The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2009-07021 - 830 BAYWAY BLVD - CYC ADDITION RENOVATIONSFLD2009-07021 830 BAYWAY BLVD YC ADDITION RENOVATIONS PLANNER OF RECORD: S K ATLAS # 285A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 07/01/2009 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC CDB: CLWCoverSheet CDB Meeting Date: September 15, 2009 Case Numbers: FLD2009-07021 Agenda Item: D.3. Owner/Applicant: Clearwater Yacht Club Inc. Representative: Jay Myers, Myers & Associates Architecture Address: 830 Bayway Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit the upgrading and expansion of an existing social and community center in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 50,428 square feet, a lot width of 410 feet, a front (south) setback of six feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of zero feet (to existing pavement), a side (west) setback of 14 feet (to existing shed), a rear (north) setback of zero feet (to pavement and tiki hut), a building height of 27.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and 50 parking spaces, and (2) to permit outdoor storage (boats) in the Tourist (T) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provision of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-803.C. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH) BEACH BY DESIGN CHARACTER DISTRICT: Clearwater Pass District PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Social and Community Center Proposed Use: Social and Community Center EXISTING North: Preservation (P) District SURROUNDING Intracoastal Waterway ZONING AND USES: South: High Density Residential (HDR) District Attached Dwellings East: Tourist (T) District Attached Dwellings West: Tourist (T) District Attached Dwellings ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.15 acre subject property is located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard approximately 650 feet east of the intersection of Gulf Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard within the Beach by Design Clearwater Pass District. The site is occupied by the Clearwater Yacht Club. Currently, Community Development Board -September 15, 2009 FLD2009-07021 -Page 1 of 8 inefficient angled parking exists with little landscaping and the loading and drop off area do not function well. The Clearwater Yacht Club was established in 1911 and is one of the original 13 member clubs of the Florida Council of Yacht Clubs. The proposed renovations are part of the 100-year anniversary celebration. The Club is home to youth sailing, sunfish sailing, yachting, cruising, regattas and many more. The Yacht Club is open Tuesday through Sunday all year. The dining room is open each day for lunch and dinner. To the west, south and east are attached dwellings. To the north is the Intracoastal waterway, on which the existing docks are located. At its meeting of May 17, 2005, the CDB approved case FLD2005-01008, which called for raising the existing structure and constructing a new 18,500 square foot yacht club including offices, exercise rooms, restaurants and a parking garage structure. That proposal has since expired. Development Proposal: The current proposal has been significantly scaled down from the prior approval and is to construct a 512 square foot building addition, construct a porte cochere, reconfigure the parking lot, and landscape and screen the existing boat storage area. The building addition is proposed to address handicap accessibility issues with a new elevator and entranceway, and will be designed to match the existing facade. The current drop-off, pick-up area is elevated at approximately 10 feet above existing grade. The proposal is to have the drop-off area grade reduced to approximately four feet above existing grade. The current angle parking will be converted to perpendicular parking to improve circulation, emergency access and provide for three generous, 300 square foot, interior landscape islands. Additional improvements include foundation plantings and a large 15 foot wide landscape buffer to screen the existing boat storage area, which is located at the west side of the parcel. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable FAR is 1.0. The proposal is in compliance with the above as it has a FAR of 0.21. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The overall proposed ISR is 0.72, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-802, the minimum lot area for social and community centers can range between 5,000 - 10,000 square feet. The overall existing site is 50,428 square feet of lot area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for social and community centers can range between 50 - 100 feet. The existing lot width is 410 feet. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-802, the minimum front setback for social and community centers can range between 10 - 15 feet, the minimum rear setback can range between 10 - 20 feet and the minimum side setback can range between 0 - 10 feet. The proposal includes reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to six feet (to proposed pavement), the side (east} setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement and tiki hut). The side (east) setback is within the flexibility range while the front (south) and rear (north) are not within the flexibility range thus the filing of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application. With regard to the existing development, the current front (south) setback is four feet to pavement. The current four feet setback is sparsely landscaped. While the proposed setback to pavement is only two feet more, six feet total, it is an improvement and will allow some accent Community Development Board -September 15, ?009 FLD2009-07021 -Page 2 of 8 and palm trees to be installed. The existing side (east) and rear (north) setback of zero feet to pavement has been such for many years. In neither case is there the opportunity to remove pavement. The existing tiki but was constructed to a zero foot setback without permits, and as such a condition of approval is that proper permits are obtained for the tiki but prior to issuance of any building permits for the other improvements proposed for the building and site, and that no Certificate of Occupancy be issued for these improvements until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the tiki hut. Maximum Building Height: This site is located within the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design, which is silent with regard to allowable height. CDC Table 2-802 allows a height range between 35 feet - 50 feet. The addition is proposed at 27.5 feet, below the allowable range, and thus consistent with Code requirements. Minimum Off-Street Parkin: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-802, the minimum required parking for social and community centers is between four to five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed 11,012 square feet of gross floor area would require 55 parking spaces at five spaces per 1,000 square feet. At four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area the parking requirement would be 44 spaces. The proposal includes 50 parking spaces including two code compliant handicap spaces, which results in 4.54 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. To substantiate the requested parking reduction, the applicant has provided a parking demand study that indicates the peak hours during the week are from 8PM - 9PM and on the weekend from 7PM - l OPM. Generally the week day load is 25 cars (50 percent capacity) and during the weekend the load is 30 cars (60 percent capacity). When the club hosts regattas and formal occasions demanding increased parking requirements, patrons are shuttled from the Clearwater Sailing Center through and existing parking agreement. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. Any new mechanical equipment will be located on the roof and screened by the mansard wall. An existing transformer is being relocated and that will be screened by landscape material. Sight Visibility TrianPles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within the 20-foot sight visibility triangles. All proposed landscape material planted within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines will be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District; however the applicant has proposed a 6 - 10 foot landscape buffer adjacent to the off-street parking as well as a 15 foot buffer in front of the boat storage area. The buffers will be planted with palms including cabal palmetto and washingtonia. Along with the palms will be multiple species of shrubs and groundcover. The addition of landscape buffers will provide enhanced landscape design. Pursuant CDC Section 3-1202.E, ten percent of the vehicular use area Community Development Board -September 15, 2009 FLD2009-07021 -Page 3 of 8 must be landscaped with interior islands a minimum of 150 square feet in size and with foundation plantings provided along 100 percent of any building facade facing a street right-of--way. The proposal provides 10.12 percent of the vehicular use area as landscape islands. As discussed previously three of the proposed landscape islands contain over 300 square feet of planting area. This generous amount of space will allow the proposed shade trees to provide canopy over the asphalt surface. Lastly, foundation plantings with sabal palms and various species of shrubs and groundcover have been provided for not only on the street right-of--way but also the building facade facing the parking lot. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize the existing dumpster pad and enclosure. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Additional Applicable Beach by Desi~-n Guidelines: Section VII.D.l requires the area between the building and the right-of--way to be 12 feet in width to create apedestrian-friendly environment. The proposed addition will be 37 feet from the right-of--way. Section VII.F requires all surface parking areas to be landscaped so that the view of such parking facilities from public roads, sidewalks and other places defined by landscape material instead of asphalt. As discussed above, a 6 - 10 foot wide landscape buffer has been provided to screen the surface parking area from the road and sidewalk. Section VII.L.4 provides a recommended color palette. The existing building colors are gray, white and blue. The roof is a concrete barrel the that is gray and light blue in color. The proposed addition will be constructed to match the existing building. The colors have been found to be acceptable. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the social and community center use with the standards as per CDC Tables 2- 801.1 and 2-802: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Maximum FAR 1.0 0.21 X Maximum ISR 0.95 0.72 X Minimum Lot Area 5,000 - 10,000 sq. ft. 50,428 sq. ft. X Minimum Lot Width 50 - 100 feet 410 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: 10 - 15 feet South: 6 feet (to pavement) X' Side: 0 - 10 feet East: 0 feet (to pavement) X' Side: 0 - ] 0 feet West: 14 feet (to shed) X Rear: ] 0 - 20 feet North: 0 feet (to pavement) X' Maximum 35 - 50 feet 27.5 feet X Building Height Minimum 4 - 5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft GFA 4.54 spaces per 1000 sq ft GFA X Off-Street Parking (55 parking spaces) (50 parking spaces) ' See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board -September 15, 2009 FLD2009-07021 -Page 4 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.C (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent I. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive P-an, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard io use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and aonrooriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board -September 1 S, 2009 FLD2009-07021 -Page 5 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913: Consistent Inconsistent I. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X ~. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual. acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of August 6, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 1.16 acres is located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard approximately 650 feet east of the intersection of Gulf Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard; 2. The subject property is located within the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design; 3. The proposal is to permit the upgrade and expansion of a social and community center with a 512 square foot addition and parking and landscaping upgrades; 4. The design of the proposed addition will appear as an extension of the existing building with a similar height and similar exterior material and color; 5. The proposal includes front, side and rear setback reductions; 6. The proposal includes a reduction to required parking for a social and community center from 55 spaces (based on 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet) to 50 spaces; 7. The submitted Parking Demand Study demonstrates that adequate parking is available on site and from a remote lot to support the requested reduction to on-site parking; and 8. There are no current outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2- 802 of the Community Development Code; Community Development Board -September 15, 2009 FLD2009-07021 -Page 6 of 8 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application (1) to permit the upgrading and expansion of an existing social and community center in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 50,428 square feet, a lot width of 410 feet, a front (south) setback of six feet (to pavement), a side (east) setback of zero feet (to existing pavement), a side (west) setback of 14 feet (to existing shed), a rear (north) setback of zero feet (to pavement and tiki hut), a building height of 27.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and 50 parking spaces, and (2) to permit outdoor storage (boats) in the Tourist (T) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provision of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-803.C, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all boats or trailers stored within 27 feet of the front property line be relocated behind the 27 foot front setback requirement; 2. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 3. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, all utility and communication lines be placed underground and electric panels and boxes be painted the same color as the building; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all necessary building permits are obtained for the existing tiki hut; S. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a Certificate of Occupancy must be issued for the existing tiki hut; and 6. That prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and the Fire Department be addressed. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: ' A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ^ Location Map ^ Aerial Map ^ Zoning Map ^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ^ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending Casesl Up For The Next CDBIBayway 830 Chv Yacht Club (T) 2009. Yr - 9-15- 2009 CDB - SKICleanvater Yacht Cheb -Staff Report.Docr Community Development Board -September 15, 2009 FLD2009-07021 -Page 7 of 8 Resume A. Scott Kurleman 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4553 scott.kurlemanna,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III • Planner II August 2008 to present June 2005 to August 2008 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. • Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005 Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private properties. • Account Manager Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993 - 1996 Groveland, FL Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan. Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees. • Licensed Marketing Representative Allstate Insurance Company 1991 -1993 Clearwater, FL Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance. • Store Manager William Natorp company, Inc. 1983 - 1991 Cincinnati, OH Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products. EDUCATION GRADUATE-Certificate: Community Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Graduated 1998. Major: Management. AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER, Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in Arboriculture. ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414. A. ~ FIRS7 ~ z m ST z O SFCOIVD DF`o 'Li sr N DR rH~~ ~ sr ~ ~° ~ z c~ o 0 "V $RicNr WATER DR FIFTH ST g BAYSIDE ~ ~R PROJECT SITE ~-_ GULF1, 2 ~~, g~,VR a r S ~ LOCATION MAP Owner: Clearwater Yacht Club Inc. Case: FLD2009-07021 830 Bayway Boulevard Clearwater, FL 33767-2613 Site: 830 Bayway Boulevard Property Size: 1.15 Acres PIN: 17-29-15-05022-004-0050 Atlas Page: 258A A a 2 ~ -I ~ CLEARWATER HARBOR ~ - -I 16523 ~ 43262 ~ L 909 J 12 t3 1 to I1~ 1 r O 16519 ~ t 5 e I ~ a 1 tt I Orp58 s 10 1~ ~-1-.,~ a 1~ ~ 0 5 ' e 1• 11.~°5g2~ 1 ~ A~AY BLVD e~ A n ~ B t ~ 87 ~ ~ ^In ~l;l ~ r°D. ~ n r°j. O ~ ~ ~ 6522 O ~ O 8 ~ 70 e I-' ~ O 5 1 , J 16525 r 1 . L. J ~ L5076 ~ 2t ~ t~~ 9 ~ a ~ 7 O ° 1 8401 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ a ~e 820 P z ^° S GULFVIEW BLVD s ~ s Lo5o7s - ~ s ~ h $ $ ~ ~^ n O X6515 W = O a ~ 8 5 1 8 1 16517 ~ 7 O ~ 2 L05076 J ~` L ~ O y O 2 Q h O CNp 4 ~oxs> 2 715 qO Ot O 551 r 16521 ~ ~ z EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP Owner: Clearwater Yacht Club Inc. Case: FLD2009-07021 830 Bayway Boulevard Clearwater, FL 33767-2613 Site: 830 Bayway Boulevard Property Size: 1.15 Acres PIN: 17-29-15-05022-004-0050 Atlas Page: 258A a i P m pp ~ 8$0 0 w ~ N W N n BAYWAyBLVD ~ s7 ~~ ~~ ~~~~ "~ ~ ~ HDR ~o N ~~~ ~ ~Q ~~ Q ~ S GULFV/EW BLVD ~ ~ `~ " ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ W 5 ee ^ 0 ~'G y T ` ~ ` a y ~ DiJ/ll P 715 551 ZONING MAP Owner: Clearwater Yacht Club Inc. Case: FLD2009-07021 830 Bayway Boulevard Clearwater, FL 33767-2613 Site: 830 Bayway Boulevard Property Size: 1.15 Acres PIN: 17-29-15-05022-004-0050 Atlas Page: 258A o z a _ ~I ~' i . •~ ~ ~~ ~ , j..~ -`T ~ ~ ..y ~~ ~ 9 ~ ' ,~ .~ j _ t y ` I I,` ~. ~ 1 ,' I. - ~ ~ r~ i _ .~e y ,` ` A 1 ~ l ~1+ rr 7! ~ ~`~. ~ ~ ~ ~:R - ~ - - _.. . ~ ` i ~t~ r.. ~ .~ r t . ~ n~ Ffi < < •c`,, ~ ~ w~ ~ r ~ T # 1~ r ~. ~ I s' ~.,~... _ .. 1 ' ,, , .. k ...~ ,~~s ~ _ .. r" ,r ~ , ~ * _ L _ i n, .... L`i~i LLB ' ._- y.,f•~l ~« ~' ~ ~t, -' ~ 1 •~ - ~ ~ II,b.., <..~ 1 ,.y. '. r .-. K, ,, ~ ~. y,..,- ~r ~ , AERIAL MAP Owner: Clearwater Yacht Club Inc. Case: FLD2009-07021 830 Bayway Boulevard Clearwater, FL 33767-2613 Site: 830 Bayway Boulevard Property Size: 1.15 Acres PIN: 17-29-15-05022-004-0050 Atlas Page: 258A ~~ ~... ,5. Bcywoy'slvd ~.f,,; 830 Bayway Boulevard FLD2009-07021 West side of subject property. Existing entrance. Rear (North) of subject property. Existing parking lot of subject property. Dock azea of subject property. Existing tiki baz area at subject property. ....'~ 830 Bayway Boulevard FLD2009-07021 Front (South) side of subject property. West side of subject property. Property directly across the street (south side of Bayway ). Front of subject property. Adjacent property to the immediate east. Boat race storage area. `Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: 5200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 100 ~ -- CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT I A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: u,ec~~~ac~~ Ya.~ll.~ Gtub I ~n.c. . 3D $u t„3a l.. Gl~u.r~..t0. ~L_ 337(p7 Z~ ' Lf~ "7 • <odOC7 FAX NUMBER: -7 Z - 4 - EMAIL: ~L_ ~,yta~~{-um~ctlp~~ ~f. CCStyt_ r 72 ~ - 59 5 - 7 I ao FAX NUMBER: ~7- 430 - y 13Z-. EMAIL: ~~ •545•"71 . V~CTCO Nq _ p v~'4 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (C/~ode Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: GYG Aad:•~1o~1 0.vtc~ ICLVIbdC~{-i;py>L,~jROJECT VALUATION: STREET ADDRESS ~j4j p ~~;~ ~~ f3t v d 1ecar-.zc~ker FL PARCEL NUMBER(S): I? • 2.9 I~j b~Q _7_ ' Opy • bU O PARCEL SIZE (acres): I (~ ~ ~L`~ PARCEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 50 o A 11, _ ~ _ _ .1 PROPOSED USE(S): 3 v~~ dUU . ~o -~G7 - 2G~ 1 ~ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Speafically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) l~e,du ~~ i oK, t,1 ~rirorL# 5 ~kloacl.c ~i ovn 1 O ~ ~° ~-o ~o - O.`~ a ~ coal poin.~ ~Q a5 In~l-4- 0.vtrb {-o (o~-O° rv r fit] ran ~ ~,. e ~ ~e art. rea~;re_d Pctk~.~~ -~rt7/rt 4. ~:~vocuments and 5etungs~derek.fergusoMDesktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS D ) A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO~ C~ yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ^ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the sale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properfies in which it is located. ~ pr~s~ed aeveJaow+e~.-l- -Ec~ ~~ex;5-4; ~ ~ke_ utit.~ re. - ~-ti ke >?: ~ w ~ }I-r.. -Ekc ~.t e o ~ (-I~tr 5 vrrov-1d; rwi are.c~ ~5 ,,set I o~5 b~l k c.o„e. rc,~r,~ c~~ ~ dens; ~ . ~ ~e cl~aruct-e. r o~-1-~.e _ clncav,.c~ 5 far-. ~nas {1~e.. c~c.~i s -~t wto rte. ;v~. L; vter, W ~~t c~a~>A ~t -4-- 2. ~ro~Per};L~ avt,d eac 0.5 a r.J alt._. Th pro sed deve opment will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The ~r?~e.d. cytr.~+nc.~e~-, cv-~prc~~ ~1~.~ ~v~ck;p.~c~.t:}-y a-•r.~ cuc~e,~ ~I-~o ~ s; ~t.._ Av~cL dots vto ~l rvr~p~a; r }~t al rec,. c1 ~ c~v2l.o ape d c~.~c..c. evl ~ b~ ~ 1 a. >~t.C,~ G~ t,s:l1 t :1,c~1,( ; vt.Lx`e.u5t` {~ ~ vc~ly e v i vL `aLL~ o rS 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. ~~ ~ ro.0o5 ~~ WL~ fOYQy~IEYI'~~ ~, +: ~~ ~t_5~ ~+~Y~ ~~ ra ~~f? L~ `H/l t ~-ut.~-~-Lt S ~ ~- to :aklhrt~,ood ~ lwt.~v;vw~ c:-rc.~~,c~invL o..•r.~ ~cc.esS ~c~~t~U_ ,[~k: ct c 5 a vt. ~ a.d.d.:-~. ovu~l F, pa ~ kw~K~4(~v1n~ c~.n..5 . 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. `~n~ ev~Dn42~ G~nGU~Geb 0.Ye.a~~ ~ i,~~Dr v :rc.>~c,~.-~-ia+iL. ov't. ~~. Si 0.1/!. PyV(P'(A~L~.1 Y~4-LI,;G12.- CICL~-°J~ W~~~-LL GJ~`~ VIr1~Vl.iN~i -~-{~(~~~[ Go 1(i. C~ ti ~' ~ ONL . ° 5. ~ The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. "~~ d.eve,l,o~tvu.~v~-~- -~ Govtc5~rc,~vt.-~ w~~11, -(11e c1nc~.YC~~~-erg o~ -~Lre b ccLt-e t /LCt~ Y~ e~.~ylr~ ~ OrK/~I.O+~L. t.o L O fS I u ~ ~/L d ~VL~ SCLl1f~~ dLt ~ I }"5 (~S/~ _ ~ V" [fh Cam. ~rw r `n..~-- G.~Lj . 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ~.~ txlrtw.tc.e.d. land ~~t,,~;n~owt..dlc,~,~oyT;I.lc.\~d:vt ~ fie- adds};o+-c. ,-t I rti ~ ACV •/e.. y;bu a.t u>~d a cy~ +-~ cw,d of ~c.}a rc.~ ;wt,~p k ~ Q.vt;3 k~ ~ c~ ~ l~ O~P~-~ru,-~~5 o1~rtKa v-.orvtnc~.l ~urS -for -k~t,~ b~c,.c~ 0.~ricc< <"o~GLI~v 1:00 cf~r•1 kc 4D'. Vp~,~. . C:1Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ^ Provide complete responses to the sa (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA-Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. E.x~~~-i.~t.u. cov~.d: }-:ofr.5 ova e~,rre.~•~It,r no~u>n torw~ ;+~te~ rcvtd d-Lt~ ~vro ~(I.titt/~-~' ~ vt,~c?.r_s..b-c'~ v~ d i ~-; c~ vL5 ~a r' c~rc.e_5 s c,~-~ ; l : }-- y u~d. b ,r ~--z~, 5 ~'k~ 5~~.. VYlo+r't_. ivt ~,1~tt_ v-~~I C,urr~"Vt.~- CDC~P.4 2. . The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general pur p ose , intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district - -7 ~ l Vim- ~P~IGI V 1(1 wtey~'~ 15 C.~ ~/L 5 ~ ~'0r/Lk~ W ~ ~'t- '~ .e CO ~Vl IF'~-~2..yL`~ i ~. ~ ~il. Ct `7 1 ` -syu k. ot..5 }"~ ~JT-vl~V ~~_ 115Qy ~ ~' A[~c'1'~ ytC~.VIC~.~ LU-~/~C'~_ ~,G1~GLr'IC~i-'l.~ ~c~~ . a.vt_ ele~,~c~~-r9-t" . tea. o~lties kL~~v~S ctN~re~-l~,re~c, v ~~d ~-~~- kLt~ 5 t ~c..l. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. T1n~ dwe~,u to wt, eK-r ~~ tan ~- ~ vK v~c~~- r.~tn.~o s u rr'v t,~.d'~a ,o,rr~,~ s ~--~P S _ ~ ay -4-~ ~d-d.~;pn ~5 \oc~~t~ vttt~r irlnL cex•4•ec- o~ -~.c 5;~ cJL~ I(l.b G~['e.C.t-} ~VuCY°LG~S~ iy~ {~_iGk~ l'~ v0~,u1~~C C~ 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development Ad- o: -ti: t w ; tl v cwt. 'wt. +-o v~ yr e ~ d e.r~-v ~ l.x.~ GWt d ,,•~ ~ 1 ~ v r I/ltS r' ~ = Gl r~ K O ~ ~ ~D ~~ UY~yL~etti} , 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use gtegory, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a signficant economic contributor to the Citys economic base by diversifying the bcal economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for deveopment or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. Tke. u5~ -ti ko r~+~;w t~vuLta augc~. cow. -,~s ,,.~; Vt ~ ~ oust ~-v•1-v~ ~atil.d v5~ . and .h ~ e~el,~>DvneK~ o~ a-~L. ~c~'~•k~„n.c. t~.~vrLL~ne, WCA~eX~rny~-- tJ~2. a..vtd eX~S~~~ F_LVrloyrtiL CR-V~~Y'~IotiJ'~-D~ . 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed developm ent provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate dista ces between buildings. n 1 ~r ~Ov2~PU41?~ ~P~/~~o,Pv~C'.rt.~r G~.IIoW~ de.~m~c~Jne-v~~ O~ 5~1rYM1v~Ai vt4 1t~YCN~<<}~~1"~ i b ~ e1,1 ~'~ ~ G>,~t;,~ - vt, L:v~ro w - kl.i ~-1..t, C: k-~ ccv i e\ i t~~ oyt. Zl- I~~ ~1.r bu 17e5 t.vf_ ~ c~vtd tne~ ba c~vL;e~,T_~,; ~,cb , c~v~d tia~;l d: h{-Q~o1~c~c..~c.5 ~-n ct,ve. o~w ~ C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc i v~.~-C.~`J~-+~rl~ \ t~ ft~.~-V` ~~Page 3 of 8 `~ ~'~ d.2=~j~d~v1L>-C~ -E'~rtt` ~0.Yt:L~S Cu ~• e 1GG2~c~ /I/~,t vt i VKVtrK- 5 ~"ClY1~YG~~ E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4202.A.21) ^ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applipfions that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must indude a stortnwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Stonn Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall indude the following; ^ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all properly lines; ^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ^ All adjacent streets and munidpal storm systems; ^ Proposed stormwater detenfion/retenfion area including top of bank, tce of slope and outlet control structure; ^ A nanative describing the proposed stortnwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of Ciiy Building Permit), if applicable ^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER Pt.AN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): 'y Stortnwater plan as noted above is included • Stortnwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor _ elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE F~EQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727} 562~t750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by specles, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indipfing trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a 'certified arborist", of all trees 4° DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parkingrstamdar9s (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such studyJstiall be`approved bby the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering princlples. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as appligble; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:1Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonWesktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 3&"): ~/ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; / North arrow; / Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ~ All dimensions; ~ Footprint and s¢e of all EXISTING buildings and structures; _~ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; _~ All existing and proposed points of access; ~/ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, incuding / description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; / Location of all street rights-0f--way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas / and water lines; ~ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; ,/ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landsppe material; Location of all onsde and offsite storm-wafer management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; / Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typipls of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. ^ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: / Land area in square feet and acres; -~ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; / Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; / Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the / number of required spaces; ~ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces ii driveways, expressed in square feet ri percentage of the paved vehicular area; / Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility /easement; ,/ Building and structure heights; k/ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. EXISTING REQUIRED ~D LF 2$ L . l b acre-y -~ y -- ~ ---• 10.~Od ~I(~ S 3~~19 5e-G ~rV~.t.~ Zst'Hn 7(0 . (o .21 PROPOSED -----~ ._-. I- OIZ sv Z ~+ ~~ 7 527,5 Z~{ . ~ .. _ 72.`1, 1.0 21 ^ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %: X 11); ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: ,/ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; ~/ Offsite elevafions if required to evaluate the proposed stortnwater management for the parcel; / All open space areas; / Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berths; ,/ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _~ Streets and drives (dimensioned); ~ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); -~ Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and Setfingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24° x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; ~/ Names of abutting streets; ~ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ~ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; .~ Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landspping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by specles, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landsgpe materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant / schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, spedfications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, badcfilling, mulching and / protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched andlor shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and / percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A.23) ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: '~ All sides of all buildings ~/ Dimensioned tors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) ./ Materials ^ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to sale on 8'/: X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals} ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate appligtion and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:1Documents and Settingslderek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager orhis/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan_ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the Citys annual list of moss hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE] Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a °Scoping Meeting° held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-56213750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Cade for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applipnt must initial one of the following): ,{ Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all Cam- roadway legs and each fuming movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. rj- e{, o~.~t?~, . CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ^ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculafions/watersfudy requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flaw CalculafionsNVater Study is included. Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FORA FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLA,,S Swom to and subscribed before me this 30 ~"'` day of "r k ~- ~D. 20~to me and/or by /Jk fia r~.'t (~„ 6 G r who is personally known has Ty . ~~ d - ~p}tY =o Signature of property owner or representative Sandra Jo of Florida C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD} 2008 07-11.doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: 2. That (1 aMwe are) th owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property ddress or general location): 3. That this property constitutes property for which a request for a: (describe n: est) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointe and (does/do) appoint Sce ~-~~L~d . as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or oth cements necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the C' of rwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by ity representaU sin order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the p party described in application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, reby certify that the foregoing is a and correct. Property er Property Owner Pro Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the u ersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the 51ate of Florida, on th day of personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes d says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Ezpires: C:1Documents and Setfingslderek.fergusonlDesktop~planning dept forms 07081Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-t 1.doc Page 8 of 8 oQ ~O f.. w q ~~OI Uwx ~3 a~ w z au d U4 w.a O F -a Ew A O U [w. ~ ~3 w~ z a v. • V V LYV'V ( V RAMCO FORM M3 .acrrat~tp ~ee~ r. (~~iS, a 11~TErt#ur~, Made. this 14th day of ~y p,~ CLEARWATER POINT LAND COMPANY 14 1405202' 72 006:1. It:'iA7~ a0 L"• ~~ 41 c5:,.' :- lit, G2 9:;. `. G ST _ 354.E G =f' A. D. 19 76 a. corporation een Florida " , having iu principal place of ecistinS under the laws of du Stale of busincu in the County of Pinellas arrd State of Florida and lawfully authorized to rmrtsan busineu fn rlrc Stare of Florida. pally of the first part. artd TAVER BAYLY, DONALD F. BRACKETT, GEORGE E. W. HARDY, SPENCER S. SCHEIDEMAN, JOHN A. TAYLOR, JOE R. WOLFE, TRUSTEES OF CLEARWATER YACHT CLUB, INC; their successors in ~ gust National Bank of Mailing address: % George E.W. Hardy Clearwater - P.0_ Box 179, Clearwater f Florida 33517 of the County of Pine7_~.as and State o pan y of tlu second part ~Bttnessetl~: That the said pony"of the first part, far acrd irr w,uideration of the sum" of --Ten- (~10 00 __-- Dolhrrs, and no/100 - ---------- riled, to•it irr Irarrd paid by tlu said potty of the sewed part, the receipt whueof'is hereby atbrowledged has gra bargained and sold to the said part y of the sewed part, its lommm~asrig-u fore-t=r, tlu following deurr7rad acrd State o Florida, to-wrt• land situate, lying acrd bein~~ rn the County of Pinellas f LOTS 5 and 6 and that part of LOT 7 deslineeofaLOT 7lwhich said Begin at a point in the north boundary point is located 14.65 feet east of the northwest corner of said LOT 7 for a point of beginning; and from the point of beginning thus established, run thence west along the north boundary of said LOT 7 a distance of 14.65 feet to the northwest corner of said LOT 7; run thence southerly. along the^boundary line~bet~ henceaeasterly 6 and 7 to the southwest corner of said LOT 7; along the southerly boundary of said I;OT 7 a distance of 15.35 feet; run thence northerly in a straight line to the established point of beginning; .in BLOCK "D" of BAiYBIDE SUBDIVISION N0. 6 - UNIT "A", according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 51, Pages 4$ and 49 of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Together with submerged land and riparian rights appurtenant thereto. This conveyance is made subject to taxes for the year 1976 and subsequent years. " This conveyance is also to include all right, title and interest of the party of the first part in and to the boat 'slips adjoining the above described property. 40 Rec _ ~-=-°O - P-II/EL1.AS ~C04 f~L~OR~FIDA _ ~~. 41 St 2SS~pO _ ~ „uS~~"~"~ 42 Sta --53_Sa_ sr"_%Y, Ctar_i::1 cv.~Ri 43 Int . -------a = SAY. I ~ I ~ ~!9 ' ~ ~ Tot 3s--y -° -- ~Y~ ~.•. •• At1E%t ~~~L~ $ccrdary t'TFAR1rA`PFR POTRt'r' LAND COMPANY ... .:./' ••. c .": ~ , seule~ aelii~ereD i}z~resenre of us. ~,-c`~. ~a~n ~•~~'"~_•M,~ GE . resident '~" 7,",~~~ " ~ And nc~ raid party of the tint pan don hereby fully warrarrr rlu ruk to raid land. aird will defend the • :same agairar:the Iaw~trE clairrcc of all pawns whomrorva: . ~n ~tflte5s ~ljerenif, nc~ safd party of the first • 'r ~ • '- .- , (Corporate pan /ras carried then prrsarU to be sigrsed fit fts name by `_ -. Seal) _ ru proper offcas, and its wrporare seal to be affccrd, attut- ,~j . l~ cd by iu secretary, the day and year abasr wrftte2 1'IuJ jrurrurHnrt ~ppnt Was Prepared Bp J. A 1,1~JINGSTON, OF Addrea PII~-T-A~ COIINt'Y TITLE CO1dPANY B41 Court street Clearwater, Florida as°9 necessary incident to the fiilfilLnent MYERS & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE, AIA, P.A. AA-0003461 ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE • LANDSCAPE DESIGN • ARBORICULTURE 9170 Oakhurst Rd., Suite 3B Seminole, Florida 33776 Le4al Description of ProQerty• L1=GA_ DE5GR1°TDN PER ;IFFIGIA_ REGG`RDy BGGFc T42~ PAG°_ 1G3T PARGE_ ':4" Lots 5 ana o ana that part Cf Lot T QeSCr GeQ a5 FouGtuS Beg n at a point In the north Boundary Ilne Gf Lct T wr. Gh 5814 polrt 15 lacatea 1=.n5 Feet E ~t CP Lne NCrLnwest Gorner Cf 5ald Lot T for a Point Cf Beginning; and frcrr the Po1nt Cf Beglnnin•a thus estabusreQ run thence rve5t along Lie NC'th voundary Cf 5ala Lot T a distance Cf 1=.05 Peet to tie Northwest Gorier Cf 55Id Let T, run thence SCrLherly alone Me ooundary line Oetween 5ald Lots o ar.d T to the Southwest Gorier Cf 5ald La T run thence Easterly aICnG Cne SCULne~ly Oounaary Gf 5ald lot 7 a Q15tar•Ge Of 15.35 Peel; run tnenGe M1^rtnerly Ina 5tralNrt Ilne tC the e5tabllshed Point Cf Beglhn.r.g: solo p•slrt oeing m BIOGK °D° Gf WAYSIDE SJSDriiS On NO. n - JNIT '~,~ aGGOrQInA CC the rap Cf plat Chereof a5 reGOrQed In Plat BOOK 51, pa;.e5 -}o ahd ~y Gf tie publlG reGCrQS Gf Plhella5 GGUh:y. Fior da. Together wltn suemergea lava aha r parlan r gt-CS appurtenant thereto. P.4RGE~ "B" Lct T. less ana except that part descnbeQ as foliow5 Bean at a pOlnt in Me North Ooundary line Gf LCC T wr Gn said polrt 15 1GCated t=.~5 Peet East Cf the NOrLhweSt Gorner G•f Sala Let T for a Point Cf Beglhr.ing; an0 Prcrc the Point of Beglhnlrc ChuS estaC115rea. run thence rve5t along tie Noun oounaary Gf solo Lot T a alstarce Of 1=.05 Peet to tie nOrLhwest Gorier Gf sa1Q Lot T, run thence Sauthe-Iy along tie Oounaary Ilne oetween 5a1Q LOLS S ara T CC the SG•uthwest Gorner of Said LCC T; run Chence Easterly along the SG~uLhe~ly oounaary CP saga lot T a Qlstarce G•f 15.35 Peet; run thence NerLherly In a stral.~rt Ilne CC the estanusnea Po1nt Cf Beglhr.ing; ai50 all of L.^.t5 0. 9 10 aha 11 In BIOGK "D" Cf B~YSID_° SJBDIV 5.