FLD2009-09035 - 109 Mcmullen Booth Rd S - Patio Homes By The BayFLD2009-09035
109 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
PATIO HOMES BY THE BAY
PLANNER OF RECORD: MJJ
ATLAS # 292A
ZONING: LMDR
LAND USE: RU
RECEIVED
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS
09/01 /2009
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
CLW CoverSheet
CDB Meeting Date: November 17, 2009
Case Numbers: FLD2009-09035/PLT2009-00002
Agenda Item: D.7.
Owner/Applicant: Agostino DiGiovanni for Patio Homes
Representative: Ronald Letize
Address: 109 S McMullen Booth Road
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit four attached dwellings in the
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District, as a Residential
Infill Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code
(CDC) Section 2-204.E.; and Preliminary Plat approval fora 4-lot
subdivision for attached dwellings.
CURRENT ZONING: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
CURRENT FUTURE LAND Residential Urban (RU)
USE CATEGORY:
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant
Proposed Use: 4-lot subdivision for attached dwellings
EXISTING North: Pinellas County
SURROUNDING ZONING Detached Dwellings
AND USES: South: Mobile Home Park (MHP) District
Detached Dwellings
East: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District
Detached Dwellings
West: Office (O) District and Pinellas County
Detached Dwellings and Educational Facilities
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.595 acres is located at the southeast corner of McMullen Booth Road and John's Parkway. The
property was previously developed with a detached dwelling which has been demolished and the site is
now vacant.
The properties to the north within the City are zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
and are developed with detached and attached dwellings. Properties to the west within the City are zoned
Office (O) District and are developed with educational facilities uses. Properties to the south are zoned
Mobile Home Park (MHP) District and are developed with a mobile home park. Properties to the east is
zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and are developed with detached dwellings.
Community Development Boazd-November 17, 2009
FLD2009-09035/ PLT2009-00002 -Page 1 of 5
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to redevelop the subject property with a 4-lot subdivision containing four attached
dwellings, one on each of the four lots, through the Residential Infill Project process. Attached dwellings
are permitted in the LMDR District through a Flexible Standard Development or Flexible Development
application contingent that the parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and vacant on the date of
adoption of the Code. While the subject property is a corner lot, it was developed with a detached
dwelling at the date of adoption of the Code. Therefore, approval through the Residential Infill
Development process is necessary.
Public sidewalks will be constructed on the south side of John's Parkway within easements. Existing
water and sewer lines are located within the proposed private street right-of--way and aright-of--way
easement will be granted to the City for access to these facilities. All four of the lots will take driveway
access from John's Parkway.
The redevelopment of this property with attached dwellings will be consistent with the majority of the
surrounding development, which are primarily detached and attached dwellings. The attached dwellings
will be compatible with the surrounding developed character and represent an upgrade from the existing
vacant lot conditions.
The Preliminary Plat for this subdivision complies with the design standards of the Community
Development Code. A Final Plat will be required to be approved and accepted by City Council prior to
recording in the public records.
Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2-201.1, within
the Residential Urban (RU) land use category, the allowable I.S.R is 0.65. The site is in compliance as
an I.S.R of 0.42 is proposed.
Densi :Pursuant to CDC Section 2-201.1, within the Residential Urban (RU) land use category, the
allowable density is 7.5 units per acre. As the lot area is 25,931 square feet/ 0.595 acres, four dwelling
units are allowed and therefore, the four proposed dwelling units are in compliance.
Minimum Lot Area: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects, there is no
minimum lot area. The aggregate proposed lot area for the four proposed lots is 25,931 square feet which
meets the attached dwelling flexible standard development standard of 5,000 square feet found in Table
2-203.
Minimum Lot Width: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects, there is no
minimum lot width. The aggregate proposed lot width for the four proposed lots is 185.80 feet which
meets the attached dwelling flexible standard development standard of 100 feet found in Table 2-203.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill Projects, the minimum
setbacks in the LMDR District are 25-foot front, five-foot side and 15-foot rear. As the property fronts
two rights of way, (McMullen Booth Road to the west and John's Parkway to the north), the property has
two front and two side setbacks. The proposal includes a front (north) setback of 25 feet, a front (west)
setback of 29 feet, a side (south) setback of 32.3 feet and a side (east) setback of 18.5 feet and is
therefore compliant with the above referenced requirements.
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill projects, the
maximum building height in the LMDR District is 30 feet. The proposed building height of the attached
dwellings will maintain a maximum building height of 13.1 feet as measured to mean roof height, which
is consistent with the LMDR District standards.
Community Development Boazd-November 17, 2009
FLD2009-09035/ PLT2009-00002 -Page 2 of 5
Minimum Off-Street Parkin: Two parking spaces are required for attached dwellings in the LMDR
District. The proposal is to provide two parking spaces for each dwelling, which is consistent with Code
requirements. Furthermore, and pursuant to Section 3-1402.C, only detached dwellings may have back-
out parking into rights-of--way. The driveways have been designed as to allow vehicles to have turning
capability within each driveway as to enter the John's Parkway in a forward motion.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, air conditioning and similar mechanical
equipment is exempt from the side and rear setback requirements, but such equipment must be screened
from view from streets and adjacent property. Outside condensing units for air conditioners will be
placed adjacent to the side of the dwellings. Screening requirements will be reviewed during the building
permit process.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1908.A, all utility facilities, including but not limited to gas, water,
wastewater collection, electric, telephone and television cables, except major transmission lines and
transformers, shall be located underground. This proposal will comply with this requirement.
Solid Waste: Each dwelling will be provided a black barrel for solid waste disposal. The applicant has
indicated these black barrels will be stored exterior to the dwelling. CDC Section 3-201.D.1 requires
these black barrels to be screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. Provisions for walls,
fences or other appropriate screening materials will be reviewed during the building permit process.
Sianage: There are presently no proposed subdivision signs for this property. Should any such signs be
desired, appropriate provisions in the Sign Code must be met.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the
subject property.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency
of the detached dwelling subdivision proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-201.1 and 2-204:
Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent
Densi 7.5 du/acre 6.71 du/acre X
I.S.R. 0.65 0.42 X
Minimum N/A Four lots totaling 25,931 square X'
Lot Area feet
Minimum N/A Four lots totaling 185.80 feet X'
Lot Width (measured at the front setback
line
Minimum Front: 10 - 25 feet North: 25 Feet X
Setbacks West: 29 Feet
Side: 0 - 5 feet South: 32.3 X
East: 18.5
Rear: 0 - I 0 feet N/A N/A
Maximum 30 13.1 feet X
Hei ht
Minimum Two spaces per dwelling unit Two spaces per dwelling unit X
Off-Street Parkin
~ See analysis in Staff Report
Community Development Board- November 17, 2009
FLD2009-09035/ PLT2009-00002 -Page 3 of 5
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of
the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-204.E (Residential Infill
Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following:
intensity or other development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access X
or other development standards aze justified by the benefits to community character
and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level
Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and chazacter of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adiacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its
meetings of October 1, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move
forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and
conclusions of law:
Findings of Fact: The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and
requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to
support the following findings of fact:
1. The 0.595 acres is located at the southeast corner of McMullen Booth Road and John's Parkway;
2. The property was developed with a detached dwelling until 2008, which has been demolished and the
site is now vacant;
3. The proposal is to redevelop the subject property with a 4-lot subdivision for attached dwellings;
Community Development Board- November 17, 2009
FLD2009-09035/ PLT2009-00002 -Page 4 of 5
4. The LMDR District standards require developing attached dwellings on land not vacant at the
adoption of the current code be approved through a Residential Infill Project application;
5. The proposal includes four lots with an aggregate lot area of 25,931 square feet and an aggregate lot
width (measured at the front setback line) of 185.80 feet; and
6. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law: The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the
following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-201.1 and 2-204 of
the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-204.E of the
Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as
per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the requirements for Preliminary Plats in Sections
4-704, 4-705 and 4-709 of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development
approval to permit four attached dwellings in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District, as
a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-204.E.; and Preliminary Plat approval for a
4-lot subdivision for attached dwellings with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the dwellings be consistent with the elevations approved by
the CDB;
2. That black barrels stored exterior to the dwellings and outdoor mechanical equipment including air
conditioning equipment be screened from view from adjacent streets and properties; and
3. That all utility facilities, including but not limited to gas, water, wastewater collection, electric,
telephone and television cables, except major transmission lines and transformers, shall be located
underground, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff: ~
Matt Ja ~ n, Planner II
ATTACHMENTS:
^ Location Map
^ Aerial Map
^ Zoning Map
^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map
^ Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S:\Planning DepartmenftC D B~FLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicationsuvlcMullen Booth S 0109 -Patio Homes by the Bay
(LMDR) -2009.11 -Approved - MJJ\Staff Report 11.17.2009.doc
Community Development Boazd-November 17, 2009
FLD2009-09035/ PLT2009-00002 -Page 5 of 5
Matthew Jackson
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727)562-4836
matthew. i ackson(a~myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
^ Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 2008 to Present
Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and
variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of
development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning
assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning
ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review
committees, boards, and meetings.
