FLD2009-03014 - 1105 Druid Rd - Druid Road Assisted Living Facility - July 21, 2009
FLD2009-03014
1105 DRUID RD
D DID ROAD ASSISTED LIVING F C
PLANNER OF RECORD: MJJ
ATLAS # 296A
ZONING: HDR
LAND USE: RH
RECEIVED: 03/05/2009
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS:
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
CL W CoverSheet
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Owner:
Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
Julv 21, 2009
FLD2009-030 14
D.l.
lA. Churchill, LLC
Wedding & Stephenson Architects, Inc.
Randy Wedding
1105 Druid Road
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
CURRENT ZONING:
Flexible Development approval to permit a 112-bed assisted living
facility in the High Density Residential (HDR) District with a
reduction to the minimum off-street parking requirement from 71
spaces to 64 spaces, an increase to the building height from 30 feet to
53 feet (to flat roof), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25
feet to 20 feet (to pavement), a reduction in front (west) setback from
25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction in side (east) setback
from 10 to three feet (to pavement) and a reduction in side (south)
setback from 10 to three feet (to pavement) as a Residential Infill
Project, pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2-504.F;
and a reduction to a portion of the perimeter landscape buffer along
the east and south property lines from 10 feet to zero feet (to
pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan, pursuant to
Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G.
High Density Residential (HDR) District
REQUEST:
CURRENT FUTURE
LAND USE CATEGORY: Residential High (RH)
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use: Vacant
Proposed Use: Assisted Living Facility
EXISTING
SURROUNDING
ZONING AND USES:
North: High Density Residential (HDR) District
Attached Dwellings
South: High Density Residential (HDR) District
Attached Dwellings
East: High Density Residential (HDR) District
Attached Dwellings
West: Office (0) District
Funeral Home and Detached Dwellings
Community Development Board- July 21, 2009
FLD2009-030l4 - Page 1
ANAL YSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 1. 613 acres is located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Martin Luther King Jr.
Avenue and Druid Road. The site has 265.16 feet of frontage on both Druid Road and Martin
Luther King Jr. Avenue and is currently vacant.
Development Proposal:
On March 5, 2009 an application for a Residential Infill Project was submitted to develop the site
with a lOS-unit assisted living facility in a five-story building. The building is designed as an
"L" shape located in the southeast corner of the property with two wings extending north and
west. Units range from one-bedroom Alzheimer's units with 228 square feet of living area to
one-bedroom assisted living units with 555 square feet of living area. There are between 19 and
32 units per floor. The facility includes a kitchen, dining facilities, lounge, snack room, bar,
mechanical room, laundry facilities, locker room, offices, nurse's stations, and activity room.
The request is being processed as a Residential Infill Project due to the requested height increase,
parking and setback reductions. The proposal includes reduction to the required 71 off-street
parking spaces to 64 spaces, an increase to the building height from 30 feet to 53 feet (to flat
roof), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to pavement), a reduction in
front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction in side (east) setback from
10 to three feet (to pavement) and a reduction in side (south) setback from 10 to three feet (to
pavement).
The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the
Community Development Code (CD C) is discussed below.
Maximum Density: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-501.1, the maximum allowable density within
the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use category is 30 dwelling units per acre. As pursuant
to CDC Section 8-102 the allowable density for assisted living facilities is calculated at three
beds per dwelling unit. The subject property is 1.613 acres and therefore 145 beds are allowed.
As proposed, the development will have 112 beds, which meets the above requirement.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2.501.1, the maximum allowable ISR
within the RH Future Land Use Category is 0.85. As per the site data table, the proposal has an
ISR of 0.73, which meets the above requirement.
Minimum Lot Area I Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-503, the minimum lot area for assisted
living facilities is 15,000 square feet. The subject property is 70,304.70 square feet in area.
Pursuant to the same table, the minimum lot width for assisted living facilities is 150 feet. The
lot widths of this site along both Druid Road and Martin Luther King Avenue are 265.16 feet.
Based upon the above, the proposal is consistent with these Code provisions.
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-504, the maximum allowable height for
Residential Infill Projects is 130 feet. The proposal includes an increase to the maximum
building height from 30 to 53 feet (to roof deck), providing for five floors of residential units.
As a Flexible Development use, the Code provides a building height range from 30 to 130 feet
Community Development Board- July 21, 2009
FLD2009-03014 - Page 2
for attached dwellings. The property to the north across Druid Road is developed with a 12-story
residential building. The property to the south and east is developed with an attached dwelling
complex of two-story buildings. The property farther to the southeast has been redeveloped as
the Renaissance Square attached dwelling complex (formerly the Sunshine Mall) with buildings
up to four and five stories in height. While the proposed height is greater than that of the existing
adjacent residential buildings to the east and south, the proposed height is less than the maximum
height that would otherwise be allowable for other uses in the zoning district and can be viewed
as transitioning the height between the building to the north and the buildings to the south and
east. The proposed building height will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, density and character
of adjacent properties. Flexibility in regard to building height is justified by the benefits of a
well-designed building that is compatible with the surrounding character.
Minimum Setbacks: As this property fronts two rights-of-way, the property has two front (north
and west) setbacks and two side (east and south) setbacks. Pursuant to CDC Table 2-504, the
minimum front setback for residential infill projects may range between 10 and 25 feet and the
minimum side setback may range between zero and 10 feet. The proposed building exceeds the
required front setback of 25 feet, being located 32 feet from the Druid Road front property line
and 45 feet from the Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue front property line. The proposed building
also meets or exceeds the required side setback of 10 feet, being located 12 feet from the east
property line and 10 feet from the south property line. The proposal includes a front setback
reduction along Druid Road to 20 feet to the pavement of the parking area along the north side of
the property, and a front setback reduction along Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue to 15 feet to the
pavement of the parking area along the west side of the property. These setbacks to pavement
are common for new developments (whether residential or nomesidential). The other setback
reductions are for paved areas along the east and south property lines. These areas will be used
as clear access pathways as well as recreation areas for the residents. Locating this area between
the rear of the building and existing six foot wall along the property lines provides increased
privacy and security for the residents. This type of outdoor amenity is typical of assisted living
facilities.
The requested flexibility in regard to required setbacks are justified by the benefits of the
building exceeding required setbacks allowing for significant landscaped areas along the
roadways, enhancing the surrounding area. The development of this parcel may be viewed as
otherwise impractical without the requested deviations from the required setbacks, wherein all
setback reductions are to non-building structures. Additionally, the design of this project creates
an interesting building form and function which will enhance the character of the surrounding
area, and which breaks up the scale and massing of the building.
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-504, the development standards for
residential infill projects are guidelines that may be varied based upon the flexibility criteria
specified for residential infill projects. These development standards also set forth a minimum
off-street parking requirement of two spaces per unit. However, this requirement is not
consistent with the intended use as pursuant to CDC Section 8-102 where a dwelling unit is
defined as a building or portion of a building providing independent living facilities for one
family including provision for living, sleeping, and complete kitchen facilities. The proposed
Community Development Board- July 21,2009
FLD2009-03014 - Page 3
units do not contain complete kitchen facilities and therefore do not provide independent living
facilities.
As the aforementioned provision is not consistent with the intended use, CDC Section 2-503 in
which the development standards for assisted living facilities set forth minimum off-street
parking requirement of one space per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area, was used to
establish the minimum off-street parking requirement. Under this provision, a minimum of 71
parking spaces are required. The applicant requested a reduction from 71 parking spaces to 64
spaces and provided a parking demand study, which was reviewed and approved by the Traffic
Operations Division that reflected 71 spaces would be excessive and that 64 spaces are adequate
given the study showed historically assisted living facilities generate far less traffic than that
which would require one parking space per two residents.
It is further noted that, pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, the IlllnlIllum off-street parking
requirement for assisted living facilities within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District
is one parking space per two residents. As 112 beds are proposed, this parking calculation would
result in 56 parking spaces required. While this provision is applicable in the MDR District, this
standard is more in-line with the development proposed as it is anticipated that a majority of the
residents will not be capable of operating a motor vehicle. In addition, the facility will house
approximately 20 Alzheimer's patients that are unable to operate motor vehicles.
Based on the above, staff feels the 64 spaces to be provided will be adequate for the needs of the
facility and will be more beneficial to the community character.
Residential Infill Proiects Flexibility Criteria: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-504, the uses allowed
within the High Density Residential (HDR) District are subject to compliance with specific
flexibility criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with
these flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-504.F (Residential Infill Projects):
L The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following:
intensity; other development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill
project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent lands uses.
Consistent
X
Inconsistent
X
X
X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for developmeI1.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are X
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Building
height, may only exceed 80 feet, however, if the parcel proposed for development
fronts on Clearwater Bay, Old Tampa Bay, or is only separated from Clearwater Bay
or Old Tampa Bav bv a public open space.
Community Development Board- July 21, 2009
FLD2009-03014 - Page 4
Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.l, where attached dwellings and like uses are
adjacent to arterial or collector rights-of-way, a IS-foot landscape buffer with one tree every 35
feet and 100 percent shrubs is required. The north and west buffers will contain the trees and
shrub material required by Code. In addition, 30 of the shade trees provided will have calipers
exceeding minimum requirements and 11 palm trees not required by Code will be provided. The
increase in tree size coupled with excess palms will provide increased shade for the parking lot
and building as well as provide additional visual buffering of the building from the adjacent
rights-of-way. Furthermore, the proposed landscape will have a beneficial impact on the
surrounding properties and will enhance the community character as the site is currently vacant
and the adjacent properties lack perimeter landscape buffering.
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.l, where adjacent to other attached dwellings and/or like
uses, a lO-foot perimeter landscape buffer is required. The proposal seeks a reduction in the tree
and shrub requirement for a portion of these buffers (south and east) to provide a paved area for
the residents of the facility. As previously discussed, locating this area to the rear of the building,
where there is an existing six-foot high wall along the property lines, provides increased safety
for the residents. This type of outdoor amenity with increased security is typical of assisted
living facilities.
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.0, the landscaping
requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a
Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with those criteria:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. Architectural theme: The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape X
treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under
the minimum landscape standards.
2. Architectural theme: The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape X
treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under
the minimum landscape standards.
3. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program IS
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
N/A
N/A
4. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
5. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program X
will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
6. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive
landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of
Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area In which the parcel proposed for
development is located.
N/A
N/A
The proposal has been found to be consistent with the above requirements, but specifically with
regard to criterion l.b, the use and size of the proposed side (east and south) perimeter landscape
buffers makes it impossible to plant the shade trees and 100 percent shrubs required by code.
Community Development Board- July 21, 2009
FLD2009-03014 - Page 5
Small portions of the buffers lack shrubs and trees in order to provide clear recreation areas and
access paths. It is staff s recommendation though that of the three magnolia trees proposed at the
northeast comer the center magnolia be shifted south approximately 45 feet in order to create a
more complete buffer and allow the future canopy of these trees to be more full.
As expressed above, the Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent
with all applicable criteria. Therefore, subject to the attached conditions of approval being
addressed, positive findings can be made with regard to the proposed Comprehensive Landscape
Program.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There is one outstanding gate and overgrown vegetation Code
Enforcement issue associated with the subject property.
COMPLIANCE 'WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and
criteria as per CDC Sections 2-501.1 and 2-504:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Floor Area Ratio 0.60 0.22 X
Impervious Surface Ratio 0.85 0.73 X
Minimum Lot Area 15,000 square feet 70,304.7 square feet X
Minimum Lot Width 150 feet 26516 feet (along Druid Road) X
265.16 feet (along MLK Avenue) X
Maximum Building Height 30 feet 53 feet Xl
Minimum Setbacks Front: 25 feet North: 20 feet (to pavement) X2
35 feet (to building) X
West: 15 feet (to pavement) X2
45 feet (to building) X
Side: 10 feet South: 3 feet (to pavement) X2
10 feet (to building) X
East: 3 feet (to pavement) X2
12 feet (to building) X
Minimum Off-Street 71 parking spaces 64 parking spaces X'
Parkin!! (1/1,000 GFA)
See above discussion with regard to Maximum Building Height.
See above discussion with regard to Minimum Setbacks.
See above discussion with regard to Minimum Off-Street Parking.
Community Development Board- July 21, 2009
FLD2009-03014 - Page 6
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913.A:
Consistent
I. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
Inconsistent
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of May 07, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to
move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB).
Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the
applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial
competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the subject 1.613 acres are zoned High Density Residential (HDR) District and are
located at the southeast comer of Druid Road and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue;
2. That the site is currently vacant;
3. That based on current Land Use Category density limitations of 30 assisted living facility
dwelling units per acre, the subject site may be redeveloped with a maximum of 145 beds
(three beds per dwelling unit), which is 33 more than the proposal of 112 beds;
4. That the property to the north across Druid Road is developed with attached dwellings 12
stories in height, and the properties to the south and east are developed with attached
dwellings 2 stories in height;
5. That the property farther to the southeast has been redeveloped as the Renaissance Square
attached dwelling complex (formerly Sunshine Mall) with buildings up to four and five
stories in height;
6. That the building proposed is designed to be 53 feet in height, providing for five floors of
assisted living facility units;
7. That in the HDR District, required setbacks for a Residential Infill Project use are 10 - 25
feet front and 0 - 10 feet side;
8. That the proposed building meets required setbacks;
9. That the proposal includes a reduction to the front (north) setback along Druid Road from 25
feet to 20 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along Martin Luther
King Jr. Avenue from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback
Community Development Board- July 21,2009
FLD2009-03014 - Page 7
10. from 10 feet to three feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10
feet to three feet (to pavement); and
11. That this site requires 15-foot perimeter landscape buffers along arterial or collector rights-of-
way and 10-foot wide perimeter landscape buffers adjacent to attached dwellings or like uses.
The perimeter landscape buffers along the north and west property lines, which abut collector
rights-of-way, meet the requirement. This proposal includes reductions to the perimeter
buffers along the east and south property lines, which abut attached dwellings, from lO feet to
zero feet (to pavement).
Conclusions of Law. The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches
the following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Standards as per
Tables 2-501.1 and 2-504;
2. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Flexibility
criteria for a Residential Infill Project as per CDC Section 2-504.F;
3. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913.A; and
4. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program criteria as per CDC Section 3-1202.G.
Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROV AL of the Flexible
Development approval to permit a 112-bed assisted living facility in the High Density
Residential (HDR) District with a reduction to the minimum off-street parking requirement from
71 spaces to 64 spaces, an increase to the building height from 30 feet to 53 feet (to flat roof), a
reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to pavement), a reduction in front
(west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction in side (east) setback from 10 to
three feet (to pavement) and a reduction in side (south) setback from 10 to three feet (to
pavement) as a Residential Infill Project, pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2-
504.F; and a reduction to a portion of the perimeter landscape buffer along the east and south
property lines from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Landscape
Plan, pursuant to Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by
the CDB;
2. That prior to issuance of any building permits, all solid waste conditions shall be addressed;
3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the landscape plans shall be revised to
depict the relocation of the center magnolia tree of the three proposed at the northeast comer
of the property southward 45 feet;
4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground;
5. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans shall be revised to reflect a
parapet height of four feet.
Community Development Board- July 21, 2009
FLD2009-03014 - Page 8
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
A 1'1' ACHMEN1'S: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding UsesMap; and Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S IPlannlng DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIDmid Road I 105 Assisted Living Facility (HDR) - 7.2 I. 09
CDB - MJJ\Staff Report 2009 06-1 9. doc
Community Development Board- July 21, 2009
FLD2009-03014 - Page 9
Matthew Jackson
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727) 562-4836
ma tthew. i ackson(a),mvcl ea "va ter .co m
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
o Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 2008 to Present
Regulate growth and development of the City In accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and
variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of
development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning
assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning
ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review
committees, boards, and meetings.
o Planner I
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to December 2007
Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances.
In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained
submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approvaL Schedule and lead
project kick-off meetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting
documents and make site visits as welL Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject
matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs.
Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made
disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities.
o Manager
Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004
Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment
complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and
inventory controL Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and
delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing
and special events.
o Linguist
US Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995
Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military
readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering
operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian
authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison
between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training.
EDUCATION
o Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007
o Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004
Community Development Board- July 21, 2009
FLD2009-03014 - Page 10
.....
""""""
I tjQ ~ ;~ [JO . ~~i[01L:9~;
- z ~ GOULD ST- I~i lH
Df~ ~ : ~ ~.,-~ ~~A~
~ -7' j olia U8-19ALT'[ """"" "'''''' I{~ r-:=:r .
[ ... . ., J~[_ ---M=~ II
~~8[.,-1~~[]';rn ID
DRUID RD I' - - ~ ORUIO RIII
-- J D D 0 - CJ~[ -_...J m
D.r . JASMWE WAY 'fP~ ir, JASMINE (; WAY
t D D C ~~.<>~' ~ ]" ]/
MAGNOlIA OR 4,r!F/ MAGNOLIA OR
.. LJ D~D lJil I!
