The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-05046FLD2005-05046 700 DRUID RD RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES °` Planning Department " CASE #: ~ 100 South Myrtle Avenue DATE RECEIVED: Clearwater, Florida 33756 RECEIVED BY (staff initials): Telephone: 727-562-4567 ATLAS PAGE #: Fax: 727-562-4865 ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: D SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including NORTH: 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans SOUTH: WEST: ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) W FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION .~° ~ ` ~ ~ ~° ~ -. a Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: {'`C La (~, )OVA GO NLM.U N 1'T ~/ ~ 2y l cES ~ IJ C_ MAILING ADDRESS: JO 3 50uTE} M1..1.L A~-~ t'i~-~IIQ.~~T~-~ ~°L- ?i'7~,~ii PHONE NUMBER: 7 Z 7 ~ y t"I ~ Z~ FAX NUMBER: ~ Z.7 5''~ 7 ~ -~'-) '7 PROPERTY OWNER(S): ~~ U l~ lOV`~ Cf~ IVINLVN 1Ty SE1(L,V 6 C-ES f ~ N Ca (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: _~1~ 1l M ~~ E~ , ,/L41 /~ n MAILING ADDRESS: ~ ~ ~ D D/~t~C.N V t`'S~ 'c..'~ /t/'t J~ O (,,~ ~(~, 33 77~ PHONE NUMBER: 7Z-7 5~f 5 7 t'O ('7 FAX NUMBER: 72-? SG rJ ~~ 3 B CELL NUMBER: 7~7 `'~3O ~-113Z- E-MAIL ADDRESS:MYC~t~17A1!LL-~- (p (X •1J~TGOM•t.Dl+/~ B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: tt1~~~<.~,,.-5 ~b(7 ~',~'~ N ~/ 7~ U12V Ili 1~t7 , GL.E.A1i2W f~Ta<K- ~{.- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .iG-t S V 12VE Y (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 1 S 2..cj 1S S~~,S~ OZ-(e ODl! 1 `' ' '~ ; ,~ G ... PARCEL SIZE: ~ • C9 (O ~I ~, G.~.•~E (acres, square feet) ' ~ _ ^ PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): _~O b (;Lo~_.A1~94C - SOC-1~ L.. SF t2~J t CE..~ v c (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) r DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST{S):/' EE ~T'TALN~D rZEQtJ ~~T' Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A P EVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED} SITE PLAN? YES NO ~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ~ ' ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVtT~TTE~tt'~.Q1gGQtk~~J.~lp fs e page 6) A T`C~,~,~ E1'~ ""~- t D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) I ^ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacen~~proper3n which it is located. ~ , THt- t(•~utt_©tNC~ ~h -1~1,5T~/~ r ANC ONI..~/ Tt-(F y~-XT ~t~~ C~'tt~ ~C-_ IMPiRDyr' ~ T1-t~ lJ~N17 G4tat~1C9! '(~F.~lUt~ t~it..t_. ~- ~~~t7C~iNA-rF-T~ c ~~Ti-~ a r~! r- ~. ~ D \A~r.-.r=te- (~ t2C) fit= 2T~ E.5 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. T1 ~2D\FL-t- t.Jtl,t_ GtJCUu2tE~~Lc.,~.~~E.._Lk.'PI°~'~.t~T~ t.Z`~ [7~ AO JA ~r/NT t.-AN D t,J tTt-t 11"5 tiy1,~ ~ v - ®/aQ PE,~~(~,A N G.t AND LANDSCA ~ t 1J 1/f AfJ D ~o~t.~ '(Z~~S T~-1E. 5vn.t~.ouN~tNU ~~~ ~-~cy yAt~uC..S. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. ~"~~ NO Ao-c tvt-rY ,~.5~ Lt ~-~p (,~ rt-t-~ -[}.- t (~t2b Gt 12A M T!-~ w t L.t_. . . ~~... .._r-, Fvr~ t_~ toy t~ Td C~tSTYZ,t 3v'c~ rood -C~ .NE~AY ~o tJ~~ot_..c~5, 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. t,Jr; CX~ f~1oT EX(~-Fr-s- ~ ors t-t u~NA~ ~ ~ ~~tr~,..Ga~j. Tt_lC~n t'~ t Ttic~ (~,~ ° F ~tE aNE vyAy l~t5t_E~ (fit=-5tn~ ~} >r3ut~htt.~r„ wtt_t.- cLEA~2.tFy /aN~ M1,N~M~2t= /atJy P©5~a t ~ E..,_r,. ~?N -z S-t-~rh 1 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. _~EvFi~~P~,~t'T- i5 t N SrA~€ c~ tTt-! oT ~Gr(Z c-~A~F you SFS t N Tit r ~i2.~/~- A~'D TNF tM~Pt2~v>=~ L./~N~C1~~p~NC~ n/t ~F-c Mr~~F o~ Ttr4F t ~ ~N/~T ~ t-1~. ~ ~-~-~J ~ 5 ST~2av ~ N G, ~o R,. . 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. TI-tE E X TE~t yt2 9 E'a t U N 6 n,lt~ v~ 5 `t NF Lr~o t,~ o~ T1-} E 1(~v 1 t-D I1~C ~. AN R -tNE G~vMp~ i E12 ENc.>,o5v~~ t.Jtt..i.._ ~oN-rAtN T<~E ~t t9- ~ ANA 5M t_S /~vc.t,4TF CJ ti TIC 1 T' ~~i/~~~ t t,p t N(a y~P~~2.4-~ ~ ~121N(~ -~oRM/~i_ ~~v'(L5 $ ~'°aM - yov P~1 /,~JD op~N TU ~~F~ T.5 i ~ 3Oau~ -3~~ ^ Provide complete responses to the ten (10} COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed fot development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards, w-T'c4nuZ T~ Fi..EacA~t t.~-rX ~tJ SE.TC3~ht.a,z.5, ADD t,ANr~stAP,< ~~~~e,.~, /~~Jp 1~'r~t2tdt2 t_ANDS~.AWtN(~ ThttS tMP~vGNT t.Sovl.,p 6~ -nn~o55tY~~ Dul/ Td 1/X-~aT-NC~, ~oNDt'~to~15 Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 2. The devebpment of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the -site with the improvements. ) "t'lkE. ~-!~/~P ~RDJ~M.E N'f~ TO T1'~'C (J~117~PE~.'N t.J t ~t, O t~ t--ll A Od V~4 t..U Try rt t-R,~ --A~t.~'crtntG ~~taPE'2'~!E`~ w ~Tt-t - ~5 6ETTE~L ~pp1~,12ANc..~ /arJt~ t_ArlD SCAj~~a . 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. ~~~ 1~5F 15 GJ12fL.~c1~T1..`,/ ,G~N b t..~ t LL tit= M N. ~ N SUG.ti~l.., sjf=.12V 1 C..~S~ 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. `i~}~ FOG>D ~A*SU_ 'P`R.(~C9-~~,M 15 GoM.`P~{T1 A+d,-L- ,~.~.1~fLf> tNGr, lZ"~ __Zc`~N-NG~ /~Nn ~4t7.)~.r~T t_~ktJC~ ~s5/~(~~-. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. '~E= ~t?~[3A-L. Loo~~ SEv~ii2At_ ~i:./~CLS Fv,~ l~N ~'~A TUArT ~otJ LD t~SOT GYZEAT~ v+~,12>C N~42~~-k 1'P y ht OtJit2 T/~d2L-AFT ~PD(~ V}''~01.~• W-Tt-} t.ANO ^~ ~x~PENStvE. ~~5 t_vcA-r~o-J t,.~AS ou~2 oNt~Y o~p~ttnN• 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. TN E. ~ ~ ~o SIc TZI~N LZ~~,7 tL~}_'~ ~.•~ t t..t_. ~ E.1 ~!U tr2E 1N SCALC- tit? ~-IA~F(L.. t,.)1't"tr} -tf-~ }j~t2 c~vND1NC,r~ /-~c~(Z[-'~4 '~~-rLDVG~E uhf o~F ,q N~ ~ ~A~D~ 1~N~D t_..4t~flhc.4rPtti1CU . 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. T--1-E ~iKoPo SEA FA C..~4 D f/ /a tJ c~ vyt~a ~.A t_ ~PAc~ 'C"A U N Gr, TH 6 p t t~J,>=u-~'~ T1Z4 t ll. 1„S t t_l.. E,NI~ANC.E T~ E c.NA~LA ~-'~~., of "t"1-~ E c[~ Mn~.~rt 1TY.,~N,~ A~ ~ ~y IC~E,A V TY ~~ A~(ZT /aNc~ L~ND~A~P-NC~ 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ~LE ~G1 f~ t t-t't'Y (~ t l.t~. hU,©~ F7~~(Z 1 MaP 2bv1~D t~.A;NV~CA P t N(~ /~N ~J T~Gy2 Tt24~t r. (~AT-c~_NS ~F A~t_~Tt F Y - t~~ T+~t~ ~4~CA A.ND tM~'Ko~l/ ~F, vtE~1 ~Rc>M ~ TY~A IL 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. G~ 1 t~ N TS,,.. -t~~ ~,1~N D yo Lu NT*~,~5 Ia l.t,,- y't t t_t zE T t-i E Y'~ i2.1c. t NU I-k t~ fiE.D ~6 tN~- f--v~t~ ~QRN1F. oN St,T~- /~tJD AC~55 TF~E ST12~F~T"/'~T~ 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. 1T' 15 NoT" ~-t~c./•~-~L~ ttJ ~ttF fJb~NTa~IJ GJ-~-tt2~L'C' . _. r-j ~,- ~ ~~~tvttvr~ y ~~~.. 1 2 ` r. ' ~~ ~_ ; ~ f -, ' -_~" ,,~~~~~ Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Com fSreMensrve infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Cleartitiater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with 1 City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; _ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall vided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ All dimensions; _ North arrow; ~, ° ~, _ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; a R I ~ ` ~ ~ ' 'i ~ Location map; _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included. in package; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; ~..~ __ _ All existing and proposed points of access; f i-•^ ; i ~ d ~ ~ ~ `, _ All required sight triangles; ~ +, ,_ ~ , _ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses pcts~~cimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife ha iit~sr!~tc; ~l 4. _ Location of all public and private easements; i ~,~ ,~ 'f ~ " . ~ , _ Location of all street rights-of--way within and adjacent to the site; ~ ~; ~~ `_~~ Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application r., ~,.• = iriiy of Clearwater ``~ I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; O REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/: X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/: X 11) (color), ff submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager orhis/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750} Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 0 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ~~ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESU!_TS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City represent isit and photograph the property in this applic tion. Signature of property owner or representative BEftf. •: SPRUIII Public • State of Flottdo STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELI.AS // Swor _ t and subscribed before me this (a~ day of A.D. 20 d --~e--rnc~--audlor by Vv~ o ~s personally-.-~ 1' has pro used as ident~ tion. tary public, My commission expires: S- 7_-~ y10g" ~-. ~: •MVCormnieelonB4~~W~~7° .~f ~,~,~~.` DV~nrn~.+7 Nottond Pbl0fyAlMl ~,~ ~. ~, .... Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Replication 2005- City of Clearwater `. J ~:.~ 'l nh lily ,,i AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: ~1.-~lst~~5 corvl,n~vNITY SEY~.vtic.ES~t~1y (Names of all property owners on deed -please PRINT full names) 1. That (1 am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): t2L.~ MoD I(?~/~N1~. '?(.~O p~vt[7 rl'LD G-l.E/~r2~AT~12- Ft... 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint: s,~y M ~~ ~ /"'~ ~'~1 as (hisitheir) agents} to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE~~AS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by t laws oft State f Florida, on this LG~ day of C1 c~'~personally appeared (} v~ i C ~° ~ who having been first duly sworn Depose and says that jte/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. ,,~ ~., ~ My Commission Expires:.' c~' ~®~ ~° BETTS R. SPRUIII Notory PubNc • Sfafe o1 fbtkio nM Comrr~ob n E~iet MaV 2, 2~B CommlWon ~ DD29Tbbi Bonded By No>pond NotaryMln. S:IP/arming DepartmentlAppfication Formsldeve%pment reviewltiexible development comprehensive infill application 200 JUL Q 7 200'5 ®EP E ~ FLEA ATER Page 7 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater .JUL-05-2005(TUE) 09:16 RCS ~ ~'~~ ,. ~` ~t _... ~~ ~~ Fo~-d ~aa RCS Programs: Grace Ficuse 'fhe Miaven Stepping Stone 1:iCS Thrift Store FMCS Food F3enk June 6, 2005 City of Clearwater Planning ~ep~'tment 7Q0 Druid ~ioad, weal • Dlearwatar, 1`[. 3375fi Telaphorta (727} 443-~U37 • i+a7c (72?a 44~•~~7~ rpantrat Qr tampabeyrrcom 'lid: F~.172005-050406- 704 77~nud Road Clearruatcr, FL 33'756 R~: Letter of iacampleteaess # 7 Ia the vicinity of the lr~cation of the RCS Toad Bank there are several businesses that r$nge from x7octor's Q~ces, funeral 1~vmes and Churches to warehousing and manu~'acturing of goods, The ncaresfi social service agency is located at 1100 Cleveland Street. Thus, there are no ether social service providers within 1,500 feet of ttxe RCS ood Bank~~~..} Zan~ia t~ustin 17irc~tor ~_~. ~, ,_ .. ORIGW~1L . ~7!'~ ... w • • ~~~ N un~tad way P. 0111011 ~- _ R F ~ ~ -._ ~UL-G5-20G5(TUE) G9. 16 • ~.~~ ~~ `~ ~~ ~ RCS Fro rams: Grace House 'the Havetl Stepp(ng Stara FIGS Tt7rift St~ro ICS Food t3arik June b, 20t~5 700 >an.tid F~oad, West * Cleat~wate~r, F~ 3~75G T~le~ahane (7~7? 443-4031 • >:ax (7~~ 44S^~874 rpantry ~ tarnpabay.rrcom City Of Cl~rvvater4 Planning and I7evelopmeat Services Municipal Services wilding Re. Case Sununary :200-00405 7Q0 Arttid Rc-ad Religious Community Services Rcqut ~'lexfble Development appravai to permit the t;xpan5it~rt and rcnavatian of Haar area of an existing sociaVpablic service agency with .from 144 feet to 5$ feet (along Myrtle Avenue) , a reduction to tha front {South along Ds~ttid Read) set beak fram 2S feet to five feat (to existing paveraent~ a reduction to the front (east slang Myrtle Avenue) see back fram 25 feet toi5 feet (to existing pavcmcnt),a reduction to the side (east) set back fram 1CI feet to Q {zero) feet (ta existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 0 (zero) feet (ta testing pavement), as a Comprehensive ~ti~il Redevclaprnent Project, under the previsions o>i;' Section 2-744,0, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along ~h'uid Road (south) fram 14 fart to S feet (ta existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the last from S feet to 4(aero) feot {to existing pavemenrt), a reduction to the landscape buffer afang the West fram 5 feat (ta acisring pavement) cad a rcxiuctian to interior landscape area from 1© percent te'~.4 pa'cent, as a Caraprchensive T..andscape Program, under the previsions ref Section 3-1202.Cr. P.GIGIGII E~ ~~~ -v n ORIGINAi_ M YERS & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE, AIA, P.A. AA-0003461 .............................................................................................. 9170 Qakhurst Rd., Suite 3B Seminole, Florida 33776 JULY 7, 2005 Re: FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Rd. Religious Community Services -Food Pantry To Whom it May Concern: The following are responses to the questions posed June 30, 2005 from the DRC- 1) We spoke with Don Melone and no right-of-way permit is required. 2) We are installing a sprinkler system, located the FDC, and have provided a fire department "T". 3) The plant table was revised for the tree minimum heights and made sure all plants in sight triangles were under 30". 4) The fences will have no gates, and any fences within the setcacks have been revised to 3'. Signs were also added to clearify the traffic circulation on site. 5j A landscape application was resubmitted, the only change being the attatched request for varience. 6) The Flexible Development - Infill Project form has been clarified and resubmitted. 7J The current Just market value of the project is $595,000.00, and estimated value after improvements is $1,315,500.00. Respectfully, RECEIVED Jay F. Myers Myers and Associates Architecture, Inc. I ® ~E F ClEARiAIATER Phone: X2"1-595-'I104 Fax: °1~'i-595-'118 E-mail: myer5arah~ix.netcam.cam .... .... . ......... ... Clearwater ~~ Q SUBMIT ORtGINAI STONED AAI[7 n~eTeRnFn APpUCAT10N O SUBMR 1 COPT( OF TttE ORIGINAL. A-PPUCATION ~cluding voided site plan plllit•V AIYL 11VVV ~ V V J ~. DATE RECEIVED: Rl;CENED BY (staff inftiala); ATLA$ PAGE Al: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICAtlON: 20NING 81.,AND USE GtASSlFICA710N OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH' t soUTN: / ~" vuEST: i EAST: _ / "' Planning and Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33758 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax'727-562-4576 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS <>~•~ca vnsnooi! D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 41001) APPUCANTNAME: ~ iou Communit Services, Food Bank MAIUN6AaaRE88: 700 Druid Road Clearwater FL 33756 PHONE NUMBER; _ _ FAX NUMBER: 7 2 7_ 4 4 3- 6 8 7 4 PROPERTYOwNER(S): Reli ious Community Services, Inc. (Must include ALA owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) MAIUNraADDRESS: akh t Rd S ite 3 B seminole FL 33776 PHONENUML~R: 727-595-7100 FAX NUMBER: 727-595-7138 Tire (artdscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or mod~ed as a part of a Level Ont3 or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, d the application for development approwai includes a Comprehensive l..endscape program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sectionslelevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the information provided an this worksheet: 1. Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings propose0 or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. The landscaping that is planned is intended to soften the impact of the existing buildin which as virtuallay no landscaping. Thi is bein done alon with additional fenestrations and architect- . x,: ORIGINAL V v. V V V V V a r. -> V a <> t> t r. v V V. 1 4 V 14 1 L> v/ A t v L A J J V y„/. V V V OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive landscape Program is automatlcaily controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. There is existin arkin lot li htin on the site for security. There is no lands e li htin ro osed 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The landscape deisgn is intended to coordinate with the proposed prst~ „_the L~ of the sam type of plant ert Alon the o se a buffer of trees and the railroad track and the trail. ~ .~ ~ ~ ;, t'..;, ~ t of :. UtflUS/LUUS 1L:9V !'AX /Ll~2f~/1Jt5 1nYCriJ AtvU HJJV ~+. vv, 4. Property Values. The land treatment proposed in the Comprehensi~andscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the Immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The esisting site has virtually no landscaping we in- rPnCf rn ramnvP Pxi cr i ng = avPmanr antl Lant- all n~ the area the where the pavement has been removed-the landscaping will coordinate wi th t-hc not nhhnrc f-n f-l,o T~Tnrth ,yy~~`-;1st nl an i-n G[^~YPPn i n A f~'~_ Pl7t~T mPnt' anC~ lima GtPr~ w; t-h the ~amP ~ y~ o PV fencing that is used at the ~Qctors office t~ th a of the site This should add fttr~hPr ttni fi r-rati nn to t-hc~ Gi tP area 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed In the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed far development is located. We plan to plant trees and hedge material along the west side_ of the p~aerty and along the exiGtin Pinellas,Trail Please return checklist for review and verification. 6. That (I/rvg), the and®rslgned authority, hereby Certify that the foregoing is tr d correct, ,,,,~~ww Dime t3 ~A1ltr ~~ ~ f• aM Comm1~ pp Property Owner w'" F.~b~+Naf~ ».1opS Property Owner COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLOR~.DA, Before me thg undersigned, do officer duly commissioned by the law6 of the State of Florida, l ~3~~ day of on this dd~peraonally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fugy understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she sigr>od. .. My Commlaslon Expires: / / ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ Notary bltC S: eppUcation forms development review/comprehensive IandsGape program application d~,r,- ?~ ~ _ c [1 ¢ ~': tye :~ i1. S ~;M1't.. . . l Z f~ ~.~ 4^ ~ i ~UL-05-2005(TUE) 09:16 RCS Prayrams: Grace House The Haven stepping Mane RCS Thrifk Store RGS Food lank June 6, 2005 ((''~~ .,~ ~~1.~~ ' ~~ ~'p ~ 70q Clr~tid Roed, Walt • Cieannratar, E+~ 33756 Telephone t727~ Mi3-4031 • Fax (727} 443-6874 rpantry c~ tampabay.rrcom i~ity t)f Clearwater~l rlaruling and Development Services Munitiipal Servicrs Building Re: Case Summary k~20©~-050~4t16 7010 Druid Road Religious Gommuai~y Services Rcqut p'lexi'ble Devclapmcrrt approval to permit the expansion and renovatzc-n of floor area of art existi>1g sociaUpublio service agency with from 100 feet to 58 feet (along Myrtle ,Avenue) , a reduction to the front (South along 3~ruid Road} set back from 25 feet to five feet (to existing pavement}, a reduction to the front (cast mans Myrtle Avenue) set back from 25 feet to15 feet (to cxistins pavemcnt),a reduction to the side (east} set back fratn I O feet to 0 {zero) feet (to exisdag pavement} and a reduction to the side (west} setback from 10 feet to 0 (zero) feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive ~nfill R,edcvclaprncntProjcct, under the provisions oir Section ?r~04,G, with a reduction to the lardscape buffer along Druid Raad {south} from 10 feet to 5 feet {to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the Fast from S feet to 0{zero) feet (to exsstins pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer alt-ng tha West from 5 fact (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area :i'xom 10 percent to7".4 percent, as a Comprcttensive Landscape Progs'am, under the provisions of Setrtion 3-1202.G. N. uiurui i RAp.ROAD I _ ~ ~ 1 - a./ BO I I ~ ~ ; I t~~~ I ~ ~ 1 ~w~ -A ~.~', [ ~ ea 15.89°14'1"E. I ppi "`~ I ~. I ~ 5 1I I =s .~ L~ 1 ' ' -15.10'(Gd5) I 0001 5.89°14'04"E. I V~ ~ \ i k ~ ~ ~P1 51R - ~T•?~~ `~~ I 60.00'(Ge5) Ep0 I I ~ g~ r0 Be ~~ mm~ O PRCrOXD IBlG' b ~F y R.,'' Z », r` Rc+o,RO ON PwPeR ° _ "'~" 4 _ ~ _ I s - 5.89°74'04"E. 14W. '(G!5) I 51R F~ Y ` O ~ ~ _ = ' ~_. rob - ~1 O'- - _- _ ~ lA,,, I - a~ °°`rT ~3'o`~ j e I I ro ~ ~ -- ~ I ~:~ t~ N QF~ •TM I F I wlosu+i+~e I '-'~'me#`-'re e"L~ I ~,a I I M F C~ ~ i° s R I i ~ I F ~i ry ~ ~~~ o ~~•~~ ~ I a .~ .~ ~ J s ~ ~ ~ : , ~ ~ ~ I I vHVxxNS Ito 5EIHACK uNE °' `'""~ I nl ~I V ~'~t ~^! 1 .vc rblce I bIl Dswew'~sl, -rcle -P - I s.eeD k4'' e°D~ ro x T~ r . .3, ~s,..' 3•'~ I I ---- -§_' 3 - ------ L u~ R I suw. newlslE +o HiN ~°'ov =nl° s' tr I FL. 03~., 09E ,, ~\~ 516N GJ11(.REIC eQYW K TO F -9/H' I iD-1~' ~6ee OF PFOPeRx fI I Ia. ID./ I ~ edl•I~ eNeoRe~INa, ,I' ~T_ .,.:.. 5e 1 - 1 ~ m T ~,y..- ~ ` I _ I I~ I T _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - I J I I I -\ I I II I ~I I I I I I a I 1 1 I I j al I I 1 1 ~ ~ , I ' I I F I SHEET INDEX: ^I I~I , I I I I ui METAL COMMERCIAL ~ Q I I I ~ A-t TE P I~ YI BUILDING ON R ~ I I I t0 1 1 CONCRETE SLAB I I I ~ A-~ ELEVArIONe 16 / 19 / 15 / 54450 / 026 / 0010 I ~ 1 ~i ><-r~ 9x ~I I t i i ~ Qo i A-3 DETA115 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ O CMG AND PAVING PLAN a+n x`Q" I I of ~;...~~7y~ I I ~ N LpNp5~p~ t ~ I - I' 1 n ~ I ~ i L-1~,~APE PLAN Frr~ M ~ ~ Ri v 1 O ~,J I ~ ~ : ,~` I I q I I~ I 6 yy , ~ ! - - I $ 3 GMSeY S~ i; s Cout St ''~" Ir I I C I~ ( I I $ ~Q ~ '~T" T~~ ~~ I I ~re~re P'-"ego ~ I F i I I ~ ~ SITE DATA TABLE: a ~ ~ ,f PMR ~ NPUw R OT.Sp' ' O J t9.b I 5rtE AREA 46,346.5 50 FT. (1.064 /K.RES) ~~ i ~ lPM II Mr„ __ _ N 'aiG 5K • yes ~, I E%15TIN6 / FROP05ED DYELLINb UNITS -. N/A dW Ra g~ (r ~ Uwmn. Wry O 9 _ g~~` Q - bR0'.f FLOOR PREA v'IAREt1PfiE - 9'I~B9 SQ FT ~W M 7f +f~~ ~ y (~ ~, ~ I I ~~ ~ OFFKE - 6,439.4 50. FT. eM T ~1 ~ 5- ~O- ~O PaRKINb. BUIIDINb-16,166.350. 5T TOTK ~P • 3 PER 100050. FT. • 49 5PPOE5 RFG21X¢m rr RaLROAn _ I ~ ~, p ~.