WATER POLLUTION CONTROL INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT AND MASTER PLAN
~.
Jones
Edmunds &
roNS~~ciaJ!fJm~JFA
SHORT FORM CONTRACT
BETWEEN CLIENT AND ENGINEER
Jones, Edmunds & Associates, Inc. (JEA) (Engineer)
324 S. Hyde Park Avenue, Suite 250 . Tampa, FL 33606
Phone: (813) 258-0703. Fax (813) 254-6860
Website: www.ionesedmunds.com
Return Contract to:
Jones, Edmunds & Associates, Inc., ATIN: Contracts Management, 730 N.E. Waldo Road, Building A, Gainesville, FL 32641
Client (Show Street Address and Zip Code)
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, #220
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Attn: Mr. Robert Fahey
Date
Ma 29, 2003
Page
of 29
1. Scope of Work and Schedule:
See Attachments A and B.
Price (Check Appropriate Box)
D Fixed Price: $
2. Attachments:
~ Time & Materials: $ 340,136
Attachment A - Scope of Services
Attachment B - Schedule
Attachment C - Proposed Outline Phase I Infrastructure Assessment Report
Attachment D - Proposed Outline Phase II Master Plan Report
Attachment E - Compensation Rate Schedule
Attachment F - Breakdown of Engineering Costs
3. Documents Incorporated by Reference:
None.
Authorization and acceptance of this Contract includes acceptance ofthe terms above, including all attachments, the terms and conditions
printed on the reverse side, and all documents incorporated by reference. Terms of Payment: 0.00 % upon signature of Contract.
Invoices net 30 days from date of invoice; interest at 1.5% per month applied to all overdue balances beginning 30 days from date of
invoice.
This Short Form Contract is subject to the terms and conditions appearing on the reverse side hereof, including provisions limiting
remedies and disclaiming warranties.
Authorized: (Client):
Ci ofclearwate;~
Accepted (Engineer):
Signature:
Name:
Title:
Signature:
Name:
Title:
C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LFREESE\LOCAL SETTINGS\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES\OLK2\JEA-SF CONTRACT.DOC
Version: 060298
DJ_I;;.O-OO
(I)
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Short Form Contract Between Client and Engineer
1. Method of Payment: Monthly, Engineer will invoice Client for all Services
rendered during the previous month. Invoices will be due within 30 days after
receipt. Any unpaid charges will draw interest at the lesser of 1.5% per month or the
highest rate allowed by law, commencing 30 days after date of invoice. Client shall
notifY Engineer in writing of any disputed amount within 15 days after date of
invoice; otherwise, all invoice charges are agreed to be acceptable. Should it be
necessary for Engineer to initiate collection procedures for unpaid charges, the cost
of such procedures will be added to the amount due Engineer from Client. Fixed
price contracts will be invoiced on a percent complete basis.
2. Permit Assistance: Client shall assist Engineer in obtaining all necessary
governmental permits and/or approvals required for the performance of the Services.
Engineer's obligations hereunder are specifically subject to the issuance of all such
permits and/or approvals.
3. Standard of Care: The Services will be performed for the exclusive benefit
of Client. The Services shall be conducted by Engineer consistent with that level of
care and skill ordinarily exercised by the engineering and consulting professions in
the same locale acting under similar circumstances and conditions. Exceot as set
forth herein Ene.ineer makes no other reoresentation. e.uarantee. or warranty. express
or imolied. in fact or bv law. whether of merchantability. fitness for anv oarticular
purpose or otherwise concernine. anv of the services which mav be furnished bv
Ene.ineer to Client.
4. Deliverables: All deliverables, including, but not limited to, any and all
reports, drawings, plans, designs, and specifications prepared by Engineer hereunder
shall become Client's property upon final payment for Engineer's Services.
Engineer shall retain copies of all deliverables. Deliverables may not be used or
reused by Client, its employees, agents, or subcontractors on any extension of the
project or on any other project without the prior written consent of Engineer, which
consent will not be unreasonably withheld.
5. Limitation on the Scope of Services: Client acknowledges that Engineer has
not had any role in generating, treating, storing, or disposing of hazardous or toxic
substances, pollutants, and contaminants, or other waste materials ("Waste
Materials") which may be present at the Site. Any Waste Materials connected with
the Services shall at no time become the property of Engineer. Nothing herein shall
require Engineer to assume the status of generator, or a storage, treatment, or
disposal facility as those terms as defined by the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, or any state statute or regulation governing the generation, treatment,
storage, or disposal of hazardous waste or solid waste. If Services include the
transportation of Waste Materials from the Site, Engineer may evaluate and
recommend possible disposal sites for Client's use. Engineer cannot accept
ownership, title, or responsibility for Client's waste or responsibility for the disposal
of any Waste Materials. Client agrees that it shall evaluate and "select" the proper
site for treatment or disposal of its Waste Materials and shall be solely responsible
therefor. Arrangements made by Engineer for treatment, storage, transport, or
disposal ofany Waste Materials shall be construed as being made solely for Client's
benefit and Client shall indemnifY and hold harmless Engineer against all claims,
damages, losses, liability, and expenses, including attorney's fees, which arise
therefrom.
6. Limitation of Liability: The liability of Engineer and its employees to the
Client and all other persons and entities for damages due to acts or omissions arising
out of the services furnished under this Agreement, regardless of the theory under
which such damages are awarded or the type of damages awarded, shall not exceed,
in the aggregate, the amount of compensation paid under this Agreement.
