The URL can be used to link to this page

FEDERAL GRANTS TO FLORIDA'S LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 1 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments The Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations June 2008 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (As of November 2007) Legislative Members Gubernatorial Appointees Senator Anthony Hill, Sr., Chair Joanna L. Cunningham District 1 Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District Representative Faye Culp, Alternating-Chair Sue Hershey District 57 Martin County School Board Senator Alex Diaz de la Portilla Kelly Layman District 36 Department of Environmental Protection Representative Ed Hooper Councilman Herbert Polson District 50 City of St. Petersburg Senator Steve Oelrich Lisa Saliba District 14 Governor's Office of Policy and Budget Representative Juan-Carlos Planas Commissioner Cynthia Stevenson District 115 Saint Johns County Commission Senator Gary Siplin Commissioner Robert Stewart District 19 Pinellas County Commission Representative James Waldman District 95 Alton L. "Rip" Colvin, Jr. - Executive Director What is the LCIR? The Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (LCIR) is a legislative entity that facilitates the development of intergovernmental policies and practices. The Florida LCIR strives to improve coordination and cooperation among state agencies, local governments, and the federal government. What Issues Have Been Addressed by the LCIR? The LCIR completes several publications annually, including the Local Government Financial Information Handbook, Finalized Salaries of County Constitutional Officers and Elected School District Officials, and Intergovernmental Impact Report (Mandates and Measures Affecting Local Government Fiscal Capacity). In addition, the LCIR has addressed the following issues: o Municipal Incorporations and Annexation o State, Regional, and Local Planning o Impact Fees o Voting by Mail o Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response and o Economic Development Recovery o Affordable Housing a Local Government Financial Emergencies o Federal Funds to Florida o Urban Infill & Infrastructure Capacity o Federal/State Relations If you would like additional copies of this report or if you have comments or questions pertaining to the information contained herein, please contact the LCIR at (850) 488-9627. We welcome your input or suggestions. Our mailing address is: Florida LCIR c/o Legislative Mail Services Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1300 Homepage: http://www.floridalcir.gov 1 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments June 2008 ' Prepared by the Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations iI Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Executive Summary This report by the Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (LCIR) examines certain federal grants to local governments. Federal grants are an important source of funding to local governments, but appear to have stagnated or decreased in recent years. Whether the type of grant is formula, competitive, block or otherwise, the last several years have seen an overall decrease in federal grant funds to state and local governments. As state and local fiscal resources continue to diminish, local governments will need to become more aggressive and creative in pursuing federal funds. By providing a thorough analysis of federal grants to local governments and offering data with which local governments can compare their performance with neighboring localities and similarly situated local governments, the LCIR seeks to assist local governments in increasing their draw-down of federal grant funds. 1. Background on Grants Grants from the federal government, whether in cash or land, have been handed down to local communities since the establishment of this nation. How grants are made available, funded, awarded, and administered, has changed over the centuries. The six years of Lyndon Johnson's presidency saw more grant programs initiated than the previous 200 years combined. Beginning in the 1980s, many grant programs were ' changed from entitlement grants to block grants and additional federal control was exercised. The 1980s also saw an effort by President Ronald Reagan, and subsequently by many states, to establish a Single Point of Contact (SPOC) at the state level for local grant applications to be reviewed. Some states have established a SPOC, others have not, while still others operate their SPOC in a manner unique to that state. In Florida, the SPOC is housed in the Department of Environmental Protection. Based on a review of the function of that review process and approaches used by other states, considering some changes to that particular process may be warranted at this time. 11. One Stop Shop for Grants In years past, finding, applying for, and managing federal grants was a time consuming and arduous task for local governments. Those difficulties, even for local governments with limited resources, should be lessened considerably by the federal government's implementation of an interactive website, www.Grants.gov. Under the Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act of 1999, the federal government's 26 agencies are required to post all available grants through a centralized website, www.Grants.gov. Using FY 2005 data, this means access to more than 1,000 programs representing almost $470 billion available in federal financial assistance can be accessed from one website. Local governments are urged to take advantage of all this website has to offer. III. Survey LCIR staff surveyed local governments for information regarding how local governments find and apply Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations for grants, whether consultants are used, what barriers exist to securing more grant funds, and general comments on the grant process. Although the response rate was not high, LCIR staff did glean from the responses that local governments would benefit from having more staff devoted to grants and having better access to grant information in general. LCIR staff also concluded that better utilization of www.Gr_ants.gov was imperative to improved draw-down of federal grant funds by local governments. Table 1: Adjusted Expenditures by Countv Governments Count 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami-Dade $808,601,414 1 Palm Beach $282,063,223 3 Broward $280,485,213 2 Hillsborough $211,989,540 4 Orange $175,851,985 5 Lee $113,903,044 8 Pinellas $102,777,545 6 Volusia $95,593,321 11 Polk $60,959,903 9 Brevard $46,368,448 10 IV. Data Used in this Report To see how local governments in Florida are faring relative to each other, LCIR staff had to create a new data set. It did so by using data from Federal Single Audits, filed in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendment of 1996 and required by OMB Circular A-133 "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations." Staff then filtered the expenditures to include only grants that local governments are eligible to apply for, and then adjusted that to reflect the role of disaster mitigation and recovery efforts by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) due to the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. This resulted in two critical observations. First, staff recognized that the "FEMA Effect," which totals more than $2.5 billion, masked a trend of stagnation or moderate growth from all other federal grants. Second, upon the removal of the "FEMA Effect," total expenditures are greatest for the largest counties (see Table 1) and municipalities (see Table 2). Per capita expenditures are generally greater for smaller counties and municipalities. Table 2: Adjusted Expenditures by Municipal Governments Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami $200,085,108 2 Jacksonville $122,255,861 1 Tama $95,076,811 3 Fort Lauderdale $73,374,030 8 Tallahassee $66,328,462 7 Orlando $45,921,080 6 Hialeah $43,825,091 5 West Palm Beach $40,896,602 19 Saint Petersburg $38,750,807 4 Gainesville $33,879,690 14 V. Recommendations and Conclusion The LCIR issues an annual report assessing Florida's receipt of federal funds. That report enumerates a series of recommendations for the state to pursue in order to increase its share of federal dollars. Some of those recommendations are listed below in a form tailored for local governments, as well as new recommendations. ii Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations A. Recommendations Local governments should take the following steps to increase their receipt of federal grant funds: • Register with www.Grants.gov and take full advantage of all this interactive website has to offer. • As www.Grants.gov continues to evolve, local governments should provide the website with feedback on issues that could bear improvement, such as timeframes, and uniformity of application processes and forms. • Collaborate with other local governments and regional entities to explore meeting eligibility requirements of certain grants. • Using data posted on the LCIR's website, www.floridalcir.gov_, local governments can compare themselves with neighboring or similarly situated local governments to ascertain whether they are taking full advantage of all available grant opportunities. • Once suitable grants have been identified, local government staff should develop a direct rapport with personnel from the granting agency through phone and e-mail contact whenever possible. • Conduct cost-benefit analyses to assess the fiscal value of hiring one or more grant-writers. • Identify federal and state policy changes needed to enhance Florida's access to federal funding streams. • Support state efforts to form coalitions with similarly-situated states to pursue changes in outdated or inequitable federal funding formulas. • Work with the state and Congress to implement changes to federal funding formulas determined to be outdated or inequitable. • Vigorously pursue increased availability of state matching funds or other locally available funds, using a variety of resources, including those listed in Appendix F. • Invest in training provided at the state and local levels for accessing federal (and state) grant funding. • Increase communication and coordination on federal funding issues among state agencies, the Governor's office, the Florida Washington Office, the Legislature, and the Congressional Delegation using, among others, the resources listed in Appendix F, where appropriate. • When competing with local governments from other states for non-formula grants, enlist assistance from Congressional Offices, who are typically able to provide letters of support. The Department of Environmental Protection may wish to consider: • Advocating for amendment to Governor's Executive Order 95- 359 to clarify and streamline the role and function of the Single Point of Contact housed in the Department of Environmental Protection, and any appropriate statutory changes to s. 403.061(40), F.S. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments iii Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations • Alternatively, evaluating the benefit to the state and local governments of the SPOC and determining whether the SPOC should be dispensed with or maintained. B. Conclusion It is clear that current economic conditions warrant local governments maximizing all potential funding sources. In response to Congressional direction, the federal government established www,Grants.gov, an interactive website that makes it easier for local governments, and others, to pursue federal grants. Local governments are advised to take advantage of this resource to the fullest extent. Additionally, the LCIR, in conjunction with other governmental associations, continues to make concerted efforts to reach out to local governments through newsletters, web links, and other means, to ensure that information regarding federal grants is shared with as many localities as possible. Finally, LCIR staff will provide updates to this report as data becomes available and will identify specific topics for further analysis. iv Pederal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Table of Contents Page No. Introduction ................................................................................................1 Chapter One: History ................................................................................3 A. Background .........................................................................................................................3 B. History of Grants .................................................................................................................. 3 C. Types of Grants and Other Forms of Federal Assistance ................................................... 5 D. Why Grants Matter .............................................................................................................. 7 E. Revenue Sources for Local Governments ........................................................................... 8 F. State and Federal Economic Realities ................................................................................ 9 G. Changes in the Grants Realm ...........................................................................................11 1. Single Point of Contact ..................................................................................................11 2. www.Grants.gov ............................................................................................................13 Chapter Two: Fiscal Data .......................................................................15 A. Introduction to Potential Data Sources ..............................................................................15 B. Survey ...............................................................................................................................16 C. Data Used in this Report ...................................................................................................18 D. Unadjusted Grant Expenditures by Local Governments ...................................................19 1 1. County Governments ............ ........................................................................................20 2 2. Municipal Governments .................................................................................................23 E. Grants by Agency ..............................................................................................................31 F. "FEMA Effect ...................................................................... .............. .......... ........................ 34 G. Adjusted Grant Expenditures by Local Governments ........................................................ 36 1. County Governments ..................................................................................................... 36 2. Municipal Governments .................................................................................................40 Chapter Three: Agency Totals By Local Government .........................49 A. Department of Homeland Security Award Expenditures ................................................... 50 1. County Governments .................................................................................................. 52 2. Municipal Governments ..............................................................................................53 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments . V Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations B. Department of Housing and Urban Development Award Expenditures ............................ 54 1. County Governments ..................................................... ........ 55 2. Municipal Governments ............................................................. .............................56 C. Department of Health and Human Services Award Expenditures .....................................57 1. County Governments .................................................................. ................... .... 58 2. Municipal Governments .................................................................... ......................59 D. Department of Transportation Award Expenditures ..........................................................60 1. County Governments ...................................................................... ........--- 61 2. Municipal Governments ..............................................................................................61 E. Department of Justice Security Award Expenditures ........................... .. 63 1. County Governments .................................................................................................. 64 2. Municipal Governments ..............................................................................................65 Chapter Four: Grants by Type ............................................................... 67 A. Project Grants .................................................................................................................... 67 1. County Governments ..................................................................... 2. Municipal Governments ..............................................................................................69 B. Specific Project Grant Programs ....................................................................................... 70 1. Department of Homeland Security .............................................................................. 71 2. Department of Housing and Urban Development ........................................................ 72 3. Department of Health and Human Services ............................................................... 73 4. Department of Transportation ...................................................................................... 73 5. Department of Justice ..................................................................................................74 6. Environmental Protection Agency ..............................................................................74 7. Department of Agriculture ............................................................................................75 C. Formula Grants ..................................................................................................................75 1. County Governments .................................................................................................. 76 2. Municipal Governments ..............................................................................................77 D. Specific Formula Grant Programs ..................................................................................... 78 1. Department of Housing and Urban Development ........................................................ 79 2. Department of Transportation ...................................................................................... 81 3. Department of Health and Human Services ............................................................... 82 4. Department of Justice .................................................................................................. 82 Vi Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations E. Special Designations ......................................................................................................... 83 1. High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas ......................................................................... 83 2. USDA Rural Development .......................................................................................... 85 Chapter Five: Recommendations and Conclusion .............................. 89 A. Recommendations ............................................................................................................89 B. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................90 Index of Appendices ................................................................................ 91 Appendix A: Annual Unadjusted Expenditure Data .............................93 Counties ................................................................................................................................ 94 Municipalities --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•--.-----.......----.------------ 98 Appendix B: Annual Adjusted Expenditure Data ...............................111 ' Counties .............................................................................................................................112 Municipalities .....................................................................................................................116 r Appendix C: Annual Unadjusted Expenditure Data ...........................129 ' Department of Homeland Security .....................................................................................130 Counties ....................................................................................................................130 Municipalities ........................................................................ ... .............................. ....134 Department of Housing and Urban Development ..............................................................144 Counties ....................................................................................................................144 Municipalities .............................................................................................................146 Department of Health and Human Services ......................................... 152 Counties ....................................................................................................................152 Municipalities .............................................................................................................154 1 Department of Transportation ............................................................................................156 Counties ....................................................................................................................156 Municipalities ---------. • ..................................................................................................158 Department of Justice ........................................................................................................160 Counties ....................................................................................................................160 Municipalities .............................................................................................................164 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Vii Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Appendix D: Lexington, South Carolina Success Story ....................175 1 Appendix E: Survey Instrument ...........................................................179 Appendix F: Resource List ...................................................................185 Viii Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations ' Introduction This report by the Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (LCIR) examines certain federal grants to local governments. Federal grants are an important ' source of funding to local governments. Unfortunately, federal grants to local governments appear to have stagnated or decreased in recent years. As state and local fiscal resources continue to diminish, local governments will need to become more aggressive and creative in their pursuit of federal funds. In this report, LCIR staff follows the development of federal grants as a funding resource ' from the nation's earliest days to the present. - Various types of federal grants are introduced and then explained. Local government revenue sources are defined, and the role of grants is presented. Staff identifies challenges in the grants realm and ' concludes by offering recommendations. In order to conduct this project, LCIR staff had to create a unique data set containing grant-level expenditures by local governments. Grants to local governments are presented, and then adjusted to account for the effect of hurricane mitigation and recovery grants. Grants are also sorted and analyzed by the awarding federal agency ' to illustrate the source of funds, and then analyzed by type to illustrate the relative impact of project and formula grants. ' Next, specific programs and designations are analyzed. Specific programs are used to illustrate major sources of funding for local governments in Florida. Specific designations are used to illustrate an area where local governments can look to improve their draw-down. The structure of this report provides local governments with background on the issue, illustrates recent performance by peers (as indicated by expenditures), and introduces major programs and designations. Ideally, this information will provide an incentive for local governments to engage in grant-seeking and information to aid their entry into the application process. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 1 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations This page was intentionally left blank. 2 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 1 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations CHAPTER ONE History A. Background Florida currently has 412 municipalities and 67 counties, in addition to 67 school districts and 1,588 special districts.' Each of these local entities has constitutional and statutory responsibilities to its citizens. These responsibilities require funding. Local governments are limited in their ability to raise revenue and yet have certain mandates imposed on them from the state and federal governments. Local governments therefore must secure funding from a number of sources, including local, state, and federal. The federal government provides funds to states and local governments through a variety of means. There are several categories of federal funds that are directed to local governments. In general, federal funding that is "mandatory" means the recipient is entitled to the funds. Mandatory funding describes, for example, the Medicaid program. Funding that is "discretionary" means that Congress has the option to appropriate the funds each year. Funding for veterans' care is an example of funding that must be appropriated each year. Funds can either be provided directly to a local government or distributed to the state, which then passes the money to local governments. Loans and grants are other sources of funds. Formula grants are determined by a set of variables plugged into a formula written into law or rule and distributed to every entity meeting the formula criteria. Project grants, however, are competitive in nature, with a limited amount of money available for all awardees to share. This report examines the receipt of federal grants by counties and municipalities .2 No single resource or database exists containing this information, whether at the local, state, or federal level. Rather, this report will pull data from myriad sources to create a montage illustrating how successful - or unsuccessful - local governments are at securing federal grant dollars. By doing so, it is hoped that as fiscal considerations become more critical to governments at all levels, local governments will have additional tools and information that will improve their standings in receipt of federal project grants. B. History of Grants Any notion that federal government grants are a modern concept should be dispelled. Grants, in cash or land, have been a means of securing resources for as long as this nation has been in existence. ' The city of Jacksonville and Duval County were consolidated in 1968. 2 This report does not address grants emanating from non-federal government sources. I Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 3 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations In a 2003 report, the Congressional Research Service traced the use of the grant vehicle by Congress under the Articles of Confederation as early as 1785.3 This scenario arose when the United States made grants of land to establish townships. Every township was required to set aside one lot for the maintenance of a public school. Thus, the federal government was generous in its grant giving while still maintaining a degree of control for what it considered the public good. And, as the country at that time had more land than cash under its control, many of the grants were land or land related services such as surveying. Grants for social services did not begin until late in the 1800's and then diminished as the nation struggled after the Civil War. As the next century progressed, however, the federal government took on greater responsibility for the public good. This new approach saw Congress authorize funds for environmental, agricultural, educational, and healthcare purposes. In response to the Great Depression, Congress and President Franklin Roosevelt shifted grants to states to a new level. The types of programs initiated as part of President Roosevelt's New Deal program included the Federal Emergency Relief Act of 1933 which is credited as the first grant to states specifically for public relief.4 This act required states to match the federal funds they received equally with state funds and/or resources but allowed states to use the remaining funds in any manner they felt appropriate. Following the New Deal era, grants from the federal government to states and local governments continued to increase, most notably during President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society efforts. Remarkably, the six years of the Johnson era saw more grant programs initiated than the previous 200 years combined. Through the Nixon years, grants continued to be used but often with more federal control. Increasingly grant funds would be conditioned on the states or local governments using the money in a manner consistent with federal directions. Should the grant recipient not want to follow those directions, the funds were either not given or were withdrawn. Changes occurring during the Reagan presidency saw more grant programs being converted into block grants and an overall decrease in federal grants to state and local governments. This trend continued through President Bill Clinton's term during which Congress changed Aid to Families with Dependent Children, an entitlement program, into the block grant program called Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. In the wake of September 11, 2001 and the subsequent reorganization of the federal government associated with the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, grant programs were created to tighten security and pay for equipment and training. These programs totaled $16.04 billion between 2005 and 2007. However, not all of the money 3 Ben Canada, Federal Grants to State and Local Governments: A Brief History, Congressional Research ' Service Report RL30705, February 19, 2003. 4 Id. at 6. 5 Id. at 7. ' 4 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments I Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations appropriated has been spent, leading to concerns that backlogs have been created.s Since this federal reorganization and the increased focus on domestic security spending, few significant changes have occurred in the grant realm. Nevertheless, one promising development has been the establishment of a website designed to make finding, applying for, and managing grants much easier for grant seekers. The website, a component of a broader federal initiative,' is www.Grants. ov and will be discussed in greater detail in Chapter One, Part G. ' C. Types of Grants and Other Forms of Federal Assistance Grants are the one category of federal assistance addressed in this report; other kinds of federal assistance are outside the scope of this project but warrant an introduction to avoid potential confusion. According to the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance8 other types of federal assistance include: direct payments for specified use; direct payments with unrestricted use; direct loans; guaranteed/insured loans; insurance; sale, exchange, or donation of property or goods; provision of specialized services; advisory services and counseling, dissemination of technical information; training; investigation of complaints; and, federal employment. While some of these assistance categories such as federal employment or insurance bear little resemblance to grant awards, other types such as direct payments can be quite similar from a practical perspective. Furthermore, certain grants such as the Airport Improvement Program include elements of multiple types of assistance, including grant awards and the dissemination of technical ' information. There are many different kinds of grants. A grant of any sort is essentially a benefit ' provided by the grantor to a grantee that does not need to be paid or given back. A formula grant is one in which a specific amount of money is appropriated for a function, having been calculated based on a series of variables such as the population of a distinct group, state income, or crime rate.9 The formula used is mandated by legislative or regulatory action. Although there is some predictability when securing this type of grant, grantees often point out that the data used to calculate the dollar amount under the formula is out of date, inaccurate, or a poor measuring tool to use. For example, the amount of federal funds states receive through the Medicaid program is determined by a formula. The formula looks at a state's personal income averaged over a three-year period to determine the amount of matching funds from the federal government. In simple terms, the higher the state's personal income, the lower the matching funds will be. In a somewhat ironic twist of fate, the assistance many ' Floridians' received in response to the several hurricanes that hit the state in recent years has resulted in a higher state personal income under the Medicaid formula, thus 6 USA Today, States' Post 9-11 Grants Unspent, June 25, 2007, http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-06-25-state-terror-qrants N.htm. 7 http://Grants.gov/aboutgrants/about grants gov.isp. 8 For a complete discussion of the various types of federal assistance, see the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, Types of Assistance: hftp://12.46.245.173/pls/portal3O/CATALOG.TYP ASSISTANCE DYN.show. David R. Beam & Timothy J. Conlan, The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, p. 355 (Lester M. Salamon, ed., Oxford University Press 2002). ' Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 5 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations leaving Florida with increasingly lower federal matching funds. The Florida Congressional Delegation continues to work with other members of Congress to remedy this seemingly unjust result.10 Block grants are a type of formula grant that offers a great deal of predictability for budget purposes in that each grantee is awarded a specific amount of money, regardless of need, and then must determine the most efficient way to use that money. Within the confines of the dollar amount, the grantee has relatively broad discretion regarding how to use the award. Until 1996, Assistance to Families with Dependent Children was an entitlement grant program, meaning whatever a state needed the federal government paid. In 1996, Congress changed that program into a block grant structure, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. This block grant program required each state to determine how best to use a finite amount of money to serve its needy population. Project grants are awarded for specific endeavors by the grantee, and may provide full or partial funding. Project grants tend to be smaller dollar amounts than formula or block grants and the application process is generally competitive. Project grants can be extremely valuable to smaller local governments that might not meet the criteria for certain formula grants, given that there is more flexibility in the award process. While there is some flexibility in project grants there are generally some requirements associated with their award. The Head Start Program is an example of this, where all local governments are eligible to apply but at least 90 percent of the children enrolled must be from families whose income is below the poverty level as established by federal guidelines. These requirements generally are put in place to advance the goals of the program. Grants can also have other characteristics. For example, some grants are given directly to states with the funds then "passed through" to subgrantees, such as local governments. Medicaid falls into this category of grants. Other grants are offered only if the grantee can commit or "match" a certain percentage of the total funding from local sources. Still other grants have characteristics of both project and formula grants, one of which is Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS, which has a formula component for areas meeting certain criteria, but also has a project component for service delivery models of national significance. Still other grants are only offered based upon certain designations or in the case of certain events. One such grant is Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters), in which awards are only available to areas declared a disaster area by the President. It is necessary to understand these intricacies of the grants realm in order to maximize a local government's draw-down of federal grant funds so that programs are not written off unnecessarily and opportunities for funding are not missed. 10 Lesley Clark, Florida's Post-storm Income Rise Cuts Federal Medicaid Cash, The Miami Herald, Feb. 14, 2008. 6 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations D. Why Grants Matter The importance of federal grants to local (and state) governments cannot be overstated. Federal financial assistance to Florida's county and municipal governments over the last twenty years has accounted for significant local revenues ranging from 14 percent in 1979 to 7 percent in 2005. Through its survey and subsequent outreach efforts, LCIR staff sought information on any cost-benefit analysis that local governments may have performed to ascertain what the pay-off in dollars is relative to a grantwriter's salary. Although staff was unsuccessful in collecting much information on this issue, anecdotal stories can be found. ' A good example presents itself in the situation facing Palm Beach County, and presumably other localities. Last year, Congress had appropriated $520 million for local criminal justice programs - this year that figure has dropped to $175 million. In response to federal grant dollars being reduced by two-thirds, the county is considering establishing a special taxing district to make up for the lost revenues." On a related note, some scientists lament that with less research and development funding, the country will experience a brain drain. Less funding translates into fewer proposals being approved, which translates into scientists going to other countries such as India or China to conduct research. Recruiting efforts by higher education institutions and business are suffering as a result of this increased competition for the best and brightest. 12 Taking a positive look at what grants can do for a community leads to St. Petersburg's experience in the late 1990's. In 1995, the city created a position for a full-time grant writer. In ten years, the grant writer brought in $17 million in grants (not all federal funding). Some years, grants awarded as a result of the person's efforts exceeded her annual salary by ten times. Yet, the grant writer was moved to another position within the mayor's office, and was ultimately let go as a result of budget cuts. 13 The void caused by the employee's position change and ultimate dismissal has not been filled. The passage below offers a good illustration of how resources can be sought and coordinated from a variety of sources to achieve important community goals. 11 Jane Musgrave, Criminal Justice Panel to Consider Taxing District - Dwindling, Uncertain Funding a Concern, Palm Beach Post, Jan. 29, 2008. 12 Madhusmita Bora, Funds Drying Up in the Idea War, The St. Petersburg times, Jan. 27, 2008. 13 John Barry, The Face of Tax Cuts, The St. Petersburg Times, July 7, 2007., retrieved at htto://pgasb.pgarchiver.com/SDtimes/access/1300812621.html?dids=1300812621:1300812621 &FMT=FT &FMTS=ABS: FT&date=Jul+7%2C+2007&author=&Dub=St.+Petersbura+Times&edition=&startoaae=l . E &desc=THE+FACE+OF+TAX+CUTS. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 7 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Florida's economy is highly dependent on the health of the agricultural industry, which is supported by workers who cultivate and harvest Florida's agricultural commodities. There is a lack of clean, safe and sanitary housing for the thousands of farmworkers and their families who depend on agricultural employment... Catholic Charities, Inc. received $1,020,000 in loan funds and $780,000 in grant funds from Rural Development to build 16 units of labor housing. Initial funding was made possible through the USDA "Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Housing Grant" awarded to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Rural Development's Section 514 labor housing loan program and Section 516 labor housing grant program provided additional critical funding to this project. In 2003, they received $2.5 million in loan funds and $500,000 in grant funds to build an additional 26 units of labor housing for the combined 42 units. Catholic Charities, Inc. also received 39 units of Rental Assistance subsidy to ensure the units are affordable for farmworker families. Additional grant funding has come from HUD, the Federal Home Loan Association, and Hillsborough County. The San Jose Mission is a residential community supported by an onsite health, education, and social services campus for low-income farmworker families... The 122 farmworker housing units at the San Jose Mission are the result of a Federal, state, local, and faith-based partnership that support farmworkers and agribusiness in the Dover-Plant City area. 14 (December 2004) As the scenario above illustrates, it often takes seed money to coordinate and draw down funds from several layers of government and other sources, but the return on investment can be significant. E. Revenue Sources for Local Governments By their very nature, as well as constitutional and statutory provisions, local governments are constrained regarding how they can raise revenue. The LCIR issues an annual report, Local Government Financial Information Handbook, in which both narrative and fiscal information are provided regarding the revenue sources available to local governments. The largest source of local governments' revenues is ad valorem taxes, which are authorized under the Florida Constitution. Local governments may also raise funds through certain "home rule" recognized ?owers, as well as legislatively permissible shared, own source, and local option taxes.' Revenue sources authorized under the Florida Constitution not only include ad valorem taxes but also a Constitutional Fuel Tax of 2 cents per gallon of gasoline, distributed to counties exclusively for debt service payments. The state constitution otherwise constrains the ability of local governments to raise revenue through taxes for their operations. 16 14 Retrieved on January 1, 2008 from Department of Agriculture's website at httQ://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rd/stories/fl-20041213-sanoose.html. The LCIR report can be found at http://www.floridalcir.gov/reports.cfm. Additional information can be found in: Nabors, Giblin, & Nickerson, P.A., Primer on Home Rule & and Local Government Revenue Sources (2005) and the Florida Department of Revenue's Office of Tax Research, 2007 Florida Tax Handbook Including Fiscal Impact of Potential Changes (2007). 1r' Section 1(a), Art. VII, State Constitution. 8 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments , Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations "Home rule" powers authorized by the Florida Constitution permit local governments to levy fees for funding services and improvements, which must avoid classification as a tax. The 2007 Local Government Financial Information Handbook identifies franchise fees, impact fees, special assessments, and user fees as examples of home rule revenue sources. Revenue sources that must be authorized by the Legislature fall into three categories: taxes which the state levies and then shares with local governments; own-source revenues; and local option taxes. Taxes collected by the state and then shared with local governments often have eligibility criteria and are distributed by formula. Own- source revenues are implemented and collected by local governments often requiring an. ordinance to be enacted for levy and collection. Local option taxes are generally restricted to specific purposes and require a majority or majority plus one vote of the local governing body or referendum approval. These revenue sources provide a base for local governments which can then be supplemented through the draw down of federal grants in order to enhance the provision of services or provide improvements which would not otherwise have been possible. F. State and Federal Economic Realities Due to a convergence of factors, state revenues have not kept pace with the citizenry's needs. In October 2007, the Legislature held a Special Session at which $1.2 billion was cut from the existing budget. Governor Charlie Crist, releasing his budget proposal for FY 2008-09, reduced the budget by an additional $869 million, resulting in a proposed budget of $70 billion. The House and Senate offered their own budget proposals in mid-March, and the budget passed by the Legislature in May totals $66 billion. Although the national economy has slowed down tremendously, outright declines in broad economic measures such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP), employment, or income have so far been avoided. However, the risk of a recession exists. The downturn in the housing market, tightness in the credit market, and surge of energy costs have driven down both consumer and business confidence but rising exports and falling interest rates have so far buffered the national economy. These national trends strongly influence the Florida economy and are exacerbated by the increased severity of the housing market downturn. Florida's real estate prices rose sooner, faster, and longer than on the national level, having been aided by the rebuilding in the aftermath of the 2004 and 2005 hurricanes, and now are failing farther and harder than on the national level and exert a significant drag on the Florida economy. General Revenue available to the Legislature in FY 2009 will be about $4 billion below what was available to be spent in FY 2007. State revenue collections are expected to recover and resume normal growth in 2009. Thus far, though, General Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 9 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Revenue collections continue to be less than was previously estimated at the beginning of the 2008 Legislative Session. 17 Florida is no longer considered one of the fastest growing states in the nation. Population growth, the primary engine of Florida's economic growth, has slowed down from the 2.0 percent to 2.6 percent range experienced since the mid 1990's to 1.8 percent in 2007. Consumer sentiment, which can be a leading indicator of a recession, is eroding. In Florida, it is currently (May 2008) at a level only one point above its lowest level since 1991.18 Florida faces six threats to consumer spending: slower population growth; loss of wealth from declining home prices; growing housing inventory; spreading credit crunch; elevated energy prices, and; an increased potential for a recession. The national economy is being subjected to three major shocks - home prices are falling for the first time since the Great Depression; financial markets are experiencing their worst credit crunch since the late 1980s; and oil prices are at record levels hovering at $130 per barrel - but changing daily.19 Nationally, the consumer confidence index is the lowest it has been in 15 years.20 According to the National Association of Realtors, the nation's housing inventory as of the end of April 2008 reflected 4.55 million existing homes available for sale. If the pace of current sales remained constant, that would reflect an 11.2 month supply of homes. The supply of condominiums available is even higher.21 Negative fiscal scenarios at the national level naturally trickle down to states and local governments. The chart below illustrates the decrease in federal grants to states and local governments as compared to the Gross Domestic Product showing that grant funding has not kept pace with growth of the economy even during this time of slowing economic growth. z 17 Monthly Revenue Report, Office of Economic and Demographic Research, The Florida Legislature,Vol. 28, No. 10, April, 2008, found at htt ://edr.state.fl.us/re orts/newsletters/newsletters.htm. 78 Florida Consumer Confidence Index, University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research, May 31, 2008, found at http://www.bebr.ufl.edu/cci. 19 Price for crude oil per barrel taken from Bloomberg market data http://www,bloomberg.com/energv/. ao Bob Willis, U.S. Consumer Confidence Index Declines to 15% Year Low, May 27, 2008, httg://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aUishmdODWzs&refer=home. Existing Home Sales Dip 1% in April, Daily News Report, National Association of Realtors, May 23, 2008, found at http://www.realtor.org/rmodaily.nsf/f3c66dOc6457cl el 862570af000cb13b/a45922887edd1 d91862574520 04e4d8e?012enDocument. Iris & Phillip Oliff, Federal Grants to States and Localities Cut Deeply in Fiscal Year 2009 Federal Budget, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Feb. 4, 2008. (The figures do not include Medicaid and have been adjusted for inflation.) 10 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments I Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Table 1.1:. Comparison of Grants to Gross Domestic Product Grants as a Percent of GDP 2.6% 2.0'% 1.5% 1.0% 0.50% 0.0% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities G. Changes in the Grants Realm The latter half of this decade is witness to some of the most significant changes to how local government staff (and others) can find and apply for viable grants. Not since the 1970's has the federal government sought to streamline or improve the grant process. 1. Single Point of Contact A change instituted in 1982 had the potential to be significant, but is voluntary for states, and each state has been left to its own devices to implement it. During President Ronald Reagan's Administration, the President issued Executive Order 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs."23 This order called for states to establish processes and a single point of contact at the state level, and to coordinate and review, in consultation with local governments, proposed federal financial assistance and direct federal development. However, states were given the option of ! not participating in this exercise and the majority of states have opted out24 or have since chosen to discontinue participation in the grant review process, as Wisconsin did in July 2007. Many states that have established a single point of contact (SPOC) have done so only with limited reach. In response to EO 12372, Florida Governor Bob Graham issued Executive Order 83- 150, establishing the State Clearinghouse within the Governor's Office of Planning and Budgeting as the Single Point of Contact. That EO also called for the Regional 23 Executive Order 12372, July 14, 1982, 47 FR 30959, 3 C.F.R., 1982 Comp., p. 197. 24 Currently, 22 states are listed at hftp://www.whitehouse.-gov/omb/grants/sr)oc.htmi as participating in Executive Order 12372 reviews, although Wisconsin had indicated to LCIR staff that it should no longer be on that list, thus reducing the number to 21. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 11 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Planning Councils to serve as Regional Clearinghouses. Changes were made to the review process in 1993 under Executive Order 93-194, primarily to ensure that reviews were conducted in a manner consistent with the Florida Coastal Management Program. In 1995, Governor Lawton Chiles issued Executive Order 95-359. This EO moved review of grants subject to Presidential EO 12372 to the Department of Community Affairs, with continuing oversight by the Governor's Office. Subsequent to that Governor's Executive Order, the Florida State Clearinghouse, serving as the state's SPOC, was moved to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) as part of a governmental reorganization. 5 DEP lists the conditions under which an entity's application for federal funds must be reviewed by the SPOC.26 Information on DEP's website states that a grant application must be submitted to DEP if it: 1. Originates from a state agency, state university, or state community college; or 2. Involves applications for federal funding, excluding student loans and small business loans. These projects generally originate from local school boards, local health departments and profiYnonprofit organizations; or 3. Includes activities that may affect Florida's environment or water quality, such as construction or transportation; or 4. Pertains to one or more of the following state and federal laws: - Section 216.212, Florida Statutes - Florida Coastal Management Program (FCMP) - Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) - National Historic Preservation Act.