Loading...
FLD2009-08026 - 300 Hamden Dr - Tropicana Resort - Hotel Ai FLD2009-08026 300 HAMDEN DR ROPICANA RESORT -HOTEL PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 276A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 08/03/2009 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC CDB: Good Afternoon, I will be sending the Staff report to these documents on Thursday, November 12, 2009 before SPM. Thank you, Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning and Development Department 727-562-4582 CDB Meeting Date: November 17, 2009 Case Number: FLD2009-08026 (Related to DVA2009-00002; and FLD2009- 08027/DVA2009-00003 and FLD2009-09036) Agenda Item: D.1. (Related to E.l.; and D.2., D.3. and E.2.) Owners: John Conti Francesco Camera Agostino DeGiovanni as Co-Trustees of Tropicana Resort Land Trust Applicant: Tropicana Resort Motels, LLC Representative: E D. Armstron Ig II Esquire Johnson Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP Address: 300 Hamden Drive (including 301 305, 309 and 315 Coronado Drive and a portion of 316 Hamden Drive) CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a 142-room overnight accommodation use, 3,900 square feet of retail sales floor area and 2,750 square feet of restaurant floor area in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 48,190.53 square feet (1.106 acres), a lot width of 167 feet along Hamden Drive, 220 feet along Third Street and 243.68 feet along Coronado Drive, a front (east) setback along Hamden Drive of 9.3 feet (to building), 6.5 feet (to upper level balconies) and 13.8 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback along Third Street of 11.8 feet (to building), 6.7 feet (to upper level balconies) and five feet (to patio), a front (west) setback along Coronado Drive of 16 feet (to building), 12 feet (to upper level balconies) and 5.4 feet (to patio), a side (south and east) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement adjacent to proposed Hotel B), a side (south) setback of 21 feet (to building adjacent to Coronado Drive), a building height of 74.33 feet (from BFE to flat roof) and 82 feet (to top of architectural embellishments) and 182 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.C, and approval of a two-year development order; and (2) Increase the permitted density by the allocation of 95 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH) Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 1 of 15 BEACH BY DESIGN Small Motel CHARACTER DISTRICT: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: 46-room motel and 138-seat restaurant Proposed Use: Overnight accommodation use of a total of 142 rooms (148.90 rooms/acre on net lot acreage, including the allocation of 95 units from the Hotel Density Reserve), restaurant use of 2,750 square feet, retail sales use of 3,900 square feet (0.137 FAR for restaurant and retail sales uses based on total lot area) and approximately 5,190 square feet of accessory uses to the hotel at a height of 74.33 feet (to flat roof deck) EXISTING SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: North:Tourist (T) District South:Tourist (T) District Overnight accommodations Retail sales, Offices and Overnight accommodations Clearwater Harbor Overnight accommodations, Restaurant and Retail sales East: Preservation (P) District West: Tourist (T) District ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.106 acres located on the south side of Third Street between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive. The subject property is currently developed with a 46-room motel and 138-seat restaurant. The subject site has approximately 243 feet of frontage along Coronado Drive and 220 feet of frontage along Third Street. The subject property is being modified from its platted and developed property lines to accommodate the proposed development and will have approximately 167 feet of frontage along Hamden Drive. There are also four waterfront lots on the east side of Hamden Drive that are attached to the properties on the west side of Hamden Drive and are 10-foot in depth from Hamden Drive to the water. The waterfront lots are also being modified to coincide with this proposed hotel (Hotel A) and the adjacent hotel under FLD2009-08027 at 316 Hamden Drive (Hotel B). There are existing docks in varying conditions of deterioration for approximately 20 boats. On January 16, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved Case FLD2006- 10054 with eight conditions of approval for the same subject property, permitting a commercial dock for 20 slips totaling 2,734 square feet to be used in conjunction with the existing motels. The applicant complied with conditions of approval to record Declarations of Unity of Title, record drainage easements and apply for an upland permit to construct fire risers for the docks (BCP2007-08185). This building permit for the fire risers was not pursued and the permit was voided, placing this approval in an expired status. Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 2 of 15 Other overnight accommodation uses exist to the north of the subject property. The Aqualea/Hyatt overnight accommodation project and public parking garage is directly across Coronado Drive from this subject property. Also directly across Coronado Drive is the existing Surf Style retail sales and Britts restaurant property, which is the subject of a proposed redevelopment project for expanded retail sales and restaurant floor area and a parking garage. Properties to the south of the subject property along Coronado Drive include overnight accommodation uses, retail sales and service uses and a restaurant. The proposed Hotel B at 316 Hamden Drive is adjacent to the south. Clearwater Harbor exists to the east of the subject property. Development Proposal: The proposal is to construct a 142-unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 148.90 rooms/acre (based on net lot acreage), which includes the allocation of 95 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design. Besides the hotel, a 2,750 square-foot restaurant and 3,900 square feet of retail sales uses are proposed as primary uses along Coronado Drive (0.137 FAR for restaurant and retail sales uses, based on original lot square footage). Aland use intensity calculation has been performed for this proposal to ensure the gross floor area of commercial floor area and the number of hotel rooms complies with the maximum allowable intensity through the future land use category and Beach by Design. The proposal also includes approximately 5,190 square feet of accessory uses to the hotel (meeting rooms and an exercise room), which represents approximately 6.27 percent of the gross floor area of the hotel, in compliance with recently adopted Code provisions. This is the third hotel to be placed on the Community Development Board agenda since the amendment of Beach by Design in July 2008 creating the Hotel Density Reserve as a means to encourage the construction of new mid-size hotels on the beach in response to the loss of hotel rooms since 2002. Also on this CDB agenda is a companion Development Agreement (DVA2009-00002) that must be approved by City Council, which provides for the allocation of the 95 units from the Hotel Density Reserve. This Development Agreement provides for mandatory evacuation/closure of the hotel in the event of the posting of a hurricane watch including Clearwater Beach by the National Hurricane Center, which also complies with Beach by Design criteria. The applicant indicates room rates for this hotel will be reasonably priced for a family beach vacation contrasted with the Sandpearl and Aqualea/Hyatt resorts. This proposal complies with the Beach by Design criteria to access all rooms through a lobby and internal corridors. This proposal is also related to a proposed overnight accommodation use at 316 Hamden Drive (FLD2009-08027/DVA2009-00003, Hotel B). These two hotels are joined through the parking garage and amenity levels at the southeast portion of this subject property. The proposal includes redefining or modifying lot lines from that existing. The proposed Hotel A parcel is made up of three existing parcels and a portion of a fourth parcel. A recommended condition of approval will require the recording of a Minor Lot Adjustment prior to the issuance of any permits, so that the new lot line locations will be corrected in accordance with this application. In compliance with the conditions of approval for Case FLD2006-10054 for the docks (now expired), the applicant recorded three Declaration of Unity of Title documents, tying the water lots to the main lots on the west side of Hamden Drive. As part of the Minor Lot Adjustment process, Staff will prepare Release of Unity of Title documents for the prior recorded Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 3 of 15 documents, as well as new Declaration of Unity of Title documents corresponding to the new parcels for Hotels A and B. The proposed 142-room hotel is proposed on 1.106 acres that is designed with frontages along Hamden Drive, Third Street and Coronado Drive. The hotel is proposed at a height of 74.33 feet from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the flat roof deck and at a height of 82 feet to the top of architectural embellishments that gives visual interest to the top of the building. The hotel will take primary access from Hamden Drive, but will have a secondary access driveway on Coronado Drive. A covered entry portico and drop-off area off Hamden Drive is designed directly south of the hotel lobby. The ground level of this hotel provides the hotel lobby and 4,520 square feet of meeting rooms. The 2,750 square-foot restaurant is located on the ground level at the northwest corner of the hotel (at the intersection of Coronado Drive and Third Street). Retail sales uses of 3,900 square feet are also located on the ground floor along, and oriented to, Coronado Drive. The restaurant with an outdoor seating area and the retail sales uses will assist in activating the street frontage along Coronado Drive. While located within the hotel building, the restaurant and retail sales uses are designed as primary uses, not accessory uses to the hotel, and they will serve the needs of beach customers as well as hotel guests. The ground through third floors of this hotel on this subject property provide a total of 182 parking spaces of the total 302 spaces in the overall parking garage between Hotels A and B. The fourth level provides an outdoor amenity deck for a swimming pool and other outdoor activities. The fourth level of the hotel also has 34 rooms and the exercise room. The fifth, sixth and seventh floors provide 36 rooms per floor. All parking garage levels will be open for natural ventilation. Balconies are provided for. many guest rooms on all sides of the hotel building: The .proposed 74.33-foot building height for this project transitions building height from the highest on the west side of Coronado Drive (Aqualea/Hyatt - 150-foot maximum height) to the detached dwellings to the northeast of this site on Devon Drive (30-foot maximum height). The exterior base and body colors of the building will be primarily Roman Column, Welcome White and Compatible Cream. Wall accents will be Copper Mountain at the base and white trim. Roof tiles will be Spanish the of reds and gray-browns, while metal awnings will be a burgundy color. All areas within the setbacks provided will be landscaped to enhance the site and building. The proposal includes setback reductions to various structures around the perimeter of the proposed parcel. The minimum required front setback for overnight accommodation, restaurant and retail sales uses under the Tourist (T) District is 15 feet. The building is proposed with a front (east) setback along Hamden Drive of 9.3 feet (to building), 6.5 feet (to upper level balconies) and 13.8 feet (to pavement). The front building setback is to the parking garage area (Levels 1 - 4), whereas the actual hotel tower will be set back 10.4 feet (all levels). Front (north) setbacks proposed along Third Street include 11.8 feet (to building), 6.7 feet (to upper level balconies) and five feet (to patio). Along Coronado Drive, front setbacks of 16 feet (to building), 12 feet (to upper level balconies) and 5.4 feet (to patio) are proposed. Minimum side setbacks for overnight accommodation, restaurant and retail sales uses are 10 feet. The proposal includes a side (south and east) setback of zero feet, where the building and pavement are adjacent to the proposed Hotel B. The building is proposed at a side (south) setback of 21 feet adjacent to the common property line of 317 Coronado Drive. Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 4 of 15 There is a retention vault proposed under the ramp in the parking garage from the first to the second floor. There is also a retention pond for water quality purposes proposed along the south side of the Hotel A building adjacent to 317 Coronado Drive. The outfall structure at this retention pond will allow overflow water to flow through pipes traversing the Hotel B property, joining up to an existing drainage pipe crossing Hamden Drive and through the seawall on the east side of Hamden Drive. Docks that will be accessory to and serve both Hotels A and B are also being processed on this same CDB agenda under Case No. FLD2009-09036. These docks will be accessible to the guests of the hotels by a walkway from the public sidewalk along the east side of Hamden Drive. The existing paved areas on the water lots will be removed and the water lots landscaped as an enhancement to the hotels. Existing overhead utility lines running along the east side of Hamden Drive will be placed underground with this proposal. The proposal includes seven-foot. wide sidewalks along both sides of Hamden Drive and along Third Street. The applicant is requesting atwo-year development order due to market conditions. Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4-407 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. Density/Intensity: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation rooms per acre and the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is 1.0. The applicant and Planning and Development Department Staff have prepared a "mixed use" calculation to ensure the maximum allowable intensity is not exceeded. Based on the 6,650 square feet of commercial floor area proposed as primary uses along Coronado Drive, this floor area was subtracted from the proposed lot area of 48,190.53 square feet (1.106 acres) to determine the net lot acreage for the purposes of determining the maximum number of hotel rooms allowable (both for the base density and the maximum permissible for the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design [adopted as an amendment to Beach by Design under Ordinance 7925-08]). Based on the net lot acreage of 0.9536 acres and the base density of 50 rooms/acre, a maximum of 47 rooms is permitted. Based on the same net lot acreage and the maximum density under the Hotel Density Reserve of 150 rooms per acre, a maximum of 143 rooms is permissible. When the base density number of rooms is subtracted from the overall maximum under the Hotel Density Reserve, the maximum number of rooms the applicant could request from the Hotel Density Reserve is 96 rooms. The applicant is only requesting 95 rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve. As such, the proposed FAR, based on the original lot square footage) is 0.137 and the proposed density is 148.90 rooms/acre, based on the net lot acreage, which meets the maximum intensity established in Beach by Design for projects that have acquired units from the Hotel Density Reserve. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed I.S.R. is 0.752, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 5 of 15 Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum lot area for overnight accommodations can range between 10,000 - 20,000 square feet and for restaurants and retail sales uses the range is 5,000 - 10,000 square feet. The overall proposed site is 48,190.53 square feet of lot area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for overnight accommodations can range between 100 - 150 feet and for restaurants and retail sales uses the range is 50 - 100 feet. For the proposed Hotel A site, the lot width along Coronado Drive is approximately 243 feet and 220 feet of lot width along Third Street. The subject property is being modified from its platted and developed property lines to accommodate the proposed development and will have approximately 167 feet of frontage along Hamden Drive. The proposal exceeds these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum front setback for overnight accommodations, restaurants and retail sales uses can range between 0 - 15 feet (this site must meet front setbacks along Hamden Drive, Third Street and Coronado Drive), while the minimum side setback can range between 0 - 10 feet (structures on corner lots must meet front setbacks along rights-of--way and meet side setbacks adjacent to the other property lines). The proposal includes setback reductions to various structures around the perimeter of the proposed parcel. The building is proposed with a front (east) setback along Hamden Drive of 9.3 feet (to building), 6.5 feet (to upper level balconies) and 13.8 feet (to pavement). The front building setback is to the parking garage area (Levels 1 - 4), whereas the actual hotel building will be setback 10.4 feet (all levels). Front (north) setbacks proposed along Third Street include 11.8 feet (to building), 6.7 feet (to upper level balconies) and five feet (to patio). Along Coronado Drive, front setbacks of 16 feet (to building), 12 feet (to upper level balconies) and 5.4 feet (to patio) are proposed. Minimum side setbacks for overnight accommodation uses are 10 feet. The proposal includes a side (south and east) setback of zero feet, where the building and pavement are adjacent to the proposed Hotel B. The building is proposed at a side (south) setback of 21 feet adjacent to the common property line of 317 Coronado Drive. It is important to note that the proposed building will exceed the minimum front setback along Coronado Drive (16-foot setback proposed). While upper level balconies will be closer to the front property line, the actual building will be set back so it is not adjacent to (on top of) the street. The balconies will break up the facade of the building and are not designed linearly on each floor. While the Aqualea/Hyatt project dedicated 10 feet for additional right-of--way for Coronado Drive, that building is located at a zero front setback to Coronado Drive. The ground- level, outdoor dining area will be set back 5.4 feet from the front property line along Coronado Drive, but the sidewalks to the south in front of the retail sales uses will undulate at greater setbacks, thereby providing the minimum five-foot wide foundation landscape area along this side of the building. The reduced setback for this ground-level patio and sidewalk will contribute to a more active and dynamic street life along Coronado Drive. While the proposal includes a 11.8-foot front setback from the Third Street property line, this setback is to two portions of the building. There are other portions of the building at a 20-foot or greater setback. The outdoor seating area for the restaurant, located only at the northwest corner of this property, is designed at a five-foot front setback from Third Street. The fact that the building faces water across the roadway mitigates the front setback reduction along Hamden Drive. Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 6 of 15 Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the maximum allowable height for restaurants can range between 25 - 100 feet, while overnight accommodation and retail sales uses can range between 35 - 100 feet. The proposed building is 74.33 feet in height from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the flat roof, which is below the Code maximum. The request has also been advertised to reflect the proposed height of 82 feet to the top of architectural embellishments, where such features give visual interest to the top of the building. This site is located within the Small Motel character district of Beach by Design, which does not prescribe any maximum heights for this area. Good planning practice is to transition building heights from a compatibility standpoint. The Aqualea/Hyatt overnight accommodation project at 301 S. Gulfview Boulevard (across Coronado Drive from the subject property) was approved with a 150-foot building height (Case Nos. FL Ol-O1-O1 and FLD2004-07052). The detached dwellings on Devon Drive to the northeast of this site are zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District where the maximum building height is 30 feet. The proposed building height for this project transitions building height from the highest on the west side of Coronado Drive. to the detached dwellings to the east of this site. Minimum Off-Street Parkin: Pursuant to CDC Table Z-803, the minimum required parking for. overnight accommodations is 1.2 parking spaces per room. Additionally, parking for restaurants can range between 7 - 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet and parking for retail sales uses can range between 4 - 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. This proposal has been designed with a parking garage shared with the proposed Hotel B at 316 Hamden Drive (FLD2009-08027). Hotel B is proposed with 118 rooms and 1,335 square feet of retail sales use. CDC Section 3-1405 requires two or more uses to calculate parking based on a Shared Parking basis. When taking all uses into account for both Hotels A and B and the Shared Parking calculation, the required parking totals 376 parking spaces. The shared parking garage proposes a total of 302 parking spaces. On the Hotel A site there will be 182 parking spaces, while 120 parking spaces are proposed on the Hotel B site. The proposal includes a reduction to required parking from 376 to 302 spaces. A Parking Reduction Study has been submitted as part of the application material, which has analyzed the parking demand against the proposed parking supply. This study concludes that adequate parking will be available on-site to service the proposed uses of both sites for guests, employees and customers. A minority of the customers (40%) for the restaurant and retail sales uses will need to park on-site, where many of the customers will be from the on-site Hotels A and B or as walk-up customers that have parked or are staying elsewhere on the beach. Eighty percent (80%) of the employees are presumed to need to park on-site. Hotel A is self-sufficient for parking (with its 180 spaces) and access without the construction of Hotel B and its attendant parking garage, with the exception of a drive aisle connecting the parking accessed from the driveway on Coronado Drive and the shared trash collection area. From an amenities standpoint accessory to the hotel, the proposal includes a meeting room of approximately 4,520 square feet and an exercise room of approximately 670 square feet, or a total of approximately 5,190 square feet (6.27 % of the gross floor area of Hotel A). With such minimal amenities, the provided parking appears adequate for guests, employees and customers. This proposal will take primary driveway access from Hamden Drive, while a secondary driveway is proposed on Coronado Drive. Existing driveways on Coronado Drive, Third Street and Hamden Drive, including all back-out parking, will be removed. With the proposed Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 7 of 15 driveway on Coronado Drive, there will be no loss of on-street parallel parking. A total of five parallel parking spaces along Coronado Drive will remain. An existing seven-foot wide sidewalk exists along Coronado Drive. Seven-foot wide sidewalks will be constructed for the site frontages along Third Street and both sides of Hamden Drive. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. There will be mechanical equipment located on top of the flat roof of the building. The parapets surrounding the roof may be insufficient to screen the mechanical equipment and additional screening may be required. This will be reviewed at time of the building permit submission. Access to the roof for maintenance of these rooftop units will be by the stairwell that exits toward Coronado Drive. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the proposed driveways on Hamden Drive and Coronado Drive, and the street intersections of Coronado Drive/Third Street and Hamden Drive/Third Street, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. A portion of the outdoor seating area for the restaurant at the intersection of Coronado Drive/Third Street is proposed within the sight visibility triangle. This encroachment has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Shrubbery planted within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet-the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this. hotel will be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. There exist overhead utility lines within the right-of--way along the east side of Hamden Drive. The proposal will underground these existing overhead lines along the site frontage on Hamden Drive. It is unknown of the location of proposed electric panels, boxes and meters for this Hotel A. If located exterior to the building, to ensure views are minimized, this electrical equipment should be painted the same color as the building. The location and potential views of such electrical equipment will be addressed at the building permit stage. Landscaping; Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this overall site. This proposal meets or exceeds the required minimum five- foot wide building foundation landscape area along Coronado Drive, Third Street and Hamden Drive. Along Coronado Drive, the landscaping is provided between the public sidewalk and on-site access sidewalks and the restaurant outdoor seating area adjacent to the building. Along Hamden Drive, the landscaping is provided between the property line and the building and the drop-off zone pavement. The overall site for both Hotels A and B will be planted with a various palm trees (Florida royal, coconut, pigmy date, Senegal date and medjool date), buttonwood trees, shrubs (Indian hawthorn, schefflera, ixora, podocarpus and petite pink oleander) and ground covers (jasmine, green carpet natal plum, variegated flax lily and gold mound duranta). Landscaping assists with softening and reducing building massing to both pedestrians and motorists. Since the Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 8 of 15 sidewalks planned in the Third Street and Hamden Drive rights-of--way will be adjacent to the street curb, landscaping is also planned within the rights-of--way, which will require aRight-of- Way Use Permit. The waterfront lots on the east side of Hamden Drive are also planned to be planted for beautification of the site. Solid Waste: A compactor dumpster is proposed for both Hotels A and B, to be located in a trash and compactor room on the Hotel B property. Hotel housekeeping staff will remove trash from hotel units. It is presumed that the restaurant and retail sales employees will transport their trash to the compactor dumpster. In the event Hotel A is constructed in advance of Hotel B, a temporary trash enclosure will need to be constructed through an appropriate easement. Any such temporary trash enclosure will need to be consistent with the material and color of the Hotel A building. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si a e: The proposal does not include a freestanding sign at this time.. However, any future freestanding sign should be designed as a monument-style sign, match the exterior materials and color of the building and be a maximum height of four feet, unless approved at six-foot height through a Comprehensive Sign Program, in accordance with the flexibility criteria of CDC Section 2-803:L3. Attached signage must meet Code requirements. Additional Beach by Design Guidelines: Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed hotel building footprint is approximately 14,004 square feet. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 152 feet along Coronado Drive,. 194 feet along Third Street and 62 feet along Hamden Drive, while the vertical plane is approximately 79 feet from grade. to the top of the flat roof. None of these dimensions are equal. Modulation of the building massing. also provides considerable dimensional variation. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. All facades of the building have been designed in compliance with this requirement, with the largest linear dimension of approximately 89 feet along the Coronado Drive "center" portion of the building. All other portions of the building facade are modulated with at least afive-foot deviation, whether along the street frontages or on the "back" side of the building. For the parking garage portions of the building, the linear dimensions are approximately 86 feet along the Coronado Drive side and approximately 87 feet along the Hamden Drive side of the building. The southern side of the parking garage off Coronado Drive is 100 feet to the Hotel B building. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has calculated the west elevation along Coronado Drive at 70 percent, the north elevation along Third Street at 62 percent, the east elevation along Hamden Drive at 66 percent and the south elevation at 64 percent. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is an active Code Enforcement case at 301 and 305 Coronado Drive for pennants at the restaurant (BIZ2009-00413). Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 9 of 15 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-801.1 and 2- 803: Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent Density 50 units/rooms per acre 142 units/rooms (148.90 X' units/rooms er net acre)' Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0 6,650 square feet (0.137 XZ based on original lot square foota e) Im ervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.752 X3 Minimum Lot Area Overnight accommodations: 48,190.53 sq. ft. X3 10,000 - 20,000 sf Restaurant: 5,000 - 10,000 sf Retail Sales: 5,000 - 10,000 sf Minimum Lot Width Ovemight accommodations: Hamden Drive: 167 feet X' 100 - 150 feet Restaurant: 50 - 100 feet Third Street: 220 feet Retail Sales: 50 - 100 feet Coronado Drive: 243 feet Minimum Setbacks Front: 0 - 15 feet Hamden Drive: 9.3 feet (to X3 building); 6.5 feet (to upper level balconies); 13.8 feet (to pavement) Third Street: 11.8 feet (to building), 6.7 feet (to upper level balconies); five feet (to patio) Coronado Drive: 16 feet (to building); 12 feet (to upper level balconies); 5.4 feet (to atio) Side: 0 - 10 feet South: 0 feet (to building X' and pavement adjacent to proposed Hotel B) East:: 0 feet (to building and pavement adjacent to proposed Hotel B) South: 21 feet (to building ad acent to Coronado Dr.) Maximum Height 35 - 100 feet 74.33 feet (from BFE to flat X3 roof) and 82 feet (to top of architectural embellishments) Minimum Overnight accommodations: 1.2 302 total parking spaces X4 Off-Street Parking parking spaces per uniUroom (376 spaces required per Restaurant: 7 - 15 spaces per Shared Parking calculation; 1,000 square feet 182 spaces on Hotel A Retail Sales: 4 - 5 spaces per property) 1,000 s uare feet ~ Ltclndes 95 units/rooms allocated from the Hotel Density Reserve pursuant to Beach by Design '- Based on n "mixed use ° calculation; See nnnlysis in Sinff Report 3 See nnnlysis in StnfJReport a Based on Parking Reduction Study; See nnnlysis in Staff Report Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 10 of 15 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.C (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X' the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X~ development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X' development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X' category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or a. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X~ parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. ~ See analysis in Staff Report. Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 11 of 15 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X' adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X' 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X' immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X' visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent pro erties. ~ See nnnlysis in Stnff Report. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of September 3, 2009, and October 1, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is cribctantial rpmpetent evirlenre to gitppnrt the fnll~wina _fi_nrlingc of fart; 1. The 1.106 acres is located on the south side of Third Street between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive; 2. The proposed Hotel A parcel is made up of three existing parcels and a portion of a fourth parcel, which will be modified through a Minor Lot Adjustment so that the property lines will coincide with the new lot line locations proposed with this application; 3. The proposal is to construct a 142-unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 148.90 rooms/acre, which includes the allocation of 95 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design; 4. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2009-00002) that must be approved by City Council is also on this CDB agenda, providing for the allocation of the 95 units from the Hotel Density Reserve; 5. In addition to the hotel, this proposal includes a 2,750 square-foot restaurant and 3,900 square feet of retail uses as primary uses along Coronado Drive (0.137 FAR for restaurant and retail sales uses, based on original lot square footage); 6. The proposal also includes approximately 5,190 square feet of accessory uses to the hotel (meeting rooms and an exercise room), which represents approximately 6.27 percent of the gross floor area of the hotel; Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 12 of 15 7. The hotel is proposed at a height of 74.33 feet from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the roof deck and 82 feet (to the top of architectural embellishments); 8. The proposed 74.33-foot building height transitions building height from the highest on the west side of Coronado Drive (Aqualea/Hyatt - 150-foot maximum height) to the detached dwellings to the northeast of this site (30-foot maximum height); 9. The ground through third floors of this hotel on this subject property provide a total of 182 parking spaces of the total 302 spaces in the overall parking garage between Hotels A and B; 10. The proposal includes setback reductions from all property lines, except adjacent to 317 Coronado Drive; 11. The hotel is proposed with a front (east) setback along Hamden Drive of 9.3 feet (to building), 6.5 feet (to upper level balconies) and 13.8 feet (to pavement). The advertised front building setback is to the parking garage area (Levels 1 - 4), whereas the actual hotel tower will be set back 10.4 feet (all levels); 12. The proposal includes setback reductions to the front (north) setbacks proposed along Third Street of 11.8 feet (to building), 6.7 feet (to upper level balconies) and five feet (to patio). The advertised building front setback is to two portions of the building, while other portions of the building at a 20-foot or greater setback; 13. Along Coronado Drive, front setbacks of 16 feet (to building), 12 feet (to upper level balconies) and 5.4 feet (to patio) are proposed. The building exceeds the minimum front setback of 15 feet; 14. The proposal includes a side (south and east) setback of zero feet, where the building and pavement are adjacent to the proposed Hotel B; and 15. The active Code Enforcement issue associated with this subject property :does not affect the development proposal. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2- 803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Flexible Development application to permit a 142-room overnight accommodation use, 3,900 square feet of retail sales floor area and 2,750 square feet of restaurant floor area in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 48,190.53 square feet (1.106 acres), a lot width of 167 feet along Hamden Drive, 220 feet along Third Street and 243.68 feet along Coronado Drive, a front (east) setback along Hamden Drive of 9.3 feet (to building), 6.5 feet (to upper level balconies) and 13.8 feet (to pavement), a front (north) setback along Third Street of 11.8 feet (to building), 6.7 feet (to upper level balconies) and five feet (to patio), a front (west) setback along Coronado Drive of 16 feet (to building), 12 feet (to upper level balconies) and 5.4 feet (to patio), a side Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 13 of 15 (south and east) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement adjacent to proposed Hotel B), a side (south) setback of 21 feet (to building adjacent to Coronado Drive), a building height of 74.33 feet (from BFE to flat roof) and 82 feet (to top of architectural embellishments) and 182 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.C, and approval of a two-year development order; and (2) Increase the permitted density by the allocation of 95 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2009-00002); 2. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than November 17, 2011, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, a Minor Lot Adjustment, Releases of Unity of Title and new Declarations of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 5. That, in the event Hotel A is constructed prior to Hotel B, plans be revised prior to the issuance of any building permit to show ground level parking areas be connected through a paved drive aisle on Hotel B property and an appropriately sized and located trash enclosure meeting City standards. Appropriate easements for such shall be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That any freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building and be a maximum height of four feet, unless approved at six-foot height through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 7. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law; 8. That, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a hurricane evacuation plan for the hotel and accessory docks be submitted and approved by the City for all guests of the hotel; 9. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, plans be revised to show mirrors and/or other devices to aid motorists with blind spots in the parking garage; 10. That, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, cross easements for parking, drainage, fire systems, maintenance, etc. be recorded in the public records; 11. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, existing overhead utility lines within the right-of--way along the east side of Hamden Drive be placed underground; 12. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from adjacent roadways, be painted the same color as the building; 13. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 15. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, plans be revised to: a. clearly indicate seven-foot sidewalks to be constructed along Hamden Drive; Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 14 of 15 b. show visibility triangles on Sheet Ll.l; and c. dimension the height from the top of the roof deck to the top of the stair tower that exits to Coronado Drive; and 16. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Fire Departments be addressed. Prepared by Planning and Development Depart ent Staff: Wayne M. W ls, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ^ Location Map ^ Aerial Map ^ Zoning Map ^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ^ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepnranentlC D BIFLEX (FLDJ (Pending cased Up for dte nest CDBIHamden 300 Ti•opicann Resort Hotel A (T) 2009.xx - 1 /. /7.09 CDB - WWIHmnden 300 Hotel A FLD Stnff Reporcdoc Community Development Board -November 17, 2009 FLD2009-08026 -Page 15 of 15 Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-562-4504 ~ Email: rvayne.~~~ells(nrnyclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ^ Planner III Planning and Development Department, City of Clearwater, FL November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; Reviewed building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). ^ Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director; Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Dept. of Planning and Development, Bradenton, FL June 1984 to March 1989 iiauied aiiu super'viseu uucc cui~ivycc~, rict~aicu auu ~icscuicu variances auu aplicais w tuc tsuarci of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; Supervised six employees; Prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; Investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section -Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). ^ Planner I Alachua County Dept. of Planning and Development, Gainesville, FL June 1980 to June 1984 Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern -Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; Drafted ordinance revisions; General research. ^ Graduate Assistant University of Florida Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Gainesville, FL 1979 to 1981 Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; Coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. ^ Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Primarily prepared graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1'/2 years; Worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section ~ ~~ tier a} ~ ~ CauseweN Bard ~, _a d ~ ~ ~ a z PROJECT o ~~asr ' sr SITE m >z 4 SECONp OEj,O~~ ST QR ilifRp SS_W p is O Q¢ ~~~4VA'fF~ Dli FfFTF~ ST -```\~ vi Q BAYSIDE ~~ OR (/ BR rn'RY ~.~-~ -~-~ ~y~- s ~ ~~~ ~~~j ~ • I//i ~ kFW ~@ ~~ ~VO ~~//~~ g ~ o ~ S N A `~S ~ LOCATION MAP Owner: Agostino DiGiovanni, Francesco Carriera Cases: FLD2009-08026 and John Conti, co-trustees of the DVA2009-00002 Tro icana Resort Land Trust Site: 300 Hamden Drive (Hotel A) Property Size: 1.108 acres PINs: 08-29-15-17604-000-0010 Atlas Page: 276A 08-29-15-17604-000-0020 (Portion of) 08-29-15-17586-001-0010 08-29-15-17586-001-0040 N ~' A `~ ~ 98 7 y zo> ~o° ~ L y n j° z 207 2>2 2osLOCrR 2>5 213 ^n~ 217 218 T li ^~, ^ ,,~ '~ 2>6 ry0 ^ 221 00 ^rya ~ 224 ^^h ^ry ^`~~ M a 225 1 ^~ ,~° ^ ~ ~o 229 230 229 N ^ ^y~ ^ ^ 230 O~/~ 301 300 251 30 305 309 311 312 ~ 316 31 315 19LOCTR 317 5 P 320 31g 326 32> 323 3?5 326 3 332 327 325 331 330 333 33? 333 333 347 o a o ^ o 34> ~ ~ 347 343 342 345 351 348 346 h 345 ° o o ^ ^ ~ ^ ~ n a ~ ^ ~^ ~ ~ N M1 ~ 347 35 3 ZONING MAP Owner: Agostino DiGiovanni, Francesco Carriera Cases: FLD2009-08026 and John Conti, co-trustees of the DVA2009-00002 Tro icana Resort Land Trust Site: 300 Hamden Drive (Hotel A) Property Size: 1.108 acres PINS: 08-29-15-17604-000-0010 Atlas Page: 276A 08-29-15-17604-000-0020 (Portion of) 08-29-15-17586-001-0010 08-29-15-17586-001-0040 2 I ~ ~a ~~ boo ~ ~ might ~ • 1 S 07-29-15 PARC INFO _ ~~ u• 59 - _ i '~~rp~o#~ ccq~amo ad ti~ s`~` ~ ~ ~ - Beach I ~~ ~ - ~ TS ~.~ a o FRS ~ T 94 3 ~ ° _ I I I I I Io 1 eo m z z _ _ _ _ - 149 p9 5° I51 < ~5 INI //''~~~ 9e 4 96 97 1 z ' , - ~ 1 ~ _ - _ _ 1201 s2 I Q Va P •n ~o0 5 - ss O 207 ~ t t ac - a talc _ 212 - - - ~m~rer-ar3r 0 r- O w i~g 8 - - - I ~~'li3IIg'LOt W ""o 9 1 O '~ 04914 g -J tp - 2fE ,~ ~ - I - - S' c oddtig~ Q "" "~ ~ " ry - 70 , o eta e NS N - 22 4 Z A " d` 12 7a 1 -~ _ O n 1 ~3 * 3 - - ~ ^'~ h 224 52 14 t5 1 _ _ M a e "~ ^"~ " ~ ,~ Beach 35 i - - i ~ - 1 - - ~ 22~ to " ~,„ 1 2?9 57 1 to~230 C~H~da~~ 50 w ~ sp "ry "n'y 2 70 4/~1 C~~ I ~ ~ _-_ cF u ~ @lli~ ' 4 3 ~ =8 ^ 0 t 251 5 44 43 I - toy, / / _ _ - ~ co _ _ ~ 1 59 tosW30 _ - 70 305 - I~@'i~aui~aut ,A ea 315, -- ,p8 312 ~etaill- _ - _ tos 316 _ ~ ~1 19L~CTR 18 _ ttp 320 2A _ ~ - _ ~3 - tt- 326 ~1 .p 731s 1 ~- 64 L 2 3 2~j 7 -3- 3A r _' 113 ~~gl~ - _ so ~- -) L06446' _J r - I 4 330 65910 - CCO1Tl~Od~t10 S 31Js 4A ~- ~ 490 1 ~ 36398' ss i - - V~ ~ t 5 332 7UV ~ ~ tt5 g ~ d ti a o estuur nit - o A omni~p ^ on t 9 o 347 _ _ ~ 4s 4s a ,t7 ~~ni f _42 y o B/~/GyTwATEj? p 34 6 s ^ ~ 9 R „$ oda~io s EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: Agostino DiGiovanni, Francesco Carriera Cases: FLD2009-08026 and John Conti, co-trustees of the DVA2009-00002 Tro icana Resort Land Trust Site: 300 Hamden Drive (Hotel A) Property Size: 1.108 acres PINS: 08-29-15-17604-000-0010 Atlas Page: 276A 08-29-15-17604-000-0020 (Portion of) 08-29-15-17586-001-0010 08-29-15-17586-001-0040 1 > R ti I ~_ r ,, ~ r ;~ , ~ T +~. +~ "a ~ ~ ~ y~~ q.~~~~ ,l, ffl' v. k r ~ r ~..._~J~ ~~ `'~j~~ .l: ~n~ ~ ~~ ~~ ''1~ ~3° N ` ~ R.. -.. ~~ ~,!~- .I SCI.. - ~ E ,~ j4~' ~ k~." , ~ ~ . ,~ ~ iA T y R. •\ I~ i~ r -- a rIM,'1.1i ~, F- / ~ t ~ i'cT.r~ .~~Z' ~ ~"' ~ ) .E l ~ alt A~'. ~f T .-~ ~ ,>::~ -~ ~ _ ~` -,~, R' ~ a , <, ~ 1 i, r ~ 1::r . ~~ ai ,r, ~ - R '~~ ~ t 1N l r~: ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ t ~G' ~~ w~~ Q , ~`, ,h ~: y FA - s f ~'i ~ ~ L ~ ~ J PT ~~ ~ I bl ~ - ~ i~~. ~ - ' .., it -~ 1 ~ ~ J J -~ 1 ~' ' . ~ t 1. 1A w' ~k ~e :4.~• S 7 ~ l1~(: FF , R' 'a... i r='$' -44 ~,~. ~ x: 3+ -~ 'c~~ . • »~ f ~.. i ._ 1111'!', ~~= h/ , 1 +*'~ c~' '~E ~: `~' , IC-!~ Li ~: ° +Y` ~jl i ~ , ,;1~~~,~,.R{-[~-~~.~,}~;.. t 1, ff~ .~~, ~., - ~ I ~,, ~ ,~.~ y~,~ ~. ~!• ~h~. _ ~ ~~ 1.11 R ia. ~ AERIAL MAP Owner: Agostino DiGiovanni, Francesco Carriera Cases: FLD2009-08026 and John Conti, co-trustees of the DVA2009-00002 Tro icana Resort Land Trust Site: 300 Hamden Drive (Hotel A) Property Size: 1.108 acres PINS: 08-29-15-17604-000-0010 Atlas Page: 276A 08-29-15-17604-000-0020 (Portion of) 08-29-15-17586-001-0010 08-29-15-17586-001-0040 ~ .~• ~ .•e a, _ .. ~»~, , . p p~ ~~ '~~ ~ e ~ ";~ ~ _ View looking SW at subject property from intersection of Hamden Drive. and Third Street (Hotel A) -~--3-: /}..:rte `n ~ ai +~~ View looking S W at subject property along W side of Hamden Drive (Hotels A and B) iA ~ ~ .. .~~ ~..c` T Drive (Hotel A) 300 - 316 Hamden Drive FLD2009-08026/DVA2009-00002 and FLD2009-08027/DVA2009-00003 Page 1 of 2 View looking NW at subject property along W side of Hamden Drive (Hotel B; Aqualea/Hyatt in background) View looking NW at subject property along W side of Hamden Drive (Hotels A and B) ~~~ _~ ; ..,:.~: .mot View looking NE at subject property along E side of Coronado Drive (Hotel A) ". ' a n n wn n ~~ --n a nn n n------~ ~ u n n n n n wv~ r u u un u n ~. u n .. q ~i n _" • n non I unu n ;d ~i ii ~ !! ! it ii it ii e ,~.~~ . G O w~i~ G wri ~ ~tii ~i E~ w ~r rr ,' s .~ a ~~ View looking W from Hamden Drive along S side of Third Street (subject property on left; Aqualea/IIyatt in background) ---__ r~?" t .. . _.c~, View looking SE at motel at 333 Hamden Drive (S/SE of subject property -Hotel B) ,y., F" ', ® ~.Yw ,,~~~, rrocc ~',„ I. ~~ .:A 6Nt .~Y '~'..A'/L.:. J i{t unm ,: r+r.•: ~. , 300 - 316 Hamden Drive FLD2009-08026/DVA2009-00002 and FLD2009-08027/DVA2009-00003 Page 2 of 2 View looking NE along E side of Coronado Drive at existing development W of subject property (Hotel B) View looking NW along W side of Hamden Drive N of Third View looking NW at motel at 332 Hamden Drive (S of subject property -Hotel B) View looking NE at motel at 229 Coronado Drive N of subject properly (Hotel A) RESPONSES TO 10/1/09 DRC COMMENTS FLD2009-08026 - 300 Hamden Drive (Hotel A) GENERAL ENGINEERING: Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: Comment No. 1: The 6-inch water line to which tap is proposed on Sheet C5.1 (Coronado Drive side of property) is an abandoned water main. Tap will need to be made to the existing 6-inch water main located on the west side of Coronado Drive. Response No. 1: NES -Acknowledged, required prior to issuance of Building Permit. Comment No. 2: After utility cut is made across Coronado Dr. applicant shall mill and resurface a minimum 25-feet either side of the utility cut for the full width of the roadway due to Coronado Dr. being a newly resurfaced road. Response No. 2: NES -Acknowledged, required prior to issuance of Building Permit. Comment No. 3: Clarify how sanitary sewer is to be connected to City system. If a new connection is to be made to City manhole, provide rim and invert information. Response No. 3: NES -Acknowledged, required prior to issuance of Building Permit. Comment No. 4: Parking meters are shown as being removed on the demolition plan and then installed on the site plan. Depict on a plan the number and location of the existing public parking spaces and the number and location of the proposed public parking spaces. Response No. 4: NES -Acknowledged, required prior to issuance of Building Permit. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy: Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Professional Engineer. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed .project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. ENVIRONMENTAL: No issues. Please note: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact Pinellas County Air Quality (464-4422) for further information. FIRE: Comment No. 1: 9/22/2009 Fire Flow calculations are incorrect and incomplete. Spoke with Jeff at Griner Engineering. Advised building "A" will require a 1,000 GPM fire pump and building "B" will require a 750 GPM fire pump. Individual calculation forms are to be submitted to address each building with proper identification. Provide details. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 1: Fire Flow Calcs completed, See attached Calculation sheets. Comment No. 2: Provide a Life Safety Evaluation as to the operation of each system's capabilities to be zoned and identify alarm location. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. Response No. 2: Will acknowledge prior to building permit. Comment No. 3: 9/22/2009 We consider these buildings as one building as they sit on one foundation. If they are separate buildings how do you propose to separate the garages? ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 3: Acknowledged. Each Hotel is to stand as independent with respect to fire; however, fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems shall be inter-connected so as to operate as a single system with respect to operation and maintenance. 2 Comment No. 4: 9/24/2009 Response to comments under Fire comment #5 Acknowledged. Each Hotel is to stand as independent with respect to fire. The plans do not indicate two (2) fire pumps and they do not show the location of each room. Provide details. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 4 HARBOR MASTER: LEGAL: LAND RESOURCES: LANDSCAPING: Acknowledged. Both building A and B have individual Fire command rooms and fire pump rooms. No issues. No issues. No issues. Comment No. 1: Sheet L.1.1. -Trees cannot be planted within visibility triangles. Relocate trees from visibility triangles. Shrubs planted within the visibility triangles must be maintained to not exceed 30-inches in height. Response No. 1: Trees removed within triangles, note added to plan that all shrubs are to be 3' or less in height. Comment No. 2: Sheet L.1.1 -Unclear if the 3SK in the NW corner of Hotel A parcel are within tree grates or large pots, based on their location and the configuration of the outdoor cafe patio. Response No. 2: See Revised Landscape Plan. PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1: The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of a building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727-562-4837 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. 3 Comment No. 2: Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Debbie Reid at 727- 562-4818 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. STORMWATER: The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board: Comment No. 1: Actual length of the vault on the plan appears to be 35', not 65' as the vault plan view indicates. Please revise plans to show the correct dimension of the proposed vault. Response No. 1: NES - 65' is correct dimension. Please see revised Sheet C4.1. SOLID WASTE: No issues. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Turning template shows vehicle encroaching into opposing lane and hitting curb, re-design to eliminate these situations. Response No. 1: NES -Revised turning diagram submitted to Traffic Engineering and found to be satisfactory. Comment No. 2: In order to prevent vehicles such as passenger, bus and limousine from stacking into Hamden Drive re-design drop off zone to accommodate such queuing. Response No. 2: NES -Comment deleted per City Staff at DRC. Comment No. 3: Crosswalk shall be "ladder style" markings along Hamden Drive in front of the driveways. Add two parallel lines connecting the rungs. Response No. 3: NES -Marking adjusted per your request, please see revised C3.1. 4 Comment No. 4: The proposed driveway along Coronado Drive is highly discouraged due to degradation of level of service. Response No. 4: NES - During discussions at DRC, City Staff stated both Coronado and Hamden will most likely become one way, making this second point of ingress/egress even more necessary to the appropriate function of this development. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note 1: Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). Response: Acknowledged. General Note 2: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged. PLANNING: Comment No. 1: 9120/09 - WW See another Planning comment regarding balconies and distance from property lines. There are balconies not shown on Sheet A2 and errors where parking garage walls vs. balconies are indicated. Need to correct. Need to sit down and go over. 8/30/09-VWU Sheet A2 - Provide a dimension from the edge of the balconies to the property lines along Coronado Drive, Third Street and Hamden Drive for Levels 4 and above. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Drawings refined and coordinated. Maximum balcony extension is 1'-8" from face of building. Comment No. 2: 9/19/09-WW Need to sit down and go over where walls exist versus balconies. Floor plans and elevations are misleading as to locations of such. Need to properly show such in order to properly advertise the request. 8/7/09-VWV Floor plans and elevations -Floor plans need to show the exterior wall openings on all floors so that they can be coordinated with the door and window openings shown on the elevations. Balconies need to be 5 similarly shown/coordinated between the floor plans and elevations. For rooms on Level 4 that are adjacent to the amenity deck (pool), will there be some "fencing" to delineate private "balcony" from common deck area? Operationally, does it make sense that people desiring to go to the pool must travel through the exercise room? Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Drawings refined and coordinated. Comment No. 3: 9/20/09-WW Show at parking garage entrances on Sheets A3 and A4 and at the drop off zone for Hotel A. 8/30/09-WW Sheet A3 - Provide a vertical clearance dimension on the East elevation for. the drop-off zone entrance and the main driveway to the parking garage. Response No. 3: Acknowledged. Clearance shown as 12'-1" Comment No. 4: Sheet C4.1 -Section A-A -Revise section to show: a. a building wall rather than a retaining wall with a top elevation; and b. concrete pavement rather than asphalt. Response No. 4: NES -Please see revised Section provided on C6.3 Comment No. 5: 9/20/09-WW Case FLD2009-09036 has been submitted for the docks. Plans for this project need to show the fire risers. 