7. Client's Indemnification: Client shall indemnify and hold harmless Engineer
and its shareholders, directors, officers, employees, and agents against all losses or
claims, and costs incidental thereto (including costs of defense, settlement, and
reasonable attorney's fees) which any orall of them may incur, resulting from bodily
injuries (or death) to any person, damage (including loss of use) to any property, or
contamination of or adverse effects on the environment, arising out of or which are
in any way connected with (i) any release or threatened release of Waste Materials,
or any other activity relating to the Waste Materials; (ii) the negligent acts or
omissions of Client, Client's employees, agents, and subcontractors, or (iii) Client's
breach of this Contract.
8. Required Disclosures by Client: Client shall provide Engineer all
information which is known or readily accessible to Client which may be reasonable
and/or necessary for completion of the Services by Engineer.
+,
9. Force Majeure: Neither party shall be responsible for damages or delays
caused by Force Majeure or other events beyond the control of the other party and
which could not reasonably have been anticipated or prevented. For purposes of this
Contract, Force Majeure includes, but is not limited to, adverse weather conditions,
floods, epidemics, war, riot, strikes, lockouts and other industrial disturbances;
unknown site conditions, accidents, sabotage, fire, loss of or failure to obtain permits,
unavailability of labor, materials, fuel or services; court orders; acts of God; acts,
orders, laws or regulations of the Government of the United States or the several
states, or any foreign country, or any governmental agency. Should Force Ml\ieure
occur, the parties shall mutually agree on the terms and conditions upon which the
Services may be continued.
10. Termination: This Contract may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30)
days written notice to the other party. Irrespective of which party terminates or the
cause therefor, Client shall, within thirty (30) days of termination, compensate
Engineer for costs incurred up to the time of termination, as well as those associated
with termination and post-termination activities, such as demobilization, modifYing
schedules, reassigning personnel, decontaminating and/or disposing of equipment,
disposal and replacement of contaminated consumables. At any time after the total
compensation payable to Engineer under this Contract exceeds $25,000, Engineer
shall have the right to suspend further performance of the Services until Client and
Engineer have executed a more comprehensive contract.
11. Site Access: Client grants a right of entry to the Site to Engineer, its employees,
agents, and subcontractors to perform the Services. If Client does not own the Site,
Client warrants that it has the permission of the owner of the Site to grant this right of
entry to Engineer. If, in order to perform the Services, Engineer damages or alters a
site owned by a third party, Client agrees to pay the cost of restoring the Site to its
condition prior to the performance of the Services.
12. Geophysical Services: Engineer does not guarantee any specific results from
sampling or analytical activity. Engineer shall not be liable for loss and/or damage to
the surface or subsurface due to subsurface sampling. Engineer shall not be liable for
damage to wells caused by subsurface trespass or from operational services. Client
will repair or replace any equipment damaged or lost in a well unless caused by
Engineer's gross negligence or willful misconduct. Recovery oflost equipment will
be Client's responsibility. Engineer is not liable for the accuracy of copies of the
original logs or for recommendations based on such copies. Engineer will provide
professional interpretation and recommendations if requested in writing. Engineer
shall not be responsible for obtaining permits or permission to log a well on a Site
owned by a third party.
13. Entire Contract: This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties and supersedes any and all prior written or oral agreements existing between
the parties. This Contract may be amended only by written instrument signed by
each party.
14. Precedence: This Contract shall take precedence over any inconsistent or
contradictory provisions contained in any Client-issued purchase order, requisition,
notice to proceed, or like document regarding the Services.
15. Survival: All obligations arising prior to the termination of this Contract and
all provisions of this Contract allocating responsibility or liability between Client and
Engineer shall survive the completion of Services hereunder and the termination of
this Contract.
16. Equal Employment Opportunity: If Client is required by law to obtain a
pledge of compliance from Engineer in its performance of the Services under this
Contract, Engineer agrees to comply with the Equal Employment Opportunity and
Affirmative Action Requirements of Executive Order 11246, Section 503, of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and/or the Vietnam Era VeteransD Readjustment Act of
1974.
17. Governing Law: This Contract shall be governed by, construed, and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.
C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\LFREESE\LOCAL SETTINGS\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES\OLK2\JEA-SF CONTRACT. DOC
Version 060298
~:;.
Attachment A - Scope of Services
Jones, Edmunds & Associates, Inc. (Jones Edmunds) detailed Scope of Services for
completing the asset management and master planning project is proposed as two (2)
phases: Phase I-Infrastructure Assessment, and Phase 2-Capital Improvements Master
Plan. A proposed project schedule for Phase 1 and Phase 2 work is provided as
Attachment B, with a proposed start date of July 2003, and project completion by August
2004.
Phase I-Water Pollution Control Infrastructure Assessment Report
The following work tasks are proposed for the Phase 1 Infrastructure Assessment:
Task 1. Kick-Off Meeting: Jones Edmunds will develop a kickoff meeting agenda and
distribute one week prior to scheduled meeting date. We will submit a list of required
A WTF data, reports, drawings and other information required so the City staff can begin
to assemble prior to the meeting. Key members of the Jones Edmunds project team will
attend the project kickoff meeting, including the Project Manager (Tom Friedrich),
Officer In-Charge (Mike Strully), Wastewater Discipline Manager (Steve Yeats), Asset
Inventory Team Leader (Buck Osteen) and the Regulatory Compliance Discipline
Manager (Bob White). Key items to be discussed at the meeting include the City's vision
and critical success factors for the project, schedule, and lines of communication.
Meeting minutes and an overall Project Plan will be prepared and distributed within one
week following the meeting.
Task 2. Data Gathering and Evaluation: This phase of the project involves obtaining
and evaluating existing wastewater facility data, reports, and facility record drawings.
This includes O&M performance reports, past feasibility reports, recently completed, on-
going, and proposed capital improvement projects, and past master planning and/or
growth projection and related facility expansion documents. The major work tasks to be
included under this phase include the following:
A. Current Flows, Loads & Performance. Establish current flows and loads,
and plant effluent quality for each of the three (3) A WTFs based on the last
two-years of plant data, to establish current performance for each facility.
