Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2008-08027
r J' s" FLD2008-08027 1698 GULF TO BAY BLVD COLONIAL BANK PLANNER F RECORD: N T ENTERED ATLAS # 288B ZONING: C LAND USE: CG RECEIVED: 0$/12/2008 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DEC CDB: CLWCoverSheet Authorization For Disbursement Date:9l25/2008 Time:3:54 PM Vendor/Payee name: Hole Montes, !nc 2nd line vendor/payee name: 405 Commerical Court, Suite E Remit to: Street / P© Box Venice, FI 34292 Remit to: City, State, Zip Code Purchase orders are required for payments in excess of $2,500. Purchase Orders are required if prior year payments or expected payments have or will exceed $2,500. P.O. HUMBER (if required) RELEASE RECEIPT Provide a description or reason for this expense: Case FLD2008-08027 has be voided refund for Fire fee $200.00 & Flexible Commerical Application $1,205.00. If you are charging more than one account please provide additional description for each account: CHARGE TO ACCOUNT # AMOUNT TO CHARGE 1 FLD2008-08027 - 1698 Gulf to Ba Blvd 001000000341262000 1.,205.00 2 FLD2008-48027 - 1698 Gulf to Bay Blvd 001000000342501000 200.00 3 O.oa 4 0.00 5 0.00 6 0.00 7 O.oo 8 0.00 9 0.00 1a o.oo 11 0.00 12 0.00 13 0.00 14 0.00 15 0.00 16 0.00 Grand Total 1,405.00 ~. ull Si nature ~. of person authorized to sign Purchase Order Receiver Copy: Print Nanie and Title of person signing -3 ~~ ~, Tr`~r- L .r. IEi.~ }'~-~ ~C2. Print this form and attach the original document(s) that validate the amount you are requesting payment for. Attach any copies that must be sent with the check. Improperly completed forms will delay check request. Please explain below if you are requesting the Finance Department nat to mail check to the vendor. PLEASE MAIL A COPY OF THIS FORM TO THE CUSTOMER. ~ Keyed Creetetl by W-M. Tedder BlankrefundsExample City Clerk Document # 9821-0002 S~,At~~ ,.I.. ~ r T..ine jtems: Case No Receipt #: 1200800000000006469 Date: OS/12/2008 9125/2008 3:12:S1PM Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2008-08027 Fire -Prelim Site Plan 001000000342501000 200.00 FLD2008-08027 04 Flexible Commercial 001000000341262000 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,405.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check HOLE MON'TES INC R_D 42186 In Person 200.00 Cheek HOLE MONTES INC R D 42122 In Person 1,205.00 Payment Total: $1,405.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cRccci~Lrpl Page L of 1 , .M ~~~W ~~ ,i.. ~~ ~ °'9 _'- ~~~!T ~ PAYMENT HISTORY: FLD2008-08027 1698 GULF TO BAY BLVD Receipt Check Number Number Flexible C©mmercial 08/12/200 1200800000000006469 42186 Fire -Prelim Site Plan Assessed Paid $1,2a5.oo $1,205.00 ~( ~~ 1,205.00 08/12/200 1200800000000006469 42186 $200.00 $200.00 ~:~ Zoo.oa Fee Summary: Totai Assessed Total Paid $1,405.00 $1,405.00 Balance Due $0.00 $o.ao Balance Due $0.00 CaseP ayment H istory. rpt ~~~61Np 1..r 4 Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562865 J3'1 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ~ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE ER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) * NOTE: 75 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS 51TE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/24/2007) ~1PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PRO APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER COLONIAL BANK, N.A. 4144 N. ARMENIA AVE., TAMPA, FL. 33607 813-350-8008 FAX NUMBER: 813-864-0326 727-366-0881 EMAIL: Dan. Jenkins@colonialbank.com PROPERTY OWNER{S}: COLONIAL BANK, N . A . List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: 'PERRY W . LIBY, P . E . MAILING ADDRESS: 405 COMMERCIAL COURT, SUITE "E", VENICE, FL 34292 PHONE NUMBER: 941-412- 3712, ext.2226 FAX NUMBER: 941-412-3470 CELL NUMBER: 239-273- 3175 EMAIL: TerryLiby@HMeng.com PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COLONIAL BANK - GULF. TO BAY 1698 GULF TO BAY, CLEARWATER, 14-29-15-00000-130-0500 1698 GULF TO BAY BLVD FLD2008-08027 4-202.A} PROJECT VALUATION: $ FL. 33755 1.12 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 4 8 , 9 7 6 . 5 s . f . See attached cagy of Existing Conditions P].an, dwg. 3 PROPOSED USE(S): Cammercia~. General - Bank w/Drive-Thru DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Convert Existing Krispy'Kreme Huilding (4,665 s.f.) into a Branch Hank w/3 Drive Specifically identify the request -Thru lanes w/ 1 ATM lanes. Allow existing parking to remain in the setback along (include number of units or square Duncan Ave . ehan es to the footage of non-residential use and all g parking areas included modifying the existing area @ requested code deviations; e.g. the entrance off Gulf to Bay & the parking area along the north side of the reduction in required number of parking spaces, SpeCiflC uSe, etc.) Proposed drive-thru area resulting in 18 less parking spaces & increase landscape C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 1 of S COLONIAL BANK Zoning: C atlas# 2888 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TD R), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ~ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ~ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses io the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed project is a redevelopment of existing building & parking. The Building will remain same size with interior/exterior changes including the relocation of existing drive-thru & adding a 3 Drive-thru lanes w/ATM lane. The finish project will be an enhancement & consistent with adjacent properties 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The adjacent properties are already developed, however the proposed project will not hinder any future redevelopment potential or Che value of adjacent properties. In-fact the proposed redevelopment of this property will only enhance the adjacent properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed redevelopment will consist of all construction being conducted on-site. The existing entrances along Gulf to Bay and S. Duncan will not be changed, therefore the health.& safety of persons in the area will not be adversely affected. Note; reduction in the parking area at the east entrance will provide 4. a a. Iona s ac ing so as o minimize impac s o u o ay ra ic. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed redevelopment of the property will not alter traffic patterns along the adjacent roadways. The internal traffic pattern will be changed to allow for the drive-thru lanes ~ the rear of the Bank. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed redevelopment will be consistent with the adjacent west parcel, Feoples Bank. The redevelopment of the parcel will be consistent with intent of the zoning, landuse and character of the community. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The redevelopment of the parcel's building and internal traffic patterns are being designed to minimize the adverse effects on adjacent properties including the visual and acoustical impacts as well as the hours of operation. C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) >$~ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use andlor development standards set forth in this zoning district. The redevelopment of the property would not be practical. if deviations from building setbacks for the existing parking and the changes to the drive-thru were not granted. 2. The development or redevelopment v,riU be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district The redevelopment of the property for use as a bank facility will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the current code and zoning for this area. 3. The deve9opment or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement. of surrounding properties. The redevelopment of this parcel will not impede any redevelopment or other improvements to surrounding properties. 4. ,Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The adjoining properties will not be impacted as a result of the proposed redevelopment: of this parcel. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses,. will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spat land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new andlor preservation of a working waterfront use. The current property is vacant. The proposed redevelopment use of the property is permitted as a flexible development use under the zoning. The redevelopment of this parcel will provide an economic contributor to the City's economic Base. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. -The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a subskantial number of the following design elements: $I Changes in horizontal building planes; j~J Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ~] Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and $ll Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The proposed redevelopment of this parcel will provide an enhanced building exterior & landscape design incorporating the existing trees and other landscape materials. C:1DOCUments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 0424-07.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ~I A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include~a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. )~ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ^ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ~ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ~ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ~ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ^ Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ~ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWI=WMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ~ Copy of SWFWMD - Pre-application meeting attached . ~ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevaticns shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. . If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property} -One original and 14 copies; See Existing Conditions Plan, Drawing No. 3' ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, x including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed} -please design around the existing trees; 1=t TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; See Note - Site & Landscape Plans "Arborist to inspect trees prior to any reconstruct activity ~ LOCATION MAP OF THtr PROPERTY; Property Location Map - See Cover Sheet, Drawing No. 1 ~ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction vrith a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shalt be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study v~ill be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Two Copies of Traffic Study submitted per approved methodology ~] Rqq~~ING PLAN as a plicabl ~efer to pavi~g, U'erading & Drainage Plan - Drawing. No. 6 ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:IDOCUments and Setiingslderek.fergu5onlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD} 04-24-07.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section. 