Loading...
FLD2006-03016 (2)FLD2006-03016 520 DREW ST DREW STREET SHOPS PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS ATLAS # 277B ZONING: D LAND USE: CBD RECEIVED: 03/29/2006 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet Clearwater ~ sit ~Fl d ~~~ - ~' '" Telephone: 727582-4567 u Fax:T27-582-4865 O SUBMrTORIGINALSIGNEDANDNCJTAR~DAPPLICATION C SUBi1fil i 14 COPIES ~ THE CaRlG[NA1 APPLICA including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of sit plans O SUBMITAPPLICATION FEE CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTFI: SOUTH: WEST: " NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised o2-02006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4202.A) APPLICANT NAME: "'JAMESCHRIST CORP MAILING ADDRESS: 431 S. Gulfview Blvd. , Clearwater, F1 33755 ORIGINAL PHONE NUMBER: (7 2 7) 4 61 - 3 3 2 9 FAX NUMBER: ~ I A`' ~ RECEIVEa PROPERTY OWNER(S) (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 8): ` '~' ` ~ ~ 2U06 See Attached ~~~ r,~ W - CITY OF CLER,RWATER gC,ENT NAME: Fowler Associates Architects, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 1421 Court St. Suite D, Clearwater, F1 33756 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 449-2021 FAX NUMBER: (727) 447-5339 CELL NUMBER: N ~ A E-MAIL ADDRESS: fowlerarch@aol.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section STREET ADDRESS of subject site: To be determined LEGAL DESCRIPTION (If not listed here, please note the location of this document In the submittal): LO t 3 and the we S t 4 ~ ' of"Lot°4,Block 5, Jones Subdivision of Nicholson's Addition to _Clearwater Harbor; Platbook 1, Page 13, According to the Public Records of Hillsborough Co, Fl of which Pinellas Co. was formerly PARCEL a part . NUMBER: PARCELSQE (Acreage and Square Footage): 31 , 2 5 5 S . f . _ ~ . 71 7 5 `AC Page 1 of 7 - I-lexible Devebpment Comprehensive Infill Application 2006 -City of Clearvrater PROPOSED USE(S), S~5) AND VALUE OF PROJECT (Number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use): 514 s.f Existing drive thru restaurant; 3,133 s.f. new retail Non-residential uses; 9 apartment units DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To allow for a mixed use prod ect of restaurant/retail/ Attach sheets and be specific when Identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) residential in the "Downtown-Old Bay" neighborhood=where this O I NRL - catagory is not listed~~as a permitted use. RECEIVED - MAR 2 9 2006 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMEM' RIGHTS (I'DR), A PREVIOUSLY ~~r~~'~,NY~~INIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SfTE PLAN? YES _ NO X (rf yes, o~tlie applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5) O SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TfiLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OIM4ERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMEN73: (Code Section 3~813.A) O Provide complete responses to the six (t3) GENERAL APPUCABILJTY CRITERIA- Exp~in ~ each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in whichltislocated. The proposed development is in keeping with the stated - prefered uses as identified in the land development code and - therefor is in keeping with the desired urban fabric of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impairtnevaluetnereot. This development will encourage similar redevelopment - activities, and this project will increase the value of adjacent properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. This project will improve the safety of the site by removi - potential hornless areas, and it will provide some affordable living units within the downtown area. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimise traffic congestion. Because W e are using the e x i s t i ric - driveway at the restaurant and the existing alley for vehicle use the congestion is minimized. Page 2 of 7 - Flexble Devebpment Comprehensive Infill Application 2006 -City of Gearwater ORIGINAL RECEIVED - MAC 2 9 2006 _ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIN OF CLEARWATER 5. The proposed development is corsiistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed architectural character of the project is not only - consistent with the vacinity, it will set a trend for all like projects in the transitional neighborhoods. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacentpropertles. The design of the project will not adversly impact _ visual,•acoustical, or olfactory effects and will preserve a major live oak tree on the site. The hours of operation will be consistant - with the surrounding businesses and will not impact the adjacent properties. O Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSNE INFlLL REDEVEI.APMENT PROJECT CRfTERIA (as appl'~cable) - Explain ~r each criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical wfthout deviations from the use, intensltyanddevelopmentstandards. The existing development standards do not list.~a - mixed use project as a permitted use, while the narrative of the code encourages retail/residential (mixed use) developments. therefore it is necessary to request a deviation from the development _ standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. pnciude the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) This mixed use ( infill ) project is anticipated to increase i-hP valu cif th sLrr~unding =rnnPrties and will inrrPacP hP tax - revenues of the city. The anticipated value of the project will be in the range of 2 to 2.5 million dollars, where the area of the _ project is presently vacant. 3. The uses wfthin the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearvv~er. The uses of retail, restaurant, and residential are all permitted _ within 'the city. The existing drive-thru restaurant would not be ~~ permitted the drive thru operation, but is "grandfathterd" because - it was established prior to the new development code. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The adjacent land uses of office to the ease, restaurant to the _ west, offices to the south and commercial to the north, are very compatible eith this development. Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Devebpment Comprehensive Infill Application 2006 - City of Cleannrater ORIGINAL RECEIVED I IH ~ tj n~ nr.~`~~ ncra[~~T~A~n1T - CITY OF CLEARV/ATER S. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill Yedevetopmerrt project will upgrade the Immediate viclnttyoftheparceiproposedfordevelopment. BecallSe the Slte 1S artially vacant and a - place where the homeless tend to congregate, this development will greatly upgrade and enhance the adjacent properties. 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive Infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the Immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The design of this project will create a form and function that is - promoted in the new development code and will be a new high water mark for other similar projects. 7. Flexibility In regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are juatlfied by the benefrta to community character and the immediate vicinky of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. No flexibility from parking, building height, density, or floor - area ratios is being requested. Only the permitting of a mixed-use development is being sought because the land development code does - not list "mixed use" as a permitted use. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the Immediate vicirdty according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid orsstreet parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. Adequate parking for this development will be located on the site - and therefore no shared parking is necessary. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Dov<mtown DlsMct design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. The design of this project is in keeping with the - new design guidelines for the down town and old bay districts. The scale of the structure is pedestrian friendly, the storefronts - encourage pedestrian activities, and the detailing are in keeeping with the scale and "fabric" of the code. Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Deveopment Comprehensive Infill AppBcation 2006 -City of Clearwater ORIGINAL • RECEIVED MAC 2 9 2Q06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATNE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITFI ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that tnvoNe addition or modification of Impervious surface, including buildings, must indude a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surtace area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. if a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the efts is exempt. See page ~ 7 f Or O Ataminimum,theSTORMWATERPLANshallindudethefolbwing: StOrmWater narrative. _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; e Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; _ All ad~cent streets and municipal storm systems; _ Proposed stormwater detentioNretention area incuding top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stomrvvater control pNan Including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance wfth the Cfty manual. e Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. Q COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWPiNMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of Cky Building Permft), if applicable O Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stomtwater plan as rroted above is included X Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations ~ shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENt FOR A' STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A) SIGNEDAND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; lit TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent eke, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around fhe exlshng frees; ~ LACATtON MAPOFTHE PROPERTY; pj ~A PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction wfth a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submikal of the application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance wkh accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parting standards are approved; O GRADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permfts will not be issued until eviderxe of recording a final plat ~ provided); N JnA C~'Y OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) ~ ;. SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24° x 86"): All dimensions; Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Development Comprehensive infill Application 2006 -City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL RECEIVED X North arrow, D !~ X Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; MAfI 2 ~ 2U~fi ~ Location map; ~ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; --~ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,~ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; Cfly OF CLEp,RitJATER _ Alt required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; R!! required sight Mangles; X Identiflcatlon of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, vretlands, tree messes, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; ~ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the efts; .__X Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrents, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; ~ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; ~ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; -~ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or fresh handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3201(Dx~ and Index #701); ~ Location of aA landscape material; X Location of all onsite and offsite stomrwater management facilities; ~ Location of all outdoor lighting fatures; and ~ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. O SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenrtabular tbrrn: X Land area in square feet and acres; .~ Number of EXISTING dwelUng units; ~ Number of PROPOSED duvellir-g units; ~, Gross floor area devoted to each use; ~ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; X:: Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; ~, 3ize and spedes of all landscape material; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; -x, Building and structure heights; ~ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and _x, Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. O REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/: X 11) and color rendering ff possible; N ~A FOR DEVELOPMENTS OV62 ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contoure or spot elevations on site; _ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stommwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building I'rnes (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned}; _ Structural overhangs; _ Tree Irnentory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condftion of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 41102.A) ~ LANDSCAPE PLAN: -g Ail existing and proposed structures; 'I ~ Names of abutting streets; -~- Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ~ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ~ Sight visibility triangles; ?{ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; ,~ Proposed and required parkng spaces; .X Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripiines (as indicated on required tree survey); Page 6 of ~ - Flexible Deveopment Comprehensive Infill Appfication 2006 -City of Clearwater ~ Plant schedule with a key (sym label) indicating the size, description, specifications quantities of all existing and proposed X landscape materials, including ~ical and common names; Location, size, and quantiries of all existing and proposed handscape materials, indicated by a key refiring to the plant schedule; x Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover piarrts including instrucrions, soil motes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; X Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and w percentage covered; X Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. condirions imposed by the Community Development Board); x Irrigarion notes, ~ RE.D~gED 1 ANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/ X 11) (cebr rendering If possible); C~ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); O COMPREHENSNE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM applicarion, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code v~nll not be met. STORMWATFR NARRATIVE It is the intent to capture the first 1/2" of parking lot run off in a swale to the easterly portion of the site, for water quality. Roof water is to be collected and piped directly to the existing city collection system. The balance of the required stormwater volumn will be calculated for "fee in lieu of" in order to save the large trees on site. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAC 2 9 Z0~6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARVVATER Page 7 of y -Flexible Devebpment Comprehensive Infill Application 2006 -City of Gearwater I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: {Section 4202.A.23) Required In the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive infill Redevebpment ProJer.# or a Residerrtial Irrfill Project. t~ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all aides of atl buildings indud'rng height dimensions, colors and mater~is; and C~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four aides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/ X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if J. SIGNAGE: {Division 19.31GN3 /Section 3-1606) All existing monument and directional _~signs are to remain. ~ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs. Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain; see photographs, attached . O All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide devils Including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals); ORIGINAL ^ Comprehensve Sign Progrem application, as applicable (separete apprcatlon and fee required); and RECEIVED ^ Reduced sigratge proposal (8'h X 11) (color), i(submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ~Q~ ~ ~ an~~ K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: {Section 4202.A.13 and 4-801.C) PLANNING QEPARTME O Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or If the proposed development: CITY OF CLEP,RVJATE • VVfll degrede the acceptable level of serv[ce for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • VVfll generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • W(II affect a nearby roadway segment and/or Intersection with five (5) reporNable axiderrts within the prior twelve (12) month period or that le on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edftion of the Institute of Trensportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic impact Study must be prepared in axordance with a "Scoping Meeting° held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4801.C. of the Community Devebpment Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requdroments (Applicant must initial one of the following): Treffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ~~~ X Trefflc Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FORA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acimowledge that all n:presentafions made in this applicatidn are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize representativ to visit and photograph the property descrtb pp icatio . t Signatur of property owner representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ day of ~IE t ~ A.D. 20 and/or by STf.4E~ 1FOid_ii..f~2 o 's personally known has produced as identification. public, Canrnr/ DOOSt~ Explns 4~pr=00! BorrOrrd UMU (~00)MiZ~2 Page 8 of 7 - Flexble Devebpment Comprehensive Infill Application 2008 -City of Geannrater AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AC3ENT: ' 1 James L. Sofronas (Names of ail property owners on deed -please PRINT full names) 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Lot 3 and the west 40' of Lot 4, Block 5, Jones Subdivision of Nicholson's Addition to Clearwater Harbor; Plat Book 1, Pg. 13, According to the Public Records of Hillsborough Co., Fl; of which Pinellas County was formerly a part., 3. That this property constitutes the property br which a request fora: (descnbe request) Permission to develop a mixed use project of restaurant (existing), retail and apartments (new). 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Fowler Associates Architects, Inc. 1421 Court Street, Suite n; Clearwater, F1 33756 as (hisfthelr) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the bregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property owner ORIGINAL. R~~~. ,..,., Property Owner ` Property Owner ~I 1\ PLANNING [?EPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARVVATER STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Bebre me the undersigned, an officer duty commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on ~'t Q-f ' ~ day of this ~--. / personally appeared ~ C~-/f~-e.S +~~ ~~~~ ~s who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the conterrts of the affidavit that he/she signed. rS ~ ~ f / ~ ~ ~~~ ~` ~,` IN"t~ ~4<Yi WeSStt?; ! 7,,~~ ~; 27G ~P~Z,?u: Ckr~~2~, 2f~a3 r Fl. ho:uy ~i£Qk3G.`fusaG Ce C~'~`~V Page 10 of 7 -Flexible Devebpment Comprehensive Infill Application 2006 -City of Geanroater 'TELE (72? j733-SU30 ~yg~. 9 _ `'. ~`` ~~jj((~~1qq ,,~~ ~(~`L(A~1~' ]O~F/~F~ICESUO,Fl' T D rl`l11.J1'Ltiti7 \J• 1111~/,1~r~iJ~~ 1 c~• ATTOtch'EY AND COWSELOR AT La~V 1370 PIlVbHURSI' ROAD DU~`EDIN, FLORIDA 34648 trio Facsimile ta: ~?27) 447-5339 (1' Page) April 10, 2006 Fowler Associates Architects Inc. A"]TN: Stetre Fowler 1421 Court St. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: JAM>:%SCI-IRIS CORP., a Florida Corporation. Dear 1vlr. Fowler; FAX (727j734-053 In response to your telephone request this morning, please, accept this comrz7unication as uTritten confirmation that James Sofr,atlas is the President and sole Director of JA1~~ESCHRIS CORP., a Florida Corporation, and thereby has full power and authority to act in the corporation's behalf. lfyot1 shoLlld need any further assistance, please do rtRt `,esit:ate to contact this office. Sincerely yours, ( ~~ /r-° Thomas O. Michaels, Esq. kegistered Agent for "Jameschris Corp." `I'O M 'tad ORIGINAL RECEIVED QPR 10 2006 ptANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER -~ • ~. o' Best Co~Y pvailabh, PREPARED BY AND RETURN T0: THOMAS C. NASH, II, Esquire Macfarlane, Ferguson & McMullen a married person, and ROBERT P. HORST, a married person, of the 625 Court Street, Suite 200 ~ ~ ~~ Post Office Box 1669 ~~~, r~ / Ili)til_~ S Clearwater, FL 33757 ' i;+'a.a~. Hi~l~,.•~I:a~ii:Ii~I?; ::•.~ - 3-2000 ;29pM ;~iiti~~'ik.= '~'' 00-30 K PG 782 .. ''-. ; 7 t5J P INELLRS CO ~:•. t ~ .. .::.... .....:. ~.... _._ IIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII ,}•r ... .___ i~;:r'i.; a `r i,~_.I: ~~:~; ,.;4.:~ .__ .,__ a :. t: ~,: .;a :::; _ _ ,__. IIIIIII1111111111 -~~-~ ~ - WARRANTY DEED 00-310903 OCT-1 1-2000 5 : 27pM ~~~ ~ -- ' P INELLRS CO BIC 1 1084 PO 2033 .- .___.___._ IIIIIII1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~- THIS INDENTURE made this ~~ day of ~f~~,~ 2000, between ,~,~'; ~~ ~ ALAN C. BOMSTEIN, a married person, ROBERT J. BURNSIDE, a married ._ person, WILLIAM C. GREGG, III, a married person, THOMAS E. McCUNE, r. G O .,~ a .~ U A ro 04 v a .. .r., .~ .~ x w v b b m 0 u b v b 0 u >~ t oa G .~, v .~, a v m C .~, m .~ H County of Pinellas, and the State of Florida, Party of the First Part, whose mailing address is:620 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33755 and JAMESCHRIS CORP., a Florida corporation, whose mailing address is : 431 Gulfview Blvd. , Clearwater, FL 33767 Second Part, W I T N E S S E T H: '! Vii:.?._jil~anJ.tl1;, ;%il.~CL'i.;'il% l;ilii ~ ~llii_i:~ ill., Ii.r i ':.+._~_~ ;1 i F Fi:ij If 1 . PartyRE~C~VED e MAC 2 9 206 PLANNING LEPARTMFNT CITY OF CLEP,RWATf_R That the said Party of the First Part, for and, in consid- elation of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to them in hand paid by the said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold, aliened, remised, conveyed and confirmed and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the said Party of the Second Part and its successors and assigns forever, all that certain parcel of land lying and being in the County of Pinellas, and State of Florida, more particularly described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by f'>rCi~-:~ __ reference . r~•'. 'l ,;`~~. -- '~~ l.~•G Subject to 2000 real estate taxes, restrictions, reser- l.i~ -~ ~~..Z vations and easements of record. ~-~~ THIS IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY OF ANY OF THE GRANTOR I' ;;' ---- - NAMED HEREIN. ,,,,, ---'-.- ~~ . • _. . Parcel I.D. No. 09/29/15/44352/005/0010 _ -~° 09/29/15/44352/005/0030 1/~)~/{~~~~Jam,(\•~(~~~!/'''`)~ji....l~~~ • ~'~~~~:.!._~ ~a~.., „ ~ !:. !-.~ii~.i:.iC; l;i_t.ii:\ I!i ;il~iF i 'ilia..+_n~ l~lil!f!i Y5 i ..Li~al!i1 PINELLRS COUNTY FLR, OFF ,REC . BK 1 1064 PG 2034 P OUNTY FLR, OFF,REC.BK 1 ~~ 7Q3 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appur- tenances, with every privilege, right, title, interest and estate, dower and right of dower, reversion, remainder and easement thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple fo.r.ever. And the said Party of the First Part does covenant with the said Party of the Second Part that they are lawfully seized of the said premises, that it is free of all encumbrance, and that they have good right and lawful authority to sell the same; and that said Party of the First Part does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Part has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. I e Presenc of: 1 ~c- C.:- ( SEAL ) Print e c,g~ ~2~~K/ A C. BOMSTEIN NAB ~:~~ RECEIVED Print ame ~ -;~.~~~ _ ~ ~~ MAC 2~ 206 ~i--~s.--~ f ~ . ~~..tn.N~'1 rint Name A~izc~A,~ Print N ~ .~ Print Na Print Name c t1 PLANNING DEp~R1'~ENT CITY O~ C(~S AL )`ER BERT /D`: BURNSIDE r~ ,/ ~ ?- ( SEAL ) ;~,~~V WILLI ~ GG, III r~ ~ (SEAL) THOMAS E. CUNE ~~ -2- . • PINELLAS COUNTY FLR, OFF,REC,BK 11064 PG 2035 PINELLAS C0074 PG 784 OFF , REC , ~~//~''-`-`~~~~ t--~- ..,~ . -~o~ (SEAL) Print Name ~ ~~ ``~ 'ROBE T P. HORST ~,~~ ~ ~-~,y~-yl ORIGINAL rint Name ~l+-R(~~ K • R~~.,ve.~ RECEIVED MAC 2 ~ 2006 STATE OF FLORIDA PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF PINELLAS CIT`( OF CLEARWATER I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before me, an ~~.z-i.c`r auly au~~~~~l~~u ~v d111111111.7 LC1 lJ Ci l.ia~ c...~.. ~. caiLC= ac r~owledgments, ALAN C. BOMSTEIN, a married person, to me ~sonall kr~.wn~or who has produced as i e a ion, and known to me to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as his free act and deed, and acknowledged before me that he executed the same for the purposes therein expressed on behalf of the partnership. WITNESS my hand anal official seal t Clearwater, said y and State, this ` -day of t~:k~-~~ , 20 .p~ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS Notars~ Pubflic ~` Print Name _ My Commission Expires: OFFlCIAL.NOTARY SEAL. O~p,~2V PUe~~ TIgMASC-1ARLfiSNA•SM-1 2 ~ . !~ * ~OIAMISSION NUMBER r Q CC817038 9j ~Q MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FOF F~•O MAR. 14,2003 I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before me, a __-©ff3:-cez duly authorized to administer oaths and take ac owledgments,~`i~,OBERT J. BURNSIDE, a married person, to me rsonally know or who has produced as d-~-~-i-~i-oa-t ' n, and known to me to be the individual described in a ~- h~-~ ed the foregoing instrument as his free act and deed, and acknowledged before me that he executed the same for the purposes therein expressed on behalf of the partnership. WITNE~~S my ~"ia:~rJ' ar,~3 offi~_ial seal a~earwater, said nt and State, this `~~'''day of ~~ Y ~A~p. / Notary Pub,~ic ""- ~" Print Name My Commi ,~~•• _ O1P L~! ThOAAAS CHARLES NloSH II 1 1T (~ K /t ~ C:C~.IMI,S.SIC7N NUMBER ~cp ~ rcanoas I Qc?~ TAY ~.ri:,t,AISSFON EXPIRES F OF F~..o..,..o,,...~~.. M1d{, F!.'14,~00,9 H:\Data\Aty\TCN\~DOCS\COYOTE.DEU - 3 ` ~ P INELLRS~OUNTY' FLR , OFF,REC,BK 11084 PG 2036 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAC 2 ~~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIr( OF CLEp,RV'JATER STATE OF MAINE COUNTY OF ~v~(csGK. P INEL OFF , REC . BK 1 1074 PG 785 I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, WILLIAM C. GREGG, III, a married person, to me personally known or who has produced •DY 1 Vtr `'S ~ j ~~rtS•~--- as identification, and known to me to be the individual described i.n and who executed the foregoing instrument as his free act and deed., and acknowledged before me that he executed the same for the purposes therein expressed on behalf of the partnership. WITNESS my hand and official seal at so~~4-t"~aoa+' l~/b~city] said County and State, this ~ S'H" day of ~21~_, 2000. Notary Public Print Name ~C-t'~ 1-]- ~--a,~'Fs~ My Commission Expires : ~'J1~ a.$`~O~v STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS _ I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to ad<<Zinister oaths and take acknowledgments, THOMAS E. McCUNE, a married p rson, to me personally known or who has produced ~-e-~~ C.e~~ as identification, and' nown to me to be the indivi ua escri e and who executed the foregoing instrument as his free act, and dEed, and acknowledged before me that he .executed the same for the purposes therein expressed on behalf of the partnership. WITNESS my hand and official seal at Clearwater, said County and State, this ~ 7n) day of ' fQM~~-z, 2000. ~~w.~-1,~.~ ~. Notary Public Print Name ~J ~~'~~ "~ • ~~~ My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I IiER.E~CERTIFY, th;~t on this day personally appeared before me an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take cknowledgments~,ROBERT P. HORST, a married person, to me ersonally known~'or who has produced as i en -~-eation, and known to me to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as his free act and deed, and acknowledged before me that he executed the same for the purposes therein expressed on behalf of the partnership. WITNESS my hand and official seal /at Clearw ter, sa d County and State., this `-day of u _.~f- _, 00. r~ Notary ~ -ic'~ crnaM,S.s~oN Nu Print N ~~ My Comm ~ t~` xp~:~r,~ H:\Data\Aty\TCN\DOCS\COYOTE.DED -4- EXHIBIT "A" • PINELLRS COUNTY FLR, OFF,REC,BK 11084 PG 2037 Parcel A • All of Lots One (1) and Two (2) of Block Five (5) of JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in'Plat Book 1, page 13, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was formerly apart. Parcel B Lot Four (4), LESS the Easterly 30 feet thereof and al•1 of Lot Three (3), Block 5 of JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TD CLEARWAiF,R iixRBOR, according tc the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, page 13, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was formerly apart. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAC 2 ~~ 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEA.R.WATER i ~_", _ I -.a.. .:r ~ c.: i_..~ 1 f.._.. f-r.1 ~ _ 1 ::]i i__-7 1 ;...... i r l _ ._..~• f-~ 1 _....i ~ r..~ ~ ..., i .., 1 i r-r i , . „ . .. r., I ..~ ~ ' 'a .i > r i I , f:!.) ~. I c-°/ , ~ -, .:r - . i .~-, '' I , I 1"r'1 ....,.., I _.~ I t..a . ~ } 2i3 +}Y I ~t+1~ Ci 7 L-~r+ _C'• „f.;. I -C,'• . x .' I .11 ~ • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 September 08, 2006 FOWLER & ASSOC 1421 COURT ST SUITE D CLEARWATER, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-03016 (Located at 520 DREW ST) Dear : FOWLER & ASSOC VIA FAX: ~ y~-~_ 533 There has been no activity with regards to your application, case number: FLD2006-03016 in the last five (5) months. Please find attached comments related to this case that are still outstanding. Your application will become WITHDRAWN unless these comments are addressed prior to: Monday, October 9, 2006.- o ~~.'~~ This will be your only notification. Please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582 should you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, John Schodtler, Planner II cc: File 6 Month No Activity Letter ~ ~ Sep. 08 2006 11:33AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94475339 Sep. 08 11:30AM 03'09 SND 05 OK TO TURN OFF FORT, PRESS ' N~#J' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CALL 1~-HELP-FAX C435-7.1291. 1-t~i ty • ' ' • ;~'~`~~'~N~i~~ Conditions Associated With ~~' Y', tom= ~ FLD2006-03016 ~~~~~~}~~~, 520 DREW ST Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4773 04/20/2006 Prior to CDB: Not Met 1. In accordance with Community Development Code Section 4-202, show all existing and proposed utilities. 2. Additional comments may result from submittal of requested information. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense (City Ordinance 7573-06). If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Environmental Condition Heather Faessle 562-4897 04/18/2006 See Stormwater Conditions. Not Met Fire Condition James Keller 562-4327 x3062 04/24/2006 Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an Not Met adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 04/24/2006 An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Not Met Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB. 04/24/2006 Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300' of building as hose lays and Not Met on same side of street as building. PRIOR TO CDB 04/24/2006 FDC is required, and shall be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within Not Met 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve. PRIOR TO CDB 04/24/2006 Afire sprinkler system in accordance with 2002 NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB Not Met 04/24/2006 Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Not Met Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 04/24/2006 Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, Not Met completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Required Standpipe Systems shall be in place before construction can proceed to the next level. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 04/24/2006 Fire Alarm System in accordance with NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 shall be installed, acknowledge Not Met PRIOR TO CDB 04/24/2006 PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY Not Met OF CODES. Print Date: 09/08/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 4 • FLD2006-03016 520 DREW ST Landscape 04/11 /2006 04/11 /2006 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 Revise landscaping along the north property line to be installed on the subject property and not in the alley. ADA access way to Fort Harrison Avenue is not shown in the Landscape plan. Revise. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 Not Met Not Met 04/24/2006 The tree survey is incomplete. All trees 4"DBH and greater must be shown on all plan sheets prior Not Met to CDB. 04/24/2006 Civil drawings required, additional comments will be forthcoming once this data is received and Not Met reviewed. Note, utility locations and proposed grades will be scrutinized, suggest that the design accommodate the trees to be preserved. Submit prior to CDB. 04/24/2006 The tree barricade detail does not meet city standards. Revise prior to building permit. Not Met 04/24/2006 Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape Not Met architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, . actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 04/14/2006 Prior to CDB: Not Met 1) The site plan shall be signed and sealed by an Engineer with existing and proposed elevations on site and 50 foot adjacent to the site in all directions. 2) Provide a cross section of the proposed swale and calculations to show that the City water quality volume can be adequately provided in this area. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) The applicant is to provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 2) Provide impervious area calculations for the existing and proposed site so that the payment-in-lieu of retention requirement can be paid by the developer. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 04/21/2006 Please explain how Sw service as it pertains to the restaurant as enclosure shown is where their Not Met dumpster is located Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 04/20/2006 Site visibility triangles are based from edge of the property line. Remove any objects inside the Not Met sight visibility triangle not meeting the criteria established in the Clearwater Community Development Code Section 3-904, i.e. parking spaces. 2. The two driveways to Drew Street do not meet spacing requirements of the Clearwater Community Development Code Section 3-102 (125 feet). Either redesign in accordance with the Code requirement or provide a letter from a Registered Professional Engineer justifying the driveway layout and indicating that the driveway will operate safely. 3. Demonstrate how a parked scaled passenger car 18' in length can exit the end most parking stalls. CaseConditons Print Date: 09/08/2006 Page 2 of 4 i FLD2006-03016 520 DREW ST Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 4. Provide wheelstops in parking spaces that abut sidewalk. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. 562-4775 General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 04/06/2006 The addition of parking stops will prevent vehicles from overhanging the five foot sidewalk. Not Met 04/06/2006 Provide a copy of the Unity of Title prior to Development Order . Not Met 04/06/2006 Provide additional details for the dumpster enclosure. Materials, Design, Color, Type of Gate. Not Met 04/06/2006 Indicate on the site plan the location of all utility (elec, water, gas meters) and mechanical Not Met equiptment. Staff also recommends placing a general note on the plans. example: "The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately." 04/06/2006 Clarify if the thought of hurrican shutters have been considered for this property. The downtown Not Met guidelines state that hurrican shutters, if provided, are fitted as an integral part of the design, not visible when not in use and only to be used during the timeframe in which a formally issued hurrican warning is in effect. 04/06/2006 Clarify on the plans the type of fabric/material to be utilized on the awnings. The downtown Not Met guidelines state awnings made of high gloss fabrics which appear to be plastic are inappropriate. 04/06/2006 Add detailed drawings of the architectural features (the doors, windows, exterior lighting, signage, Not Met decorative balcony railings, and cornices) including color, material and other fine details to the plans. 04/06/2006 Clarify if any site lighting is proposed. Not Met 04/06/2006 That address numerals unobtrusive in location and in scale with other design elements on the Not Met building facade be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit. 04/06/2006 How are guttgrg and/Or dnwn~poiitg t0 be handled? If they are not external to the building fa~adg Nnt Mgt provide a note to plans indicating how they will be handled. 04/06/2006 Are awnings to be backlit? If not, please note on the plans awnings to not be backlit. Not Met 04/06/2006 What type of glass is to be installed on the ground floor? The downtown guidelines state clear Not Met glass (88 percent light transmission or the maximum permitted by any applicable building codes) installed on ground floor windows except for stained or art glass provided the stained or art glass is in character with the style of the building and/or use (churches, craftsman buildings, etc.). 04/06/2006 Have signs on the side and rear entrances been considered? Not Met 04/10/2006 The revised site plan and site data table submitted for completeness (04/10/06) lost one parking Not Met space. 32 down to 31. Revise request or the site plan and site data table. 04/10/2006 The building height is measured from existing grade. The building elevations indicate the height Not Met measured from "GR. FLOOR". Clarify. 04/10/2006 When parapet walls are utilized they are limited to 30 inches over the maximum height specified Not Met (40 feet), even when proposed to screen mechanical equipment. **Staff is confident that an CaseConditons Print Date: 09/08/2006 Page 3 of 4 FLD2006-03016 520 DREW ST Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 acceptable alternative can be produced that we can stand behind. Provide a roofing plan with any proposed alternatives. 04/11/2006 The proposed building elevation indicate EIFS over masonry. This does not comply with the Not Met downtown design guidelines. EIFS -Exterior Insulated Finish System materials used on the first three floors of a building exterior are considered inappropriate. Staff feels that the use of a more durable material within the first three floors of all the building would be something we could stand behind. ie: wood, stucco, and/or masonry. 04/11/2006 What is proposed of the existing six foot tall wood fence located between the two lots? Not Met 04/11/2006 The minimum depth of a 90 degree parking space has recently been reduced from 19 to 18 feet. Not Met Staff would like to see the utilization of this change to shorten the parking spaces east of the proposed building to obtain a five foot wide landscape, swale area 04/11/2006 All three parking lots are adjacent to rights of way and are required to be screened with either a Not Met landscaped buffer or a solid wall or fence three feet in height. 04/11/2006 The landscaping between the north drive through lane and the alley needs to be increased to Not Met minimize negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views. You have demonstrated this with the parking lot and the adjacent building to the east. Good job. 04/11/2006 Show all freestanding signs located on the property and in the street right of way on the site and Not Met landscape plans. The master streetscape plan required enhanced levels of landscaping and identification signage on both Fort Harrisona Avenue (Downtown Corridor) and Drew Street (Commercial A). 04/11/2006 Downtown Corridor streetscape treatments (Downtown Design Guidelines pgs 159-177) specifies Not Met a significantly high level of streetscape treatment for this street because of their function as the major pedestrian streets within the Downtown. Improvements include a variety of paving materials, medians, palm and oak trees, decorative lighting fixtures that can support banners and hanging plants, a fountain plaza and wrought iron style street furnishings. The plan includes the placement of finials, urns, and other street furniture throughout the area ro provide an interesting pedestrian experience. 04/11/2006 Commercial A streetscape treatments (Downtown Design Guidelines pgs 160, 182-186) specifies Not Met that date palms will line the steets with oaks located landscape island in the center of the street where right of way widths permit. Street furnishings, decorative lights and pavers are also included in this design. These streets are more vehicular than pedestrian oriented. ~4~21 X2008 Incorporation of decorative pavers on both citac acnarially ~tihera nariPCtrian and VehIC!llar pathg ,ftlt>t Met v ~ ~ r,...,......~ .. ~.,„...„.,... intersect is required. These improvements are considered appropriate by the Downtown Design Guidelines. 04/21/2006 Provide photographs and sizes of all signs located on the Checkers site. Not Met Print Date: 09/08/2006 CaseConditons Page 4 of 4 ^^^ ^^ 8 May 2006 i Mr. John Schodtler, Planner City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FI 33767 Re: 520 Drew Street Dear John, a~td~~o ~o,wo uvreaQ ~rv-navrna 9002 S ~ ~bW a3/113~3~ Please accept this as our formal request to place the above referenced project on hold. The loss of density and the cost of the site improvements make the project not economically feasible at this time. We understand that the city's policy is to keep the file as "hold" for a six month period and should the developer not wish to proceed, the file will be considered withdrawn. Thank you for your assistance. You rstfiu ly, .. ~ -~. ~ Step en R. Fowler, AIA, NCARB SRF:mmf Cc: Mr. James Sofronas ^ FOWLER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC. ^ AA001665 ^ ^ 142 i COURT STREET ^ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 ^ 727-449-2021 ^ • . Page 1 of 1 Schodtler, John From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 4:57 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: FW: Checkers/ Mixed use project on Drew For your case file. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 11:40 AM To: 'FOWLERARCH@aol.com' Subject: RE: Checkers/ Mixed use project on Drew Steve - While the Plan provides for "mixed-use," the Downtown Zoning District does not; therefore, you still need to apply for Comp. Infill. I don't see major issues with the reason you have to apply as such, and it can be explained away. A quirk of the Code. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: FOWLERA - [mailto:FOWLERARCH@aol.com] Sent: Monday, arch 06, 2006 1:36 AM To: Wells, Wayn Subject: Checkers/ Mixed use project on Drew Wayne, After our meeting, I was reviewing the "Old Bay District" information, and the "District Vision", Uses: "envisioned mixed-use neighborhood" projects (page 63). Hearing this, do we still need to go through the Comprehensive In-fill process? It feels counter productive as well as a time burner...thanks. Steve Fowler 449-2021 5/11/2006 • Page 1 of 1 Schodtler, John From: FOWLERARCH@aol.com Sent: onday, May 08 006 10:49 AM To: S ~~fier°~~~iri Subject: Re: Case Conditions 520 Drew Street (WORD format) John, Due to the reduction of density and the cost of development on the referenced site, the project is not economically feasible at this time. Therefore, the owner has requested that the project be placed on hold until further notice. I will be sending you a letter to this effect today. Thank you for your assistance. Steve Fowler 449-2021 5/8/2006 '~ • • ' X0.25 am Case Number: FLD2006-03016 -- 520 DREW ST • Owner(s): Jameschris Corp 431 Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Fowler & Assoc 1421 Court St Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: 727-449-2021, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: fowlerarch@aol.com Location: 0.717 acres located at the northwest comer of Drew Street and North Fort Harrison Avenue. Atlas Page: 277B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development approval for a mixed use project with an existing 514 square foot restaurant (Checkers), 3,133 square feet of new retail sales, and nine residential apartment units to be located in the Downtown Old Bay district including an additional 9.33 feet for elevator equipment (from roof deck) and a building within a required sight visibility triangle along Drew Street, as a Comprehensive Infill Development Project, per Section 2-903.C. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 1828 Venetian Point Drive TELEPHONE: 461-0564, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: southern@tampabay.rr.com Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner II Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . .Prior to CDB: 1. In accordance with Community Development Code Section 4-202, show all existing and 5! ~~ Q proposed utilities. 2. Additional comments may result from submittal of requested information. 12:0o ti~J -'~~ General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense (City Ordinance 7573-06). If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Environmental: See Stormwater Conditions. Fire: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, May 4, 2006 -Page 10 r 1 2 3 4 ~~`~ J • '~,M1~ s J~'~~ ~~6 mot,"~' ~ ~:r ~,~ ~~1 ~~ d~ `~~~ . • Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB. Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300' of building as hose lays and on same side of street as building. PRIOR TO CDB Ncw rs ~ ~, ~ s F- R ~ ~ iYfl t~Av'7- v>N~ c~a,N- ~~ F Raµ FDC is required, and shall be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve. PRIOR TO CDB A fire sprinkler system in accordance with 2002 NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 7 . Where underground water mains and hydrants aze to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Required Standpipe Systems shall be in place before construction can proceed to the next level. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB g , Fire Alarm System in accordance with NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 shall be installed, acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 9 . PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: C,~A1r~L~~td, No Comments Land Resources: / ~ a G'~«"" ~~ Td ~~G IG 1 . The tree survey is incomplete. All trees 4"DBH and greater must be shown on all plan sheets prior to CDB. 2 . Civil drawings required, additional comments will be forthcoming once this data is received and reviewed. Note, utility locations and proposed grades will be scrutinized, suggest that the design ' accommodate the trees to be preserved. Submit prior to CDB. 3 . The tree barricade detail does not meet city standards. Revise prior to building permit. 