The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2005-10080FLS2005-10080 107 LEEWARD ISLAND REISS, KENNETH PLANNER OF RECORD: S K ATLAS # 267B ZONING: IEOD LAND USE: RU RECEIVED: 10/03/2005 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet r -~i f 100 South t l Clearwater Planning D~ Clearwater, Telephone: Fax: 727-5E f casE #: FLS~DD.~-' ng~ DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: _ SOUTH: WEST: EAST: ai~cn 647~y~+~!'+9TIryfNd~-s J SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND N A ~.~~~ .J SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans :] SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ~c)G ~/ NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~1.A) A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-2 ~ ~ ~S APPLICANT NAME: `~~~~ ~/ ~ ~~l MAILING ADDRESS: / ~ ~ O ~ Ov ~J ~/ ~_q ~ `~ ` \ PHONE NUMBER: ~~ / ~( ~ ~~Z ~ FAX NUMBER`._~`~J~1__~`{'I~.~J ~ ~~°"' ~~ ~i ~~~i~ . PROPERTY OWNER(S): ~~/I ~ `~ / o/ ,( ~<~ ~ ` / ed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) de (Must include ALL owners as listed on the AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: f1[`T !1 v-z PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: ~d ~~~~ CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: rIN (1~~~~ I~~~~ .A) FORMATION: (C~de Section 4-202 N B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT I / / ~ STREET ADDRESS of subject site:~~- ! ~ ~ `~~~~ ~~ ~S C.._. ~' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (if not listedphere, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: D C ~ ~Z ~ I S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O U U U ~ ~- C-~ PARCEL SIZE: IZ ~ ~ U `~~ ` (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): ~ YZ ~ -~S ~ L~~~~ ~~ (number of dwelling units, el rooms or square footage nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): ~rlrl3/,Gl/~~,Df-D~f~ ~S 9~-oU~1~ ~clii~//.G~i ~ ~ , ~' d Auach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (includ II requ sted code deviations; e.g. r coon in required number of parking space ~ ~~c~ T 3G `~ ~~~ ~ 's7;' ~ ~,' ecific use. etc ~ s~ 6 ~d ,~ Q Page 1 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (T,D,R'~ A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. y ~ l/~/ - d ~/ -G~ GC/ Si~ ~ ~' t ~fP ~~ ~.~5 ~~-~` ~ G t ~, 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. / ~ ~ „ /~ ~ ~ l~ l ~ ~. ~s~ -f- ,~~ 6,P ~~ ~~ -c S 3. The proposed development will of adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. A / ~j/ ~l. l Q 3 LU~S ~~ °//-~ T PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character/of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ~1 ~ ,,/ /~ ,, ~ ~ ~,~- ~ / .~4dd~~L~7 /rte S ^ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: Page 2 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater c. ~oRi~~uA~ - E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem~, to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shalt provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control p-an including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. _ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included hr stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall tie provided CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ~~~~® All dimensions; ~~ v Nort~ari ow; _ En veering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; cation map; OCT 0 3 2005 Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings9 nd structures; P1~-NNING DEPARTMENT _ Foot rint and size of all PROPOSED buildin sand structures; All required setbacks; CITY OF CLEARWATER All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 3 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ _ Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; - _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ^ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surtace ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ^ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 YZ X 11) and color rendering if possible; ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All. open space areas; _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) '~ „ _ ~!l :~~ ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; OL~ n 3 Z~05 Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; CITY OF CLEARWATER Proposed and required parking spaces; _ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbo- or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; _ Location, size, and quantities of afl existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. O REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11) (color rendering if possible); ^ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 4 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater • FROM :STYLISTIC DESIGN CUSTOM HL~ FAX N0. :727 849 7834 ~. 13 2005 03:05AM P3 a '~ AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORfZE AGENT: owners on peso - i~/` '{, That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location}: ~ ~ tit/ ~ L~- Z, That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe repass!} _ a ~ s'T~ ~7- ~- ,tea a C_ ~ ~-G~ ~ ~ /q~d U ~ C~ jc ~ 5 '7"~ .rJ 3- That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary t0 affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to Consider and act on the above described properly; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by Gty representatives In order to process this applicatwn and the owner authorizes Clty representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/We), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing i5 tru® and Correct- ' ~ /~ , Property Owner S'~',ATL OF FLORIDA, COUNTY n>: p~ '.`.~ - f i. LLS ~ S~iOL(G~ Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the la+n~of the State of Florida, on thf - ~~ ~ day of personally appeared ~~l't ~ ~ who havi n first duly s m Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of-t a affidavit the elshe si /~ Linde A f3rlto v ~ .. • My Commissi DD133570 Notary Public My Gommission Expires: ~a ~' ~~ qugust 2 , OCT 0 3 2005 S1Planning DspBrtmentl,4pplication FormS\tlevelOpmenl rsviexlfisxible Standard developmerft BppNcailDn 20p5.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 6 of 6 - plexlble Standard Development Application 20dS-City of Clearwater FROM :STYLISTIC DESIGN CUSTOM H~ FAX N0. :727 849 7834 ~. 13 2 ~~~ C ~ A L 3 I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-2~2.A.23) - ~ Required In the event the application Includes a development where design standards are in Issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown 13istrlcfs) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; O REDUCI=D BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to saela (8 i4 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if passible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-9806) J~ J ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attacnad signs; Provide photographs an dimensions (area, height, 6tC-), indicate yvha[hgr th®y wilt be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs sha11 include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee requited). ~~~~(i~~ i] 1 p Reduced signage proposal (8 %s X 11) {color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application- [~ ~/ ®~1 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.93 and 4-801.c> p~p(~NING ~EPARTMEN D . Include if required by the 7ra4fiC Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the pro developmenk CITY OF CLEARWATER Wil! degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in thA C mprehensive Plan. • WIII generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/OP 1000 o~ more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prioriwelve (12) month period or that i5 on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition pf the Institute of Transportation Engineers (I7E) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Departments Development Review Manager or their designee {7Z7-5t32~750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one Of the following): Traffic Impact Study Is included. The study must inotude a summary table of pre- and post~ievelopment levels of service for all roadway le and_each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping M~eting- f.:. ` ~ ~, ~firaffic Impact Study is not required- CAUTION - IF APPLICATION RE1/IEW RESULTS tN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS B1=EN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND. SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727}562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OFD cf~U ~ ~~ S rJClp'T1~00subscribed before me this ~~ c A.D. 20 to ma a c who is personalty ow produced ,.~~j c-~ of by I, the undersigned, acknowledge that alt representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatkves to visit and photograph the property deBCribed in this appll tlon. S~gnatura of property owner or representative - r Lind~A Brtto / otary pu IIC, ~ tuty Commission DD1 My commission e~ires: ~A_ ~' cvrvrwsA~~eust23.2 as Page 5 of 6 - Flerdble Standard Development Application 2005- Clty of Clearwater r • "~ ~ FLS2005-10080 107 LEEWARD ISL 1 Date Received: 10/03/2005 REISS, KENNETH ~~~~~~~~ ac i ~ Foos PIANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ZONING DISTRICT: IEOD LAND USE : RU ATLAS PAGE: 267B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED ' `LW CoverSheet S'i't" ~'I`~ ~ Receipt #: 1200500000000009875 ~ ~= ~ Date: 10/03/2005 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description FLS2005-10080 02 Flex Std-Residential Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Contirm No How Received Amount Paid CreditCard M REISS R_D ..