4-202.A) ~ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): X Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; X North arrow; R Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; X All dimensions; X Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; NA Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; X All required setbacks, X All existing and proposed points of access; . X All required sight triangles; X Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easemenks; X Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; X Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; x All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; X Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; X Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; X Location of all landscape material; X Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; X Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and X- Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabular form: ~ Land area in square feet and acres; X Number of EXISTING dwe]ling units; NA Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; R Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the X' number of required spaces; Total paved area, including ail paved parking spaces & driveways, % expressed in square feet 8 percentage of the paved vehicular area; x Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; X Building and structure heights; x Impermeable surface raiio (LS.R.); and X Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN io scale (8 % X 11); EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED 48,976.5 --- 48,976.50 1 --- 1 NA NA 4,665.1 4,665.1• 49+ 2 HC= 51 19 26+2 HC = 28 30,492 = 63% --- 28,314 = 58°s (Refer to Dwg. 3 - Existing Conditions Plan) (Architectural Elevations) a.72 0.67 0.10 0.10 ~ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: X One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; x Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; X All open space areas; ' NA Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; R Lot fines and building lines (dimensioned); X Streets and drives (dimensioned); X_ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); NA Structural overhangs; C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ~ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): X All existing and proposed structures; X Names of abutting streets; NA Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ~- (Refer to Paving, Grading, &. Drainage Plan, Drawing No. 6 X Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; (Refer to Landscape Plan) NA Sight visibility triangles; NA Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Refer to Site Plan, DWG. 4 X Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ tree survey); Refer to Existing Tree Plan, DWG. No. L-2 Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant X schedule; Refer to DWG. L-1 X Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and X protective measures; (Refer to Landscape Plan) x Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; NA Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); X Irrigation notes. ~ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11}; ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ~ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the follov~ing information; X All sides of all buildings; X Dimensioned; x Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); X Materials; NA Sight visibility triangles; ~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/2 X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS 1 Section 3-1806) NA - Signage Permit to be Submitted Separately ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address {numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/ X 11) (color}, if submitfing Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:1Documents and Settingslderek,fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ~ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager cr hislher designee or if the proposed development: ~I Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Transportation Analysis per method approved by Traffic Operations Staff Traffic Impaci Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Lmpact Study is not required. L. FIRE FLOW CALGULATIONSI WATER STUDY: NA Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required. fire sprinkler, standpipe andlor fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 {Annex H) is required. ~ Acknowledgement of fire flow cafculationslwater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow CalculationsllNater Study is included. Fire Flow CalculationsMlater Study is not required • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ^ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour andlor 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment andlor intersection with five (5} reportable accidents within the prior twelve {12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-841 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS! WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have quesiions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: x. I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph tJ~operJy described in this application. Signature ~f property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINF,LLAS~ Sworn to a d subscribed before me this day of A. D. 20~~_ to me andlor by who is personally known has produced as identification. _ MRLY NUii~Z I[r018ry PIt6NC - Stet! M Notary pub~c, - My commissran expires: Casion tl p0 698306 C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: Colonial Bank N.A. 2. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address ar general location): 1698 Gulf To Bay Blvd. 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) Reconstruction of the building interior & exterior, modify drive lanes and adding drive-thru facility, and enhanced landscaping. 4. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Terry W. Liby, P.E.; Hole Montes, Inc. as (hisRheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has•been executed to induce the City of Glearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That ~lwe}, t nde sig d authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ~. ro e , Owner p rty n Jenkins, AVP Pro e Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by a laws of the State of Florida, on this day of _~~ personally appeared In ~,n,('y~,l('li '~ who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that helshe fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. k11LLY SINIAEZ MQMy irbNC • 8ltilts Of Ft~s ' ' M~Colledt~/1otlEttpkrafNB'2d1~ otary Pu li Signature Notary Se ~ r ~ ~~ My Commission Expires: ~11r011a1 If/lOnq INOfNy Aql. C:1Documenis and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 8 of 8 R ~t' .~ f~ LL Planning Departmer ' ° ~ ~~~j~~~~ 900 South Myrtle Aver 11 ~I~~I Clearwater, Florida 33' Telephone: 727-562-4; ~ Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collafed, stapled and folded into sets COLONIAL BANK Zoning: C atlas# 2886 * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALt_ SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: {Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S):, List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: 1698 GULF TO BAY BLVD FLDZOOS-oso27 FAx NUMBER: 941-412-3470 EMAIL: COLONIAL BANK, N.A. 4144 NORTH ARMENIA AVE., TAMPA, FL 33607 813-350-8008 FAX NUMBER: 813-869-0326 727-366-0881 EMAIL: Dan Jenkins@colonialbank.com COLONIAL BANK, N.A. TERRY W. LIBY, P.E. 405 COMMERCIAL COURT, SUITE "E", VENICE, FL. 34292 239-273-3175 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. This sli ht1 enhanced landsca e lan includes sites and uantities of lant material which meet or exceed code minimum stardards. C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc Page 1 of 2 . ' 2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The vlant material Palette features a diverse combination of color and texture to enrich the Community character. 3. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The lush landscaping will enhance the appearance of the Bank and set the precedent for improvement of other properties in the immediate vicinity. 4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. There was no special area or scenic corridor plan with which to comply but require tiered foundation plantings have been proposed. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE. CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A GOMPREHENSIVE LANDSGAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS 1 ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAYBE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SlGNATU RE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in thi application. Signature of property owrie or represent 've STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PfMEtb~, LEE Swom to and subscribed before me this ,ZS'~lay of A.D. 20~ to me andlor by ~ ,who is one ly known has produ as iden fication. ~G Note public, My commission expires: """ I~iIS11NG.C/WNESTfiA .~~!4~.Y .A/~A~~. EXPIRES: Actober 22, 2011 sonaed Tnrv Notary PubNc llndem~lers C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplptanningforms_07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc Page 2 of 2 THIS FORM IS INTENDED TO FACILITATE ISiND GUIDE THE DIALOGUE DURING APRE-r. ~LiCATION MEETENG BY PROVIDING A PARTIAL "PROMPT LIST" OF DISCUSSION SUBJECTS. iT IS NOT A LIST OF REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE APPLICANT. '~ SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FILE NUMBER: 3w;,~~k RESOURCE REGULATION DIVISION ~"•~~'` ~ PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES Date: 1/25/07 Time: 11:00 Project Name: Colonial Bank Clearwater Attendees: David Kramer, Ter Lib Hole Montes County: Pinellas SeclTwplRge: 14/29/15 Total Land Acrea e: 1.12 Project Acrea e: <0.5 Prior On-SitelOff-Site Permit Activity: • A ears to bead retention area on-site Project Overview: • Partial redevelopment of an existing commercial site and construction of a bank building vn the northwest corner of Gulf to Ba and Duncan. ' Environmental Discussion: (Wetlands On-Site, Wetlands on Adjacent. Properties, Delineation, T&E species, Easements, Drawdown Issues, Setbacks, Justification, EiiminatioNReduction, PermanenUTemporary Impacts, Secondary and Cumulative Impacts, Mitigation Options, SHWL, Upland Habitats, Site Visit, etc.) • NIA Site Information Discussion: (SHW Levels, Floodplain, Tailwaker Conditions, Adjacent Off-Site Contributing Sources, Receiving Waterbody, etc. ) • Site dischar es to Allen Creek Water Quantity Discussions: {Basin Description, Storm Event, Pre/Post Volume, Pre/Post Discharge, etc.) • NrA Water Quality Discussions: {Type of Treatment, Technical Characteristics, IVon-presumptive Alternatives, etc.) • Maintain the existin treatment function rovided in the de ressional store a area. Sovereign Lands DISCUSSIGn: {Determining Location, Correct Form of Authorization, Content of Application, Assessment of Fees, Coordination with FDEP) • NIA Operation and MaintenaneelLegal Information: (Ownership or Perpetual Control, 08M Entity, O&M Instructions, Homeowner Association Documents, Coastal Zone requirements, etc.} • Provide roof of ownershi in the form of a deed or contract for sale. ' Application Type and Fee Required: • If they can demonstrate that the post-development project will have the same or less total and vehicular use area, than no permit required. • Submit two sets of construction drawin s and a detailed ra'ect descri tion/im envious area tabulation. Other: (Future Pre-Application Meetings, Fast Track; Submittal Date, Construction Start Date, Required District Permits - WUP, WOD, Well Construction, etc.) • ©ISClalmer: The District ERP pre-application meeting process is a service made available to the public to assist interested parties in preparing for submittal of a permit application. Information shared at pre-application meetings is superseded by the actual permit application submittal. District permit decisions are based upon information submitted during the application process and Rules in effect at the time the application is complete. CN -CALCULATIONS COLONIAL BANK -GULF TO BAY HM RROJECT # 2007.001 PRE-DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONS PROJECT SITE LAND US'E: AREA`..{AG} RUNOFF COEFFICIENT "C" PRODUCT C+x A BUILDINGS 0.11 0.95 0.10 IMPERVIOUS - ASPHALTISIDEWALKS, ETC 0.70 0.95 0.67 DRY DETENTION {SUMP 0.03 1.00 0.03 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 0.84 TOTAL PERVIOUS {GREEN AREAS 0.28 0.20 o.os TOTAL 1.12 0.86 "C" WEIGHTED AVERAGE _ 0.76 Terry W. Liby, PE 39856 Date CN -CALCULATIONS COLONIAL BANK -GULF TO BAY HM PROJECT # 2007.001 POST-DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONS PROJECT SITE: LAND':l7SE AREA (AC) RUNOFF COEFI=ICtENT; "C" t'ROIJUCT C:'x A BUILDINGS 0.11 0.95 0.10 IMPERVIOUS -ASPHALT/SIDEWALKS, ETC 0.65 0.95 0.62 DRY DETENTION (SUMP} 0.03 1.00 0.03 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 0.79 TOTAL PERVIOUS {GREEN AREAS} 0.33 0.20 0.07 TOTAL 1.12 0.82 "C" WEIGHTED AVERAGE _ 0.73 Terry W. Liby, PE 39856 Date SQL" 8/12/2008 ''I`' ~ Receipt #. 