Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLS2005-11089
FLS2005-11089 211 EWING AVE IEWING STREET TOWNHOMES PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS ATLAS # 287A ZONING: D LAND USE: CBD RECEIVED: 11/02/2005 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLW CoverSheet ~ ~ Planning Depa nt ~~~~~' . ~~~ 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 - Telephone: 727-562-4567 - Fax: 727-562865 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ~ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ~~sS' ~ NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ~ ~ ~ ~ I~j ~~ ~ FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 12/30/2004) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT -- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section M202.A) APPLICANT NAME: /Z~9~/y1cn~'!~ /~/OL-i~iil . ~bc9-/AOFi1 DI~V~C.[~/nE/~i 2-4~ --r MAILING ADDRESS: 7.PEf0 W~ S'~RAV Of2iV~'. ~27~ F~'21L'i4i/2 /3~UFCS. GL `33'7'7 PHONE NUMBER: C7Z7~S~1 " ~159ly FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): CASE #: FL` ~--' DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: 1, ~'~{( `~,1~ I ..f .._....,. (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) ~ _ _ ~' " "'~ f AGENT NAME: F3~/AN 6,relLfc~~., 13fJL~~fft~ +~ AS.SG"Cii/7~5 ~ ~~~~ P~t~'~r '~..~...~ . ,~,~ ,„.f MAILING ADDRESS: lcy~Z bff • L/I~%E~(~6j/~f/~U~.SIJIT~ ~ TAiYIPR~ FAG- 33770 , __ , ,T • VI I Y Wit' ~a>M ~,h"_~,+(,•n- PHONE NUMBER: ~~/~) BS~"4/S/.~ FAX NUMBER:- 0135{~Z~~ CELL NUMBER: ~g f 3 ,5.7~57°<<JZ~f E-MAIL ADDRESS: ~~/` ~KeS~~ic~eatcfii?C:-~~'1 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: ~/ f ~J~t.lGi ~~N'fiE~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~QC1/r77.Qn91~~16it,/T,$' REV BL/C B C-DTS % l~ l2/~ 2~r 27, Z~ (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: /$-~~g' ~~~~/~~ fts©2 f ~/iCt~ CiZa~~i~~ E92~~oZ7Of®280 PARCEL SIZE: t' X33 ~- , ys~~ Sim (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): `Z~ U1..`iT Tcx,dNH~.`-aE Cc~mrr%f~NrTy (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): ~~Xl$EF,~T!}iEIO~QIQOS ~1ftLO/'i77~1U'jAi~i2oL~l~L.ka2/% ~'CY~IiT T~r~.W/~~1FloA7AlL3t!/7'(~ Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) 7'L' C~rr~P~y /w!iTil/,Q~l~'NCABL.C~~D~S~1N'©~'.S/6~/Frr~ACL/~c/~,5, Page 1 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater '~ R CR16iNAl. DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO ~C('rf yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) -C/ PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) I~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) SEE" ~cu~s~D C.~ Py ~ F DEE~~ apta t D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) B~ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 7//e 6~pPo5'C}~ ~t/~tc~PAt~nl~ /h~3'~ THt~C~~T~c-"12f~4 A•~/p ~iSsoNa~TxfF D~Wi~/T~c~I~J~-~Z~[7P,yp~V1- C ~! ~N Es ~ A~©Q USED /N Tr1~ P,2c</~C P7t/A~P,Q~4°T dE ~~Ga:~~RA~r ~l~-iJD ~J$'rT~F Td((c ~%~n PP.-~~-~T~Cy/e~P~-/1~Ji~ ~s/c C~-+4Ktctsdrt:~ Cr:P~~~ 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ~~ G~~-~>B/itr;~,~i ~€JvvEAJt4T~Sl~1 ~2E/F t~~~wl'zl/' ~/1tPo~0 ~F t~,cJy~~.,~D ~A~!®. ~sf~i°~//~~ ~yEZc~oiitcTlT6c.~le.tee,ICvc~,~4~E~1lF.uJ~~r~P.gr~vlB~/ ~a7Df n~ ~r /)Gt~TS• 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. /~0 S~'Tt/©~ s~1G7'H iSS~S~ ~2~Crw.S~D.gci.4 ~~D~'1'~AL~"~19?~ Trfc dknl~D .S/T~ ~~~E'~RATt~i~t~~4L(CS' Tt~ Ai0 Tlf~'.~/4~7`-/UF~~SiO~fS~. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ~~ ~12c~s~D bEG~~nEx•T co~A~~t/~ ~.y6~i `'l1IJA~ fnl~'E,~iUAL~oAO °TiiAruaNN~CT~ ~U/~1~~4yEiclt~r~/!?~J2A/~y~'T~ ~1fU 7~i4FFfC ~l~J D ~T1i. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. A~TNr?UFnjf r~/~PR~PosEOC~r~z~w,d/~imk~jVGl`/A~Trf! 5'N~~Y~$~iN6 L~fA~'AL~I~. lTf~EITE~ ~GG73 Tl{r ~DA~S~w9r[ r~ti1s' ~Ti/~ ?~tce1N~WNIPi'~CVE~~itCitii ~'~/ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Ti~ lftaU~5aFc5PEi2.9Tiay ,.¢,~J~ AC:cacJ~ ~i c M1Oi4C y :S f~,eFLc-~tl5~S7~T LUf,'/f l47"TAi(~~ jxcf~u-/,tld . ~j t7~'1"i .¢ C ~- ~fc~Ni Tim S ~1ND ~~il/oT c~c~2Au-IC CoiUSiO ~1?~ ~4 ~lce~ ~ll~~i~.lt~x11~/~LoP~FV~~rc.~~iyq~lc~~~yi,SyA~-~~'i~C,~f%©fT~AQEA; Ash ~E~~r`~.~°fiAL Ce~/-'~MV.tJ~Ti~S /~ ~loT ~tar7cltF ~ i~~7LS~l}tXi~S= ~_. ~ ~. , f3~ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning Districf~to which .the waiver is 1, ~ ~ ! ~ _ requested (use separate sheets as necessary) -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: ~ r,~~ ~~-- _ ;, ~ CE E R~f+rQ Cc~S~D o ECG T/ ~~ - _ N~V ~ 2 7~~ w ~ In 1.....-.~ ~ n r~,!q ..,,.. :, ~1~Y ~;r~~- , Page 2 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater v ~ QRiG'iPJAL E. STORMWATER PLAN .SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri, Manual and 4-202.A.21) T6t<.~ic! j~/(~.D~S~iR/C%. ~CEA$~/lE-F~'/L ~ $T~Qs~,S~~//C~brSr2~~i A~'PLicy-Tititl. A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involy addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with th City of Clearwater Storn Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption t this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stortnwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the CitYlnanual. / Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable rd Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a.grading plan and finished floor elevations shall provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND. NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site an • within 25' f the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating gees to be remove se design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; [8~ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ~~j ~ /~PpLfCABi.E !~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); l~ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ~~'7'-fff~i'~Lf Cft$f.-~ G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) `~ '~ ~ /'t - -~ - ~ t ` , 4 SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ~ '' -' t ~ .-- a ,; All dimensions; North arow; Iy~V o ~~~~ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Y 2 Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; ~'^ ••~ _ -. -,~ _ y , !_ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures, ~~;' ~L~~~~ ~ • a;::_. _;-, ``~ 1T Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; C~! T ~~ r j i-r~ ,.~. , . , __ ~ 1 All required setbacks; 4... - ~ „, ,. !"• e' All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 3 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~~~~~IV~ Y Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. d SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R:) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11) and color rendering if possible; FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; percentage of the paved vehicular area; 3.' ~ ~ N(lV c? 2 ~0~5 Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. ~H/. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) I~ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom. elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule-with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. I~ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/~ X 11) (color rendering 'rf possible); ~/ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); /~O~~w~-~~~LE L~f COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, a§ applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. /1iLp'}"f~aC}'l Page 4 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ORIGINAL I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'h X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. f~ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ~ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). /v~iQO.~G%~i~L~ Reduced signage proposal (8'/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ~f~~~oE,j~~ K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) f~ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or ff the proposed development: /J~~Q~i ~C~~ • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations. Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs a1nd each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. .1`r Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. ~ ~. _~ ~ .. .--- ,, t 1~ If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. t~OV 0 2 2Q05 L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and Sw m to aand subscribed before me this ~ day of authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property b ~' A.D. 20~ to me and/or by describe ~ is application. who is personally k~ has produced as ide ' i 'on. ignature roperty owne or representative Notary public, My commission expires: MY COMMISSION #DD256813 EXPIRES: OCT 08, 2007 Page 5 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater ~ CRlGiPdrii_. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: E1~/1~eE~ ,~j~r/EtaP/rtFNT LL-P (Names of all property owners on deed -please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): E`t9q~l~l/YtQ+',J flc~f4ifTS t@EV (-3d-1f 6 ~19`TS ifs 12~ /3y L(o- 2'7~ 2~3 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) ~/~ ll~J 1 T TE~N/Mf1o/11L- GOP-7/rll0lJ i'Ti/ 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: ~~ylh~~O ~d~~ as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property er Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I ~ r ,/ Before me the unde~rsi~gYne~d, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ` I '`Gx1"~~~'a/( day of 1.~Z pers~onall~a~Leared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she u ly of I nderstands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signe /~ .~:"-~ DALE BARNETT _ q (~/- My Commission Expires: ~~ MY COMMISSION #DD256813 Public EXPIRES: OCT O8, 2007 ~_ ~ ~ ~ . ~ .. Y_._. : ~' I S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Fomrsldevelopment reviewlAexible standard development application 2005.doc ~av o 2 2005 P~~~e~~.~~_ .; ~t_.'T Page 6 of 6 -Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater e • • C:RiGI;JpL. CITY OF CLEARWATER PROJECT NARRATIVE Ela Townhomes Clearwater, Florida Prepared for: Ewing Development LLP 2840 West Bay Drive, #279 Belleair Bluffs, Florida 33770 Prepared by: ~,~ __~ ~~ ~;,s 3 & Associates, -Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Environmental Scientists • • Commercial Real Estate • Burcaw & Associates, Inc. 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue -Suite A Tampa, Florida 33625 -~ -. .~ r November 2005 NOtI 0 2 2005 Burcaw Pro'ect No. 05747 Project Description aP~c.rd;a~. The project consists of a 24-unit townhome community on 1.033 acres in the Downtown District, between Ewing Avenue and MLK Avenue just south of Pierce Street. The allowable density on this site is 30 units per acre. . The project is located in the City of Clearwater designated Downtown District, in the Town Lake Residential District. The proposed townhome community is a Level One Permitted Use in this district. The following addresses the Flexible Standard Development criteria for attached dwellings in the Downtown District: Height: The City of Clearwater Community Development Code (Code) allows for a maximum height of 30-50 feet in the Downtown District. The proposed project would have a maximum height of 35 feet. Street Frontage: The townhome community is designed to have an outward appearance to the adjacent Ewing Avenue and MLK Avenue. Driveways and garages would face the internal, private road. However, a sidewalk will connect Ewing Avenue to MLK Avenue to suggest the feel of an urban street environment, with the end units having stoops, doors, and windows facing the City streets. Off-Street Parking: The Code requires a minimum 1 - 1'/~ parking spaces per unit, or 24 - 36 spaces for the development. The proposed project offers two. (2) parking spaces per building, or 48 spaces. Design Guideline Compliance: The following Downtown Redevelopment Plan narrative insures that the Downtown District Design Guidelines are being met. In addition, no metal fabricated buildings are proposed for this site, per Code. Downtown Redevelopment Plan Ela Townhomes will fulfill the Vision of the Downtown Plan by providing the needed residential component to the Downtown area. The townhome units are designed to be aesthetically pleasing from an architectural and landscaping standpoint. The townhome community, with its upscale image, will attract people to live within the Downtown area, promoting more shopping, employment, and recreation to take place there. Variety in housing types will also be satisfied, as few upscale townhome communities currently exist within surrounding area. ' ~ "' '1 - ; _ ~, A~r~V G 2 2005 • •~~~n PJ,~ C. Ela Townhomes promotes a safe environment for the future residents and Downtown as a whole. Access is achieved via a 24' private road which connects Ewing Avenue to MLK Jr Avenue. Driveways are accessed via the internal private road. Sidewalks are also provided in the community, and along the adjacent City streets. The Downtown Redevelopment Plan Visions, Goals, and Policies are accounted for and encouraged by the proposed development. Ela Townhomes will promote new residents, and the safety of those residents, and as outlined below, have been designed to preserve the character and vision of the Town Lake Residential District. Town Lake Residential District Existing Character The proposed land use of this project will keep consistent with the existing residential portions of this district. Ela Townhomes would also make use of the Town Lake storn~water facility, and is within walking distance of the Town Lake Park. The Town Lake Residential District contains significant amount of underutilized land according to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, and this development converts just over an acre of the currently underutilized land into a 24-unit townhome community. District Vision Use.• In keeping with the encouraged residential use, Ela Townhomes will provide 24 townhome units. Function: Ela Townhomes would add new residents in the Town Lake District that will enliven Downtown and provide a market for new retail and restaurant development. The community is also located near the Town Lake Park, for residents enjoyment. Development Patterns: The proposed residential development is south of Cleveland Street. The property is within walking distance of Town Lake, and is architectually styled to face Ewing Avenue and MLK Jr Avenue. Prohibited Uses: The proposed project is not a prohibited use in this area. Gov a 2 2005 F~ f_.i'tS'. a ~., . ai „. ~, . •. ORIGPJAf. Intensity: The proposed density is 23.3 units per acre, which is less than the 30 units per acre allowed per Downtown Guidelines. Height: The proposed maximum height will be 35', or less than half of the allowable 7 5' Town Lake Residential District Policies The Town Lake Residential District Policie Clearwater City Homes project, or the imm ~•-~ ~-: ~pv 0 ~ . Sep 21 U5 U3:U5p J~ COBH, ESQ 7~ 441-3024 p.3 i I' , American Land Title Association Commitment - 1966 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE , I ISSUED BY CRlGf?Jp. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A Texas Corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in' Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policics committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. " This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. Signed under seal for the Company, but this Commitment shall not be valid or binding until it bears an authorized Countersignature. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY STEWART 1y1~ ~l~auman of ;~ Co tersigaed by: Aathori~ze ~gaatory STEWART TITL] Cooipany . \s\ CLEARWATER, FL 33756 city, s~~e MALCOLM S. MORRIS\s\ ._ ~ ~~ .. ~ _ , __J ...~. s .. . . N~V ~ 2 2005 Scrial No. C - 05164599 OOSN Rev. 3/78 i. ti ~. Sep 21 05 03:05p .~ COBB, ESQ ';-441-3024 p.4 ~~~~~~~ . CO NT SCHEDULE A COMMITMENT NO: C-05164599 FII.E NO: 05164599 EFFECTIVE DATE: September 200.5_ \~~ ~\~ Inquires Should be Directed to: Q~ ROBIN STARNES PH STEWART TITLE OF PINELLAS, INC. 1212 COURT STREET, SUITE C-1 CLEARWATER, FL 33756 ~ • PHONE: (727) 447-9746 TOLL FREE: 1-866-447-8815 rstarnes@stewart.com r 1. POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: AMOUNT (a) ALTA OWNER'S POLICY - (10-17-92) with Florida Modifications $ 6 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 Proposed Insured: EWING DEVELOPMENT, LLP, a Florida Limited Liability Partnership (b) ALTA LOAN POLICY - (10-17-92) with Florida Modifications $ 5 5 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 Proposed Insured: BANK OF FLORIDA-TAMPA BAY a Florida State•Charter Bank, and/or their respective successors and assigns, as their interests may appear 2. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: Fee Simple 3. Title to said estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: JOEL J. KEHRER and FRANK L. McKINLEY 4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: Lots 11, 12, 13, 26, 27 and 28,..Block "B", COACHMAN HEIGHTS, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 26, Public Records of Pinellas .County, Florida. END OF SCHEDULE A ~ I ~' .. , , ._ ~ -~nv c 2 zo~5 This Commitment is not an abstract, examination, report, or representation of facCOr title and does not STEWART TITLE create and shall not be the basis of any claim for negligence, negligent misrepresentation or other tort GUARANTY COMPANY claim or action. The sole liability of Company and its Title Insurance Agent shall arise under Gad be Governed by pazagraph 3 of the Conditions. - - - i.~ , ~, Sep 21 05,_ 03,: 05p { ~'J~JCOHB, ESQ 7~-441 -3024 p. 5 t~~U (` 2 ~OQS ~ E ~e+'.1 ~ ~~~ ~ ' ~ J ~~ ~ . ~ - . ~ IBS-CHEDiTLE B -SECTION I _. 3 1~ ~ a - ,., ~ . j COMNIITMENT NO: C-05164599 FILE NO: OS~`6 599 ~~~~~~~ The following ace the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. Prvvf that the Purchaser is a L7.mited Liability Partnership in good standing with the office of the Secretary of State in its state of incorporation. '~ti Partnership Affidavit from the Purchasaer authorizing the mil" roposed purchase and mortgage and stating who is to execute the ~1~ documents. 3. arranty deed from JOEL J.. KEHRER and FRANK L. McKINLEY esting fee simple title in EWING DEVELOPMENT, LLP, a Florida limited liability partnership. NOTE: The proposed deed should designate the subject property as vacant or commercial land; , not the homestead of the Grantor(s); the Grantor(s) as single; or Grantor(s) being joined by the Grantors~s spouse. Mortgage from EWING DEVELOPMENT, LLP, a Florida limited liability partnership to BANK OF FLORIDA-TAMPA BAY, a Florida ,~t3te Charter Bank to secure the sum of $552,500.00. NOTE: All parties executing the foregoing required instruments shall provide a photo identification - e.g. valid drivers license, military I.D., or state I.D. card bearing photograph. NOTE: Funds collected at closing in excess of $500.00 must be in U.S. Funds in the form of cashiers check, official bank check, money order, certified check or wired funds, unless payment is approved by issuing agent prior to closing. Sale proceeds disbursed via outgoing wire transfer are subject to State of Florida Department of Insurance Rate Rule 4-186.008 and must be requested in advance of scheduled closing. NOTE: ANY AND ALL FLORIDA ALTA ENDORSEMENTS YOU MAY REQUIRE WILL BE FURNISHED WITH YOUR FINAL MORTGAGEE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY.. NOTE: INCLUSION OF FLORIDA FORM 9 AND/OR THE NAVIGATIONAL SERVITUDE ENDORSEMENT(S) ARE SUBJECT TO EXAMINATION OF RESTRICTIONS, RECEIPT ANL1 EXAMINATION OF RN ACCEPTABLE SURVEY AND COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT SEARCH. NOTE: IF THE MORTGAGE IS ASSIGNED AND THE ASSIGNEE IS TO BE INSURED, THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTION WILL APPEAR IN THE FINAL POLICY UNLESS A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE ENDORSED TO THE ASSIGNEE IS RECEIVED BY STEWART TITLE OF PINELLAS, INC.: °Impairment, loss or failure of title to the beneficial interest transferred to said insured resulting from :(a)lack.of possession of the original promissory note secured by the Continued on next page STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Sep 21 05 03:06p J C COBB, ESQ 727-441-3024 p.6 ~-~ ~• COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B - SECTION I CONTINUED ' CONf1~fITMENT NO: C-05164599 ~ i.~' ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ FILE NO: 05164599 insured mortgage, or (b)the absence from the original promissory note .of a proper endorsement to the insured assignee." END OF SCHEDULE B - SECTION I ' i Sep 21 05 03:06p J C COBB, ESQ 727-441=3024~•--••I ~ -- -~ p.'7 • ~~~ ~ ~ 105 . SCHEDULE B -SECTION II ~-, ~. " •' ,r, ~ w ~ " • ~ . - ~ ~ COMMITMENT NO: C-05164599 FILE NO: 05164599 Schedule B of the policy or policies fo be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Compaay: efects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or offer matters, if any, created, fnst appeazing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the Proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. Standazd Exceptions: (a) Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. (b) Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. (c) Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. (d) Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material hereto or hereafter famished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. (e) Rights of dower, homestead or other marital rights of the spouse, if any, of any individual insured. (f) Any adverse ownership claim by the State of Florida by right of sovereignty to any portion of the lands insured hereunder, including submerged, filled, and artificially exposed lands and lands accreted to such lands. 