8/26/09 - WW Reconstruction of docks for the existing hotels (as accessory to the hotels) approved under FLD2006-10054 has expired. When such redesigned docks are desired in the future, a new FLD application will be required to be submitted for CDB review. However, fire risers for, and sidewalk access to, the existing and/or future docks are necessary to be shown on site plans for this application. Response No. 5: NES -Please see revised Section provided on C5.1. Comment No. 6: 9/20/09-WW Did not find Beach by Design Sheet 1. Provide. 8/31/09-WW Show compliance with Section C.1 of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design: "Buildings with a 6 footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet or a single dimension of greater than one hundred (100) feet will be constructed so that no more than two (2) of the three (3) building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. For this purpose, equal in length means that the two lengths vary by less than forty percent (40%) of the shorter of the two (2) lengths. The horizontal plane measurements relate to the footprint of the building." Response No. 6: Acknowledged. See Sheets A5 and A6 for Beach by Design exhibits. Comment No. 7: Need to properly show in the East elevation a portion of the stair tower at the southwest corner on Level 4 (adjacent to Coronado Drive) and the trellis along the west side of Level 4 in the background. Response No. 7: Acknowledged. See Sheets Al-A7. Comment No. 8: 9/19/09-WW Need to sit down and go over where walls exist versus balconies. Floor plans and elevations are misleading as to locations of such. Need to properly show such in order to properly advertise the request. 8/7/09-WW Section 3-908.D only permits balconies to project a maximum of 24-inches from the face of the building (into a required setback). Dimension the depth of the balconies on the east, north and west sides of the building (based on architectural drawings on Sheet A2, it appears to be 5 and 6 feet in depth). Need to show such balcony projections on the site plan Sheet C3.1, with dimensions to the property lines. Will need to include in request for setback reductions. Response No. 8: Acknowledged. Refined and clarified wall locations and balcony offsets. Maximum balcony projection is 1'-8". Comment No. 9: Response to General Applicability criteria #4 -Revise the number of parking spaces appropriately to the correct number of spaces indicated on the plans (if 302 parking spaces is the actual number). Response No. 9: There are 302 parking spaces. Response #4 shown on Exhibit "B" has been revised accordingly. 7 Comment No. 10: Sheets Al and A2 -Darken parking stripes (too light to read). Response No. 10: Acknowledged. Comment No. 11: 9/19/09-WW Dimensions have been added to Sheet Al and Sheets A7 & A8 have been added (also showing dimensions). On Sheet A.1, add/modify the following dimensions: a. North/south dimension for Hotel A from the face of the building with the elevators to the north building wall closer to Third Street (minimum of five feet?) (north side of building); b. Eastlwest dimension for Hotel A from the front edge of the entry portico at its SE corner to the wall front at the generator for Hotel B (east side of building); c. East/west dimension for Hotel A from the westernmost wall edge to the wall edge for the stairs by the retail floor area (minimum of five feet?) (west side of building); and d. Eastlwest dimension for Hotel A along the south side of the building adjacent to the retention pond -you really mean that it is 100' maximum (suggest removing the 1 /8"). 8/26/09-WW To comply with the Beach by Design provision of a maximum 100-foot length of a linear facade before there is a deviation of at least five feet, provide facade dimensions on Sheets Al and A2 to verify compliance. Where such 100-foot maximum is not met, redesign to comply. Response No. 11: Acknowledged. See Sheets Al-A6. Comment No. 12: Sheet C1.1 and Exhibit A to the application - Legal description needs to change for the waterfront lots, due to the transfer from Hotel A parcel to Hotel B parcel of approximately 113 square feet to correct land area needs to provide for the 118 hotel room density. Response No. 12: The legal description has been revised accordingly. Comment No. 13: Sheet C2.1 -Add Note 17 to the southernmost dock. Response No. 13: NES - Note added to revised Sheet C2.1. 8 Comment No. 14: Sheets C2.1, C3.1, C3.2, C4.1, C5.1 and L.1.1 -Information within the rights-of-way and on adjacent property is unreadable (dots, not full letters and numbers). Make readable. Response No. 14: NES -Acknowledged. Comment No. 15: Page 1 of the application - Proposed Use - Revise restaurant square footage to 2,750 sf and retail square footage to 3,900 sf. Response No. 15: See revised Page 1. Comment No. 16: 9/26/09 - WW While the square footages of the meeting rooms (hotel A) and pool and exercise rooms (Hotels A and B) were provided, the other information was not. Need to address the comment below. If the percentage of accessory uses is less than 10% of the total floor area, then no additional parking spaces are required and no reduction to the number of rooms from the Reserve is necessary. 8/28/09-WW Sheet A2 -Need to provide the square footage of the "pool and exercise room" on Level 4, as this is an accessory use to the hotel. For Hotel A, need to provide a total accessory use square footage of the "hotel meeting rooms" and the "pool and exercise room". Need to provide the gross floor area of the hotel (total square footage). Need to indicate the percentage of accessory use square footage (see above) to the gross floor area. With the pending Code amendment for accessory uses for hotels under Ordinance No. 8044-09, need to address the following: b. Accessory uses located within the building interior may occupy between 10% and 15% of the gross floor area of the development, but only when additional parking is provided for that portion of the accessory uses which exceeds 10%. The required amount of parking shall be calculated by using the minimum off-street parking development standard for the most intensive accessory use(s). Where there is a range of parking standards, the lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate the additional amount of off-street parking required for the project. In projects where the interior accessory uses exceed 15% of the building gross floor area, all interior accessory uses shall be considered additional primary uses for purposes 9 of calculating development potential and parking requirements. c. In addition to the requirements above, for those projects that request additional rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design and whose interior accessory uses are between 5% and 15% of the gross floor area of the proposed building, density shall be calculated as follows: i. Calculate the maximum number of units allowed by the base density; ii. Calculate the maximum number of units that may be allocated from the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design; iii. Add the figures determined in i. and ii. to determine the total number of units allowed for the site; iv. Divide the total number of units allowed, as calculated in iii., by the total land area to determine the resulting units per acre for the project site; v. Determine the total floor area of all interior accessory uses exceeding 5% of the gross floor area of the proposed building; vi. Subtract the figure determined in v. from the total land area, and divide this difference by 43,560 to determine the net acreage; vii. Multiply the net acreage derived in vi. by the applicable resulting units per acre figure determined in iv. The resulting product is the maximum number of rooms allowable for the project. viii. The final allocation of rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve shall be determined by multiplying the net acreage determined in vi. by the base density and subtracting this product from the maximum number of rooms allowable for the project as determined in vii. Response No. 16: See attached Building Area/Accessory Uses Summary Chart. Accessory uses are less than 10 percent of the gross floor area. Comment No. 17: Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That application fora building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than xx, 2011, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407. Response No. 17: Acknowledged. 10 Comment No. 18: Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2009-00002). Response No. 18: Acknowledged. Comment No. 19: Sheet C1.1 -Site data - Include a front (east) setback to the dropoff canopy (appears to be 9.6 at the NE corner, but appears to be 9.3 feet at the SE corner. Response No. 19: NES -Site data table revised to include canopy setback of 9.3'. Comment No. 20: Exhibit B -Granting of Hotel Density Reserve Units #4 - Response should rather discuss how the Mixed Use calculation has lessed out the retail and restaurant square footage in order to calculate the number of hotel rooms permissible, as these are primary uses, which is in compliance with intensity regulations. The square footage of the retail and restaurant is not consistent with that indicated on Sheet C1.1. The response should also state that the accessory uses of meeting rooms of 4,520 square feet and an exercise room of 670 square feet are consistent with amid-priced hotel. Response No. 20: Please see revised Exhibit "B." Comment No. 21: 9/20/09-WW Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report: 8/7109-WW Per CDC Section 3-911, must underground the existing overhead utilities along the east side of Hamden Drive for the site frontage. Response No. 21: Acknowledged. 11 Comment No. 22: Civil Sheets C1.1 and C3.1 and architectural Sheets A.1 and A.2 are inconsistent regarding depicting the number of parking spaces in rows and in the total number of parking spaces attributable to Hotels A and B. Civil plans show/indicate a total of 301 spaces, whereas the architectural phans show/indicate a total of 302 spaces. Revise to show the parking spaces in a row consistently between plans and the number of spaces in each row, as well as the parking counts for each floor and the total number for each hotel. Ensure all written material in the application exhibits and the Parking Demand Study are correct. Response No. 22: NES -Please see revised documentation from Civil, Architect and Traffic Engineer, all information is now consistent. Comment No. 23: Sheets C3.1, C3.2, C4.1, C5.1 and L.1 -Verbiage for the turn around areas for Hotels A and B are illegible. Can you make it readable? Response No. 23: NES -Please see revised plans. Comment No. 24: Exhibit B -Description of Request -Revise the Request for the following: Provide Front (east) setback from Hamden to the dropoff canopy (either 9.6 or 9.3 feet -see Sheet C3.1). Response No. 24: See revised Exhibit "B" and revised Sheet C.3.1. Comment No. 25: 9/19/09 - WW Provide Shared Parking table on Sheet C1.1. 8/28/09-WW Sheet C1.1 -Need to provide a Shared Parking calculation table for combined Hotels A and B, per Section 3-1405. For calculation purposes, need to use the high numbers for Retail and Restaurant. Table will need to look like the table in Section 3-1405, but with the actual required number of parking spaces based on the number of required spaces for Hotel, Retail (high number) and Restaurant (high number). The highest number of spaces required, based on the Shared Parking calculation, should be 377 spaces for the Weekday, 6 pm to midnight column. Based on this Shared Parking calculation producing a total required parking for Hotels A and B of 377 spaces, and since provided parking is only 324 spaces (based on the architectural plans), a Parking Reduction Study is required (see comments on Parking Study). 12 Response No. 25 See Page 1 of the revised Parking Study. The Shared Parking calculation is 376 spaces. NES -Please see revised Sheet C1.1 with revised parking information as per your request. Comment No. 26: Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 -Parking -Ensure the proper total number of parking spaces is included in this response (may not be 301 spaces). See other Planning comments. Response No. 26: Please see revised Exhibit "B." There are a total of 302 proposed parking spaces. Comment No. 27: 9/21/09 & 8/31109 - WW In accordance with the Development Agreement (see Planning comments for the DVA), "no more than 25% of overnight accommodation units shall have full kitchens. Such kitchens shall be limited to those units identified on the plans in Exhibit "B" as "suites" and shall not be located in any unit received from the Hotel Density Reserve." Indicate on the floor plans the units that will have full kitchens as "suites". Response No. 27: The rooms in Hotel A are not proposed to have kitchens. The project is not using density from the Destination Resort pool and this restriction is not applicable. Comment No. 28: Sheet C1.1 -Parking for Hotel A -Revise the Site Data for the followings: a. Parking Proposed should be 182 (?) spaces, based on the architectural plans (civil and architectural plans need to be coordinated); b. Parking Required should be "Per Shared Parking Calculation"; c. Parking Calculations -Hotel parking rate should be 1.2 spaces per room, with a required parking of 170 spaces (170.4 goes down to a70); All of the above needs to take into account all other DRC comments as to how proposed parking is modified. Include the Shared Parking calculation table on Sheet C1.1. Response No. 28: NES -Please see revised C1.1 with information as per your request. 13 Comment No. 29: 9/21/09 & 8/6/09 - WW Show or indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. Response No. 29: Acknowledged. All lighting fixtures shall be building mounted or installed in such a manner as to minimize or eliminate light spillage on to adjacent properties. Comment No. 30: 9/20/09-VWH Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 8/7/09 - WW Lot lines are proposed to be modified/relocated from that as platted (main hotel areas for Hotels A and B between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive), as well as possibly for the waterfront lots on the east side of Hamden Drive. As such, a Minor Lot Adjustment will be required to be approved prior to the submission of any building permits. Additionally, since Declaration of Unity of Titles have been recorded tying waterfront lots to the main lots between Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive, a Release of Unity of Title(s) will also be approved prior to the submission of any permits. The Staff Report will include an appropriate condition of approval for such. Response No. 30: Acknowledged. Comment No. 31: 9/21/09-VW1l Proposal is still unclear about intermingling or co-mingling of design elements: a. Unclear why the City should support Hotel A with the driveway on Coronado Drive to a deadend parking area that doesn't interconnect to the other parking and ramping facilities; b. Unclear how Hotel A provides for trash disposal (where the compactor dumpster is located on Hotel B with pickup on Hamden Drive). There will still need to have cross easements for parking, drainage, fire systems, maintenance, etc. recorded prior to the issuance of a C.O. 8/3109-VWU The design of these two hotels are intermingled with parking and support facilities, such that it appears that one hotel cannot be constructed independent of the other hotel, or at least the first 3-4 floors. The written material needs to address this 14 interdependence and how such will be constructed and operated. Examples are, but are not limited to: a. Hotel B is dependent upon Hotel A for the driveway to Hamden and the ramps to Levels 2 & 3 parking; b. Hotel A is dependent upon Hotel B for the driveway to Coronado Drive; c. Hotels A and B are interdependent on the number of parking spaces (?) between the two hotels; d. Hotel A is dependent upon Hotel B for trash disposal (see Solid Waste comments) for pickup on Hamden Drive; e. There are pools on Level 4 for both Hotels A and B, however, only Hotel B is shown to have a pool mechanical room (unclear if this single pool equipment room has equipment for both pools or only for Hotel B); and f. Storage and equipment rooms on Levels 2 & 3 are only shown for Hotel B (there are no similar storage and equipment rooms shown for Hotel A, such as for fire command, fire pump and generator). Provide such discussion in the written material and there will need to be some type of condition of approval in the Staff Report requiring the submission of a certain portion of the other hotel to be submitted for construction at the same time as the construction of the other hotel and for agreements or easements for cross access, fire sprinklers (?), trash, etc. Response No. 31: a. Acknowledged. Parking areas shall be connected at ground level to provide two means of egress from building A. b. Acknowledged. A CMU, stuccoed temporary trash enclosure shall be installed on site B until the common trash room in building B is built. Such cross easements shall be recorded prior to C.O. We suggest a condition of approval for Hotel B requiring the following before issuing a C.O. for Hotel B: (i) a C.O. be issued on Hotel A and (ii) recording of cross easements between Hotel A property and Hotel B property. Hotel A is self-sufficient with the exception of the trash enclosure described above. We suggest a condition of approval for Hotel A requiring an easement for the trash enclosure prior to C.O. Comment No. 32: Sheets C3.1, C3.2, C4.2, C5.1, L1.1 and Al -Parking row numbers need to reflect those spaces being attributed to Hotel A and to Hotel B. There are discrepancies in the number of spaces between civil and architectural plans 15 and the double doors to the trash room for Hotel A. Revise. Response No. 32: Acknowledged. See Sheets Al & A2. NES -Please see revised parking space counts which reflect the spaces attributed to each hotel. The discrepancies between civil and architectural plans have been resolved. Comment No. 33: 9/20/09-VWN Show on the east elevation for Building A (Sheet A3) and the south elevation for Building A (Sheet A4) the stair tower that goes to the roof. Provide dimensions from the flat roof to the top of this stair tower (cannot exceed 16 feet). 