The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2005-05037FLS2005-05037 840 ELDORADO AVE EHRLICH, DAVID PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS ATLAS # 249A ZONING: LMDR LAND USE: RU RECEIVED: 05/31/2005 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet _° Clearwater U C` '.. ' ~R~~~~~L Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ~~ ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE CASE #: (~ ~( ` DATE RECEIVED: ~~ - ~ RECEIVED BY (staff initlals)~_G ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: '~ NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PR1NT~ A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: -DW-y ~~~ ~Y~-~ 1~ Mh~ILINGADDRESS: -- ~3~ ~O~~~IW ~~' ~' PHONE NUMBER: 1 21 ' ~i~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ FAX NUMBER: ~Z~I ~ 't 1 ~ ~ 0 PROPERTY OWNER(S): AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: ~bd ~- E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED-DEVELOPMENT-I~~N((,..FORMcAT\\ION: (Code Section 4-202.A)- - - -- --- - STREET ADDRESS of subject site:-1+~ L 1 CJO~fl ~ ~!' ~v-c. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L'b 1. 3 ~~ OCL~ ~O Y^t M!N D 1'4 ~ ~'~ ~V ~A_~V~,,.5 i~7c~( _ (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) 1 - ; , PARCEL NUMBER: O~J 9 - IS ~~{ (e Io - Oe ~o ' OO 3 ~ PARCEL SIZE: ~d S ~ ' (acres, square feet) ~ _ PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): ~ ( 1.~ ~H'1M t ILLS l ~, I MAY „ (2~~5 (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresid `ritial use ~-~_ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT n it.,ts DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): ROCI}~o.J OF2 FTsOni" ~bt>C.~18S O~+ N~'4'M ~~gQ~~'F C~~.~WATEr~ Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all r,quested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) OF vvt ~>rw Q~~M A-~D ~ u A-nv •~~ oFP ~ dt©u ~ u e c~ t? cr},n. aP c,lL 1~~v~~ ~~..t~~v~ (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) aC-O ~~Nke.rush ~ (Z~ ' (py 1 ' ~ OD ~ FAX NUMBER: [ Z7 - ~ - ~ `'i ~ ' ~ 1 0 Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater ~ ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PRE~t'6USLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ^ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. ~ ~ }„p -~-IMPny~+e-va~w4~ Prue }~ loQ slr~~le~ t«, s~-,~-~ { Q u~l • ~ ~k {~nnS ~~ I.~4~~DSC+41f~~v~ t ~^+ S~~-o~ N p~ 5~2Jc~-v,ru-S W ~~'+ ~ r~p 1 <<y,-6 k. ~M.e r4s 'f'~ W- t ~ t w~. ~c ~/l A+ti D s c ~~e 2. - The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. nod,„ ~,,, lties~ beta ~;~ 0 Kra per.- r~-~- p ~. ~~ n..vi'-r~s w ~ t~ O N (M ~ w11~t rA ~c- G2 s *, .n ~- o y w p ~~h P no)~~'~ e/s,~ L~4-+~ O e~L 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. pno okc~ l~n c,<<S ~ o Uo~ 4' X Ge,e c~ gx ~S ~ ~ ~3{,n...~ ~~'a-e.S ~ ~ un,eN. S ~ dvJ S A-ri0 +aM~ t=p5 r~e/~ c t ~ P ~'- a.'cuwdv{~S ~ l y 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ~~ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Th esc ~o~~ ~ ~,~ ~s ~..~ ~ t1 ~~ In ~~. Pr s-fem.,, ~ r~. ~w+,# w ~5 iu0~' F~~wpJ~ 1~ GD~~s'~•~nt" Wt~ ~Uwdl,Ov.N 0~ ~-rL~Jc~S~S 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. 1V o ~! t ~ws3 w ~1A Ise wa-si~- ~ ~.4cc~ ~ yc. ~ ~ ~S ~,~ ye4~ ~.._-~--=-1 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ 1, ~~ I ~ ~~ , MAY :? f 2005 ~ pLANNINSE ~ CES OPMENT C~'Y OF CLEARWATER _ Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Resid i~l°1P5fiI 05- City of Clearwater ORIGINAL ^ 1. Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA-Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. _ t r~,~c. ~~ ~ S { l~Pn-,e.S, ifV Vu ~,~,r. ~JLNn +~! ~• O~M2/~.3 1 N ~t~~.bov.~nao~c 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) _ ~~+re, W ~ aM Q v~p De~c~ ~~D ~~ o~ ~M,~IG.~ l1 ~ u ~. b.9 ~U` , Lk t5'~'~~ ~V ~!'Ivt ~ • ~p 1M _SMR~Drt Mun~' v A-~vQ. 1 • ~ - Z W~ 3. The uses with~in-tt~h~eresidential infill prof\ect are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. t "~.~+e. ~ ~~~5~0 PrDL~~-T~aS RILe P~^-~+ ~? X~~56er.S '~~ i~,~w Nb~ ' W6U d~~ 1nt+N~n ~tC-e.GSS '~ SvuL~nov~D4`^P, ~~Q~-~-tcR 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. ~1 ~S S ~ YZ w ~H P~ ~,. ,t4,-a~ '~Q. N~ 1F~ In, bow. (n,o~ w ti~ ~~- ~ utip aw v~e.~+~•e.~f 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. l "~ ~ LS ~' ~ `{,a 5 SMI.~~ b9 b~~ 1l~~ e~hln A~1.G~-d ~ Y~~IM 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. '~4S S~~M1- wubi -Dw1~ ~~~0rit~- Sv~~w~v~ D~a~~-aC 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the diate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. i m m e - ~- ~ " t `~- ~' tS~ ~k7t3gQ . lS ~ ~-~y- A?Ow ~ C9~ ~ ~ IA~~ 14~wp !D~ h.G~.25 w ~ Nab ~~ ~,~ ~As~ Inoue Ass S~ ~• ~L ~..~ r-- .. __ . ~~ ~~ ~-- PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ' SERVICES C''" OF CLEARWATER __.J Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater • ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design C Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem~ to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; _ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ cknowledge~ent of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): S~mwater plan as noted above is included ~: stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ REE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this_application, the methodology_of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ~ _... ~T! ~ ;~ ~"-~ °~"' ~C~C~~~~ ~ ,' SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ~ i D ~ ; 'V./ All dimensions, ~ i _ North arrow; ' ` ! d _ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ,' ~ _ Location map; MAY „ ~ 2005 Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; i i _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; L._._.~_- _ .~,_J Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; ~ piANNING & DEVELOPMENT _ All required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; I SERVICES _ All required sight triangles; i C~'~' OF CLEARWATER _ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and s{sedim'~1"i"` trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater -- -- - - _ORIGINAL _ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of alf solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index#701}; _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ~ ^ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: '~ Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; r--~ ~- • -- ---- - _ _ ,~_ . _ - Building and structure heights; ++ ~~ ~ '~--~ (~ ((;;. ~ -~~. -' - Impermeable s (ace r)tio (LS.R.); and 1 ~ ~ ~ G ~~ I --, L Floor area ratio F.A.R. for all nonresidential uses. U Ilf_"7 I ^ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11) and color rendering if possible; ~ ~ i-1 i ,, ~ 11~j ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: MAY ~ ~ 2005 ~~/ _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; I Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel ~._..~_~~ _ .All open space areas; PLANNING & DEVELO------P.M~~~.EJJINT _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); SERVICES Streets and drives (dimensioned); CI'Y OF CLEARWATER Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); ~ _ Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and. proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent #o the site,. by species, size and locations, including d_ riplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; _ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11) (color rendering if possible); ^ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater .. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)~ Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. t ^ ,} BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ^ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8 Yz X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ...-?. Idgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): ~' Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FO.R A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SiGNIFICAN -DELAY MAY . _..~ OCCUR. - - - - - --- -- - - - ~ E =~--~ ~ y'~ I - r in these re uirem nt n c the Cit Public Works Administration En ine~erin ~ a eta 7~7~~2=47~ If you have questions rega d g q e s, co tat y g ~ ,ep Gtm ) Q ~ ~ , MAY ~~ 12005 L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, a~i'uiowledge that all representations made in this application are true!and accurate to the st of my knowledge and authorize City r~esentatives to vi ' photograph the property described in tFj application. / ~> gnature of property owner or oRiciNAL _ NLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES t C I'v STATE OF FLORIbA,~000NTa(-OF~~~~~L__~__w__AT - t Sworn to nd subscribed before me this -C~~ay-.e~f A.D 20~ to me and/or by ho is personally known has produced as t lic, My c mission fires: TIFFANY 1. WALKE 1246 sr~A E of EY~IRES 10NE t 1, 2Q06 - FLOR7QA 3gNE3Ep THROUGH - RU INSURANCE COMPANY Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater ~~; ~ ~~~~ RIGINAL AFFIDAVIT T0~4UTHORIZE AGENT: ~ (Names of all property owners on deed -please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ~~ d ~1~~ (lie, ~' ~,e.~w ~.~n ~ 337 V1 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: `~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ 1{'o~ns ~ ~~ as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ~,f Property Owner !` Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this I ZO~ personally appeared :s and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/sfie signe ROSEMARY Q LAVALIERE My Commission Expires: NO~ry. Oif 1~1~Y11 ~~y CanMeUNOR-l.~M MPt 30, 2006.. G8 ~ day of who having been first duly sworn ~. Public r-'-' .