Loading...
FLD2007-06024 - 1200 Rogers St - Missouri & Rogers Parking Lot - Time Extension Request FLD2007-06024 1200 ROGERS ST M1550URI & ROGERS PARHING LpT PLANNER OF RECORD: S K ATLAS # 296B ZONING: C LAND USE: CG RECEIVED: 06/28/2007 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC CDB: CLWCoverSheet MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: A. Scott Kurleman Planner III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2007-06024 - 1200 Rogers Street DATE: October 2, 2009 Attached is information related to the request by Renee Ruggiero, Northside Engineering Services, Inc., for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 1200 Rogers Street. On November 20, 2007, the CDB approved a request for an off-street .parking lot (13 spaces) for this site. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on November 20, 2010. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to the current market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted aone-year time extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant. progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments that would significantly affect the project. There are no pending or approved code amendments that would significantly affect the project. Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order (October 14, 2008); and Planning Department Staff Report (November 20, 2007) S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Inactive Or Finished Applications\Rogers 1200 - Meek Parking Lot (C) 2007.11 - Approved - SK\Rogers 1200 CDB Time Extension Memorandum For 3.17.09 CDB.Doc September 16, 2009 Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Departm 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RF: FLD2007-06024 1200 Rogers Street NE S: 0724 Dear Mr. Delk: ~~~~~~ q i .n -I PLANNING €< DE`JELOP'.''=NT 5~~~?:'I:~S t CITY J' ,~~ ~~^.=~'~VF,Tr=R i$.~-ZCr3i!1~, L:a!?i~ IJsc" %~!3n~:-. ,;tr ~r? ~COt !?1 ~`.'1LE'1' I ~~?!33 j -r2?E?!3C l.)Lil;,v ~Jr.~i^r; . .-.!i!L ~ ~~ .,..4'{tJL!-i1:. 5.1~i1 .lil!i{li;>~;,I~;j !,.I rji~ We would like to request an additional extension to the Development Order issued for the above referenced property. On November 20, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed and approved our Flexible Development application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to allow an off-street parking lot in the Commercial (C} District with a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet, a reduction to the lot width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet. Also approved, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback fiom 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2-704.C.; and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3-1202G. The Development Order issued on November 26, 2007, provided a deadline of November 20, 2008 to apply for construction permits. On October 14, 2008, an extension to the development order was approved, providing a deadline of November 20, 2009 to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on the parcel. Unfortunately, due to continued extreme downward turn in overall economy, the developer, Mr. John Meek has determined that it is not currently feasible to move forward with construction at this time. This small parking lot with the required amenities, such as landscaping and the retention area became increasingly more expensive to develop, far more then Mr. Meek originally anticipated; although Mr. Meek would like to provide this additional parking lot for his tenants, the Community Center, and himself. With the current economic state Mr. Meek has determined it is not feasible to move forward at this time. 300 S. Belcher Road Clearwater, Florida 33765 tech .northsideengineeringservices.corn 727 • 443 • 2836 F,a,X 727 • 446 • 8036 We offer our assurance that the developer and his development team have worked diligently to move this project forward; the materials and labor associated with the project have been priced, the construction plans are completed and we stand ready to submit once the economic environment is a little more stable. It is our hope that within the n~;xt eight months the economy will reset to allow submission for construction permitting. While awaiting submittal of the documents for construction permit review we have obtained the required SWFWMD approval (Permit # 46033110.000). Please accept this letter as our formal request for an additional extension of one year to apply for construction permits for the Flexible Development approval. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this request. tf,.~liy, %~ ~ , Renee Ruggiero, Project annex Cc: NES File #626 D. Williams J. Meek 2 :_ - ~ ~ 1 1 2 V 1' ~. J L L' I'~ 1\ W t1 i 11 i\ ~~ _. ,~~ ~~'~`" = ~~~~ PosT Ortu:e. Box 4748, Ct.rluiW-,~~~e >ant,~ 337.58-4748 ~~ ,~y~ "~\,.~g~ Mt!nu:u~ac. Sra+vtc~ti Butt_t~tNC,, 100 Sou•rtt Mvx~t_sAvt;NUt:, Ct_t:nttwnnaa, Fro,uv,~ 33756 "'~.. q .'~~ i a~°'~,,-,~+° 1't:t.u~ItoNe (727) 562-4567 F~.x (727) >62-4865 du .yu+" PLANNING DI?NriR'I:a~IFN"I~ October 14, 2008 Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services Inc. P.O. Box 4948 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4948 RE: FLD2007-06024 - 1200 Rogers Street Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Ruggiero: On November 20, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for Flexible Development approval fora Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit an off-street parking lot in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet, a reduction to the lot width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C. and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3-1202G. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (November 20, 2008). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity_ The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On October 8, 2008, you submitted a request for aone-year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited a downward turn in the overall economy. In accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE aone-year time extension to November 20, 2009, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the building and site improvements on your parcel at 1200 Rogers Street. ~~,: c.