3. Special Exceptions: 4. Taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. Tax Parcel No. 15/29/15/16830/002/0110 Gross Amount for 2004 $2,756.33. (Paid 3/16/2005) 5. Taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. Tax Parcel No. 15/29/15/16830/002/0120 Gross Amount for 2004 $732.72. (Paid 3/16/2005) 6. Taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. Tax Parcel No. 15/29/15/16830/002/0130 Gross Amount for 2004 $732.72. (Paid 3/16/2005) 7. Taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. Tax .Parcel No. 15/29/15/16830/002/0260 Gross Amount for 2004 $732.72. (Paid 3/16/2005) e. Taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. Tax Parcel No. 15/29/15/16830/002/0270 Gross Amount for 2004 $732.72. (Paid 3/16/2005) 9. Taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. Tax Parcel No. 15/29/15/16830/002./0280 Gross Amount for 2004 $732.72. (Paid 3/16/2005). 10. PERSONAL PROPERTY taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. Tax Account No. 0046172 Gross Amount for 2004 $1,534.36. (Paid 3/30/2005) 11. Survey prepared by Frederick S. Bachmann, #5174 of Survey Pros, Continued on next page STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY . Sep 21 05 03:06p J C COBH, ESQ 7 7-441-3024 p.8 l~ CONIlVIITMENT SCHEDULE B -SECTION II CONTINUED • COMMITMENT N0: C-05164599 FILE NO: 05164599 Tnc. dated 06/15/2005 as Job No. 05-0452 reveals the following encroachments: 8 foot chain link fence into adjacent property to the South; , Concrete, Apron into adjacent propety to the South. END OF SCHEDULE B - SECTION II -. _ ~ ~ i ~ - - - ~ .- .i ~Q'il Q ,~ ~QQ~ ' Sep 21 05 03:05p J •~HH, ESq 7 -~1-3024 p.2 1 _ ~. Prepared By ' STEWART TITLE OF PINELLAS, INC. Return to: ROBIN J.P. STARVES STEWART TITLE OF PINELLAS, INC. 1212 COURT STREET, SUITE C-1 CLEARWATER, FL 33756 05164599, WARRANTY DEED. ~±n~~ r 2 205 ~'~ 6~ ~~ _; ~ ~~ ~_ i--_ .fin .J •~.1~ J'ti _~. .r. , ,y~,~ ~,' - .. .s This btdenture, Made this a/b ~-t day of ,sEp~m 6~ ~ ~tJdS Between JOEL J. KEHRER and FRANK L. McKINLEY grantor*, whosemai[ingaddressis 501 S. Ft. Harrison Ave, #206, Clearwater, FL 33756 and EWING DEVELOPMENT, LLP, a Florida general partnership qualified as a limited liability partnership grantee+, whose mailing address is 2840 West Bay Drive, #279 Belleair Bluffs, FL 33770 ""Cranlor' and "Grantee"are used far singular or plural, as context requires. Witnesseth, That said grantor, for and in consideration of t/:e sum of Ten ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby aclaiowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being i-l Pinellas County, Florida., to wit; Lots 11, 12, 13, 26, 27 and 28, Block "8~~, COACHMAN HEIGHTS, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 26, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. THIS IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY OF THE GRANTORS NAMED HEREIN. BSIN(3 KNOWN AS PARCEL NOS. 15/29/15/16830/002/0110, 15/29/15/16830/002/0120, 15/29/15/16830/002/01,30, 15/29/15/16830/002/0260, 15/29/15/16830/002/0270, 15/29/15/16830/002/0280 Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record. Together, with all t/te tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with .raid c,anrea thnr rho „T„„.,,.:.• 1,,..,~.n.. ~,....~,r ..o ~,.:a ~__., :~ ~ - --..__,__ .~_:.,_ _ and associates, inc. The Client's Engineering Solution. An Employee Owned Company. November 1, 2005 City of Clearwater Planriing Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: Ela Townhomes -Flexible Standard Development Application 211 Ewing Avenue CR!G'~PJAL On behalf of our client, we are submitting this application for Flexible Standard Development for the above referenced site. Please find enclosed the following documents for your review: • Fifteen (15) copies of the Flexible Standards Application, • Fifteen (15) copies of the Project Narrative, • Fifteen (15) sets of construction drawings, • Fifteen (15) copies of the construction drawings on 8-1/2x11, • Fifteen (15) sets of the Survey, • Fifteen (15) copies of the Building Elevations on 11x17, • Fifteen (15) copies of the Building Elevations on 8-1/2x11, • Fifteen (15) copies of Deed, showing proof of ownership, • One (1) copy of the Downtown Stormwater Pond application, • A check for $475 to cover the application submittal fee. The Preliminary Plat will be submitted under separate cover. The project consists of a 24-unit townhome community in the Downtown District between Ewing Avenue and MLK Jr Avenue, souht of Pierce Street. The property lies within the Downtown Stormwater Service District, and the required application has been submitted to Ms. Terry Finch in the Engineering Department. A copy of this application has been included for your reference. In accordance with Clearwater codes, a project narrative addressing the Downtown Design Guidelines is included for your review. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at (813) 882-4815. Sincerely, BURCAW AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Brian S. Wilkes, E.I. Project Manager cc: Ewing Development, LLP File 05747 PR NOV U 2 2~~5 • 8402 West Linebaugh Avenue • Suite A • Tampa, Florida 3362$ Tel 8'18.882.48'1 5 • Fax 81 3.882.3808 www.burcawinc.com ~~c ~~8 ~~~~~~~~~1_ FLS2005-11089 211 E WING AVE Date Received: 11/02/2005 ice' `'?i `' `~ ~ ~ ~~ ~- ELA TOWNHOMES ~'~~ ZONING DISTRICT: D LAND USE: CBD ATLAS PAGE: 287A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet S~'t" ''I`' ~ Receipt #: 1200500000000010961 ~ ~~= Date:ll/02/2005 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description FLS2005-11089 03 Flex Std-Commercial Payments: • Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check EWING DEVELOPMENT LLP R D 1004 s....~ l,,,s ,~ ~ ~ rr -~~ `'r;l~~ c ~ -r; `~~~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Z ~U ~ ~~ V In Person Payment Total: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page ] of 1 11/2/2005 12:19:49PM Revenue Account No Amount Paid 010-341262 Line Item Total: 475.00 $475.00 475.00 $475.00 cReceipt.rpt ~Je[i7rsr ~R .N ii i~;-. 4w t ~'. ~.. -.f~~ ,, ~~ _~~Y ., Conditions Associated With BCP2006-12156 211 EWING AVE The following conditions must be satisfied before the permit can be processed. Building Review 02/06/2007 02/06/2007 02/06/2007 Jeff Walker 562-4863 NOTE -Please cloud any/all changes on the plans before returning them for re-review. - A response letter shall be submitted with all responses for clarification. NOTE -Additional Conditions may be necessary based on the responses to conditions or to new information not on hand at time of review. PLANS MUST BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER - (NOTE Section 104.2.2 of the FBC-Building) -Seal of Structural Engineer is not current, i.e. "Certificate" Total project under roof area is 535,592 sgft? Please correct. Status Not Met Not Met Not Met 02/06/2007 Confirm that aTie-In Survey (City D&NSD Policy Memo #02.2) will be submitted prior to Not Met commencing any further work after the foundation is complete. This survey will indicate the building's location on the lot. In addition confirm an elevation certificate will be submitted substantiating conformance to FEMA required elevations (i.e. A zones: top of slab, V zones bottom of beam). If applicable, ensure that NGVD to NAVD conversions are correct (i.e. -0.88'). 02/06/2007 UL 905 fire barrier tenant separation wall specified, but assembly shown does not match UL Not Met assembly, i.e. wood furring, etc.? Please address. 02/06/2007 Ensure smoke detectors are placed in all bedrooms, etc as per NEC 2005. See elect. comment. Not Met 02/06/2007 Specify materials and design for handrails and guardrails as per FRC 311 & 312. Not Met 02/06/2007 Provide a section that shows the ceiling height of the toilet rooms that are located off of the stair's Not Met intermediate landing (units C & E). 02/06/2007 Ensure fireblocking is provided for concealed space as per 602.1.2 Not Met 02/06/2007 Only those units with elevators are FHA covered dwelling units (all floors). Specify on dwgs the Not Met FHA design requirements, i.e.; kitchen, bathroom clear floor space, bathroom specification, elevator dimensions, etc. 02/06/2007 Use NEC 2005 not 2002 as code reference. Not Met 02/06/2007 Cover page: number of bldgs 10, number of units 19? Not Met 02/06/2007 Show section/detail of fire wall at hip roof. Not Met 02/06/2007 Specify on dwgs the tenant separation and exterior wall insulation as per 13-602. Not Met 02/06/2007 Please provide a product approval package for this project, complete with manufactures Not Met installation instructions, to meet the Florida Product Approval requirements. The covered products are; Windows, Skylights, Exterior doors, Shutters, Roofing, Structural Components, New and Innovative building envelope products. (Note - Go to www.boaf.net and click on Product Approval for details) -Windows (impact protected) 02/06/2007 Where on the dwgs is the nailing schedule for exterior wall sheathing? Not Met ~' CaseConditons Print Date: 02/27/2007 ~\ Page 1 of 4 BCP2006-12156 211 EWING AVE Building Review Jeff Walker 562-4863 4y' 02/06/2007 Exterior wall finish on wood calls for stucco on paper backed metal lath. Be cautioned that the Not Met new 2004 code (Oct 2005), based on the ICC code, requires at least two layers of grade D paper under the metal lath. This provides a drainage plain between the paper layers after stucco shrinkage occurs. Recent failures of local building envelopes using single layer paper systems reinforces the timeliness and importance of the new code change. 02/06/2007 Review the windows adjacent to intermediate stair landings (i.e. unit B) and bath tubs for safety Not Met glass requirement of R308.4. 02/06/2007 Provide protection for all exposed EWH in garage (see plumbing condition). Not Met Electrical Review Jeff Walker 562-4863 02/06/2007 Why do the panel connected and demand load/amps do not match the values given in the Calc Not Met table on E-8? 02/06/2007 Provide neutral load calcs for those units with feeders that contain neutrals smaller than the Not Met ungrounded conductors. 02/06/2007 Review all the floor plans versus all the panels as the AHU and HP callouts do not always match. Not Met Check OCPD for the same, to ensure they match conductor and disconnect rating, i.e. Panel E-3 AHU 3 vs AHU -1 note 16. 02/06/2007 E-3: EF missing from 3rd floor bathroom. Not Met 02/06/2007 Ensure fire rated tenant separation wall penetration by electrical outlets adhere to R317.3.2. Not Met 02/06/2007 E-6: Laundry outlet missing from 3rd floor plan. Not Met 02/06/2007 Clarify exactly what are the ratings of the OCPDs for all unit feeders, in addition to the model no.s Not Met specified. 02/06/2007 It appears that the OCPD for the house panel feeder is 200A whereas the conductor ampacity is Not Met only 100A? 02/07/2007 Missing some SD on dwgs E-3 & E-5. Not Met 02/09/2007 It appears that the use of a 1000A OCPD for a service lateral of 930 ampacity violates art. 240.4 Not Met (C)~ Engineering Review Steve Doherty 562-4773 01/30/2007 Final plat for "Ewing Street Townhomes" shall be recorded with Pinellas County prior to the Not Met issuance of a building permit. (Community Development Code 4-708) 01/30/2007 Address assignments shall be made for each of the individual townhomes in this development Not Met prior to issuance of building permits for each of the townhomes. Address assignment cannot be made until final plat is recorded and a street name is provided. 01/30/2007 Sewer impact fee of $900.00 per unit shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. Not Met 01/30/2007 Water impact fee of $480.00 per unit shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. Not Met 01/30/2007 Provide an engineered site and utility plans signed and sealed by a registered professional Not Met engineer from the State of Florida. (Florida Administrative Code 61G15-23.002). The utility plan shall show all existing public and private utilities. (Community Development Code 4-202). 01/30/2007 Additional comments will be forthcoming upon submission of the required site plan. Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 02/27/2007 Page 2 of 4 BCP2006-12156 211 EWING AVE Eri4ironmental Review Downtown District "Buy-In" fee to be paid prior to issuance of permit. Not Met Fire Review Ann Downes-Blackburn 562-4327xt3062 01/25/2007 All fire sprinker work must be done per NFPA-13R 2002 edition, by a licensed fire sprinkler Not Met contractor with separate permit and plans. 2/12/2007 Condition not met. (JFK) 01/25/2007 Fire sprinkler system to be monitored, all fire alarm work to be done per NFPA-72 2002 edition by Not Met licensed fire alarm contractor with separate permit and plans. 2/12/2007 Condition not met. (JFK) 01/25/2007 All fire underground work must be done by a contractor with a Class I, II or V license. Not Met 2/12/2007 Conditon not met. (JFK) 01/25/2007 Include Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 in summary of codes. Not Met 2/12/2007 Condition not met. (JFK) 01/25/2007 Provide site plan showing 24 ft roadway, hydrants and fire lines, FDC's, and 30 ft turning radii for Not Met emergency vehicle ingress and egress. 2/12/2007 All conditions not met. (JFK) 01/26/2007 Maintain clearances of 7.5 ft from all sides of FDC's, (including shrubbery and other equipment). Not Met 2/12/2007 Condition not met. (JFK) Land Resource Review Rick Albee 727-562-4741 01/10/2007 Submit 8 sets of civil and landscape drawing. Additional comments may be forthcoming once this Not Met data is received and reviewed. 01/10/2007 Apply for a Clearing and Grubbing permit. Not Met 01/10/2007 Apply for a Tree Removal permit. Not Met Mechanical Review Jeff Walker 562-4863 02/06/2007 M-1.2: Move return, 2nd floor, completely out of kitchen area. Not Met 02/06/2007 Please show how condensate will be disposed of and where - Not Met Condensate not allowed to discharge into sanitary sewer system -City of Clearwater Code Sec. 32.212 (1) (b) 12 -may discharge to drywell or storm (see plumbing comment). 02/06/2007 Ensure condensate high level cut-off switch or equivalent is installed. Not Met 02/06/2007 Specify (mech. or struct.) how CU curb is fastened to roof deck/structure to withstand 123 mph Not Met wind load. MISC -General Jahayra Camara 01/16/2007 NEED INDIVIDUAL ADDRESS FOR PROJECT Not Met Parks 8 Recreation Debbie Reid 562-4818 12/19/2006 Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if Not Met applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. CaseConditons Print Date: 02/27/2007 Page 3 of 4 BCP2006-12156 211 EWING AVE Parks 8 Recreation Debbie Reid 562-4818 'r 12/19/2006 The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of Not Met building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727-562-4837 to calculate the assessment. Plumbing Review Jeff Walker 562-4863 02/06/2007 Unprotected EWH in garage must be protected from vehicle contact, i.e. bollard, wing wall, etc. Not Met Note: Exceptional plumbing plans, congratulations! 02/06/2007 Please show how condensate will be disposed of and where - Not Met Condensate not allowed to discharge into sanitary sewer system -City of Clearwater Code Sec. 32.212 (1) (b) 12 -may discharge to drywell or storm. Stormwater Review Phuong Vo 562-4752 01/30/2007 1. Provide the approved SWFWMD permit. Not Met 2. Applicant to contact Ed Chesney at 562-4742 to make payment in-lieu-of providing water quality and stormwater attenuation. Traffic Review Bennett Elbo 562-4775 01/22/2007 Submit civil site plan for Traffic Operation Division's comments. Not Met Zoning Review Justyna Buszewski 562-4567x2667 01/26/2007 Submitt 8 copies of civil site plan. Not Met 01/26/2007 Comply with following condition of approval on FLS2005-11089: Not Met Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, a double detector check valve with bypass meter shall be required for any internal fire protection line; 01/26/2007 Comply with following condition of approval on FLS2005-11089: Not Met Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, Crushed concrete shall be utilized instead of crushed rock for base under architectural paver walkways; 01/26/2007 Comply with following condition of approval on FLS2005-11089: Not Met Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, Doghouse manhole shall be set on either a pre-cast or poured in place concrete slab; 01/26/2007 Comply with following condition of approval on FLS2005-11089: Not Met Obtain permit for all work in City rights-of-way prior to the issuance of any site or building permit; 01/26/2007 Comply with following condition of approval on FLS2005-11089: Not Met Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, the landscape plan and plant material schedule be revised to make the plant quantities consistent. 01/26/2007 Comply with following condition of approval on FLS2005-11089: Not Met Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit prior to the issuance of a site or building permit; 01/26/2007 Can not approve until) final plat is submitted and approved. Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 02/27/2007 Page 4 of 4 location Map Owner. ~ Hudson, Scott ~ Case: ~ FLD2005-1 1 1 07 Property Site: 2862 Gulf To Bc~y Blvd Size(Acres): 0.484 Henson, Cannon PIN: I 17-29-16-00000-130-3100 Atlas Page: ~ 291 B S:\Planning Department\C D B\forms and she-Is\Map request forms2003\FLD Map request form.doc _ _ k ~ ~. I ~. ~ - _~ ti - .~ -~ ~ ~ -- } A g _ . ~. l j ~ ~.: J~ {' ~+ i ; ~% III J • ~ ~ ' ~~ r ~ ~ ~ ` _ Y_. 1 f ,mow F ~ r l i r. ;,,+. ~ar• ~ ~ ~ ~ _.... 1-~.- ~ 7G. ,..=a-a'~ .~.,.r,+~.,.}...~`+ ~ - _ .~~ Rt'a w*r. ;,c, ~ ~-~tsbgss. _ ?~'+eraP~'4E r r; E~t~t~rr~~.~.is r ~ .i; - t . ~'!~ • e f* ,. 4~.. i ` _.E~ f ~ `rt, ~~ rst ~ . ~ ~" _ ~~ - -~ . > ' 7 a ~, ~ ~~ ~ ~ -~ i, ~-.~ A erial M ap Owner: ~ Hudson, Scott Case: FLD2005-1 1 1 07 Site: ~ 2862 Gulf To Bay Blvd 'Property 0.484 Size (Acres) PIN: 17-29-16-00000-130-3100 Henson, Cannon Atlas Page: 2916 S:\Planning Department\C D B\fomis and shells\Map request forms2003\FLD Map request form.doc 1 ~i I ~ I ~ -- --- - ---- r W -J ~4 -- I 1 I __~ -l L~ r-3p0 ' 301 t I I I 1 r I 209 _ ~ -- I I I---- - 1 1 ~ 1 ?__i Q ~--' r-~ 293i -~, ~-- - t ~---' r ~ \ ~ ~---~ ~ /1 /J 304 - 3 II5 218 ; ' I ~~ r ~ -~ TT ~,~ ~ - - '- 1 ; 1 ~ ! --~ j (~ II ~~ //j ~~ ,~ -I ,' = (/ ~/ I I t__I ~ -, ~ 11SE I - , - ~ I-, 308 p X08 i I_, I 1~ ~ -- r_~ =_- t ` ~---I I-- ~ I l i '----1 ' - L-, I I I L , II __ ~ L , _ _ I I ` 1 ~ ~ _ r1 I I I O ; ~' ~ _? MDR 4 ~ ~ W 329 ~ - ~ ~ t - _ __ _~ 1 '~ i_f ~ -- ~ I--- i r-~, r r--~ I I r==j I ~~ r' 31 J 7 _ T `t ~ ~ i Q r- ~ ~ I ---' r--I r-L I r--~ 1 ~ r-1 l ~ ---I L I ~- ~ `- I 345 S- I ~, I t I __~ r I` L__ i =_ I r~ --1 -r r--- 1 -- f ~ i i i _~20 321 L ~b2 ~--I, i i ~_' ~ i -- ~ y 1 i _t r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r--I 'S I ~ 1 _ 325 _ ~ Q I '~ t I r-L L T ` 1 L f f--l` I I L ` --- ' I- ~ 32 1 ~ N J 31 b L--.• --- ~ -~ :--, J ~-= r L -- i r j ~ 1- i I f ~o W ~j I ' __ ~~ 4 L ~ r-, 1 l ~ __J I I -- - __~ _ 'Y -- r ~ I L-I --I Y-~ 5- i - I l ~ r--, I ~~ I I 1 I---~ I I I I I `---I I---t I 1 1 1 ~ 400 , ~i --- --- 401 ~ ~ 404 407 r--^ 1 I ~-----~ t ~ 1~ if L ~ g ~-, ~ I I 1 1 I j- I r~I__'1 ~- ~ ~ -- i I I ` ~ I-~ ~ 1-- r-- -1 1 2890 ~ r-- ~_ I ~ r 4i3 I I i I I -----t i I I I I I II I 1 1 I~ I t -~-- 1 I 1 I 1 ____ r---- ~ 1 ~ i ' I -t --- i i_I - ` - - -- ~ r ~ ti I y I , I I NI L_I NI 1 1 m I I~ L___I N ------,.--~ 'n N --- m~ m l N L__ o I ^ I ~_-r r 1 I 1 m I ~I N N v °i °f N N 1 m I w II i N - r GULF-TO-BAY BLVD C N N N N I ap I N -_ --~ 1 ' 1 ' I N I 1 I i ~~ 1 L_1-J I '~ / ~` ` 1 I / ~ ~ ~ ,~ ,,,~ ~ ~ / L ~J ~ I ., ; ., ; ,,,~ I -~_I ; -, I I I _ i -1--- i ~ `~l r-_, f 9 r- I 1 - I I I..J ~ ~ , 1 i , j , ` ~ r 1 11 ; ; HDR , , ; ~, Zoning Map Owner. ~ Hudson, Scott ~ Case: FLD2005-1 1 107 Site: ~ 2862 Gulf To Bay Blvd I ~ Property 0.484 Size(Acres) : PIN: 17-29-16-00000-130-3100 Henson, Cannon i Atlas Page: 291 B S:\Planning Department\C D B\forms and shelfs\Map request torms2003\FLD Map request form.doc 1 ~ I ~ ~ -- --- ---- ~ I _ 214 I I ~--: l~ r-~ _ ~1 I __ ~ I 2Q9 I L, f r-- ~ ~ -- ~ ~ I--- ; i--~i - `__I L- I I ~ _ 2131 ,i _- i i `--J ~ ~ ~---~ ~ I' - ~ - /~ // r-1304 w , Sus ~ ` r 218 I I ~ ; 1 ~--I L__ r I~ ~ j Y//~ 1 ~ ~ ~--I 217 1~ - ~I _-_' c-, , __ ; ---I _I -' 308 0 ~OB `_ _ ~ - _ `-_-I t r __- I ~ ---I 1 I L 1 ~ I r-- "/ " ` ~ 317 r _ _ ~ ~_ ~_ l r I ~ ~ l I~ I 1 I - ~ , 1 I - 312 i -I Q 0 31'3--1 lr I - - 1sa ' -f4 w 321 `--I ~ ~ -- ~_~ r--1 ~- ~ J te rte' I ~ ~___ I_-~ __ I--- 1 r ~ 1 1 r I I ~ ~ -- `- r--- r I ~ ~ j 388 ~ - - I r' ~- --r 1- 1.~.. 