(NHPA) - National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) - Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Lands Act; 5. Involves projects which have been determined to have a significant effect on Florida's environment, including those requiring: - Environmental Assessments (EAs) - Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) - FCMP Consistency Determinations In practice, however, DEP staff has advised that only a fraction of grant applications are reviewed by the state clearinghouse. Those that are reviewed deal primarily with some degree of construction requiring environmental review or coordination, such as transportation or water projects. Many grant applications are forwarded to DEP, but " Ch. 2002-275, ss. 2 and 8, L.O.F.; s. 403.061(40), F.S. 26 More information regarding the SPOC can be found at http://www.der).state.fl.us/secretary/oip/state clearinghouse/info brochure.htm 12 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations require no review. The realities of the review process, coupled with the goal to further streamline that process, may warrant changes. Current practices regarding the SPOC in Florida should be evaluated to determine if it should be dispersed with, modified, or maintained. Other states were polled by LCIR staff regarding the function of their respective SPOCs. To avoid receiving superfluous applications, South Carolina's Single Point of Contact lists on its website the Tecific CFDA numbers and programs that require submittal to the grants review office. Wisconsin chose in 2007 to discontinue participation in the SPOC review process. After a recent review process, Rhode Island now focuses its review of grants involving construction, design, and engineering and is housed in the state's Division of Planning. Somewhat similar to Rhode Island and Florida, California reviews only grants that may have an environmental impact. Currently, Texas reviews all grants subject to EO 12372, as does Mississippi. However, staff from Texas report that legislation may be filed in the next legislative session to narrow the scope of that state's Clearinghouse's review. Michigan, Missouri, and West Virginia all distribute grant applications to regional planning offices. Those three states indicate that the review is done in a timely manner and there are no efforts to change the existing process. Delaware advised LCIR staff that it reviews grant applications by state agencies and private agency grants subject to EO 12372; this review is done monthly by a committee comprising legislators and cabinet members. Nevada has a clearinghouse in its Executive branch, yet reports that due to limited staffing and resources, grants are rarely reviewed. 2. www. Grants.4ov In the late 1990s, Congress took huge strides in addressing concerns from potential grantees with the passage of the Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act of 1999 (the Act).28 A major component of the Act was the establishment and operation of an interactive website. The Act requires each of the federal government's 26 agencies to participate in the functioning of this website by posting all available grants through the centralized site. Using FY 2005 data, this means access to more than 1,000 programs29 representing almost $470 billion 30 available in federal financial assistance can be accessed from one website. Grantees' displeasure in the grant process as it stood prior to enactment of the Act was well documented and grantees' input in the establishment and operation of www.Grants.gov has been considerable.31 It appears that the federal 27 For more information on South Carolina's State Clearinghouse, go to http://www.budget.sc.gov/OSB- clearinghouse.phtm. ' Pub L. 106-107 (1999). 29 http://www.Grants.gov/aboutgrants/grants.iso 30 Consolidated Federal Funds Report found at http://www.census.gov/govs/www/cffr.htmi 31 U.S. Government Accountability Office, Grants Management. Additional Actions Needed to Streamline and Simplify Processes, April 2005, GAO-05-335 and U.S. Government Accountability Office, Grants Management. Grantees' Concerns with Efforts to Streamline and Simplify Processes, July 2006, GAO- 06-566. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 13 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations government is complying with its mandate from Congress and is striving to make the job for those seeking grants considerably easier. The website has many user-friendly features. These include supplying users with updates regarding technological enhancements to the website. Most importantly, however, the website allows interested parties to register with the website, complete a profile, and register for alerts regarding grants that may be of interest to the registrant. This in effect, makes www.Grants.go_v a one-stop shop for finding grant opportunities. Local governments (and others) would be wise to take full advantage of this continually improving website.32 Florida's state budget has experienced enough fluctuation over the last 20 years to make other funding sources quite significant. The importance of grants is underscored by the fact that information regarding grants can be found on the websites of U.S. Senators Bill Nelson and Mel Martinez, and each of Florida's 25 Members of Congress. Even some local governments have web pages dedicated to grants which help potential grantees find and apply for grants from both public and private sources.33 While many steps in the grant process require consultation and coordination with the local government's governing body, there are many books and seminars available to teach and guide staff on how to pursue grants.34 Staff must be knowledgeable about the locality's needs before trying to-identify a grant that would address that need. Staff must ascertain whether any matching funds are available, if necessary, as well as whether any conditions of the grant are unacceptable to the local government. 35 Once a suitable grant is identified, an application must be completed, often requiring significant technical expertise. If a grant is awarded, there must be follow-up with an implementation plan and stewardship steps. Most grants have various reporting requirements that must be followed through completion of the project. 32 For an example of how a local government has used this website to great advantage see Appendix D. 33 Miami-Dade County has such a page which can be found at http://www.miamidade.gov/grants/. 34 Cheryl Carter New & James Aaron Quick, How to Write a Grant Proposal, (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003). 35 Some conditions called "crosscutting" measures, if not met can result not just in that grant being cut but may put other benefits at risk, as well. 14 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations CHAPTER TWO Fiscal Data A. Introduction to Potential Data Sources A dataset containing information on specific grant awards to local governments across time would be ideal, but is not currently available. LCIR staff analyzed several sources of data on federal grant awards, each of which presents unique challenges. An annual report published by the LCIR, Review of Federal Funding to Florida '3 uses two U.S. Census Bureau reports: the Consolidated Federal Funds Report (CFFR) 37 and Federal Aid to States (FAS).38 The Census Bureau also maintains a quarterly database, the ' Federal Assistance Award Data System (FAADS),39 and the federal government uses this database to help establish a website meeting the criteria required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA).ao FAADS is often used as a primary or secondary source for other government reports related to federal grant awards, including the CFFR and FAS.41 There are reliability issues pertaining to this data source. The Congressional Research Service reports that FAADS contains incomplete and inaccurate information which can not be easily corrected.42 The CFFR and FAS both use FAADS as a secondary source to supplement data collected from federal agencies but they do not exhibit the level of detail in types of federal awards analyzed or the geographic scope of analysis and such ' can not be used in this project. The CFFR includes all types of federal assistance grouped by county (as a geographic entity) and FAS analyzes federal grants, but groups the state and local governments together. Under FFATA, a website was to be created that would allow the public, at no cost, to see where federal dollars were being spent down to the specific grantee. Initially, the website was www.FederaiSpending.gov, but has since been relaunched as www.USASpending.gov. Even by its own analysis, the completeness of the data reported to and reflected on the website is not impressive as it is largely based on FAADS data 43 and as such is subject to the same shortcomings. In fact, it is estimated that grants data on this website is not more than 65 percent complete. 44 Consequently, this source was not considered for use in our analysis. It is also not clear what entity actually is responsible for the operation of the website. 36 htt ://www.floridalcir. ov/UserContent/does/File/re orts/fedfundsO5. df. 37 htt ://www.census. ov/ ovs/www/cffr.html. 38 http://www.census.agv/prod/www/abs/fas.html. 39 hftp://www.census,gov/govs/www/faads.htmi. ' 40 Pub. L. 109-2$2 (2006). 41 The CFFR uses FAADS as a primary data source but supplements the data with other sources and FAS uses FAADS as a secondary source when necessary. Thus, all reliability issues pertaining to ' FAADS do not necessarily pertain to the CFFR or FAS. 42 Congressional Research Service, The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act: Background, Overview, and Implementation Issues, Oct. 6, 2006. 43 Data Timeliness, Footnote 1 hftp;//www.usaspending_gov/data/dataguality.php?repty_ge=a. 1 44 Data Completeness http://www.usaspending.oov/data/datagualityphp?reptvpe=a. ' Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 15 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations States, like the federal government, are responding to the public's call to be more transparent in their expenditures. Two efforts to achieve more popular awareness are underway in Florida. First, the Florida Department of Financial Services, under Alex Sink, Florida's Chief Financial Officer, has established a database that allows the public to review financial information regarding revenues and expenditures reported by local governments to that agency.45 Secondly, following the pattern established by the federal government under the FFATA, a bill was filed during the 2008 Legislative Session that would require local governments to put on their websites information regarding most contracts requiring $5,000 or more in expenditures. 46 The bill died in Messages. However, Governor Charlie Crist has established his own initiative to expand the public's access to the Governor's and state agencies' contracts (and other) activities.47 In analyzing the value, in both dollars and impact, of grants to local governments, many challenges arise. To illustrate, notwithstanding the definitions above, the mere use of the word "grant" can take on different meanings, depending on the source. For example, in the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Analytical Perspectives of the Budget of the United States Government for FY 2008, the OMB states that "grants include both outright grants and the value of loan subsidies."48 This definition precludes any direct comparison with data on the federal government's Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) website, which defines grants differently. For the aforementioned reasons, it was necessary for LCIR staff to create a dataset of grants to local governments within the state. Multiple methods were used to both create and verify this dataset, beginning with a Faxnet survey administered by staff to all counties and municipalities within the state, which is summarized in Chapter Two, Part B. Furthermore, staff pursued alternative measures of data procurement discussed in Chapter Two, Part C. B. Survey As mentioned, one of the challenges in seeking to analyze any trends that may exist is a shortage of reliable data. In an effort to put together a snapshot of relevant information, LCIR staff issued a survey to counties and municipalities. Of 66 counties surveyed, 27 responded (41 percent). The response rate for municipalities was even less. Only 54 municipalities out of 394 responded (14 percent).49 Although the 45 The website can be found at hftps://ai)i)s.fldfs.com/LocalGov/Reports/AdHoc.asr)x. 48 See SB 392, 2008 Legislative Session. See also, Transparency in Local Government Revenues and Expenditures, The Florida Senate Committee on Community Affairs, Interim Project Report 2009-109, Nov. 2007. 47 See http://www.flgov.com/og_home. 48 Office of Management and Budget, Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2008, p. 101, footnote 1. 49 Loxahatchee Groves and Grant-Valkaria were not surveyed since they were incorporated too recently. Attempts to contact Altha, Bartow, Bascom, Briny Breezes, Campbellton, Crystal River, Glen Saint Mary, Horseshoe Beach, Islandia, Lake Wales, Lazy Lake, Raiford, Reddick, and Saint Lucie Village were unsuccessful. 16 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations response rate to the survey was disappointing, those local governments that did respond provided adequate information to allow staff to fashion some basic observations to make recommendations. Designated Grant Writers: Four counties employed personnel who worked on grants exclusively, as did four municipalities. All other respondents reported staff worked on a variety of other matters in addition to grants. Consultants: Only one county used a consultant to help prepare the survey response, whereas three municipalities did. Grants.gov: Most of the counties, 14 of 27, reported using www.Grants.gov as a resource for finding grant opportunities, although only 17 of 54 municipalities did so. One county shared that it no longer uses a private service to find grant opportunities but instead uses the website almost exclusively (Osceola). Single Point of Contact: As mentioned earlier, federal law allows states to designate a Single Point of Contact to review certain grant applications. Florida has designated in statute the Department of Environmental Protection as the SPOC.50 Four of the counties responding to the survey were not aware of this fact. As for municipalities, 26 ' of 54 were not familiar with the SPOC. ' Barriers: When asked to identify conditions that served as barriers to being successful in the federal grant realm, local governments' responses were not unexpected. The majority of the complaints centered on the lack of available matching funds, excessive bureaucracy in the process, lack of staff and time to participate, short turnaround times in the application process, and lack of staff "know-how" on specific grant subject matter. Suggestions: Despite having the forum to make any suggestions to improve the grants realm, comments from local governments were fairly consistent, with a few major themes emerging. One of the most cited suggestions was that there be a single uniform application form for all grants. The inconsistencies among federal agencies' grant applications were seen as very time-consuming and difficult to handle. Several respondents did not care for having so many competitive grants, opining that often thousands of dollars had to be spent (for engineering reports, for example) with a minimal chance of success. Along those lines, a few counties advocated for grants going only to the counties, who could then determine how to allocate the funds among the municipalities. Locals called for improved communication between applicants and federal agencies and less paperwork. Finally, respondents suggested that the time between grant announcement and application deadline be lengthened, but the time between grant application and award be shortened. Although fiscal data was requested, due to the low response rate it was not suitable for ' presentation in this project. When appropriate, survey data was used to verify the accuracy of downloaded fiscal data from corresponding years. These results illustrate a 50 s. 403.061(40), F.S. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 17 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations remarkable deal of consistency with the downloaded fiscal data eventually used in analysis, and speak to the credibility of the data collection process. C. Data Used in this Report Given the considerable difficulty in obtaining data from a single source an alternative approach was selected which, at a minimum, provides a cogent picture of where local governments stand in their receipt of direct federal grants. A two-prong approach was employed by LCIR staff to create this picture. Information was sought from the reporting collection point, that is, audits filed with the Florida Auditor General's Office. 51 LCIR staff reviewed and analyzed the audits. Information was also sought from reporting origination point, that is, the local governments. This was done through the survey instrument sent by LCIR staff to cities and counties. Fiscal data utilized in this report comes from Federal Single Audits, filed in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendment of 1996 and required by OMB Circular A-133 "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations" which is designed to meet the needs of the non-federal entity and the federal awarding agencies.52 Single Audits are a requirement for any non-federal entity whose expenditures in a fiscal year exceed $500,000 ($300,000 for fiscal years ending prior to December 31, 2003) and are available to the public via the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. 53 Staff identified units of local government through the Primary Employee Identification Number (EIN)54 and created a database containing grant level expenditure data, with grant programs identified by the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number (CFDA Number) for all local governments in Florida required to file a Federal Single Audit. Eligibility and award type data used in this report comes from the CFDA, specifically the Applicant Eligibility Index.55 This index identifies programs by type and provides a matrix listing eligible applicants by CFDA Number. This information was used to create a list of the award programs local governments are eligible to apply for, and an indicator for whether the award program type was project or formula. Awards not listed in the current CFDA were matched to their successors to increase consistency across time using the Historical Crosswalk of Catalog Programs.56 Finally, the respective data sets were merged utilizing CFDA program numbers to create a single data set. Programs which did not include local governments as an eligible applicant were deleted from the data set in order to meet the scope of this analysis. The resulting data set thus covers project and formula grants that local governments are eligible to apply for, and includes all county and municipal 51 Fiscal data utilized in this report comes from the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. This data is also available electronically through the Federal Audit Clearinghouse Single Audit Database at http://harvester.census.gov/sac/dissem/accessoptions.htmI?submit=Retrieve+Records, 02 Single Audit Basics http://harvester.census.gov/sac/cfoBrochure2005.pdf. 53 http://harvester.census.gov/sac/. 54 Single Audit field definition list hftr)://harvester.census.,qov/sac/dissem/tableDesc.html. 55 CFDA, Applicant Eligibility Index. http://12.46.245.173_/CF_DA/pdf/applicant indx.pdf. 56 http://l 2.46.245.173/CFDA/12df/hist_crosswalk.pdf. 18 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations ¦ governments that filed a Single Audit in the respective year. Put simply, LCIR staff began with a dataset listing all expenditures of federal funds by county and municipal governments in Florida. Then staff removed all expenditures that were not from grant awards or otherwise ineligible sources to construct a dataset of expenditures of federal grants by local governments in Florida. The data set covers fiscal years ending September 30, 2002 to 2006 and contains several descriptive variables for a specific federal award. These descriptive variables ' are the name of the local government entity, the CFDA Number, the federal award program name, the amount of annual expenditures for each specific award, an indicator of whether the award was direct or pass-through, and the fiscal year in which the expenditures occurred. The entire data set is not used in this report due to the sheer volume; alternatively, LCIR staff created summary tables to meet analytical needs. The source and quality of information have been established and complete annual tables are available in the Appendices. It should be noted that the use of cumulative totals in the body of this report is an attempt to account for changing conditions over time by partially removing the influence of events in any single year. Still, the data must be "normalized" to fully remove the influence of outside events. County and municipal governments are analyzed separately, primarily to maintain consistency and avoid comparing "apples to oranges." Population data used to calculate per capita expenditures presented in this report is provided by the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR). These BEBR estimates do not include temporary residents of the state but do include the inmate and ' other group quarters populations of a given locality. The exclusion of temporary residents is standard practice by the U.S. Census Bureau and the inclusion of inmates and other group quarters represents less than 1 percent of the statewide population. These population estimates for all counties and municipalities in the state are available on the LCIR website.57 In summary, data from this report comes from Single Audits, the CFDA, and Intercensal Estimates published by BEBR. The combination of these three sources, particularly Single Audits and the CFDA results, is a unique resource with no equivalent available. Local governments are encouraged to utilize this data, available at http://www.floridalcir.gov/dataatof.cfm for comparison to their peers as they consider or continue grant-seeking. D. Unadjusted Grant Expenditures by Local Governments Counties and municipalities across the state receive numerous and varied grant awards, with the nature of the community often dictating eligibility for a specific program. For this reason, characteristics of a community play a role in the grant-seeking process ' so relevant population data is included in this analysis. Naturally, the more populous 57 Counties, http://www.floridalcir.gov/UserContent/docs/File/data/FLcopops.xls; Municipalities, http://www.floridalcir.gov/UserContent/docs/File/data/FLmupops.xls. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 19 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations urban areas of the state have more resources at their disposal and as a result should experience greater success in grant-seeking; however, this is not necessarily to the exclusion of successful grant-seeking by smaller or rural communities. In particular, certain USDA grant programs target rural areas, and many rural communities in Florida avail themselves of these programs. In fact, the impact of some grants may be more apparent, to and have a more immediate effect upon, a greater proportion of residents in smaller communities based simply on accessibility. For these reasons small local governments should not write off grant-seeking, and should actively identify and pursue grants for which they are eligible. Unadjusted totals will overstate expenditures of federal awards by local governments for one primary reason: these totals include Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) awards only available due to the Presidential Declaration of Disaster made in response to the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. While this "FEMA Effect" is accounted for later in this chapter it is also worthwhile to introduce and analyze totals which include these programs due to the relative frequency with which Florida is forced to deal with disasters. The clearly identified trend in this analysis of unadjusted total and per capita expenditures is that larger local governments are able to draw down (presumably, if they expend federal funds they have previously drawn them down) greater total amounts of federal awards while smaller local governments tend to draw down more dollars per person. This should provide large and small local governments with both the justification and the incentive to begin or intensify grant-seeking at some level. Larger local governments are able to spend greater aggregate amounts, allowing them to pursue more ambitious projects that have a greater impact on the region as a whole, while smaller local governments can pursue awards that are local in nature and will have a greater impact on the average constituent. Furthermore, cumulative and per capita expenditures for the entire sample of counties is available in Table 2.3 and for the entire sample of municipalities in Table 2.6. This information, as well as tables representing grant-level expenditures, is available via the LCIR website at http://www.floridaIcir.gov/dataatof.cfm. 1. County Governments Fiscal data from county governments identifies Broward, Miami-Dade, and Palm Beach counties as reporting the greatest unadjusted total expenditures of federal grants funds of Florida counties. This is most likely due to their ability to devote resources to grant- seeking as well as their receipt of formula grants, where a larger population base can translate directly to more dollars drawn down. Cumulative reported expenditures for FYs 2002 through 2006 range from a maximum of $1,333,820,831 by Miami-Dade County to a minimum of $606,111 by Columbia County. Table 2.1 illustrates counties with the top ten reported expenditures for the sample time frame, as well as the respective rank implied by the total population as of April 1, 2006. 20 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments i Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations It should be noted that Escambia's expenditures are concentrated in FY 2005 and are largely due to hurricane recovery grants as is discussed later in this chapter. Also of note is the fact that Miami-Dade County spends nearly a billion dollars more over the sample time frame than the next closest county. This phenomenon is largely due to greater availability of resources and the effect of hurricane recovery efforts, as will be discussed subsequently. Table 2.1: Unadjusted Expenditures of Federal Grants by Counties County 2006-2006 Cumulative Ex enditures 2006 Population Rank Miami-Dade $1,333,820,831 1 Palm Beach $378,206,440 3 Broward $320,327,851 2 Escambia $275,663,887 17 Orange $247,049,369 5 Hillsborough $245,469,293 4 Lee $142,883,749 8 Volusia $135,443,180 11 Pinellas $111,832,021 6 Polk $103,619,054 9 Source: Florida LCIR When expenditures are analyzed on a per capita basis, however, the relative importance of population does not hold. In fact, the top four counties in terms of per capita expenditures are Calhoun, Escambia, De Soto, and Monroe in that order. While Miami-Dade is ranked sixth, Palm Beach and Broward are not in the top ten. Cumulative per capita expenditures, calculated by taking the sum of per capita expenditures for FYs 2002 through 2006, range from a maximum of $1,858.23 by Calhoun County to a minimum of $10.36 by Columbia County. Once again, an exception applies to Escambia as discussed above. Table 2.2 illustrates the counties reporting the ten greatest per capita expenditures, and the ranking that their respective populations imply. This picture clearly illustrates the concept introduced previously, that in smaller communities grant awards can have a potentially larger impact on the individual than in their larger counterparts. Table 2.. Unadjusted Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grants b t County 2002-2006 Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Calhoun $1,858.23 63 Escambia $904.76 17 DeSoto $805.71 48 Monroe $733.44 37 Hardee $576.65 51 Miami-Dade $561.10 1 Santa Rosa $521.78 31 Liberty $471.78 67 Holmes $403.70 56 Charlotte $390.47 28 Source: Florida LCII :ounties 2 I Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 21 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Cumulative and per capita expenditure data for the entire sample of counties are available in Table 2.3. Annual totals for expenditures and per capita expenditures are available in Appendix A. Table 2.3: Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by County ount Cumulative Expenditures 2002-2006 Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Alachua $11,521,730 $48.53 23 55 Baker $2,212,365 $91.37 52 29 Bay $10,379,704 $58.48 26 50 Bradford $705,231 $25.08 49 62 Brevard $86,371,913 $164.66 10 26 Broward $320,327,851 $186.23 2 23 Calhoun $25,360,584 $1,858.23 63 1 Charlotte $60,786,605 $390.47 28 10 Citrus $16,425,369 $125.06 32 30 Clay $7,848,419 $48.46 25 56 Collier $64,631,757 $205.58 15 21 Columbia $606,111 $10.36 40 64 DeSoto $27,219,059 $805.71 48 3 Dixie $3,057,293 $201.56 59 20 Escambia $275,663,887 $904.76 17 2 Fla ler $5,793,382 $84.26 35 42 Franklin $890,486 $82.51 64 43 Gadsden $1,634,971 $34.60 43 59 Gilchrist $946,499 $58.36 57 51 Glades $1,242,403 $115.51 65 34 Gulf $2,618,518 $160.76 58 28 Hamilton $1,228,335 $87.31 61 41 Hardee $15,760,271 $576.65 51 5 Hendry NA NA 46 NA Hernando $13,196,975 $88.53 29 40 Highlands $5,823,515 $62.69 34 48 Hillsborough $245,469,293 $221.24 4 19 Holmes $7,650,240 $403.70 56 9 Indian River $29,979,976 $232.47 33 18 Jackson $2,562,372 $52.11 42 52 Jefferson $930,040 $65.40 62 47 Lafayette NA NA 66 NA Lake $28,497,118 $110.46 19 38 Lee $142,883,749 $271.43 8 16 Leon $8,675,561 $33.13 20 60 Lev $1,608,447 $42.79 44 58 Liberty_ $3,551,733 $471.78 67 8 Madison $1,230,667 $62.11 55 49 Manatee $49,078,393 $165.57 18 25 Marion $34,030,567 $113.10 16 35 Martin $45,692,182 $325.57 30 11 Miami-Dade $1,333,820,831 $561.10 1 6 22 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments I Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations ounty Cumulative Expenditures 2002-2006 Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Monroe $59,318,733 $733.44 37 4 Nassau $1,670,975 $24.99 39 63 Okaloosa $55,394,703 $297.36 24 13 Okeechobee $2,526,720 $67.26 47 46 Orange $247,049,369 $243.05 5 17 Osceola $27,423,889 $120.01 22 32 Palm Beach $378,206,440 $303.77 3 12 Pasco $43,986,493 $112.48 12 37 Pinellas $111,832,021 $118.53 6 33 Polk $103,619,054 $194.14 9 22 Putnam $5,581,870 $76.01 38 45 Saint Johns $12,769,324 $82.36 27 44 Saint Lucie $21,918,104 $95.29 21 39 Santa Rosa $71,166,117 $521.78 31 7 Sarasota $40,280,983 $112.88 14 36 Seminole $66,130,112 $162.71 13 27 Sumter $3,412,540 $47.63 36 57 Suwannee $1,932,279 $51.18 45 53 Taylor $639,621 $30.02 54 61 Union $707,078 $49.40 60 54 Volusia $135,443,180 $280.14 11 15 Wakulla $3,112,829 $124.65 50 31 Walton $9,866,111 $185.03 41 24 Washington $6,285,600 $282.29 53 14 Statewide Average $70,230,734 $225.01 NA NA Statewide Total $4,308,188,547 NA NA NA Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" hft ://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records', Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 2. Municipal Governments Data from municipal governments follows a very similar pattern to county governments, with larger urban areas spending a majority of the federal award money, and the top ten in expenditures matching well with the top ten in terms of population. The three exceptions are West Palm Beach, Gainesville, and Pensacola. West Palm Beach and Gainesville are central cities in their respective counties and Pensacola was seriously affected by the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. Cumulative and per capita 1 expenditure data for the entire sample of municipalities is available in Table 2.6. Cumulative expenditures by municipalities range from a maximum of $229,576,528 by Miami in Miami-Dade County as illustrated in Table 2.4 to a minimum of $1,800 by I Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 23 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Fellsmere in Indian River County. It should be noted that expenditures for the top three cities are on a par with what the top counties spend, which is somewhat surprising given the large differences in population size. This suggests that perhaps cities are able to spend more funds on a per capita basis, and should serve to provide more encouragement for all sizes and types of local governments to engage in grant-seeking. Table 2.4: Hi nest unadjusted Expenditures of Federal Grants b Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami $229,576,528 2 Jacksonville $168,480,848 1 Fort Lauderdale $122,783,037 8 Tama $103,568,824 3 Pensacola $89,450,982 43 Tallahassee $74,341,536 7 Orlando $71,005,203 6 West Palm Beach $59,089,082 19 Hialeah $54,401,961 5 Hollywood $48,887,969 12 IAunicipalitles Source: Florida LCIR Per capita expenditures by municipalities range from a maximum of $11,778.49 by Jupiter Island in Martin County as illustrated in Table 2.5 to a minimum of $0.45 by Fellsmere in Indian River County and Satellite Beach in Brevard County. When the top ten per capita expenditures are analyzed, the previously identified trend is again observed .58 In this case, however, the trend is exaggerated, with higher per capita expenditures and smaller populations. Bushnell specifically deserves recognition for the comprehensive nature of the grant information posted on their municipal website, http://www.cityofbushnellfl.com/grants.asp. The exemplary nature of their grants page illustrates that even smaller municipalities can successfully devote resources to grant- seeking and government transparency. 58 USDA Rural Water and Waste Disposal Program is included in these totals, which requires that outstanding bonds be counted as an expenditure each year. This program affects all municipalities in the top ten per capita except Freeport and White Springs. 24 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments . Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Table 2.5: Unadjusted Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grants by Municipalities unicipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Jupiter Island $11,778.49 356 Coleman $5,121.51 352 Freeport $4,139.94 317 Everglades $4,091.75 362 White Springs $2,666.13 356 Bushnell $2,337.80 273 0 a-locka $2,086.89 124 West Miami $1,916.98 204 Apalachicola $1,901.71 260 Lawte $1,811.01 351 Source: Florida LGIK Cumulative and per capita expenditure data for the entire sample of municipalities are available in Table 2.6. Annual totals for expenditures and per capita expenditures are available in Appendix A. Tnhla 9 R• Rannrtad Funanriihirrac of Fpdpral Grant Awards by Municinality unicipality ounty Cumulative Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Alachua Alachua $1,540,815 $204.57 147 118 Archer Alachua $335,013 $272.37 230 86 Gainesville Alachua $44,876,887 $386.78 14 54 Hawthorne Alachua $788,000 $576.44 227 39 High Springs Alachua $4,387,239 $1,016.15 180 26 Macclenn Baker $46,675 $9.91 173 230 Cedar Grove Bay $7,563,464 $1,270.43 162 20 Lynn Haven Bay $787,844 $57.55 109 191 Mexico Beach Bay $519,399 $446.22 231 47 Panama City Bay $5,847,248 $157.61 62 140 Panama City Beach Bay $1,097,523 $117.39 139 162 Parker Bay $25,378 $5.41 177 238 Springfield Bay $250,460 $28.07 143 211 Hampton Bradford $5,005 $11.83 247 226 Lawte Bradford $1,249,594 $1,811.01 237 10 Starke Bradford $346,392 $59.20 164 190 Cocoa Brevard $4,787,061 $283.22 104 82 Cocoa Beach Brevard $986,394 $76.68 122 178 Malabar Brevard $513,193 $189.16 201 123 Melbourne Brevard $24,151,528 $323.92 27 71 Palm Bay Brevard $15,080,891 $167.33 19 135 Rockledge Brevard $637,223 $26.22 83 214 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 25 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations unici alit ount Cumulative Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Ex enditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Satellite Beach Brevard $225,525 $20.66 133 217 Titusville Brevard $5,895,605 $138.07 52 150 Cooper City Broward $273,689 $9.62 76 231 Coral Springs Broward $26,955,148 $209.35 13 111 Dania Beach Broward $4,700,859 $166.03 79 137 Davie Broward $5,466,135 $67.10 26 182 Deerfield Beach Broward $14,749,097 $203.12 29 119 Fort Lauderdale Broward $122,783,037 $720.08 8 33 Hallandale Beach Broward $7,558,282 $213.24 65 108 Hollywood Broward $48,887,969 $342.06 12 64 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $2,797,423 $86.98 70 174 Lauderhill Broward $8,583,864 $138.19 35 149 Margate Broward $11,320,493 $205.56 43 116 Miramar Broward $18,408,812 $171.26 16 132 North Lauderdale Broward $5,888,176 $146.75 57 144 Oakland Park Broward $8,949,402 $234.08 56 99 Parkland Broward $762,811 $39.37 90 204 Pembroke Park Broward $343,414 $51.80 170 196 Pembroke Pines Broward $38,731,029 $255.85 10 91 Plantation Broward $28,886,934 $340.40 25 65 Pompano Beach Broward $21,651,952 $228.03 18 103 Southwest Ranches Broward $9,682,099 $1,305.19 149 16 Sunrise Broward $13,748,035 $154.10 22 141 Tamarac Broward $11,172,170 $190.38 39 122 Weston Broward $6,210,291 $100.92 36 169 Wilton Manors Broward $471,115 $38.36 127 205 Altha Calhoun $60,681 $109.34 243 164 Blountstown Calhoun $167,129 $68.14 210 181 Punta Gorda Charlotte $1,017,960 $62.62 105 184 Crystal River Citrus $630,657 $171.10 191 133 Green Cove Springs Cla $380,835 $63.63 161 183 Everglades Collier $2,113,942 $4,091.75 245 4 Marco Island Collier $1,366,060 $87.22 112 172 Naples Collier $8,456,761 $369.91 87 59 Lake City Columbia $1,323,836 $124.25 134 159 Arcadia De Soto $1,436,846 $211.99 157 109 Cross City Dixie $110,027 $61.64 219 186 Atlantic Beach Duval $195,460 $14.05 117 223 Baldwin Duval $97,799 $59.71 225 188 Jacksonville Duval $168,480,848 $211.02 1 110 Jacksonville Beach Duval $2,317,584 $108.37 94 165 Neptune Beach Duval $113,302 $15.70 152 221 Pensacola Escambia $89,450,982 $1,622.65 44 11 26 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments I Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations t unicipality ount Cumulative Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Bunnell Fla ler $522,151 $207.78 207 114 Palm Coast Fla ler $63,067 $0.93 30 244 Fla ler Beach Fla IerNolusia $4,886 $0.88 172 246 Apalachicola Franklin $4,546,268 $1,901.71 208 9 Carrabelle Franklin $1,194,614 $931.95 229 28 Chattahoochee Gadsden $1,804,878 $462.67 189 45 Greensboro Gadsden $21,040 $33.13 240 208 Havana Gadsden $11,812 $6.88 220 236 Quincy Gadsden $52,740 $7.29 151 234 Fannin Springs Gilchrist/Levy $9,800 $11.21 233 229 Moore Haven Glades $178,672 $109.88 224 163 Port Saint Joe Gulf $343,801 $94.66 190 170 White Springs Hamilton $2,125,621 $2,666.13 235 5 Bowling Green Hardee $2,991 $0.99 198 243 Wauchula Hardee $6,956,995 $1,593.46 183 12 Zolfo Springs Hardee $209,586 $126.10 226 157 Brooksville Hernando $571,265 $78.46 150 177 Avon Park Highlands $2,693,841 $310.80 144 75 Lake Placid Highlands $87,798 $51.20 221 197 Sebring_ Highlands $3,454,574 $342.85 137 63 Plant City Hillsborough $5,685,721 $177.20 68 130 Tama Hillsborough $103,568,824 $321.87 3 74 Tern le Terrace Hillsborough $1,202,853 $54.58 86 194 Bonifa Holmes $3,177,475 $1,164.54 202 23 Fellsmere Indian River $1,800 $0.45 179 249 Indian River Shores Indian River $221,070 $60.62 192 187 Sebastian Indian River $6,457,189 $328.35 91 70 Vero Beach Indian River $25,758,736 $1,435.32 101 14 Alford Jackson $636,835 $1,302.88 246 17 Graceville Jackson $67,546 $27.57 209 213 Grand Ride Jackson $255,809 $284.88 234 81 Marianna Jackson $6,656,468 $1,023.77 159 25 Sneads Jackson $2,885,643 $1,473.77 215 13 Monticello Jefferson $265,292 $104.73 206 167 Clermont Lake $11,261 $0.82 89 247 Eustis Lake $631,278 $37.37 103 206 Leesburg Lake $3,977,283 $234.13 99 98 Mascotte Lake $32,534 $9.38 184 232 Mount Dora Lake $636,319 $59.21 132 189 Tavares Lake $221,188 $19.99 126 218 Bonita Springs Lee $767,441 $17.64 53 220 Cape Coral Lee $24,328,742 $177.21 9 129 Fort M ers Lee $15,073,538 $254.87 32 92 Fort Myers Beach Lee $2,420,544 $352.35 154 62 I Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 27 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations unicipality ount Cumulative Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Sanibel Lee $8,191,374 $1,297.96 163 18 Tallahassee Leon $74,341,536 $443.08 7 49 Chiefland Lev $72,047 $34.61 213 207 Williston Lev $439,952 $186.44 211 126 Yankeetown Lev $92,096 $123.95 236 160 Lee Madison $85,000 $236.11 249 96 Bradenton Manatee $4,568,757 $87.11 45 173 Palmetto Manatee $614,024 $46.74 120 199 Lan boat Key Manatee /Sarasota $58,204 $7.59 146 233 Belleview Marion $47,391 $13.47 188 224 Dunnellon Marion $204,099 $103.60 214 168 Ocala Marion $20,700,326 $422.55 46 50 Jupiter Island Martin $7,370,561 $11,778.49 241 1 Stuart Martin $2,500,355 $150.83 107 142 Aventura Miami-Dade $1,628,227 $55.29 77 193 Bay Harbor Islands Miami-Dade $4,606 $0.89 175 245 Biscayne Park Miami-Dade $878,972 $264.75 194 88 Coral Gables Miami-Dade $24,766,419 $556.99 51 40 El Portal Miami-Dade $596,390 $233.70 205 100 Florida City Miami-Dade $2,706,886 $323.25 142 72 Golden Beach Miami-Dade $117,950 $125.21 232 158 Hialeah Miami-Dade $54,401,961 $235.71 5 97 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $618,168 $30.19 96 210 Homestead Miami-Dade $14,669,860 $371.48 54 58 Key Biscayne Miami-Dade $656,112 $57.43 130 192 Medley Miami-Dade $1,543,811 $1,242.73 228 21 Miami Miami-Dade $229,576,526 $603.33 2 37 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $27,086,238 $296.88 20 76 North Bay Miami-Dade $488,573 $84.32 167 175 North Miami Miami-Dade $21,360,272 $356.22 38 61 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $11,937,520 $289.95 59 79 O a-locka Miami-Dade $32,542,013 $2,086.89 113 7 Pinecrest Miami-Dade $850,819 $43.56 97 201 South Miami Miami-Dade $6,717,983 $631.40 136 35 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $6,648,146 $465.01 115 44 West Miami Miami-Dade $11,282,531 $1,916.98 169 8 Islamorada Monroe $3,119,679 $444.54 153 48 Key West Monroe $24,002,976 $933.61 82 27 Marathon Monroe $4,179,723 $394.13 135 53 Fernandina Beach Nassau $4,128,443 $357.97 129 60 Crestview Okaloosa $3,500,854 $219.64 98 107 Destin Okaloosa $2,043,216 $169.27 128 134 Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $6,8977322 $334.04 95 68 28 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments I Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations unicipality ounty Cumulative Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Ma Esther Okaloosa $1,420,338 $335.08 185 67 Niceville Okaloosa $798,920 $61.96 121 185 Okeechobee Okeechobee $1,515,896 $278.22 171 84 Apopka Orange $625,058 $19.26 63 219 Belle Isle Orange $2,342,464 $385.15 165 55 Maitland Orange $4,098,626 $250.64 111 93 Oakland Orange $1,824 $1.11 216 242 Ocoee Orange $861,870 $0.00 69 250 Orlando Orange $71,005,203 $336.90 6 66 Windermere Orange $1,890,691 $792.20 203 31 Winter Garden Orange $555,031 $24.36 80 216 Winter Park Orange $11,004,622 $394.29 78 52 Kissimmee Osceola $16,280,541 $285.65 37 80 Saint Cloud Osceola $2,690,278 $107.47 75 166 Belle Glade Palm Beach $3,472,181 $232.54 106 102 Boca Raton Palm Beach $27,060,608 $322.88 23 73 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $9,925,891 $150.61 31 143 Delray Beach Palm Beach $16,685,752 $262.40 34 90 Greenacres Palm Beach $438,203 $14.35 72 222 Highland Beach Palm Beach $213,905 $52.50 187 195 Jupiter Palm Beach $11,329,815 $238.39 48 94 Lake Worth Palm Beach $25,894,150 $719.21 64 34 Lantana Palm Beach $1,416,085 $143.98 138 146 Manala an Palm Beach $10,777 $30.36 250 209 North Palm Beach Palm Beach $1,488,769 $118.56 125 161 Ocean Ride Palm Beach $461,952 $280.44 223 83 Pahokee Palm Beach $69,022 $11.36 160 228 Palm Beach Palm Beach $12,576,591 $1,295.52 140 19 Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach $6,418,557 $134.19 50 153 Palm Springs Palm Beach $663,946 $45.75 114 200 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $7,558,793 $233.10 67 101 Royal Palm Beach Palm Beach $2,135,937 $71.84 74 180 South Bay Palm Beach $734,832 $186.79 178 125 Wellington Palm Beach $10,448,509 $188.04 41 124 West Palm Beach Palm Beach $59,089,082 $605.13 17 36 Dade City Pasco $3,336,367 $518.12 155 42 New Port Riche Pasco $702,512 $42.21 108 202 Port Riche Pasco $842,825 $267.49 196 87 Ze h rhills Pasco $9,659 $0.77 124 248 Clearwater Pinellas $15,090,444 $136.75 15 151 Dunedin Pinellas $2,750,759 $73.61 61 179 Largo Pinellas $9,828,131 $132.85 28 154 Madeira Beach Pinellas $810,093 $179.07 182 128 Oldsmar Pinellas $378,497 $27.65 119 212 I Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 29 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations unicipality ount Cumulative. Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Pinellas Park Pinellas $1,969,307 $41.35 49 203 Saint Petersbur Pinellas $41,234,141 $163.21 4 138 Tarpon Springs Pinellas $2,051,039 $88.52 85 171 Treasure Island Pinellas $86,470 $11.52 148 227 Bartow Polk $3,275,517 $208.25 110 113 Dundee Polk $1,182,946 $402.64 197 51 Eagle Lake Palk $696,148 $264.51 204 89 Fort Meade Polk $849,951 $145.84 166 145 Frostproof Polk $3,567,098 $1,197.82 199 22 Haines City Polk $2,147,697 $143.48 102 148 Lake Alfred Polk $28,951 $7.27 186 235 Lakeland Polk $33,388,717 $372.10 21 57 Polk City Polk $1,126,292 $721.98 217 32 Winter Haven Polk $3,834,149 $134.64 73 152 Crescent City Putnam $991,703 $555.51 218 41 Palatka Putnam $3,660,357 $330.99 131 69 Welaka Putnam $137,559 $224.77 242 105 Hastings Saint Johns $16,109 $25.21 238 215 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $31,413,558 $803.50 58 29 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $26,717,757 $204.63 11 117 Gulf Breeze Santa Rosa $6,476,935 $1,122.98 168 24 Jay Santa Rosa $779,899 $1,353.56 244 15 Milton Santa Rosa $4,434,000 $590.65 145 38 Sarasota Sarasota $25,274,884 $462.08 42 46 Venice Sarasota $3,424,825 $161.94 92 139 Altamonte Springs Seminole $3,481,596 $81.82 55 176 Casselberr Seminole $4,093,310 $166.09 84 136 Lake Ma Seminole $1,980,827 $143.62 116 147 Lon wood Seminole $1,796,613 $129.30 118 156 Oviedo Seminole $8,856,273 $293.05 71 78 Sanford Seminole $9,538,602 $206.53 47 115 Winter Springs Seminole $7,813,412 $236.25 66 95 Bushnell Sumter $4,941,384 $2,337.80 212 6 Coleman Sumter $3,320,304 $5,121.51 239 2 Wildwood Sumter $12,238 $3.10 181 239 Live Oak Suwannee $316,046 $48.07 158 198 Per Taylor $8,471 $1.24 156 241 Daytona Beach Volusia $17,739,930 $272.85 33 85 Daytona Beach Shores Volusia $58,448 $12.95 176 225 DeBar Volusia $3,540,794 $196.39 100 121 DeLand Volusia $5,470,051 $225.83 81 104 Deltona Volusia $17,048,257 $208.99 24 112 Edgewater Volusia $3,803,672 $182.76 93 127 Holly Hill Volusia $2,771,554 $219.76 123 106 30 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments I Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 1 1 1 [1 unicipality ounty Cumulative Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Lake Helen Volusia $18,235 $6.55 200 237 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $6,369,638 $296.28 88 77 Orange City Volusia $1,068,837 $129.70 141 155 Ormond Beach Volusia $7,876,096 $200.78 60 120 Ponce Inlet Volusia $5,383 $1.65 195 240 Port Orange Volusia $9,280,514 $174.11 40 131 Sopchoppy Wakulla $154,866 $376.80 248 56 DeFuniak Springs Walton $4,292,427 $797.33 174 30 Freeport Walton $5,064,442 $4,139.94 222 3 Chi le Washington $1,655,766 $467.58 193 43 Statewide Average $9,379,044 $412.22 NA NA Statewide Total $2,344,761,011 NA NA NA Data Sources: Expenditure Data, U5 Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt ://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. E. Grants by Agency At this juncture analysis shifts from identifying where expenditures are occurring to identifying the source of these expenditures. To achieve this, expenditures by agency are examined, first providing a broad summary, second addressing a potential "FEMA Effect," and finally moving on to illustrate expenditures by county and by source for the top awarding agencies. This process provides a clearer picture of where awards from a particular agency end up, and allows for analysis of characteristics of the recipient local governments. Reported expenditures vary from a maximum of $2,783,361,143 for the Department of Homeland Security awards to a minimum of $22,872 for the National Archives and Records Administration awards. As illustrated by Table 2.7 there are numerous agencies that provide grant funds to local governments. A large share of this funding comes primarily from five agencies, as illustrated by Table 2.8. While there have been shifts in the proportion of total reported expenditures coming from each agency over time, these five agencies are the source of approximately 96 percent of cumulative expenditures across the entire time frame, totaling about $6.6 billion. Summary information on awards given by each of these agencies follows. Table 2.7 illustrates expenditures from only 16 agencies, while www.Grants.gov identifies 26 federal grant-making agencies. When the "Other' category from Table 2.7 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 31 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations is considered this total increases to twenty ("Other" includes the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Institute of Museum and Library Services, and the National Science Foundation). Therefore, six federal grant- making agencies exist for which no local governments in Florida reported expenditures. The six agencies on this list are the Agency for International Development, the Department of State, the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Social Security Administration. For four of these agencies the reason for their exclusion is simple, they do not offer grants that local governments are eligible to apply for and are thus excluded ' from the sample. The Department of State and the Agency for International Development do offer grants that local governments can apply for, however there is some ambiguity in what specific local governments are eligible for given that www.Grants.gov identifies both agencies as focusing on the international community. Table 2.7: Local Government Expenditures of Grant Funds b Awarding Agency Federal Agency Cumulative National Archives and Records Administration $22,872 Department of Commerce $33,487,190 Department of Defense $502,466 Department of Homeland Security $2,783,361,143 Department of Transportation $798,437,408 Department of Education $20,529,621 Department of Energy $7,455,170 Environmental Protection Agency $74,005,852 Department of Health and Human Services $971,080,153 Department of Housing and Urban Development $1,454,893,138 Department of Interior $10,459,350 De artment of Justice $348,899,368 Department of Labor $9,375,134 Other - Arts and Sciences $180,771 Corporation for National and Community Service $12,273,842 Small Business Administration $777,516 Department of Agriculture $122,754,840 Department of the Treasury $3,250,493 All Agencies $6,652,949,558 Source: Florida LWH 32 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments I Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Table 2.8: Snare of Local Government Grant txpenaltures • Housing Programs • Community Planning and Development Department of Homeland SecuriV 9 Cumulative Total: $2.78 billion Share of all Grant Expenditures: 42 percent • Federal Emergency Management Agency • Domestic Preparedness and Anti-terrorism Programs Department of Housing and Urban Development Cumulative Total: $1.45 billion Share of all Grant Expenditures: 22 percent Department of Health and Human Services Cumulative Total: $971 million Share of all Grant Expenditures: 15 percent • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services • Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Department of Transportation Cumulative Total. $798 million Share of all Grant Expenditures: 12 percent • Federal Highway Administration • Federal Aviation Administration • Federal Transit Administration Department of Justice Cumulative Total: $348 million Share of all Grant Expenditures: 5 percent • Justice Assistance Grants • COPS Program LCIF 59 Total includes FEMA award expenditures prior to the creation.of DHS. For a full discussion of the establishment of DHS, see Chapter Three, Part A. 1 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Govemments 33 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations F. "FEMA Effect" Over the time frame covered by this report, there has been substantial growth in total reported expenditures, and a substantial shift in the source for these funds. An increasing proportion of reported expenditures comes from Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants in FYs 2004 and 2005, largely due to the hypothesized "FEMA Effect." Naturally, the proportion of total reported expenditures from any other agency drops, but this does not imply that total reported local government expenditures of grants from any of these agencies have necessarily fallen. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) awarded expenditures have increased moderately over the time frame, from approximately $285 million to approximately $300 million while the proportion of total expenditures awarded by this agency has fallen from 32 percent to 19 percent. For other agencies, however, expenditures generally do fall and when expenditures of DHS awards are subtracted from total reported expenditures sourced to all agencies, there is a decrease in FYs 2003 and 2004 with a moderate increase in FY 2005 followed by another decrease in 2006. This phenomenon is partly due to the unusually active hurricane seasons of 2004 and 2005. In order to account for this "FEMA Effect", certain DHS grants are subtracted from the total amounts, with results illustrated in Table 2.9 and shown graphically in Table 2.10. Table 2.9: Annual Reported Expenditures of Eligible Federal Grant Funds FY Total DHS Total less DHS 2002 $909,125,432 $93,928,390 $815,197,042 2003 $963,965,743 $178,971,853 $784,993,890 2004 $1,424,902,213 $680,941,354 $743,960,859 2005 $1,768,972,836 $1,011,980,259 $756,992,577 2006 $1,556,463,485 $817,539,287 $738,924,198 Source: Florida LCIR Table 2.10: Annual Reported Expenditures of Eligible Federal Grant Funds N $2.00 c o $1_$0 $1.60 $1.40 $1.20 $1.00 --*---Total $0.80 ---DHS $0.60 --*-Total less DHS $0.40 $0.20 $0.00 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Source: Florida LCIR 34 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on intergovernmental Relations While this "FEMA Effect" appears to be substantial, including all DHS awards in the effect does not paint a complete picture, leaving out a "9-11 Effect" of increased funding for security initiatives. Since a "9-11 Effect" would indicate a shift in government spending and a "FEMA Effect" would reflect one time events, this analysis will attempt to treat the two separately. Specifically, the "FEMA Effect" is isolated by utilizing CFDA numbers to remove one hurricane mitigation grant and one hurricane recovery grant. The first award program removed is a Public Assistance Grant requiring a Presidential Declaration of Disaster, and the second is a Hazard Mitigation Grant. Table 2.11 illustrates the magnitude of the observed "FEMA Effect," showing that these two programs comprise a majority of DHS grants to local governments and in their absence statewide totals fall substantially over the sample time frame. It should also be noted that for FY 2005 the "FEMA Effect" actually exceeds total reported expenditures for all other award programs as illustrated by Table 2.12. There is one important caveat to this analysis: it is possible that due to the extraordinary nature of the hurricane seasons in 2004 and 2005, expenditures on other projects may have slowed or stalled as efforts to recover from the storms, which affected every part of the state, took the forefront. Despite this possibility, it is believed that based upon the evidence presented in this report the observed stagnation of expenditures represents a broader trend of shifting federal budget priorities. Table 2.11: Annual Reported Expenditures of Elluible Federal Grant Funds FY Total FEMA Effect Total less FEMA Effect 2002 $909,125,432 $91,939,248 $817,186,184 2003 $963,965,743 $167,531,591 $796,721,129 2004 $1,424,902,213 $667,862,047 $757,040,166 2005 $1,768,972,836 $997,525,853 $771,814,825 2006 $1,556,463,485 $756,299,763 $800,163,722 Source: Florida LC;/H Table 2.12: Annual Reported Expenditures of Elinible Federal Grant Funds M $2.00 C ° $1 80 , q° $1 60 . 