~«as s, sTOr/so ~ f, - 14~t I 2I I • NOTE: 34 SPACES PROVILED oN 517E ADDIr10NAL PARKINb base C«/M A '~ 516NAL LANOeGA•! ~~ ?' ' e R Y ~ y I YtlLL BE AT 5T. GECELIA5 UIUI¢GH DIAGONALLY ACR :5 ' ~ Wert I s. HIRTLE AVEMJE PEASE REFER ro LETTER FROG 3' ! F6rMS ,4, e'4' z4'o' LECELIAS, SEPTEM2ER 2CCTOt ATTACHED. 3 yti,y~lle T+WMn9j 6 {ft~ ~ /ew~x ~ D9 Ouee.D T 1 PR~3/8" TOTAL IMPERVIQX. MGFJLNGVS-T 663.350 F'_ C MO LD.) m,, we. ^ ~ L~fe~.6W ~ N~yn ~~ RR z-wa Nl9tpt_ _ _ ~J _?? ~ _ _L_ I !~ `.•, I ~ OTAL_ 39,6630.3 R. FT GAR 9 ueu ~ I m ~ ~, II-+PERVIg15 RATIO (1581 39,663.3/46 3L6.5 = H5.6% OF SITE LOGATI~N MAP fGM-4,~ N 9° 11 /y. 15J.6 M/ I O 1 vEHKJ1L-4¢ USE RATIO 7,663.3/46.366.5.59.7%OF 517E •'(NO ID) ~Gw~FFC'TQRe- ~_ _ - - PIR-1/3- WiLDINb HEIGHT. 31' - 01/3.. I// ~_r 9Kwr 1RIMIbI[ MO I.D.) enHT nelw~6LE r nl~tr FAR t5T FLCtOR 11 619 650. FT e' iw CONGel2 ReOKD ~D ~ ~ 21m FLL~R. 4,4BB.15Q. FT. TOTAL. 16.168.3 50. FT AMON TO HRT Gtt Q R[PIXeD rvm Np'v H G2MYNTSI GONL1.CtE emerwx r0 TOTAL 50 .Fi. / 517E •36.996 9TANDMDe me[9 PROPGRx --Te DRUID ROAD INTERIOR LAfIDSGMINb. ~ D66.3a 5a. Fr. n.a% of rorAL1 Cn,,:, eo' Res»r-oF+w.. DATA FOR THiS SITE ORNWN6 YVAS TAKEN FROM AYNALT PAVMB.T J.NDSGAPN6 TA9LE'. 5FE LANDSCAPE PIJN A ~vEY DATED t0/13/O6 GPf2Rm O. TT 2v Caere ~ WPNEC BRINKMAN.PSr•I •am6 416 N .EFFERSON AvENUE ~ fLEeR1NATER, FL. 3315SaT32 T ~ P1 .-131-441-3t3t , 517E PL.~N N ~_1 OF RENOVATION OF BUILDING FOR RG5 FOOD BANK ~~ & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE AIA PA 9170 OAKHURST ROAD SUITE 3B SEMINOLE, FLORIDA JAY F. MYERS 4959 A-2B '100 DRUID RD, GLEARWATER, FLORIDA 727 - 595 - 7100 FAX 727 - 595 - 7138 myersarch@ix.netcom.com # AA -0003461 Oo O J ~L Z I V ~ `~ IF I ~ ~~ ~ II WDN LP pP " I 1 4 I ' I ~ I I I I I ~~~ ~ L11.~1 I ~ I 1 I ,e I I I S I I I I I I I81 I ~ i I I I I 6' GONG GURB I T\ ~ILLf9 1 I a~ ran,E PSG FeNCE ~ 1 WHITE we FENGE I e~eura¢ v I ° r- -~ -- ------j I I --- -- 3 I 15.6, I I I I - ~ - - - - - I ----~--------- I I I I I I I wI I '. Z I ~I ~I METAL GOMMERGIAL I BUILDING ON I GONGRETE SLAB . ^ ~ #~oo I I I I I I 10 I ~ e f; ~ REMO~/E PGDGGARPUS I I ~~ GA66AGE PAL"! I I- ~ I REMOVE PODOGAR~ w.ILROAD .STOP/GO y~y SIGNAL 6" GOWG I Ex15T NG RR X-Plb ~ y. GURB \ Q i PINES-wry GATE ~y ~ ~ ~ TRIANGLE 15 TRIANGLE 1~ '~ I EXISTMG OAK J I (STRAIGHTEN) I OHI 1 POSED FIRE 3 6" GONG Gll 1LNIDER I ~ uNlr I v I 4 6 PVG E ° e ~ TT~ .4 1 I I (EX15 ) 51GHT TRIANGLE I I ~J--' ~- I I ------7---------- ~- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ I I I I I I I I Z ~ :p I I I I I I I I I i I I I I ~ I ZI ~ I I I I I d~ ~ ~I I I I I I ~I I o I ~ °I I I I ~ I w I I' 6 I - I I I I I' I I Z I k tae' -- I I I I •~E ::k ~ I I I ~ ~ I ~ I I ~~d•` I ~ ,.pp ~O I ~ i I I LANDSCAPE PI I 5ca e: 1 = - 105 _ ) 3fa- ~_~ ~I ~,~,~ Iz ~~ •osm I Q ~~ TRIANGLfE ~~ ~ v m O O _~ ~ `"--, ,, i --~, ~a7 i s ~ ~ <~' ~ ~"' i ~ --9 FIR-1/~" (NO I DJ 2 0 6. r~-r ~~ °' wa a y a 6 ag ~ ~ a °z_ e m .. r N F N fi O S pppyyy~fff _~ ~' r zn V 0 4 ~- u~ 4 I I ~ v I e _~I ~ I~ Q I I I rl 6" GONG GUR6 I I tl _ ' NHITE PJG FENCE I 4' NHITE PVG F I WDN LP RAILROAD STOP/60 516NAL 8 I I I I .. ---- -- -~- -- ------ / I I ~, - - I~ 15 6' ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ I I I I 4 b' PVG P GE ,~ !EXISTI G I . I \ I I i .4 I I N ) SIGHT TRIANGLE _ _ - I - - _ _ . _ --~-------- _ I I I ~ I -_ -~-J ----r- I -------- ~ I i ~ I I I I I - --------- I I -- I wl I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I ~I ~~I I I METAL COMMERCIAL ° ~ I I I I wl I I I I I I BUILDING ON ~ dPP I I CONCRETE 5LAB ~ I I x'700 I ~i i F i I ~ I 5 I I , I I I °~ I I .b 1O Q I -I I I I ~ w n ~ I RE1~,,~ DOCaFF~~~ I AND G:,..~ GE =ALM f l I I - - I I I o I - I I i I 27.5' I ~ k 19 6' _ H/G~ . -. I I E u~`GUB •IG,>~ ~~T~~ _ C~• ~ .:I: ~ ~ < I I I . o- -'~ I ExISrIN~ oAx ~STRAI~HTEN, I v Pr I y y I ,,gypp, L~ND5G~4~E PL1~N 6" GOMG CURB Q _ I ~ p I _; EXISTNG PINES I I ~ I SCALE: 1" = 40' OSED IRE ON NG CURB "T I I RR X-ING - W ., ? I I GATE I . I ~ ® •. - I 5.89°21'S9"E. 150.18'(M) +T TRIAh GCE 15 EX1571NG DWARF OLANDER ,OS ~ _ C.ONGRETE CURB _ EXISTMIb DETERIORATMb SIGHT TRIANGLE 4' 51DEY~WLK TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WtTN NEW 5' CONCRETE 51DF1NALK TO ED6E5 OF PROPEI¢TY ~ - c - ~ v Qz m O O 0 06/06/05 r ~ ~~ ~a r 0 a ~ ~ Sa ~ {pay[ ~ t.7 ~ N 0 N ~ r X N ~ 0 8 ~ h P ~°? ~~~ Q ~a ~, ~: 9 . ~7 ~'.. O y~-~ ~~9 ~~g / J FIR-1/~" ~ (NO I.D.) ~' MEZZANINE -- 10'_8„~ PAINTED L16HT BLU NORTH ELEVATION Scale: i/8" = 1'-0" NHITE PAINTED STUC.GO PAINTED LIGHT B SOUTH ELEVATION Scale: VS" = 1'-0" ROOF HEIGHT /2,~- Z SLAB _~MEAN ROOF HEIGHT MEZZANINE -~-X0-_8., - - FLOOR SLAB ~O'-0' `N.. ~~+.~ ~_2~ RENOVATION OF BUILDING PoR RG5 FOOD BANK ~~ & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE AIA PA FLORIDA 9170 OAKHURST ROAD SUITE 3B SEMINOLE JAY F. MYERS 4959 OP A-2B "100 DRUID RD, GLEARWATER, FLORIDA , 727 - 595 - 7100 FAX 727 - 595 - 7138 myersarch@ix.netcom.com # AA -0003461 t1, ~ N tj O O z ~i • l -7 ~~ r~~. 0 ~-- MEAN ROOF HEIGHT 21'-0 1/~" • DARK BLUE F1EDAIM BWE STUGC,O PANEL! PAINTED L16HT BUJEJ EA~JT ELEV,4TION Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" FLOOR 5LA8 °~-0"~ i -. ..~ ' r !. ~ F ~'.;' -~ t ' li ~ T rr l~I ~t-2B OF RENOVATION OF BUILDING FOR RG5 FOOD BANK NIy$I~ gz ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE AIA PA 91'70 OAKHURST ROAD SUITE 3B SEMINOLE, FLORIDA JAY F. MYERS 4959 P~-2B 100 DRUID RD, GLEARWATER, FLORIDA 777. 595 _7100 FAX 727 - 595 - 7138 myersarch@ixnetcom.com # AA -0003461 0 ~ ~`` ~~~'"°{ ~n ~ O ~., :_:, • z r • 700 DRUID RD a ~ `~~ ~ .-u~o~ PlANNdNt~ & ~EVr! t~t~,,r~~7 SVC~ Date RecelVed: 05/26/2005 F~ELIGIOUS COl~ZMUNITY SERVICES I ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 295B PLANNER OF RECORD: WW C~WCoverSheet ---------- --~_.. ~tiz~~ _~ ~~11, v~~~c~cvVy aL 1V:L`J AM J;CORDING 3 PAGES $15.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTI11200.00 KARLEEN F. DE B CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA B EPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC6 ~~ . Richard W. Itadke, )squire Barnett, Bolt, Kirkwood, Long & McBride, P.A. 601 Bayshore Boulevard, Suite 700 Tampa, Florida 33606 The following information is provided pursuant to Section 689,02(2) F.S.: Property Appraiser's parcel ID ntuvber: !5129/151549501021/0010 and IS/29/15/54450/026/OOIO Federal Tax ID Numbcr of the Grantee: SPr;C'TAT, WARRANTY DFFif I_.1~~ I;I~{~ t~ ri 411U~ ' i.. . ORIGINAL THIS IIVDENTURE nnade this ~ day of h'~ cI rG h , 2UU4, between RANDOLPH M. LAOS, AS CURATOR OF THE ESTATE OF FOREST DEAN ("Crtantor'~, whose post office address is cJo London Bates, Esquire, Gassman, Bates & Associates, P.A., 1245 Court Street, Suite 102, Clearwater, Florida 33756, and RELIGIOUS COMMUNTI'Y SERVICES, INC., a Florida not foz profit corporation ("Grantee"), whose post office address is 1855 Highland Avenue South, Clearwater, Florida 33756. Y~ITL~IES~ET.H: That Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/I 00 DOTS ARS ($1 U.UU), and other goad and valuable considerations to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to Gran#ee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, an undivided 21922°lo interest in the following described laud {the "Property") located in Pinellas County, Florida, to-wit: LANDS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, MADE A PART HEREOJ?, AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE HEREIN. And Grantor hereby covenants with Grantee that, except as herein noted, as of the date of this Deed, the title to the Property is free from all encumbrances made by Grantor, and Grantor will warrant and defend the title to the Property against the lawful claims and demands of all persons and entities claiming by, through, or under Grantor, but against none other. Wherever used herein and wherever the context so admits or requires, the terms Grantor and Grantee shall include the singular and the plural; the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals; and the successors and assigns of corporations and partnerships. J 1~.. ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this Special Warranty Deed to be duly executed and delivered in its name on the aforesaid date. WITNESSES: l~/IYI +~ Prin-_-t-!~ Name: lp,i/ M'1 ~~~ ~C+P~~, ~ Print ~ Narne: ~lb..~4.t1q As to Grantor V STATE OF ~.,Q.e~•..~.... COUNTY OF ~~.K.~~,, UOLPH OS, AS CURATOR OF ESTATE ,FOREST DEAN "Grantor" The foregoing instnunent was acknowledged before me this ~_ day of March, 2(}04, by R.ANDOLPH M. LOOS, AS CURATOR OF THE ESTATE OF FOREST DEAN, on behalf of thc Estate, who is persy orally Imown to me or has produced as identification. ~/~'Lt'y-u~~~--'' NotaryPu lic, Sfateuof ~...Za~,~.~~a~.._. Print or stamp name: ~1t~rzy ~ g,eo~v,~/ My commission expires: ~ -/3 _y~- __ My serial number is:~DD ~o y/ 78 G:\Y A T\YAT\RH\AMSOUTH-MCWftORTER\3PECIAL WARRANTY DEED-DfiAN.DOC (2) ~w11i: dl1~ w~~~~~ ~,,,,,~.ton s nooo~tn ORIGINI~~ - - - -•--"... iJY JV rv c.y ~. .~ ORIGWAL EXIIIBIT "A„ [Legal Description] All of Block 26, MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; LESS AND EXCEPT the South 200 feet of the East 154 feet thereof; and ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT a triangle in the Northeast corner thereof described as: Begin at a point on the Easterly boundary of said Block 26, 10 feet South of the Northeasterly corner of said Block 26, and run thence North 14 feet to said Northeasterly corner; run thence West 11 feet along the Northerly line of said Block 26; run thence Southeasterly to the Point of Beginning. AND All of Block 21, MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; LESS AND EXCEPT Lots 4 and 5 thereof. AND That portion of vacated or closed Pine Street between Block 21 and Block 26 of Magnolia Park Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat $ook 3, Page 43, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, as described in Ordinance No. 2467-81 of the City of Clearwater, Florida recorded in Official Records Book 5258, Page 2041, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 1. Taxes and assessments for the year 2004 and subsequent years. 2. Drainage and utility easernent in favor of the City of Clearwater, Florida as set forth in Ordinance No. 2467-8I of the City of Clearwater, Florida recorded in Official Records Book 5258, Page 2441, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 3. Any right, title acrd interest of the Tampa and Gulf Coast Railroad Company or Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company (now CSX Trarrsportation Company} by virtue of that certain spur track located across portions of subject land as depicted orr drawing in Ordinance No. 2467-81 recorded in Official- Records Book 5258, Page 2041, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA - PINELLAS COUNTY f WR `~,~r r ~ • - ~D i hereby certify that the foregoing is a true r c ..• • l *;' '•; *~~ /ro: :<J copy as the same appears among the files and records I this court. ,.- T1119~of f (~ 20 Q $ '~ " 4: .,~, ~ {3) ~ r •• ~ h;9s~.... ~ qs= K NK Ng U Clerk of Circuit Cou ~,,~ Deputy Clerk ~`~~ NOTICE OF AD VALORE1vi TAXES & NON-AD VAC, ~ ~, ~ l e~ '~ PLEASE DETACH AND KEEP FOR YOUR RECORDS ~~ r= ~;.,~ . ~ r , ... ~',S '1, , ~ ~~ SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ~ •~. PIN ~,~,¢~ CC{~t1t~TY TAX COLLECTOR 2004 R ~j~J EAL ESTATE TAX NOTICE/RECEIPT FOR PINE AS~~tUt4T~ RE 64933-5 PAY !N U.S. FUNDS TO DIANE NELSON, TAX COLLECTOR • P.O. BOX 10832 • CLEARWATER, FL 33757-882 • X727) 562-3262 If NOV. 30 DEC. 31 JAN. 3 ~` MAR. 31 POSTMARKED 12,458.60 12,588.38 12,718.15 12,$47.93^Y 12 977 71 , . BY: a ~ ~` - ® ~ ®° ff ' ' TAXiN AUTHORITY tbtiLLAGE RATE TAX S L IED CW 22.9694 COUNTY-AGGREGATE 6.8010 3,842.56 i ~ ~ s ~ ' SCHOOL-STATE LAW 5,5040 3,109.75 O 565,000 0 565,000 SCHOOL-LOCAL 8D. 2.6180 1 479 1 7 `! . U CITY 5.7530 3,250.45 }> ~ ~ SW FLA WTR MGMT. .4220 238.43 WPARCEL N0: 15/29/15154450/026/0010 PINELLAS ANCLOTE 4000 226 Q ~ . .00 SiTE ADDR: 700 DRUID RD PI N. CO.PLN.CNCL. .0220 12.43 Q. rri ~ QRELIGIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES JUV. WELFARE BD. .8117 458.61 SUNCST. TR.AUTH. 6377 360 Z ~ . INC .30 ~ 1855 HIGHLAND AVE S (,LtARWAT'tK fL 33755-1750 .. ,... L1ieYY~~~`Wis.'?i'W.3'C~.%~,`,?~.~,{:~a-, LEVYING AUTHGRITY RATE AMOU~dT , ~- `~ ® ~vviath ~ ~Atat . ~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ °,~ ~~~ ~R~ SEQ. # :101499 03J15/04 1:45 FAX 727410 +StCeceliaChurch ~ [~j41 ORIGIN~+ s~ _ ~ ~~ Septembcr 17, 2001 Mr. Rcaa Dictarsan, Exec;uuve Director Religious Community Services 1855 Highland Avenue South Clearwater, Florida 3375G Dear Mr. Y?ickntan, St_ Cecelia Catholic Church would be agreeable to allowing the Food Pantry ofReligious Community Services to use the church parking lot on weekdays. Here are the numbers that the City of Clearwater requested: Seating Capacity of the Church: - 860 Number of Parking Spaces: - 271 With every best wish, I am Sincereky yours, Monsignor Aidett Foynes Pastor • • ~~ ~~~° IVIYERS & ASSOCIATES ~~ {`~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ARCHITECTURE, AIA, P.A. AA-0003461 ~~~~, ~~ ~ i ~~, May 25, 2005 City of Clearwater Planning Department Design Review Committee RE: RCS Food Bank 700 Druid Doad To Whom it May Concern - Stormwater Narrative: The existing site of the above referenced project drains to Myrtle Avenue to the east and Druid road to the south. We do not plan to change that pattern. Site improvements will include removing some of the existing impervious areas to create additional green areas with landscaping. Curbs will be included as shown. The existing deteriorated ashalt paving will be overlaid with new asphalt paving without changing the existing drainage. Sincerely, Jay F. yers, I Phe~r7~: '7~"1--~~~-°~1C;~C7 ~~x: °7'7-~--X1~r`. --mii: m~ , ,,ch~ix.net~c~m.ccarr~ • ORIGINAL ~ ~~ t Planning Department C~e~~ate~ CleaSrwaterM lon'da 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION induding 1) collated, 2}stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE ~ CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: ~` NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS] ~ ~ ~ D LU~~ FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 2J02/2004) --PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Rel i qi nuG ~'sammunit~Services~ inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 5O3 Ss~??th MT~K AVe ClearWat:er~ FL 337R6 PHONE NUMBER: 727-584-T~28 FAX NUMBER: 727-587-7747 PROPERTYOWNER(S}: Re11glOUS Community Services,, Inc_ (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signatures} on page 6) AGENT NAME: Jay Miters, Arr-h iteCt MAILING ADDRESS: 9170 Oakhurst Rd, Seminole FL 33776 PHONE NUMBER: 727-595-7100 FAX NUMBER: 727-595-7138 CELL NUMBER: 727-43Q~31 32 E-MAIL ADDRESS: mvrrc~rrh(~i x natr"C1I11 ~"'GUm B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: R('S Fnnr"7 Rank 7~O L1rL~id R6~ ->;'1c~~r1n7~~P~--t .F~, ~~']~i.~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: 1 .O 6 4 acre s (acres, square feet} PROPOSEDUSE(S)ANDSIZE(S}: Food Bank- serial services (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See attached request Page 1 of 6 -Flexible Development Application- City of Clearwater ae~a~-~ 1 {if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal} • [JRIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED} SITE PLAN? YES NO _~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) ATTACHED D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The building is existing and exter; nr w; 1 1 hP-.l.mp~ov~d= ____..__..____ iarant _. landscaping design wi 1 1 he c,nnrr3i n~tad with nthar ar~ ~ ~~~E'-rti es 2. , - The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The development and renovations will improve the area that the building is located. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. No There is no activity ass[~n; at.Qr7 w; th ; s progre.m t11Rt will affect the neighborhood. The orimary function of the business is to distribute food to needy households. 4. The pr posed development is designed to minimize traffic con estion. We c~o not expect additional traffic to be generated,. no more than what the Food Bank is already generating 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed development is currently in scale with other ware- house type buildings in the area The modifications we are proposing will be more in line with the City's requirements. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The exterior design will improve the visual of the building by removing the warehouse tyke look of the bud ding There are no unusual noises or smells associated with this facility ^ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable} -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. ThA nnl v riA~~~~t-i8~}g 4Je are as>r~ng fer ~6 SPthar`k fnr park; ng anti the Ong--o-r~ site. Additional parking is available across the Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0*IGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or nt I ~ fi ct will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.} See attached Properly a~~rasal 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Proposed property for use is social services and is permitted to operate as such according to city code 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Zoning for the proposed d v 1 onment- i C rnmmPr~i a 1 R„Ci nPCCPC ; n i-hP r s The Food Bank program i S c-ompat-i ahl P ar•r•nrr~i na i-n f-hP ~nni nn fnr the 5. area Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not othenuise available in the City of Clearwater. ~ppri Rank 1 nnkA~ ~e~tP~-al~ears f®r an area to operate that would m ~ . _ not create more ha~h_~p nn nt,r arg~_~ox,ulation With land being at a premium in this grea this location-was ab~r nnl~r alternative 6. t The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. mhP r„rrPnt hui~ r~i nc7 i s-a--hl.u-e warPho~,~P t-yne buildi nc~. The proposed rPnn~ra~-'nnc will come more in line with the scale and type of b „~1 d; pc~G i n t-hP area '1'hP exterior of the buildinq will be similiar 7. i~1 color and landsC~appiirilcCtt w1~.11, often the lopk of the area. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redeveldpment proiec creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. gn wi 1 1 i ncl ~,~lP lapdsr~a~ing t.~1cl_t~.?i 1 1 hP nn ~arahl P t-n i-hP The de s j . _ _ Sl,rrnl,n ; nrr area The PSt t'Pr~_(}f f- ~ ~~~~~.~~'j (3 W~~~ ~~'}6"`~u~g a f~PC; CTn ~r r-,n t-hP C; (~P and far-ar~P nn t-hP fron that Will include a m ,r~l f-y~L_}2a i n_ t_,' nc 8. 7 Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. rP(~,iPCt-Pf~ i c iri ~ng~~~~ to mark; nrr~~n~ t.~j.P amRltnt fl of i hi l ; i-c ThP n l ~~ n z at St Ceceila's church across th_ C r_ 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. G~~~f =nom vn1 t~ntPPrG a 1 1 „t-; ~ ; ~P t-hP d~~c~nated parking spaces ~] j ~ ~ „ , ~ alloted to the Food Ban Program on si P and a rotes the CfYPPf- at S Ceceila's Church. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. The ~roposPd develo>JmPnt i S not 1 nc~afiPd i n fhP r~nwntnwn riPV_._el n~ mant araa, Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • ORIGINAL c. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Crit Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that irn addition or modification_of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem to this requirement. tt~,~~ ~~yy If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ~~Ey ~ ~ L~ ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; _ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; _ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. - Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. O COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall e provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the Gity Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; O TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed} -please design around the existing trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; O PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided}; ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ All dimensions; _ North arrow; _ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _ Location map; _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; _ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; . ,~ _ All required setbacks; Orr4A - All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _ Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater L _ _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and Iifi stations, gas and water lines; - Ail parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of aIi required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of ail solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ~~~, ~ ~ ~; O SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _ Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for ail nonresidential uses. ^ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) and color rendering if possible; ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; _ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; _ Location of ail earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; - Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); - Streets and drives (dimensioned}; _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned}; _ Structural overhangs; _ Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of ail trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN: _ Aii existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; - Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _ Sight visibility triangles; - Delineation and dimensions of ail parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; _ Proposed and required parking spaces; _ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or Zabel} indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; _ Location, size, and quantities of ail existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; _ Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfiiling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; _ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); _ Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %Z X 11) (color rendering if possible); O IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. ~y Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater BUDDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-.W~2$)i/ t' "' ®`"`° Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; O REDUCED pUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/Z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. Ii - .