APP2009-00002 - 1520 McMullen Booth Rd - Bayside Bridge Plaza - August 18, 2009APP2009-00002
1520 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
BAYSIDE BRIDGE PLAZA
PLANNER OF RECORD: MJJ
ATLAS # 274A
ZONING: C
LAND USE: CG
RECEIVED: 06/10/2009
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
CLWCoverSheet
CDB Meeting Date: August 18, 2009
Case Number: APP2009-00002
Agenda Item: D.1
Appellant/Owner: Goral Tov, Ltd
Agent: Todd Pressman
Address: 1520 N McMullen Booth Road
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: An appeal from a Level One (Comprehensive Sign Program) approval
decision pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4-502.A,
that the requested additional attached sign as a Comprehensive Sign
Program is inconsistent with the Non-Residential Attached Sign
flexibility criteria as set forth in Community Development Code
Sections 3-1806.B.3.a.i and ii; and the Comprehensive Sign Program
flexibility criteria as set forth in Community Development Code
Sections 3-1807.C.1.a and b.
CURRENT ZONING: Commercial (C) District
CURRENT FUTURE LAND
USE CATEGORY: Commercial General (CG)
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Retail
Proposed Use: Retail
EXISTING SURROUNDING North: Institutional (I), Office (O) Office
ZONING AND USES: South: Industrial, Research and Commercial Storage
Technology
East: Pinellas County Retail
West: Medium High Density Residential Attached Dwellings
(MHDR)
BACKGROUND:
The subject parcel comprises 20.17 acres and is located at the southwest corner of North McMullen
Booth Road and State Road 590.
On April 23, 2009, a Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) application was submitted requesting an
additional attached sign on the southeast facade of the retail center. Following a determination that the
application was complete on May 17, 2009, staff reviewed the request.
CDC Section 3-1806.B.3.a.i and ii provides sign area to be calculated using area of building facade
facing the street frontage to which the sign is to be attached or allowing a minimum of 20 square feet per
business establishment with a principal exterior entrance. Review by staff determined that the attached
sign does not meet the building far~ade facing street frontage criterion or the principle exterior entrance
criterion as the sign is proposed to be attached to the south far~ade of the building which lacks street
frontage or an exterior entrance.
Community Development Board- August 18, 2009
APP2009-00002- Page 1 of 3
CDC Section 3-1807.C.1.a requires the signs proposed in a comprehensive sign program to be designed
as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel
proposed for development Review by staff determined that the facade of the building to which the sign
is to be attached is predominantly blank with limited architectural elements. The limited design of the
facade is appropriate as the facade is secondary and generally screened from view by trees and
vegetation. It is determined by staff that addition of signage to this secondary facade is inappropriate as
the signage would be out of proportion to the facade and more appropriate to a primary facade designed
with typical architectural elements. Furthermore, while it is understood that businesses rely on signage
to attract attention, a site visit confirmed that the sign would be visible from north-bound traffic on
McMullen Booth only when almost directly adjacent to the sight. Thus, the attached sign is found to
conflict with the intended use of signage in that the facade in which to be attached is inappropriate due to
its architectural theme and existing sight limiting conditions.
CDC Section 3-1087.C.1.b requires that the design, character, location and/or materials of all
freestanding and attached signs proposed in a comprehensive sign program shall be demonstrably more
attractive than signs otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum
signs standards. The proposed sign is to be designed with channel letters mounted on a raceway which is
allowed under minimum Code standards. Historically, under Comprehensive Sign Programs, the City
has not approved a raceway design unless physically the surface to which the sign to be attached only
allowed for a raceway attachment or the sign would be part of a shopping center where raceway design
existed as the majority of attachment method. The reason for not approving raceway attachment design
is due to this attachment method producing an aesthetically lower-quality design. Attaching channel
letters directly to building facade is the preferred method and has been used in the majority of
Comprehensive Sign Program approvals. And while raceway design has been used in the subject
shopping center, channel letters mounted directly to building facade is also used and produced much
higher quality signage. Therefore, the attached sign is not deemed demonstrably more attractive than
signs otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed due to the raceway design.