1 40 $ " --*--Total $1 20 . $1.00 $0$0 tFEMA Effect $0.60 $0.40 f Total less FEMA $0.20 Effect $0 00 . 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Source: Florida LCIR I Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 35 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations G. Adjusted Grant Expenditures by Local Governments Reported expenditures are adjusted to reflect the role of FEMA disaster mitigation and recovery efforts due to the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. This exercise provides a consistent sample of programs which illustrates a clearer picture of the situation faced by local governments than when these awards are included. There are two important concepts illustrated by this adjustment. These concepts both deal with the role of the "FEMA Effect" and how it alters (or does not alter) analytical conclusions. The first concept illustrated by this adjustment is the manner in which the "FEMA Effect" masked a trend of stagnation or moderate growth from all other federal grants. This trend has been introduced and developed previously but still bears acknowledgement in analysis of adjusted expenditures, and is clearly illustrated by annual tables in Appendix A. Despite this trend, local governments are encouraged to view federal grants as a potential revenue source to supplement local funds already budgeted for a public purpose. The second noteworthy concept illustrated by this adjustment is that despite the removal of the "FEMA Effect," total expenditures are still greatest for the largest counties and municipalities. At this point, however, a distinction is made regarding per capita expenditures. While smaller counties and municipalities continue to report the greatest per capita expenditures, it becomes clear that municipalities are generally able to spend more per capita than counties, thus having a greater proportional impact on individual constituents. It was previously suggested that smaller local governments might be at an advantage in per capita terms so that the effect upon individual citizens would be proportionally larger for small local governments. This statement should be modified to be more inclusive and reflect the reality that size is not the sole determinant of the impact grant-seeking can have on constituents; thus, small, medium, and large local governments should be encouraged to engage in the process. Additionally, a further distinction must be made between counties and municipalities at this point, since it appears that the adjustment was of a larger magnitude and proportion for counties. As a general rule, larger local governments are able to draw down (eventually turning into expenditures) greater total amounts of federal funds; however, on a per capita basis, there is a distinction between counties and municipalities with smaller municipalities being able to have a greater proportional effect on individual constituents (as measured by per capita expenditures). 1. County Governments When expenditures from the grants identified as the primary hurricane mitigation and recovery grants are removed, a clearer picture emerges. Total expenditures now range from $808,601,414 by Miami-Dade County as illustrated in Table 2.13 to $3,692 by Bradford County. With these changes made, the counties with the ten highest 36 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments I Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovemmental Relations expenditures are now also the counties with the ten largest populations in the sampleW (the top five rankings are actually identical). These results reinforce the reality that larger local governments have more resources to devote to grant-seeking, and additionally reflect the primary role of formula grants that are largely dependent upon population for distribution formulas. The magnitude of the "FEMA Effect" can be substantial. Miami-Dade spent approximately $430 million in hurricane mitigation and recovery funds; removing this "FEMA Effect" leads to a decrease of approximately 32 percent of total expenditures. Table 2.13: Exoenditures of Federal Grants by Counties County 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami-Dade $808,601,414 1 Palm Beach $282,063,223 3 Broward $280,485,213 2 Hillsborough $211,989,540 4 Orange $175,851,985 5 Lee $113,903,044 8 Pinellas $102,777,545 6 Volusia $95,593,321 11 Polk $60,959,903 9 Brevard $46,368,448 10 Source: Florida LCIR When the adjustment is performed and resulting per capita expenditures are calculated, the results present a more balanced picture than either total expenditures adjusted for the "FEMA Effect" or unadjusted per capita expenditures. Per capita expenditures range from a maximum of $527.02 by Monroe County as illustrated in Table 2.14 to a minimum of $0.13 by Bradford County. The most and least populous counties are represented, as are counties of moderate size, and not surprisingly, expenditures have dropped significantly. In fact, the highest adjusted per capita expenditures by county governments are less than half of the largest unadjusted per capita expenditures by county governments. Furthermore, Escambia, De Soto, and Santa Rosa counties have all dropped out of the list of the top ten per capita expenditures, suggesting that unadjusted expenditure data for these three counties was substantially overstated due to the hurricane mitigation and recovery grants that comprise the "FEMA Effect." 80 While 2005 population rankings list Volusia as the 11th ranking county in terms of population, it is in fact the tenth most populated county in the sample, since Jacksonville/Duval County is treated as a municipality. 1 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Govemments 37 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Table 2.14: Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grants b Counties County 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Monroe $527.02 37 Calhoun $473.45 63 Miami-Dade $341.28 2 DeSoto $287.42 48 Palm Beach $227.78 3 Lee $217.84 8 Volusia $198.68 11 Hillsborough $191.56 4 Libert $182.07 67 Okaloosa $181.85 24 Source: Florida LCIR Cumulative and per capita expenditure data for the entire sample of counties are available in Table 2.15. Annual totals for expenditures and per capita expenditures are available in Appendix C. Table 2.15: Adiusted Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by (minty Count Cumulative Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Alachua $5,978,771 $25.30 22 51 Baker $466,136 $18.89 51 56 Bay $1,569,520 $9.11 25 60 Bradford $3,692 $0.13 48 64 Brevard $46,368,448 $89.00 9 20 Broward $280,485,213 $163.45 2 12 Calhoun $6,589,789 $473.45 62 2 Charlotte $6,156,101 $39.84 27 37 Citrus $7,188,719 $55.03 31 30 Cla $4,822,147 $30.33 24 44 Collier $31,499,374 $103.46 14 18 Columbia $499,795 $8.55 39 61 DeSoto $9,552,818 $287.42 47 4 Dixie $1,094,732 $72.77 58 24 Escambia $45,819,718 $150.13 16 13 Fla ler $2,988,922 $42.10 34 35 Franklin $220,005 $20.41 63 55 Gadsden $1,302,150 $27.48 42 48 Gilchrist $439,732 $26.44 56 49 Glades $891,442 $82.94 64 22 Gulf $659,247 $40.05 57 36 Hamilton $934,939 $66.58 60 26 Hardee $2,847,467 $104.35 50 17 Hendry NA . NA 45 NA Hernando $6,778,015 $45.58 28 33 Hillsborough $211,989,540 $191.56 4 8 38 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments I Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations County Holmes Indian River ' Jackson Jefferson Lafayette Lake Lee Leon Madison Manatee Marion Martin Miami-Dade Monroe Nassau Okaloosa Okeechobee Orange Osceola Palm Beach Pasco Pinellas Polk Putnam Saint Johns Saint Lucie Santa Rosa Sarasota Seminole Sumter Suwannee Union Volusia Wakulla Walton Washington Statewide Aver Statewide Total Cumulative :xpenditures $599,002 $6,248,058 $2,217,749 NA $8,556,969 $113,903,044 $3,635,422 $941,399 $1,349,617 $1,230,667 $37,897,504 $11,536,628 $9,787,784 $808,601,414 $42,654,506 $1,469,247 $33,760,260 $1,099,175 $175,851,985 $37,189,303 $102,777,545 $60,959,903 $2,187,105 $9,490,904 $15,052,085 $4,931,540 $30,913,393 $31,192,808 $1,091,131 $523,218 $97,090 3 $164,282 $41,651,356 624.199.733 Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures $31.51 $49.22 $45.18 $46.18 NA $33.79 $217.84 $13.98 $24.85 $182.07 $62.11 $127.37 $38.56 $70.58 $341.28 $527.02 $21.92 $181.85 $29.55 $173.58 $26.27 $227.78 $95.32 $108.95 $114.99 $29.85 $60.63 $64.79 $36.66 $86.21 $77.19 $30.95 $29.12 $24.55 $6.89 $198.68 $36.52 $10.89 $7.25 $92.21 NA 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank 55 42 32 31 41 34 61 32 65 NA 18 41 7 6 19 57 43 52 66 9 54 28 17 14 15 38 29 25 1 3 36 1 38 54 23 10 46 46 5 11 21 50 3 5 11 19 6 16 8 15 37 45 26 29 20 27 30 39 13 21 12 23 35 43 44 47 53 53 59 63 10 7 49 40 40 59 52 62 NA NA NA NA Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htto://harvester.census. aov/sac/d issem/accessootions. htm I?su bm it=Retrieve+Records- Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. I Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 39 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 2. Municipal Governments Adjusting total expenditures has no effect on the composition of the top ten municipalities in terms of total expenditures, only on the order in which they appear. Total expenditures now range from a maximum of $200,085,108 by Miami in Miami- Dade County as illustrated in Table 2.16 to a minimum $361 by Archer in Alachua County. Adjustments are naturally smaller in magnitude for municipalities than for counties. This difference in magnitude is due largely to the simple fact that municipalities generally report lower levels of expenditures than counties; therefore, any adjustment will be of lesser magnitude. Table 2.16: Expenditures of Eligible Federal Grants by Municipalities Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami $200,085,108 2 Jacksonville $151,775,710 1 Tama $95,483,657 3 Fort Lauderdale $73,313,105 8 Tallahassee $66,328,462 7 Orlando $45,931,896 6 Hialeah $43,825,091 5 West Palm Beach $41,607,115 19 Saint Petersburg $38,750,807 4 Gainesville $34,105,593 14 Source: Florida LCIR The adjustment to per capita expenditures also has relatively little effect on the top ten ' municipalities.61 Per capita expenditures now range from a maximum of $5,055.01 by Coleman in Sumter County, as illustrated in Table 2.17, to a minimum of $0.19 by Niceville in Okaloosa County. Table 2.17: Per Capita Expenditures of Eligible Federal Grants b Municipalities Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Coleman $5,055.01 352 Freeport $4,139.94 317 White Springs $2,611.89 356 Everglades $2,378.95 362 Bushnell $2,294.23 273 Apalachicola $1,901.71 260 Lawte $1,811.01 348 Sneads $1,473.77 281 Jay $1,353.56 362 Alford $1,273.73 238 Source: Florida LCIR 61 USDA Rural Water and Waste Disposal Program is included in these totals, which requires that outstanding bonds be counted as an expenditure each year. This program affects all municipalities in the top ten per capita except Freeport and White Springs. 40 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Cumulative and per capita expenditure data for the entire sample of municipalities is available in Table 2.18. Annual totals for expenditures and per capita expenditures are available in Appendix B. Municipalities whose reported expenditures are exclusively due to the " FEMA Effect" are retained in the sample for illustrative purposes but cumulative and cumulative per capita expenditures are listed as not applicable. These municipalities are: Mexico Beach, Macclenny, Malabar, Southwest Ranches, Punta Gorda, Yankeetown, Hialeah Gardens, Key Biscayne, Medley, Destin, Belle Isle, Windermere, Ocean Ridge, Hastings, Moore Haven, Lady Lake, Longboat Key, Biscayne Park, El Portal, Golden Beach, North Bay, Pinecrest, Wellington, and Sopchoppy. Ti%hla 9 12• Arlhoatarl Fvnanrliftsraa of Farlaral Brant Awards. 6v Municinallty unicipali 62 ounty Cumulative Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Alachua Alachua $438,638 $57.56 148 111 Archer Alachua $361 $0.29 231 NA Gainesville Alachua $34,105,593 $296.56 14 38 Hawthorne Alachua $788,000 $576.44 228 20 High Springs Alachua $4,316,839 $999.89 181 15 Macclenn Baker $0 $0.00 174 NA Cedar Grove Bay $7,516,599 $1,262.81 163 11 Lynn Haven Bay $740,121 $53.94 109 113 Mexico Beach Bay $0 $0.00 232 NA Panama City Bay $4,482,496 $120.96 62 79 Panama City Beach Bay $140,842 $16.79 140 157 Parker Bay $0 $0.00 178 NA Springfield Bay $104,648 $11.74 144 173 Hampton Bradford $5,005 $11.83 248 172 Lawte Bradford $1,249,594 $1,811.01 238 7 Starke Bradford $189,272 $32.28 165 139 Cocoa Brevard $3,394,049 $201.10 104 53 Cocoa Beach Brevard $197,638 $15.37 123 163 Malabar Brevard $0 $0.00 202 NA Melbourne Brevard $17,555,402 $235.77 27 45 Palm Bay Brevard $6,529,147 $73.12 19 99 Rockledge Brevard $163,845 $6.96 83 191 Satellite Beach Brevard $114,641 $10.52 134 180 Titusville Brevard $3,447,343 $80.51 52 95 Cooper City Broward $273,689 $9.62 76 182 Coral Springs Broward $4,378,055 $34.70 13 137 Dania Beach Broward $1,400,499 $50.36 79 120 Davie Broward $3,865,403 $47.78 26 123 62 Municipalities not appearing in Table 2.6 or Table 2.15 did not report expenditures that would require the filing of a Federal Single Audit, and are thus not part of this data set. Municipalities included in Table 2.6 but not Table 2.15 only reported expenditures associated with the "FEMA Effect." Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 41 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations unicipality ount Cumulative Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Deerfield Beach Broward $3,522,926 $50.44 29 119 Fort Lauderdale Broward $73,313,105 $437.47 8 26 Hallandale Beach Broward $2,449,939 $69.68 65 101 Hollywood Broward $21,707,753 $152.22 12 69 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $262,816 $8.17 70 185 Lauderhill Broward $2,125,406 $35.26 35 136 Margate Broward $4,188,949 $76.50 43 97 Miramar Broward $4,782,619 $47.45 16 124 North Lauderdale Broward $2,408,769 $62.88 57 106 Oakland Park Broward $2,480,619 $75.02 56 98 Parkland Broward $26,997 $1.39 90 210 Pembroke Park Broward $308,700 $46.91 171 125 Pembroke Pines Broward $5,650,816 $37.82 10 133 Plantation Broward $3,933,279 $46.45 25 126 Pompano Beach Broward $10,710,467 $117.92 18 81 Southwest Ranches Broward $0 $0.00 150 NA Sunrise Broward $5,575,516 $62.94 22 105 Tamarac Broward $3,062,884 $53-09 39 114 Weston Broward $211,364 $3.43 36 202 Wilton Manors Broward $128,103 $10.43 128 181 Altha Calhoun $60,681 $109.34 244 83 Blountstown Calhoun $167,129 $68.14 211 102 Punta Gorda Charlotte $0 $0.00 105 NA Crystal River Citrus $55,930 $15.69 192 162 Green Cove Springs Clay $38,752 $6.62 162 194 Everglades Collier $1,211,299 $2,378.95 246 4 Marco Island Collier $345,413 $22.06 112 150 Naples Collier $946,510 $42.00 87 131 Lake City Columbia $1,155,071 $108.42 135 84 Arcadia De Soto $177,277 $25.87 158 146 Cross City___ Dixie $81,165 $45.37 220 128 Atlantic Beach Duval $195,460 $14.05 117 167 Baldwin Duval $97,799 $59.71 226 108 Jacksonville Duval $151,775,710 $190.25 1 55 Jacksonville Beach Duval $1,264,964 $59.51 94 109 Neptune Beach Duval $113,302 $15.70 153 161 Pensacola Escambia $29,164,163 $524.89 44 23 Bunnell Fla ler $522,151 $207.78 208 51 Palm Coast Fla ler $49,113 $1.28 30 211 Fla ler Beach Fla lerNolusia $4,886 $0.88 173 217 Apalachicola Franklin $4,546,268 $1,901.71 209 6 Carrabelle Franklin $1,194,614 $931.95 230 17 Chattahoochee Gadsden $1,759,735 $451.10 190 25 Greensboro Gadsden $21,040 $33.13 241 138 Havana Gadsden $11,812 $6.88 221 193 42 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 1 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations unicipality ount Cumulative Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Cumulative 2006 Per Capita Population Expenditures Rank Rank Quincy Gadsden $52,740 $7.29 152 188 Fannin Springs Gilchrist/Lev $9,800 $11.21 234 178 Moore Haven Glades $0 $0.00 225 NA Port Saint Joe Gulf $64,193 $17.67 191 155 White Springs Hamilton $2,083,752 $2,611.89 236 3 Bowling Green Hardee $2,991 $0.99 199 215 Wauchula Hardee $4,110,650 $942.26 184 16 Zolfo Springs Hardee $44,825 $26.97 227 143 Brooksville Hernando $317,677 $43.63 151 129 Avon Park Highlands $1,853,925 $215.10 145 50 Lake Placid Highlands $16,035 $9.35 222 184 Sebring Highlands $1,736,848 $172.47 138 59 Plant City Hillsborou h $3,215,285 $100.31 68 89 Tama Hillsborough $95,483,657 $296.91 3 37 Temple Terrace Hillsborough $177,223 $8.08 86 186 Bonifa Holmes $3,073,467 $1,126.40 203 12 Fellsmere Indian River $1,800 $0.45 180 221 Indian River Shores Indian River $865 $0.24 193 224 Sebastian Indian River $3,237,691 $166.35 91 62 Vero Beach Indian River $7,798,362 $434.19 101 28 Alford Jackson $622,493 $1,273.73 247 10 Graceville Jackson $67,546 $27.57 210 142 Grand Ride Jackson $187,647 $207.26 235 52 Marianna Jackson $6,656,468 $1,023.77 160 14 Sneads Jackson $2,885,643 $1,473.77 216 8 Monticello Jefferson $265,292 $104.73 207 86 Clermont Lake $11,261 $0.82 89 218 Eustis Lake $236,365 $14.14 103 166 Lad Lake Lake $0 $0.00 122 NA Leesburg Lake $2,228,469 $130.46 99 76 Mascotte Lake $32,534 $9.38 185 183 Mount Dora Lake $278,367 $25.94 133 145 Tavares Lake $22,416 $2.02 127 207 Bonita Springs Lee $315,567 $7.25 53 190 Cape Coral Lee $6,686,643 $49.25 9 122 Fort Myers Lee $8,124,223 $140.21 32 72 Fort Myers Beach Lee $1,634,582 $238.20 155 43 Sanibel Lee $1,443,240 $229.31 164 46 Tallahassee Leon $66,328,462 $395.26 7 31 Chiefland Lev $44,403 $21.49 214 152 Williston Lev $315,216 $132.84 212 75 Yankeetown Lev $0 $0.00 237 NA Lee Madison $85,000 $236.11 250 44 Bradenton Manatee $4,144,242 $79.04 45 96 Palmetto Manatee $598,338 $45.56 120 127 I Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 43 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations unicipality Longboat Key Belleview Dunnellon Ocala Jupiter Island ounty Manatee/Sarasota Marion Marion Marion Martin Cumulative Expenditures $0 $47,391 $78,185 $14,106,074 $2,000 Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures $0.00 $13.47 $39.69 $286.88 $3.21 Cumulative 2006 Per Capita Population Expenditures Rank Rank 147 NA 189 168 215 132 46 40 242 203 Stuart Aventura Martin Miami-Dade $61,194 $10,000 $3.69 $0.34 107 200 77 222 Bay Harbor Islands Biscayne Park Coral Gables Miami-Dade Miami-Dade Miami-Dade $4,606 $0 $305,434 $0.89 $0.00 $6.88 176 216 195 NA 51 192 El Portal Florida City Miami-Dade Miami-Dade $0 $2,685,125 $0.00 $320.75 206 NA 143 33 Golden Beach Miami-Dade . $0 $0.00 233 NA Hialeah Miami-Dade $43,825,091 $189.45 5 56 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $0 $0.00 96 NA Homestead Miami-Dade $6,962,351 $191.20 54 54 Key Biscayne Miami-Dade $0 $0.00 131 NA Medley Miami-Dade $0 $0.00 229 NA Miami Miami-Dade $200,085,108 $527.71 2 22 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $25,021,677 $274.68 20 41 North Bay North Miami Miami-Dade Miami-Dade $0 $10,217,109 $0.00 $170.32 168 NA 38 60 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $6,315,512 $152.45 59 68 O a-locka Miami-Dade $821,274 $52.50 113 115 Pinecrest Miami-Dade $0 $0.00 97 NA South Miami Miami-Dade $3,294,245 $306.95 137 36 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $367,965 $25.79 115 147 West Miami Miami-Dade $314,611 $51.71 170 117 Islamorada Monroe $116,205 $16.62 154 158 Key West Monroe $8,290,081 $320.75 82 34 Marathon Fernandina Beach Monroe Nassau $123,500 $3,551,183 $11.65 $307.95 136 174 130 35 Crestview Okaloosa $2,504,463 $161.19 98 64 Destin Okaloosa $0 $0.00 129 NA Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $1,781,844 $86.35 95 94 Ma Esther Okaloosa $77,696 $18.47 186 154 Niceville Okaloosa $2,515 $0.19 121 225 Okeechobee Okeechobee $1,214,523 $222.85 172 47 Apopka Orange $382,179 $11.89 63 171 Belle Isle Orange $0 $0.00 166 NA Maitland - -Orange $91,525 $5.72 111 199 Oakland Orange $1,824 $1.11 217 214 Ocoee -- Orange $861,870 $0.00 69 238 Orlando Orange $45,931,896 $219.93 6 48 Windermere Oran a $0 $0.00 204 NA 44 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 1 1 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations unicipality ount Cumulative Ex enditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Winter Garden Orange $186,967 $8.01 80 187 Winter Park Orange $480,377 $17.43 78 156 Kissimmee Osceola $7,611,183 $133.29 37 74 Saint Cloud Osceola $531,886 $19.13 75 153 Belle Glade Palm Beach $1,876,808 $125.93 106 77 Boca Raton Palm Beach $5,430,760 $66.05 23 104 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $4,088,112 $62.86 31 107 Delray Beach Palm Beach $5,625,815 $89.35 34 93 Greenacres Palm Beach $176,833 $5.79 72 198 Highland Beach Palm Beach $58,312 $14.68 188 165 Jupiter Palm Beach $1,051,957 $23.35 48 149 Lake Worth Palm Beach $413,056 $11.51 64 176 Lantana Palm Beach $11,984 $1.20 139 213 Manala an Palm Beach $1,000 $2.82 251 205 North Palm Beach Palm Beach $843,497 $67.19 126 103 Ocean Ride Palm Beach $0 $0.00 224 NA Pahokee Palm Beach $69,022 $11.36 161 177 Palm Beach Palm Beach $160,928 $16.58 141 159 Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach $811,377 $16.56 50 160 Palm Springs Palm Beach $50,409 $3.47 114 201 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $4,785,097 $149.25 67 70 Royal Palm Beach Palm Beach $372,856 $12.59 74 170 South Bay Palm Beach $734,832 $186.79 179 57 Wellington Palm Beach $0 $0.00 41 NA West Palm Beach Palm Beach $41,607,115 $434.35 17 27 Dade City Pasco $3,336,367 $518.12 156 24 New Port Riche Pasco $702,512 $42.21 108 130 Port Riche Pasco $842,825 $267.49 197 42 Ze h rhills Pasco $9,659 $0.77 125 219 Clearwater Pinellas $13,140,438 $119.11 15 80 Dunedin Pinellas $1,869,122 $49.99 61 121 Largo Pinellas $8,304,869 $112.33 28 82 Madeira Beach Pinellas $733,655 $162.16 183 63 Oldsmar Pinellas $321,497 $23.51 119 148 Pinellas Park Pinellas $1,797,961 $37.81 49 134 Saint Petersburg Pinellas $38,750,807 $153.41 4 67 Tarpon Springs Pinellas $1,170,096 $50.92 85 118 Treasure Island Pinellas $86,470 $11.52 149 175 Bartow Polk $1,586,445 $100.73 110 88 Dundee Polk $1,182,946 $402.64 198 30 Eagle Lake Polk $583,430 $219.80 205 49 Fort Meade Polk $86,561 $14.85 167 164 Frostproof Polk $3,265,709 $1,096.61 200 13 Haines City Polk $1,478,346 $99.44 102 90 Lake Alfred Polk $28,951 $7.27 187 189 ' Federal Grants to Florida's Local Govemments 45 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations unicipality ounty Cumulative Expenditures Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Cumulative Per Capita Expenditures Rank Lakeland Polk $14,036,755 $156.89 21 66 Polk City Polk $1,126,292 $721.98 218 19 Winter Haven Polk $2,975,077 $104.75 73 85 Crescent City Putnam $991,703 $555.51 219 21 Palatka Putnam $3,175,671 $286.92 132 39 Welaka Putnam $98,206 $157.38 243 65 Hastin s Saint Johns $0 $0.00 239 NA Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $3,594,809 $90.00 58 92 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $11,919,951 $93.96 11 91 Gulf Breeze Santa Rosa $64,491 $11.15 169 179 Jay Santa Rosa $779,899 $1,353.56 245 9 Milton Santa Rosa $1,251,043 $167.93 146 61 Sarasota Sarasota $23,165,285 $423.46 42 29 Venice Sarasota $2,595,165 $121.85 92 78 Altamonte Springs Seminole . $59,326 $1.40 55 209 Casselberr Seminole $1,707,870 $69.85 84 100 Lake Ma Seminole $8,196 $0.59 116 220 Longwood Seminole $33,130 $2.38 118 206 Oviedo Seminole $1,549,536 $52.46 71 116 Sanford Seminole $4,762,933 $102.89 47 87 Winter Springs Seminole $1,044,385 $31.46 66 141 Bushnell Sumter $4,841,228 $2,294.23 213 5 Coleman Sumter $3,277,000 $5,055.01 240 1 Wildwood Sumter $12,238 $3.10 182 204 Live Oak Suwannee $211,531 $32.18 159 140 Per Taylor $8,471 $1.24 157 212 Daytona Beach Volusia $11,787,155 $181.35 33 58 Daytona Beach Shores Volusia $58,448 $12.95 177 169 DeBar Volusia $106,368 $5.84 100 197 DeLand Volusia $3,358,944 $137.39 81 73 Deltona Volusia $1,712,678 $21.92 24 151 Edgewater Volusia $130,647 $6.18 93 196 Holly Hill Volusia $693,341 $55.01 124 112 Lake Helen Volusia $18,235 $6.55 201 195 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $3,135,646 $146.87 88 71 Orange City Volusia $218,756 $26.80 142 144 Ormond Beach Volusia $2,294,558 $58.14 60 110 Ponce Inlet Volusia $5,383 $1.65 196 208 Port Orange Volusia $1,922,830 $36.05 40 135 Sopchoppy Wakulla $0 $0.00 249 NA DeFuniak Springs Walton $4,132,539 $767.67 175 18 Freeport Walton $5,064,442 $4,139.94 223 2 Chi le Washington $1,375,834 $388.75 194 32 46 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 1 1 1 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Cumulative Cumulative Per 2006 Per Capita Cumulative Capita Population Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Rank Rank Statewide Average $5,283,922 $197.75 NA NA Statewide total $1,310,412,609 NA NA NA Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt ://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 47 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations This page was intentionally left blank. 48 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments [ - I 1 1 1 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations CHAPTER THREE Agency Totals by Local Government In this chapter, county and municipal governments will once again be analyzed separately based upon the justification previously established; this will be done for each of the top five awarding agencies, and implications of respective agency totals are discussed. Total and per capita figures are again provided for a measure of the aggregate impact to the unit of local government, as well as the proportional impact on individual constituents. Annual totals are used initially to reinforce and explain previously introduced trends as well as to illustrate shifts in agency funding levels. Table 3.1 presents aggregate annual expenditures for all local governments in Florida, and serves to illustrate trends which should be kept in mind when interpreting the fiscal data presented in this chapter. There is a substantial increase in Department of Homeland Security (DHS) awards while awards from other agencies have typically been stagnant. This implies that while DHS awards will be concentrated in FYs 2004, 2005, and 2008, awards from other agencies should be distributed evenly across years (for annual agency totals see appendices). Furthermore, as DHS awards increase, awards from other agencies will make up a smaller percentage of total awards despite their totals remaining relatively constant. Table 3.1: Annual Local Government Expenditures b Agency Billions $1.25 $1.00 tDHS $0.75 t DOT --?HHS -T $0.50 HUD -?c--DOJ $0.25 $0,00 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Source: Florida LCIR Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 49 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations A. Department of Homeland Security Award Expenditures Department of Homeland Security (DHS) awards require a greater degree of explanation than awards from other agencies analyzed in this project for the simple reason that DHS did not exist at the beginning of the sample time frame. First, the re- organization process surrounding the creation of DHS will be examined, followed by implications for this report and a brief explanation of how staff was able to account for this merging of responsibilities under DHS in the data collection process. DHS was established by the Homeland Security Act of 200263 which defines the agency's mission as preventing terrorist attacks, reducing domestic vulnerability to terrorism, and minimizing damage and assisting in recovery in the case of terrorist attacks. 64 Twenty-two federal agencies, including FEMA, were united on March 1, 2003 to form DHS.65 Initially, these agencies were organized under four major directorates with the overarching mission met through the operation of the four directorates, each of which included parts drawn from multiple federal agencies. Furthermore, this unprecedented government restructuring incorporated the several autonomous agencies into DHS, reporting directly to the Secretary. Subsequently, DHS has re-organized based upon a six-point agenda. These points are designed to result in changes that will: 66 1. Increase overall preparedness, particularly for catastrophic events 2. Create better transportation security systems to move people and cargo more securely and efficiently 3. Strengthen border security and interior enforcement and reform immigration processes; 4. Enhance information sharing with our partners 5. Improve DHS financial management, human resource development, procurement and information technology 6. Realign the DHS organization to maximize mission performance. In the pursuit of these goals the simple model previously introduced has been abandoned, with three directorates abolished and the agencies which they composed either re-organized under one of two new directorates or operating with greater independence. Currently, DHS operates under a structure where directorates and agencies comprise the main components supplemented by The Office of the Secretary and various advisory panels and committees. A complete list of department " Pub. L. 107-296 (2002). 64 Homeland Security Act of 2002, Title 1, Section 101, hftp://www.dhs.gov/xabout/laws/law regulation rule 0011.shtm. Department of Homeland Security Celebrates Four Years, hftp://www.dhs.gov/xabout/histor//gc 1172594004145;_shtm. Department Six-Point Agenda, http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/history/editorial 0646.shtm. 50 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 1 [l Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations subcomponents and agencies67 is available at the DHS website, as is a list of the current location for each of the original 22 agencies.68 Effective March 2007, implementation of the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act shifted additional functions that were formerly under one of the newly created directorates to the purview of FEMA, and although these changes are not reflected in the current data set one relevant development is the transfer of the "Office of Grants Programs" to FEMA.69 This will certainly prove relevant in the future given the prevalence of the "FEMA Effect" that has been introduced. It bears repeating that a shift in federal priorities pertaining to grants that local governments are eligible to apply for due to the attacks of September 11, 2001 is also captured within this analysis. This shift in federal spending is entirely independent of the "FEMA Effect." Data collection accounted for these reorganizations by tracking individual grant programs through CFDA program numbers referenced in the "Historical Profile of Catalog Programs."70 This process allows for the inclusion or exclusion of hurricane mitigation and recovery grants associated with the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons as necessitated by the specific analysis. When examining aggregate totals that include all agencies, these grants were removed; however, they are included in the summary of DHS grants because they are central to the agency's mission. DHS awarded expenditures are significant for the sample time frame given that they comprise the largest single source of awards for expenditure data. Furthermore, these totals contain the "FEMA Effect" that was previously identified and discussed and, as such, limited conclusions should be drawn based upon this data. The most important concept to understand in interpreting this data is that most expenditures from the awards identified as having their source at DHS comprise the "FEMA Effect" and are concentrated in FYs 2004 and 2005. These awards mask expenditures that are essentially stagnant for awards sourced to other agencies in these years. Expenditures of DHS awards increase vastly over the sample time frame and without the proper context mistaken interpretations can be drawn pertaining to both DHS awards specifically and grants to Florida's local governments in general. The conclusion that is supported by the analysis is quite simple: expenditures of DHS awards, specifically FEMA disaster mitigation and recovery programs, have increased substantially due to the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. Without this "FEMA Effect" grants from DHS have been relatively stagnant, as is the case for statewide totals including all other agencies. 67 Department Subcomponents and Agencies, http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/. 68 History: Who Became Part of the Department, http://www.dhsgov/xabout/history/editorial 0133.shtm. 69 Implementation of the Post Katrina Emergency Reform Act and Other Organizational Changes, hftp://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/gc 1169243598416.shtm#content. MA grants were absorbed into DHS and staff accounted for this through use of the CFDA "Historical Profile of Catalog Programs," http://12.46.245.173/CFDA/pdf/hist crosswalk.pdf. This index identifies changes made to CFDA Program Numbers allowing the "FEMA Effect" grants to be linked to their predecessor programs. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 51 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 1. County Governments Expenditures range from a maximum of $534,945,208 by Miami-Dade County to a minimum of $106,316 by Columbia County. Table 3.2 illustrates the top ten counties in terms of expenditures, and helps to show the effect of hurricane mitigation and recovery grants awarded by FEMA, which make up a large share of expenditures of DHS grants. Per capita expenditures range from a maximum of $1,386.98 by Calhoun County to a minimum of $1.81 by Columbia County; the counties reporting the top ten per capita expenditures of DHS funds are illustrated in Table 3.3. Generally larger local governments report the highest levels of total expenditures and smaller local governments report higher per capita expenditures. The obvious exceptions to this are Escambia, Santa Rosa, and Charlotte counties which reported sizable expenditures of the "FEMA Effect." Escambia and Santa Rosa counties were struck by Hurricane Ivan on September 24, 2004, which was the most destructive hurricane to affect the area in more than 100 years." Charlotte County was struck by Hurricane Charley on August 13, 2004, which was, at the time, the strongest hurricane since Andrew. 72 Table 32 Expenditures of Department of Homeland Securltv Grants Count 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami-Dade $534,945,208 1 Escambia $230,754,407 17 Palm Beach $97,834,514 3 Orange $73,063,879 5 Santa Rosa $66,388,307 31 Charlotte $54,641,169 28 Broward $47,446,382 2 Polk $43,246,392 9 Volusia $40,768,285 11 Brevard $40,602,548 10 Source: Florida LCIR Table 3.3: Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grants Count 2002-2006 Cumulative per capita Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Calhoun $1,386.98 63 Escambia $757.60 17 Desoto $519.23 48 Santa Rosa $486.30 31 Hardee $479.44 51 Holmes $372.60 56 Charlotte $350.69 28 Liberty $289.71 67 Washington $275.04 53 Martin $254.99 30 Source: Florida LCIR 71 National Hurricane Center, Tropical Cyclone Report, Hurricane Ivan; http://www.nhe.noaa.gov/2004ivan.shtml. 77 National Hurricane Center, Tropical Cyclone Report, Hurricane Charlie; htt ://www.nhc.noaa. ov/2004charle .shtml. 52 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 2. Municipal Governments DHS awards to municipalities appear to be more dependent upon location, specifically as it pertains to the role of hurricane mitigation and recovery grants. Cumulative expenditures are illustrated in Table 3.4, they range from a high of $60,592,819 by Pensacola in Escambia County to $1,623 by Baldwin in Dixie County. Per capita expenditures range from $11,775.28 by Jupiter Island in Martin County as illustrated in Table 3.5 to $0.53 by New Port Richey in Pasco County. Per capita expenditures are also dependent upon hurricane mitigation and recovery grants; however, it is clear that with the notable exceptions of Fort Pierce, Opa-Locka, and Lake Worth per capita expenditures are higher for smaller areas in general, meaning that the previously observed trend holds even in this instance. Total expenditures are higher for larger municipalities, while per capita expenditures are higher for smaller municipalities, although the relationship does appear weaker in this instance. Table 3.4: Expenditures of Department of Homeland Securltv Grants Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative __Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Pensacola $60,592,819 45 Fort Lauderdale $50,921,044 8 Pembroke Pines $33,088,213 10 O a-Locka $31,720,739 120 Miami $30,359,201 2 Fort Pierce $27,818,749 61 Holl ood $27,356,773 12 Lake Worth $25,481,094 65 Orlando $25,399,612 6 Plantation $25,047,101 26 Source: Florida LGIR Table 3.5: Per Capita Expenditure s of Department of Homeland Security Grants Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Jupiter Island $11,775.28 356 O a-Locka $2,034.39 120 West Miami $1,865.27 204 Everglades $1,712.80 363 Southwest Ranches $1,305.19 177 Palm Beach $1,294.35 164 Medley $1,242.73 317 Gulf Breeze $1,111.83 202 Pensacola $1,103.34 45 Sanibel $1,068.65 194 Source: Florida LGIR Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 53 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations B. Department of Housing and Urban Development Award Expenditures The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) was established in 1965; however, its origins can be traced to the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), which was a part of the New Deal introduced by President Franklin Roosevelt. Currently, HUD defines its mission as promoting homeownership, supporting community and economic development, and expanding the supply of affordable housing through strategic goals. The billions of dollars HUD allocates to states, local governments, and non-profit organizations are used to further these goals. Furthermore, as a part of HUD, the FHA insures millions of home loans across the country which helps lower the cost of a mortgage for lower income families. Due to the broad nature of HUD's mission, the agency uses numerous and varied means to achieve its goals, and performs self-assessments in order to increase efficiency. Recently, HUD has begun to focus on expanding outreach to grassroots community organizations and on March 31, 2006, issued an updated strategic plan to Congress. This new plan does not alter the agency's mission or strategic goals; instead, it "specified new means, strategies, and management initiatives that will be used to accomplish its mission."73 The Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight was established "to develop a Department-wide perspective on grants management; strengthen internal controls and enhance management integrity by separating the duties and responsibilities of those establishing program policy from those selecting grantees; and, improve management efficiencies by streamlining procedures, facilitating implementation of best practices from other agencies, and improving internal controls." The establishment of this office reflects the fact that the means to accomplishing HUD's goals are largely intermediaries, such as the government or non-profit entities that seek grants from the agency. HUD also maintains local offices. In Florida, these offices are located in Jacksonville, Miami, Orlando, and Tampa. Each office covers a respective region of the state with the Jacksonville office having jurisdiction over most of north Florida, giving it the largest geographical coverage and the most counties (36). The other offices, Miami (10 counties); Orlando (9 counties); and Tampa (12 counties) cover more densely populated regions and thus have smaller coverage areas and fewer counties within their jurisdiction. Contact information and jurisdiction is available via the HUD website.75 In addition to these offices, HUD also maintains a website dedicated to Florida, which highlights events and programs in the state and the southeast regions.76 73 HUD's Strategic Plan for FYs 2006-2011, http_//www.hud.gov/offices/cfo/stratplan.cfm, 74 Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight, hftp://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/dgms/. 70 Contact HUD: Florida, http://www.hud.gov/local/index.cfm?state=fl&topic=offices. 76 HUD in Florida, http//www.hud.gov/local/index.cfm?state=fl. 54 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 1 1. County Governments HUD is the source for the second highest amount of total expenditures, behind only DHS. As its name suggests, grants from this department, tend to be largely ' concentrated in urban areas, although HUD does offer certain grants specifically for rural areas such as the Rural Housing and Economic Development Program (CFDA Number 14.250).77 Total expenditures range from a maximum of $255,699,738 by ' Miami-Dade County, as noted in Table 3.6, to a minimum of $2,299 by Okeechobee County, while per capita expenditures range from a maximum of $107.62 by Miami- Dade County, as noted in Table 3.7, to a minimum of $0.06 by Okeechobee County. Block grants, the predominant type of award, are generally formula in nature as they pertain to HUD, and given the greater flexibility allowed they should be quite attractive to local governments from the budget forecasting perspective. Expenditures of HUD ' awards in total and per capita measures heavily favor the more populated counties of Florida, with no county ranking below the top 20 in terms of population being in the top ten for either measure of expenditures illustrated in Table 3.6 and Table 3.7. Table 3.6: Expenditures of Department of Housing and Urban Development Grants County 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami-Dade $255,699,738 1 Broward $58,841,721 2 Palm Beach $56,872,709 3 Orange $47,387,055 5 Pinellas $39,653,919 6 Hillsborough $35,645,830 4 Lee $28,382,432 8 Escambia $25,744,594 17 Volusia $25,404,615 11 Pasco $18,857,826 12. Source: Florida LCIR Table 3.7: Per Capita Expenditures of De artment of Housin and Urban Development Grants Count 2002-2006 Cumulative Ex enditures 2006 Population Rank Miami-Dade $107.62 1 Escambia $84.31 17 Lee $53.85 8 Volusia $52.79 11 Pasco $48.45 12 Orange $46.56 5 Palm Beach $45.79 3 Seminole $43.92 13 Pinellas $42.03 6 Collier $40.16 15 Source: Florida LCIR " http://www.hud.-Qov/offices/cpd/economicdevelopment/programs/rhed/. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 55 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 2. Municipal Governments HUD awards account for the largest total amount of expenditures by municipalities for any of the agencies analyzed except DHS, with approximately $750 million for the five- year time frame. Total expenditures range from $176,718,475 by Miami in Miami-Dade County as illustrated by Table 3.8, to $2,405 by Arcadia in De Soto County, while per capita expenditures range from a maximum of $465.36 by Miami in Miami-Dade County as illustrated in Table 3.9, to $0.36 by Arcadia in De Soto County. Municipalities generally demonstrate slightly lower total expenditures and moderately higher per capita expenditures than their counterparts in county government, although Miami-Dade County and Miami appear to be exceptions, exhibiting substantially greater total and per capita expenditures. Table 3.8: Expenditures of Department of Housing and Urban Development Grants Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami $176,718,475 2 Jacksonville $71,993,439 1 Tama $64,106,449 3 Fort Lauderdale $57,694,971 8 Hialeah $39,616,880 5 Orlando $32,150,707 6 Saint Petersburg $29,938,957 4 West Palm Beach $27,638,472 19 Miami Beach $21,752,227 20 Tallahassee $19,848,316 7 Source: Florida LCIR Table 3.9: Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Housing and Urban Development Grants Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expend! ures 2006 Population Rank Miami $465.36 2 Fort Lauderdale $343.93 8 Sarasota $336.71 42 West Palm Beach $284.89 19 Miami Beach $238.61 20 Tama $198.87 3 South Bay $186.79 217 Pensacola $180.26 43 Hialeah $171.31 5 Cocoa $162.01 114 Source: Florida LCIR 56 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations C. Department of Health and Human Services Award Expenditures The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has as its core mission to "enhance the health and well-being of Americans by providing for effective health and human services and by fostering strong, sustained advances in the sciences, underlying medicine, public health, and social services. ,78 This mission focuses on those individuals who are least able to provide these essential services for themselves and is accomplished through goals and objectives listed in a strategic plan. There are 11 administrative divisions within HHS. Eight of these divisions are Public Health Service Agencies: the National Institutes of Health; the Food and Drug Administration; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; the Indian Health Service; the Health Resources and Services Administration; the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and; the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. The three remaining divisions are Human Services Agencies: the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; the Administration for Children and Families, and; the Administration on Aging. The 11 divisions within HHS are responsible for nearly a quarter of all federal outlays, over 300 programs in total. It must be noted, however, that not all of these programs are in the sample of grants local governments are eligible to apply for. In fact, the two largest programs, Medicare and Medicaid, require application at the state level which helps to explain why reported expenditures sourced to this agency are not greater. HHS maintains a grants website79 which lists grant information specific to the agency such as forecasts of future opportunities and HHS grants information (GrantsNet). This webpage also contains general purpose links to funding opportunities such as www.Grants.aov and links to a federal loan website. HHS's website also provides a listing of past grant awards by HHS operating divisions, which is unique among federal agencies. HHS's website is relatively user friendly and provides easy access to federal funding information; this is most likely due to the relative prevalence of grants and other federal awards in the agency's mission. This is reflected through the agency's statement that "many HHS-funded services are provided at the local level by state or county agencies or through private sector grantees."80 78 HHS, Department FAQs, http://www.hhs.gov/fag/about/departmenVl896.html. 79 HHS, Grants and Funding, http://taggs.hhs.gov/. 80 HHS: What We Do, http://www,hhs.gov/about/whatwedo.htmi/. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 57 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 1. County Governments HHS awarded expenditures are the third largest cumulative total, behind the DHS and HUD, comprising 15 percent of unadjusted expenditures and 25 percent of expenditures adjusted for the "FEMA Effect." Total expenditures range from $414,174,534 by Miami- Dade County to $478 by Gilchrist County, while per capita expenditures range from $174.22 by Miami-Dade County to $0.01 by Putnam County. The top ten counties in terms of total and per capita expenditures are illustrated in Table 3.10 and Table 3.11. They are identical in composition for this awarding agency, reflecting not only more resources to pursue grants, but also a greater need due to the societal and occupational hazards encountered in large urban areas. Given that the vast majority of HHS grants local governments are eligible to apply for are project grants, it seems intuitive that areas with resources to pursue funding, and the need to provide services through this funding, would be the most successful in a competitive environment. Table 3.10: Expenditures of Department of Health and Human Services Grants County 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami-Dade $414,174,534 1 Hillsborough $156,789,810 4 Palm Beach $116,566,293 3 Orange $103,651,549 5 Broward $80,981,648 2 Pinellas $13,803,576 6 Volusia $12,999,395 11 Polk $10,038,181 9 Seminole $7,972,004 13 Pasco $5,477,555 12 Source: Florida LCIR Table 3.11: Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Health and Human Services Grants County 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami-Dade $174.22 1 -Hillsborough $141.68 4 -Orange $102.44 5 Palm Beach $94.20 3 Broward $47.10 2 Volusia $27.61 11 Seminole $19.62 13 Polk $18.54 9 Pinellas $14.60 6 Pasco $13.94 12 Source: Florida LCIR 58 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 2. Municipal Governments HHS awarded expenditures are generally low in both total and per capita measures, and are also relatively few for municipalities. Total expenditures range from $20,107,766 by Jacksonville/Duval County as illustrated in Table 3.12 to $930 by Quincy in Gadsden County. Per capita expenditures range from a maximum of $157.38 by Welaka in Putnam County as illustrated in Table 3.13, to a minimum of $.11 by Tallahassee in Leon County. As a consolidated city/county government, Jacksonville/Duval County reports the largest total and per capita expenditures, exhibiting nearly 20 times the total expenditures of the municipality with the second highest expenditures, Miami, and nearly three times the per capita expenditures of the next closest municipality, Deerfield Beach. Understandably, in this case Jacksonville/Duval County exhibits characteristics more representative of a county than a municipality, with totals that would comfortably locate it within the top ten counties. Table 3.12: Expenditures of Depart ent of Health and Human Services Grant Funds Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Jacksonville $26,799,953 1 Miami $1,222,795 2 Gainesville $1,111,200 14 Fort Lauderdale $354,677 8 Deerfield Beach $337,227 28 Pembroke Pines $260,295 10 Cape Coral $173,863 9 Orlando $141,192 6 Welaka $98,206 358 Avon Park $64,750 170 Source: Florida LCIR Table 3.13: Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Health and Human Services Grants Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Welaka $157.38 358 Jacksonville $25.24 1 Gainesville $9.32 14 Avon Park $7.38 170 Deerfield Beach $5.21 28 Miami $3.34 2 Fort Lauderdale $2.17 8 Pembroke Pines $1.72 10 Homestead $1.51 9 Cape Coral $1.13 57 Source: Florida LCIR Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 59 Florida Legislative Committee on intergovernmental Relations D. Department of Transportation Award Expenditures The Department of Transportation (DOT) was established by Congress in 1966 and began operation in April of 1967. Prior to that time, the Coast Guard and the Army Corps of Engineers dealt with transportation infrastructure.81 The mission of DOT, as the agency identifies it, is to "serve the United States by ensuring a fast, safe, efficient, accessible and convenient transportation system that meets our vital national interests and enhances the quality of life of the American people, today and into the future."82 Divisions within this agency are the Office of the Secretary, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the Federal Railroad Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, the Maritime Administration, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, the Research & Innovative Technology Administration, the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, and the Surface Transportation Board. Given the well established role of public transit in large urban areas, DOT has an entire division dedicated to this function in the Federal Transit Administration. When DOT was initially organized, responsibility for planning and operating the nation's mass transit systems was transferred from HUD to the Urban Mass Transit Administration, now the Federal Transit Administration where it continues to reside today.83 More recently, the Transportation Security Administration was created in early 2002 but was almost immediately transferred to DHS as part of the major government reorganization. Additionally, oversight of the Coast Guard was transferred to DHS as part of the same reorganization. DOT is similar to the Department of Justice in that it has a broad mission, and uses grants as one of many tools to achieve this mission. Grants are not featured prominently on the primary webpage; rather, they are administered by the subdivisions of DOT such as the Federal Aviation Administration, the Federal Highway Administration, and the Federal Transit Administration, each of which serves a unique purpose and offers grants accordingly. Occasionally this has lead to "an overabundance of aid for some means of transportation and inadequate support for others."$4 A majority of DOT grants, including those utilized by local governments in Florida, are awarded by the Federal Transit Administration. This division also has a relatively prominent grants website which contains links to specific programs and an "Applying for and Managing Grants" section.85 81 DOT, A brief History, hftp://dotlibrary.dot.gov/Historian/historv.htm. 82 DOT, History and Mission, http://www.dot.aov/mission.htm. 83 DOT, A brief History, http://dotlibrary.dot.gov/Historian/history.htm. 84 DOT, A brief History, http://dotl!brary.dot.gov/Historian/history.htm. 85 FTA, Grant Programs, hftp://www.fta.dot.gov/fundinq/,qrants financing 263.html. 60 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 1. County Governments Expenditures of DOT awards exhibit more balance based on geography than other agency awards, although it is clear that at least in the case of total expenditures population also plays a major role. Total expenditures range from a maximum of $118,015,370 by Broward County to a minimum of.