The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-07076 (2)r • ~ Z ~~ ~~~~ f~~~ ~~~ 1 FLD2005-07076 810 S MISSOURI AVE Date Received: 07/28/2005 CROSSINGS (a~ RENAISSANCE SQUARE ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 296A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ,, ~~~,` ~.. ~ ;, ` ,~'` ~.. ,~ :~(,\~~\~J ~ c'am'? fi'~A v -,-'`f ~S ~ N :~'~t \.~ `. ;~~~ . CLWCoverSheet , '~ '"` ~' Planning Dep`4rtmeht o ~ ~- x r .~ r 100 South Myrtle Avenue ~ ~° . ~~,~~,t~r Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 ~ Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2} stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS. PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised o4-OS-OS) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Clearwater Retail Group, Ltd: MAILING ADDRESS: 6000 Lake Forest Drive Suite 560 Atlanta GA 30328-3878 PHONE NUMBER: 404-943-0100 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Same as applicant. (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: E.D. Armstrong III Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel 8: Burns MAILING ADDRESS: 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater Florida 33757 PHONE NUMBER: 461-1818 FAX NUMBER: 441-8617 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: ed(a~ipfirm.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 810 S. Missouri Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 10. Clearwater Retail Subdivision P.B. 124 Pages 92-93 (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 15-29-15-16530-000-0100 PARCEL SIZE: 1.368 ac. (59,570 sg. ft.) (acres, square feet} PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT:32 Multi-family units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms. or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attached Exhibit A Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (incude all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWN€RSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attached Exhibit C 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attached Exhibit C 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attached Exhibit C 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attached Exhibit C 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attached Exhibit C 6. The design of the. proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attached Exhibit C ^ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Attached Exhibit D ~ay~ ~ ~~ ~ - ~~~x~~~C urveioprnen[ ~omprenenswe mnn Appucauon 2005- City of Clearwater 2. The development of the parcel proposed f'or development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See Attached Exhibit D 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See Attached Exhibit D 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See Attached Exhibit D 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Cleanwater. See Attached Exhibit D 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attached Exhibit D 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Attached Exhibit D 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Attached Exhibit D 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See Attached Exhibit D 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. See Attached Exhibit D Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive lnfill Application 2005- City of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMI~_ REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwa~Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. Alt applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem~ to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. _ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable . ^ Ack edgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Storrriwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORM_WAT_ER PLAN AND._ _NONE HA$_BEEN__SUBMITTED, APPL-ICAT-ION-MUST Bf RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; _ Footprint and size of-all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _ Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Nage 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~` _ Location of existing public and privanlTT±ties, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sew'e~~,~es, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index#701}; _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ^ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; - Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; _ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and _ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ^ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/~ X 11) and color rendering if possible; ^ FOR DEVEtOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; _ All open space areas; _ Location of alt earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) O LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures, _ Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _ Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; _ Proposed and required parking spaces;. Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; _ Location, size, and quantities of aII existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; _ Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; _ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); _ Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 '/ X 11) (color rendering if possible); ^ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • CLEARWATER RETAIL GROUP, LTD. RENAISSANCE SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CITY OF CLEARWATER July 28, 2005 REVI5ED..AUGUST 9, 2005 IC.\Clearwater Retail -Lots 8 & 9\Reports\Cover Shcet.doc REVISED SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 ORIGINAL • '~ f i t ; ,~~~ i i f • • CLEARWATER RETAIL GROUP, LTD. RENAISSANCE SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LIST OF EXHIBITS APPLICATION FORM EXHIBIT A Variance/Flexibility Request Checklist EXHIBIT B Deed to the Property EXHIBIT C Applicant's Response to General Applicability Criteria EXHIBIT D ~ Applicant's Response to Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Criteria EXHIBIT E Affidavit to Authorize Agent EXHIBIT F Stormwater Narrative • • EXHIBIT A CITY OF CLEAI~WATER VARIANCE/ FLEXIBILITY REQUEST CHECKLIST Revised September 7, 2005 PROJECT: Renaissance Square Condominiums LOCATION: 801 South Missouri Avenue APPLICABLE ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial ("C") APPLICABLE PLAN CATEGORY: Commercial General TYPE OF APPLICATION: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Flexibility requests are shown in italics with shading. DENSITY Commercial General Plazz Cate o Comp Plan Allowable Densi Requested Densi 24 units/acre 24 units/acre, 32 units Use of TDR's N.A. FLOOR AREA RATIO Commercial General Plazz Category Comp Plan Allowable FAR Requested Floor Area Ratio N.A.-Residential Use N.A. Use of TDR's N.A. LOT CHARACTERISTICS Commercial ~istzict Re uirement Re uest Size 10,000 sq. ft. 59,569 sq. ft. (1.368 acres) Width 100' 224' Exhibit A Variance/Flexibility Request Checklist HEIGHT Commercial District Re uirement _ Re .oast Main Buildin 25' S2' 2 % " MechanicaVAppurtenances 16' above main roof Decorative Clock Tower- 67' 8" Justification: The first level of the proposed building will be parking and floors 2-4 are the livable floors containing a total of 32 multi-family units. The roof has been designed at an appropriate scale to the building. The residential buildings in the vicinity as part of the Sunshine Mall site have been approved and constructed at a similar or taller height, in some cases. A decorative clock tower is proposed to be located at the northeast corner of the building near the intersection of Missouri Avenue and Druid Road. This tower will be entirely decorative in nature, without any livable space and merely serves to identify the project and provide architectural interest. SETBACKS-For Parking and Building Commercial District Re uirement Re oast Front 25' for building Missouri-70' to pool 15' for parking 80' to building 10' to parking Druid-45' to building 10' to avement Side 10' South-16' to building West- 53' to building S' to arkin Rear N.A.-Corner Lot N.A. Justification: The setbacks to the residential structure are greatly in excess of the required setbacks. The request for a deviation on Missouri Avenue is solely for 6 parking spaces which represent 63 linear feet as a relatively small portion of the overall frontage of 224 feet. Similarly, the request for a deviation on Druid Street is only for the pavement. The building is setback a distance almost twice the required setback but the drive aisle is within the setback. This setback flexibility serves two purposes: it creates an effective circulation pattern around the building and maintains an adequate separation from the esirl~tiai-~aijzihrtg-fpm tie commercia res auran o its soot . Exhibit A Variance/Flexibility Request Checklist The deviation on the west property line is also only for the paving. On the west property line, there will be a 5' landscaped buffer adjacent to the internal roadway that provides access to another residential .project within Sunshine Mall. Additional setback and landscaping is unnecessary since the adjoining use is an internal roadway. Overall, the relatively minor deviations for paving only are justifiable since the project provides significant setbacks to the residential structure, maintains effective separation from the commercial structures and meets all dimensional requirements for parking and access. PARKING Use: Multi-Family Ratio Required Number Request Residential Re uired Number of Spaces 1.5 per unit 48 spaces 64 spaces Per HDR district Dimensions of 9' x 19' -- 9' x 19' s aces Dimensions of Drive 24' two-way -- 24' two-way Aisle Note: No deviations requested. Exhibit A ~ • Variance/Flexibility Request Checklist LANDSCAPING Re uirement Re uest Perimeter Landscaping (Sec. 3-1202D.1) Adjacent to Road Missouri- 15' 63' of total length at 10' Balance of 125' length at widths ranging from 22'to 40' Druid- 10' 10' Ad jacent to Another Use N rth ll ' ' o -co ector road-15 10 South-Non-Residential - 5' S' in southeast and southwest corners of site 16' for balance of property line West-Multifamily- 10' S' Percentage of Vehicular 10% of Vehic. Use Area 31 Use Area (Sec. 3-1202D.4) ISR-Commercial General .95 .'76 Plan Cate or Justification: The request is for a deviation to the perimeter landscaping along a small portion of Missouri Avenue. The entire frontage is approximately 188 feet in length; the deviation requests that the buffer be reduced in size for 63 feet of the total or only 34% of the total frontage. For the balance of the frontage, the landscape buffer varies in width from 22 feet to 40 feet. Overall, the landscape buffer averages well over 15 feet in width. As discussed above in the Setback section, a deviation to the landscape buffer along the west property line is justified and reasonable since the adjoining use is an internal roadway serving the residential project to the south. A deviation to a small portion of the required buffer along the south property line is requested. The required buffer is ten feet and for the majority of the distance along the south property line, the buffer exceeds the requirement at 16 feet. For two small areas in the southeast and southwest corners of the site, the required buffer is reduced to five feet. To increase the buffer to the required width would make the site plan impractical, by reducing the number of parking spaces. The small reduction in buffer area is 'ustifiable a ows a si e o mee e par mg requirements. Exhibit A Variance/Flexibility Request Checklist FENCES (Sec. 3-801-808) Commercial District Re uirement Re _ .oast I€eight ~ Setbacks 6' height ok in required setback Pool Fence at 6' height located 60' from Missouri VARIANCE TO FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SPECIFIC USE None Proposed. ••ur-ca-v~ lu:4ram f~OAi=JQHNSON,POPE.ILP 72T44~8617 T=478. P.42I04 ~ F-955 ~,.__.____ - - =• EXHIBIT "B" i "~ ~~~ :' 89-:iSgq~~ r1fiY,.e ~!$t Copy ~P?E. ~ Pi~~. Lo sic loszie e:3s ~c~7~~"~S-~ _~"_~; .~ u~~~ra~~i~,oaa-~~~ is~3 A~ailablet. Y'1tE1~Aia:1~.8Y.JU1D RE ~ ~o:. , ,~~? St. Z'a~];tati tiaird~ .>r:` :• a (ta) Ii,` k~;~ l~sSOiQi -qe R~chhri~ay• FAfkeY ~~ ~ .~ 1Ei-t[tAgWr1p~t.1€7AA:iQd~a Lin 12~].P1rk St•.taa~. ~E[p~flS:fib)1a6~ i-. •13`!a , ela~ivarer; 3'lorl~Sd~'.3i'S~6 ~~TPtW~7A219 j (~{~~ t . ' ^~ / Qii[ Mif.1E71EEAElt t~191:7c r ~~ • ~?~ ~f~ iiliftRaNxY u~a - - th ~ - ; "R f.3iR1iAT~ . ~ ~;~~, ~i~~.q tt}18 '~:,.:..: daX. q€- MzYs; ?9~9r.: -- _ ~~ sii4' "'~!~ _ tea' 8 ~i-1-Tie : ~;~ ~~I.crrt; : a..~~r#~a - ~: - ~- f~f~ ~-.'ilk?6 Pcstr"~K~r''i?r-.V~,~i~A~;~3~A'. .li~~,ta' `~'_ "'l• .:fin' -riCrt LJ - ,.~ - ~,~,. - : ~3~~~~i~ .~: ~: - .. - .. • . Via. ` ~ .~~ !~~-~: `p.',~ !~ '~ .~~~ a W - - -~. > :, Via:.-~ . ~ =_ .t~e~i'i~.- - ~ - ..: _ .~ ,- ... .. =:. ~n~.: - _ - .-, ~ .. - - '.lie 'b :,~~~9aiiiaCf,'. +a ~ ` mo 'L6- - -`~ a r -~'g 31~ : ~ i.sL11l~- ~ its bm~ng :1tf - .. ~~Y tuf~ ~.:..._• -- ~ :. '. _~` i~~'°:0~- ~3Cliii#~:.a~_t34tad^~o.~: i~Ql~i~ r' - ..a -td-~iir..- - <.:... . - j .` °_r Y.~1'l~i~..~!A. f.E}.#coh~,harOrc IEiiiC ir..s4a ~;::pai`C •~i3tregi. - ~ ' c t --3FCr_ :TO: r6vari ~Q ~ ~ _ - : -~ - . --e - `' ~•-~-: - - .~'..,"' ..~-~ ; >-. ~I• ctj6~is - eRG.1ts . of - ;..::,., `'-::iat,~~ ~.~..: ,r, : ~e~~.-. _ ;~`;~ :~"~ parr. ~2te .ye5r: ::`<;. ~' -{~-f;.~.:,.~;:, -~4~.Esf'ajtc.:PA><oe1~.Ho~: ~:r..:: -- .-,:• :::O~s.] - . - ~{~g - - ~ r,-.. - - ,~. . .. - .~>e~c,~, u~:~~-".sl...- a :its; ~~g =~ra~i~'a~' •~~s i~ °s~p~.~~ - '. :.. .. _ - .~--v':~f''£s~- ,~.r~''''(~Sta9`:Y52li'' ~,L'bY it~"dt•:.N1 ~-i._ - - ~~~. x - .. - ~L~Y a,<-•• ,~, ~ '~'s. ~_h' -f¢s_~~fo;§t~P,~ ~_ e~+~~~ tT :=~~?'~~i~.G' "'t;hA'. ... 3. ~~~ ~~~-~~~.j'n~,.,~~~ sa~a;~~~~.:~.a ~,a~j~"y~,..tl~_ fiat, j r. .~.~t~~~~~::,;;.~~~.an~=~~x~tsq=:~X,`~~-,ro~ 'o~tiad~~:r:~ nor - - .. .. ; . : ~~~iz-.:~rkrrr~s._ o_ ~ -~Gricctiis=. - '- :.- ~ - - - ~it~:%s~i<f'i[~zy~:.~ ' had -h~xeuiiE9. -E~C:..Graraeoir ^: band 1: -- : -:.-', - ;..: ~~ . _: ~.Y ~ Y~~=~~uC- .=~-~' lei.;. - ~Q:,. ~ ~V4r§~ ~. _ _ I - r ..:, B~f.:. `. ..s. ...-, . .. ..- .. ~9rf~+;~i" : 1923!: V e re§ : OiiL. .~;. - _ ?"':iW'~? car. - .. -. - :. v ....: ...- -lam, - 1 .. - :;; ~ .t~ ..~.~'.~~.s-, , ~ ~ may. • ~ .1lA. Yyy.T • t. 4~. a1-25=05 10:46am fro~h=JOHNSQN,PQRE;LLP T2T44.18617 T-4T9 P.03/04 f=955 ` 7y~- , '~`+r~:tn~; rs~va vv~:Ir ~~ ",~i}~~ts a ~. ~ ~~~ ~., ~' • ` P 1F+ELLRS ;COtmTr ••'."' ~~~~~ n ',~'. "" ` ` ~s ~ M • t '- `. oFF .RAC _BK 10324 P~ • : ~ ,~~ ~ ~ ,ss• ti. j r~~w :r. .. ~ 1680 's ,~.<+~.-` <~+~~'_', r.~ :_ :,.~:;r•.. ~.~ Sl'A~P GF Ftb • '• ~ 't ' •; `' 5- ~ ~ r~,; ~y,'•;. - me, ari oter ~dy1y ~th~ize this dt~y psi eQilaliy. ~~SAeared bcPare f~ +•..%',,;• +`~~~ ~ d.tn tak6 $~ottled~emcntp Larry x' ,> . - ,: Flory, Vice ~~s3eler}t nP CS,fi11It~A~' ~ p~~ , ; ::~~, .. ER : I1iS9Z~W ESSOC7.7lZ'~5 ~ INC.. , d ~ •.• . Florida oorpbxA ots Who is . • . , - `'-~'::: tlduced • r ~~aual~~y known to ma or.' who ~a8 ' :. ~ .:;, _ acri da --~-- as 3.deeltfiastiop and he is the ,.• ,Y > - ',._~:~; - who ax9catgd the ~oo~goin} Spncia7, N~~a27jty .X`,, r `^ ; `"` ~,, . •' >]aedc dnd ~~ ~cla~owleclg8d thch ~ 'ther^n helots sae feat ha• ~C6cu~ed Y j ~ •~• „z;_ fhA o ~[~ ri~~ .p~i`lcu,~ on lieha~ ~pt exi4 corpcratinn !br the: `Vi'a-~ ~a `' ... ~ ~ o~X~tiri~ ~ieYdirS expressed, and •~6et 6~id Dae~ ~s. the 1~ct' and dead. :•',~ .~ ~~.",<" ~;~:..~ ,,.~ . Tci'~s, ~9Y head and .o~rhi:~~,: ~ ~ ,~ 1. v • C ~.i ~. • ^°• j7.wr j ~~+I ~'- ~,ea•1'(~~i`Z•',l~ak'piI16~Yd~.- ... q,~ •T ,t ,. - .. - , :'.,;,j~~~ t•I;tea ~ _r. ~ 1. t:' ~ - .. 11 ~.- Y ~.~-T~ .cry ,sue k~ ~ - s u ak ~•~5~'.' ~ , t E ,~ 1 ~ ~ ti C J .. .t ~ Si f'ib' j'M`a ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ r!, ~ i~~c~ « ~a 1~.. ry~ ~ ` ~ f . ~' tiT • J f 1- .y .Vt ~~iL . '` . _' 6'~~~'i . 4 t ' ~~.~ F ~ J.b - 17ti y . ~ i't ~~-r~ t~ :, t ~'+l'~z ~ o ~~' rz ~~~ } ~~~ ~l•• X, f ~v. .ri- ~3.yjf.KTC<..n,r~~1. .;f '`~ 07-25=05 10:49am F'rtiinyJ.OHN$ON,POPI.LLP 12T4d16617 T-4T9 P:041D4 F-955 ~ t :~'~l ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ Siff?~ ' y~ ! ~ 4 ~IP~C t "'Iv't+'it~~~ 'F: ~,~~ ,~! •Q' ^ . .: i•: rf 1- _.. ... ~: •'.~.r.Y. ~~~a.~t:3•:~~~~, MYi'rih~ji.Y.T'4L.•.wA. ~_:~.. .~1u i~. _l.i. 4 • ~••' ' ~ . `, ~ i P.SHELL;RS ,CQ1JN'fY PLA .. '• • ~ l)} F :RAC a3K 10524. PQ t56 l • j. . . . • i • ~: ~i . : - ~ .. ~ II ~ 1 i I -~ .. f . _ is ~ ~ ~ j t - ~ i ,'.. _. ~'~ t,. _ . • ~ ~ ` 11~T .} .L F_ ,~_.... . ~• .~` . r ~~: , •`- ..• . , ' ~ .~, : , ~ ; -= _ . . . ,._.• :_ • e: ~. . _ ~: ~ .. ; . , ;,r -~~: • ;. : . _~~--` :;~.. ,, ...r fY , .r .?vN ~,y .~. L ~ ~ , .j~:; .r.•.• k ° ,. _:, =' . EXHIBIT C RENAISSANCE SQUARE, PARCEL 10 Revised September 7, 2005 APPLICANT'S RESPONSES TO GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The project has been designed to be compatible with the existing residential structures contained within the same overall master site plan. The height, bulk, coverage and density of this building is similar or less intense in some cases than the existing residential communities located within Sunshine Mall. The proposed residential structure has been carefully designed to effectively serve as part of a mixed-use project and help implement a more livable community. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The parcel is completely surrounded by existing development and, therefore, development of this site will not have a negative effect on future development. In addition, all of the existing uses in the area are compatible with the proposed multi-family use. To the immediate west and adjacent to this site is an existing low-rise multi-family residential development. Immediately to the south of this site are Wendy's restaurant and a small retail center as well as a connection to the Mainstreet Apartments. Across Druid Street to the north is a restaurant and office building, both developed at a low intensity. Development to the east across Missouri Avenue is commercial in nature and due to the expansive distance between the site and the commercial uses, it is not expected that the residential development would have any negative effects on those commercial sites. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The project is proposed for development as 32 multi-family units in one building. By its very nature, this residential use will not have any adverse impact on the health or safety of the existing residents or employees in the area. • • 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The project will utilize the existing driveway on Missouri Avenue that previously served Visionworks; this will be a right-in/right-out only movement. Access to the site is also provided from Druid Street via the existing driveway that connects this site, Wendy's restaurant, the retail center and the Mainstreet apartments. There will be no new driveways to serve the site and all existing driveways are shared connections, thus there will be no new traffic impacts. In addition, all parking for this development will be provided on site with 64 parking spaces provided and no variances requested to the number of spaces. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Renaissance Square, formerly known as the Sunshine Mall, is primarily developed with residential uses containing a variety of unit types. The development of the last vacant parcel as residential use will be consistent with , the existing residential community character. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. By its nature and use characteristics, the proposed residential use will not generate any adverse effects on adjacent properties. This parcel is the last vacant parcel within Renaissance Square and the residential use will complement the existing residential buildings and the existing commercial uses. The proposed multifamily development is part of an urban mixed use project containing other multifamily dwellings, restaurant and retail uses. The overall site formerly known as Sunshine Mall is located within a mixed use commercial corridor that provides many opportunities for shopping, restaurants and services to the residents. This project will not have any visual, acoustic, olfactory of hours of operation impact on the existing commercial businesses in the vicinity. EXHIBIT D RENAISSANCE SQUARE, PARCEL 10 APPLICANT'S RESPONSES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA Revised September 7, 2005 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. There are no deviations requested to the use or intensity standards. The proposed use of attached residential units is allowed in the Commercial General Plan category at a density of 24 units per acre and the developer complies with the density and Impervious Surface Ratio. The project does request reasonable deviations to some of the development standards, specifically the height, setbacks to pavement and landscape buffer widths. The development would be impractical without the deviations requested and they are explained in detail in the response to Criterion 7 below. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) The vacant site is currently valued by the Pinellas County Property Appraiser at $ 600,600. When fully developed with all improvements, the site is expected to be valued at approximately $ 8,000,000, a significant increase in value. The quality of the improvements will be similar to the residential development by the same master developer within the overall project and is therefore, expected to have a positive effect on the value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Residential development is permitted in a variety of zoning districts with the City of Clearwater and, therefore, the request to allow residential use through the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application is consistent. The history of the Sunshine Mall may help illuminate why the site is currently zoned Commercial but primarily developed with residential uses. When the developer obtained the property and demolished the old mall, the site was zoned General Commercial under the City's old Zoning Code. The old • • Zoning Code allowed residential use in commercial districts. Therefore, the developer applied for and received approval fora "Certified Site Plan" under the old Zoning Code on the entire property showing the intended residential and commercial uses. However, when the City transitioned to the new Community Development Code in 1999, residential use was not permitted in the new Commercial zoning district, unless as part of a mixed use. The new Community Development Code did establish the tool of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to allow for unusual situations and creative projects such as the Renaissance Square. This project requests to use the Comprehensive Infill tool to complete the Renaissance Square project and build the final residential building on the site. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. As described in detail in General Applicability Criteria # 2 above, the proposed residential project will be consistent and compatible with the existing development which is primarily residential uses. The proposed multifamily development is part of an urban mixed use project containing other multifamily dwellings, restaurant and retail uses. The overall site formerly known as Sunshine Mall is located within a mixed use commercial corridor that provides many opportunities for shopping, restaurants and services to the residents. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The site was previously the location of Visionworks who subsequently moved to a new building south of this property. Currently, the site is vacant and awaiting development. The new construction as part of the Renaissance Square mixed-use project will be a great improvement to the overall site as it completes the development. The proposed use is consistent with the surrounding uses and the design will complement the existing buildings. 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. As described earlier, the project proposes a residential structure of 4 stories, designed to be compatible with the architecture of the existing residential communities within Renaissance Square, in terms of height, style and design. The form and function of the proposed building is consistent with the existing • • community character and will enhance the existing overall project. The development of the last available lot of Renaissance Square will complete the development, increase the value of the site and make a major contribution to the City's ad valorem tax roll, increasing the assessed value from $600,000 to $8,000,000, an approximate sevenfold increase in value. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The project meets the lot width and size requirements as well as the parking requirements. The project requests reasonable deviations to the height, setbacks to pavement and landscape buffer width. Each of these three requests is described in detail below. Hei hg t Re uest The first level of the proposed building will be parking and floors 2-4 are the livable floors containing a total of 32 multi-family units. The roof has been designed at an appropriate scale to the building. The residential buildings in the vicinity as part of the Sunshine Mall site have been approved and constructed at a similar or taller height, in some cases. The height deviation is requested since the height allowed in the Commercial district is relatively low which is impractical to meet given the desired number of dwellings that the site can support. A decorative clock tower is proposed to be located at the northeast corner of the building near the intersection of Missouri Avenue and Druid Road. This tower will be entirely decorative in nature, without any livable space and merely serves to identify the project and provide architectural interest. To limit the clock tower to a maximum height of 25 feet would be impractical and would not produce the desired effect of identity and architectural interest. Setback Deviation Re uest The setbacks to the residential structure are greatly in excess of the required setbacks. The request for a deviation on Missouri Avenue is solely for 6 parking spaces which represent 63 linear feet as a relatively small portion of the overall frontage of 224 feet. Similarly, the request for a deviation on Druid Street is only for the pavement. The building is setback a distance almost twice the required setback but the drive aisle is within the setback. This setback flexibility serves two purposes: it creates an effective circulation pattern around the building and maintains an adequate separation from the residential building from the commercial • • restaurant to its south. In addition, the total landscape width as viewed by citizens will be 15 feet as the total width to the back of the sidewalk. The deviation on the west property line is also only for the paving. On the west property line, there will be a 5' landscaped buffer adjacent to the internal roadway that provides access to another residential project within Sunshine Mall. Additional setback and landscaping is unnecessary since the adjoining use is an internal roadway. Overall, the relatively minor deviations for paving only are justifiable since the project provides significant setbacks to the residential structure, maintains effective separation from the commercial structures and meets all dimensional requirements for parking and access. If the setback deviations are not granted, many changes to the site would be required that would render the site plan impractical, such as requesting a reduction to the number of parking spaces. Landscape Buffer Request The request is for a deviation to the perimeter landscaping along a small portion of Missouri Avenue. The entire frontage is approximately 188 feet in length; the deviation requests that the buffer be reduced in size for 63 feet of the total length or only 34% of the total frontage. For the balance of the frontage, the landscape buffer varies in width from 22 feet to 40 feet.. Overall, the landscape buffer averages well over 15 feet in width. The applicant requests a deviation to the required buffer along Druid Road where fifteen feet in width is required and ten feet is provided. The requested reduction is consistent with the ten foot wide buffer approved in the master plan previously approved by the Community Development Board. In addition, if not approved, the required buffer would render the site plan impractical since the larger buffer would result in deviations to the parking aisle or parking dimensions within the parking garage. The reduction of five feet in the buffer is a reasonable request and has the least negative impact on the site plan's effectiveness. As discussed above in the Setback section, a deviation to the landscape buffer along the west property line is justified and reasonable since the adjoining use is an internal roadway serving the residential project to the south. Without this deviation, the site would be impractical to develop. A deviation to a small portion of the required buffer along the south property line is requested. The required buffer is ten feet and for the majority of the distance along the south property line, the buffer exceeds the requirement at 16 feet. For two small areas in the southeast and southwest corners of the site, the required buffer is reduced to five feet. To increase the buffer to the required width would make the site plan impractical, by reducing the number • • of parking spaces. The small reduction in buffer area is justifiable and allows the site to meet the parking requirements. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 o Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. The project exceeds the required parking of 1.5 spaces per unit by providing 2 units per unit and all required handicapped parking. There are no deviations requested to the parking requirements for this project. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). This criterion is not applicable to this project since it is not located in either the Tourist or Downtown Districts. • EXH~6IT E • AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Clearwater Retail Group, Ltd„ a Florida limited artnershi (Names of atl property owners on deed -please PRINT full names) 1. That n an/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general iocation): 810 South Missouri Avenue 2. That this property constitutes the property forwhtch a request fora: (desrxibe request) Flexible Development_Approval for"comprehensive infih redevelopment proiect 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (dces/do) appoint: E . D . Arn-strong III , Esquire , Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & burns, LLP as (hisAheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions ar other documents necessary fA affect such petition; 4. That Ws affidavit has been executed fA induce the City of Clearwater, Fbrida to consider and act on the above described property; 5; That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and Ore owner authorizes City representatrves to visit and photograph the property described in This appGcafrcm; s. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certiy that the foregoing is hue and correct. Clearwater Retail Group, Ltd. Property owner P' a ie so 'ates, Inc. Property owner y: Brooks A. Hat ie , rest e Property Owner Property Owner S2`ATE OF GEORGIA .. ~ . ~. COUhITY OF ~ (j~p N ~ .. Coeor~y~a, n fore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of fhxi8s, on this oc Jr K . Q2 D.~ personaty appeared Brooks A. Hatfield* o having been t rte es and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed- My Commission Expires: Nota Public * As President of Clearwater - Pineview Associates, Inc. General Partner of Clearwater Retail Group T~imited SlPtanrting DepartmentlApplicaGon fom+sldevrlopment mvrewtllexibte development application 2005.doc day of sworn 1 ~~~~~~; • • Exhibit "F" RENAISSANCE SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE INFILL APPLICATION STORMWATER NARRATIVE The stormwater management plan for the Renaissance Square Condominiums is part of the master stormwater plan for the Renaissance Square overall site. With the development of Renaissance Square, the former Sunshine Mall site, a master plan was prepared to manage stormwater runoff over the entire site; this master plan was reviewed and .approved by the City of Clearwater in 1998. All collection and treatment facilities were sized to handle the overall site including the runoff from this site. The stormwater runoff from this site is collected and then distributed into the existing stormwater pond that is located to the west of this site adjacent to the shared roadway that runs along the western border of this site. The construction drawings and final plat for Renaissance Square have previously been approved by the City of Clearwater. The final plat for "Clearwater Retail" that includes this property as Lot 10 was recorded on July 30, 2002 in Plat Book 124, Page 92. A copy of the final plat is included in this application package. All subdivision improvements, including the stormwater pond to be used for this site, have been constructed according to the approved construction drawings. August 9, 2005 l!'.i ~ • ~- Planning and Development Services O ~ - 100 South Myrtle Avenue ~ - ~i r ~~r , ~ Telephoner 7271562-4567 .,. >. ; - Fax: 727-562-4576 U ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND N~TARVFD APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: / WEST: / EAST• / COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revised 9/l9/200]) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-1001) Clearwater Retail Group, Ltd. APPLICANT NAME: 6000 Lake Forest Drive, Suite 560, Atlanta, GA. 30328-3878 MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 404-943-0100 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Same a5 applicant (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) E. D. Armstrong. III, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns.,.LLP MAILING ADDRESS: 911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33757 PHONE NUMBER: 461-1818 (727) FAX NUMBER: 441-8617 (727) The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the information provided on this worksheet: %..~ 1. Architectural Theme. -.._._ C> ~ a. The landscaping iri a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural °- ~- theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. ~ ~' ~. y-•y See Exhi3ii:t "A" attached for responses to 1 through 5. ~""` • • OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive . Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. ~'. i i`I• ~ n f ~ ` ^~ O ~ I„1w~ ~ ` f p•_1 :.~~.. wr • • .Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Please return checklist for review and verification. ~ / Date: (Signature of appli ) E. D. Armstro~ g~II~- -, ,_, ~ ~ r jj . "."r=~ I i i -~ S: application forms/development review/comprehensive landscape program applicatio ~.doc. J~' 0 ~ ~~~~ I J ~" f ~ .~ ~ •i s. : i • • EXHIBIT "A" TO COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM APPLICATION FLD2005-07076 - 810 South Missouri- Avenue This application is submitted in conjunction with an application for flexible development approval for a comprehensive infill redevelopment project to allow the vacant parcel at the southwest corner of Missouri Avenue and Druid Road to be redeveloped with a 32- unit multi-family project. The proposed development is described ~ in detail in the applicant's flexible development application. Written Submittal Requirements 1) Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The landscaping proposed has been designed as part of the architectural theme of the building. The proposed foundation landscape exceeds the minimum landscape code, and enhances the architecture. Palm trees are proposed as vertical accents for the building's attractive clock tower. Cypress trees enforce the northern facades architectural rhythm. Canopy and accent trees proposed for the southern facade will act as a screen between the commercial and residential properties. In addition, the building's facade is completely landscaped with shrubs and groundcover, which will give the building a human scale. The reason for this request is to seek relief from the minimum landscaping requirements as follows: {1) a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue to allow a 10-foot buffer [to pavement ,and. ~dumpster,enclosure] • where 15 feet is required by Code' ~~ ~ i = I ' ~ ' I i +. ~,' ~ ~ `~ j ~~ t I.;~ i~ ; i ~ 5F~ ~ ~ ,..,.._ ~, ~ . fL~~ ~: u r~ a • (2) a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line to allow a 5-foot buffer [to pavement] where 10 feet is required by Code; and (3) a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line to allow a 5-foot buffer [to pavement] where 10 feet is required by Code. As previously discussed, the proposed landscape plan is part of an architectural theme for the proposed building on the property, and it is also compatible with the architecture and landscaping of the other multi-family residential projects located on Missouri Avenue on the former site of Sunshine Mall. The setbacks to the residential structure itself are greatly in excess of the required setbacks. Deviations to the width of the landscape buffers allow for an effective circulation pattern around the building. -_---------1'" G~~ " Portions of the buffer along South Missouri exceed 15 ; however the reduced ~~ ~, buffer (10) is necessary to accommodate the proposed parking spaces. The ~;,~~ ~ ~.s previously approved site plan (2001) depicted an 8' buffer on Missouri. ~\~ ~' -- ~ i `~~~'• On the west ro ert li t p p y ne, he proposed buffer connects to the median .;, =- ~ ~ ~ ~u' improvements on the adjoining parcel to the south. o { ii - _. ~ _ , ^ ~' -~-~ "`:Overall, the relatively minor deviations requested are justifiable since the project E .;:;provides significant setbacks to the residential structure, maintains effective --~ ~ :' separation from the commercial structures and meets all dimensional -- ---- ~_ ~= requirements for parking and access. The proposed interior green space greatly °~- exceeds Code requirements. 2) Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a .part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. Due to the residential use, 24 hour lighting is essential to the health, safety and welfare of the residents, employees and passersby. The proposed lighting does not intrude into neighboring residences. 3) Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. As shown on the enclosed plan, the proposed landscaping is a significant ~ enhancement to the parcel. This site was the location of the former Vision Works ; building for many .years, and had little landscaping or enhancements. The ~ - beautification of this site has a favorable impact on the community character. ---~ Y • • 4) Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The level of landscape treatment proposed will crea#e a beneficial impact on surrounding property values. 5) Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Not applicable. 9/8/2005 10:54 AM 46230.110132 #352564 v1 - Clwr Retail/Ex to Comp Landscape .. - T r _ ~ .'_- __ - ~ , . ~ j + ~ =. i~ L.~- N ~ - r-u ~., r ~ ~ - `- ~.~_ ~ a,. , ~_' V i i. ` fL r ~ : . -~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~-~ / ~~ t Ti21A1~1i 'R' TYf'. ~~ 8 4 1 TO DQ511N6 1 SITE PLAN ~~ ~v ~~ Renaissance Clearwater, F1orIlda E10511N6 DRIVEWAY CONNEC11011 TO RFIUW (NO WORN MITNIN DOT R/W) Squar ~ Parker Associates p p O ~Z04 L ~ 40~ buf11 IWW OK 74100 ~W1ej-742-24se 1 SITE PLAN 1'=20'-0' REV9/6/201,., \VIVlI LLVLLJ E%ISTING DRIYEWAV CONNECPON TO REMAIN (NO WORK NITHIN OOT R/W~ Renaissance Clearwater, Florida Squar \ \ \ ~ p O Parker Associates 2202 E. 48th Street South Suite 200 Tuleo OK 74105 (B1Bs-742-2483 Renaissance Square Clearwater, Florida 1 GARAGE LEVEL PLAN VB'=I'-0' f~V 9l6R0(6 Parker Associates 2202 E. 49th Stroet South swta 200 Tul~o ON 74105 (81Bs-742-2485 Renaissance Square SECOND LE~/EL PLAN Clearwater, Florida ~ i~a•=~--o• REV 9/6/05 io uNtrs / FLR. Parker Associates 2202 E. 4Blh Street South Suite 200 Tulee OK 74105 (B19f-742-2495 Renaissance Square THIRD/E^URTH LEVEL PLAN Clearwater, Florida 1- I~a•=l--o• REV 9/6/05 Il UNITS / FLR •~. y .t t ~ 1 ~~ Parker Associates 2202 E. 49th Street South Suite 200 Tutee OK 74105 (91Bf -712-2468 ReYldlSSa1'1Ce S(~Llare MISSOURI AVENUE ELEVATION ~ Parker Associates Clearwater, Florida 2202 a s9te zoo®c s°"`h T~ISa OK ]4105 (91 Bj-]42-2485 SW8 BA~nr.~ anrv~ BftON2E SENSAT AL $AN~ SMNOY~ Renaissance Square 1 DRUID ROAD ELEVATI^N Clearwater, Florida 2202 E. 49th Shoot South Suite 200 Tuloa OK ]4105 (91 Bf-]42-2485 Renaissance Square SEUTH ELEVATION ~ 2202 E. 49th Street South Clearwater, Florida 1 Parks~~Aszootates Tulna, OK X4105 (B1 B)-762-2485 SENSAnONAL SANG SMBOB~ SWBOB~ SENSATONAL SAND SWE094 Renaissance Clearwater, Florida Square ~ WESTELEVATIDN 1 Parker Associates 2202 E. 49th Street South Suite 200 Tulsa, OK ]4105 (91 B)-]42-2485 • Renaissance Square 1 MISS^URI AVENUE E~EVATI^N Clearwater, Florida Parker Associates 7~0] G. 49tH Street South Suite ~~~ Tuloo. OK ]4105 (910)-!n~ 7095 /~ 1 JAN 8, 1,99,8...,; "~ : 53PM OFF. REC. BK 9457 PG 1937 •~jy, DECLARATION OF:`REC~PROCAL EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS t ..,,`` t~ THIS DECLARATION'=,is ~•made as of the 5`" day of January, 1998, J ~~ Frrpanm~., by The Clearwater Group:; Ltd. , A Florida Limited Partaerahip j acc~ i U~' ("Declarant") ; DS r~ ~\T '~' - g I T H E S S E T H• rcts_ ~1TF_____^y WHEREAS;~'~~Dec~arant is the owner of all that tract or parcel ric of land lying aiid' being in Pinellas County, Florida, and being ~~~------~~,.~nore particul'a~~~+ described on Exhibit A attached hereto and by To.~~~~'/this ref~r~rice-•:inade part hereof (the "Property") , and being ^depicted',on'•~;the plan attached hereto as Exhibit s and by this ~~referen~ce~:mad~ a part hereof (the "Site Plan"j . FiH$REAB, each "Parcel" as shown on the Site Plan may - here~Yr~~ter be referred to separately by its parcel number, ~~ Rte.^•,i.L°~•:' gen~rich~ly as a "Parcel", in plural as the "Parcels" and all of ~cc7 .K.a~ the :=p~r~els shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as the _-_~_Px'ope~ty; and ~'_ N`IiEYtEAB, because the Property will be developed in separate fi-= _~. S~.~araels of multiple uses, Declarant desires to create and P+=~ ---=---es~~blish certain easements, restrictions, rights and obligations '"c ---~=-~-oath respect thereto. ~n:~C iwT -- ~ NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant as owner of the Property for ~ ~~T~'~//`// ~ tself, its successors in interest and title and assigns j '7"''~`declares, establishes, grants and conveys as follows: _ 1. Ingress and Egress. Declarant does hereby establish and create for the benefit of the Property and does hereby grant and convey to each and every person, corporation and other entity hereafter owning all or any portion of any interest in the Property or any of the Parcels (the "Owner(s)"), a perpetual non- exclusive easement, license, right and privilege of passage and use both pedestrian and vehicular, as appropriate, for purposes of ingress and egress, in, to, upon and over any and all roads, driveways, traffic lanes, entrances and exits located on the Property, as the same presently exist or may from time to time be established or relocated. The easement granted in this Paragraph 1 shall be for the non-exclusive use of the Owners of the various Parcels, their customers, employees, tenants, agents, guests, invitees and licensees in common with one another. The easement areas established in this Paragraph 1 shall not r be fenced, blocked or used in any other way that would impair the ~ free flow of pedestrian or vehicular traffic in accordance with ~; the provisions hereof. .:-,. CCLt~~ ~~- , ~~ ~ y~~ ~ O~j/ ~~1~ PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 9957 PG 1938 2. No Park?ng R~c~~. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained or implied in this Declaration, no parking - easement or license has:;~been, or is hereby, established; it being specifically agreed and understood that all parking required, or otherwise maintained,'`-,nconnection with the operation of the ~ businesses located"'Art-.-~aah of the Parcels, shall be self- contained. All Pa~cel.Owners shall employ their best efforts to insure that all veH~icular parking by their tenants, customers, employees, agents,~••nvitees and licensees shall be accomplished solely and exclusively upon each such Owner's Parcel. 3. util+i`ties: Declarant does hereby grant and convey to ~ the Owners Af~'th?e'Property or any of the Parcels, or any portion thereof, and `does hereby establish and create for the benefit of the Property'.aigd each Parcel, perpetual reciprocal non=exclusive easements.._'~in;~bver, under, upon and across the designated non- building~~,areas of the Total Property for the purposes of install?irig;naintaining, operating, repairing, replacing and - renewt~g:.;any'and all utility lines and related facilities serving in pa~~._ or in whole any portion of the Total Property. In the event.%:s~ecific easements are required by any provider of utilities to any Owner, the Owner of the property to be burdened by''ai'iy~such easement shall cooperate in the execution and - deliyery of any instruments reasonably necessary to grant and evidence such easement. Each Owner shall install, maintain, ;'operate, repair, replace and renew any and all of its utility _ ~ihe:s and related facilities serving, in whole or in part, such _ -~..~=.owner's Property; it being specifically agreed and understood `'~thst it shall be the sole obligation of the Owner benefitting ~~'from such easement to restore and replace to its previous `'.,condition any part of the Property damaged as a result of the - `~ ``- :,•exercise by any such Owner of any of its easement rights set ~ ~;;.' :' forth herein, and to minimize to the extent reasonably possible -" ~ any interference in the normal business operations conducted on the Property caused by the exercise of such easement rights by '~ any such Owner. The foregoing to the contrary notwithstanding, any easement established pursuant to this Paragraph 3 shall cease and be null and void if not utilized in the operation of utility lines, conduits or facilities for a period of five (5) - consecutive years. 4. pl:ainaae. The Property shall be subject to a perpetual non-exclusive easement for the drainage of surface waters either by natural flow or through pipes or otherwise to detention or retention ponds in accordance with the Site Plan. 5. Payment of Taxes. Assessmentsand Governmental ~gositions. Each Owner shall pay any and all ad valorem taxe assessments and governmental impositions accruing on its Parcel(s). -2- ! ~ _ ~~st ~. Availably PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 9957 PG 1939 .. 1. I :......... I . , 6. Maintenance. Each Otaner shall maintain its Parcel(s), i including the improvements;°and any easement areas located thereon, in good condi.~,iorij:_and repair at its sole cost and expense. 7 . Tndemni f i cat,~~ori .and Li abi liter Tn$urance. Each Owner shall indemnify and..~ia~d~harmless each other Owner from and against any claim.csr'loss by reason of any accident or damage to any person or prop@rty'happening on or about each such Owner's Property; provided, fiowever, that the foregoing indemnification shall not apply~to.:.claims or losses arising from the gross j negligence or`tai3.~u:i act or omission of any Owner, its employees, agents, contractprs, suppliers, concessionaires,, tenants, occupants, l,.essees, licensees, customers, visitors, and invitees, ` or arising;:byr"~e~son of acts or omissions which are excluded from standard pub3c;~liability and property damage insurance policies ~ as the sa-me'~-exist from time to time. Each Parcel Owner shall carry at"~ts`~`EOSt public liability insurance coverage on its ' improvecl,pr.operty with a contractual liability on the policy issued".13y~~~..axi insurance company in good standing and qualified to transact,business in Florida, stipulating limits of not less than $1,00(},OOb'for an accident affecting any one person, or not less thari;~;S2-, 000, 000 for an accident affecting more than one person andi'$`5'O.Q; 000 for property damage. ~,``' ,.~. ucactr; ntPrl Uses of P operty. No part of the Property ~shaf>l'be used for the purpose of conducting therein any illegal ~,or,:=unlawful activities. No Parcel shall be used as or for: ~ :~'`'~.~ :~~:amusement park; carnival; trailers; mobile homes; lumber-yard; ~.:;,:: -~--~.~ea-market; massage parlor; any club or bar serving alcoholic ~ ~=:-beverages in which nude or semi-nude dancing is permitted; or for - ~.'the sale or display of "adult" books and magazines or ';'pornographic materials. ~ :: .' 