~ ~ 6 N ~~ I 2p REOUIREC ~ ; ', '•: PROPOSLT CONCRETE PARxwG REAR SETBACK ~ p ~ ~ Q~ ~ (, /'1 OVERHANG TYPICAL ' ~ N I =E( LF<AL r(JTL ~ N ry ~ 1 \/ \ ~ (2) "00 NOi ENTER" 19'(T~) I A 1 'L J SIGNS ~ I I. ENGINEEA/LANDSCAPE ARCHI1ECi: A ~ ` O - _ m zC `~ Z 1 \ , GALE m 1 ]OI ENiERPR SE OAD EA35 SU TE <Oa SAFETY HARBOR R 3a595 p ~ ~ ~ p + 4" WHITE TRAFFlC ~~- Z TWICAL COLUMN '1 I~ . >2] >93 9888 BPUe ~] ; 2] J93 9855 x zd Ze O __ \ \ / PAINT (iYP.) 6~ STRAIGHT LOCATON 1 1 1 Z. SI1F ADOgE55 /1: 66] BAY ESPLANADE ...1 ~ ..] a ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ Z1' ~ /, \ / CURB PER 4 ,_ I II I PARCEL 10: GIFARWAIER R OS/29/IS/StJ56/0>J/0070 ~ ~ ~ ~ Iy ~•' ~ ~ Oi INDEX 'I ~%\ ~iO u IT A R / \ N I l ~1 V S E DD ESS (2: CIEARWAIER~FL ADE m ~ m ~ ~~ fe.,xF~ ~ '/ SIGN LOCATQN _ II PARCEL D OS/29/15/St]56/0]>/0060 ' 1 ~ R ZON NG ~ ~ I 1 1 • \\ / II ~ I . PRESENT USE ! i IS MULTFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNITS ~ 6 ~ d I ' \/ lll~~~ I . ~ j U U 22.119 ~. - - - ~ /\ 4 I D ' I / t DEVELOPED USE 12 MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNIL$ 1 I ~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ 2CM BARABE % \ % J ~ I 5. TOTAL SITE AREA 22,895.86 SF (0.52 ACJ I + ~'- \~~ ~ - ) zo ye. z I .7- I 1~ - ~ ~ i > \ ~ I TI IAB11fLOOM i. ~ PDOE ) I \~~ Eauw ~ 6. A)BAIXS: REWIRED PROPOSED IO-15' FROni 23.4fi NIN. (NORTHWEST i0 BlOG.J ! d Q i,, ' I \ ~ O ~ -+--. l ..ii ~ O.aG (a ou9PSrtq srADxc PAIEMw 0 ~ H I ~ ~ / / ~ 1 CM o-lo' smE 9.1 TH ra soEwALK) O I 1 t I 1B' 12 DARAOE ~f."i~ 62 ( GRTI TO BLDG.) 16.55 NIN_ (WEST TO BLDG 7 LZ ~ 1 ~ ~ I :P( / ~A 1 ' ~ iN. (NEST TO SDEWALK) fi.96 ' ~ ~ G. c ~ I 9 rp ~ I /ay I 10-20 REAR 2 . N. (SOU ]HEAST TO BIDO.) W W 1 I ~ 1 ~ J / l ~j/N / 0.00 MIN. (SOUTHEAST i0 WOOD DECK) C+ WW F-' Es] 10 REQUIRED 1 I ~ / ~ ~ \ \ ~ / I/ ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT > PROPOSED Bl-G HEIGHT '_ Q 65-0" FRp1 FEMA LINE TO TOP OF ROOF AAB 2 > F- ~ V) SIDE SETBACK ~ N 1CM OA•RA~E \% n /// II I1 . 8. 50.10 WASTE DUMPSTER WLL BE LOCATED IN BUILDING Q ' ,~ ] \\ . I BT 2LAR DARMsE ~ I ( 16 55' I I N 1 °' ~ 1 II • - --- - >< (2) 20'x20' WATERFRONT N481L1 TY ( ~ TRIANGLES (NOTE: OBJECT WTHIN ) ¢(a WATERFRONT NSIBILITY TRIANGLES-~:~ MUST NOT EXCEED 30" IN HEIGHT) 'i G • _.y _N 89"09.00'•' W 48.46'(M) ~vAVEMENT CURVE TABLE 11• LOMPaCTEO SUBGRAOE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS BEARING CHORD TO 98f Max. OENSiY 8013 8" CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL Nre ~ ~ U 9. U(91nNG lwiHlN PROJECT BOUNDARIES N1LL BF ATTACHED TO 3 ~ BUILDING AND WLL BE $UBMIT9ED AS PART W FINAL BUILDING PLANS. GOMMMiTY POOL 4-4 ROOAI 10. E%ISTNC BUILDING Fpp1PRINT AREAS - >,0]I.)] SF + 0.16 AC. p ff Gry S TI. Au olsngeeo CRASS 1NTHIN RIGHT-of-wnr sHAU eE sooocD. A F 12. ALL uNU5E0 O11VEwAtS MUST BE REMOVED Arv0 REPLACED WTH CURB WOOD DECK W/ POOL SIDEWALK, ANO LANDSCAPING TO MATCH ExISTING CONDInONs \\ / $ SPA PACKAGE ~. IJ. FTM000 ZONE. IS PROPERTY LIES 'MTIIN FLODO ZONE "AE' AS pEPIC1E0 POOL DECK ON FEMA FL000 INSURMICE RATE MAP NO. 12509fi0102G (ELEV II) 8 DAZED: SEPIENBER J, 200J Q ~ w .m ~•+ .,w. 14. TIE PROJECT SIGNAGE HILL MEET ME CITY OF CLEARWATERS CODE. 1 . C Y>/~ -~~ ~.. 13. THERE ARE NO ViLTY EASEMENtS DENTFlED BY THE SURVEY ON _ ~ / ~~ ` ~ ~ VW// .y THS PROPERTY. Y~~~ tW o-.. Ifi. THERE ARf NO ENNROMENTALLY UN OVE AREAS ON SITE. ~6 /~ + I]. A 5200 RECREATION FAGLITY IMPACT FEE 15 DUE FOR EACH NEW UNIT PRIOR i0 g ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERNITS OR FINAL PLAL (IF APPUCABLEJ WNICN EVER OCCURS FIRST CONTACT ART NAOER Ai ]2].582.4824. - IB. DUMP5IER SERNLE SHALL BE ARRANGED WM SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO TIF N ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL LICENA IXE CERTFICAIE OF OCCUPANCY. _ r"-7 __ PLEASE coNTACr TON cLtNN AT >z>.sfiz.a9JO ~~ "~ 19. STF DATA tABIE E I~yy_ ~pgg, gEa nED. ~+ A NTAI 4)E AREA: 21,895.86 SF (051 AC) 21,895.66 sF (0.51 AC) 0,000.00 g g6 O B. TOTAL WEN SPALE: J ]]136 g (006 AC) 6.899.15 SF (015 AC) i IH.>9 Sf (0.01 AC MIN.) F~p +~ a C. 6ULL0 NG FOOTPgINi: ]0]I ]] 4 (0.]01511) II,Z568] g (0.19158) e3 l~L ^~~w E. AOEW.W(/DEG(/1'AKO AREA: 11091,]1 4 ,]50.84 $F TOTAL 4PERNWS AREA. 912150 S (QB] ISR) g (0.69 ISR) 11,)51.06 g (0.9519V 4Ax.) w.rl Nr: '^'^"~~ C PAR(MG 59AQ$: I] SPACES Q ?2 SPACES 18 (1.5 gALESAMi) ~~SS l£HIp1LAR AREA: N/A 1 N/A _ HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL -=.• A~ L INTEwOq IAxOSCAPE ANEA-. rv/A N/A N/A EETw m.l (+~ iJ J. MULfI FAMILY UMiS: B UN115 12 UN11S 15.8 UNITS (]0 UNUS/ACRE W HANOICAPPEO SIGN OEialL - - ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY `~ OF G ISSUE DATE. 09.08.05 ~~0 •: ..r.~ C~ f GENERAI LAND5CaPE NOTES' ~. wa•L a e ~~. ~<,«m. eno a ee. ae~eeR a .. e..m~„«. Le P~P.a nm ~.,. a.a =o. a.a n.P..oc. oPUm„m ~~ Opanm of eylc~ iwon of Rant ineuatry Guam and 5lanaaNe ro~NU~~M ante . •. uio.a~tme~• n a rannrsee ..<n Ap~~~orm za-~o-s iadxe oe cep one monuf«au.an meu~coew~a ~~ w ~ an ..m `me~ a nla Caen t w ow9w rr~ia ai a en.amue~ra a a gm~egm o'~w. .ne ~«ew e o o n. mr en, .nKn s ro ea .ot..ee . oar ena aum ]. a qom ma ~ Ms La.exape Co.bo~tw. ie tlw e.Mt a~ 0 d'euma q 10. vucn condLOn, ar a anon a Ina oa oce i nmeemry apgam4 wnnN me 4cmma La pe mn ~I. ~b mL~W q ~e n ~n iaeee ewxoGb. of encn trrx lM Wnacom MN~41 ~1. Mn~MnTee m Ilioee. ~ ~ pconw~~Q a mx~noalanem Ne m a~nnaa ae Me~anaxaw McmlM ~~. aammM: h~ _.~,® R"° `m' " • ~^9. co" w~.,me r = m~~ a ~.ww Iizl n~u. ~.om r~.m .s ^Po~^ ,mm a e..... _w ".awl .. U., ,>. M m,~e«. w„ a ~e a Pmnwe ens . m.p a~~>•~ .m an.,.,m em~mw~,Mam ~ou..o~,A~.. ~9. E.. tlnq eoe Mail Y .mwraa w vacsemry ro mcanoeab .a pwotirp+. 10. ee:elieq acme tool an mewrem a q a bNeevoe ~nnonalwn Man a reeo0aetl r~M 51. Auqunm TI. neponeiuie to a mMC1wn, ~emaml. an0 prroe ae~w~ al a Y di MWa IRRIGATION NoTEs a. w ~,°m`~i: ~~mri ~o. R"..a.eon.'ArzomMO Ra ~ e~naiorc omu.~..) `.name.. iaox ~ „a ~vu~m a .am m.m,~a;an,.,. 6/a wmut.uone, nwet ee euumntee pow w wei ~.spcem one o«.go.«e• s m a~a w.e...roro rs v,. rKOU~.. e-comam.m„y E n~.. um Imtec ~0 Rw~E vale Bm,van TREE REMOVAL 1RfE 1 9tE W/DE 13' PAUI 13' PALM LLL 3 TOTAL PALM TREES REMOVED RLANT L _T Q 5 ttycMe eE4jem.u im. fie'-ta'cTrv.~ Im. (1a'-1a Gr. XT )SiAGGEnEo o epu ime aeimmm nPiwmom ~ ceL.. 3 XT) W~ n~*ti~~so.c "`'sw;~rt'3~;,~n o~m ~: ,z 7 `' I r 1 C ±~ 5 J~S 2 r ~ ~ G] ~ ~ a ~ o a o ~4. asw~ ra ro: m a m a a z a ~ ~ a a y F U 6 U7 z a a J ~ 6 U 6 of 6 ISSUE DATE'. 09.08.05 CURVE TABLE GRAPHIC SCALE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS BEARING CHORD M1.35 xAT i wee ~ o'it FLD2005-07078 665 BAY ESPLANADE Date Received: 07/29/2005 NEPENTHE __D ~~~ ~~ ~~~ _.~. ...~~ .. ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: ~~FI~ ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTEF~ED .~,~r. .~ ._ CLWCoverSheet 5' PUBLIC SIDEWALK (TYP.) ]' CONC. SIDEWALK (TVP.) 4' CONC. SIDEWA (TYP H.C. SIGN PER CITY 5'x6' DUMPSTER ') NOE% 0119 GRAPHIC SCALE STAGING AREA WHEEL STOP PER CITY Q _ INDE% pit] _ Off' S8 '54_1 "E _ ° z 113.95'(M) _ _ I ~e ''°''` CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE P °~- ' "'~` ~ "-"`~" ' 6' THICK, 3000 P51 FIBERMESH CONCRETE `i W/ 6"x6"/10x10 WELDED WRE METH ~ ~/ ~ ~ • LEGEND P e n e ____ (2) H.C. RAMPS N/ ~ z ]_ __~ _ __-____ TRUNCATED DOMES PER Q S55] ----------- -----'I Y (Tw.) TroICAL EDOT INDEX 030 ~ ~ 1 -~~ ~._..> PROJECT BOUNDARY (2) 20'x2D SIGHT VISIBILITY ?pJ ] I EXISTING TRIANGLES (NOTE. OBJECT WITHIN ~ ~ t. _ 6 g' II 22.5' //////SEAWALL SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIAN~LLES P d' (TYP.) / ~ E%6TNG TREE TD Bf REMOVEp MUST NOT EXCEED 30" IN HEIGHT) I ~~ 5' 12' I / ' ~ p 0 J r tl II 11 O f N~ ~~ O 1~ REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK ] 'T ' y. 6 - 4 - LL R~ ~ 6 I /1 20' REQUIRED EAR SETBACK PRaPOUD cONLRETE PARK uc h 1~/ ~~ 4 -. ti - ~~ OVERHANG TYPICAL 19'(TYP.) ~ R U N J M' N I IHEPA; I t0 / N q2 4" WHITE TRAFFIC PAINT (TYP.) o ~ q' g fi' STRAIGHT CURB PER ~ R1 ~ ~~ °~.- CITY INDE% 0101 YPICAL COLUMN ~ LOCATION ~ ~ ~ 2 II ; I I 1 iI m I 1 7 I I 11 I 1 III 1 ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH 2AYAC W ASSOCIATES. INC. ]01 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404 SAFETY HARBOR. L 34fi95 ()2)) )93-9888 Bus ()2]) ]93 9655 Fvx 2. SITE ADDRESS pl: 68] Bav ESPLANADE CLEARwgiER, fL PARCEL ID: OS/29/15/54]56/0]]/pp]0 SHE ADDRESS dZ. fifi5 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER. R m m W L7 ~ CJ Q Z~ a 6 Q G ~ ~ Q 6. O d O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2" ~ >" C G W ¢ !il E I SIGN LOCATION (PART OF A SEPARATE CDMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACKAGE) I 1 I PARCEL Ip, OS/29/15/54]56/OJ)/0060 ZONING: i' N ~ ~ 3 ~ 6 0 6 14.65' ( 1 )! 3. PRESENT USE 1} MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNHS f~s ~ ~1 4. DEVELOPED USE 12 MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNITS U U _ I ' i 2 S. TOTAL SITE AREA 22,895.86 SF (0.52 AC) 0AQ1 \ L I' I 9 I~ I (TYP.) I I I ~- I 16 56 1 1 P N I o 0 ~ I I -' __ __ (2) 20'.20' WATERFRONT VISIBILITY A TRIANGLES (NOTE: OBJECT WITHIN m WATERFRONT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES-,~ o~ MUST NOT EXCEED 30" IN HEIGHT) ~ 3 6 -- o< N~ 4.5 y ~ 49 ~z N 69'09'00"~ _ 48.46'(M) z J' uN [ONCRE JE CURVE TABLE t2T COMPACTED 6UBGRADE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS BEARING CHORD 0 90R MA%. DENSITY CI 8" CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL ~ f O9q. fi. SETBACKS: BE9Sl1HED pgOp(~j ~ 10-15' FRgVT 23.46' MIN. (NORTHWEST i0 BLDG) Q / 20.29' MIN. (WEST i0 OVERHANG) Q 0-10' SIDE 9.31' MIN. (NORTH TO 90EWALK) ~ ~ / 11.62' MIN. (NORTH TO BLpG.) _ ~ lass' MN. (wESi TD eLDC.) ~' Ga. z ~ ~ 1fi 98 MN (WEST TO SOEWALN) ,.Z d BPA ~ 10-ZO' REAR 30.1]' M N (SOUTHEAST TO BLDG.) ~ Q. ~~ /' ] ~ ] /. 0.00 Mx. (SOUTHEAST TO WOOD DECK) 1 F W Q F ' ]. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 35'-100' Fi Z ~ N Ir PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT BB'-11" FROM FEMA LINE i0 TOP OF ROOF SLAB Q' I\I\\ B. SOLID WASTE WMPSTER WILL BE LOCATED IN BUILDING 9. LIGHTING WITHIN PROJECT BWNOARIES WILL BE PITACHED i0 f.J BUILDING AND HILL RE SUBMITTED AS PART OF FINAL BUILDING PLANS. ~ ~ POOL / a - `~ 10 E%STNG BU LO NG FOOTPR Ni AREAS = ),OJ1 ]] SF = 016 AC 11. ALL DISTURBED GRASS WIINN RGHT OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDEp. WOOD DECK W POOL 12. ALL UNUSED DR VEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WM CURB y y ~~ / S DEWALN. AND LANDSCAP NG i0 MATCH E% STING CBNDITIONS r & SPA PACKAGE I3. GLOOD ZONE: 9 IRIS PRDPERTY LIES WITHIN 8000 ZONE 'AE" AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOCS INSURANCE RATE MAP N0. 1250960102G (ELfV ti) ti"_ OATEp: SEPTEMBER J, 2003 '6 b ~ f 10-1 '~~ w 14. A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACKAGE WILL BE SUBMITTED ~ 0 ~j _ UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPL CATION. ~ ' ~ v 15. TNERf ARE ND UTILItt EASEMENTS IGENTIFIEO BY THE SURVEY W 5 THIS PROPERTY. - tfi. THERE ARE ND ENVIROMENTALLV UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE H I]. A 1200 RECREATION FACILITY IMPACT FEE IS pUE FOR EACH NEW UNIT PRIOR TD ISSUANCE Of BUILDING PERMITS OR FINAL PLAT (IF APPOCABIE) WHICH EVER OCCURS FIRST. CONTACT ARi KApER AT )2].562.4824. -- -- - _ IB. pUMPSTFR SERVICE SHALL BE ARRANGED KITH SOLID WASTE pEPARTMENT PRIOR i0 THE w P3 T~7 ISSIANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCDPANCY. imW _- 7 _- _-_ _ _ PLEASE CONTACT TOM GLENN AT ]2].562.49}p ~~ u~ 9. 6TF T IABF E%ISTNG. pl7'~p~f g(~W(~ '~ ~_ ~" TO STE PEA'. 32095.06 SF (0.52 [) 226 5.86 SF (052 AC) WO.W SF ~~ O V ~ r~ B. i0i IMEN SP CE 3]]2.38 SF (0.09 CJ 6009. 5 SF (0. 5 C) 1.149.]9 BF (0.02 AC MIN.) ~~ Y~ __- C. B Lp NG FDOTPR NT. ]031.77 SF (.RI ERJ 11,255.8] SF (0. 9 W) kH E. SpE /OFL /P KO AREA. 209.)] 5 ]50.04 SF 6~ F. TOTAL IMPERMWS AREA: 19,12350 EF (0.83 TER) t6,006.)I SF (0.69 154) 11,)51.06 y (0.95 1St MAX.) w "~~"" ~~ G. PARKING SPACES. 11 SPACES 24 SPACES IB (1.5 ~ACEfi/UNI1) ~~ ~~~~ VEHICULAR AREA: H/q N/q _ HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL I' ~ f I iERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA. N/A N/A N/A ~ ~y Ar J. MULTI FAMILY UNHS: B UNITS 12 UNITS 156 UNITS (30 UNHS/ACRE ~E M 01t _ HaNDILAPPED SIGrv DETAIL - - - ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY 4 OF 7 ISSUE DATE: 06.09.05 t~ErvERAL ~aNOSC a~~ NuT~~ ,. ;~nrq ort~ ,ntr~te, .~ap ,rea P~P q e.,.. r .~ .,..P p,~,,. pr„.. p,P ~w. e P m~. ePr~em ]. env tr ~tnwEa t~one^ 9 Bee r«ueo Imm time to t~ma. ""uen of Piont Ina ry 4roaee one stencnNC for N ry Dote J. pq q an Do none n oeeo.eoMe won tiw EmriEO u.rr~ymen a o.E Gro.ai s woe~atmns apprwee proct~cae. A ne .lo~ a ii ee leriiiaaa eau sgrilorm fo-10-5 toeie~e pe the manNOCWrtra epecnKm~ene ~n ~ 1.on rnn 9 Eeotw.vevbcr pot^tne a omrab^pe ~pMnepe e~fieaMene. trry^e ur of not Contr ataeeellenuone axone ee emovm v s, I~iH m emenu on a cne u. •~ ~ ~,e een.e es me p=n .et Hale, wec A=ago.. .nei~ e. arrt.e m m. wwe r A nr t ,.. o<erten<~ePp~ e~er~t~,.. c e~en,r.e^etwt ~R• w= ~e rr~.Pp A,em. a rnPO e..Oe. e~,a mPntr r,o,n une~ ts. ~mm~ar:ryao e b ~ ~~. wnerepe een,re<t>~ p br to ~enorPr ~t.ne~ ,n.rpepee. wkr.ooM». ts. r e~rt ov me oC'~IV eP opct u ap rrt proper ~nelailolce cornea oul ery ~oneecor Cum.x~orpat w ma~LOnai ca REIGA--r h~ y;.TE ;eam'e":.'n=°°'~e~ ~a. Pr...nt,~,.YAaPmM,~ Re~°~°,'~en a.,e..t ~..t A e a~.u <e toaz ea . om ~n<ier a rmn roe, ene r~r :i rt,t~pen.. me.. ne .~emn p w e,„~ mpKUen P~ «cePteeee. u~' Z n F u Q t+ f ~ f ~, G L -~~ J Q ~ 4; r- n ~ r c~ r~ °a a °a a z ^ z c a o w~. ea~c.. r ~ N z ~ F m F t~0 ~ [~O Q ~ z o ~ a a ~. cx aw. 3: w ¢ C F U 3 0 Z z z w ~ ~ U TREE RE~A~J'vA~~_ rat ~ va uAOE 13' PALM 13' PALM 12_ESLM 3 iOiAl PALM TREES RENDVFO PLFiN~ ~~T prycnaaRnne EieOane. AbxeMer Peim, tB'-tVCTMt wit nm(Pe' ~Z c rGwi.19TAGGEREo GAt~I.`nT.l~x S'OC. ue rsry *un.> GAan o ISSUED FOR 7 of 7 GRAPHfC SCALE CURVE TABLE CURVE ~ENGTN RADIUS BEARING CMGRp B0.}5 C~ 1 a rsn ) k CONCRETE DRIVCWAY SHl 6" THICK, 3000 PSI FIBERMESH COn W/ 6"x6'/IOnO WELDED WIRE (2) H.C. RAMPS W/ TRUNCATEp DOMES PER- FDOT INOE.K N304 (2) 20'x20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES (NOTE: OBJECT WITHIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES MUST NOT EXCEED JO" IN HEIGHT) ~ ~ ^ ^ _ ^ O I N O f r..9 ^.~ ~, ~~ ~ . 4 t~ ~ ^ .' A ~ ^ ~J I } ~.W WoP e ~ „ '1 ~w~ . { N ~ ~__~- (2) 20'x20' WATERFRONT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES (NOTE: OBJECT WITHIN WATERFRONT NBIBILITY TRIANGLEB~ MUST NDT E%CEED 30" IN HEIGHT) SOW PSI 3' NIU CONCRETE PAVEMENT 12' coMPACTEO su8paaoE i0 9BA MAK DENSITY 8" CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL 5' PUBLIC SIDEWALK (TYP.) 5'x6' DUMPSTER 7' CONC. SIDEWALK TYP.) STAGING AREA ( r4' CONC. SIDEWALK (TYP,) 589 54:+5"E . ~ _.• •_.. 10~ p~~+ +~ ~ E ,., '~~a- ro ~~ `~ .1~ ti. ~'~ q7~ t. ~-- 14.65' rI I 9' (TYP.) BIONAOL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • N 89'09'00° W 48.46~(M) CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RApIUS BEARING CHORD CI W.25 ~ ' C3 181]0 03' M 56]'%'2]'W ~13' w H.C. SIGN PER CITY WOEX /119 WHEEL STOP PER CITY INDE% /117 _ I 1 9' - 22.5' (TYP.) 1.J I_ I 11 ~__..._ ~OVERMANC TYPICAL r---19-(TY-P.) TYPICAL L LOLUA ~~~ rLOCATION WHITE TRAFFIC PAINT (TYP.) STRAIGHT CURB PER Y INDE% X101 ~ ~? r ,'; 'P~l~ / BPA 9Rl `1 ,, 1~1 ~~ - ~- - ;'f~ Ati. F94 E.ililC HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL :-.:1 ~J4'-i EXISTING SEAWALL Y ul ~O A N U ^ A y m ^ ^ 1 ^ • GRAPHIC SCALE a ~L m tt l e LEGEND /`_""'•~ . r.... •.. PROJECT BWNOAPY ExISTING ntE[ i0 BE RCMOKD ~ PRDPOS6o cavcREiE PARxwc c I ~ENEPAL NOTES: ~' E- 2- I. ENpNEER/LANDSCAPE AR CHITECT: KEITH ZATAC t ASSOC AYES, INC. ~ ~ ]Ot ENTERPRISE ROAD EASL, SUITE 101 W C> e] SAFETY HARBOR FL Ja895 (>2Z) 79] 9866 Buc a ]1] 79] 9855 Fox 2. SITE ADDRESS /1: 86] BAT ESPLANADE 4 ~ O PARCEL D~ Lt£ARWAIER, FL OS/2B/IS/51]56/O]]/DO]0 ~ ~ ~ ~ SITE ADDRESS /2: 665 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL ~ ~ Ci a ~ m PARCEL ID, , OS/29/t5/51758/0]]/0060 F ~ F 6 ~ ZONUlC: 'T" m C ~ } PRESENT USE 13 MULTIfAMILT CONDOMINIUM UNITS ~ E~i 4 DEVELOPED USE 12 MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNITS U U . 5. TOTAL SITE AREA 22.895.86 SF (0.52 AC) B. SETBACKS: gEDfBBED 10-15' FROUt 2).16' MIN. (NORTHWEST i0 BLDG.) d 20.29' MW. (WEST TO DKRNANG) G7 0-)0' SIDE 9.21' MIN. (NpiTH i0 SIDEWALK) a t1.62' MIN. (NORTH TO BLDG.) 18 55' MIN (WEST TO BLDG) O z . . 18.98' MIN. (WEST TO SIDEWALK) ~ ~ 10-3p' REAR 20.1)' MN9. (SOUTHEAST TO BLDG.) a d 0.00' MIN. (SOUTHEAST i0 w000 DECK) . ^~ F W :i d F ]. ALLOWABLE MAx HEIGHT ]5'-100' fT z a ~ PROPOSEp BLDG. HEMAVT 68'-]t" FROM fEMA UNE TO TOP of RODE' BLAB d 8 SOLID WASTE WMPSTER 'MLL BE LOCATED IN BUILDING [ j .] 9. LIGHtING WITHIN PROJECT BOUNDARIES {MLL BE ATTACHED 10 BUILDING AND WLL BE SUBMITTED AS PART a FINAL BUILDING PLANS. 10. E%ISTING BUILDING [OOTPRINT AgEA6 ~ ].031.]] SF - 0.16 AC. tt. ALL DISTURBED CRASB vATHM RIGHT-DF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED. 12. All UNUSED DMVEwAY6 MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB SIDEWALK. AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS 13. FLOOD ZONE: THIB PROPERTY LIES WTHIN ROOD ZONE 'AE" AS DEPICTED ON FENA FL000 INSURANCE RATE MAP NO 1250960102E (ELEV 11) DATED: SEPTEMBER }, 2p03 11. A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACKAGE WILL BE SUBIWi1ED UNDEP A SEPARATE PERMIT APPUCAnON. 1S. THERE PRE NO UnLITY EASEMENLS IDENTIFIED BY THE BURVET ON MIS PROPERTY. i6. THERE ARE NO ENMRONENtALLT UNIWE AREAS ON BILE. 1]. A BZOO RECREATION FACILITY IMPACT FEE IS DUE FOR EACH NEW UNIT PRIOP TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITB OR FINAL PLAT (IF APPLICABLE) YmICN EVER OCCURB FIRST. ca+1ACT ARr KADER Ar n] 5621821. 16. DUMPSTER $ERMCE SHALL BE ARRANGED WITH SOLID WASTE DEPARMENi PRIOR i0 THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPgnONAI LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. PLEASE CONTACT TOM GLENN qT 72].562.19]0 19. SiF DATA iA&E f8D-ttli pq~Dgp: ~~(~ A. iDTM SIZE AREA: 22,89586 N (651 AC) 22,895.88 Sf (0.52 AC) t0,W0.00 Sf B. T01AL OPEN SPACE ],T2J8 4 X0.08 AC) 6,889.15 Sf (015 AC) 1,111.]9 Ef (ODI AC MW.) C. BMLDIN4 FOOTPRWT: ],OJT.]] Y (OJO 5R) 11.2558) Sf (019 TSB) - E. SIDCWALK/OECK/PAKO AREA: 12,091.]l Sf 1]SO.N Sf - f. i01M NMERVp15 AREA: 19,12}Sp 5f (0.8) 168) 16.006.]1 Sf (0.69 ISR) 21,)51.08 S (695188 YAM.) G. PARKING SPACES'. IJ SPACES 21 SPACES )6(15 BPACESAMI) H. KMGRAP ARCH: X/A q/A - I. WIERIOR UNDSCAPF AgEA: N/A N/A N/A J. YULn fAMIT UMtt: a UWtt 12 UMTS 1}6 UM15 (b we1S/ACRE ~er O ~ 7~ CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTI RADIUS BEARING CHORD C1 B0.A5 'v)6e O'IM1 E GRAPHIC SCALE 1 mee .~lo In {{e~~~ '_M'T'.J 1 1.TI S i _•~ GENERAL LANDSCAPE NO-~ ~. ~ a:~:1n°°' mreclp Ma. nee. mere e.. e..qu ne. a Rnra. Pe.eM a„aqe eb mamwr. egr~mw., :. ~°°~a ~•~qq"'e"""'" ~om°M"ee:o0lem.""s.~r.~~ 8w;~o., of v" M'7rwio'c;oe.."a~ sere r°a"."ia°R"»r". M.. 3. w menure eu a eon. ,~ o<pmne..M m. nereo Nw . ene qre..:. A~a1 ororw..a o «fe... obi 5M i tw lanwzea wrn yrilerm ]0-10-! re4W oe wr vw menulaWn pe kolas ~n ~u tan won 5. m; coal pm~ofa ~ a. 1u •: 501{ cone pM 50. onwu wm w ~eet.~ p~wioie~a~rolwan~ a .otn-nu~sn9 ~vab. un rnnu Weo~a rrm•.~ade ova ~^uWNSo-~.. p_ bnt'nq a sos coon rsoprs o 3' Myer o mu n, wucn a to weuna-M onw ~ntaroran. ~ eMwpn rn~ men sent 1 enw wsnu. sM ~o M Cmtieeror. fe nu pent of o enereponcy 6 oM 0sxse o1 1M oennMer• pwr. spscitammn. Ary r"°ur'a net meeNq spsoemtam onus M romwes ~ Iuey eet en tM de umxxs. 0acn ein :Me~eo~ nee t~ln~ aeepeeNeMlsot rix Iw foxun m open auto fan, w ler wren en IM pen of Va LoiM Ms Cen4x10r oletne nms u nAe q. f0. snen wcunre ex nscsswn oo v ns ew ;genes re perlerm wore M qnn .n tnu µm sm an uv . ~ncm tt. • n~we q'.nn. eneJe~rneigeus. ~ s. al woos lvns uw Lore n cM1em tt. Ary un 0 n omrnng p set ew/er epe. coven enW m CneeW re IM Lonmmpe McMIM (ri~)Mieiaeoe f3. n soon a no oeapbru, nnewM u Must tubs snmoin rn.. per a fns o.nr. 1•. x Ma~cseN ~^• eKKinsr. qumemn, .n aq. vkal eunneq Mn Wr s pnae d rwsM (1A) men0v fnm unW 15. - epnsrq 1M Lmawn CoMrxror nrier ro bimecops mmerp mMepman 0.s<npare;n w ~sy foc0~us fe. es b q M Cary svro~w+ wraq. .cn pew n, naivuon carne p1 q bMecepss [ont.xmr u n eca.lwen7oul. 1T. M q•rmus n.coeey ers fe a woewe q 1M ;mleMnq eonrixlor unass unsnw svpmcofy ewsse 'M 1M spo;0colMn fe. w oonl~mr a.mnaman .q . eun a o.rpnee on :n, woaet...o.A1 1m 1q wo1«1 ,memao.n ewn +q. un.q we .me d ,.ne..e m nce..pr u oeoemoew. ,M. oamaq.. AD, ~.~,re o~.oe rnm en mawre.e . re MnaKOO. aelmman .non a re.eee.e .nn s1..N,gww 3f. o.n~.oa i.'aq Zia oalorown a . w1 `erorae, nmpx on woos eaoewi e1 eq mm m. ewn. xx. ep orw. a~n~nee wmm~ ro m q Ma.. ee .eea.e. IRRIGA~I Ofd NOTES i an .rM.m, na1 . 1mx <p..oq. m w o ww mo~nq•.e +i n. we5^ee we iMmW q vre Gnwctor. ]. Mq~roepao.e r, olbn S..M 1 .. (;.. wee Pa: vn..nr ten, Anpnue Re °{n°e"o°n DnM<,c~...) 3 e,eoree „ 1b on w q Lo e s';":~MR~an mum n. peme~.e q:dr"foWme"""qe~n eee ~..>r,n... ti poe.m.m era w.p Mamr for 1n. .°;oaM'a"nn,m rM,.r .,~n me o<npe~ enR~rer. e e.~q .. pn ee qe~,,..;n a mow.. q..een menNemunn d ~" 'r;"~, °eqO re 11e, Lam. konaoM -Ri 15 EMCV;aVene TREE 17EE'n:~T ~':_AE TKE I 5ZE GARDE 1J' PALM 1J" PALM ] T~OpTA~L FpLM TREES REMDKD © q PLANT LS7 L Annewm nom.mm~.n.m apn Pe m 1q~-rr e r vymmeenne e.gen Ap.eiaw Rerm~ Ie'-va c r xJR u~.l+a 1rT.1 ~m, 1f o ~rz,cr N1.IS7A00ERE0 ? evaoe• o acme Dels rrr.l ~BSM •ue~~QUrto w~3(z;rt.), z_5'oc. p~ ]e Ro Frompmvm Axeiee. nurummeAeelea.3 WL,15 oe. qe~~ r- ~~~.~ .~L ~=. "_~ r ~ ~~ Y n ~ ~ m cn m cn z O ~ O ~ t< ~ u:_ P• > m ~ S N ~ _ - m ~ Q ca z 0 ~_ ~ a w rz a 4V F L~.. ~ z ~ ~~ Y @Qg~ Y 7 OF 7 °z 1~~ S~ U ,;U! 2 9 L.. ~ COLOR LEGEND: ~«„~M..." ,o.~, O I P J i~;p+`'~i ~' ~ir ~ C it.irf~J:~iVT'SVCS 1 -BUILDING COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW153 OFF WHITE" «" ~ ~ ~ ~- ~~ ` ~~"}> -`' ~ 2 -BUILDING BASE COLOR: SCOTT PAINT #8235 ~ ~~ ~ ~ 3 - FASCIANVINDOW TRIM COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW 154 '""°" "° ~ - 4 -ROOF MATERIAL: GLAZED TILE -SCOTT PAINT #7785 O 5 -RAILINGS/BALUSTERS: SCOTT PAINT OW154 ----- NOTE: 4 ~ ~ ® FOR COLOR SAMPLES REFER TO EXTERIOR BUILDING . `a _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ COLOR ATTACHMENT $=~@I,' ±~,4g.