FLD2009-10040 - 740 ELDORADO AVE - MODANO RESIDENCEJ
.w
FLD2009-10040
740 ELDORADO AVE
MODANO RESIDENCE
PLANNER OF RECORD : MJJ
ATLAS # 249A
ZONING: LMDR
LAND USE: RU
RECEIVED: 10/30/2009
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC
CDB:
CLWCoverSheet
CDB Meeting Date: January 19, 2010
Case Number: FLD2009-10040
Agenda Item: D.1.
Owner/Applicant: Michael and Amanda Modano
Agent: Todd Bramuchi - Chancey Desi"~n Partnership
Address: 740 Eldorado Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for the construction of a new
single-family detached dwelling within the Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District with a lot area of 6,534 square feet, a
lot width of 60 feet, a reduction in the front (East) setback from 25
feet to 10 feet (to building) and a reduction to the rear (west)
setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to Costal Construction Control
Line) for an inground swimming pool and deck at existing grade as
a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community
Development Code Section 2-204.E.
CURRENT ZONING: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
CURRENT FUTURE Residential Urban (RU)
LAND USE CATEGORY:
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Single-Family Detached Dwelling
Proposed Use: Single-Family Detached Dwelling
EXISTING North: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District
SURROUNDING Detached Dwellings
ZONING AND USES:
South: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District
Detached Dwellings
East: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District
Detached Dwellings
West: Preservation (P) District
Water
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.15 acre subject property is located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 125
feet south of Bohenia Circle South. The property is presently developed with a detached dwelling
which is going to be demolished. The properties to the north, south and east are zoned Low
Community Development Board -January 19, 2010
FLD2009-100470 -Page 1 of 5
Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and are developed with detached dwellings. Land
to the west is zoned Preservation (P) District and is the Gulf of Mexico.
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to redevelop the subject property with single-family detached dwelling. The
request is being processed as a Residential Infill Project due to the requested rear (west) setback
reduction to the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) for pool and decking. The main
structure will maintain a 20-foot setback from the CCCL which is consistent with both houses
immediately adjacent to the subject property. As pursuant to Section 3-905.C.2 of the
Community Development Code (CDC), any requests to modify setback requirements from the
CCCL shall be considered through a Level Two development process.
The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the CDC is
discussed below.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-201.1, within the Residential Urban
(RU) land use category, the allowable ISR is 0.65. The site is in compliance as an ISR of 0.38 is
proposed.
Density: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-201.1, within the Residential Urban (RU) land use category,
the allowable density is 7.5 units per acre. As the lot area is 6,600 square feet (0.15 acres), one
dwelling unit is allowed and therefore, the proposed density is in compliance.
Minimum Lot Area: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects, there is
no minimum lot area. The lot area of the subject property is 6,660 square feet which exceeds the:
detached dwelling minimum standard of 5,000 square feet found in Table 2-202.
Tif'..;.~,,,,V, T + x ,ail,. D ,.. • t.. T.,L.1~ '1 '1(lA ~'+l,o !''Tl/'' F ,. D ~,,:,]„ F;.,1 T,..~:11 ~,. •L..._..
ivliuuuuui l..v~ `Jiuui. i lxiSuan~ w i avi~. c-c,v-r of ui~. ~,L~., ivi l~wiucn~iai uuiu Prvjc~i~, ilicic is
no minimum lot width. The subject property lot width is 60 feet which exceeds the detached
dwelling minimum standard of 50 feet found in Table 2-202.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, within the LMDR District, Residential
Infill Projects shall have a front setback between 10 - 25 feet, a side setback between zero to five
feet, and a rear setback between zero to 15 feet. The proposal includes a front (east) setback of
10 feet and a rear (west) setback of zero feet with no reductions to side setbacks and is therefore
compliant with the above referenced requirements.