^ Planner I
Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007
Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances.
In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained
submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedu le and lead
project kick-off meetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting
documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject
matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs.
Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made
disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities.
^ Manager
Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004
Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment
complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and
inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and
delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing
and special events.
^ Linguist
US Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995
Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military
readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering
operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian
authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison
between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training.
EDUCATION
^ Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007
^ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004
-. ..::.r - . •~rr.:3 A
4:~:::~~~ ~~.,
BAY LA
.._..~._. F.
L.' ~•}'` ~ ~ d ~.
~:' :~;:~:: I PROJECT
~~'~~~ ~ S/TE
U1e ~~',rr,.~ n.r~. U
~
VIRGlNlA -;AVE
~';:':;:.. ~;: m
~J
~ ¢ ~ k ~ ~
~
r`~
O
L/ ~ :. }
..t~:':::::'' ~ ~ :~~' ' :~ STREET Q
.;F ..
...... -.
m
,.
~
g ~
i= ~ ~ :~ .~
1:~::: °T::.
r_l+-.ass. rCardina w Q
a~^m
GULF-TO -BAY BLVD
~~
-T---,.r,.,_.,__,
.~..-~.
.., -
,,,.. _
~~;:.
.;
t•~-
~.
.~~r
•'
~
•
~
~
-
-
>
. -
.•.1 -
=~;:;
* -
) -
_
.
.r.
:~;::'
~~'' - - -
: ~~ -
G - -
~~ -
E~:' -
- -r'
~~~; ~ a - -
m a.
`~ __
•
~
t _
A~
_• -
k~:`~~ -
F' - - [
': ('
t:'
ire
•~t _ .
!':.'..•
'•.~
:
t
Ei• - - - -- - - -
.1 - -
t•j
-.
!: ='': - _
~; - - - - -
.....
::
..-•
- .'~ -
.....:..
...
. ;:..:..
.._,;
:, ..
•:;-
., ..-
'' - - - - -
c~-
- -
.
~.. - -
LOCATION
Owner: Agostino DiGiovanni Case: FLD2009-09035
P LT2009-00002
.Site: 109 S McMullen Booth Property Size: 0.77 Acres
PIN: 16-29-16-00000-240-0200 Atlas Page: 292A
- - 11 30
- z9
-
~ ~ za
_
b ~
35 z7
.;;~':::. ~~
' •::: ~ ~:: ~' 2
.
.
_ 6,9 C
~ ? o
z
:.1 ss9.os za g
- -
23 Y T
;
-
:,~
r:::•96P:~.:::•:::;:::
os 1.37 /
::~••/ sss
_
.
,
I ~' `~ s `~
-_ - - -- .'+~ A OYSTER A WAY _ - ~ ,
~'
+ a s
O
- _ _ u
^ N 31352 ,
~- - _
,L. •
~s ~ se
3133,
• °.-.
`vh
~~ ''i = ~ o : ri-~~
h ~
I
?
.
i
n 3131u
04902
~ ; 0.-. -. M
.•. ?!:;. 31 GaESNn
iO
GaE
QAYOU
~ ~
~
•
.
_
~
,
_ 3
~ ,- ~ r.. rn 31289 ,
'~~'
-~ _
c
:
-
~
'
312716 I CONSERVATION,
;7j
1 ;;
;';;~
• s zr
'-•-•~~
'~~
•
'•':,•'•••
,"
~ `
l
:
:
•
•
,a
ENVIRONMENTAL,
7
~ la ,: ,z is is -~'~ ,~ 31257
'
-
'
`
:
:
~
'
.
: ~:
~ h
Y~-
:~:•r':
:::i7d::i:•:
v::
~.:I
O ~ :. ::.: .CD•:'.: •..:..:':•: •: :.•_:.. k:•• 6P 5~z dViG , ANO DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
• • •~' ~
~
' E6MT
•~.
75 M M - ~ _ .••-13![51:. •; •.:::' :. I.jp'Q~.. I
+: ~-. ~ ~
,oo
_ - _ - ~.
... :.• •:.. :.'igo--::.: - -t'.160'~•'.•r::
:+i.
_ -
: kiwi DVi~ II ~1, M ~~~:~-
z„ D ~~~
-
Educational 109
Facilities ~ - -I ,Z^°~6>
15 ~ 83843
L
~
~ 123
-•
MHP
~
0
m , zao~S,
8 I .::::.
~° ~ 1 ; ? ~ to ~~ . ~• ~ ~ . W i gsN ': ~''•e.:.':.- 9 e 7 6
sS1-s
2410 :•
20 19 118
17
16 115
~
~
~;;
1
1
:::
1 J ~.:::•:::~.:::i::':3'.-:.:'::': -::{
..:•,'..
=:- •::''~'~-:-::'•. :•:
•
.
I :~.'1 g
'.~::• ::; .1~:::i `•-'.4fi~: ~ : {~~•-:ii; ' -a4•!:{ - ' 11 10
~
~ - I
I ~
-
- 213
219 225
8
231
z„ 205
':.:i
227
211 217 223
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Owner: Agostino DiGiovanni Case: FLD2009-09035
PLT2009-00002
Site: 109 S McMullen Booth Property Size: 0.77 Acres
PIN: 16-29-16-00000-240-0200 Atlas Page: 292A
-~-,~'~ y y ~ r
~ ~' -
a . .~
.; j
~
*
,i
r ,
t
5
y ~ ~ ~~'~' ,
N
• J ',
.
'S.~~ R ~
.
~j~~t',~~\~\~ ~(,i ~ ~~
~ 1 rr 4 ' ~1 ~ ~ k 1' `~ f~q ^~ ~ ~r3r~x3~"~'"~ ~~, ~t .
F t ~
~~
~ ~ _
, ~
j I~ w
ref (
F 4T ~ ~ ~ i
~~ - A ~,}~ l~
r,~. t~1~' .}
~ `r. ~.~ ~.. i JM1.~ r -.~...,`~ R ~,
^. ~
"y~MF
i .~.
( ~ ' ,~•~~ ~• ter: ~ ~ ~~ .~
~ ' ~
„. `~
~yN..7^^7~~,,,, ~~I
,~
a~
AERIAL
Owner: Agostino DiGiovanni Case: FLD2009-09035
PLT2009-00002
Site: 109 S McMullen Booth Property Size: 0.77 Acres
PIN: 16-29-16-00000-240-0200 Atlas Page: 292A
.~~
View from northwest corner of property looking south
View from southwest property line looking east
109 S McMullen Booth Road
FLD2009-009035
View from northwest property line looking northeast
View from northwest corner of property looking south
View from southwest property line looking northeast
~~:~'.! a
Northside
<A
~:,~sc~eaer3v~t'atc~r'- as~,~;rct`ed^.~~z, ~lcrc;.
