Loading...
FLS2005-10082FLS2005-10082 440 EAST SHORE DR EAIST SHORE LAND DEVELOPMEINT PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS ATLAS # 267A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 10/27/2005 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS STAFF REPORT: DRC CDB: CLWCoverSheet a 1 Planning Department C~earwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue ' Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 ~~ ~~ Fax: 727-562-4865 ~~~ BMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE ~ CASE #: fL5 ~~~~~ - ~ ~ D ~r DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED 8Y (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: ~ NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD APPLICATION b a n (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PR1NT~ ~;. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: ~A/t*~tr M~113L~ i>~~ flG1Ae3~~.+~~n- Lam„ MAILING ADDRESS: 4 ~ ~ Z. Ft..O{2.~ qyc -r,~.,,,,~n,g. ~~ 3 3 X04 PHONE NUMBER: ZL'I "'S'35~~ ZODA` FAX NUMBER: 7 L7 ~ S3(i-~7LlS PROPERTY OWNER(S): ~Ss-rJ ~t~~yp ~U~, ~+.t.1 ~.yp~ ~ T/r,JS~aS ~~ ~.~ K~ t~AM~~ (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -provide original signature(s) on age 6 ~ t' ~ ) kNn IE~4sr.~ortE Lw~ntD Day~~e~wl- I..t..L ~z~3'1 :AGENT NAME: ~T~.IICZJ Qpgatr 't3a~~FFiar~.>D MAILING ADDRESS: ~53~ ~{It+tie~y D~ c~~•r- ~, ____~~r~r~, 3~R'f~4 PHONE NUMBER: 'Z Z~" S3~'- ZOO4 FAX NUMBER: '~ 2'I - ~SrO • t~7 ZR CELL NUMBER: '~ Z"t ~ ~Z ~ \ \ Z~' E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: ~~'D ~kST Srt©~ '~ 2~rc LEGAL DESCRIPTION: G~~ 8~'1ArW A IST/t'~L~trtt~l R~`~„r ~~~ Q j~ ~ ~, (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) -T PARCEL NUMBER: - ~ - 34 - o PARCEL SIZE: SM' i ArG ~~(~ 3a ~~ (acres, square feet) ~- PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): _ Ip VNt~-r- _pN~~~~ ~' j=~ L ~\1 ,i'~if~ (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) ~]~[~~t, i=~ ~ ~lU,!,-.-' DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): _ $~E' A~'f`i'"I4C~li~ Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include alt requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of pa~irig~s""paces specific t~3j` `~ ~ -~~ iut~~..r_.~~f',~~/,c~n CITY OF C1F~= F'~ -~A = Q Page 1 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater ~~ t// ~~°v I T ~ ~ Section B Description of Request The proposed development seeks to redevelop the existing 1950's era 10 unit Koli-Bree Motel Apartments into a 10-unit Condotel. The redevelopment plans provide for a complete updating of the interior finishes and fixtures, repair and replacement of the severely deteriorated structural steel support columns, balcony railings and stairs, the replacement of inefficient windows and air conditioning systems and substantially enhancing the exterior~appearance of the property with architectural improvements to the building facade and landscaping. A cost breakdown is attached to this submittal as is a copy of the appraisers report. The cost of all improvements and repairs combined aze within FEMA guidelines for this property and the cost of repairs and maintenance alone represent approximately eighty-five percent of the total cost. The property owners request a change of use from the current motel apartments and request the new use be permitted with the setbacks that aze currently existing on the property. Due to the extremely narrow size of the property it would be impossible under current setback requirements to design a comparable replacement development that could provide an equal number of rental units to house visitors to the azea and support the local tourist industry. Allowing this change of use request would also increase the number of housing units available for sale to the residential market without adversely impacting the neighborhood. The neighborhood consists of other compazably sized rental and residential units undergoing similaz renovations and improvements. The redevelopment plans for the Cool Breeze help to maintain the chazacter of this neighborhood and preserve its cultural appeal. OCT 1 '7 2005 PLANNING DE~ARTME~lT CITY OF CLE~RiNr'~TER DOESrTHIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREV SLY APPROVED- PLANNED-UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) $ ~6 G Nr~.. W A•/~~+-Ry.-T'~/ ~ ~:'~ /4TTi'1'G~I~'D D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) f~ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. S ~' A+~T~c~I R~~Si~N~L°~ 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. OCT 17 2005 PLAi~Ni~'G DEP,~~Ti~tl~NT CITY OF ~~~~'',~"~~,"T~~? Page 2 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater Section D General Applicability Criteria 1.The proposed development of the land wilt be in harmony with the scale, bulk coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. By limiting the scope of proposed development to repair,replacement, maintenance and exterior renovation of the existing motel structure, the scale, bulk, density and character of the neighborhood will be unchanged save for a much more attractive and better maintained appearance of the property. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The project as designed encourages continued development of the marina district as residential as a significant investment is being made in the renovation and rehabilitation of the existing property which will encourage additional investment in the area. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed use is nearly identical to the prior use of the property that no adverse effects to health or safety should arise. The fact that units will be available for purchase will only enhance the safety of the neighborhood asresident/owners will be occupying the property. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The existing density of the project is unchanged from its prior use and no additional vehicular traffic should occur. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The neighborhood is a mix of comparable rental and residential properties and allowing a change of use that incorporates the existing structure is the best plan for maintaining the character of the community. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The project design is a updated variation of the current design configuration and as such will have no adverse affects or changes in hours of operation. ~~~~~~ V~:~~~ OCT 17 2005 PLANiVlr~'~ i~FFA~2T111IF(~T CITY OF Cl~~:~3~,~rTF~R ~ Provide complete responses to the seven (7~SIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Expla~w each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. $F~~ /~'1'1'14C.r1~'D 12~'9~onJ5s~, 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ~'" ' ~1 ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ i 1 r LUlt~ Cl1T i.JF~,?~~~~,~a~~r'~ Page 3 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater Section D Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Due to the narrow lot configuration, current standards would allow a maximum of three living units where 10 units had previously been sited. In addition, a new, taller structure would alter the existing character of the neighborhood. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The proposed redevelopment of the site in conjunction with the price paid for the land and structure aze substantially higher in value than the current tax assessment reflects. The completed development will enhance the value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Comparable redevelopments are presently underway in the vicinity as referenced in the attached appraisal report. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Adjacent land uses include gift shops, restaurants and other comparable motel apartments and residential units. The proposed use of this property is compatible. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. With the investment in a refreshed exterior appeazance and updated interior finishes, the developments value will be greatly enhanced. The anticipated for sale market value of the individual units is well above the current tax valuation of the existing property and will help to increase the fair mazket value of abutting properties 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed conversion from an outdated and inadequately maintained 1950's era motel into a clean and modem residential style development will ensure a continuation of available and affordable rental housing opportunities for visitors to the azea and continued support of the local business engaged in the tourist trade. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Allowing a change of use is really an extension of the prior use of this property since 1950 and maintains the character of the area. Adherence to current requirements would alter this character. ~~. ~~~~ ~~- OCT 17 2005 PLANN!{~C ~F~A~RiM~NT CIlY OF C~F~,R1r'V;TFR E. S•TORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQU-IREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem~ to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall- provide an explanation as-to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum,'the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; _ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall e provided. 5 j~~ /4~,H ~ fJ ~~-k A ~/E CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ~ ~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, Including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - p/ease design around the existing trees; t~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards'(ie. Reduce number.of spaces). Prior to ~• t~' the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ~' ~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; .. ~ ~ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) Ll SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _/ All dimensions; !~` North arrow; / Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; / Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; /V Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; / All existing and proposed points of access; /~ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimer trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; I nr~tinn of nll nnhlir onll n.».,.~+.~ .,.,~......,..+~. ~~r i ]. 1 2QQ5 O~,t ~;,,j.. ,.. I , ~, ~y - ~ • ,_ .. ,,,..._ ~...: C'i ti ~~d ly Page 4 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater s Section E Stormwater Narrative The redevelopment plans for the property predominately consist of repair and maintenance to the interior units as well as repairs an~ minor- improvements to the exterior facade of an existing motel apartment structure which has been in service for over 50 years. The redevelopment plans for the property incorporate the existing parking, walks and drainage facilities with no changes to the existing grades or drainage structures on or adjacent to the subject property. There are no building additions or other changes to the existing impervious area of the site. Allowing a change of use as requested on this property will have no additional impact on the existing Stormwater facilities. ~~ ~~ OCT 17 2005 PI.P~MI~t~~ i~~~a;~3i~L~JT ~~~! nF c'! ~~„~~~~Ti:R Location of all street rights-of-way withlhd adjacent to the site; ~ • _/• Location of existing public and private utilities,. including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines,. manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _/ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; /~ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; ./ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; / Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; ~/ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. i7' SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular forrn: ,/ Land area in square feet and acres; _~ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; ./ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _/ Gross floor area devoted to each use; ,/ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; _/ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _/ Size and species of all landscape material; _/ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _/ Building and structure heights; ./ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. I~ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11) and color rendering if possible; FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H`LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) Q~ LANDSCAPE PLAN: _ All existing and proposed structures; ~ Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ,/ Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; ~if' Proposed and required parking spaces; ~~gisJ~ ~/ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); +~'~~ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; r/ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; i Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; 1" Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; ~/f" Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ~Ul~ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) (color rendering if possible); LTV/ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); L7 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. _ - ~' t~ ~_ .. .l . ~ 4/ ' ~ ~ t/ i.~ ..=.J ~~~ ~ 1.l 205 Page 5 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater_t r~ _ ~ ~ ~ ` "~'~?,J'!'!F+]~~ ' I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SU~ITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-20 .23) Required in-the event the application includes a developmentwhere design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ~UILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale 8 '/2 X 11 black and w ( ) ( hate and color rendering, if possible) as required. J./SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) Rf All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ~ ~' _._, ~~~ • ~ ^ Reduced signage proposal (8 %: X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) 'I :~~+~ R-a;,1----~ P~LAI ~6~Wr ,~ I3~~~.~~~~y~s~ O Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: ~1~ ~~ ~¢ ~''' ~+ r' ~ ' • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. r.~~a,;n~J • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ~~ Traffic Impact Study is not required. A/p CNAi~~ '!'~ ~f~~r'liNe s /T~ CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREM~+ENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this a~p~plic~ation~. ~ V I// Signature of property owfTE# orrepresentative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS S orn to and subscribed before e this ~30`~- day of A.D. 20 d ~ to me and/or by ' who is personally known has produced >= ~. 7~ /~ ~ a' as identi cation.- ~111111/~~ 0 ~'' "r •• Renee F. Koenig Notary public, *~ ~*r D0111061 EXP My commission expires: ±;F.,, .~~ December 6, 1007 ' qF i .. BONDED iHRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE INi Page 6 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater • AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of ai) props owners on deed - i. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following. described property {address or general location): -- 'fi'r f•_~tY SMwa~ t~~ 2. That this p-ope-h~ constitutes the property for which a request for a; {describe request) nu~_~~ ~i. - - 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint- e''wJ ~l~l.-N ~ t~l A7 1~~M1~~~ !Ttif ~ as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has bean executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and th ner out zes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and coned. COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, for m the undersigned an officer duly commis coned by t e laws of the St to of Fb_rida, o this D ses and says that~e/shepfu ly understa~ndsethe~ wnr~ ~s ~r,e ,tea...,:.._: ~_,_.^~!,'' day of . WGt.Y• /p(ho having been first d..w ~..,...., My Commission Expires: ~/ ~ ~r~+rrfi$ ~wnr T. SMALLWOpp"'~ ~riyec Cotntnbitprt/DD0191341 --~'i"T~~-E.~~ ~r (-.~rl~ I ~mim~a Bonded dtrough t (aoo-a32~zsa) Florida Notary gssn., Inc. •..••..u.uun.u.on.uu.....•..•.•.. ~.. u..u.w S.iPlanrurtg DeparhnenAApplicarion Formsldevelopmertt reviewl0exiblB stnndanY development a ~~ .`' 7 ! ~ T. "~ pplicafion residential infill 2005.doc ~ ~ ' uC- 1 '7 2Q05 CC ~~~a~~~ir.~~~r Page 7 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential infill 2005- City of Clearwater~'~ or ~~"" ~ ~~ • s' f~~ f1-~~,-, E'd LLBZ1rb6-LZL S3WOH ZFiIQ-NI~kiW d6S ~90 SO 6Z daS A~~'dd~~lVdT T® AUTHORIZE AGENT: (!'darr?es of all property owners on deed -please 4. 'fttat (! am/vee are) the owner(s) and record title holder{s) of the following described property (address or general location): ~'~' SH02.~ D2 ~e.a~tt~~rT~L F~.. 33?t~'7 2. 7h?t this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) ~. Yfaat ~ undersigned (has/have) appointed and {does/do) appoint: - S'~Ytl~ ReAGy1.T 1' ~1~ ~ (hisftheir} agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; d. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; ~. Yt;at site visit9 to the property are necessary by City representatives in Order t0 process this application and the owner authorizes City r~r sentBUves to visit aced photograph the property described in this application; 0. "ghat {Ilwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and Property C®t! Q~ ~iidEt_LAS I?efore rre ~!!e undersigned, an officer duly commis ~~ personally appeared 17e es acrd says that he/she furry understands the tvty Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA, the laws of the State of Florida, on this t~ R r.~roaa' ~ ra~t;~ ,. ~-n IJ-r t arm Who having been of the affidavit that he/sheCSi~gn,,ed. ~ 5..~ ~~~~ o. o Sandra Mane Futch Notary Publi day of duty sworn (', e~ ,..,,,mission DD3872pq "O~ E~P~res October 31 2008 ~1 ,_, ~ ~ , ~ ,..~ r $ ~pia'n!!lg ,Depaftrif8r~l.4pp/iG8ti6/1 Formsidevelopment revieaABexiWe standard deve/opmenr app/nation rosidenria/ inpll 2005.doC ~ ~-: ~= i ~ OCT 17 2005 . PL~1i~d11c~~,'~ 13~~.~~~t~~~ilT Page 7 of 7 -Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater ~-r"ti.~ r •~~~ 6ii~ SEP-29-2@@5 @3:41 PM HUGHES CONST 727 7899219 P.@1 Division of Corporations ~ ~ Page 1 of 2 ~Fiorida Limited Liability EAST SHORE LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 4.012 FLORIDA AVE TAMPA FL 33604 US --~----._...e-----. _~,~---.---- -------- 1VIAILIIVG ADDRESS P_O.BOX 93580 LAKELAND FL 33804 US Document Number FEI Number 1Jate Filed L05000063767 NONE 06/28!2005 State Status Effective Date FL ACTIVE 06/23/2005 Total Contribution 0.00 Registered Agent Name & Address US 19 ST PETE FL 33567 ManagerlMember Detail Name & Address Tide FELKER,ALAN 1;AST SHORE ) MGRM CLEARWATER FL 33755 US KRONEN, LEONARD ? EAST SHORE MGRM CLEARWATER FL 33755 US DIAZ: WARREN EAST SHORE ~ MGRM C1,EARWA7ER F2 33755 US "~f '~ . -•-~~ UV~~~~~~ V ~~ ~~ ~ 1 '~ 1005 PLAi~~~~ ,~ LLO„~~;~~'~~1T CITY QF ~~ ~;; ~,:;-,~ r=? http:J/www. sunbiz.orgJscripts/cordet.exe?a 1=DETFIL&n1=L05000063767&n2=0FFF WD... 8/31 /2005 ~SEP-27-2005 (TUE) 19:07 Bryan Sa ey P. A. THIS INSTRUMENT PREPAREA I3Y ANU 1tLl'U12N TO: Bryan J. Stanley, F~quire (FAX)727 461 1764 P. 001 /004 Bryan J. Stanley, P.~. KEN ~URKE, CLERK OF COURT 114 Turner Street PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA Clearwater, Florida 33756 INST~ 2005389869 0912712005 at 01:08 PM OFF REC BK:1~636 PG: 237,2377 DoeType:DEED RECORDING: f35.50 Parcel I.D. No. 08/29/15/16434/002/0150 D pOC STAMP: f9S20.00 SPECIAL WA-]tRAN'IY DEED THIS INDENTURE made this 20x1 day of September, 2005, by JOHN H. PIMENIDIS and CIIItISTINA PIMENIDIS, as husband and wife, (collectively "Grantor"), whose address is 4600 Marine Parkway, Building R, Apt. 104, New Port Richey, Florida 34652, for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases and conveys unto SUSAN DIIZECTOR AND EDWATtD EVORS, AS TRUSTEES OF THE L.IG FAMILY TRUST DATED JANUARY 1 1998 as to one-third (1/3) as a tenant in common ,whose address is ~~ D ~~~ ~yx rt 35~(7y L R/~. l .~{~ 3 3~~1Z~~---_ and EAST SH012E Y.AND DEVELOPMENP, LLC, a Florida Iimited liability company as to two-thirds (2/3's) as a tenant in common, whose address is 4012 Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33604, (collectively "Grantee"), the following described real property in the County of Pinellas, State of..Florida, to-wi.t: $ce Exhibit "'A" attached hereto and made a part hereof ("Property"). The Property does not constitute the homestead of Gxa.ntor. TOGEIt~YEYt with all the tenement, hereditament and appurtenances, with every privilege, right, title, interest and estate, reversion, remainder and casement thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE ANA TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor does hereby covenant that, except for the title exceptions set forth on Exhibit "S" attached hereto and made a part hereof, Grantor does fully warrant the title to the above described real estate so hereby conveyed and will defend the same against the lawful claims, arising out of events occurring prior to the recording of this Deed, of all persons claiming by, through or under the Grantor., but against none other. OCT 1 '7 205 ~ /~ ~ fin„ ~+ r~ * ~.., ~,.~ # PL1'i~iV S'1 ~a> ~':: ~ r.,v, ....+'lrT C~~ o~ ~~ ....,, . . _r.,di'.r.. '~ -SEP-27-2005 (TUE) 19 ~ 08 Bryan S~ l ey P. A. (FAX) 727 4~ 1764 P. 002/004 IN WTINESS WI~REOF, the Grantor aforesaid has set its hand anal seal as of the 20~~ day of September, 2005. Signed, sealed and delivered in vur presence as to both: i fitness ~ n7L'~ Print Name: Gt `t ~ c~ Witness Print Name: c~~ y . Ry2 ~ GRANTOR JOHN H. PIMEIVIDIS .. CHRISTII~IA rTIDIS STATfi OF FI..ORTDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20~ day of September, 2005, by JOHN >FL PIMEN'IDIS and CHRISTII~TA PIMEIVIDIS, as husband and wife, who are~personally known to me. eQ~ j SCOTT V E1' ~~ i A j g~~ Eanr*~~rertooe~ i q~i _ o,,,e.e nN ~oeey~u.zs4: d ~K/Ip~No~ry /W., IMF Notary Public - (Signature) Print Name: Sca1T V. /3d~2v7~ My Commission Expires: OCi 17 2005 PL.P-i~ '~,"- ,.tom,.