$75,498 by DeSoto County, while per capita expenditures range from a maximum of $297.55 by Monroe County as illustrated in Table 3.15, to a minimum of $0.52 by Leon County. Table 3.14 shows that the three major urban counties in South Florida, Miami-Dade County, Broward County, and Palm Beach County report some of the greatest total expenditures. Table 3.14: Expenditures of Department of Transportation Grants County 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Broward $118,015,370 2 Palm Beach $95,902,607 3 Miami-Dade $86,226,773 1 Lee $80,535,095 8 Volusia $52,557,002 11 Okaloosa $28,781,352 24 Pinellas $25,752,322 7 Polk $24,821,834 9 Monroe $24,165,170 37 Brevard $19,544,495 10 Source: Florida LCIR Table 3.15: Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Transportation Grants County 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Monroe $297.55 37 Okaloosa $154.90 24 Lee $154.64 8 Volusia $108.71 11 Palm Beach $78.00 3 Broward $68.92 2 Martin $59.13 30 Polk $46.95 9 Brevard $46.72 10 We $42.85 59 Source: Florida LCIR 2. Municipal Governments Expenditures of DOT awards range from $41,345,188 by Tallahassee in Leon County to $33,557 by Belle Glade in Palm Beach County. Per capita expenditures range from $428.97 by Vero Beach in Indian River County as illustrated in Table 3.17, to $0.84 by Jacksonville/Duval County. These municipalities introduce an interesting topic, the role of Special Districts, namely Transit Authorities. Each of the municipalities in the top ten total expenditures, as illustrated in Table 3.16, is in an area not represented by a functioning Transit or Transportation Authority or only reported expenditures from the Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 61 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Airport Improvement Program.86 This phenomenon brings to light the role of special districts which are ePible to receive awards from the federal government, and are numerous in Florida.8 Furthermore, Leon County reports less than $200,000 in DOT award expenditures while Tallahassee reports more than $41 million and Alachua County reports no expenditures while Gainesville reports over $14 million. In this case, the largest municipality in the county (and the surrounding counties) receives grants to operate the local transit system, which explains the disparity between awards to city and county governments.88 Table 3.16: Expenditures of Eligible Department of Transportation Grants Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Tallahassee $41,345,188 7 Pensacola $17,498,417 43 Gainesville $14,279,104 14 Melbourne $11,011,046 29 Fort Lauderdale $9,683,957 8 Ocala $8,650,578 47 Vero Beach $7,704,580 107 Lakeland $5,893,502 22 Kissimmee $4,802,824 39 Fernandina Beach $3,500,642 147 Source: Florida LCIR Table 3.17: Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Transportation Grants municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Vero Beach $428.97 107 Pensacola $315.95 43 Fernandina Beach $303.56 147 Tallahassee $245.92 7 Palatka $218.88 151 Avon Park $188.61 170 Port Riche $182.63 243 Ocala $174.14 47 Sebastian $158.95 101 Melbourne $148.19 29 Source: Florida LCIR 86 While Pensacola is covered by the Northwest Florida Transportation Corridor Authority, this entity was established in 2005 and as such is not relevant to this analysis. Fort Lauderdale is covered by the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority and Kissimmee is covered by the Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority; however, each of these municipalities only reported expenditures from the Airport Improvement Program (CFDA Number 20.106). 87 For a full discussion of special districts see the Florida Special District Information Page, hftp://www.floridaspecialdistricts.org/. StarMetro in Tallahassee, htt://www.tal ov.com/starmetro/index.cfm, and Gainesville Regional Transit System http://www.go-rts.com/ are associated with their municipal governments. 62 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations E. Department of Justice Award Expenditures The current Department of Justice (DOJ) has as its genesis the agency of the same name that was created in 1870 by the Act to Establish the Department of Justice in an attempt to improve efficiency of government operation. Prior to that time, hiring private attorneys to assist the Attorney General was common practice, and was expanded after the Civil War, becoming quite costly. DOJ was given control over criminal and civil cases in which the United States had an interest as well as federal law enforcement. DOJ has since evolved through the addition of Deputy Attorneys General and the formation of divisions.89 While the Attorney General is the head of DOJ, there are numerous functions and agencies under its umbrella. The FBI, the DEA, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, and U.S. Marshalls all fall under the jurisdiction of DOJ, as do specialized branches of legal expertise such as the Antitrust Division, the Civil Division, the Civil Rights Division, the Criminal Division, and the Tax Division.90 While not all agencies that are part of DOJ offer grants, many do, and DOJ maintains a website with links to specific grant programs and links to agency sites which contain information specific to that agency.91 DOJ "offers funding opportunities to conduct research, to support law enforcement activities in state and local jurisdictions, to provide training and technical assistance, and to implement programs that improve the criminal justice system."92 Many DOJ grants are intended to supplement law enforcement capabilities such as the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Program and Justice Assistance Grants. A recent change in the grants realm that is fully discussed in Chapter Four is the change from Local Law Enforcement Block Grants and Byrne Formula Grants to Justice Assistance Grants (officially called The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program). The changes are an attempt to offer greater flexibility to recipients by giving them greater control over the funds.93 as DOJ, Mission Statement and Statutory Authority, http://www.usdowgov/02organizations/. 90 The entire list of agencies under DOJ is too lengthy to be included here, but is available via httg://www.usdoj_„gov/02organizations/02 1.html. DOJ Grants, Links to Agency Grant Sites, http://www.usdon.gov/10grants/. 92 DOJ Grants, http://www.usdoa.gov/10grants/. 93 Justice Assistance Grant Program, How JAG Differs from Byrne and LLEBG; http://www.oap.usdom.gov/BJA/grant/iag.htmi. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 63 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 1. County Governments DOJ awarded expenditures range considerably, from $21,797,429 by Miami-Dade County to $879 by Madison County. The top ten counties in terms of expenditures are generally the most populous counties, although Monroe and Collier Counties are exceptions as illustrated by Table 3.18. Moderately populated to less populated counties are prominent in Table 3.19 illustrating the top ten per capita expenditures, with Monroe County exhibiting more than triple the per capita expenditures of any other county. Per capita expenditures range from $223.72 in Monroe County to $0.04 in Madison County.94 Table 3.18: ExnpnrliturP_q of nPnarimPn4 of _hictir_a C;rnnfa Coun 2002-2006 Cumulative Ex enditures 2006 Population Rank Miami-Dade $21,797,429 1 Oran 2e $20,991,643 5 Monroe $18,023,973 37 Pinellas $15,212,013 6 Hillsborough $10,891,317 4 Collier $9,620,725 15 Broward $9,189,505 2 Palm Beach $8,902,391 3 Polk $7,123,673 9 Brevard $4,850,964 10 Source: Florida LCIR Table 3.19: Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Justice Grants Count 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Monroe $223.72 37 Glades $80.08 65 Collier $32.13 15 Clay $25.38 25 Holmes $25.18 56 Jefferson $24.29 62 Santa Rosa $23.67 31 Orange $20.86 5 Putnam $20.73 38 Saint Johns $20.35 27 Source: Florida LCIR 94 The only year during our sample time frame in which Madison County filed a single audit was 2006. 64 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 2. Municipal Governments DOJ awarded expenditures range from $21,257,067 by Miami in Miami-Dade County to $361 for Archer in Alachua County. Per capita expenditures range from $94.70 for Riviera Beach in Palm Beach County to $0.19 for Weston in Broward County and Niceville in Okaloosa County. For this agency, the trend of more populated localities reporting higher total expenditures and less populated localities reporting higher per capita expenditures once again appears in Table 3.20 and Table 3.21, but is relatively weak and contains several notable exceptions. Ta 1 ble 3.20: Ex enditures of De artment of Justice Grai Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami $21,257,067 2 Jacksonville $20,942,685 1 Tama $16,215,593 3 Orlando $10,533,747 6 Saint Petersburg $5,431,948 4 Tallahassee $3,956,791 7 Gainesville $3,867,053 14 West Palm Beach $3,818,020 19 Fort Lauderdale $3,642,783 8 Clearwater $3,117,451 15 Source: Florida LCIR its Table 3.21: Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Justice Grants Munici ali 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Riviera Beach $94.70 69 Miami $56.71 2 Homestead $53.84 62 Fort Myers $53.49 34 Orlando $52.11 6 Tama $50.80 3 Baldwin $49.58 303 North Miami Beach $42.38 62 Ocala $40.54 47 West Palm Beach $40.54 17 Source: Florida LGIK Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 65 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations This page was intentionally left blank. 66 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations CHAPTER FOUR Grants by Type 1 This chapter profiles both project and formula grants and will identify the local governments with the greatest reported expenditures, and grant programs for which local governments reported the greatest total expenditures. Furthermore, each program identified as being in the top ten for reported expenditures will be profiled. The format is as follows: first, project grants are analyzed, with the top ten counties and municipalities reported; next, the top ten programs as identified by CFDA Number are listed; finally, each program in the top ten list is profiled. This format is then replicated for municipalities and the entire process is repeated for formula grants. Project and formula grants exhibit some similarities; however, these are mainly procedural, and are negligible compared to the differences. First and foremost is the awards process, with formula grant recipients generally receiving funds automatically based on meeting eligibility criteria and prospective project grant recipients spending time and money in the hopes of receiving funding. Thus, formula grants can be viewed as desirable from a budget forecasting perspective; however, because project grants have greater subjectivity they can also reward innovative and/or superior proposals with greater funding, and have the potential to reward well qualified applicants. As noted previously, formula grants generally account for a much larger share of federal awards than project grants; however, that will not be the case for this analysis since the grants are restricted to those for which local governments are eligible to apply. This distinction excludes many of the larger, state administered pass-through grants, such as the Coastal Zone Management Award (CFDA Number 11.419), for which local governments are not eligible to apply. As a result of this distinction, as well as the large amounts spent on hurricane mitigation and recovery project grants, formula grants are approximately half of the total for project grants. 95 A. Project Grants In the sample used, project grants exhibit much higher levels of expenditures than formula grants, both in total and per capita terms for the reasons previously discussed. Additionally, the well established trend of greater total expenditures for areas with larger populations and greater per capita expenditures for areas with smaller populations is clear in this case, perhaps more so in the absence of formula or noncompetitive awards which can be greater than expected if an area contains a population with many members targeted by a specific program. Project grants exhibit a significant differentiation between counties and municipalities, with the greatest reported expenditures by a county government being nearly ten times the greatest expenditures by a municipality. This is partially due to the role of the 95 Some overlap of programs will occur due to the fact that certain programs contain aspects of both project and formula grants; for the same reason the total of project grants and formula grants will not equal the annual total for any year or the cumulative total across all years. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 67 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations "FEMA Effect" which, as has already been established, is larger for counties than for municipalities. Contributing to this effect is also the fact that counties have more resources to devote to grant-seeking. An interesting observation about project grants is that they tend to exhibit more balance across agencies, or more correctly, less unbalance than formula grants. There are three agencies with more than one project grant in the list of top ten programs; DHS, HHS, and HUD each have two programs in the top ten list while DOT, DOJ, EPA, and USDA each have one. This is in sharp contrast to formula grants where two agencies comprise 80 percent of the top ten grants and reflects a structural difference between project and formula grants. The most improvement can be made in the draw-down of project grants, primarily due to the competitive nature of the application process. As previously discussed, the quality of the application and innovation of the project itself can differentiate an application whereby a formula grant is dependent on quantifiable factors and will be more standard in nature. Unfortunately, project grants generally display a more costly and time consuming application process which represents a hurdle that must be overcome in order to maximize the draw-down of federal grants. 1. County Governments At the county level, total expenditures range from a maximum of $1,072,494,617 by Miami-Dade County as illustrated in Table 4.1, to a minimum of $114,660 by Columbia County. Since these numbers are not adjusted to exclude hurricane mitigation and recovery funds, expenditures for counties such as Escambia, Santa Rosa, and Okaloosa which were greatly impacted by hurricanes may be overstated; however, the most populous counties still generally report the greatest expenditures. In per capita terms the greatest reported expenditures are again present in the least populous counties, with Miami-Dade being the notable exception. Per capita expenditures range from a maximum of $1,816.81 by Calhoun County as illustrated in Table 4.2, to a minimum of $1.95 by Columbia County. While it does appear anecdotally that levels of per capita expenditures are highly correlated to counties that experienced the largest effect of the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons, it is important to include hurricane mitigation and recovery grant expenditures in this analysis because of the large role of the federal government in disaster assistance. 68 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Table 4.1: Expenditures of Eligible Federal Grant Funds County 2002-2006 Cumulative Ex enditures 2006 Population Rank Miami-Dade $1,072,494,617 1 Palm Beach $264,024,346 3 Escambia $234,793,373 17 Hillsborough $203,045,479 4 Broward $181,063,608 2 Oran a $161,042,753 5 Lee $109,072,321 8 Volusia $70,502,102 11 Santa Rosa $69,871,176 31 Charlotte $58,043,139 28 Source: Florida LCIR Table 4.2: Per Capita Expenditures of Eligible Federal Grant Funds County 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Calhoun $1,816.81 63 DeSoto $792.50 48 Escambia $770.78 17 Hardee $565.70 51 Taylor $520.44 54 Santa Rosa $511.91 31 Monroe $507.58 37 Miami-Dade $450.15 1 Holmes $401.21 56 Liberty $393.73 66 Source: Florida LCIR 2. Municipal Governments Reported expenditures of project grant funds are substantially lower for municipalities than counties. Total expenditures range from a maximum of $103,153,936 by Miami in Miami-Dade County as illustrated in Table 4.3, to a minimum of $4,383 by Ponce Inlet in Volusia County. Although the greatest reported expenditures generally come from the most populous municipalities, it is more likely that for this type of grant large-scale projects in smaller to medium sized municipalities are leading to a slightly more balanced population distribution for the counties reporting the greatest total expenditures, while the greatest per capita expenditures are reported by smaller municipalities exclusively. Per capita expenditures range from a maximum of $11,776.87 by Jupiter Island in Martin County as illustrated in Table 4.4, to a minimum of $0.77 by Zephyrhills in Pasco County. It is expected that these relatively high per capita expenditures are largely due to the small size of the municipalities reporting, Federal Grants to Florida's Local Govemments 69 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations although it is also necessary to be cognizant of the fact that certain award programs overstate the expenditures for many rural communities.96 Table 4.3: Expenditures of Eligible Federal Grant Funds Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami $103,153,936 2 Fort Lauderdale $98,862,965 $ Pensacola $78,961,167 45 Jacksonville $75,966,132 1 West Palm Beach $48,811,061 19 Tama $47,296,040 3 Orlando $47,283,509 6 Tallahassee $42,194,507 7 Pembroke Pines $34,419,770 10 Holl ood $29,067,072 12 Source: Florida LCIR Table 4.4: Per Capita Expenditures of Eligible Federal Grant Funds Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Jupiter Island $11,776.87 356 Coleman $5,121.51 352 Freeport $4,139.94 317 Ever lades $4,091.75 362 White Springs $2,663.57 356 Bushnell $2,336.71 273 Apalachicola $1,901.71 260 West Miami $1,865.27 204 Lawte $1,811.01 348 Wauchula $1,584.88 224 Source: Florida LCIR B. Specific Project Grant Programs Specific programs are highlighted below to illustrate the difficulties and successes which can be encountered in the grant-seeking process. For a full list of grant expenditures reported by local governments over the time frame of this report, see the LCIR website.g' There are several justifications for analysis of a specific CFDA Number, but they generally fall into the broad categories of size and relative importance of the award program to local governments, as illustrated in Table 4.5, or upcoming/recent changes to a widely utilized program. This analysis will be based upon the top ten project and 96 USDA programs 10.760 and 10.770, Rural Water and Waste Disposal Program require that outstanding bonds be counted as an expenditure each year. This program affects all municipalities in the top ten per capita except Freeport, White Springs, and Jupiter Island. 97 www.floridalcir.gov. (website address will be updated when data is posted) 70 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on intergovernmental Relations formula grants with the justification that these programs account for a substantial share of total expenditures, with the top ten project grants accounting for approximately' 45 percent of all expenditures in the sample. The cumulative total of reported expenditures for all project grants for fiscal years ending 2002 to 2006 are approximately $5 billion, comprising a substantially larger share of expenditures than formula grants due to the construction of the report's sample. Several specific challenges appear to exist in local government grant-seeking, primarily associated with application procedures and requirements. The primary challenges are additional eligibility requirements limiting the program to specific local governments, requirements that favor localities currently receiving funds from the respective program, and application requirements necessitating that a specific process be followed or specific actions be taken. The final obstacle is the availability of matching funds required by the granting agency, which is evident through the observed trend that many of the programs reporting the greatest expenditures offer generous federal matches, generally on the order of 75 percent or greater. Tahla d r%- Fxnaneiihireaw of Flinihie Federal Grant Funds 1 1 CFDA Total Number Expenditure Program Name Agency Disaster Grants - Public Assistance Department of 97.036 $2,642,373,962 Presidential) Declared Disasters Homeland Security Department of Health 93.600 $514,831,005 Head Start and Human Services Department of 20.106 $374,164,606 Airport Improvement Program Transportation Department of Health 93.914 $344,547,209 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants and Human Services Department of Housing Opportunities for Persons with Housing and Urban 14.241 $153,5$1,856 AIDS HOPWA Development Public Safety Partnership and Community 16.710 $137,378,321 Policing Grants De artment of Justice Department of Housing and Urban 14.235 $87,212,267 Supportive Housing Program Development Department of 97.039 $67,624,780 Hazard Mitigation Grant Homeland Securit Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Department of 10.760 $55,442,135 Rural Communities A riculture Environmental 66.202 $55,286,769 Congressionally Mandated Projects Protection Agency Jource: rtunua LUIri 1. Department of Homeland Security As previously discussed, DHS funds comprised the majority of reported expenditures for the time frame covered in this report, largely due to two significant mitigation and recovery grants. The primary mitigation grant will be discussed because it "provides grants to States and local governments to implement long-term hazard mitigation Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 71 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations measures after a major disaster declaration."98 The title of this grant is the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (CFDA Number 97.039) and this program was utilized by 53 counties and 41 municipalities. The primary recovery grant will be addressed because in the unfortunate event a state of disaster is declared by the President, local governments should be aware of the program and its potential to offset certain recovery costs. The name of this program is Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) (CFDA Number 97.036) and this program was utilized by 62 counties and 199 municipalities. The grant is authorized by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.99 These grants are available only in the event of a Presidentially Declared Disaster and can be used for "debris removal, emergency protective measures and the repair, restoration, reconstruction or replacement of public facilities or infrastructure damaged or destroyed."100 As illustrated by Table 4.5, this grant program has, by far, the greatest reported expenditures, more than doubling the next highest program's total. 2. Department of Housing and Urban Development The HUD programs in the list of programs reporting expenditures in the top ten are the Supportive Housing Program (CFDA Number 14.235) and Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (CFDA Number 14.241). Both of these programs attempt to provide housing opportunities for two distinct sets of typically underserved residents. The Supportive Housing Program was utilized by 6 counties and 2 municipalities. According to the CFDA, "the Supportive Housing Program is designed to promote the development of supportive housing and supportive services to assist homeless persons in the transition from homelessness and to enable them to live as independently as possible."'()' While the federal match requirements are not as generous for acquisition, rehabilitation, and new construction as are some of the other highlighted programs there are a wide variety of uses allowed which adds to the attractiveness of the program. Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (CFDA Number 14.241) is somewhat unique in the sense that it contains aspects of both project and formula grants within the same program. This program was utilized by 4 counties and 8 municipalities. Aspects of the noncompetitive element of this program are discussed later in this chapter. The competitive element focuses on projects of national significance in areas that do not qualify for the formula allocation and encourages innovative service delivery programs. Further information regarding the competitive aspect of this program is available at hft :/? /www.hud c ov/offices/cpd/aidshousingprograms/competitive/. 98 htt ://www.fema. ov/ overnment/ rant/hm /. 99 Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§5121-5206 (Pub. L. 93- 288, as amended) and Pub. L. 100-707. 100 http://l2.46.245.173/pis/portal30/CATALOG.FIND_ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 97.036. 101 htt ://12.46.245.173/ Is/ ortal30/CATALOG,FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 14.235. 72 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 1 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 1 1 3. Department of Health and Human Services Two HHS grants are the next to be analyzed, namely the Head Start Program (CFDA Number 93.600) and HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants (CFDA Number 93.914). Each of these programs illustrates a unique challenge in application, with the Head Start Program limiting when applications can be made and defining the process which must be followed, and the HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Program restricting the list of local governments that are eligible applicants. The Head Start Program is aimed at "promoting school readiness by enhancing social and cognitive development of low income children" and any local government is eligible to apply. This program was utilized by five counties and one municipality. There are criteria established for the method of application which are restrictive, namely that the "application will be considered only when submitted in response to a specific announcement, published via the Internet at the following website address http://www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/grants hsb.html, which solicits proposals to establish new Head Start Programs." Thus, while there is no restriction on which local governments can apply, there are restrictions on the process which can prove problematic for local governments seeking to avail themselves of this program. Funds awarded through the HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants "are to be used to provide direct financial assistance for the purpose of delivering or enhancing HIV- related outpatient and ambulatory health and support services, including case management, substance abuse treatment and mental health treatment, and comprehensive treatment services."102 Another difficulty encountered in grant-seeking, namely that of limited eligibility based upon established criteria, presents itself here. This program was utilized by five counties and one municipality,103 in part due to application requirements. Applicants for this program are restricted to all previously eligible metropolitan areas (EMAs) and metropolitan areas with a population greater than 500,000 for which the CFDA has identified a cumulative total of more than 2,000 cases of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome for the past five years. This results in a very limited list of applicants in Florida, with previous EMAs limited to Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Tampa, St. Petersburg, Jacksonville, West Palm Beach, and Orange County.' 04 4. Department of Transportation The primary DOT grant discussed in this analysis of project grants is the Airport Improvement Program (CFDA Number 20.106). The AIP is attractive from the sense of matching requirements, with the federal share generally covering 75 percent of costs for large and medium hub airports and 95 percent of the costs for small primary, reliever, ' 102 htto://12.46.245.173/pls/portal3O/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 93.914. 103 Jacksonville/Duval County is the only "municipality" that reports expenditures from this program. ' 104 htp://,12.46.245.173/12ls/12ortal3O/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 93.914. 1 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 73 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations and general aviation airports according to the Federal Aviation Administration. 105 Given that one of the most common hurdles identified through the LCIR Survey of Local Governments was a lack of matching funds, this program should be very attractive and the high levels of participation are encouraging, suggesting that local governments are already attempting to maximize their federal draw-down while simultaneously minimizing the financial obligations which they are required to meet. The popularity of this program is reflected in the fact that it was utilized by 21 counties and 27 municipalities. 5. Department of Justice The single DOJ program in the top ten reported expenditures, the Community Oriented Policing Services or "COPS" program (CFDA Number 16.710), was utilized by 47 counties and 96 municipalities. The program's stated goal is "to increase police presence and improve cooperative efforts between law enforcement agencies and members of the community; to expand community policing efforts through the use of technology and other innovative strategies; to increase security and reduce violence in our nation's schools; to address crime and disorder problems; and to otherwise enhance public safety."106 This is another example of a program that has and should continue to appeal to local governments based upon the matching requirements, which are generally a 75 percent federal share, although the COPS in Schools Program (included in CFDA Number 16.710) actually requires no local match. This program requires additional pre-application coordination with the State Clearinghouse as it is eligible for coverage under Executive Order 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." These additional considerations should not, and in fact do not, appear to deter local governments from participation in the program as the intended goal of the state review mandated by Executive Order 12372 is to streamline the grant process. However, funds for this program have been cut substantially, decreasing nationally from approximately $500 million in FY 2007 to $4 million in FY 2008, as priorities have shifted from reducing the crime rate to improving homeland security. 6. Environmental Protection Agency The EPA's single program with reported expenditures in the top ten list, entitled Studies, Surveys, Investigations and Special Purpose Grants (CFDA Number.66.606) illustrates an interesting phenomenon, not because of the nature of the grant but because it has undergone a change in the program name and CFDA Number. In 2006, the program was incorporated into Congressionally Mandated Projects (CFDA Number 66.202). The totals referenced in Table 4.5 contain expenditures attributed to both CFDA Numbers, and this program was utilized by 16 counties and 16 municipalities. According to the CFDA "these assistance agreements involve Congressionally directed projects/programs for specific purposes in EPA's annual Appropriations Act or annual 105 FAA Overview; http://www.faa.gov/airports airtraffic/airports/aip/overview/. "' htt ://l2.46.245.173/ Is/ ortal30/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 16.710. 74 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Appropriations Conference Report."' 07 An interesting aspect of this program is the lack of a renewal process. In this case "[a] standard grant application should be prepared and submitted as a new application which will be reviewed in the same manner as the original application. Approval of subsequent funding increments is dependent on satisfactory project progress and availability of funds." This aspect of the program again reflects the need to gain institutional knowledge of a specific program or programs in order to maintain funding at levels required to complete a project. 7. Department of Agriculture The single USDA program with expenditures in the top ten is Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities (CFDA Number 10.760) which was utilized by twp counties and 28 municipalities. Expenditures for this program may potentially be ' overstated due to the previously referenced inclusion of outstanding bonds as expenditures. Despite this caveat, the magnitude of this program should be encouraging to rural communities as it is one of several programs operated by USDA Rural Development. 108 USDA offers housing, business, and utilities programs through this office with announcements of specific funding opportunities available online at hftp://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rd/nofas/index.html. Local governments are encouraged to monitor this website for supplemental information regarding funding opportunities associated with the USDA Rural Development Program. C. Formula Grants Formula grants generally offer a much more stable flow of funding than project grants, ' and funding levels generally maintain a relatively consistent relationship to population, as would be expected given that population is generally a factor in the distribution formula. Naturally, other factors are relevant, such as population relative to surrounding ' areas and urban or rural population, depending on the specific purpose of the award program. Other factors, such as poverty level, are also relevant depending on the nature of the grant. 1 i 1 1 i It is noteworthy that two agencies are the source for eight of the top ten award programs. These agencies (HUD and DOT) generally help to aid in the provision of much needed infrastructure in urban areas. HUD funds tend to be based more on some need factor, but three out of four DOT grants are specifically for urbanized areas, with the remaining program targeting non-urbanized areas. Thus, formula grants appear to be exhibiting a tendency to be more concentrated in large cities and more urbanized counties, leading to a re-examination of the trend established through analysis of combined totals and project grants. Formula grant programs are generally differentiated by some measurable characteristic, such as the urban or rural nature of a locality, or by some population threshold. The 107 httl?:Hl2.46.245.173/121s/12ortai3O/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 66.202. 108 hftp://www.rurdev.usda.go . Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 75 Florida Legislative Committee on intergovernmental Relations established trend of greatest total expenditures by larger local governments and greatest per capita expenditures by smaller local governments does not hold well in this instance. In fact, the trend is not discernable when either counties or municipalities are compared; it is only when counties are compared to municipalities that this trend is apparent. In general, counties have larger populations than municipalities, and exhibit greater total expenditures while municipalities exhibit greater per capita expenditures. Due to the fact that these grants are distributed by formula there seems to be limited capacity for local governments to improve draw-down of formula grant funds. Local governments are thus encouraged to improve draw-downs on project grants, particularly local governments which might be disadvantaged in the receipt of formula grants.109 1. County Governments At the county level, expenditures of grants awarded by formula, or non-competitive grants, range from a maximum of $283,514,126 by Miami-Dade County to a minimum of $44,801 by Washington County. Per capita expenditures range from $229.11 by Monroe County to $0.04 by Madison County. Once again, total expenditures are greater for more populated areas. But in this case, per capita expenditures, are also generally higher for more populated counties with the exceptions of Liberty County and Monroe County, as shown in Table 4.7. Additionally, the three large, urban, south Florida counties spent the most in total and are all in the top ten per capita expenditures. This is not true of two of the other large urban counties in central Florida, Orange and Hillsborough, which both are in the top ten of total expenditures shown in Table 4.6 but drop out of the top ten when per capita expenditures are examined. In the case of counties the trend of higher total expenditures, being associated with greater population, and higher per capita expenditures, being associated with smaller population, does not hold; and it appears that larger, urban counties report greater total expenditures and generally report greater per capita expenditures. Table 4.6_ Exnenditures of Elioible Federal Grant Fundc Count 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami-Dade $283,514,126 1 Broward $142,450,380 2 Palm Beach $116,260,651 3 Orange $58,574,883 5 Pinellas $57,367,715 6 Volusia $57,256,146 11 Polk $53,279,364 9 Hillsborough $44,782,595 4 Escambia $42,200,376 17 Brevard $41,942,105 10 Source: Florida LCIR 109 It is noteworthy that formula grants to smaller local governments might be slightly understated because smaller local governments that receive relatively few grants might not meet the threshold to file a Single Audit in a given year, partially due to the construction of funding formulas which generally include population as a factor. 76 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 1 Table 4.7: Per Capita Expenditures of Eligible Federal Grant Funds Count 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Monroe $229.11 1 Escambia $138.29 17 Miami-Dade $120.48 37 Volusia $118.92 11 Polk $100.81 9 Palm Beach $93.84 3 Pasco $85.25 12 Broward $83.10 2 Brevard $80.50 10 Liberty $78.18 67 Source: Florida LCIR 1 2. Municipal Governments At the municipal level, formula grants follow a very similar pattern to counties, although total expenditures in Table 4.8 are lower and per capita expenditures in Table 4.9 are higher. Total expenditures range from $154,403,527 by Miami in Miami-Dade County to $361 by Archer in Alachua County, while per capita expenditures range from $575.00 by Miami Beach in Miami-Dade County to $0.19 by Weston in Broward County. A trend to notice in this case is the role of larger cities in a given region, leading the way in total expenditures and the role of moderately sized municipalities in larger urban areas as it pertains to per capita expenditures. Thus, it can be argued that both primary cities of a metropolitan area and smaller cities within the metropolitan area have an incentive to pursue federal formula grants. Incidentally, many programs designed to benefit smaller areas are passed through state agencies, such as HUD's Community Development Block Grants, where funds from the same program are passed through the state for ' smaller local governments, but sent directly to counties with a population of more than 200,000 and cities with a population of more than 50,000.110 Source: Florida LCIR ' 110 See HUD website, Florida Community Development Block Grant Funds for a full discussion, http://www. hud.gov/local/shared/working/groups/frmwrkcoinfl/fund/cd bgfl.cfm?state=az. Table 4.8: Ex enditures of Eligible Federal Grant Funds Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Rank Miami $154,403,527 2 Jacksonville $83,642,598 1 Tama $71,086,512 3 Fort Lauderdale $59,817,875 8 Miami Beach $52,514,147 20 Orlando $36,099,490 6 Hialeah $35,802,680 5 Tallahassee $32,504,801 7 Saint Petersburg $28,754,445 4 Gainesville $28,247,560 14 I Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 77 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Table 4.9: Per Capita Expenditures of Eliaible Federal Grant Funds Municipality 2002-2006 Cumulative Expenditures 2006 Population Ranh Miami Beach $575.00 20 Miami $407.12 2 Fort Lauderdale $356.67 8 Sarasota $347.94 42 Gainesville $246.26 14 West Palm Beach $235.88 19 Tama $220.87 3 Homestead $216.30 62 North Miami $201.60 39 Tallahassee $193.52 7 Source: Florida LCIR D. Specific Formula Grant Programs As previously discussed, formula grants hold a specific advantage over project grants from a budget perspective in that they are easier to forecast. There is a much greater degree of consistency as a general rule pertaining to formula grants. In the compiled list of the top ten expenditures by program, the greatest total expenditures come primarily from two agencies: the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Transportation. The only other awarding agencies captured in the top ten list presented in Table 4.10 are the Department of Justice and the Department of Education. Total reported expenditures of all formula grants are approximately $2 billion, but it is important to note this total only includes grants for which local governments are eligible applicants. Issues associated with formula grants center primarily around program changes and the role of intermediaries, primarily the state but in some cases other governmental entities such as Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and changes to the administration of a program such as a name or CFDA Number change. An additional issue that local governments should be aware of is the potential for partnering with other governments or governmental entities (if allowable) to meet program criteria or established population thresholds. 78 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Table 4.10: Expenditures of Eligible Federal Grant Funds 1 1 1 i 1 1 CFDA Total Number Expenditure Program Name Agency Community Development Block Department of Housing 14.218 $849,194,216 Grants/Entitlement Grants and Urban Development Department of 20.507 $348,536,194 Federal Transit Formula Grants Transportation Department of Housing 14.239 $281,648,772 HOME Investments Partnership Program and Urban Development Housing Opportunities for Persons with Department of Housing 14.241 $283,517,439 AIDS HOPWA and Urban Development Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (now 16.592 $133,986,017 Justice Assistance Grant Department of Justice Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Department of Health 93.558 $63,455,628 TANF and Human Services Department of Housing 14.231 $29,946,220 Emergency Shelter Grants Program and Urban Development Federal Transit Capital Improvement Department of 20.500 $24,694,714 Grants Transportation Formula Grants for Other than Urbanized Department of 20.509 $24,251,208 Areas Transportation Federal Transit Metropolitan Planning Department of 20.505 $22,385,541 Grants Transportation Source: Florida LCIR 1. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD has the greatest reported expenditures of formula grant funds by local governments of any awarding agency, with the total from programs listed in the top ten at $1,444,306,647, or approximately 20 percent of all reported expenditures. The four programs are: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants (CFDA Number 14.218); the HOME Investments Partnership Program (CFDA Number 14.239); Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (CFDA Number 14.241); and, the Emergency Shelter Grants Program (CFDA Number 14.231), all of which are discussed in greater detail below. Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants not only offer a relative degree of stability in budget forecasting, they also allow for flexibility in meeting the objectives set forth by the program of "developing viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment, and by expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income." 111 Additionally, HUD maintains a comprehensive website112 pertaining to this specific program which provides a wealth of information ranging from objectives and requirements of the program to additional resources and funding allocations, all of which should be helpful to the grant seeker. This program was utilized by 51 counties and 103 municipalities. 1' htt_g://l2.46.245.17311)ls/portal3O/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 14.218. 112 htt ://www.hud. ov/offices/c d/communit develo meot/ ro rams/entitlement/. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 79 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations According to the CFDA, the HOME Investments Partnership Program has four listed objectives, all aimed at increasing the supply of affordable housing, specifically for low income individuals.' 13 HUD also maintains an extremely comprehensive website for this program which provides insight into certain aspects relevant to local government participation, such as the prevalence of partnering with local non-profit groups. Furthermore, this website explains "communities that do not qualify for an individual allocation under the formula can join with one or more neighboring localities in a legally binding consortium whose members' combined allocation would meet the threshold for direct funding."' 14 This presents a unique opportunity for local governments to benefit from a program they would be otherwise unable to apply for and is another example of the flexibility that makes HUD programs so widely used. This program was utilized by 26 counties and 35 municipalities. According to HUD, the Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) program is "the only Federal program dedicated to address the housing needs of persons living with HIV/AIDS and their families."115 The application and award process for this program appear to be relatively simple. The application process for the noncompetitive aspect of this program focuses on eligible metropolitan statistical areas (EMSAs) with the largest city within the EMSA serving as the applicant/grantee. This program was utilized by four counties and eight municipalities. Furthermore, this program allows local governments which have participated in the past to continue applying for grants even if they no longer meet the requirements for new applicants. Further information regarding the formula element of this program can be accessed online at htt ://www.hud. ov/offices/c d/aidshousin / ro rams/formula/. The final HUD program is the Emergency Shelter Grants Program which "Provides homeless persons with basic shelter and essential supportive services." 1 s This program, which was utilized by 13 counties and nine municipalities, illustrates another unique feature in the application process. Large cities and urban counties receive funds from HUD by formula allocation, and then become grantees themselves, making funds available to local agencies or non-profit entities that provide the services directly to recipients but do not interact directly with HUD. One aspect of this program which local governments might find less attractive is the 50-50 local matching requirement, although "in-kind" matches are acceptable. 117 Unfortunately, the two HUD programs with the greatest total expenditures are already beginning to see a decline in funding. The Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investments Partnership Programs funding declined by $117 million and $62 htt://12.46.245.1731 is/ ortal30/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, 1 Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 14.239. 114 hft ://www.hud. ov/offices/c d/affordablehousin / ro rams/home/. 115 httR://www.hud.clov/offices/cpd/aidshousing/. ' "B http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/homeless/programs/esq/. 117 HUD defines "in kind" as "contributions such as the value of a donated building,. supplies and equipment, new staff services, and volunteer time" which are not monetary contributions but represent , goods and/or services provided as a substitute for their monetary value. 80 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments ' 1 1 1 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations million, respectively, below 2007 levels' 18 with further cuts expected to the Community Development Block Grants Program in FY 2009.119 2. Department of Transportation The Department of Transportation lists the next greatest reported expenditures of awards by local governments, total expenditures are $798,403,851 or approximately 12 percent of all reported expenditures. The four programs included are: Federal Transit Formula Grants: Urbanized Area Formula Program (CFDA Number 20.507); Federal Transit Capital Investment Grants: Fixed Guideway Modernization Bus and Bus Facilities New Starts (CFDA Number 20.500); Formula Grants for Other than Urbanized Areas Program (CFDA Number 20.509); and, Federal Transit Metropolitan Planning Grants (CFDA Number 20.505). The Federal Transit Formula Grants: Urbanized Area Formula Program (CFDA Number 20.507) was utilized by 20 counties and four municipalities and is specifically targeted to urban areas, defined as municipalities with a population greater than 50,000. This program differentiates between urbanized areas with a population between 50,000 and 199,999 and areas with a population greater than 200,000. For areas between 50,000 and 199,999, population and population density are the allocation factors, while for areas with population greater than 200,000, bus revenue vehicle miles, bus passenger miles, fixed guideway revenue vehicle miles, and fixed guideway route miles are also included according to the program website.120 According to the Federal Transit Administration, Metropolitan Planning Organizations that serve as the forum for cooperative decision making and represent more than 75 percent of the affected population (including the largest incorporated city in the region) must work with the "designated recipient" (selected by the State's chief executive officer) to develop a Transportation Improvement Plan and agree on how funds will be spent. 121 The Federal Transit Capital Investment Grants: Fixed Guideway Modernization Bus and Bus Facilities New Starts Program (CFDA Number 20.500) was utilized by 12 counties and two municipalities. This program is unique in any analysis of project and formula grants because this program offers both types of grants. Funds are allocated by formula to urbanized areas with a population greater than 200,000 and a current fixed guideway system over a mile long that is more than seven years old. The Federal Transit Authority notes on the program website122 that the program documents and 18 Preliminary Analysis of the HUD Provisions of the Omnibus Appropriations Bill for FY 2008, revised ' January 4, 2008; http://www.cbgg.org/l 2-21-07hous.htm. 19 Federal Grants to States and Localities Cut Deeply in Fiscal Year 2009 Federal Budget, February 4, 2008; http://www.cboo.ora/2-4-08sfp.htm. 120 httn:///www.fta.dot.nov/funding/arants/grants financing 3561.html. 121 Role of Designated Recipient and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) in Allocating Funds in a Transportation Management Area (TMA), ' hftg://www.fta.dot.-gov/funding/grants/grants rgants/grants financing 6995.html. ... http://www.fta.dot.gov/funding/grants/grants_financing 3558.html. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 81 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations references listed on the website are currently undergoing changes due to the implementation of SAFETEA-LU.123 The Formula Grants for Other than Urbanized Areas Program (CFDA Number 20.509) covers areas with a population less than 50,000 with a focus largely on improving the quality of life for residents of rural areas by providing greater access to "health care, shopping, education, employment, public services, and recreation," in part, through the development and support of intercity bus transportation, according to the Federal Transit Administration program website124 (which also provides a caveat pertaining to the implementation of SAFETEA-LU). This program was utilized by 21 counties and two municipalities. Federal Transit Metropolitan Planning Grants (CFDA Number 20.505) was utilized by 17 counties and four municipalities. This program illustrates a unique organizational structure whereby funds are allocated to the states, and then distributed by formula to Metropolitan Planning Organizations within the state to then be used in urbanized areas within the state. 125 The stated primary function of this program is to support "cooperative, continuous, and comprehensive planning for making transportation investment decisions in metropolitan areas and statewide ."125 Once again, a caveat regarding the implementation of SAFETEA-LU is provided. 3. Department of Health and Human Services The single HHS program in the top ten list is Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (CFDA Number 93.558) which was utilized by 18 counties and four municipalities. This program provides "broad flexibility to use the grant funds in any manner that meets the purposes of the program (including providing low-income households with assistance in meeting home heating and cooling costs)."1 -7 A comprehensive website is provided by HHS's Office of Family Assistance.128 4. Department of Justice The only Department of Justice program on the top ten list provides another example of the unique challenges which can occur in grant-seeking. The Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program (CFDA Number 16.592) no longer exists, but this program was utilized by 62 counties and 180 municipalities. The CFDA lists this program as "deleted" or "moved" to another agency; however, it provides no explanation or link to the current program. Further research shows that this program was not cut, but the administration process was changed, affecting not only this program but also the Edward Byrne 123 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/safetealu/index.htm. 124 http://www.fta.dot.gov/funding/grants/grants financing 3555.html. 125 http://12.46.245.173/pls/portal30/CATALOG.FIND _ASSISTANCE _PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 20.505. ' 128 httl2://www.fta.dot.c ov/fundin /rants/ rants financing 3563.html. 127 http://12.46.245.173/pls/portal3O/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 93.558. 