October 13, 2009
Mr. Matthew Jackson
Planner II
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, #210
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE: FLD2009-09035 and PLT2009-00002
109 S. McMullen Booth Road
Response to DRC Comments/Conditions
NBS# 91.9
Dear Mr. Jackson:
~g~~: ii'ia'' 8~., •
~, ~u?b il^=1 ifs ~'~' Rs.~~. G'~8 V~6! il~~~l d"i. •
The following information is provided in response DRC Comments dated September 2009.
FLD2009-09035
ENGINEERING
(Prior to Issuance of Building Permit)
1. Sanitary sewer main extension from manhole shall be constructed with four laterals for the
proposed townhome units. Laterals shall be constructed with cleanouts in the right-of--way
per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #305, "Street Lateral".
2. Separate connection and water meters shall be provided to each housing unit proposed via
connections to the existing 6-inch water main that runs along the north side of John's
Parkway to McMullen Booth Road. (this is shown on the plans as a 3-inch water main).
NES Response: Items 1. and 2. will be provided/accomplished prior to issuance of building
permit. 6-inch water main is shown on plans in lieu of previous 3-inch water main.
3. Applicant shall obtain aright-of--way utilization permit from Pinellas County to make
stormwater connection in McMullen Booth Road. (C.R. 611)
NES Response: Stormwater connection no longer being provided to McMullen Booth Road;
utilization permit not required.
4. Please note reclaimed water is available to the site for irrigation.
NES Response: Acknowledged.
5. Provide an approved copy of the D.E.P. application. of the sanitary sewer main extension or
provide evidence that a permit is not required.
NES Response: Acknowledged.
(Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy)
1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a State of
Florida Registered Professional Engineer. The Construction Services Inspector will field
inspect as-built drawings for accuracy.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for the Building Permit Review; additional
comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
NES Response: Acknowledged.
FIRE CONDITION
(Prior to CDB acknowledge)
1. Fire Hydrant will be needed as you enter John's Parkway at McMullen for a forward hose
lay.
NES Response: Please see plan which identifies two existing hydrants (one just south of the site
along McMullen Booth and a second one at the northeast corner of our site along John's Parkway). As
per our discussion the plan provides a distance between hydrants and hose/truck plan with dimensions.
The plan appears to meet the distance requirements.
LAND RESOURCES
1. Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets prior to CDB.
NES Response: Please see revised plan sheets, canopies of all trees on site (to remain) provided
on all plan sheets.
2. Show to be removed all #2 or below rated trees prior to CDB.
NES Response: Please see revised plans, all trees rated #2 or below shown to be removed as per
your request.
2
3. Revise grade changes at tree #l, insure no grade cuts under the canopy. Revised prior to
CDB.
NES Response: Please see new grading plan which was revised to provide no additional grade
cuts under tree # 1 for ponds or swales.
4. Attempt to preserve tree #8 if redesign is necessary to meet other departments' requirements
as this is the best tree on site. Revise prior to CDB.
NES Response: Unfortunately, due to the central location of tree #8 within the lot frontage along
John's Parkway preservation is not possible. Tree #1 will be preserved and is quite large, beautiful and
has been rated a 4.0.
5. Provide Tree Preservation Plan prior to building permit.
NES Response: Tree Preservation Plan will be provided prior to issuance of Building Permit.
PARKS AND RECREATION
1. Site data table needs to be corrected to add the number of previous residential units and the
proposed number of residential units.
NES Response: Please see revised site data table which indicates One (1) Dwelling Unit
previously on site and Four (4) proposed Dwelling Units on site. We acknowledge the recreation
facility impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable)
whichever occurs first.
STORM~VATER (P-rior to Community Development Soard)
1. The FFE of the unit on the west side is lower than the elevation of the crown of the
roadway. The minimum floor elevation for new buildings shall be one foot above the
crown of the pavement abutting the building site for the lowest floor.
NES Response: Please see revised and corrected grading plan meeting the minimum floor
elevations.
2. The spot elevations surrounding the unit on the west side show the proposed ground
elevations higher than the FFE. Please revise.
NES Response: Please see revised and. corrected grading plan.
3. The spot elevation of the patio/entrance of the unit on the east side is 23.0'. That is 2'
higher than the FFE. Please revise.
NES Response: Please see revised and corrected grading plan.
3
4. Provide the invert elevation of the existing 18" RCP at the proposed Type ".P" manhole.......
NES Response: Please see revised drainage plan, we are no longer connecting to the manhole in
question.
5. Provide cross sections of the proposed pond.
NES Response: Please see provided cross sections as per your request.
6. Clearly show how the roof run-off from the east side of the unit will be directed toward the
pond. From the information provided, it appears it will flow across the property to the east.
NES Response: Roof run-off will be captured within roof drains and directed to the pond.
(Prior to Issuance of Building Permit)
1. Provide a copy of the SWFWMD ERP
NES Response: Acknowledged, SWFWMD permit will be provided upon receipt and prior to
issuance of building permit.
2. Provide a copy of the approved Pinellas County permit for the drainage connection.
NES Response: Drainage has been redesigned and will no longer be connected to the Pinellas
County System (invert elevation too high to accept this site) and therefore Pinellas County Drainage
Connection Permit will not be required.
SOLID WASTE
1. Black Barrels must be screened from street with within the garage (3'x 3') footprint or in
the side of each unit and screened from. view. .
NES Response: Please see new concrete pads with connecting sidewalk on the sides of each unit
to accommodate the black barrels with screening via landscape and the porches.
ZONING
1. No off street parking space shall be designed so that a vehicle is required to back into a
public right-of--way.
NES Response: As per discussions with Robert Tefft, Steve Doherty and Scott Rice, please see
revised plan which provides back up pads for each unit.
4
a
2. The setbacks vary throughout the site data table, site plan, preliminary plat and landscape
plans. Correct and revise drawings.
NES Response: Please see revised/corrected information regarding setbacks on all documents;
plans have been coordinated.
PLT2009-00002
ENGINEERING
Items 1-4 accomplished; please see revised Preliminary Plat
1. Property Owners Name
2. Section/Township/Range
3. Date Prepared
4. Drainage Easement
PARKS & RECREATION
Acknowledged, please see revised site data table with Previous and Proposed number of dwelling units
indicated (One (1) Previous -Four (4) Proposed)
ZONING
Redesign not required; comment no longer applicable.
Thank for the opportunity to address these outstanding issues; I trust that this information will be
sufficient to allow the project to move forward to CDB. However, should you require additional
information or clarification, please contact me and I will respond immediately to any outstanding
concerns or questions you may have.
Sincerely, ,~-
r
_r
Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner
cc: NES file 919
5
.`
:", ~~~~~~~ Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
,; `R ~ ,-~..f~~-~~~ Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
1,205.00
^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
Agostino DiGiovanni
2245 McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, FL 33759
727-656-8972v_~__..--_--.-~-.. FAX NUMBER: 727-797-8928
~7 2 7- 6 5 6- 4 8 6 3 .~ -~-_--_~~.~- EMAIL: _~ __.._________-_
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
~3JL~i~3~L ~L VrY`~i~~~~~LA~I 1 t~1~1~L1C~ 11'lll\T
Residential InPill Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
Agostino DiGiovanni
Ronald Letize
_....
1928 Valencia Way, Clearwater, FL 33764
727-797-8972 FAX NUMBER: 727-797-8928
727-443-1143 __-~-_-_ EMAIL: ronletize@tampabay.rr.com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAf~AE:
STREET ADDRESS
PARCEL NUMBER(S):
PARCEL SIZE (acres):
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Patio Homes by the Bay
109 McMullen Booth Road
16-29-16-00000-240-0200
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
PROJECT VALUATION: ~ 650,000.00
0.595 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 25 , 931 (after dedication) I
See Exhibit 'A".Legal Description
PROPOSED USE(S): Attached Dwellings
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Razed existing single family residence - Proposing to construct four (4
Specifically identify the request attached dwellings in association with Preliminary Plat approval as a
~ (include number of units or square - -----___ . -_-._._.-_ .. ._._ . ...-_..___ _. __._.__.-_.__.-- ....___...._..-.-_____ _ .__......._.. ...-.-__. _.__..__....
footage of non-residential use and all Residential Infill Project.
