The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2009-10037 - 411 Shore Dr E - 411 Commercial Marina FLD2009-10037 411 EAST SHORE DR 4ll COMMERCIAL MARINA PLANNER OF RECORD: S K ATLAS # 267A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED : 10/02/2009 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC CDB: CLWCoverSheet CDB Meeting Date: December 15, 2009 Case Numbers: FLD2009-10037 Agenda Item: D.3. Owner/Applicant: 411 East, LLC Representative: Terri Skapik, Woods Consulting Address: 411 East Shore Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval in the Tourist (T) District (1) to permit the construction of a 4,000 square-foot, 31-slip dock as a marina facility with an increase to the maximum length of the dock from 75 percent of the lot width (133.5 feet) to 178.65 percent of the lot width (318 feet) and reduction to the required side (south) setback from 17.8 feet to 10.6 feet as Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Sections 2-803.C, 3-601 and 3-603 and (2) to permit a parking lot with a lot area of 17,061 square feet (upland), a lot width of 175 feet, a building height of 11.5 feet (to midpoint of roof), a front (west) setback of 8.22 feet (to pavement) and 15 feet (to structure), a side (north) setback of five feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of five feet (to pavement) and 10 feet (to building) a rear setback of 565 feet (to pavement from the submerged property line) and 16 parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.C. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH) BEACH BY DESIGN CHARACTER DISTRICT: Marina District PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Marina (Vacant) Proposed Use: Marina and Parking Lot EXISTING North: Tourist (T) District SURROUNDING Retail Sales ZONING AND USES: South: Tourist (T) District Marina (Vacant) East: Preservation (P) District Intracoastal Waterway West: Tourist (T) District Restaurant and Overnight Accommodations Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 1 of 13 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.133 acre (0.39 acres upland and 0.74 acres submerged) subject property is located on the east side of East Shore Drive approximately 250 feet north of the intersection of Causeway Boulevard and East Shore Drive within the Beach by Design Marina District. This district is the northern gateway to Clearwater Beach and has a high profile location along Clearwater Harbor and visibility from Causeway Boulevard. The Marina District also supports the maintenance and expansion of dock facilities that serve existing and new uses, as well as those that serve the broader public. Formerly the 13-unit Bay Breeze Resort Motel occupied the subject property, it has since been demolished. Since demolition the upland portion has been used as temporary seasonal parking. The existing eight-slip, 497 square foot dock is proposed to be completely removed. To the east is the Intracoastal waterway and to the south a vacant lot and dock. Overnight accommodations and restaurant uses are to the west and retail sales and services exist to the north. The overall site appearance in this area is fair with several vacant lots and non-conforming structures. Development Proposal: The proposal is for both a marina and parking lot. The marina is proposed as a 31 slip, 4,000 square foot dock with a dockmaster building and 16 surface parking spaces; also proposed is an additional 16 surface parking spaces available to patrons of other local businesses. The proposed boat slips will be available to the public for daily, weekly or monthly rental on a first come first serve basis. The hours of operation are 7AM to 11 PM for both the marina and public parking. The proposed dockmaster building will be 256 square feet and contain a restroom, office and storage area and will serve patrons from both the marina and public parking. The dockmaster building will be constructed of hardi board siding, metal roofing and will have bahama style pull down metal shutters for the windows. All parking spaces will be numbered and marina tenants will have assigned parking spaces. The onsite attendant will assign public parking spaces and collect the fee and then provide a parking pass. The slips are proposed to accommodate 31 boats up to 40 feet in length. No covered boatlifts, roof structures or vertical walls are proposed as part of this marina. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code is discussed below. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Table 2-801.1, the maximum allowable FAR is 1.0. The proposal is in compliance with the above as it has a FAR of 0.02. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR Pursuant to CDC Table 2-801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The overall proposed ISR is 0.69, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 2 of 13 Minimum Lot Area /Lot Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, marinas and marina facilities are required a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 50 feet. Compliance is achieved with the criteria as the parcel contains 17,061 square feet and has a lot width of 175 feet. Pursuant to CDC Table 2-802, parking lots are required a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 100 feet. Compliance is achieved with the parcel in regard to the lot width; however it is not in compliance with the Iot area requirement thus the filing of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application. Maximum Building Hei hg_t: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-802, the maximum height for parking lot structures is 50 feet and pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the maximum height for marina facilities is 25 feet. The dockmaster building is proposed at a height of 11.5 feet which is consistent with both Code requirements. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-802, the minimum front setback for parking lots can range between 15 - 25 feet, the minimum rear setback can range between 10 - 20 feet and the minimum side setback is 10 feet. The proposal includes reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 8.22 feet (to proposed pavement) and 15 feet (to building); to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement); and to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and 10 feet (to building). As the applicant owns the submerged land to the rear of the parcel, the pavement is setback 565 feet from the submerged property line. The front (west) setback and both sides (north and south) are not within the flexibility range thus the filing of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application. Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum front setback for marinas and marina facilities can range between 10 - 15 feet, the minimum side setbacks can range between 0 - 10 feet and the rear setback can range between 10 - 20 feet. In regard to marinas and marina facilities only the proposed front (west) setback is not within the flexibility range. Minimum Off-Street Parkin: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, marinas and marina facilities are required one off-street parking space per two slips. As 31 slips are proposed, a total of 16 parking spaces are required for the marina. The proposal has provided 32 parking spaces for both the marina and public parking lot. A total of 16 spaces will be labeled for exclusive marina use with remaining spaces available for public parking. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines will be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. Landscaping_ Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the (T) Tourist District; however the applicant has proposed a 10-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the off-street parking as well as a five-foot buffer on both sides and the rear. The buffers will be planted with both dwarf magnolias and live oak trees. Along with the trees will be three species of shrubs and groundcover. As this proposal is located in the Beach by Design Marina Residential Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 3 of 13 District, staff has requested the addition of clusters of three sable palms throughout the site and as such is attached as a condition of approval. The proposed addition of landscape buffers will provide enhanced landscape design. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E, ten percent of the vehicular use area must be landscaped with interior islands a minimum of 150 square feet in size and foundation plantings must be provided along 100 percent of any building facade facing a street right-of--way. The proposal provides 12.6 percent of the vehicular use area as interior landscape within appropriately sized islands. Lastly, shrubs, groundcover and trees provide foundation plantings on the building facade facing East Shore Drive. Solid Waste: The proposal provides for a screened dumpster location which has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the marina and marina facilities and parking lot uses with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-801.1, 2-802 and 2-803: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Maximum FAR 1.0 0.02 X Maximum ISR 0.95 0.69 X Minimum Lot Area Marinas and Facilities 5,000 square feet 17,061 square feet X Parking Lots 20,000 square feet 17,061 square feet X' Minimum Lot Width Marinas and Facilities 50 feet 175 feet X Parking Lots 100 feet 175 feet X Minimum Setbacks Marinas and Facilities Front: 10 - 15 feet West: 8.22 feet (to pavement) X' 15 feet (to building) Side: 0 - 10 feet North: 5 feet (to pavement) X Side: 0 - 10 feet South: 5 feet (to pavement) X ]0 feet (building) Rear: 10 - 20 feet East: 565 feet (submerged X property line) Parking Lots Front: 15 - 25 feet West: 8.22 feet (to pavement) X~ 15 feet (to building) Side: 10 feet North: 5 feet (to pavement) X' Side: 10 feet South: 5 feet (to pavement) X' 10 feet (to building) Rear: 10 - 20 feet East: 565 feet (submerged X property line) Maximum Building Height Marinas and Facilities 25 feet 11.5 feet X Parking Lots 50 feet 1 l .5 feet X Minimum 1 spaces per 2 slips 32 parking spaces XZ Off-Street Parking (16 parking spaces) ~ See analysis in Staff Report 2 (16J parking spaces are devoted to the marina and 16 are devoted to the public parking lot. Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 4 of 13 COMPLIANCE WITII FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.C (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and aonrooriate distances between buildinQS. Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 5 of 13 Additional Applicable Beach by Design Guidelines: Section II.C requires that a minimum five foot setback shall be provided for all paved surfaces. Additionally, the same section requires parking areas to be screened from Clearwater Harbor. A five foot setback has been provided from all paved surfaces and the parking area has been screened with viburnum and yaupon holly. The proposal is in compliance with both criteria. Section VII.D.1 requires the area between the building and the right-of--way to be 12 feet in width to create apedestrian-friendly environment. The proposed dockmaster building will be 15 feet from the right-of--way. Section VII.F requires all surface parking areas to be landscaped so that the view of such parking facilities from public roads, sidewalks and other places are defined by landscape material instead of asphalt. As discussed above, a 10-foot wide landscape buffer has been provided to screen the surface parking area from the road and sidewalk. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (CDC SECTION 2-803.E): The Flexibility criteria for marinas and marina facilities set forth in CDC Section 2-803.E state that the proposed marina shall not be located in any of the areas of environmental significance as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed marina is not located in any of the areas of environmental significance with the exception of its proximity to Clearwater Harbor grass beds. However, those sea grass beds were mapped prior to the dock design phase and the proposed dock has been located in a manner so as to avoid any sea grasses. There are no residentially zoned properties adjacent to the proposed dock (adjacent properties are zoned Tourist District). No commercial activities will be permitted in the leased slips and live aboard vessels will be prohibited. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.E (Marinas and Marina Facilities): Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 6 of 13 Consistent Inconsistent The parcel proposed for development is not located in areas identified in the X Comprehensive Plan as areas of environmental significance including: a. The north end of Clearwater Beach; b. Clearwater Harbor grass beds; c. Cooper's Point; d. Clearwater Harbor spoil islands; e. Sand Key Park; f. The southern edge of Alligator Lake. 2. No commercial activities other than the mooring of boats on a rental basis shall be X permitted on any parcel of land which is contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas, unless the marina facilities are totally screened from view from the contiguous land which is designated as residential and the hours of operation of the commercial activities are limited to the time period between sunrise and sunset. 3. Setbacks: X a. The reduction in the front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in the front setback results in an improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in the side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in the side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design or appearance. 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in X Division 5 of Article 3. 5. All marina facilities shall comply with the commercial dock requirements set forth X' in Section 3-601.C.3 and the marina and marina facilities requirements set forth in Section 3-603. ~ See Analysis for discussion of consistency/inconsistency. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (CDC SECTION 3-601.C.3.a-;?): The first criteria in CDC Section 3-601.C.3 is not applicable as the proposal is for a marina and parking lot, which are the principal uses. The dock will meet the width requirements, tie pole requirements and the northern setback requirement. The entirety of the subject property is within the Marina District of Beach by Design which supports the redevelopment of this district into a pedestrian and boater friendly destination that includes a mix of hotels, commercial, restaurant, residential and mixed use development, as well as a variety of dock facilities and water related uses. While the request for the length deviation significantly exceeds the allowable 75 percent lot width calculation, it is less than 25 percent of the width of the waterway and does not constitute a hazard to navigation. Additionally, the request for a setback reduction on the south from 17.8 feet to 10.6 feet is only for the boardwalk, the actual dock is setback 18.4 feet. The established character in the general vicinity is consistent with this request. Regarding impacts on water recreation activities, the City Harbormaster has reviewed the dock proposal and indicates that there is compliance with those criteria as well as the remaining environmental criteria. The following table depicts the consistency with the Flexibility criteria set for in CDC Section 3- 601.C.3.a-g. Specific responses to each of these criteria have been provided by the applicant and are included with their application. Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 7 of 13 Consistent I Inconsistent a. Use and Compatibility: X i) The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort, convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the property; ii) The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general; and iii) The proposed dock shall be compatible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. b. Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities: The use of the proposed dock shall X not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses including but not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats. c. Impacts on Navigation: The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a X detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public conveniences. d. Impacts on Marine Environment: X i) Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to marine grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas; and ii) Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. e. Impacts on Water Quality: X i) All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any other area associated with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the water body at mean or ordinary low water (-0.95 NGVD datum); and ii) The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. f. Impacts on Natural Resources: X i) The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest; and ii) The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range, nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated preservation areas such as those identified in the comprehensive land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird sanctuaries. g. Impacts on Wetlands Habitat/Uplands: The dock shall not have a material adverse X affect upon the unlands surroundine. Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 8 of 13 COMPLIANCE WITH DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS: The dimensional standards criteria for setbacks set forth in CDC Section 3-601.C.3.h state that docks shall be located no closer to any property line as extended into the water than the distance equivalent to ten percent of the width of the waterfront property line. The width of the waterfront property line on the subject property is 178 feet; therefore the proposed dock must be set back from both the north and south property line a minimum of 17.8 feet. As proposed, the dock will be set back from the north property line a distance of 48.8 feet and the boardwalk set back 10.6 feet. The dock will be set back 18.4 feet from the south property line. Staff supports the reduction to 10.6 feet as it is only for a boardwalk providing handicap accessibility. With regards to length, commercial docks shall not extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the subject property more than 75 percent of the width of the subject property as measured along the waterfront property line; thus the length of the dock is limited to 133.5 feet. As proposed, the dock has a length of 318 feet. The deviation request is to allow the proposed dock to be 184.5 feet longer than permitted by Code. Sea grass beds are located immediately east of the seawall, extending out as much as 40 feet, as such the slips may not be constructed within the first 40 feet. CDC Section 3-601.C.3.h.ii allows tie poles to extend beyond the dock provided such poles do not extend 25 percent of the width of the waterway and do not constitute a navigational hazard. The waterway width in this area is approximately 1,300 feet; therefore tie poles may extend up to 325 feet, approximately seven feet beyond the dock. The proposal has no tie poles extending beyond the dock. The Belle Harbor dock, to the north, has an approximate length of 332 feet and Frenchy's dock, also to the north, has an approximate length of 267 feet. To the south is the Barefoot Bay dock, approximately 248 feet in length and just across the bay, Island Way Yacht Club's dock is 400 feet in length. With this established character of existing docks in the vicinity, staff supports the request for an increased dock length. The same threshold that applies to length also applies to width; therefore the width of the proposed dock cannot exceed 133.5 feet. The dock has a proposed width of 107 feet; thus compliance with this standard is achieved. The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the standards and criteria as per CDC Section 3-601.C.3.h: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Dock Setbacks 10% of the width of the subject North: 48.8 feet X (Minimum) property (17.8 feet) 10% of the width of the subject South: 10.6 feet (to boardwalk) X' property (17.8 feet) Dock Length 75% of the width of the subject 318 feet X' (Maximum) property (133.5 feet) Dock Width 75% of the width of the subject 107 feet X Maximum ro erty (133.5 feet ' See discussion above Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 9 of 13 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (CDC SECTION 3-603): Compliance has been met with the Flexibility criteria for marinas and marina facilities as set forth in CDC Section 3-603. While proposed for a marina facility, there will be no living aboard, no fueling facilities, no launching facilities, and no chartering and/or servicing of vessels. Since a portable sanitary pump out station is proposed, no holding tank will be located over water. Restrooms have been provided landside for marina and parking lot patrons. Additionally, the proposed dock will be constructed on pilings and spaced appropriately to aid in tidal flushing and aquatic flushing. No construction will take place that will inhibit tidal flushing. Manatee awareness signs will be posted on the docking facility. The City Harbormaster has determined that the proposed marina poses no hazard or obstruction to navigation. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria in CDC Section 3-603. Specific responses to each of these criteria have been provided by the applicant and are included with their application. Consistent Inconsistent 1. All proposed activities including, but not limited to, fueling, pumping-out, X chartering, living-aboard, launching, dry storage and the servicing of boats, motors and related marine equipment shall require approval in accordance with the provisions of the zoning district in which the marina or marina facility is proposed to be located. 2. For marina facilities located adjacent to residential districts, no fueling or launching X facilities shall be located within 20 feet of the residential property line, and no fueling or servicing of boats shall occur at such marinas after 9:00 p.m. or before 6:00 a.m. 3. No fuel storage facility or sanitary pump-out station holding tank shall be located I X over water. 4. The marina shall pose no hazard or obstruction to navigation, as determined by the X city harbormaster. 