~~i:~!. •~tl~icnae~rn.vt;Arrnc~t:~rneAc-nmli~u~icnta~~ October 14, 2008 Ruggiero -Page Two In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Scott Kurleman, Planner III at 727-562- 4553. Sincerely, ~/ 4 Mich , AICP Planning Director S: IPlnnning DepnrtmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnaetrve or Finished ApplicationslRogers 1200 - Meek Perking Lot (C'J- Approved - SKIRogers 1200 Time Extension D.O..doc CDB 1Vleeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner: Applie ant: Representative: Address: November 20, 2007 FLD2007-06024 E3 John H. Meek, Jr John H. Meek, Jr Northside Engineering Services, Incorporated 1200 Rogers Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelop- ment Project to permit an off-street parking lot in the Commercial (C) Dis- trict with a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet, a reduction to the lot width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2-704.C. and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Pro- gramper Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Commercial (C) District LAND USE: Commercial General (CG) PROPERTY SIZE: 0.154 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Lot Proposed Use: Off- Street Parking Lot ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Commercial District; Office LAND USES: East: Commercial District; Office/Retail Sales and Services South: Commercial District; Restaurant West: Commercial District; Vehicle Service CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is an amalgamation of Commercial and Office uses. Directly to the south is a McDonald's restaurant, directly to the north Staff Report -Community Development Board -November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007-06024 Page 1 of 7 is an orthodontia office, directly to the west across Missouri Avenue is Don Olson Tire and Auto Center and directly to the east is an office/retail sales use owned by the applicant. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.154 acres is located on the east side of Missouri Avenue at the northeast corner of Rogers Street and Missouri Avenue. The site is an irregularly shaped corner lot with approximate dimensions of 90 feet by 75 feet. The site is currently a vacant lot. Development Proposal: The proposal includes constructing a surface parking area for 13 vehicles. This off-street parking area will be used by the neighboring site to the east which has business hours of 8 am to 5 pm Monday thru Friday. All ingress and egress to the parking lot will be from Rogers Street. Flexibility Criteria: Pursuant to Section 2-704.I. of the Community Development Code access, to and from the parking lot shall be based on the size and design of the lot and approved by ..the Community Development Coordinator. Staff has determined that the requirement to have the two properties, joined with a Unity of Title satisfies the criteria. Section 2-704.I. additionally require that all outdoor lighting be designed and located so that no light fixtures cast light directly onto adjacent land and that the parking lot is screened with a wall or fence if it is adjacent to residentially used or zoned property..T:he proposed parking lot has no lighting associated with it nor is it adjacent to residentially used or zoned property. Minimum Lot Area and Width: The proposal includes a request for a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet, a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet and a reduction to the lot width .along ,Rogers Street from 100 feet to" 84 . feet. As the property is currently three small vacant lots"combined into one with a structure on the adjacent property to the east, there is limited opportunity gain additional property to meet the criteria; thus the; request. Setbacks: The Community Development Code .requires front setbacks of 25 feet and side !setbacks of 1Q feet as this'is a corner lot. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (west) setback,l'rom 25 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side. (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet; The proposed parking lot locates the pavement of the parking lot 10 feet to 14 feet from the front (west) property line, 10 feet from the front (south) property line and five feet from the side (north) property line. There will be a zero setback on the side (east) property line. These proposed front and side setbacks exceed or are consistent with the setbacks of most uses on adjacent and surrounding properties. The adjacent property to the east will be removing two non-conforming back out parking spaces with this development proposal. The proposed parking lot is compatible with the surrounding development and will provide needed parking. With the removal of two non-conforming parking spaces that back into the rights-of--way, coupled with the proposed front setbacks, the site will have an enhanced streetscape. A retention pond is proposed in the southwest corner of the parking lot adjacent to the rights-of--way. Landscaping; Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, this site is required a 15 foot wide landscape buffer along Missouri Avenue, a 10 foot wide landscape buffer along Rogers Street, a five foot landscape buffer on the north side and a five foot landscape buffer on the east side. Buffers are to be planted with one (1) tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage is required. The proposal includes a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along Missouri Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet for Staff Report -Community Development Board -November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007-06024 Page 2 of 7 approximately half the length with the remainder at 14 feet and a reduction to east landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet (adjacent to the applicant owned structure). All other buffers meet code requirements. Section 3-1202.E.1 of the Code requires the provision of 10 percent of the vehicular use area in interior landscaping. The proposal includes a reduction to the interior landscape requirements from 10 percent (456 sq. ft.) to 4.39 percent (206 sq. ft.) of the vehicular use area. The landscape proposal includes a generous tiered landscape buffer on Missouri Avenue including magnolias and over 100 shrubs. Additionally, two non-conforming parking spaces are being removed on the adjacent property and converted to landscape islands. Four species of trees are being incorporated including bald cypress, elm, magnolia and holly. The proposed landscaping will soften the parking lot appearance. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E of the. Community Develop- ment Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principle N/A N/A buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location .and/or materials of the land- scape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape pro- X . gram shall be demonstrably more-attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel. proposed for development under the minimum landsca a standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off N/A N/A when the business is closed. 