-'~-, 4 ,,. SEP-27-2005 (TUE) 19 ~ 08 Bryan Sl ey P. A. (FAX) 727 4~ 1764 P. 003/004 E7~iIBIT "A" PROPERTY LOT 15, BLOCK B, A RE-PLAT OP BLOCK "A", AND LOTS 1 TO T5 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK "B" OF CLEARWATER BEACl~ PARK FIRST ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT TI~EREOF, RL-CORDBD IN PLAT BOOK 21, PAGE(S) 21, PUBLIC RL--CORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PICT 1 '7 205 PI,.At~ 1„~ ,.. ~,_,, , ,~.; . ~i~t'I iii' J,. _-,-.~~„~!:e.s T 3 ~SEP-27-2005 (TUE) 19 ~ 08 Bryan S~ l ey P. A. (FAX) 727 4~ 1764 P. 004/004 )E7QIIBIT "B" PEItMTI'TEU EXCEPTIONS 1. The Iien of the taxes for the year 2005 and aI1 subsequent years, wltich are not yet due and payable. 2. Provisions of the A Re-Plat of Block "A' and Lots 1 to 75 incl. Block "B" of Plat of Clearwater Beach Park First Addition, recorded in Plat Book 27, Page 21 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 3. All or a part of the Property may be artificially filled-in land in what were formerly navigable waters. Therefore, this conveyance is subject to the rights of the United States Government and the State of Florida arising by reason of the United States Government's control over navigable waters in the interest of navigation and commerce and the inalienable rights of the State of Florida in the lands and waters of such character, OCT 1 '7 205 ~~~ a~ 4 j ESTIMATED COST OF RECONSTRUCTION/IMPROVEMENT P.arcet# D S ~ Z9 ~ I ~ ,~ 16434 ~ ooz ~ ©Iso ~` ~O EAST SrltartE D2 - C:~.EgRt~~AT~Ri ~ 3 ~SZ ~6~1 Thist~vst ~y°a licensed General Contractor ,• v v v v t/ v _ REIKS - CD3T RECONIREP~41R - _Rr4Ti0 OF 3NOR~f - -: OFFICIAL USE _- i ~R- _ . - t 3so.o0 - ~ -- . I Z.O . 00 - -. 4ooa.oo -, . a o , ob -.. _ .. SOD • pp . --._ .. .. _~... _ 1 ~ 00 - _- . .. __- _ ._. ~ ~ ~~ .- _ 4 ,~ _ . __ !fn '1 0. _._.... - b OO•QO -- ~ d - t 'S o .eo -- -trr - . OO -- -- ~ Z 15.0 . oo - - (~ P~~~~~y~ i4 ~..srlr~-,f ~.~VI Demo d_ ~ 5'00.. ~r1Y 3,.; - s ~,9 ~`r :~~:r.l~'~~ - oKetheat! and Profit_ TD'T~C ~ ~ ar'~°'O° Z t A So. oo /3 9~ 3~ $6 °d ADDITIONAL WFORMATION) Contractor Name: S~t1-E'13oyF~A~ Contractor Li~. #: CgG t 25L9 t 4 Address: 153.8 Crt ar,e~v t~~/r~u t~wa,T Phocre.#: '~ ZT - S 3S - 2_004- ,.. - Sislnature: ~_ i~ ~~~ Date: Z9 ~ - COOL BREEZE SCOPE OF WORK GENERAL REQUIREMENTS - Plans and blueprints required for permitting - Building permit fees - Temporary electric, water and sewer facilities - Trash removal and dumpster fees - Final cleanup of project site and living units - Builders Risk premium cost SITEWORK /DEMOLITION ~'~ Remove existing cabinets ~/ Remove existing appliances /- Remove existing floor coverings ~' Remove existing plumbing fixtures - Remove existing AC units - Remove existing furnaces ~' Remove existing furnishings ~' Remove existing ceramic the Remove existing shelving ~' Remove existing hardware Remove existing light fixtures - Remove existing windows - Remove existing stairs - Remove existing ornamental iron columns - Remove existing sundeck - Landscape and Irrigation Allowance ($4500.00) - Re-surface and re-stripe existing parking - Install thin set pavers on common breezeways - Install brick pavers in courtyard MASONRY - Architectural foam trim bands per plan - Stucco columns per plan METALS - Aluminum balcony railings per plan - Replace steel stair stringers and treads WOOD & PLASTICS ~` Install new wood front kitchen cabinetry - Frame new exterior column surrounds - Frame new parapet wall at office roof ©r~ 1 ~~ X005 ~ q ~., .• ----, 2 i ,,i~.r.~::+ r: COOL BREEZE SCOPE OF WORK - Install new pressure treated sundeck - Frame interior niches per plan THERMAL /MOISTURE PROTECTION - Install new membrane roofing at ofrice/sundeck - • Install new metal roofing at parapet wall per plan DOORS & WINDOWS - Install new aluminum frame windows with storm protection Install new door hardware Install new shower enclosures ~ Install new mirrors FINISHES ,~ Repair/refinish drywall as required ~' Install solid surface countertops in kitchens ~ Install new ceramic the floors per plan f Install new ceramic showers per plan Install new carpet per plan ~ Paint complete interior y Paint complete exterior SPECIALTIES ~ Install new postal mailboxes ~ Install new toilet accessories ~ Install new shelving EQUIPMENT ~ Install new gas range ~ Install new refrigerator f' Install new microwave oven MECHANICAL ~. Install new low volume commodes ~ Install new pedestal lavatories ~' Install new stainless steel kitchen sinks `=~ Install new shower trims - Install new ductless multi-split heat pump SGT 17 7C~5 CI~1f t~~ ~~ ~: ` ..., , ~r..C r: r. ~"+~ • .w- Planning and Development Services ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND N~TARIZEDAPPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION includingfolded site plan COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revised 9/19/2001) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-1001) APPLICANT NAME: E4ST SItOl1L ~~ DC11C't.6dI~C'+~ah>~ f.~ln.\.I MAILING ADDRESS: ~ ~ Z ~LG/Q.~ DA~ Ar1/E 1 /~a~ONN }~-~ '3 36of PHONE NUMBER: 'l j,.'1 - S3S" 20l~4' FAX NUMBER: T Z? ~ S3L_ 6728 PROPERTY OWNER(S): SJS/~1o-1191Rt'L7~I,. h+Na BVbrt,6 AS 72~57c''1:°S lret_ L.~ .F+?'~''t ~~N (Must include ALL owners) T'2y T ,~~_C~'1ST 7ls/K~ LA~1~ ~c~Zr-~rc>~ LLG AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) _ STz'1!L'~ ~~Filrwe..n MAILING ADDRESS: ~ S3S ~f~7L14t~ ~/~.L-t GAT PHONE NUMBER: '2 L'! ' ~Z' (~ 24' FAX NUMBER: 1Z7 ~ ~';p7'L$ The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plalss~sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addi"tiori to~the=lnformatiori' provided on this worksheet: ~~~~~~~ ~V,'~-~~ Architectural Theme. CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: / SOUTH: / WEST: / EAST: / UE:~T 1 ~ 2005 a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as mart of the archit~ctural:~ i theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for,the'developmer#.' '~..~;_;~ Tk~,J C1c t 'hN~ ,~~ eo>w>,rT, ak-s ~.r.. r 'I~.r= L..~..aes~,~.n~~r1- ~,It`/1 t~%4~ t~~~..~~x. t~wl C ~-~~ ~ I1A,1 L/ NG ~G ~i Jr!'~~it~y,rA ©~ .A-A+T1 = 'Jt.~+rs ~lLr1w~ T~,~ ~'1cnTi~ Gow~~T~o~•+3 100 South Myrtle Avenue ~, ~~ Te ephoner 7271562 4567 ,.~~.~~~~,,,~~,,.~y~,,~~ ~,-..~~~, Fax:727-562-4576 ~: .. • • OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. C~L~~~.~, ,,~ acs 1 ~ ~~~~ r+1s~~w1•~... ~`1 ~~~ ~~ ~>f ~r.:L~~.r::.W'~~ ~ ~ • 4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive- Landscape- Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. 1"Lz~tS~ SEL' iPc~J .. , ~~,~~ ~~ ~ -,~ li ~~, ~'~~~ ~~ Ci~:1 1 ~ t~LS ~ /~ ewe...@y- ~,••~ _~ ,6•vWarGV . ,~•. ~~~ ~Y' 1Jy,f~~nn e i Please return checklist for review and verification. Date: o ~~~' Q I'1~ (Signature of applicant) S: application forms/development review/comprehensive landscape program application.doc • • ~ CITY OF CI,EARWATER ,~i, ~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES oQ 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 .99~ ~~~ Phone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 A LANDSCAPE PT..AN REQUIREMENTS ADDRESS ~'4'O ER+I~ S,ioR.~ L7R... Cr,e>~e,c,s~~_ ~L 33?6~ Except in the Tourist and Downtown Districts, landscaping shall be required in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 Division 12 for the following development: 1. All development and the redevelopment or reconfiguration of an surface off-street parking facility. 2. All development within designated scenic corridors. 3. The expansion of the floor area of an existing nonresidential or multifamily structure. Your plans will not be processed 'rf any of the items listed below are incomplete or missing. An application for any proposed work becomes void if a permit is not issued within six (6) months of the date submitted. A plans review fee is due upon submittal. Three (3~) copies of the landscape plan must be submitted showing the following information: = 1. All proposed structure and improvements, including but not limited to walls, fences, walks, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, easements, sign locations, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape; ~2. Name of abutting street rights-of-way; ~3. Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations, and drainage structures and other drainage improvements; /4. Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers including sight triangles, if any; __/5. Delineation of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing; /V~~"6. Proposed and required parking spaces; ~~977~ Existing trees on site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including dripline; _~' 8. Location, size, description, specfication and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; ~9. Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs, and ground cover plants, including planting instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching, staking and protective measures; ~10. Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet ,exclusive of perimeter landscape strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas; _ 11. An irrigation plan for all development requiring Level Two and Three approval; III ]~ Any conditions of development approval; _ 13. Any other information that may be needed to show compliance with the provisions of Article 3 Division 12. _r.: t .. r:....+~ • For Sites acre or greater in size or sites having 150' or more of street frontage, the following information is required: - 1. A scaled drawing showing the finished elevation of all landscape material proposed to be planted with perimeter landscape buffers adjacent to street rights-of-way. The drawing shall be an artistic rendering of the proposed landscape material as it will appear at the time of installation and will provide a °snapshot" of the overall appearance of the landscape material. The drawing shall include a rendering of all trees, shrubs and groundcovers and should incude structures such as walls, fences, signage, benches, utility ~oles or other structures with the required buffers; 2. Dimensional measurements showing the height from finished grade of all landscape materials utilized in the landscape buffers. Please return check list for review and verification. Date: __ ~O ~_ (signature of a plicant) S: applicaUOn forms/development review/landsape Plan Requirements.doc j 1' 1 .. ~ ~ ` 1 i ~ ~~: ~~ ~ ~ ZaoS PLI~~~~~~~~ ~®.,,.~., °~~~ ~T ~~~ ~~'g FLS2005-10082 440 EAST SHORE DR Date Received: 10/27/2005 EAST SHORE LAND DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ~[~C~f~999~~ OCT 17 2t~05 ATLAS PAGE: 267A PLANNING DEP,gRTMENT CI1Y OF CLEARWATER PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT_ENTERED _ CLWCoverSheet S~,ptor 10/27/2005 '`I`' ~ ~ ~ Receipt #: 1200500000000010708 1:oo:32PM ~p = r Date: 10/27/2005 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLS2005-10082 03 Flex Std-Commercial 010-341262 475.00 Line Item Total: $475.00 Payments: • Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check MALIN DIAZ HOMES INC R_D 1267 In Person 475.00 Payment Total: $475.00 rr•~ ~ +r•~r ~+ ~~' i ~ -~ ocr 1 ~ Zao~ ~7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 .~;~~' ,~ -~- .~ ;~q ' . J ~~~ »'wsra LONG RANGE I~I.ANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW March 8, 2006 Steven Robert Bouffard 1538 Chateau Deville -Court Clearwater, Florida 33764 CITY OF CLEAIZWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFI'ICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-47423 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWA"I'F,R, FLORIDA 33756 Tra.ErHONe: (727) 562-4.567 FAx (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-10082 at 440 East Shore Dr (East Shore Land Development). Dear Mr. Bouffard: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 8, 2005, the Development Review Committee reviewed your request for Flexible Standard Development approval to permit renovations to an existing overnight accommodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.B at 440 East Shore Drive. The Development Review Committee (DRC) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as an overnight accommodation use, per Section 2-803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Beach By Design standards in the Code. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the use of this property will continue to be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 consecutive days. At the request of the City Manager or designee, the records of the business shall be made available for examination to determine whether the length of stay complies with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines, revocation of the occupational license and/or any other enforcement afforded by law or by City regulations. A license must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of 1=lotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby shall be maintained. This development shall not be deemed PRANK HIISI1nKO, MAYOR I3n.1.JonsoN, Vicr:-MnY01( ~olw Doww, COIiNC1IyIliyII;r:R Horr Hnnall:rON, C(~uNCU.rou:rouslaz ® GUtLIiN A. Pr:rr:Its1:N, COUNCII_~tl•:~1111iK "I:QUAI. FMPLOYMIiN'I' nND API~IR~4A"I'IVIi ACTION I;MPLOI'I?R" March 8, 2006 FLD2005-10082 -Page 2 attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall individual units qualify for homestead exemption tax credits; 2. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC; and 4. That all signage be consistent to the design/colors submitted and comply with the requirements of the signage portion of the Community Development Code and Beach By Design. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the one above-mentioned condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the application, colored elevations dated received October 17, 2005, the revised building elevations dated received February 15, 2006, and revised landscape plan and plan coversheet dated received March 6, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of . Flexible Standard Development approval (March 8, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner I at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater. com. Sincerely, ~ ,/ -~ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S.•IPlanning DepnrtmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Vnactive or Finished CaseslEast Shore 440 East Shore Lnnd Development (T) -12.8.05 DRC - jvsIFLD2005-10082 Development Order.doc F. ~~ - - -~' ' .. ,, ~~ s,, LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVLiL,OPMENT REVIEW March 8, 2006 Steven Robert Bouffard 1538 Chateau Devine Court Clearwater, Florida 33764 CITY OF C LEARWATE.R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICE'S BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATF,R, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-10082 at 440 East Shore Dr (East Shore Land Development). Dear Mr. Bouffard: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 8, 2005, the Development Review Committee reviewed your request for Flexible Standard Development approval to permit renovations to an existing overnight accommodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.B at 440 East Shore Drive. The Development Review Committee (DRC) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as an overnight accommodation use, per Section 2-803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Beach By Design standards in the Code. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the use of this property will continue to be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 consecutive days. At the request of the City Manager or designee, the records of the business shall be made available for examination to determine whether the length of stay complies with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines, revocation of the occupational license and/or any other enforcement afforded by law or by City regulations. A license must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby shall be maintained. This development shall not be deemed I~KnNI( )-I11313nK1), )V1n7'()It I3u.L JoraoN, Vu:r•.-Ivlnvol( Jolty I)(>KAN, CouN<:u au•:auir:K I-IDYL' 1~IA\11I:f(>N, C,<)UNCILMIiMIilSlt ® ~ Cr\KS.SiN A. Pli"I"I:IaIiN, C.OIiNCIL:UIi\IISh:K ~~ISQUAI" I;MI'LOYMIiN'I' nND AI'I'IK(\9n'I'IVIi ACI"ION I;MI'L(»"b:R~~ March 8, 2006 FLD2005-10082 -Page 2 attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall individual units qualify for homestead exemption tax credits; 2. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC; and 4. That all signage be consistent to the design/colors submitted and comply with the requirements of the signage portion of the Community Development Code and Beach By Design. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the one above-mentioned condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the application, colored elevations dated received October 17, 2005, the revised building elevations dated received February 15, 2006, and revised landscape plan and plan coversheet dated received March 6, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of . Flexible Standard Development approval (March 8, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that maybe required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner I at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater. com. Sincerely, - ~~ ~~ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslEast Shore 440 East Shore Land Development (T) -12.8.05 DRC - jvsIFLD2005-/0082 Development Order.doc 1 + a • A ~w~ ., . ~ .,~~~ r, ~~~ . op ( Ij' F LONG RANGE I~I,ANNING DFVIiLOPMENT REVIEW March 8, 2006 Steven Robert Bouffard 1538 Chateau Devine Court Clearwater, Florida 33764 CITY O F C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CI,FARWATER, FI,OLtIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICIiS BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CI,EARWAT'ER, FLORIDA 33756 Tf:I.F,PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-10082 at 440 East Shore Dr (East Shore Land Development). Dear Mr. Bouffard: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 8, 2005, the Development Review Committee reviewed your request for Flexible Standard Development approval to permit renovations to an existing overnight accommodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.B at 440 East Shore Drive. The Development Review Committee (DRC) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible StanBard Development criteria as an overnight accommodation use, per Section 2-803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Beach By Design standards in the Code. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the use of this property will continue to be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 consecutive days. At the request of the City Manager or designee, the records of the business shall be made available for examination to determine whether the length of stay complies with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines, revocation of the occupational license and/or any other enforcement afforded by law or by City regulations. A license must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby shall be maintained. This development shall not be deemed PRANK HIISISnI2I), Mnvoll I3u.l.JonsoN, Vua: MnvoR JoIIN I)ORAN, C(nm(:n.~u:ausr:R H(>rr Hni~411aY)N, C<xIN(:u.Men+ISlaz ® CARLIiN A. Pr.nazsl:N, CcxlNC:n nu:nuiltR ~~I:Ql1Al, EMPLOYMI:N'I' AND API~IRMA"CIVI{ A(IION I:D1PLOYI{R~~ March 8, 2006 FLD2005-10082 -Page 2 attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall individual units qualify for homestead exemption tax credits; 2. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC; and 4. That all signage be consistent to the design/colors submitted and comply with the requirements of the signage portion of the Community Development Code and Beach By Design. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the one above-mentioned condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the application, colored elevations dated received October 17, 2005, the revised building elevations dated received February 15, 2006, and revised landscape plan and plan coversheet dated received March 6, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of . Flexible Standard Development approval (March 8, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that maybe required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner I at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater. com. Sincerely, _---- ,~,,~/ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Vnactive or Finisher! CaseslEast Shore 440 East Shore Land Development (T) -12.8.05 DRC - jvsIFLD2005-/0082 Development Order.doc ~. 1'l 4,~ ~ s 1l0 -- * ,~ ._ - . . ~~ y' ' 'A ~ ' E R ~ ~' ' 4 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW March 8, 2006 Steven Robert Bouffard 1538 Chateau Deville -Court Clearwater, Florida 33764 ~ ~ CITY O F C LEARWATE R PLANNIING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4740, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVF;NUF., CLEf+RWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-10082 at 440 East Shore Dr (East Shore Land Development). Dear Mr. Bouffard: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 8, 2005, the Development Review Committee reviewed your request for Flexible Standard Development approval to permit renovations to an existing overnight accommodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.B at 440 East Shore Drive. The Development Review Committee (DRC) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as an overnight accommodation use, per Section 2-803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Beach By Design standards in the Code. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the use of this property will continue to be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 consecutive days. At the request of the City Manager or designee, the records of the business shall be made available for examination to determine whether the length of stay complies with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines, revocation of the occupational license and/or any other enforcement afforded by law or by City regulations. A license must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby shall be maintained. This development shall not be deemed I~icnNh HiisiLniti>, Ntnvc~ic F3u.i.JonsoN, Vu:r-Mnroic Joiw I~oRnw, COlit~CIL~11iA1I31iR Horr HAbfll:f<)N, CcxiN<:u.nvtUiiial ® Cnia.eN A. Prrr:RSeN, Ccx~~c;n nu:nn;ric {• March 8, 2006 ~ry FLD2005-10082 -Page 2 attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall individual units qualify for homestead exemption tax credits; 2. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC; and 4. That all signage be consistent to the design/colors submitted and comply with the requirements of the signage portion of the Community Development Code and Beach By Design. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the one above-mentioned condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the application, colored elevations dated received October 17, 2005, the revised building elevations dated received February 15, 2006, and revised landscape plan and plan coversheet dated received March 6, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of . Flexible Standard Development approval (March 8, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that maybe required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner I at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www. myclearwater. com. Sincerely, -- ~~~ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: IPlnnning DepnrtmentlC D BlFlex Stnndnrd (FLS)Ilnnctive or Finished CnseslEnst Shore 440 Enst Shore Land Development (T) -/2.8.05 DRC - jvsIFLD2005-10082 Development Order.doc i Mar. 09 2006 08:49AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95366728 Mar. 09 08:48AM 01'02 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-~0-HELP-FAX C435-7329). Malin-Diaz Homes Inc. 1538 Chateaux DeVille Court Clearwater, Florida 33764 Office: (727) 535-2004 Fax: (727) 536-6728 Mr John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 March 6, 2006 RE: FLS 2005-10082 Located at 440 East Shore Dr /East Shore Land Development Deaz Mr. Schodtler, With regard the above referenced project application, this addendum is in response to the outstanding issues listed in your fax of 2/21/06: Landscape Curbing 1. The existing bed azeas abutting the existing pazking are currently protected with raised curbing (photos attached). With the exception of some minor curb removal to accommodate the new handicap pazking stall, new landscape beds that abut parking will be protected with curb or wheel stops in accordance with Section 3-1204.D Landscape 1. Revised plan attached with landscape and irrigation notes (2 sets) Traffic Engineering: 1. Revised site plan attached reflecting the creation of a handicap pazking space with sign and stall details (2 sets) As always, I appreciate your assistance in this matter and should you have any other questions or require additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. With kindest regazds, ~~-e Steve Bouffazd Vice-President ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~A~ 0 6 2006 PLp,NNING D~~~~ ~ ~~~ CI rY OF C.. WHITE BORDER & SYMBOL BLUE BAGKGROUND BLACK BORDER 8e LETTERS WHIiE BAGKGROUND BLACK BORDER do LETTERS WHITE BACKGROUND ALL LETTERS 1" SERIES "C" ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAC 0 6 2006 ~NING DEPARTMENT M'•~~• ;A M'•• ~•` I' ~III~ STANDARD PRE-PAINTED bISABLED PARKING SIGN ON 1 /8" THICK SHEET ALUMINUM 2" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL PIPE -8"X2'-8" CONCRETE MASS. FlNISH TOP OF MASS LEVEL WRH A SLIGHT RAISED WASH APPROXIMATELY 1/2" ABOVE ~ LEVEL OF TURF/SOD. iY OF CLEARWATER 8" ~--1~1011~ IC~4fi~~'~1~ SIC-~~i 1~~1'~f ~ 1 12/99 Updoted Flne REV. DAiE DESCRIP710N M.D. APP. CITY OF PUBLIC 8Y FLORIDA ~TRATION ND, 9 N0. 1 OF 1 rJ~-t HANDICAPPED SIGN f SEE INDEX N0. 119 CONC. WALK RAMP DOWN CONC. WALK SEE INDEX NO. 108 ~STRIPEE(T~YPAICdI) BLUE I I I I ~ 87RIPEE(T~YPAICAL) ~I~ TRAFFIC WHITE srROKe ~rrPICAL> NOTE: All pavement markings to be thermoplastic. z• (Twlca) ~I I ORIGINA!_ RECEIVED BAR D 6 2006 HANDIGAPPEp STALL pETAIL PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ,trce`t . ,.~~~,'~~~~~~~;~~ Conditions Associated With " ~°` FLS2005-10082 ` 440 EAST SHORE DR ~~~'~~FfR ~C~~``+ *.,..e,~ Landscape Curbing Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 02/16/2006 The newly revised plan does not show or note protective curbing around the landscaping near the Not Met parking lot. Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 02/16/2006 The revised landscape plan is missing: 1)Landscaping notes (florida grade #1 or better, etc...) and Not Met 2) updated irrigation notes or plans. 02/16/2006 Caution should be taken with the proposed sabal palm so close to the overhead wires coming to Not Met the building from the East Shore R.O.W. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 11/18/2005 1. Provide required number of disabled parking spaces compliant with Florida Accessibility Code Not Met for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.1.2. 2/18/06 -NOT MET 2. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118) 2/18/06 -NOT MET 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. 2/18/06 -NOT MET 4. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. 2/18/06 -NOT MET 5. Provide a parking table including required parking and number of spaces provided. 2/18/06 - MET 6. Show dimensions of drive aisles and parking stalls. 2/18/06 -MET All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O.. Print Date: 02/21/2006 Page 1 of 1 CaseConditons • • Clearwater FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ~ T£V 6 rl ~2 ~D V ~~'Arzf~ FAX: 53G _l~~28 Phone: FROM: ...~ o u a 5 • Phone: DATE: O z z- o [o SUBJECT: 9-4o F.A~'sT SHt~R~ MESSAGE: ~~TES T GOMM6~"T ~ NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 'Z Feb. 21 2006 08:20AM YOUR LOGO . YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95366728 Feb. 21 08:19AM 00'52 SND 02 OK TO TU4~J OFF REPORT, PRESS ' MEhILI' #04. TF®V SELECT OFF BY IE;ING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX 0435-73291. • Malin-Diaz Homes, Inc. 1538 Chateaux DeVille Court Clearwater, Florida 33764 Office: (727) 535-2004 Fax: (727) 536-6728 Mr John Schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 February 15, 2006 RE: FLS 2005-10082 Located at 440 East Shore Dr /East Shore Land Development Dear Mr. Schodtler, With regard the above referenced project application, this addendum is in response to the comments listed in the Development Review Agenda from our 12/08/05 DRC meeting: General Engineering: 1. A Certified Appraisal prepazed by Todd Marr & Associates was previously submitted reflecting a current value of the depreciated structure in the amount of $527,671.00. The proposed cost of remodeling and improvements exclusive of maintenance related items is $97,804.00 therefore the project falls below the 25% threshold requirement for pazking changes. Environmental: Fire: 1. No issues were noted 1. T'he attached drawings have been revised to reflect the inclusion of an approved monitored fire alarm system. A separate fire alarm plan will be submitted to the Fire Mazshall for review and approval. Harbormaster: 1. No comments were noted Legal: 1. No comments were noted Land Resources: 1. No issues were noted ORIGINAL RECENED ~~~ 1 ~ 2006 PLANNiNf~ s:~~r ~~i~itVIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Landscaping: 1. We will remove the existing ficus trees and replace them with palms. A revised landscape plan and colored landscape elevation are attached. ~ ~ ~ Parks and Recreation: 1. No issues were noted ORIGINAL RECEIVED Stormwater: FEB 151Q06 1. No issues were noted PLANNING DEPARTMENT Solid Waste: CITY OF CLEARWATER 1. No comments were noted Traffic Engineering: 1. Not Applicable as the project is under the 25% cost threshold 2. Not Applicable as the project is under the 25% cost threshold 3. Not Applicable as the project is under the 25% cost threshold 4. Not Applicable as the project is under the 25% cost threshold 5. The existing motel parking table is shown on the title sheet site plan attached 6. The existing motel parking stall dimensions are shown on the title sheet site plan attached Planning: 1. The overall building height is 18'-0"above grade and shown~on sheet 7/A2 2. Acknowledgement is hereby made that the property will continue to be used for overnight accommodations meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 consecutive days. The property will be operated under license obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A separate registration lobby shall be '~, maintained and this development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units nor shall any units qualify for homestead exemption tax credits. 3: T1ie ISR-of the existinglproposed•parking:is-_81 and,is,shown on the title sheet of revised drawings attacfied 4. A Certified Appraisal prepared by Todd Marr & Associates was previously „D,~ ~ I " submitted reflecting a current value of the depreciated structure in the amount of $527,671.00. The proposed cost of remodeling and improvements exclusive l(~'~/ 1 of maintenance related items is $97,804.00 therefore the project falls below the 25% threshold requirement for parking changes. Other: $1. The existing 10 unit motel is not changing use and is receiving minor alterations and renovations that fall under the 25% improvement threshold. No site changes are proposed that would negatively impact or alter the existing pedestrian friendliness. Substantial landscaping improvements and aesthetic improvements to the building (i.e. new paint, doors and windows will enhance and improve the pedestrian experience from the current status. $2. The final design and color of the building will be consistent with the elevations submitted to or as modified and approved by the DRC. • • $3 The color of the dwelling unit doors will be changed to another selection from the approved color palate. $4 Since the structure is receiving only minor cosmetic exterior alterations it is impossible to fully renovate the building in a highly decorative tropical vernacular. The existing building elevation will however be significantly "cleaned-up" and the proposed alterations follow design principles that lean towards "tropical modern". The planned additional tropical landscaping and new color schemes provide consistent integration with the tropical beach theme and surrounding properties. $5 The proposed additional landscaping to be planted along East Shore Drive will provide a softer buffer to the street and pedestrian walkways than currently exists. The proposed landscape in conjunction with the building facade improvements along Papaya and Poinsettia Streets also meet this criteria by providing a cleaner, safer and substantially more inviting visage than that offered by the existing premises. I appreciate your assistance in this matter and should you have any other questions or require additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. With kindest regards, ~~i~--~ Steve Bouffard Vice-President ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEa 15 2006 PIANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEp,RWATER .~ CITY OF CLEARWATER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 January 30, 2006 STEVEN R BOUFFARD 1538 CHATEAU DEVILLE COURT CLEARWATER, FL 33764 RE: FLS2005-10082 (LOCATED AT 440 EAST SHORE DR) Dear Owner/Representative: There has been no activity with regards to your application, under case number (FLS2oo5-10082) in the last thirty (30) days. Please find attached comments related to this case that are still outstanding. Please contact our office with the status of your resubmittal prior to February 28, 2006. Please contact Sherry Watkins at 727-562-4582 should you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, ~tti-. John Schodtler, Planner I Cc: File C:\Documents and Settings\john.Schodtler\Desktop\30DayLtrPing.rpt ~ ,, ,,; ~~ ~ ~ Conditions Associated With ~-~'~`~~"~~ , , #~ ~ °~~ FLS2005-10082 ~9 ~i _ 440 EAST SHORE DR ~~ ~"~ ~~+'' Beach By Design John Schodtler 727-562-4547 11/28/2005 Clarify, how Beach By Design, design criteria #7 has been met. (To ensure that the street level of Not Met all buildings is pedestrian friendly.) 11/28/2005 That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations Not Met submitted to, or as modified by, the DRC; 11/28/2005 Revise the possible color of the dwelling unit doors (big country blue) to something less intense. Not Met See the Beach By Design color palette (p. 67) for more muted suggestions. 11/28/2005 Clarify, how Beach By Design, design criteria #1 has been met: (To ensure that the proposed Not Met design is aesthetically pleasing architecture in a tropical vernacular.) 11/28/2005 Clarify, how Beach By Design, design criteria #2 has been met. (To create inviting, human scale Not Met "places" at the street level of all buildings.) Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4773 11/28/2005 1. In accordance with Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1401.6., existing parking Not Met lots shall be brought into full compliance if an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25 percent or more of the valuation of the existing principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records. If this condition is satisfied, all requirements of CDC Section 3-1402. must be met. The above shall be addressed prior to DO. Fire Condition 11 /18/2005 11 /18/2005 Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 12/02/2005 Staff suggests the removal of the existing ficus trees and replacing them with cedars or palms Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 Not Met Not Met 11/18/2005 1. Provide required number of disabled parking spaces compliant with Florida Accessibility Code Not Met for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.1.2. 2. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118) 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. 4. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. 5. Provide a parking table including required parking and number of spaces provided. Print Date: 01/30/2006 General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. This review is not a review for building permit. Additional items will be required during that process. A monitored fire alarm system shall be installed and sound levels must achieve 75db at pillow level. Acknowledge PRIOR TO DO Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3062 Not Met CaseConditons Page 1 of 2 ,.. FLS2005-10082 440 EAST SHORE DR Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 6. Show dimensions of drive aisles and parking stalls. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O.. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 562-4775 727-562-4547 11/28/2005 Revise building elevations to include the building height, dimensioned. (Provide one set) Not Met 11/28/2005 Acknowledge in writing the following: 1. That the use of this property will continue to be for Not Met overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 consecutive days. 2. That a license will be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professiorial Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. 3. That a registration lobby shall be maintained. 4. That this development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall individual units qualify for homestead exemption tax credits. 11/28/2005 Provide existing and proposed Impervious Surface Ratios (ISR) for the property. Not Met 12/02/2005 Existing developed lots not meeting the requirements contained in the parking, landscaping, and Not Met signage sections of the Code shall be brought into full compliance if the existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25 percent or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records. The data submitted indicates the 25 percent threshold has been exceeded. An option would be to reduce the scope of work of this project to below the 25 percent threshold and then come in after 12 months to request the remainder of the improvements as a second project. Print Date: 01/30/2006 "°Page2of2' CaseConditons ,~, i Jan. 30 2006 09:56AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95366728 Jan. 30 09:55AM 01'10 SND 03 OK TO TURN DFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLFA.SE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). 1:25 pm J 'F i ~` ~~ • Case Number: FLS2005-10082 - 440 EAST SHORE DR Owner(s): East Shore Land Development Representative: Steven R Bouffard 1538 Chateau Deville Court Clearwater, Fl 33764 TELEPHONE: 727-535-2004, FAX: 727-536-6728, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 0.133 acres located at the northwest corner of East Shore Drive and Papaya Street. 40]2 Florida Ave Tampa, Fl 33604 TELEPHONE: 727-535-2004, FAX: 727-536-6728, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant East Shore Land Development 4012 Florida Ave Tampa, Fl 33604 TELEPHONE: 727-535-2004, FAX: 727-536-6728, E-MAIL: No Emaii Request:. Flexible Standard Development approval to permit renovations to an existing overnight accomodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood 440 West, Inc. Condominium Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 440 S Gulfview Blvd #203 TELEPHONE: 461-2885, FAX: 442-6628, E-MAIL: et440@juno.com Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 1 . 1. In accordance with Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1401.B., existing parlang lots shall be brought into full compliance if an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25 percent or more of the valuation of the existing principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records. If this condition is satisfied, all requirements of CDC Section 3-1402. must be met. The above shall be addressed prior to DO. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . 1) No Issues. Fire: Z 1 . This review is not a review for building permit. Additional items will be required during that process. 2 . A monitored fire alarm system shall be installed and sound levels must achieve 75db at pillow level. Acknowledge PRIOR TO DO Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Development Review Agenda -Thursday, December 8, 2005 -Page 27 f!~ e ~ h. k Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: 1 , Staff suggests the removal of the existing ficus trees and replacing them with cedars or palms. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues -interior renovations to existing 10 units. Stormwater: 1 . No Issues. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 _ I .Provide required number of disabled parking spaces compliant with Florida Accessibility . Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section l 1-4.3.2. 2. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118) 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. 4. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.2. 5. Provide a parking table including required parking and number of spaces provided. 6. Show dimensions of drive aisles and parking stalls. All of the. above to be addressed prior to a D.O.. Planning: 1 . Revise building elevations to include the building height, dimensioned. (Provide one set) 2 . Acknowledge in writing the following: 1. That the use of this property will continue to be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 consecutive days. 2. That a license will be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. 3. That a registration lobby shall be maintained. 4. That this development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall individual units qualify for homestead exemption tax credits. 3 . Provide existing and proposed Impervious Surface Ratios (ISR) for the property. 4 . Existing developed lots not meeting the requirements contained in the parking, landscaping, and signage sections of the Code shall be brought into full compliance if the existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25 percent or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records. The data submitted indicates the 25 percent threshold has been exceeded. An option would be to reduce the scope of work of this project to below the 25 percent threshold and then come in after 12 months to request the remainder of the improvements as a second project. Other: $1 . Clarify, how Beach By Design, design criteria #7 has been met. (To ensure that the street level of all buildings is pedestrian friendly.) $2 . That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the DRC; $3 , Revise the possible color of the dwelling unit doors (big country blue) to something less intense. See the Beach By Design color palette (p. 67) for more muted suggestions. $4 . Clarify, how Beach By Design, design criteria #1 has been met. (To ensure that the proposed design is aesthetically pleasing architecture in a tropical vernacular.) $5 . Clarify, how Beach By Design, design criteria #2 has been met. (To create inviting, human scale "places" at the street level of all buildings.) Notes: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, December 8, 2005 -Page 28 . ~ • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 December O5, 2005 BOUFFARD, STEVEN 1538 CHATEAU DEVILLE COURT CLEARWATER FL 33764 RE: FLS2005-10082 LOCATED AT 440 EAST SHORE DR - EAST SHORE LAND DEVELOPMENT Dear STEVEN BOUFFARD: The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee (PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLS2005-10082. These comments are generated early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting on December 8, 2005. Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that maybe generated at the DRC meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting. If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582. Sincerely, Jo Schodtler Planner I Cc: File 1\ [' ~ • 1.25 pm Case Number: FLS2005-100 440 EAST SHORE DR Owner(s): East Shore Land Development 401.2 Florida Ave Tampa, Fl 33604 TELEPHONE: 727-5 3 5 -2004, Applicant East Shore Land Development 4012 Florida Ave FAX: 727-536-6728,. E-MAIL: No Email Tampa, Fl 33604 TELEPHONE: 727-535-2004, FAX: 727-536-6728, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Steven R Bouffard 1538 Chateau Deville Court Clearwater, Fl 33764 TELEPHONE: 727-535-2004, FAX: 727-536-6728, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 0.133 acres located at the northwest corner of East Shore Drive and Papaya Street. Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to permit renovations to an existing overnight accomodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood 440 West, Inc. Condominium Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 440 S Gulfview Blvd #203 TELEPHONE: 461-2885, FAX: 442-6628, E-MAIL: et440@juno.com Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. In accordance with Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-1401.B., existing parking lots shall be brought into full compliance if an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25 percent or more of the valuation of the existing principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records. If this condition is satisfied, all requirements of CDC Section 3-1402. must be met. The above shall be addressed prior to DO. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional. comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1) No Issues. Fire: This review is not a review for building permit. Additional items will be required during that process. A monitored fire alarm system shall be installed and sound levels must achieve 75db at pillow level.. Acknowledge PRTOR TO DO Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Development Review Agenda -Thursday, December 8, 2005 -Page 29 Land Resources: 1 _ No Issues. • Landscaping: ] . Staff suggests the removal of the existing ficus trees and replacing them with cedars or palms. Parks and Recreation: No issues -interior renovations to existing 10 units. Stormwater: ] . No Issues. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Provide required number of disabled parking spaces compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.1.2. 2. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Sectiom ] 00, Index No. 118) 3. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 1 ], Section 11-4.3.2. 4. Accessible route must be designed such that users are not compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section ] 1-4.6.2. 5. Provide a parking table including required parking and number of spaces provided. 6. Show dimensions of drive aisles and parking stalls. All of the above to be addressed prior to a D.O.. General note: Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) of $8,500.00 to be paid prior to a C.O.. Notes: Hotel rate $1,760 per room : 10 rooms x $1,760 = $17,600.00 TIF Motel rate $910 per room: 10 rooms x $910 = $9,100.00 Credit $17,600.00 - $9,100.00 = $8,500.00 Planning: 1 . Revise building elevations to include the building height, dimensioned. (Provide one set) 2 . Acknowledge in writing the following: 1. That the use of this property will continue to be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 consecutive days. 2. That a license will be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. 3. That a registration lobby shall be maintained. 4. That this development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual. dwelling units, nor shall individual units qualify for homestead exemption tax credits. 3 . Provide existing and proposed Impervious Surface Ratios (ISR) for the property. 4 . Existing developed lots not meeting the requirements contained in the parking, landscaping, and signage sections of the Code shall be brought into full compliance if the existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25 percent or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records. The data submitted indicates the 25 percent threshold has been exceeded. An option would be to reduce the scope of work of this project to below the 25 percent threshold and then come in after 12 months to request the remainder of the improvements as a second project. Other: $1 . Clarify, how Beach By Design, design criteria #7 has been met. (To ensure that the street level of all buildings is pedestrian friendly.) $2 . That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the DRC; $3 . Revise the possible color of the dwelling unit doors (big country blue) to something less intense. See the Beach By Design color palette (p. 67) for more muted suggestions. $4 . Clarify, how Beach By Design, design criteria #1 has been met. (To ensure that the proposed design is aesthetically pleasing architecture in a tropical vernacular.) $5 . Clarify, how Beach By Design, design criteria #2 has been met. (To create inviting, human scale "places" at the street level of all buildings.) Development Review Agenda -Thursday, December 8, 2005 -Page 30 r Dec. 05 2005 02:09PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 ND. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USRGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95366728 Dec. 05 02:08PM 01'16 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. TI-E~1 SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR ' -' - FOR FAX ADIN~NTAC~ ASSISTANCE, PLF~SE CALL 1-800--1-~P-FAX C435-73291. ~~ S a..a-ate- / ~ g a. WEST FINANCIAL CORP FORLINI, DOMENIC AFD 808 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ~~d :~ RE, C JOHN PULLARA, JOSEPH A 1324 427 LOCH DEVON DR LUTZ FL 33548 - 4282 CLEARWATER BH BK INVESTORS SAPOURN, PETER J TRUST ATTN: MAIL FL-ORL-2032 2285 ISRATELI DR # 61 PO BOX 2829 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 3007 ORLANDO FL 32802 - 2829 FORLINI, DOMENIC & FULVIA 808 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1324 VOLTSIS, PANDELIS A &NIKI 427 POINSETTIA AVE CLEAR:~VATER FL 33767 - 2025 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 EAST SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 PIMENIDIS, JOHN H PIMENIDIS, CHRISTINA 1651 SAND KEY ESTATES CT # 11 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2933 CARACO, JOSEPH LINARES, ANTHONY 800 S KEENE RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4630 WATERFRONT BAYSIDE ESTATES II 1833 KEENE RD N CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2314 WATERFRONT BAYSIDE ESTATES PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE LLC 419 EAST SHORE DR 1833 KEENE RD N CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2314 GELEP, HELENA EST HEILMAN FAMILY LTD PTNSHP 2020 BAYSHORE DR 941 BAY ESPLANADE BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3425 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1002 J E C FUNDING INC PO BOX 4689 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4689 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CARACO, JOSEPH IOCOLANO, FRANCO 800 S KEENE RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4630 SCHUTZENDORF, GILBERT H THE SCHUTZENDORF, ALICE M THE 19029 US HIGHWAY 19 N # B8 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3015 T J CLEARWATER CORP 1100 LNE OAK CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4539 FINANCIAL WAREHOUSE GROUP 4595 TOWNE LAKE PKWY STE 130 WOODSTOCK GA 30189 - 5514 HEILMANS RESTAURANTS INC 447 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2013 DAY, WILLIAM A THE 1968 LAKEVIEW AVE DRACUT MA 01826 - 3210 STEPHANS, SUSAN GIANNAS, SPIRO P URINO, FRANK N & NATALIE STEPHANS, DORIS GIANNAS, STATHIA P TRUST 803 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 25745 SANTOS WAY 1627 MIDNIGHT PASS WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3004 WESLEY CHAPEL FL 33544 - 5513 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1821 • POTTER, PASCHOALENA HARTMAN,fDOLORES M THE DELETIOGLU, ISMET 463 EAST SHORE DR UTA 3-30-82 2581 1/2 N CLARK ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2033 1850 SAN MATEO DR CHICAGO IL 60614 - 1717 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3719 FORLINI, PAUL PIMENIDIS, JOHN H DAY, WILLIAM A LIVING TRUST SHANNON FORLINI PIMENIDIS, CHRISTINA DAY, WILLIAM A THE , 440 EAST SHORE DR 473 EAST SHORE DR 446 EAST SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2031 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2033 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2031 POTTER, PASCHOALINA C LOUIS DEVELOPMENTS LLC - PO BOX 2535 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 SALISBURY MD 21802 - 2535 Clearwater November 08, 2005 Steven R Bouffard 1538 Chateau Devine Court Clearwater, Fl 33764 CITY O~F CLEA~RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM RE: FL52005-10082 -- 440 EAST SHORE DR -- Letter of Completeness Dear Steven R Bouffard The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-10082. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is comulete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on December 08, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater. com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner I Letter ofCompleteness - FGS2005-10082 - 440 EAST SHORE DR r ~ Nov. 08 2005 02:22PM YOUR LOGO City0~Clearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 N0. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95366728 No~.08 02:21PM 00'39 SND 01 OK TO TARN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE RSSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). ,~ Clearwater November 07, 2005 Steven R Bouffard 1538 Chateau Devine Court Clearwater, Fl 33764 CITY `~Ft CLE RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM RE: FLS2005-10082 -- 440 EAST SHORE DR -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Steven R Bouffard The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-10082. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. From the proposed cost estimate provided it appears that this redevelopment will exceed 50 percent of the value of the building based on the values collected by the Pinellas County Property Appraisor's records. 1) Exceeding 25 percent requires that all parking, landscaping, and signage be brought into compliance with current code. This will require a level two, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application to be filed, since the required off-street parking will not be met. 2) Exceeding 50 percent will require a termination of non-conforming overnight accomodation units (10 units, where five are allowed). Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Thursday, November 10, 2005 (12:00 Noon). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ( ~f2~tl,+~. Jo Schodtler Planner I Letter oflracompleter:ess - FLS2005-10082 - 440 EAST SNORE DR ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ " Nov. 07 2005 09:42AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX N0. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95366728 Nov. 07 09:42AM 00'41 5ND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADIJANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL i-~-HELP=-FAX C435-7329). Pinellas County Property Appr~~r Information:; 08 29 15 16434 002 01~ Page 2 of 5 ,- . 08 / 29 / 15 I X044 1 002 / 0150 22-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:26:42 Ownership Information Hon-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales L K FAMILY TRUST OBK: 14635 OPG: 2374 EAST SHORE LAHD DEUELOPMEHT LLC C}0 DIRECTOR, SUSAN THE PO BOX 93580 LAKELAND FL 33804 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Rddr: 440 EAS T SHORE DR of Jan 1, 2045, based on Census Tract: 260.02 4 : sales from 2003 - 200 0 Sale Date OR Book{Page Price (QuallUnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 9 12,005 14,635}2,374 1,360,000 {Q} I 1937: Book 021 Pgs 021- 1011,986 6,331{ 666 220,000 4Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 1211,984 5,898/1,587 150,000 {M} I 0000: Baak Pgs - 0 /0 0} 0 0 { } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS JustlMarket: 400,000 Homestead: NO Ownership ~ .000 Govt Exem: HO Use ~: .000 Assessed/Cap: 400,000 Institutional Exem: HO Tax Exempt ~: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 400,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Bay Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 9,294.8$ 1} 50 x 115 32.00 5, 785. 00 S Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 9, 294.88 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 9, 294.88 Short Legal CLEARWATER BEACH PARK 1ST ADD R EPEAT Description BLK B, LOT 15 L Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11 /22/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr~r Information: 08 29 15 16434 002 0~ Page 3 of 5 Property_and Land Use Code descriptions 08 ~ 29 ~ 15 / 1034 / 002 / 0150 :01 22-Nov-2005 Jim Smith, CFR Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:26:43 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel < 4 St Property Address: 440 EAST SHORE DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1cm~nts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior LJall Conc B1ocklStucco Height Factor 0 Party LJall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built UplComposition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Rir Heating&Cooling Splt Fixtures 30 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,950 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Area s Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1} Base Area i. 00 2, 854 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch . 30 i, 316 8} . 00 0 3) Upper Stry Base Area .90 2,444 9) .00 0 4} .00 0 10} .00 0 5} .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12} .00 0 C omm er c i al E x t r a F~ at ur ~ s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} ASPHALT 2200 1.50 2,200 3,300 3,300 999 2} .00 0 0 0 0 3} .00 0 0 0 0 4} .00 0 0 0 0 5} .00 0 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 3,300 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11/22/2005 Page 4 of 5 J ~ YI 1/S Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11/22/2005 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 08 29 15 16434 002 015.0 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 08 29 15 16434 002 0150 Page 5 of 5 '~ ,. Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 11/22/2005 DRC Meeting Date: December 8, 2005 Case Number: FLS2005-10082 Applicant/Owner: East Shore Land Development Representative: Steven Robert Bouffard Address: 440 East Shore Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Standard Development approval to permit renovations to an existing overnight accommodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: Tourist District (T), Residential Facility High, RFH PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight Accommodations Proposed Use: Overnight Accommodations (Condo-tel) ADJACENT/ZONING LAND USES: North: Detached Dwelling West: Restaurant East: Detached Dwellings South: Retail Sales & Service CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate area is characterized bytourist-oriented businesses, such as; retail establishment, hotels/motels, and restaurants. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.133-acre (5,787 square foot) site is located at the northwest corner of East Shore Drive and Papaya Street. It is located within atourist-oriented area. The site contains an existing 5,298 square foot, ten-unit overnight accommodation use. The site is a triple fronted lot fronting on Poinsettia Street, Papaya Street, and East Shore Drive and is almost entirely impervious. The site is zoned Tourist District and is located in the Tourist, Marina Residential District per Beach by Design. Proposal: The proposal includes an exterior facade remodel and a complete interior remodel of the existing two-story ten-unit overnight accommodation establishment. The use will remain overnight accommodation however the ownership is proposed to change to condo-tel. Five overnight accommodation units per floor exist with approximately 357 square feet of living area each on the two floors, for a total of approximately 5,300 square feet of living area. A total of 10 parking spaces exist, primarily located in the Papaya Street right of way. The plans do not indicate the required handicapped parking space. The existing second floor roof deck located over the S.•IPlnnning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Stnndarrl (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslEast Shore 440 East Shore Land Development (T) -12.8.05 DRC - jvsIFLS2005-10082 Staff Report.doc office will be repaired and replaced. The landscaping proposed exceeds minimum code requirements without removing existing concrete or structure. The proposed redevelopment of the building has been determined to be within acceptable constraints of the Code by the Development Review Manager. The proposed development will have minimal impact on existing trees and vegetation on the subject property as the lot is almost entirely developed. Surrounding properties include similarly developed tourist oriented businesses as this application. The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development will result in a development in keeping with the existing character of the neighborhood. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Flexible Standard Development criteria (Section 2-803.B), and Beach By Design have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-803.B.): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM DENSITY Ten overnight accommodation units X* (40 overnight accommodation units per acre) (Nine dwellings maximum) IMPERVIOUS 0.47 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (0.95) LOT AREA (15,000 sq. 0.133 acres; 5,787 square feet X* feet LOT WIDTH (100-150 South: 115 feet ~ X feet) East & West: 50 feet FRONT SETBACK South: 11 feet (to building) and zero X* (10-15 feet) feet (to pavement) West: zero feet (to building) East: 6.9 feet (to buildin ) SIDE SETBACK North: five feet (to building) and X* (0 - 10 feet) two feet (to pavement) HEIGHT (35 - 50 feet 17.0 feet (to roof deck) X maximum) PARKING SPACES 10 spaces X* (1.0 spaces per unit) (10 s aces minimum * See discussion under Analysis. S: IPlnnning DepnrUnentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Vnnctive or Finished CnseslEnst Shore 440 Enst Shore Land Development (T) -12.8.05 DRC - jvsIFLS2005-/0082 Staff Report.doc • f'f1MPT.TAN( F. WTTN (:FNF,RAT, 4TANnARnS (Section 3-9131: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X covera e, densit and character of adjacent ro erties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly im air the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Develo ment is designed to minimize traffic con estion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent ro erties. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.133 acres is located within the Marina Residential District of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is for ten overnight accommodation units; 3. The proposal includes a complete remodel of the existing buildings and no change of use; 4. The proposal includes a change of ownership from sole proprietorship to condo-tel; 5. The subject property is zoned Tourist District and is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Marina Residential District" District; 6. The site is adjacent to a detached dwelling area to the north zoned Low Medium Density Residential, which is not part of Beach. by Design, and restricts dwellings to a maximum height of 30 feet; 7. The proposal includes landscaping the remaining open spaces available on the site. 8. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as an overnight accommodation use, per Section 2-803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Beach By Design standards in the Code. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. Based on the analysis of this proposal and the above findings, Staff recommends approval of this application. S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standm•d (FLS)I/nactive or Finished CaseslEast Shore 440 East Shore Land Development (T) -/2.8.OSDRC-jvsIFLS2005-10082 StaffReport.doc ~ ~ SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials date stamped received on October 17, 2005 and revised on March 7, 2006. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Standard approval to permit renovations to an existing overnight accommodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B.at 440 East Shore Drive, with the following bases and conditions. Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as an overnight accommodation use, per Section 2-803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Beach By Design standards in the Code. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of approval: 1. That the use of this property will continue to be for overnight accommodations, meeting the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 consecutive days. At the request of the City Manager or designee, the records of the business shall be made available for examination to determine whether the length of stay complies with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines, revocation of the occupational license and/or any other enforcement afforded by law or by City regulations. A license must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby shall be maintained. This development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall individual units qualify for homestead exemption tax credits; 2. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the DRC; and 4. That all signage be consistent to the design colors submitted and comply with the requirements of the signage portion of the Community Development Code and Beach By Design. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: John Schodtler, Planner I S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)IL~active or Finished CaseslEast Shore 440 East Shore Land Development (T) -11.8.05 DRC - j vs I FLS1005-/ 0081 Staff Report. doc ,, ,, ' .. . .. ~ _. a ~.. ~. . . •r~•+ r ~'''~''~;y~ CITY O F C L, E A R W A T E R ~ ~ ~~~ .. *,~ ,. ;~"Q; PLANNING DEPARTMENT , -~9~;:-~°E~g' Posr O~cE Box 4748 '~` ~' D - •„g7EF,, x ~ PBHET6A U. 3. POSTAtiE~ *: 'CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3375$'4748 1~-'~• ._ FINANCfAL WAREHOUSE GROUP 4595 TOWNC LAKL PKWY S"C1~ 130 WOODSTOCK GA 30189 - 5514 ' - - -= - NS,?{2~ ~C?D Gp i C}C} 11126(}5 F?ETURId TD vF-dCfteR ~~UNA®L~~'Y~~FQ~WARC>~ i ' ®C : ~37~~4'7~4~s17 :r :L r9i - C]$~952-.°~' B-.2~3 ~:;:;:~~-~,t:-~r~b+~.~~,~ 1..11~~~It~~~~~i~l~i~i~~l~~l~,li~~~1~13~fi,~1~~i~~li~~i~i~i~~1 i _ - t~ , , l~ 1, ~' .1 LL CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ ~~1 11~,t~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORII}A 33756 TELEPHONE: (727} 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W WW.MYCLEARWATER. COM November 21, 2005 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 440 EAST SHORE DR (FLS2005-10082) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 204 feet of 440 EAST SHORE DR, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to pemut renovations to an existing overnight accomodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2-$03.B.. On December 08, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and deternune whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be December 08, 2005. ~ ,. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-562-4547 ° or John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files andlor submit `. ~ ' written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant • may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business - hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. M, . An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on December 08, 2005. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. • Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our ~. Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater,com. Sincerely yours; `~~ ,_ _-- r ~, /~' y~ r--- 4 ' John Schodtler ~ ~ ' ~ .~~' ~ _r--- ~" _ .- PlannerI~ ~ ~~ ,~,.-.. 't; ~~~ 3 ~ 2~q~ . t"~a _ ~..~ ~._--- r I;iEVPLOPMENT PIANNIia SERVIG~S j r ATER 1 Gl"'' ~~' ~;a._=A~W --~-` ~ _._~.1---._ Letter of NoHfcation - FL52D05-10082 - 440 EAST SHORE DR ~. , ,~ ' . ''''~` `qr~: CITY O F C L E A R W A T E R __ ~- - -_ , v, ~ M ~~~`'~~'"'"` '= ~~ ~~ ~ ~ _ f ~~ PLANNING DErAR'1'hIENT ~ -~ ~,+ ~ ~~ Q. .p9~„w...4ga Poll' OFFICE Box 4748 `~ ~ _ . _ _ r ... •• ~ •~ ~ .° ~` .:: CLEARWATER, F'`LORIDA 3758-4748 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~P~~METS~ '" 7~264]~. V.S. PO TARE ~ :..POTTER, SCIIOALENA ~ • 463 EAS HOIZE DR - CI~.EA ATER FL 33767 - 2033 r ~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER o ~ . > ~~,~,~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727} 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM November 21, 2005 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 440 EAST SHORE DR (FLS2005-10082) To Surrounding Property Owners: Rs a property owner within 200 feet of 440 EAST SHORE DR, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to permit renovations to an existing overnight accomodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Seetion 2-803,B.. On December 0$, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff} will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and deternuniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be December 08, 2005. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-562-4547 or John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the filesand/or subnvt ' . ' written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant . may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business - hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. ,.~ An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director maybe initiated by the applicant or property owners within j the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting an December 08, 2005. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee; with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. • ~ Thank you for your interestin the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our ~. Planning Department through the City's website: www,myclearwater.cam. ~'"" -~';=~~ /.' ~~' Sincerely yoars; ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ `'~ ~ 1~, ~ ~ 4 ~~ ', John Schodtler `~~' ~, ~~ ~, ~ ~~~ 3 a' ~~ Planner 1 - `t ~~ , ~ _ ~ N~ . , , Q~NN SF GvI~PwA~~a ~~ C~,~ 0 Letter of NotiTcation - FLS2005-10082 - 440 EAST SHORE DR .~ ' . . ;;~''==ar~,~ CITY OF CLEARWATER `*.q. `~ `'`' ~a v, ~ ~~ :lQ: P[.ANN~NG DEPAR734IENT '~ '~ ~ .+~ w~ w ~:;~ 'g9~~~E~~q~~ Posr Or~-c~ Box 4748 ~ " SOY 22'0 5 ~ ~ ° ~: ~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA X3758-4745 ~ ~ d '' ~ • ~~ ~4fI. U.S. D() TACiE 1°~1 v `~ CLEARWATER CITY OI' ~ ~ i ~ ~- FO BOX 4748 - °__. ..---. -_2 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 . • ~'~~~,i~JN~IJ ~ ~ DEVELOPMENT ' ' SERVICES L r%` ~'.EARWATER .. p: .. ~, i a ',t-~~-~ 4••~t~•; ~ M:°` ._,°.'. ~ .~.44~,SIC,1'„~1~1,1~1,~{„I`,.tl,,,I~tat{I,~i~,i`„{t;,i~~1~t~~t .~ a ~~ LL CITY OF CLEARWATER > L~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT rWat~r MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 j WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM ~ November 21, 2005 i ,~ RE. NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 440 EAST SHORE DR {FLS2005-1.0082) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 440 EAST SHORE DR, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to permit renovations to an existing overnight accomodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B.. On December 08, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will . ~ review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a ~- m ` ~i Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that ' ~ the City will make a decision on the application will be December 08, 2005. ~ i The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-Sb2-4547 • or John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit ' . ' ~ I written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business . - hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. . I An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within I, the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review ~ ~ Committee meeting on December 08, 2.005. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the ', Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our. - , •, Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. ; ,~~-^ ~ ~~ • ~' ` ' ~ . n J ' Sincerely yours, `~1 . ,..-t ~ ~ ~. . ~~_ 1 ~oa5 ,' John Schodtler ;' ~~~ ~ 3 ~ . ' ~+, _ _ ~ N.t PlannerI ~ dpM~ 4 x P~ r & ©~vE~ NN1N SERViG~s TAR ~F f; ~ARWp, ,,~ ~_- Letter ofNotification - PL52005-10082 - 440 EAST SHORE DR i f ~~ ~~ ~n~ . CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ ~~ ~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT rat MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM November 21, 2005 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 440 EAST SHORE DR (FLS20D5-10082) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 440 EAST SHORE DR, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to permit renovations to an existing overnight accomodations use in the Tourist, Marina Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2-803,B.. s~~~ On December 08, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that. the City will make a decision on the application will be December 08, 2005. ' ' , The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-562-4547 or John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended, An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director maybe initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review " Committee meeting on December 08, 2005 . An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the - Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, r~~,e~~ John Schodtler i Planner I Letter o fNotification - FLS200S-I008~ - 440 EAST SHORE DR COLOR & MATERIAL SCHE'''~LE -COOL BREEZE `~_- BENJAMIN MOORE:V~NILLA ICE CREAM 2154-70 _ _. __ ~ ( ) i 1. COLUMNS I 2.WALLS ~~~~~ 3.ALL FIELD ELEMENTS ~'F- . ~° ~~ - ~I BENJAMIN MOORS: SUNTAN YELLOW (2155-50) 1.1 FOAM PANEL BETWEEN COUMNS 2.WINDOW SILL R r~'~- ,`~e l_ -_- -----' BENJAMIN MOORS; BIG COUNTRY BLUE (2066-30) BENJAMIN MOORS: BRILLIANTWHITE r--- -- 1.STEEL STAIRS, RAILING & BALUSTRADE r 5 r~ b' ~~~ ~ 1 LVVV P!~-NN91~~ DEI'AR~MENr CITY QF C~F~4W'ATER K li B M l t ®R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~pan~ - ree o o e ti's ~ ''~ /~ ~J ' P V ~ ~ D ar«rxaew. inc. / Code Landscape i.l U L~ ~J V land~aPe acnienue • carn„n„ iry oeagn ~~~~•~~•al~~~a,~~ Color Elevations "333".~m~. iH:,9,3,97~~aae ianpo. Fl 33617 Fox: (8139)25888 Not to Scale Q~T ~ ZQQS } Front Elevation ., . ti r Left Elevation y ' n - ~ ~ x . ~ - `SY i Right Elevation Z 0 0 Z ~tt~T ~~'9~T~o r-~ ORIGINAL R~~'fl~~n ~~~ ~ 2~~~ Rn '"~.Rlt~~c . r p~Nt~l. Cif O~ C;Lr_ii~cv:h`6~L. U z . ~. ~ w ~~ O O O O O p W5 W II Q '~" ~ SECOND LEA _ ~V ~ ~ 7657 AUGUSTA DRIVE 5. ~' 7F~ CLEARwA1ER. Ft. 33761 y _ ~ ~ U•U• I.l7J 1BB 9/90 F. 7776695575 ~~ r~ ~ / \ MAIN LEVEL V REFERENCE r ~ ~- O ~ O WSJ SOUTH ELEVATION ~ g v E~~ ~ a ~~~~~ °~°~, '~°- ~p ~h~~ t ~ j:~ pi ~i SECOND LEVEL ~ Q p~.U• W Q MAIN LEVEL ~~ REFERENCE J W I QU q OQ 1 ~1 NORTH ELEVATION UJm ~ -~' QW ~¢ W U~ aQ ~ m ~~ U ® ® I I den- I ~ ® ® ~ ,-- 0411 ~1 EAST ELEVATION ~1 WEST ELEVATION ELEVATIONS ma'mr SEP_29_2005 ELEV ~~ ~~~ ~- FED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. O.M.B. No. 3067-0077 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM ()(; ( 1 7 ~QQFj Expires December 31, 2005 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE '~ F~ ~~ ~~~~~~ Il~'~~IRTr1UlE(VT Important: Read the instructions on pages 1 - 7. , ~~ (~~"~ ` ' SECTION A -PROPERTY OWNER - - - - - ----- ~Pollc~_Numb$:r~_~___:~ ~ :_:_=_=- -_ ~ S SNo~..~ J~E~EI.-0 ANT 1.-LG BUILD( G STREET ADDRESS (~cludin Apt.,. Unit, Suite, andlor Bidg. NoJ OR P.O. ROUTE AND BOX NO. l;otn an NAi Number p Y ~ - a ~~ ,~.~ ~~ DR 1~1E~ _: CITY STATE ZIP CODE ~~(L-1r~~'sT~-(~- ~~-~.t-{ ~l~ ~ 337 7 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Lot and Biock Numbers, Tax Parcel Number, Le al Description, etc.) LoT I5 . ~ to ~ ~ , c ~.~2i~~rw~.~ ~~GM ~P~-~~ g.~r !~ Q~ 1Tj t, -~ K~~'~F1T BUILDING USE ( g., Residential, Non-rest ential, Addition,.Accessory, etc.. Use a Comments area, If necessary.) COM M Et2.G1/-~ i.-~ ~ NIUT~,I,,... LATITUDE/LONGITUDE (OPTIONAL) HORIZONTAL DATUM: ( ##° - ##' - ##.##" or i!#.###t!#°) I-) NAD 1927 I-I NAB 1983 SOURCE: I-I GPS (Type): - _-----_---- I_i USES Quad Map I_i Other _ _-~-_ SECTION B -FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) INFORMATION B1. NFIP COMMUNITY NAME & COMMUNITY NUMBER B2. COUNTY NAME B3. STATE B4. MAP AND PANEL 65. SU FIX BB. FIRM INDEX B7. FIRM PANEL 68. FLOOD 89. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION(S) NUMBER 12103 G 010.. ~," DATE 9.®a,..~, ~ EFFECTIVE/REVISED DATE g-°3-~3 ZONES} AE (Zone AO, use depth of flooding) ~ . 1,1 o iv. inoicare me source or me rsase rlooa Elevation (BFE) data or base flood depth entered in B9. ~__~ FIS Profile FIRM I__I Community Determined I__I Other (Describe): ______,___________-__-___ 811. Indicate the elevation datum used for the BFE in B9: 1__1 NGVD 1929 ~I NAVD 1988 I__I Other (Describe): _-____~_~____ 812, Is the building located in a Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) area or Otherwise Protected Area (OPA)7 I-I Yes I~(,I No Designation Date:__.________________ SECTION C -BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY REQUIRED) C1. Building elevations are based on: I__IConstruction Drawings` I__IBuilding UndAr Construction* (Finished Construction "A new Elevation Certificate will be required when construction of the building is complete. C2. Building Diagram Number f~_~_._ (Select the building diagram most similar to the building for which this certificate is being completed -see pages 6 and 7. if no diagram accurately represents the building, provide a sketch or photograph.) C3. Elevations -Zones Al-A30, AE, AH, A (with BFE), VE, V1-V30, V (with BFE), AR, AR/A, AR/AE, AR/A1-A30, AR/AH, AR/AO Complete Items C3.a-i below according to the building diagram specified in Item C2. State the datum used. If the datum is different from . the datum used for the BFE in Section B, convert the datum to that used for the BFE. Show field measurements and datum conversion calculatipn. Use the space provided or the Comments area of Section D or Section G, as appropriate, to document the dafurh`:~onversion. Datum _Ff1/p 1~~~ Conversion/Comments _______~~~_ )`~E~/~ 1~ T~ nl/~Vp = ~B® ~ ; ~ ___ .Elevation reference mark used_~IT~~ C~l~~_~-Z .Does the elevation reference mark used appear n~ the FIRMfi` b(a ~ 4Y~s'"° I I No ^ a) Top of bottom floor (including basement or enclosure) ___~___~ , ~~ ft.(m) ~ ,, , :- - ~,~ f;,:,,,,~° ~, ,~, t ,,,,~, • ^ b To of next hi her floor _ _ ~ ~' ~ ' • ~ "' ° ° ". ~ ' ^ c) Bottom of lowest horizontal structural member (V zones only) __ N/~`__ . __ ft.(m) +~L .,S '' ~7` ~~ ^ d) Attached garage (top of slab) ___/d_/A ___ ___ ft.(m} , ~~' `~~,.~~ - ~r ,~ "P `; ^ e) Lowest elevation of rriachinery,and/or equipment ~,.:,; ~.4.~ - ~~ a ~_. servicing the building (Describe in a Comments area.) _ __ ~ 5 . ~ ft.(m) :~ ~ o-k ° °~'~ x, `j Z 'xc~,r~- , °:~ " "• ^ f) Lowest adjacent (finished) grade (LAG) ___ ___~ , ~ ft.(m) ~' z' ~', 3~' , °..~..'b~• ~ ' '~ ~~ ~~ ; ~.: ' ^ g) Highest adjacent (finished) grade (HAG) _______~ . ~_ ft.(m) ~ .4, ~ ~~ ~' c~~`'~ ~ die r.. ^ h} No. of permanent openings (flood vents) within 1 ft. above adjacent grade _ -t~_ ~` + ~ ~ ~•,,~~`q ~'t ~, • ~~;:` ^ i) Total area of all permanent openings (flood vents) in C3.h _ -6~ sq. in. (sq. cm) ,~:;,,;,. ~t;~ . - _ ,,., ~'; SECTION D -SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, OR ARCNI7ECT CERTIFICATION': 'A,e~:: ,:'~ - ' This certification is to be signed and sealed by a land surveyor, engineer, or architect authorized by law to certify elevation information. - I certify that the information in Sections A, 8, and C on this certificate represents my best efforts fo interpret the data available. ; -' l understand that any false statement maybe punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S. Code, Section 1001. .~ CERTIFIER'S NAME LICENSE NUMBER Larry L. Evans L.S. 11 2937 TITLE surveyor COMPANY NAME Evans Land Surveying, Inc. ADDRESS 1460 Beltrees Street,. Ste. 9 Cln' Dunedin, STATE R ZIP CODE 34698 ~,~,.,.,,~,.G ~ ~/,(.c~.i(-- ~r l~ ~/J ~.,,~ 9,Zg_D5 ,~~~.,,.,,.~ (727) 734-3821 FEMA Form 81-31, 9anu~r~ 2003 See reverse side for continuation. Replaces all previous editions IMPORTANT: In these spaces, copy the~rresponding information from Section A. Far ingurance Com any Use :: BUILDING STREET ADDRESS (Including Apt., Unit, Suite, and/or Bldg. No.) OR P.O. ROUTE AND BOX NO. Policy. Number STATE ZIP CODE Company NAIL Number ciTY Gt/~i4 ta=vJ~,-jr'~~- .~3~i4~-N L ~ 337 _ _ _. .._ F SECTION D -SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, OR ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION (CONTINUED) {.. ~ Copy both 94d'es of this Elevation Certificate for (1) community official, (2) insurance agent/company, and (3) building owner. COMMENTS` ? ~~ ` ~'~ ~h d ~Gao(~... ~1.~-~~ ~/ca.n.l = /4--,Ica __ ~ ~ I i Check here If attachments SECTION E -BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY NOT REQUIRED) FOR ZONE AO AND ZONE A (WITHOUT BFE). For Zone AO and Zone A (without BFE), complete Items E1. through E5. If the Elevation Certificate is intended for use as supporting information for a LOMA or LOMR-F, Section C must be completed: E1. Building .Diagram Number ____ (Select the building diagram most similar to the building for which this certificate is being completed see pages 6 and 7. If no diagram accurately represents the building, provide a sketch or photograph.) E2. The top of the bottom floor (including basement or enclosure) of the building is I__I_I ft. (mj I__I__I in. (cm) I__I above or I-I below (check one) the highest adjacent grade. (Use natural grade, if available.) E3. For Building Diagrams 6-8 with openings (see page 7); the next higher floor or elevated floor (elevation b) of the building is I--I--I f#. (m) I__I__Iin. (cm) above the highest adjacent grade. Complete Items C3.h and C3.i on front of form. E~4. The top of the platform of machinery and/or equipment servicing the building is I__I__I ft. (m) I--I--I in. (cm) I__I above or I__I below (check one) the highest adjacent grade. (Use natural grade, if available.) E5. For Zone AO only: If no flood depth number is available, is the top of the bottom floor elevated in accordance with the community's flood lain management ordinance? I I Yes I__I No I__I Unknown. The local official must certify this information in Section G. n-~~ Imo- qr~~ SECTION F -PROPERTY OWNER (OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE) CERTIFICATION The property owner or owner's authorized representative who completes Sections A, B, C (Items C3.h and C3.i only), and E far Zone A (without aFEMA-issued orcommunity-issued BFE) or Zone AO must sign here. The statements in Sections A, 8, C, and F are correct to the best of my knowledge. PROPERTY OWNER'S OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE'S NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE SIGNATURE DATE TELEPHONE COMMENTS INFORMATION here If The local official who is authorized by law or ordinance to administer the community's floodplain management ordinance can complete Sections A, B, C (or E),,arid G of this Elevation. Certificate. Complete the applicable item(s) and sign below. G1. I__I The information in Sr~ction C was taken from other documentation that has bean signed and embossed by a licensed surveyor, engineer, or architect who is authorized by state or local law to certify elevation information, (Indicate the source and date of the elevation data in the Comments area below.) G2. I__I A community offi.^.ial completed Section E for a building located in Zone A (without aFEMA-issued orcommunity-issued BFE) or Zone AO. G3. I__I The following information (teems U4-Gg) is provided for community floodplain management purposes. ~. PERMIT NUMBER G5. .DATE PERMIT ISSUED ~ G6. DATE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCElOCCUPANCY ISSUED G7. This permit,has bean issued for: ~__I New Construction I__I Substantial Improvement G8. Elevation of as-built lowest floor (including basement) of the building is: ___._____ _. ft. (m) Datum: G9. BFE or (in Zone AO) depth of flooding at the building site is: _~_____ ~_ ft. (m) Datum: LOCAL OFFICIAL'S NAME TITLE COMMUNITY NAME TELEPHONE SIGNATURE COMMENTS ~~i . .. ~~ , ~. ~; I-I Check here if attachments FEMA Form 81-31, January 2003 Replaces all previous editions l _. ... 5 j r '`~y d~~. ~ ~ r ~`T ~~ 1. ~ \ j \~~ ~,~ i . ~\ Ai ~ e . ~y t ,11 }S tt ~ ~\ :' , .~~~,~ ~ ~ i i +I I~ i ;~ I j~ ~I~_ .. !~ ORi6i~~;~,. ORIGINAL LIMITED SUMMARY APPRAISAL REPORT Koli-Bree Motel A 10 Unit Motel Property 440 East Shore Drive Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 Marr File Number 08051345 PREPARED FOR Mr. Frank Hughes 106 Phillips Way Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 EFFECTIVE DATE September 6, 2005 ~~~~9~~~ ocT ~ ~ ZaaS BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tod Marr, MAI, ccIM CITY 01= CLEARWATER State-certified general appraiser RZ1237 Brian D. DeMuth State-certified general appraiser RZ2473 TOD MARR & ASSOCIATES 1.8860 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTH, SUITE 116 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33764 ORIGINAL ~~~~9~~~ oc~ ~ ~ zoa~ PIANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i~ 1 Tod Marr and Associates ORIGINAL 18860 U.S. Highway 19 North, Suite 116 Real Estate Appraisers Clearwater, Florida 33764 (main office) and Consultants Telephone (727) 524-9118 Tod Marr, MAI, CCIM Fax (727) 524-8902 St. Cert. U~nr..lzE. • ~~37 ~~ ~~~~ September 16, 2005 OCT 1 '7 2005 Mr. Frank Hughes 106 Phillips Way Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Re: A limited summary appraisal report of a ten unit motel property referred to as Koli- Bree Motel, Clearwater Beach, Pinellas County, Florida. Marr File #08051345. Dear Mr. Hughes: At your request, we have prepared an appraisal of the above referenced property. The ' purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the market value of the fee simple interest of the above referenced property, as of the effective date of appraisal, September 6, 2005. This ~ appraisal estimates the market value of the subject in "as is" condition. The following report contains a summary of the data, analysis, assumptions and limiting conditions on which we have based our value conclusions. Your attention is directed to the general assumptions and limiting conditions and certificate of appraisal that is considered typical for this type of assignment and have been included within the text of this report. This report has been prepared in compliance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). Further, we have complied with the competency requirement of USPAP. Based on the available market data and the following analysis, the market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property in "as is" condition, as of September 6, 2005, is estimated at O E MILLION THREE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ' ($1,350,000) e pect 11 Submitted, 1 ~ -- - ~~ Tod Marr, MAI, CCIM Brian D. DeMuth ' St.-Cert. Gen. REA RZ1237 St.