B. Growth Pro' ections & Future Flows and Loads.
C. Summary & Review of On-Going & Proposed Projects & Past Reports.
Prepare a summary of on going and proposed capital improvement projects
(CIPs) at each A WTF based on discussions with the City and review of past
, '
reports and related documents. A summaryof the history and decisions for
implementing ,each CIP, _~_I
'. " ,. ',', .'" . will also be prepared.
D. Summary of Anticipated Regulatory Impacts. A summary of State and
Federal Regulations that may"" impact the City's wastewater
facilities over the next 1 O-years will be prepared based on input from senior
project team members involved with regulatory permitting committees, and
discussions with FDEP (SWD and Tallahassee) and EP A Regional Directors.
This includes but is not limited to water quality based effluent regulations,
TMDLs, NPDES, WET, and biosolids disposal regulations. The impacts of
various regulations will be evaluated and summarized for each of the City's
A WTFs, and evaluated under the alternatives analysis and the Cost-Benefit
evaluation section of the report. In addition, the potential impacts of EPA's
regulatory initiative of ''Nutrient Trading" in west-Central Florida will be
investigated.
E.
Task 3. Review Meeting No.1: The purpose of this first meeting is to review the initial
findings of the data gathering phase and discuss summaries of background information,
plant performance, proposed projects, regional projects and anticipated regulatory
impacts with the City to receive input and confirm accuracy. The projections for future
plant flows and loads will be reviewed and discussed with City staff to obtain agreement
on IO-year flow and load projections.
Meeting minutes will be prepared and distributed within one-week following the meeting.
Ten (10) copies of the following draft sections of the infrastructure assessment report will
be submitted to the City for review and comment within 30 days of the Review Meeting
as follows: Chapters 1,2,3,4 and 5 (See Attachment C for Proposed Report Outline).
Task 4. Water Pollution Control Infrastructure Assessments: This phase of the
project involves plant performance evaluations and plant inventory and assessment of the
existing equipment, unit treatment processes, structures, facilities, plant operations and
maintenance practices, and facility management and staffing at each of three A WTFs.
The major work tasks to be conducted are as follows:
~ '
A. Workshops-Plant Operability & Maintenance Issues. Three (3) one-day
workshops will be conducted at each of the A WTFs with lead operators, plant
and maintenance staff to identify and develop an understanding of operations
and maintenance issues at each facility that may be limiting facility
performance. Performance limiting factors will be divided into four areas:
design, maintenance, administration and operation. These workshops will
allow one-on-one interaction and discussion between plant operations and
maintenance personnel and engineering assessment project team.
Maintenance issues will be discussed to understand allocation of resources
and budgets, and provide information necessary for development of a
maintenance management plan for all three facilities. The results from each
facility workshop will be documented for input into the report.
B. Plant Management & Staffing Evaluation. Jones Edmunds will interview
lead operators, management staff, and conduct "operator shadowing" to
develop a detailed understanding of current staff operations and management
procedures. This information will be summarized for each facility, and
reviewed with the lead operators and lead coordinator to confirm current
staffing and management systems, and to make recommendations for
improvements or changes, and relate findings to improving facility operations.
C. Compliance Management Workshop. A workshop will be conducted with
lead operators, staff, laboratory staff, lead coordinator, and management staff
to discuss procedures and systems for implementing a centralized compliance
management system for all three (3) A WTFs. Outcome of the workshop will
be a set of recommended systems and procedures for maintaining effluent
discharge compliance at each facility, and maintaining the data in a
centralized digital file for centralized access and monitoring. The advantages
and disadvantages of various software and database management systems will
be discussed.
D. Asset Inventory & Conditions Assessment. This work will be completed
by a multi-disci lin team of en ineers specializing in the fields of
wastewater,
The same
team of specialists will be utilized at each facility for consistent and complete
evaluations. The goal of this sub-task is to determine if the major unit
treatment processes and associated facilities are adequate, marginal, or
inadequate for current and future operations, and required performance. Ten
(10) copies of an interim summary report will be produced for each facility for
review and discussion with City staff. The interim report will include a
summary of equipment, structures and facilities, and identify those factors at
each facility that limit plant performance, operations, compliance and
maintenance. The limitin factors will be rioritized by ma nitude of adverse
effects.
Task 5. Review Meeting No.2: The purpose of this review meeting is to discuss the
results of the infrastructure assessment work tasks outlined above, and receive input from
City staff to expand and/or modify initial results. Meeting minutes will be prepared and
distributed within one week following the meeting. Ten (10) copies of a draft of Chapter
6 of the infrastructure assessment report will be completed and distributed within 30-days
following this meeting.
Task 6. Wastewater Treatment Facility Upgrade Alternatives: Equipment and
facility rehabilitation, upgrades, replacement, or abandonment will be evaluated, based on
results of the infrastructure and conditions assessments, future regulatory constraints, and
identification of performance limiting factors. Alternative unit treatment operations and
facility upgrades will be identified and evaluated as follows:
A. Equipment and Facilities Cost Evaluation. The major equipment, unit
processes, and facilities summarized and evaluated in Task 5, will be
evaluated to determine costs of rehabilitation, upgrade, replacement and
abandonment. This analysis will be performed for major unit treatment
processes or equipment that were identified as deficient (performance
limiting), or that are key to current and future operations.
B. Alternative Treatment Options. Jones Edmunds will identify alternative
treatment upgrades and operations modifications based on identified
deficiencies and performance limiting factors. This initial list of alternatives
will be extensive and may include options that are not feasible for the City's
current facilities. The purpose of this phase is to identify feasible alternatives
for further evaluation during the pre-screening evaluation phase.
c. Workshop Pre-Screening Evaluation of Alternatives. The purpose of this
workshop is to pre-screen alternative treatment options, based on evaluation
criteria developed with City staff. The evaluation criteria may include issues
such as reliability, ease of operation, relative capital and O&M costs,
regulatory compliance, etc. The outcome of this workshop will be a list of
feasible alternatives for detailed evaluation.