^.N h0. o -JNI ~ ':A°. ~GGOra nG to tie rap Cr plat hereof 85 reGCraea In P18C BOOK 51, pages 48 ahQ 49 Gf tie puCtlG reGO'Q5 Gf Pihella5 Gour.ty. Flor.da. Togethe- wth .,uome-gea land and r parlan ngnts appurtenant Lhereta. Sincerely, Jay F. Myers, AIA i=hone: '72~-595-'7100 1=ax: i21-595-138 E-mail: myersarchc~ix.netcom.com MYERS & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE, AIA, P.A. AA-0003461 ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING ~ INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE • LANDSCAPE DESIGN ~ ARBORICULTURE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9170 Oakhurst Rd., Suite 3B Seminole, Florida 33776 July 9, 2009 RE: FLD2009-07021 -Clearwater Yacht Club 830 Bayway Blvd. -Parking Demand Study To Whom It May Concern: Based on personal observation, over the course of my membership with the Clearwater Yacht Club over the past thirty one years: The current parking lot consists of 52 spaces, with no handicapped spaces. Adding these 2 required spaces would bring the count to 50 existing. The proposed lay-out not only brings the site into compliance for emergency access, it significantly eases circulation and improves the vehicular flow on the site, minimizing congestion. The Flexible Development Code requires 4-5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. With 1 1,012 sq. ft., this would require 44 to 55 spaces. We are proposing 50, or 4.54 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. This private club operates from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM. Peak hours are from 8:00 PM to 9:00 PM during week days and from 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM during the weekend. Generally the week day load is roughly 25 cars (50% capacity) and vehicles tend to remain for 2 to 3 hours. During the weekend 30 cars (60% capacity) is the average, remaining for 4 hours. Most of the time for normal functions like lunch, dinner, weekends, and parties there is always parking available on the site. There are a couple formal occasions during the year, and if there is a large crowd, valet parking is made available at an arranged off site location. For instance, there are two large invitational Regattas' per year and if there is increased demand for parking there are some off site spaces on the streets nearby, or if the sailors need to park for a longer period, they can park at the Sailing Center across the bridge. Shuttles are provided for transportation to and from the Club. This parking arrangement with the Sailing Center has been in place for roughly 10 years. The proposed changes to the building, while aiding functionality and accessibility, total only about 500 sq. ft. and do not add to Use, simply circulation. It will not add any more demand for parking. The club has functioned well for the past 31 years with no parking complaints from either members or the community and it is our belief this will continue to be the case, and the reduction to 4.54 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. is warranted. Sincerely, Ja F. yers, AIA -~ Phone: 727-595-7100 Fax: 727-595-7138 E-mail: myersarch@ix.netcom.com SYNERGY Civif Engineering, Inc. July 7, 2009 A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III City of Clearwater (Planning Department) 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: FLD2009-07,021 830 Bayway Blvd. Letter of Incompleteness Clearwater Yacht Club Dear Mr. Kurleman: 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater, FL 33759 (727)796-1926 www.synergycivileng.com Certificate of Authorization No. 27642 This letter is in response to your request for additional information concerning a traffic study, specifically item number (4) indicated in your letter, addressed to Jay Myers and dated July 06, 2009. The Clearwater Yacht Club is proposing to construct a 512 square foot building addition for the purpose of installing a new elevator, mechanical room and small lobby area. The use for the proposed addition will not cause an increase in traffic volume at the facility and does not exceed any thresholds set by the City of Clearwater with respect to required traffic studies. In fact the old parking lot is nonconforming and we are proposing to bring the parking lot into compliance with respect to City, Fire Department and ADA accessibility standards. On July 6, 2009 I met with Himanshu Patni, P.E. from the Clearwater Traffic Operations Department and he confirmed that a traffic study will not be required due to the limited size and scope of this project. If you have any additional questions concerning this matter please contact me at my office (727) 796- 1926 Sincerely, =~), ~' ~ ~ ~' . , ~ ~ ;. Michael J. Palmer, P.E. President Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc. 3T'05'JIHdYa9 OL AI .5 ,l rrd-Id 311s ~ ~m -~ 6~1'd13Q 3115 2103 ~Inl7 336 ^D \' ^~ 6 0 8~ ~~ ~ g° s ~ ~ f~ ~~ e. ~~ ~~ ~ b0/Ll/ED ~~ 60/C_ 31VIV O/H L 9W0(IYJNI 05'~aOdOTJd 9NfJla!'d aas804 OH E 6ulvnl~ul EE = S x (pOOI/'7!'b6 1a7v7 LlOll) bb = b x (OOOL/"(~'ba IaaCj L10LU Ll0'Ll ='ld O5 Llf. lauo171vw, 00E'Ol Bu17GIxS ~ -apo0 ~uauulolanaQ alQlxald uaC pa.llnba.+ 6ul~luad (apm Oa SaOade O/H OU) Lfi - vavlnOJG BulYa6d 7w11I17 ~3f7151-mod Wd b lY i30 NNILL Ol 2BWLL NO 38 Ol 61H91~ 2101a31x5 ~lY ~31DN 1-1336'9NIdJx y7d .P.9L NYHl 3tlOw ON M1311 '.P.bL 9Wt51x3 - 1N913H 9NI0"IIlIB ld'IY Ll0'll TYlO1 M13N 1.1 C5 Ll5'fVNOWOW 35f1291N#J J.LINMVWDJ 91f/T/YiVS d0 9NI4111909W15at311 511Nn 9NIT3.fO 0350dOad O 59WT3..KI 9W1NX5 0 531YX 91'l "1d'05 BLY 05 V3bY OM"i 5Y3M/ 31TlIN~ A~N1N3wrYJ2YnN3 ON 'Vi9Q~15 (CCl.AO'71Y O'U !L' = 8L4'DE / 00' OL - (xiYd) OLLY21 3~1a' ?X'YJ. 'id II % b"LL = ELti 05 / L'LL5'LE - (251) OLLY?J 30Yd?Jf5 SfYJI/~?13dW1 % LI'OL = b'bB0'bL / 65bL - 9NIdY0E4NY'l 2KJI213LNI 'ld 'OE bOV'L - 9wdYOEONYI 21012131N1 032111p321 ld'055'LLS'LE ' ' -5/r71A2L3dWl TYl01 Td L6f+E[ OS9 ld 'OE b'bB0'4L `J3H10-6K7NTJ3dWl - 35(I 21YlfYJIH3/~ - 6fKJl/~213dW1 "ld 'L5 S'OGb'Ll ' ~ - Sf10N213d TdlOl T>3 cssEb c 'J.d 'DS 5'l9ti Ol - 9NIdV05QY'1 21p12i31w - 6(lO1n213d 2BHL0 - SfION213d ~ ~~° EL4~CE -3115 -IV101 d 3~/~i NOI1Y/~313 E-Y 9NOLLY/313 L-Y NY"b 315 1133FK 3tLLL I-Y SIWL30315 Lh HOLLN3/ 3bd NOI1T'IOd 97 5N01103501w/ 5'IN'13O 57 NY1d ut11N mN lOM1ND0lY1W7ZITlOH 4-7 Nlld OYf37 E-'J 5310N tY281~B9 L~J 133N~ ip/YJJ -7 .e d)c~ a ~ a3bW3a 38010NWTdJ I >~~ ~ ~ ~ ma~>rro. ~ ~ ~ ~ 3~,. ` ~ ~ n m o ~w is m~N w a b JAl I E 10'l ..Q.. ~I'JO'19 ~ 84 39'dd L5 X1009 1V"1d b 11Nf1 9 'ON NG~ISI/~IQ9f1S 3QI5.lH9 I ~ I ~ .-- ,una ~.a.w.s ---J N.nd rouvna3s ae ~u c-i .~I~,. o.,n.a„.~,~ ~., ~..w'~,~, ibad SL dJNtlTJ Hl(105 bZ dIHSFUYKJl ~B NOIJ.'J35 ~n-t~ 1~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~H1 01 5N011'dl`ON3Z! M]'i POR Vdl MANSPRD ROOF TO MATCH FM191® RQ~2_ 425' - sRwn~o FtsAE ~sn _____ ~ ~~ 5g1TH ELEVATION 06/30/09 REV: 08/7209 a $ ~= ~~ m ~~~ p~p C ~ H g w ~ v O NOR- EV-CATION EwsTwr, NErv 6RQ1N0 PLANE ~5~5' - _ J V H U ~~ ~~~ 10 b~~ ~vm J"t-~ ELEVATIONS a A-9 »~ :~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ N y 6 ~ ` IV ~t+ovnnor~ of GLEARYVATER YACHT GLUE MYERS f ASSOCIATES AfiGF11T5G111RE AIA PA Ono oacrx~sr rxoa.D ~i1E 9B SEMMOLE, FLGRIDA #~ EY a Q px3 e3o 5cu'M earner 6~w cLEaxrw.se, FLORmw ~r~ - sms - ~~oo F,nx ~s~ - s~5 - ~~se myeroarcnulxnetcom.com S~ Lp oe/ao/o4 REV: OH/12/09 ENSTM5 MANEARD Rq'F FNKHED FLgOR 6RGVNp PLANE 535' - _ a 0 J V F 2 v FILL M VYJ.L DOY'PI TO bRg1Np, 5N000 ~syT~ HFl"1 E~,~ BAIGQJY AND PAMT TO ~ ~~~1V STORE FROM WEST ELEVATION W~ 9TAR5 WITI MATGII E%BItN6 -~ _-~--~ SYSTEM - Iff1'1 RAILNb J ~~NpN ELEVATOR MOVgR, 9T0000 TO ATGH EXI5TM6 MBI® FLQ~R_ 425' - 6RQ1Np PLANE ~ Q c s ~ i <~ n 4 h K F LL ,~~^/j P W~ r h Zwb , `~ Y V ~ ~-3 ELEVATIONS A-9 ~ ExBrNb EAST ELEVATON xaf€~.-iJA'~---i ~'^ _~ ~~ ..~ .~ .lo _I ~ ~® ~~ ~~ '~ ~~ D _1 0 z N o ? r;, U+ ~r+ovnnoN of p MYERS d A550GU.TES ARGHITEGTURE AIA PA ~~ ~~ ~, GLEARYVATEFZ Y,4GHT GLUE 91'10 OPKHURST ROAD °a111E 38 SEMINOLE, FLGRIDA Q bbbl eso sang enrwnr e~w c~.wran-x, vl.aRmn Trr - s9s - -rtoo Fnx Trr - s9S - Tt9e myeroarcholx.netcom.com §~ ~ p ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ d' Illilllli. ~ p~~ m~~ i ZOO 1 ~~m ~~m ~°6 g~~ ~~ D~ T -N 1 .~ rye T 7 ~ 7 d i I I I I I d 7 ~ I \ I J I I I I d I I I 7 I I ____~ I .___J e T RL,+ovAriorv of ~ ~ MY~CS < A55O~GIATES A~tGHREGTURE NA PA ~Y g ~ GLEARWATER Y/~GHT GLUE ~" ~ - 91 10 OAKIURST ROAD 5UITE 3B SEMINOLE, FLORIDA 3 ro B'O SpITH BAYWAY BLVD GL EPRWATER FILJRIDA ~~ Q ~ N . , {~ T3T -595 - 7100 FAX TT - 595 - T13B myersarUlolx.netcom.com 6 ~.. -~ 2... Z Q..pper= 1 ~~ TZ ~~ ~ ~ N ~ ti I xnX ' ({ ~ Q~~~ ~ ~ , ` A ptl ~ ~ j -p m [\ ~ ~ ~ JAY F MYERS FNGLA CERTIFIED LANDSCAPE DESIGNER ~D6859 8 CERTIFIED ISA ARBORIST AFL 5542A R g r- RENOVATION ~ r+ra~s ~ ~55ocv~~s ,.