J ("'""J 0 I PAn< J il ""U' PAm...J I ,
JEFFORDS ST JEFF
' CJ 0-0.. ~D~iJ
I;j GRAND CENTRAL
~D D I 1 D_j
PINELlAS _
~~~6 Bf~~
V~w
LOCATION
A
Sf
I
Owner: J.A. Churchill, llC.
I Case: FLD2009-030J 4
Property Size: J .6 acres
--r Atlas Page: ------296/...---
Site: 1105 E Druid Road
--. - ---._-"-
PIN: 15/29/ J 5/00000/340/0300
AERIAL
Owner: J.A. Churchill, LLC.
Case:
FLD2009-030 14
Site: 1105 E Druid Road
PIN: 15/29/15/00000/340/0300
Property Size:
Atlas Page:
1 .6 acres
296A
-
T
I ~ ~ I - I
PINE ST
r ~ ~ I ~, I 611
:;:
'"
'"
.;;
~l
-I
I
I ~ ~
I
I
\I;~.~
1HIL '.l1
gl
-I
1
Il I
I
-
S!
13 14
15 1 16
I
e
~
~
16 25 24
I
23 n 21 20", I
~ ~I
. 708
19116 'W
I I
, I i~~
I ~ I ~
~ I -
~~ U
'" ...
;; ;;;
;1~ ~
"'- .-
~
..
"""" 8'
'" .... ~ (t'
8/)1 ~I ~ 6
1 I
I, I 2 3 . 7 5r 1 ~
~ I
fL- '0( 41 :tJJf
1 Cl
fi'- ~ 5r 6_.....7 -h6 8 ;~~ !
I III a _6~ ... I 8 ;
~ ~ ~ - ~ S! ~ j
'-
EJJftDR II
r-
I ~I~~~fi ~Il Q
I I 0: 00
,
I 12 11 10 9
Ir 903 17 16
q 14 !9,~
l- 15 16 0 <( 0~ ~
t': --=::
S r3 '" ~~ ., ~~ ~l ...
~ ~ ~
fL-
.-
il
f 1~~@1 ..,
-,
~--
- ~ :/4- 1-'-' 2
- l.Jo 1181 _ 1.. -LlX!!.
- 113.E /'Jr ~I " .
- ~ 1006
- - - -1;- 1~'1: "8--
1 u_-
Owner: J.A. Churchill, LLC.
Site:
...... -0- _.___..____..._. _____
1105 E Druid Road
PIN:
15/29/15/0??oo/340/0300
,.....
v ~~ (: 2 : 3 : 4 : 5 : 6 :
lIDO ~
- - - r - I-- -~: - 4 - 1
1 '" '2 I 11 I 10 I 9 ' 8 I 7 1
- - - J I 1 I I I I
2 , . .
- - - - I 22 I PINE ST S
3 I I I I I
----'tk,1 I I : : I I
- - ~ _I ~ " 20 I 19 I 1e I 17 I 16 I 15
5 r- ,- -; - I - rT ;- -='1- -I -
- - - -f 7 I 8 9 I I ,55764 'I 13 I
8 I L-.I- --I- ---" I
- 6 I I I 1 10 I 11 I 12 I I 14
Ii!
i;l
"
.
~ -
lU\jFf' It ~
I~ ~ ~ ~
~ i
'--
--..
20 I 19 1tl
0"'''' I
C'It r.,.
;::: ;::: I
;'j DRUID RD
II :l
~'. .~ ~ ~ !>3&.C"
~ -
HDR
~
~
~
~
~fe
901
N YORK CIR ,,~
-I.o~:f"
~
.~
,
~
( '\
ZONING
Case:
FLD2009-030 14
11e
1108
1112
r-
--.-.--- ..
Property Size:
1.6 acres
Atlas Page:
296A
-
t 50
I
11
'-~
I Cl
1'-~
I II.l
f1-
r-
I
I
1
I
....
J.
~
E
'-
r
-
1-
-
-
-
Owner:
Site:
PIN:
I .. I .. ,..,. I I 611 1/ ,( I I I I I
.. "b 11213141516:
g .l10.!!. - r - I- - ~ - ~ - 1
.. ~I I of> ~:
~ .. I 1 12 I 11 I 10 I 9 I 8 I 7 I
I - - - I I I I I I I
2 I . . . .
- - - - I 22 I PINE ST S
3 I I 1 I
- - - - I I 21 1
_ _ ~ _I ~ 1 20 :
5 r 1_1- - "1
---~7'8'91
~ 6 I I : I
I
'''I''''''
PINE ST
I
'"
..
0>
....
..
0>
8
..
...
SI
..
J
I
12 I 13
I
..
I~
I
I
9 I 10
14
15 I 16
I
7
8
~
o:::::?
I
2~1
~I
19118
I
I
I~
o
,"
708
I 71~
17
I
I 712
714
I~
o
I" 45
11
6
25
21
24
~
..
23
'"
..
0>
~~ ~!
~ ;'IS 8
0) C)~ ~
<0
S
..
g
801
Q'
~I
800
802 ~
'<(
~
ti'
~
Bi
i!:
:::l
....
o ~
W J;;;;
.. 0::
~ ~
'A
s g
o 0
.. ..
6
I
2 I 3
5r 6_ _7 -h8
&176~ :3: ,<0
.. ~ ~ ~
5 r 14
41 ~!1
8 '"
~ ~;~1;
.. ~ ~ ~
4
7
JASMINE WA Y
l::!
~~
12
91.l!lo
<i 14
~
10
~ 8 t
~ ~ 19
9 T
I 45
0. 90
18
19 I ~04
~11
11
17
15
16 Q ,I
q:a: 0. 90
~~ @I ~ 45
S13 '" ~~ CIQ
o S 00 S
... "","""' "'" ,...
MAGNOLIA DR
r;' -Z.\'ll. I 'S iSl ~ 1_
~ 2;~ 1""""1 'P=" -
- ~ 'J,.; _ I I 2
_2L 221 ~ 1181 - 1.. 1904....
~ 26 21 1_ 19 1'7 4
~ 2.7 I ~ ~I ..: .lOO.!.
_ _ _2B _ I' ~vA' 6
29 ... I 7 .___
lil
I I I I
I I I I
19 I 18 I 17 I 16 15
-------'-
rr -,- -,' I
Ll57~ -11 13 I
10 I 11 I 12 I I 14
M
W
DRUID RD
:;l ill
60
"60.1. ~
..
..
..
..
'"
..
..
538.4
W
~
i
265.16
901
N YORK CIR
CJ,fl.
Ofl.'f-
~-t
.').
,p".
lil
"
m
50
(
~
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES
J.A. Churchill. LLC.
1105 E Druid Road
15/29/15/00000/340/0300
Case:
FLD2009-03014
Property Size:
1.6 acres
Atlas Page:
296A
~-
!'rf-
W~..~~
~ ~
, ,
30
'--
60
I -'i.4),
20 19 18
I ~ ~ I
I .. ~ I
ill
~
1110
1108
1112
.-
View from northwest comer of property looking east.
View from north property line looking south.
View from north property line looking south.
..../~'/.---.....
h---~ - >
View from northwest corner of property looking southeast
View from north property line looking southeast.
View from north property line looking southwest.
1105 Druid Road
FLD2009-03014
Wedding
MEMO
TO:
MATTHEW JACKSON, AICP
PLANNER
CITY OF CLEARWATER
C.RANDOLPH WEDDING, F AlA
1105 DRUID ROAD
RESPONSE TO CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH
FLD2009-03014 DATED 5/26/09
6/11/09
FROM:
RE:
SUBJ:
DATE:
GOOD MORNING-
HERE FOLLOWS OUR RESPONSE TO THE CONDITIONS CITED IN YOUR
LATEST REPORT:
ENGINEERING:
PRIOR TO CBD:
1- CORRECTED IN PRIOR RESPONSE. NOW IN COMPLIANCE..
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
1- WE WILL SUPPLY A DOUBLE SWEEP CLEAN-OUT AS
REQUESTED.
2- THE FDC IS NOW PROPEERL Y SPACED A MINIMUM OF 25'
FROM THE FACE OF THE BUILDING.
PRIOR TO C.O.:
1- WE WILL REPAIR/REPLACE THE SIDEWALK AS REQUESTED
2- WE WILL SUPPLY 5 SETS OF AS-BUlL T DRAWINGS AS
REQUESTED
3- WE WILL PROVIDE EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER OVER UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES AS
REQUESTED.
Wedding + Stephenson, Architects, Inc. 300 First Avenue S., Suite 402 . St. Petersburg, Florida 3370]
PROF REG #AA -0002922 (727) 821-6610 www.weddingarchitects.com FAX: (727)894-4216
Wedding ~
1105 DRUID ROAD
PAGE TWO
GENERAL NOTES
1- WE WILL DESIGN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM UTILIZING THE
AVAILABLE RECLAIMED WATER.
2- ANY REQUIRED MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING
INFRASTRUCTURE WILL BE AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE.
WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS WERE INSTALLED UNDER
PREVIOUS PROJECT AND WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THIS
BUILDING
3- WE WILL RESPOND TO ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
RESULTING FROM THE DRC REVIEW.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
1- NO RESPONSE REQUIRED
FIRE CONDITION:
1- FDC HAS BEEN BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 25' FROM FACE
OF BUILDING
2- FIRE PUMP ROOM LOCATION IS SHOWN ON SHET B-2.!.
3- A NFP A 13 WET STANDPIPE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM
WILL BE SUPPLIED
4- FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS AND PUMP SIZING SUPPLIED
AND ATTACHED.
LANDSCAPE:
1- COMPLETE REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN SUPPLIED WITH
COMP, LANDSCAPE FORMS ATTACHED.
LAND RESOURCE CONDITION:
1- WE WILL CONTINUE TO OVER-SUPPLY TREE INCHES AND
REVISE TREE REMOVAL SCHEDULE
2- WE WILL PROVIDE A PROTECTION PLAN FOR
TRANSLOCATION AT THAT SPOT.
3- WE WILL ELIMINATE ROOT PRUINING AT 13" OAK
PREVIOUSL Y PERFORMED.
4- WE WILL REMOVE THE 21" OAK AT THE SW. CORNER OF
THE SITE.
Wedding ~
1105 DRUID ROAD
PAGE THREE
PARKS + RECS CONDITION
1- WE WILL CONTACT CHRIS HUBBARD CONCERNING THE
PUBLIC ARTS FEE.
2- WE ARE PLEASED THAT THE P + R FEES HAVE BEEN
EARNING INTEREST SINCE PAID BY THE PRIOR PROJECT.
STORM WATER:
1- STORM CALCULATIONS AND ADDITIONAL
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
AND DATA ARE ATTACHED.
2- SWIFTMUD PERMIT. PERMIT WILL BE AVAILABLE TO
SUBMIT WITH CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
3- WE PROVIDED ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE PORTS
4- MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WAS SIGNED BY THE OWNER
AND DELIVERED AT THE DRC MEETING.
5- WE WILL QUICKLY RESPOND TO ANY ADDITIONAL
COMMENTS GENERATED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING
PERMIT APPLICATION.
SOLID WASTE
1- SEE SHEET B-2,1 FOR COMPACTOR LOCATION
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING:
I-APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS HE IS TO PAY FOR RELOCATION
OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER.
2-APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES ARE
DUE PRIOR TO C.O.
ZONING:
I-THE CORRECT ADDRESS IS THE MIDNIGHT PASS ROAD
ADDRESS. THE RECORDS @ DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
HAVE BEEN CORRECTED.
2- AS TO CRITERIA # 2-
THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A VERY PASSIVE, BUT
HANDSOME ADDITION TO THIS MIXED USE
NEIGHBORHOOD. IT WILL PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT FOR
,." I . .
Wedding ~
. PEOPLE, SOME OF WHOM MAY CHOOSE TO LIVE IN THE
RENTAL APARTMENTS TO THE SOUTH. IT WILL PROVIDE
1105 DRUID ROAD
PAGE FOUR
A CUSTOMER BASE FOR THE DOCTOR'S OFFICES,
FUNERAL HOME AND OTHER SERVICE BUSINESSES IN
THE AREA ALL OF WHICH WILL ENHANCE THE CASH
FLOW AND STABILITY OF THESE PROPERTIES AND
IMPROVE THEIR VALUE.
IT PROVIDES A TRANSITIONAL USE BETWEEN THE HIGH
RISE TO THE NORTH AND THE LOWER BUILDINGS TO
THE SOUTH AND WEST.
1- RESPONSES TO SECTION 2-503.A ARE SUPPLIED HEREWITH
2- WE ARE UNABLE TO SURF ACE ANY NEIGHBOHOOD
CONCERNS TO DATE.
3- A REVISED SITE PLAN ADDRESSING SETBACKS IS
ATTACHED. EXHIBIT 'F' REQUESTS MODIFICATION TO
SET ACKS AS PERMITTED IN FLEX INFILL.
4- DUMPSTER DETAILS ARE PROVIDED HEREWITH.
5- ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN ON SUBMITTED DRAWINGS AND
NOTED WTH COLORS SELECTED.
6- COLOR CHIPS ARE ATTACHED.
7- WALL IS 6'HIGH AND WILL BE PAINTED TO BLEND WITH
THE BUILDING PALETTE.
8- ALL SITE UTILITIES WILL BE UNDERGROUND
9- ALL EXTERIOR HV AC EQUIPMENT WILL BE LOCATED ON
THE ROOF.
10- SEE REVISED SHEET B-2.1.
11- SEE REVISED PLAN ATTACHED.
12-FENCE MATERIAL IS MODIFIED TO BE P-V-C, WHITE, AND
BE 6' BOARD-ON-BOARD DESIGN.
13- REVISED SITE PLAN CORRECTS ISSUES WITH PLANTING
ISLANDS + REQUIRED DISTANCE FROM ADJACENT
IMPERVIOUS SURFACES.
THANKS
BEST REGARDS,
~~\VIi~DIN~~ ;:IA
-
t'.
~ '
06/19/2009 10:16 Hedding + Stephenson Architects
(FAX)727 894 4216
P .002/003
"'
Clearwater
.~
~'--/
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
ff:-I'-l':) .-:~, (rs-;':;"l~l f\il ~ :-.:-\.'
I .-., ~ l:. G. I :
;! i<,'~~"'~~''''''~''~''~~_.~~'':~:v'', ',.,'... '_.""'-~_ .,,,
Ii r 'I;
r i; :! JUN 1 8 2009
....1 ~.,.: ~
Q SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
Q SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
Q SUBMIT FIRE PREll MARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
Q SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
[;=t/~:':"'()~~\->:~~~' Ji.""~;V~C~:f, .j ,;4~ -
CiTY ,:y;: GLEf.;:l\',X: ::::':j
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Residential Infill Project
(Revised 06/15/09\
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
Us! All owners on the deed
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
-J..-A"--Chm.chi1l)-LLC-(l..--A...-.Flo.tte.r.on.,._Manag.ing_pa_l;.tne_r..)_____________
__~.l..21.l1idnigh t X?.;?_~ Roa<;t...._Sara_sQ_t_a..._FLl421f.L______________________.___._.
_ (516) ~ 7-:-11.46_________ FAX NUMBER:_(2.4JJ___J4.Q=~9.:i7_____________._.__.______
~___.____________________ EMAIL .J~f8191~erizq~~t _.__________.___
~--~-~~------~~-~----------_._.__._--------_.-----_._---.---------..---.---
l- __J.......A~..filUrr hi 11, LLC._.___._.__. ______________________ _.______.
1______.._.____._.____.__.__._..___.____.______.._..______._____ ____.__________
_.Wed_~_in~~_~:~phe~~_~~_~::..~~~~_~~~~~_~~=:___.__.._______.____________.____
_.J.QO Fir:.~t.__Aven~.....s_Q!lt~SUi1:e._ltQ2._-S.t..-.Eetersburg..,.. -EL3.3JDL-------.---._
(7 2 7 L_.!!~.!..::.~&.HL_.______ FAX NUMBER: ___..._C7_2Jl..8..94-4211i_____________
~_( 7z!.1_448-73_~~___.__ ___ EMAIL: J;~nj.y:@we_dd!_!!K?.!ch~ tect~om.__.__.__..
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMA TJON: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME:
STREET ADDRESS
PARCEL NUMBER(S):
PARCEL SIZE (acres):
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PROPOSED USE(S):
Druid Road Assisted Living Facilie~OJECTVALUATION: -..!-.8_.JlllQ.JlOJ1..J)~____
1105 E. Druid Road, Clearwater, FL
15/29/ l'jjOOOOo /340 j30Q._____________
1.~~ acr~___~_____.__ PARCEL SIZE (square feet): ___LQ..J04 SF
SeELExhib.i~~_'__at t~ r h pi! ...here.ta..