5. The marina shall not adversely affect the environment, including both onshore and X offshore natural resources. 6. Adequate sanitary facilities shall be provided landside and a sanitary pump-out X station shall be provided and shall be available to marina users 24 hours a day. 7. A manatee protection plan shall be provided and appropriate speed zone signs shall be X posted to control boat speed for manatee protection. 8. Adequate spill containment areas shall be provided on the property. X 9. Design of the marina shall maintain existing tidal flushing and aquatic circulation X patterns. 10. In the event of conflict between these standards and federal or state law or rules, the X federal or state law or rules shall apply to the extent that these standards have been areempted; otherwise, the more strineent reQUlations shall ao~ly. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA 2-802.L: Compliance has been met with the applicable Flexibility criteria for parking lots as set forth in CDC Section 2-802.L. The subject property is not contiguous to residential property, the frontage along East Shore Drive is landscaped, the building complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 and there is an unmet existing demand for additional parking in the immediate vicinity. Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 10 of 13 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS: As previously discussed the development of the land relating to scale, bulk, coverage, density and character with adjacent properties and the immediate vicinity have been found to be consistent. The marina project represents an appropriate addition to the waterfront and complements Beach by Design. The scale and coverage of the proposed marina is appropriate for this location, as it has been designed to be consistent with the lengths of other existing docks. The marina will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development or redevelopment of adjacent properties. Moreover, the proposed marina is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. The proposed docks will not affect the health or safety of persons working or residing in the neighborhood as they meet state and local guidelines by not extending past the 25 percent waterway width and will be illuminated well with no tie poles beyond the length of the dock. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913.A of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity, 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of November 5, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the December 15, 2009 Community Development Board (CDB) meeting based upon the following: Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 1.133 acre (0.39 acres upland and 0.74 acres submerged) subject property is located on the east side of East Shore Drive approximately 250 feet north of the intersection of Causeway Boulevard and East Shore Drive; 2. That the parcels are located in the Marina District of Beach by Design; Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 11 of 13 3. That the upland development consists of a 256 square foot dockmaster building and 32 parking spaces; 4. That the existing dock and slips are to be removed; 5. That the site has approximately 178 feet of waterfront frontage on Clearwater Harbor between the north and south property lines; 6. That the proposal consists of the construction of a 4,000 square-foot, 31 slip dock to be used as a marina; 7. That the proposal consists of the construction of public parking lot of 16 spaces; 8. That based on a parking ratio of one parking space per two slips and there being 31 proposed slips, a total of 16 parking spaces are required; 9. That there are no residentially zoned properties adjacent to the proposed dock; 10. That the proposal includes a deviation to increase the maximum length from 75 percent of the lot width (133.5 feet) to 178.65 percent of the lot width (318 feet); 11. That the proposal includes a deviation to reduce the side (south) setback from 17.8 feet to 10.6 feet (to boardwalk); 12. That the proposed dock complies with the north setback and width standards of CDC Section 3-601.C.3.h; 13. That the development proposal is compatible with dock patterns of the surrounding area; and 14. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.E and 2-802.L; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the commercial dock review criteria as per CDC Section 3-601.C.3; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the marina review criteria as per CDC Section 3-603; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria as per CDC Section 3-913.A. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application in the Tourist (T) District (1) to permit the construction of a 4,000 square-foot, 31-slip dock as a marina facility with an increase to the maximum length of the dock from 75 percent of the lot width (133.5 feet) to 178.65 percent of the lot width (318 feet) and reduction to the required side (south) setback from 17.8 feet to 10.6 feet, as Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Sections 2-803.C, 3-601 and 3-603; and (2) to permit a parking lot with a lot area of 17,061 square feet (upland), a lot width of 175 feet, a building height of 11.5 feet (to midpoint of roof), a front (west) setback of 8.22 feet (to pavement) and 15 feet (to structure), a side (north) setback of five feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of five feet (to pavement) and 10 feet (to building) a rear setback of 565 feet (to pavement from the submerged property line) and 16 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.C. with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, 16 parking spaces are dedicated for marina use only and labeled as such; Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 12 of 13 2. That prior to the issuance of any permits a revised landscape plan be submitted to Staff showing clusters of three sabal palms throughout the site; 3. That the restroom facilities are identified as such on the facility; 4. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant underground the overhead utility line(s) from the west side of East Shore Drive to the east side and remove utility poles at the southwest corner of the property; 5. That no tenants conduct any commercial business from any slip in this marina; 6. That there be no fueling facilities at this marina; 7. That live aboard vessels are prohibited; 8. That covered boat lifts are prohibited; 9. That signage be permanently installed on the docks or at the entrance to the docks containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; and 10. That a copy of the SWFWMD and/or FDEP Permit and any other applicable environmental permits, Corps of Engineer's Permit and proof of permission to use State submerged land, if applicable, be submitted to the Planning Department prior to commencement of construction. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: ~~ ~~~~ A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: O Location Map ^ Aerial Map ^ Zoning Map ^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ^ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending Casesl Up For The Next CDBIEast Shore 411- Marina And Parking - ('1) - 2009.Xx -12- 15-09 CDB- SKi411 Marina And Parking -Staff Report. Docx Community Development Board -December 15, 2009 FLD2009-10037 -Page 13 of 13 Resume A. Scott Kurleman 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4553 scott.kurleman (a,myclearwater. com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III • Planner II August 2008 to present June 2005 to August 2008 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. • Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005 Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private properties. • Account Manager Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993 - 1996 Groveland, FL Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan. Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees. • Licensed Marketing Representative Allstate Insurance Company 1991 - 1993 Clearwater, FL Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance. • Store Manager William Natorp company, Inc. 1983 - 1991 Cincinnati, OH Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products. EDUCATION GRADUATE -Certificate: Community Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BS in Sustainability Management, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Graduated 1998. Major: Management. AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER, Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in Arboriculture. ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414. 64 1148 483 w 12 22J 4~1M 125 1o a ~. e . 45 I rn' X51 _ - - so 45 `~° 4g,9 Z1 ~ t3 ~ 1345 - - - CLEARW, ~ y J 2~ 454 q g -° a ` 81 - - - - .¢5 19 11 2 2 .4 ,~ 18j - 14- 14 ~ - - - 4 ¢¢1~7~ 1s 1s Q 1z HARBOR 4 c~ ,s B5 '4 S ~ p $ - - 1- vat C:JP u°'i 1 y 441 1 2 _ _ s 41 432 2436 y 425 2 W 431 4 - - - Q 430 ~ ~2~.5 - 140 439 3 ~ 423 3 - - - - - Q -425 ? I 39 4428 4 Q 4~3 8 - - - a21_s _I 4Y9 et a es erv~ce 3854 26 ~ Z 10 _ 4 - - - - - 11 , Q X17 37 ~~ B J/ s 415 12 Q `/ g - - - - 13 4111a A 3s taur~l~2 ~ ~ $ 40915 423 e C s - - - - - 40718 Vj 423 rL1 ~ I 406 Z c~1 1 9 - - - - - 90 , - q~18 ~ ~ _ ~ X08 gp1?9 - 33 0 e~no .~ 409 10 RT. 60 R.O.W~ t Q 20 - - - - - - -- - - - .~ _ A comm$ ~ ions Q 22 32 11 405 - 11 - - - - - - - - -3~ 23 12 Q 3~a24 s1 - - - t2- vermg- - - ~ ~ 30 400 13 ao3 Acc~nmo ations _ _ zs _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - 18400 401 X85_27 29 14 a 60 ~` (15) 390 I VWTER I T2 I ~ MEMORIAL CSWY O 5 "~ ~ e ~ 9 51 MEMORIAL CSWY I I ~ 3D h 60 28 1 EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: 411 East, LLC Case: FLD2009-10037 Endeavor Capital Partners I, LLC Site: 41 1 East Shore Drive Property Size: 1.133 Acres (0.39 Acres Upland/0.74 Acres Submer ed PIN: 08-29-15-02592-003-0070 Atlas Page: 267A 8 443 441 0 44 /~ o N °' "~ 439 443 6 2 y o a ~ * ~ 441 C z 431 432 438 425 430 ; 429 439 423 Q 427Meter ~, 425 428 Q 423 l~ ~1 421 Q 419 , Q 429 426 4>9 P Z 417 Q 415 T ~ 413 hhh W 411 422 409 ' ` 4238 q07 4 423A 405 406 W 41> 403 408 Q 401 400 399 409 Q Q Q 395 408 ~ 405 Z 393 0 391387 400 y 403 h 385 400 Q 401 W 201 390 CA SWAY B 61 O /R 0 Q 61 0 N P ZONING MAP Owner: 41 1 East, LLC Case: FLD2009-10037 Endeavor Capital Partners I , LLC Site: 411 East Shore Drive Property Size: l .l 33 Acres (0.39 Acres Upland/0.74 Acres Submer ed PIN: 08-29-15-02592-003-0070 Atlas Page: 267A o $~~ ~ 4 AVALON w < ~ o o KEfdDALL 3uen~ Z ~`i `P 2 Z c ( cn ~ z z U ^~ ~ c BAY ESPLANADE ~ ~vN Pt+ R.n..CK=+tv~.Y ~ kfi ~~.~ ~ ~" ~v~~ 1 -~ °~ 6AYFv1OPdT ST Skifi~ potN~ ~ u PROJE CT ~ ~ S~~ ~.~~~ ~ ~ SITE ~ z ~O~~ N pDrt1T rs PAPAYA ST ~: fn DORY PAS~GE z° z ~ ~¢ O i'ier gp ~ ~ ~~ G~tas~vYaY Bkd ~ -s1~ LVINDYdAR a FIRST v S7 x sECOru~ ©~y~~ ~ DR ?~IIRCi ST LOCATION MAP Owner: 411 East, LLC Case: FLD2009-10037 Endeavor Capital Partners I, LLC Site: 411 East Shore Drive Property Size: 1.133 Acres (0.39 Acres Upland/0.74 Acres Submer ed PIN: 08-29-15-02592-003-0070 Atlas Page: 267A r p3 ~t ~ V • y ,. ~ Q a ,r e 1', ~ 'fib ~` ~. c"° •rc:__e~m_e,~C' h:+'~'~ ~ taw, ~ ,., h~ ~ ., , i ,,,~. •~ ~ - z z ~ . ~_ y+ ` ~ 'r ~ ' ~, . ! rr!!9 ~Alfkli r ~~ '; i~~ ct'c'"~k1Y~`'`3 S ~t3~ ~ ~~1A ~ r ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ 1 ~ ~ _.. ~r 1 a ~ ~ .~, ~~ ~,l ~~ ~ a r sN;'' ~ .: ~ J D` ~ _J ~• • ~ ~+ " ~~ ~ ~ . ~ ~, ~t , ~~ , ' ~ ii ~. 1~L1 r I._'~~ ~~ ~} ~F A 11 _+~r re ~,~, y!: r: ~, ~ °_ • ' w (. f re4 ~ `.~~I ~ j ~ ~~ ~ - ky~ ~7 ~, ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,,- ~ r ~ K~ "` ~ i ~ gg } ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i''~' yj ~ 'FY 1 _ \`~~ ' ,. r~n.~ t ~~~R"~'~ ~'OA3'C,. Y ~ k ^t~~ :, .. , q~ fit. P'~-elk ~. ,M ~' ~ --- f "q , ' "! ~ ~~- '* x~" ~ ~ ''~~ ``E++_~*. *Pa `t~` ~I.P,t~r t~eAlti; ~ ~, ,.. Rit ' ~~ ea ~6t~~ s F ~ F~ ~! :bc~ ~ ~. ~ ) asu~ ! ^ ~ . ~ . ; t 1 ~, ,.~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ +~ 4 ~ _ _ is . ~ ~ I ~k~~ 3 ~ ~ ~, r < o ~ ryn: ,~ g F E,.1' ~ ~IeP a rr~P ?~ ~ qa m ~ ~ r,.e4lR~~ < ~ ~ ~~ I ~' ~.~ .Ae,e~. iA ~.P E.aF~: ~ r~. ~~~ ~ .x .~ , : r:. ~ 1 ;~' ~ ~ 7:. ~ ~. AERIAL MAP Owner: 411 East, LLC Case: FLD2009-10037 Endeavor Capital Partners I, LLC Site: 411 East Shore Drive Property Size: 1.133 Acres (0.39 Acres Upland/0.74 Acres Submer ed PIN: 08-29-15-02592-003-0070 Atlas Page: 267A ....:~., 1 `L ~: '~~ _ ~._. ~_ _. View of property looking East from East Shore Drive '_ .:,~ „~ -.. ~~~ ~ ~ .~„ ~" ,,a; View looking South from subject property e.. ~ ~.. -,_' _ - -~ - .. _ ,,t .~ ,;~. r a~•a+~~...... -~ ~, ~~"~`" - ~ 'r!X View from property looking North (Erenchy's Seafood) .,~s~~- _ ~ _~, ' '4. Y w I~0tR7i.~.,,~ ,ve. .1 a' s ~ ~. ,,..+ ~ `6 ~` ~C .a G. tt~~ ~ ~~ View looking West from subject property (Restaurant and Overnight Accommodations) ~• ~y~, . ~ ~ . 411 East Shore Drive FLD2009-10037 Page lof 1 View of existing dock on subject property .~ Planning Department ` ~ ~~~~~ 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE 411 East Shore Marina ~ NOTE: iSTOTAt SETSOF INFORMATIIIIY REQCJIRED (APPCICATtONSPtttS SITE PIr4t~tSETSJ FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) .APPLICANT NAME: 411 East, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 107 Moore St., Princeton, NJ 08540 PHONE NUMBER: 609-497-9640 FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER EMAIL: peter allington_markS@yahOO.Cam PROPERTY OWNER(S): 411 East, LLC List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: Woods Consulting, Terri Skapik MAILING ADDRESS: 1714 CR 1, Suite 22, Dunedin, Florida 34698 PHONE NUMBER: 727-786-5747 FAX NUMBER: 727-786-7479 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: ten-ISka Ik woodsconsultin .or B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: PROJECT VALUATION: $ 240,000.00 411 East Shore Drive 08-29-15-02592-0.03-0070 5~ b rn erg ~~~ I~f33 (0,3~ vpl~tnd~O,~yQc PAQCELSIZE(squarefeet): ~1~~53Ct~~Ob) vQ~hrcl BARBOUR-MORROW SUB BLK C, LOTS 7, 8 & 9 & S 1/2 OF LOT 6 & SUBM LAND/ TIF DEED #17,4 1 PROPOSED USE(S): 31-slip wet slip marina and upland marina facilities and public parking lot (16 parking spaces) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Level 2 Flexible Development Review for 31-slip, 4,000 sq ft wet slip marina; marina Specifically identify the request office with restroom, upland site plan for 16 marina parking spaces; parking plan for 16 (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all public parking spaces. Requested code deviations are specified in Exhibit A. requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of -------------------- ---- ----- - - parking spaces, specific use, etc.) ,~9z >~h t~N C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS TDR , A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO~if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ~/ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) warranty deed and affidavit attached. D. ~/ 1. I WRITTEN SUBMITTAL KE(.1UIEitIVItN r S: (%ode Section s-yi s.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attached Exhibit A I 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attached Exhibit A 3. The proposed development +.vi•.I not ad+%ersely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attached Exhibit A 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attached Exhibit A 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attached Exhibit A 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attached Exhibit A C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) `Y Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The owner needs to accommodate as many parking spaces on the site to make the site financially viable. The code requirements such as set backs restrict the number of parking spaces that can reasonably be placed on the site and therefore restrict the financial viability of the site. ?. The dev?Innment or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district The intent of the zoning district is to encourage tourism. The proposed facility will help achieve this by providina much needed parking spaces to neighboring establishments and auser-friendly parking environment, ali of which wiii encourage Tourism in the area. 13. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. I There will be no structures over 2 stories in height that wlll hlnaer or obstruct views from neighboring developments. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The proposed development will not hinder or cause detriment to the adjacent properties but will rather aid their business by providing parking for their establishments. There is a current shortage of parking in the area and this facility will provide much needed relief. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working watertront use. b) The proposed parking facility would increase access to the adjoining businesses. c) The proposed parking facility will be an economic contributor the neighboring business as it provides easy access to those businesses, thereby increasing its customer base. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. a) The proposed parking facility will not cause any visible obstruction or noise related uses that will impede orderly development. b) The proposed parking facility will meet City design guidelines by adhering to City design specifications. e) The proposed development will provide adequate landscape buffers where none currently exist. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) p' A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt Lg At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; lry Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; tiI?' All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; C3' Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Gl' A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ~ Prnnncar_i atnrrr~water rietentinn/rPtentjnn area inch viinn tM of hank, the of alone and nl ~tlPt Control structure; Q' Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ~' COP'. OF PERN~iT INQUIRY LETTcR CR 3CUT711NECT ~ LO^(CA ',NATLR NIANAGL;~1EtiT CICT~:ICT (CV~'FWUC) FE^:JIIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable B' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): ~ stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) l+Y SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 74 copies; C3' TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; f~ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; l~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; p' GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); GY COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page4of8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ~' SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): / Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; / North arrow; / Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; / All dimensions; / Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; / Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; / Ail required setbacks; / All existing and proposed points of access; / All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; / Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; . ~ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, qas ~' and water lines; / All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; ~/ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; ~ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; / Location of all landscape material; / Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; / Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; / Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and / Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requ`ring a Level Two approval. ®' SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; / Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the T~~~ number of required spaces; _~~T~~-~A~_~R~~~6S Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, - expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; / Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; / Building and structure heights; / Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and / Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. frY REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/ X 11); ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) Q' LANDSCAPE PLAN v~ith the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ~/ All existing and proposed structures; / Names of abutting streets; / Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; / Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; / Sight visibility triangles; / Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; / Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); / Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; F4ant schedule with a key (symbol or tatrel) irrdtcating the size, description, spectflcaticrts, quantifies, and spacing requirements of all ~ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; / Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; / Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); / Irrigation notes. q/ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/=X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Q' BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: / All sides of all buildings ~/ Dimensioned / Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) / Materials REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/ X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they v~ill be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8 '/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A,13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or hislher designee or if the proposed development:. WiH degrade the acceptable level of service far any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Ptan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or tnlersection with five {5) reportable accidents within fhe prior itivelve {12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared In accordance vrith a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and fhe Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee {727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. t~ Acknowledgement of traffle impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and poshdevelopment levels of service for all __ roadway legs and each turning movement al all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. ~~ CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS iN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIF{CANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.. if you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Ftow Calculations, Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or tre pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of Its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to Include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. rs4 Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Fiow Calculations/YVater Study Is Included. Fire Flow CaiculatiensNVater Study Is not required. t` y.