4 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree bamcade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: ~. Revise landscaping along the north property line to be installed on the subject property and not ~ in the alley. / 2 , ADA access way to Fort Harrison Avenue is not shown in the Landscape plan. Revise. Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stormwater: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, May 4, 2006 -Page 11 ~,, ~Ml t..ts u cry ~~ Cs,a V6 "'tom-~~ Prior to CDB: 1) The site plan shall be signed and sealed by an Engineer with existing and proposed elevations on site and 50 foot adjacent to the site in all directions. 2) Provide a cross section of the proposed Swale and calculations to show that the City water quality volume can be adequately provided in this area. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) The applicant is to provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 2) Provide impervious area calaulations for the existing and proposed site so that the payment-in-lieu of retention requirement can be paid by the developer. Solid Waste: 1 , Please explain how Sw service as it pertains to the restaurant as enclosure shown is where their dumpster is located ~i1 G Y~ pN ~„pA~ ~ F11-i 1~AY / ~~Q,p QOfiP.~ LO~,i"~'pi>a Traffic Engineering: ~~'%/ 6~ 1 , (~ Site visibility triangles are based from edge of the property line. Remove any objects inside the sight visibility triangle not meeting the criteria established in the Clearwater Community Development Code Section 3-904, i.e. parking spaces. ~2. The two driveways to Drew Street do not meet spacing requirements of the Clearwater Community Development Code Section 3-102 (125 feet). Either redesign in accordance with the Code requirement or provide a letter from a Registered Professional Engineer justifying the driveway layout and indicating that the driveway will operate safely. 3. Demonstrate how a parked scaled passenger car 18' in length can exit the endmost parking stalls. 4. Provide wheelstops in parking spaces that abut sidewalk. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: y ~K"~' 1C»H ~ovDA1.+~crs ~ N 0 t•3~ pg~.. ~I~TK o rJ }~pyJ ~'R.~N w11L. F36 NA.~bu6t~ . Development Review Agenda -Thursday, May 4, 2006 -Page 12 ,~ ~ ~ 1 . The addition of parking stops will prevent vehicles from overhanging the five foot sidewalk. 2 . Provide a copy of the Unity of Title prior to Development Order . 3 . Provide additional details for the dumpster enclosure. Materials, Design, Color, Type of Gate. 4 . Indicate on the site plan the location of all utility (elec, water, gas meters) and mechanical equiptment. Staff also recommends placing a general note on the plans. example: "The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately." 5 . Clarify if the thought of hurrican shutters have been considered for this property. The downtown guidelines state that hurrican shutters, if provided, are fitted as an integral part of the design, not visible when not in use and only to be used during the timeframe in which a formally issued hurrican warning is in effect. 6 . Clarify on the plans the type of fabric/material to be utilized on the awnings. The downtown guidelines state awnings made of high gloss fabrics which appear to be plastic are inappropriate. 7 . .Add detailed drawings of the architectural features (the doors, windows, exterior lighting, signage, decorative balcony railings, and cornices) including color, material and other fine details to the plans. 8 . Clarify if any site lighting is proposed. 9 . That address numerals unobtrusive in location and in scale with other design elements on the building facade be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10 . How are gutters and/or downspouts to be handled? If they are not external to the building facade provide a note to plans indicating how they will be handled. 11 . Are awnings to be backlit? If not, please note on the plans awnings to not be backlit. 12 . What type of glass is to be installed on the ground floor? The downtown guidelines state clear glass (88 percent light transmission or the maximum permitted by any applicable building codes) installed on ground floor windows except for stained or art glass provided the stained or art glass is in character with the style of the building and/or use (churches, craftsman buildings, etc.). 13 . Have signs on the side and rear entrances been considered? 14 . The revised site plan and site data table submitted for completeness (04/10/06) lost one parking space. 32 down to 31. Revise request or the site plan and site data table. 15 . The building height is measured from existing grade. The building elevations indicate the height measured from "GR. FLOOR". Clarify. 16 . When parapet walls are utilized they are limited to 30 inches over the maximum height specified (40 feet), even when proposed to screen mechanical equipment. **Staff is confident that an acceptable alternative can be produced that we can stand behind. Provide a roofing plan with any proposed alternatives. 17 . The proposed building elevation indicate EIFS over masonry. This does not comply with the downtown design guidelines. EIFS -Exterior Insulated Finish System materials used on the first three floors of a building exterior are considered inappropriate. Staff feels that the use of a more durable material within the first three floors of all the building would be something we could stand behind. ie: wood, stucco, and/or masonry. 18 . What is proposed of the existing six foot tall wood fence located between the two lots? 19 . The minimum depth of a 90 degree parking space has recently been reduced from 19 to 18 feet. Staff would like to see the utilization of this change to shorten the parking spaces east of the proposed building to obtain a five foot wide landscape, Swale area 20 . All three parking lots are adjacent to rights of way and are required to be screened with either a landscaped buffer or a solid wall or fence three feet in height. 21 . The landscaping between the north drive through lane and the alley needs to be increased to minimize negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views. You have demonstrated this with the parking lot and the adjacent building to the east. Good job. 22 . Show all freestanding signs located on the property and in the street right of way on the site and landscape plans. The master streetscape plan required enhanced levels of landscaping and identification signage on both Fort Hamsona Avenue (Downtown Corridor) and Drew Street (Commercial A). 23 . Downtown Comdor streetscape treatments (Downtown Design Guidelines pgs 159-177) specifies a significantly high level of streetscape treatment for this street because of their function as the major pedestrian streets within the Downtown. Improvements include a variety of paving materials, medians, palm and oak trees, decorative lighting fixtures that can support banners and hanging plants, a fountain plaza and wrought iron style street furnishings. The plan includes the placement of finials, urns, and other street furniture throughout the area ro provide an interesting pedestrian experience. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, May 4, 2006 -Page 13 Notes: 24 . Commercial A streetscape treatments (Downtown Design Guidelines pgs 160, ] 82-186) specifies that date palms will line the steets with oaks located landscape island in the center of the street where right of way widths permit. Street furnishings, decorative lights and pavers are also included in this design. These streets are more vehicular than pedestrian oriented. 25 . Incorporation of decorative pavers on both sites especially where pedestrian and vehicular paths intersect is required. These improvements are considered appropriate by the Downtown Design Guidelines. 26 . Provide photographs and sizes of all signs located on the Checkers site. Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda -Thursday, May 4, 2006 -Page 14 Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC 0 Case No. ~LDzoy~ ~- ~~~~~ Meeting Date: ~J~ ~ ~, ~~~ Location: S-~ ~ ~ ~~ ~.! S ~ o Current Use: Active Code Enforcement Case (no) yes: Address number (yes) (no vacant land Landscaping (yes no Overgrown (yes) (no Debris (yes) (~j Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor) vacant larui) ^ ,Fencing (one (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ^ Paint (good) (fair) (poor) (garish) ^ Grass Parking (yes) no o Residential Parking Violations (yes) o Signage on (ok) (not ok) (billboard) ^ Parkin4 /a (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) ^ Dumpster nclosed (not enclosed) ^ Outdoor storage (yes Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date: Reviewed by: ~~`~~ Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 Telephone: s7~L- ~~3Z Mixed Use Calculation • Take Permitted FAR O.~ OX Building Square Footage of non-residential portion 3 b ~ Z = Lot size required to support non-residential use in the building ) ~ 23.5 Subtract the lot size required to support non-residential use in the building 1 a 2.3.5 - from the total lot si ` 312.. S ~ =square footage to calculated the residential density from 2 9A~ 31 • a Divide square footage to calculated the density from Acres 0 . (0 7 S Multiply acres ~ s 10 7 S X Density allowed ) h ZS / an acre, 43560 = = Residential Dwelling units -~~~~e ~btih ~n ~ ~'~ ~~ ~ n "n ~~ C~~k~~ ~E~.. w~~ S:IP/anning DeparfinentlCa/culationslMixed Use Calculation 5.6.05.doc EXISTIN~SITE IMPROVE~1ENTS ~ .- -~ '~' TO RtMAIN ' ~, ALLEY _ ~' ~~ ,- -r ~ ~'/ 1 I~ DRIVEWAY r -.~....._..._ P 251.12' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ -~ ° / ooDDDDOD~, t / N F +...W.~ . 1 ,~ , oDDDDDD^ .~ < _ v/ a 1 / ~' ~ oooDDODO~ ........ m ^oDOODOO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +~~V ~ ~' oDOOOOODr ~ ~ ` ~ I D D D D D D D D . `>mo` 5e'Pai.o~~.~~e~ /1 ~ K DDDDDDDD I DooDOOOO~ .`.` ,`. ," ~ ~ / , ^DDD^ Doc DoDDOD^ . . .`.`.'. .~ I R ^DDDO oo Paverls, t ' Z DoDOO~oDr~ I 9o DDOOopp~DDD^ -~ .".`.'. . .'.`..`~ ~ ~ ^ooooo oI~ DDOOdDDO~ DD Doc 24'- -~ DD~t+p'DDD .. .y. . ~..~.. ~ j VR OC Q ^DDD~DDODD ` `V` ~ ~+~ ` ~ ~~~ '~ DDDDDDDDDaD ~DDDDOOD^ F ~/ ~ DDDDDDDD^ DDDOD^DOD`. ~ 6 1 D DDDDDDDD^ DDDDDDDD' z / 50' ~\ DD D ^ DoDDDODOO.~. ~ o I P P DDDDDDODDDD DDDDDDDD (U Q Existing oak tree \ ooDODDDOD DDDOODDOO`,' DDDDOODODgti DDDDDDDD. N O to be removed \\ oDODDOOOOB' ^DDDOODD^ ~m DDDDDDDD `. ~U ~/ O ~- ooDDDODDD ^DDDDDDDD-~ ~ '~ DDOOODDOOD DDDDDDDD, ~/ ~ •~ ^DDDDDDDD ^DDDDDDDD ~1 ~ , i o `.~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~- ~ Hew ~ ~ r r t- ~ ~- `~ Stor Retail `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ° W Res. uildinq ,L~, ~ ~~~ Q HC Z m vesting oak tree 4' HIGH MASON Y , ~ to be removed -' t IRON SCREEN; WAL1 u ~ H P ~ ['O~ o dOlS m D P ~ _ - ~ 7 ~~ 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK i3' GREENSPACE LIGHT POLE 4.3' CsREENSPACE L' CURB DREW STREET ((,0' RIGHT-OI=-WAY') 40'PAVEMENT CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN ttl ~ -- ~ ~ LAND USE DATA: NEW MIXED USE SITE ragirsd EXISTRIG PROPOSED MOl a MAX ~~ ~ -- DOWNTOWN lD) N/A N/A ti - Clatkan t Varart Sae Retal/Readantd Mead Una N/A Lat ra I-f. atd ntJ '-,:~ re• I•tYn nab:;'--d~ 31255 e.f =O 1115 Ac NO CHANGE N/A 5D 1r NO CHANGE N/A ~~.~ 125 ft NO CHANGE N/A @I~L.` a Evr-~: '-' -' 1L d Qor att> 51~ al 4ZL4 e.f 3 LA; N/A ____ __ ~ e ~ o . X25 •f ~ O 023 II lL4 a.f = O 38 N/A Reader~td a~ p L N/A Satbecw liw ndrde bwrraa as ate pln ~~ u..... p' 45'+/- 50' hex ~ ~ T,r.l f,. ~L. N l.f aid f, d .ee)• SEE NOTE ~.q (p~~~ faaikl• 19 32 2L BELOW REQUIRED PARKING: RESTAURANT: 514 S.F. • 10 SPACES / 1000 S.F. = 5 SPACES RETAIL: 3133 S.F.• 4 SPACES /IAOOS.F. = I2 SPACES RESIDENTIAL: 1.5 SPACES /UNIT. = 9 SPACES DENSITY CACIlLATIONS: - Perrtted Fbar Area Rat,o (FART: 0.'f0 x Area d narerdantrel paUat 3A'll a.I. =lot ara regwed to a{ipat narreadmt+d ae = 9A1 •J. Totd area d arts: 3155 a.f. kes narreYdenUd wed 9A1 a!. = 22138 J. = 0.51 Ac. A{aabk denrty: IB u.p.a. x 0.51 Ac = 9 iMa ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF UNITS: 9 ' ,r • CITY (~F CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 May 03, 2006 FOWLER & ASSOC 1421 COURT ST SUITE D CLEARWATER, FL 33756 RE: FLS2005-12103 LOCATED AT - 520 DREW ST Dear : FOWLER & ASSOC The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee (PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLS2005-12103. These comments are generated early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting on: Thursday, May 4, 2006 Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that maybe generated at the DRC meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting. If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582. Sincerely, John Schodtler, Planner II cc: File DRC Pre-DRC Comments Mail Out 'it6.'~a"a. ~; ~ _~p r` °~~'~ ~~ Engineering Condition 04/20/2006 Prior to CDB: Steve Doherty 1. In accordance with Community Development Code Section 4-202, show all existing and proposed utilities. 2. Additional comments may result from submittal of requested information. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense (City Ordinance 7573-06). If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Environmental Condition 04/18/2006 See Stormwater Conditions. Not Met Not Met Fire Condition James Keller 562-4327 x3062 04/24/2006 Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an - Not Met adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 04/24/2006 An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Not Met Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB. 04/24/2006 Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300' of building as hose lays and Not Met on same side of street as building. PRIOR TO CDB 04/24/2006 FDC is required, and shall be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within Not Met 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve. PRIOR TO CDB 04/24/2006 Afire sprinkler system in accordance with 2002 NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB Not Met 04/24/2006 Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Not Met Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 04/24/2006 Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, Not Met completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Required Standpipe Systems shall be in place before construction can proceed to the next level. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 04/24/2006 Fire Alarm System in accordance with NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 shall be installed, acknowledge Not Met PRIOR TO CDB 04/24/2006 PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY Not Met OF CODES. Print Date: 05/03/2006 ( • Conditions Associated With FLD2006-03016 520 DREW ST CaseConditons Heather Faessle 562-4897 562-4773 Page 1 of 4 • r ! • FLD2006-03016 520 DREW ST Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 04/11/2006 Revise landscaping along the north property line to be installed on the subject property and not ih the alley. 04/11/2006 ADA access way to Fort Harrison Avenue is not shown in the Landscape plan. Revise. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 Not Met Not Met 04/24/2006 The tree survey is incomplete. All trees 4"DBH and greater must be shown on all plan sheets prior Not Met to CDB. 04/24/2006 Civil drawings required, additional comments will be forthcoming once this data is received and Not Met reviewed. Note, utility locations and proposed grades will be scrutinized, suggest that the design accommodate the trees to be preserved. Submit prior to CDB. 04/24/2006 The tree barricade detail does not meet city standards. Revise prior to building permit. Not Met 04/24/2006 Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape Not Met architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 04/14/2006 Prior to CDB: Not Met 1) The site plan shall be signed and sealed by an Engineer with existing and proposed elevations on site and 50 foot adjacent to the site in all directions. 