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of ----------------------------------------------------______-..--------__-----.__-..-_-_--
parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
C:\Documents and Settings\derekfergusonlDesk(op\planning dept forms 0708\Residenlial Will Project (FI_D) 2008 07-11.doc
Page I of8
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGI-ITS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIF_D) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
fad SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP
(see page 7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
(~ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which
it is located.
Coo Att an h nd N a r r a t i r_re ----------- ~._..-__~..~.-._~-.~~..----~.-~,_..~-______.......______._._
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
See Attached Narrative __ ~_ ~~___T__~____~,_,~_____~ `-.__~__~ --
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
-___,~_ ~-~- ------
See Attached Narrative
_ ~~ ~___
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
See Attached Narrative _ __~~~__._,_-,~
5. The proposed development is consistent ~.:ith the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See Attached Narrative ___-_,_T--_ _- -__~~_
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
See Attached Narrative
Q\Documenls and Sellings\derek.fergusonlDesklop\planning dept forms 0708\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Pagc 2 of 3
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria)
^ Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
See Attached Narrative
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
See Attached Narrative
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
See Attached Narrative
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
See Attached Narrative
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infll project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
See Attached Narrative __~
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that erihances the community character of the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
__See Attached Narrative ~ ~._~__.________.___~___.___.~.__._.__._ ___~_ __.~.__~__._.._~.__..____. _..
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
See Attached Narrative
C:\Documents and Settings\derekfergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708\Residenfial Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-1 tdoc
Page 3 of H
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
~I A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
L3 If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
C~ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
C~ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
~ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
® All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
R Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including tap of bark, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
~ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
~ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
LI Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
~ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
ACKNO.~W~LEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
RL '~~f? stormwater plan as noted above is included
stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 1A copies;
~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees;
C~ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and
condition of such trees;
~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
N/A Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
~ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
C:\Documen(s and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desklop\planning dept forms 0708\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-1 tdoc
Page 4 ol'S
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
~ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
X Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
X North arrow;
.............
X Engineering bar scale (rnininuarn scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
X All dimensions;
..................
X Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
X Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
X All required setbacks;
X All existing and proposed points of access;
_ X__ All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
X description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of alt public antl private easements;
X Location of all street rights-ot-way within and adjacent io the site;
X Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
X All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
X Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
X _ {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701};
X Location of all landscape material;
X Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
N/A Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
X _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level One (flexible standard development) and Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is
X required for any parking garage requiring a Level One (minimum standard and flexible standard) or Level Two approval.
r~
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
X Land area in square feet and acres;
_ X Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
~X Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
_..
X _ Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
X _ number of required spaces;
A Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
X expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
__._ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
X easement;
X Buiiding and structure heights;
_ X linperrneable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
X Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %ZX 11);
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
Please See Civil Site Data Table
~ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
N/A
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
-____
C9Docurnenls and SeLtingsVderek.ferc~usonADeskloplplanning dept forms 0708AResidenliai Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
I'Age S Or H
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not io exceed 24" x 36"):
X All existing and proposed structures;
X Names of abutting streets;
__
X Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
__. _
X Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
x Sight visibility triangles;
X Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
J Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
X _ tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
_ _X_ schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
x existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
X protective measures;
x Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
_ percentage covered;
X Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
x Irrigation notes.
~ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/ X 11);
^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
N/A Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
~ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information;
X All sides of all buildings;
_ X _ Dimensioned;
X Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations);
X Materials;
~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/z X 11.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806)
N/A No Signage Proposed at this time
^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
L:\Documents and Sellings\derek.fergusonlUesktop\planning dept forms 0708\Residenlial Infill Project (R_U) 2008 07-1'Ldoc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
~ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
N/A
Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or rnore new vehicle trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the Cily's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institrite of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
~ P,cknowledgement of h~affic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
I ratfic Impact Study is included. I he study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
_ ~ roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
RL t~~ ~ Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC
IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED
AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
~ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
__ _ Fire Flow Calntlations/Water Study is inr_.luded.
~RL "~ ,(~.,, Fire Flow CalculationsM/ater Study is not required. (Per Chief Rickard Not Required )
- - _.-~ 1_..~
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
r.- -_._
/ ~ r' ±
% ~ r
_~~ ti~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~.:~
Signature of property owner or represenf~tive
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn t and subscribed before me this ~ day of
__ 's :..~s - :._y: f , A.D. 20 G / to me and/or by
~, ,'i ;- ~ ~"- ~ ~{- ,who is personally known has
produced
as identfication. v
f\
~_ %~Notral~. public, 1 ~~ t
My commission expires: ? ~' ~ ~ ~
t~Y~U~ ^
~
~r
C:\DOCUments and Seftings\derek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Residenlial Inrill Project (FLD) 2008 0 -1~.
° f)OREt=f`J
A. ilVILLIAMS
18Y Cp~W11SSIOfJ ;f OD 576718
Page 7 OF 8 ~' `
~oP wv~~ ~::dPIRFS: October 14, 2010
Y-£i00-3-NO~f ~l F?`~ PL. Notary piscourt Assoc. Co.
i~. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTI-IORIZE AGENT.:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names:
- -- -- ---------- --------J
-{~1 ~ - -E - { I
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (ac.idress or general location):
3. That t-rh-i's property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (desctribe request)
~': l.. a pp (~ i-1 4T. F7 C'u >..~ L`~._4 '~) C~_~C~J / +" \ --~-~-~--- L:1 il! ~~S --------..
------1---------~ - ----- ---~. -- ~` - ~----~-
4- That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint
' i'2- ~ t~ ~ l ~ ~, ~-~ '. ~,~ .
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (I/we), the undersigr~d a4~thonty, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
o ~ n o~....,..~„ nv'vnc~
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this _ -_v,N ~__ __ day of
--
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
LIA.- ~`~'~ C~ personally appeared ~i~ C~`~s1 U __ ~~~ ~.~'~~~'o having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Pu_b ignature _
M Commission Ex Tres: ' ~ ~- 'Z.<J (~"~~
Y P ~---l-l-----f---------
5:APlannin0 DeUarlrnenl~Flpplicalion Form5lDevelopmenl Review\2008 Forms\Resideniial Inrill Project ;FLU) 2008 07-i~.doc
Pe~c 5 0l b
EXHIBIT ;4"
LEGAL DESCR/PTION
The. West 225 feet more or less of the South 80 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the
Northwest 1/4 AND the West 225 feet more or less of the North 100 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 1S East, Pinellas County,
Florida LESS AND EXCEPT rights-of-way of record and being further described as follows:
Commence at the Northeast corner of the Northwest quarter of sold Section 16; thence 500'40'42"W along
the East Ilne of said Northwest 1/4, for 1420.57 feet; thence N89.29'47"W along the monumented South
Ilne of the North 100 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of
sold Section 16, for 1103.11 feet to the monumented Southwest corner of the property platted as
SOFARELLI'S REPEAT and recorded in Plat Bool< 99 on page 45 of the Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue N89.29'47"W along sold South Ifne,
for 185.52 feet to the East right--af-way Ilne of McMullen Booth Road as recorded in Ofilclal Records
Book 6105 on page 1509 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence N00.40'S9"E along
said right-of-way Ilne also being a Ifne 50.00 feet east of and parallel to the West Ifne of the East half of
the Northwest quarter of sold Section 16, for 180.00 feet; thence S89.29'47"E, along the monumented
North Ilne of the South 80 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter
of said Section 16, for 185.80 feet to the northerly extension of the monumented West Ilne of sold platted
property; thence 500.46'14"W along sold northerly extension and sold monumented West Ilne, for 180.00
feat to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and contalning 33,419 square feet, more or less (0.7672 acres, more
or less).