~~ t~ V is 528855 In Person Payment Total: ~ n[~( l~~f ~ c~ WW ~ ~ tv ~~ eA Q W W ~ ( ~ F~-- ~ . ~ L1. Q ~ ~ F a V THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 10/3/2005 1:31:42PM Revenue Account No Amount Paid 010-341262 Line Item Total: 100.00 $100.00 100.00 $100.00 cReceipt.rpt 0 ~_ earwater U November 10, 2005 Kenneth P Reiss 11 San Marco St Apt 308 Clearwater, F133767 ~,ITY OF CLEA~WATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICII'AL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM RE: FLS2005-10080 -- 107 LEEWARD ISL 1 -- Letter of Completeness Dear Kenneth P Reiss The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-10080. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on December 08, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4567x2504 or Scott.Kurleman@myclearwater. com. Sincerely yours, ~/ C~,~~~ Scott Kurleman Planner II Letter of Completeness - FLS2005-10080 - 107 LEEWARD ISL 1 LL ITY OF CLEA~WATER ° earWater PLANNING DEPARTMENT '_ MUNICII'AL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW ATER. C OM November 03, 2005 Kenneth P Reiss 11 San Marco St Apt 308 Clearwater, Fl 33767 RE: FLS2005-10080 -- 107 LEEWARD ISL 1 -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Kenneth P Reiss The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-10080. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. Please acknowledge Section E regarding stormwater requirements. 2. Please provide a signed and sealed survey per section F. --~._ Please provide a tree survey per Section F. 4. Please provide a Site Data Table per Section G. Include land area in square feet and detailed ISR calculations. ~, Please acknowledge Traffic Impact Study per Section K. 6. Provide existing grade elevations every 18 inches in the rear of the proposed structure. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Thursday November 10, 2005 @ Noon. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4567x2504 or Scott.Kurleman@myclearwater. com. Sincerely yours, ~'~~ c;~~ Scott Kurleman Planner II Letter oflncompleteness - FLS2005-10080 - 107 LEEWARD ISL 1 ' ~xtf~y~Arr~r ~~ ~+ r+` e. i i t { / •~ Y~A~ ""'''~~ 1~ ~~ .~~~xE.A~y~+ conditions Associated With FLS2005-10080 107 LEEWARD ISL 1 General Applicability Criteria #1 Scott Kurleman 562-4567x2504 11 /03/2005 Clarify. How is the elevated ppol and reduced rear setback in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties? Reply to each seperately. Met General Applicability Criteria #2 Scott Kurleman 562-4567x2504 11/03/2005 Clarify. How will the elevated pool and reduced rear setback not discourage or hinder the Met appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof? General Applicability Criteria #3 Scott Kurleman 562-4567x2504 11/03/2005 Clarify. How will the elevated pool and reduced rear setback not adversely affect the health or Met safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood? General Applicability Criteria #4 Scott Kurleman 562-4567x2504 11/03/2005 Clarify. How is the elevated pool and reduced rear setback designed to minimize traffic Met congestion? General Applicability Criteria #5 Scott Kurleman 562-4567x2504 11/03/2005 Clarify. How is the elevated pool and reduced rear setback consistent with the community Met character of the immediate vicinity? General Applicability Criteria #6 Scott Kurleman 562-4567x2504 11/03/2005 Clarify. How does the elevated pool and reduced rear setback minimize adverse effects, including Met visual, acoustic, olfactory, and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties? Reply to each seperately. Zoning Condition Scott Kurleman 562-4567x2504 11/03/2005 Need project value $. Met 11/03/2005 Please respond to criteria 2-1602.1.c. regarding reductions in the rear setback. Met 11/03/2005 Please acknowledge Section E regarding stormwater requirements. Not Met 11/03/2005 Please provide a signed and sealed survey per section F. Not Met 11/03/2005 Please provide a tree survey per Section F. Not Met 11/03/2005 Please provide a Site Data Table per Section G. Include land area in square feet and detailed Not Met ISR calculations. 11/03/2005 Please acknowledge Traffic Impact Study per Section K. Not Met 11/03/2005 Provide existing grade elevations every 18 inches in the rear of the proposed structure. Not Met Print Date: 11/03/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 o In' 20' SCALE J = 10.0' -la"c .q_.. ^ F~ .. ~ ~ ... ti . ~. .. ~PRV2R AARON f/) O ? C 11 b ~ ~ y ~~ b; AG • aCPFS qt=qIA [OwFIIONEN AlU)1=PLUFIINUPI aVE.•gVf;;UF BlOG.•BUROING &N=eLDDc mw.•POULEVaRo pgor.•RacNOwr t•raagaTFn rt• amEUNrt ED•aaxn bunRJG ~_ d * o :C r a. W~~ u ~ m~ ~ ~~ ~. - - BENCH MARK P.K. NAIL IN PowER PBLE ELEV. = 5.75' (NAND) ABBREVIATIONS CU."(XOgO piSFN~YE EICt=EIFCfRIC CE •COVER[D [NIRY EIEV,=EIEYgiION CONC • (ON[PEIE ELY. GSILRLY C/G=CONCRCIE SGb ENCI"EN(LOSUPE COR=RWJEn EOP•FDGE Op DAV[r1ENT CURB SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST BEARING BASIS ESTABLISHED FROM: THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 22 N 88° 30' 37" E N 83° 26' 23" E N 88° 30' Ol" E `° 3~4e ( OPEN PIPE m~le r ~CORC ' oRlvE~ F~I LBT 22~ r`PgVFRED ' DRIVEy ~ 4~- ~~C ~chNC. ~N nnrvey FA,. L07' 23 I RESIDENCE FINISHEDD F~R ELEV. x5.92' ,- FFnlrx , (") POWER POLE 1NOZ ~~ ~'- S 88 °38' S9" E zZ 0 o ~ 0 _ V IOT 20 RESIDENCE w w m FINISHED FLOOR ELEV. = 6.02' 3 ~ ~ O ~o w^ .v COV.•COVEAED EGXi.•EASEMEM P.R.M. n.•cwgr Flro=Frgq+o 4"ROUND DM: ~PAINgGE REfFYfIOn ANFA M.Ql•I~d FOR LF55 CONC. MONUMENT e. n.~=rnwrcncE nlcnr~or'War N•xpgnl WfIH NAIL rllY • NORiXEALY OUL•OVERHGD UnLEIY UNE IUU"AAOIUS W.=WESr O.AB•OFFlCIal P£COPDDOON DIaTOWS PB PEG"PFSIIXNCE RHG •Mt<GE 1VLY.•IYEGRILLY YIM •\'IRNESS .• D[,=PDIMOF CUPVgnME . Mv.. PIWImoFWnY . =N.OIiE OR lE55(a pLaa mMn) jtD.•PERPIgXENTEDNIPU.I'dnT G.•SOUDI ••DEGIEES D.1.••rO1NI UP INIFRS[CR0;1 0.T." IEAt.'rER SCR•$CREFNED SFC.• SECnON MItNROSVMFN USED IN AtANNGS ' • SFDDnDS WHEN 15[D IN bflAlr(GS Po0.•POINTOF O[GINNING PAC.•DOit?OF R[VEASE CURVE EI.V.•SOM2PLY TINIJS.•TApIJS(OPMtIt '•fELT lV11FN UFFD IN DISrghCES "=INCHES\M1D/USED IN DISfaNLFS Ircal.•P[PMPNEM RLICPCHC[MONUMENI' 'RVR•rOL'M115111P NnVO•NOIIRI gM[PIUNVEPTICAL DATUM q.• PECORD 1YP• TYPIGL a r oml ~ ~ ~ '~ w,. ~ -BASIS OF BEARINGS 9,96' r ~NCE 3. THE NORTH 12'- OF LOT 20 i~~INDWARD PASSAGE SITE PLAN SCPLE~ 1' 10'-0' ~.;1 u~ ~,~~ P.EVISIDtJS IIY DESCRIPTION: THE NORTH 12 FEET OF LOT 20 A'ND ALL OF LOT 22, "UNIT 1 ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 44, PAGES 61 THRU 63, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELIAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~ - 1•~ o P~' •,. ~ . ~' €~ ' a~. ALL. ~ u e~~YN Q w ~ ~~ it ~~ _...~__ yy 0 4'~~~ nR ~~ 11 ``'X3'7~~ wn „nyqq~~ "L $~~~ ~ a~~ ~~m r 5 ~~~1~~6 a * _F.~ Eet$s~ ;~ ~ LINE DATA: ~€~s a~ LINE 1: _ S. 00° 27' 30" E. (C) 12.00' S ~ 00° 01.' 12" E. (M) 1 1.92' eB.a, 4 . LEGEND C.B. = N. 00° 26' 49" W. (M) ~, y J s°EDnG°E rwrmncxr 6 _ ` 5 ___J~a.P ^ rour.ncpxcnnerwnuaaNr W " ~ u ° z'-- o FDHrNNNI RAD. = 150.00' , nee ~ ``~1 ~L ulCl:: ~ ; ~~ 3 IP~vERSv , p ~ %"~ ~;~""'' 05°~ .0~0 53 0 5~ \` ~~~ I F9. ~ SET IIA'IRD'1 POD l0.Y916J CURVE DATA: CURVE 1: RAD. = 6070.00' ARC. = 97.00' C.D'. = 97.00' (C) 97,10' (M) C•B. = N. 00° 21' 10" W, (C) ~ ° -m 1 a ~ u ~ w rr '- Jw r g ~ ° ; ° a ~ ? ~ 5 x F ~ ~ °' ~ ~ F~F oa ~ CURVE 2: ~ ~ GErxaE bDlv:aNlea ~ ED lounpn'ap ' R~'~ ~' ~ uxnnlpuuMErcr ARC. = 65.00 g "78 "~e C.D. = 64.49' (R) 64.37 (M) 5¢ ¢R~~^ M~ ~~~ ~ C.B. = S. 30° 39' 05" E. (R) „ , €na~~~° I C.B. = S. 30° 24' S4" E. (M) ~ "-~~g~.g~F R ~~ " ~A~ 1 r :.^: NOTE: (2 p a ~gl'c~s~ t t THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "AE" ~ ~~P`~~o~ WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATI ' ~ ~ ON OF 11.0 ACCORDING TO MAP NUMBER 12103C0102G, DATED SEPT. 3 2003. ~ ~$ ~M ~ r6c~~xa~s " , Dwell B;aaa Q 6F~lP-Bwd NOTE: -- ~ - ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAND 1988. ~wX nmFD rwrE: fhnlbrrs vamsn lnus OD/ELEV. ae ha5ftl an NOPM MIEPIGN VEP.Ii[M OANM. NOTE: UrVets Mhmw're MaLLb Ux!pmperrydearptYVrMmn M1SeanrvasumMrd Ey 0.ed. xOTE: Move grw:rO imYVlYnmri-+IlWUtt9 b~Mrg vvnlulws lmrv!m!Nrn bWeO ra.¢Yq es snx+m hmm~.., •"^ n'N -. ftplE: Utkp •q MiWa!fixvr inymvemerlS, IntlWlnp lwMasu,<, he\eMlumbalM Ma.nrnes. not C, mN Mle pten xa[pmpamO vnNM Ae berla0(dallHe savr<xpM maV he suh;ed to h halms iwiE:lA;s AUOtl UMemdnnllpn is LVSeUmlln ibDU lmuarlm Rate Flap, FWaal FverAOYy Cnumnnl,NAM-vl,naya,nM Nltt malnsM rcNN. --- Munegemen;ggenry. RRSdeternYnpUUr tlves mElmVry Nat Ule rnfurcnn:U property NOI F: Alar lv sunlraaion blU/or lCllvrcn ml PUptl aarc nMC, IOn humAnA dep:lUrnn:ll vnll Cr will na[bC lrcn hom nppdnAmtlvmayr., WDpeM lHa spe[Ml Rvvtl lrururU may he tlamageU bpRllo-aU Areetm Nen lMl meOktM ml Ule E.I.RIM1 mlruyl !uv'UbmnldtkUla vnNllraUald Natlp;n. NOTE 3'llrc Vmu'Msl»INI h3evn mev d: sJJeaEbthe m'es, reNbMlaX, mdnam.CS aIJ/ Iadl UralnaAe prahlCm nplshw.mmlk map. m's Ueleminatial UVesn0l bCSre wjuUxl;[ACIIS V'4xdl sN:eerv)/ur (eU:ral aAMtles. mSrCraimrvda 'sa'U IIaYAtymlhe peRd NSm'CWRY, drarrydfmruanyempby eADm01, IBr any run,rCAVluhvps.mA'rmrltesarvl/vr ll;a llnHSdsaM lalfUiNVn; are rml sl+nvn tlanxpC lM1rt msuRS Fan IMr[e pn Nls CdMlmaUm. I 2S Ito be (Codes: bottom ht above HE for his d. Structural pracmg the ~ the of ~Iding. In _, ~~. Clearwater Beach, Clearwater, Florida Q a~ U- m ~('Icartc:rt<~r B.cach lsL•urcl G u f f o f M e x i c o a ~. ~~ ~ . n; s 699 z55 _~ ~ ~ Q --d ~ ~ ~7 ~ O ~ rum ~.s ° ~ m ~ grant ,-ti Field ~ ~; > 345 '~'. ~ Dunedin °' Orangewood Or <' U rn Union St z.. Alt ~ Z y 19 C7 ~ ' ~. 2 cn: ~ c, ~ cn: v _ ~ ~ ~ . i O . . n: ~ ~ s ~ .D a- co 57 6 D m j N ~' ° o. o~ GL d . o ~c a~ D .. . ~ _ _ Reiss Residence _-- ---~ -~ 107 L ---_ ~ ~ ~ h~ ~ ~ eeward Island Clearwater B h FL I ` ~ 0 60 ~ ~ °' eac , 33767 -----------_...---._ _ .... ~ ;c" .` O v ~/ ~ r 355 ~ ~, 375 ~~, ~ so at Cq ~. = 2 i and Passage ~ D ;~ c Z ~ :~ 548 X ~ Seminole St . ~~ ~ Alt ~ Clearwater >. Q.`. Bay~ao Or ~o~~a/ 19 D Jacksor- Rd` ccl hrv 245 Cd~sewa ~ St 590 Clearwater 590 .Y p Gleveland.:St so z:~ Park St Pierce St Pierce- Sf Franklin St~. 183 >Chestnut' St > Court. StCourt St 651 sa~arkey ~ Turner SY ~ Turner St ~ ~ ~ Turner St . m n ~ Druid 'Rd E Alt ~ 0 375 19 Q a o see Jeffords: 5t' °' ~ ~ T _'~ Jeffords ;St Belleair Pinellas' St ~ cn 0 mi 0.5 r~ 1 _f rT nom. E N N ~~ r~ ~T M ~T N CV X CL • L J E 0 ....1 ~..