On June 5, 2009, the Planning Department issued a development order denying the application, based
upon the following findings of fact and conclusion of law:
Findings of Fact:
1. That the 20.169 acres is located at the southwest corner of McMullen Booth Road and State Road
590;
2. That the subject properly is currently developed with Retail use approved through FLD2007-11033
on Jan 15, 2008;
3. That the proposed sign is located on a building facade which does not front aright-of--way;
4. That the proposed sign is located on a building facade void of an exterior entrance;
5. That the proposed sign is not integrated into the architectural theme of the building to which to be
attached;
6. That the proposed sign is not proportional to the space to which it is attached; and
7. That the attached sign is not demonstrably more attractive than signs otherwise permitted under the
Community Development Code (CDC) minimum design standards due to its channel letter on
raceway design.
Conclusions of Law:
1. That the Comprehensive Sign Program application is not consistent with the Comprehensive Sign
Program review principles as per Section 3-1806.B.3.a.i, 3-1806.B.3.a.ii, 3-1807.C.1.a and Section 3-
1807. l .b of the CDC.
Community Development Board- August 18~ 2009
APP2009-00002- Page 2 of 3
An appeal from the above Level One (Comprehensive Sign Program) decision was filed on behalf of the
property owner by Todd Pressman on June 10, 2009, consistent with the timeframe established for an
appeal to be initiated in CDC Section 4-502.A. Pursuant to CDC Section 4-SOl.A.3, the Community
Development Board (CDB) has the authority to hear appeals from Level One (Comprehensive Sign
Program) decisions.
Pursuant to CDC Section 4-504.A, the CDB shall review the application, the recommendation of the
Community Development Coordinator, conduct a quasi judicial public hearing on the application, and
render a decision in accordance with the provisions of CDC Section 4-206.D.5 granting the appeal,
granting the appeal subject to specified conditions, or denying the appeal.
It is noted that pursuant to CDC Section 4-504.B, in order to grant an appeal, overturning or modifying
the decision appealed from, the CDB shall find that based on substantial competent evidence presented
by the applicant or other party that each and every one of the following criteria are met:
1. The decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of this
development code; and
2. The decision of the CDB will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this development
code; and
3. The decision of the CDB will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
ATTACHMENTS:
^ Development Order Issued onJune 5, 2009
O Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
^ Location Map
^ Future Land Use Map
^ Zoning Atlas Map
0 Site Photos
^ Resume
/~~`'-
Matt}~ew Jackson, Planner II
L-~ .
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlAppealslMcMullen Booth 1520 Bayside Bridge Pla_a (CJIAppeal Staff Report 2009 06-18.doc
Community Development Board- August 18, 2009
APP2009-00002- Page 3 of 3
Matthew Jackson
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727)562-4836
mathhew.jackson(a,myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
^ Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater Florida October 2008 to Present
Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and
variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of
development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning
assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning
ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review
committees, boards, and meetings.
^ Planner I
Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007
Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances.
In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained
submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead
project kick-off meetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting
documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject
matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs.
Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made
disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities.
^ Manager
Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004
Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment
complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and
inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and
delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing
and special events.
^ Linguist
US Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995
Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military
readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering
operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian
authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison
between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training.
EDUCATION
^ Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007
^ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004
Community Development Board- August 18, 2009
APP2009-00002- Page 4 of 3
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
~~~,~ Te ephone ~ 727'562-4567
Fax:727-562-4576
^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
^ SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION
^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
1520 MCMULLEN
APP2009-00002
BAYSIDE BRIDGE PLAZA
Zoning: C
APPEAL APPLICATION
Level One and Level Two Reviews (Revised 03/29/01)
BOOTH F
atlas# 274A
~~LI GtNAL R~C'U
~ JUN 1 0 2009
I PLANNING
~YLI;A~t/ 1 Y YL UK YK1N 1
APPLICATION/NOTICE OF APPEAL (Code Section 4-502.A 8~ B)
An appeal of a level one approval (flexible standard) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the subject of the approval
within seven days of the date the development order is issued. The filing of an application/ notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision
pending the final determination of the case.
