11/18/2009
MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
November 18, 2009
Present: Douglas J. Williams Chair
Ronald V. Daniels Board Member
Phillip J. Locke Board Member
James B. Goins Board Member
Michael Boutzoukas Board Member
Sheila Cole Board Member
Kurt B. Hinrichs Board Member
Also Present: Caitlin E. Sirico Attorney for the Board
Camilo Soto Assistant City Attorney
Rosemarie Call Secretary for the Board
Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter
The Chair called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
The Chair outlined the procedures and stated any aggrieved party may appeal a final
administrative order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas
County within thirty days of the execution of the order. Florida Statute 286.0109 requires any
party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings.
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
2.1 Case 37-09
Foster New Bern, Inc.
601 Ft. Harrison Ave.
Exterior Surfaces – Ruud
No one was present to represent the owner.
Member Hinrichs declared a conflict of interest.
Inspector Alan Ruud provided a PowerPoint presentation. He said he was unable to
contact the property’s owner. A notice of violation was issued on October 13, 2009, following
the first inspection. Violations at 601 Ft. Harrison Avenue relate to deteriorating exterior
surfaces. Property photographs on August 3, 2009 showed an abandoned carwash with
deteriorating surfaces and graffiti.
Member Boutzoukas moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of
Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly
seconded. Members Daniels, Locke, Goins, Boutzoukas, and Cole and Chair Williams voted
“Aye”; Member Hinrichs abstained. Motion carried.
Code Enforcement 2009-11-18 1
Inspector Ruud recommended compliance within 15 days after the Order is issued or a
fine of $150 per day be imposed.
Assistant City Attorney Camilo Soto submitted composite exhibits.
Member Boutzoukas moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the
violation on or before 15 days after the Order is issued. If the Respondent does not comply
within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $150 per day for each day the violation
continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded. Members Daniels, Locke, Goins,
Boutzoukas, and Cole and Chair Williams voted “Aye”; Member Hinrichs abstained. Motion
carried.
This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on November
18, 2009, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and
received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that the exterior surfaces
are deteriorated and need to be repainted.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
3-1502.B
The Respondent(s) is in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) , as
referred in the Affidavit in this case.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of
the City of Clearwater Code by December 10, 2009. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply
within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the
violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the
Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Alan Ruud, who shall inspect the property and notify the
Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fail/fails to comply within the time specified, a
certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by
the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes.
Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order
resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with
the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the
filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in
determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear.
Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the
Code Enforcement 2009-11-18 2
execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this
Board to have a record of the proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED
this 18th day of November 2009, at Clearwater, Pinellas
County, Florida.
2.2 Case 38-09
Foster New Bern, Inc.
601 Ft. Harrison Ave.
Graffiti Prohibited/Removal Required – Ruud
No one was present to represent the owner.
Member Hinrichs declared a conflict of interest.
Inspector Ruud provided a PowerPoint presentation. He said he was unable to contact
the property’s owner. A notice of violation was issued on October 13, 2009, following the first
inspection. Violations at 601 Ft. Harrison Avenue relate to graffiti on exterior surfaces. Property
photographs on August 3, 2009 showed an abandoned carwash covered with graffiti.
Member Goins moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater
Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded.
Members Daniels, Locke, Goins, Boutzoukas, and Cole and Chair Williams voted “Aye”;
Member Hinrichs abstained. Motion carried.
Inspector Ruud recommended compliance within 15 days after the Order is issued or the
City abate the graffiti by entering the property and applying time and material costs as a lien on
the property and if the City cannot accomplish abatement, a fine of $150 per day for each day
the violation continues to exist.
Assistant City Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits.
Member Goins moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation
on or before 15 days after the Order is issued. If the Respondent does not comply within the
time specified, the City may abate the graffiti by entering the property and applying time and
material costs as a lien on the property and if the City cannot accomplish abatement, a fine of
$150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded.
Members Daniels, Locke, Goins, Boutzoukas, and Cole and Chair Williams voted “Aye”;
Member Hinrichs abstained. Motion carried.