128 http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/. , 82 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments I Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. According to DOJ, the Justice Assistance Grant "replaces the Byrne Formula and Local Law Enforcement Block Grant programs with a single funding mechanism that simplifies the administration process for grantees .02 Furthermore, activities funded under either previous program are eligible for funding under the new Justice Assistance Grant Program. These changes are not particularly recent and this passage is not intended to inform local governments of this specific change, but instead to highlight that as the federal government attempts to simplify the application and management process, changes will occur and local governments must be cognizant of this fact in order to avoid losing out on funding opportunities. E. Special Designations An additional means by which local governments can maximize their grant-seeking capabilities is being aware of designations or unique local situations which qualify them for grants. Designations such as the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) can qualify local governments for specific grants. Similarly, a specific number of AIDS cases as reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention qualifies local governments for certain HUD and HHS programs. Thresholds in terms of population can alter the way in which certain formula grant programs are administered. Other programs targeting specific populations, such as the USDA Rural Economic Development Program, are administered within an agency, but can still provide access ¦ # to a substantial number of grants. 1. High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas The Office of National Drug Control Policy (a part of the Executive Office of the President) administers the HIDTA program and lists grants for eligible areas that ' include, but are not limited to: • Indian Country Alcohol and Drug Prevention Program ' (CFDA Number 16.616) • Byrne Discretionary Program (CFDA Number 16.580) • Drug Court Discretionary Grant Program (CFDA Number 16.585) • Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities National Program (CFDA Number 84.184) • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services: Projects of Regional and ' National Significance (CFDA Number 93.243) • Drug Free Communities Support Programs Grants (CFDA Number 93.276) These programs can allow local governments not only to mitigate a potential hazard, but ' also to improve the overall quality of life in the community. In Florida, there are three groups of counties which meet this designation as High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas: North Florida has Alachua, Baker, Clay, Columbia, Duval, Flagler, Marion, Nassau, 129 http://www.omp.gov/BJA/grant/aag.htmi. 1 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 83 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Putnam, and St. Johns. Central Florida comprises Pinellas, Hillsborough, Polk, Osceola, Orange, Seminole, and Volusia. South Florida includes Broward, Miami- Dade, Monroe, and Palm Beach. In all, 21 out of 67 counties meet this designation The three DOJ grants associated with this designation are: Indian Country Alcohol and Drug Prevention Program (CFDA Number 16.616); Byrne Discretionary Program (CFDA Number 16.580); and, Drug Court Discretionary Grant Program (CFDA Number 16.585). The Indian Country Alcohol and Drug Prevention Program limits applicants to federally recognized tribal governments, and given that this is outside the scope of this analysis, the program will not be profiled. The Byrne Discretionary Program's stated objective is to "provide leadership and direction in controlling the use and availability of illegal drugs and to improve the functioning of the criminal justice system, with emphasis on violent crime and serious offenders."13 The FY 2007 Grant Announcement contains a comprehensive summary of the program and is available online at hftp://www.oip.usdoa.gov/BJA/-qrant/07BvLneDiscSol.pd f. The Drug Court Discretionary Grant Program's stated objective is to "develop and implement treatment drug courts that effectively integrate substance abuse treatment, mandatory drug testing, sanctions and incentives, and transitional services." 131 Although the 2008 application period is now closed, a comprehensive website that includes related programs is available online at http;//www.ojp.usdoLgov/BJA/grant/drugcourts.html. A single Department of Education program is available as a result of the HIDTA designation, the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities National Program (CFDA Number 84.184). The stated objective of this program is to "enhance the nation's efforts to prevent the illegal use of drugs and violence among, and promote safety and discipline for students at all educational levels."' 32 Numerous awards are available under the auspices of this program and are listed under the heading "Drug- Violence Prevention - National Programs" via the Department of Education website, at hft ://www.ed. ov/about/offices/list/osdfs/ ro rams.htmINumberstate. Two HHS programs are authorized through this designation, which seek to deal with the physical and mental effects of substance abuse. The first program is Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services: Projects of Regional and National Significance (CFDA Number 93.243), which "seeks to reduce the impact of alcohol and drug abuse on individuals, families, communities, and societies.033 The second program is Drug Free Communities Support Programs Grants (CFDA Number 93.276), which seeks to 130 http://12.46.245.173/pls/portal30/CATALOG. FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM_DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 16.580. 131 htt ://12.46.245.173/ Is/ ortal30/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 16.585. 132 httl2://12.46.245.1.73/pls/portal3O/CATALOG. FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 84.184. 133 httg://l2.46245.173//pIs/portal3O/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE _ PROGRAM _DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 93.243. 84 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations "increase the capacity of community coalitions to reduce substance abuse"134 through building coalitions. The nature of these programs indicates that this designation is intended to treat an area's problem holistically. Law enforcement and early intervention programs are available to combat the actual existence of the problem and health programs (both physical and mental) are available to combat the symptoms of the problem as it currently exists. 2. USDA Rural Development ' USDA operates a rural development program, http://www.rurdev_usda.gov/, offering grants and loans in three areas: utilities; housing and community programs; and, rural utilities programs to "increase economic opportunity and improve the quality of life for all rural Americans."135 This mission is accomplished through partnerships with local governments, businesses, and individuals. This program is somewhat more complicated for analytical purposes given that it offers a range of programs in the scope of the report and a range of programs not within this scope. According to the CFDA, there are 41 federal award programs offered through USDA Office of Rural Development, 15 fall within the scope of this project. Programs not included in this project comprise grants that local governments are not eligible to apply for, as well as forms of federal assistance other than grants, such as loans and direct payments. Four housing programs are offered through USDA Rural Development, which works with "a variety of public and non-profit organizations to provide housing options to communities throughout rural America.036 These programs are: • Farm Labor Housing Loans and Grants (CFDA Number 10.405) • Rural Rental Housing Loans (CFDA Number 10.415) • Rural Self-Help Housing Technical Assistance (CFDA Number 10.420) • Natural Disaster Loans and Grants (CFDA Number 10.444) It is important to note that the titles of several of these programs appear to exclude them from the sample; however, Rural Rental Housing Loans and Rural Self-Help Housing Technical Assistance both include a project grant aspect according to the CFDA, which leads to their inclusion. Farm Labor Housing Loans and Grants focus on providing safe and sanitary housing for domestic farm workers and have a wide variety of acceptable uses that contribute to this goal, including support facilities such as dining and day-care facilities. 137 The grant funds associated with Rural Rental Housing Loans are used for rental assistance in some properties financed through the loan portion of the 134 http://12.46.245.173/pis/portal3O/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, ' Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 93.276. 135 http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rd/aboutrd.html. 136 http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rhs/common/nonprofit intro.htm. 137 http://12.46.245.173/pis/portal3O/CATALOG.FIND_ASSISTANCE _PROGRAM _DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.405. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 85 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations program.133 Rural Self-Help Housing Technical Assistance award funds are for predevelopment grants to local governments and non-profit organizations that aid needy, very low, and low-income individuals and their families to build homes in rural areas by the self-help method. These funds are used for support assets and staff to help families in construction of their homes.139 Natural Disaster Loans and Grants were not utilized by local governments during the sample time frame; this is because these funds are only available "to the extent that funds are not provided by FEMA"140 and given the sizable "FEMA Effect" identified by this analysis there was no demonstrable need to supplement FEMA funds. These programs are believed to be underutilized in Florida and, as such, local governments are encouraged to explore funding opportunities presented through USDA Rural Development Housing Programs. Seven utility programs are offered through USDA Rural Development. They are: • Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities (CFDA Number 10.760) • Emergency Community Water Assistance Grants (CFDA Number 10.763) • Community Facilities Loans and Grants (CFDA Number 10.766) • Water and Waste Disposal Loans and Grants (CFDA Number 10.770) • Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loans and Grants (CFDA Number 10.855) • Public Television Station Digital Transition Grant Program (CFDA Number 10.861) • Community Connect Grant Program (CFDA Number 10.863) Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities provides strict guidelines for ' how the funds are spent, limiting expenditures to "installation, repair, improvement, or expansion of a rural water facility including distribution lines, well pumping facilities and costs related thereto, and the installation, repair, improvement, or expansion of a rural waste disposal facility including the collection, and treatment of sanitary, storm, and solid wastes.041 Furthermore, the program has detailed criteria regarding the financing ability of the local government and eligibility for loans versus grants, which should be ' explored by local governments before application. Emergency Community Water Assistance Grants address emergencies due to a decline in the quality of water, helping to meet the standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act. 142 138 http://12.46.245.173/pis/portal30/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.415. "' http://12.46.245.173/pis/portal30/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.420. 140 htt ://12.46.245.1731 Is/ ortal30/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.444. 141 http://12.46.245.173/pls/portal30/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE _ PROGRAM _DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.760. 142 http://l2.46.245.173/pis/portal30/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM_DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.763. ' 86 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 1 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Community Facilities Loans and Grants are used for a variety of projects supporting overall community development when the community cannot obtain commercial ' financing at a reasonable rate. 143 Water and Waste Disposal Loans and Grants are used to "[p]rovide water and waste disposal facilities and services to low income rural communities whose residents face significant health risks."144 However, grants through this program are considered part of ' Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities except for federally recognized Indian tribes and certain rural communities along the Mexican border. ' Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loans and Grants are used to encourage "telemedicine, telecommunications, computer networks, and related advanced technologies to provide educational and medical benefits"145 in rural areas. The Public Television Station Digital Transition Grant Program helps local governments update their public television stations with the digital transition process. This program is open to any public television station. However, the program was not authorized until 2006 and thus is not in the sample time frame of this report. 146 ' The Community Connect Grant Program applies to applicants "who will deploy broadband transmission service in rural communities where such service does riot currently exist; who will connect all critical community facilities such as local schools, ' education centers, libraries, hospitals, health care providers, law enforcement agencies, public safety organizations, fire, and rescue services, as well as residents and businesses; and who will operate a community center which provides free and open access to area residents." 7 Because the program was not authorized until 2005 it does not appear in this report's dataset; however, the USDA maintains a program website at: http://www.usda.gov/rus/telecom/commconnect.htm. These programs provide a wide range of options for facilities that will aid in the economic development of rural communities. Local governments in Florida have participated in the Community Facilities and Water and Waste Disposal Systems and are encouraged to explore additional utility programs offered by USDA Rural Development. 143 h .//l2.46.245.173/pls/portal3O/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.766. 14 htt://l2.46.245.173/ Is/ ortal30/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.770. 145 htt ://l2.46.245.173/ Is/ ortal30/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.855. 146 http://12.46.245.173/pls/portal3O/CATALOG; FIND_ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.861. 147 htt ://l2.46.245.173/ Is/ ortal30/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.863. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 87 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Business.Programs offered through USDA Rural Development are: • Rural Business Enterprise Grants (CFDA Number 10.769) • Rural Business Opportunity Grants (CFDA Number 10.773) • Rural Economic Development Loans and Grants (CFDA Number 10.854) A final business program, the Empowerment Zones Program, is not included because USDA is not authorized by Congress to designate new "Empowerment Zones." Rural Business Enterprise Grants are intended to support small businesses in rural areas by improving the quality of the local workforce through education. Funds can be spent on a variety of projects ranging from acquisition of land for an education facility to expanding infrastructure to accommodate the facility. 148 Rural Business Opportunity Grants assist businesses by "providing technical assistance, training, and planning for business and economic development. "149 Rural Economic Development Loans and Grants aid in job creation projects for "[e]lectric and telephone utilities that have current loans with the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) or Rural Telephone Bank loans or guarantees outstanding and are not delinquent on any Federal debt or in bankruptcy proceed ings"150 which could certainly include enterprise activities by local governments. These programs are not widely used by local governments within the sample and should be examined as a potential means of increasing draw-down of federal funds. An aspect of USDA Rural Development that local governments should be aware of is the relatively low or non existing matching requirements. Only four of the programs actually require a match, with a maximum of 20 percent local funding. From a technical perspective, it is also noteworthy that funds for many programs are distributed by states, at least partly due to rural population and then passed-through as project grants to local governments. USDA operates a state office for Florida as well as area offices responsible for specific counties. Contact information is available via the Internet, for the state office via h_ttp://www.rurdev.usda.gov/fl/so list.htm and for area offices at http://www.rurdev.usda.goV/fl/ao list.htm with counties served by each area office also available via this website. Furthermore, USDA Economic Research Service operates a federal funds page with a broad range of information from funding information (for all federal assistance, not compatible with the sample) to a history of federal rural development at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/RuralDevelopment/FederalFunds.htm. 14" http://l2.46_245.173/pls/portal3O/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.769. 149 htip_//12.46.245.173/pls/portal3O/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.773. 150 http://12.46.245.173/pls/portal3O/CATALOG.FIND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DYN.show, Search by Program Number, Enter Program Number 10.854. 88 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations CHAPTER FIVE Recommendations and Conclusion As mentioned earlier, the LCIR issues an annual report assessing Florida's receipt of federal funds. That report enumerates a series of recommendations for the state to pursue in order to increase its share of federal dollars. Some of those recommendations are listed below in a form tailored for local governments, as well as new recommendations. A. Recommendations Local governments should take the following steps to increase their receipt of federal grant funds: • Register with www.Grants._gov and take full advantage of all this interactive website has to offer. • As www.Grants.gov continues to evolve, local governments should provide the website with feedback on issues that could bear improvement, such as timeframes, and uniformity of application processes and forms. • Collaborate with other local governments and regional entities to explore meeting eligibility requirements of certain grants. • Using the data posted on the LCIR's website, www.floridalcir. ov, local governments can compare themselves with neighboring or similarly situated local governments to ascertain whether they are taking full advantage of all available grant opportunities. • Once suitable grants have been identified to pursue, local government staff should develop a direct rapport with personnel from the granting agency through phone and e-mail contact whenever possible. • Conduct cost-benefit analyses to assess the fiscal value of hiring one or more grant-writers. • Identify federal and state policy changes needed to enhance Florida's access to federal funding streams. • Support state efforts to form coalitions with similarly-situated states to pursue changes in outdated or inequitable federal funding formulas. • Work with the state and Congress to implement changes to federal funding formulas determined to be outdated or inequitable. • Vigorously pursue increased availability of state matching funds or other locally available funds, using a variety of resources, including those listed in Appendix F. • Invest in training provided at the state and local levels for accessing federal (and state) grant funding. • Increase communication and coordination on federal funding issues among state agencies, the Governor's office, the Florida Washington Office, the Legislature, and the Congressional Delegation using, among others, the resources listed in Appendix F, where appropriate. Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments 89 Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations • When competing with local governments from other states for non-formula grants, enlist assistance from Congressional Offices, who are typically able to provide letters of support. The Department of Environmental Protection may wish to consider: • Advocating for amendment to Governor's Executive Order 95-359 to clarify and streamline the role and function of the Single Point of Contact housed in the Department of Environmental Protection, and any appropriate statutory changes to s. 403.061(40), F.S. • Alternatively, evaluating the benefit to the state and local governments of the SPOC and determining whether the SPOC should be dispensed with or maintained. B. Conclusion It is clear that current economic conditions warrant local governments maximizing all potential funding sources. In response to Congressional direction, the federal government established www.Grantsgov, an interactive website that makes it easier for local governments, and others, to pursue federal grants. Local governments are ' advised to take advantage of this resource to the fullest extent. Additionally, the LCIR, in conjunction with other governmental associations, continues to make concerted efforts to reach out to local governments through newsletters, web links, and other ' means, to ensure that information regarding federal grants is shared with as many localities as possible. Finally, LCIR staff will provide updates to this report as data becomes available and will identify specific topics for further analysis. ' 90 Federal Grants to Florida's Local Governments Index of Appendices S Page No. Appendix A: Annual Unadjusted Expenditure Data ........................................93 ' Counties .............................................................................................................................................. 94 Municipalities ..................................................................................................................................... 98 ' Appendix B: Annual Adjusted Expenditure Data ...........................................111 Counties ............................................................................................................................................ 112 Municipalities ................................................................................................................................... 116 Appendix C: Annual Unadjusted Expenditure Data ......................................129 1 Department of Homeland Security ................................................................................................... 130 Counties ........................................................................................................................ 130 Municipalities...... .134 Department of Housing and Urban Development ............................................................................. 144 Counties ................................................................................................................................... 144 Municipalities .......................................................................................................................... 146 1 Department of Health and Human Services ...................................................................................... 152 Counties ................................................................................................................................... 152 Municipalities .......................................................................................................................... 154 CDepartmentounties of .............Transportation ............................................................................................ ............. 156 .............. ... ................................................................ . .................................... 156 ' Municipalities .......................................................................................................................... 158 Department of Justice ....................................................................................................................... 160 Counties ................................................................................................................................... 160 Municipalities .......................................................................................................................... 164 Appendix D: Lexington, South Carolina Success Story ..................................175 Appendix E: Survey Instrument .......................................................................179 Appendix F: Resource List .................................................................................185 1 91 This page was intentionally left blank. 92 Appendix A: Unadjusted Expenditures 1 93 Appendix A Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 -2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $1,535,518 $4,077,881 $3,478,856 $1,325,718 $1,103,757 Baker $622,072 $1,343,243 $190,756 $0 $56,294 Bay $616,097 $1,767,619 $2,579,949 $1,224,669 $4,191,370 Bradford $0 $705,231 $0 $0 $0 Brevard $17,002,726 $25,744,342 $26,560,476 $9,410,509 $7,653,860 Broward $86,007,793 $63,563,031 $53,544,826 $61,131,633 $56,080,568 Calhoun $8,997,366 $2,830,170 $1,392,092 $1,836,723 $10,304,233 Charlotte $4,500,772 $28,628,670 $26,334,043 $848,121 $474,999 Citrus $2,418,793 $8,913,514 $2,489,685 $1,539,758 $1,063,619 Clay $965,451 $1,929,380 $1,574,303 $2,092,740 $1,286,545 Collier $37,152,546 $6,556,908 $8,692,508 $6,796,338 $5,433,457 Columbia $0 $0 $0 $159,682 $446,429 Desoto $8,765,318 $0 $17,799,453 $531,797 $122,491 Dixie $929,276 $895,917 $397,968 $302,667 $531,465 Escambia $44,069,607 $194,924,460 $19,618,759 $8,393,846 $8,657,215 Fla ler $593,430 $706,477 $2,954,162 $652,593 $886,720 Franklin $0 $706,382 $126,101 $58,003 $0 Gadsden $647,429 $252,172 $165,818 $246,337 $323,215 Gilchrist $443,623 $340,472 $0 $227 $162,177 Glades $469,968 $176,670 $595,765 $0 $0 Gulf $1,169,513 $917,533 $0 $412,630 $118,842 Hamilton $79,489 $313,161 $8,000 $75,067 $752,618 Hardee $2,580,366 $9,419,845 $225,300 $3,332,837 $201,923 Hernando $3,204,279 $5,254,588 $2,399,496 $1,757,656 $580,956 Highlands $720,667 $3,308,035 $765,260 $204,340 $825,213 Hillsborough $41,425,102 $74,423,957 $43,948,827 $43,359,370 $42,312,037 Holmes $1,102,976 $1,237,700 $314,520 $1,534,486 $3,460,558 Indian River $4,552,148 $13,772,974 $9,479,740 $1,157,234 $1,017,880 Jackson $106,808 $1,318,015 $168,734 $541,865 $426,950 Jefferson $278,152 $589,309 $0 $62,579 $0 Lake $2,625,016 $16,016,488 $6,527,018 $1,358,923 $1,969,673 Lee $33,271,617 $17,561,553 $46,034,726 $29,643,101 $16,372,752 Leon $990,941 $1,959,532 $2,730,963 $1,323,008 $1,671,117 Levy $418,603 $237,672 .$436,085 $352,771 $163,316 Liberty $922,692 $1,623,697 $394,449 $82,659 $528,236 Madison $1,230,667 $0 $0 $0 $0 Manatee $7,996,920 $17,427,311 $11,409,497 $3,506,242 $8,738,423 Marion $4,056,992 $18,919,975 $8,259,121 $2,016,460 $778,019 Martin $15,185,836 $18,934,771 $8,508,534 $1,617,377 $1,445,664 Miami-Dade $288,214,443 $226,937,446 $250,769,873 $293,570,540 $274,328,529 Monroe $21,813,011 $8,515,802 $4,121,993 $21,132,703 $3,735,224 Nassau $896,056 $538,262 $210,160 $0 $26,497 Okaloosa $4,512,276 $16,160,865 $27,060,614 $4,261,308 $3,399,640 Okeechobee $0 $1,320,930 $562,924 $230,626 $412,240 Orange $42,199,697 $52,394,435 $80,093,158 $32,752,972 $39,609,107 Osceola $1,888,579 $10,876,663 $12,102,663 $1,033,775 $1,522,209 Palm Beach $85,217,001 $98,254,423 $86,958,612 $55,805,795 $51,970,609 94 Appendix A Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Pasco $7,392,197 $11,982,049 $7,590,603 .$9,354,477 $7,667,167 Pinellas $28,856,582 $23,823,139 $20,253,901 $22,918,685 $15,979,714 Polk $15,360,762 $41,373,069 $23,179,505 $12,260,153 $11,445,565 Putnam $1,312,386 $2,458,805 $706,474 $661,904 $442,301 Saint Johns $3,775,953 $4,521,212 $3,121,786 $692,701 $657,672 Saint Lucie $3,922,531 $5,378,513 $7,649,823 $2,461,878 $2,505,359 Santa Rosa $7,755,630 $56,636,338 $3,128,282 $2,951,975 $693,892 Sarasota $5,091,671 $9,645,677 $9,603,945 $6,342,878 $9,596,812 Seminole $7,391,354 $26,513,388 $20,177,772 $7,561,303 $4,486,295 Sumter $776,803 $1,232,903 $987,902 $143,088 $271,844 Suwannee $200,099 $1,015,603 $322,970 $142,801 $250,806 Taylor $0 $639,621 $0 $0 $0 Union $0 $0 $454,350 $0 $252,728 Volusia $22,929,987 $33,780,256 $35,502,431 $19,706,473 $23,524,033 Wakulla $0 $679,382 $321,638 $380,162 $1,731,647 Walton $1,925,368 $6,965,623 $468,994 $23,544 $482,582 Washington $1,283,393 $972,883 $3,060 $2,827,379 $1,198,885 Statewide Total $890,372,348 $1,189,915,942 $905,459,223 $686,107,086 $636,333,948 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" hftp://harvester.census.gov/sac/d issem/accessotions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records Ll 1 95 Appendix A Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $6.30 $16.94 $14.73 $5.73 $4.83 Baker $24.88 $56.08 $7.96 $0.00 $2.45 Bay $3.72 $10.93 $16.28 $0.00 $27.54 Bradford $0.00 $25.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Brevard $31.31 $48.39 $50.94 $18.53 $15.49 Broward $49.06 $36.51 $31.07 $35.99 $33.60 Calhoun $637.52 $202.95 $102.28 $136.67 $778.79 Charlotte $28.07 $185.86 $167.75 $5.58 $3.20 Citrus $17.69 $67.20 $19.28 $12.24 $8.65 Clay $5.46 $11.37 $9.63 $13.41 $8.58 Collier $113.74 $20.63 $28.39 $23.24 $19.58 Columbia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.71 $7.65 DeSoto $264.30 $0.00 $521.90 $15.77 $3.73 Dixie $59.28 $58.26 $26.66 $20.61 $36.76 Escambia $142.32 $642.00 $63.86 $27.67 $28.91 Fla ler $6.66 $8.99 $42.39 $10.60 $15.62 Franklin $0.00 $65.13 $11.84 $5.53 $0.00 Gadsden $13.43 $5.29 $3.54 $5.30 $7.04 Gilchrist $26.56 $20.99 $0.00 $0.01 $10.80 Glades $43.53 $16.47 $55.51 $0.00 $0.00 Gulf $70.84 $55.68 $0.00 $26.43 $7.82 Hamilton $5.48 $21.88 $0.56 $5.35 $54.05 Hardee $94.92 $344.63 $8.11 $121.64 $7.36 Hernando $20.41 $34.85 $16.52 $12.49 $4.26 Highlands $7.45 $35.40 $8.31 $2.26 $9.27 Hillsborough $35.58 $65.77 $39.65 $40.16 $40.08 Holmes $56.56 $64.61 $16.54 $81.02 $184.98 Indian River $33.65 $105.91 $74.74 $9.55 $8.62 Jackson $2.13 $26.52 $3.45 $11.06 $8.95 Jefferson $19.38 $41.40 $0.00 $4.62 $0.00 Lake $9.48 $60.90 $25.91 $5.65 $8.52 Lee $56.82 $31.96 $88.32 $59.87 $34.46 Leon $3.64 $7.23 $10.35 $5.18 $6.74 Levy $10.74 $6.26 $11.63 $9.62 $4.53 Libert $118.72 $214.18 $53.64 $11.44 $73.81 Madison $62.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Manatee $25.94 $57.26 $38.64 $12.22 $31.51 Marion $12.88 $62.05 $28.16 $7.15 $2.87 Martin $106.46 $134.23 $61.82 $12.03 $11.03 Miami-Dade $118.27 $93.70 $105.37 $125.14 $118.63 Monroe $270.94 $103.33 $50.74 $262.40 $46.03 Nassau $13.14 $8.19 $3.23 $0.00 $0.43 Okaloosa $23.42 $85.53 $145.66 $23.53 $19.21 Okeechobee $0.00 $34.98 $14.81 $6.19 $11.28 Orange $39.09 $50.21 $78.99 $33.31 $41.44 Osceola $7.38 $46.25 $53.60 $4.91 $7.87 Palm Beach $66.16 $77.62 $70.00 $46.07 $43.92 96 Appendix A Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Pasco $17.42 $29.45 $19.47 $24.92 $21.21 Pinellas $30.44 $25.14 $21.46 $24.39 $17.11 Polk $27.18 $76.36 $43.87 $23.95 $22.78 Putnam $17.64 $33.33 $9.65 $9.20 $6.20 Saint Johns $22.84 $28.75 $20.90 $4.95 $4.91 Saint Lucie $15.13 $22.41 $33.82 $11.62 $12.32 Santa Rosa $54.84 $415.09 $23.39 $22.90 $5.55 Sarasota $13.42 $26.22 $26.80 $18.19 $28.25 Seminole $17.57 $64.39 $50.02 $19.15 $11.57 Sumter $9.40 $16.65 $14.87 $2.27 $4.43 Suwannee $5.16 $26.60 $8.56 $3.84 $7.02 Taylor $0.00 $30.02 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Union $0.00 $0.00 $31.08 $0.00 $18.32 Volusia $45.51 $68.29 $73.31 $41.86 $51.17 Wakulla $0.00 $25.29 $12.61 $15.24 $71.51 Walton $34.51 $130.14 $9.28 $0.50 $10.60 Washington $55.62 $42.12 $0.14 $129.03 $55.38 Statewide Average $48.94 $73.83 $45.30 $28.61 $37.06 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" http://harvester.census.aov/sac/dissem/accessoptions.htmI?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 97 Appendix A Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua Alachua $831,906 $686,148 $19,540 $3,221 $0 Archer Alachua $0 $335,013 $0 $0 $0 Gainesville Alachua $8,470,345 $16,057,266 $8,310,868 $6,270,845 $5,767,563 Hawthorne Alachua $0 $0 $788,000 $0 $0 High Springs Alachua $0 $0 $3,956,983 $430,256 $0 Macclenn Baker $0 $0 $0 $5,626 $41,049 Cedar Grove Bay $501,824 $3,755,865 $835,144 $2,470,631 $0 Lynn Haven Bay $0 $0 $0 $439,325 $348,519 Mexico Beach Bay $519399 $0 $0 $0 $0 Panama City Bay $1,082,531 $2,441,004 $867,425 $884,094 $572,194 Panama City Beach Bay $523,656 $496,921 $11,261 $13,916 $51,769 Parker Bay $25,378 $0 $0 $0 $0 Springfield Bay $0 $27,347 $123,785 $17,538 $81,790 Hampton Bradford $0 $0 $0 $5,005 $0 Lawtey Bradford $0 $1,249,594 $0 $0 $0 Starke Bradford $48,515 $297,877 $0 $0 $0 Cocoa Brevard $1,228,146 $814,622 $1,580,856 $619,693 $543,744 Cocoa Beach Brevard $0 $426,394 $560,000 $0 $0 Malabar Brevard $0 $0 $0 $513,193 $0 Melbourne Brevard $4,072,390 $3,335,502 $9,208,126 $2,985,743 $4,549,767 Palm Bay Brevard $2,477,271 $5,096,588 $5,102,949 $1,380,370 $1,023,713 Rockledge Brevard $0 $586,838 $0 $0 $50,385 Satellite Beach Brevard $221,727 $0 $0 $3,798 $0 Titusville Brevard $799,640 $1,217,574 $1,629,113 $735,112 $1,514,166 Cooper City Broward $0 $0 $0 $0 $273,689 Coral Springs Broward $20,586,908 $2,054,159 $3,020,628 $527,548 $765,905 Dania Beach Broward $2,671,996 $870,894 $441,664 $318,243 $398,062 Davie Broward $0 $1,715,100 $1,900,980 $721,642 $1,128,413 Deerfield Beach Broward $9,723,358 $1,344,666 $2,566,932 $446,804 $667,337 Fort Lauderdale Broward $53,703,276 $18,964,999 $19,844,036 $14,164,076 $16,106,650 Hallandale Beach Broward $3,260,924 $1,513,863 $1,258,151 $667,442 $857,902 Hollywood Broward $26,333,740 $6,836,272 $6,895,604 $3,651,391 $5,170,962 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $2,797,423 $0 $0 $0 $0 Lauderhill Broward $7,019,319 $0 $1,564,545 $0 $0 Mar ate Broward $7,976,847 $1,119,082 $948,031 $619,073 $657,460 Miramar Broward $13,434,348 $2,221,661 $1,014,038 $832,032 $906,733 North Lauderdale Broward $3,837,031 $521,759 $803,166 $370,472 $355,748 Oakland Park Broward $6,011,699 $1,155,666 $1,361,711 $420,326 $0 Parkland Broward $0 $0 $762,811 $0 $0 Pembroke Park Broward $0 $0 $0 $0 .$343,414 Pembroke Pines Broward $32,055,716 $2,645,870 $2,075,658 $925,201 $1,028,584 Plantation Broward $23,280,141 $2,686,730 $2,089,284 $326,348 $504,431 Pom ano Beach Broward $11,205,066 $1,979,946 $3,075,362 $2,589,782 $2,801,796 Southwest Ranches Broward $8,730,275 $951,824 $0 $0 $0 Sunrise Broward $8,668,881 $1,393,538 $1,550,816 $1,192,917 $941,883 Tamarac Broward $7,820,314 $493,589 $1,347,911 $799,738 $710,618 Weston Broward $5,627,447 $0 $582,844 $0 $0 98 Appendix A Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Munici ali County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Wilton Manors Broward $0 $0 $471,115 $0 $0 Altha Calhoun $0 $0 $0 $60,681 $0 Blountstown Calhoun $78,150 $40,691 $0 $48,288 $0 Punta Gorda Charlotte $0 $0 $0 $1,017,960 $0 Crystal River Citrus $0 $309,334 $284,218 0 $37,105 Green Cove Springs Clay $9,260 $80,084 $269,709 $10,094 $11,688 Everglades Collier $980,065 $0 $0 $0 $1,133,877 Marco Island Collier $832,068 $0 $533,992 $0 $0 Naples Collier $6,780,331 $720,565 $470,573 $485,292 $0 Lake City Columbia $0 $0 $734,123 $589,713 $0 Arcadia De Soto $0 $583,680 $682,299 $170,867 $0 Cross City Dixie $0 $78,454 $2,570 $27,327 $1,676 Atlantic Beach Duval $0 $0 $0 $195,460 $0 Baldwin Duval $0 $59,399 $38,400 $0 $0 Jacksonville Duval $29,519,849 $33,922,185 $42,829,758 $33,141,924 $29,067,132 Jacksonville Beach Duval $0 $0 $1,498,978 $404,392 $414,214 Neptune Beach Duval $0 $0 $0 $113,302 $0 Pensacola Escambia $24,369,411 $50,231,007 $6,482,541 $4,642,403 $3,725,620 Bunnell Flagler $522,151 $0 $0 $0 $0 Palm Coast Flagler $63,067 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fla ler Beach Flagler Nolusia $4,886 $0 $0 $0 $0 Apalachicola Franklin $0 $0 $665,228 $3,881,040 $0 Carrabelle Franklin $0 $0 $0 $46,814 $1,147,800 Chattahoochee Gadsden $0 $1,804,878 $0 $0 $0 Greensboro Gadsden $0 $0 $0 $21,040 $0 Havana Gadsden $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,812 Quincy Gadsden $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,740 Fannin Springs Gilchrist/Levy $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,800 Moore Haven Glades $178,672 $0 $0 $0 $0 Port Saint Joe Gulf $0 $0 $0 $343,801 $0 White Springs Hamilton $0 $48,510 $0 $35,683 $2,041,428 Bowling Green Hardee $0 $0 $0 $2,991 $0 Wauchula Hardee $127,042 $693,123 $5,349,422 $787,408 $0 Zolfo Springs Hardee $0 $0 $209,586 $0 $0 Brooksville Hernando $0 $0 $323,183 $151,401 $96,681 Avon Park Highlands $0 $829,894 $472,43$ $90,364 $1,301,145 Lake Placid Highlands $3,771 $0 $78,045 $5,982 $0 Sebring Highlands $465,758 $1,488,883 $1,101,937 $101,090 $296,906 Plant City Hillsborough $416,344 $2,231,564 $0 $1,015,280 $2,022,533 Tama Hillsborough $15,245,191 $19,563,601 $25,879,727 $24,451,749 $18,428,556 Temple Terrace Hillsborough $46,479 $1,001,267 $0 $155,107 $0 Bonifa Holmes $1,603,752 $1,573,723 $0 $0 $0 Fellsmere Indian River $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800 Indian River Shores Indian River $0 $0 $221,070 $0 $0 Sebastian Indian River $0 $4,169,407 $1,561,113 $726,669 $0 Vero Beach Indian River $496,877 $12,474,610 $8,961,938 $2,219,431 $1,605,880 99 Appendix A Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alford Jackson $126,842 $509,993 $0 $0 $0 Graceville Jackson $0 $1,000 $0 $66,546 $0 Grand Ridge Jackson $0 $183,134 $0 $0 $72,675 Marianna Jackson $2,505,291 $3,231,288 $286,649 $506,251 $126,989 Sneads Jackson $0 $0 $0 $2,885,643 $0 Monticello Jefferson $0 $0 $0 $265,292 $0 Clermont Lake $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,261 Eustis Lake $0 $258,033 $311,993 $0 $61,252 Leesburg Lake $503,397 $941,636 $1,418,740 $990,884 $122,626 Mascotte Lake $0 $0 $0 $32,534 $0 Mount Dora Lake $5,195 $0 $576,039 $55,085 $0 Tavares Lake $3,438 $64,882 $142,723 $10,145 $0 Bonita S rin s Lee $767,441 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cape Coral Lee $4,036,695 $9,218,115 $9,402,558 $867,814 $803,560 Fort Myers Lee $3,888,147 $3,124,567 $5,508,624 $1,233,763 $1,318,437 Fort Myers Beach Lee $675,789 $769,371 $584,995 $390,389 $0 Sanibel Lee $1,866,657 $2,631,011 $3,663,806 $22,650 $7,250 Tallahassee Leon $12,961,786 $15,920,442 $17,326,878 $15,791,567 $12,340,863 Chiefland Levy $0 $53,414 $0 $0 $18,633 Williston Levy $0 $147,496 $283,307 $9,149 $0 Yankeetown Levy $0 $92,096 $0 $0 $0 Lee Madison $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 Bradenton Manatee $817,659 $515,670 $1,250,798 $913,564 $1,071,066 Palmetto Manatee $0 $365,686 $0 $248,338 $0 Longboat Key Manatee /Sarasota $58,204 $0 $0 $0 $0 Belleview Marion $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,391 Dunnellon Marion $0 $204,099 $0 $0 $0 Ocala Marion $4,839,007 $7,198,519 $4,975,452 $2,502,649 $1,184,699 Jupiter Island Martin $4,962,064 $1,457,818 $0 $0 $950,679 Stuart Martin $1,168,356 $1,331,999 $0 $0 $0 Aventura Miami-Dade $1,628,227 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bay Harbor Islands Miami-Dade $0 $0 $0 $4,606 $0 Biscayne Park Miami-Dade $878,972 $0 $0 $0 $0 Coral Gables Miami-Dade $13,138,137 $10,135,604 $1,492,678 $0 $0 El Portal Miami-Dade $596,390 $0 $0 $0 $0 Florida City Miami-Dade $0 $0 $478,140 $1,181,760 $1,046,986 Golden Beach Miami-Dade $117,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 Hialeah Miami-Dade $16,517,648 $13,769,441 $7,673,103 $8,619,773 $7,821,996 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $618,168 $0 $0 $0 $0 Homestead Miami-Dade $8,557,939 $775,925 $1,720,773 $2,267,875 $1,347,348 Key Biscayne Miami-Dade $0 $656,112 $0 $0 $0 Medley Miami-Dade $1,168,050 $21,994 $0 $0 $353,767 Miami Miami-Dade $53,888,688 $62,552,088 $35,186,592 $30,818,447 $47,130,713 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0 $8,618,998 $5,177,550 $6,374,187 $6,915,503 North Bay Miami-Dade $488,573 $0 $0 $0 $0 North Miami Miami-Dade $8,382,065 $2,098,678 $6,475,684 $2,301,049 $2,102,796 100 Appendix A Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $5,893,991 $3,233,237 $1,492,563 $813,856 $503,873 O a-locka Miami-Dade $4,715,937 $15,993,457 $5,957,295 $5,875,324 $0 Pineerest Miami-Dade $850,819 $0 $0 $0 $0 South Miami Miami-Dade $2,151,796 $2,152,524 $650,470 $1,153,944 $609,249 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $862,860 $1,617,754 $1,267,455 $1,804,789 $1,095,288 West Miami Miami-Dade $2,030,195 $6,594,756 $1,438,737 $687,435 $531,408 Islamorada Monroe $0 $1,935,976 $1,183,703 $0 $0 Key West Monroe $10,588,814 $3,354,478 $767,693 $4,359,286 $4,932,705 Marathon Monroe $4,179,723 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fernandina Beach Nassau $6,267 $1,855,645 $1,269,427 $997,104 $0 Crestview Okaloosa $0 $89,566 $979,277 $0 $2,432,011 Destin Okaloosa $0 $2,043,216 $0 $0 $0 Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $645,108 $2,738,019 $2,357,560 $591,461 $565,174 Ma Esther Okaloosa $796,641 $623,697 $0 $0 $0 Niceville Okaloosa $2,515 $360,655 $435,750 $0 $0 Okeechobee Okeechobee $0 $952,979 $562,917 $0 $0 Apopka Orange $0 $0 $432,392 $192,666 $0 Belle Isle Orange $0 $0 $2,342,464 $0 $0 Maitland Orange $0 $777,582 $3,317,484 $3,560 $0 Oakland Orange $0 $0 $0 $1,824 $0 Ocoee Orange $0 $0 $0 $0 $861,870 Orlando Orange $14,395,514 $17,762,220 $18,365,970 $11,251,496 $9,230,003 Windermere Orange $0 $978,212 $912,479 $0 $0 Winter Garden Prange $0 $177,624 $335,296 $42,111 $0 Winter Park Orange $892,520 $9,988,395 $0 $123,707 $0 Kissimmee Osceola $3,423,762 $4,811,510 $6,684,146 $294,630 $1,066,493 Saint Cloud Osceola $379,013 $0 $2,275,235 $25,880 $10,150 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0 $599,336 $1,606,127 $187,625 $1,079,093 Boca Raton Palm Beach $18,106,273 $2,412,468 $5,248,299 $567,980 $725,588 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $5,071,601 $903,099 $2,205,552 $861,550 $884,089 Delray Beach Palm Beach $8,203,136 $2,131,011 $3,490,565 $1,685,701 $1,175,339 Greenacres Palm Beach $0 $0 $438,203 $0 $0 Highland Beach Palm Beach $108,068 $0 $58,147 $0 $47,690 Jupiter Palm Beach $1,388,630 $7,135,351 $1,543,656 $559,242 $702,936 Lake Worth Palm Beach $12,046,664 $2,449,056 $11,398,430 $0 $0 Lantana Palm Beach $696,506 $719,579 $0 $0 $0 Manalapan Palm Beach $0 $10,777 $0 $0 $0 North Palm Beach Palm Beach $650,265 $838,504 $0 $0 $0 Ocean Ride Palm Beach $221,434 $240,518 $0 $0 $0 Pahokee Palm Beach $0 $0 $0 $0 $69,022 Palm Beach Palm Beach $6,999,051 $3,671,469 $1,906,071 $0 $0 Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach $2,839,571 $1,140,389 $2,128,902 $309,695 $0 Palm Springs Palm Beach $663,946 $0 $0 $0 $0 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $0 $1,881,862 $3,319,622 $1,541,802 $815,507 Royal Palm Beach Palm Beach $959,499 $0 $1,176,438 $0 $0 South Bay Palm Beach $0 $0 $0 $0 $734,832 Wellington Palm Beach $10,448,509 $0 $0 $0 $0 101 Appendix A Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 West Palm Beach Palm Beach $15,181,544 $12,566,827 $13,888,168 $8,371,195 $9,081,348 Dade City Pasco $0 $0 $0 $1,875,561 $1,460,806 New Port Riche Pasco $702,512 $0 $0 $0 $0 Port Richey Pasco $0 $507,669 $0 $113,188 $221,968 Zeph rhills Pasco $9,659 $0 $0 $0 $0 Clearwater Pinellas $3,803,288 $3,187,579 $3,049,828 $2,279,782 $2,769,967 Dunedin Pinellas $0 $2,090,718 $489,771 $170,270 $0 Largo Pinellas $3,111,478 $2,719,325 $1,687,806 $1,854,393 $455,129 Madeira Beach Pinellas $0 $0 $0 $301,892 $508,201 Oldsmar Pinellas $0 $0 $292,430 $86,067 $0 Pinellas Park Pinellas $145,468 $657,499 $545,824 $429,662 $190,854 Saint Petersburg Pinellas $6,930,094 $8,968,126 $8,333,913 $7,268,161 $9,733,847 Tarpon Springs Pinellas $0 $771,041 $708,362 $254,941 $316,695 Treasure Island Pinellas $86,470 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bartow Palk $479,633 $0 $2,241,769 $252,943 $301,172 Dundee Polk $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,182,946 Eagle Lake Polk $564,941 $131,207 $0 $0 $0 Fort Meade Polk $0 $0 $849,951 $0 $0 Frostproof Polk $0 $0 $3,567,098 $0 $0 Haines City Polk $164,897 $297,087 $1,254,281 $347,804 $83,628 Lake Alfred Polk $0 $0 $0 $28,951 $0 Lakeland Polk $4,584,525 $5,627,444 $18,487,818 $1,744,158 $2,944,772 Polk City Polk $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,126,292 Winter Haven Polk $953,653 $1,326,915 $0 $855,048 $698,533 Crescent City Putnam $0 $0 $0 $7,145 $984,558 Palatka Putnam $1,515,915 $809,296 $894,762 $0 $440,384 Welaka Putnam $98,206 $0 $0 $39,353 $0 Hastings Saint Johns $0 $16,109 $0 $0 $0 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $3,342,537 $9 851,484 $17;724,646 $419,639 $75,252 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $11,013,434 $12,623,007 $0 $2,200,744 $880,572 Gulf Breeze Santa Rosa $0 $5,791,581 $685,354 $0 $0 Jay Santa Rosa $26,670 $0 $0 $0 $753,229 Milton Santa Rosa $760,513 $3,072,336 $0 $0 $601,151 Sarasota Sarasota $6,067,551 $5,499,845 $5,446,952 $3,695,207 $4,565,329 Venice Sarasota $2,535,814 $0 $847,095 $41,916 $0 Altamonte Springs Seminole $0 $1,590,058 $1,891,538 $0 $0 Casselberry Seminole $0 $1,261,649 $1,738,335 $331,605 $761,721 Lake Ma Seminole $0 $0 $1,980,827 $0 $0 Longwood Seminole $0 $581,511 $1,215,102 $0 $0 Oviedo Seminole $0 $4,227,258 $3,911,808 $411,412 $305,795 Sanford Seminole $630,466 $832,755 $5,922,081 $1,476,864 $676,436 Winter Springs Seminole $0 $2,522,646 $5,290,766 $0 $0 Bushnell Sumter $0 $499,951 $0 $2,392,043 $2,049,390 Coleman Sumter $638,000 $670,923 $675,281 $664,100 $672,000 Wildwood Sumter $0 . $0 $0 $0 $12,238 Live Oak Suwannee $102,572 $131,079 $0 $0 $82,395 Perry Taylor $0 $8,471 $0 $0 $0 102 Appendix A Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Daytona Beach Volusia $3,237,951 $2,375,111 $6,974,198 $3,206,676 $1,945,994 Da ona Beach Shores Volusia $0 $0 $0 $58,448 $0 DeBa Volusia $0 $1,698,320 $1,842,474 $0 $0 DeLand Volusia $1,174,779 $534,669 $2,690,366 $558,088 $512,149 Deltona Volusia $0 $10,666,741 $5,461,770 $565,441 $354,305 Edgewater Volusia $0 $1,304,948 $2,498,724 $0 $0 Holl Hill Volusia $0 $771,483 $1,943,108 $0 $56,963 Lake Helen Volusia $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,235 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $909,506 $1,781,426 $2,011,243 $1,009,447 $658,016 Orange City Volusia $0 $410,180 $658,657 $0 $0 Ormond Beach Volusia $843,747 $1,792,836 $4,877,695 $0 $361,818 Ponce Inlet Volusia $5,383 $0 $0 $0 $0 Port Orange Volusia $626,012 $1,005,334 $7,012,783 $304,518 $331,867 Sopchoppy Wakulla $0 $0 $0 $154,866 $0 DeFuniak Springs Walton $2,626,519 $1,544,197 $121,711 $0 $0 Freeport Walton $0 $0 $2,916,243 $1,178,289 $969,910 Chi le Washin tan $61,285 $107,193 $106,860 $321,258 $1,059,170 Statewide Total $695,610,986 $579,056,894 $519,442,990 $277,858,657 $272,791,484 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" hft ://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records 103 Appendix A Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua Alachua $108.65 $92.70 $2.74 $0.48 $0.00 Archer Alachua $0.00 $272.37 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Gainesville Alachua $70.05 $133.93 $70.58 $53.51 $58.71 Hawthorne Alachua $0.00 $0.00 $576.44 $0.00 $0.00 High Springs Alachua $0.00 $0.00 $913.85 $102.30 $0.00 Macclenn Baker $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.16 $8.75 Cedar Grove Bay $79.34 $610.11 $141.98 $438.99 $0.00 Lynn Haven Bay $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $31.16 $26.39 Mexico Beach Bay $446.22 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Panama City Bay $28.84 $65.55 $23.31 $24.19 $15.71 Panama City Beach Bay $52.34 $55.39 $1.35 $1.76 $6.56 Parker Bay $5.41 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Springfield Bay $0.00 $3.03 $13.87 $1.98 $9.20 Hampton Bradford $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.83 $0.00 Lawte Bradford $0.00 $1,811.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Starke Bradford $8.02 $51.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cocoa Brevard $70.60 $46.27 $95.17 $37.89 $33.29 Cocoa Beach Brevard $0.00 $33.11 $43.58 $0.00 $0.00 Malabar Brevard $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $189.16 $0.00 Melbourne Brevard $53.07 $44.44 $123.36 $40.57 $62.49 Palm Bay Brevard $25.62 $55.47 $57.61 $16.24 $12.39 Rockledge Brevard $0.00 $23.87 $0.00 $0.00 $2.35 Satellite Beach Brevard $20.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.39 $0.00 Titusville Brevard $18.17 $27.83 $37.86 $17.41 $36.81 Cooper City Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9.62 Coral Springs Broward $158.83 $16.19 $23.84 $4.25 $6.24 Dania Beach Broward $93.57 $30.40 $15.73 $11.67 $14.65 Davie Broward $0.00 $20.48 $23.23 $9.05 $14.34 Deerfield Beach Broward $128.61 $17.89 $39.42 $6.90 $10.30 Fort Lauderdale Broward $305.42 $110.68 $116.53 $83.73 $103.73 Hallandale Beach Broward $90.98 $42.39 $35.71 $19.12 $25.05 Holl ood Broward $183.78 $47.80 $48.22 $25.61 $36.65 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $86.98 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Lauderhill Broward $111.18 $0.00 $27.00 $0.00 $0.00 Margate Broward $144.16 $20.35 $17.41 $11.45 $12.18 Miramar Broward $121.77 $20.50 $9.96 $8.67 $10.36 North Lauderdale Broward $92.27 $12.75 $19.94 $11.08 $10.72 Oakland Park Broward $141.70 $36.34 $42.81 $13.24 $0.00 Parkland Broward $0.00 $0.00 $39.37 $0.00 $0.00 Pembroke Park Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $51.80 Pembroke Pines Broward $211.19 $17.52 $13.80 $6.24 $7.10 Plantation Broward $274.24 $31.55 $24.69 $3.89 $6.03 Pompano Beach Broward $110.83 $19.47 $35.27 $30.00 $32.47 Southwest Ranches Broward $1,177.38 $127.81 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Sunrise Broward $96.68 $15.53 $17.43 $13.64 $10.83 Tamarac Broward $131.97 $8.41 $23.35 $14.06 $12.59 Weston Broward $91.31 $0.00 $9.61 $0.00 $0.00 104 Appendix A Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Wilton Manors Broward $0.00 $0.00 $38.36 $0.00 $0.00 Altha Calhoun $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $109.34 $0.00 Blountstown Calhoun $31.56 $16.58 $0.00 $20.00 $0.00 Punta Gorda Charlotte $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $62.62 $0.00 Crystal River Citrus $0.00 $83.38 $77.13 $0.00 $10.59 Green Cove Springs Clay $1.45 $1103 $45.28 $1.77 $2.11 Everglades Collier $1,859.71 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,232.04 Marco Island Collier $52.93 $0.00 $34.28 $0.00 $0.00 Naples Collier $295.18 $32.04 $20.97 $21.72 $0.00 Lake City Columbia $0.00 $0.00 $68.89 $55.37 $0.00 Arcadia De Soto $0.00 $87.53 $99.55 $24.91 $0.00 Cross City Dixie $0.00 $44.25 $1.43 $15.06 $0.91 Atlantic Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14.05 $0.00 Baldwin Duval $0.00 $36.31 $23.40 $0.00 $0.00 Jacksonville Duval $35.36 $41.54 $53.81 $42.36 $37.96 Jacksonville Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $69.58 $19.12 $19.67 Neptune Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15.70 $0.00 Pensacola Escambia $442.81 $916.17 $115.01 $82.45 $66.21 Bunnell Fla ler $207.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Palm Coast Flagler $0.93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fla ler Beach Flagler Nolusia $0.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Apalachicola Franklin $0.00 $0.00 $275.80 $1,625.91 $0.00 Carrabelle Franklin $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $35.93 $896.02 Chattahoochee Gadsden $0.00 $462.67 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Greensboro Gadsden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $33.13 $0.00 Havana Gadsden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6.88 Quincy Gadsden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7.29 Fannin Springs Gilchrist/Levy $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.21 Moore Haven Glades $109.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Port Saint Joe Gulf $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $94.66 $0.00 White Springs Hamilton $0.00 $62.84 $0.00 $45.11 $2,558.18 Bowling Green Hardee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.99 $0.00 Wauchula Hardee $28.52 $168.56 $1,214.40 $181.98 $0.00 Zolfo Springs Hardee $0.00 $0.00 $126.10 $0.00 $0.00 Brooksville Hernando $0.00 $0.00 $44.40 $20.75 $13.32 Avon Park Highlands $0.00 $94.53 $53.86 $10.51 $151.90 Lake Placid Highlands $2.14 $0.00 $45.51 $3.55 $0.00 Sebring Highlands $45.58 $146.91 $109.77 $10.26 $30.34 Plant City Hillsborough $12.68 $68.86 $0.00 $31.89 $63.77 Tama Hillsborough $46.07 $59.92 $79.96 $76.83 $59.09 Tem le Terrace Hillsborough $2.02 $45.47 $0.00 $7.09 $0.00 Bonifa Holmes $587.02 $577.51 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fellsmere Indian River $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.45 Indian River Shores Indian River $0.00 $0.00 $60.62 $0.00 $0.00 Sebastian Indian River $0.00 $207.97 $80.62 $39.76 $0.00 Vero Beach Indian River $27.36 $697.10 $497.55 $123.68 $89.62 105 Appendix A Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alford Jackson $257.81 $1,045.07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Graceville Jackson $0.00 $0.40 $0.00 $27.16 $0.00 Grand Ride Jackson $0.00 $201.25 $0.00 $0.00 $83.63 Marianna Jackson $381.79 $497.96 $44.48 $79.31 $20.23 Sneads Jackson $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,473.77 $0.00 Monticello Jefferson $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $104.73 $0.00 Clermont Lake $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.82 Eustis Lake $0.00 $14.96 $18.48 $0.00 $3.94 Leesburg Lake $26.72 $53.91 $85.06 $60.83 $7.61 Mascotte Lake $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9.38 $0.00 Mount Dora Lake $0.47 $0.00 $53.55 $5.20 $0.00 Tavares Lake $027 $5.72 $13.05 $0.95 $0.00 Bonita Springs Lee $17.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cape Coral Lee $26.13 $65.75 $71.03 $7.21 $7.10 Fort Myers Lee $59.15 $50.88 $95.66 $23.49 $25.69 Fort Myers Beach Lee $98.31 $112.33 $84.23 $57.48 $0.00 Sanibel Lee $295.31 $419.49 $578.34 $3.64 $1.18 Tallahassee Leon $73.51 $91.09 $102.44 $97.29 $78.75 Chiefland Levy $0.00 $25.35 $0.00 $0.00 $9.26 Williston Levy $0.00 $60.72 $121.75 $3.97 $0.00 Yankeetown Levy $0.00 $123.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Lee Madison $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $236.11 Bradenton Manatee $14.89 $9.50 $23.78 $17.51 $21.44 Palmetto Manatee $0.00 $27.55 $0.00 $19.19 $0.00 Longboat Key Manatee /Sarasota $7.59 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Belleview Marion $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13.47 Dunnellon Marion $0.00 $103.