1 1 I j I __ r X31 3~T-~I i Q _ l-_-~ r--, ~ ~ (- Ll j r _ _ r--~ 1~ rl ~ ---1 L -_ r ~ i i ~-~ ti 1 ~ 345 ti t __~ ; 1 1 I `__ ~ r~-, L L__ -r r--- ~ ~-- ~ t ~20 321 t o6 w 347 ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ~ L I ~ ~ y r~ -t _ 2 _, l__I ~ _ ~ ~ I ti S I ~ ---/ I_ ~ I r f ~ -, Cr I I r--1 324 I- 325 ~ 31i1 L--' , _I `'--' ~ ~ ' ~ L---r 1 ~ r-- ~ 1 ~ I _ -380 ~ • ~-- - ,--i ; --- - ~_-_I I 1- I 1 r a , __~ ~ _- i j - i -, I I I I - 4Q0 , s E -'y 1 `--J 1---' ~---I 1--- 401 ~ ~ I ~' 407 --- -- I I~ 5 s - I I 1 1 I I i I ao4 i--- AUt ~ mot I - i 1 r L ~ I ; r 1 I I I ~ 1 r--, z8fo at3 I Servi I• I a Sta~~op _____f I I I II 1 ; ; ;; ; ~ , ; 11 -~ ~ -__ ~ ; I ~et~ I ~~ales ~t--- _, ; 5 -- 1 t~ v~ ~ ~'~J r~l ~ ~ ~ ' ml i I NI L-_-I N N ~ ~_-~.~..__ ~ N N i N - GULF-TO-BAY BLVD -- Retail Sale i ~~V N & Service N N r----, ----- i uD ~ , ~ " N 1 I Kest ~4rant ; --~ ~ ' - ~ ~__r-- i~ ~ ^~~ I~~~i ~\J~. ~ I 1 ~ 1 \ ~ m `~'~'~~' ~~~ ~~ ~ . ~ <, -`~ Attache®,1~wellings I__ I I , ~_ L ~ r-'---. i ~, / - -- 1 ; 4 i _ i f / I 1 ' 1 , / I I Existing Use Map Owner. Hudson, Scott Case: FLD2005-11107 Site: 2862 Gulf To Bay Blvd Aec e 0.484 s~: Sze( PAN: 17-2 9-16-00000-130-3100 Henson, Cannon Atlas Page: 291 B S:\Planning Department\C D B\fomu and shells\Map request fomu2003\FLD Map request torm.doc Subject Property -Front Parking Lot. Subject Property -rear building. FLS2005-11107 2862 Gulf To Bay Boulevard Subject property -Freestanding Signage. a_ ~ ~ _ -' ~ ~:. a.. _.. ~ e~ Subject Property -Rear parking area. 1 of 4 Property to the East S&M Truck World. Property to the East. FLS2005-11107 2862 Gulf To Bay Boulevard Property to the East -Anchor Signs. Property to the East. 2 of 4 - ~ i . - .. - ~ ,f ro ~~ _~ ~.F - .. ~ .' ~` Property to the West -Gas Station. Property to the South -Restaurant FLS2005-11107 2862 Gulf To Bay Boulevard 3 of 4 Property to the East. Property to the North -Single Family Residential (zoned Commercial). Property to the South - Bayview Gardens. +~ A ' r ~~,~~ ~`~= CITY OF CLEARWAT~R ~+~', t `-.,1~ ~; PLANNING DEPARTMENT =////,~~`~"'"'~ ~~+~ Posr OFFICE Box 4748, CLFJ~RWATER, FI.oRIDA 33758-4748 '•~i'I,ER,,,++ MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUT-FI MYRTI,F. AVENUE, CI.FARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TF.I,F.PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW March 23, 2006 Mr. Brian Wilkes Burcaw & Associates 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue Suite A Tampa, FL 33625 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-11089 at 211 Ewing Avenue Dear Mr. Wilkes: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On August 4, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 24-unit townhome community in the Downtown Town .Lake Residential Character District, per Section 2-902.C. The DRC APPROVED the application based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law with the following conditions of approval: Findings of Fact/Conclusions of Law: 1. The subject 1.033-acre site is zoned Downtown Town Lake Residential Character District; 2. The proposal complies with Attached Dwelling criteria under the provisions of Section 2-902.C; 3. The proposal complies with requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 4. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; 5. The proposal will conform to the Downtown Design Guidelines; 6. Flexibility in regard to use are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel; and 8. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, the landscape plan and plant material schedule be revised to make the plant quantities consistent; 2. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first; F~:nNI: t-tilsitniti), Mnvolt t3u.i. )onsoN, VI(a;-Mnvok Jour [)oknn, Coun(:u..w:~n;r:h Horr Hn\111:fON, Councu.nntMisi:r. ® Cnici.i:N A. PFTlatsr:N, Coun(ai ~n:auseH "I:QUAI. I:MPLOY~4IiN'I' ANI) AL'I'IRMA"I'IVIi AC"PION I;MPLOYI?R" M i March 23, 2006 FLS2005-11089 ` Page 2 3. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, a double detector check valve with bypass meter shall be required for any internal fire protection line; 4. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, Crushed concrete shall be utilized instead of crushed rock for base under architectural paver walkways; 5. The City of Clearwater will provide water taps; set the water meters and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees, prior to the issuance of any site or building permit; 6. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, Doghouse manhole shall be set on either a pre- cast or poured in place concrete slab; 7. Obtain permit for all work in City rights-of--way prior to the issuance of any site or building permit; 8. Final payment for buy-in to Downtown Stormwater Service District is required prior to the issuance of a building permit; 9. Provide an additional type C grate inlet on the private road that connects MLK to Ewing. This is to accommodate the amount of runoff generated in a 10 year storm on a road with a 2% grade; 10. The storm pipe proposed on Ewing Ave is to be 18" RCP to accommodate post-development; 11. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit prior to the issuance of a site or building permit; 12. Provide a screen around both the electric transformers to make them less obtrusive, but not inaccessible (fence, wall, and/or landscaping); 13. Mechanical and utilities equipment that are placed at grade must be placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of--ways with fences, walls, and/or landscaping; 14. The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC; 15. The final design of the site and landscape plan be consistent with the plans submitted to the DRC; and 16. All signage be consistent to the design/colors submitted and comply with the requirements of the signage portion of the Community Development Code and Downtown Design Guidelines. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with above conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the application dated received November 2, 2005 and revised site plans and building elevations dated received March 8, 200. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (March 23, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years. of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. An extension of time maybe granted by the Community Development Coordinator for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Coordinator may approve an additional extension of time not to exceed one year for good cause shown and documented in writing. The coordinator must receive the request for this extension within the one-year period of validity after the original time extension. The Community Development Coordinator may approve an additional extension of time not S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Vnactive or Finished CaseslEwing 211 Ewing Street Townhomes (D) - ApprovedlFLS2005-11089 Development Order.doc J March 23, 2006 FLS2005-11089 ~` Page 3 to exceed on year for good cause shown and documented in writing. The coordinator must receive the request for this extension within the one-year period of the validity after the original extension. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner II at 727-562-4547. Sincerely, _., Michael Delk, AIC~ Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D p 1 a,`~. , ~. E: ~,~a : w ~ ; ' c ' ~ t - ~ I I `' \ ro l ., c,., ~ ' ~ ~; ' --~ gTER +' ~~iilli LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVIi1.OPMENT REVIEW March 23, 2006 Mr. Brian Wilkes Burcaw & Associates 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue Suite A Tampa, FL 33625 CITYrJF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEAftV~IATER, FLORinA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILnING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVF:NUF., CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TF.I.EPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-11089 at 211 Ewing Avenue Dear Mr. Wilkes: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On August 4, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 24-unit townhome community in the Downtown Town .Lake Residential Character District, per Section 2-902.C. The DRC APPROVED the application based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law with the following conditions of approval: Findings of Fact/Conclusions of Law: 1. The subject 1.033-acre site is zoned Downtown Town Lake Residential Character District; 2. The proposal complies with Attached Dwelling criteria under the provisions of Section 2-902.C; 3. The proposal complies with requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 4. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; 5. The proposal will conform to the Downtown Design Guidelines; 6. Flexibility in regard to use are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel; and 8. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, the landscape plan and plant material schedule be revised to make the plant quantities consistent; 2. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first; PI:nNk Hniltnla~, Mnvc~ie I3u.i.)c>nso~~, Vu:r•.-Mnvoll JOIIN I~OK~W, C(HTCIL~IIi?Ilielz Horr Hnn~u_roN, C~uncn.n~rn~lLia: ® CnIZ1.1:N A. PI:rlaisFN, Ccxmc:u ~u:aulrH "EQUAL. I:MI>LCwMI•:N~r nNn nFFIRn•In~rlvr: Ac:r10N I:MPLOI"IiR" March 23, 2006 FLS2005-11089 ' Page 2 3. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, a double detector check valve with bypass meter shall be required for any internal fire protection line; 4. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, Crushed concrete shall be utilized instead of crushed rock for base under architectural paver walkways; 5. The City of Clearwater will provide water taps; set the water meters and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees, prior to the issuance of any site or building permit; 6. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, Doghouse manhole shall be set on either a pre- cast or poured in place concrete slab; 7. Obtain permit for all work in City rights-of--way prior to the issuance of any site or building permit; 8. Final payment for buy-in to Downtown Stormwater Service District is required prior to the issuance of a building permit; 9. Provide an additional type C grate inlet on the private road that connects MLK to Ewing. This is to accommodate the amount of runoff generated in a 10 year storm on a road with a 2% grade; 10. The storm pipe proposed on Ewing Ave is to be 18" RCP to accommodate post-development; 11. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit prior to the issuance of a site or building permit; 12. Provide a screen around both the electric transformers to make them less obtrusive, but not inaccessible (fence, wall, and/or landscaping); 13. Mechanical and utilities equipment that are placed at grade must be placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of--ways with fences, walls, and/or landscaping; 14. The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC; 15. The final design of the site and landscape plan be consistent with the plans submitted to the DRC; and 16. All signage be consistent to the design/colors submitted and comply with the requirements of the signage portion of the Community Development Code and Downtown Design Guidelines. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with above conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the application dated received November 2, 2005 and revised site plans and building elevations dated received March 8, 200. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (March 23, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years. of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. An extension of time maybe granted by the Community Development Coordinator for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Coordinator may approve an additional extension of time not to exceed one year for good cause shown and documented in writing. The coordinator must receive the request for this extension within the one-year period of validity after the original time extension. The Community Development Coordinator may approve an additional extension of time not S: (Planning DepartnientlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Unactive or Finished CaseslEwing 211 Ewing Street Townhomes (D) - ApprovedlFLS2005-11089 Development Order.doc March 23, 2006 FLS2005-11089 Page 3 to exceed on year for good cause shown and documented in writing. The coordinator must receive the request for this extension within the one-year period of the validity after the original extension. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that maybe required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, ple; Sincerely, v ~-~° Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director S: lPlanning DepartmentiC D BlFlex Standen a 4~.f ~, k ", ~' ;~`` ~-°~:~ ~ I'TS' C~ F ~ LEI~RWAT E R =r°Q'`~~ ~~--,cue` PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~~~g7'ER'j,vy't, POS"f OFFICE BOX 4748, CI,FARVlATER~ FL,oRiDA 33758-4748 iai/ MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOU"1'H MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATI3R, FLORIDA 33756 TEI,EPL-IONS (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT I~L•:VIEW March 23, 2006 Mr. Brian Wilkes Burcaw & Associates 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue Suite A Tampa, FL 33625 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-11089 at 211 Ewing Avenue Dear Mr. Wilkes: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On August 4, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 24-unit townhome community in the Downtown Town ,Lake Residential Character District, per Section 2-902.C. The DRC APPROVED the application based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law with the following conditions of approval: Findings of Fact/Conclusions of Law: 1. The subject 1.033-acre site is zoned Downtown Town Lake Residential Character District; 2. The proposal complies with Attached Dwelling criteria under the provisions of Section 2-902.C; 3. The proposal complies with requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 4. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; 5. The proposal will conform to the Downtown Design Guidelines; 6. Flexibility in regard to use are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel; and 8. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, the landscape plan and plant material schedule be revised to make the plant quantities consistent; 2. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first; PrnNli Husisn;a), MAYOR I3u.;. )(>nsoN, VicE:-MnvoR )ouN I)ow~n. Conncu ~u~:>u;;tK I-IOrr Hnav;:roN, Ccx;nc:nMrtM;+rR ® Cn;ei.EN A. I'I•°I'I:RSI?N, Cc x;n(:u_~n:~uS;iR "EQUAL. TSMPLOYMIiN"I' ANI) AI'I'IRMA'I'IVIi AC'CION I:DIPLOYI?R" March 23, 2006 s ~ FLS2005-11089 ' Page 2 3. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, a double detector check valve with bypass meter shall be required for any internal fire protection line; 4. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, Crushed concrete shall be utilized instead of crushed rock for base under architectural paver walkways; 5. The City of Clearwater will provide water taps; set the water meters and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees, prior to the issuance of any site or building permit; 6. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, Doghouse manhole shall be set on either a pre- cast or poured in place concrete slab; 7. Obtain permit for all work in City rights-of--way prior to the issuance of any site or building permit; 8. Final payment for buy-in to Downtown Stormwater Service District is required prior to the issuance of a building permit; 9. Provide an additional type C grate inlet on the private road that connects MLK to Ewing. This is to accommodate the amount of runoff generated in a 10 year storm on a road with a 2% grade; 10. The storm pipe proposed on Ewing Ave is to be 18" RCP to accommodate post-development; 11. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit prior to the issuance of a site or building permit; 12. Provide a screen around both the electric transformers to make them less obtrusive, but not inaccessible (fence, wall, and/or landscaping); 13. Mechanical and utilities equipment that are placed at grade must be placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of--ways with fences, walls, and/or landscaping; 14. The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC; 15. The final design of the site and landscape plan be consistent with the plans submitted to the DRC; and 16. All signage be consistent to the design/colors submitted and comply with the requirements of the signage portion of the Community Development Code and Downtown Design Guidelines. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with above conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the application dated received November 2, 2005 and revised site plans and building elevations dated received March 8, 200. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (March 23, 2007}. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years, of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. An extension of time maybe granted by the Community Development Coordinator for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Coordinator may approve an additional extension of time not to exceed one year for good cause shown and documented in writing. The coordinator must receive the request for this extension within the one-year period of validity after the original time extension. The Community Development Coordinator may approve an additional extension of time not S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Vnactive or Finished CaseslEwing 111 Ewing Street Townhomes (D) - ApprovedlFLS2005-11089 Development Order.doc March 23, 2006 FLS2005-11089 Page 3 to exceed on year for good cause shown and documented in writing. The coordinator must receive the request for this extension within the one-year period of the validity after the original extension. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that maybe required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner II at 727-562-4547. Sincerely, ..., s.~ _,r_.. ' ~;ysi," Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director S.•IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslEwing 211 Ewing Street Townhomes (D) - ApprovedlFLS2005-11089 Development Order.doc Tr~smission Report Date/Time 3-23-06; 3: 19PM Local ID 7275624796 LOCaI Name Company Logo This dorcument was conf i rmecf. (.reduced samele and Retails below) Document Size Letter-S ,~o,e, -,tl, - 'r ~~' CITY OF CZEARWATER ,~,..,y~.. ,_- ---_ ~ ~ ` ~ PIAPII4ING DPPART'MENC :~"- C ~ Parr OF~v Boz 4748, Gxwvxmy Pcadox 33758-4748 '^~~~~ Tnx~v. Saaerss Bannaa;, lOD Sam, Mncnr AVnvui[,GaumrATRA~PWamn 39n6 lf~mfota p27) 562.1567 P.~r (727) 562-4865 ImAO Au,m AANIQMG PemOnnrrtffinn lHatCh 23, 2006 lYl4 l3riaa R Ilkq ]3ncraw ~ Aeaocietea 6402 W. f.>aebaugh Avemta State A Tampa, PL 33625 R& DavdopmeutOiderre~mdmgameFIS200S11089at2L1flwiogAeenue Ilea Mr. ~Yillms This letter comstitntw s Devdopmmt Older pwsuant m Section 4202E of the Gommmity Development Coda Om Augtait 4.2005, the Devatapmar Review Comrnidee SRC) revicwod yaQ appllutiom for 17avbie S~ndmd Developmem approval m oomsnuel a 24-tmit mrvnhome camamvity is the Downtown Town f.aloe Readmtial Character District, pet Sxtian 2A02C. The 17RC AYP&OVEDtheapplicaconbeaednponthefoLowingflndtngsoffictattticonc[atimneflawwiththe followivg oondidoas of appmvaL• FLmdkges ofpacNCamclusiona of Lw: 1. Tha wbjed L033.acte ate is anted I)owamwn Town lace ]teddmtial ChmaclerDiatack 2. The puoposel comptlw with Attaehcd IhveIting criteriamlder the provlslo>m of Sxtioa 2-9020; 3. The pmposel corgrliea with req~emmta ofthe Cleanwte•Db»ntownRedaNdapnm~Plm; 4. The plan complies with Omenl Applicability Chitede tinder the ptoviaiotn of Section 3-913; S. The pmposai wtTl conform m the Downown Deagn (3aidelimer, 6. Flexibilityvtregard muse am juati6ed by the lteneRts to commmaty character earl the immafiate vicinity of the pamd pmposod for development smd tl» City of Clearvratc ae a wholy 7. Theo ate no activeeode eofmotrnmt catee for the pared; and 8. Theprapoaed deveh>pmeat is aompeflble with me emmmrding area. S~ltloas of Anamvel: t. Prior to the issv®oe of aA' ate or bmTdrog permit, the Iatul6cape plan and plant matmal xLe3ile be reWa~ to make the plant goantitiw conasteak 2 Opca epacehtxreaem impact few are dire puler m isatrame of butTderg pr+rnim ~ final pbt pf applicable) wMehsver oxmn (-ask FMM 4IIIaNe1~ alnnn 19uJm~. ViCFfMM1a fua' IH,®Y4 GeWPJlmaa HIJYt MUmIrttGUw:¢vdA1 ® l:nenXA RRRt'rti Gaxmuvm "FkltN Wfn~wnnwr.rxn.la Tw!A~mti~F.Mntmta' Total Pages Scanned - 3 Total Pages Confirmed 3 No. Doc Remote Station Start Ttme Du rat ion Pages Mode Comments Results 1 153 98138823808 3-23-06; 3: 18PM 54" 3/ 3 EC CP 26.4 Notes EC: Error Correct RE: Resend PD: Pot led by Remote MB: Receive to Mailbox BC: Broadcast Send MP: Multi-Poll PG: Polling a Remote PI: Polder Interruption CP: Completed RM: Receive t0 Memory DR: Documen t Removed TM: Terminated by user HS: Host Scan HP: Host Print FO: Forced Output WT: Waiting Transfer HF: Host Fax HR: Host Receive FM: Forward Mal ibex Doc. WS: Waiting Send Transmission Report Date/Time Local ID Local Name Company Logo This document Was confirmed. (reduced sample and details below) Document Size Letter-S `~~,~~ ~_ ; CITY OF CI,EARWATER ~ ~_ i ':.