Assisted livin& for the elder!Y______
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Specifically identify the request
(include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
A....l12:b.e.d--(.108-uui.t+--eld.er-car-e-....facll;i.t.y~i_n-_a_5__s.w:r-y--.~.---.--
bl1ildJ]!&._Ri.tlL7J.......61JL_s-Q_uar.eJ..eaLu:LID7.AC-sp.ac ~ Rr.>Q11E' s t ____
a builc!!!!g_nh~J:gh t ...Q.L 53_~ plusl~_u~X9-.P-~L_e.l eYa.t..Qr_____
pen_~~~us~~______..______.m_~._______________.._
C:\Documenll> and Sehin!l,lde",k.rel\lUSonlDesldop\j>lannlng depl fOfTTlS 0706\Resi<lentlaJ Innn ProjBot (Fill) 2000 07-11.doc
Page 1 of8
~
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR). A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES -L NO _ Qf yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
c. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
ag- SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page?) See Warranty Deed attached- 'B' .
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
IX Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk. coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
Tn?> prp,do1f~ly ::IpproV:I?n lnd1nin8 for rl1i~ ~;r-P T"~C: nppmpn to hp ~ 800(1
r-r~n~irioTI::Il el.emen.t~yiTl8 hphJPen rhp hignric:e ("In r-hp north ::Inn ? ~r-ory
bu:I..ldings to the south. See Exhibit "F" concerning l'lp.r h::lC'kl'l
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
The addit:ion of this loSlL.-in.t.Bnsit..y Tf>sidp.ntial llse Rill he in hRrmony wirh
rhe orhpr rf>sinpnri::ll ll~P in rhp npir;hhorhoofl ::Inn shonlrl !'d[';n;fir~TIr1y
enhance the value of adjacent properties.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The addit:I..on of an early stage geriatric health care facility will provide
opportllnites for others in the vi cini ty to Tem;:J;n nf>ar their Cl1Trp.nt:
surroundings as they age ;:!TIn Tequire Rnnition::ll sp.rvicps.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The prnpoBeollse' (AT.F)~enerR.tp.s ;:In e-xtn~mely low volllme of trRffic, dup. to
significantly redl1r.po RllrO mJ1lf>rship. RVf>rRE>;f' R[';e or TPS;np.nr (7')+) .<Inn
---p4=O",rision of facili.ty van/bus transportation for residents.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development
T.yine sonrh ::Irross Drnirl ROM'! from :'In p-xisirn['; 14 ~rnry p1npr1y projprr~
rhis "i STory hn;lrlin['; will :1C'r :1~ ;::J eoorl rr::lns;rioTI::Il f1<':P for rhp OTIP ;::Jnn
_t:Yo--S.tory TPS; nPTI ri.<11 f1~PC: to r}--tp E'<" c:r clnd C:OIl tl-)
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, induding visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. on
adjacent properties.
This is ~n extremely p~ggi,re use. It would be difficult to find a development
rhat wOlll d r::lllSe 1 f'SS .<1rlvp.rsp pffprr~ on rhi ~ TIP; ehhnrhoon
C:\Documents and SettingS\derekJerguson\DesktoP\planningforms_0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc
Page 2 of 8
06119/2009 10:16 Hedding + Stephenson Architects
(FAX)727 8944216
P .003/003
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residentiallnfill Project Criteria)
o Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
Assisted livinQ facilities carry an artificial 35' heiqht restriction in Clearwater, and
the impervious surface ratio cannot be achieved with a 3 story structure.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value or aomu. 'll
properties. (Include the existino vall.p. ofthA ,,-ilp. "nrl thp nrnnn"-P.rJ v"'ue of the site with the improvements.)
Fair market value of adiacent property will be increased as the vacant land is
upqraded and additional customers and tenants are brouqht to neiQhborinq
Businesses.
3. The uses within the residential jnlill project are otherwise pennitted in the City of Clearwater.
Assisted livinq units and associated dininq and amenities are a permitted use in
Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
The very passive use is totally compatible with adiacent uses (Funeral home,
elderly apartments, qarden apartments. Dr. 's offices.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vidnity of the parcel proposed
for development.
This vacant and mostly disturbed sit (from previously approved proiect activitv) is
an eyesore for the neiQhborhood. This infill project will act to upQrade and
increase the value of adiacent properties.
.._-_._-----_.~.~-----------_..-._--_._-_._--_...._-----.----------.- ....----....--...--------.---.-.-----
6. The design ofthe proposed residential infill project creales a fonm and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Actinq as a desiqned backdrop for the intersection of MLK and Druid the
. Sheltering arm' of this buildinq is a siQnificant improvement for both automobile
viewing and pedestrians impactinq both the immediate vicinity and travel throuqh
Clearwater.
7. Flexibility in regand to lot widlh. required setbacks, heighl and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community charaderamd!he
immediate vicinity oHM parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The flexibility requested in equal to or less than the adiustment previously
approved for this site. while the intended use is much less intensive in activity
and traffic generation.
r. ~.=-. .-. ~ ......., n \\7 IS . ",
. ' 1 i t~ It; :_,~ L V Lt i
C:lDoaJrnento and S9Itings1darek.ferguson\Desktoplplanning clap! forms 0708\Resiclantiallnr~1 Projad (FlDJ 2008 07.11.doc' _.~~. ~ .~~ .
Page 3 of 8 ,....\
,I
JUN 1 8 2009
~': ::.{.:.....)r::~_;~ ',:: (:- J~_:':..~;~G:;f;.
~,
CITy' ()F CLEi\'l'~',Y Sh ,
- .. ,.~'- -,.... .............
E.
STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteric
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
A STORMWA TER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stonnwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Cle3lwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. Draina"ge plan applied"
~
o
o
IX
Ql:
tX
Of
Q(
Qj::
Q(
At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading induding finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detentionfretenlion area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;"
A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City man"uat
Proposed storrnwater detentionfretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
]0
COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWA TER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
-~
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION _ IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
Ql SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (induding legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
l1! TREE SURVEY (induding existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
o TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees; No trees remain on site"
or LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
Q[ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in detenmining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved; See Exhibit 1 C' attached"
ex: GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided): N I A
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; N/ A
C:\Documents and SettingS\derekJerguson\DesktoP\planningfonns_0707\COmprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04--24-07.doc
Page 4 of 8
4 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36'):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
_lC
--X-
~
N/A
~
J-
~
J:-
~
N1A
J-
X
X
X
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feel), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISllNG buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
N1A
-X- Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines. manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
-1L
X
~
All parking spaces, driveways. loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
{per Section 3-201 (D) (i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor fighting fvdures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing. required. and proposed development, in writtenJtabuJar form:
-L
-L
-L
--L
X
N/A
-L
N/A
KJ
IE)
I
I
I
I.
t
~
'I
"
!
!
,
1
t
-t
-L
--1L
--L
_JL
N/A
REQUIRED
PROPOSED
70~ln4
X
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area-tle\loted {C)-earn use;"-H - .
Parking spaces: total number. presented in tabular form with the
number of required spaces;
Total paved area. induding all paved parking spaces & driveways.
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
EXISTING
70, 104
o
~O
o
o
o
-
0
56 1/2 Red!';
0
112 Beds
77.610 SF
(Includes
8 employees)
See schedule
1 ')'
51'\ 6'
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o
o
73.29%
REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y:; X 11);
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site:
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
AU open space areas:
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned):
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs:
C:\Documents and SettingS\derekJerguson\DesktoplpJanningforms_0707\COmprehensive Inlill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc
Page 5 of 8
.
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
a LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Revised Plan (6/12/0') included.
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales. side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities. and spacing requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, induding botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees. palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures:
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes_
Q{ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to seale (8 Y>X 11);
IX COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated wilh the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements 10 offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met (3)
J. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information;
-.X.- All sides of all buildings;
~ Dimensioned;
-X- Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations);
Materials;
Sight visibility triangles;
ex:
-REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 Y, X 11.
J.
SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain. NI A
10
I
10
I
[0
I
All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) None reques ted
Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). N/ A
Reduced signage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. N / A
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.Jerguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Comprehensive Intil! Project (FlD) 04-24-01.doc
Page 6 of8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-80LC) See Exhibit 'C'
o Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Will generate 100 or more new vehide directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (lTE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a 'Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Departmenrs Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement
IX
ACknO~ement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): .
( Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table' of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
i ~ <aadway legs and mh 'omin, mo_~' al all in"""","'" k1en"'" in the $ropi", Mee'",.
<. Traffic Impact Study is not required. See Exhibit 'C'.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULA TIONSI WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler. standpipe and/or lire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
ro
&;Icknow .dge.menLoffire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the folloWing):
. Fire flow calculations for aNFP A 13 system
Fire Row CalcuJations/Water Study is induded. .th t t d .
w] we s an .p1pes.
__ Fire FlowCalculations/Water Study is not required. See Exhi.bit 'D' attached
CAUTION _ IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONSI WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
1
I
!
,
I
I M.
I
I
I
I
l
SIGNA TURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property descnbed in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNlY OF PINELlAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 4 th day of
March .AD.20 OS to me and/orby
r. R Wprirline ,who is personally known~
~
as identification.
CftL0LJO~
Signature of property owner or representative
erry McDonald
,.,
_: :'It_ j
%:......~~ Expires August 7,2010
,ff,r,\ Bont\edTIl1Y r,m 'In.....oce.lnc 800-365-7019
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc
Page 7 of 8
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. J. A. CHURCHill, llC
J.A.FlOTTERON,PARTNER
2. That (I we/was are) the owner(s) and record this holder(s) of the following described property (address or
general
Location):
1105 East Druid Road
Clearwater, Florida
3. That his property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describer request)
Erect an assisted living facility for the elderly.
4. That the undersigned has/have appointed and (does/do) appoint:
C. R. Wedding, FAIA of Wedding + Stephenson, Architects, Inc., as (her/their) agent(s) to execute any
petition or other documents necessary to affect such petition.
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and
the owner authorizes city representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application.
J oe.epb A. F~B:oe/AT.tJ1D-r
J .A...churcb1-~l.....-LLC
~~.
STATE OF flORIDA,
COUHTY OF PWBJ.,AS
{).1- Z3 . ~ .........._ ~p h ~ . f1 OfuON...__"""",.-
and _1Mf h&1shrI: AJIN ~ ltlot O'\rle/1f!l d'Mlfl'Ml ~ lOinrPrf
.........~~~~t.i"r MARCIA YESCIO _
2~. ./i% Notary Public - State of Florida (} A
[ . : " . ~ My Commission Expires Oct 23. 2011 WvV\ ~
~~" ;'flJf Commission # .00 728182 ~
",f,F/;.~,"" Bonded Through National Notary Assn.
VVA Vi 'v
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BOUNDARY SURVEY OF:
A portion of land in the Southwest % of Sectioni5 Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinel/as County,
Florida, described as follows:
Starting at th9 Northwest corner of the Southeast Yo of the Southwest % of said Section 15; run
S.89003'52nE., along the 40 acre line 295.16 feet; thence S.Ooo04'38"W., 295.16 feet; thence
N-89003'52"W., 295.16 feet; thence N.Goo04'38"E., 295.16 feet to the Point of Beginning; LESS the North
30.00 feet and LESS the West 30.00 feet for road right-of-way.
,REC,
EXHIBIT B
"EN BtJQ"r:
PrNEu..As~ ClERJ( OF COURT
INS. T# 20-~ FLORIDA
......~; 07~
OFF Rec BK: 1632f PO- ,. 11:51 AM
Docl'"ype:ot=ED REcoRD., Z121~122
D COc STAMP: U340.00 NG: $18.&;t
(jO~, ST. DEED
OOC. ST. MTG
WARRANTY DEED
Preparnd by:
N<:vin A- We1l'\er, E3quire INT. TAX MTQ
Nevin A. Weiner, P.A-
100 WallaccAvcnuc:, Suire 100
SSJ"SB.OtR. F'lorida 34237
Tel: (941)373-9966
Fax: (941) 373-9966
Witb.out benefit of ride search
..... - -. .....-....... ...... ....
W DEED
THIS INDENTURE, made this l~yof ;}tY 92008 between DRUID
COURTYARD CLEARWATER, LLe, a Florida limited liability company whose post
office address is 8191 Midnight Pass Road, Saraso~ Florida 34242 GRANTOR, and J .A.
CHURCHILL, LLC, a Florida limited liability company whose address is 12027 Aster
Avenue, Bnu!enton. Florida 34212, GRANTEE.
WIT N E SSE T H, that said Grantor, for and in consideration of the swn of
TEN AND 001100's ($10.00) Dollars arid other good and valuable considerations to said
Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has
gran~ bargained and sold to said GTantee forever, the following described land located
in the County of Pine lIas, State of Florida, to-wit:
starting at the NW corner of the SE Y4 of the SW Y4, 15/29/15, and run 389003'52" the
said 40-acre line 295.16 ft., thence South 0004' 38" West 295.16 feet; thence North
89003'52" West 295.16.teet; thence North 0004'38" East 295.16 foet to the P.O.B., less
easements for right.of-way of Greenwood Avenue and Druid Road. Less and except that
portion conveyed to the City of Clearwater in O.R. Book 5304, Page 659, Public Records
of Pin ell as County, Florida.
Subj ect to valid easements, restricti~ns, and reservations of record, and real propeny
taxes for the year 2008 and subsequent years.
And said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land. and will defend
the .same against the l~wfuI claims of all persons whomsoever. This instrument prepared
without benefit oftitJe search
IN \.'\'lTNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal
this dfY and year ~t ~b!lve ~tten.,
./ r;:. '. i J~ ; ! 1,./
I "'
1
EXHIBIT C
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
AS NOTED IN THE I.T.E. TRIP GENERATION MANUAL, CONGREGATE CARE
FACILITIES HAVE VERY LOW AUTO OWNERSHIP.
THIS HAS PROVEN TO BE THE CASE IN THE OVER 3000 ELDER-CARE UNITS
THAT WE HAVE DESIGNED OVER THE PAST 40 YEARS. ALL TOO OFTEN WE
HA VE- IN ORDER TO MEET THE "NORMAL" RESIDENTIAL PARKING
REQUIREMENT - CONSTRUCTED ACRES OF UNUSED ASPHALT.
THIS HAS BEEN RECOGNIZED IN RECENT TIMES AND RATIOS FOR THIS USE
HAVE BEEN ADmSTED TO AROUND ONE SPACE FOR TWO BEDS.
AT A RECENT PROJECT- OPERATED BY THE SAME MANAGEMENT TEAM AS
DRUID ROAD- I TOOK THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHECK ON THE RESULTS OF
THE FOLLOWING CALCULUS:
FORA 128 BED FULLY OCCUPIED FACILITY IN LARGO:
CODE: 1 SP ACE-PER-2.5 CLIENTS + 1 SPACE PER 250 SF OF OFFICE +
HANDICAPPED = 62 SPACES REQUIRED.
BY ACTUAL DAILY COUNT- TAKEN MORNING AND AFTERNOON- THE
HIGHEST UTILITY OF THE SPACES WAS 37 DURING THE 6 DAY
PERIOD FROM 2/19/09 THRU 2125/09, OR 59%.
THIS PROJECT IS BEING PROPOSED ON A SITE THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED FOR A 47 UNIT MULTISTORY CONDOMINIUM PROJECT.
ACCORDING TO I.T.E. TRIP GENERATION, THIS BUILDING WOULD HAVE
BEEN CLASSIFIED AS "CODE 232" AND GENERATE 4.18 TRIPS PER
DAYIUNIT:
47 UNITS X 4.18 = 196 TRIPSIDA Y (AVERAGE)
THE PRESENT PROPOSAL IS CLASSIFIED AS "CODE 233" AND GENERATES
2.15 TRIPS PER DAYIUNIT:
116 BEDS x 2.15 = 249 TRIPSIDAYIBED
EXHIBIT C
DRUID ROAD ALF
APPLICATION DOCUMENT
WHILE IT APPEARS THAT AN ADDITIONAL 53 TRIPS PER DAY MIGHT BE
GENERATED, THE FORMULA FAILS TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT 20 % OF
THE BUILDING'S BEDS ARE OCCUPIED BY THOSE REQUIRING "MEMORY
CARE"- ABSOLUTELY NONE OF WHOM CAN DRNE OR OWN CARS:
116 X 20% = 93 EQUN ALENT UNITS @ 2.15 = 199 TRIPS PER DAY, OR 3
MORE THAN THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRAFFIC GENERATED.
UNDER THE PRESENT CODE, WE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 78
PARKING SPACES (1 / 1000 SF). HOWEVER IF ALLOWED TO USE THE MORE
COMPARABLE DEFINITION OF "COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL HOMES" WE
WOULD SUPPLY 58 SPACES (ONE FOR TWO BEDS). TO THIS BASE NUMBER
WE WISH TO ADD 8 SPACES FOR EMPLOYEES FOR A TOTAL OF 66. THIS
COULD BE CONSTRUED AS A VARIANCE OF 12 SPACES, BUT IS VERY MUCH
IN LINE WITH THE DATA SUPPLIED HEREWITH.
OUR CURRENT EXPERIENCE IN SIMILAR PROJECTS WOULD INDICATE THAT
THIS WILL STILL BE A FEW SPACES TOO MANY.
IF DESIRED, WE ARE WILLING TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LAWN +
PLANTING AREAS TOGETHER WITH A COVENANT TO PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL PARKING AT THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY IF IT WERE TO
PROVE NECESSARY.