~~~ .,~ P,, ~~ ~ P ~ !~ GLEARWATER YACHT CLUB 91"10 OAKMIRST ROAD SUITE 3B SEMINOLE, FLORIDA ~ ~ ~~ a ~ 830 5011TH BAYVWY BLVD OLEPRWATER, FLORIDA T3T _ gq9 _ 7100 FAX'13T - 599 -'1198 myersarcFOlx netcom cOm ~ '~~ S S . . , r---------------~ I ~ ~ i I ~ I ~ I I I ~ I I ~, ~---------- -----i r---gym---=-r- I Ex GABBIlE PALM'D I I r-~~e<wa I I O° l I Ex DATE PALMyt~< t IBAYSIDE SUBDIVISIbN NO. 6 UNIT A I PLAT BOOK 51 PAGE 48 BLOCK "D" EX CABBAb PPLM'~ ~ I u L0T3 I LOT ~~'.~ I NOT I N07 to MGLUDED tll MGLUDED li TI <o, a.a ,,,~<< I ' EXI5TM6 HET.Y~EIQJ +ce s I HE i M6RMgG PROFBtTY _ ]xY I ~~ ,~ 2 ~~OOTR°EL~Or'A,ED~ ?I F WD~~P09T ANZ9 I I I ` w . ~e RRa o~ '° ~. ~i Y - ~ L---_-__l-__ f, _ bv~ n 9f£C F cArlwS - W°°D R AM4 RADIUS TO BE fit0lFLTED: A NARONOODS . 1/S DRa'IJNE B. CONIFERS t 5ABAL PPLM9 - BJTRE DRIPLNE. _ _ 2. UPRI6NT9 - NO LE59 THAN 2" % T IJ.MBER. 5. HORIILIyTALS - NO LE55 THAN I' % 4' WMBER. BARREIE4 9HN10E ERECTED /BOND TRffS BEFORE COfTRUCTkJN. 5 UPRI6M P05T9 ME TO BE AT lBA9T 4 FEET M LENGTH WM A GMWUM OF I POOT ANLMORED N bROJND AND 9 FEET ABOVE Rg1MO. 6 BARRERB TO REMAM N PEKE UNTIL .WL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION NiD HEAVY EOIPMENT 5 OIT OF /ILEA FURTI@t MFORMATIGHI MAY BE OBTAMED FROM THE LAND RESOIRCE SPEGALBT AT %2~Tdl. ~ HA~ GLFl^RN/P' aw 2 •• © v ` ~] ~_~ _ rd B\E1RO A A 1 ~- wa /O 1 I ~~ 1~,aa ® BE R 4.O- ~ \ m-0- `N A9PN LT P RI IN TO /BL RELOO y TO BE REIGGATFD TYP d 1 10 ~A _ 14 ~~/ 10 15 Y GJLUMN5 TO BB ~ ~ RBnovtD ~ VD (P) ANV g - _ I L ro BE gP F mi -____ yn f$LTILIffi2 TABLET5 AS __IFlED. PLACE UNIFOR MLY AROUND ROOI MA% BETP/ffH MIDDLE Alm BOTTOM OF ftGbT MA55 ~,.,w rakr - 06/30/09 ~F)(P) ..F t ~`a _ ~ REV: E 9 ~° PALMSG uBBPGE 08/12/09 N81'0459' i a.N`_ o; ~ ` m I•~ .`s~~ a.o_ __ .. _ FouR STOrtr ~aP ~.TRO~ I. ° a. 8 _ r~ p m epknN< .aeVY l ~~ nr # _ e PPES ( E ~: -~ d a 3 ~IIg ~.w W'~: ~sRYNmR rIU'T CWb n. SuItD^'6 ~ ~-NEI6V$.TtM6 PROPg[tt 1'R ~ ~ 4 ~ rars<+<exr.. ~ D SPREAD _ ~ - 0 0° `~~ a 0 og 0 G MULCH 3 L~~ ~ FRRT 5TEM6 ~ \ ~ t a ~ Z ~ \ v ~--~ 9' MUILN L.4YEF O° ~ ~/ ® .w ~~ ~ng cABBAbe ~ ~ >_ FF V tiT~ .^ I ~ b ~ -E%STMG PNES ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ t iF ~ MF e 2 ~em 29 22 ~ ~ - ~ 1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN a F LL e: _ o r 8 r r 5' 10 20 bRAPHK'. SCiAIP O Y ~ O h ~ x'} Q a 9' Xt FII5MRI1B5/6RLUNGGP/9e Q s a -I- '+' TO BE TRVNGULIR SPAOM6. SEE PLANT LBT FOR (O.G.1 SPPGNG, ~. . _ , a O.G. SP~NG ~- BILK ~ GIRB/ 'P'N"I'~ 9Op- PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) N.T.S. I1tmBluRBED 9OL - Gea[wa[ar Yacht C ~ ub D90 Baauy BNG . CleanaRar Beech. FL 99TbT vd0 O ~9T05TW~Y®Ti CF ROOIBALL SPREAD HARD Ly U ~~ ~~ ~ ~< 4.2ao9 ~ SHRUB d GROUNDGOVE R '''~" ° IC~ rrtt Np. Rating I_ 3 5 D' C b o PLANTING DETAIL ~ '~ T'E ~~ 2. . 30 a bage PMm - f0 ramaln, fair cdlGltbn 0' CUeen Palm - W remain, fair ranEftbn ~ ~O N.T.S, 9. 4_ 9.0 40 D' Oxen PMm - to remeln, F<Ir cbnbltbn 0' GMpI< AlexMlb<r Pelm - t0 be relocMao, nice cggltlon 5UR Ca<S TAPE 6 RUBBER HOSE LOPED ~ TRIA~IK 5. 4A Multi-lrvik Fbua - gooo Vtt except mupltrunk. ony snaGe THRff 9TPKEB 2' X 3' X B' 9TAI~5 6 [rce on cite, fo r<nbm AT 120 APART MULCH 9' FROM TRUNK K SHN1 BE STRAIGHT HJD . T- 4.0 2.0 W' Wnhkgton PMm -yang Lrce, rolocstao 0'X20' Cabbage PMm -probably break In a wIM afomn MULCH 9' OSTH WTHM CURVES, FREE OF SCARS. BURNMARK5 Ahm BOOL9 .1 , 20 bW bA6E bALV WIRE TiLLEp Alm LODgQIBp NATIVE 5d1. BACKMLL i ~ n~ 1.5 0' % te' CMxaage PMm -week aKhry Lank '.9 M x ?0 Cabbage PMm -weak tree, pe aengeroua NOTE: SET RCKJT B ~ TO 4• PBWE 10. S Ultbtem ;+proxlmMely 4' okrKter Ficus -aetlbing win G ~ be rempvea ~ m 11. 1.5 MWClytem apprmynately 4' olameter Flw - oaGlning wn1 be remoVeo cool®N,I, ulml9Tlme[a 9°L ~Q ~ r - 12. 19 2A 0" Cabbage PMm - Lp be rcmpveo ' 5 LAYERS OF BURIA , Z 9 - 2'zb'k10° Vf A 1 . 14. I.S LS b CMlbege PMm - to be remceG, o Mnsgdl Lrunk 0' Cabb P l - t 2 T-dB THE k1mTH WpB BATTENS, F CONNECTED WtH 2-9/4' STEEL BMIDD, ~ - v ;~+ 15 age a m o be rcmo~eb, Eanagea trv'k " OF RIE ROOTBALL SPREAD EE 2'X4' WAD BRA . 10 1.5 6 Cabbage Pelm - L9 be rempv<a b Mlrgea Lnmk ~ry CE (3 EA, MMJ NNL TO BATTENS L STAKES . IT 4A 40 w- weemngtbn PMm - Lo be rMOCateb. mu trtt H' TREE PLANTING DETAIL r1LL® AND ILOSp~® T (912'x4'x90' WOOL'fN STW~-ri y~OD BARRIER DETAIL . 10. 4.0 W»hbgtan Palm - to be reb/alea. yovg [rtt 0- W»0ington Pelm - [o be rcbcM.ea. yoMg tree N.T.S. NOIF~: NAIVE 501E BILKPLL R0.0LBALL H' 501E SrWCER ARO WD PLANING HOE. N.T.S. I L L 19. 4.0 0' Gaa7bag< PMm - Fa be rebcatse, ywrg troe 1. ALL WOOD SHALL BE °9PRUCE CR PNE PRE---' -TREATED. FERTiI~ZB2 TIBIJ=1g 9' MUI.OH LAYER 20. 21 2.5 D- Cabbage Palm - [0 be romoveo, Aber tree " 2 REMPiE PLL 9TRM6 OCR WIRE WRAPPED PRO.Pm TRUNK 3. RBNOVE PLL 9TRAs9 ftOPE9 WIRE 40R 5TRM65 USED TO LIFT A5 SPEGIFTED. PLACE UNIFORMLY AROUND THE ROOIBALL TING UNDI5TIRHED 901E . 22. 2 O 2 0 0 CAnMJe PMm - to be rcmoveo. ober Vtt eottk Buah - In be , , , ROOT MA55 BEfY/®1 4. REMOVE ALL GatL/•P VOR WRE PROF1 THE TOP OP THE ROOT BALL. MDDLE AND BOTTOM MN. 9 TIMP9 THEW H TREE PRESERVATION PLAN ~. . 2° romo~eo, ne r erd W ilfe Bptu<B1Mh - ~ b< rcmweb. n<ar <na or nf` 9. TOP OF ROOTBN.1. i0 Be SET 2° TO a• ABOVE 51RROUNOIN6 FM P.aH bRADE. OF RLVi MA55. OF THE ROOTBALL SPRFPD PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA rota. 9tfE - so a23 sa FT ' F'EIZVIgX - pTFip¢ 70,256 5q. FT. PfRVI0U5 - II'ITERIOI¢ lAD5CAPMG - _1~ara r.,,-, FT ~~ TOTAL PERVIOU5 - 17,009 SQ, FT. IMPERVIQY - VENICVLAR USE - $.976 SCi. Fi. IMF'ERVIOIF - 0T5iB2 - 1~'l03 ~n F7 TOTAL IMPERVIW' - 90.6195GI. FT. '~ MTERIOR LANDSCAPING - 9.59H / 25.916.5.9 % ', IMF'ERyICVS F~IIRFACE RATIO (1581 - 30,679 /50,420 = 76.6 95 IMPERVIOUS i .rtR Hp(t$OR I FLOOR ARE RANJ /F~c I _ ,n w.. ~....__ _. I GL~, v , 9 09°52'49• E ~~.~) 26.63'(F) avo•e __.~i - -~--. I ~IVIStbN NO. 6 UNIT A DK 51 PAGE 48 .OGK "D" I LOT 4 NOT bl INCLUDED 3 eos~ ~.~ri.°~c°u+c - I ~ PGVR STORT (. MASONRY r7q &11Lpe16 I ~ -.1. 1~ ~ ~.r~ _ pOG~1XlF+'e peon) I I CURVE 2 "»rol ..oR=~~ ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ ""'- I I I I I I ~ i ~ I /~ // I ~~ /,~y~~~.y % ~' ,/y; ~ ~ ~~ ~/ ~ ICI ~ /I , ~ la I=1 ~/ // ~ IK ~ { /LOT 'i a U I~ II T PA\ KIN` \ ~ ~ `\ III LOT6 Ac~pHAL \ ~ ~ \`~. I ~ ~ ~ I I p~~~ I _ LOT 5 N 09°5745' W ~ 26.75'(P) r0:0 FCOr. r,~ m , r ca+c ern etorr xn - -~~..'~. I ~ p I -._. ~11 1 ~ ~ Fl I ~ Ex 11 I 8~ LOT 9 _,_ I, - LOT i0 1 " ,~ g I I p o- i~ pL i .~. ' _' e " b NL_ y~~ur w I ~\"n~ w+'' 11 wo-, ~ ,.~9m EXISTING SITE PLAN -sc,¢F rr-aa~~__------- 7ywL[~ puTT -~~ ~M,yr ~nJnN -~ . - _ _ _ -~ IMPERVIOUS -VEHICULAR USE w'" IMPERVIOUS PERVIOUS -INTERIOR LANDSCAPING PERVIDU5 a .Mc RE1~lO~~TIONS TO THE GL~~fi~Y~l~T~i~ Y~GHT GNUS SECTION 8. TOYVNSHIP 29 5011TH RAN! F 15 F457 vwcr~eexxv'rw rea ar~ru ae ;oavs acvK Lazo. vie ioeT I.ou s vie s.v mx ux w ~~ , aee~. mee v rona~, Fuenr~ ~s ~. ,. a...,4..~w u~x w.e m.c~e.4. rwny., I I I BAYSIDE SUBDIVISIbN NO. 6 UNIT A I PLAT BOOK 51 PAGE 48 I BLOCK "D" I L07 3 I LOT 4 I _ NOT I NOT I~ MGLUDED ~I MGLUD® I I no„~,. ,.~ I I I I I I euuow ~ I I I I I 9a, r~ L--------I-------- SGHEI~ULE c ARCHITECTURAL A-i TIiLE 5NffT ~ SnE R1N AQ FIEVATIG Ig A-9 ELE~/ATIGNS G-1 Cq.~9i SHEEP Ci] 6@I9tN_ NOBS LA ppd0 PLAN u HoRIZa+TN. l.ONTROL aro uTVrr Pl.w G3 DETAIL5 IND SEGTIONg Gb POUlITIQV PREVHJTION GT 51TE DETNLg 4] TRF£PRE #ftVATp.~PW: Ng To ee rse+o~.m -~ p~ FOR W~5GMM6. 5ff l-1 NOIE N1 EM~IOR LJbVfi5 TO BE ON TM9t TO NRN OFF AT 9 PM. 06/30/09 REV: oa/lvo9 (yd Q fi a LL „ ~8 Q~ 0 ~~ V Q W~ p r ~cn r.~ IM~evlws - 9-!,5]'1.5 sei. Fr. i PARKING - RE011iRm INTEftICR LANDSGAPM6 - ],409 50. FT. Current pb'klnA provided - 53 !no N/G 0pecee to code) INTERIOR LANDSGAPIN6 - ]499 / ]4,004.9 = 10.1] % Pa~king requlreL per Flexible Development Gode- IMPtliVIQlS SURFACE RATlO (19R) - 3-I,SZ1.5 / 50,4]0 =1].4 % MPERVId/9 EXlstllp 10,500 ~ Pddltlonel 51] 50. PT. = 11,01] FLQ7R .N2E RAT10 (FAR) - 10,500 /50,4]8 = .]1 (1.0 ALLOYED) 1110 V total eq.R.nooO) X a = 44 (1101] total ®q.R./1000) X 5 = 55 Inoluding 9 HG epecee PARKINb PROP05ED: 50 MGWDM6 ] M/G NOTE: ;> m 5EE CIVIL FOR SITE DETAILS ~_~ SITt PLAN * S' IO ~' bRAPHIG SGAIF ~ M STORM WATER NARRATIVE Prepare for: CLEARWATER YACHT CLUB Client: ~'In~rui~tnr V~~ht ~'I~~h ~.