Loading...
FLD2007-09028 (2)FLD2007-09028 1001 S FT HARRISON AVE OR OAKS PROFESSIONAL C PLANNER OF RECORD : WW ATLAS # 295B ZONING: C LAND USE: CG RECEIVED: 09/04/2007 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DR.C CI)B: CLW CoverSheet C Clearwater .? Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE SNKR, I, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company 1815 Health Care Drive, Trinity, FL 33655 FAX NUMBER: EMAIL: '~ NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A} APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER PROPERTY OWNERS}: List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL. NUMBER: SNKR. L LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company ___J James Evans / Northside 300 South Belcher Road 727-443 2869 Inc. FAx NUMBER: 727-446-8036 ___ _ EMAIL: l eVanS~nOCthSldeenglneerln~.COm S. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Cade PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBERS): PARCEL SIZE (acres}: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Harbor Oaks Medical Center 1001 S. Ft. Harrison CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials}: DATE RECEIVED: n 4-202.A) PROJECT VALUATION: $ 3 15/29/15/54450/034/0010; 15/29/1.5/54450/034/0090; 15/29/15/54450/034/0030 15/29/15/54450/03/0240; 15/29/15/54450/034/0110 1.27 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 55,295.00 S.F. ,ree Construction. Plans and Survey _..._.- ._._ PROI=OSED usE(s}: Medical Offices & Medical Clinics DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See F1eXlble Deve10 meat Application N Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage ofnon-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. ~www.w~w.r.wM~i.~i iuuid iii ~d ®RIGINAf. ~CEIVED CIiY OF parking spaces~gs~IF~ Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infell Project (FLD} Q4-24-07.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (T,D~ A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ~ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7} D. ^ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6} GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. ~~ ~ -~ 2. The proposed development will not hinder ar discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ORIGINAL 1C6b6lvcu OCT 1 ~ 2~J7 C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 2 of S PIANNING DEPARTkYiEAfi CITYOF CLEARWATER WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria} .ff7j Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CF2ITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use andlor development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district 3. The development or redevelopment will not. impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new andlor preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development wiEl not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Ghanges in horizontal building planes; ~[21GIf3A1. Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings,~1+rllli~etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ©r~ ~ C 207 ^ Building stepbacks; and l,, E) UU ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate di.~~~~yq~-I{~gs. CRY ©F CLEARWATER C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms,07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. AEI applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface,. including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ,~'~ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PIAN shall include the following; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ,Crl~ Ap adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; t~ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ~~ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT WOUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): - `~' .,~•_ Stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ~ID 'SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY {including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ;~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, / including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ,® TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; -~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ ~ PARKING DBMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). ,Inert ~ Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; I~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ORIGINA'~ ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); RECEN~D ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ~~~ P#ANMMG DEPARYMENf CCTV OF CLEARWA~ER C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (Section 4-202.A} SITE PLAN with the fallowing information (not to exceed 24" x 36"}: ,Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _~__ All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanics! equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and ]ndex #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: c/ Land area in square feet and acres; W Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility r/ easement; _W__W_. Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (LS.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 `h X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management far the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned}; Structural overhangs; C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD} 04-24-07.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSGAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ~/ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _~ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including Eandscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); ,e Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant iJ schedule; / Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all / existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; e Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and +J' protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched andlor shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; _~ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yx X 9 f ); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; All sides of all buildings; pimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; "~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 Y= X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS !Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.}, indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required}. © Reduced signage proposal (8'/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. 47RIGINAI C;1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktop\planningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-~i;~~~gG's~CPARTMEIVT Page 6 of 8 CiiY QF Ct.E9,R4VATER FC. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: {Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.Cf 0 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or hislher designee ar if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service far any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ^ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour andlor 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment andlor intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffc Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ~ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS SEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS! WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe andlor fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compiiance with the 2004 Florida ire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Ackno edgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the fiollowing): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIE4N RESULTS W THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS! WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: !, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 tom y who is personally ~. produced REG property owner or representative as identification. o- '~;~ i.+s~ y Notary public, My commission expires: ';~~~ t't~['.~4 C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: 2. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: {describe request) 4. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and {does/do) appoint: as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (Ilwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ____ -------- Property Owner ~ Property Owner Property Owner ~ ~ Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL4A5 Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that helshe fully understands the contents of the affidavit that helshe signed. Notary Public Signature ~tG~ O Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: ~'~~ P1l~G pFP ~~ ~ ~R P m pF ~;ts~ C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project {FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 8 of 8 .~ _.~., _ . , N, AFFt[7AVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 7. Provide names of all property owner6 an deed -- PRiN'6 tuff names: $NKxiXX LLC 2. That (I embus are) the owner(s) and record tine holder(s) of the following descibed property (address or general location): 10(!1 S. Ft. ftarrisoa, Clearwater 3. That Phis property constKutes the property for which a rsyussE for a: (desafbe request) 21,000 aguare foot medical office /medical Glinio with site itnprovementa _ 4. That the undersigned (haslhave}appointed and (dossido) aRPoint Northeide Engin®ering 8erv'icea, Tnc. as (hlSJtheir) agents} fo exearte any petitions or ocher documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed !a Induce the City of Ciearwaisr, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 8. That efts vfsl~ to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; _... 7. That {Ihve), the undersigned authorfty, heroby certify that the toregoing Is true and co ~~L -- _ _ _ _ ______r. _._ ._ ___. _ . _ fij~,~wi T' _ Property Owner property Owner Property Owner T ,Property Owner STATE OF FLORID/4,. COUNTY pF PIiVELLAS BeTore me the undersigned, an oHfcer duty comrnlssianed by the lawsfof the S~~arEda. on the ~ *- -~__... (~ ~~ ..- day of ,x2~a'Z~,G~.,!/I) ~ personalty appeared ~~Oa~ _ - . _ • -- who having been first duly sworn Deposes a7nd says that helsha fully understands the contents of the affidavit that hel r. Notary SeallSfamp My .=ti•o ~ s, ~. ~ #a D454243 .• v . ~ ~ , surance ~ . ~~O ~~ C:1€Jocumenis and Sattingslderek.fergusonWesldapiptanningtortns__07tY~nsiyr~Im~Prois~~Ff_D) 0424-07.doc ®~IJ~{~. R~~EIVED OCT 1 ~ 2QQ7 PlANN1NG DEPAR7NfENT CITY OF CLEARWATER LETTER OF AUTHOR~ZATlON This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (agent Name) with Nor~hside Enginee~ng $eryic~. Inc. to act as an agent for SNRKI Inc. (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 1001 S. Ft. Harrison, Clearwater, Florida (Property Location) PINELLAS County, State of FLORIDA. ~12~~ ~~~ Signature of Property Owner ~"o ~.sr~..•,o ~-~"~ Address of Property Owner .09 ~ S~~at City/State/Zip Code Print Name of Property Owner -- Title Z~7 -B~aP -~/YL Telephone Number State of The foregoing instrument was acknowled before me this ~ ~ day County of ~~~ , 20 d3, b , as ~ who is personally known to me or who has produced \\\~~~\\\\~~~~US~////~~~/ identifcation and who did (did not) take an oath. ti ~~,•.... • CFii ~.~M~SSIOryE~.•A_% #DDa54243 ,~•~i~nature) r ~/, . ~ :n. ~.'#ed'n"a any • pQ /~~I~~AU~I ~ ~O~\\\\\~~mmlSSl # //~11lNII I111~\\\ (SEAL ABOVE) Notary 'Public (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stam~~i~ OCT 1 ~ 2001 PIANNIt~G DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARYVATER FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Tnfill Redevelopment Project 1001 S. Fort Harrison FLD2007-09028 NES Project # 731 Description of Request: Flexible Development to permit a 19,814 square feet mixed use development consisting of office and medical clinic uses in the Commercial (C) and the Office (O) Districts with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet(to building and pavement) along South Ft. Harrison, a reduction to the front (North) setback from 25 feet to 7.5 feet (to pavement) along Magnolia Drive, reductions to the side(south) setback from 10 feet to 7.5(to building) and to 6.5 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 7 feet to building and to b.8' (to dumpster enclosure and pavement), as a Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C, and a reduction to the front perimeter buffer along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 7.5'. Request for a building height increase from 25' to 29' (to flat roof), and from 25' to 46' for the architectural tower. Parking (Required number of spaces based upon the requirements of each individual use as shown within the Table 2-703. "C" District Flexible Development Standards} Required: Medical Clinic: 3 Spaces per 1,000 = 30 Office: 4 Spaces per 1,000 = 41 Spaces Total: 71 Spaces Froposed: Total: 71 Spaces General Applicable Standards (Section 3-913(A) : 1. The pxoperty is zoned "C" and allows a F.A.R of 0.55, respectively the project is proposed in general conformance with these standards. The proposed development will be in harmony with the character of the adjacent developments and surrounding area which hosts a mixture of similar commercial and medical offices. The building setbacks that we are proposing exceed the neighboring building located to the North on Magnolia which has a zero front setback along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue and the newly approved Harbor Oaks townhome project with a front building setback off S. Ft. Harrison of only 10'. The proposed site design, height anal building design will be compatible and consistent with. the new developments in the area. ~ ~ o ~ 0 ~ c'v ~~ ~ e~ ~ ~: ~ ~~ a' 1 2. The proposed. development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent. land and buildings or significantly impair the values as redevelopment of this site will promote investment and encourage redevelopment of the surrounding land and buildings. The current assessed value of the vacant land is $1.,760,000, with a projected value of $-3-;;000,0:00 upon completion of the project, thereby providing improved land values to the surrounding sites, grid increased assessment to the city of Clearwater. 3. No health or safety issues are anticipated with the proposed development; the proposed uses comply with the existing zoning, are appropriate and similar with adjacent developments, and, will not create any negative effects on the surrounding properties. The redevelopment plan includes responsible site drainage; improvements to access and the pedestrian. pathways, in addition to a new building which meets current building code and FEMA requirements to further improve the heath and, safety of the surrounding community. 4. The development proposal provides improvements to aide in minimizing traffic congestion through the deletion of two access point along South Fort Harrison (Alt. U.S. 19) and the installation of a new two way access along the secondary street Magnolia Drive. Additionally the new driveway access has been located at the greatest distance possible from the intersection of South Fort Harrison and Magnolia. Drive far exceeding Access Management Standards to further improve safe office, fire and solid waste traffic accessibility. 5. The immediate vicinity is currently characterized by mixed land use patterns; the proposed mixture of Medical office with Medical, Clinic use on the second floor will be consistent with the community character and will provide additional commercial support to the surrounding area. The proposed development uses and urban design. elements are consistent with the desires for the area; the design will blend beautifully with the community character and. will provide further enhancement and. support to the surrounding environment. G. No adverse effects associated with visual, acoustic; olfactory and hours of operation are anticipated as these items are addressed and minimized through appropriate and responsible design. The design, number and location . of the driveway; the proposed mixture of uses and the architectural design of the building together with the proposed hours of operation (Monday -Friday Sam-Spm) all play a part in accomplishing rninimalization of any anticipated adverse effect. ~U a O oe _ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ `~ ~ U F..~ ~ LL} C 2 Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria 1. Due to the properties irregular shape and narrow lot width at points, the site would be impractical to develop without deviations. Additionally, to provide an access point along Magnolia that is appropriately distanced from the intersection of Magnolia and Ft. Harrison, together with the objective to -maintain appropriate access spacing from the Pinellas Trail, the location of the access drive and parking layout is somewhat predetermined fox this site; largely it is due to the irregular shape and access restrictions that this request includes setback and landscape buffer reductions. 2. The proposed uses, site and architectural design is in conformance with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan, as well the purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of the code; the proposed rise, design and function is appropriate for the neighborhood and surrounding community. 3. The project, as proposed will not impede the normal and orderly development of the improvement of surrounding properties. The project is expected to improve, not impair value of the property and the adjacent properties. Further, the location of the development, uniquely situated adjacent to the Pinellas Trail, will result in the improvement of approximately 270 linear feet of the Pinellas Trail boundary with professionally designed landscaping, providing rewards and benefit to the entire community. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer detriment as a result of this development; the development of this vacant property will increase property values for the surrounding area. The projects location within. a "hospital area" with such close proximity the hospital will only support the community and provide new additional employment opportunities. With the proposed mixture of uses, together with the site and architectural design, no negative impacts are anticipated. 5. The immediate vicinity is currently characterized by mixed land use pattern; the proposed mixture of Medical. officelMedical Clinic use on the first floor will be consistent with the community character and will provide the desired commercial support to the surrounding area. The proposed development. uses and urban design elements are consistent with the desires for the area and will blend beautifully with the community character, providing further enhancement and support to the surrounding .environment. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard and flexible development use, o° ~, a~ ~~ ~~ ~ a 3 6. Re-development of the subject property is in close accordance with the goals, policies, and olajectives of the City of Clearwater and will continue to upgrade the area. a. Practical development of this property requires deviations from development standards for setbacks and buffers primarily due to the irregular shaped lot. The proposed setbacks, design and use ,are consistent and compatible with the newly approved Harbor Oaks town home project in addition to many of the other surrounding developments. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties in anyway. This proposed development will further promote the positive redevelopment pattern of the area. b. There are no adopted applicable design guidelines for this area. c. The proposed development and design supports the established character of development (commercial, office, medical clinic uses) along this stretch of S. Ft. Harrison Avenue with many existing developments having reductions to building setbacks, and landscape buffers. d. The proposed building design incorporates elements such as changes in horizontal building plans, columns, and a variety in materials. Also offered within the architectural. are distinctive roofs forms to achieve a building that is interesting, attractive and will fit nicely in to the surrounding built environment. e. The proposed development provides appropriate buffers featuring three tiered colorful landscaping, designed by a professional landscape Architect. The proposed. development will benefit the community character and property values above and. beyond. the required developrrient standards. The front and most of the side yards will be heavily planted, which will provide a pleasing appearance for this project. To improve the visual aspect of this area and properties involved, the existing overhead utility lines traversing along the Magnolia Street frontage will also be placed underground. d IVES 73 T - 1001 - S. Ft. Han ison -1E 10.12.07 1 ~ ~ N . A `~ ~ '~ ~ L.,) C~ ~~ ~3 W U z0 ~~~ 4 08/31/2007 15:52 7274468036 Clearwater NDRTFiSIDE ENG SUDS Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Tefepho ne. 727.562567 Pax: 727562-4865 O. SU6MIT ORIGINAL 3,~G,NED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION C7 SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and appilcatlon are required 10 tx collared. 5blplEd and folded into sets PAGE 02/03 cAsE Nu~I~ER: RECEIVED BY {Stall Inhlals): DATE RECEVED: ,t NpTE; A TOTAL OF 15 StaT3 OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL 5t1PPORTING OpGUEAE~#ITATION IS Ftt:QUIRED TtJ BE SUBMITTt.D IN CONJUNCTION YVrTH A COMPLETE. LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWD APPLICAT1tNl. COMPREHENS~V~ LANDSCAPE ~'R~GRAM (Rcviscd 04/24/2007) MPLEASE TYx'~ OE kRiIYT~ APPLfCANT, PRUPEF~TY OWNER ANf] AGENT IMF©Rfil1ATION: (Code Section d-202.A) APPLI6ANT NAME: ....._--~~~~,,,~'l~ ._.,_..... __....~------•• .....__.__t-- - MAILINGAaDRE55: ~+ - ,-- -- _-__...._--- _~..~G~..:_t~..~.L~-,r.¢--~~ PHONE NUMBER: ?~'j-_,~`4..~~..~-.,~..._ FAx NUMBER: _-_._~......_._ .....------- CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: _ ._..___.. ..,~1.+1~_..__....... PROPERT'r'OwNER(S): _... ,~~,__.!d!'.~'4~t _.._. , .---..+~~__C~C~L LFyt ,at{, owners on the deeA ~ AGENT NAME: ~~-..,,~~O~~I ~~ ..l--=t!•~~,'_f! VC~~~_li~~..~~~ _ ~ ~ MAILINCAODRESS: _~d~._J_c..~Q~!lr'' ~.$~,C'G~~'L~F.C..r~~.----__..... -_.... _ - Q ~~ ~ PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: p~___ FAx NUN-9ER: _, ~___~_ ~~~~~~ ~~ Xf~~~ 7b~=O..~~3 EMAIL: e~,Q~,~j~Q ~~ • ~._ 1_ AriCWITECTURAL TMEriIE: a. The landscaping in a Compn3hansive Landscape Pnapram shsn be destgnad as a pan of the arch[tectural tl+eme of the princlpar bulldings proposed or developed on the parral proposed for the development. OR b. The deslpn, crtsrecter, lacadon sno/or materials of the tendsr:ape treatment proposed In Ihra Comprehensive Landscape Program shall he demonstrably more attractive than laneeeaping ollltlrWil;9 pem~iNed on the parcel proposed far dev2lapment under the Minimum 12rdst~pe standards. C:IDocuments and Settings~derek.ferguBpnlpesMoplpfenninglorms_Q70TCompfehensNe Landscape Pn~ram U4-~~-tt7.doc Page t of Z ORiGINAt ~MEtJ OCR 15 2~J~ PfANMING t3EpAt7fM£i~tt' Ci1Y O~ CtEARWATEI~ 08/31/2007 15:62 7274468036 NpRTHSIBE ENG SVCS PAGE 03/03 i'. '7. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape Ireatrnenl pro ed in the Camprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the t:omnwnlty ettaraclrar of the Clry of Ctealweter, 3. PROPERTY vALtJES: The landscape triaatrrrent proposed in the Gompr~hensive Landscape Program +viq have a beneficial impact on the value of the properly in tho Immediate vicinKy of Ihe~ar~el pr0~osed for development. 4. SPECIAL AREA QR 3CENtC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment prvpesed In the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any spacipf area or scenic wrtidor plan which M+e C~ of Clearwater lt~~pare and dvpted iw »,e area !n which ttre parcel propnged for development is located. THE LANbSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 8. DIVISION f2 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. AS TMl' CASE MAY SE, IF THE APPLIGATION FOR DEIJELOPMENT APPROVAL lNCLUOES A COMPfiEHEN$IVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFI1wS THE A9OVE CRITERIA, THE USE OF LANpSCAPE PLANS. SECTIONS t ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPEG7'IVES MAY 8E NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATItgtV PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that ek representation9 made in this application are true and accurate t0 the best er my knowledge and authorize City rripresenlalives >o visit and Rhobograph the property dea~;ribed in this application. SianeturQ or property owne or representatlv6 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY DF PINE A~ Swo to nd 6 bscribed before me this day or ~ , A.C). 20 b nre and/or by ~ . uvtw Is persona#ly known has produce as i tlflcatlan ~• My *~ ~ o~N ~~ r O a #D ~- ' • ~. r~///~~~~ll ~l ~I ~ N1C1~~\\\\`,~~~ C'IDACUmPnts and SE•ttirl~slderek.ler{Tus~tllDeSktOptpf~rtnrrtgfArms 070TICpmprgNens a Prpgt~Rr 04.24-f)7.lfoc Page ~ of 2 'REGEI1fED ocT ~ ~ 2ao~ PAWNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Exhibi# "A" Comprehensive Landscape Program Requirements 1001 S. Ft. Harrison Ave - NES #731 Request: A reductian to the landscape buffer along Magnolia Drive from 14' to 7.5'. 1. Architectural Theme A: The landscape is in concert with the local. development maximizing landscape treatment and enhancing architectural themes. B: The landscape treatment has been maximized on the property without jeopardizing drainage patterns, underground or overhead utilities, and the function of the building. 2. Landscape treatment is designed to give years of benefits without the disruption of building function, drainage and utilities. 