9. Sianacte. Any and all signs located on any Parcel, or any portion thereof, shall be in compliance with all state and local laws and ordinances, and shall not interfere with the ingress, egress, passage or use of any of the other Parcels, or with any entrances or exits located on the Property. i 10. No Joint Venture. Nothing contained in this i Declaration shall be construed to make any Owner subject hereto partners or joint venturers or to render any of said parties liable for the debts or obligations of the other, except expressly provided herein. i 11. Estogc~el Certificates. Each Owner agrees from time to time within twenty (20) days following receipt of notice from any other Owner, to execute and deliver to such other Owner a certificate for the use of the addressee, whether such addressee is a prospective buyer, lessee or mortgagee of such party, :~ - -3- • ~ ~. stating (i) that .~ and effect, or if and effect as mod or not to the bes" any respect under such default; and any notice of ,.ari''1 Declaration and ii copy of each ~ucl ~i'h•~:peclaration is unmodified and full force adified that this Declaration is in full force `•~ed.• and stating the modification; (ii) whether (::... af...zts knowledge, any party is in default in .. •. ~. :his Declaration, and if in default, specifying "}) whether such party has given or received :stared default given in accordance with this so, attaching a true, correct and complete otice given and received. 12. De a~i of Parti - Unless otherwise provided in this Declaratiog,;rio:..party shall be deemed to be in default hereunder until such`pairty shall have been given written notice describing the nature"'o~;~`such default, and within thirty (30) days after the receipt='of~'such notice, shall have failed to cure such default, or if;:sueh default cannot reasonably be cured within said thirty -•.; (30) ..days;; to commence to cure such default and thereafter to proceeci:""cl~iligently to complete the curing of such default as soon `:.~ as go~s':i~ile, utilizing all reasonable means to effectuate and expeelite' the curing of same. ~.I ~_,..~,13. Easements.. Restrictions and Agreements. The easements, '~j ;:xestrictions, rights, obligations and liabilities created hereby, _ ~tYr~.ess otherwise specifically stated herein, shall be perpetual "~to the extent permitted by law. 14. Cos~,~nd~',xpense. Wherever it is provided in this `: beclaration that Owner is to perform certain obligations, those ;i ,obligations shall be performed by said Owner without cost or 1 .... ~ expense to any other Owner, except where otherwise expressly • .I ", ... provided. :~.~"..."~'~` 15. Notices. Any notice, approval, consent, demand or election required or permitted to be given or served, pursuant to this Declaration shall be deemed given or served in accordance with the provisions hereof if delivered personally or by courier service or mailed by United Stated registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, properly addressed to the last known address of the party to whom such communication is to be sent. Any such communication to Declarant should be addressed as follows: If to Declarant: 2026 Powers Ferry Road Suite 250 Atlanta, GA 30339 The effective date of each notice, approval, consent, demand or election shall be the date the same is delivered personally or by courier, or deposited in the United States mail in the manner above provided. Any owner may change its address for the service of notices, approvals, consents, demands or elections hereunder -4- ~,: - ~" 9 n .: ~ sr c.0 Y J voila PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. .. OFF.REC.BK 9957 PG 1941 ~ by delivering written,:not3.ce~of said change to each other Owner I. in the manner above spe~i~.fied, ten (l0) days prior to the ~. ~ effective date of sa.ct•,:phange in address. I 16. Headings nd=CaAtians. The Paragraph headings or captions appearin.g'•'in,..:tliis Declaration are for convenience only, are not a part o~ a`h~ Declaration, and are not to be considered in interpreting this~peclaration. ;. ~- - I7. Modification. No modification of this Declaration shall be effebtiv~;unless made in writing and duly executed by all Owners of°th~e -property. 18. ~iidirig Agreement. All of the provisions of this Declarati.bn...`sh~ll be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit i of the Ocwl~e~s,;,bf the Property and their respective heirs, successbxs,~~uccessors-in-title, legal representatives and permitteri ~cassigns. -~.9:~.~;"'~`lorida Law. This Declaration has been made under the laws,at•,the State of Florida, and said laws shall control the interpretation and enforcement hereof. !'.`.`,; `~2fl. Remedies Cumulative. Except as otherwise expressly °°--~~=: ]~;~.m%ted by the terms of this Declaration, all rights, powers and j`°' ;: privileges conferred hereunder shall be cumulative and in I:"::`~. ~,add3tion to those other rights, powers and remedies available at °~_.Ta~a or in equity. All such rights, powers and remedies may be `~=:~Xercised separately or at once, and no exercise of any right, ~':~ . j ~ power or remedy shall be construed to be an election of remedies ~..or shall preclude the future exercises of any or all other l::.~. _•~rights, powers and remedies granted hereunder or available at law or in equity. - ' 21. No Waiver. Neither the failure of any Owner to _ exercise any power given such Owner hereunder or to insist upon _ strict compliance by any other Owner of its obligations hereunder, nor any custom or practice of any Owner at variance with the terms hereof, shall constitute a waiver of any Owner's rightEto.demand exact compliance with the terms hereof. _.i ~' i .. 22. m;mP. Time~is of the essence of this Declaration. 23. Covenants Running with the Land. All of the covenants, agreement, conditions and restrictions set forth in this Declaration are intended to be, and shall be, construed as covenants running with the land, binding upon, inuring to the benefit of and enforceable by the respective Owners. 24. 8everability. If any provisions, or portion thereof, of this Declaration, or the application thereof to any persons or -5- 4 i '1 :" ) e .. .. _.. j ,. j .,~', .~ '.1 _ :± ~., ~-j i ~:'~ ,f ~~. `n Florida limited partnership, who is personally known to me or who has produced , as identification and he is the person described in and who executed the foregoing Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Restrictions, and he acknowledged then and there before me that he executed the same as such general partner on behalf of said Corporation for the purposes therein expressed; and that said Declaration is the act and deed of said Corporation. / WITNESS my hand and official seal this (p day of January, 1998. Name ~7 "2~ Notary Public My Commission Expires: _(_ R. CARLTCN WARD ?'~ State of Flottda tAy Comm. Ems. Feb,18,18~ Comm. N CC 333408 .~ .~~.ASni.~a..,: , circumstances shall the remainder of th provisions, or port shall not be affect Declaration shall'.b Est ~o~Y: °.:. ;Av~~~ . PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. - OFF.REC_BK 9957 PG 1942 `to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, :s Declaration, or the application of such ~an_.thereof, to any person or circumstances :d~;thereby and each provision of this "valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law,;" ; --' IN WITNE88;,i~E22EOF, the Declarant has caused this instrument to be signed under seal by its duly authorized signatories, as of the date fixst above written. The Clearwater Group, Ltd., A Florida Limited Partnership, by BBR Properties, Inc., a -_ _ Georgia corporation, general partner. :GOR~'.OAATE ~ SEAL -. By; (SEAL) obert N. Hat eld; Jr. -" Its: President ' STATE OF FLORIDA .... •, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day personally appeared before ' ~ me, an officer duly authorized to take acknowledgements, ROBERT ,. A. HATFIELD, JR., as President of BBR Properties, Inc., a Georgia corporation, general partner of THE CLEARWATER GROUP, INC., a ':. ~.": ~.;` •; ~~~,, E`: ' _. ..: ~ . ' F. _ .~. . , _.. . r,~ :.. .: . . ~:. ._ , '. ~t~.. .~y _........ _.--.~....-_ Available PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 9957 PG 2943 A parcel of land lying wt~F;irl Lhe NW 1/9 of Section 22, 9'ownship 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, being a portion of shat certain property described as Parcel 1 !n Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 3747, page 379 together with a portion of that certain property described ae Parcel 5 lrr E'xecutor's Deed recorded in OfficiaT.,Recorda Book 3396, page 1125, both of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida•„'being rnot•e particularly described as follows: Commence at the Norc1eas[ boundary corner of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, 't'ownship 29 South, Range;T5,.,•Ee~.t, Pinellas County, Florida, said NorClteast boundary corner being S 89°03. 25'k-. L-,`•_,(~being the basis of bearings for this description) 2655 .2a feet from the NorttiweaC:-,bOUndary corner of said Norttrwest 1/9 of Section 221 thence S 00°19'29° E „a~ong`;the East boundary line of said Northwest 1/9 of Section 22, for 694.30 feet,}-..Clients leaving said East boundary line of the Northwest 1/9 of Section 22, N 84°07.']5.°•,.W' along the easterly extension of the Souttt boundary line of that. certain prcp~rrjr. deacribed as Parcel 5 in E'xecutor's Deed recorded in Official Records Book 3396,.:~,ptige='1125, same also being [IlE Easterly extension of the North boundary line of;that:..certain property deacribed as Pat•cel 1 in Warranty Deed recorded in Offic181:Fteco2•da Book 3797, page 374, both of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida;•'for'''50.01 feet to the Southeast boundary corner of said certain property desct.lEted`Sn Official Records Dook 3396, page 1125, same also being the point of inteipe~ripn with tha west right:-of-way line of. Missouri Avenue (Sl'aee Road S-59S-A), sar~ea2eo being the Point oC Daglnningr cl-nnca conelnuu N U7"uv'34" w, clung suirt Sputti'bo-ind~ry of that certain property described in Official Records Book 3396, page id25,-same 1 d being said Easterly extension of the North boundary line of that 'aeitai:n property deacribed in Official 12ecords Book 3747, page 374, for 99.99 feet to ;'.the-•NOrtheast boundary corner of said certain property described in Official Records •'~I~ooR:3797, page 3791 thence leaving said South boundary line of that certain property --,described 1n Official Records Rook 3396, page 1125, S 00°19'29" E, along the East '..t~oundary line of said certain property described irr Official Records Dook 3797, page ,,-]79, for 1.30 feet to the Southeast boundary corner of said certain property described -in Official Records Book 3797, page 374; thence N 09°95'01" W, along the South boundary line of Bald certain property deact•il~ed in Official Itecords tlook 3797, page ]74, for 103.98 feet; thence leaving said Soutlr boundary line of that r:ertain pruherty described in OEPicial Records Dook 3797, page 3'19, N UU°13'39° W, f.or 25U.UU feet; cttenee S 89°49' 33" E, for 203.02 feet to rite point of inceraection witt- aforesaid West right-of-way line of Missouri Avenue] thence S UO°19'29" E, along said West right-of-way line of Missouri Avenue, same also being a line 50.00 feet West of and i parallel with aforesaid East boundary line of the Norttrwest i/9 if Section 22, for 250.05 feet to the Point of Beginning. OUTPARCEI, .2 r s"` '°~ ''~ A parcel ofiland lying within the Southwest 1/4 of Section 15, '1'ownehip 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, being a portion of that certain property descibed as Parcel 5 in that certain Executor's Deed recorded in Official Records Dook 3396, page 1125, of the Publle Itecords of Pinellas County, !'lorida, being more particulary deacribed as follows: Commence at the Southeast boundary corner of fire Soutitweat 1/9 of Section 1S, 'POwnslrip 29 South, Rarige 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, said Southeast boundary corner being S 89°03'29" S'I, (being the basis of bearings for this descripeion) 2655.29 feet from the Southwest boundary corner of said Southwest i/9 of Section 15; thence N 00°15'59" E, along the Easc boundary line of said Southwest 1/9 of Section 15, for 909.63 feet! thence leaving said East boundary line of ctre Southwest 1/9 of Section Page 2 of 2 ,. . _. . s• i _. ~. i . . -: ~. .. f sr ~r ~'i~.'r4~ "'~g'~?•~i?~' ~:-fi "P ~`iliiv'~•'~~' ~~ (.~.' r-r.: .' 'I ~ 4'S .(nd r'".Yg.7'~ 'F i,J,, ~ T(.. ~-~ t7,~, '+ ~ ` i~~''Y~~`tii:~P~ix { ~;'ti ~ } t 7 i. ~uk v'~'y fir'' ;~~~ I" c#~~~`~?, L'k `~~ys~k`FFt as ~ie '~f-r y t l r t i iy . ~ x.k, ~ Diu ~>~ v X19 'F.u~~t~' tt~t~ ~ t4tF4~fi~ 6 Sc ° rc.,~l~ 2~ ~{: r J- ')y~~-ti~?(Y1t{,y?i~'F? r4 ~`2~}~~S '~',. ,j Mt;~•a sa~y:''i1~T'D •, -\12. is #'.~ y nth' ~~i.. .~ ... _ ..... .- .... .,... ... ~ _ ........ i,.. .I....(A-..~::--~.aa•...itl-=:SRa.Liln.:{.krl:c:.f.~iL.._~ i ~aLL.: ~ .f'Ir'~111.':4.1 .. h.....~r_..~., c._ a ~..._-,.-,_ I ~, Best Cody _" ., •' ' Available PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. -. ~:...~._., OFF.I3EC.BR 9957 PG 1 .. _ .. ._ "~ 15, N 89°52'99" W, for 52.96 fe~t,to the point of tnteraection with the Weat - ~ right-of-way 21ne of Miasouri~"Av~f-ue Soutli (State Road S-595-A) as described in '~+,' Official Records Book 3067, page,,~21 of the Pub11e Records of Pinellas County, Plorida, same also being thePOi.nt oP Beginning; thence leaving said West right-of-way line of Missouri Avenue South;...continue N 85°52'44" W, for 176.1] feet; thence N 00°13.34" E, for 309.09 ~eeC.;Ci~ the point of intersection witit the South right-of-way line of Druid Road; thence S.,:>19'°01'20" L, along said South right-of-way line of Druid -Road, same also being a li'ne,,.33.0O feet South of and parallel to the Norcti boundary ~~;~~ 11ne of the Southeast i/4 of [he Southwest 1/9 of said Seecion 15, for 146.96 Peet co the point of interaecc~on.wlch aforesaid West right-of-way 11ne of Missouri Avenue South, as described l~ $foresaid Official Records gook 3067, page 521; thence S _ 39°32'26" L, along:aaid..,Weet r19hc-of-way line oP Missouri Avenue South, for 39,04 _ Peet; thence S 19°39',52'"'E, continuing along said West right-oP-way lips of Missouri +~.1 Avenue South, Por.3~i:b5~'Peet; thence leaving said West right-of-way line of Missouri Avenue South, afl d"escr`ibed in aforesaid Official Records IIook 3067, page 521, S - 00°15.59° W, a1an~.,c-te~ West right-of-way line of Missouri Avenue South, same also being a line 5O..4O•feet Weet of and parallel with aforesaid Cast boundary line of the Southwest 1/4s~f ~e~cion 15, for 217.00 feeL•; thence S OS°59'39° W, along said Weat right-of-way'-.kirid of Missouri Avenue South, as described in aforesaid Official Records _ Dook 3067,;-;page:; 521, for 29.67 feet to the Point of Beginning. r. " `I' END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION ,. TI`7 .:J .... 4C092539 pBp 01-08-1998 16:07:38 ' DCL3CLERRUAiEROGROUP LTD - :;' ~ ~'~ ~ RECORD FEES __ .. PIOD TRU6T FUND 9 54.00 ;i 10 _ f.50 CHARGE RMOUNTTOTAL: f4.50 f4.50 9 .~ y ;.1 4C09@540 NBP 01-08-1998 16:08:09 01 DCL-CLEARNRTER GROUP LTD RECORDING 1 f37.50 CHECK AMT.TENDfRED: f37.50 CHANGE: ;, 00 Pays 2 of 2 ' - - ~ - ~ f i f j C 1 . ~ ~' ~ Yy +ty 1~,'~~"` i i M~z ya ~ ~ ~ 4~\ cf'~; .1 ~ - ~ J fr _ S 1 iS 1~ 1~r~ ~F~ 4 S'r'i, 'xit a.~i„[£ x ) cl r C f r __ .. .. ..?.n-..~..~.-A- r3, .1cx~a0s~w.,r. i3-..r /: ~_.-ss: .' .al~-. .. ,~. E :" - k _-~ L, _::.1 c(c ::~ ~~~, f.~41^ ~~ ~~:_~' i;•: t 7_,;: p~1 ict~S.;"~'~" LL' RC'eF[!' I ~~,, 3> ~ !E ~~ •~ r! la 6-~ ~~ "~ ~•i . ~. ~~ j iii ~!i ~...., III...'-... j!E 1 ~ i ~~ i 9 6 ' i i{ ~' +.r I ! IJ'f f ~ ' t if1e6 i I ~ Itj(I;,r~ .~ j ia..j ~ ~' 1 I' f {!f ~ 11l i jl~i I t fj Ir ~ i~l~ t { t o rr; li i=` ~i 1{,(•~;j ~ It .1~ tl ~~! .t~, . li . ~'~ i!j It I ~ ~ 11 ~f1i3 d 1 t . l~ijflio ~i~ , :I, i ~; , 1 +~ ~ {, ; sr { ~ i ~~ I' ~ 4 1'~ ' :f { +ffi a it ~ j ~'~ ~~ ~ ~ { Ijt. rr ii~l Ir l l _ r i i [ f . ii~,i~i~ fii~1!I I.= ;;j. ~ I R ;iiii ; ~ - itiiia i~i, ~ ... ATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRAN SPORTATION STORM SEWER TABULATION FORM 'ROJECT N0. ~~~~'Ss"'`~~` ~ ~''"~ ~`~°'d~ ROAD SHEET N0. rni it,rrv ~w.1~4~ Z .. ~ DRAINAGE AREA (ACRESI z ~ z z ,.~~~. ~ . • . _ tiT ELEV. OF H.G. _ OF_ ~ in in z CROWN ELEV ZO W ~ ~ ~- C- ~' ` ~ Z o ~ ~ .. w~ Ja ` a w , ~ w NE FREQUENCY R YR ~ v " n= 012 CONC FLOWLINE ELEV PIPE w o ~ C= p ~ 3C ~ ,., o ~ ~ ~ z ,~ z ~ ~ ~ .. F , o ~ o ~ ~ a ~ z ? 4. . . . & CULV : w ~ ~- >- n =424" CORR. METAL PIPE 7 r W ~ C~ C= a I U m -- oo ~- ~~ ~- Z J a ~'~~ ~ J W , ~ ~ ~ WO Wp JW ~'"' W U U D W W - >- z w I N w ~~ w ~~ W ~-- o fLZ 3 Z -~ ~ n. w o w a ~. ~ o o a p, z 3 ~ 2Z REMARKS oy 2~ IS 0 3 ~II G a z2 I ~ '' o, i3 i,~ 1 • ~ y . ~ . , f Z 0,30 0.53 ®,5~ o.id l ~S b. I b Q, i~ 0, 05 1 S 3 S ) 6,5(; L~,SS ~~ ~ ~,o~ 1, 3, S ~ , ~, tg of ~~ l~ ~ D 3 13 ~ ~ ~~ S ~ ~ ,; C.ls 25 y,S ~ ; ~ • ~ f~O~ ' n-F ~.s.~,ws ~~~ 7 1 ~9 09 1 6r~ c';33 3,~ ~,~ ~s ~o ~~~1%,~ 1 , ~,0 , 1~.~ ~/~T AT ir~JrCC YIZr,:~,1 ~ . ;~. c43; ~' f ~' d'i V ~~.~ y ~ t N U ~ t;.trrl : I ~~.~ua ~ a~,r ,~ ~' wT s.1~. r ``~Sr , ~~ . ,- ~ `%iQ-Cabrera € s ~,, : ~:, : ~„ ,. . . , a~ ~ r ' ~? - ,: ., i r i D ", JRIGINAL r ~. _.~. ,,~ _ _ - __ _. _.._ _._ _ - -- -- -r- ,.. ~'l ~lAN1~tN~ ne v C;.~, .' . ~~~ 3t~CS~ :;;~~~.; ~. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRAN SPORTATION B.I. No. STORM SEWER TABULATION FORM DATE 7 Z °S PROJECT N0. ~i~~~'SS~~` ~~-r`~~s°~°~ ROAD , ~;.._ri ~ n - _ ,.,,d ,.,~. SHEET N0. LOCATION o Z z ~ A DRAINA REA (AC GE RES) w~ z z - vvun I 1 ~ _.,- ~ ~ ELEV. OF H.G. --- - OF_,_,_ ~, ~,' 0 S z CROWN ELEV ZON OF w ~ w ~ ~ ~ _ C= ~ • 9 a ~ Z zo ~ a w ~ .. a w -. a w o ~' ~ ~' , n. w E FREQUENCY YR ,. ~ v n= 012 CONC PIPE & FLOWLINE ELE UPPER END -_- ~ o~ o x C- ~ - -3~ o~ ~~ , Z ``" w Z ~- -- ~ .- ~Z~ o ~ ~aE-- z w ~ . . V. CULVERT , >- } n ;•0~4' CORR. METAL PIPE ~ w , ~ ~ ~ w~ ~~ W a F, c~ Z C= ~ a I U " y o 0 0 o v~ w w o ~' cr .. J w . ~ ~ W p W p J W F- F- f' 0 ~ ~W W ~ STATION DIST S v~i ~v~, ~ ~ ~ ~ wQ ~~ w~ ~N z ~ ~ Z 3Z - o Q ~w ow ~~- a o w a ° cn ' D. z 3 ~. 22 " 'REMARKS d q 2~ ~S 0 3 ~fl d 22 0 l ~ ~, ©,r~ i17 1:~/ . r . n ( ;7 0,30 0.53 ©,5~ o.r~ j~~ o. ~b p, is ©, v5 r~ 3 ? S 6,sG x 55 ? ~ O,o~ ~: 3 5 ~ , , a ~ / , ,o~ 3~ CG:~ 0 3 I3 ~ ~ 7~ ~ ~ ~ c~.l~ 2.s Y,S . : , , ~ o. za ` 3 6 2 7 l ~ 09 l ~s ie erlsir~ G~: 3 %; 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j : ~:o , , ~~~ 1r/sT QT ~,-/,ce iZc~,,s~ °, ~ ern., ~~. eye _ w F n ~ ~ `4Yt, * >~t ~~ ~. 7~ ~a, i ~i d I/ Ctavio are a-. •: ~ ~ - FL PIE: Nv~rk,~663 ..'1A _ li y.. ~'„ ~ IY T '."....,.w... ~ ~~ZI ~ ~~~. c..~ ~` ~ ..i. ~ z~ o I ~.~°~tr~~._. _._.....:...i. _t. Ij I .... ... ..~,..~,.., ~Y., f.YY'Y'yv-Y y_v'v'Y"'yYV' 1 9-w..~,.Y..~,~.Y..v.Y Y..v^Y.Y_.,.,Y'yY"Y"Y'-`l•YY"~'..Y..v. ~. Y"~~, y Y, v~`.-y"r..X-'vr..5~'S' •v y y v"Y'1~ ... -~Y Y'v'Y y Y 1, i ~ ~: I }... ... J \.. / i . ~.. :, J. .~F,?xa:)n, 1. l..,.ti.. h ,~1,.h ~...~., A1.,,i~,h J..,.1, J. ,n, h 1. ,A, A A.. l„J..A l..i`.A_A..J..AJ,...LA.i...A,.hJ.,1.1..A./...hJ..n„1. -. n..h n.l., ~;• ~,... '> , 0 0 0 ~ o ~~~ 0 0 o e o i ,~ '~ ~; ... r ,.,.. ... • I` /~ ~\i ' I I ~ \~ I ~ ~ J ' -. I ~ / _ _ _ _ _ - ... ji 1 DRAIN D •••"1•• i 20,502 sq.ft. ~ i ry; i S 5 I \ IM M !i ~\ , I I i ~i ~) l i t `" DRAIN C ~ ~ i 8,721 sq.ft. ~ ~ I i •~. J. ~:'~ I ,,;: ~ 0 1 I !~ _ i~ 0 0 0 0 o e e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i... i.... I I, ii ~~ y \F ~ ~ i !' ji I I~ i I DRAIN B O j 10,212 sq.ft. j ~ i ~~ ~ I i ~, ;: a 0 0 0 0 0 ,; ,~, ii I ;~ ! sw1 s (i i r ~ I 1 fI ~ i 1 ~' I f i ' 1 ~ I , ~ '~ ~ ` ,` DRAIN A <~ ~f s:~;1 20,136 sq.ft. ~ ~ _ ~ ~I i I ??Iii. ` ~.(':fl e o o - ~ ~ SIP,, ,` l~ a, a; o e . I ~ I 0 0 0 ~~3 i ~'> ~sd.!t i . reM _ _ , i ... ...... .. ~. . >;' _ ~ c, n ...~r ,.. i ~_. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS 8,,. No, PORTATION PROJECT N0. ~ei~~SS~w°e STORM SEWER TABULATION FORM DATE 7 2 ~~S ~~r~~`~°~°~ ROAD ,.,..,,,~.,~:...r , SHEET N0. LOCATION z° w Z ~ DRAINA AREA (AC GE RES) Z ~ Z z^ z vvVl\ I 1 ~ ~ -.'~_~ ELEV. OF H.G. ,, ~-- - OF_ CROWN ELEV Z ~' ~ S w w .~ ~ .. a ° ~ o .. a a w o ~' , z n. w ONE FREQUENCY YR n= 012 CONC FLOWLINE EL PIPE ~ w ~ w w,., ~ o w , . EV, CULVERT UPPER END ~ O ~ o ~ C= ~ ~ 3C ~ c ~ Z w Z ~ " o = ~ z w ~ _ w ~ >- } n :.A~4' CORR. METAL PIPE ~ ~~ ~ z C= i U m.. O O ~ O O ~ t/f w ,,,~ a ~"' ~ .. J '~' ~ W O ~ i. , W Q J W F- H- F- O w w v ~ STATION DIST S c~n -~-v~i ~ ~ N ~,, ~~ w ~H z ~ ~Z ~w 3Z -~W ow ~w a o ° aa. J ~ " ' a D. Z 3 C~. 22 ' REMARKS ~~ ` Z~ ~S 0 3 til G z2 a 1 ~ '' p,r~ i,7 1.y . r . , ~ (2 ~ ' him ~r~ ~,.~-5. 0,3~ 0.53 0,5~ - " ~ b lb ~ o.i6 j j 73 . 5 o, 0,05 r~ 3 ~ 1 6,3~ o ~5 ~ ~ O,o~ 1. 3 5 , . r ,, ,, , i~ Z ~~ 1~~~ 0 3 13 x 7~ ~ °oE ~ O.IS z.s Y,S ~ ~ ~ ; ~ . ~ I~ r~o~-, 1 ~-~ ~a~,w~ 3 62 ~I ~9 1 o9 ~ o.za x,33 36 ~~ ~s ~ e~rs~; ~ ~ ~,0 , , 1~1 ~ .~ ~t i QT ~r /r~ c i~i.-,p . h ~ ~'a r ~ , , ~~ ~ {p EJ ~.. I :~ _~ ~ ~ ~,~-','F F \ `~ ~ N .... ,. a ~-~ ~~i ~~,`` }} +& ; ~ CI1 .._ ... ,. ;: v A. ~ ~ C. r 3~ Z 5 ~ ,~ . i v. ,i v J °~ L~r ~.:~J `~ .. ) i+; .~, + . 'K' . . , , , . ~ N . ~,, 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j~ ~..`..Y.V..Y.,~,..Y.v..Y ~~.Y., . ~... ~ ~ 1 ``~I i ~~ ~ J ~ ~ i ~ ~ j~ i ii ~ i~ r ~~ ~~ I' ~ i x i ~ t I I ~ ' I ~ i I 1 i') 1 , ,f., I i '.... ~. 1 i I i 1 ~: 1 I ~ I ~' ~ V i I 1 ~:.) i i~ ' rl ~ 1 i X 7: (.~ I i I ~ i' j ,r ~~ S i i) ~JA,i f ::M ... I __ ..............._OpIW......._ ~.....,., ............_ <i • LL CITY OF CLEARWATER ° earwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT '_ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM September O5, 2006 E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757 RE: Notification of Expiration of Development Order - FLD2005-07076 - 810 S MISSOURI AVE Dear Applicant This is a courtesy notification that the approvals under the above referenced Development Order for Case Number FLD2005-07076 will expire and become null and void unless an application for a building permit is made prior to: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 This is the only notice you will receive regarding the expiration of the above referenced case. If you have any questions, contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ~ ~ M ~ ~~~ Wayne ells Planner III Development Order Expiration - FLD200.5-07076 - 810 S A97SSOURI AVE h 4 "'~i • • ~~r~~~~ ~`` ~~ _ ~.a PLANNING DEPARTIvIENT j ~~ `~~~~y~ POST OFFICE BOX 474H, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 (~/~ `S~"S' MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 19, 2005 Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Development Order - FLD2005-07076 - 810 South Missouri Avenue Dear Mr. Armstrong: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 18, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings as part of a mixed use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (east along South Missouri Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to 9.7 feet (to dumpster enclosure) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 52.25 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional 15.5 feet for a decorative clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Road from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised to adequately screen from view from public streets and abutting properties the air conditioning condensers located on all four sides of the building; FRANK HII3BARD, MAYOR BILLJoNSON, VICE-MAYOR JoxN Doww, COI;NCIL~fE11I31:R HOYT HAMILTON, COL'NC'ILMEMI3ER CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCIIhfEMBER ~~EQUAI. EMPLOYMEN"I' AND AFFIRMA'T'IVE ACTION EMPLpYER~~ ,~ • • October 19, 2005 Armstrong -Page 2 3. That freestanding signage be designed as a monument-type, not exceeding six feet in height and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of--way to the proposed building) be placed underground; 5. That, in the event these units are to be sold, a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; and 8. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (October 18, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 1, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og_v_/depts/plannin>;. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerel ,, ~~ ~ G Michael elk, AIC Planning Director S:IPlnm~ing DepnrtmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnnctive or Finis{:ed ApplicntionslMissouri S 0810 Crossings nt Rennissance Sgunre (C) (?005) - ApprovedlMissoteri S 08/0 Development Order.doc • • Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [Jaynes@jpfirm.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 9:24 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ed Armstrong Subject: RE: FLD2005-07076 - 810 S. Missouri Avenue Yes, conditions are acceptable to applicant. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wellsc~myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 8:10 AM To: Jayne E. Sears Subject: FLD2005-07076 - 810 5. Missouri Avenue Jayne - To be on the Consent Agenda, the applicant must accept all of the conditions proposed in the Staff Report. Do you, as the representative for this case, accept the conditions set forth in the Staff Report? Wayne 1 o~ r~ LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW • 1~~ ®~ ~I.EARWA"I'ER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 5G2-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 September 30, 2005 Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-07076) Dear Mr. Armstrong: The Case No. FLD2005-07076 for Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings as part of a mixed use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (east along South Missouri Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to 9.7 feet (to dumpster enclosure) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 52.25 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional 15.5 feet for a decorative clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704. C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Road from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Lanuscapc rlugraili, iinuGi Luc YivviSiviiS vi Section 3-1202.G, for property located at 810 South Missouri Avenue, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on October 18, 2005. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, W ayne~ M. Wells, AICP Planner III S:IPlnnning DepnrhnentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIMissouri S 810 Crossings nt Renaissnnce Squnre (C) - l0.18.05 CDB - WWIMissouri 8/0 CDB Letter.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COA9i\11SSIONER HOYI' HAMILTON, VICF_ MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ~K~HITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBI3ARD, COA'f1~11$SION$R BILLJONSON, CO~'1~11SSI0\ER ~~EQUAI. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVIi ACTION E~IPLOYER~~ `~ ., _ ~ J ` RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS 1[ ~ ~ C~ l ~ D `' `! =~~ ~~ ; CLEARWATER RETAIL GROUP, LTD. ~ . I ~ i FLD2005-07076 - 810 S. MISSOURI AVE. ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ f , ;l -~-_. -~------.._- 43 ._• j t .i'; ~' Cii.~ ...: ... ~ . ... GENERAL ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located no further than 40-feet from Fire Hydrant. Response No. 1: Agreed. Proposed FDC, as shown is twenty-five feet from existing fire hydrant. Comment No. 2: 10-foot sanitary sewer easements shown on plan already exist. Response No. 2: Agreed. Label on Sheet 5 of 5 has been corrected to read "existing". Comment No. 3: Remove Sheets #6 and #7; retain and resubmit with building permit application. Response No. 3: Agreed. Sheets 6 & 7 have been deleted. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: Comment No. 1: Provide a recorded copy of across-access agreement with the owner of adjoining property to south such agreement to be b,nd:ng upon succg,sorJ .n tale to property Response No. 1: The perpetual cross easements are currently in place in accordance with the terms of the Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Restrictions, recorded in O.R. Book 9957, Page 1937, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, a copy of which is included with this resubmittal package. Comment No. 2: Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Response No. 1: Agreed. See revised Note #2 on Sheet 4. ORIGINAL • • Comment No. 1 Response No. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL: Comment No. 1 FIRE: Prior to CO: Condo plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County. Acknowledged. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. No Issues. Comment No. 1: ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RECEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE - 2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. Response No. 1: Agreed. Please refer to Fire Department Note 1 on Sheet 5. Comment No. 2: An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump. PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 2: Agreed. Please refer to Fire Department Note 6 on Sheet 5. Comment No. 3: An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. Emergency lighting should also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 3: Agreed. Please refer to Fire Department Note 7 on Sheet 5. Comment No. 4: Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a Fire Protection Engineer to assure adequate water supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Calculations due PRIOR TO PERMIT. Response No. 4: Agreed. Please refer to Fire Department Note 8 on Sheet 5. Comment No. 5: Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and _~_ ' ' ~ J ~ 21~~ `~ ~ ~ ,1~--- ,, ~ O R I G l ~ A i~ ~:. ~ . -;:: ~ svcs. • • shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 '/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 5: Agreed. Please refer to Fire Department Notes 3 and 4 on Sheet 5. Comment No. 6: Clearances of 7 '/z feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 6: Agreed. Please refer to Fire Department Note 4 on Sheet 5. Comment No. 7: Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Please Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 7: Comment No. 8: Response No. 8: Comment No. 9: Response No. 9: HARBOR MASTER: No Issues. LEGAL: No Issues. LAND RESOURCES: No Issues. Agreed. Please refer to Fire Department Note 9 on Sheet 5. Fire Alarm System in accordance with NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 shalt be installed, acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Agreed. Please refer to Fire Department Note 10 on Sheet 5. Show 30' turn radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress. PRIOR TO CDB. The access from the service road will have 30-foot radii. SAP 0 9 24~.i PLAN;., ~ ._.._----------- ' t.° . ~... .. .. 3 ORIGINAf. • • LANDSCAPING: Comment No. 1: Sheet L-1 -Alive oak tree is proposed in the terminal island on the south side of the western driveway to the service road. This island is impacted by the existing sanitary sewer line that runs directly below the tree location and the proposed drainage pipe. Change the proposed live oak for this island, and the "island" on the north side of this driveway, to two crape myrtle or ligustrum trees per island. Response No. 1: The live oaks were removed and replaced with two ligustrums. Comment No. 2: Sheet L-1 -Canopy-type shade trees, such as slash pines or live oaks, should not be planted within 20 feet of overhead power lines, such as along Missouri Avenue and Druid Road, to avoid necessary .future hatracking or severe pruning to avoid the overhead lines. Change out to accent trees or palms. Response No. 2: The slash pines were removed and replaced with accent trees. Comment No. 3: Sheet L-1 -Per Section 3-1202.8.1, accent trees are to be no more than 25% of the required trees (unless overhead lines are unavoidable) and two accent trees equal one shade tree. Palm trees are to be no more than 25% of the required trees and three palms (clustered) equal one shade tree. Based on the plan submitted, accent trees (26 crape myrtle and ligustrum trees) represent 58% of the required trees, which exceeds the maximum 25%. Revise. Response No. 3: Due to overhead lines and the existing sanitary sewer line, the proposed accent frees exceed the maximum 25 o. Comment No. 4: Sheet L-1 - Section 3-1202.E.2 requires a foundation landscape area five feet in width, comprising of trees, shrubs and ground cover (see this Section for specific requirements). The area long Missouri Avenue does not meet these requirements for width or plant materials. Revise. Suggestion: remove the sidewalk that runs in front of the pool and deadends into the Wendy's parcel. Response No. 4: Additional trees, shrubs and ground cover were added to the required five feet wide foundation landscape area. The sidewalk that runs in front of the pool was removed and additional landscape was added. ~! .; ~~ s~Q o ~ ~~~~ f. ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~________.___~_..___.1 • • Comment No. 5: Sheet L-1 -Code requires shade trees to be a minimum of 10 feet high and accent trees to be a minimum of eight feet high. Winged elm and ligustrum trees do not meet these requirements. Revise. Response No. 5: The winged elm and ligustrum trees were revised to meet the minimum height requirement. Comment No. 6: - Sheet L-1 -Revise plan to ensure it meets the following requirements of Section 3-1202.B.1 for shrubs (revise plant material list to include spacing): A) 18-24" in height when used in a perimeter buffer - planted every 36", (measured from the center of the shrub) providing a 100% continuous hedge which will be 36", high and 80% opaque 12 months from the time a certificate of occupancy is received (excluding drives and visibility triangles where applicable); B) 14-24" in height when used for interior -planted very 30"-36", respectively (measured from the center of the shrub) with a 3 gallon minimum. Response No. 6: The plant material list was revised to include spacing requirements. All proposed shrubs will comply with height and spacing requirements. Comment No. 7: Sheet L-1 -Show the visibility triangles on this plan and ensure Code requirements are met for landscape materials within the triangles. Response No. 7: Visibility triangles were added to the landscape plan, and code requirements are met for landscape material within the triangle. Comment No. 8: Describe HOW (in detail) the landscaping proposed has been designed as part of the architectural theme of the building. Otherwise, describe HOW the design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program are demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted under the minimum landscape standards. Response No. 8: See revised Comprehensive Landscape Program Application. J r ~~ Q I ` ---=----- --- -~- ~ Sit 0 ~ ~~~J ~- 5 ~.~._._._._ ..__ PLRt~ ~ t ~: ~ _ ..., t;tlY Cl.~ C~~ , ., .,.~ . _. . ORIGINA~- • PARKS AND RECREATION: • Comment No. 1: Recreation Land and Recreation Facility Impact Fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art . Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 1: Acknowledged STORMWATER: , No Issues. SOLID WASTE: Comment No. 1: Where will recycling carts be stored? Ideal next to enclosure. Show double dumpster enclosure to city specs on detail sheet. Response No. 1: Agreed. The dumpster has been changed to a single and the space next to it shall accommodate the recycling carts. See details on Sheet 3. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Recess columns from the end of parking stalls to improve maneuverability. Response No. 1: The proposed drive aisles are 24 ft. wide and most of the parking garage is one-way. We did not move the columns as maneuvering room is adequate and within code per the design. Movement of the columns would increase the free span of the post-tension slab above causing an increase in thickness and reinforcing to accommodate the higher loads. Comment No. 2: Vertical height clearance for parking garage must comply with current Florida Building Code. Section 406.2.2. Response No. 2: Agreed. Vertical clearance within the garage will comply with Florida Building Code Section 406.2.2 that requires 7'-0" clearance. A note has been added to Sheet 3. Comment No. 3: H/C parking architectural dimension sta l~ ~ ~'J -~: t space near Missouri Avenue driveway on site plan does not comply to the City's ~~(N(~~~~1~sl~(~~~ __ _~ ~ _...-.6.u.~~._ ., t... , CIF C:iF Ar~:,~tts~ci 1.~j ORIGINAi- • • Response No. 3: PLANNING: The handicap space along Missouri Avenue has been revised to meet the dimensional requirements. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Comment No. 1: Delineate and dimension all required perimeter landscape buffers (15 feet required along South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road; 10 feet required along south and west property lines). Response No. 1: All proposed perimeter landscape buffers have been dimensioned. Please refer to Sheet 3. Comment No. 2: Driveway to the service road on the west side at 40 feet in width is excessive. Reduce to no more than 30 feet in width. Response No. 2: Agreed. The drive has been reduced to 30 ft. in width. Brian needs redesign for landscape plan. Comment No. 3: The proposal indicates a setback of 4.5 feet in the southwest and southeast corners of the site, which is a setback reduction from five feet and also represents a reduction to the required landscape buffer of 10 feet. Increase to a minimum of five feet by reducing the width of the terminal island adjacent to the driveway to the service road to the west and to the driveway on S. Missouri Avenue and shifting the parking northward. Response No. 3: Agreed. The perimeter buffer has been revised to 5 feet as requested. Please refer to Sheet 3. Comment No. 4: Sheet 3/7 -How does one access the pump room on the southeast corner of the building, since there is no sidewalk shown? Response No. 4 Comment No. 5: A sidewalk to the pool deck has been added. Please refer to Sheet 3. What type of fence is proposed around the pool (solid, open wrought iron style...)? ~ ~ fr `_____------ _. ORIGINAL. • • Response No. 5: The fence around the pool- is to be an aluminum picket fence with masonry pilasters with stucco finish to comply with the applicable swimming pool code. Comment No. 6: Architectural site plan and garage level plan indicates the location of ground-level a/c units. Four of these a/c units are proposed within the pool -area. Correct? If not, relocate. Response No. 6: The four HVAC units within the pool fence enclosure have been relocated to the southeast corner of the building. Comment No. 7: Code requires all outside mechanical equipment (a/c units) to be completely screened on four sides by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation from view from public streets and abutting properties. If such screening is provided by means of a fence, gate, or wall, materials which are consistent with those used in the construction of and the architectural style of the principal building shall be utilized. Also, screening of the mechanical equipment is to be accomplished in a manner that does not interfere with the proper operation and/or maintenance of such equipment. Based on the location of the a/c units shown on the architectural site plan and the garage level plan, as well as the Landscape Plan Sheet L-1, it is unclear how this requirement is being met. Revise plans to show compliance. Response No. 7: The four HVAC units within the pool fence enclosure have been relocated to the southeast corner of the building. Proposed understory trees and shrubs, will screen this area. Comment No. 8: Provide the height of the clock tower from midpoint of the pitched roof (building height) to the top of the clock tower. Revise all appropriate elevations. Response No. 8: The additional dimension for the full height of the clock tower to the ridge has been added to the Missouri Avenue and Druid Avenue elevations, as well as to the site data table on the site plan. The narrative of the comprehensive infill application has been revised to request the additional height for decorative clock tower. Comment No. 9: Revise Exhibit A, Variance/Flexibility Request Checklist, for height to conform to the proposed height. Additionally, revise the justification for height, as there are NO ~`~~ I~~?~ J 1 --_--_____:~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ s I _ ~ s~~o~ ~~~~ r~~~ ~ oR~~~~A~ . ~, ..1 ~ :: ~rCS .:~ • • mechanical equipment contained within the roof structure (if there is any, please inform as to what equipment and where located, and why the roof needs to be this high for such mechanical equipment). Response No. 9: Please see revised Exhibit A to comprehensive infill. redevelopment application. Comment No. 10: Revise Exhibit A, Variance/Flexibility Request Checklist, for "setbacks" justification -the fact there is five feet of sod within the right-of-way back of the sidewalk is no justification for the proposed reduction of the required perimeter buffer on the subject property, as the area within the right-of-way could change tomorrow based on a public improvement to Druid Road. Response No. 10: Please see revised , Exhibit A to comprehensive infill redevelopment application. Comment No. 11: General Applicability criteria #6 response - Provide information as to how the existing Wendy's restaurant, which stays open late, with their commercial traffic, odors and noise associated to customers and deliveries, will have a minimal impact/effect on the proposed residential units on this property. , Response No. 11: Please see revised Exhibit C to comprehensive infill redevelopment application. Comment No. 12: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response -Provide written justification as to HOW this proposal "is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards." The important words are "otherwise impractical," as to why you cannot prepare a development proposal that meets the Code requirements. Response No. 12: Please see revised Exhibit D to comprehensive infill redevelopment application. See response to Criteria #7. Comment No. 13: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 response -Provide specific written justification as to HOW this proposed residential project is "compatible with adjacent land uses" that include commercial uses (such as the adjacent Wendy's restaurant). Include in the response how the introduction of residential use at this location, which was planraed~ for commercial use, will fit into the ~~ ~. i ~ ~..-- 1 " ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • • fabric of uses created with the overall "master plan" with commercial uses existing to the south of this parcel. Response No. 13: Please see revised Exhibit D to comprehensive infill redevelopment application. Comment No. 14: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response -Provide specific written justification as to HOW this proposed residential project "creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." This parcel was originally slated for commercial use. Address how this residential project fits in with the established commercial uses to the south, which will now be between residential projects, which was not the original vision. Remove discussion of increased value and taxes from this area (more appropriate in #2). (Note: any development on this parcel will increase the ad valorem tax roll.) Response No. 15: Please see revised Exhibit D to comprehensive infill redevelopment application. Comment No. 15: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 response -Height Request -Revise the justification for height, as there are NO mechanical equipment contained within the roof structure (if there is any, please inform as to what equipment and where located, and why the roof needs to be this high for mechanical equipment). Landscape Buffer Request -Address the reductions to the required buffer along Druid Road and along the south property line. Response No. 15: Please see revised Exhibit D to comprehensive infill redevelopment application. Comment No. 16: Sheet 3/7 -Remove Note on right side of sheet regarding prior approved buffer, as this was never built. This information may be appropriate in the written material. Response No. 16: The note has been removed. Comment No. 17: Response No. 17 All utilities on-site must be underground, including power and communication lines. Agreed. A note to that effect has been added to the General Notes on the cover sheet of the site plan. i ... ~ c.~ E: ,~ ~... _. , D C~~~~~~~~.;,r. 10 C~}~ ~ ~ L%~j ORIGINAL. • • Comment No. 18: Future sign at the intersection will need to be a monument- type sign a maximum of four feet in height and a sign area meeting Code requirements, designed with materials and colors consistent with that of the building. Response No. 18: Acknowledged. Comment No. 19: If these residential units are to be sold as condominiums, a condo plat must be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Response No. 19: Acknowledged. OTHER: No Comments. 9/8/2005 10:52 AM 46230.110132 #354550 v1 - CLWR RETAIL GROUP/Response to Comments FLD2005-07076 ~~ C~+ ~ n~~ „_. ~~ ORIGINAL • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 6:37 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07076, 810 S. Missouri Avenue Jayne - I think we forgot to talk about the Fire comment added at the September 1, 2005, DRC meeting. Note the first Planning comment has been amended to reflect the comments at the DRC meeting. I am attaching the Final comments for the September 1, 2005, DRC meeting for your assistance in providing the responses for the resubmittal. Wayne final 9.1.05 dre action agenda... .7 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 2:55 PM To: 'Cyndi Tarapani' Subject: RE: FLD 2005-07076, 810 S. Missouri Cyndi - The Functional Classification map in the Transportation Element of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan only identifies principal and minor arterials and collectors. It does not differentiate between minor or major collector streets. Section 3-1202.D.1 does differentiate between the landscape buffer requirements when located along a minor or major collector street. Since the Comprehensive Plan is silent, I have spoken to Paul Bertels, Traffic Operations Manager in the Engineering Department. He explained a primary difference between a minor and major collector is the volume of traffic. He determined Druid Road adjacent to the property in question to be a major collector. Your application should provide the justification for such reduction to the 15-foot wide landscape buffer required. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Cyndi Tarapani [mailto Sent: Tuesday, September 06, To: Wells, Wayne Cc: O Cabrera; Jaynes@jpfirm Subject: FLD 2005-07076, 810 ctarapani@fldesign.com] 2005 2:12 PM com S. Missouri Wayne-we are in the process of responding to the DRC comments. I have a question about Planning comment #1 regarding the required buffer on Druid Road. I believe that Druid Road is a minor collector in which the buffer would be required at 10 feet and we provide that. Can you please confirm this? This is a little unusual since the required setback is 15 feet adjacent to a road and we are requesting a variation to that requirement. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Vice President, Planning Florida Design Consultants 727-849-7588 ctarapani@fldesign.com Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 8:07 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07076, 810 S. Missouri Avenue Jayne - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the above referenced project, to be heard at 2:35 pm today. Wayne ~,~;~:; draft 9.1,05 dre action agenda... Clearwate CITY OFCL~RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM August 15, 2005 E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F1 33757 RE: FLD2005-07076 -- 810 S MISSOURI AVE -- Letter of Completeness Dear E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07076. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on September O1, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or W ayne. Wells@myclearwater. com. Sincerely yours, Wayne ells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-07076 - 8/0 S MISSOURI AVE • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 8:38 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07076, 810 S. Missouri Avenue Jayne - Attached is the Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. The original is being mailed. Wayne .+~ letter of ~mpleteness 8.15.05 JOH~ON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & B~NS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL L CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELI~ ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. 1LGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, 1R. SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. CARSON LEANNE LETIZE AN'GELINA E. I:IM MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA TROY J. PERDUE F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. AUDREY B. RAUCHWAY DARRYL R. R]CI-IARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS PHILIP M. SHASTEEN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER August 9, 2005 FILE No. 46230.110132 Via Hand Delivery Wayne M. Wells, AICP ~~ City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Auk Q ~ ~Q~S Clearwater, Florida 33756 PLANNING DEPQRT~Ef~IT Re: FLD2005-07076-810 S. Missouri Avenue CINOF CLEARWATEP Dear Wayne: This letter is in response to your letter of incompleteness dated August 7, 2005. The responses below relate to the numbered paragraphs in your letter. 