Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2005-11108
FLD2005-11108 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 285A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 11/02/2005 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLW CoverSheet f Clearwater U _. Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax:727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) V t.(~ r ~ ~\ I H FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 1 ` V 1 ~! Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised o4-OS-OS) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Shephard' s Beach. Resort, Inc . MAILING ADDRESS: 619 S. Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater, FL. 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727-442-5107 ~/ CASE #:~' ~~ //t~t/J ~ L I. DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: FAX NUMBER: 727-447-2009 William M. Shephard, as Trustee under the provisions of the PROPERTY OWNER(S): Shephard Family Trust Agreement. dated Febrttar~r~,~ 1984 (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: E.D. Armstrong III, Esp., .Tohnson, .Pn~, Rc,knr, Ruppe~ & BurAS_, TTP MAILING ADDRESS: 911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE NUMBER: 727-461-1818 FAX NUMBER: 727-467-n365 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: eda@ J pf irm. com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) ~ ~ ........ ,~ ~ STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 619 S . Gulfview Blvd . ,, (:~~~~,~ i~~l~., ~,~ ~ ~Lr'~~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit rrArr attached 1 t (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) 17-29-15-05004 003 00 9 ~'' .f ~ - - 10 PARCEL NUMBER: t'LH~ViV~iVC~ ~E~A~~;~/IENT PARCEL SIZE: 2.68 Acres /~~T1,/ /1,Ir ,.., ~,~„~~~,,,~. (acres, square feet) ~..~~ r r..r ~.~.a:r~t~~ttrrrtrt PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 111 unit hotel, 2 condominiums with (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) accessory uses. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Exhibit rrBrr attached ~ Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ~ ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES X NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable do C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ^ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria 1 through 6. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development v~ill not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. :-~ ~tn n~ ~ ~ ~ ! r ~l 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ~~~~ ~f ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~4~I~lt~i(~ ~~~A~r~~~NT CITY OF O-_~~!~-n-~~r~R 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ^ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria 1 through 10. Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ~ ORIGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and funcfion that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Divisiofn~5-of Article3,(as-applicable)~se separate sheets as necessary. ~~ ~ L, ~ f,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E~ i 1 j ASS ~t 11 ~ ~t)1~~ P~A,NNING DFI~,AI?z~~~ CITY OF CLEAR~~lATFR Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater • Ofd~GINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the C of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to tl requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^~ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detentioNretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. L Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL J (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Hl Ack~ement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): ~C/ " Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ® LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; a PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (e. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of alt PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; ~1 ?'~ , c~ 1~'~ ~ ! I;vl~ ~f u~ PLA(~NIIVG DEPART~iEN CITY OF CLEAR~IIATER 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment • ORIGAdAL I, Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; ' Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; ~ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ^ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %2 X 11) and color rendering if possible; ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot wntours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations iF required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborisY', of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such to _ 1 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ~~`~ ~'`% '. ~ ~f I~'~'~ ^~ ... ~~ ® ~. LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; CITY OF CtEAl2lNATER Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/= X 11) (color rendering if possible); IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code v~ill not be met. SOY 0 2 ZUO5 PLANNING DEiPAR~'~IENT Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater • ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. q Q^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS-all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; G~t'S~ ' ^ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to sale (8'/: X 11) (black and white and color rendering, ff possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ~O All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ~ ~ ~ i / ^ Reduced si na a ro osal 8'/z X 11 color , if submittin Com rehensive Si n Pro ram a lication. LLL!!!~~;~ ~ ~~._n-, 9 9 P P ( )( ) 9 P 9 9 Pp K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: ~~~~/~I~C-"~+~" ~~~,~A,~~T~~~ • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. CI 1 i OfC 6,rL~A~YV~IER • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle lips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. V ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and a ch turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. i -Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City re ntatives to visit and photograph the property described in s aoolicaiion./I .. /~ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ s day of NovPmhPr A.D. 20~j_ to me and/or by F._n _ Armstrong TT1'who is personally known h~€xa4~ 1-'~T / I /L /1) /w /~ M 1 ~ Signature of property owner or representative E.D. Armstrong, III Notary public, (/ My commission expires: , - a ~ MY COMMISSION # DD 080 ~OF ti~~ EXPIRES: January 2b, 2006 I~pp3.pppTARV FL NCAary Service & Ba'+d~~9• t11C. Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City ~ OR161NAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: William M. Shephard, as Trustee under the provisions of the Shephard Family Trust Agreement, dated February 29, 1984 (Names of 811 properly owners on deed -Please PRIPIT full names) t. That (I am/we are) the owner(s)-and record title folder(s) of ~e following described Properly (address or genera! location): 619 S. Gulfview Blvd. 2. That ittis property consfitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible Development Approval, Comprehensive Landscape Program, Transfer of Density Rights Approval E.D. Armstrong III, Esquire, 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (doesldo) appdnt: of Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed b induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and ad on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process ttis application and the owner authormes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct./fl I~~~`'f ~ Property ~PenY Ouvr~r Property ONmer STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS - Before me the undersigned, an officer duly carnmissioned by the Paws of the State of Florida, an this ~ ~ ~~ day ~ October 2005 persoreliyappeared William M. Shephard who having been tdury~r+ om Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the aff~avit that he/she sicned. n /~1 ~.~~ ~ G. s~.a My Commission F~cpines: , ~ _ My Corrxrritsion t~16S12/ ~~ ^~ ~ i-r S:1Plannirrg t?BpartmentlApplitation Formsldevetopmenr reviewlNexibfe development comprehensive lnflll redevelopment application 200b.aM~~! f-, ~ ~ ~ ~~~i ~ r~ov ~ 2 z~a~ ~LAi~i~l~lG BE~P~~itUIENT Page 7 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive hrfill Redevelopment Application z~ City ~ GeCI tep OF CL~~~' "TER ~'~'~ \ ~ ~ '1~° ~ `~ \~ C~ Of~61NAL EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT, INC. 619 S. GULFVIEW BLVD. Section B. Description of Request The applicant, Shephard's Beach Resort, Inc., has owned the property located at 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard ("Subject Property") for ov r 28 years. On the Subject Property, the applicant successfully operates 97 oom, three diamond resort, which is known as the Shephard's Beach Resort. Shephard's Beach Resort has been a staple in the beach community for close to three decades, providing relaxing overnight accommodations, breathtaking views of the Gulf of Mexico and sunsets, good food, and great entertainment. Shephard's Beach Resort recently constructed a new phase to the resort, adding additional hotel rooms, a 176 space parking garage, and other accessory uses. The number of overnight accommodation units on Clearwater Beach has been significantly reduced as a result of the hotel to condominium conversion over the recent years. In response, the applicant proposes to continue the existing overnight accommodation use and redevelop the Subject Property consisting of 111 upscale resort overnight accommodation units and 2 residential condominium units. In order to facilitate the redevelopment, simultaneously with the filing of this application, the applicant has submitted (i) an application for transfer of development rights (10 units) from Hedson, LLC (Coca Cabana Motel) to the Subject Property; (ii) an application for transfer of development rights (3 units, which converts to 4 overnight accommodation units) from TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC to the Subject Property; and (iii) an application for transfer of development rights (2 units) from Clearwater Beach Sales Center, LLC to the Subject Property. Specifically,- the applicant seeks flexible development approval- of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, in accordance with the plans submitted with this application, including relief as follows: 1. Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (97 existing overnight accommodation units, where a maximum of 94 overnight accommodation units are permitted under the current Code); 2. Transfer of Development Rights of 10 overnight accommodation units from 669 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater; four overnight accommodation units from 627 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater (1 residential unit owned by Taylor Woodrow) and 665 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater (2 residential units .,._..,.~ r ~~;~ ~ J:~ j~,,~ ~t1V (~ 212Q05 PLANI\IING DE~A~~i~~ENT CIiY OF CLEA4~!-lATER Of~INAL owned by Taylor Woodrow); and 2 residential units from 645 Bayway Boulevard, Clearwater, under the provisions of Section 4-1402; 3. An increase of the maximum building height to allow proposed hotel with height of 145' 2" to roof slab; 4. Architectural embellishment gable located 7' 6" above roof slab; 5. Surrounding mansard located 9' above roof slab; 6. Direct access to an arterial street, South Gulfview Boulevard; 7. A rear (south) building setback of 0' to seawall where 20' is required by Code, which will allow construction of an outdoor deck; 8. Aside (east) setback for structures other than buildings of 0' where 15' is required by Code; 9. A front (north) setback for structures other than buildings of 0' where 15' is required by Code; and Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The adjacent property to the west is the Ramada Inn, which is being converted to a multi-use hotel/condominium development. North: The adjacent property to the north is a Hess gas station and convenience store, which will benefit from the proposed use and wilt -serve the guests of the resort. East: The adjacent property to the east is the Econo Lodge Motel. South: The Subject Property is bounded on the south by the Gulf of Mexico and Clearwater Pass. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with recently approved developments on Clearwater Beach, such as the Estrada and the Adams Mark, which included approvals of. transfers_ .. of density and height increases above 100'. ~ ~ -; ~ ~.~'' 1 ~ I`~nv r, 2 20115 2 '~(..f~+~l11~~'~ D~~~'~~T~EMT ~!`i~Y L ~ ~~ J`~2UlATER The proposed project meets the Design Guidelines set forth in Section VII (C), Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings of Beach by Design. Please refer to the detailed discussion of this criterion in the response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria No. 10. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The Subject Property is currently occupied by the Shephard's Beach Resort, a 97-room resort hotel, which is less than 60' in height and constructed in 1957. Forty rooms of the existing 97 rooms, a 176 parking space parking garage, and a night club were added to the Subject Property in 2001. The proposed project will improve current conditions on the Subject Property in a number of ways, including: (1) Superior architectural design, including tiered effect, and lush landscaping, which will visually enhance the neighborhood and the beach community; (2) Construction which meets current building Codes, as opposed to the existing building constructed over 45 years ago; (3) Excess parking, improved stacking space and elimination of traffic congestion; (4) Beach Walk improvements incorporated into the site provide for a better pedestrian flow, which is visually appealing, along South Gulfview than what currently exists; (5) Property value will significantly increase. These improvements will in no manner be a hindrance but will serve to increase surrounding property values, improve safety and enhance the views of the site from adjacent parcels. The hotel guests of the proposed project will be potential clientele of nearby restaurants and other businesses. