Loading...
FLD2009-12043; 387 MANDALAY AVE; ART & WINE GALLERY OF CLEARWATER BEACHFLD2009-12043 387 MANDALAY AVE AR & WINE GALLERY OF CLW BOAC PLANNER OF RECORD : MJJ ATLAS # 267A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 12/01/2009 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet CDB Meeting Date: March 16, 2010 Case Number: FLD2009-12043 Agenda Item: D. 1. Owner: Richard C. Homer Applicant: Andrea Bruenik Address: 387 %2 Mandalay Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a nightclub (wine sales) in conjunction with existing retail sales and services within the Tourist (T) District within an existing 1,512 square feet shopping center tenant space with no changes to the building or structure setbacks, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.C. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT LAND USE Resort Facilities High (RFH) PLAN CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Retail Sales and Services Proposed Use: Retail Sales and Services /Nightclub EXISTING North: Tourist (T) District Retail Sales and Services SURROUNDING South: Tourist (T) District Retail Sales and Services ZONING AND USES: East: Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations West: Tourist (T) District Attached Dwellings ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.18-acre subject property is located on the west side of Mandalay Avenue approximately 150 feet north of Causeway Boulevard, which is within the "Retail/ Restaurant" District of Beach by Design. The site is currently developed with an 8,115 square foot shopping center that is divided into four tenant spaces with no off-street parking spaces. It is noted that the building is nonconforming with regard to the minimum required setbacks and there is no off-street parking available; however the site does currently meet all other development standards. Development Proposal: On December 1, 2009, a Comprehensive hlfill Redevelopment Project application was submitted for the subject property. The application proposes to establish a nightclub use within an existing 1,512 square foot tenant space where there is presently a retail sales and services use. It should be noted that while the proposed use is technically described as a nightclub, the actual function of Community Development Board -March 16, 2010 FLD2009-12043 -Page 1 of 6 the proposed use would be more consistent with that of an art gallery that offers wine tastings and purchase of wine by the glass. The existing shopping center building will remain unchanged. Therefore, as there will be no building additions or modifications to these existing site improvements, there will be no impact upon the F.A.R., I.S.R., minimum lot area/size, maximum building height, and minimum setback development standards. The development proposal's compliance with those remaining applicable development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below. Minimum Off-Street Parkin: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the CDC, the minimum required parking for nightclubs is 10 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet, or 15 required parking spaces. The existing building and site has no on-site parking with no ability to provide any such parking. The proposal provides zero on-site parking spaces similar to many properties along Mandalay Avenue that do not have any on-site parking of their own. The proposed nightclub is located within walking distance of numerous motels, hotels and businesses within this area that rely on the existing metered on-street parking and metered parking lots. Most people park and then walk to businesses, usually visiting more than one business. The Beach Trolley also presently provides bus service from downtown to properties along Mandalay Avenue. The proposed parking reduction is another reason this application is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. As such, it is requested that the additional off-street parking requirements for the proposed nightclub be waived. It should be noted that the proposed nightclub is not intended to be a nightclub in the traditional sense, but instead more of an art gallery with wine tastings and purchase of wine by the glass. As such, the demand for off-street parking should not be as intense as it would be for a traditional nightclub and will not likely result in intensification from the existing retail sales and services use. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect Criteria: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-803, the uses allowed within the Tourist (T) District are subject to the standards and criteria set forth. in this Section. Among those criteria established for the review of Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects is the following: 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; Community Development Board -March 16, 2010 FLD2009-12043 -Page 2 of 6 d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. As previously noted, the proposal does not contain any changes to the existing shopping center building, and while the proposal will meet some of the above criteria, it cannot meet others without being required to modify the existing architectural elevations of the shopping center. However, to require such changes simply to accommodate a proposed change of use for an existing tenant space would be impractical and inappropriate. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per CDC Sections 2- 801.1 and 2-803: Standard Existing /Proposed Consistent Inconsistent F.A.R. 1.0 0.83 X' LS.R. 0.95 0.94 X' Minimum Lot Area 5,000 - 10,000 square feet 8,115 square feet X' Minimum Lot Width 50 - 100 feet Mandalay Avenue: 75 feet X' Maximum Building Height 25 - 50 feet 20 feet X' Minimum Setbacks Front: 15 feet West: Four feet (to building) X' Zero feet (to pavement) Side: 10 feet North Zero feet (to building) X' South: Zero feet (to building) X' Rear: 20 feet East: 4.5 feet (to building) X' Zero feet (to pavement) Minimum 15 parking spaces Zero parking spaces }{z Off-Street Parkin Figures reflect existing conditions on site that are not tieing altered or approved Gy the proposed application. See above discussion with regard to Minimum Off-Street Parking. Community Development Board -March 16, 2010 FLD2009-12043 -Page 3 of 6 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.C (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street Xt parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape desi n and a ro riate distances between buildin s. ~ See nbove discussion with regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criterin. Community Development Board -March 16, 2010 FLD2009-12043 -Page 4 of 6 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of January 7, 2019, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 0.18-acre subject property is located on the west side of Mandalay Avenue approximately 150 feet north of the Causeway Boulevard; 2. That the subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Retail/ Restaurant" district; 4. That the subject property is presently nonconforming with respect to the provision of an adequate number ofoff-street parking spaces; 5. That the subject property is presently nonconforming with respect to the existing shopping center building not meeting the minimum required setbacks; 6. That the proposal consists only of a change of use from retail sales and services to nightclub within an existing shopping center building; 7. That the proposal has no impact upon the following development standards: F.A.R., I.S.R., minimum lot area/size and maximum building height, as they presently exist; 8. That the proposed will not exacerbate the existing nonconforming setbacks for the shopping center building; and 9. That the subject property is developed with a total of zero off-street parking spaces, which does not meet the minimum off-street parking requirement for the property as currently occupied, and with the proposed change of use this nonconformity would be increased. Community Development Board -March 16, 2010 FLD2009-12043 -Page 5 of 6 Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per CDC Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803; 2. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Flexibility criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per CDC Section 2-803.C; and 3. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913.A. Based upon the above and subject to the attached conditions, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit a nightclub (wine sales) in conjunction with existing retail sales and services within the Tourist (T) District within an existing 1,512 square feet shopping center tenant space with no changes to the building or structure setbacks, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.C, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That this use (art gallery and wine bar) be limited to this tenant space only, and that any desired relocation within this shopping center or enlargement of floor area shall require a new application for re-review by the CDB; 2. That on-premise consumption of alcoholic beverages be limited to beer and wine (2-COP); . 3. That there shall be no enticing alcoholic drink specials, such as, but not. limited to, ladies night, sink or swim, or quarter beer night; 4. That there be no music played loud enough to impede low decibel conversation; and 5. That there shall be no amplified music or microphone usage. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Matthew kson, Planner II ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs of Site and Vicinity S.•IPlnnning DepnrtmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cnsesl Up for the next CDBIMnndnlny 0387 Art and Wine Bnr (T) 2010.03 - MJIStnff Report 03.16.2010.doc Community Development Board -March 16, 2010 FLD2009-12043 -Page 6 of 6 Matthew Jackson 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727)562-4836 matthew.jackson(amvcleanvater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ^ Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 2008 to Present Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. ^ Planner I Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007 Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances. In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead project kick-off meetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, .produce supporting documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development.. costs. Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities. ^ Manager Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004 Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub .entertainment complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing and special events. ^ Linguist US Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995 Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training. EDUCATION ^ Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007 ^ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004 KENDALL ~^ z a BAY ESPLANADE ;, ~ vy 0 t y z Rocwa~vav Ambler BAYMONT ST Sl~F w Q ¢ 4 $4N MARG ~ J ~ ~~" '" Prn PROJECT ~ SITE PAPAYA ST r< ~ b \ f'rer $p zg .~ o F(RSr ~'' sr a 4 SECOND oE~O" S7 ~ y DR 11- _ N17p 3 ~ ur tt o ~ o a ~n gar~,r waTER DR j~ F(FT}( ST LOCATION Owner: Homer Properties, Inc Case: FLD2009-12043 Site: 387 Mandalay Avenue Property Size: 0.18 acres PIN: 08-29-15-02592-001-0230 Atlas Page: 267A 431 432 436 425 430 429 4 7Meter 439 423 b ~ z y 425 428 423 ~ ° 2 ~ 421 429 419 426 419 Q 417 ~ Q 415 , 413 Q 422 Z 411 Q T ~ ~ 409 ~ 4238 O 407 423A D l ~ 405 406 ~ y 411 403 2 408 h 401 4 y 409 400 399 406 405 393 391387 403 400 385 400 401 /R201 390 CA EWAY B / 61 0 0 Q 61 G p N P ZONING Owner: Homer Properties, Inc Case: FLD2009-12043 Site: 387 Mandalay Avenue Property Size: 0.18 acres PIN: 08-29-15-02592-001-0230 Atlas Page: 267A 7s 4 ~ 951 - _ ~ 10 e 1s 454 4 9 1345 - - A ~ ~ ~ , 11 - 8~ 45 `a Z PHASE 2 ~ ~ 14 14 - - - 44 18 83 443 _ _ _ o ~n' d ~ oa4 e~ 4¢1 17 ~ 15 15 12 16 es ~ A S saz.ss _ _ ~ a '$`{~ ~ 441 42 c~ 1 1 2 3- 432 2 436 425 2 431 4 41 430 ~ ~9 5 -I 40 439 - - - - - 3 ~ 423 3 Q 7 _ 4428 425. 4 J 42J 8 I 39 41 - - - Q 421 9 1 429 ~.. ; 5428 ~ 41~ 2 ~. .. W (~ ------ ~~~~~~..~a~~s ~~ Q Overnight ~ uJ s 1~ _ _ _ _ Accommodations ~~=~-~~.~cesf ,422 Q 7 ~::, ~..