~ (~ "7 ~ l J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide j~hotographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). d Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • WiII generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting' held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway le sand each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. a~ra'+ ~ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.' If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application. are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property cri in this application. ature of property ov~vner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS / Sw n to and subscribed before me this rC~_~, day of A.D. 20~ to me and/or by 1tCvr~,__.yvho is person known has produced i r as identification. ;,~ ~( or«,. c M,y ary public, -- • • i1Ay Corrwrriuion D03tiZ7i3 My commission e pires~ ~ ~,1~ OBSOLETE Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • r~r r wr+v ~ ~ ~ v r-v ~ nvrt~c~ r+vc~• ~ . Religious Community Services, Inc ORIGINAL 1. That (I amJwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) T ., ~-..r..~.r rl. r~r.~,-, +-, i. r, ,.. .~, v~-.-.rte r.r loo>»~Fi f'i n~f- ldina to be more in line with surrounding area. 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and {does/do) appoint: Jay Myers AIA as (his/their) agent{s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Cleawater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; Page 6 of 6 -Flexible Development Application- City of Clearwater 05SOLETE 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1lwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ~. .._~ Property Owner •~" • My C,omn~lon OD~62'1~3 Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on ~~~ day of this ~ (~(~ personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. ... Notary Public ~ MY Commission Expires: JUN 0 ~ 2005 S:IPlanning DepartmentiApplication formsldevelopment reviewlflexible development application 2003.doc OBSOLE~'~ Page 7 of 6 -Flexible Development Application- City of Clearwater RCS Programs: 700 Druid Road, West • Clearwater, FL 33756 Grace House Telephone (727) 443-4031 • Fax (727) 443-6874 The Haven rpantry@tampabay.rr.com Stepping Stone RCS Thrift Store RCS Food Bank June 6, 2005 City Of Clearwater4 ~ ~ ~ ~ Planning and Development Services Municipal Services Building Re: Case Summary FLD2005-OSO406 700 Druid Road Religious Community Services Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing sociaVpublic service agency with from 100 feet to S8 feet (along Myrtle Avenue) , a reduction to the front (South along Druid Road) set back from 2S feet to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Avenue) set back from 2S feet tol S feet (to existing pavement),a reduction to the side {east) set back from 10 feet to 0 (zero) feet (to existing pavement} and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 0 (zero) feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Road (south) from 10 feet to S feet {to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the East from S feet to 0(zero) feet {to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the West from 5 feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to7.4 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. ~Y~es ~O6y a ~ ~ tt ~;~~ ~ 1( + • ~,, 'OZORtDt' "5~,,,:..fi V Ew y D.y" United Wey~ RCS Programs: Grace House The Haven Stepping Stone RCS Thrift Store RCS Food Bank 700 Druid Road, West • Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone (727) 443-4031 • Fax (727) 443-6874 rpantry C~ tampabay. rr.com ORIGINAL ~~~ ~) ~, E , ~ _1 June 6, 2005 City of Clearwater Planning Department RE: FLD2005-050406- 700 Druid Road Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Letter of incompleteness # 7 In the vicinity of the location of the RCS Food Bank there are several businesses that range from Doctor's offices, Funeral Homes and Churches to warehousing and manufacturing of goods. The nearest social service agency is located at 1100 Cleveland Street. Thus, there are no other social service providers within 1,500 feet of the RCS Food Bank. Jamia Austin Director ~, ~ ~ ~4Vpfi OOG 4 'F ~g:~.t}' ~.a 'OZORNt' "Sa.,:..5 Ya. Ew~.y D~.y" Y~~ United 1Nay 06/05/2005 12:40 FA% 7275957138 MYERS AND ASSO 0 Planning and Development Services ~~ 100 South Myrtle Avenue } a ~~ Clearwater, Florida 33758 Telephone: 727-562-1{587 U Fax:727-582-4576 O SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED A~~TeR»Fn APPLlCATKNV O 8U8MIT 1 COPY ~ THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION indudMg folded siM plan CaMPRE~IENSPVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (>:e+~a sn9noait D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 41001) APPLICANT NAME: Re 11 Ql OU MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(Sy: Re 1 i ~ (Must M AGENT NAME: (CorKeCt Person) MAl1.1NG ADDRESS: ~~~ZQ_~ 5 Community Services Food Bank 700 Druid Road Clearwater FL 33756 401 FAXNUMeER: 727-443-6874 pious Communit Services, Inc. dude ALL. owtlera) j,3~t~j~c~ r s A T A .,. -- i_khurst Rd Suite 3 B seminole FL 33776 PHONE NUMBER: 727-595-7100 FAX NUMBER: 727-595-7138 The landscaping n3quircments of Article 3 Division 1Z may be waived or mod~ed as a part of a Leval One or Lever Two Approval. as the case may tar, E the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplem®ntary information in addition to the information provided on this worksheet; 1. Architectural Theme. a. The Landscaping in a Comprehensive landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the palt;ei proposed for the development- The landsca in that is lanned is intended to soften the impact of the existin buildin which as virtuallay no landscaping. Thi is bein done alon with additional fenestrations and architect- g h,,; ~ r7i ng `~~ ~' C>~E #: DATE RECEIVED: Rf;CE1VED BY (stett InlOais); ATLAS PAGE ~; 20NIN0 DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: f~005 20NING 8 LANG USE GLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH- / SOUTH' _,_~ / WEST: _ / EAST: /__~ .. ~ 4 06/05/2005 12:40 FAX 7275957138 MYERS AND ASSO 11006 OR • b. The design, character, location andJor materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. There is existing parking lot lighting on the site for_security. There is no lan e li htin ro osed 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The landscape deisgn is intended to coordinate with the proposed rn~P~t to t-hP TSnrth wi t-h the ))GP c)f the same isyi~e of i~lant r ert Alon the West side of this deVPlp~m~,nt-,~` lan o uvse a buffer of trees and the railroad track and the trail. I; ~. ~,, ~' ?) ~. ~ r ~..:, :~ ~ ~~ .. 06/05/2005 12:40 FAX 7275957138 14YERS AND ASSO ,,~ (~j007 4. ' Property Values. The iand~e treatment proposed in the Comprehensi~Candscape Program will have beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The esisting site has virtually no landscaping we in- _t'Pnc-~ to rPmnvP Pxi Gti ng pavPmPnf a~pl ant a~ i of the area the, . where the pavement has been removed-the landscaping will coordinate wi t-h t-hc__noi nhhnrc ~~ ~-ho TT~r~,~.---Ifl~~c~LSGI. ,~l an f'n GCYPPn l n ]~1-~-.__ ~tii.pmeni- anc~ (j,~~,Gt-Prc w; t-h t-he Same ~x,1.-~of PVC fencing that is . used at the ~r,~ctors off;ce to the east of the site This should add further unifinat-inn to t-hP cite area_ 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed !n the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. We plan to plant trees and hedcte material along the west side of the property and along the ex,jGfi~,g Pinellas,Trail Please return checklist for review and verification. 6. That (tMre), the underaigaed authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is tr ~"' t)iark G May ~ 1 ® -/ ~ ~ ' ~M Comndssion ODSti2'ft;3 Propeety Owner '~ °--- ExpMw ,IWy tt. 9006 Property Owner COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLO~AA, Bsfore ma the undersigned, art officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, (.,~°~~~` day of // ~! on this Lt,~ ~{,~ ~~ personally appeared who having been first duly sworn j/ Deposes end says that he/she fully understands the contersts of the affidavit that he/ahe signed. My Commlaslon Expires' '"f ~ ~ ~ ~ -~,~ ~ ~ r\ 7~~-~t/i~- ~C ~ ~,~ -'~~ ~(~} NOtery,P~+b1iC i ~.J S: appUeetion formstdevetopmeM reviewJcattprehensive landscape program application.doc •~.~ ~'"? '1 ~ "= ~.r Irv `~ Ira y,.® ~', ,~ { i ~ 7 ,~<~ ,-~ ~ ,Q ~ ~ ~ i~ 1 ~ p G ~'.+ye 3 of :i • • FLD2005-05046 700 DRUID RD Date Received: 05/26/2005 F~ELIGIOI.TS COMMUNITY SERVICES I ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 295B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED '"1 r1f~ r r ~1;= ~ ~ Luua CAW CoverSheet •.. Cha~ater ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2} stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) a R ~ ~ ~ ~ A L FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infi11 Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Religious COmmtltli t~ Services. Inc MAILING ADDRESS: 503 Sntith MLK ~lV~ Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE NUMBER: 727-584-3528 FAX NUMBER: 727-587-7747 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Reli_~i oLS C`ommt~ni t-y SPrv1cPS' Ins {Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: .lay F Myers, Architect MAILING ADDRESS: 9170 Oakhurst Rd. Seminole, Fl 33776 PHONE NUMBER: 727-595-71 00 FAX NUMBER: 727-595-71 38 CELL NUMBER: 727-430-4132 E-MAIL ADDRESS:~yersarch(~ix_n .om_ .om B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 700 Druid Rd East Clearwater, FI 3375ti LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Survey _ (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 1 S-?9-1 5=.5_44ri0-nth-0010 c-~-a~- PARCE(_ SIZE: _~~f > ~ ~O' '~~ ~ ~ ' ~ Q ~ T /TG~C~ e e n n rtetrt~~ (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S)AND SIZE(S): FOOd Bank-Social Servcice - .. (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)'`' - DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): RPnnv~tlAri c~-f ~x,a-S~-3.Xig--}ai~I~61~t'lg Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Additional site area• additional arkin CASE #: ~ _ _ _ _ I DATE RECEIVED: _ __ _ RECEIVED BY (staff initials) ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A FREVIOUSLY"APfRCNED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO _~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) ATTACHED D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (6} GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The building is existing and exter; or w; 1 1 hP__~,~p~owe.di-. ___~~_.::_~__ landscape ng deGign will hP cnor~~ na-t..e~ with~thPr ~~1 al"!PTI ~' .v ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~5 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The development and renovations will improve the area that the building is located. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. No There i G no aCteVetz assnri atPr9 wi th t}11S nrnr~ram fihat- wi l1, affect the neighborhood The primary function of the business es to distribute food to needy households. 4. The pr posed development is designed to minimize traffic con estion. We c~o not ex ect additional traffic to be generated, no more than what the Food Bank is already generatinc~_ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed development is currentl.~r in scale with other ware- house type buildings in the ar a The modifications we are proposing will be more in line with the City's requirements. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The ex rior d S;gn will improve the visual of the building by removing the warehouse tkpe look of the build;ng_ There are no unusual noises or smells associated with this facil;ty ^ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. a nnl r 6~'vi~+i.~F}g T~72 are asi4er3g ~6~' ~6 GPt-hawk fnr nar_ lci nc~ ant3 fihP n„r,t of nar>ti-nom-,site Additional parking is available across the Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See attached Property ap.~rasal 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Proposed property for use is social services and is permitted to operate as such according to city code 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Zoning for the proposed devel opmPnt ;S r.nmmPrrial R17Cl nPCCPa ;n the s at; ahl P acsnrs~inTt.t~-thP inn; n~ fnr f-hc The Food Bank program ; s rnmn r area 5. Suitable saes for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. m.h.~_.Eppr~ Rank 1 nnkPr~ ~A~~gral~ears )<or aYy area to operate that would not create more hardship~,n of targc,t ~pLlat;on With land beinq at a premium in this aroma this-l.ocat-i-on was-our-canl~ alternat; vP 6. , The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ilrrpnt hui~ d?~ ; G a hl.u.~ w~rPhollGe type building. The proposed Thy c .. rg„n~,a;-1o~s will come more in line with the scale and type of bL;ld;ngS ;n th a a The xterior of the building will be similiar 7. i11 color and landsCappil1l1qq w1111. of en the logk of the area. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill r~devel6pment protect crea~es a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. mha lac; gr, wi 1 1 i nr~l ilC3P 1 anr3craT ; nTthat_saill-rJe ~.rzmpara~h~ P to--thA Sllrrnllnr3i na arPa The e~zterior-n-f the ~iuils~inc~-will inelu~ie a ~PCi~n that will include a mural ty~E? nay nf'l nc7 nn t-hP Gi r7P and farar~P nn t-hP frori 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. j- ~~}~ the amni~nt Y; h; 1 ; +-ir rPr~iPCtpd is iri ret}~rd~ tea- *~~rkl3lt Thy onl ~fl= ~ r _ ~ . ?r~tinc To Knee of . p }- at St Ceceila's church across the Gtreet_ 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. staff and vnl tintQPrs all li_t> > ~ ~e the designated parking spaces Cli n ~ , alloted to the Food Bank Program on G; and a_roGS th RtYPPt at St_ Ceceila's Church. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. The croposed develonmPn i G not- 1 neat-Pd ; n the t3nwnt-nwn ~PVPI nnmPnt area , ~ x -~ ~, ~. ~.____ c~ ~ e _ ~~ ca.uv Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005-'Gityof Clearwater • J~` ~c. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. Ail applications that irn addition or modification. of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem~ to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ~'""y ("'~ ~ ~ ! ~ A ! ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: IV('{-~` j( /J,, L _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; - All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; _ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. _ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall e provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F/. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) O SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, ~ciuding drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - p/ease design around the existing trees; ~~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; C r~ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to E~ the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in ',~~' accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the ~~~ parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ~~ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided}; COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A} North arrow, ~~ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet}, and date prepared; ~;~ ~ j ~~~ Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of ail EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of ail PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, e ~ ~,~ ;~A ! ,,._._ ,,,,~ Location of all public and private easements; ~•* , :~ + ~, Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; ~' ~ ~`a' ~ ~=-s ^~ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infili Application 2005- City of Clearwater w ~~ ~ ~ Q Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manho s n I ti s and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, load~in _area~s and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatchm-- g~-oi"a'lfrequired parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index#701}; Location of all landscape material; ~. Location of ail onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. O/ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabular form: d Land area in square feet and acres; r Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. trl REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11) and color rendering if possible; FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: ~~ `~ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; t' \\\~~- Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ~A~ ~ ~ Z~~S _ All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; _ Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) O~ tANDSCAPE PLAN: `~ All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; ~~ xisting trees on-site and iy~me~di_ately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on ~S required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol ar label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; location, size, and quantities of ail existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfiliing, mulching and protective measures; 4 Interior landscaping areas hatched andlor shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; ~^ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); 1~ Irrigation notes. ® REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %Z X 11) (color rendering if possible); ~~ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. ~.,~ i^° ~ , r '- ~ ~~ Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infiil Application 2005- City of Clearwater " ~ I t 1., BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; Ya REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/a X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS i Section 3-1806) ,/^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. 1^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). d Reduced signage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ~ Ay rt ~ Za fy~ K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour andlor 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment andlor intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750} Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway le ~s~a,~nd each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ~~' +.L~L Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727} 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application. are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. _._.,,..._---•-------.,~ ature of property owl r or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS SwoQrn to and subscribed before me this day of ,~'~tc:~,- A.D. 20~ to me and/or by who is person known has produced _. ~ as identifica~'on. +:/ Notary public, ~,d My commission expires: ~ ~ j ~?C~ ~ Ij ~~~ r~ r Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater .... ~ ~~ AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Re ~~ (Names of all property owners on deed -please PRIN full names) 1. That (1 am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): RCS Food Bank located at 700 Dru'd Road Clearwater FL 33756 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) ~1i Seri ~r nova ions; PxtPri nr hPat~i f i cai-i nn 1-n i ncl nrle 1 and~c~a~L ing and redisigning of warehouse metal building to be more in line with surrounding area. 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (doesldo) appoint: ~ ~ ~ M ~I e' f as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. `~.~~~ ~ t y 4~ ~, Property Owner ~ _ """" ~ CONTE ,~„ ~ ,.. ~ ppp0~3704 Property Owner r E _ J ` enru (>~?~~"~~' Property Owner t ~ ~v. ~ F~°,°~,',Pa...~Assn, •,, ~ _ Property Owner „ . STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE<.LAS ~ day of Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ~~ ~ persy ovally appeared who having been first duly sworn De es and says that he/etre fully understands the contents of the affidavit that helege signed. ~~~~~ J~ 'l ,C' p Notary Public ~ My Commission Expires: g °jj e~ ~ d c~ S:\Ptanning Department\Application Forms\devetopment review\flexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc ~' ~ ~ 2005 Page 7 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater tb/14!t5 'S4450/0~6 /OOtO C~ ~ G) ~~ ~' ?' ~~ m ~~ ~~-~.~ -;~~ ~_~: ~i i c ri,wrv SGALE 1" = 80'-O" K/ ~_1 OF RENOVATION OF BUILDING FOR RG5 FOOD B?