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The inclusion of the Beach Walk improvements, shell sidewalks, will improve the pedestrian flow and safety along South Gulfview. Safety is also improved by minimizing traffic congestion as described in Criteria 4 below. Demolition of the existing hotel built in 1957 and the construction of the proposed structures built to current building Codes, improve the safety of the building occupants and neighbors. ~~~~ ii J ~ ~ Gov o 2 2ao~ PI.~NI~fG D~~t~R%~4~NT CITY OF CL:~'~=J~JAT~R • ORIt~NAL 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion: The applicant has provided information concerning the project to the City's Traffic Operations Division, through Bennett Elbo, which concurs that the proposed project does not generate any additional trip volumes and, therefore, does not require a Traffic Impact Analysis. There are a number of ways in which the project has been designed to minimize traffic congestion on South Gulfview Boulevard: (1) Excess parking is provided on the Subject Property and vehicular circulation within and through the development affords ease of movement for pedestrians and vehicles. In addition, excess parking on the Subject Property will alleviate the back-up of vehicles looking for parking spaces; (2) The circular shaped access will facilitate off-street loading and unloading. In addition, in case of emergency, it will provide off-street access to the Subject Property, which will reduce traffic back-up on South Gulfview. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The Subject Property is located within Clearwater Pass District. The project is also consistent with the community character of the Clearwater Pass District, which Beach by Design describes as an area of mixed uses, including high rise resort hotels and condominiums. Although not part of the "Beach Walk District," the project incorporates Beach Walk improvements in the City right-of-way as envisioned by Beach by Design, -- - including shell sidewalks and Medjool palms. As to the immediate vicinity, to the south is the Gulf of Mexico and Clearwater Pass, the parcel to the west is a multi-use hotel condominium project, the parcel to the east is the Econo Lodge Motel. The parcel to the north is occupied by Amerada Hess Corporation and functions as a gas station and convenience store. As previously stated, the Subject Property currently functions as a hotel. The proposed development is consistent with the current use and will be consistent with the mix of uses in the immediate vicinity..;`,-~~ +_ ,. .~ -~f~V ~ 2 2005 4 d tL~.Y~P~I~~ • C~IGINAL 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal at this south end of Clearwater Beach, which is also visible from Clearwater Pass, the Sand Key Bridge, and Sand Key Park. The architectural style integrates a "seaside beach resort" design, which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this waterfront property. The acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation for the proposed redevelopment project are consistent with (i) the Subject Property's current use and (2) the surrounding uses on the beach. The applicant currently has an occupational license to operate a 167 seat restaurant and will redevelop the Subject Property to include a 160 seat restaurant. The applicant is taking special care to create an enhanced "resort environment," which will benefit adjacent properties and businesses. The design forms, color and lighting of the proposed development are similar to the grand seaside resorts; however, shaped to be compatible with other existing and proposed buildings along South Gulfview. The intent is to elegantly shape vacation fantasy into a full service, fun resort. The design incorporates the guidelines of Beach by Design while adding a lacy, open air detail for identity and interest as a beach resort. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The applicant desires to demolish the existing improvements with the exception of the improvements constructed in 2001, and construct the proposed project, which has been thoughtfully designed to comply with Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent possible. The proposed deviations, which are discussed in detail in Criteria 8 below, are necessary and minimal deviations to Code without which the project cannot be constructed at this location. Use. There is no proposed use deviation. The proposed use as a resort hotel is allowed in the "Tourist" District and is one of the uses suggested in Beach by Design for the Clearwater Pass District. In ~add;tion-.~ ;-=~~~ ~I',=',~ y = :~ ~, t4 s `~7 ~I ~':~ ~~~1 0 2 2005 ~L~1 s~.~~1~'~ D~ag,~~ ~~~~NT • ORIGINAL condominiums are a permitted use in the "Tourist" District and a suggested use in the Clearwater Pass District. Intensity. The proposed density is in keeping with Code provisions allowing termination of non-conformity status, transfers of density to the Subject Property, and increased height in the Clearwater Pass District. In addition, the proposed intensity will benefit the beach community and the City as a whole by preserving overnight accommodation units. Development Standards. There is no deviation to the setbacks for the main structure. All requested setback reductions are. for sidewalks, paving, decks, and the like, without which it would be impossible to accomplish the lush landscaping, open views, and safety features. The relief requested with respect to the surrounding mansard and the architectural embellishments will conceal permitted mechanical equipment and reduce mass and bulk of the building. The project otherwise meets or exceeds many of the City's development criteria, including parking and open space requirements, floorplate requirements, and maximum building envelope: Proposed parking is 356 spaces, which is well in excess of the 114 spaces required by Code. As for the requested access to South Gulfview, there is no other possible access to the site. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The current assessed value of the property, per the Pinellas County tax rolls; is $7,950,000.00. The applicant estimates that the value of the property after the proposed redevelopment will be approximately $60,000,000. The value of surrounding properties will be increased by the redevelopment project. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Overnight accommodations and condominium units are allowed uses in the "Tourist" zoning district. Such uses are also contemplated as an appropriate use in the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. In fact, the overnight accommodation use currently exists on the Subject Property and condominium residential units exist on adjacent parcels. The applicant currently has an occupational license to operate a 167 seat restaurant and will redevelop the Subject Property to include a 160 seat restaurant. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. infill env 0 2 zoos l'l..i'i~~i~:i1~'?i:-' lo!'=:~~~c ~li~~f~NT C3~tY ~'~ ~~.`=r.:". ~r lire. • Ofif61NAL West: The adjacent property to the west is a multi-use condominium/hotel project, which is consistent with the proposed redevelopment of the Subject Property. North: The adjacent property to the north is a Hess gas station and convenience store. As is currently the case, the gas station and convenience store will be used by the guests of the hotel, thereby benefiting the owner of the parcel to the north. East: The adjacent property to the east is an Econo Lodge Motel, which use is consistent to the proposed redevelopment. South: The property is bounded on the south by the Gulf of Mexico. The redevelopment of the Subject Property will beautify and improve the Subject Property as viewed from all sides and will incorporate Beach Walk improvements, making the beach community unified. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. [This criterion was deleted by Code amendment.] 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the .immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. As shown by the proposed site plan and architectural and landscape plans, the proposed redevelopment will revitalize this location at the south end of Clearwater Beach. The inclusion of Beach Walk improvements will improve the pedestrian access and enjoyment of this area of Clearwater Beach. In addition, the preservation of overnight accommodation units will - -- - significantly benefit the surrounding property owners and businesses. As an important component of the hotel stock on Clearwater Beach, the Applicant's purpose was to form an exciting visual facade for day and . night. Therefore, large gables, loggias, and pavilions with seaside character were placed for visual impact and to reduce mass and scale. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. _ -- -- , N~iV 0 2 ZQ05 ~~1?E~w:~'?~ t~ y~?=: ~t~:~:~~~NT • ORIGINAL As for the City of Clearwater as a whole, the project will greatly increase the property value, thereby increasing the City's tax base. The applicant has demonstrated the project's compliance with the guidelines of Beach by Design, which is in the best interest of the City. As for the community character of the immediate vicinity, the redevelopment of the Subject Property will create a beautiful and inviting resort atmosphere. The design of the proposed project will include stepped roof lines, clerestory dormers, a timber framing look, juxtaposed massing, exterior terraces, arched and curved details, shuttered windows, arcades and pavilions, a lively silhouette, and casual beach colors, including coconut white, Ceylon cream, egret, shoreline blue-green, canal blue, and breaker blue. As previously stated, the design of the proposed project is consistent with the Beach by Design guidelines and other approved projects along South Gulfview. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel .proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Termination of Non-conforming Status The applicant seeks termination of non-conforming status, in accordance with Section 6-109 of the Code, to allow the existing density of 97 overnight accommodation units to remain on the Subject Property. Section 6-109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status . as a non-conforming use or structure with the following requirements: --- -- 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the -requirements of Section 3- -- 1202(C) shall be installed. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202(D). This requirement is not applicable as all off-street parking will be enclosed in the proposed project. ~ ~, ~_ q ~Irtu (~ 2 2~Q5 PIA~~~~'~ ~~:~ '.:~8:.'"~f~T • ORIGINAL 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this .development code. The applicant agrees to accept a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code or be approved as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. The proposed landscaping either meets or exceeds Code requirements. Due to the request of the City's Fire Marshall to include a circular drive and the minimum standards for such drives, the Applicant is not able to reduce the size of the drive to provide for the foundation landscape. Alternatively, the applicant will provide lush landscaping in the circular drive island, which will serve the same purpose as the foundation landscape and allow for increased safety. Height The request for additional height is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design, which provides for increased height in the event of a transfer of development rights to the Subject Property. This request includes transfer of development rights applications to transfer 14 eligible overnight accommodation units and 2 residential units to the site from four other sites on Clearwater Beach. There is a reasonable relationship between the height increase for the resort hotel and the 16 transferred units based upon other cases recommended for approval by staff and actually approved by CDB, consistent with Beach by Design. There are 23 proposed overnight accommodation units and 2 residential units located above 100`. The request for additional height for the decorative gable will- allow architectural embellishment, which will decrease the scale and mass of the building by adding a detailed human scale element as in .Beach by Design guidelines In addition, large gables, loggias, and pavilions with seaside character were placed for visual impact and to reduce mass and scale. -~F ~~ ;, ~aflil C 2 ~~05 ..~~ .~ ., .~,9., _, . a . r ~ ~ IGINAL Setbacks There is no requested deviation from the setbacks to the building itself. The relief sought from setbacks is with regard to pavement, pavers, sidewalks, decks, or structures other than buildings and are necessary to accomplish the inviting and visually appealing resort atmosphere. The building itself is 20' from the seawall (south side of project); however, the proposed outdoor deck is 0' from the seawall, which is necessary to meet FEMA requirements. The deck serves a vital role in the making Shephard's Beach Resort an entertainment hotspot and providing a wonderful outdoor atmosphere for its guests to enjoy. The deck is an extended open air balcony and not air conditioned. As previously discussed, the Applicant recently constructed additional hotel rooms, a parking garage, and a night club, all of which received prior approval for any setback encroachments. Relief from Minimum Driveway Spacing The Fire Marshall for the City of Clearwater requested that a circular drive be incorporated into the design of the redevelopment project for safety concerns. It is not possible to incorporate a circular drive without slightly deviating from the design guidelines, however. Access to an Arterial The property is accessed from South Gulfview and the Shephard's Beach Resort has always had direct access from South Gulfview. There is no other viable access. The applicant has proposed a circular driveway in response to the Fire Marshall's request. To accommodate the request of the Fire Marshall, however, it is necessary to reduce the required spacing between the two entrance points, as discussed above. In connection with the applicant's request for transfers of density to the property, the following are responses to the TDR criteria of Section 4- 1403.A. 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Please see the detailed discussion of how the project will improve abutting properties in response to General Applicability Criteria 2. ~ , -~ . -,"1 --., v Iv~V d 2 1005 10 Pl.~il~~~~~C L~~;a~~~;'.'