~., W ----- Q 409 5 423 16 I !7 423 6 C~8 ~, 407 = - - - - ~1~ Z 0517 Q 9 8 N -1 408 J 40318 34 0 _ h X08 2 ~OZ9 - 33 Q ~ ~ 10 409 10 20 400 Q - - - - - - - - - - - ~ Re~~~ -~~17'~S ~ - - 12 - - - - - ~9~ - - 3 24 ~ 1 3~8 - - ~ ar~d ~erv~ices~~ - - - - - - - " ` 3 40 0 13 30 26 _ _ _ _ s ~ 'c2;~ ;- 1 * - - - -14400 401 14 - - - - - R~ttail S~1es,,~;~~erv~ces = = F so w~ ..... '° (1 s~ 60 390 1 1 WATER 1 I ~ T2 O1 5 ", 1 8 1 g 81 - - 201 1 1 (16) I Ih so so en ,~ ~ z8 ' 1 I 1 1 ~ , ss ('~{ 1 I r- ~ 11 10 ~ ~ `'! 12 ~ L 15606 ~ 1 13 ~ L EXISTING Owner: Homer Properties, Inc Case: FLD2009-12043 Site: 387 Mandalay Avenue Property Size: 0.18 acres PIN: 08-29-15-02592-001-0230 Atlas Page: 267A 0 c 1 \ ~ I' I z ~ ' ~ ' ~= ~ ~ .,. ~ a ~ 4' i~-=- ° ` ~ ~ ~ r• ~ : ( r ( _ INS; ~, - .~ i~• ~, ~ +,J 1 ^ ~a 1 17 ~ ~ ,n 7 '~A1 ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ (1 i ~ ' ( ~ ~ i. 0 .. ~ b "° ~q"!" 1 ~ • e Y ~ ~ ~~ a ~ ~ . ~p wV ~ , R ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ '~~" ~a oF~e~r2~ R ~ R 1 ~ ~, a , ~ • '~ a ~q ~~ .,~;.A~lAP' i ~ • s ~ `"~ ~~ ~~~ ' ~ ~ lwa,eR..~.G Q. ~~~8,. E~ E F ~, E~'IA4 , AERIAL Owner: Homer Properties, Inc Case: FLD2009-12043 Site: 387 Mandalay Avenue Property Size: 0.18 acres PIN: 08-29-15-02592-001-0230 Atlas Page: 267A •r:~ '~": I ~/ 1 387 %Z Mandalay Ave FLD2009-12043 View of store interior. View from southwest corner of property east. View of store interior. View from southeast corner of properly looking north. View from west of property looking east. View of store interior. ~- ClearNarer Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax:727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 387 MANDALAY AVM ~LD20o9-12043 ART & WINE GALLERY OF CLW BEAC Zoning: T atlas# 267A `°~` * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/'L008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A~ APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INF/O_RMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: ~,Z~r~ct ~ ~ Lr' ~~~` _ _ -- -- -- - ~ S' ----- - - - MAILINGADDRESS: -~?~'~ ~It~„~~~,~,Z ~y~;~~~, C/~krw7 ~ ~_ cL ~ ~j ~~ __ PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: __ ___ _ _. _- --__ _ CELL NUMBER ~ ~/ - _ EMAIL ~f.Yen~Y C(W- ~©/~ ___ - - --- - __ PROPERTY OWNERS : Q ( ) 1~+~~"i'Li, vi ~ _~'7~+,t.'T~I~A 5~o-~ ~} -ft'v.a.g~ ~r~i/>~7i-; ~~i~tf List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: /°`~~~rt z_ -~" __~/c~~-r~~ -- _ ___ _ --- -- --- -- /- -~_,- r ,~ M,4ILINGADDRESS: -~~ fU~~;L~~-_ fi~a.r.-77 t 1~ ~.•~•-' /~~ t ~d l~l --~~-`~~'~'---L- -- PHONE NUMBER: ~~(j-~~ j- ~g_ C~ ~* / ~ - FAX hIUMBER: CELL NUMBER: ~~~-' yj ~ - _ _ - EMAIL: r ~ ~ I " - ~ ~ ,; .~ B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: ~f ~ ~ f~/~Ja~ ~-.-r;,~jer PROJECT VALUATION: $ - - - - STREETADDRESS ,3 ~~ l ~L 4~~(v_zr~r~~4 ~70~ } C~P~r it,. fir/ ~}~er~ /~ G~~ S .3 ~G 2 PARCEL NUMBER(S): ~ r1,_ ^ _` . f/`r ~..L ~- t.~~~ y ( -, ~ ~ _ ~ c~ ._ ~ ~ ~;? _ - C.~.L G -_ _ PARCEL SIZE (acres): ~ j'- ~~ ~ PARCEL SIZE (square feet) _ ~ 11~C~ ~ ~ ! t3-- - _ _ _. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1s,1'?t%. ~1L'! ~ ~'4r>/io~ Lv_' ~_ V~ ~ _._~~% ~ ~,- _ ~ /l l~s ~ ~._ .'~- t! ~}',1/~ ..i-5~. __ / / _ _ - _ _ __- _. .- _-- -- PROPOSED USE(S): ,-~ ~ ~t;^~ C~--c~lc ~ {-( ,,,.. ~~ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: G ~ k n e ~ 4C S e ~ ~ ~ d 0 __ ___ P_-kL -_sOV!_ _ _ v ; S ecificall identi the re uest ~> }'~ /t p g v ~ q ~ 5c f ~ac~/~ ~ ~r~~ ~ 3 !~ 7 ~ _t-~` ~ ~~~~1~ . 1~~z, _ i.2~5 ~ ~~ ~=~- (include number of units or square C foota e of non-residential use and all ~= r~ i ; ...;} J ~-- ~~_; ht, .~ ~ p ~ ~ ~~-; r? ~ ;,,,~,,, r ~ ~„ ;~ ~£ requested code deviations; e.g. /. ~ ~ ~ I J jj reduction in required number of + t - ~'~~ = *' '~' ' ~ `' "~ ` i = fit? ~ ~L'1 ~'S ~ ~•, •" .` t +~ - _ parking spaces, specifc use, etc.) S \Planning Department\Application Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infll Project (FLD) 2008 07-1 tdoc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO `~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ,:. ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN PCFFIDA IT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. _ _ - _ _ _ _ --- s-- -- ~ _ - - - --- - --- - 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair t6`he value thereof. j / jj / - f__ ___ ---- ~~ l~+d ~ irrr! '~l.'