-Cert. Gen. REA RZ2473 (Exterior Inspection Only) CRIGiNAL SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS 9~~~ ~ 2005 VIEW OF SUBJECT PROPERTY FACING NORTHEASTP~ANIVING DEPARTMENT FROM POINSETTIA STREET CITY ~~ ~~Fr'aRWATER ii VIEW OF PROPERTY FACING NORTHWEST FROM EAST SHORE DRIVE ORiGIfJiaL W W o ° ~ a c ~ ~.. ~ W ~ ...1 b--- O Q ~ ~ } ~ F gU ui REAR VIEW OF STRUCUTRE FACING WEST INTERIOR OF TXPICAL UNIT ORIGINAL ~ ~ W ~ _ o ~ ~~ Q~ ~J n n ^ ~ u 1 ,__., W p ( ~ U v :~ ~O ~ ~ ~U iv INTERIOR VIEW OF TYPICAL UNIT INTERIOR PHOTOGRAPH, HITCHEN AREA CRiGINA[. C~ W W ° ~ _S `.~ Q Q ~ ~~ '-' U ~ ~-' O ~~ ~ ® ~~ ~U v STREET SCENE, PAPAYA STREET FACING EAST SUBJECT LOCATED ON LEFT SIDE OF PHOTOGRAPH STREET SCENE, EAST SHORE DRIVE FACING NORTH SUBJECT LOCATED ON LEFT SIDE OF PHOTOGRAPH o~icNn~. SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS Address: 440 East Shore Drive, Clearwater Beach, Pinellas County, Florida 33767 Location: Northwest corner of Papaya Street and East Shore Drive Parcel Number: 08-29-15-16434-002-0150 Owner of Record: John H. & Christina Pimenidis Prospective Buyer: East Shore Development, LLC Contract Price: $1,360,000 Property Rights Appraised: Fee Simple Interest Effective Date of Valuation: September 6, 2005 Typing Date of Report: September 16, 2005 Proposed Improvements: The subject is an existing ten unit motel facility referred to as Koli-Bree Motel. The development consists of a two-story building containing 10 one-bedroom motel units. Land Area: 5,787 sf, or .133 acre, mol Density: 75.2 units per acre Zoning: Tourist (T), by the City of Clearwater Land Use Designation: Census Tract: Estimated Marketing Time Estimated Exposure Time ESTIMATES OF VALUE "As Is' Fee Simple Value: Cost Approach Sales Comparison Approach Final Value Estimate RFH, Resort Facility High 260.02 3-12 Months 3-12 Months $1,310,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 vi ~~~~~~~D OCT 17 2005 PIC `m OF CL4ARW~TERT ORGINAI. COMPLETE SUMMARY APPRAISAL REPORT Koli-Bree Motel A 10 Unit Motel Property 440 East Shore Drive Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 Marr File Number 08051345 SUMMARY APPRAISAL REPORT- LIMITED APPRAISAL This is a Summary Appraisal Report that is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2(b) of the Uniform Standards of Professional Practice for a Summary Appraisal Report. As such, it presents only summary discussions of the data, reasoning, and analyses that were used in the appraisal process to develop the appraiser's opinion of value. Supporting documentation concerning the data, reasoning, and analyses is retained in the appraiser's file. The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and for the intended use stated below. The appraiser is not responsible for unauthorized use of this report. Furthermore, in accordance with prior agreement between the client and the appraiser, this report is the result of a limited appraisal process in that certain allowable departures from specific guidelines of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice were invoked. The intended user of this report is warned that the reliability of the value conclusion provided maybe impacted to the degree there is departure from specific guidelines of USPAP. CLIENT Mr. Frank Hughes ' 106 Phillips Way ~~ Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 ~~~ ~~~ APPRAISER OCT 1 ~ 2405 Tod Marr, MAl, cc1M NNING DEPARjME~T State-certified general appraiser RZ1237 P C ~ ~F C~~~RWATER Brian D. DeMuth State-certified general appraiser RZ2473 ' Tod Marr & Associates 1 08051345 i~ i~ i~ G I~ PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL oR~s~ro~nl. The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the fee simple interest in the property described. DATE OF APPRAISAL The effective date of the appraisal is the date of the complete on-site inspection, September 6, 2005. The typing date of this report was September 16, 2005 INTENDED USER AND USE OF APPRALSAL ' The intended user of the report is Frank Hughes. The intended use of this report is to r:-.. ~,.,.~ ~. assist the client determining the depreciated value of the subject improvements for "-~ t+ ~~~~ potential renovation of the subject property. The appraiser is not responsible for ~ ~ ~~ ' unauthorized use of this report. s~ . t ~, ~' 2~~5 ' INTEREST APPRAISED ~l,~~1NlN~ DEPARTMEN` The fee simple interest of the property described herein has been appraised. Liens and') ~ ~~ ~1~+~~-RWATE~ t encumbrances, if any, have been disregarded and the property has been analyzed as though free and clear. APPRAISAL DEVELOPMENT & REPORTING PROCESS (SCOPE) In preparing this appraisal, we • Inspected the subject site and structure • Gathered and reviewed specific data such as survey, public record information and market data relative to the analysis of the subject • Gathered relevant data pertaining to the neighborhood from a personal inspection of the surrounding environs as well as local publications and real estate journals • Discussed market conditions and trends with local brokers, managers, developers, financial institutions and appropriate governmental agencies • Estimated the property's most probable and likely utilization under the basic real estate valuation principle of highest and best use • Gathered market information pertaining to land sales, cost data and improved sales for the analysis of the subject via the cost and sales comparison approaches to value. Per prior agreement with the client, the income capitalization approach to value was not used. Although this approach would generally be considered meaningful in appraising a property of this type, we believe the primary approaches to value are the cost and sales comparison approaches. The appraisal process therefore involved departure from Tod Marr & Associates 2 08051345 dards Rule 1-4 c . This Summ A raisal Re ort is a brief reca itulation of the Stan () ary pp p p data, analyses, and conclusions. Supporting documentation is retained in our file. DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this d the assin of title ~'' definition is the consummation of a sale, as of a specified date, an p g from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: ' a. Bu er and seller are icall motivated; Y ~ Y b. Both parties are well informed or well advised and each acting in what they consider their own best interest; c. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; d. Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial ' arrangements comparable thereto; and e. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 4"' edition Important elements affecting market value include the time element, neighborhood and economic changes, as well as anticipation thereof. Market prices do not necessarily ' follow all of these concepts and are often affected by salesmanship and the urgency and need of the buyer and/or the seller. DEFINITION OF FEE SIMPLE OWNERSHIP The total rights of an owner of real estate without having them split up into their various components such as having all or part of the property rented, leased, mineral rights sold, ' air rights, etc., and with the ability to mortgage or otherwise encumber the property. The Real Estate Appraisal Terminology book defines fee simple as "Fee without limitation to ' any particular class of heirs or restrictions, but subject to the limitations of eminent domain, escheat, police power, and taxation. An inheritable estate." ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Clearwater Beach Park 1St Addition Replat Block, Lot 15, as recorded in Plat Book 21, ' Page 21, Pinellas County, Florida The above legal description was obtained from tax rolls. It is assumed correct and no ' warranty is made as to its accuracy. ~~~~~~~ OCT 17 1005 Tod Marr & Associates 3 PL+°-NNING DEPARTMEiVT osos134s CITY OF CLEARWATER CP,iGINAf. TAX INFORMATION Owner of Record: John H. & Christina Pimenidis Census Tract: 260.02 Parcel Number: 08-29-15-16434-002-0150 Assessed Value: $340,000 (2004); $400,000 (2005 roposed Millage Rate: 22.9694 (2004); 23.2372 2005 roposed) Gross Real Estate Taxes: $7,809.60 (2004); $9,294.88 (2005 proposed) The subject's assessed value is well below its market value and current contract price of $1,360,000. It is our opinion that the subject assessed value and tax will increase. ZONING The subject is zoned "T", Tourist by the City of Clearwater. It has a Resort Facility High land use designation, which allows development of up to 30 residential dwellings or 40 hotel units per acre. The subject is currently operated as a motel and is grandfathered into its current zoning. FLOOD INFORMATION Per F1RM community panel number 12103C 0102G, map revised September 3, 2003, the subject site is located in flood zone "AE". The flood zone "AE" is areas of 100-year food; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. Flood insurance is typically required in these zones. The flood zone should be confirmed by a flood certification. SALES HISTORY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY According to public records, the subject property has not sold in the past five years. The subject is currently under contract for $1,360,000. The buyer is East Shore Development, LLC. The property was not actively marketed for sale. The buyer was aware that the seller was interested in selling the property and the sale price was negotiated. The buyer has subsequently assigned the contract to DexCo Landholding Company of Tampa Bay, Inc & Dr. Leonard Kronen (assignee). The assignment fee is $500,000, reflecting a total contract and assignment cost of $1,860,000. HIDDEN CONDITIONS We assume that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil or structures that would make it more or less valuable than otherwise apparently comparable property. We assume no responsibility for such or for engineering which might be required to discover such conditions. ~ ~; ~'~ ~ (~ ~~( j ~ ~ j Tod Marr & Associates 4 PLANNIfVG DEP/gRTMENT 08051345 CIT1(OF CL~RWATER QRiGIiJrlf_ AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 sets strict and specific standards for handicapped access to and within most commercial and industrial buildings. Determination of compliance with these standards is beyond appraisal expertise. We assume no responsibility for the cost of such determination and this appraisal is subject to revision if the improvements are not in compliance. ~~~~9~~ OC I~ 17 2Q05 Tod Marr & Associates 5 P(AI~INING DEPARTMENT osos134s CITY OF CLE~IRWATER GRlG;iJAL ~Gu/t 4 ~~ a -~,~~~,~- NUDSONi Of BAYONET -Mexico _PO1~ ~.~~: a~ t iii pHOLID/ ~'.< - TARPONt` SPRINGS r cnnra~u.<ii .PAL NARBO u.~y, 4 DUNEDIN ~_ i ®a+ aUlf ;L' SARI ~~ ~_ 1 ~ s q~: :~ ~:. ~!o € ~,. --.=!U.~.v. n ...~lllli ...."!}FC ~~^ ~r ~~_ ~i~. _ .~=t s" Bay --. ~,~,.a..~uKl~tyiJl_fy^:. P~w~A14UMAY 712 ~ ~~• P .m.s~r J •i..`g°" Ufa cU~v ,.... ~' K1pOS ~ is Y X / _ .o ~ y~an bt rouPSourrz St. P^lersburh. Fl. Milit 13~ Ivlezico s,: _ ... ST. PETE REGIONAL MAP Tod Marr & Associates 6 OCT 17 2005 PLp-NNING DEPARTMEfVT CITY OF CLE~1R4~osa~~~~4s i~ i~ i~ n IJ ORi~INAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION A neighborhood can be a portion of a city, community or an entire town. It is usually considered to be an area that exhibits a fairly high degree of homogeneous, as to use, tenancy and certain other characteristics. Homogeneity is a state of uniform structure or composition throughout. Therefore, in real estate terminology, a homogeneous neighborhood is one which the property types and uses are similar. A neighborhood is more or less a unified area with somewhat different boundaries. The neighborhood boundaries could be defined as the Intracoastal Waterway and Clearwater Harbor to the east, the Gulf of Mexico to the west, Belleair Beach to the south and Caladesi Island to the north. Clearwater Beach is abeach-front community with a heavy concentration of beach-front condominiums, hotels and retail buildings. The neighborhood is heavily tourist and recreation oriented due to the long expanse of beach frontage. The area is fully developed with a good mix of residential and commercial properties. ',' The main traffic arteries are typically lined with commercial improvements. The improvements in the neighborhood are generally maintained in good condition. ' The commercial properties in the neighborhood range dramatically in construction quality, size, age and condition. The buildings are typically masonry structures with one to several units. Commercial improvements in the area include offices, convenience stores, restaurants, small retail centers, single user retail buildings, motels and hotels. New construction and/or renovations of existing commercial structures have been occurring in the area. The southern portion of the neighborhood, south of Clearwater Pass, is referred to as Sand Key. The main arterial road is Gulf Boulevard, which connects Clearwater Beach to ' the beach communities to the south. In the Sand Key area the west side of Gulf Boulevard is lined with condominiums, a hotel facility and Sand Key County Park, a public beach access. The east side of Gulf Boulevard is also lined with condominiums ~ complexes, a retail plaza and a hotel facility. Commercial properties are typically located along Gulfview Boulevard and Mandalay Avenue. Demand for retail space in the subject market area is good. Predominant rental rates for retail space in the area are between $17.00 and $35.00 a square foot, net. Occupancy levels are good and are generally between 95% and 100%. Most retail buildings in the area sell between $175.00 and $400.00 a square foot. Newer, good quality buildings typically represent the upper end of the range. Land to building ratios range from about 2.0:1.0 to 5.0:1.0. The main roads in the neighborhood include Gulf Boulevard, Mandalay Avenue, Gulfview Boulevard and Memorial Causeway. Gulfview provides access from Sand Key to the central area of Clearwater Beach. Mandalay Avenue provides access to the northern portion of the neighborhood and Memorial Causeway provides access to the mainland, downtown Clearwater. The subject neighborhood, north of Clearwater Pass and south of Caladesi Island, is developed primarily ~ a mi of co~'mt~nerc ~I tourist Tod Marr & Associates 7 ~~~ 1 ~ Z~Q~ 08051345 p~[iINING DEPARTMENT ~ CRIGiI'J~1~ type facilities, condominiums and single family homes. The extreme north end of ' Clearwater Beach is developed with single family homes. Notable subdivisions include Mandalay Point, Carlouel, Mandalay Subdivision, and Clearwater Beach subdivision. Homes were primarily built from the early 1950's through the present and pnces typically ~ range between $400,000 to over $2,500,000. There are numerous condominium and townhome developments being constructed in ' Pinellas County, on the Gulf Beaches and the Intracoastal Waterway. These developments are typically being constructed of above average to excellent quality and benefit from their waterfront locations. The units are typically between 1,500 sf and ' 4,900 sf and include covered parking. The pricing of these developments are typically from $600,000 to over $3,000,000. Based on conversations with local real estate agents and brokers, absorption rates for the new developments range between .5 and over 5 units per month. Many of the smaller developments are sold out prior to, or within several months of their certificates of occupancy. ' Within the subject neighborhood, there are a number of new condominium and townhome developments being constructed. There is a considerable amount of new ' development occurring on Brightwater Drive and Bayway Boulevard. These are deep water canals which access Clearwater Harbor. Two new developments are occurring on Sand Key; Bella Rosa and Utopia. Mandalay Beach Club is a newly developed condominium complex that was recently competed by JMC Communities. It is located on Clearwater Beach, between Papaya ' Street and San Marco Street, adjacent to the Gulf of Mexico. This is a two phase, 165 unit complex. The units typically range in size from 1,460 sf to over 2,600 sf and sell between $475,000 and $1,000,000+. The development includes several larger units, 3,000 to 4,000 sf, which are priced between $1,500,000 to over $2,000,000+. This property was indicated to have sold in December 2002. The developer began selling units in April 2000, a marketing period of roughly 2 years and 8 months, reflecting a net ' absorption rate of 5.16 units per month, or 15.5 units per quarter. The same developer is currently constructing Belle Harbor, a condominium development ' which fronts on Clearwater Harbor. It is located on Clearwater Beach at the northeast corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. This is a two phase, 200 unit complex. The prices range between $464,000 and $1,900,000+. The property was indicated to have ' begun selling in August 2002 and sold out in roughly 24 months, reflecting a net absorption rate of roughly 8.3 units per month. The Clearwater Beach area is well served by local utilities and government services. Downtown Clearwater is located within close proximity to the east. Recreational and ' social amenities are abundant in the area. The area is fully developed and new development is through razing of older existing structures. Existing properties are typically adequately maintained and demand for commercial and residential properties is ' in line with current supply. ~~~~~~~0 OCT 17 1005 Tod Marr & Associates 8 08051345 pUa-NNING DEPARTMENT ~~~ ~~ ~i ~~-~in~~~~~ n ~~ `~~ ' ~LC1 i y ' '`~~~yyy',,, r~ ~ti F t _ 4 J, o_ ~' ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ - C ^~r ~ ~ Q ~L ~ 1__. Y ~" ~~~r . T~ .~ ~~'Li i ~ - Zii ~ ~'~~ i . ' D ~ °~C 24b '' X99 ~``~' ~ k+E~ ~ 153 ~ I^ Q ~~i^ ~~. ~. Ft ;Corp. andlbr rt'st'suppliers:,ill}ngliRslrieservecJ~. ` 1 ~(~ ° r-~~n ~r-~~,, i~C NEIGHBORHOOD MAP Tool Marr & Associates 9 08051345 CRiGifvr1i_ SITE DESCRIPTION Location The subject is located on the north side of Papaya Street, adjacent to the west side of East Shore Drive and the west side of Poinsettia Street, within the city limits of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. The site is located to the immediate west and south of residential development, immediately north of a retail store (True Value Hardware) and east of a restaurant parking lot. It is located one block west of the Clearwater Harbor and two blocks east of the beach. Dimensions and Shape The subject site is basically rectangular. Based on tax maps, the site contains a total area of 5,787 sf, or .133 acre, mol. The site has roughly 50 feet of street frontage on East Shore Drive and Poinsettia Street, and 115.7 feet along the north side of Papaya Street. Ingress/Egress (Access) Access to the site is from Papaya Street. Papaya Street, East Shore Drive and Poinsettia are local two-lane roads. Access to the subject is considered good. Topography and Soil The site is generally level and near street grade. The existing drainage of the site appears to be adequate. While a soil study was not supplied, none of the surrounding improvements display any of the characteristics which would indicate adverse soil conditions. However, prior uses of the site and surrounding properties are unknown. We are not experts in this field and no warranty as to soil or subsoil is given. Utilities All utilities are currently available to the site. Electric service is available from Progress Energy Florida and telephone service is available from Verizon. Water, sewer, police and fire protection are supplied by the City of Clearwater. Improvements The site is currently improved with a ten unit motel referred to as Koli-Bree Motel. Each unit includes one-bedroom, bath, living area and kitchen area. The improvements consist of a two-story building. The development also includes asphalt parking, concrete walks, concrete block patio, fencing and signage. ~~~~~~ /]~® OCT 1 '7 2005 Tod Marr & Associates 10 Plp-(~1Nit~G ~DEPARTNIENT osos134s CITY OF CLE~IRWATER OCT 1 "~ 2005 Nuisances and Hazards PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORi~i~'v 11. ' , No adverse nuisances or hazards were observed. Per FIRM community panel number 12103C 0102G, map revised September 3, 2003, the subject site is located in flood zone ' "AE". The flood zone "AE" is areas of 100-year food; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. Flood insurance is typically required in these zones. The flood zone should be confirmed by a flood certification. ' Easements and Encroachments No adverse easements or encroachments which would affect the subject were observed at the time of the physical inspection or from a review of survey provided. It is assumed that none are present. Concurrency ' The enactment of Concurrency Laws in the state of Florida, which became effective January 1, 1990, can directly impact on the use of a site. Concurrency is part of the 1985 Growth Management Act, which states in part that all of an area's infrastructure which ' are or will be affected by the development of a property must be in place or concurrent with development and must be adequate. The major items of Concurrency which affect most projects are sewers, water service, and roads. Streets in the county are now rated according to their service level with an "A" rating being given to streets experiencing no traffic problems to an "F" rating for those with heavy traffic and related problems. Concurrency laws may require the developer to pave, widen and/or construct existing or additional roads to carry the burden of the additional traffic or to participate in the cost of construction to provide water and sewer service. The subject is developed; therefore Concurrency would not adversely affect the subject parcel. Zoning The subject is zoned "T", Tourist by the City of Clearwater. It has a Resort Facility High land use designation, which allows development of up to 30 residential dwellings or 40 hotel units per acre. The subject is currently operated as a motel and is grandfathered into its current zoning. Conclusion In summary, the site is located at the northwest corner of East Shore Drive and Papaya Street, within the city limits of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. The site is located roughly two blocks from the Gulf of Mexico. The site is 5,787 square feet. It is zoned Tourist by the City of Clearwater with a Resort Facility High land use designation. Based on our analysis, the site appears well suited for residential type development. Tod Marr & Associates 11 08051345 ~~~j~~~~~~~, ccT 17 zoos Pt~-iVNi(~G DE~ARTME(VT ORIGINAf_ tr''~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ 7 9~.6 ~ ~ ~ 115.E I ~ ~ y ~a r ~ ~°' I1~.2 I15.