An application! notice of appeal of appeal of any decision of the city, as provided in Section 4-501, may be initiated by the applicant or any person
granted party status within 14 days of the decision. Such application shall be filed with the city clerk in a form specified by the community
development coordinator identifying with specificity the basis for the appeal and accompanied by a fee as required by Section 4-202.E. The filing
of an application/ notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case.
A. APPELLANT AND AGENT INFORMATION:
APPELLANT NAME: GOral TOV, Ltd.
MAILING ADDRESS: Please use agent
PHONE NUMBER: 727-804-1760
AGENT NAME: TOdd Pressman
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 6015, Palm Harbor, FL 34684
PHONE NUMBER: 727-804-1760
B. APPEAL INFORMATION
CHECKTHE SPECIFIC APPEAL:
Appeals to the Community Development Board
^ Orders, requirements, decisions or determinations made by
an administrative official in the administration of the
development code, except for enforcement actions.
^ Administrative interpretations of the development code
^ Level One (Flexible and Minimum Standard) approval
decisions
^ Denials of any permit or license issued under the provisions
of this Code
Appeals to a hearing otFcer
^ Decisions of the community development board regarding
level two approvals
^ Decisions of the community development board regarding
level one approvals
^ OTHER (as alloyed by Code)
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT APPEAL (if applicable): 1520 MCMUIIen-BOOthe Rd.
SPECIFIC CASE NUMBER TO BE APPEALED (if applicable): CSP 2009-00001
DATE OF DECISION: June 5, 2009
FAX NUMBER: 1-888-977-1179
FAX NUMBER: 1-888-977-1179
Page 1 of 2 -Appeal Application (Level One and Level Two Reviews}- City of Clearwater
n~i~rN~~ aEC~~
~uN ~ o Zoos
n~ w r~uiun_
C. BASIS OF APPEAL:
Explain in detail the basis for the appeal. Use additional sheets if necessary.
The sign proposed is attractive and is not outlandish onr out of the standards of the development -and is nicer
than many signs at the site currently. The sign is also a very, very, very small portion of the wall it it proposed to
rest of the development. While the sign is not formally 100% addressed to a right of way, by view of the public,
I 1 II -
Rnn}hc Rnari that is almost Q~UaI t0 visibility of a tvnical wall sign Finally the uniaue toROgra{~hy
of the site precludes the visibility of most wall signs in the shopping center. The rise of the land at
D. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
representative
of
A.D. 20~ to me andJor by
who is personally known
7b a) .'~.. S , has
~
produced ~ ! L*~ , ~ ~i r ~ r~ ~' t L ~ Lam-' as
identification. _....___,____~yy
~~
•r 7 ~ , /lw
Notary public,
My commission expires:
IW1S2lPDSlPlanning Dep~rtmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlAppeal Application.doc
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ day
i`~IS
naw Aac - sw. a tea.
oo ~~w ~. ~o~o
CiomiiMon t oo ~8
ea+eM dy thtlot'at Nohry Awn.
Page 2 of 2 -Appeal Application (Level One and Level Two Reviews}- City of Clearwater
`~ ~
A~9~ T1 ~._ _
/. w
'~f f .._
~~; ~~~:,
_~ ,-- ~ _ ,
~~'
;~
,
rPa '",
A;:
Pi.a~~ivct D~_i~.~Rr.n-KT
June 5, 2009
Todd Pressman
28870 US Hwy 19 N
Suite 300
Clearwater, FL 33761
®RIGdiVAL REG'D
JUN 1 t1 2009
Rd..AdV dVtdV G
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Purr Orru:E &~x 4748, t,i.EARwATex, FI.()RIUA 33758-4748
MI:M(7PAL SFRYI(:F~ Blll1)I\G, 100 SOUTH MvRn.E AVElYIiE, C.IFAR~L'ATF.R, Fi.oRiaA 33756
'TECH(>NE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865
RE: Development Order -Case CSP2009-00001- 1500 McMullen Booth Road (Bayside
Bridge Plaza)
Dear Mr. Pressman:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-1008.E of the Community
Development Code. On June 5, 2009, the City of Clearwater Planning Department reviewed
your request for a Comprehensive Sign Program to permit an attached sign with increased square
footage on the south building facade under the provisions of Section 3-1807 of the Community
Development Code (CDC). The Planning Department DENIED the application with the
following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
Findings of Fact:
1. That the 20.169 acres is located at the southwest corner of McMullen Booth Road and State
Road 590;
2. That the subject property is currently developed with Retail use approved through FLD2007-
11033 on Jan 15, 2008;
3. That the attached sign is not demonstrably more attractive than signs otherwise permitted
under the Community Development Code (CDC) minimum design standards due to its
channel letter on raceway design;
