09/28/2009
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
September 28, 2009
Present: Trustee/Chair Frank Hibbard, Trustee Paul Gibson, Trustee George N.
Cretekos, Trustee John Doran, and Trustee Carlen Petersen.
Also William B, Horne II - City Manager, Jill S. Silverboard - Assistant City
present: Manager, Rod Irwin - Assistant City Attorney/CRA Executive Director, Pamela
K. Akin - City Attorney, Cynthia E. Goudeau - City Clerk, and Rosemarie Call -
Management Analyst.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 9:00 a.m. at City Hall.
2. Approval of Minutes
2.1 Approve the minutes of the August 31, 2009 CRA Meeting as submitted in written
summation by the City Clerk.
Trustee Carlen Petersen moved to approve the minutes of the August 31, 2009 CRA
Meeting as submitted in written summation by the City Clerk. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
3. CRA Items
3.1 Authorize the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the development of
the parcel bounded by Chestnut Street and Prospect Avenue
(15/29/15/16830/003/0070)
The City has received numerous inquiries over the years regarding the city-owned
parcels on Court Street and Prospect Avenue. The adjacent, privately-owned site
at 915 Court, a former Texaco station, is under environmental remediation and
monitoring. Because of the environmental concerns, it has been the city’s
preference to wait until the site was “clean” before pursuing any development
options for the site. However, staff has indicated to interested parties that should a
desirable development proposal for the city site come forward before the
scheduled remediation is completed, we would consider disposition of the city-
Community Redevelopment Agency 2009-09-28
1
owned property.
Economic Development staff has been working with Aurora Lighting Inc. for
several years to assist them in locating a site for a corporate headquarters. After
review of several sites, Aurora purchased 915 Court Street for this purpose. They
have expressed interest in purchasing a portion of the city’s property (the upland
portion located adjacent to their property) to be able to have enough land to build
a signature building and parking for their company. In addition, they would also
like to upgrade the landscaping on the remaining portion of the city’s site,
currently a stormwater retention area. Their headquarters office use would have
approximately 20 jobs (with an average wage above $50,000/year), the proposed
20,000 square foot building will increase the tax base and the project will be an
overall benefit to the area, complementing surrounding projects. Aurora is
anticipating a $4-5 million construction project. After a preliminary review of the
proposed project, their initial concept seems viable and worth our effort to pursue
further.
Property Description
The site is located in the Town Lake Residential District of the Downtown
Clearwater Redevelopment Plan and is zoned Downtown (D) with an underlying
Central Business District (CBD) land use designation.
The city owns two parcels directly adjacent to 915 Court. The southern, upland
portion contains approximately 44,940 square feet bounded on the south by
Chestnut St., on the west by Prospect Avenue. This upland portion contains
groundwater monitoring equipment for 915 Court. The northern parcel contains
approximately 12,840 square feet and is currently used as off-site stormwater
retention.
Background on Environmental Issues
The parcel located on 915 Court Street (also a former dental office) has
documented soil and groundwater contamination from leaking underground
storage tanks at a former Texaco Station located on the corner of Court and
Chestnut. Even though some of the petroleum constituents from this Court Street
Texaco station have been removed, it has impacted the surficial aquifer on the
property. The City’s property to the west (upland portion) has been part of the
remediation project addressing this contamination.
The clean-up of this site is being conducted under the FPLRIP Program and
FDEP, under the State Early Detection Incentive (EDI) program, for which the
State ranks and then takes on the responsibility of any cleanup. The City is not
involved in the clean-up process.
In summary, the groundwater is contaminated under both 915 Court Street
property and City property. The City authorized the installation of underground
Community Redevelopment Agency 2009-09-28
2
equipment and piping throughout our property to facilitate the remediation.
The remediation system is located on city property, as well as 75% of the
underlying monitor well and recovery system used for air sparging and pumping
groundwater through the remediation system.
At this time, however, there is no active remediation conducted by the State. This
site has not ranked high on the State’s list for continued funding. As such, there is
no anticipated date to receive a No Further Action (NFA) or a Site Rehabilitation
Completion Order (SRCO).
The Environmental Health and Preparedness Division of the Pinellas County
Health Department has been authorized by contract with the Florida Department
of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to administer the petroleum cases in Pinellas
County. The County has indicated that this site can be developed as long as the
developer coordinates with the County and follows protocol so that construction
does not cause further spreading or exacerbates the contamination, removes or
caps wells in accordance with regulations, etc. If at the time the site ranks high
enough to receive State funding, the state will work with the property owner to
continue the remediation/monitoring of the site.
Analysis
Given the strategic location of the site where Court and Chestnut Streets merge,
this site is an ideal location for redevelopment because of its “Gateway” to the
Downtown Core and Clearwater Beach. An office headquarters in this location
would add tax base and senior professional jobs to the downtown/CRA. Aurora’s
desire for a landmark building and upgrading the landscaping for the city’s
retention pond will help to improve the appearance of this important corridor.
The Engineering Department has reviewed the information from Pinellas County
concerning this site. The proposed plans for this site will not hinder any future
cleanup efforts, if initiated by the State. If required for development, any existing
wells can be properly closed following State guidelines. With respect to the
adjacent stormwater pond, civil site design engineering can easily address any
stormwater issues as part of the development.