~. ... ------- -_. --~ ---- _------~ r develo ment a lication residential intll 2 05.d ca ~i ~ ~ L.7 S:\Planning DepartmentWpplication Forms\development review\flexible stands d p pP , ~ ~ \~/ `' MAY „ 12005 ------ ~, pIANNIPJG & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Page 7 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 20Q5-City of C~'a"r~C4 ia~r CLEARWATER ~j L__ - - ~~c. $~4~os FLS2005-05037 840 ELDORADO AVE Date Received: 05/31/2005 p t±~ l~ U v EHRLICH, DAVID ~'~'~ ~~ ~ 2005 ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR LAND USE: RU ATLAS PAGE: 249A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet Aug. 05 2005 11:00AM YOUR LOGO City0fGlearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94477701 Aug. 05 10:59AM 01'01 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-8H0-HELP-FA}C C435-73291. * ~ RE: 840 Eldorado Dr. ,Clearwater Fl Questions from planning: 1. Provide an estimate of the value for the entire project: Project cost is estimated at 17, 000 dollars. 2. Clarify. How are the setback reductions in harmony with the chazacter of adjacent properties? Address the front and the side separately. Front: The variance for the front setbacks will allow this property to have an entry, porch system that is appropriate and consistent with the quality of homes being renovated and built on the current beachfront. Side: Porches existing and new will be upgrade this dwelling much more the project costs and will be on standard compared to adjacent properties as compared to substandard which it is at this time. 3. Staff understands that the request is for cosmetic improvements but, how will the reduced setbacks not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood? The proposed decks and trellis will conform or exceed current SBCC code. No existing landscape will be demolished to perform this project. New porches and stairs will comply with current code. Existing stairs at rear and front do not conform. 4. Clarify. How is the proposed complete remodel designed to minimize traffic congestion? A 2 car garage was added in place of the single car. The existing front easement area, sidewalk and property on the east side of residence is all existing concrete. Areas in front of proposed decks will be landscaped and accessible areas between structure and easement will be landscaped which will eliminate some of the easement parking that exists now. 5. Clarify. How are the reduced setbacks consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? It is apparent upon casual inspection of surrounding properties that many dwellings were designed with architectural appeal in mind rather than conforming with setbacks. The property directly south appears to be even less conforming than 840 Eldorado and an apparently new dwelling to the north appears similar to our existing ISR percentages. 6. Clarify. Residentional Infill Criteria #1 -How the proposed impractical without deviation from the setback requirements. You aze making the front setbacks less nonconforming? The sides exist and will remain consistent. Front setbacks: Deviation from the setback is a necessity in this case because existing front area is FULLY comprised of concrete. The approx ISR on the front of this property is more than 90% at this time. With the deviation that include the front porches and trellis we should be able to remove parts of the existing hardscape at the front install landscape and make this area less non-conforming. The side setbacks are existing and no part of the trellis shown will exceed existing 7. Clarify. Residential infill criteria #6 -staff believes the pro posed will enhance more than just the surrounding properties. It will most likely enhance the entire city as a whole. Owner and agents involved in this project agree with staff. This structure was called by many an eyesore by others before these improvements began and because of the location (directly on the beach) the improvements should greatly enhance the north beach neighborhood. Also, one obvious advantage to the city will be the increased tax based revenues. .~- ~ , CITY OF CLEAI~~VATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 August 02, 2005 BLANKENSHIP, SCOTT 234 DOLPHIN PT #1 LARGO FL 33770 RE: FLS2005-05037 LOCATED AT 840 ELDORADO AVE - EHRLICH, DAVID Dear SCOTT BLANKENSHIP: The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee (PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLS2005-05037. These comments are generated early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting on August 4, 2005. Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that maybe generated at the DRC meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting. If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582. Sincerely, ~1 John Schodtler Planner I Cc: File Case Number: FLS2005-050'~T-- 840 ELDORA~O AVE • 9:50 am Owner(s): David Ehrlich 234 Dolphin Point # 1 Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Scott Blankenship 234 Dolphin Pt #1 Largo, FI 33770 TELEPHONE: 727-647-600]., FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 0.1.4 acres located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 120 feet south of Gardenia Street. Atlas Page: 249A Zoning District: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Standard Development to construct an addition to an existing single family residence including a front (east) setback from 25 feet to 7.0 feet (to open porch), a side (south) setback from 5.0 feet to 2.5 feet (to open porches) ,per Section 2-203.B. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Carlouel Homeowners Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 976 Narcissus Avenue TELEPHONE: 727-446-0564, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1) Under no circumstances shall any structure be constructed within the 5 foot easement. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . No issues. Landscaping: 1 . That there be two groups of at least three palms placed in the front yard. Sable, Queen, or Washingtonia palms are acceptable. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues -addition of front porch to existing single family residence Stormwater: 1 . No Issues Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . No issues. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 4, 2005 -Page 9 Planning: ~ • 1 . Provide an estimate of the value of the entire project. 2 . Clarify. How are the setback reductions in harmony with the character of adjacent properties? Address the side and front seperately. 3 . Staff understands that the request is for cosmetic improvements but, How will the reduced setbacks not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing in the neighborhood? 4 . Clarify. How is the proposed complete remodel designed to minimize traffic congestion? suggestion: A new two car garage with no parking over the sidewalk? . 5 . Clarify. How are the reduced setbacks consistent with. the community character of the immediate vicinity? 6 . Clarify. Residential Infill Criteria #1 -How is the proposed impractical without deviation from the setback requirements. You are making the front setbacks less non-conforming? The sides exists and will remain consistent? 7 . Clarify. Residential Infill Criteria #6 -staff believes the proposed will enhance more than just the surrounding properties. It will most likely enhance the entire City as a whole. Other: No Comments Notes: Sufficient with comments addressed. Resubmit two sets of revisions prior to August 22, 2005. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 4, 2005 -Page l 0 ~ ..' ~ F' Aug. 02 2005 10:19AM YOUR LOGO City0fClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94477701 Aug. 02 10:18AM 01'06 SND 03 OK TO TURN DFF REPORT, PRESS ' h1B~RJ' tt04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). 4 J vS ~ ~ 12.01 am Case Number: FLS2005-05037 -- 840 ELDORADO AVE Owner(s): David Ehrlich 234 Dolphin Point # 1 Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Scott Blankenship 234 Dolphin Pt #I Largo, Fl 33770 TELEPHONE: 727-647-600], FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 0.15 acres located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 120 feet south of Gardenia Street. Atlas Page: 249A Zoning District: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Standard Development to construct an addition to an existing single family residence including a front (east) setback from 25 feet to 7.0 feet (to open porch), a side (south) setback from 5.0 feet to 2.5 feet (to open porches) ,per Section 2-203.B. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Carlouel Homeowners Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 976 Narcissus Avenue TELEPHONE: 727-446-0564, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2] 68, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1) Under no circumstances shall any structure be constructed within the 5 foot easement. Environmental: ~Z~ O l l1 12- t L~ 1 ~~ ~~~ G6v~-~L 1 . No Issues Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 , No issues -addition of front porch to existing single family residence Stormwater: No Comments Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: (, No issues. Planning: No Comments Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 4, 2005 -Page 5 /~~ Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. ~L~ ~~5~° ~~~ ~'1 Location: ~~~ ~ ~ ~G~G~C~(^ i ^ Current Use: ~ od~c~~ ~(~ ~ Meeting Date: { ^ Active Code Enforcement Case yes: ^ Address number (yes) ° (vacant land) ^ Landscaping (yes) (moo ^ Overgrown (yes) n~j) ^ Debris (yes) `nom) ^ Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) nom) ^ Building(s) oo (1~2f~ (poor) (vacant land) ^ Fencing ( ne (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ^ Paint oo ') (fair) (poor) (garish) o Grass Parking (yes) ~' o Residential Parking Violations (yes) no o Signage on) (ok) (not ok) (billboard) o Parking n%a (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) ~ Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) ~~tl ^ Outdoor storage _ es (no) C;nmmPnts/Status Rennrt (attach anv pertinent documentsl: Date: ~ c~5 Reviewed by: ~~'~L~~'.