The reduction in front and rear setbacks allows fora development consistent with the
surrounding and emerging development pattern. The existing detached dwellings immediately
adjacent to the subject property to the north and south are setback 10 feet or less from the east
property lines. With regard to the rear setback reduction, the development pattern along
Eldorado is moving from typical ranch style Florida homes toward larger homes occupying a
greater portion of lot area than the existing homes. In addition, a site visit and review of aerial
photographs show that several existing waterfront detached dwellings in the vicinity of the
subject property appear to have up to zero foot structural and building setbacks to the CCCL.
Therefore, the rear setback reduction to provide a typical amenity of a pool and decking for a
beachfront detached dwelling is justified and consistent with the emerging development pattern.
Community Development Board -January 19, 2010
FLD2009-100470 -Page 2 of 5
Maximum Building Heim Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill projects,
the maximum building height in the LMDR District is 30 feet. The building height of the
detached dwelling will maintain a maximum building height of 30 feet as measured to flat roof
height, which is consistent with the above.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill
projects, two parking spaces are required. The proposal is to provide two parking spaces for the
dwelling, which is consistent with the above.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, air conditioning and similar
mechanical equipment is exempt from the side and rear setback requirements, but such
equipment must be screened from view from streets and adjacent property. Outside condensing
units for air conditioners as well as pool equipment will be placed adjacent to the side of the
dwelling. Compliance with screening requirements will be reviewed at time of building permit
submittal.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1908.A, all utility facilities, including but not limited to gas,
water, wastewater collection, electric, telephone and television cables, except major transmission
lines and transformers, shall be located underground. This proposal will comply with this
requirement.
Solid Waste: The dwelling unit will be provided a black barrel for solid waste disposal which
will be stored exterior to the dwelling. CDC Section 3-201.D.1 requires these black barrels to be
screened from view from streets-.and adjacent properties. Provisions for walls,_fences ar other
appropriate screening materials will be reviewed at time of building permit submittal.
rnrlP En_ffnrCPlnPnt Analvsigc There are nn rnttctanrlipDa Cnrle Fnfnrrement iccnPC aSgn~ia?Pd
with the subject property.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the detached dwelling subdivision proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables
2-201.1 and 2-204:
Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent
Density 7.5 du/ac 1 du/ac X
ISR 0.65 0.38 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 6,600 square feet X'
Minimum Lot Width N/A 60 feet X'
Minimum Setbacks Front: ] 0 - 25 feet East: ] 0 feet X'
Side: 0 - 5 feet North: 5 feet X
South: 5 feet X
Rear: 0 - ] 0 feet West: Zero feet X'
Maximum Height 30 feet 30 feet X
Minimum Off-Street 2 spaces per dwelling unit 2 spaces X
Parkin
' See Annlysis in Staff Report
Community Development Board -January 19, 2010
FLD2009-1 00470 -Page 3 of 5
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-204.E
(Residential Infill Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity
or other develo ment standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project X
will not materiall reduce the fair market value of abuttin ro erties.
3. The uses within the residential infill ro ect are otherwise ermitted in the district. X
4. The uses within the residential infill ro~ect are com atible with ad~acent land uses. X
5. T'he development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project X
will u rade the immediate vicinit of the arcel ro osed for develo ment.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which X
enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
develo ment and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access X
or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character
and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards
for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coves e, densi and character of adjacent ro erties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildin s or si nificantl im air the value thereof.
3, The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the nei hborhood.