2) Provide a cross section of the proposed swale and calculations to show that the City water quality volume can be adequately provided in this area. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) The applicant is to provide a copyof the approved SWFWMD permit. 2) Provide impervious area calaulations for the existing and proposed site so~that the payment-in-lieu of retention requirement can be paid by the developer. Solid Waste Condition 04/21/2006 Please explain how Sw service as it pertains to the restaurant as enclosure shown is where their dumpster is located Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 04/20/2006 Site visibility triangles are based from edge of the property line. Remove any objects inside the sight visibility triangle not meeting the criteria established in the Clearwater Community Development Code Section 3-904, i.e. parking spaces. 2. The two driveways to Drew Street do not meet spacing requirements of the Clearwater Community Development Code Section 3-102 (125 feet). Either~redesign in accordance with the Code requirement or provide a letter from a Registered Professional Engineer justifying the driveway layout and indicating that the driveway will operate safely. 3. Demonstrate how a parked scaled passenger car 18' in length can exit the end most parking stalls. Tom Glenn 562-4930 Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 05/03/2006 Page 2 of 4 • FLD2006-03016 520 DREW ST Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 4. Provide wheelstops in parking spaces that abut sidewalk. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. 562-4775 General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 04/06/2006 The addition of parking stops will prevent vehicles from overhanging the five foot sidewalk. Not Met 04/06/2006 Provide a copy of the Unity of Title prior to Development Order . Not Met 04/06/2006 Provide additional details for the dumpster enclosure. Materials, Design, Color, Type of Gate. Not Met 04/06/2006 Indicate on the site plan the location of all utility (elec, water, gas meters) and mechanical Not Met equiptment. Staff also recommends placing a general note on the plans. example: "The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately." 04/06/2006 Clarify if the thought of hurrican shutters have been considered for this property. The downtown Not Met guidelines state that hurrican shutters, if provided, are fitted as an integral part of the design, not visible when not in use and only to be used during the timeframe in which a formally issued hurrican warning is in effect. 04/06/2006 Clarify on the plans the type of fabric/material to be utilized on the awnings. The downtown Not Met guidelines state awnings made of high gloss fabrics which appear to be plastic are inappropriate. 04/06/2006 Add detailed drawings of the architectural features (the doors, windows, exterior lighting, signage, Not Met decorative balcony railings, and cornices) including color, material and other fine details to the plans. 04/06/2006 Clarify if any site lighting is proposed. Not Met 04/06/2006 That address numerals unobtrusive in location and in scale with other design elements on the Not Met building facade be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit. 04/06/2006 How are gutters and/or downspouts to be handled? If they are not external to the building facade Not Met provide a note to plans indicating how they will be handled. 04/06/2006 Are awnings to be backlit? If not, please note on the plans awnings to not be backlit. Not Met 04/06/2006 What type of glass is to be installed on the ground floor? The downtown guidelines state clear Not Met glass (88 percent light transmission or the maximum permitted by any applicable building codes) installed on ground floor windows except for stained or art glass provided the stained or art glass is in character with the style of the building and/or use (churches, craftsman buildings, etc.). 04/06/2006 Have signs on the side and rear entrances been considered? Not Met 04/10/2006 The revised site plan and site data table submitted for completeness (04/10/06) lost one parking Not Met space. 32 down to 31. Revise request or the site plan and site data table. 04/10/2006 The building height is measured from existing grade. The building elevations indicate the height Not Met measured from "G R. FLOOR". Clarify. 04/10/2006 When parapet walls are utilized they are limited to 30 inches over the maximum height specified Not Met (40 feet), even when proposed to screen mechanical equipment. *'`Staff is confident that an CaseConditons Print Date: 05/03/2006 Page 3 of 4 FLD2006-03016 520 DREW ST • Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 acceptable alternative can be produced that we can stand behind. Provide a roofing plan with any proposed alternatives. 04/11/2006 The proposed building elevation indicate EIFS over masonry. This does not comply with the Not Met downtown design guidelines. EIFS -Exterior Insulated Finish System materials used on the first three floors of a building exterior are considered inappropriate. Staff feels that the use of a more durable material within the first three floors of all the building would be something we could stand behind. ie: wood, stucco, and/or masonry. 04/11/2006 What is proposed of the existing six foot tall wood fence located between the two lots? Not Met 04/11/2006 The minimum depth of a 90 degree parking space has recently been reduced from 19 to 18 feet. Not Met Staff would like to see the utilization of this change to shorten the parking spaces east of the proposed building to obtain a five foot wide landscape, swale area 04/11/2006 All three parking lots are adjacent to rights of way and are required to be screened with either a Not Met landscaped buffer or a solid wall or fence three feet in height. 04/11/2006 The landscaping between the north drive through lane and the alley needs to be increased to Not Met minimize negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views. You have demonstrated this with the parking lot and the adjacent building to the east. Good job. 04/11/2006 Show all freestanding signs located on the property and in the street right of way on the site and Not Met landscape plans. The master streetscape plan required enhanced levels of landscaping and identification signage on both Fort Harrisona Avenue (Downtown Corridor) and Drew Street (Commercial A). 04/11/2006 Downtown Corridor streetscape treatments (Downtown Design Guidelines pgs 159-177) specifies Not Met a significantly high level of streetscape treatment for this street because of their function as the major pedestrian streets within the Downtown. Improvements include a variety of paving materials, medians, palm and oak trees, decorative lighting fixtures that can support banners and hanging plants, a fountain plaza and wrought iron style street furnishings. The plan includes the placement of finials, urns, and other street furniture throughout the area ro provide an interesting pedestrian experience. 04/11/2006 Commercial A streetscape treatments (Downtown Design Guidelines pgs 160, 182-186) specifies Not Met that date palms will line the steets with oaks located landscape island in the center of the street where right of way widths permit. Street furnishings, decorative lights and pavers are also included in this design. These streets are more vehicular than pedestrian oriented. 04/21/2006 Incorporation of decorative pavers on both sites especially where pedestrian and vehicular paths Not Met intersect is required. These improvements are considered appropriate by the Downtown Design Guidelines. 04/21/2006 Provide photographs and sizes of all signs located on the Checkers site. Not Met Print Date: 05/03/2006 CaseConditons Page 4 of 4 ~ ~ May. 03 2006 09:25AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USRGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94475339- May. 03 09:22AM 03'21 SND 05 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #t04. TI-®V SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADl1ANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-~-I-EiP-FA}{ C435-73291. "Clearwater April 10, 2006 Fowler & Assoc 1421 Court St Suite D Clearwater, Fl 33756 ~ µ _, Y~ CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM RE: FLD2006-03016 -- 520 DREW ST -- Letter of Completeness Dear Fowler & Assoc The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-03016. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on May 04, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. S chodtler@myclearwater. com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner II Letter ofCompleteness - FLD2006-03016 - 520 DREW ST ,1 j Apr. 10 2006 03:18PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94475339 Apr. 10 03:17PM 00'50 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MB+AJ' #84. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-~0-HELP-FAX C435-73297. o ~. }_~~ earwater U April 03, 2006 Fowler & Assoc 1421 Court St Suite D Clearwater, Fl 33756 ~CIT~ +C~F CLE~RWATER PLANN-ING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MYCLEARWATER. C OM RE: FLD2006-03016 -- 520 DREW ST -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Fowler & Assoc The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-03016. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide one signed and sealed survey and 14 copies for a total of 15 surveys. 2. Stormwater Plan acknowledgement in the application needs to be initialed 3. Traffic Impact Study acknowledgement in the application needs to be initialed 4. Complete section L of the application (Signature) 5. It is not understood how you have demonstrated that James L. Sofronas is the property owner. The warrenty deed does not list Mr. Sofronas. Clarify. 6. The required parking calculations have been rounded down. When the determination of the number of parking spaces results in a requirement of a fractional space, any fraction of one-half space or more shall be rounded up. Adjust the parking requirements to reflect so and perhaps adjust the minimum parking requirement for one of the uses from the top of the range (restaurant 15 spaces) to a lower amount (13 or 14 spaces what ever is required). 7. Provide the following items regarding the the building elevations: 1)dimensioned building elevations. The building elevations provided drawn to 1/8 inch scale appear to exceed the 40 foot maximum allowed; 2) color and material labells; 3) color chips or swatches. 8. Revise plans to include landscape, parking, and signage improvements to the Checkers portion of the property. 1) The existing landscaping has thinned out; 2) the parking spaces appear to be out of compliance for size; 3) ADA parking standards do not appear to be in compliance; 4) Freestanding sign is not in compliance with Downtown Guidelines. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Monday, April 10, 2006 (12:00 noon). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. S chodtler@myclearwater. com. Letter oflncompleteness - FLD2006-03016 - 520 DREW ST • ~ i r - ^.-„ o,`~~ ;~~ CITY OF CLE RW TER }~: earwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT `~~ y `~--~' MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER.COM Apri103, 2006 Sincerely yours, (~ ~ '~~ John Schodtler Planner II Letter of /ncompleteness - FLD2006-03016 - 520 DREW ST f Apr. 03 2006 01:18PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 81 94475339 Apr. 03 01:17PM 01'20 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REST, PRESS ' h~JU' #i84. TI-®J SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-~HB_P-FAX C435-7329). 1 :~ ~ M ' ,r ~ $ ~ .- ~f " ~; -- - ~ ' C + i~;~^F~'~' s - . F-Ssw 1~s R ` ~R t ~ ` ~! ~ i. ~ 7G~ i S ~ te ~\:~,rL ` ~ t. '~ '~ t1~ - tf i 1 4 ~ ~VV/ t~ .. s ' }r' ~ ~~ ~ F p t ~'~ . _ r ~., . '~ . ;r ... .a ~1- s ~, .-tom ~ ,~ t s _ ,~ ~, "~ ,~ ~"~.. „ ; ,~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ', 1' i 1 ~ f,,. ~ r,+ ~ it K ~~""~, r ~ r I ~ t L 'ti 1 . rJ y .w , ~ R j: ,, 4 m~ ~ ~ - s J J .~~ tr a , , r ~ ~. ~ r1. ~ ~y . :~ , /+. Y ~ ~ k /} `~~r ~ ~.,~t. ~ . w. it ~ g. '7.t'.1 ~. ~ . ~~ ~- --' ,.,r_E ., ~ ill -•a~+ 4 ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~~ A erial M ap Owner. Jameschrist Corporation Case: FLD2006-03016 Sites: 520 Drew Street Property 0.719 Size Acres Atlas 277B Pa e: PINS: 09/29/15/44352/005/0010 09129/15/44352/005/0030 S:\Pianning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLDJ\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\May 4, 2006 DRC\Drew St 520 Drew Street Shops (D-OBJ JVS\maps\Map Request Form.doc c: to co 403 2 .`~- 6 402 401 9 ~ q ~ h ~ a m ~ 10 400 401 a 3 8 HART ST `iJ t1 393 sao~ 314 312 311 31 co 321 z a ~ ~ 310 m m 0 N 3 a 7 308 309 M gOg 317 y s e i s 5 ~t~ 309 305 307 O A t 10 304 s 301 2 B 305 ~ t z 3 ~ a tO °D 301 z 3 a 300 s 44352 07940 3 300 t 2 A h a w n aHi °a o 443m3 h N h Yf h m b 4a3s2 JONES ST hr ~ ~ F A 01 ~` q ~ Q O `Q Q O O Q V 2~ Q Q tT ~ tc PnW a PKi, x~5 ~ s a 7 z ~ 37890 221 t t Q g $ z ~ PKL z X01 2 3 s OFC; 3° O t z 200 m 3 °~ ~ ~} a ~ 2 m m a ~ DREW ST 128 ,~ ~ i I s ~ 133 , ~ ~ PKT - 123 ~ 12 ~ t OFC PKL OFC 17 to a 6 7 s 1 .W1 1 ,ao. 118 123 ~ 10 5 122 120 W ~3 /(~ 11 ~ JJ// \ ~ 38 Z Q 4 1 1 .~~ '3 O Q J 1~ 3 O Z 5 1 36 ~ ~ s 59580 '~ i ~ 1 72 1~ a t (~ 101 7 m . i ~~ a s HENDERICKS ST 47 a 16 21 20 19 18 44 42 45t 1 8 ~ 3 g ~ »~ is 38 35 93 14 76 Existing Use Map Owner. Jameschrist Corporation Case: FLD200b-03016 Sites: 520 Drew Street Property 0.719 Size Acres Atlas 2776 Pa e: PINS: 09/29/15/44352/005/0010 09/29/15/44352/005/0030 S:\Planning Deportment\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending coves\Up for the next DRCVvIoy 4, 2006 DRC\Drew St 520 Drew Street Shops (D-OB) JVS\mops\Map Request Form.doc • 1 a03 2 am ~ b ~ b 0 m ao1 s21 HART ST 31a 0 3f 1 ~ ~ ~ o S `O ~ ~ CBD o p 308 ~ ~ ~8 317 CBD 307 ~' CBD ~5 2 CBD 30„ N C1p JONES 3T A ~~~ ~ a ~ Qea ~ Q ~5 CBD CBD CB 235 221 201 B 205 CAD ~ DREW ST 12 2 135 W CBD 133 ~ ~ °~ 123 f 1v W CBD 121 i 123 t21 ~ 1 1 3g ~ 119 115 ,Z 115 CBD W 111 10~ y 105 p ~ CBD 101 101 HENDERICKS S "CBD N a3 ~ ~ ~ CBD CBD Future Land Use Map Owner. Jameschrist Corporation Case: FLD2006-03016 Sites: 520 Drew Street Property 0.719 Size Acres Atlas 2776 Pa e: PINS: 09/29/15/44352/005!0010 09/29/15/44352/005/0030 S_\Pianning Department\C D 8\FLEX (FLDJ\Pending cases\Up-for the next DRC\May 4, 2006 DRC\Drew St 520 Drew Street Shops (D-OB) JVS\maps\Map Request Form.doc r~ ~°~ _~ ~~~ ~ CARLTON aI(~y~ Q-g ~a Q O ~_ ~ ~ RU TAN g 5~ ST ENGMAN p R ~! ~^ ^ /////~~\\~///// ~ ST o Z p~M O LA SALLE BLUFF Si W2 PALM BLVFF SF EN s+<nc g z Y V < PALM 6LUFF yi ~ g ~ ~ ^ ~ Z CE44R O ST O ~ ~ MEeO d ~ a~ ~ w¢t~ ~ u N PALMETTO S ~SON S' _ Q ^a^ N101QSON O ~ ~ oD~~ ^ aia~~ TT i FlnRDr = sr j ^ ~ ®7 ~ ~E ~~-_I f ~ EIDRDC~ MAfl.E y~ O M LEE Sf <~ ~ PROJECT S/TE < GEORGIA ~ „ART ~ a CD ^ ~ m ^c~ ^ ~ a ¢ ,~~~, < ~ 3 ~~ ®^o~ao^ DREW ST ^~ so~o HFNDRIGCS ~ a ~ rc ^ l.~J < GROVC~ 5T ~ ~n ~ a~.DoO<~ O ~ 0 M.E. 0 ^~ ~~ $$^ ^ ^~~ QEVELAND ST ^ ~ ^ P a ~ 3 ~ ¢^ ^ ~ ~ PIERCE 0 ~ SK ~ < P PERCE Sf PIERCE s ~~^ ~^ ^ ^ ~ z ~ ~ 4q, < ~Ka ~ ~ ~ RT ST a ^ ~ o C~ ~n.