120080000000000b4b9 9:08:08AM ~ ~= r Date: 08/12/2008 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2008-08027 Fire -Prelim Site Plan. 001000000342501000 200.00 FLD2008-08027 04 Flexible Commercial 001000000341262000 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,405.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check HOLE MONTES INC R D 421.86 Check HOLE MONTES INC R D 42122 In Person In Person Payment Total: 2oo.oa 1,205.00 $1,405.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you viii be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.tpt Page 1 of 1 169$ GULF T~ BAY BLVD FLD2008l08027 S. Duncan Avenue 60.00' Right-of--Way Per DDT Right-of--Way Map Section No. 15040-2507 COLONIAL BANK Zoning: C EXIST, SIDEWALK f~ ~~ ~~~ ~$ u °o w h it _$ ~ ~u ~N~ ~ti ~ 0 a ~__ ~- _, 'ti--- ---~_-~ ' ,; ~ ~~ L-- J~ ~ v ~~~®~~~~ .Y7-rt~- Vim' kfr9~ ~k _- -- ,j ny~,` ~, '~ Y' ~ ~i .! 1S ~K:. -~~: I~__-- ~~__" -~ ~- r- t\ Pane! Identification Number: 14-29-IS-00000-130-0400 Z FEOPLESBANK Y w ~ z ~ a w 3 a a 0 ~ ~ w ~^ y a o 2 ~ ( ~ 4 U $ 6 = = a a y j m (/ 7 G U a ~ .'Y?:t •S': t _y T`~Y. ~`~ ~,~ ~~ G o ~~ ~,o~ ~ PROPOSE[a COLONIAL BANK One Story Masonry Building 1698 Gulf To Bay Boulevard Cleaswater, Florida 33755 Paxel JA #14-29-1 S-OD000.130~500 J,A61.1 SQ. f7: HtlpM1J.d' ~d97Q1.5$ FI: Avpapl J.II AfdSC F"wA.d FAw 61e~a5oR - 69.19 atlas# 2888 ~I ~- ~ ~ 0 ti f~ h O ~ $~ I ~ ~ ~ ~, 'Z Q C~~ O y0 C 0 I ~~ c7 a o ~~ 4~ _ ~o .. tip 6 ~ U ~ o L".~ Qn Q ~a Q ~ oa ~~_ ~moc Z ~ m ~ ~ J ~ Z Q W O ~ W r y W~~s~ N A ffi '~, ~ 8 e U v ~ ~ m ~_ ~ ti v = ~> m35 0 E cLLC~ a e ~ `$'~ O g~ d°- O = w im wa r~zs emanvc a.ozao-~ Nrw 71Ti 100LVmlarwas~~mVlU\500[0021[003\q1 ~TM Drs naa ' ~ a b 1 ~ n E E E V U N I`: 1120' 10' 0 20' ~-~~ Ii W 1, y~Y" T ~ ! +II i f I!~ TREES er.N Pal rIC PLANT LIST Ounntity Synbd Sdentifk Nnne Connon Nnne Plantk,p Size I Acer rebrun Nnple Existing 4 Laperstroenla IrWi[O Lrnpe Myrtle Exlstb,p 7 Ilex nt<enuotn 'East Pnlatka' 'East Palatka' Hdly 8' - ID'. 2' CAL. NIN 3 Roystonea slats ~ RoYal Pnln 18' - 20' 12 Sabel Pnlnetto Lnbbage Paln Ezistkq 5 _ Rex cossine Dohoon HUIy IO' - 12'. 2 I/2• CAL. MIN 3 , Ligustrun Japonkun Japnnese Privet ExlstMg 2 Nngrwlln graMlflora Southern Napnolh IO'-I2; 2 1/2' CAL. MIN 3 Nagrglln grnrWiflora Southern Mngndh Exlstirg 16 Ouercus vlrglNnrw Llve Dak Existing - _. SHRUec e.w r.Rn w,rnvro< Duantity Hatch Sdentifk None Cannon Nave ~ Height Planting Size 37 Alxasb colMornin Dmrf Elephant Enr - 3-Gal, FULL, 48' UC 290 ~ Uurnntn erectn 'Gold NwrtM' Durnntn 'Gold Hound' 18'-24' 3-Gnl., 36' OC s8 Nephrolepis fnlcatn 'Macho' 272 Raphblepls b,dko 126 Schefflero nrboricols Narlepatn' Mnc/a Fern D.nrf Inrann Hnethorn Vnrlegnted Dearf Schefflera 24'-36' 18'-24' 24'-36' 3-Ga6 36' DC 3 gaL, 24. OC 3-Gnl., 48• lTC 97 Trnchelospernrn ,gsnbrokies 23 Trlpsacun doctyloides Confedernte JnsNrxr Fnknhntchee Grnss 18'-24' 4' OAH 3-Cwt., 24' DC 3 got., 48' OC - I m W '~ a ' I ~' > ~ ~ QQbeM Bntleed0 ' NOwuV naAwOea ( , (N1omANrA Oanuwro _ mperyw pg~yMrna I i Z T S,Oewas• 3Tne Fpspeea ~ .~ N{~ ry I,AO~utMrA~oa,n ~ i I, Q 37nno ROWea ~ : `°° °I`4' - - - - -_ V ~ Z SIMC t,0e Lf! 8 OC . 72 HsiOS RpWnd AooeM Trees may t>e used toward shade tr6e calgdetiorl et 0 2:1 ro.aw"`°m ~ ~ I i. ~ •,3e smA. rioaeoa aOwr~Ax y ratio. Amer,t trees may trot a:mad 25% Of rogttired shade ~ . ~ ~ an trees. C~ i owMp ~1+s1aYMS[tFwuxrua ~ ~ I i I (n hmy t7581F/~. 7Tnim Npuiq . 77r.~s Peowee 18 Shade Trees Requited x 25%= 4 AOpeeOb AcoeM Trees ~ ~ i , eennc t150lFAe' o.c. •,iz slmms RePSed• NOTE = 2 Alxenl Trees ADPDed y ~ ~ 4 (,fiOWAle rAxAwAteeamaro IU OIRIMrrA+ttiYpep,p •IT1 Sh,b PrwNp ' E1DST9(° PL,1NT WTIJiIAL ~~ ~ EXCEEDS 7169 REOlAAE1@fl E~tug Sod b be replaced wOh new, SL Augustrne, Pahnetlp'. ~ i ~ VEHN IMR IaE AREA ArOentine eattla Sod to be 6,sW0ed et llotrOm d datmltbn area. .:. ~ ~ ~ c ~~ ~., . ' 119 Trtpsocun ilorHanw D.nrf Fnka/wtchee Grass 4' ONI 3 gnl., 48' DC I1 Ni awMr nlpMNrewrllarel RnIYM.pWAlS aLtEFgDN Im O WA4F rAxuwrOet IylAte Rsrou+MrA morra.o Aar r•rmea 0•wlbmnMa•Omr ~° p~~',''', OOo V 4 .Oa M7ewARP xAW 1,0)deLVrrA W c~ /P 16/enaAxrA'OOIDUOUOT~'----..~."._..-.•--_~...~._... ~-.-~=1~w __. itr GULF TO BAY BLVD ' i __ I --- - --- _ ~-_.- c_ -_ _ -•~ .~ l ---~~a.rre rw~r-- 'iE C ,pl(dp®wM1bbwene WeaOrari4dmebMa wmrromon Nm f~arrorrb. ,0 pYYip ryFSe pmr4bn n. mw. u Ir•n..r, I 'fihh - _ -- ,oT.a vmesf •Te, sf mandrap. a,m Rriaer.e - - .e7a SFddrt¢~. ieiRwfaod ~ I ~I iired150 tS tYTa mmnrpA•STram Rp}iad ~ W I ~ ~ .. . S Tree Rdlarn I ~ - ~ 7,°i~s„'°'Y0}" ~ FOUNDATION PLANTINGS: ~ br tOl/%d a tMrDdlrlg d I' ~ ~ ~ fa trgMage ekng sUeet ri~a-al-waY. rNUdn e '~ ~' ' . .. w - ... y ~ ~ .. ~ . mtrtlrnrart 5 wide farldsraps area Orn,tppee0 0l at bast Mo . ~ ~ ' ' . ~a I , i ~ .rJ ~ smart trees Ix 0vee palms fur every a0 Wrear feel d twlNbg }dr~owMr f uff mlaav!''j: o11uWt IOA ~~i i facade mtl me ahNb fpr eYmy 20 eglmm few Of required b d O. . ~ // fl ~pa 0Ba I ~ -_-_ ~ ~+- _- BulNirq Wade = 103' z 5' wW01= 515 SF ReQUGed ~ ;.-~ =600 SF Provided Tree Repukerrbnl = 103 LF! 40 LF = 3 Trees RegWred -- --- -- = 3 Trees PrOV10ed Shrub requiremem . 515 SF x .50 = Y58 SF Requited = 30o SF Provbed GrouMmver req„iten,mlt = 515 SF -256 SF= 257 SF RegWred ~~; =301 SF ProviOed The Carltralxn is to retain Oro aerviros O/ en approved ArbprL9t prla m mrLtOnrGlon t (n order m eruurre Ore quality end safety d extath,g trees On site to ren,ein. ~~r~ae. I o , I `~ I ij~ i/ ORAwIAC LY1RR£M n$ 01:' 11/D] COLONIAL BANK '~° ~ °"~ , , D7 405 COrrur,errdal tear. SuDa E ~~ W~ rircm¢r w. a..,,.. w ~~ Vmdce, FL 342sz ~+: Toot LSP 1698 ~ TO BAY BLVD. ~.. ~ ~" °' P''°"°'~°°"472"Z LANDSCAPE PLAN CIFARWAT6t FLORA HOLE MONTES ,ea .w~. um,~ ,eoza xa vm xa Q m..wxa rw .nrwrtcmw ww:cs o,roe .., t 1 07 aOr~ eareat ~~ Fbdda CartlOrate of ~ .a.,=~~" 2007001 .wan +mnrs arz r '464^x "'1` umcv[ IMprair5 Authpazalbn N0.1772 wm~mi 1 3 I i ~ , QN VM, DnA16 `.DEFiiFAl1 dTr vAn. corsmoare xvrtE ~} 1 psi rAnAw,rpFS mass Rlrra EYOpGpldrr Ta lYe~ acn nst wcce acv rJAa E4N ilAfA Ras ~P IIky. A 14'-Y &t!ie FLLK 0 1 ^e~~_ ~RF9. 1 E~{ ~~ T.~ j~~ ~+ ~. e. _"' G2 acKS: yet. nr asv. o n-d s,a~,~~ r' ~a~"'~ ~atv. a 1r-a' .~ dmti: 1rea~in File. a kY-o'- ta ~F ;_-.. ~, '~tuv: n a~~• - - 1 a~ ~d¢IV: ao x -s ~E.o. muss v &6,..grh M1u mrnr Ste- q),v, p le-b•~ ~rg .~nnsa.~._..._.~ an. o r-r o -a' C2 xul ,~ , r-o• ,~ r a socrtx >aFe eaz EIPI. n W-~ B 6 '#NI alv. 0 1$..~"y-0~ .~.?A_~fiL1+~F ttly. o r-r ~Rfiu~{14CR ynAt, 4 Bfi' 1 r n ~rno~es ~~~~ saa rn. cQrna-arty etv~ S'd74 Ps6sG $tY H'~9. Mfi.' ~E1 ~FICRd~ Psis - !4~ C7l4 RD 1Ytxi 9e;IDA. ip tRG Kti ~~ aQa ~mtiffAS+~a IC 4G'n ~ k[nsLVi S9`l fT ~ Po-'eAS ar.n mafo LE=I CRt12 affi ®'~ 0 fail k'.AL'_'4 4tV9JoT.C R`II ~ "L~§l'9 e1tM%iID t~ t1aft:'Of iME ill. uEL~ 6lFFJF"f. t111E1d ~ .12L,D ~.C: fGtbV]R PATSiL 10 R IPa/CtL 8k .kfiQAl:'I -.Li3.'.L "C R6caHn R~64: Fats +~H sv~ (IP£Ai4 tun mrn ta~c va ~ ~~n rxtt trs ssu;e cv~.. u"}i'9 ~ tfA.m sg2v .xcs 0 J I m °Q m O ~ ~ 0 ,' r~^ ~ V O ~ ^ i t~ I m 00 N ~~ ~I ~I i i I Y Q 07 J QU'I o ~' I ~ '~ i 0 ~ '' U N D P9 i 'r`r~ ~~ ~~ ',. ~~ LLB., ,~a~~ '' ~ ~ ~ ~~~ y 9 C Sts .~ ~~ ~-~ N I ~ ~~ ~~ ~O '~ ~~ ~~ o~ U C~7 = 6 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS COLONIAL BANKAT GULF TO BAY Prepared For HOLE MONIES, INC. N (~ ° ° ~ ~ ~ r~ r =o y o~ N00 ~ ~ O G7 D ~~ ~ O r Prepared By O ~ ~ 0 LINCKS c~ ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ Engineers -Planners v ~ ' Tampa, Florida ~ N W r C v i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 i TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS COLONIAL BANK AT {GULF TO BAY Prepared For HOLE MONTES, INC. Prepared By LINCKS ~ ASSOCIATES, INC. 5023 West Laurel Street Tampa, Florida 33607 $13-289-0039 State of Florida Authorization No. EB0004638 May, 2008 Project No. L07168 4~9F3~9V~ IX ~i1~~~4Y 96K1 {i ~c~g ~tl@Yio ~€ {~::. :'4 S~'iii, .n,. , r.,, ' ' .~r ' n , "2 _ . . ~ C ~3~ ~ ©a ~Wenr~P~~. ~ ~ . ~'.~ 'No. 1 55 ~~ . -~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~'c ~. , y ,`~ ' r ~ ' ~ ~, - L}ate~' .~ 7~+!. ii,~y < std',`, f . f `4~ 'Li . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Estimated Peak Hour Project Traffic ............................................................................... 1 Project Trip Distribution ................................................................................................... 4 Adjacent Roadways ......................................................................................................... 5 Buildout Year ................................................................................................................... 5 Study Area .............. ................................................. . ....................................................... 5 Background Traffic .......................................................................................................... 8 Intersection Analysis ...................................................................................................... 13 Generalized Link Analysis ............................................................................................. 17 Access Recommendations ............................................................................................17 Gonclusions ................................................................................................................... 19 LIST OF TABLES 1 Estimated New PM Peak Hour Trip Ends ....................................................................3 2 New PM Peak Hour Project Trip Distribution ................................................................6 3 Estimated Intersection Level of Service {Signalized) .................................................14 4 Estimated Intersection Level of Service {Unsignalized) .............................................15 5 Generalized Link Analysis ..........................................................................................18 6 Access Recommendations .........................................................................................20 LIST OF FIGURES 1 Project Location ....................................................................................:.........,.............2 2 Project Traffic ............................................................................................................... 7 3 Existing Traffic ..............................................................................................................9 4 Peak Season Traffic ...................................................................................................10 5 2009 Background Traffic ............................................................................................11 6 2009 Background Plus Project Traffc ........................................................................12 ~~9®t1D~~ Qi ~~~W'VaH~ fl ~a'f3g ~dW~e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t t 1 1 1 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to provide the Transportation Goncurrency Analysis for the proposed Colonial Bank located north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and west of Duncan Avenue in the City of Clearwater, as shown in Figure 1, The property has most recently been. utilized as an approximately 4,655.1 square foot Krispy Kreme. The developer proposed to remodel the existing building to accommodate a 4,655.1 square foot Colonial Bank with drive through windows. This analysis was done in accordance with the approved methodology dated January 22, 2008. ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC As discussed in the traffic methodology, the PM peak hour trip ends associated with the existing Krispy Kreme were based on the trip rates contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITEM Trip Generation, 7~h Edition, 2003. Based an this data the existing development would attract 94 trip ends during the PM peak hour with 47 inbound and 47 outbound, as shown in Table 1. Since the trip rate data contained in 1TE Trip Generation, for a bank is not refiective of the banking industry today, the trip rate for the proposed bank was estimated based on studies of banks conducted by Lincks & Associates, Inc. in the Tampa Bay area. During L~6~9G1CS & ASS~Cf~TES, BtrIC. 