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Ocala Marion $93.32 $145.60 $105.03 $53.09 $25.50 Jupiter Island Martin $7,901.38 $2,343.76 $0.00 $0.00 $1,533.35 Stuart Martin $70.13 $80.71 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Aventura Miami-Dade $55.29 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Bay Harbor Islands Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.89 $0.00 Biscayne Park Miami-Dade $264.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Coral Gables Miami-Dade $295.88 $227.45 $33.66 $0.00 $0.00 El Portal Miami-Dade $233.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Florida City Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $54.86 $139.59 $128.80 Golden Beach Miami-Dade $125.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hialeah Miami-Dade $72.34 $59.76 $32.85 $36.93 $33.82 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $30.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Homestead Miami-Dade $198.25 $20.21 $47.14 $64.82 $41.06 Key Biscayne Miami-Dade $0.00 $57.43 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Medley Miami-Dade $906.87 $19.43 $0.00 $0.00 $316.43 Miami Miami-Dade $137.70 $161.68 $92.71 $82.64 $128.60 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0.00 $92.15 $56.56 $70.44 $77.73 North Bay Miami-Dade $84.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 North Miami Miami-Dade $140.32 $34.80 $107.75 $38.31 $35.05 106 Appendix A Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $144.86 $78.61 $35.24 $19.30 $11.95 Opa-locka Miami-Dade $304.51 $1,035.91 $369.65 $376.82 $0.00 Pinecrest Miami-Dade $43.56 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 South Miami Miami-Dade $204.39 $203.49 $59.73 $107.16 $56.63 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $60.42 $112.56 $88.84 $126.39 $76.81 West Miami Miami-Dade $353.45 $1,128.47 $234.63 $111.56 $88.88 Islamorada Monroe $0.00 $275.27 $169.27 $0.00 $0.00 Key West Monroe $418.22 $126.42 $29.28 $168.89 $190.80 Marathon Monroe $394.13 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fernandina Beach Nassau $0.53 $159.68 $109.99 $87.77 $0.00 Crestview Okaloosa $0.00 $4.87 $57.52 $0.00 $157.25 Destin Okaloosa $0.00 $169.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $30.89 $132.05 $114.34 $28.83 $27.92 Ma Esther Okaloosa $186.83 $148.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Niceville Okaloosa $0.19 $27.70 $34.07 $0.00 $0.00 Okeechobee Okeechobee $0.00 $175.08 $103.14 $0.00 $0.00 Apopka Orange $0.00 $0.00 $13.12 $6.14 $0.00 Belle Isle Orange $0.00 $0.00 $385.15 $0.00 $0.00 Maitland Orange $0.00 $49.06 $201.35 $0.23 $0.00 Oakland Orange $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.11 $0.00 Ocoee Orange $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Orlando Orange $64.25 $81.64 $87.92 $55.74 $47.35 Windermere Orange $0.00 $400.41 $391.79 $0.00 $0.00 Winter Garden Orange $0.00 $7.22 $15.07 $2.07 $0.00 Winter Park Orange $31.19 $358.42 $0.00 $4.69 $0.00 Kissimmee Osceola $56.83 $82.64 $119.67 $5.59 $20.92 Saint Cloud Osceola $12.62 $0.00 $93.28 $1.10 $0.47 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0.00 $39.97 $107.39 $12.60 $72.57 Boca Raton Palm Beach $211.80 $28.28 $65.74 $7.47 $9.60 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $75.62 $13.77 $33.82 $13.34 $14.07 Delray Beach Palm Beach $127.98 $33.36 $55.02 $26.94 $19.10 Greenacres Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $14.35 $0.00 $0.00 Highland Beach Palm Beach $26.00 $0.00 $14.47 $0.00 $12.04 Jupiter Palm Beach $27.76 $147.82 $33.51 $12.68 $16.62 Lake Worth Palm Beach $330.84 $67.95 $320.41 $0.00 $0.00 Lantana Palm Beach $68.82 $75.16 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Manala an Palm Beach $0.00 $30.36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 North Palm Beach Palm Beach $51.76 $66.80 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Ocean Ride Palm Beach $135.02 $145.42 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Pahokee Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.36 Palm Beach Palm Beach $721.11 $377.14 $197.27 $0.00 $0.00 Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach $58.94 $25.02 $50.23 $0.00 $0.00 Palm Springs Palm Beach $45.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $0.00 $56.57 $100.85 $49.38 $26.30 Royal Palm Beach Palm Beach $31.63 $0.00 $40.20 $0.00 $0.00 South Bay Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $186.79 Wellington Palm Beach $188.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 107 Appendix A Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 West Palm Beach Palm Beach $141.07 $124.29 $142.14 $92.27 $105.36 Dade City Pasco $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $289.62 $228.50 New Port Richey Pasco $42.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Port Riche Pasco $0.00 $159.29 $0.00 $36.06 $72.14 Ze h rhills Pasco $0.77 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Clearwater Pinellas $34.39 $28.76 $27.64 $20.71 $25.25 Dunedin Pinellas $0.00 $55.86 $13.16 $4.59 $0.00 Largo Pinellas $41.02 $36.33 $23.18 $25.84 $6.48 Madeira Beach Pinellas $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $66.66 $112.41 Oldsmar Pinellas $0.00 $0.00 $21.29 $6.37 $0.00 Pinellas Park Pinellas $2.98 $13.58 $11.47 $9.21 $4.10 Saint Petersburg Pinellas $27.26 $35.32 $32.94 $28.81 $38.88 Tar on Springs Pinellas $0.00 $32.59 $30.57 $11.17 $14.19 Treasure Island Pinellas $11.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Bartow Polk $29.64 $0.00 $142.71 $16.33 $19.58 Dundee Polk $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $402.64 Eagle Lake Polk $212.46 $52.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Meade Polk $0.00 $0.00 $145.84 $0.00 $0.00 Frostproof Polk $0.00 $0.00 $1,197.82 $0.00 $0.00 Haines City Polk $9.17 $18.68 $84.92 $24.64 $6.07 Lake Alfred Polk $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7.27 $0.00 Lakeland Polk $50.04 $61.94 $206.04 $19.65 $34.43 Polk City Polk $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $721.98 Winter Haven Palk $30.35 $46.20 $0.00 $31.83 $26.26 Crescent City Putnam $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3.94 $551.57 Palatka Putnam $132.78 $72.56 $82.70 $0.00 $42.96 Welaka Putnam $157.38 $0.00 $0.00 $67.39 $0.00 Hastings Saint Johns $0.00 $25.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $81.32 $255.42 $453.97 $10.83 $1.95 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $76.40 $97.75 $0.00 $21.35 $9.13 Gulf Breeze Santa Rosa $0.00 $1,004.61 $118.37 $0.00 $0.00 Jay Santa Rosa $48.14 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,305.42 Milton Santa Rosa $98.91 $408.61 $0.00 $0.00 $83.14 Sarasota Sarasota $109.59 $100.27 $99.69 $67.88 $84.64 Venice Sarasota $117.49 $0.00 $42.28 $2.17 $0.00 Altamonte Springs Seminole $0.00 $37.31 $44.51 $0.00 $0.00 Casselber Seminole $0.00 $50.67 $70.26 $13.57 $31.59 Lake Ma Seminole $0.00 $0.00 $143.62 $0.00 $0.00 Longwood Seminole $0.00 $41.80 $87.51 $0.00 $0.00 Oviedo Seminole $0.00 $137.25 $130.71 $14.18 $10.92 Sanford Seminole $12.31 $16.91 $128.52 $33.15 $15.64 Winter Springs Seminole $0.00 $75.71 $160.55 $0.00 $0.00 Bushnell Sumter $0.00 $217.46 $0.00 $1,128.85 $991.48 Coleman Sumter $974.05 $1,027.45 $1,040.49 $1,034.42 $1,045.10 Wildwood Sumter $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3.10 Live Oak Suwannee $15.46 $19.93 $0.00 $0.00 $12.68 Per Taylor $0.00 $1.24 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 108 Appendix A Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Da ona Beach Volusia $49.83 $36.47 $107.17 $49.42 $29.96 Daytona Beach Shores Volusia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12.95 $0.00 DeBa Volusia $0.00 $93.20 $103.19 $0.00 $0.00 Deland Volusia $44.27 $21.34 $112.90 $24.37 $22.95 Deltona Volusia $0.00 $128.56 $68.23 $7.41 $4.80 Edgewater Volusia $0.00 $61.68 $121.08 $0.00 $0.00 Holly Hill Volusia $0.00 $61.13 $154.07 $0.00 $4.56 Lake Helen Volusia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6.55 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $39.78 $80.88 $94.27 $49.01 $32.33 Orange City Volusia $0.00 $46.33 $83.37 $0.00 $0.00 Ormond Beach Volusia $20.94 $45.18 $125.04 $0.00 $9.62 Ponce Inlet Volusia $1.65 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Port Orange Volusia $11.17 $18.40 $131.78 $5.97 $6.80 Sopcho y Wakulla $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $376.80 $0.00 DeFuniak Springs Walton $487.57 $286.39 $23.37 $0.00 $0.00 Freeport Walton $0.00 $0.00 $2,363.24 $973.79 $802.91 Chi le Washington $16.78 $29.77 $30.07 $91.34 $299.62 Statewide Average $112.19 $161.08 $133.95 $86.47 $139.61 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" http://harvester.census.gov/sac/dissem/accessoptions. ht_ml?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 109 This page was intentionally left blank. 110 Appendix B: Adjusted Expenditures 111 Appendix B Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $1,507,305 $1,066,620 $985,207 $1,322,981 $1,096,658 Baker $382,848 $13,003 $13,991 $0 $56,294 Bay $204,725 $109,454 $146,520 $153,673 $955,148 Bradford $0 $3,692 $0 $0 $0 Brevard $10,136,755 $7,733,902 $13,218,870 $8,738,154 $6,540,767 Broward $54,109,754 $57,329,637 $53,391,209 $59,574,595 $56,080,018 Calhoun $2,987,927 $2,240,515 $718,872 $264,775 $377,700 Charlotte $750,675 $3,594,496 $798,358 $537,573 $474,999 Citrus $2,398,229 $1,428,730 $874,330 $1,492,458 $994,972 Clay $965,451 $164,638 $341,123 $2,064,390 $1,286,545 Collier $7,521,436 $6,368,754 $5,382,589 $6,796,338 $5,430,257 Columbia $0 $0 $0 $53,366 $446,429 Desoto $8,406,240 $0 $492,290 $531,797 $122,491 Dixie $237,060 $243,891 $185,908 $238,763 $189,110 Escambia $12,492,712 $7,243,724 $9,775,968 $8,090,837 $8,216,477 Fla ler $593,430 $351,906 $1,268,342 $652,593 $122,651 Franklin $0 $154,578 $55,796 $9,631 $0 Gadsden $647,429 $126,483 $119,978 $199,058 $209,202 Gilchrist $400,737 $29,040 $0 $0 $9,955 Glades $216,026 $86,043 $589,373 $0 $0 Gulf $631,642 $0 $0 $16,591 $11,014 Hamilton $79,489 $144,000 $8,000 $70,866 $632,584 Hardee $1,473,047 $658,510 $103,721 $496,266 $115,923 Hernando $2,396,229 $1,493,704 $923,325 $1,578,460 $386,297 Highlands $210,728 $425,802 $193,595 $162,676 $230,446 Hillsborough $40,837,566 $44,920,829 $41,658,220 $43,313,759 $41,259,166 Holmes $68,417 $122,180 $193,130 $65,348 $149,927 Indian River $1,513,265 $1,601,786 $957,893 $1,157,234 $1,017,880 Jackson $106,808 $973,392 $168,734 $541,865 $426,950 Jefferson $151,864 $440,946 $0 $62,579 $0 Lake $2,523,037 $1,349,383 $1,378,377 $1,358,923 $1,947,249 Lee $24,417,616 $15,663,107 $28,069,515 $29,585,680 $16,167,126 Leon $737,820 $384,359 $751,344 $791,895 $970,004 Lev $418,603 $185,190 $87,876 $86,414 $163,316 Liberty $123,028 $518,467 $271,454 $52,668 $384,000 Madison $1,230,667 $0 $0 $0 $0 Manatee $6,610,459 $14,017,919 $9,203,559 $3,177,216 $4,888,351 Marion $4,040,818 $2,249,317 $2,629,725 $1,838,749 $778,019 Martin $4,574,264 $963,345 $1,187,134 $1,617,377 $1,445,664 Miami-Dade $143,642,693 $127,021,905 $140,348,549 $164,523,989 $233,064,278 Monroe $7,624,620 $6,783,416 $3,796,120 $21,036,215 $3,414,135 Nassau $896,056 $336,534 $210,160 $0 $26,497 Okaloosa $3,303,202 $3,882,903 $20,551,021 $3,898,190 $2,124,944 Okeechobee $0 $405,307 $51,002 $230,626 $412,240 Oran a $38,876,893 $31,416,869 $33,835,498 $32,617,759 $39,104,966 Osceola $1,888,579 $814,345 $857,936 $789,180 $1,522,209 Palm Beach $58,249,536 $55,641,937 $60,526,884 $55,789,272 $51,855,594 112 Appendix B Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Pasco $7,322,170 $8,228,453 $5,962,191 $8,021,817 $7,654,672 Pinellas $28,856,582 $20,399,954 $15,468,607 $22,170,804 $15,881,598 Polk $12,711,444 $12,575,858 $12,949,767 $12,260,153 $10,462,681 Putnam $424,741 $927,230 $277,474 $266,156 $291,504 Saint Johns $3,775,953 $3,422,381 $1,129,197 $692,701 $470,672 Saint Lucie $3,922,531 $5,378,513 $1,263,484 $1,982,198 $2,505,359 Santa Rosa $1,618,108 $824,324 $1,014,159 $860,640 $614,309 Sarasota $4,264,618 $8,753,813 $7,153,732 $5,450,426 $5,290,804 Seminole $5,389,594 $8,103,836 $6,111,982 $7,334,012 $4,253,384 Sumter $776,803 $600,822 $446,993 $143,088 $271,844 Suwannee $155,976 $279,451 $285,961 $141,917 $227,826 Taylor $0 $523,218 $0 $0 $0 Union $0 $0 $36,135 $0 $60,955 Volusia $22,116,082 $15,497,468 $15,020,440 $19,667,989 $23,291,342 Wakulla $0 $157,092 $114,765 $270,485 $371,216 Walton $234,324 $201,812 $122,347 $23,544 $0 Washington $44,801 $65,973 $3,060 $30,803 $19,645 Statewide Total $542,199,412 $486,644,756 $503,681,790 $534,897,512 1 $556,776,263 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt`.//harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records 113 Appendix B Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 CountT_ 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $6.18 $4.43 $4.17 $5.72 $4.80 Baker $15.31 $0.54 $0.58 $0.00 $2.45 Bay $1.24 $0.68 $0.92 $7.91 $6.28 Bradford $0.00 $0.13 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Brevard $18.67 $14.54 $25.35 $17.21 $13.24 Broward $30.86 $32.93 $30.98 $35.08 $33.60 Calhoun $211.71 $160.67 $52.82 $19.70 $28.55 Charlotte $4.68 $23.34 $5.09 $3.54 $3.20 Citrus $17.54 $10.77 $6.77 $11.86 $8.09 Clay $5.46 $0.97 $2.09 $13.23 $8.58 Collier $23.03 $20.04 $17.58 $23.24 $19.57 Columbia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.91 $7.65 DeSoto $253.47 $0.00 $14.43 $15.77 $3.73 Dixie $15.12 $15.86 $12.45 $16.26 $13.08 Escambia $40.35 $23.86 $31.82 $26.68 $27.44 Fla ler $6.66 $4.48 $18.20 $10.60 $2.16 Franklin $0.00 $14.25 $524 $0.92 $0.00 Gadsden $13.43 $2.65 $2.56 $4.28 $4.56 Gilchrist $23.99 $1.79 $0.00 $0.00 $0.66 Glades $20.01 $8.02 $54.91 $0.00 $0.00 Gulf $38.26 $0.00 $0.00 $1.06 $0.72 Hamilton $5.48 $10.06 $0.56 $5.05 $45.43 Hardee $54.18 $24.09 $3.73 $18.11 $4.23 Hernando $15.26 $9.91 $6.36 $11.22 $2.83 Highlands $2.18 $4.56 $2.10 $1.80 $2.59 Hillsborough $35.07 $39.70 $37.58 $40.12 $39.09 Holmes $3.51 $6.38 $10.16 $3.45 $8.01 Indian River $11.19 $12.32 $7.55 $9.55 $8.62 Jackson $2.13 $19.59 $3.45 $11.06 $8.95 Jefferson $10.58 $30.98 $0.00 $4.62 $0.00 Lake $9.12 $5.13 $5.47 $5.65 $8.43 Lee $41.70 $28.51 $53.85 $59.76 $34.03 Leon $2.71 $1.42 $2.85 $3.10 $3.91 Lev $10.74 $4.88 $2.34 $2.36 $4.53 Liberty $15.83 $68.39 $36.91 $7.29 $53.65 Madison $62.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Manatee $21.44 $46.06 $31.17 $11.07 $17.62 Marion $12.82 $7.38 $8.97 $6.52 $2.87 Martin $32.07 $6.83 $8.63 $12.03 $11.03 Miami-Dade $58.94 $52.44 $58.97 $70.13 $100.79 Monroe $94.70 $82.31 $46.73 $261.20 $42.08 Nassau $13.14 $5.12 $3.23 $0.00 $0.43 Okaloosa $17.14 $20.55 $110.62 $21.52 $12.01 Okeechobee $0.00 $10.73 $1.34 $6.19 $11.28 Orange $36.01 $30.11 $33.37 $33.18 $40.91 Osceola $7.38 $3.46 $3.80 $3.75 $7.87 Palm Beach $45.23 $43.95 $48.72 $46.05 $43.83 114 Appendix B Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Pasco $17.25 $20.22 $15.30 $21.37 $21.18 Pinellas $30.44 $21.52 $16.39 $23.59 $17.00 Palk $22.50 $23.21 $24.51 $23.95 $20.83 Putnam $5.71 $12.57 $3.79 $3.70 $4.09 Saint Johns $22.84 $21.76 $7.56 $4.95 $3.51 Saint Lucie $15.13 $22.41 $5.59 $9.35 $12.32 Santa Rosa $11.44 $6.04 $7.58 $6.68 $4.92 Sarasota $11.24 $23.80 $19.97 $15.63 $15.58 Seminole $12.81 $19.68 $15.15 $18.57 $10.97 Sumter $9.40 $8.11 $6.73 $2.27 $4.43 Suwannee $4.02 $7.32 $7.58 $3.82 $6.38 Taylor $0.00 $24.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Union $0.00 $0.00 $2.47 $0.00 $4.42 Volusia $43.89 $31.33 $31.02 $41.78 $50.66 Wakulla $0.00 $5.85 $4.50 $10.85 $15.33 Walton $4.20 $3.77 $2.42 $0.50 $0.00 Washington $1.94 $2.86 $0.14 $1.41 $0.91 Statewide Average $24.68 $19.50 $17.28 $18.41 $15.45 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 115 Appendix B Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Munici ality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua Alachua $411,613 $4,264 $19,540 $3,221 $0 Archer Alachua $0 $361 $0 $0 $0 Gainesville Alachua $8,470,345 $7,791,259 $5,805,581 $6,270,845 $5,767,563 Hawthorne Alachua $0 $0 $788,000 $0 $0 High Springs Alachua $0 $0 $3,886,583 $430,256 $0 Macclenn Baker $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cedar Grove Bay $501,824 $3,709,000 $835,144 $2,470,631 $0 Lynn Haven Bay $0 $0 $0 $439,325 $300,796 Mexico Beach Bay $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Panama City Bay $1,082,531 $1,076,252 $867,425 $884,094 $572,194 Panama City Beach Bay $0 $63,896 $11,261 $13,916 $51,769 Springfield Bay $0 $4,233 $68,641 $17,538 $14,236 Hampton Bradford $0 $0 $0 $5,005 $0 Lawte Bradford $0 $1,249,594 $0 $0 $0 Starke Bradford $36,511 $152,761 $0 $0 $0 Cocoa Brevard $1,101,577 $402,568 $726,467 $619,693 $543,744 Cocoa Beach Brevard $0 $47,638 $150,000 $0 $0 Malabar Brevard $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Melbourne Brevard $3,384,997 $3,063,104 $3,840,020 $2,780,846 $4,486,435 Palm Bay Brevard $1,587,440 $1,311,433 $1,325,561 $1,281,000 $1,023,713 Rockledge Brevard $0 $113,460 $0 $0 $50,385 Satellite Beach Brevard $110,843 $0 $0 $3,798 $0 Titusville Brevard $607,222 $819,005 $769,706 $493,464 $757,946 Cooper City Broward $0 $0 $0 $0 $273,689 Coral Springs Broward $683,220 $1,439,859 $982,919 $516,267 $755,790 Dania Beach Broward $38,099 $428,462 $217,633 $318,243 $398,062 Davie Broward $0 $826,083 $1,213,361 $697,546 $1,128,413 Deerfield Beach Broward $503,960 $1,302,232 $678,825 $446,804 $591,105 Fort Lauderdale Broward $11,911,568 $14,736,259 $16,394,552 $14,164,076 $16,106,650 Hallandale Beach Broward $209,547 $902,560 $456,808 $230,875 $650,149 Hollywood Broward $5,434,315 $3,974,003 $4,216,879 $3,609,539 $4,473,017 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $262,816 $0 $0 $0 $0 Lauderhill Broward $1,001,237 $0 $1,124,169 $0 $0 Margate Broward $1,599,858 $837,906 $474,652 $619,073 $657,460 Miramar Broward $933,955 $1,151,212 $1,014,038 $832,032 $851,382 North Lauderdale Broward $692,420 $362,189 $627,940 $370,472 $355,748 Oakland Park Broward $381,568 $763,200 $915,525 $420,326 $0 Parkland Broward $0 $0 $26,997 $0 $0 Pembroke Park Broward $0 $0 $0 $0 $308,700 Pembroke Pines Broward $1,050,549 $1,226,060 $1,420,422 $925,201 $1,028,584 Plantation Broward $1,774,542 $933,762 $394,196 $326,348 $504,431 Pompano Beach Broward $2,082,450 $1,380,697 $1,855,742 $2,589,782 $2,801,796 Southwest Ranches Broward $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sunrise Broward $970,330 $1,252,374 $1,218,012 $1,192,917 $941,883 Tamarac Broward $830,173 $245,554 $515,439 $796,966 $674,752 Weston Broward $200,000 $0 $11,364 $0 $0 Wilton Manors Broward $0 $0 $128,103 $0 $0 116 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix B Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Altha Calhoun $0 $0 $0 $60,681 $0 Blountstown Calhoun $78,150 $40,691 $0 $48,288 $0 Punta Gorda Charlotte $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Crystal River Citrus $0 $8,288 $10,537 $0 $37,105 Green Cove 5 rin s Clay $9,260 $0 $7,710 $10,094 $11,688 Everglades Collier $77,422 $0 $0 $0 $1,133,877 Marco Island Collier $196,186 $0 $149,227 $0 $0 Naples Collier $247,537 $167,485 $46,196 $485,292 $0 Lake City Columbia $0 $0 $565,358 $589,713 $0 Arcadia De Soto $0 $6,410 $0 $170,867 $0 Cross City Dixie $0 $49,592 $2,570 $27,327 $1,676 Atlantic Beach Duval $0 $0 $0 $195,460 $0 Baldwin Duval $0 $59,399 $38,400 $0 $0 Jacksonville Duval $29,519,849 $26,847,128 $33,526,353 $32,845,766 $29,036,614 Jacksonville Beach Duval $0 $0 $446,358 $404,392 $414,214 Neptune Beach Duval $0 $0 $0 $113,302 $0 Pensacola Escambia $12,765,285 $3,620,959 $4,540,947 $4,642,403 $3,594,569 Bunnell Fla ler $522,151 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fla ler Beach FlaglerNolusia $4,886 $0 $0 $0 $0 Apalachicola Franklin $0 $0 $665,228 $3,881,040 $0 Carrabelle Franklin $0 $0 $0 $46,814 $1,147,800 Chattahoochee Gadsden $0 $1,759,735 $0 $0 $0 Greensboro Gadsden $0 $0 $0 $21,040 $0 Havana Gadsden $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,812 Quincy Gadsden $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,740 Fannin Springs Gilchrist/Lev $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,800 Port Saint Joe Gulf $0 $0 $0 $64,193 $0 White Springs Hamilton $0 $6,641 $0 $35,683 $2,041,428 Bowling Green Hardee $0 $0 $0 $2,991 $0 Wauchula Hardee $103,959 $379,096 $2,843,489 $784,106 $0 Zolfo Springs Hardee $0 $0 $44,825 $0 $0 Brooksville Hernando $0 - $0 $76,496 $144,500 $96,681 Avon Park Highlands $0 $292,882 $169,534 $90,364 $1,301,145 Lake Placid Highlands $3,771 $0 $6,282 $5,982 $0 Sebring Highlands $410,189 $807,602 $128,595 $101,090 $289,372 Plant City Hillsborough $416,344 $739,245 $0 $1,015,280 $1,044,416 Tampa Hillsborough $15,245,191 $18,444,877 $19,043,372 $24,337,374 $18,412,843 Temple Terrace Hillsborough $10,000 $12,116 $0 $155,107 $0 Bonifa Holmes $1,574,664 $1,498,803 $0 $0 $0 Fellsmere Indian River $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800 Indian River Shores Indian River $0 $0 $865 $0 $0 Sebastian Indian River $0 $1,750,396 $760,626 $726,669 $0 Vero Beach Indian River $9,258 $849,485 $3,114,308 $2,219,431 $1,605,880 Alford Jackson $112,500 $509,993 $0 $0 $0 Graceville Jackson $0 $1,000 $0 $66,546 $0 Grand Ride Jackson $0 $167,397 $0 $0 $20,250 Marianna Jackson $2,505,291 $3,231,288 $286,649 $506,251 $126,989 117 Appendix B Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Coun 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Sneads Jackson $0 $0 $0 $2,885,643 $0 Monticello Jefferson $0 $0 $0 $265,292 $0 Clermont Lake $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,261 Eustis Lake $0 $133,654 $41,459 $0 $61,252 Lad Lake Lake $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Leesburg Lake $503,397 $506,148 $105,414 $990,884 $122,626 Mascotte Lake $0 $0 $0 $32,534 $0 Mount Dora Lake $5,195 $0 $218,087 $55,085 $0 Tavares Lake $3,438 $2,369 $6,464 $10,145 $0 Bonita Springs Lee $315,567 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cape Coral Lee $1,833,758 $2,266,711 $914,800 $867,814 $803,560 Fort Myers Lee $1,610,339 $2,087,661 $1,874,023 $1,233,763 $1,318,437 Fort Myers Beach Lee $155,941 $664,866 $423,386 $390,389 $0 Sanibel Lee $245,981 $824,337 $343,022 $22,650 $7,250 Tallahassee Leon $12,835,845 $14,451,260 $13,213,576 $14,304,322 $11,523,459 Chiefland Lev $0 $25,770 $0 $0 $18,633 Williston Lev $0 $147,496 $158,571 $9,149 $0 Yankeetown Lev $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Lee Madison $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 Bradenton Manatee $817,659 $515,670 $826,283 $913,564 $1,071,066 Palmetto Manatee $0 $350,000 $0 $248,338 $0 Belleview Marion $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,391 Dunnellon Marion $0 $78,185 $0 $0 $0 Ocala Marion $4,819,344 $3,234,403 $2,364,979 $2,502,649 $1,184,699 Jupiter Island Martin $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 Stuart Martin $25,650 $35,544 $0 $0 $0 Aventura Miami-Dade $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bay Harbor Islands Miami-Dade $0 $0 $0 $4,606 $0 Coral Gables Miami-Dade $150,000 $18,566 $136,868 $0 $0 Florida City Miami-Dade $0 $0 $456,379 $1,181,760 $1,046,986 Hialeah Miami-Dade $7,574,509 $12,135,710 $7,673,103 $8,619,773 $7,821,996 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Homestead Miami-Dade $1,453,064 $173,291 $1,720,773 $2,267,875 $1,347,348 Key Biscayne Miami-Dade $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Medley Miami-Dade $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Miami Miami-Dade $31,486,200 $56,524,387 $34,125,361 $30,818,447 $47,130,713 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0 $7,088,338 $4,643,649 $6,374,187 $6,915,503 North Miami Miami-Dade $2,975,441 $1,137,665 $1,956,593 $2,044,642 $2,102,768 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $1,376,954 $2,673,487 $947,342 $813,856 $503,873 O a-locka Miami-Dade $114,607 $200,565 $167,890 $338,212 $0 South Miami Miami-Dade $408,696 $471,886 $650,470 $1,153,944 $609,249 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $63,633 $0 $23,933 $74,486 $205,913 West Miami Miami-Dade $0 $1,868 $139,807 $67,952 $104,984 Islamorada Monroe $0 $0 $116,205 $0 $0 Key West Monroe $2,412,883 $1,683,542 $701,444 $2,587,076 $905,136 Marathon Monroe $123,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fernandina Beach Nassau $6,267 $1,855,645 $692,167 $997,104 $0 118 1 11 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 A rI L 1 Appendix B Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 - Crestview Okaloosa $0 $72,452 $0 $0 $2,432,011 Destin Okaloosa $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $433,383 $374,885 $403,685 $339,833 $230,058 Ma Esther Okaloosa $0 $77,696 $0 $0 $0 Niceville Okaloosa $2,515 $0 $0 $0 $0 Okeechobee Okeechobee $0 $657,836 $556,687 $0 $0 Apopka Orange $0 $0 $189,513 $192,666 $0 Belle Isle Orange. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maitland Orange $0 $62,965 $25,000 $3,560 $0 Oakland Orange $0 $0 $0 $1,824 $0 Ocoee Orange $0 $0 $0 $0 $861,870 Orlando Orange $11,409,388 $6,816,411 $7,224,598 $11,251,496 $9,230,003 Windermere Orange $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Winter Garden Orange $0 $129,789 $17,867 $39,311 $0 Winter Park Orange $53,031 $303,639 $0 $123,707 $0 Kissimmee Osceola $2,603,101 $2,356,867 $1,290,092 $294,630 $1,066,493 Saint Cloud Osceola $359,641 $0 $136,215 $25,880 $10,150 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0 $259,181 $350,909 $187,625 $1,079,093 Boca Raton Palm Beach $1,087,346 $2,412,468 $637,378 $567,980 $725,588 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $988,869 $508,832 $844,772 $861,550 $884,089 Delray Beach Palm Beach $954,798 $1,058,510 $751,467 $1,685,701 $1,175,339 Greenacres Palm Beach $0 $0 $176,833 $0 $0 Highland Beach Palm Beach $0 $0 $10,622 $0 $47,690 Ju iter Palm Beach $38,004 $380,748 $70,277 $141,779 $421,149 Lake Worth Palm Beach $141,438 $36,775 $234,843 $0 $0 Lantana Palm Beach $9,124 $2,860 $0 $0 $0 Manala an Palm Beach $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 North Palm Beach Palm Beach $4,993 $838,504 $0 $0 $0 Ocean Ride Palm Beach $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pahokee Palm Beach $0 $0 $0 $0 $69,022 Palm Beach Palm Beach $4,519 $90,594 $65,815 $0 $0 Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach $85,914 $391,780 $262,203 .$71,480 $0 Palm Springs Palm Beach $50,409 $0 $0 $0 $0 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $0 $601,702 $1,826,086 $1,541,802 $815,507 Royal Palm Beach Palm Beach $122,849 $0 $250,007 $0 $0 South Bay Palm Beach $0 $0 $0 $0 $734,832 West Palm Beach Palm Beach $8,135,551 $8,184,616 $7,841,425 $8,364,175 $9,081,348 Dade City Pasco $0 $0 $0 $1,875,561 $1,460,806 New Port Riche Pasco $702,512 $0 $0 $0 $0 Port Riche Pasco $0 $507,669 $0 $113,188 $221,968 Ze h rhills Pasco $9,659 $0 $0 $0 $0 Clearwater Pinellas $3,803,288 $2,376,673 $1,910,728 $2,279,782 $2,769,967 Dunedin Pinellas $0 $1,646,314 $52,538 $170,270 $0 Largo Pinellas $3,111,478 $1,646,063 $1,237,806 $1,854,393 $455,129 Madeira Beach Pinellas $0 $0 $0 $296,192 $437,463 Oldsmar Pinellas $0 $0 $235,430 $86,067 $0 Pinellas Park Pinellas $145,468 $486,153 $545,824 $429,662 $190,854 119 Appendix B Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipali Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Saint Petersburg Pinellas $6,930,094 $7,909,962 $6,999,845 $7,210,990 $9,699,916 Tarpon Springs Pinellas $0 $296,318 $302,142 $254,941 $316,695 Treasure Island Pinellas $86,470 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bartow Palk $479,633 $0 $552,697 $252,943 $301,172 Dundee Polk $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,182,946 Eagle Lake Polk $564,941 $18,489 $0 $0 $0 Fort Meade Polk $0 $0 $86,561 $0 $0 Frostproof Polk $0 $0 $3,265,709 $0 $0 Haines City Polk $164,897 $32,958 $849,059 $347,804 $83,628 Lake Alfred Polk $0 $0 $0 $28,951 $0 Lakeland Polk $4,313,729 $2,769,066 $2,265,030 $1,744,158 $2,944,772 Polk City Polk $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,126,292 Winter Haven Polk $945,612 $475,884 $0 $855,048 $698,533 Crescent City Putnam $0 $0 $0 $7,145 $984,558 Palatka Putnam $1,464,960 $627,071 $648,089 $0 $435,551 Welaka Putnam $98,206 $0 $0 $0 $0 Hastings Saint Johns $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $1,815,720 $483,995 $803,965 $419,639 $71,490 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $6,123,920 $2,726,212 $0 $2,200,744 $869,075 Gulf Breeze Santa Rosa $0 $17,504 $46,987 $0 $0 Jay Santa Rosa $26,670 $0 $0 $0 $753,229 Milton Santa Rosa $555,708 $94,184 $0 $0 $601,151 Sarasota Sarasota $5,354,662 $5,281,281 $5,108,729 $3,687,865 $3,732,748 Venice Sarasota $2,145,165 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 Altamonte S rin s Seminole $0 $12,093 $47,233 $0 $0 Casselber Seminole $0 $587,798 $26,746 $331,605 $761,721 Lake Ma Seminole $0 $0 $8,196 $0 $0 Longwood Seminole $0 $33,130 $0 $0 $0 Oviedo Seminole $0 $466,400 $365,929 $411,412 $305,795 Sanford Seminole $630,466 $832,755 $1,146,412 $1,476,864 $676,436 Winter Springs Seminole $0 $694,325 $350,060 $0 $0 Bushnell Sumter $0 $399,795 $0 $2,392,043 $2,049,390 Coleman Sumter $638,000 $647,100 $655,800 $664,100 $672,000 Wildwood Sumter $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,238 Live Oak Suwannee $102,572 $26,564 $0 $0 $82,395 Per Taylor $0 $8,471 $0 $0 $0 Daytona Beach Volusia $2,009,171 $1,950,619 $2,674,695 $3,206,676 $1,945,994 Daytona Beach Shores Volusia $0 $0 $0 $58,448 $0 DeBa Volusia $0 $106,368 $0 $0 $0 DeLand Volusia $1,139,101 $534,669 $614,937 $558,088 $512,149 Deltona Volusia $0 $443,515 $349,417 $565,441 $354,305 Edgewater Volusia $0 $130,647 $0 $0 $0 Holly Hill Volusia $0 $114,800 $521,578 $0 $56,963 Lake Helen Volusia $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,235 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $909,506 $304,205 $254,472 $1,009,447 $658,016 .Orange City Volusia $0 $65,557 $153,199 $0 $0 Ormond Beach Volusia $843,246 $778,618 $310,876 $0 $361,818 120 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 Appendix B Reported Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Ponce Inlet Volusia $5,383 $0 $0 $0 $0 Port Orange Volusia $626,012 $485,752 $208,541 $304,518 $298,007 Sopchoppy Wakulla $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 DeFuniak Spring s Walton $2,626,519 $1,384,309 $121,711 $0 $0 Freeport Walton $0 $0 $2,916,243 $1,178,289 $969,910 Chiple Washington $61,285 $35,901 $7,420 $212,058 $1,059,170 Palm Coast Fla ler $49,113 $0 $0 $0 $0 Statewide Total $257,964,3110 $285,170,0691 $253,358,376 $261,823,617 $260,409,921 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt ://harvester.gansus. gvdsac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records 121 Appendix B Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua Alachua $53.76 $0.58 $2.74 $0.48 $0.00 Archer Alachua $0.00 $0.29 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Gainesville Alachua $70.05 $64.99 $49.30 $53.51 $58.71 Hawthorne Alachua $0.00 $0.00 $576.44 $0.00 $0.00 High Springs Alachua $0.00 $0.00 $897.59 $102.30 $0.00 Macclenn Baker $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cedar Grove Bay $79.34 $602.50 $141.98 $438.99 $0.00 Lynn Haven Bay $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $31.16 $22.78 Mexico Beach Bay $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Panama City Bay $28.84 $28.90 $23.31 $24.19 $15.71 Panama City Beach Bay $0.00 $7.12 $1.35 $1.76 $6.56 Springfield Ba $0.00 $0.47 $7.69 $1.98 $1.60 Hampton Bradford $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.83 $0.00 Lawte Bradford $0.00 $1,811.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Starke Bradford $6.03 $26.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cocoa Brevard $63.33 $22.87 $43.74 $37.89 $33.29 Cocoa Beach Brevard $0.00 $3.70 $11.67 $0.00 $0.00 Malabar Brevard $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Melbourne Brevard $44.11 $40.81 $51.44 $37.78 $61.62 Palm Bay Brevard $16.42 $14.27 $14.97 $15.07 $12.39 Rockledge Brevard $0.00 $4.61 $0.00 $0.00 $2.35 Satellite Beach Brevard $10.13 $0.00 $0.00 $0.39 $0.00 Titusville Brevard $13.79 $18.72 $17.89 $11.69 $18.42 Cooper City Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9.62 Coral Springs Broward $5.27 $11.35 $7.76 $4.16 $6.16 Dania Beach Broward $1.33 $14.96 $7.75 $11.67 $14.65 Davie Broward $0.00 $9.87 $14.83 $8.75 $14.34 Deerfield Beach Broward $6.67 $17.33 $10.43 $6.90 $9.12 Fort Lauderdale Broward $67.74 $86.00 $96.27 $83.73 $103.73 Hallandale Beach Broward $5.85 $25.27 $12.97 $6.61 $18.98 Hollywood Broward $37.93 $27.79 $29.49 $25.31 $31.70 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $8.17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Lauderhill Broward $15.86 $0.00 $19.40 $0.00 $0.00 Margate Broward $28.91 $15.24 $8.72 $11.45 $12.18 Miramar Broward $8.47 $10.62 $9.96 $8.67 $9.73 North Lauderdale Broward $16.65 $8.85 $15.59 $11.08 $10.72 Oakland Park Broward $8.99 $24.00 $28.78 $13.24 $0.00 Parkland Broward $0.00 $0.00 $1.39 $0.00 $0.00 Pembroke Park Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $46.91 Pembroke Pines Broward $6.92 $8.12 $9.44 $6.24 $7.10 Plantation Broward $20.90 $10.97 $4.66 $3.89 $6.03 Pompano Beach Broward $20.60 $13.57 $21.29 $30.00 $32.47 Southwest Ranches Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Sunrise Broward $10.82 $13.96 $13.69 $13.64 $10.83 Tamarac Broward $14.01 $4.18 $8.93 $14.01 $11.95 Weston Broward $3.25 $0.00 $0.19 $0.00 $0.00 Wilton Manors Broward $0.00 $0.00 $10.43 $0.00 $020 122 Appendix B Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years End In September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Altha Calhoun $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $109.34 $0.00 Blountstown Calhoun $31.56 $16.58 $0.00 $20.00 $0.00 Punta Gorda Charlotte $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Crystal River Citrus $0.00 $2.23 $2.86 $0.00 $10.59 Green Cove Springs Clay $1.45 $0.00 $1.29 $1.77 $2.11 Everglades Collier $146.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,232.04 Marco Island Collier $12.48 $0.00 $9.58 $0.00 $0.00 Naples Collier $10.78 $7.45 $2.06 $21.72 $0.00 Lake City Columbia $0.00 $0.00 $53.05 $55.37 $0.00 Arcadia De Soto $0.00 $0.96 $0.00 $24.91 $0.00 Cross City Dixie $0.00 $27.97 $1.43 $15.06 $0.91 Atlantic Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14.05 $0.00 Baldwin Duval $0.00 $36.31 $23.40 $0.00 $0.00 Jacksonville Duval $35.36 $32.87 $42.12 $41.98 $37.92 Jacksonville Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $20.72 $19.12 $19.67 Neptune Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15.70 $0.00 Pensacola Escambia $231.96 $66.04 $80.56 $82.45 $63.88 Bunnell Fla ler $207.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Palm Coast Fla ler $1.28 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fla ler Beach Fla IerNolusia $0.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Apalachicola Franklin $0.00 $0.00 $275.80 $1,625.91 $0.00 Carrabelle Franklin $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $35.93 $896.02 Chattahoochee Gadsden $0.00 $451.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Greensboro Gadsden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $33.13 $0.00 Havana Gadsden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6.88 Quincy Gadsden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7.29 Fannin Springs Gilchrist/Lev $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.21 Port Saint Joe Gulf $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17.67 $0.00 White Springs Hamilton $0.00 $8.60 $0.00 $45.11 $2,558.18 Bowling Green Hardee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.99 $0.00 Wauchula Hardee $23.34 $92.19 $645.51 $181.21 $0.00 Zolfo Springs Hardee $0.00 $0.00 $26.97 $0.00 $0.00 Brooksville Hernando $0.00 $0.00 $10.51 $19.80 $13.32 Avon Park Highlands $0.00 $33.36 $19.33 $10.51 $151.90 Lake Placid Highlands $2.14 $0.00 $3.66 $3.55 $0.00 Sebring Hi hlands $40.14 $79.68 $12.81 $10.26 $29.57 Plant City Hillsborough $12.68 $22.81 $0.00 $31.89 $32.93 Tama Hillsborough $46.07 $56.49 $58.84 $76.47 $59.04 Temple Terrace Hillsborough $0.43 $0.55 $0.00 $7.09 $0.00 Bonifa Holmes $576.38 $550.02 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fellsmere Indian River $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.45 Indian River Shores Indian River $0.00 $0.00 $0.24 $0.00 $0.00 Sebastian Indian River $0.00 $87.31 $39.28 $39.76 $0.00 Vero Beach Indian River $0.51 $47.47 $172.90 $123.68 $89.62 Alford Jackson $228.66 $1,045.07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Graceville Jackson $0.00 $0.40 $0.00 $27.16 $0.00 Grand Ride Jackson $0.00 $183.95 $0.00 $0.00 $23.30 123 Appendix B Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Marianna Jackson $381.79 $497.96 $44.48 $79.31 $20.23 Sneads Jackson $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,473.77 $0.00 Monticello Jefferson $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $104.73 $0.00 Clermont Lake $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.82 Eustis Lake $0.00 $7.75 $2.46 $0.00 $3.94 Lad Lake Lake $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Leesburg Lake $26.72 $28.98 $6.32 $60.83 $7.61 Mascotte Lake $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9.38 $0.00 Mount Dora Lake $0.47 $0.00 $20.27 $5.20 $0.00 Tavares Lake $0.27 $0.21 $0.59 $0.95 $0.00 Bonita S rin s Lee $7.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cape Coral Lee $11.87 $16.17 $6.91 $7.21 $7.10 Fort Myers Lee $24.50 $33.99 $32.54 $23.49 $25.69 Fort Myers Beach Lee $22.69 $97.07 $60.96 $57.48 $0.00 Sanibel Lee $38.91 $131.43 $54.15 $3.64 $1.18 Tallahassee Leon $72.79 $82.68 $78.12 $88.13 $73.54 Chiefland Lev $0.00 $12.23 $0.00 $0.00 $9.26 Williston Lev $0.00 $60.72 $68.14 $3.97 $0.00 Yankeetown Lev $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Lee Madison $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $236.11 Bradenton Manatee $14.89 $9.50 $15.71 $17.51 $21.44 Palmetto Manatee $0.00 $26.37 $0.00 $19.19 $0.00 Belleview Marion $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13.47 Dunnellon Marion $0.00 $39.69 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Ocala Marion $92.94 $65.42 $49.92 $53.09 $25.50 Jupiter Island Martin $1.59 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.61 Stuart Martin $1.54 $2.15 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Aventura Miami-Dade $0.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Bay Harbor Islands Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.89 $0.00 Coral Gables Miami-Dade $3.38 $0.42 $3.09 $0.00 $0.00 Florida City Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $52.37 $139.59 $128.80 Hialeah Miami-Dade $33.17 $52.67 $32.85 $36.93 $33.82 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Homestead Miami-Dade $33.66 $4.51 $47.14 $64.82 $41.06 Key Biscayne Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Medley Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Miami Miami-Dade $80.45 $146.10 $89.91 $82.64 $128.60 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0.00 $75.78 $50.73 $70.44 $77.73 North Miami Miami-Dade $49.81 $18.86 $32.56 $34.04 $35.05 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $33.84 $65.00 $22.36 $19.30 $11.95 O a-locka Miami-Dade $7.40 $12.99 $10.42 $21.69 $0.00 South Miami Miami-Dade $38.82 $44.61 $59.73 $107.16 $56.63 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $4.46 $0.00 $1.68 $5.22 $14.44 West Miami Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.32 $22.80 $11.03 $17.56 Islamorada Monroe $0.00 $0.00 $16.62 $0.00 $0.00 Ke West Monroe $95.30 $63.45 $26.76 $100.23 $35.01 Marathon Monroe $11.65 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 124 Appendix B Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Fernandina Beach Nassau $0.53 $159.68 $59.97 $87.77 $0.00 Crestview Okaloosa $0.00 $3.94 $0.00 $0.00 $157.25 Destin Okaloosa $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $20.75 $18.08 $19.58 $16.57 $11.37 Mary Esther Okaloosa $0.00 $18.47 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Niceville Okaloosa $0.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0100 $0.00 Okeechobee Okeechobee $0.00 $120.86 $101.99 $0.00 $0.00 Apopka Orange $0.00 $0.00 $5.75 $6.14 $0.00 Belle Isle Orange $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Maitland Oran a $0.00 $3.97 $1.52 $0.23 $0.00 Oakland Orange $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.11 $0.00 Ocoee Orange $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Orlando Orange $50.92 $31.33 $34.58 $55.74 $47.35 Windermere Orange $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Winter Garden Orange $0.00 $5.27 $0.80 $1.93 $0.00 Winter Park Oran a $1.85 $10.90 $0.00 $4.69 $0.00 Kissimmee Osceola $43.21 $40.48 $23.10 $5.59 $20.92 Saint Cloud Osceola $11.97 $0.00 $5.58 $1.10 $0.47 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0.00 $17.29 $23.46 $12.60 $72.57 Boca Raton Palm Beach $12.72 $28.28 $7.98 $7.47 $9.60 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $14.74 $7.76 $12.96 $13.34 $14.07 Delray Beach Palm Beach $14.90 $16.57 $11.85 $26.94 $19.10 Greenacres Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $5.79 $0.00 $0.00 Highland Beach Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $2.64 $0.00 $12.04 Jupiter Palm Beach $0.76 $7.89 $1.53 $3.22 $9.96 Lake Worth Palm Beach $3.88 $1.02 $6.60 $0.00 $0.00 Lantana Palm Beach $0.90 $0.30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Manalapan Palm Beach $0.00 $2.82 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 North Palm Beach Palm Beach $0.40 $66.80 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Ocean Ride Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Pahokee Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.36 Palm Beach Palm Beach $0.47 $9.31 $6.81 $0.00 $0.00 Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach $1.78 $8.59 $6.19 $0.00 $0.00 Palm Springs Palm Beach $3.47 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $0.00 $18.09 $55.48 $49.38 $26.30 Ro al Palm Beach Palm Beach $4.05 $0.00 $8.54 $0.00 $0.00 South Bay Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $186.79 West Palm Beach Palm Beach $75.60 $80.95 $80.25 $92.20 $105.36 Dade City Pasco $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $289-62 .. $228.50 New Port Riche Pasco $42.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Port Riche Pasco $0.00 $159.29 $0.00 $36.06 $72.14 Ze h rhills Pasco $0.77 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Clearwater Pinellas $34.39 $21.44 $17.32 $20.71 $25.25 Dunedin Pinellas $0.00 $43.99 $1.41 $4.59 $0.00 Lag o Pinellas $41.02 $21.99 $17.00 $25.84 $6.48 Madeira Beach Pinellas $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $65.40 $96.76 Oldsmar Pinellas $0.00 $0.00 $17.14 $6.37 $0.00 125 Appendix B Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Pinellas Park Pinellas $2.98 $10.04 $11.47 $9.21 $4.10 Saint Petersburg Pinellas $27.26 $31.15 $27.67 $28.59 $38.74 Tarpon Springs Pinellas $0.00 $12.52 $13.04 $11.17 $14.19 Treasure Island Pinellas $11.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Bartow Polk $29.64 $0.00 $35.18 $16.33 $19.58 Dundee Polk $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $402.64 Eagle Lake Polk $212.46 $7.33 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Meade Polk $0.00 $0.00 $14.85 $0.00 $0.00 Frostproof Polk $0.00 $0.00 $1,096.61 $0.00 $0.00 Haines City Polk $9.17 $2.07 $57.48 $24.64 $6.07 Lake Alfred Polk $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7.27 $0.00 Lakeland Polk $47.08 $30.48 $25.24 $19.65 $34.43 Polk City, Polk $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $721.98 Winter Haven Polk $30.10 $16.57 $0.00 $31.83 $26.26 Crescent City Putnam $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3.94 $551.57 Palatka Putnam $128.31 $56.22 $59.90 $0.00 $42.49 Welaka Putnam $157.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hastings Saint Johns $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $44.18 $12.55 $20.59 $10.83 $1.85 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $42.48 $21.11 $0.00 $21.35 $9.01 Gulf Breeze Santa Rosa $0.00 $3.04 $8.12 $0.00 $0.00 Jay Santa Rosa $48.14 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,305.42 Milton Santa Rosa $72.27 $12.53 $0.00 $0.00 $83.14 Sarasota Sarasota $96.72 $96.29 $93.50 $67.75 $69.20 Venice Sarasota $99.39 $0.00 $22.46 $0.00 $0.00 Altamonte Springs Seminole $0.00 $0.28 $1.11 $0.00 $0.00 Casselber Seminole $0.00 $23.61 $1.08 $13.57 $31.59 Lake Ma Seminole $0.00 $0.00 $0.59 $0.00 $0.00 Longwood Seminole $0.00 $2.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Oviedo Seminole $0.00 $15.14 $12.23 $14.18 $10.92 Sanford Seminole $12.31 $16.91 $24.88 $33.15 $15.64 Winter Springs Seminole $0.00 $20.84 $10.62 $0.00 $0.00 Bushnell Sumter $0.00 $173.90 $0.00 $1,128.85 $991.48 Coleman Sumter $974.05 $990.96 $1,010.48 $1,034.42 $1,045.10 Wildwood Sumter $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3.10 Live Oak Suwannee $15.46 $4.04 $0.00 $0.00 $12.68 Per Taylor $0.00 $1.24 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Daytona Beach Volusia $30.92 $29.95 $41.10 $49.42 $29.96 Daytona Beach Shores Volusia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12.95 $0.00 DeBa Volusia $0.00 $5.84 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Deland Volusia $42.93 $21.34 $25.81 $24.37 $22.95 Deltona Volusia $0.00 $5.35 $4.36 $7.41 $4.80 Edgewater Volusia $0.00 $6.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Holly Hill Volusia $0.00 $9.10 $41.36 $0.00 $4.56 Lake Helen Volusia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6.55 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $39.78 $13.81 $11.93 $49.01 $32.33 Orange City Volusia $0.00 $7.40 $19.39 $0.00 $0.00 126 Appendix B Per Capita Expenditures of Federal Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 - Ormond Beach Volusia $20.93 $19.62 $7.97 $0.00 $9.62 Ponce Inlet Volusia $1.65 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Port Orange Volusia $11.17 $8.89 $3.92 $5.97 $6.10 So chop Wakulla $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 DeFuniak Springs Walton $487.57 $256.73 $23.37 $0.00 $0.00 Freeport Walton $0.00 $0.00 $2,363.24 $973.79 $802.91 Chi le Washington $16.78 $9.97 $2.09 $60.30 $299.62 Statewide Average $26.84 $66.30 $69.47 $76.48 $121.39 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" hft ://harvestOr.census. ov/sac/dissem/accessv tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 127 This page was intentionally left blank. 128 Appendix C: Expenditures by Source Agency 129 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 Coun 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $491,909 $3,011,261 $2,532,539 $56,403 $7,099 Baker $239,224 $1,333,998 $181,946 $0 $0 Bay $434,340 $1,658,165 $2,433,429 $1,070,996 $3,250,184 Bradford $0 $701,539 $0 $0 $0 Brevard $7,124,888 $18,092,041 $13,594,416 $678,110 $1,113,093 Broward $37,659,494 $6,846,244 $1,148,510 $1,686,475 $105,659 Calhoun $6,040,494 $589,655 $673,220 $1,571,948 $9,926,533 Charlotte $3,750,097 $25,034,174 $25,546,350 $310,548 $0 Citrus $284,232 $7,484,784 $1,972,495 $74,594 $158,326 Clay $720,541 $1,860,981 $1,283,846 $28,350 . $0 Collier $29,696,336 $519,372 $3,315,772 $35,922 $3,200 Columbia $0 $0 $0 $106,316 $0 DeSoto $390,227 $0 $17,307,163 $0 $0 Dixie $723,369 $652,026 $230,060 $63,904 $342,355 Escambia $31,910,256 $187,774,990 $9,926,030 $632,809 $510,322 Fla ler $19,570 $354,571 $1,797,137 $0 $764,069 Franklin $0 $551,804 $70,305 $48,372 $0 Gadsen $131,084 $206,232 $45,840 $47,279 $114,013 Gilchrist $414,225 $340,472 $0 $227 $152,222 Glades $284,784 $90,627 $6,392 $0 $0 Gulf $1,100,971 $917,533 $0 $396,039 $107,828 Hamilton $0 $313,161 $8,000 $4,201 $120,034 Hardee $1,226,618 $8,761,335 $198,002 $2,836,571 $86,000 Hernando $1,182,685 $3,785,634 $1,528,671 $315,673 $194,659 Highlands $523,071 $3,189,869 $579,374 $55,424 $602,725 Hillsborough $732,718 $29,565,451 $2,401,406 $232,604 $996,988 Holmes $1,042,444 $1,115,520 $121,390 $1,469,138 $3,310,631 Indian River $3,051,383 $12,185,475 $8,521,847 $0 $0 Jackson $0 $363,546 $0 $0 $45,000 Jefferson $126,288 $229,363 $0 $0 $0 Lake $195,874 $14,667,105 $5,153,951 $30,475 $22,424 Lee $9,579,897 $1,935,181 $18,019,619 $100,551 $240,470 Leon $508,312 $1,575,173 $2,014,619 $531,113 $701,113 Lev $0 $52,482 $366,929 $274,357 $0 Liberty $799,664 $1,105,230 $122,995 $29,991 $144,236 Manatee $2,533,177 $4,408,845 $2,733,531 $1,435,276 $3,933,690 Marion $414,051 $16,691,319 $5,690,091 $180,668 $0 Martin $10,611,572 $17,971,426 $7,321,400 $0 $0 Miami-Dade $146,701,110 $99,124,503 $114,490,127 $133,253,105 $41,376,363 Monroe $14,318,284 $1,732,386 $332,144 $98,217 $321,089 Nassau $358,304 $201,728 $7,424 $0 $0 Okaloosa $1,219,831 $12,277,962 $6,509,593 $371,056 $1,274,696 Okeechobee $0 $915,623 $511,922 $37,907 $37,907 .Orange $5,012,506 $20,983,609 $46,316,797 $146,826 $604,141 Osceola $0 $10,064,555 $11,273,158 $244,595 $0 Palm Beach $27,741,653 $42,743,318 $26,893,948 $164,260 $291,335 130 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 Coun 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Pasco $739,200 $4,367,104 $1,664,736 $1,545,505 $112,884 Pinellas $32,400 $3,423,185 $4,785,294 $747,881 $98,116 Polk $2,942,728 $28,838,619 $10,337,630 $76,164 $1,051,251 Putnam $945,730 $1,531,575 $429,000 $395,748 $150,797 Saint Johns $1,676,876 $1,488,398 $1,992,589 $59,500 $187,000 Saint Lucie $54,428 $702 $6,386,339 $486,627 $7,391 Santa Rosa $6,149,702 $55,812,014 $2,135,434 $2,211,574 $79,583 Sarasota $1,064,370 $1,670,484 $2,546,237 $1,041,536 $4,306,008 Seminole $2,318,537 $18,589,399 $14,203,385 $227,291 $275,401 Sumter $439,535 $984,979 $874,830 $8,251 $0 Suwannee $44,123 $736,152 $47,009 $884 $22,980 Taylor $0 $201,223 $0 $0 $0 Union $0 $0 $443,215 $0 $191,773 Volusia $1,241,784 $18,282,788 $20,536,304 $474,718 $232,691 Wakulla $0 $522,290 $206,873 $109,677 $1,360,431 Walton $1,807,345 $6,957,035 $468,994 $23,544 $482,582 Washington $1,238,592 $906,910 $0 $2,796,576 $1,179,240 Statewide Total $ 369,990,833 $ 708,293,125 $ 410,240,257 $ 158,825 776 $ 80,596,532 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records 131 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Sept mber 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $2.02 $12.51 $10.72 $0.24 $0.03 Baker $9.57 $55.69 $7.59 $0.00 $0.00 Bay $2.62 $10.25 $15.36 $6.92 $21.36 Bradford $0.00 $24.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Brevard $13.12 $34.01 $26.07 $1.34 $2.25 Broward $21.48 $3.93 $0.67 $0.99 $0.06 Calhoun $428.01 $42.28 $49.47 $116.97 $750.25 Charlotte $23.39 $162.53 $162.73 $2.04 $0.00 Citrus $2.08 $56.43 $15.28 $0.59 $1.29 Clay $4.07 $10.97 $7.85 $0.18 $0.00 Collier $90.91 $1.63 $10.83 $0.12 $0.01 Columbia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.81 $0.00 DeSoto $11.77 $0.00 $507.47 $0.00 $0.00 Dixie $46.14 $42.40 $15.41 $4.35 $23.68 Escambia $103.05 $618.45 $32.31 $2.09 $1.70 Fla ler $0.22 $4.51 $25.79 $0.00 $13.46 Franklin $0.00 $50.88 $6.60 $4.62 $0.00 Gadsen $2.72 $4.32 $0.98 $1.02 $2.48 Gilchrist $24.80 $20.99 $0.00 $0.01 $10.13 Glades $26.38 $8.45 $0.60 $0.00 $0.00 Gulf $66.69 $55.68 $0.00 $25.36 $7.09 Hamilton $0.00 $21.88 $0.56 $0.30 $8.62 Hardee $45.12 $320.54 $7.13 $103.52 $3.13 Hernando $7.53 $25.11 $10.53 $2.24 $1.43 _Highlands $5.41 $34.13 $6.29 $0.61 $6.77 Hillsborough $0.63 $26.13 $2.17 $0.22 $0.94 Holmes $53.45 $58.23 $6.38 $77.57 $176.96 Indian River $22.56 $93.70 $67.19 $0.00 $0.00 Jackson $0.00 $7.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.94 Jefferson $8.80 $16.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Lake $0.71 $55.76 $20.46 $0.13 $0.10 Lee $16.36 $3.52 $34.57 $0.20 $0.51 Leon $1.87 $5.81 $7.63 $2.08 $2.83 Lev $0.00 $1.38 $9.79 $7.48 $0.00 Liberty $102.89 $145.79 $16.72 $4,15 $20.15 Manatee $8.22 $14.49 $9.26 $5.00 $14.18 Marion $1.31 $54.74 $19.40 $0.64 $0.00 Martin $74.39 $127.40 $53.19 $0.00 $0.00 Miami-Dade $60.20 $40.93 $48.11 $56.80 $17.89 Monroe $177.84 $21.02 $4.09 $1.22 $3.96 Nassau $5.25 $3.07 $0.11 $0.00 $0.00 Okaloosa $6.33 $64.98 $35.04 $2.05 $7.20 Okeechobee $0.00 $24.25 $13.47 $1.02 $1.04 Orange $4.64 $20.11 $45.68 $0.15 $0.63 Osceola $0.00 $42.80 $49.92 $1.16 $0.00 Palm Beach $21.54 $33.77 $21.65 $0.14 $0.25 132 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Sept mber 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Pasco $1.74 $10.73 $4.27 $4.12 $0.31 Pinellas $0.03 $3.61 $5.07 $0.80 $0.11 Polk $5.21 $53.22 $19.56 $0.15 $2.09 Putnam $12.71 $20.76 $5.86 $5.50 $2.11 Saint Johns $10.14 $9.46 $13.34 $0.43 $1.40 Saint Lucie $0.21 $0.00 $28.23 $2.30 $0.04 Santa Rosa $43.48 $409.05 $15.97 $17.16 $0.64 Sarasota $2.81 $4.54 $7.11 $2.99 $12.68 Seminole $5.51 $45.15 $35.21 $0.58 $0.71 Sumter $5.32 $13.30 $13.17 $0.13 $0.00 Suwannee $1.14 $19.28 $1.25 $0.02 $0.64 Taylor $0.00 $9.