~~n -. f SR RO g ~ W ~^ ^ T~ ^ ^ ~ a , O ^ SANTA RD BROWNELL Sf T CHESTNUT ET S.R. BO ROGER Q Q ^ ~ <^ ROG.RS ~ ^ R ~ O COURT Sf SD ROGERS D ~ ~ TURNE o~ o _ 3 ~ o RA¢ ~ ST PINE r~ ~ PINE Sf ~5 "•rE Pexn PHE PRA n ~0'~ ^ $$ 5 a^O EQ 3 ~ ~ w ~^ z `r PINE 2 5 u 'a _ ORU6~ RD W DRVD RD coo ^^^ Z WAY MBM NE WAY 5 ,yL RRK V OP Location Map Owner. Jameschrist Corporation Case: FLD2006-03016 Sites: 520 Drew Street Property 0.719 Size Acres Atlas 2776 Pa e: PINS: 09/29/15/44352/005/0010 09/29/15/44352/005/0030 S:\Plannrng Department\C D B\FLEX (FLDJ\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\May 4, 2006 DRC\Orew St 520 Drew Sfreet Shops (D-OBJ JVS\maps\Map Request form.doc i ~ 309 7 304 300 200 301 °o ~ a a 128 900 38 36 Q J W V h ~. ~ 128 123 126 121 118 1 46 44 42 m ~ d ~ g ss 32 ,~,~ 305 30T 315 30.5 372 301 300 370 c .o ~ ~ A ~ ~ JONES ST 225 ~ 235 Q 2 Q y 201 205 0 0 Q h '~ 200 ~" DREW ST O __ 2 ,~ 127 123 121 119 115 111 107 105 101 Q 374 (/ ~/ 0 ~ ~ 200 ~ ~ 133 Q W 115 Q Z 109 0 HEIR 47 ,~ 45 43 ~ ~ 46 35 35 33 LAURA ST 31 z8 ~~~ 21 m m ~ ~ gg LAURA ST Zoning Map Owner. Jameschrist Corporation Case: FLD2006-03016 Sites: 520 Drew Street Property 0.719 Size Acres Atlas 2778 Pa e: PINS: 09/29/15/44352/005/0010 09/29/15/44352/005/0030 Deportment\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next DRCVviay4, 2006 DRC\Drew St 520 Drew Street Shops fD-OB) JVS\maps\Map Request Form.doc Large Tree located in the northeast corner of the subject property A utility box located in the ROW near the proposed entrances of the building. Way finding signage located in area of proposed building. 200 North Garden Avenue -adjacent office building located to the east. Building has a 5-6 foot front setback from Drew Street and is single story. 200 North Garden Avenue -west side of building facing proposed east parking lot area on subject property. 200 North Garden Avenue -west side of building facing proposed east parking lot area on subject property. Proposed east parking lot area on subject property. Considerable debris is spread over the entire property, including bottles, cans, paper, and a car stop. 200 North Garden Avenue -north side of building facing alleyway. L =~ -~ 225 North Fort Harrison Avenue located north of subject property across alleyway Vandalism located on perimeter wall of 225 North Fort Harrison Avenue. Alleyway located north of subject property. Subject Property 520 Drew Street - Fence and Trees between Checkers and vacant portion of the property. Subject Property 520 Drew Street - Fence and Trees between Checkers and vacant portion of the property Subject Property 520 Drew Street - Fence and Trees between Checkers and vacant portion of the property Dumpsters located to the rear of the subject property. Dumpsters located to the rear of the subject property. Alleyway located north of subject property. Existing Checkers Restaurant to remain on existing site. Illegal push in signage viewed from adjacent property to the north. Existing Checkers Restaurant to remain on existing site. ~.~~ Western property line of subject property. Landscaping appears to be thin. Southwest corner of subject property - Signage and landscaping appear to be in conflict at this corner. Existing Checkers Restaurant to remain on existing site. Existing Checkers Restaurant parking. Existing Checkers Restaurant parking. Non-conforming freestanding sign. Southern property line of Checkers - landscaping appears to be well maintained. Southern property line of Checkers - landscaping appears to be well maintained. Clearwater Garden Towers parking lot located south of the subject property. Clearwater Garden Towers parking lot located south of the subject property. Clearwater Garden Towers parking lot located south of the subject property. 127 North Garden Avenue -Office building located southeast of the subject property. Also a single story building. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Existing Monument and Directional Signs to Remain MAi? 2 ~ 206 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEQRWATER ~ • 10.25 am Case Number: FLD2006-03016 -- 520 DREW ST ~• Owner(s): Jameschris Corp 431 Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, F] 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Fowler & Assoc 1421 Court St Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-449-2021, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: fowlerarch@aol.com Location: 0.717 acres located at the northwest corner of Drew Street and North Fort Harrison Avenue. Atlas Page: 277B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development approval for a mixed use project with an existing 514 square foot restaurant (Checkers), 3,133 square feet of new retail sales, and nine residential apartment units to be located in the Downtown Old Bay district including an additional 9.33 feet for elevator equipment (from roof deck) and a building within a required sight visibility triangle along Drew Street, as a Comprehensive In£11 Development Project, per Section 2-903.C. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 1828 Venetian Point Drive TELEPHONE: 461-0564, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: southern@tampabay.rr.com Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner II Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , .Prior to CDB: 1. In accordance with Community Development,Code Section 4-202, show all existing and proposed utilities. 2. Additional comments may result from submittal of requested information. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense (City Ordinance 7573-06). If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Environmental: 1 , See Stormwater Conditions. Fire: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, May 4, 2006 -Page 10 1 . Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 2 , An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB. 3 , Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300' of building as hose lays and on same side of street as building. PRIOR TO CDB 4 . FDC is required, and shall be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve. PRIOR TO CDB 5 , Afire sprinkler system in accordance with 2002 NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB 6 , Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 7 , Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Required Standpipe Systems shall be in place before construction can proceed to the next level. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB g , Fire Alarm System in accordance with NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 shall be installed, acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 9 , PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 , The tree survey is incomplete. All trees 4"DBH and greater must be shown on all plan sheets prior to CDB. 2 , Civil drawings required; additional comments will be forthcoming once this data is received and reviewed. Note, utility locations and proposed grades will be scmtinized, suggest that the design accommodate the trees to be preserved. Submit prior to CDB. 3 . The tree barricade detail does not meet city standards. Revise prior to building permit. 4 , Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 , Revise landscaping along the north property line to be installed on the subject property and not in the alley. 2 , ADA access way to Fort Harrison Avenue is not shown in the Landscape plan. Revise. Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stormwater: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, May 4, 2006 -Page 11 1 . The addition of parking stops will prevent vehicles from overhanging the five foot sidewalk. 2 . Provide a copy of the Unity of Title prior to Development Order . 3 . Provide additional details for the dumpster enclosure. Materials, Design, Color, Type of Gate. 4 . Indicate on the site plan the location of al] utility (elec, water, gas meters) and mechanical equiptment. Staff also recommends placing a general note on the plans. example: "The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately." 5 . Clarify if the thought of hurrican shutters have been considered for this property. The downtown guidelines state that hurrican shutters, if provided, are fitted as an integral part of the design, not visible when not in use and only to be used during the timeframe in which a formally issued hurrican warning is in effect. 6 . Clarify on the plans the type of fabric/material to be utilized on the awnings. The downtown guidelines state awnings made of high gloss fabrics which appear to be plastic are inappropriate. 7 . Add detailed drawings of the architectural features (the doors, windows, exterior lighting, signage, decorative balcony railings, and cornices) including color, material and other fine details to the plans. 8 . Clarify if any site lighting is proposed. 9 . That address numerals unobtrusive in location and in scale with other design elements on the building facade be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10 . How are gutters and/or downspouts to be handled? If they are not external to the building facade provide a note to plans indicating how they will be handled. I 1 . Are awnings to be backlit? If not, please note on the plans awnings to not be backlit. 12 . What type of glass is to be installed on the ground floor? The downtown guidelines state clear glass (88 percent light transmission or the maximum permitted by any applicable building codes) installed on ground floor windows except for stained or art glass provided the stained or art glass is in character with the style of the building and/or use (churches, craftsman buildings, etc.). 13 . Have signs on the side and rear entrances been considered? 14 . The revised site plan and site data table submitted for completeness (04/10/06) lost one parking space. 32 down to 31. Revise request or the site plan and site data table. I S . The building height is measured from existing grade. The building elevations indicate the height measured from "GR. FLOOR". Clarify. 16 . When parapet walls are utilized they are limited to 30 inches over the maximum height specified (40 feet), even when proposed to screen mechanical equipment. **Staff is confident that an acceptable alternative can be produced that we can stand behind. Provide a roofing plan with any proposed alternatives. 17 . The proposed building elevation indicate EIFS over masonry. This does not comply with the downtown design guidelines. EIFS -Exterior Insulated Finish System materials used on the first three floors of a building exterior are considered inappropriate. Staff feels that the use of a more durable material within the first three floors of all the building would be something we could stand behind. ie: wood, stucco, and/or masonry. 18 . What is proposed of the existing six foot tall wood fence located between the two lots? 19 . The minimum depth of a 90 degree parking space has recently been reduced from 19 to 18 feet. Staff would like to see the utilization of this change to shorten the parking spaces east of the proposed building to obtain a five foot wide landscape, Swale area 20 . All three parking lots are adjacent to rights of way and are required to be screened with either a landscaped buffer or a solid wall or fence three feet in height. 21 . The landscaping between the north drive through lane and the alley needs to be increased to minimize negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views. You have demonstrated this with the parking lot and the adjacent building to the east. Good job. 22 . Show all freestanding signs located on the property and in the street right of way on the site and landscape plans. The master streetscape plan required enhanced levels of landscaping and identification signage on both Fort Hamsona Avenue (Downtown Corridor) and Drew Street (Commercial A). 23 . Downtown Comdor streetscape treatments (Downtown Design Guidelines pgs 159-177) specifies a significantly high level of streetscape treatment for this street because of their function as the major pedestrian streets within the Downtown. Improvements include a variety of paving materials, medians, palm and oak trees, decorative lighting fixtures that can support banners and hanging plants, a fountain plaza and wrought iron style street furnishings. The plan includes the placement of finials, ums, and other street furniture throughout the area ro provide an interesting pedestrian experience. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, May 4, 2006 -Page 13 24 . Commercial A streetscape treatments (Downtown Design Guidelines pgs 160, 182-I 86) specifies that date palms will line the steets with oaks located landscape island in the center of the street where right of way widths permit. Street furnishings, decorative lights and pavers are also included in this design. These streets are more vehicular than pedestrian oriented. 25 . Incorporation of decorative pavers on both sites especially where pedestrian and vehicular paths intersect is required. These improvements are considered appropriate by the Downtown Design Notes: Guidelines. 26 . Provide photographs and sizes of all signs located on the Checkers site. Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda -Thursday, May 4, 2006 -Page 14 FLD2006-03016 520 Drew Street 4/4/2006 FLD2006-03016 520 Drew Street 4/4/2006 Large Tree located in the northeast comer of the subject properly A utilih- bow located in the ROW near the proposed entrances of the building. Way finding siguage located in area of proposed building. 200 North Garden At-enue -adjacent office building located to the east. Building has a 5-6 foot front setback from Drew Street and is single stop. 200 North Garden Avenue -west side of building facing proposed east parking lot area on subject propem-. 200 North Garden Avenue -west side of buildug facuig proposed east parking lot area on subject propert}-. Proposed east parking lot area on subject propem . 127 North Garden Avenue -Office building located southeast of the subject propem~. Also a single story building. Clearn-ater Garden Towers parking lot located south of the subject property. Clearwater Garden To«-ers parking lot located south of the subject propem-. Clearnrater Garden Towers parking lot located south of the subject propem . 133 North Fort Harrison Avenue - Office building located to the south of the subject site. 200 North Garden Avenue -north side of building facing alle~-~~~ay. Considerable debris is spread over the entire property, including bottles, cans, paper, and a car stop. Parking lot located north of 200 North Garden Avenue and alle~rn~av. Vandalism located on perimeter ~~-all of 225 North Fort Harrison Avenue. Alle~wae located north of subject property. -_~~ ,~ ~ r F Qiifa 1C:" - t 225 North Fort Harrison Avenue located north of sabiect propem- across alle~wav. Subject Property 520 Drew Street - Fence and Trees behveen Checbers and vacant portion of the property. 5 Subject Property 520 Drew Street - Fence and Trees belveen Checkers and vacant portion of the property Dumpsters located to the rear of the subject property. Subject Properly 520 Drew Street - Fence and Trees behveen Checkers and vacant portion of the property Duuipsters located to the rear of the subject property. Alle«~-a~- located north of subject propem~. Illegal push ui signage ~~iewed from adjacent propem~ to the north. Existing Checkers Restaurant to remain on existing site.. Existing Checkers Restaurant to remain on existing site. Western property line of s<ibject property. Landscaping appears to be thin. Existing Checkers Restaurant to remaui on existing site. Southwest corner of subject propern- - Signage and landscaping appear to be iu conflict at this corner. Existing Checkers Restaurant parking. Existing Checkers Restaurant parking. Southeru property lice of Checkers - landscaping appears to be ~~°ell maintained. Nou-couforuuug freestaudiug sign. Southeru propem- lute of Checkers - laudscapiug appears to be n-ell maintained. . 6, ~ , P:~ ~.' a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~-- _ . s f .