~ Telephone: ~ o~ Revised 29-01; 02-04-03 ' SCIPIONE, CLAUDIO 822 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1312 SUAREZ, JOSEPH S THE SUAREZ, RHONDA L THE 834 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1309 RUSSELL, SHELDON P RUSSELL, ING B 1775 LEXINGTON AVE S APT 32 SAINT PAUL MN 55118 - 3629 RAMOS, DAVID I KEARNS-RAMOS, VIlZGINIA 851 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1202 STRATIGEAS, NTINA 850 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1203 RICHARDSON, JOHN RICHARDSON, CHRISTINA R 840 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1309 BRONSON, JAMES C 407 PUEBLO TRL LAKELAND FL 33803 - 2149 ISAACSON, CORY ISAACSON, KIM 14650 IRVING ST BROOMFIELD CO 80020 - Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Doug Williams POBox 8204 Clearwater, F133758 ~L ~ ~ ~0~ 3 •BURRELL, C EVERETT PO BOX 3593 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8593 EHRLICH, DAVID 234 DOLPHIN POINT # 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 21 10 SHERMAN, THOMAS C SHERMAN, KATHLEEN M 850 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MUELLER, THOMAS MUELLER, KIRSTEN C 855 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1202 GEORGE, ALLEN A GEORGE, MELIA S 831 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 1311 WITHERS, JOHN W PO BOX 24895 LEXINGTON KY 40524 - 4895 ANGO, CAROLYN B 836 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1327 DAVIS, MICHAEL P DAVIS, LOIS B 827 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1310 FLS2005-0037 ~/~1/S MEARS, BARRY L 832 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1309 BOOS, DAVID M BOOS, KATHY M 844 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3919 K:ARNES, DONALD K KARNES, TERRI L 856 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1240 MORGAN, DAVID G GORDON, MARCIA 854 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1203 GOC, NICOLE F 839 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1311 RAFFAELE, PATRICK M RAFFAELE, WILDRED 848 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1327 NAY, NORMA H CHIAPPETTA, LAUREL M 83.0 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1327 SIKORSKI, JOSEPHINE M 826 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1324 • LL CITY OF CLEARWATER o ~~~a,~~r PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM July 21, 2005 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 840 ELDORADO AVE (FLS2005-05037) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 840 ELDORADO AVE, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development to construct an addition to an existing single family residence including a front (east) setback from 25 feet to 7.0 feet (to open porch), a side (south) setback from 5.0 feet to 2.5 feet (to open porches) ,per Section 2-203.B.. On August 04, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be August 04, 2005. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-562-4547 or John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on August 04, 2005. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner I Letter of Notification - FLS2005-05037 - 840 ELDORADO AVE Site address: 840 Eldorado Ave. Storm water Plan L _I ORIGINAL Original structure remains and is being updated cosmetically . Not storm water plan should be necessary. Tree Survey No tree survey is provided due to the fact there are no trees on the property or within 25' adjacent to this property. :' j~ ~u~ , ~ zao~ o ~`~~ _~ ~ar~ater U July 12, 2005 Scott Blankenship 234 Dolphin Pt #1 Largo, F133770 CITY ®F CLE~RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW ATER. C OM RE: FLS2005-05037 -- 840 ELDORADO AVE -- Letter of Completeness Dear Scott Blankenship The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-05037. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Comulete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 04, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, GJ "+'"~ John Schodtler Planner I Letter of Completeness - FLS2005-05037 - 840 ELDOR,4D0 AVE f~ wt F { Jul. 12 2005 03:15PM YDUR LOGO CityOFClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94477701 Ju1.12 03:14PM 00'44 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS ' MBW.1' #84. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-S00-FOP-FAX C435-73291. °Clearwater July 06, 2005 Scott Blankenship 234 Dolphin Pt #1 Largo, Fl 33770 CITY OF CLE~RWATER - ~~LANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW ATER. C OM RE: FLS2005-05037 -- 840 ELDORADO AVE -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Scott Blankenship The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-05037. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Acknowledgement of stormwater plan not completed. See page 4, section E of the application. 2. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study not completed. See page 6, section K of the application. 3. Provide a location map of the subj ect property. 4. Provide a Tree survey as required on page 4, section F of the application. 5. Provide a site plan and site data table as required per section G on pages 4 & 5 of the application. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Tuesday, July 12, 2005 (2:00 p.m.) If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours~~ _;~p '_~'~.TL~~ John Schodtler Planner I Letter ofIncompleteness - FLS2005-05037 - 840 EZDOR,4D0 AVE ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Ju 1. 06 2005 08 : 23AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94477701 Ju1.06 08:22AM 00'44 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRFSS ' I"E~JU' #t04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-~-FOP-FA}{ C435-73291. .a,~c 8/~ FLS2005-05037 840 ELDORADO AVE Date Received: 05/31/2005 EHRLICH, DAVID EEI!/F MAY 31"2005 MANNING ®EPART~iiENT CITY ~JF ~~.EARHIA~'ER ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR. LAND USE: RU ATLAS PAGE: 249A PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS :~_ _~ CLW CoverSheet Planning Department ~ C~ear~Vater 100 South Myrtle Avenue ` > 1 nI a ` Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 ~ Fax:727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) coNated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: '~ NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: •D W y ~~' ~Y~-` ~ MAILING ADDRESS: ~ 3~ ~JO~ QVIL W ~~ PHONE NUMBER: ~ 2, ' 4 ~ ~ - a ~ ~ ~ FAX NUMBER: ~~.1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 7 0 PROPERTY OWNER(S): V ~"V ~~ ~~'~ l L~ (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: ~C.O y1 ~~~~_t1~ ~'~1~~ MAILING ADDRESS: "Z 3 ~ ~O'~~IW ~[" ~ ' PHONE NUMBER: ~ Z7 - ~~ 1 - t0 ~~ ~ FAX NUMBER: ~ Z7 ' ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ CELL NUMBER: ~bn NL E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) 0 ~0 ~ ~ ~~~'r°t'fl ~ ~!° Nv" ~ b i ject s te: STREET ADDRESS of su LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lb ` ~~ OCR ~0 -q~N D IR ~ IA- VV ~p A 5 (if not listed heCre, please note the location of this document in the submittal) I t PARCEL NUMBER: O V - 9 - ~S 4 Ob~o - ~O 3 O i'; PARCEL SIZE: ~0 S ~ t " ~Y ~ i 2~D5 (acres, square feet) ~ PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): ~ (N~I~ ~i9'YVl t ~y ~QS l OP,~C.t~ P-i.~~r-~N ll~ ~ ()~tt€L~P~.~o (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) ~CA1h-CES ~~~C'TY OF CLEARWATER DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): RD~I}~oa O~ F>~~~ A~cac.Mes 0.,+ Nbai•+~ t SOV•Wt gtOt Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all rgquested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parkin g spaces, specific use, etc.) of ~~~w gN~ R~0 ~~~~•~.~ AFP ~( >2~u~~ec~ ~~ aP c,lL ~. ~~~I i I Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PRE)H'bUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO/ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable ~ documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ^ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. ~-- Q stw~~l stn ~.,~ g{.~~-~ ~R uA~l•~ ~r~.Pn~••evh~.^A~ Fine }+' ~ c ~` Lk~s~~ ~~s~~/1'~, ~w ~/V~If3uNC~wh ~\ft.J~~S w~~ ~ rip l ~c~ k. ~n,e rA~s ~ w- t ~+ ~ w~+ ~ ~ AK D S cr-~e 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. i T Irt, ~s~ beea r ~ 0 ~s ~ pis-gyp-- A-~- o ~. r?~q n.w-r~s w i U ~ p , O IN (nom ~ Win rA~ti t~ s u .n.n o y vet p ~vh P no~Q.~n.{~ ~s , Lr4~ ru G~L . . 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or per1sons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. ~nOAose-c~ DPGf~-5 l~0 'uA'~' ~ ~Ge,et1 ^LK ~S~+w~n `3{'wy L~~-~'-~S ~ 1, un.e.~. S t, o~ S f~0 ~ r r75 Nn~.~ c • ~ P n a ~cvw~..~~5 0Y+ ~ y 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. .~ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Th ese. rKO~ ~ ~ ~~#~ ~s U ~ tl ~ru In ~c-t. et ~3E~,,- c~1CU wt. ~,~' w r95 iu0 ~- ~~ art OJs 1 K ~ ~ ~S'~M.~' W f~t 3 Uw ~/l.Ov/-i 0 ~ 3 ~-R.~Ic~ ~S 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. No ~ ~ ~3 w ~U~ 1~e 1'Las~}x ~ ~ ~ UL ~ ~'~`~S ~,' Ve4'~ Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater O 1. 'Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. 1 p "'~1~ N'LtG~.dov.~i~c 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) hll,sd~,r v~t~~. w ~U1~~8'~ w ~aM ~hoo~~ ~'t~t"h~~' L~ l5'~'+~- V 4~1it ~ • ~e IM ~t"^P+~Ore, Mew y l~"1yQ ~ • ~ - Z IM 3. The uses within t~h"eresidential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. t "~t~+e ~ nof~sP.~ Afll~,~-v~.S R('Le. P~^-~- C°_X+Ie~S~e~.S •~A-f A,~w n~o~- • w~U ~~ h~+~~ ~-Ge~S tc~ s~w~,o~,Now~ ~~pe~.~,c~ 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. l uti 0 ino ve,w~e,~.~f 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ~, t6 t„5 ~ LGl `f,DS S~4y-uc~, •~-~k- oa 4b1 (ae C'~~ ~•'+~c-~ ~J ~~ly LJy '~Me~e, t}pc r~,rt-i~ ~ 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. '~. 4S s ~w W u~1 Ow 1^,~ C~w1n~0wt~.. Sv~Fi~w~v~ D~~oew ~. ~S 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ~C,~- ~ cs~t Invu~ tS ~l-1 ~~ N~ . Ce~~u uwf., A-wP ao~.s w ~I,) N a E- ~~ ~~ A~s~ Inoc~a, As See~- ~ --~1 ~.,~ Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol~ addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance wil the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemptic to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall rowded. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ All dimensions; _ North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _ Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index#701}; _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ^ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _ Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ^ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) and color rendering if possible; ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; _ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; _ Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11) (color rendering if possible); ^ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater AFFIDAVIT TO~UTHORJZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed -please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ~'~ o ~l ~~v~vc~ IA v~e_ - w A-~~n ~ 33 7 V~ 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: ~~ ~' ~~~ ~°'~~ ~' ~~ as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Property Owner Property Owner COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ~QU~ personally appeared Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed ROSEMARY d. LAVALIERE My Commission Expires: ~~ry Pts~C ~~YII'~~y Co11MMN~1M1 ttlMrs Mpt J0, 200d Public S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development reviewflexible standard development application residential infi112005.doc ~~ day of who having been first duly sworn Page 7 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater I. ~ BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ^ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 YZ X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8 '/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true<and accurate to the st of my knowledge and authorize City re~fesentatives to vi photograph the property described in thi~'application. / ~> day of A.D 20~ to me and/or by ho is ersonally known has produced as of property owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS 1 I „ Sworn to nd subscribed before me this (. t lic,- My c mission Tres: TIFFANY ! . WALKER 12d6 4 STATE'OF EXPIRCJ JUNE t 1, 2Qt)tl F~OHIOA 30NESEP THROUGH RU INSURANCE COMPANY Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater x~7: -~~ oU PONT Tyvek HomeWrap ,S~f~:~~„... ti' i ~_ ' 4v ~ ~ ~; v '` a3 ~: of r ~ , ~ ~ _ ~; .. _ _y.L. ~ ~' ~~ ~ ~lflov~+~ ice- l1 ~,n,ov~ ~- ~2.clf- I~Ov.~, S ~a e Z~ ~X~S~~ Cvv~.~e~ ~.~. 'De.c,tL Q lC a s' ~ ~i. ~' !S \~ r. z /' O _ a ~ _ 0 ~~ ,~o,Z~ V ~ ~w Z~ ~itgPos ~J ~o,~~- 'Dec,1L $ov~ S t ~2 . ~ . ~,~;~' ry ~ - 26 ~ X51 Rho ~~~ 1y~,~t.~~Qr Ypn _"~ iCa' 'r', ,~,:;~ _ o., ,'~~-__ _ ~Q,4~ y,~~_. ,~~`~ -~ ATER, ,~~ LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 5, 2005 Mr. Scott Blankenship 234 Dolphin Point, Unit #1 Largo, FL 33770 CI~'~' OF CLEARWA'TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (72~ 562-4576 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-05037 at 840 Eldorado Avenue Dear Mr. Blankenship: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On August 4, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to construct an addition to an existing single family residence including a front (east) setback from 25 feet to 7.0 feet (to open porch), a side (south) setback from 5.0 feet to 2.5 feet (to open porches), per Section 2-203.C. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Residential Infill criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That under no circumstances shall the new shed be constructed within the five-foot easement; and 2. That prior to Certificate of Occupancy, there be a minimum of two groups of at least three palms placed in the front yard. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received May 31, 2005. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (August 5, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that maybe required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or BRL1N ). AUNGS"1', 1VfAl'OR FRANK ~~IRB.4RD, VICE MAYOR HOYI' HAAIIL'fON, COLiNCII \iG\18LR BILL JONtiON, COUNCILbiGMH6R ® CARLRN A. PL"PCRtiCN, COUNCIL41Hp1HER ~~EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFfIRD1ATIVE ACTION EDIPLOYER~~ August 5, 2005 Blankenship -Page Two license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Pursuant to Section 4-502.A, an appeal maybe initiated within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to those surrounding property owners who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on October 4, 2004, (seven days from date of Development Order). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner I, at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, /~ _~--- ~ '" Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslEldorado 0840 (LMDR) JVSIFLS2005-05037 Development Order.doc i ~[._~~y9r r, ,. G ~~~~ _ .. ~ LQA ~- ~'ir: ~iitll~ LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 5, 2005 Mr. Scott Blankenship 234 Dolphin Point, Unit #1 Largo, FL 33770 ~I'I'Y OF ~IJEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4745, CLEARWATER~ FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-05037 at 840 Eldorado Avenue Dear Mr. Blankenship: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Conununity Development Code. On August 4, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to construct an addition to an existing single family residence including a front (east) setback from 25 feet to 7.0 feet (to open porch), a side (south) setback from 5.0 feet to 2.5 feet (to open porches), per Section 2-203.C. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Residential Infill criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That under no circumstances shall the new shed be constructed within the five-foot easement; and 2. That prior to Certificate of Occupancy, there be a minimum of two groups of at least three palms placed in the front yard. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received May 31, 2005. Pursuant to Section 4-303; an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (August 5, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that maybe required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or BRIAN J. AUNGS"I, MAYOR FRANK EIIHBARD, VICE MAYOR HOPI' HA:~'II000N, COUNCIL ~tE~iftER BILL JONSON, COUNCILD4LMBGR CAREEN A. PL-TERSEN, COUNCIL~tE~fBER ~~EQUAL E~9PLOYMEN"l' AND AFPIKDIATIVE ACTION EMI'LOYEK~~ August 5, 2005 Blankenship -Page Two license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Pursuant to Section 4-502.A, an appeal maybe initiated within seven days of the date the Development Order is 'issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to those surrounding property owners who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on October 4, 2004, (seven days from date of Development Order). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner I, at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, _~- ~-- Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BlFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslEldorado 0840 (LMDR) JVSIFLS2005-05037 Development Order.doc ~,~ -\~- -_~ ~0 ~~ ,~ ~ A7'ER, ~~ LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 5, 2005 Mr. Scott Blankenship 234 Dolphin Point, Unit #1 Largo, FL 33770 CITY O~ ~LEAR~A'TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-05037 at 840 Eldorado Avenue Dear Mr. Blankenship: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On August 4, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to construct an addition to an existing single family residence including a front (east) setback from 25 feet to 7.0 feet (to open porch), a side (south) setback from 5.0 feet to 2.5 feet (to open porches), per Section 2-203.C. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Residential Infill criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That under no circumstances shall the new shed be constructed within the five-foot easement; and 2. That prior to Certificate of Occupancy, there be a minimum of two groups of at least three palms placed in the front yard. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received May 31, 2005. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an .application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (August 5, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that maybe required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or BRIAN J. AUNGSI', MAYOR FRANK FIIR8,4RI), VICE MAYOR HOY`I' HA.4fIL'CON, COUNCIL:~1L\1HCR BILI. JONtiON, COUNCILD4CAfI3LR ® CARLGN A. PG'I'CRtiGN, COUNCIL'~IE~IHGR ~~EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE AC'T'ION EMPLOYEK~~ August 5, 2005 Blankenship -Page Two license. affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Pursuant to Section 4-502.A, an appeal maybe initiated within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to those surrounding property owners who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on October 4, 2004, (seven days from date of Development Order). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner I, at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslEldorado 0840 (LMDR) JVSIFLS2005-05037 Development Order.doc 1~) ~~~~r,b`~~ a, ~~'gTER`~-+`~~ ~~iot~/ LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 5, 2005 Mr. Scott Blankenship 234 Dolphin Point, Unit #1 Largo, FL 33770 CI~'~ ®F CLEAR~AT'~R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER~ FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-05037 at 840 Eldorado Avenue Dear Mr. Blankenship: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On August 4, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to construct an addition to an existing single family residence including a front (east) setback from 25 feet to 7.0 feet (to open porch), a side (south) setback from 5.0 feet to 2.5 feet (to open porches), per Section 2-203.C. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Residential Infill criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That under no circumstances shall the new shed be constructed within the five-foot easement; and 2. That prior to Certificate of Occupancy, there be a minimum of two groups of at least three palms placed in the front yard. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received May 31, 2005. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (August 5, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that maybe required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or BRIAN j. AUNGS'I', MAYOR FRANK EIIRHARD, VI(.1: MAYOR HOYr HAA11L"PON, COLiNCtI~(G\(B[R BILL JONtiON, COUNCILD4t_bIHLk ® CARLCN A. PLTGR$LN, COUNCIL~(8a(BLR ~~EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFPIkDMYI~IVE ACTION EMPLOYEk~~ August 5, 2005 Blankenship -Page Two license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Pursuant to Section. 4-502.A, an appeal maybe initiated within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to those- surrounding property owners who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on October 4, 2004, (seven days from date of Development Order). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner I, at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, __...---~ J ..- Michael Delk, AICP J Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslEldorado 0840 (LMDR) JYSIFLS2005-05037 Development Order.doc ~/at~ r AL'° ~ ~ ._--- ~_ LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 5, 2005 CITE OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 Mr. Scott Blankenship 234 Dolphin Point, Unit #1 Largo, FL 33770 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-05037 at 840 Eldorado Avenue Dear Mr. Blankenship: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On August 4, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to construct an addition to an existing single family residence including a front (east) setback from 25 feet to 7.0 feet (to open porch), a side (south) setback from 5:0 feet to 2.5 feet (to open porches), per Section 2-203.C. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Residential Infill criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That under no circumstances shall the new shed be constructed within the five-foot easement; and 2. That prior to Certificate of Occupancy, there be a minimum of two groups of at least three palms placed in the front yard. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received May 31, 2005. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (August 5, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that maybe required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or BRIAN 1. AUNG$'f, MAYOR FRANK HBHARI), VICE MAYOR HOY"1' HA:\4IL"1'ON, COUNCII_~fG\16CR BILLJONtiON, COUNCILMEMHER ® CAREEN A. PC"IGRSEN, COUNCIL\iC\1HGR ~~EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIKI`1A'TIVE ACTION EAIPLOYER~~ August 5, 2005 Blankenship -Page Two license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Pursuant to Section 4-502.A, an appeal maybe initiated within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to those surrounding property owners who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on October 4, 2004, (seven days from date of Development Order). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner I, at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslEldorado 0840 (LMDR) JVSIFLS2005-05037 Development Order.doc Back Lc+~at~ __ Heq~.' . Exit ~' (~~ `-~ ~{ ~~~Y.t,+, \ J ~~ ~*, ~_ s `~•, ~k' :: ~~< fir',; ,~ P L ~a cats Results ~~ ~1, Aclelress 840 ELDORADO AVE~ ~cnre 75 2 -~ 1013 ELDORADO ~ _ ._._ ~2 _~W_ .__..~_....__ Ww .w .._.. _, , . ~. ~. Z~ I I 1 i E t ~ ry._ .r.s -r ~.r. L'~ ~n~,e~ ~'l~~r~~-~~ter ~niY~` +. • ~8g~MlN~ « " : • L~i]I~CS ' 'F~~I'A * a • • ~ ; + • * Visible Arctioe ^ • ~ • ` ~ Parcel • .. • • r i • • ~ '~±~ MOR xrpc.rlvc Inforrr~ation + r ' ~lPt~rr~t~ r ~'`; Streets • f• • ' + ~ ` + ~`'~ Parcels i r ` + " ~ • .....+ _ ' • • ~ ~ ' ~~ ~ ~''~ Future Land Use ~ ` ~- + • '. ,~ * ~~~ ~"'~ Zoning ~ ~ ; ~' E11 + ^ ; ~ fY r * ~ . + ~ . ~«''_ • ; + ` ~ ~ ~"'^ Pinellas County • ~ + + ~;: ' ~ ~ , ,, (~ Aenal Photo w w '~' r P I~r r i ~ * .wn • . ~ ' ~~` LMDt~ ' t~SfR + a ~ • • r Refresh klap Aihamatically • t * * ^ ~' • ^ ~ • + ~ ~ • ~ # ~ ~ 'J~iYFl~TfA __, ~ ~ • • • IJII ^ • ~ a • ~ ,+ ~ + ~ • ~ +. • , ~ t ~, ~ hVINGC} -tt Legend `~ _^ ^ ~ y.'~ ' ~~ ~ 1 ^ • • 9'srtrets . + / ~'~ a 4 Extl~t: ~I~- _ r~~~~: f~ „. . , ~ :. Click on a number to locate the address on the map.Then T press ~ on the toolbar. Click on the marked parcel to see Parcel ~ ~' and Flood Hazard Information. ^ °' ~,~, ~ Scale; 1,5,617 _.ma ._ ~ Naap; 2.,t1J5C,ia~ _._®_~ 1 _~1C~O,F~ -- In~~ge: .r _ C,i i - - - _.. -_ _ --- - i `~ Lr~cal intraneC s ~~ __ - ~' ; i~; 5tart ~ i" ~ ~ »`~ Ctit'! _ , =~Cir ~r i I~arwater GIS A ~ _ ~ p,,, -- ~ Clearwater 2onin Mi q ~~ p ~ ('y7 __ _ ~,~ _ `/ ,~d~ +8 10 Ah~l . r ~- 1 +~~~y - ~ ~~..~-.._.___~-~l..~l.A L ~~ ~J ~il l1 ~~~~ ~ ~ //////~~~~ r _ ...,>. HomeWrap NQmeWrap e ~ i'v+ ~/ L~ -~-.: ~ ` { ~, _ Q cl I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT . _ \ ~ `~ I I1~ ..._4~ ~ ~•.: ~~~ 1 1 \8~I rl/~',r ,.. `..-w ~' - _ - ~ ~ _ ® .a '~4. ~ 'ill `:.!.-_/_.-- ' :~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~' 1 ' c~ a ~. ~~ . ~p~~ d i 0~"" O .a~= v .,_ ~ ti ~ ~~ ._ _. .T... ..... .. - _ - ` 4 ;,~ ~~Y Y I.T l ~ 6 _ ,~ f ~ f~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ M ~~; tj~1 `,,; ~ + N _ ~ y....+.` 'R.yr ~ ~ A ~,- - !. , - ' ~ , ., ... . - ~ ... ~ 7 .y, ._ 1~`~~ .. ~'-i.. t ~'` - '.~~ '. ~~ .~ . ~ ~~ ~'~ .. - --i-- - - - ---- r _._. ORIGINAL 1~ ~,o,Z~, v-~w ~1.. I ~~~~~ .. :~D - ~ . ; MAY 3 12005 ~ < < p~gNNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATE___ R__~,___! Z~ ~~IP°s ~~ ~'ro~~' 'De G.1~ Sov~ S ~ 1~'2 REVISIONS I 1 ~~ N r.._.._.._ Ild i 1 i i 0 :' ~:,~: ±~ ~ ~ ,~ ~',~' ., ONE STORY4B.S. l03'B1flCOREt:~9.31' ~ fAGGE ftOgtELT i i i.` , : i i LEGAL: .. . . LOT 3, BLOCK6 MANDAIAY ~ 3d R SUBDINSION, ACCORDING TO THE PIAd THEREOF AB RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGES 32 THROUGH 35, OFTHE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELIA$ COUNTY, FLORIDA. T FLORIDA STRUCTURAL LOAD LIMITATIONS (FBC • 2oa1 say. Idoe.l.n FLOORLIVELOAD: 40 PSF 30 PSF SLEEPING ROOMS 80 PSF CORRIDORS ROOF LIVE LOAD: 20 PSF ROOF SNOW LOAD: NOT APPLICABLE WBJD LOAD: I. BASIC WATD SPEED = 130 MPH (7 SEC. GUST) 2. BUILDING CATEGORY = B (ASCE b96)WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR,Iw= 1 3. WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY C 4.ENCLOSURECLASSB'[CATION: ENCLOSED INFERNAL PRESSURECOEFFICB':1VT= +/. 0,18 5. COMPONENT & CLADDING ROOF: (LOSE) ForR00FANGLE= 10T030DEGREES H = O TO 30 FEET P roof = ZONE 1= 21.3 •33.8 ZONE2= 21.3 -7L3 = 7-'IT7- OVERHANGZANE2= 68.8 OVERHANG 2ANE3= -115.7 wALL:(wB~roow & Dooas) pasF) P wall = ZONE 4 = 36.9 -00.0 ZONES= 36.9 -09.4 THIS BUB.DING IS NOT DESIGNED FOR PLACEMQ4T ON THE UPPER HALF OF A HB.L OR ESCARPNfENT EXCEEDTNG 15 FEET M HEIGHT. sEISMICI.oAD: xorAPPIacABLE SOB. BEARING PRESSURE: 2,000 PSF CODES 2001 Florida Building Code 2001 Florida Building Code -Mechanical 2001 Florida Building Code -Plumbing 2001 Florida Building Code -Fuel Gas 2004 Florida Fire Prevenlldn Cade 2003 NFPA 1-UnBOrm Flre Code 2003 NFPA 101 LHe Safety Cade 2002 NEC -National Electric Code (NFPA 70) Cansfrudion: TypeVl-unprotected Occupancy: R3 Residential Occupant Load: 1 person per200 SF CONCRETE NOTES: I i >I a~ of ~I O~ J~ w~ I i i I ENCLOSED STRUCTURE NOTES: A PLYWOOD PANEL A5 PER SECTION (606.1.4 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE MUST BE MADE FOR EACH NEW WINDOW AND STORED ON SITE. THE PLYWOOD PANEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOtMNG MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: MINIMUM THICKNESS: 711 G° MAKIMUM SPAN: 8' PANELS SHALL BE PRECUT TO COVERTHE GIA2ED OPENINGS WITH ATTACHMENT HARDWARE PROVIDED AND MARKED W/ DESIGNATION FOR EACH WINDOW 2 112° k 6 WOOD SCRLW5 WRH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF I G°. WHERE SCREN5 ARE ATTACHED TO MP50NRY OR MASONRY! STUCCO, THEY SHALL BE ATTACHED USING VIBRATION-RESISTANT ANCHORS HAVING A MINIMUM WITHDRAWAL CAPACITY OF 490 LB. DOORS MUST BE EQUALLY PROTECTED UNLESS ENGINEERED FOR WIND LOADS, INCIUDING_FRENCH DOORS. -. _ fL00R STAB OP PIAM MIX CONCRETE 3000 P.S.1.4' THICK WfRt FIBER MESH REINFORCEMENT OR 6X6 10110 GAUGE REINFORCING MAT. OVER TERMITE TREATED SOIL WITH 6 MIL POLYETHYLENE VAPOR BARRIER OVER COMPACTED CLEAN FILL. CONCRETE SPECS: SLAB- 3000 P.S.I. IN 28 DAYS f00TING$- 3000 PS.I. IN 28 DAYS 840 EL DORADO FRONT # REAR PORCH RENOVATION SQUARE FOOTAGES: EXPANDED DECKS: 261 50. FT. EXIST. DECKS: 593 S0. FT. TOTAL DECKS: 854 S0. Fi. p ~(~C~pd~ MAY 182816 INDEX °~' SHEET SUBJECT I COVER SHEET, SITE PLAN 2 FRONT PORCH RENOVATION 3 BACK PORCH RENOVATION COVER SHEET N O N Z~ N Q 3 J ~ ~ mN < r ~ ~' o " J ~ o C W ~] Z H N V Q w ° 3 ~ 1- ~~a _ `~ v V N ~ C Q DE`NGN <DRAPNNG BY: W a W Q a F ~ W M W ~ F v1 a w ~, 0 ~ z~ x e ~ W : ~ / d 3 a 3 ~' .` Y ; 0 Q ~ I.I., a ~ N ~ co ~ m U ~ N LLI ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ U ~ ~ Z o m Qm mo um 3N ~0 a'- O .~~ ~~ - v - ~~ al: o Q ~ W 3 N o! ~'°Fan 0 V N U ~ ~ L 0 N N N O. w Ar e CHECKED BY: W ~ aRAYM BY: QQ m ~~~N DATE: 0 ~ . 9MA4N RaascT ¢L NUMBER: 5i ~ Ip ~ ~ 6HEE7 DOoj¢ NUMBER: ~ ~ W O E I WNf I OF£paQU vMVMez~E ~W•1 WN A EXIST. BEDROOM EXIST. BEDROOM IXIST. WING - GARAGE n o I I(4° ' 4"CONC. SLAB j ," p 0 _ , . 4" CONC. STAB 0 0 IXIST. CONC. FORCH TO REMAIN i , ~ C 4 C 0 THICKEN SL48 Ai CORNERS FOR ~_' °----'-------°-"-'---"---'-'--°- 8X8X 16 CMU W! (I) k5 ROD IN FILLED -- ~ °---- - •-------- ------------- ' \ \ 14° ' OTING W k POST ANCHOR BOLTS (SEE DETAIL) CELLS AS INDICATED. TOP COURSE SHALL BE FlLLED K.O. BLOCK ~-"- ----' "• " FO / (3) X 20 5 CONTINUOUS ROD. DOWEL INTO IXIST. FOOTING WI6" MIN. 12" THICK FOOTING UNDER EMBEDMENT. NEW STEPS. DOWEL INTO IXIST. FOOTING W/ 12° #5 ROD62'O.C. FOUNDATION PLAN 3 TREADS ~~ ~p "a~ N N p_ I'-I IR' N STAIR DETAIL SCALE: ~" = I'-0° 4x6 POST B„ 5• 3 COURSES OF 51MP. ABU46 POST BASE 8X8X 16 CMU 4" CONC. STAB. ~~ " r+~ N EXIST CONC STAB . ~~! I I~==" CLEAN, COMPACTED TERMITE , I ~ , - ' . N ~ , I _'._.. TRFATED FILL ~ II.: ': ~r '~ '' _ ' ~~ ~ .