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Union $0.00 $0.00 $30.32 $0.00 $13.90 Volusia $2.46 $36.96 $42.41 $1.01 $0.51 Wakulla $0.00 $19.44 $8.11 $4.40 $56.18 Walton $32.40 $129.98 $9.28 $0.50 $10.60 Washington $53.68 $39.27 $0.00 $127.62 $54.47 Statewide Average $26.68 $52.51 $26.20 $9.89 $20.96 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" http://harvester.census.gov/sac/d issem/accessotions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 133 - Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Munici ali County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua Alachua $420,293 $681,884 $0 $0 $0 Archer Alachua $0 $334,652 $0 $0 $0 Gainesville Alachua $297,518 $8,468,589 $2,511,815 $186,976 $0 High Springs Alachua $0 $0 $131,600 $0 $0 Macclenn Baker $0 $0 $0 $5,626 $41,049 Cedar Grove Bay $0 $46,865 $0 $0 $0 Lynn Haven Bay $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,723 Mexico Beach Bay $519,399 $0 $0 $0 $0 Panama City Bay $185,339 $1,491,193 $22,708 $13,659 $0 Panama City Beach Bay $523,656 $488,177 $0 $0 $29,620 Parker Bay $25,378 $0 $0 $0 $0 Springfield Bay $0 $23,114 $111,385 $0 $67,554 Hampton Bradford $0 $0 $0 $5,005 $0 Starke Bradford $12,004 $294,327 $0 $0 $0 Cocoa Brevard $126,569 $465,557 $854,389 $0 $0 Cocoa Beach Brevard $0 $417,178 $410,000 $0 $0 Malabar Brevard $0 $0 $0 $513,193 $0 Melbourne Brevard $809,150 $337,974 $5,368,106 $204,897 $63,332 Palm Bay Brevard $1,056,671 $3,785,155 $3,804,633 $162,392 $0 Rockledge Brevard $0 $579,758 $0 $0 $0 Satellite Beach Brevard $218,422 $0 $0 $0 $0 Titusville Brevard $192,418 $398,569 $859,407 $241,648 $756,220 Coo er City Broward $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Coral Springs Broward $19,903,688 $614,300 $2,037,709 $15,281 $10,115 Dania Beach Broward $2,633,897 $442,432 $224,031 $0 $0 Davie Broward $0 $1,071,650 $721,266 $24,096 $0 Deerfield Beach Broward $9,240,648 $50,268 $2,028,283 $39,275 $76,232 Fort Lauderdale Broward $42,164,475 $5,077,104 $3,675,023 $4,442 $0 Hallandale Beach Broward $3,053,193 $768,813 $828,140 $541,873 $207,753 Holl ood Broward $20,982,076 $2,862,269 $2,709,836 $79,102 $723,490 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $2,534,607 $0 $0 $0 $0 Lauderhill Broward $6,018,082 $0 $440,376 $0 $0 Margate Broward $6,376,989 . $281,176 $473,379 $0 $0 Miramar Broward $12,500,393 $1,079,188 $7,400 $43,337 $55,351 North Lauderdale Broward $3,144,611 $184,473 $446,142 $0 $0 Oakland Park Broward $5,630,131 $533,770 $446,186 $114,564 $0 Parkland Broward $0 $0 $735,814 $0 $0 Pembroke Park Broward $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,714 Pembroke Pines Broward $31,005,167 $1,419,810 $656,620 $0 $6,616 Plantation Broward $21,505,599 $1,846,414 $1,695,088 $0 $0 Pompano Beach Broward $9,122,616 $730,364 $1,308,974 $0 $0 Southwest Ranches Broward $8,730,275 $951,824 $0 $0 $0 Sunrise Broward $7,708,238 $143,586 $558,319 $274,625 $4,747 Tamarac Broward $6,990,141 $334,856 $832,472 $2,772 $35,866 Weston Broward $5,427,447 $0 $571,480 $0 $0 Wilton Manors Broward $0 $0 $367,012 $0 $0 Blountstown Calhoun $77,156 $01 . $0 $0 $0 134 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Punta Gorda Charlotte $0 $0 $0 $1,017,960 $0 Crystal River Citrus $0 $301,046 $273,681 $0 $0 Green Cove Springs Clay $9,260 $80,084 $261,999 $0 $0 Everglades Collier $902,643 $0 $0 $0 $0 Marco Island Collier $635,882 $0 $384,765 $0 $0 Naples Collier $6,616,651 $604,905 $424,377 $145,710 $0 Lake Cit Columbia $0 $0 $168,765 $0 $0 Arcadia De Soto $0 $577,270 $682,299 $0 $0 Baldwin Dixie $0 $1,623 $0 $0 $0 Cross City Dixie $0 $77,363 $0 $0 $0 Jacksonville Duval $3,411,611 $8,028,566 $9,453,503 $296,158 $30,518 Jacksonville Beach Duval $0 $0 $1,052,620 $0 $0 Pensacola Escambia $11,664,784 $46,855,390 $1,941,594 $0 $131,051 Palm Coast Flagler $63,067 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fla ler Beach Flagler /Volusia $3,550 $0 $0 $0 $0 Apalachicola Franklin $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 Chattahoochee Gadsden $0 $45,143 $0 $0 $0 Greensboro Gadsden $0 $0 $0 $21,040 $0 Moore Haven Glades $178,672 $0 $0 $0 $0 Port St. Joe Gulf $0 $0 $0 $279,608 $0 White Springs Hamilton $0 $41,869 $0 $0 $0 Wauchula Hardee $23,083 $314,027 $2,505,933 $3,302 $0 Zolfo Springs Hardee $0 $0 $164,761 $0 $0 Brooksville Hernando $0 $0 $323,183 $6,901 $0 Avon Park Highlands $0 $537,012 $357,336 $53,100 $0 Lake Placid Highlands $0 $0 $71,763 $0 $0 Sebring Highlands $55,569 $681,281 $1,069,192 $0 $7,534 Plant City Hillsborough $0 $1,561,363 $0 $31,888 $978,117 Tama Hillsborough $420,041 $1,118,724 $6,850,132 $114,375 $15,713 Temple Terrace Hillsborough $36,479 $989,151 $0 $0 $0 Bonifa Holmes $29,088 $74,920 $0 $0 $0 Indian River Shores Indian River $0 $0 $220,205 $0 $0 Sebastian Indian River $0 $2,419,011 $800,487 $0 $0 Vero Beach Indian River $487,619 $11,625,125 $5,847,630 $0 $0 Alford Jackson $14,342 $211,500 $0 $0 $0 Grand Ride Jackson $0 $15,737 $0 $0 $72,675 Marianna Jackson $39,802 $25,306 $32,275 $0 $0 Eustis Lake $0 $258,033 $298,850 $0 $0 Leesburg Lake $253,358 $435,488 $1,313,326 $0 $0 Mount Dora Lake $0 $0 $360,687 $0 $0 Tavares Lake $0 $62,513 $136,259 $0 $0 Bonita S rings Lee $451,874 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cape Coral Lee $2,202,937 $6,951,404 $8,487,758 $0 $0 Fort Meyers Lee $2,277,808 $1,036,906 $3,654,037 $56,960 $0 Fort Meyers Beach Lee 626532 $566,396 $0 $551,461 $386,960 Sanibel Lee $1,620,676 $1,806,674 $3,320,784 $0 $0 135 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Tallahassee Leon $250,969 $1,474,582 $4,223,752 $1,788,866 $817,404 Chiefland Levy $0 $50,831 $0 $0 $0 Williston Levy $0 $0 $124,736 $0 $0 Yankeetown Levy $0 $92,096 $0 $0 $0 Bradenton Manatee $0 $0 $424,515 $0 $0 Palmetto Manatee $0 $15,686 $0 $0 $0 Longboat Key Manatee /Sarasota $58,204 $0 $0 $0 $0 Dunnellon Marion $0 $185,588 $0 $0 $0 Ocala Marion $19,663 $3,964,116 $2,641,959 $368,311 $0 Jupiter Island Martin $4,961,064 $1,457,818 $0 $0 $949,679 Stuart Martin $1,168,356 $1,322,336 $0 $0 $0 Aventura Miami-Dade $1,618,227 $0 $0 $0 $0 Biscayne Park Miami-Dade $878,972 $0 $0 $0 $0 Coral Gables Miami-Dade $12,988,137 $10,117,038 $1,464,381 $0 $0 El Portal Miami-Dade $596,390 $0 $0 $0 $0 Florida City Miami-Dade $0 $0 $21,761 $0 $0 Golden Beach Miami-Dade $117,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 Hialeah Miami-Dade $9,017,543 $1,665,313 $191,479 $0 $0 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $618,168 $0 $0 $0 $0 Homestead Miami-Dade $7,104,875 $602,634 $0 $0 $0 Key Biscayne Miami-Dade $0 $656,112 $0 $0 $0 Medley Miami-Dade $1,168,050 $21,994 $0 $0 $353,767 Miami Miami-Dade $23,025,578 $6,027,701 $1,061,231 $244,691 $0 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0 $1,532,919 $629,217 $99,778 $0 North Bay Miami-Dade $488,573 $0 $0 $0 $0 North Miami Miami-Dade $5,406,624 $961,013 $4,519,091 $256,407 $28 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $4,517,037 $559,750 $545,221 $0 $0 Opa-Locka Miami-Dade $4,601,330 $15,792,892 $5,789,405 $5,537,112 $0 Pinecrest Miami-Dade $850,819 $0 $0 $0 $0 South Miami Miami-Dade $1,743,100 $1,680,638 $0 $0 $0 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $799,227 $1,617,754 $1,243,522 $1,730,303 $889,375 West Miami Miami-Dade $2,030,195 $6,592,888 $1,298,930 $619,483 $426,424 Islamorada Monroe $0 $1,935,976 $1,183,703 $0 $0 Key West Monroe $8,460,289 $2,508,466 $166,314 $1,780,936 $4,093,930 Marathon Monroe $4,056,223 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fernandina Beach Nassau $0 $0 $586,862 $0 $0 Crestview Okaloosa $0 $89,566 $979,277 $0 $0 Destin Okaloosa $0 $2,043,216 $0 $0 $0 Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $241,032 $2,486,159 . $1,960,426 $295,741 $335,116 Ma Esther Okaloosa $796,641 $623,697 $0 $0 $0 Niceville Okaloosa $0 $360,655 $435,750 $0 $0 Okeechobee Okeechobee $0 $295,143 $6,230 $0 $0 Apopka Orange $0 $0 $370,049 $135,000 $0 Belle Isle Orange $0 $0 $2,342,464 $0 $0 Maitland Orange $0 $714,617 $3,297,484 $0 $0 Orlando Oran a $3,022,419 $11,235,821 $11,141,372 $0 $0 136 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Windermere Orange $0 $978,212 $912,479 $0 $0 Winter Garden Orange $0 $164,172 $317,429 $2,800 $0 Winter Park Orange $882,520 $9,684,756 $0 $0 $0 Kissimmee Osceola $846,212 $2,591,788 $5,526,159 $0 $0 Saint Cloud Osceola $88,478 $0 $2,139,020 $0 $0 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0 $340,155 $1,255,218 $0 $0 Boca Raton Palm Beach $17,018,927 $0 $4,629,831 $11,541 $0 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $4,289,512 $394,267 $1,360,780 $0 $0 Delray Beach Palm Beach $7,426,913 $1,072,501 $2,740,994 $145,803 $0 Greenacres Palm Beach $0 $0 $405,343 $0 $0 Highland Beach Palm Beach $108,068 $0 $47,525 $0 $0 Jupiter Palm Beach $1,350,626 $6,754,603 $1,473,379 $417,463 $281,787 Lake Worth Palm Beach $11,905,226 $2,412,281 $11,163,587 $0 $0 Lantana Palm Beach $687,382 $716,719 $0 $0 $0 Manala an Palm Beach $0 $9,777 $0 $0 $0 North Palm Beach Palm Beach $645,272 $834,008 $0 $0 $0 Ocean Ride Palm Beach $221,434 $240,518 $0 $0 $0 Palm Beach Palm Beach $6,994,532 $3,671,469 $1,899,218 $0 $0 Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach $2,753,657 $748,609 $1,920,258 $238,215 $0 Palm Springs Palm Beach $653,946 $0 $0 $0 $0 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $0 $1,280,160 $1,493,536 $0 $0 Royal Palm Beach Palm Beach $836,650 $0 $926,431 $0 $0 Wellington Palm Beach $10,448,509 $0 $0 $0 $0 West Palm Beach Palm Beach $7,767,089 $4,882,960 $6,159,155 $80,687 $95,032 New Port Riche Pasco $8,754 $0 $0 $0 $0 Clearwater Pinellas $53,105 $941,521 $1,147,782 $0 $0 Dunedin Pinellas $0 $461,636 $489,771 $133,246 $0 Largo Pinellas $14,070 $1,073,262 $461,062 $0 $0 Madeira Beach Pinellas $0 $0 $0 $291,950 $398,658 Oldsmar Pinellas $0 $0 $57,000 $0 $0 Pinellas Park Pinellas $26,950 $454,039 $0 $0 $65,020 Saint Petersbur Pinellas $137,198 $1,121,574 $1,466,117 $211,579 $116,664 Tarpon Springs Pinellas $0 $474,723 $406,220 $0 $0 Treasure Island Pinellas $32,920 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bartow Polk $161,224 $0 $1,715,231 $23,098 $0 Ea le Lake Polk $0 $112,718 $0 $0 $0 Fort Meade Polk $0 $0 $763,390 $0 $0 Frostproof Polk $0 $0 $301,389 $0 $0 Haines City Polk $136,225 $264,129 $405,222 $79,020 $0 Lakeland Polk $270,796 $3,043,563 $16,289,476 $0 $0 Winter Haven Polk $8,041 $945,531 $0 $125,163 $73,620 Palatka Putnam $50,955 $182,225 $246,673 $0 $4,833 Welaka Putnam $0 $0 $0 $39,353 $0 Hastings Saint Johns $0 $16,109 $0 $0 $0 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $1,526,817 $9,367,489 $16,920,681 $0 $3,762 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $4,889,514 $9,896,795 $0 $0 $11,497 Gulf Breeze Santa Rosa $0 $5,774,077 $638,367 $0 $0 137 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Milton Santa Rosa $204,805 $2,978,152 $0 $0 $0 Sarasota Sarasota $712,889 $218,564 $338,223 $7,342 $832,581 Venice Sarasota $390,649 $0 $397,095 $41,916 $0 Altamonte Springs Seminole $0 $1,577,965 $1,844,305 $0 $0 Casselber Seminole $0 $1,250,517 $1,711,589 $0 $0 Lake Ma Seminole $0 $0 $1,973,949 $0 $0 Longwood Seminole $0 $548,381 $1,215,102 $0 $0 Oviedo Seminole $0 $3,804,484 $3,682,128 $68,072 $71,959 Sanford Seminole $0 $0 $4,783,049 $0 $0 Winter Sprin s Seminole $0 $1,872,271 $4,962,735 $0 $0 Bushnell Sumter $0 $100,156 $0 $0 $0 Coleman Sumter $0 $23,823 $19,481 $0 $0 Live Oak Suwannee $0 $104,515 $0 $0 $0 Daytona Beach Volusia $1,544,731 $546,992 $4,490,475 $0 $0 DeBary Volusia $0 $1,591,952 $1,842,474 $0 $0 Deland Volusia $35,678 $0 $2,075,910 $3,520 $0 Deltona Volusia $0 $10,223,226 $5,125,521 $36,819 $67,465 Edgewater Volusia $0 $1,298,101 $2,498,724 $0 $0 Holly Hill Volusia $0 $656,683 $1,471,037 $0 $0 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $139,113 $1,496,525 $1,780,484 $59,700 $0 Orange City- Volusia $0 $347,528 $609,325 $0 $0 Ormond Beach Volusia $329,261 $1,196,057 $4,627,684 $0 $20,023 Ponce Inlet Volusia $4,383 $0 $0 $0 $0 Port Orange Volusia $143,612 $519,582 $6,821,624 $114,755 $33,860 So chopp Wakulla $0 $0 $0 $154,866 $0 DeFuniak Springs Walton $34,582 $159,888 $110,634 $0 $0 Chi ley Washington $0 $71,292 $99,440 $109,200 $0 Statewide Total $ 311,105,623 $ 279,038,741 $ 27,104,090 $ 16,100,952 $14,619,965 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt ://harvester.censg§. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions. html?submit= Retrieve+ Records 138 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Count 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Alachua Alachua $54.89 $92.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Archer Alachua $0.00 $272.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Gainesville Alachua $2.46 $7.64 $21.33 $1.60 $0.00 High Springs Alachua $0.00 $0.00 $3.39 $0.00 $0.00 Macclenny Baker $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.16 $0.00 Cedar Grove Bay $0.00 $7.61 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Lynn Haven Bay $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3.61 Mexico Beach Bay $446.22 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Panama City Bay $4.94 $4.45 $0.61 $0.37 $0.00 Panama City Beach Bay $52.34 $54.41 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Parker Bay $5.41 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Springfield Bay $0.00 $2.56 $12.48 $0.00 $7.60 Hampton Bradford $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.83 $0.00 Starke Bradford $1.98 $5.57 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cocoa Brevard $7.28 $26.44 $51.44 $0.00 $0.00 Cocoa Beach Brevard $0.00 $32.39 $31.97 $0.00 $0.00 Malabar Brevard $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $189.17 $0.00 Melbourne Brevard $1.54 $4.53 $71.92 $2.78 $0.87 Palm Bay Brevard $1.93 $41.19 $42.96 $1.92 $0.00 Rockledge Brevard $0.00 $23.58 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Satellite Beach Brevard $19.97 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Titusville Brevard $4.37 $9.20 $19.97 $5.72 $18.38 Cooper City Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Coral Springs Broward $153.57 $4.84 $16.82 $0.12 $0.82 Dania Beach Broward $92.24 $15.44 $7.98 $0.00 $0.00 Davie Broward $0.00 $12.80 $8.81 $0.33 $0.00 Deerfield Beach Broward $122.23 $0.67 $31.15 $0.67 $1.18 Fort Lauderdale Broward $239.79 $29.63 $21.59 $0.26 $0.00 Hallandale Beach Broward $85.18 $21.53 $23.57 $15.52 $6.66 Holl ood Broward $146.43 $2.12 $18.95 $0.55 $5.13 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $78.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Lauderhill Broward $95.32 $0.00 $7.62 $0.00 $0.00 Margate Broward $115.25 $5.11 $8.69 $0.00 $0.00 Miramar Broward $113.38 $9.96 $0.73 $0.45 $0.63 North Lauderdale Broward $75.63 $4.5$ $11.76 $0.00 $0.00 Oakland Park Broward $132.72 $16.78 $14.27 $3.70 $0.00 Parkland Broward $0.00 $0.00 $37.98 $0.00 $0.00 Pembroke Park Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Pembroke Pines Broward $2427 $9.40 $4.36 $0.00 $0.46 Plantation Broward $253.33 $21.68 $2.36 $0.00 $0.00 Pompano Beach Broward $9.24 $7.19 $15.14 $0.00 $0.00 Southwest Ranches Broward $1,177.38 $127.81 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Sunrise Broward $85.96 $1.69 $6.27 $3.14 $0.55 Tamarac Broward $117.96 $5.73 $14.42 $0.49 $0.64 Weston Broward $88.66 $0.00 $9.42 $0.00 $0.00 Wilton Manors Broward $0.00 $0.00 $29.88 $0.00 $0.00 139 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Blountstown Calhoun $31.16 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Punta Gorda Charlotte $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $61.36 $0.00 Crystal River Citrus $0.00 $81.14 $74.27 $0.00 $0.00 Green Cove Springs Clay $1.45 $13.26 $43.98 $0.00 $0.00 Everglades Collier $1,712.80 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Marco Island Collier $4.45 $0.00 $24.72 $0.00 $0.00 Naples Collier $288.56 $26.90 $18.99 $6.52 $0.00 Lake City Columbia $0.00 $0.00 $15.84 $0.00 $0.00 Arcadia De Soto $0.00 $86.57 $99.55 $0.00 $0.00 Baldwin Dixie $0.00 $0.99 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cross City Dixie $0.00 $43.63 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Jacksonville Duval $4.87 $9.83 $11.88 $0.38 $0.40 Jacksonville Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $48.86 $0.00 $0.00 Pensacola Escambia $211.96 $854.64 $34.45 $0.00 $2.33 Palm Coast Flagler $0.93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fla ler Beach Flagler Nolusia $0.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Apalachicola Franklin $0.00 $0.00 $18.66 $0.00 $0.00 Chattahoochee Gadsden $0.00 $11.57 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Greensboro Gadsden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $33.13 $ 0.00 Moore Haven Glades $19.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Port St. Joe Gulf $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $76.98 $0.00 White Springs Hamilton $0.00 $54.23 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Wauchula Hardee $5.18 $76.37 $568.88 $0.76 $ 0.00 Zolfo Springs Hardee $0.00 $0.00 $99.13 $0.00 $ 0.00 Brooksville Hernando $0.00 $0.00 $44.40 $0.95 $ 0.00 Avon Park Highlands $0.00 $61.18 $4.74 $6.18 $ 0.00 Lake Placid Highlands $0.00 $0.00 $41.84 $0.00 $ 0.00 Sebring Highlands $5.44 $67.23 $16.54 $0.00 $ 0.77 Plant City Hillsborough $0.00 $48.18 $0.00 $1.15 $ 3.84 Tampa Hillsborough $1.27 $3.43 $21.16 $0.36 $ 0.54 Temple Terrace Hillsborough $1.58 $44.93 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Bonifa Holmes $1.65 $27.49 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Indian River Shores Indian River $0.00 $0.00 $6.38 $0.00 $ 0.00 Sebastian Indian River $0.00 $12.67 $41.34 $0.00 $ 0.00 Vero Beach Indian River $26.85 $649.63 $324.65 $0.00 $ 0.00 Alford Jackson $29.15 $433.42 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Grand Ride Jackson $0.00 $17.29 $0.00 $0.00 $83.64 Marianna Jackson $6.66 $3.90 $5.85 $0.00 $0.00 Eustis Lake $0.00 $14.96 $17.72 $0.00 $0.00 Leesburg Lake $13.45 $24.93 $78.74 $0.00 $0.00 Mount Dora Lake $0.00 $0.00 $33.53 $0.00 $0.00 Tavares Lake $0.00 $5.51 $12.46 $0.00 $0.00 Bonita S wings Lee $1.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cape Coral Lee $14.26 $49.58 $64.12 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Meyers Lee $34.65 $16.88 $63.45 $1.84 $0.00 140 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Fort Meyers Beach Lee $91.15 $82.70 $0.00 $56.97 $0.00 Sanibel Lee $256.40 $288.54 $524.20 $0.00 $0.00 Tallahassee Leon $1.42 $8.44 $24.97 $11.21 $5.22 Chiefland Lev $0.00 $24.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Williston Levy $0.00 $0.00 $53.64 $0.00 $0.00 Yankeetown Lev $0.00 $123.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Bradenton Manatee $0.00 $0.00 $8.78 $0.00 $0.00 Palmetto Manatee $0.00 $1.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Longboat Key Manatee /Sarasota $7.59 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Dunnellon Marion $0.00 $94.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Ocala Marion $0.38 $8.18 $55.77 $7.81 $0.00 Jupiter Island Martin $7,899.78 $2,343.76 $0.00 $0.00 $1,531.74 Stuart Martin $7.13 $8.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Aventura Miami-Dade $54.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Biscayne Park Miami-Dade $264.76 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Coral Gables Miami-Dade $292.50 $227.38 $33.22 $0.00 $0.00 El Portal Miami-Dade $233.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Florida City Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $2.50 $0.00 $0.00 Golden Beach Miami-Dade $125.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hialeah Miami-Dade $39.49 $7.23 $0.82 $0.00 $0.00 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $3.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Homestead Miami-Dade $164.59 $15.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Key Biscayne Miami-Dade $0.00 $57.43 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Medley Miami-Dade $96.87 $19.43 $0.00 $0.00 $316.43 Miami Miami-Dade $58.84 $15.58 $2.80 $0.66 $0.00 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0.00 $16.39 $6.87 $1.13 $0.00 North Bay Miami-Dade $84.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 North Miami Miami-Dade $9.51 $15.93 $75.19 $4.27 $0.00 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $111.16 $13.69 $12.87 $0.00 $0.00 O a-Locka Miami-Dade $297.19 $122.92 $359.23 $355.13 $0.00 Pinecrest Miami-Dade $43.56 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 South Miami Miami-Dade $165.57 $158.89 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $55.96 $112.56 $87.17 $121.17 $62.37 West Miami Miami-Dade $353.45 $1,128.15 $211.83 $1.53 $71.32 Islamorada Monroe $0.00 $275.27 $169.27 $0.00 $0.00 Key West Monroe $334.15 $94.54 $6.34 $69.00 $158.35 Marathon Monroe $382.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fernandina Beach Nassau $0.00 $0.00 $5.85 $0.00 $0.00 Crestview Okaloosa $0.00 $4.88 $57.52 $0.00 $0.00 Destin Okaloosa $0.00 $169.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $11.54 $119.92 $9579 $14.42 $16.56 Ma Esther Okaloosa $186.83 $148.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Niceville Okaloosa $0.00 $27.72 $34.67 $0.00 $0.00 Okeechobee Okeechobee $0.00 $54.22 $1.14 $0.00 $0.00 Apopka Orange $0.00 $0.00 $11.23 $4.33 $0.00 141 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending Sep#ember 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Coun 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Belle Isle Orange $0.00 $0.00 $385.15 $ 0.00 $0.00 Maitland Orange $0.00 $45.86 $2.14 $ 0.00 $0.00 Orlando Orange $13.49 $51.64 $53.33 $ 0.00 $0.00 Windermere Orange $0.00 $4.41 $391.79 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Winter Garden Orange $0.00 $6.68 $14.27 $ 0.14 $ 0.00 Winter Park Orange $3.84 $347.52 $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Kissimmee Osceola $14.47 $44.51 $98.94 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Saint Cloud Osceola $2.95 $0.00 $87.69 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0.00 $22.69 $83.93 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Boca Raton Palm Beach $199.80 $0.00 $57.99 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $63.95 $6.18 $2.87 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Delray Beach Palm Beach $115.87 $16.79 $43.27 $ 2.33 $ 0.00 Greenacres Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $13.28 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Highland Beach Palm Beach $26.00 $0.00 $11.83 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Jupiter Palm Beach $27.00 $139.94 $31.98 $ 9.47 $ 0.00 Lake Worth Palm Beach $326.96 $66.93 $313.81 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Lantana Palm Beach $67.92 $74.87 $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Manala an Palm Beach $0.00 $27.55 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 North Palm Beach Palm Beach $51.37 $66.44 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Ocean Ride Palm Beach $135.27 $145.42 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Palm Beach Palm Beach $72.64 $377.14 $196.57 $0.00 $ 0.00 Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach $57.16 $16.42 $45.36 $0.00 $ 0.00 Palm Springs Palm Beach $45.62 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $0.00 $38.48 $45.37 $0.00 $0.00 Royal Palm Beach Palm Beach $27.58 $0.00 $31.67 $0.00 $0.00 Wellington Palm Beach $188.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 West Palm Beach Palm Beach $72.17 $48.29 $63.36 $0.00 $1.13 New Port Riche Pasco $ 0.53 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Clearwater Pinellas $ 0.48 $8.50 $1.44 $0.00 $0.00 Dunedin Pinellas $ 0.00 $12.33 $13.16 $3.59 $0.00 Largo Pinellas $ 0.19 $14.34 $633 $0.00 $0.00 Madeira Beach Pinellas $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $64.46 $88.18 Oldsmar Pinellas $ 0.00 $0.00 $4.15 $0.00 $0.00 Pinellas Park Pinellas $ 0.55 $9.38 $0.00 $0.00 $1.40 Saint Petersburg Pinellas $ 0.54 $4.42 $5.79 $0.84 $0.47 Tarpon Springs Pinellas $ 0.00 $2.64 $17.53 $0.00 $0.00 Treasure Island Pinellas $ 4.39 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Bartow Polk $9.96 $0.00 $19.19 $1.50 $0.00 Eagle Lake Polk $0.00 $44.71 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Meade Polk $0.00 $0.00 $13.99 $0.00 $0.00 Frostproof Polk $0.00 $0.00 $11.25 $0.00 $0.00 Haines City Polk $7.58 $16.67 $27.43 $5.60 $0.00 Lakeland Polk $2.96 $33.56 $181.54 $0.00 $0.00 Winter Haven Polk $0.26 $32.92 $0.00 $4.66 $2.77 Palatka Putnam $4.46 $16.34 $22.80 $0.00 $0.47 Welaka Putnam $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $67.39 $0.00 142 1 i n 1 C 1 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Homeland Security Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Hastings Saint Johns $0.00 $25.30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $37.15 $242.88 $433.37 $0.00 $0.97 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $33.92 $76.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.12 Gulf Breeze Santa Rosa $0.00 $11.57 $11.25 $0.00 $0.00 Milton Santa Rosa $26.64 $396.84 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Sarasota Sarasota $12.88 $3.98 $6.19 $0.13 $15.44 Venice Sarasota $19.00 $0.00 $19.83 $2.17 $0.00 Altamonte Springs Seminole $0.00 $37.28 $43.40 $0.00 $0.00 Casselberry Seminole $0.00 $5.22 $69.18 $0.00 $0.00 Lake Ma Seminole $0.00 $0.00 $143.12 $0.00 $0.00 Longwood Seminole $0.00 $39.42 $87.56 $0.00 $0.00 Oviedo Seminole $0.00 $123.52 $123.33 $2.35 $2.57 Sanford Seminole $0.00 $0.00 $13.83 $0.00 $0.00 Winter S rin s Seminole $0.00 $56.19 $15.59 $0.00 $ 0.00 Bushnell Sumter $0.00 $43.57 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Coleman Sumter $0.00 $36.48 $3.17 $0.00 $ 0.00 Live Oak Suwannee $0.00 $15.89 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Daytona Beach Volusia $23.77 $8.40 $69.25 $0.00 $ 0.00 DeBa Volusia $0.00 $87.36 $13.19 $0.00 $ 0.00 Deland Volusia $1.34 $0.00 $87.12 $0.15 $ 0.00 Deltona Volusia $0.00 $123.21 $64.27 $0.48 $ 0.91 Edgewater Volusia $0.00 $61.36 $121.$0 $0.00 $ 0.00 Holly Hill Volusia $0.00 $52.35 $116.64 $0.00 $ 0.00 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $6.84 $67.95 $83.46 $2.90 $ 0.00 Orange City Volusia $0.00 $39.26 $77.13 $0.00 $ 0.00 Ormond Beach Volusia $8.17 $3.14 $118.63 $0.00 $ 0.53 Ponce Inlet Volusia $1.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Port Orange Volusia $2.56 $9.52 $119.99 $2.26 $ 0.69 Sopchoppy Wakulla $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $376.83 $ 0.00 DeFuniak Springs Walton $6.42 $29.65 $21.25 $0.00 $ 0.00 Chi le Washington $0.00 $19.80 $27.98 $31.49 $ 0.00 Statewide Average $ 107.41 $ 70.19 $ 24.55 $ 47.20 $ 22.77 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" http://harvester,census,gov/sac/dissem/accessol2tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 143 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Housing and Urban Development Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $23,919 $79,957 $61,760 $0 $0 Brevard $5,229,763 $2,903,434 $4,050,628 $2,574,538 $2,880,146 Broward $12,377,148 $13,042,963 $8,612,364 $12,475,165 $12,334,081 Charlotte $35,545 $8,333 $0 $0 $0 Collier $3,664,251 $2,094,427 $2,105,900 $2,836,495 $1,603,776 Columbia $0 $0 $0 $7,693 $365,159 DeSoto $75,536 $0 $0 $146,102 $0 Escambia $7,213,978 $4,194,279 $5,740,457 $4,500,893 $4,094,987 Gilchrist $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Hardee $251,350 $8,333 $0 $0 $0 Highlands $36,733 $0 $0 $0 $0 Hillsborough $5,539,446 $8,937,412 $7,426,972 $6,827,723 $6,914,277 Indian River $413,752 $363,119 $206,058 $318,031 $69,029 Lake $727,710 $815,500 $920,172 $873,550 $935,532 Lee $6,344,596 $5,984,902 $6,405,305 $5,573,170 $4,074,459 Leon $0 $0 $2,000 $62,237 $108,763 Manatee $2,250,343 $2,484,141 $1,083,525 $346,983 $0 Marion $2,864,962 $1,761,690 $1,635,464 $918,616 $126,143 Martin $195,096 $105,538 $71,002 $552 $0 Miami-Dade $58,713,514 $38,088,185 $47,086,605 $54,689,432 $57,122,002 Okaloosa $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Okeechobee $0 $2,299 $0 $0 $0 Orange $13,265,848 $8,267,954 $8,190,100 $7,066,168 $10,596,985 Osceola $248,525 $0 $0 $0 $0 Palm Beach $14,691,114 $10,480,749 $11,496,625 $11,658,402 $8,545,819 Pasco $3,323,077 $4,103,654 $3,183,067 $4,367,111 $3,880,917 Pinellas $12,999,731 $6,442,439 $7,331,604 $5,767,531 $7,112,614 Polk $2,206,310 $2,783,873 $4,325,177 $4,037,046 $4,121,621 Saint Johns $0 $997,800 $0 $0 $0 Saint Lucie $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sarasota $2,096,584 $2,181,115 $1,619,326 $1,558,264 $2,284,956 Seminole $2,598,944 $4,289,288 $3,538,193 $3,881,411 $3,383,407 Sumter $173,442 $109,246 $0 $0 $0 Taylor $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Volusia $5,097,354 $4,118,484 $5,321,657 $5,521,522 $5,345,598 Statewide Total $162,658,571 $124,649,114 $130,413,961 $136,008,635 $135,900,271 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" http://harvester.census.gov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records 144 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Housing and Urban Development Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $0.10 $0.33 $0.26 $0.00 $0.00 Brevard $9.63 $5.46 $7.77 $5.07 $5.83 Broward $7.06 $7.49 $5.00 $7.35 $7.39 Charlotte $0.22 $0.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Collier $11.22 $6.59 $6.88 $9.70 $5.78 Columbia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.13 $6.26 DeSoto $2.28 $0.00 $0.00 $4.33 $0.00 Escambia $23.30 $13.81 $18.68 $14.84 $13.67 Gilchrist $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hardee $9.25 $0.30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Highlands $0.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hillsborough $4.76 $7.90 $6.70 $6.32 $6.55 Indian River $3.06 $2.79 $1.62 $2.62 $0.58 Lake $2.63 $3.10 $3.65 $3.63 $4.05 Lee $10.83 $10.89 $12.29 $11.26 $8.58 Leon $0.00 $0.00 $0.01 $0.24 $0.44 Manatee $7.30 $8.16 $3.67 $1.21 $0.00 Marion $9.09 $5.78 $5.58 $3.26 $0.47 Martin $1.37 $0.75 $0.52 $0.00 $0.00 Miami-Dade $24.09 $15.73 $19.79 $23.31 $24.70 Okaloosa $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Okeechobee $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Orange $12.29 $7.92 $8.08 $7.19 $11.09 Osceola $0.97 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Palm Beach $11.41 $8.28 $9.25 $9.62 $7.22 Pasco $7.83 $10.09 $8.17 $11.64 $10.74 Pinellas $13.71 $6.80 $7.77 $6.14 $7.62 Polk $3.90 $5.14 $8.19 $7.89 $8.20 Saint Johns $0.00 $6.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Saint Lucie $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Sarasota $5.53 $5.93 $4.52 $4.47 $6.73 Seminole $6.18 $10.42 $8.77 $9.83 $8.73 Sumter $2.10 $1.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Taylor $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Volusia $10.12 $8.33 $10.99 $11.73 $11.63 Statewide Average $5.73 $4.85 $4.79 $4.90 $4.73 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" http://harvester.census.gov/sac/dissem/accessoptions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 145 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Housing and Urban Development Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua Alachua $313,642 $0 $0 $0 $0 Gainesville Alachua $2,976,160 $2,833,477 $2,698,513 $2,624,996 $2,404,782 Lynn Haven Bay $0 $0 $0 $429,325 $290,796 Mexico Beach Bay $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Panama City Bay $844,426 $832,621 $733,693 $772,985 $356,340 Starke Bradford $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cocoa Brevard $893,565 $245,955 $544,773 $588,848 $455,333 Melbourne Brevard $1,022,278 $1,021,877 $859,158 $950,781 $1,019,381 Palm Bay Brevard $1,362,977 $1,156,783 $1,081,544 $1,019,340 $846,877 Rockledge Brevard $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,297 Titusville Brevard $519,829 $785,898 $719,662 $403,659 $666,161 Cooper City Broward $0 $0 $0 $0 $237,588 Coral Springs Broward $618,403 $1,318,522 .$898,487 $310,876 $450,530 Dania Beach Broward $19,493 $389,302 $176,350 $318,243 $313,597 Davie Broward $0 $281,711 $960,464 $617,337 $643,639 Deerfield Beach Broward $454,553 $1,235,673 $394,583 $175,569 $337,754 Fort Lauderdale Broward $10,008,111 $11,959,557 $11,218,639 $12,289,157 $12,219,507 Hallandale Beach Broward $190,365 $705,710 $324,917 $0 $455,613 Hollywood Broward $4,759,317 $3,458,774 $3,672,613 $3,043,706 $3,434,837 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $246,081 $0 $0 $0 $0 Lauderhill Broward $1,001,237 $0 $1,046,218 $0 $0 Margate Broward $466,312 $810,727 $427,748 $495,484 $476,809 Miramar Broward $844,482 $812,880 $579,096 $397,911 $448,726 North Lauderdale Broward $338,674 $272,782 $245,194 $240,385 $295,439 Oakland Park Broward $255,852 $581,729 $815,557 $115,158 $0 Pembroke Park Broward $0 $0 $0 $0 $308,700 Pembroke Pines Broward $874,716 $802,743 $995,353 $630,271 $598,333 Plantation Broward $690,061 $840,316 $308,156 $229,238 $467,328 Pompano Beach Broward $1,891,069 $1,198,576 $1,503,401 $2,408,922 $2,300,807 Sunrise Broward $803,331 $956,450 $747,486 $653,987 $520,436 Tamarac Broward $127,670 $145,001 $456,586 $359,136 $431,775 Crystal River Citrus $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,375 Naples Collier $45,656 $115,660 $0 $250,000 $0 Arcadia De Soto $0 $2,405 $0 $0 $0 Atlantic Beach Duval $0 $0 $0 $170,570 $0 Jacksonville Duval $14,463,113 $13,640,223 $12,102,454 $15,668,414 $16,119,235 Jacksonville Beach Duval $0 $0 $259,618 $203,500 $196,698 Neptune Beach Duval $0 $0 $0 $91,788 $0 Pensacola Escambia $1,933,944 $1,427,660 $2,357,649 $2,344,274 $2,004,519 Carrabelle Franklion $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Quint Gadsden $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,094 Fannin Springs Gilchrist $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,800 Wauchula Hardee $16,137 $2,839 $0 $0 $0 Plant City Hillsborou h $368,048 $529,725 $0 $620,749 $586,765 Tampa Hillsborough $13,344,967 $14,457,162 $11,668,523 $12,094,079 $12,541,718 Monticello Jefferson $0 $0 $0 $250,617 $0 146 1 1 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Housing and Urban Development Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Bonita Springs Lee $315,567 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cape Coral Lee $567,824 $934,224 $630,940 $538,125 $390,707 Fort Myers Lee $855,358 $918,289 $912,972 $582,684 $886,334 Fort Myers Beach Lee $49,257 $42,349 $33,534 $3,429 $0 Sanibel Lee $35,348 $0 $313,750 $18,463 $0 Tallahassee Leon $3,956,200 $4,257,242 $4,241,716 $2,996,724 $4,396,434 Bradenton Manatee $641,304 $442,319 $649,927 $601,224 $661,288 Ocala Marion $657,200 $598,113 $654,920 $716,904 $0 Florida City Miami-Dade $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Hialeah Miami-Dade $6,999,674 $11,410,274 $6,629,479 $7,278,350 $7,299,103 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Miami Miami-Dade $28,668,642 $53,577,190 $30,446,018 $27,470,128 $36,556,497 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0 $6,500,374 $4,007,144 $5,542,025 $5,702,684 North Miami Miami-Dade $2,588,250 $765,806 $567,151 $1,700,826 $1,767,646 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $122,421 $275,025 $129,048 $498,459 $9,633 O a-Locka Miami-Dade $34,731 $71,233 $0 $117,839 $0 South Miami Miami-Dade $187,000 $0 $209,369 $794,270 $417,768 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $57,667 $0 $0 $0 $0 West Miami Miami-Dade $0 $0 $134,096 $61,133 $97,496 Key West Monroe $371,565 $147,513 $297,420 $537,895 $589,718 Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $300,649 $199,283 $197,643 $205,054 $206,625 Orlando Orange $9,104,975 $5,224,309 $5,000,484 $8,475,184 $4,345,755 Winter Park Orange $0 $213,985 $0 $0 $0 Kissimmee Osceola $490,158 $0 $0 $0 $0 Saint Cloud Osceola $56,460 $0 $0 $0 $0 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0 $151,517 $123,587 $100,000 $407,809 Boca Raton Palm Beach $881,196 $708,937 $459,313 $465,310 $615,061 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $710,369 $478,275 $760,486 $617,216 $626,113 Delray Beach Palm Beach $716,872 $636,476 $319,109 $925,573 $585,611 Jupiter Palm Beach $33,181 $170,316 $47,778 $94,234 $0 Lake Worth Palm Beach $95,895 $34,400 $167,240 $0 $0 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $0 $210,178 $440,111 $554,336 $118,528 Royal Palm Beach Palm Beach $91,444 $0 $38,087 $0 $0 South Bay Palm Beach $0 $0 $0 $0 $734,832 West Palm Beach Palm Beach $6,879,028 $5,251,859 $5,542,469 $5,718,984 $4,246,132 Dade City Pasco $0 $0 $0 $36,526 $733,342 New Port Riche Pasco $641,984 $0 $0 $0 $0 Port Riche Pasco $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,603 Clearwater Pinellas $2,938,435 $1,053,725 $1,177,241 $1,098,457 $1,635,801 Dunedin Pinellas $0 $1,629,082 $0 $0 $0 Largo Pinellas $1,337,483 $1,352,325 $1,043,987 $1,810,623 $327,607 Madeira Beach Pinellas $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Oldsmar Pinellas $0 $0 $175,000 $0 $0 Pinellas Park Pinellas $70,473 $187,229 $455,050 $357,309 $40,171 Saint Petersburg Pinellas $5,470,235 $6,700,903 $5,831,653 $4,815,131 $7,121,035 Tar on Springs Pinellas $0 $219,429 $273,888 $181,380 $228,62 147 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Housing and Urban Development Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Treasure Island Pinellas $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bartow Polk $280,844 $0 $48,389 $139,065 $86,845 Dundee Polk $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,329 Eagle Lake Polk $96,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fort Meade Polk $0 $0 $81,291 $0 $0 Haines City Palk $0 $0 $0 $240,365 $61,255 Lake Alfred Polk $0 $0 $0 $22,393 $0 Lakeland Palk $740,690 $1,158,523 $1,255,537 $1,304,617 $1,335,743 Polk City Polk $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,587 Winter Haven Polk $718,321 $305,817 $0 $507,726 $340,336 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $1,788,057 $415,773 $627,706 $0 $0 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $228,356 $742,270 $0 $615,747 $554,294 Milton Santa Rosa $420,023 $22,576 $0 $0 $584,901 Sarasota Sarasota $5,293,092 $5,226,686 $3,290,218 $1,755,671 $2,876,895 Casselber Seminole $0 $0 $0 $281,605 $561,218 Oviedo Seminole $0 $0 $186,000 $57,686 $92,314 Sanford Seminole $438,416 $323,777 $465,787 $536,245 $166,365 Daytona Beach Volusia $1,394,614 $1,686,634 $2,193,738 $2,879,968 $1,400,042 Daytona Beach Shores Volusia $0 $0 $0 $50,830 $0 DeBary Volusia $0 $106,368 $0 $0 $0 Deland Volusia $867,421 $336,222 $302,559 $323,701 $324,884 Deltona Volusia $0 $443,515 $262,069 $404,622 $286,840 Holly Hill Volusia $0 $104,800 $433,669 $0 $12,000 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $217,141 $10,900 $150,900 $788,012 $85,865 Ormond Beach Volusia $156,582 $140,354 $122,810 $0 $205,447 Port Orange Volusia $179,051 $157,954 $120,301 $381750 $67,794 Statewide Total $147,151,080 $175,533,609 $136,549,506 $143,005,107 $149,171,714 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" hft ://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records 148 i Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Housing and Urban Development Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua Alachua $40.96 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Gainesville Alachua $24.61 $23.63 $22.92 $22.40 $24.48 Lynn Haven Bay $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $30.45 $22.02 Mexico Beach Bay $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Panama City Bay $22.49 $22.36 $19.72 $21.15 $9.79 Starke Bradford $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cocoa Brevard $51.37 $13.97 $32.80 $36.00 $27.87 Melbourne Brevard $13.32 $13.61 $11.51 $12.92 $14.00 Palm Bay Brevard $14.10 $12.59 $12.21 $11.99 $10.25 Rockledge Brevard $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.99 Titusville Brevard $11.81 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $16.19 Cooper City Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8.35 Coral Springs Broward $4.77 $10.39 $7.09 $2.50 $3.67 Dania Beach Broward $0.68 $13.59 $6.28 $11.67 $11.54 Davie Broward $0.00 $3.36 $11.74 $7.74 $8.18 Deerfield Beach Broward $6.01 $16.44 $6.06 $2.71 $5.21 Fort Lauderdale Broward $56.92 $69.80 $65.88 $72.64 $78.70 Hallandale Beach Broward $5.31 $19.76 $9.22 $0.00 $13.30 Hollywood Broward $33.22 $24.18 $25.68 $21.35 $24.35 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $7.65 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Lauderhill Broward $15.86 $0.00 $18.06 $0.00 $0.00 Margate Broward $8.43 $14.75 $7.86 $9.16 $8.84 Miramar Broward $7.65 $7.50 $5.69 $4.15 $5.13 North Lauderdale Broward $8.14 $6.67 $6.09 $7.19 $8.90 Oakland Park Broward $6.03 $18.29 $25.64 $3.63 $0.00 Pembroke Park Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $46.91 Pembroke Pines Broward $5.76 $5.31 $6.62 $4.25 $4.13 Plantation Broward $8.13 $9.87 $3.64 $2.73 $5.59 Pompano Beach Broward $18.70 $11.78 $17.24 $27.90 $26.66 Sunrise Broward $8.96 $10.66 $8.40 $7.48 $5.99 Tamarac Broward $2.15 $2.47 $7.91 $6.31 $7.65 Crystal River Citrus $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.68 Naples Collier $1.99 $5.14 $0.00 $11.19 $0.00 Arcadia De Soto $0.00 $0.36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Atlantic Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12.26 $0.00 Jacksonville Duval $17.33 $16.70 $15.20 $20.03 $21.05 Jacksonville Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $12.05 $9.62 $9.34 Neptune Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12.72 $0.00 Pensacola Escambia $35.14 $26.04 $41.83 $41.63 $35.62 Carrabelle Franklion $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Quincy Gadsden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.50 Fannin Springs Gilchrist $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.21 Wauchula Hardee $3.62 $0.69 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Plant City Hillsborough $11.21 $16.35 $0.00 $19.50 $18.50 Tampa Hillsborough $40.33 $44.28 $36.05 $38.00 $40.21 Monticello Jefferson $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $98.94 $0.00 1 149 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Housing and Urban Development Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending Sept mber 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Bonita Springs Lee $7.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cape Coral Lee $3.68 $6.66 $4.77 $4.47 $3.45 Fort Myers Lee $13.01 $14.95 $15.8 $11.09 $17.27 Fort Myers Beach Lee $7.17 $6.1$ $4.83. $0.50 $0.00 Sanibel Lee $5.59 $0.00 $49.53 $2.97 $0.00 Tallahassee Leon $22.44 $24.36 $25.08 $18.46 $28.06 Bradenton Manatee $11.68 $8.15 $12.36 $11.52 $13.24 Ocala Marion $12.67 $12.10 $13.83 $15.21 $0.00 Florida City_ Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hialeah Miami-Dade $30.65 $49.52 $28.38 $31.19 $31.56 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Miami Miami-Dade $73.25 $138.48 $80.22 $73.66 $99.75 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0.00 $69.50 $43.77 $61.25 $64.10 North Miami Miami-Dade $43.33 $12.70 $9.44 $28.31 $29.46 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $3.01 $6.69 $3.05 $11.82 $0.23 O a-Locks Miami-Dade $2.24 $4.61 $0.00 $7.56 $0.00 South Miami Miami-Dade $17.76 $0.00 $19.22 $73.76 $38.83 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $4.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 West Miami Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $21.87 $9.92 $16.31 Key West Monroe $14.68 $5.56 $11.35 $20.84 $22.81 Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $14.40 $9.61 $9.59 $10.00 $10.21 Orlando Orange $40.64 $24.01 $23.94 $41.99 $22.30 Winter Park Orange $0.00 $7.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Kissimmee Osceola $8.14 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Saint Cloud Osceola $1.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0.00 $10.11 $8.26 '$6.72 $27.43 Boca Raton Palm Beach $10.31 $8.31 $5.75 $6.12 $8.14 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $10.59 $7.29 $11.66 $9.56 $9.96 Delray Beach Palm Beach $11.18 $9.96 $5.03 $14.79 $9.52 Jupiter Palm Beach $0.66 $3.53 $1.04 $2.14 $0.00 Lake Worth Palm Beach $2.63 $0.95 $4.70 $0.00 $0.00 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $0.00 $6.32 $13.37 $17.75 $3.82 Ro al Palm Beach Palm Beach $3.01 $0.00 $1.30 $0.00 $0.00 South Bay Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $186.79 West Palm Beach Palm Beach $63.92 $51.94 $56.72 $63.04 $49.26 Dade City Pasco $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5.64 $114.71 New Port Riche Pasco $38.57 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Port Riche Pasco $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $55.44 Clearwater Pinellas $26.57 $9.51 $10.67 $9.98 $14.91 Dunedin Pinellas $0.00 $43.53 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Largo Pinellas $17.63 $18.06 $14.34 $25.23 $4.66 Madeira Beach Pinellas $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $22.12 Oldsmar Pinellas $0.00 $0.00 $12.74 $0.00 $0.00 Pinellas Park Pinellas $1.44 $3.87 $9.57 $7.66 $0.86 Saint Petersbur Pinellas $21.52 $26.39 $23.05 $19.09 $28.44 Tar on Springs Pinellas $0.00 $9.27 $11.82 $7.95 $10.24 150 1 1 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Housing and Urban Development Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending Sept mber 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Coun 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Treasure Island Pinellas $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Bartow Polk $17.36 $0.00 $3.08 $8.98 $5.65 Dundee Polk $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6.24 Eagle Lake Polk $36.46 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Meade Polk $0.00 $0.00 $13.95 $0.00 $0.00 Haines City Polk $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17.03 $4.45 Lake Alfred Polk $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5.62 $0.00 Lakeland Polk $8.08 $12.75 $13.99 $14.70 $15.62 Polk City Polk $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4.86 Winter Haven Palk $22.86 $10.65 $0.00 $18.90 $12.80 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $43.50 $10.78 $16.08 $0.00 $0.00 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $1.58 $5.75 $0.00 $5.97 $5.75 Milton Santa Rosa $54.63 $3.00 $0.00 $0.00 $80.89 Sarasota Sarasota $95.61 $95.29 $60.22 $32.25 $53.34 Casselber Seminole $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.52 $23.28 Oviedo Seminole $0.00 $0.00 $6.21 $1.99 $3.30 Sanford Seminole $8.56 $6.57 $10.11 $12.04 $3.85 Daytona Beach Volusia $21.46 $25.90 $33.71 $44.38 $21.56 Daytona Beach Shores Volusia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.26 $0.00 DeBa Volusia $0.00 $5.84 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Deland Volusia $32.69 $13.42 $12.70 $14.13 $14.56 Deltona Volusia $0.00 $5.35 $3.27 $5.30 $3.89 Holly Hill Volusia $0.00 $8.30 $34.39 $0.00 $0.96 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $9.50 $0.49 $7.07 $38.26 $4.22 Ormond Beach Volusia $3.89 $3.54 $3.15 $0.00 $5.46 Port Orange Volusia $3.19 $2.89 $2.26 $0.76 $1.39 Statewide Average $11.48 $14.91 $14.55 $16.07 $19.45 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" http://harvester. census.gov/sac/d issem/accessoptions. html?su bmit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 1 151 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Health and Human Services Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $22,472 $16,000 $16,000 $137,683 $80,741 Bay $10,872 $0 $0 $0 $0 Brevard $88,246 $245,412 $2,716,520 $400,372 $0 Broward $18,377,170 $16,208,562 $17,211,668 $15,766,139 $13,418,109 Charlotte $64,123 $94,013 $68,250 $0 $0 Citrus $306,983 $202,208 $205,174 $213,717 $50,169 Collier $78,791 $15,503 $78,795 $160,171 $11,732 Dixie $2,175 $0 $0 $0 $0 Escambia $353,761 $311,678 $368,253 $699,509 $742,726 Fla ler $31,295 $34,992 $8,743 $0 $0 Gilchrist $478 $0 $0 $0 $0 Hillsborough $31,080,156 $32,152,813 $30,384,382 $32,649,265 $30,523,194 Holmes $1,676 $175 $0 $0 $0 Indian River $12,537 $0 $0 $0 $0 Jefferson $3,250 $7,000 $0 $19,000 $0 Lake $675,827 $136,214 $0 $0 $0 Lee $26,865 $0 $0 $0 $46,908 Leon $0 $0 $226,702 $262,772 $552,715 Liberty $0 $0 $3,357 $0 $0 Manatee $589,385 $1,997,620 $253,868 $182,048 $131,367 Miami-Dade $75,486,553 $85,251,979 $80,514,107 $91,073,222 $81,848,673 Monroe $53,656 $57,475 $44,473 $108,215 $20,024 Nassau $246,531 $277,882 $193,111 $0 $0 Okaloosa $0 $11,054 $0 $0 $1,461 Okeechobee $0 $16,005 $34,666 $25,756 $9,109 Orange $20,303,388 $19,347,802 $21,728,039 $19,565,634 $22,706,686 Osceola $303,925 $328,583 $438,357 $317,274 $283,958 Palm Beach $22,583,142 $23,517,515 $24,762,415 $23,869,090 $21,834,131 Pasco $772,721 $2,343,942 $0 $1,662,096 $698,796 Pinellas $2,172,658 $6,416,182 $2,967,278 $2,247,458 $0 Polk $3,632,714 $2,748,273 $1,768,056 $1,720,813 $168,325 Putnam $696 $0 $0 $0 $0 Saint Johns $578,950 $625,646 $328,640 $0 $0 Saint Lucie $0 $306,406 $0 $0 $0 Santa Rosa $45,676 $33,879 $32,353 $26,333 $0 Sarasota $409,152 $16,636 $0 $0 $0 Seminole $1,672,234 $2,218,112 $1,488,955 $2,592,703 $0 Sumter $6,590 $0 $0 $0 $0 Volusia $13,974 $1,829,955 $2,384,264 $2,306,958 $6,464,244 Wakulla $0 $2,506 $0 $0 $0 Statewide Total $180,008,622 $196,772,022 $188,226,426 $196,006,228 $179,593,068 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" hft ://harvester.censuq. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions,htmI?submit=Retrieve+Records 152 [1, 1 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Health and Human Services Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $0.09 $0.07 $0.07 $0.60 $0.35 Bay $0.07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Brevard $0.16 $0.46 $5.21 $0.79 $0.00 Broward $10.48 $9.31 $9.99 $9.28 $8.04 Charlotte $0.40 $0.61 $0.43 $0.00 $0.00 Citrus $2.24 $1.52 $1.59 $1.70 $0.41 Collier $0.24 $0.05 $0.26 $0.55 $0.04 Dixie $0.14 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Escambia $1.14 $1.03 $1.20 $2.31 $2.48 Fla ler $0.35 $0.45 $0.13 $0.00 $0.00 Gilchrist $0.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hillsborough $26.69 $28.41 $27.41 $30.24 -$28.92 Holmes $0.09 $0.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Indian River $0.09 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Jefferson $0.23 $0.49 $0.00 $1.40 $0.00 Lake $2.44 $0.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Lee $0.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.10 Leon $0.00 $0.00 $0.86 $1.03 $2.23 Liberty $0.00 $0.00 $0.46 $0.00 $0.00 Manatee $1.91 $6.56 $0.86 $0.63 $0.47 Miami-Dade $30.97 $35.20 $33.83 $38.82 $35.39 Monroe $0.67 $0.70 $0.55 $1.34 $0.25 Nassau $3.62 $4.23 $2.97 $0.00 $0.00 Okaloosa $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.01 Okeechobee $0.00 $0.42 $0.91 $0.69 $0.25 Orange $18.81 $18.54 $21.43 $19.90 $23.76 Osceola $1.19 $1.40 $1.94 $1.51 $1.47 Palm Beach $17.53 $18.58 $19.93 $19.70 $18.45 Pasco $1.82 $5.76 $0.00 $4.43 $1.93 Pinellas $2.29 $6.77 $3.14 $2.39 $0.00 Polk $6.43 $5.07 $3.35 $3.36 $0.34 Putnam $0.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Saint Johns $3.50 $3.98 $2.20 $0.00 $0.00 Saint Lucie $0.00 $1.28 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Santa Rosa $0.32 $0.25 $0.24 $0.20 $0.00 Sarasota $1.08 $0.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Seminole $3.98 $5.39 $3.69 $6.57 $0.00 Sumter $0.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Volusia $0.03 $3.70 $4.92 $4.90 $14.06 Wakulla $0.00 $0.09 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Statewide Average $4 $4.73 $4.34 $4.48 $4.09 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" http://harvester.census.gov/sac/dissem/accessoptions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 153 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Health and Human Services Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2001 - 2005 Municipality Count 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Gainesville Alachua $416,455 $156,523 $538,222 $0 $0 Deerfield Beach Broward $0 $0 $0 $169,056 $168,171 Fort Lauderdale Broward $0 $0 $0 $215,496 $139,181 Pembroke Pines Broward $73,865 $93,215 $93,215 $0 $0 Jacksonville Duval $6,692,187 $6,290,967 $6,834,197 $6,161,549 $821,053 Quincy Gadsden $0 $0 $0 $0 $930 Avon Park Highlands $0 $64,750 $0 $0 $0 Tallahassee Leon $0 $17,617 $1,284 $Q $0 Homestead Miami-Dade $50,306 $13,355 $0 $0 $0 Miami Miami-Dade $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,222,795 Orlando Orange $75,769 $58,351 $7,072 $0 $0 Saint Petersbur Pinnellas $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Welaka Putnam $98,206 $0 $0 $0 $0 Statewide Total $7,308,582 $6,694,778 $7,473,990 $6,546,101 $2,352,130 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" hft ://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.htmI?submit=Retrieve+Records 154 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Health and Human Services Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipali County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Gainesville Alachua $3.44 $1.31 $4.57 $0.00 $0.00 Deerfield Beach Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.61 $2.60 Fort Lauderdale Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.27 $0.90 Pembroke Pines Broward $0.49 $0.62 $0.62 $0.00 $0.00 Jacksonville Duval $0.00 $7.70 $8.59 $7.88 $1.07 Quirm Gadsden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.13 Avon Park Highlands $0.00 $7.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Tallahassee Leon $0.00 $0.10 $0.01 $0.00 $0.00 Homestead Miami-Dade $1.17 $0.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Miami Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3.34 Orlando Orange $0.34 $0.27 $0.03 $0.00 $0.00 Saint Petersburg Pinnellas $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Welaka Putnam $157.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Statewide Averag e $1.36 $2.53 $2.76 $3.92 $1.61 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" http://harvester.census.gov/sac/d issem/accessoptions. htm I?submit=Retrieve+ Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 155 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Transportation Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Fndinn RPnfPmhPr'IA 9AA9 . 9AAR Coun 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Brevard $4,038,079 $3,592,479 $4,332,629 $4,579,810 $3,001,498 Broward $14,909,788 $24,786,096 $24,051,388 $28,023,172 $26,244,926 Charlotte $100,883 $636,485 $662,187 $460,515 $474,999 Citrus $918,820 $293,719 $103,341 $160,531 $158,616 Collier $1,504,595 $1,513,798 $1,098,621 $902,882 $822,151 DeSoto $36,666 $0 $17,770 $9,625 $11,437 Dixie $51,775 $181,098 $92,700 $164,329 $150,000 Escambia $3,703,190 $1,838,048 $2,556,234 $1,947,177 $2,561,655 Fla ler $407,349 $266,914 $937,934 $295,866 $0 Franklin $0 $145,029 $0 $0 $0 Hernando $1,522,983 $1,043,378 $670,675 $1,326,010 $255,789 Hillsborough $447,034 $856,449 $538,819 $427,575 $474,214 Indian River $1,021,749 $1,199,581 $715,452 $740,746 $802,506 Lake $192,377 $190,589 $261,361 $145,550 $291,205 Lee $16,267,225 $9,087,920 $20,811,831 $22,910,702 $11,457,417 Leon $0 $0 $0 $80,945 $51,591 Lev $253,424 $62,842 $57,375 $13,987 $12,407 Libeq $25,000 $53,859 $16,473 $16,000 $16,000 Manatee $2,199,324 $1,661,429 $3,115,240 $932,512 $3,435,448 Martin $4,281,904 $725,095 $848,636 $1,348,673 $1,019,307 Miami-Dade $971,861 $824,174 $975,603 $847,663 $82,607,472 Monroe $7,221,986 $6,615,900 $3,485,718 $3,670,362 $3,171,204 Okaloosa $3,060,915 $3,276,627 $17,658,010 $3,297,392 $1,488,408 Okeechobee $0 $213,521 $0 $4,770 $22,029 Palm Beach $17,898,824 $18,781,060 $21,889,666 $17,812,669 $19,520,460 Pasco $2,185,472 $860,452 $1,517,271 $854,433 $1,471,316 Pinellas $9,963,268 $3,337,332 $787,464 $9,111,845 $2,552,413 Polk $4,204,941 $5,926,885 $5,032,709 $4,713,135 $4,944,164 Putnam $0 $265,000 $0 $0 $0 Saint Johns $860,297 $366,646 $0 $0 $0 Saint Lucie $2,497,063 $1,533,170 $781,347 $1,747,179 $2,378,086 Santa Rosa $802,787 $139,857 $96,085 $151,829 $115,074 Sarasota $968,684 $2,398,357 $4,198,436 $3,221,248 $1,963,723 Sumter $118,805 $109,358 $108,931 $101,253 $139,635 Suwannee $52,026 $109,154 $158,300 $117,597 $57,803 Ta for $0 $424,313 $0 $0 $0 Volusia $15,600,968 $9,019,886 $6,386,434 $10,735,242 $10,814,472 Statewide Total $118,290,062 $102,336,500 $123,964,640 $120,873,224 $182,487,425 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" http://harvester.census.oov/sac/dissem/accessor)tions.htmI?submit=Retrieve+ 156 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Transportation Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Brevard $7.44 $6.75 $8.31 $9.02 $6.07 Broward $8.50 $14.24 $13.96 $16.50 $15.72 Charlotte $0.63 $4.13 $4.22 $3.03 $3.20 Citrus $6.72 $2.21 $0.80 $1.28 $1.29 Collier $4.61 $4.76 $3.59 $3.09 $2.96 DeSoto $1.11 $0.00 $0.52 $0.29 $0.35 Dixie $3.30 $11.78 $6.21 $11.19 $10.37 Escambia $11.96 $6.05 $8.32 $6.42 $8.55 Fla ler $4.57 $3.40 $13.46 $4.81 $0.00 Franklin $0.00 $13.37 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hernando $9.70 $6.92 $4.62 $9.43 $1.87 Hillsborough $0.38 $0.76 $0.49 $0.40 $0.45 Indian River $7.55 $9.22 $5.64 $6.11 $6.79 Lake $0.70 $0.72 $1.04 $0.60 $1.26 Lee $27.78 $16.54 $39.93 $46.28 $24.12 Leon $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.32 $0.21 Lev $6.50 $1.65 $1.53 $0.38 $0.34 Liberty $3.22 $7.10 $2.24 $2.21 $2.24 Manatee $7.13 $5.46 $10.55 $3.25 $12.39 Martin $30.02 $5.14 $6.17 $10.03 $7.78 Miami-Dade $0.40 $0.34 $0.41 $0.36 $35.72 Monroe $89.70 $80.28 $42.91 $45.57 $39.08 Okaloosa $15.89 $17.34 $95.05 $18.21 $8.41 Okeechobee $0.00 $5.65 $0.00 $0.13 $0.60 Palm Beach $13.90 $14.84 $18.07 $14.70 $16.50 Pasco $5.15 $2.11 $4.04 $2.28 $4.07 Pinellas $10.51 $3.52 $0.83 $9.69 $2.73 Polk $7.44 $10.94 $9.52 $9.21 $9.84 Putnam $0.00 $3.59 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Saint Johns $5.20 $2.33 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Saint Lucie $9.63 $6.39 $3.45 $8.25 $11.69 Santa Rosa $5.68 $1.03 $0.72 $1.18 $0.92 Sarasota $2.55 $6.52 $11.72 $9.24 $5.78 Sumter $1.44 $1.48 $1.64 $1.61 $2.28 Suwannee $1.34 $2.86 $4.20 $3.16 $1.62 Taylor $0.00 $19.