~ t CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FORA FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS! WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. if you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-433d. M. SIGNATURE: i, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in This application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this applicallon, Signature of property owner or representative `~..lu W.-cl.. , Prls...ru- r.;'ci' i-•r.r~ 41.t1,:., . LLr t~cw .1ERS c.y ivt~c~ ~ STATE OF Ff=9RtBA, COUNTY OF Ptt~fEttYkS Sw rn to and subscri ed before me this _~ day of ~„~cn~ Zov~~ , A.D. 20~° _ to me and/or by N~ A a ~~ ,who is personally known has produced 111 " t ~_ , as idehtification. Notary public, ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ My commission expires: I~ ~ z;. , CaDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 07081Comprehens~ive Inhit Project (FLT) 2008~0~~ ~doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFfIDAViT Td AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property otwners on deed - PRINT fu0 names: 2. That (I amlwe are) the owner{s) and record title holder(s) of the follo~ng described property {address or general location): ~~ 1 1 ~.-G ~~'- ~ h O ~ ~ .b ~, ~' l C'Gi. y"y.) c~ `-r' r' r I o r- 7 e'_~ ~, _.._. _ _ _t ~ 3. - ---- ----- That this Properly constitutes the property for which a request fora; (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (hag(have) appointed and (does(do) appoint: i e r~ v~~ ~ )~.ct (~ o ~-, ~`~ ~~ y t~~'l S [ ~,_~ ~ V 1 ~-, roc i l 1 ~I c. tz t , `_~~r ,~ ~1. ~-- _ _ ___ __ _ ~iJn~~ty~ ~ ~~f~~ ___ ._ __. as (hisitheir) agent{s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visiEs to the property are necessary by City representatives in order io process this application and the owner authorizes Ciky representatives iq visit and photograph the properly described in this apptication; 7. That e), the undersigned authority, hereby certify chat the foregoing Is true and correct. ,~ . Property Owner --_-- ~~~ -~LLProperty Owner te~+•r t-'~.vr~ei~ -~a..s~.:! L~~ i~c•~ar~r N~~.t 1~, LLC ~ Property Owner Property Owner ~ ~~ 1~~~~7 J 12 S G`~ STATE OF FEF-3R-~C1A, COUNTY QF PtNEtt-AS Before me if~e undersigned, an offrcer duty commissioned by the law S of't he S ta t e of Florida, on this / L-- day of /A ~ ~ / ~ - ..~~~ _ ~~_ personally appeared ~~~s--,~._ .!-~_~~~~ __ who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says chat he/she fully understands the contents of the afidavit That he/she signed. ....____ __-. L~'~ _..._._ _._..--- Notary PublEc Signature Notary SeallStamp My Commission Expires: ~~~~ { `~4 *'~~` CaDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusanlDesktoptplanning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FlD) 2008 07.11.doc Page 8 of 8 Woods Consulting Environmental Permitting Marine Engineering Hydrogeology Land Planning Scott Kurleman City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 November 13, 2009 1714 County Road 1, Suite 22 Dunedin, FL 34698 Re: FLD2009-10037 - 411 East Shore Drive Dear Scott, in response to the DRC comments dated 11-05-G9, please note the following: General Engineering: Items 1-5 are listed as prior to issuance of building permit which we acknowledge. Environmental and Fire: There are no issues. Harbor Master, There are no issues. Also, please note, there are no commercial uses of the wet slips being proposed (such as Para-sail rentals, PWC rentals or speed boats). Legal and Land Resources: There are no issues. Landscaping: See zoning responses. Parks and Recreation: There are no issues. Stormwater: 1). Please see revised Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan. Please note we acknowledge the five items as listed prior to issuance of Building Permit and the one item as a general note regarding permit. Office: (727) 786-5747 Fax: (727) 786-7479 Email: info~woodsconsulting.org www.woodsconsulting.org Please note we acknowledge the two items as listed as general notes regarding the permit. Solid Waste: We acknowledge that we need to work with Tom Glenn of the Solid Waste Department to ensure that the dumpster location, details and accessibility is adequate. Traffic Engineering: Please note we acknowledge the three items as listed prior to issuance of Building Permit and the one item as a general note regarding the permit. Planning: 1) Please note sidewalks are proposed on the west and south sides of the marina office and encroachments have been eliminated. 2) Please note modifications to the site plan as requested have eliminated the potential of an automobile pinning someone inside the restroom. 3) South setbacks are dimensioned. 4) Please find enclosed the completed Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Development Application and written submittal criteria as per 2.802.E as requested. 5) Wheel stops are shown in all parking spaces. 6) Additional landscaping has been provided as requested, see Sheet C-05 of the Engineering Plan prepared by Howard Civil Engineering. 7) Enhanced landscaping has been provided as requested, see Sheet C-05 of the Engineering Plan prepared by Howard Civil Engineering. 8) The dumpster is no longer located along the waterfront. The owner is in the process of getting a shared dumpster agreement with the adjacent property owner(s). This will eliminate the need for any onsite dumpster. The plan does show an area for a roll out dumpster. The developer acknowleds that final approval will be contingent on an acceptable shared dumpster agreement. 9) The parking plan was modified to not have 11 parking spaces in a row. 10) Please see Sheet C-03 of the Engineering Plan prepared by Howard Civil Engineering that provides the total interior landscape areas (sf). 11) The purpose of the panel board is to post announcements and other important information to the marina tenants. Such information may include, hours of operation, upcoming events, pump out schedule, tide information, emergency contacts, etc. 12) Yes, the marina will be staffed 7 days a week between the hours of 7AM and 11 PM. 13) The parking spaces will be numbered and marina tenants will have assigned parking spaces for their use. Available public parking spaces will be assigned by the site attendant. 14) Acknowledged. 15) Acknowledged. 16) A dimension from the end of the dock to the submerged property line is provided on Woods Consulting Marine Engineering Sheet 24. 17) Paved access is provided to the dock. 18) Solid waste can site are shown. 19) A site attendant will be onsite and operate out of the marina office. When public parking spaces are available, they will be rented and a fee collected. The spaces can be rented hourly or daily. A parking pass will be provided and placed inside the vehicle on the dashboard. 20) As per Beach by Design, minimum setback of 5 ft is provided for all paved surfaces. 21) As per Beach by Design, the parking areas are screened from Clearwater Harbor and landscaping has been augmented on the east side. Thank you for your assistance and please feel free to call me if you have any questions. My regards, 0~ Terri Skapik Senior Hydrogeologist Woods Consulting P:1411 East Shore (401-07)1411 East Shore -response to DRC comments 11-13-09.wpd Exhibit A 411 East Shore Docks Revised 11-13-09 Parcel Information: Address: 411 East Shore Drive Parcel I D: 08-29-15-02592-003-0070 Existing Zoning: Tourist, "T" Future Land Use: RFH Character District or Overlay: Beach by Design Request: Construct 4,000 sq ft commercial dock with 31 wet slips, upland site plan approval for paved parking for 16 dedicated marina spaces and 16 dedicated public parking spaces, a dockmaster's office with restroom, landscaping and storm water retention. Code Deviations being requested: Increase in dock length from 133.5 ft to 318 ft; 2. Reduction in dock south side setback for boardwalk located along seawall from 17.8 ft to 10.6 ft; 3. Reduction to the front landscape buffer from 10 ft to 8.22 ft for only the very small area of the NW corner of the lot as the buffer is maintained in all other areas with the current site plan; and 4. Reduction in rear parking lot setback from 10 ft to 5 ft. Written Submittal Requirements Section D of Flexible Development Application The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed use of the site as a wet slip marina with slips available to tourists and residents is consistent with Clearwater's Beach by Design (see attached Beach by Design pages 14 through 18). The existing parcels along East Shore Drive are a mix of motels, hotels, restaurants, seafood processing company and residential properties. The use of the existing docks in the immediate area are tied to their respective upland uses such that the motel docks can only be used by motel guests, the residential docks can only be used by the resident unit owners and the restaurant docks can only be used by the commercial fishing boats and the restaurant patrons. This project will be the first along East Shore to provide public docks to both tourists and residents. The proposed dock meets the dimensional criteria of the City's community development code as it pertains to docks with the exception of the overall length and a side setback to accommodate a small boardwalk along the seawall. The proposed dock is 318 ft in length which is more than allowed by the dimensional standards of commercial docks. The applicant owns 178 linear ft of shoreline which allows a maximum dock length of 133.5 ft. The variance for length is being requested for several reasons. First, there is a significant portion of the near shore area that has sea grass beds that must be avoided. Therefore, the actual boat slips do not begin for 25 to 40 off the wall thus reducing the number of boat slips that could be permitted if there were no sea grass beds present. The sea grass beds are protected by state and federal rules and mooring of boats and construction over submerged resources is not permitted as these activities can negatively impact the resources. Second, and arguably equally as important, the variance for length will allow the maximum number of wet slips to meet the "Marina District' vision of Beach by Design in providing the maximum use of the waterfront for boaters visiting or residing in Clearwater. For this property, the applicant owns the submerged land extending all the way out to the western edge of Mandalay Channel. The additional wet slips on this privately owned submerged land will allow the applicant to provide more public access to the Clearwater Beach area. Please see Plan Drawing Sheet 17 that shows the proposed commercial dock in relation to the existing adjacent docks and docks in the immediate area. The upland property to the north at 419 East Shore is a seafood company with a large commercial dock that extends into Clearwater Harbor approximately 267 ft. The dock provides transient mooring to restaurant patrons and permanent mooring for commercial fishing vessels. The upland property to the south is currently vacant but has a dock that is approximately 60 ft in length. It is possible that the site, when developed in the future, may expand their docks. Other docks built within Clearwater Harbor include the Belle Harbor residential docks that extend into Clearwater Harbor 332 ft, the Barefoot Bay commercial docks that extend 248 ft and the Island Way Yacht Club's commercial docks that extend 400 ft into the Harbor. Therefore the use of the site as a commercial marina with wet slips will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the area as envisioned by Beach by Design and in size is similar to the adjacent docks and other large docks located in Clearwater Harbor. 2. The proposed development will not hinder ordiscourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and building or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed commercial dock and 31 wet slips will significantly improve the value of the surrounding properties. The proposed commercial dock and 31 wet slips will not hinder or discourage development at adjacent properties as the proposed dock more than meets the required side setback on the north side and provides a reduced side setback only for the boardwalk attaching the dock to the sidewalk. Variances are being requested for the overall length of the dock and the south side setback for the portion of the dock that runs 2 marginally along the seawall to connect to the upland sidewalk. As noted above, the proposed length is consistent with several large docks in Clearwater Harbor. The proposed dock does not impede ingress/egress to the neighboring docks and does not impede navigation in Mandalay Channel. Much care and consideration was given to the neighbors to make sure the proposed dock would not impede the adjacent existing structures or adjacent proposed structures (for example, the south property owner may wish to expand the length of their docks in the future). 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed commercial dock and 31 wet slips will be for the use by the public. The docks will be professionally operated and a Dockmaster will be onsite during normal work hours and all slip occupants will be required to abide by the marina's rules and regulations. Such regulations often address appropriate behavior, enforcing proper use of boating equipment, enforcing proper use boating and navigation waterways, boater education, and environmental education. 4. The proposed development is designed to avoid traffic congestion. The proposed commercial dock and 31 wet slips will be for the use by the public and therefore require one parking space for every two wet slips. The upland site plan provides for paved parking for 32 spaces including 2 handicapped parking spaces; or nearly double the parking that is required for the wet slips. Please note that on any given weekday, only about 10% of boaters will use their boats and this equates to approximately 3 boats being used. On a given weekend or holiday, approximately 25% of boaters will use their boats and this equates to 8 boats being used. Traffic associated with 3 to 8 boaters is unlikely to cause traffic congestions problems at this site. Additionally, visitors traveling to Clearwater Beach by boat will actually serve to decrease traffic congestion on Clearwater Beach. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinify of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed dock and 31 wet slips are consistent with the zoning, future land use and Beach by Design. The proposed dock is consistent with the size and scale of several large docks that are located in the immediate area. The Clearwater Beach area is dependent on waterfront developments to attract tourists and residents to the area. By having wet slips available to public, the proposed dock will improve the community character of the area. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on the adjacent properties. There will be no negative adverse effects visually as the docks will be constructed as either aluminum, wood or concrete floating docks fixed in place by wooden (or concrete) pilings. The construction materials and installation requirements will adhere to the Pinellas County dock construction code. There will be no negative adverse effects acoustically as this will operate as a wet slip marina only as there are no high/dry slips, no load out, no wash racks, no fueling facilities, etc. With between 3 to 8 boats using the dock daily, there is little noise expected to be generated. It is possible more usage will occur with the transient slips that will be available to the public first-come, first-served. The hours of operation of the public docks will be from lam to 11 pm and these hours will be enforced by the marina owner. There will be no adverse olfactory effects as there is no fixed sewage pumpout station or upland holding tanks proposed (except for a portable pumpout unit stored at the Dockmaster's office), trash receptacles will be emptied by marina employees daily to make sure there are no garbage odors, and there will be no fish cleaning stations onsite. 4 Exhibit B 411 East Shore Docks Revised 11-13-09 Written Submittal Requirements Flexible Development 2 Review Tourist Community Development Code• Marinas and Marina Facilities are a permitted use in the Tourist Zoning. Section 2-803 permits marinas and marina facilities subject to minimum lot area, minimum lot width, maximum height, minimum front setbacks, minimum side setbacks, minimum rear setbacks and minimum off-street parking; all of which are met with this application. E. Marinas and marina facilities. The parcel proposed for development is not located in one of the areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan as areas of environmental significance. 2. The land is not contiguous to residentially zoned property. The project entails the mooring of boats on a rental basis and the hours of operation of the commercial activities are limited to lam to 11 pm. 3. Side setback requirements are met and exceed required setbacks on the north and a reduced side setback is being requested on the south side to allow for a small boardwalk to be located adjacent to the seawall to connect to the upland side walk. 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. The design guidelines for development in the Tourist District located within the boundaries governed by Beach by Design are hereby incorporated by reference as per Ordinance No. 6680-01, § 8, 4-5-01. 5. All marina facilities shall comply with the commercial dock requirements set forth in Section 3-601.C.3 with the exception of length for which a length variance is being requested and the marina and marina facilities requirements set forth in Section 3- 603. Section 2-802H permits non-residential off-street parking subject to the following criteria: H. Non-residential off-street parkinp.• The parking lot is intended both to serve the proposed boat slips and to provide public parking spaces to those who visit or work on Clearwater Beach, not just to those businesses that are contiguous or adjacent to the subject property. The proposed parking spaces will serve to improve the parking deficit on Clearwater Beach. It is possible that other property owr-ers that do not have adequate parking for their businesses may rent some of these parking spaces. The parking lot with the additional parking spaces is not a long term plan of development for this site but rather will serve the city's need for parking until such time as the long term development plans have been defined. Due to the weakness of the current economy, the highest and best use of this tourist property is unknown at this time. Rather than have the property remain unused and vacant, the applicant would like to have the option to use the site for the benefit of the city; particularly for those who come to visit the restaurants, hotels and the nearby beach areas. 2. The parking lot is proposed on the parcel being developed. See note above. 3. The applicant is willing to install either a continuous hedge or a fence lined with bougainvillea to screen the parking spaces. The current site plan shows a fence show western side is covered with bougainvillea. 4. Any outdoor lighting will be automatically switched off by 9:OOpm. 5. All parking spaces shall be surface parking. 6. The only building proposed on the lot is the dockmaster's building Table 2-802. "T"District Flexible Standard Development Standards Use~~~ Parking Lot Minimum Lot Area (st) = 20, 000 (actual = 17, 061 upland; 99, 680 submerged) Minimum Lot Width (ft) = 100 ft (actual = 127.55 to witness at seawall for upland) Maximum Height (ft) = 50 ft (no lot building proposed; proposed shared marina office = 12.8) Minimum Setbacks (ft) Front = 15 - 25 (proposed 15) Side = 10 (proposed 10) Rear = 10 - 20 (proposed 5 as requested by DRC for the Marina District) Density Minimum = n/a Off-Street Parking= n/a (1) Specific standards for the Old Florida District and the Marina District that supersede the above regulations are set forth in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. 6 Section 2-802L permits non-residential off-street parking subject to the following criteria: L. Parking Garages and lots. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to land designated as residential. 2. Access to and from the parking lot is adequate for the lot size and number of proposed public spaces. 3. There are no gates proposed so cars will not stack up. 4. Frontage along East Shore is landscaped along the street for the length of the lot. 5. There is no parking garage proposed but rather the parking attendant will operate out of the proposed marina office as the parking lot is shared by marina occupants and the public. 6. There is definitely an unmet existing demand for additional parking in the immediate vicinity of the proposed lot. 7. The only parking structures are the paved lot and spaces. 8. The front setback on East Shore is landscaped and buffered from the street and a sidewalk is proposed along the right-of-way to improve pedestrian traffic. Beach by Design states "In order to promote apedestrian-friendly environment, overnight accommodation, commercial, mixed-use development and townhouses may be permitted a zero foot front setback. Other forms of residential development shall comply with the setbacks set forth in the Community Development Code. Although a reduced setback is allowed, a 15 ft setback is being provided. The rear setback is Clearwater Harbor and it has been augmented with landscaping as requested by DRC. 9. As noted above, the only building proposed on the lot is the marina office (dockmaster's office) which was designed in compliance with the Tourist District design guidelines. 