Car Count
2/19/09---------- 11 :OOam --------------------- 27
2/19/09---------- 4:15pm ---------------------- 30
2/20/09---------- 8:00am ----------------------- 35
2/20/09----------12:15pm --------------------- 30
2/20/09---------- 4:15pm ---------------------- 30
2/23/09---------- 8:15am ----------------------- 21
2/23/09---------- 1:00pm ----------------------- 25
2/23/09---------- 4:15pm ----------------------- 27
2/24/09---------- 8: 15am ------------------------ 26
2/24/09---------- 1: 40p m ------------------------ 37
2/24/09---------- 4: 3 Op m ------------------------ 30
2/25/09---------- 8: OOam ----------------------- 23
2/25/09---------- 12 :30pm --------------------- 26
2/25/09---------- 4:30pm----------------------- 28
EXHIBIT D
FIRE FLOW AND WATER SUPPLY
THIS PROJECT RECEIVED A PRIOR PERMIT, AND SOME CONSTRUCTION ON
THE SITE TOOK PLACE.
AMONG THAT WORK WAS A WATER TAP BRINGING 6" MAIN ON SITE AND
THE INSTALLATION OF A FIRE HYDRANT.
THIS SERVICE WILL BE VERY ADEQUATE TO SUPPLY THIS PROJECT, AS
THE DAILY DEMAND IS LOWER AND THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING IS ABOUT
THE SAME SIZE.
I ENCLOSE COPIES OF THE RECEIPTS FOR THE WATER TAP FEE AND THE
FIRE HYDRANT.
KINDL Y SEE THE SURVEY FOR LOCATION OF THE SERVICE AS IT EXISTS
ON SITE.
F\1lE ~ + ~""'eY\ CJ:;L~-n m~ ~~~Wa:>
~,;;pe~11!D2-
--..-.-.-.-.-----.-
# 005520 MISCElLEANEOUS WATER CHARGES
CITY OF CLEARWATER, Ft
AC~.===~~==~/3io~r ====-~D E ~H70& :~RK ~
SEI<VICE ADDRESS II 05 ~ ~ iZl(A ~lVlD JURIS f /}.Q.u- .
The underslaned herebY makes apollcation to the Cltv of ClearNater f~; ~: fOIl~w1n9:
A. Detector check Installation fee:
Genera/ledger Number
421- 1-D343-324
B. Back Flow Preventor size
.(l:;J .
C. Other 0~
421-1-D343-322
~
J~J-LuJ + I fl6ft {( a (-liD /)
Total Paid $ 7 %" ~
Contractor/Property Owner cQ ~ t1.A/'-t:.--tLA.- II~
. '" .-.._--..._.~. . .. .... r.
tllt"....... ^.4.4........ . ff) AJYi./ Cf /7
D!!I!! 'Y ,",uU'=:>'> /"0... . _~ 1'-1- /_ ..,
City Hnil/4.S - Pa..i.E--_o. - . 's~ rL ~p 33 7&'"0
.
=========;;;;:;========= "======~~=--:;=-;= 5# ====
Signature ~" -o~-/ /...~~--p ~...:..
/ / -- / / ' -r.?
The aboveslgned agrees to abide by any and an resolut1ons that are now, or may heraafter be. passed by the Cf1y 01 Ciearwater.
. . . . . . . . ." '. ~ .. . 7. " .'
No \/\1 44B48
. ----
-Y/3 7J 7-5 DalE! J:~~~ 2-
c/-1cS
~
Account No.
Clerk
CU:;TOMER SERVE:: Ii:
WATER
TAP
The undersigned herE by makes appllcat!on fCf top and seNI :e
connection with the Clrl Main at
IIOS r:!' Ut.t{J.d {l~/
- --I. __,
(No.) Street
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
!
,
Deposit No.
Remarks
Depos t $ _____.
If} AI:J
--!-ap QX:~_.,l'224J"i~ ~
Completion Date
Completion dote retlects start of sewer and garbage
charges. NotIfy office at any dote change.
I~L lreuel1.t1 ))1 ~
Contractor or Property 0'7
~
~~41-'
cant l
Meter Sfze
Permit No.
~>
/ .} 0-- .9 ~
Tap FEe $__~~- 0 () .. ..__
~U5[).g 9/7_._
mg i \ddm.ss ,0 .. to' . "'2 .
..- f JJ l /7_:') r tPV-. '- )-;/
~ f::L1..J::1C._ -
0~7-1t:~r~ ~~~ Gn:
Phon,:; No.
The abov8slgned agrees fa abide by any and 011 ra ;olul/on. ordInances. rule. an<
regulations that are now. or moy hereofter be pass,d by the <~Ity of Cleor" ate:
FlorIda. tor the protectIon of wid maIn. S8NlcB pIpe one I mahir anU to resfrlct. Iff, Jlaf,
and control the use of samf and the connections thE rewlfll.
9884-0003-GC
5-0
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
i
i
;
J
i
I
I
!
j
!
~ .
;~
u~
CUSTOMJE:R SERVJ (E
WATER
TAP
Account No.
No. VI if 4B4 9
~L/ 3 7g~ Datf:} __ J /I~a2 ~
/1S
Clerk
The undersigned herE~by makes appllcatbn for top and ser II ::e
connection with the City MaIn at I
II 06 ~ O~ j{.?d_,
(No.)
Street
Deposit No.
) O'[) (
Depost $ _.---:._:25D. __. _ '
Remarks
(jJla~L tJ~ ;Jt~~~L__~~ =
Meter Size
--. ,L.'
311k ~. -':'1 cqj
. rr7.Q L- Tap F€33 $ __ ~~~. (0 () -!..._~
((f~~) . '-
Permit No.
Completion Date _
Completion dote reflects stOlt of sewer and garbage
charges. NotIfy office of any jate change.
rEL I~!~
o at;:t 9/ ~1r
~_.__.. -----
llJ;g J, .ddfE',SS flgJ ,
-,. 1
'" ./ j,li{,o _ ~. z:~ ~.
~ ~-1\/ (iJ /.lj f} ~(; 1:10 {,'02 =-
'~NO. . ,,-?e;
//fl '-. I
l.J'/ ~,..
The aboveslgned ogrees to abIde by any and 011 res )/utI01. orc'lnances. rulES md
regulations that are now, or may hereafter be passl~j by f'he CIty of Clear^" Iter.
Florlda, for the protedlon of sold maIn, servIce pIpe and meteranclto restrlel, rSOl ate
and control the use of same and the connections ther ~wlth
Contractor or Property 0\7
9884-0003-GC
;-01
~ Clearwater
- :::~_.>'::--::""~~:8""~""----;:
u -,.::'':'/-'''~::<,.r><'~~'''''''~-''~~::/
Clearwater Fire & Rescue
610 Franklin Street- Clearwater, Florida 33756
Public Works Administration - Engineering Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 - Clearwater, Florida 33756
R RE FLOW & HYDRA NT WORKSHEET
(Revised 03/29/2006)
This worksheet is required 10 be submitted 10 and approved by the Authoiity Ha~ng Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to eRC
meeting fbr any project that is more than 3 stories or more than 30 feet in height above the lov.est Fire Dept vehicle
access point or for any other project that will require an AuIDmatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Fire Pump befbre
any permits for new building construction, building e.xpansion or fire hydrants will be issued by the City of Clearwater.
Infonnation and design must comply wth Rorida Building Code, Chapter 9 - Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire
Prevention Code to indude applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1,13,130, 13E, 13R, 14, 15,20,291 and 1142 Annex H)
and AWJ\/A M-17 -Installation, Field Testing and Maintenanre of Fire Hydrants.
I PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name: Clearwater Southern Senior Living
Project Address: 1105 E. Druid St
I GENERAL WATER SYST8VlINFORMATION
Location of Nearest Fire Hydrant 901 S. Martin Luther King Jr Ave
Hydrant #: 18
Size of Water Main Supplying Fire Row: 12"
Looped System or Dead End WaterMain? Looped
Static:
63
psi
Residual:
55
psi Pilot:
50
psi
Flow:
1190
gpm
Distance otTest Gauges Relative 10 the Base of the Riser: Horizontal
Ft. Vertical Bevation
Ft.
Hydrant Test Conducted by: City of Clearwater Water Department
(IndlKle/Attach Copy of Actual Test Sheet)
I NFPA HAZARD CLASSI RCA TION
Area #
Classification
1
2
Light Hazard
Ordinary Group 1
Description of Hazard PfOtected
(Col1TT1Clcity Description, Storage Height and Arrangement, if applicable):
Assisted Living Facility
Kitchen, Storage
Attach AddtionaJ Sheets if Necessary
Page 1 of 3
I DESIGN PARAMETERS
Area #
1
2
System Type
Wet
Wet
Area (sq. ft.)
1,500
1,500
Density (gpm'ft)
0.1
0.15
Inside Hose (gpm)
o
o
Outside Hose (gpm)
100
250
Attach Ackltiona/ Sheets jf Necessary
* Total demand determined by requirement of Total Needed Rre Row (N.F.F.)
500 gpm for first standpipe and 250 gpm per
additional standpipe. Is Existing System Supply Suffident 10 Meet N.F.F. Above?
750 gpm
No x
Yes
I COOES A NO ST ANDA RDS
System Corrponent
Uniform Fire Code
Sprinkler System
Standpipe System
Applicable NFPA Standard /Year Edition and Other Applicable Codes or Statutes
NFPA 1/2006
NFPA 13/2007
NFPA 14/2007
Attach Ackltiona/ Sheets jf Necessary
It Project Indudes Fire Pump, Supply the FoIlowng:
Fire Pump Intornation: Pump Capadty: 750
gpm Chum Pressure:
121. 2
psi
psi
Pressure @ 150% Row: 84.4
psi
Rated Pressure: 100
On-Site Storage Tank Capacity (?): N/A
PREPARERI SPECIRER INFORMATION
Preparer Name: Joseph H. Griner III
Company Name: Griner Engineering, Inc.
Mailing Address: 1628 First Avenue North
City:
St. Petersburg
MAY 2 9 2009
State: Florida
Zip: 33713
,JOSEPH H. GRiIIJER. Ii!
. 'FLORIDA PE
#3949'
Phone: 727.822.2335
Fax: 727.821. 3361
.E. Seal
Page 2 of 3
I ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED
Fi re Prewntion Items to be Addressed Prior to ORe Approval:
1. Prov ide Fire Flow Cabulatiors I Waer Study I:1i a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is
available and to determine l a~ upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact d this project. The water supply
must be able to support the needs d a~ required fire sprinkler, standpipe andlorfire pump. If a fire pump is required, the wa1er
supply must be able to supply 150% d is rated capccity. Compliarce with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include
NFPA 13, NFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA291, and NFPA 1142 (Annex H) B required
2. When an FDC B required, I shall be a mininum d 15 feetfran building and shall hale a fire ~drart within 40 feet This ~drant
shall not be located on the same main as the Fire Sprirkler and must be on the supply side d a double detector check v a~.
This hy drart is in addlion to the ~drantthat B required for firefighting purpcses that is to be within 300 feet d building, a:l the
hose lays, and on the same side d the street a:l the proj~t
3. Prov ide and show on the plan a minimum 30.f oet tuming radius for emergerLY vehcle ingress and egress a all entrarces am
exits.
4. Provide and show on the sle plan 24 feet d width at drweways I drtie aisles for anergency vehcle ingress and egress forfrmt
and rear parking lets. Where drtieway s are split I:1i an island with one-way trafic, each side d the Bland shall prO! ide and show
on the site plan 20feet d width at the drtieways on each side d the island
5. Prov ide a Fire Department access roadway (with turn-around, Y, T or cul-de-sac) in cccordarce with NFPA 1. A Fire Department
access roadway must hale 24.foot clear width and 14.foot vertical cleararce, and be capable d supporting the v.eight d Fire
Departmert vehicles (8o,OOOlbs~
Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT E
FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA
I-THIS FNE STORY BUILDING HAS A DECORATIVE PARAPET PROVIDING
VISUAL INTEREST FOR THE VERTICAL ORGANIZATION OF THE
ELEVATIONS. THE PARAPET IS 5'HIGH, AND COMLETELYCONCEALS
THE LOW-SLOPE ROOF BEYOND.
2- TWO INTERIOR SIDES OF THE PROPERTY ARE SCREENED WITH A
WALL THAT IS 6' HIGH. THE TWO STREET FRONTAGES ARE HEAVILY
PLANTED IN BUFFERS AND EXCEED THE NORMAL BUFFER PLANTINGS.
3- THERE WILL BE NO SIGNAGE MORE THAN 4' ABOVE GRADE.
4- ONLY LOW INTENSITY BOLLARD LIGHTING FOR SECURITY AND
ACCESSABILITY WILL BE USED AT THE SITE.
5- WASTE CONTAINERS ARE EITHER LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING
(TENANT WASTE) OR WITHIN A DOUBLE WIDE LANDSCAPED MASONRY
STRUCTURE TO RECEIVE KITCHEN WASTE AND FOR PICK-UP BY THE
SANITATION DEPARTMENT.
6- THE PARCEL IS NOT LOCATED IN A NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION
DISTRICT.
EXHIBIT "F"
SECTION 3-903.D OF THE CDC STIPULATES THAT CORNER LOTS SHOULD
HAVE TWO FRONT SETBACKS AND TWO SIDE SETBACKS.
RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS REQUIRE 25' FRONT YARDS AND 10' SIDE
YARDS, WITH THE PROVISO THAT THEY MAY BE REDUCED TO 10' AND
ZERO RESPECTIVELY.
IN THE PRIOR PROJECT'S APPROVAL BY THE BOARD, MODIFICATIONS TO
THESE SETBACKS WER GIVEN FOR PAVING VARIANCES. SPECIFICALLY
THEY WERE REDUCED TO 18.5 FEET ALONG DRUID ROAD, AND 15' ALONG
MARTIN LUTHER KING.
OUR REQUEST PROVIDES A 20' SETBACK FROM DRUID ROAD, AND A 15'
SETBACK FROM MLK. IN ADDITION WE HA VE PROVIDED A 6' SETBACK IN
THE SIDE YARDS.
WE HAVE MADE SIGNIFICANT ADJUSTMENTS TO THE PARKING AREA TO
ACHIEVE AN EXCEPTIONAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN, AND ADDED THE
REQUIRED GARDEN WALL ALONG THE TWO ADJACENT STREETS.
WE ARE IN COMPLETE COMPLIANCE WITH THE IMPERVIOUS SURF ACE
RATIO FOR THE SITE. WE ARE IN COMPLETE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
DENSITY PERMITTED FOR THE SITE.
THE BUILDING MASS SETBACKS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY GREATER THAN THE
25' MINIMUM FROM THE STREET,- BEING 73' FROM DRUID AND 69' FROM
MARTIN LUTHER KING, AND MEET THE 10' SETBACKS ON THE EAST AND
SOUTH SIDES.
THE DISCUSSION COMES DOWN TO AT-GRADE PAVING SUCH AS
SIDEWALK AREAS SHOWN IN THE SIDE YARDS (WHICH ARE SCREENED
FROM THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES BY THE EXISTING WALL), AND
PARKING AREAS ADJACENT TO THE STREETS.
THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO PROVIDE A VERY PASSIVE USE WITH
MINIMAL TRAFFIC AND ON-SITE ACTIVITY.
WE BELIEVE THAT THE SETBACKS PROPOSED- WHICH DO NOT EXPLOIT
THE MINIMUMS OF 10' AND 0' RESPECTIVELY, ARE A REASONABLE
COMPROMISE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT, AND IMPROVE
UPON THOSE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR THE SITE.
THE INST ALLA nON OF THE SURROUNDING GARDEN WALL, SCREENING
THE PARKING AREAS, CREATES A VISUALLY CONTROLLED FOREGROUND
..
EXHIBIT G
PAGE TWO
FOR THE BUILDING WHICH THEN FORMS A BACKGROUND FOR THE
COMPOSITION.
AS THE SHELTERING ARM OF THE BUILDING EMBRACES THE VIEWER AT
THE N.W. INTERSECTION, THE FOCAL POINT OF THE ENTRANCE LIES 230'
A WAY, PROVIDING A VERY COMFORTABLE DEPTH OF FIELD FOR THE
PEDESTRIAN OR AUTO DRIVER
THE 60' WIDE BUILDING NORTH + SOUTH ELEVATIONS LIE AT THE POINT
OF SETBACK FROM THE TWO STREETS, AND REDUCE THE IMP ACT OF HE
BUILDING MASS AT THESE CRITICAL POINTS.
~
~
~
~
~
l!'l'2'-O'
l!'lO'-Q"
1 WEST ELEVATION
1.1 SCALE: 1'=40'-0'
NOTE:
BUILDING WILL BE
FULLY SPRINKLED
WITH AN NFPA-13 SYSTEM.
EXISTING
FIRE. HYDRA
ACCESS FO
THROUGH S
ADJACENT P
W
WI-
oo::W
ACCESS FOR FIRE TRUCK
THROUGH STREET ON
ADJACENT PROPERTY
I I zoO:: \
' I I
II <(Q..W
; o::o::J:
: i i <(wo \
II i woo
! I ! 6zo ~ ACCESS POINT
::>
I FOR FIRE
~( I ! Co TRUCK
~ DRUID ROAD
I , \\ 7
--- EXIST.