This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on November
18, 2009, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and
received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that graffiti on the building
must be removed.
Code Enforcement 2009-11-18 3
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
3-1504
The Respondent(s) is in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) , as
referred in the Affidavit in this case.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of
the City of Clearwater Code by December 10, 2009. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply
within the time specified, the Board orders that the City abate the graffiti by entering the property
and applying time and material costs as a lien on the property and if the City cannot accomplish
abatement, a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. Upon
complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Alan Ruud,
who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fail/fails
to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be
recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a
lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida
Statutes.
Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order
resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with
the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the
filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in
determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear.
Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this
Board to have a record of the proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED
this 18th day of November 2009, at Clearwater, Pinellas
County, Florida.
2.3 Case 39-09
Victor Jevtic Living Trust
401 Palm Island NE
Boat in area between the principal structure and right-of-way – Franco
Victor Jevtic said the boat had been removed from the driveway.
Inspector Peggy Franco said she had issued two notices of violation for a boat, longer
than 20 feet, parked in the driveway at 401 Palm Island NE between the house and the right-of-
way. Property photographs on March 23 and September 29, 2009 showed a boat parked in the
driveway between the house and the right-of-way.
Code Enforcement 2009-11-18 4
Member Daniels moved to find that the Respondent(s) was in violation of the City of
Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Inspector Franco recommended no fine and requested a declaration of violation.
Assistant City Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits.
Member Daniels moved to enter an order that no fine be imposed against the
Respondent. If the Respondent repeats the violation, the Board may order a fine of $500 per
day for each day the violation continues to exist after the Respondent is notified of the repeat
violation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on November
18, 2009, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and
received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the testimony and evidence received, it is evident the condition existed;
however, it is further evident this condition was corrected prior to this hearing.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Respondent(s) was/were in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) 3-
1407.A.2.a, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case.
ORDER
It is the Order of this Board that no fine will be imposed against the Respondent(s). The
Board further orders that if Respondent(s) repeats/repeat the violation referenced herein, the
Board may order the Respondent(s) to pay a fine of $500.00 for each day the violation exists
after the Respondent(s) is/are notified of the repeat violation. Should the violation reoccur, the
Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing.
Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order
resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with
the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the
filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in
determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear.
Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this
Board to have a record of the proceedings.
Code Enforcement 2009-11-18 5
DONE AND ORDERED
this 18th day of November 2009, at Clearwater, Pinellas County,
Florida.
2.4 Case 40-09
Nestor Lira
59 Acacia St.
Public Health, Safety or Welfare Nuisance – Franco
No one was present to represent the owner.
Inspector Franco provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued
on September 17, 2009, following the first inspection. Violations at 59 Acacia Street relate to
the open-air swimming pool. Property photographs on August 31, 2009 show that water in the
swimming pool is green, allowing mosquitoes to breed. The home is not occupied. The pool
remains in the same condition today.
Member Cole moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater
Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded
and carried unanimously.
Inspector Franco recommended compliance by December 2, 2009 or a fine of $200 per
day be imposed.
Assistant City Attorney Soto submitted the PowerPoint presentation.
Member Cole moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation
on or before December 2, 2009. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified,
the Board may order a fine of $200 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on November
18, 2009, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and
received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that the swimming pool is
untended and the water poses a public health, safety or welfare nuisance.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
3-1503.B.5
The Respondent(s) is in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) ,
as referred in the Affidavit in this case.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of
the City of Clearwater Code by December 2, 2009. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within
Code Enforcement 2009-11-18 6
the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $200.00 per day for each day the violation
continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall
notify Inspector Peggy Franco, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of
compliance. If the Respondent(s) fail/fails to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of
the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida,
and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s),
pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes.
Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order
resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with
the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the
filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in
determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear.
Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this
Board to have a record of the proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED
this 18th day of November 2009, at Clearwater, Pinellas
County, Florida.