LFTTE~'. ^ 1=~ RUTH ^ F~I~~TI ^ N
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee
(agent Name)
with ~~Od'Ch51[IP, ~Il[JIIIeCI"III ~6YVICCSr 1I~C. to act as an agent for
- ~
(Property Owner's Name)
And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and
approv~lls for the construction on the property generally located at
~ Ls cp ~" l e. l ~ ,~ ~ l t' 'r-% ~ ~ r.~ ~~ ~ 1~~ 1~.. ci. ~ ~ ~ r'l a° ~~~, ~i L r~ .~~
l (Property Location)
Pinellas Cou>~, State of FLORIDA.
Sig~re o~f Property Owner
~~ ~~ 0`}~ ~ ry~l ~~ ~~~Y ;~s ~~ C,r c~ ~CG~ j~
Acldress of Property Owner
City/State/Zip Code
Print Name of Property Owner
Title
Telephone Number
State of _ _~~/'
County of ~~\ ~~~~-~ :~~
~~~V1N111111119/,+~~
w. . ~Cf -r;ti e . ~.
~'o fkDD 705y3t) ; ~j
s 9 ~' ,~Ty&xxled ~~`~actg.°~~~.~~~`
~r~//9,A~~II11111 111 ~ o\\ ~a`~
(SEAL ABOVE)
The foregoing instrument wasca1cknowledge before me this
of r ~;~;\1C~_, 2C~)t~1~, by ~~~~(j~~ \K"_~~~:'~ ~ , as
who is personally Imown to me or )who has produced
as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
day
\ "` t
~~,. ~',' ~.' ~ ~ `'"~;~~~~ .,.._ ~ ~k-- -' `"~ Notary Public
(Signature) ~ ~~,
Commission ~
~~~`~~~\~~~==\ 1 `~~' y~:'~~(Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped)
l:lfr 200%186973 BI<': 158:L9 PG: 2231, 06~0:1.~2007 at 1'1.:55 AM, RPCORDING 3 hP.GL9
X27.00 KL:C7 13C7RI<L;, C]',1RI: O]? COURT ]?:CNL]",l_,P.S COUt1'P`[, P'T, BY llL;1U'CY C;LLIRK:
i:LECTD .5
PREPART•;D BY AbID RETURN 7'O:
Emi_I_ G. Pratesi, h;sd~.rLre
It]_char<Is, Gilkey, )T'i-te, SlaughCer,
L'r:al_rs- & 6Varc~l, P.A. ~ ~,
1253 I?ar{: Si.reet ~
Clearwater, P']oric9a 33756 ~ ~
-~ i
-__ ,
-`` .>
' ~' i i
i
~~
CORREC`1'I'VG WARRANTY DEED ~
+ ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~
i' ~~
, ~~
'1II1S TNDC~NTUR~, Made this ~, day of ~"~ fly ~;._, ' ~~ `,
~~Jv7, L~rl^+?cr »(ytt.'i'.~'lMi.i jJ.Lu2LL~ANi?1 3.1~=
f=CJ:~ J7t;iC~yarrr7i ~ _ ~
^~
;;+~_«_,,.~,ii
' ,
_ _
~
man, ~~rhose address is 163 Bayside Drive, C:Learwater Beach, tla
I'lori. ~
,
33%61 gr.anL'or*, and BAYSTDE TOWNHOMES, LLC, a Florida Limithc~, ;~
Liability Company whose address is 163 Baysi-de Drive, Cl.earwater~. '~
Beach, Florida 33%6"1 grantee*, _ _"
WI`PNESSETIf, That said grantor, for and. in consi'rj®ration of
the s~.Em of '['en Do].a_ars, and other good and val i,iable cpns`icJerations
L'o sai.d granter in hand paid by said grantee, the,geceip~. w,l~er_e'o->~
i.s hereby acknowledged, has granted, )jargai_rjed '~ra~~~oid~~ea~~Lhe
said grantee, and grantee's heirs arid assigns ~nrev~g,~~~the
i.`ollowing described land, siGiaated, ]_ying anc( bei~n~ ~,rS~~s.nell.as
\ \.
County, r'lorida, to-wit: ~
--
SINE EXHIBIT '"`A" AT'L'ACHED HERE°0~ ,~ '~ ~
i ~ ~ , `
i~ ~i
`. ~ ~ i ,
S[lI3JPCT `I'O covei7ants; cQnd~~iohs>~ aa~ements and
resti:ri_cti.ons oL 'record; a)rc~,'suP~~cet~~ta-taxes for the
year 2007 and sCEbse~7uent years.
`>
'lax T'ar'cel IVo, 16/29%16/OQti00/2~1"Q/`(1200
THIS DEED IS C,IVEN 1'O\`.('ORR;f:T *')~HB LEGAL DESCRTPTTON TN TIiAT
CER`i'Alt~l DEED RGpGRf~ED IN ~O;'i~c~ BOGh a53U3, fNGB 151A, OF' TFIE PUBLIC
RGCOI2DS bF' PINEr,LF1S'~O_ONTY~~ ~'LOR~I UA.
TI(E E'ROPERTh' DE~S~C2IBED ~~,FI~RNTN IS NOT AND NEVER HAS BEEN THE
EiOMGS`['E;AD 01= ~;RANi~OR. '
~ '
~ i ,~
NO DOCUMENTARI^'~~T}1MPS- AR~~ REQUI:RPD TO BE; DASD PURSUANT TO SEC'T'ION
12B-~1 . 01,3-(92)'(a)`,1^. A: C","
-~ _ -
f _ '-
and sai~l`~gran"~or hereby fu]_ly warrant the 'title to said ]_ahd, and
will deheh~d the same against t}ie lawful. claims of all persons
wliamsoeve~i~. `~
~~
'~
"\ -"G~anL'or" and "grantee" are used for sincju.lar or
plural., as ccnCext requires.
s
WRITTI~N SUL~MT"hTAL RIQUIp.IMI~N'T~S: (Code Section 3-9li.A)
I. The surrot~u~ding area consists of a mobile home park to the south, single
family houses to the east, and single family and town-houses to the north. The
proposed project would not detract from the neighborhood.
2. The proposed project would be an asset to the surrounding area and should
have a positive effect on the values of the adjacent properties.
Attached dwellings proposed in two two-unit buildings with appropriate
setbacks and open spaces as well as the formal establishment of the access to
properties to the east will enhance health and safety by providing the
residential presence of (eyes on the street) thereby improving security
cooperatively Of ail. residei7ts.
4. 13y formalizing access to the properties to the east and maintaining an
apps°opriate lot and block length grid, traffic flow is improved by providing for
dispersion rather than fiu7neling of vehicle trips onto existing congested
s1.reets.
5. 7n urban and suburban settings a mixture of housing types and densities add
vitality and interest to neighborhoods. The existing residential development
pattern already includes a mixture of detached dwelling types. The addition
of small scale attached dwelling units appropriately diversifies the housing
types, providing a stabilizing investment in the area that serves a consistent
community character of moderated density residential units.
6. The adaptive redevelopment of this site as residential is as anticipated by the
code. The hours of operation of the residential use as well as the visual,
acoustic, and olfactory impacts a~~e as anticipated for residential properties.
y ~
WRITThN SUBMITTAL, ILI3QUIRCMI~NTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria)
The pre-existing residential single family detached dwelling unit on the site was
(vacant) at the time of the 1999 development code adoption and the historic Lase of
John's Parkway as a road even though not dedicated created a defacto corner lot if
not dejure. These ,facts preclude meeting the attached dwelling LMDR criteria
and therefore requires the use of the residential in-fill flexible development
process.
2. Properties in the area on the east side of McMullen Booth Road are developed
with a mixture of housing types that include mobile homes to the south, single
family detached to the east, and town homes and single Family detached to the
north. The proposal to build two structures with two units each will provide new
lleigllbOrlloGd 1nV2stlllcnt ilGt OUl of Jcale Gild IlltlJS with tllt'% illea. 1 his new
investment will improve area market valises by providing a stable investment that
will likely encourage investment and re-investment in adjacent properties.