10. The required front setback is 15 to 25 ft and as proposed is 15 ft. Therefore, the minimum setback is being met with this design although Beach by Design allows for zero setbacks. The setback provided contributes to a more active street life and provides an improved site plan with more public parking spaces available for the Tourist District. 11. There is a 5 ft rear set back being provided as discussed at DRC. 7 DOCK CRITERIA SECTION 3-601C.3. (a) through (h) [a) Use and Compatibility 411 East Shore Drive is located within the area defined by Beach by Design as the "marina district". Therefore, the proposed use of the site as a wet slip marina with 31 slips, 16 dedicated marina tenant parking spaces, 16 public parking spaces and a Dockmaster's office with restrooms and storage is compatible with the use described in Beach by Design. All 31 wet slips will be available to the public for rent on a daily, weekly or monthly basis on a first-come, first-served basis. Beach by Design envisions parcels along East Shore Drive as being part of a marina district providing a pedestrian and boater-friendly destination for tourists and residents and this application accomplishes that goal. (b) Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities Persons using the adjacent waterways for recreational or commercial purposes will not be impacted by the proposed dock or 31 wet slips. The proposed docks do not impede navigation or use of existing recreational areas. As noted above, the proposed docks do require a length variance to avoid existing submerged resources (sea grass) and maximize the number of wet slips on submerged land owned by the applicant increasing boater access at this site. The total length of the dock including tie poles is 318 ft as measured from the seawall out into the waterway. As the width of waterway is approximately 1,300 ft at this location, the facility extends only 24% the width of the waterway and does not extend more than 25% the width of the waterway. The proposed docks are also 216 ft away from the west boundary of the nearest channel, Mandalay Channel. See Plan Sheet 17. (c) Impacts to Navigation The dock as proposed will not have a detrimental impact on users of the adjacent waters or the marked channel. See Plan Sheet 17. The City allows a maximum dock length based on the length of waterfront owned. As 178 ft of waterfront is owned, the maximum dock length allowed is 133.5 ft which would only allow for 9 or 10 wet slips due to the presence of the sea grass beds. This does not allow for the highest and best use of the property or the submerged land for a public marina project. Furthermore, regulation prohibits docks from extending into a waterway by more than 25% the width of the waterway. In this case, the length of the dock is 318 ft. The width of the waterway is 1,300 ft. Therefore, the proposed dock and tie poles only extend out into the waterway 24% the width of the waterway. This allows for more than 50% of the waterway to remain open for safe navigation. The proposed dock is also approximately 216 ft away from the western edge of the channel. 8 from the western edge of the channel. As is often requested by Mr. William Morris, reflective tape will be placed on the outer tie poles as shown on Plan Sheet 16. (d) Impacts on Marine Rnvironment The dock, as designed, will have no adverse impacts to the marine environment. Please find enclosed the recent Benthic Survey Report showing the location ofthe sea grass beds along the shoreline. The proposed docks were designed to have no slips located over sea grass beds (as no slips are located within 25 ft to 40 ft of the existing seawall). The main dock walkout has been relocated to be located where the current walkout is to not impact any sea grass. There will also be several No Mooring signs and handrails proposed in locations where mooring is prohibited to ensure boats do not moor in the areas of the sea grass beds. Furthermore, the existing depths ensure that boats mooring in the slips will have a minimum of 1 ft clearance between the deepest draft of a vessel and the marine bottom at mean low water. (e) Impacts on Water Quality The mooring of 31 boats at the facility should not adversely impact water quality. The new aluminum floating docks will be installed using pre-treated pilings that are vinyl-wrapped from the mud-line to 2 ft above the mean high water line to prevent leaching of copper, arsenic and/or chromium from the timber into the water. Also, there are no fueling, marine service activities such as hull bottom scraping or bottom painting, no wash-racks, no commercial activities, etc that would contribute to a water quality problem. The applicant has also proposed a portable sewage pump-out unit to provide pump-out services to slip occupants to avoid overboard discharges of waste into the water. The facility will also provide proper trash receptacles. (ifl Impacts on Natural Resources As noted above, the dock will not impact natural resources. Please see the Benthic Survey Report which shows there are no submerged resources in the slip areas and the sea grass beds that are present along the shoreline are avoided with the design. (q1 Impacts on Wetlands Habitat/Uplands There are no wetlands, only surface waters and submerged vegetation at the site. The docks are located to avoid these resources. Handrails, No Mooring signs and Caution Sea Grass signs will all serve to prevent boats from negatively impacting these resources. 9 (h) Dimensional Standards 1. Proposed Use: The proposed use is for a mixed use dock to provide 31 boat slips to the general public on a first-come, first-served basis. The docks will provide water access for the community as addressed and envisioned by Beach by Design. 2. Property Width: ' The property width measured at the shoreline for the property is 178 ft and has been used to determine the setback and the width of the structure. 3. Setbacks: The required side setbacks are calculated as 10% of the property width as measured at the shoreline, or 17.8 feet using the property width of 178 feet. The actual setbacks as proposed are approximately 48.8 ft on the north side (at the closest point) and 10.6 ft on the south side at the closest point and only for the marginal boardwalk along the seawall. The actual slips meet the side setback as the dock is 18.4 ft away from the extended property line. Sheet 5 of the Woods marina plan drawings provides all the dock setbacks. A variance for the south side setback is being requested. The variance is only for the boardwalk portion of the dock that extends from the main dock to the south connection of the sidewalk. The "mini boardwalk" will serve as a walkway connection for the public to access the docks. 4. Length: The dock (not including tie poles) is allowed to extend 75% the width of the property, or 133.5 ft with a property width of 178 ft. The actual length as proposed is 318 feet. Therefore a variance for overall length is being requested. The variance is needed as there are seagrass beds near the seawall that extend from 25 to more than 40 ft precluding dock and boat use in this area. Also, the desire is to construct and maintain for public use as many wet slips as can be permitted on submerged land area owned by the applicant without impeding navigation and thus not extending into the waterway by more than 25% the width of the waterway. 5. Width: The dock is allowed a width of 75% the width of the property, or 133.5 ft using the property width of 178 ft. The actual width as proposed is 107 ft for the overall dock and 114.2 feet if you include the boardwalk in the overall width. 6. Area: The total decking area of the entire proposed dock structure is 4,000 square feet. 10 The width of the waterway at the location of the proposed dock as measured perpendicular to the shoreline at the tightest point is approximately 1,300 feet. The maximum length of the dock including t+:e poles is 318 ft or 24% the width of the waterway. Also, the proposed dock is approximately 216 ft from the west boundary of the nearest navigation channel, Mandalay Channel. 8. Sea grasses As noted above, there are no anticipated adverse impacts to the marine environment. Please find enclosed the benthic survey which shows the location of the submerged vegetation along the shoreline. The proposed docks and slips were designed such that there are no slips located over submerged aquatic vegetation (as no slips are located within 25 ft to 40 ft of the existing seawall). The main dock walkout has been relocated to be located where the current walkout is to not impact any sea grass. There will also be several No Mooring signs and handrails proposed in locations where mooring is prohibited to ensure boats do not moor in the areas of the sea grass beds. Furthermore, the existing depths ensure that boats mooring in the slips will have a minimum of 1 ft clearance between the deepest draft of a vessel and the marine bottom at mean low water. 11 .k+. ~~ DRAFT ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Thursday, November 5, 2009 8:30 a.m. STAFF REVIEW 9.00 am Case Number: FLD2009-10037 - 41 1 EAST SHORE DR Owner(s): Endeavor Capital Partners I Ll C/O Potter, Robert V Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Bill Woods 322 Ridge Rd Palm Harbor, F134683 TELEPHONE: 727-786-5747, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Printed: 1 I /2/2009 Times are subject to change Location: 1.113 acres on the east side of East Shore Drive approximately 250 feet north of the intersection of Causeway Boulevard and East Shore Drive. Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval in the Tourist (T) District to permit the construction of a 3,978 square-foot, 31-slip dock as a marina facility with an increase to the maximum length of the dock from 75 percent of the lot width (133.5 feet) to 178.65 percent of the lot width (318 feet) and reduction to the required side (south) setback from 17.8 feet to 11.6 feet as Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Sections 2-803.C, 3-601 and 3-603 and to permit a parking lot with a lot area of 49,353 square feet, a lot width of 175 feet, a building height of 11.5 feet (to midpoint of roof), a front (west) setback of five feet (to pavement) and 15 feet (to structure), a side (north) setback of three feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of one foot (to pavement) and 12.5 feet (to building) a rear setback of 2xx feet (to pavement from the submerged property line) and 32 parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.C. Proposed Use: Marina facilities Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 5, 2009 -Page 1 DRC Aclinn AgmJu I.I Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Include City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #701, Dumpster Enclosure on the plans. 2. Revise plans to show dumpster pad and enclosure meeting the dimensional requirements of Index #701 previously referenced. 3. Include City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #305, page 1/3, Street Lateral Detail on the plans. 4. Show location of required Street Lateral double-sweep cleanout on the site plan. 5. Show ramps in sidewalk to provide access to handicapped parking spaces. Environmental: 1 , No issues. Fire: 1 . No Issues Harbor Master: 1 . My Comments as to waterway navigation are that while this dock is well in excess of it normally permitted length, the Upland property owner both owns the submerged lands beneath the proposed docks and does not exceed 25% the width of the waterway. Further he is building to the design desires of the Marina District as set forth in Beach by Design. It is in harmony with the intended use for the waters along East Shore Drive, and several existing docks in the immediate East Shore area. I discussed the proximity of the docks to the North, aka "Frenchy's docks", with representatives from Woods Consulting and the proposed dock was set back further to the South to accommodate the existing uses/dock to the North and allow for ingress and egress from the slips on the North side of the proposed dock. It appeazs at this stage to only be a wet slip mazina with only a harbormaster bldg and no other use besides parking in support of use of private vessels. No Commercial uses were proposed (such as Para-sail rentals, PWC rentals or speed boats) from these slips. Routine public use should not place an significant increase on boat traffic in this area. v/r Bill Morris Legal: No response. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: I , See zoning comments. Parks and Recreation: I . No issues -motel being replaced by 31 slip wet slip marina, upland marina facilities and pazking lot. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 5, 2009 -Page 2 nec noa~,~ n~~~da i.i The following shall be addressed prior Community Development Board (CDB): 1. Proposed concrete sidewalk along the southeast corner of the site will block the existing drainage pattern from west to east. Please address this concern accordingly. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. Solid Waste: 1. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD ERP permit 2. A 10' drainage easement measured from the southern property line shall be dedicated to the City of Clearwater. Please contact City's real estate manager at 727-562-4754 for information on required easement document. 3. On Paving/Grading and Drainage plan, please refer storm sewer structures to their details on the detail sheet. Show details for structures S-2 and S-3. 4. Include in the drainage report the soil analysis indicating the seasonal high water table level, water table, and double ring test at the pond area. Show that proposed pond recovers within 24 hours based on the double ring test result. 5. Top of bank elevation is inconsistent between the plans and the cross section B-B. Top of bank shall be at elevation 5.00 at a minimum to meet the City's free board criterion. General notes 1.DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all documentation again for review Dumpster enclosure needed and shown on detail sheet built to city specifications Traffic Engineering: 1 , Prior to a building permit: Provide a current City of Clearwater accessible parking stall and sign detail use Index No. 118 &119 (http://www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index.asp). 2. Provide a curb ramp detectable warning detail per Florida Department of Transportation Standards use Index 304 page 6 of 6 (http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/rd/RTDS/08/304.pdf). 3. Show on the plans how a wheelchair may be used to access building without having to maneuver behind parked vehicles. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 5, 2009 -Page 3 URC Asian Apende I.1 1 . The architectural drawings show a five foot wide sidewalk around the marina office. This would encroach into the parking space, drive aisle and extend over the property line. Revise 2 . One door opens into the drive aisle and the other into the parking space. It seems that someone could become pinned in the restroom by an automobile. Revise 3 . Dimension south setbacks. Revise 4 . The second use will be considered a pazking lot 2-802.L, not anon-residential off-street parking lot. It appears you are requesting a front (west) setback from 25 to 5 feet and a side (north setback from 10 to 3 feet and a side (south) setback from 10 to 1?. This will require a Comprehensive Infill Application. Address flexibility criteria in 2-802.L. Revise. Also revise written submittal as neccessary. 5 . Show wheel stops in all parking spaces. Revise 6 . Beach by Design VII.6. requires all surface pazking areas to be landscaped so that the view of such parking facilities from public roads, sidewalks and other places is determined by landscape material instead of asphalt. Provide more landscaping in the front (west) buffer. 7 . 2-803.C.6.e. Comprehensive Infill criteria requires appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Provide enhanced landscape design. 8 . Proposed dumpster location is not appropriate along the waterfront. Enclosure will be 6 feet in height on the waterfront, this is not permissable. Find an alternate location for the dumpster. Staff would suggest the location be on the north edge of the property. This would require a loss of a few spaces, result in angled parking with one way (north) flowing traffice and another egress point. Revise 9 . This is a vacant lot. Staff will not support 11 pazking spaces in a row. Revise. 10 . Provide interior landscape square footage for the respective areas on the landscape plan. 1 l . What is the "panel board" on the west elevation? 12 . Clarify. Will the marina be staffed 7 days a week between the hours of 7AM and 11 PM? 13 . Clazify. How will required mazina parking spaces be designated? 14 . Acknowledge. A condition of approval that no marina tenants or owners conduct any commercial business from any slips at this marina. 15 . Acknowledge. A condition of approval that there be no fueling facilities or fish cleaning stations at the marina. 16 . Provide a dimension from the submerged property line. Revise. 17 . Site does not appear to be pedestrian friendly. Provide a paved access point to dock. 18 . Show solid waste can sites. Revise. 19 . Describe how the paid parking spots will function. How will the fee be collected? Who will collect it? Where? Other: No Comments Notes: Sufficient - To be placed on the 12/15/2009 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 11/13/2009. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Additional DRC comments received at 11-05-09 DRC meeting: Planning: 20. Pursuant to Beach by Design "Marina District" a minimum setback of five feet shall be provided for all paved surfaces. 21. Pursuant to Beach by Design "Marina District" parking areas should be screened from Clearwater Harbor. Augment landscaping on the east side. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 5, 2009 -Page 4 URC Action AgenJe I.1 :[#: 2009216003 BK: 16672 PG: 321, 08j14/2009 at 03:15 PM, RECORDING 6 PAGES :?52.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $10803.80 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS (:OUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERIC: CLKDMC6 ~~ Sd. ~tD .- . Doc ~ lo~a3 ~~ `/~ ,1 ,, ,, ,, ,, __ ,, -~' ~`~'> ,, ,, , .,. Prepared by and Return too: ~~~ ~~ ~` ~`. Joseph W. Gaynor, Esquire ~~ ~~ Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP ~ ` - ,~ P.O. Box 1368 - - ." - _ Clearwater, Florida 33757-'1368 ~~ ~' ,, ~' - " Telephrme: 727-461-1818 ~ , , __= ;. .~ '> STATUTORY WARRAtCI`fY= DE~R.,,,~' ,~ -'HIS INDENTURE, is made on .S ~' ~I', `''~; ~ 2009, between ENDEAVOR CAPITAL PARTNERS I, LLC, a Florida limited li~bility'company ("Grantor"), whose post office address is 121 Moonachie Averrtf~,-M'oona~hie;'NJ 07074, and 411 EAST, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantee"), whose post office address is c/o Robert Potter, Esq., 911 Chestnut Street, ~C:I(ra~rwater, F'L,' 33756. ' 1A.17:~.TESSETH: ~,`, Grantor, for and ,~i,'cori~id'~ration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other :good and valuable consideration to Gr~ntoY lr~ hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby_ ac~Cr~ivledged, has granted, bargained and sold to Grantee, and Grantee's heirs„ ~aec~ssocs,and assigns forever, the following described property (the "Property"), situated in Rinell~s County, Florida: ~~ ~~ ,, , ~ ~ , ,~ --- ' ~` `--- SEE AT-(-ACHED EXHIBITA --- '~,`, ',`.Subject to those items shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. .\ ,`~~ ~~ `, -~~rantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said Property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all p«:rsons whom:~oever. ~fhe tax parcel number for the aforedescribed Property is: ~ ~ , 08/29/15/02592/0030/0070 ;,~ Note to Administrator: Th.e consideration for this conveyance is $.1,543,323.00 ~~ PINELLAS COI:fNTY FL OFF. I2EC. BK 166''2 PG 322 IIV WITNESS WI~EREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's .A.,.. .J C,,...a t, _.._ •ax_... away aillu rGGi u~at QvVYC YYIItICI 1. Signecl, sealed and delivered in the presence of: ,, ~, ~, ~, -_ ~ , - __--! hand and sea[~the~ ~~ '~' i ~ .`. .\", ~'" ' - ,, , ., . ENDEAVOR CAPITAL PARTNERS I;~ '~ ~" LLC:, a Florida limited IiabNity~rb~npatty~' .,'--_ By: !ts I~Ranag'sng h1e'~`;ber: ~, ,. ,, ,, By: ~'~'- -~ " E ec ~~~ar, Mar~~ger/Interim ,; (Wanaging.yl~rhber Committee ,~ ", , ,, " ;" _- , , ,', ", ~> ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~, ~, _, " , ~, . COUNTY OF '-' "', The foregoing instrument w~; at~knowledged before me this ~ day of July, 2009, ley Eric Lear, as IM~r;rrger/Interim Managing Member Committee, on behalf of the company. ,"j~e-~; ~[is, ~, persond~lly known to me] [has produced ~i'.r l~r~;~.~.-~ ~~.~:;~a as identificatio ~ "~ ~~ ~ . ~ ` `` ~. ~ - - ___ ~, ~ - _ --- ~. i ~ - - ., ., .` ~ .` ~ ,, , '~ ~, _ . .;~ ~~~ ~, .\`~ ~ - Notary ub is .r ~^ ~ ~~ ~~~ Print name ~~'<<n J ~_r_:=~ci~ : ~r ~ r.~ i . ~ ~ ~~ My commission expires: ; ~ ~ Q ;, ~., : ~ . ~ ~ rublb d Nw ~i, ~ yt i~ IArsh 4?, IIO14 2 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16672 PG 323 ~~ , ~~~ ~,-.u,~,~ .u Signature~`~~ ~ ~~~ Print :name ~~ Si a,tu e ~ ~~~ Print na STATE OF ~Itk~i~r4 ~, ~, ~, __ ~ , '--~ '~ '~ '> ~~ ,~ By:_ - - -_ ~-~ Peter Marks, Manager/1nf~r~~,'~; Managing Member ~pmmitte~~, '" ,~ ~~ - ,~ -~~' -- ,, ,. '~~~ _-- ~, .. ,, ' _= ,~ ,~ ,, <, ,` ` ;, __ , - ~ ., ~'> ~ ~, 'fhe foregoing instrument was ~~ckgowled~ed before me this f ~ day of July, 2009, by Peter Marks, as Man~~erNn'~er~aZ~lblanaging Member Committee, on behalf of the company. He ,[~s~ J~e~sdnally ! known to -me] [has produced '. ~ ~'- ' ' _ as identification]. ,, ,;~ '~' v ~.wa(oa+ =~''" _ ~ ~,tycaYaN~s1oH~>39ae2toe s•: ~~~~ ~ ~ EXPIRES:1Une ~8, ~l913 =~~~ ~ ~Onaea 71w wary Ruote un8erv~kMs ,~ ~~ , ,, ____ ~,~, ~, , ., ; , '~' ~; ,, ' ~' , , .' ~~/h o ary Public mt name ~rv-y~ zr IUD ,OA~ My commis n expires: 3 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16672 PG 324 Batt ~/~.~ VPrin n~~me ~i~n~t;ir i 1 1.~1 l~ IL 'C.J UK~ STATE OF ~(~, COUNTY O ,, ~, ~, _. , ~, r --__, , gy. - - icholas rnev e, Manager/,~~ ~ '~' ;% Intarim 11Aa~n~nin IlAarriF,er ~...