3. The landscape treatment will benefit value by providing aesthetically pleasing views while providing climate control for building and parking areas. 4. The development is not located within. a Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. c~Ri~rN~ ~EC~n~~ OCT 15 2~~7 PtANN~NG ~EPARTiJIEN'f CRY OF CLEARWATER Traffic Narrative The proposed development is stated to consist of a total of 19,814 S.F. of medical office/medical clinic. This traffic narrative will demonstrate that section 3-1406.B.2 (40' Stacking distance) is not applicable to this site. We have designed the onsite parking drive thru access to align with the access driveway on Magnolia Drive, which yields a 110' stacking length. This 110' Stacking length well exceeds the required 40' stacking length. Furthermore the new access drive off Magnolia has been. located at the greatest distance possible from the intersection of S. Ft. Harrison. and Magnolia Drive, which. far exceeds Access Management Standards and will further improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians. Magnolia Drive is not a through roadway, ending at the office complex to the East of the site, and has minimal traffic flow. Due to such minimal traffic flow along Magnolia it is expected that the throat reduction from 40' to 26' will not create adverse traffic conditions along Magnolia Drive. ~~ ~+~ G3 W I~it ® ~ C'~l ~ } ~ 7 pQ~ d W W W ~ W y-~i ~ U ' '~ ~ p..,. LL.3 ~ , ~ Z ~ ~ _ ~U n _ ___ oasrrs snorKx o C~~ gb ~o~ ~ ~ ~~~ T ~i 1 ~~~ ~ ALLEN (PJ 1lSAGNOLIA DRIVE _ _ inr 9 /yam ~ ~---..,. 7 7 ' , r ~ ~ ti 4 O ~ `` O % 2-STORY ~ Er I~ 3 ~. MEDICAL BUILpING ., R; ~ fsl FLOOR LEDICAL CIJNfC 8,786 S.F: - (y ~ I 2nd FLOOR MEDICAL OFFICE 10,018 S.F. x~l ° o°~ `~ ~ o ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~..r.P ~_~ o ~ i soar aom fA11[ _~~ ~_~ ,,,,, H 88'18'5" E 1105' m N J ^ W 2 d ~ r~enncwr e 1 .... ~ u ~~f' w ~~.r or~...o ..1 ~~ 4 y t W x 4 C Q L~ 0 Q N u U L v qJ U C f~ .~ a~ 0 (n O O 0 O Q U O LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~AEsi1I 11AYp ~ e[~~ S ,~ 4 ~ x wac ,®av aF nieia 1rML NOOt 1[Q11B /111A 111RV PE ~~ .Nl ,AV ,lirlr ~ ^tl' 11/r Elff Gr ID la{ RIDE k V MPCl1lMf iYm1 I~ .N ~ x rnk' .u 111rds~M MM' a swwl a a n,a new ~®w tis soE s AIZ µ rt we Femme ors H[4.R CGIII% N 1101 FLOOD ZONE INFORIVIATION: M MOK Eblslm HOIO~!! AlKAM 70 YL r111M IIOv mt Y ~ IILOn ~RYIQ rR 11Y 1x/01W19M rv a1+1m. +VO~/>toes wo ~M ~a11°~sauioi n •. rro r .r.1~ wr~YaY m arm~inl ~r s1°~° suasol. °i® use arrtly rr,o a ousa sJI1,M SECTION15,TOWNSHIP29S, RANGE 15 E CITY OF CLEARWATER PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CT II~LC. I'~ 1 SITE DATA __ __ ..__....._ _ _ _ _ ~_..- ~ EXISEIN6 (E) -_ --moans roar m~ r~ L111NIR ~ - ~-o i Q 1 PROPOSED (P) 1~ REgUIRED aml 1rm( ma nm~' mm nml F~Nea er wim __ e --~ ~ a 3 s _ _ u0W6 ~ f rAtlMF € nolsr~ ~ a c ~ 1® It ! MN -.} 1 -- VF L i Y ~ .~91 L ^ V i ° ' loi ACA, _ _-- . . . ~,_t_~ ~o. ~ ~} rc I mru. ~~„ ar__ i=i K_ ~ . . 1.7s K~_~, „i _~ {c I ia® u~ aem v. rmi~ s>ra sF_ ~r ie , .` __ auor mrolo ~ ( rso u , i --- ~ Aarw.w~w uu _ vs - . - o M100[ Ad1 (tfk fwla ( ~_-_-_- 7Jtl V. _ IOPN 1r.Q~ V. CJl1VM7 0.! a! ~' FLY(IQ m ~ ~_ ~ m .~..: ~ sm - ~ u~ m a ~ ~ - 1 f7 y ---_ ; v-nai pp ~ svs ~ sea Imns ~__.Y...W._ ~ ,..~~ . 3 r try. Ar --- -- - - -~_ afAlrt r6s~us 1~ 1010OI4 fY~AR M70 i ' ~ I ~--~ ---udsir. a V.1~ u~'~ j ~ n __ _ ___ 1SM7 l/. I - ar sa i ~ 10ELL1 A.t1a L. Gill ~ p a _~__-___~ 7~11a v. E F 1 M~ ~ µI1 v.. j -_-__.~--__ ,oml a ~ i07O 7IIq QV• t _ _ - _ _ ien1. ~tifs_ u, a _ ~s ~ W IMm~ un some tAloswsa ar. ^ ^ s r.u.V~ v i+s in. u. ~ - I ~.:+. _; r~m~ - _._._ ii"" ---- 3 ---~5 _ _ fl-n pL~ -(- ''~ _ _iR~tfer 1 ~W E ~_~~_. .11 f/0 ~..... _- - slow wa.uo~ ~'~.R"k 1e1.. ~. - u~ v. nx v.. , . ^ r.m :""~ - LEGEND ~ . Fxor.awln.~ -._. -;L~- IOF ClM9tOM NAM ter slot o1a , Id 801X1 LBAQ - ------ l0 YEnmMM ...~ .~.~~..e....~~ Off. !/IL lOlrll _ _ iea srK m •~- ._ -, _.,.. -... ~-•-~-•-~-~- omr. >rvA mna ••-m I~r ~1111t aGYQ ~ ................ IQ MET M MQ s1K rwnY • ..... ................. IO A411RT _ _--_ IO mQl[ >~.~~ rwr ar mFrsml a ~.. IIRIIr m ~ Y IE1Q wa rioaln~ naiator ma raw r1i ino rwr ~1a~ tae rR vlrrnnort mnremll T16 1£lIOYM ^aFa- TAY. w Ilo wX INDEX OF SHEETS C1.1 CIVIL SITE DATA 42.1 dENIOLITIdN SITE PLAN C3.1 STANING SITE PLAN CA.7 GRADING, DRAINAGE 8 UTILITIES SITE PLAN L5.9 LIVIL SITE DETAILS C5.2 CIViL SITE DETAILS L1.1 LANdSCAPE SITE PLAN L1.2 LANdS4APE NOTE580ETAILS L1.3 TREE PRESERYATION PLAN NES Comn_ 0]31 or..,, gJ.`/. ehsi:ea Br. `N.F. H. Issue Dace: oa~nro] Rev a nnan l:lu n~ V U q N Z O 6 ~ ~ ~o a_LL O K ~ ~a N ~ ~Y ~ V Ggag ~I ~I ~ . m v~ Q ~i rn "'- C: (': C`~1 -C1 I`- 0 I G 9 G 4) l/~ N C N U G C 0 N v 0 d 0 O O O ~; r- L' rn 0 C N07ES: _ .wwrnn t.~°r ~_ NPDES NOnFlCAT/DN Aga twa ~u uc~ era°e r-`s°ia'~i.~lr~arre:e ~~~e~ra~~.ra ~r~ ~r~~~ ~~~ s~s~ i~ ~~s~i'rrxrlr~ ~~ u ~ ia~ ~ ~a~ `OSs rr ~~ ` ~~l: w .f"ee s .~.~ Jp7G ~... N ... ao..r~ 9.T lD1CLS AAG fAIRmLMf OOIIIAY ICASI.pE9 I11lTl 6' M MACE 1'iIOR ro L101lS7i4CIA4W NO E WPTAlO IIZOfAOY TIE PASiCT. 1.~~ of I~~mOP r emv Q ra IE1~ N 1W ~OII A L1w11~I 111<MP r OORII IY! 116 !A 116 ILIi iYYl 6 Yk Air.1~i b 9E 1 !/~ ~ f4.0~ ° ~ ~ ~outu1c11~ X r+M'tum.+ M1°iot~a~ e a ~ 1 ~ o 3 ~ ti m ~ ; ° 1 ~iiln~~u ~ ouo ~ C~IWf 1MIm 70it ~ D S ' ^ ~ t~ imoc b6na 7I~s j ' ~ ~ o aus~ie wr ~s~n~w--i '' Di ~ u~ ~ ~ ~ ~n e~ b °i~ ° i ^a 6101[ ~iJl NIIYII ~ ^m'X "~'If r O 4~ t YL fM11 ~ esJY6s IIOtIW FICY IEIniIL a pp 11Sb !per RD. KLf4 ~~ liW'S sal NO f¢E Nd[ 9YtL S Fufn YIN M~4FL K ~ ' _ 8 . ~ $ 0 Sn ~"^.+~ ~ ~"'SS Y/bri WSFIHL NO CCIfICfm N f? Viii W ~INL OF Ii01 GEOIY. a Yf j g 7 PR-nS ~vi1L ? IiR11O MO 4VOIA1CIE11 ®41 YWL GfOil M Ri Wrt 9 _ 0 ~ ~ ~ Y a ~i~ n racy, ue : ~ ti $~ c4 Y n p ~,.. ~ ~ a 3 e y e ~ Z ye . s' 8 g ~' ~ $ ~- ~° s 49 9i~T~ w {{{ oa 444 ALLEN (I~j f2.9~ _ _- - ^° ~ ° ~{AGNOLIA DTcIUE(Fj m ,_..~-___-.---- -- _, ------~~"~'~` ,~' .,.~., _ a~ _..... ~ 't i aw r ~e'~n _ n~ESC~.. 877 ors..ea r i _.._ _ ._.~ _._ _. ~. .. ... _._ _ .~._. .._-.~ _=. r. ____..-_=T_ --~ .._... _ _ .~e T -~c= _ ' -_ - - __ - __ _ __ cn.a.d ar W.F.H. i _ ~ _ K 4991:21' E ~ ~ .l3f.40' _ _ _ _o ~° - - --'-----~-- Issue Date oel74/m ma.,.~,-~ -----. 1, s +---- ~ Y '~~ ~~.~ serve ~~ ~„i Reasons ~ 1 ~ - 1}i ! walwa v .~, t, ~i ~_ ~~~ ~,' ~ Y 1 ~ • ~- ajEk~" 1 i tl ~ _; a'~era°r~ ° Z o e ~ ~~ app= ~'"~~' ~„ x V ::~°" ~~~~ k W °. v3 F 3 ~ ~ I t ~ Il ni W ~ ' .~ ~i ! 1 i~ ~ s .. .. '+l -~ j ~ ~- C ~ [ q ~ i ~~ F ~~ t~ O ~ j auiarrr v ~~ i~ =:~1 -» ~ Si'Sf w° i J ~ ~sers 1 SILT 9ARRIER ULTAIL ° 1 ~., a q __-'_~--~----'~----ro---~--~ r~ e 8~ s 4~sT~r w 1 ° ' n ~ ~ ~ m Z _ f o_ °" ~ ' ~ NORTH s ~ ~ ~-b&' $ R ~ ~ o c~c ~- '~a~~~`°'" ~ SCALE: i"=20' /^.".,.~ r srt§pr arm '£~ ~ IL9" ~ ~ 3 ~+ x hQ. o ~ aa~ Q :-AffiPD f1A]T 'R. ~ I 0 10 z0 o OO , ''i1 ° U A2.tlIbAI « 33.dJ ~4 rw .~. ~ ~l L~ ~~I N m d i_~ (_i L~ 0 ~~ r~ rr: i [`.I LC'i -o 0 N N U 6 C G N U O G O O O T I' -i O ~J i; Q ~~ ~~ O ~ ~` '-+ C O ,L v Q 0 ~ xa~' ~i ~F~"=z ~~ V =~ TU ~ h~® ~~~~$~ ~o s,~" W d? .g ,z s 3 ~_LL go ~acsc~_ oni ~m.n Br B..V. cnKk.a ey. W.F.H. Issue Dace o~3iro~ Rev w C 4 rJ ~ ~ zo o O o~ (~ ~ a o C~ Q x °` ~ 03 ~ '~ ~ Q Q s NW (~ ~ ° U ~e.n..v,,..~.a ,q'.,,„~P~.,....a, ~~~~ s'~°ec~a HfTfNTKM PQMP A41CS (I~r A~A+~O ~ oau[~IOq' 171141 -11ir~er avw,r io ~ ~I wr tone urn or ws __._. mpp om asi ~ ~~~ owr ~: r~or wr~~° N N s, U1 m Q M ~ .... r r~E ~`qt ~,~ emu. ~• \ I sECnori _A-A r._ -_ +~'~ -~ C` ~~.,~ Ii`t ET °"~`P °~r, j/~ °-~ - SECAGW C-C Z '-~ LAfE tlo 36.01E PLANE 0Ee C`ue55 SECTION B-0 ~ .~. is I r ~~~~ ~ Y. _..~ ~_._.__~~_._._ ~- j '' i I o oxnc mo.ER ~ ~.r ~~ ~ ~ N j t 8 qq E ~E'r - ~ '~7 U ~°'° E ~ a ss .a G ``` N ~ n ~ Q ~ K 3 ~ ~ ~ M 3 ~ ~ 1 i +~ 3 ~C6 , 2 ~~ 0 ~ t, `~ i +-: C `~' j~ " ~ ae:~i YEDM.IL &A l t fL00R 1%EGAFAL p O ~ p ~ ( ~ ., ~ ~ ~ a 1nE fI00R YEAU.AL 1 ~ ` ~ ' '" r ~ ti ~, ~T ~ w~ ~ ~ ~ i ffir F7N. fL 3&d ~ 1 ~ 1 ~` i ~ i ; I` - ~ ~ ~ _ ~i 333 3 ~ 1 i ~ i . ~ . zr' w a R ~. ` . ~.~ , o9 .w J O I I'~• M ,, ~ w SECRON B-8 ... ALLEN (P) MAGNOLIA ,['"RIVE ~ H C9'48'IS' ff ~ ,r 3I ~ ~ ~E Oe ~ x ~ ~~ ~ b ~! ~: ~ ~__ ~ ~ E~"aFIFt ~ E.,.en ---------'-~--- -_---d------ 3171" £ a~i .T3Ad0' _ _ ~{'.""`~ t r mr f ww L m . sc__v;_.~s I -----~--'--' i I ~~.. ~' E ~n5 ~ ~u °~'IY d i 5 1 ti '~~ See ~ si_. zi._.. 6 1 ` .,~ ' i " ~ ~ ' I~ N ~. T6. ss, e,., a i , ~ 98 SF. - °~ ~ ~ sss ' onra sue' 11 1 _ ... t 7r' w ~~~- 1 EN ;~ ~ m ~".~: ~ -~' ~ a 3io~ ~.. ,.. ~~. mAs scW==€ F~ ~@ laity uv ~Up~~® ~ . Y ~ - S ~~ ~~- tl0 ~~ A En~ ____ _~ y z€ w -e¢ Z 9 urns _c ~ ~~ nuW r~~vrnrr aavn ' ~ ~ ~LL w Eog ~ „F ~ L ~,+ rr~~ ear m v owr~ rs nc~ ~E si ~pK ~E ~,~~~ awsrm~risx~r NES cen<,.~ 0731 o.~..,~ B. v. Caked BE~: W.F.H. [wm ns K w p K m¢ wnw rw ~~~--~~~ ~~~~~~~ sov~a use rrm no wars s Issue 6ace; OBI71 N7 1f °s°rO°O~ Revisions: V ~ '~ - ~ a ~..,r.r p 111f Pa•C nr rar ~. ~ O !d r n ~~~ T-4~ v r s Jr-a~ r e i~r-At r e M11-fn ~ _y1 ~ NORTH Q n~ m ar ~wroE,m SCALE: 1"=20' a a n~ l J C~ L°5 V O W U C !~ w za 0 ~~ ~ ~o Q~ O =~ as oa °O-V .a.w~mr..w~. °"~~ ".~.... e. ^ jI 1-_: CI ~• G J d (/~ (n CO U~ i El ~-, a ~E P-- C N LL7 4~~ crr _~ f- _N N U d C D O Q Q O O r7 O d Q Q r- ~°~ ~ -____- I~ r~ rn at ~YpE 'C INLET DETAIL ~ ~~+~ r ~~~~ ~~ r=,~;~` ~~ ~~ ~~t~ t m,~ ri` ^ =~ ~ ~a,.~ ~~_~~ AT TI[ IIOV~IY Ilt ~ asr~ ~° ~° rya s s~arr A~~vo vrt ~~ ~~ ~- 4AB AT ~{IL~SIE / ./~~~r. //-~~r PmYE]IEM YRAN4110N OEfA0. i _-- .. ~ ~~ ppNN gg1rEE ..~ ~i~ PANgND ! DRNEMAY $CSlpi ~ 1f<~ a~ ~,. ~~ IINDENDRAIN DETAIL ]-t~_J Llp~ J ~'~ I f~~'-1 L~1 RfPASt CF PA401FNi CUSS s ~~ ~' / / _, _., .o r S ~~- ~~ih ~7°i~~ a~ DLIRB/IMAIIf OETA~. coka~IE wM1f DETAS a~EUy~DUT D~rruL CLSI~ ~a a~'fir~'~"`"" 1 ' ~~ NANOICAP PAIeO~M' 51I6Nn DETAL I ~->• I 1-V+~r m. I~ie ns~ r ~aa an..~ma IILON rf >, attlr~® IIP ~ I~Yf Irp~ p i ~t~ ~1 LILY 4a~~ a Y ~ ros Y inn ` ~B.F I.t F3 3157 • IOR A t~ v -.. ~~.~ le~i:.~r errr°mw HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL }1ANDICAPpm PAbEMENT SYMBDL ,~ ~c~' DETAIL o ~ ~ ms f~ ~xe 3's ~ C ,~' ~~ ~ c I ~~ a~ W ~~ s. i 4 gj NES Corm: 0]31 Orr..n e : B..V. CherL~d ey W.F.H. Issue Dale: UH/311~] Rev d ~° nno^ Vl! a ~, W U $Q O Ofl c [y~ H F O =U C~ga~ Nie ~~~ J I'j 1 I . 5 u wl Ij L G~•• ~_ CY1NiRDL SrpUC7UpE our a aPFrsc BAFFLE DE7A~ ~i ~~ 0 J d ~' C! 1 m Cn d l-~ N I -- G O C`J ~~ fj'1 G C N U c c 0 u} °' 0 a 0 O 0 0 F~ I ~. i (n U O a 0 4 ~; s ~_ ~__ N ~~ - TYPICAL VALVE SETTING _ ,. ..... ~.., ,.~r~..,r W ~n.. ~. .~~~ ~ ~ ~Y...ti...,~~ ...s w..~..r.... rw~ .-.mot. ~ , n.W ti f9r~P-fir MOt)1 ~:., °..w ~ ~ .e r ~ r-w.. rr.~arr r \ - r r-w+w } w ...r. *~n. : O ~ +'+. ai ti aye. ~ r ~ w i I e ~i r Yr ~ Cr~ tlSO1tlH4T10N TIP TERMINAL d.EANOVT DETAIL - ~~ TYPICAL FlRE HYURANi SETTING '-'~` ' ~ ~ .a ...- ~ ~-. r~ir- 7EIFOR4e7 9171011 YM.r.~ MO 9MHY AP r ~ ~ ~ Y Rr .~ rri~ aii ~~- YOYIyI ~Y ~ Mw ~ 1M I~~r~ ~r W `rrY. •Y OIN " a.s..SK~ T0P C01NfiT10M ~~ '~~~-~~ s. j ~~ .. `y": o"`..~ .~i..~+r r r n.. ~ w w..r.. ~ klO mMMG.'i1~N -~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~_~;~~~ P.V.C. PIPE RESTRAINT ~ _ DUCTILE IRON PIPE RESTRANT ~ ~ .- - ~ ..s4-..~.~~ ~I~#Z~e= ~.t=arrz~~ne- 3-:~s~ iS~sarsi: a_aam+r. ti.~ ~ ..:.JC.II" ~~~`" ~.~ .....rw S ~~~ Y .w.. ww~.~ ~ ~l Y1~V~LSi~.. t:.rzt~r a~~ s:a «•,~ J - f ~. .~...~~ E ~~' g5 r ~` e2 ~ ms yo~en~w 5 W a3 21 ~L~ ~a $o NES Cemn~ 0131 or.~.n8. B..V. CM1a~e06~: W.F.H. Issue ~ace~ oe17iN7 Rerisionr W r~ V Nf c' Q s Z< Q D ~ O ~o ~ ~ ~~ aLL c~ O F ~ '~ O Q 3 ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ A Q ~ ~.._ ~ ~~a_~ Ggo~ N C~ m 1 S ~c ~ ~; u ®4 f' ~ i~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~9~.~rE a n ~ `~ ~.w 5 9lil(.W ALWIl NES Cemn.: 0]31 Drawn en 6. ~'. cn.~s.a sr: W.F.H. Issue Dam: oar3iro] Aev t O x Z ~ o, ti C ~ O C a .o o~ N O R~~i SCALE:1"=20' o +o pp o ~Fw tt 8u a ~_ '-7 p0 Q ti o! QO O =~ ~Q o~ $u BUTLER ~ESiGN GROUP, INC n {~ oOtml NAtlI NtlY3El[Y. INC I I ~ o U ~nsx~~`raorvrn. mu t~ er mom v® m ww,x Bunn U L Cf] ~]_ N . NA&TAT MANAG£11ENT ANO IRRICATIpI Nn7E5 IcormNUml ? s I _ 1_~ Ll1Nn5GWINC PERYI74 M Iia9Jr mei v Ywi Y~i Lra n~irla~ ~ ^ m 1 Y lYY i 6/r YYYIYI a R A IMY! IYIYOYIf 110 YMI~MY IGYf L 10L~L T YCYYIrC YgIR YYL R IW OC/R[ b 01 efYL 1 a ] ? ~ ~. R~I{ Q1N ' m Ya1~ R R L ~IYI VI LY f11h1r1ANYL Ti[ Yea m /Ct11e[ ffi i lIY10a Mmt Ollrmal YM M fiR p lLYI11a °, - ~ ~ • 6611YI m416 v . ' u ^. Y Yl i Y NY LYI Ai AoO r rII1mYd 110 r OLImA ®WI! O M Mol® IiK iiM4OeO1 N/I1 Ya Y: m 1 YT1RPIp11 Y L WY[ N R mfY AY. H YYR Ir YI II iC m L 11 ¢ ~ n 1 e M YrQ Y1L Ori 0Ar d TP. eylY Q 11 l[ ! I r elEa A 1®M YiiL . l 1 • IMM ~ Q ~ CrOYrm grY P Yw ~ a IA 10 R f• YOA ~{~.~~~~~~~ ~Y 1Y1F 11M DLQ 9Y0 IY! R ~~~ ~ r Ya{ R111 Y Y11a AIY GOaY4i 1OIY, M }/~ 1MA R YIOl1O M CBI[ q illC.~Y 1! Yiv YIQ 2 ~ ~ [ C 6 ~ ~ o siK 11%1 ~ ~M Ni ~~ ~~ 7 YR I~ olf uM Y wol i b 111p~, ~111t~Y]OILL R 10 CYIQ lXQ • M1M CIA lleYar •.INm Ml YI 0K L MK Mlwl1 R YY YY CO. OR X1140 1111E p n ~ .yr ~`® J W~4OL^ aIW M f!. w a Yira>Zm a N711Y1[ M CYCYLM fOl YrY A rat LRM NOY rmml ~ $ y n a ! ifi TeflA. ~~ ~m rd m ~ A 01M011®O Y YYIYY1q M M M101 T M Y1Y1 R11 M11pL IIY m MRIYNI> ~ € -~ I.E'. ~® a s Afflaf9 M fOOT D11 a nfO 1 Yin.. at TR<_F PRO7EC710M AND PRFSERYA710N: M 0111[ M1Y1 YML m YMWI®A M ~1~q A ~WQmMxon07l/ Mba O t 1 ~ SV Ft IYIl1Y YRLppYi 11 a®1 wYl C ~ . Y am ~ IOOIOIL Y 1. to Ysm ~wsws Y1CL x saYO Nw M~ er m iR iielOrm `~s ~ ;~ rfioi m M Yn1a v nmec wramrc Yo ulme w minAa rwYS xY Yae1 d K M ~O° rlr Ar A1A 1 er w ~ r 11p4aM YYI rYrParai Yea Ynaa wu R Y w mn1Yi[ elfia rl wYt Ym Ym resale w1rY ass Q 1 m mo o1 ~ oemm em aY a ~ ~ >*Y ' Z s wL YP1al nm YC a IYWm lrbef7e rear AIL 1Aa~Y a CV1rm M 1OFfaisi 1111a LrwL ;,.:s ~ srawHG oErNr e,L' mi YL~Meaareo~erYrll ~rY~.pY~Y)is :,.. y'~. J YS EOML ieOYl 1 ~A' 1RIQ AOiim A YOM OlYrL Tr1 4O OYI® IAYI Y: YIYIIM A 11W eWl6 Y oO1'L R eME[ f1Wm 11N YmIU m Y: YYLN Y Yi! 1O IOYEYV Te M r 1® mOl V M OEllllf mMlldl s aISYY1x 1w1Yme rYr m rr mpJlmll o m LL T11Y M s1111Y11w11 IiRm ~ io~mrri ~ e ~wwz YOIAS aoow wnr M Yer o1r uY n nY am wo V+ M aar oR uY ar wAC® nm v R wvL YYnpL _ PLANTING AT PIAIfRNG AT li1MMlYMf_ _ 'off G A. YLI ~/1~pp1~ N61O1/1/[11q~! YYP Yf rfwnm YW ~ Ir+ $ - ~ O ~ Cl YIYL mLYpwaw~ M ~ Y1011 i0i DYES 1MYY/I[ MO Yif t llrf6 NOiN M YI1A11 NOY Y m W M ^ YY ypAY ~y~ ~CMMY~Wpt7/[ 111YIO 8 a~~ YAA1 YM A T Mi uaa v Yi® LTiI. ~' ~ 16L ® i . ' ~LY 1 °~ ~9F °m "r` i1Of i ~ N a mm ov m 1YL~ V ~ 0 ~~ ~ WO 1 1 O la a wem \ Y fLI YY! R Irk 1v L M I S R ~ p M 11 YY e 1C AYY1f 1 11 Y CO L Y Y I M 1 f L : 1 1I p1 NE D IM p~or [ ~ ~ T 1L t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. p 1 ~/~ 1 ~ p ~ L II E 1 a Y ~ M ~ Y ®LOitlli~iW M ~ I of Ie9Q YYYIEM ~ ES Cemm- 0]ll ® e..~J1 ~m YIr AIIrM jgM A , jppyl I~ ~fiY 111Y'!R lR p 11YI4 !OL FWR61Y Q 1Y~IL0 NOM MAY YimR Drn.n B Y Q w YY ~ ^^ ~YY trYwY rr a flQmim rtYY ABe1r tOf.• • M li R R m11M li YYIIA R @i11O11~ Yin" /ei M mam Ya1r O rfloreo u1mYi Mxked ey: W.F.H. iS! 11 Ye1YAA .YI gYI~mL`M~° R1~RDI .111110 u1mr ! fE rasaYO4p1 Tn wt 11ti 1m R4Y d laYYl WL Yrw r YmYr'Itic aa i re mwlm 11oLYSIp 1YM OiYiY os YnYI !"° ssve Date: oe13 i ro1 G 1 m ~irmrm a MC fO1 YRMUOrII rrY1~~i1 v a rya 1Yr~ ~~ 1 Ne Y1a lue ~ w gr ww lwln m m E eY1m Ym M sw mY o festal Ma 11Ya aar r aOW 14L comoY 1riR a1 Rer~s~ans: YOPY. YL n 1OYm1A IOYA /IO~ ]CR If WiCY YOY[ n>t I11LY W1r1WT<A ' rIf w i1i Y ONM WIAAiIin~ R Tt 1.11~V aM1 YINIf 1~I1 11 R 1C d It R X ~ Yi1tt11I11IYY IIO® ICS MWILOY{IY~mpoQ~~YfOlYLLTYp01iY~Of- IOei aMN a Am1s~Ye, ~ I~YC OoMI!!II Y M 1. M YLIL IIY v Tf i1Ye !L'YI YYYY firer PLAM PIT DETAlI \ 7AR R iYild M1Y[. OOi ~ Lrl r M Y® 1Y0 YJI YYa1 aim M - L ilrllla /rIYS IYYYgL L 10FIIrI1mYIQ 1rIL O L 1Ei1 EIILI IIIYO Ys YY! ~ Y1I11L IOI R® eYYnaMM1L YM IYYO m 11l Q mR~r. ~e ~ 9 YL ~ U R Y~• MR ~ q YRYR 1 Au 1A1m111eoYA w ~ a s+RUe PLANIMC oETULs wr'~V1 A°I°~ii Tv'~iN~aga • 1YY1Y a ~ ~ i f~ w 10Ym ~ (~ Q 1!~ TREE GUY WIRE PLANTING a ~~ ~~ ~~ Y11A a firm a Yr 1mC 1100 NY 11et ~ w 1' ~ 1•d i YM1O-Oi ` ~L y~ TnrY m~~Y f~,~1L 1M~C811YS ~ 1S YYf111Y q A 1LY01 s ~ 11O W OL Y: IYae W01 m OiWQ YOR /111IW IYFD M mYrCIA ~E N ~ ~ Y [ l~1 P Oql i ~ l1Q~ L l IYOI®R -L l1Y a YOIIUYYL ~/~ t;J(/ L m. Y1 ~/1~~ pW~ tp~ NY f~® MOO N 9t IvR A YIYI L[ Yi/01 1W Rp ~ W O P r Y!E 1 YRmrY YE1R R R19 l yl~p~Y~1~fp~ w.Y~io/~M I~ MLL~ MAm NOM T6 TYRrwY /_1 V C IRPoGA710N NO1E5 A YCOT tll!•L LY1 i ~ ~ ~ L L a TREE BARRICADE DETAILS Y r 1oYYNA aoY1 k YIWL• Yi1L YYI Ywa Y1 YOq R YIDMR! 1oY0°m111i°r>vo1 ~ :~e°a'a1i1n'1aRr°R°O1m s°tl+`m m ~ i Nr11ar ~YYY 11® fa YR ^41f ~ m""~ R f Y~ 1Ye ,~i I n 1~! o i~ i a ~, ,Y .~, ~ Ar ~ ~ E1iga°n~1L rl~iArAQ mr a mot- MrYMY°s v ~ 1Ywor w Y m Y~ix TRiY aiwa v 1 an ~ Y i11alAYia "1[~ ~+ ~a ,..1 Ar w1 Anu. twm Yvac n '~sl('" YO[ /Mm YYO Y OOii im11 w Ii1S0 {Or 1OYY Yi YOI r r~ vise Y1~ne m1ewYOi°r nRr. i a - s'ioi sNa s Ymli IOlN Wt /Ir Y' R1® YO M E11YC YlY1Q R 111YOi YLL A m1AER RiWI Mlmd YYI ,s~ ~-J '~i ~~ Ay vAT @~ AI UGeil Y11 iYil YDmYL ~ lr,Y:OM IRd pl YYIY Y1 le IIOIYi YlI Y- ~ _ ~ M 1Q aYOIOaAYO wONIA11MaRa T epm ~ ~ A7 Mi01 ML ICeR eO~ IYI 101® diY~ ~ 111 NOY a I O YY YY Ce1OY AR YI MP 1oi NYIOam }- - I-I1M MIK ~ ~ i ~ 0 ~1 II.Y11n rw IOTA O ~? ~ I r ~ nN.Y1 r i MN Ear OYWY INOOIf All YOI r TM Yi R oAY m a Yr~ Ysiw mrL t1rY 1s Yea m ~1f1 eE1®R Yq M YR O16ClIili O AYOP A w.M MYA~ U` '^'U SVI ~~ - * I - Trr Yir YreIM1L ~~~ Ma a, r rrYiL ,wr YY Ms r tY a: 111111A11® M1Oila1 Na a 1pY T1N Q f1 A Yea ..ffT a .L `s ~ ~,°. ° ~ ®[ ~ ~ r1 Z Q ~ ~ ~ K f _ ~ iii m 11er wYY u11 M Ywrr 1 ~ S O a - sv m N IIDZA ~ ~iwl~w 1wY°waila m Idr r1Yr aF ai wrna 11Oa ~ c O Gi _ __ V rr e ~ ~ ~ ~ M 6s YnaYYYm ~a~1!~NY v ' ` (~ a K Oa ~AtF A1 p_____... V wr~rvilY~ To ma ' ~ ` ~ 1Yi~ f~ YY~~ w rlwmailA iwr v •~-••--• O ~ ~~~`Y' 7AY a Ia ~Y y p ~ a ~ m ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ J r~• 1 6 YIOIMIL A1LT GtirlGm. Yra11r 1! t 1 OYIW ~ ~ L If110r0 Yr10O1 011YY Ya t mYrot YY rO i O NA ~ m i ROa 1118 OR M 1 R fa® YMfi Yrle a ~MfRMY~R~~ YYIIf IIRI ~p ~ D > j {~ ' C ' "' LD ~ AT M DE ~fTAIL M1iai1 ARRIC T EE S ~ 1 Yr111i 1YY 11Y a10a Yila ®"~ ~ 1v YAm~~i'R°ilroi°iAn1Y°i a mcYYm Q y ' w R B A C o .,. rJ' r~ ° _v -~ SHRUB PLAN'fiNG SUTLER DESIGN GRDUP INC ~ 2 r _ , ~ n .m.1sa _ cans RAIN N a~~AR~ R , uRSfkM, INC. ~ 0. 6rtA n GG~~ ~ ( ` LS ^C5 w Yra 11Y 1 urerni m a. Mm a YIRO O U u. L~ n ~~: I z ~- n w w (n 0 c 0 G 0 z° ? ~ ~ ~~1 ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~~ . p ~ ~ , €~ '~ C I IIII ~ v~ Id f1O0R Xfl C O .= ~:• ~ i Lrd fiOOR Y! `~ ~ $ : ~- ~ ~ 1 ~ o I 3 9 ".. ~'i 2r~ ww ~ ~`` Ta E 1 ~ \ ~ _ i ~~ ti ti~ .g~ ALL WORK INSIDE THE TREE BARRIGQES, GNOPY DRIP L1NE3, TREE CANOPY SNALL BE SwERVISER'tMPLEMEx1EO BY AN ISA CERTIFIER ARRORIST. PROTECTIOW PRESERVATION NOTES AIYJ RET0.ILSARE ON SHEtiTLt.S ALLEN (P) ~ir,~r,nrnr.r,l nurvF ss ~ o"; ~~ _m f ~ ~ s ~' zs ~ ~a 8' i/ ~. ~~ ~~w a ,-;a ~V ~. ED ie o; gU r+ES Co~.v 0731 CEacLed By W.F.H. Issue Dale: 09131!07 Rev ~ U a N ~ o q ~ aC2' ~nfj ~ ~ n Z ~ O° NORTH a O ~o SCALE:1"~2D' ~ ~ ~~ h- a a pp a a , "~ ~u BUTLER DESIGN GROUP, INC OOLDEX AAIX NURSERY. RiC. ~~ 6V ~ ~r~+ .c~ ~.r. rv~~, rL an~C~Jj elnrl m 11x1 ~a1m a® ~n a~ vlTq ~x~i rae-ravnw pow Q G v ~~bn~o ~o u~o 1N3~41dFlydgQ JNIlVM~ld 1~OZ S ~ 1~© ®~n~~~9~ yr .. rc L i 4 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 ~, W ~ ~~ O~ ~ Zti © zo ~u ~ sECOrn ~.ooA ~ ~~r . ,,-0. ~,~-~ ~~~ -I >~ - ,• iCP~ ,_ , _ TOP U PNWE1 lU U IOU OFLI ~ 'scmrm noon ~~ ~~ ~, F,uon ,•- TW or TtIKN ,•_„• ti lU~ • .~ H'-0' TU U IOU qG ~ lU U ALOF OOG n A E6'-0' ,v YLRO FLOdi f-191 fL00i ~~ ~ Q °' w~ ~' V ~~ a C3 ~ T--r a~ p `®~ p~ ~, V+ U V' ~ ~ O ~U ..,~~-~ b `~ ~ a .KEY PLAN 2 WEST ELEVATION ,~-. ~-0~ rtTS a SOUTH ELEVAT30N ~,~. ~'~ 1 NORTH ELEVATION .n• - ~•~ 3 EAST ELEVATION Ve' - f-o' Tree inventory ~ ~00~ Sorath Fort l-garrison Avenzre Prepared by: Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist March 30, 2005 I.S.A. Certified Arborist #1500305 ~~ The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry and includes findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and this report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property ofFuluicco Divello and will riot be given to other entities unless so directed. bite Ovet-vievv and Cauopy Analysis The subject property includes a former commercial building and a sr.ngle family. residential house. Historically, the property has been cleared of all native vegetation and even the larger native trees are second growth. The tree canopy is composed primarily of the native live oak (Qusrcus virginiatra) and laurel oak (Quercus lazrri,~olia) trees. Palm species. including the native sabaI palm (Sabel palmetto) are also present. In addition, the site contains an admixture of exotic trees that were planted by the previous occupalrts or invasive species such as the camphor tree (Cinnamamum camphora) that grew from seed. The mid-story vegetation is comprised of planted ornamental shrubs and various grasses make up the groundcover vegetation, The overall condition of the trees is below averalre as the site trees reflect neglect and improper maintenance. However, a small percentage of the trees warrant preservation and they have been identified in the inventory. In addition, several trees are 'border line .for preservation and will be upgraded if remedial maii~,tenance is performed. Tree inventory Data ~ ' ~ a a ~" a ~ A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's conditioir at the time of inspection. Tt is a ~ ~ ~ o ~ valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could o ~ ~- z o lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four o codes and also has a comment section The following is an explanation of the inventory a data: Tree# -location - l/aclz tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size -Tree size is a measure of l:he tree's trEU~k diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If a fork exists in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. Palm species are measured by feet of clear tn2nk. Clear trunk (shown as C.T.) is measured from the grade to the base of the bz1d. 1V0`T'E: Tf the crown spread is required to be shown on a plan use the following formula: The cream spread is equal to 1' radius for each inch of trunk diameter. It is better to use this formula than the actual location of the branch spread. as a tree will develop roots in the opposite direction of a lean or one-sided crown. The crown spread for palms is 6' radius from the tnznlt. Species ~ Each tree is listed by its coznrrlon and botanical name the first. time .it is listed in the inventory, For simplicity the tree is listed by, its common name thereafter. Conditiozz Rating -The condition raking is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. dements of strzzetzzre include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc,, 2) branch arrangements and attachments, i, e,, well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs, included bark. ~leazen#s of systemic lzeaith relate to the tree's overall enez~gy system measured by net photosynthesis (food made) ys. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health will have a vascular system that moves water, nutz~ients and photosynthate around the tree as needed. In.dacators of a healthy systemic system used in the overali,~condition rating include; 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) Brawn density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth {shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is malting and storing energy. The overall condition rating also takes into consideration. the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 bung a dead tree and b a specimen. Increments of 0:5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree ratiz7g system are as follows: 0- A dead tree 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, llazardo~zs, harboring a communicable disease or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category ##1 ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinzrs ter.ebinthifollirs), Atree with a rating of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a. threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2 --- A tree exhibiting serious stt~uctural def.'ects such as codominant sterns with inehided,~, bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback-:'~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ craclted/split scaffold branches etc: In addition, a tree with health issues such as I~:4u 3~ ° energy, low live crown ratio, ,serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficien~~~~s ~ ~ ~ o or soil pI~ problems.. A free wit11 a raking of #~2 should be removed Lrnless the proble'~rs) ~ ~ ~ LL can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considakable ~ ~-, ~ ~ u ~~ amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating. a ~ 3- A tree with average structure and systerriic health and with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a cadominant stem not in the basal area that will be subordinated ox cabled and braced or a codaminant stun that will soon have included barb can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good si'nicture and systemic health with minor problems that can lee easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age, A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the properly and should be preserved. 5 ~- A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect ar disease problems or nutritional deftciencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5.rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation. 6 - A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, farm (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and rmiqueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen. tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree, In addition, a specimen tree should have an undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an experienced and competent International Society. of Arboriculture (T.S.A_) Certified Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree. Comments. The comment section serves to Hate observations relative to the tree but not covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data: ~t may include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have recommendation's on whether to rerriove or preserve a tree. NOTE: A tree inventar~y is typically valid for 3-5 years. 