3. The proposal for attached residential use is allowed by and is of a density
consistent with the underlying residential urban land use.
4. The proposed Iiving units are in keeping with amulti-~u~it development to the
north and blends well with the mixture of housing types in the area that includes a
high density manufactured homes park, single family detached residences and
town homes.
The pre-existing single family detached dwelling on the site represents an
inefficient use of the property under current codes and market conditions. As
such it discourages maintenance and re-investment. Establishing foLU- units on
this site will represent an efficient residential use providing four housing units.
This new development will enhance the built environment, provide the dedication
of John's Parkway, and encourage similar investment in area properties.
The residential character of the vicinity is established by the variety of housing
types present. This multi-unit project is divided into two two-unit. buildings to
maintain a consistent form, function and mass in keeping with some of the
existing area units.
7. No set back, height, parking, access, or other development flexibility is requested
to construct this project.
Planning Department CASE #:
Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY:
} Clearwater, Florida 33756 (startlnitials)
~~ .~„/~/ti..~ Telephone: 727-562-4567 DATE RECEIVED:
_/~....r~,....~'~._..~"~....-~'~~.-' Fax:727-562-4865
^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION
(Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets)
^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN FEE: $200.00
(Not required if submitted as part of an FLS orFLD application)
^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE OF $600.00
NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
Y1Z~L11V1.11~1A1ZY ~LA~1~ A~YLIC;AT'101~1
(REVISED 04/24/07)
~PC~EASE TYPE OR PRINT
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AGENT AND PLAT PREPARER INFORMATION: (code section a-2o2.A and a-~os.A.)
APPLICANT NAME: Agostino DiGiovanni
MAILING ADDRESS: 2245 McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE NUMBER: 727-656-8972 FAX NUMBER: 727-797-8928
CELL NUMBER: 727_656-4863 EMAIL:
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Agostino DiGiovanni
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: Ron Letize
MAILING ADDRESS: 1928 Valencia Way, Cl earwater, FL 33764
PHONE NUMBER: 727-797-8972 FAX NUMBER: 727-797-8928
CELL NUMBER: 727-443-1143 EMAIL: ronletize@tampabay.rr.com
Renee Ruggiero,
PLAT PREPARER: preliminary Prepared by Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (Project Planner
MAILING ADDRESS:
I 300 S. Belcher Road,
_ _...._ _ _.. _. _._ Clearwater, FL 33765
_ -- _ __.._
_..__._ _...--._ _.__.. ___....__....--- ------- -----...-----
PHONE NUMBER: 727-443-2869 FAX NUMBER: 727_446-8036
CELL NUMBER: 727-235-8475 EMAIL: renee@northsideengineeringservices.c
C.~ I Documents and Settingsld~re/c ferguson I Desk[oplp/rnrning/or~ms_07071 Preliminm y Plal Od-24-07. doc
Pn~e 1 of 7
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPIVIEN-L INFORIVIA-LION: (code section a-2ot.n)
PIt0.11~=C I~ f~IAME: Pa t:i o llomes }~>y Che 13ay PROJECT VALUATION: `~; 0>tt , 000.00
S I REEF AI)DRL.SS :109 Mr:MuiTen Booth Road
_._ _
_. __ _
I'ARCEI_. ~~11JM13F_R(S): 1 6-29-16-0 000 0-2 4 0-02 0 0
_ _ .._ _..
PARCEL SILI: (acres): 0.595 I'AI~C1 L SIZE (square feel): 25, 93 L (afi er dedi-cats on )
IJ-GAI_ DLSCi~IPTION: Sec 1 xbib r L- "A Legal Uc.,cr i t~L i on
PROPOSED USE(S): ALLarhed Dwctlings
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (code section a-zoz.n.el
LI SUBMFF A COPY OF THE IITI_E INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO l1iE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSI-IIP (see
page 3)
Fourteen ('14) copies of the preliminary plat shall be submitted.
The preliminary plat shall he prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale
not smaller than one inch equals 100 feet (1:100), shall not exceed 2~t" X 36" and include the following
information:
TITLr_ uNDErz wl-nct I rt Ir_ wROPOSED Pt AT Is ro BF_ RECORDED;
NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPI-IONS NUMBER OF TFIF_ PERSON PREPARING TI IE PLAT;
IDENTIPICAIION CLEARLY STATING FLIAT TI IF DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT;
l_EGAI_ DESCRIPTION 01= TI IE PROPERTY, U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSI-IIP AND RANGE LINES;
EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGIiTS-OE-WAY AND EASEMENTS;
PROPOSED STREET NAMES;
NAMES,~APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OFAD,IOINING PLATS;
DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF TI IF EOI_L.OWING:
THE OVL==BALL. PLAT;
EACI I I-0 F;
STREE F RIGI-i l S-OF-~"JAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS;
COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BF_ DEDICATED 1-0FZ A PIJBI_IC PURPOSI= IF ANY;
NORhI I ARROW, SCALE AND DATE.
D. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
laiowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application-
} //'~ ld
s"" / / (~I ~I jJ M
Signature of property owner or re{y(~esentative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINFLLAS
Sy~onr to and subscribed before me this ~ day of
-- ~~''`~~ ~ ~~1. L_ , A.D. 20 C~ ~ to me andlor by
/r'~r )/ 4i / - - 1 :;~ ,who is personally known has
produced __
as identification ,
,_,,
~~~ ~ ~_
i
Notary pribhc, ~ ,.
My commission expires: ~ ~ i_ ~ ~. I t~~!
,::.
,...
i :.,- ~~ ~u„~s, i ~(~NC~I t~ r`~ Wi1116~,h~hS
~~sre7la
t t s~ ~ ~,t~nrfls~ lorl ` t ~ ~o~o
G~IUocunieulsa~xl.Sel6n~~gsldere%/ergrra~onlDes'l'loplplcuiriing/i~rius_070711'rc i~{~w~u '~~n10-J J~!'-I~~do~~r~r~~ ~ ~~.Co.
I'agc 2 0l'7 ~ of FL i r y I,Is: -
t i uoo a ~ ~,;r.
EXHIBIT °A"
LEGAL DESCR/PTION
The West 225 feet more or less of the South 80 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the
Northwest 1/4 AND the West 225 ieet more or less of the North 100 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County,
Florida LESS AND EXCEPT rights-of-way of record and being further described as follows:
Commence at the Northeast corner of the Northwest quarter of sold Section 16; thence 500.40'42"W along
the East line of sold Northwest 1/4, for 1420.57 feet; thence N89'29'47"W along the monumented South
Ilne of the North 100 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of
said Secflon 16, for 1103.11 feet to the monumented Southwest corner of the property platted as
SOFARELLI'S REPLAY and recorded In Plat Book 99 on page 45 of the Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue N89'29'47"W along sold South Ilne,
for 185.52 feet to the East right-of-way Ilne of McMullen Booth Road as recorded In Ofilclal Records
Boolc 6105 on page 1509 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence N00'40'59"E along
sold right-of-woy Ilne also being a Ilne 50.00 feet east of and parallel to the West Ilne of the East half of
the Northwest quarter of sold Section 16, for 180.00 feet; thence S89'29'47"E, along the monumented
North Ilne of the South 80 feet of the Southwest quorfer of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter
of sold Section 16, for 185.80 feet io the northerly extension of the monumented West Ilne of sold platted
property; thence 500'46'14"W along sold northerly extension and sold monumented West Ilne, for 180.00
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and contalning 33,419 square feet, more or less (0.7672 acres, more
or less.
LETTER D F AUTI-I O RIZATI C~ R!
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee
(agent Name)
with ~o~th~ide Engineering Services, ~IIC. to act as an agent for
r`t y S „` ~ ,c ~ . ~ ~., lip w~ ~ ~n ~-, ~!,
~ (Property Owner's Name)
And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and
approvals for the construction on the property generally located at
(i 1 I ~ / f r_
(Property Location)
Pinellas County, State of FLORIDA.