1. The stormwater narrative has been added to the application as Exhibit "F." 2. We have submitted with this letter a revised flexible development application with original signature and initialed acknowledgment that a stormwater plan is included. 3. We have submitted with this letter revised landscape plans which depict the parking lot interior landscaping of 31 percent, where 12 percent is required by Code. 4. As per Cyndi Tarapani's discussion with you, the revised architectural plans will be submitted on August 10. The revised plans depict all outside mechanical equipment and screening. 5. We have submitted with this application a revised site plan that shows the structural overhangs on Sheets 3, 4 and 5. The revised landscape plan depicts the structural overhangs by dashed lines. The landscape architect has determined that there is no conflict between the overhangs and any of the proposed plant materials. CLEAR\VATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. 403 EAST MADISON STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1365 (ZIP 33757-1368) AA AA !s SUITE 400 CLEARN~ATER, FLORIDA 33756-5643 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P0S70FFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-I 100) TELEPHONE: (727) 4G I-I S I R TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TL•LECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 • JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL BL BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Wayne Wells August 9, 2005 Page 2 6. The revised site plan depicts the dimensions of proposed landscape buffers. 7. Attached are two copies of the last approved site plan for the project, which includes other parcels (the Sunshine Mall redevelopment). 8. We are submitting today a Comprehensive Landscape Program Application requesting the specific relief that you outlined in your letter. 9. The requested height of the building has not changed, but the building elevations are being revised as you requested and will be submitted on August 10. 10. Reduced elevations as requested will be submitted on August 10, as you have agreed. 11. Please see the revised site plan regarding the location of freestanding signage. 12. We have submitted with this letter a revised flexible development application with original signature and initialed acknowledgment that a traffic impact study is not required. Upon delivery of this letter, my legal assistant, Jayne Sears, will collate the revised documents and plans into the 14 application sets in the Planning office. Attached is a copy of the revised materials and original (signed and initialed) application for your review copy. Very truly yours, E DA/I rc encls. cc w/encls: Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Mr. Brooks Hatfield JOHNSON P-0PE, BOKOR, RUP/P~L~B~ RNS, LLP l/ ~ _ L~ E. D. Armstron I ~~~ A~lG 4 9 2QQ5 PLANNINGDEPARTMENT ORIGINAL cmoFC~wn~ ' LL ~ CITY OF CL~RWATER ~~ 0 ea,~Tater PLANNING DEPARTMENT '= MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING `'~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM August 07, 2005 E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F1 33757 RE: FLD2005-07076 -- 810 S MISSOURI AVE -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07076. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. 2. Acknowledgement on Page 4 of the application of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. 3. Depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas (Note 1: 12 percent of the vehicular use area is required to be provided; Note 2: There is a large discrepancy between the square footage of interior landscaping being provided on Sheet 1/7 and Sheet L-1.). 4. Show the location of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening. 5. Show on Sheets 3/7, 4/7, 5/7 and Sheet L-1 all structural overhangs (second through fourth floor extensions from the ground floor wall). 6. Delineate and dimension all required perimeter landscape buffers (15 feet required along South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road; five feet required along south and west property lines). 7. Provide in the narrative the conditions of the previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board). 8. Provide a completed Comprehensive Landscape Program application, stating the landscape requirements proposed to be modified or waived, with justification for such (Application appears at this point to include the following landscape reductions: a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet [to pavement], reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Road from 15 feet to 10 feet [to pavement and dumpster enclosure], a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 feet to 4.5 feet [to pavement], a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 feet to five feet [to pavement] and a reduction to the foundation landscaping from five feet to three feet [to pool deck]). Letter of /nconipleteness - FLD2005-07076 - 8/0 S MISSOURI AVE LL ~ CITY OF CL~RWATER ~~ o ear~vater PI:ANNING DEPARTMENT - MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM August 07, 2005 9. On the building elevations, provide the height of the building (appears to be a pitched roof, where the height is measured to the midpoint of the pitched roof) and the height of the clock tower from this roof midpoint. 10. Provide the Reduced Building Elevations -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/2 X 11) (black and white). 11. Show the location of any proposed freestanding signage with the proposed setback from property lines (details not necessary at this time, but the proposed location needs to be coordinated with other proposed site improvements and landscaping). 12. Acknowledgement on Page 6 of the application of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- andpost-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. Section 4-202 of the CommunityDevelopment Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, August 9, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or W ayne. W ells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, WaYn{e Wells Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD1005-07076 - 810 S MISSOURI AVE • :~ Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 9:26 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07076, 810 S. Missouri Avenue Jayne - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. Wayne letter of completeness 8.7.0. FAX COVER lO~IEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTli~ENT 100 5. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-465 To: FAX• ..~' ~ ' ~ to ~ ~ Phone• ~ ~ - ~ ~ 1 ~ FROM: ~.1,s Phone: S lv Z - 4~ O ~_ DATE:_ ~ I ~ 0S RE: ~~ Lco~ -0 7v 7_ ~c ~ld S. ~" li~3QWc: ~@.. MESSAGE: -• ~~:~; NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3 J ~~, M i Aug. 07 2005 09:32PM YOUR LOGO CityOfCiearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94418617 Aug. 07 09:31PM 01'38 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'i`'®VU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEBE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). JOH~ON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & B~NS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. CARSON LEANNE LETIZE ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A.R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE F. WALLACE POPE, IR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. AUDREY B. RAUCHWAY DARRYL R. RJCHARDS dRIGINAL PETER A. RIVELLIN[ DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS PHILIP M. SHASTEEN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEIIQBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER July 28, 2005 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Neil Thompson, Development Review Manager City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Dear Mr. Thompson: File rvo. 46230.110132 On behalf of my client, Clearwater Retail, Group, Ltd., I am pleased to submit this application for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project for the site located at 810 South Missouri Avenue. In recent discussions, Ms. Gina Clayton confirmed that this project would be considered as a Comprehensive Infill application due to the consistency of the proposed residential use with the surrounding residential master plan previously known as Sunshine Mall. We are not submitting a survey on this site; however we are submitting the recorded plat which identifies all of the site dimensions. In addition, there are no existing structures on the site to evaluate since the proposal is to build a new building with new site improvements. I believe that you have previously agreed that you would allow the substitution of the recorded plat in lieu of a survey. With regard to signs for the project, this submittal does not contain any sign proposals. We are aware of the need to submit the signs for staff level approval at a later date. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you should have any questions. Thank you for your consideration of this project. Since iy;,% ~~ C/ E.D. Armstrong III cc: Bob Hatfield, Hatfield Construction Ed Mazur, Florida Design Consultants Allison Utter, Anderson Lesniak Steve Lull, Parker Associates CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 91 I CHESTNUT ST. 403 EAST MADISON STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) SUITE 400 CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33756-5643 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-] 100) TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 ~ TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 ~l 5 iANTSINC Letter of Transmittal Attn: Neil Thompson Date: July 28, 2005 Development Review Manager City of Clearwater Planning Department Address: 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Job No: 2005-35-10.06 Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Renaissance Square Condominiums From: Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Co ies j Dat_c_ ? No. --- - - - - - - - - - _ Description 14 1. Ori final A lication 15 2. Site Plans 2 3. Colored Elevations -Full Size 15 4. Colored Elevations- Reduced Size 6 5. . Colored Landsca e Plans -Reduced Size 3 6. FDOT Storm Sewer Tabulation Form 1 7. A lication Fee These are Transmitted as Checked Below: ^ For Approval ^ For Your Signature ^ As Requested ^ Approved as noted ^ For Review and Comment ^ Other: Comments: For July 29, 2005 Application Deadline. Signed: Copy to: FLORgDA DESIGN CO NOL s pS~,ERS. FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 StaAcey Boulevard ~p 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 New Port Richey, Florida 34655 O R I G I N A L ® For your use ^ Returned for Revision r ;. ^ Please print name below and return via fax as having been received. File: 2005-35-10.06 :pcm K:\Clearwater Retail -Lots 8 & 9\LOT\thompson re application.dot If enclosures are not as noted, kindly inform us at once Phone: (727) 849-7588 -Fax: (727) 848-3648 CDB Meeting Date: October 18, 2005 • ORIGINAL Case Numbers: FLD2005-07076 Agenda Item: E8 Owner/Applicant: Clearwater Retail Group, Ltd. Representative: Mr. E. D. Armstrong III Esq. Johnson Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP Address: 810 South Missouri Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings as part of a mixed-use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (east along South Missouri Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to 9.7 feet (to dumpster enclosure) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 52.25 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional 15.5 feet for a decorative clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Road from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Commercial (C) District; Commercial General (CG) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 1.368 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (32 dwelling units) Staff Report -Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07076 -Page 1 of 8 • ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Commercial and Office Districts; Retail sales and offices LAND USES: East: Commercial District; Automobile service station (closed) South:- Commercial District; Restaurant, retail sales and attached dwellings West: Commercial District; Retention pond and attached dwellings CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area along Missouri Avenue north of Druid Road is developed commercially, as well as the east side of Missouri Avenue south of Druid Road. The west side of Missouri Avenue south of Druid Road is developed with attached dwellings where the prior Sunshine Mall was located. Two parcels south of the subject property are developed with a restaurant (Wendy's) and retail sales. ANAT.VCTC• Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.368 acres is located at the southwest corner of South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road. The site has 225 feet of frontage on South Missouri Avenue and 270 feet of frontage on Druid Road. The site is currently vacant, but was formerly developed commercially. This site was originally part of a Certified Site Plan approved by the Development Review Committee on March 12, 1998. The Community Development Board (CDB) at its July 17, 2001, meeting approved a Flexible Development application (FLD 01-O1-OS) for this site as a further amendment to the Certified Site Plan. Renaissance Square Apartments, Ltd., subsequently appealed the case to the Division of Administrative Hearings, which stayed the approval pending the outcome of that action. The appeal was withdrawn and the case was closed on February 27, 2002. The CDB approved a Flexible Development request (FL 02-02-06) on April 16, 2002, amending the Certified Site Plan to decrease the number of residential units on Parcel 4, increase the gross floor area of non-residential use on Parcels One and Five, replace a clubhouse with a parking lot on Parcel 3, replace a residential building with a 6 commercial building on Parcel 5, combine Parcels 2, 5 and SA into a unified Parcel 5 (consisting of Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10), and combine Parcels 4 and 4A into unified Parcel 4. These parcels are part of a larger development known as Renaissance Square (formally the Sunshine Mall). This site is Lot 10 and was originally approved for a CVS Pharmacy. Proposal: The proposal is to develop this site with attached dwellings to serve as part of the mixed-use project of Renaissance Square (formerly the Sunshine Mall). The project has been designed to be compatible with the existing residential structures contained within the overall master plan. The proposed residential building contains 32 dwelling units on three floors over ground level parking. The applicant must request approval of the proposed attached dwellings as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, since such use is not permitted in the Commercial District. The Cotmmercial General (CG) land use category permits attached dwellings at a Staff Report -Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07076 -Page 2 of 8 • ~ permitted density of 24 dwelling units per acre. Staff's support for this proposal is based on how this proposal fits into the previously approved mixed-use Certified Site Plan, where all of the residential development on the former Sunshine Mall property is also located in the Commercial District. Even though there is commercial development of a restaurant and retail sales to the south of this project, the development of this site residentially is compatible with the adjacent uses. From an access and site circulation standpoint, the proposal maintains the existing driveway location on South Missouri Avenue, as well as the existing driveway location to the service road to the west (which provides access to Druid Road for this site, the two commercial properties to the south and the residential projects farther south). The proposal also maintains the cross-access points with the adjacent Wendy's parking lot (which also ties in with the retail sales farther south). A total of 64 parking spaces are proposed, at a ratio of two spaces per unit. Twenty-one of the provided parking spaces are located outside of the building, whereas 43 spaces are located under the residential building. A drive from the front to the rear parking areas is located on the north side of the building. A double dumpster enclosure is proposed at the western terminus of this northern drive aisle, providing adequate trash truck access. The proposal. includes a reduction to the front (east along South Missouri Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to 9.7 feet (to dumpster enclosure). Similarly, the proposal includes a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Road from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement). The setback and buffer reductions to pavement along South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road are the same as or are greater than that indicated on the Certified Site Plan in 1998. The Wendy's site to the south provided afive-foot setback to pavement to the common property line with this site. The proposed setback and buffer reductions to this common property line, as well as to the west property line, are based on mirroring the pavement location as that on the Wendy's site. The residential building is located 16 feet from the south property line and 42 feet from the north property line (Druid Road). The requested flexibility in regard to required setbacks and to the buffer widths is justified by the benefits of an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area and the need to match the cross- access locations with the property to the south. The proposal includes significant landscaping of the site. There are no existing trees on the site worthy of preservation. Due to the existence of overhead utility lines within the rights-of--way of South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road, trees within the front perimeter buffers are restricted to understory type trees that will not grow to heights causing interference with the utility lines. Due to this circumstance, the percentage of accent and palm trees exceeds the normal 25 percent of such trees allowed. Code requires outside mechanical equipment to be screened from view from public streets and abutting properties. Air conditioning condensers are proposed to be located on the ground adjacent to all four sides of the building. While the landscape plan does not indicate Staff Report -Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07076 -Page 3 of 8 • the location of these condensers to coordinate their screening by hedges, the landscape plan should be amended prior to the issuance of any permits to adequately provide such screening. The proposed four-story building has been designed compatible in character with the residential buildings farther south within the Renaissance Square development, through the actual building design and the exterior building materials and colors. The proposal includes an increase to building height from 25 feet to 52.25 feet (to the midpoint of pitched roof), with an additional 15.5 feet for a decorative clock tower on the northeast corner of the building. The proposed building is similar or lower in height to the other residential buildings in the Renaissance Square development. The proposed clock tower is entirely decorative in nature, providing an identifying feature to this project and architectural interest. The second level will have 10 dwelling units and the clubroom, whereas the third and fourth levels will have 11 dwelling units per floor. The applicant is proposing a project sign at the intersection of South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road. While the design of the sign will occur later, the sign should not exceed six feet in height and should be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 704.C) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report -Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07076 -Page 4 of 8 • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-701.1 and 2-704 STANDARD' PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 32 dwelling units X DENSITY (24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE; 32 UNITS MAXIMUM) (a) IMPERVIOUS 0.76 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (0.95 LOT AREA (N/A) (b) 1.368 acres X LOT WIDTH (N/A) East (South Missouri Avenue): 225 X (b) feet North (Druid Road): 270 feet FRONT SETBACK East: 80 feet (to building); 10 feet (to X (25 feet) (c) pavement) North.: 42.4 feet (to building); 10 feet (to pavement) REAR SETBACK Corner lot (front setbacks along streets X (N/A and side setbacks otherwise) SIDE SETBACK West: S3 feet (to building); five feet X (10 feet) (c) (to existing pavement); 9.7 feet (to dumpster enclosure) South: Five feet (to pavement) HEIGHT (25 feet) (c) S2.2S feet (to midpoint of pitched X roof) with an additional 1S.S feet for a decorative clock tower PARKING SPACES 64 spaces X (1.5 spaces per unit; 48 s aces re uired) (c) (a) Based on the Commercial General land use category. (b) Since the use is not a permitted use within the Commercial District, no specific standard is set forth. (c) While no specific standards are set forth for attached dwellings, general standards for all minimum standard permitted uses was utilized. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report -Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD200S-07076 - Page S of 8 • • COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FT,EXTRTT,TTY (''RTTF,RIA (Section 2-704.C1: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting ro erties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise ermitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelo ment Project are com atible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for develo ment. 6. The design of the proposed. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the .immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for develo ment and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel ro osed for develo ment. C'(~MPT,TANCF, WTTH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-9131: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent ro erties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly im air the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Develo ment is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent ro erties. Staff Report -Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07076 -Page 6 of 8 • ~ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 1.368 acres is located at the southwest corner of South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road; 2. The site is currently vacant, but has previously been developed commercially; 3. The site was originally part of a Certified Site Plan, known as Renaissance Square, approved by the Development Review Committee on March 12, 1998, which was amixed- useredevelopment of the prior Sunshine Mall; 4. Much of the Renaissance Square project is for residential (attached dwellings) development, while the entire Renaissance Square project is zoned Commercial District; 5. This site was originally approved for a CVS Pharmacy; 6. The proposed 32 attached dwellings are not a permitted use within the Commercial District, requiring the processing of this request as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; 7. The Commercial General land use category permits attached dwellings at a permitted density of 24 dwelling units per acre; 8. The development of this site residentially is compatible with the adjacent uses; 9. Reductions to setbacks and landscape buffers are consistent with those setbacks and buffers previously approved under the Certified Site Plan for this site; 10. The proposed building is similar or lower in height to the other residential buildings in the Renaissance Square development; and 11. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive h1fi11 Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 1, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL for the Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings as part of a mixed-use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (east along South Missouri. Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to 9.7 feet (to dumpster enclosure) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 52.25 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional 15.5 feet for a decorative clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue from 15 Staff Report -Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07076 -Page 7 of 8 • • feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Road from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for the site at 81..0 South Missouri Avenue with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final. design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; . 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised to adequately screen from view from public streets and abutting properties the air conditioning condensers located on all four sides of the building; 3. That freestanding signage be designed as a monument-type, not exceeding six feet in height and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 4. That all. proposed utilities (from the right-of--way to the proposed building) be placed underground; 5. That, in the event these units are to be sold, a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That all Parks and Recreation. fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; and 8. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: /\Q Wayne .Wells, AICP, Planner IlI ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: IPlnnning DepnrhnentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cnsesl Up jor the next CDBIMissouri S 8/0 G•ossings at Rennissnnce Squnre (C) - 10.18.05 CDB - WWIMissour S 8/0 StnjjReport.rloc Staff Report -Community Development Board -October 18, 2005 Case FLD2005-07076 -Page 8 of 8 n 0 go 5 3 b ~ ~5~ a o ¢ a~o~ Q ~ a~ r ~ PARK S7 £ ~ ~ ~Q ~ PARK rc Sf Y ~ ~ R ~ ~'P ~ $ ~ PIE ~ ~ CE Sr . L7_Ir - ~ < - ^ r 6 i- ST u ~~' ~ u ~~~ ~F^ OSA ~ r \ D L___~ ~) COURT Sr SR. 651 GULF ST ~ yu D D ROC#RS Si ~ ~ ¢ a~oC @ w ~ TURNER ~ S7 ~~~~~~ PINE ¢ Sf ~ ~ ~~0 Drano a ~a WAY ~j po ¢ JgSMRE WAY b ~ ~ w OR ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ a E MM.NOIJA o ^ ~ ~ ~~3 w P ~ Inns Pw1N = Imus wrn ~ 3 o x to ,I~FORDS ~Z~11 $f ~3~ ~~ .. < g ~ ~.~T BARRY ST BMRY ~.~ TIiSCOIA ~--^ 5~T 11 3 ~ U u w > R~iON Wi Sf w 3 yd COQO ~ a t71 ~ w o ~ ~ ~20WNING r_1 u I r l 1 m~~~ Sf A S! u ~ GR. 488 LN(EVIEW RO s ~ 6 Q G Q • V Pfl ~ x w yi TS NORM/WDY PPRK DR U4KEYIEW ~ f~~l SOUTH ST o f >¢ g ~Y TAN 0~ ~ s o a ~ .. 3 > ~ m , SA7SVMA Z ~ D Si ~ h i ~= 3 flsv Y x ~ E ~ ~ ~ 3 $ E ~ ~ ~ ORANGE i KINGEY S S UME Sf ~ MiEf811N O ST ~ QUEEN ST ~ r URE YG QUEEN ~ ~ GI _ ~E ~ gifWS ~T Nrwy AUMA Location Map Owner. I Clearwater Retail Group, Ltd. I Case: FLD2005-0707b Site: 810 South Missouri Avenue Property Size(Acres): 1.3b8 PIN: 15/29/15/16530/0/0100 Atlas Page: 29bA ~ • J q , ~~~ i , +(], 1 •' ~ ~ • r- r T ; K f ft ' ~ ~ a ~ ~ ., YS ' - °~ Tf ~ ~ ! ~ ~ f ~, .~ . j '7 +K • 7 _;~~ ~ '~~ !"' ~ - ~ ~~ w ~. '~ ..i `y ~~~ . Owner. I CIE Site: $ 520 ~~ 1 700 ~ D2 ~ 2 ~13~.--.~z~ 05 a~ LEMBO C/R 1~~ ~~ ~ ~--~ L1 ~~ 1 I_ ~1 716 r--I 718 I I ~ I I 71 l rol N ~I R~ ~_ L-r ~ N I N ~ ~ _ .- I-- I f-N, I ^I , i r I ~ I ~ ~' I I I-~--~ ~ I ~ --- ~^`-t~ r--- L I I - N ~ ~ N 900 I_J r` /'\ / JASMINE WAY ~ / /~ / ~ ~ , i,~/ j V` / / i ~.~ .\ . ~ 901' -- ~ N N N N ~ ~ --~.~ i--"~ -r ~ _~ I ^ % \ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ r I ~ ~ i 912 5 r- , ~ ' ~ D ~I - : ; ! - \ \~, I I 918 I I __ `~~ l ' 922 I I --~ I --' ~ ,~ i l ~ ~ 1 ~ L r-i, r-I- j j i ~j ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ J ~ ;~ L ~ ~ / ( J ~ J ~I I----J 930 \ Ir / ~ h r 92 `-J _t . s - - ~ . - ~ ~ I - `'y\' 1110 ;' ~ r ;' ~ ----~ ~ ----~ f A(sNOLIA DR /~ \Ntii I 1 / I ~ j rl \ ~ ~~\ rl 1108 II i 1106 rl -- _ - = -z- ~ /.,,i i I r J I 1001 ~ ^ S--`~I r `-czv rz_ N r-.p~ r--~ f I ^ I ^ I I ^ I •- . ti I I ~_ ~ I I I L J- I \ ~ j I ~I i f104 I ~ t-_ ~~ r ~-- ~ ~---I \~ 111\ I I I _-J Zoning Map Owner. Clearwater Retail Group, Ltd. Case: FLD2005-07076 Site: 810 South Missouri Avenue Property 1.368 Size(Acres): PIN: 15/29/15/16530/000/0100 Atlas Page: 296A • • -t ~ ~--~ ~ ~ ~ ~--_I 624 819 - ~ 620 I ~ Attu e - I- ~~I ~ ~ ~ 01 r_, ,, 62~ehiclle , ~ -_ --- g n ~ ' ~ ; ; Restr~~ Repair_ _; ~ I -----~ I I , I ~ I I I >oz ~ 2 _ _,r I -' '!-L~ I I ~, ;Attached _ `-l _ _-_--- ;627 ~ ~ 1705 I; ~ ro7 LEMBO C/R PINE ST ~ ~~ ~ dwellings ~ Rc!t,ail „0 ~.~ I I ,-r~~ chef ---' L ~ Saps 712 r f '~lw ~°g ~ ` ~ y- -~ I ~ I ----, i - - t- ' ; - I_ ~ Attached ~ 7i9 7,6 r-~---- t - ~ - l~~ail >riec~ dwe lii~ ~~ ~ dwellings ; ~ ~ 112 i I 1¢ O des ~ ~~ t . ~ 4 Ret~ril ~ '-- J l dale ~ ~ ~ I ~ , , 't-~ ~,,N ~ :~~! «~ ; N~ ----- ~-- es --I --;~ DRU/D RD I-------- ~ W W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ a ca I ~ ~ I I ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ I I I ~_I- I `-i- j i - ~I ~ f ~_ ; r-~ ~- i I I ~ ; ~ 1 . > > _ 03 ~tttfi - D tac ed d elli gs '- % , .- ;' ,~ , ~ \,. Owr Sits 810 South Missouri Avenue FLD2005-07076 subject property with properties to the south Road Page 1 of 2 View looking south along S. Missouri Avenue from View looking southwest along Druid Road at View looking south at connection from subject View looking south at cross access to the west of View looking south at adjacent property (Wendy's and retail) near South Missouri Avenue View looking north at retail sales north of Druid Druid Road north of subject property 810 South Missouri Avenue FLD2005-07076 View looking west at cross access, retention pond and attached dwellings west of subject property - --r-~-- Page 2 of 2 View looking southeast at development on east side of S. Missouri Ave. south of Druid Rd. View looking northwest at offices on north side of View looking east at retail sales (credit union) on northeast corner of S. Missouri Ave. & Druid Rd. View looking southwest at attached dwellings farthE south of subject property along S. Missouri Ave. View looking southwest at attached dwellings farther south of subject property along S. Missouri Ave. ... ~' t' 1 r i:r.~ sr • • ~;~-i~~~`L-~`~ Conditions Associated With ``' ~ FLD2005-07076 ~~ ~ =~,~._ "~~~`~,' 810 S MISSOURI AVE .~.~.~ Landscape Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/31/2005 9/19/05 - WW Not Met Possibly include as a condition of approval for two trees per island. _ 8/31 /05 - W W Sheet L-1 -Alive oak tree is proposed in the terminal island on the south side of the western driveway to the service road. This island is impacted by the existing sanitary sewer line that runs directly below the tree location and the proposed drainage pipe. Change the proposed live oak for this island, and the "island" on the north side of this driveway, to two crape myrtle or ligustrum trees per island. 08/31/2005 Sheet L-1 -Per Section 3-1202.8.1, accent trees are to be no more than 25% of the required Not Met trees (unless overhead lines are unavoidable) and two accent trees equal one shade tree. Palm trees are to be no more than 25% of the required trees and three palms (clustered) equal one shade tree. Based on the plan submitted accent trees (26 crape myrtle and Iigustrum trees) represent 58% of the required trees, which exceeds the maximum 25%. Revise. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 08/18/2005 Recreation Land and Recreation Facility Impact Fees are due prior to issuance of building permits Not Met or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs frst. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/31 /2005 9/19/05 - W W Potentially include as a condition of approval. / 8/31 /05 - W W J Code requires all outside mechanical equipment (a/c units) to be completely screened on four sides by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation from view from public streets and abutting properties. If such screening is provided by means of a fence, gate, or wall, materials which are consistent with those used in the construction of and the architectural style of the principal building shall be utilized. Also, screening of the mechanical equipment is to be accomplished in a manner that does not interfere with the proper operation and/or maintenance of such equipment. Based on the location of the a/c units shown on the architectural site plan and the garage level plan, as well as the Landscape Plan Sheet L-1, it is unclear how this requirement is being met. Revise plans to show compliance. 09/01 /2005 19/19/05 - W W J Include as a condition of approval. 9/1/05 - WW All utilities on-site must be underground, including power and communication lines. 09/01 /2005 / 9/ 19/05 - W W J Include as a condition of approval. 9/1 /05 - W W Future sign at the intersection will need to be a monument-type sign a maximum of four feet in Not Met Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 10/11/2005 Page 1 of 2 • ~ FLD2005-07076 810 S MISSOURI AVE Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 height, and a sign area meeting Code requirements, designed with materials and colors consistent with that of the building. 09/01/2005 / 9/19/05 - WW Not Met J Include as a condition of approval. 9/1/05 - WW If these residential units are to be sold as condominiums, a condo plat must be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Print Date: 10/11/2005 CaseConditons Page 2 of 2 • Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 3:17 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-07076 - 810 Missouri Wayne, Engineering has completed review of subject resubmittal and updated Permit Plan. Approval conditions: Condo plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County prior to CO. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater. com • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 12:18 PM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Watkins, Sherry Sulaject; RE: FLD2005-07076 Sam - The parcel that we are dealing with is only the corner lot that is squarish, which is the smaller acreage. Could you revise the maps appropriately? Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 9:01 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2005-07076 I changed the property size from 1.368 to 3.587 « File: zone.doc » « File: location.doc » « File: future land use.doc » « File: FLD Map request form.doc » « File: existing.doc » « File: aerial.doc » Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 • • Welis, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 11:30 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Update on FLD #2005-07076 ~~ zone.doc location.doc FLD Map request existing.doc aerial.doc form.doc Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727)562-4769 • .7 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 9:05 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 810 South Missouri Avenue Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-07076 for the property at 810 South Missouri Avenue. I will bring over the paperwork. The plat that I will bring over you may keep (there is no survey). Thanks - Wayne FLD Map request form.doc a VVe'lls, Wayne `vyr From: Albee, Rick Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:09 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the October 18, 2005 CDB Sorry for the late response 1101 Ft Harrison- Conditions met and Permit Plan updated. 1770 Drew St- Conditions met and Permit Plan updated. 1100 Cleveland St- Some conditions met and others modified, Permit Plan updated. 211 Skiff- No Issues. 2430 Gulf to Bay- No Issues. 810 Missouri- No Issues. 107 McMullen- Conditions met and Permit Plan updated. 665 Bay Esplanade- No Issues. 1825 Sunset Pt- No Issues. 862 Bayway- No Issues. -----Original Message----- From: .Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, September O8, 2005 4:36 PM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals for the October 18, 2005 CDB DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 18, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-06053 1101 S Ft Harrison Avenue Cristino's Restaurant Planner Mike R. 2. FLD2005-06054 1770 Drew Street Chainwhee! Drive Planner: John S. 3. FLD2005-07067 1100 Cleveland Street Clearwater Center Planner: Robert T. 4. FLD2005-04036 211 Skiff Point Mirabel Pointe Planner: Robert T. 5. FLD2005-07075 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd DC Customs Planner: John S 6. F<_D2005-07076 810 Missouri Avenue Renaissance Square Condo's. Planner: Wayne W 7. FLD2005-07077 107 Mc Mullen Bth RD Dr Hickey Office Planner: Wayne W 8. FLD2005-07078 665 Bay Esplanade Nepenthe Planner: Robert T 9. FLD2005-07079 1825 Sunset Rt Road Bank & Office Planner Wayne W 10. FLD2005-07080 862 Bayway Blvd Regatta Bay Planner Wayne W I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, September 13, 2005. Have a Great Day! Thank you, 1 • • Flexible Development Application -Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2005-07076 Date Requested: September 23, 2005 Date Requested for (date): October 5, 2005 Maps Requested x^ Location Map x^ Aerial Map x^ Zoning Map x^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering x^ Legal Description ^ Survey x^ Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: Clearwater Retail, Group, Ltd. Case: FLD2005-07076 Property Site: 810 South Missouri Avenue size(Acres): 1.368 PIN: 15/29/ 15/ 16530/000/0100 Atlas Page: 296A - 2868 • 287A 2876 ~ m °° ~ "8~~ o ° m B° 19 0` 9 79 s k 2 S " ' `7 8 9 =~ ° t0 11 t3 _ ~ 6 I S0 w u''~t"y,11 CITY OF CLEARWATER ~~' A t0 0 20p~ re $ ° x - - - e 8 6 .7 ~ 5 q 3 $2 " Jo " R ~iC~W' /9~ AND VICINITY N^ - -- ~ ~- - ~~ ~-. -_ I , w~.- ,,. HB-#y ~ nw r + •, N - A ~tC~`t~! i PINEILA5 COUNTY. PLORIDA 1 eS a 0Y ! I $ g 8 >I - m ° 8 E9 ~ ^~ Q nB n.m q ' ~w.im ulmm $ S ~ COVRT ST Hs +~ RM ono-.eew - _w, em w+ r ~ PREPARED gv C~ a s ~ PUBLIC WORHS ADMINISTRAT]ON ^ CO ~, g S _ S ~ ° ` 31/08 ~ ~ L~ ~ ~ $ m ~ $ et ENGINEERING f /s 79 ~ rlle Ave fL 37756 ~ 100 S N Cleorwoter W 30 II 2 3 4 5 6 7 ~ 8 CONDO 92-62 4 5 6 7 8 ! 31/11 31/10 31 /09 31 O6 / ` v O ~ ~ .9 ~ a ppI N 5 d 3 4_ ij a 3 s ! ! a ) ., , . ~p t/q~ ~0' Pn.: (72])562-A]50. Fou (727)526-AT55 rro 3 4 g I 9 10 11 12 13 74 15 ~ ~ ~ 6 ~j 1= a t sar a o> /P auB a0.9 CRCENTUppD MBDI CAI so9 31/07 31/03 ly 1 ~ fv 6 I t !OA ar 3oB °s nllp://WWW,CIPOrW01el-11,COm/City_O¢pollmpnl@/publlp_W@II:9/engln@Pr/ l i ea t t e6 r AND REHABIWTAT[ON }7/Oa A ~ r soD n ^ 31631A" > & mer: D Btla B 7 6 X 16 15 14 1} 1Y Q 11 ~' P 9 < 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 Sp q soe ENTER e2-'~ ePr °'a 6 2U a7 , 6I . 31B., ~ ~ RCt;ERS ST PuDIIC In10fm0110n tlola 1Y NrnlSnptl Dy lnP C11y Or CIpOrWOler PUDIIC WOrI(@ AdminietrollOn /Englneering, and must De pcceDled and wed Dy the redolent with the underelonding tool the doto C 10 aoa 3 }1 13 PB / 11p received wOS collected IOr me purpose o/ developing 0 gropnic r - 7 2 3 a 5 6 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 ' 0 neorwoter PwA/E in+rostrwewre inventory. as sucn, me coy o I li g B E R % & ~ 8 z M RA A H ° 7 Y a U 45 16 StB 6JP to B +aB ed, concerning the mol:ps no warranties, eeprnsed or mp occurOCy. cOmpleleness, relloDlBly, °r gull Obllliy p/ 1nb dpip tar m 4 5 8 7 n ~ : 7 ony Omer p°rucumr use. wrlhermore, the city or cleorwoter TURNER _ Iso UB , a PWA/E a m na IlODn11y wnotspever pssodoled won Inc use r m:swesor such tlOto ~ soo ~ 3 a 5 ~ a: S 7 6 6 6 • eo/ 6 t 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 m eo4 06 6 75 to 13 t2 t1 10 610 9 so> 6BB "~ srl $ i~ $ ° - sos « ° m o °° :. ~ . R ~ „S„„„„ ~ ~ ~ $ g page is s eject tp pertoelc enonges. 6 e ^; n $ " so . , a ~ 6 a =„ `3 ~ ~ :: ' a i ,, . _ ~ ... ° ~ 6 , Tnro Aupa uNOTF. 1 2 ° 31/15 w r `mom ~F ~ ~ ~~ For Nrormp6on o6out lotesl reNSlons pleose Coll PWA/E or 606 } 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ~ ~ ~ ~ 31/19 lb 91 f ^° •[' S V Sao 9A > Nslt cur Wep sNe. ~ M 22 21 ,A~ 20 19 7~ 17 16 15 14 1~ 12 98 oq 't t ~ +° e N so e a 3 A s 6 1 7 8 9 10 17 12 1 2 3 4 5 7 ~rtl eJS 42/01 soa 30 29 28 g 1( 25 24 23 2 21 20 19 18 to aria 7 e 49 D D ~ 6 6 90 eu Q p' 27 26 cog d08 3 5 N IN^ ,$ ~ 'e,} eC, 616 42/02 °a 's ~ ~ yy f>BR- r err ~ ~ & Q err 4 R ~ sw 42/03 N PINE ST 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~ y 1 2 3 4 6 m~ 7 et ~ Isas I3 4 5 8 7 6 m I ~~ >nr g ~ a ~ m 1 roo WI 1 2 3 q 5 4 >at 6 81 3 >or >0 >os 6 15 14 13 12 11 t B m rro° 3g a 8 ID I On 0 100 200 400 600 $ ~ $ % 8 ~ E E t 12 11 10 9 8 7 Si 2p 7 t6 75 F: ti 13 11 >°° >oe « _ m o fi y tq SCALE: t" = 400' I ~ 4 5 6m 7 8 9 10 11 iT t' Ito 15 16 2 22 5 PINE 5 12 er 42/05 >OS 3 w. >-B n!s- tx3Bp7p_>JO rOB 32 }, 30 - ,;, zD 3p °' >rt <z/D6 LEGEND: _ 29 28 27 26 25 24 2} 22 21 20 I19 18 17 4 2t P 19 18 17 t6 1 2 } 4 5 6 7 8 9 a a~ nr 5 t0 I nB ~ ;' 6 7 8 9 10 it 12 74 1 20 19 16 17 16 5 14 1} 11>t4 I sp 42/07 O BLOCK NUMBER so $ ~ So 8 % ~ ~ 12 N ~ DUI „ 3P'°-„' l0 N ® 8 o e r 5p 8 a a° ~ m ~a ~_ ~ R AD ffi ' n Q7 1234 LOT ADDRESS ~~ • I eo c r - ;; ~'' I I ---~- CITY LIMITS LINE 1 3 4 5 t 2 3 4 5 t C ~ _____ i 1 @ eo I I ______ J I eat R t0 9 6 7 6 z er 16 ]a /03 ! ~ ~ F tD H0J 6 r-:^7 SHADED AREA -PROPERTY 6 7 6N a a s e ~ ° e I 1~ ;tl ~~ ~ W ~+ 7 L'"~"~ OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS m l er le ~ , I Ck ero a ° $ "g > ~ g vao I I HIpOE ~jOAKSI ~ a = i II ~ • AGREEMENT TO ANNEX '° JASMINE Ay ° 3 sot - i ___ ~ 1 I ~ I I F Boo & 8 & 8.. ~ % 8 ° ' ° __-~-_'- fN~-_~ ~ ~ S•,'' I\t ~ 9 ~ g ' CITY OWNED PROPERTY ~ I 6 - Rl 4~ ________ ____ •ae; ti a I 5 ~ „ O 6 Bor 3 4 ~a 8 ro `9 YORK ,5h1 - '~ !' 1 I MDR ZONING DESIGNATION °.,>, „ , Bo ---', Bos O II ;'' .~UP~%''' 3a ' ~ U g rterP g 9 7 6 e u to p aor 11 ';:• ,' ~ /01 i n 7 ZONE LINE + . ,> ,, ~ a eae i~_;--- APA'f~ME~TSi\~\ ~ ..• -----U-----~'; ere t gg ~ a .m ~ ; n e . , ` MACH IA S $ ~o ~ -- ~' ~b, ^` ti _ _____P.___1'I 7 Ste .',fi :' ~. '~, ,..... 630 PI B ' m ° I 1001 \ m ~. : r......., . .J ; I Illy I -__ Z__ I RC20N[ ORp mS\` 4 % ..~ "} ~ ~ "a ------ ``, f ,'~---~ ---'n-r -s p °>po a/al/ea 8 . ~~. 5 ~ d w e. >I rl „ n ~ g ° m ~ „ , I°° e. ° =- ;• IIOB': ;...._,~~ m 539° ,0/0>/B3 4 root U w^,•,> > roo4 ________- ' ,;,' ,•~ _ 6 ~ „ ~• ~s a ~ rR _ t I'': `:. ill Z J00r s> 59r> O1/}°/AA '~' l003 /DOB ` • `` , I ` .. ~ 7 Q 59eA 08/t5/9a a roo g Z I~~ ,(~ ~'~ ? ` : _+ rur `.,MAIN` STREET Af?T~~;'AT' m 8 7 6 3 °11 .: lope ,] C~ ~ ~] .' ' E' rte' aa9° px/y/Do • [ ~ rooe u II ~ -; :~ R N~AI$SAN;CE SOUF~~?E : n • ' R rota ~ Ib „ ~m ,• .I i i b. `~- ~_.:T-T, .. '~ I 8 >+ • . • '. ~ .a ror° w $ $ " $ • Taro .„ ' LOTUS ____________- II ~ ~' 'i'~:_Inl.l ~''f~ ~ i I PATH °m8 '~ I";~ S 6 «m Asa ______-_._ _ {J_~ ___`~___T i c",. •. ~ » - ~ ~g n g : no ° ~ $ $$ c m ° > rro a % I i ... .. `. -- .-.~._ ... ... `l.: "~':__~.7C-r' ,I y, ~ `___i ~'_____ m , ,. ll ~ ~ ~... } ,~', ~ , „ I a r rrOr 4 5 ° H ° • :, 'v .• m„ n . I10 IIB '• ~ ~•, . 1101 >f„m~• ~ ' i i Jtep Allnwml Air. S.~i i ______ _______ - O 1106 }1 +• i ... ... ... ..... ...._ _-. ... .__. _. ..... ... _...i .~___________ _________ AOL ~-" _~ -__-_ __ I 7 8 7 uaa 6 ~ ~ I I0 ~ mt > n s ~ „ ~,,, ~ ~.~ ; ~~ f1---? -~~-----=----.1 .. ^V-~ --~I a3 tt REVISED. Q 'IYa 3D ZI)OB ~ m °" m >e eo « ,. so >. °< a _.......... ~ (,.. H.. Ino 6/26/2002 y m ~ '~ w _ $~ a I ' RE ANS 70N CLUB AT 'f o .. JEFFOROS .. ... ........ - - m 9 - NC SOUA m E_,~ TREET i so>R-ss> R BB1. J9B n _. _ ]_ _ _.... _...... .. .. ... ~: IPPI~ i tt3 ~C2" N~JO D ~ m 9 6 m o ° o ao $$~% mw a « 60 ~ y .. `\11 ---'f---... __U~_ 1~A'u-E-~f'°~R (JYYB (- ~- ,~ t ., ~ I ~~ m m ° 8 0 ' ~---~~~--~- --- -- - ------ ~ ~ ZONING ATLAS } 2 1 6 5 4 q ~ I~. r3 ~ 22/D1 n.7_n° >' __"_ " __" " " rJie "'~ SW 1 /4 OF SECTION • 3056 • 306A ~ 3068 ~ ) 5 - 29 S - 15 E 2 9 6 A • `6\D SMISSauu. a~'a - 287A _ - • 287B nR , 4 p io 7n ~ as ~ , F ` „ems - - - ._ R R R R R COURT R - R - - - - - $TREFT k + ~i =, , , t '° ~ vluAda rnuRr w g v Iyw as ,»e-t.A AR, 63t 5 4 3 3 1 ~ v u ° w SopM O.e. t9a0.119 ]1 5173 t09 e76 13Y 6-I ~aA PROp®IDNAL ~ ;j;llyeq^2 ~]] ~ Q I ~ ]OA t ,^ yCI ~! CENIVi 1 bY- o° a + e a I r1 I ; a ~ ]~B a7 ]6 2$5 ]~ el ~ i~ t4 B T t7 ItB t91 ]D xt ]2 tJA 6ii GLEN OAKS 600 I .~ 6itl l a ewlp~ z •. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G~ o~~t 6;° caF couRSE STREET ~ ` `^^^^ „ 6 B 6YB 99P I 7 I ~M1 $ t1A I~i~ t t0 9 e ~J ~~`p!'~ Ti < 0~Q¢~`® O'{"8 Swat tee Is to n ~G0~4° 4a~, 4~C v SO Q3." ~$ ~ a~ g c N ~k a~$~R1~~ ~{~~$x~E= 1 ]6 93 `]i Y) ]] Y1 `t9 6Y j to a ,t tl a 't to '° ss1 a$ ;~ $~~~~a~G~,t'~~es - 41/01 O ~ / . 6 R 7URNFR 7 11 ° DB ¢ ' C:~N w 9 eoi a°oawa„ &•`~. 7^.£ ry>9 $ ~~ G wC,~ tJ~$eo ~ 1 2 3 . o wss 6 7 I t0 p 6 6 5 ] ] e01 >p 09 ° J 2` I 7 ~ ~ i0 it t] `BOI < 0 » T RNR 288A ~ ,3 „ , 1_~ca,""1 ;,' CITY OF CLEARWATER 8 ~ ;:: 0~ °j~/ AND VICINITY ~ ~ PINEILAS COUNTY. FLORIDA `R _ ~~1 y 4 PRCPARED B+ ~Q(A~ PUBWC WORKS AD)AINISTRATION 'R ~ V' ENGINEERING '1 \l 100 S. Nylle A.e., Cleowoler, FL 33756 . - 727.+ C~ Ph,: I727)y67-d75°. Fm: 1727)526-1753 ,0 9 8 nup://www.aeorwms-n.<om/CIryl9epaNmBnu/peppt works/engines/ OIpCI0lmer: 11 72 13 PuDlk InlOrmotlon Bolo U Wrnllh Bd Dy the Gly Of Cleorwoler PUDIIt Work9 A6mNIp1r0110n /EngNBerny Ontl mull DB oCCIpl10 and used Oy the r clDienl wllh the undNSlondM9 Ihol Ih< dol0 $ rleel,.ea woa pal«iea ror lnV pprooie O! dl.elopma o grppmc inlraalru<lure invmlor y. As a ch, Ih! Clly 01 Cleorwoler PWA/E mpk1E n0 w0lIOn11B1. IApr BppBd Or Implied. CO°Clmlp9 Ih1 is ~ ; dccurocy. cOmplel rn<ia, r<IlOblllty. Or null Willty Of thb dot0 Ipr -~ . -ny other porllcuior use. Furthermore, the City of Cleorwoler •10 9 B FWA/E ospumea no 4oeu9ly whplioever oiioclpted wNn lne use misuse of such doto. 11 12 13 ibis A91oe plye Ia wDlJ0ec1 to per'~odlc chpn9ef. g $ FOr MfOrmOliorc oD0u1 101!11 revlelpn• pleple toll PWA/E o vtait our wee see. 9 I IJ 42/01 ao ... .. .. • I A ddlr S t0 LII y 9 10 11 16 !0! ~ 7 : CO PO 0° OP 107]-tiSS vlC. el! 42/02 e~~• o ~ ° 6¢-e:9 .. ... ~ .....plo s xp I 42/03 6 as4 R ,.... ...... ~5 ; 4D ell ~9g 5 elo Bu 7 ° G " 12 °11 j~5j me 10 a >oo ~ Or / " 147'~Ja1i ~ ~ ~~ 4 BIB .rrltt 11 >00 6 702 w > 0 >00 ~ ~ ...: 12 I 706 .r ~ 13 i0I ,~13 9i dIp,1D 3 BPd y sop >~ a ~ ~ S ~ ao. 18 17 , 75 14 13 12 11 10 1 2 3 4 5 V 7 8 9 era s y LS R $ S C a!r III $ G 23 10 9 6 = p-9 1t t2 t3 0 100 200 400 60G I S Q .]+o- °i' 42/05 '°np9 R 42/12 ;'sit ezi "~ ~ PINE 97RE'(T I m SCALE: 1" = 400' eu lt. w by >lo >os ~ ~~ 4D 2 eii «~ W A ~ w 704 9 nr 42/06 ~J 3 Z ~rD ~ ~ .. 12. ~$ ~ 6 ~ ~ . re iii~~` _; ..... _ ~ '! S `le n ^I 15 l4 13 12 n to ~ LEGEND: t0 I 71B iro dj/1 d' .83 10 8 ao o li ~ !a ~ ...... ~ 1700 N O ,1 ff1 I 62/07 N, N N r 1> tel: ~ ~427i 3; ;,~ ~ 42/15 ~ ~ ~ N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 , ° d ° $ ° ° ~ ~ ° ~: ~ •~ •~~~ ! $ a~01 Q' rnl so' 12 t3 BLOCK NUMBER $ oRUw ROAD Jo+:.m `" ~ttF S a 9 I ea I eoJ 6` 5~ 4 3 2` 1 7 eoo 0 9 ~ 10 12 13 poo ~ $ a ~ $ ~ ~ Ii ~ a~ ~ 9 1 GG w ^ ^ tla $~„ ` epl 8 7 6 5 4 } 2 1 eao en U 10 1 DI y q 13 A 1g4 15 3. G 16 ~ 1g7 R Ifi e!4 eo 107 $. ~ 1 • and 50 60l I C ~ s° eas 51-tup 1 D1 28 19 eoa eos eps 00 17 ea! eot 2 2 eo4 29 W e 99 is ede Bog 3 S me 30 `,kn, ~! ~ep 9 $ JASMINE WAY 3 98 15e14 el6 4 d eu < I R eta ~ B!a 31 6 BIE I 3 DIB 7 ptP BtB 890 801 ~ .. & ~ _ 1j . , 7 6 5 3 2 1 VE CH °" "g 8YI ~'~ 9 it 12 ~ $ 113@ N^U tb t4 5 CY w! ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~a~$~$k~$ en 97 son ~! ~ Sale ut 32 7 ~ 6 5 ~ 13 soY 6 kCJ Dot 9 8 41 3 2 1 96 C7 6 yyyj~~~ 30 83 aoo Do! 12 po4 Boa Bw 33 ? 911 814 95 7 ~ 7 10 it V 13 14 15 16 17 /B BOJ plo DII z B06 Dpa 3a a 11 8 '~' 8 _~ $ ~ C~G $ ~RE A~~ ede 94 ~ C 1D pea pop 35 __~ I $ MAGNOLIA 93 D!t 9 OZ 9 = 9!J 36 T •. OR wa loor ... r3 ~ ~ ~ w ~ a, loon ~` !!!yyy loo! rood k y S 8 'C ~ a ~_~ a $ loo 92 55 s 56 64 !oa ~ 37 I 7 6 5 4~ } 2 1 7 6 54 roo4 57 '5 `i N 1 T D ~ 9 8 37 b3 5` a 3 2^ t loose ~ roo° 63roo4 W roo 38 ron mro ~ s3 rooe IoaD6 loos ~ loop " ' I g M VE C UB 2 D DD 48 b8 `~{ 90 !o!r Iola s2 39 IOD~ 7 i 9 10 11 12 13 14 10 191 12 t3 14 15 16 17 16 1009 ~, 5 5 8 pa~ $ ~ ~ $aw ~F ~ $ ~ CAE ~$~ ~A~ q~ ~ rolaB9 52 5~~ 5, ~ Iola 40 ___LS LOTUS PATH $ 51 ,off _ ~ lolr pO -_ -- I IY10 tl5 H O C 3~ ' N ~ ~ $ 6 1 2 HE 4 s 6 7 8 9 V la. E 10 11 12 15 t6 82 8 roo a3 tt Ty'~ ,B t7 16 15 14 13 t2 t 7 8 5 ,4 ~ 21 1o rroe I n aon•ss+ x ~ A - U R R 3 a ~ $w E ~ ~ & ~ $ uoe lol>-- ,d° LOTUS PATH R 41 110187 5D 3 ~ ~ II01 ~ ~ 4 V~ pJ 49 48 ' 47 ~~ 42 N 1ro686 ~ ~ 1100 46 d5 44 4} BS 8 4 83 82 et 80 79 78 77 7b 75 74 73 as ~ a ~ : $ ~ ~ ~ „ a ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ,~ FF _ _ _ _ SIRE - - _ n ., IYIO ' •.. _ Itpl 1Q 1~> 146 246 SS Iib1 '~ Y+ ;, ~ ;, w _ w 21/012 .i'tia .. ., :..... ~..._.., 30 29 28 27 26 ~ to 24 345 1 '2 _3 4 ~5 "6 '7 ~ I °T-2 ~3 `4 ~ 306A • 306B __ ~ J 1234 LOT ADDRESS D 1 BD ~ ~ a^a ~ s ^ e _ ____ CITY LIMITS LINE 4d/Ot ~^ a n --~ SHADED AREA - PROPERTv ~ 2 m ~ '=-~ OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS eo1 ad/02 n 3 eae ~ 8^P m Ip • AGREEMENT TO ANNEX 4 °11 u9 ~ r4ae 9 ' CITY OWNED PROPERTY 5 eoo ad/o3 "' r ! a1 MDR zoNlNC DESIGNATION 680 Bor ,~ s 1190 ~ l4~ ZONE LINE 7 utB CT. aos 1 plP I B B!I pp ' C7 ] 6 llrP = aro ;9 m 2V 3~ 4a 5 ' s eb .tD°! em = a tae E. MAGrIOLI 86r. 1l rooo ~ 1 ` 6 ` C 2 $ 12°0' 2 I S d ! 