D. Develop Selected Alternatives for Detailed Evaluation. The feasible
alternatives selected for detailed evaluation in the pre-screening workshop
will be developed for each of the representative A WTFs. This will include a
"planning level" basis of design and estimates of probable construction and
operation and maintenance costs for each alternative.
E. Cost-Benefit Analysis. A Cost-Benefit analysis will be conducted for the
alternatives selected for detailed evaluation, including operations and
maintenance improvements, to identify the recommended facility upgrades,
based on cost as well as compliance and related benefits.
Task 7. Review Meeting No.3: The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the results of
the cost-benefit evaluations for alternative wastewater upgrade alternatives, and
recommended upgrades, and receive input from City staff. Meeting minutes will be
prepared and distributed within one-week following the meeting. Ten (10) copies of a
draft of Chapter 7 of the Infrastructure Assessment Report will be completed and
submitted to the City within 30 days following this meeting.
Task 8. Prioritized Capital Improvements for Years 1, 2 and 3: Jones Edmunds will
prepare a prioritized list of the capital improvement projects (CIP) that are recommended
for implementation in the first three (3) years of the IO-year CIP. The prioritized CIP
will include budget estimates of capital costs for each alternative, inflated to mid-point of
construction. This prioritized CIP will be submitted to the City at the beginning of March
2003 to allow incorporation into upcoming years' budget planning.
Task 9. Infrastructure Assessment Re ort:
Task 10. Review Meeting No.4: The purpose of this meeting will be to receive City
and Peer Review Consultant comments on the draft infrastructure assessment report to
allow revisions and corrections prior to final submission to the City.
Comments to the draft infrastructure assessment report will be addressed, and copies of
the final report will be submitted to the City.
Phase 2- Master Plan Report
The I 0- Year Master Plan Report for the City will incorporate existing, planned and
recommended projects determined in the Infrastructure Assessment Report for the City's
three A WTFs. The major work tasks include the following:
Task 1. Capital Improvement Plan: The Capital Improvement Plan will incorporate
the following scope of work:
A. Coordination with Burton & Associates on Rate Structure & CIP.
A. Workshop to Prioritize A WTF Recommended Improvements. A
workshop with City staff will be conducted to prioritize the existing and
recommended capital improvement projects over the 10-year planning period,
based on need, facility compliance, and other constraints established for these
facilities during the project evaluations. Options for operational, as well as
capital improvements and phasing of projects will be discussed to determine
the most feasible approach to achieve the City's wastewater goals.
B. Development of Computer Model of Capital Improvement Program.
Jones Edmunds will develop a computer model of the capital improvement
program to allow the City to easily model alternate capital improvement
scenarios following the initial completion of the 10-year capital improvement
plan. As issues and priorities change, the CIP will be able to be modified to
determine if a new priority should be addressed under the current rate
structure and financing. The model will be developed in available software
such as Microsoft Excel, to allow the City to use the model for future planning
and decision-making purposes.
C. Cost Avoidance Opportunities. Cost avoidance opportunities created by
introduction of a new technology, or modification or improvement to an
existing process, or elimination of a facility or unit process will be identified
and discussed in this section of the report.
Task 2. Master Plan Report Preparation: Eight (8) copies of the draft version of the
Master Plan Report incorporating the identified work tasks listed above will be provided
to the City and Peer Review Consultant for review and comment.
Task 3. Review Meeting No.5: The purpose of this meeting will be to receive the
comments on the draft master plan report and computer model to facilitate revisions prior
to final submission to the City.
Comments to the draft master plan report will be addressed, and copies of the final report
will be submitted to the City.
Deliverables:
Jones Edmunds will submit eight (8) copies of the draft reports, and twelve (12) copies of
the final reports for the Water Pollution Control Infrastructure Assessment Report and
Master Plan Report. Two (2) digital copies (on computer disk) of each report will also be
submitted. A digital copy (on computer disk) of the computer model for the capital
improvement program will also be provided to the City of Clearwater.
Coordination with Peer Review Consultant:
Jones Edmunds has budgeted for the following level of effort for coordination with the
Peer Review Consultant: Task 1 - Kick-off Meeting, Task 5 - A WTF Upgrade
Alternatives, Task 10 - Draft Infrastructure Assessment Report, Task 11 - Draft 10- Y ear
Master Plan Report. Three (3) copies of deliverables for each task listed above will be
provided to Peer Review Consultant.
Presentations & Public Meetin2:s:
Jones Edmunds has budgeted attendance at one (1) public City Council Meeting, and will
prepare required presentations, graphics and handouts for meeting. Up to forty (40)
copies of handouts will be provided.
Proiect Mana2:ement & Reportin2::
Jones Edmunds' project manager will attend monthly meetings with the City's project
manager to provide an update on project status, identify potential roadblocks in progress,
and discuss projected work tasks and milestones anticipated in the upcoming month. A
one-page monthly project status report will also be submitted identifying work completed
and budget expended, along with monthly invoice.
Coordination Meetin2:s with Burton & Associates:
Four (4) meetings with Burton & Associates have been budgeted as follows: Kick-off
Meeting in Phase 1, Meeting to Review Prioritized CIP (Task 8), and two (2) meetings in
Phase 2 for implementation of overall CIP with existing rate structure.
Contin2:encv:
A budgeted contingency allowance of 10% has been included to allow the City to
authorize Jones Edmunds to complete evaluations or other work tasks not identified in
our Scope of Services.
