Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SAND KEY 1976-1977 SAND KEY REZONING CORRESPONDENCE
S~ d ~=~ SAND KEY 1976-1977 SAND KEY REZONING CORRESPONDENCE ~ ~ . LAW OFFICES RICHARDS, NODINE, GILKEY, FITE, MEYER & THOMPSON, P. A. RICHARDS BUILDING 1253 PARK STREET RALPH RICHARDS CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33516 WILLIAM E. NO DINE WILLIAM W, GILKEY - (813) 443-3261 JOHN D. FITE LARRY K. MEYER J. DEN NIS P. THOMPSON June 17 , 19 7 6 JOHN E. SLAUGHTE R,JR EMIL G. PRATESI J. MARVIN GUTH RIE R. CARLTON WARD DAVID E. PLATTE City Clerk City of Clearwater Clearwater, Florida Re: Proposed Rezoning of Sand Key Dear Sir: RECEIVED :IUN 17 1976 CITY CLEF. a ~? f` ` .~ U !~ This firm represents United States Steel Corporation, the owner and mortgagee of certain property on Sand Key which the City proposes to rezone. Our client opposes the application of the Planning Department for the rezoning of property owned by it or on which it holds a mortgage. We believe this proposed action is illegal. As the City's records will reflect, the major portion of Sand Key was formerly owned by the late Ed C. Wright, the predecessor in title to United States Steel Corporation. In exchange for valuable consideration, namely, settling a lawsuit involving annexation of Sand Key and donating right-of-way for a bridge approach to Sand Key, the City contracted with Mr. Wright to annex Sand Key and zone the property for "B" business use. Thereafter, relying upon that zoning, United States Steel Corporation purchased Sand Key from Mr. Wright's estate. The. above agreement was further affirmed by the City during its negotiations to purchase land it designated on the northern portion of Sand Key. In .addition, the rezoning, as proposed, could be classified as spot zoning in our opinion. Based upon the foregoing, you. are advised that United States Steel Corporation intends to take such steps as may be necessary to contest any rezoning of its property. ery truly yours, ~.J_s~__ ~~~~~ Dennis P. Thompson DPT/mlb CC: Mr. Frank E. Felix, Jr. City Attorney ~V- • • C I T Y O F C L E A R W A T E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33518 OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY January 5, 1977 First Federal Savings and Loan Association of .Largo 100 N. Clearwater Largo Road Largo, Florida 33540 Gentlemen: Re: Properties known as Clearwater Sand Key Club, Inc. , Number 1, a Condominium; 1370 Gulf Blvd. , a/k/a Gallery Restaurant, Metes and Bounds 1-5 (a restaurant); Metes and Bounds 1-9 (a tennis court)(Section 19-29-15) The zoning regulations for the above captioned properties provide for compliance with the following requirements as the property is located in CG Zone, as regulated under Code of Ordinances, Zoning Code of the City of Clearwater, Appendix A, Section 23. O1, et. seq. SETBACKS: 1. Setback from the water: 50 feet 2. Setback from the street: 15 feet 3. Setback on each side: 30 feet (as regulated under Section 30. 07, Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Zoning Code, because this is a waterfront lot) PARKING SPACES: 1. Condominium: 156 (1-1 / 2 per unit) 2. Restaurant• ?2 3. Tennis court: 4 These requirements are based on the number of units in the condominium, seating capacity and number of employees in the restaurant, and 40% of the possible number of tennis participants sir_ce the latter area is used in conjunction with an existing structure, to-wit, the condominium. "Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer" .