4. The ro osed develo ment is desi ned to minimize traffic con estion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, X
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of December 3, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally
sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the
following:
Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 0.15 acres is located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 125 feet
south of Bohenia Circle South;
2. That the property is developed with a detached dwelling which is to be demolished;
3. That the proposal is to redevelop the subject property with asingle-family detached dwelling;
Community Development Board -January 19, 2010
FLD2009-100470 -Page 4 of 5
4. That the proposal includes a reduction of the rear setback from the Coastal Construction
Control Line (CCCL) of 10 feet to zero feet;
5. That pursuant to CDC Section 3-905.C.2, any requests to modify setback requirements from
the CCCL shall be considered through a Level Two development process; and
6. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-201.1 and 2-
204 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
204.E of the Community Development Code; and
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development application for the construction of a new single-family detached
dwelling within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with a lot area of 6,600
square feet, a lot width of 60 feet, a reduction in the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet
(to building) and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to Costal
Construction Control Line) for an inground swimming pool and deck at existing grade as a
Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-
204.E with the following conditions of approval:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and colors of the dwelling unit be consistent with the elevations
approved by the CDB;
2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a separate right-of--way permit must be
approved for the instaiiation of the brick paver drive apron;
3. That there are no obstructions in the waterfront site visibility triangle;
4. That pool and deck not be constructed higher than 12 inches above existing grade;
5. That vehicles cannot be parked in the driveway blocking the pedestrian access to the concrete
sidewalk;
6. That black barrels stored exterior to the dwelling and outdoor mechanical equipment
including air conditioning and pool equipment be screened from view from adjacent streets
and properties; and
7. That all utility facilities, including but not limited to gas, water, wastewater collection,
electric, telephone and television cables, except major transmission lines and transformers,
shall be located underground, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: /t~~~
Matt Jackson, Planner II
Attachments: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S: (Planning DeparhnentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cnsesl Up for tlae next CDBIEIdorado 740 Modnno Residence (LMDR) -
01.19.10 CDB - MJIStnff Report 2010 0/J4.doc
Community Development Board -January 19, 2010
FLD2009-100470 -Page 5 of 5
Matthew Jackson
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727) 562-4836
matthew . iackson~mvciearwater.cam
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
^ Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 2008 to Present
Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and
variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of
development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning
assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning
ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review
committees, boards, and meetings.
^ Planner I
Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007
Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances.
In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained
submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead
project kick-off meetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting
documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject
matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs.
Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made
disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities.
^ Manager
Cii%ircil uti"eci Eiitcrtainment, Orlando, Florida .riepteiiibeY i 999 t0 Febiiiai f% 2vv4
Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment
complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and
inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and
delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing
and special events.
^ Linguist
US Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995
Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military
readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering
operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian
authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison
between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training.
EDUCATION
^ Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007
^ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004
z
a ;, ~,
0
~¢
5
G4RCENIA ST ~ ? z
_ ~~ ~z~
6
~F/4/q VERBEtdA y
0
D~ a D
p MANGO ~ w
PROJECT ~ z
SITE ~~-
w
goN~~~p, ~
~
0°
Q
IRIS
'u>
r
O C'I'E! ~ Z
~ ~
ASTER
O ACACW ST
r
SOA~ERSET ~ Z
O O
CAMiBRIA
Q
IDLE Lti'I LD
pp,S~C'~
GLE
ROVAL ~:^AY ~Fi6~R
O
iiEIL W DOD
O eAY
AVALON Q
N
~
O 9 04
ucnlnp,LL luan¢a ~ ~
8AY ESPLANADE ~ N~ PpyM
1 ~
1ST'
Rocw,wraY ~ Pp,~M
~ S~
Amb15r
LOCATION
Owner: Modano Case: FLD2009-10040
Site: 740 Eldorado Ave Property Size: 0.15 acres
PIN: 15-29-15-54666-003-0030 Atlas Page: 249A
778 779 7 10770 7835
12
8 9
~ _ L5466 ,
d
d 9
6 775 tt
6 784 a 15
75 s 785 a 13 784 y z
770
O
4
771 5 11 ~0
3 783 760
td5 781 ' to °
i c
i
788
785a t3 758 7F3
2
00 6 75
so 75
Z
n
6
71z8~
~Cl
J
h
~7Sf~
ll 1~W ~^a _ .