~NK ~~ & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE AIA PA 9170 OAKHURST ROAD SUITE 3B SEMINOLE, FLORIDA JAY F. MYERS 4959 A-2B -100 DRUID RD, GLEARWATER, FLORIDA 727 - 595 - 7100 FAX 727 - 595 - 7138 myersarch@ix.netcom.com # AA -0003461 T~ N OO N O r Z ~ _ `'~~. _ ~, ~ V I DTI J .+ G Y...-: 1 E WDN LP RAILROAD STOP/GO SIGNAL RR X-ING GATE Qh " I 1 4 I ' 51 I I I i ~~ i ~ I ~ ~ v I e i~ ~ I ~6" CONG GllRB I I I I 1~ ~ I 4' WHITE PJG FENCE Vi.'11'E we FENCE I EN9tATGR I I 1VV.V' - i I I I I I I I I I I zl I ~~ I METAL COMMERCIAL ~I BUILDING ON I CONCRETE SLAB ~I #--oo ?I I I I I I I 10 ~ q e rr REMOVE PODOGARPUS I ~~D GARBAGE PALM I I I REMOVE PODOGAR~ 1 ~" , 17-0' EXISTMG OAK 1{ I !STRAIGHTEN) b" GONG GUR6 ~ F1 15 81 1 1 ~ F~ ~ 1 1 I8 I I I :ONG FILLED ...~.... .. ..........:........... s . ~ :~::::: PIPE ........ .. ... ................. _~ ...... .... e ...... I I ~... - UNIT I I - ... 1 b' PVG FI=TIGE '~ 19.4 ~I (EXi5TN6) 51GHT TRIANGLE I I I I I ~-~--`~---------r---------- I- I I ~ I I _--_______ I I ~ I I I I I I I I a, I I I I I I I I ~ I I I zl ! J ~PP ~ ~I ~ I I ~I I ~ of I I; I I I I I I I ~ I I I W 6 n m I - - I ~ I I I $ ~F ~ I i z I I k 1a.b'-- I I ::I: ~ I I '~~ ~ ~ U Z I I >~> ~~°,~ ~ LL I I I I I LAND6GAPE P I N ~ I SGa e: 1' = 40 - z ~GONGRETE CURB z - - 51GHT TRIANGLE iDS ) 3Fi-- ~/ ~) 05/25/05 111 'osE~ I Q ~ u.f ~~ TRIANG4E I~ r6 r ~4 ~ Q ? m 0 s V Q FIR-1/2" MO I.D.) I N r ~~ `~ ° a r a n R e ~~ o x a ~ ~' a~ a °z d ~ e M ~ r pG ~ a a q '^ O ~ s d u. U N O ~ ~! ° ~; a z ~~~ pppm z4 ~ Q FZ 0. a~`~g J n • W Cn ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~P~ `sG ~~i,~ A Q ~~~ _ yt~. O ~^` V n "f`I ~ i 1 ~ y~~ i ~ ~ C'.~~ @~ytt~ 0 ~~ Fi'17 1T1 /may ~ ~°'" M~L1__ O r rn PANTED L16HT BLUE WHITE PAINTED PAINTED LIbHT BLUE MEDNIM BLUE STUGGO PANELS SOUTH ELEVATION Scale: 1/8" = t'-0" NEW WINDOWS FLOOR SLAB ~_2~ OF RENOVATION OF BUILDING FOR RG5 FOOD BANK Njy~$ & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE AIA PA 9170 OAKHURST ROAD SUITE 3B SEMINOLE, FLORIDA JAY F. MYERS 4959 A-2B 100 DRUID RD, GLEARWATER, FLORIDA 727 - 595 - 7100 FAX 727 - 595 - 7138 mycrsarch@ix.netcom.com # AA -0003461 ROOF HEIGHT /2" 2 SLAB MEAN ROOF HEIGHT MEZ7I~NINE ..-~0,-8-, - - • a O n N O r---~ NORTH ELEVATION Scale: t/8" = t'-0" MAY 2 0 2005 PLANo `~6~~ ~~~~~~~f€NT C9~"Y ~~ C~~~~~I~~~~~ ' ~ ~~ - - - r ~~ i i ~, PPJNTED LIGHT BLUE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT MEZZANINE FLOOR 5LAB ~Q~ME_AN ROOF HEIGHT MEZZANINE .._..-~ - - - - 0 _S ~ FLOOR SLAB ~O'-0.- - - PAINTEp LIGHT GLUE EAST ELEVATION Scale: t/8" = 1'-0" ~t-2B OF RENOVATION OF BUILDING FOR RG5 FOOD BANK SRS & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE AIA PA 9170 OAKHURST ROAD SUITE 3B SEMINOLE, FLORIDA JAY F. MYERS 4959 A-2B 'f00 DRUID RD, GLEARWATER, FLORIDA 727 - 595 - 7100 FAX 727 - 595 - 7138 myersarch@ix.netcom.com # AA -0003461 if 1 O to N N O O V ' • s MYERS & ASSOCIATES ARCH-TECTURE, AIA, P.A. AA-0003461 9170 Oakhurst Rd., Suite 3B Seminole, Florida 3377b ORIGINAL May 25, 2005 City of Clearwater Planning Department Design Review Committee RE: RCS Food Bank 700 Druid Doad To Whom it May Concern - Stormwater Narrative: The existing site of the above referenced project drains to Myrtle Avenue to the east and Druid road to the south. We do not plan to change that pattern. Site improvements will include removing some of the existing impervious areas to create additional green areas with landscaping. Curbs will be included as shown. The existing deteriorated ashalt paving will be overlaid with new asphalt paving without changing the existing drainage. Sincerely, Jay F. yers, I MAY 2 6 2005 ~ - - Phone: '12'7-595-?100 Fax: '12'1-595-'7138 E-m~ii: myer~arGhc~ix.neti/om.com ~ ~ ~, I#: 2004106160 BK: 13430 2411, 03/12/2004 at 10:29 RECORDING 3 PAGES $15.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECT~I $11200.00 KARLEEN F. DE BIR, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC6 V T}11C IItAfi'f1tIlP.nf ~ 8iPlj An(j~j,Ti }n~ Richard W. Radke, Esquire Barnett, Bolt, Kirkwood, Long & McBride, P.A. 601 Bayshore Boulevard, Suite 700 Tampa, Florida 33606 the following information is provided pursuant to Section 689.02(2) F.S.: Property Appraiser's parcel ID number: 15I29/15/54450/021I0010 and 15I29I15I54450/026/0010 Federal Tax ID Number of the Grantee: S~ ~~ j; L r ` ) (j I~~ ~f 'i G~ ~ LI~U~ ii.~,~. ORIGINIII MAY 2 6 2005 THIS 1NDElti~TURE made this ~ day of ~ Q rG~ , 2004, between RANDOLPH M. LAOS, AS CURATOR OF THE ESTATE OF FOREST DEAN ("Grantor"}, whose post office address is c% London Bates, Esquire, Gassman, Bates & Associates, P.A., 1245 Court Street, Suite 102, Clearwater, Florida 33756, and RELIGIOUS CO1~Il~[tTNTI'Y SERVICES, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation ("Grantee', whose post ofFtce address is I S55 Highland Avenue South, Clearwater, Florida 3375b. 3~ITL~IES~ETH: That Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND N01100 DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and valuable considerations to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, an undivided 21.922% interest in the following described land (the "Property"} located in Pinellas County, Florida, to-wit: LANDS DESCRIBED IN E~~HIF3IT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, MADE A PART HEREOF, AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE HEREIN. And Grantor hereby covenants with Grantee that, except as herein noted, as of the date of this Deed, the title to the Property is free from all encumbrances made by Grantor, and Grantor will warrant and defend the title to the Property against the lawful claims and demands of all persons and entities claiming by, through, or under Grantor, but against none other. Wherever used herein and wherever the context so admits or requires, the terms Grantor and Gtmttee shall include the singular and the plural; the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals; and the successors and assigns of corporations and partnerships. OBSOLETE PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. RE~BK 13434 PG 2412 ORIGINAL IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this Special Wan-anty Deed to be duly executed and delivered in its name on the aforesaid date. Vi~[1'NESSES: t~I)YI ' Print Name: ,L~.~~L•~~.1~~~'e,rtt~y lp.{/ µ~ Print Name: Aj ~,~n (,' -•,n ~ q As to Grantor V STATE OF '.~~~<-- COUNTY OF _ p.~~~ llULYH L OS, AS CURATOR OF ESTATE FOREST DEAN "Grantor" SAY ~ s zoa~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of March, 2004, by RANDOLPH M. LOOS, AS CURATOR OF THE F,STATE OF FOREST DEAN, on behalf of the Estate, who is pers` orally known to me or has produced as identi&cation. Notary Pu lic, State of ~~.~c.~~~ Print or stamp name: /Yl,~2y t= ,g,ep~vi/ My commission expires: ~ •/3 -v~ My serial number is: ~D oo y/ 78 G:\Y A T\YAT\R8\AMSOtTTB-MCWHORTER\SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED-DEAN.DOC t2) "'!1 ~®~ ~ wr t~- ~ O~ s p0oo~1A PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. RE~BK 13430 PG 2413 . ORIGINAL EXHIBIT "A„ [Legal Description] All of Block 26, MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; LESS AND EXCEPT the South 200 feet of the East 150 £eet thereoF and ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT a triangle in the Northeast corner thereof described as: Begin at a point on the Easterly boundary of said Block 26, 10 feet South of the Northeasterly corner of said Block 26, and run thence North 10 feet to said Northeasterly comer; run thence West 11 feet along the Northerly line of said Block 26; run thence Southeasterly to the Point of Beginning. AND All of Block 21, MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded in Plat $ook 3, Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; LESS AND EXCEPT Lots 4 and 5 thereof. AND That portion of vacated or closed Pine Street between Block 21 and Block 26 of Magnolia Park Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, as described in Ordinance No. 2467-8t of the City of Clearwater, Florida recorded in Official Records Book 5258, Page 2041, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. l . Taxes and assessments for the year 2004 and subsequent years. 2. Drainage and utility easement in favor of the City of Clearwater, Florida as set forth in Ordinance No. 2467-81 of the City of Clearwater, Florida recorded in Official Records Book 5258, Page 2041, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 3. Any right, title and interest of the Tampa and Gulf Coast Railroad Company or Seaboard Coast Line Raikoad Company (now CSX Transportation Company) by virtue of that certain spur track located across portions of subject land as depicted on drawing in Ordinance No. 2467-81 recorded in Official- Records Book 5258, Page 2041, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. <.,. ~ V~+a!/ ~ Y..~ ^ irk SAY ~ ~ zoa5 STATE OF FLORIDA • PINELLAS COUNTY I ~;cuR ~ ~t '` •• ~Al r A i hereby certify that the foregoing is a true co h r •. ..•• c '* ~ • •'•; *ri i3 ~<~ py as t e same appears among the files and records f this court., ~ ~ ~ ~ s~-- This>~~f Lf A~2t ~ 2o Q (3) y~'•• :•4: ~ •' ° _~~ , ~ K NBURKE r~ q •••.•,,, ••F~ S ~ ~C~lerkof~CirouitCou Deputy Clerk NOTICE OF AD VALOREM TAXES & NON-AD VAL 4 PLEASE DETACH AND KEEP FOR YOUR RECORDS _ -~ SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS AD VALOREM TAX PINE CCj~)-~TY TAX COLLECTOR 2004 R N Z~~~ EAL ESTATE TAX NOTICE/RECEIPT FOR PINE AS ~~U~T~ RE 64933-5 PAY IN U.S. FUNDS TO DIANE NELSON, TAX COLLECTOR • P.O. BOX 10832 • CLEARWATER, FL 33757-882 • (727) 562-326 2 IF NOV. 30 DEC. 31 JAN. 3 . _." MAR. 31 POSTMARKED 12,458.60 12,588.38 12,718.16 12,847.93 12,977.71 BY ~ ~ ~ •' TAXING AUTHORITY MILEAGE RATE TAXES LEVIED CW 22.9694 COUNTY-AGGREGATE 6.8010 3,842.56 565 000 0 '` SCHOOL-STATE LAW 5.5040 3,109.76 O , 565,000 SCHOOL-LOCAL BD. 2.6180 1,479.17 y V CITY 5.7530 3,250.45 X :° tl wPARCEL N0: 15129/151544501026/0010 SW FLA WTR MGMT. .4220 238.43 PINELLAS ANCLOTE .4000 226 00 D m ; . aSITE ADDR: 700 DRUID RD . PI N. CO.PLN.CNCL. .0220 12.43 'D ° RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES I N C JUV. WELFARE BD. .8117 458.61 SUNCST. TR.AUTH. .6377 360.30 ~ '~ ~ „~ ~ 1855 HIGHLAND AVE S ~•~~' ~„ +`[ CLcARWHTEK FL 3375-1150 ~~~~ ,... s!iE a # ~.u4..~~ t ~, wx ~r ®®,®~AD YA~WM A~7~7 ~ ~~T~ LEVYING AUTHORITY RATE AMOUNT t p MaEh -~Aut ..~ X ~ No SfT® D Q a ~ GL AC AP ~ ~ ,~ ~ y m ~ x ~ _________!~__ _ ~DETAC9iF1ERE ~, SEQ.#:101499 09/15/04 1x:45 FAX 727810 +StCeceliaChurch ~ C~j01 septet 1~, 2001 Mr. RQa Dick~rfen, F.uecutive Director Religious Community Services 1855 Highland Avenue South Clearwater, Florida 33756 Dear Mr_ Diclanan, ORIGINAL St_ Cecrlia Catholic Church would be agreeable to allowing the Food Pantry of Religious Community Services to use the church parking lot on weekdays. Here are the members that the City of Clearwater requested: Seating Capaaty of the Church: - 860 Number of Parking Spaces: - 271 With every best wish, I am Sincerely yours, Monsignor Alden Foynes Pastor MlAY ~ ~ 20x5 .~ ~~ :~~ ,; ~~ ~. ' ~ .~ • • ORIGINAL FLD2005-05046 700 DRUID RD Date Received: 05/26/2005 F~]ELIGIOTS COMMUNITY SERVICES I ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG MAY ~ ~ ~~~ ATLAS PAGE: 2958 PLANNER OF RECOF:D: NOT ENTERED C~WCoverSheet ,. ~; w ~ 1 i I`T LE.AR~UATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (72~ 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 22, 2005 Mr. Jay Myers, AIA 9170 Oakhurst Road Seminole, Florida 33776 RE: Development Order -Case No. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Dear Mr. Myers: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On August 16, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing social/public service agency with a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 58 feet (along Myrtle Avenue), a reduction to the front (south along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to flue feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Road (south) from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.4 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: i. That a Minor Lot Adjustment and Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 2. That the maximum height of fencing within the front setback along South Myrtle Avenue be three feet and be indicated on revised plans prior to the issuance of any permits; FRhNK HIS3(3ARD, 1`JiAvOK Bll.l, JONSOti, ViCP,-MAYOR ~C1NN ~ORA~', CUU.~CtISfE)113F.R 110Y~ ~A~illa'ON, COUNCIL'v1I:h913ER -,~~ CnR~.EN A. PIiTERSL~, COUKCII; ~t E~113E[Z ~~EQUAI. EMPLOYT~hEN"l' AND l~FFIRMATNIi ACTIC7ti I:M1'LOYf?R~~ ~ ~ • • August 22, 2005 Myers -Page 2 3. That all freestanding and attached signage meet Code provisions and be consistent with the color of the building. The Comprehensive Sign Program may be utilized to provide additional signage in accordance with Code provisions, but freestanding signage shall be limited to six feet in height; 4. That prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be amended to indicate tree heights that comply with Code requirements; and S. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (August 16, 2006). Ali required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-S02.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 30, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ o~ vldepts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, ,,-, ,~ ti_.__-- .~~%~~~~ Michael Delk, AI Planning Director S: IPlnnning DepartrnentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)~/nnctive or Finished ApplicationslDruid 0700 RCS Food Bnnk (C) ?005 - ApprovedlDruid 0700 Development Order.doc • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 4:52 PM To: Jay Myers (E-mail) Subject: Staff Report for 8.16.05 CDB Jay - Attached is the Staff Report for 700 Druid Road for the 8.16.05 CDB. Wayne Druid 0700 Staff Report.doc • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 2:14 PM To: Jay Myers {E-mail) Subject: Draft 6.30.05 DRC comments for FLD2005-05046, 700 Druid Road Jay - Attached are the draft DRC comments for the 6.20.05 DRC meeting. Wayne draft 6.30.05 dre action agend... FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO• ~ a.~ __' _. FAX: -~ 9S - -7 ~ 3 ~ Phone: Sq J ~ ~ 1 D O FROM: ~. ~('~ Q,~~S Phone: S ~ z- - L~s`p 4.. DATE:_ ~lI ~ Z. a S __RE: {~''1_,D Z•f~ D ~ - 0 S D ~ (i 7 v-~v D r .r ; ~ 1Za . MESSAGE: ~('~, i V • 3 ~ • a S ~'D ~.~. :}-~" NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) ~- ~ • • Jun. 2? 2005 O2:26PM YOUR UOGO CityOfClearw~.ter-Plan Dept YOUR FAX hJO. ?2? 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 9595?138 Jun. 27 O2:24PM 01'49 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. TI-~I SECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR ' -' . FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-I-~P-FAX C435-7329). CITY OF CLE~RWATER ° ea~ater PLANNING DEPARTMENT '- MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM June 09, 2005 Jay Myers 9170 Oakhurst Road Seminole, F133776 RE: FLD2005-05046 -- 700 DRUID RD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Jay Myers The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-05046. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on June 30, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or W ayne. W ells@myc learwater. com. Sincerely yours, rte. M_ ~„~'~ Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - F'LU2005-05046 - 700 DRUID RD FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-465 TO: FAX: .) 9~- `7~.3~ Phone: .~ ~ s " ~ ~ ~ FROM: W ~ )~ Phone• 5(~ 2 - Yi t~-~'p_~_ DATE:_ ~ ~ 5 ~ 0 S RE: ~~ Z.A o s - t7 S 0 ~- to ~~ ~~~., ~--a~ MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Z- .- ~ Jun. 09 2005 11:02AM YOUR LOGO CityOfCle~rWater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTFER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95957138 Jun. 09 11:01AM 01'00 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, F'RE-SS 'MENU' #04. TE-Bd SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FDR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-PEEP-FAX 1435-7329). LL~ * CITY OF CLE~RWATER o ea~ater PLANNING DEPARTMENT ` '= MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVEI`1CTE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM June 02, 2005 Jay Meyers 9170 Oakhurst Road Seminole, F133776 RE: FLD2005-05046 -- 700 DRUID RD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Jay Meyers The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-05046. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. ~l . Revise the required setback along the north property line from 25 feet to 10 feet. ~2. Show the two required loading spaces (12-foot x 35-foot each; probably along the east side of the .building). ® Depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas. J4. It is assumed that the value of improvements or remodelling exceeds 25 percent of the value of the building, according to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. As such, parking and landscaping must be brought into full compliance with Code provisions. With only 3.8 percent of the vehicular use area being provided in interior landscaping, a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Road (south) (10 feet required; five feet provided), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line (10 feet required; five feet provided), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line (five feet required; zero feet provided) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east (adjacent to the existing office building) (five feet required; zero feet provided), need to submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application to request such, providing the justification for these reductions. ~ 5. Revise the request to include ail reductions listed by staff. Provide justification for all such reductions. ,16. Dimension on Sheet A-1 the width of the landscape buffers along Druid Road and along the north property line (all locations along the north property line due to jogs in the property line) and the width of all landscape islands. ~7. Need to indicate if the existing sociaUpublic service agency is located within 1,500 feet of another social/public service agency. If it is, then a deviation to be closer must be included with the request. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 4:00 pm on Monday, June 6, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or W ayne. W ells@myc learwater. com. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-0504b - 700 DRUID RD LL ~ CITY OF CLF~RWATER o ~a~ater PLANNING DEPARTMENT '= MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM June 02, 2005 Sincerely yours, ~} ~. ~Q~ Wa e ells vn Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-05046 - 700 DRUID RD '"""'~ C Y OF CLEARWAY ;~ , ,~-,:. ~; PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES :~,. ~ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING -~'~~'%""~"""~c~~~' 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 •,~t~~}~`~y,~~ PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 CASE SUMMARY FLD2005-05046 700 DRUID RD ~ ~J~~~ RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES I Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing social/public service agency with a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 58 feet (along Myrtle Avenue), a reduction to the front (south along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a ';r~mprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Road (south) from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to 3.8 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. PEOPLE Role: Owner/Property RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES I 1855 HIGHLAND AVE S CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE: No Phone FAX: No Fax Other Wither ~. ~. , FEES Flexible Commercial CONDITIONS CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33761 JAY MEYERS 9170 OAKHURST ROAD SEMINOLE, FL 33776 PHONE: 727-725-3345 FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727-595-7100 FAX: 727-595-7138 Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due $1,205.00 $1,205.00 $0.00 Total $1,205.00 $1,205.00 $0.00 All conditions must be met before a permit can be issued. ~~ ~ }:.. r:\Forms\InfoSummary.rpt FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ~ c__ C'1 v~ it S ____. FAX: ~ 7--~ ' Phone• .~ °~ S - -7 l ~ FROM:. ~ _Q.1~s Phone: ~' to z- ' _4~-0 ,~, - DATE:_ ~~2 1'~S RE: ~L17 2.