1!~[nwever, events such as ~, drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance arrd o `~ gev'ere sta~•ms cau downgrade the rating vallze of a tree. Conversely, remedial ~ ~ "' maii3tenauce can upgz'acte the value. ~f you suspect ti~at a tree lies been adversely c~ W ~ ~; affected have the tree inspected by a qualified Tntornatioi~al Society of o ~ f- ~ ` Arboriculture (:CSA) Cer•.titied Arborist. o c d ******** At the time of dais inventory several trees u%ere in atotal or semi- deciduous state. It is difficult to assess the live crown ratio and overall systemic health of a tree when the foliage is not present, However, most of the oaks are now producing catkins (flowers} consequently the density of flowers and/or leaf buds were used to calculate systemic issues. **:~**~`*'~*****~: ., Tree Inventory Tree # Size Species Xtating 1 10" laurel oalC (Quercus laur falra) ~,$ Comments; This tree was not identified on the tree survey but has been~added. The tree is graining in a planter and is located 3' from tlae rear wall af.the commercial building fronting Sotrth Fort Haiiison Avenue. The root collar and trunk are free of decay or ' cavities, The tree has three codozxzinant stems located approximately 9' above grade~that have severely included. bark and that support most of t:he tree's canopy. The tree has average live crown ratio and below average form. Tlae codorninant stems could be rr~.itigated by stzbardinate pnuaing l~tit this procedure would be costly and take at least three years before structure was restored. Recaznrnend rerriaval of this tree. ~ `I" deciduous 2.S *Note; The crown ofthis tree was totally bare at the time of the inventory and the branches arc growing over the roof so an identification of species based on mozphological elements was loot possible. The species will be provided as soon as foliage appears. . Comments: This tree was not identified on the tree survey. The tree is growing in the same xaised planter as free #l. It is located 5' south of tree #1 and 3' from the rear building wall. The trunk is situated against ilae edge of the planter. This tree has a tight v- shaped crown that is composed of two scaffold. branches. The tree has average form and structure and good live crown ratio. Recommend removal. 1 3 $" live oa1C (Quercus virginian~z) 2.0 Comments: This tree is not identified on the survey, The tree is growing 5' fi~arn the rear ~ of floe commercial building. Th.e crown of this tree is composed of three scaffold branches that are codominarrt with included bark present in the cratch.es. The overall -form ~ o ~ azad stn2ctti~re is poor. The tree leas abQVe average live cro~u~a ratio and zs systemically c~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ healthy, Recommend removal. o ~ ~ z ~ Q ~~ 4 8" laurel oalc ~ Comments: This tree is sitti3ated 1' from. a shed located i.n~,the rear cif the colramercial building. This tree has below average form with average struch~re and live crown ratio. It has b surface roots which is unusual for a srr~all free (surface roots grow an top of the grade and can be attributed to site conditions or genetic characteristics). As this tree grows the s~.rrface roots will increase in size and cause problems to structures and create a trip hazard. Recommend removal. 5 22" laurel. oalc 0.~ Comments: This tree is not shown on the site plan and.. is actually growing in the right of way of S. Fort Harrison Avenue where it grows through an awning attached to the Did produce stand. This tree is severaily~declinipg. Tt has basal wounds, hunk cankers, intemal decay and a dysfunctional systemic system. Tt is in imminent danger of falling anal should be reproved immediately. Contact the City of Clearwater's Urban Forestry Iaivision (562-X1950) as they are responsible for right of way trees. . N~T.1/: There is a palm growing in the right of way and. also some on the property that were not inventoried because they had less than 10' of clear trunk and are not considered protected trees by City of Clearwater code. All polyps having clear trunks greater than 10' will be inventoried. 6 3~" laurel oalc 0.5 Comments: This tree has massive internal decay indicated by the presence, of heart rot sporophores colonized all over the trunk. The root collar and large root flares are suffering from. decay as a result of previous physical wounds. There is a large area of decay in the form of decaying stubs 6' above grade. This tree has no ripper crown structure as the only foliage is resulting from vigorous suckers growing from the decaying scaffold branches, This tree is hazardous and needs to be removed. 7 30" live Daly 3.5 Comments: This tree was in full flower (catkins) at the tune of inspection anal appears to have above average live crown ratio based on the amount of catkins. The trunk and root collar are healthy and free of any debilitat7ng problems. This tree has t~vo major scaffold branches that form the crown. They are cadominant but have a wide u-shaped crotch with connective tissde present. There is an 8" dead stub that needs to be removed if the tree .is preserved. The tree has good farm with interesting serpentine branches. The crown is somewhat irregular in appearance but still has above average aesthetic qualities. This tree will benefit from pruning to remove stubs and. small deadwood in the crown. If preserved and maintained properly this tree will evolve into a very goad tree. TZecommepd preservation. 34" live Dolt 3,0 ~ ~- ~o ~ ~ ~~ o~ (~I ~ ~~ ~ U ~ d ~ O ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ Comments: Tl~.is tree has a 4" diameter girdling root that wraps around appro.~ximately 30% of the tree's rant collar. This root will injure the tree but has not caused damage yet and could easily be removed. The trunk is sound. The crown is composed of ttivo s ff ]d ca o branches that are codominant. The crotch has a tight u-shape that has connective tissue at this time but could become included in the future. The upper crown has above average overfill structure. Part of the crown. grows to the west over the rear parking lot of the commercial building and has some'daYnage in the form of torn branches and branch wounds likely caused from large trucks that drove beneath this tree. This portion of the crown will Head to be raised if the tree is preserved. The crown of this tree is barely average in appearance. The form is irregular and there are gaps in the canopy and it has very Iittle crown to the east. I-towever, the tree is systemically healthy and could evolve into a good tree if preserved and maintained properly, The main cratcl~ should be cabled and braced as it is cadominant with a tight crotch that will became included. As live oaks are long-lived trees that adapt well to constn.tction, this tree could be preserved if it falls . into a green area. >=Iowever, it does not warrant site design modifications for preservation. 9 2~" laurel oak 1.5 Corxunents: The trunk has a l2" x 12" area of decay on the lower east side close to the base. The decay is not causing stntctural problems at this time but will progress and cause problems to the root collar area in the future. This tree has an 12" and an 18" diameter codaminant trunk that forms the base structure far the crown. The codominant is severally included and there is a large bulge on the west side of the inclusion. indicating internal cracks/wounding. The upper crown has poor structure with sn7a11 cavities, decay sporophores, suckers and large dead wood. The crown ha.s low live crown ratio. This tree is not salvageable and needs to be removed. 10 9" 5chefflera(Brassaiarrctinophylla) 1,0 Comments: This tree was not shown on the site plan. 1_t is growing 2' from the chimney located on the west side of the old. house. The tree is not recommended far preservation as the schefflera is very cold sensitive and produces a large surface root system.. 11 16" laurel oa.lc 1.0 Comment: This tree was attached by connective. tissue at the root collar to a 24" diameter laurel oak that is now a b' dead. stump infected with Hypoxylon canker. The decay fTOn~ the stump will affect this tree's root collar area as the decay progresses into the basal area. There is also a ctuee~l palm that is growing against the tnrnk .of the laurel oak. The tree has an old flush cut wound on the northwest side of the trunk that is causing internal decay. The tree leas virtually no upper crown and stn~cture is non-existent. This tree needs to be removed, 12 l0' C.T. queen palm (S'yagr2ts rontanzoffrana) ?.0 ~ ~ r-- ~6~ o ~~ ° u`~ ~~ ~~ 4~ ~ ~' ~p ~ u ~. Cornrnents. This palm has below average crown aid appearance for a queen palm. The base is grow, ing against tree ##11 and this condition will prevent the palm from being able to be transplanted. Recommend removal. 13 i 5" live oal~ 3.0 Comments: This tree is growing against~i:he concrete wa11 of the front porch of the old house, In addition, it liar an avocado tree growing against its trunlc. The root flare is healthy but is somewhat asymmetrical where the avocado tree interferes with its growth. The txurrk is sound and forks 8' above grade into three scaffold branches that form the upper crown. The tree has goad upper crown, stntcture with average overall form. The live crown ratio is above average, The appearance is only average but will improve if maintained properly and given room to brow. It is a borderline tree in regards to desirability for preservation. and should only be preserved if it falls into a green space. ~4 6" avocado (Pe~•.sea.~lmerica~a) 1,Q Camrnents: This tree has poor form and stn~cture and is an itr~desirable species dtte to its cold sensitivity, Recommend removal, 15 20" laurel oak 0.5 Comments: The trttnlc of tree # 1 b grows at an angle into the basal area of this tree. If they continue to grow in this manner they will wound each other and cause structural problems at the critical rao~t collar area. Tltis tree has a very poor upper crown structure. One leader is dead with sporopltores growing along the branches. The other two branches hive been. previously topped and are dying. l~.ecommend removal of this hazardous tree. 16 12" live .oak 1.0 Comment: This free grows at angle pt~t from the base of txee # 15. The tree leas poor structure as it has virtually no crown. One branch grows on top of tree #13 causing damage to a lateral brariclx. This tree will be damaged when tree # 15 is removed. Recommend rernaval. 17 30" live oalt: 2.0 Comments: Tlus tree is growing east of the old house and abuts the east side of the driveway. The root collar and lower trunk are sound. At X1,5' above there is a galvanized ~ ~ ~ steel cable embedded into the trunk all the way around the trunk and again about a third of the way around and six inches higher on the trunk. The cable is totally embedded ~, W ~° `~ ~~ except for one area where the cable tip protrudes from the trunk. The girdling has caused ~ ~ ~--+ ~ v the trunk to grow callus tissue around the wound resulting in a pronounced bulging of th.e o ~ ~ z a think tissues. I estimate that the girdling occurred approximately 20 years ago. Just above ° ~ ~ the girdled area the tree forks into two 1 S" dianiefer codominant stems that have an 8" bank inclusion. The upper crown has good structure and appearance, however, there is approximately 2S% diebaclc probably dzie to the girdling activity that destroyed part of the tree's vascular system. The tree has apparently restored most of its vascular system as evidenced by its growth, A major concern for this tree however relates to the location of the decay resulting from the girdling, It is located just beneath the bark inclusion anal the chance of coalescing decay creating a structuual hazard is probable, This tree has an overall attractive appearance but gi,~ing,th.e potential, for structural failure it is recommended for removal, The only alternative is to place rods in the crotch and cables in the upper crown to secure this tree. However, the procedure is expensive anal impractical for a tree with the above described damage. 18 . 23", 29" live oak ~ 3.S Comments: This tree was not shown on t11e site plan. This tree has a galvanized one quarter inch steel cable going Ixorizontally through the 29" diameter trunk but it is not girdling flee tree and is not causing a strcuctural problem. This tree splits into two trw7ks 3' above grade. The trunks forn.i a u-shaped crotch with cozrziective tissue present and do not appear to have a structura.I weakness. The 23" diameter trunk grows to the north and develops an average crown in form and above average in regards to live crown ratio and stnzcture. This side of the tree is somewhat restricted due to competition from an adjacent tree to the west. The 29" trunk forks 6.S' above grade and develops a crown above and to the east, west and sozrth. The overall crown of this trunk has a.bave average form with good live crown ratio, Tlie fork bas a slight >r~clusian that should be cabled and braced to ensure stability, The tree needs pruning to rer~-zove small deadwood and stubs, This is a good overall tree but should be cabled azid braced in the southern trunk fork and have a rod installed between the two tnznks for extra protection, if this work is performed the tree would be upgraded to a 4.0. Recommend presezvation. 1.9 2S" Laurel oak 0.5 Continents: This tree has a wound an i:he south side of the tnznk that staz`ts 6" above grade and goes 3' high up the trunk eausin~ internal decay. The tree forms a codom.inant 8' above grade, The trunk on the west side is completely dead with sporophores growing along the trunk. The trwxlc on tl~e east side is dead at. the top and orzIy has, sucker growth. This tree is hazardous and needs to be removed. 20 12' C.T. queen palri 2.s Comments: This palm is not shown on the plan. The palm has a below average crown and has been affected by competition froze adjacent treas. Transplanting on site is not recommended fnr this palm as it would be more cast effective to plant a new palm. Recommend removal. 21 7" laurel oak 2.0 Comments: This tree has a good tnznlc that forks S' above grade arzd farms a narrow vase shaped crown, The fork produces a codozrtiziant situation that will become included in the ~~ ~. °' ®~ a ~ .--i ~ ~ a = ~ ~, Iutu.re. The live crown ratio is good but this tree has very poor form due to overhead branches and is not recommended for preservation, 22 . 3", 3>, 3„? 2" 2" schefflera 1.5 CotYUx~ents: This tree is not shown on the survey but is a protected tree by definition of size for a cluster tree in the City o~ Clearwater code. The cluster has average aesthetic appeal but is not recommended for preservation as it is an undesirable specie. 23 lQ' C.T. cabal palm (Sabel p~rl~netto) 5.0 Comment: This is an exceptional palm that would. be a specimen i.f it was taller. This palm has a near perfect tnmk and crown. Tl~e boots (frond stabs} remain from. top to bottom but they serve to protect the tn~nk and can be pruned off to have a clean trunk. Recommend preservation or transplanting an site., 24 40' iauz'el oalc 1.0 Comments: This tree is growing 1' from the sidewalk. along Magnolia Drive. The sidewalk has been jogged to save this tree, The tree is also growing just east of. a power pole into an area labeled vacated easelrient on the site plan. This tree has four codominant trunks that form the crown. The east codominant tna.nl~s are severely included. The north and west side trunk attaclunents are not included but have weak attachments. The root collar on the north side ofthe trunk has had two flare roots severed and decay is present in the affected Iaasal area. There is also a large trunk canker (sunken tissue) on the north side. A large scaffold branch growing to the southwest that is dead is cracked and ready to fail. The tree has cavities on the scaffold branches on the east side that are affecting the tree's stability. The upper crown structure is very pair as the crown has large deadwood, old stubs and. mayor dieba.ck. This tFee is hazardous and needs to be removed as soon as possible. 25 1d' C.T. cabal palrri 3.5 Comments: This palm is growing I S' due south of tree #2~ and is also located in the vacated easement. This palm is healthy and has a good crown. The condition has been downgraded slightly because the crown has been impacted by branches from tree #~24 that have affected the symmetry of the crown. This palm will evolve into an attractive palm. Recon~nend preservation or transplanting on site. . ~. 1Vote; There is a small fzve stem cluster Senegal date palm (Plzoenzx reclinata) located ~ ~ a `~ ~ just east of tree #25 that is not large enough to be protected by City code so it ~is not ~ ~ ~~ ~, inventoried. However, it has value and can be preserved in place or moved on site. o ~ ~-- z o U ~ 26 5" Citrus ~.5 ° ~ u Colnix~ents: This tree is 90% dead. Recommend rerzioval. ~~ 9" laurel oak 2.a Comments: This tree is growing beneath the crown of adjacent trees and has very poor overall form. The crown is mostly one-sided grooving toward t1,e northeast and the live crown ratio is,average, The strL~cture downgrades the overall condition rating as the inai.n fork is a codominant stem with Included bade, The inclusion will worsen over time and could lead to structural failure in the main crotch. If this tree had a balanced crown the codominant situation could be corrected through s~zbordinate pruning, however, it is not practical for this tree, Recommend removal. 28 5" laurel oak 1.5 Comments; This tree was not shown on the survey but is inventoried as it is a~proteeted t7~ee according to City Code, This tree is growing 1' from the base of tree#29. This tree has virtually no crown as it is suppressed by tree,#29, Th.e canopy is small and grows to the east. The tree has poor structure and essentially no aesthetic value. Recommend removal. ~~ ld" ia~.irel Dolt 3,0 Comments: The trunk and root flare are structurally sound but this k-ee has a girdling root on the south, side that has caused very minor damage to the root flare. The girdling root can be removed, This tree has goad overall structure and above average live crown. ratio, This tree is a heahhy and structurally sound tree with the only downgrading factor being the form. The tree has very little crown to the south due to competition. fiom tree #30, a large Ilve oak tree, This tree could be preserved or removed to reduce the competition. to the more desirable live oak tree (#30). . 30 33" live oak 4.0 Comments: _ I'he trunk of this tree is sound and forks into two large codorrrinant sterns 6' above grade. The crotch of the fork is sli htl i h d g y p nc e on one side and will become included in the future. The crown spreads to the north and t b eas ttfi is sorr~ewhat restricted d.ue to competition on the north az~d south. The crown is slightly thinning on the west side but overall has very good live cro i wn rat o. This tree is a good tree overall and the crown will develop symmetry if the adjace t t n rees are removed. Potentially this could be the best tree on the site, In the future the main crotch sho ld b u e cabled and braced if the bark becomes included. This free is worthy of moderate site plan. modifications for ~ ~ . preservation. If this tree is preserved the site design should allow an undisturbed ro ti ° ~ ~ o ng area equal to three fourths the tree's dripline. Paved surfaces can count towards undist~irbed rooting area if the d a ~ ~ `~' ~ ~ ~ r9 pave surface is built an grade and aerated. oa 31 Z '~ S live oak ~, ~ =~ 2,5 Comments: This tree has a sound fi-urtlc and root flare aid the upper crown structure is average, The south side has a few sucker branches that grow upward forming a mass of foliage. These'branches should be removed as they will not form a canopy and. are not attached with a branch collar. There is an li" d.iam.eter lateral branch that grows to the northeast that has a badly decayed area and this branch should be removed. O'here is a 6" diameter branch that has suffered storm damage and needs to be removed. In addition, the tree has a large dead stub and minor deadwood that needs removal. The overall form is poor as the crown is mostly one-sided and lacks aesthetic appeal. The tree is systemically healthy with above average stn~ctlare and could be preserved if it falls into a green area. 32 ~'~" ]aurel oalc ~ O.S Comments: Tliis tree is very old with large trunk flutes and cankers sunken tissue areas). The trunk has sporophores present indicating intental decay and there are many old stub cuts on the trunk. The tree has two very large codominant trunks about 25" in diameter that have a.pocket cavity in the crotch. The tipper canopy has seven scaffold branches that form the crown and each one is broken at the top with. major dieback and deadwood present. Tlie only growth is from suckers. This tree has poor stn2cture, forn~. and live crown ratio and is a hazard. I~ecoinmend removal. 33 >10 C.T. Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata) X1.5 Comments: This palm is not shown on the site plan but is a protected palm as it has sterns with over 10' of clear trunk, Tlvs palm actually has 5 stems with over 10' of clear trunk. In addition, it has several other stems of various sizes- The palm cluster has not been ' pruned for a very long time and presents a wholly appearance, However; the palm cluster is healthy. and once pruned would be extremely valuable. This palm cluster should be pnzned and preserved in place or moved on site, A second alternative would be to contact a palm broker about buying flits cluster. 3~ 22" laurel oak 2.0. Comments: This tree has minor basal decay on the southeastern side that should not debilitate the tree's sirtzctural integrity. The maj or downgrading factor of this tree is two severely included codominant scaffold branches forking 5' above grade. The bark is deeply included and the condition will predispose the crotch to fail. The scaffold branches support a vase shaped crown with below average live crown ratio, structure and form. The crown is restricted and grows to the north and south. The upper crown is in decline indicated by t7p dieback. Recommend removal, 35 3'2" live oak ~.p ~ o c Coznznents: This tree is growing 6' from a retaining wall for a retention pond located just o south of the south property Iine. The tree suffered root loss when the grade was cut fox the retention pond as reflected by branch dieback in the upper crown. The trunk and root flare are sound, The tnrnk forks into an ecluaI codominant stem 5' above grade au.~ the ~ ~~ N ~ ~~ `_..~ ~° U ~. =~ z ~ a U crotch is u-shaped with connective tissue present. The west codo~nina.nt has a d" diameter cavity from a previous stub cut that is caiFSing minor decay. The farm and associated aesthetic appeal is low and the crown has a heavy vine infestation, The live crown ratio is above average on the south side but Iow elsewhere in the canopy. This tree is not recommended for preservation. I-lowever, if it falls into a green space buffer it could be preserved brit will require remedial rnaintenance to improve the stnreture. In addition, it should be inspected every two years for~~e presence of included bark and the need for cabling and bracing, 3b ~" camphor (Cinn~rmomum carnphora) p.5 Can~ments: This tree is not shown on the site plan but is protected per City code. This tree is actually a cluster of sucl~er stems (one was 4" diameter at 4.5' above g7°ade) growing from an old stump. The tree has no structure or farril. Recommend removal. 37 l0 C.T. Senegal date palm - 3.0 Comments: This palm cluster was not shown on the plan brit has t-wo stems with over 10' afclear trunk and, several others stems of various sizes. This cluster has not been pn~ned in a very long time and if cleaned up could be preserved in~place or transplanted on site, 3B i0" citrus (calainondin) ~,0 Comments: Tliis.citrus has a basal decay caused by a fi~ngus that is progressively deadly. The fungus destroys vascular tissue which is reflected by diebaclc in this tree's crown.. Recommend removal, ~~ $" citrus (grapefnlit) 1.5 Comments: Tl~s tree has major dieback irz the crown and is declining, Recarrunend removal. 9~0 12" citrus (calalnondin) ~.0 Comments: This cttnis is in poor condition and is not recommended for preservation. 43 10 C.T. Senegal date palm 4.p Comments: This palm has four trunks that have at least 10' of clear trunk. This cluster a ~,, a ~ 'has oat been pnined in a: long time but vvauld be valuable if cleaned up. This palm clust~~ ,~ is located 3' from the west wall of the house and nay not be able to be successfully ~? U ~' c~ transplanted. As this palm cluster is valuable, preservation is recommended in place. ~ ° ~ ~ ~ I~Towever, if the palm does not fall. iota a green area, a palm moving company cortld be ~ ~ ~ contacted. to determine if transplanting is feasible. Recommend preservation. `lZ 2B" live oal~ 3 0 Comments: The root flare and tn~nlc are sound. The lower and upper crown has good structure. The live crown ratio is above average. Tl~e form is below average as the crown is irregular and branching is minimal with foliage often tufted at the ends. The tree is systemically Healthy and 11as good structuue and will improve with remedial pruning. Preservation is not recommended unless the tree falls into a green area, d3 21" laurel oak Q.S _. rS' g t3'--- - -- ~ - _ omments:~ Thls~tree -has a ve lar "e~cavi on the southeast side of the trunk that is causing major structtual problems. The tree lxas very poor upper crown stntctttre with codominant stems with included bark in the crown. The live crown ratio is below average and the foi7n is very poor. This tree is a hazard tree and should be removed. ~l4 3 8" laurel oalc 0. ~ Comments: This tree has an open cavity on the south side 6" above grade that xevea(s a hollow trunk. This tree is ver~~ l~azardnirs and needs to be removed as soon as passible. 