.
t
751
752
5 is
D 759
751
-
i5
757 754 ~ 751 17750
a < a
2 758 2 -
750 6 C 7 m
t ~ 7551 t6
IR S ~~ m 3 1748
' D 741 3
7
A C
BCNENIA
7413 ,g
1a 740 m 2
6
38 ~
n
C 742 737
1 zo ,
750
5
O
tz
11
2 738
s ~
$ IRI$ ST
744 C
m 745 733 t t0 734
a
Water 3 10 13
.................
~gta hsc~
1 ' ~~ 32 729 h h
O
" 730 '~ 1 ~ ~ 5 '^
............:................................................... ~ s A
r 2
2 738 739 8 15 728 Z 729
D e `~ 25 ~
t 734 735 ~ 12 r 725 g ~ 3 3
724 n 7 724 A
$ '~ 723
g 17 ` 727 13 4
10 720 23 O
O q
730 5 t8 718 Rl 719 5 11718 5 ~
721 a 5
g 2F0712 ~ ASTER ST
t9 NOS-2 -151ROR~AR ELI
~ 2 a
1
y 710 so 711 3 13 60 ~ °' ~" 10
6
ac 709
707 70 0
6 3
9
„
5 719 705 2 ta704 718
a 12 E -29-15 OR ARCEL
22 so
1 ~~ 15 705 5
700
2 12
712
~ 707
23 701 ~ 6
t6
m 4 0
"~ 701 m m 0
"~ `O 1
710
3 2 $ ACACIA ST
$
2 ~ 1 I
N ~. N
ra~+l "~' R RI s V R ~ 1
N
m
1 d
70f 14 ~ 2 1 ~ 10 ~ 66 _J 5 4 3 2
~ 3 9 B 7 ~
EXISTING
Owner: Modano Case: FLD2009-10040
Site: 740 Eldorado Ave Property Size: 0.15 acres
PIN: 15-29-15-54666-003-0030 Atlas Page: 249A
766 785
756
757
752
d
760 761 754 751 ~ h a
754 750
751 ° o
2
756 757 750 C
755
G'R
A
P
s ~,~ 750 m 745
n 746
740 n
n 741
O~GN~
G
f~ ~ 0 m 74, m
B 741
742 737 738
750 7 736
m IRIS ST
744 Q 745 738 733 734
0
a
7
3
732
J 732 729 "u~ ~
4 ~v
~ 730
0 ~ sr 727
736 739
726 729
m 3 725
734 735 n 725
L 724 z 724
723 723
p 1~ 721 720
730 725 718 ~ 719 716
h ~
n 72,
721 712 m ,,, ASTER S T
712
710 7n ~
7pg 708 7
709
706 707
719 705 704
718
712
705
701
701 700 712
~ `~ `b 701 $3 ~ "~ `g 710
708 ACAC/q ST ACACIA ST
N `~ M ~ `~ ~ a e v ~n v°3 (o
704 W
'
695
676 Q ~
r N J
Q 675 36
°~ $ ~ ~ ~
~ F'o 692
Z
N N ~ SOMERSET ST
ZONING
Owner: Modano Case: FLD2009-10040
Site: 740 Eldorado Ave Property Size: 0.15 acres
PIN: 15-29-15-54666-003-0030 Atlas Page: 249A
R q ~ 1~ Ytl ~~ ~,
y- ~
„,
~• o
1
t .
• -.
'a.. 'i ~
i
,~~ ~ ~, ~ ,
AERIAL
Owner: Modano Case: FLD2009-10040
Site: 740 Eldorado Ave Property Size: 0.15 acres
PIN: 15-29-15-54666-003-0030 Atlas Page: 249A
740 Eldorado
FLD2009-10040
View from southeast corner of property looking west.
View from northeast corner of property looking west.
View from rear (west) property line looking north.
View from rear (west) property line looking south.
View from front (east) property line looking north.
View from rear (west) property line looking east.