-/ BUS
~ ~ H~ l-
I w
- - - _'I _71 - W
0 \ / / 0::
I-
(j)
I C)
Z
~
I lJ '---./ (j)
I X
I '-- w
I PROPOSED PARKING LOT
I r 1\ ,( 11
I I -
/-----l WET
I - - - - - ~ STANDPIPE
I I I--/--/--r-
ill I ~ J
::)
z I
ill
> I I - I
<(
a:: I
-, I r (\ C( f€'
c.9 EN NCE =
f-
Z I
- - - - - -
~ \ ~ I I ~ !)OR~
a:: - - - PROPOSED I
ill ) FIVE-STORY
I 6 6 6 6
l- I----- --- "--- ALF
::)
--.J ~AC~ ESS POINT COCHERE
Z [ 8R FIRE
I- TRUCK
a:: I I
<( V [ell 'Iii' ENTRANCE
~ l/7 V~~ ) (
Ii I DELlVEF~1 L16' CLEARANCE
I SERVlcI=
UNDER PORTE
I - - COCHERE
I I
DUMPSTER I ~
h ~WET 1/
STANDPIPE
NT~ ~
~\O I FENCED
- - I GARDEN
- - - -
\
EXISTING .--/
ONE-STORY EXISTING STREET
MASONR; ~
BUILDING
R FIRE TRUCK J)
TREET ON PRELIMINARY
ROPERTY _______________ 2 FIRE SITE PLAN
F 1 .1 SCALE: 1'=40'-0"
@
+ c c.;;
Oc
0> (j) -..
C C en
.- Q) ~
"'0 .c Q)
"'0 Q.~
Q) Q).c
> ~ 0
>(j)~
fg
di
ok~
~
E
~ )< ~ g
3~i; ~is
:~.=.,. ~l~
=.B:.v;l (11;;;0
~l~~ l~:
~~~ ~~
~
LL
--.J
<(
o
<(
o
0::
o
::>
0::
o
0<(
<(0
0-
o:~
0-1
- LL
:::) -
0:0:
OW
1-1-
CI)<(
<($
wo:
l{)<(
oW
~-1
~o
~ N
0
~
.
. ~
. c Z
0 0
. ! .
~ '" {
>-
a:: z
<( 0
zz-
-<(I-
~-.J~o
::J(LWb
~W-.J'iT
L.L..I-W;....
(LCJ)O
W Z
~ <(
LL
SHEET NO
F1.1
~""-8'
~~t:::.Q:
~"1'-l!.
q,5~'-C'
B TYPICAL
t .----,-,--
_ ----+-D_ill
. . I
- --+--,-- 0 - ill
+ C I
_ ----L-O_ill_
. t '
- ----+-0-[0-
ill_ O----+--- _
ill -O-----'--+----
C
ill_O-,- _
ill-O~
~.lO'-::l'
~19'-C'
C TYPICAL
~=
~
~!=
~
t11:=2:
A TYPICAL
A.; I
-'-+ ;+-I-;--' ;
B
~'~
~u:..
1 WEST ELEVATION
3.1 SCALE: '"=20''{)'
2 NORTH ELEVATION
3.1 SCALE: ,'=20'.{)'
qr~
~
~"I'-l!'
~53'-O'
<;....- --"1 <' -~ .(-"..., <;/ --.").
~-.
<""- J <'
--.--..-.s:-"J
.,.
...
ill l t:m:i rnrn tIJoj [J]]j I
I t I I I 1 .. .
lill rnrn rnrn illill rnrn rnrn rnrn 'Illm
I-Ic t I I I I I I I C 11}"7';ii1
rnrnrn-rnrn -t-rnrn~ rnrn-t-rnrn- -rnrn rnrn
I I I I I I I. t t '. II I HIIII
:rn rrm-+-rnrn~rnrn_rnrn-t-ITJITJ_rnrn~ITIID,
1
I trrd trro rnrn [J]]jl. m
I I !! f I
rnrn TIm rnrn rnrn DJITJ rnrn rnrn OJ!
,.iClI: III I I.C I I I I I I .c -I
lIlID-rnrn-rnrnTrnrn.~rrm-;-ITIIJ---'-OTIJ.Im
1'1'1. .'11 I '".' I I. I. . I I _ I
/illl_mrn_!ITD--,-ITJITJ ---r--DJITJ_ITIIJ_rnrn OJ
+ - T r
~.8:
~
if~9' -c'
~=
~?l:=.2:
~~l'_C'
~
~I~
-#-.:L B
~,-~
4 EAST ELEVATION
3.1 SCALE: 1"=2O''{)"
3 SOUTH ELEVATION
3.1 SCALE: 1"=20'-0"
~
'Wedding + Stephenson,
Architects, Inc.
(727) 821-6610 (727) 894-4216 Fax
Professional Registration
# AA 0002922 www.weddlngarchltects.com
COLORS (ICI)
A-MP# 10YY 41/175
English Cottage
B-MP# 30YY 60/205
Prairie House
C-MP# 40YY 83/150
Coconut
GLASS - BLUE
JOB NAME:
JOB NUMBER:
DATE:
DRAWING:
SCALE:
DRUID ROAD ALF
W08032
JUNE 11, 2009
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
1 "=50'-0"
@ 2009 WEDDING + STEPHENSON, ARCHITECTS, INC.
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. AVENUE
if
/1
//
//
------~==~=~~~~=~===
\
\
\
\
\
..- r~--~-~--
1:- - ~..:I~-=-=":!c-':
,i' C ~ -1 ~
'-.j' r--::!-
~
i
;~ -lij- i
\!..__J
'\..
~...........-
-(
Ii'
, '-.j'
('......0 I
'< I
~
C'c I . I __h.
c.._ I 0
OOVc i' ~-_-
~,,~~.
It (p-o "I
I
/
r;-.
~ I J
\ \'
\ """, \,
\ '\;,.....
~. U~-
\ ....'i ,~if\
\.
,-,.
'" "
"
~.~
,iU Ii
,f"
'-.j'
~
--
+-
-.
~ -=:J
- k'--
II I
I
-- -i 1---
I I
-- If- --
- ~
o I II @
- 1---
I I
-~ 1-
l t - (! 1-,- --
-- -,
~i ,,-- --
~~
IIIII
,f"
'-.j'
" 11111
tV
III:
..~""'" J/MIIl
-....
"'-- -
l t
/
i
I
Ii'
'-.j'
o
:;0
c
,0
1:;0
10
)>
o
,f"
'-.j'
W, D
/ '~ Wedding + I;
~ Stephenson it
Architects. Inc. ,
~
~
SITE PLAN
DRUID ROAD ALF
1105 EAST DRUID ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
C20lll
WeddIng+SIeprWlIOr\
AId\&ecIl;,lnc
300 FinII A--.. !l
Sult.4al
&.~A33701
121-82'''10
121-mH..421e_
_~Iec;lscnm
--:-=-~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE NUMBER:
~ Clearwater
RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials):
o
DATE RECEIVED:
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 04/24/2007)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT~
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
J.A. Churchill, LLC
-- -'--- "-- ---._..._..~,-~-------_.- - -- ~.._--_._---~----_.- ..-. ---.
8191 Midnight Pass Rd. Sarasota, FL 34242
FAX NUMBER:
EMAIL:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
list All owners on the deed
Joseph Flotteron
__..___u_ ------__ -.-~--_______.____."..._._____~_.._____u~~__"'_.._______--.~-'--_._~_'_____._.___..___________~____n_ _ __ _____.________ _~.___._'__n____.'._
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
Randy Wedding, Wedding + Stephenson Architects, Inc.
- -- --._._---------------_._-~_.._-..._--_.__._-----_.--------------------------...-...---..----- -- ---.. .---------..-- -----.-.-..--- ----...-. --"--- ----...--.- --- .---.-.- ..-- -
300 First Ave. S. Suite 402 St. Petersburg, FL 33701
-- --------.-----.------------- -'.- ...-.-----.- .---------------.--------....".-- ._---... .---_._.--._--~-----------_..--------_.._--~ -.--_.._--~-~_._-
727-821-6610
FAX NUMBER:
727-894-4216
---_..._---_._------~--~~--_.-.-------_.__._._._- ._-----------------"._---~--------~--_._--_._-_.---- ----------.--..--.-
EMAIL: randy@weddingarchitects.com
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
N.A.
.~.~----~----_._--_.._-----._-_..-~----_._._--------_..~-~._--~--_..._~--.-._-~--------~_.._-"._._----------_..._-_._-~-
.-. .v.._ ---..._~..- -~'--'~-_~'_.~'_'_" + _n__'..__ ...- _.._--- '-'"'--. ."" _.- --...___ _. __'~_'_'_"_~. __~__,_ _ __ _____~,..._...."_ ~_"""____"._ __'_ ...._____._.. _.".______....__._ ____. .'__ .~____ ". _. ... h ___~_ ..,~", ____,,____. ..__ ___....,,__. __~_. __.___.' __.__.,_....._.____.. ....,. ~.__ _' _......__.______ ~ ...._.
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise pennitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
The East and South landscape buffers do not have trees planted 35' on center. This is due to the
existing trees limiting the use of canopy trees in the southeast corner of the property and the
cl.ClE:1f:!J>l:."<Jx:~lllitr<J.f the bui1d~~~..facade to th~pJ:<Jpert:;:r linelilll~1:.iIl~1:.?:~.1:.J:ee choices topallI1s.
IIl.<:::QtrlP~nSCl..tj,QI1 +O~.t:!1e..g~yi.Cl,t.:i,O!lt::rom tl1eC'Qq~reqLli:reItlEmt. tl1~ .tQ.119WiIlg.itellll? .a:r~pr.QY:ided:.
(30) Trees are larger than required - 4" caliper vs. 2.5" caliper (11) Palms are added that are
not :r~quired by the Code.
C:lDOCuments and Settings\derek. fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_ 0707\Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
-.. - .. -,.,.,
,)
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
The proposed increase in the number of palms and the size of trees will provide more shade for
,__~"_'___~_"~_"'__'_"'__ ~ u____.__,______'.____'._. __.__.._,_._____._....__._,___ . _._ ...__..___..___.__.", .__ '.. ___,. _ .__", _..._,.,_ .___"__~__'_""'____M. __..__,.'__... _.__.___..'__."_..._._ '__~~"______ ,_
t!:e_J;>~J:'J:c~Il9'_~r:>t and buildiI1~_' The pa~~n13 and trees will also I>:r(),,~~e additiona:J.___:v:~~:ual_b:uffering
of1:h~IJ}l:i;lc1iIlg fr()l!I th.e_~c1jCi9~Ilt rO(;ic1!'li'lYS,
3. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
N.A.
4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
N.A.
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS I ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in
this application are ..true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
sw~subscribedbefOremethiS ;s::Vt. day. of...
,- , A.D. 20 07 tQ me and/or by
I: t ~'"';:) , who~personally known has
produced ~-~
as identification.
~. ~//< ~
-;: /} . _ II -J./
--N iry~~~- ~~.li~~;--KA1lllE9i~
My commission expires: . . MY COMMISSION I DO 871671
* * .
--~~repiesentative----------------
C:\Documents and Settings\derek. fergusonlDesktop'yJ/an!!~n~rm~;:: 0707\Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
,
o
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE NUMBER:
: Clearwater
RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 04/24/2007)
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
J.A. Churchill, LLC
--,.~--~-~-._....~-~---_._.__._~ ---- ---- ----~ ~
8191 Midnight Pass Rd. Sarasota, FL 34242
FAX NUMBER:
EMAIL:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
Joseph Flotteron
list ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
Randy Wedding, Wedding + Stephenson Architects, Inc.
300 First Ave. S. Suite 402 St. Petersburg, FL 33701
727-821-6610
FAX NUMBER:
727-894-4216
EMAIL: randy@Weddingarchitects.com
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
N.A.
- ,.-----..__.._----~..._...--~-_.-.~-.__._~------_._~- "', .~-------------_.__.- _.'-- - . -' - .--'~>"--- -.-._--~-- --~---'-' --.-.-,----.-----. .._~----~- -'.~~ ~..~_.._.~---_.__.---_._._.~ -'-'--.' .--
'-'- '-_"'~_'___'_'~_""_____._'~___"___~___~"_'~'_T'__"'" ..---._.___~_. .-. ..'______ .. _. __,__..,,_..,~ _ _.....___.._.._.__._.___.____._....~.._._.__.._____~_~___.___T._",_____-._ ____,' ,..... ._..".
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
There are several trees that are proposed to be located closer than 5' from impervious surfaces.
This condition is limited to trees that do not develop into large canopy trees thus limiting the
~ltlP~<::,~.._~t:_x.:.~()_~_?~f!I<:l~e_.t:(),_t:!1~_~(l\p~rvi ()~~.. s_~~~ ac:::~~ .: __ ,. '",.... _. __ .'___ __._______._____ __.__ ______________ ._.__
IIl9()mPE!n~?_1;:i()_I.1_f().;_.1;l1e.cl.€!yiati9nfrQm the CcKI€! .:rE!quirement thefQ).lowiIl9ui,tEllll.!? aXE!p:r9yide(j:
(30) Trees are larger than required - 4" caliper vs. 2.5" caliper (11) Palms are added that are
not required by the Code.
C:lDocuments BOO SettingS\derek.tergusonlDeS!dOplplan:;inrJfo.rm;;:0707\Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
!
.
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
T~= ~r:~P<:~=~_~~~r:=~~="~~_~~=H.I1~mber of palm~_~~~_.~=.~~z~<:>.~.t_r==.~ will .~r~"i~~..m()==..~~.Cl~= f~r
the parking lot andl:>tli~.?~IlSJ'.'I'he palms and trees will also provide additional visual buffering
of. thE!. .b1.:l:iJ'c:!~Ilg 1:r::2!l1..t:h-_~..i3.C:!j<3.9E!nt. I:ga,d'!"<iYs..
3. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development
N.A.
4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
N.A.
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A lEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS ( ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in
this application-are. true and .. accurate. to . the best of. my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
----~~~
Signature of property owner or presentative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS.
Swo~ to and subscribed before me this '.'/5:0-, day of
L~ ., A.D. 2~e and/orby
(Ie It cJed.,b"6 ' who s personally' nown has
produced. .
as identification.
- ~
. <v~. . .-/ ..
~1i!C.--- .-D- ~,,,,, .:=.~
My commission expires: ....~ * EXPIRES' AprM 6 2013
'\~.. - ".
C:\Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonIDesktoplp/anningforms_0707\Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
-- _ . ..... -,,'"
J
'"
o
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE NUMBER:
~ Clearwater
RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 04/24/2007)
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
J.A. Churchill, LLC
______________ _.____.. __..._...._.,__ n. ,.___.. 0'" ._ ___________.._____ _ __._______._.__~___ ____
8191 Midnight Pass Rd. Sarasota, FL 34242
FAX NUMBER:
EMAIL:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
List ALL owners on the deed
Joseph Flotteron
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
Randy Wedding, Wedding + Stephenson Architects, Inc.
- --~--------_.._--------.- --.- ._~._,...--- .------ .-.---.----...------- . ---'-'--'_..._--._--~-"------'-----
300 First Ave. S. Suite 402 St. Petersburg, FL 33701
727-821-6610
FAX NUMBER:
EMAIL:
727-894-4216
randy@weddingarchitects.com
1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
N.A.
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise pennitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
A concrete sidewalk is encroaching into the landscape buffer on the south side of the building.
The sidewalk is the only egress available from the building'S mechanical rooms to the parking lot.
In comJ2e:l1:~~~1:~<:>Il. for t;l:L~.ci~:\T~~t;~On from the Code re5P.ir.e~e=l1:1:.uthe followin~i 1:e=~!3a.~~ pr-<:>vided:
(3()JT:r:eE!Elarela:t"g~:t"t:h~:I1 n~quired - 4" cal"iper vs. 2,,5" caliper (:1,1) Pa.lmsa~eCl<idE!g that are
not required by the Code.
C:\Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplp/anningforms_0707\Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc
_.. - ~ -,^
J
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
The proposed increase in the number of palms and the size of trees will provide more shade for
thepar.kinglot and building. The palms and trees will also prc>vide additional visual buffering
. of t:l1l?l::>uilciiIlg. frQmthe Cidja<::E:l1trQaciw.CiYs..
3. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
N.A.
4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
N.A.
THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in
this application are true and accurate. to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Swo 0 and subscribed before me this IS Z't day of
, A.D. 20 0 e and/or by
, who' person~~~own has
._~fQ2!~,.,.otatwe._-_..-
A. t'U u.~
produced
as identification.
..N~~=~~
My commission expires: * ",biL * ION' 00 871671
...~~ EXP/AES: AprH6, 2013
C:\Documents and SettingSlderek.ferguson\Desktop\p18n:!in~rm;;: OlO7\Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-01.doc
..