45 1 S" camphor 2.0 Comments: Tlus tree has a straight trunk but very poor upper crown form and structure. The crown resembles a stalls of celery, The live crown ratio is average. THe carnpHor tree is identified as a category ane ecological pest plant by tlae State of la lorida Pest Plant Council. Recommend removal. 46 18" live oalc 2.0 Comnl~nts: This tree has a good trunk that divides into three scaffold branches that support a crown. witH very poor form. The majority of the tree's crown grows to the southwest. The tree offers very little aesthetic appeal. The live crown ratio and upper crown stn~cture is average. The downgrading factor of this tree is its appearance. Recommend removal. 4'7 24" ~ camphor ~ 0.5 ~~ Commerts: This~tree is covered top to bottom with vines, The tree has essentially no o ~ a crown stYUCture or form, Tl~e tree consists of a trunk with only a few lateral branches that ~ a "' ~ a ia~ w ~: have foliage tnfited at the ends, THe live crown ratio, stnrcture and form are e~t:remely ~ ~ ` P+ z ~- poor. Recommend removal. o ~ ~ Z . a E .. ~. a AIJG-~~-20fl7 1~; y~A ~R'©P1: CI_WT!' 'RP PRUNTiJ l2 ~ •-56~-4461 ~`:9g46o036 CReerwab~r Fire ~ itetoue P 810 ~rRn64in Otreet - C!e@~IVVt9#9r, P!ul~d® 33758 u ~ Publlc Wor{tm Ac6m1n#etrotlal~- Ertg#neerin~ fOApArEllnenlt u ~ r ~ , tOD S. My+Rle Avenue, suiR~ 200 - Cieerwrater, !:'tarWe 33788 .... ..,G"•~ ..:.Y~.iNr•i4,.f.,..,..`•.,, d,(r 1~'1 ,~.!.•:!~ .,. ~.•d r. .'r:~: ' , "i;,.l :; 4~ .I~~~~t~' .. ,., . ... .r. .. ,, '' ~ .. 'nib +uorYrrh+•! ~. nQis!nd m dt ow~rnlsbd~to and oppmvw by lhi AuShu~lty Nw1n0 Jnd WIDUon tA1W1 pr1o-+00 {fllC n/M1111p ~- ~Y PrgjrceN~rt 1* nlori th~te ~ to a reo~v u~ i~r fln pyt}vyNicN acAn arrn-a~gl atl+rr prop.ot HqR wNt rrwu~,t +~ Nrfonxtlo lihit rK.nao one R~ird.~0is~rtl~ nrw eund~ ean^6aotle+F1 tte9rmnp~ alEprtt~-:at Ih+ ryyAngb wl[t b~ triuwyr~ bU ~ D1411 of C1e~rwNMe: ' m14im~ ono dNignr Ftrs~pn~lraBon RY'ib11~r, tebrldu Nteo pNr'!W=I'iMM! Cade rD trmolodr ~ppltNmti pFPA CaeN~tlt+Pl-1.1i1 tiQl'IallF 1iR,1A-1A, i0. I[i1 ind t11lAnn~x 1h ~n4 AW MIrk1~'iNnp rnd~trranrhn+gl'1nri Mrda~ -. •.. . r ' NrIr11r: prow! Adder: per~ine~-aa~af 1 P.~ ';~:!T!~v'e:Uii ~ ~~iz~~' ~ aofiM ae,n~n t1aa+ Mme rAlr a bi n~aatrr,on~rrr-~- I~AM4~f gtMrllr ~~..ai1~~1 .W~.yrllv.i .rl. -..... ~~- ,, .11.1,.1... ,.... ..- .._.... _ ,~.. ~ooMisnbfrMrrMfPltoNfdrN+ft~ ~-KA `~~ . Stsal4NrbrNliirrtmplyl„OFInFIaw: ~ LeoPM~nm~r~dl+nmW1A'P ~~ iaw~duNs p.t v sl..~~-au ~a~ oo"~ = .. ~:,. moo: ~„_Ps1 . '~. tt ~. . ,:. rnwno. d dto.a~ rtinY. ~ eh. ou. at fh...r Nmseona~ ' >t lPaNol1! I.i ,., t~nrrne~r.Kaooauoud ~ .. . . t~no~„e~r~~n ~nyy ar.anw o~.~•a+~ 'ti • . L,'~A::Sir. 11'.r.•: :1;.1.:1. "1~ L:. ~DTAL NBtSAED IAN PL~OIN 1N.4.o.h L,,,Q to tellrnNV ava~rer INPPLY alIPF1C16N't'rta asst taav. At30vBC [~ NQ .. ..... . vae r nM Ili-~11 ~~`---~ '~ K"PraJ~"MrIWM•Nlr~PYti1A,lnrppty~-fh1YNM11S0: i/v`AM Pil wnr Pump InrormNlen: ~PumP (ayro101: ppm ChuM Prnrr~= nlltdpryµun: ,~,+,,,Dul pnuvrn~llPti9bilArl. WAL Onrlh Abin~ Tank Rllpo~l.' RECENEE~ SEP 4 4 2007 FlANN1NG I?EPARYIVlEI~lI CRY aF CLEARWATER f~U(~-2'7- ,?,00~ 1®:12f~ F'RCiM: C~.b 'SRC P~t1NTN 7c~'-552-445. 'Q: 94468036 ` P, ~:: ' +, b~il3f7l1ba/ lb: 4y /274468136 NORTFiSIDE ENG SVCS 06/30120@7 @9.31. 7275 X61 PI~BLLC LiTTLTT' . , . O ~~~ ~~ u~ SAX ME~S~AG~ CITY CAF G~,EAFtWA'~ER /PUBLIC UTIL.ITIE 1~50•C ARCTURAS AVE. iV. C~.EARVIfATER, Fl~. 33759 PHONE (72T) 562-~96U t=AX X727) 563x4967 LOCA710N: ~ ~~ S ~ FAX NUMBER: ~' L "~ FROM : ~ V~ O P G- '~" DATE; ~ • 3 ~ - o ~ TIME: 7~i~ I~UM19BER OF PACES (-NCLUQI,NG THJS CCII/E~R P1iGE~ f'~GE @2/08 PAGE 91 X31 ORIGINAL RECENED sEp o 4 zQO7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY'OF CLEARWATER ~r, 08f 30/ 2007 10:49 08/301707 ©9:31 7274468F~36 1275E .i2 NORTHSIDE ENG ~~fCS PUBLIC UTILITI ~LC~W ~'E~T CITY OP GLEARWATER WATER piC!'AR'FME}~lT ~'.i~~7 `~~ l~ ~9~~1 DATE OF ~"I;L~T ~ ~ d ~ STATIC: PSI ~q~"`" I~,ESIDI.IA,L PSI a2~ ~ .- J~ /7 D PITOT ~~ PSI ~ .~. ~./C~'`"~7 {,J ~ I ~ ~ ~ f7 ~ ~ ~ T~ FLOW ~ ~ .GPM ~ ~ 1 ~- ~ - HVDFtA~T ~ ~~ GRlD ~ ~~ , MlSC: ~ ~ I~-l~~ --~ CUSTOMER REQUESTING TEST O~GINA~ EtECENED SEP o 4 2007 PLANNING DEPgR~pE~~ City OF CLEARWAiER PAGE 03/08 PQ6F_ 02 / Water Supply Gurve (G) Fire Safety, Inc. Harbor Oaks Medical Center - 2nd Floor Page 2 Date 08-31-2007 ' City Water Supply: Demand: C1 -Static Pressure 72 D1 -Elevation 12.127 C2 -Residual Pressure: 66 n ~ ~ D2 -System Flow 181.614 C2 -Residual Flow :1190 ~ z ~ ~ D2 -System Pressure 60.605 o Hose (Adj City ) t o o m ~ Hose (Demand) 100 ro fP' ~ ~ D3 -System Demand :281.614 n ~ o ~ Safety Margin 10.978 m ~n °'^~ ~ ~ 150 140 130 p 120 R 110 E 100 S 90 S 80 C1 U 70 D R 6© E 50 40 30 20 10 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 FLOW (N " 1.85 } Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 E_ Y ~',a ~i f i:.y 1 E .-~ ei, ~~ <1 ~. ', ;i ~,~ .; _; -~ ~~~: ~Y 77 $._,~; ; ~~ .; .w. ,., r~.-i ~~. ~:~ ~'r'.i ~ ~ iii J~ r `+1 k,~ ~: ~~ ~~~~y ~: 'i `: ~, ~- ~? ';,~~:.~ ~, ~~ ~~:~ r, _;.~ ` 1 r~ ty ~ M1"'~'oq~1 f ` t ~ ~ =~ t ~~3 ~~~ fA ~ i :'~ N`~- t S i 1 ~i'~ ~~ ~ ^~ '. , ~~~ ~, STORMWATER REPORT FOR: HARBOR OAKS PROFESSIONA.E CENTER PR®JECT ~- ~a ~3 o ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ a~ ~ ~ 0 ~U G1~ ~,. Ram A. G~e~, Ph~J,, P.E. •#47431 October ?.d0? Project No. 0731 r~~ ~ , ~t ,~[, 1 '~~ .._ - r ., `.~i E; ,. Iii: `. '!i~ .~ DRAINAGE NARRATIVE The proposed construction activities consist of the following: • Construction of 37,017 S.F. of open impervious vehicular use, building and sidewalk area. • Construction of a stormwater pond to provide attenuation and water quality treatment for a volume equal to '%" of runoff over the entire site. • Treatment of stormwater will be achieved through an effluent underdrain system. The overflow will be piped. to an existing stormwater system on Magnolia Drive. • The more stringent of SWFWMD's 25yr / 24hrpnst-development flow not exceeding the 25yr / 24hr pre-development flow vs. Clearwater's weighted coefficient of runoff of stormwater detention was used to determine the storage volume requirement. It was found that the City of Clearwater's starmwater requirement (7,502 cf) was more strict than SWFWMD's requirement and therefore was used in the design of the pond. • The Drainage Calculations have been prepared in accordance with the City of Clearwater Drainage Manual. • The project is located in an open basin. Construction Qf this project will not increase the existing peak discharge rate or volume. • No wetlands are located in or adjacent to the project area. No wetland impacts will result from construction ofthis project. oRI~INAt ~2ECENED OCT 15 ZQOI PLANNING DEPARTMEM CITY OF CLEARWATER ,-- PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO. Harbor C~alCS Prof~~sional Cenf~r 731 ~ ' 55,295 SF = 3.27 ACRES 19,9n7 SF = 0.46 ACRES 0 SF = 0.00 ACRES 35,328 SF = 0.81 ACRES 55,295 SF 19,967 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = X5,328 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C = 0.30 T.O.C. = 60 MINUTES EXISTING CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERU. AREA= C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV. AREA= PROPOSED GONDITIONS 55,295 SF = 37,017 SF = 3,679 SF = 14,599 SF = 1.27 ACRES 0.85 ACRES 0.0$ ACRES 0.34 ACRES 55,295 5F 37,017 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 3,679 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 14,599 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C = 0.76 T.O.C. = 60 MINUTES TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV. AREA= C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV. AREA= 0.475 1 0.2 0.95 1 0.2 ORIGINAL RECEIIIE~ ocT ~~ ~oaa PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PROJECT NAME : Harbor Oaks Professional Center PROJECT NO.: ~ 731 POND STAGE STORAGE DATA T.O.V. EL.= D.H.W. 25 EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 34.50 4,069 0.093 9,468 34.25 3,874 0.089 8,475 34.00 3,679 0.084 7,530 33.00 2,900 0.067 4,241 32:33 2,378 0.055 2,473 31.501 1,731 0.040 768 31.00 1,341 0.031 0 TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUPIIE _ PROPOSED OUTFACE ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY VOLUME _ 55,295 SF 13.50 IN 2,304 CF 32.33 FT 2,473 CF ®RIGINP~ RECEIVED QCT 15 2i~a1 PIANi~MGC E~WA ER CfiY OF NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES 25 YEAR STORM EVENT PROJI=CTS Harbor Oaks Pro#essior~al Center PROJECT NO. 731 RUN-OFF COEFFICIENTS PRE-CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 55,295 SF 1.27. AC IMP. AREA= 19,967 'SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.475 POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 PERV. AREA= 35,328 SF OF PERV: AREA @ C = 0.2 C = _. 0.30 POST-CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 55,295 SF 1.27 AC IMP. AREA= 37,017 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.95 POND AREA= 3,679 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 PERU. AREA= 14,599 SF OF PERV. AREA. @ C = 0.2 C = 0.76 STORAGE CALCULATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE AREA = 1.27 AC TIME OF CONC. Tc = 60 MIN I @ Tc =60 (25 YEAR EVENT= 3.60 1NIHR Q(out) = G x I x A= 1.37 CFS POST-CONSTRUCTION TIME (MIN.) [ IN/HR) Q{in) CFS) INFLOW CF) OUTFLOW CF) STORAGE (GF 60.00 3.60 3.45 12,426 4,924 . 7,502 MAX. STORAGE _ WEIR DESIGN TOP. OF WEIR ELEV.= SOT. OF WEIR ELEV.= . H= Q= .. L=Q13.1 *H^1.5 = 7,502 CF 32.$3 FT 32.33 FT 0.50 FT or 6" 1,37 'CFS 1.25 FT or 15" ~CE~ P mNp CLEAR~A EST NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS , PROJECT:. Harbor Oaks Professional Center PROJECT NO.: 731 VOLUME PROVIAED = 2,473 C. F. BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 32.33 POND AREA (SF) = 2,37$ S.F. BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 31.00 POND AREA (SF) = 1,341 S. F. UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. _ .30.00 COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) = 0.09 FTIMW ' LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 2h FT SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN ~ 6 ]NCH ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HYD. GRAD. FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT FT/FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 32.33 2,378 1.91 0.33 2.75 0.70 41 2.56 747 292 32.00 2,118 1.58 0.33 2.75 0.57 41 2.11 661 313 31.67 1, 859 1.25 0.33 2.75 0.45 41 1.67 575 344 31.33 1,600 0.92 0.33 2.75 0.33 41 1.22 488 399 31 Ap 1, 341 TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME = 2,471 C.F. TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME = 22.5 hIOURS ~~~ aC~ 1~ 2~4~ 41A~~OF ~ EEp,RW ER C v ~~~ !'RCPtIRGD BY AND RE'C[JRN TO: Kr:N't- RUNNCi.,LS, P.A. 101117AiN ~`rRG~7', Sv1TC A SArDTY Il"ARB4R, )<+'L 34(95 Iris (727) 726.2728 Y(EN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA lNST# 2007276905 OS/2012D07 at 01:57 PM OFF REC BK: 15942 PG: ~4D1-1409 Doc7y~e;DEED RECORDING: +527.00 D DOC STAMP: $9275.00 1SPAC~ AriflVl; LIN!', FOIi RECpRU~NC IIATAJ W A. R.RANTY.I31J.1JI3 TI iI5 Il`ID)aNTURE, made this ~ day of J y %r _ _ , 2007, betweenTulvio DiVello, ns Trustee of #lie Ft. IIarrison .Property Land Trust, d<<# ~ ]Decemuer 30, 2005, whose address is 400 Isl~andway, No. 703, Clearwater, llorida 33767, Grantor (herein called '°Iiirst Party"}, and, SNKR I, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose address is 1815 I-lealth Care Drive, Triniiy, l~L 34655, Grantee (herein called "Second Party"}. WITNLSSLTH, that the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS and other good and valuable considerations, to it in hand paid, the receipt whexeof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained; sold and. transferred, and by these presents does grant, bargain., sell and transfer. unto the said party of the second. part and his heirs and assigns forever, all that certain parcel of land lying and being in the County of.Pinellas, and State of Florida, to wit: Legal. Description: 1•Jxhibit "A" attaclacd TOG~TIIER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances, with every privilege, right, title, interest and estate, dower and right of dower, reversion, remainder and easement thereto belo~il;ing or in anywise appertaining: TO ITAVE AND TO I-TOLD the same in fee simple forever. And the said party of the first part covenants with the said party of the second part that it is lawfully seized of the said premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, save and except for all covenairls and restrictions of record; that certain. mortgage originally filed in Official Records Book 14143, Page 9230, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, rlorida; in favor of Fifth Third Bank, anal subsequently assigned to S~novus Hank of Tampa 13ay in Official Records Book 15828, Page 1305; of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, having a current principal balance of X780,000.00, which nr~ortgage and balance grantee herein, try acceptance of this deed, hereby a,5,sumes and expressly agrees to pay; and taxes for the current year, and that it has good right and lawfill authority to sell the same; and that the said party of the first part cues hereby fully warrant the title to the said land, and will cle~end the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, r- ~ ~ a i~ ~~ `L ~ ~ Q U ~ U Z~ O ~~ ~U 11Wxptvkslnl\runnellspnlfi~rinsl.egullClients117iVello, rulvio- I•'ort I~farri5on SulelDeedWerranty.SNKfI ]doc.doc hag0 1 IN WITNESS WI ~ERCOF, tl~e said Party of the First Part 1}as hereunto set its hand and seal the clay and year move written. SiG1V'!/D~ SI;ALIID AND I3GLIVISI.tED IN OURPRGSENCGi Print Narne ,(~ ~~~~ ~rlrsc a~ COUNTY' OF PINELLAS I+t. IIarrison Property Land Trust, dated December 30, 2005 Tay; TtNlvio DiVello, Trustee The foregoing instrument was acknowledged Before me this _~~day of U , 2007, by T+nlvio DiVello, as `T'rustee of the Ft. FIarrison Property Land Trust dated ecelnber 30, 2005iwho is personally.ialowrl to me or who has prodlaaed identification and who did take an oath. (seal.] Notary Public Tate of Florida My Commission Expires ,` $ ~ Printed ame, ~ ~ (, W ~ ~ ~ f~'.j U tCr'Y,. CoCtim4L~.A(yipy~~ `f~;; MARYO.MANE9TAfi O L ~ ~ O • ~: :+_ MY CDMMISSIQN f DD 508212 ° Q, ~~ U ~' ••... ~a: EXPIRES; February 3, 2010 ~ ' a A,I~,~r` BaKkd7hruNaaryPuoncUndorwti~aro STATE OF FLORIDA ExT~~sIT «A„ Lot 24, I31ock 32, and Lots 1, 2, 3, 9 and 10 and 50 foot strip of vacated Railroad Right of way on East, and Lot 11, Block 34, Magnolia Park, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat I3ook 3, Page(s) 43, Public 12ecords of Pinellas Count}, Florida. °~ ~~ ~ cc~~ ~ aU o~ `~` ~ ~~ zo , ~ ~U n. S~t~` 9/4/2007 ~`I'• ~ Receipt #: 1200700000000007712 12:06:28PM ~ ~"= ~ Date: 09/04/2007 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2007-0902$ FLD2007-09028 Payments: 04 Flexible Commercial Fire -Prelim Site Plan 010-341262 010-342501 Line Item Total: Payer initials Check No Confirm No How Reeeived Check SUNTRUST ©FFICIAL, CHECK R_D 8845019 In Person Payment Total: 1.,205.00 200.00 $1,405.00 Amount Paid 1,405.00 $1,405A0 R~~~ SAP ~ ~ ~~~~ p ~N~F C~WA~R G THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Pale 1 of 7 cReceipt.rpt FLD2007-09028 1001 S FT HARRISON AVE OR OAKS PROFESSIONAL C T PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 29SB ZONING: C LAND USE: CG RECEIVED: 09/04/2007 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet Northside ~.~~. March 6, 200$ Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III. City of Clearwater 104 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: 10(}1 S. Ft: Harrison NES: 731 Dear Mr. Wells: ORIGINAL R~ENED MAR ~ 6 ~00~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT GRY OF GLEARWAIER CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • E:NVI RONMI:NTAL • TRANSPORTATION • Please accept this as a formal letter of withdrawal for the above case. The .project is currently under redesign. Upon completion, the project will be resubmitted under a different case. Sincerely, `- t..•~/ reen A. Williams Project. Director I'.O. BOX 4948 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4948 ADMiN@NOR"fHSIDEENGINEERING TECH@NORTHSIDEENGINEERING 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 44b • 8036 Norths~de ~_~~ ~.~. October 25, 2007 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department. 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Civil Land Planning Due Diligence Reports Re-Zoning, Land Use, Annexation Stormwater Management Utility E7esign Traffic Construction Administration RE: FLD2007-09028 -- 1001 SOUTH FT HARRISON AVENUE Dear Mr. Wells: Please accept this letter as a formal request to continue the above referenced project. The developer and design team are working to improve the design and additional time is required to accomplish the improved development plan. Thank you for your continued assistance with this project and please feel free to contact me if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, James Evans, Project Planner cc: Doreen Williams, Project Director NES File 731 P O. Box. 4948 Clearwater; FL 33758-494$ tech@northsideengineer~ing.cc~m 727 443 2869 Fax 727 446 8036 ~~~Lf V ~ 1 2s . ~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVECES CITY OF CLEARWATER Lar Due Diligen+ Re-Zoning, hand Use, ~ ,~t~~.t~•t~',PJI~.~~ ~~"~C~GC£'f;2< ~/t2~. Stor•mwacer M lJti ConSt+'uccion Adrr October 25, 2007 Mr, Wayne Wells Planner 11Y City of Clearwater Planring Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2007-09028 -- IOOI SOUTH FT HARRISON AVENUE Dear Mr. Wells: Please accept this letter as a formal. request to continue the above referenced project. The developer and design team are working to improve the design and additional time is required to accomplish the improved development plan. Thank you for your continued assistance with this project and please feel free to contact me if you have questions or require additional, information. Sincerely, James Evans, Project Planner cc: Doreen Williams, Project Director NES File 73"l. Wells, Wa ne . Frs~m: James Evans ~evans@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:55 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Doreen Williams; Housh Ghovaee Subject: RE: FLD20fl7-09028, 1001 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Fi1e0001.jpg Wayne I need to request a continuance for the above project, please see attached letter, I will be mailing you. the original letter today. Thank you James evans Northside Engineering 727-443-2869 ------Original Message----- From: Wayne.WellsQmyClearwater.com (mailto:Wayne.Wells~myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 5:13 PM To: James Evans Subject: FLD2007-09028, 1001 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue James - Attached is a letter informing you of the date this request will be heard by the CDB. The original letter_is being mailed. Wayne « Ft. Harrison S. 1001 CDB Letter.doc» 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 5:13 PM To: 'jevans@northsideengineering.com' Subject: FLD2007-09028, 1001 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue James - Attached is a letter informing you of the date this request will be heard by the CDB. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne i _~ i=t. Harrison S. 001 CDB Lette. ,.1- ~:r.;„~., ,r ~1 ~I1 t, .~~ r r~~ , i ~; ; ~: .., ~- - ~ ~y ~ ~,.1r,'~~ _~ "`t + ~ POST OFFICE 130X 4748, CLEARWA'I~ER, l LORIDA JJ758-`*7`*8 ' ~'~'~ '~+' `a~'~n~^~'i~p?}I MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILD[NG, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~375~ ~~~~~~~4~~~~~ `~~ TLEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4Sb5 ~daQt. PLANNING DEPARTMENT October 22, 2007 James Evans Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 300 South Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33765 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2007-09028) Dear Mr. Evans: You have filed Case No. FLD2007-09028 for property located at 1001 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue for Flexible Development approval to permit 19,814 square feet of medical offices and medical clinics in the Commercial (C) District {south side of Magnolia Drive) with a reduction to the front (west along South Ft. Harrison Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building and pavement}, a reduction to the front (north along Magnolia Drive) from 25 feet to 7.5 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side {south} setback from 10 feet to 7.5 feet (to building), to 4.83 feet (to sidewalk) and to 6.5 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and to 6.8 feet (to dumpster enclosure and pavement) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 29 feet (top of roof deck), 32.83 feet (top of parapet}, 38.58 (top of roof ridge) and 46 feet (top of tower), with an accessory stormwater retention pond within the Office {O) District (north side of Magnolia Drive), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and a reduction to the front perimeter buffer along Magnolia Drive from 14 feet to 7.5 feet, a reduction to the buffer along the south property line from five feet to 4..83 feet and a reduction to the foundation landscaping requirement along the north side of the building from five to one-foot, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. This case has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on November 20, 2007. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at „ -112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Since ely, ~, 1 i Wayne/M. Wells, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepnrtmentVC D BIFLEX (FED) (Pending cased Up for the next CDB1Ft. Harrison S 1001 Harbor Oaks Medical Center (C + O) - 1110.07 CDB - WWIFt. Harrison S. 1001 CDB Letter.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOIiN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.$. JOHNSON, COUNGILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 11:28 AM To: 'jevans@northsideengineering.com' Subject: FLD2007-09028, 1001 5. Ft. Harrison Avenue James - Attached are comments still outstanding as of today. These comments will not keep the request off the November 20, 2007, CI~B agenda, but need to be addressed in revised drawings and written material. Please read these comments and call me as soon as you have read them so we can discuss. Wayne .Y `i ~,. ti dre action nda rerrtaining c ~~~ ~~ DND DS DC~H f ~S IN . FISDED S , C ® II AF2C1-1QTECTS • F''LANi~ERS October 15, 2007 City of Clearwater, DRC RE: DRC application case number FLD2007--09028 Dear City Official: In reply to the comments received from the City of Clearwater far the Fort Harrison office facility noted above, dated October 4, 2007, we have the following responses (in BOLD): Planning Department: Comment #I9: Sheet A4.1 -Provide dimension for the following: a. height of the building from grade to the top of the roof deck; b. height of the parapet from top of the roof deck to the top of the roofed structure in the center of the north side of the building. Response: Target heights as well as dimensions to parapets and roojpeaks have been provided (see sheetA4.l) Comment#20: Sheet A4.1-Indicate on the plans, potentially through a legend, the proposed colors of the various exterior portions of the building on all sides. Respanse: Color elevations have been provided with actually paint samples of the proposed colors. Comment#2l: Sheet A4.1-Dimension of the plans the distance the cave projects from the face of the building. Response: Dimensions of the cave projections have been provided {see sheet A4.1) Comments#32: The building is deemed to have a flat roof as the main roof. Need to dimension the building elevation with the height. from grade to the top of the main roof. Need. to also provide a dimension from the main roof deck to the top of the parapets, to the top of the architectural roof in the center of the north side of the building and. to the top of the architectural tower on the northwest corner of the building (as well as the tower aver the elevator). Application will need to include as part of the request height increases for the main flat roof(if greater than 25 feet), from the top of the main flat roof far parapets (if more that 42 inches from the tap of the roof deck), to the top of the architectural roof in the center of the north side of the building (from top of main flat roof) and to the top of the architectural tower on the northwest corner of the building(from top of main flat. roofl. Response: Target heights as well as dimensions to parapets and roof peaks have been provided (see sheetA4.1) e~ ~ W c p r Sincerely, ~ ° FISHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. s~ ~+ U LX u U' U W ® ~ ~ . Z Z 0 Joe McCoy ~ ~ ~ ~. AA CD01344 2315 BELLFAlA ROAD ®CLFARWATER, FL 33764 (727) 443-4436 ~ FAX(727J 531-6653 • wNrovfisherarchrtects.com .~-- October 11, 2007 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2007-09028 1001 S FT Harrison Ave DRC Response Dear Mr. Wells: ~CVj~ La.f1C{ ~~~CiCI[!~~ ~c~ bili~ei~ce ~te~~er~e~s ire-.a~7ir~g, Land tJse~. ~~~n~~a-LiOn ~cc.~('~rvvat~r Mat~~agejn~i~t Ucil~ry G~sign Tra(iit Co€tstx°ucr~ts[~ f6d~t'iir~isrr~€Cian Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on October 4, 2007. 1. Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. We have enclosed an autoturn drawing demonstrating a delivery van can easily maneuver in and out of the loading zone with out obstruction. Prior to issuance of a Building Fermit: 1. There is already an existing 5' wide sidewalk on Magnolia Street frontage. 2. Acknowledged, see sheet C3.1, also see Detail #103 on sheet C5.2. 3. Acknowledged. 4. See note #2 on sheet C3.1. 5. Acknowledged. 6. See Detail #305 on sheet C5.2. oaiG~N~ RECEIi~ED Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: ®~~ ~ ~ Z~Q7 1. Acknowledged, see sheet C3.1. 2. Acknowledged, see note on sheet C3.1. PWNNING DEPAR7MEPIT 3. Acknowledged. cm~ of aE,naware~ Fire 1. We have relabeled from New Class 1 Standpipe to fire department connection and have moved the FDC to FT Harrison side of the building. 