~ ~ :,f";; t _ +r ,, x • I E ' I~~i ~~~ . ~ ~. ~ ~~ , ~. j _ _ j r i . .t df ' ~# y'~I ~l ` mo I ' j ~ r ~ t., ~ ~' ,4 ~~s ~ ~ ,.. • f t f~ • 4 ~; ~ .. f ~-,~jT~ •, ' _ u! ._ _ .~ _ _ ~ F• ~ ~ Kr ~ ..~ Y ~J _ ! ~ ~ _ ,~ ~ r. ~ i i ~ ~ ~ - J' ~' fi~ _ r_, ! - t ~ _ ~ ' p1~ls~ ~ __ ~ ~3J ~ ~.; s ~`4 i ~ ~i.l ~ y ~_. .get. ~ .M. ",~ '2. ~ I!q ~ ' ~ ~~ a E'J , _' ~C:~~ ~t '~ . ~, ~ • ~ ' ~.~i fj ~ ~ 2f`• ,. f~. ~~ ~' R ' X ~'~ ~ Jf __... ~~ _" ma` .rte' _ ~ •JJ , ` r \r p ~' Aerial Map Owner. Jameschrist Corporation Case: FLD2006-03016 Sites: 520 Drew Street Property 0.719 Size Acres Atlas 2776 Pa e: PINS: 09/29/15/44352/005/0010 09/29/15/44352!005/0030 S:\Planning Department\C D 8\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next DRCVviay 4, 2006 DRC\Drew St 520 Drew Street Shops (D-0BJ JVS\maps\Map Request Form.doc to ~ '~3 2 ~ 5 '~ T 40f 9 g ~ ~ ~ m m ~ 90 „ 400 4014 3 a HART ST 333 ~ 314 312 311 31 ~ 32i 2 n $ ~ 310 0 0 m m c N 3 8 7 308 309 `O ° M 308 317 g 6 & T 6 5 ~,> 3~ 305 307 O n , 10 e 304 9 301 2 305 302 1 2 3 3 N tO ~ 301 2 3 a 53~ 44352 07940 300 , 2 n Q °^° ~ ~ °a c w 443mi~.i ~ h ~[! b +q ~ m 4a3s2 JONES ST e~~. ~ w A 01 ~" ," l q Q 0 Q Q R a `N R w Q 2~ Q Q Q ~ u PnW a PKT. s 28s a T 2 T ~ 37890 a21 , , Q s 2 PKL ~ zn1 2 3 s OFC 3 o O z + 200 g + °° 3 e' t/! 0 o a a 2 m o m ~ = DREW ST 128 a ,~ ~ I I s T 133 , ~ ~ PKi, ix3 i2 ~ , OFC PKL OFC 17 ,0 9 s T s +~+ ~ 123 i 122 „m, 3 i ~ i ,Loa 118 ~ ,0 5 120 ~ 7 38 2 Q 4 1 O Q J W i~ 3 . 2 s 3s ~ s 59580 H ,am ~ 1 ig1 4 ~ Q ~ 101 7 1.72 Z '~ Z s HENDERICK T 47 ,~ ,s 21 20 19 78 44 42 ~ ~ a 3 33 ,7~ ,5 g w ~ 38 35 13 14 ,s ~ Existing Use Map Owner. Jameschrist Corporation Case: FLD2006-03016 Sites: 520 Drew Street Property 0.719 Size Acres Atlas 277B Pa e: PINS: 09/29/15/443521005/0010 09/29/15/44352/005/0030 S:\Pianning Department\C D B\FlEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next ORC\May 4, 2006 DRC\Drew St 520 Drew Street Shops (D-OB) JVS\maps\Map Request Forrn.doc 2 403 2 401 a mo c ~ ~o 401 321 ^ HART ST ` 314 0 311 0 o ~ 0 ~' ~' a o ~ m '° V CBD ~ ~ 309 3oe 31~ CBD ~~ 3~ CBD 3~ 2 CBD 301 CBS, N N ~ ~ CBS JONES ST d n a a~~~ a ° ° ~5 CBD CBD Q CB ?35 221 201 205 200 Q ° B CBD ~ DREW ST 2 W 12 135 Q CBD 133 ~ `~ 123 ~ 12~ W CBD 123 121 D ~ 1 1 3B f21 1 ~ 119 115 (' Z 115 CBD W ~~' y 105 Q 101 1 1 2 CBD HENDERICK S 45 47 "CBD ~ ~ N ~ ~ CBD CBD Future Land Use Map Owner. Jameschrist Corpora#ion Case: FLD2006-03016 Sites: 520 Drew Street Property 0.719 Size Acres Atlas 2778 Pa e: PINS: 09/29/15/44352/005/0010 09/29/15/44352/005/0030 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLDJ\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\May 4, 2006 DRC\Drew St 520 Drew Street Shops (D-OB) JVS\maps\Map Request Form.doc ~~ ~ ¢~ ~ f CARLTON ~ ~ ~ % ENG~ QAE ~~Qa `-TANGER N_-'E 1 ~ ST ENGNAN ST ///~ ~ - ¢ ~~ ~O D ~ ~ D USALLE p Y Y G Pk0.I p ~~T ST P%61 ELUFF SI 2 P%M BLUFF SE ~ Ij p i ~" Q ~ j SPNT,~ ~ JURCFNS ST ~ AlETTO ~ ~ o O ~ CETNR ST E ~J aD D Awctso^ ~ o PALUETTO 5 N ~~D~ON ~ NlcNasoN sr NIwDLSON o D D ^ ~ Q ~ ~' ~ ~DDDD^~0~~ RI DRUr z sr {F D ~ ~ RIPPLE ELDRD3E 2 I Li®a D AMPLE ~ MAP! E ~ a~ Q LEE Sr O 1 FlA A ST < PROJECT GEORGU\ ~ NARTa ST ~ ~ 14CKSONa ¢ S/TE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 s ~ ~ ~ ®^owaoo 8~ O oa ~~~~ ~ ~y~~ao~~ o . ¢ ~ ¢ k NFNORK:K~'1 ^ ~ ~ ~" ~ uw. I~\ > ~AURp I t~._/W CJ2fNF y-r z II~ ~'I 8 dG ~ ~;~ L~J ^ ~ ~ m~ NF. p o~o 4EVELAND ST ~a~~ ^~~a sT ~`~< ^ P PfERCE ST f('~' ~ PIERCE 5T PIERCE ZO ~ ~u ~ ^ ~ (IIII ~IIII ¢ FRANIQN Sf ¢ ~ ~Oy I ' u RT 5T D ~ ^ ~ ..... ~.~ .-. CYI C R fi0 COURT g ~ 3 ('~1 1~ NUiIUEY~ ^ ~ ~ w L~.~J ~ .~ S4N7A RO BROWNELL Sf , 11 "~"'~ 0 0 J 1 CHESTNUT ST S.R.80 COURT SI S p g~ ROGER~Q ^ ~Qa ROGERS ~ ^ ~ C ROGERS TURNER gL D 3 - a ~~8 P...n ~ HViOU) ~ a PINE R ~ w tr Rn,.. O PINE PR~'E ST EQ 3T I ' u ~ ~ as ~ € I~ry S PINE Z S O p S ~ ~ ~ ~ y g DRUD RD ~ W DRUID RD f l ao oao NSMWE - WAY 14SM NE WAY 9 ,W GNIIIF ORK v ~- Location Map Owner. Jameschrist Corporation Case: FLD2006-03016 Sites: 520 Drew Street Property 0.719 Size Acres Atlas 2776 Pa e: PINS: 09/29/15/44352!005/0010 09/29/15/44352/005/0030 S:\Pianning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\May4, 2006 DRC\Drew St 520 Drew Street Shops (D-OB) JVS\maps\Map Request Form.doc 3os 7 304 300 200 301 o~ o a 128 100 38 W 36 Q J W V 2 a 128 f23 128 121 118 1 46 44 42 ~ ~ ~ LAURA ST .. 305 3b7 315 305 302 301 300 900 h ~ f~ A $ JONES ST 225 ~ b 235 Q Z y 201 205 a' o N Q ~ ~ 200 2 ~' DREW ST O Z 135 127 123 121 119 115 111 107 105 101 zs zz /~ 304 {/ V ~ ~ 200 ~1 i ~ 133 Q W 115 Q Z 101 ~ HE11 47 ~ 43 43 ~ ~ 48 35 35 33 31 ~ 27 z1 ~~ m m ~ ~ ~~ LAURA ST Zoning Mop Owner. Jameschrist Corporation Case: FLD2006-03016 Sites: 520 Drew Street Property 0.719 Size Acres Atlas 277B Pa e: PINS: 09/29/15/44352/005/0010 09/29/15/44352/005/0030 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next DRCVvlay4, 2006 DRC\Drew St 520 Drew Street Shops (D-OB) JVS\maps\Map Request Form.doc i~l'N'7'arirys= "~~~~~'~~'~~ Conditions Associated Wit ~~ ~~' ,~ ~;~. ~' FLD2006-03016 =~, a ~:_ `~~,,,=~,,,~'~k+ 520 DREW ST '~-~~y Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4773 04/20/2006 Prior to CDB: Not Met 1. In accordance with Community Development Code Section 4-202, show all existing and proposed utilities. 2. Additional comments may result from submittal of requested information. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense (City Ordinance 7573-06). If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Environmental Condition Heather Faessle 562-4897 04/18/2006 see stormwater conditions Not Met Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 04/11/2006 Revise landscaping along the north property line to be installed on the subject property and not in Not Met the alley. 04/11/2006 ADA access way to Fort Harrison Avenue is not shown in the Landscape plan. Revise. Not Met Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 04/14/2006 Prior to CDB: Not Met 1) The site plan is to be signed and sealed by an Engineer with existing and proposed elevations on site and 50 foot adjacent to the site in all directions. 2) Provide a cross section of the proposed swale and calculations to show that the City water quality volume can be adequately provided in this area. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) The applicant is to provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 2) Provide impervious area calaulations for the existing and proposed site so that the payment-in-lieu of retention requirement can be paid by the developer. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 04/20/2006 Sight distance triangles incorrectly placed. It must be drawn from the edge of property line. Not Met 2. Since the existing restaurant and proposed retail/residential share the same lot, they should share the same driveway along Drew Street to comply with City's access managment standards (Community Development Code section 3-102). 3. Demonstrate how a parked scaled passenger car 18' in length can exit the end most parking stalls. 4. Provide wheelstops in parking spaces that abut sidewalk. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be Print Date: 04/21/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 3 FLD2006-03016 520 DREW ST Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.. Zoning Condition John Schodtler • 562-4775 727-562-4547 04/06/2006 The addition of parking stops will prevent vehicles from overhanging the five foot sidewalk. Not Met 04/06/2006 Provide a copy of the Unity of Title prior to Development Order . Not Met 04/06/2006 Provide additional details for the dumpster enclosure. Materials, Design, Color, Type of Gate. Not Met 04/06/2006 Indicate on the site plan the location of all utility (elec, water, gas meters) and mechanical Not Met equiptment. Staff also recommends placing a general note on the plans. example: "The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately." 04/06/2006 Clarify if the thought of hurrican shutters have been considered for this property. The downtown Not Met guidelines state that hurrican shutters, if provided, are fitted as an integral part of the design, not visible when not in use and only to be used during the timeframe in which a formally issued hurrican warning is in effect. 04/06/2006 Clarify on the plans the type of fabric/material to be utilized on the awnings. The downtown Not Met guidelines state awnings made of high gloss fabrics which appear to be plastic are inappropriate. 04/06/2006 Add detailed drawings of the architectural features (the doors, windows, exterior lighting, signage, Not Met decorative balcony railings, and cornices) including color, material and other fine details to the plans. 04/06/2006 Clarify if any site lighting is proposed. Not Met 04/06/2006 That address numerals unobtrusive in location and in scale with other design elements on the Not Met building facade be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit. 04/06/2006 How are gutters and/or downspouts to be handled? If they are not external to the building facade Not Met provide a note to plans indicating how they will be handled. 04/06/2006 Are awnings to be backlit? If not, please note on the plans awnings to not be backlit. Not Met 04/06/2006 What type of glass is to be installed on the ground floor? The downtown guidelines state clear Not Met glass (88 percent light transmission or the maximum permitted by any applicable building codes) installed on ground floor windows except for stained or art glass provided the stained or art glass is in character with the style of the building and/or use (churches, craftsman buildings, etc.). 04/06/2006 Have signs on the side and rear entrances been considered? Not Met 04/10/2006 The revised site plan and site data table submitted for completeness (04/10/06) lost one parking Not Met space. 32 down to 31. Revise request or the site plan and site data table. 04/10/2006 The building height is measured from existing grade. The building elevations indicate the height Not Met measured from "GR. FLOOR". Clarify. 04/10/2006 When parapet walls are utilized they are limited to 30 inches over the maximum height specified Not Met (40 feet), even when proposed to screen mechanical equipment. "*Staff is confident that an acceptable alternative can be produced that we can stand behind. Provide a roofing plan with any proposed alternatives. 04/11/2006 The proposed building elevation indicate EIFS over masonry. This does not comply with the Not Met downtown design guidelines. EIFS -Exterior Insulated Finish System materials used on the first three floors of a building exterior are considered inappropriate. Staff feels that the use of a more Print Date: 04/21/2006 CaseConditons Page 2 of 3 • FLD2006-03016 520 DREW ST Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 durable material within the first three floors of all the building would be something we could stand behind. ie: wood, stucco, and/or masonry. 04/11/2006 What is proposed of the existing six foot tall wood fence located between the two lots? Not Met 04/11/2006 The minimum depth of a 90 degree parking space has recently been reduced from 19 to 18 feet. Not Met Staff would like to see the utilization of this change to shorten the parking spaces east of the proposed building to obtain a five foot wide landscape, swale area 04/11/2006 All three parking lots are adjacent to rights of way and are required to be screened with either a Not Met landscaped buffer or a solid wall or fence three feet in height. 04/11/2006 The landscaping between the north drive through lane and the alley needs to be increased to Not Met minimize negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views. You have demonstrated this with the parking lot and the adjacent building to the east. Good job. 04/11/2006 Show all freestanding signs located on the property and in the street right of way on the site and Not Met landscape plans. The master streetscape plan required enhanced levels of landscaping and identification signage on both Fort Harrisona Avenue (Downtown Corridor) and Drew Street (Commercial A). 04/11/2006 Downtown Corridor streetscape treatments (Downtown Design Guidelines pgs 159-177) specifies Not Met a significantly high level of streetscape treatment for this street because of their function as the major pedestrian streets within the Downtown. Improvements include a variety of paving materials, medians, palm and oak trees, decorative lighting fixtures that can support banners and hanging plants, a fountain plaza and wrought iron style street furnishings. The plan includes the placement of finials, urns, and other street furniture throughout the area ro provide an interesting pedestrian experience. 04/11/2006 Commercial A streetscape treatments (Downtown Design Guidelines pgs 160, 182-186) specifies Not Met that date palms will line the steets with oaks located landscape island in the center of the street where right of way widths permit. Street furnishings, decorative lights and pavers are also included in this design. These streets are more vehicular than pedestrian oriented. 04/21/2006 Incorporation of decorative pavers on both sites especially where pedestrian and vehicular paths Not Met intersect is required. These improvements are considered appropriate by the Downtown Design Guidelines. 04/21/2006 Provide photographs and sizes of all signs located on the Checkers site. Not Met Print Date: 04/21/2006 CaseConditons Page 3 of 3 John Schodtler 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 (727)562-4547 i ohn.schodtler(a~myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida January 2006 to present Performed technical review and preparation of staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, Flexible Standard and Flexible Development cases (variances and conditional uses). Made presentations to various City Boards. Created custom Crystal reports for the planning department. • Planner I City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida March 2005 to January 2006 Duties consisted of assisting customers with basic zoning and planning related issues. Performed technical review and preparation of staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, Flexible Standard and Flexible Development cases (variances and conditional uses). Made presentations to various City Boards. Created custom Crystal reports for the planning department. • Development Review Specialist/Associate Planner City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 1998 to March 2005 Assisted customers with basic zoning and planning related issues. Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for Flexible Standard cases (variances & conditional uses). Created custom Crystal reports for the planning department. Computer Systems Administrator. Maintained the department computers, software and networking systems and trouble shooting difficulties at the departmental level and acting as liaison to the Information Technologies Department for larger scale problems. • Customer Service Representative City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 1996 to August 1998 Duties consisted of assisting, directing and informing customers with occupational licenses and building permits. Additional duties involve greeting customers, reviewing building plans, accounting and general data entry. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Business Management, Minor in Human Development, Eckerd College, 2006 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board -June 20, 2006 FLD2006-03016 -Page l4 Map Output • . Page 1 of 1 ua ~ • ~a 0 a - r . * ~ '~,. ,t~7tr ~Ra~ • 1 http://msb-gis-int/servlet/com. esri. esrimap.Esrimap? ServiceName=OVMap&ClientVersion... 