~ § (I)k5 ROD IN CORNER BLOCKS TI, =ill= I~ Ii '~~ - ANDA5INDICATEDON FOUNDATION PLAN. '. -; 12° 95 ROD W/ 6" EMBEDMENT '~ ~ it - (3) BS COMINUOUS ROD W/ INiO IXIST. SLAB I'-S" 25" MIN. OVERLAP. MAINTAIN MIN. 3° CIEARANLE FROM BOTTOM 4 EDGE OF f00TING. FOOTING SECTION SCALE: Yz" = I'•0° 4 Vz" MAX. SPACING 4X6 8&VM W/ lCE4 C EXIST. BEDROOM 5070 FR DR 3'•9 I /A" 4X6 POST W! SIMP. I ~_ ABU46 POST 80.5E I iD I'-6 `'" REMWE IXIST. WADS " ~ ` FRONT PORCH PLAN SCALE: Va" = I'0." NEW DECORATIVE ARCH NEW 2X8DPEN RAfTEP5 n a n GUARDRAIL DETAIL 2X F~ IFlN SH~W/HARD E-TR1MJ SCALE: Vz" = I'-(Y FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: V4" = I'-0' EXIST. BEDROOM 5070 fR DR EXIST. UVING 6070 FR DR 12'- 13 /' EXIST. PORCH ROOF i ._°-- 8'•i 1314° lalo^ NEW CONC. CURVED STEPS IXIST. PORCH ROOF N IXIST. ROOF US46 FACE MOUNT (ANGER PROVIDE 2X IAILER IN WALL. 423 CUPS ONE ON BACK DF EACH 2X8 4X6 BEAM WI (2) 51MP. -CE4 OR EQUAL. GARAGE NEW 2X8 OPEN RAFTERS NEW DECORATIVE COLUMNS AROUND 4X6 POST 'NEW CONC. DECK ~ ~~~~t"i~(-'ii Mar~e2o~ ''' U DEVEIDPMBiT SEimICE$ DFPT CIIYOFC4FNM1NAT~ FRONT PORCH DESIGN NO GPP IN GUARD RAIL SHALL ALLOW a a• sPHERETO PASS mROUa+. Rfli510N5 N O N Z ~ N 4 3.J tt1 n ~ Q N m OQ% ~ ~ o " C J W o r N Q W ~ ~ ~ 3 V ~ '- _ ~ 7 U N C Q DESIGN 6 ORAFfING BY: w Q a F `~ ( ~ W e M MI ~ ~ M /r ~ a k" ~~ x ~ ~' S ~ z ~ ~ a 3 W z ~ ~ Q ¢ ~ 0 ~ a ~ U N ~ ~ ~ m U ~ ~ I.I.I ~, ~ f~ ~ ~ U Z ~ m Q ro m g r ~m g~ 0 - ~ .' ~ di lD - w v - ~ ~ Q r O Q 0' W 3 N K J ~F C 0 3am~d ro U p • Q N ' ` N \ O w SCALE' AS NOTED 9 MAY OS PROJECT NurmEa: 5246 SKEET /~ ~~ G ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE: V<' = I'-0° COLUMN DETAIL SCALE: Nz" = I'-(Y 4X6 BEAK LCf :E MOUNT movlDE 2x NALL. 5 ON BACK OF 30N FACH BEAM CUT BACK IXISTING STEPS TO THIS LINE. M W! (2) SIMP. .EQUAL. SOBBFROR ' `~ 12" A5 ROD EMBEDDED 6" ~`•1 INFO IXIST. STEP W/ HIGH " \ \" `.~ STRENGTH IXPOXY @ r O.C. ~ \ " \ ®,~ ~~ \~ I J L _ ` - \\. ~ \ 0 III CUf BACK IXISTING STEPS TO THIS LINE. BACK PORCH PLAN 4x6 P05T 9° 5' SIMP. ABU46 P05T BASE REBUILD ~~ WALL AT COLUMNS EXIST. 4' CONC. SLAB. AND POUR50UD NEW 5' LANDING ' ~ a ~i ~v . III -II N --1 , I- -_ 12' LONG fly ROD W/ 6" ; _ III ~I I I EMBEDMENT INf0 IXl5T. SLAB ~ , =:1 I ~..-: / EPOXY J - .. :. b -_- ~ ~ j EXIST. CONC SLAB - _ _ ;~ -- 111. -II _. __ ADD 'X ,P 3 3 AD I-=1I I ~ _ ~ ~ COLUMNS I'8" FOOTING SECTION SCALE: Vz" = I'-G' ( i f 41'•3" 5088 FR OR 36"HIGH RAILING 12"fly ROD EMBEDDED 6° IMO IXI5T. CONC. SLAB WI HIGH STRENGTH IXPOXY @ 2' O.C. CUT IXI5T. SLAB TO ALLOW FOR NEW FOOTER REMOVE IXI5T. FORM S SQUARE OFF COWMN S WALL ~ CORNER OF PORCH r ~ , I I ~ ... -.__.._......_ ................. ' ~f . I X12"%3'X3'PAO 2 TREADS I I°=P-10° I I" ~~ ~a= "a p~, ~ m n STAIR DETAIL CONC. SLAB W/ 7,5" RISER IXI5T. ROOF NEW 2X8 OPEN RAFTERS Q 16° O.C. NEW 4%8 BEAM ND GAP IN GUARD PJJL SH0.LL PllOY/ - A 4' SPHERE TO PA55THROUGH, "~ ~ ._... .:,~ ;a. ~ ~.. -~, ~ ,. ~ ..~. o-ax ~... sn x _ NEW2%80PEN F ~~.~ x,;,.. RAFTERS 4 Vz" MAX. SPACING _ R F~ rym~ ~{ N - IS~ISQULS = D N ~'- t b _ ~ ~. ~ ti MAY 1 B 20~ - GEYBAPMBJiSERVIC~OFPt pF CL€APo"lATER N GUARDRAIL DETAI L 2X FRAMING AROUND 4%6 P05T _ _ _ J _ _ _ J ~ ---J --- AND FlNLSH W! HARDIE-TRIM NEW CONC. STEPS W/ 5' V+NDING N SCALE: Vz" = I'-0° N NEW 3' X 3' X 12"CONC. FOOTER W/ (4J k5 RODS REAR ELEVATION ~"WAYS. BAC PORCH DESIGN K REVISIONS O N Z ~ N Q 3 J n ~ m N m Q ~ ~ ~ p N o C Q N ~ ~/ r W 2 µ~j N F 0 W ~ y ~ ~ ~ L 0 p _ - ~ U ~ N C Q D61GN <ORAFIING DI': a W A a a 0.1 W e v "' ~ F w u , ~ ~" ~ Ql Z r A N ,1+ QI o ~ W Fa 3 0 3 ~-. 0 ~ Q ~ Q S ~- ~ U N ~ l9 ~ m U ~ ~ W ,~ LL ~ f0 N U Z ~ m Q ro m o ~Q o m 3N ~0 °'- m ~ F- ~i 10 - w v - ~~ al: o Q V' LLl 3 N ~_ a ~ a ~ 0 ~ N U d ~ `a N \~ N " ~ O II__ a V) - ui c: SCALE AS NOTED CHECKED BV: WJM DRAWN BV: Randy Young DRTE 9 MAY 05 RRaecT NUMBER: 5246 6HEET NUMBER. 30F3 COLUMN DETAIL SCALE: Ve' = I'-(Y' I ~ HURRI-BOLT COUPUNG, NUT d SQUARE WASHER REMOVE IXISTING ROOF MATERIAL, NEW 3000 PSI CONC. REPLACE ANY ROTTED 1X6 SHEATHING. SAW CUT 24" OPENING IN LAY NEW 30 LB5 FELT f SHINGLES. IXIST. SLAB. N HURR7-BOLT NUT 6 = ~ m 50UARE WASHER m a O H9 TRUSS STRAP. CONNECT EXIST. ROOF 0 RAFTERS TO NEW EXTERIOR FRAMED WALL ? ~ 0 NEW ALUM. DRIP EDGE -_I I -'-I ~ _--~' .I ~ I-_ REPLACE AM' ROTTED SU6FASCIA "' '' _ I I ~ L i ~ ~-_- 0 ~,n-iii-.~~~- - ~ ~_-, _ _ RET'LACE ALUM. VEMEDSOfFlT f FASCIA. a ".~_ ` -_ ' I__I ' '-_I I I- = b ~~ -~~I I ~~~~1~ ' _~' Il - REPLACE VENTED 50FFlT AN D N ' I / ~I_-" - -- ANY ROTTED FURRING ~ ~ - ' ~ ~ .'. - Vz° HURR180LT @ 6' D.C. ~ a ~ - MAX 6 AS SHOWN ON PLAN ~ \ m 518" MIN. STUCCO OVER 12) COMINUOUS ff5 ROD I 30LB$ FELT d METAL IAFH W/3 Vz" CLEARANCE FROM ' SLOES AND BOTTOM EXIST. 2x4 FRAMING "CD%PLYWOOD IXIST. IxGSHEATHING ~ GARAGE FOOTING SECT 2x4 FRAMING @ I G° O.C. SCALE: 3/a" = I'-0" IX15T. PIASTER WALLS NURRJ-BOLT COUPLING, NUT f 50UARE WASHER IXIST. 2x4 PLATE NEW 2X4 PT FLATS 30 LBS FELT HURRI-BOLT EPO%T STUD EMBEDDED 6" INTO CONC. WI HIGH STRENGTH EPOXY. IXIST. 2 % 10 FLOOR JOIST (OR USE HURRI-BOLT WEDGE ANCHORI IXlsr. 2 x s PLATE IXIST. FELT :'b~:~ STEM WAILS REPAIR: CHIP OUT ANYCRACKED CONCRETE. ' ~. x' . CHEMICALLY TREAT RUSTED RfBAR TO REDUCE FUTURE EXIST. STEM WAIL ~` ~'- ~ ' ~ ~ • RUSTING, PALM REBAR'MTH A RUSTODUM TYPE PALM, '~ , ~ = THEN PATCH CONCRETE USING A CONC. ADHESIVE. IXIST. FOOTER ~`' : •, = III=I _ 1 III . ` ~ ~ ' III=I IXIST. CONC. DECK . - = III-III "; I=III=1 ~ ,,' ., ,': , '.,1.6xz~;.'. . ; ~ :II=III: '~~ III , I I=11 .I I I=I I I- 11.1=III=II I=1 L I=.. ELECTRICALIEGEND L• PIf5TPR WALLS 2X4 FRAM 2X4 FLATS 2 X I O JOIST 2X6 PLATE ' ° ' ~ : FELT m .; . . a STEM WALL - rooTER .~:. .:I- =III=I ; I~-III. ; :.; ;; ..:. .~,; 1.6X24.'.. REMOVE E)<IST. STUCCO 6 BRICK VENEER. I X 6 SHEATHING AS-BUILT WALL SECTION SCALE: 3/n" = I -0" '~} R>:assEDUGnr 3UP.FAGE MOUNTED DXNPE uGnru2EwwnrFANt HPATER333WTa1E5 Q{ SOJNCE @L Ilovamtr °®J WEATHER PROOF®OUftET "~I olmEroN AA aRarc ~~{ GRWND FAULT M2RRUPf OURET g{ swrmwamer L'IEOIRIOAL5AITRI ® SMOxE DEfFOTCR KI PNCNE --- i tILLTWCAl VARING WALL LEGEND: ® IXIST. 4' CMU WALL 2X4 PT PLATE I OX I/z' J-BOIT Q 6' O.C. CREATE COMINUOU$ TIE FRONA FOOTERTO ROOF. 30 LBS FELT A5 ROD, 6° EMBEDMENT INTO IXIST. SLAB. Q 2' O.C. :-IXIST. COAC.5LA8 i ~ ~(I)dSRODQSO.C.FlLL CELL W13OO0 P51 CONC. ~ 3000 P51 CONC. FOOTING ~ TERMITETREATED SAND Va" PER 12" SLOPE -- FLASH CORNER JOIM BUILT UP ROOF 2X8 tfDGER BOARD FASTEN W/ 318' X 4' LAG BOLT -MATCH IXIST. ALUM DR1P EDGE YO 2X4 FRAMING Q I G" O.C. MATCH IXIST. FASCIA. STAGGER PATTERN : LEDGER HEIGHT: I' ABOVE _ DOOR TO HOUSE VEMED SOFFIT TO MATCH IXLST: 1U528 JOIST HANGER HURRI-BOLT NM b H9 TRUSS STRAP. 50UARE WASHER SJ8' MIN. STUCCO Vz' HURRIBOLT Q 6' O.C. DWBIE TOP PLATE MAX f A$ SHOWN ON PLAN _ Vz" GYP BOARD ~ 5/8° MIN. STUCCO OVER /'AOA/+G LAiAI I ~ ROOF 3O185FELTbMEfALIAiH SECTION AA Vz CDX PLYWOOD SCALE: Wt" = I'-(T Pf 2x4 FRAMING Q I6' O.C. -- - ~ l ~ 42'-G" ~-~ ~ I (2)12' SS ROD EMBEDDED IMO IXIST. FOOTING W! HIGH STRENGTH EPOXY. ION AA 12° X 20° FOOTING W/ 2 A5 ROD, CONTINUOUS. I-------- ~-IA- ---,- I~ I arxtsx - A ' ~ ~ ~ - - 1~ A - - ~ - - ~ NEW 2x4 FRAMING @ 16" O.C. . h ' ° ~ I I II I II anocraAce (2112° /ES ROD EMBEDDED I -.~ REMOVE EXIST. BLOCK WALLS DOOROPEN ~ IMO IXIST. FOOTING W! ._ .~ ~ r ~ GARAGE ~ ~, II - HIGH STRENGTH EPOXY. j r `~",~ I I ~ ~ '~ . / ANCHOR WALL TO IXIST. ~ ' ~ I' i ' I i i ~~ ~ E i W/ EGA NA115 @ IG°O.C. ~ - I I li ' II I -_ ° I I ITT I I - I Vz" HURR1801T @ G O.C. '~ ` ' MAX C A5 $HOWNON PLAN ~; I ~ I I I I I a I ttl FI _~ ~~. - II II ' V I 1 / 1 .T^ ~ I s ~~ I I I 1 I DINING it II I I I i I I _I 1 I I 'iV _l- I ® NtiV FRAMED IXf6T1OR WAILS Wl Vz' PLYWOOD SHEATHING, LATH <S70000. (_ NEW 2X4 fPJ~M®WALi W/ 112 ' GYP tXMRD BO7H SIDC9 O EQLSi. FRAMED WALLTO REMNN ______1 DEMOOaSr.FT:ANffDwaus cn NEW CABINETS f APPLIANCES KRCHEN ~~_......_~......., m ' ~" HURR180LT Q 6' O.C. MAX d A5 SHOWN ON PLAN 2%8 ROOF JOISTS Q I G' O.C. PT SOLE PLATE. Pf 2X4 $1'UDS Vo° R 12" SLOPE Q I G° O.C. AROUND GARAGE. ~ 2X8 SUB FASCIA . ' RE WALLS i FILL IN CLOSET . ~~ , ~ i ~.._ ... .. ... - . ._. W G : '-`~ ... ~ D ROPENIN - I :....... N I BED I Rl'MOVE WAL ~r~r l LIVING CEILING HEIGHT - 9'- I i Vi" ' ^~ FILL IN DOOR ~ -flLL IN OPENINGS ! I CLOSET _ _._. .~ .. _ CLOSET -~ ~ i~ / I . ~ ~:. ~ ~ I IA I ! ~~i N Y / NEW BED 3 BATH/1 I1 All NEW BEDRAOM OUTLETS SHALT I , ' d ~. O BE ON ARC INTERRUPT CIRCUIT 1 NEW WINDOW. HATCH S'-d - p(15T. BATHROOM WINDOW 43'-6 I!4' FLOOR PLAN SCALE y'= I!-0° i i i i j I p [~(~l~Ofll APR 12 2005 DEN CITY OfNCLFAIAYlAEER EPi l~ I I I I BED 2 I I e ~Ilooc ' Dode~xVPS ~ . P 'Pd ~Oa NEW 2x4 FRAMING Qo I G O.C. ' p4~ Aese•' S G~' ~N F,~CO' f ¢c~~13,a FLOOR PLAN ~ SECTION5 ` - REVISIONS 18 FEB OS 5 APR 05 N$ ~ ' `° z _ ~ fJ In ~ ~ n 4 mN l~ (] Q r ~I p N ~ J p v w ~ U ~ z I~u N FF -- p 3 ~ ~ Q p - U N C Q O61GN t DRAFTING fSY: Q a a '" 0.1 !r v W ^ "~ 0 a z ~ G7 W N IYI . p ~ ~ 3 a _ 3 z Y ; 0 0 Q LL ~..:~ _ n. ~ //~ W p m '., _ I t~I ~.. V\Y W (Q a~ ~ a~ ~ c^^~,, W U Z r Q ~umO ~ gn . N ~ w d NV ~ ~ ° ar; 7 m ~ ~ Q ~ 3 "-u~ m 0 \D N `V` a - ~~, ~ ui d 5'OAIE ~' m GMECNED BY: a ~ DRAWN BY: ~ Rand ~ N DATE: ~ n 7;~N . RRgaECT o NUMBER ~ H O O BNEET O o o NUMBER: W ~ . Q. 20F1p °" d'V rc` DOm w~ .~ ~U N nC~ ~.I O SECTION ...5 , , ,TOWNSHIP , . 29 , ,SOUTH, RANGE , , 15 .. EAST, , , , , , PINELLAS . , , , ,COUNTY, FLORIDA BOUNDARY SURVEY BASIS OF BEARINGS IS ASSUMED ~~ m ~.. I\ 3 i~ ,~ 2258 , h ' . ~ • . ; • ~ • 3 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ • ':ONE 'STORY' C:B:S:: w • • • . • .. • ~ RES, #:; 84 0 ~ . ~ • •' P COWYN . IONESPfIOCR EL=",9.31' . GARAGE, F100R Q.~ 7.09', • • , • ~ FND PKdcD .: ' • osr wAU ~ TO P O.L S.ao' ~ t it ` j ~ • LBO 7101 • . • • • • • • _ . ; . s:2o' • for ~' 3ass. P.O.L. r as4' wAU. : • ... . . : wAU N89'58'40"W ~ ` ` ww.' ~ 110.00'1 0.59'S. '~ 0.69'S •• • • i . __,. BLDG ;:: ; . '. 2.00'N: , BLDG.' 2.01'N, A/C • • --Q FCM 5"x5" BENCH MARK r I Buc. coR. CITY OF CLEARWATER B.M. # F-3 ELEV.= 2.71' N.A.V.D. 88 0 ~ N '~ Oi 1 BLOCK 6 ~ ~ ~ ~:^ ~ , 4 CONG ~S ~+~, o.43's ~~ ~ I ~ ~~, ; 17.3' • • ~ N89'59'49"E ~ 110.00'MC; 110'R ~ • 2.2' ' FNO•„X„ • . • • • ; ' : • 85.01'M TO P.O.L • . ,- • •' -- .. • •.. . • ... 25' FND 'X' o' - TIE 9 _ _ `, • • . • . , P.O.L . zs;t . • TILE F . : • • •) ~ ' W .. ~ . STEPS 4.or TIE 9.25 ~ . ,. _ :., ~i ~~ in LEGEND • -POWER POLE - - - - - -OVERHEAD WIRES CONC. • '. 6' •Y~F ~ : I . . . 1.61'S. 1.42'S. •. A/C • •A/C / . : .. a23'S• o.25'S.' \• •.: •• LEGAL DESCRIPTION B N 9/~, ao : . ,~ Q •~; , COV, 4.10' .30' ~ , : ~ . 0:. ~~ 4 88'W ^ ' ~ ~' -~ ' • • . . 