~ . Committee - - - ,- - - ~, ,' '. , ., ~~ ~~ ,~ ,~ __ _ '. ,, ~;- .,' __ ~~ ~~ ~, ., __ , The foregoing instrument was acknowledged IbefoY~~.me this: ~~~ day of July, 2009, by Nicholas Carnevale Eric Lear, as Manager/fn~~:rjnj-'Managing Member Committ e, on behalf f the company. He [is person~Hy;kr~mwrS to me] [has produced ~~+ ~nSe__ ---`~._~:, ~~ ~ identificationl. ,, ' Nof u li "~ <,~, ' ~, ~, Pri~ii;~ name ~ (~~.~ ~~fe~G~ ~' - ..,,..~<~~` -. -;- ;~,' ,_i~ljrcommissionexpires: `~' a -r,`' .'> ~. ~ . ,~ ,. ~~ . ` - ~ , - ~. ~~ . . ~ ~ -- ~, \ '` ~~~. ., , , - '. '" p ~ :~~s _ _ ~, ~ .;~ ~~,.~,~,f_~ ~~:(~~. ~ 4Q~ ~~~~~Ucfl~aa~tr~ 4 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16672 PG 325 ,, ~, ~, ~, ,, ,~ I:XIIIBIT A ~ ~ ' ~, , ,- The :3outh 1/2 of Lot 6 and all of Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block C, BARBOUR.=[1AORftQW SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat ~,ook 23;,Pa~e 45, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. ',;~, ; ; __, __ Including the submerged lands being a portion of Lots 7, 8, 9 an~~t~e Sou#k~~%2 of Lot 6, Bioc;k C, BHRBOUR-MGRRGVV SUBDiV15iGN, according to the t~'ap or piex thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 45, of the Public Records of Pineljas_E~qunty, Florida, being further described as follows: ' - Comrnence at the Southwest corner of said Lot 9; thence S90°00'00"E, along the southerly boundary line of said Lot 9, a distance of 128.25,feet ts~;a point of intersection with the face of a seawall for a pointt of beginnir~gt fhecc~fL~rr"the following three (3) courses along the face of said seawall;, (~~~ ~, I,V;I ~°~~21 "W, 154.60 feet; (2) N10°40'24"W, 17.04 feet; (3) N04°19'32"W, x,13 fe~f ~o a point of intersection with the Northerly boundary line of the South '.iz ~~ajd Lot,t;; ,thence, departing the face of said seaw;311, run N90°00'00"E, along the said' Northerly'~oiindary line of the South 'h of said Lot 6, a distance of 195.97 feet to a paint of intersection with the Easterly boundary line of said Lot 6, said Easterly lute ~ al:sa, b~ing'~~he Westerly line of the Government Channel; thence S04°09'12"~,~ along~.th~ maid Westerly line of said Government vi~aiirici, a ui3tar'iCE Oi i~%t.,~o yet lv,ttiuC ouuth6aSt cVr~ier UI $clltJ Lo"t 9; [fleflCe N90°t)0'00"W, along th~~~aid`~Sot~th~~rly`boundary line of said Lot 9, a distance of 171.90 feet back to th~~p6int of'b~ginriing. ~., Said :submerged land area being ones and the same as described in that certain Quit Claim Deed r~r~orded; in`~:R. Book 15973, Page 2565, public records of Pinellas Coun4:y, Florida further described as follows: The submE<rgetl~tands ~Ctj'acent to the South 1/2 of Lot 6, and adjacent to Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block C, ~~Kbatir=l~l6rrow Subdivision, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book~;2~; _ P~ge'~5, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. More particularly de~~ritied~as ~thg lands bounded on the West by the Easterly boundary line of said Sou~M,'.~ of,t~ot 6 and Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block C; on tiie North by an extension Easterly of •;'~the No?t11, boundary line of the said S~~uth '/ of Lot 6 to the channel in Clearwater Bay `lying [=as1:' of said Lots; on the South by an extension Easterly of the Southern boundary of t~t~9'to the Westerly boundary line of said channel; and on the East by the Westerly boundary line of the channel. 5 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16672 PG 326 ,, ~, ~, ~, __ '- ~~'~ !EXHIBIT "B" - - - - - _ ., ,~ Perrvritted Exceptiions ; ; ,~,' 1) Applicable land use and zoning restrictions.. ~:_ 2) Any dispute as to the boundaries caused by a change in the locakion of anjr, ~'.; water body within or adjacent to the land prior to Date of Policy, arld any ; ; adverse claim to ail or part of the land that is, at Date of Poficjc;,nr'was_,";~' previously under water. ,',' ,, '- - - 3) ?'axes and assessments fcr tt,e year 2009 and subseque~t,years.~; ;~ 4) Due to all or a part of the land described herein being artiflcialJy~At~d in land in what was formerly navigable waters, this policy is subject to the right of the United States Government, arising by reason d;;tbe United States Government's co^tro! ^ver navigable waters in tllE~tq~terE,',sY>Of navigation anu commerce. ~"-~ .'~,',~ 5) Restrictions, dedications, corn~itions, reserir~atians; ~~'sements and other matters shown on the plat of [3AR60~?R-Mt~~ROW SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Pacie~s~ ~~, 6~fidele~ing any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitaiiori'gr•'discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions o f restrictigris violate 42 USC 3604(c). 6) Assumption of mortgagefrort~ ~,nd~avdr Capital Partners I, LLC, a Florida limited liahility ~Ompa~v tn,~~~i~h~~~« B?r!k cf Tarn^a B~„ f~iQd N^-^" 2'' -~ p. u~r nw ,u, v~ i L, 2007 in Book 1569,8; Pa~~e 68, together with Assignment of Rents and Leases recorded in Bo~1i 15698,Page 77 and Financing Statement recorded in Book 15698, Page~~, and'the t~.rms end conditions thereof. 7) Subject to the rl'~~'s, if any, of the State of Florida or Trustees of the Internal Improv~ment.'i`r~a~#;Fund to any portion of the Property lying easterly of the property desc~ip~d iri that certain deed from the Trustees of the Internal Imp~ov~Knent F.urid, as Deed fr:17411. ~, . -- '.' ,~, - - - ~,~ , . ., '~ ~ ,~~ ~, '~ ~ ~'. , , _ ,' 6 ~~I~~~~LII~ ~--~~~fl? ~v ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~1~ "l, ~_{y_ i ~.r= 3' .= ''~-~ppi s _-~ Y1';s . ~ E ~fc '"iiCC~\ii'' t Ji ea ~~d E~:: c ;-m s~. ~. ~" °s ~ ~~ { ~,.' ~~. .} ~. 1' :' DESCRTPT/ON AZZ Ika1 part of Zhe North 6956., f Zhe South 1S75fd, of the Nortk one-half CNz) of Seciz'on 8s Tawnskip 29 Souihs RangelSEasf wkech lies bet wean Zhe Cen Zer ZLne of Zhe con cre ie pa /emen7 as it rrow exists cn Zhe CG fy of Clearwatc ~ FZorc dc~ known as '4anda Zay Road (or MandaZay~Bou Ze rard~~ and Zhe Govern men? ckasrne7 Ln Clea:~waZer ,° y. AND MORE SPECI FIeALLY DfseRIBED A FOLLOWSe From Zhe poini fin Zersee iaon of Zke meddle Zane of Gu Zf Veew B7vdr with the Easi and West ha Zf-secitcn Zi ne of saed Secieon B a hown on the pI t of Lloyd-While -Skinner Sub., record d ac Plai Book 13 Pages 12 and13, of Zhe pubtee ecords of P<nelZas Coaniy Flari da ih<nce N27 =55'29"E, 995.9Gfi. for P. O. B.r~whfch paint es also 880fZ. North of t7ie Souik boundary of saG'd Ea:~i and West half-sac ii on~ Ze rtes at tTre ier>ncn us a Zane aZ r<ghZ 9le iTrera Zo~s ZIr<n ce N6=3/'E, 699.52fi.r along fTie Cen Zer Zzne of Zhe concrete pave' ~ as cZ now exri Zs on Mandalay Road~r Monda lay b'IvJ~, Zo Zhe North boundary of above described tracts Zlsence E s7 720f~ rrsore ar Zes ~ pares Zle7 to sa ad East and Wesi Ira Z~-sectLOn ZGbser is Zhe above wren 7<onrd Government ChanneZr Zhenc< Sou Zher Zy a7ony Fhe Wesi Zrne of saedc7,an>x7 :ro a parni on t7re Soaih boundo y of saed Zraci 850fZ 'wore or less Eas;< of Zhe P. O. B.r thence West along saed South iraund .y B50fZ. . more or Zess io. Zhe P.O.B. D EDT CAT! ON T PAaL F. RANDOLPN aS traefee. Or /E. BARBOUR and KRTNAR/NE N. BARHOUR, has band and w<fer hereby eerie Zkai T am Zhe owner f Zh< above descr<bed traei of Zand plaited as HARBOUR -MoRreow .9/aD/Y/e/ON as,d ZAo7 I d dG'cate fo Zhe pabZei a77sireeZs, drvvesr bairtevards and Public ptoces os skown on skis pZa7 of Zhe subde'vis<on ofsacd Zand. ~ ~ .,-~ '/ < ~ % Y Seel d Syned and delivered Paa/l F. Aon olpTc a ruses e {or Zn zThe p.<s nce of• - ,T E.B rbo<. and /t TF..r.nc A!f3 bo..r n~ . .~'.l' '%r r-.l w,in hr.,band and wefe. nom; ACHNOWLEDGEMENT SfaFe ofFlorrda, Cou n Zy of Pcne ZZas: ~- I kereby cerZfy IhaZ on Zhis~day of J Iy 1990 A.D.,before me personally ppear<d PAVC F. RA oL PN Zo me known ~ b< lire per ors dcscr<bed cn and who e,Yecu Zed tJre {orey <rry cerZef<cafe and ded<caZeon and ack Howie dyed tTie exeeui<on lr< cof Zo be his own ~ ice ct and d rd as ~ use e for T. E.D rbour grid Kollrorine N. harbour, hasbando>sdw f r for Zhe uses and purposes Zbaicas, menz<oned. ~:~:~,,.~~. m e~. Nafory Pabl c,'SZaee ofFlorrd a7 torye ny eommrsseon erp<ies ~,lf. ~?.3- Approvedfar Zhe C<ty of CZearwa ieC Flareda, Ihcsa 1940 A~D. e y noyer Approved far Zke~aard of CcunZy Commrss<on<rs J PineZZ6s County',. Flor<dar thrs?3 day of Ju Zy 1940A.D. -~9~9~/1~~,u,~6,~~ ouniy Es9r ~r 1 L JL ~ L I L -_ _ ~ ~PgGM _-J Sr. __ . ~,e ~ J ,e A h s L - ,.' 35 z4 q°' k !j7~ JO A 8 9 O -' . y 5 1 » h a ,a 1 ~= - ~ - 1 V ~ -,~. ~~r=roe u 3 __~ o I~ Engineers lerieficc.Zran: ~ ' Iliereby certif ZhaZ Zh as is s correct repre- n7aZcon of Z~ Zand as .s bde'vi ded Zhal Zke dlmenseans, nytes and 7<ngt,6s are earrec7; Z~ t permanen} ref: once ~rronumenis X re been placed ..end <~Za.b7<shed «s eaZ7 d ~~ under Seci<on 7 Chapter 10275 of Zhe• Act:• ~ fJe L9islaZ~re oftli<SZaZd ~Floreda,Y937. ,~/~~ July(,2~1940. Rcgls><r~dSurveyor'7B Map Output ' r'-- Title to display on Map: HDR _ ~ r ~ ME MtJ f71AL t asiR ~ _ , ~ gEGQN IE _~',~ Legend straeta Parcels P MHD R Zoning LIIR LMDR MOR - - C ~ sA141IlR ^ IIDR A1tIP C D oa ^~ . 1RT D 4&'R rc . J F ^ ~ I aou:nty ~- _-t t11~ Pinellas County Cities Pinetlas ~nuniy Page 1 of 1 ~I ~i ~, I~ I~ http://publicgis.myclearwater.com/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=Zoning&ClientVersio... 10/1 /2009 Map Output ' Title to dis la on Ma : ~ ~~. ....j . ... 1 e' ~ ,~~. ; Le gC nd 5traats IIW ~ ~ Parcels BAYMONT ST Fvtura Land lJao .: ~a > ~~~ xs Q' ~}-~ >' air . RL n ? ~~ J.~ R:LAi {u ~~ f0 ~ .. ~ ^ RM i~ C `~ -~~C I~i C!G ^ RFI I~nM~ _ s" R.bL - ~ R.~6G 8105 4 ~ ~MEM[lR1AL CSYWY '~- (~ ^ Rxx~t RF41 T/U ~ c;p CL ~~ „ ~~.- fL , 1f F~ !G RSr sr ~ P . a O R.'4~ S~coHO sr,,.,_~ ~ Il,s ~ OEVON DR .. ® T!U `~ e 1VAT[R C !31) C RIl Pinellas Couniy Cities Pinellas County Page 1 of 1 http://publicgis.myclearwater.com/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=Zoning&ClientVersio... 10/ 1 /2009 To view most current version, visit www.municode.com. § 2-802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 2. The design of all buildings complies with 05; Ord. No. 7576-06, § 1, 2-2-06; Ord. No. 7723, the Tourist District design guidelines in § 1, 2-15-07; Ord. No. 7835-07, § 4, 1-17-08; Ord. Division 5 of Article 3. No. 7926-08, § 7, 7-17-08) (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6928-02, §§ 17-20, 5-2-02; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 38, 12-15- Section 2-803. Flexible development. The fallowing uses are Level T~vo permitted uses permitted in the 7buriat °T" District sulayject to the standards and criteria set out in this section and other applicable provisions of Article 3. Table 2-803. "T" Flexible Development Standards Min. Lot Min. Lot Nlax. Min. Mirx. Area Width Height Frorrt Nlin. Side Rear Min. Off-Street User" (sq. ftJ (ftJ (ft.)r1~ (ftJr" (ftJr1J (ftJr" Density Parking Alcoholic Beverage Sales 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 5 per 1,000 GFA Attached Dwellings 50-100 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 30 nnets/ 2 per unit 10 000 a 2 spaces per at- tached dwelling unit and as deter- 30 units/ mined by the com- munity develop- Comprehensive Infill n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a acre; 40 ment coordinator Redevelopment Project rooms/ for all other uses acre based on the spe- cific use and/or ITE Manual stan- dards Limited Vehicle Sales and 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 4-5;spaces per Display 1,000 GFA Marinas and Manna Factli- 6,000 50 25 10-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 1 apace per 2 slips ties Mixed Use 5,000- 50-100 35-100 0-15 0-10 0-20 30 units/ Based upon use 10,000 acre reyuirements Nightclubs 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 10,000 100 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 3-4 spaces per 1,000 GFA 2.5 spaces per 1,000 SQ FT of lot area or as deter- Outdoor Recreation/Enter- 5,000 50 35 5-15 0-10 10-20 n/a mined b the com- tainment munity develop- ment coordinator based on ITE Man- ualstandards Overnight Accommodations 10,000- 100-150 35-I00 0-15 0-10 0-20 40 rooms/ 1 per unit 20,000 acre Restaurants 5,000- 50-100 25-1.00 0-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 7-T5 spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA Retail sales and services 5,000- 50-100 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 4-5' spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA Supp. No. 22 CD2:76 Supplement 24, June 2009 a (D .-,. N N O O G b 'U d tV CHART 2-100 PERMITTED USES IIee Categories IDR I.iVIDR MDR M®R HDR Ml~ C D O I IRT OSR P CRNCOD lII~TCOD Residential Accessory dwellings X X X X X X Attached dwellings X X X X X X X Community residential homes X X X X X X X X Detached dwellings X X X X X X X X Mobile homes X Mobile home parks X Residential infill projects X X X X X X X Nonresidential Adult uses X X Airport X Alcoholic beverage sales X X X Animal grooming and or board- ing X X X Assisted living facilities X X X X Automobile service stations X X Cemeteries X Comprehensive infill redevelop- ment project (CIRP) X X X X X X X Cangregate care X X_ X X Convention center X Educational facilities X X X X Governmental uses X X X X X X Halfway houses X Hospitals X Indoor recreation/entertain- ment X X X X Light assembly X Manufacturing X Marinas X its aad marina facilities X X X X O C ~• n ~ ~ O yz ~• ~C ~ Z c~ ~_ tJ C r m o 'b O• z ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~. O ^* d ~ t1 ~ n• O W n O Beach by Design ~~ i __ ,~ ~.~. C. Marina District The area to the east of Poinsettia Avenue, north of Causeway Boulevard and south of the Clearwater Beach Recreation Complex is a mixed-use district occupied by residential, motel and limited commercial uses in at-grade structures primarily one-two stories in height. This district is the northern gateway to Clearwater Beach and has a high profile location along Clearwater Harbor and visibility from Causeway Boulevard. The parcels of land located on the east side of East Shore Drive have frontage along Clearwater Harbor and those on the west side also have frontage on Poinsettia Avenue. Parcels on both sides of East Shore Drive are relatively shallow and the future redevelopment opportunities are limited by this existing parcelization. 14 Beach Gp Desig~r. A Pre/irninary Design for C/eani~ater Beach City of C/enn~~ater, Florida Beach by Design i District Vision 1 lie Li~~lt~t ~ priiui. iv~.uLivu aavii~ deal V/aLVl ai vr, aw close proximity to the City's marina and to the beach make the District a particularly desirable place for tourists and residents alike. Beach by Design supports the redevelopment of the Marina District into a pedestrian and boater-friendly destination -`hat includes a mix of hotels, commercial, restaurant, residential and mixed-use development, as well as a variety of dock facilities and water related uses. To assist in creating this destination waterfront neighborhood, the District should capitalize upon its gateway location. Beach by Design supports the creation of a District focal n i i i t r_ C~1_ __. i"1..:_.~ ,J point gerierauy IOCdI.eU $L llie LIILeLSe0t1011 Vl LQSL J1lvLe Liiv~. auu Papaya Street and along Clearwater Harbor. Development located entirely or partially within 200 feet north and 200 feet south of Papaya Street shall be limited to the District's preferred uses, which are restaurants, retail, hotels and/or mixed uses. Stand-alone residential development siiaii riot be peririitted iii this location. The design of development in this location should capitalize on this prune waterfront location and provide public access to the waterfront where Papaya Street terminates at Clearwater Harbor. Determinations of whether a pro, ect constitutes amixed- use development will be made by weighing the following factors: VVllether tl.e propCSed :T::X of reS;~ential nunr~ r~nn-rPgiwlPntial i~ePc will further the visio~l of the District; the percentage of street/waterfront frontage occupied b;,~ one or more uses; percentages of overall project devoted to each =.ise; and/or portion of one or more floors devoted to a mixture of uses. Ileiglet Incentives and I~equie~ed I'nkDlic Arnenities The Marina District's location it the heart of the tourist district presents prime opportunities or tourist-oriented and mixed-use development. Existing parcel sizes and depths as well as lack of public amenities inhibit the District's redevelopment anri rntPntial fnr c.rPating a r1P,srinatign ~n~atPrfi•ont nPinhhorhood. To realize the District's vision, Beach by Design offers development incentives of increased bui ding height in exchange for redevelopment proposals with larger lot sizes, preferred District uses and the .Inclusion of specified public amenities. Projects nor contributing to a public amenity shall be limited to two stories above parking if to gated on tl- e east side of East Shore Drive and four stories above parking on the west side of East Shore Drive. To assist in attracting people to the District, Beach by Design con±emplates the construction of a public boardwalk along Clearwater Harbor from Baymont Street south to the soutr~ern boundary of the District to connect with the City marina's boardwalk located under Causeway Boulevard. Additioncaly, streetscape improvements should be implemented along Baymont and Papaya Streets to create a pleasant pedestrian environment and visual connection between Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf of Mexico. streetscape elements should also be used to identify public entrances to the boardwalk at Papaya and Baymont Str~:ets along Clearwater Harbor. Development io~~ated on Ciearv~ater Harbor utilizing a height bonus as outlined in the table below must provide to the City of Clearwater a 15 foot wide board~/alk constructed within a 20-foot public access easement adjacent to the seawall, either over the water or on the lard as determined by the City. Any non- waterfront parcel using the height bonus shall contribute financially to the Papaya and Baymont Street streetscape or the public boardwalk, in a manner determined by the City. The following table shall guide allowable building height in the Marina District: 15 Beach by Design: A Prelirninarv Design for Cleanrater Beach Ciry of Clean~~nler, Florida ~eacih by ®esign JEIeight Bonus Schedule for the Marina District Land Area with Contribution to the Public Boardwalk or the Streetscape Maximum Height for Residential Development Maximum Height for Preferred Uses- Mixed Used Development and Overnight Accommodations >0.5 acres on one side of East Shore Drive 40 feet 60 feet >0.5 acres on both sides of East Shore Drive SO feet 70 feet 1 acre on one side of East Shore Drive 50 feet 70 feet __ 1 acre on both sides of East Shore Drive 60 feet 80 feet 2 acres on one side of East Shore Drive 60 feet 80 feet 2 acres on both sides of East Shore Drive 75 feet 100 feet* *Additional height may be granted pursuant to the transfer of c'evelopment provisions only for overnight accommoaations ~~ith SO or mote units and zcp to a maximum height of 130 feet. 16 Beach by Design: A Prelirnii~ary Design for Clearwater Beach Ciry of Clearwater, Florida Beac;h by ®esign Additional Incentives In addition to the height bonuses, Beach by Design would permit the consideration of the vacation of East Shore Drive to assist in the creation of larger sites to facilitate redevelopment with a higher quality of architectural and site design. Vacai:ion requests will only be considered in increments of one full block provided concerns related to access, traffic circulation on the beach, emergency vehicle access, utilities, etc. can be mitigated and funding mechanisms are identified to the satisfaction of the City. The Marina District also supports the maintenance and expansion of dock facilities that serve existing and new uses, as well as those that serve the broader public. To assist in the creation of commercial dock facilities, Beach by Design waives any additional on-site parking that may be required to support such facilities provided on-street parking is provided adjacen~: to the upland site. Beach by Design further contemplates that additional flexibility may be provided. regarding number and location of parking spaces to serve overnight accommodations. Belle Harbor enjoyment of the waterfront and promotes ;pedestrian-oriented deveioyinetrt, the foilcwing requirements shaii apply to the Marina District. Should there be any di ~crepancy between these provisions and Section VII. Design Guidelines and/or the Community Development code:, these provisions shall govern. Setbacks In order to promote a pedestri<n-friendly environment, overnight accommodation, commercial, mixed-use development and townhouses may be permitted a zero foot front setback. Other forms of residential development shall cpmply with the setbacks set forth in the Community De~~elopment Code. Setbacks adjacent to the public boardwalk may incorporate pedestrian-oriented design features inclt:ding, but no limited to courtyards, steps, entryways, arcades, plaza and outdoor seating areas. To ensure the provision of adequate east-west view corridors between properties, pudding side setbacks shall be no less than 25% of the building height or a minimum of 10 feet, whichever is greater. A minimum setback of five feet shall be provided for ~,li paved surfaces. The pub:: is boardwalk, pavement accommodating cross-ac-pens drive aisles and shared parking areas shall be exempt from any side setback requirements. The Belle Harbor condominium site was recently redeveloped consistent with the High Density Residential (HDR) zoning district provisions and no changes are anticipated for this parcel. In the event conditions change, the HDR District will govern future redevelopment or improvements to this property Site Design Criteria To ensure that the scale and character of development in the Marina District provides the desired setting for public Beac/s by Design: A Prelinzirtary Desigi7 for Clearwater Bench Buildin Desi n Along_the Public Boardwalk The design of facades fronting Clearwater Harbor is critical in creating the atmosphere along the public boardwalk. These facades should receive a high level of design treatment incorporating elements such as changes in plane, architectural details, variety in color, materials and textures, defined entrances, doors and windows and other appropriate details based on the architectural s*yle of the building. 17 ®s City of Clean~~ater, Florida beach by ®esign Parking Along Clearwater Harbor Parking garages/areas should be internal to the site/building and screened from ~~learv~.