13 C 14 $ 13 ~12w 11 t O ~ ~ 8 ~ t - rol P g E. LOTUS PA~I 15 no o R 9 S$ ^ C 3 t! I S 11 I ~ 9 7~ e aor rA REVISED; -691 silt-161 e»o-193 RI ~ 4 ~/rL6/L0~2 e y $ ae 3 ZONING ATLAS ~~ ~ E yJ a, SE t /4 OF SECTION (~ C 307A ~ 15 - 29 S- t 5 E ~ 7 V • • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:36 PM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Irwin, Rod; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals for the October 18, 2005 CDB DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October 18, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-06053 1101 S Ft Harrison Avenue Cristino's Restaurant Planner Mike R. 2. FLD2005-Ofi054 1770 Drew Street Chainwheel Drive Planner: John S. 3. FLD2005-07067 1100 Cleveland Street Clearwater Center Planner: Robert T. 4. FLD2005-04036 211 Skiff Point Mirabel Pointe Planner: Robert T. 5. FLD2005-07075 2430 Gulf To Bay Blvd DC Customs Planner: John S 6. FLD2005-07076 810 Missouri Avenue Renaissance Square Condo's Planner: Wayne W 7. FLD2005-07077 107 Mc Mullen Bth RD Dr Hickey Office Planner: Wayne W 8. FLD2005-07078 665 Bay Esplanade Nepenthe Planner: Robert T 9. FLD2005-07079 1825 Sunset Pt Road Bank & Office Planner Wayne W 10. FLD2005-07080 862 Bayway Blvd Regatta Bay Planner Wayne W I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, September 13, 2005. Have a Great Day! Thank you, Sherry Watkins Planning Department 1 1 ' - -- OURI AVE • ~~ ~~ 5 ~ Case Number: FLD2005 07076 810 S MISS 2.3 p Owner(s): Clearwater Retail Group Ltd ~ 6000 Lake Forrest Dr Ste 560 ~ ~ • Atlanta, Ga 30328 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire ~~ Po Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-441-8617, E-MAIL: ed@jpfirm.com Location: 1.368 acres located at the southwest corner of South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road. Atlas Page: 296A Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings as part of a mixed use with a reduction to the front (east along South Missouri Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 52.25 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional xx feet for a clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Road from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the foundation landscaping from five feet to three feet (to pool deck), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner Ill Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickart Applicant/Rep: Jayne Sears, O.C. Cabrera, Brian Goe, Bob Hatfield, Harlan Newton The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located no further than 40-feet from Fire Hydrant. 2. 10-foot sanitary sewer easements shown on plan ah•eady exist. 3. Remove Sheets #6 and #7; retain and resubmit with building permit application. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Provide a recorded copy of across-access agreement with the owner of adjoining property to south such agreement to be binding upon successors in title to property. 2. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Prior to CO: 1. Condo plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda -Thursday; September 1, 2005 -Page 46 1 . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE A>~ORITY HAVING NRISDICTION SHALL NOT RECEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. 2 . An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. I OOpsi at roof is required. Fire Pump. PRIOR TO CDB. 3 , An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. Emergency lighting should also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB 4 . Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a Fire Protection Engineer to assure adequate water supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Calculations due PRIOR TO PERMIT. 5 . Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. (, Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 7 , Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. g . Fire Alarm System in accordance with NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 shall be installed, acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 9 . Show 30' turn radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress. PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: I . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 , No Issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 47 1 . Sheet L-1 - A livk tree is proposed in the terminal island on theth side of the western driveway to the service road. This island is impacted by the existing sanitary sewer line that runs directly below the tree location and the proposed drainage pipe. Change the proposed live oak for this island, and the "island" on the north side of this driveway, to two crape myrtle or ligustrum trees per island. 2 . Sheet L-1 -Canopy-type shade trees, such as slash pines or live oaks, should not be planted within 20 feet of overhead power lines, such as along Missouri Avenue and Druid Road, to avoid necessary future hatracking or severe pruning to avoid the overhead lines. Change out to accent trees or palms. 3 , Sheet L-1 -Per Section 3-1202.B.1, accent trees are to be no more than 25% of the required trees (unless overhead lines are unavoidable) and two accent trees equal one shade tree. Palm trees are to be no more than 25% of the required trees and three palms (clustered) equal one shade tree. Based on the plan submitted,accent trees (26 crape myrtle and ligustrum trees) represent 58% of the required trees, which exceeds the maximum 25%. Revise. 4 . Sheet L-1 -Section 3-1202.E.2 requires a foundation landscape area five feet in width, comprising of trees, shrubs and ground cover (see this Section for specific requirements). The area along Missouri Avenue does not meet these requirements for width or plant materials. Revise. Suggestion: remove the sidewalk that runs in front of the pool and deadends into the Wendy's parcel. 5 . Sheet L-1 -Code requires shade trees to be a minimum of 10 feet high and accent trees to be a minimum of eight feet high. Winged elm and ligustrum trees do not meet these requirements. Revise. 6 . Sheet L-1 -Revise plan to ensure it meets the following requirements of Section 3-1202.B.1 for shrubs (revise plant material list to include spacing): A.) 18--24" in height when used in a perimeter buffer -planted every 36", (measured from the center of the shrub) providing a 100% continuous hedge which will be 36", high and 80% opaque 12 months from the time a certificate of occupancy is received (excluding drives and visibility triangles where applicable); B.) 14--24" in height when used for interior -planted every 30"--36", respectively (measured from the center of the shrub) with a 3 gallon minimum. 7 . Sheet L-1 -Show the visibility triangles on this plan and ensure Code requirements are met for landscape materials within the triangles. g , Describe HOW (in detail) the landscaping proposed has been designed as part of the architectural theme of the building. Otherwise, describe HOW the design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program are demonstrably more amactive than landscaping otherwise permitted under the minimum landscape standards. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Recreation Land and Recreation Facility Impact Fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs frst. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 , 1) No Issues. Solid Waste: 1 . Where will recycling carts be stored? Ideal next to enclosure. Show double dumpster enclosure to city specs on detail sheet. Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Recess columns from the end of parking stalls to improve maneuverability. 3. Vertical height clearance for parking garage must comply with current Florida Building Code. Section 406.2.2. 4. H/C parking space near Missouri Avenue driveway on architectural site plan does not comply to the City's dimension standards. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 48 1 . 9/1/05 - WW • • Revised at DRC meeting -Required buffer along the south and west property lines is 10 feet, not five feet. 8/7/05 - W W Delineate and dimension all required perimeter landscape buffers (15 feet required along South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road; five feet required along south and west property lines). 2 . Driveway to the service road on the west side at 40 feet in width is excessive. Reduce to no more than 30 feet in width. 3 . The proposal indicates a setback of 4.5 feet in the southwest and southeast corners of the site, which is a setback reduction from five feet and also represents a reduction to the required landscape buffer of 10 feet. Increase to a minimum of five feet by reducing the width of the terminal island adjacent to the driveway to the service road to the west and to the driveway on S. Missouri Avenue and shifting the parking northward. 4 . Sheet 3/7 -How does one access the pump room on the southeast corner of the building, since there is no sidewalk shown? 5 . What type of fence is proposed around the pool (solid, open wrought iron style...)? 6 . Architectural site plan and garage level plan indicates the location of ground-level a/c units. Four of these a/c units are proposed within the pool area. Correct? If not, relocate. 7 . Code requires all outside mechanical equipment (a/c units) to be completely screened on four sides by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation from view from public streets and abutting properties. If such screening is provided by means of a fence, gate, or wall, materials which are consistent with those used in the construction of and the architectural style of the principal building shall be utilized. Also, screening of the mechanical equipment is to be accomplished in a manner that does not interfere with the proper operation and/or maintenance of such equipment. Based on the location of the a/c units shown on the architectural site plan and the garage level plan, as well as the Landscape Plan Sheet L-1, it is unclear how this requirement is being met. Revise plans to show compliance. 8 . Provide the height of the clock tower from midpoint of the pitched roof (building height) to the top of the clock tower. Revise all appropriate elevations. 9 . Revise Exhibit A, Variance/Flexibility Request Checklist, for height to conform to the proposed height. Additionally, revise the justification for height, as there are NO mechanical equipment contained within the roof structure (if there is any, please inform as to what equipment and where located, and why the roof needs to be this high for such mechanical equipment). 10 . Revise Exhibit A, Variance/Flexibility Request Checklist, for "setbacks" justification -the fact there is five feet of sod within the right-of--way back of the sidewalk is no justification for the proposed reduction of the required perimeter buffer on the subject property, as that area within the right-of--way could change tomorrow based on a public improvement to Druid Road. 11 . General Applicability criteria #6 response -Provide information as to how the existing Wendy's restaurant, which stays open late, with there commercial traffic, odors and noise associated to customers and deliveries, will have a minimal impact/effect on the proposed residential units on this property. 12 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response -Provide written justification as to HOW this proposal "is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards." The important words are "otherwise impractical," as to why you cannot prepare a development proposal that meets the Code requirements. 13 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 response -Provide specific written justification as to HOW this proposed residential project is "compatible with adjacent land uses" that include commercial uses (such as the adjacent Wendy's restaurant). Include in the response how the introduction of residential use at this location, which was planned for commercial use, will fit into the fabric of uses created with the overall "master plan" with commercial uses existing to the south of this parcel. 14 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response -Provide specific written justification as to HOW this proposed residential project "creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." This parcel was originally slated for commercial use. Address how this residential project fits in with the established commercial uses to the south, which will now be between residential projects, which was not the original vision. Remove discussion of increased value and taxes from this area (more appropriate in #2). (Note: any development on this parcel will increase the ad valorem tax roll.) Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 49 r IS . Comprehensive IntiTf Redevelopment Project criteria #7 response - • ' Height Request -Revise the justification for height, as there are NO mechanical equipment contained within the roof structure (if there is any, please inform as to what equipment and where located, and why the roof needs to be this high for such mechanical equipment). Landscape Buffer Request -Address the reductions to the required buffer along Druid Road and along the south property line. 16 . Sheet 3/7 -Remove Note on right side of sheet regarding prior approved buffer, as this was never built. This information may be appropriate in the written material. 17 . All utilities on-site must be underground, including power acid communication lines. 18 . Future sign at the intersection will need to be a monument-type sign a maximum of four feet in height and a sign area meeting Code requirements, designed with materials and colors consistent with that of the building. 19 . If these residential units are to be sold as condominiums, a condo plat must be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 10/18/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 9/8/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. 2:35 pm - -- 810 S MISSOURI AVE • f Case Number: FLD2005 07076 Owner(s): Clearwater Retail Group Ltd Q, ~ . 6000 Lake Forrest Dr Ste 560 ``'~~ Atlanta, Ga 30328 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-441-8617, E-MAIL: ed@jpfirm.com Location: 1.368 acres located at the southwest corner of South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road. Atlas Page: 296A Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings as part of a mixed use with a reduction to the front (east along South Missouri Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to 52.25 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional xx feet for a clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Road from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the foundation landscaping from five feet to three feet (to pool deck), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner 111 Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickart Applicant/Rep: Ed Armstrong, Jayne Sears, Ed Mazur, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , 1. Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located no further than 40-feet from Fire Hydrant. 2. 10-foot sanitary sewer easements shown on plan already exist. 3. Remove Sheets #6 and #7; retain and resubnut with building permit application. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Provide a recorded copy of across-access agreement with the owner of adjoining property to south such agreement to be binding upon successors in title to property. 2. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index # 109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Prior to CO: 1. Condo plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 46 1 , ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RECEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE-2004 EDITION IN YOUR SUMMARY OF CODES. 2 , An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump. PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. Emergency lighting should also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB 4 . Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a Fire Protection Engineer to assure adequate water supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Calculations due PRIOR TO PERMIT. 5 . Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. (. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 7 , Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. g , Fire Alarm System in accordance with NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 shall be installed, acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1.. No issues. Land Resources: 1 , No Issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 47 1 . Sheet L-1 -Alive oak tree is proposed in the terminal island on th• th side of the western driveway to the service road. This island is impacted by the existing sanitary sewer line that runs directly below the tree location and the proposed drainage pipe. Change the proposed live oak for this island, and the "island" on the north side of this driveway, to two crape myrtle or ligustrum trees per island. 2 . .Sheet L-1 -Canopy-type shade trees, such as slash pines or live oaks, should not be planted within 20 feet of overhead power lines, such as along Missouri Avenue and Druid Road, to avoid necessary future hatracking or severe pruning to avoid the overhead lines. Change out to accent trees or palms. 3 . Sheet L-1 -Per Section 3-1202.B.1, accent trees are to be no more than 25% of the required trees (unless overhead lines are unavoidable) and two accent trees equal one shade tree. Palm trees are to be no more than 25% of the required trees and three palms (clustered) equal one shade tree. Based on the plan submitted,accent trees (26 crape myrtle and ligustrum trees) represent 58% of the required trees, which exceeds the maximum 25%. Revise. 4 . Sheet L-1 -Section 3-1202.E.2 requires a foundation landscape area five feet in width, comprising of trees, shrubs and ground cover (see this Section for specific requirements). The area along Missouri Avenue does not meet these requirements for width or plant materials. Revise. Suggestion: remove the sidewalk that runs in front of the pool and deadends into the Wendy's parcel. 5 . Sheet L-1 -Code requires shade trees to be a minimum of 10 feet high and accent trees to be a minimum of eight feet high. Winged elm and ligustrum trees do not meet these requirements. Revise. 6 . Sheet L-1 -Revise plan to ensure it meets the following requirements of Section 3-1202.B.1 for shrubs (revise plant material list to include spacing): A.) 18--24" in height when used in a perimeter buffer -planted every 36", (measured from the center of the shrub) providing a 100% continuous hedge which will be 36", high and 80% opaque 12 months from the time a certificate of occupancy is received (excluding drives and visibility triangles where applicable); B.) 14--24" in height when used for interior -planted every 30"--36", respectively (measured from the center of the shrub) with a 3 gallon minimum. 7 , Sheet L-1 -Show the visibility triangles on this plan and ensure Code requirements are met for landscape materials within the triangles. g . Describe HOW (in detail) the landscaping proposed has been designed as part of the architectural theme of the building. Otherwise, describe HOW the design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program are demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted under the minimum landscape standards. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Recreation Land and Recreation Facility Impact Fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs fist. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 , 1) No Issues. Solid Waste: 1 . Where will recycling carts be stored? Ideal next to enclosure. Show double dumpster enclosure to city specs on detail sheet. Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Recess columns from the end of parking stalls to improve maneuverability. 3. Vertical height clearance for parking garage must comply with current Florida Building Code. Section 406.2.2. 4. H/C parking space near Missouri Avenue driveway on architectural site plan does not comply to the City's dimension standards. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 48 1 . Delineate and dimon all required perimeter landscape buffers (let required along South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road; five feet required along south and west property lines). 2 . Driveway to the service road on the west side at 40 feet in width is excessive. Reduce to no more than 30 feet in width. 3 . The proposal indicates a setback of 4.5 feet in the southwest and southeast corners of the site, which is a setback reduction from five feet and also represents a reduction to the required landscape buffer of 10 feet. Increase to a minimum of five feet by reducing the width of the terminal island adjacent to the driveway to the service road to the west and to the driveway on S. Missouri Avenue and shifting the parking northward. 4 . Sheet 3/7 -How does one access the pump room on the southeast corner of the building, since there is no sidewalk shown? 5 . What type of fence is proposed around the pool (solid, open wrought iron style...)? 6 . Architectural site plan and garage level plan indicates the location of ground-level a/c units. Four of these a/c units are proposed within the pool area. Correct? If not, relocate. 7 . Code requires all outside mechanical equipment (a/c units) to be completely screened on four sides by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation from view from public streets and abutting properties. If such screening is provided by means of a fence, gate, or wall, materials which are consistent with those used in the construction of and the architectural style of the principal building shall be utilized. Also, screening of the mechanical equipment is to be accomplished in a manner that does not interfere with the proper operation and/or maintenance of such equipment. Based on the location of the a/c units shown on the architectural site plan and the garage level plan, as well as the Landscape Plan Sheet L-1, it is unclear how this requirement is being met. Revise plans to show compliance. 8 . Provide the height of the clock tower from midpoint of the pitched roof (building height) to the top of the clock tower. Revise all appropriate elevations. 9 . Revise Exhibit A, Variance/Flexibility Request Checklist, for height to conform to the proposed height. Additionally, revise the justification for height, as there are NO mechanical equipment contained within the roof structure (if there is any, please inform as to what equipment and where located, and why the roof needs to be this high for such mechanical equipment). 10 . Revise Exhibit A, Variance/Flexibility Request Checklist, for "setbacks" justification -the fact there is five feet of sod within the right-of--way back of the sidewalk is no justification for the proposed reduction of the required perimeter buffer on the subject property, as that area within the right-of--way could change tomorrow based on a public improvement to Druid Road. 11 . General Applicability criteria #6 response -Provide information as to how the existing Wendy's restaurant, which stays open late, with there commercial traffic, odors and noise associated to customers and deliveries, will have a minimal impact/effect on the proposed residential units on this property. 12 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response -Provide written justification as to HOW this proposal "is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards." The important words are "otherwise impractical," as to why you cannot prepare a development proposal that meets the Code requirements. 13 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 response -Provide specific written justification as to HOW this proposed residential project is "compatible with adjacent land uses" that include commercial uses (such as the adjacent Wendy's restaurant): Include in the response how the introduction of residential use at this location, which was planned for commercial use, will fit into the fabric of uses created with the overall "master plan" with commercial uses existing to the south of this parcel. 