~/ 0 ~C }iUSS~RL, 1~f.'91GI~1 CaF00ul~,, .xOOS ~'^!i N crJ Cs #~--- C, W ~ ~~ Q W L1.A Q O ~~ ~U a SDLEW PATFRII SUnE AS TYP. NOTE: AlL NCTAI RMTER9 # JOISTS IWLL SECTION ROOF fL51LING @ Ib" O.C. SPACING. pnTIERN$ (S6E TTp. V+1LL 5(CTIgJS SHEET qOF Ib). TILE RODi OVER RO~ImT vAPICD OwR bV DRt~IN mBP. I/2'H~RF (W) RYNaO I.4 METAL WFffRi fLRSWfD M Y CEMtvi B0.1R0 m AtTAI ~ PIBPS >+/g~ " 1 I/4' iMK PAVERS 7e6 METAL RIDGES WLV.SLRCWS OVER I/i"GfMENi HURD E(RCWED TD METAL QV SAND 6E0 ¢.4 METAL JDIYT w( IV ^SELf TnpIN4 METAL S1uD scRCW5 RAFTERS .__! --IOJL ftORTER iDGE PAVER DECk-~- iD K.O, SLLYK SCREWF9 TO RAFTER- ._ ~ M2Rm - . wYS~PAecS cOtt GEM6NTAT10J5 ~R fni LKOD lYN C ' R ' ' ' 1x4 MRAI STVpI}1S LIP T O D H ovb mP R. ' ~ R Cz^PLY.vD(SF6 T+P. Wu FE In05ft nLL SCGilONS SnE ~} qOF ILI SCRCW O %Ib KNU.K-WT SLCCK B xB Wk ley RESAP. CD\'T. Y S T C S R 9T PnTieftn SAME A•STYp. Iw,u SEC li0N>, _ " Hq'S_GLIp C ~+ OVER Ill"LEMENf HDARD 1 BLREWBb IF OVER 31"DOWEL STEPS°OPT. `""~ - TD M.fNL STDDS TJ METAL fTNDS. DD•+I~ AIE -t %'-0•o,C-IVERL) o L-.l._. ircaf s R..~R+RRS O 'F y'~q~ ' 6"mIN)~ ------ ~ L (~ ,:~DL, E~.da::.- n + c .Rr ."..";" v.x _- INTERMEDIATE ~\ " ~ i> '~m0 ~~ vn ~ 4t uWSenineu 1 ] B'%6'Xi6'NNOCX-0Ui >$ . '.. I . : ~ ~ \~Ie~/ HLOCN NM1 p5 FEHAR ~ COPT. ~'~~ (2) R5 REEA.R CDV? Dr 5 ~ L ~~ nltir~s CV! "3 k'IRE TuaIRS 20~ RIXA P 51 CCdYC c"L ~.aa. Ml ire. . . . ~1AETd~ININO ~ ° IALL A`f POOL ` O ~~ pL 12 SCALE: J/A'.I'-0' ®Gi~~ 5~N¢GREO- 1 I LO.O IC IxK!E5 a' o" REAR ELEVATION 'i4"° I`0° F~`LNL 5EG11(YJ ~VWf~~Q~ Q:C91NfltdEV EEC OCJE ~S:N. ,~I .. ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ W W ~ Q N ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~''J W O 6. F ~U ,o All TRIM FrN05 TO 8F P.C. CONC. U~N.D.LTYF+~ Ief FIN.FLR~ , REL5510M5 Dr U .,~ p ? h•.x ~. mp~iy U t~~ ~''! Z ~ Rx m ~ a m ~~ Q ~ ~ ~ &'£I III ~ F • III r5;x di ~~ ~y Y~~ re 8 ~;6''~ %~~, ~ ~`~ ssa~~~ N= C6.=_.v~ c rc ~ o _ = f- ~a ~ n Y - _ o~3P~¢SE~Y q~3~~8G ~ ~ @„Wz~~~a~r 4 a~ A~a~~r 3 S ~tae~~~z p~'~3u'~'3~ ~ p, ogRK~F H q ?~:r~g~i;? n saR"ik~~$ n"I~ J-D5 sme Morro mo»R BH IJNI 0)1505 Yltet Pinellas County Property Apprais~Information: 08 29 15 43308 000 0220 Page 2 of 3 • 08 ! 29 / 15 ~ 4308 ~ 400 / 0220 03-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:35:00 Ownership Information Vacant Property Use and Sales REISS, KENNETH P OBK: 13658 OPG: 1000 11 SAN MARCO ST APT 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767-2060 EVRC: A EVAC Comparable sales value as Prop Rddr; 0 of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 260.01 sales from 2003 - 2004; 575,400 Sale Date OR BookJPage Price {Qua!/UnQ} Vac/Imp Plat Information 6 12,004 13,658!1,000 675,000 {U} I 1957: Book 044 Pgs 062-063 5 12,002 12,02212,591 5$0,000 {Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 5 12,002 12,022!2,641 580,000 {U} I 0000: Book Pgs - 4 /2,001 11,315!1,065 429,000 {U} I 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 463,600 Homestead; NO Ownership ~ .000 Govt Exem; NO Use ~: 1.004 AssessedlCap; 463,600 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt ~: .000 Historic Exem; 0 Taxable; 463,600 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View; 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 10,772.77 1} 7$ x 128 6, 500.00 78.00 F Special Tax . 00 2} 12 x 110 2, 300. 00 12. 00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 lJithout the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be ; 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 10, 772.77 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 LJithout any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 10, 772. 77 Short Legal ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATE R UNIT i Description LOT 22 & FI 12FT OF LOT 20 Building Information ~~6~ j ~ Z~ /!~~~ http://pao.co.Pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=08+29+15+4... 11 /3/2005 Pinellas County Property Apprais~Information: 08 29 15 43308 000 0220 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 08 / 29 / 15 1 43308 / 000 / 0220 Page 3 of 3 03-NoV-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:35:00 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 290 Land Use: 00 Vac ant Extra Feature s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} BOATHS/CV 14X26 10.00 364 0 2,370 1,993 2} BT LFT/UAU .00 1 0 0 1,988 3} BT LFT/UAU 6, 500.00 1 0 3, 510 i, 988 4} DOCK 43$SF 20.00 438 0 7,800 2,001 5} , OQ 0 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 13,680 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=08+29+15+4... 11/3/2005 -ro OYIr. ~ 14,E le«wn, ~ p ~~r~ov~ D r~ DEC 0 2 20~ ~p~gNE7 cES NE~I~~~Ii~OE~ARW A~~p _ ... - -- .. .. 2_. -... ..,.-_.___...._ _. _. ------~? ~~~ ~ ~ l~.. _l~~~ars~ _~I~__~No~ Vii, ~,t ~ ~.. _~__ ~. .~ __ __.._._. _--,- ~ n-- - --- - ._--- _ _ ---- .-.___ 11~__~..w o~cl __~.5 • LL CITY OF CLEARWATER ° earwat~r PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-476 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM November 16, 2005 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 107 LEEWARD ISL 1 (FLS2005-10080) To Surrounding Property Cwners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 107 LEEWARD ISL 1, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the rear (east) waterfront setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and to increase the pool height from 12 inches to 36 inches above existing grade per Section 2-1602.. On December 08, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be December 08, 2005. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562-4567x2504 orScott.Kurleman@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on December 08, 2005. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, :with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, /"~/~ colt Kurleman Planner II Letter of Notification - FLS1005-10080 - 107 LEEWARD ISL 1 T2c 05 05 11:24a J~McCleary 952 ~ 9jt~ (~ ~ j'~ ~~(j ~p. ~~~ ~ 5 205 ~ 1 12/5/OS '"£~~"~0~g ~a~wnT~~Es To: Scott Kurleman -Planner II, City of Clearwater Planning Department Fm: Jim McCleary -owner of 350 Windward Passage, Clearwater Re: Application for Flexible Standard Development -107 Leeward, Cl ter I received, via forwazded mail, your notification dated 11/16/05 and postmarked 11/22/05, in my primary residence Minnesota mailbox on 12/3!05. This is only four working days before the hearing on this subject. Fortunately I was in Minnesota and not Florida or somewhere else to receive it, and able to an~ange the time on short notice to respond to it. Otherwise I would have missed the hearing altogether. That would not have been good for either of us as you will see below_ I immediately called you this morning, and have not received a response so I have crafted this response without being able to discuss the matter with you. Forgive me if there are errors for that reason. I believe that this matter applies to the property immediately adjacent to mine, to the right as one faces the water, although I am not certain as the property is on another street. This property was, I believe, owned by Eric Julian, and subsequently sold to Carmen and Michelle Rowland or their company which is known as something like R & R construction. I object strenuously to his application for the following reasons: 1. When Mr. Rowland purchased the non-waterfront property between Julian's property and mine, he removed the seven foot high, beautiful natural hedge located on my property that provided privacy for both of us to create a view from his rear yard to the inland waterway. T complained to the authorities about the matter. He was in cleaz violation of my rights, but instead of taking action himself to restore my loss, he has shown significant hostility towazd me since. 2. I cooperated with either Mr. Julian and I suppose unknowing with Mr. Rowland by agreeing to a variance that enabled them to install a dock on what I believe is 107 Leeward. They purposefully installed an unnecessary tie pole right in front of my boat slip that is on their side of my dock. That tie pole constitutes a "navigational hazard" for entering my slip. In conversations with William Morris, Hazborrnaster, and reviewing with Section 3-601 of Division 6 of the City codes Community development standards, a tie pole that causes a navigational hazard is clearly disallowed by paragraphs C.1.b and C.8.i.ii. Mr. Roland has laughed at me when I have asked him to remove the tie pole so that I can have clear access to my slip, even though it is completely unnecessary for the use of his new docl~ Mr. Moms has pictures if you wish to see them. 3. Somehow Mr. Rowland arranged with Mr. Julian to split Julian's akeady-narrow waterfront into two tots so that Mr. Rowland could have a view of and access to the waterway. I am not sure whether or not this went through any city process or ti Lac 05 OS 11:24a J~McCleary 95243390 p.2 not. I was never contacted if it was. It would be interesting to know whether this was legally done or not. 4. This new application that you are reviewing seems to me to be highly excessive. Reducing a waterfront setback to only ten feet from two and a half times that much (i.e. 25 feet), on the surface does not seem reasonable. A few inches, perhaps, but this seems like a lot. Also elevating the pool to three times it's present level above grade seems unusual, and perhaps even a bad idea with regard to runoff during a significant storm. How much hard surface would be created by this on the inland waterway side, and how would that affect whatever is left of the house (only one wail as far as I can tell) and my properties and others adjacent? You may reach me at the number I left for you at your convenience. That number is 612- 226-7890. Thank you. PS: Because I was unable to discuss this wish any member of your departrnent, I called the utilities division of the city because they have my correct Minnesota address. As you may know, the Post Office generally refuses to forward any mail after 90 days, and~so it was necessary for them