-:: ~. -...+~~. ~ I P[ANNING DEPARTMFM' Pon O.>rm Bac 4748, Gr.~avnay I'wmw 3375&4748 ~~F '% MaxasK Snvas avtuznc, loo Sovrt~MxmaAvews, Qraa~icrta, [4o+mn33756 iLU~r,6oan (7E7) 46245e7 Pnx (7t7) 36L4e63 Inxo R~saa Purxm+c I)evnnraari ]Loran Merck 23, 2W6 Mt )~ Rrilkes Bmcawb` Aesoeia0cs 6462 W. fiaebaugb Avetme Spite A Tamps, PL 33624 RE: Devdopa~OrderregaF~ngwseFLS2005-11089d211SwingAvnoue Dear 1Mr. Willrea: Thin letter cvm<titdea a Development Order pvrae~ m Section 4202E of the Community Davdopmw# Code. On August 4, 2006. the Development Renew Committee (DRC) reviewed yvav applkation fx Fleatble Sm¢detd Development appmvnl b wavhaet s 24-mrit townbama eommuaity in the Downtown Town I~ka Reddmtid Chetacrer Diatrid, per Sec6oe 2A02.C. The DRC APPROVED the epplieatim based uPen the following findings of fid and conchtdoos of laagwith the following owdititrm of approval: rmmtt®ot racucancFOeta~ or taw• 1. Tho subjaot 1.033-seen site is coned Downtown Tows Lako Residmtid Cbmacter Diatriet 2 The proposal compHea arith Attached Dwelling nit®a undo t~ psovisiom of Sectien 2-962.C; 3. The pmpoml oampfiea with n~gmmmatb ofibe QranvaroDoFVnlmFn RrdawlopmearPlms; 4. Thu plan complies with Gwwd App]icaM7ity Criteria under the pmviodaas ofSectioo 3-917; 5. The pnopobgl vvlII eonfaffi to the Downtown Deeigs Ouide~wt; 6. Pladbi&ty m regard to nse ao jnatified by the be~fifa to eemm®ty character avd the immediate vidtrityoftitepmcelpmpoacdfordevelopoaemetdthoCltyofClearwa[ceaawholq 7. Thee ammo ectivo node enforcement cases for the parcel; end 8. 'Iha proposed development is oompm'bb with the sunotmding area. Coadiaons of AtromvaL• I. Prior m the issuance of mry sib or buildoog pemut, the leadaeepo plan and plant malarial aebedule be revisod to make the plain tpmntities consiattent: 2. Open spacehccrcation imp~t Ekes aro dm prior m issuance of bmlding permits m final plat pf eppllmble) whichever occurs first ve,s. Hswimf, w,na miyxRUV, ~hx~M.nv Jv~• o,mw. Cmnaawmm~ Hwr HUwrun, Gxe~.rRenn ~ ® UovrA »naewn, Gna~mv9ov "!3~ Yxrurnawr nrvn Aemww.ma ALTna Fimnmr' Total Pages Scanned 3 Total Pages Confirmed 3 3-23-06; 3:20PM 7275624796 No_ Doc Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Mode Comments Results 1 155 95019694 3-23-06; 3: 19PM 56^ 3/ 3 EC CP 24.0 Notes EC: Error Correct RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote MB: Receive to Mailbox BC: Broadcast Send MP: Multi-Poll PG: Polling a Remote PI: Polder Interruption CP: Completed RM: Receive t0 Memory DR: Documen t Removed TM: Terminated by user HS: Host Scan HP: Host Print FO: Forced Output WT: Welting Transfer HF: Host Fax HR: Host Receive FM: Forward Mailbox Doc. WS: Wal tang Send ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~-~C~~ ,~ 1 ~AP~ 0 S 2006 and associates, inc. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The Client's Engineering Solution. An Employee Owned Company. March 8, 2006 ,John Schodtler, Planner I City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: EIa Townhomes FLS2005-1 l 089 - 211 Ewing Avenue Response to Comments Dear Mr. Schodtler: Please find attached five (5) sets of revised construction plans, five (5) sets of revised architectural drawings, as well as five (S) copies of these responses. FIRE CONDITION: It is requested that any further issues or concerns with the Fire Review be a condition of Flexible Standards to be addressed during Building Permit review. This is the third submittal of plans for this project that have clearly addressed all Fire comments. It is requested that the Fire reviewer make sure that the latest set of plans are provided to him by the Planning Department. Page 4 #1 5 Change NFPA 13 to NFPA 1 3R and add the comment "each unit to have it's own riser, control valves and water flow bell. Response: Please note that these Fire Condition comments were all addressed by our previous submittal. The previously provided plans and responses clearly address Fire comments l - 6. 2. Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due. Response: Please note that these Fire Condition comments were all addressed by our previous submittal. The previously provided plans and responses clearly address Fire comments 1 - 6. 3. Page 6 Show a fire hydrant at the Martin Luther King jr. entry points that is on the same side of street as project. Response: Please note that these Fire Condition comments were all addressed by our previous submittal. The previously provided plans and responses clearly address Fire comments 1 - 6, 6402 West Linebaugh Avenue • Suite A • Tampa, Florida 33825 Tel 81 8.882.48'1 5 Fax 8'18.882.3808 www.burcawinc.com ORIGINAL RECEIVED Mr. john Schodtler MAC 0 F3 2006 March 8, 2006 Page 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4. Page S Show paver sidewalk details specifying that they will withstand the 80,000 Ib weight of fire apparatus. Response: Please note that these Fire Condition comments were all addressed by our previous submittal. The previously provided plans and responses clearly address Fire comments l - 6. 5. Page 4 #13 Change listed codes to the current codes. Response: Please note that these Fire Condition comments were all addressed by our previous submittal. The previously provided plans and responses clearly address Fire comments 1 - 6. 6. A separate fire underground permit is required to be pulled by a Class 1, 2 or 5 licensed contractor. Add note to plan. Response: please note that these Fire Condition comments were a!I addressed by our previous submittal. The previously provided plans and responses clearly address Fire comments 1 - 6. LANDSCAPE CURBING CONDITION: ] . Provide the note fisted below to either page IS] or LS2. Per Section 3-1204.D., all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Response: The requested note has been added to Sheet LS-1. 2. Revisions submitted did not include quantities for the ground cover. Therefore this condition has not been met. Revise landscape plan to include the quantities. Response: The ground cover quantities have been included in the revised construction plans. Please refer to Sheet LS- t . PARKS & RECS CONDITION: 1. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4$24 to calculate the assessment. Site data table needs to be corrected to show number and type of existing units, number of proposed units and gross square footage of property. Response: This comment is acknowledged. Site data tables were updated as requested in our previous submittal. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONDFTION: ] . Revise the architectural site plan to show Ewing St. on the West and Ml_K on the East. Response: Please refer to revised architectural documents. • ORIGINAL REGEIV'ED Mr. John Schodtler March 8, 2006 ~~~ ;~ n Z~~~ Page 3 pt.ANM ~G DEp~gWA ERA 2. The civil and architectural plan do not match i.e. sidewalk width, and drive~~i'~d~~t~. Response; Please refer to revised civil and architectural plans. The plans have been coordinated to eliminate discrepancies. If any further contradictions happen to be discovered, these can be handled during Building Permit review. 3. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the individual driveways on the landscape site plan. Response: Please refer to previous response to this comment. In multiple past projects, the City established a precedent that the 20x20 triangles were unnecessary at each individual driveway. Atypical vehicle is shown with typical visibility lines. This figure shows that a vehicle can back out of the garage to clearly see oncoming traffic in both directions without the rear of the car overhanging the street. This street is a private, internal accessway with low speed and very limited potential traffic. Please contact me directly at (8 i 3) 882-481 S to discuss this issue if the City has further concerns. ZONING CONDITION: 1. The revised bui{ding elevations still lack a distinct base, middle, and cap on the side (north & south) elevations facing the adjacent properties. Therefore, the issue remains outstanding; staff recommends adding features similar to the elevations facing the private street as they provide the required base, middle and cap. (major architectural treatments on the principle building facade are to be continued around all sides of the building that are visible from the public realm.) Response; Please refer to architectural response. 2. The Downtown design guidelines require buildings to have a distinct base, middle, and cap. Some of the unit designs appear to lack these elements. Response: Please refer to architectural response. 3. The rear building elevations (north and south) are too bland; they need additional. Response: Please refer to architectural response. 4. Development Order condition: Provide a screen around both the elec transformers to make them less obtrusive, but not unaccessible (fence, wall, and/or landscaping). Response: This has been addressed on the civil plans, and is accepted as a Development prder condition. 5. This comment was not addressed on the resubmittal. Therefore the issue remains outstanding; Clarify two notes located on Civil sheet 4 that state °5' CMU Wall" along Ewing and MLK, not the notes stating 30" CMU wall. Response: Please refer to revised civil plans. This miscellaneous note has been removed from the plans. • • Mr. ,John Schodtler March 8, 2006 Page 4 6. The architectural floor plan and building elevations for unit "D" do not match, see the proposed windows in the ground floor foyer. Revise building elevations. r~~ `~~" Response: Please refer to architectnral response. 7. Provide a written response to how the following Downtown Design Guideline criteria is being accomplished: When located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment is to be integrated into the design of the building through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. Response: Please refer to architectural response. 8. Development Order condition: Mechanical and utilities equipment that is place at grade must be placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-ways with fences, walls, andJor landscaping. Response: This has been regaired on the civil plans in the form of a note, and is accepted as a Development Order condition. Thank you for your time in the review of this material. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call, Sincerely, ORIGINAL '` RECEIVED ~/~ ~6~ MArZ 0 8 2006 Brian Wilkes Project Manager PLANNING DEPARTMENT BW/lam CITY OF CLEARWATER Enclosures cc: File 05747PR Raymond Nolan f:\Projects\Engineering\05747\Correspondence\Design & Permitting\Cleanvater\Response letter 03-08-06.doc • ORIGINAL RFCF~>,/FD MA~d a ~ 20~~ 23 February 2006 DRC Review Comments PLANNING DI:FARTIiIIENT Clearwater, Florida CITY OF CLEARVJATER Re: DRC REVIEW- Case Number: FLS2005-1 1089 - 211 Ewing Ave Dear Sir, We are pleased to address your permit comments on the Ewing Street Townhouses located in Clearwater, Florida. Within the following paragraphs, please find responses to the comments. AGENCY NAME: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONDITION Comment #3: Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the individual driveways on the landscape site. plan. Response: See revised elevation on page 7. AGENCY NAME: ZONING CONDITION Comment #1: The revised building elevations still lack a distinct base, middle, and cap on the side (north & south) elevations facing the adJacent properties. Therefore, the issue remains outstanding; staff recommends adding features similar to the elevations facing the private street as they provide the required base. middle, and cap. (major architectural treatments on the principle building facade are to be continued around all sides of the building that are visible from the public realm.) Response: See revised elevation on page 7. Comment #2: The Downtown design guidelines require buildings to have a distinct base, middle, and cap. Some of the unit designs appear to lack these elements. Principals Response: See revised elevation on page 7. rob Glisson, AIA johnSaldana, NCARB Comment #3: The rear building elevations (north and south) are too bland; Jonathan Moore, NCARB they need additional details. rojo Architecture @NetPark Response: See revised elevation on page 7. 5701 E. Hillsborough Ave. Ste 1130 Tampa, FL 33610 Comment #4: Development Order Condition: Provide a screen around both AAOOOZe52 the electric transformers to make them less obtrusive, but not unaccessible (P)813.630.5508 (fence, WQII, and/or landscaping). (F) 813.630.5518 rojoarchitecture.com Response: Civil Englnner to address. Comment #5: This comment was not addressed on the resubmittal. Therefore the Issue remains outstanding; Clarify two notes located on Civil sheet 4 that state "5' CMU Wall" along Ewing and MLK, not the notes stating 30" CMU wall. Response: Civil Englnner to address. Comment #6: The architectural floor plan &bullding elevatlons for unit "D" do not match, see the proposed windows in the ground floor foyer. Revise bullding elevatlons. Response: Windows have been added to elevations, see revised page 7. Comment #7: Provide a written response to how the following Downtown Design Guideline criteria Is being accomplished: When located on the roof of a bullding, mechanical equlpment Is to be Integrated Into the design of the bullding trhough the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. Response: When located on the roof of a building, mechanical equlpment is to be Integrated Into the design of the bullding through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. Note has been added to revised elevation on page 7. Comment #8: Development Order Condition: Mechanical and utilities equlpment that Is placed at grade must be piacxed In the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent propeortles and rights-of- ways with fences, walls, and/or landscaping. Response: Civil Englnner to address. Once again, if any further clarification is required, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, Carlos Molnar, Project Manager rojo Architecture cc: file ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 0 8 200& PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF GLEARtrJATI=-? 6 LL ~~ ~~~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT °~6 earwater MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM December 22, 2005 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 211 EWING AVE (FLS2005-11089) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 211 EWING AVE, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 24 unit townhome community in the Downtown Town Lake Residential Character District, per Section 2-902.C.. On January O5, 2006, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be January O5, 2006. The City encourages. you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-562-4547 or John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files andlor submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on January O5, 2006. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner I u ;. ~_ ~~ JAN 3 t 2006 :_.,..,=~ i _r PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Letter of Notification - FLS2005-11089 - 211 EWING AVE S `~ _.~ 1 '~ •,~""ark:. CITY OF CLEARWATER ~., ~""`~ 4"~1,"'~~'~~ qs' ~Q; PLANNQVG DEPARTMENT `= J ~, _ ~ . .,1YgTES;Evg'• Pose Or~cE Box 4748 ,~,~ •v, ,-,; • ~-~. - -- ~~-,,~;U r• _ ~~~ ~ s r = ~ .~ -~ ;.2; ~ !~ ~"•. ~. i •_'f`•.:'~ eryt •_.:-- F's~ ,~ ~,;, 1~~3-3 L.d _•t., ~ .f" _ as tw.~. ~ i V1,F,ARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 ~ ~ ~ ~QMErEFt ~: ~ I11B411 U. S. POSTAtiEi':*R. CICERO, VICTOR S CICERO, CAROL A . 40S S 1VIARTIN L KING AVE CLEARyVATER FL 33756 -- 57Z ~ `=? ~== ~.~,-t .;..:,~;....r~.~ ~~ ~~ !~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ tl ~ ~ it t •„~,-' ,~/ '1i~' ^'1'u 1.1~ 111 I '111 f 1' 1 /1 11. !F I1F I' 11 IF. 111t~~~ ~ ' i .. ! ''~~~s'~-A Conditions Associated Wit i ;' ~''~~~ FLS2005-11089 ~~ 4 =~~~~~i~ ~~ 211 EWING AVE ~~ng ~~y •` ~~is~~ Fire Condition Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3062 11/27/2005 Page 4 #15 Change NFPA 13 to NFPA 13R and add the comment"each unit to have it's own riser, Not Met control valves and water flow bell. PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN 11/27/2005 Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an Not Met adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO DO. 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN 11/27/2005 Page 6 Show a fire hydrant at the Martin Luther King Jr entry pointy that is on the same side of Not Met street as project. PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN 11/27/2005 Page 5 Show paver sidewalk details specifying that they will withstand the 80,000 Ib weight of fire Not Met apparatus. PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN 11/27/2005 Page 4 #13 change listed codes to the current codes. Not Met 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN 11/27/2005 A seperate fire underground permit is required to be pulled by a Class 1, 2 or 5 licensed Not Met contractor. Add note to plan PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN Landscape Cu rbing Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 12/27/2005 Provide the note listed below to either page LS1 or LS2. Not Met 12/27/05 Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 12/27/2005 Revisions submitted did not include quantities for the ground cover. Therefore this condition has Not Met not been met. Revise landscape plan to include the quantities. 12/27/05 Revise tree and landscape legends to include the "quantities" Parks 8 Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 12/16/2005 Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if Not Met applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Site data table needs to be corrected to show number and type of existing units, number of proposed units and gross square footage of property. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 12/16/2005 Revise the architectural site plan to show Ewing St. on the West and MLK on the East. 1/25/06 - Not Met MET 2. The civil and architectural plan do not match i.e. sidewalk width, and driveway depth. 1/25/06 - MET 3. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the individual driveways on the landscape site plan. Print Date: 01/27/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 2 s. FLS2005-11089 211 EWING AVE Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 1/25/06 -NOT MET 4. All individual driveways must be a minimum of 19' from face of garage to back edge of sidewalk to prevent a vehicle from overlapping sidewalk blocking pedestrian pathway and/or road. 1/25/06 - MET All of the above to be addressed prior to DO. General note(s): A. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. B. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 12/22/2005 The revised building elevations still lack a distinct base, middle, and cap on the side (north & Not Met south) elevations facing the adjacent properties. Therefore, the issue remains outstanding; staff recommends adding features similar to the elevations facing the private street as they provide the required base, middle, and cap. (major architectural treatments on the principle building facade are to be continued around all sides of the building that are visible from the public realm.) 12/22/05 The Downtown design guidelines require buildings to have a distinct base, middle, and cap. Some of the unit designs appear to lack these elements. 12/22/05 The rear building elevations (north and south) are too bland; they need additional details. 12/27/2005 Development Order Condition: Provide a screen around both the elec transformers to make them Not Met less obtrusive, but not unaccessible (fence, wall, and/or landscaping). 12/27/2005 This comment was not addressed on the resubmittal. Therefore the issue remains outstanding; Not Met Clarify two notes located on Civil sheet 4 that state "5' CMU Wall" along Ewing and MLK, not the notes stating 30" CMU wall. 12/27/05 Clarify two notes located on Civil sheet 4 that state "5' CMU Wall" along Ewing and MLK. 01/26/2006 The architectural floor plan & building elevations for unit "D" do not match, see the proposed Not Met windows in the ground floor foyer. Revise building elevations. 01/27/2006 Provide a written response to how the following Downtown Design Guideline criteria is being Not Met accomplished: When located on the roof of a building, mechanical equiptment is to be integrated into the design of the building through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements. 