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 ri 1 1 t 1 1 FIGURE 9 PRO~~e-~ ~oc,ar~oN ~9N~BC5 & dSSOO1,~TESo 9NC. 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ wrr. ~, r ~ ~ . .~ r~r ~ ~ r ~ ~ ^^r a~ w TABLE 1 ESTIMATEd IVEW PM PEAK HOUR TRlP ENDS Trip PM Peak Flour ate 1 Winds (1) Scenario Land Use Size fn Out Total Passerby New PM Peak Haur Ci~pEure (2) Trf Ends in Out Total In Out ~`ota " Existing Krispy Kreme 4,665.1 SF 20.p/1,000 SF ~7 47 J4 23 23 46 24 24 48 Proposed Bank with Drive Through Window 4,665.1 SF 5.38/1,000 5F 12 13 25 3 3 6 9 10 19 Difference <35> c34> <59> <15> <14> <29> (1) Trip generation for the existing Krispy Kreme was based on ITE Tri Generation, 7~` Edition and trip generation for the proposed Colonial Bank was based on studies conducted by Lincks $ Associates, Inc. at banks in the Tampa Bay area. (2) It is estimated that 50°rb Qf the Krispy Kreme's trip ends are passerby and 26.9% vfthe bank trip ends are passerby. + Krispy Kreme 94 x 0.50 = 47 Use 46 • Bank 25 x 0.269 = 6 • The passerby trip ends should not exceed 10% of adjacent street traffic. 1,446(a) x 0.10 = i45 > 6 (a) Based an the fuming movement count conducted at the intersection Avenue. of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Duncan ~11~ACKS &.A550C~1tAT~S, 1~9C, 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 the PM peak hour, the proposed bank would attract 25 trip ends with 12 inbound and 13 outbound, as shown in Table 1. In addition, according to studies conducted in the ITE T_ rip Generation Handbook, 2"d Edition and independent trip characteristics studies conducted by Lincks & Associates, Inc., a percentage of the traffic associated with the existing and proposed uses would already be on the adjacent roadways. However, the passerby trip ends are not expected to exceed 10% of the adjacent street traffic. As shown in Table 1, based on the passerby capture, the existing use would attract 48 new PM peak hour trip ends with 24 inbound and 24 outbound and the proposed land use would attract 19 new trip ends during the PM peak hour with 9 inbound and 10 outbound. As a result of the change in land use, the proposed development would result in a net decrease of 29 new PM peak hour trip rates, as shown in Table 1. PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION Based on the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Model, the following trip distribution for the proposed project traffic was estimated: d 65% to and from the east (via Gulf to Bay Boulevard) 25% to and from the west (via Guff to Bay Boulevard) ® 5% to and from the north (via Duncan Avenue) 0 5% to and from the south (via Duncan Avenue) 1 LIPICKS & ASS®CIdTES, 11110. ~- t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 2 shows the distribution of the new PM peak hour project trip ends. Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of the PM peak hour project trip ends to the adjacent roadway network. ADJACENT ROADWAYS As stated previously, the site is located north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and west of Duncan Avenue. According to the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County and FDOT CIP, there are no capacity adding improvements budgeted in the vicinity of the project. BUILDOUT YEAR. It is anticipated that the project will have a 2~OS buiidout. STUDY AREA Based on our methodology meeting, the required study area includes Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from Lake Drive to Keene Road. In addition, all signalized intersections within the study area and all project driveways were analyzed, which include: e Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Lake Drive ~ Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Duncan Avenue L116VCIKS & ASS®CIATESa 6NC. 0 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t TABLE 2 NEW PM PEAK HOUR PROJECTTRIP DISTRIBUTI©N st 65% West f25%1 Narth 5% South 5% In Out In Opt I~r, Out In Out 5 6 2 2 1 1 1 1 ~.1N~lCS & BOSS®CIA'rES, 61i1C. Total In Out 9 1 {} 6 J ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ v _~ ~ . ~ ~ w Q ~a 4 ~ _ ~ ~ t ~ I 7<2> -3 ~ o w v s ~ .. _~ L ~, qq 000 ~ 4' .... O.~ V L 2 X60 ~ fl ~ 1 ~ r ~ :~ + - ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ 1 b ` • . - ~ • ~- o - ~ ~ o GULF TO BAY BLVD. ~~~ ~oo 33 =NEW PROJECT TRAFFIC <36> = PA55ERBY PROJECT TRAFFIC FlGU~ ~ PROJECT 1RAFFlC ~.~ea.cK~ ~ as~~c'~,~~s, oo~~. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Keene Road Q Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Project Accesses ® Duncan Avenue and Project Access BACKGROUND TRAFFIC The background traffic utilized in this analysis was calculated as follows: 1. Lincks ~ Associates, lnc. conducted PM peak hour (4 PM to 6 PM) turning movement counts at the following intersections within the skudy area: Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Lake Drive Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Duncan Avenue Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Keene Road 2. The counts were adjusted to peak season based on the FDOT adjustment factors for Pinellas County. 3. An annual growth rate of 2% was utilized to adjust the peak season traffic to the buildout year, 2009. Figure 3 illustrates the existing PM peak hour traffic, Figure 4 illustrates the peak season traffic, Figure 5 illustrates the 2009 background traffic and Figure 6 illustrates the 2009 background plus project traffic. ILINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC. ' 8 .rr. ~ as r~ r a~ ~ a rs a~ a~ ~ ter. r ~ .~. ~ CAD r ~ G 7C ~ ~ ~ p D a ~ ~ m y ~ ~. z: vi p a :S w'' a- V ~ ~ +- V ~ G v~ ~ o L 233 1439 1 ~ r- 116 ~ ~ ~ ~-- 1578 ~^ i-' 1449 r 82 `~ 1 ~' r 767 GULF TO __ . BAY BLVD. 51 1 1932 -- ~ ~ ~ 276 -~ +~ t ~- 1995 -+ 20 -z ~ u+ ~i 17 ~ w~'~ 1&73 --r l 131 -~ o° ro~ FlGURE 3 EXISTING TRAFFfC LINCKS $. ASSOCIATES, IPICa a~ ~ .~w. air .wf- ~ w~. a~ r. is a^~. ~. r^~r .wry ~. ..rs w ~, r. O m ~ m ~ ~ z ~ ~ r~i ~ z o mow L 21 maw t- 36 phmiv 'S<- 261 .~ 1 ~ °- 1612 r 130 ~ ~ ~ +-- 17fi7 ro ro ~- 1623 . _ . . .s- 92 .. '~ 1.. ~' . ~ 2ss GULF TO BAY. BLVD. _..._. s7 -s 2164 '!tl' a7~ '1Tf 31,E `lt(' -- w .~ rn 2234 --- 1874 -i 22 -z n~ w w 19 z m a d 147 ~ _ _ ~ -° ~ ~N ~D ~~Ill; T PEAK SEASON TRAFFIC L11~ICKS & ASSQCIAT~S, 11510. S r- ~ ~ rn rn ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ _ ~, a m' .p x -~ dN-P ti ~~ mN~ ~' 37 ~ N_ ~ t__. 271 d 1 b t- 1676 ~ 135 ~ 1 4 *- 1838 1A0 d 1 ~ a-- 16$$ . ~ 9s - ~- 31, GULF TO BAY BLVD. 59 -3 ~ ~ ~ 28 ~ r+ ~ T I 323 ~ ~ T 2251 ---~ 2323 -- N 1949 -°+ 23 -z wmm 20z nu vc 153 -a _ m mo , o a sC~1REJ 2b09 BACKGROUND TF2AF~lC ~,~N1CKS & ~SSOCIATESq fN~. ~~; ~~ ~~~ . ~ ~' ~ ~ ~: tip. .~ ,~~~ ~~ ~~- ~ ~,~. ~ ~~, ~~~ c° z rn v ~ z ~ a ~~ ~ ~ 1 C (1) 1 ~ t U ~ .~ O A N V w ® ~-. B W A ~ v N ~ A r, ~ n II 1 ~- 1676(1) 1 135 ! ~ ~ ~ (3)<1> t ~ ! ` '- 1837(3)<1> "`~ 4 r ) ( +- 1872(1) ~ 1872 - 96 ~ 59 -J ~ r ~ 28(2)<2> -s 2251(1) ~ 2321 ~ 23 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ cn a~+ 20 -a v.N~. w ND 13 = 2D09 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC (23) =NEW PROJECT TRAFFIC <36> = PASSERBY PR0.IECT TRAFFIC ~GUR~ 2009 BACKGROUN© PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC f*1 m z v ' z. o -a N (1~ "' N '~.. 271 ,. ~ ~ ~-- t 688(3) d 1 4 r 311 GULF TO BAY BLVD. 323(1) 1 ~ '~ 1949(4) -+ 153(1) ~ ~ N ~ L LINCIGS & ASSOCIATES, ~I~C. 1 i A 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 INTERSECTf4N ANALYSIS Capacity calculations were conducted far the PM peak hour at the following intersections: • Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Lake Drive • Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Duncan Avenue • Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Keene Road • Gulf to Bay Boulevard and project accesses • Duncan Avenue and project access These calculations were performed utilizing the methodology described in Chapters 16 and 17, Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections, respectively, of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Special Report, the 200Q Highway Capacity Manual. These calculations were pertormed bo#h with and without the proposed project. Tables 3 and 4 summarize the results of this analysis and the results are discussed in 1 1 r r t detail in the following paragraphs. Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Lake Drive Signalized intersection analysis indicates that this intersection operates at ~a Level of Service B with background traffic. With the addition of the project traffic, the intersection should continue to operate at a Level of Service B, as shown in Table 3. LL1~ICICS & A55®C~ATES, ANC. ~~ 1 TABLE 3 ESTIMATED If~TERSECTION LEVEL 01= SERVICE (SIGNALIZED .Intersection Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Lake Drive Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Duncan Avenue Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Keene Road ILiIWCKS 8. ASS~IAV~S, lhBCe 2009 2449 Background Background Plus Traffic Pro'ect Traffic Delay LOS DDe1ay LOS 17.8 B 17,7 B 15.0 B 15.1 B 153.1 F 153.8 F 14 TABLE 4 ESTIMATED INTERSECTION LEVEL ©F SERVICE {UNSIGNAL[ZED) PM Peak Hour Background Plus Project Traffic Intersection ~3irectiara Left Thr-~h R~ht Gulf to Bay Boulevard and SB _ _ B Project Driveway A WB Gulf to Bay Boulevard and SB - _ g Project Driveway B Duncan Avenue and Ei3 q _ A Project Driveway C NB A A _ SB - w *Free flow movement; therefore, the level of service was not calculate. LLPICKS & ~1SS000I~'~11~5, .i1+IC, 15 1 t Gulf to Ba Boulevard and Duncan Avenue Signalized intersection anaiysis indicates that this intersection operates at a Level of Service B with background traffic. With the addition of the project traffic, the intersection should continue to operate at a Level of Service B, as shown in Table 3. 1 1 1 1 Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Keene Road Signalized intersection analysis indicates that this intersection operates at a Level of Service F with background traffic. With the addition of the project traffic, the intersection should continue to operate at a Level of Service F, as shown in Table 3. Guy to Ba Boulevard and Pra'ect Drive A This project driveway is proposed to be unsignalized and have right in/right out access to Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Unsignalized intersection analysis indicates that all movements at this intersection should operate at an acceptable level of service with background plus project traffic, as shown in Table 4. Guff to Ba Boulevard and Pro'ect Drive B The project driveway is proposed to be unsignaled and have right out access to Guff to Bay Boulevard. Unsignafized intersection anaiysis indicates that all movements at this intersection should operate at an acceptable level of service with background plus project traffic, as shown in Table 4. LIIrIGXS & ~15SOC14TE5, IhIC. A /~ 1 V 1 ~I 1 r Duncan Avenue and Pro'ect Drive C This project driveway is proposed to be unsignalized and have full access tv Duncan Avenue. Unsignalized intersection analysis indicates that all movements at this intersection should operate at an acceptable level of service with background plus project traffic, as shown in Table 4. GENERALIZED LINK ANALYSIS A generalized link analysis was conducted for the following segments with background plus project traffic at buildout of the project. e Gulf to Bay Boulevard from Lake Drive to Keene Road As shown in Table 5, all segments should operate at an acceptable level of service during with the 2009 background plus project traffic, 1 ACCESS RECOMMENDATIC)NS The recommendations included in this report are based on a field review of the site, the proposed site plan and the Transportation Analysis. The. methodalogy utilized to determine the need for a righ# turn lane was based on the EDOT publications "Exclusive 1 Right Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections, When