2.5 Case 41-09
Michael Eagle
Heather Eva
3333 Hunt Club Drive
Address Numbers (not visible) – Schaar
Case 41-09 was withdrawn.
2.6 Case 42-09
Michael Eagle
Heather Eva
3333 Hunt Club Drive
Exterior Surfaces - Schaar
Case 42-09 was withdrawn.
3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
3.1 Case 36-09 – Pending Order – Cont’d from 10/28/09
Michael Banner
3310 Waterford Drive
Roof Maintenance – Phillips
No one was present to represent the owner.
Code Enforcement 2009-11-18 7
On September 23, 2009, the board found the Respondent(s) in violation of the Code of
Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. Inspector Julie Phillips said property
owner Michael Banner was not present for his status report last month and had indicated he
could not attend today’s meeting. She said no proof has been submitted that anything has
changed; the roof still needs to be repaired and the house is full of mold. She recommended
compliance by November 25, 2009 or a fine of $100 per day be imposed.
Assistant City Attorney Camilo Soto submitted composite exhibits.
Member Locke moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation
on or before November 25, 2009. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified,
the Board may order a fine of $100 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on September
23 and November 18, 2009, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony
under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions
of Law, and Order:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that the roof requires
repairs.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
3-1502.D
The Respondent(s) is in violation of the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) , as
referred in the Affidavit in this case.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of
the City of Clearwater Code by November 25, 2009. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply
within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $100 per day for each day the violation
continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall
notify Inspector Julie Phillips, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance.
If the Respondent(s) fail/fails to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order
imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once
recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant
to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes.
Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board Order
resulting from a public hearing. A petition for rehearing must be made in writing and filed with
the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the Order and prior to the
filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in
determining whether to grant the petition to reconsider or rehear.
Code Enforcement 2009-11-18 8
Any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative Order of the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the Order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this
Board to have a record of the proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED
this 18th day of November 2009, at Clearwater, Pinellas
County, Florida.
3.2 Case 34-09 Affidavit of Non-Compliance
Colonial Bank
934 Eldorado Avenue
Fences - Franco
Member Boutzoukas moved to accept the Affidavit of Non-Compliance and issue the
Order imposing a fine for Case 34-09. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
4. OTHER BOARD ACTION
4.1 Case 31-09 – Request for fine dismissal
Errol J. Kidd & Jeraline Burt
904 Seminole Street
Delinquent Business Tax & Business Tax Receipt Required – McMahan
During the hearing, property owner Jeraline Burt requested that Case 32-09 also be
heard, even though her letter only requested Case 31-09 be considered for fine dismissal.
Inspector Janet McMahan said Ms. Burt owned several properties and was cited for this
same infraction in 2005, 2006, 2008, and 2009. The City opposed a reduction or dismissal of
the fine. Staff spent significant time verifying that utilities for both properties had been listed
under various names over a number of years. Staff provided Ms. Burt ample time to obtain the
necessary Business Tax Receipts. The properties are now in compliance. Fines for the
Delinquent Business Tax total $7,200 for each property.
Property owner Jeraline Burt said she was in the hospital when the board issued the
orders for these properties. She said her niece lives in the Jefferson Avenue property, which is
not a rental. She said she paid the Business Tax Receipt for that property under protest.
Ms. Burt said every time the City sent notice about the Business Tax Receipt for the
Seminole Street property, it was empty. She said she did not think a Business Tax Receipt was
needed for that property. She said after the last tenant moved out, she had kept the property
empty so her son could move in.
Discussion ensued with comments that fines are needed to recover City costs and to
serve as a deterrent. Opposition to waiving the fines was expressed due to past violations. It
was stated that City rules must be followed; Business Tax Receipts are required for rental
properties.
Member Boutzoukas moved to deny the request to dismiss the fine for Case 31-09. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Code Enforcement 2009-11-18 9
Case 32-09 – Request for fine dismissal
Sylvia R. Burt & Jeraline C Burt
710 N. Jefferson Avenue
Delinquent Business Tax & Business Tax Receipt Required – McMahan
See Case 31-09 for discussion.