Schedule:
Attachment B outlines the proposed 12-month project schedule, including meetings and
deliverables.
Attachment B
Proposed Project Schedule
Infrastructure Assessment and Capital Improvements
Implementation Master Plan
City of Clearwater, Florida
MAJOR WORK TASKS START FINISH 2003 2004
JUL I AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG
PHASE 1-WATER POLLUTION CONTROL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
TASK 1. KICK.()FF MEETING 7/01/03 7/01/03 ~
TASK 2. AWTF DATA GATHERING & EVALUATION 7/01/03 8/11/03
. Current Flows, Loads & Plant Performance 7/14/03 7/28103 ~
. Growth ProJecUons & Future Flows & Loads 7/14103 8/11/03
. Summary & Review of On-Golng & Proposed Projects & Past Reports 7/01/03 8/04103
. Summary of AntIcipated Regulatory Impacts 7/14/03 8111/03
. Summa";' of Reolonsl Prolects & Potential Teamln.. ARanaements 7/01/03 8/11/03
TASK 3. REVIEW MEETING WITH CITY 8/13/03 8/13103 ..a..
. D..ft Cha....... 1. 2. 3. 4 &. Infrastructure Assessment Reoort 9113103 9/13103 .
TASK 4. WATER POLLUTION CONTROL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENTS
. Northea.t AWTF 9/08/03 9/12/03 .
. Workahop Plant Ope..blllty & Maintenance
. Asset Inventory & Conditions Ass..ment
. Plant Management & Stalflng Evaluation
. Marshall Street AWTF 911 &/03 9119103 .
. Workahop Plant Ope..blllty & Maintenance
. Asset Inventory & Conditions Assessment
. Plant Management & Stalflng Evaluation
. ea.t AWTF 9122/03 9/26/03 .
- Workahop Plant Ope..blllty & Maintenance
- Asset Inventory & Condition. Assessment
. Plant Management & Stalflng Evaluation
. Conduct Compliance Management Workahop 1011/03 1011/03 "
. Summarize Inf..structure Assessment 9128/03 10/24/03 -
TASK &. REVIEW MEETING NO.2 11/0&103 1110&/03 . Ill. .
. D..ft Ch~;;;';r 6 . Infrastructure Assessment Re....rt 12/&103 12/&103
TASK 8. WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACIUTY UPGRAOE ALTERNATIVES
. Alternative Treabnent Options (All 3 Plantal 11/10103 12/19/03 ~
. Workahop Pre-Screenlng Evaluation of Alternative. (All 3 Planla J 1107/04 1/07/04
. Develop Selectsd Alternatives for Detailed Evaluation 1108/04 2/11/04
. Recommended Ope..tlon & Maintenance Improvementa 1108/04 2/11/04
. Co.t-Benellt AnalYSis of A1tematlve. 1108/04 2/18/04
TASK 7. REVIEW MEETING NO.3 2/2&/04 2/2&104 4l!: .
. Draft Chanter 7 - Inf..structure Asse..ment Reoort 3126/04 312&104
TASK 8. PRIORITIZED C1P /YEARS 1 2 & 31 FOR CITY BUDGET PROCESS 3/1104 4/14/04 - -
TASK 9. DRAFT REPORT AWTF INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT REPORT 7/01103 3124/04
TASK 10. REVIEW MEETING NO.4 4/07/04 4/07104 ~
. Address Comments on Inf...tructure Assessment Report 4/08/04 4/28/04
. Final Report Submlsslon-Inr..structure As.essment 4128/04 4128104 -:4
PHASE 2.MASTER PLAN
TASK 1. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN --
. Coordination with Burton & Associate. on Rate Structure & CIP 311/04 4/2/04
. WorkahopoPrlorltlze AWTF Recommended Improvements 4/14104 4114/04 ...
. Development of Dynamic Computer Model of Capltellmprovement Program 311 0104 6114/04
. Cost Avoidance O....ortunltle. 4/19/04 &/14104 ....
TASK 2. DRAFT-l0 YEAR MASTER PLAN REPORT 1/0&/04 &/28/04
TASK 3. REVIEW MEETING NO. & 8/18/04 8/16/04 "-
. Address Comments on Master Plan Report 8/17/04 7/14104 ~~
. Final Report Submission-Master Plan 7114/04 7/14104
& I <.~ <.~ <--.> 1 <. ~ <.'~ <.~ <.,'~ <.~ <.~ <.~ 1 <.'~ 1<'> <.~ 1<>
-~iPA
Attachment C
Proposed Outline
Phase I - Infrastructure Assessment Report
City of Clearwater
Executive Summary
Chapter 1 - Introduction
1.1 Background
1.2 Purpose & Scope
1.3 City's Goals
1.4 Report Organization & Related Documents
Chapter 2 - Summary of Existing Facilities & On-Going & Proposed Projects
2.1 Northeast AWTF
2.2 Marshall Street A WTF
2.3 East A WTF
Chapter 3 - Wastewater Flows and Loads
3.1 Existing Wastewater Flows and Loadings
3.2 Growth Projections
3.3 Projected Wastewater Flows and Loadings
Chapter 4 - Effluent Limits and A WTF Performance Requirements
4.1 Current Conditions and Plant Performance
4.2 Future Conditions/Water Quality Issues/Regulatory Issues
4.3 Anticipated Regulatory Impacts
A. Biosolids Disposal
B. Water Quality
C. Regulatory Initiatives
Chapter 5 - Regional Projects
5.1 Regional Biosolids Disposal
5.2 Wastewater Treatment
Chapter 6 - Asset Inventory, Conditions Assessment & Performance Limiting
Factors
6.1 Plant Operation & Maintenance Issues
6.2 Plant Management & Staffing Evaluation
6.3 Compliance Management
6.4 Assess Inventory & Conditions Assessment
6.5 Summary of Performance Limiting Factors
Chapter 7 - Evaluation of Alternatives
7.1 Equipment and Facilities Cost Evaluation
7.2 Identification of Alternatives & Pre-screening Criteria
7.3 Screening and Selection of Alternatives for Detailed Evaluation
7.4 Recommended Operation & Maintenance Improvements
7.5 Detailed Evaluation of Selected Alternatives
7.6 Cost - Benefit Analysis
Chapter 8 - Summary of Recommended Improvements
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Unit Processes and Facilities
9.3 Administrative, Operations and Management Systems
Executive Summary
Chapter 1 - Introduction
1.1 Background
1.2 Purpose & Scope
Attachment 0
Proposed Outline
Phase II - Master Plan Report
Citv of Clearwater
Chapter 2 - Summary of Capital Improvement Projects
Chapter 3 - Summary of Costs
ATTACHMENT E
COMPENSATION RATE SCHEDULE-Jones, Edmunds & Associates, Inc.