Should We Require Them'" The methodology utilized to determine the need for a left turn lane was based on the Highway Research Record (HRRj # 211-1967 "Volume Warrants for Left Turn Storage LltdCiCS & 455®CI®~'E5, 9EdC. A TABLE 5 GEbIERALIZED LINKANALYSIS 00 PAA Peak Hour Traffic Background New Background plus Traffic Project Traffic Proie_ct Traffic 4,zo4 4 4,2as 4,396 11 4,407 Available Capacifx f372 673 It.finiCKS & ASS~C1r4Ti~S, 91~C, Peak Hour Roadway From To Lar-es Capacity ('f ) Gulf to Bay Blvd. Lake Dr. Duncan Ave. 8LD 5,08U Duncan Ave. Keene Rd. 6LD 5,060 (1} Saurce~ 2007 FDOT Generalized Q/Level of Service Tables, 1 lJ 1 t 1 t Lanes at Unsignalized Grade Intersections." The length of the left and right turn lanes were determined based on the FDOT Standard Index 301. The access recommendations are summarized in Table 6 and described in the following paragraphs. Gulf to Bav Boulevard and Proiect Drive A This project driveway is proposed to have right inlright out access to Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Based on the estimated traffic, a westbound right turn lane is not warranted. Gulf to Bav Boulevard and Project Drive B The project driveway is proposed to have right out access to Guff to Bay Boulevard; therefore, no turn lane is necessary. Duncan Avenue and Pro'ect Drivewa C This project driveway is proposed to have full access to Duncan Avenue. Based on the estimated traffic, a northbound left turn lane is not warranted and a southbound right turn lane is not warranted. t CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of this study, the proposed project is a reduction in new PM peak hour trip ends from the existing use. The generalized link analysis shows the segment of Gulf to Bay Boulevard from Lake Drive to Keene Road operates at an acceptable v 1 1 level of service with 2009 background plus project traffic. The intersection analysis LINC~CS & dSS®Ci/iTES, INC. 1~ 1 1 y R 1 1 1 TABLE 6 ACCESS RECOMMENDATIONS intersection Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Project Driveway A Duncan Avenue and Project Driveway C Turn Lane Movement Volume 1 Warm WBR ~ No NBL 7 No SBR 1 No (1) See Figure 6, 21)09 Background Plus Project Traffic, of this report. 1 1 Llii+)J~KS 47l W-~~i/~~P69iG~1 ~~~~ 20 N shows all the intersections within the study area- should operate at an acceptable level of service with 2009 background plus project traffic, existing geometry and signal timings except Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Keene Road. This intersection is shown to operate at a Level of Service F with background and background plus project traffic: Since this project is a decrease in PM peak hour trip ends, no mitigation should be required. 21 -_ 1 1 APPENDIX I I 1 n 16tl0t7t1~~~ pL 6W e~a~7~yy~~~~s~o ~®8~9e 1 1 0 ~- ~_ TRAFFIC NrETHODOLOGY ~~~~~~ & ~~~~~0~~~~' ~~~o ~' ~' i i~iich~el Vats From: himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:14 PM To: myates@lincks.com Subpect: RE: Coionial Bank Traffic Study ~ In that case the methodology looks good as long as the study itself includes the items I mentioned earlier. I am looking at the turning movement counts and they show the peak hour ' to be from 16:00-17:45 which is more than an hour. Can you clarify this? Thanks, Himanshu ' -----Original Message----- From: Michael Yates [mailto:myates@lincks.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:47 PM To: Patni, Himanshu Subject: RE: Colonial Bank Traffic Study 1 It is missing those items because it is a methodology statement and not a transportation analysis. You required us to first submit a written methodology before we could conduct the analysis. Michael Yates Project Manager . Lincks & Associates, Inc. 5023 ~ Laurel Street Tampa, FL 33607 (83.3)289-0039 Phone {813)287-0674 Fax m ates lincks.com -----Original Message----- From: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com [mailto:Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:54 AM To: myates@lincks.com Cc: Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com Subject: Colonial Bank Traffic Study Michael, I have been reviewing the traffic study submitted for the Colonial Bank and it is missing the following: - LOS at the intersections and all driveways that were to analyzed. - LOS of the segment of SR-60 that was studied. - LOS data to include existing LOS, future LOS due to background traffic at 2% per year growth rate, future. LOS due to background traffic + proposed development for all intersections and the SR-60 segment. - CD containing the HCS+ files for the LOS analysis. These items shall be required before we can finish our review of the study. i I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Engineers Planners January 22, 2008 Mr. Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Public Works AdministrationlEngineering Municipal Services Building, Room #220 100 S. Myrtle Ave.. Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Re: Colonial Bank @ Gulf-ta-Bay Lincks Project No. L07168 Dear Mr. Elbo: 61~19~7149~~1 IX ~~¢i7®V=D1~~ l! ~e`d~g ~~~n The purpose of this letter is to establish the methodology to be utilized in the Transportation Concurrency Analysis for the proposed Colonial Bank located north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and west of Duncan Avenue in the Gity of Clearwater, Florida. The following outlines the methodology to be utilized in the analysis: Existing Development/Use The property has most recently been utilized as a Krispy Kreme. The property currently contains approximately 4,565.1 square feet of building area. The existing survey is included in the Appendix. Pro osed.Develo ment/Use The developer proposes to remodel the existing building to accommodate a 4,665.1 square foot Colonial Bank with drive through windows. The conceptual site plan is included in the Appendix. Access Points. The project is proposed to use the existing accesses to both Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Duncan Avenue. The access proposed for each roadway is as follows: 5023 West Laurel Street Tampa, Florida 33607 813 289 0039 7elsphpne 813 287 0674 Telefax www.lincks.com Website Mr. Bennett Elbo January 22,2008 Page 2 ® Guif-to-Bay Boulevard a. One right in/right out access b. One right out access e Duncan Avenue a. One full access Buildout Year The buildout year for the project is proposed to be 2009. Anal sis Period The analysis will be undertaken for the buildout year (2009). In addition, the analysis will be conducted for the weekday PM peak hour (4 PM to 6 PAA}. ~ Project Tria Generation The project trip generation far the existing Krispy Kreme was based on data contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 7#h Edition, 2003 and the trip generation for the proposed development was estimated based on local trip generation data for a bank. Table 1 provides the estimated PM peak hour trip ends for both the existing and proposed development. Based on the data shown in Table 1, this project will result in a decrease of the PM peak hour trip ends. Passerb Ca ture ' Passerby capture for the existin Kris o g py Kreme was estimated to be 5010 and the passerby capture for the proposed bank was estimated to be 26.9% based on the local data for a bank. Table 1 summarizes the new PfVI peak hour trip ends for the existing and proposed project. As shown in Table 1, proposed development would result in a decrease of 29 new PIS peak hour trip ends. Pro'ect Tri Distribution and Tri Assi nment The trip distribution and trip assignment of the proposed project traffic was determined utilizing the 2015 SE data (with project added) on the E + C network. The model plots are included in the Appendix of this report. 1 1 1 _ Mr. Benneft Elbo January 22, 2008 Page 3 Study Area Based on our methodology meeting, you have required the stud area includ - Y e Gulf-to Bay Boulevard from Lake Drive to Keene Road. In addition, you have required all 1 signalized intersections within the study area and all project driveways to be analyzed, which will include: ' ® Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Lake Drive ® Guff-to-Bay Boulevard and Duncan Avenue ® Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Keene Road ® Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Project Accesses ® Duncan Avenue and Project Access Scheduled/Planned Improvements All improvements contained in the first three years of the five year work programs for Pinellas County, the City of Clearwater and/or the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) will be included., Based on a preliminary review, there are no budgeted improvements within the study area for this project. Background Traffic The background traffic to be utilized in the analysis will be conducted as follows: 1. Lincks ~ Associates, inc. will conduct PI1~ peak hour (4 PM to 6 PM) turning movement counts at the intersections within the study area. 2. The counts will be adjusted to peak season based on the FDOT adjustment .. factors. 3. An annual growth rate of 2% will be utilized. 4. The growth rate will be applied to the existing peak season counts in number 2, above. Intersection Analysis The intersection analysis will be conducted using methodologies contained in the Highway Capacity 1i~anual and modeled using the latest Highway Capacity Software programs. e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 Mr. Bennett Elbo January 22, 200$ Page 4 Roadwa Anal sis Roadway link analysis will be conducted for Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard between Lake Drive and Keene Road. Turn Lane Analysis Turn lanes at each project access will be analyzed to determine if warranted using FDOT guidelines. If warranted, an evaluation of turn lane lengths will be conducted based upon FDOT guidelines. Report The analysis will be summarized in a report and submitted to City of Clearwater staff. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, LINCKS & AS O ES, IIVC. Cc: Terry Liby, P.E. TABLE 1 ESTIMATED NEW PM PEAK HOUR TRIP ENDS Trip PM Peak Hour Passerby IVew PM Peak Hour Rate 1 _ Trip Ends (1) _ Capture (2) Tri Ends Scenario Land Use Size In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Exis#ing Krispy Kreme 4,665.1 SF 20.011,000 SF 47 47 94 23 23 46 24 24 46 Proposed .Bank with Drive Through Window 4,665.1 SF 5.3811,000 SF 12 13 25 3 3 6 9 10 19 Difference <35> <34> <69> <15> <14> <29> (1) Trip generations #or the existing Krispy Kreme was based on ITE Trip Generation, Th Edition and trip generation for the proposed Colonial Bank was based on studies conducted by Lincks & Associates, Inc. at banks in the Tampa Bay area. (2) It is estimated that 50% of the Krispy Kreme's trip ends are passerby and 26.9% of the bank trip ends are passerby. ® Krispy Kreme 94 x 0.50 = 47 Use 46 Bank 25x0.269=6 The passerby trip ends should not exceed 10% of adjacent street traffic. 1,446(a) x 0.10 = 145 > 6 (a) Based on the turning movement count conducted at the intersection of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Duncan Avenue. fL~~~~~ & ~~~®l~il~`t~l~~g ~~~o 1 1 1 1 1 EKISTIIVG SURVEY t 1 A r 1 1 F~Fltl@slviAl~ IX @~~~7®4o G6K1 ~I ~~g ~tl®tFSe ~ GOL®I \9A~ B/1171\ ®m- - da4 Cammerclel Caurl, 9ufle E p~ ar.~ ~ vr•vm~ ua w- Venleo, FL. 3d2B2 o,onlwv xv.: Jw° Op J fXCO m...n ' 7689 GULF T~ BAY BLV® ~ "'"' o~ o t 5 PhOne:E907)412.3712 ~IS~~ ~'4N~f710NS ~ rxx r 1 r/bD FWrlde CenlUcelo of rroAa ru snrcr w. rr~ n 1~ p 1~ Ana n e~ 1e 1~ 1e 1b 1I M, p ENGEE9+9ILUSIEISSURVFYpIf u~¢ ¢n[ rlee If. IG R 0S ! YO L IL y9 B 1~ ~. ®U7'Y UN dq ~~~EC~ AuIhOrIx000n ND.1772 ary 200~QO' Z pF 11i f! ^Re~ ~!Y +o• r0• o• /0' +o• ~~!) j ~_Ir el JaWr 1' ~ /D' 11 i $. DNM1r~arl Al venue I I ,~ ~I,~: +~_T . ~~~.~¢.