~ater Harbor. Such areas shall be architecturally integrated with tha design of the building. 18 Beach Gy Desig~r. A Preli»tinan~ Deaigis for C/eanvater Beach City of Cleanvater, Florida BENTHIG ST~JDY 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE, CLEARWATER, 1=LORIDA Prepared for: Peter Marks 107 Moore Street Princeton, New Jersey 08540 Submitted by: Woods Consulting 1714 County Road 1, Suite 22 _- Dunedin, FL 34698 727-786-5747 Fax 727-786-7479 October 1, 2009 Y VV~oods Consulting Environmental Permitting Marine Engineering Hydrogeology Land Planning 1714 County Road 1, Suite 22 Dunedin, FL 34698 October 1, 2009 Peter Marks 107 Moore St. Princeton, NJ 08540 Re: Benthic Survey / Bathymetry Determination Report 411 East Shore Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767 Dear Mr. Marks: As required by Pinellas County, the Department of Environmental Protection, the Southwest Florida Water Management District and the US Army Corps of Engineers, Woods Consulting performed a Benthic Survey for the above referenced project site in Clearwater, Florida.. ,The survey was performed under the guidance of William Woods, Senior Environmental Scientist on September 28, 2009. A total of eight (8) transects were swam to note the occurrence of submerged resources such as sea grasses, worm tubules, fish, crabs, oysters, algaes, etc. and to determine approximate water depths throughout the site. Please see the attached Figures 2 through 5 for the survey transect locations. The entire shoreline of the project area is hardened by a concrete sea walil. No emergent vegetation along the wall was observed. The survey area exhibits a sand bottom with minor overlying silts. Barnacles (Balanomorpha) and oysters (Crassotrea virginica) were present along the existing sea wall from the mean high water line to the bay bottom. A band of moderate to dense Shoal Grass (Halodule wrightii) was observed along nearly the entire length of the shoreline of the project area. The grass in this band ranged from 50 to 80% bottom coverage. No sea grasses were observed under the existing docking structure. Please refer to Figure 3 for sea grass locations. No other benthic organisms (algaes, macroirivertebrates, etc.) were observed at the time of the survey. Please note that approximate depths were obtained during the benthic survey. The depths, referenced to mean low water, are provided in the attached Figures 4 and 5. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions regarding this information Sincerely, William Woods Senior Environmental Scientist Woods Consulting P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\BENTHIC\Benthic Report updated 10-1-09.wpd Ofi"ice: (727) 786-5747 Fax: (727) 786-7479 Email: info~woodsconsulting.org www.woodsconsulting.org SCALE: 1" = 50' EXISTING SEAWALL ~_; FIGURE 2 ~. . W E ADJACENT DOCK S -~ CXTLNCiE a FF~C%i,ER I ~I LIFE ` -~ -- - ~-~ '-~ a - a T8 ------ \\\\ \ e / ~J o~ EXISTINGS DOCK 0 35 411 EAST SHORE DR. CLEARWATER, FL -T3 yb o ti e o y0 T T1 ww n ?- \ i i i i ~~XTEpVdfD PROPERTY LINE DOCKS m II T = TRANSECT LOCATION WOODS CON~iULTING 4 11 EAST SHORE DRIVE- WATERWAY WIDTH ±1,400 FT 7714 COUNiY ROAD 1~ SURE 22 DUNEDIN ~ 34ssa PROJECT SITE OVERVIEW WATERFRONT WIDTH 178.0 FT MHW+o.es~ MLW' -1.2s~ PH. (727 786-5747 FAx (727 78s-7476 CDNTOURS SHOI~iV .REFERENCE DEPTH AT MEAN LOl•Y IyATER rELEVA77ONS REFERENCE NA!?J-1988 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 - 2:01 pm P:\411 East Shore (401-07)1CAD\OLD CAD\EAST SHORE MASTER 10-09.dwg I SCALE: 1" = 301 FIGURE 3 J ~ ADJACENT DOCK ~~ EX~TENDE~ ~PROPER~TY LINE ~.~ - ^ al MODERR,TE TO DENSE SHOAL ° no n oo (cn ono/ nn-r-rnn n ° VI V'~VV VV-VV /U UV 1 1 VIVI COVERAGE) \:.o: 41'I EAST SHORE DR. c;LEAR~4lATER, FL ° ° ~ - u ~.0.~. .O~• .~A. ............... ° EXISTING SEAVIIALL EXISTING DOCK T4 T°6 T5 O O O T3 T2 W E S T'G ~XTEI~iDED PROPERTY LINE ° ° MODEP,ATE TO DENSE SHOAL. GRASS (50-80% BOTTOM ADJACENT DOCKS COVERAGE) ~~ J T = TRANSECT LOCATION WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE WATERWAY WIDTH ±1,400 FT 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SURE 22 WATERFRONT WIDTH 178.0 FT DUNEDIN FL 34698 SEA GRASS LOCATIONS MHW*+o.es' MLW -1.26' PH. (727 786-.5747 FAx (727) 786-7479 CDNTOURS SHOKN REFEl~ENCE DEPTH AT MEAN LOIY IyATElr "ELEl~A770NS REFERENCE Ns1l~o->9BB Thu, 01 Oct 2009 - 2:01 pm P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\OLD CAD~EAST SHORE MASTER 10-09.dwg SCALE: 1" = 30' ~ ADJACENT DOCK EXTENDELZ I'ROPER~rY LINE ~~ 0 \\\~ \ /1 1 0 \ I Imo' I ^ I T~\7n 7 1 W J \!;~ ~~. ~ it o / N -- .~~ _. _.~_ _ I \ \ R~ w / 1 ~ I I ei. ~ aD ~ .7 411 EAST SHORE DR. ,. C:LEARWATER, FL i o/ 0 1 0l 1 0 - T6 a I o T5 o 0 FIGURE 4 N K W E S EXISTING DOCK ~o T4 T3 ~O T2 \V ~~ ~-- - ° T'0- - - - - ' ~~ /" \ \ i I I i \ ~XTE~IC~R®PER-fY LIME 0 0 o EXISTING SEAWALL ADJACENT DOCKS ~----~ ~ T = TRANSECT LOCATION `WOODS CON:~ULTING 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.400 FT 1714 COUNN ROAD 1, SUffE 22 WATERFRONT WIDTH 178.0 FT PH.N(7275 786 5747 APPROXIMATE WATER DEPTHS MHW`+o.5s~ MLW' -tz8~ FAX (727) 786-7479 CDNTOURS SHOIyN REFERENCE DEPTH AT MEAN LOIy IyATER "ELE!/AAONS REFERENCE NANO->9BB Thu, 01 Oct 2009 - 2:01pm P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\OLD CAD\EAST SHORE MASTER 10-09.dwg FIGURE 5 ~-ADJACENT DOCK EX"fEN®E~ PROPER"fY LINE 3 MODF~ATE C \~\~, ~ r.Rn~c i~n_g o .~ ~ COV~EY~2AGE) 7 N .$ .7 ... .6 ~` g .4 .1 :,~, R ~ ~° RY y. n •: 411 EAST SHORE DR. C:LEARWATER, FL .O. .P~ -0. .... .......... 5 ~ ~ ~o EXISTING SEAWALL SHOAL of ~~ 0 q ~ h m ~ / 1 ~ ~o b ~>~ 0 0 TY\ yo - T6 T5 EXISTING DOCK ~O T4 0 T3 ~o T2 W E S i~ .. ~ - - ~.: ° T1 ~~ \ I I I I \ ~X~~NLJ~LJ I~R®PER~ LINE 0 0 MODERATE TO DENSE SHOAL GRASS (50-80% BOTTOM ADJACENT DOCKS COVERAGE) ~~ 1 T = TRANSECT LOCATION WOODS CON~~ULTING 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.400 FT 1714 CouNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 WATERFRONT WIDTH 178.0 FT PH.N(727~ ss 4574 SEA GRASS LOCATIONS WITH DEPTH MHW*+o.ss~ MLW. -i.za~ FAX (727) 786-7479 CONTOURS SHOI~iV REFERENCE DEPTH AT MEAN LOIY IyATE!? "ELEliA770NS REFERENCE NAl~O-1988 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 - 2:02pm P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\OLD CAD\EAST SHORE MASTER 10-09.dwg Tree Inventory 411 East Shore Drive, Clearwater, Florida October 8, 2009 Prepared by: Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist Prepared for: Howard Civil Engineering 4ou5 iiiuepei~uence Parkway, Suite 25u~s Tampa, FI.33634 Tree Ir~verirory data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could lead to faiiure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the data used in the inventory: Tree# -location -Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size -Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.). Species -Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. Condition Ratine -The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included bark. Elements or'systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net photosynthesis (good made] vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing energy. The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows: 0- A dead tree 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a catagnry #~ ecological Nest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifoliusj. Atree with a rating of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2 - A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback, cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s) can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating. 3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5 - A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of in.SP.ft nr riisPnCP nrnblems ~r ni~trit~nnal defir~anriac. !~ tree in thlS C.'.tebcrr Should hu;/C balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation. 6 - A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree. Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree. NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3-5 years. However, events such as drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely affected, have the tree inspected by a qualified International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist. This tree inventory was conducted on October 8, 2009. NOTE: The subject site, 411 East Shore Drive has no trees or palms on site. The three palms listed below are located on abutting property to the north which is at 419 East Shore Drive. City of Clearwater code requires all protected tree and palm species located within 25' of a site's property line to be inventoried. The palms listed below are located 1' from the north property line. 'T'ree Inventory Tree # Size Species Rating 1. 11' Clear trunk sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 4.0 Comments: This palm is Iflcated approximately 1.!)' dirPCtly below ar. nverhPad ~niirP that i~ connected to a street light. 2. 12' Clear trunk sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 4.0 3. 12' ClearTru,~k saual Nalm (SGuGI palmetto) 3.5 Comments: This palm has a small area of decay at the base on the west side. The decay is minor and is not debilitating. REDUCED SIZE SITE PLAN FOR TREE INVENTORY W.O. 3884.6 M lwiRl N i MNLN17,IwfW, /1fc11S nlrw l ~ Ni 1 H ~ Rwrr N r'~tln WAL Mile ... ....., rrr. src n ,t L F~ r.1` r~rtfrl~tMMMM~ L NNRrrr.Ma,1+1 rY+++lrryrl ,rl.lrlywwrllrrrw 1 rrrk.+w~rc•rwt.wrlwiw..+w ~~r.+llwR•rtrr tla\r 1+.\ r a 1r114ntarr.rrr~kr ~rrallw+f Irlrrr+w~ V Irrlr~rirrwlMY rrrrltrlrMHy r M41 r ~+M rw r, l rratw~rlrrIRIRHMrYtM~ia~rsr t wlarlrwrt~Y+Ra{w4+rr~rtM wra a tiwwrwMMl7Mwral~Rfera ,rrwffl~ ~ M~~rr/rrMNYr114M1iM'RIr KI +a~~1+M1 rrl/at+rlwtr+Mrr ryRryn,r(rFt>trfrW WrryrR ratrrrl7R W-rM/fR/rrrrR r /Itt•\ritrr4~ryrurr1Y r11 rwr~twra~wOHe~l • rHaMr Rrrl~ [MrMrIM~Mrrrrw.Mr'Ir yW rwl..µµ hr^wMr~rrM rrra+w+tr~rtwlN ~ I.IwY tMwt-YIt•iwr~ aRnr rrraM trrlr*w R t~rw,ww wtww rM F:u R I.IrIfl.y*r,1l.rgalt+rlKlrlarY ra,rrrrllarYtriwrlYra Rrrt Y RlrrRrratrltrrA /ItYwlrr,tll K >K ~:~ Yw/iw/rIr RIIM SrI L IM\tr~lRlwalaY~rAall.frtrrrl rt.r ~rr r~•t ry.tFtrtlr rrryWwwMl+ra+rrrr.r rrrlrrrll>s r rlr~rryrrtir ~rlryrr.rrr r Yrlfl.rlrK l L bO~ . rw yrrwf. .I.r.ry C l - 4 W ^ t f.rtf W M ' ~ Ir rn.rl w .~., ! rr r~j ,rri..wi... rf~ti r ~ a . a Ir ~ tlr•rY R r ,rrr M ~ ~ aM ry r~ ~r Laf A fMl"Ny S w w R~rr 10.L R .rwr r .+Wr i .rRMlrarr ~rMlr.w ..>MWrw .~rl.~r,.rlrr~ N aR ~ Y.Yr• yw.r rrrr ~ .~IWr lri~ f~M a n.nwar,r . ~ ~ ~ M .M . M r. W r iir r A WY ~`.w`" A •Ir11, M M M IrrlM~l ~ alma R rrrrR,r M 1 ~r S 0 s R v SEC T1pN 8, jWP. 29 S,, RGE. f 5 E. I'lNELLAS GpIJNTY, FLpl~lUA M. r.a q fvf r , r . r ra t .a ..a, r~. r.wrw ~wywrrrrl plow w~//inii~ awgrwtiru afr n A q 0 n ti ti a 0 5 aWlww,flNw rt wl rrrM w+r and e RrhtRl+aar woR6L alaryl w trRl Ir; 4RNR 1IJI( W, r w,rarrmlr 1 rlrur a ~wlr • rrrra rl arawrrra a YY rIfM l4 wLLfffrrr4r 10..N, rA1 rwa rq iuL a (l\lrl tw •ay y a r.,r w wu w w nr~i~wWinwK wo Rf a arllowa u a r.r y rt\ rr.uw v ..x a uw\.trrr. ta\.arrcrvrwnr I,rYrrR nrarrllror tma l arq~YLai rM,rl,r Iwr -Irtl r Irrli4 r rq rt Ir t Ywrtk Wt IIy rf V R/ rtw.r]1L4r1prrPl.r >~ rra .m.a. y.wwfw xlnr rm a nMr,w w lr. qar y M RI wrt uwU rr1 ~;~R+111i ~Yr,r r~WK W ,wl Lr.a. r r,i Ir R IR tOY rl ap lr w r, rttrr tw waa Nltwuai~ r~iwmur trrrvc rttr YrI MV +ar ru s war.sew V rn • rrrml rrrrq r .~• r•Ilw rnwR.fwrlw.rwrr ~1 wwu.Mrws olrrl r rrsr r.wa r tlra Wf r.1rYlr 1 orarM .yR II IrYVrl awa rrOril irr4 w Mw.•ri y.r,a, tvo:.. ,r.nltl rw eRwltra ur •` .r tarlwa wa.rr eF~'', . I.y~R.nlr "'~ ~ ufl .'". aarr ~~. ~;Mi a~f~m~tneecu~ , tS rYlt rttrtt , _._. r,Irtru~rMRr r~ -a [/-1 ~ YL W. t\ rlaw r1 BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 0 jjr t ~rr~ ~"so~r 9~) f:'r ~tit7 I w{u~~Il (( _ ~~ ~~ ! ~ ~ • /I I I I 1tt~ f ial s loi s II ! F ~! It +t .+ ~1 ! ! 7.{r-.~~I ~~ ~ ~~ Ater f1'2 .... d•~~ .w.wr 1......_. 4Nli rLlr rlµlryi0 ~1~1p) 'tnlwt Saar (h ~ IK n- SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # ,Vr rIV Ir1L UJG VIVLI~ TABLE OF CONTENTS SHEET 0 -TABLE OF CONTENTS SHEET 1 -LOCATION MAP SHEET 2 -EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH COLOR AERIAL SHEET 3 -PROJECT OVERVIEW SHEET 4 -PROPOSED DOCK SHEET 5 -PROPOSED SETBACKS SHEET 6 - BENTHIC DATA WITH APPROXIMATE WATER DEPTHS SHEET ? -CROSS SECTION A. - A' SHEET 8 -CROSS SECTION A - A' CONTINUED SHEET 9 -PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS SHEET 10 -PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS SHEET 11 -PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS SHEET 12 -PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS SHEET 13 -VINYL PILE WRAPPING DETAILS SHEET 14 -PROPOSED SIGNAGE AND HANDRAIL LOCATIONS. SHEET 15 -TURBIDITY CONTROL SHEET 16 -REFLECTIVE TAPE DETAILS SHEET 17 -NAVIGATION DETAILS SHEET 18 -FIRE & WATER PLAN SHEET 19 - FIRE ~ WATER PLAN SHEET 20 - FIRE ~ WATER PLAN SHEET 21 -FIRE & WATER PLAN DETAILS SHEET 22 -FIRE & WATER PLAN DETAILS SHEET 23 -FIRE & WATER PLAN DETAILS SHEET 24 -SUBMERGED LOT DIMENSIONS Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:17am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 0 ENGINEER'S SEAL ,~\`'\" I~I'''~/ rn WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR , ~ ~ ..••••••.• ~ , ~ ~ D Iv ~ .•• ••• i ~ ~ O ~ 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 • ••. ~ y n • PH. (727 786-5747 TABLE O F CONTENTS `~ ~~ y Z ~ i J J rn D FAX (727) 786-7479 • y * ~ ?~ ~ oo°o ~ a REVISIONS n i . r- ; y ~ ~ ~ ®• 9C ~ ~ o ' ~ ~" •• ~ ~ ~ • ^ ~ ' TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 •.• ~ •.~ ~ w ° o ~ •• ' ~ ~ ~ ~ •'• WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT < ••....•• ~ i ~ ~\ ter" ~ ~ WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT 59' 1 28' +0 ~ // ~ ~ '~ ~~` . . MHW MLW - ~ i T I I I ~ ~ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) ~ ~ X ~ ~ A1, ~ ~~ ~~;. .. adyx, .:.* .. k~~' :~,; ' 1 ~ '` .~ ~hla rb~r' ~~ ~ ~, ~ ~ . ~~•:- ~ , M ~ + ~~ •. ~. t, ~ . i. ._ !~I ,.~~:. .~ R -- -- - ~a _, - Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:17am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET ~ ENGINEER'S SEAL ~~ * ~i,, \\111I'I/ WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR .`~ R ~ rn \ ~ •.•••••••••••~~••% ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 1714 C UNEDINR FL 34698 ~ 22 ..• •: - D ~ PH. (727 786-5747 LOCATION MA P 6j . ~ y Z ~•~ ~ ~ J rn D FAX (727) 786-7479 a ~• - J"~D a m * N =~ ~ _ ooo~ REVISIONS a 9 C ~ ~y' ~ ~ ~ w ~ o TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 ~• C7 •: ~ ••.~ •• ~ ~ o A w ° WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT ~ ~ •••••.•.•••••'~ ~ J < WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT ~~i rFR * /~ ~~ ~rn MHW +o.ss~ MLW -l.za~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~\ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 50' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) W Eli w 0 J Z~ a`~ ~ ~ e zF- w ~ ~ w ~ ~ zW ~a w ~t O .. waO N ~ °~ r ~ ~ Twa Q, a I M I I ~ J I I ~ I I I I I I © ~ I I ° I I I ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ ® o I I I I I ° I I ~ O I I _ I ....., m I ~ O I I ° I ° ° I I I ~ I I O I I I I I I ~ I I O I I I . ° I I I I I ® O I I I I ~. I I I ~ O I I I I I I ° M O I I I I I I I I O I I N I I I ° ;')'. I r '.i .• O 5 ~.5,~ SENWALL I I '~•'. I . I ~~ '~ I I j I' ••~•,•,•'•'• I .~yl,..... . I I I 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:19am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 3 ENGINEER'S SEAL ~`'''' I I' I''/ 411 EAST SHORE DR ~ ~ * ~, RI ~ ••~~•••~•••~•• / i ~- rn N ~ ~ ~ O WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 •• ~ • y •, ~ D PH. 727 786-5747 PROJECT OVERVIEW y ; y Z =:; ~ vJ D FAX (727) 786-7479 ~~ l~ y O ro~~rn _ _ ~ ~ y * -~ m ~ w~o~ REVISIONS r :4 m N =~ ~ ; ~ Q OD /~G;• ~ ~ ^ ' pOO°o ~ W A D a A o TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 :• 11 .• ~ ~~ • ~' o c o ~ WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT i ~ '•..~~•••..••• ~; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ rn ~' WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT 28' ss' -1 W +o ~~ ~ i . . MH MLW '~i i ~ ~ I I * ~ ~ ~ ~~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 50' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) E4 ° ~ r~ /4' Z 3.0 TYP. i ~ ~ c~ g ~ • ~ ~ ° 40.0 1 40.0 ^ 40.0 44.0 a ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ a 34. Y : 34.0 ~ 7.0 I 1 I I 4.0 ~ 17. j `~ ~ ~4 O--I X . 40.0 ' ~ ~ I j ~ I • • 34.0 i • I I I 1 r I ~ ' I IW 4 I li 40.0 =--F- - I ~,1.., I ®I 1 O WIJ ~ . ~j} I 4 0'~ © . ZIF" I 1 ~ WIW ' ~ I-ao.o ~ -- la w i0 I ~ 1 O Id I o ~ ° I • 3a . I (n~ I 0 ~ j ~- 4~0 -"I I Z ~ 40 . I J I ~ ~ ~ O I ~ I~ W I ~ 34.0 j. • I W n I 4. I- 40.0 ~ ~ -~ I 4'B~D W j~ 1_ la ~~1 n i r I 3 0 TYP 1 `~ . . p I I ~ • 34.0 j • ° I LL__ I M 1 n 1 I ~ If 40.0 ~ f 0 ~-I-~ 34.3 ---I I ~ 4.0 O~ 70.9 I I 1 • 34.0 I 5.0 ~ 1 ~'~'• •:i:' O I O.O ~i~~ SEAWALL I I ~ ~'~'~~. ,Ca,, ~ I I ~:I~ 5. I 5.0 I 6.0 I ..... I ''~ SEE SHEETS 7-8 FOR 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE CROSS CLEARWATER, FL SECTION A-A' Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:19am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 4 ENGINEER'S SEAL \~~~111111/// .~ * ~~ rn WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR , ,p , ~ ..•••••••• ~ , ~ ~•• ••• i :.• •: ~ • N ~ ~ D N ~ ~ O D~ 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH, (727 786-5747 PROPOSED DOCKS j . ~ ~ ~ J J rn D FAX (727) 786-7479 D J~ ~i `•i - a m * N Ze ~ ~I oo~o REVISIONS ` ~:•'~O ~ ~j~;•• ~ '• ~ ' ^ ~ ~ w D p ~'w TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 1 300 FT ~ .• .• ~ ~ •'•••....••••~ ~~~ i ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ rn ~' , WATERWAY WIDTH ± WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT +0 59 ~ ~/ * / ~ ~~ ~\ . ML1N -i.za MHW ~ ~. I I I i ~ ~ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 50' lil 4 9 Z ~ ~ 2 COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # , ~,y e N I~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 58.5 - I I I I it I I I I I 1 I I I I z IJ I I ZI w a Wig a 48.8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ~'. © `~ © ~e ® c © ` O ma 0 0 0 aM O O . O r 18.4 I --- I I I I I I W I jZ WIJ Dj}' ZIP I W I I a wi0 318.0 i a , TOTAL LENGTH I I I I e I I I I i I I I - 52.1 ~I t I 1 I I I 10.6 (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) I 107.0 I TOTAL 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE WIDTH CLEARWATER, FL Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:20am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 5 ENGINEER'S SEAL III ~'~' ~'''~~, \~\ ~ ~ ~ •••••••••. ~~ ~ ~ rn cn -i D N WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 411 EAST SHORE DR ~ ••• ••• i ~ ~ ~ O DUNEDIN FL 34696 \ ~ ;• 6j ; y ~ 2 ~ ••. ~ =• y0 ~ J rn D PH. (727 766-5747 FAX (727) 766-7479 PROPOSED SETBACKS ~; N y O ' : NJ~rn a * ~ ei r~ N 2' ~ = oo°o REVISIONS ; 9 C ~ ~ ~y' ^~ ~ ~ w w o TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 ~ ~~•.~~ ~ • •.~ ~ p ~' w ° WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT ~ i~.••.. ~ X ....••' ~ S ~ ~ ~ < ~'rn WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT 5 ' ' 77 ~ * / ~ \ 9 MHW +0. MLW -1.28 ~ i ~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 50' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) L1l u a ~ ~~16 Z ~ $ R N ~ ° ~ r~ r r I j ~ ~ ~ I I ~~.:~. I I I © .~ti~12 I lam// ~ I ~' I I © Z O t2 ~ I W I ,. I ~ ,, I Z WIJ ~~ I 1 © : I ~ . ~ ~ _,.~ _ ~.::~-~.v~k X1 0 WIC I ~ O la I I APPROXIMATE DEPTH I I I Q ,o I CONTOURS 10 ~ (REFERENCED TO MEAN 'off , ` ~ wo i LOW WATER) ~JC/ oar i I ® O c~ I I ^ 1 ~. ~ a,3= .. I I I I ~ O a e~ W ~ ~'-_ IZ a la- W j J ~ ~ ~J t g- ~ QI ~ ~- F (~ ~ `, ~~ W I ~ si I ~ I W ~ >` c~ !Cl a I Wl~r- 6 T 94 ~ , ~ IIII~ ~ ~ f1 •:1:• : :' . Li~ /'~ ~ ; ; .; SEAWALL ' :{ I 6 ~ ~: I I ,~~~~ I I ~- : ' I I SEAGRASS BEDS I 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:22am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 6 ENGINEER'S SEAL ``~1111~''' ` * ''/ .`` R ~ .••••••••• ~ , ~ rn ~, ~ ~ Div WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 411 EAST SHORE DR ~ •• '•• ~ ~, ;•• ••• G~ ~' ~ ^~ ~ O ~~ ~,~ v DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. (7275 766-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 BENTHIC DATA WITH = ` ~ . ^~ y C ~ = N N ~ JJ APPROXIMATE WATER DEPTHS : - ~: a _ s ~ m * ~ _; ~ = ~D W ~o~ REVISIONS (REFERENCED TO MEAN LOW WATER) ~ y - :~90 ~ ~G; ~ ~ ~'. ~ ! ^ o000 ~ w n o p ~ w ° TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT , • ~ ~ ~'••...•.••'~• ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~/ J < a'rn WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT 59' 28' +0 -1 ~ ~ / /~ * `\ . . MHW MLW ~ i i ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 10' COMMERCIAL DOCKS Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) 42" HANDRAIL (TYP.) a FIXED DOCK f E;CISTING SEAWALL H1=1GHT = ±4.1 FT :~~ N~aVD88 -FINISHED ~ MMNELEV=+ossFT FLOATING DOCK S1=AWALL HEIGHT MLWEIEV=-7?8 FT ................ ........ MATCH FINAL GRAD ~ ~~ BAY BOTTOM O F LOT SEAGRA (RIOT A1INIMUM 8 FT PILE UNDER DOCK) PENETRATION SEE SHEET 4 FOR CROSS SECTION A-A' LOCATION BAY BOTTOM Sa , 14 Nov 2009 - 922am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST ShIORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg S HEET 7 ENGINEER'S SEAL MUNICIPALITY ,~ ~~, ~`""''' 411 EAST SH®RE DR * , ~~ ~ ••••••••e•• ~~ j ~ ~ D N ~ • - ~ WOCIDS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SURE 22 O •• •• ~ ~' " .•• ••. ~~ r-~ y • DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. (7275 786-574, BENTHIC DATA WITH y : ~ ~~rnD ; ~y Z ~ FAX c727> 786-7479 APPROXIMATE WATER DEPTHS a m * N =~ ~ = oo~o REVISIONS (REFERENCED TO MEAN LOW WATER) ~.90 dp ~: ~ ~ u, ~ °y a • ~ ~ ~' ^ ~ cJO ~ ~' a TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT • ~.• o- ~ • • • •• ~ ~- ~ WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT 28' 59' -1 +0 ~ V . . MHW MLW ~ i ~ ~ ~ i i i i `~ ~ ~~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 10' COMMERCIAL DOCKS Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) BAY BOTTOM A' MHW ELEV =+0.59 FT MLW ELEV =-1.28 FT SEE SHEET 4 FOR CROSS SECTION A-A' LOCATION BAY BOTTOM Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:23am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 8 ENGINEER'S SEAL MUNICIPALITY \\`""'''~' ` X11 EAST SH®RE DR ~ ~ ,P'~, rn~ ~ .