The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2008-12033 - 619 Gulfview Blvd S - Shephard's Beach ResortFLD2008-12033 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 285A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED : 12/01 /2008 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: Good Afternoon, I will be sending the Staff report to these documents on Thursday, November 12, 2009 before SPM. Thank you, Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning and Development Department 727-562-4582 FLD2008-12033 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 285A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 12/01/2008 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC CDB: CLW CoverSheet CDB Meeting Date: Case Numbers: Agenda Item: Owner/Applicant: Representative: Address: November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 (Related to DVA2008-00002) D.4. (Related to E.3.) William M. Shephard, Trustee Alex Azan, Keith Zayac & Associates 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit the redevelopment of an existing 96-unit overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District to a 186-unit overnight accommodation use with a lot area of 2.37 acres (zoned T District), a lot width of 243 feet along S. Gulfview Blvd. (north), a front (north) setback of 15 feet (to existing building), 11.2 feet (to proposed building), 6.5 feet (to proposed sidewalk) and 6.79 feet (to proposed pavement), a side (east) setback of 9.58 feet (to existing waverunner accessory building) and 15.44 feet (to proposed building and decking), a side (west) setback of zero feet (to existing building, pavement and decking), a rear (south) setback of 22 feet (to existing building), 59.25 feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to existing/proposed patio decking), a building height of 134 feet (to top of roof deck) and a total of 384 parking spaces (self- park and valet in existing garage; valet-only in new garage), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (2) Increase of the permitted density by the allocation of 68 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH) BEACH BY DESIGN CHARACTER South Beach/ClearwaterPas DISTRICT: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: 96-room hotel/motel Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 1 of 13 Proposed Use: Overnight accommodation use of a total of 186 rooms (78.48 rooms/acre on lot acreage zoned Tourist (T) District, including the allocation of 68 units from the Hotel Density Reserve) and approximately 37,647 square feet of accessory uses to the hotel at a height of 134 feet (to flat roof deck) EXISTING SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: North:Tourist (T) District South:Preservation (P) District East: Tourist (T) District West: Tourist (T) District Automobile Service Station and Attached dwellings Gulf of Mexico Overnight accommodations Overnight accommodations e~vnT.vcic• Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.689 total acres (2.37 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.319 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation) located on the south side of S. Gulfview Boulevard approximately 600 feet east of Hamden Drive. The site is comprised of two parcels. The subject property is currently developed with a 96-unit hotel/motel. There is approximately 16,224 square feet of accessory uses. An automobile service station and attached dwellings exists to the north of the subject property. The Holiday Inn hotel is located to the west and the Econo Lodge hotel is located to the east of the site. The Gulf of Mexico is located to the south. In 2005, an application was filed to redevelop this property as a mixed-use for 111 overnight accommodation rooms and two dwelling units under Case No. FLD2005-11108. Part of this proposal included the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) from four sending sites for five dwelling units and 10 overnight accommodation units (Case No. TDR2005-11028). This proposal never proceeded past an incomplete status and eventually was withdrawn. However, the five dwelling units were actually transferred by recorded warranty deeds to this site without City authorization. Development Proposal: The proposal is for the redevelopment of the existing 96-unit overnight accommodation use to a 186-unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 78.48 units/acre on the lot acreage zoned Tourist (T) District, which includes the allocation of 68 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design. This is the fifth hotel to be placed on the Community Development Board agenda since the amendment of Beach by Design in July 2008 creating the Hotel Density Reserve as a means to encourage the construction of new mid-size hotels on the beach in response to the loss of hotel rooms since 2002. Also on this CDB agenda is a companion Development Agreement (DVA2008-00002) that must be approved by City Council, which provides for the allocation of the 68 units from the Hotel Density Reserve. This Development Agreement provides for mandatory evacuation closure of the hotel in the event of the posting of a Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 2 of 13 hurricane watch including Clearwater Beach by the National Humcane Center, which also complies with Beach by Design criteria. This proposal complies with the Beach by Design criteria to access all rooms through a lobby and internal corridors. The proposal is to redevelop the property by demolishing basically the eastern portion of the existing improvements. The existing parking garage, restaurant, nightclub and 46 hotel rooms will be retained in the existing buildings on the western portion of the site. The proposal includes the construction of a new building on the east side of the property with 140 hotel rooms at a height of 134 feet (to the top of the flat roof deck). A colonnade will connect the existing building to the new building with a water wall feature on the south side of the colonnade. Anew pool is proposed south of this colonnade. North of this colonnade is proposed adrop-off/pick- up porte cochere that can stack 16 vehicles. This new entrance area will provide access to the existing parking garage, as well as providing access to the parking garage in the new building. The hotel registration desk located in the building to be demolished will be relocated to the lobby of the western building being retained. The first floor of the proposed building will provide guest entrance area to the elevators and storage rooms, as well as a total of 16 parking spaces. Level 200, 300 and 400 will provide a total of 47, 49 and 52 parking spaces respectively. Level 500 will provide a total of 18,498 square feet of multi-function and meeting room space for guests. Levels 600 through 1200 will provide 20 hotel rooms per floor. Level 1400 provides a spa and exercise area, as well as a rooftop pool. Covered areas on this rooftop area comply with Code provisions for maximum building height due to the rooftop occupancy afforded. Hotel rooms are primarily oriented with east and west views, but the balconies provide views of the Gulf of Mexico. The new building is described as a seaside beach motel design, which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this waterfront property. Railings on the balconies of the new building will match that of the existing building so that there is continuity of design elements. The main exterior color of the existing and proposed buildings is white. Windows and glass doors in the new building are planned with a blue tint. Beach by Design provisions require no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. The proposed building facade-has been designed in compliance with this requirement so that this maximum 100-foot dimension is not exceeded. The proposed parking garage levels (Ground through Level 400) will be clad with a decorative metal mesh screening panel system for screening views of the vehicles. At least on the north side of the new building for Levels 200 through Level 500 a landscaped facade is planned with a greenscreen trellis system. The existing parking garage will also be enhanced with the same decorative metal mesh screening panel system for screening views of the vehicles. At least the existing parking garage is planned to be planted with climbing vines that will assist with screening of the vehicles. In order to ensure the landscaping material on the metal mesh screening panels on the existing or proposed parking garages are not trimmed to create any signage, a condition of approval to prevent such is recommended, unless such signage is approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program. There are four cabanas planned poolside as part of the ground floor of the new building. To ensure that the cabanas on the ground floor are used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines for velocity Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 3 of 13 zones, a condition of approval is recommended to be included in any approval of this request. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in deed restrictions or like forms, will need to be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. During the final DRC review, it was noted that a large 26-foot wide by 16-foot high overhead door was introduced at the northeast corner of the proposed building. Staff questioned the size, location and purpose of this overhead door. The owner's response was that the size of this overhead door was to provide for beach maintenance equipment. Such equipment is not presently on-site and the applicant has not provided any documentation to Staff regarding such equipment. This proposed overhead door is also located at the base of the ramp that provides access to and from the upper parking levels, where critical turning movements occur enter and exiting the garage. Additionally, the location of the overhead door is at the farthest point of the building from the beach area, where any such tractor would damage the landscaping, and possibly the stormwater system, along this side of the site. Finally, the applicant has not indicated where such beach equipment would be stored in the building, which may displace parking spaces. The applicant has not justified the introduction of this large overhead door. As such, Staff would recommend that such overhead door be eliminated, or relocated closer to the beach area to minimize such damage and be reduced to a size not to exceed 12 feet in width and height. Parking spaces on the south side of the building can be removed to provide building access for this beach equipment. Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per acre. Based on the 2.37 acres zoned Tourist District, a maximum of 118 overnight accommodation units are permissible under current regulations. The proposal also requests 68 hotel rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve, adopted as an amendment to Beach by Design under Ordinance 7925-08. The overall density for this project is 78.48 overnight accommodation units/rooms per acre, which meets and is less than the maximum established in Beach by Design for projects that have acquired units from the Hotel Density Reserve. Based on recent Code amendments for hotels and related to the Hotel Density Reserve, when the percentage of accessory uses exceed 15 percent of the hotel gross floor area, the accessory uses must be treated as primary uses for calculation of density/intensity. Based on the proposed overall hotel gross floor area of 188,725 square feet and a total of 37,647 square feet of accessory uses, the accessory uses represent 19.94 percent of the overall hotel gross floor area. Staff has performed a mixed use calculation, where the accessory use square footage (37,647 square feet) is subtracted from the original lot area square footage zoned Tourist District (103,237 square feet) to produce a net lot acreage of 1.5057 acres for calculating allowable density. Based on the net lot acreage and 50 rooms/units per acre, the maximum base density is 75 rooms. Again, based on the net lot acreage and 150 rooms/units per acre, the maximum number of hotel rooms under the Hotel Density Reserve is 225 rooms. When the 75 rooms is subtracted from the 225 rooms, this equals 150 rooms. The maximum number of rooms available when the lot acreage is less than 2.5 acres is 100 rooms. Therefore, the maximum number of rooms complying with the Hotel Density Reserve provisions is 175 rooms (75 + 100). The proposal is for 186 rooms. Since this proposal was submitted prior to the Code amendments moderating hotel densities Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 4 of 13 based on the amount of accessory uses, upon construction of this hotel, this site will become a nonconforming use due to number of rooms. This determination does not prevent the allocation of the 68 rooms requested, or the approval of this application. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISRZ Pursuant to CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed I.S.R. is 0.83, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum lot area for overnight accommodations can range between 10,000 - 20,000 square feet. The overall existing site is 103,237 square feet of lot area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for overnight accommodations can range between 100 - 150 feet. The lot width along S. Gulfview Boulevard is approximately 389 feet. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum front setback for overnight accommodations can range between 0 - 15 feet, the minimum side setback can range between 0 - 10 feet and the minimum rear setback can range between 0 - 20 feet. The proposal includes reductions to the front (north) setback to 15 feet (to existing building), 11.2 feet (to proposed building), 6.5 feet (to proposed sidewalk) and 6.79 feet (to proposed pavement), to the side (east) setback to 9.58 feet (to existing waverunner accessory building) and 15.44 feet (to proposed building and decking), to the side (west) setback to zero feet (to existing building, pavement and decking) and to the rear (south) setback to 22 feet (to existing building), 59.25 feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to existing/proposed patio decking). The proposal includes retaining the existing development on the west side of the site, including 46 hotel rooms, the accessory uses of the restaurant and nightclub and the parking garage. The existing parking garage is located at a 15-foot front setback. The existing improvements along the west side at a zero-foot side setback were approved under a variance granted in 1998. These existing improvements, including a covered trash and equipment area, pavement to access loading/trash area and an outdoor patio for the nightclub, will be retained at their existing zero- foot setback under this proposal. This proposal includes trimming the existing carport-type structure on the west side so that it does not extend over the west property line. The existing building will retain its 22-foot rear setback, along with the zero-foot setback to the existing patio decking. The proposal includes retaining a portion of an existing building east of the restaurant, remodeling the ground floor for an expanded kitchen for the tiki deck, providing a snack bar oriented toward the proposed pool, removing the second floor enclosed area and turning this second floor to an open activity deck. The rear setback to the existing structure is approximately 26 feet to the south property line. The proposal basically reconstructs the eastern half of the property with new development. Revised driveways are proposed on S. Gulfview Boulevard, as well as a new drop-off porte cochere and a colonnade "connecting" the old and new buildings. Anew pool is proposed south of the entry colonnade. Since the new building will be constructed on the east side of the site, the proposal includes reductions to the front (north) setback to 11.2 feet (to proposed building), Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 5 of 13 6.5 feet (to proposed sidewalk) and 6.79 feet (to proposed pavement). Due to the angle of the front property line, the proposed front setback to the building is at the northeast corner of the building, as the setback increases toward the west. The 6.5-foot setback is to a sidewalk leading to a storage room on the east end of an exit stairwell. The site has been designed with a drive access from the entry area to the parking garage in the new building, with the edge of the pavement at 6.79 feet to the front property line. This setback, along with the landscaping proposed between the property line and this edge of pavement, will provide sufficient protection to pedestrians on the public sidewalk within the S. Gulfview Boulevard right-of--way. An existing waverunner accessory building is proposed to be retained, which is located at a side (east) setback of 9.58 feet. The proposed building and decking is proposed at a side (east) setback of 15.44 feet, which exceeds the minimum side setback requirement. The proposed building is located at a rear setback of 59.25 feet to the south property line. Staff notes. that the architectural design includes tapered fins on the front (north) and rear (south) sides of the new building. While the bottoms of the architectural fins at ground-level are closer to the building, the upper reaches of the fins are closer to the front property line and the seawall at the rear. Adjacent to S. Gulfview Boulevard, the top of the tapered fin is located approximately 19.83 feet from the front property line. At the rear, the Building Code requires an 18-foot setback to seawalls due to the deadmen. The top of the tapered fins are located approximately 11.67 feet to the seawall, which will require a variance to the Building Code seawall setback requirement. Maximum Building_Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the maximum allowable height for overnight accommodations can range between 35 - 100 feet. Section B.1 of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design allows the building height to be increased to a maximum of 150 feet for properties that obtain additional density from the Hotel Density Reserve for properties located between S. Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico. The proposed building is 134 feet in height from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the flat roof. This site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass character district of Beach by Design, which does not prescribe any maximum heights. This proposal complies with the maximum building height allowable under Beach by Design. There have been other projects approved at a maximum height of 150 feet within this same South Beach/Clearwater Pass character district between S. Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico. Minimum Off-Street Parkin: When this project was submitted for review, the minimum required parking for overnight accommodations was one parking space per room, or a minimum of 186 parking spaces. The existing parking garage contains 192 regular parking spaces and 28 overflow parking spaces during peak demand (total of 220 parking spaces). The existing garage will operate as self-park for hotel guests and as valet parking during peak demand. The overflow parking is by valet only. The proposal includes constructing afour-level parking garage as part of the new building, which will be by valet parking only, with a total of 124 regular parking spaces and 40 overflow parking spaces during peak demand (total of 164 parking spaces). Overall, this site will contain a total of 384 parking spaces (316 regular parking spaces and 68 overflow parking spaces). The proposal includes 2.06 parking spaces per room. CDC Table 2-803 has been amended to require 1.2 parking spaces per overnight accommodation room. At this new parking ratio, 223 parking spaces would be required. From an amenities Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 6 of 13 standpoint accessory to the hotel, based on current Code provisions, when the percentage of accessory uses exceed 15 percent of the overall hotel gross floor area, parking for all uses must be calculated separately. Based on the accessory uses being 19.94 percent, Staff has recalculated required parking to be 522 spaces. The proposal provides a total of 384 parking spaces. Since this proposal was submitted prior to some of the Code amendments moderating hotel densities and intensities based on the amount of accessory uses, upon construction of this hotel, this site will become a nonconforming use due to the number of parking spaces provided. This determination does not prevent the approval of this application. The existing site currently has three driveways. The westernmost driveway acts as an exit from the existing parking garage and provides access to the loading and trash area. This driveway will remain in its present condition. The existing center and easternmost driveways are close to each other in proximity to the existing parking garage. The proposal will retain the existing center driveway and provide greater separation to the easternmost driveway. All existing surface parking spaces will be removed. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible.. from public streets and/or abutting properties. There will be mechanical equipment located on top of the flat roof of the new building. The mechanical area will be screened by a metal louvered screening system in compliance with this requirement. Sight Visibilit~riangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the driveways on S. Gulfview Boulevard, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20- foot sight visibility triangles. Shrubbery planted within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this hotel will be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. Electric panels, boxes and meters are proposed to be located in an electrical room on the Leve1300 of the new building. Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this overall site. This proposal complies with the minimum five-foot wide building foundation landscaping along S. Gulfview Boulevard extending out to the front property line. The front area of the existing building on the west side is planted with shrubs (viburnam, philodendron and Croton), ground covers (confederate jasmine, grand lily and bird of paradise) and trees (coconut palm, Washington palm and sea grape). The proposal will enhance the existing parking garage building with Indian hawthorn and sea grape shrubs and trees (southern wax privet and cabbage palms). Some of this enhanced landscaping will help screen from view a lower area of the existing parking garage used for accessory bike, electric bike, moped and segway rentals. The redeveloped front areas for the new driveways and building will be landscaped with shrubs (variegated pittosporum, Indian hawthorn and ixora), confederate jasmine ground cover and palms (Washington and cabbage). Landscaping assists with softening and reducing building massing to Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 7 of 13 both pedestrians and motorists. The northern portion along the west side of the site adjacent to an exit driveway and loading area is presently planted with a hedge of oleanders and pittosporum shrubs. The east side of the site adjacent to 625 S. Gulfview Boulevard will be planted with a hedge of variegated pittosporum and seagrape shrubs and cabbage palms. The balance of this east side will be sodded. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize hotel housekeeping staff to remove trash from units and transport the trash to the existing dumpster location on the west side of the existing hotel building being retained. The existing location and its screening has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si~na~e: The site contains an existing freestanding sign that exceeds the,maximum sign height of the Code and is therefore nonconforming. As part of this proposal, this existing nonconforming sign will be required to be replaced with a new freestanding sign meeting current Code provisions. The proposal indicates this new freestanding sign located between the center and easternmost driveways. This freestanding sign should be designed as a monument-style sign, match the exterior materials and .color of the building and be a maximum height of four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program, in accordance with the flexibility criteria of .CDC Section 2-803.I.3. Attached signage must meet Code requirements, including the signage indicated as part of the water feature by the colonnade. Additional Beach by Design Guidelines:. Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is approximately 20,211 square feet. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 109 feet along S. Gulfview Boulevard and 199 feet deep (north to south), while the vertical plane is approximately 141 feet from grade to the top of the flat roof. None of these dimensions are equal. Modulation of the building massing also provides considerable dimensional variation. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. The proposed building facade has been designed in compliance with this requirement so that this maximum 100-foot dimension is not exceeded. The east and west sides of the lower levels (ground through Level 500), which is the parking and meeting room levels, has been designed with a linear dimension of no more than 40 feet for portions of the building. The north side of the lower levels (ground through Level 500) has been designed with a linear dimension of no more than 33 feet for one portion of the building. The south side of the lower levels (ground through Level 500) has been designed with a linear dimension of no more than 46 feet for a portion of the building. Starting with Level 600, the hotel tower tapers narrower east to west, with the entire building at Levels 600 - 1000 not exceeding 92 feet. At Levels 1100 - 1400, the building is further tapered to approximately 82 feet east to west. On the north to south direction for Levels 600 - 1400, the building has been designed with a linear dimension of no more than 84 feet for portions of the building. Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 8 of 13 Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows/openings or architectural decoration elements. The applicant has calculated the north elevation facing S. Gulfview Boulevard at 61 percent, the south elevation at 60 percent, the east elevation at 79 percent and the west elevation at 78 percent. Section C.4 provide that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelop located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. The applicant has calculated the overall proposed building mass between 45 - 100 feet at 12 percent of the total site zoned Tourist District. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use (hotel) with the standards as per CDC Tables 2- 801.1 and 2-803: Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent Density 50 units/rooms per acre 186 units/rooms XZ. (maximum of 118 units/rooms) (78.48 units/rooms per acre)' Im ervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.83 X . Minimum Lot Area 10,000 - 20,000 sq. ft. 103,237 sq. ft. (area zoned X Tourist District Minimum Lot Width 100 - 150 feet 389 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: 0 - 15 feet 15 feet (to existing building); Xz 11.2 feet (to proposed building); 6.5 feet (to proposed sidewalk); 6.79 fee (to ro osed avement) Side: 0 - 10 feet East: 9.58 feet (to existing Xz waverunner accessory building); 15.44 feet (to proposed building and decking) West: 0 feet (to existing building, pavement and deckin ) Rear 0 - 20 feet 22 feet (to existing XZ building); 59.25 feet (to proposed building); 0 feet (to existing/proposed patio deckin ) Maximum Hei ht 35 - 100 feet 134 feet (to flat roof) Xz Minimum One parking space per unit/room 384 parking spaces (2.06 XZ Off-Street Parkin (186 s aces) s aces er unit/room) ~ Includes 68 units/rooms nllocnted from the Horel Density Reserve pursuant to Bench 6y Design See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 9 of 13 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.C (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X' the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X' development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X' development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X' category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or a. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X' parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See analysis in Stnff Report Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 10 of 13 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X' adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X~ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X~ immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X' visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. See nnnlysis in Stnff Report SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of January 8, 2009, May 7, 2009, and October 1, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the foilowing findings of fact: 1. The 2.689 total acres (2.37 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.319 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation) located on the south side of S. Gulfview Boulevard approximately 600 feet east of Hamden Drive; 2. The site is comprised of two parcels; 3. The proposal is to construct a 186-unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 78.48 rooms/acre, which includes the allocation of 68 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design; 4. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2008-00002) that must be approved by City Council is also on this CDB agenda is, providing for the allocation of the 68 units from the Hotel Density Reserve; 5. The proposal includes retaining the existing parking garage, restaurant, nightclub and 46 hotel rooms in the existing buildings on the western portion of the site; 6. The proposal includes the construction of a new building on the east side of the property with 140 hotel rooms at a height of 134 feet (to the top of the flat roof deck) 7. This proposal complies with the maximum building height allowable under Beach by Design and with approved and existing buildings between S. Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico; Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 11 of 13 8. On-site parking will be increased through the construction of a garage in the new building with 164 total parking spaces, in addition to the 220 parking spaces in the existing parking garage, for a total of 384 parking spaces; 9. The proposal includes setback reductions from all property lines; 10. Since this proposal was submitted prior to the Code amendments moderating hotel densities based on the amount of accessory uses, upon construction of this hotel, this site will become a nonconforming use due to number of rooms; 11. Since this proposal was submitted prior to some of the Code amendments moderating hotel densities and intensities based on the amount of accessory uses, upon construction of this hotel, this site will become a nonconforming due to the number of parking spaces provided; and 12. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2- 803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Flexible Development application to permit the redevelopment of an existing 96-unit overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District to a 186-unit overnight accommodation use with a lot area of 2.37 acres (zoned T District), a lot width of 243 feet along S. Gulfview Blvd. (north), a front (north) setback of 15 feet (to existing building), 11.2 feet (to proposed building), 6.5 feet (to proposed sidewalk) and 6.79 feet (to proposed pavement), a side (east) setback of 9.58 feet (to existing waverunner accessory building) and 15.44 feet (to proposed building and decking), a side (west) setback of zero feet (to existing building, pavement and decking), a rear (south) setback of 22 feet (to existing building), 59.25 feet (to proposed building) and zero feet (to existing/proposed patio decking), a building height of 134 feet (to top of roof deck) and a total of 384 parking spaces (self- park and valet in existing garage; valet-only in new garage), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; and (2) Increase of the permitted density by the allocation of 68 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2008-00002); 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records. In addition, prior to the issuance of any permits, the owner shall request the Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 12 of 13 two existing parcels be combined into one parcel by the Pinellas County Property Appraisers office; 3. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 4. That the freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building and be a maximum height of four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program. All attached signage shall meet Code requirements, including the signage indicated as part of the water feature; 5. That landscaping material on the metal mesh screening panels on the existing or proposed parking garages be not trimmed to create any signage, unless such is approved through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 6. That, prior to the issuance. of any permit, the applicant demonstrate the proposed stormwater vaults drawdown in 24 hours or less based on a double ring infiltration test result; 7. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the overhead door presently proposed on the northeast side of the new building be eliminated, or relocated closer to the beach area and be reduced in size to not exceed 12 feet in width and height and the storage location of the beach equipment be indicated on all appropriate plans; 8. That the cabanas on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines for velocity zones. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy; 9. That, should the existing waverunner but be relocated to install the .drainage pipes in accordance with the submitted plans, this structure be brought into compliance with FEMA regulations; 10. That, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new building, the existing camort-type structure on the west side of the existing building be trimmed back to the west property line, with documentation provided to the Planning and Development Department; 11. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law; 12. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 13. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 14. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and the Fire Departments be addressed. Prepared by Planning and Development, ^De~partment Staff: V~ r Wayne .Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepnrtntentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cased Up for the nest CDBIGulfview S 06/ 9 Shepherds (T) 2009.Os - 1 /. /7.09 CDB - WWIGulfview S 0619 FLD Stnff Report.doc Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2008-12033 -Page 13 of 13 Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-562-4504 ~ Email: tiva~ne.wel(s~myclear~i°ater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ^ Planner III Planning and Development Department, City of Clearwater, FL November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; Reviewed building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). ^ Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director; Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). ^ Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Dept. of Planning and Development, Bradenton, FL June 1984 to March 1989 Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail. zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; Supervised six employees; Prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; Investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section -Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). ^ Planner I Alachua County Dept. ofPlanning and Development, Gainesville, FL June 1980 to June 1984 Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern -Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; Drafted ordinance revisions; General research. ^ Graduate Assistant University of Florida Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Gainesville, FL 1979 to 1981 Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; Coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. ^ Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Primarily prepared graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1'/2 years; Worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section SEC07~1D ST pR rr~tr~ = ~~ z ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ z ~ o cr 0 ~~ $RiGN7 WATER DR FlF77{ ST rn 2 6AYSIDE ~ ~R PROJECT SITE $A ~'~ Y S !"1 ~ 8L $[~ .~ ,> ~UCF~ -~~ ~ Ly a; -~ _ o s ~ ~ ~ V LOCATION MAP .Owner: William M. Shephard, Trustee Cases: FLD2008-12033 TDR2005-11028 DVA2008-00002 Site: 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard Property Size: 2.37 acres zoned "T" 0.319 acres zoned "OS/R" PINS: 17-29-15-05004-003-0010 Atlas Page: 232B 17-29-15-00000-220-0 l 00 Q h ' a A~ I` 445 2 2 z p ~ry 514 ~, scG~ '~L ~~ y^P ~ ~ ~` Q O ~O BA~AY BLVp T ~a Dry ~ h `$ ~ h O 561 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ry ~~ ~~ ~ h ~~' ~ ^O v n P ZONING MAP Owner: William M. Shephard, Trustee Cases: FLD2008-12033 TDR2005-11028 DVA2008-00002 Site: 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard Property Size: 2.37 acres zoned "T" 0.319 acres zoned "OS/R" PINS: 17-29-15-05004-003-0010 Atlas Page: 232B 17-29-15-00000-220-0 l 00 vex t' ~ L J ~~~ os In/~ y ~ A05 ~ = 4 > i i / 87 ~ ~ 9 / ~ / / X88 Q v~r0 ght i ~l~ d ~ on ,~ t,~ o a ~/ SEE S08-29.15 FOR PARCEL INFO o h°~ Attached ^ s Dwellings ~ C~ ~b 36565 / 4a `~~i -1 8925 L ~ 0 'F h ~` ~ 034 6 ~ 96j1q e~ `O ^l '°j~w , ed n~ o ` Overnight ~ ~ Bq ~ s~ A~ac e Accommodations h ~ Aut(p~~~Yo AYBC i!ip ~w '' a 1 rp 5 B FOR PARCEL INFO ~a , • ~~ 6° e~~Jp~117-291 FOR PA FO a / ~ ~ / ~ Sta ' n~ utddo~r / / ~ 'y s '' / / Ente~tai~ent 4 ~~ 5s 1 / / / z5o / ~ 5 / ~`O / / / / ~O / 24 ~3 ~~ ~ / g / 2 / / / / ~~ ~ ~~ ~ B 20 ~~ ~~ / 3 / / h I I ,~ ~,~ ~~t l ~o° a / / a ~ / s> / ~ I / 4 / / / 5 / / / Safes o / / 6 / / y / ~ / ~o / * SEE PLAT FOR DIMENSIONS Ve night / `Q /Ac ~diod~tion~s ,~ 9 ~ Attache / / io 1 / /~~ Dwelling / ~ 17865 ~ is ~ EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: William M. Shephard, Trustee Cases: FLD2008-12033 TDR2005-11028 DVA2008-00002 Site: 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard Property Size: 2.37 acres zoned "T" 0.319 acres zoned "OS/R". PINS: 17-29-15-05004-003-0010 Atlas Page: 2328 17-29-15-00000-220-0100 ~ l ~ E4. d ~:~ Rr: c ` ~ ~ , . y. "~ ~ .~-~~h~ o a ~ 7 ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~~ z z ` ~ ~ ~` t ~ /~ ~ ~ i •~ W, ~~~~ c ` /'8I ~ . 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~.. - _.~~ 4 r .~ ' t ~ ` ~ "`s f ~ lit ~ F ~ ~.. 1 n . J ,y. ' ~ ~ ~` ~ . rt, , R . - r-~ ^ ~ ~; ~a.Y ~ ~ t~ ~ t ~` r~ _ c'~ ' i ' . . =~ `'~ J ~ i ~~ ~ ' ~/: . ~ ~~ "f , -~ ^ AERIAL MAP Owner: William M. Shephard, Trustee Cases: FLD2008-12033 TDR2005-11028 DVA2008-00002 Site: 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard Property Size: 2.37 acres zoned "T" 0.319 acres zoned "OS/R" PINS: 17-29-15-05004-003-0010 Atlas Page: 2328 17-29-15-00000-220-0 l 00 View looking W along front of subject property along S. Gulfview Blvd. i ~_ z~ ~ S View looking E at rear of subject property (at seawall) with outdoor dining area 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard FLD2008-12033/DVA2008-00002 Page 1 of 3 View looking SW along S. Gulfview Blvd. at parking garage on sublect property ,._ _ , f View looking SW along S. Gulfview Blvd. at subject property View looking S along W side of property from S. Gulfview Blvd. at loading & trash area (Holiday Inn to the right) .. ' ,7~ View looking E at waverunner but at rear of subject property ~~ ~. ,. i• View looking N from beach area of subject property at waverunner but (building in rear to be removed) View looking N from interior of subject property (existing on left to remain; existing on right & in background to be removed) ~: ._ ~~., `~ 1 F ~o ~` au ': o~ ~° n View looking NE at attached dwellings at 530 S. Gulfview Blvd. r 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard FLD2008-12033/DVA2008-00002 Page 2 of 3 IIII View looking W at existing pazking gazage at accessory bike, etc. rental (to be screened under proposal) Q. View looking E at existing deck/dock at reaz of subject property ._ . _.. f "N r ' ~~~ ~, ~, 1 Mi ~i.. ~ti~ ~ ,. ti View looking NE at automobile service station at 601 Bayway Blvd. (across S. Gulfview Blvd. from subject property) ~. .~ ~~ ~. View looking S at hotel at 625 S. Gulfview Blvd. (E of subject property) 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard FLD2008-12033/DVA2008-00002 Page 3 of 3 View looking SW at hotel at 521 S. Gulfview Blvd. (W of subject property) ra '~ -n - ~ ~ I ~~ ~~ .us' j ~. View looking NE at miniature golf at 630 S. Gulfview Blvd. View looking NW along S. Gulfview Blvd. at development W of subject property (Shephard's on left) v Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials}: DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: William M. Shephard, Trustee MAILING ADDRESS: __. _- --._. -- .____ ___W__ _.__ -._ .___.___ ____ _ _. _ _ _ __ 619 S. Gulfview Blvd., C learwater, FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: _ _ 727-442-51 O7 FAX NUMBER: 727-44"j-2009 CELL NUMBER EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): -- -- - _ _, WIlham M. Shephard,_Trustee _ . _. __.----, _r _ ____ _ List ALL owners on the deed ._ AGENT NAME: Keith E. Zayac_ P.E. RLA MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road_East, Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER: 727_793_9$$$ FAX NUMBER: ']2']-793-98SS _ --- --- CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: keith@keithZayac.com B. INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: ShephardS Beach ReSOrt PROJECT VALUATION: $3S MIIIIOn _ ._ ___--_ __ ..W.__. _.__ __. _... _ _ _ - - . STREET ADDRESS 619 S. Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33767 PARCEL NunnBER(s): 17-29-15-OS004-003-0010; 17-29-15-00000-220-0100 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 2.68 total, 2,37 Within T ZOriing PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 103,237_.20 within T LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit B PROPOSED usE(s): 186 unit hotel and accessory uses DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See_ E_Xhibit B_ SpecificaAy identify the request (include number of units or square footage ofnon-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. ~ reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) I:1ShephardslPermitslCiiy of Clean~vaterlComprehensive Infill Project (FLD} 2008 07-i 1.