~ ~~~~ rl i /~L~ ^__r-- E~e~~ `' ~ ~' L ~y cpr. '° ~~ ~ J .,. ¢a f I I 1 I I r Section 14, Township 29 South, Rcenge 15 East Pinetdas Co'ttnty, Ftoy~+.da. 1 ~I i ~~~ 11~ aIIE~ I 1 I Ad'9CR1Pf'MN A P.ewl l bred m fhr JwNrw1 I ~ eJ rnr soi.lhm..l r/. ,~rn. NsrlA.n.l r/e rf s.vHn. ra. rm...,nep ar Jevyt %.,yr rd rwe P+nrllae carte Trv.lda e.wy M+M. .er+s:d w Jemm~: - JIar1 ¢1 !M asulMaN eemH a/ IM JeulMwf I/a ~ Ne J>Whvn1 f/i eJ IM Xmihrwl I% vl Jraff.n re, Taimrhlp rP JaYN, R f6 wl rmA Pr N.OI'l l'df J.. 60.0! l 1 IM f0 mrr Irw; fArrrer ds X.eB1T0S-., 6J.J1 JJ~~1IV IM 7dM eJ Inhrnvllon OIM rn! rlpM-e ~voY 14.. eJ D¢nevn Avrnur rnd IM NeAh rtphl-aJ- Ilnr rJ N1J to B¢y 9sutrv¢tC /v~ POIXT 01 BdCI NtNC: fJNner v N~ICIi•oC I., /4d.00 Jrrr Vmp IM N~h rf¢M-U-mvl! tW aJ Cu(I 1¢ 6¢y Hevfwmµ nNmr Pv N.OOLL'LSII„ LOO.OD J. r~ IMner rs J.BB TOdd.. IfB.00 ~r1 !e ¢ pdN m W Pul rlpAl-rJ-wvy Ilnr eJ Dunrvn Avmw o. eMum (M plat d IM proprrfy aJ I r X Gbdt free. e. nemdrd In Plv! gest d6. P¢p.a Br mr6 r1 el W grR11e Xrrpnlr aJ M11N [w Nµ IrwWa• IMricr ii s.onat•rT C. ar0.oo J.y elmp IeW [rU ripne-e}-wuy H.v eJ yunrm. Avmw Is Yfr POINI e- %%e1NNINA Dengw•~ Avero n1Y rMw War +..r.. aw.l w vrde..r V HHX we.nr. w'UnHrnre ewn d r.rnva... n r.r...ewrlwe..w.vru •ye..enww a.....ee.n I.•rvrary u wmrora .vu.-V.~r wrw. rw.. w•.•r.er•4. e.e....ruea n wn .vnv~ .ru.. W M/.'I•r.ed >nrrlWhnr >errrr'rrrn4 v mrrNx.h Ar brw erwrd rwwl Pen INen Axrx. hrrr6M u dry¢IM Rmwe Y Mw rwplW b w Men*b.r1 M w rneni N. e..H~,wr d r..rr¢ .Urnwa !. riu•-a--r -w~ ..,,.r+•- ....,~-•..+.. n w r.wrwrw e...¢ .. +,.... 01Y4V1 w Irre/ w RrwA arrd X.Ir >a+iTPr>. lrr ur ae¢bnr NuM~y / ru~Hrl r^M`II r¢ a an+vw n, neenw.fp !I arvN AW !r arK M¢er MdH Nrr4 1vY r1.Mrre: ArH~.ar OMtllr My Apa rY1 ¢I1wl arrawwe Arro FO ,IAp ahrwn )r.If. Mer+ aaJ X I~.n lW. Ra w Wrrnrlpee U llrH Fwf !v r lTwW~eu~~mr¢ aaenu4 HYIn b W. wrtl .nwm Ar 1.U awA U ne~.r..iV ¢eU rr vw anuw~rl er.r J.n wa Y w .wrwln../ rmuyr•n Anwirrn a rr y e,,.r.rr ..ee....,r wrr Nry q rww+rw~ru~.H.... w.. wr.e, ... ru au Ml M T«u er.n... hl mu. w...ww.a. ~.n I e.at j a.w~...r a~'wrr p wy~ ~.n n¢ wrnre liir ri a~ j. '! w 1Mrn•w mwre Anm rw U r.rrn...r Vn.`...mr rwrxnn (a.Ai.J. WuVV ¢w'..u¢~'j) a ~~ atlW vin ~ r'd'~i..mwi. en v r~ rr b .T,~r .u.:' qw.. w~ r^rW. r~ o~ry wR s ..~x... " .r-w •.... !.f+rr w .vw w. w .wrr r-q .. r+~ a r+Aw.r. .+rewr o•.rr., ....... U wn.v r.r.>.e+.y. d a ~ Jk~ ~n..rv r,.Ee rwrwy rrcrxiua sraxa.ero ros urp aunamu r•.wwr H n.pr„ run-e.vea a r.ra a~yerµina: wy H'>r.I:.,y ~ r.~ia wXn'~.Kir,,, ~r' ~"~~ r rxn[. r.~...rv P...r ~,... norm errr t Arn¢IYnA mlrlerlrwr w ~ arnN aPMmrN rwdH .. 1111rM Xerre4 aw eah WI. n d w Wbu Arwep V Rrw¢u Mr¢¢ Mua V.we ra/wT"~ N b r•Tlr•~N` 4•sr•rr..sr.rr.. v....l nM~rr e.r[.v wrrmvr v m.rvw w eNYrV n..w 1.r wr, nr. rrn .J w raw wrr.a rf Merr rre.w Vnru rahei rrw^r w u r•T'AeVb drrrer•r her.n. '.>M~ w..~,. ~.u d r•a~.•ry .,,rn.i'2:'.'.'.'.¢wrr ¢w rwra ry. rv. a w waw .rr..w a rur~r. w,rn rl.ru. rre v.~rr ryr.ra a m¢rr u gXeln A.rrr4 rw NrH. lbr. nrr. rAlela ..y... rr.Y•r¢ mr wn prmw rr LBBdND ~.""uml m apibur.~ ~ wA° i u. i °w° drrrby ' n v m . e.e w r...Ye dru~4 ld m ~ .d C rv nm rr.Wl Ornrral ~ r ~ y ~ p u O Mr T eY4u rpdp.ei Der 6'Idr rwr - 10,10 Jrrt ~u Aer rard - N/A Hd AS A nhl / ¢nrw... Trw '0~' , r * M~ % Nlh a Aa m ilsy ..~,~ une.r. la .r l e.dd 1 py. r Hyl [siarrae Al-fa-arrr r O 0. W ~+•'~ M1err ~Wr rueLl 1rA IWel6e1 ifprY Asprr/r In. 4 r Hr..... Arrnrs ,vwr ~ P XuWwp s.w.. L •rl prepnfy enMnr: aarre.d r,u¢n J..1 B y.e.n. v,e~,r e.. I.ra A.... ~@ Tdr Ww.m~! P•1 ea n~•• psun Wr - r'"' TM' ~Y ~. 1 ~ ¢u r Glerrn Price - Sufreyireg . w..emw h Mnppfnd, Ine•. I.avrn.., rwnr~-prn., n.m no a. ciy. w~u..leJu ~ nrr. nr i nl-0nl a r,. uennl.wn rAxAmiAD cla i t 1 CO~#CEPTUAL SITE PLAfV 1 i 1 1 1 w I _ I I E~E~I I --~`~'ti• ~: I_~~°~:~ ~~ I ~ ~~I~~o~ ~~nanoNs E;• / oosnrro eeoo r-7o' PROPO$[~ P[V[llEni PAP. P o PnOPOSE9 cancnaE CERT. C[6r1NG r't[i z"= Rmrnwc so. souw[ Fl. ICEI WE. uwwV WNrCICLO VNtrSawE MGE N[OCC ~lN.~n [ - - - ~• oEUOrts PRaPrmr UNE Poor naww xPrmuEm or rnwsPOmnriw PROPOSC~ C Nn9 Oj OrliOtE M1N8CR PMNPiQ SPItp C} W101ES [IIIir1C R01r 1} EIn511N0 WM POIE ~~" ~ST~ ®~lPtaLOPME[EdY ~44~ I. tM~ 1 PARit1N0 DpTAI ~.~I (9AAAl8 FlNAACIAL EETAtUlRIAERIlt iI COLOtULL SAAt tUR01N8 gfA a q,gg;,1 BF - ~je NEQ911REO14,Bggl QygtPACEBIl0B0 gF gFUv ig EPACEg E1 t9g1YE~iHUU GttEge7B YEHICLEt tfgCtODB ,}y l AUfOMARC iELLEU (gltlimlBPACE/RgACNINE I'•~e ~ ~1i~ PROYIDSDIlI JPADEg 11ACL00fDBlltdeP ACCElllgll lPACESI PROVIDED BTACION01 gDAlf[-TRAU I11UEte1g Tf01CLEt tTAC011U ! gPABEgfA7N '~k1 I BITE STpTfST1ODe I~~~ LOOATIONI 18999ULF 10 tAi /ETO CLFAtNAIEA , fLOBRIA El7tt $aR PAACEI ID Mot 1q-l1-IU-gB000.1E0•DS00 f ZONINOt CORNEDCNL ~~ ~f FLOOD PONS: 'C' P.LR.M CONEUURI PAl1Ei Ue 1!011! O1Bl0, ti ~ ~::Q DEYRED AUDUt-0t, 108E . EEEyTTT llllll111111 FP ELSV.E D9A/' @ ~~ E1tISTINO ORUBLpPPABNT AREAS PROPOSED OSVBLOPIIIDNT 6!1646 II oeveloPh~En 4nEAt EIQRI x DBTtLOPNtNT AREAL a11lEE x a[am~nw uE +aa r, tmawawr ,~ LP~irunwa.w.e.wu at r~o.w.w..e.wr } ocaawaEnu [n o , [wn~wE~Rr mrustc emawN.sPiaE ~.rmrnewrr.„no.[a.swFrawwru e.n I ELRWOYIOXM®NVA Pb aw01wO P~ViLfM fpplltlt9MMr tO rtuwl Lw vm rENEOIUW a,PgWWERtnna IF_ rtOlOftnENHNKil1UJNt+K'MPJ .III y~,am mem,e aon*monewcaEnron walmlEE E. wnPm an mexraxuw II I 90111RN:1[R FIWII 709p0YDfC18 M AI/9P [RRmMi0r~69 AIO I Oq_91AVCIM.i1 716,PI01~fa_gYl IqT IYIFtI ID ErE71Pp itbiN+ 80010!610! SUIL.VDL/fl` 101.. - ccmmugaltom u1ErtaE PoEE ro ha~1~ ~-ijm 06 EIIMloq mAn 0rq[ tmP AR4aHC L71AA(HI AS p1f' I I/P1 pnp~ ®~®~~ U/"tl~~ mO0 "° p7 40g Commoldel Court, EUllaE Eua,'a~~'. P,_ ® "° ° '"` wuma "~ m_ ~+ Yenlm, FL B42E2 iw.cE°s m i ie r 700! SITE p ~/E~ X698 TQ ~~eY V~tlB.B ~ 7 "A H MON S Pi1on0:1t4 11 4 12-37 12 ~~~~'~~ ~~~~ ~S ®~ 1 U i~+0 PLAN ' 1 OLE TE FloddO CenlOmle al V r,wcer le. ~~ rExaa Innoe oErc ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ®~ 8 ®~ : ,~, amm0~nuxom~amRmo umsnrE wnuEe AlAhortEABOn N0.1772 aErr, 2007001 5 a 9 1 1 KRISPY ~RENiE TRIP GENERATI®N ~I~d~i f6v lhl~ « S~v~a7~NY~uEt~9 Fl i~o~g II13~i~a Summary of Trip Generation Calculation For 4.6651 Th.Gr.Sq.Ft. of Donut and Ice Cream Shop January 22, 2008 r 1 1 1 1 Average Rate Standard Deviation Adjustment Factor Driveway Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 0.00 0.00 1.00 p 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 10.00 0.00 1.00 47 4-5 PM Peak Hour Exit 10.00 0.00 1.00 47 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 20.00 0.00 1.00 93 Saturday 2-Way Volume 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Saturday Peak Hour Enter 0.00 0.00 1.00 p Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Saturday Peak Hour fiotal 0.00 D.00 1.00 0 Note:. A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 7th Edition, 2003. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS 1 1 1 BANK TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS L~~~~~ ~ ~~~®~B~°~~~9 f~~~e ^ TABLE 1-A PM PEAK HOUR TRIP CHARACTERISTICS (1) BANK WITH DRIVE THROUGH Location Avera e Tri Rate % Passerb Tri s Bank of Tampa -Waters Avenue ~ 6.57 12.5% Bank of Tampa - Oakfield Drive 4.51 21.7% First Citrus Bank -Sheldon Road 5.05 45.5°/Q Average 5.38 26.9% (1) Based on trip characteristics studies conducted by Lincks & Associates, inc. in the Tampa Bay area. i~o~~i~s & ~alS~®Wgt16t1 tY ~~y flil~lbe i~ 1 1 1 1 PROJECT TRAI=FIC DISTRIBUTION 1 r t 9®gfl~@mtl®~ IX ~Ta~®KV~~~~O~g Fl9~l c6so 0.01 o.oi o.01 O p d' A Q W '. ------___ O p O ~ p 0 o y I~ -~1... ..._ .... r J 0 0 _. .. 0 ~ ~ -- -- - - ._ _ __ a _.._ --- - _ _ _ ... .. --- 0 11~ ' ° v o 0 0,0 0 0 O '_ A O I ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0.01 0 0 O ~ ~~O O O ~I p O O O G _O. Q p - ~ !i o -_ c_ . _ .. i. ~_.._ __- --- ---- ~i , f ~~~ 0 O O O O w O.i ~~ O<: n ~. 0.1 0.12 0.33 '~- 0 0.12 0.12 0.16 0; 0.38 0 ° c°n 0 ~ 0 G _ _..~--[._. _..__ _-.. _...___-___ . .q __ .. ... _ . ~.._ ... O _ ~ ._ ` ~''• i ' ' .. G O O O O ~ C ,! f 'll 0 0 0 }1 0.01 0 0 O O ' Q%p G ;i ~ j 0 _ .._-- ~ `- -- a o __ .._ .. - -__ -- 0 ~ ri ~ .. O O C O o ~ 0.02 0.04 O,~ ~' 0.19 o fl 0.19 ~ if'") CD ~ ~ G ._ - .. __ ... _ 0 0 -O - _. _,_ r p O O i Q 0.01 o.oa -- O O v C~ o c n 0.01 Pro~jelct Traffic Distribution T ~~ ~ _ c~a'J~o I..IC2~352u LG ~ ~f~CKS & .k550C12L2S, I.i?C. ~r ~~ 1 TRAFFIC COUNTS €~Q~ld'~~SS & ~S~~C9~~~~9 @R9Co ~_ L[NCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC. GULF-TO-BAY BLVD AT LAKE ST COLONIAL BANK GULF-TO-BAY DECEMBER 12, 2007 File Name :Gulf-to-Bay&Lake-prn Site Code :00007168 Star# Date ; 12/11/2007 Page No : 1 --- - S LAKE DR ce va~o GULF TO BAY BLVD -IICpY VtlIRGItl5-U-1 UrrIS SLAKE DR ~ GULF TO BAY BLVD Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Factor Left 1.0 Thru 1.0 Right ROR 1.0 1.0 Total Left 1 0 Thru 0 1 Right ROR 1 0 1 0 _ Total Left Thru Right ROR App' _Total t_eft Thru Right ROR App• Total _ Int. Total 16 00 2 . __ . . . 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 0 LO : 16:15 3 12 12 2 5 2. 3 18 23 24 30 355 32 2 0 381 11 12 3 2 28 16 396 . 5 1 418 845 16:30 4 8 1 2 15 30 9 343 3 0 6 1 362 380 9 7 23 6 1 39 8 435 3 1 447 871 16:45 4 8 _ 0 2 14 26 324 0 0 350 9 8 18 10 11 13 3 38 11 424 5 1 441 874 Total 13 40 8 9 70 110 1351 _ 11 1 1473 36 61 30 19 41 146 11 439 4 1 455 860 46 1694 17 4 1761 3450 17:00 2 7 0 2 17:15 2 12 2 0 17:30 4 9 0 1 17:45 3 16 2 0 Total 11 44 4 3 Grand Total 24 84 12 12 Apprch % 18.2 63.6 9.1 9.1 Total % 0.3 1.2 0.2 0.2 11 27 359 7 1 394 6 17 13 4 16 37 392 7 0 436 6 14 6 6 14 26 364 4 0 394 8 16 10 3 21 22 344 2 0 368 13 17 6 5 62 112 1459 20 1 1592 33 64 35 18 1321 222 2810 31 2 3065 69 125 65 37 7.2 91.7 1.0 0.1 23.3 42.2 22.0 12.5 1.8 3.1 39.1 0.4 0.0 42.6 1.0 1.7 0.9 0.5 40 16 561 5 0 582 1027 32 13 487 2 0 502 986 37 11 445 7 1 464 909 41 12 377 2 1 392 822 150 52 1870 16 2 194D 3744 2961 98 3564 33 6 3701 7194 2.6 96.3 0.9 0.2 4.1 1.4 49.5 0.5 0.1 51.4 S LAKE DR GULF TO BAY BLVD Southbound SLAKE DR GULF TO BAY BLVD _ Westbound - Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right ROR Total Left Thru Right ROR Total Left Thru Right ROR App' ___ _ Left Thru Right ROR App• ___ Int. l Peak Hour From 16:00 tv 17:45 -Peak 1 of 1 Total Total Tota lntersectian 16:45 Volume 12 36 2 5 55 Percent 21.8 65.5 3.6 9.1 17:00 Volume 2 7 D 2 11 Peak Factor High Int. 17:15 Volume 2 12 2 0 16 Peak Factor 0.859 116 1439 18 1 1574 7.4 91.4 1.1 0.1 27 359 7 1 394 17:15 37 392 7 0 436 0.903 i 29 65 40 16 15D 19.3 43.3 26.7 10.7 6 17 13 4 40 16:45 9 18 11 3 41 0.915 i 51 1932 18 2 2003 2.5 96.5 0.9 0.1 16 561 5 0 582 17:ao 16 561 5 0 582 0.860 3782 1027 0.921 ~ ~ ~ r ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, ING. GULF-TO-BAY BLVD AT DUNCAN ST COLONIAL BANK GULF-TO-BAY DECEMBER 12, 2007 f!. ~ o...a..d n.. , r_.. File Name : GLtlf to-Bay&Duncan-pm Site Code :00007168 Start Date :12/6/2007 Pagt? Na : 1 DUNCAN 5T GULF TO BAY BLVD DUNCAN ST ~ GULF TO BAY BLVD Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Factor Left 1.0 Thru Right ROR 0 1 1 0 .1 0 Total Left 1 0 Thru Right ROR 1 0 1 A 'total Left Thru Right ROR App' Total Left _ Thru Right ROR App• Total _ Int. Total . . , . . 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 0 1 0 16:00 16:15 3 8 6 0 5 1 1 10 29 413 2 0 444 7 9 1 6 23 6 465 . . 5 0 476 953 16:30 11 6 0 2 0 16 17 22 19 387 3 1 413 7 2 413 4 6 2 5 17 4 437 1 0 442 888 ~_ 16:45 9 5 1 0 15 26 353 11 2 441 392 2 9 5 5 6 6 4 3 16 2 8 472 4 0 484 958 Total 31 22 2 3 58 96 1566 23 5 1690 22 26 14 18 4 80 5 ~ 23 465 1839 3 0 13 0 473 1875 904 3703 17:00 7 4 1 3 17:15 6 6 2 0 17:30 4 11 1 0 17:45 8 4 0 1 Total 25 25 4 4 Grand Total 56 47 6 7 Apprch % 48:3 40.5 5.2 6.0 Total % 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.1 15 21 413 2 2 438 10 2 6 6 14 16 399 6 0 421 2 8 4 3 16 29 372 8 0 409 1 7 6 5 13' 20 403 3 2 428 5 6 2 1 58 86 1587 19 4 1696 18 23 18 15 116 182 3153 42 9 3386 40 49 32 33 1 5.4 93.1 i .2 0.3 1 26.0 31.8 20.8 21.4 1.5 2.4 42.0 0.8 0.1 45.1 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.4 24 6 568 2 1 577 1054 17 5 490 7 0 502 954 19 5 458 3 0 466 910 14 3 422 0 D 425 8$0 74 19 1938 12 1 1970 3798 154 42 3777 25 1 384 7501 1.1 98.2 0.7 0.0 5 2.1 0.6 50.4 0.3 0.0 51,3 DUNCAN ST GULF TO BAY BLVD ~ DUNCAN ST GULF TO BAY BLVD Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right ROR TOfe~ Left Thru Right ROR App' Total Left Thru Right ROR App' Left Thru Right ROR App. fnt. Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45 - Faak 1 of ~ Total Total Total Intersection 16:30 Volume 33 21 4 3 61 Percent 54.1 34.4 6.6 4.9 17:00 Volume 7 4 1 3 15 Peak Factor High Int. 16:30 Volume 11 6 0 D 17 Peak Factor 0.897 82 1578 26 6 1692 4.8 93.3 1.5 0.4 21 413 2 2 438 16:30 19 413 7 2 441 0.959 23 21 21 16 81 28.4 25.9 25.9 19.8 10 2 6 6 24 16:45 9 6 6 3 24 0.844 24 1995 16 1 2036 1.2 98.0 0.8 0.0 6 568 2 1 577 17:00 6 568 2 1 577 0.882 3870 1054 0.918 i ~ ~ I~ r I~ ~ ~ ~ I• ~ I~ w• ~ I~ ~w Ilr I~ LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC. GULF-TO-BAY BLVD AT KEENE RD COLONIAL BANK GULF-TO-BAY DECEMBER 12, 2007 File Name : Gulf~to-Bay&Keene-pm Site Code :000071 fib Stan Da#e :'12/1112007 Page No : 1 KEENE RD Southbound GULF TO BAY BLVD Westbound KEENE RD Northbound GULF TO BAY BLVD E tb Start Time Left Thru Right ROR App' Total Left Thru Right ROR App' T t l _ Left Thru Right ROR App' Left Thru as oun Ri ht g d ROR p`pp• tnt. Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 v a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 A Total 1.0 1.0 1 0 1 0 Total Total 16:00 37 175 45 0 257 76 323 45 10 454 28 218 66 1 313 59 323- . 18 . 3 403 - 1427 16:15 39 167 41 1 248 46 353 50 6 455 47 259 47 0 353 58 429 16 0 503 1559 16:30 38 189 50 0 277 76 318 46 7 447 28 206 71 0 305 84 370 27 6 487 1516 16:45 37 190 62 0 289 64 315 3$ 7 424 36 226 68 0 330 75 407 26 4 512 1555 Total 151 721 198 1 1071 262 1309 179 30 1780 139 909 252 1 1301 276 1529 _ 87 13 1905 6057 17:00 40 206 45 0 29'I 70 358 52 4 484 46 260 59 0 365 75 453 28 11 567 1707 17:15 39 192 51 0 282 65 357 48 1 471 38 290 62 D 390 77 489 14 20 600 1743 17:30 47 175 51 2 275 6D 365 60 3 488 36 262 66 0 364 64 349 23 9 445 1572 _ 17:45 54 161 65 1 281 72 369 55 10 506 40 208 62 0 310 62 382 22 4 470 1567 Total 180 734 212 3 1129 267 1449 215 18 1949 160 1020 249 0 1429 278 1673 87 44 2082 6589 Grand Total 331 1455 410 4 2200 529 2758 394 48 3729 299' 1929 501 1 2730 554 3202 174 57 3987 12646 Apprch % 15.0 66.1 18.6 0.2 I 14.2 74.0 10.6 1.3 ~ 11.0 70.7 18.4 0.0 13.9 80.3 4.4 1.4 Total °f° 2.6 11.5 3.2 0.0 17.4 4.2 21.8 3.1 0.4 29.5 2.4 15.3 4.0 0.0 21.6 ~ 4.4 25.3 1.4 0,5 31.5 KEENE RD GULF TO BAY BLVD KEENE RD GULF TO BAY BLVD Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right ROR App' Total Left Thru Right. ROR App' Tot l Left Thru Right ROR App' Left Thru Right ROR App• Int. Ppak Hnur'Frnm if;•nrl f n 17•d~ _ Pn~4 i of 1 a Total Total _ Total intersection 17:00 Volume 180 734 212 3 1129 Percent 15.9 65.0 18.8 0.3 17:15 Volume 39 192 51 0 282 Peak Factor High Int. 17:00 Volume 40 206 45 0 2.91 Peak Factor 0.970 267 1449 215 18 1949 13.7 74.3 11.0 0.9 65 357 48 1 471 17:45 72 369 55 10 506 0.963 i60 1020 249 0 1429 11.2 71.4 17.4 0.0 38 290 62 0 390 17:15 38 290 62 0 390 0.916 278 1673 87 44 2082 13.4 80.4 4.2 2.1 77 489 14 20 600 17:15 77 489 14 20 600 0.868 6589 1743 0.945 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FDOT SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS i 1 1 II 1 f~ 1 ?(~~]~ Peak Season Facto_* Category Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 1500 PINELLAE COONTYWIDE MOGF: 0.99 Week Dates SF PSCF 1 D1/ol/coos - .01/07/2006 1.D6 l.lz -- 2 O1/DB/2006 - 01/19/2006 1.D3 1.09 3 01/15/2006 - 01/21/2006 1.00 1.05 9 O1/22/2D06 - 01/28/2006 0.99 1.05 5 O1/29/20D6 - 02/04/206fi 0.98 1.D4 * 6 D2/O5/2006 - 02/11/2006 0.97 1.03 * 7 02/12/.2006 - 02/1$/2006 0.96 1.02 * B 02/19/2006 - 02/25/2006 0.95 1.01 * 9 02/26/2006 - 03/04/2006 0.94 1.D6 *10 03/05/2006 - 03/11/200b 0.93 0.98 *11 03/12/2006 - 03/18/2006 0.92 0,97 *12 03/19/2006 - 03/25/2006 D.92 0,97 *13 03/26/20D6 - 04/01/2006 0.93 0.98 *14 04/02/2006 - 09/08/2D06 0.94 1.00 *15 04/09/2D06 - D4/15/200b 0.99 1.00 *16 04/16/2006 - 04/22/2006 0.95 1.01 *17 04/23/2006 - 04/29/2006 0.9fi 1.02 *18 04/30/2006 - 05/06/2006 0.97 1.03 19 05/07/2006 -- 05/13/2006 0.98 I.09 20 05/14/2006 - 05/20/2006 0.99 1.05 21 05/21./2006 - 05/27/2006 1.00 1.06 22 05/28/2006 - 06/03/2006 1.00 1.06 23 06/04/20D6 - 06/10/2006 1.00 1.06 24 06/11%2D06 - 06/17/2006 1.01 1.07 25 06/18/2006 - 66/24/2006 l.pl 1.07 26 06/25/2006 - 07/D1/2006 1.01 1.07 27 07/02/200fi - 07/08/2006 1.01 1.07 28 07/09/20D6 - D7/i5/20p6 1.02 1.08 29 07/16/2006 - 07/22/2006 1.02 1.D8 3D 07/23/2006 - 07/29/200b 1,02 1.08 31 07/30/2006 - 08/05/2006 1.02 1.08 32 OB/06/20D6 - 08/12/2006 1.02 1.08 33 08/13/2006 - 08/19/2006 1.02 1.06 39 08/20/2006 - 08/26/2006 1.03 1.09 35 08/27/2006 - 09/02/2006 1,03 1.09 36 09/03/2006 - D9/09/2006 1.04 1.10 37 09/10/2D06 - 09/16/20p6 1.04 1.10 38 09./17/2006 - 09/23/2006 1.04 1.1Q 39 p9/24/2D06 - 09/30/2006 1.03 1.09 40 10/01/2006 - 1D/D7/2006 1.03 1.09 91 1D/08/2066 - 10!14!2006 1.D3 1.09 92 10/15/2006 - 10/21/20D6 1.02 1.08 43 10/22/2006 - 10/28/2006 1.04 1.10 9a 10/29/20D6 - 11/04/20D6 1.05 1.11. 95 11/05/200b - 11/11/2005 1.06 1,12 46 11/12/2006 - 11/18/2006 1.08 1.19 47 11/19/2006 - 11/25/2006 1.07 1.13 48 11/26/2006 - 12/02/2006 1.07 1.13 99 12/03/2006 - 12/09/20D6 1.06 1.12 50 12/1D/2006 - 12/16/2006 1.Ob 1.12 51 12/17/2006 - 12/23/2066 1.09 1.10 52 12%24/2006 - 12/30/2006 1.02 1.D8 53 12/31/2006 - 12/31/2p06 1.OD 1.06 * Peak Season Page 1 of 2 1~ i 1 i 1 iJ 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXfSTiNG SIGiUAL TIMIRIGS ~ -- _ _ _ - _ -- --- ~ ~-~ `~-. mil- - ~ ,_~~ ~ ._ ~~~l~E~ f --- _ ~ ` "ti r' 1 "1 r _ -- . __. ~3' C .. . . _ -- - __._ . ~' -_ ' -__ __ --- -_- -'- __ ~o - - ~~- _ _ ---- ~~_.__. '- ~-- -!v ---- -~-~-- --~~ --~~-- ------~ i 3 ---- ~ ----- ` - --- ~ - - - -- --- - ------ v~_ _-- - ___ : as --- - --~~~ ------- ,- - - 1 ~ -___ ~ ~ 2i --- -- -- ------- -- -- --" 1 _ ----- _ _ ---- - -- - r ~ -- - ---- - ------ - - __-- - _ _ -- -- ^ ~, ~I a~1 ~`S~. ~~~ ~ ~ - ~_' - 1 ~ - - _ -~s I5 qa w r ~~ ~ r ' -~ (~ /~ ,2 ~ CaL4l.~~f ~~t~1~' ~~ '- -_ - - 1 ~~ ' 1 1~ ~ .._ . _.._.._ _._ ...----. _ ., ~-~-L- -- - ~ - -- - - -----_ _.~ J ._.__ . s-..._-- __ ~ _ ~ ~ -. ~ -- _ --_-.__~_-- ----- __ __.. ~~ ~ ~ - - - - - ~._- 1 ~--.._---- ~ ! -_______ _ 2C~ ~.~.~. ~ --- -- - - ~ !-- ~_- ~ a3 .____--_ ~~' -----..._ 2q ------- _~~~_~~_~_.__------ -- Z ~ __ __ ~ 5~ -- ~ - 19 ----35 ~3 ~ ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ___- - ~_~ _ . _ r ~ ~ ~ - ~ - _ ~ ~~J ~~ - ~` ~~ - ~ ~- ~ _ _ _ -- _ ~ -- 1 HCS ANALYSIS PRINTOUTS 1 t 1 1 1 HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.21 Analyst: MRY Inter.: Gulf to Bay and Lake Dr Agency: Lincks & Associates, Inc. Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/13/2008 Jurisd: City of Clearwater Period: PM Peak Hour' Year 2009 Project ID: Background Traffic E/W St: Gulf to Bay Blvd N/S St: Lake Dr SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I f No. Lanes I 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR Volume 159 2251 23 1135 1676 22 133 76 66 114 42 8 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12..0 X12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 2 I 1 1 16 I 5 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations __ Phase Combination .l 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds ~ Peds WB Left A A A I SB Left A Thru A A I Thru A Right A A 1 Right A Peds ~ Peds NB Right ~ EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 5.0 5.0 76.0 15.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 125.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity {s} v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 191 1805 0.34 0.65 9.3 TR 3142 5168 0.79 0.61 19.8 Westbound L 292 1805 0.50 0.78 32.2 TR 3596 5166 0.51 0.70 9.1 Northbound L 165 1378 0.22 0.12 50.4 TR 215 1788 0.64 0.12 58.6 Southbound L 121 1012 0.12 0.12 49..6 TR 226 1883 0.22 0.12 50..2 Interse ction Delay = 17.6 {sec/veh) A B 19.5 B C A 10.8 B D E 56.9 E D D 50.0 D Intersection L05 = B secs 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.21 Analyst: MRY Inter.: Gulf to Bay and Lake Dr Agency: Lincks & Associates, Inc. Area Type: All o ther areas Date: 3/13/2008 Jurisd: City of Clearwater Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2009 Project ID: Background + Project Traffic E/W St: Gulf to Bay Blvd N1S St: Lake Dr SIGNALIZ ED INTE RSECTION SUMMARY _____ 1 ,Eastbound ! Wes tbound 1 Northbound J Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No . Lane I s I 1 3 0 I I 1 3 0 I 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 LGGonfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR Volume 159 2252 23 1136 1677 22 133 76 67 114 42 8 Lane Wid th 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 2 I 1 I 16 { 5 Duration 0.25 Area Type: Ali other areas Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 $ EB Left A A I NB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A I Right A Peds ~ 1 Peds WB Left A A A 1 SB Left A Thru A A 1 Thru A Right A A Right A Peds i Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 5.0 5.0 76.0 15.0 Yellow 9.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 125.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group, Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 191 1805 0.34 0,65 9.3 TR 3142 5168 0.79 0.61 19.8 Westbound L 292 1805 0.51 0.78 32.4 TR 3596 5166 0.51 0.70 9.1 Northboun d L 165 1378 0.22 0.12 50.4 TR 214 1786 0.64 0.12 59.0 Southboun d L 121 1005 0.12 0.12 49.6 TR 226 1883 0.22 0.12 50.2 Interse ction Delay = 1.7.7 (sec/v eh) A B 19.5 B C A 10.8 B D E 57.2 E D D 50.0 D Intersection LOS = B secs HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.21 Analyst: MRY Inter.: Gulf to Bay anal Duncan Ave Agency: Lincks & Associates, Inc. Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/13/2008 Jurisd: City of Clearwater Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2009 Project ID: Background Traffic E/W St: Gulf to Bay Blvd N/S St: Duncan Ave SIGNALLED INTERSECTION SiJMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I~ T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes i 1 3 0 I 1 3 0 ( 0 1 0 [ 0 1 0 i LGConfig I L TR I L TR LTR j LTR I Volume I2$ 2323 20 p96 1838 37 127 25 43 138 25 8 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 1 12,0 I RTOR Vol 1 1 I 6 1 16 1 3 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A Right A Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 9.0 89.0 15.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 A11 Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 126.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 212 1805 0.14 0.79 7.5 A TR 3446 5169 0.74 0.67 19.7 B 14.6 B Westbound L 189 1805 0.55 0.79 29.8 C TR 3442 5163 0.59 0.67 11.6 $ 12.7 B Northbound LTR 189 1588 0.45 0.12 53.9 D 53.4 D Southbound LTR 172 1445 0.42 0.12 53.2 D 53.2 D Intersection Delay = 15.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.21 Analyst: MRY Inter.: Gulf to Bay and Duncan Ave Agency: Lincks & Associates, Inc. Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/13/200$ Jurisd: City of Clearwater Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2009 Project ID: Background + Project Traffic E/W St: Gulf to Bay Blvd N/S St: Duncan Ave SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION S[3MMARY IEastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes I 1 3 0 I 1 3 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I LTR I LTR Volume I32 2321 20 I96 1841 39 I27 26 43 146 26 8 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 I 12.0 RTOR Vol I 1 I 6 I 16 I 3 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A Thru A { Thru A Right ~ A I Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 9.0 84.0 15.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 126.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group' Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 211 1805 0.37 0.79 7.8 TR 3446 5169 0.74 0.57 19.6 Westbound L 189 1805 0.55 0.79 29.7 TR 3441 5162 0.59 0.67 11.8 Northbound LTR 188 1576 0.46 0.12 53.5 Southbound LTR 169 1417 0.49 0.12 54..2 Intersection Delay = 15.1 (sec/veh) A B 14.6 B C B 12.7 B D 53.5 D D 54.2 D Intersection LOS = B secs 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 r r HCSf: Signalized Intersections Release 5.21 Analyst: MRY Tntez.; Gulf to Bay & Keene Rd Agency: Lincks & Associates, Inc. Area Type: All. other areas Date: 3/13/2008 Jurisd: City of Clearwater Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2009 Project ID: Background Traffic E/W St: Gulf to Bay Blvd N/S St: Keene Rd SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 3 0 ( 1 3 0 1 1 3 1 I 1 3 1 I LGConfig 1 L TR I L TR I L T R I L T R I Volume 1323 1949 153 1311 1688 271 1186 1188 290 1210 855 251 I Lane Width 11.2.