01/27/2006 Development Order Condition: Mechanical and utilities equipment that is placed at grade must be Not Met placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent propeorties and rights-of-ways with fences, walls, and/or landscaping. Print Date: 01/27/2006 CaseConditons Page 2 of 2 • and associates, inc. The Client's Engineering Solution. An Employee Owned Company~rr January 13, 2006 John Schodtler, Planner I City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: Ela Townhomes FLS2005-1 1089 - 21 1 Ewing Avenue Response to DRC Review Dear Mr. Schodtler, ---- ORIGINAL Please fmd attached five (5) sets of revised construction plans, five (5) sets of revised architectural drawings, and five (5) copies of revised Project Narrative, as well as five (5) copies of these responses. The following aze specific responses to the individual comments received at the January 5, 2006 DRC meeting: GENERAL ENGINEERING: 1. Connect proposed water mains to 12-inch water line on east side of Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue to eliminate permanent blow-off assembly and loop water system. RESPONSE: The proposed water main has been revised to connect to the 12" line on the east side of MLK Jr Avenue. 2. Provide sidewalk along frontage of Ewing Avenue in accordance with Community Development Code Section 3-1701. RESPONSE: The proposed sidewalk along Ewing Avenue has been eztended to span the entire frontage. The above shall be addressed prior to DO. All of the- following to be addressed prior to building permit. 1. A double detector check valve with bypass meter shall be required for any internal fire protection line. RESPONSE: A double detector check valve with bypass meter is provided for the internal fire protection line. 2. Crushed concrete shall be utilized instead of crushed rock for base under architectural paver walkway. 6402 West Linebaugh Avenue • Suite A • Tampa, Florida 38825 Tel 813.882.4815 Fax 818.882.3808 www.burcawinc.com • • ORIGINAL RECENED JAN 19 2Q06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RESPONSE: The proposed base for the paver walkway has been revised to crushed concrete instead of crushed rock. The plan sheet and detail have been revised accordingly. The City of Clearwater will provide water taps, set the water meters and B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. RESPONSE: It is acknowledged that the City will provide the above items. The applicant acknowledges responsiblilty for all fees. 4. Doghouse manhole shall be set on either a precast or poured in place concrete slab. RESPONSE: The doghouse manhole detail provided in the plans show a poured in place concrete slab as noted above. Thrust blocks are not permitted, use of mechanical restraints is required (Water Distribution Note #9). RESPONSE: The Water Distribution Note #9 has been revised to prohibit the use of thrust blocks, and require mechanical restraints. Obtain permit for all work in City rights-of--way. RESPONSE: Aright-of--way use permit will be obtained before any work in the City's right- of-way takes place. ENVIRONMENTAL: Application for buy-in to Downtown Stormwater Service District received. Note: Final payment required prior to building permit. RESPONSE: The Downtown Stormwater Service District application has been approved. Final payment will be made prior to building permit. FIRE: 1. Page 4 #15 Change NFPA 13R and add the comment "each unit to have it's own riser, control valves and water low bell". PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN. RESPONSE: The requested changes have been made. Provide Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations/Water Study due PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN. RESPONSE: These calculations will be provided by a fire protection engineer. Please note that this is a part of the City's detailed building review and has NEVER been required for • • ORIGINAL RECENED JAN 19 ZOQ6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Flexible Standards approval. It is requested that the City not change their practices, and require this as part of the building review as has been done in the past. 3. Page 6 Show a fire hydrant at the Martin Luther King Jr. entry pointy that is on the same side of street as project. PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN RESPONSE: A fire hydrant has been added at the MLK JR entry on the same side of the street as the project. 4. Page 5 Show paver sidewalk details specifying that they will withstand the 80,000 lb weight of fire apparatus. PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN. RESPONSE: The paver detail provided is a standard FDOT detail that is rated to withstand the requried load. This is the same detail that the City has approved many times already within the last year. 5. Page 4 #13 change listed codes to the current codes. 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN. RESPONSE: The listed codes have been revised to show current editions. 6. A separate fire underground permit is required to be pulled by a Class 1, 2 or 5 licensed contractor. Add note to plan PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN. RESPONSE: This comment has been added to the plans in the form of a note on Sheet 6. LANDSCAPING: 1. Revise general landscaping note #2 on page LS2 to indicate Florida Grade #1 instead of Nursery Grade # 1. RESPONSE: The note has been revise as requested. 2. Per Section 3-1204 D, all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. RESPONSE: The site has been designed with 6" protective curbing. ~~,,,p~3. Revise tree and landscape legends to include the "quantities". Y" " RESPONSE: The quantities have been added as requested. PARKS AND RECREATION: • ORIGINAL RECENED JAN 19 246 pLgNNING DEPARTWIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Site data table needs to be corrected to show number and type of existing units, number of proposed units and gross square footage of property. RESPONSE: The site data table correctly shows the requested data. The open space/recreation fee appplication has been submitted to the Parks and Recreation Department. No response has been received as of yet. STORMWATER: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following conditions are to a met: 1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit to Development Services. 2) It is recommended that an additional type C grate inlet be constructed on the private road that connects MLK to Ewing. This is to accommodate the amount of runoff generated in a 10 year storm on a road with a 2% grade. 3) The storm pipe proposed on Ewing Ave. is to be 18"RCP to accommodate the postdevelopment site runoff and the adjacent road drainage. RESPONSE: A copy of the SWFWMD permit will be forwarded when received. An additional type C inlet has been added to the plans. The storm pipe proposed on Ewing Avenue is shown to be 18". The additional survey information needed to complete this off- site design has been added to the plans. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: 1. Revise the architectural site plan to show Ewing St. on the West and MLK 6n the East. RESPONSE: The site plan has been revised. 2. The civil and architectural plan do not match i.e. sidewalk width, and driveway depth. RESPONSE: All inconsistencies have been corrected. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the individual driveways on the landscape site plan. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). RESPONSE: 20'z20' sight visibilty triangles are shown at both entrances/exits. As previously established with the City, the requirement for these 20'x20' triangles at each individual driveway on a private, low speed, internal accessway is not needed. As has been done on all previous projects in the area, we have included a typical vehicle size with visibility lines establishing that a driver's vision is not impeded while his vehicle is still fully in the driveway. All individual driveways must be a minimum of 19' from face of garage to back edge of sidewalk to prevent a vehicle from overlapping sidewalk blocking pedestrian pathway and/or road. • ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 19 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CIEARWATER RESPONSE: The site plan has been revised to include 19' driveways from face of garage to back edge of sidewalk. This was accomplished by taking one foot out of the floorplan and shifting the southern building back one foot closer to the south property line. All of the above to be addressed prior to DO. General note(s): A. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Foc Ordinance and fee schedule. B. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. PLANNING: ~~ This comment is addressing a separate issue, the property owner has not appointed Burcaw & Assoc. as an approved agent. Number 3 needs to be revised to show Burcaw & Associates. c ~~ S Q~oq y 4. ok The Affidavit to Authorize Agent is authorizing the owner to represent themselves. Based on how the application has been filled out, should not Burcaw -Brian Wilkes be the agent. Clarify. RESPONSE: A new Affidavit to Authorize Agent will follow this resubmittal naming Burcaw as the Agent. The Downtown design guidelines require buildings to have a distinct base, middle, & cap. Some of the unit designs appear to lack these elements. RESPONSE: Each of the units has a distinct base, middle, and cap. We have accentuated different.elements throughout the site and at the end units to create a sense of heirarchy. This treatment of massing helps break a very long building into smaller pieces and lightens the length of the building. To further articulate the caps, we have thickened the cap of the lightest of the volumes to produce a more noticable element, but retain the heirarchy in rhythm. The rear building elevations (north and south) are too bland; they need additional details. RESPONSE: We have incorporated the barrel the canopy from the front of the building with the rear doors. We have modified the colors of the back to respond with the rhythm of the front. We have also pulled more score lines from the front to break up the volumes. On the front building elevations explain why the base blocks are different heights. RESPONSE: The difference between the base heights of the corner units and the interior unit is done to create more street presence. We furthered the concept by incorporating a stone material at the corner unit base. Staff would like to see the roof details of the plain roof structures enhanced with an appropriate architectural feature of some sort. i ORIGINAL RECENED JAN 19 20Q~6 PIANNING DEPARTMENT C1TY OF CIEARWAtER RESPONSE: We have rovided additional details of the differ n r f ~ p e t oo conditions on page 8 of our submittal. With regards to the enhacement of some of the plain roof details, we have increased the width of the banding element at the parapet wall. We feel that further ornamentation of this element will detract from the rhythm and heirarchy the project establishes. v~ The fences along the north and south property lines indicate 8" PVC, but the note at the top of the page indicates "proposed 6' (max) -Six foot is the maximum height -see Civil Site Plan pg. 4. RESPONSE: The fence is to be 6'-0" high. The architectural plans have been modified to be consistent with this. Explain why the windows on the second floor ,front building elevation for the corner units are smaller than the. rest on the second floor. See page 7 of the architects building plans. (the upper building elevations, first set of windows on the second floor from the right.) RESPONSE: The windows on the second floor are smaller in height due to the functions of the rooms they are in. For instance, in the kitchens and bathrooms, the window is coordinated with the interior millwork. We have created a rhythm of these smaller apertures across the facade of the building for some consistency. ~A sidewalk along Ewing Street needs to be provided to maintain an urban and pedestrian friendly environment. RESPONSE: The proposed sidewalk along Ewing Avenue has been extended to span the entire frontage of Ewing Avenue. 9. screen e e ers o m e em less obtrusive, but not i unaccessible (fence, wall, and/or landscaping). ~~p ~flt l l~ ~ RESPONSE: Landscaping will be used to screen the transformers. ~- Architectural site plan and civil site an o match with regards to unit Type D's ~, front porch, front door, and sidewalk locations. G~ • ~~ ~ RESPONSE: The civil drawings and architectural plans have been coordinated to match. ,P " p0 ~ ~ ~-s~l 11. What is the structure located directly south of the proposed transformer along Ewing Avenue. RESPONSE: There are a couple of structures in that area. One is an existing utility pole. A proposed double detector check valve assembly is also located directly south of the proposed transformer. A fu•e hydrant is also proposed in this area. Nom- 12. Clarify two notes located on Civil sheet 4 that state "5' CMU Wall" along Ewing and MLK. ~_ ~'~'~S~D RESPONSE: The two labels read "30-inch CMLI Wall" and are included as an architetural feature to separate the end units from the adjacent streets. ORIGINAL RECENED JAN 19 2066 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Note on plans that walls facing street rights of ways will be painted/fmished to match the architectural style of the buildings. `~? / RESPONSE: The requested note has been added. • +15 Revise the second sentence of the second paragraph of the project description. The proposed townhome community is a Level One Flexible Standard use, not a Permitted use. RESPONSE: The requested change has been made. ~' Revise or remove the last paragraph of the project description. Town Lake Residential District Policies do apply to the proposed project. RESPONSE: As established in previous projects, the Project Narrative covers the Downtown Redevelopment Plan section by section. The section of the Plan titled "Town Lake Residential District Policies" (Policies 1- 7, pages 70 -71) refer to proposed commercial uses in this District, and thus do not apply to this project. ~Y7` Clarify. How is the proposed use in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of ADJACENT properties? Reply to each separately as the project narrative did not address. RESPONSE: The proposed development does not match the. scale, bulk, coverage, and density of the existing adjacent properties, but mimics that set forth by the City's visions/goals of the area in the Redevelopment Guidelines. The character of this project compliments that of the park area to the west, with an upscale, clean look. The scale, bulk, coverage, and density are not currently in harmony with the adjacent properties because these properties for the most part contain underutilized land, and this project is the first redevelopment project in this block. The scale, bulk, coverage, and density do adhere to the City's Code and Redevelopment Guidelines, however. The revised plans, in combination with these responses, should provide assurance that the City's intentions will be met by this project. It is requested that the City approve this request for Flexible Standards Development, and if there are any outstanding issues that they be included as Conditions of Approval to be addressed prior to Building Permits. If you have any questions or need further information please call me at 813-882-4815 ext. 248. Sincerely, Burcaw & Associates, Inc. t Brian Wilkes, EI Project Manager Cc: File 05747 Raymond Nolan ~ • t, ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 19 2006. f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V /~ DEPAIZSn/IENi t~ p~NNING WATER C1N OF CLEAR , CITY OF CLEARWATER PROJECT NARRATIVE Ela Townhomes Clearwater, Florida Prepared for: Ewing Development LLP 2840 West'Bay Drive, #279 Belleair Bluffs, Florida 33770 Prepared by: u -~ ~~ , & Associates, Inca Engineers • Serveyors • Planners • Environmental Scientists • • Commercial Real Estate • Burcaw & Associates, Inc. 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue -Suite A Tampa, Florida 33625 November 2005 Burcaw Project No. 05747 Project Description The project consists of a 24-unit townhome community on 1.033 acres in the Downtown District, between Ewing Avenue and MLK Avenue just south of Pierce Street. The allowable density on this site is 30 units per acre. The project is located in the City of Clearwater designated Downtown District, in the Town Lake Residential District. The proposed townhome community is a Level One Flexible Standard Use in this district. The following addresses the Flexible Standard Development criteria for attached dwellings in the Downtown District: Height: The City of Clearwater Community Development Code (Code) allows for a maximum height of 30-50 feet in the Downtown District. The proposed project would have a maximum height of 35 feet. Street Frontage: The townhome community is designed to have an outward appearance to the adjacent Ewing Avenue and MLK Avenue. Driveways and garages would face the internal, private road. However, a sidewalk will connect Ewing Avenue to MLK Avenue to suggest the feel of an urban street environment, with the end units having stoops, doors, and windows facing the City streets. Off-Street Parking: The Code requires a minimum 1 - 1 Ih parking spaces per unit, or 24 - 36 spaces for the development. The proposed project offers two (2) parking spaces per building, or 48 spaces. Design Cruideline Compliance: The following Downtown Redevelopment Plan narrative insures that the Downtown District Design Guidelines are being met. In addition, no metal fabricated buildings are proposed for this site, per Code. Downtown Redevelopment Plan Ela Townhomes will fulfill the Vision of the Downtown Plan by providing the needed residential component to the Downtown area. The townhome units are designed to be aesthetically pleasing from an architectural and landscaping standpoint. The townhome community, with its upscale image, will attract people to live within the Downtown area, promoting more shopping, employment, and recreation to take place there. Variety in housing types will also be satisfied, as few upscale townhome communities currently exist within surrounding area. ORIGINAL RECENED JAN 19 2Q~6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i r .v Ela Townhomes promotes a safe environment for the future residents and Downtown as a whole. Access is achieved via a 24' private road which connects Ewing Avenue to MLK Jr Avenue. Driveways are accessed via the internal private road. Sidewalks are also provided in the community, and along the adjacent City streets. The Downtown Redevelopment Plan Visions, Goals, and Policies are accounted for and encouraged by the proposed development. Ela Townhomes will promote new residents, and the safety of those residents, and as outlined below, have been designed to preserve the character and vision of the Town Lake Residential District. Town-Lake Residential District Existing Character The proposed land use of this project will keep consistent with the existing residential portions of this district. Ela Townhomes would also make use of the Town Lake stormwater facility, and is within walking distance of the Town Lake Park. The Town Lake Residential District contains significant amount of underutilized land according to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, and this development converts just over an acre of the currently underutilized land into a 24-unit townhome community. District Vision Use: In keeping with the encouraged residential use, Ela Townhomes will provide 24 townhome units. Function: Ela Townhomes would add new residents in the Town Lake District that will enliven-Downtown and provide a market for new retail and restaurant development. The community is also located near the Town Lake Park, for residents enjoyment. Development Patterns: The proposed residential development is south of Cleveland Street. The property is within walking distance of Town Lake, and is architectually styled to face Ewing Avenue and MLK Jr Avenue. Prohibited Uses: The proposed project is not a prohibited use in this area. ORIGINAL RECENED JAN 19 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r Intensity: The proposed density is 23.3 units per acre, which is less than the 30 units per acre allowed per Downtown Guidelines. Height: The proposed maximum height will be 35', or less than half of the allowable 75'. Town Lake Residential District Policies The Town Lake Residential District Policies generally do not apply to the proposed Clearwater City Homes project, or the immediate area. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAiJ 19 2006 PLANNING DEPp,RTMEN~f CIN OF CLEARWATER r_ • ~ ~~c~w and associates, inc. The Client's Engineering Solution. An Employee Owned Company. November 9, 2005 Mr. John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: Ela Townhomes FLS2005-11089 - 211 Ewing Avenue Response to Letter of Incompleteness Mr. Schodtler: i2ECEIVED I~OV 10 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIT~OF Cl.EARWATER In response to your Letter of Incompleteness dated November 4, 2005, we offer the following responses to your comments: 1. Provide one set of building elevations with dimensions from existing grade to ultimate top of bubilding. Plans provide only indicate to finish roof. A set of building elevations with requested dimensions will be provided by the architect. 2. Provide estimated project value of entire development. The estimated project value is $5,000,000. 3. Provide one copy of colored building elevations and please include the color chips or swatches. These items will be provided by the architect. 