Understanding and accommodating its impediments, the upland portion of the
city-owned property can be made available for redevelopment/disposition.
Next Steps
In order to proceed with the redevelopment of this parcel, the following steps will
need to take place:
Boundary survey of portion of property to be conveyed from City to CRA
City declares parcel surplus for the purpose of conveying title to CRA
Community Redevelopment Agency 2009-09-28
3
CRA accepts title
CRA releases RFP for purposes of redevelopment
Review of Proposals and Selection of Developer
Negotiation of Development Agreement
Site plan approval process through CDB and issuance of Development Order
At this time, staff is seeking general direction to proceed with this process and
specifically, authority from the CRA to release an RFP for the redevelopment of
the site at the appropriate time.
In response to questions, Economic Development and Housing Director Geri Campos
Lopez said property bidders must accept some of the environmental obligations. It will
take approximately 1 month for the RFP to go out.
It was stated that the city can charge the CRA for the land. The CRA can sell the land
and pay back the city.
Staff was directed to put strict guidelines on the property.
Trustee John Doran moved to authorize the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP)
for the development of the parcel bounded by Chestnut Street and Prospect Avenue
(15/29/15/16830/003/0070). The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
3.2 Approve the Interlocal Agreement with the Downtown Development Board (DDB)
to provide personnel, administrative and management responsibilities during
Fiscal Year 2009-2010 in the amount of $59,779 and refund the CRA tax
increment fee of $201,767 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute
same.
Florida Statutes 163.387 requires all taxing authorities, which includes the DDB,
to make an annual appropriation in an amount equal to the incremental increase
in the ad valorem revenue within the CRA area. The DDB’s increment payment is
$201,767 according to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser’s office. In a spirit
of cooperation to further the downtown redevelopment plan, the CRA Trustees
executed the first Interlocal Agreement in FY 1999-2000 to provide personnel,
administrative and management responsibilities to the DDB and to refund the
Community Redevelopment Agency 2009-09-28
4
difference between the increment payment and the management fee. This is the
tenth fiscal year that the CRA would enter into the agreement.
Pursuant to Florida Statute 163.01, the CRA and DDB can enter into this
agreement in which the DDB agrees to perform certain responsibilities and
functions including funding projects and programs consistent with and in
furtherance of the downtown redevelopment plan. The intent of this agreement is
for the DDB and the CRA to work collaboratively on projects and programs that
further downtown goals and objectives. For the second year in a row, downtown
retail and restaurant recruitment programs and downtown events are the focus for
the CRA and the DDB collaboration. The management of the DDB by CRA staff
enables the CRA and the DDB to utilize the public dollars more efficiently.
The agreement also outlines the DDB’s commitment to financially support the
construction debt service, operation and maintenance of the boat slips, docks,
boardwalk, promenade and related facilities proposed to be constructed on the
Downtown Waterfront. The DDB has made three contributions of $50,000 since
April 2007. Due to the economy, the City determined that it was not in the best
interest of the City and the taxpayers to borrow funds for construction of the boat
slips. Instead, the City is paying for the majority of the construction costs from City
reserves. Any of the annual DDB contribution not needed for operations of the
boat slips will be used to reimburse the City for the cost of construction. The intent
of the DDB is to contribute up to $50,000 a year for 10 years for a total not to
exceed $500,000.
The DDB shall pay the CRA $59,779 for the services agreed to in the Interlocal
Agreement.
The DDB approved the Interlocal Agreement at their meeting on September 9,
2009.
Trustee George N. Cretekos moved to approve the Interlocal Agreement with the
Downtown Development Board (DDB) to provide personnel, administrative and
management responsibilities during Fiscal Year 2009-2010 in the amount of $59,779
and refund the CRA tax increment fee of $201,767 and authorize the appropriate
officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
3.3 Introduction of La Cachette Restaurant and Chef/Owner Martin Jackson by
Assistant City Manager Rod Irwin.
Owner Martin Jackson thanked the city for the opportunity to bring restaurant to
Downtown. Mr. Jackson reviewed cuisine offered at La Cachette and anticipated
opening in November.
Community Redevelopment Agency 2009-09-28
5
4. Adiourn
The meeting was adjourned at 9:24 a.m.
J~ ~uzI
Chair
Community Redevelopment Agency
Attest
\\\\\111111/111111
",\ nMENr fIll
", ",Or AT -q ///
~~\~Y.'!......€f.t g~/'l,
,$9 ~..., ....( 1-. ~
::::~:v.-' o~':TE ".00,-:::.
.. . On" \::P..... ~
=>-~ ",t;:j~~ ~ \og%
=~O: ~~:~~=
-- . ......-1-
~Z?'"l S-G' i ::t ff
.. ?7;'r':." . J,.;J .' "',
~ ,. . "1,
~ Jt"tJ-.. fII' J,. S-
~-~ ". .... ~$'
1-~ 00 ............ <"\'" ~
:;"'1 {r F' O?<\'v ",,,,
I" ... \"
/1111"'''''1\\\ \\\
Community Redevelopment Agency 2009-9-28
6