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~oe.~ ~~ I~ I~ ~ ~ Q o ~ ~ I I ~ ~~ ~I I I~ ~ ~- I~ ~ ~ 13 c1° I ~ a r ~ I I I~ I~ ~ I~ ~ ~ 15 c,ir l i ~ S71~J ~ - ~ ' IIV. • ~ 114J4 Jf 1 7 1 ~ I~~rs~ • 1 II$.3 ._......_......_.... I ~ ~ I ~ L ~- L ~' I ~~~~~ 1 ~y ~rryyy ~~++ 3~ CCL7eJ ~ + ..... ..~ .... ..... .. ... 1 ~ ~ ~'~~,+ ~ r ~ ~~ rr~ ~ ~ ~ ~J J~ j L/ ~~f ~~ 1~ /~~y T\ ..._._.... ~.. .. .._.. .._._.. ..~.. ..~.~.. .. ~ ~ 1 I ~ rr 1 ' ~ I J, ~ ~ fL_"Yl ~ I I {,J~ • ~ 11 ~ 1 118-3 ' 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~1 r ~ ~ ~ //'''yy ~ ~ F+I'11. TAX MAP Tod Marr & Associates ~~~~~ V ~~ ' OCT 17 2005 QRIGI"vi1~_ IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION PLANi~ING ~EF~4RTMENT ' CITY OF ClE~1RWATER The subject is improved with a motel facility consisting often units referred to as Koli- '' Bree Motel. The first floor is finished with five one-bedroom units and a large office- , storage area. The second floor is finished with five one-bedroom units. '' There are basically two different unit types. The two corner units located at the east end of the building are one-bedroom units with full kitchens, bath and living rooms. They are roughly 24'x 26.1' (626 sf) in size. The remaining units (8 units) are one-bedroom units ' with kitchenettes, bath and living room. These units are roughly 17.5' x 26.1' (457 sf). The property also includes an office area and a storage area which includes a full bath. All units are accessed from exterior hallways located along the building's southern elevation. All units have a view of the parking area and other structures. The property is provided two exterior staircases for access to the second floor. Refer to the building plans at the end of the improvement section for a visual depiction. The building is built of concrete block construction with abuilt-up composite roof cover. The foundation is poured concrete. The building is average quality construction. The windows are a mix of awning and jalousie type and the exterior doors are metal with half moon windows. Cooling is by individual wall units and heating is by individual gas furnaces. The improvements contain 5,484 square feet of gross building area. Dividing the building size by the number of units (10) indicates an average unit size 548 square feet. Each unit includes a kitchen area. The interior finish of the units is considered average quality and the units are maintained in overall average to good condition. The floor coverings are a mix of ceramic the and carpet. The interior walls and ceilings are finished painted plaster. The typical kitchen will include a refrigerator and range/oven. The units are accessed from exterior, covered walkways. The subject structure was built in 1950 with an actual age of 55 years. The wall unit air ' conditioners have been updated, the roof covering was indicated to have been replaced roughly five years ago and the electric service has been updated. The property is owner managed and the property has been well maintained. No items of deferred maintenance ' were observed. The subject's effective age is estimated at roughly 20-25 years. Based on the Marshall Valuation Service, the subject would be classified as being an average to ' good cost development with an economic life of roughly 55 years. The improvements are similar to other motel facilities in the area and no external or measurable functional obsolescence was noted. In summary, the subject is a 10 unit motel property referred to as Koli-Bree. The structure is average quality masonry construction and is maintained in average to good condition. Tod Marr & Associates 13 08051345 cR~~c~t~~~~ SKETCH/AREATABLEADDEtyDUM Case No RIeNo 1348 Prc~ty Add2ss140 East Shve D rive City ClearWata Beach County Stye Zp LerdedCl ient L/C Address Aooraiser Name Appr Address Bed Bedroom ~ Bath eeoroom Unit Unit Unit Y 16 17 18 Unit 19 Unit 20 Y Living room ~~ Entry Sta 5 Sta 5 iy Apez IV WlnUOwa^ AREA CALCULATIONS SUMv1ARY Code Desaipiim Sia Tads (;8A7 Fiat F1Wr 2453.40 Fiat Plmr 577.58 Seocerd Floor 2453.40 5484.38 P/P Ornered ffitzy 629.60 CUeieO ffitry 629.80 1259.60 TOTAL BULDING (rounded) I 5484 APEX 9JFTWAFE 400-a 50-8858 BUILDING PLAN SECOND RDOR ~~~:}~~~~~~~D ~-"~-~ ~ 1 2005 GROUND RDOR ~~'~~~~!~ flEPARTMEf1l~' " CI~'1P' t~F ~°L.~~RUTATFI? Scale: 1 =2 BUILDING AREA BREAI•mOWN Brealalwvn SW7bhals Fiat Flmr 26.1 x 94.0 249.40 0.5 x 3.0 x 0.3 0.45 3.6 x 4.7 ]b.92 7.7 x 38.1 293.37 2.3 x 41.7 95.91 0.5 x 0.5 x 3.3 0.76 0.5 x 3.9 x 22.3 43.24 0.5 x 19.1 x 3.3 31.59 3.3 x 22.7 75.02 0.5 x 0.6 x 0.8 0.32 0.5 x 4.0 x 10.0 711.00 Seed FlOOr 26.1 x 94.0 249.40 12 Areas Total (rounded) 5484 Apyrroo.. Tod Marc & Associates 14 08051345 aa.o to.o• ea.o• ~~~~~~~~ HIGHEST AND BEST USE '' ~ The highest and best use is defined as: The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property, which is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value. The four criteria the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum profitability. ' Highest and Best Use as Though Vacant ' Highest and best use of land or a site as though vacant is defined as: Among all reasonable, alternative uses, the use that yields the highest present land value, after payments are made for labor, capital, and coordination. The use of a property based on the assumption that the parcel of land is vacant or can be made vacant by demolishing any improvement. ' The subject site is 5,78713 square feet. It is located in a tourist orientated area of northern Clearwater Beach, roughly two blocks east of the Gulf of Mexico. The site is zoned Tourist with a Resort Facility High land use designation. This zoning ' classification permits attached dwellings, overnight accommodations, offices, restaurants, nightclubs, medical clinics, etc. Considering the subject's location and physical characteristics as well as current market conditions, the maximally productive and highest and best use of the subject site as though vacant, would be development of attached dwellings. The zoning permits development of up to 30 units per acre, or a total of three ' units. Due to the subject's small site size, it is likely that a prospective developer would attempt to assemble surrounding parcels with the property. Highest and Best Use as Improved The subject of this report consists of a ten unit motel property referred to as Koli-Bree ' Motel. It consists of a two-story building and all units are one-bedroom. The quality of the development is considered average and the amenities and common recreation facilities are considered similar to comparable projects. High density, non-waterfront motel facilities like the subject in the northern Clearwater Beach area are commonly being purchased for conversion to condominium-hotel facilities. Demand for this type of development has been good, with many of the developments being sold out prior to completion of the conversion. The prices of these type units have been increasing significantly over the past several years and should continue to do so m the near future. The value of the site with the proposed improvements exceeds the site value alone. Thus, the highest and best use of the site is to renovate the existing improvements for conversion of the hotel facility to a ten unit condominium-hotel development. ~~~~~~ uc i 1 ~ zoo5 .Tod Marr & Associates i s PLANNING ~DEPARTMEfVT osos134s CITY OF CLEARWATER ocrizzuos CP.IGINAi_ PL~-NNiNG ~EP,gRT~IENT THE VALUATION PROCESS CITY OF CLE~sRWATER The estimate of market value for real property involves a systematic process in which the problem is defined, the work necessary to solve the problem is planned, and the data required; is acquired, classified, analyzed and interpreted into an estimate of value. In this process, three approaches are used by the appraiser to estimate value. They are: THE COST APPROACH THE SALES COMPARISON APPROACH THE INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH The cost approach is a method in which the value of a property is derived from creating a substitute property with the same utility as the subject property. In the cost approach, the appraiser must estimate the market value of the subject site as if vacant, by using the direct sales comparison approach, then estimate the reproduction cost new of the improvements. Depreciation from all sources is estimated and subtracted from the reproduction cost new of the improvements. The depreciated reproduction cost of all improvements is then added to the estimated site value with the results being an indicated value by the cost approach. The sales comparison approach also referred to as the market approach, involves the comparison of similar properties that have recently sold or similar properties that are currently offered for sale, with the subject property. The basic principle of substitution underlies this approach. It implies that an informed purchaser would not pay more for a property than the cost to acquire a satisfactory substitute property with the same utility as the subject property in the current market. These properties are compared to the subject with regard to differences or similarities in time, age, location, physical characteristics, and the conditions influencing the sale. The notable differences in the comparable properties are adjusted to the subject property to indicate a value range for the property being appraised. The principle of increasing and decreasing returns is important in identification of comparables. The principle of contribution is the heart of the adjustment process in determining the effect that the presence or absence of some characteristic has on the sale price. When sufficient sales data is available, these adjustments are best determined by the actions of typical buyers and sellers in the subjects market place. This value range, as indicated by the adjusted comparable properties, is reconciled into a final indicated value for the subject property by this approach. The income capitalization approach is a process which discounts anticipated income ' streams (whether in dollar income or amenity benefits) to a present worth figure through the capitalization process. The appraiser is again faced with obtaining certain data related to the subject and comparing it to similar physical, functional and economic properties. I'' Comparable rental information is analyzed to estimate potential gross income (actual and/or comparative) to determine a projected net income stream. The appraiser must estimate a ' Tod Marr & Associates 16 08051345 ~ c^~c~r~~a~ ' ca italization rate, either through extraction from the market or using other available p techniques. The net income stream is capitalized into an indicated value by this approach. ~ The value estimates as indicated by the three approaches are then reconciled into a final estimate of the property's value. In the final reconciliation, the appraiser must weigh the relative significance, defensibility, amount and accuracy of data, and applicability of each approach as it pertains to the type of property being appraised and that best approximates ' the value being sought in the appraisal. For purposes of this analysis, we have relied on the cost and sales comparison approaches to ' value. These are considered to be the most reliable indicators of value for the subject property. ~'~~G~I~~DD c~cr 1 ~ 2005 PLANNING DEPARTiUIENt CITY OF CLE~RWA~TER Tod Marr & Associates 17 08051345 ~~~~~~~~ ' THE COST APPROACH ' The basic premise, upon which this method of value estimate is based, is known as the principle of substitution. This principle logically states; "a prudent purchaser of a particular property would be willing to pay no more for that property than the cost of acquiring an equally desirable substitute." ' It is acknowledged that one principal method of acquiring a substitute property would be realized by the reproduction (or replacement) of the improvements of commensurate utility on an equally desirable site. This approach is most valid when analyzing new improvements which have not ' experienced any loss in value through normal wear and tear, or other forms of depreciation. Therefore, the cost approach estimates the current market value of a property through a process in ' which the replacement cost of all improvements are estimated. From this figure is deducted the total estimated loss in value (depreciation) for the improvements. The basic steps used in this approach are outlined below: ' Stepl Estimate the current market value of the site. The site is valued as if vacant and free to be used in a capacity representing its highest and best use. This step is accomplished through ' the analysis of the sales and listings of comparable commercial sites. Step 2 Estimate the replacement cost new, of the subject improvements. This step results in the appraisers' estimate of the total cost of replacing a structure with similarity to the subject ' improvements. The replacement cost estimate associated with this appraisal uses the estimated cost per square foot. The method of estimating this cost factor is fully described ' later in this report. Step 3 Estimate the total accrued depreciation. This refers to the total loss in value, which the ' subject property may have experienced through physical, functional, or external factors, which would negatively influence the value of the property . Step 4 Deduct the total estimated depreciation (Step 3) from the reproduction cost estimate (Step 2) and add the current value estimate for the site (Step 1). The resulting figures represent the appraisers' estimate of the current market value of the subject via the cost approach. Estimate of Land Value The valuation of vacant land (Step 1) is typically undertaken by the sales comparison approach ' (market approach). The application of this approach produces a value estimate for land by comparing it with similar properties that have recently sold, in the same or competitive neighborhoods. The sale price of these properties tends to set the range of value in which the ' subject property will fall, when reduced to an appropriate unit of comparison (price per square foot, per front foot, per unit, etc.). Refinement of this data, by the comparative process, should lead to a logical estimate of market value as of the date of appraisal. ' The reliability of this technique is dependent upon (1) the degree of comparability of each sale to the subject, (2) market conditions at the time of sale, (3) verification of pertinent data, and (4) the absence of unusual conditions that influence the sale. Information on those sales considered to be most comparable to the subject property are set forth in the following pages. ~~~~~~~~ OCT 17 2005 ' Tod Marr ~ Associates 18 PLp1NNING ~EPARTMEMT 08051345 CITY OF CLE~RWl~TER oR~sird~a~ LAND COMPARABLE NO 1: Location: 408 East Shore Drive, east side of East Shore Drive, north of Causeway Boulevard, Clearwater Beach Parcel Number: 08-29-15-02592-002-0090 Date of Sale: July 2005 Grantor: Traveler Motel, Inc. Grantee: Eastshore Development of Clearwater, LLC O.R. Book/Page: 14439-2474 Zoning: Tourist Topography: Basically Level Shape: Rectangular Utilities: Available Sale Price: $1,600,000 Financing: Cash to Seller Size: 11,500 sf or .264 acres, mol Allowed Units: 7 units Price Per SF: $139.13 Price Per Allowed Unit: $228,571 Comments: This is the sal e of a ten unit motel facility on Clearwater Beach. The grantee is assembling several addi tional waterfront sites in the area and plans to redevelop this parcel with townhomes or a mixed use type development. ~-, ~~~.~ m `° +~ I rJ 22,5.5 ~ vQj ~ n ~ g'. ti 16 I7 2~6 ~ ~ { ~ '. a I$ ~~ ~ o _ `'t ~ - ``t ~ ~ 129[5) ' '.._...._...._ ........................... ~,. Ig ~ 2 20 ~ 3 i18 3 ~ d lfl ~ ~ 10 _ ~ ~ OB. !4 ~ ~ ~ I °~oe_~22 ~~ II a ~ .._......_. 16o{57 II ..._..........._._....... n 24 31 ~ ~ ~ ~ +kJ 12 Is~cs~ 12 ' '._......_......_......_. ............. ~5 2~ 30 '~ 13 ° `° ~7~[sa 13 ' 'n ~ ~~ 2~ o 7 cfl 14 pg,2 115. 178[S) 9 [RIVE ---- -----~ ~~ ei ii~,3 ,~ 1~ i74 i6ats7 ~~s ~°rs w~ Tod Marr & Associates OCT 1 '7 20Q5 PLANN~f~G ~EPAI2TMEf~T 19 CITY OF CLEr~-R~ilATER 08051345 CR~G,fvAi. LAND COMPARABLE NO 2: Location: 35 Devon Drive, southeast corner of Coronado Drive and 1St Street (Devon Drive), Clearwater Beach Parcel Number: 08-29-15-17550-002-0012 Date of Sale: June 2005 Grantor: Tadeusz & Margar Niemyj ski Grantee: Decade Gulfcoast, LP O.R. Book/Page: 14349-661 Zoning: Tourist Topography: Basically Level Shape: Rectangular Utilities: Available Sale Price: $1,350,000 Financing: Cash to Seller Size: 11,000 sf, or .253 acre, mol Allowed Units: 7 units Price Per SF: $122.73 Price Per Allowed Unit: $192,857 Comments: This is the sal e of a fifteen unit motel facility on Clearwater Beach. The motel has subsequently been closed and the site was purchased for redevelopment. ~~~ ~~~ ~ a r2& M u~ ~~CS~ 2 ros ~~~ ~~ d rro ~ cu `~ es ra m ~, 484850 Si 94~58~~7 rro 0° ,~ 40 °~ r2s ~. ~ ~ ~a ~ 52 ro5 0 ~ ~ $ v~ •~, ~ B , S ~s~ r i 0 o r o `~ i l0 o °D ~ ~ `~~ c°u 53 99 3 Q '~ 100 roS r~ rlrS ~ ~`~o ~ 7 ~ 8 m ~ 64 y ~ ~t ~ ~ ~0 ~ ~ ~ f` ~ 9 210 u~ ~ ~ ~! e ,. Go =? Z~ o° 55 ~ 02 0 4 +o rrs s ` `~ 8~•~ .5~ o r10 ~n ~ °o ~ ``~ S~ ~~ s0 ~ d ~ - ~ ~ CC7 OCT 17 2005 PLAI~NI'i~0 ~EI~A~T~IIENT CITY 0>= C1~~R~NAT~R Tod Marr & Associates 20 08051345 CRiGitJAL. LAND COMPARABLE NO 3: Location: 41 Devon Drive, southwest corner of Hamden Drive and lst Street (Devon Drive), Clearwater Beach Parcel Number: 08-29-15-17550-002-0011 Date of Sale: March 2005 Grantor: Krystyna Brzezny Grantee: Dam Devon, LLC O.R. Book/Page: 14157-1556 Zoning: Tourist Topography: Basically Level Shape: Rectangular Utilities: Available Sale Price: $2,400,000 Financing: Cash to Seller Size: 16,500 sf, or .379 acre, mol Allowed Units: 11 units Price Per SF: $145.45 Price Per Allowed Unit: $218,182 Comments: This is the sale of a 24 unit motel facility on Clearwater Beach. The property was indicated to have been purchased for future redevelopment and the improvements were indicated to have no contributory value. ~~ ros ro j7` ~~ d rro ~ 3 `° es ~ ~, 484050 Si 9495~~~7 rra $ } ~o 0~ r~s A a ~ tD h ~~ ~ N b2 ros o 1 •~ B ti3 S ~~~ rio o r n°, `,~3 99 o ~' iio rt?S ~ o ao rrS ~ g ~~ fro :~' 7 ~ ~ 54 100 m y ~ ~r ~ m ~~~~ ~~, ~~ ~ ~ ' ' $ 9 zoo ,~ ~ ~, --- ,~. o° 55 lag o 56 4 ra o rro ~ ° rrs 3 0 ~',L ~~,s ~2 S~ 4 ea s so a `n ~ ~ ~ 220 o ~ ~7 X04 p 4 ~«~~- 1~~ r` 53 ~ ~ ~~ ` ~P , ~~~~r~~~J~f~ OCT 17 2005 PLANNi~'C ~~~~~TMENT CITY OF CLRW~iER Tod Marr & Associates 21 08051345 i a ~ i k ~~U > >.. _ ~ c~ +~1 ~~ ~' ~ ~ ~. i ~~ .~~~; ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~. ~~~ ~~~'. ~~ Q ~~y .~ : _ sueaE _'-~ f I~}J,~~ ~J ~ f~ ~~ ~i ~ ~~~ ~+ ~ L~j ~ -- ~~~ - _. ~_~ ! ` ~`~~ i ,~. ~.~,. ~~. , ~ ~~ II ~ Y ~rri~nftzfnm`-.anrl7n`ritc~i inrS~iar^~-:t~111"nnlit~ra~nrail~-.~-. Tod Marr & Associates LAND COMPARABLE LOCATION MAP ~~~~, v ~`~ OCT 17 1(105 as PLANi~li~~os~s~4s~IUlENT C~T~ ~F ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~'~ LAND COMPARABLE COMPARISON CHART NAME SALE PRICE LOCATION LAND SIZE (SQ. FT.) LAND SIZE (ACRES) ALLOWED UNITS DENSITY (U.P.A.) PRICE/SF PRICE/IJNIT DATE OF APPRAISAUSALE MONTHS SINCE SALE ADJUSTMENTS FINANCING/CONDITIONS OF SALE FIN/COND OF SALE ADJ PRICE MARKET CONDITIONS ADJUSTMENT TIME ADJUSTED SALE PRICE PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS LOCATION TOPOGRAPHY LAND SIZE (SQ. FT.) SHAPE ZONING DENSITY (U.P.A.) ADJUSTMENTS (SQ.FT.) LOCATION TOPOGRAPHY LAND SIZE (SQ. FT.) SHAPE ZONING DENSITY (U.P.A.) NET PROPERTY ADJUSTMENT ANALYSIS ADJUSTED PRICE ADJUSTED PRICE/SQ. FT. ADJUSTMENTS (UNIT): LOCATION TOPOGRAPHY LAND SIZE (SQ. FT.) SHAPE ZONING DENSITY (U.P.A.) NET PROPERTY ADJUSTMENT ANALYSIS ADJUSTED PRICE ADJUSTED PRICE/UNIT SUBJECT East Shore Drive Clearwater Beach 5,787 0.133 3 22.6 Sep-OS COMP. #1 COMP. #2 COMP. #3 $1,600,000 $1,350,000 $2,400,000 East Shore Drive Devon Drive Devon Drive Clearwater Beach Clearwater Beach Clearwater Beach 11,500 11,000 16,500 0.264 0.253 0.379 7 7 11 26.5 27.7 29.0 $139.13 $122.73 $145.45 $228,571 $192,857 $218,182 Jul-OS Jun-OS Mar-OS 2 3 6 0% 0% 0% $1,600,000 $1,350,000 $2,400,000 4% 6% 13% $1,664,000 $1,431,000 $2,712,000 Tod Marr & Associates East Shore Drive East Shore Drive Devon Drive Devon Drive Level, Improved Level, Improved Level, Improved Level, Improved 5,787 11,500 11,000 16,500 Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular Tourist Tourist Tourist Tourist 22.6 26.5 27.7 29.0 East Shore Drive 0% -5% -5% Level,Improved 0% 0% 0% 5,787 0% 0% 0% Rectangular 0% 0% 0% Tourist 0% 0% 0% 22.6 -6% -8% -10% -6% -13% -15% $1,564,160 $1,244,970 $2,305,200 $136.01 $113.18 $139.71 East Shore Drive 0% -5% -5% Level,Improved 0% 0% 0% 5,787 0% 0% 0% Rectangular 0% 0% 0% Tourist 0% 0% 0% 22.6 6% 8% 10% 6% 3% $% $1,763,840 $1,473,930 $2,847,600 $251,977 $210561 $258,873 ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ OC fi 17 2005 PLAi~~ii1~0 ~~i'~RTMCNT 23 CITY OF CL~~~~~i~lATER osos134s ~.