4. Could not locate a Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist" as checked off on the FLS application. Please contact Arborist Rick Albee (727) 562-4741. A tree inventory prepared by a certified arborist is included in this submittal. Please note, however, that this inventory has not been required or questioned in any previous permitting experience with the City. The Affidavit to Authorize Agent is authorizing the owner to represent themselves. Based on how the application has been filled out, should not Burcaw -Brian Wilkes be the agent. Clarify. 6402 West Linebaugh Avenue • Suite A • Tampa, Florida 33625 Tel 8'13.882.48'1 5 Fax 81 3.882.3808 www.burcawinc.com i ~f • • At the last DRC meeting attended by Burcaw, we were instructed by John Schodtler to list Burcaw as Agent in order to receive comments and correspondence related to our permit application. We were also instructed to fill out the Affidavit as currently shown, since Burcaw will not be signing for the owner. The intent of the application is to show that Ray Nolan will represent Ewing Development LLP, and sign all owner/developer related documentation. Burcaw will be responsible for addressing all City concerns throughout the permitting process. If you have any questions or need additional information, please me at (813) 882-4815. Sincerely, BURCAW AND ASSOCIATES, INC. n `. . GllG~~ Brian S. Wilkes, E.I. Project Manager cc: Ewing Development LLP File 05747 PR ~~~~9~~~ Nav ~ ~ 205 PLp-NNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~~ and associates, inc. The Client's Engineering Solution. /.fin Employee Owne~f Comparyy. .. ~~~ ~~~~ Memo Gov ~ o zoa5 To: Andy Greenwood, PE From: Jim Gilman, RLA, IsA pLANNINGDEEP~R,R~TA EST Date: October 4, 2005 CAN ~~ ~ Re: 211 Ewing Avenue, Clearwater -Tree Evaluation I conducted an evaluation of existing trees at the above referenced site today. Trees are identified and numbered on the attached tree survey. My findings are summarized below: TREE #1: 8" Oak. Condition very poor. Die-back and chlorosis are advanced. TREE #2: 21" Oak. Condition fair. Extensive cross-branching, some die-back in canopy; TREE #3: 30" Oak. Condition fair. Extensive included bark between first major branch and trunk could pose a hazard to people and/or property. Canopy appears healthy. TREE #4: 27" Oak. Condition very poor. Extensive scarring, die-back, chlorosis, potential hollow/rotted trunk. TREE #5: 15"/12" Double Oak. Condition fair. Central trunk has died. Two remaining trunks are leaning north, with little canopy south of trunks. Likelihood of included bark, rot at attachment to dead third trunk. Potential hazard. TREE #6: 18" Oak. Condition poor. Poor form, cross-branching, unhealed branch scars, potential rot and/or hollow trunk. TREE #7: 28" Oak. Condition fair. Potential rot in trunk, potential hollow trunk, included bark. Canopy good although some chlorosis. TREE #8: 30" Oak. Condition fair. Included bark may indicate structural instability. TREE #9: 24" Oak. Condition fair. Leaning east, may indicate structural instability. Canopy form poor. TREE #10: 15" Sabal Palm. 12 ft. clear trunk. Condition good. TREE #11: 24" Oak. Condition very poor. Unhealed branch scars, evidence of trunk rot, canopy poor condition. Potential hazard. TREE #12: 15" Sabal Palm. 6 ft. clear trunk. Condition good. 6402 West Linebaugh Avenue, Suite A Tampa, Florida 83825 Tel 8'13.882.48'15 Fax 81 3.882.8808 ~Neb www.burcawinc.com ` f ` ~ TREE #13 15" Sabal Palm. 8 ft. clear trunk. Condition good. TREE #14 15" Sabal Palm. 9 ft. clear trunk. Condition good. Please contact me if you have questions or require additional information. NOV 1 Q 2005 pl.p-NNING DE~PR'RNTA ER T - CITY OF C • Page 2 AS-BUILT R T ^OA=S eC1iS 1' ~ d0' FCM 3'X3" ^ NE CORNER OF THE SOUTH 10.0' OF LOT 20 BLOCK B SURVEY ADDRESS: 211 EWING AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. AVENUE (F) RIM ELE. =J7.J1' ' CREENW000 AVENUE (P) S. INV. =78.79 N. INV. =78.76 SOUTH 149.65 (M) r{ ~t- - T- - y7) _ ~3~ 7 32'32 a6) 0.5'CONC CURB(° ~ 2) j 3 c,a) (x 1 ns) (x ~,?.6B3 90) 1 3 ~ x ~ ---E~~ 260.37'(M) 5'CSw z 31.9) 32.5) 5'CSw 4,0) Iz FlR i/2" + ~ J'D/A. METAL ~ ~ I FCM 3'X3" - x- X p ~ y Ur(CITY POLE ~ ~ J , , O N O ~3p 6 LOT 25 ° BLOCK B ~ ,~ o O o ~, ° o o ro 2) °j (X 32 = EXISTING ELEVATION ELEVATIONS ARE RELATIVE TO NAVD 1988. X30.2 x LOT 10 BLOCK B NOTE: THIS SURVEY REFLECTS ALL ~2g,3 EASEMENTS SHOWN AS EXCEPTIONS TITLE COMMITMENT NO.: C-05164599 WRITTEN BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY. EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/10/05. 4.0 ~2~.7 260. DO'(TM) N.00'17"33" ^. 255.32'(M) ~~'SS "~ I I o ~ , ~- I I O I I I i LOT 27 ~ ~I~ U BLOCK B ~ 21 'PALA?~ 31.81 ~x~ 32.0) UP•>< 32.9) X13 ° X~X~X~X~X~X~X~XI~X~X~X~X~~Y,~X~X~X~Xi X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~h ~ I d LLF LOT 26 BLOCK B ~ ; ~ x~ 31,4) ~ O ~i ~ d LOT 28 ° HLOCK B ~,,,, 2) ~ 30 J ~ 24 "OAK -~ I I ? 15'PALM j "m" ~ 1 ---------------- LOT 11 BLOCK B 0 `n ONE STORY MASONRY X211 48.1' 7 cov. ~I CONC. ~ i I i MONITORING WELL ~ ~ y X12 I ~x 32.2) I IX; 31.2) j I I I ~ ~ 24'OAK I I I ~~ I I 4) ~ 31 . 28'bAK ~%~ $~ ~ ~ #k7 ~ 30 "OAK I (~ p.8) `3 i `~~'C`i % \\~ ~18"OAK , ~ 15'%12 *`~f (0 ; v CLUSTER i 30.9) LOT 13 ~ ~~ ®27"OA11 BLOCK B LOT 12 BLOCK B I I ~B 4) ~ ' I " OAK ~ 30.3) x 2g.2) ~'~ I I 1 Ic I k ~ ~ ~ I i O V k I Lz 2g.a) X0,0) 21 "OAK x x-x- -~ x-x-~TOY2'~JT d ag.4) x- x- ~ Zl'PAL M ~ 34.5) LOT 29 z t BLOCK )T z ~ ~ " ~m nor 1z 33. t) a S~ --I 5 1 j-~ 1 1'7 -. ~ ~ o ~ ~- ° ~, ° ° ° o ° o " ~ 32.6) % • 3 h N _b o~ v 2 32.1) LOT 14 BLOCK B 31.2)' 3p.2) r28 j 6~- LB~/7240 V FlR 1/2„ +~~ ~ '~ ~ s~! ~+-{' 26 _- FC NW CORNER OF ~s~ Ad, ~`~' of ~ 3 ~6~8~ ?~,TSJ6J THE SOUTH 10.0' ~ ~~ J r ~s~ ~~~_ ~ OF LOT S BLOCK B ~S9 ~sR ?~2 ~B,T ,J EWING ~JA VEN UE 8J 2J N. 00'00'36' E. 150. 10'(M) 150.00'(D) Q IV Q C~i v7 NOTES: THIS SURVEY WAS MADE ON THE GROUND UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, FlEID WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 06-14-05. MIFIICH IS THE DATE OF Ti:E 5.1fiVEY. BASIS OF BEARINGS: WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GREEldIW000 AVENUE: ASSUMED N00'DO'00"E SEE REVERSE 9DE FOR OTHER NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND LEGEND. FLOOD INFORMATION: LEGAL: SECTION: 15 TOWNSHIP: 29S RANGE: 15E CERTIFIED TO ZONE: X LOTS 11,12. 13, 26, 27 tt Za, BLOCK B, COACHMAN HEIGHTS REPEAT, ~-~~ ~ NUMBER: 12103C0108G ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT ~~$~~~r'w'r BOOK 20, PACE 28 OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF PINEII.AS COUNTY, ~ ~ ~owsx awr ao~ m DATE: 9/3/03 FLORIDA. ~ ~,~ CERTIFICATION: SURVEY PROS, INC. TM° ruavEr ~ Nvr wr.o ~~ i-+¢ >l~1~ Aw OIIIOIW. 11Mem !GL OF A FI~IIOA !l/fYlY01! i WFiEA URVEY LICENSED BUSINESS No. 7252 142b GULF TO BAY BLVD. ROS, INC. CLE4RWATER, FLORIDA 3375b PH. (727) 449-9010 FAX (727) 449-9008 FIELD WVORK BY• TT DATE: 06-14-06 lieriawn u~i~: ~A~ PAOE / DRAWN BY: ~ DATE: Ofi-08-06 ~ _ 6 ` JOB # 05-0452 ~~ ~ uro ~raR Mrteo a 7~ ~( i Nov ~ o ~aa~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER .- • ~ z. i i ~ V' • ~'[~~~9~9[~D Nov ~ 0 2005 Pi.ANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CIEARWATER ~~ ~~C~~~~9[~D NOV 10 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 • NOV ~ d 205 PLANNING DEPARTMENT crTY OF CIEARWATER ~ ~~ ~~ ~] NOV 10 200 Pl.~-NNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF ClEARWATER ~ 5 ~ ~ ~~~ .- ~ ';~ ~~~~9~~~ NOV 10 2005 PLANNING l~EPARTMEtVT CITY OF Cl.EARWATER ,. • ~~C~~94DC~~ NQV ~ 0 -ZOOS PLANNING ~EPARTMENr CITY OF CLEA'RWATER ~~ ~. • "~ ~ ~ Q Z -~-~ Z ~ ^' J m ~ Y Y ~' L.y"~ ~~/ ~ ~ ~' `~ ~~~~o~~~ ~QV l 4 ZQQS pl.ANNINGDEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 'O n Z >. O T~ _~ a ~ ° ~a P.^., ~~ ~ `~ ~ Z ~ m ,: .~ ~:..:: .. ~~~ ~ ~~~~o~~~ NQ~ 10 2005 p~1NING DEPARTMENT G1T1f OF GLEARWATER ~ir~ ~3[~C~~~M[~D p~INING DEPARTMENT CI~'Y OF CIEARWATER ,~ .:.. ,~. ,~ ._ • ~ i ~15~~1I V IS~ PiOV 7 0 2005 PLAfVNINGDEPARTMENT CITYOFCLEARWATER 'y. 'r0 ~+/, ~ ~ V ~~ oZ ~~ r~ ~ 1_A U 1, 11 O /V ~ A {i 11l U Y Y~ /V ~ "~'' W 10.45 am Case Number: FLS2005-1108y -- 2l 1. EWING AVE Applicant Raymond Nolan 2840 West Bay Drive Bellair, Fl 33770 TELEPHONE: 501-9596, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Brian Wilkes 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, Fl 33625 TELEPHONE: 81.3.882.4815, FAX: 813.882.3808, E-MAIL: Multiple Email Listed Location: 1.03 acres located on the east side of Ewing Avenue approximately 300 feet north of Court Street. Atlas Page: 287A Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 24 unit townhome community in the Downtown Town Lake Residential Character District, per Section 2-902.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: ] . 1. Connect proposed water mains to 12-inch water line on east side of Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue to eliminate permanant blow-off assembly and loop water system. 2. Provide sidewalk along frontage of Ewing Avenue in accordance with Community Development Code Section 3-1701. The above shall be addressed prior to DO. All of the following to be addressed prior to building permit. 1. A double detector check valve with bypass meter shall be required for any internal fire protection line. 2. Crushed concrete shall be utilized instead of crushed rock for base under architectural paver walkway. 3. The City of Clearwater will provide water taps, set the water meters and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 4. Doghouse manhole shall be set on either a precast or poured in place concrete slab. 5. Thrust blocks are not permitted, use of mechanical restraints is required (Water Distribution Note # 9). 6. Obtain permit for all work in City rights=of--way. Note -Sheets 2, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 will be reviewed in detail at application for building permit. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. ~i ~ f ~ti S ~ rf/~ Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 5, 2006 -Page ] 7 •. i ' Environmental: 1 . Application for buy-into Downtown Stormwater Service District received. Note: Final payment required prior to building permit Fire: 1 . Page 4 #1 S Change NFPA 13 to NFPA 13R and add the comment"each unit to have it's own riser, control valves and water flow bell. PRIOR TO DO ]2/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN 2 . Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FLRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO DO. 12/].8/05 NOT ADDRESSED 1N REVISED PLAN 3 . Page 6 Show a fire hydrant at the Martin Luther King Jr entry pointr that is on the same side of street as project. PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED 1N REVISED PLAN 1_4 . Page 5 Show paver sidewalk details specifying that they will withstand the 80,000 lb weight of (~l. fire apparatus. PRIOR TO DO 12/1.8/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN 5 , Page 4 #13 change listed codes to the current codes. 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED 1N REVISED PLAN 6 . A seperate fire underground permit is required to be pulled by a Class 1, 2 or 5 licensed contractor. Add note to plan PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED 1N REVISED PLAN Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: 1 , Revise general landscaping note #2 on page LS2 to indicate Florida Grade #1 instead of Nursery Grade #1. 2 . Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. 3 , Revise tree and landscape legends to include the "quantities" Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Site data table needs to be corrected to show number and type of existing units, number of proposed units and gross square footage of property. Stormwater: 1 , Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following conditions are to be met: 1~ 1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit to Development Services. ~U '~ 2) It is recommended that an additional type C grate inlet be constructed on the private road that I' connects MLK to Ewing. This is to accommodate the amount of runoff generated in a 10 year ~~(~ storm on a road with a 2% grade. (~~~ '~ 3) The storm pipe proposed on Ewing Ave is to be 18"RCP to accommodate the r P~ postdevelopment site runoff and the adjacent road drainage. ~j~Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 5, 2006 -Page 18 Revise the architectural site plan to show Ewing St. on the West and MLK on the East. 2. The civil and architectural plan do not match i.e. sidewalk width, and driveway depth. 3. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the individual driveways on the landscape site plan. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 4. All individual driveways must be a minimum of 19' from face of garage to back edge of sidewalk to prevent a vehicle from overlapping sidewalk blocking pedestrian pathway and/or road. All of the above to be addressed prior to DO. General note(s):. A. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. B. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: l . The Downtown design guidelines require buildings to have a distinct base, middle, and cap. Some of the unit designs appear to lack these elements. 2 . The rear building elevations (north and south) are too bland; they need additional details. 3 . On the front building elevations explain why the base blocks are different heights. 4 . Staff would like to see the roof details of the plain roof structures enhanced with an appropriate architectural feature of some sort. 5 . The fences along the north and south property lines indicate 8' PVC, but the note at the top of the page indicates "proposed 6' (max)" -Six foot is the maximum height -see Civil Site Plan pg 4. 6 . Explain why the windows on the second floor, front building elevation for the corner units are smaller than. the rest on the second floor. See page 7 of the architects building plans. (the upper building elevations, first set of windows on the second floor from the right) 7 . A sidewalk along Ewing Street needs to be provided to maintain an urban and pedestrian friendly environment. 8 . Provide a screen around both the elec transformers to make them less obtrusive, but not unaccessible (fence, wall, and/or landscaping). 9 . Architectural site plan and civil site/landscape plans do not match with regards to unit Type D's front porch, front door, and sidewalk locations. 10 . What is the structure located directly south of the proposed transformer along Ewing Avenue. 1 l . Clarify two notes located on Civil sheet 4 that state "5' CMU Wall" along Ewing and MLK. 12 . Note on plans that walls facing street rights of ways will be painted/finished to match the architectural style of the buildings. 13 . 14 . Revise the second sentence of the second paragraph of the project description. The proposed townhome community is a Level One Flexible Standard use, not a Permitted use. 15 . Revise or remove the last paragraph of the project description. Town Lake Residential District Policies do apply to the proposed project. 16 . Clarify. How is the proposed use in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of ADJACENT properties? Reply to each seperately as the project narrative did not address. Other: No Comments Notes: ~% _ " " ~ ~ Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 5, 2006 -Page 19 j w • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562567 Fax (727) 562-4576 January 04, 2006 WILKES, BRIAN 6402 W. LINEBAUGH AVENUE SUITE A TAMPA FL 33625 RE: FLS2005-11089 LOCATED AT 211 EWING AVE - EWING STREET TOWNHOMES Dear BRIAN WILKES: The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee (PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLS2005-11089. These comments are generated early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting on January 5, 2006. Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that may be generated at the DRC meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting. If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582. Sincerely, 1~. John Schodtler Planner I Cc: File .,, • 10.45 am Case Number: FLS2005-1108.211 SWING AVE Applicant Raymond Nolan 2840 West Bay Drive Bellair, Fl 33770 TELEPHONE: 501-9596, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Brian Wilkes 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue Tampa, Fl 33625 TELEPHONE: 813.882.4815, FAX: 813.882.3808, E-MAIL: Multiple Email Listed Location: 1.03 acres located on the east side of Ewing Avenue approximately ??? feet north of Court Street. Atlas Page: 287A Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 24 unit townhome community in the Downtown Town Lake Residential Character District, per Section 2-902.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Connect proposed water mains to l2-inch water line on east side of Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue to eliminate permanant blow-off assembly and loop water system. 2. Provide sidewalk along frontage of Ewing Avenue in accordance with Community Development Code Section 3-1701. The above shall be addressed prior to DO. All of the following to be addressed prior to building permit 1. A double detector check valve with bypass meter shall be required for any internal fire protection line. 2. Crushed concrete shall be utilized instead of crushed rock for base under architectural paver walkway. 3. The City of Clearwater will provide water taps, set the water meters and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 4. Doghouse manhole shall be set on either a precast or poured in place concrete slab. 5. Thrust blocks are not permitted, use of mechanical restraints is required (Water Distribution Note # 9). 6. Obtain permit for all work in City rights-of--way. Note -Sheets 2, 7, 8, 9, ] 0 and 11 will be reviewed in detail at application for building permit. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 5, 2006 -Page 17 • • Environmental: 1 . Application for buy-in to Downtown Stormwater Service District received. Note: Final payment required prior to building permit Fire: 1 . Page 4 #l5 Change NFPA 13 to NFPA 13R and add the comment"each unit to have it's own riser, control valves and water flow bell. PRIOR TO DO 12/1.8/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN 2 . Provide Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations /Water Study due PRIOR TO DO. 12/1.8/05 NOT ADDRESSED 1N REVISED PLAN 3 . Page 6 Show a fire hydrant at the Martin Luther King Jr entry pointy that is on the same side of street as project. PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVLSED PLAN 4 . Page 5 Show paver sidewalk details specifying that they will withstand the 80,000 lb weight of fire apparatus. PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN 5 . Page 4 #13 change listed codes to the current codes. 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED IN REVISED PLAN 6 . A seperate fire underground permit is required to be pulled by a Class 1, 2 or 5 licensed contractor. Add note to plan PRIOR TO DO 12/18/05 NOT ADDRESSED 1N REVISED PLAN Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: t _ No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . Revise general landscaping note #2 on page LS2 to indicate Florida Grade #1 instead of Nursery Grade #1. 2 . Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. 3 . Revise tree and landscape legends to include the "quantities" Parks and Recreation: l . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Site data table needs to be corrected to show number and type of existing units, number of proposed units and gross square footage of property. Stormwater: 1 . Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following conditions are to be met: 1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit to Development Services. 2) It is recommended that an additional type C grate inlet be constructed on the private road that connects MLK to Ewing. This is to accommodate the amount of runoff generated in a 10 year storm on a road with a 2% grade. 3) The storm pipe proposed on Ewing Ave is to be 18"RCP to accommodate the postdevelopment site runoff and the adjacent road drainage. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 5, 2006 -Page l 8 • 1 • 1 . Revise the architec%ural site plan to show Ewing St. on the West and MLIC on the East. 2. The civil and architectural plan do not match i.e. sidewalk width, and driveway depth. 3. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the individual driveways on the landscape site plan. (City's Corrvnunity Development Code, Section 3-904). 4. All individual driveways must be a minimum of 19' from face of garage to back edge of sidewalk to prevent a vehicle from overlapping sidewalk blocking pedestrian pathway and/or road. All of the above to be addressed prior to DO. General note(s): A. Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. B. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: 1 . This comment is addressing a seperate issue, the property owner has not appointed Burcaw & Assoc as an approved agent. Number 3 of the afadavit to authorize agent is appointing the property owner to act for themselves. Number 3 needs to be revised to show Burcaw & Associates. The Affidavit to Authorize Agent is authorizing the owner to represent themselves. Based on how the application has been filled out, should not Burcaw -Brian Wilkes be the agent. Clarify. 