to change their address forme, as it was for the property tax department to get my tax bill tome properly. I asked them how to get my proper address into the hands of all of the city departments. The utilities department told me that because the city does not have a central system, each department must be contacted individually in order for a property owner to get mailings from that department. It seems to me that it would be a good idea for at Ieast your department to receive this information from utilities, otherwise some risk exposure might exist for owners that think they have done everything necessary to protect their interests. You may know that those of us who live Iess than 180 days a year in our second residences in Florida pay a tax premium of about 50%, which amounts to over $5,000 a year in my case. I believe that that amount should offset any costs necessary to protect the interests of part-time residents such as myself. Thanks again for your help and consideration! CLEARWATER 12 5 OS ~1 Lac 05 05 11:25a RE: J~McCleary Cle~ter ~~ November 16, 2005 952 43390 p.3 CITY OF CLEAR WATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT M~Cg'AL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTHMYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX; (727) 562_4576 ~'~/W.MYCLEAR WATER.COM ~~~~~~~ NOTICE OF FILING OF AN AppLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOp~.ZENT APPROVAL AT I07 LEEWARD ISL 1 (FLS2005-I0080) -I~o Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 107 LEEWARD gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Deve opmant a~tY of Clearwater I'lanrtin De pproval to reduce the rear (east) waterfront setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and to increase the pool height from 12 inches to 36 inches above exist~~t per Section 2-1602.. g grade On December 08, 20p5~ the Develo ment Review Commi flee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and deterrrtine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the Ci Development Code. Following that review and detecminiation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approvin , a g ry's Community g pprovin with conditions, or denying the application T}1e eat'liest date that the Ciry will make a decision on the application a~II be December 08, 2005. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562-4567x2504 orScott.Kurleman@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written cocnrnents to be considered in the City/s review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or ne~v information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. however, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. ~ appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or ro e the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on December O8, 2005. Ana p p ~ °wners within Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. g an appeal fee, with the Thank you for your interest in the Ciry of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www,mycleanvater.com. Sincerely yours, So"oft Kur nl~ _ _ " ~..~~ - -- ---- - - - - ~_ TY OF CLEARI~+ATER IIJAG DEN1RI~fEM' OFFfC6 Box 4748 ' ARVlATER. F~oRi~A 3 3 7 58-9748 Mp ~L ~ ¢ ®O® ~ e n r >Il}Y 22'0 5 ®/~ .~`~~~ e Q .Z 9? ~ u VJ ~ C ¢ PBHETSa ~ 1,E264)1, u.s. Pa Thar: ~ . ABC CLEARY', JAMES K 350 ~~'INllWARD PSE CLEARI'~%ATER FL 33767 - 224? MCCL350 337671575 1A05 3A 11/20/05 NOTIFY SENDER OF NEW ADDRESS MCCLEARY 666i HORSESHOE CURV CHANFiH55EN MN 55317-gS26 ~ ..~... Deg. 05 OS 1 1 : 29a J i ~cC 1 eary ~~~,~/% ~ P • 2 ~ ~ ~f ^ ~^,. DEC - 5 2005 r.. I-... ~ 12/$/OS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To: Scott Kurleman --Planner II, City of Clearwate _ 1 I~~~~~_-~R Fm: Jim McCleary -owner of 350 Windward Passage, Clearwater Re: Application for Flexible Standard Development -- 107 Leeward, I received, via forwarded mail, your notification dated 1 i/16/OS and postmarked 11/22/05, in my primary residence Minnesota mailbox on i 2/3/05. This is only four working days before the hearing on this subject. Fortunately I was in Minnesota and not Florida or somewhere else to receive it, and able to arrange the time on short notice to respond to it. Otherwise I would have missed the hearing altogether. That would not have been good for either of us as you will see below. I immediately called you this morning, and have not received a response so I have crafted this response without being able to discuss the matter with you. Forgive me if there are errors for that reason. I believe that this matter applies tv the property immediately adjacent to mine, to the right as one faces the water, although I am not certain as the property is on another street. This property was, I believe, owned by Eric Julian, and subsequently sold to Carmen and Michelle Rowland or their company which is known as something like R & R construction. I object strenuously to his application for the following reasons: 1. When Mr. Rowland purchased the non-waterfront property between Julian's property and mine, he removed the seven foot high, beautiful natural hedge located on my property that provided privacy for both of us to create a view from his reaz yazd to the inland waterway. I complained to the authorities about the matter. He was in clear violation of my rights, but instead of taking action himself to restore my lass, he has shown significant hostility towazd me since. 2. I cooperated with either Mr. Julian and I suppose unknowing with Mr. Rowland by agreeing to a variance that enabled them to install a dock on what I believe is 107 Leeward. They purposefully installed an unnecessary tie pole right in front of my boat slip that is on their side of my dock. That rie pole constitutes a `navigational hazard" far entering my slip. In conversations with William Morris, Harbormaster, and reviewing with Section 3-601 of Division 6 of the City codes Community development standards, a tie pole that causes a navigational hazard is clearly disallowed by paragraphs C.1.b and C.8.i.ii. Mr. Roland has laughed at me when I have asked him to remove the tie pole so that I can have clear access to my slip, even though it is completely unnecessary for the use of his new dock. Mr. Morris has pictures if you wish to see them. 3. Somehow Mr. Rowland arranged with Mr. Julian to split Julian's already-narrow waterfront into two lots so that Mr. Rowland could have a view of and access to the waterway. I am not sure whether or not this went through any city process or Dec 05 05 1 1 : 29a J i m~cC l eary 95743390 p . 3 not. I was never contacted if it was. It would be interesting to know whether this was legally done or not. 4. This new application that you are reviewing seems to me to be highly excessive. Reducing a waterfront setback to only ten feet from two and a half times that much (i.e. 2S feet), on the surface does not seem reasonable. A few inches, perhaps, but this seems like a lot. Also elevating the pool to three times it's present level above grade seems unusual, and perhaps even a bad idea with regard to runoff during a significant storm. How much bard surface would be created by this on the inland waterway side, and how would that affect whatever is left of the house {only one wall as far as I can tell) and my properties and others adjacent? You may reach me at the number I left for you at your convenience. That number is 612- 226-7890. Thank you. PS: Because I was unable to discuss this with any member of your department, I called the utilities division of the city because they have my correct Minnesota address. As you may know, the Post Office generally refuses to forward any mail after 90 days, and so it was necessary for them to change their address far me, as it was for the property tax department to get my tax bill to me properly. l asked them how to get my proper address into the hands of all of the city departments. The utilities department told me that because the city does not have a central system, each department must be contacted individually in order for a property owner to get mailings from that department. It seems to me that it would be a goad idea far at least your department to receive this information from utilities, otherwise some risk exposure might exist for owners that think they have done everything necessary to protect their interests. You may know that those of us who live less than 180 days a year in our second residences in Florida pay a tax premium of about SO%, which amounts to aver $5,000 a year in my case. I believe that that amount should offset any costs necessary to protect the interests of part-time residents such as myself. Thanks again for your help and consideration! CLBARWATER 12 5 OS Ibec 05 OS 11:30a Ji~cCleary 4 RE: Cle~ter ~~ November 16, 2005 95243390 p. 4 - ... CrTY OF CLEA,RVt'ATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH A4YRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 ~~~MYCLEARWATER.COM ~~ ~ ~, ~~ NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVEL0PIVTENT APPROVAL AT I07 LEEWARD ISL 1 (FI-S2005-10080) f o Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of I07 LEEW - gives notice that an application for Flexible StandardD ve opment approval to reduce the rear (east) waterfront setback from 25 feet to ] 0 feet and to increase the pool height from 12 inches o 36 inches abo~ ~pa~ent per Section 2-1602„ existing grade On December 08, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the Ci review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the Ci Development Code. Fallowing that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issae aal staff) K711 Development Order approvin , g ry's Community, the City will make a decision on the application will be December pg~ 905pPltcation. The earliest date that The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. you may contact me at 562-4567x2504 orScott.Kurleman@myclearwater com for f wruten comments to be considered in the Cittrther information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit may submit additional or new information regarding this case;awhich you m lease lie advised that the applicant hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. y review during regular business the required noes eearea who present co peteni substantial evidences ai o Conunittee meeting on December 08, 2005 , y the applicant or property owners within Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Ordemr o, the Development Review g an appeal fee, with the Thank you for yow interest in the City of Clcarwater's development review Planning Department through the City's u-ebsite: www.myclearwater.eom, process. You may access our Sincer~/e~'ly~yo~urs, j. sC~l~Urfeman~ `~~---~ - ---.