4. That the proposed sign is not proportional to the space to which it is attached; and
5. That the proposed sign is located on a building facade which does not front aright-of--way.
Conclusions of Law:
1. That the Comprehensive Sign Program application is not consistent with the Comprehensive
Sign Program review principles as per Section 3-1806.B.3.A.i, 3-1806.B.3.A.ii, 3-1807.C.1.a
and Section 3-1807.1.b of the CDC.
"~u~ La+rurrMe~T .~.~u Aeriu.annctA~~'ion EHi~(ovoe"
aRiGiNAC. R~
JUN 1 0 2009
pi,.ARlAiiiVG
The applicant may initiate an appeal of a Comprehensive Sign Program pursuant to Section 4-
502.A within seven days of the date the development order is issued. The filing of an
application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination
of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on June 16, 2009 (seven days from the date
of the issuance of the Development Order)
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Matthew Jackson, Planner tI, at 727-562-
4836 or via email at matthew.jackson(c~mycleatwater.com.
$~incerely,
~' r
Gina Clayton
Assistant Planning Director
Page l
S''+Plannine [~panmcnt'+[ b F3'tComprchcnsivc Sign ProgramlMc:Mullcn Baxh'+h1ch9ullcn Fiwxh 1 QUO Ciay,idc 13ridgc Plaza`+D.O..Fh;niaLd~x
Clearwater
..
Planning Department CASE #:S@li or CSP~~ - ~~ ~
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED:
Te lephone:727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865 RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
^ SUBMIT ONE (1) COPY OF THE FOLDED PLANS (see C, D, & E below)
^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 400.00
COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM APPLICATION
~~ oe+a~I
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT
~iG1NAL RECD
I
~ ~ ~) 1 ~ 2009
i
iPILANNING
[ati.9Y~PAL P1PAY~.~ 7Ir Iai~r~ dM~s QanprMlw~IMs ~i P-rop-al~ Ir ~ Pam A-A~ir P~4' wMws and braiMwr~~r w~Y
>~I~ b d~raAop ~>y~oMrlY'~. paldlYrr axd~oilYnr abrade and b i~row Mr a~iN~a filar ~' dL~-Na6r. 77~r pr~pare~
pw~ranat>~wnniANrb~i~iarana~Yn~rda~r~rar~db~ri~~crAMiS wlilahwravnrlY~ta~r~~not/~ws~ndMerais
i~ctanllaeaeadhr~ ao~a~irra~oirardgrr~-d~rd~r G~-dLirwir.
A. PROJECT LOCATION:
p~~wppR~~ 1520 McMullen Boothe Rd.
pA~.,dNwg~~ 09/29/16/84343/000/0010
B. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT NAME: GOral TOV, Ltd. (see Secretary of State's info for Dalfen U.S. Property Corp.). Murray Dalfen)
APPLICANT EMAIL: USe agent
MAILING ADDRESS: USe agent CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PHONE NUMBER: USe agent FAX NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S): GOral TOV, Ltd.