4.18' •4.J2' . ~ .a . • o . co STEPS a N . ~ . • ;~. ~ • ~ ~ BRICK asr wAU. • FND "X" • • ` , FTID PK~U } 1269: • • • a21'N • a08'W 110'R •' • • ;'.•• N •• ' • .' • ~ e FNO o'eu NaiF: M . • wAU • . a21's,; ao4'w. . • 1.4rs. F ?~ 17.2' . N ~ I ~~ ~ , 4~ ~ g ' ~ i 1 ~~ ~'''~ 1 ~~ ~ Z 30'R , " --O FlR 5 8" ~ 3181 BLK. COR. LOT 3, BLOCK 6, MANDALAY SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGES 32 THROUGH 35, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINEII.AS COUNTY, FLORIDA. FlRM ZONE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE VE (B.F.E.= 14'), IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FlRM MAP OF PINELLAS COUNTY, COMMUNITY PANEL N0. 12103C-0102-G, MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. PREPARED FOR DAVID ERUCH SURVEYOR'S NOTE THE SITE IS SUBJECT TO THE COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE, WHICH WAS NOT LOCATED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. CERIIFlCATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIff THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN HEREON SUBSTANTIALLY MEEK THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR lANO~ SURVEYING DESCP~IBED 1N Tl1E;STATE OF FLORIDA RULE 61G17, F.A.C. FURTHERMORE, 'THIS CERTIFICATION SHAIL.N~1T Ef('END TO ANY OTHER PERSONS OR PARTIES OTHER THAN THOSE NAMED SNv THIS SURJEY AND SHALL NOT BE VAUO AND BINDING AGNNST THE UNDERSIGNED SURVEYORi WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL ATURE OF TH FLORIDA ~ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 0 A. SHIM II, FLORI REGISTERED LAND S~IRVEYOR No. 2512 OWAYNE A. RUTH, PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER No. 5635 THIS SURVEY IS NOT COMPLETE OR VALID UNLESS ATTACHED TO SURVEYOR'S REPORT. JOB NUMBER: 040111 DATE SURVEYED: 2-19-2004 DRAWING FlLE: 040111,DWG DATE DRAWN: 2-25-2004 LAST REVISION: N/A X REFERENCE: N/A GEORGE A. SHIIIIP II AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS 9901 I1eS07YI BOUL~'V•l1711, SUIT' 1! PAldl AARgOR, FLORIlI~ ,94683 LB 1834 PfION~ (~,~yJ ye4! ar9s F,,1.~ (~,~~J yes-~,~as ~. a REVI510N5 I o ~ I la ' N u N N r _.._.._. ~ lD i I z~ ~ 4 ~ ~ m m i I m N W 1 ~ Q t` i > ~ 0 N i QI ~ a 01 J ~ _ i b : ~ ,~~,i ONE STORYC.B.5. ~1 K 0 1D RES. a04o o) ~ ~ N i l0'NESr RCOREL X9.31' I - ~~'. GAGCE ft00R fl:T ~',' ~.:',.. ~ G Q ~ i tWt~~~ O ~ ~ I r a ~ ~ ~ 1 1 I L _ u <.. , .. i ~ . `: I ~ ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._. _. _. _. .., ,, N Q C lEGA1: ~'.;: I LOT 3. BLOCK 6 MANDALAY ~ ~ 3a R 061GN 4 DP.APfING BY: SUBDINSION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT I THEREOF A5 RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I 14, PAGES 32 THROUGH 35, OF THE rn FUBUC RECORC5 OF PINElIAS (z COUNTY, FLORIDA W~ H '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w x ~ a ~' yl e w ~ Q y Q 3 FLORIDA STRUCTURAL LOAD LIMITATIONS (FBC-2001 Sect 1606.1.7) FLOOR LIVELOAD:~ 40 PSF 80 PSF CORRIDORS 30 PSF SLEEPING ROOMS ROOF LIVE LOAD: ROOF SNOW LOAD: 20 PSF NOT APPLICABLE WBVD LOAD: I. BASIC WIND SPEED = 130 MPH (3 SEC. GUST) 2. BUILDING CATEGORY = B (ASCE 7-96)WIIJD A'~ORTANCEFACTORIw= 1 3,WB4DEXPOSURECATEGORY C 4. ENCLOSURE CLASSD'[CATION: ENCLOSED INTERNALPRESSURECOEPFICBiNT= +/. 0,18 5. COMPONENT @ CLADDRJG ROOF: (IOSF) Fm R00F ANGLE= IO T030 DEGREES H = O TO 30 FEET Proof = ZONE l = 21.7 -33.8 ZONE2= 21.7 -71.3 ZON'E3= 21.7 •71.7 OVERHANGZONE2= fi8.8 OVERHANG ZONE 7 = -I 15.7 WALL:(WINDOWBeD00RS)(IOSF) ' Pwell = ZONE4= 36.9 -00.0 ZONES= 36.9 -09.4 THIS BUB.DBPG [SNOT DESIGNED FOR PLACEMENT ON TE1E UPPER HALF OF A FIB,L OR ESCARPMENT EXCEEDMG IS FEET INHEIGHT. SEISMIC LOAD: NOT APPLICABLE SOII. BEARING PRESSURE: 2,000 PSF CODES 2001 Florida Building Code 2001 Florida Building Cade- Mechanical 2001 Florida Building Code- Plumbing 2001 Florida Building Code- Fuel Gas 20~ Florida Fire Preventmn Code 2003 NFPA 1 •UnHorm Fire Cade 2003 NFPA 101 Life Safety Cotle 2002 NEC -National Electric Code (NFPA 70) Construction: Type VI -unprotected Occupancy: R3ResideMial OcapaM Load: 1 person per 200 SF CONCRETE NOTES: ENCLOSED STRUCTURE NOTES: A PLYWOOD PANEL AS PER SECTION 1606.1.4 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE MUST BE MADE FOR EACH NEW WINDOW AND STORED ON SITE. THE PLYWOOD PANEL SHALL CANFORM TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM REOUIREMEMS: MINIMUM THICKNESS: 7/16° MAXIMUM SPAN: 8' PANELS SHALL BE PRECUT TO COVER THE GUSED OPENINGS WTH ATTACNMEM HARDWARE PROVIDED AND MARKED W/ DESIGNATION FOR EACH WINDOW 2 I/2" A 6 WOOD SCREW5 WRH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF I6". WHERE SCREWS ARE ATTACHED TO N1A50NRY OR MASONRY! STUCCO, THEY SHAlI BE ATTACHED USING VIBRATION-RE55TAN1' ANCHORS HAVING A MINIMUM WITHDRAWAL CAPACITY OF 490 LB. DOORS MUST BE BOUALLY PROTECTED UNLESS ENGINEERED FOR WIND LOADS, INCLUDING FRENCH DOORS. FLOOR SLAB OF PLAM MIX CONCRETE 3000 P.5.1. 4° THICK Wfftt FIBER MESH REINFORCEMEM OR 6X6 10110 GAUGE REINFORCING MAT. OVER TERMITE TREATED 501E WITH 6 MIL POLYETNYIENE VAPOR BARRIER OVER COMPACTED CLEAN FILL CONCRETE SPECS: SLAG 3000 P.5.1. IN 28 DAYS FOOTINGS• 3000 P.5.1. IN 28 DAYS --7 I II t f + ,I ~ - MAY ~ ~ ~ ,, i 2005 ..~ ' i I,~ , PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITv OF CLEARW c .~... ~~.-._._______- AT~R "~---._1 SQUARE FOOTA~ES: EXPANDED DECKS: 261 S0. Ff. EXIST. DECKS: 593 S0. FT. TOTAL DECKS: 854 S0. FT. p ~C~C~Od~ MAY 18 2009 INDEX °B' °~' SHEET SUBJECT I GOVER SHEET, SITE PIAN 2 FRONT PORCfi RENOVATION 3 BACK PORCH RENOVATION COVER SHEET ~ ~ ~ Q LI. Q a N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ m ~ a+ a ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ N ` Z ~ ~ Q m m O um 3" ~0 '~= m .~ ~ ~ lD Wa - ~~ ar; o w ~47wKr 0 N ~ .. Z 3~u~iud o t~. . o.. N = ~'O. N, ' I+0` : * ' . :. .. .,: LLl '. '. ~ A5 ~ iD BY: W ~ BY: a a '° Ranc Q 1p -Gn 9MAgN T rL ~ t: S~NSD --Ooo;~ c I WNWO~ _~;oa~~€ r>,m6~N I. I :/+" PER 12° SLOPE ~ REVISIONS HU - Li COIIPUNG, 2X4 Pf PLATE ~ FLASH CORNERJOIM BUILT UP _ NM d SQUARE WASHER 109( 4~z" J-BOLT Qa ~6' O.C. 2X8 LEDGER BOARD I B FEB OS FASTEN W/ 3/8° X 4` LAG BOLT MATCH EXIST. ALUM DRl P EDGE 5 APR O5 NEW 3000 F51 CONC. CREATE CONTINUOUS TIE - 'TO 2X4 FRAMING Q 16" O.C. MATCH IXST. FASCIA. REMOVE IXISTING ROOF MATERIAL, FROM FOOTERTO ROOF. _ ' REPLACE AM' ROTTED I X6 SHEATHING. yqW CUT 24° OPENING IN ~ STAGGER PATTERN ; LEDGER HEIGHT: 1' ABOVE U N LAY NEW 30 LE5 FELT 6 SHINGLES. EXIST. SLAB. N 30 LB5 FELT DOOR TO HOUSE VENTED SOFFIT TO MATCH EXIST. C9 •• U t4 nURRi-BOLT NUT d ~ m ~ LU528 JOIST HANGER Z J 'D Q € - k5 ROD, 6° EMBEDMENT INTO NURRI-BOLT NUT d H9 TRll55 STRAP. ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ N SQUARE WASHER o v IXIST. SLAB. Q 2' O.C. 5/8"MIN. STUCCO SWARE WASHER ~ N H9 TRUSS STRAP. CONNECT EXIST. ROOF 0 DOUBLE TOP PLATE Vz" HURRIBOLT ~ 6 O.C. ~ Q t` MAX d AS SHOWN ON PLAN ~ ~ RAFTERS TO NEW ExTERIOR FRAMED WALL = ~ - - ~ ~ '" ~ ~.. _., (f ~ IXIST. COfaC.5LA0 ~i a N ~ i-Eli-=,11_- } :I'-='I._. r NEW AU1M. DRIP EDGE $ : " I =~... ' ' !--- I I-_I ~ Vz GYP BOARD 5/8' MIN. STUCCO OVER J ~ U .~,_._I =-~I ~~i"-'i. (I)N5ROD,'QEO.C.RLI ,I - i REPLACE AM' m ~ --! I I' .-- '- -)' --~ ~'.~~~ '' I :- CONC. 30LB5 FELT d METAL LATH ~ w ROTTED SU&FASCIA ~ ~ . ;._.;, __~ I ,__ ; ._ ,, _ ~ I_ CELL Wl3ooo P51 GARAGE WALL ~ ROOF c~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N -i' I -- ' ==' ' _ ~" cox PmvooD o _ REPLACE ALUM. VEMED SOFFlT d FASCIA ~, -::i I . - ,. _l I ~ ~ ~= ~ ~ :f: l _I ~ 3000 PSI CONC. FOOTING . ~ Q _ ~~ I ~ --I • .. .I"i I ~ 1= I . ~ SECTION AA ~ o ~ REPLACE VEM FF ~ LI~L:-1:-%. ~'~.~:• •:`II-'.'.~~-'a SCALE: '-0+"=1'-0' W 3 ED ED 50 fT ANO N ~ / . i.-- ,.. ., ' ~._. I-' I PT 2x4 FRAMING Q H 6' O.C. Q ANY ROTTED FURRING ~ - = TERMITE TREATED SAND ~_ ~ ~ ~ t` u - _~~I~i~'-1I --~. V - U ~' HURRIBOLT @ 6' 0.0 a -- ~'-- -' -` ~ 42-G' ~. ~/ N Q C MAX E AS SHOWN ON FLAN ~ - ~ ~ 1 I m 518° MIN. STUCCO OVER (2) COMINUOUy fly ROD ~ ~ DaIGx i DRAPNNG Dr: I ~'~ I (2)12' AS ROD EMBEDDED 30LB5 FELT d METAL IAfN W(3 4h"CLEARANCE FROM Vz' HURRIBOIT (q~ 6' O.C. ' S1DE5 AND BOTTOM IMO IXIST. FOOTING W1 MAY 8 A5 SHOWN ON FLAN ~ ~~ EXIST. 2X4 FRAMING HIGH STRENGTH EPOXY. - a txz" CDX PLYWOOD ~ ' 12" X 20' FOOTING W/ 2 PT SOLE PLATE. Pf 2X4 SNDS ~ 2X8 ROOZJ519AT~g I G' O.C. W I IXIST. IX65HEATHING GARAGE FOOTING SECTION AA asRQD,coMlN000S. ~ IG°O.C.AROUNDGARAGE. 2X8 SUB FASCIA ~l a 2x4 FRAMING @ 16° 0.0 SCALE: B/+" = I'-0" ~ ~ F e EXIyT. PIASTER WAILS ~ t A ~ ~ M ---------1-- ---,- iC d ~ HURRI-BOLT COUPLING, _ - .7 NUTdSQUARE WASHER ~ ___ _yrxrsN___- ~ vFi ~ `~ EXIST. 2x4 FIATS II _ ~ t~ A NEW 2x4 FRAMING Q 16" O.C. _~ ~ ~' Z NEW 2x4 Pf PLATE I - ~ ' I -„ x+ m A .r'i. 30 LB5 FELT \~ ~ " - ~ ~" ~~ ° . W C HURRI-BOLT EPOxY SND EMBEDDED 6" ~ 12' aZ M ~ , ~ ~ _ '~ AvroGnxAee '~ (2) 5 ROD E BEDDED REMOVE IXIST. BLOCK WA1L5 DOOROPCN ~ Q INTO CONC. W! HIGH STRENGTH EPOXY. m IMO IXIST. FOOTING W/ ;f. f ' i i ~ ~ 2X8 OMRIGGERS IXIST. 2 X I O FLOOR J015T (ORUSE HURRI-80LT WEDGE ANCHOR) _ ~ HIGH STRENGTHEPOXY. f ~ ~ ,` i i -~ GARAGE ¢ i i' Q 16 O.C. ~-~~ - r I' IXIST. 2 X 6 PLATE . ~. ~ ~. ~ .,'~ ..(i : i ~ --------'" .. ,I .ANCHOR WALL TO EXIST. ~ ' ~ : ' IXIST. FELT ~? 5~:~ STEM WALLS REPAIR: CHIP OUT AM' CRACKED CONCRETE. - ' ' i. ~. I ~ I W1 d,Gd NAILS ~ I G' O.C. ~ ~ I i' ? ':.x' CHEMICALLY TREAT RUSTED REBAR TO REDUCE fUfURE ii Y i '~ ~ ~ ~~ I __ ' o .: `~a ~~ _ RUSTING, PAINTREBARWITHARUSTOLIUMTYFEPALM, -'"" \~ iii , ,... , _ IXIST. STEM WAIL .; I =_ THEN PATCH CONCRETE U51NG A CONC. ADI1E$IVE. f ---- ---- IXIST. FOOTER "~ •, =III=I _ - ., ° _ -III=I IXIST. CONC. DECK - I I 4 l.6....i l3 _...., ° L EN ,. .. ~ I ~ I=I ~~ I =III: i I _ m ~ `°~ REM ALLS I,G x 24. < .; I i °°1'^ NEW CABINETS °r III=III ;..'.....,.. III ~ I Y a~ o _.. =III=I ... ~. -.:.I=~ .-. :... .. .. .. I _.-. t .- _, ._ -. ®®~ dAPFLIANCES i i FILL INC , i .~ _ 0 ~ ~ -III=ILL=III=III=III_III- ~ ~,, LQSET I - ,-,p txZ° HURRIBOLT Q 6' O.C. N DOOR OPENING - i L . ~ . MAX 6 AS SHOWN ON PLAN '~,. m _ - .. ~ I ~.. `. a 0 V c ~ r I. KfTCNEN a BED I i N fif ~ >' I r ~ ~ N 0 fn i e _ p ~ m ~ , ', cLOSEr ~ ~ ~~ I.~ OIYI I~ C1 W ,~ Tr, ~._......_.....-. in °- '~ REMOVB wAU ~ O ~ .. ~ I ---- APR 12 2009 ~ ~t i DBVEIOweEN: SERVICES DEPT ^--.