~NT • ~21GINAL 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Overnight accommodations and residential units and the accessory uses are permitted in the City. The applicant currently has an occupational license to operate a 167 seat restaurant and will redevelop the Subject Property to include a 160 seat restaurant. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Please see the detailed discussion of the how the project is compatible with adjacent land uses in the response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Criteria 4. 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Please see the detailed discussion of how the project will improve abutting properties in response to General Applicability Criteria 2. 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which. enhances the community. character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Please see the response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria 7. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel -- - proposed for development. - - - - - As shown on the proposed site plan, the project provides excess parking. The applicant proposes 356 off-street parking spaces, where 114 spaces are required by Code. All off-street parking is located within the buildings and vehicular circulation through the development affords an ease of movement for pedestrians and vehicles. !~~`lU c 2 2~5 P~11~~a~'~ ~ ~...:'.?~~lT r .: "a..r.i~i~ • C~IGINAL 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as .applicable). The proposed project has been designed in accordance with Beach by Design design guidelines. We provide the following information concerning the height, mass and bulk criteria. Mass Concept 1. The floorplates between 45' and 100' are below the maximum 25,000 s.f. guideline set forth in Section VII, B.3, Beach by Design, as 13,690 s.f. are provided, which is 55% of the guideline. Between 100' and 150', the first 20' are 13,690 s.f., slightly over the 10,000 s.f. guideline, the second 15'-6" is 10,608 s.f. and the last 10' is 8,208 s.f., below the 10,000 s.f. guideline. 2. The slight deviation on some levels (20%) is requested to affect the tiered effect creating a softer mass and scale impact. Other design features are also incorporated to reduce mass and scale and to add vitality to this resort project. 3. No plane exceeds 60' without significant articulation (100' guideline). The overall length and width is superior to the 40% guideline and 64% of all facades have windows or architectural embellishment incorporated in them. 4. The deviations requested pursuant to Section VII, B.3, Beach by Design, are justified by the significant tiered effect of the building, the extraordinary step-backs and the architectural embellishments, all of which reduces the mass and scale of the building. Tower Separation 1. The project consists of one tower at 145' 2" measured from base flood elevation:- -T-he original structure is less than 40' and the new addition is less than 60'. 2. For the 145' 2" portion of the building: a. TDR's are included. b. The portion of the building that exceeds 100' is 694' from the nearest "over 100' structure" to the west and 685' from the nearest "over 100' structure" to the east. (Entrada approved DO to the west and Enchantment approved DO to the east). Therefore ; no ~ ~-- ~~V (~ 2 2005 12 111 ~ w s~ r;~ ~ r,^'+ 7 i'~ T APIGINAL structures over 100' appear within 500' of this structure, meeting Option 1 page 57, Beach by Design. f~t1V E 2 ~~~5 13 • ORIGINAL DENSITY TABLE 97 Existing Hotel Rooms (available through request for termination of non- conformit -111 Proposed overnight accommodation units - 2 Proposed residential dwelling units 16 Densit units needed total - 10 ---- - __ Overnight accommodation units purchased from Hedson, LLC + 4 Overnight accommodation units purchased from TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC (purchased 3 residential dwelling units, converts to 4 overni ht accommodation units + 2 Residential Dwelling units purchased from Clearwater Beach Sales Center =16 Residential and overnight accommodation units requested to be transferred to the site 97 Existin Hotel Rooms +14 Additional overnight accommodation units purchased + 2 Additional residential dwelling units urchased 113 Proposed total densit units 46113.109875 #359103 v1 - Shephards/Density table - - - /BIBBkw ~~i ~~ O HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL i r. .~ E Y ~4 ~ ~~~ I ~~ HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL ^~ 1.~ f ~*- r.<~ ~ B.i ` ( ~ O © j ' r O ~ ` f ~ ~. F ~ ~r ~ q C ff V ~ Y j ~1 L~_ _~ ~ °'°y7 ( ~,~ ' - ~ U b•r~ ~ CL GRAPHIC SCAlE Wp - m01 LEGEND ..'...'.. TM~DARY GENFRAI_ NOTES: 1. ENONEER/IANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: %pM ZAYAC k ASSOCIATES, INC. )01 ENTFAPRISE ROAD EAST. SUITE 401 SATEtt HARBOR, R ]1885 ()x) ]93-0000 Buy ()I) TB3-BBSS FuX 2 9TE AWRESS: et8 SWTH GUTAMEW CIEMWAIFR, R PMm I0: )/zB/IS/0soo4/o0]/0010 ZONING: 'Y ] PPESENi USE 8) OKPNtWT ACCOYYODAnONS k 180 SEAT RESTAURANT 1. OENGOPED USE IIt OWAMCHT ACCOYMOOAnONS, x CONDOLIINNY UN112 k 160 SEAT RESTAURANT q TOTAL 91E AREA 118,83].01 Si (x.88 AC) PROECT SITE AREA 0],))5.61 Y (1.46 AC) 6. SETBAD(5: ~EQ ( (NEW CONSTRUCTION) 10-15' FRONT J0.58' 4W. (NORTH 10 BLOO) ZB.)5' MIN. (NORTH i0 PAN:MENT) 0-10' 90E 15.00' YIN. (EAST TO BLDG) t0-x0' REAR 2).35' MIN. (SOUM TO BLDG.) xo.B3• YIN (SOUTH ro unwALL) o.oD' 4w. (sauTH PYYT To sFAw,1LL) BEmIIBEl1 PH9POSII (Ensn4c caNDITNIns) 1o-15' TRaXT 15.26' MIN. (MONTH to BLDG.) 0-10' 40E 18.BY MN. (WEST ro BIDG) 10-20' REAR 1gB4' YM. (Sglnl TD BIDG.) 6.66' MIN. $WM 1D SEAWALL) D.ar MM. SdITH vwr ro gAwALL) ). ALLOWABLE MA% NEIGNT JS'-100' R PROPOSED BLDG. HpCHi 145'-Y MOY fEMA IJNE TO ROOF DECK q SOLID WASTE WMPSTDi wLL BE LOGTFD M BUILDING 9. UGHDNC MTHIN PflOJECi BWNDARIES wLL BE ATTACHED TO ~ BURDINC ANO YALL BE SUBMITTED AS PMT OF ANAL BUILDING PLANS. 10. E%ISnNG BUMINC FOOTPRINT AREAS ~ 5,181.)) SF 11. ALL DISNRBp1 g1A55 NiNIN RICIIT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED. 12 ALL UNUSED DRI1£WAYS MUST DE REMON:D AND REPUCED WI1N CURB SDEwAIx, AND EUIDSCAPINC ro MATCH EIOSnNG CONdDON$ 1]. iL000 ZONE iH15 PROPpitt uES wIIHIH ROOD ZONE 'NE' AS DEPICTED ON fEYA 8000 IHSURMCE RAZE MAP N0. 1x10XM 01G (f1FV 11) OATm: SEPRMBFR 3. x003 11. A CdIPREHEN5INE SIW PACKAGE WILL BE SUBMITTED UNDFA A SEPMATE PEAYIT APPIICADOH. 15. i1SAE ARE NO UDptt EASEMENTS IOENDFIEO BY 1HE SURVEY ON TNIS PROPFFtt. 1B. nSRE ARE NO ENNPOIAENTALLY UNIQUE ARUS ON SDE LANDWARD ai SEAWALL 1). WMPSTER SERNCE SMALL BE MRMCEO MM SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT PPIOR TO THE ISSUMCE 6 M OCCUPAnOHAL LICENSE OR CERDDCAIE 6 OCCUPANCY. PLEASE CONTACT TOM CIENN AT )x).582.49]0 16 °-TF DATA T!_ ENS@et ~@ A TOTAL 511E ARG II&0.1).81 4 (].BB AC) ttgB3).81 Sf (268 K) 10.080.00 Sf q PRDECT 91E AREA 83.71841 SF 0.48 AC) ggT/i/l S (I.M AC) N/A n IOTIl OPDI SPACD T.4BB.8) 9 (n49 AC) IB,BB).ID 4 (n]e AC) BN.eI S (601 AC YM.) D. BUBDOIG F001NeXT: 18,08516 Y (0.25 fM) x),810.Bx SF (nU FM) - E SIOfw.W(/OEIXYPAND !AEAMy2M 4 10]21.38 4 JS,BB).%Ei (0.B$ 60. YAYI F. roTa BSERMWS AREA 4x,zssT4 s (nee ~) 1geaBxl s (nn ea) G PAR101C SPACL4 110 SPACES ]58 9ACFS 111 (I.0 9'MSALNn 1 N WMOANI IAFA NIA NIA O S 9I~11ABI) • M UMS L N1EAM11L LANDSCAPE NSA X/A N/A N/A a ON.HIlONT ACCOVl100AngIS 8) UNR 111 UIII15 101 (40 UNi$/ACTS) i % YAwnar mDDk1AM LNIB 0 u415 z ur0rs X/A i ISRNED FOR PEfRMffTIND ONLY G ~ ~,'-•. 4~'> ~' t '"f ~;, r.i;' ~''T`, a r. ~~" Q N ~g ~ m >pm F W" M U rt D% LO U C ~~ ~ a W I ` UT ro U V~jj Ci M~Qa a ~ zd 04 ^ x ~ .7 V CK D• w ~ FF. ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 oP 5 PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. ~TrT.~ nm xnw +' + + r + + - ..o PLANT $PAGNC DERAIL (SEC710N) ~~ / V F ""'"„ ~ - -] t _ ~ e ""A ~L~ ~ ~ R ~ _; ~~ 1 ~ .~ Ln N ~ w ~ ` ~ o•,~ ~, r a~ t ? ~ ~ ~ 4~ G ~ ~ ~; ~ ~~ GRAPHIC SCALE ~R em ]n ~~` \`~ cf°4.. er"p~id'~~r 'ppr \ ~4~la AJ \ ~ J ,\ ' '` r d o ._ _ -~. ~ r • 1 ~• • e• /• /• ~• /. ao 4A of /. e~ ;~ ~• ~a • d ~ ! O ~' -, •~ ; d ~ • ~~ J •~ . • ~ ~. ,I I • fir 1. /. ~ ~ oo ~~ I ~• i GEV-RA_ _AN75CA°E nOT.S $ 1. pl• wa.=we C.neacW .eM a~am O~Nq e.m, m rgiu.0. b pabp. pa.pbe a~a'a•p. aM 0~%. apbbpp ~ ~j ~; appA prv.l~v .~ D,e ~;~n o.mk ~mq~ mv~ ~ a LA.'w~ °M Mnt Fau.W t.ve,.".~]toroa"i ~ia~xu'i.xY Pl"°'"i ', ~ 1 x Ni paMe~e Man a m~. w, a~aMaM..xe b. ram xu,..,pn,.:. a,b m..r. A®uMb~..pp~a`.a pmams. {F~'+ a. ~ % aMM b brup]m Mu pmana ]o-,p-] bees e. w a...wm«an.n .peapm.iaa. w aoq~.iaum .pp s m.~ .our ~u n. a>pew~.b . ]w aat auaac •abmi w+•uro w p.~. ~oa..p ...•+t ~~wapwee ae ~ ~. ~ .om~ m ~ ~w.a m.m ~ mw r~am...~ :mom ea .w.~-n~a Win: n , men.. ~ yy d •~ pwMnp .ro..pm mow. a r N.~ M apa.. maws .~ • m e..a~.o-p, .,v. J ~ ~.i; ~ I T. m..~n b~,.,w _ .... r ,a a. aam.a•rc. w u. b^aa~aw aonpana.. m~. v ~ a e ecnemay ¢ ~`-f e., ab..ae M. pbm M• u. pep wo pmap. e. ~r'~.p~a u ``cm~M,. °~p .peam .o«mwiw.. .pr mn.nw a.e a.Mpa .p.~pa.m~• am a ~•..e } ~ .. ap r. ..p.n.. I`Vl p. >M~ew~ e~caawa~m Mm e~ w~^.m~i. ,m aamrrro ,by eMn M. vb app u. eb apapm.M. o~ Tr ,~.ma b M. bnp.mp. wab~, bv.]~m~lWw b > Npmq b ~Y. •• aaaeuM Mae M nape apn smpasl aanyMpap la Ilan b r.parl ~ ~~: . v . pan M U.. ln~aaup. mnwm N 1M tlm M LKGq. ~. ,p. W ~%~ tiaW. as M apcykW~ana. ae n.ruaaM1 aWaaaM. O.~alb atl Yniun b a.Nami n ,,. Pbnlea~M~mw h M .mnp ar Ma.ae. a wrva IYa. u• lana.aaa. araNbn ~ ~ ~ ,x. wn' ( ~) uwnb. ms.muq M. 4an rl artl/ar aio'IkoVan. tlm e. mr.eW b IM ianacaw MMaba1 ~ m s ,x .n u w ro .aanw.. menw. w .ip.umai. Mpwm u...np.n aawa~M M u• ome.. S C ,., rmxu. in .nunp, qam aumoemry ra a panm a MM (,]) meMn. rmm Aw a ampiw~ic. M ~ w~.~ eua 10. e'b. nea ~av,b b e`atl~ tN IaimaaM Cw,mclar Mia~ b barnw mM.na N.waWn. rcv+.w~.. Map N C! ~a .a e"0. ,.yn"°""°.p a M. w AaI,M'a.a'"~w. ~M paw ~';eup"a~. ~ m a ~°°'m„e>bb,`.i' ~~"~". ~ F ,). •n p.appe neawwy an b d pmnaea M nw pumWp aa.wcb uMar bmnp.. s.apaaH Mom a w ~~ is Na aaua<.w imnr<apan aW+ Mm n p.aan,.e an n. waiea+. •~~n, b w aaYn mmmuu aVr "' yp ip. 6bpNp .m .w0 D. mnanp m nrreary b acmamb r.. pam~. N 47 ip. Ny i.~Wnp am. uw an aMUMa auNp u. bbea.p. in.,aWan Mae a rxmaea ~pn u •upuun. 'ibnbm'. ]I. a mwnw'W l.r M aW.cp.n, r.inmol..Ib prtpr a.potl M aro ana di JMY u w ma,lew .mm nmp a .ae MM e..maw ~ q a a i 7 t~GA i ;;n vo _s u Di a m. e•pap.p ~.:~ w a pM~ae ,oo. aM.aa. ,. M p~awe.a a ~ ' wa~e.W.p~ e. a..a~a ~ eb a b. r.~,,,aab.. w ~ z w..a ]r.b~p n.aM n,.n w e.o..p m a pea.b. W .aa. ~ "awP a.p . Yu "map ea. w....p•....ammk pab ~ubK ~. u-a VPQ-G{ 4 x ppaapa, a.bm w a v ~ ~ ~ ~ ab c~am~«awMn~~~ C U ..oa ~~ iom .a.«aa~a wm. a Ar, ~ as w... ]-,xoxc ~z Ga3 G .. a4~a.~mww e. w'°e. ~daaw~ ~ m ~ v~'~ ry~ ~• ~x 9H S ~, ana pa....ww ra. M. & pM 1IWw4q 4rlVallon 4NUn camDaamb .A1 M uYpaC. pr wap manNxlw.n' MSbponp pubes CmlydnlpmC~Paa.paY FMXn Ieu amdc - tM RovkeVaM ~ ~ > nvl~s ~o..,p....,.,:~T,< eo ue u+w.wmAanewewTUtoa4,ooc w h wn.mavrq e•WNw vebrun]w,. Ren.)]saC ~ 0 G 6pu••BbM1BaMCap+e..]WLRti1.1]TO.C. (Tµl (~„IAI ONS ~' ~,]Aa,p~l aom..e ac imul 5 of 5 ISSUE DATE: 10.31.05 ~~t~D~NG Co~a~2S 0 1~-10.~V/'o.l l~o~~'eV' V"~Tl. (Z,oo~'~ Al~w,. base ~ ~ I G I tt,,11ln,~.Te ,naw~e „ /z+~ass fc~llndOwS b W ~ s ~ ~ l'20. 1. N a 0 61~ Ce~ Mass _ v~l,~a ~1~.~~ o ~~~'ev- 1`~`~eS ~ ' l5 L.ede~S - Ca~fac~QCv~ea.wt o ~,,'~tev ~~es .S - ~ (_eue~s ' Qav-c ~~Dvl0. ~ei~'2_. e (~ I~ ~ L o w ev- ~cc e~~s - ~~,~- ~ ~ II ,A A o G~v~[oaJl V"~~~, n ~0.55 Ka,~~l~c,.S f~i.~ll~s ~t,~ ~ PJ~V ~ 2 1005 t b L q~~e ~~~~n p a~~Q G,a~~~,. ~~.~~es - ~v~ce~a~ ~e1~~~'t ~1."'...,,~ -.~--,,,,-,-~-~~T 1 ~`sYf r•. ; ~~ ~ - G~~tta~. e- ~v-eaw~ sw 2 34~ ~<<~~ (.c~l~~~e Scc~2~Q3 L~,~ce~a~.ti (3~e~Q.e. sc~ 2osa I ~ar~a B(~~ Sw 22 62 ~,~~,1 131~e. ~..~ ~ 1, T ~~,? ~- R~~. 3~ •~ ..k t j ~~ _~ _ ~, ~ .rt .., ~Y; ~.~ r;,,~ . , ` ~ ( a,~ r r '-! ~' J~ ~ % : ~d% ~ ` F¢ ., ~„`. t f i to 'F 1+'~~~ ~. . 4 _. ~ ~'` •~ I ~tt~- ~. ~~... ~ l~ij 45 i . ' b I~ S ~p t~ ~-1 s _ L ~~ ~ .~.iF~. ~ .-a d~~ _: w.~,f ,,; f~.:; ~, i 1>'{°3 ~ CSC .. +.. ~ ~ t ,. ~ ~' Stir ,~ .w~ ~a, __.h /T ~ - 1 ~ 77 II ~J ~ l~ ~ 85 !~-~~ ~ ~~ 1 .2. _~ sa„~ aE [ 7 ~~ u ter, t »"e" iYt-i~ 7 ~ f ~~~ . 7 b ... + ! 4 1 ~ _. ~~ / y.f i ~-y f `, a ' Si rt e _t=''_.i i' • f ~~~'; ~ C~R..I G I~~l ~~L .. ~ S k j ~.9 ~ ~, , r` "~~ .~ ' w.~ ~ ~ . ,,.r ' ,d ~~ .~.~. ,,w, • ~~, ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ,~~~:... t ~~ { i ~ M ~. ~. f •±4 ~. ~. `\t -ti'~~~AM.f41FWP' ~ ~~ ~, i ~ tom,.,-.s i ~ ~~ Gillett Assoctiates ARDT GAOUP ~n~eaoao .: P+~s n ~ Samma.N4mi.lmdm ISai IO 3 ' m ~ 34736 941A37-4477 96tA57~4131 Fx • •.It~ ~. ~ ~ 7wMi ~ ~ w ~ ~i~i ~ ° ai i ~ w~otu~~ai s t ~ ~ ~4M i i fov r r s a i s +e4n~rnrina s. ~.r~.twie~4s vc~.~tlao~aNww rrt i~ C"-,, I ~ V ~. i~ ..... ~~~ ~ ~ C-~~~ ~ .~ ~ a C ~ =~ ) . . !\ J r- ~ O ~ - i s"'7' ' ~ -v . . v.J - °~ ~; ~- FF - t ~~ 1 ~~ ~~~ r ~ ...~ ~ ~i~rti~4 a ,.~ a b ~- SHEPHARD'~ ~ BEACH ~~~, RESORT '~ ~~ 619 S 61SlY~I SIAD '~~ ~ Cfi~Rlf~ Bdffi ~~~ ¢ g ' OIINBRf DBVSGOPSF IAIIJJA![ S~PHABI ' O ^ ~. '~ 'n X11 ~ ~ Sri r . a4ro~ 0 ®~r r Ig01 ~i ram. 1 11"N 20'-0" A1.01 • ~ ORIGINAL ~; ~~~ n 2 2005 ~i Q Q CIiV~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~•~ ,~ ~3U I ~ D I1~1C-1: ~4fi~~,4 t~4~l~~~t I Olds SPACES SUITES ENCLOSED BLDG TERRACE AREA lSF) GROSS PARKING LEVEL i 39 2'1'192 0 tYPiGAL LEVEL 2 31 2'1031 2310 tYPIGAL LEVEL 3 50 2b954 (d TYPICAL LEVEL 4 53 12 0 tYPICAL LEVEL 5 b 40 1455 TYPICAL LEVEL 6 10 12400 1290 tYPICAL LEVEL '1 10 12400 1290 TYPICAL LEVEL 8 10 12400 1290 TYPICAL LEVEL 9 10 12400 1290 TYPICAL LEVEL 10 10 12400 1290 71'PIGAL LEVEL 11 10 12400 1290 TYPICAL LEVEL 12 10 12400 1290 TYPICAL LEVEL 13 10 12400 1290 tYPICAL LEVEL 14 5 't410 3138 TYPICAL LE1/EL 15 2 RESIDENGEB 140 ~ X38 tOtAL BUILDINCs HOTEL SUITES : 91 SUITES + 2 RESIDENGE8 TOtAL ENCLOSED ~UlLD1NG Af~A: 235,2'tl tOtAL TERRACE AREA: 31,0b0 HOTEL PARKINCs: 1'13 BPAGEB CINCLUDINCx b HG) 0 ~_~ ~r ~ 73 24 7b 7i 71 ?8 Z9 SI I 9t 919 I 1 1 1 "~ _ `gr 0 51GI9A~ a 1 ~~ . G ~ ~ , b ~ ~ ! : L r--- - ~. `{~j + z ~ . ( ~ i ~ 4 '~ ~ ~J ~ I =7 ~! ~ I L41CRf l Y O Ir1LWli ~ ~ --- ~ _ D - ~ ~ O ( t - i ~ '" ~ , J __ 4 - w , f ' ~ . ~- ~ lil - ~__ _ __~ 1 1 J 1 --- - 1 9a - ~ ~ `'-3 ~i~ l ~ ~ srar~ Qb ~~ ~ Q. , I `___ -, --- 1 1 i 1 oatctl~calt ~ 4QO T 1 p ) 1 6 I-- T011~ - - - ~ ~''Q --- p1 y b I n~ wI ~ ?D f1 w.~ I~ ?? Y'J ~ ~* ~ a~ w~ ~e r------ i 1 ~fI Ia 1 - --- ~. ------ ~-- tam aeow,: ^~l , II ~~ r~ 11 \\ ~~ ~ 1\ 1 II j ti I _ ^ ` I A 6 K 6 Q i b 8 8 7 i b 4 s` I] Z I ~~ -~ ~ ~ e r~~i r r 1e~1e1 /G~NIl~ 1" = 10'-0" Gillett Associates ARD~r OROOP Amhittztae• Phoning 1s43-1m 2oasl~ S~95P1~ 34236 941-95/Ji151 Fa dd(~medt~ SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT 610 S GIIIl9~ BLVD QE~R11~!!QZ BatCH IBS 0_l-NBRjD ^ ~~'~onrrnrnae~~ ~ r . 