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 49 I 18 1 0 I 3 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds J Peds WB Left A A A I SB Left A A Thru A A ! Thru A Right A A I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 21.0 12.0 43.0 ll.fl 22.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 139.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Belay LOS Eastbound L 328 1805 1.04 0.46 103.3 F TR 158$ 5134 1.36 0.31 215.2 F 200.9 F Westbound L 561 1805 0.58 0.63 33.9 C TR 2227 5075 0.92 0.44 43.3 D 41.9 D Northbound L 198 1805 0.99 0.28 103.5 F T 819 5176 1.53 0.16 302.1 F 258.0 F R 256 1615 1.19 0.16 176.5 F Southbound L 19$ 1805 1.12 0.28 142.8 F T 819 5176 1.10 0.16 120.5 F 124.0 F R 256 1615 1.02 0.16 119.9 F Intersection Delay = 153.1 (sec/v eh) Intersection L OS = F HCS~-: Signalized Intersections Release 5.21 1 1 Analyst: MRY Inter.: Gulf to Bay & Keene Rd Agency: Lincks & Associates, Inc. Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/13/200$ Jurisd: City of Clearwater Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2009 Project ID: Background + Project Traffic E/W St: Gulf to Bay Blvd N/S St: Keene Rd I Eastbound I L T R I No. Lanes 1 1 3 0 LGConfig 1 L TR Volume 1324 1953 154 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ 44 Duration 0.25 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I I L T I R I L T R I 1 3 0 ~ 1 3 1 I 1 1 3 1 I L TR I L T R I L T R 1311 1691 271 X187 1188 290 1210 855 252 112.0 12.0 {12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I 18 1 0 I 3 Area. Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 $ EB Left A A 1 NB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru ~ A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A A A 1 SB Left A A Thru A A 1 Thru A Right A A [ Right. A Peds I Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right ~ WB Right Green 21.0 12.0 43.0 11.0 22.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 0 2 0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Cycle Length: 139.0 _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound _ L 328.. 1805 1.04 0.46 104.2 F TR 1588 5134 1.37 0.31 217.6 F 202.2 F Westbound L 561 1805 0.58 0.63 33.4 C TR 2227 5075 0.92 0.94 43.4 D 42.0 D Northbound L 198 1805 0.99 0.28 105.1 F T 819 5176 1.53 0.16 302.1 F 258.1 F R 256 1615 1,19 0.16 176.6 F Southbound L 198 1805 1.12 0.28 142.8 F T 819 5176 1.10 0.16 320.5 F 124.2 F R 256 1615 1.02 0.16 120.9 F Interse ction Delay =153.6 (sec/v eh) In tersection LOS = F secs HCS+: Unsignalized~lntersections Release 5.21 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 1 Analyst: MRY Agency/Co.: Lincks & Associates, Inc. Date Performed: 3/13/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Gulf to B.ay and Project Dr A 3urisdiction: City of Clearwater Units; U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2009 Project ID: Background + Project Traffic East/West Street: Gulf to Bay Blvd North/South Street: Project Dr A lntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Ad justments Major Street: Approach Eastbound _ Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1582 1248 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1719 13.56 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- __ __ Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 0 Configuration T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF O,g2 Hourly F1 ow Rate, HFR 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles p Percent Grade (°~' 0 0 Flared. Approach: Exists?/ ' Stor age / / Lanes 1 Configuration R Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m} (vph} v/c 95°s queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 9 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 I I R 34.1 B 1 398 0..00 0.01 19.1 B 1 1 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.21 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: MRY Agency/Co.: Lincks & Associates, Inc. Date Performed: 3/13/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Gulf to Bay and Project Dr B Jurisdiction: City of Clearwater Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2009 Project ID: Background + Project Traffic East/West Street: Gulf to Bay Blvd North/South Street: Project Dr B Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 _Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R volume 1582 1249 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0,92 O.g2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1719 1357 Percent Heavy Vehicles -~- -- __ __ Median Type/Storage Raised curb / 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 Configuration T T Upstream Signal? No No ~~finor street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R ! L T R Volume 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0 92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade (%) p 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement I 4 1 7 8 9 I 10. I1 12 Lane Config I I R v (vph) 2 C(m~ (vph)_ 399 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0..02 Control Delay 14.1 LOS _ B Approach Delay 14 1 Approach LOS B HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.21 TWO-WAX STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: MRY Agency/Co.: Lincks & Associates, Inc. Date Performed: 3/13/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Duncan Ave and Project Dr C Jurisdiction: City of Clearwater Units; U. S. Customary Analysis Year.: 2pOg Project ID: Background f Project Traffic East/West Street: Project Driveway C North./South Street: Duncan Ave Intersection Orientation: NS Study pe riod (hrs}: 0.25 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 7 90 ~ 71 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 g7 ~~ 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ~-- __ __ __ Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume 1 - 9 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (a} p 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Approach. Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound. Eastbound 1 4 f 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LT I I LR ~ ~ vpn ~ ~ _._ 10 C(m) (vph} 1533 905 v/c 0.00 0.01 95o queue length 0.01 0.03 Control Delay 7.4 8 $ LOS A A Approach Delay 8 8 Approach LOS A s A r r 1 1 u 1 1 1 1 1 2007 1=DOT GENERALIZED Q/LOS TABLES ~~C~~I~~ & ~S~®~B~`~~Sg III~#l~a 1 1 1 I. 1 v 1 1 r 1 1 TABLE 4 - 4 GENERALIZEa PEAK HOUR Tl~lO-WAY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S uRe~,n~vFn ARFarc* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided 210 730 1,456 2,060 2,620 4 Divided 1,94D 3,140 4,540 5,870 6,670 6 Divided 2,90D 4,700 5,800 8,810 10,010 STATE TWO-V1'AY ARTERIALS Class 1 (>0.00 to 1. 99 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided ** 400 1,310 1,560 1,610 4 Divided 450 2,780 3,300 3,390 *"* 6 Divided 700 4,40 4,950 5 080 *** 8 Divided 890 , 5,510 6,180 6,440 *** Class li {2.D4 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided ** I8D 1,070 1,460 1,550 4 Divided ** 390 2;470 3,110 3,270 b Divided ** 620 3,830 4,680 4,920 8 Divided ** 8D0 5,060 b,050 6.360 Class IIl (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mi]e and not. within primary city central business district of an urbanized area. over 750;000) FREEWAYS Interchange spacing > 2 mi. apart Level of Service Lanes A B C D E 4 2,310 3,840 5,350 6,S1D 7,240 b 3,580 5,930 8,270 10,050 11.180 8 4,840 8,020 11,180 13,6D0 15,130 ] 0 6, 110 10:110 14,110 17,160 19,050 12 7,360 12,200 17,020 20,710 23,DD0 Interchange spacing <2 mi. apart Level of Service Lanes A B C D E 4 2,050 3,350 4,840 6,250 7,1]0 6 3,240 5,250 7,600 9,840 ] 1, I $0 8 4,420 7,160 I0,360 13,420 15,240 10 S,b00 9,070 13,130 16,980 19,310 12 6,780 10,980 ] 5,890 20,560 23,350 BICYCLE MORE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle. mpde in khis table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.} (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shov,~tt below by number of directional roadway lanes to determinetwo-way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder Level of Service Bicycle Lane Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E Coverage A B C D >~ 2 Undivided ** ** 500 1,200 1,470 0-44% ** ** 310 1 310 >1 310 4 Divided ** ** 1,180 2,750 3,120 I , , 50-84°/a ** 240 390 >390 *** 6 Divided ~** *" 1,850 4,240 4,690 85-100% 300 680 >680 *** *** 8 Divided =* °* 2.,450 5,580 6,060 PEDESTRIAN MODE Class IV (more than 4.S signalized intersections per mile and within (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway primary city central business district of an urbanized area geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not. number of pedestrians over 750,DOD} using the facility.) {Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number Level of Service of directional roadway lanes to determine tvvo-way maximum service volumes.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided ** ** 490 1,310 1,420 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** "* 1,170 ~,88D 3,010 0-49% ~ ** ** ** 6D4 1 480 5 Divided ** ** 1,810 4,350 4,520 . 54-84°/a ** ** ** 940 1 800 8 Divided ** ** 2.460 5,690 5,910 , 85-100% ** 210 1,080 >1,080 *** NON-STATE ROADWAYS BIlS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) Major City/County Roadways (Buses per hour) Level of Service fNole: Hoses per hour shown are only for dte prak hour in ilte single dirttdau of hib'her traffic now.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Leve] of Service 2 Undivided ** ** 870 1,390 1,480 Sidewalk Coverage A $ C D E 4 Divided ** ** 2,030 2,950 3,120 0-84°/n ** >5 >4 >3 >2 6 Divided *# ** 3,17D 4,450 4.690 85-100°1 >6 >4 >3 >~ >I ARTERIALINON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS Other Signalized Roadways (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) {signalized intersection analysis) Leve€ of Service Lanes Median Left Tutus Lanes Adjustment Factors Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Divided Yes +5% 2 Undivided ** ** 450 95D 1,200 2 Undivided No _2p% 4 Divided *° ** 1.OSG 2.070 2,400 Multi Undivided Yes -5% Source: Florida Department of Transportation 05/17/07 Multi Undivided No -25% Systems Alarming Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 ONE-WAY FACILITIES Tallahassee, FL 32394-0450 Multiply the correspondingtwo-directional volumes in this table by 0 6 blip://www.dot.state.fl, uslplanning/systemslsm/Iosldefault.htm . . 'Values shown ¢re presented as hourly two-way vokumes for levels of service and era For the automobile/rruck modes unhss specifically sorted- Although presented as peak hour two-way volumes, they anually represent pack; hour peal: direnlon conditions with an applicable D facmr applied This ruble does not constitute n standard end should be used onl for eneral laguin li ti T y g p g app ca ons. he wmputer models fibm avhidr this table is derived should be used for more speciRc plertrdng applications. The table end deriving computer models Should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where mare refined techniques i ex st. Laval of service letter grade thresholds are probably not tompamble across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overnll roadway kavel of service is not recommended. Calculations ere Tr¢n5it Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively farthe autamabile/trucl:, bicycle, hazed on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Mgdel, Pedestrian LOS Mode3 and pedestri¢n and bus modes. "Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. •••NOI applicable for drat level of service letter grade. For amomobilekruck modes, volumes gr eater then level of service b become F because intersection capacities have been reached Fot bicycle and destrian modes, the {goal of service letter grade findudiaa F} is not achievable, because there is no meximerm vehicle volume threshold using table input value d°faults