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORATED
Geotechnical Engineering & Construction Material:=, Te_sting
-
weDDING & STEPHENSON
ARCHITECTS. INO
RECEIVED:
RECEIVED
.' C:f ._" n
"
J .A. Churchill, LLC
c/o Wedding + Stephenson Architect
300 First Avenue South, Suite 402
S1. Petersburg, Florida 33701
May 5, 2009
Attention:
Mr. C. Randolph Wedding, F AlA
President
RE: Supplemental Comments
Normal Seasonal High Groundwater Table
Proposed Drainage Area
Proposed Druid Road ALF
Clearwater, Florida
Our File: DES 096338
Dear Mr. Wedding:
The purpose of this letter is to expand on a discussion of the normal seasonal high
groundwater table. Our comments are in reference to Question #4 of the April 17, 2009 response
to the Environmental Resource Permit Application. In Question #4, the statement was made that the
soil survey indicates a Pomello fine sand soil series with a seasonal high water table approximately
10 to 40 inches below existing grade. It is true that this is a Pomello fine sand but it should be more
appropriately defined as an Urban Pomello as identified in the 1972 Soil Survey of Pin ell as County.
Accordingly, there is no indication of a normal seasonal high groundwater table.
Based on the information we reviewed, you have apparently utilized a normal seasonal high
groundwater table at EI. +38.0 feet in your drainage design. In our opinion, this would represent a
very conservative estimate of the normal seasonal high groundwater level which we believe would
probably occur at least 3 to 4 feet lower in elevation.
Sarasota
Phone: 941.371.3949
Fax: 941.371.8962
saroffice@driggers-eng.com
Clearwater
12220 49th Street North · Clearwater, Florida 33762
Phone: 727.571.1313 · Fax: 727.572.4090
clwoffice@driggers-eng.com
Tampa
Phone: 813.948.6027
Fax: 813.948.7645
tpaoffice@driggers-eng.com
2
As an added note, we recently returned to the site and conducted a classification boring
within the confines of the excavated area which is some 6 feet below surrounding ambient grade.
We estimate that the bottom ofthe excavated area probably occurs at about El. +38.7 feet. A hand
auger classification boring identified a groundwater table at a depth of 13.8 feet below the excavated
grade which corresponds to approximate El. + 24.9:l: feet. In order for the groundwater table to rise
to El. +38 feet, this would necessitate a groundwater level increase of about 13.1 feet. In our
professional opinion, such a drastic increase in groundwater levels is not realistic and we remain of
the opinion, that normal seasonal high groundwater elevation should occur well below El. 38 feet.
Nevertheless, as we indicated in our report of March 4,2009, confirmation of potential seasonal high
groundwater level fluctuations in an urban environment would necessitate installing shallow
piezometers and observing groundwater levels during the upcoming wet season. If you wish to
pursue this observation program, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your
convemence.
Respectfully submitted,
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
~:.:1.....,__.._..,
t
FL egistration No. 16989
FJD/cmc
FJD-LET\096338a
Copies submitted: (2)
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AVENUE
,------ --- ------------------,
o
::::0
I
N
OJ
o
~::::o
I
-"
o
~~
N
o
;0
c
o
-0
::::0
o
-0
o
8 ,
)> I
U) I
~ I
~ I
~ \
s::: I
rrJ I
I ~ I
I I
I I
L - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-.J
-0
::::0
o
-0
o
U)
rrJ
o
OJ
c
r
o
z
G)
;0
o
)>
o
~
:CO
)>0
zc
OOJ
r
)>rrJ
cl
G)::O
rrJ-
::::oZ
G)
OJ-
OZ
::::0"
-r
Z-/
G")::::o
r)>
0-/
00
)>Z
-/-1
OrrJ
ZU)
-I
"""
U)
o
)>
~l]A
"V
..j:>.
o~
CAD FILE NAME: N: \ACLTWIN\PLATE1\096338DRI2B,DWG DRAWN BY: RDB DATE 4/30/09
CAD ENGINEER
..
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING
SERVICES INCORPORATED
-
SH EET TI TLE
DOUBLE-RING INFILTRATION TEST
LOCATION PLAN
PROJECT NAME
PROPOSED DRUID ROAD ALF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PROJECT NO.
R.D.B. / F.J.D.
DES 096338
PREPARED BY
SHEET NO.
P LA TE
~
:1:0
)>0
zc
om
r
)>fTl
cl
G);o
rrl-
;oZ
G)
m-
OZ
;0"
-r
2-t
G);o
r)>
o-t
DO
)>2
-t-t
OfTl
2c.n
-t
..........
I ~
I fTl
I ~ I
I I
I I
L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - _ - _.-J
c.n
()
)>
~z:z^
IIV
-!::>-
o
CAD FILE NAME: N: \ACLTWIN\PLATE1\096338DRI28.DWG DRAWN BY R.D.B. DATE: 4/30/09
R.D.B. / F.J.D.
SHEET TITLE
DOUBLE-RING INFILTRATION TEST
LOCATION PLAN
PROJECT NAME
PROPOSED DRUID ROAD ALF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PROJECT NO.
CAD / ENGINEER
DES 096338
PREPARED BY
SHEET NO.
-
PLATE
..
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING
SERVICES INCORPORATED
.---- ---------- -- -- ----I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~NIOlln8 03S0dOtld
~
~-ltlO
~
l-ltlO
I IlVHdSV 03S0dOtld
---------- -- -------- --~
fO~ oln~o
$:
)>
;0
-I
Z
r
C
-I
I
fTl
;0
^
Z
G)
~
L
;0
)>
<
fTl
Z
C
fTl
-=I E!!::i i
DRIGGERS
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
INCORPORA TED
HAND AUGER BORING LOG
PROJECT: CLIENT:
Proposed Druid Road ALF JA Churchill LLC
Clearwater, Florida WATER TABLE: I DATE:
Proiect No.: DES 096338 13.8' 4/24/09
TECHNICIAN: DATE: I COMPLETION DEPTH:
M.B. 4/24/09 15.0'
LOCATION: TEST NUMBER:
See Plate I DRI-2B
...J
ELEV. DEPTH 0
DESCRIPTION to REMARKS
(FT) (FT) ::i:
>-
en
0 . . . . Surface Elevation:
Very light gray Fine SAND (SP) . . . . +38.7+/-'
. .
.. . . (Approximately 6.0' Below
. .
. . . .
. . . . Surface Elevation at DRI-2 Location)
. .
.. . .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
36 .. . .
..
3 . . . .
. . . .
. .
Brown Fine SAND (SP) . . . .
. . . .
. .
.. . .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
.. . .
. .
33 . . . .
. . . .
6 .. . .
. .
. . . -
. . . .
.. . .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
. .
.. . .
. .
. . . .
30 . . . .
9 .. . .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
.. . .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
Dark brown Fine SAND with trace :-!
.. . .
27 of finely divided organic material (SP) . .
. . . .
12 . . _.
.. . .
.r-: . .
. . . .
.. ;..,
. .
. . - .
. .
:~
.. . .
24 . . _.
. .
15 . . . .
21
18
18
21
'J)
r ~~"~=Q ..
~ \--rEo: 'T ~v~
"'11
May 21, 2009
Professional Engineering Resources, Inc.
Engineering, Planning, Permitting
Ms. Phuong Vo
City of Clearwater Engineering Department
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, PI. 33758-4748
RE: Druid Road ALF
PinelIas County - S 15 IT 29S I 15E
PEER Job No.: 09- I 728
FLD 2009-03014
Dear Ms. Vo:
As per your review comments dated April 21, 2009, please find enclosed the additional information you
requested for the above referenced project.
(1) Comment: Please demonstrate that the proposed vault recovers its entire 50 year event
volume 24 hours based on the result of the double ring soil test.
Response: As per your request, an addition double ring test was prefonned at the bottom
of the proposed pond vault. Please find enclosed a copy of the Driggers Engineering
Services Inc. dated May 14, Report. As indicated on the last page of the Report, the
double ring test was taken at elevation 38.7+1- Ft. NA VD. The bottom elevation of the
vault is 38.00 Ft. NA VD. According to page 2 of the Report, the infiltration rate is 30
inches per hour ( 60 Ft/Day). Plus, the ground water elevation was detennined to be 13.8
feet below existing grade which equates to an elevation of 30.9 Ft NA VD. Please see page
I of the Report. Based on Professional Engineering Resources, Inc. Drainage Calculations
dated March 2009, the 50 year stage is 42.692 Ft. NA VD which correlates to a volume of
0.765 Ac-Ft.= 33,323.40 cf Please see attached Figure 13. Please find enclosed
infiltrations calculations utilizing the Modret program. As shown on the attached
calculations, the seasonal water elevation was taken as elevation 37.00 Ft NA VD which is
I foot below the bottom of the vault. The amount of time to percolate the 50 year volume
of33,323.40 cfis 3.0 hrs.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to calI.
erma, P.E.
cc: Mr. Randy Wedding wlo enclosure
PVS/csc
[P: \ WPDOCS\2009 JOBS\l728\PHUONGL TRS-21-09. wpd]
646 94th Avenue North · St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2463
(727) 576-2007 · Fax (727) 576-3537 · E-Mail: peer@tampabay.rr.com
"..
RS ENGINEERING SERVICES INCD
Geotechnical Engineering & Construction Materials Testing
"..
I.A. Churchill, LLC
c/o Wedding + Stephenson Architects
300 First Avenue South, Suite 402
81. Petersburg, Florida 33701
March 31, 2009
Attention:
Mr. C. Randolph Wedding, AlA
President
RE: Summary of Findings
Proposed Druid Road ALF
Clearwater, Florida
Our File: DES 096338
...\
Dear Mr. Wedding:
Pursuant to your request and authorization, DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES,
INC. has completed the requested soil borings within the area ofthe proposed assisted living facility.
INVESTIGATION PROGRAM
Plate I of the report attachments identifies the respective positioning of five (5) Standard
Penetration Test (SPT) borings that were conducted within the proposed structure area. You will
note the borings were located in the field with reference to on site features identified on the survey
provided for our use. The borings were advanced to depths of 50 to 75 feet below present grade.
Logs of the Standard Penetration Test borings are presented in the attachments, together with a brief
description of this sampling and testing technique.
Two (2) Double-Ring Infiltration (DR!) tests were also conducted within potential
stormwater management areas. The results of this testing were presented in a previous report dated
March 4,2009.
Sarasota
Phone: 941.371.3949
Fax: 941.371"8962
saroffice@driggers~ng.com
Clearwater
12220 49th Street North. Clearwater, Florida 33762
Phone: 727.571.1313 . Fax: 727.572.4090
c1woffice@driggers~ng.com
Tampa
Phone: 813"948.6027
Fax: 813.948.7645
tpaoffice@driggers~ng.com
, .
-.
2
A limited laboratory classification testing program was also implemented at this time to aid
in characterizing the engineering properties of the subsurface soils. The results of the laboratory
tests are included in the report appendix.
SUMMARY OF INITIAL FINDINGS
STRUCTURE TYPE AND LOADING CONDITIONS - Based on the preliminary information
provided, the proposed structure will likely consist of concrete construction and be five (5) stories
in height. Although structural loading conditions were not available as of the time of this writing,
experience on similar projects suggests column loads may be on the order of 400 to 500 kips and
wall loads may be 12 to 15 kips per lineal foot. Also, we would expect minimal fill (2 feet or less)
may be required to establish the finished floor elevation for the new structure.
It is important to recognize that the following preliminary discussion is based on assumed
loads. Once actual structural loads are advanced, the preliminary recommendations herein may
require modification.
FOUNDATION CONDITIONS - Our geotechnical studies have identified very loose sands and
silty sands within the upper 20 to 25 feet as well as deeper potentially compressible clayey sands and
clays to depths of about 35 feet that could produce significant settlement associated with the assumed
structural loads. Based on our preliminary analyses, conventional shallow foundations would be
predicted to experience settlements on the order of 2 inches based on the results of the Standard
Penetration Test (SPT) borings and a soil bearing pressure of3,OOO psf. It is important to recognize,
however, that these preliminary predictions of settlement are based on typical correlations to
Standard Penetration Test (8PT) boring data which are generally considered conservative. SPT
borings are the most widely utilized tool for securing the initial data on a site due to the abundance
of data secured utilizing this methodology including penetration resistance information and soil
samples for iaboratory testing. However, where it is judged that more detailed testing and analyses
could result in potential reductions in settlement to within tolerable levels, more sophisticated testing
is warranted. In this regard, we recommend performing a series ofthree (3) DilatometerTest (DMT)
soundings in order to further investigate the compressibility characteristics ofthe very loose and soft
materials. Based on our experience with similar soils on other sites, DMT testing has often resulted
in significant reductions in the predicted settlement and on this site may allow the utilization of a
shallow foundation system with appropriate subgrade preparation.
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
'.
-.
3
In the absence of further testing, a deep foundation system or deep ground improvement to
reduce the settlement potential of shallow foundations may be required. We would expect that
augered cast-in place (ACIP) piles or prestressed concrete piles would present the most cost effecti ve
pile foundation alternatives. Of course, driven pre-stressed concrete piles produce significant noise
and vibrations that could cause settlement to adjacent structures and/or disturb neighboring
occupants. We would anticipate that the deep ground improvement would include vibro-replacement
stone columns to a depth of about 25 to 30 feet below grade in order to reduce the settlement
potential of the soils within the depth of significant stress influence.
SLAB-ON-GRADE - Based on the results of the borings, new slabs may be supported on a
compacted sub grade. Fill that may be required should consist of fine sands comprising the SP to SP-
SM Unified Soil Classification System. Utility trenches and ruts should be re-Ieveled and uniformly
compacted to avoid sharp discontinuities in bearing characteristics and slab thickness that could
induce cracking.
NEED FOR FURTHER TESTING - As mentioned previously, the information herein is
considered preliminary pending the results of the recommended secondary testing. The secondary
testing will consist ofthree (3) Dilatometer Test (DMT) soundings as well as additional geotechnical
analyses. The costs associated with these additional recommended services are included in the
attached unit fee schedule.
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
- .
4
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. appreciates the opportunity to be of
service to you on this project. Should you have any questions concerning our initial findings, please
do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
} f !lfj
,P.E.
. e Driggers, P .E.
ident
FL Registration No. 16989
WSD-REP\096338
Copies submitted: (3)
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
UNIT FEES AND ESTIMATED COSTS
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1. Dilatometer Test (DMT)
Soundings
2. Supplemental Data Interpretation
& Engineering Analyses
Authorized by:
UNIT FEE
$2,500.00/Da
y
140.00/Hr.
ESTIMATED
AMOUNT
1 Day
6 Hrs.
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST:
C. Randolph Wedding, AlA
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
5
ESTIMATED
COST
$ 2,500.00
840.00
$ 3.340.00
APPENDIX
PLATE I - BORING LOCATION PLAN
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING LOGS
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
GRAINSIZE ANALYSES
METHOD OF TESTING
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
PLATE I - BORING LOCATION PLAN
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AVENUE
,------ ----------------------\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
~ '" r
JIl
C)
:r:o (f) JIl
>0 -i Z
zc > 0
OlD Z . .
r 0
>1"'1 >
cl ;0
G");O 0
1"'1-
;oZ IJ
G") 1"'1
lD- Z
OZ 1"'1
;0" ;ti
-r
z-i >
G");o -i
r> 0
o::::i Z
00 -i
>Z 1"'1
-i-i (f)
01"'1 -i
Z(f) lD
-i
............ 0
;0
Z
G")
r
0
0
>
-i
0
Z
(f)
o
>
~[ZA
IIV
-f:>.
q
CAD
ENGINEER
R.D.B. / F.J.D.
PREPARED BY
0~
(J1
o
~;o
I
--"
o
~~
N
0~
~
lDlJ
C;O
_0
rlJ
00
z(f)
GJITl
o
lD
01
VJ
~~
N
0~
--"
IJ
;0
o
'1J
o
(f)
1"'1
o
>
(f)
'1J
:r:
>
r
-i
'1J
>
<
1"'1
~
1"'1
Z
-i
o
:::0
C
o
:::0
o
)>
o
SHEET TITLE
CAD FILE NAME: N \ACL TWIN\PLA TEl \096338.DWG DRAWN BY: R.D.B DA TE: 3/3/09
BORING LOCATION PLAN
PROJECT NAME
PROPOSED DRUID ROAD ALF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PROJECT NO.
DES 096338
SHEET NO.
PLA TE
~ ~ r
(T1
(;")
:co (f) (T1
)>0 --I Z
zc )> 0
oaJ z . .
r 0
)>1T1 )>
cl ;0
G);;O 0
1'1-
;;02 -0
G) IT1
aJ- 2
OZ IT1
;;0" --I
-r ;;0
Z--I )>
G);;o -I
r)> 0
0--1 2
00 -l
)>Z fT1
6~ (f)
-l
2(f) aJ
--I
'-. 0
;;0
z
G)
r
0
()
)>
--I
0
Z
~ "- ,-J \ I I
L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - _..c...- - - ~
(f)
o
)>
~llA
uV
~
q
CAD FILE NAME: N:\ACLTWIN\PLATE1\096338.DWG DRAWN BY: R.D.B. DATE: 3/3/09
SHEET TITLE
PROJECT NO.