<< ,~
Signa ure of Property Owner
Address of Property Owner
City/State/Zi Cp ode
~, )~
Print Name of Property Owner
Title
Telephone Number
State of
<:_
County of _~\ ~1~,', ~~ `~~
~~,Il~llulwll,,~
~o~~°~~~\F~R MOS fy,,o,~
~1'~'.°~M~SSIO~F °? s~
~ ~U er ~
ti : fkDD 7058is~3 ; ~~~
r ~ ~ • \
/,//,//~ ~~ll111111111 10~~ ~a\w
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this ,A~ / day
~ ~~~, y, ~~~ «C~
of >(.,~;vl~ , 2 ~~~, by~ ~(i~LC~,u'~..~,~, , as
who is personally known to me or who has produced
as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
t ~, 't
,~ \ `
\\ --"~~--"+'`~~~. ~~~` x` ~.~,, Notary Public
(Signature) '~~
Commission #
(SEAL ABOVE) ''~~~ ~~`~\~<--\ ,1 `i `•; ~~\\(Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped)
I#:~20071fl6973 BK: 15819 PG: 2231, 06/01/2007 at 11:55 AM, RECORDING 3 PAGES
$27,00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OP COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, I'L BY DEPUTY CLERK:
CLKTDI5
Z ~ , ~~
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
Emil G. Pratesi, Esquire
Richards, G.i..lkey, Eite, Slaughter,
Pratasi & Ward, P.A.
1253 Park Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
CORRECTIVE WARRANTY DEED
.,
~,
~,
~~
- _+ i
~~ i ~~
' ,'
_ ~~ ` ~ i
. ,
~~ ~~
~
~ ~ ` ~ `
,' i
'~
THIS INDENTURE, Made this ~I day of ~/~y ~~ __, `~~ ~'
,_ ~A
2007, Betwe~ti AOi~~Ta,Fy^_, D?GS=%`vA2riv= ti; e~~ - »L7i D? =?v ~?v_YI' - ~ ~c:i' =~ ~ _
man, whose address is 163 Bayside Drive, Clearwater Beach, Florida ~~,
33767 grantor*, and HAYSIDE TOWNHOMES, LLC, a Florida Limit~c~,
Liability Company whose address is 163 Bayside Drive, Clearwater`. '~~
Beach, Florida 33767 grantee*, _'
WITNESSETH, That said grantor, for and in consi_d®ration of
the sum of Ten Do1:lars, and other good and valuable consideration
to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the,Ceceip~~w~ereo-t?
is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained '~r~c~~ sold~~tb~~tlie
said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns >=oreve~,~~~the
following described land, situated, lying ancj bei~pg ~i,rS'~P.inell.as
County, E"lorida, to-wit:
-,~ ` i
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO ~ `~`~
i ~
~~ ~,
i~
SUBJECT TO covenants, cQnd~Liohs;, _aasements and
restrictions of record; arrd,'sub~act~~tn-taxes for the
year 2007 and subsequent yedrs.
Tax Parcel No. 16/29/16/00ti00/24Q/'Q200
TFIIS DEED IS GIVEN TO ` CO~2RE~T \'tM~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THAT
CER'.I'ATN DEED REGORGED I[d +~`.Rc BQGK 15803, PAGE 1818, GF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS O1:' PINELLI~S"C`dUNTY;` FLORIDA.
-- \
THE PROPERTY DE,S~RIBED\~H~RE1N IS NOT AND NEVER HAS BEEN 1'HE
HOMESTEAD OF ~RANtOR. ~'
` ~~
NO DOCUMENTARY`;~TAb4PS- ARF~ REQUIRED TO BE PAID PURSUANT TO SECTION
12B-9.01;3-(32) (a)`,r.A:C."~
and saicl`~gran`tor hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and
will de8ehd the same against the lawful claims of all persons
wliamsoeve~i~. `
~~
,`` ,
`~~„Gfantor" and "grantee" are used for singular or
plural., as context requires.
~~
1~~ .
~~
O
~ M
m !~
r g~
~~I~
~ Iry
I
1
i
E_ _
EX. MOB/LENOMEPARR
gg ~~
~ANIDWY 9 0~ mt aa:wma
GULF TO-BAYBOULEVARD
~
;
O
gS
Y
~
~
3
•
NEW2•ASPHALT (8-/) EB 05938 ~ ~ ~ ~
NEWB'CONCRE7E
NEW BU/LD/NB NES Comm.: 0979
o~..~e. x.ea.
cn.a.a ey: x.s.
Issue Dale: OB/26I09
NOTE.•ALL MECHAN/CAL EQU/PMENT Berl=Ian::
SHALL BECOMPLETELYSCREENED
fROM V/EW ONALL fOUR S/DES
~ ~
NORTH
SCALE: i"=20'
~-~ ~ ~ ~~
C3a1
Tree Inventory
Patio Homes by the Bay
109 S. McMullen-Booth Road
Clearwater, Florida
September 21, 2009
Prepared by: Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist
For: DiGiovanni Homes
The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist, and includes
findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in
the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and
my report is factual and unbiased.
Tree Canopy Analysis and Preservation Strategies
The subject property is a former single family residential lot and the tree canopy is
comprised of a mixture of native and exotic trees and palms. Several trees and palms are
high quality and are worthy of preservation and are noted as such in the inventory. In
particular, three live oak (Quercus virginiana) trees, #l, 8 & 17 in the following
inventory warrant serious consideration for preservation. One fallen queen palm and two
standing queen palms are infected by the deadly fungus Ganoderma. These palms are
identified in the tree inventory and should be removed as soon as possible as this disease
is very contagious and will infect nearby palms. There are several trees that are
considered to be noxious species as they are invasive exotic trees according to the State
of Florida's Exotic Pest Council's list. These trees will be identified in the tree inventory
and recommended for removal. The following inventory will identify trees that should be
considered for preservation as well as trees that are not recommended for preservation.
Tree Inventory Data
A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a
valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could
lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four
codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the data used in
the inventory:
Tree# -location -Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that
corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the
field.
Size -Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If
there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area
below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.).
S ecies -Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in
the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter.
Condition Rating -The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural
strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities,
decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and
attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the
trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included
bark.
Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net
photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health
will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree
as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating
include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2)
crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the
tree is making and storing energy.
The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any
unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen.
Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as
follows:
0- A dead tree
1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease
or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1
ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). Atree with a rating
of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury
or property damage.
2 - A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included
bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback,
cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low
energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies
or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s)
can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable
amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating.
3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be
corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal
area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon
have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average
appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible.
4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems
that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive
appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree
should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees
exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can
be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic
amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and
should be preserved.
5 - A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health
and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this
category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in
this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity
and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value
to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is
worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation.
6 - A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior
qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown
ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness.
A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures
that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an
undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an
experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified
Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree.
Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not
covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may
include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It
may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree.
NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3-5 years. However, events such as
drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and
severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial
maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely
affected, have the tree inspected by a qualified International Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist.
NOTE: Whenever possible it is advised to adhere to inventory recommendations when
selecting trees to be preserved. For example, trees rated 4.0 and higher should be
preserved if at all possible, while trees rated 2.0 and lower should be removed unless
otherwise noted in the inventory. Trees rated 2.5 are generally recommended for removal
unless remedial work is performed to upgrade them. Trees rated 3.0 and 3.5 are average
trees that have good potential and warrant serious consideration for preservation but not
to the extent that site plan modifications are necessary.
When work of an arboricultural nature is recommended in the inventory it should
be performed directly or under the supervision of a competent International Society
of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist.