~ca~ rra~c~ ~ aa.~~~ a.~uv 820 Bayway Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33767 SUBMITTED BY: SYNERGY a~~ 3000 Gulf to Bay Blvd., Suite 201 Clearwater Florida, 33759 Certificate of Authorization No. 27692 July 7, 2009 Revised August 10, 2009 ,~ ,. ~C- ~~ ~~~ ~'9 Michael 1. P~Imer, P.E.- FLP.E. Lic. No. 63743 Page 1 of 4 STORM WATER PROJECT NARRATIVE PREPARED FOR CLEARWATER YACHT CLUB A. PROJECT NARRATIVE The Clearwater Yacht Club is proposing to construct a 512 square foot building addition for the purpose of installing a new elevator, mechanical room and small lobby area. In addition, a new Porte cochere, parking lot revisions and an FDC standpipe system (Boat Dock Fire Protection), is being proposed. The subject site is located within flood zone "AE" as shown on National Flood Insurance Program Map panel number 12103C0104G Map, dated 9/03/03. The site is within an area with a base flood elevation of 11 as indicated on the previously mentioned map. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site currently, contains one commercial building and associated driveways and parking areas. The entire parking area located on the west side of the parcel drains into an existing 18" RCP. The previously mentioned 18" RCP runs north and south through the parking lot and directs storm water into the Clearwater harbor located at the north side of the subject parcel. The 18" RCP is also located within a 10' drainage easement. The parking lot located on the east side of the subject parcel currently drains into Bayway Blvd. where storm water is directed westerly along Bayway Blvd and enters into the above mentioned 18" RCP. The site is bounded by Bayway Blvd. on the south, the Clearwater Harbor on the North, a four story building on the west and a four story building on the east. Existing Surface Conditions Pre-Development Lot Area (SQ.FT.) Total Impervious Area (SQ.FT.) Total Pervious Area (SQ.FT.) 50,428 38,619 11,809 Page 2 of 4 STORM WATER PROJECT NARRATIVE PREPARED FOR CLEARWATER YACHT CLUB C. PROPOSED CONDITIONS The Clearwater Yacht Club is proposing to make revisions to the existing parking area in order to bring the parking lot into compliance with current ADA accessibility, Fire department and City of Clearwater parking standards and regulations. The proposed design revisions include the following: • Re-stripe parking stalls {90 degree) per City of Clearwater standard dimensions. • Proposed drive aisles designed to be 24' or greater in width, to allow emergency vehicle access. • Turing radius design for emergency vehicles (fire trucks) • Handicapped parking per ADA standards and sidewalk accessibility. • Approximately 13, 445 Sq.Ft. of 1" asphalt overlay. • Approximately 3,500 Sq.Ft. of full depth pavement replacement. • Approximately 8,158 Sq.Ft. mi{ling and paving 4" depth. • Green areas to be used for treatment volume where grades allow. • Proposed drainage patterns will remain the same as existing conditions. Treatment Area = 3,500 Sq.Ft. of full depth pavement replacement plus 512 Sq.Ft. building addition Total Treatment Volume = (3,500 +512) x %" = 250 Cu.Ft. Proposed Ditch along Bayway Blvd. for Treatment Volume Cross Section Area ='r4 (9)(1/2)= 2.25 Sq.Ft. Length of Swale =120' Volume Proposed= 2.25 Sq.Ft. X 120 Ft.= 270 Cu.Ft. 9' Bayway Blvd. I Proposed Curb 6., Existing Sidewalk PROPOSED SWALE Page 3 of 4 Proposed Surface Conditions Post-Development Lot Area (SQ.FT.) Total Impervious Area (SQ.FT.) Total Pervious Area (SQ.FT.) 50,428 38,491 11,937 D. CONCLUSION The impervious area calculations indicate that there will be a decrease in asphalt area due to the parking lot modifications being proposed. A portion of the Storm water will be directed into a proposed swale located along Bayway Blvd. to allow for improved water quality. The reduction in impervious area and the creation of a water treatment area should reduce the impact due to storm water run-off. Page 4 of 4 SYNERGY Civil Engineering, Inc. 1 July 7, 2009 A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III City of Clearwater (Planning Department) 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: FLD2009-07021 830 Bayway Blvd. Letter of Incompleteness Clearwater Yacht Club Dear Mr. Kurleman: 3000 Gulfto Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater, FL 33759 (727) 796-1926 www.synergycivileng.com ro.+:A~~ro.,cn.w1,...:.~r:.,..M.. ~~~o~ This letter is in response to your request for additional information concerning initial fire flow calculations specifically, item number (5) indicated in your letter, addressed to Jay Myers and dated July 06, 2009. The Clearwater Yacht Club is proposing to construct a standpipe system for the purpose of providing fire protection to the boat docks located on the north side of the subject parcel. The system is designed based on the following hydraulic conditions: • The proposed system will be supplied with potable water from an existing fire hydrant located on Bayway Blvd. and is within 60 feet of a proposed FDC connection. • Fire truck pumps will supply the necessary water pressure to the system, not to exceed 150 psi. • The pressure at the most remote location of a proposed FDC connection will not be less than 141 psi at 1000 gpm when the fire truck pumps are supplying the system with 150 psi of pressure as previously described. I have included with this letter a copy of the preliminary standpipe system hydraulic calculations. If you have any additional questions concerning this matter please contact me at my office (727) 796- 1926 Sincerely, Michael J. Palmer, P.E. President Cvnnrmi ri~iGl Cnninnorinn Inr .rrnc~gy a,~vn ~nbn~cc~u~s~ nw. . 7 PRELIMINARY FDC SYSTEM CALCULATIONS Prepare for: CLEAr4iVVA T C~ YACr~ T CLi3B Client: Clearwater Yacht Club 820 Bayway Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33767 SUBMITTED BY: SYNERGY 4VILE]VGIVEFRNGy WC 3000 Gulf to Bay Blvd., Suite 201 Clearwater Florida, 33759 Certificate of Authorization No. 27692 July 7, 2009 `I -- Michael J. Palmer, P.E. FL P.E. Lic. No. 63743 Page 1 of 3 Clearwater Yacht Club 820 Bayway Blvd. Cleaewater, FL (FDC Hydraulic System Calculations) Preliminary (Final calculations to be based on actual fire flow results) The Clearwater Yacht Club is proposing to construct a dry standpipe system for the purpose of providing fire protection to the boat docks located on the north side of the subject parcel. The system is designed based on the following hydraulic conditions: • The proposed system will be supplied with potable water from an existing fire hydrant located on Bayway Blvd. and is within 60 feet of a proposed FDC connection. • Fire truck pumps will supply the necessary water pressure to the system, not to exceed 150 psi. • The pressure at the most remote location of a proposed FDC connection will not be less than 141 psi at 1000 gpm when the fire truck pumps are supplying the system with 150 psi of pressure as previously described. (Assumed 1000 gpm supplied at the existing hydrant) e~ ~ c c~ P~flfl FLIP I tNF Point No. 2 Schematic FDC System Design ~ (ivottoScaie) ~ FDC ,~-APPROXIMATE ;~~ LOCATION OP EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ~/ Actual Fire Flow Rate to be determined Page 2 of 3 Clearwater Yacht Club 820 Bayway Bivd. Cleaewater, FL FC ~ ~ ,stir:-: _ ,~ . P ._.,? '. ~.._ _ s,r -. -_,^r .... ~:fc.r~ arm r•a_tf~....-.i,.... a-: r;7. f'°'- Ltethca -r..e -.. ~ n _ _~ "u a sto-t C E e,tiation ~: I _ -~~ i' E e.ztion ,.= 5. ~f L~nga-~ __' ~3c _ _ce~f~a-..t 5_ _ G;sr, In[.~' Da'r~ ~~_~= i. _ ___ .~_~_ ~__~.a:x=. -iaeacar.~r:rcos o_ [-e-o_csm==c.r .. _._r_~~, _-_'-_~ =c. -=.- __e c Page 3 of 3