~ ~``4 =i ~ RAILING ~ -- - ~ ~ji~~: ~~~°;f6 - ii i s,;I, 4 ----- {f4{3~j n 4- 3g ® ~ NORTH ELEVATION 'I'i"g ;~ - ----- g~_-..pµ~-~~ 4 SCALE: 118"-1'-0" ~e~3f a n i m~uuurcaw / ~;;1°f MrtING '~ gf" 3'~ l:fig~g ii : _____ _ ~ @"~i; je. -t ~~''''gg~~''~~ ii=i°-: 4 ICJ ~ ~ ~ s.gft~° ----- O Iii allll~l) ~~ ~i ,,.,,e.,., _~-,~~~_ O O _ ~.~ ~K _ _ O ``' =<,,.H, ------- .. _ _. COLOR LEGEND: .,,,,,,~,,,a : - --_--- -_~- -_- _ f ..-- ~ ~ 1 -BUILDING COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW153 OFF WHITE" z a 2 -BUILDING BASE COLOR: SCOTT PAINT #8235 ~ ~ I O I ® i~g~ Z ~ o 3 - FASCIAiWINDOW TRIM COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW154 - [~ ° ~- 4 -ROOF MATERIAL: GLAZED TILE -SCOTT PAINT #7785 - --"" -Q v a ~ ~`rI ~ I WWI 5- RAILINGSlBALUSTERS: SCOTT PAINT OW154 ® ~ Z r ---- ~ a m 1 I i i I W~~ ,z wuMauM~.l Q NOTE: ""~N10 - ~'I` ® ® N FOR COLOR SAMPLES REFER TO EXTERIOR BUILDING ~ ~ I j 11 0 COLOR ATTACHMENT - - - - ~ ~-----~--~~ --~~ ~ 0 1 w _ I~ ~ ii~ i ~T~ ~ z ---- ~ i - - ~ b ~_ J m ____ EAST ELEVATION ___-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' l ~ SCALE: 118"=1'-0" O O O ,r MUYWUM O _ ~ _ MLLRIG A ------- 1 COLORIEGEND: a ~ Q `t, O °"""""""^"°"°°' 1 -BUILDING COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW753 OFF WHITE" E _,____~ O~ - ~_ 2 -BUILDING BASE COLOR: SCOTT PAINT #8235 O ', ~ O 3 - FASCIAlWINDOW TRIM COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW154 - - -- 4 -ROOF MATERIAL: GLAZED TILE -SCOTT PAINT #7785 O 5 -RAILINGS/BALUSTERS: SCOTT PAINT OW154 ® 8 ~ ~ - --- ~ ~ ~ NOTE: FOR COLOR SAMPLES REFER TO EXTERIOR BUILDING , ----- O n COLOR ATTACHMENT a113?P f4~ Cj ';i r ; ~~j~l~l ----- ~ - ~ O ?41t~f ;!~~,.°s ' ;`: 't ''' ` WEST ELEVATION z,- ~` „~@~l ----- _ SCALE: 118"=1'-0" °+a.z s., , it ~ .4+i O ~ r,. r rye ~j1 .~ rIn$si~ nx+c 4.4~91j i t 1lr~l} e i~~ll wcnave - O O ~'~°-~~° - - - ..,a, ~5._ - _ .. f~-.,x.- - ...«...,.K. ,.. _ u_ ------ O / ~ ucw.me.u~s.nv"m 4 7 COLOR LEGEND: O O ~, ~ O ~ 1 -BUILDING COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW153 OFF WHITE" - - - z o O O ,: µ~ ~„ 0 ~ a 2 -BUILDING BASE COLOR: SCOTT PAINT #8235 w 3 - FASCIANVINDOW TRIM COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW154 ® n I IIO ® $ rt r~i 4 -ROOF MATERIAL: GLAZED TILE -SCOTT PAINT #7785 - - - - - ~_'! it ~ i~.!I~ 'tit r - ( I ~ a ~ 5 -RAILINGS/BALUSTERS: SCOTT PAINT OW154 t ~ m ® O f ~ ~, `, I ~- i i I ~ ~ ` ~ .n n r ~ ~i~I. w i~ .,. .~ :~~ . I z t8 v ---- NOTE: _ - , .._. 4 ~ ~ ~, I ~~i _ II ~I~' FOR COLOR SAMPLES REFER TO EXTERIOR BUILDING ~ ~} ~ ;i I I; I if f' ~ ~''I ~ ~ ~~ ~ , ~ COLOR ATTACHMENT `~ - - - - O Il a O i II I~` ~ J : I,, ~~. ~ _ s ~~ ~ --_-- o -- _ ~~~~~ - ® ® °,I EE~-1 m - ii;, ~ ~ r awnµw `' `. ~ ~ ® ~ ® iuaxs '~ ( A r :~ . ~ _ nr - ; ~~~i~~A~~Or~~vcs - ~~ - o 0 0 SCALE: t/8°=1'-0" .~ .....,~, 1.1 ....,.- ~a 'w .0 :Y _... ~/~ _ n.15M' 1N '1 Q~ ~ t~ ~ ~- ~~ ~~"' ( BAY ESPLANADE i '- ~ ' j~+~ _ STORAGE 1 r• IV U (i tJ ( ~ III i ' ~Z r~'_ _. j /f SIDEWALK ~ SETBACK ~~ [~ ~ i ... o i ~~ `"' Q _ ~ ~ STORAGE ~ I, t~l ~i°l. f ~ `~____ ~! ` 41 ~s ... ~ . - ~'~ mio m '/ - SIDEWAII( ~ ~ ~~ i ~R ~ ~- , 2 CAR GARA E I a ~f~-t~~ - --~ ~ ~ ~°~ ?:,: } ~. w 22 ~~" BETBAOK 1 LOBBY --- - UI O i ', 1 ~ - ~ ,b l~ {I J, U { ~~ ~ ~ 2CAR GARAGE ~~I- 7 i - 28'-0 v ~ ~ TRASH ROOM / 7~ N - ~~ iS_t),~ POOL ~ Zp yq. O EQUIP S6T ~ \ '~~ \/~ ~ \ / i CAR `! Z 0 GARAGE i ~ W ~ / O ~ O \ SPA / 2 Z a ~~ ----- ~~ ~ 0 5 a: q, rvi W tai! h ail ~ ~ Z Q KQ 2 CAR GARAG ~ \' a m W i / W ~ i ~ Z i0 U I ,~ ~ ~ i _._- -_ COMMUNITY ROOM STORAGE ~' ~~ BETBAOK 2 CAR GARAGE ~- 58,~. ~ STORAGE M ~ ;' E Z ~ ~ g a -- ~ --- POOLDECK ~ i ~~ 1 ..._. .._..._.. __ _..._ _.. _. N o ;~ ~\ / \ ~ SITE PLAN I ~ DOOK ~~8~~_.~~.On =+~~ (VERIFY)\ a - .. .. a+v~v roxi .o t Q .-{z -GG~ 4.. J L u ~~ ~ ~.r. ~ . V U U J ~ f.. ,~ ~~ wj ~~ l Y ~ ~'-"' w ~ u. ~' ~_ ~ r -..--~-'-~ I ', O LL ~° ~ O O w o /J d' OF m0 / ¢ a. ~- ~I vFi J i> ~J J 0 m ~~ ~-~ ~d TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN -LEVEL 1 __ ___ -- - SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" '„ r. ~ ~,,,'~ ._ .~ LEVEL 2 PLAN - 4227 S.F. SCALE: 1116"=1'-0" ~`f" >--g -°~ e - of ~_ - ~ ~ _. ~~_ ~. ~ ~~ SCALE: 1 / 16"=1'-0" 7~ z o oZo °gw ~wQ wmQ a °o LL »A 3 LEVEL 3 & 4 PLAN - 4227 S.F. ~ _ ___... --T ~ _ ` ~~ ~~ A >S i ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ -_::~: 4 __ I I i # £1 - Y IS a y I... ~:iNe~ I~ i l~• ~~. •, . ~ ~~ ~ ~. __ _; ~ ` / ~ _ LEVATOR ~._._....._..__....__. h ~ '~ i i \\ •.~~~ ~@OOM \ ., .. _.._.__ LEVELS 5 & 6 PLAN - 4227 S.F EACH UNIT. _ _ SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" i ~'j ;~ ,/ > zo ~ w ~ ,~ o°a° z 2 LL 'O / /~ ~~~ Z ( /f wm~ ~~ ~_ -_~ Q ,~. ~°° `= - ~ / 3 ~~ r-, ~ g r ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ `" ° v ~ ~ --_ J ROOF PLAN 3 '~~ - SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" U. t T„y - -_.--~_.~_.._._..._ ~~ u,~ u „A 3.1 • NEPENTHE EXTERIOR BUILDING COLORS 1 2 3 4 5 BUILDING COLOR SCOTT PAINT OW153 DOFF WHITE" BUILDING TRIM COLOR AND BASE COLOR SCOTT PAINT #8235 FASCIA/ WINDOW TRIM SCOTT PAINT OW154 DOFF WHITE" ROOF MATERIAL GLAZED TILE SCOTT PAINT #7785 RAILING /BALUSTER SCOTT PAINT OW154 DOFF WHITE" e- ,, ~~ .;UE 2 v Z(!05 pLpN r: ~. • ~~ . ~. _~. ~~ i a Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning August 9, 2005 Mr. Robert G. Teft City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: 665 BAY ESPLANADE FLD 2005-07078 Dear Mr. Teft: ~~ 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727)793-9888 Phone (727)793-9855 Fax keith(c~keithzayac. com EB 9351 LC26000212 Enclosed please find 15 sets of information addressing comments received per your August 5, 2005 letter including the following: 1. The required setbacks have been shown on the site plan and landscape plan. 2. The name of the abutting street has been darkened and shown on the site plan and landscape plan. 3. The architectural plans have been revised to identify materials proposed and additional detail regarding roof and railings. 4. An additional request has been added to Attachment A requesting a side setback reduction from 10 feet to 9.21 feet to pavement. 5. Exhibit B has been added. 6. Exhibit C has been completed. 7. The Transfer of Density Rights application has been revised to add the building height. 8. The recorded plat for the property has been included in the application. ~~ann~d~~~ ~~ urn ~~~da~a ~N~N~ Soot s o ~~ ~~ ~i~13a321 ~ ~ ATTACHMENT A DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • Resubmittal of approved site plan to add additional property and expand project. • Transfer of density from off-site property. • Reduce west rear wood deck setback from 20 feet to 0 feet minimum. • Reduce north side setback from 10 feet to 9.21 feet to pavement. • Increase building height from 35 feet to 68'-11"feet (FEMA to roof slab). RECEIVED . r, " ~~`~ ~i~ ~~~°~~,~Rr~~ OF ~~EgIp~VA 0 °_ Clearwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 CASE #: ~L~7 ~~~~ " ~ ~~7~ DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1 }collated, 2) stapled and 3} folded sets of site plans !~1 SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE 1 205.00 '~ NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised o4-O5-o5) PLEASE TYPE OR PRiNT~ A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Robert Pennock 8 Paul Kellev MAILING ADDRESS: 665 Bay Esplanade Clearwater FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727.441-1475 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S}: Melodie A. Ferguson Revocable living Trot Agreement DTD, Robert M. Pennock II Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, Paul & Tracey Kellev (Must indude ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Keith E Zayac P E RLA MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterarise Rd E Ste 404 Safety Harbor Ft_. 34695 PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) - U ~ l,~ (~~ e j 1 E 1 !~ Ei !, STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 865 8667 Ba Es lanade Clearwater FL. 33767 i J °.~` f LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See a ched surve (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) I .J'J e~, ~ PARCEL NUMBER: 05J29J15J54756/077/0060 05/29/15l54756lOO7J0070 PLANN!'3i3 ~" ~`}- ~ ` " { + PARCEL SIZE: 0 52 acres• 22 895.86 SF (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 12 Multi -Family condominium Units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attachment A for requests Attadi sheets and be spedfic when identifying the request (indude all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES X NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C, PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see age 6) D. !~ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL. REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6} GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attachment B for responses to items 1-6 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. ~ ~ r~'' i 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. rU~ 2 ~ ~ ~! ~ ~ y${ 11th{"_~ y y~ ;~ *f !{ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ~` Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain v ~- how each criteria is ach~ved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations ftom the use, intensity and development standards. See attachment C for response to application flexibility criteria Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) ~~ ~ ~ 3. ~ The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible wfth adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable}. Use separate sheets as necessary. Page 3 of ~ -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. A-I applications that inr addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Desl~n Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ~-. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: ~ro _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; _ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; _ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area inGuding top of bank, tce of slope and outfit control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan incuding all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. _ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ~,,, COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ~-Acknowledgement of stomtwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stomtwater plan as noted above is included Stomtwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727} 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around fhe existing trees; '~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; .`~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; !^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; j G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ,-~, c r ~ -~ ~ SITE PLAN wkh the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ~ C~ ~` ~ , ~ ~ ~f ~ ~ _, All dimensions; ---~: ' _ North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ~~~ _ location map; _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buidings and structures; _ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; r~ jN ~. ~ ; , _;~ i+,~ ~ _ All required setbacks; ~ ~ ' _ All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; _ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _ Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; I t ~~ t SYCS Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lifl stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and atl required screening {per Section 3-201(D){i) and Index #701}; _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. d ~ ~ SITE DATA TRBLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenftabular form: ~ Land area in square feet and acres; ~ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; ~( Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; ~~ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; x Offidal records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; ~t Building and structure heights; ~ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and { Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) and color rendering if possible; ~-'~ _ ~ ~~ D 0 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: ; ,, _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; ~,~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~, Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ~,; j' All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Q lvlivr~ ,~ ~ . t, I ; ;~ , , ~ i ~'J~;, I, ~ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); rt7~ ; _ .~ .:.~~ ,a Streets and drives {dimensioned}; % Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; _ Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8a DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 41102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: ~! All existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; x Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ~ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ~ Sight visibility triangles; a. Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; ~ Proposed and required parking spaces; °' Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by speces, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or Zabel) indicating the size, description, spedfications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and k~mmon names; °° Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; ~ Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, badkfilling, mulching and protective measures; ~ Interior landscaping areas hatched andtor shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; _ Conditions of a previous development approval {e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) (color rendering if possible); ~.. IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approvap; ~ ~'/(,} ~~~ y trT-~„f ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application inches a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevebpment Project or a Residerrtial Infill Project. QB., BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings inGuding height dimensions, colors and materials; {~, REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with Coors and materials to scale (8'h X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ~~~~~~"('~ ~~ ~ ~~) a;.~~,~ ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details inGuding location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable {separate application and fee required}. ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'h X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or 'rf the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportab~ accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a `Scoping Meeting° held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Ac/kno~wledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applipnt must initial one of the following): S'am' Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ti~iV,~A~'T'tcj~ (J~L`~ ~'~,UG~ Traffic Impact Study is not required. ~ }~G-~~ (l.~'Z- "'j~~ -~' CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. s; Jug 2 ~ ~ ~~ L. SIGNATURE: ~ ~ ~ ; ~'~CS~ PIAN,:. w, ~ z;~ . ~ , , iEYt~ ~::, ~R,~. m C : . ~ I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representa ions made in (his li ti th f l t d t t b t k d d STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS C~ f ~~ / f app on are rue an a r my ca e o e es o now e ge an S om to and subscribed ore me this be day o authorize City repre ntativ to visit and photograph the property A.D. 20~z to me and/or by is who is personally known has produced ~i_ ~ ~ as ~- identification. r Signature of presentative ~ Not ry public, ,err gnne M. Fban My commission expires: ;P ..,,,,,,,,,,_:__:__ .,.,,..,.,.,.... _ Expires February 12, 2008 M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AG Melodie A. Ferguson Revocable Living Trust DTD; Robert M Pennock 11 Revocable living Trust DTD; Paul >3~ Tracey Kelley (Names of At_l property owners on deed -please PRINT full names) 1. That (1 am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (add ress or general location): 6&5 8 t36T Bay Esplanade 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) F-~ ~ i ~, p 12 Multi-family condominium development 1 ~ ~,,,~ 3. That the undersigned (haslhave} appointed and (doestdo) appoint: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be pa id PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is an co Prope Owner ~ ~ Pr r X/ ~ _- / iZ~'~,~v ~~..~ ~" roperty Ow er I Property ner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PiNEL1AS p ~ Befo/ `,me the unders!'~ned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State o FloridaL~,o~"n th}'~ 0~0~ personally appeared P U iCCI) f t~~C Dui: r~'f B ~f~ ~} oC Q day of who having been first duly sworn T , Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. CtOd tt FlP9uSUYt My Commission Expires: ~ ~pZ10 ~ ~ 10 .~.~,.,~,~ ,p~'r~, GINA L CANOPARI °~ MYOOMMtSSIONrO DDOBGZ70 ~ y~ Notary ublic _ `' \ ~ ~ ~n c'C, ~ ~~~ ~'' ~ ; ~ ~~ ~""`""~ ~ ~Orf~` EXP-RES:lanusry26.22~116 { ~ ~~ ~: v-~rannrng uepa~nrwppucarron rormsraeveropmenr revrew~wmprenensrve rnnn ieneveroprrrenr FH~r app+rt;arrurr~ r~~~~~. ~ ~, ~. _y ` , . r ; ~ ~ J,f ~~ ,..__ . CITY a^:.:: ~, c.,;,Y~r. _ -c, Page 7 of 7 -Flexible Development Application -Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater • • ATTACHMENT A DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • Resubmittal of approved site plan to add additional property and expand project. • Transfer of density from off-site property. • Reduce rear wood deck setback from 20 feet to 0 feet minimum. • Increase building height from 35 feet to 68'-11" feet (FEMA to roof slab). ORIGINAi. o~sa~ET~ .o .~~~ct~r ~~~~ ~~s. ~~ ,~~ ~~_~~ t x • CRIGINAi_ ATTACHMENT B GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent properties. The proposed project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach with the proposed Mediterranean architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain the small-scale multi-family character of the neighborhood. The project does not deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed 12 condominium. units. The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The project is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the two previously approved LaRisa I and LaRisa II projects 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of other properties on Bay Esplanade, and set a positive example for the redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by the development of the project. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The 12 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and is under the 7.5 units! acre density allowed. There are no proposed uses other than residential that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion The parking is designed within a fully enclosed parking garage that is accessed by one 24-foot wide driveway. There is no proposed on street parking associated with the project. The proposed 24 parking spaces exceed the required 18 parking spaces required by code. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. i ~~ ~ ~., rC~ ~ nn r ~~;K~ ;~ ;! ', ~ ~. ~..t,; -.>~ ~_ 4 • Vhi~~~V/aL The surrounding parcels along Bay Esplanade are primarily multi-family apartment developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity by conforming with Mediterranean flavor suggested by City code. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. The project minimizes the acoustic and olfactory impacts of the project by planting landscape buffers and the use of a parking garage with no exterior parking. The project only contains 12 residential units, and will not include any commercial or other businesses. ~~~~~ ;,a ~ ~~~! ~I -~ c C ATTACHMENT C RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and development standards. The applicant is requesting an increase in height from 30'-0" to 68'-11"feet and a reduction of the rear setback to a wood deck. The market value of the property and construction costs require development of a certain number of units to be economically viable and still include the enhanced architectural upgrades required by City code. The rear of the building includes a pool and wood decking, which require a rear setback deviation. The remaining open space, which exceeds code minimum, is heavily landscaped with minimal grass to offset the requested setback deviation. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting properties. Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will be enhanced by the development of this project. The adjacent properties are older apartments and multi-family structures. The construction of a new condominium building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting properties, as well as increase the fair market value. The anticipated sale costs of each unit are well in excess of $500,000, which will increase the property values of the neighborhood. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The proposed request for condominiums is consistent with both the existing zoning and future land use of the subject property and adjoining parcels. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed use of the property is consistent with adjacent land uses as multi- family. The recently approved developments near this project along with the existing uses of the surrounding land uses are generally multi-family. The use is consistent with the City tourist zoning designation and County Future Land Use designation B .,1~ 6 ( r~ r 5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The applicants of this project have lived on this property for some time and are the owners of the property. They are committed to develop their property to its best and highest use that is compatible with recently approved developments in the area. This development is possible since the property is currently owned by the developer and land costs due to other approved projects make the development impractical in other areas. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity consists of older multi-family structures, several of which will be torn down to construct recently approved projects. The development of this project will upgrade the surrounding building appearances by using Mediterranean themed architecture, as well as a fully landscaped property with palm trees and shrubs. The project also eliminates perpendicular parking from the public road, which is still currently in use on the immediately adjacent properties. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed investment made in the property by removal of older buildings and c-~ -~--~ replacing with new construction will benefit the immediate area aesthetically, ~r~ increase the property values of adjacent property, stimulate the redevelopment of ~ ~:~-~-. adjacent property, and provide a viable to increase the tax base of the City. ~ ~; 3~ ,~,y ""`:~, LLS L! { The aesthetic character of the community will also be enhanced by the `'`'° ~~ architecture of the building with fully landscaped grounds. The landscaping ~ ~ ~ ~~ includes a combination of palms, trees and shrubs, which fully encompass the s~.r~ "=~~ ~~ property. The rear of the property will include a modest pool surrounded by architectural. pavers. c 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Flexibility in regard to required rear setback and height increase are requested for this project. The property has been owned for a long duration of time by the applicant and is working with their existing property constraints to create a project r ~~ , `~ ~ `? ~ , ~ ~- ~~ that fits the property and is consistent with other recently approved projects within the area. The existing immediate vicinity currently utilizes backout parking within the right of way, which severely limits the capacity of the existing roadway. The proposed project proposes to take the parking and move it all into a fully enclosed parking garage under the living units. This will enhance the capacity of the existing roadway and eliminate the visual degradation of the area by exterior parking. The requested setback flexibility is offset by the landscape package. The landscaping in the existing vicinity is very limited and is severely stressed in many cases. This property has proposed landscaping in all open space areas except for the required sodded stormwater treatment ponds. The landscaping includes taller palm trees, intermediate shrubs and lower groundcover that surrounds the building and mitigates for the setback flexibility. The building height is offset by the stepped facade of the building along with the enhanced Mediterranean theme. The current architecture of the vicinity is dated without the City preferred Mediterranean theme. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required parking per standard code would be provided on-site. 10. The design of alt buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable) The "Old Florida" district is an area of transition between resorts and low intensity. The mix of uses favor residential rather than retail. Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing buildings and should be low to mid-rise. Lack of parking hinders revitalization of existing improvements particularly on Bay Esplanade. The proposed building consists of aloes-density four unit multi-family project and does not include any retail uses. The density of the project is less than required """"' by the Tourist district and with only 12 units is below several of the existing ~ apartment developments in the surrounding area. The building being 68-` 11" above FEMA to midroof would generally be considered as amid-rise building consistent with other recently approved projects which have set a standard of development. The project includes all required parking on-site and within the ~' building to revitalize the integrity and capacity of Bay Esplanade. ~, +-cs: ~°;~, ew, ~ . r.~ ., .' {~ • • SnIGiN;i~ The architecture of the building is generally Mediterranean in nature, which is consistent with the remainder of the tourist district with significant undulating architectural features. The architecture is enhanced by the proposed palm trees, which soften the corners of the building and provide a vegetative scale to the structure. The colors of the building are consistent with the recently approved projects along the beach and do not include any wild or obtrusive colors. ~.n _ ~ C~ C~ Q ~ ~~ ~`~ D ~~ ~~~r~~r~~ ~ ~~~v~~~ ~..,~ , ~ Svcs cent c~- ~, ~ _ . ~ _ _ _ ~ " ~ ' F. DE ~, CLERK. DF CDE~T .~~ PAGES ~~., - PI~LLAS C~J(~~TY, FLORIDA ,f 1`~ -A.~;CT' REC ,~~ a~~s _-~ C~ ~, INT FEES P!C ~~ . -. -. M~G.S.5~b 05-2~-20fl2 Ibcf7:23 ~f 5I OED-FE~3I~{,RO9ERT R I30D~r.,O I#:02f9919R BK:f2022 SPG: '' ? EFD:~.~ _ REL~1kl3I~iG 003 F f Sf5. Da DDC STAMP - DR2f9 3 S.7a REV y , . TOTAL: TOTAE. _ CK P.r4T.TE~]D: - CK BAL ~; CHG Afa7' _ -. _ Bx~~~~~.__ DEPUTY CLERK 02-189199 MRY-28-2002 4 P 1NEL~FiS CO BK 12022 PG THIS WARRANTY DEED made this.:;~~'~'~ day of , A. D. 2002, between ROBERT M. PENNEgCK,,{a` single man, and LODIE A. FERGUSON, a single woman, of the County of Pinellas, in the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 665 Bay Esplanade, #3, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767,. party of the first part, and MELODIE A. FERGUSON, as Trustee, under~hgr~ement dated May 24 , 2002, made by MELODIE A. FERGUSON, a~..G~antor, of the County of Pinellas in the State of Florida, patty. of the second part, whose mailing address is 665 Bay Esp~an~.de;~#3, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767; WITNESSETH, That~~th~, s;~id party of the first part, for and in consideration of the ~~una~~~o`f ;rTen Dollars and other good and valuable considerations, to izim'~I,.n ii~and paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt wMe~reof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold; ttp 'the said party of the second part, his heirs and assigns for~ve~,~`th~e fallowing described land, situate, lying and being in the.. Cbitrtt~r of Pinellas, State of Florida, to-wit: A TWENTY~~`~V~`-;,,;PERCENT INTEREST IN AND TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBBD RBAL PROPERTY: Lot 6:y ;'`B2.ock'' 77, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, according to plat thereo~;`~~ecorded in Plat Book ~0, Page 27, Public Records of P_ella~s County, Florida. 5u~ij~~ec~ to easements and restrictions of record and taxes for the gear} 2002 and subsequent years. The~`~Grantor of the referenced trust confirms that under the teraiis ~o~ gaid Trust, Grantor has retained a beneficial interest for li~e..a~.ti~is entitled to a homestead exemption pursuant to the p~ovi~~ioi~s of Florida Statute 196.041, ar successor statute. `.This transfer involves no monetary consideration and there is ,rYo s~33.~'ting of the economic burden, This deed is not subject to do~umsntary stamps because the Grantor is the sole beneficiary of the trust during the Granter's lifetime. X15.70 X15.70 t.00 1 ?pM _ 2217 -. _ rH!$ iNSTAUMENT PREPARQ} BY{& t~TL~1A14~} ~,~. L30NAL,D R HALL, A'FIY GtOZA Aim HALL, PA i ~~ ~ 2 Q 28050 U.S. FLWY.1flIV.,$Ut~4Q2 . ' GLEARWA'i'R'R, F!. i3?~lL~4 ;_r /'r - PINECCRS COUNTY FAR. *_ OFF .F2EC .SK 12[122 PG 2218 ~ a~ ~ ~ ' t m ., ~~~ ' , The said party of the first part does;. hereby fully warrant the title to said land, ,and will defend~~ tiie ~ same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. Wherever used herein, the ter~rt .party" shall include the heirs, personal representatives, $tccessors and/or assigns of the respective parties hereto; the „~s+3 ~`oc~;'the singular number shall include the plural, and the pl:ura~.~;-the singular; the use of any gender shall include all gende~s~..;: ~ ';where used herein, the terms _ . "Grantor", "Grantee" and "Trustee!:'shall be construed as singular or plural as the text requires:':, • The Grantee shall have the,•independent power and authority to protect, conserve, and tq ~s$11; .: or to lease, or to encumber, or otherwise to manage and di~spose~of the real property conveyed by this deed, pursuant to""- -•~F,lbrf,da Statute 689.071, or successor statute. :.~ Any Successor :Tic>~s~e~s are hereby granted the power to protect, conserve ani~, to;:.sell, or to lease, or to encumber, or otherwise to manage`"and•,.,d~.~spose of the real property described in this deed. ~ _ The powers;bf°,.•the,Trustees and all Successor Trustees shall extend to any ar~d''~i13`rights which the Grantor possesses in the above-described;~,~eai.. property; any deed, mortgage, ar other instrument eXeC~3ti~cl...: ~by the Trustee shall convey all rights or interests of.:•~the,~Grantor including homestead; and the Trustee is appointed as tf~e attorney-in-fact for the Grantor to carry out this intent, whc~~;:appointment shall be durable and shall not be affected lig the incapacity of the Grantor. Any,pei~'oxi dealing with the Trustee shall deal with said _ Trustee. 'and ~<any successor Trustees as provided in the Trust Agreem~i~t::.:~However, no person shall deal with a Successor Trustee until:`. o~ie :,or more of the following have been received by said __ perscxi:; ozt• .placed of record in the aforementioned county: ,~ --.A•.~ ° The written resignation of the prior Trustee sworn to and acknowledged before a notary public. ~:~B; A certified death certificate of the prior Trustee. `~'`C. The order of a court of competent jurisdiction adjudicating the prior Trustee incompetent, or removing said Trustee for any reason. :~:~~ r~~~~~J i i ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ PLAt~i~.N~a & C7EV~LOP~~DJT SVC~~ _. C~ tTY {~ CL~;~Af~tAI.~R t -~ P IHE~L(~S CIItSNTY FER . -- - -= 0~'F' , REC . BK 12022 PG 2218 ~~'- - ~r • • I FiEREB`Y:`CE~:2'~."IFY That on this day personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take ac- knowledgments.-:'••;2O8ERT M. PENNOCK, a single man, and MELODIE A. FERGU5ON, ~ .;s•~.zigl~ woman, who are personally known to me or who have produrreci a Florida Driver's License as identification, and who executed,.the~•,foregoing deed, and they acknowledged before me that they executec].'~-the same freely and voluntarily for the purposes therein:: expl~e~sed. Y3ITNE55 my hand and official seal at Clea ester, County of Pin~l~.~c,'~~nd State of Florid his ~-"F day of _, A. D. 200;2. . .... ~~,. ~:~'"~~ Danatd R Hatt Notary 1 i c .. .,~;X~~ MY COMMtSSiON #~ CC855tf 1 p(p . ~,~~.. vembe~ 1~, 20G3 ~ My commission Expires TaorFar+wc~ ~c D. The written certificates of..` two 'physicians currently practicing medicine that the.~Tru~tee is physically or mentally incapable of handl3.~ng~.the duties of Trustee. E. The written removal of a `~5u.cc~ssor Trustee andjor the appointment of an additio~ia~: ~~.;5uccessor Trustee., sworn to and acknowledged before: ~°'nota>_'Y public. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the rs~tfd-;,party of the first part has hereunto set his hand and seal' the:;c~.ay and year first above writ- ten. ' ed, Sealed and Delivered in t e Presence of: //'' pp G~~~t .C,~-~,...,~`'"" (SEAL) Q.,,~ ~ . ~~,~~« Robert M. Pennock -~~,~~ ,~ ,,.sb,:,,,;,~ri= - Mel die A. Fer son WITNESSES AS TO BO'~'Ii~ ..PTZES STATE OF FLORIDA' ~~~ ,~ .,. COUNTY OF PINELS `-,` """ This deed has been prepared at the Grantor's without examination or legal opinion of ti request .D C~f~~IvUC~ ~. II ;~ ....~, ~~~r~f~~ ~ ~rr~~~c~~~ ~~ r s+~r~~~ - ,fir . ~ - ~~ F JE B€ AKfR CL E1~C ~ C01~2T ~~~ .. <'~ . . . r FIl~LLAS IaC~ITY: Fi_t~'IBA PAGES 3 ;~ . _Vs ,_,... ~ ACxT N~.I~808 0~-2--2002 .f~:20:49 G~i - ..~~..~~..~~..~~++ s ~`~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ `1 51 DED-FE~r3~5Eh'3 M a u ~ DR2 9 --~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ 176 -~ _ _ I#:02.~.9'~c1.1. $K:12422 5~ti:7~Ei E~"L'2% uvr __ . RECQ><BII~ 4~ FAt~fi i `15.44 - FEES ~____~_. ~ ~ ._ DQC 5TA~' - DI~19 3 Ib.74 MTF _ ~ _W..,--~ - P!C Rev ~ TDT~: 515,?0 _ CF~CK A~iT.TfNDE~ED: X15.74 ~X~~~ - CK BAS --=-" _DEEIITY ~..tiRK Ct~G A1~4T „====i 02-1992 1 1 MRY-2 _~ '--_ - _. ~; ~: P INELLA5 CQ 8K $ D222 PG P285 ~_.~- ~~Y~: - 11~1tltttlt_tttt~tl~1llllltllltt81it11~11N1 ' THIS WARRANTY DEED made phis.. '~-'`'~ day of s~W , A. D. 2002, between ROBERT M. PENNt)C~,}~; s ngle man, and MELODIE A. - FERGUSON, a single woman, of tf~e County of Pinellas, in the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 665 Bay Esplanade, #3, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767, party of the first part, and ROBERT M. PENNOCK, II, as Trustee, :un~ler,~'agreement dated -~X...2t~_, 2002, made by ROBERT M. PENNOCK,~`~~as` 6r~ntor, of the County of Pinellas in the State of Florida,,paztg cs~f the second part, whose mailing address is 665 Bay Esplanacle;:~'#3, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767; WITNESSETFI, That~~the s~.id party of the first part, for and in consideration of the `$u~oi•~~f ;Ten Dollars and other goad and valuable considerations, to ~ita~'=in '~~and paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt'WYier~ofi is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold ~ th'e said party of the second part, his heirs and assigns fore~r,ex,`th~ following described land, situate, lying and being in ths. Ctalx~nt~ of Pinellas, State of Florida, to-wit: A SEVENTY-~~'~~,.,. PERCENT INTEREST IN AND TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY: Lot 6:, ; Blci~>~` 77, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, according to plat thereof;~~ecbrded in Plat Book 20, Page 27, Public Records of P~.ici~lla,s County, Florida. ~.... Suri ,ems to~easements and restrictions of record and taxes for the Y+~ar2002 and subsequent years. The~~Grantor of the referenced trust confirms that under the ter~t(s '~i~ sa>id Trust, Grantor has retained a beneficial interest for li~e..a~r~-is entitled to a homestead exemption pursuant to the prov~.s.iohs of Florida Statute 196.041, or successor statute. ^`~~This transfer involves no monetary consideration and there is rto srii,fting of the economic burden, This deed 'is not subject to docusaantary stamps because the Grantor is the sole beneficiary of the trust during the Grantor's lifetime. ~iS IN$TFtpAOEt~'Y PREPARID DY(& EiE1t~i Y'~3} d01dAi.D S3. FtAll, AIRl~tr ~OZA AND HALL, P.A. 2EOSaa.s.Hwtf ista.,su[r~ta~ ~wwxr~, Ft s~r~t~ ,,r The said party of the first part :does: hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend: tae,--° same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. P INELLFiS COUNTY FLA , -- OFF.REC.BK 12022 PG 2287 ~ qk. ~ ., L ~ Vii, n Wherever used herein, the :~ '!party" shall include the heirs, personal representatives, ~succes~ors and/or assigns of the respective parties hereto; the ..use of,°~ the singular number shall include the plural, and the pTu~,ei~::;the singular; the use of any gender shall include ali gend~ars.~:Where used herein, the terms "Grantor", "Grantee" and "Trustee!! shall be construed as singular or plural as the text requires:`....,,...,: The Grantee shall have.the:.independent power and authority to protect, conserve, and to eelT,~:or to lease, or to encumber, or otherwise .to manage and d~`spose~~of the real property conveyed by this deed, pursuant to'~°~~ori.da Statute 689.071, or successor statute. Any Successor Trustees are hereby granted the power to protect, conserve anc~-., to;•_sell, or to lease, or to encumber, or otherwise to managg' aid:°~;dispose of the real property described in this deed, The powers;'~t'~.,the.Trustees and all Successor Trustees sha21 extend to any and ~a,il" rights which the Grantor possesses in the above-describecl.~.~ea~;: property; any deed, mortgage, or other instrument e~ecut~d'-~iby the Trustee shall convey all rights or interests of,.°~the<Grantor including homestead; and the Trustee is appointed as~ a~ attorney-in-fact for the Grantor to carry out this intent, wh~ic~~ .,~ap~iointment shall be durable and shall not be affected by,~h.~ incapacity of the Grantor. And ,persi~ri dealing with the Trustee shall deal with said Trustee: ~tncl; any successor Trustees as provided in the Trust Agreemer~t.~~.Hawever, no person shall deal with a Successor Trustee until<.ohe~:or more of the following have been received by said person.:.:;pr'~placed of record in the aforementioned county: ~:;~--~.`~r..,. The written resignation of the prior Trustee sworn to and '` acknowledged before a notary public. ,; _. ,`~?B~ A certified death certificate of the prior Trustee. '~°''C. The order of a court of competent jurisdiction adjudicating the prior Trustee incompetent, or removing said Trustee far any reason. .rte L`J t~~ 1...4 ~~~ ~.~„Y ~ ~~' i ,~~~~ 4 ~ Li. ~ § ~' j ~"411i'f ~//~'~l~~~V~~.$.lJ ~ L1~YCLLIE-+Y~t. ~-~~~ ~1,~1.~ { 5ay,ww,..o.-ti.Mt 6 ~ ~~`ti. ~,.. -_ _ ~ p It•(ELZRS COLIN7Y F'LA . OFF . REC . 8!C 12022 PG 2288 ~ ~ - . ~~ ~ ~ ~ E k ~: t' ~ D. The written certificates of'..~wQ~'~`physicians currently practicing medicine that the ~•.~riist~ee is physically or mentally incapable of hand~:~ia~g'~:the duties of Trustee. E. The written removal of a..`Suc~essor Trustee and/ar the appointment of an additi~inal •,Su~cesgor Trustee, sworn to and acknowledged before:' a°'hp~ary public. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the:ss'~~d°?;party of the first part has hereunto set his hand and seal ~he;c~;ay and year first above writ- ten. S ed, Sealed and Delivered n he Presence of: u~ ' ~- {sEAL~ . ~,,,,~ (~1,n~cr R bent M. Pennock ~«,~,~ ~ _ ~ o ~,,,~,~ `, Mcal die A . Fergu on WITNESSES AS TO BO~'Fi• .:PARTIES STATE OF FLORIDA ~ ,,'.~.,,. COUNTY OF PINEJ.~7.;AS '`,. "`` I HEREBY •, ~E~ZT~~~Y That on this day personally appeared before me, an office duly authorized to administer oaths and take ac- knowledgmant&,~_~ROBERT M. PENNOCK, a single man, and MELODIE A. FERGUSON, ,a ~:~irigZe woman, who are personally known to me or wha have produ~~d a, Florida Driver's License as identification, and who executed,.tYr~„~fd~egoing deed, and they acknowledged before me that they ex~qu~e~'`~~the same freely and voluntarily for the purposes thereine~p~e~sed. ... ~. W`~,TNESS my hand and of cial seal at Clearwater, county of Pin~1.I.~ts,'•~and State of Florida is ~_ day of ~vt.q~., ' A. D. 2002. IT Notary is ,. Donald R Hatt '"` ~ turconahtrssior~soc~sa~trr owta~~ty Commission E ices: • November 1~ 4003 ~ ""~~~ s nfRU7RGYFAWWSURN~tCEL'K, This deed has been prepared at the Grantor's request without examination or legal opinion of title. IN: 2004193030 BK: 13562 PG: 2315, 05t 2004 at 09:23 AM, RECORDING I PAGES $6.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $2520.OO~II~LEEN F. DE BEAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BY DEPUTY C CLKDM$5 ~~ Tfl1E PiIOFFSSIONAtS OF ~9p~ _. 1700 McMuten 8000 Rd Unf kZ. ` itti~: CleatwmxFL 33150E Pwd'X!!el 667 Hay Fiptam~e `-~-.. 4a*waty, FL 33767 ... inciddKal torlm ioumro of a till® in+unaa policy:-~ ~ ~` i pde Nwobv: 3.5036-04 PundIDNunibv: OS-29.15-W756-077-0070 ~~. `-. QUIT CLAIM DEED (CORPORATE) 4,` This QUTI' CLAIM DE1/D;~dated 5th Day of May, 2004 by: Kelly Investoo~nit.and Management Corp., a Corporation Existing under the Laws of the State of Florida hereinafter called SS?q GRANTOR, to: Paul KeAey~aad,~racey Kelley, Husband and Wife whose post ofi'tca~ddress is: hereinafter,cal~`the GRANTEE: {Wherever asedfi~ein the terms "GRANTOR" and "GRANTEE" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal natives and assigns of individuals and the successors and assigns of corporations.) VLnC1R~~$2~TI-I: That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations in hand:'p by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit-claim unto GR~t1R~E~ forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which GRANTEE has in and to the following described ~~~t or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida, viz: LO'f 7{BLOCK 77, UNIT 5 MANDALAY, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same together with all and singulaz the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said GRANTOR, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said GRANTEE forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTOR has signed and sealed these presents the date set forth above. Kelly Investment and Management Corp., by Paul Kelley President SIGNED IN THE PRESENCE OF TFIE FOLLOWING WITNESSES: Signs Ptirlt acne: y a Signature: Print Name: Rob Tomko State of Florida County of Pinellas I hereby Certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Psul KeAey, President of Kdty Investment and Management Corp., a Corporation Exisfing under the Laws of the State of Florida, known to me to be the person(s) descn`bed in and who executed We foregoing instrttrrrent, who acknowledged before me that he executed the same, and an oath was not taken. (Check one:) _ Said person{s} islare personalty known to me. ~ Said person(s) provided the following type of identification: WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 5th Day of May, 2004. ~'"' aooae, roa,~ {;~ w ocmem ~*«~w w, sour Notary Sr lure Roberta Tomko PrintlType/Stamp Notary Signature My Commission Expires: roa~.r: oco. cow. ~~ ,~«a a x~, r. pj : 3 I u~` r b< ~ K y ~ . ~ c~ C~ ~ c~t~ - ~ ~_~ - - ~~ ~~ .;l.I~ 2 Q ~' PLANt~Pfi~~ $ DEV~l.C)r~~,~~ PJ7 SVCS F Using the Most Used Trip Generation Rates from the 7th Edition ITE Tria Generation Re Description/ITE Code Units Expected Expected PM Peak PM In PM Out Units Daily Trips Trips -Total Truck Terminal 030 Acres General Li ht Industrial 110 TSF Gross "" Mini Warehouse 151 TSF Gross Sin le Famil Homes 210 DU A artments 220 DU 8.0 54 5 3 2 ,,,,,~ Mobile Home Park 240 DU -w:ar Assisted Livin 254 DU ,~ ~ ~ All Suites Hotel 311 Rooms ~ ,~.J Motel 320 Rooms °`~' Marina 420 Berths Health/Fitness Club 493 TSF Gross Church 560 TSF Gross Da care Center 565 TSF Gross General Office 710 (Equation) TSF Gross r' ~~~ ~~ Office 710 (Rate) TSF Gross Medical Dental Office 720 TSF Gross Buildin Materials/Lumber 812 TSF Gross Hardware/Paint Store 816 TSF Gross Nursery (Garden Center) 817 TSF Gross Not Available Not Available Shopping Center 820 (Equation) TSF Gross Lunch Hour Traffic Shopping Ce~iter E3~0 lRatel TSF Gross Quality Restaurant 931 TSF Gross Total In Out Hi h TurnoverlSit Down Rest. 932 TSF Gross 0 0 0 Fast Food w/o Drive Thru 933 TSF Gross 0 0 0 Fast Food with Drive Thru 934 TSF Gross 0 0 0 Drive Thru Onl 935 TSF Gross Not Available »»»> No calculations but studies sho Service Station 944 Fuel Position Serv.Station w/ Conven.Mkt 945 Fuel Position Tire Store 848 Service Bas Not Available Su ermarket 850 TSF Gross Convenien. Mkt O en 24 hrs 851 TSF Gross Convenien. Mkt 0 en 16 Hrs 852 TSF Gross Not Available Convenien. Mkt w/ Gas Pum s 853 TSF Gross Discount Club 861 TSF Gross Pharmac /Dru store w/ Drive-thru 881 TSF Gross urniture Store 890 TSF Gross alk-In Bank 911 TSF Gross Drive-In Bank 912 Drive-In Lanes !f ~~ CV :r, l 1 v ~7 ~ ~;.