••••••••, ~~ j T ~ D N ~ •' •• i ~ ~ ~° O WOC)DS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SURE 22 FL 34698 DUNEDIN ~ ~• • • •~~ D . 5747 PH 727 786 CROSS SECTION A - A CONT . , ~ . ( ) - . `G~ N ~ ~ • ~ y Z ~'- ~ ~ D FAX (727) 766-7479 . N • A a C n~ - JJ- rn * i N = ~ = oo°o o m REVISIONS .~ . 9Q OD ~~. ~ iu ~' n a o ~ ~ TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 ~~' ~ c ~ ~.~~~f o _ ~' o ~ ~ WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT i ~ ••.,~~~•~,..•' ~ ~ < i~ ~Cj~„ ~ ~ ~^' WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT MHW +0.59' MLW -1.28' ~/ ~ ` `\ ' i i ~ ~ i I I i ~ \ \ \~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) It is the intent of the following construction details to be a reference guide for quality, structural and safety standards. All structures to meet local, and or state guidelines for aquatic and marine construction. GENERAL DOCK NOTES: ° ° 1. ALL DECKING TO BE TRIMMED, BO I H SIDES. ° 2. ALL PILINGS TO BE SEATED WITH A FREE FALLING HAMMER IF WATER JETTING IS INSTALLATION METHOD. ALL PILES TO BE TRIMMED SAME ELECTRIC CONDUIT HEIGHT. PVC WATER LINE 3. PILING CENTER TO CENTER SPACING ON ALL FIXED DOCKS TO BE 10' NOMINAL. AND NOT TO EXCEED 12'. 4. DOCK FRAMING AND DECKING TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS (SCREWS TO BE TYPE SPECIFIC FOR MATERIAL UTILIZED). UTILITY SECTION VIEW 5. WOOD DECK BOARD SPACING AT TIME OF INSTALLATION NOT TO EXCEED 1/8" TO ALLOW FOR CURING, COMPOSITE DECK SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 114". ALL DOCK FRAMING OTHER THAN DECKING TO BE MINIMUM GRADE 2 DECK SCREW PATTERN 6 . LUMBER. DOUBLE STRINGERS INTERMEDIATE STRINGERS 7. RASP OR FEATHER ALL SAWCUTS. 8. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO MEET OR EXCEED COUNTY REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN ° SECTIONS 166-(332, 333, & 334) OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY WATER AND ° NAVIGATION CONTROL AUTHORITY REGULATIONS MANUAL. ° 9. CCA WOOD NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR DECKING OR RAILING MATERIALS. WOOD ° TREATMENT AS FOLLOWS ARE ACCEPTABLE: ALKALINE COPPER ° ° QUATERNARY (ACQ), IF ACQ TREATMENT IS UTILIZED, THEN THE WOOD NEEDS TO BE SEALED WITH AN ENGINEER-APPROVED SEALANT. oNESCREwINTOEACFI 10. IF A MAIN DOCK SUPPORT PILING FALLS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY (LESS THAN 2 FEET) TO A BOLLARD PILING REQUIRED FOR A FINGER PIER, THE BOLLARD PILING MAY BE USED FOR BOTH PURPOSES PROVIDING THE CENTER TO INTERMEDIATE STRINGER CENTER SPANS OF THE DOCK SUPPORT PILINGS DO NOT EXCEED 12 FEET. LAP JOINT 11.5/8" GALVANIZED FASTENERS ARE NOT TO BE USED IN WOOD WITH COPPER Ik~l (NTS) Ik~l AZOLE TREATMENT 12. PILES TO BE WRAPPED FROM THE MUD (SILT) LINE TO 2.0' ABOVE THE MEAN DOUBLE STRINGERSMIN. ' OVERLAP HIGH WATER LINE (MHWL). WITH PRIME HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE 30 MILS 4 OR .030" THICK INTERMEDIATE STRINGER 13. ALL WOOD PLANKING WHICH IS TO BE OVER AN AREA OF SEAGRASS, MIN.2'OVERLAP IF PRESENT, SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 8" WIDE AND HAVE A MINIMUM SPACING OF NO LESS THAN 1/2" APART AFTER SHRINKAGE. ,z' MAX. O.C. (~ G 10' NOMINAL SPACIN 14. PILINGS TO BE INSTALLED IN AREAS CONTAINING SEAGRASS, IF PRESENT, TO BE INSTALLED BY JETTING WITH A 3" PUMP REDUCED TO A 1- 4" (JET PIPE), AUGERING AND DRIVING. SHOULD ANY ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT OCCUR AT THE BASE OF THE PILING, IT IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE GRASS AREA. Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:23am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 9 ENGINEER'S SEAL ~~111111/~~/ ,, * ~~ ~- WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR , , ~ .[1~•••••••••. ~~ i -n ~ n N 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SURE 22 ~ ,~JJ'r' ••_ '• i rn 7° O ~;•• '•; ~ ~r,n DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. (727) 788-5747 PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS `6j~ ~ y Z ~ :~ ~ v N rn D FAX (727) 766-7479 JJ~ O ~ D ~ej • - ~• a ~ - a ~ N ? ~ = oo°o r-' REVISIONS ; ~O ~ ~`;~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ a ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 1 300 FT y •.• ~: w ~ o ~ . WATERWAY WIDTH ± ~ ~ '••...•....•' _~~` ~ ~ < - "' WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT ,~ *' \~ a' MHW +0.59' MLW -1.28' ~~ i i ~ I I I I ~ ~ ~~~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) NOTE: IF COMPOSITE DECKING IS USED. O.C. STRINGED SPACING TO BE VIA MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS, NOT TO EXCEED 24" O.C. EITHER 5/4"X6" SAWN BRAZILIAN HARDWOOD, 2" X 6" PT, OR COMPOSITE DECKING HANDRAIL (WHERE APPLICABLE) STANCHIONS PLACED 5.0' O.C. 2" X 10" INTERMEDIATE ' XX 6" 2 STRINGER MAX. 2.0' ~ ~ O.C. CCA .60 RET. NOTE: IF COMPOSITE IS USED, STRINGERS TO 2" X 4" BE 16" O.C. MAX /~ ~~~ 'T 2" X 6„ STANCHIONS COUNTERSINK ALL BOLTS RAILING TO BE FASTENED TO STRINGERS ADJACENT TO BOAT SLIPS. o W/ SHORT BOLT, AND FASTENED TO PILE WITH LONGER BOLT WHEN AVAILABLE 0 0 ALL BOLTING TO BE 5/8" HOT ° o DIPPED GALVANIZED MIN, 3/4" ° ° DOUBLE STRINGER 2" X 10" WITH OG WASHERS BACKING 22 DEG MIN #2 S4S CCA .60 RET. BOLT AND NUTS ° 45 DEG MAX 0 STAINLESS STEEL RECOMMENDED ,( 0 0 MINIMUM PILE BENT BRACING: ° ° 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA * DEPTHS 8 TO 16 FT. .60 RET. ONE EACH SIDE 2" X 10" #2 S4S ALL PILE BENTS TO BE CCA 2.5 RET. ALL PILE CAPS & CROSS CROSS BRACED WITH BLOCKING BRACING TO BE DOUBLE 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. BOLTED AS SPECIFIED ONE SIDE ONLY NOTE: * DEPTHS >16 FT ALL CCA TREATED PILES TO BE VINYL CROSS BRACING IN SHORT & WRAPPED FROM MUD (SILT) LINE TO 2.0' LONG DIRECTION REQUIRED WITH MIN 8" TIP PILING 2.5 C.C.A. RET. ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE (MHW) 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. SET BUTT DOWN, MIN 8.0' PENETRATION. WITH PRIME HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE ONE SIDE ONLY .040 THICK. NOTE: DECK BOARDS TO BE TRIMMED BOTH SIDES. TYPICAL MAIN WALKOUT NOTE: ALL INTERMEDIATE STRINGERS TO BE LAP JOINTED AT BENTS 2.0' MIN. NOTE: ALL WOOD PLANKING OVER SEAGRASS, TO BE NO MORE THAN 8" WIDE AND HAVE A MINIMUM SPACING OF112"APART AFTER SHRINKAGE. Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:24am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD1411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 1 ~ ENGINEER'S SEAL \~~111111/// ~ ~ .••••••••• ~~ i ~ ~ D nNi • • WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1. SUITE 22 411 EAST SHORE DR ~ ••• •• i ~ ~ ~ O ` . •y ~ ,n y DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. (727 786-5747 PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS ~ I `G :• ~ y Z ~•~ v v rn D N ~' FAX (727) 786-7479 7U~ ~ _ N 0 ~ * N 2' ~ = oo°o ; O ~ REVISIONS A. 90 4D y ~ ~ ~' ~ D o • • ~ • TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 ^ ~ o ~ w ° i •••.~ •~ ~ WATERWAY WIDTH 11.300 FT ~ ~~•••••••.•••• ~~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT ' ' /~ * ~ ~ \ MLW -1.28 MHW +0.59 ~~/ / / I I I I ~ ~~~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# ir+rr~nin~ i ~1+r non v~ w, (ivu~~ vv~ v~r~.~ ~ LENGTH ~-2~" SCHD 40 RIBBED GUSSET 4 ROD PIPE •A• lr s' WIDTH 2X3TUBE ° 5' E CHANNEL ~~~ I ~ z s ' J ~ 'A' ALUMINUM DECKING 2 X 2 X 3/16 TUBES TYP 42" 21' HANDICAP RAMP LENGTH GANGWAY PROFILE SCALE: }'=1'-0` 2~' SCHD 40 PIPE RUB RAIL 2 X 2 X 3/16 TUBES 42• 21" 60' 1 ALUMINUM DECKING 2 X 3 TUBES 5' E CHANNEL Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:25am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 11 ENGINEER'S SEAL \\~\11111 .~ * ~~~ r- ~ ~~ ~ WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR ' ~ , ~ ••.•••••••••• i -n -~ D rNV ~ •• •e / ~ r" 70 O • • r 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 5; •. ~~ D ~ PH. (727 786-5747 PROPOSED DOC K DETAILS `Gj i 1 y `~ 7 ~ ~~ ~ J :I rn y ~ FAX (727) 786-7479 y ~ ^ 0 - . _ • NN/~-I ~J D . a * "i - ZI N o m ~~ =~ ~ _ o00o REVISIONS ~ Q : 9~ ~ ~~,:' ^~ ~ ~ ~ w a TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 • •.• •.• ~ O _ w~ WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT ~ ~ •'•••••* •'~~ ~ rn ___ WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT / ~~ TTT ~\ MHW *o.ss~ MLW -t.za' ~ ~ i I I I i \ \ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # ^ 1V1'f Il~l/1L IIJC VIVL 1 ) LENGTH 8-~" DECKING 2'- 6" 5' ~" GAP BETWEEN 5' 2'- 6" EACH PIEC E 5, g" ---------------------------- -------------------------------- ~ --------------------------------------- 1 1 I ~ , ' 4' 1 1 :"!I ~ TH i I 1 4' ~~ 2"x8" WOOD 2"x2" 8" "E" ~"g" 4" CHANNEL FENDERING TUBE CHANNEL CROSS- (SEE SECTION, STRINGER (TYP) MEMBER TYP) (TYP) (TYP) WIDTH g8" 4" CHANNEL ALUMINUM CROSS MEMBER DECKING (TYP) 2"x8" PT WOOD BUMPER (TYP) g" "E" POLY- 2"x2" TUBE CHANNEL FLOAT LONGITUDINAL SIDE (TYP) MEMBER (TYP) B - B' Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 926am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD1411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 12 ENGINEER'S SEAL \\\~~tlllll * )))// ~ ~- WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR ,~ , ~..••••••.• ~ , ~I -i D N ~ .•• ••• ~ ~ ~ ~ O • 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 \ ;• ~ •; ~ ,n PH. (727 766-5747 PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS = ` : ~ y Z = : ~ v v rn D FAX (727) 766-7479 • ^ y ,~ ~ ~ Iv J~rn ~ ~ a - „D -- o ~ REVISIONS ~: o m N - W~ =s ~ - op~o G y 9 ~ ~ \ ~ w v a ~ ;' ^ TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 ••.• ~ •.~ ~ o ~' w ° ~ WATERWAY WIDTH (1,300 FT % ~'•••••••• ••~C~~ ~ rn ~ WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT ~ ' / * /) 1 ~ ~ ~\ MHW +o.ss MLW -1.26 )1) I I I I t ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCK . Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Prime High Density Polyethylene Specifications for Pile Wrapping Material TYPICAL ASTM TEST PRGPERTY VALUE METHOD Melt Index 190°C/2.16 g/10 min 0.25 - 0.35 D 1238 Density g/cc 0.955 D 1505 Tensile Strength @ Yield psi 4000 D 638 Elongation % > 600 D 538 Cold Crack Temperature (-76°C) D 746 Flexural Modulus psi 200M D 790 Environmental Stress Cracking F90h 45 D 1693 Underwriter Laboratory flammability rating: 94HB Complies with FDA Regulation 21 CFR 177.1520 NOTE: TOP ELEVATION CANNOT BE GREATER THAN 10' ABOVE MEAN NOTE: ALL CCA TREATED PILES TO BE VINYL HIGH WATER WRAPPED FROM MUD (SILT) LINE TO 2.0' ELEVATION ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE (MHW) WITH PRIME HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE 30 MILS OR .030" THICK ~ 2.0 FT ° ° MHW LINE ° ° ° ° VINYL WRAPPING ° FROM MUD LINE ° TO 2.0' ABOVE MHW ° ° C.C.A. 2.5 RET. PILE MUD LINE (Bottom) Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:26am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 13 ENGINEER'S SEAL \\\illl-~ii ~ r- .~~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~ ~ \ ••.•••'•••••• ~~ i ~ -~ D N • • i ~ o WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 411 EAST SHORE DR ~ • • ~ ~ • •• - DUNEDIN FL 34698 c,:• ; ~ ,~ y • 1 ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ v J rn y PH. (727) 796-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 VINYL PILE WRAPPING DETAILS ` ~ ~ ~ _ N N 70 -1 D ' ~ JJ i - ZI a y - : ~ * ~ ?: ~ o°o REVISIONS t r n . o • Cq: GJ o p •9~ ~ Oj; ^~ ~ ~wwo TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 '4~ ~•••• • ••.• ~ o ~ w~ ~ ~' ••••••'• ~~ A rn WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT ~ ~ `~ * ~ ~ 59' +0 1 28' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ i i I I i \ \ \~\ . . MHW MLW - ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 30' . COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) I I I 0 0 0 o I ~ ~Z ~ a WSJ Z ~ I I pl} e e I Wj~ IW Hla W W~_J IO I I Q.' la Zip I o 0 0 0 I xis I I ~ l I a I I I I I I I I I I I I 42" I ~ ° o HANDRAILS 42" HANDR~ILS I I I I I I ' I "CAUTION I I I ' I I I SEAGRASS" ~ ; : :• I I SIGN •.,.• : ; : I , ; ; I I I I I I QUANTITY:3 ., ••'•• ••I I I I I I I I ~~ I I "NO MOORING" SIGNS, QUANTITY: 5 LANDWARD-FACING "FLORIDA FRIENDLY BOATING" SIGN (REPLACES MANATEE BASICS FOR BOATERS) QUANTITY: 1 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:29am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD1411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 14 ENGINEER'S SEAL ~\1111111 .~\ * ~~~ // rn WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR , ~ •••••••••••••. ~ •.• ~ , ~ ••• ~~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ••. ~ ;n 1714 C UN D NR~ 34698 fTE 22 PH. (727 786-5747 PROPOSED SIGNAGE AND `: ^~ y C ~~: = J v ~ ~ FAX (727) 786-7479 HAN DRAT L LOCATI ONS a * ~ REVISIONS r' : p ~1 N ~C ~ Z~ oo°o Gl' ^~ ~ ~ ~~., ~ o TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 ~ ••. •.•• ~ o ~' w ° WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT • ~ ~~f~.••••.•.•••• ~ / • ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~~ }'rn WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT 0 59' ' * // ~ / ~ ~\ . MLW -1.28 MHW + ~~ / 1 1 1 1 1 1\\ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 60' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Nd ~ k FLOATING TURBI DITY Z ~ CURTAINS (USE SMALLEST AREA PRACTICABLE) ' WATER LEVEL CONNECTING RODS I FLOAT ~ I I j "_ - ; ~ ~ I SEA LAMINATED I ~ FLOOR VINYL-POLYESTER I I 12~~ MI FABRIC ~ ~ o I I I ; G I I CHAIN WEIGHTED ' ~ TYPICAL FLOATING TURBIDITY CURTAINS (DESIGN BY AER-FLO INC.) I I I I ~ I I NOT TO SCALE ~ I I I .., I I I I iw I I QI Z J I w ~ Z pl } } I I ~IJ F Z wl ~ Gi~ Xi a wig wi ~ Xla i0 is w a, ~ I I I I ~:~~~: f: '~ I I I I I I 11 EAST SHORE DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:30am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 15 ENGINEER'S SEAL ~ \`'\"III'''' 411 EAST SHORE DR * , WOODS CONSULTING ~ •.••••••.• ~ •• • ••• ~ ~ -n -iD N • i rn ~ O ~ ~rDO '•• 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH (7275 786-5747 TURBIDITY CONTROL y~ `~ • 1 y `~ 9 . ~ ~ ~ J J rn = ~i D , FAX (727) 766-7479 i ^ a ~ N ~~ - Jvl~rn * ~ ~ ~ REVISIONS N -_ 't0 m ?' = oo o ° C S•'9O ~ ~' ~ n a ~ ;• ~ J w ~ TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 ~ •.• ••: . a ~' w ~ WATERWAY WIDTH 11.300 FT ~ ~i~••...•....•• ~ ~ ~ ~ m< ~ ~ a'rn WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT 59' 26' +0 -1 * ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~\ . . MHW MLW ~ i i I , I , , ~ \ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 50' COMMERCIAL DOCK . Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) All unattached pilings identified on Sheet 17 shall f4 Z # ° ~ be painted with a durable white coating on the ~ ~ upper four (4) feet thereof and wrapped with OUTERMOST TIE POLES TO BE ~ ~ white reflective tape cf at least ~,~~o (2) inches in WRAPPED WITH REFLEOTIVE width and one foot from the top so that the same TAPE I shall be visible for three hundred sixty (360) W i ~ degrees. c z J °W - `' W Z F}- O W ~ It shall be the duty of all owners and tenants of ~ w ° x n properties with such pilings or w o W ~ permitted structures to maintain the same in a Ea ` ~ ,n safe condition and to ensure that the same are kept marked and reflectorized as herein provided. ; I I ° ° I I I ° WHITE COATING °^ I I I i :. _ ~ " .. ..:. :_~ I I 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE FOR TOP 4 FT AND o< i CLEARWATER, FL ° REFLECTIVE TAPE <° 1 FT FROM THE TOP °o ° ° ° MHW LINE C.C.A. 2.5 RET. PILE MUD LINE Bottom) NOT TO SCALE Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:30am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 16 ENGINEER'S SEAL \~\-Illiiii~ ,~\ ~ 77 rn WOODS CONSULTIN G 411 EAST SHORE DR , ,t, , ~ ~ .••••'••••• ~ i ~ ~ D iv ~ .•• ••• i ~ ^~ ~ O • r 1714 COUNN ROAD 1, SURE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 ;• •. D~ ~ ; PH. (727 786-5747 FAX 727 786 7479 TURBIDITY CONTROL ` j ~ y Z ~ _ ~ ~ v J rn D ( ) - / ~ • ~ O ~J \.~ ~ TD ~ a ~ * ~ 2; ~ _ ~~,o~ ~ REVISIONS o - oo 9C ~ ~G:' ^~ ~ ~~,, ~ o ~ ~ TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 .•' ~ paw ° '•. ~, ~ ~'••••...•••~~~ ~ rn WATERWAY WIDTH ±1,300 FT WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT ' ~ / i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~\ MHW +o.s9 MLW -1.2a ~ i i i I I 1 \ \ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 30' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) 0 0 LEGEND M 0 0 t M # ~` . O Z ~ Q FIRE HOSE STATION ~ EX FIRE EXTINGUISHER (4ACOBC) IN FIBERGLASS CABINET (BY OTHERS) / ~ HOSE BIBS CONNECTION ( ~ \ \ ~r - - - POTABLE WATER ~~..~J FIRE MAIN HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE o (HEAT FUMED) PER ASTM F-714 r FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ~~~~ ' POINT OF CONNECTION . _ I.I. ~ - ~ (1)-2" POTABLE LINE ~ ... W/2" TRU-UNION BALL VALVE BY SITE - _ .,_ CONTRACTOR - - • ~%~ 3" HDPE (FIRE DRY) UNDER GROUND MIN. 30" BURIAL .... ~..,. __ _ - -~ aulua e ~ - - - ~ M.9 - - ~ FDC - - _ - -- ---~uipae ~'- - - - _ - - - _ FIRE HYDRANT - - - ~ - - - - - ~u!VeleM ~9l - - - - - _ _ ..._ - __-(EXISTING) ewVaJeM--b - - -- - Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:11am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 18 ENGINEER'S SEAL \`'\tIIITT~''/ ~ - ~ ~ ~ WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR ~ r \ R ~ ~•••••••. ~ ~ T ~ D ro '~ ~' 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 ` ••• ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~.• .. •. D ~ 6 ~• v DUNEDIN FL 34696 PH. (727 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 FIRE & WAT E R P LA N ` j~ ~ y = : ~ v rn D N ~ / 1 A O • _ N D ~ J~ i - T o * _: ~ o REVISIONS ~ _ po p m e~ ~ 'D O ~ y' ~ ~ w ~ °n a TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 ~ '~1 ••• •.• \ p ~' w ° WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT • • ~ ~~{~.•••••••.••• ~~ ~ rn ~? ~ ~' ~ WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT ~ ~ * / ~~ i~ ' ~` MHW +o.ss MLW -t2a ~ ~ r - I I I i \ \ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 20' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) ~~ t '. P;. +. ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~, EX 0 o O o ~ 1`;~; N i' I 1: ~ .~ 3" HDPE (FIRE-DRY) I'r 1~-_ ~ 2" HDPE (POTABLE) P~' O O Y' O O (~- M {` ': M x- >~ F N EX 0 FL EX CONNECTION r 3" HDPE (FIRE-DRY) 2" HDPE (POTABLE) :ti ,_~ - LEGEND f``a .Y Q FIRE HOSE STATION v„ I[;: - \~ EX FIRE EXTINGUISHER (4ACOBC) IN ~ ~•. FIBERGLASS CABINET (BY OTHERS) i, ,: -; : , 1 a HOSE BIBB CONNECTION f - - ~ ~ n ~ - - - POTABLE WATER ~ l = ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ' FIRE MAIN _ 1Y~ HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE '~. ~}~- (HEAT FUMED) PER ASTM F-714 ,~, _~- .. _. --~ . I Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:33am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 19 ENGINEER'S SEAL ``\ ~ I I I ~'''~ ~ ~` * /7 WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR \ ~ ~ ~ ••••••••••• ~ i ~ •.•• •••• ~ . rn cn -n -i D N ~ ~ ~ O ~~ 7714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SURE DUNEDIN FL 34698 ) 22 ~ . 5 ,. Cq : ~ y 2 ~ :• D ~ J v rn D PH. (727 766-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 FIRE & WAT E R PLAN ` `: ^ O -: NN~1 ~ ~ * o~ : ~ ?~ ~ . m ~ • wo REVISIONS y • - ~O'~~ ~ ~~ • ~ ^ ~ •• ooAO v ~~„ ~ a ~ w TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 300 FT WATERWAY WIDTH ±1 ~ •• .• 1 ~ •• ° o . ~ i~.••......••• ~ ~ ~ < rn WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT ~~7 FR * ~~ ~~ ~ ` ~ MHW +0.59' MLW -1.26' ~ ~ ~ i ~ I I (\ \ ~ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 20' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) a Z ~ N ° - r EX r r r ~- ~; r F 3. F :.~ ~ 1' 1 - K t~' ~ _ - M - N w r EX 3" HDPE (FIRE-DRY) 1 I I N 2" HDPE (POTABLE) r, 0 0 ,~ , o 0 M 1 N I I' 1 r ~ . ( I N I t ~`' O EX r- 0 o I:; o 0 uy l l~ I;: C7 t. ram ter. r, .. ~ 'Y3r ,-k b ~~. ~. ~.,.. . CID i~ ' 3" HDPE (FIRE-DRY) LEGEND ~' ' 2" HDPE (POTABLE) ~( Q FIRE HOSE STATION O O O O EX FIRE EXTINGUISHER (4ACOBC) IN FIBERGLASS CABINET (BY OTHERS) ~'~j ~ `, HOSE BIBB CONNECTION I - - - POTABLE WATER ~; FIRE MAIN HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HEAT FUMED) PER ASTM F-714 '1r~,~-t «` f~: ~'~ry` `~ _ - Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:34am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 20 ENGINEER'S SEAL •\\''\1 *, R /~ rn WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR , , ~ ••••••••.. ~ i ~ ••• ••• N T ~ D N ~ ~ O 1714 COUNTY ROAD i, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 •• • ~ ~ ~ •• •• ~ ~~,.: ~ y t c•; ~ y n _ N N ~ ~ PH. (727 786-5747 FAX (727, 766-7479 FIRE & WAT E R P LA N g' ~ a ° ~ D JJ : - a~ =3 ~ o m * ~- -n = W~S~ REVISIONS • N - 1'S ' ~ - oo~o '.9~ ~ ~ ,%' ^~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ o TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 ~ . •.• •.• ~ O _ w ° WATERWAY WIDTH ±1.300 FT ~ ••••••••••••~~~~ ~ / ~ Arn WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT +o 5s' t 26' , * ~ ~~ ~\ . . MHW MLW - ~ ~) I I I (\ \ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 20' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) i r- ~ ... I `~ f ,,I~ ii ;: _._:~ . I FIRE HOSE VALVE ~j _ f. t P -t<~ .~.._.,. ~_ __._. _.. __._..,..._.... __._ . ~. k 1 i i ~ , 2-1/2" FIRE DEPARTMENT 3" HDPE (FIRE) coNNECTION ATTACH TO WOOD 2" HDPE (POTABLE) BUMPER W/STAINLESS '' .~: >.~; - - TM' ATTACH TO WOOD s° WHITE SCHD 40 PVC PIPE ; ': FILL WITH CONCRETE STEEL HARDWARE, 4' BUMPER W/STAINLESS OC STEEL HARDWARE, 4' 3" BRASS ADAPTER OC SIGN TO READ "DRY FIRE TYPICAL ALUMINUM F LOAT SECTION STANDPIPE DOCKS" (NTS) GRADE LEVEL '. CONCRETE 'f•~ • P': .' 3" SDR II HDPE PIPE 36" MIN BURIAL ~ V FIRE DEPT CONNECTION (NTS) Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:35am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 21 ENGINEER'S SEAL \~\1111~t~~/ ~ WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR ~ •.•••••••.• ~ i ~ •••• •••• ~~ ,. .. • ~ ~ ~ D N ~ ~ ~ O , ~-, 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. (727 786-5747 FIRE & WAT E R P LA N - ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~y O ~ J v rn y N FAX (727) 766-7479 ~ : R ~' ~1-{ N J~ n • - ~ * ~ ~D REVISIONS DETAILS . :O ~ en =' • y y oo~o °o 9O ~ I~ % • ~ •' ~ ~ ' ^ ~ ~"' 1' v v ~ w ° TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 1 300 FT •. •.