2 . The Downtown design guidelines require buildings to have a distinct base, middle, and cap. Some of the unit designs appear to lack these elements. 3 . The rear building elevations (north and south) are too bland; they need additional details. 4 . On the front building elevations explain why the base blocks are different heights. 5 . Staff would like to see the roof details of the plain roof structures enhanced with an appropriate architectural feature of some sort. 6 . The fences along the north and south property lines indicate 8' PVC, but the note at the top of the page indicates "proposed 6' (max)" -Six foot is the maximum height -see Civil Site Plan pg 4. 7 . Explain why the windows on the second floor, front building elevation for the corner units are smaller than the rest on the second floor. See page 7 of the architects building plans. (the upper building elevations, first set of windows on the second floor from the right) 8 . A sidewalk along Ewing Street needs to be provided to maintain an urban and pedestrian friendly environment. 9 . Provide a screen around both the elec transformers to make them less obtrusive, but not unaccessible (fence, wall, and/or landscaping). 10 . Architectural site plan and civil site/landscape plans do not match with regards to unit Type D's front porch, front door, and sidewalk locations. 1 l . What is the structure located directly south of the proposed transformer along Ewing Avenue. ] 2 . Clarify two notes located on Civil sheet 4 that state "5' CMU Wall" along Ewing and MLK. 13 . Note on plans that walls facing street rights of ways will be painted/finished to match the architectural style of the buildings. 14 . 15 . Revise the second sentence of the second paragraph of the project description. The proposed townhome community is a Level One Flexible Standard use, not a Permitted use. 16 . Revise or remove the last paragraph of the project description. Town Lake Residential District Policies do apply to the proposed project. 17 . Clarify. How is the proposed use in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of ADJACENT properties? Reply to each seperately as the project narrative did not address. Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 5, 2006 -Page l9 Jan. 04 2006 10:23AM YOUR LOGO . YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98138823808 Jan. 04 10:21AM 01'38 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPOf2T, PRESS ' hHJU' #204. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-~0-HELP-FAX C435-7329). _._._ o;~'~ -~~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER >_ ~a,~~,t~r PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~`~`~ ~~ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW ATER. C OM December 22, 2005 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 211 EWING AVE (FLS2005-11089) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 211 EWING AVE, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 24 unit townhome community in the Downtown Town Lake Residential Character District, per Section 2-902.C.. On January O5, 2006, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be January O5, 2006. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-562-4547 or John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on January O5, 2006. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, lC~~~~~~-~ ~_ John Schodtler Planner I Letter of Notification - FLS2005-11089 - 211 EWIIVG AVE LLP ~~~ n~ °~ ~arwat~r ~, ..~. U December 22, 2005 Brian Wilkes 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue Suite A Tampa, Fl 33625 CITY OF CLE RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. COM RE: PLT2005-00029 -- 21 1 EWING AVE -- Letter of Completeness Dear Brian Wilkes The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: PLT2005-00029. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on February 02, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner I Letter of Completeness - PLT2005-00029 -111 EWING AVE _ • := CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX .4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 HUGHES PLUMBING SUPPLY LTD 501 WEST CHURCH ST ORLANDO FL 32805 - 2247 KEHRER, JOEL J MC KINLEY, FRANK L 205 S MARTIN LUTHER KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5714 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 KEHRER, JOEL J MC KINLEY, FRANK L 205 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - KELLER, KLAUS 1615 ST PAULS DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6451 THACKER, O S WILDER, FRED J PO BOX 1808 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1808 CICERO, VICTOR S CICERO, CAROL A 405 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5711 ' Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Doug Williams PO Box 8204 Clearwater, F133758 I CLEARWATER HOUSING AUTH~ PO BOX 960 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0960 KEHRER, JOEL J MC KINLEY, FRANK L 205 S MARTIN LUTHER KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5714 KELLER, KLAUS A KELLER, JOAN M 1615 SAINT PAULS DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6451 KEHRER, JOEL J MC KINLEY, FRANK L 205 S MARTIN LUTHER KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5714 CHESNUT, TOM T CHESNUT, ARTHUR C SR & JEANNE 4411 MELROSE AVE TAMPA FL 33629 - 5523 HUGHES PLUMBING SUPPLY LTD 501 WEST CHURCH ST ORLANDO FL 32805 - 2247 SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES 940 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5745 BALOW, RONALD D THE FOLINO, JOHN F 201 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5714 TACK & WARREN INC 806 PIERCE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5526 KEHRER, JOEL J MC KINLEY, FRANK L 205 S MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - KELLER, KLAUS A KELLER, JOAN M 1615 SAINT PAULS DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6451 KNIGHT, JAMES P 509 HARBOR DR BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3253 GENROC GROUP 639 CLEVELAND ST # 340 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4188 S P GREENWOOD 25400 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 154 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2150 211 Ewing JVS FLS2005-11089 • ~ ~~'~~~ ~%~~ Conditions Associated With ~; '~~~ FLS2005-11089 ~~ :. ~_~ _'q1p - _ ~~~ ~~ 211 EWING AVE tyQT~F~,~~~' sxf~ Environmental Condition Heather Faessle 562-4897 11/21/2005 Downtown Buy-In application received. Not Met Note: Final payment required prior to building permit Parks 8~ Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 11/17/2005 Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if Not Met applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Site data table needs to be corrected to show number and type of existing units, number of proposed units and gross square footage of property. Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 11/17/2005 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following conditions are to be met: Not Met 1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit to Development Services. 2) It is reccmmended that an additional type C grate inlet be constructed on the private road that connects MLK to Ewing. This is to accomodate the amount of runoff generated in a 10 year storm on a road with a 2% grade. 3) The storm pipe proposed on Ewing Ave is to be 18"RCP to accomodate the postdevelopment site runoff and the adjacent road drainage. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 11/04/2005 Provide one copy of colored building elevations. Not Met 11/04/05 Provide one copy of colored building elevations and please include the color chips or swatches. 11/04/2005 This comment is addressing a seperate issue, the property owner has not appointed Burcaw & Not Met Assoc as an approved agent. Number 3 of the affadavit to authorize agent is appointing the property owner to act for themselves. Number 3 needs to be revised to show Burcaw 8~ Associates. The Affidavit to Authorize Agent is authorizing the owner to represent themselves. Based on how the application has been filled out, should not Burcaw -Brian Wilkes be the agent. Clarify. Print Date: 11/28/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 • • Clearwater U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd FlOOr CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 To: ~~ ~ 5 FAX: 8~~J ~3Z~ 55t$ Phone: FROM: JO La tJ S Phone: DATE: ~ ~ 2 S ~~ SUBJECT: 02l l ~ t ~~ - FL5 Zoos - (~ o$ q MESSAGE: _(~D'M t~ 6~"'~ NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Nov. 28 2005 08:04AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98136305518 No~.28 08:03AM 00'53 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPOT, PRESS ' h1Eh0.J' #t84. THBJ SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-~-FE~P-FA6C C435-7329). o ~ ,~~ }~~~ ~arwat~r .,; November 18, 2005 Brian Wilkes 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue Suite A Tampa, F133625 ~CIT`Y OF CLE~RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARWATER. C OM RE: FLS2005-11089 -- 211 SWING AVE -- Letter of Completeness Dear Brian Wilkes The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-11089. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on January O5, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, CY~"~~, John Schodtler Planner I Letter of Completeness - F'LS2005-11089 - 211 SWING AVE ~ ~~ .~ ~ Nov. 18 2005 61:35PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 61 98138823808 Nov. 18 01:34PM 00'39 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRPSS 'h~#J' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. t FOR FAX ADUANTAC~ ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-860-HAP-FAX C435-7329). Message ~ ~ Page 1 of 2 Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 8:58 AM To: 'Brian S. Wilkes' Cc: Thompson, Neil Subject: RE: FLS2005-11089 - 211 Ewing Avenue Brian, The deadline to resubmit for a completeness review was Wednesday, November 9. I received your message stating you would have the resubmittal to me on Thursday, which I accepted. After review of your application, a further extension was given until Monday, to wait for the Architectural plans to be submitted. As of today, Thursday November 17, I have not received the revised Architectural plans. This issue has pushed the project back to the January 16, 2006 Development Review Committee meeting, provide the architectural plans arrive prior to November 30.. The issue with the affidavit can be addressed at the DRC, as I believe we had a misunderstanding with the direction I gave you. This is not a completeness item and if it were on its own would not have triggered incompleteness. John Schodtler Planner I -----Original Message----- From: Brian S. Wilkes [mailto:bwilkes@burcawinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 5:03 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: Andrew Greenwood Subject: FLS2005-11089 - 211 Ewing Avenue John, In regards to the Letter of Incompleteness dated 11/14/05, Rojo Architects are putting items 1 and 2 together for your review and suggest that they will deliver by Monday the 21st. I was given the impression that those items would be submitted last Friday. In response to the application and Affidavit to Authorize Agent, I will be happy to stop by and cross Burcaw's name off of the Agent line of the application, if that is necessary. As I pointed out in my response to the first Incompleteness Letter, the application was filled out the way it was because of direction given by you at a previous DRC meeting. The brief discussion centered around Burcaw being copied on all City comments in a timely manner to avoid having to rely on the client. It was then suggested by you to list Burcaw as the agent on the application so that correspondence was sent to me. The intent is to have City correspondence copied to me but keep signing authority with the owner. If this is not possible without revising the Affidavit, please remove our name from the Agent line in the application. I also wanted word on whether these issues will push this project back a month for DRC, and how to avoid this if possible. Brian S. Wilkes Project Manager Burcaw and Associates, Inc. 11/17/2005 Message ~ ~ Page 2 of 2 6402 West Linebaugh Avenue, Suite A Tampa, Florida 33625 Tel 813.882.4815 ext. 248 Fax 813.882.3808 bwilkes @ burcawinc.com 11/17/2005 Clearwater November 14, 2005 Brian Wilkes 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue Suite A Tampa, Fl 33625 `> CI~'YOFCLE~RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MY C LEARW ATER. C OM RE: FLS2005-11089 -- 211 EWING AVE -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Brian Wilkes The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-11089. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide one set of building elevations with dimensions from existing grade to ultimate top of building. Plans provide only indicate to finish roof. 2. Provide one copy of colored building elevations and please include the color chips or swatches. 3. This comment is addressing a seperate issue, the property owner has not appointed Burcaw & Assoc as an approved agent. Number 3 of the afadavit to authorize agent is appointing the property owner to act for themselves. Number 3 needs to be revised to show Burcaw & Associates. The Affidavit to Authorize Agent is authorizing the owner to represent themselves. Based on how the application has been filled out, should not Burcaw -Brian Wilkes be the agent. Clarify. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Wednesday, November 30, 2005 (12:00) to be eligible to go to the January 5; 2005 Development Review Committee (DRC) Meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner I Letter oflncompleteness - FLS2005-11089 - 211 EWING AVE !~, ~ • Nov. 14 2005 03:51PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98138823808 Nov. 14 03:50PM 00'43 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS ' h1EN<J' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-~0-HELP-FAX 0435-73291. 'Clearwater November 04, 2005 Brian Wilkes 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue Suite A Tampa. Fl 33625 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM RE: FLS2005-11089 -- 211 SWING AVE -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Brian Wilkes The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-11089. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide one set of building elevations with dimensions from existing grade to ultimate top of building. Plans provide only indicate to finish roof. 2. Provide estimated project value of entire development. 3. Provide one copy of colored building elevations and please include the color chips or swatches. 4. Could not locate a Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist" as checked off on the FLS application. Please contact Arborist, Rick Albee 727-562-4741. 5. The Affidavit to Authorize Agent is authorizing the owner to represent themselves. Based on how the application has been filled out, should not Burcaw -Brian Wilkes be the agent. Clarify. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Wednesday, November 9, 2005 (12:00 Noon). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater. com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner I Letter oflncompleteness - FLS2005-11089 - 211 SWING AVE Pinellas County Property Appra~r Information: 15 29 15 16830 002 0 15 / 29 ~ 15 / 10~~0 I 002 / 010 Page 2 of 7 10-NoU-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:26:00 Ownership Info-rmation Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales EWIHG DEUELOPMEHT LLP OBK: 14629 OPG: 0572 2840 WEST BAY DR # 279 BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL 33770 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 211 EWIHG AUE of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.0 2 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/P age Price {QuallUnQ) VaclImp Plat Information 9 12,005 14,629/ 572 625,000 {M) I 1927: Book 020 Pgs 026- 6 /1,991 7,594./ 178 122,300 {Q} I 1917: Book 001 Pgs 016- 3 /1,989 6,9511 347 125,000 {Q} I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 11,970 3,438) 98 28,500 {Q} I 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 125,000 Homestead: HO Ownership ~ .000 Govt Exem: HO Use ~: .000 AssessedlCap: 125,000 Institutional Exem: HO Tax Exempt ~: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 125,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 2,904.65 1) 50 x 150 6. 00 7, 500. 00 S Special Tax CWIA .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 lJithout the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 2, 904.65 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 LJithout any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 2, 904.65 Short Legal COACHMAN HEIGHTS REU BLFC B, LOT 11 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 11/10/2005 Pinellas County Property Appra.is~er Information: 15 29 15 16830 002 0~ Page 3 of 7 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 15 I 29 ~ 15 / 1f830 I 00~ 1 0110 :01 10-Hov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:26:02 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 211 EWING AUE Prop Use: 500 Land Use: 48 Structural E1sm~nts Foundation SpreadJMono Footing Floor System Slab Platform Height Exterior l.Jall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party gall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Bar JoistlRigid Fram Roof Cover Built UpJCompositian Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Hone Total Units 0 Heating & Air Hone Fixtures 4 Bath Tile Hone Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,966 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arsas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1} Base Area 1.00 2,880 7} .00 0 2) Sales Service Area 1.50 1,200 $} .00 0 3) . 00 0 9} . DO 0 4} .00 0 10} .00 0 5} . DO 0 11) . 00 0 6) .00 0 12} .00 0 Commercial Extra Featur+E;s Description Dimensions Price Units Value F2CD Year 1} CANOPY 192 SF 4.00 192 770 770 1,966 2} ASPHALT 1500 SF 1.50 1,500 2,250 2,250 999 3} .00 0 0 0 0 ~} . ao 0 0 0 0 5} .00 0 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 3,020 Map With 2005 Sales (Red), 2004 Sales (Green), 2003 Sales (Blue) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 11/10/2005 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 15 29 15 16830 002 0~ Page 4 of 7 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (1997) W H ~: http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 11/10/2005 Pinellas County. Property Appra~er Information: 15 29 15 16830 002 0~ Page 5 of 7 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2000) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 11 /10/2005 Pinellas County Property Appra~r Information: 15 29 15 16830 002 0~ Page 6 of 7 ~~_ ,~~ r ~, ~ ~ ' , ~.. `~ . ~: ~ ...'~ r ~ ~~ ~. ~~ ~. 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3 &t=1 &t2=1 &t... 11 /10/2005 Pinellas County Property Appra~r Information: 15 29 15 16830 002 0~ Page 7 of 7 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t=1 &t2=1 &t... 11 /10/2005 AS-BUILT R V E Y ADDRESS 211 EWING AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PLAT NORTH ~~ ~~ -U~'~ SCALE 1' 50' FCM 3913° ^ NE CORNER OF THE SOUTH 10.0' OF LOT 20 BLOCK B 0.5 260.37'(M) ~~~I~~j~,~~ ~`~ MARTIN LUTHER K/NG JR. AVENUE (F) R/M EC£. =32.31 GREENWOOD AVENUE (P) S. INV. =28.29' N INV. 28.28' 150-00'(0) SOUTH 149.65 (M) g7) ~ 3i ~! ~~J )~~ (323 ^ - 9~., '50.87)_. ~ttl /r 31.37~.i TY 32.31).~~ 12.68) ~nl 1 9) 3 ' ~., 32.5) FIR 1/2 - x-a O N 0 30.6 LOT 25 a BLOCK B `~ °o o ,~ 0 0 4i a O! (X 32.2) =EXISTING ELEVATION ELEVATIONS ARE RELATIVE TO NAVD 1988. (30.2 LOT 10 BLOCK H NOTE.- THIS SURVEY REFLECTS ALL 2g,3 64SEMENTS SHOWN AS EXCEPTIONS ( TITLE COMMITMENT NO.: C-05164599 WRITTEN BY STEWART 71TLE GUARANTY COMPANY. EFFECTIVE DATE.' 06/10/05. 4.0' - (2~ ~ 260.00'(TM) N.00' 17'33 "W. 255.32'(M) ~~s _ ~ -S _ V FIR 1/2" J ~ i o o ~ ._ ~ o U ~ IAT 27 ~ BLOCK H ~ 21 PALA~ x 31.81 ~ 32.0) U 32 9) o x-x-x-x-x-x-x(~;•x-x-x-x-~;~~•x-~';'k-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-a ~ ~ IAT 28 ~ BLACK B i ' i 31.4) ~ o e (xi j 7 c ~ ~ LAT 28 ~ ' ' BIACK B c Z) i , O ~ 30 ,V Q 24 OAK i (p 3~,2) (Xj 31.2) 15 PALM ' ' 24 OAK i i ~ ~ ~ i ) ~ ; 31,4 ~ 2B OAK (w LAT 11 ~ ~ ; 30 OAh BIACK B ~ ; ~ ~ 30 8) o ; x O ~18""OAK ; ~ ~ ONE STORY MA ~ / ~ h~ 15" 12" i Q CLUSTER 0 9) ~ SONRY ~ IAT 13 (x 3 #211 ; C127 OAH BLACK B ~ IQT 12 i BLOCK H 48.1' i i i ~ ~ 4) , 8' ~ conyC ~ 8 OA9 7) x;30.3) ; ~x 2 ( . ~ Di ~ i k MON/TOR/NG ~ ' k ~ d: DWELL ~ ~ Zg 4) i~ 0) 21 OAK '~ f*l x- x- x- ~ ~~~x~ x-QTl~7'~1/V')F'" FCM 3'713" x- x- ? 1 PALM 3~ 5) LOT za BIACK B OT 12 33.1) ~o ~- o N O O p O M 132.6) N <o 2 ~ ~ r ~. .` --1 _ .i__.., .. ~ .. ~_ s 32.,) ~~~ 0 2 2005 _. IAT `14' - - - t ~, BIACK H ' ~ ' ' 31.2) 3p.2) Zg 1~ ~ `~ `~ J `'6 s `, NW ORNER OF THE SOUTH 10.0' OF LOT 5 ~ ~p ~ ~~ J ~oa ~8~ __~ - m,~ ~~,SJ J BLOCK B ~59~ ~ssrpJ ~~?B J ?~.J? J EW/NG AVENUE N-00'00 36 E 150. 