~ 4~ w'Lunch Peak 146-364 two way trips i 54 I:\PENNOCK\Documents\[tripcalc_16111 existing.xls]Calculations 29-Jul-O5 Calculations Using the Most Used Trip Generation Rates from the 7th Edition ITE Trip Generation Description/ITE Code Units Expected Expected PM Peak PM In PM Out Units Dail Trips Trips - Total Truck Terminal 030 Acres General Li ht Industrial 110 TSF Gross ~_...~ Mini Warehouse 151 TSF Gross .~~ Sin le Famil Homes 210 DU 12.0 115 12 8 ~ 4 -~° A artments 220 DU Mobile Home Park 240 DU Assisted Livin 254 DU "~ All Suites Hotel 311 Rooms Motel 320 Rooms Marina 420 Berths Health/Fitness Club 493 TSF Gross Church 560 TSF Gross Da care Center 565 TSF Gross General Office 710 (Equation) TSF Gross General Office 710 (Rate) TSF Gross Medical Dental Office 720 TSF Gross Buildin Materials/Lumber 812 TSF Gross Hardware/Paint Store 816 TSF Gross Nursery (Garden Center) 817 TSF Gross Not Available Not Available Shoppin Center 820 (Equation) TSF Gross Lunch Hour Traffic Shopping Center 820 (Rate) TSF Gross Quality Restaurant 931 TSF Gross Total In Out Hi h Turnover/Sit Down Rest. 932 TSF Gross 0 0 0 Fast Food w/o Drive Thru 933 TSF Gross 0 0 0 Fast Food with Drive Thru 934 TSF Gross 0 0 0 Drive Thru Onl 935 TSF Gross Not Available »»»> No calculations but studies sho Service Station 944 Fuel Position Serv.Station w/ Conven.Mkt 945 Fuel Position Tire Store 848 Service Bas Not Available Su ermarket 850 TSF Gross Convenien. Mkt O en 24 hrs 851 TSF Gross Convenien. Mkt O n 16 Hrs 852 TSF Gross Not Available Convenien. Mkt w/ Gas Pum s 853 TSF Gross Discount Club 861 TSF Gross Pharmac /Dru store w/ Drive-thru 881 TSF Gross Furniture Store 890 TSF Gross Walk-In Bank 911 TSF Gross Drive-In Bank 912 Drive-In Lanes r: r! `"" ~~~ r.. O :.:_; . 3 r, J°~ -,~ may ~/~ . ~i ,+ o~ a' w'Lunch Peak 146-364 two way trips 115 12 I:\PENNOCK\Documents\[tripcalc_16111 proposed.xls]Calculations 29-Jul-O5 • •~ NAPENTHE CONDOMINIUMS STORMWATER NARRATIVE July 29, 2005 The project is located adjacent to Clearwater Bay (Gulf of Mexico), a Florida Outstanding Water. Therefore, the stormwater system is designed to treat 3/4" over the project area prior to discharge. The stormwater pond is designed to be a normally dry grassed treatment pond with a bottom elevation of 3.5 ft. After treatment of the runoff, the stormwater volume will discharge through a concrete weir into the Bay. Runoff from the building will be directed to the pond via roof drains. The stormwater treatment calculation are shown on the grading and drainage plan. ORiGINi91. ~ ~~~~~~~~~r ~, ~u~ z ~ ~ r ~~' ~4,WF~,SVC ~7 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ~; PERMIT APPLICATION 1 ~ ~'~ SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER y ~:~~ MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 2379 BROAD STREET • BROOKSVILLE, FL 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (800) 423-1476 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ACOE Application # DEPNVMD Application # Date Received Date Received Proposed Project Latitude o Fee Received $ Proposed Projed Longitude o Fee Receipt # SECTION A PART 1: Are any of the activities described in this application proposed to occur in, on, or overwetlands or other surface waters? ^ yes ~ no Is this application being filed by or on behalf of an entity eligible for a fee reduction?oyes rd no PART 2: ~~~~~~ A. Type of Environmental Resource Permit Requested (check at least one) ^ Noticed General -indude information requested in Section B. ^ Standard General (single family dwelling)-indude information requested in Sections C and D. ^ Standard General (all other projects) -include information requested in Sections C and E. Cy Standard General (minor systems) -indude information requested in Sections C and H. ^ Standard General (borrow pits) -include information requested in Sections C and I. ^ Individual (single family dwelling) -indude information requested in Sections C and D. ^ Individual (att other projects) -include information requested in Sections C and E. ^ Individual (borow pits) -indude information requested in Sections C and I. ^ Conceptual -indude information requested in Sections C and E. ^ Mtigafion Bank (construction) -indude information requested in Section C and F. (Ifthe proposed mitigation bank involves the censtnxxion of a surface water management system requiring another permit listed above, deck the appropriate box and submit the infom-ation requested by the appligble section.) ^ Mitigation Bank (conceptual) -indude information requested in Section C and F. B. Type of activity for which you are applying (check at least one) C~ Construction or operation of a new system, inducting dredging or filling in, on or over wetlands and other surface waters. (If reapplying for an expired, denied or withdrawn pemtiU application, please provide previous permit # .) ^ Aperation or operation of an existing system which was not previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. ^ Modification of a system previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. Provide previous permit # and check applicable modification type. ^ AfteraGon of a system ^ Extension of permit duration ^ Abandonment of a system ^ Construction of additional phases of a system ^ Removal of a system C. Are you requesting authorization to use State Owned Submerged Lands. ^ yes dno If yes, include the information requested in Section G. D. For activities in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters, check type of federal dredge and fill permit requested: ^ Individual ^ Programmatic General ^ General ^ Nationwide C~Not Applicable E. Are you daiming to qualify for an exemption? oyes q/no If yes, provide rule number if known FORM 547.27/ERP(8-94)A Click here to reset "For Agency Use Only." Page 1 of 5 Y L_ p ~ ~~ L~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~';~ ~~ .;~lE 2 a 1Q0~ l ~ 1~ PtANPd~FJ~; ~,~ YCi.t,:r-":~1:'~)J1/fvr~ ~'RIGIN;+I ~ PART 3: A. OWNER(S) OF LAND B. APPLICANT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER) NAME NAME Paul Kel#ey COMPANY AND TITLF, COMPANY AND TITLE ADDRESS ADDRESS 665 Bay Esplanade CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP Clearwater, Florida 33767 TELEPHONE (727) 441-1475 TELEPHONE ( ) FAX ( ) FAX ( ) C. AGENTAUTHORIZEDTOSECUREPERMIT(IF D. CONSULTANT (IFD[FFERENTFROM AN AGENT IS USED) AGENT) NAME NAME Keith Zayac, P.E., R.L.R. COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE Keith Zayae & Associates, Inc, President ADDRESS ADDRESS 701 Enterprise Road, E., Suite 404 CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 TELEPHONE ( ) TELEPHONE (727) 793-9883 FAX ( ) FAX (727 } 7g3_gg5 PART 4: PROJECT INFORMATION A. Name of project, including phase if applicable: Napenthe B. Is this application for part of a multi-phase project? • • yes • no C. Total applicant-owned area contiguous to the project: 0.52 acres D. Total project area for which a permit is sought:0.52 acres E. Total impervious area for which a permit is sought: 0.37 acres F. Total area (metric equivalent for federally funded projects) of work in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters: 0.00 acres or square feet ( hectares or square meters) G. Total number of new boat slips proposed: 0 ~ ORIGWA. ~ PART 5: PROJECT LOCATION (use additional sheets, if needed) County(ies) P4ne~Ias Section(s) Township Section(s) Township Land Grant name, if applicable Tax Parcel Identification Number 05-26-15-54756-077-0070 & 0060 Street address, road, or other location 667 & 665 day Esplanade City, Zip Code, if applicable PART 6: DESCRIBE 1N GENERAL TERMS THE PROPOSED PROJECT, SYSTEM, OR ACTIVITY. Demolition of existing multifamily units and constructian of 12 condominium units with a dry treatment grassed pond. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94~1 Page 3 of 5 Range Range ' '~ ..r-u~l qY -' ~, r"-U~ 2~ t~i$ ~~ PLANNii~~ & DE~'~ _~,_;r r, ; !1 ~~,~Cv ry.,.. ClTY CIF '.:.::.'~~:',^: "!~ ~ ORiGINhi.~ PART 7: A. If there have been any pre-application meetings for the proposed project, with regulatory staff, please list the date(s), location(s), and names of key staff and project representatives. Date(s) Location(s) Names B. Please identify by number any MSSWMIRM (dredge & fill)/ERP/ACOE permits or applications pending, issued or denied and any related enforcement actions at the proposed project site. Agency Date Number/ Type Action Taken C. Note: The following information is required for suomer ea ianas. riease proviae ine names, aggresses ana zi coxes of prope owners ose property erectly adtoins the pro~ect (excluding applicant and/or is locate within a 500 foot radius of the project boundary (~or proprietary authorizations, if any). Please provide a drawing identifying each owner and adjoining property lines. (Use additional sheets, if needed). 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94~ Page 4 of 5 .., ., .;UE 2 ~ 1005 CANNING "'~""'~~ ~~~~~ r-;. , ~~~ SvC~I ~ ~~~ '~ ~ ~~~ ~ ,u~ z s PART 8: ? PL.AtVl~il3t,; & C1EV~2~''~'~> ~ Pd7SVG'S A. By signing this application form, I am applying, or I am applying on behalf of the owner or applicant, for the permit and/or proprietary authorizations identified above, according to the supporting data and other incidental information filed with this application. I am familiar with the information contained in this application, aril represent that such information is true complete and accurate. I understand tfiat knowingly making any false statement or representation in the application is a violation of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. 1 understand this is an application and not a permit and work prior to approval is a violation. 1 understand that this application and any permit or proprietary authorization issued pursuant thereto, does not relieve me of any obligation for obtaining any other required federal, state, water management district or Iota( permit prior to commencement of construction I agree, or I agree on behalf of the owner or applicant, to operate and maintain the permitted system unless the permitting agency authorizes transfer of the permit to a responsible operation entity. Paul Kelley TypedlPrinted Name of Owner, Applicant or Agent Corporate Title, if applicable Signature of Owner, Applicant or Date B. AN AGENT MAY S[GN ABOVE ONLY IF THE FOLLOWING IS COMPLETED: I hereby designate and authorize the agent listed above to act on my behalf, or on behalf of my corporation, as the agent in the processing of this application for the permit and/or proprietary authorization indicated above; and to fumish, on request, supplemental information in suppoR of the application. In addition, I authorize the above-listed agent to bind me, or my corporation, to perform any reyuirement which may be necessary to procure the permit or authorization indicated above. Typed/Printed Name of Owner or Applicant Corporate Title, if applicable Signature of Owner or Applicant C. PERSON AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: I either own the property described in this application or 1 have legs! authority to allow aces to the property, and I consent, after receiving prior notification, to any site visit on the property by agents or personnel from the Department of Environmantal Protection, the Southwest Florida Water Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers necessary for the review and inspection of the proposed project specified in this application I authorize these agents or personnel to enter the property as many times as may be necessary to make such review and inspection. Further, I agree to provide entry to the project site for such agents or personnel to monitor authorized work if a permit is granted. Paul Kelley TypedlPrinted Name Corporate Title, if applicable Signature Date D. i certify that the engineering features of this surface water management system have been designed by me or under my responsible chazge and in my professional opinion conform with sound engineering principles and all applicable rules and spceifications. I further agree that 1 or my engineering firm will fumish the applicant/ permittee with a set of guidelines and schedules for maintenance and operation of the surface water management system. By: Signature of Engineer of Record !AFFIX SEAL! Date: Phone: (727) 793-9888 Keith E. Zayac, P.E. 48192 Name (please type) FL P.E. No. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc Company Name 701 Enterprise Road, E, Suite 404 Company Address Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 City, State, Zip FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 5 of 5 °`°~ ~ a~ ~~ ~ ~ POST OFFICE 1J0~ 4748' CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 i~.~UNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDI~tG, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 ~Ll(~iNIi±G L?F,PART~4ENT April 17, 2007 Mr. Robert Pennock 665 Bay Esplanade, #3 Clearwater, Florida 33767 Re: FLD2005-07078 - 665-667 Bay Esplanade Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Pennock: At its meeting of April 17, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 665-667 Bay Esplanade shall be submitted by April 18, 2008. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via email at robert.tefft(rc>.,myclear«•ater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentiC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslBay Esplanade 665-667 Nepenthe (T) -CDB Extension Approved 04-17- 071Bay Esplanade 665-667 -Time Extension Development Order 04-17-07.doc J.h.;~1it~?SON, CiJUCaCi[.i~dEMBER i.Hf2LEiV f9. L ETrr2SFN, COUNCiLtwiEMFER i~?;Un 1~ ? r - C"L"ION Ffv[PI,O"z'ER~~ • MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005-07078 - 665-667 Bay Esplanade DATE: April 17, 2007 Attached is information related to the request by Robert Pennock, on behalf of Melodie A. Ferguson Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, Robert M. Pennock Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, and Paul and Tracy Kelley, for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 665-667 Bay Esplanade. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on April 18, 2008. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted asix-month extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by the Board that in the period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been amended such that the following that affect this project: ^ The allowable parapet height for buildings with flat roofs has been amended to a maximum of 42-inches. The project approved by the CDB included a parapet height of five feet-ten inches ^ The definition of "Height, building or structure" has been amended so that only elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures are permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height within the district, which as per the revisions to the "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design special area plan is now 65 feet. As approved, the project included appurtenances (stair towers and architectural embellishments) not consistent with the above definition that projected approximately 10 feet and 16 feet above the roof deck, which has a height of 65 feet. Attachments: Letter of Reguest, Time Extension Development Order (October 16, 2006), Maps and Photos S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)iPending cases) Up for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 665-667 Nepenthe (7) -Extension Request 04-17-07(RT)iBay Esplanade 665-667 -Time Extension Memorandum 04-17-07.doc n 2-15-07 Planning Department City of Clearwater Attn. Robert G. Tefl~ 100 South Myrtle Ave Clearwater, Florida 33756 Dear Community Development Board members, • O ~~~~ U ~_ FEB 15 2007 DEVELOPMENT SERVICEa DEPT CITY nF CLEARWkmrR This is to request a one year extension by the City of Clearwater, Community Development Board of our development order FLD2005-07078-665 Bay Esplanade. This request is based on the following issues and circumstances: The death of our Architect, Mr. John Marshall Scott. His death, after several months, was followed up by the closing of his office. He was a well known Architect but also pretty much a one man office. Out of respect and commitment to Mr. Scott and his family we did not shop for another Architect until after the closing of Mr. Scott's business by his family. It than took us another few months to interview and find another Architect willing and able to take on Mr. Scott's unfinished project. Most architects at that time did not want to take on another architect's work even with the great reputation Mr. Scott had. The condominium real estate market has slowed down considerably. Our project and others are caught in a wait, hope and see situation. We are proceeding, but with caution. To date we have not secured the required pre-sales to be able to move into the building phase of the project. We are requesting this one year extension of our development order to continue our efforts to bring a quality development to North Clearwater Beach. Thank you for your time in this matter. Sincerely, Robert Pennock 665 Bay Esplanade #3 Clearwater, FL 33767 727-441-1475 /_ ITS LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT PosT Or-EECE; Box 4748, CLF:°,RWA"fER, FLORIDA 33755-4748 Mt)NIGEPAI, SF,RVICI:S BUILDWG, 10~ SOUTH MYRTLI: E~VI?NUF., CI,EARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEE.E~EioNE: (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4£365 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEiVIiE,OPMENT REVIt;W October 16, 2006 Mr. Robert Pennock 665 Bay Esplanade, #3 Clearwater, Florida 33767 Re: FLD2005-07078 - 665-667 Bay Esplanade Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Pennock: On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above referenced Flexible Development application to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to height from 35 feet to 65 feet (to roof deck), with an additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the northwest (front) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the north (side) setback from 10 feet to 9.21 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the south (rear) and east (rear) setbacks from 20 feet to zero feet (to deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07025) of two dwelling units from 120 Brightwater Drive under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit must be initiated within one year from the date of CDB approval (October 18, 2006). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On August 10, 2006, you submitted a request for none-year time extension to initiate a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited problems concerning the passing of your architect, and with construction pre-sales and financing. Since the approval of this project, amendments have been made to the Community Development Code that have a significant effect on the project. Those amendments are as follows: o The allowable parapet height for buildings with flat roofs has been amended to a maximum of 42-inches. The project approved by the CDB included a parapet height of five feet-ten inches (5'-10"); o The definition of "Height, building or structure" has been amended so that only elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures are permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height within the district, which as per the revisions to the "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design Piz,~n~h 1 intis:~ri~. ~ti~tn~~ni )~~un 1)~~ii:v'~, t:~ ~cnai.~~u~atiii~a: I k»~r f L~>ni:r~~~. C~>rn~~~u ~~n.~usr l3ni. J~~:~u~.~, C~x~n~aLnirw;r;z Cv:Le~ A. Prrersi~:~, Cur~cu_~n_~u+itr, "E~n~ni. 1?Mi>LO~~,~Ei[~u~r n~i~ Arrir:~in~nvi~: Acru~~ !?;~mlo~r~:' October 16, 2006 ~ • 665-667 Bay Esplanade -Time Extension Development Order Page 2 of 2 special area plan is now 65 feet. As approved, the project included appurtenances (stair towers and architectural embellishments) not consistent with the above definition that projected approximately 10 feet and 16 feet above the roof deck, which has a height of 65 feet. In considering the above changes to the Code, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, (APPROVE asix-month time extension of the original Development Order to April 18, 2007, to initiate an application for a building permit to construct those improvements on your parcel of land at 665-667 Bay Esplanade as previously approved by the Community Development Board with same conditions of approval attached. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such an extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via email at robert.tefft cr,myclearwater.com. Sincerely, ~~ ~~ Michael elk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D SIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicationslBay Esplanade 665-667 Nepenthe (T) - ApprovedlBay Esplanade 665 - Time Extension Development Order 10-16-06.doc 8-9-06 Planning Department City of Clearwater Attn. Robert G. Ted 100 South Myrtle Ave Clearwater, Florida 33756 Dear Mr. Tefft, As per our phone conversation this letter is to request a one yeaz extension of our development order FLD2005-07078-665 Bay Esplanade. This request is based on several issues that have put us in arrears regarding the obt<uning of our building permit. They are as follows. The death of our Architect Mr. John Marshall Scott, his death after several months was followed up by the closing of his office. He was a well known Architect but also a one man office. His family tried to get another Architect to fill his shoes and keep the business running, but were unsuccessful and finally had to close down. We out of respect for his family did not shop for another Architect until after the closing of Mr. Scott's business by his family. It than took us a couple of months to interview and find another Architect willing and able to take on Mr. Scott's unfinished project. Another issue that has delayed our project is the aspect of the fractional real estate concept that we have been exploring with your office and others. We have also been given an opportunity and so faz unsuccessful to find somebody willing to purchase the La Risa property across the street from us and contiguous to us and partner with us to bring a hoteUresort type project to Clearwater. We know the city would like this to happen but so far it has just been a waste of our time. Now with all of the above that has transpired, and diverted us from our original goal, the real estate market we are told has gone flat/away/in the trash can so to speak. What this will certainly do is lengthen the time it will take to pre-sell enough units to satisfy a bank to get construction financing. Regarding some confusion I have in understanding when the building permit needed to be applied for September 20, 2006 versus October 18, 200b, could you please explain what date is the correct one? Further, logically would not the yeaz to get a permit start on November 1, 2005, that being the time when the appeal period was up? Thank you for your time in this matter. Sincerely, ~~~ Robert Pennock 665 Bay Esplanade #3 Clearwater, FL 33767 727-441-1475 ~~vnnav~~ ~o,~u~ 1N3YV121bd3a JNINMdId 9002 ~ ~ JI id ®~~~~~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAI. SERVICES BUILDING, IOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 19, 2005 Mr. Keith E. Zayac ?O1 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Re: FLD2005-07078 - 665 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to height from 35 feet to 65 feet (to roof deck), with an additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the northwest (front) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the north (side) setback from 10 feet to 9.21 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the south (rear) and east (rear) setbacks from 20 feet to zero feet (to deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07025) of two dwelling units from 120 Brightwater Drive under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following finding of fact and conclusions of law and conditions. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 0.52-acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District; 3. That the City's occupational license records indicate the subject property currently being developed with a total of eight attached dwellings; 4. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with the subject property; 5. That the proposed building height is 65 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck; 6. That the subject property is permitted a maximum of 15 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac); 7. That the applicants have previously entered into density transfer agreements with another entity removing a total of five permitted dwelling units (two from 665 Bay Esplanade and three from 667 Bay Esplanade) from the subject property; thereby reducing the available density of the subject property to 10 attached dwelling units; 8. That the development proposal is consistent with the Transfer of Development Rights standards and criteria as set forth in Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403, respectively; 9. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Development standards as set forth in Section 2-803; BRfAN ). RUNGS'(', itiSA1'OR ~'f2AhK f-IiT3a:~Fn, v~Ce M~~~ox HoYr 13.~.~ncroN, Coh~al~Ie~Ili~rz Bn.~. )o~SOn~, CoU>ecu_~nraiHr_rz ~ C:1RL(:N A. Pe~rersr_n~, Couva~a~e~srtrH "F,QuRt. F„~ti>I_oYn~EVT nND AFFIRnTA1~IVE Ac'rloN En1i>~o~~Efz" 10. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria as set forth in Section 2-803.C; and 11. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria as set forth in Section 3- 913.A. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. That any/all required Parks and Recreation fees are paid prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. That any/all required Transportation Impact Fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of--way to the proposed building} be placed underground. That conduit for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of--way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 5. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 7. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 8. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 9. That aright-of--way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of--way; 10. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by September 20, 2006) of Community Development Board approval; and 11. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building pernut shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by October 18, 2006}. Ali required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 1, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via a-mail at robert.tefft(a)myclearwater.com. Sincerely, ~` Mi ael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning Department) C D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslBay Esplanade 665 -Nepenthe (7~ ApprovedlBay Esplanade 665 - Development Order.doc t 428-05 Permits Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning September 7, 2005 Mr. Robert Tefft City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S Myrtle St. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-07078 -665 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Tefft: 701 Enterprise Raad E., Ste 404 Satety Narbar, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phane (727) 793-9855 Fax keith keithzayac.com End please find 15 sets of information addressing cbmmer~ received from City staff including the following items: General Engineering: 1. Two water taps are not needed. Recommended one 6" x 6"tap then branch to F.H.A. and water meter. The water tap has been revised th a single 6"x6" tap. 2. Fire Department Connection (FDC) needs to be located at least 1 t from front fence of building and Fire hydrant assembly maximum 40-feet from FDC. The location of the FDC has been revised to 15 ft from the face of the building. ~.- ~ ~~ 3. Remove Sheet 2 and resubmit with building pem~it application. ~_~. ~» ~ r~ ~: ~, ~ _ ~ i p ',i The note sheet has been removed. - _ ~ ~a ,' C Frre• w ~ ._. 1. Building required to have Fire Sprinkler system. PR/OR TO CDB. A note has been added to the architectural plans requiring fire sprinklers. ~- v~~-r 2. Building required to have automatic Class 1 wet standpipe system wifih a Fire Pump. 100 psi at roof required. Fire pump to be located above BFE. PR/OR TO .~~, ~ #ff CDB. r~.. _~.~-~ 1 428-05 Permits A note has been added to the architectural plans regarding standpipe and fire pump. 3. Building required to have an emergency generator for backup power for Fire Pump and elevators. PRIOR TO CDB. A note has been added to the architectural plans regarding the generator. 4. FDC is required to be a minimum of 75' from building and within 40' of a fire hydrant. PRIOR TO CDB. The FDC has been relocated as required. 5. The fire hydrant for protection systems is in addition to the fir hydrant for fire fighting. There must be a 1 within 300' of building. PR/OR TO CDB. There is one existing hydrant and one proposed hydrant shown on ~e plans per discussions with Steve Strong. 6. Clearances of 7 % feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the fire hydranf are required to be maintained as per NFPA-7. Please acknowt~~ intenf to comply PRIOR TO CDB. A note has been added to the civil plans addressing clearance requirements. 7. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for info-mation signage and be maintained with a c%arance of 7 % feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PR/OR TO CDB. A note has been added to the civil plans addressing FDC signage and clearance. Stormwafier: Before Building Permit a.) Please demonstrate that roof, parking lot and reminder of site flow through treatment pond before discharge. A note has been added to the grading and drainage plans regarding the ~~ roof drains, and an inlet has been added in the driveway to drain runoff ~a to the proposed ponds. ~~ .. v C7 428-05 Permits Solid Waste: 7. Staging area not large enough. The staging area has been expanded to 10' x 10' and relocated adjacent to the sidewalk and right of way line. Traffic Engineering: Vertical height clearance for parking garage must comply with minimum dimensions as indicated in the current Florida Building Code of 8' 2" to accommodate H/G van parking entrance, route, parking space and exit. The garage vertical height clearance is 8'-4". 2. Provide do not enter sin where appropriate. Do note enter signs have been added to the garage exit Planning: 7. The response to General Applicability criterion #1 does not actress how the development proposal is in ham~ony with the scale, bulk, coverage, c~nsity and character of the adjacent properties. Provide a revised response. The response has been revised. 2. The response to General Applicability criterion #6 does not address how the ~velopment proposal minimizes adverse visual effects. Provide a revised response. The response has been revised. 3. The response to Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 does not address the necessary reductions to the side (north) and front (west) setbacks. Further, the response acklresses the economic viability of the project when economic practicalities are not part of the criterion. Provide a revised response. The n~sponse has been revised 4. Are the ingress/egress points into the garage gated? If so, clearly depic~dentify the gating. The gate locations have been added and labeled. ~~~ 3 428-05 Permits 5. The two car garages abutting the ingress/egress points do not meet the minimum dimensions to accommodate two vehicles. The two car garages have been revised and dimensioned to provide parking for two cars. 6. Identify how recycling will be accommodated. Recycling will be collected and moved out to the dumpster and recycling staging area for pickup. The trash chute is detailed in section 4-4 and 5-5 on sheet A-11.1. 7. The dumpster staging area has not setback; therefore the proposed setbacks (under General Notes) should be revised. The setback to the dumpster staging pavement has been revised in the notes and requests. 8. Two site plans have been submitted. Clarify whether the site plan on Sheet 4 of 7 or the site plan on Sheet A2 is the site plan intended for review as they are not consistent with one another. The architectural plan has been removed from the set 9. Revise the elevations to depict the height of the architectural embellishments as measured from the flat roof deck. Elevations have been revised to show height 10. The landscape plan identifies six Alexander Palms for use around the signage; however only five are actually depicted. The plan has been con,ected to show five palms. 11. Clarify the location of the mechanical equipment. The mechanical equipment will be located and screened on the roof. 12. How is the delivery of mail proposed to be accommodated? The mail room has been labeled in tine building lobby. 13. A motion on the site plan indicates that an application Comprehensive Sign Program is not available for residential development. 4 ,, . k 428-05 Permits The note has been revised to "Proposed signage will comply with City code". 74. Revise the wa/kways connecting to the public sidewalk to eliminate the excess pavement. The walkways should not need to exceed five feet in width. The walkways have been revised as discussed at DRC. 75. Clarify the status of the existing cocks. How is access proposed to be accommodated? The stormwater ponds have been revised to provide access to future docks. Note that the docks ar+e not part of this submittal. 16. Eliminate the access to the bedrr~oms from the lobby. The access has been eliminated. S' ly, -~- Keith E. yac, P.E., R.L.A. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 1:30 pm Case Number: FLD2005-0 -- 665 BAY ESPLANADE Owner(s): Paul Kelley 665 Bay Esplanade Clearwater, FI 33767 TELEPHONE: 727-441-1475, FAX: No Fax, F.:-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Safety Harbor, F134695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.eom Location: The 0.52-acre parcel is located on the south side of Bay Esplanade,approximateiy 600 feet of Poinsettia Avenue. Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with an increase to height from 35 feet to 69 feet (as measured from the base flood elevation to roof deck), an increase in the height of the parapet wall from 30 inches to 48 inches, a reduction to the north (side) setback from 10 feet to 9.21 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the south and east (rear) setbacks from 20 feet to 0 feet (to deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03019) of two dwelling units from 120 Brightwater Drive (sender site) to 665 and 667 Bay Esplanade (receiver site) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33'761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy~aol.com Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Two water taps are not needed. Recommend one 6"x 6" tap then branch to F.H.A. and water meter. 2. Fire Department Connection (FDC) needs to be located at least 15-feet from front face of building and Fire hydrant assembly maximum 40-feet from FDC. 3. Remove Sheet 2 and resubmit with building permit application. Ali of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Prior to CO: 1. Condo plat to be recorded with Pinellas County. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 34 1 . By order of ChieT6t~Construction, NO APPROVALS on Bay Esp~de untiil water supply is improved.PRIOR TO PERMIT All questions regarding this fire comment should be addressed to Chief of Construction S. C. Strong who can be reached at 727-562-4327 ext 3039. 2 , Building required to have Fire Sprinkler system. PRIOR TO CDB 3 . Building required to have automatic Class 1 wet standpipe system with a Fire Pump. 100 psi at roof required. Fire pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB 4 . Building required to have an emergency generator for back up power for Fire Pump and elevators. PRIOR TO CDB 5 , FDC is required to be a minimum of 15' from building and within 40' of a fire hydrant. PRIOR TO CDB (. The fire hydrant for the protection systems is in addition to a fire hydrant for fire fighting. there must be 1 within 300' of building. PRIOR TO CDB '7 , ***PLF.ASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RECEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIB[LITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. g . Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure adequate water supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Calculations due PRIOR TO PERMIT. 9 , Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 10 . Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 i/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Issues. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 , No issues -new 12 unit condo replacing an existing 13 unit condo Stormwater: 1 . Before Building Permit 1) Please demonstrate that roof, parking lot and remainder of site flow through treatment pond before discharge. 2) Dry ponds are required to draw down in 24 hours or less, please revise design. Solid Waste: 1 . Staging area not large enough. Recomend 10x10. Needs to be closer to curb cut. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 35 Vertical heigh~earance for parking garage must comply withimum dimensions as indicated in the current Florida Building Code of 8' 2" to accommodate H/C van parking: entrance, route, parking space and exit. 2. Provide do not enter sign where appropriate. A11 of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Planning: 1 . The response to General Applicability criterion #I does not address how the development proposal is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties. Provide a revised response. 2 . The response to General Applicability criterion #6 does not address how the development proposal minimizes adverse visual effects. Provide a revised response. 3 . The response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #1 does not address the necessary reductions to the side (north) and front (west) setbacks. Further, the response addresses the economic viability of the project when economic practicalities are not part of the criterion. Provide a revised response. 4 . Are the ingresslegress points into the garage gated? If so, clearly depict/identify the gating. 5 . The two car garages abutting the ingress/egress points do not meet the minimum dimensions to accommodate two vehicles. 6 . Identify how recycling will be accommodated. 7 . The dumpster staging area has not setback; therefore the proposed setbacks (under General Notes} should be revised. 8 . Two site plans have been submitted. Clarify whether the site plan on sheet 4 of ~ or the site plan on sheet A2 is the site plan intended for review as they are not consistent with one another. 9 . Revise the elevations to depict the height of the architectural embellishments as measured from the flat roof deck. 10 . The landscape plan identifies six Alexander Palms for use around the signage; however only five are actually depicted. 11 . Clarify the location of the mechanical equipment. 12 . How is the delivary of mail proposed to be accommodated? 13 . A notation on the site plan indicates that an application Comprehensive Sign approval will be submitted at a later date. Please note that the Comprehensive Sign Program is not available for residential development. 14 . Revise the walkways connecting to the public sidewalk to eliminate the excess pavement. The walkways should not need to exceed five feet in width. 15 . Clarify the status of the existing docks. How is access proposed to be accommodated? 16 . Eliminate the access to the bedrooms from the lobby. Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 36 ,~~'S~plaf ryf~.. ~' i V;,.~ I ~,~ o ~~~ - Qi ~~ ~ _ _. ~Q~~i ATER, ~~ ~~~'~~ i i ! t l LONG RANGE. PI.tLtiNING DEVELOPMENT RL:VIEW August 9, 2005 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., ALA 70l Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT GG POST OFFICE BUX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 337~8-47`f8 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOU"I'H MYRTLE AVF.NL'E, CLF~IRWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELF,PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (72~ 562-4576 Re: FLD2005-07078 - 665 Bay Esplande -Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Zayac: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD200S-07078. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on September 1, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft(a~myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ~--, ~, ~~ ~ ~~~~ Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 I3KL~S f. Ai~~~rsr, ~9-a~~oti F~;n~h k Iitsisn~a>, Vies ;~L~~~~>~i ti~w~r 11-~>>u r~n~, C:~x~~cn ~tr:~~isT_Ez I3ui ~~~~c~~~, Cui~~~r.n.~u>tISCK ® <:.~hu~s:1. Pr.irhse~, C~x~~~a~~~~:>!~sest ,.I:<<x~n1. F.a]hL.oS~a][:.Vr :tin ArruzatA~I~I~~r; Acru» E,~Ii~l<» ~r.]i" L~ r r ~'~°+. ~~-~~ ~~~o~ ry ~~ ~. ~~~ ~ .~= `~1' ~~4 ~'S~ - ,, Q°~~ -+~~,,.4TE~,'C,~~ fffXflf LONG RANGE. PI.~NNING Dl:vt:LOEtitrNT RevtE:w August 5, 2005 Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Assoc., Inc. 701 Enterprise Rd East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE. BOX 474H, CI,EAKWATF,R, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIRAI. SERVICES BUILDING, ISO SOU"LH MYR'CLE AVLNUE, CI,I:ARWATIR, FLORIDA 33756 "lE[.ERIIONE (727) 562-4567 Fnx (727) 562-4576 Re: FLD2005-07078 - 665 Bay Esplanade -Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Zayac: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2005-07078. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomulete with the following comments: ;~ Pursuant to Section G of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, depict all required setbacks on the site plan; ~' Pursuant to Section H of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, the names of abutting streets shall be identified on the landscape plan; Pursuant to Section I of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, the building elevation drawings are to identify the materials proposed. The submitted elevations lack details as to the materials proposed aside from a decorative mansard roof and 42" aluminum railings; ~: `The Description of Requests (Attachment "A") does not include a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 9.21 feet (to pavement); 5:~ The Exhibit "B" associated with the Density Agreement is incomplete (blank); ~ The Exhibit "C" to the Transfer of Development Rights application seems to end in mid-sentence. Please submit a complete Exhibit "C"; ~~' The Transfer of Density Rights application does not indicate the height increase being requested; and B: In association with the Transfer of Development Rights application, the survey submitted for 120 Brightwater Drive/Bella Aqua Villas (sender site) is outdated as the property has subsequently been replatted. Provide a copy of the recorded plat for this property. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Noon, Tuesday, August 9, 2005. I3itiaN ~..~~~~cr, At~~~0a Fi.:~sh I lits[;-v:n, Vu:r.:~in~~xt 1Ic» ~r [I:1>ui.r~~N, C<x,~~cn~u.~usr:f: Ian i. J<,~tioc, C<x~~.~cu_>>i~nsrat ® C,v:u.N A. Pe i Lrse~', C~~i ~ru ~u_~usrr. "f?~~I~:v.Eali~[.