~ ~`' First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo January 5, 1977 page two • The City has. received notice that the First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo, owner of the restaurant, intends to enter into the following transactions, and execute all necessary documents: A. The conveyance by First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo, to Sand Key Yacht and Tennis Club, Inc. , of all that tract or parcel of land being designated as Parcel "A" on that plat of survey prepared by Pimm Engineering Company, dated October 29, 1976, and last revised December 16, 1976 (survey) . B. The conveyance by Sand Key Yacht and Tennis Club, Inc. , to First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo, of all tract or parcels of land being designated as Parcel "B" on the survey. C. The granting by Sand Key Yacht and Tennis Club, Inc. , to First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo, of an easement for vehicular and pedestrian traffic over that tract or parcel of land being designated as Easement "E" on the survey. D. The granting by First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo, to Clearwater Sand Key Club, Inc. , Number 1, a Condominium, of an easement for pedestrian ingress and egress over that certain tract or parcel of land being designated as "Easement 'G"' on the survey. E. The recording of Quit-Claim Deeds from First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo, to Clearwater Sand Key Club, Inc. , Number 1, conveying any right, title or interest of First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo, in and to the following: (1) Grant of aNon-Exclusive Easement to Parking Spaces dated June 12, 1974, recorded in OR Book 4182, Page 1709, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; and (2) Ninety-Nine Year Parking Lease dated June 12, 1974, recorded in OR Book 4182, Page 1695, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. • First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo January 5, 1977 page three • li F. The execution and delivery of anon-exclusive parking lease by Guardian Mortgage Investors, as Lessor, to First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo, as Lessee, which lease shall have a minimum term of Ninety-Five (95) years, and provide for the lease of a minimum of twenty-one (21) parking spaces located on that certain tract or parcel of land being designated as Parcel "C-2" on the survey. The City will receive a certified survey which will indicate that there will be ?2 parking spaces available for use by the restaurant after completion of paving work, and there will be a setback on the southerly side of the restaurant equal to 29. 13 feet. Finding that there is inadequate space between the restaurant and condominium to permit the 30 foot setback that would be required if this were an individual parcel and originally developed as such, the City will accept the setback of 29. 13 feet as substantial compliance with the Code. The City will not consider this a violation of the Zoning Code. Upon completion of these transactions, as itemized above, it is the opinion of the City officials that the restaurant owned by First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo will be in compliance with the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clearwater, Appendix A, Zoning Code. The City of Clearwater makes this certification with the knowledge that: The restaurant has available to it 72 parking spaces, 21 of which are provided by the non-exclusive parking lease referred to in subparagraph "F" hereinabove. Very truly yours, ,~ Marybeth Lavallee Assistant City Attorney ML/km cc: Don Jas, Zoning Analyst Ed Blanton, Building Director Sid Snair, Zoning Enforcement Officer • July 7, 1977 . ~~~ 11 ~~7 ~?£P.4r~'FMEKF Mr. Warren D. Renando Plaaning Director City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33518 Dear iKr. Renando: REFERENCE: SAND KEY SSOPPES, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA As we discussed yesterday, this letter and the enclosed drawings (6 sets) are for the preliminary site plan review as required by your department. The plans for this project have already been reviewed by the following people within the planning, zoning, and building depart- ments of the City over the period of the last nineteen months, and are on file with most of these departments: Paul A. Bergmann, Jack Woole, Don Jass, Syd Snar, Jack Ballasar, George Buhmeyer, Bill Lewis, Reith Crawford, Terry Jennings, Patrick Tracy, and Ned Sall. All recommen- dations by these people. have been implemented and the project thus far is considered to be in compliance with all existing zoning and build- ing regulations. Your recommendation regarding the Community Impact Statement has been noted. Sowever, we would like to pursue this matter further with Mr. Schoemaker as to the necessity of this study. If the Impact Statement is required, it will be submitted upon completion with the drawings for the find Plan Review. If there are any questions regarding the preliminary Plan Review, please contact me. I. 4 .. Yours very truly, BARRY A. MacEWEN, A. I . A.._.