4/4/2006 Map Output ~ • Page 1 of 1 520 Drew Street ^ + + ~ • SEhtlNt}LE f ` + + ~ LMDR • + • ~Q • • . _ . • . • ~xu + IL TlIJ C3S1R d K w~TER i ca • r • ~ I' / • • CE3D t • ~ • ~ + • ra ~ • • ~~ RIEfi~G@ • • ~~ Rnt + ' ...~ + • • HA(YT BART uJ HAfdT • t + ~ + ~ ~ + JON€S t ~ + • • ~ ^ +• • ^ • ~~ • • ~ D t a ~i ^ . ~ I~fOCs s QREW • ^ • • W • ~ ~~ ^ ~ WEN!lERICICS ^ +~ ~ • • • a q f~ ^ ^ LAURAt ~ ~ • • • (w S • - • • * ~, + • • s+ ~s + • http://msb-gis-int/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap? ServiceName=OVMap&ClientVersion... 4/4/2006 Map Output ~ ~ Page 1 of 1 ~ ~ ~'' ~ '? ~'a~. * i~ V • ~~ ~ ,j -~_ - -- ~ tq~ F :~ `~ .4 _ ~ t .I,.~ .'~._ r,. ~' ~1~ .. _ ,_. i ~` ,... f a __. i ~. ~. +~~ ~ -- -. ~;- - -- 34 ~ #, 1 m r, ~ ~ k w l ~ ,,,~ .„ ~ _, ~~ ~ t, Y~ #: • .~ • ' .% ~` s "~ «. Yr ~ k t g ~- ~~~ L *t F S ;' a '.: ~~~ ~.;~ ^ ~ C z ~ ,; _ e ~ ~~ _. _ a j a~=` ~. ~ A ~. _f -- ~ 3 .~ ~. http://msb-gis-intlservletJcom.esri. esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=OVMap&ClientVersion... 4/4!2006 B O UND,~ R Y SUS VE Y ADDRESS: X DREW STREET CLEAR TER, FLORIDA. SCALE: 7 " = 20' DETAIL A SAN. M.H. OCCUPIES o, CONCRETE ~ CORNER o OVERLAPS v S.BR 6547 F!P 1/2'~ Tl. ~ wlTNrss G~ CORNER , O FlP 3/4" ~ ~ G G dG~ ~ ' ~ OVERLAI'53.s I~~ 6~ ~-C I 16' PLATTED ALLEY I~ ' ' ~ oo i 140.09 (M)) SAN, M,H. EAST 11 D.DD'(M) 100.02' M) ~ 00 ~~ I 140.00' M OCCUA/E5 1 f00 00'f TM ' . f0.00 (TM) ) I Ddb -- CORNER FN/D~ NW gI17 5/g _ F!P ~2_ _ _ _ SIR 5/8 4 B 6 9 " FlP " 3U Z~ ~ ~D LOT 1 L ~ ~N~M)I ---`-~- L8 6347 COR R A CO . ~y /T/~/ S E S L LOT 5 I NT BLOCK 5 CORNER ~ ~ F/P 1/2 BLOCK 5 ~ - I SEDfT A I I I I LOT 2 I ER ~ I j q0 RE / ; ~ LOT 4 q3 ~ e 3 ~ ~ ESp ~I ~ oc~ y (? e~oc~ 5 ; 4 ~ FE ~ ~ I I _ w ~ IN i ~ N~ I I N~ I o I ~'~ ~ 4i ui I L N I A P,5"~ i ~ N `~ G J~' I °o '~ i °o Z I vi I i I I I I ~ I I o I ' I I 140.42• M) I f I 140.00' TM) !R 1/2" ~ ~r t o I ~e s a ~ ~ x ; FIP r ~ s io.ooi~~ M ~flP 1" ORIGINAL ' ~ 5 CSW RECENED ' I o.7 CONCRETE CURB ~ FR 10 2006 `°~ ' PLANNING DEPARTMEN I DREW STREET FN/D - - 65' R/w - - - CITY OF CLEARWATER lV O TE: This survey was conducted without the benefit of on abstract of title, therefore there may be other easements, right-of-way, setback lines, agreements, reservations, restrictions, or other similar matters o{ public record, not depicted on this survey. A =ARC CH =CHORD EOA = ELTCE OF PAVEMEMFII' =FOUND IRON PJPE MH =MANHOLE PP POWER POLE Q BM =BENCH MARK CLF =CHAIN LINK FENCE EOW = EDCE OF WATER F1R =FOUND IRON ROD pllp =OVERHEAD POWER LINE R = RAO/US Z BRG =BEARING CONC. =CONCRETE FCC =FOUND CROSS CUT FN =FOUND NNL p = pLAT SIP = SEf IRON P/PE W CBS= CONCRETE BLOCK/STUCCOCSW =CONCRETE SIDEWALK FCM =FOUND CONCRETE Fl'p =FOUND PINCH PIPE pC m ppJM OF CURVATURE ~ ' ~ ~N ~ ~N ~' I ~~~ ~ CALC =CALCULATED D =DEED MONUMEM LLF =LOWEST LMNG FLOORpCp a pER~{glyt7yT CONTROL POIM UE = UTJL/iY EASEMENT ~CHB =CHORD BEAR/NG DE = DRAINAGE EASEMEM FH fTRE HYUILIM M = MfASUREMEM P/ a POINT OF INTERSEC110N ~ = N'A7ER BOX WF = W000 FENCE FLOOD INFORMATION: LEGAL: sECnoN: s rowNSHip: 2ss RANGE.• 15E CERTIFIED To: ZONE: X LOT 3 AND 1HE WEST 40 FEET OF LOT 4, BLOCK 5, JONE5 SUBD/VlSON MR. SAFRANAS NUMBER: 125096-0108H OF N/CHOLSONS ADDI]ION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, AS RECORDED IN DREW STREET PROJECT DATE.' 08-17-05 PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 13, ACCORDING TO ]HE PUBLIC RECORDS OF X HlLLS80ROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. X ~ FLORIDA BENCHMARK INC CER TIFI CA TION: I HEREBY C£RT/FY THAT THIS D , . P R OF"ESSI O N A L S U R VE 1'OR SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND MEET5 7NE M/N/MUM 7ECHN/C.AL STANDARDS AS SET FORTH 8Y THE BOARD OF D PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS /N CHAPTER 61G17-6 OF 1298 LAKEV/EW ROAD PH. (727) 298-0286 THE FLOR/DA ADM/N/STRATNE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION CLEARWATER, FL. 33756 FAX (727) 461-0696 472.027 OF THE FLOR/DA STATUTES. NOT VALID WITHOUT SIGNATURE AND EMBOSSED WffH SURVEI'OR SEAL. AUTHORIZATION NO. LB 6947 ~i~ ~ ~ FIELD WORK BY.• JJ/DF MB/JC DATE.• 08-25-05 REVISION DATE.• 1~ PAGE ~ f ~ 2' A . DRAWN BY.• WDB DATE.• 09-14-05 3.• JOB# 05-3041 M. G. MAYER PLS 4495 GATE F-r v ••• -. ~' _---T '~ + N.,~ . _. LAND U5E DATA: NEVI IiIXED tl5E 5(TE )...r. E oailc aoao n Yt4/IYY rwsam la_wc 4~ N/A N/A Ea 6ylrrW EYEiYYY M/A 4wu.r.w~ r" ~ r..,,w. N.L mddn r ro CNAMLE 4e4 ]SO R NO d1A1CE X!A 4rc ~ R NO L11411fE N/A ~1 rq fLrl/w.d W J. /EtJ .Ea Y/A wlereilLL t/•Na [iNY•arn LQ6d •Em E.wr. o + o Iv¢ YYr1YrL Yerrr- rr+ Lr Y EYf [' r P.~ Ir Y EW t' ~. wr N/A ha~ Nlr E) NYEII} f Y Iee~ LL'Y6ly C ~. e.w N/A IYt a NY W Nw Ar I hw... IfN J•IUS Ilfp J.ilff N/A Ys 4rw.l Ar {16 J.•tF l1N EI.• IOf lof h., E!E NOTE hw w rdf Yr1 ^ u u EmaY REOUalD eARgN4 REb1AYRANT: rN N. • 6 YAQ6 /1000 W. • / MACPS RETAL~ 2+11 ff • 1 fFACEf /1000 fl, • 6 6•ACEE REEIOENIIAL Y PACE6 / Ilri. • M VAWf DEN9TT CACULATIONS: PrrW Py. Ar Rra 6Ak OS • Nw! rrYW Irn 3.%i J. • 4 a nrd Y girl enriW we L+11 J. w..I..wa~.~r,r.u.fLTMd.•x+n~.•oank N.rr ~.IP a efA . ofse+ k • o w NON-RESIDENTIAL AREA : 3,ti81 5.F NEW APAP,TMENT UNITS : 9 LANDSCAPE PLAN arv Na IIARi MATt1UAl ECYEOa.E EOTANCN NME aY)IN1011 NANe Y[C7ICATINN r¢E aalr SOD: ST. AUGUSTNiE 'FL.ORfTAN' rr w C IaEA SEA IiEA EAW NKT,NOL /4L 10 w rrialmfEi ~. rNN1AmaNEE na1mA a r oc I rx N EA pWIEIG iN aNaE M1OImA YIr OG IfK E n aElalriasam amaN Naa rAxr.lvaL IfY x YI 1~aD!•Lii Yaalat ROE6I, l Dr04 I G1L T 1'+~~i Q/ r10~. 4 D I D G.r N f a e00aEEEa r. ALYlAr If01DA 41P OL i ul b ~ YABWIEO JA91E IIIU IYA9W181 llylm {~'yy CROfOMCOgA8111 VAf7EGATUI I GAL FLORDA FANCY W 3 GAL. FLODJDA tl IOdN NAiiIpEE SiAflIOI&3 NBCA 1JBIJ 7`'~pt,1PE NYRTIE QAG6tSTR0ENa IQ~CN 3 GAL. H'x u`. FLORIDA 0 3' qA. n BREAST H9G4R, FLA. >h VBRWWii MBRWNII SIISPENSWII 3 GAL, 3G' O.C, FIOP,mA FANCY O IXORA COCflIEA IXORA OL flAIE R DE p00S) I GAL. FLORIDA tl, B' O.C. GENERAL NOTES 1 rir73~.r~1 o I I.e+rY~Z.v r r. W W 2 irew r Y eoWely W eater I. IDOf Yrp Yri TY ~ Y ra Ywirr r Indwwe V W /Yr _ r~f"e,tYW IWwr MenN rwrlW rfW~rw-r I. ~~. 4~ser/.rYrYwWilYrwt Yr~rylY raw rO art Nleleee K w I V W r ~ IG sw / rt 1. oaul rr. r r.ea• r yt r.e lm .Ny mere Y Y wit tree r W rrq Mrr Y r W elw~l nereilYe leant c oaere xioaer. n rYre Y r rlr w M r Y r Ee~e Tie a j4iq. YCeI Y W reeY I Yr w. l N W reYr f W rL I lie r rY err Y Y • r irnl hw W 4 T N I.er /ee r.I~rM.reWr~~ ~ m I W Crtlre I L TE6Nw¢I n aer. Y yr d Yt~.. rr.i y r oo~ v'i were f W uer nlwr Y rl Yi L ~fY treat Yler •r/rYwYN•O1RIYel ^rra rrm.wrr LANDSCAFRIG NOTFS t ri~M IrrM 16et reel Y Y reeM l V'Geb r IWYi T-Need Yd'. MY i 1 L IYi OwrYn I Mrra 1 ~, &A+rVe. ilY tilt eeYNrfrrw Yw11aW yet a ue nil w1 Yliei IesY Eta r Y Y W e 1 Orr e~ 1. DAAI :Y'A'gti~ YbYlYe4/f )eet1re11W t mid NNl+pwleVVmef Y Y.ri/ Ihf r F W~ fek s rd ~rr~ r r+lrr rr .+Yf r Yeyh ...1 Y re .r f eWr Y t1r w+~eerl Y Yn y R• eW YI N l 7NEB~Lr YYyrN• ~r`RYrW ~iryl~irp r reNLL ilrYY /M Iley t, Irw~ eiYarl/Vry elN Ya e.. ed Vb Ire ~ ~N Ii~eR vYL .ewelllr wrd 1. nAETEbN12 N reeer Y Y W neerYl f W eeerear eN eM i- W Y eaewq. 1 ~7~ N Yeti /wr t~ r r Y Y W~l lerr YI ~i•a-f 100'f eae IeWr wr a W re lernr y W wfMr. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS mu mnlY6 Ia7! (Yrw1 CelrLwril N err r wrieey Y aM Y W Yrrr r fNriar reoil e~Y W Mr ~~~Yr~/ eint wl r.rr" .+r W ~I ~. rnr"'"i ti d .a~.~ ~'i~ f ever. r r .nlN w nrr P11-26-01 ~_ ~-~ Irlei Yrr1~ rroo r w'l Yu. owl9 lelr I Yr. lee/1 YNrai 0.~ ~ $~ / ro wE E. tae f ORABIED PARgNL 51Gi DETAIL m /v+L SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL m ILrE IXSABLED PARgNG SPACE DETAILS NofcNE Lr M rr r r'ie iu~ wet ~ r wYre. ER.+•4 eww. reel fee.rn rlr YYr l.r awW 4Y MIr rrr W erel r ever M eelr. /eR 0.7~ 'Ar{r' Orwe mere w Lit' r.r • we~eNr Me. nA pu 0eq~ N erW iuMei W eIr r t e Mr rluw PYes M N r.lwrr rw. tart b. Tp oo-mo ier :19ilF.ri~Iwa•aw n. rrrrvo.sl.u,abo YC IrrrM. PYte NIYR frrlr p, I/Ir11 Ilea aY0 erei r/4 Een irY p IYL AYn rr un lee.l K YLL Rr Ia YM Yrw 6rrW dr. r.~r v. r•w Ern. nw.e.: w Yr.l y ei CrW YIw piei E far a .rrr UORKMANSMP: Ayl~(ar4..r . rrry . Nrl~ Y W ~ r wL r ~ w4 Ile1I DOS rrl~ it Y ~~ wnl~ W~ ah vwrwYrnpprYrrelY Raeiy Er Iwee Nrrr wd.rl rw 4 Ytr Y Y /ae~l ws EVCiem~~ I-f Wf/~lw ~aerrrr. V7 Oi ~ Cy k IYC Yf fi0 v 6. I0p IVC r nn v a No Ivc I Vf IY•b p Cr NO NC I VT b-a v A. ND IYC Ii-Y f iur atil v ~ w I~vc p a=a6r o.folvc Tr ear W wre t W / Clw/~ lr O.rirra Ci W w/•e' w ew wl llr Itr~ Tie. l fre rr er ro rr YYeenirl rr rtYriwerrl M w.o. fY erew pw Y ers r r Y eed Y eeel/ eYe e a Y rrrrl Ya Ilwr enr n r wiY. 2 k/w er~rrL Yr rNn rT Bawl. revel YrrW I~Ylwr relrr.rY yr WwneN er Darr rrarrr.rrsr~~rrlr. Wwarrsrr L Y r•i ~ rYY wl~'errwYer Y~eNrwYM Y ~Y~ Meer wrr.r eve Y een Ilw W hw . N ~ V Y C Ares rrytw p at Y weYl Il w r/Iw eeYlr rrr f n•r.NrrWrrrryrrrerr.r GrinrYw e4r qbr rrl r.EeYrdrr Ae YYYr Yrwrdrr 1. Arranp ertrrY~lrfesrreo•rA iar wwrr W wEre~ qdr Y W ~ilr *Ye rw rwb nail Iw rani ~ OP L' STROKE PAINTED WHITE TREE PLANTING DETAIL AO RYIE z~ W r Q aQ WQ W J ~U OO z Y.•' g~ _._. ._. -sounarlauvu_._._ DREW STREET YO RlLwr-ol~An IYWIt« raReni fan rYegr... SITE :PLAN Extl a r Nr x+ /Y Nr ~~ PNo- anNE a roacnaE aula wrlE LINaE rl ro a eelm EN~'I@I mNNar Era mna:mr NEna Eref rEn it anm -)NeE YE m aw. R R/[! a6 rl IAIt.OxflRm ,~ wrfn ralerf m a!A PROTECiIYE 6ARRIER DETAIL ~~ i~ ~ • • ~4EQ~dIt~.t~It.~.~D~ ~~V ~ ~Z~ ~~t,oP,F ~~M-- ,~~1•~l•~~~ut~u(5 ~~iJ ~~ rr~D aC: 5~~e~vi~J• ~~~ua~ ~1~v53 ''~~l~p ~is~-E.~ - lip - '~;IlJit~~'!"l.I,'~~D'Ib;\Y/aila~l~i i~ ,:~ ~, 3/16" = I'-0" ~~~~~~~ .~o~ --- ~lk~.i~ t~ ~~~ Q,l..J6~5 ~'lvlv22 -- ~c~ pal ~„ _ - C~~e~ ~~~~~~ ~ ___. ~~a~•d~ SKETCH OF 51JRVEY M~ 1.3. 0 Z 111 ~ Z W ~ ~ z w ~ w >: ~ F Z oW W> ~ ~ ~< ~ Had _' n d ~ '~ Sa^ . ~ ti ~ Z Y J a s m tt V z 0 U IJ O a 0 O tt > IU W ~' F N`~ J . nr. 3' .~ • `~~ J~ ,}°, 13.5' P A V E M E N T . ~ 70.28' 0 OI LIGwi POLE ~LOVEREO \ BRICK AREArv I CCNCREIE ,~ DRTVE-iHRU ALLEY NS9' 24' 34' E 25 I 70.26' LIGwi POLE (i'PTCAL) TFr hGy~ 1 39 CANTER i y.U~ 7LANTEF: i 2 2 ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~~t~ b. ~. b BRICK ~ COl~G IAL BRICK I 39.0' 2. Z'~ ~ !!. )' ~ ~ ?! T' PLANiER a, 0• Rl n COVERED CONCRETE I I I AREA DRIVE-THRU W H 0 0 BRiLK ISLAND ~ W DINNING AREA PLANTER w Z 0 ~ I„IC 0 SPACES • 4.3' I I X`` 14.5 I PARCEL I ' A' LOT 1 LOT 2 BLOCK 5 I BLOCK 5 CONCRETE PARKING 1 I I ~ , 10 SPACES • 0.6 X 20 I ~ II II w~ J 0 w ~ J N o ~ rc a wz ~' Y V' ~ ~ uH 2 J W V` ~7 2 H U J a q• cu LIGHT POLE 7O.0 I' ;1O~OL 5' CONCREIE 51DEDALK 4. 3' GREENSPACE LIGwi POLE CATCH 6' CURB BASIN 40' PAVEMENi LIGN1 POLE LOT 3 BLOCK 5 PARCEL 'B' W 1 ~ 4 M U ~ „ n } . w ~~ ~ - W ~ m v ~ = 1 0 V ~' I'. LIGwi DOLE Q^C~~ YPICALI 70.01, ~'~. 5b9' 24' 4 I' W 250.03' 13.5' P AVEMENI ~ I CONCRETE ~h'~ / 70.28' oG c ~ , 44. 9o T~ 4 70.01' 5' CONCRETE SIDEVALK 4. 3' GREEN6PACE 6' LURE 40' PAVEMENT ORE~I STREEI (60' RIGHt-OF-tirAY=l CHECKERS RESTURANT PROPERTY AOORE6S: 20t NORTH #~ARRISON AVENUE REVI$IONS OAAWN gY: .~uH CREH CHIEF. rie'! CHECKED BY: M8F F, g, f I LE SCALE: i' • 25' F I ELO NORK: 09115100 SLEET ! ~ ! JOB N0. 0005: SS DATA f I LE: 0009 i i ~ 25' 0' 25' 50' 15 GRAPHIC SCALE -FEEL LEOAL s"~ESCAIP110N: (S..'ICS.,. 'NNSHIP _.:.. -AnGE 15 EASiI PAACEL'A'.-LOTS !AND 2. BLOCK 5, JOKE'S SUBDIVISION OF NICNOLSDN'S AOOITION TO CLEAANAfEA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECGAOEO IV FLAT BOOK t, PAGE 13, HILLS90AOUGH COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS OF kHICH PIHELLAS CGNTY'dAS FDANEALY A PRAT. PARCEL'S' -LOTS 3 AND d, BLOCK 5. JOKE'S SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSOH'S ADDITION TO CLEAANATEF. ACCOAOING 10 THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN ALAI 300K 1. PAGE 13. HILL:SCP ~'GH COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS DF W91CH PIHELLAS CONTY ;AS FOANEALY A =RAT, _... 'dE EAST 30 FEET OF LDT :. 3LCCK :. ' NONAMMAD B. FAR 8f31 Meadowview Place, New Pori Richey, Florida, ; Phone: (127) 375-1740 Fax: (727) 315-f74i FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP INFOANATIOft CGNNUNITY PANEL NUMBER 125096-0015-0 OATEO: O8/!91!99! THE PROPERTY APPEANS TO 8E IN FLOOD 2DNE 'C' ~ THE BASE 100 YEAH fL000 ELEVATION IS NfA MEAN SEA LEVEL h~0 J1 •\ O~Q 40.26' ^' 30.00'- r=- t. 3" 0.GA ,,^^ Y` Y V m OJ V ~~ W 'Lel ~ h~ O A PORTION OF ` '' o LOT 4 w m BLOCK 5 . ~ ~ r 4 `~ r •N O O ~ a ^ \" W ~ry ~ \ ~ 1.1' CLEAR ~ Q ~ °~ ~ ' 40. o r' E 30.00 CEATIFICATI Ott RECENED APR 10 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CiTY OF CLEARWATER SURVEYOR'S AEPOATJNOTES 1. THIS SURVEY NAS PERFORMED MITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF d CURRENT TITLE POLICY. THERE NAY DE SETBACKS, EASEMENTS, AESTAICTIONS, ANOlOA DTHEA NATTERS OF RECORD NHICN COULD AFFECT THE PROPERTY ANOiOA BOUNDARIES. 2. THE BEARINGS SHONN HEREON AAE BASED ON AN ASSUMED MERIDIAN 6 FIELD OATH. 3. ELEVATIONS SHONN HEREON AAE BASED ON N. G. V. D. d. NO DATA IS SHONN DN THE RECORD PLAT OTHER THAN LOT AND BLOCK INFDANATION d STREET NAAiES. 5. THE INFORMATION SNONN HEREON IS BASE ON THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY AS IT IS MONUNENTED iN THE FIELD. CERTIFIED T0: Y JAMES S. FAONAS V JAMESCHPIS COAPOAATIOH, NcFAALANEA fEAGUSONl6 McNULEN ATTORNEY'S TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC. . LESQ+Ix ~ CENTERLINE d CENTRAL ANGLE A 0 A1C A COND I T I ONEA A (Cl CALCULATED J C. B. S. CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE CH. CHORD CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE CONC. CONCRETE CBICH CHORD BEARING/CHORD EiEY. ELEVATION FCN FOUND WXCAETE MONUMENT FOH FOUND DRILL HOLE FCIA FOUND CAPPED IRON A00 FIA - FOUND I!2' IRON A00 FND ~OONO FNT Fi'iN0 NAIL 6 TIN FOEP FOUb'0 i' OPEN ENO PIPE FPP FOUND PINCHED PIPE LL.F. LONEST i,IVING FLOOR (M) MEASURED NfA NOT APPLICAaLE IPJ PLAT P.B. PLAT BOOK ,,,~ PG. PAGE POB POINT OF BEGINNING POC POINT OF COMMENCENEN'i A RADIUS D SDN OAILL HOLE SET SNT SET NAIL 6 TIN SCIA SET LAPPED IRON AOD X5515 SIA SET IAOH ADO U.E. UTILITY EASEMENT • FFNCE LINE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON NAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT THE S<IRVEY COMPLIES MITN THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA 80AR0 OF PAOFESSIDNAL LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER fiIG•17 F.A.C., PURSUANT TD SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. ALSO, THE SKETCH SHDNN HEREON IS A iAUE AND ACCURATE AEPAESENTA110N DF SAID PROPERTY TO THE BEST OF NY KNDNLEDGE AND BEUEf. SUBJECi TO NOTES AND NOTATIONS SHOMN HEREON. Qiu4, r Q ~S ZOlO MOtL1iWAD B. FAR, P. L S. X5515 GATE NOi VALID UNLESS SIGNED, DATED, AND STAMPED KITH A RAISED EMBOSSED SEAL .~ OOF TOP T 0'-8' _ 3RD_fL00R 1 ?J.F.S. OVER nA50NRY 2Y-4' ND. FLOOR b ~5~-~. I:'-0' 5T. FLOOR ~ 4 EAST ELEVATION SCALE; 3/I6 = I'-0" ~-SIGNS BY TENANT, RPOVIDE o ~ I T ~ U I ~ ~ ~ ` , ~ ~ ~ O ~ Y ELECT. OUTLET ON TIMECLOCK. TYP. 3/16" = i'-0" _O. U z t- W ~_ o~C ~ Q ~ ~~ ~ ~, i r r W ~ ~ pQ r Q #p r_ U ~~ X 0 ~~ ~ t.f) Q c~r1 ~ r DC ~ Q O W ~~ '~ ~ OQ P ~ non 1L '?" U C ~~ ~~~ w e 0 N of N , `~ U ~ 0 .. = o 7t, ~ = u ... ~ U ~ ~ 1" ~V• 1= OVER :RY <.;;f c ` i • ~ I ICI f it ~., b 0 I~~ST ~~.~~~TI0~1 SCALE: 3/I6" = I'-0" •.I,. 4 n RECEIVED d ~R 10 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER b f0'-0' ROOF TOP 3B'-8' 3rd FlR CLG. ~- 30'-e' 3R0_ FLOOR i- EJ.F.S. OVER MASONRY 21'-~' 1ND. FLOOR Q 0 r Q ~'-~' in R'-0' IST. F OOR W ~ _ ~Q _ O N Q ~~S `~ a W - ~U ~' ~U 0~ a z0 ~ z~ gu U z cn t- U w F- ~ a- ~ Q M ~n ~ .a u~ i r r ~ cal Q' cal Q ~~ ~ _ U ,- oc X O w~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ °c ~ ~ o ~ ~ Q ~ a- U ~ Q ~ O cv ~ r 1L ''r U ^^ 1 Q =I ~ v ~ 0 u Z o ~ ~ = V a U ~ O ~v' ~,~RIGIf~AI "~~EIVED .,,~ 2l~ 2006 ti ^LEARWATER G , •- n LJ I~ LJ ~IGINAL ~EIVED 2 ~~ 20f16 DEPARTMENT ~LEARWATER !IGIRAL ~,EIVED 2 ~ 2006 DEPARTME~°•~ CLEARWATE•• • !AL ED 206 ;pARTMENT ARWATER L~