<»~ali~:~~Tatii~.ln~u<»~~rivi~:AcnOti~ 1:,1u~[<» ~[~_fz„ n Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft(cr~myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 cc: E.D. Armstrong, III, Esquire L J August 5, 2005 CITY OF CLEARWATER ,~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: Keith E. Zayac, (727) 793-9855 E.D. Armstrong, (727) 462-0365 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2005-07078 J 665 Bay Esplanade Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at; robert.te,(frc~i,rnycleanvater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearrvater.com ** Aug. 85 2005 03:51PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94620365 Aug. 05 03:49PM 01'17 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS ' 1"EN<J' ##04. TI-EN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASuISTANCE, PLEASE CAt_L i-800-PEEP--FAX C435-7329). i ~ Aug. 05 2005 03:43PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 Aug. 05 03:41PM 01'37 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS ' h'EHL1' #I04. TF~1 SECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR ' -' . FOR FAX ADtJANTA[~ ASSISTAhICE, PiL-ASE GALL. 1-800-F~iP-FAX C435-7329). Pale 1 of 1 a~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~a~e ~ o~~ ~' ~a~o 05-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFR Pinellas Caunty Praperty Appraiser 11:09:08 Ownership Infarmation Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales FERGUSON, MELODIE A OBK: 12022 OPG: 2286 PENNOCK, ROBERT M FERGUSON, MELODIE A THE REM PENNOCK, ROBERT M II THE REM 665 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767-1598 EVRC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Rddr: 665 BAY ESPLANADE of Jan 1, 2004, based an Census Tract: 260.02 3 sales from 2002 - 200 : 747,400 Sale Oate OR 8ooklPage Price {puallUnq} YaclImp Plat Information 9 !1,996 9,458f1,002 340,000 4Q} I 1929: Soak 020 Pgs 048- 7 11,990 7,3266,258 200,000 4Q} I 0000: 8aak Pgs - 1011,986 6,340/ 555 260,000 (Q} I 0000: Soak Pgs - 0 10 Of 0 0 { } 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS JustlMarket: 605,100 Homestead: YES Ownership X 1.000 SAVE-OUR-HOMES CAP Govt Exem: NO Use x: .250 RssessedlCap: 551,000 Institutional Exem; NO Tax Exempt X; .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 526,000 Agricultural; 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: YES Frontage: CanalfRiver Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x ^epth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 12,081.90 1} 88 x 115 11, 000. 00 8$. 00 F Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 t.Jithaut the Save-Our-Names 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 sap, 2004 taxes will be ; 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 13, 324.55 ~} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be ; 13, 898. 78 Share legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPEAT BLK 77, L OT 6 AS DESC. IN Description PL 20 PG 27 L http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gif?p=05-+-29+15+54756+077+0060&0=1 8/5/2005 o~ ~ ~~ ~ a 15 / Page 1 of 1 ~~~~~ ~ a7~ ~ ao~o :a~ 05-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:09:08 Residential Card 01 of i Prop Uee, 220 Land Uae; DO Living Units; 4 Imp Type. Duplex~Triplex Prop Address; 565 BAY ESPLANADE Structural Elemsnts Foundation Continuous Wall Floor Byetem Slab on Grade Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco/Reclad Roof Frame Flat-Shed Roof Cover B U Tar&GravelfOthr # Stories 2.0 Floor Finish Crpt/Unyl/SftWdlTerr Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster Quality Above Average Year Built 1,967 Effective Age 25 Heating Central Duct Cooling Cooling {Central} Fixtures 20 Other Depreciation 0 Functional Depreciation 0 Econonomic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2, 108 7) . 00 0 2} Base Semi Finished .80 224 8) .00 0 3) Upper Stry Base Area . 90 2, 188 9} . 00 0 4} Utility .35 96 1D} .00 0 5) Screen Porch .25 440 11) .00 0 6} Open Porch .20 759 1,Z} .00 0 Reszdcntial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Unites Value RCD Year 1) DOCK 17X39 20.00 663 13,260 5,300 1,974 2} ASPHALT 7x250 .00 1,750 0 0 1,974 3) PATIO/DECK X-TRA 8.50 200 1,700 680 1,974 4} P001. 416 SF 15, 000. 00 1 15, 000 6, 000 i, 974 5) . 00 0 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 11,980 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-gift ?p=05+29+15+5475b+077+0060+01 &0=1 &t=1 8/5/2005 Pale 1 of 1 05 / 2~ / 1~i ~ 5~75~ ~ 07? ~ 070 05-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:09:41 Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales KELLEY, PAUL OBE: 13562 OPG: 2315 KELLEY, TRACEY 667 BAY ESPLANDE CLEARWATER FL 33767-1550 EVAC; A EUAC Comparable salsa value a~ Prop Addr; 667 BAY ESPLANADE of Jan 1, 2004, bayed on Census Tract; 260.02 2003 l f 2002 : ga es rom - 730,600 Sale Date OR 8ooklPage Price {QuallUnq} VaclImp Plat Information 5 /2,004 13,56212,315 360,000 {U) I 1929: Soak 020 Pgs 048- i !1,995 8,88811,890 400,000 4Q} I 0000: Soak Pga - 9 11,994 8,79511,683 111,000 {U} I 0000: Baak Pga - 9 11,994 8,792/ 595 437,800 {U} I 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Ju9tJMarket: 617,500 Homestead: NO Ownership ~ .000 Gaut Exem: NO Use x: .000 AssessedlCap; 617,500 Institutional Exem; NO Tax Exempt X; .000 Historic Exem; 0 Taxable: 617,500 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage; Bay Clearwater View: Water 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Unite Meth 04 Taxes; 14,183.60 1} $$ x 115 11, 000. 00 88. 00 F Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Saae-Our-Homes q} 0 x 0 .00 .00 sap, 2004 taxes will be : 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 14, 183. 60 ~} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be : 14, 183. 60 Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT H0. 5 REPEAT BLK 77, LOT 7 AS DESC. IN Description PL 20 PG 27 L http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gif?p=05+29+15+54756+077+0070&0=1 8/5/2005 i 05 / 29 / 15 l 54756 / . Page 1 of 1 077 J OC~~~ :01 05-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:09:41 Residential Card 01 of 3 Prop Uee: 220 Land Uee: 08 Living Units: i Imp Type: Single Family Prap Addreee: 667 BAY ESPLANADE S-truc~ural E1~m~n~ts Foundation Continuous tJall Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall ConcDk StuccolReclad Roof Frame Flat-Shed Roof Cover B U Tar&G ravel/Othr # Stories 2.0 Floor Finish Crpt/HdTl/HdMar)Prgt Interior Finish Drywa111Plaster Quality Average Year Built 1,952 Effective Age 20 Heating Central Duct Cooling Coaling {Central} Fixtures 12 Other Oepreciation 0 Functional Depreciation p Econonomic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Rrea 1} Base Area i. 00 i, 312 7) . 00 0 2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 602 8) .00 0 3) Utility .25 1,475 9) .00 0 4) Open Porch .20 330 10) .00 0 53 .00 0 11) .00 0 Fi) .00 0 12) .00 0 R~sid~n-Cia1 Extra Fc;a-tures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) PATIO/DECK 368SF 8.50 368 3,130 1,250 1,970 2) CONC PAVE 6X200 3.00 1,200 3,600 3,600 999 3} DOCK 452SF 20. 00 452 9, 0+10 7, 770 i, 970 a> . ov o 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 12,620 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gift?p=05+29+15+54756+077+0070+01 &0=1 &t=1 8/5/2005 05 / 29 / 15 / Pagel of 1 ~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~7~ :~~ 05-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:09:44 Residential Card 02 of 3 Prop Use; ZZO Land Use; 08 Living Units; i Imp Type; Single Family Prop Rddreaa; 0 S-Cructural E 1E:msn-C s Foundation Continuous Wall Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco/Reeled Roaf Frame Gable-Hip Roof Cover Composite Shingle # Stories 1.0 Floor Finish CrptfHdTl/HdMar/Prgt Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster Quality Aye rage Year Built 1,950 Effective Rge 25 Heating Central Duct Cooling Cooling {Central) Fixtures 6 Other Depreciation 0 Functional ^epreciation 0 Econonomic Depreciation 0 5111 Aromas Description Factor Rrea Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 i,iZO 7) .00 0 2} Open Parch .30 196 g} .00 0 g} .00 0 9} .00 0 4) .00 0 10} .00 0 5) .00 0 11} .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Residen-Cia~ Ex-tr~ Features Description Dimensions Price Unite Value RCD Year 1} .00 0 0 0 0 2} .00 0 0 0 0 3} .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5} . DO 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TDTRL RECORD VALUE; 0 http://pao.co.pinelias. fl.us/htbin/cgi-gift ?p=05+29+15+54756+077+0070+02&0=1 &t=1 8/5/2005 05 / 29 / 15 / 54756 / Page 1 of 1 ~~~ ~ oo~o :~~ 05-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFR Pinella9 County Property Appraiser 11:09:42 Residential Card 03 of 3 Prop Uae: 220 Land Use: 08 diving Units: 2 Imp Type: Duplex/Triplex Prop Rddresa: 0 S~ructur~tl E lemcen~ s Foundation Continuous tJall Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco/Reclad Roof Frame Gable-Hip Roaf Caver Composite Shingle # Dtoriea 1.0 Flaor Finish Crpt/HdTl/HdMar/Prgt Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster Quality Average Year Built 1,951 Effective Rge 25 Heating Central Duct Cooling Cooling (Central) Fixtures 6 Other Depreciation 0 Functional ^epreciation 0 Econonomic ^epreciation 0 Sub Areas ^escriptian Factor Rres Description Factor Ares 1) Base Area i. 00 i, 702 7) . 00 0 2} .00 0 8} .00 0 g} .00 4 `~} .00 0 .q} .00 0 10} .00 0 5} .00 0 11} .00 0 6} .00 0 12) .00 0 R~siden-Cia1 Ex-Cra Fea-Curss Description Dimeneiane Price Units 'Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4} .00 0 0 0 0 5} .00 0 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TDTR~ RECORD VALUE: 0 http:/1pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbin/cgi-gift ?p=05+29+15+54756+077+0070+03&0=1 &t=1 8/5/2005 CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2005 Case Numbers: FLD2005-07078• and TDR2005-07025 Agenda Item: E.4. Property Owners: Melodie A. Ferguson Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, Robert M. Pennock Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, and Paul and Tracy Kelley Applicants: Robert M. Pennock and Paul Kelley Agent: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Address: 665 and 667 Bay Esplanade CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to height from 35 feet to 65 feet (to roof deck} with: ^ An additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the northwest (front) setback from I S feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the north (side) setback from 10 feet to 9.21. feet (to pavement), a reduction to the south (rear) and east {rear) setbacks from 20 feet to zero feet (to deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and ^ Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07025) of two dwelling units from 120 Brightwater Drive under the provisions of Sections 4- 1402 and 4-1403. EXISTING ZONING / Tourist (T) District LAND USE: Resort Facility High (RFH) Category PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached dwellings (8 units) Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (12 units) ADJACENT ZONING 1 North: Tourist (T) District -Overnight Accommodations LAND USE: South: Preservation (P) District -Clearwater Harbor East: Preservation (P) District -Clearwater Harbor West: Tourist (T) District -Attached dwellings CHARACTER OF THE The surrounding area is a mixture of attached dwellings and oven~ight IMMEDIATE VICINITY: accommodation uses. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.52-acre subject property is comprised of two lots and located on the south side of Bay Esplanade, approximately 400 feet south of Somerset Street. The subject property is zoned Tourist (T) District with an underlying Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) category of Resort Facilities High (RFH). The property is also located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District. According to the City's occupational license records, 665 and 667 Bay Esplanade are each developed with four attached dwellings (8 dwellings total). The property located at 665 Bay Esplanade consists of a Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07078; and TDR2005-07025 -Page 1 two-story building with an accessory swimming pool between the building and the right-of--way as well as a large asphalt parking area that "backs out" into the right-of--way. The property located at 667 Bay Esplanade consists of a two-story building and two single-story buildings with the majority of the property consisting of paved surface and parking backing out into the right-of--way. It is noted that at its meeting of April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved a development proposal at 665 Bay Esplanade for five attached dwellings within a building 59 feet in height (to roof deck) and having reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building), 3.5 feet (to swimming pool), and zero feet (to pool deck). Development Proposal: The development proposed consists of the construction of a 65-foot high building (as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck) containing a total of 12 attached dwellings. Each habitable level within the building will contain two three-bedroom dwelling units with each unit being 4,227 square feet in size. The existing back out parking within the Bay Esplanade right-of--way will be removed and replaced with sod and afive-foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the property line. It is noted that no sidewalk presently exists adjacent to the subject property. The development proposal also includes the provision of a swimming pool /spa with deck at what is effectively the southeast corner of the site. Parking and a solid waste staging area will be located on the ground floor. Hecht: Pursuant to Section 2-803, the Tourist (T) District allows a standard maximum height of 35 feet that may be increased to a maximum height of l00 feet, based upon meeting certain criteria. However, as the subject property is located within the "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design special area plan, height is further limited by the standards set forth in the Pian as being low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code. Analysis with regard to the proposed building height is made later in this staff report as part of the Beach by Design analysis. Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2-803, attached dwellings are required to provide a front setback of 0-15 feet, a side setback of 0-10 feet, and a rear setback of 10-20 feet. The proposed building has been designed to either meet or exceed these setback requirements; however deviations have been requested to allow for the encroachment of the refuse-staging area into the northwest (front) setback to zero feet, the encroachment of a walkway into the north (side) setback to 9.21 feet, and the encroachment of the swimming pool deck into the rear (south and east) setbacks to zero feet. The walkway associated with the reduction to the side (north) setback is necessary to provide adequate egress from the stairwell, and the refuse staging area is necessary to for solid waste pick-up. As such, the requested reductions associated with these areas are supportable and similar reductions have been approved in the past. With regard to the requested reductions to the rear (south and east) setbacks to accommodate the proposed swimming pool /deck, it is noted that the pool/deck area accounts for approximately 40 percent of the rear yard. Based upon this approximate rear yard coverage, the atypical lot configuration and the buildings setback, which is generally in excess of 20 feet, the reduced rear (south and east) setbacks can be supported. Density: As previously noted, the subject property is located within the RFH FLUP category, which permits a maximum density of 30 attached dwelling units per acre. Thus, the 0.52-acre subject property is permitted a maximum of 15 attached dwelling units. However, prior to the submittal of this application, the applicants had entered into density transfer agreements with another entity for a total of five of the permitted dwelling units (two from 665 Bay Esplanade and three from 667 Bay Esplanade). Therefore, based upon the above, only 10 attached dwelling units remain available on the collective subject property. Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07078; and TDR2005-07025 -Page 2 The development proposal is for 12 attached dwelling units. As such, the applicants have submitted an application for Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) of two dwelling units to the subject property from 120 Brightwater Drive. An analysis of this application is discussed below. Transfer of Development Ri is (TDRZ Pursuant to Section 4-1402, parcels governed by a special area plan, such as Beach by Design, may only receive density transfers from parcels within the same special area plan and may not exceed the otherwise applicable maximum density by more than 20 percent. Based upon the above, the subject property can receive a Transfer of Development Rights for a maximum of three dwelling units. The Transfer of Development Rights application submitted proposes the transfer of two dwelling units from 120 Brightwater Drive, which is located within the Beach by Design special area plan, the same as the subject property. The maximum number of permitted attached dwelling units for the 120 Brightwater Drive property (the "sender" site) is 10 dwelling units. It is noted that the site has recently been developed with six attached dwellings and therefore has four dwelling units available for transfer. Accordingly, the proposed Transfer of Development Rights is consistent with the requirements of Section 4-1402 as noted above. Further, it is noted that the transfer of two dwelling units onto the site will result in the provision of only 12 attached dwelling units on site, three fewer than the property would have been permitted by right if the property owners had not previously transferred development rights away from the property. Transfer of Development Rights Criteria (Section 4-1403): The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the Transfer of Development Rights criteria as per Section 4-1403. Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the X fair market value of abutting properties; 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; X 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land X uses; 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the X immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for X development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-803, attached dwellings units require the provision of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Therefore, the proposed 12 attached dwelling units require a total of 18 parking spaces and the development proposal includes the provision of 22 ground level parking spaces. Based upon the above, compliance with the requirements of Section 2-803 as they pertain to off=street parking has been achieved. Solid Waste: The development proposal includes the provision of a refuse holding area or "trash room" at the center of the building. 1n addition, a 10-foot by 10-foot concrete slab will be provided to the north side of the entrance for use as a refuse staging area. Recycling bins will be provided on the ground level within the refuse holding area. Sitna~e: The applicant is not proposing any signage with this development proposal. Any future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Utilities: A11 on-site utility facilities (i.e. electric and telecommunication lines) are required to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. Provisions for the future undergrounding of Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07078; and TDR2005-07025 -Page 3 existing aboveground utility facilities in the public right-of--way must be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in a manner acceptable to the utility companies and the City. Beach by Design: In 1997 and 1998, a Plan was prepared for the City entitled "Clearwater Beach: Strategies .for Revitalization. " This Plan was prepared after an extensive public process, directive surveys and input from the City Council and City administration. The purpose of Beach by Design, which was adopted by the City Council in 2001, is to implement the recommendations of that Plan and regulate development within certain areas of the beach. The subject property is located within the "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design special area redevelopment plan and is defined as "an area of transition between resort uses in Central Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia (Street). " In order to implement this vision, Beach by Design states that building heights should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code. While "mid-rise" is not specifically defined within the Community Development Code, based upon the height standards set forth in the Medium Density Residential (MDR), Tourist (T), and High Density Residential (HDR) Districts, the Planning Department has previously interpreted "mid-rise" development as having a maximum height of 50 feet. Accordingly, the proposed height of the building (65 feet to roof deck) would be inconsistent with the above definition of mid-rise development. Revisions to "Old Florida": At its meeting of September 1, 2005, the City Council discussed a new policy direction with regard to the "01d Florida" District. This policy direction calls for limiting the height of buildings on those properties north of Somerset Street to 35 feet; limiting the height of buildings on the first 60 feet south of Somerset Street to 50 feet; and limiting the height of buildings in the balance of the District to 65 feet. In addition, the Council gave direction for increased site design performance by the way of larger setbacks and/or building step backs. As previously stated under the "Setbacks" analysis, the proposed building either meets or exceeds all required setbacks. With regard to the front of the building, the structure has been designed with a "V" shaped recess that steps back approximately 50 feet from each side (north and west) of the building. The building has also been designed with numerous angles, beveled edges, and recessed balconies that will give the building the appearance of having additional step backs. Based upon the above, the development proposal and the proposed height of 65 (to roof deck) would seem compatible with the new policy direction set forth by the City Council. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA (Sections 2-801 and 2-803): The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the standards and criteria as per to Sections 2-801 and 2-803: Standard Density 30 dwelling units per acre (15 dwelling units) Impervious 0.95 Surface Ratio Lot Area 5,000 - 10,000 sq. ft. Lot Width 50 - 100 feet Height 35 feet Parking Spaces 1.5 spaces per unit (18 spaces) Proposed 12 dwelling units 0.69 22,896 square feet (0.52 acres) 100 feet 65 feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) 22 spaces (1.83 spaces per unit) Consistent Inconsistent X X X X X* X Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07078; and TDR2005-07025 -Page 4 i ~ Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent Front Setback 0 - 15 feet Northwest: 20.29 feet (to building) X* 0 feet (to pavement) Side Setback 0 - 10 feet North: 11.62 feet (to building) X* 9.21 feet (to pavement) West: 16.55 feet (to building) X 16.96 (to pavement) Rear 10 - 20 feet South: 20 feet (to building) X* 0 feet (to pavement) East: 20 feet (to building) X* 0 feet (to avement) * See discussions under Analysis. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria {Section 2-803.C): The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria pursuant to Section 2-803.C: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and X development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting X properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise pernutted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive I~11 Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5, The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel X proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the X immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate X vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street X parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist (T) District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07078; and TDR2005-07025 -Page 5 General Applicability Standards (Section 3-913.A}: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the General Applicability Standards pursuant to Section 3-913.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use X of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to height from 35 feet to 65 feet (to roof deck}, with an additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the northwest (front) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the north (side) setback from 10 feet to 9.21 feet (to pavement}, a reduction to the south (rear) and east (rear) setbacks from 20 feet to zero feet (to deck}, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07025) of two dwelling units from 120 Brightwater Drive under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403, based upon the following recommended findings of fact and recommended conclusions of law and conditions of approval: Recommended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 0.52-acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District; 3. That the City's occupational license records indicate the subject property currently being developed with a total of eight attached dwellings; 4, That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with the subject property; 5. That the proposed building height is 65 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck; 6. That the subject property is permitted a maximum of 15 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac); 7. That the applicants have previously entered into density transfer agreements with another entity removing a total of five permitted dwelling units (two from 665 Bay Esplanade and three from 667 Bay Esplanade) from the subject property; thereby reducing the available density of the subject property to 10 attached dwelling units; 8. That the development proposal is consistent with the Transfer of Development Rights standards and criteria as set forth in Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403, respectively; 9. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Development standards as set forth in Section 2-803; 10. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria as set forth in Section 2-803.C; and 11. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria as set forth in Section 3-913.A; Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07078; and TDR2005-07025 -Page 6 ~ ~ Recommended Conditions of Approval: I . That any/all required Parks and Recreation fees are paid prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. That any/all required Transportation Impact Fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of--way to the proposed building) be placed underground. That conduit for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of--way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 5. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 7. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. A11 signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 8. That aright-of--way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of--way; 9. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by September 20, 2006) of Community Development Board approval; 10. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit; and 11. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. ... ~~9~ Prepared by: Planning Department Staff ~J j''_~"~ ~ Robert G. Tefft, Planner IIl ATTACHMENTS: Photographs of Site and Vicinity Location Map Aerial Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFL.F.X (Fl,D)IPending cases) Up.for the next CDBIBay Esplanade <65 -Nepenthe (T) - 10-18-03 - R718ay Esplanade 665 -Staff Report 10-18-OS.dvc Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07078; and TDR2045-07025 -Page 7 w~~Q~ 8T a ~ a a o d~ ago ~ ~~ C 4Ei ~ E N IA a ' ' ('(S'T~'t ~jjpp J'( 'l, l '~~ LJ ~1 ~~ VERBENA y a a AAP h14~ ~~ D P ~ Q a ~rd ~~ o~ PROJECT SITE „~~,~ .~ 0 ~~A 0 ~LENAID ~,E Pp' cxEr+oAtF .d~R ,LL H~ "~ fEO a 94Y 3 AVALQ7 ~ m (KEN-b11L1 Au*b z p ~Np BAY ESPIPNACE rorxpnnv ~! P~ ~AMiar 8AYA4DM ST ~'F CW ~~ w 'z o < f o ~ °~N ppiN~ ~ p PPPAYA ST PPSSA~'E ~ < $ O~Y KZ4 w < d ~ ~ +~°`~ O c~~.Y ~ WWONARD P S q F location Map Melodie A. Ferguson Revocable Living Trust Owners: :Agreement DTD, Robert M. Pennock II .Case: Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, and FLD2005-07078 !; Paul and Trac Kelle Site: bb5 and 667 Bay Esplanade Size Ac es): 0.52 PIN: 05/29/15/54756107710060 05/29115/54756/07710070 Atlas Page: 258A S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\up ror me nexr c.uts\tsay Csp,onaae oo~ -,ve~en,rlc (T) - i0- l8-OS - RT\Maps\Location Map.doc • A erial M ap Melodie A. Ferguson Revocable Living Trust Owners: Agreement DTD, Robert M. Pennock II Case: FLD2005-07078 Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, and Paul and Tracy Kelley I Site: 665 and 667 Bay Esplanade Property 10.52 I Size (Acres) PIN: 105/29/15/54756/077/0060 05/29/15/54756/077/0070 Atlas Page: ~ 258A S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD~\F'ending cases\up ror me nexr c,uts\tsay rspionaoe oo~ - rve/~enme (TJ - 10-18-OS - RT\Maps\Aerial Map.doc • • SOMERSET ST W j 69 j I_-j I I ~_.~_~ j I ~I I m I------ r' 66`at ~ ------ -----_- [St _ - I I ------ ~--~2 168517 ~--~ i I ~{ ~ I ~I ~ - I -_=_ - ==~2 -- --- D i - ---r-t_.. -- ~ =_ I Z ~._rs_ I_ ~ I ~ I I 1 I I _ --' --- --I ---- __ r- ~ ~r4 --- - , i aS~Z, _ i \ t7~ I I ~ I -- -~ ~-871?~.•,~ _ ~ I - ~ °° I ~ I j -- ~ r I I I _ J I ----- r-~I ---- - j I 64_4 --i - I _r-r 6~j1 I If I __ I I `..--I I ~ 84~ I ~ 04~ \ ~ ~ ~--i ~., ~~~ r \ I \ ~~ r~i \ -1 __ _ - 1 7 I I J j t X640 ~ i ~ \ I - - 839 /~(,/i `_/ -; -, WATER AL WAY J Y RO //~~ i' ~ ~!J ~ ^ T~18~ ` \`~ ! ~~ W~ -i -- 832 ~, > i I 1 , -I 613 ~ / / \ % I II ~I 1 1~ +1 I / I 1 1 1 f _~ ~ 1 II ~ °°I 11 i I Il P n~ I~ ~~^~ 82x" / 1 ' 1 ~/ c i 1 Q ~ 8 ; ; , ~ 181 ~' ----- Q ~~,_,,•_i_,t ~_ i s1a I- `su,, I ,,., W 1~; D W i n - ~ ~~ ~~' ro~ Q RRr/~.7 Z 1 ~~ 1~ 6 ~ ~ ___-- i ~ _~e m 6,i ~__--, t ~-' 6 , -- i ``- I ~ ~ I Q t t C r- i ^~-- ~ 1 -i ~ ~; 1 ~ - j ~ 677 -~--- ~ I' D ' L-- -ao~'- r ~ ~ ' ' aa°I m ; --t`.r ~ . J D 605 ~, ea1--- _ ~e4 D ' ` _ ---1 ~~ I--'I r~~i_ m 9 ~ ~ i - m I 1 ~ 1 1 JUAN/TA WAY , - ~ q-- i -r-5eo I I , _ Future Land Use Map Melodie A. Ferguson Revocable Living Trust Owners: Agreement DTD, Robert M. Pennock II Case: FLD2005-07078 Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, and Paul and Trac Kelle Site: 665 and 667 Bay Esplanade Property Size (Acres) 0.52 05/29/15/54756/077/0060 PIN: 05/29/15/54756/077/0070 Atlas Page: 258A S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLU/\f'enaing cases\up ror me nexr c..un~tsay tsplanaae oo~ - IvC~cr1111C (TJ - 10-18-OS - RT\Maps\Future Land Use Map.doc • • ~ ~ _688__, 688 i 889---- i - i iv~ ~ '•------~ 1 I~---~ I --- '~ I 1 __-___~ I I '~ I~ r ~ ______ _ 8041 --- _ _ m - _ I I' ___ ~__~Z ~B~if '--L i 1 r ~ I ~I i ~ \ - ~ ~ ! _ -- -- ~ =__= i -==>~z - ---r-~_~-- i =~ D Z ' I --- ~ I j 1 881 1 881 i b ~ r`~r~r i ~~~ 657 J ~ _-~ ~ m\ -----` _ ~ ~ I ; I ; I I --- - r------1 - I~ i 65~. _ -- ~ r= ~ 65a - ~ i I i 1 I -- -i BR3~„~ I ~ -- --~ ., r_r~ I f'889 ~ __ I ~i ~ I-- L _ _ r __~er ~ °° I ~ -- r I~ r -- I 1 I - 1 -- _ ~-----~ ----- r - I I 8441 ~ I I 1 -r-r r )I I i 84~ ~ ---- ~ I I :.--I ~ l 1 I I ~-- I I I ~ -~` ~ 1 84~ ~ I ~ 84>; \ awl I ~--7 ~,~ ~^\ ` - ~' - I ; ``fp ; ' .._ _ _ , r ; -- s - -= , \ ~ ~ J ~ I I ~ X640 j ~ r-' 83& i - ~ ~ L----- - . T Roy ~, ~ -- ., r-1_ _ . ~ 8 I 4 fiR~ 1 I - -- I 2 h ) ~l I I _ i ' i ~ ~ ~ ~ I II I I i1 i B~$j ~~% ~ N li i ~j li r ~~~~ ~ II ~ ~~ t~ ~ i~~ IBZrI ~---, W --- I ~. ~= ' i Bz~ ~ 8121 s?1,~,_ I 11 i 1 1 1~ ~ i n Lr -_~ 1 61~ ~ ~ 1 - r 1 I io II ~ r~ ~ i "~ i '~ ski `---' O~/1~ rI BOFr 8 i~ ~ ~~-I t 60S' RI r_~ 61 I I 1 1 I ~ \ L_ I 1 r -~- D 6pT 1 ~ 3 ~ ~ _ _t ~ coq R1 ~ -\ r i D li I 605 f 4 1 ~' b^ _ ---, '--~ ~ -~ ~ _, m ~9 _' _ ~~ , - - ~ I I 1 sr-- ~ -- --5eo Zoning Map Melodie A. Ferguson Revocable Living Trust Owners: Agreement DTD, Robert M. Pennock II .Case: FLD2005-07078 Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, and Paul and Trac Kelle Site: 665 and 667 Bay Esplanade Property 0.52 Size(Acres~: 05/29/15/54756/077/0060 PIN: 05/29/15/54756/077/0070 Atlas Page: 258A S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLDJ\Pending cases\Up for the next CUts\tsay tspianaae ao~ - Nepenme (TJ - 10-18-05 - RT\Maps\Zoning Map.doc • • - SOMERSET ST //~~/J 868 ~ 669----i ~ --1~ ~ ~-----~ j I~v~h D ~ ~--- I/ ~I '~ -_ 1 884 I ------' I vutli I,o r~ - -- ------ - -----_- I ' --- 4 hed Ie~i, ,--~ ; ~ r ~ ernight - ; ~ ~ I } ' I ~ -- _ ~ __ ngs - ----- -~-t_~ -- ___ ; ; -- ~ z ~_,t~o modations --~ _ I I I 881 I 681 I ~ ~ ~ 657 J i -~ 1 i ~ -----~ A ched , m ___ r ~ I I 1 _I , ~------i -- I 185_, -• ; ~ __ 65,41 --- - ~ I I it ^r I ~ ~--~ I I _ ` ~ ~ ~~ I J~ -~~~_~~ -_ ___•850 t_~ __ 855 'BBY - ~ ~ I f J ~ ~ l- -----~ I ----- ~ 8441 aC ~ ~ t I I -rf l L~'Y 1 I ~ '~. ~ Oue igTyt--' ~J ~-- ? I I I , ~~- -~ "~ , --- ~ ~ - r t °° I ~ , . `~ , ' t- 01 e ~ it ~ I - --- ~ I ~ I / - -' `_/ 63g -- r-~ A ' m ations I ~ I _ / u ~----- J ROYAL WAY 631 t ~ I 838 '~ -t~t'fa ~~ ~"; ~, ` i AI[, II 1 I I it I 61$ ~ ~+/ / _~ \ ^' % -t~ h l II r d ~ ~ ~ rJ ~ ca ~~.~ Taw i g °; ~( e ~ 1622-I t 1 - ,, _ / ,, ; ~ ; Q 82 Q "' 7. 2 ' 61 ~1 Q o ; ~ 1 ~ ~I61 -= 1 8?l,-~ f- ~ a c~ .. - , ` 61d av rnight 7°' W ~ ~---- --DG ' ea~'rr odations Park ~ ; ~eo~, _~ ~ ~-~ _ ~ ~ eoa, m ~-- ~; a ~- n ~ I ' X05 ' ~ m D '. ' 641_-- - ~S 1 -- ~4 m 9 ~ ~ ~ -~-~ --I r i ~ __ el ' ~'' ~ ( ' w ; JUANITA WAY 1 I ~~'--, __ `560 I I I Existing Surrounding Uses Map Melodie A. Ferguson Revocable Living Trust Owners: Agreement DTD, Robert M. Pennock II Case: FLD2005-07078 Revocable Living Trust Agreement DTD, and Paul and Trac Kelle Site: 665 and 667 Bay Esplanade Property i A 0.52 ze( cres): S 05/29/15/54756/077/0060 PIN: 05/29/15/54756/077/0070 Atlas Page: 258A S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Bay Esplanade 66J - Nepenthe (T) - 10-18-OS - RT'\Maps\Existing Uses Map.doc ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~T:Y-r~'~ r~ ~:. `a ~~. ~- ~., :~ -_ Looking north from subject property across Bay Esplanade. 665 - 667 Bay Esplanade FI,D2005-07078 Looking east along Bay Esplanade at subject property. Looking southeast from Bay Esplanade at subject property. Looking southwest from Bay Esplanade at adjacent property to the west Looking southeast from Bay Esplanade at subject property. COLOR LEGEND: mxzaos °'°""'~""«"'°'°°' t -BUILDING COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW153 OFF WHITE" ~ %'~+~ 2 -BUILDING BASE COLOR: SCOTT PAINT #8235 ® ® 3 - FASCIANVINDOW TRIM COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OWI54 ----- _ 4 -ROOF MATERIAL: GLAZED TILE -SCOTT PAINT #7785 ® µs« ® ^ f~~a,,, ~ ~ cE~~ 5 -RAILINGS/BALUSTERS: SCOTT PAINT OW154 ® L~! I NOTE: ® 8 ® ~Y ~~ ® FOR COLOR SAMPLES REFER TO EXTERIOR BUILDING O COLOR ATTACHMENT I BFE FROM GRADE. 4'-0" _ _ _ _ E«cr.p„ s AEU=«r~.~~,s - T ~«~~« F«~„ ~ I BUILDING HT. FROM BFE: 65'-0" ~ ~! ® r ~ o! ~ ~ NORTH ELEVATION `' ~s ' SCALE: 718"=1'-0" ,; I ~ ® ,~ --~ ~ ® ;,~ i ; ----- ' ~ ~ T-~ ® - ® J- i - - ,~-_ - I ---- o ,,~~ ~« ~~,~ COLOR LEGEND: T-r_„--- ~ ~ 1 -BUILDING COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW753 OFF WHITE" ~~ it O ~ ° f w a 2 -BUILDING BASE COLOR: SCOTT PAINT #8235 ~~' ~~' s ~ c ® SI ® o i o 3 - FASCIA/WINDOW TRIM COLOR: SCOTT PAINT Ob'VI54 ~'I I~--- _-- ° a w 4 -ROOF MATERIAL: GLAZED TILE -SCOTT PAINT #7785 of ~ ® ® ® ~ ~ `~ ~ 5 - RAILINGS/BALUSTERS: SCOTT PAINT OW154 ~ n N ~ e s -- NOTE: b ~~ «N ® O ® ® i FOR COLOR SAMPLES REFER TO EXTERIOR BUILDING i, O - F~«~~, O `a ~~ COLOR ATTACHMENT mli ° O ® ® ® J °- w i ° BFE FROM GRADE: 4'-0" --- ~ O o BUILDING HT. FROM BFE: 65'-0" i i ® ® m i EAST ELEVATION '~ ° ~ SCALE'. i/B"'=1'-0-0" --- O O A ------- 1 J COLOR LEGEND: 1 -BUILDING COLOR, SCOTT PAINT OW153 OFF WHITE" 2 - BUILDING BASE COLOR. SCOTT PAINT #8235 3 - FASCIA/W WDOW TRIM COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW154 4 -ROOF MATERIAL: GLAZED TILE -SCOTT PAINT #7785 5 -RAILINGS/BALUSTERS: SCOTT PAINT OW154 NOTE. FOR COLOR SAMPLES REFER TO EXTERIOR BUILDING COLOR ATTACHMENT COLOR LEGEND: 1 -BUILDING COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OW153 OFF W RITE" 2 -BUILDING BASE COLOR: SCOTT PAINT #8235 3 - FASCIA/WINDOW TRIM COLOR: SCOTT PAINT OWI54 4 -ROOF MATERIAL: GlAZEO TILE -SCOTT PAINT #7785 5 -RAILINGS/BALUSTERS SCOTT PAINT OWt54 NOTE: FOR COLOR SAMPLES REFER TO EXTERIOR BUILDING COLOR ATTACHMENT BFE FROM GRADE: 4'-0" BUILDING HT. FROM BFE: 65'-0" WEST ELEVATION _ __ SCALE: VB"=1'-0" i 8FE FROM GRADE: 4'-0" BUILDING HT. FROM 8FE: 65'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118"=1'-0" s z o o ~ o z °nw =ui~ a ~ w Z r`$ U z 0 z II 0 m A ', B.o-100S z >dB~ D - ~ e ,.. ... ) , ^ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~~~ D~ _ ~o ~ F ~ ,~ _ ~ _ ~ ,.. ~ A ~ .~ - ;' i T ~ ~~O ~ y ~ ~-; i `- ~ ~~ GR S '.._ _ BEIXtOOM > BEDROOM ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ O V s ~ I% „~~ ~ ; , EVEL 2 PLAN - 4227 S F ~~ ' ,~ 1~ . . __ ~ ~ SCALE: tli6"=1' 0" ' I MEDH a LOBBY ' EOUP. ^,~ ROON <~` / V~` ~ ,-'iT ~i~` ~7~-T _ ~~ PAN ' UV ~~/ TRY ' f 7' d ~ ~ OFFlCE ~. - ~ 4 r1 i Z ~ ~ C i ~ i (~ ~ ~ p y S~ I a~w ... •O DLO '"- _ ~ i ~ . w i ; . ~ ( C a m E%ERCISEI ~ O j 2 ~ U CLO - WIC' NOTES t THE BUILDING IS TO hNVE A FNiE SPRRBttER SYSTEM _. THE BtALpNG IB TO tMVE AN AUTOMAiiD CU561 WET STANDPIPE SYSEM WITHA FBiE PUMP. T1E FIRE ~ ~ J ~ - ~ ~nnsenn~ iMSIER BEDROOM F P. F, PUAM IS LOCATED iN ONE OF THE NECW.NIDAL EOIAPMENT ftOOMB ABOVE THE BFE. J. TI#8t%IDRGMTO HAVE AN EMERGENCY GEtEMTOR ~ r- J ~ .., QQ~ ,~ ' ' Z fOR BAC%LF POWER FOR FIRE PIRN AND EIEVATOR6. (~-'~ ~~ `~'~ 00 00 d ~~ ~ I ~ A. THE FDC AS TO 8E A WIPMtAIOF 15' FROM T!E BMLDING A!~ WITNN t0' Oi FIRE HYDRANT. S THE B1M.01Np IB T08E IN COMPLIANCE WITH 111E YPICA FLOOR PLAN -LEVEL 1 FLORIDA flRE PREVENTNJNOODE MOA. e TI# MAIL IS 10 BE OELNERED TO THE MAIL 80%ES LOCATED IN Tl~ LOBBIES T A~CNANIGLEOIAPMENT ROOMS ARE LOLAlE00N AU LEVELS. ~Po .o. LEVEL 3 8 4 PLAN - 4227 S. F. SC ALE: 118"=7'-0" SCALE: i/16"=t'-0" A 3 ~ ~ rtl 6 _ ~ i._; _ _ a 1 ~~- ~ ~ ' =~ ~ ~~ ~ re.. ~ i::i,, ~ ~ -~ LEVELS 5 & 6 PLAN - 4227 S.F EACH UNIT. SCAIE~ 1116"=1'-0" NDTEs 1 TIE BULpNOIS TO 1NVE A FlRE SPRrcacIER bYSTEM. ] THE BUILDRI6IS TO HAYE MAUipMtiCCUSSI WEi STANDPIPE SYSEY N9THA FlRE PUMP. THE FIRE PUMP IS LOCATED IN ONE OF THE AECHANCAI EOUPMEM ROOM6 ABOVE T11E BFE. J THE BUIDNG IS TO INVE MESERCENCY GENEMTOR TOR BACKUP POWER FOP flRE PU1M' AND ELEVATgib ~ TIE f0C W tO BE A MSNMIAA Of IS FROM TIE 8U11pN0 ANJ'MTNN tl Of FIRE HYDRANT 5. ilE BUKDINO IS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE VAM THE FIORK]A FRE PREVENTION CODE 2Wt. b. TIE MAK. Y T08E DEINERED TO TiE MAIL 80%ES LOCATED W TtE IABBEb. T MECMANICAl E0URNIENT ROOMS MEIOCATED ON ALL IEVEl6 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1!8"=P-O" zzO~ ~ ~+~ > 3 = Q 0 wa7 Q ~~ s _,.,., ~ • NEPENTHE EXTERIOR BUILDING COLORS 1 2 3 5 BUILDING COLOR SCOTT PAINT OW153 'OFF WHITE" BUILDING TRIM COLOR AND BASE COLOR SCOTT PAINT #8235 FASCIA/ WINDOW TRIM SCOTT PAINT OW154 'OFF WHITE" ROOF MATERIAL GLAZED TILE SCOTT PAINT #TT8S RAILING /BALUSTER SCOTT PAINT OW1S4 "OFF WHITE" r V Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ J d" ~~ O er ~~~~ ~/~ "t ~f ~~~, Address ~~~' ~S -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , PhonelEmail 1 would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. 1 have reviewed th etails d believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida Dis ct. I y~oul ke t equest the Community Development Board approve this project on Octo er 180200 . Signature ~CZ 1 r,1~- ~'! t~k-~G.~ ,Printed Name __ ~~'"~ `~ ~~ ,Date Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 6651667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: ~ ~ I ~~- ~~ ~~-~ ,Owner 9~ ~~ ~~Address ~~7 f ~~~ r ~~ , Phone/Email I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed the detail and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida Distri I w ld ike to request the Community Development Board approve this project on Octob~r~l $, ~~p5~ Signature L' _, Printed Name ~ ~ 7 ! ~ ~ ,Date Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: b~ ~ ~'"(~1Q ~ ~ ,Owner _~C~'~ ~~f ~~ ^ ~i ' , ~t~dress ~~~' C~'J~' ~ ~ ~ , Phone/Email I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed the detai s and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida District.~i would dike t~ request the Community Development Board approve this project on Signature Printed Name ~jGl~ ~ ~ ~ p ~"'~ ,Date i Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: Q -~~ , ~ ~ `.~- ,Owner ~,~~ ~ ~SPL~I,r~~Address ~~'~ - ~~ 7 a S `~ , Phone/Email I would l' e to express full su port of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have re wed e d 'ls believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida District wo 1 li to r est the Community Development Board approve this project on Octob 18, 2 0 ,~''~ Signature ,Printed Name ~.,•~ j~ ~ D~ ,Date ! ~ Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665!667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: ~~~ ~'~ Lt ,Owner ~~ ~ ~%SP~ ,Address ~~ "~'" ~7~~`. ~~ ~~ , PhoneBmail I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have revi wed the details and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida District. wou li to requ st the Community Development Board approve this project on October 8, 20 ~ ~,,. Signature ti ~ ~~ZC7~ ,Printed Name t~ c,`T" f 6 ~ ~~ ~ ,Date Subject: Proposed l2 unit condominium project Location: 6651667 Bay Esplanade To: Ci//t~~y of Clearwater ,) From: fT ~ ~ ~ ~ -~~ ~ P~" ,Owner ~i t~ ~- C~ y /~ ~ ~ 1~t%> ,Address ~~ ~'' ~ ~~r ~~ ~ , PhoneBmail I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed details and belie e this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida Distri .Iwo d ike to reque e Community Development Board approve this project on . Octob r 1$, 2 OS ./' ( ,/ ,Signature p~ /~'° /~} L7 ~- ~ ,Printed Name ~% / ~ ~~~ ,Date Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665!667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: ~~a2°~3 1, ! ~- ,Owner G21 1?~4`~ ~~~L~w~,~c; ,Address ~2~` -l-~-4-~ - L~,-~2-~ , PhonelEmail I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed the details and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida District. I would like to request the Community Development Board approve this project on October 18, 2005. --. ''" ~~-~'"'"-" ,Signature C$~4 -L~='s ,Printed Name l~~lS',OS ,Date ~ i Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: ~~'~~ ~. ~ ~ ~- ,Owner (~.Z.1 ~~~ ~ K~1.14 W i4~L ,Address ~2~- -L~~k4 - L~-t-~-Z.t ,Phone/Email I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed the details and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida District. I would like to request the Community Development Board approve this project on October 18, 2005. -.--- =~ 1° __ __..._ ,Signature ~_y~~ C,~Za . ,Printed Name 1 t ~IU S ,Date 0^,~25,~2U 14 ?~~ : 4~ FAX ~ i Kathryn & Thomas Ziola b85-687 Bay Esplande Clearwater Beach, Florida 337b7 13 9 Baysi de Dr Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 727-444-4400 14.12-QS Vie are both familiar with the Nepenthe. The building design is beautiful and complements the surrounding area projects, We are in total favor of this project and would life it to have your total support. ~ ~~~~~ 001IO~i1 i i Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 6b5/667 Bay Esplanade TO: From: Owner Address 7 ~.~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ _, Phone/Email --~ I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed the details and believe this project will be a bene ial ddition to the Old Florida District. I would like to request the C~~~n.uv~y Developfnent Board approve this project on October 18, 2005. Signature ~6Ur() ~ .Printed Name Date • Subject: Proposed I2 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: GV~ O ~ /~ er 6,~ ~/4 ~5 ~~~~ ~~--, Address Z.7 - ~ - , Phone/Emaii I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed the details and believe this project will be a beneficial add' ' o the 01~ Florida District. I would like to request the Communi evelopment oard approve this project on October 18, 2005. -- ... ,Signature Printed Name .. ~~ ~ / ~ " / b S ,Date Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 6651667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater / 4~~ From: il~ ~ L T~~~ ~ Owner ~j y ~ ~/~~/ ~S~L~Ir~ ,Address ~~~'' `7~~' 7~g ~ , PhoneBmaii I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed the details and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida Distr}~t. I xvoul~ like to request the Community Development Board approve this project on Signature ~~`( ~"" M' L ~ ,Printed Name ..