-.-._. - - - .. .~_ TY OF CLEARVI'ATER mltnc DErgxmten-r 0FT~7CE Box 4798 ` .ARWATER, FLORIDA `.3S7J8-4745 ~~~ M P 4 ~~~~ •a+m - ~ s ~ a d®~~ JkOr 2x0 5 ~ omsm ~ 0 .~ 9 ? ~ . n -- u Y - _s p PDVETSa ~ '~ ]•1171 tt.S. PO TAGE ~ MC CLEARY JA;vIES K 3~0 , bV11\~D~t'ARD PSE ~~ ~1~./~ ~LE '1" AR~VATER FL 33767 - 2242 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ly ~© ~ VENDER6 0FSNEWIADDRE5511/a6/OS MCCLERR ~ ~~ b661 1-:0R5ESFi0E CtiANFiA55EN MN CURV 55317-9526 ~ I~I.f~~f,I...II....I II...Il~I~~~I~I~„l~l~lf~„Il,,.~,llil,~,l Dew 05 05 1 1 : 29a J i m~cC l eary 95243390 p . 1 . ~~sl ~ 11/03/2©05 25:27 ~275E2:457b -- } ~'~~~ `3 1 G0 SOU. 1``avertlber 03, 2005 ~'1 ^r C~~ ~~~EnF',~gT~ PP-~~.aE ~2 ~~ ~~~A~ Vd A 1 ~~ ~~->`;I~+iiti'G ~C~AR~`~VII~NT 1V.fLTPv'IC~AL SERVICEa BUII,DING Ivl~'RTLE t4.VE.iVTi;lr, CLEr~WAT1:~R, FLGRID~, 33750 Ep~QNE: f727) 5fi2-4567 FI~,X: f727) 562-4576 W'~VVI%.lt'[YCLEAR~+'A7ER.C0?~'[ Kenneth P Reiss I 1 San Marca 5t Agt 308 Clearwater, l^'1 337G7 RE: FLS200S-10080 -- l<07LEEti~t:~RU I51, l -- Laker of Isxcompleteness Dear Ken~ctit P Reiss The Planning Staf~ lass entered yaur application. ir..to the Department's fa.lit9g systean and assigned the case aatttnber.: FL520t75-10080. Aftcx a prelitrinary rcvi.ew o2 #l;e submiKed docurttents. staff has d.etertninod that *.hc app?.icativa7 ig co>m l,,,gtog with the follawing c6rrunents. ~t•. Please ackno~~led~e SectAQa~ E a-egardin,~ storm~~'atex requi.renaents. . Please provide a signed. and sealeal suxvey per sc:,tio*~ F. -~. case provide a txce sun~ey get Section F. Please p.rovidc a Site Bsta Table get Seeti.can C3. lncl.~.dc hand axes ins aaara .feet sand cl.etailed ~ lSR c~tlculatirnas. 6 ' G S ~b ~, ~'l.easa: ackno4vled~e Traffic Imgact Studyper StietioTf lC. Provide existing grade el~yatxons ev;,zy 18 inches in ttaa tear of. the pr®poscd ~tructuxe. Z Section, ~+-202 ol'tlse Cammauaity Ucvelapment Code stags that if an. application is deemed inca~tsp;ete, the de~ciezacies of the application .hall be sgeeified tsy Staff. ~o fuar-tlact dpvelt~prnen.t. review action sh.ail be taken until the def ciPn~io~ are co~cted aaxd tihe a~:splieation is deemed oompiete. Please resubmit by Thursday 1~6~'eTttl7er t_0, 2005 ~~'`vooza. J.i= you lyaue any questions, please do oast hesitate to ecmtect me at 562-~5fi7x2504 car Scott . Ku. l stn an@myc l earw ales: - ee m.. Sincerely yours, l~ j%~~fj/~~ - Scott Ikurlesnan Planner ti L.e~rer of InccmplRteneu • TI.SZOG3•IlJOdtl - T 0' f J'rWr4Rn (~L l 1 E ~ - § 3-903 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ~l~l ~,i~ %~- Q ~e,,~S) 2. No air conditioning equipment, pool equip- exceeding 36 inches, in the 45 angle formed by ten went or similar mechanical equipment feet back from the property line on the water and shall be permitted within a reduced side along the side property line. setback which has been approved as a Level One flexible standard development or as a Level TWO flexible development. NO STRUCTURE OR LANDSCAPING MAY BE (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00) INSTALLED, OTHERTHAN NON-0PAQUE FENCE NOT EXCEEDING 36" IN HEIGHT WATER Section 3-904. Sight visibility triangle. ~ - r - - - - ~ - - - ~ - ~ - - - ~ - - - - - ~~ o ~ ~ ~.~ ~ - `' ~ ~J A. To minimize traffic hazards at street or ! driveway intersections, no structure or landscap- ing may be installed which will obstruct views at STRUCTUiE a level between 30 inches above grade and eight ~ ;;i~, feet above grade within the sight distance trian- gle described in the following figure. ~ ,.., ~.. •~_ ~~' _' _ _ _ _ _ _ SIGHT TRUN6LE 45 DEGREE TRIANGLE RIGHTS-OF-WAYaedDRIVBWAYS enhanced views restrictions (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6928-02, § 48, 5-2-02) ~ ICY n,K Section 3-905. Coastal construction control line. A. Purpose. This section establishes within the city the coastal construction control line as the line of reference from which setbacks shall be measured along the Gulf of Mexico for buildings and structures pursuant to F.S. § 161.053 in order to protect the safety, economic, environmental, recreational and community appearance objec- tives of the city. Exhibit A -Sight Visibility Triangle Sight Visibility Triangle B. Required setback. No building or structure shall be located seaward of the coastal construc- tion control line unless approved by the State of Florida. C. Interpretation. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to conflict with or B. To enhance views of the water from residen- supersede the authority of the state in regard to tial waterfront property, no structure or landscap- establishing the location or relocation of the coastal ing may be installed, other than a fence around a construction control line, or any waiver or vari- swimming pool or any non-opaque fences not ance to the requirements relative thereto pursu- Supp. No. s - CD3:30 <, stt~ Dec. 06 2005 11:45AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USRGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98497834 Dec. 06 11:44AM 01'01 SND 01 OK TO TURK! OFF REPORT, PRESS ' h~JU' ##04. THEhI SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADUANTAC~ ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX 0435-7-329). a Clearwater I 1 ~~ Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: _ SURROUNDING USES OF AD,;ACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: ___ SOUTH: ___ WEST: EAST: J SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ~~ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans J SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ /,,!(J ~ NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-2~`L.A) ,;PPLICANT NAME: ~`e /~ ~ ~~ ~ "P~/'SS ~ FAAILINGADDRESS: // ~-/Gl /7 i~,~~GG~~ D ~~~0~ ~ O~Z 3 FAX NUMBER:_ ?riONE NUMBER: ~~~ ~( f __ ?ROPERTY OWNER(S): ~~ ~ ~ `P ~ ~`-~ <` (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) ' +GENT NAME: !aAl! tNG ADDRESS: _ ______ ;~~ONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: i I CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (C.,de Section 4-202/A) i STREET ADDRESS of subject site:~d~ ~'~`~-,!/~~~./- ~ ESL. ~ ~ - i _~GAL DESCRIPTION: _____ ___ (if not listed here, please note the llocation of this docume-nit in the~sujbmittal) ?..=;RCEL NUMBER: D ~ ,yZ ~ ! S ~ ~? ~ (~ O U ~ U ~ `- ~-> i r i ~.ARCEL SIZE: ~~ ~ ~ U JQ j (acres, square feet) I I ?ROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): l Si ~~JC_.~- YLiT~i ~ C~ ~-~S ~ L~~i/C- -f_- (number of dwelling units, Icetel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) I GSCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): ~Q~,S/,G!/~~,~`-0 /~e~li~ qL-OU~/~ ~c!//L!//,per// /~ ~ % 6a :oath sneers and be specific when identifying the request (includ~ requESted code deviations; e.g. r~iclion in required number of parking space ec~iic use. =!~ I Page 1 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (T~A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (t3) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. "' - ~n~~z~(/~Ta~ ~ ~.~u/ S. fJP ~~ is sa7i ~u .~ ~ ~ ~ Gli ~` T~ !Z ~ S~ (~ /1a vii ~ yon C G(i i G ~ 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ~ 3. The proposed development will of adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ,~ /~ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community chara~cte~r of the immediate vi~clinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ~ ~ ~~ ^ - ,~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~_ r~ ^ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: Page 2 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater • E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance w the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exempti to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recordirig a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ All dimensions; _ North arrow; En -ineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; , cation map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; _ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All. existing and proposed points of access; . _ All required sight triangles; Identification of envirorimentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 3 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of a!I outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ^ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _ Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ^ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/: X 11) and color rendering if possible; ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _ Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; _ Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; _ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; _ Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions,.soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; _ Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; _ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11) (color rendering if possible); ^ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 4 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater • FROM :STYLISTIC DESIGN CUSTOr~'lE FAX N0. :727 849 7834 •Sep. 13 2005 03:05AM P3 .. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: all p or perty owners on deed -please Pf21NT full names) t, That (I amlwa are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): d ~ c.t~ .~ L~.