_S~rt mss d ~ ~'20~~~ ~~ ~ ~ v t it/z ~ _-- - - 3. The p,,ro/posed defvelopment will not adversely affect the health or/safety of pers/on/s residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. III N~o U 2JZ~a yn PH ~ ~1 ~z ' ~'r!$~Lh ~e ~ (~d h,- - -3 -~ ___ _ __ _ ___ -- _ __ 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. CtiK~r-~~ - - -- s- - - _ _ -- _._ 5. The proposed development is consisten with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. , r I h 1 _ vJ U3 r ~ ~~ i.v(/ ! .~ <'v / 2 1 4.° S iT*"~a_F' ! ! sh qc, ., f%_ ~~ ~? r ~,ry~ / y~, aJ '1 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties .~(~~ I_ I~-C '/(l3«1 eSs ;,.-~ C ''Is't~ C ~SC"r~{-~ ~j~~:lt2c55 `'1cTv~z~ 4+tr(/ ,~ . Cif ~t~~c _.. J _ ~ ___ ~j ~Y 2r,~~s ~.- TTi r ~, S:1Planning Department\P,pplication FormslDevelopment Review12008 Forms\Comprehensive Infll Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) O Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. F ~~P T M1-+ i r: r ~ ~%~ l% t ~' I I - ~---- ~_'-'~.'•- r' .::.~/ _". ~ ~~ ! ~'3 *-^': S s~'c,~ _ : ~. r-iif ~_. ~r1~f ~t y.. ,. ..mac ~,_rn~~' _ _ -- f( / .. _. ~~ ~'1C_ CGS ;TS '~ C C f (~_ C ~ c7 5 r-_------- ---- __ . __ _ _ _ ~l 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district .~ , ^ / - , ILt ~~~ ~~j~rrt ~-4{rf'. ~~-., c-,~~~ ~~ic---`~':r 'z Gib'/~~/c_~fwi ~`r n_~~( 21~`_ '2"~„~ _._ __-_ - - f J - _- j Y j/ (,%~1 ~~i~.~ ~ ~•:. ~~'s~-~;i r' t, ' l ~l ice.; i rt--'v LJ + `+~` y~ i ~1 ~'- -~ s~--~G - %/n J,' 1.~J ~ 7.'~ ~_ _ _ _ - ~-- ~ _a ~~, u,~-~ : _ 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede th ~ormal and orderly develgpment and improvement of surrounding properties. r / _ _ 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of th~ proposed development / _ -- ~~.~_ ~vt_~tr~~~~ __. ~l'.~'hG:~--- ~1~'LS~_ ~~J~-`` ~5~--~ f-.> ~~G, ~~d,~~r3~S~ -'~_I ~ tf~ ~zlr 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following o~ectives: ~a1 The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or Flexible development use; (~ The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The deveiopme~rii proposal accommodates ripe expansion or redevelopment of an existing 2ccnomic ccntributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and Q~,y ~*e ^ Distinctive roofs forms. { ~- F.p2~j~ t~'a~~ ~~ e. The proposed development provides for apprppriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropri~e distances between buildings ~„ Y ~ ! I .. t ~a Cr i-~1,~ S: ~1f~ f ~% 1 - r `~ 1 - - ----- _- -- - - -- - __ .w. ..~- ..~-- S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ^ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ^ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; O All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; O A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable O ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): __ stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor ~_ ~ elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ X TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBFI or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ^ ~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The Bindings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ ~ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a fnal plat is provided); ^ ~ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; R ~~. ~F ~~ ~~f~.~m~mt l v...,-,, ~ r f S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of £3 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) a O SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; -__ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; -__._ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; ___ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening _ {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; ------ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ _ _ _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; _, Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; r_~ „~,~,,,..-fir Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; t ~ All open space areas; ~ ~i y. Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; '-, ""' Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ~ ' -- Streets and drives (dimensioned); ~ 4 ` d r # ~ ); Building and structural setbacks (dimensione f; ~ __ ~ ~ Structural overhangs; __ f ~' S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 'ri. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ _ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and __ __ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; __._ _- Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); j Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/~ X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) Materials ^ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 % X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8 '/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application, ~--~--------~--~.... ! ;_ }^j J S:\Planning DepartmentWpplication Forms\Development Review\2008 FormslComprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. O Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identifed in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONSI WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe andlor fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13; MFPA 14; NFPA 2.0: NFPA 291; and MFPA 1142 !Annex H1 iS raquirerl. ^ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Appli<znt must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/WaterScudy is included. Fire Flow CalculationsM/ater Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR ~ ., ..~'~~ ,I '~~C~' CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICA~I fJ 'I~71~~~f `"BF~~'^{ RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334 M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this app! ation. ,. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me thi~~ day of ~ , A.D. 20 to me and/or by ~ ,who is personally kn~ Q ~n ha~ produced ~ °._ - t(' L i CL as identification. oi~ar~public My commisslbn expires: {J r~~ ,r.- ~'?t~"'~"~° ~ ~' L'4mmissionA ~07A3521 es ~tc~. 2i:, ~JS i S:\Planning DepartmentWpplication Forms\Development Review\200F3 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Proj ct ( D 20 ~~'f°'d~~' ,~~_ Wm, Page 7 of 8 ~"'°~"`"- N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: HOMER PROPERTIES, INC. 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 387 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: lawful us by tenant, ART & WINE GALLERY OF CLEARWATER BEACH, INC. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; /~` , 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authorit~r:%fiereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ._ ,, ._ !- ' . ~ BY: RICH~LD r~'~'eff`~0~~; President Properly Owner HOMER PROPERTIES, INC. _ - - - Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS „ Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ~ _r(~~/_____ _ day of Novembe.r_, ,20.09 ______ personally appeared RICHARD C . HOMER, Pres . who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. "' DAVID BROVVDER, JR. *'tiK,r r •' ,~ MY COMMISSION # DD 895377 /~ i~~~~~ '~ ~o EXPIRES: July 26, 2011 ~~~Rf,,y~' BondedThNNOtaryPubf~cUndenvritetg _. _ _ _ Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: _ _ _ 387 MANDALAY AVE FLD2OO9-12043 ART & WINE GALLERY OF CLW BEAC s:~Plann Zoning: T atas# 26%?, i f n x. ! ~ d nprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc .. Th2l (i amn~ae are) tN:e, owner(s) and rscard t;tte rioider(s) of tha tollu~ving described property taddress or general tacation}: 387 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767 _ _ _ _____._ __-_. -_ __ 3, Thht this property coy"~stiAltr~s tees propariy for ti,hi:;h a request for a; (describs request) Change of use_ a_nd.._set...back_..t.Q.._ger>Tl~.~_.-C9F~.lic.ense_-... _.___ ..___._ ....___.....___ a. That the undersignsd (has:havE1 appointed and (does%do) appoint. ANDRE R. BRVENIK as Ihlsrtheir} agent(s) to rsxeCUte any pr_tibons or othdr dhGUments necessary to affect such petition: 5 That this aflYdaYt teas heen ex9cuteM to induce the Clty of G!aarwatQr, 1=lorida to consider and act bn the; above described property; 6. That site visits t~~ the property are nece=say by City representatives inorder to process this application and khe owner nutherizes (: ity repres@nG'1U•vas to visit and photo6raph the pr~a8rt'i' described in this appl`catlon; I 1. That fllwE), th° undersigned authority; Msar~ij csrtify that the foregoing is trv? and correct. i -- > ~ ~, ~' ~ . - ; i _-. --- - 6'rc~s~ercy C.ume+ ~ropprly Givner I BY- ROBERT,. C. HOMER, President y HQ~'iER P_.ROPERTIES,IN.C_. .