(Must include ALL owners)
OWNER(S) EMAIL: AGENT: PreSSInC~aOI.COm
AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) Todd Pressman
AGENT EMAIL: PreSSIrlCt~aOI.COm
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 6015
PHONE NUMBER: 727'804-1760
Check if AGENT is Contractor
^ Sign Contractor Name: NO
State License Number:
Palm Harbor STATE: FL ZIP: 34684
FAX NUMBER: 1-888-977-1197
Page 1 of 0-Comprehensive Sign Program Application -City of Clearwater
C3 t3litGt NAB. KEC'D
i
I !U'~ 1 0 2009
p1,.AldNING
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP AND SURVEY: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
^ PROVIDE A SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY
D. SIGN PLAN AND ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Sections 4-1008 and 4-202.A.23)
^ SIGN PLANS with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
_ All dimensions;
_ Size of site (in acreage and in square feet);
Bar scale and date prepared;
_ To-scale drawings in color, of all proposed signage (attached, freestanding, and directional signs), which include the following:
i. dimensions, with dimensional arrows;
ii. sign area in square feet;
iii. height and width of sign and sign structure, measured in feet;
iv. labels of all colors;
v. surface area of the sign proposed;
vi. text copy including the message of the sign;
vii. changeable copy, rf proposed; and
viii. describe any illumination including the type, placement, intensity, hours of illumination and system to automatically turn off lighting
when the business is closed, and sign area to be illuminated.
Color building elevations, to scale, for all facades of any building with proposed and existing attached signage;
Master sign plan for shopping centers and office parks, to include all signs;
_ Site data table, to include how all proposed signs (existing and new, name each one with a title) meet code requirements, with a calculation
worksheet; and
_ Number, type, location and surface area of all existing signs on the same property and or building on which the sign is to be located.
E. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-1008 8 Section 4-202)
^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
_ All dimensions;
_ North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
_ All required five-foot setbacks as measured from property line;
All existing and proposed points of access;
_ All required sight triangles;
_ Location of all public and private easements and street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks;
Lot frontage on all rights-of-way;
_ Location vrith labels of all freestanding (including directional) signs proposed and existing (indicate whether to be removed);
_ Location v~ith labels of all attached signs, proposed and existing (indicate whether to be removed);
Show all property lines;
_ Identification of water courses, wetlands, tree masses and specimen trees, including description and location of under story, ground cover
vegetation and wildlife habitats or other environmental unique areas;
_ Sight visibility triangles shown and labeled;
_ Location of all proposed landscape material including size and species;
Land areas expressed in square feet and acres; and
_ Location of the sign in relation to property lines, public rights-of-way, easements, buildings and other signs on the property.
Page 2 of 8-Comprehensive Sign Program Application -City of Clearwater
~ ~.~~~ 1 ~ 2009
i
p~.ANNtNG
F. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-1807.C)
Signage proposed as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program may deviate from the minimum sign standards in terms of numbers of signs per
business and/or parse/ of land, maximum area of sign face per parse! of land and the total area of sign faces per business or parse! of land,
subject to compliance with the flexibility criteria outlined below. As part of the program, a!! sign types shall be reviewed for the business and/or
the development parcel to achieve compliance in so far as possible with these current regulations. A master sign program for shopping
centers, including all out parcels, and office complexes shall include all types of signs for all tenants/uses within the development parcel.
These will be reviewed as a Comprehensive Sign Program application.
All existing and proposed signs must be architecturally integrated into the design of the building and/or site using similar and coordinated
design and style features, IrirrvArardaoial; /ia A~b~iY~d+~rssi~/b~/~o-l~i~/dr~-~I~OM~'P~~+~j'~~~
ercJfr~rrelr w~YnDplnObi~io~ra6a~IOO/~, orrrwi~dowR r}rq, awi~arrrara/irrat~~iserR.
^ Provide complete responses to the COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM CRITERIA including how the criteria are met:
1. Architectural Theme. How is the design, character, location and/or materials of all signs proposed in the comprehensive
sign program demonstrably more attractive than signs otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under
the minimum signs standards? Additionally, demonstrate how the proposed signage improves the community character.
Further, explain how all signs are architecturally integrated intofwith the design of the building and/or site using similar and
coordinated design features, materials and colors, etc.
internally lit and will sometimes vary per the size of the unit. All background elements of the center where
signs are posted are also uniform, the same material and color of building behind each sign provides some
2. Height. Describe how the height of all freestanding signs proposed through the Comprehensive Sign Program relate to
the design of the sign and not exceed 14 feet in height?
This factor is to code. There are no plans to alter the 2 exisiting free standing signs that the center uses.
3. Total Area of Sign Faces. Height, Area, Number and Location of Signs. The height, area, number and location of signs
permitted through the Comprehensive Sign Program shall be determined based on the criteria below.