8/30/09-VWU It is assumed that all a/c equipment will be on the roof (f not, need to indicate where such will be located). It may be helpful to provide a rooftop plan. How will repair technicians access the roof for mechanical maintenance of such equipment? How will any rooftop mechanical equipment be screened to meet the Code requirement of Sections 3-201.D and 3-903.H? If such mechanical equipment extends above the parapets, how will such screening be accomplished or will location on the roof be such that views will not be possible? Response No. 33: Acknowledged. See Sheets A3 & A4. Comment No. 34: Parking Study by Robert Pergolizzi - Revise for the following: . a. Introduction, Paragraph 1, Line 10 -Revise from 42 to 41 for the restaurant (to be consistent with calculation on Sheet C1.1); b. Introductions, Paragraph 2, Line 1 - It appears the total number of spaces will not be 301. Revise to the proper number of spaces. c. Parking supply, Line 1 - it appears the total number of spaces will not be 301. Revise to the proper number of spaces; and d. Conclusion, Line 6 - It appears the total number of spaces will not be 301. Revise to the property number of spaces. Response No. 34: a. See the revised Parking Reduction Study, dated October, 2009. b., c. & d.The study was revised to indicate 302 parking spaces. 16 Comment No. 35: Sheet C2.2 -Mixed Use Calculation table -Information is fuzzy and unreadable in areas (letters are dotted, not full letters). Replace this table with the table being provided to you (attached to email with Draft DRC comments). Response No. 35: NES -Please see revised C1.1 for the Mixed Use Calculation Table as per your direction. Comment No. 36: Sheet C1.1 -Proposed Parking & Room Table -Revise for Hotel A: Parking for ground floor from 29 to 30 spaces (need to be consistent with other Planning comments to accurately depict the correct number of spaces). Response No. 36: NES -Please see revised table on Sheet C1.1. Comment No. 37: 9/20/09-VWN Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 8/30109-VW11 There are blind spots for motorists traveling the garage and backing out of spaces. Need to address how conflicts will be addressed to aid motorists, such as mirrors, and show such on the plans. Locations include, but may not be limited to, the following: a. Level 1 -Potentially on both sides at the ramp for motorists on the ramp, for motorists crossing in front of the ramp and at the drop-off zone; b. Level 1 - At the driveway to Coronado Drive for motorists entering and for motorists backing out of the westernmost parking spaces; c. Levels 2 & 3 -Both sides of the stairwell on the west side; d. Levels 2 & 3 -Both sides of the stairwell and elevators on the north side; and e. Levels 2 & 3 -Potentially on both sides at the ramp for motorists on the ramp and for motorists crossing in front of the ramp. Response No. 37: Acknowledged. See Civil sheets. NES -Please see Civil sheet C3.2 Sight Triangle and Safety Traffic Plan for added safety features as per your direction; any additional features required will be provided prior to issuance of permit as per condition of approval. Comment No. 38: 9/19/09 & 817/09 - WW Sheet A2 - Plans indicate balconies in may locations as being continuous between multiple rooms, yet the elevations on Sheets A3 and A4 do 17 not show them as continuous between multiple rooms (shown as individual balconies) or balconies are not shown at all. Which is correct? Floor plans and elevations should be consistent. For balconies that are continuous between multiple rooms, how will they be separated between rooms and how will that look on the elevations? Response No. 38: Acknowledged. Drawings refined and coordinated. See Architectural sheets. Comment No. 39: 9/21/09-WW The architect has provided calculations and percentages on Sheets A5 & A6 (not Sheet 12). However, the following does not comply with the provision below. Revise the elevations to comply with the provision and revise the calculations: a. Hotel A -North - 57% b. Hotel A -West - 57% c. Hotel B -North -Provide calculations and percentages based on Levels 4-8 (not 0%); d. Hotel B -West - 54%; and e. Hotel B -South - 58%. Written material in Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project #6b indicates at least 60% is provided (not correct). Need to expound on HOW this proposal complies with this provision. 8/31/09-WW Show compliance with Section C.3 of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design: "At least sixty percent (60%) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. For the purpose of this standard, an elevation is that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development." Provide the percentages on the elevations on Sheets A3 and A4 and a discussion of such under Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6b Response No. 39: Acknowledged. Building elevations have been revised to achieve the minimum 60% requirement. See Sheet A5 and revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 40: Unclear why on Sheet C2.1 the five existing parallel parking spaces and meters are being removed and then five new parallel parking spaces and meters are being proposed on Sheet C3.1. Parallel spaces appear to be in the same 18 location. Unclear how many spaces are being lost to the driveway on Coronado Drive. Revise/advise. Response No. 40: NES -Additional notes were added to Sheet C2.1 to provide additional clarification; the same number of spaces will be provided, spaces will be begin closer to 3~d Street where an old driveway apron will be removed. Comment No. 41: Reduced scale (8.5"x11") landscape plan Sheet L1.1 - Suggest black and white rather than colored, as the colors do not read. Response No. 41: Acknowledged. Comment No. 42: 9119109 & 8130/09 - WW Sheets A3 & A4 -Black and white elevations need to provide the following: a. Hotels A & B -Exterior wall, roof and awning materials; b. Hotels A & B -Exterior colors indicated, such as through a legend (Color 1, Color 2, etc.); c. Hotels A & B -Dimension to midpoint of architectural embellishments unnecessary (remove); d. Hotels A & B - Provide a dimension from top of flat roof to top of architectural embellishments; e. Hotels A & B -Assumed that no stairwell or elevator overrun extends above the flat roof (??). If there is such, need to show; f. Need to indicate garage openings (typical); g. East elevation of Hotel B on A3 - Is there a parapet missing from either side of the center vertical wall architectural embellishment (above the drop-off zone)? and h. East elevation of Hotel B on A3 -Show the roll-up door for the trash room. Response No. 42: Acknowledged. See Sheets A3 & A4. Comment No. 43: 9/21/09-WW May need to include a condition of approval in the Staff Report to address such prior to issuance of the building permit. 8130109-WW Will the parking garage have to be mechanically ventilated? If so, need to show such ventilation on the elevation drawings. Response No. 43: Acknowledged. The parking garages are designed as an "open" parking structure and do not need mechanical ventilation. 19 Comment No. 44: Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB. Response No. 44: Acknowledged. Comment No. 45: Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building and be a maximum height of four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Response No. 45: Acknowledged. Comment No. 46: Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: The books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representative of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law. Response No. 46: Acknowledged. Comment No. 47: Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Response No. 47: Acknowledged. Comment No. 48: Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Response No. 48: Acknowledged. Comment No. 49: Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That prior to issuance of any permit, all requirement of General Engineering, storm water Engineering, Traffic Engineering and the Fire Department are addressed. Response No. 49: Acknowledged. Comment No. 50: Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a hurricane evacuation plan for the hotel and accessory 20 docks be submitted and approved by the City for all guests of the hotel. Response No.50: The proposed development agreement includes a provision requiring the hurricane evacuation plan. It is not necessary to add this as a condition of approval of the development order. Comment No. 51: Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant pay the City for any lost parking on Coronado Drive due to the proposed driveway for this project. Response No. 51: Acknowledged. Comment No. 52: Colored Sheet A3 -Area for the compactor dumpster is different than the black and white version of Sheet A3. Revise to be consistent. Response No. 52: See revised architectural plans. OTHER: No Comments 10/16/2009 10:39 AM 50593.117498 #503900 v1 - DiGiovanni/Hotel A/Resp. to 10/1 DRC 21 Tropicanna Resort Motels Building Area /Accessory Uses Comparison Accessory Area Ratios for Tropicana Hotel Ground Floor Parking L2 Parking L3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8 Total Accessory Percentage. Building A Hotel 7,354 449 549 14,869 14,869 14,869 14,869 14,869 82,697 Accessory Uses 4,520 1,060 5,580 6.7% Building B Hotel 7,220 3,530 3,973 16,239 16,239 16,239 16,239 79,679 Accessory Uses 1,335 670 2,005 2.5% 10/15/2009 ~. Clearwater Fire & Rescue • 0 610 Franklin Street- Clearwater, Florida 33756 `'""''~~~`r~ Public Works Administration -Engineering Department ~ 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 - Cleawater, Florida 33756 FIRE FLOW & HYDRANT WORKSHEET (Revised 03/29/2006) This worksheet is required to be submitted to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to DRC meeting for any project that is more than 3 stories or more than 30 feet in height above the lowest Fire Dept vehicle access point or for any other project that will require an Automatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Fre Pump before any permitsfor new building construction, building expansion or fire hydrants will be issued by the City of Clearwater. Information and design must comply with Rorida Building Code, Chapter 9 -Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire Prevention Code to indude applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13, 13D, 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20, 291 and 1142 Annex H) and AWWA M-17 -Installation, Field Testing and Maintenance of Fre Hydrants. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Tropicana Resort Hotels - Hotel Building "A" Project Address: Coronado Ave. & 3rd Street, Clearwater Beach, FL GENERAL WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION Location of Nearest Fire Hydrant Coronado Drive & 3rd Street Hydrant#: 32 Size ofWaterMain Supplying Fre Flow: 6" Static: 74 psi Residual: 56 Looped System or Dead End WaterMain? psi PItOt: 4 ~ pSl FIOW: Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the laser. Horizontal Hydrant Test Conducted by: City of Clearwater (Include/Attach Copy of Actual Test Sheet) NFPA HAZARDCLASSIFICATION Area # 1-Parking Garage 2-Retail 3-Restaurant 4-Hotel Looped 1160 gprn 100 Ft. Vertical Elevation 2 Ft. Classification Ordinary, Grp.l Light Licht Licht Description of Hazard Protected (Commodity Description, Storage Height andArrangement, ifapplicab/e): N/A N/A N/A N/A AttachAdditiorral SheetsifNecessary DESIGN PARAMETERS Area # System Type Area (sq. ft.) Density (gpm'ft) Inside Hose (gpm) Outside Hose (gpm) 1 Wet Pipe 1,500 0.15 100 250 2 Wet Pipe 1,500 G.iO 100 100 3 Wet Pipe 1,500 0.10 100 ~ 100 4 Wet Pipe 1,500 0.10 100 100 Standpipes (3 Stair to wers; 500 c~n^~~ for ,_st stair plus 250 gnrn. each additional) Attach Additions/ Sheets if Necessary Total Needed Fre Flow (N. F. F.) 1000 gpm (Standpipes) Is Existing System Supply Suffident to Meet N. F.F. Above? No x Yes CODES A ND STA NDA RDS System Component Applicable NFPA Standard /Year Edition and OtherApplicable Codes or Statutes Wet Pipe Spklr. System NFPA 13 / 2002 Class 1 Standpipe NFPA 14 / 2003 Fire Service Main NFPA 24 / 2002 Fire Pump NFPA 20 / 2003 AttachAddi6onat Sheetsi/Necessary If Project Indudes Fire Pump, Supply the Following: Fire Pump Information: Pump Capacty: 100o gpm Chum Pressure: Rated Pressure: 150 psi Pressure @ 150% Flow: On~ite Storage Tank Capacity (?): N/A 18 0 psi 97.5 p~ PREPARER/ SPECIFlERINFORMATION PreparerName: Joseph H. Griner, III Company Name: Griner Engineering, Inc . Mailing Address: 1628 First Avenue North City: St . Petersburg State: Florida Zip; 33713 Phone: 727-822-2335 Fax: 727-821-3361 Pzg e 2 c` ., FLURIUA P F: °. E. Sea/ ~r^<3~k~s ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED Fire Pre~ntion Items to be Addressed Prior to DRC Approval: 1. Provide Fire Flow Ca~ulations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water suppy is available and to determine ~ any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact d this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs d any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/orfire pump. If a fire pump is required, the water suppy must be able to suppy 150% of ~s rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, NFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and NFPA 1142 (Anne~c H) 's required. 2. When an FDC 's required, t shall be a m inmum d 15 feetf rom building and shall hav e a fire by drarQ within 40 feet This hydrant shall not be located on the same main as the Fire Sprirkler and must be on the suppy side d a double detector check valve. This hydrant is in add~ion to the hydrant that 's required for firefighting purposes that is to be within 300 feet d building, as the hose lays, and on the same side of the street as the proj~t 3. Provide and show on the plan a minimum 30-fod turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at all entrances and exits. 4. Provide and show on the she plan 24 feet d width at driveway s /drive aisles for emergency vehble ingress and egress forfront and rear parking Ids. Where driveways are split by an island with one-way traffic, each side d the 'stand shall praideand show on the site plan 20feet d width at the driveways on each side d the island 5. Provide a Fire Department access roadway (with turn-around, Y, T or cut-de-sac) in accordance with NFPA 1. A Fire Departrnent access roadway must have 24~oot clear width and 14~oot vertical clearance, and be capable d supporting the weight d Fire Department vehicles (80,000Ibs~ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 rtOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) HOri~, A - 300 HANIDEN FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Project ' (Revised 07/11/2Q08) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 72T-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: 5200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AIVD AGENT INFORMATION; (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLIGANTNAME• Tropicana Resort Motels, L.L.C., a Fla. limited liability company MAILING ADDRESS: 2245•N:orth McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, FL 33759 PHONE NUMBER: 727-797-8972 FAX NUMBER: 727-797-8928 CELL NUMBER EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Johnson; "`Do`pe; bBolco~, Ll~i#ppe~ ~`l~urns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 727-461-1818 FAX NUMBER: 727-462-0365 _ EMAIL: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Tropicana~Resort Motels, L.L:C. PROJECT NAME: Hotel A • PROJECT VALUATION: $ 9 , 000 , 000 STREET ADDRESS See Exhibit "A" attached for street address, parcel numbers and PARCEL NUMBER(S): legal description. PARCEL SIZE (acres): 1.106 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 48 , 190.53 sq . f t . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" attached. PROPOSED USE(S): 142 overnight accommodation units, 2, 750 sq , ft . restaurant and . 3,900 sq. ft. retail DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Exhibit "B't attached. Speaficalljr identify the request (indude number of units or square - footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of - parking spaces, speafic use, etcJ C:1Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RI~HTS (fDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SfTE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see Page ~ D. ^ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. coo F..1,;1,it "B" attached for responses to General Applicability Criteria 1 through 6. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vidnity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, inducting visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacentproperties. C:1Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) O Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractigl without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to .Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Cr teria t roug 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district •3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not softer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially after the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flebbility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking an: justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectirves: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ ~ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive. roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. C:\Documents and Settingsklerek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 21108 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL Manual and 4202.A.21j (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria ^ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; O Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond alt property lines; ^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ^ All adjacent streets and munidpal storm systems; ^ .Proposed stomtwater detention/retention area including top of bank, tce of slope and outlet control structure; ^ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ^ Proposed stormwater detentioNretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ A OWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must inttial one of the following): ~~ X Stonnwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. 0 you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the Ciiy Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by spedes, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisY, of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees, ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall lie approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering prindples. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:1Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infili Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-2O2.A) ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24' x 367: Index sheet referendng individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Atl dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and spedmen trees, inducting description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of--way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, inducting fire hydrants, storm. and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water tines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of ail required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(~ and Index #701 }; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsfte storm-water management fadlities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Loption of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typipls of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level-Two approval: ^ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabular forth: Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; , Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, inducting all paved parking spaces 8 driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Offical records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; Building and stTUdure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (LS.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED D REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stortnwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot tines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktop~planning dept forms 0708~Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc -Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL. REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36'x: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas inducting swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas inducting landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by spades, size and locations, inducting driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, spedfications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, inducting botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants inducting instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous. development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/s X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landsppe assodated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) Materials ^ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 % X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached- signs; Provide details inducting location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall indude the street adctress (numerals) . ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/~ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:~Documents and Setfingsklerek.ferguson\Desktop~planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 IC. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4202A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Incude ff required by the Traffic Operations Manager or hish-er designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehide directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or-more new vehice trips per day. ^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable acddents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (RE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a `Scoping Meeting' held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Departments Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Adknowiedgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): X Traffic ImpaG Study is inducted. The study must indude a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all ~_!~ roadway legs and each fuming movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Fiow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water suppy is available and to determine ff any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply- must be able to supply 150°~ of its rated capadty. Compliance with the 20 F 'da Fire Prevention Code to indude NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. nowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): X Fire Flow Calculations/VllaterSfudy is inducted. Fire Flow Calculaflons/Water Study is not required.: CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FORA FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit-and photograph the property described in this application. E SigpaturQ of ps t r8ngneC gr~epresentative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PIN~I,I'A~S Swom to and subscribed before me thi~sLL~~lr^-day of JuIY , A.D. 20 ~-to me and/or by E . D . Armstrong ~~ ,who is personally known I tQmffi~rm4rxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx7cSr}Q{ ~n/~~ ~ SkrLi„irr~ Q My commission expires: :~ ~ ~ Commission # MMdNr Troy Fgfn • IMwenp~, Me. lt0031S70r9 C:WocumeMs and Settings\derek.ferguson~Desktoplplanning dept fortes 07081Comprehensive InfilFProjeG (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: AGOSTINO Di~IOVANNI, JOHN CONTI and FRANCESCO GPRRIERA, 00-TRUSTEES OF ~ 2. That (i am/we are) the owners and record title holders of the following described property (address or general location): Parcel Nos. 08/~~I15/17604/000~0010 08/29/15/17604/000/0020 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible development application for ccmlj?rehensive infill redevelopment project 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: E. D. ARMSTRONG III, ESQUIRE and JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BUNS, LLP, 9ll Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That e), ih under 'gned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ~- r ~ , GO ' iGI~T~ww`; ne~0- UST~'~ JOi~? NTI , P('~eT~tUSTEE~ ^ ^1^^^^^^• ^^N^^^. • ^ O1ryrgr~ fiRUSTEE~~ Property Owner ~a1~ Expires?118/201~ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS '~.;~1'oFPQ~a FI-r;~s No1arYAssn., krc p wuuuun^.^^nau^^a-annnununnn^w Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida,.on this ~ day of July 2009 Agostino DiGiovarmi, John ~iti ~d ll d _ persona y appeare r,~~_ ~y~ w avrn~ een first duly sworn Fr-anees"" ,--£o-~'usgees Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. '^'OF TIIF TROPICANA RESORT I1~ND TRUST Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: O`r; - / ~ -- l ~ C:1Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktOpiplanning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 (Hotel A) Parcel No. Street Address Portion of 08/29/15/17604/000/0020 316 Hamden Drive 08/29/15/17604/000/0010 309 Coronado Drive 08/29/15/17586/001/0010 301 Coronado Drive 08/29/15/17586/001/0040 315 Coronado Drive EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 HOTEL "A" Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block A, COLUMBIA SUB. NO. 2, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 79, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. TOGETHER WITH A part of Lots 1 and 2, COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 3, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page 46, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1 for a Point of Beginning; thence Southerly along the Easterly boundary of said Lot 1, said line also being the Westerly right-of--way line of Hamden Drive (Hamilton Drive per plat), 167.41 feet along the Arc of a curve concave to the West having a Radius of 6507.52 feet, Chord Bearing and Length being S 06°45'36" W, 167.41 feet; thence N 83°02'46" W, 99.73 feet; thence S 06°57' 14" W, 61.00 feet; thence S 09°04'50" W, 23.34 feet; thence N 81°44'25" W, 10.77 feet to a point on the Westerly boundary of aforesaid Lot 2, said point also being the Southeast corner of Lot 4 of the aforementioned COLUMBIA SUB. NO. 2; thence Northerly along the Westerly boundary of aforesaid Lots 2 and 1, 248.79 feet along the Arc of a curve concave to the West having a Radius of 6397.52 feet, Chord Bearing and Length being N 07°08'39" E, 248.77 feet to the Northwest corner of aforesaid Lot 1, thence S 84°27'30" E, along the North boundary of said Lot 1, said line also being the South right-of--way line of Third Street, 110.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. AND ALSO TOGETHER WITH Lot lA, Less the Southerly 8.60 feet thereof, COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION NO. 3, as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page 46, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. The parcel contains 48,190.53 square feet or 1.106 acres, more or less. EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Tropicana Resort Motels, L.L.C. 300 Hamden Drive -Hotel A Section B. Description of Request Request The Applicant, Tropicana Resort Motels, L.L.C., proposes to redevelop the property with a 142-unit hotel, including 95 units from the Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve, with 3,900 square feet of retail area and a 2,750 square foot restaurant. The subject property is an aggregate of 1.106 acres comprised of several lots bounded on the north by Third Street, on the west by Coronado Drive and on the east by Hamden Drive. Specifically, the Applicant requests flexible development approval to permit (i) 142 overnight accommodation units (ii) 3,900 square feet of retail use; and (iii) 2,750 square feet of restaurant use in the Tourist (T) District, which includes an increase in density of 95 overnight accommodation units from the Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve, with a. a Lot Area of 48,190.53 square feet; b. a .Lot Width of 243.68 feet on Coronado Drive, 220 feet on Third Street and 167 feet on Hamden Drive; c. a maximum height (above BFE) of 74' to roof deck and 82' to top of architectural embellishments; d. a front (west) setback along Coronado Drive of 16.0' to building and 5.4' to patio; e. a front (north) setback along Third Street of 11.8' to building and 5' to patio; f. a front (east) setback along Hamden Drive of 10.4' to building, 9.3' to drop-off canopy and 13.8' to drop-off zone; g. aside (south) setback (adjoining parking garage) of 0' to building and 0' to pavement; h. aside (east) interior setback (adjoining parking garage) of 0' to building and 0' to pavement; i. aside (south) setback (adjoining Lot 5, Block A, Columbia Sub No. 2) of 21' to building; j. Flexibility to minimum standards for sight visibility triangles on Hamden Drive and Coronado Drive; k. 182 parking spaces; Direct access to an arterial street; and m. Approval of a two-year development order; as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C of the Code. Simultaneously with this request, the applicant has submitted (i) a Development Agreement application seeking approval of a proposed Development Agreement setting forth the terms of the project's use of 95 rooms from the Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve; and (ii) a flexible development application for a comprehensive infill redevelopment project and development agreement application seeking approval of a 118-unit extended stay hotel ("Hotel B") which is proposed to be located adjacent to the southerly boundary of the subject property and to share a parking garage with the proposed project, as shown on the site plan. Hotel A and Hotel B share certain support facilities which are located on the Hotel A property, including: (i) driveway to Hamden Drive; (ii) ramps to Levels 2 and 3 parking; and (iii) access to Hotel B parking. Hotel A is self-sufficient without the construction of Hotel B, other than the shared trash collection area which is proposed on the Hotel B site. This could be addressed by a condition of approval that an easement providing for a temporary trash collection area on the Hotel B property must be recorded prior to a certificate of occupancy being issued to Hotel A. History The property is the site of the Sandman Motel (66 units of overnight accommodations) at 300 Hamden and the Alex Family Restaurant, a 138-seat restaurant at 305 Coronado, as well as adjoining residential and accessory structures. The subject property and the parcel on which Hotel B is proposed are under the same ownership control. The applicant proposes to demolish all existing structures on the site. The property is located within the area designated by Beach by Design as the "Small Motel District." Proposed Use The proposed 142-unit hotel will be amid-priced hotel operated by a nationally known chain and will include meeting rooms and a pool. At this time, the Applicant cannot disclose the hotel flag as negotiations are not completed; however, the term "mid- 2 priced" is intended to indicate that this will be a reasonably priced hotel for a family beach vacation-one with a more affordable pricing than a resort hotel such as the Sandpearl or the Hyatt. The proposed 3,900 square feet of retail space and 2,750 square foot restaurant will be located on the ground floor facing Coronado Drive and easily accessible to pedestrians. Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. _ The subject property includes small "water lots" on the easterly side of Hamden which provide docks that will serve the property, so the easterly frontage is open to the water. The bulk, coverage and density of other properties in the neighborhood located to the west, north and south are varied. The new Hyatt Aqualea at 150' in height and with minimal setbacks is located across Coronado Drive immediately west of the subject property. North of the Aqualea and northwest of the subject property is the site of the proposed 450-unit hotel at 100 Coronado (Kiran Patel project), which is approved at 150' in height, and is currently a parking lot. South of the Aqualea, are Britt's restaurant and shops (two stories) and the Beachview Inn (4 stories), both of which are significantly set back from Coronado. Immediately north of the subject property across Third Street is the Sunrise Motel, an older two-story motel. The southerly portion of the same block on which the subject property is located is a mixture of older motels, efficiencies, retail and office uses, none of which exceed two stories. Amid these varying uses and sizes, the proposed 7-story Hotel A and 8-story Hotel B will be an appropriate transition stepping down toward Hamden and the water from the 150' high Hyatt Aqualea on Coronado. Both of the proposed hotels will have adequate setbacks from the rights-of-way, some greater than other existing buildings in the neighborhood. The closest residential area to the site is located on Devon Drive, which is to the northwest, approximately one block north off Hamden. Devon Drive is a residential street which is occupied by various size and age one and two-story homes. Devon is a finger which runs perpendicular to Hamden and as such, all residences on the north side of Devon enjoy a northerly waterfront view and view of the causeway and will not view the proposed project. From the residences on the south side of Devon Drive, the proposed hotel will be viewed across the waterway, which will lessen the impact, as will the tiered effect when viewing the proposed 82' hotel with the 150' Hyatt Aqualea in the background. 3 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed project will enhance this area of the beach in a number of ways, including: (1) Family-affordable hotel accommodations on Clearwater Beach, which include adequate parking, will meet a current need of the City. (2) Updated architectural design and landscaping will significantly enhance this block between Coronado and Hamden, which currently has no newly renovated structures and very little landscaping on the entire block. (3) New construction will meet current building codes. (4) The property value will significantly increase. (5) A nationally-recognized hotel chain will attract guests who become clientele for Beach restaurants, concessions and retail businesses. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. With regard to health, safety and welfare, the proposed development and structure will comply as required with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. The provision of adequate parking for the entire project on the site, including adequate stacking space and loading area, will eliminate possible traffic congestion at the site and eliminate potential off-site parking in public lots. The parking is designed to accommodate guests and employees, as well as provide adequate space for taxis and airport shuttles. Street level retail and restaurant, as well as new sidewalk installation and an appropriately buffered trash collection area will improve current conditions and pedestrian flow on the easterly side of Coronado. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. A traffic impact study prepared by Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. ("Traffic Study") is included in this submittal. The Traffic Study confirms that acceptable levels of service will be maintained on all adjacent roadways and at nearby intersections. The Applicant proposes a parking garage which will be shared with Hotel B and will contain a total of 302 parking spaces. A Parking Reduction Study prepared by Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. ("Parking Reduction Study") is included in this submittal. The Parking Reduction Study justifies a reduction from the code required 376 spaces (combined with Hotel B) and concludes that the proposed 302 parking spaces will easily accommodate the needs of employees and guests of the proposed hotels at full occupancy. Adequate parking will insure that traffic 4 will flow smoothly at the entry portico on Hamden Drive and the secondary parking garage entrance/exit on Coronado. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed hotel project is an appropriate transition for this location, as the site is located amid the larger resort hotels to the west, marina area to the north, water to the east and smaller motels to the south. As the proposed project is intended to be a nationally known chain with mid- range prices it will meet the needs of the City to provide affordable family accommodations on the beach. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal of the property as viewed from the causeway and the roundabout entrance to the beach. The architectural style integrates a Mediterranean design which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this waterfront property. As previously discussed, adequate parking on the site will keep vehicles off of the street, which will minimize congestion and encourage pedestrian traffic to and from the proposed hotel to the beach, the Pier 60 district to the north and/or other retail uses to the south. The proposed trash collection area is screened at the grade level so as not to impact passersby. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The proposed deviations from Code, which are discussed in detail below, are necessary and minimal in order to redevelop the site with the Hotel Density Reserve units. Certain site deviations are necessary in order to accommodate the restoration of mid-priced hotel rooms as envisioned by Clearwater Ordinance No. 7925-08. The Applicant has designed the proposed redevelopment project to comply with Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent possible, including breaks in the facade with balconies, variations in color and Mediterranean details, as well as tropical landscape buffers on all street frontages. The proposed hotel redevelopment of this site meets the City's vision of adding mid-priced hotel rooms to Clearwater Beach. 5 Setbacks Although the property has three front setbacks, the project is designed to meet the 15' building setback on Coronado and provide a minimum of 10' building setbacks on both Third Street and Hamden Drive. The relief sought from setbacks is required to accommodate sidewalks and paved areas and a zero setback on the south in order to connect the project to Hotel B to allow a shared parking garage. A shared parking garage enables the applicant to provide a greater number of parking spaces than two garages, as fewer driveways and ramps are necessary. The shared parking also eliminates congestion with shared ingress/egress drives on Coronado and Hamden. Height The Tourist District allows a minimum standard height of 35' (approximately 3 stories). The proposed height of 82' to the top of architectural embellishments allows the building to be set back from the rights-of-way and the provision of landscaping creating a pedestrian friendly environment which does not currently exist at this location. The proposed project will have a base element of three stories which includes retail, restaurant, lobby and parking. An additional 4-story tower element will be above the base pedestal. The property to the west is the new Aqualea, which is 150' in height. The requested height of 74' to roof deck and 82' to top of architectural embellishment for enhanced parapets for visual interest is an appropriate step down as you move east across Coronado and as the beach skyline is viewed from the causeway and roundabout. Parking As previously discussed, the Parking Reduction Study confirms that the proposed. 302 parking spaces will ~ accommodate the needs of employees and guests of both hotels at full occupancy. Adequate parking will insure that traffic will flow smoothly at the entry portico on Hamden Drive and the secondary parking garage entrance/exit on Coronado. Sight Visibility Triangles As to the applicant's request for flexibility with regard to sight visibility triangles on Coronado and Hamden, the applicant proposes to install safety measures (such as mirrors and signage) to insure adequate visibility for the safety of motorists and pedestrians entering and exiting the garage. Two-Year Development Order The Applicant requests atwo-year development order due to market conditions. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, 6 intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. Overnight accommodations are allowed uses in the "Resort Facilities High" residential/overnight accommodation." in the "Tourist" zoning district. Primary land use category are "high density 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The improvement of the site may encourage renovation or redevelopment of some of the smaller sites on the block. The portion of the building adjoining the neighboring Lot 5, Block A of Columbia Sub. No. 2 is setback 21.5' and the entire setback area is landscaped. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. East. The easterly boundary of the property adjoins the water. West. The adjacent parcels located to the west of the property, across Coronado Drive are the existing Aqualea, which is 150' in height, and the proposed 450-unit hotel at 100 Coronado (Kiran Patel project), which is approved at 150' in height . These projects are already built or approved and will not be impeded by this application. The proposed 7-story and 8-story hotels will create an appropriate step down toward the water. North. The adjacent property to the north across Third Street is an area of older, smaller beach motels, which could be expected to undergo renovation or redevelopment in the future. The proposed building is set back 11.8' on Third Street and neighboring parcels to the north across Third Street will view a lushly landscaped setback area on all frontages -Coronado, Third Street and Hamden Drive. The proposed building has a minimum of 10' setback on all frontages. Northwest The closest residential area to the site is located on Devon Drive, which is to the northwest, approximately one block north off Hamden. Devon Drive is a residential street which is occupied by various size and age one and two-story homes. Devon is a finger which runs perpendicular to Hamden and as such, all residences on the north side of Devon enjoy a northerly waterfront view and view of the causeway and will not view the proposed project. From the residences on the south side of Devon Drive, the proposed hotel will be viewed across the waterway, which will lessen the impact, as will the tiered effect when viewing the proposed 82' hotel with the 150' Hyatt Aqualea in the background. 7 South. The more immediately adjacent sites are on the located on the south side of the subject property, which are a mixture of small motels, efficiencies, retail and office. A portion of the southerly boundary will be the proposed Hotel B which will adjoin and share a parking garage with the proposed project. The building has a 21' setback from the parcel to the south at Lot 5, Block A of Columbia Sub No. 2, which setback area will be entirely landscaped. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. Overnight accommodations are permitted by the "Resort Facilities High" land use category and in the "Tourist" zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard and flexible use. Adding mid-priced hotel accommodations to Clearwater Beach is a significant economic contributor to the City. New jobs will be generated by the proposed hotels. As previously discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding uses. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance. with all of the following design objectives: 8 a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. The proposed use as overnight accommodations are a use permitted in the Tourist zoning district without this approval. As previously discussed in detail in General Applicability Criteria 1, the proposed hotels will not impede the surrounding properties which are of varying size and use. The proposed project could stimulate additional tourist-related uses in this area which may encourage redevelopment of the remainder of this block. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. The proposed project is designed to meet the requirements of Beach by Design in scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. The architectural design is as prescribed by Beach by Design with breaks in the facade such as balconies and variations in color and Mediterranean details, including the roof, as well as tropical landscape buffers on all street frontages. Parking is internal to the project site to reduce noise transmission and visual distraction to adjacent properties. This project furthers the City's objective of revitalizing the beach and creating additional hotel rooms. The project has been designed such that the maximum dimension of uninterrupted building planes does not exceed 100 feet. Please refer to building elevations, schematic floor plans, and rendering. As shown on architectural plans, at least 60 percent of the building is covered with either architectural decoration (as described in 6.d.) or windows. The proposed 7-story hotel has an architectural delineation between the 3- story base element containing retail, restaurant, parking and amenities and the 4-story tower element containing the guest rooms, which gives the pedestal base a pedestrian scale. The proposed retail and restaurant uses at street level on Coronado, with meeting rooms and lobby on Third and Hamden, creates a horizontal mix of uses and will be inviting to pedestrians. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The emerging character of the area is that it is a transition between the new resort hotels existing and proposed between South Gulfview and Coronado and residential areas further to the south. In order to promote redevelopment with mid-priced hotels, it can be expected that there will 9 mixed neighborhoods where the older, smaller motels and businesses adjoin newer mid-priced hotels. Please see Comp. Inflll Criteria 4 for discussion of compatibility with the neighborhood. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. These elements are incorporated into the design as shown on building elevations. There are changes in the horizontal plane through alternating balconies and windows with alternating roof parapets and variations in color, all creating more of a townscape or .village appearance rather than appearing to be one building. Metal awnings on the ground floor retail and Spanish the on the roof add visual interest. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Landscaping Three sides of the project are building facades fronting on public-rights-of-way. The landscape plan is in accordance with design guidelines set forth in Beach by Design creating a pedestrian friendly environment with palm-lined sidewalks, beach (tropical) plantings and use of flowering plants. Royal palms line Coronado, coconut palms line Third Street and Sylvesters and Medjools line Hamden, providing a lush landscape that will benefit the surrounding hotels and residents. ******************** Granting of Hotel Density Reserve Units In connection with the Applicant's request for hotel density reserve units, the following indicate how the Applicant meets Beach by Design requirements for such additional units. 10 1. Those properties andlor developments that have acquired density from the Destination Resort Density Pool are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve. The subject property has not received units from the Destination Resort Density Pool, making this project eligible for units from the Hotel Density Reserve. 2. Those properties and/or developments that have had density transferred off to another property and/or development(s) through an approved Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) application by the City after December 31, 2007, are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve. There has been no transfer of density off of the subject property. 3. A maximum of 100 hotel rooms may be allocated from the Reserve to any development with a lot size of less than 2.5 acres. Those development with a lot size greater than or equal to 2.5 acres may use the Reserve to achieve a density of 90 hotel rooms per acre. However, in no instance shall the density of a parcel of land exceed 150 units per acre regardless of whether it has received benefit of transfers of development rights in addition to the Reserve, or not. The request for 95 rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve complies with this requirement. See the Mixed Use Calculation on Sheet C.1.1. 4. Accessory uses inconsistent with amenities typical of amid-priced hotel shall require compliance with the base FAR requirements of .the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use category. The accessory uses serving the hotel guests area 670 square foot pool and exercise room on Level 4 and 4,520 square feet of meeting rooms on ground level. The sizes of these accessory uses are consistent with amid-priced hotel and comprise less than 10 percent of the gross. floor area of the project. The 3,900 square feet of retail use and 2,750 square foot restaurant on the ground level are amenities which have been treated as primary uses in the density and parking calculations. 5. No hotel room allocated from the Reserve may be converted to a residential use (i.e. attached dwelling). Acknowledged. 11 6. The maximum building heights of the various character districts cannot be increased to accommodate hotel rooms allocated from the Reserve. The project is located in the Small Motel District which does not have a height limitation imposed. Please see the discussion of the proposed height in response to Comp. Infill Criteria 1. 7. A legally enforceable mandatory evacuation/closure covenant that the overnight accommodation use will be closed as soon as practicable after a hurricane watch that includes Clearwater Beach is posted by the National Hurricane Center. Acknowledged. Such covenant is included in the associated proposed Development Agreement. 8. Access to overnight accommodation units must be provided through a lobby and internal corridors. This requirement is met as shown on proposed architectural plans. 9. All hotel rooms obtained from the Reserve that are not constructed shall be returned to the Reserve. Acknowledged. Such covenant is included in the associated proposed Development Agreement. 10.The development shall comply with the MPO's countywide approach to the application of concurrency management for transportation facilities, and the transportation analysis conducted for the development shall include [criteria stated in Ordinance 7925-08]. As previously described, the Traffic Study is included with this submittal. 11.A reservation system shall be required as an integral part of the hotel use and there shall be a lobby/front desk area that must be operated as a typical lobby/front desk area for a hotel would be operated. Acknowledged. 12. The books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room shall be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with these regulations as allowed by general law. Acknowledged. 10/16/2009 11:09 AM 050593.117498 12 J I#: 2004470137 BK: 13977 PG: 909, 12/02/2004 at 05:35 PM, RECORDING 3 PAGES $27.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $24850.00 KARLEEN F. DE BEAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDM03 '~ ~ PREPARED BY AND RETUR27'TO~' ~U~~ Stephen O. Cole, Esgt~r2 ~ ~ Macfarlane Ferguson~~&'~McMullen ~. 625 Court Street, Sd~~ 200 Post Office Box k'6~~;-(`33757) Clearwater, Florda~3756 WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE made this ~ay of December 2004, between JEDE`:CORPORATION INC., a Florida corporation, of the County of Pinellas, and the State of Florida, Party of the First Part, whose m'~Tng address is 2919 West Bay Drive, Belleair Bluffs, Florida -.`..33.770, and JOHN CONTI, FRANCESCO CARRIERA and AGOSTINO DIGIOVANNI, -.~~.a-s• Co-Trustees of TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST, with full power and ,authority either to protect, conserve and to sell, lease, encumber, including all powers as setforth in F.S.689.071, or otherwise dispose of the real property described herein, Party of the Second Part, whose mailing address is ~~ 3 A-~S/ ~ b ~, G G ~~~. ~G 3 37 G 7. W I T N E S S E T H: That the said Party of the First Part, for and in consid- eration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to it in hand paid by the said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold, unto the said Party of the Second Part and its successors and assigns forever, all that certain parcel of land lying and being in the County of Pinellas, and State of Florida, more particularly described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. Subject to 2005 real estate taxes; and restrictions, reservations and easements of record. Parcel I.D. No. 08/29/15/17609/000/0010 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appur- tenances, with every privilege, right, title, interest and estate, -1- y PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 13977 PG 910 r__ dower and right'~.of dower, reversion, remainder and easement thereto belong?ng:'or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE+:~~AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And ~H~`Said Party of the First Part does covenant with the said Part}r.n;f the Second Part that it is lawfully seized of the said pemiSes, that it are free of all encumbrance, and that it has good;'right and lawful authority to sell the same; and that saicT~;garty of the First Part doth hereby fully warrant the title a~~...sad land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims .azf°all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Part has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above writ- ten. Signed, Sealed and Delivered ~ in Our Presence: JEDE CORPORATION, INC., a Florid corporation ,~ By: Q Pr'/N,~a-~me~~ nn~. w~ ,,,y, Deborah Well , as President Print Name ~ ~ Cie STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that before me personally appeared DEBORAH WELLS, as President of JEDE CORPORATION, INC., a Florida corporation, ~ to me personally known, [ ] or who has produced a current/valid driver's license as identification and who did take an oath, known to me to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and severally acknowledged the execution thereof to their free act and deed as such officers, for the uses and purposes therein expressed, and the said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. WITNESS my hand offi 1 seal at Clearwater, said County and State, this ~ day of a ~ 2004. Not r Publi Print Name: My Commission Expires: [SEAL ] ~,,,,,~ ~ Pw~ Rrvrnond y~ .,y cornmurm oo~aszas Aa~ ExPite61~W~N 10.2008 -2- PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 13977 PG 911 E:iIIIDIT ".. PARCEL 1: Lots 1 end LA, COLUHDiA SUDOIVi3ZON NO. 3, according to plat thsreo[ recorded in Plat Dook 27, page i6, Public Accords andpalsollaseothay~ Florida; LES $"t2Te, South 26.5 Leat of said Lot 1A, following described portion oC Lot 2: begin at a point in the West boundary o[°~s~_id Lot 1, which said point is locatod 21.87 tact North nlonq tha~s~•id,'lina from the Southwest corner of said Lot Lor a Point oC Beginning;.,`>nnd Lrom the Point of Daginninq thus established, run thence South n,'d,i~§[ance-oL :1.87 feet to the Bouthvast corner of said Lot 1; run t2leiSCg,,Easc clang the South boundary oL said Lot i, a distance oL 110 L~aet~,co tie southeast corner oL said Lot; run thence North along the Eas t`~boi2hdary oC said tot a distance of 26.5 feat; run thence West in a a r,n-:idtit''_ine to the established poinc of Beginning. )'AIiC~L 2 '~Loc-Three (71 .n Dloek T of COLUHHIA 270. 