2. We have revised the parking layout traffic circulation per rim Kelley's request to allow for an unobstructed Fire Department access. A turnaround wilt not be required since the plan now shows no deadends longer than 150' P.a. Bcrx 498 ~I~ar•wac~i; FL 3758-948 t~ch~~€°thsideer~gincc~-irsg.c.on~ 727 4~S 2.869 fax X27 4~~ 826 Land Resources 1. W e have revised the parking layout in order to preserve tree #30, see enclosed tree preservation plan. 2. Tree #30 is now being shown on all Civil and Landscape plans. ~. The tree inventory submitted by Alan Mayberry describes tree #30 being preserved. by allowing an undisturbed rooting area equal to three fourth's the tree's dripline which we have done. The storm pipe's location is outside the undisturbed rooting area, see sheet C4.1. 4. See cross section B-B on sheet C4.1 which shows parking placed "On Grade" 5. See enclosed Tree Preservation Plan provided by Butler Design Group. Landscaping See revised plans showing a foundation landscape area offive-foot in width on the North side of the building. ~2. All interior landscape islands are a minimum of eight feet in width measured from curb to curb, see revised sheet C3.1. ~ 3. See revised landscape plans. /'4. We have removed wheel stops east of the building, 5Q The landscape islands are now consistent with the civil and architectural plans. ~ 6. We have now realized that the required landscape buffers along the south and east property lines is 5', and have revised. our narrative. We have provided a five foot buffer along the North, West and East sides of the retention area, and have provided a 10 foot buffer along the South side of the retention area on Magnolia. 17. We have revised sheet C3.1 to delinate the interior landscaping areas, we have not counted any of the 10 buffer along magnolia as interior landscaping. f 11. See revised enclosed tree inventory sheet provided. by KNOW 1T NOW, INC. We have delineted which trees are to be removed by placing an X over them. ~ 12. The Easternmost interior landscape island has been revised to show landscaping, and will be counted towards interior landscape area. Parks and Recreation: 1. Acknowledged, and open space impact fees will be paid prior to issuance of building permit. C~RIGINAG i2ECEiVED OCT ~ ~ 2~~7 PLANNING DEP/~RTMI:I~~ Stormwater 1. The smartbox has been removed from the plans and has been replaced with a control. structure which discharges to the 12" HDPE (which runs east and west along the North side of Magnolia) via a 12" RCP. 2. We have provided a minimum clearance of 5 feet between the top of bank and the right of way. The followin shall be addressed rior to buildin ermit. 1. We have shown on the grading plan the location. of the underdrain system. 2. We will provide a SWFWMD permit once we have received it. 3. Gutter system will discharge to splash pads, which in turn will sheet flow to the pavement area which will be picked up by proposed storm system. 4. See traffic bearing note provided on Type "C" Inlet Detail on sheet C5.1 5. We have contacted LA Engineering to verify the pipe material and invert elevations. The invert elevations have not changed since the previous submittal. Traffic En~ineerin~ 1.We have redesigned the loading space to have uninhibited maneuverability. There will be no semi. truck deliveries to this building only small van deliveries. We have demonstrated the loading zone is fully functional, see autoturn drawing showing unobstructed access in and out of the loading zone. See sheet C3.1 for the 24' wide backout space. 2. We have revised the handicap ramp locations to eliminate any conflicts with building entrances. The above to be addressed rior to a Communit Develo ment Board hearin oRlG~NAL RECENEl7 1. Acknowledged 2. Acknowledged ®~r ~ ~ ~~~~ PIANNtNG DEPq}7rh~lENT Planning qNO~ c~ l1.We have revised the loading zone and have demonstrated that it is now fully ~w,arER functional, see sheet C3.1 ~ 2. We have corrected both architectural and civil plans to match. 13. We have revised the handicap ramp locations to eliminate any conflicts with building entrances ~ 4. We have corrected both architectural and civil plans to match. ~5. See sheet C3.1 for building dimension. ~11 interior landscape islands are a minimum of eight feet in width measured from curb to curb, see revised sheet C3.1. 7~. The egress door has been moved to the southwest corner of the building. and will not reduce the required 5 foot landscape buffer. (~$. Acknowledged. .] 9. See enclosed 1 S copies of the updated survey including the lot on the north side of magnolia. 10. We have one freestanding sign which complies with the setbacks on sheet C3.1 11. See sheet C3.1 for the required sight visibility triangle at the intersection. ¢~ See enclosed traffic study justifying reduction to the 40 stacking requirement. 13. We have corrected for site data table for items a-g. ~lannin~ cont... ~-14. See revised sheet C L 1. X15. See revised sheet C1.1. ~-16. See revised application including the required parcel number ~17. Sae enclosed signed and notarized Affidavit to authorize agent. ~ 18. See note on sheet C3.1. r 19. See revised architectural plans. X20. See architectural color elevations. X21. See revised architectural plans. 122. See revised page 1 of the application. X23. See revised description of request within the Comprehensive Infill Narative. 124. See revised Comprehensive Tnfill Narative. ~ 25. See revised Comprehensive Infill Narative. 126. See revised Comprehensive Infill Narative. 127. See revised Comprehensive Infill Narative. ~~28. See revised Comprehensive Infill Narative. 129. See revised Comprehensive Infill Narative. 130. See revised Comprehensive Infill Narative. 131. See revised Comprehensive Infill Narative. X32. See revised architectural plans. 133. We have amended the Project criteria to address proposed increases to building heights. Sincerely, ,~/~ 4~~~~'% James Evans Project Manager NIrS #533 DIZC response Ib/4/07 RMEt/rmr ORIGAVpt RFC.~~ ~~~~ ~ ~; ~oo~ t'sRPdNPRIG C(FY OF C~~RW ~R ~ ~ ~,- ~ 1 ° '~ Imo`: ~.:;,~ _ ~ ~ _ ' .in _ ~~ , ^ ~~' LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: October 15, 2007 To: City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Attn: Sherry Watkins Reference: HARBOR OAKS MEDICAL CENTER NES #: 731 We Transmit: {X) Enclosed (}Under Separate Cover OOriginals {)Mail OCourier (}Prints OPick-up OHand Delivered OAddendum OShop Drawings {)Per Your Request OFor Your Review & Comment OSpecifications OFor Your Use (X) For Your Approval (X} Applications OFor Your Files { }For Your Information (}Floppy Disk. Copies Date Description 15 10/15/07 .Flexible Develo meet A lication 15 10/15/07 warrant deed 15 10/15/07 Bvundar To o ra hic, and Tree surve 15 10/15/07 Draina a Calculations & Narrative 15 10/15/07 Civil Drawin s (24"x36") 15 10/15/07 Landsca e & Irri anon Plans (24"x36" 15 10115/07 Tree Inventor Sheet (24"x36" 4 10/15/07 Fire Flaw Calculations 15 10/1S/07 Com rehensive Landsca e A lication 15 10/15/07 Reduced Site Plans 8'/z x 11 15 10/15/07 Reduced Color Landscape 8'/2 x ll ®RiP[FIA~ ~ECENE~ ocT ~ ~ ~~a~ "'~e`• " ~'' PIAldP11N~ ~EPAR'PYViE~T _ :, _ ..: ~ ~. '~: CIT1fOFCLEARWATER - ~ ~t't ' ~''~ '`~ Comments: Please do .: - >: esitate to contact this aftice should ou ha- w further questions ar `~ ~ comments re~ardin~ this groiect. enclosures Copies To: .File By: ORICaINAL. R!_GEI1~D OCR 1 ~ 20Q~ PLANNING pEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 '1:42 PM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FLD2007-09028, 1001 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Doreen - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the above referenced application, to be reviewed by the DRC at 11:00 am on Thursday, October 4, 2007, in our offices. Wayne .---,, ~~;~; draft 10.4.07 rc action agend. Clearwater U September O5, 2007 Housh Ghovaee 300 S. Belcher Road Clearwater, F133765 VIA FAX: 727-446-8036 RE: FLD2007-09028 -- 1001 S FT HARRTSON AVE -- Letter of Completeness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system anal assigned the case number: FLD2007-09028. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Carnmittee (DRC) will review the application for sufBeiency on October 04, 2007, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South. Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case wily be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562 4504 or Wayne. Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ~ l`'~ L~~%Q,~ Wa Wells. AICP Planner III CITY OF CLLARWATER PLANNING DEPAR'T'MENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLIRIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 552-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W WW.IVIYCLEARWATER.COM Letter of Completeness - FLD2007-09028 - 1001 S FT HARRISON ~! YE FISHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2315 Belleair Road Clearwater, FL. 33764 (727} 443-4436 (727) 531-6653 (fax) ^ Hand Delivered ^ Fed-Ex ~ Other ^ Regular Mail Norhtside Engineering Services Ilnc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 i Clearwater, Florida 337SS Phone: 727-433-2869 Fax: 727-446-8036 ATTENTION: Doreen A. Williams DATE: September 5, 2007 JOB NUMBER: 27036 - Ft. Harrison Medical Center WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS 14 09A5.07 Fisher and Associates Inc. 24x36 Black & White Elevations (A4.1} 15 09.05.07 Fisher and Associates Inc. 8.5 x 11 Black & White Elevations (A4.1) 14 09.05.07 Fisher and Associates Inc.. 24x 36 Floor Plans (A2.1, A2.2) 15 09.05.07 Fisher and Associates Inc. 8S x11 Floor Plans (A2.1, A2.2) 1 09.05.07 Fisher and Associates Inc. Colored of all Elevations 1 09.05.07 Fisher and Associates Inc. Colored of all Elevations REMARKS: For your use ad reference. FILE: ~~ f ' 1 I ~~~, ~:~ ~~~' M1Y4s i' :-' ;,c:;tl r':'t~,;ui '~!:~~:. f_.. 1 a Q I a ~ I I 1 80 ~ , 541 I h m I r ~ I 1 I I~ I 1 $~ 450 I'-1 ~/q-~7 I I 12 10 I g g I I 4 I 12 810 805 2 11 110 19 28 v 11 2 I a PHASE 1 I L PF s8 f ` _ ` o y ~ I I 1 812 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - / ~ ~ 43 41 3 I ~ I 3:i arr ~s siS i 1 1 I I 1 8i$ 8a7 ~ ~ ui 8'~ 2a I ~ J PHASE VI IA ~ n w I ~ S I I JASMINE WAY ~ I a n R q6 o 828 - ~ - ~ 22620 I ~ - -1 I ~ ~ 0 s ~ ~I ----~ ' v l Q i I F I Q I 800 ~ m~ 5a a9 _ 8~ i 841 --- r a a I I a I 5d S I 44 I 42 1 40 I 36 ~ I 3q esi I PHASE VI IB I I 1 902. 905 S,s7 853 , 12 - 8S7 - _I 2 - I I 77 1 7 7f I ~ I f s 3 ~ - ~ I PHAS VI 5 73 1 I 907 fi I I 6 4 652 1 I I N I N I~ v I Q 1 fi~ -_ a- 1 ( I~ ~ ~ I PHASE V I 63 ~ 9~ I I~ $ o m ~o w f MAGNOLIA DR ~ ~ Q e ~, ~ Q Q I 1 a 1001 1 ~ ~ I I I ~ I I I 1000 11 2 ~ ! _ 1 I I I 4501 i~ 7z I m I I ~ ~ 2 11 10 9 I I ~ I . -~ l I I Q i 1 i 2 ~ ~ g E 9 i 3 a 1 5 1 I I I I I I I 1040 ~ 1009 3 - - ~ ~ - - ~ - ~ - C` I- I I f1 1 ff1 11 I m I r Io IQ o ~o ~ 1 103 I O ~ 1055- a s I 7 1 a I zz 1 21 50 I ~ I 1 12o 1 19 118 1 17 16 15 I1a ~ b v a 1 v ~~ 11046 y ~ I 1 I 1 I 1 LOTUS PATH - - y 5 -I- I- - -` - I - - - I I 1- 1 -~~ I -1- - s 1 ~ I a l i of I 1100 - - 1 - ^ - - - I _ - ~ - - T ~ - T - ~ - - y ~ I I 114 ~ 112 I 110 106 I 106 i102 1 104 1101 c - 11~" 10 19 s I I l I I 1 1 I I I 5 1 I I I q 2 I I f 12 13 ~ 4 6 1 7 e A I ~ 39 - I 1 6 7 6 15 1 4 3 1 1114 1105 3 I I I I I I I I I 1116 4 I g 7 1 6 I 22 127 I ~ 20 I 19 118 17 1 16 15 p e o a 'NV l ~a ? 1i8A68 70 - ~ 5 _ ,001 I u~ in I I I m I I Q I N I ~ l l I I A I m 1 m ~ ~ JEFFORDS ST w I ~ EXISTING MAP Owner: SNKR f, LLC Case: FLD2007-09028 site: 1001 South Ft. Harr ison Avenue Property ~ ~ 2 Size{Acres),: 15/29/15/54450/034/0010 15/29/15/54450/034/0030 PIN: 15/29/15/54450/034/0090 15/29/15/54450/034/0110 15/29/15/54450/032/0240 Atlas Page: 2956 • ST CHESTNUT ST ~ ~ a ~' ~ h ROGERS ST ~ ROGi=RS z ¢~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ s z HaFao~n ~s ~~~ a ~. O PINS ST PINE PROJECT ~ AREA c~~e~t `~ ~~ ~~5 0 0 " ~ DRUI[7 R17 s URtJIQ RD , ASMINE ~,yqY JASMINE ~ IufA L!A DR ~ Q LR^~TUS PATH z LOTU S ~ ~ = JE~FORDS ~' ~l n ~ ~~~ ~' ~ _~J ~ a ._w^~•~ ~ ~ w C-FrANb CENTRAL ~• •••• ~ z ~ ~ • • • • U ~?'~:; •••, 1t: • ~ PINE LtAS nw. ..'.._ .~. ~' d ~ LOCATJOIV MAP owner SNKR I, LLC Case: FLD2007-09028 site: 100 South Ft. Harrison Avenue Property Size(Acres): ~ ~ 2 15/29/15/54450/034/0010 15/29/15/54450/034/0030 PIN: 15/29/15/54450/034/0090 15/29/15/54450/034/0110 1S/29/15/54450/032/0240 Atlas Page: 2958 l e e l Q I I ~ l 80 1 >~ $I g I 5 1 $ r^ ~ I I i I O B03 4 4 0 1 1~~ I I 12 I 10 I I $ 6 4 2 2 ~ 9 11 2 11 110 PFfASE 1 I PF ~ I I 1 ~ I B10 B05 , ~ ~ ~ ; 3 28 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I I 812 ~ ~ - - ~ I 43 I 41 I 3 I 35 '~ 8aa / 1 1 855 B57 ~ ,'~ ~6 24 123 ~ PHASE VIIA ~ I ~ I v e 8b9 54 ' 82A I I ~+' v 1 v 1 `~ 820. 1 ~ ~3 O ~ B 82D `~2 O I ~ 2620 ~ 829 - ~ _ ~ _ I JASMINE WAY I A o B33 ® ~ I _ - - _ ~ . ~ --- v y m I v 900 5 839 ~ fd 3 ~ -- 84b x a I a l I e , ~ J ~, ~ I 84~ I ~ I I 36 ~ 5 I ~ PHASE VI16 44 42 40 ~ 38 ~ ~ 1 ~ 848 I S9 B5ff 1 I 2 -_ 1 I 902 905 ~7 83i" - - - - 2 I I I ~b 1 3 - l I PHAS VI 77 75 1 73 I 71 907 6 1 18 4 1 652 1 I I ~ ~ 4 I I ~ I 650 1 Q I tr l a I 906 W _ _- I~ s ~ ~ PHASE V 1 ~ 9os ~ ~ I MAGNOLIA DR Q ~ z S ~ vl I I 1 v1 `a I 9000 1 "' 1001- - '~ 1 I I I I I I I ~ I I 72 I 70 68 2 2 11 I I I 1 I U ~ l I a 10 4 I s 16 1 7 1$ 9 1 1 1 2 I s I I I I low 1 1 7 I 1009 3 - - r- ~ - ~ 35 ~ - I- ~ - ~ 111 I I ,,, I o 110 to ~ io ~ 1 1 I o ioa I I 1055 _4- 6 II 7 8 50 22 i 21 120 I 19 118 177 I 16 15 114 ~ I 1 I `d' o I v 1 `7 1046 [[~e 11 I I 1 5 ~~ ~ 1 I 1 ~ ~ 1 LOTUS PATH _ - - - 1 _t- 1 - - i - ~ - - - - - I& I Q I 1 ~ lfoo 1 - ~ _ - ~ I-~ 1-- ~ ~-- .- 7 - - - I 1 I 1 1102 i14 I 142 110 108 I 106 100 1109 - R n~ 1o I s s ~ I I I I I 1 I I I I I 5 I I 1 I -- 2 I 1 1 2 1 3 14 6 1 7 1 8 A w F ss • I _ ~ I 1 11 i4 1005 3 1 I I I 8 7 6 5 ~ 4 3 I 1 1 1 I 4 I 21 120 19 118 I 7 I e I 6 17 16 I 15 °. I e e I 4 I& 11 rs ~ 1 r$ Ase _ _ _ y I I 1 ~ g l I~ i I ~ I I I O~ I 1 1 d EFFORDS ST ZONING IV~AP Owner: S~1KR I, LLB Case: FLD2007-09028 site: Harrison Avenue 1001 South Ft Property 1 12 . Size(Acres): . 15/29/15/54450/034/0010 15/29/15/54450/034/0030 PIN: 15/29/15/54450/034/0090 15/29/15/54450/034/0110 15/29/15/54450/032/0240 Atlas Page: 2958 Wells, Wa ne . From: Fresk, Sheryl Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:13 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2007-09028 AEF21AL.doc EXISTING.doc LOCATION.do ZONING.doc Sheryl A. Fresk City of Clearwater Engineering Department (727)562-47b.3 Welis, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, ©ctober 22, 2007 4:34 PM To: Herman, Jason Subject: Map request for FLD2007-09028, 1001 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Jason - Attached is a map request far Case FLD2007-09028 for the property at 1001 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks.- W ayne FLD Map equestform.do~ Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2007-09028 Date Requested: October 22, 2007 Date Requested for (date: October 30, 2007 (if possible) Maps Requested X^ Location Map X^ Aerial Map X^ Zoning Map X^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineerin g X^ -Legal Description X^ Survey X^ Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Narne Owner: SNKR 1, LLC ~ Case: FLD2007-09028 site: 1001 South Ft. Harrison Avenue I Property Size{Acres): 1 27 ' 15/29/15/54450/034/0010 ~ 15/29/15/54450/034/0030 PIN: 15/29/15/54450/034/0090 ~ 15/29/15/54450/034/0110 15/29/15/5445fl/032/0240 Atlas Page: 295B ~L ~ • 286A L .xa ~ `I .~ ` I ~ ~ ~~ ~ r- - -~ aova `..._ ..a R ~j ~ ~`~' RKeli ii. . R: • i ~ L Wrt • r- - --t L 'f_ . J , . . A t 91 !i a , !I ' fx Lino i `LJI! P ~ m r~ - . :. . a<<.. ". .. R'_ __..~._.. ~ ~ rl __.___I[J..ll l~ r.l ~, @fi ~ . L im ;, ~ ............ r.. ., Lral ~ f: , -r-'t---... .ra i J, .. .._ __ ? . i ' 1 S x r-- ~.r -q , s l f: ........ ~..-._ ~f f a e' 1 ~ .I, 1. :, 2e7a i a , 1 ..-' E-- . ~ ....'. t • , i I 1 , ? .... A w' ~ ," . 1. " ; ,; ~ . z learwater ~ ~ a a~ i . i ......n...i ~; g~ , u-..-~.~....~~ ~ ~ ?)-~-~"-~' ; .f PREPAREGBY - - . -T --~- ° Ed PUBLIC WORKS ADMENI5TRATION ® o I , ~ i i 1 ' , I ' ENGINEERINGlGIS 180 S M rtle A Cl r ~ I I' p + . ~ " ; . y va., earwater, FL 73756 Ph : 727 56 I ~ ~ . { 1 2.4758, Fax: (7271528.4755 -......_ ...... , ; , , ~ :. , , ; www.MyC[earwateccom r ~ L - ~ '• ~. ` if ~ •• f I ® " ~ hg ' d r • ~ 'i ' „i, I , ~ R~'j""+'rt y " Pubi'i Wrvmflbn tl.u 4 nvNN NbV Y,e cib WCAOarwMw A1aiC nbrlu AA,WtlsasaaYErN•,asM~, uMmuafb..¢eply ~+.~r.tlfMN tl,. u,WnimdhP ASllp Dap reaMtlw mll bd b n D 4 - ~4l t 4i..fr ~ j w ., epWO.s mM.w„u+Y~Aa wiA aAGryW•MAWArE w.vuaa~MpiLL mi m p~ p E I p ~ i E ~ s nv nKV.cmpbr......rvra: ~sy~armr. e.o,t..M ~ i $ ~ a a orwviy,Wrw.. Fmn.mc,., ea oy W Urwour PWAAi i ne RdA1' wm•1., asRxfsl•a Mara,s,ua wMSUf. aalnaiel•. i i L ~ ~ N , I ~ I ~ I w E r 1~ 10a 9r0 0 pM yy ~~ Tea i _ _,. .. a-~ i r,s~, . 6 i........_ p ~ c .3 , v r.,tl._ ~ A ci =i I " .. 8r ~ ci .a .tl ~~.~ ti ~ ~ 5`ar ' 6r ~i S E " I •k~ ,r; ep' ~E ., «. aPUP Rp. prat ......................__.........__. i 7: 3 b i c. ° ~ a wa• ; . cl i >o a --_...e...-..--..----~ ............. , , i" i° ,• ' i ' ~ i 'r ,wcr ... r a. i i .ro , ~ e na u ' i. .... . & , , nr a n i .i ~ i w ', i .i xi a a; a( ~ ~; I ~ .a. I a.wMi ._.... ..._ .__. ~ .- J t, I v i p E' I ~ i .: i a ~~ ,lip 53 ~ i I a. I ~O ~ R . Lfr r C t ~ wwr ..J " r Rielotu oR. A ! 1 wer i i i "~ "~ rl ~ i I I i i i i ., ~ i . • I ,. I " ~ . ,aR .,I~ ",i. ~ ,aaE ; ~ j',.,.~ 'I aYl, !a 13 is ~a oa ! i ~ =T-~ '!'1 it "e~. P e EI- x.r. .?B _=- ~- --r.... _ _..i.. -_r j . I• I" ~ ~'; o,w re,x .__.._ ._.....t._... .. ...1 i •uui• 1 f ...... ...._. I _ ... ~• o. I nT^^. Fi , 1 I ~ ' I ~, ,a iry's ~ w .. t " ' ..L_ i E J , I 1 ~ ~, 77 i I In ,, ,.+ [ j . ' ' ~ ~ `: ~ t 8 8 ; ,.w --- ~ - i . • j . --•---•- - , , I pi` ij ~ 8 . ~ r. ---- mo 7 ~ ~ ` E , ~. ~ I .~.~ !.~,I ~ . _ ~ Ot E bl&5F ii~e Ejc"a':~i?F~- -3 ~ - a I _ , ._..... q . i~ e ......... r ~ _ ~B R~~~~~n I,>a .~.~.~~d.~. MOR •UN.n 0.wM PPnwn~ IO0. ~ROn a.^Rb RU~ie.rua~My aaP -M.14 NM,a P.n. raNL00-pia„nw,ngP N.ONMmaferw.,m ancoo ~E,°MfYfwere.n.m cm....~„ OMry W41; mwracu~oamxn aicw usi ourncra T _alrti Ini. utlimrolRxNrenNTW.wlay, TwYm e-cn.aw ovR.on sr..a....e.,., o-oa.ab.~ . »...,~.w,n,.. -. ~ City Owned Property • Agreement to Annex ~ Annexa8on o Deannexatlon + CGnec6on c Remising ~ i , L>w SUB NUMBER • g r P ~ I ( - ar w a lat) s ' O BLOCK NUMBER .~ ~L O BUB PARCEL NUMBER ~~~ :,~ armi PARCEL NUMBER (M6B1 1 . it . _ LAND HOOK {COMMON OWNERSHIP( ~~~ I ~ r PLATTED aUBDNIBION BOUNDARY ial .J "~" ~ w Q COUNTY HIGHWAY ia. l~ O STATE HIGHWAY ,w 10 U9. MIOMWAV alb xl I .i, si„ Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Mer 21, ?U85 SE 1/4 of 76-29.15 295B e,-, 11:00 am Case Number: FLD2007-09028 -- 1001 S FT HARRISON AVE ~ ~ • ~ ~ Owner(s): Fort Harrison Property Land Tr ~~ C/0 Di Vello, Fulvio Tre Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: Na Phone, FAX: No Fax., E-MAIL: No Email ` ~ Applicant Snkr I, Llc ~^~ 181.5 Health Care Drive Trinity, F133655 ~.~ TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Housh Ghovaee '~$ ~ ~ ~~j~ ~ ~' 300 S. Belcher Raad Clearwater, F133765 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: renee@northsideengineering.com Location: 1.27 total acres located at the southeast corner of South. Ft. Harrison Avenue and Magnolia Drive and on the north side of Magnolia Drive approximately 350 east of South Ft. Harrison Avenue adjacent to the west side of the Pinellas Trail Atlas Page: 29513 Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development to permit 19,814 square feet of medical offices and medical clinics in the. Commercial (C) {south side of Magnolia Drive) and the Office (0) (north side of Magnolia Drive) Districts with a reduction to the front (west along South Ft. Harrison Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building and pavement), a reduction to the front {north along Magnolia Drive) from. 25 feet to 7.5 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 7.5 feet {to building), to 4.83 feet (to sidewalk) and to 6.5 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and to 6.8 feet (ta dumpster enclosure and pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and a reduction to the front perimeter buffer along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 7.5 feet, a reduction to the buffer along the south property line from five feet to 4.83 feet and a reduction to the foundation landscaping requirement along the north side of the building from. five to one-foot, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 82.04 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Neighborhood Assoc Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 320 Magnolia Drive TELEPHONE: 461-9657, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne We11s, Neil Thompson, Steve Doherty, Rick Albee, Jim Keller Applicant: Renee Ruggiero, John Buscema, James Evans, Bi11 Fisher The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: ' General Engineering: No Comments Environmental: No Comments Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 15 ~~ 9/2S/07-Revise the storm to be outside the canopy of tree #30 prior ro CDB. 10/16/07-Show the revised storm location on Sheets L1.1 and L1.3 prior to CDB (see Sheet C4.1). 2 . 9/25/07-Parking should be placed "On Grade" with an aeration system at tree #30. Provide prior to CDB. 10/16/07-Show the concrete limits on all plan sheets. Even though cross section B-B, shown as A-A on the plans, indicates that the 6" concrete is on grade the proposed. grades reflect that there will be 4"-6"+/- cut to the bottom of the concrete. Revise grading plan prior to building permit. 3 , Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 , 10/22/07 - WW For the eastern and western portions of the building on the north side, it appears that only a one-foot foundation landscape area is being provided. Request must include a reduction from five to one-foot. Justification must be provided. 9/25/07 - WW Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 -Foundation landscape area of five-foot width is not indicated on the north side of the building. Revise. 2 , 10/22/07 - W W Revise Sheet A2.1 east of lobby to the second floor east of the building to be consistent with that shown on Sheet C3.1. 9/25/07 - W W Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 -Landscape island at the northeast corner of the loading space and parking spaces east of such are inconsistent with that shown on Sheet A2.1. Revise. Revise Sheet L1.1 for the following: a. the plant code and quantity for the 5 HC indicated where the lobby is on the east side of the building should have the line indicating their location not at the handicap parking but to the interior landscape island on the north side of the building; b. if there is really aone-foot foundation landscape area on the east and west ends of the north side of the building, need to plant something in this area; c. remove proposed sod from the south side of the building from the loading space to the front property line and replace with shrubs and/or groundcover plants; d. need to plant the front of the retention pond along Magnolia Drive with shrubs and groundcovers, as this is a perimeter buffer (if you need a point of access to mow the grass, see if it can be on the east side of the pond); e. revise plant schedule counts as necessary to effect the above; f. revise in the Plant Schedule the size of the trees from 8-10' to 10' minimum for MB, QV, TD and UE; g. revise IN to either LM or Weeping Yaupon Holly for foundation trees on the north side of the building, as there is a pergola above these trees at a height of 10+ feet to the bottom of the beam (see Sheet A2.1). The trees suggested would better work with these pergolas; and h. In keeping with the street trees planted along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue by the Harbor Oaks Townhomes, it is recommended to plant street trees along this frontage of S. Ft. Harrison Avene at a spacing of 35 feet. Street trees to the north at the townhomes are live oaks. Parks and Recreation: 1 . 9/19/07 -Open space impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Note: Verification is needed as to building footprint of previous building(s) on site. P&R had verbally been informed in 8107 that there had been approximately 4900 sq ft, plans now reference 7,393 sq ft. Stormwater: No Comments Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 16 Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: No Comments Planning: 10/21/07 - ww Sheet C3.1 -Dimension the wider landscape island on east side of drive aisle east of the building and the landscape island south of the dumpster. 9/25/07 - ww Sheet C2.1 -Dimension the width of all landscape islands (interior and terminal islands). Landscape island on north. side of building is dimensioned at eight feet in width, but, by the scale of these plans, it is wider. Clarify. 10/21 /07 - W W The proposed building setback on the south side is 8.5 feet. Building Code requires the egress sidewalk from Stair #2 to be a minimum of 44-inches. Since the sidewalk is also a structure needing to meet setbacks, 8.5 - 3.67 means that the sidewalk is only 4.$3 feet from the south property line, which is not five feet, and it must be included in the request for reductions in the Site Data Table on Sheet C1.1 and in the written material as part of the application. Provide justification. 9/25/07- wW Sheet A2.1 indicates a stairwell with a required egress door on the south side of the building. Show on Sheet C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 the required egress sidewalk to the sidewalk within S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW. This reduces the required setback and required landscape buffer being provided on the south side of the property. Revise. .. 10/21/07 & 9/25/07 - WW Condition to be included in Staff Report: Prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title tying all property together (north and south of Magnolia Drive) be recorded in the public records. 