Overall size of site: 878,605.00 SF (per property appraiser)
What is the distance in linear feet, from the building setback line to the sign location?.
What is the frontage in linear feet? 933' on McMullen 797' on SR 590 (both MOL)
What is the proposed use? same shopping center
What is the size of the buildings (in square feet) on site? 172,728 SF
How do pedestrians and motor vehicles access the site? 2 points on McMullen and 2 on SR 590
Describe pedestrian and motor vehicular site and roadway visibility zero. no visibility - or extremely limited for sorr
Describe the intended traffic circulation pattern: same as present
What is the hierarchy of signage? Not sure what this means? The 2 pole signs are really the only main vsiibility
4. Elimination of Unattractive Signage. How does the signage proposed result in the elimination of existing unattractive
signage or result in an improvement to the appearance of the parcel proposed for development in comparison to signs
otherwise permitted under the minimum sign standards?
signage visibility. It is presented in the same manner style and consistency as existing signage at the center.
Page 3 of d-Comprehensive Sign Program Application -City of Clearwater
C-RiGiN~-L R~C'D
i
t ~Ui~~ ~ ~a 2009
P~NNtNG
5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. If the signage proposed is located in the Downtown (D) or Tourist (T) district explain
how the proposed signage is consistent with the appropriate adopted design guidelines.
none here
Questions on the application? For any questions please call. the City of Clearwater Planning Department at 562-4567.
Page 4 of 8-Comprehensive Sign Program Application -City of Clearwater
Comprehensive Sign Program
Proposed Sign Summary
Provide all information please
Address Sign Type Height (ft)* Len th Width Area
or unit # * if freestanding (ft) (ft) (sq. tt)
Every single unit is listed individually
with a picture and the exact square footage
and the previously enclosed materials are
far more instructive, informational and
far better laid out than what this for
can provide.
o y
~ D~
n `
-~
o ~ IN
NO
_ n m
~ ~
O~
- m ~~
_ ~ °o C
~ or
D Nrn
-
z
~, o0
_~ O
O
D '~
T
Page 5 of 8-Comprehensive Sign Program Application -City of Clearwater
t~t~i'GINAL R~C'D
1JI~ ; ~ 2009
~ PLANNING
r^t" a "•r{:: W '. %
y ~•~
RR ~~!
0
l r- rr
.~~~'~
_J P
' _
_
-
~~•:
~.
•
~
Q
d
1
~ ~
.~..~ U
~~
Y
r •.-.'.
'
%
•'! - _
- - - -
. t-.~:
~..•-
- ~
h
-
~ r'•'•
r. i..: •,•ti %~[• it -- - _ -
•: r
5 .~ - -- - - -
'
~~p .. .
.
'
- -
-
^
.1. .t.
.r:
-
,fj
DR
' -
- -
W
H _
:F•: ::"
~
DR .•:;':;:::;~.;,;-.'.;fir;;?i~:_~~.c ~._
:•,•,~.r~:;,,,•% PROJECT - - - -
~ ~ .,air, -
SITE - - -
,•?'' (~'~t:' •~:i, :ir::! :~r .:~^ did:'. '.r{.
_ - _
.:•:':
:.:::`
58-590 ,
:'i~'.E+;~1FEi~I
? FIJPdr [lF2 N
7
`.• .
~_
~yp Rr
~'
z
~•-:. .
-- -
'ti'p -
-
•, r,' is t. ff ~.'r ' i
~ ~:
~•
( -
!
`
y~p~
Q['Z 4 gyp„"' ;•,;~: !:' j~.v;'r'-r;: ~: ~~•
! • -
-
~
f
~^
V
at~•~
ys
~.
P' ,
iJ
e~l
'.., 'e~.'.:ff
-' J•~ -
_
-
--
'
q
i
f-e
vC°
.
_
_
- -
::5
•
_
'^''l4 l ~ ~ ....