- 2, rnat this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe reques!) -r _o ~ s'Ty ~.7- ~- ,boa C_ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~a U •~ c~ s~' ~- ~ ~%.~ 3- That the undersigned (has have) appointed and (does/do) appoint_ as (h;s/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions Or other dacumentS necessary to affect such petition; a- That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Claanaater. Florida to ronslder and act on the above described property; 5- That site visits to the property are necessary by Ciry representatives In order to process this appllcatien and the Owner authorizes Clty representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is tru® and correct. ~ l Property owner Property Owner S'~'ATF OF FLORIDA, COUNTY nF °~-' ~{~.LLSf~C~r G~• Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the la of the State of Florida, on thi ~~~ personally appeared 1~~ _ ~ who haul en first duly s~ Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents 9f-t affidavit the e/she sE 9/ ~ a-+' ~ llnda A Brtto / ~~ ~ v / • ~ My Comrniasi DDt33570 Notary Public MY Commisslon Expires: ~ip~'f ~y~August2 $;~Planning OsparfinentlApplicstion FormsltlevelOpment reviet~/IBXit)!e standard development applicstlon 20p5.doc Page 8 of 6 - Fiexlble Standard Development Applicatlon 2005- City of Clearwater FROM :STYLISTIC DESIGN CUSTOf~ME FAX N0. :727 849 7834 i Sep. 13 2005 83: 04AM P2 I, BUILDING j~LEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required In the event the application InGudes a development where design standards are in Issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown bistrlcts) or as pelt of a Comprehensive Infi{I Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infikl Project. D BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; G REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 i4 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) -~ J R All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs an dimensions (area, height, etc_), indicate whether th®y wilt be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details inGudlrtg location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). p Reduced signage proposal (8 %z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application- K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.0) O . Include if required by the TraftlC Operations Manager or his/her designe0 Or If the pro development', Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the mprehensive Plan. • WIII generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersecvon with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual lkst of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition Of the Institute of Transportation Engineei s (17E) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting' held ~nfith the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Departm.ent'6 Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562.750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study IS Included. The study must include a summary table of pna-and post~evelopment levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement ai all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND. SlGNIFlCANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that alt representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property deathbed in this appll tlon. Signature of property owner or representative ~~ u..C~:~2pu 4 ~-r STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF-PN~1~l~- Svv~~{{p~prn ~to anQ ~SUbSCribed before me this ~-~ day of Jt~T`~ 1~0 A.D. 20_ to me a or by who is personally own has oroduoed _ e~ ~--~.._.__ as Lind~A Brito Otary pU IIC, f MY Commission My commission expires: '~ ,,~e ~~~„~ eini~, Page 5 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 200rr City of Clearwater ~ ~ N{CH.pLAS.~, OK~SON,::p;p; 13787 BEICHER ROAD, SUITE 100 LARGO, FL 337.71 (~2Y) 535.9899 OEA N ' QO 5089025 '(727) 5819474 SUN COAST HOSPITAL L1C. N -OS 0007320 BATCH Y MDIOl1022FPSOD7142 ~- - ~~ NAME ~ Jr A,G~E ADDRESS DATE`.:? Rx 14LE(iAl IF NOT SAFETY: BWE BACKGROUND ' H&htSTS'EBASURES AND gLTERATIONS 'ILLEGAL APPEARSIF COPIED . Y r~~ l.f fit, ~ ~ f~'rt~~ ~/nt:~~' vvar'. /(. i l c~->r~S G~~~~ ~~ ^ ~ ~~ ~?~ ,~ ~~. r ~~ . Label Refill times ~ ` (Si~riature) In order for the brand name product,to be'dispensed, the prescriber must write 'Medically Necessary' bn the front of this prescription. t~ 49FP5097142 SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE .15 EAST BEARING BASIS ESTABLISHED FROM: THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 22 0 10' LCl SCALI; ) = IO.O -18"CONC. CURB lOT 23 I `.~ RESIDENCE ll i FINISHED FSOOR ELEV. 5.92' /- FENCE N 88° 30' 37" E (C) / 126.70' 3 ,t 9q, I N 83° 26' 23" E „- ° ----(~R~-III---- ~ 120.00' F~ ~' `, S I F(FL i N 88° 30' Oi" E `° 1 _ ~M) ~ `12?•08' >< FL_-~ _ _ __- Bla. .o ~ fn a,-fe~~~~~r e• OPEN PIPE ,; ~ ~ mx ~~ n .. ~ _ _ ----- ---- D,------ ' r~' ' it.t~! 14.1'! N BLDG - - --~ l DPCK ~ f.~" J rRON~, f. C ~~COK.. DRIVE '. -p/y,loPOr Mve45,~ Di ~ ~n ~ ' F.9 / / ''' 0 ~ / / 's ~ LOT.22 o ~ 5p i ~ G. F / SE E / 4 r ~ ~ ~PAVFReo ~" F r ~ DRIV[1 ; ~~j / 9 <,.,A,,,,. t D ' iV ~ ~ u.D' ~I O~ V I L cevn wv, ~ a 25'-0". G' I rosT ~ ~ F oNr sETBA b l o ~ ¢, l . ~ a -- ~ b ~ ~ ~ f. C. ~„¢. DRIVC ArxpN y . POWER POLE ~z. ~.,..- S 88 '38' S9" E ---- c F~ s 88° 38' S9" W (M) BENCH MARK I FL P.K. NAIL IN ~ Z POWER POLE I , ? o ELEV. = 5.15 I o (NAND) I ' ~D ~, __ v ~ w LOT 20 RESiD I ; ~ ~,, FINISHEC I ~ w ELEV. rn j m p ABBREVIATIONS ~ [ CO +CxOFO MS[MYE ' 3 NF N[ COx0lilOVin . RCC•RFRFIC C.E-CDVeI.4D [xlFr flEV .CLLVA ~ nlUn=AIIGIIAVx "a °,e~l~ . lION CO C. CO'Kxnf flY.= FAiI[FlY clsucoxcnn[sun frxi..: fxmsuF[ (Ox.-ILm.FF fOF.•F DLEMfnWlFnr ' iO ~ ' v 4 ' ~.-. &K•®00[ elw °DOUfvam . Fw.. COrtND Fs„i, Fns[I¢nr P.R.M. ~!v . DroY.•DmmDnxr G°~~,~ c'''Cp1Rf 110°i01X'0 Dx,. pirvF N.. nEM1.F0 4"ROUND ' rtNlm 4°a" ce.-olDxD mn¢nw oan.~pulxACF Fnrvrwn nxu K.o.i-I;on[an RSS o.F D.vr. nnnx:MS Flulr.a.n.r rl.. xoxni E.fnsr mr. rroxrxlur CO NC. MONUME WITH NAZI NT ~...___ ____ ..__..___ .-____._... .._.__.__._ ~ ' JL-OVFAtIFM)NIJIYRM R. DnwunfeDFD DnoK I":rvA,xDDK .,FD~xrDFR~xrcANFf "P.-FfFnxmnf (OxlFfn IOlxi mltxSCCIlOU C., R4RM u.. vmm asemnme ac. FDUrt o[Frnu[cuxv[ xI FI~IFCAYC nOn' xA0•PlOIUS •v:fSl Ffvaclxe sv[neFfr ~:FAxG[ :,rxr~ss "nY.xl°~,DI.,.,Ar rmFf r.F,x,x~.,.~„,,, 5.~ $DD(11 . DCGI¢!S yC'x.5(xeVHU rixNRS,nRp USfD in WNUKGf SFC=SCnION "•SEL91MM¢n u5fOm0fMIKGS r.snln¢nY -RnmRx uvom DlsueRfs vu~-rFUSruxxrx •varcs,xrtnuuomolslAKes Untxl UlnrSxiv snlD rK1xU~iwlxKnx rftnCN UA m ITE I (C.nL~~ 1' = DESCRIPTION: THE NORTH 12 FEET OF LOT 20 A'ND ALL OF LOT 22, "UNIT 1 ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 44, PAGES 61 THRU 63, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. - coNC. SEA WALL IN~I TF, R VVA Y .r, ' ~ -', DOCK =` ~ `- - - ~J ~` 'v. b 0• ~ 1 1 ~' f _ 1 -' OPEN BOAT ~c.f,„¢IX SLIP ~\ ""` °" COVERED F / ,~'' ~(U 1 V~ / WALK LINE DATA: LINE 1: 6 h~~ S. 00° 27' 30" E. (C) 12.00' / ~ ~ ~' a , 0 1' S ~ 00° Ol' 12" E. (M) 1 1.92' FErx~' ~ `~l 60' :~• SJ `Q1 CURVE DATA: (IvveR `°°` °"x'~ ~' p3 ~ CURVE 1: •' ~-~~"'"' ° 5p 0~° RAD. = 6070.00' " • \5h~'i h~ ARC. = 97.00' 5 C.D. = 97.00' (C) 97.10' (M) ..__._. _ _ _. Y..___ _ ~ - arrvMe O __________________ _____ __ _ in~m ~ ' ` o ~.a, f LEGEND C.B: = N. 00° 26' 49" W. (M) JI, ~, w~ W ~ ~ -BASIS OF BEARINGS ~-' J ^ r I;ncarcnn[xrnmxfm ---J~ /~ 109.96' -~-- sy, . SEr VY ~Fpi FODIRxmN ('II~I'~Tj~ FENCE ~F~~oa ~SETx4fDDI~xIM CURVE 2: B.r-- o r°,KDxx, RAD. = 150.00' J- .~_-_. _ .ro ~ '°~ °~°°°nD^°1tlhRm ARC. = 65.00' NCE C. D: = 64.49' (R) 64.37' (M) 6FLBOZOR THE NORTH 12'- C.B. = S. 30° 39' 05" E. (R) oFLOrzo C.B. = S. 30° 24' S4" E. (M) NOTE: THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "AE" WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION,OF 11.0' ACCORDING TO MAP iNTArDWARD PA,SSACG' NUMBER 12103C0102G, DATED SEPT. 3, 2003. NOTE: ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAND 1988. 'LAN >Glf fin,~w,k,,..,~,ou,frfF.,x.M,manxDF,x~¢Fl~n~[RRf~xANn x :. ~y,~.~.,~m..,.r:.xxx~n,l..~m~„I,.,.~~.•,.,~,..n~x.x~l~.,~„ _ rrJil:IbA,r mimw<va4E Ne pgnry Gev,:plm,mnm M.m na. pardrlMRr,< n, Mcn IU'-U' n0 Umn~µbµW ~, o• ryox.n ixxxntN rw+.lnnx, nn<mlinmb:;nro ,glC:ln'tucfMiw.w ~qwM rAAdl UelwnR dawh,~rli.M niryl:p,Jr;ny x~ rxr : In,lem nn~ewx"nw:mmm: ram x,~xxx.~FAx xxn,rm..x fxx.,Wxv .ax..apa,:xrA ml mK. x~xxr.rt nKFxl xm+grmen xDeny. ml xryry Jm u: nln.mmlxo.nv ' nxl/vi.~x.cui lAW xR M", Ilclwmnl J~.pnin~~.x on. FOCJiy u. Jemay „ dMHr~.'.~ •uuIN lM ~i n.»p~~.m:i Uin:IMP.n:n~dro~u.rxf.I1PU 1'rx ~x.ly 9nn!I.~olxh'~IK~.1+}x to in,ni.~,. x.pAx~.., iri.~x•:i;.:, "x'll wi:k mm uN^r~,x.xi.,~!xrr.I.tJ.~n~.llvl.,r...x..rrnl.~, I - f t ~.Ir ~~.u,Rn Nlrw. x " „,Alvr u~rumr axw u'('~rv.rU.I.rpU*..J4e,.d x r ~~., rr - ny,ervlln Frxn:uAVxV. v..... Jaye :M ~nutsl a"..MK"mins,pmw~xm ~ . CJ C"J N .--i ~? D l~J ~r~ 1-~ C~ d rn ~~ r~ ~T f`- N r x r; u~ J W _a _L 4'ROT17 ~L~YATI4N ~'`~ 10 `- 0 `; ~G }iUSS~Rt L~f.'31C,tJ GPOOUq°, x005 z ~~ L ttREw rnrtfaN swc ns TlP R..pnus # alters oc s%ae wa st Rm. ntuwb @ n^ 4. PATTERNS (fEf TTP. vNLL SECTNWS RNEEi X01 rb). _ TI1! RRM T'ER PoR.<T MRPreO ovcR Hv Wr~w Z•S METAL RefifRf f4nvtw Pu CPNt.Ni bY.RD fiw!TAC ptpTlRf w/3'/c vE.RE Der S+n'DADEpa L6 METAL RID4l3 lr 2x1 METAL JD1sT 4nlV.tCR3w$ DvfR IIL'CtNtnT PrNRD YRRWEV TO MP1nL RAplfRS w/ IV3° ft Lf~TApv4 IntTAL sTYD SCREws ^~ DECR-. rwRTER EDGE vvvfR c xRewEDro I I RAFTER- -_ N3 -- i.c ^~ w1f~p^ke cwi Cfr^OnlnTlous R0. L1 ~ T BncFUD c YO 9. XR ~ o ,Ip ].e nETAL sTYpf tt fGNTC./ f ww ovE4 4'plvrvD fff 1•p ~ wrRt MtaN ov 4 PNR f e•.rc' %Nx%-wr 9_CCK e LtiP S1V0510 R X1Y ` c . s a 15OP I ) fuC+V wtiL fPCirowt _ n/ 1<s iEdaR CQ\T -- PAiItRN {nrnP A'S TYp. pv~Lt 5`C-/~OV 3, ' P 'xr L. DVPR 1/2'CPnrtNT By.RO / xRC-wPp IF OVER ]]'DOWEL STEPS"oP* - ~ W M.E L fTR35 C µ TO nRTAL fTVOS. Rwr P2 +'A'OO.IVERT.) a .__ ~ /m au? •. nfMRne'N. ADD a ~ ~ ~ 6 KIN) I....... ..rw roc,ws- I ~ I r ~ ~~r F.wv INiFAMEONTE d D B'%9'Xte'KNOOKdpi >o - uv fR ^ BIOGK WI 1 Re REBAR ~ , CONT. 1-- .:a~.