4C.0' fraae ~a3r l~~li ~ i rsr r~rw ~ C1 A A r 6~ r :~ {~ R/ = 7 i. ~ lT I S` ~, ~ J w ~ + C '. J 9 1 t -3 `sa f ~ , ' ' \\\ \\\~\` .J~./y D G71ett Associates ARD~rG RO UP Aic6ixrnuc• P3L~mmmg 1343.1U1 god Snort Suveoe,9Pbrida 36736 SW1A57d131 Pa dd(dcwm SHEPHARD'C BEACH RESORT aio s wnrv~ ~,vn s~~ ae~ ~~ ~1fII,L1A~[ S~HAR 0~ ~.a". 1"° 10'-0" t aan°r~ieas'~ .ous r . ,ao- ~roa ~r >~ ~.. ~~ A2.02 ~ :~~, J ~~ ,~ ~. q = ~ ~ ~ -1,~ ~ f° ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ .~l ~ a ~ ~-- c ~ -~ - ~ s ~ -,-, _ , ~ cr E- -~ ni ~ r~ 0 c~ z r B~ p.00R PLAN r~~i ' ~ ~ 11"N 10'-0" Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP coaroasren Asl~ctu¢ •• Ph~aniug 15A'.101 ?nd Saset Snmeom, [7ocda %2i6 94fA57MT! 941A57Af51 Fa dd~ndtcom 'I SHEPHARD'c BEACH RESORT eis a su~sv~ min crum-~ ~ >~~ OIINER ~~ o>,n oarc~s ~ ocr,roe~ aoa ~, r~1 >~ ~. A2.03 • '~ r ' '~ n ~ ~'. -., : ` ~. -~ ~; ~ C ~~ ~. ~ ~j P'~"+ i i~ .. c.ri r t r.. ~,i ~~ ~ 1~ /~r~ V ~ D 0~ ~r 11"M 10'-0" Gillett Assodates ARD7 OROUP ~a~~'o.no~Yl'°°~m`~E ss4i1m ~a s~ s.~,P~ sazss 941A57-1477 941.951 1111M~~ ~ NM111 SHEPHARD'~ BEACH RESORT eio s sLVn Qa~sv~ sa-ca ~ta~ • ~I Ol-NBR/D~~ o~R ocr~>4s~ • onuror sou. weta r . w.a sioas lial ~~,~ A2.04 Gilletx Associares ARD~r GROUP o.weno Ashitecmae •• P 15411012m1 Sweet SSA Florida 94236 941A57~477 941-957.4151 Fa dd®@'I4lamdttam \~ ~± ~ , ~ , ~ , ~y ~ ~ ; ~ ~=tiJ ~ {. . ` 1 L f~.T Ca ~. ~ +_ f ~~ , ~. ~ a Jyi , \ / ~~ IgIM ~~ . ~1 f~t~i ' i I 1'sM 10'-0" ~~. ~~ SHEPHA.RD'S BEACH RESORT 6fl9 8 60f~P16r HLYD . QE~81f~YEg NCH ll~.- • OIINBR S~PHHSR Dl1Ti OC1~71 ~~ ~~ ~~ )(LX ~~~~~ A2.05 P C `~ 800 6 >.. 800 ,~ A '"~ 1100 .+... ~.. 1Rr ~ ~~ ~~~ -~ d n.«. .~... -- 9~ 919 "' -. } u n L_J ii it ~ J~r ~~~~ l ~ s~~ i n ~ ~, ~~ ~ w~ot ~~ ~7 ~~ t ~' Cf j ~ a ""'~ e~ "" ~ 800 ~ ~` t C 900 ~' D J (^„-~~ `- ..~.-- ..... ' ,~... ~" i ~~ .~ ~- ~ t~ .... f., ~ B~ p.001? PLAN r~i~i~ s r K71A1 WMttt6 1" = 10'-0" Gillett Associates ARD6 6ROIIP An.1~:....~+.. p~.,,,,,,,,, So.oe~EUmf-7cv~bn $amaon, Florido 34216 %1-957-9471 • 941A574151 Pa i ~ I SHEPHARD'~ BEACH RESORT 61Y S ~ BLiD QE~~ BEACH 1~ i lO~~ ~ o .r°w ~oos'~ 910AL6 r . 70`-0 snot r>ra>t lQIPJL ~S/ H 771fET r~~A ~~ na ~~ D G 900 800 '"' B ~,. .~~ 8~ ~~ er r a ' "` ..~ ~. ,. n00 ~ wry w ar ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ..... '~ . Y11 P _ ^ L J M r 1 r~*~''I ~~~"~ 1 N ;° ~~ ~/ l._J ~1 V V y H ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~. ! .r.. ~, ~ ~s a .a '"`~ i_ _ s i ~ l , 8 00 i..i~ .r.. _ i p ~~ ~.~' ~ 800 ... .. i ° C 900 F t ; -~ ~ iy ~ ~~~_._ Jrr v O V ~ D B~ Pl.OdR PLAN .:~~ 1"~ 10'-0" Gillett Associates AADT OROUP [A..~tiv'.,~... Smwn.ML® 1543101 ~d Stvsc S 34736 941.957 ~. SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT ~o a w~vgs mvu G'tbSlf~ BdCH !lA~ID1 I01lNSti BVSIAPSf SHSPHABI ~o..mw~~ aoua r . wow irons nur ~,~.-~, .~,..... A2.07 ^ ~ ~.~ ~,~ -; ~_ ~ ~ ~ E' -~ ° ~ ~, e~ t: . © ~ . ..,, ~ ~., _ _- ., ~ ~ ~ -. d~. , .l ~ \ / O 1 I 7 ®~ ~1.OOR PLAN ri~~i~ r r It#1 11"=10'-0" Gillett Assodates ARDT GROUP .~dm ]5431012vdSuea Suneoe~Pl®dn 34236 441-957-4477 941-957151 Fa ddodcwm • SHEPHA.RD'c BEACH RESORT 619 8 CIIflP~ ffiAD l~~ B~CH lID1tIDi- o~ ^ o~n oclaml;tee O ~aw+>~ eta r . we Boas r~r >~.~>~ A2.08 9 1~ J 7 Cs1llCCC ASSOC18tCS A$D~ G ROU P A ~ ~~ wm l ~ Svn lP dn 34296 941AS1-44T/ 941-95I-4151 Fa SHEPHARD'~ BEACH RESORT 619 8 60lJYlE~ HLYD Qt-SIf11EB BE-CH >R~a1 ~~ s • ~ ~. ~ } __- ~• = ~ ~ i ' ~ ~ ~ ~ p~g~~ AR ~ `~ t ~~9 ~ ~ .~ lIII3dA$ S H gd ~. ~ ~ f ~ ' rv q ~ c.r~ ~ . ; , , .~ ~ n O oouriw aea +„j ~ s ~ ~ ~~>. ~~ B .Q....... .. " i ~ A2 09 i ~ o~-o . >, ~ ~. ~. p ~ +, ~ ~ c ~~ SC ` ~! f' , ~ . f ~ - .. ! ~ w ~ ~~~ SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT 610 S 614lYiR- ffiAD (~EISII~'~ 1~ItS lI~HD~ O1fNER~DS~~ ~w1~ ~~ ~ ~rur ~~ mars 1"N io'-o.. A2.10 0~~~/ V i9 - '•'~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ .,,r _ ~ ~ 1. .~ t b 1 ~ ~ _, ~ ; ,C ~ ~ l ~,: ` - j .~ ~ ~_ l - ~ C.71 ~ R ~J Gillett Associates ARD~T~G RO UP Axdtiaettu¢ •• PJmuiog i5~a54}'10P1 Ada 34736 941.957-4477 941-9574157 Fa ddQ~dt.aom SHEPHARD'~ BEACH RESORT 619 S 6~lY~ ffiVD CTEIBIf1!'i~ HE~CH !!~~ I ~~ SH~HARI ^ o~~ ~ aoae r . ,ar ~ ttor~r .~..... A3.01 • s 7 ~~ CT1ILGt[ ASSOCI3LCS ARDT GROUP reoarox.rao ~ A..d.im.,... ISi}IO! 2od Smx~ --~~ ~ ~~./ 957-4~477~ • 941-957-a151LFa~ --JM~ V ~~ --ice ~/y ~+.. _-~~ r 1 •r~~.xrr ~~I.IR - --'~~' -. ._-.~L~ , f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~--- _ --.,.~ SHEPHARD ,. BEACH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - --~ RESORT --i'~ 61Cl~lRlf~'1~ H6~CH !!D~ - --„"~ • ii ~~ a o o a ~ a~ ~p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q --- -- --- - d _ 1 _ -71i- y . ~ . • ~ N L,.. i ~ ^ Y ~ • ' _ ~ CJ ~1 (_ t DINE ~ ~ ~~~~ f . ~ i• ~ --------~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ mt 1~ J .Q...... A3.02 i k i I r'7 Gillett Associates ® AAD~T ORO UP ~~• 3~u.rA®aa,mn 1543-1012od Snc~ Sumeota, Plouda 36236 941-957-4177 941-9574151 P~ dd(n~tdtoom ~_^ I111~. ~ 1~~ SHEPHARD'c BEACH RESORT ~o s so~vgs ~vn ~ra~rn~ ea~ca on~~ ~>i . ~,~.>~. .~ *.,~.~ .~>~. .~ ,...e. A3.03 i F~ ~ -- ~. .~ ~ `., .,~ ; ` C t ~ 1 ~ 1 ` ' + t`. 7 ~ ~ can ~ ;,. ~ 's.~ = _.. ~1 ~.._/ ^ ~~~~ o ~p o I~ o~ o~ o i u Gillett Associates ® AADir ORO UP Aschi2ctum • 4JaminB s~,.n~.1ma„ tsasla~ lad sare~ ~-- Saaaoq Pbcda 34736 941-9n-un _--- 941-957-4151 Pa . _ 7~ r--- ,,...,........ SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT R19 3 6Ql1i16~ )IIAD CfE~Btf11'!~ BE~CB )E(BYIO- o~ ^ ~„_ ~r- s aoua r . w.r awe a-mae rear rarw A3.04 Co~„t eo~ WI.E . ~~"` 1P S~-Qp~~ TDI° C.o Look. SOT Cal~ss P~~Is ~/ ~~~ i`~°_~ ,~ . ~~ ~~ ) ~ ; f •J "~ .. ~ J ~~ - r `~ y ~KV~QK[Q(~ ~,St P~k~-~~ C,k~, ~ ~ .a • ;~~ ,. ~Lo~~ P~.~I~~K°~ ~,..-{r~ ~ r v~ < te. ~~~~ ~G~ C }~ > ~.. ~ ;~ 3 f ;mil ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ,' ,_ a ~ ,.- i~ ` J l f{do~~l ~T ~e IA,b `5 ORIGINAL NOV (~ 2 2005 ~~ ~ ~ w .~ LVL~_I 1 s J1 ,,, ~ ,,. r, ^•'° v ~4'Y WlhICaGUI C:+>t7AII- G U.tl ld,l I I lwrlram I ~_ ~r_ ~_-TTY.-~ - - uh f"' ! ~~~~,, ~~ - ~ ;~ ~~. .~. ~4._ . .c~ _, ~K_ 1 ___ ,~FCf _ _ ,~. _;~ , ~I o - - ~~ ~; ~ ~ Q~ •I ~'"-i 4 ,r ~ 6 1~1' ;~ L' l ~ ' . ~-- I a{ ki 1 ~ F! '~k ' a ~, , ~ t i ~ _~ P ~~1! -r.-}p .~, "f ,j--a, ^~' ~i u -1. .. ~ -4-i: U ' ;ii ;IW11GIi[~WG ~~.)' 0lpfAfffi. ~ '1 if: i ^~ u, '.,,. ~. ~`aw~,~~.a.i `II I r..~ ~~ .-,. f ~_ ~ I:~~._.__.__._ I; Ci7 I ~~ I °t ~.-1 '~ kLraAitiRfi mbgr, If ~ I I;~' J r i~ 1~.-iy:-_..'!~~ -... 4. ~.:",~_...__..~_.-__...~-.. -emu.-.. .-._:.~t. - -. 1'Ro li 1F8'~.6"-6 1J6' ~~V VR PLUM / 9ct, FLOOR oT.CIR:~ 2R ~ 6 7/1('.:'-.A ~tfl" ORIGINAL r~ ~ ~ ~ } ,~ u~ I . t~ ~ .. .~~ .J NOV d 2 20Q5 PL~,~~-1~~'~" ~°~'^~-~'T~J • Tree Inventory Shepha~°d's Beacfi Resort, Inc. Clearwater, Flo~°icla Prepared by Alan Mayberry For: Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. C~ oRIG/NAB October 26, 2005 The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist, and includes findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and my report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of Keith Zayac & Associates and will not be given to other entities unless so directed. Site Overview and Tree Canopy Analysis The subject site is commercial property located on Clearwater Beach. The site consists of a variety of palm species growing in landscape islands within parking lots or in landscape buffers adjacent to parking lots. The species include the native sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) and several exotic palms including the Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta), California fan palm (Washingtonia filifera), Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata), Bottle palm (Hyophorbe lagenicaulis), Coconut palm (Cocos nucifera), Alexandra palm (Archontophoenix alexandrae)', Pygmy date palm (Phoenix roebelenii), Royal palm (Roystonea regia -native to South Florida), Queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana}, and Foxtail palm (Wodyetia bifurcata). The palms in general have been pruned too hard and would benefit from a fertilization and irrigation program that targets the need of the individual species. However, with a few exceptions they are still sufficiently healthy to warrant preservation or transplanting on site. All trees and palms with an overall condition rating of 3.0 and above on the following inventory are considered worthy of preservation or transplanting. Tree Inventory Data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could Lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. -The tree inventory lists four codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the data used in the inventory: Tree# -location -Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that -~ corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the ee°in~e~ field. ~~~~~~ ~~ gnu ~ 2 2005 PLAN(~I~~t; l~EP~lRTj~~ENT CITY OF C,L~-~~a~~TER l~nv ~ 2 2~~5 p R I G I f~ A L PlANN1~~G I~EF,'~~i ~l~E(VT Size -Tree size is a measure of the~tre'e's`~z~.fk~ariiefer z~easured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.). Species -Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. Condition Rating -The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood; split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included bark. Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used}. A tree with good systemic health will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing energy. The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows: 0- A dead tree 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). Atree with a rating of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2 - A tree exhibiting serious structural defects. such as codominant stems with included bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, .crown dieback, cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as law energy, Iow live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s) can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating. 3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon • • ORIGINAL have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4- A tree with a rating. of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree - should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5 - A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation. 6 - A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (LS.A.) Certified Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree. Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree. N®TE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3-5 years. However, events such as drought, .lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance. and severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely affected, have the tree inspected by a qualified International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist. Note: Whenever possible it is advised to adhere to inventory recommendations when selecting trees to be preserved. For example, trees rated 4.0 and higher should be preserved if at all possible, while trees rated 2.0 and lower should be removed unless otherwise noted in the inventory. Trees rated 2.5 are generally recommended for removal unless remedial work is performed to upgrade them. Trees rated~3^:O~anr1~35~ are average ~~~~~~~~ NOV 0 2 2005 PLANN~&~~ i~C~~'~~~'o~E~lT ~ ORIGINAL trees that have good potential and Tarrant serious consideration for preservation but not to the extent that site plan modifications are~necessary. This tree inventory was coa~ducted on October 26, 2005. NOTE #I: The tree survey prepared by the site surveyor identifies several palms that have less than 10' of clear trunk. Palms with less than 10' of clear trunk are not protected by the City of Clearwater code and consequently are not included in the following tree inventory. The palms are identified on the attached site plan with the initials NP (not protected). NOTE #2: The tree survey prepared by the site surveyor identifies several palms that are in landscape buffers of adjacent properties. These palms were not included in the following inventory as their root systems are contained within planters and they will not be affected by future construction activities relative to the subject property. NOTE #3: Trees and palms with a condition rating of 3.0 or greater are considered worthy of preservation or transplanting on site. Trees and palms with a condition rating of less then 3.0 are not recommended for preservation and are followed by a comment section that describes the arboricultural reasons justifying the rating. Tree Inventory Tree # Size 1 12' C.T. 2 20' C.T. 3 18' C.T. 4 14' C.T. 5 16' C.T. 6 14' C.T'. 7 12' C.T. Species Rating sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 3.5 Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 4.0 Washington palm 4.0 sabal palm 3.5 sabal palm 3.5 sabal palm 3.5 sabal palm 3.0 NOTE: Palms #8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 31, 35 & 36 are located on the publicly owned right of way of Gulfview Boulevard but were planted by the property owner as a street tree design and as such are included in this tree inventory. 8 10' C.T. foxtail palm (Wodyetia bifurcata) 9 10' C.T. foxtail palm ---, -, ~ ~~ ,, r'.~i. ~f 3Li r ~_ 3.5 1, ~ ~ `. ~.~-, ~ ~%.'.~' 3.5 NOU 4 2 ~QQ5 CITY OF C~.E~~~~~TER • • ORIGINAL 10 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 11 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 I2 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 13 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 14 11' C.T. Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata) 3.5 . 15 9" Seagrape (Coccoloba uvifera) 1.5 Comments : The con dition of this tree is downgraded due to the presence two large basal wounds with decay located on the trunk within 2' of the grade. 7' above grade there is ,a gaping wound where a large branch has been torn from the tree. In addition, the crown is thinning and has die back present. Recommend removal. 