2003 AND 2004 BILLING RATES
ILABOR CATEGORY 2003 RATES 2004 RATES
A vera!!:e
Engineer 8 $ 162.00 $168.00 $ 165.00
Engineer 7 $ 142.00 $148.00 $ 145.00
Engineer 6 $ 129.00 $134.00 $ 131.50
Engineer 5 $ 106.00 $110.00 $ 108.00
Engineer 4 $ 90.00 $94.00 $ 92.00
Engineer 3 $ 80.00 $83.00 $ 81.50
Engineer 2 $ 69.00 $72.00 $ 70.50
Engineer 1 $ 59.00 $61.00 $ 60.00
Technician 5 $ 97.00 $101.00 $ 99.00
Technician 4 $ 77.00 $80.00 $ 78.50
Technician 3 $ 59.00 $61.00 $ 60.00
Technician 2 $ 50.00 $52.00 $ 51.00
Technician 1 $ 36.00 $37.00 $ 36.50
Administrative 5 $ 107.00 $111.00 $ 109.00
Administrative 4 $ 63.00 $66.00 $ 64.50
Administrative 3 $ 50.00 $52.00 $ 51.00
Administrative 2 $ 40.00 $42.00 $ 41.00
Administrative 1 $ 31.00 $32.00 $ 31.50
Note:
1. Reproduction costs will be billed separately without additional mark-up.
2. Costs for mileage and other travel-related expenses will not be billed to the City.
HOURS FEE TOTALS
TASK NO.1: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION & KICK-OFF MEETING Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.4) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB-TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $92.00 $60.00 $64.50
0 $0 $0
Project Initiation, Meeting Agenda, Request for Dala. Draft Project Plan 2 20 12 12 46 $4,838 $4,838
Data Collection Forms Development 1 4 24 4 33 $3,137 $3,137
Kick-off Meeting 8 4 4 16 $2,426 $2.426
Meeting Minutes,Final Project Plan 1 4 4 9 $929 $75 $1,004
Copy City's AWTF Drawings 4 6 10 $728 $1,000 $1,728
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 10 6 32 40 6 20 114 $12,058 $1,075 $13,133
Total Fee $13,133
Attachment F
Breakdown of Engineering Costs
HOURS FEE TOTALS
PHASE ,- INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT & Total Labor ODC's
PHASE II- MASTER PLAN Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.5) (Eng.4) (Eng.3) (Eng.2) (Tech. 5) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $108.00 $92.00 $81.50 $70.50 $99.00 $60.00 $64.50
PHASE 1- INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
TASK NO.1: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION & KICK.QFF MEETING 10 6 32 0 40 0 0 0 6 20 114 $12.056 $1.075 $13,133
TASK NO.2: DATA GATHERING, EVALUATION & SUMMARY 24 6 52 0 116 0 0 4 40 16 258 $26.168 $500 $26,668
TASK NO.3: REVIEW MEETING NO.1 AND DRAFT CHAPTERS 1 - 5 6 2 19 4 34 0 0 2 10 16 95 $9,499 $300 $9.799
TASK NO.4: INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENTS 72 80 168 64 88 32 96 56 4 48 708 $78,836 $300 $79.136
TASK NO.5: REVIEW MEETING NO.2 AND DRAFT CHAPTER 6 9 3 19 4 13 0 0 0 2 12 62 $6,941 $300 $7.241
TASK NO.6: AWTF UPGRADE ALTERNATIVES 40 68 120 108 200 40 0 0 32 20 628 $68,774 $300 $69,074
TASK NO.7: REVIEW MEETING NO.3 AND DRAFT CHAPTER 7 15 9 35 24 42 0 8 2 18 17 170 $17.777 $1,000 $18,777
TASK NO.8: PRIORITIZED CIP (YEARS 1,2 & 3) 8 0 12 0 16 0 0 0 0 6 42 $4,757 $0 $4,757
TASK NO.9: INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT REPORT 2 0 8 0 20 0 0 4 16 12 62 $5,352 $1,500 $6.852
TASK NO. 10: REVIEW MEETING NO.4 AND FINAL REPORT SUBMISSIO~ 10 4 18 0 28 0 8 0 12 20 100 $9,747 $1,500 $11,247
Subtotals 2,239 $239,908 $6,775 $246,683
PHASE II- MASTER PLAN
TASK NO.1: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 22 0 70 0 100 0 0 0 0 16 208 $23.067 $100 $23.167
TASK NO.2: DRAFT 10.YEAR MASTER PLAN REPORT 6 0 40 0 40 0 0 8 32 24 150 $14,190 $1,200 $15.390
TASK NO.3: REVIEW MEETING NO.5 & MASTER PLAN SUBMISSION 10 0 18 0 22 0 8 0 12 12 82 $8,099 $2.000 $10.099
Sublotala 440 $45,356 $3,300 $48,656
PROJECT MANAGEMENT & PUBLIC MEETING 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 16 141 130 $15,013 $250 $15,263