10'(M) 150.00'(0) NOTES: THIS SURVEY WAS MADE ON THE GROUND UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, FlEID WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 06-14-05, WHICH IS THE DATE OF THE SURVEY. BASIS OF BEARINGS: WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF GREENWOOD AVENUE: ASSUMED N00.00'00"E SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR OTHER NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND LEGEND- FLOOD INFORMATION: LEGAL: SECTION: 15 TOWNSHIP: 29S RANGE: 15E CERTIFIED TO ZONE: X LOTS 11,12, 13, 26, 27 & 28, BLOCK B, COACHMAN HEIGHTS REPEAT, No~AN ~~~ u~c SIEMART n7lE ac' PMF1U5, iNc NUMBER: 12103C0108G ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT ~eAc 6 n~A-r""~~'A eACO~v '~"Y BtYAN .4 SfANIEY, PA BOOK 20, PAGE 26 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, m N. Ko«uTe, FRANK L waaNUY..kxrsr case, Esa. DATE: 9/3/03 FLORIDA. *____~. _ - ,, ,C~~~IFItC~,,TION: S SURVEY PROS, INC. ,n ~~IS 's'~uR.~Y i~,r~oEVU3D'"NITNOUT'fi3iE~~CNAIURE ANO rdRldr~r RAISED +"~„ (~F/`+~!]`OA'•SURVk;YOR do MAPPER '`~ b ` ° ' / ' `~~ URVEY LICENSED BUSINESS No. 7252 ~ <. ~ % ~ ~ ~ ~ P 1425 GULF TO BAY BLVD. ~ ~ o' `v ~...,irte; c, , '/. w ~ !' ` ROS, INC. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PH (727) 449-9010 FAX 33755 (727) 449-9006 . f~.;. ri;! ~;- 4 ~;r ;/ F '~ s; ' O s G. 'P ` A" ~~ . % , - r .: , •., , ~ 9 ~ • f ~ { G tti m e ~'~ r ?R> ~ :~Y s..~. t Y REVISION DATE: a ~I'k t~~~;,;,,,,~,,.,r FIELD WORK BY• TT DATE: 06-14-05 is ODD-~09~- AS~~ PAGE # +.~`~f"~ ~ /~ ~~ 2: 09-16-OS DRAWN BY• BW DATE: 09-OS-OS R~ DRENCE~miE~ .1 GAB OS-0452 ~~~ICK 5. BACHMANN lE 0 SIGNATURE • TS COYMrtMENT )# FlOR10w PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER 5174 r A =ARC A/C = A!R CONDITIONER AE =ACCESS EASEMENT B/C =BACK OF CURB BFE =BASE FLOOD ELEVATION BFP = BACK FLOW PREVENTION BM =BENCHMARK BRG =BEARING C =CURVE CAN =CABLE TV RISER C. C.C.L. =COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE CALC =CALCULATED CB =CATCH BASIN CHB =CHORD BEARING CH = CHORD DISTANCE CINL =CURB INLET CLF =CHAIN LINK FENCE CM =CONCRETE MONUMENT CMP =CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CO =CLEAN OUT CONC =CONCRETE CSW =CONCRETE SIDEWALK C/S = CONCRETE SLAB (D) = DEED DE =DRAINAGE EASEMENT DH = DRILL HOLE ELE =ELEVATION EOP =EDGE OF PAVEMENT EOW =EDGE OF WATER (F) =FIELD FCC =FOUND CROSS CUT FCM =FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT FFE =FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FH =FIRE HYDRANT FlP =FOUND IRON PIPE FlR = FOUND IRON ROD FIRC =FOUND IRON ROD AND CAP FN =FOUND NAIL FND =FOUND FPP = FDUND IRON PINCH PIPE G/A =GUY ANCHOR GFE =GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION H&T = HUB & TACK lD = IDENTIFICATION (L) =LEGAL DESCRIPTION LB =LICENSED BUSINESS LLFE =LOWEST LIVING FLOOR ELEVATION LP = LIGHT POLE (M) =FIELD MEASUREMENT MAS =MASONRY MES =MITERED END SECTION MHD =DRAINAGE MANHOLE MHS =SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MHE = ELECTRIC MANHOLE MHT = TELEPHONE MANHOLE N&D =NAIL AND DISK NTS =NOT TO SCALE 0/A = OVERALL OHP =OVERHEAD POWER LINE ORB =OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK (P) = PLAT PB =PLAT BOOK PC =POINT OF CURVATURE PCC = POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE PCP =PERMANENT CONTROL POINT P! = POINT OF INTERSECTION •~ PK =PARKER KAYLON NAIL PLS =PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR POB =POINT OF BEGINNING POC =POINT OF COMMENCEMENT PP =POWER POLE PRC =POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE PRM =PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT PT = PDINT OF TANGENCY (R) = RADIAL R =RADIUS RCP =REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RG =RANGE R/W = RIGHT OF WAY RR SPK =RAIL ROAD SPIKE SIRC =SET IRON ROD & CAP LB # 7252 SEC =SECTION SNLD =SET NAIL & DISC LB # 7252 T/B = TOP OF BANK TBM = TEMPORARY BENCHMARK TECO = TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY TPD =TELEPHONE RISER (TM) =TAX MAP TRNF = TRANSFORMER T/S= TOE OF SLOPE TWP = TOWNSHIP UE = UTILITY EASEMENT UGT = UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UP = UTILITY POLE WDN = WOODEN WF =WOOD FENCE W/C = WITNESS CORNER W/L = WITNESS LINE WM = WATER METER WV = WATER VALVE "' =DELTA DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS THEREOF. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS FURNISHED BY THE CLIENT UNLESS OTHER WISE NOTED. NO UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION LOCATED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT ABSTRACT OR TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY BE MATTERS OF PUBLIC RECORD NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. ATTENTION lS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT THIS SURVEY MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED OR ENLARGED IN SIZE DUE TO REPRODUCTION. THIS SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN OBTAINING SCALED DATA. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT OR DETERMINE OWNERSHIP. ALL EASE,4fENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY SHOWN HEREON ARE PER THE RECORDED PLAT OR FURNISHED BY THE CLIENT. and associates, inc. The Client's Engineering Solution. An Employee Owned Company. November 2, 2005 Ms. Terry Finch City of Clearwater Engineering Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33735 RE: Efa Townhomes Downtown Stormwater Service District Application STR 15-29S-15E Dear Ms. Finch: • p r ~y C ~ '~.s~ ~ ~ Y ~~ ~ a On behalf of our client, we are applying to tie into the Clearwater Downtown Stormwater Pond. Enclosed are four (4) copies of the Clearwater Downtown Stormwater Service District Application, and four (4) sets of Site Plans for your review. The proposed. project is a 24-unit townhome community located between Ewing Avenue and MLK Jr Avenue, south of Pierce Street in downtown Clearwater. The existing site is contains one single-story building and associated concrete and asphalt vehicular use areas, and drains to Ewing Avenue into the City's system and into the Clearwater Downtown Pond. Please see application for existing and proposed impervious /pervious areas. Currently, no City Stormwater structures or piping are located in the immediate area, south of Pierce Street. We propose to install an inlet at the west end of our site, and install an 18" RCP to run north along Ewing Street and tie in at the City's manhole at Pierce Street. It is requested that our efforts to improve the City's system be recognized in the Town Pond buy-in fee. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Matthew Campo, P.E. or me at (813) 882-4815. Sincerely, BURCAW AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~ Brian S. Wilkes, E.I. Project Manager cc: Ewing Development LLP File 05747pr .- \ I ~OV 0 2 205 8402 West Linebaugh Avenue • Suite A • Tampa, Florida 8362 Tel 8'13.882.48'15 Fax 8'13.882.8808 www.burcawinc.com /' • LL ale arwater U ... v Engineering Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4747 Fax: 727-562-4755 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 3 COPIES OF THE ORGINIAL APPLICATION INCLUDING SITE PLANS .y ~~ h ~ A qq CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN STORMWATER SERVICE DISTRICT APPLICATION PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION APPLICANT NAME: P.6FV/hcs~.Ip IJ~eq,~/ , ~bcJ/N'E~ rjEyEl..c~,~r~EitTGLP MAILING ADDRESS: Z$% 6~~'rYiE+y DRrvE, ~Z~9 ~ [~LL~~2 ~~cvir7=S. F~ 33 7•~0 E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: - F' PROPERTY OWNER (S): ~lvi~/6, J~/~eoP~rl~h-LLB nU ~ ~5 (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME (S): t3~'IA~/ Lclit~ES , t=3ts~~ ~~SS~+c:.v~s MAILING ADDRESS: ~~ Lcl• laNEg9r1~NAvE~ruE~ Ti~.-~7~'i4i /=~ 33~L.~ E-MAIL ADDRESS: 6E~i/~~s~~rc~~~-ccor+~ PHONE NUMBER: L€3i3~~Z'~3~.5 CELL NUMBER: Cat 3~7~Y X35/ FAX NUMBER: C~r3~$~-3~8 Form 1365-0001 Rev.B/03 1 • • ~~~ ~,~ B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS of the subject site: Zif Eu}/~lE~Ay~n/Cl~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C~ N/11~c/ /~til~-.rr5 ~L-V /,jLlC ~j L~~-S ~/, /1~ i ~, z.~;L7 ZS PROPOSED USE and SIZE (type of business, number of dwelling units, acreage of building) ~ U,*J ~ ~' Tgla~~il'~ir1EC~an1/rll~i/s ?1~ IMPERVIOUS AREA EXISTING square feet BUILDING/SIDEWALK ~ e£~ VEHICULAR USE AREA ~f3S<c POND AREA IMPERVIOUS TOTAL (a ,~ ~S PERVIOUS AREA ~3g,o~S TOTAL SITE AREA acreage PROPOSED square feet Z7, yob '7, 37,.E ~ 73Z J0~2lcY ~S cac5 SF = i. C33 ~?-~ FOR CITY OF CLEARWATER'USE ONLY $ I8,595.00/peracre up to 1.5 acres e. . 1320 s . ft. = 0.0303 acres 18 5 5.00 ac 0.03= 5£3.48 9 ( g Cl ) , $18,595.00 x acres = $ OR $ 75,000.00 for projects larger. than i.5 acres .. _. PLUS25,000/per acre (e.g. total project size 3.5 acres; $7$;000.00 + (3.5 acres x $ 25,000.00) _ $ 162,500.00) $ 7.5,000 + (~_acres x $ 25,000.0.0).= $ ..TOTAL _. NOV Q 2 2005 Form 1365-0001 Rev. 8/03 2 ~'~-y,A~ -~'~~~ ~ % = -.' ~ ~.~ ~ ~ _. ' .~ i ADDITIONAL POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAMS: e. covered arkin /well car ro am xerisca e landsca m ~ g• P g P ~ P P g) ,~ E~ A ~,~, & 5 . F A a t? ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ;• ~~~ C. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representative to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signat property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ day of !~a ~~L~ ; A.D 20~ to me and/or by who is personally own produced as identification. Notary public, My commission expires: =o~~r~~~ DALEBARNETT MY COMMISSION #DD256813 ~~~ EXPIRES: OCTOB, 2007 .... _ .._ [~OV 0 2 2005 Form 1365-0001 Rev. 8/03 3 `io' . ,~ ... .:. ,- ``~:''~~ "",~-~~~= CITY (JF CLEARWATER `:~,=, I `~~,{~; PLANNING DEPARTMENT .. , `c\ , ~'~ygT~~~yyt~, POS,~ OFF,cE BOx 4748 CI.EARWATER, FI.OR~DA 33758-4748 ~~~i~«f f f MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CI.EARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TF.I.F.PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIANNLNG DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVED CASE # ~~ 2005 r 1 t cg9 March 23, 2006 CASE TYPE ~.LS Mr. Brian Wilkes DRC DATE o~04 0 ~' CDB DATE Burcaw & Associates SIGNATURE ~ 6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue PATE O 3 a- o ~ Suite A Tampa, FL 33625 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-11089 at 211 Ewing Avenue Dear Mr. Wilkes: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On August 4, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a 24-unit townhome community in the Downtown Town .Lake Residential Character District, per Section 2-902.C. The DRC APPROVED the application based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law with the following conditions of approval: Findings of Fact/Conclusions of Law: 1. The subject 1.033-acre site is zoned Downtown Town Lake Residential Character District; 2. The proposal complies with Attached Dwelling criteria under the provisions of Section 2-902.C; 3. The proposal complies with requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 4. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; 5. The proposal will conform to the Downtown Design Guidelines; 6. Flexibility in regard to use are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel; and 8. The proposed.development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, the landscape plan and plant material schedule be revised to make the plant quantities consistent; 2. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first; PnnNk tliisisniti), MAYOR Bu.i. )(>NSON, VR:r-MnvoR JonN D(~ww, C~>u~ru ~u:>nti:R I-IOrr Hnnui:roN, CoIiNCU.nu•:Misiai ® ~.r\RL1?N n. Pi:Ttazsr:N, CcxiNC:n~u:~usr:R "EOUAI. I;MPLOYMIiN'f ANI) AFFIRMA'I'IVIi A(aION I:MPLOI"I?R" J { March 23, 2006 }- F~,S2005-11089 '~ Page 2 3. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, a double detector check valve with bypass meter shall be required for any internal fire protection line; 4. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, Crushed concrete shall be utilized instead of crushed rock for base under architectural paver walkways; 5. The City of Clearwater will provide water taps; set the water meters and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees, prior to the issuance of any site or building permit; 6. Prior to the issuance of any site or building permit, Doghouse manhole shall be set on either a pre- cast or poured in place concrete slab; 7. Obtain permit for all work in City rights-of--way prior to the issuance of any site or building permit; 8. Final payment for buy-in to Downtown Stormwater Service District is required prior to the issuance of a building permit; 9. Provide an additional type C grate inlet on the private road that connects MLK to Ewing. This is to accommodate the amount of runoff generated in a 10 year storm on a road with a 2% grade; 10. The storm pipe proposed on Ewing Ave is to be 18" RCP to accommodate post-development; 11. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit prior to the issuance of a site or building permit; 12. Provide a screen around both the electric transformers to make them less obtrusive, but not inaccessible (fence, wall, and/or landscaping); 13. Mechanical and utilities equipment that are placed at grade must be placed in the least obtrusive location possible and screened from adjacent properties and rights-of--ways with fences, walls, and/or landscaping; 14. The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC; 15. The final design of the site and landscape plan be consistent with the plans submitted to the DRC; and 16. All signage be consistent to the design/colors submitted and comply with the requirements of the signage portion of the Community Development Code and Downtown Design Guidelines. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with above conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the application dated received November 2, 2005 and revised site plans and building elevations dated received March 8, 200. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (March 23, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years. of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. An extension of time maybe granted by the Community Development Coordinator for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Coordinator may approve an additional extension of time not to exceed one year for good cause shown and documented in writing. The coordinator must receive the request for this extension within the one-year period of validity after the original time extension. The Community Development Coordinator may approve an additional extension of time not S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslEwing 211 Ewing Street Townhomes (D) - ApprovedlFLS2005-11089 Development Order.doc March 23, 2006 ,~ `~ FLS2005-11089 Page 3 to exceed on year for good cause shown and documented in writing. The coordinator must receive the request for this extension within the one-year period of the validity after the original extension. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that maybe required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner II at 727-562-4547. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Vnactive or Finished CaseslEwing 211 Ewing Street Townhomes (D) - ApprovedlFLS2005-11089 Development Order.doc rojoArch itectu re,com COVER MAC o~ loos p~iNING QEpgRT~ENT CIY pF CLEgRwgTER I iRCVY05-0(~OOP~OUE9M~LY HIKE ~ sx avairtcnxu Hnxs.,rv~u~ ~I , wcH~AIQVG HKrtrnua I 5'CMJWIll nrmme nixie uxie ~xmrto,a' as 'acx ICH&W 3 I q~FO I]U.-5<gIC ~EIYNK G6t F001 PNFS e)10~ ~ flE<WIN.ICIOFSHHLBRIre Pll ~! wmrKCaKwerz ~wnus un wnvsnoucHm,o rmfc~ na~nwrown uwaxxrs Hfr roo, area xam.m~va~ i arc HHxua~ HlCPoS®HC. DAMPS R R IDOL NR%Y]~e(IYAGU ME'PCWB PW fpp, raxxxwo J rCO V Z Y c w S J Z F- c Q x~%e>m PROPOSeDb Lf.-SCdIC ~FNNK P&LWiIreF%q10 rojoarchitectureLcom HVAC CONDENSING UNITS ARE LOCATED ON ROOF STRUCTURE SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 25'-0" ~~ ~~ -~ I) ORIGINAL L&~~.~ ~' '"'~ ~-,~, RECEIVED ~'~ ~ SHC~,~,~~~~~~reAU M~~ 08 °°m~,~°"~"~W"'a 2006 A~M,aP~F~ w,oA~A~L%~~ ~~,~~~~, PLANNING DEPARTMENT N f~b~' ~,~.,G~,~j~~iiER All property depictions, p renderings are for general information purposes wily and may not reflect final building conditions. W Q ll 11 ~ ~~o ~Oo~9G~~0o~1[~g 4 31'-8" FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAr~ 08 2006 PLANNING DEPARiMEN CIY OF CLEARWAiER All property depicn~ons, floor plans, and artist renderings are for general information purposes only and may not reflect final building conditions. rojoarchitecture,com KEY PLAN UNIT TYPE A ~ ~' _ I ~i 7i 1 ~ - - i SCALE: 1" =10'-0" Q ~ N V O~ W V11 ~ ~~~~ __ i 24'-8" 4 c~ BEDROOM 10'0" x 12'6" BATHROOM 5'0" x 8'0" i----~ DN ~ -- i - -~ i ----- i ~~ i oo i O® MASTER BATHROOM` 10'2° x 5'2" 1 MASTER BEDROOM 13'4" x 1 T4" O x FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR ORIGINAL RECENED PANNING I?~PARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAT~ All property depictions, floor plans, and artist renderings are for general information purposes only and may not reflect final building conditions. KEY PLAN , ~ ~ UNIT TYPE B ~,~ rojoarchitecture,com SCALE; 1°=,0~-0° " ~Oo °~1~0~1~g ai ~n~~ 4 c~ FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR ~~ MAST BATH ~~~B~~ 9~B~~ MASTER BEDROOM 21'5" x 12'1" . ~~_ ~~ O' BEDROOM i 11'0" x 11'8" THIRD FLOOR ORIGINAL RECENED MAC 0 8 2006 PLANNING LEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER All property depictions, floor plans, and artist renderings are for general infomuttion purposes only and nay not reflect final building conditions. KEY PLAN ~ ~ UNIT TYPED l~ rojoarchitecture,com SCALE:I"=~o~-0" " _ ~OoW~I~lOof~~~ _`i ,, ;~ COLOR LEGEND 0 SW 2803 ROCILWOOD TERRA COTTA © SW 2804 RENWICK ROSE BEIGE © SW 2823 ROCKW000 CLAY OD SW 2622 DOWNING SAND of SW 7035 AESTHETIC WNRE OF CERAMIC TILE-COBALTBLUE © PGTSTANDARDBRONZEFINISH e 0 ~ n e e ~ o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ O'er WJ WE I - W BUILDING I SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING II NORTH ELEVATION (SIM) E I U 1 n r~ D J J 6 9 G I 12 112 72 ko ~_ E 0 0„, O ~= i v ^ ^ ^ / E IC D ~ O :5' O ~ ~_ C 0 ~= 11 D 10 10 10 10 1J D !!+ 0,~ ~ ® 0 "~ WHEN LOCATED ON THE ROOF OF A BUILDING, MECHANICAL E6~UIPMENT IS TO BE INTERGRATED INTO THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING THROUGH THE USE OF PARAPET WALLS, TOWERS OR OTHER ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS. ALL PARAPETS WILL BE USED TO HIDE ALL HVAC UNITS, ARCHRFCTURAL ELEMENTS & MATERIALS Ol STUCCO O BUILT-UP STUCCO TRIM/ COPING O SINGLE HUNG, ALUMINUM FRAME WINDOW ® BRACKETS OS FULL PANEL WOOD DOOR © METAL GARAGE DOOR 07 FYPONBRACKEF-DECORATVE O CLAY BARRELROOFTILE 09 DOUBLE WOOD DOOR W/ FULLCLEAR GLASS 10 STONE BASE 11 RAISED STUCCO BASE 12 BLACK METAL RAILING 13 CMU BLOCK WALL W/PRECAST CAP 14 FYPONBAND-DECORATIVE 15 FULL PANEL WOOD DOOR W/VIEWING GLASS PANEL 16 FIXED GLASS ALUMINUM FRAME WINDOW 17 GUTTER, PTD COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT I WALL 08 FIXED VASE PLANTER 09 COMROLJOINT BUILDING I EAST ELEVATION BUILDING I WEST ELEVATION BUILDING II WEST ELEVATION (SIM) BUILDING II EAST ELEVATION (SIM) All property depictions, floor plans, and artist renderings are for general infarntation purposes only and may not reflect final building conditions. KEY PLAN ~ • ELEVATIONS rojoarchitect~re.com SCALE: 1'=20'-0" o - -- ----- --- ,. ~, - II~~~1~i10~1~g ~ I, J BUILDING I NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING II SOUTH ELEVATION (SIM) all architectural elements & material notes are similar to the adjacent elevation unless noted per elevah'ons CLAY BARREL CLAY BARREL RAISED STUCCO TILE-SPANISH "S" TILE-SPANISH "S" BAND, ALUM ROOF TILE ROOF TILE ROOF FLASHING, N PAINTED WOOD FASCIA a ~-~ FYPON BOARD, PAINTED ~ RAISED STUCCO WOOD FASCIA BAND, PAINTED WOOD BRACKETS, BOARD, PAINTED ~ PAINTED - RAISED STUCCO ~- BAND, PAINTED WOOD BRACKETS, PAINTED -'C N .._•. _...._.. ~ Q CV /~ ROOF PARAPET DETAIL AWNING SIDE DETAIL AWNING FRONT DETAIL 3 , ~ F ~ ,~ s ~ = ~ Scale: 3/4" =1'-0" 2 Scale; 1/2" =1'-0" Scale: 1/2" =1'-0" „ t,: . + i;,;h?';, '~ , F y Fj,~ ~ „ ~ _ STUCCO TRIM BA ND "~" ~ ' r z ~-~~ CLAY BARREL WROUGHT IRON ~ t ~'• TILE-SPANISH "S" ROOFTILE RAILING WOOD FASCIA PAINTED D ,. , 5 "~ ~~Nt~ "::~'~ , r~J , 'r~~'~~`~"~~~~ ;.~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~`~~~ WOOD FASCIA BOAR , KyN i ~4 ~( •y BOARD, PAINTED T ~ ~ . M1 ,~~y ~ r ~ n^+~ ~, ~~~, ~ ~~ ~~ WOOD BRACKETS - ~ ~ ~~"~ , ~ PAINTED ~ ~ ? SEE DETAIL 7 FOR TEXTURED STUCCO, ~ PICTURE AND FINISH °F PAINTED CEMENT PLASTER ALUM ROOF °P ~ ~ ~ R TRIM BAND a ~ ~ ~'~ FORECAST FIXTURE FLASHING, PAINTED ~ U VENEER STONE, TYP - 1- - i @ END UNITS ONLY ExrERIOR Gaa,oE . SEE PERSPECTIVE - FOR POTENTIAL ~ I I ~~ AUBURN BRONZE GU+SS WHITE BUBBLE ~"-' ~ AESTHETIC. I - ~ ~ LIGHTING FIXTURE DETAIL tdpd. 12 12 CEMENT PLASTER I ~ _ 7 Scale; N.T.S. ECENEp ~ R I I CONTROLJOINT _ i i - C o$ zoas MA _ TOWER ROOF DETAIL BALCONY DETAIL ENTRY DETAIL b E t y Scale: 3/4" =1'-0" - 5 Scale; 1/2" =1'-0" Scale: 1/2" =1'-0" ~ ~ pEPAR1M cy~ of ~~ ~ ~ EXT. FIXTURE rojoarchitecture,com ° 1>~Oo~~I~lO~I[~~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r N~V 10 2005 p~pNNMGDEPARTMENT C1N OF CLEARWAZER