-ao S' ' C? 3' D ~ to 7 n o ~ ~ y', a ~-a . MESSAGE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)~___ Jun. 02 2005 04:35PM YOUR LOGO CityOfCle~rwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 , N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95957138 Jun. 02 04:34PM 01'33 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'hENU' #04. TF-EI+1 S~EiECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR ' -' - FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTAhlCE, PL_EflSE CALL 1-890-FIELD-FAX C435-73291. • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FROM: MYERS 8 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE, AIA, P.A. AA-00034b 1 ORIGINAL TO: Planning Department COMPANY: City of Clearwater Florida DATE: May 25, 2005 RE: RCS Food Bank, 700 Druid Road, Clearwater WE TRANSMIT: (X) Herewith FOR YOUR: ()Approval ()Information ()Record THE FOLLOWING: ()Prints ()Specifications ()Change Order ()Submittals ()Under separate cover ()Distribution to parties ()Review and comment (X) Use ()Shop drawing prints/reproductions ()Samples ()Product literature (X) Other COPIES: DATE: DESCRIPTION: 1 4/25/05 Check from RCS for application fee 15 5/23/05 Application 15 3/9/04 Deed 15 9/17/01 Letter from St. Cecelia Catholic Church 15 5/25/05 Stormwater Narrative 15 5/25/05 8 1 /2 X 1 1 Perspective Rendering 15 5125/05 8 1 /2 X 1 1 Site Plan 15 5125/05 8 1 /2 X 11 Colored Elevations 15 5/25/05 8 1 /2 X 11 Landscape Plan 15 5/25/05 24 X 36 A-1 Site Plan 15 5/25/05 24 X 36 A-2 Elevations r 15 5/25/05 24 X 36 A-3 Site Details SAY 2 ~ ZQ~S 15 5/25/05 24 X 36 C-1 Grading 8~ Drainage 15 5/25!05 24 X 36 L-1 Landscape Plan ~ 15 5/25/05 Survey '° ` ` BY ;7 CDB Meeting Date Case Numbers: Agenda Item: Owner/Applicant: Representative: Address: August 16, 2005 FLD2005-05046 FS Religious Community Services, Inc. Ja~Myers, AIA 700 Druid Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GF,NERAL INFORMATION: ORIGINAL REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing social/public service agency with a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 58 feet (along Myrtle Avenue), a reduction to the front (south along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Road (south) from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.4 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-I202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Commercial (C) District; Commercial General (CG) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 1.064 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Social/public service agency Proposed Use: Social/public service agency Staff Report -Community Development Board -August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05046 -Page 1 of 7 • • ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Commercial District; Proposed mixed use development of 48 LAND USES: attached residential dwellings, 2,757 square feet of retail space, and 1,600 square feet of restaurant space East: Commercial and Office Districts; Offices South: Commercial and Office Districts; Offices and vacant West: Downtown District; Retail sales CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area primarily along South Myrtle Avenue and Druid Road is developed with office uses. The We11s Court mixed use development to the north will soon be under construction. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.064 acres is located on the north side of Druid Road, approximately 150 feet east of Myrtle Avenue and on the west side of Myrtle Avenue, approximately 200 feet north of Druid Road. The subject site was part of a larger site encompassing 4.1 acres and bounded by Turner Street on the north, Druid Road to the south, South Myrtle Avenue to the east and the CSX railroad tracks on the west, previously developed as the Scotty's Hardware and Lumber store. The northern 2.79 acres of this overall site was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on August 17, 2004, for the development of Wells Court, a mixed use development of 48 attached residential dwellings, 2,757 square feet of retail space and 1,600 square feet of restaurant space (FLD2004-05039). The subject site was approved for the RCS Food Pantry by the CDB on October 16, 2001, with one condition (FL 01-08-27). The use has operated on this site without any violations since being established in mid-2002. Proposal: Due to the sale of the northern portion of the site for the development of the site for the Wells Court mixed use project, this proposal includes additional on-site parking, the installation of landscaping to the site and additional building improvements. The owners retained only 58 feet of frontage along South Myrtle Avenue with the sale of the northern parcel for the We11s Court project. This eastern finger of the property is solely for parking and landscaping for the use. This area includes an existing driveway on South Myrtle Avenue that will be retained for use by the Food Pantry. Since the building for this use is oriented toward Druid Road and the building was (and is) an existing building, the reduction to lot width will not result in a building out of scale with buildings in the immediate vicinity. The applicant has designed parking and landscaping to the entire site in amounts that are possible for the particular areas of the site, due to the dimensional requirements for parking lots, the need for on-site parking and the location of the building. In some areas of the site there are no proposed landscaping improvements, whereas in other areas there will be improvements meeting Code requirements. Parking and landscaping improvements along Druid Road are in accordance with previously approved plans. There are no landscape improvements proposed along the east side of the property adjacent to the offices to the east, as there is an overhead. door on the east side for loading purposes and apass-by lane otherwise. Landscape improvements along the west adjacent to the CSX railroad starts at approximately 12 feet wide and tapers dawn to zero feet at the Staff Report -Community Development Board -August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05046 -Page 2 of 7 • • northwest corner of the building in order to have an adequate drive width and turning movement for trucks. The applicant is proposing to meet the Code setbacks along the south side of the property adjacent to the office at 708 Druid Road. Existing pavement adjacent to South Myrtle Avenue will be cut back to provide the required 15-foot wide landscape buffer along this major roadway. This front buffer will match that approved for the Wells Court development to the north. The paved area directly north of the building provides maneuvering space for trucks at the two overhead doors on the north side of the building, as well as adequate turning movements for fire trucks. Landscape improvements along the north property line adjacent to the Wells Court development ranges from a minimum of 5.5 feet to 12 feet in width, due to the jogging of the property line, and are being coordinated with the Wells Court development. A six-foot high PVC fence is also proposed along this north property line for buffering purposes. This fence cannot exceed three feet in height within the front setback area along South Myrtle Avenue (the first 25 feet). Some of the tree heights presently indicated do not meet Code requirements. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan must be amended to indicate tree heights that comply with Code requirements. The proposed reductions to setbacks and landscape buffers, and the flexibility requested, significantly improve .these existing conditions and will upgrade and enhance the community character and visual appearance of the immediate vicinity The proposal includes improvements to the exterior of the building for aesthetic and functional purposes. Stucco panels are proposed to the south, east and west sides of the building to break up the metal "skin" of the exterior walls. The west side of the building is also planned with mural space to enhance views from the Pinellas Trail, located to the west of the CSX railroad tracks. Additional windows for the mezzanine will be added on the south side of the building. The existing building is painted a light blue. The applicant proposes to repaint the building the same color, but to add darker shades of blue and white to the stucco panels. The applicant also proposes to screen the dumpsters in the northwest corner of the property in an enclosure meeting Code requirements. A freestanding sign is proposed adjacent to South Myrtle Avenue. Freestanding signage should be limited to a maximum height of six feet and be coordinated with the color of the building. Since the larger site was previously developed as the Scotty's Hardware and Lumber store, the overall original site contained two parcels, In order to modify the parcel lines to that indicated as the north property line of the subject parcel, a Minor Lot Adjustment and Unity of Titie must be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits. A11 applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 704.C) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement cases pending against this site. Staff Report - Conununity Development Board -August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05046 -Page 3 of 7 • • COMPLIANCF, WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-701.1 and 2-704): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.349 AREA RATIO (0.55 X maximum IMPERVIOUS 0.856 SURFACE RATIO X ISR (0.95 maximum LOT AREA 1.064 acres (5,000 - 10,000 sq. ft. X minimum LOT WIDTH South: 155.63 linear feet X* 50 - 100 feet min.) East: 58 linear feet FRONT SETBACK South; five feet (to existing pavement) X* (I 5-25 feet East: 15 feet (to existin avement) REAR SETBACK NfA X (10-20 feet SIDE SETBACK East: zero feet (to existing pavement) (0-10 feet} North: 5.5 feet (to existing pavement) X* West: zero feet (to existin avement) HEIGHT (25-50 feet) 21 feet X PARKING SPACES 39 spaces on-site (additional parking X (3-4 spaces per 1,000 available at St. Cecelia's Church) sq. ft. min.) (49-64 s aces re . * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report -Community Development Board -August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05046 -Page 4 of 7 C] COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-704.C): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, X intensit and develo ment standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair X market value of abuttin ro ernes. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise ermined in the Cit of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill ~ X acent land uses. Redevelo ment Project are com atible with ad ~~ S. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the X immediate vicinit of the arcel ro osed for develo ment. __ 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment '~ Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for X develo ment and the Cit of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the X Cit of Clearwater as a whole. ~~ 8. `Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel X ro osed for develo ment. * See discussion under Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS tSection 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X covera e, density and character of ad'acent ro erties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of ad'acent land and buildin s or si ificantly im air the value thereof. X 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residin or workin in the nei hborhood. 4. Develo ment is desi ned to minimize traffic con estion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinit . 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation X im acts on ad'acent ro erties. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report -Community Development Board -August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05046 -Page 5 of 7 • • FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 1.064-acre site is zoned Commercial District; 2. The subject site was part of a larger site encompassing 4.1 acres, previously developed as the Scotty's Hardware and Lumber store; 3. The northern 2.79 acres of this overall site was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on August 17, 2004, for the development of Wells Court, a mixed use development; 4. The subject site was approved for the RCS Food Pantry by the CDB on October 16, 2001; 5. The reduction to lot width for this eastern finger of the property will be used solely for parking and landscaping for the use and will not result in the existing building being out of scale with other buildings in the immediate vicinity; 6. Proposed parking and landscaping improvements to various areas of the site are based upon the location of the existing building and the dimensional requirements for parking lots of the Code, as well as necessary maneuvering area for trucks and fire trucks; 7. The proposed reductions to setbacks and landscape buffers, and the flexibility requested, significantly improve these existing conditions and will upgrade and enhance the community character and visual appearance of the immediate vicinity; 8. Improvements to the exterior facade of the building will improve the aesthetics of the building; 9. The proposed development is consistent and compatible in scale, bulk, coverage and character with other commercial properties in the vicinity; and 10. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C: 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 30, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing social/public service agency with a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 58 feet (along Myrtle Avenue), a reduction to the front (south along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Road (south) from 10 feet to five feet (to existing Staff Report -Community Development Board -August 1 b, 2005 Case FLD2005-05046 -Page 6 of 7 • • pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.4 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for the site at 700 Druid Road, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704,C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That a Minor Lot Adjustment and Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 2. That the maximum height of fencing within the front setback along South Myrtle Avenue be three feet and be indicated on revised plans prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That all freestanding and attached signage meet Code provisions and be consistent with the color of the building. The Comprehensive Sign Program maybe utilized to provide additional signage in accordance with Code provisions, but freestanding signage shall be limited to six feet in height; 4. That prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be amended to indicate tree heights that comply with Code requirements; and 5. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: Wayne .Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: IPlnnning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIDruid 0700 RCS Food Bank (C) 8. /6.45 CDB - WW1Druid 0700 Staff Report.doc Staff Report -Community Development Board -August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05046 -Page 7 of 7 • • ur JONES ^~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ^a®oowoo^ 8 ~ ~ ~~ o<o ~ ~ o N ~~ ~ ~ ~ HErowacs ~ aRO~ 3~~~ ~~ ^ ~ x ~ a ~ D ^ ^ c~tovE b 14 N E . . ~ J^~^ ^ ~;~ ~ ^ ^ ^m^ ~ ~^^ ^~~ ~ERDE ~o~o=o ~~~~ 3T ~o<^~ ^ ° ~~^ m PIERCE ST PIERCE Y 3T ~ PIERIrE ' V ~; Y' S ~ ^tdK o^^~^^^^ ~~ o HNNIdW g a<~~ ~ t~1 o ODLY27 ST D ® ^ ~ ~ D ~ Sf f`~ CIR < ~ ~"- M ~ _ _ aa^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 34NTA ROSA 'e~ BROWNELL 5T ~~ O CHESTNUT ST COURT ST ROOERS 3T ~ ROOERS ~ a ^ 9 < R TURNER 5T ~ ~~ PROJECT S~ V,rU Pex SI~ '~~ PINE ST ~1 PME y gQ u,~ 9T E h' ~~ ~ PINE 9 sgs ~ ~ I I 9 a _ to O ORUIO RD w DRUID ~ 3 owilo ~ JASMINE ^ WA~ d~ Z ~ ~ a ORK QQ- ~ ~ < 1A ^ ^ ^ MAQNq ~ ~ ~ . ANG ~ i ~I----J ^^ ^ ^a^ ~~ ^ ~ P /i P ~^ LO~ ^ PA~ LO K~ K J JEFFORDS ST o ^ ^ ~ ~~~~ ..EFFOR O K Q^~a OR1WD CBITITAL ~ H<RRRY o.,a ~+ ^~^ ^ L^~^ a a 5 7U5 J~ RIOlER 3 ~ PINELUS~~~~ ~ ~~ z N WAMWS WATKWS 7USKAWILLA Sf iWWS ~ 8 g ~ MLTDN CORSE7T ~ ^ ^ < ~ 5T A ST /~ MBESOE pR V a ~ ~a^a a $ ao WCEVIEW ~ 30UTH yT O ¢ Q °q~ z z g rpr0 0 C~ ~ O ST ~ v3 0 ~ ~ FIAMINOO DR ~ (~ 7 O ~YY ST OF "d Q ~ FisY WEST V " KI 3 Y ~ 1-'~ Location Map Owner: Religious Community Services, Inc. Case: FLD2005-05046 Site: 700 Druid Road Property Size(Acres~: 1.064 PIN: 15/29/15/54450/026/0010 Atlas Page: 2956 • • - +~' ~ ~ "~~ ~ ~ J ` ~f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ N ~~ ~ ~~ v ~ ~_~ 'M ~a ; a s ~ ~ !1 ( 7~ ~ ~~ f _ ~' ' ' i ~ ~ _ J _ ~ w ~ ~ r(`_ ~=~ ;.~ f' i : ~~ } ' 1_~.1_ , '! h T ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~~. ~ _ . _ -r ° ~_ _ r.~ a - ~,~ t N r j •=,~. t ~',:a ~ ~ ~~ i ~, i'~ - ~~ . ~ ~,~` • , .~ . ~r w "~ ~ ~ s. r, r ~ ., 9 N r ~~ ^ 1 ~~ t ~.~ - { 3 ~{'.'f '.~) 4 _ ,~ r t~ f ~ ~#~4 a Tu _ f Sad w _ ` v f :r ~ V x. s r ~ ~ r =1 , Aerial Map Owner. Religious Community Services, Inc. Case: FLD2005-05046 Site: 700 Druid Road Property 1 064 Size(Acres): . PIN: 15/29/15/54450/026/0010 Atlas Page: 2958 • TURNER ST J r -~ ,~ -~ j ~ i I~ I I I~~ -- --__, I I j i ~~_~~ 1 I ~~ t7 _ ,.~ ~ I I I ffi i ~ ro __ I _~ 1 ' ~ _ L I--~ I ~- I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 -J I I 1 1 1 1 _ __ 1 - --- ~ I I I------- I rj I 800 I I I I ~ I _. - __I ~ ~ ~. ~ r ; I I I I I I I I ~- ~ I I _-I j m l I - ~~ i I I o I I ~ I I I I ---- 61 I --~ I 1 --- aog ~-~ I~ -I -- -~ r - I ego HAROLD CT ~~-J ~ - ~ ; `_-' ~ r ~- -J -~ ~ , I ~. .- ~~ I I I ~ ~ -- ~ I 807 608 1-- _ ~ ~ jJ 1 I j W eoa sos i i ! .r ~ ~ ~- ~ a ~ - __ --e-------- ett ~ '' P/NE ST V PINE ST A ___ W 8S ~- T, ~ ~- ,~- , I I-- ~ ~ J l a l_ r Q ' r I I S I _ _r I I ~ -1 ~ ~I I_ J 1 ~s i I j ~ --- I L Ir r 1 I a ~' ~ J Lr I ~ _ _t _ ` ~- ~ _ - - I_ I _ ~~ 1 r--~ I I i I ' I I 703 - r_ ____ I -- i I ~~ I ~~ i I ---.._~ I I I ~ - -~ --- 1 1 810 81 r I ----- I 1 - I 1 1 I I I I_ ~ r•' 1 1--~ ~ I I ~ 1 --- 1 `-----' ~ I I ~ I $ I J I ~-i i ~ I m - ro l I ro ~ I _ _I p y ro O i. K ~ n - ----- o m dD $ $ ~ N I ~ ~ -~ t-------~ --~-- ' I 1 _ I r 1 7 I _J I II__~ _ ~ 1---~ ~ --- I ---1 1"--- 1 ~- I 1 707 I I _I ~ '-~ I O 1 I 1 I __I ---'---, i ' ` 1 ( I 1 I ~ I J I I 1 I t ~ I I I--- ~---; ,~ ~ I r~ r 1 I I I I R T war I r I --° r--- I I I i___ `---------1 ~- ---~--- _ o I ~ ~----1 ~,_,- ~ I -- I 1/~ - 1 I 1 I r~ _I t-_ I ( I I ~ ---„ `__'. I I --I I Zoning Map Owner. Religious Community Services, Inc. Case: FLD2005-05046 Site: 700 Druid Road Property 1.064 SizeiAcresi: PIN: 15/29/15/54450/026/0010 Atlas Page: 2956 • TURNER ST , ~ ~ ~'¢opo HAROLD cr ittaci is ~ e~li 80.5 Q09 y~ P/NE ST dS ~- ~, r~ r~ ; ~! 1-I l r-- ~ ~ ~ I I I I I ` ~ Re it ~ ~ --z_, ___-- ; filye s ~+ I ~al s I I _ Of~3ces ! _! rl Im o ro ~- -I m ~ a ~ DRUID RD ~-------, __ --, ~ i --~_ ~-----1 I ~ t _ I ~ 1 ---~ I - ~ I I 1 t__r-- L--~--~ I ~ I I I---~ '---- dffic fs OtTices ~-I ~_ I I , 707 ~ ~ ~ _, ~ I I I r I I I --~ `I I ~ i ( 1 I I I I j l~__~ I I~ I I ~ I I l__-~---i I ~ ~ 1 ~, ~' , 1 -~' ~---~ i i `--- - -j `---------~ I ~ ~ -~ • ;~ ~__ _~ Ot~ices I e c~~ ~ B07 c- - liin Q PINE ST y e,o ~o~ $ ~ ~I $ i ~` i ~ ' - `- ` ce -- ~ t r~ 1 I 11~ s ti_ '- r-- ~, ' Fuineral I I ---~ ~ H I I- et c ed ' b ~ m ~ __ _ ___~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q -~ Parking Lot q 's ~ ~~ JASMINE WAY _ o Existing Surrounding Uses Map Q ti W y 0 4 y Owner. Religious Community Services, Inc. .Case: FLD2005-05046 Site: 700 Druid Road Property 1.064 Size(Acres): PIN: 15/29/15/54450/026/0010 Atlas Page: 2956 View looking north at existing building on subject property View looking south at rear of existing building - -.~, View looking southeast at rear of existing building View looking east at parking area out to Myrtle and parking out to Myrtle Avenue Avenue 700 Druid Road FLD2005-05046 Page 1 of 2 ,._, ~ View looking north at west side of existing building (railroad tracks and Pinellas Trail on left) • ,~~t ~~-~ View looking north at offices east of subject View looking west at retail sales on the north side of Druid Road west of subject property 700 Druid Road FLD2005-05046 View looking south at offices to the southeast of View looking southwest at offices to the southwest of subject property -_ ~ ; ,.~ ~~~, _ ,~ View lookilig north at area of the fuhu~e attached dwellings of Wells Court north of subject property Page 2 of 2 View looking south at vacant land south of subject property :~;' : ~. ~~ ~~; -t,~ E'~,~~~ Req'd Tree Size Condition ~ i Conditions Associated With FLD2005-05046 700 DRUID RD Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 06/22/2005 7/13/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval the size of trees (slash pine & dahoon holly). 6/22/05 - W W Per Section 3-1202.B.1 -Code requires trees to be 10' in height and 2 1/2" cal. at planting, ornamental trees can be 8' in height and 2" cal., and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at planting. Revise the Plant List on Sheet L-1. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 06/02/2005 7/13/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval, including setbacks and coordination of landscaping around the sign to minimize visual obstuction of the sign. 612/05 - W W A separate sign permit will be required for the proposed sign shown on Sheet A-3. 06/22!2005 7/13!05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval. 6!22/05 - W W A Minor Lot Adjustment must be submitted to the Planning Department, approved and recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for improvements under this FLD approval. This will also require the recording of a Unity of Title for the subject property (Planning will prepare along with the Minor Lot Adjustment paperwork). 06/22!2005 7113105 - W W Not Met Include as a condition of approval. 6/22/05 - W W Maximum height of fence along north property line in the front setback of Myrtle Avenue is three feet. Revise. Print Date: 08/08/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 3 N N 0 O N O N M O 'a W N f6 V •.- C .~ v •~- - 286A ~ 2 7 A • ~ OAK BLUFFS 30 s9 CITY OF CLEARWATER CONDO 102-97 w Ae . t to y a es t 1 Iw g +D 3i 28 27 ~ e e $ ~ "# ~ ~. AND VICiNiTY D. e l-m , ~ ` ~ ~~tl ~ PINEiLA3 COUNTY. FLORIDA PRELU E 80 3 R S T r -. _ R PREPARED er q 2 t CONDO REPEAT 4 » 4o S 2 t t g g ' T ~ 4 ~ $ ~ ~. ~ PUHllC WORN NCNISTRATION N ER 6- Q I $ 2 7 7 $ S $ ~ 12 1 '^ ~ 3 . ( we 8 $ d E , '~i~ A~ tDD $. Mytk Ave.. Ckwwoter, fl 33>58 '0~ T_ PR (l2l)SBi-4750 F (72>)426-1155 ROCCRS TRCET °or S ~ ~~ : , o>: r 3 w4 ai4 t II ~$ $ ~ ar » 4 5 y ROCER S ST 7 REE - t 2 3 4 2 II 2 3 4 nttD:!