Per City of Clearwater requirements the tree inventory will provide an overall
condition rating for each protected tree species that is 4" in trunk diameter or
greater at 4.5' above grade and each protected palm species with a clear trunk (CT)
of 10' or greater. In addition, other tree species that are not protected by code but
were picked up in the tree survey are also rated and included in the inventory.
This tree inventory was conducted on September 19, 2009.
Tree Inventory
Tree # Size Species Rating
1. 44" live oak (Querctcs virginiana)
4.0
Comments: This tree has had a portion of the center of the canopy removed due to the
presence of utility wires. However, it is a healthy tree with good structure. It needs the
canopy to be raised, deadwood in the crown removed and its roots have uplifted the
sidewalk. Recommend preservation.
2. 10", 12" Jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) 2.0
Comments: This tree has utility wires passing through the crown in two directions. It has
been previously topped. Recommend removal.
3. 22' CT queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffianum) 3.0
4. 22" laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) 3.5
Comments: An above average tree. Raise crown and remove deadwood is preserving.
5. 7"
live oak
1.5
Comments: This tree is growing beneath the canopy of adjacent trees and has very poor
form, lacks secondary branching and has low crown density. Recommend removal.
6. 7", 15", 22" jacaranda 1.0
Comments: This tree has a codominant trunk with included bark and cavities with decay
present. This is a very poor tree and needs to be removed.
7. 18' CT
queen palm
0.5
Comments: This tree is almost dead. Recommend removal.
8. 51"
live oak
4.5
Comments: The trunk of this tree forms a codominant trunk 4' above grade that is not
included. The tree has overall good structure and health and exceptional form. It has a
small pocket cavity on the east side of the trunk 3' above grade that does not appear to be
a problem as there is no apparent progressive decay. The canopy will likely need to be
raised if the tree is preserved and the tree has deadwood due to over canopy shading that
should be removed. This is a very good tree and recommended for preservation.
NOTE: The survey has located punk trees which are a noxious exotic tree that are
exempt from tree ordinance requirements. Furthermore they are required to be removed
by state statutes on any properties being developed or redeveloped. They will be noted in
the inventory because they are shown on the survey but will be rated as 0.0 as they are
not protected.
9 12" punk tree (Melaleuca quinquenervia) 0.0
Comments: Noxious species -recommend removal.
NOTE: Trees preceded with an asterisk (*) denote trees that are on adjacent property but
are required to be surveyed as they will need to be protected during construction as their
root systems enter the subject property. They will not be factored into the mitigation
requirements and their condition rating enclosed by parenthesis to denote that they are
not applicable.
* 10. 16" water oak (Quercus nigra) 2.5
* 11. 16" live oak 2.5
12. 21" pecan (Carya illinoensis) 3.0
Comments: this is an average tree that is worthy of preservation if it falls into a green
space. It has dead branches probably due to fall webworm which commonly attacks this
species. If preserved the dead wood should be removed.
13. 20" punk tree 0.0
Comments: Noxious species -recommend removal.
NOTE: The camphor tree is an invasive exotic that is on the State of Florida's Exotic
Pest Plant Council's list of category one invasive species. Invasive species are considered
a threat to the natural plant communities of Florida and are therefore recommend for
removal.
14. 16" camphor (Cinnamomum camphora) 2.0
Comments: Invasive exotic, recommend removal.
15. 12' CT queen palm 3.0
16. 28' C.T. queen palm 3.5
Comments: If preserved remove vines.
* * 17. 29" live oak 4.0
Comments: this tree is healthy with good structure; if preserved elevate the crown and
remove dead wood.
** This tree may be on the property line. It is in effect a "tenants in common" ownership
and should be preserved and maintained per proper industry standards.
18. 27' CT queen palm 3.0
19. 25' CT queen palm 4.0
Comments: Palms #20 & 21 are. attached at the base and if they will be relocated on site
they should be moved as one palm.
20. 32' CT Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata) 4.0
Comments: A good palm that could be preserved in place or relocated on site.
21. 10" crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) 2.5
22. 12" crape myrtle 2.5
Comments: Trees #21 & 22 are below average multi-trunked crape myrtle trees that have
been neglected. If preserved and maintained properly that could evolve into good trees.
23. 20' CT queen palm 0.0
Comments: Dead hazardous palm. Recommend removal.
*24. 15' CT queen palm 3.0
Comments: If preserved, remove dead fronds.
*25. 20' CT queen palm 3.5
Comments: If preserved, remove dead fronds
*26. 10' CT queen palm 2.5
*27. 11' CT queen palm 2.5
*28. 22' CT queen palm 3.5
*29. 12' CT queen palm 2.5
Comments: This palm is located on adjacent property
*30 36" laurel oak 3.0
Comments: This tree is located on adjacent property.
*31. 11" jacaranda l .0
Comments: This tree is on adjacent property.
*32. 12" Australian pine (Casuarina spp.) l .0
Comments: This tree is on adjacent property.
*33. 16" Australian pine 1.0
Comments: This tree is on adjacent property.
NOTE: Trees #34 & 35 have a deadly and highly contagious disease caused by the
Ganoderma fungus. These trees should be removed as soon as possible as the spores will
spread to adjacent trees. One tree has already died from the fungus and is lying on the
ground.
34. 26' CT queen palm 0.5
Comments: This palm is infected by the deadly Ganoderma fungu s -remove as soon as
possible.
35. 32' CT queen palm 0.5
Comments: This palm is infected by the deadly Ganoderma fungus -remove as soon as
possible.
36. 10" crape myrtle 2.5
37. 32" punk tree 0.0
Comments: Noxious species -recommend removal.
38. 24" punk tree 0.0
Comments: Noxious species -recommend removal.
39. 6" jacaranda 2.5
40. 12" crape myrtle 2.5
Comments: Remove vines if preserved.
41. 35' CT queen palm 2.0
Comments: This palm has a nutritional deficiency and if prese rved should be fertilized
with a palm special -slow release fertilizer.
42. 22' CT queen palm 2.5
Comments: This palm has a nutritional deficiency and if prese rved should be fertilized
with a palm special -slow release fertilizer.
43. 25' CT queen palm 3.5
Comments: Remove dead fronds if preserved.
44. 12" camphor tree 1.5
Comments: Invasive exotic -recommend removal.
45. 20' CT queen palm 0.0
Comments: Dead palm -recommend removal
46. 30' CT Senegal date palm 3.0
Comments: If preserved, remove dead fronds and fertilize.
47. 24' CT queen palm 3.0
Comments: If preserved, remove dead fronds and fertilize.
48. 23' CT queen palm 2.5
Comments: If preserved, remove dead fronds and fertilize.
*49 23' CT queen palm 3.5
Comments: This palm is on adjacent property.
50. 6", 6", 11" jacaranda 1.0
Comments: This tree has large cavities at the base and will soon be hazardous.
Recommend removal.
51. 20" sills oak (Grevillea robusta) 0.5
Comments: Hazardous tree, remove as soon as possible
52. 24" silk oak 1.5
Comments: This tree has progressive decay, recommend removal.
TRU55 6RN'G.
TRU55 6RN'G.
~P1N. PLR.
~AY51DE vl~~as
FRONT ELEVATION - N lob ~ MACMULLEN ~oOTH RD.
SGALE: 3/IG° ~ I'-o" GLEARWATER, P~-• 33750
y,`_J `:
.. ~~
51DE ELEVATION - W TAYSIDE VILLAS
REVERSE POR EAST 51DE ELEVATION 10~ ~ MAGMULLEN EOOTH RD.
SCALE: 3/I(o• ~ I~ 0~ GLEARWATER, R- 3375
SIDE ELEVATION - E TAYSIDE VILLAS
REVERSE POR WEST 51DE ELEVATION 100 MAGMULLEN BOOTH RD.
SCALE: 3/Ifo" • I~-0" GLEARWATER, R.. 33750
~AY51DE VILLAS
REAR ELEVATION ~ 5 10~~ MACMUU.EN POOTH RD.
~~CALE: 3/I(o" ~ I~-0° CLEARWATER. PL• 3375°J