Loading...
FLD2009-09033 - 1225 Highland Ave S - Pine-Berry Senior Apartments FLD2009-09033 12 2 5 S HI GHLAND AVE PI]~VE-BERRY SENIOR APARTMEN~1'S PLANNER OF RECORD: S K ATLAS # 307A ZONING: C LAND USE: CG RECEIVED : 09/01 /2009 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC CDB: CLWCoverSheet CDB Meeting Date: November 17, 2009 Case Numbers: FLD2009-09033 Agenda Item: D. 6. Owner/Applicant: O& P Investments of Tampa Inc/Pine-Berry Senior Limited Partnership Representative: David Bilyeu, P.E., Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Addresses: 1225 Highland Avenue and 1541 Bair Sy treet CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings in the High Density Residential (HDR) District and Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 140,075 square feet, a lot width of 166 feet (along Highland Avenue) and 627 feet (along Barry Street), a front (west) setback of 289.3 feet (to porte-cochere) and 29.2 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback. of 26 feet (to building) and 17.5 feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of 22.8 feet (to building) and 8.3 feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of 30.3 feet (to building), a rear (south) setback of 134.1 feet (to building), a side (east) setback of 24.7 feet (to building) and 16 feet (to pavement), a rear (south) setback of five feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of four feet (to pavement), a rear (south) setback of 22 feet (to pavement) and a side (east) setback of 41.6 feet (to building) and five feet (to pavement), a building height of 49 feet (to midpoint of roof) and 91 parking spaces under the provisions of Community Development Code Sections 2-504.F and 2-704.C as a residential infill project and comprehensive infill redevelopment project respectively and a reduction to interior landscape requirements from 10 percent to 5.5 percent, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from 10 feet to five feet, a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from 10 feet to four feet and a reduction to the rear (south) landscape buffer from 10 feet to five feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G. CURRENT ZONING: Commercial (C) and High Density Residential (HDR) Districts CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Commercial General (CG} and Residential High (RH) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Indoor Recreation and Entertainment (Bowling Alley) Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-09033 -Page 1 of 10 EXISTING North: Office (O} District SURROUNDING Office ZONING AND USES: South: High Density Residential (HDR) District Attached Dwellings East: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District Detached Dwellings West: Commercial (C) District Manufacturing/Office ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 3.22 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Barry Street. The site is comprised of three parcels; two of which are zoned High Density Residential and the other zoned Commercial. The Commercial parcel is developed with a 27,537 square foot bowling alley which has been vacant since June 2005, and is in a state of disrepair. This parcel has been the subject of over 14 code enforcement cases since its closing. It has been the source of graffiti, transients and overgrowth. One parcel zoned High Density Residential contains a parking lot and the other is currently undeveloped. The combined parcels are of an odd shape containing two fronts, five sides and three rear property lines. To the east of the subject property are detached dwellings and to the south are attached dwellings (condominiums). Offices are located to the north of the subject property and retail sales/service uses are located to the west. Development Proposal: The proposal is to construct 85 apartment style dwelling units for senior living at a density of 24- units/acre in the Commercial District and 30-units/acre in the HDR District. In this case the applicant averaged the density to obtain the 85 units. The proposed attached dwellings, Pine Berry Senior Living, will be designed for active seniors with moderate incomes. The development will be restricted to residents age 62 and over with an expected median age of 72. The concept is designed to promote interaction among its residents by providing spacious and inviting common areas and coordinated community activities. The attached dwellings are proposed at a height of 49 feet to midpoint of the roof. The first floor contains 13 one-bedroom apartments and nine two-bedroom units. Additionally, the first floor will contain a theater, a fitness room, an office, a mail area, and clubroom. Floors two through four each contain 10 one-bedroom apartments and 11 two-bedroom apartments. Each apartment will feature central air conditioning, wall-to-wall carpeting, stackable washer and dryer hookup, dishwasher, stove, refrigerator, disposal and a pull cord warning system. The main building color is SW6379 Jersey Cream and is accented with SW6387 Compatible Cream. The exterior of the four story building will be constructed of hardy board siding, stucco and stone veneer accents. The building will have green architectural shingles and the porte- cochere will have a standing seam metal roof. The site includes an ingress/egress area on both Highland Avenue and Barry Street. The Highland Avenue access will be the main access point Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-09033 -Page 2 of 10 for residents and visitors. The Barry Street access is primarily for emergency and solid waste access and contains aturn-around for both. This area also contains five parking spaces. The building is proposed to be set back 289 feet on Highland Avenue and 26 feet on Barry Street. Side setbacks of 22.8 feet to building on the south property line, 30.3 feet to building on the west property line and 41.6 feet to building on the east property line are proposed. A rear (south) setback of 134.1 feet to building is proposed. A decorative six-foot wrought iron fence with masonry columns is proposed along both Highland Avenue and Barry Street. The remainder of the site will use six-foot black vinyl clad chainlink fencing along the perimeter. Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Sections Z-701.1 and 2.501.1 the maximum density for properties with a designation of Commercial General is 24 dwelling units per acre and Residential High is 30 dwelling units per acre. Based on the 1.69 acres zoned Commercial, 40 dwelling units are permissible; and based on the 1.53 acres zoned High Density Residential, 45 dwelling units are permissible. The overall density permissible for the project is 85 dwelling units and as such 85 dwelling units are proposed. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Sections 2-701.1 and 2.501.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.90 and 0.85 respectively. The overall proposed ISR is 0.55, which is consistent with both Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-504, the minimum lot area for attached dwellings is 15,000 square feet. The overall site is 140,075 square feet of lot area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width is 150 feet. The width of the lot along Highland Avenue is 166 feet and 627 feet along Barry Street. Pursuant to CDC Section 2-704, the attached dwelling use is not specifically authorized and as such there is no specific minimum lot area and width denoted in Table 2-704. However most uses in the Commercial (C) District have minimum lot areas from 3,500 square feet to 40,000 square feet. Likewise mosi uses in the Commercial (C) District have lot width requirements from 30 feet to 200 feet. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-504, the minimum front setback for attached dwellings can range between 15 - 25 feet, the side setback can range between 0 - 10 feet and the rear can range between 10 - 15 feet. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 17.5 feet (to pavement) for only 45 feet in length, with the remaining 582 feet of the property being 23 feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback from 10 feet to 8.3 feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement) for only 33 feet in length and a rear (south) setback which is requested to be reduced from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement). Of the 10 property lines around this combined parcel only one does not fall within the flexibility range, that being the rear (south) setback which is requested to be reduced from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement) for only 34 feet in length; however, it is consistent with the Residential Infill Project and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment provisions. Setbacks to building on both fronts are generous with a front (west) setback of 289.3 feet and a front (north) setback of 26 feet. Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 704, the attached dwelling use is not specifically authorized and as such there is no specific minimum setbacks denoted in Table 2-704. However most uses in the Commercial (C) District have front setbacks from 15 feet to 25 feet, side setbacks from 0 feet to 10 feet and rear setbacks Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-09033 -Page 3 of 10 from 10 feet to 20 feet. These setbacks in CDC Section Z-704 are the same as CDC Section 2- 504. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-504, the maximum building height for attached dwellings can range between 30 - I30 feet. The proposed height of the building is 49 feet (to midpoint of roof). Pursuant to CDC Section 2-704, the attached dwelling use is not specifically authorized and as such there is no specific building height in Table 2-704. However most uses in the Commercial (C) District have maximum building heights of 25 feet to 50 feet. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-704, the attached dwelling use is not specifically authorized and as such there is no specific parking requirement denoted in Table 2- 704. However, pursuant to CDC Section 2-504, the minimum required parking for attached dwellings is two spaces per dwelling unit. Based upon the above, the 85 dwelling units will require 170 parking spaces and the proposal has provided for 94 spaces (1.1 spaces/unit). The applicant has provided a parking demand study to substantiate the reduction. The complex will not have any central dining or medical facilities or offer housekeeping services requiring full- time staff. Three employees performing maintenance and property management services will be on site daily. The proposed development is an active senior complex where residents are independent and come and go as they please. Historical data. from other .senior housing complexes has shown seniors, whether living alone or as a mature couple, typically maintain ownership of one vehicle. In some instances they are no longer driving due to medical or age restrictions and therefore do not own a vehicle and rely on mass transit or others for transportation. The proposed development was analyzed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation, 3rd Edition Land Use Code 252 (Senior Adult Housing) which demonstrates a parking ratio of 0.50 spaces per dwelling unit. Additionally, the lease agreements will stipulate that it will issue only one parking space per unit. Thus, 1.1 parking spaces per unit will allow ample space for residents, visitors and occasional employee parking needs. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. No structures or landscaping is proposed within the site triangles. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize a refuse dumpster located inside the building which will be rolled outdoors on collection days. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this development will be installed underground on site in compliance with this requirement. All electric panels, boxes and meters will be painted the same color as the building. Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a 15-foot wide landscape buffer along Highland Avenue a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along Barry Street and ten foot Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-09033 -Page 4 of 10 wide buffers on all the remaining side and rear property lines. The proposal includes a 1 S-foot wide landscape buffer along Highland Avenue, a 10-foot wide buffer along Barry Street and 10 foot wide buffers along three side and two rear property lines. The proposed buffers include over 100 trees and palms and 2,000 shrubs and ground cover species. The generous landscape buffers include trees such as magnolia, red maple, bald cypress, dahoon holly, live oak and crape myrtle; palms include sabal and washingtonia; and shrubs and groundcover include plumbago, Simpson stopper, thyrallis, hibiscus, jasmine, viburnum, ornamental grasses, lirope, Lantana, African iris and perennial peanut. The proposal does include a reduction to the landscape buffer on the side (east) from 10 feet to five feet, a reduction to the side (west) buffer from 10 feet to four feet and to the rear (south) buffer from 10 feet to five feet. As part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program the applicant has proposed to plant required trees and shrubs elsewhere on site to off-set the buffer reductions. The east buffer will contain a fence along with Jasmine in the five feet wide area. Currently fences and landscape material exist along a portion of the adjacent properties on the east property line. As stated previously this parcel has 10 property lines some with limited frontage, as such the reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer is for 27 feet of the total 34 feet length and the reduction to the rear (south) buffer is for 28 feet of the total 33 feet length. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be provided for 100 percent of a building facade with frontage along a street right of way. The foundation plantings must be a minimum of a five foot wide area composed of at least two accent trees or three palm trees for every linear 40 feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscape area. A minimum of 50 percent of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Both the Highland Avenue building facade and the Barry Street building facade have proposed foundation plantings to meet this requirement. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, ten percent of the vehicular use area must contain landscape islands a minimum of i50 square feet in size. Eight interior landscape islands have been proposed equating to 5.5 percent of the vehicular use area. Five of the seven proposed landscape islands are very generous in size ranging from 280 square feet to 670 square feet in size. The request does include a reduction to the interior landscape requirement from 10 percent to 5.5 percent. Based on the generous size of the proposed islands which will accommodate mature large canopy shade trees the applicant has requested relief from this requirement. As in the buffers the applicant has proposed additional trees and shrubs elsewhere on site. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-09033 -Page 5 of 10 Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-501.1, 2-701.1 and 2-504: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 30/dua (RH) and 85 dwelling units X 24/dua (CG) Maximum ISR 0.85 0.55 X Minimum Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. 