/www.Neaw0la-n.com/Dtt Da 1 \ D wk w,k:/en Y- Do, man s/ u gtnee/ D,xb,mer: Spa HARBOR °~ OAKS I a S 2 i 4 3 l 2 t 2D ~ t0 a adr ~ R ^ R 47 t I A 3 ® 4 S ea. PuDiIC MtormOtiOn onto Is turn4ned b or baarwater the CIt ~, yo~ PLACE pp aPo 5 3 '~ t ~ ~ i Y y PuDile WOrke AomMl>irOtbn/EngNeMlnq, Ontl m s1 be occepted CONDO are an 11 ( M ers a 3 2 / ~ R S t ew _~ y '~ t t0 9 t g T 6 10 9 8 7 6 t6 15 t4 1 and eed Dy the recipient wllh Ine understondinq in of (he doto recNved wos cd,ected for the purpose or aerNOOnq o gropnlc I I 14-21 5 51 17 ~ B S ~ 7 - e er O2 a ' 2 ase eae 6 8 _ 9 t0 ~ ~ ® 301 P A .n+rp>np°wre mren,wy. Aa wrn, the coy pt neprwpter PWA/E mesas no wa.ontt», eaDre»ed or Impnea, concammq the $ ~ 8 ~ SSI F, z D ~ 6~4 7 w(~ q ~ I 8 ~ ~ Occ ~ocy. <omDiHMe». rNiODflIt Y~ or >ull~tllly of Lola dat0 (or finer porllpulor uae. Durinermore, tn< Cit of CleOrwotn TVRNE ,~ e ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ g F $ ~ PWA/E o>wmes no Ib0°tly wnotsoever ossocoted wish the use r mew>e er wch tlato HICKORY ~ w ] $ S TRE ET . ctro e CONDO ~ ~ w ~ E ^ Y & ~ ~ ° ~ ^ ~ 9 w > ^ ]4 ° T i l Ai e01Ci 90-116 1 eor t 7 a 2 ew BpT Hi N 3 w 2 t p II ~ 0 .. : e S ~ ~S eor h la> p0 w odb Chon > to Der 9e i> Je~ qea. For ;ntormat+on obout , on Dleose cd, PwA/E ar test CAMELOT OAKS 2 ' 4 2 eo4 ~ 3 nu s 4 3 2 t 2 t aoa 34T a 4 ~ 3 2 1 3 ew g y t 2 {e t r Wee w>~ ow a -106 Y Q° < °f 3 am w & 1 - 7 3 I 7 e oe em 0 S 5 6 7 g 1 4 5 f 2 3 4 5 N eve R T MARKLEY a^ eoc eoa 2 ero aoe ° eve t r '~ g ~ &° ~ a . . t0 28 A R t Orr 2 t sa v e 10 9 7 6 - ero SH RE are eu coa rh 7 R HA g 6 7 g 15 to i 9 8 4 0 9 t SS 8 35er~ era ca I &3 eii eiaaAS'SA 3,jr: ea 2 •x/o+ ere srr rso+-tip ® ROLO $ Ct R 70 9 g ~ oe I ~&~ air ~$ r3 ,~, t0 9 a t2 tt ~ D 8 e rr S ~- $ ( rsa><b w+_r,s ~ S 816 7! ~ B A N 0 100 200 400 600 T STREET R R 7~' 6 t ios »a >ar q 5 4 3 m ror 8 " ~ >bo $' wr ~ ea 2 1 ~ 2 S t wr $ a $ ~ < 1 SCALE: t a00 ~} ~~.(P T) % D roa 5 t 5 t 2 3 4 3 t 2 3 a ~~ >or a~ n R n 5 s >oa < m. 3 ~ r01 roe ro> ~ 4 0. > 3 1 g 'O $ ' y c i i 8 8 9` - roe iD 6 3 2 ]e » 1 8 5 a 3 1 2 rZ i 1 2 4 S LEGEND: ~>0> ' > ° ° nr 6 T - 1 ___ J 2 31 29 27 ~5 23 60 21 I, i7 iS ii 9 7 g 3 >ro 8 10 it g t t0 19 g 7 10 9 7 6 6 15 14 t a ( 1 , ~ 1 g O BLOCK NUMBER eoo C RV p ~ ~ ~ $ ~ i es ROAD w[St ~ 1234 LOT ADDRESS N R I 32 ° H^ w ~ ~ (; ~ ° ~ ~ a w° w' ~ 3 ~ ~ aerl-er - CITY LIMITS LINE _-__ o 3 0 28 26 24 22 2 08 (20A /8 `I t6 t! t2 10 8 Ig 4' y f0a 2 tt 70 9 t 2 w A t 2 3 3 5 t 2 3 10b 3 Pte.-~1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY eve 63 59 gi ( 57 5 1 5 ( 53 518 to 9 4 7 45 43 41 3 9 aro ~ O RUHItL L'~~"J OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS eoa $ P ~ 8 1 1 37 1 33 33 Z a0r 4 6 7 6 v 4 23 8 10 9 8 7 6 3 10 9 8 eEO a R ~ 3 z ~ A am apy s PRO SIGNAL e ~ ~ AGREEMENT TO ANNEX ~o w ~~~ WA Y R » 19Z eq we o I n ~ d ' ~ ° " ° CEN • CITY OWtJED PROPERTY 66w 64 62p (60 58 I 56 i 54 52 Y B 52A 50) 4 8 : 8 1 1 ~ w 000 wr t 7 b k h L MDR ZONING DESIGNATION S a6 44 42 4 38 }g 3 n w1 2 1 10 9 y t 2 CONDO t 2 ~" Q 9t 89 ~ e e~ S c 5 ZONE LINE ( 7 $ I 93 I HA B OR g7 g s I ffi 7 177 ( 7s (73 711 69 7 6 a s 7 g s 24 23 68-121 ~ p i A ~ w> ' 1 8 tb 9 8 7 6 ~ ave q $ . ~ MAGNOLIA ~ t~ g S ~ ~ E ` ~' 1AACRlOIiA o[z°n[ oRD w < ~~ . roar 102 t00 98 196 l 94 92 w I e , I A Q row wer k R ~ k k ~ n ~ p Ss7, o3/os/94 ® za>+ os/+>/ss 1 40 88 86 84 82 8 0 7 g 78 17 4 72 70) Bg 2 ti t0 y i Z 3 l S 8 7 8 9 2 3 ~ ~ ®saa °./DS/95 bt A C N O L t A g ' < e i ~ p 5480 D1![0/9+ i39 t17 t35 I t33 131 it29 2 II 1 2 5 t23 7278i2,A 7t 71 7 fly i 71 t r 1000 1 © 396+ 08/,]/96 © 6l3>/31}8 +0/15/98 R a? 1 I ~ 6 ~ p a ~ roar P ( ~ R 1 q 1 g t~7 ic}s 103 roa6 a 8 7 8 22 2/ 20 19 t8 t7 t6 i5 1 D P C A t0 R 9 K 8 7 8 t! w %w. Ewu+vw LOTUS P , I R R roee 5 ro $ Ci] ee.o °./lc/o, ^ 1 ~ n A N S 'FY6_~A. _ __ _ - -~ - - $ t vg I t~8 134 t32 1130 1 . 728 t t a Y i2 2B i22 A 172 1 18 4 tt~ I tt1 R ,7 ) rao roe rror t § . re. a ]ewt[ae N i 26 2 2 17 0 108 108 704 ep. pave 1 2 3 I 5 6 7 8 2 " rro < 0 2 t 3 4 y C ~ 28 26 5 24 3 22 21 2 0 t9 6 17 6 ~ r 3 4 SC A 8 i 5 w ® j, F pt 1 tS to t3 t2 tt 9 r 8 7 6 I S a 3 ' rroe 2 1 0 8 ~ b ~ 3 ~ : : s $ ? 8 eenoet» >q rtrov 2t 20 t9 te n to ,s D c l0 9 a 7 s ~ ~ * REVISED: - - _ .IE_Yr•atDe - - ` T aa Ara'e +.9I' . 04.09 R ~ ~ ~ a Ra rA.> 10 e 09/09/2002 R R e x err repo - - -- -- - ~ ZONING ATLAS 36 35 S a ~ ~ 2~ t2/02 aa ~ a R ~ 2 a t 2 w ~ y w ~S8 ^• b : ~ e o $ k e i ~ 3 2 t 2 i /2 3a 12/01 w ~ ~~ ~>; R i; ~~t.'Z~~& Y $ $E 1 /4 OF SECTION - 305A 2 9 5 B • 30 58 306A ~ 16 - 29 S - 15 E .+l/ C~ ~ ~ - - 2868 • 7A _ _ 7g .~ x •0 "~~~ e S ° to zo ~ 19 s 7 8 9 70 tt u a 'a a7 6 x a CITY OF CLEARWATER R _~ ~ +a 8 ~ 8 S Ia 3 ~2 `~"" g/or ANO VICINITY ---- --sT- R-- .""'~• r,+ 8 ~ 8 ~~Jtlt ~ PINE<LA3 COUNTY. FLORIDA ~ PREPAFED BY 3 8 m 8 8 m 8 m ° m ^q e q .~ 8 COl/R7 St' en ~ ~ ~ PUBLIC NORKS AD'diNISTRATION aor ~ $ k s g 71 L~ ~ ENCINEEFINC COURT ~ 31/11 31/10 /08 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 100 5. Nyve Ave.. Clearwater, pE 33758 ~., m CONDO 3t/o6 ~~ ~ ,,t 8 } ~ ~ 3 ~ Pn.; (]27}362-1750. Fox: (]2»528-6755 ',g 2 3 a 5 8 7 8 S2-BY a S B 7 8 9 t0 17 12 13 t4 t5 31/09 ~ < a_ ~ ~ t3 3 a 5 aoa < p> ~t a ORLlXf d0r 3t/o7 C 3t/oa ~ t $~ a 3oA tr nuP://www.neorwot«-a.corn/Cfty_Daponmanta/PUeoe_worp:/fnglnee</ x000 NBDICALeop I ~ t t 308 Dlaaialmer; so t i ° AND REIIABiUTATNfN 3t/Oa k A + 60° ~ yro> e` $ ~ PuWiC Intormotton tlota is turn4Mtl Dy tna CItY or Qeorwoter 8 7 6 •t5 15 to i} t2 17 p, 9 1i 32 8~~ et 2 S S ROCffiffiRS PuDlie Worts AOmhiairation /EngNeerinq, o tl must De accepted Q ~ 10 6M }t 30 29 28 27 28 25 24 23 22 21 20 9 4 aoa etl N $T and used oy tht rerioienl with the underftandb~q that the data 31/13 nA received wm cdiectrd far the purpose or aevNOp4.q o gropnk E & S 8 B MlrOftrvclure inventory. Af ach, the Gty or Cleararoter PWA/E ~ I ~ M RA p 4 5 8 8 ~ v 2 4S ig S ate is t0 motes no worronttea, aspreaaed or implied, eoneernkq the 2 r g g asr ~ accuracy. compitieneaa, r Ilob1111y, or au71W11ity of thN data roe _ ~ 8~ i A R v e 1E -t ~ 8'q~ ~ 27 < 7 any roar oerramor uu. ~urtnermorn m~city or eieorwetarx « INNER ~ (~ 138 13 PWA JE assumes no ItaDBily whatsoever o ocloted wNh the u 1A r mhUae Of NCh data. e ; ~ em aoa b t 3 < 5 ~+ ~ as 's 7 6 8 ~ 60 A o 6 al , 2 1 a 6 6 8 t5 14 t3 12 ii 10 e 9 ~ a8 i; >3 Y , > a ST $ e soa ^ > R ao ~ 3 £ ~ ~ e » ~ $_ A ~ 8 ~ 6 ~ i ~ ag3 ~ ~ ~ _ r r E ~ ~ ~ 6 S Tnif Arias Ooge is weN pct to Penodk anongea. i 2 3 of 31/75 m n n ~~tt p4 Fa Information about latest revisip~s please ca11 PWA/E w oa a S 6 7 8 9 t0 11 12 73 t4 75 76 ~ ~ ~ n 37/t9 Y 2 9 ,~` 20 1 4" 7~ 17 76 75 a 12 77 ~ > Malt our wee site. oa 0 ~~ to e 32 co> 30 29 28 ~ 5 4 } 2 1 0 9 8 p 17 °e ten 6 1 7 c 8 $ 9 10 .~ e 11 /2 Y ~ t 1 2 3 4 9 7 B 9 10 alt ~) a q 42 /Oi N Q P 27 26 e, eat } 5 ~ e p4c v„c ~ " ata 4Z/02 Bit R ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ z 4 ~ atno-~o g t - s,_ a2/D3 frl 3 PINE ~ Sr $~ t 2 3 a 5 6 ~~ t 2 3 a 51 6 ~ 7 9 er @@ s ,roo $ ,~ a to o too 20o aoa soo 7al $ $ ^$ § e i >oo ~I 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 4 rot g $1 3 >oe ror d 7 6 6 15 to t3 72 11 1 >ae $ 3 ~ ~ $ a $ X ~ 8 ° ~ Q l S! H $ E a t of ~ 4 5 6p 7 8 9 70 7t t2 t/ 0 i5 t6 32 37 }p _ 29 28 27 28 a Y4 23 22 2t 20 ~9 78 > 9 di Xd I >u $ e 'Zw g S € ~ # Y ~ q ~ 4z/oa i t2 it 10 9 8 7 ~ 211" 7g 78 7 16 7} ~ S t3 ti >°° A t4 SCALE: i" 400' 2 22 S flNE yr ~ 12 en 42/05 3 a, Ypes ~- .rm'>m >09 2D >o q>rt a2/°6 LEGEND: a 21 P t9 18 t7 t6 t5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 70 >,D 5 6 7 8 9 t0 tt 12 t3 i4 2D t ~ t8 t7 t6 5 t t3 tt>te ~ w 42/07 O BLOCK NUMBER :; t2 N u , ~ 0 VI m,.-:n B ~ ftw-.» ffi Ep ~ 1234 LOT ADDRESS N t 2 3 6 6 8 1 o 80 a r I 30 j ~ C e eo `r » ~-~ • a ' } `~' R A I ~ »7z-»r W ___~ - CITY OMITS LINE 3 a g 5 t 1 3 4 i 7 5 -- _ _! ' ` ; ~ - tD 9 8 7 6 h , ~g a ( 34/03 '~ ~ ~ ~ } < a tD ~ ' 'f aoa r--'! SHADED AREA - PROP ~'-"J OUTSIDE CLEARWATER C ERTY ITY LIMITS s 7 s8 a < 3 e ~ a e Y 'y+'! ;~ ~ em S< 7 ~ °' . $ ~ ~ az$ I ~~ ~IIQDEN )OAKS; ;; 6 • AGREEMENT TO ANNEX " JAA.MNE Y 8 ____ ; i t I ~ I pal ~ ~ F eop ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi $ Q - -_- - '~ ~4,/ ~ ~ 1\ $ 9 ~ S • CiTY OWNED PROPERTY 3 a a_ I , .. 8 ~ . . .,.s ., r. ~ tg p d ` ;01 '`' /i; YONK ~ ' ~ < ' ror MDR zONINO DESIGNATION C ' O~ a eea ' t> O C'i ao --_ ____ ;i _____ " , 1, ,. ~ ~ •/ 3a/Ot V g vnt 7 6 ~ 8 7 ° q p sae ; ~~ ,~ ^ ZONE LINE p g C ~ u to we ,;%%" ^..v-----Ir___°Y': APA~'fME-1'VTS^~,, , i~ ara I ~ ` a MA IA ~ a \ r _---- ,' ~,: o S,. _ _ _1:___1`1 .\ pao s n N a 100! $ ` @ ~ S "' ~ rttp c' •.TL _ ~ ` ' S REZWE OaD ~ ~ 3 n ~ a ~ n __n_r ~ ______- ,ror; ---r,__ ~ _,r o ,7ao ,tro,~ae ~ 4 5 e d °~ 8 > f °~ ~ r t ~i a .. ------- - Trot _ ~riiai~~~ - ~ ~ ' ~ mar 6 ®33potoro7ro3 ®sen m/ro/9. ~+ s 8 7 s § "a r m° • a ~~ ~ ;; r~ /,' ~ , , ~ A1A ISTffEET~ AP ATE 3 c' ;~ t; na R~N~.t'S`~`AN CE S( 1VA~2E~'. 7 a Spa, DB>,zroa ®aeea ozi°s/oo ( pa ,z 44JJ Ia,D ~ 9 n r ~~ • y roro • ~ ~ , , ; , ~ FS ~__ L ~ -rrror~ } . I e ~ - _ ' ' ~ w rr , t I 'D 3 4 5 a ~ ~ • , 1106 ~• •• ^ ^ ^ xo • f era n •, • ` a r ° ~ ~ i . ._... ,mo ma..rt Aar, a.:~ t _ .. .. _... ._...~ - -- ________ _-___~ _~ ___ __ rm, NO r a _ _ C.7 _ C _ __ 7 B 7 8 1106 C * 1 ~ • me y ,. ' " .~ o ~ ' CJ r1---r 34/012 '`L - - , ; ~ „ V ~ ~ a REVISED: i Q ~~ 3o rroe q 0 eD ^ ~ „ ~ so to • ~} ; ,...._.... LEXINGTON CLUB AT } ~. "" (: rm 3 tt 8/26/2002 >_ •- - - a tE4-»e ~ ~ " ,~rroNOS _ _ - - _ S~ 1 " _ -~ ; : i ~ ( ~ RENAISSANCE SQUARE:; --- - =;~ m '~-ear. ~ _ ,,, ,o,:_~, N I N G AT o LAS a h ~ ~ ~ a ^ n >a ~ ~ ~ s ~ e ; ~ aD ~ ~ ~ a ~. ~ eD $ , ~ ~ ' -- U---- _ ,rr. ~ ~i ~ [r. 3 - 2 i _ 6 5 4 3 2 7 6 5 4 3 2 i 22/Ot .. - 3747_Te u -v r~ .,~ ~~~:. Sw 1 /d OF SECTION 2 9 6 A 305B • 3 06A 306E ~ 15 - 29 S - 15 E • • Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:59 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: F~D2005-05046 zone.doc location.doc FLD Map request existing.doc aerial.doc form.doc Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 8:16 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Nerman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 700 Druid Road Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-05046 for the property at 700 Druid Road. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks - Wayne « File: FAD Map request form.doc » 1 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 8:16 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 700 Druid Road Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-05046 for the property at 700 Druid Road. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks - Wayne FLD Map request form.doc • • Flexible Development Application -Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2005-05046 Date Requested: July 18, 2005 Date Requested for (date): July 29, 2005 Maps Requested x^ Location Map x~ Aerial Map x^ Zoning Map x^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering x^ Legal Description x0 Survey x^ Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: Religious Community Services, Inc. 'Case: FLD2005-05046 Site: 700 Druid Road 'Property Size(Acres): 1.064 PIN: 15/29/15/54450/026/0010 '! Atlas Page: 295B ,v W 286A - ~ [ooES L~~A ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER OAK BLUFFS CONDO 102-97 ,4 4 w 29 ~ ~~ Itl ~ •e wp. Ak .en-m a, 9t 27 ~ : : $ : 8 ~ '0 ~``~y ~li PINELl1S COUNTY PUDRIDA PRELU E BO 3 (YES T R __ cT et PREPARED BY CONDO REPEAT 4 2 t ,0 4 3 2 t 3° 1 B s ° 4 A 8 ~ T ~~ ! PUBLIC 1YORICS ADMINISTRATION e w ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ENGINEERING 8- O I g 2 7 7 3 wI2 1 ~ ~ 79 tpD 5. Ny.tle AYe.. Cba«pter, FL 33756 I Mr ~ ~ PR: IT27)561-I73D. Fw: (J27)SM-1755 ROOERS BEET 3 ~ eo4 a4 eer 5 ® t II 2 J q nllp://'•*w~Hearw°Ur-D.com/Cfly~aporlm9nik/pudk_«orks/mglnNr/ a ~ eT 5 ROGERY 47REEt - 2 r >~ 4 HARBOR 3a 9 1 2 3 4 t 3 4 5 OlxlOtmer ~°' OAKS . 33 z 7 4 3 2 17 20 '~ tD are a ~ ~ I A ® ea Puab bt°rmouon dom is Eurnlmed py In: sty pr a9°r,ale. ",~ ~1 pp a S 3 ew t ~~ ~ 1 PuDIIC WOrk9 Adm M191fOlbn /EngFeerlnq, and must De oCCepled ~ PLACE ale 4 7 2 t R 6ao __ II 1 pod ufed Dy the reNDient ellh ine underalDndNq toot lne Bolo an 1 I pj ete ~ , ~ t tU y 8 7 e t0 9 B 7 6 ,6 75 74 t receives was roueded for lne purpose or devdoDM9 o gropnlc I CONDO 5 6 7 _ an 2O ~ q 2 eae ea6 B _ sps 13 A imrostrudure Ime 1ory. As sucn, the cRy or Elearwoter PWA/E 14-21 I I 8 5 ~ 7 8 8 9 10 C ~ mOk14 no worrpnikf, apreaaetl or Imp11a4 c nnrnlnq lne ~ g 8 s x saa E 2 D. e„ 7 .~ n ©~ © } C DeOUrpcr. cDmaetmeaa. relpemtT. a ,utlp6miy pr lnt5 amp rpr pny other porupurpr ux. Fwtnermore, Ine city 0r aeorwoter TURNER ~ .~ ~ 4 r ~ R ~ ~ $ ~ PWA/E o wm no IbDAily wn°lsoever ossoci°led «Iln the ux NICKDRY ~ g ~ ~ x ~ s OYTREET d m9U~ OI 9u Ch dOto. WroY6 Y G e p ~ 99 u A R s ~ Sf t Thls A11os le euoO Fl la lodb Mon cpnpo se-na ^ I ear I iD 4 ~ eop epx £L a 2 1 i E w e ear $ page tec ,s per gee. CALIELAT ~ 4 eo, 3 Z !n~ Hl t3 ~ 4 II I' ~ Fw Mformption o6out lOlekl rev ions please call PWA/E o 4 3 2 1 ` ~ 2 vlslt our WeD site. onxs Y 1' 3 2® eos 4 3 2 t 2 1 spa 341 ~ 3- 4 & 1- 7 soo y 1 3 a -106 7soa ~ o> ea ep> 1 so> 5 5 6 7 g , 2 3 4 5 7 2 3 4 5 N eoe a° eoa e9e sa ° ew a 'e 6 ~ dCa ~ e R.T.1dARELE A 2 IO-2B ero SH RE err a, R 1 ero an 2 aoet rn a° 7 ^ ~ 7 R HAROlO CT ~ 10 9 8 7 s 10 q 8 7 6 ~ 6 75 14 1 35 4 8 35ere eu &3 ers °eiaaS4q 3„Prr ea 2 ii~~ ero sn >5ot-ta"J s g ' e 9 ~ g~ i 4 su ~$~ ~Q er. '1 t0 ` 12 H tD 9 n 8 '~ YA<.rzD.a._„e, .,a S ~ ' 1` BAN N STREET s s o too zoo soo soo _ = - 7 g ~ 6 t >p9 >p, T 8 T ~ >or 4 H ILT N s PR,E ~,. e: >e. $. ~a~ b >or roa 2l A ~ 3 2 t >a ~4 g I ~ ~ ~ >a $ SCALE: t" = a00' wn 11iY1 >oe S } ~l(P T) i ' >a < a 4 E 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 t 2 3 a .,a 4 `h s roaa 3 >,<, >pa , o $~ s€ 8 >pe 3 z 6 5 4 3 2 LEGEND: ~~ R 5 >m >o> 3 6 `~ B 9 tD e x 79 2 J>°> >oe >o> s > 5- 1 ® 7 >o 2 6 75 ,4 t 0 7 6 .-____ 37 29 27 I25 23 e0 27 Ii t7 1} I 17 9 7 5 } >r0 '~ B 70 n ~ t t0 I9 B 7 1 w~ •~ $ ~ ~ >rr ~ t s 9 ~ O BLOCK NUMBER Q ~ eD : n = R ~ '~ A X yea < g ~ ~ ~ S $ $ ~ y" N ~ ~ ~ $ $ ~ 1234 LOT ADDRESS ~ eoo MIAO ROAD WE4T ~ C'V ~ _ ~ e 5aa~ D ~ CITY LIMITS LINE & 4 ~ '- ~ C R C R soo ear t ~ § 2 - I 32 30 28 26 24 22 I~ ,;, _-__ 208 I~OA 18 ~I1B t l 12 10 B IB 4I 2 spa 2 11 70 9 1 2 A 7 2 3 4 S t 2 3 r.-~.-1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTv sae 3 ~ O DRUHILL l:~<~J OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS sot I 59 57 55 53 SiB to p9 q7 ; q3 I47 I}g a I35 33 63 61 I ~ 70 9 6 ~ eo> 4 6 7 8 4 23 B 10 9 6 7 68 • AGREEMENT TO ANNEX .m °0i $ ~ a s em = ex 5 PROFESSIONAL ~ ~~~ ,NAY e Y % t91 S • CITV OWNED PROPERTv ry spr $ I r, ~, ~ ^~ M, 66 64 62^ 160 58 I 56 i 54 o e ~ N ~O 99 17 95I 93 HA BOR 87 N ~ ~ d a E ~ : ` « spa 528 52A SOI 46 46 1 44 142 ~ 38 36 J4 BSI 83 Bt 7 I77 175 I73 7tI 69 67 ~ a A °~ °" " CENTER xr t ~ $ MDR ZONING DESIGNATION • r0a z et tD 9 r 1 2 CONDO A, 2 3 m s ~" aw 3 68-121 ZONE LINE m q 6 7I 8 5 24 23 B 10 9 8 7 6 _~ Y y Q ~ I MAGNOLIA ~~ 5~D0° ~ $ R Y N x 1,ATx+OIIA REZaNE OPD. ,°°, 8 p f 02 7 ~ 98 196 n i94 92 90 68 739 t+J7 t35 11331 tat 1129 Eli 7625 123 rn a l I ~ ~"3 ~ I a a ^rppp r 66 84 82 BO 78 178 I74 72 70 I E6 t216I,2tA tEP n7 p16 T~ t7tl ,01 it37 ,qs ,03 ,oer $ ~ x ~ roee DRIVE 1001 ~ 55T OS/05/9. R k SL R R 1; ~ ~ m se>. 0a/pros 2 71 10 y 1 2 3 4 S 8 7 B 9 2 3 ~~ m yen o+/05/95 ~ roe, 3 b(A C N O L[ ® 5%. 09/+5/96 PARK 3 ®eu>/a36a +0/tsroe ,~ q B 7 B p C 10 9 8 7 6 >< S.w. E>PN190N 22 21 20 t9 78 t7 t6 15 1 p x.o 0e/197m 5 roro LOTV S PATH C -F7 8_ie71 NC __ ___ $ ~ ~ 134 e ~ I .~ ~ ~ I R II , I $ ,wa m» t ~ >5E s ~ ,IYTOIR9 N r $ t ~ e t36 732 130 128 726 t2a 7228 1 22A t20 118 t te 114 tt2 et0 tDg 1o0I 70a 2 tt eq. PROE: 7 U 2 1 I 5 6 7 8 2 3 w ^ ._ L R ,ro 28 26 „ 5 24 3 22 21 20 t9 B 7 6 uoe 3 4 dC A B t a 5 C C m & F' ~ 1 R 15 14 $ t 3 '.3 12 11 E ry I 9 8 b L 7 4 6 R I S 4 3 ; A i 2 ors eta o 'y ~. 8 ,EITheDa z sq b 27 zo re $ 18 17 16 ' t6 1 0 C ~ 10 9 B 7 6 9 ~ 10>, ~ >F REVISED; 09/09/2002 • _ _ e R a _ EF-O T a R ~ i' 8 , N w rroa ~ ~ i -- -- -- -- >u ., ZONING ATLAS i 36 35 ¢ s 4 3 z , r, z , s ala , /o3 ~ ,2D / 2 rroo ,2/D, ~$ 35ae °0 's$ a° ~"s$ _ :a ES :: a,; :: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :; E e ~ e a a 8 ~ ~ e s ~ 5A z SE ~ /a OF SECr10N 295B ~ • 3056 306A ~ i6 - 29 S - 15 E ~ ~ n Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:09 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: FYI -----Original Message----- From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 3:24 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Sherry, hove checked on all of these and P&R is okay on all of them. Thanks! Debbie O -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:45 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Case- F~D2005-05051- 445 Hamden Drive has arrived it is also in the same location Thank you Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, l"eresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. F~D2005-05037 -1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. F<_D2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. F~D2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. F<.D2005-05042 -1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. F~D2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schodlter 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 -1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark 8 Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Sherry Watkins - • • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:00 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: FYI- Email from Anne Blackburn -Fire Thank you Sherry -----Original Message----- From: Blackburn, Anne Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 4:05 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Hi Miss Sherry, I checked the resubmittals listed below in your a-mail and listed below is the current status as per Fire: FLD2005-05037 -Conditions Met FLD2005-05046 -Conditions Met FLD2005-05044 -Conditions Not Met FLD2005-05043 -Conditions Not Met FLD2005-05042 -Conditions Not Met FLD2005-06052 -Conditions Met FLD2005-05038 -Conditions Met LUZ2005-05009 -Conditions Met I checked these resubmittals today, and based on the info included in the resubmittals, the above listed indicates the status. Thanks for all your help, Sherry, Anne -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05037 -1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005.05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 -1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schodlter 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 -1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. ~f, We also have 2 cases coming b -noon today and Adams Mark & Opus due~by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon Y 1 will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Sherry Watkins Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:15 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Tefft, Robert Subject: FW: FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Sent to wrong person. Oops. D. Scott Rice Land Deve% Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyC/earwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:07 AM To: Tefrt, Robert Subject: FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Rob, Engineering has completed review of the subject resubmittal and updated Permit Plan. The only condition of approval is: A permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent City street(s). D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyC/earwater.com 1 • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05037 -1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 -1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schodlter 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 -1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Raom 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out}. Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if passible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark 8~ Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Sherry Watkins i ~ ~~ 1 ?'35 pm Case Number: FLD2005-05046 -- 700 DRUID RD . Owner(s): Religious Community Services I ~, 1855 Highland Ave S Clearwater, Fl 33756 ~'~ TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Jay Myers ~~ 9170 Oakhurst Road Seminole, F133776 TELEPHONE: 727-595-7100, FAX: 727-595-7138, E-MAIL: myersarch@ix.netcom.com Location: 1.064 acres located on the north side of Druid Road, approximately 1 SO feet east of Myrtle Avenue. and on the west side of Myrtle Avenue, approximately 200 feet north of Druid Road. Atlas Page: 295B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing social/public service agency with a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 58 feet (along Myrtle Avenue), a reduction to the front (south along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Road (south) from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.4 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: SociaUpublic service agencies Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Downs-Blackburn Applicant: Carrie Hawley, Jamie Austin, Phil Jester Other: Norma Carlough The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. A separate right-of--way permit will be required for all work within the right-of--way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727)562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 30, 2005 -Page 47 ~, 1 . This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construcrion plans or documents other than site work. 2 . Provide a fire hydrant within 300 feet of most remote point of the building. 