~ ~ 'is~ 6 6~~ ~~ CORRELATION AND CONCLUSION The three comparables provided were among the most recent pertinent sales found in the Clearwater Beach area. Comparable 1 is located along the subject street, roughly one block south. It is the sale of a motel facility that was purchased for redevelopment with two waterfront sites (across street). comparables 2 and 3 are located on southern Clearwater Beach. They are in an area planned for extensive redevelopment and are considered to have superior locations. These two parcels were also purchased for redevelopment. The subject density is below the range of the comparables. Density has a direct relationship with price per square foot, or as the density increases, the price per square foot increases. It has an indirect relationship with price per unit, or as the density increases, the price per unit decreases. The comparables were adjusted accordingly. Due to its proximity to the subject, comparable 1 has been given primary consideration. It has an adjusted sale price of $136.01 per square foot and $251,977 per unit. comparables 2 and 3 support this value indication and have been given close secondary consideration. They have adjusted sale prices of $113.18/sf and $210,561/unit, and $139.71/sf and $258,873/unit, respectively. The subject's density is below the range of the comparables, therefore its price per unit has been estimated at the upper end of the range. Therefore, based on our analysis, the market value of the site is estimated at $135.00 per square foot and $255,000 per unit. Thus, the value of the subject site is estimated as follows: $135.00/sf x 5,787 sf = $781,245 Rounded to: $780,000 $255,000/LTnit x 3 Units = $765,000 Based on our analysis, non-waterfront parcels with Tourist zoning classifications in the subject market area are being purchased for both multi-family residential and mixed use type development. The price per square foot is considered the most reliable and has been given primary consideration. Therefore the value of the subject site has been estimated at: SEVEN HUNDRED EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($780,000) ~ ~ ~ ~~ 44411 ~.J i ~~~ l ~ } !~ ~ :! ~ t~ aC~ 17 2005 PLP-NNI~?0 ~~PA~~i~ENT CIT1(OF C~.~~~~~1A7E~ Tod Marc & Associates 24 08051345 ORIGINAL REPLACEMENT COST OF IMPROVEMENTS The next step in the cost approach is to estimate the cost of replacing the existing improvements. The costs used in the following analysis have been derived from cost estimates of similar buildings and from the Marshall Valuation Service Publications, a national construction cost estimate service. This estimate includes all costs except impact fees, and the developer overhead and profit which are added in separately. Structure Based on section 12, page 9 of the Marshall Valuation Service, the subject would be classified as being a good class "C" motel building and the replacement cost is estimated at $87.28/sf. This cost is average for the United States and must be adjusted. Based on the Marshall Valuation Service, the building area multiplier is estimated at .958, the story height multiplier is estimated at 1.03, the current cost multiplier is estimated at 1.08, the local multiplier is estimated at .98 and the resort location multiplier is estimated at 1.30. Based on these figures the replacement cost per square foot is estimated as follows: $87.28 x .958 x 1.03 x 1.08 x .98 x 1.30 = $118.50 The subject includes roughly 1,260 square feet of covered entries. The cost of the covered entries has been estimated at $35.00 a square foot. The subject also includes kitchen areas, which have an estimated cost of $2,800 per unit. Soft Costs and Impact Fees Miscellaneous soft costs not included in the Marshall Valuation Service are estimated at 5% of the total building cost. Because of the impact of new development on the infrastructure of cities and counties, fees are now typically being assessed against new development. These fees are for the effects of increased traffic, increased use of sewers and water, radon detection, fire fighting requirements and the like. These are known as impact fees and can add substantially to the cost of new development. The impact fee estimates used in this report were based on the City of Clearwater's and Pinellas County's fee schedule and are estimated at $20,000. DEVELOPER (ENTREPRENEURIAL) PROFIT The above costs include contractors, but not developer profit. Developer profit is the reward the developer receives for taking the risk of developing the property. Developer profit can be extracted from the market by estimating the replacement cost of a newly constructed building which has recently sold. The difference between the sales price and the replacement cost of the property is the developer profit. Sales of properties in the Tampa Bay Area were analyzed. They indicated developer profits between 10% to 20%, with the more risky projects being near the higher figure. Based on~th3s-anafysis,a, . ..~ ~ ,, ., __ developer profit of 15% seems reasonable for the subject. ~~~~i i~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~} }] ~ L_.J OCT I7 2005 Tod Marr & Associates 25 08051345 PLANN9~~ D~~ART~lE(VT CITY QF CL~~RU-l~1T~R ~~ ~~~~~~~~~9~~ ucr ~. 7 zoos ~ R G G a ~~~ ~. PL.p-Nl~1ti~ ~EgA+R~MENT Site Improvements C~T~ ~F ~~~~S~~v9~1iER Site improvements include fencing, concrete walks and curbs, concrete block patio, asphalt paved parking area, signage and professional landscaping. The site improvements are maintained in average condition. The replacement cost of these items is estimated at $35,000. DEPRECIATION From the estimated replacement cost must be deducted the accrued depreciation due to all sources, including physical deterioration, functional and external obsolescence. Depreciation is a loss in property value from any cause. It may also be defined as the difference between the reproduction or replacement cost of the improvements and its market value. Deterioration, or physical depreciation, is evidence by wear and tear, decay, dry rot, cracks, infestations, or structural defects in a building. Other types of depreciation are caused by obsolescence, which maybe either functional or external. Functional obsolescence maybe caused by the inadequacy or superadequacy of a building's size, style, or mechanical equipment. Physical deterioration and functional obsolescence can usually be observed in an improvement. External obsolescence is caused by factors outside the property such as changed in demand, general property uses in the area, zoning, financing, and government regulations. (Source: The appraisal of Real Estate, 1992, 10 Edition, page 343) Physical Depreciation The physical depreciation has been estimated via the economic age-life method, in which the deprecation is a percentage of the effective age of the improvements compared to the estimated economic life. The formula for estimating depreciation is as follows: Effective Age/ Economic Life x Replacement Cost =Depreciation. The subject structures were built in 1950 with an actual age of 55 years. As discussed, the wall unit air conditioners have been updated, the roof covering was indicated to have been replaced roughly five years ago and the electric service has been updated. The property is owner managed and the property has been well maintained. No items of deferred maintenance were observed. The subject's effective age is estimated at roughly 20-25 years. Based on the Marshall Valuation Service, the subject would be classified as being an average to good cost development with an economic life of roughly 55 years. Functional Obsolescence This type of depreciation is the adverse effect on value resulting from defects in design. It can also be caused by changes that, over time, have made some aspect of a structure, material, or design obsolete by current standards. Based on our analysis, the subject is Tod Marr & Associates 26 08051345 o~;ei;'d;'si. similar to the other motel facilities in this market area with no functional obsolescence observed. External Obsolescence This type of depreciation is the result of diminished utility of a structure due to negative influences from outside the site. This type of depreciation is almost always incurable. An example of external obsolescence would be a garbage dump being located adjacent or within close proximity to the subject. Another example would be the local or general economy. As the local or national economy weakens, there could be a temporary reduction in rents, thus, reducing the market value of properties. Based on a survey of this market area, no external obsolescence was observed. Therefore, based on the analysis, the market value of the subject by the cost approach is estimated as follows: pGT 17 2005 PL~-f~6~I~G ~~I~~~~'~ViEfo1T CITY OF Cl~~~`I21~Ir~'~~4 Tod Marr & Associates 27 08051345 ORiG~fJAL SUMMARY OF THE COST APPROACH Structure: Gross Building Area Covered Entry Total Kitchen areas Total So$ Costs Impact Fees Subtotal Site Improvements Total Cost oflmprovements Developer Profit and Overhead Replacement Cost New Depreciation Physical Functional External Total Depreciation 5,484 sf 1,260 sf 10 units $% X $ 118.50 $ 649,854 X $ 3 5.00 $ 44,100 $ 693,954 X $2,800 $ 28,000 $ 721,954 $ 36,098 $ 20,000 10% E$echve Total 22.5 55 41% 0% 0% Depreciated Cost ofImprovements Plus Estimated Land Value lJ t1iL~~,v~~'.~1~ Total OCT 17 2005 Rounded To pLpNN~~1'~ D~~,~RT~ViENT CITY OF C~ ~~!~~l~1~`~~R $ 778,052 $ 35,000 $ 813,052 $ 894,357 $366,686 $0 $0 $366,686 $ 527,671 $ 780,000 $1,307,671 $1,310,000 Tod Marr & Associates 28 08051345 ORlG1Pv,~1L THE SALES COMPARISON APPROACH The sales comparison approach involves a detailed comparison of the subject property with similar properties which have recently sold in the same or competitive market. This approach is based primarily on the principle of substitution. This principle states, when several commodities or services with substantially. the same utility are available, the lower price attracts the greatest demand and widest distribution. In other words, a prudent investor/purchaser would not pay more to acquire a given property in the market, considering that an alternative property may be purchased for less. The five basic steps in this analysis are listed below: 1. Research the market to identify similar properties for which pertinent sales listings offerings and/or rental data is available. 2. Qualify the data as to terms, motivating forces, or bona fide nature. 3. Analyze the salient characteristics of the comparable properties in relation to the property being appraised, particularly those items relating to date of sale, location, physical characteristics, and condition of sale. 4. Consider all dissimilarities and the probable effect on the price of each sale and derive individual market value indications for the property being appraised. 5. Formulate an opinion of market value from the pattern developed from the foregoing analysis. A market investigation was conducted in the subject's area to find sales of properties comparable to the subject. The most recent pertinent found have been provided. OCT 17 2005 Pl.A(~NI~!O D~~~~TMENT CITY OF CLRiNr",i ~~ Tod Marr & Associates 29 080S134S oR~ ,ir~~~~_ IMPROVED COMPARABLE NO l: ' ~~ ~~ ~~ Gross Building Area/LJnit: 393 sf ~ r ~ -_, E Year Built: 1951 ~~~~~.~ ~ ~"~~~ Condition: Average to Good ~~.~ ~ ~ 2~~~ Quality: Average Land Size: 12,540 sf, or .288 acre, mol Density: 62.5 u.p.a. PLA~9N~~!~ D~~~~T~IENT Financin Cash to Seller C~~ Q~ ~~-~:~~i~r~~ Name: Cavalier Resort Motel Address: 64 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach Parcel Number: OS-29-15-54756-079-0020 Date of Sale: Apri12005 Grantor: Jozef & Renata Ostrowski Grantee: Bay Esplanade Properties, LLC O.R. Book/Page: 14266-509 Sale Price: $1,750,000 Number of Units: 18 units Gross Building Size: 7 067 sf g• Price Per Unit: $97,222 Price Per Square Foot: $247.63 Reference Number: 14320 ' Comments: This is the sale of a 30 unit motel building located on northern Clearwater Beach. Information pertaining to the sale was verified with the property manager and selling real estate agent. ' Tod Marr & Associates 30 08051345 aR,s~N~a~ II Name: Sunrise Resort " Address: 669 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater Beach Parcel Number: OS-29-15-54747-084-0090 Date of Sale: February 2005 Grantor: Amerpol Hotels and Motels, Inc. Grantee: Hedson, LLC O.R. Book/Page: 14140-1957 ~14~ ~ , <''~ ; Sale Price: $1,800,000 ~~ ~~.+~i ~,-_~~,,'l..J Number of Units: 30 units Gross Building Size: 7,578 sf CCT 17 1005 Gross Building Area/LTnit: 253 sf Year Built: 1947-1951 PLA~I~~ul"~ ~~~~~~I~E~T Condition: Average to Good C~~ QF ~,~~g'~;~9,j~~°~~~ Quality: Average Land Size: 12,257 sf or .281 acre, mol Density: 106.8 u.p.a. Financing: United Bank - $1,200,000 & PMM $200,000 Price Per Unit: $60,000 Price Per Square Foot: $237.53 Reference Number: 14322 Comments: This is the sale of a 30 unit motel building located on northern Clearwater Beach. It was purchased for continued use as a motel facility. The sale was verified with the grantee. The facility consists of a number of very small units and the grantee is planning to combine several of the units, which will reduced the total number of units but will increase the average size of the units. Tod Marr & Associates 31 08051345 IMPROVED COMPARABLE NO 2 __~ .-"" _ ___~"_ 1 I'' IMPROVED COMPARABLE NO 3: CP,IGINRL Name: Camelot Motel ' Address: 603 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater Beach, Pinellas County, Florida 33767 ' Parcel Number: OS-29-15-54792-001-0010 Date of Sale: October 2004 Grantor: Grantee: ' Eunice Hubbard _ Royal Camelot, LLC ]~, ~ ~ ~' ,~ a 364 ~~~~~:~ O.R. Book/Page: 13890- Sale Price: $1,400,000 Q~~ 1 ~ ZQ~~ ' Number of Units: 22 units Gross Building Size: 10,208 sf 4~p A, P~~~~~~ ~~r~~i~i iV~~1VT Gross Building Area/Unit: ' 464 sf C~~ ~F ~~~~~~,~~'~~~ Year Built: 1950 Condition: Average Quality: Average ' Land Size: 8,755 sf, or .201 acre, mol Density: 109.5 u.p.a. Financing: Conventional Mortgage; Cornerstone Community ' Bank; $1,689,300 Price Per Unit: $63,636 '' Price Per Square Foot: $137.15 Comments: This is the sale of a 22 unit motel building located on northern Clearwater Beach. It was purchased for conversion to a condominium-hotel facility. The sale was ' verified with the grantee. Tod Marr & Associates 32 08051345 ~~~~ ~~ r~~~E without prior written consent of the applicant and the appraiser and in any event only in its entirety. 19. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media without the written consent and approval of the author, particularly as to the valuation conclusions, the identity of the appraiser or firm with which he/she is connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute, the MAI designation. 20. Certain data used in compiling this report was given to the appraiser from sources he considers reliable; however, he does not guarantee the correctness of such data, although as far as is reasonably possible the data has been checked and is believed to be correct. 21. The soil and the area of the subject appears to be firm and solid, unless otherwise stated. Subsidence in the area is unknown or uncommon but the appraiser does not warrant against this condition or occurrence. 22. Subsurface rights (mineral and oil) were not considered in making this report, unless otherwise stated. ' 23. Any riparian rights and/or littoral rights indicated by survey, map or plat are assumed to go with the property unless easements or deeds of record were found by the appraiser to the contrary. ' 24. The appraiser, by reason of this report, is not required to give testimony in court with reference to the property herein appraised nor is he obligated to appear before ' any governmental body, board or agent unless arrangements have been previously made thereof. ' 25. Neither our name nor report maybe used in connection with any financing plan which would be classified as a public offering under state or federal securities laws. UCT 17 ~0~~5 PI.ANt~![~G DEP~RT(I~ENT CITY QF C~.E~tRWHTER Tod Marr & Associates 43 08051345 1 ~~~ ~ ~ CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISAL The undersigned does hereby certify that, to the best of my lmowledge and belief: • The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. • The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. ' • We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. ' • Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, ~ the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. • Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, and the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute. Unless otherwise stated herein, the departure provision does not apply. • We have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. • No one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. • The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. • The value estimates in this report were not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or for the approval of a loan. This appraisal assignment was not ~ based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or approval of a loan. • As of the date of this report, Tod Marr, MAI, has completed the requirements of the continui g education program of the Appraisal Institute. ~ .-_~ ,,.~~ ~.,,~,~ ~J, ~ ~. _ ~, ~~ J ~ ~~~~~~~~ e ec 1 Submitted, ~ M 0(,T 1 r 2005 ~~~ -~ Tod Marr MAI CCIM Brian D. DeMuth PLAt~R~i~!~ D~P,~~TM~NT ' C1Slf Q~ C~.~,f ~~~N~'~sE~ St.-Cert. Gen. REA RZ1237 St.-Cert. Gen. REA RZ2473 (Exterior Inspection Only) II' . Tod Marr & Associates 44 08051345 t h ~ II ~ ADDENDUM r~ ~~ ~~ ~.~~ [! v~~C.a! I ~. , ucT i "~ 2C~~ PLAIVNI~'~ D~P~RT V~F~1T CITY OF C1F~~~~1l~TEE~ Qualifications of Appraiser Education: Brian D. DeMuth Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 1989 Bachelor of Science Degree; Major -Finance and Real Estate Professional Education: Florida State University: Real Estate Principals and Practices Real Estate Law Real Estate Appraisal I Real Estate Appraisal II Real Estate Finance Appraisal Institute: Real Estate Appraisals Principles Basic Valuation techniques Capitalization Theory & Techniques 1B-1 Capitalization Theory & Techniques 1B-2 Standards of Professional Practice, Part A Standards of Professional Practice, Part B USPAP Core Law FHA & The Appraisal Process Other Courses: Residential Construction Apartment Appraising Experience: Staff Appraiser; Tod Marr & Associates, Clearwater, Florida Commercial Appraiser (8/00 to Present) ~\ r+J. ~ , JJJl7 PVT 17 1005 PL.l~~~I~~C DF~~~C~'i~~Fi~T CI~1(OF C~ F~,~11-~ ~~FR Staff Appraiser; Biggins, Atkinson, Combs & Associates, Clearwater, Florida Commercial Appraiser (6/94 to 8/00) Staff Appraiser; AppraisalFirst, Inc., Clearwater, Florida Commercial & Residential Appraiser (6/89 to 6/94) License: State-certified general real estate appraiser RZ2473 ~ ,,~ ~~ ~~, ~_ QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISER TOD MARK, MAI, CCIM Education Florida State University, 1985, Tallahassee Florida, Bachelor of Science Degree in Finance and Real Estate. Minor in Accounting. Courses: Florida State University Real Estate and Its Legal Environment Real Estate Appraisal Real Estate Feasibility Analysis Real Estate Finance Real Estate Principles Real Estate Market Analysis Courses: American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers/Appraisal Institute lA-1 Real Estate Principles 2-1 Case Studies in Real Estate lA-2 Basic Valuation 2-2 Valuation Analysis/Report 1B-1 Capitalization Theory and Techniques 4 Litigation 1B-2 Capitalization Theory and Techniques SPP Standards Part A, B, & C 520 Highest and Best Use & Market Analysis 710 Condemnation Appraising Courses: Commercial Investment Real Estate Institute CI-101 Financial Analysis for Commercial Investment Real Estate CI-201 Market Analysis for Commercial Investment Real Estate CI-301 Decision Analysis for Commercial Investment Real Estate Seminars: Understanding Limited Appraisals Appraisal Review-Income Properties Persuasive Style Report Writing The Appraiser's Legal Liability Rates, Ratios & Reasonableness Valuation of a Less than Fee Acquisition & Sales Comparison App. in Litigation Appraising Rural Properties USPAP-Core Law Accrued Depreciation Construction Cost Estimating Sales Comparison Approach Understanding Wetlands for Appraisal Purposes & Mitigation Banking as a Highest & Best Use SFWMD Appraisal Seminar ~~J{~ ~~~~~V .~~ u~ L' ~ ~ , ~~~ i 1 ~ X005 PL!'~IVld~lw.`~ D~:~P,~~lIU~~:~1T Professional Affiliations: Member of the Appraisal Institute, MAI Designation #9440 Member of the Commercial Investment Real Estate Institute, CCIM Designation #7465 Member Greater Clearwater Association of Realtors & Florida Gulfcoast Commercial Association ' Experience: Owner, Tod Marr & Associates, Clearwater, Florida 1/93 to present Staff Appraiser, Commercial Division, AppraisalFirst Inc. (1986-1993) Staff Appraiser, Southeastern Real Estate Appraisal Corp., St. Petersburg, Fl (85-86) ' Licenses: State-certified general appraiser #RZ1237 License Real Estate Broker, State of Florida The Appraisal Institute conducts a program of continuing education for designated members. Designated members who meet the minimum standards of this program are awarded periodic educational certification. Tod Marr, MAI, is currently certified under this program. Q Prepared for: ~~l~r~~~~~~r ` Tod Marr & Associates ~+ mrota~ 440 E Shore Dr ~a~ww.[nterilood.com • 1-800-252-6633 Clearwater Beach, FL 33767-2031 __ FLOODSCAPE Fbpd H2zards M8p Map Number 12103C0102G Effective Oate September 3, 2003 For more information about flood zones and flood insurance, contact: ~' ~ ~~ 12t1~~ Powered by FloodSouroe 577.77.FL000 www.floodsource.com © 1999-2005 SouroeProse and/or Flood Sauroe Cotporztions. FYI rights reserved. Patents 8,831,326 and 8,678,615. Other patens pending. For Info: info(~floodsouroe.com ~ ~~~ I~t~~~ .=~ ~ri---~ ~FI s~ ~.'~ 4 ~ t 2~~~ PI.A~~~i~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ ~~~~ ~t~T COTY ~~ ~~'~~=~~~j ~~-T~R er;;c~raa,~. e~ InterFlood , ~ ~br a as mom www.EnterFlood.corn • i-800-252-6633 Prepared for: Tod Marr & Associates 440 E Shore Dr Clearwater Beach, FL 33767-2031 n ~~ ~_. (~1' ( 1. ! i u~5 CITY QF C~~,"~.!~'~:~:c~;~ and B.B?8,815. Other patents bending. For Info: info@floodsoutce.com.