~ - - ..~!.-.: .- - y ~
~ _ _ _
~
. • 4
Ruth Eckerd Halt Dr I
_-' •.' ~Y- ~, phpey
..'%'..:::..::-,.' • ASE ~ ~9N
.'~G4~4_.,.,:`(k0.j~:..::%-:'! '~:~~~. SAtd ++. JOSE
LOCATION
Owner: Goral Tov, Ltd Case: APP2009-00002
Site: 1520 McMullen Booth Road Property Size: 20.17 acres
PIN: 09/29/16/84343/000/0010 Atlas Page: 274A
~
' ~ •
"
.~
'
0
~ N
~4 ~
~
11
-
~ ~
d
-
.
..
• '••' `Y,
'
5 '6
7 ( ,
.
:
c
I 2
1590 1580 -"~~~"' ='"'~~_'~
O L20736 ~ 1620
t •
'
~
'
zoo( .
~
.
. _
1570 _ ., :•~-:~:~•::::;..;.'.:_:
101 - -"' ~ 1fi25'-'~~~~
1560 -
SEE PLAT ~~IENSIONS
~~ 1610
~
Glir.:_..,..~,:.::
1550 : ic'~ :'•~..;':~i~~~; ; ~;:,`.
3p1~42
1540 1600
~ 84343 J
tt ~.
1530
401 X42
zoo - ." !$~:'•.::ii4:es_
1
5o>s'3s p
O
J
i;::'
_:': r
:'.':: ~ l'•:
~
1520 1500 ;
.
-
601-642
1510
IRT ••=~~~ ~::
--- ~:::
'
190 ,:
~ -. •~i'.::: ,:: ~~:-•_ :
- 1450
~ 02988 .~ 1426 -
ZONING
Owner: Goral Tov, Ltd Case: APP2009-00002
Site: 1520 McMullen Booth Road Property Size: 20.17 acres
PIN: 09/29/16/84343/000/0010 Atlas Page: 274A
~ SR 590 _ ...::............. .:.
~rJ
6 211( .~ o y
I
h z z ~-
O 20736
I 1620 .
.
.
.
L - -
•
.:
~-
207( :...-
1570 ` ~-' ~: .
101
~..;i:'~:; ?::.-
:;•
:`
`:
'~
~
'
1560 •:
,:
:
.
:
,
.. .. ..
'
SEE PLOT P~DII~NSIONS 1810 1~ [.4
.A
O '. iGf:: ;":.'C~;.•~"r
1550 m Y::i.:: ;•.: >'
14~::
.
.
~,
, '
,-.~_ _
.
..
.
.._ .
~^
301-342 .
.
,
.":
,
•.
W
'~
1540 ~':• •".r: -`,
1800 ~ ~}.i
r ~ _
~ is:r..•'c:':-•:^:.'~.~::::'._i'-
'
84343 fe;::-::: ~:•:.: :'.:-:
~:;.>::
'
r..:. ::~ ~,::,:.::
:
;~.t4¢5:;:~;:
~
~
''
'
401-442 1530 ~•
:'.~.:
r7e
es.
zoo ~'~'•1= "
~ ~.'.: 775'•
':.:~.14ff5
M:' '~
+@9Ds
501-$38 .
.
r.::
: ::
:
.
~`
~.
1520 1500 ~~:., ...r'.; ~... • :: ''
;.:
~
.
801-642 i';::•.-. ~':p:-.yM~
s
1510 `'" '+`
-
~ ° ~~
"- iso ~~ r~' "
~:.: ' 1450
.?.. ~
~~'~~
``e`
g 02 ,...,.,.
~.
: '
•`
.:
;
a3 988 ,•
r'•. ;
•
1428 .:
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES
Owner: Goral Tov, Ltd Case: APP2009-00002
Site: 1520 McMullen Booth Road Property Size: 20.17 acres
PIN: 09/29/16/84343/000/0010 Atlas Page: 274A
r4Y
i I~~~
I ~"j~
View from McMullen Booth Road of building facade to which
the sign to be attached. Large tree blocks view
~:
. ,. ~.
View of building facade from McMullen Booth Road when
almost due east from property. Full facade to which sign to be
attached now visible.
1520 McMullen Booth Road
APP2009-00002
View from southeast corner of property looking northwest at
building facade sign is to be attached.
Closer view from McMullen Booth Road looking at building
facade. Large tree still blocks most of facade view.