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
~~ P ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE~PL^AN: $200.00
SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ~/~. ~~
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY- (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Residential Infill Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT
A~ APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICgNT NAME: ~ a v
MAILING ADDRESS: ~ 'r
PHONE NUMBER: ~~Of ~L~- $ggzj FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: n~D~~ C~p~
PROPERTY OWNER(S): G
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: _ ~ ~ '' 101,7 ~7 V~
MAILING ADDRESS: Z$ '~' (/Q
PHONE NUMBER: .2 2~__-w.._ FAX NUMBER: ~~~~,~~ ~. ~~
CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: ~R.~__M~(~ Li ~~,~_
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: ~~ ~ ~ G PROJECT VALUATION: $ ~DOD,oo
STREET ADDRESS (]
PARCEL NUMBER(S): ~ p
PARCEL SIZE (acres): p . L~~~ ~ ~-; ;--; -•-- PARCEL SIZE (square feet): ,_~~ fj~_,_,~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I .,~-1- 2 ~ ,~i1~ ~ IV\A~IL)I~~J4~ .'l~'s~' d'~ d•t- ~iv/IG ~• Dl/.
PROPOSED USE(S):
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Specifically identify the request
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
C:1Documents and Settings\derekfergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708V2esidential Infill Project (FLDj 2008 07-11.doc
Page 1 of 8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO (if es, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C._ PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP
(see page 7)
D. _WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which
it is located.
S f On S _~ tl G~ I I ~.~. ~ o
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
5 -'rB~
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
~......~i~'.C.~~~........~.ECG.~..Itll.t~.....~.....!!u.~~.~..~~1~''IV....~.......n~...!~at~....~.L~n1..4..~...~?.~ ..................~-
tN
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
~ W 1NStl t n
C:\Documents and Settings\derakferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 2 of 8
N SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria)
T
E
WRIT
~
~
j
Prodfde complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
t. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
7 0
~~~~ ~ ~ ~S V~~
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
of the site with the improvements.)
u
e
properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed val
'
'
,
3. The uses within the residential in~filllproject are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The uses o~r~//m{i~~x(~ofWyu~s~eyVw~i!~th~i~n the resid`en~tiyal'infill p~{r(~oject are compatible with adjacent land uses.
........J...(I.F.x.}.lf.`.!..'.-.f.~......~~J.T~I~......-......~..... ~r.`.'~..'.D.~~....S..IN.~~.~?:~....~.G1...~~..N....r/..'~ ............................
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
,~~ ~~,.- UM UJ t MA ~J (~~Lt-~S D~ V-'~o N'~ Ip€NG~
~' ~' ....'~...!~~ ............. ........... . 5..................
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
N...r.~s...~?°r~-
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
'.~ 1
p~ t 7 ActJl~ U
.................... ~ ......_...~~._........'...---~N.~M..~-.~........... V 1.GlN.~`C.~. ~.................-----......................................
C:\Documents and Settings\derekferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
~Jylanual and 4-202.A.21)
^ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exe~`m~pti~onLto this requirement.
^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ~ ~~ J`~'~"N ~>
^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; W ~~~,~ N~ ~~
^ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ~ ~~s "~11~~%
^ All adjacent streets and muniapal storm systems;
^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
^ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
^ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
W. Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
~~ elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~~SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies;
ifREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees;
^ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and
condition of such trees;
R(~LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ~ ~~~ ~~`~~~
^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
C:\Documents and Settings\derekfergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708~Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
-~(~ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
_~___ North arrow;
. Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
~j ~ All dimensions;.
11 ~ ~ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
~~ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
~~ All required setbacks;
-{~_ y,~ All existing and proposed points of access;
~~/~ All required sight triangles;
//// Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
'(rlx description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
'F;~ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
,,~1 ~ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
~ q_~ and water lines;
X All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
N~ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
~1 N ~ {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701};
jy ~_ . Location of all landscape material;
~~ N p!... Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
N A Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
~~ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level One (flexible standard development) and Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is
~~((~-~ required for any parking garage requiring a Level One (minimum standard and flexible standard) or Level Two approval.