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Volusia $30.96 $18.23 $13.19 $22.80 $23.52 Statewide Average $ 9.48 $ 8.58 $ 24.12 $ 7.59 $ 7.26 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt ://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 157 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Transportation Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Gainesville Alachua $3,542,895 $3,719,363 $1,906,256 $2,363,953 $2,746,637 Melbourne Brevard $1,684,531 $1,766,019 $2,646,840 $1,645,154 $3,268,502 Fort Lauderdale Broward $1,082,391 $1,737,473 $4,379,354 $309,817 $2,174,922 Lake City Columbia $0 $0 $516,158 $533,322 $0 Jacksonville Duval $0 -$5,003 $296,132 $368,829 $0 Pensacola Escambia $10,682,044 $1,686,404 $1,868,728 $2,018,525 $1,242,716 Wauchula Hardee $39,582 $10,795 $98,506 $12,614 $0 Avon Park Highlands $0 $224,547 $98,745 $13,365 $1,286,752 Plant City Hillsborough $0 $0 $0 $292,053 $380,299 Sebastian Indian River $0 $1,702,522 $731,531 $662,556 $0 Vero Beach Indian River $0 $842,092 $3,098,467 $2,171,118 $1,592,903 Marianna Jackson $31,226 $31,989 $143,493 $169,795 $97,940 Leesburg Lake $189,798 $456,464 $44,978 $901,198 $13,094 Tallahassee Leon $7,982,738 $9,658,208 $8,064,419 $9,514,594 $6,125,229 Williston Lev $0 $145,646 $154,080 $0 $0 Ocala Marion $3,775,280 $2,243,784 $1,125,816 $738,980 $766,718 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0 $0 $0 $185,151 $548,117 North Miami Miami-Dade $0 $0 $1,076,622 $123,378 $18,875 Key West Monroe $557,338 $286,556 $262,442 $1,985,152 $152,017 Fernandina Beach Nassau $1,590 $1,851,886 $668,102 $979,064 $0 Kissimmee Osceola $461,651 $2,116,952 $997,926 $255,524 $970,771 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0 $33,557 $0 $0 $0 Port Riche Pasco $0 $500,840 $0 $27,588 $51,365 Saint Petersburg Pinellas $328,478 $145,639 $76,787 $182,971 $417,008 Bartow Polk $0 $0 $457,390 $0 $0 Lakeland Polk $3,243,422 $1,279,228 $636,200 $0 $734,652 Winter Haven Polk $226,241 $75,463 $0 $151,929 $171,888 Palatka Putnam $1,330,600 $605,505 $519,933 $0 $0 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Venice Sarasota $2,145,165 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 Deland Volusia $185,442 $471 $145,064 $72,144 $63,180 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $394,993 $265,742 $69,138 $144,239 $563,016 Ormond Beach Volusia $257,904 $433,322 $110,517 $0 $43,200 DeFuniak Spriggs Walton $602,480 $27,866 $0 $0 $0 Statewide Total $38,745,789 $31,843,330 $30,643,624 $25,823,013 $23,429,801 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt ://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records 158 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Transportation Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Gainesville Alachua $29.30 $31.02 $16.19 $20.17 $27.96 Melbourne Brevard $21.95 $23.53 $35.46 $22.35 $44.89 Fort Lauderdale Broward $6.16 $10.14 $25.72 $1.83 $14.01 Lake Ci Columbia $0.00 $0.00 $48.43 $50.07 $0.00 Jacksonville Duval $0.00 -$0.01 $0.37 $0.47 $0.00 Pensacola Escambia $194.10 $30.76 $33.15 $35.85 $22.08 Wauchula Hardee $8.89 $2.63 $22.36 $2.92 $0.00 Avon Park Highlands $0.00 $25.58 $11.26 $1.55 $150.22 Plant City Hillsborough $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9.17 $11.99 Sebastian Indian River $0.00 $84.92 $37.78 $36.25 $0.00 Vero Beach Indian River $0.00 $47.06 $172.02 $120.99 $88.90 Marianna Jackson $4.76 $4.93 $22.27 $26.60 $15.60 Leesburg Lake $10.07 $26.13 $2.70 $55.32 $0.81 Tallahassee Leon $45.27 $55.26 $47.68 $58.62 $39.09 Williston Le $0.00 $59.96 $66.21 $0.00 $0.00 Ocala Marion $72.81 $45.38 $23.77 $15.68 $16.51 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.05 $6.16 North Miami Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $17.91 $2.05 $0.31 Key West Monroe $22.01 $10.80 $10.01 $76.91 $5.88 Fernandina Beach Nassau $0.13 $159.36 $57.89 $8 6.18 $0.00 Kissimmee Osceola $7.66 $36.36 $17.87 $ 4.84 $19.04 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 Port Riche Pasco $0.00 $157.15 $0.00 $ 8.79 $16.69 Saint Petersburg Pinellas $1.29 $0.57 $0.30 $ 0.73 $1.67 Bartow Palk $0.00 $0.00 $29.12 $ 0.00 $0.00 Lakeland Polk $35.40 $14.08 $7.09 $ 0.00 $8.59 Winter Haven Polk $7.20 $2.63 $0.00 $ 5.65 $6.46 Palatka Putnam $116.55 $54.29 $48.05 $ 0.00 $0.00 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 Venice Sarasota $99.39 $0.00 $22.46 $ 0.00 $0.00 Deland Volusia $6.99 $0.02 $6.09 $3.15 $2.83 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $17.28 $12.07 $3.24 $7.00 $27.67 Ormond Beach Volusia $6.40 $10.92 $2.83 $0.00 $1.15 DeFuniak Springs Walton $111.84 $5.17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Statewide Average $ 35.03 $ 29.19 $ 26.21 $ 24.02 $ 21.01 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" hftp://harvester.census.gov/sac/dissem/accessoptions. html?su bmit=Retrieve+ Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 159 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $536,153 $516,742 $427,221 $692,175 $612,468 Baker $102,403 $4,702 $0 $0 $56,294 Bay $157,885 $109,454 $146,520 $153,673 $71,578 Bradford $0 $3,692 $0 $0 $0 Brevard $493,944 $886,722 $1,801,752 $1,084,811 $583,735 Broward $1,803,363 $1,851,242 $1,444,034 $1,972,549 $2,118,317 Calhoun $1,000 $26,830 $3,790 $0 $0 Charlotte $89,963 $292,305 $57,256 $77,058 $0 Citrus $111,053 $33,693 $48,239 $980,874 $327,242 Clay $244,910 $68,399 $290,457 $2,064,390 $1,286,545 Collier $692,485 $2,349,286 $2,027,555 $2,202,393 $2,349,006 Columbia $0 $0 $0 $37,329 $44,667 Desoto $216,271 $0 $169,938 $108,076 $111,054 Dixie $0 $62,793 $75,208 $74,434 $39,110 Escambia $557,091 $269,439 $590,528 $529,451 $699,720 Fla ler $135,216 $50,000 $148,021 $325,124 $122,651 Franklin $0 $9,549 $55,796 $9,631 $0 Gadsen $249,468 $45,940 $119,978 $199,058 $209,202 Gilchrist $28,920 $0 $0 $0 $9,955 Glades $185,184 $86,043 $589,373 $0 $0 Gulf $68,542 $0 $0 $16,591 $11,014 Hamilton $79,489 $0 $0 $0 $0 Hardee $38,104 $5,104 $12,455 $0 $60,959 Hernando $498,611 $425,576 $200,150 $1157973 $130,508 Highlands $118,450 $7,890 $36,478 $41,749 $116,080 Hillsborough $2,619,299 $1,659,323 $1,962,922 $2,324,881 $2,324,892 Holmes $58,856 $95,990 $119,145 $65,348 $139,169 Indian River $52,727 $24,799 $36,383 $98,457 $146,345 Jackson $84,175 $211,845 $121,017 $182,077 $113,231 Jefferson $148,614 $183,516 $0 $14,174 $0 Lake $704,646 $88,492 $191,534 $305,451 $717,701 Lee $756,556 $344,322 $5527561 $720,095 $520,634 Leon $385,053 $275,127 $390,856 $281,280 $218,737 Lev $115,745 $112,021 $11,781 $64,427 $69,366 Liberty $31,394 $0 $60,479 $2,841 $3,742 Madison $879 $0 $0 $0 $0 Manatee $149,691 $582,529 $882,669 $603,359 $493,987 Marion $768,664 $448,383 $933,566 $917,176 $650,801 Martin $0 $30,050 $67,496 $148,335 $272,920 Miami-Dade $3,786,056 $1,662,430 $3,137,619 $7,133,808 $6,077,516 Monroe $219,085 $108,287 $256,422 $17,250,807 $189,372 Nassau $91,221 $58,652 $9,625 $0 $26,497 Okaloosa $178,134 $408,997 $434,291 $244,296 $294,038 Okeechobee $0 $16,877 $16,336 $111,070 $284,318 Orange $3,530,583 $3,632,683 $3,356,497 $5,398,204 $5,073,676 Osceola $150,080 $215,528 $342,433 $444,400 $1,238,251 Palm Beach $1,932,697 $2,272,322 $1,436,488 $1,666,951 $1,593,933 160 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 County____ 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Pasco $371,727 $306,897 $1,192,096 $923,393 $1,503,254 Pinellas $1,682,517 $3,138,993 $2,848,861 $3,545,724 $3,995,918 Polk $2,080,928 $739,462 $1,473,233 $1,712,995 $1,117,055 Putnam $365,960 $312,928 $277,474 $266,156 $291,504 Saint Johns $370,039 $771,141 $771,857 $633,201 $470,672 Saint Lucie $708,728 $847,173 $458,814 $228,072 $119,882 Santa Rosa $623,149 $631,904 $864,410 $537,239 $499,235 Sarasota $535,996 $445,699 $406,396 $471,052 $982,695 Seminole $801,639 $1,416,589 $915,537 $793,968 $706,055 Sumter $38,431 $29,320 $4,141 $33,584 $132,209 Suwannee $103,950 $170,297 $117,661 $23,695 $100,807 Taylor $0 $4,085 $0 $0 $0 Union $0 $0 $11,135 $0 $60,955 Volusia $469,403 $508,890 $592,522 $668,033 $644,080 Wakulla $0 $23,532 $3,530 $67,552 $289,764 Walton $118,023 $8,588 $0 $0 $0 Washington $44,801 $20,973 $3,060 $30,803 $5,145 Statewide Total $30,487,951 $28,914,045_ [_$32,505,596 $58,598,243 $40,328,461 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accessa tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records 161 . Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua $ 2.20 $2.15 $1.81 $2.99 $ 2.68 Baker $ 4.10 $0.20 $0.00 $0.00 $ 2.45 Bay $ 0.95 $0.68 $0.92 $0.99 $ 0.47 Bradford $ 0.00 $ 0.13 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Brevard $ 0.91 $ 1.67 $3.46 $2.14 $ 1.18 Broward $ 1.03 $ 1.06 $0.84 $1.16 $ 1.27 Calhoun $ 0.07 $ 1.92 $0.28 $0.00 $ 0.00 Charlotte $ 0.56 $ 1.90 $0.36 $0.51 $ 0.00 Citrus $ 0.81 $ 0.25 $0.37 $7.80 $ 2.66 Clay $ 1.38 $ 0.40 $1.78 $13.23 $ 8.58 Collier $ 2.12 $ 7.39 $6.62 $7.53 $ 8.47 Columbia $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.63 $ 0.77 Desoto $ 6.52 $ 0.00 $4.98 $3.21 $ 3.39 Dixie $ 0.00 $ 4.08 $5.04 $5.07 $ 2.70 Escambia $ 1.80 $ 0.89 $1.92 $1.75 $ 2.34 Flagler $ 1.52 $ 0.64 $2.12 $5.28 $ 2.16 Franklin $ 0.00 $ 0.88 $5.24 $0.92 $ 0.00 Gadsen $ 5.18 $ 0.96 $2.56 $4.28 $ 4.56 Gilchrist $ 1.73 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.66 Glades $1 7.15 $ 8.02 $54.91 $0.00 $ 0.00 Gulf $4.15 $ 0.00 $0.00 $1.06 $ 0.72 Hamilton $5.48 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Hardee $1.40 $ 0.19 $0.45 $0.00 $ 2.22 Hernando $3.18 $ 2.82 $1.38 $0.82 $ 0.96 Highlands $1.23 $ 0.08 $0.40 $0.46 $ 1.30 Hillsborough $2.25 $ 1.47 $1.77 $2.15 $ 2.20 Holmes $3.02 $ 5.01 $6.27 $3.45 $ 7.44 Indian River $0.39 $ 0.19 $0.29 $0.81 $ 1.24 Jackson $1.68 $ 4.26 $2.48 $3.72 $ 2.37 Jefferson $1 0.35 $1 2.89 $0.00 $1.05 $ 0.00 Lake $2.55 $0.34 $0.76 $1.27 $ 3.11 Lee $1.29 $0.63 $1.06 $1.45 $ 1.10 Leon $1.41 $1.01 $1.48 $1.10 $0.88 Lev $2.97 $2.95 $0.31 $1.76 $1.93 Liberty $4.04 $0.00 $8.22 $0.39 $0.52 Madison $0.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Manatee $0.49 $1.91 $2.99 $2.10 $1.78 Marion $2.44 $1.47 $3.18 $3.25 $2.40 Martin $0.00 $0.21 $0.49 $1.10 $2.08 Miami-Dade $1.55 $0.69 $1.32 $3.04 $2.63 Monroe $2.72 $1.31 $3.16 $214.20 $2.33 Nassau $1.34 $0.89 $0.15 $0.00 $0.43 Okaloosa $0.92 $2.16 $2.34 $1.35 $1.66 Okeechobee $0.00 $0.45 $0.43 $2.98 $7.78 Orange $3.27 $3.48 $3.31 $5.49 $5.31 Osceola $0.59 $0.92 $1.52 $2.11 $6.40 Palm Beach $1.50 $1.80 $1.16 $1.38 $1.35 162 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by County Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Pasco $0.88 $0.75. $3.06 $2.46 $4.16 Pinellas $1.77 $3.31 $3.02 $3.77 $4.28 Polk $3.68 $1.36 $2.79 $3.35 $2.22 Putnam $4.92 $4.24 $3.79 $3.70 $4.09 Saint Johns $2.24 $4.90 $5.17 $4.53 $3.51 Saint Lucie $2.73 $3.53 $2.03 $1.08 $0.59 Santa Rosa $4.41 $4.63 $6.46 $4.17 $4.00 Sarasota $1.41 $1.21 $1.13 $1.35 $2.89 Seminole $1.91 $3.44 $2.27 $2.01 $1.82 Sumter $0.47 $0.40 $0.06 $0.53 $2.16 Suwannee $2.68 $4.46 $3.12 $0.64 $2.82 Taylor $0.00 $0.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Union $0.00 $0.00 $0.76 $0.00 $4.42 Volusia $0.93 $1.03 $1.22 $1.42 $1.40 Wakulla $0.00 $0.88 $0.14 $2.71 $11.97 Walton $2.12 $0.16 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Washington $1.94 $0.91 $0.14 $1.41 $0.24 Statewide Average $2.19 $1.87 $2.79 $5.60 $2.50 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt ://harvester.census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 163 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua Alachua $97,971 $4,264 $19,540 $3,221 $0 Archer Alachua $0 $361 $0 $0 $0 Gainesville Alachua $1,052,156 $719,039 $517,461 $1,049,163 $529,234 High Springs Alachua $0 $0 $4,257 $3,888 $0 Lynn Haven Bay $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 Mexico Beach Bay $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Panama City Bay $52,766 $117,190 $111,024 $97,450 $215,854 Panama City Beach Bay $0 $8,744 $11,261 $13,916 $22,149 S ringfield Bay $0 $4,233 $12,400 $17,538 $14,236 Starke Bradford $3,535 $3,550 $0 $0 $0 Cocoa Brevard $100,306 $60,484 $129,355 $30,845 $88,411 Cocoa Beach Brevard $0 $9,216 $150,000 $0 $0 Melbourne Brevard $46,842 $209,632 $334,022 $184,911 $198,552 Palm Bay Brevard $32,623 $54,650 $216,772 $198,638 $176,836 Rockledge Brevard $0 $7,080 $0 $0 $29,088 Satellite Beach Brevard $3,305 $0 $0 $3,798 $0 Titusville Brevard $87,393 $33,107 $50,044 $89,805 $91,785 Cooper Cit Broward $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,101 Coral Springs Broward $64,817 $37,509 $77,060 $201,391 $285,997 Dania Beach Broward $18,606 $39,160 $41,283 $0 $84,465 Davie Broward $0 $308,025 $182,051 $76,146 $412,538 Deerfield Beach Broward $28,157 $58,725 $24,089 $40,812 $72,946 Fort Lauderdale Broward $248,299 $190,865 $499,719 $1,150,541 $1,553,359 Hallandale Beach Broward $17,366 $39,340 $105,094 $125,569 $194,536 Hollywood Broward $493,190 $366,106 $512,835 $459,162 $938,401 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $16,735 $0 $0 $0 $0 Lauderhill Broward $0 $0 $77,951 $0 $0 Margate Broward $32,965 $27,179 $46,904 $123,589 $180,651 Miramar Broward $89,473 $329,593 $415,703 $389,482 $402,656 North Lauderdale Broward $0 $64,504 $111,830 $130,087 $40,309 Oakland Park Broward $27,806 $40,167 $99,968 $0 $190,604 Parkland Broward $0 $0 $26,997 $0 $0 Pembroke Pines Broward $101,968 $130,102 $181,640 $191,964 $340,251 Plantation Broward $27,123 $0 $86,040 $97,110 $37,103 Pompano Beach Broward $191,381 $51,006 $262,987 $180,860 $500,989 Sunrise Broward $157,312 $293,502 $245,011 $264,305 $416,700 Tamarac Broward $11,320 $13,732 $20,649 $255,693 $142,977 Weston Broward $0 $0 $11,364 $0 $0 Wilton Manors Broward $0 $0 $104,103 $0 $0 Blountstown Calhoun $994 $40,691 $0 $48,288 $0 C stal River Citrus $0 $8,288 $10,537 $0 $27,730 Green Cove Springs Clay $0 $0 $7,710 $10,094 $11,688 Marco Island Collier $32,642 $0 $149,227 $0 $0 Naples Collier $10,000 $0 $4,220 $89,582 $0 Lake City Columbia $0 $0 $49,200 $56,391 $0 Arcadia De. Sots $0 $4,005 $0 $21,835 $0 Cross Cit Dixie $0 $1,091 $2,570 $27,327 $1,676 164 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Atlantic Beach Duval $0 $0 $0 $24,890 $0 Baldwin Duval $0 $57,776 $23,400 $0 $0 Jacksonville Duval $1,203,231 $3,518,431 $3,804,729 $5,307,385 $7,108,909 Jacksonville Beach Duval $0 $0 $186,740 $200,892 $217,516 Neptune Beach Duval $0 $0 $0 $21,514 $0 Pensacola Escambia $88,639 $261,553 $304,570 $239,604 $347,334 Fla ler Beach Fla IerNolusia $1,336 $0 $0 $0 $0 Apalachicola Franklin $0 $0 $55,219 $29,472 $0 Havana Gadsden $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,812 Quincy Gadsden $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,716 Port St. Joe Gulf $0 $0 $0 $1,735 $0 White Springs Hamilton $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 Bowling Green Hardee $0 $0 $0 $2,991 $0 Wauchula Hardee $2,879 $2,762 $5,893 $6,969 $0 Zolfo Springs Hardee $0 $2,145 $0 $0 $0 Avon Park Hernando $0 $3,585 $16,357 $23,899 $14,393 Brooksville Hernando $0 $0 $0 $15,068 $49,156 Lake Placid Hernando $3,771 $0 $6,282 $5,982 $0 Sebring__ Hernando $20,882 $48,081 $32,745 $101,090 $56,603 Plant City Hillsborough $48,296 $140,476 $0 $70,590 $77,352 Tama Hillsborough $1,257,904 $2,473,684 $2,869,075 $4,221,511 $5,393,419 Temple Terrace Hillsborough $10,000 $12,116 $0 $155,107 $0 Fellsmere Indian River $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800 Indian River Shores Indian River $0 $0 $865 $0 $0 Sebastian Indian River $0 $37,220 $18,816 $54,584 $0 Vero Beach Indian River $9,258 $7,393 $15,841 $48,313 $12,977 Graceville Jackson $0 $1,000 $0 $66,546 $0 Marianna Jackson $4,969 $8,521 $6,463 $9,448 $23,100 Monticello Jefferson $0 $0 $0 $14,675 $0 Clermont Lake $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,261 Eustis Lake $0 $0 $13,143 $0 $61,252 Lad Lake Lake $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Leesbur Lake $37,455 $49,684 $60,436 $89,686 $109,532 Mascotte Lake $0 $0 $0 $32,534 $0 Mount Dora Lake $0 $0 $43,791 $55,085 $0 Tavares Lake $3,438 $2,369 $6,464 $10,145 $0 Cape Coral Lee $171,569 $315,688 $283,860 $329,689 $412,853 Fort Meyers Lee $595,721 $701,531 $783,402 $576,669 $432,103 Sanibel Lee $44,393 $0 $3,297 $4,187 $7,250 Tallahassee Leon $529,418 $440,488 $621,483 $1,491,383 $874,019 Chiefland Lev $0 $2,583 $0 $0 $18,633 Williston Lev $0 $1,850 $4,491 $9,149 $0 Bradenton Manatee $176,355 $73,351 $176,356 $312,340 $409,778 Belleview Marion $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,591 Dunnellon Marion $0 $18,511 $0 $0 $0 Ocala Marion $282,954 $264,670 $536,188 $495,648 $366,943 Jupiter Island Martin $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 165 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Stuart Martin $0 $9,663 $0 $0 $0 Aventura Miami-Dade $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bay Harbor Islands Miami-Dade $0 $0 $0 $4,606 $0 Coral Gables Miami-Dade $150,000 $18,566 $28,297 $0 $0 Florida City Miami-Dade $0 $0 $103,680 $108,869 $113,491 Hialeah Miami-Dade $97,191 $308,734 $460,253 $482,569 $522,893 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Homestead Miami-Dade $411,657 $111,186 $460,208 $507,000 $469,382 Miami Miami-Dade $2,186,793 $2,935,882 $3,679,343 $3,103,628 $9,351,421 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0 $385,705 $541,189 $547,233 $664,702 North Miami Miami-Dade $387,191 $356,671 $307,540 $220,438 $291,247 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $545,400 $652,923 $235,948 $126,339 $191,240 O a-Locka Miami-Dade $79,876 $129,332 $167,890 $220,373 $0 South Miami Miami-Dade $0 $0 $85,623 $114,043 $191,481 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $5,966 $0 $23,933 $74,486 $205,913 West Miami Miami-Dade $0 $1,868 $5,711 $6,819 $7,488 Key West Monroe $284,722 $411,943 $41,517 $55,303 $97,040 Fernandina Beach Nassau $4,677 $3,759 $14,463 $18,040 $0 Crestview Okaloosa $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,562 Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $0 $6,641 $21,071 $69,085 $23,433 Niceville Okaloosa $2,515 $0 $0 $0 $0 Okeechobee Okeechobee $0 $4,523 $10,000 $0 $0 Apopka Orange $0 $0 $62,343 $57,666 $0 Maitland Orange $0 $62,965 $20,000 $3,560 $0 Oakland Orange $0 $0 $0 $1,824 $0 Ocoee Orange $0 $0 $0 $0 $861,870 Orlando Orange $583,117 $962,442 $1,758,601 $2,397,488 $4,832,099 Winter Garden Orange $0 $7,071 $14,619 $34,308 $0 Winter Park Orange $10,000 $89,654 $0 $123,707 $0 Kissimmee Osceola $0 $102,770 $160,061 $39,106 $95,722 Saint Cloud Osceola $162,300 $0 $136,215 $25,880 $10,150 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0 $74,107 $100,795 $0 $235,768 Boca Raton Palm Beach $206,150 $246,831 $159,155 $54,533 $82,389 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $71,720 $30,557 $84,286 $244,334 $257,976 Delray Beach Palm Beach $59,351 $422,034 $430,462 $614,325 $589,728 Greenacres Palm Beach $0 $0 $32,860 $0 $0 Highland Beach Palm Beach $0 $0 $10,622 $0 $47,690 Jupiter Palm Beach $4,163 $10,334 $22,499 $45,202 $319,335 Lake Worth Palm Beach $45,543 $2,375 $67,603 $0 $0 Lantana Palm Beach $9,124 $2,860 $0 $0 $0 Manala an Palm Beach $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 North Palm Beach Palm Beach $4,993 $4,496 $0 $0 $0 Pahokee Palm Beach $0 $0 $0 $0 $69,022 Palm Beach Palm Beach 4519 0 $6,853 0 0 Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach $58,607 $167,820 $208,644 $71,480 $0 Palm Springs Palm Beach $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $0 $285,774 $1,161,559 $884,952 $696,979 166 i Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2002 -2006 Municipality Count 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Royal Palm Beach Palm Beach $31,405 $0 $11,920 $0 $0 West Palm Beach Palm Beach $470,528 $826,388 $579,534 $804,820 $1,136,750 Dade City Pasco $0 $0 $0 $17,631 $30,404 New Port Richey Pasco $51,774 $0 $0 $0 $0 Port Riche Pasco $0 $6,829 $0 $85,600 $0 Ze h rhills Pasco $9,659 $0 $0 $0 $0 Clearwater Pinellas $36,585 $338,559 $458,892 $1,171,608 $1,111,807 Dunedin Pinellas $0 $0 $0 $37,024 $0 Largo Pinellas $1,759,925 $293,738 $182,757 $43,770 $127,522 Madeira Beach Pinellas $0 $0 $0 $9,942 $9,543 Oldsmar Pinellas $0 $0 $10,000 $17,500 $0 Pinellas Park Pinellas $48,045 $16,231 $90,774 $72,353 $85,663 Saint Petersburg Pinellas $668,716 $782,383 $913,393 $1,388,347 $1,679,109 Tarpon Springs Pinellas $0 $76,889 $28,254 $73,561 $88,075 Treasure Island Pinellas $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bartow Polk $37,565 $0 $20,759 $90,780 $214,327 Eagle Lake Polk $1,962 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 Fort Meade Palk $0 $0 $5,270 $0 $0 Frostproof Polk $0 $0 $3,167 $0 $0 Haines City Polk $28,672 $32,958 $49,059 $28,419 $22,373 Lake Alfred Polk $0 $0 $0 $6,558 $0 Lakeland Polk $238,325 $144,595 $292,196 $439,541 $874,377 Winter Haven Polk $1,050 $104 $0 $70,230 $112,689 Crescent City Putnam $0 $0 $0 $7,145 $7,209 Palatka Putnam $134,360 $21,566 $38,578 $0 $70,701 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $27,663 $68,222 $176,259 $419,639 $71,490 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $209,698 $219,902 $0 $554,486 $290,675 Gulf Breeze Santa Rosa $0 $17,504 $46,987 $0 $0 Milton Santa Rosa $5,030 $3,559 $0 $0 $16,250 Sarasota Sarasota $61,570 $54,595 $128,015 $1,070,524 $167,653 Altamonte Springs Seminole $0 $12,093 $47,233 $0 $0 Casselber Seminole $0 $11,132 $26,746 $50,000 $200,503 Lake Ma Seminole $0 $0 $6,878 $0 $0 Longwood Seminole $0 $33,130 $0 $0 $0 Oviedo Seminole $0 $222,774 $43,680 $135,654 $141,522 Sanford Seminole $191,700 $131,120 $355,611 $465,103 $35,068 Winter Springs Seminole $0 $101,879 $128,031 $0 $0 Bushnell Sumter $0 $2,506 $0 $0 $0 Wildwood Sumter $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,238 Live Oak Suwanee $102,572 $26,56 $0 $0 $82,395 Per Taylor $0 $8,471 $0 $0 $0 Daytona Beach Volusia $264,971 $119,238 $124,388 $229,892 $454,925 Daytona Beach Shores Volusia $0 $0 $0 $7,618 $0 Deland Volusia $86,238 $197,976 $166,833 $158,723 $124,085 Edgewater Volusia $0 $6,847 $0 $0 $0 Holly Hill Volusia $0 $10,000 $38,402 $0 $44,963 Lake Helen Volusia $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,235 167 Appendix C Reported Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Ending Se tember 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $8,259 $8,259 $10,721 $17,496 $9,135 Orange City Volusia $0 $62,652 $49,332 $0 $0 Ormond Beach Volusia $0 $23,103 $16,684 $0 $93,148 Ponce Inlet Volusia $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Port Orange Volusia $103,349 $84,868 $70,858 $151,013 $230,213 DeFuniak Springs Walton $5,850 $4,407 $11,077 $0 $0 Chi le Washington $2,514 $1,641 $4,620 $3,858 $6,509 Statewide Total $17,522,565 $23,504,135 $29,548,915 $37,555,354 $51,118,192 Data Source: US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt ://harvester,census. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records 168 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Alachua Alachua $12.79 $0.58 $2.74 $ 0.48 $0.00 Archer Alachua $0.00 $0.29 $0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 Gainesville Alachua $8.70 $6.00 $4.39 $ 8.95 $5.39 High Springs Alachua $0.00 $0.00 $0.98 $ 0.92 $0.00 Lynn Haven Bay $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.71 $0.76 Mexico Beach Bay $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 Panama City Bay $1.41 $3.15 $2.98 $ 2.67 $5.93 Panama City Beach Bay $0.00 $0.97 $1.35 $ 1.76 $2.80 Springfield Bay $ 0.00 $0.47 $1.39 $ 1.98 $1.60 Starke Bradford $ 0.58 $0.61 $0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 Cocoa Brevard $ 5.77 $3.44 $7.79 $ 1.89 $5.41 Cocoa Beach Brevard $ 0.00 $0.72 $1 1.67 $ 0.00 $0.00 Melbourne Brevard $ 0.61 $2.79 $ 4.47 $ 2.51 $2.73 Palm Bay Brevard $ 0.34 $0.59 $ 2.45 $ 2.34 $2.14 Rockledge Brevard $ 0.00 $0.29 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $1.36 Satellite Beach Brevard $ 0.30 $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.39 $0.00 Titusville Brevard $ 1.99 $0.76 $ 1.16 $ 2.13 $2.23 Cooper City Broward $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $1.27 Coral Springs Broward $ 0.50 $0.30 $ 0.61 $ 1.62 $2.33 Dania Beach Broward $ 0.65 $1.37 $ 1.47 $ 0.00 $3.11 Davie Broward $ 0.00 $3.68 $ 2.22 $ 0.95 $5.24 Deerfield Beach Broward $ 0.37 $0.78 $ 0.37 $ 0.63 $1.13 Fort Lauderdale Broward $ 1.41 $1.11 $ 2.93 $ 6.80 $10.00 Hallandale Beach Broward $ 0.48 $1.10 $ 2.98 $ 3.60 $5.68 Holl ood Broward $ 3.44 $2.56 $ 3.59 $3.22 $6.65 Lauderdale Lakes Broward $ 0.52 $0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Lauderhill Broward $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 1.35 $0.00 $0.00 Mar ate Broward $ 0.60 $0.49 $ 0.86 $2.29 $3.36 Miramar Broward $ 0.81 $3.04 $ 4.08 $4.06 $4.60 North Lauderdale Broward $ 0.00 $1.58 $ 2.78 $3.89 $1.21 Oakland Park Broward $0.66 $1.26 $ 3.14 $0.00 $6.01 Parkland Broward $0.00 $0.00 $ 1.39 $0.00 $0.00 Pembroke Pines Broward $0.67 $0.86 $ 1.21 $1.29 $2.35 Plantation Broward $0.32 $0.00 $1.02 $1.16 $0.44 Pompano Beach Broward $1.89 $0.50 $3.02 $2.09 $5.81 Sunrise Broward $1.75 $3.27 $2.75 $3.02 $4.79 Tamarac Broward $0.19 $0.23 $0.36 $4.50 $2.53 Weston Broward $0.00 $0.00 $0.19 $0.00 $0.00 Wilton Manors Broward $0.00 $0.00 $8.48 $0.00 $0.00 Blountstown Calhoun $0.40 $16.58 $0.00 $20.00 $0.00 Crystal River Citrus $0.00 $2.23 $2.86 $0.00 $7.92 Green Cove Springs Clay $0.00 $0.00 $1.29 $1.77 $2.11 Marco Island Collier $2.08 $0.00 $9.58 $0.00 $0.00 Naples Collier $0.44 $0.00 $0.19 $4.01 $0.00 Lake City Columbia $0.00 $0.00 $4.62 $5.29 $0.00 Arcadia De Sots . $0.00 1 $0.60 $0.00 $3.18 $0.00 169 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipals County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Cross City Dixie $0.00 $0.62 $1.43 $15.06 $0.00 Atlantic Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.79 $0.00 Baldwin Duval $0.00 $35.32 $14.26 $0.00 $0.00 Jacksonville Duval $1.44 $4.31 $4.78 $6.7$ $9.28 Jacksonville Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $8.67 $9.50 $10.33 Neptune Beach Duval $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.98 $0.00 Pensacola Escambia $1.61 $4.77 $5.40 $4.26 $6.17 Fla ler Beach Fla ler/Volusia $0.24 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Apalachicola Franklin $0.00 $0.00 $22.89 $1 2.35 $0.00 Havana Gadsden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $6.88 Quincy Gadsden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $4.66 Port St. Joe Gulf $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.48 $0.00 White Springs Hamilton $0.00 $1.30 $0.00 $ 1.26 $0.00 Bowling Green Hardee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.99 $0.00 Wauchula Hardee $0.65 $0.67 $1.34 $ 1.61 $0.00 Zolfo Springs Hardee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 Avon Park Hernando $0.00 $0.41 $1.86 $ 2.78 $1.68 Brooksville Hernando $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 2.06 $6.77 Lake Placid Hernando $2.14 $0.00 $ 3.66 $ 3.55 $0.00 Sebring Hernando $2.04 $ 4.74 $ 3.26 $10.26 $ 5.78 Plant City Hillsborough $1.47 $ 4.33 $ 0.00 $2.22 $ 2.44 Tama Hillsborough $3.80 $ 7.58 $ 8.86 $13.26 $1 7.29 Temple Terrace Hillsborough $0.43 $ 0.55 $ 0.00 $7.09 $ 0.00 Fellsmere Indian River $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 0.45 Indian River Shores Indian River $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.24 $0.00 $ 0.00 Sebastian Indian River $0.00 $ 1.86 $ 0.97 $2.99 $ 0.00 Vero Beach Indian River $0.51 $ 0.41 $ 0.88 $2.69 $ 0.72 Graceville Jackson $0.00 $ 0.40 $ 0.00 $27.16 $ 0.00 Marianna Jackson $0.76 $ 1.31 $ 1.00 $1.48 $ 3.68 Monticello Jefferson $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $5.79 $ 0.00 Clermont Lake $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 0.82 Eustis Lake $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.78 $0.00 $ 3.94 Lad Lake Lake $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 Leesburg Lake $1.99 $ 2.84 $ 3.62 $5.51 $ 6.80 Mascotte Lake $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $9.38 $ 0.00 Mount Dora Lake $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 4.07 $5.20 $ 0.00 Tavares Lake $0.27 $ 0.21 $ 0.59 $0.95 $ 0.00 Cape Coral Lee $1.11 $ 2.25 $ 2.14 $2.74 $ 3.65 Fort Meyers Lee $9.06 $1 1.42 $1 3.60 $10.98 $ 8.42 Sanibel Lee $7.02 $ 0.00 $ 0.52 $0.67 $ 1.18 Tallahassee Leon $3.00 $ 2.52 $ 3.67 $9.19 $ 5.58 Chiefland Lev $0.00 $ 1.23 $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 9.26 Williston Lev $0.00 $ 0.76 $ 1.93 $3.97 $ 0.00 Bradenton Manatee $3.21 $ 1.35 $ 3.35 $5.99 $ 8.20 Belleview Marion $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 1.30 Dunnellon Marion $0.00 $ 9.401 _ $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 170 F 1 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Ocala Marion $5.46 $5.35 $11.32 $10.51 $7.90 Jupiter Island Martin $1.59 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.61 Stuart Martin $0.00 $0.59 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Aventura Miami-Dade $0.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Bay Harbor Islands Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.89 $0.00 Coral Gables Miami-Dade $3.38 $0.42 $0.64 $0.00 $0.00 Florida City Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $11.90 $12.86 $13.96 Hialeah Miami-Dade $0.43 $1.34 $1.97 $2.07 $2.26 Hialeah Gardens Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Homestead Miami-Dade $9.54 $2.90 $12.61 $14.49 $14.31 Miami Miami-Dade $5.59 $7.59 $9.69 $8.32 $25.52 Miami Beach Miami-Dade $0.00 $4.12 $5.91 $6.05 $7.47 North Miami Miami-Dade $6.48 $5.91 $5.12 $3.67 $4.85 North Miami Beach Miami-Dade $13.40 $15.87 $5.57 $3.00 $4.53 O a-Locka Miami-Dade $5.16 $8.38 $10.42 $14.13 $0.00 South Miami Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.00 $7.86 $10.59 $17.80 Sweetwater Miami-Dade $0.42 $0.00 $1.68 $5.22 $14.44 West Miami Miami-Dade $0.00 $0.32 $0.93 $1.11 $1.25 Key West Monroe $11.25 $15.53 $1.58 $2.14 $3.75 Fernandina Beach Nassau $0.40 $0.32 $1.25 $1.59 $0.00 Crestview Okaloosa $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.39 Fort Walton Beach Okaloosa $0.00 $0.32 $1.02 $3.37 $1.16 Niceville Okaloosa $0.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Okeechobee Okeechobee $0.00 $0.83 $1.83 $0.00 $0.00 Apopka Oran a $0.00 $0.00 $1.89 $1.84 $0.00 Maitland Orange $0.00 $3.97 $1.21 $0.23 $0.00 Oakland Orange $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.11 $0.00 Ocoee Orange $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $31.63 Orlando Orange $2.60 $4.42 $8.42 $11.88 $24.79 Winter Garden Orange $0.00 $0.29 $0.66 $1.68 $0.00 Winter Park Orange_ $0.35 $3.22 $0.00 $4.69 $0.00 Kissimmee Osceola $0.00 $1.77 $2.87 $0.74 $1.88 Saint Cloud Osceola $5.40 $0.00 $5.58 $1.10 $0.47 Belle Glade Palm Beach $0.00 $4.94 $6.74 $0.00 $15.86 Boca Raton Palm Beach $2.41 $2.89 $1.99 $0.72 $1.09 Boynton Beach Palm Beach $1.07 $0.47 $1.29 $3.78 $4.10 Delray Beach Palm Beach $0.93 $6.61 $6.79 $9.82 $9.58 Greenacres Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $1.08 $0.00 $0.00 Highland Beach Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $2.64 $0.00 $12.04 Jupiter Palm Beach $0.08 $0.21 $0.49 $1.03 $7.55 Lake Worth Palm Beach $1.25 $0.07 $1.90 $0.00 $0.00 Lantana Palm Beach $0.90 $0.30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Manala an Palm Beach $0.00 $2.82 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 North Palm Beach Palm Beach $0.40 $0.36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Pahokee Palm Beach $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.36 Palm Beach Palm Beach $0.47 $0.00 $0.71 $0.00 $0.00 171 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Municipality County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach $1.22 $3.68 $4.92 $0.00 $0.00 Palm Springs Palm Beach $0.69 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Riviera Beach Palm Beach $0.00 $8.59 $35.29 $28.34 $22.48 Royal Palm Beach Palm Beach $1.04 $0.00 $0.41 $0.00 $0.00 West Palm Beach Palm Beach $4.37 $8.17 $5.93 $8.87 $13.19 Dade City Pasco $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.72 $4.76 New Port Riche Pasco $3.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Port Riche Pasco $0.00 $2.14 $0.00 $27.27 $0.00 Ze h rhills Pasco $0.77 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Clearwater Pinellas $0.33 $3.05 $4.16 $10.65 $10.13 Dunedin Pinellas $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.00 $0.00 Largo Pinellas $23.20 $3.92 $ 2.51 $0.61 $1.82 Madeira Beach Pinellas $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $2.20 $2.11 Oldsmar Pinellas $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 0.73 $1.29 $0.00 Pinellas Park Pinellas $ 0.98 $0.34 $ 1.91 $1.55 $1.84 Saint Petersburg Pinellas $ 2.63 $ 3.08 $ 3.61 $5.50 $6.71 Tarpon Springs Pinellas $ 0.00 $ 3.25 $ 1.22 $3.22 $3.94 Treasure Island Pinellas $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Bartow Polk $ 2.32 $ 0.00 $ 1.32 $5.86 $13.93 Eagle Lake Polk $ 0.74 $ 0.40 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fort Meade Polk $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.90 $0.00 $0.00 Frostproof Polk $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 1.06 $0.00 $0.00 Haines City Polk $ 1.60 $ 2.07 $ 3.32 $2.01 $1.62 Lake Alfred Polk $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $1.65 $0.00 Lakeland Polk $ 2.60 $ 1.59 $ 3.26 $4.95 $10.22 Winter Haven Polk $ 0.03 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $2.61 $4.24 Crescent City Putnam $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $3.94 $4.04 Palatka Putnam $1 1.77 $ 1.93 $ 3.57 $0.00 $6.90 Fort Pierce Saint Lucie $ 0.67 $ 1.77 $ 4.51 $10.83 $1.85 Port Saint Lucie Saint Lucie $ 1.45 $ 1.70 $ 0.00 $5.38 $3.01 Gulf Breeze Santa Rosa $ 0.00 $ 3.04 $ 8.12 $0.00 $0.00 Milton Santa Rosa $ 0.65 $ 0.47 $ 0.00 $0.00 $2.25 Sarasota Sarasota $ 1.11 $ 1.00 $ 2.34 $19.67 $3.11 Altamonte Springs___ Seminole $ 0.00 $ 0.28 $ 1.11 $0.00 $0.00 Casselber Seminole $ 0.00 $ 0.45 $ 1.08 $2.05 $8.32 Lake Mary Seminole $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.50 $0.00 $0.00 Longwood Seminole $ 0.00 $ 2.38 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Oviedo Seminole $ 0.00 $ 7.23 $ 1.46 $4.67 $5.05 Sanford Seminole $ 3.74 $ 2.66 $ 7.72 $10.44 $0.81 Winter Springs Seminole $ 0.00 $ 3.06 $ 3.89 $0.00 $0.00 Bushnell Sumter $ 0.00 $ 1.09 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Wildwood Sumter $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $19.03 Live Oak Suwanee $1 5.46 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $20.84 Per Taylor $ 0.00 $ 1.29 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Da ona Beach Volusia $ 4.08 $ 1.83 $ 1.91 $3.54 $7.00 Daytona Beach Shores Volusia $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $1.69 $0.00 172 Appendix C Per Capita Expenditures of Department of Justice Grant Awards by Municipality Fiscal Years Endin September 30, 2002 - 2006 Munici ali County 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Deland Volusia $3.25 $7.90 $7.00 $6.93 $5.56 Edgewater Volusia $0.00 $0.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Holly Hill Volusia $0.00 $0.79 $3.04 $0.00 $3.60 Lake Helen Volusia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6.55 New Smyrna Beach Volusia $0.36 $0.37 $0.50 $0.85 $0.45 Orange City Volusia $0.00 $7.08 $6.24 $0.00 $0.00 Ormond Beach Volusia $0.00 $0.58 $0.43 $0.00 $2.48 Ponce Inlet Volusia $0.31 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Port Orange Volusia $1.84 $1.55 $1.33 $2.96 $4.71 DeFuniak Springs Walton $1.09 $0.82 $2.13 $0.00 $0.00 Chi le Washington $0.69 $0.46 $1.30 $1.10 $1.84 Statewide Average $1.35 $2.82 $3.70 $5.00 $6.16 Data Sources: Expenditure Data, US Census Bureau, Federal Audit Clearinghouse, "Single Audit Database" htt://harvester.censu§. ov/sac/dissem/accesso tions.htmPsubmit=Retrieve+Records Population Data, "Florida Estimates of Population" Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. 173 This page was intentionally left blank. 174 Appendix D: Lexington, South Carolina Success Story i 1 175 CHALLENGE Mai Louise ;Resch, Lexington, SC Grants Administrator spent 1 to 1-1/2 hours each day searching '''fear grant opportunities in the same old places. She needed to find and apply for new grant opportunities in a more timely fashion in ardor to meet the needs of herEgrowing community, SOLUTION Grants.gov helped Mary Louise Resch reduce her time searching for grant' opportunities by 90% and has identified grant opportunities in areas she never knew''"e'xisted. WHY GRANTS.GOV? Grante,gev is a single website where users can find and apply for more than $360 billion on competitive Federal grants. Users can register In one place and search and apply for opportunities across aft 26,F ederal grantirnaking agencies, u "In an era of economic downturns, deficits, and reductions in funding available through State budget dollars, resources such as Grants.gov become even more critical in helping our community to maintain our quality of life without having to raise taxes," said Daniel P. Breazeale, Sr., Mayor, Lexington, SC. "Local governments... can suc- cessfully leverage current budget levels without having to increase the tax burdens on our citizens ...The resources provided through Grants.gov makes it easier to identify potential funding sources, apply using an online application process, and complete the reporting process in a more timely and efficient manner." A Welcome Introduction to Grants.gov Lexington is the fastest growing municipality in South Carolina with a grants office consisting of one full-time employee, Mary Louise Resch. Resch's job functions include administering applications, award notifications, post-award performance, and reporting, with additional duties including Media Relations Coordinator and Chamber of Commerce Ambassador in the Town of Lexington. "For a small municipality like ours with limited grants staffing, Grants.gov has been a wonderful time-saving tool," said Resch. "The ability to quickly review, on a daily basis, postings from a variety of Federal agencies is efficient and effective. With Grants.gov, my research time is less than 30 minutes each day, I can review the grant opportunities, for- ward them to the right parties, and move on to other things." Prior to learning about Grants.gov by way of a state fund- ing source, Resch estimates that she spent 1-1/2 hours each day researching grant opportunities through individual web- sites, searching the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, reading newsletters, etc. Grants.gov has saved Resch and Lexington, SC the bulk of their research time and has freed Resch to focus on other daily duties and priorities. Grants.gov is easy to use and effective The whole grants process, according to Resch, flows better with Grants.gov. Instead of signing up at individual websites and scouring newsletters, users can log in, find grant oppor- tunities, and electronically apply. Users can manually search for grant opportunities, or, like Resch, can sign up to receive email notifications of new grant opportunities that are tailored to their specifications and community needs - alerting them when new grant opportunities come on-line giving users enough time to pre- pare a thoughtful and complete application without rushing. "Within one to two weeks we got our first hit after regis- tering online to receive email notifications of opportunity postings," Resch exclaimed, Many Grants.gov uscrs find this feature helpful, with more than 550,000 grant opportunity email notices sent weekly to the grant community. Help when and how you need it Resch noted the combination of information, clear instruc- tions and tools available on the website and the personalized communication with Grants.gov Customer Support facilitat- ed much of the process leading to their successes. "The Customer Service Team was extremely helpful in answering questions with a great desk-side manner and a lot of patience," said Resch. And like with any system, she had some challenges getting started, but felt that there was no problem that the live customer service representative couldn't solve. The Grants.gov Help Desk is ready and able to walk users through any issues they might have from finding grant opportunities to the submission of their application and any- thing in-between. As an end user, Resch continued, having an option to communicate beyond an impersonal email I FIND. APPLY. SUCCEED. I 1 176 II?..? GRANTS.GOVS"" STORY 0# t¦?'"r GRANTS.GOV` support function, to speak to someone directly and receive timely responses to questions made a big difference. Opportunities in new places "Thanks to Grants.gov, we've become aware of funding opportunities that might have been missed or we didn't know to think of, helping us to expand rapidly to meet the growing need for services. The Town of Lexington, SC can- not thank Grants.gov enough and emphasize how valuable it's been to us as end users!" said Resch. Sometimes, Resch continued to explain, the grant oppor- tunities are in places she would never have thought to look. "I would just focus on the Department of Justice for law enforcement grants but we've become aware of opportuni- ties outside of the box," Resch said. A formula that works Finding and applying for new grant opportunities has gone from tedious searches to new successes in a fraction of the time for the Town of Lexington South Carolina. Now Resch enjoys spending more time on other duties for the town while still securing the grant monies it needs. Using Grants.gov, Resch has access to over 1400 grant opportuni- ties, most she was never aware of, at her fingertips. And with features like e-mail notifications and downloadable attach- ments and applications Resch does not want to go back to manual searches and the copy machine. With Grants.gov, Resch admits, the formula works for Lexington, South Carolina. One Town + One Website s Grants Success. Grants.gov really works The Town of Lexington has had several successes. They have been able to leverage local resources to expand a rap- idly growing need for services. With the influx of grant awards, the need for tax increases for new services has diminished, and new and innovative programs have been ramped up between budget cycles. The town council has also been proactive in making grant matches. Lexington is benefiting from Grants.gov in many ways: a Research is now more targeted to Lexington's com- munity needs n The time spent researching Federal grant funding is significantly reduced a No more missed funding opportunities due to pro- gram awareness or last minute notices • Faster communication and information sharing of potential grant sources among local end users a Costs saved on reproduction and postage Just a few of the recent successful grants awarded to the Town of Lexington making an impact their commu- nity include: a National Park Service Technical Assistance Grant for the development of parks and trails. The grant will provide a design for new walking and biking trails. a U.S. Department of Justice COPS Universal Hiring Program has enabled the Town of Lexington to imme- diately hire 2 more police officers while integrating the cost for these officers into the town's budget over three years. a U.S. Army has funded a pilot project for electronic equipment used in law enforcement activities. The town received a piece of electronic monitoring equip- ment and the training (including the training travel expenses) for an officer to use it. The monitoring equipment is now being using on the multi-jurisdic- -tional narcotics task force. Gratt?«genr [?Imres? Advanced Search ftptiens- Search a wider selection of grants, from a broad searchto searches for more specific subject areas t Downloadable Applications-,Applications can be completed offline when and where convenient for useI'rs. Applications ate easily distrib- uted via email as on attachment arp submitted electronically at 'I Grants.gov upon aomplation Content-SensiM Help- Custonfized help and solutions based on the page Wing viewed so users do *.have to hunt and peck for the right help or lose their place on the site Onkne Taols, - Enhanced pAds, quirk reference guides and online dernonstt n$ guide users through the applicatioji'I'processi along with lots of resources to loam more about Grants.gw Applicant Support Center vft helpful links end grant-writing resources to ptew pare planned and concisely package applications Personalized Support- Complimor? ng the online help and support features, Grants.gov also provides fusers vvfth a dedicated Customer Support Center providing accessible via email or phone About Gronts.gov Granits.gov is the single website unifying Federal grants. Through Grants.gov, state, local, and tribal governments, colleges and univer- sities, non-profits, research institutions, and other organizations can access, find, and apply for grants from more than 900 grant programs representing over $360 billion in annual grant funds offered by the 26 Federal grant-making agencies. Grants.gov, one of 24 E-government initiatives, is a collaborative effort led by Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Collaborative partners include the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development Justice, Labor and Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency, National Endowment for the Humanities, and the National Science Foundation. FIND. APPLY. SUCCEED. 2 177 This page was intentionally left blank. 178 Appendix E: Survey Instrument 1 179 Ken Pruitt President CHAIR Rep. Faye Culp Tampa VICE CHAIR Sen. Anthony C. Frill, Sr. Jacksonville LEGISLATIVE MEMBERS Sen. Alex Diaz de la Portilla Miami Rep. Ed Hooper Clearwater Sen. Steve Oelrich Gainesville Rep. Juan-Carlos Planas Miami Sen. Gary Siplin Orlando Rep. James Waldman Coconut Creek GUBERNATORIAL APPOINTMENTS Joanna L. Cunningham Wellington Board Member Sue Hershey Martin County Kelly A. Layman Tallahassee Councilman Herbert Polson St. Petersburg T.isa Saliba Tallahassee Comm. Cyndi Stevenson St. Augustine Comm. Robert Stewart Pinellas County Executive Director Alton L. "Rip" Colvin, Jr. Tallahassee The Florida Legislature LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS `/u Legislative Mail Services, Tallahassee, FL 32399-1300 Ph. (850) 488-9627 Suncom 278-9627 Fax 487-6587 www.floridalcingov October 31, 2007 To Whom It May Concern: Marco Rubio Speaker 0 Staff of the Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (LCIR) is conducting an interim project on local governments' receipt of federal grant funds. The purpose of the survey is to solicit information regarding the historic and current status of local governments' efforts to secure federal funding through the formula and project grants process. It is anticipated that findings from this project will assist local governments in increasing the amount of federal funds they receive. The LCIR understands that depending on the structure of your local government, more than one person may have information relevant to this survey. If that is the case in your jurisdiction, please direct this survey to the person(s) best qualified to answer the questions. However, please submit only one survey response from your jurisdiction with all requested information included. In preparing responses to this survey, if you find any question unclear, please contact Thomas Zuehlke, Staff Analyst, by telephone at (850) 488- 9627 or by e-mail at zuehike.thomas.Ofloridalcir.gov. If you determine that a question is inapplicable to your unit of government or it cannot be answered, please state the reason why (i.e., data not collected). You can access and download the questionnaire from the LCIR website at http://www.floridalcir.gov/surveys.cfm, Your response to this survey may be delivered by e-mail to Thomas Zuehlke, LCIR Legislative Analyst, at zuehlke.thomas floridalcir. ov, by facsimile at 850-487-6587, or via regular mail to Thomas Zuehlke, Florida LCIR, 600 S. Calhoun Street, Suite 4, c/o Legislative Mail Services, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-1300. In order to provide the committee with a final report well in advance of the 2008 Regular Legislative Session, please submit your responses no later than November 30, 2007. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this endeavor. 180 Survey of Local Government Officials Regarding Federal Formula 1 and Project Grants Prepared by Staff of the Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations ' Staff of the Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (LCIR) is conducting an interim project on local governments' receipt of federal formula and project grant funds. The purpose of the survey is to solicit information regarding the historic and current status of local governments' efforts to secure federal ' funding through the formula and project grants process. It is anticipated that findings from this project will assist local governments in increasing the amount of federal funds they receive. 1 The LCIR understands that depending on the structure of your local government, more than one person may have information relevant to this survey. If that is the case in your jurisdiction, please direct this survey to the person(s) best qualified to answer the questions. However, please submit only one survey ' response from your jurisdiction with all requested information included. In preparing responses to this survey, if you find any question unclear, please contact Thomas Zuehlke, Staff Analyst, by telephone at (850) 488-9627 or by e-mail at ' zuehlke.thomas(&,floridalcir.aov. If you determine that a question is inapplicable to your unit of government or it cannot be answered, please state the reason why (i.e., data not collected). ' You can access and download the questionnaire . from the LCIR website at http://www.floridalcir.gov/surveys.cfm. Your response to this survey may be delivered by e-mail to Thomas Zuehlke, LCIR Legislative Analyst, at zuehlke.thomas floridalcir. ov, by facsimile at 850- 487-6587, or via regular mail to Thomas Zuehlke, Florida LCIR, 600 S. Calhoun Street, Suite 4, c/o Legislative Mail Services, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-1300. ' In order to provide the committee with a final report well in advance of the 2008 Regular Legislative Session, please submit your responses no later than November 30, 2007. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this endeavor. 1 2 181 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Name of unit of government: Name of person preparing response: Title of person preparing response: Mailing address of perspri preparing response: Office telephone and fax numbers: E-Mail address of person preparing response: Human Resources 1) Please state your official job description. a) If this survey is being answered by more than one person, please provide the number of persons participating and their respective job titles. b) Please state whether a private consultant is assisting your local government in responding to this survey. 2) Do you work on matters other than grants? 3) If you are a designated grant writer, how long has the local government had this position? 4) Do you cover grants for all departments in your local government? 5) Has anyone on staff attended federal grant workshops in the last three years? If so, which . ones? Would you recommend them to others? Resources 6) How do you find federal grant opportunities? 7) Have you found search engines to be successful in searching for federal grant opportunities? If not, why not? 8) Which search engines do you currently use to find federal grant opportunities? 9) Are there other sources you use to find federal grant opportunities? 10) To which federal agencies do you typically apply to receive grant funding? 3 182 Grant Process 11) How do you decide which grants to pursue? 12) Do you pursue any grants in partnership with other governmental entities, such as a grant collaborative or consortium? If so, please provide details. 13) Do you pursue any grants in partnership with non-governmental or quasi-governmental entities? If so, please provide details. 14) Who in your local government has the ultimate sign-off authority to pursue the grant (i.e., the Board of County Commissioners, City Manager, etc.)? 15) Do you identify which CFDA grant(s) you want to pursue and then confirm there is funding for that grant or do you wait until you receive a grant alert? Process Improvement 16) Under s. 403.061(40), F. S., the Florida Department of Environmental Protection is ' considered the state's "Single Point of Contact" or the "Florida State Clearinghouse" for administering intergovernmental coordination and review of certain state and federal grant activities. Where you aware of this? 17) What barriers exist that inhibit you from pursuing more grants? 18) Do have any suggestions on how to streamline the grant award and management process? 19) Are you aware of any studies performed by your local government (or any other) analyzing its success in securing federal grants? If so, please provide a copy. Fiscal Data 20) For each of the fiscal years 2000 through 2007, please provide the dollar amount AND percentage of the local government's revenues that are from federal project or formula grants. 21) Please provide the same information for state and local grant funds received. 4 183 This page was intentionally left blank. 184 Appendix F: Resource List 185 Appendix F Resource List Florida Association of Counties http://www.fl-countles.com/ Florida City and County Management Association http://www.fccma.org// International City/County Management Association http://www.icma.org/ Florida League of Cities http://www.flcities.com/ National Association of Counties http://www_naco.orgJ National League of Cities hLp://www.nlc.org/ United States Conference of Mayors http://usmUors.oirg/ 186