16 30' C.T. Washington palm 4.5 17 13' C.T. coconut palm (Cocos nucifera) 4.0 18 13' C.T. coconut palm 4.0 19 28' C.T. Washington palm 3.5 20 12' C.T. coconut palm 3.5 21 30' C.T. Washington palm 4.5 22 40' C.'T. Washington palm 4.5 23 14', 17', 18' C.T. Senegal date palm {cluster) 3.5 24 40' C.T. Washington palm 4.5 25 28' C.T. California fan palm (Washingtonia filifera) --~ --.., R-, ~3.5 ., : __, ~- ~1 .. ! , 26 16' C.T. California fan palm 5.0 nR~V (D 2 zQQ~ 27 15' C.T. royal palm (Roystonea regia) 4.0 pl~~~':~'~ ~L?~ ^'~~~~lT ~ 28 15' C.T. royal palm 4.0 Cl'!Y QF ~~ ~~,.~'~T"~~f~R 29 16' C.T. royal palm 4.0 ~ ~ ORIGINAL 30 10' C.T. Senegal date palm 5.0 31 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 32 10' C.T. coconut palm 4.0 33 10' C.T. coconut palm 4.0 34 10' C.T. coconut palm 4.0 35 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 36 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 37 8" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 2.5 Comments: This tree is located 3' south of the sidewalk of Gulfview Boulevard and is growing in a 6' wide landscape buffer between the sidewalk and parking lot. The tree is downgraded due to the presence of a codominant stem with included bark in the main crotch located 4.5' .above grade. The codominant stem situation is compounded by the removal of a 4" diameter branch that once formed a tri-dominant formation at this point. The decay resulting from the branch removal will further weaken the affected area. The crown has average live crown ratio and below average form due to excessive pruning and competition from adjacent plants. Recommend removal. 38 17' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 39 15' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 40 12' C.T. coconut palm 2.5 41 n/a coconut palm 0.0 Comments: This palm has no top, is dead and needs to be removed and replaced. -. ,~ - ~ ~ 42 12' C.T. coconut.palm 3.5 R `~ - `- _,~ .-'w 43 12' C.T. coconut palm 3.5 ~~~ ~ 2 ZQQS 44 12' C.T. coconut palm 3.5 pLA~I,'~~~+u ~~~,, ~--,,i,~~T 45 11' C.T. coconut palm 2.0 ul1 Y ~~~~ ~~ ~',' ~~'a,~'~~~ Comments: This palm is suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies to the extent that it is likely beyond treatment. Recommend removal and replacement. ~ ~ ORIGINAL 46 28' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 47 11 C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 48 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 49 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 50 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 51 11' C.T. foxtail palm 3.5 52 15' C.T. queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 3.0 53 18' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 54 16' C.T. queen palm 3.0 55 15' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 56 14' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 57 16' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 58 27' C.T. coconut palm 5.0 59 24' C.T. Washington palm 4.0 !!1, ...1~ ~-_~ - ' ;_ n~~v o ~ 2005 ~ ~ OR161NAL STORMWATER liTARRATI~E The Shephard's project area includes the new construction area of 1.46 acres. The existing site contains approximately 0.97 acres of impervious area which will be demolished and removed from the site. The proposed site contains approximately 1.08 acres of impervious area including a building, driveway and brick pavers. The stormwater requirements for the site include the treatment of the first 0.75 inches of runoff prior to discharge into the Gulf of Mexico. The proposed stormwater treatment system includes a normally dry treatment pond located in front of the site and an underground Cultec Recharger 280 system. The pond and underground system together provide a volume of 4,469 cu-ft which exceeds the 3,975 cu-ft required. The pond and Cultec systems are detailed on sheet 4 of 5. Nnv ~ 2. 2005 .ZAYA OC -2005 P.E. N0.4~192 - Page 1 ~ Z Stormwater ealcs 10-31-05 ' ti.. ~ . .~~._.~~,r. ~'J ...... CITY OF CLEARWATER " Shephard's A!~U ~ 2 2005 STORMINATER CALCULATIONS 10/30/2005}~P ~i 1 1 L.~""1174.d~'?~ Ir .~li'am~~~...'~~~ 1 Required Treatment ~$~~ ~ ; ~l . ~, ,,~ ... _,~ Acreage Square Feet 3/4 inch Cu Feet Acre Feet '~ ~--ra~~. ~t..~,~ 1.460 63597.6 0.75 3975 0.091 <Amount needed to treat. 3 Pond. Volume Pond To Elevation Pond Bottom Elevation: Area of Pond at To EI. Area of Pond at Bottom Side Slo Increment 5,00 Water table 2.5 3.00 2,203.00 0.0506 K sand ermeabilt ,ft er hr : 1.66 366.00 0:0084 4 Safet Factor dimensionless : 2 0.50 le„9 V AVG. FLOW AREA OF AVERAGE 0T ET TOTAL ENGTH THR HYDRAULIC OND BOTTO FLOW FLOW INCR. TOTAL VOLUME OND BOTTO GRADIENT A=(L)(h) Q=KiA (Q1+Q2)~2 TIME TIME (cf) (ft) i=h/~eV9 (~) (cfh) (cfh) (hrs.) (hrs.) 2 56 9 2.00 1.1 25 366.0 341.8 0 0 _ _ 2353 2.00. _ '1~~.075 366.0 326.6 334.16 . 0.646 0.646 -~~-2147~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~ 2.00 ~~-~~~~~-1.~025~~~~~~~-+~ 366.0 311.4 ......._..._w. ......,...._... .318.97 .._..................................... 0.647 ................_..........._..., 1.293 .....1949............_...., 2.00 '-...~..,..0975...._~~~~~~~ 366.0 296.2 ~ ~~~303.78 ~~ 0.650 1.943 ~~-1761...........-~-~-~~ 2.00 ~~~~~~~~~~0.925~~~~~ 366.0 281.0 288.59 0.652 2.595 • E h~ 0h ELEV. TOTAL HEAD I NCR. HEAD (NGVD) (ft) (ft) 5.000 2.250 0.100 4.900 2.150 0.1 4.800 2.050 0.1 ......._.._ ..................~. 4.700 ._.... ..,._....,.............w.,....................... 1.950 .,.,.....,,.............,...,.......... 0.1 4.600 1 850 0.1 ..........._......_....._... 4-.500 .,,....... _.._..........,.....,_.,.,.......~...... 1.750 ~ ................_...,.....m_,..... 0.1 4.400 1.650 0.1 4.300 1.5.50 0.1 4.200 1 4b0 0.1 4.100 1.350 0.1 4.000 1.250 0.1 3.900 1.1.50 0.1 3.800 . 1.050 0.1 3.700 0.950 0.1 1582 2.00 0.875 366.0 265.8 27340 0:655 249 3 ; '~~~~1413.,,.....,.-~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2.00 ~~~~~~~~~~~ 0.825 ~~~~~~ 366.0 250.6 ^,,,,,,, ~~~~~~258.21 ,,,,,,,,,,,, ..,,,,, 0.658 ,,.,,,,,,., ...,,.,.,.. , . 3.907 1252 2.00 0.775 366.0 235.4 243.02 0.661 4.568 Q ......,........,...................,.......,. 1101 2.00 .w_..,....._..............,....._., 0.725 366.0 220.2 ............._.._._.........._.. 227.84 . ~ 0.665 5.232 ~ 958 2.00 0.675 366.0 205.1 212.65 0.669 . 5.901 -~~ 825 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2.00 ....,,..."0.625 ~~~~~~~~~~~ 366.0 ~ 189.9 197.46 0.674 6.575 _.....701........_.._~~~~~~~~ 2.00 ,,..........,0.575......-~~~~ 366.0 174.7 182.27 0.680 7.254 167.08 0.686 7.941 151.89 0.694 8.635 ...............w,,,.,.,,,,.,..,..,.. ,........~.....,...,......,...,.,.,..,.......,..............................,....._.,,...... ~,_ Page 2 Cultec 280 system provides 2,520 cubic feet of storage from elevation 3.00 to pipe invert elevation of 4.70. Total storage = 2,520 cu-ft (cultec) + 1,949 cu-ft (pond) = 4,469 cu-ft total > 3,975 cu-ft required Stormwater caics 10-31-05 "A "~ .. ~~ \~I, ~._ I e 1~ ~ ~ t , 1 ~ ~ ~~ >~ e ~) ~, w ' ~ 1 3 1~ i 1 {~ f ..~ /~ ~.°7 ~/ ~ i~ ~r~ i 88131936 ~~ ~' -~ ~urtNauN rurr, tQJUU'L/VU3 1 a~~7s~~ «~ ~ o R i G ~ 1 SAL ' ~r IC.ierdJ d6Jw, `dol c{. ~li•.._ ..t- U. IMF tg .6> ltilltas N. Shepha[d ~alpret7r.h. tlltlttr K. Ehepha[d, as 1Ynstee aMar the p[ovieions of the shephacd lardy 7cnet llgteseAt. dated Pebcuacy 29, 19t{. knawa as the thvphud Fgl1y 1Yrst ~r~l••t•~k•~~ab t19 Ha1Nie4 llvd., Cleacvater, 11 I{6l0 aK1Ml tral/ (•Yw..r rt Mi a..... -r.,. }ry' ..a ~....a rM' Arr " ' ~.~..d aa.•d -.~ 4J w ~.~w .~ ~~. d F4Y.L. +/ r,r .ww~ rt min. A ~p.wiwti Js...r M wry ..r•.t )~ ~Y. IMa 1~ Y~ 7~w ~7. I°. r~ M L'YiMd~ .~ lly .YR ~Is ~t~ Ir 11•rl p11 ~ /!tr aald aaaorl /CIF. IRr .•011/R ~ •~/ tMJ.V,~1.~ .f`.M ~[/1~1 ~) M IF ~• ar.t •X<~Or aa.f• ILr ~ ar•M~l J~F ~ ~ 11.1 ..~[. ~[. 4ttenm4 a/daa and 1..M11~1 ~e~ 1~r aatl rMt Fa.I1 L.. fw ~ M ILr ~ ~a {.t. Ffeoa a• F•K'1 •1 two. dtarte. ~f a..l ~.M f a. e1K C•~b •/ Piaellae $~..( ilocida , twN: Bet atlibit •A• attached hete~n. Description, Order 1 Ca lull pores and aathocity 1s granted by tMLs deed to said 2[eatee of hie saoceer ors to protect. oonaecw, sell, lease, Lrprost, to coarry altMc with « rith- aat caulderation, to sotbgage, pledge, of otetvise ercasber said propectY and to ewtaye asd dispose of the real property ~ awy part of it deecrfbad ie thls saootdet iaetrerseat. tAlbjeot tr cestetattans aad sae4rrats= or teeocd_ twb~eCt to tAat cettafn aoctgage prsaertlY held nY the lark of Qaactiatg. a state IMdclag asaoatatiw !a the prlwCipal ser of S{tlS,t)OY dated lebcwcy 2t, lft3, aId t:11d tisrch 4, 13!13 it Ol S11{ pry! 1SSS of tDe pablia Mcords o[ Piaellaa Oorrty, TLx Lda. pis propectT t~ aot horeateed property. ZM Q[aaator resides at S00 llaf! viw t7cive, nellair liuttr, riocida. Y'ftIS OfBa IS !OR lAR PUltOati t! ~CiLi/ ~ ~ a _SIp':PNl11p . RlItItL! tRpS! J1~6tt6DOOe! 111~(X iAOIiLD It Pff1101NCY ZSr 1~ q!S _~~j'9 ~ A~ KGOIItItll i DOC WAIFS 2 ~p art sad V 3i~f a..r.ar .~.,+... ~ .r ...r ..~..~ ~ ,o,r.w-.-a~o--r~.~.~. j•~•f .- w e+s+ra rvs•~e~+an. e~ .Et t-b atrtt atoLt ti14. Jtiie•d.~iQG~d~.WR7~,RY.W- •...+ a{ ti: aril /Fp1 rr+s. aillar /r l.. ««ptls. ~+ tlr ~' F+YR eaa. 6ar~t anal ~.iaG/~Lta srll aarrwl F.,y ja.aaai Tta oral ji.I r..y /~ stMr! ay.l aatilrl tt... F'••"•I• tL. ~ awl FM j.,a .b.+ ...r.. Srp.ad l ..l J.i..~d r. :• ~~_~ trsr,41a11 tl. sltt ~~ - .... • ,. ": tr.-is a l1AR~ - ~; mutmr a Paaart r .a: rr:. t Intatsr au~rlrr ~~ « ah ~, t.si~.aaar~a rlt.r..y ariadad : # scar air.~aL ar{ f• rr Q•-..fi.~r ...~..s....-:~•, ,•~•,r' ~~'`~ xiurw 11. smrrlu-ln F'• ~ ``~ r .~. -...aa r M i~a p.n. ~eamlr h, ,d..a. aee..ed I-[ a"+sa~ j••n.ir a.a ~ «~`•rie~.l ldaw we ~ ~ earcae~ /i• a..e_ M171f13[ aq -.r{ ad a1Fda! rat it V llaay a.~^i ai.rr:t ,~ .~i •~.~'f :q ii ~_ a. A. N S11.Qt ^~^-~1 c .~t.w. ~k~L~~~S.ffs.~~_ [- --- ---...•~~ a ta.. Loa iraa ifa~s ~ nea.r~aaay T~ ~ t... ~!~._.... G w~.fl.iMltt~ ~r... ~~..... ~,.na a.a Pinellas,FL Document-Book.Page 6?58.1631 Page: 1 of 2 ~.,_~~=~---~.~~ mmenf: f.& _: c,~ ,~.: ., _ ~~ ~a. ~~Y ~'~J ~'~~ n ~~~~z~ ~;~t1 ~ 1. fi Li:, ~ C~i1f C~ ~~ ~ ~, . ~~:~ °~ gds LOCAL bYSQfltIoiF _ -~-. pR6758PG 1632 Loc. ] firs S, 11oet 'C', lalsida s.bdi.isioa IS, accordla~ to ti. ..r ar rlat siaceot u reootdsd is rlat seat Ss, raR« 1s aas 37, r.-lie taaarU s[ riaelia. Oosaq, [iortda, asd tiKk st tie ltortl- watocll eonsc eE LK 1, slode ~C', selal4e tsbdil-trioa fs, p toeordsl ]s~?1st syak 1i, rspa la ss~ 19, K tAs rubiin lsoordr K riuliq Lbaag llaridat tti..e.. wcth Sf doit+aaa zs• so`v, is.lt Cwt siors tM sartiaril 1las of pit soalnaed{ twras fostL 12 daYtwr 40' 001f, ad purallal to tLt Y«tuil tio.adaq of tia Nii Lot 1, Clock 'C', Mlaide Sddi+iai.a fS, a fi~toco ~eaa~aq ~ 2K feat to tia rotors ox C3NSwtsr ssl tsl tMaoa sartull aLsf ttia Lea lfse of Cl«nrator tR 67 E«t •rt+ ac low to tia latataae- tfoa d tba aioa 1l~a of C3M~.ater sal aat tLa il«ter17 ioaa~tarl 1iw st wLd iat 1, iLd~ 'C', salalde fa-tiriatea H, owes Neett 11 ~ 4A' f0't. sleas Lba 9utacll -earier! of tb acid Lot 1, fleck `C', leryrih #ti!Ittiates fs, 2!s teat rr[e ar bras to tM rout of laOtwlaf. Q.etioa L7, le.etts !! teac-, lseOs is Dqt, riaauas Ooadl, nerida. -~'J Vri1vJV1V rVrC l~/~VVJ/VVS ORIGINAL Best dopy Av~i~la.ble,. ,~ `„ i ,- . -~ ~ ~ h J . ,~, ,~ ~ ~, ~;.'''~ ~ 2 24p5 Ci`~ Description: Pinellas, FL Document-Book Page 67`58.1631 Page: 2 of 2 - - -> . • -~._ Order. 1 Comment .~Q~ i~/g [ ~I i/ 'V • oeiciNa~ FLD2005-11108 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD Date Received: 11/02/2005 SHEDARDS BEACH RESORT ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 285A ~~~1 ~ 2 2005 p~t~R~fi~C ~F~~~~~~~NT CITY OF CiFA~~~;~~Ff~ PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet S~C,ALa 11/2/200s ''I`' ~ Receipt #: 1200500000000010957 11:ss:3sAM ~ ~= r Date: 11/02/2005 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD200s-11108 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,20s.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check SHEPHARDS BEACH RESORT R_D 5606 In Person 1,20s.00 Payment Total: $1,205.00 c~~C~~9Q9r~D ~!f?V (~ 2 2005 PLAi~NING ~EPARTMENr CITY OF CLEAR~IIATER THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 ~OPE BOKOR RUPPEL & BU~ LLP JOHNSON, , ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.• GUY M.BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T.CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKYFERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RYAN C. GRIFFIN MARION HALE REBECCA L. HEIST SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.* SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A.LARSON ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIH-PIN LU• MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL BRETON H. PERMESLY F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL CHARLES A. SAMARKOS KIMBERLY L. SHARPS JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON 'OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE N0. September 6, 2007 Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner iii City of Clearwater Planning Department P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: FLD2005-11108/TDR2005-11028 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard Dear Wayne: Please be advised that this firm no longer represents the applicant with regard to the referenced case. By copy of this letter, we are forwarding your letter dated September 4, 2007 directly to the applicant for handling. Very truly yours, JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPE URNS, LLP E. D. A mstrong III encl. cc w/encl: Mr. William M. Shephard, Trustee #414556 v1 CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 9] 1 CHESTNUT ST. 403 EAST MADISON ST. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33 75 7-1 368) SUITE 400 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-1100) TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 TELECOP~R: (813) 223-71 ]8 • • ~wa~ A rte: .. d9 ~,. ~;4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT I'TS' ®~ LEARWI-ATE R POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 September 4, 2007 E. D. Armstrong, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 Re: FLD2005-11108/TDR2005-11028 619 S. Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Armstrong: On November 2, 2005, the above applications were filed with this office. A letter of incompleteness was sent on November 7, 2005, and amended on November 8, 2005. The applications are still incomplete. No resubmittal has been received to-date. Unless a complete resubmittal of the necessary information (one original and 14 copies of the application package) is received by this office by noon on October 1, 2007, these applications will be deemed withdrawn. Alternately, prior to this date you may submit a letter withdrawing these applications from further consideration. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 727-562-4504 or wayne.wells(a,myclearwater. com. Sincerely, Wa e M. Wells, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentiCD BIFLEX (FLD)IlncompletelGulfview S 619 Shepard's Beach Resort (T & OSR) - WWILetter to E. Armstrong re status of application 9.4.07.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER ~~EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER~~ `Clearwater November 08, 2005 E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757 1 RE: FLD2005-1 1 108 -- 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-11108. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Revise Page 1 of the application to include Parcel #17-29-15-00000-220-0100. 2. Revise Sheet 3/5 to add Parcel ID 17/29/15/00000/220/0100 and to revise the Present Use to a 96 overnight accommodations. 3. Sheet 3/5 -The area south of the seawall is zoned OS/R. Need to indicate such zoning on this sheet, as well as the acreage zoned Tourist and the acreage zoned OS/R. Ensure the site data table indicates in "J. Overnight Accommodations" that the required (maximum number of units) is based on that.area zoned Tourist. 4. Sheet 1/5 -Revise Project Location map to the proposed site (map currently indicates north beach, not south beach). 5. Exhibit B refers (many places) to an existing 97 room/unit hotel, however, Room 102 was remodeled to a keg storage room in 2004, reducing the number of rooms/units to 96. Revise all locations of Exhibit B. Also revise Sheet 3/5 under "3. Present Use" and "18. J. Overnight accommodations: Existing." 6. The survey does not indicate the flood zones affecting the property. Sheet 3/5 indicates that the property lies within the "VE" Flood Zone. However, checking with Doug King in our Engineering Department, the property lies within the AE-12, VE-13, VE-14 and VE-16 Flood Zones. Revise. 7. The application includes a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density, stating 97 (really 96) rooms/units exist and only 94 rooms/units are permitted. Potentially once the acreage for the upland area above the seawall is provided, it will be more evident this portion of the request. However, currently it is unclear the basis for 94 rooms/units being nonconforming. (Note: This is also confusing since Sheet 3/5 indicates in "18.J" that the required number of overnight accommodation rooms/units is 107, which is based on 2.684 acres and 40 rooms/units per acre). Revise/explain. ~CITYOFCLE~RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-11108 - 6/9 S GULFV/EW BLVD ~- ~ CITY OF CLE~RWATER } earwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MYC LEAR W ATER. C OM November 08, 2005 8. Application is totally confusing as to existing versus proposed rooms/units. Application indicates 97 (actually 96) existing overnight accommodation rooms/units and 111 overnight accommodation rooms/units and two dwelling units proposed. This is for the entire site. Based on the proposed architectural plans, there are 91 units in the new building. It is unclear how many rooms/units are in the existing two-story and six-story building on the north side (but it can't be more than a maximum of 20 or 22 units). It is also unclear where these two proposed dwelling units are located. 9. This site is proposed for a mixed use, including residential (two attached dwelling units) and nonresidential (111 overnight accommodation rooms/units). Need to provide a mixed use calculation to determine conformance with maximum density/intensity levels. Revise application to specifically state the request is for a mixed use of "x" dwelling units and "y" overnight accommodation units. 10. Sheet 3/5 indicates there are 176 existing parking spaces and Exhibit B indicates that a 176-space parking garage was constructed in 2001. There are existing parking spaces not within the parking garage not being counted, or the parking garage does not contain 176 spaces. Additionally, the application materials do not indicate that 173 parking spaces are proposed within the new building, with three open parking spaces not within the parking garage (total of 176 spaces). With 356 spaces indicated on Sheet 3/5 as proposed, that leaves 180 within the existing parking garage, which is different than what Exhibit B states. It is unclear the number of existing and proposed parking spaces with this application. Revise both Sheet 3/5 and Exhibit B. Ensure that existing versus proposed spaces are verified through on-site counts. 11. Site plan sheets appear to ignore the existing improvements to remain as if the northern portion of the site doesn't exist. These improvements should not be "ghosted" in, but rather darkened as part of the site. Improvements should be made to the entire site, not just the southern portion, including improvements to the public sidewalk for the site frontage. Need to show how all parts of the site works and functions together. The site will have three driveways, not the two that are darkened in. Provide all setbacks to existing improvements on the north side (building, pavement, decks, etc.), as well as the existing building heights, and include in the request. There is a 12.08-foot dimension shown from the new building on its west side to a dashed line, for which the dashed line is not indicated what it represents. While provisions for solid waste have been shown for the new building, what is the circumstance for the existing portions of the site to remain? Revise. 12. Sheet 3/5 -The site data table neither documents the existing nor the proposed square footage of vehicular use area (outside of parking garages, which exists in both the existing and proposed conditions). If the proposed vehicular use area exceeds 4,000 square feet, at least 10 percent of the vehicular use area must be in interior landscape area. Revise. 13. Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 -Dimensions and written material on the site plan itself are extremely small. Please enlarge. 14. Sheet 3/5 -Dimension the width of all driveways, existing (to remain) or proposed. Getter of Ltcompleteness - FGD2005-1 / / 08 - 619 S GULFV/EW BLVD LL ~ CITY OF CLE~RWATER ~~ ° earwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W WW.MYCLEARWATER.COM November 08, 2005 15. Sheet 3/5 -Visibility triangles shown are great, however, they obscure the information within the triangles. Revise triangles so that information within the triangles are viewable (possibly remove shading from triangles). 16. Sheets 3/5 and 5/5 -Show the visibility triangle for the western, existing driveway. Show waterfront visibility triangles on these sheets and show compliance with requirements. 17. Since the value of the improvements will exceed 25 percent of the value of the existing building(s), landscaping and parking must be brought into full compliance with Code provisions. Show compliance for the entire site. 18. Sheet 3/5 -Provide site data for the entire site, as it appears that site data has only been provided for the project site area. 19. As discussed at apre-submission meeting; the application material leaves much to be desired regarding the existing hotel building. If units are being combined, need floor plans to show how this is being done. If there are improvements being made to the exterior of the existing building, need to provide full size elevation drawings (all four sides) showing the improvements, colors of the exterior materials, etc. 20. The site and landscape plans (Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5) do not show the location of the proposed monument-style sign. The architectural plans (Sheet A1.01) indicate a monumental sign." Code provisions will limit any freestanding sign, even through the Comprehensive Sign Program, to a maximum height of six feet. The architectural plans locate the sign behind proposed landscaping. Suggestion: Since the minimum setback is five feet for the freestanding sign, move the sign to be viewable in front of proposed landscaping. Revise Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 to show the monument sign location. 21. Sheet. 3/5 -Side (east) setback is listed only to the building, but there is a zero setback to pavement indicated. Also, an existing tiki but is shown to remain. This structure will need to be brought into compliance with setbacks (don't know what it's current setbacks are, as they are not shown). This "tiki hut" is actually where the waverunners are rented from. There is gasoline involved with this use. Strongly suggest it be incorporated with the new building and be fire sprinkled. 22. Sheet 3/5 - A 20.93 -foot setback dimension is indicated on the drawing and in #6 as a rear setback to building from the seawall. Since the seawall is actually the Tourist zoning line and there is a Level 2 deck shown at a zero setback, need to indicate such on the plans and in the request. The proposed steps to the Leve12 deck are also a structure and must be included. 23. Transfer of Development Rights - 10 overnight accommodation rooms/units are being proposed to be transferred from 669 Mandalay Avenue, which is currently developed with a 31 (or 38 unit motel) and is nonconforming to density limitations of 11 rooms/units based on 40 rooms/units per acre and 0.282 acres. This site does not currently have any density to give, as it is a nonconforming, operating motel. There have been no building permits submitted to demolish the motel. Letter oJ/ncanpteteness - FLD2005-1 / 108 - 6/9 S GULFVIEW BLED CITY OF CLE~RWATER `~ ° earwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT - MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARW ATER. C OM November 08, 2005 ~\ \ 24. This comment is more of a "heads up" that there are problems with the building design: On ~14~3 Sheet A2.01 it is noted "open air lobby and loggia registration." It is unclear what function this area serves because the registration desk must be on Level 2, since the majority of this building is in a Velocity Flood Zone. Very limited hotel functions may occur on Level 1. This registration area on Level 2, however, is solely accessed by open stairs from Level 1 and Sheet A2.02 shows no access to this registration area from Level 2. Since the registration area on Level 2 is separated from the elevators by the ramp and parking; the registration area does not function. This registration area on Level 2 must be also be handicap accessible, which it is not. Additionally, based on the north elevation on Sheet A3.01, it is unclear what is meant by "open air lobby and loggia registration" since it appears to be enclosed. The "windows" indicated on the front elevation on the floor plans for Levels 1 - 4 are also not coordinated with the north elevation. Finally, it is unclear what the function of the "private management offices" are on Level 4, but these offices are assumed to be part of the hotel and must also be handicap accessible. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 9 am on Thursday, November 10, 2005. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 9 am on Thursday, November 10, 2005. This Letter of Incompleteness was amended to include Comment 24. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or W ayne. Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, G1~ ~ fi~.~"~ mac' WaynWells Planner III Letter o(Incompleteness - FLD2005-1 / l08 - til9 S GULFV/EW BLVD • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 7:57 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-11108 - 619 S. Gulfview Blvd (Shephard's Beach Resort) -Amended Letter of Incompleteness Jayne - I am sending this to you because Gina's email address was not shown in your forwarded email to me. Please forward this amended Letter of Incompleteness to Gina (Comment 24 added). Might Gina's email address be GinaC@jpfirm.com? Thanks. Wayne ,~ amended letter of incompletene... Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [Jaynes@jpfirm.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:57 AM To: Gina L. Canopari Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2005-11108 - 619 S. Gulfview Blvd (Shephard's Beach Resort) letter of completeness 11.7.. Gina, see attached from Wayne. I sent a copy of this to the printer. Wayne, see Gina's email above. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wellsc~myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 8:52 PM To: Jayne E. Sears Subject: FLD2005-11108 - 619 S. Gulfview Blvd (Shephard's Beach Resort) Jayne - Please forward this email to Gina Canopari, as I understand she is handling this case and I don't have her email address. Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced application. Please resubmit by 9 am on Thursday, November 10, 2005, to stay on track to the December 8, 2005 DRC meeting, addressing all comments of the attached letter. Should you be unable to resubmit, the next deadline to submit a complete application is November 30, 2005. Wayne «letter of incompleteness 11.7.05.pdf» IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE To the extent this email contains federal tax advice, such advice was not intended to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. If you would like us to prepare written tax advice designed to provide penalty protection, please contact us and we will be happy to discuss the matter with you in more detail. 1 r ~~ c I ~. :. Clearwater November 07, 2005 E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757 CITY OF CLE~RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W WW.MYCLEARWATER.COM RE: FLD2005-11108 -- 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-11108. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomulete with the following comments. 1. Revise Page 1 of the application to include Parcel #17-29-15-00000-220-0100. 2. Revise Sheet 3/5 to add Parcel ID 17/29/15/00000/220/0100 and to revise the Present Use to a 96 overnight accommodations. 3. Sheet 3/5 -The area south of the seawall is zoned OS/R. Need to indicate such zoning on this sheet, as well as the acreage zoned Tourist and the acreage zoned OS/R. Ensure the site data table indicates in "J. Overnight Accommodations" that the required (maximum number of units) is based on that area zoned Tourist. 4. Sheet 1/5 -Revise Project Location map to the proposed site (map currently indicates north beach, not south beach). 