Member Boutzoukas moved to deny the request to dismiss the fine for Case 32-09. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
5. NUISANCE ABATEMENT LIEN FILINGS:
Raquel Hetzel PNU2009-01493
903 Druid Rd. E.
15-29-15-59292-001-0110 $344.00
Trust No 1455 PNU2009-01711
c/o Orlan Asset Mgmt Inc, Tre
1455 Laura Street
14-29-15-38736-003-0190 $418.04
Kenneth L. Burridge PNU2009-01739
2630 Brewton Ct.
17-28-16-99201-000-0820 $516.38
Ali Sarican & Joshua Sams PNU2009-01759
425 Midway Island
08-29-15-43344-000-0560 $389.96
Lorenzo A. Bostick PNU2009-01781
705 Pennsylvania Ave.
10-29-15-69138-007-0090 $350.30
Jessica Maldonado & Theresa M. Siegrist PNU2009-01815
1629 N. Washington Ave.
10-29-15-26892-002-0070 $335.00
Matthew Horsey PNU2009-01858
308 Pennsylvania Ave.
10-29-15-72000-003-0020 $378.20
30 Days Real Estate Corp Tre PNU2009-01886
404 Pumpkin Trust
1404 Taft Ave.
10-29-15-51948-002-0060 $260.26
Code Enforcement 2009-11-18 10
..
Susan Dowe & Charlotte Ure
1117 Granada St.
03-29-15-47430-002-0190
PNU2009-02018
$335.00
Palm Bluff Street, LLC
1009 N. Garden Ave.
09-29-15-25542-004-0360
PNU2009-02113
$340.40
Palm Bluff Street, LLC
1011 N. Garden Ave.
09-29-15-25542-004-0370
PNU2009-02114
$312.50
Member Daniels moved to accept the Nuisance Abatement Lien filings. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 28,2009
Member Locke moved to approve the minutes of the regular Municipal Code
Enforcement Board meeting of October 28, 2009, as submitted in written summation to each
board member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
7. OTHER BUSINESS/BOARD COMMENTS:
Member Hinrichs was welcomed to the board.
8. ADJOURN:
.....
The meeting adjourned at 3:52 p.m.
4
l~
Chai
Muni ipal Code Enforcement Board
Attest:
!\.::.V1/1,1' ^ /)., #' /
...A. '~/J(tVlk- ( ~
Secretary to the Board
Code Enforcement 2009-11-18
11
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER lOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
CITY
MAILING ADDRESS
o?- '1 t lA lCS
LE"~A\\8L
1
C91<NTY
t-'\N~
c
NAME OF BOARD, COUN IL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
\CG
THE BOARD, COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON
WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
~CITY a COUNTY a OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: 0
C L 1.A It wAR-.r-
MY POSITION IS:
LAST N ME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME
\\'J(L\Ctf;:, ~
s\T
. L\11N
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRE
\ \
09
a ELECTIVE
)( APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 88
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other loeallevel of government on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other loeal public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed loeal officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the
parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or
163.357, F .S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law,
mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
*
*
*
*
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
. You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side)
CE FORM 88. EFF. 1/2000
PAGE 1
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
. The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
. You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
. You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I,_-k'^-ru b. t\\NR-\C \+> ,hereby disclose that on 1\J ~ U
,~
,20Ql:
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain or loss;
inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
inured to the special gain or loss of my relative,
inured to the special gain or loss of
whom I am retained; or
inured to the special gain or loss of
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
, by
, which
CASe
--S 7- 09
C458
?:::> <6 0- 09
MY CO.f,^-PPrtJy
l)o'-^J ~ n\(>
r-rftS 6\. veN A Q\AoTK
Co("V\rYI~\ d-L 2:,L~ ."
,,0 \~
! \ I, '3/0 'j
Date Filed I
~~
Sign'ature
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 9112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 88 - EFF. 1/2000
PAGE 2