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS DR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ` NO~ ('rf yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. O 1. WRITTEN SUBMRTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit B 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Exhibit B 3. The proposed deveiopment will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Exhibit B 4. The proposed development is designed to minim¢e traffic congestion. See Exhibit B 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit B 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Exhibit B 1:1ShephardslPermitslCity of ClearwaterSComprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc ~TTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set faith in this zoning district. See Exhibit D 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See Exhibit D 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See Exhibit D 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See Exhibit D 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. See Exhibit D 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on dernonstrated compliance wrth all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. in order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See ExhibiE D 1:1ShephardslPennitslCity of ClearwaterlComprehensive lnfill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11,doc E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21} A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Sierm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. O If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; D Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of ail structures; ^ AU adjacent streets and municipal stone systems; O Proposed stormwater detenfion/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan induding all calculatons and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual O Proposed stonnwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ Signature and feat of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITT (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permft), ff applicable O ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stonnwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A} SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; '~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, induding drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisY, of all trees 4° DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines} and condition of such trees; ~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submftta) of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shaft be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering prindples. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMiNARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; 1:1Shephards\PermftslCity of ClearwaterlComprehensive Int'ill Project (FLD} 2006 07-t i.doc G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.Aj ~i ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; ', Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of al] street rights-of-way within and ad}'acent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; location of all landscape materiaE; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Twa approvals. A Floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. ^ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; 103,237.20 10,000 103,237.20 - -.._ _._ _ ._____.r- --- Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 96 ovemighi Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; 186 overnight Gross floor area devoted to each use; See exhibit B Parking spaces: iota) number, presented in tabular form with the 220 186 384 number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces 8 driveways, 83,895 sf 98,075 sf 34,876 sf expressed in square feet 8 percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; 35 -100 ft 134 ft _ ____ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and D.88 0.95 0.83 _ _ ._ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ^ REDUCED COLOR 51TE PLAN to scale (8'r4 X 11); ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-toot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of ail earth or wafer retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); 5truciural overhangs; 1:1ShephardslPermitslCity of ClearwaterlComprehensive lnfill Projec! {FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) 01 LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24' x 36"): Atl existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas inGuding landscaping islands and cuffing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required - tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, sail mixes, badcfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; ____ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development BoaM); Irrigafion notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale {8'/z X 11); D COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applipble. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shat) exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met t. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) l3UtLDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations} Materials REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS --same as above to scale on 8 '/ X i 1 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS !Section 3-1806)5l~tt7'(~? (}~:? ~~f1;~"(~ f'C~GI~'('1~ D All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, heighf, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8 h X 11) (color), 'd submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. 1:1ShephardslPermitslCity of ClearwaterlComprehensive lnfill Project (FLD} 2Q08 07-11.doc K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager ar his/her designee ar it the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Wil! generate 100 ar more new vehicle directional trips per hour andlor 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or inkersedion with five (5) reportable akxidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual fist of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation sha-I be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (RE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting` held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Se ion 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement ^ Ackno Bement of traffic impact study requirements {Applipnt must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway Legs and each fuming movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration .Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER 5TUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water suppty is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The wafer supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpi and/or fire pump. H a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150°k of its raced capacity. Compliance with the 2D04 Florida ire Prevention Gode to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowl dgement of fire flow calculations/watersrudy requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Fiaw CalculationslWaierSfudy is included. Fire Ftow Calcutations/tlUater Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS! WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 5624334. M. SIGNATURE: !, the undersigned, acknowledge that al! representationsmode in this application are t and accurate to the best of my knowledge and au City representatives to visit and photograph the erty described in this application. ignature representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PIN~1..E1S Sw,ol~ to and subscribed before me this tp day of ,v y y a-M b-a-t~ , A.D. 20y ~ to me and/or by Z /i y ~ ~- , who is personally known has produced as identif on. Ota pU ll :......r.........y...~.reOT-~r `-.,'•s........... My ommi ion expires: KAy ~~{~~'~-~.aR~~:.~~;.~,"'. -~+""~ - r ~_~ _ _....,.~ = ss Expires 2IH/IOi2 1:1ShephardsiPemtitslCity of ClearwalerlComprehensive )nfill Project (F1D) 2008 0'i .~;c Page 7 of 8 °...."._,,.<... ~o+&Sa ~ryAssn., Inc N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of alt property owners on deed -PRINT Full names: tMliam M Shepherd, as Trustee under the provisions of the Shepherd Family Trust Agreemen dated February 29, 1984 _ Lagoon Resort Motel 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and n:cord title holder(s) of the following descnbed property (address or general tocaGon): 619 S. Gulfview Bind. 3• That this Propery constitutes the property for which a request fora: (descnbe request) 18(0 _ room overnight accommodations Induded within a Flexltrie Development Apptiption 4. That the undersigned (hasmave) appointed and (doesidoj appoinh i(e$h E Zayac, P.E., RLA; Harry S. Cline. ESQ. as (his/iheir) agent(sj to execute any petitions or other dogxnerNs necessary to affed such petition; 5. That this atfidavH has been executed to induce the Ctty of Clearwater, Flodda to consider and ad on the above described property; 619 S., Gutfvlew Blvd, 6. That site visgs to the property are necessary by Cify representatives in order b process this application and the owner authorizes City rePriesentatives to visk and photograph the property described in this appScation- tit 9 S. Gutfview 8htd. , 7. That wej, the underst ned rity, he y rx that fongo'mJg islt/ru/erand coned. perry O er -- Property Owner ~ -- --^---- - Property Owner - Property Owner -- -- STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELlAS Before met-the'undersign~ed', `an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this _ L~ "'- day of ~L~:~.~f ~J~_ personally appeared ~.,,~l~l-ate ;~ - wbo having been first duty swam Qeposes and says that he/she fully uniietstands the contents of the affidavrl that he/she signed. ,~.*.: MELISSA TR FAY :~- ~~''~; EMB *= CorrlmisslDn DD 626:143 - E~ires January 3, 2011 ~'Jj,`„~ e~xded7lruTmyFa>nYw~80o,ffirDt4 -- ---- - - -- - -- - _ --- Notary Public Signature Notary SeaUStamp My Commission Expires: f:l5hephatdslPermttslCity of CleanrraterlComprehensive tnfill Protect (FLD) 20DB 07-11.doc EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT, INC. 619 S. GULFVIEW BLVD. Section B. Description of Request The applicant Shephard's Beach Resort, Inc., has owned the property located at 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard ("Subject Property") for over 28 years. On the Subject Property, the applicant successfully operates a 96 room, three diamond resort, which is known as the Shephard's Beach Resort. Shephard's has been a staple in the beach community for close to three decades, providing relaxing overnight accommodations, breathtaking views of the Gulf of Mexico and sunsets, good food, and great entertainment. The existing portion of Shephard's to remain includes 96 hotel rooms, a 220 space non-peak parking garage, and other accessory uses. The number of overnight accommodation units on Clearwater Beach has been significantly reduced as a result of the hotel to condominium conversion over the recent years. In response, the applicant proposes to continue the existing overnight accommodation use and redevelop the Subject Property by renovating the existing hotel rooms and add additional mid-priced hotel rooms. A development agreement application is also submitted to transfer 68 hotel units from the available density reserve to this project based upon meeting the City requirements. Specifically, the applicant seeks flexible development approval of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, in accordance with the plans submitted with this application, including the following: 1. Flexible Development approval for the redevelopment of the overa112.689 acre property zoned tourist (T) District and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) to permit a 186-unit overnight accommodation use within the Tourist (T) District containing 2.37 acres. 2. Lot width of 243-feet along S. Gulfview Blvd. (north) 3. Front setback of 15.56-feet to existing building (north) 4. Front setback of 11.20-feet to proposed building (north) 5. Front setback of 6.50-feet to proposed pavement (north) 6. Side setback of 15.44-feet to proposed building (east) 7. Side setback of 0-feet to existing pavement (west) 8. Side setback of 0-feet to existing building (west) 9. Rear setback of 22.00-feet to existing building and patio/boardwalk (south) 10. Rear setback of 5.20-feet to proposed building from seawall (south) 11. Rear setback of 39.51-feet to proposed building from property line (south) 12. Rear setback of 0.00-feet to proposed pavement from seawall (south) 13. Rear setback of 22.00-feet to existing building from property line (south) 14. A building height of 133'-10" from BFE to top of roof deck 15.316 valet-only parking spaces plus 68 overflow spaces included for 384 total 16. Increase the permitted density by allocation of 68 overnight accommodation units from the reserve pool created pursuant to Beach by Design Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The adjacent property to the west is the renovated Holiday Inn, which is being converted to a mixed-use hotel/condominium development. North: The adjacent property to the north is a Hess gas station and convenience store, which will benefit from the proposed use and will serve the guests of the resort. East: The adjacent property to the east is the existing Econo Lodge Motel. South: The subject property is bounded on the south by the Gulf of Mexico and Clearwater Pass. The scale and size of the 2.689-acre project is less than the adjacent 4.87-acre Holiday Inn project. The proposed total 186 rooms are similar to the HI phase one total rooms of 189, and include the same character of overnight accommodations with accessory uses. The proposed building height of 133'-10" is within 22-feet of the adjacent HI building with similar height. Based on the similar characteristics of the adjacent development, the proposed development will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent property that has been renovated. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The Subject Property is currently occupied by the Shephard's Beach Resort, a 96- room mid-priced resort hotel, which is less than 60' in height and constructed in 1957. Forty rooms of the existing 96 rooms, a 192 parking space parking garage, and a night club were added to the Subject Property in 2001. The proposed project will improve current conditions on the Subject Property in a number of ways, including: (1) Superior architectural design, including tiered effect, and upgraded landscaping which will visually enhance the neighborhood and the beach community; (2) Construction of a new building which meets current building Codes, as opposed to maintaining the existing outdated building constructed over 45 years ago; (3) Surrounding property value will be positively impacted due to the construction of anew hotel, pool deck and site improvements. The project carries forward the redevelopment of the area started by the adjacent project to the north. These improvements will in no manner be a hindrance, but will serve to increase surrounding property values, improve safety and enhance the views of the site from adjacent parcels. The hotel guests of the proposed project will be potential clientele of nearby restaurants and other businesses. The hotel is consistent with the surrounding redevelopment, and will provide the tourist industry with update accommodations and group meeting space. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Demolition of the existing hotel built in 1957 and the construction of the proposed structures built to current building Codes, improves the safety of the building occupants and neighbors. The pedestrian access along Gulfview Boulevard will be modified to tie into the relocated driveways, but maintain handicapped access and enhanced sidewalk width. The project includes overnight accommodations and accessory uses that are consistent with the tourist district and does not contain any uses that would affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The applicant has provided a parking and trip generation study for the proposed project showing an excess amount of parking spaces compared with minimum requirements by code. The existing dead end parking lot will be removed and replaced with a front covered entrance for vehicle drop off, and a valet parking system with 236 stalls allocated that will speed up the circulation movements of the existing self park stalls in the parking garage. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The Subject property is located within Clearwater Pass District. The project is also consistent with the community character of the Clearwater Pass District, which Beach by Design describes as an area of mixed uses, including mid-priced motels and condominiums. As previously stated, the Subject Property currently functions as a hotel. The proposed use does not change the character, rather update and enhance the tourist area by providing moderately priced updated hotel rooms and accessory uses. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal at this south end of Clearwater Beach, which is also visible from Clearwater Pass, the Sand Key Bridge, and Sand Key Park. The architectural style integrates a seaside beach motel design, which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this waterfront property. The acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation for the proposed redevelopment project are consistent with the Subject Property's current use and the surrounding uses on the beach. The existing dead end surface parking is being relocated into an enclosed parking garage which will reduce noise and acoustic impacts of the cars. The applicant currently has an occupational license to operate a restaurant and will redevelop the Subject Property to include an upscale restaurant. The applicant is taking special care to create an enhanced "resort environment" with mid-priced rooms, which will benefit adjacent properties and businesses. The active areas such as the existing stage and pool bars are located in the rear of the project surrounded on three sides by buildings to minimize the impacts to adjacent property owners. The additional height will also serve to block sound escaping from the property, especially to the east, although the sound is well within the decibel level limit permitted by the City, having the sound better contained within the property will be a benefit. These uses are however, a positive impact and are highly utilized by both local patrons and tourists thereby increasing the tax revenues generated by the tourist district. EXHIBIT D Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. Height The request for 133'-10" when 35'-100' is allowed by Code is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design which provide that height may be increased to 150' if additional density is allocated to the development with bonus hotel units. There is a reasonable relationship between the height increase and the 68 additional resort hotel units based upon other cases recommended for approval by staff and actually approved by CDB consistent with Beach by Design. The additional height will allow for the increase in developable rooms, the necessary parking to be placed within an enclosed parking garage, rather than a surface parking lot and the ability to include amenities common to moderately priced hotels along the beach. Parking The Applicant has requested relief from Code parking requirements due to the fact that the parking serving the hotel will be full valet service. As such, the proposed plans incorporate a total of 316 non-peak full valet parking spaces and 384 peak full valet parking spaces in both garages. Setbacks The proposed front pavement setback reduction from 15.0 feet to 6.79 feet is required due to need for an exit driveway out of the proposed parking garage without an additional curb cut. The proposed planting areas along South Gulfview will be in excess of minimum requirements and heavily landscaped to screen the driveway and offset the requested relief. No surface parking is proposed as part of the new construction. The existing side pavement setback reduction from 10.0 feet to 0.0 feet was approved under DCAB Case Number V-98-05 for a loading area which is currently active and services the existing hotel. The existing side building overhang reduction from 10.0 to 0.0 feet was approved under DCAB Case Number V-98-05 for the covered storage and work area associated with deliveries and food storage. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. Overnight accommodations are allowed uses in the "Resort Facilities High" residential/overnight accommodation." in the "Tourist" zoning district. Primary land use category are "high density 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The improvement of the site will pave the way for future redevelopment and set an example for the style of quality architecture envisioned by Beach by Design. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. There is no anticipated damage or loss to the adjoining properties. The requested side setback reductions along the west property line are existing conditions that currently exist. No further construction will take place along the west property line. The proposed construction along the east property line will comply with the required code setbacks, along with a larger than required green area. The proposed height is consistent with adjacent re-development activity west of the site. In addition the updated hotel will provide an increase in tourist visits that will utilize the services of the surrounding restaurants, bars, and retail businesses. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise k land use category, be compatible substantially alter the essential use and shall demonstrate compliance objectives: e permitted by the underlying future with adjacent land uses, will not characteristics of the neighborhood; with one or more of the following a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The proposed use meets several of these criteria. Overnight accommodations are permitted by the "Resort Facilities High" land use category and in the "Tourist" zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard, and flexible use. Redevelopment of Clearwater Beach is a significant economic contributor to the City. The proposed use is an economic contributor by increasing the number of tourists to Clearwater Beach and encouraging patronization of local businesses. The proposed project will generate new jobs in the City of Clearwater. The proposed use as overnight accommodations is characteristic of the neighborhood, specifically as the entrance to South Clearwater Beach. The use of the property is the same as the property immediately to the east and west and compatible with the redeveloped site to the west based on size, height and other development criteria. The proposed development also expands an existing economic contributor by expanding the rooms available, updated the quality of the hotel with new rooms and a parking garage, while providing additional employment opportunities to hotel support staff based on an expansion of facilities. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. The requested side setback variances along the west property line are for existing conditions pertaining to the existing pavement, freezers and building canopy. The property affected by the reductions is currently under redevelopment based on approved plans that took into account the existing conditions on the subject property, and has impeded the development of the site. The height variance is similar to the variance approved on the property west of the site. The height is also consistent with other approvals within the tourist district of the "beachfront property." It is anticipated that the remainder of the future development property along South Gulfview will develop in a similar highest and best use. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. The proposed project is designed to meet the requirements of Beach by Design in scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character. The stepped massing of the project is derived from the massing requirements of Beach by Design. The project places active spaces internal to the project site to reduce noise transmission and visual distraction to adjacent properties. The location of the units on the site provides all units in the project with water views and provides easy access for all guests to the nearby businesses by providing a handicapped accessible sidewalk from the front entrance of the building to the adjacent sidewalk within the right of way. This project furthers the City's beachside revitalization objective of creating by punctuating the newly improved beachfront with a moderately priced accommodations priced from $165 to $260 per night. The project's "modern tropical" architecture compliments the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. We provide the following information concerning the height, tower separation, design, scale, and mass criteria: Heiaht and Tower Seaaration The project consists of an existing two story hotel connected to an existing dining facility, public spaces, six story guest towers, and parking garage. The Owner proposes to demolish the vast majority of existing two story portion of the hotel, while retaining the balance of the buildings on the property and constructing a new tower, 133'-10" in height as measured from the FEMA minimum flood plain elevation to the top of the main roof. Per Beach by Design VII B: "...the height may be increased, however to one hundred fifty feet (150') if": B. 1. "Additional density is allocated to fhe development by .., bonus hofe/ units... " a) The project is requesting 68 units from the hotel density reserve. 6.2 (a) "Portions of any structures which exceed one hundred feet (100') (in height) are spaced at least 100' apart." and "For structures which exceed 100' within 800'....do not occupy 40% of a north south vertical plane..." a) There are no projects which exceed 100' within 800' of the proposed development. (See Attached Development Relationship Plan) • B.3. "The floor plate of any portion of a building that exceeds forty-hve feet in height is limited as follows: a) The largest floor plate between 45' and 100' does not exceed 25,000 square feet and is 21,038 square feet. b) The largest floor p/afe between 100' and 150' exceeds 10,000 square feet and is approximately 15,292 square feet at the 11~' and 12th levels. Per Beach by Design deviations to the above floorplate requirements maybe approved provided the mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelop allowance above 45'. The proposed building does not exceed 25,000 square feet and the mass/sca/e of the building creates a tiered effect thus allowing a deviation from Beach by Design. The floor plate of the building above fhe 45-feef level offset occurs at elevation 43'-8"and is offset by 8'-9': Once we reach elevation 100-feet (actual 82'-4"), the building is offset again by 5'-0" as prescribed by Beach by Design. c) Design, Scale and Mass of Building: 1. Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5000 square feet or a single dimension of greater than one hundred (100) feet will be constructed so that no more than two (2) of the three (3) building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. For this purpose, equal in length means that the two lengths vary by less than forty (40%) of the shorter of the two (2) lengths. The horizontal plan measurements relate to the footprint of the building. a. The plans have been organized so that no more than two (2) of the three (3) building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. 2. No plane of a building may continue uninterrupted for greater than one hundred linear feet (100'). For the purpose of this standard, interrupted means an offset of greater than five feet (5'). a. The plans have been organized so that no plane of the building will continue uninterrupted for greater that one hundred linear feet (100'). 3. At least sixty percent (60%) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. For the purpose of this standard, an elevation is that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development. a. A tabulation of glazing has been placed on Sheets A-20B and A- 21 B. 4. No more than sixty percent (75%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above forty-five feet (45') will be occupied by a building. For the purpose of this standard, theoretical maximum building envelope is the maximum permitted building volume that could be theoretically occupied by a building including any portion of the maximum possible building envelope that is not visible from a public street. a. Pease see illustration below indicating how the mass of the building is no more that twelve percent (12%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope for existing and proposed located above forty-five feet (45'). HE~I(iHT LI-MIT T I50'~' 0" (+164'-0" NAND) . .._ :. T~ ::.: ~ _.:~ ~ !. ~ t __ _.. j . ~ _i ~ ~ ~~ ii ) ~ ,..:.~ ~( ) ~ I HE1~ '. THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE I00% 12% OF MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) IN CUBIC FEET 75% OF THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE LOCATED ABOVE 45' 5. The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. a. The building has been designed to comply with this requirement of Beach by Design. 6. Buildings may be designed for a vertical or horizontal mix of permitting uses. a. The building is designed to provide a moderately priced waterfront family style hotel with a pool, restaurant, nightclub, and other accessory services. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; a. The proposed site creates a visually responsive design for the emerging character of Clearwater Beach and seeks to facilitate a dialogue with the surrounding areas by incorporating a number of architectural elements which speaks to the human scale such as the entrance portico, the awnings located along north and east elevations as well as the landscape which plays the most important role in communicating to the human scale. . d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; The building design provides multiple horizontal plane changes which allows the building to create a tiered effect at the higher elevations by offsetting the floor plate of the building above the 45' level, (actual offset occurs at 43' 8'~, by 8' 9"and again offsetting the floor plate at the 100' level, (actual offset occurs at 82' 4'~, by 5°-0" as prescribed by Beach by Design. • Use of architectural details such as cornices, medallions, awnings, columns, etc; The building utilizes a variety of architectural elements beginning with the angled columns at the portico entrance as well as the free standing columns which penetrates the balconies and frames the south elevation. The use of a cornice has been placed at the very top of the building to create a termination point for the facade. Pilasters can be found throughout all four elevations of the new and existing buildings further creating cohesiveness among the project. The balconies give the building more character by projecting off the building and by also creating transitional nodes along the elevations. The railings on the balconies shall be picket type matching the old tower on the property. The use of awnings can be found along the "Beach Walk" in order to bring the building down to human scale. • Variety in materials, colors and textures; A variety of materials have been introduced to make this project architecturally pleasing such as the smooth white stucco that will blanket a majority of the walls. Green screen walls are located on the east and west elevations of the pool deck which further provides color, texture and material variation and is used to mask the garage and introduce a tropical environment for the pool deck. The decorative metal mesh screening provides another layer of material which is primarily used to hide the parking structures. The glazing on the building and the picket railings on the balconies also adds another layer of detail to the project. Distinctive fenestration patterns; The fenestration pattern on the lower levels of the west elevation relate to the function behind them. They are large glazed openings to reveal the retail space behind them. Located above the glazed openings is the green screen trellis system used to mask the garage and create a natural environment for the pool deck. On the north and south elevations the lower level fenestrations are metal mesh screening panels with reveal patterns. The metal mesh screening panel system helps ensure the garage can be classified as an open garage per The Florida Building Code section 406 opening requirements. The East elevation utilizes the same metal mesh screening located on the north and south elevations; however this elevation is more distinct because of the projections created approximately every 29' 0" to comply with the Beach by Design horizontal dimensional criteria. Glazed fenestrations are used primarily throughout the tower elevations to provide daylight to the hotel units and common areas. Building setbacks; In the vertical plane the building design provides multiple step backs which allows the building to create a tiered effect at the higher elevations by offsetting the floor plate of the building above the 45' level, (actual offset occurs at 43' 8'~, by 8' 9" and again offsetting the floor plate at the 100' level, (actual offset occurs at 82' 4'~, by 5' 0" as prescribed by Beach by Design. In the horizontal plane the building continues to step back and forth with 5°-0" or more offsets at not more than 100' 0"intervals. • Distinctive roofs forms. The building's roof design creates unique and distinctive forms in the new tower with angled projections at 3 of the four corners. These architectural elements are also repeated at the existing stair towers of the old building to create a greater level of cohesiveness among the project. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The proposed project consists of overnight accommodations and assesory uses which will be visually enhanced on three sides of the property. These enhancements will correspond with the development to the west of Shephards creating a visual appearance along S. Gulfview. The east buffer will have a with a 5-foot landscape buffer consisting of Variegated Pittosporums and groups of Sabal palms between the proposed stormwater vaults and property line. On the west side of the property there is an existing fence that will be left intact for screening purposes with additional linear footage vinyl fencing. This area also consists of existing vegetation which creates a screening effect from the hotel to the west. The area on the north side of the property contains existing vegetation and a broad range of landscaping enhancements. The front of the property will match the newly redeveloped hotel landscaped frontage along S. Gulfview and will be a great enhancement to Shephards Beach Resort. Seagrapes will also be installed along the accessory uses creating a screened effect from pedestrian and other establishments. The south property line is limited on landscape enhancements due to the buffer along the south property line includes a low maintenance viburnum hedge and palm trees. It is anticipated that once the property south of this development is redeveloped, the same condition as the north property line will be encountered without public view or access. PARKING STUDY FOR SHEPARDS BEACH RESORT 619 SOUTH GULFVIEW BLVD. CLEARWATER ,FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: SHEPARDS BEACH RESORT PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. REVISED OCTOBER 2009 PROJECT # 08-067 Robez~t Pergolizzi, P, PTP AICP #9023, PTP #I33 I. INTRODUCTION The applicant is proposing to redevelop their property on Clearwater Beach into a 186 room resort hotel. (See Figure 1} The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in Tourist "T" zoning district. This application requires an assessment of the parking characteristics of the redevelopment. Shepard's cu~Tently has 96 existing hotel rooms and is located at 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard. The existing parking garage is manned by valet service and has the ability to park up to 220 cars for peak conditions. Some surface spaces are open for self-parking. Based on City of Clearwater requirements, on-site parking should include 1.2 parking spaces per hotel room. This would result in a code requirement of 224 parking spaces. The City of Clearwater has requested a detailed analysis estimating the number of parking spaces actually needed to service the various functions of the proposed resort hotel once it is redeveloped. Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. This parking study has been revised numerous times based on comments received by the City of Clearwater staff and subsequent modifications to the plan. II. PARKING SUPPLY After redevelopment a new parking garage will be constructed on the eastern portion of the site and the surface spaces will be removed. The total parking supply under noi•rnal operations will be 316 code compliant spaces, however with the ability to park up to 68 vehicles in garage aisles (28 in the existing garage and 40 in the proposed garage} during peak demand periods the ultimate total will be 384 spaces in the garages. The existing garage will be serviced by valets on an as- needed basis, and the proposed garage serviced by valets at all times. In addition, vehicle stacking will be provided in the porte-cochere area. III. PARKING DI{aMAND Shepard's Beach Resort will have several components that will generate the need for parking vehicles. The facility will include 186 hotel rooms, internal restaurant, a small retail gift shop, a night club, and meeting rooms with seating for up to 300 meeting attendees. The facility is designed to encourage the interaction between the hotel guests and these other accessory on-site uses. The general manager of Shepard's provided data regarding expected staffing, occupancy, hours of operation of accessory uses, and mode of travel of staff and hotel guests. The parking demand assumptions for hotel staff, hotel guests, retail/night club staff, night club patrons and meeting attendees are summarized in Table 1. Hotel staff will operate on three shifts per day. Shift A (7 AM -3:30 PM would employ 45 staff members under normal operations and up to 65 staff under full occupancy. Shift B (3 PM - 11:30 PM} would employ 45 staff members under 1 a CQ W w C7 v~ PROJECT LOCATION -- Shepard's Beach Resort I o8JEo67~ DATE: FIGURE: Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting 102008 nRAwrl nY: G.J.S. TABLE 1 - SHEPARD'S BEACH RESORT • PARKING DEMAND CALCULATIONS NORMAL OCCUPANCY (70%) FULL OCCUPANCY+ MEETINGS SPACES REQUIRED SPACES REQUIRED aiiurTinN VARIARI F NIIMRFR PFR3~NIROOM SPACES NUMBER PERSONlROOM SPACES HOTEL STAFF SHIFT A TAM-3:30PM EMPLOYEES 45 40% USE CAR 18 65 40% USE CAR 25 HOTEL STAFF SHIFT B 3PM -1 i:30PM EMPLOYEES 45 40% USE CAR 18 65 40°k USE CAR 28 HOTEL STAFF SHIFT C 11PM-TAM EMPLOYEES 10 40% USE CAR 4 20 40% USE GAR 8 HOTEL GUESTS 186 ROOMS 70% ROOMS 130 50°k USE CAR 65 18$ 50% USE CAR 93 RETAIL SHOPS & NIGHT CLUB EMPLOYEES 10 40% USE CAR 4 15 40% USE CAR 5 NIGHT CLUB PATRONS PERSONS 210 20% USE CAR 42 300 20% USE CAR 60 MEETING ATTENDEES HOTEL GUEST PERSONS NA NA 0 240 NA 0 MEETING ATTENDEES NON-GUEST PERSONS NA NA 0 60 2 PERSONS/CAR 30 TIKI DECK DAYTIME PATRONS PERSONS 200 20% USE CAR 40 300 20% USE CAR 60 ASSUMPTIONS: NORMAL OCCUPANCY IS 70% WITH 50% HOTEL GUESTS USING CAR, OTHER 50% ARRIVE BY SHUTTLE, TAXI, LIMO) EMPLOYEE PARKING IS LIMITED TO 40% OF EMPLOYEES USING A CAR BASED ON EXISTING DATA MEETING ROOM CAPACITY IS 300 SEATS, 80%ASSUMED STAYING AT THE HOTEL, 20% ARRIVE BY CAR 2 PERSONS PER CAR EMPLOYEE REQUIREMENTS BASED ON SHEPARDS PROJECTIONS NIGHTCLUB PATRONS AND TIKI DECK PATRONS BASED ON SHEPARDS DATA normal operations and up to 65 staff under full occupancy. Sluff C (11 PM -7 AM) would employ 10 staff members under normal operations up to 20 staff under full occupancy, The gift shop (7 AM - 11 PM} and the night club (9 PM - 2 AM) would require 10 employees under normal operations and up to 15 employees under peak season operations. Based on existing employee travel patterns approximately 40% of the employees will require a parkuig space since many employees travel by bus, trolley, and bicycle. During normal occupancy periods 70% of the hotel rooms are expected to be occupied which translates to 130 rooms. During rare full occupancy all 18d rooms would be used. Based on existing travel patterns approximately 50% of the hotel guests would require a parking space for a rental car, whereas the remaining SO% would arrive by others modes of travel such as taxicab, limousine service or hotel shuttle. The on-site night club is expected to serve 210 patrons on normal nights and up to 300 patrons during peak season. The night club primarily draws from hotel guests or guests of other hotels within walking distance, however, it was assumed 20% of the patrons would use a car requiring a parking space. The outdoor Tiki Deck is expected to serve 200 patrons on normal days and up to 300 patrons during peak season. The Tiki Deck primarily draws from hotel guests or guests of other hotels within walking distance, however, it was assumed 20% of the patrons would arrive by car requiring a parking space. The outdoor Tiki Deck is normally utilized in the afternoon and early evenings dtu•ing daylight hours. Meeting room capacity is 300 attendees. Shepards intends to market the meeting rooms to hotel guests therefore it was assumed 80% of the attendees would be hotel guests, and the remaining 20% would be arriving by car with an average of 2 persons per car. This would generate the need for 30 parking spaces. meeting were assumed to occur between 9 AM and 6 PM. A. NORMAL OCCUPANCY An analysis was conducted by time-of--day to determine the total number of parking spaces needed for normal occupancy conditions with no meetings. Table 2 summarizes the parking demand for this condition as ranging between 69 and 142 parking spaces. B. FULL OCCUPANCY WITH MEETINGS An analysis was conducted by time-of--day to detei•~nine the total number of parking spaces needed for full occupancy conditions with 300 meeting attendees. 2 TABLE 2 • NORMAL OCCUPANCY - TIME OF DAY PARKING DEMAND HOTEL STAFF EMPLOYEES HOTEL RETAILlNIGHl NIGHT CLUB TIKI DECK TOTAL rie~c ocoinn cuioT a Su1FT R SulrT r_ ri IFCTC ci uR STAFF PATRONS PATRONS DEMAND 12 MID-1 AM 4 65 4 42 115 1 AM - 2 AM 4 73 4 42 123 2 AM - 3 AM 4 65 69 3 AM - 4 AM 4 65 69 4 AM - 5 AM 4 65 69 5 AM - 6 AM 4 65 69 6 AM - 7 AM 4 65 69 7 AM - 8 AM 18 4 65 1 88 8 AM - 9 AM 18 65 1 84 9 AM -10 AM 18 65 1 84 10 AM -11 AM 18 65 1 84 11 AM -12 NOON 18 65 1 40 124 12 NOON -1 PM 18 65 1 40 124 1 PM - 2 PM 18 65 1 40 124 2 PM - 3 PM 18 18 65 1 40 14Z 3 PM - 4 PM 18 18 65 1 40 142 4 PM - 5 PM 18 65 1 40 124 5 PM - 6 PM 18 65 1 40 124 6 PM - 7 PM 18 65 1 40 124 7 PM -8 PM 18 65 1 40 124 8 PM - 9 PM 18 65 4 87 9 PM -10 PM 18 65 4 42 129 10 PM -11 PM 18 4 65 4 42 133 11 PM -12 MID 18 4 65 4 42 133 Table 3 summarizes the parking demand for this condition as ranging between 101 and 236 parking spaces. IV. COMPARION OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND A comparison was made to determine whether the calculated parking demand can be reasonably met with the proposed number of spaces to be provided on-site. During periods of normal occupancy the 142 space demand represents 45% of the proposed parking supply. During periods of foil occupancy the 236 space demand represents 75% of the standard parking supply of 316 code-compliant spaces and 61% of the total proposed parking supply of 384 spaces including aisle valet parking in the garages. As such adequate parking will be provided for the hotel operations. V. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff and unique characteristics of Shepard's Beach Resort. This analysis demonstrates hotel operations can easily be accommodated with the proposed 316 on-site parking spaces and 68 overflow parking spaces. TABLE 3 -FULL OCCUPANCY AND MEETINGS • TIME OF DAY PARKING DEMAND HOTEL STAFF EMPLOYEES HOTEL RETAIUNIGHI NIGHT CLUB T1KI DECK MEETING TOTAL mower w ~u~er a ewer P AI ICCTC RI IIO 4TARP P6TRANC PATRAN3 ATTENDEES DEMAND 12 MID•1 AM 8 93 6 80 187 1 AM - 2 AM 8 93 B 60 187 2AM-3AM 8 93 101 3AM-AAM 6 93 101 4AM-bAM B 93 101 5AM-fiAM 8 93 101 eAM-7AM 8 93 701 7AM - 8 AM 28 8 93 1 128 8 AM - 9 AM 28 93 1 120 9 AM -10 AM 28 93 1 30 150 10 AM - i 1 AM 28 93 1 30 1 SO 11 AM -12 NOON 28 93 1 80 30 210 12 NOON • 1 PM 28 93 1 80 30 210 1 PM - 2 PM 28 93 1 80 3D 210 2 PM - 3 PM 26 28 93 1 60 30 298 3 PM - 4 PM 28 26 93 1 60 30 23b 4 PM - b PM 28 93 1 60 30 2i0 5 PM - 8 PM 26 93 1 60 30 210 8 PM - 7 PM 26 93 1 60 180 7 PM -B PM 26 93 1 60 160 B PM - 9 PM 26 93 B 125 9 PM - 10 PM 26 93 B 60 185 10 PM - 11 PM 28 8 93 6 80 193 1 i PM - 12 MID 26 8 93 a 60 193 1~.