~' C3C~l ~ t~ ~ ~/ ,Date Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 66S/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: ~~~ ~ 1~~1~' ~~6~ ,Owner ~i C~7N /~G~~ ,Address ~„~'~A-- ~~~ `"~~ ~~ - , Phone/Email I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed the det ils and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida Distn I ~`~ppul like to request the Community Development Board approve this project on Octo 18,Ia00~. Signature Printed Name C ~ ~ b ~-`~ ~ E7 ,Date ~ i Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: _~~~ /q ~~`fi~/y - LLC,~Owner ~`~ /~ ~~ ~~[~, Address M~~ 7 -' ~~~ "`~ ~~ ~ ~ , Phone/Email ~- Iwould like to xpr ss full su port of the condominium project proposed at the above location. 1 have rev'ewe e tails elieve this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida District I w d i e to r q st e Community Development Board approve this project on Octobe 18, 5. Signature ~ ~~~ ,Printed Name ~~'~ f ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,Date Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater i From: ~~ /Y) ~~ 0(, / ,Owner jo ~ 2- ~1/~L~1~'G /~~ ,Address ~~ ~ -' ~~~ ~- 75~, Phone/1Jmai1 I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed the details and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida District. ~ would like to request the Community Development Board approve this project on October 8, 2 5. ,~ Signature ~~~~' '~~ ,Printed Name r 7 ! ~``Ib ~ ,Date ~ ~ Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 6651667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: ,~~~~/Z mt;12 27 L / ,Owner ~ ~ l~~~~ A~ ~"~~ ,Address 7~ ~~' ~~~ ' ~~~ , Phone/Email Iwo d like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I hav evie detai and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida Dis i t. I ul like t request the Community Development Board approve this project on Oct r 18 2 0 ___ ,Signature ~~~ ,Printed Name Date Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: jt~ ~, ~ V ~~ ~-c j~~~T" ,Owner ~, /® ~~ „ ~,,/~,~~~.~° /~ ~~ ,Address ~.Z ~- ~ 7 6 - ~' ~'._S"a , PhoneBmail I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed the details and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida District. I would like to request the Community Development Board approve this project on October 18, 2005. .~~~ _. ~"` ,Signature ~4.< r ~,~~., ~~ /~-/~~ ,Printed Name I ©~~-~~°- ,Date ~ i Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: ~r ~ [ ~~ ;, ~ ~-' , ,Owner (~ ~ ~ ~~~ [''~ ,Address ~v ! `Z ~~' ~~7 ~ /~ , PhonelEmail I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have r viewed the details and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida Distri . I wind ike to requt the Community Development Board approve this project on Octob r 18 OS Signature N1/IC,, ~~ ,Printed Name ~~ ~ D ~1 ,Date • Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: P t~ (~ ~ ~~ [-J ,Owner t~~ ~ ~'`'~ %~ P Address 7~ 7 °' ~'~~® ,~ ~ ~ , Phone/Email I would like to express full sup ort of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed the det 'ls and lieve this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida District. I~woul~ike o requ t the C.~unity Development Board approve this project on October 1 , 200 . '~,~.,/ I!"'`'' ' ,Signature P~~~-''l1'I~'~, Printed Name ~ C, % / d ~-, .Date ~ ~ Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City roof Clearwa~te,/r From: ~ +~-~ ~n I ~P ,Owner (J~'~ ~ ~ ,Address ~~-~ °' ~J.S~' 7~a ~ , Phone/Email I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed he de ils and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida Dist 'ct. old lik to request the Community Development Board approve this project on Oct er 1 2 5. Signature !~~! (-_'~C,~' .Printed Name 1 (;7C'.~t / ~ () ~ ,Date Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: Pc J ~~-- ~ u ,Owner ~:~~ J9r~~~~t,~-I ~tt~, Address ~,~`~-° ~ ~~ ~ 7~ ~ , Phone/Email L' I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed t e det ils and believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida Distt. I wou lik to request the Community Development Board approve this project on Oct er 1$~ 20 5. Signature ~~~" ~-~~"-~--C ,Printed Name (.tip-1 J ~ ~(~ ~ ,Date Subject: Proposed 12 unit condominium project Location: 665/667 Bay Esplanade To: City of Clearwater From: ~~%~ ~ ~- 1'Y~ il~•~ ~L 2 ,Owner t< () ~~, Address ~,~", °' 7 ~ ~'" ~~~~ , Phone/Email I would like to express full support of the condominium project proposed at the above location. I have reviewed e tails d believe this project will be a beneficial addition to the Old Florida District. wo i' to quest the Community Development Board approve this project on October , 2 5. Signature Printed Name ~-~') / ~ ~ ~ ~ ,Date CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 18, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE• All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINI~TING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (cont'd from 09-20-OS) KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from S ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 & 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7- 10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 2. Alan Rophie, Ralph Rophie, Cecila Betech, & Cheryl Cohen (Rophie Family Partnership) are requesting Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 sq ft building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly St) setback to pavement from 25 ft to 11.39 ft, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Ave) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Blvd) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement}, reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 sq ft of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 sq ft of gross floor area) and to permit a 6-ft high non-opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly St and east along Kilmer Ave), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Ave) landscape buffer from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Bivd) landscape buffer from 15 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Vehicle Service Major) at 2430 Gulf to Bay Blvd, Sec 18-29-16, M&B 13.04. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-07075 3. Liberty Mirabel LLC (Raxit & Punit Shah, and Battle Creek Hospitality Inc) are requesting Flexible Development request to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 47 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 13 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 4.75 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and 10 ft (to pool), and a reduction in the lot width from 150 ft to 142 ft as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Secs 2-404.F and 2-1602.C and H. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 211 & 221 Skiff Pt Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5-A Lots 33 & 34. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Pla~n~r III. FLD2005-04036 4. Clearwater Centre LLC (Guy & Susan Bonneville, Sebastian & Elizabeth Dorner, & Anthony Dorner) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for ht (148 ft to roof deck where a maximum of 75 ft would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit amixed-use (71 attached dwellings and 44,300 sq ft of non-residential floor area), and to increase the building ht an additional 27 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (71 attached dwellings and 44,300 sq ft of non-residential floor area)] at 1100 Cleveland St, Bassadena Blk A, Lots 1-14 incl part of Lot 15, and Bassadena Blk B Lots 9-11, and 14-25. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07067 5. Melodie A Ferguson Melodie A Ferguson Tre Rem, Robert M Pennock, Robert M Pennock II Tre Rem, and Paul & Tracey Kelley are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 65 ft (to roof deck), with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the north (side) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the south (rear) and east (rear) setbacks from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07025) of 2 dwelling units from 120 Brightwater Dr under the provisions of Secs 4-1402 and 4-1403. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 665 & 667 BaV °l~sp~anade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 6 & 7. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planer III. FLD2005-07078 6. Lenny Cristino is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of a restaurant with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 96 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing outdoor seating deck), from 25 ft to 22 ft (to canopy), and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 14.3 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure) and a reduction of parking spaces from 43 spaces to 9 spaces, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.M, and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 9 ft (along S Fort Harrison Ave), and a reduction to the rear (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Restaurant) at 1101 S Fort Harrison Ave, Magnolia Park Blk 39, Lot 1, parts of Lot 2 & Vac Lotus Path Adj on N. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 06053 ~- i 7. Thomas C & Dorothy J Jessup are requesting a Flexible Development approval (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Ave) setback from 25 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 15.5 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew St) setback from 25 ft to 4.2 ft (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Rd) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Ave) from 25 ft to 8.5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 11 ft (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along N Keene Rd) from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Ave) landscape buffer from 10 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew St) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 4.2 ft (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along N Keene Rd) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 9 ft (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Bicycle shop (retail sales and services) with parking] at 1770 Drew St, Woodmere Hts, Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06054 8. Patrick E & Toni V Hickey are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 ft to 63.75 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 16 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Doctor's office) at 107 McMullen Booth Rd, Sec 16-29-16, M&B 21.05. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07077 9. Two to One LLC (T. Edward Entreken, V.P.) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit the re-establishment of retail sales and services (financial institution) as a primary use within the Office (O) District with a reduction to the side (west) setback from 20 ft to 4.7 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.B, and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4.7 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (north) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (financial institution) and office] at 1825 Sunset Point Rd, Pinellas Groves, Parts of Lots 7 & 8. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07079 10. Hamilton Family Trust (Regatta Bay of Clearwater, LLC, Roland Rogers) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 5 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 sq ft to 7,280 sq ft, a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 60 ft, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 9 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 8 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 77 ft (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (S condominiums)] at 862 Bayway Blvd, Bayside Sub No 6, Unit C, Bik D, Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07080 11. Clearwater Retail Group LTD is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings as part of a mixed use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (east along S Missouri Ave) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Rd) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 9.7 ft (to dumpster enclosure) and an increase to building ht from 25 ft to 52.25 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional 15.5 ft for a decorative clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Rd from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (32 condominiums)] at 810 S Missouri Ave, Clearwater Retail, Lot 10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07076 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in ail persons giving testimony in quasi judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. i ~ Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL f72'7) Sb2-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 10/02/05 FLD2005-07078, 109 108 5TH ST LLC 9 SUNSET BAY DR BELLEAIR FL 33756 - ANDRESON, DEAN ANDRESON, ANN 2046 BRENDLA RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - BANNON, MARY KATHLEEN TRUST 8013 WILDWOOD LN DARIEN IL 60561 - 5914 BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC 627 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - BERETA, STANLEY D THE 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 BOYES, JAMES R BOYES, GEORGIA 969 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1013 CIUCEVICH, JOSEPH 736 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ~ e 166363 ONTARIO LTD 152 CLARENDON ST SOUTHAMPTON ON NOH 2L0 00030 - CANADA ARDENT INTERNATIONAL LTD LIABI 2840 EAST BAY DR # 363 LARGO FL 33771 - 2408 BAY ESPLANADE AT CLEARWATER BE 2110 DREW ST # 100 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231 BEACH & GULF SANDS INC 657 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1515 BOERNER, SUSANA B 112 S LAUBER WAY TAMPA FL 33609 - 2615 CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN 55 SOMERSET ST # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 Clearwater Beach Association Jay Keyes 1418 100 Devon Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 COATES I INC 873 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1826 D'ARRIGO, STEPHEN V 11 ARLENE AVE WILMINGTON MA 02476 - 4131 COQUINA APTS INC 692 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1500 DE BELLIS, BARBARA 55 SOMERSET ST # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 LBRECHT YVETTE 16 ASHENDEN WALK FARNHAM COMMON BUCKS SL2 3UF 00009 - UNITED KINGDOM ARMBRUSTER, JOHN 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 BAY ESPLANADE 617 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 BEARDSLEY, JAMES M 15 MAYFAIR LN BUFFALO NY 14201 - 1522 BORUTA, SCOTT V 611 POINSETTIA AVE # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CASWELL LLC 949 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Doug Williams, President 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, FL 33761 CZIPRI, BRENDA K THE 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 DE BENEDITTIS, FRANK DE BENEDITTIS, NANCY 4602 104TH ST CORONA NY 11368 - 2813 DEAN REAL ESTATE INV INC DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC DIGIACOMO, MICHAEL 647 BAY ESPLANADE 90 MILVAN DR DIGIACOMO, LESLIE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 TORONTO ON M91 1Z6 00030 - PO BOX 561 CANADA KIMBERTON PA 19442 - DOM, MARY 65 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1547 EPIC HOLDINGS SOUTH 139 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 • EYLER, CYNTHIA A HOLDEN, DONNA L 554 ADALINE AVE VANDALIA OH 45377 - 1802 EYLER, DONALD C FERGUSON, MELODIE A FITZGERALD, RONALD EYLER, CYNTHIA A PENNOCK, ROBERT M 665 POINSETTIA AVE 554 ADALINE AVE FERGUSON, MELODIE A THE REM CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1530 VANDALIA OH 45377 - 1802 FERGUSON, ROBERT M II THE REM 665 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1598 FIVE PALM CONDO ASSN INC FOLEY, DONALD F FORLINI, DOMENICO G 673 BAY ESPLANADE FOLEY, CATHERINE G 808 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1324 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 FRANKS, VIRGINIA B 669 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503 GEOMAR HOLDINGS INC 115 ARGYLE KIRKLAND QC H9H 3H9 00030 - CANADA GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED PO BOX 152206 IRVING TX 75015 - 2206 HAYS, WILLIAM D HESSELSCHWERDT, BERND J HILDEBRAND, WILLIAM O JR 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 304 HESSELSCHWERDT, BERNHARD 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1536 55 SOMERSET ST # 5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 HOLDEN, ROBERT L 12 STILLWATER HEIGHTS OR WEST BOYLSTON MA 01583 - 1122 JAKSCH, ROBERT W 1596 SHIRLEY PL LARGO FL 33770 - 2218 Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 KELLEY, PAUL KELLEY, TRACEY 667 BAY ESPLANDE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1550 KROMER, JOHN KROMER, JANET 10317 GREEN LINKS DR TAMPA FL 33626 - LETOURNEAU, WILLIAM T HIRSCH, DEBORA A 395 16TH ST NEWPORT MN 55055 - 1061 KEYS, RANDALL A 6713 E WHITEWAY DR TAMPA FL 33617 - 3216 KIELMANN, LOTHAR E KIELMANN, WENDY 35154 LEON ST LIVONIA MI 48150 - 2668 LA RISA DEVELOPMENT CO LLC LENTRICCHIA, DOMENICK 880 MANDALAY AVE # C-908 LENTRICCHIA, KARIN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 814 NARCISSUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334 LEWINSKI, HANNA LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH 661 POINSETTA AVE #306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537 LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH LEWINSKI, HANNA 60 SOMERSET # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1543 LONG, MARIAN C MAVITY, LEON L MC FADDEN, ARLENE S 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 104 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 307 MC FADDEN, ROBERT G CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537 661 POINSETTIA AVE #204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 MC KINNEY, CARMELLA C MC SWEENEY, GARY W MC KINNEY, GEORGE L MC SWEENEY, CARMEN 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 210 20942 E GLEN HAVEN CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 NORTHVILLE MI 48167 - 2465 MERRITT, GORDON E MERRITT, M SUZANNA 661 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1561 MICHAEL, BASKOVICH MICHAEL, SANDRA 2866 QUAIL HOLLOW RD W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - NATSIS, EVANGELOS NATSIS, MARIA 622 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1638 NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH DEVELOP PO BOX 4189 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189 PARKS, DANA L BARKES, MICHAEL G 11961 LOCUST LN COLUMBUS IN 47201 - PETER PAN DEV 610 MAN DALAY N E CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1632 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 EASTSHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 RHOADS, JEFFREY L THE PO BOX 861 DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0861 SEIFERT, MICHAEL E SEIFERT, NANCY S 5825 PERSIMMON DR MADISON WI 53711 - 5003 NEIL, MARIE-THERESE 4 RUE DE SAVOIE PARIS 75006 00017 - FRANCE PALMA, GEORGE 32 FORGE DR DOWNSVIEW ON M3N 2R3 00030 - CANADA PASQUALE, JACK R THE PASQUALE, PATRICIA A THE 1433 NORMAN DR DARIEN IL 60561 - 4434 PIOLI, RICHARD T THE PIOLI, ROBERTA B THE 750 ISLAND WAY # 402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1820 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES 12003 LILLIAN AVE SEMINOLE FL 33772 - ROLLINSON, ANN C 1364 ELLINGTON RD SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06040 - 2403 SILLASEN, SEAJAYE 12313 W LOUISIANA AVE LAKEWOOD CO 80228 - v MEROLI, PETRIT 967 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MOSSER, RICHARD S 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 301 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1536 NICHOLAS, JERRY 3002 STRAWBERRY RD #OFC PASADENA TX 77502 - 5230 PARALITICCI, JESUS 611 POINSETTIA AVE # 103 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - PENTHOUSE SHORES ASSN INC 661 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1561 PORPOISE INN INC 609 CYPRUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1621 RADAY, DAVID M YOUNG, SEAN 12003 LILLIAN AVE N SEMINOLE FL 33778 - 3504 ROZENITS, FRED ROZENITS, ANNA 31 ISLAND WAY # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2207 SMITH, RUPERT W JR SMITH, IRENE V 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 SNO-BIRD PROP INC SOBOLESKI, JAMES W SPEAR, ROBERT E THE 10 PRINCE ST 191 DEVON DR 102 CARRIAGE SQUARE CT CUMBERLAND CTR ME 04021 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - HENDERSONVILLE NC 28791 - 4007 1396 SPERELAKIS, NICHOLAS SR SPERELAKIS, DOLORES J 12114 PAULMEADOWS DR CINCINNATI OH 45249 - 1330 STANLEY, BRYAN J 114 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - TSE TSE LLC 610 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - VERBAN,STEVE VERBAN, HELEN K 55 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 WHITEHURST, DON R 1801 SE US HIGHWAY 19 CRYSTAL RIVER FL 33767 - 1815 WOSCHITZ, EVA THE 302 POINSETTIA LAND TRUST 10 COURTWOOD PL TORONTO ON M2K 1 Z9 00030 - CANADA SPERELAKIS, NICHOLAS SR SPERELAKIS, DOLORES J 12114 PAULMEADOWS DR CINCINNATI OH 45249 - 1330 THOMPSON, MICHAEL S THOMPSON, MARIA BRENDON FEN POND RD IGTHEHM NEAR SEVEN OAKS KENT TN15 9JE 00003 - GREAT BRITAIN TSETSE LLC 5210 WEBB RD TAMPA FL 33615 - 4518 WAGNER, LARRY H THE 240 WINDWARD PSE # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2249 WICKY, JERRY E WICKY, BETTY W PO BOX 1191 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 1191 SPRING TIDE INVESTMENTS II LLC 622 BYPASS DR STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - THURMOND, WILLIAM H THURMOND,CAROLH PO BOX 478 NEW ELLENTON SC 29809 - 0478 VASILOUDES, PANAYIOTIS VASILOUDES, HELEN 767 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WHITE, ANDREA P 55 SOMERSET ST # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 WINCHESTER, GARY WINCHESTER, PAMELA 17111 HANNA RD LUTZ FL 33549 - 5666