~... xE Rf?it CGV+ ( V) .~i uen.v<E ~ +vA i ~ D a3 +.TRE [ rR v ~ R b'-7' OC. iTP. w.. i. r.a ~ N1 c ~ . _._ ~t Y_ <. YVf~ b~i~~~ CWINflNEV SE~YIOCJ^s T.I., 4 D~ REAR ELEVATION 'ih"` I`0~ E DRG ~" NAVD O N/.W DRG IIA.sIp 0 )S 7D F3E 1.o.rrTp i., ~~ ~ ~ S~ ~~ .A Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. ~L~OI~~J ~ J9eay Meeting Date: /Z ~ 0 Location: ~~7 ~~~~~-l~ ~~G~~~~ ~~e~Current Use: S~~ Active Code Enfor rte' Address number r 1,%1'2 ~ ~ ~ S`tYC,cC~Z ~ 6 cement Case (no) yes: ~~'J~.~('1~~~~. yes) no) cant land) ~' Landscaping (yes) ~no) 'Overgrow .(yes) (no) Debris (yes) - o) inoperative vehicle(s) (yes no) 'Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor)( ,,ate' Fencing (none) (good) ilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) S ~~~~rt~~ ~' Paint (good) (fair) (poor)) (g ria sria sh) ~~ ~/Grass Parking (yes) o) .ate Residential Parking Violations (yes) o ,,.a~'Signage (non (ok) (not ok) (billboard) .~ Parkin n/a (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) ~'~ ^ Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) ~OutdOOr storage (yes no) Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): ~~~ ~~~ Crr; ~ ~ C~ri~u.(~rdvr ~a~-rh /~~ G ~- ~ ~~ ,, , ~ Date:~~ ~ 4.~Reviewed by: ~N~ Telephone:~~ °~ `~~a~ Revised 0 -29-01; 02-04-03 m 4 .. . ~~ ~y` +i ~.«i PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 CASE SUMMARY PNU2005-03103 107 LEEWARD ISL Vacant lot overgrown again PEOPLE Role: Owner/Property CONDITIONS 3-1503.8.1. Not Met "'PUBLIC NUISANCE CONDITION*" a condition or use that exists on this property causes a substantial diminution of value of property in the vicinity of this condition or use and is considered a public nuisance. ! ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 KENNETH P REISS PHONE: No Phone 11 SAN MARCO ST APT 308 FAX: No Fax CLEARWATER, FL 33767 3-1503.8.7. Not Met **LOT CLEARING VIOLATION** -Excessive growth or accumulation of weeds, grass, undergrowth or other similar plant material, reaching a height of more than twelve (12") inches, or the accumulation of debris upon property within the City of Clearwater. ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Done Disp By FAIL SDB Inspection 11 /8/2005 11 /9/2005 11 /9/2005 OG areas, especially near street and Porto-let; silt fencing coming down too. Complaint Received Inspection 11 /8/2005 11 /9/2005 11 /28/2005 SDB r:\Forms\I nfoSummary.rpt Z P ~~`~ 9'45 am Case Number: FLS2005-10080 - X07 LEEWARD ISL 1 ~ f;~E `L~'~',~~~ I , . Owner(s): Kenneth P Reiss Q~ ~ ~L L ~~~ /~l~l'iE' 11 San Marco St Apt 308 Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: 727-449-0123, FAX: 849-7834, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 0.26? acres located approximately 98 feet north of Windward Passage and Leeward Island. Atlas Page: 267B Zoning District: IEOD, Island Estates Neighborhood Overlay District Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the rear (east) waterfront setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and to increase the pool height from 12 inches to 36 inches above existing grade per Section 2-1602. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Island Estates Civic Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 140 Island Way TELEPHONE: 442-2237, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Scott Kurleman, Planner II Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: 1. NO ISSUES Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues -construction of single family residence replacing existing single family residence. Stormwater: 1 . Prior to issuance of a building permit the plan is to show lot grading with existing and proposed elevations for side swales including elevations on the adjacent property. This home is to have roof gutters directing runoff away from adjacent property. All elevations are to be based on NAVD 1988 Datum. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, December 8, 2005 -Page 7 1 . Need project value $. • • 2 . Clarify. How is the elevated ppol and reduced rear setback in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties? Reply to each seperately. 3 . Clarify. How will the elevated pool and reduced rear setback not discourage or hinder the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof? 4 . Clarify. How will the elevated pool and reduced rear setback not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood? 5 . Clarify. How is the elevated pool and reduced rear setback designed to minimize traffic congestion? 6 . Clarify. How is the elevated pool and reduced rear setback consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? 7 . Clarify. How does the elevated pool and reduced rear setback minimize adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, olfactory, and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties? Reply to each seperately. 8 . Please respond to criteria 2-1602.1.c. regarding reductions in the rear setback. Other: No Comments Notes: Staff will only support a pool up to 12 inches above existing grade. Island Estates Overlay District (IEOD) specifically pro i spools higher than 12 inches above existing grade. The applicant does have the right to appeal this decision to the CDB. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, December 8, 2005 -Page 8 ~ ~ Dec. 01 2005 04:16PM YOUR LOGO . YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 81 98497834 Dec. 01 04:15PM 01'08 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS ' h'B~l.l' kt04. THBd SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-73291. ~ r LL CITY OF CLEARWATER ° earwater November 16, 2005 > PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUII.,DING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER. COM RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 107 LEEWARD ISL 1 (FLS2005-10080) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 107 LEEWARD ISL 1, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the rear (east) waterfront setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and to increase the pool height from 12 inches to 36 inches above existing grade per Section 2-1602.. On December 08, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be December 08, 2005. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562-4567x2504 orScott.Kurleman@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on December 08, 2005. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ~~~' Scott Kurleman Planner II Letter of Notification - FLS2005-10080 - 107 LEEWARD ISL / ~~ S o2©os- /o~g~ - ~o az~. - MASTOR, ELIA S MASTOR, MATILDE C 361 WINDWARD PSE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2243 UCKLEW, I~ARLE BUCKLEW, DE LANA 409 WINDWARD PSE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2330 POE, FRED C POE, JEAN M 6520 BROOKVILLE RD INDIANAPOLIS IN 46219 - 8219 CHACONAS, LOUIS J 113 LEEWARD ISL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2304 BERLE, RONALD F BERLE, PEGGY A 131 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2304 MOLEPSKE, MARK R 3430 N LAKE SHORE DR CHICAGO IL 60657 - 2872 PAPASTEFANOU, STEVE PAPASTEFANOU, EDITH 258 W SADDLE RIVER RD U SADDLE RIV NJ 07458 - 2120 ANDERSON, PAMELA A ANDERSON, IAN 421 WINDWARD PSG CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2334 Island Estates Civic Assoc. Frank Dame 140 Island Way #239 Clearwater, F133767 READ, SANDRA BAL, KAWALDEEP 410 WINDWARD PSE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2329 NICHOLSON, JAMES L 119 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2304 BUDIN, RICHARD J 201 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2306 DI DOMIZIO, GIOVANNI P 124 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2303 ROWLAND, CARMEN I ROWLAND, MICHELLE M 100 LEEWARD ISL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2303 GONSALVES, JERRY J 420 WINDWARD PSG CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2300 FLS2005-10080 107 Leeward Island SK S~ '~riASLEY, STEVEN M HASLEY, TERRY M 411 WINDWARD PSG CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2330 REISS, KENNETH P 11 SAN MARCO ST APT 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 VALSAMIDES, GEORGE VALSAMIDES, GEORGIA 4879 WEST BREEZE CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 1122 ANDERSON, VERA G ANDERSON, ELIZABETH L 200 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2305 WEISS, ARTHUR I WEISS, DIANNE M 118 LEEWARD ISL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2303 MC CLEARY, JAMES K 350 WINDWARD PSE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2242 Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Doug Williams PO Box 8204 Clearwater, F133758 ~~ ° fig' . ~.~ ~~~ LL CITY OF CLEARWATER ° earwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT --~ ~ ~- ~ ~ -MLJNICII'AL SERVICES BUILDING ~ _100~~SQUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 ~ .~ u L`~TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 ~ ~_ ~~,f~, (- ~ WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM ' ! h0V 2 y 2005 November 16, 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMEt. RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF A~AICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 107 L'~E~~VA'~~~1~S2005-10080) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 107 LEEWARD ISL 1, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the rear (east) waterfront setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and to increase the pool height from 12 inches to 36 inches above existing grade per Section 2-1602.. On December 08, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be December 08, 2005. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562-4567x2504 orScott.Kurleman@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on December 08, 2005. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ~~~g 420 Windward Passage ~~ - Clearwater, FL 33~~~ Scott Kurleman Planner II ~. Letter of Notification - FLS2005-10080 -~07 LEEW, § 2-1602 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Table 2-1602(D). "LMDR/IENCOD" Minimum Develo ment Max. Min. Min. Lot Min. Lot Height Off-Street Use Are¢ (s . .) Width (.) Min. Setb¢cks (.) (.) (1) Parkin Front Side Re¢r (2) Accessory pools and 5 10 screen enclosures Communityftesiden- 7,500 50 25 7.5 15 30 2/unit tial Homes (up to 6 residents) Detached Dwellings 7,500 50 25 ?.5 15 30 2/unit (1) In special flood hazard areas designated by the National Flood Insurance Program, maximum height is measured above base flood elevation. (2) Any pool exceeding one foot in height above grade shall comply with the required rear setback for the principal structure. Waterfront detached dwellings in the LMDR/IENCOD District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3, Division 8, Section 3-805 and Division 9, Section 3-904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the pazcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. E. Flexible standard development for areas zoned LMDR /IENCOD. The following Level One uses are permitted in the LMDRIIENCOD District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this section and other applicable regulations in Article 3. Table 2-1602(E). "LMDR/IENCOD" Flexible Stand¢rd Develo ment Min. Lot Min. Lot Max. Min. Area Width Height Off-Street Use (s .) (.) Min. Setbacks (.) (.) (1) Parkin Front Side Rear (2) Detached Dwellin s 7,500 50 15-25 7.5 5-15 30 2/unit Residential Infill n/a n/a 15-25 3-7.5 5-15 30 2/unit Project (3) Utility/Infrastruc- n/a n/a 25 10 15 n/a n/a tore Facilities (4) (1) In special flood hazard areas designated by the National Flood Insurance Program, maximum height is measured above base flood elevation. (2) Any pool exceeding one foot in height above grade shall comply with the required reaz setback for the principal structure. Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR/fENCOD District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3, Division 8, Section 3-805 and Division 9, Section 3-904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. (3) The development standazds for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based on the criteria specified in Section 2-1602.E.2. (4) Utilitylmfrastructure uses shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to transportation/utility which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. Flexibility criteria: Detached dwellings. a. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for develop- ment is consistent with the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan. b. Front setback: i) A determination of the front setback shall consider the ex- tent to which existing struc- tures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform setback from the right-of--way; ii) The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adja- cent property values; Supp. No. 12 CD2:124 • ZONING DISTRICTS iii) The reduction in front setback is consistent with neighbor- hood character; iv) The reduction in front setback results in an efficient house lay- out. c. Rear setback: i) The reduction in rear setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be pre- served;or ii) The reduction in rear setback will allow the development or redevelopment of a substan- dard lot which would otherwise not be feasible; or iii) The reduction in rear setback results in an efficient house lay- out; and iv) The structures located within the rear setback otherwise re- quired in the LMDR/IENCOD District are buffered with land- scape material or fences to pro- tect the privacy and value of adjacent properties. 2. Residential infill. a. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for develop- ment is consistent with the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan; b. Single-family detached dwellings and community residential homes with six or fewer residents are the only permitted uses eligible for residen- tial infill project application; c. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for develop- ment is otherwise impractical with- out deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other devel- opment standards; d. The development of a parcel pro- posed for development as a residen- 3 § z-iso2 tial infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abut- ting properties; e. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; f. The development of the parcel pro- posed for development as a residen- tial infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel pro- posed for development; g. The design of the proposed residen- tial infill project creates a form and function which enhances the commu- nity character of the immediate vi- cinity of the parcel proposed for de- velopment and the City of Clearwater as a whole; and h. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access or other develop- ment standards is justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Utility/infrastructure facilities. a. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for develop- ment is consistent with the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan; b. The siting and screening of the pro- posed utility/infrastructure facility protects the established character of the Island Estates neighborhood; c. No above ground structures are lo- cated adjacent to a street right-of- way; and d. Any above ground structure other than permitted telecommunications towers and utility distribution lines located on or along a rear lot line shall be screened from view by a landscaped opaque wall or fence which is at least two-thirds the height of the above ground structure and shall be landscaped with trees and Supp. No. 12 CD2:125 ~ « § 3-903 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 2. No air conditioning equipment, pool equip- ment or similar mechanical equipment shall be permitted within a reduced side setback which has been approved as a Level One flexible standard development or as a Level Two flexible development. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00) Section 3-904. Sight visibility triangle. A. To minimize traffic hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structure or landscap- ing may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within the sight distance trian- gle described in the following figure. ~~ ,~~ Exhibit- A -Sight Visibility Triangle Sight Visibility Triangle exceeding 36 inches, in the 45 angle formed by ten feet back from the property line on the water and along the side property line. NO STRUCTURE OR LANDSCAPING MAYBE INSTALLED, OTHERTHAN NON-0PAQUE FENCE NOT EXCEEDING 36" IN HEIGHT :. 5r~ucruRE ~o' ~; - ~_ 45 DEGREE TRIANGLE ~1 i j'~~'~ ic„~i enhanced views restrictions (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6928-02, § 48, 5-2-02) Section 3-905. Coastal construction control line. A. Purpose. This section establishes within the city the coastal construction control line as the line of reference from which setbacks shall be measured along the Gulf of Mexico for buildings and structures pursuant to F.S. § 161.053 in order to protect the safety, economic, environmental, recreational and community appearance objec- tives of the city. B. Required setback. No building or structure shall be located seaward of the coastal construc- tion control line unless approved by the State of Florida. C. Interpretation. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to conflict with or B. To enhance views of the water from residen- supersede the authority of the state in regard to tial waterfront property, no structure or landscap- establishing the location or relocation of the coastal ing may be installed, other than a fence around a construction control line, or any waiver or vari- swimming pool or any non-opaque fences not ance to the requirements relative thereto pursu- Supp. No. 6 CD3:30 SIGIiT TRUNOLI? RIGHTS-OF-WAY nrd DRNL'WAYS ~' § 3-804 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 2. In the HDR, MHP, C, T, D, O, I, IRT, 1. On property adjoining water: OSR, and P zoning districts, brick or other masonry walls or walls with masonry columns linked by substan- sE^w^LL tial grill work shall be permitted to a ~, w~~x maximum height of six feet in a ~ • - • - • - - - • - • - - - - - - - required front setback. i t 3. Landscaping requirements. Any fence ~ or wall that exceeds three feet in stv~cTV~ height and is located within any - required structural setback adjacent ! to a public right-of--way shall provide ! a three feet wide landscaped strip on ~ - - - - - - • - - - • - - - • - - the street side of the fence. SE NON-0PAQUE FENCE PERAARTED B. Side and rear setback areas. Fences and walls shall be permitted to a maximum setback diagram height of six feet between the principal 2. Where a swimming pool exists ad- structure and any side or rear lot line. joining water: Such fences may be permitted up to eight feet in height, however, if located in the Industrial, Research, and Technology Dis- w~~R trict ("IR.T"). C. Waterfront property. Except as provided in ! subsection 1 or 2, no fence or wall is ! permitted within the required setback ad- ! slxucruRE joining water: ! REQUIRED I ~ SETBAL>; ~ wA?FR Q' NDNIIPAQUE FEN E Pl~fTTED I ~H ~ ~ ~ setback diagram ! sTxucruRE ! D. Corner lots. For the purposes of fence placement on corner lots, the front yard ~ ! shall be the side of the property from ~ ~ which the property is addressed. The place- ] ~ ment of any fence on this side of the - ' - ' - ' - ' - ' - • - " T ' - ' - • property shall adhere to the front setback NO FENCE OR provisions in Section 3-804(A) above: The wntl PERA~If1TE0 - other side of the property shall be consid- ered aside yard. A fence may be erected in setback diagram compliance with the side yard setback Supp. No. 6 CD3:26 ----_ _ _ . - - ._ ..__ _... . _._.._..-.-..~., x._ _,._~-, -- ----~----,-~ .r.~ ~--1 420 VVirldWard PeS8age .,.. ~~ ,--;~1~.~a,. ' ~`b~-x':~ ~ -~ ,~ ~`~ ~'i ~, Clearwa#er, FL 33767 ~" r ~~ t~Qiv` I ~~ 1 ~ ~ /~vani C; TJ~ /v~~C~ Ui ~pk'~ /` i~ ~~G/~'~'~: `Qa/~'~.:r.z...~•~11~~171F,~f/Illf~~~~~l~l'~ 1' 1 ~~ ; ,. .~- ~ ~. . ~ .. ~ .. f