140,075 sq. ft. X Minimum Lot Width 150 feet Highland Avenue: 166 feet X Barry Street: 627 feet Minimum Setbacks Front: 15 - 25 feet North: 26 feet (to building) X 17.5 feet (to pavement) West: 289.3 feet (to pone-cochere) 29.2 feet (to pavement) Side: 0 - 10 feet South: 22.8 feet (to building) X 8.3 feet (to pavement East: 24.7 feet (to building) 16 feet (to Pavement) 41.6 feet (to building) 5 feet (to pavement) West: 30.3 feet (to building) 4 feet (to pavement) Rear: 10- l5 feet South: 134.1 feet (to building) 5 feet (to pavement) X~ 22 feet (to pavement) Maximum Height 30 - 100 feet 49 feet (to midpoint of roof) X Minimum 2.0 spaces per unit 1.10 spaces per unit X~ Off-Street Parking (170 parking spaces) (94 parking spaces) ~ See nnniysis in Stnff Report Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-09033 -Page 6 of 10 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-504.F (Residential Infill Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity or other development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access X or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-09033 -Page 7 of 10 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-704.C. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and annronriate distances between buildines. Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-09033 -Page 8 of 10 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of October 1, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 3.22 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Barry Street; 2. That the subject property is located within the High Density Residential (HDR) District and the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category; 4. The property was previously used as a bowling alley and is now vacant; 5. The applicant, Pine Berry Senior Limited Partnership, proposes to redevelop the subject property with 85 attached dwelling units; 6. The structure is proposed at a height of 49 feet to midpoint of the roof; 7. The proposal includes a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet; 8. The proposal includes a reduction to the interior landscape requirement from 10 percent of vehicular use area to 5.5 percent of vehicular use area; 9. The proposal includes reductions to the landscape buffer on the side (east) from 10 feet to five feet, the side (west) from 10 feet to four feet and the rear (south) from 10 feet to five feet; 10. The submitted Parking Demand Study demonstrates the requested parking space reduction from 170 spaces to 91 spaces is adequate; and 11. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-09033 -Page 9 of 10 Conclusions of Law: The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: I. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-501.1 and 2- 701.1 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 504.F and 2-704.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. The development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings in the High Density Residential (HDR) District and Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 140,075 square feet, a lot width of 166 feet (along Highland Avenue) and 627 feet (along Barry Street), a front (west) setback of 289.3 feet (to porte-cochere) and 29.2 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback of 26 feet (to building) and 17.5 feet (to pavement), a side (south) setback of 22.8 feet (to building) and 8.3 feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of 30.3 feet (to building), a rear (south) setback of 134.1 feet (to building), a side (east) setback of 24.7 feet (to building) and 16 feet (to pavement), a rear (south) setback of five feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of four feet (to pavement), a rear (south) setback of 22 feet (to pavement) and a side (east) setback of 41.6 feet (to building) and five feet (to pavement), a building height of 49 feet (to midpoint of roof) and 91 parking spaces under the provisions of Community Development Code Sections 2-504.F and 2-704.C as a residential infill project and comprehensive infill redevelopment project respectively and a reduction to interior landscape requirements from 10 percent to 5.5 percent, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from 10 feet to five feet, a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from 10 feet to four feet and a reduction to the rear (south) landscape buffer from 10 feet to five feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any permit, a Declaration of Unity of Title combining parcels 23-29-15-29034-000-0060 and 23-29-15-00000-210-0310 be recorded in the public records and a copy of said recorded document be provided to the Planning and Development Department; 2. That a six foot, PVC vinyl fence be installed on the east side of the property; 3. That, prior to the Certificate of Occupancy, all utility and communication lines be placed underground and electric panels and boxes be painted the same color as the building; 4. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum of six feet in height; and 7. The final design and color of the building be consistent with t plan~~jjs p /ro ec~ y the CDB. Pre ared b Plannm and Develo ment De artment Staff: /~~~ p Y g P P ~ C A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III ATTACHMENTS:Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-09033 -Page 10 of 10 Resume A. Scott Kurleman 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4553 scott.kurleman(a,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III • Planner II August 2008 to present June 2005 to August 2008 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. • Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005 Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private properties. • Account Manager Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993 - 1996 Groveland, FL Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan. Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees. • Licensed Marketing Representative Allstate Insurance Company 1991 - 1993 Clearwater, FL Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance. • Store Manager William Natorp company, Inc. 1983 - 1991 Cincinnati, OH Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products. EDUCATION GRADUATE -Certificate: Community Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BS in Sustainability Management, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Graduated 1998. Major: Management. AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER, Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in Arboriculture. ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414. c^i ~ Q O F- ¢ ~ ¢ a ~ a U TURNER ST b IE rt v a °o Z o z Lr~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ Z '~ c ~ PINE ~ ST w 5 ~ z o ~ z 3 U ~ t51 7 o d o a JASMINE WAY JASMINE WAY Ks/sFCns ru .•.: •.: ,• m e a ~ ~ m +,~ Q Q MAGNOLIA DR ~ ~:':~ .'~: ~ Y CY C9 tal Q U Ssrvtlsm rre '• ., ' A .. ~ ~ U ~ GAAGPdOUA ~ w w g LOTUS PATH r a Z MA LOTUS PATH ~ LO7U~ w CL j ~ ~ ¢ aFfa4stons / ~ ~ ~ ~ x BUDLEIGH ST g w / ~ 1 a _> J ST JEFFORDS ST J.:':'. L JEFFORDS S 7 J ST BA~y ST BAR Y RD ~'ti u_ _ L ~~ Si w ~ Z ~QQ - -~.: ~„-,..;^:; ""•;-.'. r-.:::. ~.::y:{ ESTELLE PROJECT '.::';.~..;.;_, ::':'::: : - . : ,:::.:= >::.:: .• a o BROWNING SITE ~':`;: •;:::::`::~.~.-:::::::,:~ ':::~'~ ~ V •^ : ~ ' ' - ~ ~ ~ ~ , ..:.: E: i.. CR~88 LAKEVIE'Ud RO ........: . •-•:::~r ~:'' ~ '~ : '-.::-: : : ': J -' - - - - --- - - ~. 1 //1 - / - o PIORM1iANDY PARK DR - ~--':~':..;.•;':,;:;'.':•.;.}?;':;•• ~ ~"~~ . ... . •. . is O 5 - -:~~; ~ - ~r- _ ,~ - i`c a - ~ - • - - - :: - ~~;_~:. - - _ :;:i ~: ~~~ - - - - _ .~{~~ - - .~~.' . -, :. y;Y~4 - ~~'. `r'te: •-.'.: •; ,• J~{~ - G~:;.`:;is'i= ' ;i;:• •:.:;?}::` ~ :: , , ,-.., , , •.•.- LOCATION MAP Owner: 08~P Investments of Tampa, Inc; Case: FLD2009-09033 RLI Beneficial Acquisitions, LLC Site: 1225 S. Highland Avenue Property Size: 3.22 Acres 1541 Bar Rd PIN: 23-29-15-29034-000-0060 Atlas Page: 307A 23-29-15-00000-210-0310 no W ~ 11os 110 110 W 1111 111 1111 Y W Q O Z ~ lzoo 1201 121z y ~ c°po ~ o co n n O p p n ~ BARRY 1225 122 1227 123 ; 1231 Q 123 3 1235 W 1239 124 Y Q 1243 124 1247 124 1251 125 125 1255 126j ~2 6~y. N N V rn ~o o v N ~ h ~ ZONING MAP Owner: 08~P Investments of Tampa, Inc; Case: FLD2009-09033 RLI Beneficial Acquisitions, LLC Site: 1225 S. Highland Avenue Property Size: 3.22 Acres 1541 Bar Rd PIN: 23-29-15-29034-000-0060 Atlas Page: 307A 23-29-15-00000-210-0310 h h ~~ 0 0 HDR 2 ,~° N N N O N h u~'J ~ p ~ ~ h h JEFFORDS ST O p N O ~~-- ~ h r ~ BARRY RD ~° ,~ ~ a o ~ h ~ h TUSCOLA RD 1240 1235 ~ci 1242 R 1235 ,244 1246 1235 .::;::r..:.' :'.-"' .:..:.:::.....:::.. .. ..-- 1250 fi._.~I,•.•~.,.-...'..:~:;:....-;_..::'.;•:;'.; ;r:;: =N ~n 1259 :.;~ ~•. ~. ~ 1256 1235 N ':'•.'~.~t_~~QN'~:/C~s~:;:'_•~~;'--:~':~::- 1258 1260 1267 •~:~~•' ;:.,n'.'.::~.'•~ er ry~~.'-:'~.•- 1260 - ~: :'; .ti -~'` _' ':•r•:' :'ti; :: •:~,'~ •' - 1262 ~ - - 1269 1235 ~ _ - 1266 1268 ::• ::;: ••;'.~:.:;: -~~•.'.:i:~ :......::..: : '. 126 :•i-:`~~ :•{'';:•~' o;:`•:;°s •;c 1270 ':. t •..•...•..-.: .:' ~.. ; .:: •. ;•;;.,-: O 1280 10 12 110 13 1105 ~~ 11 11 13 11 1111 71 F~ 7111 1z m 1z to so .`; 411.4 ~ R A ip ~ v.- ~ p v ~ v ~ (~ftices 143 145 147 149 151 ,s312o W ~ r ssos 1zo1 ~ L 14~ 14~ 148 1s0~ 157 154121 Q ~ ~ ~ n ~ 2 BARR Y ST = ~~~~ Retail Sales/Service ~ ~ 1Y 122- -~ ~' 1223 12 29034 ~ 12 _ _ 12 1 ~ 12 112 1231 23 123 11 1ss - - r12 - - 68 12 ~ 1235 I A 45063 ~ ~~ so ~ 1231~o ts7 q 12 ~ - Attached Dwellings s2 109 1243 ;24 125 45065 12 O ts6 ~ 12~~6 - - 125 9a 107 125 r- ~ ~ 1251 159 125 - 4 - L4.5067 12 - - 128 128 125 1255 128 ~ ~~3 160 128 1289 3 L 128 1 s ~? ~ Yo4 126 128 A - - - - - ~ a+ rn ~3 127 r -~ v 8 h ~ ~ ~ h ~ h r ~ ' a1 a2 0 ~ ~ y y o c ~ z z h ,r N 1 n ~ OV NI ^ ^48 y ' ems- ~ 215.8 r' ~o.ss t3 ~ L13581 ~1 ~ ~ ' ~ 81 80 79 78 9 ~ 70 ~ ~ 71 N 72 ~ 73 h 57.ST ~' ° x ^ ~ ~ BARRY RD s g F 6 C \> ~ ~ 69 68 66 6''` 64 Detached soy ss Dwellings se ^ s9 ~ h 2 TUSCOLA RD ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ h h h 1235 ' ~ ~ ' 1 - - 53 52 51 50 49 1 48 235 1 ::'.: i :'': ~::: ~:: ~ '~''~~yf ~35 ~ ~:. - -;:;: ~~ . .- az taTZs ~ r 101 1oz 1s1 1277 L9034 ~ z I a :-~:c :":"i<,{:::;.''.::'~:~: ~(1S, iIK;R ~U:::_i; - - I O I N - •~.as~n, -:,,'~, - ~~-Oylt:: '.•'.•11iyy:.~: , :1e1:~~yy:: c ~ 2 ~ 1 ~ ~~~ ~ 118 :::w.: ;:;;~:t .:.~: x::.r-..:;~:: ~ 128 O z ~/ :%':4i;~}.~:•-..`:z_:°:.e:~3:,}}f '.:r`<~ :':~~?':. •:6::j EXISTING SURROUNDING USES Owner: 08~P Investments of Tampa, Inc; Case: FLD2009-09033 RLI Beneficial Acquisitions, LLC Site: 1225 S. Highland Avenue Property Size: 3.22 Acres 1541 Bar Rd PIN: 23-29-15-29034-000-0060 Atlas Page: 307A 23-29-15-00000-210-0310 ~.. t.rs „~"'.~ !/' ~ ~r abject property looking across Barry Street. ~~' ypa Mi ~' ~ M= 1225 S. Highland Avenue FLD2009-09033 West side of subject property. Attached Dwellings to the south. Rear (east) side of subject property. --_- -~ -r - ~ u ,... , rc '~ .. ,.. :;: a` Looking west down Barry Street. ~r -~ r ~: ~~ ~~ ~ ) / __ _ ._..s_ 1'I~.IC11~1 Ul,il'I across the street from the subject Property. on the west side of Highland Avenue. 1225 S. Highland Avenue FLD2009-09033 Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone : 7 2 7-562-4567 Fax: 727-5f2-4065 d SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION D SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and /application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets Q' SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential infill Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE ®R PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-; APPLICANT NAME: Pine - Bemr Senior Limited Partnership MAILING ADDRESS: 2206 JO-an DfIVe, Sarasota, Florida 34231 PHONE NUMBER: 941-929-1270 FAX NUMBER: g41-929-1271 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): O & P Investments of Tampa, Inc. List ALL owners on the deed RLI Beneficial Acquisitions LLC AGENT NAME: David L. BIIyeU, P.E. -Gulf Coast Consulting Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 13825 ICOt BOUIEVard, Suite 605, Clearwater, Florida 33760 PHONE NUMBER: 727-524-1818 FAX NUMBER: 727-524-6090 CELL NUMBER: 727-644-7085 _ _ EMAIL: dbilyeu@gulfcoastconsultinginc.COm B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Plne Bent/ SenlOf Apartments PROJECT VALUATION: $ 7.65M STREET ADDRESS 1225 South Highland Avenue PARCEL NuMBER(s): 23/29/15/29034/000/0060 and 23/29/15/00000/21010310 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 3.22 ACreS PARCEL SIZE (square feet}: 140.263 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached legal description(in Survey) PROPOSED usE(s): Attached dwellings (Senior Apartments) DESCRIPTION of REQUEST: Approval for up to 85 attached multi-family units (senior apartments) on 3.22 acres zoned Specifically identify the request C and HDR. Flexibility to increase height from 30 feet maximum to 48 feet, to reduce (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all parking from 170 spaces to 94 spaces, reduction in front setback from 25 feet to 15 feet requested code deviations; e.g. (to parking), side setback from 10 feet to 7 feet (to sidewalk) reduction in required number of parking spaces specific use, etc.) C9Documents and Settingslderek.ferguson~Desktoplplanning tlept forms 0706~esiaentiai mnu rm~ect trw~ tuua w- i ~.aoc Page 1 of 8 1 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _/ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C./PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ~" SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D./WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) O' Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The area contains mixed-use including retail, offices and multi-family residential uses. Some uses are multi- story attached dwellings, that the proposed 4 story re-development will be in harmony with the density of 26.6 units /acre is similar to adjacent residential properties zoned HDR. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Adjacent properties are fully developed. The site currently contains a defunct bowling alley /sports bar and is an eyesore. The re-development into a senior housing will improve the appearance, therefore improving property values rather than impair values. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed senior housing complex will not adversely affect health /safety of persons living or working in the neighborhood. Senior housing is quiet, low-activity and usually generates low traffic volume. The re-development will replace a defunct bowling alley /sports bar. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The 85-unit attached senior residential complex would generate only 296 daily vehicle trips, 11 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 14 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour per ITE Trip Generation, 8th.Edition Land Use ,' Code 252. This is minimal. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The community consists of multi-family residential structures as well as retail (office structures. The proposed 4 story apartment building is consistent with the community character. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The design provides for large building setbacks of 42 feet to the east, where the site abuts single-family homes. Tfn setbacks along the north side (15 feet to parking) abuts a public roadway (Barry Streef) and therefore minimzes affects on surrounding properties. Landscape buffers are provided on all perimeters. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning deptfonns 0706\Residential Infill Project(E1.R) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRI ~ EN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to The seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. The flexibility in height from 30 feet to 48 feet is necessary to achieve reasonable density as permitted in HDR zoning, while simultaneously providing adequate open space, adequate parking and drainage retention. The flexibility in parking is necessary to provide open space and meet special requirements Tor seniors. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and The proposed value of the site with the improvements.) The existing site has a just market value of $850,000 +/- with the proposed re{ieveloprnanttbe value is expected to be $ 7.65M. The re-development will eliminate an unsightly defunct bowling apey /sports bar. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Attached dwellings are a permitted use in the HDR zoning district. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed senior housing complex is compatible with adjacent uses which indude multi-story attached residential uses, retail uses and some single-family detached uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The existing defunct bowling alley /sports bar and expansive asphalt parking lot is unsightly. The re-development th include new landscaping, buffers, and a new building will be an upgrade to the site and area. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the comrrtunity character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The design enhances community character by reducing curb cuts Pram 5 to 2, provides for ample building setbacks as compared to current condition, increases open space, provides entry feature ponds, and a new building to upgrade the area. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The flexibility regarding height (48 feet to mid point) is justified since it is lower than many uses in the area, the proposed building setbacks are greater on the north, west, and south than e~dsiung building setbacks. Reduced parking is justified by Parking Analysis and reduces impervious surface. C:\Documants and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 0706\Residential Infill Project (F[.D) 2008 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storlrn Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) v~A S'TOIZMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shalt provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Exisfing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; / Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; p All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; i p Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Ci/ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Proposed storrnwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; 4 Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD} PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A) p/ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; f1 TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4' or greater), and location, including drip tines and indicating trees to be removed) ;please design around the existing trees; r 9/ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; p' PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards tie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:\DOCUments and Battingslderek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Residential Vnfill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; ~_ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ~ All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; ~_ All required setbacks; ,/ All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including ~ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and san""nary sewer fines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; ~ All parking spaces, driveways, loading. areas_and.vehicular use.areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening ~ {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; _// Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and oftsite storm-water management facilities; ~ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; ~ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and / Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level One (flexible standard development) and Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is ~/~ required for any parking garage requiring a Level One (minimum standard and flexible standard) or Level Two approval. d clrF nATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: ~ Land area in square feet and acres; -7 Number of EXISTING dwelling units; ~ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; -~ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the ,/ number of required spaces; / Total paved area, including all saved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; ~ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; ~- Building and structure heights; ~i Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and -'~_ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/: X 11 }; EXISTING 3.22 acres N/A N/A 27,537 s.f 180 spaces 19.3 feet 0.20 REQUIRED PROPOSED 15,000 s.f min 3.22 acres N/A N/A 86 D.U. max 85 D.U. 170 spaces 94 spaces 'in feet max NIA FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; 7 offsite elevations ff required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural ovefiangs; 4$ feet N/A C:\Documents and Settingslderek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\ResidenUal Infi1{ Project (l=LD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of i3 N. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; ~ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ~ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ~ Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; ~ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; / Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; ,/ Interior landscaping-areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and ~ percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. W REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/=X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated wdh the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A.23) 4r' BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; ~ All sides of all buildings; ~_ Dimensioned; ~ Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/: X 11~. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/~ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Setfings\derek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning deptfomu 0708\Residential infill i'roject {EZD) 2008 07-11.dx Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ^ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting' held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) / Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. p'/ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Appiicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections idenYrfied in the Scoping Meeting. Trafnc Impact study is not required. Not required. See Traffic Assessment CA ON - IF. APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine 'rf any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with th~04 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Ack dgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Ffow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAiUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. !f you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS in this application are true and accurate to the best of my Swom to and ubscribed before me this 1 day of knowle uthorize City representatives to visit and S~~~t.nn~ / . A.D. 20 O 4 to me and/or by ph graph the roperty described in this application. ,who is personally known has Signature of property owner or representative My commission Chentat Vachon p/ly Commission C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Residential i~t Foject (FL.D) 2008 07-11.doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AI.iTFiORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: Eugene O'Steen RLI Beneficial Acquisitions LLC 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 1225 South Highland Avenue 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible Development Residential Infill. 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Mr. David L. Bilyeu, P.E. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the under gned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Properly Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I r efore me t~~h,,Ce undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of theTStatepof Flori/da, on t`his~ p( day of Cr b0 personally appeared ~/~R''1-J / ~1~T~~'`~ w'ho having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. """" J. VAN HQRN ~ r Commission DD 760171 ~ ~~~~~ ~~ " ' ;~ F~pires February 19, ^c012 ~ic/~G ' ' ~~ BondedThmT~oyFelnlnsuranoe800.3A5.7013 i ' ~,p~~t Notary Public gnature n s} ,, Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: ~~ o~'~ ~O'\ ~- C:1Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Deskfoplplanning daptforms 0708\Residential Infill Proied (FLD) 2006 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 , . N. AFFtDAVtT TO AI.1TFiORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: Eugene O'Steen Don Paxton 2. That (I am/we are} the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 1225 South Highland Avenue 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible Development Residential Infill. 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (doesldo) appoint: Mr. David L. Bilyeu, P.E. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. Th e), the undersigned ho y hereb certi that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ~.-G., day of Before me the undersigned, an officer duty commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ~ ~ 1~ __ 6 a personally appeared _~~ 4if.__~_ L ~S ~ rr,,,~-~ wha having been first duly sworn f the affidavit that he/she sin Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents o 9 :~t~"'~°~e~,; !rya Knauer ~~ ;- ,;~ ,pion fi QQ5505®5 i - a o i r l ~' S D it 113573 ~ -- -- h ' +~~ ~'r iirCS ~Q~~2®1~ 'PPrfB~FFt~ ~^.~,,,,,,,.~~ Notary Public Signature Notary SeaUStamp My Commission Expires: C:1Documents and Settingsltlerek.fergusonlDesktop~planning deptfonns 0708\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 `Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 d SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION !~/ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ©/SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials}: DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Tnfill Project (Revised 07/11/2008} PLEASE TYPE ®R PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Pine - Bens Senior Limited Partnership MAILING ADDRESS: 2206 JO-an Df7Ve, Sarasota, Florida 34231 PHONE NUMBER: 941-929-1270 FAX NUMBER: 941-929-1271 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): f~ & P InV25tmentS Of Tampa, Inc. List ALL owners on the deed ~RLI Beneficial Acquisitions LLC AGENT NAME: DeVld L. BIIyeU, P.E. -Gulf Caast Consulting Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 13825 ICOt BOUIEVard, Suite 605, Clearwater, Florida 33760 PHONE NUMBER: 727-524-1818 FAX NUMBER: 727-524-6090 CELL NUMBER: 72.7-644-7085 - _ EMAIL: dbllyeU@gUlfcoastCOnSUItinglrlC.COm B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Pine Berry Senior Apartments PROJECT VALUATION: $ 7.65M STREET ADDRESS 1225 South Highland Avenue PARCEL NUMBER(s): 23/29/15/29034/000/0060 and 23/29/15/00000/210/0310 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 3.22 ACreS PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 140,263 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached legal deSCriptlOn(In SUrVey) _ PROPOSED USE(S): /-~ttaChed dWellingS (SenlOr Apartments) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Approval for Up to $5 attached mUltl-fan Specifically identify the request C and HDR. Flexibility to increase heic (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all parking from 170 spaces to 94 spaces requested code deviations; e.g. (to parking), side setback from 10 feet reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Iv units (senior apartments) on 3.22 acres zoned It from 30 feet maximum to 48 feet, to reduce reduction in front setback from 25 feet to 15 feet C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept Corms ^iuts~rcesiaennai mnu rmiecc \rw~ ~uua u~-~ i.uoo Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A P DEVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YE5 _ NO ~(if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C./PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) 8" SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) G!' Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The area contains mixed-use including retail, offices and multi-family residential uses. Some uses are multi- story attached dwellings, that the proposed 4 story re-development will be in harmony with the density of 26.6 units /acre is similar to adjacent residential properties zoned HDR. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Adjacent properties are fully developed. The site currently contains a defunct bowling alley /sports bar and is an eyesore. The re-development into a senior housing will improve the appearance, therefore improving property values rather than impair values. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed senior housing complex will not adversely affect health /safety of persons living or working in the neighborhood. Senior housing is quiet, low-activity and usually generates low traffic volume. The re-development will replace a defunct bowling alley /sports bar. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The 85-unit attached senior residential complex would generate only 296 daily vehicle trips, 11 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 14 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour per ITE Trip Generation, 8th.Edition Land Use Code 252. This is minimal. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The community consists of multi-family residential structures as well as retail /office structures. The proposed 4 story apartment building is consistent with the community character. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The design provides for large building setbacks of 42 feet to the east, where the site abuts single-family homes. TIC setbacks along the north side (15 feet to parking) abuts a public roadway (Barry Street) and therefore minimzes affects on surrounding properties. Landscape buffers are provided on all perimeters. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Residentlal Infill Proiect 1~) 2008 07-11.doc Page ? of 8 WRI ~ Ell SUBMI"T"TAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential InfTll Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain hoax each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. The flexibility in height from 30 feet to 48 feet is necessary to achieve reasonable density as permitted in HDR zoning, while simultaneously providing adequate open space, adequate parking and drainage retention. The flexibility in parking is necessary to provide open space and meet special requiremerrts for seniors. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) The existing site has a just market value of $850,000 +/- with the proposed re-development the value is expected to be $ 7.65M. The re-development will eliminate an unsightly defunct bowling easy /sports bar. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Attached dwellings are a permitted use in the HDR zoning district. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed senior housing complex is compatible with adjacent uses which indude mulfi-story attached residential uses, retail uses and some single-family detached uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The existing defunct bowling alley /sports bar and expansive asphalt parking lot is unsightly. The re-development to include new landscaping, buffers, and a new building will be an upgrade to the site and area. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the imrediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The design enhances community character by reducing curb cuts from 5 to 2, provides for ample building setbacks as compared to current condition, increases open space, provides entry feature ponds, and a new building to upgrade the area. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The flexibility regarding height (48 feet to mid point) is justified since it is lower than many uses in the area, the proposed building setbacks are greater on the north, west, and south than existing building setbacks. Reduced parking is justified by Parking Analysis and reduces impervious surface. C:1Documents and SettingsWerek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0706\Residential innll Projsd (FSD) 2006 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL Manual and 4-202.A.21) (City of Clearwater Stor¢n Drainage Design Criteria ©/A STi ORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearvuater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ~, At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; / Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; p All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; i p Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control shucture; ~f/ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control shucture; R' Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT / SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), "rf applicable 0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): ' stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE RE(2UIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A) Q / SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; t1 TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4' or greater), and location, including drip Lines and indicating trees to be removed) ;please design around the existing trees; a TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a/"certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; Q~ LOCAT{ON MAP OF THE PROPERTY; p'' PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:1Documenis and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL. REt~UIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _~ Index s~~eet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; ~_ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ~ All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; ,/ All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; ~ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlffe habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer fines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; / All parking spaces, driveways, loading. areas.and.vehicular use.areas; / Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening / {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index#701}; _// Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; J Location of all outdoor fighting fixtures; ~ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and / Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level One (flexible standard development) and Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is / / required for any parking garage requiring a Level One (minimum standard and flexible standard) or Level Two approval. IY ~ITF DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: ~ Land area in square feet and acres; _~ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; ~ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; ~_ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the ,/ number of required spaces; / Total paved area, including all Javed parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; ~ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; ~- Building and structure heights; ~/ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and ~- Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential us?s. EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED 3.22 acres 15,000 s.f min 3.22 acres N/A N/A N/A N/A 86 D.U. max 85 D.U. 27,537 s.f 180 spaces 170 spaces 94 spaces ' r 19.3 feet 30 feet max 48 feet 0.20 N/A N/A l~ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth orwater retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural ovefiangs; C:1Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708\Residential Infi11 Project (F[.D) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAP@NG FLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; ~ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ,/ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ~/ Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; ~ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripiines (as indicated on required _ tree survey); Location, size, and quantifies of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _~ schedule; / Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil motes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; ,/ Interior landscaping areas hatched andJor shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and _~ percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. W REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A.23) V' BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; ~ All sides of all buildings; ~_ Dimensioned; ~ Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); _~ Materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as abovE3 to scale on 8 Yz X 1"~. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/zX 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Settings\tlerek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708Utesidential Infi11 Project (ELD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections idenYlfied in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. Not required. See Traffic Assessment CA ON - IF .APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW GALCULATIONSI WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with th~04 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Ackraewlatdgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): (~~Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAiUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fre Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowle uthorize City representatives to visit and ph graph the ~roperty described in this application. Signature of property owners or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and ubscribed before me this 1 day of Se.~pJ',~,,,,~~/ A.D. 20 O G to me and/or by who is personally (mown has My commission -bjjc-State o Florida + " Chantal Vachon My Commiss~o ^DDS 0696 { C:\Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708\Residential Infi11 Project (FLD) 2008 07-U.doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AI.fTEiORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: Eugene O'Steen RLI Beneficial Acquisitions LLC 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 1225 South Highland Avenue 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) Flexible Development Residential Infill. 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Mr. David L. Bilyeu, P.E. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes Cify representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the under' gned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS i + vJ efore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Flori/da, on tthis~ O( ! '~ J day of ~ ~l~~d `" va'ho having been first duly sworn bQ personally appeared ~~~'1-~ ~ ys that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Depos .~; J. VAN HORN i~ti"''r~= s , :._ Commission DD 760171 -k ~ . Gt/~ '~ Expires February 19, 2012 `'~p,'~ ~ ~~ BondedThm Troy Fain Insurance 860.3A5.7019 ~; Notary Public gnature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: /~ ~ ~~ 7- C \Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 N. aFFtDavIT To aI1T~oRCZE aGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: Eugene O'Steen Don Paxton 2. That (I am/we are} the owners} and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 1225 South Highland Avenue 3. That this properly constitutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) Flexible Development Residential Infill. 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Mr. David L. Bilyeu, P.E. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. as (his/their) agents} to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. Th e), the undersigned ho y, hereb certi that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, r' , COUNTY OF PINELLA;S f ~ ~~J d ay o before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, an this }~, 1/ ~d ~ personally appeared _~ 11. G, 4~f.~`~_ ~ S ~c_-,~-~ who having been first duly sworn _ the affidavit that helshe sign I]eposes and says that hetshe fully understands the contents of ~~~Y•pUOG :r?a Knauer `.~'" """~ ~`it~....1',SIOn ~I DQ5505Q5 5+~ a =a= -`~_ •. •i:I~~ iD l1 113573 -- " 'i o- r - ' gE~,FF~~,,~ ~r,;rns5/Q9/201C Nota PubiicSi nature +rA,ri~~~,~~` ry 9 Notary SeaUStamp My Commission Expires: C:1Do:Lments and Settingslderek.ferguson~Desktoplplanning dept fortes 07081Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-t t.doc Page 8 of 8 :Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax:727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Pine -Berry Senior Limited Partnership 2206 Jo-an Drive, Sarasota, Florida 34231 941-929-1270 FAX NUMBER: 941-929-1271 EMAIL: O & P Investments of Tama inc. RLI Beneficial Acquisitions LLC David L. Bilyeu, P.E. - Gulf Coast Consulting Inc. 13625 Icot Boulevard, Suite 605, Ciearwater, Florida 33760 727-524-1818 727-644-7085 EMAIL: dbilyeuc~gulfcoastconsultinginc.com 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The proposed landscape has been enhanced over the basic requirements by providing additional shrubs and groundcovers adjacent to the parking areas. The project requires 72 trees per code and 84 have been proposed by the landscape plan within the constraints of utilities and other site conditions Palm 4roupings and accent shrubs/groundcovers have been used at the project and building main entrances to create focal points and integrated within the foundation plantings to provide landscape accents along the building facades. C:IDocuments and SettingslderekfergusonlDesktoplp/anningfomTS 07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 0424-07.doc Page 1 of 2 FAX NUMBER: 727-524-6090 2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program v~ill enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Currently adjacent to the front and northsicle of the project there is Bahia sod with little existing landscaping to visually soften the pavement or buildings of these areas. The proposed landscaping will provide trees, palms, shrubs and flowering ground covers to create aesthetic value that is not currently typical to this area along Highland Avenue and Barry Street. 3. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed landscape plan will provide enhanced landscaping along the project's right of way and main parking area. The landscaping will also create a sense of entry from Highland Avenue with the use of Washingtonia Palms, Hibiscus and other accent ground covers. This will provide and increased visual aesthetic to the area along the roadway and also provide improvements to the very limited existing landscaping of the adjacent properties. ___ 4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The proposed landscape plan provides plant materials consistent with the general corridors within the city. Landscape species such as Crape Myrtles, Washingtonia Palm, Indian Hawthorn and Hibiscus are utilized for visual accents. Live Oaks and Magnolias are utilized internally within the parking area, with the Crape Myrtles and Hollies in areas that overhead utilities prevent the use of larger canopy trees -- THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CR]TERIA. TH€ USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS /ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowl emend authorize City representatives to visit and ograph thg property described in this application. L V~ of property owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS~ Sworn to and subscribed before me this I ir~ day of Q~-~~~,/' _, A.D. 20~_ to me and/or by who is personalty known has produ as i nti at' n. ry public, My commission expires: ~ 1 ~ ~ Z~ ( 3 £ lOZ/L L/l0 sandx3 .~o'W iO3r~ 96904840UOiSSIWWO'~l~y~ a° 'rte uoy0e~ Ia~0ey0 ~, 02 epuo~~ to a;eiS o!Iq~d >vrsloN °nu ~,,~ C:IDocumerrts and SettingslderekfergusonlDeskfoplp/anningforms 07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 0¢24-07.doc Page 2 of 2 ~ h ; i ~~ j r ~: = 1t l ~.~ _ C '; ~~ Pineberry Senior North Elevation Clearwater, FL Project #: 07-2162 ova~wrxrxnlcl~nenaor~ai m.mom.darmrm.~.aw.baraunNwenur~rorn•a.r.eaia~.sdca4artaanwerq ar~auem...~.ro. Qesausarem.i.uau..w.~a.s~mrara.~uraw~rworR~"ara qr ``~ P~ ... ~ k;y K ~~ GRAPHIC SCALE FQRUM~ 20 0 10 20 40 ~ ARCHITECTURE & ~~ INTERIOR DESIGN, INC. w~a+a+c ~ aaa,"~cna+~ ~ n+,~ac"~ezw (IN FEET) »~~~„~ Wn"iYepYp,ASiOi p1n 107510.1/0 1" = 20' ~1~Sm1,u Date: 10/15/09 """""°`~°~'" '~i Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4 APPLICANT NAME: Pine -Berry Senior Limited Partnership MAILING ADDRESS: 2206 Jo-an Drive, Sarasota, Florida 34231 PHONE NUMBER: 941-929-1270 FAX NUMBER: g41-929-1271 CELL NUMBER EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): O & P Ir1V@Stment5 Of Tampa, InC. List ALL owners on the deed RLI Beneficial Acqusitions LLC AGENT NAME: David L. BIIyeU, P.E. -Gulf Coast Consulting Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 13825 ICOt BOUI2Vard, Suite 605, Clearwater, Florida 33760 PHONE NUMBER: 727-524-1818 FAX NUMBER: 727-524-6090 CELL NUMBER: 727-644-7085 EMAIL: dbllVeut~oUlfcoastconSUltlnQlnC.COm B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pine Berry Senior Apartments PROJECT VALUATION: $ 7.t)5M 1225 South Highland Avenue 23/29/15/29034/000/0060 and 23/29/15/00000/210/0310 3.22 ACreS PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 140,263 See attached lec7al description(in survey) PROPOSED usE(s): Attached dwellings (Senior Apartments) DESCRIPTION of REQUEST: Approval for up to 85 attached multi-family units (senior apartments) on 3.22 acres zone Specifically identify the request C and HDR. Flexibility to increase height from 30 feet maximum to 48 feet, to reduce (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all parking from 170 spaces to 94 spaces, reduction in front setback from 25 feet to 15 feet requested code deviations; e.g. (to parking), side setback from 10 feet to 7 feet (to sidewalk) reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C:\Documents and Settingskierek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PJ~EVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _/ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C./PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) 5~' SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D/WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) H Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The area contains mixed-use including retail, offices and multi-family residential uses. Some uses are multi- story attached dwellings, that the proposed 4 story re-development will be in harmony with the density of 26.6 units /acre is similar to adjacent residential properties zoned HDR. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Adjacent properties are fully developed. The site currently contains a defunct bowling alley /sports bar and is an eyesore. The re-development into a senior housing will improve the appearance, therefore improving property values rather than impair values. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed senior housing complex will not adversely affect health /safety of persons living or working in the neighborhood. Senior housing is quiet, low-activity and usually generates low traffic volume. The re-development will replace a defunct bowling alley /sports bar. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The 85-unit attached senior residential complex would generate only 296 daily vehicle trips, 11 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 14 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour per ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition Land Use Code 252. This is minimal. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The community consists of multi-family residential structures as well as retail /office structures. The proposed 4 story apartment building is consistent with the community character. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The design provides for large building setbacks of 42 feet to the east, where the site abuts single-family homes. Tln setbacks along the north side (15 feet to parking) abuts a public roadway (Barry Street) and therefore minimzes affects on surrounding properties. Landscape buffers are provided on all perimeters. C:\DOCUments and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) !~/Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The flexibiliy in height from 25 feet tv 48 feet in the eastern portion of the "C" zoned area is necessary to achieve reasonable density as permitted in "C" zone while providing adequate open space, parking and drainage retentiop The flexibility in parking is necessary to increase open space and meet special requirements for seniors. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district The Comprehensive Plan allows residential development up to 24 units per acre in the CG category. The community development code allows residential in the "C" zone only as a comprehensive Infill redevelopment. This is a re- development of a defunct bowling alley /sports bar and quality redevelopment is a valid purpose in the Comprehensive plan and code. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The surrounding properties are fully developed with mixed uses including multi-story residential developments. The re-development of a defunct bowling alley /sports bar with multi-family senior housing will promote orderly development. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The re-development will be on a upgrade to the property and the area as a whole and will not be a detriment. Increased landscaping, open space and construction of a new building will be an improvement. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working watertront use. The "CG" land use category allows residential development, and the "C" zoning allows residential as a flexible development (comprehensive irhfilt). The proposal is a re-developme~~t and provides affordable senior housing in an area characterized by multi-family uses and mixed uses. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The flexibility in setbacks, height and parking are reasonable and justified since the re-development will enhance the orderly development by providing increased open space, drainage retention and landscaping. The 4 story building is compatible with existing multi-story buildings. The building contains many corners and setbacks. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) m~ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surtace, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ~/ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; d/ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; M13 All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; 67 ~ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ®~ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT / SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable FY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) 0/ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; GY TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4° or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ~~ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4° DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ^~OCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not evictions to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:\Documents and Settings\CJerek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ~ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; ~ North arrow; ./ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ~ All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ~- Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; ~_ All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; / All required sight triangles; Identfication of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; / Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _~ and water lines; / All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; ~ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening _~ {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; ,/ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and ~loor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. 3 SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: / Land area in square feet and acres; / Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; / Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; ~ OfAcial records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; ~ Building and structure heights; ~ Impermeable surtace ratio (I.S.R.); and ,/ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED 3.22 acres 15.000 s.f min 3.22 acres N/A N/A N/A N/A 86 D.U. max 85 D.U. 27.537 s.f 180 spaces 170 spaces 94 spaces 19.3 feet 30 feet max 48 feet 0.20 N/A N/A FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; / Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; / Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ,//Streets and drives (dimensioned); / Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); ,Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) Ci" LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; ~ Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ~_ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ~ Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; ~ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant ~ schedule; ~ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; ~ Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and _~ percentage covered; ~ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. C~' REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) 13 BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: ~ All sides of all buildings ~ Dimensioned ~/Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) / Materials RE'r]UCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/z X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Settingslderek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: ^ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ^ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ~F]~ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact study is not required. Not required. See Traffic Assessment CA ION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ~ ~~ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is included. Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is not required. i CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQ~IJIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowled a and authorize City representatives to visit and pho ph the property described in this application. h ~ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL~ Swom to an subscribed before me this -j_ day of ~e~.l-G~/ , A.D. 20 to me and/or by who is personally known has Signature of property owner br representative ~'~"`~~' "~"~"~' ,~ .~~ Q M Commission DC I My commission expir .~ ~ o y . t~ ~ (I ~ ~ 9TF~F fl,0~ Expires 01/11/2013 C:1Documents and Settingskferek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: Eugene O'Steen Don Paxton 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 1225 South Highland Avenue 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible Development Residential Infill. 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Mr. David L. Bilyeu, P.E. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That ), the undersigned autho certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property wn Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ~ ~ ~'~ day of Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ~s ~rt n ~ ~-f~ ~°j personally appeared L_ i~:.~ 4~ ~ ~ /S~ `c~+~__ who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. bli Si P t t gna ure u c ary ~iHa {(Hauer o Notary Seal/Sf us ~,, My Commission Expires: ___ __ ,-. R,r,;ssion #f pD55050 r: L.KGlircl~ Ga/09/~0141 ,.a~+~c F~/QF1l,`~. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: Eugene O'Steen RLI Beneficial Acquisitions LLC 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 1225 South Highland Avenue 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible Development Residential Infill. 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Mr. David L. Bilyeu, P.E. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersign authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ,~ Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS lorida, on his ~ day of f F of the Stat o officer duly commissione by the law s , an fore me the undersigned ,, ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ / n w G7~~ personally appeared ~/T~~ ~!"~`X~- ~ ~ who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. i~Y:P" J. VAN HORN =~•' ; . :~: .*: Commission DD 760171 ~= Expires February 19, 2012 ~'%~P f~°t BondeAThruTroyFelnlnsuranceeW-385.701 , 9 Notary Publi Signat ~~r Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: v ! ' ~ ~~~~ C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 r~ PARKING STUDY FOR PINE BERRY SENIOR APARTMENTS HIGHLAND AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: PINE BERRY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LLC PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. AUGUST 2009 PROJECT # 09-014 Robert Pergolizz', AI PTP AICP # 9023 /PTP #1 3 I. INTRODUCTION The project is proposed to contain 85 apartments age restricted to senior citizens. The site is located on the southeast corner of Highland Avenue and Barry Street in Clearwater. (See Figure 1) The redevelopment of this site to contain senior apartments is the subject of a Residential Infill and Comprehensive Infill redevelopment application in the HDR and C zoning districts. This project requires a parking analysis. Based on the City of Clearwater requirements, on-site parking should include two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit and therefore the requirement is 170 parking spaces. The applicant believes this requirement is not applicable to senior restricted living units and has provided data from other senior housing complexes it owns and manages throughout the nation. This analysis was prepared to demonstrate the actual parking demand for the proposed senior housing complex. II. PARKING SUPPLY After redevelopment the site will contain 94 parking spaces which is a ratio of 1.1 spaces per dwelling unit. III. PARKING DEMAND The redevelopment will contain 85 apartments and will have access from Highland Avenue and Barry Street. The apartment complex will not have any central dining or medical facilities or offer housekeeping services requiring full-time staff, however, three (3) employees are expected periodically to perform maintenance and property management services. The proposed development is anactive-senior apartment complex where the residents are independent to come and go as they please. Historical data has shown seniors, whether living alone or as a mature couple, typically maintain ownership of one-vehicle. In some instances they are no longer driving due to medical. or age restrictions and therefore do not possess a vehicle and rely on mass-transit or others for transport. This has been recognized by ITE. The proposed development was analyzed using ITE Parking Generation, 3rd Edition Land Use Code 252 (Senior Adult Housing -Attached) and demonstrates a parking ratio of 0.50 spaces per unit. Using this data the project would require as few as 43 parking spaces. Beneficial Communities owns and operates several senior housing sites in Florida and elsewhere in the United States. Appendix A contains data from ITE and other Florida municipalities where the parking requirement for senior housing is one (1) space per unit. In addition, Beneficial Communities supplements its rental agreements stipulating it will issue one (1) parking space per rental unit. Beneficial Communities has typically provided between one (1) and 1.1 parking spaces per rental unit, and this has accommodated residents, visitors, and occasional employee parking needs. 1 N N n V' O O N of CT LION PROJECT LOCATION - PINE BERRY APARTMENTS rRO.rECTNO: 09-014 DATE: FIGURE: Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting 8/2009 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. III. CONCLUSION Based on the data provided in ITE Parking Generation, 3rd Edition, data presented by the applicant and the rental agreement, and parking codes from other Florida municipalities, the appropriate parking ratio for this project is between 1 - 1.1 spaces per unit. As such the project should provide between 85 and 94 parking spaces. The parking supply provided on the site plan is adequate to accommodate the parking needs of this project. 2 ~PE+ IiT~lf~ A . Land Use: 252 Senior Adult Housing-Attached Land Use Description Senior adult housing consists of attached independent living developments, including retirement communities, age-restricted housing and active adult communities. These developments may include limited social or recreational services. However, they generally lack centralized dining and on-site medical facilities. Residents in these communities live independently, are typically active (requiring little to no medical supervision) and mayor may not be retired. Congregate care facility (Land Use 253) and continuing care retirement community (Land Use 255) are related uses. Database Description The database consisted of two study sites. • The study sites had 46 and 91 dwelling units. • Parking supply ratio: 1.2 and 1.4 s aces per dwelli ~/ Weekday peak parking demand ratio: 0.50 and 0.~ `ETC 91-unit sites, respectively. • Saturday pea par ing errand ratio: 0.50 an . 