~'~i~2E'°f~B 19:C~I 7~"5F~49E,1 FUfi~I~ UTILITIE=S ~ PMGE 6? ~~LJ 18 Y 1 A..tJ~ CITY OF CLEARIAFATER VttATER DERkRTNENT .~~ ~I` TI=ST a 1 ~ o l ~ ~ ,~~ t ,~, ~ ~~ ~ r~~.S~~ ~~ Cyr i F~~~- - c~l~ jral ~ ~ ~-~,r )1![ER REQUL5TING TE3'i' / M Clearwater Fire ~ Rescue 610 Franklin Street- Clearwater, Florida 33756 Public Works Administration -Engineering Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 -Clearwater, Florida 33756 ~~)j4,~~~~ y 4 ~; +~N„yy~ta t~;~, ~.~h~~° FfpE}'FLOW &~ HYQRAN;1'~VVORKSHEET``~r r+w, ~ ), f.fc~, U~<,,~,~~w~,'y9 h>l~~r, y~~ R, ~i~s: M5'r~~`dP.'~.~~r~k~~ _~tdwl5~1~~1~ ~ n..h:;ikr"}:i4i.'~, ,. r,.l.:~~: ,k !, . .~i ,..~,. ,'F. ~., ..1rCis ..:trf S~htfi.+~Fi:# ~a~ 41/Jar+9nR8'.9,~'i1,.4rt~.!~I~~.:,a? : ~~n~'~~.a~.,:d? (Revised 03/29/2006) This worksheet is required to be submitted to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to DRC meeting for any project that is more than 3 stories or more than 30 feet in height above the lov~est Fire Dept vehicle access point or for any other project chat will require an Automatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Rre Pump before any permitsfor new building construction, building expansion or fire h;~irantswill be issued by the City of Clearwater. Information and design must comply v~ith Florida Building Code, Chapter 9 -Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire Prevention Coda to indude applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13, 13D, 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20, 291 and 1142 Annex H) and AWWA M-17 -Installation, Field Testing and Maintenance of Rre Hydrants. :~, ~S. y ~+ ~ : d:., F' ~- ' '"~~,b"y! ~ + ~i~ s Tr:l`,. ! Pg' o, a ,::tom y~~v Sklrt~f Olt, a MtS~ R t ;rXn'i, r rr~, ~. rf -a + i ~~bMrx"~113~i :. i ° @rx rrttl~,.ti.J. , d., [~.1 i T% ~~P~OJ~E~x~~jNF~O„I-ZMATIO;.N~~~r.~~~n~Y~Y~,.3ra:~~~~rGtyr)~,.1:,,~.~#.+~~~ta?~,l.~~in~~.~~1+1.,x~r~ra~~: ~~ .~ar.v:{;,~#,~,r:~per,~~~,'~i~}'~`~s~~~'~~;'~~~.~~.~~~'?j~t~.,~±~i~n~f~.i:r~,~:~J. Project Nam e: Soh .Ward's Beach Resort Project Address: h 9 S. Gnlfview Blvd. Location of NearestFireHydrant Nnrthwa.et (;nrnar of PrrnertL Hydrant#: 285A Size ofWaterMain Supplying Rre Row: ~ ~ 2~- Looped System or Dead End WaterMain?_Lr,nned Static: y ~ psi Residual: 59 psi Pitot: 51 psi Flow: 1200 9pm Distance of Test Gauges Relative ~ the Base of the I~ser. Horizontal Ft. Vertical Elevation 2 .5 ~,. Ft. Hydrant TestConducted by: ~.; t~ Y,f f'1 Parwatar. Water Pen~ment (IncludelAttach Copy of Actual Test Sheet) `~ N-~~ F~r'y,!~ ~~ N ~~ La'AR ~ 1.r L'a~G S J FI11.MT I ~ IY~Is ~' !~ ~ ~ „ ~ Y ti rY- -- ~1~y 2~ llJa i ~f~~q'lhr~ 4°w~l'It ~~L 1r tsliY~ihJhr~'L ab ti: L`T 'l ~~ ~, y~TS 1 , Y1tfn'~J k~+kl4r RK.~3.N!F ~ Ot.7. ~::.i...~_7t .. F .. ...G7n:.. ., 1'G~Ld ~. -' ~1LS :r ~t.~~4... xA.r: t.,. :, I. U:~'.:4fx .4y ST..1N. A._ l.~ +1... c,; ~,.s~ia5a15L$}r{.'~i.~lcdSi+,~r ~: .~ + h~., 1 u~L,X~gvY' Area # Classification Description of Hazard Pratected (CommodltyDescription,StorageHeightandArrangement ifapplicable): 1 Grdinary Hazard Parking Garage AffachAdditionat SheefsifNecessary Page 1 of 3 p ~~ r~ S ., .. .. dDES N 'A `M ETSE Sa` ~~: ~ ~ ,l,k.~ r~ ~ ~~' ~ ' ,, ^,~ ~ ~. L ,t,,r,~ fx,,,~4 ,'~,~ .s A .. ..~~~ ul, kt4~1,.`~W`..:...w~,.,....`St....A,~,~v~e~am'~ia~`~. ..4, i3: ~, ~' 1.. :.Z,1 ii.. .F.. .a ~1,~6~51~=~1?v'~ rir.:f'{.,'~~ t ~ I:k~ Area # System Type Area (sq. ft.) Density (gprr/ft) Inside Hose (gpm) Oufside Hose (gpm) ~ [het Sprinkler 1500 .15 50 0 AttachAdditional Sheetslf Necessary Total Needed Fre Row(N.F.F.) 275 GPM Is Existing System Supply Sufficient to Meet N.F.F. Above? No g Yes System Component Applicable NFPA Standarnr /Year Edition and O~erApplicab/e Codes or Statufes Sprinklers NFPA 13 2002 Stand Pipe NFPA 14 2003 Fire Pump NF AttachAdditlonal ShaetsifNecessary If Project Indudes Fire Pump, Supplythe Following: Fire Pump lnforrnation: Pump Capacty: 1000 gpm Rated Pressure: 120 p~+ On-Site Storage Tank Capacity(?): None Chum Pressure: 137 psi Pressure @ 150% Flow: 90 psi f 2 ~ ~ i ,P' ~ a ti p ~ s d , ~~ w~l r '-~` ' ~'r 'i~ i~ ~ ~~3' RREP~` ' rI S~ CI~':fERINFORI~I~/yTION ~'~ f ~e~S.Uw,ivw-4~+~IItM;ia~~~4~ttas~at$rm~c.nlSSb~§,xvs.ad.,~,. _.rx.: ~t,~,..,...~,~a-r. r x\z~5Yhi3 .;~ i1 ~kn ~ ,t~~, 1 ~ 1;~y:-, ~ 3 r~w,.~~ttsiJa' _ ~.R ~..~ ~a~. ',i„t it v` ~~',~t-~i~ , ti 1~l~. x -.A`;~P!~P'.,~., la~,~Ct<,~.1 <1P~.~~~tt~ PreparerName: David C. Covalt. P.E. Company Name: DeRose Design Consultants, Inc. MailingAddress: 470 S. Andrews Ave. , Suite 206 City: pompano Beach State: Florida yip: 33069 Phone: (954) 942-7703 Fax: (954) 942-7933 P.E. Seal rr~°"°'' ~Gf~ ~~ Page 2 of 3 tiy' ~ ~. .. , .. .. ~ .` ., ' i .. > Y 4 #~t~i, h ~ ~~i { '~ i j 1{p ¢ YN C~t: t IW2 . ~LLy' 4 i 4 tah :) `,i ~x ~F i. 4.i ~ t ~r ~M~ ... I~p+,:.,.o,~!~:~~Is~O.~NA L~ ,I,;N FO,~tM %°A~;T I ®N.i4,R.EQ lJ I,~~2 E Qr~~ .~~~s~.a~.li?;'f~,';~`6,ct;;±~:t~;~ ~~,~~k N t~~~t~,~,¢),~,~r ~,'1~k`~Antk~,•~''~'s,"~~~~~~~~~~,~:~'~,,~o.ii.~~Rfw~rr Fire Prevention Items to be Addressed Prior to DRC Approval: ( 1. Provide Fire Flow Cahulations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION FSIGINEER to assure an adequate water supply 's available and to determine f any upgrades are required by the dedeloper due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/orfire pump. If a fire pump is required, the water suppy must be able to suppy 150% of its rated capavity. Compliance v~ith the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, NFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA291, and NFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. 2. When an FDC is required, ~ shall be a mininum of 15 feetfrorn building and shall had e a fire ~ dram vdithin 40 feet This hydrant shall nok be located on the same main as the Fire Sprinkler and must be on the suppy side of a double detector check valve. This hydrant is in addtion to the tydrant that is requiredforfirctighting purposes that is to be within 300 feet of building, as the hose lays, and on the same side of the strect as the projevt 3. Provide and show on the plan a minimum 30~od turning radius for emergency v ehble ingress and egress at ali entrances and exits. 4. Prov ide and show on the sfte plan 24 feet of width at drideways /drive aisles f or emergency vehicle ingress and egress for frmt and rear parking lots, Where driveways are split try an island vdith one-way traffic, each side of the 'eland shall prwideand show on the site plan 20f eet• of vdidth at the drN eways on each side of the island. 5. Provide a Fire Department access roadway (with turn-around,Y, T or cul-de~ac) in accordance v,rith NFPA 1. A Fire Department access roadway must have 24#oot clear width and 14-#ootvertical clearance, and be capable cf supporting the weight of Fire Department vehicles (80,DOOIbs} 1. Building - 3 Floors New Wing 2,3,&4 Levels Total S.F. 47,164 Fire Area Building is Type II 100~,Sprinkler Coverage •~ (222) - NFPA 1 Table H5.1 Fire Flow•.~s 2250 GPM .... By H5.2.1 Fire Fl:o:w_~fo.r Fully Sprinklered Building can b~~;r~ec~uced by 75~ & Min. Flow Not Less Than 1000 GPM ' .2250 - .75(2250) = 562.5 Required Fire Flow - 1000 GPM Water Supply - 12in. Municiple Water Main - Bin. Fire Main'to Buildin g Residual Pressure -53 PSI 2 0.001123Q Velocity Pressure Required for Flow (1000 GPM) P = _ 4 D 12in. DI - 12.4"ID Pressure Required to Flow 1000 GPM P = ,0475 PSI Bin. DI - 8.33' ID Pressure Required. to Flow 1000 GPM P = ,2555 PSI Water Supply is Sufficient for Fire Flow to Building Page 3 of 3 % ti.`: 1 7~~tT F' C 7r1 Q C.1.. F`IIFi Ti" I iT7-_ITiCS< P:°,GE O~7 SHEPHARDS BEACH RESORT STORMWATER NARRATIVE Existing Conditions The site currently contains no stormwater treatment or attenuation systems. The stormwater runoff currently runs directly into the City right of way and Clearwater Pass. Proposed Conditions SWFWMD and City of Clearwater stormwater criteria require treatment of the first 3/" of runoff over the new construction area prior to discharge to the Gulf of Mexico. The proposed storm water treatment and attenuation system consists of a 22.66 ft x 41.92 ft x 3 ft[deep] concrete vault in series with a StonnTrap Concrete Vault System. The aforementioned storm water system provides 4,092 cubic feet of treatment volume prior to discharging thru a control. structure [weir/control elev. = 5.50] into Clearwater Pass. Details of the treatment system are provided within the civil construction plans. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS New Project Area: Treatment Require Volume Required: Volume Provided: 1. Vault System; 2. StormTrap Vault; 63,775 sq-ft ment: 3/" over new project area site '/" x 63,775 SF = 3,98b cu-ft Elev: 5.5 - Z.5 = 3.0 ft x 949 sf = 2,847 cu-ft Elev: 5.5-2.5=3.0 ft x 415 sf =1,245 cu-ft Total = 4,092 cu-ft MODRET Infiltration Simulation Information: "Pond Bottom Area" =bottom area of StormTrap system = 415 sf "Pond Length to Width Ratio" =length to width ratio of StormTrap system Please refer to MODRET chart INFILTRATION:SHEPHARD'S wherein the treatment volume of 3,986 cf recovers in approximately 4.25 hours. 1:15hephardslPermits\City of Clearwater\StormwaterNarrative rev Oct14 2009.doc ~~ MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PROJECT NAME : Shepherd's POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (UW) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Levei Elevation of Pond Bottom Design High Water Level Elevation Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Anaiysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/Exfiltration Trench Hydraulic Control Features: Groundwater Control Features - Y/N Distance to Edge of Pond Elevation of Water Level Impervious Barrier - Y/N Elevation of Barrier Bottom 415.00 ftZ 3,986.00 ft3 12.45 -5.00 ft 2.00 ft 5.50 ft Z.50 ft 5.60 ft O.Zl 3.30 ft/d 2.00 5.00 ft/d o.Zl lA0 Top Bottom Left Right N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo o.oo o.oo o.oo N N N N 0.00 0.00 0..00 0.00 Analysis Date: 10/14/Z009 2/,F u ~ ! TIME -RUNOFF INPUT DATA PROJECT NAME: SHEPHARD'S STRESS PERIOD NUMBER INCREMENT OF TIME (hrs) VOLUME OF RUNOFF (ft3) Unsat 0.00 0.00 1 1.00 3,689.00 2 0.50 0.00 3 0.50 0.00 4 0.50 0.00 5 0.50 0.00 6 0.50 0.00 7 0.50 0.00 8 0.50 0.00 9 0.50 0.00 Analysis Date: 10J14/2009 3/ ~, 5 MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS ~ PR09ECT NAME : Shephard's ~ CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE {cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) oo.oo - a.oo 2.ooa o.ooo o.ooooo 0.00 2.000 0.28359 0.27942 1.00 5.567 0.27525 0.00 0.27317 1.50 5.555 0.27010 0.00 0.26702 2.00 5.543 0.26387 0.00 OZ6072 2.50 5.531 0.25764 0.00 0.25456 3.00 5.520 0.25146 0.00 0.24837 3.50 5.508 0.24521 0.00 0.24205 4.00 5.498 0.23906 0.00 0.23607 4.50 5.487 0.23304 0.00 0.23000 5.00 5.476 0.00 Maximum Water Elevation: 5.567 feet @ 1.00 hours Recovery @ 5.000 hours * Time increment when there is no runoff Maximum Infiltration Rate: 0.606 ft/day Analysis Date: 10/14/2009 4~5 INFILTRATION : SHEPHARD'S asoD - _ _ 4,500 - - - ~ !~ 4,400 - ~' 4,300 4,200- - - _ 4100 4,000 ..~. ._., .~ .._. ._ - . - - 3,800 - - - - - c i 3.700 ~ _ ,. ~- 3,600 - - - - 3,500 - - - 3400- - - " 3,300 - - - - - k , '? { 3,200 _ _ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ r 3,'100 - - - - - - - t y~ _ - 3,000 - - - - - - - - ~ _ ~ 2900 . - 2.700 ------ r , ~`~- ~ ± r` 2,600 - - - -- -------- y'.~ ~ , X2,500 - -- - -• ---- ~ 2,a00- - - - - - - '.t c 2,300 - - - - - - ~ } ii; R " ~ - - 'a - I -. - - - ~ - ~. _ _ ._. .. . o m 2 200 - E ~ ~ .r'. 1 0 2,100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - _~ `',~ e s ~~ * ~ a ~ ; > ~ 2.D00- > V ,F e a 4 £Mx .: 1.800 - - - - ~ ~~ wa rw ~ z v ~ 4 ~ 1,700 - - - - - - - - ~. ~ ~'~; rf Y~ . r 1600- - - "_ x r-~ ~ ~} ~{ ~~~~_ ~ f y . ~~ -_ _ _ r y ~ r~ r~. ~ f ~.~F~. ~ ..rte _.. 1,400 - - - _ - - - - - - _ _ - - a '}~ ~ ~ i 1 ,~ F '~4r` +r ~"Sd~' ~rk'~, t'"~f r~fa L~^~3 ~. s"~ ~~( }a ., 5 ,. 1,300 - r ," ~ ~r v, - ' z x ~ k ~~ }k.,y,, I ; ~, ~t ''~,~~ `' .ate > 1,2D0- - ---- r r > _ i tir ',taT~ 4~ xM~,.e'"t~X~ ~~ 1~.?~ ,.`` - 1,100 ~ ;~ a ° ~ F-r h:.a~rnJ.fH ik~'~,.~n`-.y+~ r- { E ;" 1.000- - - - - - ~ I •~+~-t y ~~1c ~ ' ,a ` .,~ ±a~_,c~ ,~ `' ~ Yy 5. ~ 3~ Y 'S 900- t ~ A eu ^~~ r .Fi~A }5 "'>. ~~, h~~.'i'~' `sue :~ 800- - - - - r ~ ~ $3 - ` 1,. -e ~,,~ ~ ~ ~ 700 - ~ - h ~ ;~ ] _ 600 ,, ` - - -.: .. r 500 ,wrr ~ ~ t 400 - - - - - ,~ _~ $ ~ ~ i 3 .{+ ~- ~ s k cx X34-'yyS:-. cir~~'u, {~ +- ~ -t~ ~ iv ,F r .. .~' ~v#., &°~°, f 'h ~L•~S .- l ,~. .~ w~4~- yr 300 - ~ ; + ~ ti~ ;r s - ; i ,~' ~~'~e'} ~ ~ -~ , ~ 3 ^F y , 200 - - ~ t ={ a ` ` ~ F ~ ~ ~ „` -~ 100 -i - ° 5. ~~ ~ S~ .r. .. ar , " ,. 0 --------~ .. -_ 0 1 2 3 4 Time (hrs) Total Volume Infiltrated = 4,627 fN _\ v 1 SH~PHARC~'a August 1g, ~Ug9 Ms. P~huang va Clearwater Engineering MS. Via, Please accept this Hate, to verify that a qualified maintenance firm will be hired to provide regular scheduled maintenance on the propased storm water vault as recommended by the manufacturer far our new proposed project an Clearwater beach. Sincerely, ~ Paul Andrews general danger Shephard's beach Resort Paulshephards.com Tree Inventory Shephard's Beach Resort, Inc. Clearwater, Florida Prepared by Alan Mayberry November 23, 2008 For: Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist, and includes findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and my report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of Keith Zayac & Associates and will not be given to other entities unless so directed. Site Overview and Tree Canopy Analysis The subject site is commercial property located on Clearwater Beach. The site consists of a variety of palm species growing in landscape islands within parking lots or in landscape buffers adjacent to parking lots. The species include the native sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) and several exotic palms including the Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta), California fan palm (Washingtonia filifera), Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata), Bottle palm (Hyophorbe lagenicaulis), Coconut palm (Cocos nucifera), Alexandra palm (Archontophoenix alexandrae), Pygmy date palm (Phoenix roebelenii), Royal palm (Roystonea regia -native to South Florida), Queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana), and Foxtail palm (Wodyetia bifurcata). The palms in general have been pruned too hard. Only dead and dying fronds should be removed as the palm recycles nutrients back to the bud from the declining frond. The palms should be fertilized four times a year with a palm special fertilizer from Lesco with a formula of 8-2-12-4 (N,P,K, + Mg) and should be irrigated with an automatic system that targets the needs o f the individual species. With a few exceptions the palms are sufficiently healthy to warrant preservation or transplanting on site. All trees and palms with an overall condition rating of 3.0 and above on the following inventory are considered worthy of preservation or transplanting. Tree Inventory Data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the data used in the inventory: Tree# -location -Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size -Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.). Species -Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. Condition Rating -The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included bark. Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing energy. The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows: 0- A dead tree 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). Atree with a rating of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2 - A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback, cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s) can be .treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating. 3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5 - A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation. 6 - A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree. Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree. NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3-5 years. However, events such as drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely affected, have the tree inspected by a qualified International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist. Note: Whenever possible it is advised to adhere to inventory recommendations when selecting trees to be preserved. For example, trees or palms rated 4.0 and higher should be preserved if at all possible, while trees or palms rated 2.0 and lower should be removed unless otherwise noted in the inventory. Trees or palms rated 2.5 are generally recommended for removal unless remedial work is performed to upgrade them. Trees or palms rated 3.0 and 3.5 are average trees that have good potential and warrant serious consideration for preservation but not to the extent that site plan modifications are necessary. This tree inventory was conducted on November 23, 2008. NOTE #1: The tree survey prepared by the site surveyor identifies several palms that have less than 10' of clear trunk. Palms with less than 10' of clear trunk are not protected by the City of Clearwater code and consequently are not included in the following tree inventory. The palms are identified on the attached site plan with the initials NP (not protected). NOTE #2: The tree survey prepared by the site surveyor identifies several palms that are in landscape buffers of adjacent properties. These palms were not included in the following inventory as their root systems are contained within planters and they will not be affected by future construction activities relative to the subject property. NOTE #3: Trees and palms with a condition rating of 3.0 or greater are considered worthy of preservation or transplanting on site. Trees and palms with a condition rating of less then 3.0 are not recommended for preservation and are followed by a comment section that describes the arboricultural reasons justifying the rating. Tree Inventory Tree # Size Species Rating 1 12' C.T. sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 3.5 2 20' C.T. Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 3.5 3 18' C.T. Washington palm 4.0 4 14' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 5 16' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6 14' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 7 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 NOTE: Palms #8, 9, 10, 11, 34, 35 & 36 are located on the publicly owned right of way of Gulfview Boulevard but were planted by the property owner as a street tree design and as such are included in this tree inventory. 8 10' C.T. foxtail palm (Wodyetia bifurcata) 3.0 9 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 10 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 11 12' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 12 11' C.T. Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata) 3.5 13 9" Seagrape (Coccoloba uvifera) 1.5 Comments: The condition of this tree is downgraded due to the presence two large basal wounds with decay located on the trunk within 2' of the grade. 7' above grade there is a gaping wound where a large branch has been torn from the tree. In addition, the crown is thinning and has dieback present. Recommend removal. 14 30' C.T. .Washington palm 4.5 15 13' C.T. coconut palm (Cocos nucifera) 4.0 16 13' C.T. coconut palm 4.0 17 12' C.T. foxtail palm 2.5 Comments: Nutritional deficiency 18 13' C.T. coconut palm 4.0 19 28' C.T. Washington palm 4.0 20 12' C.T. coconut palm 4.0 21 12' C.T. foxtail palm 1.5 Comments: Severe deficiency 22 10' C.T. coconut palm 3.0 23 30' C.T. Washington palm 4.5 24 40' C.T. Washington palm 4.5 25 14', 17', 18' C.T. Senegal date palm (cluster) 3.5 26 40' C.T. Washington palm 4.5 27 35' C.T. Washington palm 4.5 28 16' C.T. California fan palm (Washingtonia filifera) 4.0 29 16' C.T. royal palm (Roystonea regia) 4.0 30 10' C.T. foxtail palm 2.5 Comments: Nutritional deficiency 31 15' C.T. royal palm 4.0 32 16' C.T. royal palm 4.0 33 10' C.T. Senegal date palm 3.5 34 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.0 35 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 36 11' C.T. foxtail palm 2.0 Comments: Severe nutritional deficiency and over pruned 37 8" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 2.5 Comments: This tree is located 3' south of the sidewalk of Gulfview Boulevard and is growing in a 6' wide landscape buffer between the sidewalk and parking lot. The tree is downgraded due to the presence of a codominant stem with included bark in the main crotch located 4.5' above grade. The codominant stem situation is compounded by the removal of a 4" diameter branch that once formed a tri-dominant formation at this point. The decay resulting from the branch removal will further weaken the affected area. The crown has average live crown ratio and below average form due to excessive pruning and competition from adjacent plants. Recommend removal. 38 17' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 39 15' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 40 12' C.T. coconut palm 3.5 41 12' C.T. coconut palm 3.5 42 10' C.T. coconut palm 3.0 43. 11' C.T. coconut palm 3.5 44. 10' C.T. coconut palm 4.0 45. 10' C.T. coconut palm 3.0 46 28' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 47 11 C.T. foxtail palm 3.0 48 11' C.T. foxtail palm 2.5 Comments : Nutritional deficiency 49 11' C.T. foxtail palm 2.5 Comments : Nutritional deficiency 50 11' C.T. foxtail palm 2.5 Comments : Nutritional deficiency 51 11' C.T. foxtail palm 2.5 Comments : Nutritional deficiency 52 16' C.T. queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 3.0 53 18' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 54 16' C.T. queen palm 3.0 55 15' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 56 14' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 57 16' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 58 27' C.T. coconut palm 5.0 59 24' C.T. Washington palm 4.0 ~,pSG APPROXIMA IE fL 000 ZL)NE LINE PER MAP (/)PICA[) 3 w S' a LY~IF ~ ~~P G~Mir ~ l11' A.:9~ ~ydT"P<'~ ad~~e :o c+/A ', ~.a+~Y P~~t~ M'' . df W BOULEVARp i~ KEITH ZAYAC A ASSOCIATES, INC. ()Z)) )9f-9tBt Ae4nsW SITE PLAN ~~, 1 toga ~~, f~~ E F~~o gp5 ~PSf.GpQ-ryopa a\ y GP~'yo CPp~~ ~P~G v)PZ~.° 0 ~ ~ :~ BGLE: itgry UMPNIG SCALE V 1 e~P OG~ a"' h SGOO E~ f- ,Ac ix°' --- ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY C4 _ 4 -~~ M --_ 9B ~99~eg X88-b~ Q .e a H m ~^ V O ~ ~'' v ~^4 APPROXIMATE FL000 ZONE LINE PER MAP (TWICALJ sn Xr~TM o,.eX~ . uY ~ARD (aXTXu - -v `+~~ ~\ t, ~Z _: ~~ (~` ~~~` ~. C ~f.a \ \\ 1 l ` ' f ~ \ ``` ~\ r. .C \ T /~~~ =P( §CA ~ M1 ~~~ ~ 3 ~ M1+ a ~ p_~..A~\ ~~~ ~O~Q Ems' ~ ~ ` 6% G~SEF~ o~~ `~+\ 0P \` ~t r~ ' ~~y~ 1~SS ~teV ~' ~ t} ~ obi `\ ~ Q~4Y ~ ` ~ ~ -.~ ~ _ ~ //~~gg~~ ~~ ~ tiC ~ ~ ~ \ ~~ ~' e° 8 \~ ~ ~ c~ -v ----=-Tv- `g i .~.~~ 6 emu" ~ t ~~ ca«m rXOVrm ~ mi¢ m oow,o' Y ~vti ~~ ; sy„ -o ~ t~~ ~,,~ ~ ` /~N ~n \ ~/~ /~~ ~i, ~lJ ` y`~ * i / t qsY' ~ ~ a ` 4 oJ~' ~ ~ i t V E ~ ~ . /, / I.C~ ~ •'~ 1~ -~ -- --- - - aCAtE:ri yp• fWANMC ~61lE a m-o-m-av ,~ .~` -f- ~~ : a u was a % . ~`... 0.FOFVlAIEft RQdOA KEITH ZAYAC k ASSOCIATeS, INC. (nv1 ova-uses f.Ven XAU,~~RfW ~ )4~~ __ q ~.[i~i; i~ rf 7k_ t;~'~P.. ''''-''''' .~ s - y~. v y\\ s^ 1 RAY U ~ ~~ `~ \ CY'~ ~~ -- -. - EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL 91EET nnc ,pt"' ~ ~ ~~ ~~ , ~®~~ PROPOSED PLANT LI5T LANDSCAPE PLAN ~ y,X ~c i m r~Xda m.msse rte- ~ ~~ P ~ ~ m wrnTx ~tl1°~ sET not rXaccr PHAS XOT LUi Yp' w~xrwY x CQISIMICIIp4 J09 N6 0l20 gUMN 9T: .M ,,(~ QV"f ! ~ wart. ~ '-oOQMi'"~ rr rre Te OAIF W/O?/OB OIEIXEP. Xfi F ~ P 0 e °'°'°•'°~ """'° I C10 I e °"°'°'°"'°" "'"° ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY ~ ! O~~i ~ { ~P ~~E 65v y OQ- ~O o ~ ~ 9 EG~~~Oi ~~ ~ ,~ -o c"' } ~ i i... i ~ V 14f-I F MECRArvICnt .QI IN-II~i:il~l'~a Nnvn1 _..- _ ~a~ C PD)•-1a• - m ~, $ ~ IoE.n;EVeL ~.~ xemx( uMlr rvnvD1 _ _ ~ _ ___ - _ - iLEVEL In -- 'r sra. ' O .h IOUI'LlVEL _ 9 `- $r~L¢VEL ' _ c ~ G T.P_ 0 i I A - E BOD LEVEL _... ', ~' 6i' U` - a d i100LEVEL ~ ~~. '. Z ) ~3~ ' -.... - ~ ~ HEIG LIMIt u ~ ~ v NIn LEVEL __ i xa r ~m LEVEL _ ~~ ', vp LEVEL v1 I F __ m', ~~pppnrmr V'~d.tN't~l~ I n~ _ OROUrvD LEVEL - _ PROMI'i I.D\t Q ~!~' _ L-_--_ _ RCMUV 1: 1:%IS"fING CUWk,A AIIDV f STAIRW ELL, PRUM)SED DESIGN SHALL (URRL•LATE W ITH NEW TOWER E%ISTHVG NOTEL 1 , e 1 Q NOTE: % OF OPENINGS OR ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS ON ''I LEGEND - - 1 ^ ELEVATION DRAWINGS _____ _ V E O ' _ wlrt succo r.mi. nx+t'ul ^9 aurtx nnnrr<siscx[«HC wxxsam , LE ATI N OPENINGS ARCIIITF.C TURAL TOTAL ELEMENTS - ~ rtoau[auv wwvm Rawaausooanw I .avwEEnNiafrtxR wEST ITV - ilY. -isw " - - --- IG ,,aa NORTH IS% JI°i. fil'h EAST 78°/ IK 77. II 3 ' AeKt HLStA`D.RCnC9Pn Ac.Aavw mrzo uu~ LJI e Q _ SOUTH 19Y. IW 6Ub. IL4 ' uurvxun,wo aum ssrcrsasrurtcaiaic a~tr~ma.EOnaronarAOE mtutE Easue 11 ( aR~N ~ i \~ `~ ~ 4 ~ - -L 'I , ^ ~ 0 w,a~wN„,aR.N~1, ~ 0 _ L= I ~~~,~w~,N~ ~Iru wrt almrwa~ cwarrasxmm 0 ~.D~~D,DMW~ET~EAE " f - - - -------- BALCONIES OFFSET h',~.wMMID~NtoEDnw~arDxn Is vxE..aMlwaoDR ~ ~ FROM FLOORS I 1 `-' 'ITHRU 12 , - - ExlsrlxceoTELHEVOxD g ~ 9 ~ ALUMINUM LOUVERED AWNING REMUVE E%ISTING CUPOLA SYSTEM OVER E%ISTING ABUVE STAIRWF.LI., PROPOSED r PARKING STRUCTURE FACADE DESII:N SHALL CORRELATE I - _~ WITH NEW TOWER I~ 14 ' ~ N SILL ~ 1 I L.T _, I ~ i _:. .c . .. ~ III r I -. I ,5alk- ~ R ~• If. -_-_. _ I _ I.. ~ `'S~-~ 'Ted ~_.. _ ~ I fh-~: _ J Y i 3 n ' w I ~F ~"'T~Y+•"~ ~ 1 _ - 16,_l. W -_ - ~ _ y PROPCTSm A`RWLTRTTFAN CE ;~ EXISTING PARKING GARAGE _ n I NOR - 1lncxr L~Mrt _ r ~~ - ~ tOP OF ROOF ,$F -,', -- ~_ A.~ ~'. ~ _ y NU LEVEL. PoOI DELI ^ ( z _ ~~- NILMMII. LEVEL • AM d T~ _ 9 „1 - A a _ Q~a~vvlmt ~ vlol•rEVr __ NAVO) i BALCONIES OFFSET R~' fl TF I I ' ~. LEVEL ~ ~ = FROM FLOORS 11 ~ LL THRU12 in _ - ~ oW LEVEL F _ G G -~.. E :" Vi:x V m °. ,y B00 LEVEL V . ~ _ ~ G r 5 •-. e - _ _ Q ~ ' ~~..~ r,., ___-. ~. ~*ttq LEVt:L m y11EIGHT IAMIT o~ LEVEL ~r.,r..l-ri~NA,~, .~ _ - .» w . ~ I I~/~~I ~'~ - 5 - y , ~. ' - •.i t00 LEVl.I. I' ,F ~ ~- IEVEI. ~.~.11N~ SHEPFIARDS BEACH RESORT QEAR WNHE ROI~\ PiBIV®EOR: v~m ~w.Aaw~ ~~ CONYRiAN15: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT : AI AM~90W V.R. ]HF aM ~NM'aCI1.A~ ]9Wf CML ENGINEER: ~: vzn n>oe~n '696 can^cr. ~MUVAc STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: A~rn REV ~ T o1A6' oFC CnM.BIx SHEET l01E: NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATION -COLOR SET IIIIE: D11C lA~ITAI NOT TOR OOWIRVC'IION JO! NO: OR70 DRAWN M: G I SN OAIE: 17.07.200! CIEC1031: 016 A-20 REMOVE E%ISTBJG CUPOLA ABO\'E STAIRw'E11, PROPOSED DESIGN SMALL CORRELATE w'ITN N'!N' TONT0. h LEGEND ' L~ xxooM wmr RUCCOns~.m+s.u ~ oomr xnK xna x:nrln.lc w.a mwM xM s vF.asuxr.w¢N6Gn6 WCx6 vY w~ w~mrto~x4F awncrvsiuA Sd2woxt ^ Muwar wnocum nar<t nFmMTGMw 4 \M~/ Q C~' nwRO BUtttlDeHwxtoW~9 u vtov.2em xouvwxniu Dorn T ^ uMlw lomtao 4w»wamrM 6 ~+ 1D fC®wu r/NFVrtwoe~twarnflulM(wn ] svE~ en.VOF n~NU nawaMl ~ 12 ~'~xoric~u wlexeso¢xtoeuss i~ wwm wN\xnwwC[/fMaF rton 14 cavcxrt catoay~en sioicnsn 15 ow9FJDrtw coon LJ -. ALUMINUM LOL'VEREO AWNING SYSTEM OVER o-- ' f%ISTIN(i PnRKING STRUCRIPr P 1CADE . , HOrEL 1 REMOVE F.%ISTING CUM ' Fl'T41 ~ ABGVE SI'41RW1'.LL.xPR( rRl>Ix\srD Nrw rN~rRnNCr I. %IST IN(i IIOTI'~l. WIN(. L~- N%IS'!IN<i 1'ARAING tiARA(iE ' Q -. -- EAST ELEVATION /SECTION ' .. L"J 14 . '{~ _ `-. , NOTE: °io OF OPENINGS OR ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS ON I ~~' ~ °' ' - ~ ~~ :ELEVATION DRAWINGS ~L ~ PROPOSED HOTEL BEYOND e:'~'L`o+~~'~+~=~. ®, _ ~ I /,/ ~~,T SI~FUIRD'S BEACH RESORT COiW NMl&, ROro~ /R9KED Fpl: Mw ~wrimMUd.0.de...U)m om~oamuwwru.x C'CMI9ATANIS: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: a' ~:1 ~xNU~ ",o, CML ENGINEER: .cacaam~,.c. x,re.n.meral..un.w A sranxxsoR RO M ].ws ~[:I>Zn nawep STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: rm'6°°i a . . n m axA xprE:lneq~im ww w.i owlamo one mwe~rs s o>.m~ pc cawa~n 91EET TIIE: EAST & WEST EXISTING ELEV/SECT -COLOR aErnnE: oRCaeerlrK rar roR coramuclan JOl NO: 0120 OfANN M: G/IX W1F: 12.01.200! CIECIRD: ORi A-22 S Q O z 0 z H .~ H 0 z 0 H -7 i 11 ~~ I a }~ 7~~ ~ m~ g ~ g g a (7 ~ ~~~-~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ p as ~~ ~ ~€ ~ ~~~ ~ 1 3 5 ~ ge g~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ' y ~ R~ m h~ V~ ~~ a ~ S ~5~ Z a ~ 1 m ~~Ts JO ~~Tf~ ~A% ! ~ ;~ ` ~ i ~~ VIEW OF POOL DECK v¢w of mc[ enns ~~~~~~~ sHErwums BENCH RESORT ~~. rc~,vartD roc: ,,b, - ~,~ ~N„~ ~~~ ,~: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: ics~vocwm.c ~:~ °~ ~ . »wca .o :inn ns9eee CML ENGINEER: roe 'xn~ro~nru. v~iE.w vr~rvxvwx now~~evs ~: inn rva wee STRUCIURALENGINEER: avw ~ ~: pen.~mr REV w.. awimw ac rn+we+m we wrw.em ~.~I:oavAw we maam 91EEf 11RE: RENDERINGS-2 sn mu: occ as~mK raI roc coNSicocnoH .~ ~ oszo oc~wn er u i eH wrt: Iz.ol.zaoe occ~: ow A-31