5. Exhibit B refers (many places) to an existing 97 room unit hotel, however, Room 102 was remodeled to a keg storage room in 2004, reducing the number of rooms/units to 96. Revise all locations of Exhibit B. Also revise Sheet 3/5 under "3. Present Use" and "18. J. Overnight accommodations: Existing." 6. The survey does not indicate the flood zones affecting the property. Sheet 3/5 indicates that the property lies within the "VE" Flood Zone. However, checking with Doug King in our Engineering Department, the property lies within the AE-12, VE-13, VE-14 and VE-16 Flood Zones. Revise. 7. The application includes a Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density, stating 97 (really 96) rooms/units exist and only 94 rooms/units are permitted. Potentially once the acreage for the upland area above the seawall is provided, it will be more evident this portion of the request. However, currently it is unclear the basis for 94 rooms/units being nonconforming. (Note: This is also confusing since Sheet 3/5 indicates in "18.J" that the required number of overnight accommodation rooms/units is 107, which is based on 2.684 acres and 40 rooms/units per acre). Revise/explain. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-/ 1108 - 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD LL ~ CITY OF CL~RWATER ° earwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARW ATER. C OM November 07, 2005 8. Application is totally confusing as to existing versus proposed rooms/units. Application indicates 97 (actually 96) existing overnight accommodation rooms/units and 111 overnight accommodation rooms/units and two dwelling units proposed. This is for the entire site. Based on the proposed architectural plans, there are 91 units in the new building. It is unclear how many rooms/units are in the existing two-story and six-story building on the north side (but it can't be more than a maximum of 20 or 22 units). It is also unclear where these two proposed dwelling units are located. 9. This site is proposed for a mixed use, including residential (two attached dwelling units) and nonresidential (111 overnight accommodation rooms/units). Need to provide a mixed use calculation to determine conformance with maximum density/intensity levels. Revise application to specifically state the request is for a mixed use of "x" dwelling units and "y" overnight accommodation units. 10. Sheet 3/5 indicates there are 176 existing parking spaces and Exhibit B indicates that a 176-space parking garage was constructed in 2001. There are existing parking spaces not within the parking garage not being counted, or the parking garage does not contain 176 spaces. Additionally, the application materials do not indicate that 173 parking spaces are proposed within the new building, with three open parking spaces not within the parking garage (total of 176 spaces). With 356 spaces indicated on Sheet 3/5 as proposed, that leaves 180 within the existing parking garage, which is different than what Exhibit B states. It is unclear the number of existing and proposed parking spaces with this application. Revise both Sheet 3/5 and Exhibit B. Ensure that existing versus proposed spaces are verified through on-site counts. 11. Site plan sheets appear to ignore the existing improvements to remain as if the northern portion of the site doesn't exist. These improvements should not be "ghosted" in, but rather darkened as part of the site. Improvements should be made to the entire site, not just the southern portion, including improvements to the public sidewalk for the site frontage. Need to show how all parts of the site works and functions together. The site will have three driveways, not the two that are darkened in. Provide all setbacks to existing improvements on the north side (building, pavement, decks, etc.), as well as the existing building heights, and include in the request. There is a 12.08-foot dimension shown from the new building on its west side to a dashed line, for which the dashed line is not indicated what it represents. While provisions for solid waste have been shown for the new building, what is the circumstance for the existing portions of the site to remain? Revise. 12. Sheet 3/5 -The site data table neither documents the existing nor the proposed square footage of vehicular use area (outside of parking garages, which exists in both the existing and proposed conditions). If the proposed vehicular use area exceeds 4,000 square feet, at least 10 percent of the vehicular use area must be in interior landscape area. Revise. 13. Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 -Dimensions and written material on the site plan itself are extremely small. Please enlarge. 14. Sheet 3/5 -Dimension the width of all driveways, existing (to remain) or proposed. Letter of /ncomp(eteness - FLD2005-11!08 - 6/9 S GULFV/EW BLVD LL ~ CITY OF CL~RWATER ° earwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING `~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W WW.MYCLEARWATER.COM November 07, 2005 15. Sheet 3/5 -Visibility triangles shown are great, however, they obscure the information within the triangles. Revise triangles so that information within the triangles are viewable (possibly remove shading from triangles). 16. Sheets 3/5 and 5/5 -Show the visibility triangle for the western, existing driveway. Show waterfront visibility triangles on these sheets and show compliance with requirements. 17. Since the value of the improvements will exceed 25 percent of the value of the existing building(s), landscaping and parking must be brought into full compliance with Code provisions. Show compliance for the entire site. 18. Sheet 3/5 -Provide site data for the entire site, as it appears that site data has only been provided for the project site area. 19. As discussed at apre-submission meeting, the application material leaves much to be desired regarding the existing hotel building. If units are being combined, need floor plans to show how this is being done. If there are improvements being made to the exterior of the existing building, need to provide full size elevation drawings (all four sides) showing the improvements, colors of the exterior materials, etc. 20. The site and landscape plans (Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5) do not show the location of the proposed monument-style sign. The architectural plans (Sheet A1.01) indicate a "monumental sign." Code provisions will limit any freestanding sign, even through the Comprehensive Sign Program, to a maximum height of six feet. The architectural plans locate the sign behind proposed landscaping. Suggestion: Since the minimum setback is five feet for the freestanding sign, move the sign to be viewable in front of proposed landscaping. Revise Sheets 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 to show the monument sign location. 21. Sheet 3/5 -Side (east) setback is listed only to the building, but there is a zero setback to pavement indicated. Also, an existing tiki but is shown to remain. This structure will need to be brought into compliance with setbacks (don't know what it's current setbacks are, as they are not shown). This "tiki hut" is actually where the waverunners are rented from. There is gasoline involved with this use. Strongly suggest it be incorporated with the new building and be fire sprinkled. 22. Sheet 3/5 - A 20.93 -foot setback dimension is indicated on the drawing and in #6 as a rear setback to building from the seawall. Since the seawall is actually the Tourist zoning line and there is a Level 2 deck shown at a zero setback, need to indicate such on the plans and in the request. The proposed steps to the Leve12 deck are also a structure and must be included. 23. Transfer of Development Rights - 10 overnight accommodation rooms/units are being proposed to be transferred from 669 Mandalay Avenue, which is currently developed with a 31 (or 38 unit motel) and is nonconforming to density limitations of 11 rooms/units based on 40 rooms/units per acre and 0.282 acres. This site does not currently have any density to give, as it is a nonconforming, operating motel. There have been no building permits submitted to demolish the motel. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-!! /08 - 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD LL ~ CITY OF CL~RWATER ~' ° earwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING `~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MY CLEAR W ATER. C OM November 07, 2005 Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 9 am on Thursday, November 10, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or W ayne. Wells@myclearwater. com. Sincerely yours, Wa e Wells Planner III Letter ojlncompleteness - FLD2005-//108 - 6/9 S GULFV/EW BLVD r • Welis, Wayne 4 From: - Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 8:52 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-11108 - 619 S. Gulfview Blvd (Shephard's Beach Resort) Jayne - Please forward this email to Gina Canopari, as I understand she is handling this case and I don't have her email address. Attached is a Letter of IncomE November 10, 2005, to stay c letter. Should you be unable Wayne 3 letter of completeness 11.7., • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 7:46 AM To: Fox, MaryJo Subject: RE: Shephards, 619 S. Gulfview Blvd. They are in with another FLD case to demolish the southern portion of the site and build a new building as part of the complex. I will deal with them through this FLD case. Otherwise, I don't know. It could be that we potentially cite them everyday. Or, take them to Code Board and have a daily fine of the maximum of $250 for each and every day we find them putting out illegal signs. -----Original Message----- From: Fox, MaryJo Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 7:40 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Shephards, 619 S. Gulfview Blvd. Yes I will. There are other sign violations there too. Excessive flags and sandwich board signs. Other than me citing them, what is their consequences to their FLD case if they continue violation the sign code? -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:26 PM To: Fox, MaryJo Cc: Hall, Bob Subject: Shephards, 619 S. Gulfview Blvd. MaryJo - I attended a Beach Walk Hard Hat meeting at Shephard's this morning. After the meeting we went out onto the dock at the rear. There is a banner attached to the water (southwest side) of the dock. Under the approval by the CDB on August 17, 2004, on Case No. FLD2004-05033, the Board included the following condition: "That signage meet City Code." If this is a violation, could you please handle? Thanks. Wayne .;..:! ,~,~~~~~7~}y CITY OF CLEARWATER x `~'~,i, ~ z~-i PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES '- " -~~~ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING - ,~q~E~F{,,` 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 ~~-:.,,~ PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL9145731 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD SUNCOAST GIFTS INC Bus phone: (727) 441-1846 PEOPLE Role: Business Owner FEES THOMAS POWERS PHONE: (727) 327-2334 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD FAX: No Fax CLEARWATER, FL 33767-2643 Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due LICENSE FEE -RENEWAL $1,070.27 $1,070.27 $0.00 Total $1,070.27 $1,070.27 $0.00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity # Employees 070040 MERCHANT OR MERCHANDISING 19,000 3 Done ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp By Issue License -RENEWAL 8/8/1998 DONE DAH Issue License -RENEWAL 8/23/2001 DONE RRP 01-02 Issue License 9/23/1997 DONE Janet McMahan Issue License -RENEWAL 9/2/1999 DONE Kathleen Bedini Issue License -RENEWAL 8/22/2000 DONE BLS Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/26/1997 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH r:\Forms\InfoSummary.rpt O ~ L9 ~ 45731 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License -RENEWAL 8/13/2002 02-03 Renewal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Issue License -RENEWAL 8/12/2003 2003-2004 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Additional Requirements Needed 8/30/2004 $132.10 fee due, Over paid: check #2348 7 for $146.80 returned for reissue Issue License -RENEWAL 8/30/2004 04-05 Renewal Notice 7/22/2005 FY2005-2006 OCL Letter Sent 8/10/2005 8/10/2005-REC'D ECON DEV SURVEY... NO PAY'MT OR RENEWAL NOTICE. JMC Issue License -RENEWAL 8/11/2005 2005-2006 n DONE WBS DONE DONE WBS DONE WBS DONE Janet McMahan DONE r:\Forms\InfoSummary.rpt t ~ ... ., - Q,, %~~ ~.fy.