1 . l 0/21 raj - ww Revise the Traffic Narrative regarding the requested reduction to the required stacking distance at the driveway. The stacking distance proposed is 26 feet, not 110 Feet. The 110 feet stacking distance does not relate to this Code requirement. Remove such reference to the 110-foot stacking distance. Please also revise the reference to location of the driveway at the greatest distance possible from the intersection, as it is not the greatest distance possible, which would line up with the easternmost north/south drive aisle. You might also want to make reference to the location of the Pinellas Trail. at the eastern end of this property, which has a stop sign a little to the east of the property, slowing traffic down, and that there is a parking lot for Marton Plant Hospital to the east of this property. While there is a driveway for this Morton Plant parking lot on Magnolia Drive, most people utilize Jeffords Street to access the driveway, as Jeffords has a traffic light at S.1?t. Harrison Avenue and employees work on shifts (where there is not constant traffic all day long). 9/26/07 - WW Section 3-1406.B.2 requires a minimum stacking distance of 40 feet between the Magnolia Drive property line and the first parking space or aisleway in the parking lot. Any reduction requires a traffic study justifying the reduction. 5 . Sheet C3.1 indicates alive-foot foundation landscaping along the north side of the building with a five-foot wide sidewalk adjacent, yet there is only afour-foot indentation of the building as evidenced by the architect's first floor plan Sheet A2.1. Sheet C3:1 and Sheet L1.1 do not show this one-foot area being landscaped (or being concreted). Coordinate/revise. if landscaped, show landscaping within this one-foot area and request a reduction to the foundation landscape area from five to one-foot as part of Comprehensive Landscape Program. If concreted, then need to request a foundation landscape area reduction from five to zero feet. If this one-foot area can be landscaped, prefer this option, 6 , Site and grading plans have been revised by relocating handicap parking spaces so as to not coincide with the unit entries, where there is a raised sidewalk (above the parking surface). Since this is the required access to the units, must install wheel stops for every parking space along the north side of the building to prevent vehicles overhanging the sidewalk. 7 . Revise Sheet A2.1 for parking row and landscaping east of the lobby to second floor to match Civil plans. 8 . Revise on Page 1 of the application Parcel Number 15/29/15/54450/034/0240 to 15/29/15/54450/032/0240. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 17 Other: ~~ No Comments Notes: "Application is sufficient to move forward to CDB. Submit 15 revised plan sets and resubmit by 10/15/07 for 11/20/07 CDB. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 18 ,t, Wells, Wayne From: Rickard, Leonard Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:06 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; 'James Miller'; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Shell, Heather C.; 'US Post Office (E-mail) ; Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: RE: CDB resubmittal for the November 20, 2007 Meeting Lenny Rickard Assistant Fire Marshal Clearwater Fire & Rescue 610 Frarilclin St., Clearwater, F133756 727-562-4327 Ext. 3078 Fax 727-562-4461 -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:13 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E-mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: FW: CDB resubmittal for the November 20, 2007 Meeting Importance: High I have placed 109 S McMullen Booth Road FLD2006-09049 on the back cabinet for your review. jRickard, Leonard) Met Thank you Sherry -----Original Message----- From.: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 Z:44 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; ]ames Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shelf, Heather C.; US Post Office (E-mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: CDB resubmittal for the November 20, 2007 Meeting Importance: High DRG Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 20, 2007 CDB Meeting: FLD2007-03007 699 Bay Esplanade The Channel Club Docks Planner: Scott Kurleman jRickard, Leonard] Met FLD2007-06024 1200 Rogers Street Missouri & Rogers Parking Lot Planner: Scott Kurleman jRickard, Leonard) Met FLD2007-09028 1001 S Fort Harrison Avenue Harbor Professional Center Planner: Wayne Wells jRickard, Leonard] Met I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (~'iease do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the C©B members Please review your commentslconditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Thursday October 18, 2007 by 4PM. Thank you • i i r` Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning department 72~-562-4582 « OLE Object: Facture (Metafile} » « OLE Object: Picture {Metafile) » \., - Wells, Wayne From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 4:36 PM To: Watkins, Sherry; Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; 'James Miller'; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; 'tJS Post Office (E-mail)'; Va, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: ~ RE: CDB resubmittal for the November 20, 2007 Meeting Engineering Dept. review of the following resubmittals is complete. Please refer to below: FLD2007-09049 109 McMullen Booth Rd. Stormwater Hold, otherwise approved. FLS2007-09043 2710 Gulf to Bay (to be changed to FLD2007-10031) Approved FLD2007-03007 699 Bay Esplanade The Channel Club Docks Planner: Scott Kurleman Approved . FLD2007-06024 1200 Rogers Street Missouri & Rogers Parking Lot Planner: Scott Kurleman Approved FLD2007-09028 1001 S Fort Harrison Avenue Harbor Professional Center Planner: Wayne Wells Approved -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 12:11 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; U5 Post OfF~ce (E-mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: 1=W: CDB resubmittal for the November 20, 2007 Meeting Importance: High Good Afternoon, FLS2007-09043 for 2710 Gulf to Bay has been change to FLD2007-10031 and has also been placed on the counter far your review. FYI I am changing the information and moving it from the FLS to the FLD today. Thank You, Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Pfanning Department TAT ~6z-45az -----Original Message----- From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October lb, 2007 8:43 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: CDB resubmittal for the November 20, 2007 Meeting Sherry -the FLS2007-09043 (2710 Gulf to Bay) is also for this CDB meeting. -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 2:44 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: CDB resubmittal for the November 20, 2007 Meeting l... .. Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 20, 2007 CDB Meeting: FLD2007-03007 699 Bay Esplanade The Channe6 Club Docks Planner: Scott Kurleman FLD2007-06024 1200 Rogers Street Missouri & Rogers Parking Lot Planner: Scott Kurleman FLD2007-09028 1001 S Fort Harrison Avenue Harbor Professional Center Planner: Wayne Wells I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the C[3B members Please review your comments/conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Thursday October 18, 2007 by 4PM. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 7~7-56~-458 « OLE Object: Picture (Metafile} » « OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) » Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 11:34 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; 'James Miller'; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; 'US Post Office (E-mail)'; Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: RE: CDB resubmittal for the November 20, 2007 Meeting 699 Bay Esplande- Condition applies for building permit. 1200 Rogers-No Issues. 1001 Ft Harrison- Updated conditions to be met at building permit. 2710 Guif to Bay-Conditions met. -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 2;44 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Offce (E-mail}; Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: CDB resubmittal for the November 20, 2007 Meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 20, 2007 CDB Meeting: FLD2007-03007 699 Bay Esplanade The Channel Club Docks Planner: Scott Kurleman FLD2007-06024 1200 Rogers Street Missouri & Rogers Parking Lot Planner. Scott Kurleman FLD2007-09028 1001 S Fort Harrison Avenue Harbor Professional Center Planner:~Wayne Wells I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review {Please do oat take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments/conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Thursday October 18, 2007 by 4PM. Thank you Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727 5b2-45B2 « OLE Object: Picture {Metafile) » « OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) » Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 2:44 PM To: Buzzell, William; Chase,. Susan; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; James Miller; Josuns, Sarah; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; US Post Office {E-mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: CDB resubmittal for the November 20, 2007 Meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the November 20, 2007 CDB Meeting: FLD2007-03007 699 Bay Esplanade The Channel Club Docks Planner: Scott Kurleman FLD2007-06024 1200 Rogers Street Missouri & Rogers Parking Lot Planner: Scott Kurleman FLD2007-09028 1001 S Fort Harrison Avenue Harbor Professional Center Planner: Wayne Wells I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed fpr the CDB members Please review your cammentslconditions for this cases in Permit Pian and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" ar still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed by Thursday October 18, 2007 by 4PM. Thank you Sherry Watkins ,gdrttinistrative Analyst Planning Department 727-562-4582 -~, 11:00 am Case Number: FLD2007-09028 -- 1001 S FT HARRISON AVE Owner(s): Fort Harrison Property Land Tr C/O Di Vello, Fulvio `I're Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Snkr I, Llc 1815 Health Care Drive Trinity, F133655 TELEPHONE: No Fhone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Housh Ghovaee F'N.l /o • !. a 7 Dec ~w1IN~ 1 300 S. Belcher Road Clearwater, F133765 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: renee@northsideengineering.cam Location: 1.27 total acres located at the southeast corner of South Ft. Harrison Avenue and Magnolia Drive and on the north side of Magnolia Drive approximately 3,50 east of South Ft. Harrison Avenue adjacent to the west side of the Pinellas Trail Atlas Page: 295E Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development to permit 21,000 square feet offices and medical clinics in the Commercial (C) (south side of Magnolia Drive) and the Office {O} (north side of Magnolia Drive) Districts with a reduction to the front (west along South Ft. Harrison Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building and pavement), a reduction to the front (north along Magnolia Drive) from 25 feet to 7.5 feet {to pavement), reductions to the side (south} setback from 10 feet to 7.5 feet (ta building) and to 6.5 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and to 6.5 feet (to dumpster enclosure and pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and a reduction to the front perimeter buffer along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 7.5 feet and a reduction to the foundation landscaping requirement along the north side of the building from five to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Neighborhood Assoc Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33756 320 Magnolia Drive TELEPHONE: 461-9657, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Steve Doherty, Rick Albee, Jim Keller Applicant: Renee Ruggiero, John Buscema, James Evans, Bi11 Fisher The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 15 t Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. Show on the plan how a delivery truck will be able to access the loading space. Prior to issuance of a Building Peanut: 1. Show a 4-foot wide sidewalk to be installed on Magnolia Street frontage. 2. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of--way shall be a minimum. 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. (Applicant shall include City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #103, page 2/2 with the plans). 3. Because the occupancy of the proposed building is a medical office, the applicant/owner will be responsible for all associated fees for a required reduced pressure B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). 4. Ductile iron pipe shall be used from tap on main to the backflow prevention device. 5. Applicant shall pay all applicable sewer and water impact fees. 6. Show on the plan a double sweep clean-out for the sanitary sewer lateral and include Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Detail #305, pg. 1/3 on the plans. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 2. All unused drive aprons and/or parking surfaces shall be removed entirely by the contractor, at the applicant's expense. Adjacent street right(s)-of--way are to be restored with new sidewalk and • sod as required. 3. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues. 1Fire: 1 . Sheet needs to be Relabeled from "new class 1 standpipe" to Fire Department Connection and move to Ft Harrison side of building for tactical purposes. Also add a fire hydrant on to Ft Harrison side for FDC use. Show PRIOR TO CDB 2 . Provide turnaround in accordance with NFPA 1 Chapter 18 in southeast parking lot area. As shown now provides a deadend that is longer than allowed.Show PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: , 1 . No issues. Land Resources: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 16 t 1 . Tt appears that no consideration was given to preserving trees, modifications must be made to preserve tree #30. Consult with your arborist to review potential plan modifications and preservation techniques to preserve this tree prior to CDB. 2 . Show tree #30, 36" live oak, on all civil and landscape plans prior to CDB. 3 . Revise the storm to be outside the canopy of tree #30 prior to CDB. 4 . Parking should be placed "On Grade" with an aeration system at tree #30. Provide prior to CDB. 5 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan. prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits {2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: a Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and Ll . l -Foundation landscape area of five-foot width is not indicated on the north side of the building. Revise. +~ 2 . Sheet C2.1 -Interior landscape islands must be a minimum of eight feet inside curbing. Unclear is dimensions are to inside or outside of curbing. Clarify. ~ 3 . Sheet L1.1 - A southern live oak tree is indicated to be planted within the small landscape island on the northeast side of the loading space. This island is too small to provide sufficient growth area for this type of tree. Revise. 1 4 . Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 -Wheel stops are not required. for parking spaces that don't abut landscape area, such as the interior parking spaces east of the building. Suggest removing these wheel stops. ~5 Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 -Landscape island at the northeast comer of the loading space and parking spaces east of such are inconsistent with that shown on Sheet A2.1. Revise. ~ 6 . Comprehensive Landscape Program application - Exhibit A indicates a number of buffer reductions that are unnecessary. Buffers required are 15 feet along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue {provided), 10 feet along Magnolia Drive (proposal is to reduce to 7.5 feet) and fve feet along the south and east property lines (these abut nonresidential uses and plan meets and exceeds such -except if required egress sidewalk is shown on south side of building to sidewalk within S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW). Request does not include any reduction to foundation landscaping along north side of building (unclear why such cannot be provided). North side of Magnolia'Drive - A 10-foot wide buffer is required along the south side of this portion of the property and afive-foot wide buffer is required on the other three sides. Section 3-1202.D.2 states "Front slopes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up tv 50 percent of any required landscape buffer width, provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six inches-below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet in width." Need to provide such buffers, including such shrubs and trees as required. ~7 . Sheet C2.1 - A 10-foot wide landscape buffer is required to be provided along Magnolia Drive. Cannot -count any of this 10-foot buffer as interior landscaping. . ~Ig , Sheet L1.1 -Must plant the southern buffer with trees, shrubs and groundeovers in accordance with Code requirements (one shade tree per each 35 feet; two accent trees =one shade tree; three clustered palms =one shade tree). 9 . Sheet L1.1 - I only fmd 490 DV, not 493 DV. Revise. ~ 10 . Sheet Ll .l -Since the plan indicates the amount of PA on the southern portion of the property, what amount of PA is necessary for the northern (retention pond) portion of the property? ~ 11 . Tree Inventory Sheet - Legend indicates by highlighting the trees to be removed. My sheet is not hightlighted, so I cannot tell which trees are being retained. Highlighting is not an acceptable means of indicating such, as it will not microfilm. Find anothex way of indicating whether a tree will be removed or preserved. Revise. 12 . Sheet L1.1 -Easternmost interior landscape island is being counted as interior landscape coverage (see Sheet C2.1) but does not include any required trees. Revise. Parks and Recreation: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 17 .~ 9/19107 -Open space impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permit or fatal plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-Sb2-4824 to calculate the assessment, Note: Verification is needed as to building footprint of previous building(s) on site. P&R had verbally been informed in 8/07 that there had been approximately 4900 sq ft, plans now reference 7,393 sq ft. Stormwater: The following shall be addressed prior to CDB. 1. Proposed smartbox shall not be located in City of Clearwater street right-of--way. 2. Provide minimum clearance of 3 feet between the top of bank and all property lines. The following shall be addressed prior to building permit. 1. Show on grading plan the location of the underdrain system. 2. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption. 3. Show gutter system routing roof runoff to the storm system. 4. All grate inlets that will be exposed to traffic shall be specified to have traffic bearing capacity and the detail shall be included in the detail sheet. 5. City of Clearwater has requested LA Engineering, the engineering company for the 407 S Fort Harrison, to change 12" HDPE to 12" Contech 2000 pipe. The change in pipe material may impact applicant's proposed stormwater design. Applicant shall contact LA Engineering to obtain the revised plan. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building pemut application, applicant shall submit all data again for review Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . Re-design loading space so that the user can maneuver in and out of the loading space with out obstruction. Also provide a 24' wide backout space for the loading zone. 2. Handicap ramps are not properly located on sidewalk in front of building; relocate as necessary to eliminate conflicts with building entrances. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing, General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Perrrtit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 18 _A ~ ] . From a functionality standpoint, the loading area is nonfunctional, as it has been placed in the most inaccessible location for trucks to get to and out of it. ~ 2 . Building floor plans submitted by Fisher and Associates don't match that depicted on the civil .plans. Revise. ~3 . Since building floor plans don't match civil plans, unclear whether there is an issue for handicap accessibility into the building, as Sheet C2.1 indicates a flat area of the sidewalk at the same elevation as the parking surface with ramps up on either side of the handicap access aisles. Grading on Sheet C3.1 does not help with such determination. Revise. ~4 . Building dimensions on Sheet C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 don't match that indicated on Sheet A2.1. Revise. / 5 . Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 -Provide building dimension on east side of building where property line turns northward. ~. Sheet C2.1 -Dimension the width of all landscape islands {interior and temunal islands). Landscape island on north side of building is dimensioned at eight feet in width, but, by the scale of these plans, it is wider. Clarify. Q, Sheet A2.1 indicates a stairwell with a required egress door on the south side of the building. Show on Sheet C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 the required egress sidewalk to the sidewalk within S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW. This reduces the required setback and required landscape buffer being provided on the south side of the property. Revise. $~ Condition to be included in Staff Report: Prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title tying all property together {north and south of Magnolia Drive) be retarded in the public records. ~ 9 . Update the survey to include the lot on the north side of Magnolia Drive. X10 . If any freestanding sign(s) is desired, need to show the location(s) (with setback of a minimum of five feet to any property line) on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1. Need to coordinate with proposed landscaping to avoid shielding of sign(s). 111. Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 -Need to show the required visibility triangle at the street intersection. 1~ Section 3-1406.B.2 requires a minimum stacking distance of 40 feet between the Magnolia Drive property line and the first parking space or aisleway in the parking lot. Any reduction requires a traffic study justifying the reduction. . ~13 . Sheet C1.1 -Revise Site Data Table for the following: a. Usage -Proposed and Required for southern parcel is not "mixed use". b. Building coverage -Proposed is 10,500 sf, not 21,000 (which is GFA) and percentage is 18.99%, not 37.9%. c. Proposed side setbacks -south setback to building is 7.5 feet, not 8.5 feet; east setback to building is 7.0 feet, not 186 feet. d. Building Height - The proposed building is not 25 feet tall. Building plans on Sheet A4.1 don't indicate the height of the building to the roof deck, the height of the parapet, the height of the roofed structure in the center of the building on the north side nor the height of the architectural tower on the northwest corner of the building. Once building heights are dimentioned by the architect, revise appropriately. Indicate all heights. e. Paved vehicular use area {VTJA) -Proposed VUA includes sidewalk, which it shouldn't. It is assumed the sidewalk square footage indicated is for the sidewalk on the north side of the building, which is not "vehicular" use area, where vehicles drive. f. Impervious Surface Ratio -The proposed ratio should be 0.764, not 0.76 (see comment "g" below). g. Open Space -Proposed South Parcel is not 17,646 square feet of open space. If the lot size is 49,277 sf and the impervious area is 37,649 sf, subtracting the impervious area from the lot area should produce 11,628 sf (23.6%). Proposed Total should be 11,628 sf + 6,018 sf = 17,646 sf (32%). j 14 . Sheet C1.1 -Project site map and aerial must be revised to include the parcel an the north side of Magnolia Drive. ~ 15 . Sheet C 1.1 -Information regarding "survey information" in bottom left corner is inaccurate, based on the survey submitted (which needs to be redone because it is doesn't include all property). f 16 . Revise Page 1 of the application to include Parcel Number 15/29f 15/54450/034/0110. ~ 17 . Provide the original signed and notarized Affidavit to Authorize Agent (Page 8 of application). 118. Sheet C2.1 _ Add a note on the plan stating all utility lines on-site will be placed underground. Additionally, must underground the utility lines within the Magnolia Drive right-of--way. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 19 _R 19 . Sheet A4.1 -Provide dimension for the following: a. height of the building from grade to the top of the roof deck; b. height of the parapet from top of the roof deck to the top of the parapet. A separate dimension must be provided from the top of the roof deck to the top of the roofed structure in the center of the north side of the building; c. height of the towers from top of the roof deck to the top of the pitched roof. ~ 20 . Sheet A4.1 -Indicate on the plans, potentially through a legend, the proposed colors of the various exterior portions of the building on all sides. Also, provide one copy of color chips/samples of the exterior colors. ~~21 . Sheet A4.1 -Dimension on the plans the distance the eave projects from the face of the building. J 22 . Revise Page 1 of the application far "Proposed Use(s)" to indicate "Medical Offces & Medical Clinics." 