CAD / ENGINEER
DES 096338
BORING LOCATION PLAN
R.D.B. / F.J.D.
SHEET NO.
PROJECT NAME
PROPOSED DRUID ROAD ALF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PLATE
PREPARED BY
-
DRUID ROAD
,---------------------- ---
PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEME
DRI-2
~
E
w
=>
Z
W
>
<(
DRI-1
~
.
0:::
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~------------------------------------
8-
~
C)
Z
~
0:::
W
I
l-
=>
-1
8-5
S
8-4 PROPOSED
S BUILDING
B-3
S
Z
I-
0:::
<(
:2
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING LOGS
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
'E:I~mtli" , "p
DRIGGERS
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
INCORPDRA TED
Project No. DES 096338 BORING NO. B-1
Project Proposed Druid Road ALF, Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman J.R.
Completion Deroh To
Depth 51.5' Date 2/25/09 ater ** Time Date 2/25/09
D::~ STANDARD
~ tJ) zWI-
u.. ..J W Oa..~ PENETRATION TEST
0 ..J SOIL DESCRIPTION (l)D::z
:J: m D.. ~ww BLOWS/FT. ON 2" 0.0.
~ :E
D.. :E O~a.. SAMPLER-140 LB.
>- <
w tJ) ...J::ED::
C tJ) ID<O HAMMER, 30" DROP
SURF. EL: +42.6+/-' (I):
CD 10 20 40 6080
0 ~; T~}~ ; Light brownish-gray Fine SAND with roots (SP)
,
. ..... "Gravish-brown and liaht aray Fine SAND (SP)
". -"
.... ..
....0.
. 0- 0_' Medium dense to loose very light gray Fine SAND
.....-.. .
.... .. 6/7/8
. .....
.... .. (SP)
...." - /
. .....
........
':,
5 .. 4/3/4 ~
....
...... 7
.... ..
. "0"'
..-." .
...... .::, Very loose dark brown Fine SAND 1/2/2 ..
.0-- .. with seams of very light gray Fine SAND (SP)
......
.... ..
. 0_'_'
. .....
.... ..
.... .. Loose tannish-brown to brown Fine SAND (SP)
.... .. 1/2/3
- .....
. .....
....-...
.... ..
......
10 ..". ..
. .....
. .....
........
.... .. 2/2/4 It
..,. ..
.... o'
. ..... ,-
. .....
........
.... ..
.... ..
.... .. '-
. ..0".
. ..... 2/3/6
........
.... ..
".- ..
.... ..
. .....
. .....
........
\0.'" ..'_. Medium dense dark brown slightly organic \
15 'J'" "'...
,6,_." ....
!:.~ ~...:: Fine SAND (SP) .~
-- -.- 3/5/7
--...
........ .., 7
;.:-I!-:..:
."'~ ,....
...."'...1'".
.....- -'-
. . /
- -.. . . Very loose grayish-brown silty,
. -
. -
- - - --
. . - . slightly clayey Fine SAND (SM) /
20 . .
. - - --
.. .. . 3/2/2
. .
. .
. .
..... .
Very loose light brownish-gray silty Fine SAND
(SM) 1
25 I~
0/1/0
\
\
~ Stiff grayish-green weakly cemented CLAY (CH) \
30 ~ \
0 5/6/7
'\
) '\
~ Very stiff to hard grayish-green cemented (1) '\
Remarks Borehole Grouted (1 ) CLAY (CL)
** Water Table not encountered within depth of 10.0' Casing Length 20.0'
11::113~ i
'DRIGGERS
ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORATED
Project No. DES 096338 BORING NO. B-1
Project Proposed Druid Road ALF, Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman J.R.
Completion Deroh To
Depth 51.5' Date 2/25/09 ater ** Time Date 2/25/09
o::ti STANDARD
t- U) zWI-
LL ...I W On.~ PENETRATION TEST
0 ...I SOIL DESCRIPTION Cl)O::z
:::I: lD Il. ~ww BLOWS/FT. ON 2" 0.0.
t- ~
D.. ~ O~1l. SAMPLER-140 LB.
>- <
w U) ...I::!O:: HAMMER, 30" DROP
c U) lDc(O
SURF. EL: +42.6+/-' U):
CD 10 20 40 6080
35 ~ Very stiff to hard grayish-green cemented CLAY
rz (CL) 6/14/25 \
~ I
~ I
I
40 ~
11/14/16
\
~ \
\
45 ~
12/18/28 .-. .
~
oL'
~ .. Hard dark grayish-green cemented CLAY
with seams of gray Fine SAND (CLlSP) I
50 ~ ~
13/14/21
55
60
65
Remarks Borehole Grouted
** Water Table not encountered within depth of 10.0' Casing Length 20.0'
11::1 EI!~,i
DRIGGERS
ENGINEERING SERVICES
INCORPORA TED
Project No. DES 096338 BORING NO. B-2
Project Proposed Druid Road ALF, Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman J.R.
Completion De~h To
Depth 51.5' Date 2/25/09 ater ** Time Date 2/25/09
a:: Ii STANDARD
.... 0 ZW....
LL ..J W Oo.(/) PENETRATION TEST
0 ..J SOIL DESCRIPTION (/)a::z
:J: m 0. s::ww BLOWS/FT. ON 2" 0.0.
.... :E :E O~D. SAMPLER-140 LB.
a.. >- <
w (/) ..J:EO:::: HAMMER, 30" DROP
c 0 01<0
SURF. EL: +42.8+/-' 0=
co 10 20 40 6080
0 .i :f.:"~,:, ~ \~i9ht brownish-gray Fine SAND with some roots
. .....
. ..... SP)
........
.... ..
".-"
.... .. Very light gray and light brownish-gray
. --.".
. .-0". .
........ Fine SAND (SP) 3/2/3
.... ..
. "_0"' 1
..". ..
. ..... Loose very light gray Fine SAND (SP)
. .....
5 /{T"{f 2/3/3 ~
..._ o' j
......
.,". ..
. .....
......
.... .. Very loose brown Fine SAND "
. ..... 2/1/2
. .-0".
........
.... .. with seams of light gray Fine SAND (SP)
......
.0". ..
. .....
. .-.-.
".." Loose brown Fine SAND (SP) ~
.... 2/2/3
. .-0".
..-.....
.... .. \
......
.0"' ..
. -..".
10 - .....
-.- .-- Loose dark brown slightly organic Fine SAND ~
'-... .."." 2/3/4
-. -.,; '""."
....... "."~.
;:::; ;'.~ (SP)
...- ...--
.... ..
..... . Loose dark brown Fine SAND (SP)
..-. -, 2/3/5 ..
. .....
. .....
.-......
.... .. f
......
.... -.
. .....
. ..... /
......-.
.... ..
15 ......
.... .,
. ..... ~
. .....
......-. 1/2/3
-... -.
......
.... .. J
. .....
. .'.-.
---.....
.... ..
".p"
.... ..
. .....
- .....
.. ....
Wllll Very loose light grayish-brown silty Fine SAND I
1111111 (SM) 7
20
0/0/1
11:1:1:1:1:I:r
11:1:1:1:1:1:1
1111111/ \
t/D- Soft gray sandy CLAY (CH) \
25 ~ ~
~ 1/1/3
\
7) \
.- .
~ Very stiff to hard grayish-green cemented CLAY \
~ (CL) \
30 \
4/5/13
% \
1\
0 \
Remarks Borehole Grouted
** Water Table not encountered within depth of 10.0' Casing Length 20.0'
1::1 EE!~i
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES
INCORPORA TED
Project No. DES 096338 BORING NO. B-2
Project Proposed Druid Road ALF, Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman J.R.
Completion Deroh To
Depth 51.5' Date 2/25/09 ater ** Time Date 2/25109
et:O::: STANDARD
t- en zw....
LL ...I W OQ.(/) PENETRATION TEST
0 ...I SOIL DESCRIPTION (/)et:z
:t: m Q. ~ww BLOWS/FT. ON 2"" O.D.
t- ::E
a.. ::E oiiD.. SAMPLER-140 LB.
> <(
w (/) ..J::Eet: HAMMER, 30" DROP
c (/) mc:(O
SURF. EL: +42.8+/." en:
CD 10 20 40 6080
35 % \
0- - trace of gray Fine SAND below depth 35.0' 9/14/14 ~
~
j0 Very stiff to hard grayish-green cemented CLAY
~ (CL) \
\
~ \
40 Z
~' 15/15/24 ~
~ \
.. . %"- Hard grayish-green cemented CLAY
.. ;t with seams of gray Fine SAND (CUSP)
\
45 .. . it
... ~ 13/26/36
~
./
~ Hard grayish-green cemented, sandy CLAY (CL)
~
......: :
50 :~
. .... .
"~;;'/. 17/27/32 t
1".;" .'
55
60
65
Remarks Borehole Grouted
** Water Table not encountered within depth of 10.0' Casing Length 20.0'
1::1 r=!~ i
'DRIGGERS
ENGINEERING SERVICES
INCORPORA TED
Project No. DES 096338 BORING NO. B-3
Project Proposed Druid Road ALF, Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman J.R.
Completion DeWh To
Depth 75.3' Date 2/25/09 ater ** Time Date 2/25/09
~a: STANDARD
I-- tn zw....
LL. ..J W oa..~ PENETRATION TEST
0 ..J SOIL DESCRIPTION U)~z
x m a.. 3:ww BLOWS/FT. ON 2" O.D.
I-- ::E ::E o~a.. SAMPLER-140 LB.
0. >- c(
W tn ..J::E~ HAMMER, 30" DROP
a tn mc(O
SURF. EL: +42.8+/-' U):
CD 10 20 40 6080
0 0; t:...~.;.... Brownish-qrav Fine SAND with roots (SP)
:/:::: :
':",:::>:' Light gray Fine SAND with trace of roots (SP)
.... ..
. .....
. .....
.: .,,:.::
.... ..
...... Light brown Fine SAND
.... .. (SP)
. .....
. .....
........
.... ..
"'0"
..-. ..
. .....
5 . .....
".." Tan Fine SAND (SP)
. .....
. .....
.... ..
. ..... Very loose to loose tannish-brown to brown
..".' . 2/1/2 .
........
.... ..
...... Fine SAND (SP) \
.... ..
. .....
. .....
........
.... ..
......
.... .. 2/2/3
. .....
. .....
.-......
.... ..
......
.... ..
10 . .....
. ..... Loose dark brown Fine SAND (SP)
. ..... 1/2/3
........
.... ..
......
. ..... \
........
.... .. - trace of finely divided organic material
--..' .
. ..... 3/3/4
..',' . at depth 12.0'
........
::: :..:
. .....
. ..... Loose brown slightly silty Fine SAND (SP-SM)
I.r.) :1:,'.
15 " r D.l:
[~; :1:"1: 2/3/4
1:(1'.1"1 :
G .. ~ :1.:1:. /
I.r.) :1:':
": ~ ~:I :':"
'<<:'l Very loose light grayish-brown clayey Fine SAND /
880 (SC) /
.....</;
20 rz~ ~
z 1/1/1
~
.. ..../ \
~..
.... ./ \
~ Stiff dark brownish-green and gray cemented, \
~
sandy CLAY (CL) 1\
25 :. . .-: \:.
~ 2/5/9
~ \
:~";i \
~ Very stiff grayish-green cemented CLAY (CL)
30 \
~ 5/12/15 \
~
~.: Hard grayish-green cemented CLAY (1 )
. "::
. ."::
Remarks Borehole Grouted ( 1 ) with seams of gray Fine SAND (CUSP)
** Water Table not encountered within depth of 10.0' Casing Length 28.0'
1EIE!!~i <
DRIGGERS
Project No. DES 096338 BORING NO. B-3
Project Proposed Druid Road ALF, Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I
Completion
Depth 75.3'
l-
lL.
:J:
I-
Q.
W
C
35 bt ...
~..,
~
"/
~;/;
40 ~,
~
~
~%
~
~."
~.~.:...
: : :.'.
50 ~
/:
/:
/:
j
55 ~~
)~
: :"i:I
:o(:i:I
I
i
I
I
I
60
65
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
Foreman
Date
Depth To
Water
Time
2/25/09
..J U)
~ ~ SOIL DESCRIPTION
::E D.
>- ::E
U) :i
a; Ii
zwt-
ol1.U)
cntr::z
~ww
o~11.
..J::Ea;
al<(O
U):
CD
SURF. EL: +42.8+/-'
Hard grayish-green cemented CLAY
with seams of gray Fine SAND (CLlSP)
12/15/17
Hard grayish-green cemented CLAY (CL)
11/16/21
INCORPORA TED
J.R.
Date
2/25/09
STANDARD
PENETRATION TEST
BLOWS/FT. ON 2" 0.0.
SAMPLER-140 LB.
HAMMER, 30" DROP
10 20 40 60 80
\
\
\
\
20/26/50* * 0.5' Penetration
Hard grayish-green cemented, sandy CLAY (CL)
29/25/23
Hard light grayish-green cemented, sandy CLAY
with thin seams of cream colored LIMESTONE (CL)
/
/
/
.
\
15/29/50* * 0.3' Penetration
Cream colored LIMESTONE
50*
Cream colored LIMESTONE
i with trace of green cemented CLAY
50*
::r:
~
Remarks Borehole Grouted
** Water Table not encountered within depth of 10.0'
* 0.0' Penetration
* 0.5' Penetration
Casing Length
28.0'
1::I~~i
'DRIGGERS
ENGINEERING SERVICES
INCORPORA TED
Project No. DES 096338 BORING NO. B-3
Project Proposed Druid Road ALF, Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman J.R.
Completion De~h To
Depth 75.3' Date 2/25/09 ater ** Time Date 2/25/09
~O:: STANDARD
I- UJ zw....
LL ..J W On.~ PENETRATION TEST
0 ..J SOIL DESCRIPTION tJ)~z
:x:: m D.. ~ww BLOWS/FT. ON 2" O.D.
I- :::lE ::E O~n. SAMPLER-140 LB.
a.. >- c(
w tJ) ..J:::lE~ HAMMER, 30" DROP
Q UJ metO
SURF. EL: +42.8+/-' tJ):
CD 10 20 40 6080
-,-L, Cream colored LIMESTONE I
g ~ with trace of green cemented CLAY I I
70 50* * 0.5' Penetration
-'-r
5:
;r
:I Cream colored weathered, clayey LIMESTONE
75 ~ ~ 0.3' Penetration
50*
80
85
90
95
100
Remarks Borehole Grouted
** Water Table not encountered within depth of 10.0' Casing Length 28.0'
1::1 Et!~ i
'DRIGGERS
Project No. DES 096338 BORING NO. 8-4
Project Proposed Druid Road ALF, Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I
Completion
Depth
t-
u.
:I:
t-
D..
W
C
1)
~; ~\~~~.~
......
.... .-
......
-.". ..
. ...-.
. .....
5
--..--
..0. __
. ...-.
. .".".
.... -.
..". ..
. .....
. .....
...- .
. .-.-.
.... ..
.... -.
. .-.-.
. .....
10
.... ..
. .....
-:=:. .
..
....~
. ".
..-.:: r
15
J:.~~:t..
o:r~H:
c:~'~:'t:
eel :r t:
~,:;"n:
S~~~: r
':~~ .:!:!:
20
25
wm
Ilill
ENGINEERING SERVICES
Foreman
51.5'
Depth To
Water
Time
Date
2/26/09
..J en
o w
m ..J
:E D..
>- :E
en ;:j
0:::0::
zwt-
OD..en
eno:::Z
~ww
O~D..
..J:ED::
m<(O
en=
CD
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SURF. EL: +44.0+/-'
Light brownish-gray Fine SAND with some roots
,(SP)
Very loose to loose very light gray Fine SAND
(SP)
5/5/5
1/2/2
2/4/5
Medium dense very light gray Fine SAND
with seams of brown Fine SAND (SP)
Loose to medium dense dark brown Fine SAND
with trace of finely divided organic material
(SP)
3/5/7
2/3/5
3/4/9
Medium dense dark brown slightly organic,
slightly silty Fine SAND (SP-SM)
4/8/12
Very loose light grayish-brown silty,
slightly clayey Fine SAND (SM)
1/0/1
Very loose light brownish-gray silty Fine SAND
(SM)
1/0/1
'1-1-'
:1;1
IUll:l
~ Firm light grayish-green CLAY (CH)
30 ~
~
~ Very stiff to hard grayish-green cemented (1)
Remarks Borehole Grouted (1) CLAY (CL)
** Water Table not encountered within depth of 10.0'
2/3/3
INCORPDRA TED
J.R.
Date
2/26/09
STANDARD
PENETRATION TEST
BLOWS/FT. ON 2" O.D.
SAMPLER-140 LB.
HAMMER, 30" DROP
10 20 40 60 80
/
I
\
\
\
\
1/
,
1\
\
\
\
'\
/
/
/
/
("
\
\
\
\
~
",,-
~
'"
Casing Length
20.0'
11::1 E!~ i
'DRIGGERS
ENGINEERING SERVICES
INCORPORA TED
Project No. DES 096338 BORING NO. B-4
Project Proposed Druid Road ALF, Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman J.R.