2 according to the cap or plat ~`•.t hereoC as recorded in Plat Dook 2. Page 79 oC the Public Accords oL ~~`l~ibelias Councy, Florida. -`4 I#: 2009487453 BK: 14004 PG. 577, 12/15/2004 at 02:16 PM, RECORDING 5 PAGES $44.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $9433.80 KARLEEN F. DE BEAKER, CLERK OF COURT PZNELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKRD25 Recording: + 4400 Doc. stamps: ; ; ~ Int. tan: TOTAL: ~~9 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPl~R$D BY AND, AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO:' David R. Punzak, Esquire CARLTON F]ELDS, P.A:. 200 Central Avenue, Suitg 2300 ,' St. Petersburg, Florida337.OL, (727)821-7000 (727) 822-3768 (Faosiripfe) °~ Grantee's TiNi ~ `~~ ~ Parcel Nos.:;t78 =15-175586-001-0010 ' 08-29;15-175586-001-0020 WARRANTY DEED ;' -"~,~`THIS WARRANTY DEED is given this ~ day of December, 2004, by ALEXANDROS GALIATSATOS, as Trustee of the ALEXANDROS GALIATSATOS INTER --VIV:OS TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 3, 1997, and STAMO G. GALIATSATOS, ,as.,_Trustee of the STAMO GALIATSATOS INTER VNOS TRUST AGREEMENT DATED .,MARCH 3, 1997, whose mailing address which is 305 Coronado Drive, Clearwater, Florida '~` .33767 (collectively "Grantor") to AGOSTINO DIGIOVANNI, FRANCESCO CARRIERA, and ~" ~ JOHN CONTI, as Co-Trustees of the TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST, together with full power and authority to conserve, preserve, protect, sell, lease, mortgage, develop, subdivide or otherwise manage and dispose of the real property described herein, including all those powers as set forth in Florida Statute section 689.071, whose mailing address is 163 Bayway Drive, Clearwater, Florida 33767 ("Grantee"). WITNESSETH: THAT GRANTOR, for and in consideration of TEN AND NO/100THS DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by Grantor, has granted, bazgained, and sold to Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, all Grantor's undivided one third (1/3) interest (1/6 interest from each Grantor) in all of the real property in Pinellas County, Florida, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof (the "Pro ert '); TOGETHER with: (i) alI of the right, title, interest, claim, and demand which Grantor has in and to, all and singular, the benefits, rights, privileges, easements, tenements, hereditaments, and other appurtenances pertaining to the Property, if any; and (ii) all improvements of whatever kind, character, or description to or on the Property, if any; SUBJECT TO ad valorem taxes for the year 2005 and any other taxes or assessments levied or assessed against the Property subsequent to the date hereof, and all of the matters described in Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof (collectively, the "Permitted Exceptions"); STPN376982.1 t PINELLA,q COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14004 PG 578 TO HAVE AND TO HOID the same in fee simple forever; and GRANTOR hereby i;ovenants with Grantee that it is lawfully seized of the Property in fee simple; that it has ,good; right and lawful authority to sell and convey the Property; that it hereby fully warrants the ti"tle to the Property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoe4er and that the Property is free of all encumbrances, except for the Permitted Exceptigns. ,~. This is corrim~i•cial property and is not, nor has it ever been, the Homestead of the Grantor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Warranty Deed on the day and year first above urften. i W SES;, (Si$n is . ~2 i' (P~t 1 gi nth' ine) Ign on is line) (Print name legibly on this line) .vt.EXANDROS GALIATSAT S, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ALEXANDROS GALIATSATOS INTER VIVOS TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 3, 1997 305 Coronado Drive Clearwater, Florida 33767 STAMO G. GALIATSATOS, AS TRUSTEE OF THE STAMO GALIATSATOS INTER VIVOS TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 3, 1997 305 Coronado Drive Clearwater, Florida 33767 STP#576982.I PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14004 PG 579 STATE OF FLORIDA C.) COUNTY OF PIlVELLAS;' _,T ;~ ~' The foregoing ins'tXq~nefit was acknowledged before me this L day of - 2004, by ALEXANDROS Gt1LIATSATOS, as Trustee of the ALEXANDROS GALIATSATOS INTER VNOS TRUST`AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 3, 1997 individua n ~ehal€a~ the Trust. He is personally known to me or has produced _~~11- le) driver's license ~ no. (y 43~- k1`"3S - 0~4 -O as identification. My ComrrtissioinExpires: ~; MYCOMMISSIgJ100030000 ~•~+r.,~,ER%RES: September 29.2005 ,~„q""~KK~""; ;eaaeemNrmmynucuner.~„. `•" STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) NOTARY PUBLIC (Sign re) . Pv (Printed Name) (Title or Rank) (Serial Number, if any) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2004, by STAMO G. GALIATSATOS, as Trustee of the STAMO GALIATSATOS INTER VIVOS TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 3, 1997, individually a ~ e a e Trust. She is personally known to me or has produced t~cal driver's license no _f>/~l'~•~:--~i$0-3~- ~6~ - 0 as identification. My Commission Expires: TARY SEAL) y$t~•~ ;s: ' OANOHPUIQ,yO MY COMMISSION/DDp30p0p ?Rl.,t~~ :cnaa 7lwNo~s~,~ ~~POQS NOTARY P LIC (Sign ~i-~~c v -~~,~ (Printed Name) (Title or Rank) (Serial Number, if any) STPti576982.1 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14004 PG 580 EXHIBIT "A" ~` :Leval Description of Property Lots i and 2, Block A, COLUMBIA SUB. NO. 2, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 2I Page 79, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. srranevsz.i PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14004 PG 581 EXHIBIT KB" Permitted Exceptions Taxes for the year.2005, and all subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. 2. Matters on Plat recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 79, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 3. Rights of tenants and possession under verbal teases. 4. DeclaFatgii~of Unity of Title recorded in Official Records Book 9849, beginning at Page 292, of the-Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 5. ;:,Rights' of the United States Government and/or the State of Florida arising under the UnitedStafes Government control over navigable waters and the inalienable rights of the State of Florida in the lands or water of similaz chazacter, as to any part of the Property which is sdbmerged beneath navigable waters or maybe artificially filled in land in what was formerly ,navigable waters, and any accretions thereto. STP#5'76982.1 I#: 2005019858 BK: 14067 PG: 1895, 01/18/2005 at 03:14 PM, $18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $15400.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC3 r s ~., with -<. c RECORDING 2 PAGES OF COURT PINELLAS WARRANTY DEED THIS 1NARRANIY DEED made the ~ day of January, 2005, by SEACOVE JERSFFIP-an Illinois General Partnership, hereinafter called the grantor, to TINO•.,b1GIOVANNI and FRANCESCO CARRIERA and JOHN CONTI, as Co- s :of fhe Tropicana Resort Land Trust, with full power and authority to deal in and e property or any interest therein including full power and authority to protect, versell, lease, encumber, develop, manage or dispose of the property, including all under FS689.071(1), whose mailing address is 163 Bayway Drive, Clearwater, FL hereinafter called the grantees: WITNESSETH: That the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN )) DOLLARS and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby uledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, alienss, remises, releases, conveys and ~s unto the grantees, all that certain land situate in Pinellas County, Florida, to-wit: FOR LEGAL SEE EXHIBIT "A"ATTACHED HERETO TOGETHER with all the tenaments, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. AND the grantor hereby covenants with said grantees that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2004. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has caused these presents to be signed and sealed the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Print: C~-~ Print: SEACOVE PARTNERSHIP, an Illinois General Partnership By: .~ - - e L. oberson, eneral Partner By:.~~~2 p Paul J.~" alischeid, General Partner STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State aforesaid and in the County aforesaid, to take acknowledgments, personally appeared EARLE L. ROBERSON and PAUL J. HOBSCHEID, General Partners of SEACOVE PARTNERSHIP, an Illinois General Partnership, who are personally known to me or who produced driver's licenses as identification. They acknowledge that they executed the foregoing Warranty Deed for an on behalf of said partnership. /Q WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and State last aforesaid this ~ day of January, 2005. (~ / / . /,~ RETURN ~: Prepared by: JERRY C. COBB, ESQUIRE 501 S. Ft. Harrison Ave., #206 Clearwater, FL 33756 P~^ r~rcoscoot+eut o~ ~p~omberl~,YOW R,fn ' +~wumorftinMa~e~c PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC: BK 14067 PG 1896 Lot 4 in Block A.ofCOLUMBIA SUBDNISION N0.2, according to the map or plat thereof recorded1<in"Plat Book 21, Page T9, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. PARCEL `NO.2: Lbis,2~aid 2-A, COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION N0.3, LESS the Southerly 45 feet thereof; arid:.~haf part of Lot 1 in COULUMBIA SUBDNISION N0.3, described as follows: Begin ;ate point in the West bound.uy of said lot, which said point is located 24.87 feet North along >, ""`said'line from the Southwest comer of said !ot for a Point of Beginning; and from the Point ~~ `~.o~Beginning thus established, run thence South a distance of 24.87 feet to the Southwest `~ '`°corner of said lot; run thence East along the South boundary of said lot a distance of 110 feet ,.~.~ ~to the Southeast comer of said lot; run thence North along the East boundary of said lot a ~_ '~ distance of 26.5 feet; run thence West in a straight line to the establfshed Point of Beginning. Together with the South 26.5 feet of Lot 1-Ain said COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION N0.3, `''-"` according to the map or plat thereofrecorded in Plat Book 27, Page 46, of the Public Records - of Pinellas County, Florida. EXEiIBIT "A" LETTER OF ~UTI-IORI~~TION This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (agent Name) with Northside Engineering Services, InC. to act as an agent for (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at .- , (Property Location) vinellas County, State of PLOtziDa. ,.. ~ ~~ ~ n' ;~ic~nai:ure cf .Property Own~.>> ~ ~' Print Name of Property ~?wner address of Property Owner _ ___ _ _ City/State/Lip Code ,~ Title ~ ~relephone Number --~________.~-. State of~ ~C~t'1~C`x___ The foregninc~ instrl.ament;Nas acknowledge before me this __~~ ~ day ~ ~ ~ --~ Gounty o~~~..~.~-'`i-~ of._~~~- --, 7_.i7C°~~_~, by __f `_..~~' i~ uvc c~v~:..-, as`~'` ------ who is personally known to me or who has prodr.iced ~~~~~___ ~~~i(fiiwflli! as identific~~tion and wllo did did not take are oath: ( ) \\,~~~~~~~LfN~t ~~~~sy,/~ ~~ G~aher 4,2pj 9•• y ~ o . ~: ~ - - * ' * ~ ~_1 ~'~ ~~ ~ _ - ' ~" ~ m.~ ~ CJotary Public ~.~ ~-- ' o ~~ NDD 722641 '+J~1 (Sig att~~e) /~ A •' 'y ~ ~~ ~ \~'.°~ 4 ' ••• 1 GUmmISSIUI ,.__._. - <,L AE3DVE:~. (S1_: ~_. '~t~~ ~ ~"~~~ ~~'r.rnr of h~totary Typed, f'r~s ~e~a <~I t~rr~~;eci) ~ Ll(~,~ ~"~1~c,~~ . _~ : ~~ 5 ~~ ^ ~1. ~_ a. ~~ e~ ~. ~„ ~~s omm.: 0827 M.F.1. NY: N.e. )rte: 03/79/09 Dmt: PLANT SCt1EDULE =~~ O ~ a e~ow~ ~/®~ a s a,~.~~o,~a lJ ~ o ,. PMR ~~ ~ ~~ ,~o~~,. ReP~,~.~. Ren~orc„~, ea ~~~,~ z~ a ,,. z ~, 9 ~~ o e.e ~~, ~~.~ .~ ~, ~~> smm ~o~ vn~~„~~ P~~~oe~b o~,~~~ ~. ~ ~ 3F ~ . ~ ® n s,; ~.,,, ,.~~a. ~,.r~m~2 ,..~~«,a m.m „~.r~, ,~b. . ®_ ~ .. V p J z J o f~ J so W ~°eY z ~ co ~a ~s ~ o'"S', o ,., o h z°Co W o ° -+ ~ oWLL Q "mac Z ism V MmW d Jm; O WW H oz~ x BUTLER DESIGN GROUP, IN ON Me Ilf. M. R. td~AR M1 m11 {~ oiuuM ~n ^ox ~nuo r1~ FOR THE BENEFIT OF: DIGIOVANNI HOMES JOB No. 090026 SEC. 8, TWP. 29 S., RGE. 15 E. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ~~(~~.L ~~iJ (~ ~l ~ d I ~1 V H®l .G L Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block A, COLUMBIA SUB. N0. 2, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 79, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. TOGETHER WITH A part of Lots 1 and 2, COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION N0. 3, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page 46, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1 for a Point of Beginning; thence Southerly along the Easterly boundary of said Lot 1, said line also being the Westerly right-of-way line of Hamden Drive (Hamilton Drive per plat), 167.41 feet along the Arc of a curve concave to the West having a Radius of 6507.52 feet, Chord Bearing and Length being S 06'45'36" W, 167.41 feet; thence N 83'02'46" W, 99.73 feet; thence S 06'57'14" W, 61.00 feet; thence S 09'04'50" W, 23.34 feet; thence N 81'44'25" W, 10.77 feet to a point on the Westerly boundary of aforesaid Lot 2, said point also being the Southeast corner of Lot 4 of the aforementioned COLUMBIA SUB. N0. 2; thence Northerly along the Westerly boundary of aforesaid Lots 2 and 1, 248.79 feet along the Arc of a curve concave to the West having a Radius of 6397.52 feet, Chord Bearing and Length being N 07'08'39" E, 248.77 feet to the Northwest corner of aforesaid Lot 1, thence S 84'27'30" E, along the North boundary of said Lot 1, said line also being the South right-of-way line of Third Street, 110.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. AND ALSO TOGETHER WITH Lot 1A, Less the Southerly 8.60 feet thereof, COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION N0. 3, as recorded in Plat Book 27, Page 46, ~ of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. The parcel contains 48,190.53 square feet or 1.106 acres, more or less. ABBREVIATION LEGEND: F.I.R. =FOUND IRON ROD (SIZE INDICATED) SEC. =SECTION S.I.R. =SET IRON ROD t/2" # 3983 TWP. =TOWNSHIP F.I.P. =FOUND IRON PIPE (SIZE INDICATED) RGE. =RANGE F.N.D. =FOUND NAIL & DISK (D) =DEED S.N.D. =SET NAIL & DISK # 3983 (P =PLAT F.C.M. =FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (M) =MEASURED P.R.M. =PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT (C) =CALCULATED P.C.P. =PERMANENT CONTROL POINT (F) =FIELD P.I. =POINT OF INTERSECTION (R) =RADIAL P. C. =POINT OF CURVE PB. =PLAT BOOK P.O.B. =POINT OF BEGINNING PG. =PAGE R/W =RIGHT-OF-WAY CONC. =CONCRETE TYP. =TYPICAL COV. =COVERED PP =POWER POLE ASPH. =ASPHALT O.R. =OFFICIAL RECORDS PVMT. =PAVEMENT P.S.M. =PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER ELEV. =ELEVATION CERTIFIED AS A LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATE: 10/9/2009 ,O fir/ /`/6,'„r~`' ,~ -------~E ~r EDWAR[~ %. ELLIOTT, P.S.M. # 3983 UNLESS !T Bt.ARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER THIS DRA,WIPJG, SKETCH, PLAT OR MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VALID. ~.~~AT~ON: ~aC~ _ .~_... 7275624961 PUBLIC UTILITIES ~• .~ ft .4, ~ .> U FA~C 1N(~SS~~~ ~~~r ~F cl,F,ARwAr~R ~ Pu~~EC uTr~.~ 1$60-C AR~CTURAS AVID, N. ~L.EARwArER, FL. $3765 PHONE ~7a7) 5~Z-~i~6D FAX {727) 6+~,~-A~SE33 ~ v~G ~ ~,. ~.~G~ ~S ~~3~ lam ~~ sr PAGE @1 ..~ N~DNI£~ER OF PAGI~S r~JIJO~U`ftlN'G THl~ C.`OP~',~R ~'.~C,~~ _~~ _, 05/05/2009 08:01 7275624~Ea1 b4/Y8~2009 15:47 72756{ '9 `~ 9fif13I?@07 X5739 7ZT5~s246F9 PUBLIC UTILITIES_~ t xo ~crn ~'~ F ~a Pl~se ~cxtr~nE ~~' a ~ ~~ ~ ~58.~~ ~t~r t,k>~d; tee;: ~w~i aciq~y ro sc,~+~3u~~. a ~ r,~} ~'~ stow ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I ~~~lt ~~ ~~~imQ ~z~a#dna~: ~ ~~ ~~x~ m ' . ~vcat~az~ ~~~~. ~' ~ , I ~1(~dlgl~~r o ~~~r PAGE 82 PAuE 91/02 pa~f, eirez T'~c f~~a~ ~t ~s .~+~.. ~y~~~ GG~-~"' f.1~~~~~ - e5~i65/2©E~9 D8: D1 i2. 5624961 PUBLIC UTILITIES ~o~o ~~ ~~~~~~~~~'~~ 'V~9G~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~1~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ (~ U ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ e ;~ -- ~,-.- ~ r r ~~'~P9~' C~ # ..~'° ~t~ ~~ PraGE 63 ~~f r D'S. ©5/2769 ~~: C~1 7275624951 _. PUBLIC IJTILITIES ~f~~~~~~1 ~i~~~ ~d ~~ ~~ ~~,~.~~~~~~~ ~~r~~~~ ~~~~~~~d~d~~ ~~~~~~~W~~, ~ ~`~' FBI r:~<. x''71 °~ ~ , '~~~~~~~~~ 1 ~ ~" 1 ~~~ / P(~GE 84 " E~6/©5/2©D9 ©3: D1 72755'4951 ~. PUBLIC UTILITIES i ~P~' ~~ ~~~~~9fi9a~~'~~ ~~~~-~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ C Y~~~°~ u ~ l~~0 d"~~~~A ~~~~ ~ ~ 1 d/~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~.... l P~'~GE D5 ~~D~~f~~~~ ~~~0„4~~TBG~~~ ~'~~`~ 05f05f'%009 08:01 7275624961 PUBLIC UTILITIES PAGE 06 C1~~! tit -' i Page 3 ~>rEc~' 1'11~~7`P.Y i .4pr 2~,,~.dd9 / d7.9 9 • I~ydr~nc TeS~~ ~ea~vice l~rd~r ' \~,.~~' + ~ A.C~~Oi~ ~;oC$~: 1T'II~ ll ~ ~' ~reatcd b . ~~'A~~ .n ~ 28-09 1 ~ 52 r?~~~4~11.~ I i ~I I~~II II~ i ~~~~~t~w~ ~a.te:.~ ~~~~~~~~~ p ~~IIIII~~I .... ........ .. I .~ 9 0 6 0 7 5 w ~ _....._..,..... .......... ~ ___...,...................... llistribution: ~JA'~'~.~ Customer.: 214354 NORTI-!SIDE NNGTNIJL1tlNG SERA%IGES, Phone number(s): Bi.iS 727-235-847 Ext. Renee ~ ........~.._... ,.... ... .... ~. ....._)3 G C) i i .r-- - ~~.n IOi.D ~ a; 2~1'~iPy, ..Y _.._-_....._........ .. _..... _ ._. of kcad: ... .. ........... . ~~3~~ ~ i ~;Fw ~t ~tcr/Asset Typc: rv,cw ~~~ ~, -- - StaCtist ;read/Camplctc Date: Cc nuletr~d U Y~ 'C'a~menam4:. ['1dS1CT)77G'7'fJQlG~,jrO!`~llEJ'P~` fXutit~ lest ~'IS0.011 /, ul n 1(J (c1 ,r.tv c:c~~-ner o1°Itn»silett i ~ ,ird st :' 7. at I,t€ 1 (c~? r2e epj•rtGr ofhrrg~it~a~rrk_r I.i enrwaa~s1r~ :` 3, czt # 3.~, nit v~,~,~t slde. of eoronrtrlr,,iu,st sautlr cf 3~~d .et. contact j~ersr~rt ~atl(l~e ~1.9r, lierzn~,4:a~hic is ~i7 ¢~6~~703ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ a. ? ) ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E511~5; 2FJD9 D5: D1 ?275624961 t 0~d1'2®12®®9 15:47 72iS6'~ ~?9 1 l~ PUBLIC UT]:LITIES ,, PAGE 07 P~a~.~~; 021F1t I ~..,,,mJl ~! ~~.Vb y ~ °^°,,. ~n.vg7Bg~s7t~a`.•- aw .-.~,~ ~n ~°""w ~, ~~~ ~LL` ~' CS ~~~'~`~• ,,.yW~m ~ ~ ~ of Ei _~ ,~ ~ ~~'~ ~ rg, :4iyp ~ ( ~~ r,, a,I o ~~ 4. ap ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~~ f~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~~. f ~r f Abp ovP ^°°"- 9fp ~ '°4~~ rT7 Yy