Totals I 2361 1781 7111 2041 759 721 1201 761 2001 2531 2,8091 $300,277 1 $10.325 1
Total Fee wtthout Contingency 1 $310,602
Contingency (10%) $29,534
Total Fee with Contlngency $340,136
HOURS FEE TOTALS
TASK NO.2: DATA GATHERING, EVALUATION & SUMMARY Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.4) (Tech. 5) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB.TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $92.00 $99.00 $60.00 $64.50
0 $0 $0
Data Collection, Develop Site Plans & Flow Schematics for Each AWTF 1 2 8 40 4 30 2 87 $7,512 $500 $8,012
Current Flows. Loads & Plant Performance (Last 2-Years) 2 8 16 2 28 $2,983 $2,983
Growth Projections & Future Flows and Loads 2 0 4 16 2 24 $2,457 $2,457
Review & Summary of On-Going & Proposed Projects at Each AWTF 1 8 8 10 6 33 $2,940 $2,940
Anticipated Requlatory Impacts 12 4 16 20 2 54 $6.633 $6,633
Regional Projects I Teaming Arrangements 6 8 16 2 32 $3,643 $3.643
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 24 6 52 116 4 40 16 258 $26,168 $500 $26.668
Total Fee $26,668
HOURS FEE TOTALS
TASK NO.3: REVIEW MEETING NO.1 AND DRAFT CHAPTERS 1 - 5 Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.5) (Eng.4) (Tech. 5) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB.TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $108.00 $92.00 $99.00 $60.00 $64.50
Agenda, Copies & Preparation for Review Meeting No. 1 1 1 4 3 9 $858 $100 $958
Review Meeting No.1 4 4 4 12 $1,618 $1,618
Meeting Minutes & Distribution 1 4 3 8 $885 $885
Draft Chapters 1,2,3,4 & 5 of Infrastructure Assessment Report 2 2 8 24 2 8 8 54 $5,074 $200 $5,274
Corrections to Draft Chapters based on City Comments 2 6 2 2 12 $1,064 $1,064
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 8 2 19 4 34 2 10 16 95 $9,499 $300 $9,799
Total Fee $9,799
HOURS FEE TOTALS
TASK NO.4: INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENTS Total labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reoroduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.5) (Eng.4) (Eng.3) (Eng.2) (Tech. 5) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB.TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $108.00 $92.00 $81.50 $70.50 $99.00 $60.00 $64.50
Internal Review Team Meeting, Preparation for WOfXshops & Assessments 8 8 16 8 8 8 8 4 12 80 $8.554 $100 $8.654
Wor1<.hop. (3) . Plant Operability & Malntenanco I..us. 24 24 24 24 4 100 $13,062 $13.062
Plant Managamant & Stafllng Evaluation (2 days at each WWTP) 6 4 8 64 4 86 $7,392 $7.392
Wor1<.hop (1) . Compllanco Managament 6 8 8 22 $3.202 $3.202
Asset Inventory, Conditions Assessment 24 24 96 48 48 24 48 4 316 $36.366 $36,366
Interim Asset Inventory Summary Report & Database Summary 4 12 16 8 8 32 24 104 $10,260 $200 $10,460
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 72 80 168 64 88 32 96 56 4 48 708 $78,836 $300 $79,136
Total Fae $79.136
HOURS FEE TOTALS
TASK NO.5: REVIEW MEETING NO.2 AND DRAFT CHAPTER 6 Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.5) (Eng.4) (Eng.2) (Tech. 5) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB.TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $108.00 $92.00 $70.50 $99.00 $60.00 $64.50
Agenda, Copies & Preparation for Review Meeting NO.2 1 1 4 4 10 $923 $100 $1.023
Review Meeting NO.2 4 4 4 12 $1,618 $1,618
Meeting Minutes & Distribution 1 4 3 8 $885 $885
Draft Chapter 6 of Inffastructure Assessment Report & Distribution 2 2 8 5 3 20 $2,326 $200 $2,526
Corrections to Draft Chapter 6 based on City Comments 1 1 2 4 2 2 12 $1.190 $1,190
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 9 3 19 4 13 0 0 2 12 62 $6,941 $300 $7.241
Total Fee $7,241
HOURS FEE TOTALS
.