14 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response -Provide specific written justification as to HOW this proposed residential project "creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole." This parcel was originally slated for commercial use. Address how this residential project fits in with the established commercial uses to the south, which will now be between residential projects, which was not the original vision. Remove discussion of increased value and taxes from this area (more appropriate in #2). (Note: any development on this parcel will increase the ad valorem tax roll.) Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 49 . 15 . Comprehensive InfiIl Redevelopment Project criteria #7 response -~ Height Request -Revise the justification for height, as there are NO mechanical equipment contained within the roof structure (if there is any, please inform as to what equipment and where located, and why the roof needs to be this high for such mechanical equipment). Landscape Buffer Request -Address the reductions to the required buffer along Druid Road and along the south property line. 16 . Sheet 3/7 -Remove Note on right side of sheet regarding prior approved buffer, as this was never built. This information may be appropriate in the written material. 17 . All utilities on-site must be underground, including power and communication lines. 18 . Future sign at the intersection will need to be a monument-type sign a maximum of four feet in height and a sign area meeting Code requirements, designed with materials and colors consistent with that of the building. 19 . If these residential units are to be sold as condominiums, a condo plat must be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 10/18/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 9/8/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 50 • • Wells, Wayne From: Cyndi Tarapani [ctarapani@fldesign.com] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 11:09 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ed Mazur; Jaynes@jpfirm.com Subject: Renaissance Square-Case FLD 2005-07076 Wayne-I am writing regarding your letter of incompleteness and specifically issue #10. I believe that this issue was already provided in the original submittal-the materials are shown on all of the full size b/w elevations prepared by the architect. In the original submittal, I did provide two copies of full size opies) color elevations and 15 copies of a reduced size color elevation for the Missouri facade. Unless the CDB has revised their policy, I thought that the Board limited the color elevations required to the primary facade only and we have provided that. I would appreciate your immediate attention to this so that we can resubmit by tomorrow. Please call me at 234-7867. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Florida Design Consultants 727-849-7588 ctarapani@fldesign.com 1 • • Wells, Wayne From: Cyndi Tarapani [ctarapani@fldesign.com] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 12:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ed Mazur; Jaynes@jpfirm.com Subject: Renaissance Square Condos, FLD 2005-07076 Wayne-the principal architect on this project is out of the office all week. I have left a message for his partner for tomorrow but I don't know if he will revise another's plans. I would appreciate your understanding of this matter-if you agree, I will let you know tomorrow whether or not the plans will be available this week. We definitely will NOT be able to submit Item 10 by tomorrow's deadline and I hope you will not hold this project up for that one minor issue. As we discussed this morning, the black and white elevations that you currently have in the file do identify the materials and the color elevation shows the color for each material selected. We will certainly be able to have the black and white reduced elevations well before the public hearing which is the purpose that you have identified for these plans. With regard to the other issues, we will be responding to them along with Jayne Sears of Ed Armstrong's office. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Florida Design Consultants 727-849-7588 ctarapani@fldesign.com %`~ • ~ •• , . -- ~ .~_--y __x ~~ Community Response Team ~%v - - luJ.~:~= Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. `f'~~ p ~S - ~ 70 cello Meeting Date: `. Location: ~~ ~ S ~ ~ ~S ©v~ ^ Current Use: ^ Active Code Enforcement Case (no) yes: ~~~ ~~ ^ Address number (yes) (no) ( scant land ^ .Landscaping (yes) o) ^ Overgrown (yes) `o) ^ Debris (yes) no) ^ Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) no) ^ Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor) (vacant Ian ^ Fencing non good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ^ Paint (good) (fair) (poor) (garish) ^ Grass Parking (yes) no ^ Residential Parking Violations (yes) no ^ Signage ( one (ok) (not ok) (billboard) ^ Parking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) ( eeds repaving ^ Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) ^ Outdoor storage (yes (no Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date: ~-/~~"SReviewed by: ~~vu~ Telephone: ~~- ~~7// Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 ,r ff, ~~ Case Number: FLD2005-07076 -- 810 S MISSOURI AVE Owner(s) Clearwater Retail Group Ltd 6000 Lake Foaest Dr Ste 560 Atlanta, Ga 30328 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727441-8617, E-MAIL: ed@jpfirm.com Location: 1.368 acres located at the southwest comer of South Missouri Avenue and Druid Road. Atlas Page: 296A Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval to pernut attached dwellings as part of a mixed use with a reduction to the front (east along South Missouri Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Road) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and an increase to building height from 25 feet to xx feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional xx feet for a clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Road from 15 feet to 10 feet (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the foundation landscaping from five feet to three feet (to pool deck), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, F133761 TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 1, 2005 -Page 8 X f, ' -division of Corporations U • I~Yit~c~~~-?c;~,au?t~r~f;r;t;r~j~St~~~~r I~~~~i,~~~~r~l.c7~~c~~'~C}~r,ctti{7ri;~, `.afar ,~,, ~ ~ « ~~; ~ r .. ,,. ~... ~ ~I~t:~~~1.~1r~rl~r~_.nr ~ _~~11:].C I'LIC~;U.I~~'~ Florida Limited Partnership CLEARWATER RETAIL GROUP, LTD. PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 6000 LAKE FORREST DRIVE, SUITE 560 ATLANTA GA 30328 Changed 05/31/2005 MAILING ADDRESS 6000 LAKE FORREST DRIVE, SUITE 560 ATLANTA GA 30328 Changed 05/31/2005 Document Number A99000000697 State FL Last Event CANCEL ADM DISS/REV Actual Contribution 100.00 FEI Number 582465165 Status ACTIVE Event Date Filed 05/31/2005 Registered Agent Date Filed 04/28/1999 Effective Date NONE Event Effective Date NONE Page 1 of 2 ~ Name & Address ~ WARD, R. CARLTON ESQ. 1253 PARK STREET CLEARWATER FL 33756 General Partner Detail Name & Address Document Number CLEARWATER-PINEVIEW ASSOCIATES, INC. 6000 LAKE FORREST DR] VE, SUITE 560 P97000101839 ATLANTA GA 30328 http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n 1=A99000000697&n2=NAMFW... 8/7/2005 ...Division of Corporations • Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2003 12/31 /2003 2004 05/31 /2005 2005 05/31 /2005 Previous Filing ~ Return to List I Next Filing View Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. Page 2 of 2 05/31/2005 -- REINSTATEMENT 12/31/2003 -- REINSTATEMENT 09/09/2002 -- COR -ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 12/20/2001 -- REINSTATEMENT 12/20/2001 -- Amendment 12/26/2000 -- ANN REP/iJNIFORM BUS REP 04/28/1999 --Domestic LP THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT ~rx~~ar~~~a~s r~q~.i~~' ~r~xpca~~hans H~1~- ~. http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n1=A99000000697&n2=NAMFW... 8/7/2005 Pinsalas County Property App~r Information: 15 29 15 54000 002 0~ Page 2 of 5 15 / 29 ~ 15 / 10530 1 000 I 0100 07-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:54:31 Ownership Information Vacant Property Use and Sales CLEARWATER RETAIL GROUP LTD OBK; 10524 OPG; 1559 6000 LAKE FORREST DR STE 560 ATLANTA GA 30328-3878 EVAC; Non-EVAC Cor~~parablc sales Value as Prop Addr; 0 of Jars 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: .00 sales from 2002 - 200~i: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price {Qual/UnQ} Vac/Imp Plat Information 0 10 0/ 0 0 ( } 2002: Book 124 Pgs 092-093 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 IO 0} 0 0 { } 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market; 600,600 Homestead: NO Ownership ~ .000 Govt. Exem: HO Use ~: . 000 AssessedlCap; 600,600 Institutional Exem; NO Tax Exempt ~; .000 Historic Exem; 0 Taxable; 600,600 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall; Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage; 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Ta.xe:1; 13, 795.42 S} 0 x 0 13. 00 58, 877. 55 S Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be ; 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 13, 795.42 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 13, 795.42 Short Legal CLEARWATER RETAIL LOT 10 Description L Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005 Pinellas County Property App~er Information: 15 29 15 54000 002 0~ 1~ ~ 2~ ~ ~~ f ~s~~o r o00 ~ o~oo 07-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:54:31 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 Page 3 of 5 Vacant Ex-tr2t F~atur~s Description Dirnensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 ~} . 00 0 0 0 0 3} . 00 0 0 0 0 4} 00 0 0 0 0 5} .00 0 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ®~ http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005 • Pir~.~llas County Property App~r Information: 15 29 15 54000 002 0~ 71~ b11 , ~CJlJF21 ' k'tr E E ~~, -~~~ Iic"` II~ti G~ SIG C7F2lJICi MISStjUF'I RCi ~`dE Page 4 of 5 1 ? :.~ u~ rn ?I~ I. h,~ ~S~~RI DI M1 ~tj [.li ~~ B~3 t,~ISS~IJPI ?~ '',~ E 1211 C~F'i_iIQ Rd ~~ISS~URI' ~~I20 r~.,~f~ I lE A v' E 1tJ?~.'Y t ~ ry L /-~ p 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005 Pinellas County Property App~er Information: 15 29 15 54000 002 0~ Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005 ~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 18, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (cont'd from 09-20-OS) KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle salesldisplay contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C; and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 & 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7- 10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 2. Alan Rophie, Ralph Rophie, Cecila Betech, & Cheryl Cohen (Rophie Family Partnership) are requesting Flexible Development approval to allow Vehicle Service Major in an existing 9,000 sq ft building located in the Commercial zoning district with a reduction to front (north along Shelly St) setback to pavement from 25 ft to 11.39 ft, reduction to front (east along Kilmer Ave) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Blvd) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reduction to the minimum number of required parking spaces from 14 spaces (1.5 spaces per 1000 sq ft of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (1.44 spaces per 1000 sq ft of gross floor area) and to permit a 6-ft high non-opaque fence within the required front setbacks (north along Shelly St and east along Kilmer Ave), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; with a reduction to front (east along Kilmer Ave) landscape buffer from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and reduction to front (south along Gulf to Bay Blvd) landscape buffer from 15 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), • as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Vehicle Service Major) at 2430 Gulf to Bav Blvd, Sec 18-29-16, M&B 13.04. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-07075 3. Liberty Mirabel LLC (Raxit & Punit Shah, and Battle Creek Hospitality Inc) are requesting Flexible Development request to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 47 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 13 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 4.75 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and 10 ft (to pool), and a reduction in the lot width from 150 ft to 142 ft as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Secs 2-404.F and 2-1602.C and H. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 211 & 221 Skiff Pt, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5-A Lots 33 & 34. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-04036 4. Clearwater Centre LLC (Guy & Susan Bonneville, Sebastian & Elizabeth Dorner, & Anthony Dorner) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for ht (148 ft to roof deck where a maximum of 75 ft would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit amixed-use (71 attached dwellings and 44,300 sq ft of non-residential floor area), and to increase the building- ht an additional 27 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (71 attached dwellings and 44,300 sq ft of non-residential floor area)] at 1100 Cleveland St, Bassadena Blk A, Lots 1-14 incl part of Lot 15, and Bassadena Blk B Lots 9-11, and 14-25. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07067 5. Melodie A Ferguson, Melodie A FerEUSOn Tre Rem, Robert M Pennock, Robert M Pennock II Tre Rem, and Paul & Tracey Kelley are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 65 ft (to roof deck), with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the north (side) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the south (rear) and east (rear) setbacks from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07025) of 2 dwelling units from 120 Brightwater Dr under the provisions of Secs 4-1402 and 4-1403. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 665 & 667 Bav Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 6 & 7. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07078 6. Lenny Cristino is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of a restaurant with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 96 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing outdoor seating deck), from 25 ft to 22 ft (to canopy), and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 14.3 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure) and a reduction of parking spaces from 43 spaces to 9 spaces, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.M, and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 9 ft (along S Fort Harrison Ave), and a reduction to the rear (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Restaurant) at 1101 S Fort Harrison Ave, Magnolia Park Blk 39, Lot 1, parts of Lot 2 & Vac Lotus Path Adj on N. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 06053 • 7. Thomas C & Dorothy J Jessup are requesting a Flexible Development approval (1) to permit the expansion of retail sales in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Ave) setback from 25 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 15.5 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (south along Drew St) setback from 25 ft to 4.2 ft (to pavement) and reductions to the front (east along North Keene Rd) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to existing building) and a reduction from 38 parking spaces to 28 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; (2) to permit non-residential parking in the Medium Density Residential District with reductions to the front (west along Mars Ave) from 25 ft to 8.5 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 11 ft (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (east along N Keene Rd) from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and a deviation to place landscaping on the inside (south) side of the fence rather than the outside (north) side, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of 2-304.D; and a reduction to the front (west along Mars Ave) landscape buffer from 10 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south along Drew St) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 4.2 ft (to pavement), and reductions to the front (east along N Keene Rd) landscape ,buffer from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 9 ft (to existing building), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Bicycle shop (retail sales and services) with parking] at 1770 Drew St, Woodmere Hts, Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06054 8. Patrick E & Toni V Hickey are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 ft to 63.75 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 16 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.B, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Doctor's office) at 107 McMullen Booth Rd, Sec 16-29-16, M&B 21.05. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07077 9. Two to One LLC (T. Edward Entreken, V.P.) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit the re-establishment of retail sales and services (financial institution) as a primary use within the Office (O) District with a reduction to the side (west) setback from 20 ft to 4.7 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.B, and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4.7 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (north) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (financial institution) and office] at 1825 Sunset Point Rd, Pinellas Groves, Parts of Lots 7 & 8. Assigned Planner: Wa~ne~1-Wei1s~AICP, Planner III. tF3~I32flfl5=07079 • 10. Hamilton Family Trust (Regatta Bay of Clearwater, LLC, Roland Rogers) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 5 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 sq ft to 7,280 sq ft, a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 60 ft, reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 9 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 8 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 77 ft (to top of lighthouse) and a deviation to permit the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (5 condominiums)] at 862 Bayway Blvd, Bayside Sub No 6, Unit C, Blk D, Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07080 11. Clearwater Retail Group LTD is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings as part of a mixed use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (east along S Missouri Ave) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front (north along Druid Rd) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 9.7 ft (to dumpster enclosure) and an increase to building ht from 25 ft to 52.25 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof) with an additional 15.5 ft for a decorative clock tower, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer along Druid Rd from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement and dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (32 condominiums)] at 810 S Missouri Ave, Clearwater Retail, Lot 10. Assigned Planner: ~~yne-M-=We1~s-AICP, Planner III~Fl,-D2005=07076 v Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. • Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMIVIODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 10/02/05 FLD2005-07076, 49 ~ ~ ~ ` A' 1211 DRUID TRUST ALEXANDROS INC 'BATTY, CLARA F vV 63~ CLEVELAND ST 100 PIERCE ST APT 1208 1214 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8489 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4214 BAKRIWALA, JASHWANTLAL H BERGEN, CHRISTOPHER CHAMBERLAIN, MERLE M BAKRIWALA, JYOTSNA J 1208 JASMIN WAY PO BOX 2099 1890 YALE DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4212 HOUSTON TX 77252 - 2099 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1435 CITY-COUNTY EMP CREDIT UN CLEARWATER HOUSING CLEARWATER HOUSING CORP INC 719 S MISSOURI AVE AUTHORITY 210 SO EWING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5916 PO BOX 960 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0960 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition CLEARWATER RETAIL GROUP LTD COSENTINO, SAM Doug Williams, President 6000 LAKE FORREST DR STE 560 COSENTINO, FRANGESCA 2544 Frisco Drive ATLANTA GA 30328 - 3878 10 PINE WAY Clearwater, FL 33761 HAMILTON ON L9A 5K2 00030 - CANADA DEAN, SANDRA L DELOSEVIC, FEHIM DINIC, BRANKO THE 1224 DRUID RD E DELOSEVIC, ZENEPA T DINIC, VIDA THE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4210 1223 JASMINE WAY 1320 GOLFVIEW DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4211 BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1538 E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., Johnson, E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., Johnson, FLORES, JOSE A Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 1214 JASMINE WAY P.O. Box 1368 911 Chestnut St CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4212 Clearwater, FL 33757 Clearwater, FL 33757 GISS, RONALD A GOLOMB & BURNS REALTY INC HAKKY, SAID ISMAIL 1002 PINE ST BURNS, CHRISTINE 709 MISSOURI AVE S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5624 1122 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5916 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4100 HEALTH CARE R E I T INC HEJNA, JOANNE HIDDEN OAKS APT INC 1 SEAGATE STE 1500 1220 MAGNOLIA DR 7641 CUMBERLAND RD TOLEDO OH 43603 - CLEARWATER FL 33756- 4214 LARGO FL 33777 - 2007 HINKLE, BARBARA G KELLY, DONALD A LEPEAK PROPERTIES LLC 1234 DRUID RD KELLY, EMILY M 7 S PINE CIR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4210 1226 JASMINE WAY BELLEAIR FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4212 M I F INVESTMENTS INC MADISON GLEN REAL ESTATE LLC MARKOU, MICHAEL 44 SUNSET BAY DR 701 MADISON AVE S MARKOU, (LIANA BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1643 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 44 SUNSET BAY DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1643 MARTIN, GEORGE MARYS ANGELS OF MC NAMARA, MOLLIE M MARTIN, GARY CLEARWATER LLC 1217 JASMINE WAY 3609 OCITA DR 724 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4211 ORLANDO FL 32837 - 7227 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - MC NAMARA, ROSE J 1209 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4211 MISSONIS, PAUL J MISSONIS, MARY H 625 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5914 RENNER, WILLIAM F 1227 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4211 SUGGS, RAY SUGGS, CAROL A 11400 HARBOR WAY # 1635 LARGO FL 33774 - 3757 WOODRING, MARILYN C TRUST WOODRING, MARILYN C THE 1399 PINEAPPLE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 2314 MICCICHE, MARIE MICCICHE, FRANK 83 CLOVER AVE FLORAL PARK NY 11001 - 2530 NICHOLS, PETER 624 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5915 RUBIO, OSCAR 1217 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4201 TAIT, ROBERT J TAIT, HELEN 700 MISSOURI AVE S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5917 MILLER, JAMES H MILLER, ELLEN M 434 22ND ST BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3415 OLE FOLKS PARTNERS 1303 MORTON DR DALTON GA 30720 - 3943 SANTO, CYNTHIA S SANTO, SHARON S 1222 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4212 WARD, ROBERT C WARD, ANN D 1253 PARK ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5827 LAW OFFICES RICHARDS, GILKEY, FITE, SLAUGHTER, PRATESI 8~ WARD, P.A. RICHARDS BUILDING 1253 Park Street Clearwater, FL 33756 ------------------------- (727) 4433281 Fax: (727) 447-8830 RALPH RICXARDS (1893-1980) JOXN D. FITE (7933-2000) JOHN E. SLAUGHTER, JR. EMIL G. PRATESI R. CARLTON WARD THEO J. KARAPHILLIS BRIAN FETTIG OF COUNSEL WILLIAM W. GILKEY PATRICK W. RINARD October 5, 2005 City of Clearwater Attn: Michael Delk, Planning Director PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: Application of Clearwater Retail Group, Ltd. for flexible development approval Dear Michael: As an owner of adjacent property within 200 feet of the subject property, I am in support of their requested application. Very truly y s, .Carlton Ward R,C W/clan cc: Ed Armstrong Russ Kasper I r ~~ ~~ t ~ ~-sue -} _,_,~ p~NNt~N ~ ELOPMENT t SERVICES Ct"-' CAF c;LGARWATER .. __~