23 . As part of the application, revise the Description of Request to indicate the reductions to setbacks and landscape buffers, as well as height increases, referenced in other DRC comments. ~ 24 . Response to General Applicability criteria #1 -Revise response to provide justification as to HOW the request is harmonious with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and. character of the adjacent properties, including speciFc information on those adjacent properties you are claiming consistency with (such as setbacks, height, etc.). Revise last statement relative to "in an area which prohibits on-street parking", as all areas of the City do not permit the provision of on-street 1 parking to meet parking requirements. 25 . Response to General Applicabifity criteria #4 -Survey indicates two existing driveways on S. Ft. Harrison Avenue (not one). Revise. 26 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 -Unclear why required setbacks cannot be met. The standards for offices require a minimum lot width of 100 feet and. a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet. For medical clinics, a minimum lot width. of 100 feet and 20,000 square feet is required. Both of these standards are being exceeded. Potentially the amount of square footage is too much or the building design is creating issues for setbacks. Revise response or revise site building design. 127. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 -Response refers to the Downtown Plan, which this site is not located within, and refers to the Downtown District (zoning), which it is also not located within. Unclear as to references to the Downtown Plan and zoning. Revise. J 2$ . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 -Response refers to the Downtown Plan, which this site is not located within. Unclear as to references to the Downtown Plan. Need to address this proposal and HOW it relates to the surrounding area. Should include references to recent and approved changes for the surrounding area, especially to the north. Revise. 29 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 -Expand response #o speak to this site's proximity to the hospital and medical offices and medical clinics within this "hospital" area. f 30 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 -Explain HOW this proposal is compatible with adjacent uses and HOW it relates to the surrounding area character. ,I 31 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - a. Provide response as to HOW this proposal, with its reduced setbacks, will comply with this criteria; b. An appropriate response to this criteria is that there are no adopted applicable design guidelines for this area; c. Provide a response as to HOW this proposal's reduced setbacks supports the established or emerging pattern for this area; d. Provide a response as to HOW this proposal's reduced setbacks complies with the criteria stated; and e. Provide an appropriate response (none provided). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 20 ~32 . The building is deemed to have a flat roof as the main roof. Need to dimension the building elevation with the height from grade to the top of the main roof. Need to also provide a dimension from the main roof deck to the top of the parapets, to the top of the the architectural roof in the center of the north side of the building and to the top of the architectural tower on the northwest corner of the building (as well as the tower over the elevator). Application will need to include as part of the request height increases for the main flat roof (if greater than 25 feet), from the top of the main flat roof for parapets (if more than 42 inches from the top of the roof deck), to the top of the architectural roof in the center of the north side of the building (from top of main flat roof) and to the top of the architectural tower on the northwest corner of the building (from top of main flat root). 33 . Amend the responses to the General. Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to address proposed increases to building height. Other: No Comments Notes: Application is sufficient to move forward to CDB. Submit 15 revised plan sets and resubmit by 10/15/07 for 11/20/07 CDB. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 21 l 4 t 11.00 am Case Number: FLD2007-09028 -- 1001 S FT HARRISON AVE ~ o Qwner{s}: Fort Harrison Property Land Tr ~a • • C/O Di Vello, Fulvio Tre Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Sn1a' I, Llc 1815 Health Care Drive ~ ~ ~~ Trmity,F133655 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Roush Ghovaee 300 S. Belcher Road Clearwater, F133765 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: renee@northsideengineering.com Location: 1.27 total acres located at the southeast corner of South Ft. Harrison Avenue and Magnolia Drive and on the north side of Magnolia Drive approximately 350 east of South Ft. Harrison Avenue adjacent to the west side of the Pinellas Trail Atlas Page: 295B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request:. Flexible Development to permit 21,000 square feet offices and medical clinics in the Commercial (C) (south side of Magnolia Drive) and the Office (O) (north side of Magnolia Drive) Districts with a reduction to the front (west along South Ft. Harrison Avenue} setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building and pavement), a reduction to the front (north along Magnolia Drive) from 25 feet to 7.5 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side {south} setback from 10 feet. to 7.5 feet {to building) and to 6.5 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the side (east) setback from. 10 feet to seven feet (to building) and to 6.5 feet (to dumpster enclosure and pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and a reduction to the front perimeter buffer along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 7.5 feet and a reduction to the foundation landscaping requirement along the north side of the building from five to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Neighborhood Assoc Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 320 Magnolia Drive TELEPHONE: 461-9657, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Rick Albee, Lenny Rickard Applicant: Doreen Williams The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering:. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 15 Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. Show on the plan how a delivery truck will be able to access the loading space. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Show a 4-foot wide sidewalk to be installed on Magnolia Street frontage. 2. Any new concrete driveway aprons} constructed within the right-of--way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. (Applicant shall include City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #103, page 2/2 with the plans). 3. Because the occupancy of the proposed building is a medical office, the applcantlowner will be responsible for all associated fees for a required reduced pressure B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). 4. Ductile iron pipe shall be used from tap on main to the backflow prevention device. 5. Applicant shall pay all applicable sewer and water impact fees. 6. Show on the plan a double sweep clean-out for the sanitary sewer lateral and include Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Detail #305, pg: 1/3 on the plans. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent. to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 2. All unused. drive aprons and/or parking surfaces shall be removed entirely by the contractor, at the applicant's expense. Adjacent street right(s)-of--way are to be restored with new sidewalk and sod as required. 3. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and. hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming. upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues. Fire: 1 . Sheet needs to be Relabeled from "new class 1 standpipe" to Fire Department Connection and move to Ft Harrison side of building for tactical purposes. Also add a fire hydrant on to Ft Harrison side for FDC-use. Show PRIOR TO CDB 2 . Provide turnaround in accordance with NFPA 1 Chapter 18 in southeast parking lot area. As shown now provides a deadend that is longer than allowed,Show PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 , No issues. Land Resources: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 16 i 1 . It appears that no consideration was given to preserving trees, modincations must be made to preserve tree #30. Consult with your arborist to review potential plan modifications and preservation techniques to preserve this tree prior to CDB. 2 . Show tree #30, 36" live oak, on all civil and landscape plans prior to CDB. 3 . Revise the storm to be outside the canopy of tree #30 prior to CDB. 4 . Parking should be placed "On Grade" with an aeration system at tree #30. Provide prior to CDB. 5 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. . Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 . Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 -Foundation landscape area of five-foot width is not indicated on the north side of the building. Revise. 2 . Sheet C2.1 -Interior landscape islands must be a minimum of eight feet inside curbing. Unclear is dimensions are to inside or outside of curbing. Clarify. 3 . Sheet L 1.1 - A southern live oak tree is indicated to be planted within the small landscape island on the northeast side of the loading space. This island is too small to provide sufficient growth area for this type of tree. Revise. 4 . Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 -Wheel stops are not required for parking spaces that don't abut landscape area, such as the interior parking spaces east of the building. Suggest removing these wheel stops. 5 . Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 -Landscape island at the northeast corner of the loading space and parking spaces east of such are inconsistent with that shown on Sheet A2.1. Revise. (, Comprehensive Landscape Program application - Exhibit A indicates a number of buffer reductions that are unnecessary. Buffers required are 15 feet along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue (provided}, 10 feet along Magnolia Drive (proposal is to reduce to 7.5 feet) and five feet along the south and east property lines {these abut nonresidential uses and plan meets and exceeds such -except if required egress sidewalk is shown on south side of building to sidewalk within S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW). Request does not include any reduction to foundation landscaping along north side of building (unclear why such cannot be provided). North side of Magnolia Drive - A 10-foot wide buffer is required along the south side of this portion of the property and afive-foot wide buffer is required on the other three sides. Section 3-1202.D.2 states "Front slopes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50 percent of any required landscape buffer width, provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six inches below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet in width." Need to provide such buffers, including such shrubs and trees as required. 7 . Sheet C2.1 - A 10-foot wide landscape buffer is required to be provided along Magnolia Drive. Cannot count any of this 10-foot buffer as interior landscaping. g . Sheet Ll. l -Must plant the southern buffer with trees, shrubs and groundcovers in accordance with Code requirements (one shade tree per each 35 feet; two accent trees =one shade tree; three clustered palms =one shade tree). 9 . Sheet L1.1 - I only fmd 490 DV, not 493 DV. Revise. 10 . Sheet L 1.1 -Since the plan indicates the amount of PA on the southern portion of the property, what amount of PA is necessary for the northern (retention pond) portion of the property? 11 . Tree Inventory Sheet - Legend indicates by highlighting the trees to be removed. My sheet is not hightlighted, so I cannot tell which trees are being retained. Highlighting is not an acceptable means of indicating such, as it will not microfilm. Find another way of indicating whether a tree will be removed or preserved. Revise. 12 . Sheet L1.1 -Easternmost interior landscape island is being counted as interior landscape coverage (see Sheet C2.1) but does not include any required trees. Revise. Parks and Recreation: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 17 9/19/07 -Open space impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permit or fnal plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Note: Verification is needed as to building footprint of previous building(s) on site. P&R had verbally been informed in 8/07 that there had been approximately 4900 sq ft, plans now reference 7,393 sq ft. Stormwater: 1 . The following shall be addressed prior to CDB. 1. Proposed smartbox shall not be located in City of Clearwater right-of--way. 2. Provide minimum clearance of 3 feet between the top of bank and the right-of--way. The following shall be addressed prior to building permit. 1. Show on grading plan the location of the underdrain system. 2. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption. 3. Show gutter system routing roof runoff to the storm system. 4. All grate inlets that will be exposed to traffic shall be specified to have traffic bearing capacity and the detail shall be included in the detail sheet. 5. City of Clearwater has requested LA Engineering, the engineering company for the 907 S Fort Harrison, to change 12" HDPE to 12" Contech 2000 pipe. As this revision may change the invert elevation of the pipe that the proposed project ties into. Applicant is to contact LA Engineering to obtain the revised plan. Generai note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2: At building permit application, applicant shall submit all data again for review Solid Waste: No Comments Traff c Engineering: 1 , Re-design loading space so that the user can maneuver in and out of the loading space with out obstruction. Also provide a 24' wide backout space for the loading zone. 2. Handicap ramps are not properly located on sidewalk in front of building; relocate as necessary to eliminate conflicts with building entrances. . The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 18 1 . From a functionality standpoint, the loading area is nonfunctional, as ~t has been placed in the mast inaccessible location for trucks to get to and out of it. 2 . Building floor plans submitted by Fisher and Associates don't match that depicted on the civil plans. Revise. 3 . Since building floor plans don't match civil plans, unclear whether there is an issue for handicap accessibility into the building, as Sheet C2.1 indicates a flat area of the sidewalk at the same elevation as the parking surface with ramps up on either side of the handicap access aisles. Grading on Sheet C3.1 does not help with such determination. Revise. 4 . Building dimensions on Sheet C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 don't match that indicated on Sheet A2.1. Revise. 5 . Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and. L1.1 -Provide building dimension on east side of building where property line turns northward. b . Sheet C2.1 -Dimension the width of all landscape islands (interior and terminal islands). Landscape island on north side of building is dimensioned at eight feet in width, but, by the scale of these plans, it is wider. Clarify. 7 . Sheet A2.1 indicates a stairwell with a required egress door on the south side of the building. Show on Sheet C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 the required egress sidewalk to the sidewalk within S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW. This reduces the required setback and required landscape buffer being provided on the south side of the property. Revise. $ . Condition to be included in Staff Report: Prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title tying all property together (north and south of Magnolia Drive) be recorded in the public records. 9 . Update the survey to include the lot on the north side of Magnolia Drive. 10 . If any freestanding sign(s) is desired, need to show the locations} (with setback of a minimum of five feet to any property line) on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1. Need to coordinate with proposed landscaping to avoid shielding of sign{s}. 11 . Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 -Need to show the required visibility triangle at the street intersection. 12 . Section 3-1406.B.2 requires a minimum stacking distance of 40 feet between the Magnolia Drive property line and the first parking space or aisleway in the parking lot. Any reduction requires a traffic study justifying the reduction. 13 . Sheet C1.1 -Revise Site Data Table for the following: a. Usage -Proposed and Required for southern parcel is not "mixed use". b. Building coverage -Proposed is 10,500 sf, not 21,000 (which is GFA) and percentage is 18.99°1°, not 37.9%. c. Proposed side setbacks -south setback to building is 7.5 feet, not 8.5 feet; east setback to building is 7.0 feet, not 186 feet. d. Building Height - The proposed. building is not 25 feet tall. Building plans on Sheet A4.1 don't indicate the height of the building to the roof deck, the height of the parapet, the height of the roofed structure in the center of the building on the north side nor the height of the architectural tower on the northwest corner of the building. Once building heights are dimentioned by the architect, revise appropriately. Indicate all heights. e. Paved vehicular use area {WA) -Proposed ViJA includes sidewalk, which it shouldn't. It is assumed the sidewalk square footage indicated is for the sidewalk on the north side of the building, which is not "vehicular" use area, where vehicles drive. f. Impervious Surface Ratio -The proposed ratio should be 0.764, not 0.76 (see comment "g" below). g. Open Space -Proposed South Parcel is not 17,646 square feet of open space. If the lot size is 49,277 sf and the impervious area is 37,649 sf, subtracting the impervious area. from the lot area should produce 11,628 sf (23.6%). Proposed Total should be 11,628 sf + 6,01.8 sf = 17,646 sf (32%). 14 . Sheet C1.1 -Project site map and aerial must be revised to include the parcel an the north side of Magnolia Drive. 15 . Sheet C 1.1 -Information regarding °survey information" in bottom left corner is inaccurate, based on the survey submitted (which needs to be redone because it is doesn't include all property). 16 . Revise Page 1 of the application to include Parcel Number 15/29/15/54450/034/0110. 17 . Provide the original signed and notarized Affidavit to Authorize Agent (Page 8 of application). 18 . Sheet C2.1 - Add a note on the plan stating all utility lines on-site will be placed underground. Additionally, must underground the utility lines within the Magnolia Drive right-of--way. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 19 19 . Sheet A4.1 -Provide dimension for the following: a. height of the building from grade to the top of the roof deck; b. height of the parapet from top of the roof deck to the top of the parapet. A separate dimension must be provided from the top of the roof deck to the tap of the roofed. structure in the center of the north side of the building; c. height of the towers from top of the roof deck to the top of the pitched roof. 20 . Sheet A4.1 -Indicate on the plans, potentially through a legend, the proposed colors of the various exterior portions of the building on all sides. Also, provide one copy of color chips/samples of the exterior colors. 21 . Sheet A4.1 -Dimension on the plans the distance the eave projects from the face of the building. 22 . Revise Page 1 of the application for'°Proposed Use(s)" to indicate "Medical Offices & Medical Clinics." 23 . As part of the application, revise the Description of Request to indicate the reductions to setbacks and landscape buffers, as well as height increases, referenced in other DRC comments. 2~1 . Response to General Applicability criteria #1 -Revise response to provide justification as to HOW the request is harmonious with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties, including specific information on those adjacent properties you are claiming consistency with (such as setbacks, height, etc.). Revise last statement relative to "in an area which prohibits on-street parking", as all areas of the City do not permit the provision of on-street parking to meet parking requirements. 25 . Response to General Applicability criteria #4 -Survey indicates two existing driveways on S. Ft. Harrison Avenue (not one}. Revise. 26 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 -Unclear why required setbacks cannot be met. The standards for offices require a minimum lot width of 100 feet and a minimum Iot area of 10,000 square feet. For medical clinics, a minimum lot width of 100 feet and 20,000 square feet is required. Both of these standards are being exceeded. Potentially the amount of square footage is too much. or the building design is creating issues for setbacks. Revise response or revise.site/building design. 27 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 -Response refers to the Downtown Plan, which this site is not located within, and refers to the Downtown District (zoning), which it is also not located within. Unclear as to references to the Downtown. Plan and zoning. Revise. 28 . Response to Comprehensive InfiIl Redevelopment Project criteria #3 -Response refers to the Downtown Plan, which this site is not located within. Unclear as to references to the Downtown Plan. Need to address this proposal and HOW it relates to the surrounding area. Should include references to recent and approved changes for the surrounding area, especially to the north. Revise. 29 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 -Expand response to speak to this site's proximity to the hospital and medical offices and medical clinics within this "hospital" area. 30 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 -Explain HOW this proposal is compatible with adjacent uses and HOW it relates to the surrounding area character. 31 . Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - a. Provide response as to HOW this proposal, with its reduced setbacks, will comply with this criteria; b. An appropriate response to this criteria is that there are no adopted applicable design guidelines for this area; c. Provide a response as to HOW this proposal's reduced setbacks supports the established or emerging pat#ern for this area; d. Provide a response as to HOW this proposal's reduced setbacks complies with the criteria stated; and e. Provide an appropriate response {none provided). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 20 32 . The building is deemed to have a flat roof as the main roof, Need to aunension the building elevation with the height from grade to the top of the main roof. Need to also provide a dimension from the main roof deck to the top of the parapets, to the top of the the architectural roof in the center of the north side of the building and to the top of the architectural tower on the northwest comer of the building (as well as the tower over the elevator). Application will need to include as part of the request height increases for the main flat roof (if greater than 25 feet}, from the top of the main flat roof for parapets (if more than 42 inches from the top of the roof deck), to the tap of the architectural roof in the center of the north side of the building (from top of main flat roof) and to the top of the architectural tower on the northwest corner of the building (from top of main flat roof). 33 . Amend the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to address proposed increases to building height. Other: No Comments Notes: Application is insufficient to move forward to CDB. Revise submittal plans and resubmit for additional DRC review {see schedule for dates for resubmittal}. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, October 4, 2007 -Page 21 Community- Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Gase No. -~L~ Zao2_ ~~ ~~ Meeting Date: J~~'-` ~ Za-~ 7 0 Location: 1 ~ ~ S ~ ~-r-x~6z.~2.c~Q-,N F1u~ - ^ Current Use: "~/~+~~~ ^ Active Cade Enforcement Case (noyesJ OU"~6L~~~~ ^ Address number (yes) (no) ant land) ^ Landscaping (yes} o) ^ Overgrown yes) (no) ^ Debris (yes) no) ^ Inoperative vehicle{s) (yes no) ^ Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor (vacant land) ^ Fencing one (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ^ Paint (good) (fair) (poor) (garish) ^ Grass Parking (yes) (no ^ Residential Parking Violations (yes) (no) Q Signage one (ok) (not ok) (billboard) ^ Parkin n/a striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) ^ Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) ^ Outdoor storage (ye ) (no) Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date: ~ ,~ Reviewed by: G v~/~ Telephony: c~~v~' T ~ Revised 3-2 -01; 02-04-03 r, r ` ~.vww.sunbiz.org - Departmen" `State ~.r~..~..m.~ ,.._. ._ _ _ Home Contact Us E-Filing Services Page 1 of 2 ~. - k ~_~ a 1~k.~..3.~~> Document Searches Forms H Previous on List No Events Next on List No Name His#ory Return To List _~,__ _ ~. Entiry,;Narrie Sears detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liabilit Com an SNKR I, LLC Flin Information Document Number L05000016191 FEI Number 432074811 Date Filed 02/16/2005 State FL Status ACTIVE Princi al Address 1815 HEALTHCARE DRIVE TRINITY FL 34655 Mailing Address 1815 HEALTHCARE DRIVE TRINITY FL 34655 Re istered A ent Name & Address PATEL, SHODHAN 19103 AVENUE BAYONNES LUTZ FL 33549 US ManagerlMember Detail Name & Address Title MGRM PATEL, SHODHAN 19103 AVENUE BAYONNES LUTZ FL 33549 Title MGRM KHANT,RANCHHOD 50 BAHAMA CIRCLE TAMPA FL 33606 Title MGRM PATEL, KRUTIKA httpa/www.sunbiz.org/scriptsfcordet.exe?action=DETFIL&incLdoc number=Lfl50flflfl161... 