------ - ---... ----_ .._ _ ...... __..... --...... . _ --Prop~rtY' ovmer Pr~p(5erty Qvvn~:r 5T"~7'~ Oar FLOI~Id~q COUNTY OF F°ItJEL.iJt.S % ~~ , 6efare me the undersigned, an o4ft~r dui Cgmrnissi~~ned by the laws or the beats of rlorlda, qn this ~-~~ day as Y ~ ._.. --..____._. ...-..__._....... December , .2009 persona;ly appeared ROBERT C . HOMER who havlna been first duly sworn Deposes and sTys that he/she fully undc+rslands the aantr~n's of fhe aff~'lavlt that halshe Signed, ~~_1 --~ / ~ ".,,~-p„~- P RTRICUA . REFDER % ,/~-- ~ ~ _.: :,r_ MY COMMISSION ~` DD 787ti57 ~ _-.-. ~ ~C,/:: ~- ~ L ic% '~' _...! . -~'~ ~ .. ti _ . -- _-- _.. _ ~:~= IXPIRES: June 10, 2012 ,_ ~ Notary PUbtiC $ignahrre -'~Rf, ~;~` banded ThN NoLry Pi~bNc lMdrrrwriurs / tVCtary $PaliStamp '• My Commisdibn Erpir~S: 5'~pl~nnin~t Dc~p;artnentWCrpliration i'orrn5lDevelopment Review120Ge FonnslGomurahenslvc Infiu S'roJcct (Ft_D') SOUS Q7 't1.CCc Page 8 of 6 ART & WINE GALLERY OF CLEARWATER BEACH 387'/2 Mandalay Ave Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Tel: 727-441-2400 To Whom It May Concern: Art & Wine Gallery of Clearwater Beach is a gallery where you will find wine from around the globe. We carry wines that are truly unique. A few of our wines have never been introduced in the USA until we opened our gallery. We are working with several Imports to file all documentations necessary to import exclusive wines from the world. We would like to have the privilege to sell wine by the bottles and also by the glass. We are different from your local wine bar in the way that we carry wines that most large distributors such as National and Sothern Wines will not carry. Our wine selection will vary every month. We will treat our wine like our art's. In the sense that we will feature new wine from around the globe weekly. Our Art selection will be from around the globe. We have paired up with several famous galleries from different parts of the world. This will allow us to exchange artist and give a chance for our local artist to have the ability to exhibit overseas. As we know our community has many talented artist that have no way nor the" know how" to exhibit there arts. This is why we will dedicate our experience and know how to assist the local artist. Our gallery will also Exhibit artist such as Paul Monsurroff, Jenkins, Picasso, Trecanni, Polluck, and ect.. I believe that this is a great way to give back to the community. This collaboration will benefit both our gallery and the city of Clearwater beach (Tampa Bay). Our Gallery will bring culture not only in the arts but in the world of wines. In the short time that we have been open we have already exhibited four local artists. In addition, we have also introduced 5 new wines into the Florida's market. Allowing tourist and resident to taste and experience wines that date prior to the Roman Days is truly a unique concept. Our gallery is unique. There is no other establishment like us in the Clearwater Beach and Tampa Bay. We bring paintings from few a few hundreds to a few million dollars. We allow our local artist to have a chance to exhibit in galleries across the globe. In the wine department we offer a unique range of wines that is not available anywhere in Clearwater Beach, Tampa Bay area. Clearwater Art & Wine Gallery Inc. is an asset in redeveloping the Mandalay Ave. We bring cultures in both wines and art to the area. We are not a typical wine bar where an individual comes to get intoxicated. We do not blast our neighbors with loud music nor do we provide that atmosphere for drugs and prostitutions. ART & WINE GALLERY OF CLEARWATER BEACH 387 % Mandalay Ave Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Tel: 727-441-2400 (1)In Reference, to the Fire marshal question the owner did tell me that the wall are fire 2 hour resistance that separate the occupancies. (2) The building 20 feet tall is'-1o" 81' 1 s' DATE: 02 FEBUARY, 2010 ART & WINE GALLERY I SK- OF CLEARWATER BEACH