TASK NO.6: AWTF UPGRADE ALTERNATIVES Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost ReprodudJon
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.5) (Eng.4) (Eng.3) (Tech. 3)I(Admin. 4)
SUB.TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $108.00 $92.00 $81.50 $60.00 $64.50
Equipment and Facility Cost Evaluations (From Asset Inventory) 4 20 24 40 80 40 4 212 $21,914 $100 $22,014
Alternative Treatment Options 20 24 20 20 16 6 106 $12.917 $100 $13,017
WOrkshop Prescreenlng Evaluation of Altematives 8 8 16 8 6 46 $5.835 $5,835
Detailed Evaluation of Selected Ahematives 4 8 40 40 80 16 188 $19.720 $19,720
Cost.Benefit Analysis 4 8 20 40 4 76 $8,388 $100 $8.488
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total HounJ 40 68 120 108 200 40 321 20 628 $68.774 $300 $69,074
Total Fee r $69,074
HOURS FEE TOTALS
TASK NO.7: REVIEW MEETING NO.3 AND DRAFT CHAPTER 7 Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.5) (Eng.4) (Eng.2) (Tech. 5) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB-TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $108.00 $92.00 $70.50 $99.00 $60.00 $64.50
Agenda. Copies & Preparation for Review Meeting NO.3 1 1 4 8 4 18 $1 ,403 $500 $1,903
Review Meeting NO.3 4 4 4 12 $1.618 $1.618
Meeting Minutes & Distribution 1 4 3 8 $885 $885
Draft Chapter 7 of Infrastructure Assessment Report & Distrtbution 8 8 24 20 32 8 2 8 8 118 $12.498 $500 $12,998
COtTections to Draft Chapter 7 based on CI1y Comments 1 1 2 6 2 2 14 $1.374 $1.374
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 15 9 35 24 42 8 2 18 17 170 $17,777 $1,000 $18,777
Total Fee $18,777
FEE TOTALS
TASK NO.8: PRIORITIZED CIP (YEARS 1,2 & 3) Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng. 8) (Eng. 6) (Eng.4) (Eng. 2) (Admin. 4)
SUB-TASKS $165.00 $131.50 $92.00 $70.50 $64.50
0 $0 $0
Meetings with City to Reviewl Confirm Prioritized Capital Improvements 4 8 2 14 $1,841 $1,841
Prioritized CIP (Years 1, 2, 3) 4 4 16 0 4 28 $2,916 $2,916
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 8 12 16 0 6 42 $4,757 $0 $4,757
Total Fee $4,757
HOURS FEE TOTALS
Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.6) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.4) (Eng.3) (Admin. 4)
SUB-TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $92.00 $61.50 $64.50
0 $0 $0
Intemal Meeting to Review Recommendations 0 $0 $0
Development I Recommendations for Maintenance Plen 0 $0 $0
Development I Recommendations for Compliance Management Plan 0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0
Total Fee $0
HOURS FEE TOTALS
TASK NO.9: INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT REPORT Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.5) (Eng.4) (Tech. 5) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB.TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $108.00 $92.00 $99.00 $60.00 $64.50
0 $0 $0
Draft Infrastructure Assessment Report & Distribution 2 8 20 4 16 12 62 $5,352 $1,200 $6,552
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 2 0 8 0 20 4 16 12 62 $5,352 $1,200 $6.552
Total Fee $6,552
HOURS FEE TOTALS
TASK NO. 10: REVIEW MEETING NO.4 AND FINAL REPORT SUBMISSION Total Labor ODC's
(INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT REPORT SUBMISSION) Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.5) (Eng.4) (Eng.2) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB.TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $108.00 $92.00 $70.50 $60.00 $64.50
Agenda. Copies & Preparation for Review Meeting No.4 1 2 2 5 $557 $557
Review Meeting NO.4 4 4 4 12 $1,554 $1,554
Meeting Minutes & Distribution 1 4 4 2 11 $1,188 $1,188
Corrections to Final Infrastructure Assessment Report & Distribution 4 4 8 20 8 12 16 72 $6.448 $1,500 $7,948
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 10 4 18 0 28 8 12 20 100 $9,747 $1.500 $11,247
Total Fee $11,247
HOURS FEE TOTALS
PHASE 2
TASK NO.1: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.4) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB.TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $92.00 $60.00 $64.50
Review Meetings with Burton & Associates (4 total) 8 16 8 4 36 $4,418 $4,418
Wor1<shop with City to Priorillze Recommended AWTF Improvements 4 6 12 4 26 $2,811 $100 $2,911
Development of Computer Model of CIP Program 6 32 80 4 122 $12,816 $12,816
Evaluate & Summarize Cost-Avoidance Oppurtunlties 4 16 4 24 $3,022 $3,022
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 22 0 70 100 0 16 208 $23,067 $100 $23,167
Total Fee $23.167
HOURS FEE TOTALS
PHASE 2
TASK NO.2: DRAFT 10.YEAR MASTER PLAN REPORT Total Labor OOC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Eng.5) (Eng.4) (Tech. 5) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB.TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $108.00 $92.00 $99.00 $60.00 $64.50
0 $0 $0
Draft 1G-Year Master Plan Report & Distribution 6 40 40 8 32 24 150 $14.190 $1,200 $15,390
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total HOUI1I 6 0 40 0 40 8 32 24 150 $14,190 $1,200 $15,390
Total Fee $15,390
I FEE TOTALS
PHASE 2 I
TASK NO.3: REVIEW MEETING NO.5 & MASTER PLAN SUBMISSION Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.6) (Eng.4) (Eng.2) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB.TASKS $165.00 $131.50 $92.00 $70.50 $60.00 $64.50
Agenda. Copies & Preparation for Review Meeting No.5 1 2 2 2 7 $741 $741
Review Meeting No.5 4 4 4 12 $1,554 $1,554
Meeting Minutes & Distribution 1 4 2 7 $820 $820
Corrections to Final Master Plan & Distribution 4 8 16 8 12 8 56 $4.984 $2,000 $6,984
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 10 18 22 8 12 12 82 $8,099 $2,000 $10,099
Total Fee $10,099
.,
HOURS FEE TOTALS
PROJECT MANAGEMENT & PUBLIC MEETING Total Labor ODC's
Hours Cost Reproduction
(Eng.8) (Eng.7) (Eng.6) (Tech. 3) (Admin. 4)
SUB-TASKS $165.00 $145.00 $131.50 $60.00 $64.50
0 $0 $0
Monthly Project Management (12-Months) 98 12 110 $13,661 $13,661
Public Meeting 2 16 2 20 $1,352 $250 $1,602
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0
Total Hours 0 0 100 16 14 130 $15,013 $250 $15.263
Total Fee $15,263
Signature page for Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc. Short Form Contract between
Client and Engineer dated May 29,2003. (02-0101-UT)
Countersigned:
Approved as to form:
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
By: ~i.S..u..~......-zr
William B. Horne II
City Manager
Attest:
.~~
UU:ynlhia E. Goudea
f) City Clerk