3 . Application indicated renovation of existing building. Renovation may require the addition of fire sprinkler system and the underground fire water supply line to facilitate the fire sprinkler system. Provide addditional information PRIOR TO CDB. 4 . If building is to be protected by a fire sprinkler system the FDC must be located at least 15 feet from the building and within 40 feet of the fire hydrant. Please address this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . If building is to be protected by a fire sprinkler system, all underground water mains and hydrants must be installed, tested and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please address this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 6 . Driveways to be minimum 24 ft for ingress and egress of emergency vehicles. PRIOR TO CDB. '7 . The rear parking lot is in excess of 150 ft in length. Provide fire department turnaround, Y, T, or cul-de-sac. If either of the two driveways on the east or west side of the building are to be used as a means of egress for emergency vehicles from the rear parking lot it must be a minimum 20 ft wide, exclusive of curbing, landscaping, parking spaces, etc., and must have signage indicating fire lane no parking. PRIOR TO CDB g , Provide minimum 30 degree turning radii for emergency vehicle ingress and egress. PRIOR TO CDB. J Harbor Master: 1 . No issues, Legal: 1 . No issues. J Land Resources: 1 _ No Issues. La dscaping: 1 . Provide a plant key (symbol or label) 2 . Per Section 3-1204.H. Plants in the sight triangles must be installed in accordance with the requirements in Article 3, Division 9 to minimize traffic hazards. There are three Grand Crinim Lilies proposed within the visibility triangle on the west side of the western driveway on Druid Road that exceed the height requirement. Revise. Per Section 3-1202.B.1 -Code requires trees to be 10' in height and 2 1/2" cal. at planting, ornamental trees can be 8' in height and 2" cal., and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at planting. Revise the Plant List on Sheet L-1. S~ ~ ~ ~,.. ~ ~'~^ , ~,~.,~. ~ (~.~ (~41, Ensure the landscaping proposed in close proximity to the proposed sign on Myrtle Avenue 11~~....~~// does not block views of the sign. Revise. J 5 . Provide on Sheet A-1 the dimension of the foundation landscape area on the south side of the building. Code requires five feet. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues. Stormwater: 1 . No Issues Solid Waste: 1 , No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Remove any objects within the sight distance triangles that exceed :30" in height from ground level. 2. Proposed fence must also meet sight visibility requirements. 3. Will this include a gate? If so, show on site plan a detail of location and operation (please dimension location). 4. Provide do not enter, one-way signage, and stop signs where appropriate per current M.U.T.C.D.. 5. Paint white directional arrows on the ground for better internal ciruclation for motorists. 6. All regular parking spaces and wheel stops must be in white paint. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 30, 2005 -Page 48 k ~ 1 . f 2 . A separate sign permit will be required for the proposed sign shown on Sheet A-3. 6/9105 - W W Comprehensive Landscape Program must list all the modifications or reductions requested, as well as providing justification for these modifications or reductions through the responses to criteria. 612/05 - W W It is assumed that the value of improvements or remodelling exceeds 25 percent of the value of the building, according to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. As such, parking and landscaping must be brought into full compliance with Code provisions. With only 3.8 percent of the vehicular use area being provided in interior landscaping, a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Road (south} (10 feet required; five feet provided), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line (10 feet required; five feet provided}, a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line (five feet required; zero feet provided) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east (adjacent to the existing office building) (five feet required; zero feet provided), need to submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application to request such, providing the justification for these reductions. 3 . Provide the project value with the proposed improvements. ~ A Minor Lot Adjustment must be submitted to the Planning Department, approved and recorded y ~~y~~'~/ ' ~ prior to the issuance of any permits for improvements under this FLD approval. This will also l U ong require the recording of a Unity of Title for the subject property (Planning will prepare a with the Minor Lot Adjustment paperwork). h `~ ~ 7 ree Maximum height offence along north property line in the front setback of Myrtle Avenue is t C~J,~ / ~/ 6 . feet. Revise. General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide a detailed response to show how this proposal "will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings" or "significantly impair the value" of adjacent land and buildings. 7 . General Applicability criteria #4 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposal will "minimize traffic congestion." J 8 . General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposal will be "consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity." Provide details regarding J landscape improvements. f hi 9 . t s General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a detailed response as to the hours of operation o use. Provide in the response the dumpster enclosure improvements proposed. h 10 . ow Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Provide a detailed response as to this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and J development standards," including setback reductions. h i 1 . ow Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - Provide a detailed response as to this proposal "will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties." 12 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposal °design...creates aform and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a f 13 . whole." Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - Provide a detailed response as to how flexibility for this proposal "in regard to lot width, required setbacks and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 8/16/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing ail above departments' comments by noon, 7/7/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled. as appropriate. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 30, 2005 -Page 49 ~ ~D~ Case Number: FLD2005-05046 -- 700 DRUID RD 2:35 pm Owner(s): Religious Community Services I ~' ~, ~ 1855 Highland Ave S Clearwater, Fi 33756 ~~~~ TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Jay Myers 9170 Oakhurst Road Seminole, FI 33776 TELEPHONE: 727-595-7100, FAX: 727-595-7138, E-MAIL: myersarch@ix.netcom.com Location: 1.064 acres located on the north side of Druid Road, approximately 150 feet east of Myrtle Avenue. and on the west side of Myrtle Avenue, approximately 200 feet north of Druid Road. Atlas Page: 295B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing social/public service agency with a reduction to lot width from 100 feet to 58 feet (along Myrtle Avenue), a reduction to the front (south along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to five feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Avenue) setback from 25 feet to I S feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Road (south) from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement}, a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.4 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: SociaUpublic service agencies Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Downs-Blackburn Applicant: Jay Myers, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. A separate right-of--way permit will be required for all work within the right-of--way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727}562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). Environmental: 1 , No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 30, 2005 -Page 48 1 . This DRC Review b Fire is not an a royal or review of any constion plans or documents Y pP other than site work. 2 , Provide a fire hydrant within 300 feet of most remote point of the building. 3 . Application indicated renovation of existing building. Renovation may require the addition of fire sprinkler system and the underground fire water supply line to facilitate the fire sprinkler system. Provide addditional information PRIOR TO CDB. 4 . If building is to be protected by a fire sprinkler system the FDC must be located at least 15 feet from the building and within 40 feet of the fire hydrant. Please address this comment PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . If building is to be protected by a fire sprinkler system, ali undergrowid water mains and hydrants must be installed, tested and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please address this comment PRIOR TO CDB. (. Driveways to be minimum 24 ft for ingress and egress of emergency vehicles. PRIOR TO CDB. 7 . The rear parking lot is in excess of 150 ft in length. Provide fire department turnaround, Y, T, or cul-de-sac. If either of the two driveways on the east or west side of the building are to be used as a means of egress for emergency vehicles from the rear parking lot it must be a minimum 20 ft wide, exclusive of curbing, landscaping, parking spaces, etc., and must have signage indicating fire lane no parking. PRIOR TO CDB g . Provide minimum 30 degree turning radii for emergency vehicle ingress and egress. PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: i . No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . Provide a plant key (symbol or label) 2 , Per Section 3-1204.H. Plants in the sight triangles must be installed in accordance with the requirements in Article 3, Division 9 to minimize traffic hazards. There are three Grand Crinim Lilies proposed within the visibility triangle on the west side of the western driveway on Druid Road that exceed the height requirement. Revise. 3 , Per Section 3-1202.B.1 -Code requires trees to be 10' in height and 2 1/2" cal. at planting, ornamental trees can be 8' in height and 2" cal., and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at planting. Revise the Plant List on Sheet L-1. 4 . Ensure the landscaping proposed in close proximity to the proposed sign on Myrtle Avenue does not block views of the sign. Revise. 5 . Provide on Sheet A-1 the dimension of the foundation landscape area on the south side of the building. Code requires five feet. Parks and Recreation: No issues. Stormwater: 1 . No Issues Solid Waste: 1 . No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Remove any objects within the sight distance triangles that exceed 30" in height from ground level. 2. Proposed fence must also meet sight visibility requirements. 3. Will this include a gate? If so, show on site plan a detail of location and operation (please dimension location). 4. Provide do not enter, one-way signage, and stop signs where appropriate per current M.U.T.C.D.. 5. Paint white directional arrows on the ground for better internal ciruclation for motorists. 6. All regular parking spaces and wheel stops must be in white paint. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 30, 2005 -Page 49 1 . A separate sign pernut will be required for the proposed sign shown•heet A-3. 2 . 6/9/05 - WW Comprehensive Landscape Program must list all the modifications or reductions requested, as well as providing justification for these modifications or reductions through the responses to criteria. 6/2/05 - W W It is assumed that the value of improvements or remodelling exceeds 2S percent of the value of the building, according to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser. As such, parking and landscaping must be brought into full compliance with Code provisions. With only 3.8 percent of the vehicular use area being provided in interior landscaping, a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Road (south) (10 feet required; five feet provided), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line (10 feet required; five feet provided), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line (five feet required; zero feet provided) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east (adjacent to the existing office building) (five feet required; zero feet provided), need to submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application to request such, providing the justification for these reductions. 3 . Provide the project value with the proposed improvements. 4 . A Minor Lot Adjustment must be submitted to the Planning Department, approved and recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for improvements under this FLD approval. This will also require the recording of a Unity of Title for the subject property (Planning will prepare along with the Minor Lot Adjustment paperwork). 5 . Maximum height of fence along north property line in the front setback of Myrtle Avenue is three feet. Revise. 6 . General Applicability criteria #2 - Provide a detailed response to show how this proposal "will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings" or "significantly impair the value" of adjacent land and buildings. 7 . General Applicability criteria #4 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposal will "minimize traffic congestion," 8 . General Applicability criteria #5 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposal will be "consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity." Provide details regarding landscape improvements. 9 . General Applicability criteria #6 - Provide a detailed response as to the hours of operation of this use. Provide in the response the dumpster enclosure improvements proposed. 10 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards," including setback reductions. 11 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposal "will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties." 12 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 - Provide a detailed response as to how this proposal "design...creates aform and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." 13 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - Provide a detailed response as to how flexibility for this proposal "in regard to lot width, required setbacks and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 8/16/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 7/7/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, June 30, 2005 -Page 50 ~---~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ , . , ~ Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. ~~5-~.5~0~{ly _ Meeting Date: ~ ~~~ ~ Location: `~~~ ~ ~<,1~ ~~~ ^ Current Use: Active Code Enforcement Case eyes: e-Address number (~~~(no) (vacant land) p~'Landscaping (yes) ~~ ~ Overgrown (yes) ,a'" Debris (yes) ,a-'inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) no ~uilding(s) (good fair (poor) (vacant land) ra''~encing (none) oo (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) mint (good fair (poor) (garish) ~rass Parking (yes) ~sidential Parking Violations (yes) no r~ignage (none) ok) of ok) (billboard) marking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) Sb S6 ,a-'Dempster (enclose not enclo Outdoor storage (yes) no CommentslStatus Report (attach any pertinent documents): ~ `~1 d.® ,~ r.,,l v_ ~,,r- .a ~~usTRutT/off A!r« Date: Reviewed by: Telephone: Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 Pinellas County Property App~er Information: 15 29 15 54450 026 0~ Page 2 of 5 15 l 29 / 15 1 54450 / 024 / 4010 02-Jun-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:35:47 Ownership Information Hon-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES IHC OBK: 13430 OPG: 2411 503 ML KIMG JR AUE S # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33756 EVACUATION ZONE: NONE Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 700 DRU ID RD of Jan 1, 2004, based on Gensus Tract: 259.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book~Page Price {QualJUnG!) Vac~Imp Plat Information 3 /2,004 13,43012,411 1,600,000 {M7 I 1914: Book 003 Pgs 043- 0 JO 0/ 0 0 { } 1913: Book 001 Pgs 070- 0 /0 O! 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 Ol 0 0 { } 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 565,000 Homestead: HO Ownership ~ .000 Govt Exem: NO Use ~: .000 Assessed/Cap: 565,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt ~: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 565,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 12,977.71 1} 0 x 0 6.50 46,443.15 S Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 12, 977.71 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be : 12, 977. 71 Short Legal MAGNOLIA PARK BLK 26, P T OF LOTS 1,2,3, Description 4,5 & 8 & ALL OF LOTS 9 & 10 ALL DESC BEG SW COR LOT Building Information httpa/pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r--.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/2/2005 ti Pin~ilas County Property App~er Information: 15 29 1 S 54450 026 0~ Page 3 of 5 Property_and_Land Use C.o_de descriptions 15 ~' 29 ~ 15 / ~~44~0 I +~~~ / 0010 :01 02-Jun-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:35:58 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Pre-Engineered Metal Property Rddress: 700 DRUID RD Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 75 ~-Cruc-Cura1 E1~m~n-Cs Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior lJall Prefinished Metal Height Factor 20 Party lJall None Structural Frame Rigid Frame Raaf Frame Steel Truss & Purlin Roof Cover Corrugated Metal Cabinet & Mill Hone Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish None Total Units 0 Heating & Rir None Fixtures 9 Bath Tile Mane Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Fair Year Built 1,970 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciat:ian 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Oeprec:iation 0 dub Aromas Description Factor Rrea Description Factor Area 1} Base Area i. 00 9, 000 7} . 00 0 2} Open Porch .40 264 $} .00 0 3} Sales Service Area 1.50 3,000 9} .00 0 4} Canopy .20 480 10} .00 0 5} .00 0 11} .00 0 6} .00 0 12} .00 0 +Comm~rcial Extra Fsa-Cur~s Description Dimensions Price. Units 'Value RCD Year 1} ASPHALT 20X250 1.50 5,000 7,500 7,500 999 2} LOFT 6420 10.00 6,420 64,200 30,170 1,970 3} .00 0 0 0 0 4} .00 0 0 0 0 5} .00 0 0 0 0 ~} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD 'WALUE: 37,670 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/2/2005 Pinellas County Property App~er Information: 15 29 15 54450 026 0~ Page 4 of 5 ~~~~ C~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~T~E P ~( vE ~~ ~3 ~~c~ DF~~iIC~ F' D ~~ 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pineilas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/2/2005 Pinellas County Property App~er Information: 15 29 15 54450 026 0~ Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information :Back. to.._Search.:Page_ An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &Y=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 6/2/2005 • • -- Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne, ' Sent: ~ Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:21 AM To: Jay Myers (E-mail) Cc: Gerlock, Frank; Fierce, Lisa; Tarapani, Cyndi Subject: RCS Food Pantry, 700 Druid Road Jay - On October 16, 2001, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with one condition (related to signage) Case FL 01-08-27 to permit asocial/public service agency with the Commercial District at 700 Druid Road. The proposal included locating the Religious Community Services Food Pantry to the subject site within an existing one-story, 12,000 square-foot metal building. The area of the Scotty's site requested was a 154-foot area along Druid Road by 267 feet of depth, basically back to the next building to the north of the subject 12,000 square-foot metal building. Based on three spaces per 1,000 square feet, 36 parking spaces would have been required to be provided. Based on four spaces per 1,000 square feet, 48 parking spaces would have been required. While not specifically enumerated as a parking space reduction as part of the request, the staff report indicated that 30 spaces would be provided on-site and 10 additional at St. Cecilia's Church (total of 40 spaces). The proposal also included removing seven parking spaces on the front (south) property line along Druid Road to provide afive-foot landscape buffer and providing a second planting area at the southwest corner of the site. With this application, the abandoned, nonconforming, freestanding sign along the front (south) property line along Druid Road was to be removed (which it was). Future signage will meet Code. The building was to be repainted light blue. The parking lot was to be repaved as necessary and restriped to include 30 parking spaces. 