9/26/2007 ,ti _~ - ~ ~~www.sunbiz.org - Departmen"' r State ~ Page 2 of 2 4' 19103 AVENUE BAYONNES LUTZ FL 33549 Title MGRM KHANT, SAROJ 50; BAHAMA CIRCLE TAMPA FL 33606 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2008 04/14/2006 2007 03/08/2007 Document Images 03/08/2007 --ANNUAL REPORT 04114/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT Q2/~ 6120..0...5__-- .Florida.,_Lirn,ited....Lia,~i.l,ity ~ Note: This is not official record. See documents if question or conflict. ~ Home Contact us document Searches i=-Filing Services Forms Help Copyright and Privacy Polici~:s Copyright ~) 2007 State of Florida, Department of State. http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet. exe?action=DETFIL&incLdoc_number=L05 0000161... 9/26/2007 r '';'~nellas County Property Appr~ ~~er Information: 15 29 15 54450 032 0? "'~ Page 2 of S r 1~ ~ 29 ~ ~5 I ~4~~~ 1~ 034 ~ Q~~O 26-Sep-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:02:45 Ownership information Uacant Property Use and Sales S N K R I LLC OBK: 15942 OPG: 1401 1815 HEALTH CARE OR TRINITY FL 34655 EVAC; Hon-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr; 0 of Jan 1, 2007, based an Census Tract: 259.02 l f 2005 - 2006 sa es rom : 0 ' Sale Date OF2 BovklPage Price {Qual{UnQ} Vac{Imp Plat Informatian 8 12,007 15,94211,401 1,325,000 ~M} U 1914: Book 003 Pgs 043- 2 12,D05 14,143} 821 1,300,000 {M} I 1913: Book 001 Pgs 070- D {0 O1 0 0 { } 0000: 'Book Pgs - p {0 D/ D 0 { ) 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS JustlMarket; 216,3DD Homestead: NO Ownership ~ .DOD Govt Exem: HO Use ~: ,p00 AssessedlCap; 216,30D Institutional Exem: HO Tax Exempt ~: .OOD Historic Exem; 0 Taxable: 216,300 Agricultural; 0 2007 Tax Informatian District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax; 4,879,49 Land Size Unit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: 4,312.41 Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1} 1.08 x 135 18. 00 14, 656. 23 S 07 Spec Rsmt: , 00 2} 0 x 0 . 00 . OD 3} D x 0 . 00 . DO LJithout the Save-Our-Haines 4} D x D .DD .OD cap, 2007 taxes will be : 5} 0 x D .00 .00 4, 312.41 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . QO lJithout any exemptions,. 2007 taxes will be 4, 31 2.41 Short Legal MAGNOLIA PARK BLK 34, L OTS i AHD 2 Description Building Information http://136.174.1 $7.13/htbinlcgi-click?o=1&a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/200'7 ,_ ~~,inellas County Property Appr- `per Information: 15 29 15 54450 032 0? "`~ ~5 I 29 / 15 ~ 54450 ,~ 034 f 0010 Page 3 of 5 26-yep-2007 Jirn Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 18:02:45 Vacant Parcel Property Use, 000 Land Use: iD vacant Extra F~ea-tur~s Descriptian Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} , 00 0 D D D 2} .00 0 0 D D 5} .00 0 D D D q) .00 D 0 0 0 5} .00 0 0 D 0 6) .00 0 0 D 0 TOTAL RECORO VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ®~®® http:// 136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c-1 &r=.16&s=4&t3-1 &u=0&p-1... 9/26/2007 ~, Pinellas County Property App•-~~er Information: 15 29 15 54450 032 0'>"n ~~ A ~l ~ iAII~E ~ ~ L ti ~`~`~ T ARRI~t~N '~` 1-T ~ HAF?RI~Qty ELI . ~L~S ~T HAPR I ax~l'~! MAC ~LIR NWF~R~~ ~~~ ~13Q IS~~s~ LOTUS L~TU~ ~"T PATH PATH ARRISQN H L~~US N~.F~R PATH 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) httpa/136.174:187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &t=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1 Page 4 of 5 9/26/2007 .P4ne11as County Property Appr-~~er Information: 15 29 15 54450 032 0'^~ Page 5 ofS a Pinellas Coun Pro ert A raiser ~:z"' .~~`~~~ tY P Y PP ~~:`.~~ Parcei Information ~-r~' _ http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 ~ ,,Pinellas County Property Appr•-'~er Information: 15 29 15 54454 034 O(~' ~ Page 2 of 5 ~5 1 29 11~ 15440 ~ ~~4 1 044 ?6-Sep-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Praperty Appraiser 18:03:12 Ownership Information Vacant Praperty Use and Sales S H K R I LLC OBK: 1594? DPG: 1401 1815 HEALTH CARE DR TRINITY FL 34655 EVAC: Hon-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: ?59.0? sales from POD5 - 2006: 0 Sale Date DR Book}Page Price {Qual}UnQ) Vac}Imp Plat Information 8 }2,007 15,942#1,401 1,3?5,000 {Fi) V 1914: Book OD3 Pgs 043- 2 }?,005 14,143# 921 1,300,000 {M) I 1913: Boak 001 Pgs 070- 0 }1,972 3,89?# 98 15,000 {Q~ I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 }0 0# 0 0 { ) 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just}Market: 107,600 Hamestead: HO Ownership ~ .000 Govt Exem: HO Use ~; .000 Assessed}Cap: 107,600 Institutional Exem: HD Tax Exempt ~: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable; 107,600 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax: 2,426,69 Land Size Unit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: 2,145.24 Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1) 54 x 135 18.00 7, ?90.00 5 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Clur-Horner 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 2, 145.24 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be ; 2, 145. 24 Short Legal HAGHOLIA PARK BLlC 34, LOT 3 Description Building Information httpa/136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1&a=1&b =1&c=1&r=.16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p=1... 9126/2007 ~ inellas County Property Appr~~~er Information: 15 29 15 54450 034 00' ~ ~. ~~ I ~~ ~ ~~ ~J~~JO ~ ~~~ I ~03~ Page 3 of 5 26-Sep-2007 Jim Srnith, CFR Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:03:12 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use.' 10 V~c~n~ Fx~ra F~a~ur~s Uescriptivn Qimensivns Price Units Value RCU Year ~} . ao 0 0 o a ~} . au o 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4} .00 0 D 0 0 5} .00 0 0 0 0 6} . DD D 0 0 0 TOTAE. RECOR^ VALUE: 0 I http://136.174.187.13Chtbin/cgi-click?o=1&a=1&b=1&c=1&r=.16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 -, ~ Pinellas County Property App' ' ~er Information: 15 29 15 54450 034 0~' `~ ~A~~~i~~ ~oa StiAY ~RRlSt~~1 ~ ~- ~ "' 2~ ~2~ N~PRiSC~P~I ~~8 NA.RRE~C7hJ ! f~fA QL I A ~ I Cl~T I CSR N RRIO a~4 ~ 4c~ ~ ~3~ ~ . I~~(~ ~TU~ L€~7 US L aTUS 'ATH PATH PATH ARRISOty N I L~T~~ ~'il~~ I PATH H RRISD Page 4 of 5 ~~~ ~ ~/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002} http:// 136,174.1$7.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 Y~ ~,, Pinellas County Property App " ' ,er Information: 1 S 29 15 54450 034 (~'~ " '~ Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://136.174.187.13/hfbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 ~,,,~ ~~ - Pinellas County Property App'"''er lnformation: 15 29 1.5 54450 034 0~'"~ Page 2 of 5 ~5 I ~9 ! 15- I ~445~ / 0~4 1' X114 26-Sep-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:03:35 ^wnership Information !lacant Property Use and Sales S H K R I LLC OBK: 15942 OPG: 1401 1815 HEALTH CARE DR TRINITY FL 34655 EVAC; Hon-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prnp Rddr; 0 of Jan 1, 200?, based on Census Tract; 259.02 sales from 2006 - 2046: 0 Sale Date OR BoakJPage Price {Qual}UnQ} Vac}Imp Plat Information 8 /2,007 15,942/1,401 1,325,000 {M} U 1914: Book 003 Pgs 043- 2 I2, 005 14,143) 92i 1,300,000 {M} ~ U 1913: Book 001 Pgs 070- 0 /0 01 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 f0 0/ 0 0 { } 2447 Value EXEMPTI0N5 Just/Market: 99,600 Homestead: NO Ownership ~ ,000 Govt Exem: HO Use ~: .090 AssessedlCap: 99,600 Institutional Exem: HO Tax Exempt ~: ,000 Historic Exem; 0 Taxable: '99,600 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax: 2,248.22 Land Size Unit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: 1,985.74 Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage; 19..9371 1) 50 x 135 18. 00 f-, 750.00 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2) 0 x D .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-^ur-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 i, 985. 74 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2D47 taxes will be 1, 985.74 Short Legal MAGNOLIA PARK BLK 34, LOT 11 ^escription Building Information httpJ/1.36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1&c=1&i=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 . ~,, F~nellas County Property App ' ~er Information: 1 S 29 15 54450 034 OAT `' 1~ 1 29 ~ ~~ ~ 544~~ ,~ ~~~ ~ 011 Page 3 of 5 26-Sep-zoos Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas CDunty Property Appraiser 18:03:36 Vacant Parcel Property Use; 000 Land Use; 10 ~l~IC~rt-t Extra F~~~urss Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} . oa a a o a Z} , 00 0 D 0 0 3} .00 0 D 0 0 4} .00 0 D 0 0 5} .00 0 0 0 0 6) . as a a 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ®~® http://136.174.187.13/htbn/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &t=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 .,,,, Panellas County Property App'' ' ~er Information: 15 29 15 54450 034 0~~ `' ~~I ~ T~ ~f~IC~E Nr~'r ~RF~I~GP~J N,~RI~ I SC1N ~T~ NARRISOhI ~ 29 I ~ I (] iS L~TU~ ~ ~T~ -~ P~.TH fi~RRI~~Jt~I 42~ I1~ P.~TH RRI ~--u~ 1 ~ ~~ ~" Page 4 of 5 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://136.1.74.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a-1 &b=1 &c=1&r°.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=I ... 9/26/2007 . _ Pinellas County Property Ap}~' ~ ;er Information: 1S 29 15 54450 034 (~''"~ Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information ~, ~,, ~~. http://136.174.1$7.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3-1 &u=0&p=I ... 9/26/2007 F~inellas County Property Ap1+- '~er Information: 15 29 15 54450 034 0' ' `~ Page 2 of 5 ~.~ / ~~ 115 1 ~44~0 ~ 034 / 000 26-Sep-20D7 Jim Smith, CFR Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:03:58 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales S N K R I LLC OBK: 15942 OPG: 1401 1815 HEALTH CARE DR TRINITY FL 34'655 EVAC: Nan-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Rddr: 0 of Jan 7., 2007, based on Census Tract: 259.02 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Boak/Page Price {QualfUnQ} VacJlmp Plat Tnfarmatian 8 {2,007 15,942!1,401 1,325,000 ~M} U 1914: Boak 003 Pgs 043- 2 {2,005 14,143! 921 1,300,000 fM} I 1913: Boak 001 Pgs D70- 7 /1,982 5,276!2,162 14,900 4U} I ooaa: Bnok Pgs - a {a a! a D 4 } 2007 'Value EXEMPTIONS Just{Market; 300,90D Homestead; HG Ownership ~ .000 Gavt Exem: MO Use ~: .000 Assessed{Cap: 300,900 Institutional Exem: ~NO Tax Exempt ~; .DDO Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 300,900 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax information District: CW Seawaill: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax; 6,788.19 Land Size Unit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: 5,999.07 Frant x DeptYi Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 3} 152 x 135 18.00 20, 385, 00 S 07 Spec Rsmt; .OD 2} 0 x D .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4} D x 0 .Oa .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be 5) p x 0 .00 .00 5, 999. 07 5) p x 0 . DD . 00 Without any exemptions,- 2007 taxes will be 5,.999.07 Short Legal MAGNOLIA PRRK BLK 34, LOTS 9 & i0 & 50FT Description STRIP URC RR R!W ON E Building Information http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 l~inellas County Property App ' ~er Information: I S 29 15 54450 034 0' " ~ 15 I ~~ 1 ~5 I ~~~5~ ~ 034 1 ~Q90 page 3 of 5 ?6-Sep-?007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser i8: 03: 58 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use; 10 Vac~tn~ Extra F~a~urss Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 z) . o0 0 0 0 0 ~~ . ao 0 0 0 0 a~ . uu o a o 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 ~) .00 0 0 D 0 TOTAL RECDRD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (namvacant) ~l ' ~~®~~ httpa/136.174.187.13/htbn/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 ~sinellas County Property App ' ,er Information: 15 29 15 54450 034 0' ~ '' Page 4 of S ~ ~ ~T }RI~~]N i ~7 r'~f ~~~4~IY f~Q :T 'ISt~N ~ ac~a FT 'RISC I~°4 f~ FT .ARRI~J~1 r ii~ H RRIS~~~J 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http:// 136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 tLinellas County Property App ',er Information: 15 29 15 54450 034 (~' " `~ Page 5 of 5 Pinellas Count Pro ert A raiser '~ ~~"~~~~ Y ~ Y PP ~-- ~P~rcel. Information ~~ ~ ' ~~~~ . ~~ ~, ~~ . httpJ/136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=I&r=.16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 Pi Hellas County Property App' ' per Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 0~"'~ Page 2 of 5 .' F, 15 1 ~~ 1 15 ~ X4450 I 03~ ,~ ~2~~ 26-5ep-?007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:41:37 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales S N K R I LLC OBK: 15942 OPG: 1401 1815 HEALTH CARE OR TRINITY FL 34655 EVAG; Han-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prap Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2ao7, based on Gensus Tract: ?59.0? sales from 2005 - 2D06; p Sale Date OR Book{Page Price (Qual{UnQ} Vac{Imp Plat Information 8 {?,007 15,94211,401 1,325,000 {M} U 1914: Book 003 Pgs 043- ? {?,445 14,143) 921 1,300,000 {M} U 1913: Book 001 Pgs 070- 0 {0 41 0 D ( } DD00: Book Pgs - 4 {0 Of 0 D { } 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just{Market: 4$,104 Homestead: HO Ownership X .000 Govt Exem; HO Use ~; ,000 Assessed{Cap: 48,100 Institutional Exem; HO Tax Exempt ~; .000 Historic Exem: p Taxable: 48,iD0 Agricultural: 0 2007 lax Information District: GW Seawall; Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax: 1,006.02 Land Size Unit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: 958.98 Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1} 43 x 135 10. 00 5, 865. 00 S a7 Spec Asmt: .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .04 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 4 .44 .04 cap, 2007 taxes will be 5} 0 x 0 .04 .DD 958. 98 6) p x D . 00 DO Without any exemptions, 20o7 taxes will be 958. 98 Short Legal MAGHDLIA PARK BLK 3?, LOT 24 Description Building Information httpa/136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 Pinellas County Property Appr-~~er Informatian: 15 29 15 54450 033 0~`°~ r Page 3 of 5 26-Sep-2007 Jirn Smith, CFR Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:01:37 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 40 Vacant Extra F+ea~ur~s Description dimensions Price Units Value RCS Year 1) , 00 0 0 0 0 2} .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .40 0 0 0 0 5) .00 D 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 httpa/136.1.74.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 Pinellas County Property Ap~--~ser Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 0~°0 Page 4 of 5 ,~ ~. H~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ NA ~~ 1/S Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1&a=1&b=1&c=1&r=.16&s=4&zt3=1&u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 Pinellas County Property Appr-'cer Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 0~`°~1 Page 5 of 5 ~~ ~~- P><nellas County Property Appra><ser -~ Parcel Information ° : ~ ~~.~~ . http://136.1.74.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=1... 9/26/2007 ~_ i ~ V~/ FLD2007-09R''~; 124 1100 FT HARRISON LAND TRUST 402 JEFFORDS STREET LTD " ANDRIOLA, MICHAEL J 407 ST ANDREWS RD 402 JEFFORDS ST ANDRIOLA, JOANNA M BELLEAIR FL 33756 -1935 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3828 416 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 3375fi - 3832 ASHRAF, BESSADA DMP PA AUSTIN MEDICAL CTR INC B K B PROPERTIES INC 3184 CRESCENT OAKS BLVD 3389 CLARINE WAY E 800 ISLAND WAY TARPON SPRINGS FL 346$8 - 7610 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9439 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1825 BACH, MICHAEL BAIR, DAVID M BATT, HOWARD C BACH, PATTI 17389 US HIGHWAY 19 N 611 DRUID RD E # 712. 4176 MYSTIC CT CLEARWATER FL 33764 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3931 SAN JOSE CA 95124 - 3327 BAY REAL ESTATE INVESTORS BEKIRI, REIS BOLLANO, PIRO WEISS, MARY L THE BEKIRI, MAZES MICI, ELENI 1744 N BELCHER RD STE 200 539 JASMINE WAY 857 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1305 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 BOTANICAL & HERBAL RESOURCES BRIDGETON INVESTMENTS LLC BROWN, ELLEN RAYNA LLC 805 S FT HARRISON AVE 611 DRUID RD E # 201 & 202 2973 CIELO CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3959 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1411 BROWN, KENNETH P BURWELL, ROBERT A SR BROWN, BRENDA BURWELL, MERRY JUNE C S M PROPERTIES PTNSHP 423 MAGNOLIA DR 680 ISLAND WAY # 410 508 JEFFORDS ST # C CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1983 CLEARWATER FL 3375fi - 3839 GREAT BRITAIN CALVARIO, ALBERTO CARPENTER, DANA Q THE CASTAGNA LAW FIRM CALVARIO, DEBORA 612 HARBOR IS 611 DRUID RD E STE 710 20140 EAGLE GLEN WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1801 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947 ESTERO FL 33928 - 3051 CEKA BUILDING LLC CLAY, CHRISTINE CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS 1105 S FT HARRISON AVE 424 LOTUS PATH COALITION JOE EVICH, PRESIDENT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3907 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 P.O. BOX 8204 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 CONKLIN, LESLIE M CONTI, DIANA CREDITIQ INC CONKLIN, DEBRA S 525 JASMINE WAY 611 DRUID RD E # 405 430 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 391 7 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3935 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 CRISTINO, LENNY CRITCHLEY, JOSEPH E GSX TRANSPORTATION INC 115 8TH ST 423 LOTUS PATH 500 WATER ST BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3220 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 JACKSONVILLE FL 32202 - 4423 DELP, MICHAEL DESAI, ANUP DRUHILL PROF CTR CONDO ASSN DELP, SUSAN C DESAI, CHHAYA DRUID RD 516 JASMINE WAY 908 S FORT WARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3940 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 DRUID ROAD DUNN, THOMAS DWORKIN, GARY H 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 COMIANO, RONALD F DWORKIN, MARY L CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3948 843 S FT HARRISON AVE 415 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 EQUITY TRUST CO FARRIS, STEVEN FBO ROBERT A BURWELL JR IRA FARRIS, LAUREN FERRARA TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS 815 S FORT HARRISON AVE 472 HARBOR DRS 611 DRUID RD E # 704 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 INDIAN ROCK BEACH FL 33785 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939 3156 FETTIG, ALBERT G FL DEPT OF TRANS FORT HARRISON PROPERTY LAND 524 JASMINE WAY 315 COURT ST TR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 445 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2537 FOTIOU, ZACHARIAS FOTIOU, ZACHARIAS GENDUSA, SAMUEL J FOTIOU; MERCEDES FOTIOU, MERCEDES GENDUSA, JOY 428 MAGNOLIA DR 517 JASMINE WAY 414 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 GIOTAKIS, BOB GOODMAN, SHERRY COULD, RICHARD TREVOR 2401 VIRGINIA ST 420 LOTUS PATH COULD, DIANE CHRISTINE PARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 2252 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 513 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 HARBOR OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD HAKSAR, MANJULA HANGHOFER, ADELHEID G ASSOCIATION BOB FRITZ, HAKSAR, ELIZABETH 500 JASMINE WAY PRESIDENT 424 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3940 320 MAGNOLIA DRIVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3$3$ CLEARWATER, FL 33756 HARTLAGE, NANCY L HARRITY, MICHELLE HARTLAGE, STEPHEN M HEMERICK, F DAVID 803 S FORT HARRISON AVE 902 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 418 JEFFORDS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - HENDRIX, SCOTT D HEYE, HANS F HOLMES, JENNIFER HENDRIX, RANNIE D 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 PO BOX 592 221 GREENWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 PARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 0592 WEST PALM FL 33405 - JAMES EVANS JOSEPH THOMAS A NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING , JANNELLl, GILBERTG JOSEPH, DUNIA E SERVICES, INC 909 S FORT HARRISON AVE 612 WOODLAKE DR 300 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 LOUISVILLE KY 40245 - CLEARWATER, FL 33765 KEDAN, ELITE KEDAN, ELLA THE KERR, RUTH THEE 2354 HADDON HALL PL 2354 HADDON HALL PL 501 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 KILGORE, GARGLE W LAY, JERRY LEWIS, CATHERINE 105 WILLADEL DR 106 W 5TH ST # 3 553 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1941 COVINGTON KY 41011 - 1404 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 LINETSKY, LIDIA LOTUS LAND MADDALUNA, JOHN J LINETSKY,'FELIX S 1055 S FORT HARRISON AVE 813 HARBOR OAK LN 611 DRUID RD E # 302 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3905 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3919 MAGNOLIA MEDICAL CENTER LLC PO BOX 2893 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 2893 MARION, BRANDON L MARION, ANGELA M 849 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY 907 S FORT HARRISON AVE # 102 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 MARTENS, DAVID C MARTENS, CANDACE S 425 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 MAGURNO, ELTE A EST RR 2 BOX 280E ATHEN PA 18810 - 9646 MC QUIGG, MICHAEL C MC QUIGG, EUGENIA F 429 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 MIHOPOULOS, ALEXANDER MINES, JONATHAN MOORES, REBECCA J MIHOPOULOS, ELEONORA MINES, CAREEN 545 JASMINE WAY 505 DRUID RD E 201 HOWARD DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3909 BELLEAIR BEACH FL 337$6 - 3533 MORTON PLANT HOSP ASSN INC NICHOLS, DEAN E GHANA ENTERPRISES INC NICHOLS ANN C PO BOX 210 201 S LINCOLN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0210 119 POINCIANA LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - LARGO FL 33770 - 2662 PAITSEL, RICHARD PANTELIDES, GUS K PATCH, JAMES M PAITSEL, PATRICIA PATCH, SHARON E 611 DRUID RD # 703 853 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939 825 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 PAUL, JASON PENNY, KENNETH E JR PERFECTLY BALANCED BOOKS INC GOSCEN-PENNY, LEE 845 HARBOR OAK LN 611 DRUID RD E # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 4598 CLEARWATER HARBOR DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3920 LARGO FL 33770 - PHILLIPS, CRAIG S PINELLAS COUNTY RODRIGUEZ, ROSALIA C PHILLIPS, PEGGY L 315 COURT ST 418 LEEWARD IS 611 DRUID RD E #707 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2309 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947 I q RUIZ, MIGUEL SAAR, FATHY Z SCHAEFER, JAMES O 811 S FORT HARRISON AVE SHENODA, SAMIRA S SCHAEFER, NANCY E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 528 JASMINE WAY 430 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3940. CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 SHAMSAH, H SHIDI TRUST SHEHU, FATBARDH SHOHAM, ILANA 611 DRUID RD E STE 301 809 HARBOR OAK LN 815 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3919 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 SILVER, LESLIE SKOU, JAN ERIK KNUDSGAARD SILVER, GILDA TYRIVEGEN 19 SOTOS, ELAINE 816 HARBOR OAK LN JESSHEIM 2050 00000 - 8507 W NORMAL CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3936 NORWAY NILI`S IL 60714 - SPIRIDELLIS, NIKOLAOS T STEVENS, KAREN STEWART, BRUCE 170 SAND KEY ESTATES DR 424 JASMINE WAY STEWART, DONNA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2981 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 841 HARBOR OAK LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 SUBRAMANIAN,ARUNACHALAM SUBRAMANIAN,ARUNACHALAM SZABO,BRUCE SUBRAMANIAN, VALLI SUBRAMANIAN, VALLI 800 S FORT HARRISON AVE 8777 LAUREL DR 611 DRUID RD E STE 717 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3902 PINELLAS PARK FL 33782 - 4345 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947 TAM PARTNERS LLC TEMME, R WAYNE TOLAN, DONALD J 1 RED MILL LN 421 JASMINE WAY TOLAN, MAUREEN DARIEN CT 06820 - 3612 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 417 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 TOLBA, ALAN TOMAK, TYRONE J TOWN HOMES OF HARBOR OAKS TOLBA, MICHAEL A HOME 7870 DANA POINT RD 837 HARBOR OAK LN LAS VEGAS NV 89117 -1927 4131 GUNN HIGHWAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3933 TAMPA FL 33618 - TULLY JOE TRAPOZZANO, RUBY H TURNER, GERALDINE C 901 SEMINOLE BLVD # 102 TULLY, CYNTHIA 801 S FORT HARRISON AVE LARGO FL 33770 - 7456 611 DRUID RD # 407 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3935 URBANEK, ANTHONY P WAYLAND, ROBERT E WICKERSHAM, HERBERT F URBANEK, ANN CHALACHE, NAJEH F WICKERSHAM, M ANN 537 JASMINE WAY 905 S FT HARRISON AVE 428 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3917 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 YOUSSEF, AIDA N REVOCABLE YOUSSEF, NANCY S TRUST YOUSSEF, TAMERS 2001 TRUST TRUS PO BOX 508 536 JASMINE WAY PO BOX 6062 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3940 INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - CHESTERFIELD MO 63006 - 8062 0508 ;~, ~- - v o o 0 0 - ~ I I ~' 'i'I ~~T ^ _ ^ `,'~ ~; , ~', N, ~ '. r ~ 4 k I ~ Q ~i, J 4J 0 ~ ~ - ! ; , '. i ~~ .. , . ~; ~ o.oo ooo~ .,, .~.~....~......,.~ _ _...,_ _ r~ - ,. ...; __ ~' S B9 5121 W ! ~ ~.. " ~ ~-206,~3'- o ~ f; ~' . .,..~ .. ~~ ~V °d ..:~ _, ~! °~ :r ( r E it 7.00 m 1.40 3.80 DB meters Width : Z.ZO Track :2.00 Cock to Cock Tr'me :6.00 Steering Angle :30.00 o.~~ .. NORTH SCALE: 1" = 30' Qq~. J~ 43~ ~~ ~' a~ ~~ u ~ 5 ~° 3 tr ~ V} ~~Q~.~ffi ~~~~,~ ~~ ~~~ ~~xW o~~ ~~ ~~ ~w ~~ ~LL ra a€ Su NESGami.: 0731 DirAm ~ B. .Y. oh~dBr W.F.H. Issue Date: 08/31101 Revisions: No. Dm Devi ' /r ,/ /, ,/ ~/ ,; a a M~ U a W U A ~a 0 °a wJ ~ J 'L-~T1 I~ O d F~ ~~ o; LL ~; Q SJ _~ TM=e,~~e~.~~~.~,~~,~TM~~eM ~~~~ RAH A VJ4L PA.0. P.E g11~71 ~ v m~ wnxe ,, A .~ L .E ~~ ~~',~ .. ~. . ~~ ~, MA~N~LI~4 _?~f~'IV~~ _ __~.__.. aK 2 >r iii- :`, F ,' ~t . ~ ,: ~E~i _0Oe e ee ~~ ,Z ~I` I[ ~ I w ~Illilllll~' ~-srDRr MEDICAL BUILDING is1 FLDDR MEDICAL CLINIC 9,796 S.F, 2nd FLDDR MEDICAL DFFICf 10,018 S.F,