• _A % ~ ••'••••••••••~" ~~ p ~ rn , WATERWAY WIDTH ± WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT / * ~ ~~ ~ \ MHW +0.59' MLW -1.2a' ~~ i i I I I i t ~~~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 20' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) STAINLESS STEEL 3.1/7 % 31? % 1!4' STAINLESS STEEL THROUGH OLT 3/B" %31/2" HEX CAP AND FLAT WASHER 316 6TAINLE$$ 6 EL BARB ADAPTER C ~ STAINLESS STEEL ADAPTER TRIPLE BAND WITH 316 STAINLESS STEEL 9MDING 1.1/7 WIFE 14 GA 3165TAINLE56 31656 STRAP STEEL GROVED COUPLING TYPICAL RAMP ANCHOR DETAIL (NTS) 6EAWALL FI%ED DOCK ~ AYRAMP GANGWAY RAMAP ________________________ ___ __ __________________ _____-WATER LINE FLOATING DOCK 7 OIA TERCEL SANIVAC 2-0 HOSE -POTABLE STAINLESS STEEL 7' HDPE (POTABLE) ' 3"DIA TE%CEL FLO-3 HD-FIRE HANGER (TYP.) OR EQUIVALENT g7TACH WITH 1/4" WITH S.S. ADAPTERS 6TAINLESS BOLT AS WITH 4" DISCHARGE HOSE FOR CHAFE NEEDED PROTECTION - TEX-POLY 8-40 TYPICAL (2) ENDS FLEX DETAIL (NTS) WALER (TYP.) HOSE BIBB W/BACKFLOW PREVENTER ~2-112" HOSE VALVE 6" DIA STAINLESS STEEL TUBE ~j 2" SDR II HDPE PIPE rWALER (TYP.) 2"SDR II HDPE PIPE (POTABLE) FLOATING DOCK WELD TO STAINLESS 1 / FLOATING DOCK ATTACH TO BOTTOM OF WALER wi Ss STRAP, 4' oc STEEL PLATE \ STAINLESS STREEL STRUT (2) REQUIRED 2"X3/4"ALPRINE SADDLE O 3"SDR 11 HOPE POPE (FIRE) W/ 14 WITH ss BoLrs (TVP.) ~ WATER G/A/S/S/STRAP & 5/16"X2" S.S. LINE = WATER LINE LAG SCREWS 4' O.C. DISTANCE VARIES WATER FEEDER LINE 3/4" DIA SCHD 80 PVC ATTACH TO BOTTOM OF WALER DEPENDING ON WHALER W/ 55 STRAP 4' OC WIDTH AND DOCK , 3"SDR II HDPE LINE " FREEBOARD 7M DIA SCH 60 PVC ATTACH TO BOTTOM OF WALER SINGLE CANTILEVER (CL) FLOATING DOCK W/BS BTRAP, 4'OC HOSE VALVE TYPICAL CONCRETE FLOAT CROSS SECTION (NTS) (PERSPECTIVE-NTS) Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:36am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 22 ENGINEER'S SEAL `''III (('''~ ` \ ~ '/ WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR \~ ~ rnLn ~ ~ ~ ••••••••.• ~ D Iv i 1714 COUNTY ROAD i, SUITE 22 ~ ~ ••• ••• i rn ~ O .• •• ~ ; DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH (727 786-5747 ~ , G . (, : ~ . FAX 727 786 7479 FIRE & WAT E R P LA N ` ~ . ~ y Z ~ • v v rn D ' ( ) - ^ y ~ - N J~rn DETAILS ~ * ' Q m N ? ~ _ o00o REVISIONS • I G ~ ~~ ~ ~ /~ ;.• ~ ~ ~ (~,, ~ o TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 ~ ~••••~ .•' ^ ~ p ~ w ~ WATERWAY WIDTH ±1,300 FT • ~ ~ ••••.....•••• S~ ~ ~ < ~ fir" ~ ~ ~~ WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT 5 ' ' * ~~ / ~ \ 9 MHW +D. MLW -1.28 ~ ~ ~ i (III (\ \ ~ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 20' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) _ a ~: >. _ ... £. ! ~\ i ~ ~~ t ~ ~ . i -{ ~. ~! E .: i ~.,.. , ti'IINIi~ItSIs1 PIL>w ~ImN E v <t;-., r. ....... ., ....... .: , ,. ~ , ` r ! r X ~, fil..l. ~''ll..r tsI"hT .' ~~::. i= '- - _ ', `. . _. !."t?irrJs [=fit.. 1-~.; i ~(-i r? _ '. Ali 1 j . ,... ~ .. .. .. .. ice. ~ n : _ z r 3 HDPE (FIRE) 3__.. ~__ __~ - ATTACH TO WOOD 2" HDPE (POTABLE) BUMPER W/STAINLESS ATTACH TO WOOD STEEL HARDWARE, 4' BUMPER W/STAINLESS ,: OC STEEL HARDWARE, 4' OC Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:37am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 23 ENGINEER'S SEAL .~\'\.. .. *'~ ~ rn WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR \ • • ; ,, \ •••• •••• C ~ •. ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ n 1714 C UNEDINROFLD 34698 RE 22 PH. 727 786-5747 ~ ' ~ y Z ~ : FAX (727) 786-7479 FIRE & WAT E R P LA N ` ; ~ : N N ~ ~ •" n ~: = Jv DETAILS ~ y p ~ * ;~- REVISIONS n i w 2 = s G oo~o '. ~ C ~ ~ :' ~ ~ ~••• ~ ~ ••• ^ ~ ~ w °n a o A w ° TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 300 FT WATERWAY WIDTH ±1 ~ •. % ~ ••'••••••'••JC ~ ~ ~rn . WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT / ~ ~ ~ ~ 5s' 28' MHW +o -1 ~ i ~ ~ \ . . MLW ~~ i i I I I i\\ ~~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SCALE: 1" = 100' COMMERCIAL DOCK Application# nrrwin~ i Inc inn v~ 220 z ~ ~-.. ~ I '~ 411 EAST HORE i I SUBMERG DLOT 1 (2.29 AC OR 9 ,680 SF) I col i .~ 1520 I 1 0' O.O O.O O O I ~ ~ 0 ® © • I © ~ ~ © LO_ I O ~ © O ._ ® O © O l1 + 178 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL (0.39 AC OR 17,061 SF) Sat, 14 Nov 2009 - 9:38am P:\411 East Shore (401-07)\CAD\411 EAST SHORE REDESIGN 11-11-09 CITY final rev.dwg SHEET 24 ENGINEER'S SEAL \\~1-III1T~~// ,~ ~ ~ rn WOODS CONSULTING 411 EAST SHORE DR , ,~, , ~ ~•••••••••• ~ i ~ AA ••• '•• ~ - • ~ ~ ~ D iv ~ ~ O 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 ~ ~ 7,.• •. ~ y i 1 y Z ~ ~• ~ Dn J J rn y PH. (727 786-5747 FAX (727) 766-7479 SUBMERGED LOT DIMENSIONS ` _ ~ 9n O : ~ A _ ~ ~'J70rn y1 ~ • ~ r ~ ~ ~ 2 . ~ oo°o ° REVISIONS ~.~0 ~ A ' ~ ~ ?• ^ • ~ ~ ~ v o ~ w TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,000 •. ei 1 •• ~ ~ • ~ ~ • p A w ~ WATERWAY WIDTH ±1,300 FT •••••••••• ~ ~ ~ ~ A rn WATERFRONT WIDTH 178 FT +o 5s~ ~ / , * 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~\ . MLW -1.2a MHW i T ~ I I i ~ ~ ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Peter Marks , Mana er of ECP Pro ert Holdin s, LLC _ 107 Moore St. _ Princeton, NJ._ 08540 (609) 497-9640 ~ FAx IvuMBER: ~~_--~ ~-.--~~---.. ------- EMAIL: peter_allington_marks@yahoo.com 411 East. LLC. Trevor Howard 4805 Inde endence P -Suite 2506 Tam a, FL. 33634 727-490-1784 FAx NUMBER: 727-490-1787 EMAIL: Trevor@howardcivi 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. The architectural theme of the site is typically Key West style. There is only a small 16' x 16 ft marina office proposed on the site. The site will be adequately landscaped with fhe type of vegetation typically found in Florida and Key West. This includes oak and magnolia frees as well as a variety of shrubs and ground cover. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. IIDESIGN21ProjectslEndeavor Capital Partners1411 East Shore DrivelApplicationslECP 411 Comp Land App 2009-11-12.doc Page 1 of 2 2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearvvater. The neighboring properties have virtually no landscaping. This property will be the only one on the block with adequate landscaping. This added landscaping will enhance the community character by making the area more pleasing to the eye as landsca in icall does. 3. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The landscape added to the site will make the site visibly more appealing which will encourage potential visitors to the neighborhood businesses. This higher rate of visitation will strengthen the business acfivity fo the site whereby making the property more probtable. 4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The proposed landscaping will enhance the scenic corridor along East Shore Drive by heavily landscaping all open areas on site and will meet the landsc~e design requirements of the Marina and Beach by Design District. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS /ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City. representatives to visit and photograph the property escribed in this application. Signature property owner or represe tative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF ~ - SG'C~Yo~ S r~ to and sy~bscribed before me this day of /OV~e-~'~-h._e.~' , A.D. 20c~ to me and/or by who is personally known has produced 2cye.t~S LtCe>.FP - Irt (~30-Ycr(-(may-cr~~~'-C3 as identificati~ ~,J p F~,r_ ~; Notary publjtt My commi ion expires: ,,~s'~; JAN GO.DFARB •: , Y" , ~.: MY COMMISSfON It DD 746774 ~~ ~ " ~~` so~~aPmmErsio~ January 6, 2012 f„t~~ tary PuWIC Undenvdteis IIDESIGN21ProjectslEndeavor Capital Partners1411 East Shore DrivelApplicationslECP 411 Comp Land App 2009-11-12.doc Page 2 of 2 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE 2na Submittal For Revised Layout SUBMITTED TO: City of Clearweater Southwest Florida Water Management District HOWARD CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC 4805 Independence Parkway, Ste 2506 Tampa FL 33634 813-341-0496 . ; ,: , Trevor D. Howard.JP,.E:'`~ .. 5364'= Novemt~er 1~, ~'a09 '' ; Proiect Narrative PROJECT LOCATION The project is located on the east side of East Shore Drive, between the inter coastal waterway and East Shore Drive. The address is 411 East Shore Drive in the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. Section 08, Township 295, Range 15E. PROJECT SIZE The project size is 0.39 Acres. EXISTING CONDITIONS There was previously a hotel and service facilities on the site resulting in a lazge amount of impervious surface area. From recent aerial photos the site appeazs to be mostly impervious. The site has recently been cleazed of all buildings and parking azeas and is currently vacant. From soil borings conducted in the azea of the proposed retention pond, the Seasonal High Water Table is estimated to be 3 feet below existing grade. PROPOSED CONDITIONS The owner of the site wishes to construct a 11,834 squaze foot parking azea with the a 256 squaze foot dock masters office. The project will also have the associated stormwater facilities to serve it. The impervious azea of the site is being significantly reduced by the proposed improvements. A stormwater retention pond will collect all runoff from the improved areas. This retention pond will treat the water quality volume for the site before dischazging stormwater into receiving water bodies. DESIGN CRITEREA City of Clearwater The pre-developed impervious azea of the site is approximately 85% (from recent aerial photos). Due to the redevelopment criteria the runoff cooefficient is % of the predeveloped resulting in a curve number of approximately 0.40 This difference in volume between the pre and post developed runoff rates will be retained in the retention pond. Dischazge is also directly to a tidally influenced water body and generally attenuation of the pre and post developed dischazge rates is not necessary. SWFWNID The water quality volume of the first 3/4 -inch of runoff from the project area will be collected and treated via effluent filtration in the retention pond. Discharge is directly to a tidally influenced water body/. An extra 50% of water quality volume will be held in the retention pond due to discharge to an Outstanding Florida Water. Due to the fact that the post developed directly connected impervious area is being reduced, there is a net reduction in nitrogen and phosphorous in the stormwater discharge. Conclusion The proposed stormwater management facility will meet the stormwater requirements of the SWFWMD, and the City of Clearwater. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: 411 East Shore Drive November 13, 2009 PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS RUNOFF AREA AREA COEFFICIENT PRODUCT LAND USE (ac) (sf) "C" C x A PERVIOUS 0.070 3,049 0.20 0.014 IMPERVIOUS 0.320 13,939 0.95 0.304 0.48 0.152 TOTAL 0.390 16,988 0.318 0.166 "C" WEIGHTED AVERAGE = 0.82 "C" WEIGHTED AVERAGE = 0.43 TIME OF CONCENTRATION= 60 MINUTES 10 MINUTES calculated with 50% "C" value for city's storage requirements calculated with 50% "C" value for city's storage requirements calculated with 50% "C" value for city's storage requirements Used for city's storage requirements Used to establish peak runoff rate EXISTING RUNOFF COEFFICENT = 0.82 RAINFALL INTENSITY= 3.6 IN/HR (25yr storm - 60 min. T.O.C.) Used for city's storage requirements RAINFALL INTENSITY= 8.4 IN/HR (25yr storm - 10 min. T.O.C.) Used to establish peak runoff rate CONTRIBUTING AREA = 0.39 ACRES PEAK RUNOFF RATE= C x I x A = 0.82 x 8.4 IN/HR x 0.39 AC PEAK RUNOFF RATE= 2.67 CFS STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: 411 East Shore Drive November 13, 2009 POST-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS RUNOFF AREA AREA COEFFICIENT PRODUCT LAND USE (ac) (sf) "C" C x A IMPERVIOUS 0.270 11,761 0.95 0.257 PERVIOUS 0.093 4,051 0.20 0.019 POND 0.027 1,176 1.00 0.027 TOTAL 0.390 16,988 0.302 "C" WEIGHTED AVERAGE = 0.77 CONCENTRATION TIME = 60 minutes TREATMENT DEPTH = 0.75 inch TREATMENT VOLUME =CONTRIBUTING AREA x TREATMENT DEPTH = 16,988 sq. ft. x 0.8 inches = 1,061.78 cubic feet 0.520 cubic ac-ft STORAGE VOLUME = dQ=dCIA x Time of Concentration dC= 0.35 dQ= 1,763.86 cubic feet 0.0405 acre feet STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: 411 East Shore Drive November 12, 2009 Stage -Storage Calculations Elevation ft NGVD Area s ft Area acres Incremental Volume ac-ft Cumulative Volume ac-ft 3.00 762 0.017 0.000 4.00 1116 0.026 0.022 0.022 5.00 1516 0.035 0.030 0.052 CONTRIBUTING AREA (ac) 0.390 DEPTH OWB OF (in) 0.75 TREATMENT WATER (cu-ft) 1,062 QUALITY VOLUME ac-ft 0.024 WATER QUALITY (ft) 4.09 ELEVATION 25-YR WATER (cu-ft) 1,764 QUANTITY VOLUME ac-ft 0.040 25-YR WATER QUANTITY (ft) 4.63 ELEVATION Weir Sizing Calculations The weir crest can be sized using the equation Q = C x L x (H''5) where Q =flow rate = 2.67 CFS C =weir coefficient = 3.2 H =depth of flow over weir = 0.53 FT L =weir length (ft) Q= CxLxH1'5 2.67 = 3.20 x L x (0.53^1.5 ) L = 2.14 FT UNDERDRAIN CALCULATIONS Car~stant Filter Area Thin Blue Numbers = In ut data I~~ B~IdRet~~l~~+mber~ ~..~,gosyvers ~1` ~2' Mirs.`' Site Data Project area = ° 0:39' acres R _ ' 'x,09 ft. -Elevation of the top of water quality treatment. volume Rainfall runoff depth = 0.75 inches (OFW ?) B _ -'3.00 ft. -Elevation of the bottom of the treatment volume or the pond Required treatment volume = 1 062 cubic feet C = ~ 2.20 ft. '- Underdrain''irnert elevation Underdrain pipe tength (Lp) _ ' 16.0 feet " 035 ft. -Distance from bottom (B) to the centerline of the underdrain Underdrain pipe diameter = 6 inches H = "1.50 ft: =trench height- Manning's n = ` 0-010. 5:42 Darcy's k (ft/hr} Total bleeddown time = - - 15.$3 hours Area of pond at elevation A = ' 1 222 square feet pond Volume okay? - Yes Area of pond at eleva{ion B = 762 square feet .Recovery time okay? - Yes Average'~pond surface area AR = ' 1 222 square feet Underdrain pipe size okay? f Yas Filter Ftow Length {L) _ ' ° 2.d0 feet- flow length through the filter media (2' minimum). Underdrain invert elevation okay? `u -Ygs WATER ELEV. '(FT.) TOT. HEAD (h) {FT.) ..INCR. HEAD _ (FT-) DER. VOL. {V) (CU.FT.) INCR. VOL. (CU.FT.) FILTER' FLOW LENGTH (FT} ;, HYD. GRAD. i = h/L .FILTER AREA ; AF Lp x H' FLOW Q=kiAF (CFH) AVG: FLOW (Q +p2)/2 (CFH) INCR.' TIME (MRS) TOTAL TIME (HRS) 4:09 ' 1.64 1,071 2.00 0.$200 24 107 0.18 211 101 2.10 2':10 3.91 1.46 ' 860 2.00 0:7292 24 95 0.18 198 89 2.23 4.33 3.73 1.28 ' 662 2.00 0.6383 24 83 0:18 185 77 2:40 6.73 3:55 1:10 477 2.00 ' 0.5475 24 71 0.18 172 65 2.64 9.37 3.36 0.91 ' 304 2:00 0'4567 24 59 ' 0.18 159 ' '' 53 2.97 12:34 3.1$ 0:73 145 2.00 0.3558 24 48 0.18 145 42 3.49 15.83 3.00 0.55 0 2.00 0.2750 24 36 ~HC~WA-RD e C[VlL ENGINEERING Soil Boring Test for 411 East Shore Drive To determine depth to Seasonal High Water Table and Approximate Infiltration Rate of Soil Trevor D. Howard, P.E. Florida P.E. No. 59364 Howard C-vil Engineering, LLC 4805 Independence Parkway, Ste 2508 Tampa, FL 33634 Office (813) 341-0496 (Fax) 727-490-1787 www.HowaMCivilEngineering.com Howard Civil Engineering, LLC visited the site on 08/09/09 and performed a soil boring by hand auger in the area of the proposed retention pond to determine the depth to the seasonal high water table and the infiltration rate of the soil at the proposed bottom of the pond. The test location is shown on the attached site plan as well as a boring log and other attachments and exhibits. The National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) map shows the predominant soils in the area as Urban Land and consists of mostly beach sand that was placed on the site as fill. A soil boring test was conducted in the area of the retention pond. The boring was terminated at a depth of approximately 6 feet below the ground surface. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 4.0 feet below the ground surface. The elevation of the seasonal high ground water is known to fluctuate during wet and dry periods. Given the information in the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) map and by observing other stormwater retention ponds inclose proximity to the site as well as the drainage facilities in the area, it is estimated that the seasonal high groundwater table is about 40 inches below the existing ground surface. This would indicate the SHWT would be found at approximately EI 2.0 ft. The elevation of the MHWL is 0.59 ft A double ring infiltration test was conducted approximately 2 feet below the existing ground surface. This is a depth consistent with the expected bottom of the proposed retention pond. Two open cylinders were placed in the soil with one ring placed inside the other. The rings were partially filled with water. The water was maintained at a constant level by adding water to the inner ring. This volume added is a measure of the water that permeates the soil over a specific time period and gives a velocity of the infiltration. This is usually expressed in inches per hour or feet per day. The results of the double ring infiltration test show a permeability of approximately 9 inches per hour. This purpose of this report was only to determine the depth of the seasonal high water table and the infiltration rate of the soil. No other warranties are expressed by this investigation such as the possibility of sink hole development or the existence of caverns or cavities in the underlying strata. Howard Civil Ergineering, LLC 48051ndependence Parkway, Ste 2508 Tampa, FL 33634 011iae (813) 341-0496 (Fax) 727-490-1787 www.HowardCivilEngirteering.cam Hand Auger Boring Log Drainage Area Studies 411 East Shore Drive Client: Peter Marks City of Clearwater Date: 08/09/09 Technician: Trevor Howard Elev. Elev. Remarks Ft. Ft. SP-SM 0 -1 Water table found (4 ft) SP 2-5 End of boring (6 ft) PRaECT No.: 411 East Shore Drive ~e HOWARD CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC D•B•~ Clearwater cH.: I• Land Development Civil Engineers DWG: 4805 Independence Pkwy, Ste 250B, Tampa, FL 3363 DATE: BORING LOG Phone: 813341-0496 Fax: (727) 490-1787 SITE DATA ~ PROPERTY INFO: I I PARCEL NUMBER: 08/2 9/1 5 /0 25 921003/00 70 SUBMERGED LAND: 2.29 ACRES (99,680 S.F.) I UPLAND AREA: 0.39 ACRES (17,061 S.F.) `1 ZONING: T -TOURIST I PROPERTY USE: EXISTING: HOTEL THEN VACANT I PROPOSED: MARINA -PARKING LOT BUILDING HEIGHT: I I EXISTING: 0 FEET I PROPOSED: 12.67 FEET FLOOD ZONE: FEMA PANEL 12103C 0102G I DATED SEPT. 3, 2003 ZONE: AE-11 I STRUCTURE SETBACKS: I REQUIRED EXISTING R0 FRONT (EAST SHORE DR) 15 FT. 0 FT. 5.00 FT.I ~ REAR (CLEARWATER HARBOR) 10-20 FT. 0 FT. 0 FT 10 FT 86.44 FT. ' 87 FT 147 I . . SIDE (NORTH) SIDE (SOUTH) 10 FT. 0 FT. . . 10.00 FT+ :~ I ~ PROPOSED BUILDING: I DOCK MASTER BUILDING: 320 S.F. GROSS FLOOR AREA FLOOR AREA RATIO: ~ I ALLOWED: 0.85 EXISITNG: 0.00 ~ w I PROPOSED: 0.02 ~ ~ v3 .r IMPERVIOUS AREA RATIO: ~ ALLOWED: 0.85 w - ~ EXISTING: 0.00 PROPOSED: 0.69 s.. I PARKING: MARINA: 1 SPACE PER 2 SLIPS = 16 SPACES (31 SLIPS/2=15.5) PARKING LOT: 16 SPACES - ~ '~ r TOTAL : 32 SPACES I PROPOSED 32 SPACES (INCLUDES 2 HANDICAP SPACES) ! ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ PROPOSED AREA BREAKDOWN: i~ ~, AREA (S. F.) `k OF SITE zoc~a*E-~ VEHICLE USE AREA 10,517 61 .6~ W"" ""'~_`'"`"` PEP FD 1 BUILDING COVERAGE 256 1.5`-k ~~ +~'.:, EAOHS ""` OPEN GREEN SPACE 5,227 30.6 SIDEWALK 1,061 6.2~ gl l~o~u®c~ 4 4om~u~it Do~+tPO~it • gYx:M TO WlbiB89 ~II~IP 70.82'(MJ pl ~I • 9 WFFEP MFA WF.• ~• ~ 0' 30' SCALE: 1" = 30' N W E S ~~l` 1, 1 1J 1'~ ~ 1~ STORM 1~n 11 WATER 11 POND wog-:m 8oT.300 1 ~LL = hI ~ /~ H ~mF 11, 1 i~ !1 u ~~ 1J P~ I ~sa~T PARI(1M1G ~: aAH,~N~ svticts ~1 ~~ i ~1 I! i~ L _... . 11 1 ~ ~ 1 li ~~ ' (^ -- G O DOCK DESIGN AND PERMITTING BV WOODS CONSULTING U M J rcoi J NMnm 0) lJL r Z c n ~i ~ ~m~ WLV~cu W = m C Z U N ~ r LL Z C ~ v W ~ `n m ~ n J a ~~ U U O ~ ~ c a ~ n ~ J ~ t 0 ~ 0_ ~'. W > Q 0 ~ LL W O W g~Q ~Q~ ~ W //_~/~ r U VJ ~} OFFICE, I crnanrrg TOTAL COVERAGE 17,061 700.0 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS I AREA REQUIRED = 12% OF VUA = 0.12 X 10,517 = 1,262 SF AREA PROVIDED = 1,324 SF OR 12.6% qb '~ R\ J • `TMSH PEGEP I I 7M ',w'.F~ r ... w ... . ... ... ... M ~ izzssY~) Nes°se~i~wlMl To wpm Z GOON®(~ ~ ~ 0 ~'~~um884 DB~4ufc~4 U 0 CV W . C) H O a op U 0 ~ D ~ o n D r m 1 II W Q ~~ o~im ~ a~ DIY 88°a~ - ~~~~ yi... I~ 3o- ~ J ~~ ~~ ~~ ~/ ~ '•~ ® ll ~ t '°I a ~ ~ ~~ 1 a ~ _ _- S '' i t =,~ y 1,~. \. ~~ ~y; ~ ~r :g _ 1,.... ilb ~~~_~ f J I ~ .i%`~ g ~~ ~ 1 ~ A , ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~~~~. ~~ ~i ~ .'I • n r ~y a yl ~j~l ~ ~ ~ ~~ }j'JI l a • ~ -` a y 1' ~ ~'~`~ u~ . d~ ~~~ ~-~ b- t ~' a° q ~=-~'~,a'r~os°~/ ~ ~ 3 viz ~ ~~~ ~Zm cam "~ ~mz m °gz 41 1 °° k N .~_I~~~~ V% % fn`9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t W ~~~ ~1~~~ PRO~ECTrvo.: LANDSCAPE PLAN (REDUCED) ~ ° HOWARD CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC f k D.B.: cH.: 411 EAST SHORE DRIVE Land Development Civil Engineers DwG: CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 4805 Independence Pkwy.- Suite 2508 Tampa, FL. 33634 .. ~«:.~~ Phone: (727) 490-1784 Fax: (727) 490-1787 DATE: 2009-11-13 ,STOP OF fII70F NOR~I~ 51p~ TOP OF ROOF ----------------- Q'•8' AFF. e -- j 6'•4' AFf. 12 ~5 METAL ROOFING ~~_. ~' BAFW~IA5T11EPUJ.-DOYN --_-_ __ - MErAI.51ur~ ----- --- ~ PA18 90ARD _.~r---- ~~ _--- ~, W~RDI BD SIDM~6 '~;c:~~il~c: e?~'~'9i~atfir34 ~c~.;tii~"8ny .. ..... ~'.t ~:y,. FNEiFI GRADE 1~5~ 51p~ GRADE 501~1'~! 51p~ ~ ~ ~~~ 1 r01'~~ ---------------- O'•6' AFf. 8 f. DF8 +bIDO' b'-4' AFF. --- LI O A/b IPJH ~5 FETAL ROORNS --9,4W~t115MERLL-DOYN _~ hETA15HRfCitS `> '~ ' ~ ;. HIVtDI BD 51DN6 ~~ GRADE ~AS~ 51p~ TOP OFRDOF ------------- ---- -------------- ----- O'•8' AFF. h1 '~5 METAL ROOFING --- • r , ~. s'-o F~ , ~. . -- -_ _ - BFE~N00' ~N ~=_`~ ~ ~' _ -I -- _ _ - b'-4' AFP. - -- ~~~ --- ~ EAHMtA 5ME FUl-DOYN ~-! MErA15Hmtit5 1-----1 ------ IWmI ED 5DIN5 FN FLOOR '`iOP~~ ------------------- a'•e~ a~F ------------------ ~5 i~lS5 BEARMs 2',O. 9FE ~ IIID®' ON: 6~,4{b-- ~F --- FN ;® i®`. NARDI ED 51DIN6 .. .,~,. ; n _ _ ... FNISFI GRADE NOR~N 51D~ STOP GFGf ROOF ------------------ ------------------- t2'-8" AFF. 12 ~5 FM FLOOR 0'-0" ' f ~ -1-~ I ~ ' ~.~: 3N GRADE U~S~ 51D~ top of RooF ~,45~' S1D~ nroP of ~~oF ------------------- ------------------- B'•8' AFF. ~~5 iR133 BEARWG _ _ 8'-4' AFF. BFE+IIIDm' ___ 6'•4" AFF. 50U~'N SIDS - hE'tAL ROOFINS ~---- - BA}b1MA 5ME FULL-DOYN FETAL 5MUffERS - HARDI ED SIDING