91-unit sites, respectively. unit, res ecu parked vehicles per dwefiing unit at the 46-and vehicles per dwelling unit at the 46- and Parking demand counts were submitted for the hours beginning at 9:00 a.m., 10:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. From these limited data, no definitive peak hour or peak period was established. Study Sites/Years Huntington Beach, CA (1989) Parking Generation, 3rd Edition f a :~ 4r~' } ~." ((a ;~~~7t~r1~('~c:r '~ r ~~~~ ;`a~F, VtiliJRiar€a ~Q'~f'C~ Pl~F9TYGrtiK~ ~GrP-~tTSr ~ir~ti~ of OCcht~ Pfar~nir~~ C~artm~i'it Ogg ~darth V+Iast ~dh A~rer~aie E~~e~~r7at7ee, Flarid~ 3~g7~ 1~~; f~ureC C~a~s ;aenitrr Apa.rtrrments I~~'aP far, Ra~c~: "i"t~aatt~ you far e s~pprartunat7,~ tra e~Cs~s e~~r pins. to de~~Jcrp the L~at~eal: t7a1ts: niar >rtar~~,r~t~ CtCtchat+, ~Jc~rda: U^J~ aCsta ue~dersta;nd ik7aJ: ~riaur offices +rrilC be respartsi#~f~ fir €l~e dattirtatian of Jfte paskirrg space r~c,.ctuirerr~nts for crur P~Pose'd d~~i~i~rn~rst Si~,~ ~~ plair~nit~g dizparfrrrtt i'~as drrrijried 1<hat our a~nt~r apartri'ex~t f~lii~+ €ioes na~t Il1ec`J r~]'t'~l txf f~i~ cati~'1~5 ift ~1° ex~n~ ~, ash fry prp~,~idA sc+me ir~i!~rrr~ati~5n ~ aC~1 ~rau in your d~terrninataQrt. Deve[~pmen~i; ~verr~i~w 'Cf~e buret teaks Set~'sor Apartrt~t d~r~fr~p~sent is c~esgn~i frir adtJVe seniors. v~itty mcad~ ~~edes. The d~e€aprner~t wiiC be rested to resid~ttt~ age ~~ grid ter Leith an ~x~ tned`tan a~ irJ" ~~ C3eneiaf's erdi;ae l~euetaprr~er~t concept l~ deslg-reed #~ pramt7#e Cntera~ticu~ ~mc~n~ ~: ses~d~~ by providi~ig sp~rat~us and ir~vifing~ ~mrncxt ~ra=as an~i ~ordinaterf ccrrr~rr~un~y acti+ritise~, The d~[cap~~rrt is des. igrsed tti ores a cognpk-te cr~rt~rnuni~r fc~r tt~e resJderzi~ that prawhd~ stale Df ~~ 7tt fi.,ites far Serti~3~S Irk tt'I£'>ir a'v1Pi! buildirfg: Stye cif ~e ~Je~rtilrapanent f~atuc Jrt~c3ude securest ae~ss s~urity s~st~m, an-site ~rnrr~.rnity rooms iti~ Icien; laundry f~:i6r~es, air c4nditianed ~m~n ~r~asr or7-sCt~ ar~arcarn#. ry, rev theaCar Ica and a beauiy satin. ach unit features cent~t air c~andituoning; ~aIJ-JrCr-C ca~r~< sta~caiafe s~her artd drgtdr hat~k~sp, c~i~i~vrasher, starve, ~efnges~tsse, disprssaf anti pcin Ord wamfetg s~sli~rrt. artist r~r~~kerii~g ~t ~r typical sertiar deveitr~rrr~rrt is attached sr ya€~r in€cumafirri_ Parking needs raeficiai: has pint together an ~expe~rierrc~zt team of ~s~~ineers, sites ~~~ ~e L'?esign prr~f~ssiortats tcx create a ~e~ ~ammtaat,ty far tFr~ sertie~rs oi` f;}pfseet:hbti~e_ Tk~~ prini*ipel t~ tt~a e companies C7at~e decides of e;~p~rienr..e Cn ~rair respe~five fields riTdxt~g tfte d~ve(oprnt of rrtu;tifert~ily anti sersinr housing across Ili nation. dur extensive er„peruse ~~~~ me d~rettapri~ertt and rr~anagernent t~f ~er'~icr hou:sir#g J`aat~i['sties ir~rsicates oaf 1 parking spy pe.r t~r~it plus art a;le~wranCe t 4t3°fU fc~r staff anti vistars is mare thaJ1 suffacien# to rrreef the parking reeds of ptipa~latir~n. In-fact r~ur sertic~r e~sidant r~ntak agreem~rrt aClart ft~r arse paricin~ spy pEr apartn~eni unit. .'? additic~€~a! su,pprart of t;7° at~t~ve parking starfdards v~+e vvisf~ to bring, ~e fealJti~a~ittg to yt~dr att~'ftirn: ~n inc~aper~de€~t Rrdusby research report fiat seniae apar~ents shrn+t an average peak par;cing demand €~f Lt_eta~ spades per urtit_ The r~rct'E apart ircl~trl~s riderits," emptQy~ ci7d ~isi~srs_ (see attacl ke~tf artc;e} - ~~r~t Fiar`i cities such ~s P~t~"tk ~s'~~~ ~c~ral ~}~rirsc~~ ~rf~ich E`i~~~ sp~~~c ~ru~~:~s <n ~Fi~ic ~d~ ~r senor de~~ti~prrt~nts s€~~i~y 't pas~csna, sg~c~ per u~titw !n fit, ~ pity ~€ J~:t~s~lf ~llcr~r5~ fcr 9 sc~e far ~ tlkveiling ~nat~. ~s.~. (~.5 ~~~s i~r ssrti~~. ~~€r illa~,~s Senicsr Ag~a~atrr~er+ts, a ~?e~ilar ~0 t~sait cf~~eiap~ent in ~e~i~s~s~rt P~~nsy~ani~k has 1 ~1 par4~Er~g spas fir ~~ units ~ddition~ll~,: cur ~ay~t P~Ims S~t~ior ;~,p~~n~ts. ~ s'u~itar ~6 unit de~~r~ie~rrrt in T°itusui6i~; r9t~rPda his 7Q~ parking spay {ter ~~ units. li5 T~C[I„IC3r~, 1~l,[r prt~at ~S~S ~!' {E;~G~t°I~`1 apartrT'kerut ur3ats ~~d are propc~s~rt ~ f~it~it c~ `'} ~rkis~ spaces fs~r~e ~t~cs,P~ r~i'~rera~ d~u~l~sprn~r~t; Tha~rk ~~ca fir t~~ ~pp~cttarsity ~ p+rcrr~d~ a~~rr irsps~t ari thin m~~r, @f y~au i~ati+~ any q€tit3r~s ~ r~ i`urth~rdc~~m~r+t~tior, R1~'~s~ fit 9r to contact ~, ~ir~t~t~r, t ~ r s.t ~ P~ric ~~ ~l~p~r GC_- ~r.nald Paxtcn aav3n N9ax~a~etl ~s~tarl ~ L~tti~r, f''E ~,~r~~: 1. artist ~~rsdarir~gs '~. ~e€~ta1 r~grmarit fo~r'~its i~r: ~rtr~s~nt~ 3. ~is~r Traffic and; paslsirl~ studa~ ~~ S~d~c ~Jcareda codes. Dusan Peric From: Bill Royce [broyce@co.okeechobee.fl.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 5:00 PM To: 'Dusan Peric' Subject: RE: Laurel Oaks Senior Apartments: Parking Space Requirements Categories: 06 LOSA Based on the information you provided, with the stipulation that housing is limited to those 62 or over and perhaps limiting each unit to one vehicle, the parking ratio of 1.1 spaces per unit is acceptable. -----Original Message----- From: Dusan Peric [mailto:DPeric@beneficialcom.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 2:30 PM To: broyce@co.okeechobee.fl.us Cc: Don Paxton; John Luther; okeechobeelawyer@yahoo.com Subject: Laurel Oaks Senior Apartments: Parking Space Requirements Bill, As per our phone conversation this morning, attached please find a request for a reduction of parking spaces for the above referenced project. Regards, Dusan Peric Beneficial Communities (941) 929 1270 x 104 Addendum to Lease Agreement Lease agreement between Dated this 2005 Property This addendum to the lease agreement will require that one parking space will be issued per unit. Resident will comply to this addendum dated March 28, 2005 modifies the original agreement. Resident Signature Bate Senior Lease Parking Addendum Resident and day of Printed Name SENIOR HOUSING TRIP GENERATION AND PARKING DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS by Stephen B. Corcoran, P.E. (M)a presented at the Institute of Transportation Engineers 66th Annual Meeting INTRODUCTION As the baby boomer generation ages, special housing projects have been developed for them in lieu of the traditional single-family home or apartment. Congregate care facilities, independent living apartments, assisted-care units, and senior apartments are being marketed, developed, and built to handle the needs of older adults. The changing lifestyle of older adults affects their transportation needs and usage as well. Trip generation and parking demand within this age group vary significantly from traditional residential uses because residents no longer have to be at work, pick up their children, or do their shopping at specific times. Also many senior communities provide on-site services to meet their residents' needs. This paper will present the author's experiences with senior housing and its trip and parking characteristics along with data on projects in suburban Chicago; Illinois and around the United States. SENIOR HOUSING TYPES Older adults have many special needs that change over time. Many seniors are clearly independent and need LLttle assistance other than. help with major chores w repairs. They are generally active and healthy. As time goes by, however, their needs change and grab bars become important, as well as, other features such as higher electrical outlets, emergency response systems,'and lower reach cabinets. Good nutrition, socialization, and access to medical and supportive care also becomes more important. Several distinct types of housing have been developed to accommodate these needs: Senior Single ramify domes are senior-on(y subdivisions which have been developed for retirees ages 55 and up in the southeast and southwest sections of the United States. These developments typically 1nCIUd2 reCieatlOnal facilities. Many of the residents are refired. Senior Apartments are traditional apartment complexes with a minimum age requirement of 55 years old. Some amenities include recreational facilities, security, and special design features. Residents are independent and may still be working. Independent Living Units are cottages or apartments were older adults five independently but without the worries of maintenance or housekeeping. Medical care can be available at the facility or by visiting medical staff. A variety of amenities are provided for the residents depending on the size of the community. a Senior Transportation Consultant, Metro Transportation Group, Inc, Hanover Park, Illinois Senior Housing Trip Generation and Parking Characteristics Institute of Transportation Engineers 66th Annual Meeting Page 1 Assisted-Care Units are for older adults having difficulty managing in an independent living arrangement but who do not need nursing home care. Assisted-care is usually apartment living with additional staff to help with normal daily activities. Congregate Care Facilities contain a full spectrurta of housing types in one development with town homes or cottages, independent living units, assisted-care units, and nursing care. Congregate Care Facilities (CCF) al{ow the elderly to age in one place with nursing care available if they need it. This is particularly important for elderly couples wishing to stay together with one spouse needing special care. CCFs are in essence self-contained communities. Table 1 lists the amenities that are typically available at a CCF. Table 1 Typical Congregate Care Facility On-Site Services and Facilities Standard Services Extra Services Common Facilities • Main Meal of the Day • 24-Hour Nursing • Daily Check-In • Weekly Laundry • Utilities • Housecleaning . • Organized Programs • In Room Food Service • Bus Stiuttle • 24-Hour Security • Complete Maintenance • Free Parking • Garbage Col{ection • Notary Public Service • • Supportive Care Nurse • . Chaplain • Breakfast and Lunch • Extended Room Service • Specialized Diets • Guest Meals • Catering • Physician = Podiatrist • Physical/Speech Therapy • Insurance • Chauffeur Service • Garages • Telephone • Cable N • Photocopying • Lounge Area • Dining Room • Library • Chapel • Recreation Room • Country Store = Pharmacy • Arts and Crafts Room • Workshop • Cafe • Exercise Room • Beauty/Barber Shop • Bank Branch Office • Solarium • Whirlpool • Outside Patio • Garden Plots Source: Milwaukee, Wisconsin CCF Brochure LITERATURE REVIEW A review was made of available data on senior trip generation and parking demands. Information was obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip and Parking Generation Manuals, the author's files, data from other consultants, as well as, information from California, Arizona, and Florida Departments of Transportation. After reviewing the data, it became clear that the amount of data is small and that the definition of senior housing was not consistent among each source. The data did not distinguish between the five categories mentioned previously. Senior Housing Trip Generation and Parking Characteristics Institute of Transportation Engineers 66th Annual Meeting Page 2 FACTORS AFFECTING TRIP GENERATION ANb PARKING Several factors affect the trip generation and parking demand at any particular facility. These include the number of dwelling units, nursing beds, average age of residents, resident's affluence, number of employees, and available bus shuttle/chauffeur service. More data needs to be collected in order to properly analyze their relationship to trip generation and parking demand. The trip generation rates for individual facilities varied. Insufficient information on all the survey locations made it difficult to statistically draw conclusions on individual impact of those factors. However, experience has indicated that as the average age of residents increases, the number of trips and parking demand decreases. This is an obvious affect of the aging process. Nursing beds require more staff to service a patient needs than a more independent resident. When the proportion of nursing beds to residential units increases, the amount of traffic and parking generally increase. The economic well being of residents increases the likelihood that they own a car and thus drive and park. Lastly, bus shuttle/chauffeur service will provide an option to the auto for residents keeping traffic and parking rates lower. DAILY TRAFFIC GENERATION Information on daily trip ends was obtained from surveys by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Florida and Arizona Departments of Transportation. This data generally categorized the facilities as retirement communities but included CCFs, senior apartment complexes, and may have nursing beds. The author's data consisted of one CCF in Pennsylvania. Table 2 summarizes the trip data and rates. The average trip rate daily varied between 2.78 and 8.91 trips per unit. The variation in rates supports the conclusion that the number of units/beds is not the only variable inf;uencing trip production. The weighted average trip ends were 4.52 trips per unit which included one large development of 3,122 units. Without the 3,122 unit project, the weighted average rate was 5.64 trips per units. The weighted daily trip generation rate, was 5.64 trip ends a day for senior housing developments. Senior housing generates two-thirds the amount of traffic .compared to a typical single-family development. It's closer to other multi-family categories, including apartments (6.47 trips/unit) and condominiums or townhouses (5.86 trips/units). Table 3 shows the weekly variation in volumes based on one facility. The weekdayvolumes were consistent. Weekend traffic volumes were slightly tower. Table 4 illustrates the. hourly distrbution of traffic throughout an average weekday, Saturday, and Sunday. The peak-hour volumes of the facility occurred at lunch time and mid-afternoon (2:00 to 4:OD PM). CaltranG data indicated that the peak-hour occurred bet:~,~een 11:00 AM and 4:00 PM, depending on the facility. These peak-hour times do not coincide with the peak-hour of adjacent street traffic. because the residents do not have or want to travel during the rush hour. Also, the employee shifts are generally off peak. Most facilities are staffed 24 hours a day with a 7:00 AM-3:00 PM, 3:00 PM -11:00 PM; 91:00 PM- 7:00 AM shift schedule. Some administrative staff follow a typical 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM shift. PEAK-HOUR TRIP GENERATION RATES Table 5 shows the trip generation rates for eight facilities during the morning and evening .peak-hour of the adjacent street system. The weighted average trip rate was 0.222 trips per unit/bed in the morning peak and 0.247 trips per unit/bed in the evening peak. Trip rates ranged from 0.085 to 0.450 per unit. The directional splits were 65% inbound and 35% outbound in the morning and 40% inbound and 60% outbound in the evening. Compared to other residential land-uses, senior developments generate significantly less traffic on a per unit basis. Senior Housing Trip Generation and Parking Characteristics Institute of Transportation Engineers 66th Annual Meeting Page 3 Table 2 Table 3 Daily Trip Generation Rates for Senior Housing Weekly Volume Distribution Number of Daily Trip Source Dwelling Units Trips Rates Caltrans 3122 9630 3.09 300 830. 