3. Community character. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will enhance the community charac- X ter of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehen- sive landscape program will have a beneficial impact on the value of X property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for develop- ment. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with N/A N/A any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for develo ment is located. Staff Report -Community Development Board -November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007-06024 Page 3 of 7 Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Tables 2-701.1 and 2-704 for the Commercial District of the Community Development Code: Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent F.A.R. Com(C): 0.55 N/A X LS.R. Com(C): 0.95 0.68 X Lot Area Com(C): 10,000 square feet 6,728 square feet X' Lot Width Com(C): 100 feet (Missouri Ave) 67 feet X' Com(C): 100 feet (Rogers Street) 84 feet X' Height Com(C): N/A N/A X . Setbacks (Commercial) Front: 25 feet West ] 0 feet (to X' pavement) Front: 25 feet South 10 feet (to X' pavement) Side: 10 feet East 0 feet (to X' pavement) Side: 10 feet North 5 feet (to X' pavement) Parkin S aces Off-Street Parkin (N/A) 13 arkin s aces X ' -See the analysis above for discussion regarding setback reductions for further information. Staff Report -Community Development Board -November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007-06024 Page 4 of 7 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.C of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or develo ment standards set forth in this zonin district. X 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent X and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zonin district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly develo ment and im rovement of surroundin ro erties. X 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the ro osed develo ment X 5. 'The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter X the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum stan- dard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelop- ment of an existing economic contributor; d. .The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preserva- tion of a workin waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with .regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: X a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; ~ c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; O Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape desi and a ro riate distances between buildin s. Staff Report -Community Development Board -November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007-06024 Page 5 of 7 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X covera e, densit and character of ad'acent ro erties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use X of ad'acent land and buildin s or si ificantl im air the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X ersons residin or workin in the nei hborhood. 4. The ro osed develo ment is desi ed to minimize traffic con estion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinit . 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfacto and hours of o eration im acts on ad'acent ro erties. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.154 acres is located within the Commercial (C) District; 2: The site is currently vacant; 3. The proposal includes reductions to setbacks to pavement; 4. The proposal is to construct a 13-space parking lot; 5. The lot area is 6,728 square feet, which requires a reduction from the 10,000 square feet required; 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development and will provide needed public parking on the beach; and 7. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-701.1 and 2-704 for the Commercial District of the Community Development Code; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.and Iand the Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3-1202.G. Staff Report -Community Development Board -November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007-06024 Page 6 of 7 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on October 4, 2007. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL for the Flexible Development application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit an off-street parking lot in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet, a reduction to the lot width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2-704.C. and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3-1202.G. with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That a Unity of Title be completed and recorded for 1200 and 1204 Rogers Street prior to the issuance any permits; 2. That landscaping at both 1200 Rogers and 1204 Rogers Street be installed per the proposal submitted; and 3. That Planning Staff conduct a final inspection prior to the Certificate of Completion. ~.. ~F/ Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: : ~~ ~~~~~/,~.!''~--~~ A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLDJ (Pending cased Up for the next CDBIRogers 1200 - Meek Parking Lot (C)- 11-20-07 CDB - SKIRogers 1200 StaffReport.doc Staff Report -Community Development Board -November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007-06024 Page 7 of 7 Resume A. Scott Kurleman 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4553 scott.kurleman(a~myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III • Planner II August 2008 to present June 2005 to August 2008 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. • Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005 Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private properties. • Account Manager Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993 - 1996 Groveland, FL Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan. Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees. • Licensed Marketing Representative Allstate Insurance Company 1991 - 1993 Clearwater, FL Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance. • Store Manager William Natorp company, Inc. 1983 -1991 Cincinnati, OH Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products. EDUCATION GRADUATE -Certificate: Community Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHFLORIDA, TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Graduated 1998. Major: Management. AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER, Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in Arboriculture. ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414.