~f9 ~~~4'TEP~~`'" CASE SUMMARY OCL9005301 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD • CITY O~ CLEAR~IlIATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT INC Hotel/retail /vending 12/2/2004-UNITS REDUCED FROM 97 TO 96...CONVERTING ONE ROOM TO COOLER/KEG ROOM. JMC PEOPLE Role: Business Owner FEES LICENSE FEE -RENEWAL Total OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT INC LAGOON RESORT INC 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33767-2643 Assessed Amount Amount Paid $2,176.95 $2,176.95 $2,176.95 $2,176.95 Category Quantity 070010 MERCHANT OR MERCHANDISING 1,000 091000 RENTAL UNITS 96 110020 VENDING MACHINES: OPERATOR 6 ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Issue License -RENEWAL 9/15/1998 PHONE: (727) 442-5107 FAX: No Fax Balance Due $0.00 $0.00 # Employees 0 0 0 Done Disp By DONE BLS Additional Requirements Needed 10/10/2002 DONE WBS 00/01 active building permit -adding units had 58 will be 94 units -hold til building Certificate of Occupancy issued - Paid for units (94) and merchant categories. No active permits Issue License 9/17/1997 DONE MBW Issue License -RENEWAL 10/11/2001 DONE RRP 01-02 Issue License -RENEWAL 10/15/1999 DONE Kathleen Bedini OCL Letter Sent 9/27/2001 DONE WBS $38.50 balance due by 10/12/01 to avoid late fee Issue License -RENEWAL 3/29/2001 DONE WBS 00/01 - 58 units issued, 36 additional units paid for a total of 94 not to be occupied until c/o issued. ds Renewal Notice 8/14/1997 8/14/1997 DONE BLB r:\Forms\I nfoSu mmary.rpt QCLOQ~53O1 • • 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Additional Requirements Needed 10/8/2002 DONE WBS $109.25 balance due and co py of State /Dept of Hotels and Rest certifcate showing 97 Units by 10/4/02 to avoid late fees, ds Issue License -RENEWAL 10/10/2002 DONE WBS 02-03 Renewal Notice 7/11 /2003 03/04 Issue License -RENEWAL 8/22/2003 2003-2004 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Issue License -RENEWAL 8/23/2004 2004-2005 Renewal Notice 7/22/2005 FY2005-2006 Issue License -RENEWAL 8/23/2005 2005-2006 DONE DONE DONE r:\Forms\I nfoSummary.rpt ~. _ ` l ,~~~ a, ~ TE'~ ~ti' '%~..., rti'' CASE SUMMARY OCL-0003845 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD CITY ®~ CL~AR~IVATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 WAVERUNNERS AT GULFVIEW INC jet ski /chair, umbrella rental behind Sheppards and next door Econo Lodge PEOPLE Role: Owner/Property WILLIAM M SHEPHARD THE ' C/O EASLEY MCCALEB & ASSOC PO BOX 2587 ORLANDO, FL 32802 Business Owner GULFSIDE ADVENTURES INC GULFSIDE ANDVENTURES INC 3840 SUNRISE LANE TARPON SPRINGS, FL 34688 Business Owner WAVERUNNERS AT GULFVIEW INC ATTN: JERRY ALBERTSEN 11417 65TH AVE N SEMINOLE, FL 33772 FEES Assessed Amount Amount Paid DUPLICATE LICENSE $15.75 $15.75 HALF YEAR LICENSE $76.13 $76.13 LICENSE FEE -RENEWAL $1,302.00 $1,302.00 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10 $57.86 $57.86 PARTIAL YEAR LICENSE $97.88 $97.88 Total $1,549.62 $1,549.62 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Category Quantity 023030 BOAT AND TRAILERS: RENTAL 0 024010 BOATS, PASSENGER 6 024010 BOATS, PASSENGER 6 049000 EQUIPMENT RENTAL, SMALL TOOL 0 ACTIVITIES Issue License -NEW Issue License -RENEWAL Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 7/7/1999 10/11 /2001 PHONE: No Phone FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727-639-3852 FAX: No Fax PHONE: 455-2528 FAX: No Fax Balance Due $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 # Employees 0 0 0 0 Done Disp By DONE GBD DONE SLW r:\Forms\InfoSummary.rpt OCL-00384 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD Issue License -RENEWAL 1/21/2000 DONE FR Issue License -NEW 5/11/1999 DONE R_S Issue License -RENEWAL 9/27/2000 DONE Janet McMahan Renewal Notice 8/2/1999 7199 BATCH Parcel Hold Override 9/27/2000 Janet McMahan Condition Code: DEVO Value : Description:Dev Order Hold Parcel Hold Override 1 /21 /2000 FR Condition Code: DEVO Value : Description:Dev Order Hold Parcel Hold Override 10/11/2001 SLW Condition Code: DEVO Value : Description:Dev Order Hold Delinquent Renewal Notice 1/5/2000 01 /00-DLO Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Issue License -NEW 5/20/2002 DONE RRP Override -Parcel Holds 5/20/2002 SLW Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License -NEW 10/9/2002 DONE SLW 02-03 done by mal Override -Parcel Holds 10/9/2002 SLW Renewal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Issue License -RENEWAL 8/19/2003 DONE Calvin Peterson 03/04 Issue License -RENEWAL 3/12/2004 DONE Jean Peeke 03/04 -REQUESTED TO PR INT PER ARDEN DITTMER (JMP) Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 -returned, forward time expired, changed mailing address from 51 Island Way #1207 to 880 Mandalay Ave #C410 and remailed Issue License -RENEWAL 10/1/2004 DONE Calvin Peterson 04/05 Issue License -RENEWAL 1/11/2005 DONE R_D Zoning Review 6/10/2005 6/10/2005 DONE JVS Harbor Master 6/10/2005 DONE Calvin Peterson SIGNED OFF BY BILL MORRISON Override -Parcel Holds 6/10/2005 R_D Override -Parcel Holds 6/10/2005 R_D License Transferred 6/10/2005 DONE R_D Override -Parcel Holds 6/10/2005 R_D Override -Parcel Holds 6/10/2005 R_D r:\Forms\I nfoSummary.rpt OCL-0~00384~, 619 S GULFVIEW BLVD Renewal Notice FY2005-2006 Issue License -RENEWAL 05-06 7/22/2005 9/30/2005 DONE R_D r:\Forms\InfoSummary.rpt `~ nivision of Corporations • ~ Page 1 of 2 ~- 'Fl~~~~t~ ~?~~:a~~,~;ty~~~r~7~tf,~~~{S,Pr~~:u L~;~~c~~c?tr t~~i~'r~r~?~r~~~~i~~rz.~ ~ ~ ,~, . A . s . . ~ ~ ~ '< ~ r ~u~~c I~ ~qu~r~~ Florida Profit SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT, INC. PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 619 SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD CLEARWATER BEACH FL 34630-2643 MAILING ADDRESS 619 SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD CLEARWATER BEACH FL 34630-2643 Document Number FEI Number 648998 591950743 State Status FL ACTIVE Last Event Event Date Filed NAME CHANGE 09/18/2000 AMENDMENT Registered A Name & Address PARRI RAYMOND L PA 1217 PONCE DE LEON BLVD CLEARWATER FL 34616 Name Changed: 03/03/1993 Address Changed: 03/03/1993 Officer/Director Detail Date Filed 12/20/ 1979 Effective Date NONE Event Effective Date NONE Name & Address Title SHEPHARD, WILLIAM 44 N. PINE CIRCLE PD BELLEAIR FL SHEPHARD, WILLIAM 44 N. PINE CIRCLE ST BELLEAIR FL http://www. sunbiz. org/scripts/cordet. exe?a1=DETFIL&n 1=648998&n2=NAMFWD&n3=... 11 /7/2005 Division of Corporations Annual Reports • Page 2 of 2 Report Year Filed Date 2003 03/20/2003 2004 03/05/2004 2005 04/22/2005 Previous Filing Return to List View Events View_Name Histo~ Next Filing Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 04/22/2005 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 03/05/2004 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 03/20/2003 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 02/28/2002 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 03/06/2001 -- ANN REP/IJNIFORM BUS REP 09/18/2000 -- Name Change 03/03/2000 -- ANN REP/iJNIFORM BUS REP 02/25/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT 01/28/1998 -- ANNUAL REPORT 01/29/1997 -- ANNUAL REPORT 01/26/1996 -- 1996 ANNUAL REPORT THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Carp~ara~.vn~ Inqu~~ry ! ~ Carpora~c~~s ~~l.p , http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n 1=648998&n2=NAMFWD&n3=... 11 /7/2005 ,~, Pinellas County Property App~er Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 0~ Page 2 of 7 ~7 / z~ I ~.~ I 05004 I oo~ I oo~o 07-NoV-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:21:54 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales SHEPHARD, WILLIAM M THE OBK: 06758 OPG: 1631 C/0 EASLEY MCCALEB & ASSOC 619 S GULFUIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767-2643 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 619 S G ULFVIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 2b0.02 sales from 2003 - 2004: p Sale Date OR Book/Page Price {QualiUnQ} VaclImp Plat Information 0 11,977 4,567/1,565 1,250,000 {Q} I 1955: Book 038 Pgs 038-039 0 11,973 3,996/ 856 1,048,000 {U} I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 { } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS JustJMarket: 7,950,000 Homestead: NO Ownership ~ .000 Govt Exem: NO Use ~: .000 AssessedjCap; 7,950,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt ~; .000 Historic Exem; 0 Taxable; 7,950,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Gulf Of Mexico Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 184,735.74 1} 335 x 280 70. 00 81, 896. 00 S Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 LJithout the Save-Our-Homes q} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 184, 735. 74 6} 0 x D . 00 . 00 LJithout any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 184, 735. 74 Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB N0. 5 BLK C, LO TS i THRU 5 & RIP Description RTS Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 11 /7/2005 Pinellas County Property App~er Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 0~ Page 3 of 7 Pro~ertX and Land Use Code descriptions . Bui_ldin.g_ 1_ . Bu.l..dng_ 2. . Builciilg 3 Building #1 17 / 29 / 15 I 05004 I 003 / 0010 :01 07-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:21:54 Commercial Card O1 of 3 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel < 4 St Property Address; 619 S GULFVIEW BLVO Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 S-truc~ural E1cm~nts Foundation SpreadfMono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior lJall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party LJall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Gable & Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Coolin9 Pckg Fixtures 293 Bath Tile Half Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year .Built 1,957 Effective Age 10 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1} Base Area i. 00 47, 991 7} . 00 0 2} Open Porch . 30 5, 296 8} . 00 0 3} Utility .40 576 9) .00 0 4} Canopy .25 462 10} .00 0 5} .00 0 11) .00 0 6} .00 0 12) .00 0 C omm e r c i a l E x t r a F~ a~ ur e s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) DOCK 641 20.00 641 12,820 11,410 1,985 2} POOL 600SF 25,000.00 1 25,000 18,500 1,985 ~} COHC PAVE 3579SF 3.00 3, 579 10, 740 10, 740 i, 985 4} ASPHALT 17000 1.50 17,000 25,500 25,500 1,985 5} PATIO/DECK 1791 8.50 1,191 15,220 11,260 1,985 6} GAZEBO 1000 25.00 1,000 25,000 18,500 1,991 ~ TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 95,910 Building #2 http://pao.co.Pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 11 /7/2005 Pinellas County Property App~er Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 0~ Page 4 of 7 1T f 29 / 15 I 05004 I 00~ I 0010 :02 07-Hov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:21:56 Commercial Card 02 of 3 Improvement Type; Motel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 0 Prop Use; 312 Land Use; 39 Structural Elements Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Bar JoistlRigid Fram Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 113 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 2,000 Effective Age 6 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Ar$as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1} Base Area i. 00 24, 672 7} . 00 0 2} .00 0 8} .00 0 3} .00 0 9} .00 0 4) .00 0 10} .00 0 5} .00 0 11} .00 0 6} .00 0 12} .00 0 C ommcr c i a1 E xt r a F e at ur s s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} FIRESPRIHK 24672 1.75 24,672 43,180 40,160 2,000 2} . 00 0 0 D 0 3} . 00 0 0 0 0 4) . 00 0 0 0 0 5} .00 0 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTRL RECORD VALUE: 40,160 Building #3 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 11/7/2005 Pi~,ellas County Property App~er Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 0~ Page 5 of 7 1? / 29 ~ 15 ~ 05004 I 003 / 0010 :03 07-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:21:57 Commercial Card 03 of 3 Improvement Type: Parking Garage Property Address; 0 Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 Structural E1sm~n~s Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Corrugated Asbestos Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish None Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 0 Bath Tile Hone Electric Average Shape Factor Square Quality Average Year Built 2,001 Effective Age 5 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Description Factor Rrea 1) Base Area i. 00 91, 518 7) . 00 0 2) Office Area 1.75 540 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5} .00 0 11} .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C cmme r c i a1 E x t r a F e at ur c s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} FIRESPRIHK ALL 1.75 92,058 161,100 153,050 2,001 2} ELEU PASS 2000LB 30,000.00 1 30,000 26,700 2,001 3) ELEV STOP 3 STOPS 7,000.00 3 21,000 18,690 2,001 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) . 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 198,440 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ®® http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 11 /7/2005 Pinellas County Property App~er Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 0~ Page 6 of 7 ~c i _~1D L~l i`~~ ~.[ "`t 1 ~ ~ `' ~ `~ 5 3„~ 9 ~~ yu, . ~~~ ~1 +1r 1 r f+. f`. --=~ '~21 ~ ~~ 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) ~ - r--- + 1 ___ ~ ~ ~r G U L~ V I E's4~ BL'':~'D L~: f3 L ~~~ ~~~ [~ C 4J •i t;l~L ~''~,` IEVs+ GL1rEl ~~ http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 11/7/2005 Pinellas County Property App~er Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 0~ Page 7 of 7 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen. http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 11 /7/2005 ;. F~nellas County Property App~er Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 0~ Page 2 of 5 w 17 / 29 / 15 / 00000 / 220 / 0100 07-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:22:55 Ownership Information Vacant Property Use and Sales LAGOON RESORT MOTEL OBK: 04567 OPG; 1565 619 S GULFUIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767-2643 EVAC: A EVAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2003 - 2004; p Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ} Vac/Imp Plat Inforr-~ation 0 /1,977 4,567/1,565 1,250,000 {U} V 0000; Book Pgs - 0 11,970 3,3661 880 27,000 {Q} V 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /O 0/ 0 0 { } 0000; Book Pgs - 0 /O 0/ 0 0 { } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS JustlMarket; 1,176,400 Homestead; NO Ownership ~ .000 Govt Exem: NO Use ~: .000 Assessed/Cap; 1,176,400 Institutional Exem; NO Tax Exempt ~; .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1,176,400 Agricultural; 0 2004 Tax Information District; CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View; 05 Millage; 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 27,336.24 1} 60 x 350 70. 00 19, 772.12 S Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 LJithout the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 27, 336. 24 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 LJithout any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be ; 27, 336. 24 Short Legal BEG AT NW COR OF LOT i BLK C OF BAYS IDE #5 SUB RUN N Description 54 DEG W 65.14FT S 12 DEG W 351.52FT TO S'LY LN OF Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11 /7/2005 P;nellas County Property App~er Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 0~ ~7 ~ z~ ~ 1~ r aaaaa ~ zza ~ a~.aa Page 3 of 5 07-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 10:22:54 Vacant Parcel Property Use; 000 Land Use: 10 Vacant Fxtra F~a~ur~s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} .00 0 0 0 0 ~} . 00 0 D 0 0 3} .00 0 0 0 0 q} .00 0 0 0 0 5} .00 0 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) oao®o http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11 /7/2005 Pnellas County Property App~er Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 00~ i ~- Uc. . ~ ~ ~. r~~ f ~~~ j ~'~ r~ ~ 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) Page 4 of 5 http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11 /7/2005 P;,nellas County Property App~er Information: 17 29 15 OSQ04 003 0~ Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11 /7/2005