2.78 108 310 2.87 76 260 3.42 460 2252 4.90 Florida 366 3262 8.91 DOT 560 1985 3.55 187 1449 7.75 120 901 7.51 127 561 4.42 Arizona 125 972 7.78 DOT 176 855 4.86 74 447 6.04 60 285 4.75 216 ~ 1386 6.42 175 1058 6.05 129 941 7.30 112 922 8.23 106 820 7.74 89 538 6.05 81 529 6.53 60 494 8.23 59 432 7.30 Penn. CCF 247 1163 4.71 Weighted Average 7135 32282 4.52 Without 4013 22652 5.64 3.122 units ITE Average Weekday Daily Rates Single-Family (Code 210) 9.55 Apartment (Code 220) 6.47 Condo/townhouse (Code 230) 5.86 Congregate Care Facility (Code 251) 2.15 Day of the Week Percentage Monday 15% Tuesday 15% Wednesday 16% Thursday 17% Friday 15% Saturday 12% Sunday 10% Total 100% Table 4 Hourly Traffic Distribution StarE Average Hour Weekday Saturday Sunday 12:00 AM 1.46% 1.45% 2.76% :00 AfVI 0.07% 0.12% 0.26% 2:00 AM 0% 0.00% 0.26% 3:00 AM 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 4:00 AM 0.46% 0.00% 0.66% 5:00 AM 0.41 % 0.60% 0.39% 6:00 AM 1.94% 2.05% 1.71 7:00 AM 5.74% 5.06% 3.94% 8:00 AM 6.70% 5.06% 4.99% 9:00 AM 6.19% 5.78% 6.17% 10:00 AM 7.20% 9.40% 7.74% 11:00 AM 9.33% 9.p4% 8.53% 12:00 PM 7.05% 8.07% 8.01 1:OQ PM 7.44% 6.27°,~0 4.86°,~0 2:00 PM 9.76% 7.59% 8.40% 3:OD PM 9.54% 10.24% .9.84% 4:00 PM 8.39% 9.40% 9.32% 5:00 PM 5.26% 6.14% 6.96% 6:00 PM 3.14% 3.25% 3.54% 7:00 PM 2.90% 2.89% 4.20% 8:00 PM 2.59% 2.05% 2.49% 9:00 PM 1.10% 1.57% 1.31 10:00 PM 1.24% 1.33% 1.05% 11:00 PM 1.96% 2.65% 2.62% Senior Housing Trip Generation and Parking Characteristics Institute of Transportation Engineers 66th Annual Meeting Page 4 Table 5 Peak-Hour Trip Generation Rates Occupied Units Dwelling Nursing AM Peak PM Peak Facility Location Units Beds Total Volume Rate Volume Covenant Village Northbrook, IL 220 151 371 86 .231 133 Friendship Village Lombard, IL 620 100 720 86 -.120 180 Presbyterian Home Evanston, f L 312 166 478 92 .193 139 Glenview Terrace Glenview, IL 243 243 21 Good Shephard Manor Barrington, IL 102 102 18 .180 17 Mayslake ©akbrook, IL 630 630 67 .106 75 Leisure Village New Jersey 200 200 65 .325 62 Pennsylvania CCF 210 37 247 78 .316 111 Totals 2537 454 2991 492 738 Weighted Average Trip Rate .164 .247 Inbound Percentage 65% 40% Outbound Percentage 35% 60% Comparison to other ITE Residential Rates Single Family Homes (Land Use Code 26) Apartments (Land Use Code 220) Condominiums/Townhouses (Land Use Code 230) 0.74 1.01 0.51 0.63 0.44 0.55 Senior Housing Trip Generation and Parking Characteristics Institute of Transportation Engineers 66th Annual Meeting Page 5 PARKING DEMAND SURVEYS Parking demand characteristics were obtained from a number of surveys conducted in the Chicago metropolitan area The peak parking demand occurred during the mid-day between 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM corresponding, in part,.with the largest employee shift on-site. Table 6 summarizes those surveys. The peak day of the year is Mother's Day when many facilities run out of visitor parking, according to the on-site staff. The peak parking demand rates varied between 0.214 and 0.579 vehicles per unit/bed with a weighted average rate of 0.404 vehicles per unit/bed. Erriployee, resident, and visitor parking is included. This rate is one third to one half the parking rate of other residential uses. Readers should note that the survey sites with the higher parking rates generally have more nursing beds which requires more employees than the residential units. Table 6 Peak Parking Demand Surveys Dwelling Nursing Development Location Units Beds Total Units/Beds Peak Parking Rate Peak Parking Demand Covenant V11age Northbrook, IL 220 151 371 0.490 182 Beacon Hill Bombard. IL 235 23 258 0.565 146 Friendship Vliage Schaumburg, IL 620 100 720 0.390 281 Presbyterian Home Evanston, IL 312 166 478 0.579 277 Glenview Terrace Glenview, IL 243 243 0.214 52 Mayslake Oakbrook, IL 630 630 0.408 257 EJM Engineering Studies Lilac Lodge Waukegan, IL 203 203 0.315 64 Deerfield Place Deerfield. IL 98 98 0.230 2'~ ITE Parking Manual, 2nd Ed Retirement Community (Land I ICe Code 250) 500 500 0.270 135 3061 440 3501 1417 We ighted Average 0.404 ITE Parking Manual, 2nd Edition Low/Mid-Rise Apartments (Land Use Code 221) 1.21 High-Rise Apartments (Land Use Code 222) ' 0.88 Residential Condominium (Land Use Code 230) 1.11 Senior Housing Trip Generation and Parking .Characteristics institute of Transportation Engineers 66th Annual Meeting Page 6 Conclusions Based on the analyses and studies for this paper, the following findings were made: 1. The overall category of senior housing should. be broken down into at least five categories for trip generation and parking demand purposes. These categories could be: • Senior Single-Family Housing • Senior Apartments • Independent Living Units • Assisted-Care Units • Congregate Care Facility 2. Several factors affect the trip generation and parking demand at any particular facility. Any new survey should include the number of dwelling units, nursing beds, average age of residents, resident's affluence, number of employees, and available bus shuttle/chauffeur service. More data needs to be collected in order to properly analyze their relationship to trip generation and parking demand. 3. Daily trip generation rates were found to be 4.52 to 5.64 trip ends a day for senior housing developments. Senior housing generates two-thirds the amount of traffic compared to a typical single- family development. It's daily rates are similar to other multi-family categories, including apartments (6.47 trips/unit} and condominiums/townhouses (5.86 trips/units). 4. Trip generation rates during the peak hour of adjacent street traffic are significantly less because most employees arrive/depart during off-peak periods and residents avoid the peak-hour congestion. The peak hour rates are one-half to one-fourth that of other residential.land-uses. The peak-hours of site traffic occurs in the late-morning. or early afternoon. 6. The peak parking demand at most senior facilities occurred midday with an average peak demand of 0.40 vehicles per dwelling unit for residents, employees, and visitors. Mother's Day is the highest parking day of the year with many facilities short of spaces for that one day. References 1. Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition; institute of I ransportation Engineers; January, 1991 2. Parking Generation Manual, 2nd Edition; institute of Transportation Engineers; August, 1987 3. Parking Reauirements for Retirement Centers Requirements and Demands; EJM Engineering; t~1ay, 1987 4. 6th Progress Report of Trip Ends Generation Research Counts; California Department of Transportation; 1965-1970 5. Florida Department of Transportation Trip Generation Data 6. Arizona Department of Transportation Trip Generation Data Senior Housing Trip Generation and Parking Characteristics Institute of Transportation Engineers 66th Annual Meeting Page 7 CN.T BY: FORUM; 1234657; MAR-25-05 6:OOPM; PAGE 2/3 'A.RT6. OkF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REGULATIONS* (~fi~lV1 ~ 1~~ 3'a~c I of t V1J~ Sec. 656.604. Number of off-street parking spaces required. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided and maintained in all districts, other than as specifically provided for in the CCBD District, as follows: (a) Residential crses: (1) Single-family dwelling--Two spaces. (2} Multiple-family dwellings--One and one-half spaces for an efficiency, studio or one bedroom dwelling not exceeding 500 square feet, one and three-quarters spaces for one bedroom dwelling containing 500 square feet or more, two spaces for two bedroom dwellings and an additional one-quarter space for each bedroom in excess of two, plus one space for owner or operator and one space for each two employees: In determining the number of bedrooms, rooms depicted as dens, studios and similarly depicted areas shall be construed to be an additional bedroom for the purposes. of determining the number of off-street parking spaces required. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section, two off-street parking spaces shall be required far each townhouse ar rawhouse permitted pursuant to Section 656.415_ (3} Rooming and boarding houses--One space for each two bedrooms. (4) IVlobile home park--Two spaces for each mobile harne, plus one space far each 200 square feet of nonstorage floor area for manager's office, laundry facilities, recreation building, etc. (5} Mobile home on individual lot--Two spaces. (6) Housing for the elderly--One space for each two dwelling units. (7) Nurses' homes, convents and monasteries-One space far each four lodging l.lrllts. (8) Fraternity and sorority houses--One space for each two residents. (9) Hotels and motels-One space for each sleeping room plus the spaces required for accessory uses such as restaurants and meeting rooms. (10) CCBD District--No off-street parking space is required when a dwelling unit is created within an existing nonresidential structure. One off-street parking space is required for each dwelling unit for new construction. ltp:i/library l .municade.cam/gateway.dll/fl/1lorida/2976fi/30379/303 85?f=temptates$fn=document-fro... 3/2/2005 ~FNT BY: FoftUM; 1234657; MAR-25-05 6:01 PM; PAGE 3/3 . 1-,c~i~l~,1,r., v. vrr-~1 tc~>;~t YAKK.tirlCi AND LOAD.[NG* ~~,~~~ Page 1 of 2 I Sec. 94-262. Required number of parking spaces. ~ , (a) For al( districts except C-3, off-street parking requirements are as follows: (1) Single-family and two-family dwelling structures: Two spaces for each dwelling unit. (2} Multiple-family dwelling structures: Two spaces for each dwelling unit. (3) Churches, temples or places of warship: One space for each four seats in the main auditorium. (4} Commercial manufacturing and industrial concerns not catering to the retail trade: One space for each 1,000 square feet .of floor area, plus one space for each company vehicle operating from the premises. (5) Country, golf or gun clubs: One space for each five members. (6) General business, commercial or personal service establishments: One space for each 200 square feet of non-storage floor area. (7) Hotels: 1.1 spaces for each bedroom. (8) Hospitals, sanitariums, convalescent and nursing homes: One space for each patient (9) Housing for the aged: One space for each dwelling unit. (See the definition in section 94-2. ) (10) Kennels and anima! hospitals: One space for each 400 square feet of non-storage floor area. (11) Libraries and museums: One space for each 200 square feet of non-storage floor area, or one space for each three seats, whichever is greater. (12) ^~ledical or der•~tai offices or clinics: One space for each doctor or dentist, plus three spaces for each consultation or examining room. (13) Mortuaries: One space for each 50 square feet of floor area used for services: (14) Motels: 1,1 spaces for each bedroom. (15) Office and public buildings: Seven spaces for each 1,000 square feet of floor area used for office purposes. (16) Private clubs and ledges: One space for each give members: (17) Restaurants, other eating places and cocktail lounges: One space for each three seats. (18) Roominghouses, boardinghouses and dormitories: One space for each liv(ng unit. (19) Schools: One space for each two employees, plus one space for each three students of driving age. (20) Theater's, auditoriums and places of assembly; One space for each four seats. (21) Bowling alleys: Five spaces for each bowling lane. (22) Student housing: One space for every two sleeping accommodations. (23) All other uses: Parking requirements for uses not listed (n this section shall be determined by the planning board. (b) For uses in the C-3 district, off-street park(ng requirements are as follows: (1) Residential dwellings: One space per dwelling unit. (2) All other uses: One space for each '1,000 square feet of gross floor area. (Code 1981, app. C, § 26-9(2}) :tp://library.municode.com/gateway.dlUfUfloridal4103/4254/4259?f-templates$ii~=document-frame.h_._ 3/25!2005 - `ARTICLE VIII. OFF-STREET PARKING, LOADING, AND OTHER VEHICULAR US... Page 7 of 18 ~ recorded in the office of the city engineer according to the office of the city engineer. (Code 1972, § 20-498; Ord. No. 93-146, ~ 1, 9-21-93) Sec. 250815. Plans required for.parking facilities. A plan shall be submitted with every application for a building permit for any use or structure required to provide off-street parking under this chapter, and prior to the construction of any parking facility, whether or not said facility is required by this chapter. Said plan shall clearly and accurately designate the required parking space, access aisles and driveways, and relation to the uses or structures these off-street parking facilities are intended to serve. (Code 1972, § 20-499) Sec. 250816. Amount of off-street parking. The minimum number of parking spaces to be provided and maintained for each use or occupancy shall be as follows: (1) Residential uses: (a) Dwelling, one-family and two-family: Two (2) parking spaces shall be required for each dwelling unit for which primary access is by a street fifty (50) feet in width or greater. Dwellings shall provide a garage or carport for one (1 j such space. Such carport shall effectively screen an automobile from view on three (3} sides utilizing a wall, fence, or hedge at least four (4) feet in height. However, for.each individual dwelling which contains four (4) bedrooms for which primary access is by a street less than fifty (50) feet in width, a fully enclosed garage designed for storage of at least two (2) automobiles shall be required. In addition to the above stated requirement, each individual dwelling which contains five (5) or more bedrooms for which access is by a street less than fifty (50) feet in width, shall provide one (1) additional parking space within three hundred (300) feet of the affected dwelling. (b) Dwe!!!ng, multiple-family: 1. Efficiency 'and one (1) bedroom units: One and one-half (1 1/2) parking spaces for each unit. 2. One (1) bedroom units with den, two (2) bedroom units and three (3) bedroom units: (a) Two (2) parking spaces for each unit in buildings thirty-five (35) feet or less in height. (b) One and three-quarters (1 3/4) parking spaces for each unit in buildings over thirty-fve (35) feet in height. 3. Three (3) bedroom units with den and four (4) or more bedroom units: (a) Two and one-quarter (2 114) parking spaces for each unit in buildings thirty-fve (35) feet or less in height. (b) Two (2) parking spaces for each unit in buildings over thirty-five (35) feet in height. 4. Refer to section 250147 for parking requirements for http: //library2.municode. com/gateway. dlllfl/florida/33043/33071/33079?f=templates$fn=d... 3 /31 /2005 • ARTICLE VIII. OFF-STREET PARKING, LOADING, AND OTHER VEHICULAR US... Page 8 of 18 townhouse subdivisions. 5. In addition to the above, multiple-family buildings shall be required to provide supplemental guest parking space equal to a minimum of ten (10) percent of the spaces required per building. Such supplemental parking sha-I be installed pursuant to this chapter. (c) Dormitories, fraternities: One (1) parking space for each bed. (d) Hotels and motels, including clubs: One (1) parking space for each seeping room. If, in addition to sleeping rooms, there are other uses operated in conjunction with and/or as part of the hotel/motel, additional off-street parking spaces shall be provided for such other uses as would be required by this section if such uses were separate from the hotel/motel to the extent of thirty-five (35) percent of the off-street parking . specified in this article for retail stores, offices, services, establishments, bars, restaurants, dining roms, night clubs, cabarets, ballrooms, banquet halls meeting rooms, auditoriums. (e) Housing for elderly: O.ne (1) parking space for F2esidential care facility, Category 2 and 3: one and twenty-six hundredth's (1.26) parking spaces for each sleeping room. (2) Gommercia! uses: One (1) parking space is required per square footage indicated in each category: 60 square feet: Bars Beer gardens Cafeterias Cocktail lounges Night clubs Taverns 100 square feet: TelemarketerS 125 square feet: ' Convenience stores 150 square feet: Bakery Butcher shop Delicatessens Dry cleaning Grocery Ice cream Laundry Liquor store http://librarv2.municode.com/~atewav. dlllfl/florida/33043/33 071 /33079?f=templates$fn=d... 3 /31/2005 IN THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMElV'T OF THE CITI' OF PENSACOLA ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Case # 07-02-06 This matter came before this Board upon the application of Robert A. Colvazd for a variance to the requirements of Sectionl2-3-1(Bl of the City of Pensacola Land bevelopment Code, to wit: a variance of 150 parking spaces to the required I84 off-street parlcin~ spaces to allow 34 off=street parking spaces for the Englewood Senior Apartments at 1810 West Cervantes Street Based upon the consideration of the application and other evidence presented at a hearing before the Board, the Board: Finds that the application is for an impermissible variance as to the use of the subject property, and, therefore; the Board denies the variance. Fnids that the evidence does not support the fmdings and determinations which the Boazd is required by law to make in order to authorize the variance; and, therefore the Board denies the variance. Makes the following findings and determinations: 1. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district; 2. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; 3. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district; 4. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the applicable zoning ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enj oyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance and. would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant 5. That the variance granted is the m;n;mum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; 6. That the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the applicable zoning ordinance and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public t~,-elfare; and Cit)~ of Pensacola Zoning Boazd of Adjustment February 15, ?006 Case ~ 07-02-06 That the variance will not constitute any change in the districts shown on the zoning map, will not impair an adequate suppl;r of light and air to adjacent property, will not materially increase the congestion in public streets, or increase the public danger of fire and safety, w711 not materially diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding area, and will not other wise nnpair the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Pensacola. and, therefore; grants the variance subject to the following conditions and safeguards: DONE AND ORDERED this the 15th day of Febtvat-~~, ?006 by the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Cit3~ of Pensacola. Attest: By; .L~-+---'~-r ~..J Secretary Chairman J < <q-~-r i ~.t cr ~ VARIANCE GRANTED BY THE BOARD OF ADJiJSTMEI~'T: The petitioner must secure a building pet~rnit and commence work urithiu one hundred eighty (180) days of the date of the granting of the variance; unless additional time is granted by the Board at that particular meeting. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DECISION OF BOARD OF ADJIISTNIENT: Tf denied a variance by the Board, that request for a variance cannot be heard again for a period of one (1) year. In accordance with Section 1?-12-2 of the Land Development Code, any person or persons, jointly or severally, aggrieved by a decision of the Board, may apply to the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Court of Florida within thirty (30) days from the date of rendition of the decision by the Board. The Board, Building Inspector, or Artomey of the City of Pensacola must be notified of an appeal within five (5) days of the application being made to the Circuit Court. If aNotice or Appeal has nct been received vrithin tlii~,-five (3 d) days of the daze of rendition of the decision of the Board and the variance w-as denied, the petitioner shall be notified. by the Building Inspector that they have ten (10} days to remove or correct the violation. SPAM-LOW Parking for Royal Palm Senior Apartments.txt From: Cunningham,.Keith [keith.cunningham@Titusville.com] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 9:03 AM To: 'JLUTHER@beneficialcom.com' Cc: ]ohnston, Stan Subject: SPAM-LOW: Parking for Royal Palm Senior Apartments john, After our meeting earlier this week we reviewed your 4/1/05 letter and the information you submitted as back up. Pursuant to the City of Titusville's LDR section 39-61(21) we have determined that the 1 parking space per senior unit lus and 10% for staff and visitors is adequate. Please let me know if you need anything else. Keith Cunningham No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by Avg Anti-virus. version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.5 - Release Date: 4/7/2005 Page 1 STORMWATER NARRATIVE Pine Berry Senior Apartments The subject property consists of 3.22 acres and is, in existing condition, a sports bar and bowling alley with a parking lot. Stormwater design will be in compliance with the guidelines set forth from the City of Clearwater and The SWFWMD. Stormwater runoff for the site will be captured, treated and released at the pre-development rate by an outfall control structure. The subject site stormwater quality and rate of runoff will be improved over the site drainage conditions as currently exist. Please see the Drainage Calculations and Construction Documents for fiirther demonstration of guideline compliance. ¢,~ SGM ENGINEERING, INC. s MEP CONSULTING ENGINEERS 935 Lake Baldwin Lane Orlando, FL 32814 ,~ E Tel: 407-767-5188 Fax: 407-767-5772 b, , www.SQmenQlneerlnp.COm August 31, 2009 Clearwater Fire & Rescue 610 Franklin Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Fire Flow & Hydrant Worksheet -Pine Berry Apartments This report has been prepared as requested by the Authority Having Jurisdiction for the City of Clearwater, Florida. The information contained in following report was assembled based on flow test information provided by the City of Clearwater Water Department. The location of the fire flow test hydrant was also provided by the City of Clearwater Water Department. Distance of the test gauges relative to the base of the building riser is approximate. Please contact our office with any questions or concerns. Sinceg=ely, SGM EN NEERING, INC. Jo . Lizasoain, P.E., CxA Mechanical Department Manager Clearwater Fine & Rescue " 610 Franklin Street -Clearwater, Florida 33756 ~~~~ Public Works Administration -Engineering Department -'" 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 -Clearwater, Florida 33756 fIRE FLOW 8~ HYDRANT,INORKSHEET (Revised 03/29/2006) This worksheet is required to be submitted to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to DRC meeting for any project that is more than 3 stories or more than 30 feet in height above the lowest Fire Dept vehicle access point or for any other project that will require an Aufiomatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Flre Pump before any permits for new building construction, building e~ansion or fire hydrants will be issued by the City of Clearwater. Information and design must comply with Florida Building Code, Chapter 9 -Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire Prevention Code to indude applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13, 13D, 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20, 291 and 1142 Annex H) and AWWA M-17 -Installation, Field Testing and Maintenance of Flre Hydrants. PROJECTiNFORMATION Project Name: Pine Berry Apartments ProjectAddress:1225 South Highland Ave. GENERAL WATER SYSTElIN'INFORMATION Location of Nearest Fire Hydrant Corner of S . Highland and Barry Hydrant#: 04 Size ofWaterMain Supplying Flre Flow: 6" Looped System or Dead End WaterMain? Looped Static: 79 psi Residual: 70 psi Pitot: 53 psi FIow:1220 gpm Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the F3ser: Horizontal 1260 Ft. Vertical Elevation 3 Ft. HydrantTest Conducted by: City of Clearwater Water Department (see attached) (Include/Attach Copy of Actual Test Sheet) NFPA HAZARD CLASSIFICATION Area # Classification Description of Hazard P-otected (ComrrpdityDescription, 5torageHeight and Arrangement, if applicable): Living Units Light Hazard Residential Commodities Mech. Rooms Ord. Haz. Gr.l General Mech. equipment storage Elec. Rooms Ord. Haz. Gr.l General Electrical ecuipment Telecom Rooms Ord. Haz. Gr.l General Telecom ecuipment Tenent Storage Ord. Haz. Gr.l Residential storage AttachAdditional Sheets ifNecessary Page 1 of 3 DESIGN PARAMETERS.. Area # System Type Light Haz. Wet Area (sq. ft.) 1500 sq ft Density (gpm'ft) Inside Hose (gpm) .10 gpm/ft~2 50 GPM Outside Hose (gpm) 50 GPM Ord. Haz. Wet 1500 sq ft .15 gpm/ft~2 100 GPM 150 GPM Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary Total Needed Fre Flow (N.F.F.) 1000 GPM max. Is Exi sting System Supply Suffident to Meet N.F.F. Above? No X Yes CODES AND STANDARDS System Component Applicable NFPA Standard /Year Edition and OtherApplicable Codes or Statutes Sprinkler System NFPA 13 and 13R / 2002 edition Fire Pump NFPA 20 / 2002 edition Standpipe System NFPA 14 / 2002 edition Underground Piping NFPA 24 / 2002 edition Attach Additional Sheets ifNecessary If Project Indudes Fire Pump, Supplythe Following: Fire Pump Information: Pump Capadty: 1000 gpm Chum Pressure: 164 psi Rated Pressure: 75 psi Pressure @ 150% Flow: 62 psi On-Site Storage Tank Capacity (?): N/A r ~Q~pe RFR I SPr-c~(FtER INFORMATION ~ Preparer Name: Jose R. Lizasoain, P . E . Company Name: SGM Engineering, Inc . Mailing Address: 935 Lk. Baldwin Lane City: Orlando State: Florida Zip: 32814 Phone:407-767-5188 Fax: 407-767-5772 y ,/ 3/ ~s Jose R. Lizasoain, P.E. Florida P.E. 60785 .E. Seal Page 2 of 3 .ADDITIONAL INFORINATION REQUCRED Fire Prevention Items to be Addressed Prior to DRC Approval: 1. Provide Fire Flow Ca~ulations /Water Study lry a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply 's available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/orf ire pump. If a fire pump is required, the water supply must be able to suppy 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, NFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA291, and NFPA 1142 (Annex H)s required. 2. When an FDC is required, ~ shall be a mininum of 15 feetfrom building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40 feet. This hydrant shall not be located on the same main as the Fire Sprinkler and must be on the supply side of a double detector check valve. This by dram is in addition to the hydrant that 's required forfirefighting purposes that is to be within 300 feet of building, as the hose lays, and on the same side of the street as the project. 3. Provide and show on the plan a minimum 30-#oot turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at all entrances and exits. 4. Prov ide and show on the she plan 24 fed of width at driveway s /drive aisles for emergency v ehicle ingress and egress for front and rear parking lots. Where driveway s are split ~ an island with one-way traffic, each side of the 'eland shall provide and show on the site plan 20f eet of width at the driv eways on each side of the island. 5. Prov ide a Fire Department access roadway (with turn-around, Y, T or cul-de~ac) in accordance with NFPA 1. A Fire Department access roadway must have 244oot clear width and 14fioot vertical clearance, and be capable of supporting the weight of Fire Department vehicles (80,000Ibs). Page 3 of 3 08/31/2009 09:06 7275624961 PUBLIC UTILITIES ~~ ~.~~al v~ ~~t,~ FAX M~~~/~,G~ CITY OF Gt~EARWATER l PUBLIC UTILITtE 166Q-C ARCTURAB AVE. N. CI,EARWATER, FL. 3376b PHONE (727} 582-~L980 FAX (727) a62~1963 T0; ~` U ~~" ~dA, ~ U ~f ~ LOCATION: [ ~ ,~2.~ f ~ ~'Z' ~ ~ "~ - FAX NUMBER: 7~:~1 ~- ~2~(-~,a9 ~ FROM: ~. yo lG ~' DATE: ~~ QI REMARKS;. f- ~©~J' ~~~ TIME: I NUMgt=R C}!` PAGES (INCLUAING Th(!S COVER PAGE') PAGE 01 ~aq~c~ ~'4! 4r~ ,~1. Lvt 08/31/2009 0'3:06 7275524951 PUBLIC UTILITIES PAGE 04 FLC~l~!' T'E~T CI'T'Y OF CLEI4RWATER WATER DEPARTMENT L.OGATtON l ~ ~~ S r ~l' ~ ~ ~ /`l l V ~ ,/~ V~ r DATE OF ~'lrST ~ ~ ? ~ STATIC- PSI ~~ -~ ~ ~~ RESIDUAL ~ PSI ~ V ~ rf Q PITOT PSI .,~ ~ ~ ~' ~~ l ~ ~ ~~7 ~ V r FLOW ~~ ~'V GPM ~ U ~ r ~ , ~ PM .~D7 - /~ ~l ~ WYDRANT ~ `f CxRID # MISC: ~{~~.~'~ jCl~~ ~ _. CUSTOMER REQUESTING TEST J P(n~berry Senlar ~Ol~h EleVatiOn ~- /;b ~' w'~ I f ~. t Gam, FL or-alai "RpIUtW~E9Kt"IF"7RRS~k.le~mmn.dartmrbn~.vw~MdrmnNCrd.~m.aro.ynr.ioeapr~.oaeapd~+m mn.a-w~M•wrbcsrr~aams~umdma~emmnYrui~.q~.nmm~rdrwe~m,mn~~r~mtrgn,hPdmprr. ~ / ~^ r, ~y..,~ ~~ 'J~ SCALE:1 "=20' FORUM® GRAPHIC SCALE '0 0 10 20 40 (IN FEET) 1"=20' Date: 10h 5/Q9 - _ i:r~ \ ARCHfTECTURE 8 INTERIOR QESI~N, INC. I~I~i~ 76SgWYmw~,W0eH21 aYmnierpbp~,A371~ am..+msaaaao la /OT.A20M13 wwkiprertHedurtmn ~- _ ell l"s '_ C _ -. _ ~ 3~ __ _ __ >=• a.•...q °'.° m - . I atiN BARRY STREET I _ -- - -.~ ~ _ _ --~. . . ~ Q a ~ no r ff . .. a ~ u r e^+ _ -_ _- --r l -Y+~ m _~_ Ns a ~ ... -_ t .. ~ ` ~ _ 1 , .L e. 7 f J = e I o _ ... - G ~ ~ I 1 . - __ P T~ ~ -I ' _ ~ aI __ e• ~~ - ~ ~~ ~ _ y a u - z ,~ . > a ~ ?~ sae ~ ~ I I I ~ I! I ~ D" 'P ~ I la ~" - ~~ N STORY BLDG ~. _ . ` g0 ~ ~~.. ~ ~ - ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . >s,o - j~3 ~ ~ ~ Lv ~ - ~-sw ~-~ P u ~p N e F DH ! _ I irl-' = J I I'm NP 1 1 IOW. { -_ T e!o~eio~e o ~oe' ~ ~~o~ ~ ~ ~ o l~i : I J M `.I e e e el . _ °- ., , -j--~ '. r.- i - --- - - - l ~'~ t I ~ ~ ~ - - .. . a.e.•.auw,.~ my - I 1 - ' l y r ~ 7 ~, . 1, 3 s _ ~ '. 1, ~ _ - I • ~, 1~ ~ it = ~ TUSCOLA 1 .._ , ~~ ~' Ii ' ~, ~ III ~ I ROAD . L I ~ I' PLANT SCHEDULE y ~ 4 '-- . y I~¢5 ~ 99Idf11C~ 'Eon Pdurho' ~o Hoy Cord ~co SIOZF 12 Na, 5'-6 sp rgioEU~~ L -+!- I~ f -- ~.~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' - tN 16 Lageralmemiq indim NAcha Nelchei Crope NYAIe - 2 Cel 8 -1D HL, 3 -4 Sp. DnuyM TokrvM i. MD 2 uavmru Rpnd+non 'D.D. aamh•ra' iY SDUNern Yognotio - 2.6"Cal 10'-1z' HL, 5'-6' Sp. Native, Drought TolenM m..ws hi 2 gmlb grvntllllvn '11t0• Gsm' OwM 3euNam N q v e - 1.9"Col 10'-12' M., 9'-6' Sp. Ngtlve, Oreught Tal•mn! ~10' - ~, i 7 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' OH 14 Ouenu v:ginane TTY HgMiae live Oa4 - Col t0 -12 -0 2.5 Hl., 5 Sp. NoYve, Orvughl Tykmn! .r-. _ ~. .a.v a.vw SP 6 Sabel Palmetto 6abd Palm - 10' - I6' CT, vaned Native. Dreu9hl Tolerant ~I • tie v5 ~ I 'i ~ ~~. lY 5 TaittlMm dktlchum Bala Cyprna - 2.5'COl 10'-11' IM., 5'-6' Sp. NoYve b WR 15 Weahkgtano mhualy Mvaimn Fan Pvim - 1D'-12' Clear TrvM DmugM TdenM _ <u_ RN9e 9IY EDIdtl6'dL SRNIIYY G4fII l3EYABtSS IA 71 NamJb pvlev Frn flusn 3 gal., 20' . 10' , NaYve, Drought Tolemnt i f ~ IS l'A Hgauv Sp•cW Nbtvcua 9a1.. 20' . 20' I ~ MC 58 YMIenDergla capilade PFh MuhN 3 9a1. 20' a 20' NaVVe, Drought ioleranl T __ -2~"T -~ ~ P MF I]1 Nyrtimlhea Iragnm Simp•pn'a 6lapper 3 gv., 20' . 20' NvSvv. Drought Tylenol ~ ~„ • r M 109 flbapbbl•ple Indlcv 'MDa OM. Indan NavNOm J g01., 14'.14' OrOUght Tolerant `- [ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ID _ TD 6 Tripnyum d•clybWn DM. FbaMteNn Bran J 9a1., 10' a 20' Nally, Drought Tolerant ~ - ~ ~ VS OflOUxD m 300 VAwrnum wap•nwm uex G1Y lanT4ur•r $yndan4va Aurmrm LBYNDN 3 gyl., ID' a 20' DDfQ Draught TWUOM BEY6915 ~ y~ - r - "~"~ ~~ ~ 1 - ~ ~ k l DV 141 Dklsa repeb ~Iric n na 11'.16', I gal.0 10" oc nugnt Talenna t I -~ LC 332 Lantana mmara Lantana IB' • la', I gal. O 12' oa DrwgM Telerant A LV 60 Ilnape muemn 'VarkgaW' Vadagaled Llly Tun 11~a19". I ygl0 Ifi' oc OnvgM ial•nnl ~j ~ NORTH style. ,~=ao leel .~ Rnbew~ 1® ~, I. ,, ,Il~rl 1.1 ••„I,I,~,. `~°_a--,~.. s:° ,,.,~. ~~~ Pine Beny Senior Limited Partnership PINE BERRY APARTMENTS """ ~ - "` LA 1 re LnlbDtO•NWrsta•~ Pya00.Arppyt{FIDllp 2206 JD-MDrivt LANDSCAPE PLAN '°'° _ A ~~~~~~ Sara9DteFL 34271 tl~~ ~, _,=o Le`12