~...~,,,-,-,-~` i Gtr OF CIEAAYNTFfl ~~- 1,./ ELECTRICAL LEGEND ~~ I ~ II t PLASTER wgLtS REMOVE EXIST. STUCCp S X BRICK VENEER. 2 4 FRAM I X 6 SHEATHING ' 2X4PIATE 2x IoJOlsr 2X6 PLATE ~ ~° m' , FELT : ~ '.x''. STEM WALL - - - FoQTER - -:1=III=III= ;.. ` III=~ =III=1:' ~ ., III=III ,..; I=III a ":, -1 I 1=III-III ~ .:::,,.:; :.I I=III: L6X24 ', III ;':, ,>:,II=11 =III=III=III= AS-BUILT WALL SECTION SCALE: B/+" = I'-0° ~- asass~ucnr SURFACE Md1NRD PIXNRE ' nJ~,_ ' . UGRNy O~IPllST PANt '.. ~/ NPATFR135'MTO~.S a DOONCE ~.{ IIW OURPf "gl wfATNER PROOffD ounrl "®1 amETOxAnaRaR ' p'~ GROUND fAUIT INIERRUGI OURET g~ sx+TauowntT ~ ntaww svnrcn. ® sMOUOerecrDR a PtIQNE -- . eleerwcuvnwNG I ~ II II '; DINING i i LNING I I " ~ Z W ~ CEIUN6 HEIGHT _ I i J ~ ' I I I~ ~ I I I °, . Flu IN oooR N Z ~ ` Q m O Q QI C1! W ~ ~ > W _ ~ U ~ WVW - i 1 ~ FIU IN OPENINGS ! ~ ~ ~ U N ,g ~ M ~ > (~ ~ I I N f ® I _ ___ __ _____ __ ~' ~ w C ~ Q ' ~ v ~ fn W I~ cQ ZV T/J O I CLOSET _ _._,_ Q~ 3N N i I J lD'7 Z i I 1 - I ( '• I ~ V NEW ~ BED 2 I q a I 1 1 . - - f . I ALL NEW BEDROOM OUTLETS SHALL ~ ~ O - . .r.-..~- ~.: ~ _ ~' BE ON ARC INTETtRllPf CIRCUIT I - ~ w ~ ~ WALL LEGEND: I I F -- -~- ® IX15T. 4'CMU WALL ~- ___ ~___ - _ _ ____ c¢ _ - ~ La^ c~ i P SCP1E: A51 NPNPRwuorxrepoRwaLS w•7 sf- ~ PLYNOOD SHEATHING, LATH <STUCW. - ~ NEW 2x4 FRAMED WALLWI l2 ~~ NEW WINDOW. MATCH EXIST. BATHROOM WINDOW 5'-0" ~ 43'-G I (4" odm ~a E ~~ °d 10~cC`Pp `oaoN ~ NEW 2x4 FRAMING Qo 16" O.C. - r"' p4 G Pr"~ C;~ ,o1c ~' cNEGNEO Br. Q ~ DR N 8Y virDOARDBOrnslDS ~ _ e~ ~ , 3,AS i : AW Rand .LC1 D IXIST. FRAMED WALL TO RF3-RAIN Dt /I OATS', fl ~ ______, DFMOIXIST.FRAM~wAll5 FLOOR-PLAN T '~o . PRO ... JED NVMBER: Q.uj c - SCALE x+'= I'-0' FL00 P IONS R LAN ~ SECT ' BEET ~o ao - , NUMBER: wN .~ • 2aF;oa ~tV ~~ ` ~m Ws EAST. BEDROOM IXIST. BEDROOM ' - IXIST. LIVING p e GARAGE I Ik' ' 4° CONC. 51A8 p . pe ' ,- ~ 4 CONC. SLAB , IXIST. CONC. PORCH TO REMAIN , i m ------------------~• , i -------------"- ^ p ' p e p ' THICKEN 51AB AT CORNERS FOR ~-- ------'-------------------°'---------'- ' 8X8X 16 CMU W/ (I) d5 ROD IN FlUED ~ ----_--_ - _-------------------'-°--'--' \ 14' X 20' FOOTING W/ (3) k5 P05T ANCHOR BOLTS (SEE DETAIL) CELLS AS INDICATED. TOP COURSE CONTINLIOU5 ROD. DOWEL INTO SHALL BE FILLED K.O. BLOCK. -"--° ----' "-- EXIST. FOOTING W/ 6"MIN. 12° TNICK TOOTING UNDER EMBEDMENT. NEW STEPS. DOWEL INTO EXIST. FOOTING W/ 12° AS Roo a r o.c. FOUNDATION PLAN SCALP: V<' = I'A" 3 TREAG$ ~ ~~ "a~ vm '-I 117 57AIR DETAIL SCALE: Vx" = I'-0" 4KG PQSr y- 5" 3 COURSES OF 51MP. ABU46 P05T BASE 8X8X I6 CMU 4' CONC. SLAB. .. ~ _ _ ~ Y _ !l ~' t.. ~~= .:I: I , CLEAN, COMPACTED, TERMITE ' EXIST. CONC SLAB a ~ I I-- :~ .; I ~ :__. TREATED FILL. -1 I - ~,!~ (I)aISRODINCORNERBLOCKS ~ ~~ ~ -'I i!. - _ AND PS INDICATED ON ~ i.-- ~ __!I a : ~. FOUNDATION PLAN. I_.i I-- ._-I 1 ~ 1- ill. -III--I; 12° A5 ROD WJ 6' EMBEDMENT (3) N5 CONTINUOUS RDD W/ INTO EXIST. SLAB I'mo' 25° MIN. OVERLAP. MAINTAIN MIN. 3° CLEARANCE FROM BOttOM a EDGE Of FOOTING. FOOTING SECTION 4 V2" MAY. SPACING NO GAP IN GUARD RAILSHALL ALLOW a a'srmeRe ro P0.35 rnROUCa+. 4X6 BEAM W/ ILE4 C FRONT PORCH PLAN GUARDRAIL DETAIL ~ A DIflNISH~WlNHARDE-T~MJ FRONT ELEVATION NEW CONC. CURVED STEPS N N U546 FACE MOUNT (ANGER PROVIDE 2X TATTER IN WALL. 423 CUPS ONE ON BACK OF EACH 2X8 4X6 BEAM WI (2) $IMP. tE4 OR EQUAL. REVISIONS N 0 N z~ m 4 Tq N ~J n ~ Q M ~~ w ~ N J o C W ZQQZ Cdl N PC FQ p 3 ~ N laaD _ ~ 7 N Q C DESIGN a DRAFTING fH: r~ a a I.a ~ w e Pa W e~ y w ~ a z~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ y z 3 a 3 w z c~ ~F "0 .` ~ ~ o o > u. ~ 0 G a° o s ~ V , ~ ~ N L ~ ~ m L ~ ~ U ~ _ _ ~ W +~ -- o ~ ~.~ r ~ ~ -- r _ ~ ~, ~P/ ~ ~ ~ L L lJ T ' ~-._.__.... U -~ i MAY " 12005 {~. N zi0 N PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT z+3 '' mg SERVICES v Q "', ~, IXIST. ROOF ~CI'V OF CLEARWATER ~ 0 3'" ~, II p `NEW DECORATIVE LI COLUMNS AR(H1ND 4X6 POST 'NEW CONC. DECK (~ (~ M I] L~ l% ~ ~ U ~ II^~ IIn ~I I Mar ~ a ~~ U DEVL'10PMENT&ERNP~SDEF? CITYDFCIfAiDYAT81 FRONT PORCH DESIGN ORIGINAL r ~ tD - wv - ~~ il: o Q U' W 3 N K 0 ~' ~ z J 7 ~ L m -NUa. p N - ~, ~. ~ 10 () ' _ ~ °~ w d J SCALE: P$ NOTED CHECKED SY: 9 MAY 05 PROTECT NvLt3ER: 5246 SHEET NIRABER ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE: Vi = I'-0' COLUMN DETAIL SCALE: Vz" = 1'-1Y' n .~ ORIGINAL 4X6 BEAN LCf 4x6 P05T 9" 5" 51MP. ABU46 P05T BASE REBUILD BLOCK • WALL ATCOWMNS IXIST.4"CONC. SLAB. AND POURSOUD NEW 5' LANDING `D l N ~._:~~ _ N --~i~- I2"LONG #S ROD W/6° n '.=:1 ~ I ~ EMBEDMENT INTO IXIST. 5U18 a -1 __ { __ f EPOXY _ . i ~ ~ ~ : ~~ ,.) . ',." b EXIST. CONC STAB l - I I ' `~ ~ ~ '- - - ' ~._I I~ _~ I ,~. ADD 3'X 3'PAD _ ~. I I I_ . ~ ~ ®COWMNS I~"& FOOTING SECTION SCALE: Uz" = I'-0" I'-0° g _: N -.~-_ l N 9~ a Y N 4 t2". MAX. SPACING CE MOUM 'ROVIDE 2X WAIL, 5 ON BACK OF BON EACH BEAM CUT BACK IXISTING BTE~ TO THIS LINE. .M W1 (2) 51MP. :EQUAL. NO GAP IN GUARD RNL SHALLAIIOW A 4' SPHERE TO PA55 THROUGH, 50~ FR DR Faae FR DR 1 '~"HIGH RAILING / `, ` 12" #5 ROD EMBEDDED 6' IMO •~ 12" #5 ROD EMBEDDED 6" ~~ INTO IXIST. STEP W/HIGH EXIST. CONC. SLAB W! HIGH `' \ \ ~ STRENGTH IXPOxY p 2' O.C. STRENGTH IXPOXY @ 2' O.C. CUi IXIST. SLAB TO ~ \ \ ' "~\ ALLOW FOR NEW FOOTER \ ~ .. \ REMOVE IXIST. FORM R SQUARE OfF '•,~ COWMN d WAIL CORNEROF PORCH ~, ~, i ` ~- ., ^® ~ \ •.\ ~\ ^Q i ^® _L.....__............_ ...__..... ~-.I' ® ~ 12' X 3' X 3' PAD __~ ~ _ 1 _r''_J~ .-_ ~` i J O N ~. ,. ........ .............~_... .~ -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CONC. SLAB W/ 7.5° R1SER 41'-3" CUt BACK IXISTING 5TEP5 TO THIS LINE. BACK PORCH PLAN r._ _ ...__.__... ____.._-_.._ ,_.,~_.. ..~ SCALE: Vi' = I'-0" 2 TREADS I 1"=I'-10" ~ 1 ! I I I° "~ ~: ~~ !; ~_ Ul 6 ~. ~ ~ MAY 3 tl 2005 a r, `" n STAIR DETAIL I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER EXIS1. ROOF NEW 2X8 OPEN RAFTERS Q 16" O.C. NEW 4X8 BEAM ,. a ~ -~ :._ -- ,. ::. „t : ,._- :vz: ~ -."+m- ~ , NEW2X80PEN rs° ~* RAFTERS ..~ ..:. .. .. - p C~6[~pdC~ N %i' ti I P^'r' MAY ~ B ZOO ~~ ~ ~~~~'. ~VEIAPMBlTSFfMC~OFAf ~ OFCtfAHWATER GUARDRAI L DETAI L 2X FRAMING AROUND 4X6 R~St J_ _ _ 1 ~ _ _ J AND FlNISH W/ HARDIE-TRIM NEW CONC. STEFB W/ 5' LANDING SCALE: Uz" = I'dP REAR ELEVATION SCALE::/~' = I'A" ---J -- N N NEW 3' X 3' X 12° CONC. FOOTER W/ (4) #5 RODS BOTH WAYS. BACK PORCH DESIGN RtV1510N5 O N z~ N R J n N 4 OT N l~ Q Q (~ ~ ~ N Ir ~ O W Z y~~ N O G W ~ °~~ ~ a _ U ~ `~ u ~ r ~ Q DE51GN C DRAFTING BY: a w A a F '0 0.1 w "' ~ oe ~ ~ ~ Z xi (` d ,~• Q o W C N i 3 0 ~L i ; 0 O Q V. C) _ ~- ~ U ~ N ~ f0 ~ m U ~ `N ~ UJ ,,., ~ ~ f~ a~ ~ N U N Z ~ m Qm mo um 3N ~0 ~= m ~ ~ W a ~-~yy ~ ~ ¢ F O Q ~ ~ ~ C ~ N _ 3v_N~d m `~ N N \ N ui d J scALE: AS NOTED CHECI(EDBY: WJM DMWN BY: Rancy Young DATE 9 MAY 05 FRNECT M>n~R seas SHEET NUMBER 30F3 i COLUMN DETAIL SCALE: H4" = r-a 0 .N ~a i~ Oo Oo ~ 0 ~ z ~' o r 5 ~, ~; ~,~ Z ~ ~- a I I' BLOCK 6 ~ ~ ~ l _ ?.... 4 ---,_ -__~_____ ~ 1 conc. I conc. ~ CONC. 17.3' 0.43'& 0.37'N. ~ ~ 0.28'N, ; ,' ~ / N89'S9'49"E ~ 110.00'MC; 110'R ~ • 2.2' , ~~ ~.' . • : ' :' 85.01'M TO P.O.L. ~ ' ~ • - TlE s,25' •FND "X" r FPS • TILE `4.02' TlE 9.25' ' ~ •, ,, ~. ,~„~ epic ~ '' '~ (CONCRETE) ONE STORY C.B,S. 4.~'w' . ~ ~ . ' • ~ ~ RES. # .840 , cov. ~ 8 •~ ' Rw ~ ~ ~ . ~ '' • ' IONEST FLOOR Q.- 9.31 .. '. ;•~ ' ~ ' ~ " ' COWNN GNUOE FLOOR a.- z0e' 4.88'W. . • _ Q 4.16' •4.32' . ~ . Q , ~ co .,~ . .. ', STEPS °o : 1 . .. •, . ~,---,, 94,51'M ~ BRICK N ~ ~ 1. . ' •osr wAU ~' s:oo~ ~\TO P,O.L, ~ osr ,•I.. • , . • • • • . 1,12' ~ wALL , :, • s:2d t.or 33.55' . .. ....• - 0.84' WNl. FND ~X" 1+ .. .. , ... :.. „ : ,.:. ..: ~ fND PKdrO / 1169: ,;.: 39'58'40"W ~ ~ w~u' •• 110.00'MC; 110'R ~' ~' ,N ~• ~ • ` ~'~ ~' Nay. , os9's. •.. ~ ~ . • ~• ~ . ~ ~ wul ', aa1's.; o.a4'w. ~~ ----~~.. • 1.4rs. F ~ 17.2' • n, w n ~ rri _ f ~ I .. __ ~_ ---_ __ 5 29 15 ' PINELLAS .. __: -•-____. _.__ __.. SECTION ... , . , ,TOWNSHIP ......SOUTH, RANGE , .....EAST, , , ,,, , , , , ,,, , , , ,E~ COUNTY, FLORIDA BOUNDARY SURVEY J ~ ~~ BASIS OF BEARINGS IS ASSUMED '~C ~`~""~-- z ~, w . ~ ~ ~' =~ ~ I ~ ~ H BENCH MARK eix. coR~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ o -- ~ w ¢ CITY OF CLEARWATER B.M. # F-3 ~-; o > J ELEV.= 2.Z1' N.A.V,D. 88 .~ ~ ~ >.. °~ w ~' g m LEGEND • -POWER POLE - - - - - -OVERHEAD WIRES LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 3, BLOCK 6, MANDALAY SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGES 32 THROUGH 35, OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. FlRM ZONE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE VE (B.F.E.= 14'), IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRM MAP OF PINELLAS COUNTY, COMMUNITY PANEL N0. 12103C-0102-G, MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. PREPARED FOR DAVID ERUCH SURVEYOR'S NOTE THE SITE IS .SUBJECT TO THE COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL UNE, WHICH WAS NOT LOCATED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. CERTIFlCATION; I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE-BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEIIEF THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN HEREON SUBSTANTIALLY~,MET:TS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR LAND SURVEYING DESCRIBED-IN~TiiEY`STA'tE. OF FLORIDA RULE 61G17, F.A.C. FURTHERMORE, THIS CERTIFICATIAN ~IPaLi NOT'EkiEND TO ANY OTHER PERSONS OR PARTIES OTHER THAN THOSE NAw4kG ON THIS SJRVEY AND.. SHALL NOT BE VALID AND BINDING AGAINST THE~UNDERSIGNED.SUR1~t=YOR WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL RNSED SEAL At , ATURE;OF TNT F1,ORIDA,LIQ SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. GEORGCA. SHIMP II, FLORIUK REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR No. 2512 DWAYNE A. RUTH, PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER No. 5635 THIS SURVEY IS NOT COMPLETE OR VALID UNLESS ATTACHED TO SURVEYOR'S REPORT. JOB NUMBER: 040111 DATE SURVEYED: 2-19-2004 DRAWING FILE: 040111:DWG DATE DRAWN: 2-25-2004 LAST REVISION: N A X REFERENCE: N A GEORGE A. SHIMP' II AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS 990! IJeSOTD gOUld'V.1RIJ, SlllTd' 1! PA~I fLlRDOR, FLORIIrG! 84688 LB 1834 PIIONd' ~787~ 7'84-3496 IArt' ~787~ 7'86-1856