1 have to "assume" that all of the above was accomplished. This being said, based on our discussions last week and the drawing you left me, should RCS desire to purchase the entire Scotty's property and then sell off the northern portion, the following will help provide direction: 1. Anew Flexible Development application will be required to be filed expanding the area for the social/public service agency out to Myrtle Avenue. I have not sensed at this time any major staff concern with expanding this site to provide additional parking, given the concerns listed in this email. This expanded area would be to provide additional parking. The new lot line desired to be created will need to be shown, to be able to sell off the northern area for future development. A new survey of the area to be requested would need to be submitted (suggestion, lets make sure of the direction you are going in relation to parking/landscaping before we agree to where the new lot line will be proposed). The side (north) setback required to this new northern property line is 10 feet (however, through the Flexible Development application, the side setback could be requested to be reduced down to as little as zero feet). This side setback must be applied to both sides of the new lot line (the RCS side and that northern area desired to be sold off for future development to another entity). On the northern area to be sold off, it is strongly suggested to peel back the pavement (and remove the building) to 10 feet from the new lot line (to avoid having to ask for a reduction on that side). The front (east) setback from Myrtle Avenue (to pavement) is recommended not to be less than 15 feet (and since a cross access with the property to be sold off is potentially desired, figure the 15 feet setback + 19-foot long parking space [facing Myrtle] as to the location of the cross access). Since the site has frontages along three rights-of-way, you may want to look at all setbacks (front and side, along all property lines} as to what improvements could be made. As to number of parking spaces, it is recommended to get as close to the four spaces per 1,000 square feet (48 spaces on-site) as possible, to avoid having to rely on shared/peak use parking with St. Cecelia's Church. It is noted that as part of the review of the RCS proposal to move to 405 North Myrtle Avenue, that a staff site visit indicated that this site (700 Druid Road} had some parking problems (even with the St. Cecelia's Church shared/peak parking). 2. In order to create the new lot line officially, which would be after the CDB decides the Flexible Development case, a Release of Unity of Title would need to be submitted to Planning (letter, staff decision), and a Minor Lot Adjustment (MLR) requested (since the new lot line will not be according to the existing platted lot lines). The MLA is a staff-only process and involves surveys. As part of this process, new Unity of Titles will be required for the two, "new" lots (RCS and the northern lot to be sold off). 3. Facade improvements -The Code states that if improvements are made that are 25 percent or more of the value of the principal structure (RCS) as reflected on the Property Appraiser's Office records, then the site must be brought into full compliance with Code parking and landscaping requirements. Suggestion, include such as part of the Flexible Development request so that any reductions could be handled as part of the request. I hope this provides the necessary information you desired. Should you have additional questions, or need clarification on the information presented above, feel free to contact me at 562-4504. Wayne CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Eiorida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, August 16, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishinE to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinE. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont from 07-19-OS} Home EnerEV, LLC. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 144.63 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 feet (to patios) and from 10 ft to 8 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (south} setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios} and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement}, a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 43.17 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 5.5 ft (from roof deck) and an additional 13.67 ft for an open rooftop pavilion (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F, with reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios} and from 10 ft to 8 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [4 townhomes and 16 condominiums]) at 415 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 17 and part of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-04035 2. (font from 07-19-OS) Beach & Gulf Sands, Inc., & North Clearwater Beach Development (Anthony Menna) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings in the Tourist District and an increase in ht from 35 ft to 64 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches, permit 2 parking spaces within the required sight visibility triangles along Bay Esplanade, a reduction in the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and 3 ft (to trash staging area), reduction in the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), 10 ft (to pool) and 7 ft (to building), reduction in the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 feet (to trash staging area) and a reduction the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 8 ft (to pool) and 10 ft (to building), as part of a Comprehensive Infiil Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C., Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03019) of 2 dwelling units from 116 Brightwater Dr (donor site} to 657 Bay Esplanade (receiver site) under the provisions of Sec's 4- 1402 and 4-1403 and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity under the provisions of Sec 6-109. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [13 condominium units]) at 657 & 663 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLDZ005-03032/TDR2005-03019 3. Religious Community Services, Inc. (The Haven of RCS) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a white PVC fence 6 ft in ht within the front (east) setback along North Saturn Ave without substantial grill work and masonry columns and without a 3 foot wide • • landscape strip on the street side of the fence as otherwise required by See's 3-804.A.1 and 3 on a property within the Medium Density Residential (MDR} district, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-304.G. (Proposed Use: Community Residential homes) at 1520 N Saturn Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 44.01. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05038 4. Ardent International Ltd Liability Co, Panayiotis Vasiloudes, and Helen Vasiloudes (M3B Development, LLC/Robert Szasz) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings in the Tourist District, an increase in ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wail from 30 inches to 42 inches and a reduction the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft to pool deck and 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 651 & 65S Bav Esplanade and 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Repiat Blk 77, Lots 1-3. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 5. TSE TSE, LLC (M3B Development, LLClRobert Szasz) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings in the Tourist District, an increase in ht from 35 ft to 58 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches and a reduction the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 3.33 ft to pool deck and 6 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 629, b35 & 637 Bav Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Repiat Blk 78, Lots 8-1 I & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05044 . 6. First Baptist Church of Clearwater (Opus South Corporation, Opus South Contractor's LLC/John Franklin Wade) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow amixed-use development of 157 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 31 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 10,022 sq ft of non-residential use, with an increase to the permitted ht from 30 ft to 271 ft (to roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments and mechanical equipment (from roof deck), to reduce the non-residential parking requirement from 41 parking spaces to zero (0) parking spaces, and to allow a building within the required sight visibility triangle at the intersection of Cleveland St and North Osceola Ave, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C., and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along N Osceola Ave, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Mixed-use [ 169 attached dwellings and 10,022 sq ft non- residential floor area]) at 331 Cleveland St, John R Davey's Resub Blk A, Part of Lots 1-3 & unplatted parcel. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05048 7. Clearwater Land Ltd {Druid Courtyard Clearwater, LLC/Nicholas F Ferraioli) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 47 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north} setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to entry feature columns) and from 25 ft to 18.5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front {west) setback from 25 ft to 4 ft (to entry feature columns) and from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement and pool deck), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to entry feature column), a reduction to the side (south} setback from 10 ft to 1.9 ft {to entry feature column} and an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 55 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets, under the provisions of Sec 2-504.A. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [47 condominiums]) at ll05 Druid Rd, Sec 15-29-15, M&B 34.03. Assigned Planner: Wayne Ivl. Wells, AICP. FLD2005-05037 \_J • • 8. Religious Community Services, Inc. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing social/public service agency with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 58 ft (along Myrtle Ave), a reduction to the front (south along Druid Rd) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Ave) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west} setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Inlill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Rd (south) from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.4 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Expansion and renovation of the RCS food bank) at 700 Druid Rd, Magnolia Park, Blk 26, Lots 9 & 10 & parts of Lots 1-5 & 8. Assigned Planner:'.. a~ IVT. W~l~, A~~~'P, Planner III. FLD2005-05046 9. Ronald and Karen Kozan (Newkirk Ventures, Inc.) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (26 existing and proposed attached dwelling units; 20 dwelling units maximum under land use category), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 26 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 144.65 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to building) from 25 ft to 20 ft (to balcony), from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6.1 ft (to balconies) and from 10 ft to 5.4 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 6.1 ft (to balconies) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building height from 30 ft to 46 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 6 ft (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F, and reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to 5.4 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [26 condominiums]) at 405 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 15 and part of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05045 10. Camille Courtney & Elina Honiclcy (Henry C. Kyle, III & Robert Elder) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow an addition to an existing single-family residence with a reduction to the front setback from 25 ft to 20.3 ~ft (to building), under the provisions of Sec 2- 304.G. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 1415 San Juan Court, Blvd Heights, Blk K, Lot 17 and part of Lot 18. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner L FLD2005-05052 11. DiVello Land Trust, Fulvio DiVello Trustee (Maddalina DiVello & Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (111 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 83 dwelling units), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 83 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south along S. Gulfview Blvd.) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (west along Hamden Dr) from 15 ft to 12.5 ft (to building and proposed pavement), from IS ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) from 10 ft to 3 ft (to existing pavement) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter • • parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22.5 ft for elevator and stair towers (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.0. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [83 condominiums]) at 445 Hamden Dr and 504 S Gulfview Blvd, Columbia Sub No. 5, Lots 4-11, and RIP rts and land adj to Lot 11. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05051 12. TW/Beach Residences -Clearwater, LLC (E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP} are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 112 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today}, under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units, 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 sq ft of retail sales with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 6 ft (to patioslseating areas) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from l0 ft to 5 ft from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to trash staging area}, a reduction to the rear (west} setback from 20 ft to 8 ft from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 ft 100 ft for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 ft to 150 ft for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck} and an additional 24 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 ft to 90 ft and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of 4 dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Ave, 2 dwelling units from 625-627 Bay Esplanade, 2 dwelling units from 665 Bay Esplanade and 3 dwelling units • from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Mixed use of 112 attached dwellings [condominiums), 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 sq ft of retail sales) at 430 South Gulfview Blvd Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub, Lots 33-35, part of Lot 36 and subm land on W. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005-05022 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. • • Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.n1. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR RE(aUEST. Ad: 07/31 JOS :~ • FLD2,005-0 ;046 = 79 A E M ERFAHRUNG LLC 1000 BRICKELL AVE # 920 MIAMI FL 33131 - 3047 AUSTIN MEDICAL CTR INC 3389 CLARINE WAY E DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9439 BLEHERT, M BLEHERT TR BLEHERT, PAMELA COULTER TR 11919 MOSS POINT LN RESTON VA 20194 - 1728 r I i ~AMSOUTH BANK 3000 GALLERIA TOWER STE 1 BIRMINGHAM AL 35244 - 2332 BATT, HOWARD C 611 DRUID RD E # 712 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3931 BROWN, MICHAEL BROWN, MARIA 327 WILDWOOD WAY BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 2006 ~ASHRAF, BESSADA DMP PA 3184 CRESCENT OAKS BLVD TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - BAY REAL ESTATE INVESTORS WEISS, MARY L THE 2040 NE COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2614 CARPENTER, JANA Q THE 612 HARBOR IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1801 CARRINGTON & CARRINGTON PA CLEARWATER MM INVESTMENT CO CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS 619 TURNER ST 12813 WILD ACRES RD COALITION CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5314 LARGO FL 33773 - 1517 DOUG WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33761 CREDITIQ INC 611 DRUID RD E # 405 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CSX TRANSPORTATION INC 500 WATER ST JACKSONVILLE FL 32202 - 4423 DEXTER PROPERTIES 612 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG PO BOX 40200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33743 - 0200 DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3948 FERRARA TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS 611 DRUID RD E # 704 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939 GEESLIN, KRISTIN 810 PINE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5620 DIRTY NELLIE'S REAL ESTATE COR 809 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5601 DYER, EVERETT C II 812 PINE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - FIFTY OAKS REALTY LLC 1173 LONG BOW LN CLEARWATER FL 33764 - GERUM, MARY E 430 MAPLE ST WISC RAPIDS WI 23185 - 3184 DRUHILL PROF CTR CONDO ASSN DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - FKMS 509 HARBOR DR BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3253 FULLER, JOYCE E THE 639 PONCE DE LEON BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1018 HAROLD COURT TOWNHOMES LLC 2506 S MAC DILL AVE TAMPA FL 33629 - 7218 HAUSE, BRUCE HEYE, HANS F JAY MYERS, AIR MONAS, CAROL N 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 9170 OAKHURST ROAD 700 SOUTH PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 SEMINOLE, FL 33776 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5630 JOHNSON, ALAN L JONES, DAVID L 703 S MYRTLE AVE JONES, REBECCA R CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5617 702 S PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5630 KEDAN, ELITE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 KEDAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 KOHRS,DEAN 809 PINE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5619 LEONARD, LECLAIR 708 S PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5630 MACHAN, EMMA V MACHAN, KENNETH C 610 S PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5628 MC CLURE, MICHAEL W MC CLURE, SANDRA K 2210 DONATO DR BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3433 NACOL, T PATRICK NACOL, BARBARA K 611 DRUID RD E # 711 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3931 PANTELIDES, GUS 611 DRUID RD E # 706 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3959 PHILLIPS, CRAIG PHILLIPS, PEGGY 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3948 LANDA, LUCIA 811 112 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5633 LITTLE E BRAVO 1428 LEMON ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2341 MANOR PROPERTIES INTERNATIONAL 413 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - MS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC 926 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33779 - 1773 NEI INC 5146 KERNWOOD CT PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3617 PERFECTLY BALANCED BOOKS INC 611 DRUID RD E # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3920 PHILLIPS, J WAYNE PHILLIPS, BRIDGET M 2811 SABER DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1122 KACHMAR INVESTMENT CO LLC 252 HEYEDT SCHOOLHOUSE RD BECHTELSVILLE PA 19505 - 9120 KINDER, ERNESTINE R 704 S PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5630 LEAP E BRAVO 1428 LEMON ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2341 LUKE, RALPH LUKE, RACHEL 811 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5601 MAYS, REBECCA J 12813 WILD ACRES RD LARGO FL 33773 - 1517 MYRTLE CARE 780 OAK RIDGE LN BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL 33770 - 1 746 PANTELIDES, GUS K 611 DRUID RD # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939 PHILLIPS, CRAIG S PHILLIPS, PEGGY L 3716 MCKAY CREEK DR LARGO FL 33770 - 4566 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 QUARTETTI, RALPH W R O E C CLUB INC R V S 11 INC QUARTETTI, BERNADINE J 607 INDIANA AVE 8800 BARDMOOR BLVD # 11 2040 MICHIGAN AVE NE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5306 LARGO FL 33777 - 2212 ST PETERSBURG FL 33703 - 3408 s RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES I ROBINSON, A G 1855 HIGHLAND AVE S ROBINSON, ANN S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1750 707 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3951 SABBIDES, CHARLES D SABBIDES, SHIRLEY A PO BOX 389 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0389 SCHAFER,STEPHEN R 2268 BEN LOMOND DR LOS ANGELES CA 90027 - 2905 SERENITY CLUB CLEARWATER INC 631 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5314 SZABO,BRUCE 611 DRUID RD E STE 717 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947 VISION ARCHITECTURE &DEV 338 N BAY HILLS BLVD SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 4905 WORK & SON KRAEER HOLDINGS INC 18016 VILLA CREEK DR TAMPA FL 33647 - 2596 SHAMSAH, H SHIDI TRUST 611 DRUID RD E STE 301 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - TULLY, JOE TULLY, CYNTHIA 611 DRUID RD # 407 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3935 WELLS COURT DEV LLC 401 CORBETT ST # 110 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - i RODRIGUEZ, ROSALIA C 418 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2309 SEABLOOM, CLARK G JR SEABLOOM, MARGARET K 411 CLEVELAND ST PMB # 240 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 SHAUGHNESSY, PATRICK J HAYNES,SHERYLM PO BOX 1773 LARGO FL 33779 - 1773 TWEAN SUBSIDIARY PO BOX 4739 SYRACUSE NY 13221 - 4739 WILLIAMS, ROBERT M III 5020 COUNTY ROAD 316A BUSHNELL FL 33755 -3406