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
~l~
~~
~x Land area in square feet and acres;
.!~ ~ Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
~~X Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
~~_ Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
~1C number of required spaces;
~~ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
_ easement;
~~ Building and structure heights;
~~ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
~~i.L1~ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
~ t~! REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 YZ X 11);
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
......................................
2vo e S,-~_ -~--d
2 ~~. s~.c:~~~ .............................:...... t~o,~..?~~
.................
......D... L..2 ................... .......Q..~.lrr~....1 ...........~$.........
-~-----~~'r
~ ~~ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
~.. Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
~.... Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
C:\Documents and Sett(ngs\derekfarguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 07081ResidanUal Infill ProJed (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page5of8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)~ ~~~ ,~-(,EL,S~N
^~NDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): C~o-~ ~ Z0~ ~`~
All existing and proposed structures; S rtt'IS ~ ~ ~~
. Names of abutting streets; ~~ -~,( ~~ ~ "~ " l f v` l i
___ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; L~l„'~',~ ~ ~,w>G,.
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; T/~ Q~~ ~G~ (~W
.._...... Sight visibility triangles; 'T 1 ~~~ l~~r~"
_ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
_- Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
_ _ schedule;
~~~ ~~~ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
___ Irrigation notes.
^ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11);
^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information;
All sides of all buildings;
/~ Dimensioned; ~,.~+
,...-.... Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); `~ ~+ ~ ~` 1 ~~ ~~~
~f ... Materials;
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 Y~ X 11.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ~ ~ `~Q~~1(~~~~~~j~' p~ ~p ~~(~~~G
^~All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and aimelisl Jrea, h- eight, etc.), indicate het er~~M~Gffl be
removed or to remain.
^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
^ Reduced signage proposal (8 Y~ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 07061Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-t t.doc
Page 6 of 8
K~TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
~ "Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager orhis/her designee or if the proposed development:
Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
^ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
~ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each fuming movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
~~~~~~ Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC
IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED
AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
~ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
~~~~~~ Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
p tograph th property described in this application.
,(~~,~/ ~
Signature of o rty owner or representative
-{-~,11sl~oro ugh
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF~~*-*__.":"
Sworn o and subscribed before me this ~ day of
(~pVjU/ , A. D. 20~ to me and/or by
who is personally known has
produced
as identifi on. ~ -~~
~ .. DESIREE A. PEAEZ
~ ~,~~.'.'-IGIY 6DMMISSION # DD 5E
My
Notary
C:tDocuments and Settings~derekfergusonlDesktop~planning dept fortes 0708~Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doe
Page 7 of 8
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
i . Provide names of ail property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
2. That {i am/we are) the owner{s}and record title hojder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: {describe request)
4. That the undersigned (has/itave) appointed and {doss/do) appoint
as (his/their) agent{s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the Cjfy of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
ii. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives inorder to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives Mvisit and photograph the properly described in this applicaton;
7. That (Uw ), the de gnetl authority, hereb rtify that the foregoing is true and correct.
- - - ••-•----•------- ~ rty -- - ------------
Property Own r Pro a Owner
~.~w~'Property Owner ~~,~~~ Property Owner -~~~
STATE OF FLORIDA
couNTY of was -~Il~xv JIB
Before me the undersigned, an officer duty commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this zzln~ day of
~L~lrj,(,~ Z ODD( personally appeared /1rtt~~~l.__ /~1~Q~~.~,1!1.iJ ................. who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
ti;;:. ;~ y"~••,.,~, DESIREE A PEREZ
:yR' •~•.
_*. ,~ MY COMMISSION # DD 580667
^. 1,,= EXPIRES: August 16, 2010 ~,,
~~Pf Bonded ThN Notary Public Undenvdters
Notary Seal/Stamp
My Commission Expires:
ld
C:Ubcumenls and SetOngsiderekfargusonWesktop\planning deptforms 470B1Residenllal IntiA Project (FCD) 2008 07•t t.doc
Pate 8 of 8