Completion De~h To
Depth 51.5' Date 2/26/09 ater ** Time Date 2/26/09
Q::O:: STANDARD
..... UJ zwt-
LL ..J W Oil.(/) PENETRATION TEST
0 ..J SOIL DESCRIPTION UJQ::z
::I: OJ 11. :;:ww BLOWS/FT. ON 2" 0.0.
..... ::E
no ::E O~ll. SAMPLER-140 LB.
w > c:( ..J::EQ::
C UJ (/) OJc:(O HAMMER, 30" DROP
SURF. EL: +44.0+/-' (/):
CD 10 20 40 6080
35 ~ Very stiff to hard grayish-green cemented CLAY "'-
~ (CL) i"l
~ 3/14/35 1
fT
@ /
I
40 ~
10/14/16
\
0 '\
45 ~ \
~ 12/24/28 ~
j
'l5 1/
~ Hard grayish-green variably cemented, sandy CLAY
~
....: : (CL) I
'jU
50 . .-
: ....... Ii
~a~/ 15/14/17
55
60
65
Remarks Borehole Grouted
** Water Table not encountered within depth of 10.0' Casing Length 20.0'
1::l1E!~ i
DRIGGERS
t-
u..
:I:
t-
D..
W
o
o
5
...r
..
.... d" r
10 ........
. .....
. .....
'0". ..
. ---".
tra .~.: t:.
15 ~(:I~.t:
t~'~:'r:
co."!:
"i:.,'n:
1-:..... .
S~':t :: E:
':~~ :".!::
20
IITI,
1I11
WITI
25 lUll
...J U)
o w
CD ...J
:E D..
>- :E
U) :i
i": ~ ':!-:
. "..-.
.... ..
'.. 0"'
. 0" 0_'
.... ..
. __0"'
.... -.
. ...".
'_..0'
_.0. ..
lilll
1111
ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORATED
Foreman
Date
Depth To
Water
Time
Project No. DES 096338 BORING NO. 8-5
Project Proposed Druid Road ALF, Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I
Completion
Depth 51.5'
2/26/09
SOIL DESCRIPTION
~ti
zw....
OQ.~
(/)~z
3:Ww
O~Q.
..J::t~
metO
(/):
(0
SURF. EL: +44.7+/-'
Brownish-gray Fine SAND with trace of roots
\(SP)
Brownish-qray and liqht arav Fine SAND (SP)
Very loose to loose very light gray Fine SAND
(SP)
2/2/2
1/2/3
2/4/5
Loose to medium dense brown Fine SAND (SP)
2/2/4
2/3/3
2/4/8
Medium dense dark brown slightly organic,
slightly silty Fine SAND (SP-SM)
5/9/13
Very loose grayish-brown
to light grayish-brown silty Fine SAND (SM)
2/2/2
0/0/0
11:1,1:1:
11:1:1:1:
/1111
2G.' Stiff grayish-green cemented, sandy CLAY (CL)
30~
~.....
.,-. ,..
~
~ Stiff grayish-green weakly cemented CLAY (CL)
Remarks Borehole Grouted
** Water Table not encountered within depth of 10.0'
1/3/9
J.R.
Date
2/26/09
STANDARD
PENETRATION TEST
BLOWS/FT. ON 2" O.D.
SAMPLER-140 LB.
HAMMER, 30" DROP
10 20 40 6080
.
.
\
\.
/
\
\.
\
\
I'.
/
/
/
/
~
I
I
I
J
\
\
\
\
\
Casing Length
20.0'
lEI E!!Eii
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES
IN CORPORA TED
Project No. DES 096338 BORING NO. 8-5
Project Proposed Druid Road ALF, Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman J.R.
Completion De~h To
Depth 51.5' Date 2/26/09 ater ** Time Date 2/26/09
0::0:: STANDARD
t- U) zw....
U. ..J W oD..CI) PENETRATION TEST
0 ..J SOIL DESCRIPTION Cl)O::z
:I: CD D.. =:ww BLOWS/FT. ON 2" 0.0.
t- :E
c.. ::&: o~D.. SAMPLER-140 LB.
w >- c:( ...J::&:O::
c U) U) alc:(O HAMMER, 30" DROP
SURF. EL: +44.7+/-' CI):
CD 10 20 40 6080
35 ~ Stiff grayish-green weakly cemented CLAY (CL) I
3/3/9 ~
~ \
\
~ Very stiff to hard grayish-green cemented CLAY \
(CL) \
40 ~ \
8/13/15
~ '"
'"
~ ""-
~ '"
45
~ 12/50* * 0.5' Penetration
1/
~ 1/
~ Very stiff dark grayish-green cemented,
~
....: : sandy CLAY (CL) /
50 :.V1 .1/
:~";:.) 6/12/17
~... .
55
60
65
Remarks Borehole Grouted
** Water Table not encountered within depth of 10.0' Casing Length 20.0'
:
1::l1E!~ i
DRIGGERS
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
IN CORPORA TED
.
HAND AUGER BORlNGIHAND CONE SOUNDING LOG
PROJECT: CLIENT:
Proposed Druid Road ALF JA Churchill LLC
Clearwater, Florida WATER TABLE: DATE:
Proiect No.: DES 096338 See "Note" 2/26/08
TECHNICIAN: DATE: I COMPLETION DEPTH:
J.R.lM.H. 2/26/08 6.0'
LOCATION: TEST NUMBER:
See Plate I B-3
-.J HAND CONE TIP
ELEV. DEPTH 0 RESISTANCE (TSF)
DESCRIPTION m
(FT) (FT) :E
>-
rn 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Surface Elevation: +42.8+/-' 0 . .; .".-;
~ :':--:/:-
Brownish-gray Fine SAND with roots ;"r. 't.......
.I. _. "
(SP) :". ~ tf~~ .
Light gray Fine SAND : ",/: 0.: . -------- ~
42 with trace of roots (SP) -----..........
"0: : ::-: ~
1 .. 00 I--..
,000 \
.0,.. .
::--:. : :.
..' . 00
'0 ,"
0", .
.0... .
... .
'. : : :" :
'0 ,"
00. .
..,.. .
41 :r. : : : 0
..' . . .
'0' .
2 .0,'
..... . /
... .
..... .
'~'., . .
00. .
.0,... . \
:::: \:.
'0. . . .
00."
'0.'" ..
40 ... .
'0 : '/: '. :
... . I\.
3 00. .
. . If
Light brown Fine SAND (SP) .... .
00. .
...... ..
... .
........ . I
..' .. . .
... .
00. .
.0.... .
... .
....... .
..' .. o.
... .
39 00. .
.0.... ..
.... .
...... .
4 ..' .. . .
... .
00. .
....... .. \
.... .
...... .
..' . . .
... .
.0. .
.0.... .
... ..
....... .. /
.." . . .
.... .
00. .
38 ....... ..
... .
...... .
..' .. . .
5 .. ,"
Tan Fine SAND (SP) '0. .
.0. . /
.0.... ..
.... ..
..... .
..' . . . (
"". .
.". "
...." .
... "
..".. .
.... .. . .
... .
37 .'. .
...... .
... .
..... .
6 ..' .. . .
Note: Water Table not encountered
within depth of 6.0'.
36
7
.
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
ATTERBERG
BORING DEPTH DESCRIPTION W% Yd G, LIMITS P.P. V.C. CON. G.S. ORG. pH CI. S04 RES.
NO. (ft) (pef) (Isf) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (Ohm-em)
LL PL SL
8-1 4.0-55 Very light gray Fine SAND .
8-' 20.0-21.5 Grayish-brown silty, slightly clayey Fine SAND 28.3 NP NP ..
14.6
8-2 15.0-16.5 Dark brown Fine SAND .
8-2 25.0-26.5 Gray >andy ('LA Y 53.5 89 29 2.50 ..
5:10
8-3 10.0-11.5 Dark brown Fine SAND .
B-3 20.0-21.5 Light grayish-brown clayey Fine SAND 29.1 )1 2.1 ..
17.3
B-4 15.0-16.5 Dark brown slightly organic, slightly silty Fine SAND 4.1
B-4 30.0-31.5 Light grayish-green CLA Y 69.3 106 42 2.75 ..
89.8
8-5 25.0-26.5 Light grayish-brown silty Fine SAND .
DRI-2A 3.0 Very light gray Fine SAND .
W% Water Content Con. Consolidation Test
Y d (pef) Dry Density G.S. (+1) Grainsize Analysis (Hydrometer)
Gs Specific Gravity ORG.(%) Organic Content CLIENT: lA. Churchill. LLC
LL Liquid Limit CL (ppm) Total Chloride
PL Plastic Limit S04 (ppm) Total Sulfate PROJECT: Proposed Dnlid Road ALF.
SL Shrinkage Limit RES. (ohm-em) Lab Resistivity Clearwater. Florida
P.P. (tsf) Pocket Penetrometer See Test Curves FILE: DES 096338
u.e Unconfined Compression " Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve
, .
.
'.
GRAINSIZE ANALYSES
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
U. 5 Slandlrd so- ()pent.... in Inchn
U 5 Stanclard SiwI Numbets
H~-..
30
3 2 I. I , t J 4 6 10 .. I. 20 JO 40 ~ 70 100 140
I I - T .. I'
.
'\
\
\
\
. 1\
\
\
- \
m'.~t
. I
i~. ,- - --+
I I
100
90
80
70
-
&.
III
~60
~
~ 50
;;:
C
..
~ 40
l.
20
10
o
100
005
05 01
Gr8in Size in Millimeters
SAND
Medium
0.01
0.005
10
5
50
GRAVEL
Fine
SILT or CLAY
umber
Depth
Natural
Moisture
CLIENT:
J.A. Churchill, LLC
Classification
P. L
P. I.
LL.
B-1
Very light gray Fine SAND
PROJECT:
Proposed Druid Road ALF,
Clearwater, Florida
4.0' - 5.5'
FILE:
DES 096338
.
.
o
10
20
30
i:
...
40 ~
>-
D
t
50 ~
'"
o
u
'E
60 ~
t
Q..
70
80
90
100
0001
umber
B-2
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
3 2 + 1 + 3 4 6 10 14 16 20 30 co !lO 70 100 ICO '0
, I I -~. I
"\
"
.
'\
\.
\
\
\
\
.
- \
-- --- -
_._---- ,1, t - --+
i I . ! I
I
u, S St8ndw1l Siww Opemnll in Inches
U S Standard ~ Number1
100
90
so
70
~
III
'0; 60
~
~
~ 50
;;:
C
II
~ 40
rf.
30
20
10
o
100
10
5
05 01
Grain Size in Millimeters
SAND
Medium
50
GRAVEL
Fine
Depth
15.0' - 16.5'
Natural
Moisture
L L,
P. L
P. I.
Classification
Dark brown Fine SAND
Hydrometer
005
001
0005
SILT or CLAY
CLIENT:
J.A. Churchill, LLC
PROJECT:
Proposed Druid Road ALF,
Clearwater, Florida
FILE:
DES 096338
.
.
o
10
20
30
~
..
40 ~
>-
&J
~
50 ~
..
o
u
C
60 ..
~
..
~
70
80
90
100
0001
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
U. S Standwd SioM Opemnp in Inches
U. S Standard Siew Numben
Hydl'lllMler
C
II
~ 40
If
3 2 It I I f ] 4 , 10 .4 " 20 JO 40 !lO 10 100 140
I I I , - I
......
\
\
I
.
-
---~ I
-- - . -' t
---. -- ,~ I ' --+
I I . I I
100
90
80
70
-
.z:
III
'ii 60
~
~
..
~ 50
i.:
30
20
10
o
100
005
5
05 01
Grain S'ze ,n M,lIlmeters
SAND
Medium
50
001
10
0005
GRAVEL
Fine
SILT or CLAY
umber
Dept h
Natural
Moisture
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
J.A. Churchill, LLC
Proposed Druid Road ALF,
Clearwater, Florida
P. L
P. I.
Classification
LL.
8-3
10.0' - 11.5'
Dark brown Fine SAND
FILE:
DES 096338
.
.
o
10
20
30
-'=
..
40 ~
,.,
&>
~
.,
50 ~
~
u
C
60 ~
~
~
70
80
90
100
0,001
DRIGGERS ENGIN~ERING SERVICES, INC.
U. 5 SUncWd SioM ()penonp in Inchn
U 5 SQndard ~ Numtlers
Hydrometer
10
3 2 I. I J ~ 4 J 4 6 10 14 .. 20 JO 40' 50 70 100 140 ~
I T ........ , ,
.
1\
\
~
\
\
.
\
\
.
\
\
\
I
.
r-. .
--e-. --.- - t
I --+
.1 l'
II I I
100
90
80
70
...
.r.
M
.- 60
~
~
~ 50
ii:
C
AI
~ 40
&.
30
20
o
100
so
5
10
Q5 01
Grain Size In Millimeters
SAND
Medium
0.05
001
0005
GRAVEL
Fine
SILT or CLAY
umber
Dept h
Natural
Moisture
CLIENT:
J.A. Churchill, LLC
P. L
P. I.
Ll.
Classification
8-5
25.0' - 26.5 I
Light grayish-brown silty Fine SAND
PROJECT:
Proposed Druid Road ALF,
Clearwater, Florida
FILE:
DES 096338
. Il I, _
o
10
20
30
1:
..
40 ~
>-
&J
t
50 ~
..
o
U
c:
60 ~
~
70
80
90
100
0001
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
U. S StIlndwd so... Openon.. in Inc....
U S S18nclard Siew Numben
Hydrometet
10
3 2 I~ 1 , . J 4 6 10 u ,. 20 50 40 50 70 100 140 la
I' I I I I ,.... I"
\,
\
\
I
.
- \ .
n\ 1 --
--f--.
-Ii.. . j. --+-
I I
100
90
80
70
-
.s:.
III
'ij 60
~
~
~ 50
LA:
C
II
l: 40
If
30
20
o
100
50
10
5
05 01
Grain Size in MIllimeters
SAND
Medium
005
001
0005
GRAVEL
Fine
SILT or CLAY
umber Oept h Natural L L. P. L P. I. Classification
Moisture CLIENT: J.A. Churchill, LLC
DR! 3.01 Very light gray Fine SAND PROJECT: Proposed Druid Road ALF,
-2A
Clearwater, Florida
FILE: DES 096338
. III:, .
o
10
20
30
~
...
40 ~
>-
D
~
..
50 ~
..
o
U
C
60 ..
u
~
<>.
70
80
90
100
0001
. .
,
.
METHOD OF TESTING
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
. .
>>
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
AND
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
140 LB.
HAMMER
30" FALL
WATER TABLE
MUCK
4__"N" VALUE OR
6 BLOW COUNT
7
21
CLAYEY FINE SAND
SILTY FINE SAND
SHELBY TUBE
SANDY CLAY
STRATUM
CHANGE
CLAY
CLAYEY LIMESTONE
SANDY LIMESTONE
CORE RUN
LIMESTONE
50/0.3'
LOENOTES
50 BLOWS FOR
0.3' PENETRAT ION
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (ASTM D-1586)
In the Standard Penetration Test borings, a rotary drilling rig is
used to advance the borehole to the desired test depth. A viscous
drilling fluid is circulated through the drill rods and bit to stabilize the
borehole and to assist in removal of soil and rock cuttings up and out of
the borehole.
Upon reaching the desired test depth, the 2 inch 0.0. split-barrel
sampler or "split-spoon", as it is sometimes called, is attached to an N-
size drill rod and lowered to the bottom of the borehole. A 140 pound
hammer, attached to the drill string at the ground surface, is then used
to drive the sampler into the formation. The hammer is successively
raised and dropped for a distance of30 inches using a rope and
"cathead" assembly. The number of blows is recorded for each 6 inch
interval of penetration or until virtual refusal is achieved. In the above
manner, the samples are ideally advanced a total of 18 inches. The sum
of the blows required to effect the final 12 inches of penetration is called
the blowcount, penetration resistance of "N" value of the particular
material at the sample depth.
After penetration, the rods and sampler are retracted to the ground
surface where the core sample is removed, sealed in a glass jar and
transported to the laboratory for verification of field classification and
storage.
SOIL SYMBOLS AND CLASSIFICATION
Soil and rock samples secured in the field sampling operation were
visually classified as to texture, color and consistency. Soil
classifications are presented descriptively and symbolically for ease of
interpretation. The stratum identification lines represent the
approximate boundary between soil types. In many cases, this transition
may be gradual.
Consistency of the soil as to relative density or undrained shear
strength, unless otherwise noted, is based upon Standard Penetration
resistance values of ''N'' values and industry-accepted standards. "N"
values, or blowcounts, are presented in both tabular and graphical form
on each respective boring log at each sample interval. The graphical
plot of blow count versus depth is for illustration purposes only and does
not warrant continuity in soil consistency or linear variation between
sample intervals.
The borings represent subsurface conditions at respective boring
locations and sample intervals only. Variations in subsurface conditions
may occur between boring locations. Groundwater depths shown
represent water depths at the dates and time shown only. The absence
of water table information does not necessarily imply that groundwater
was not encountered.