~.~ JOSEPH C. SAFNER PROJECT ARCHITECT Copy to: irir. D. E. Simpson Project Engineer USS Realty Development 200 St. Andrews Drive Belleair, Florida 33516 ,HARRY ~~. MAC EWE?'-ARCYITECT 1408 SWANK AVENUE • TAMPA, FL~RfDA • / w 1 ~ • f Ju3y ~9, 1977 mac. D. H. Simpson Project Engineer tFSS 8salty ~lavsiopaseat 2Qfl St. dadssxs 13cive Ballmair, Florida 33515 iiesr irr. Sispsoa: The Planning Department has received your latttr of Daly 14, 3977, along vrith six (6J copies of the Preliminary Site Plan. Shest MP-1, dated July 11, for your Sand xey Shoppcs. Horaver, the City is uaabls to procass these pro- liminary pleas nntfl a Community Iapact 3tatea~ent is aGcordaace with Section 34.01 of the City Cade has bass subsisted and approved. Sfateroly, llnthany L. Slior.~sa3cer City ~tauager C ~ S ~~ t r •~ . • ~.-: uss USS Realty Development FRANK E. FELIX, JR. Division Of United Statas< Steel Corporation PROJECT MANAGER 200 ST. ANDREWS DRIVE BEtLEAIR, FLORIDA 33516 813/443-0831 July 14, 1977 Mr. Warzen D. Renando Planning Director City of Clearwater P. 0. Bog 4748 Clearwater, FL 33518 Re: Sand Rey Shoppes, Clearwater, Florida Submittal of Preliminary Site Plan Dear Mr. Renando: In accordance with Section 34.03, Site Plan Approval Procedures, Zoniag, City of Clearwater, Florida, we formally .submit six (6) copies of the prel~m~rary site plan, Sheet MP-I, dated July 11, 1977, for our Sand Rey Shoppes for review and approval by the Planning Department. This submittal is also made in conjunction with the requirements for issuance of a land use permit. If there are any questions regarding the preliminary site plan review, please contact this office. DES/sab Enclosures (6) Sincerely, ~~ . D. E. Simpson Project Engineer c'rF. ~ ":''. V~ D JUl 14 197 PLANNING DEPARTMENT . ~ ~, `• To: Mr. A. L. Shoemaker, City Manager FROM: W. D. Renando, Planning Director Y OF CLEARWATER i department Correspondence Sheet COPIES: Community Impact Statement - Sand Key Shoppe SUBJECT: July 19, 1977 DATE: Based on a review of the Plans of Sand Key Shoppes, its magnitude and location, it is atpparent that it is in excess of the $500,000 minimum and would require a Community Impact Statement. Please sign the attached letter and return to the Planning Department for processing. Thank you. WDR:ms ~.,.._. -.._....r- ,....~.,...,.-,. _... '~; A•I•A _ _ __ • r JUNE 2, 1977 T0: FILE 76-HM-121 , FROM: JOE HAFNER ,. SUBJ: SAND ;:EI' SHOPPES, CLEARWATER: ZONING REQUIREMENTS. SITE AREA: CG-GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ~ _ 81248.7 sq. ft. 416.66' (Gulf Blvd.) x 19.5.0' 20% of 416.66' a 83..33 ft. ` 30% of 416.66' _ _ •125.0 ft. 40% of 416.66' _ 166.66'ft. 30% of 195.0' _ 58.5 fit. 40% of .195.0' = 78. ~ f t. ~ ~s1 ~ i ~; ~. ~; ~ r ti ' M~xJMt•aM' ~iVIC.Dlb-!!~~ •~i . O ,~ ~ o , Pte. 2o-,a~+.J~ ~s7lo2r( QSJ- ~ t ~ ~{ 3 ~ ~ ,~, E~l ll t `~ 0 Building 5Etla:rck Requirements::. Clearwater Zoning Wide parcel classification: Front yard -per zone classification CG = 5.0' . Side yard - see diagram above Waterfront - 25.0' from Clearwater Harbor mean high tide ~' . { [-Ieoo.. ~1 1~~er- F~v.•c,,,_ Atir-ur~r-rrr I/1()f~_ C~Yra~.r~.i--Av~~.rrr~ l a~~na Ft;~Arn,a SITE AREA 81248.7 sq. ft. Landscaping Requirement (10% minimum) 8124.8 sq. ft. :'ar'•.. ing Area (maximum) Site Area-I:andscaping 73123183 sq. ft. Gross Leasable Area (Optimum) Maximum Parking /3 24374.61 sq. ft. GLA Building Area (Optimum) Based on Zoning Setbacks (includes allowances for corners) ~ 37624.0 sq. ft. SAND KEY SHOPP~S P^OJ~CT Site Area ~. 81248.7 sq. ft. Building Area 34857.b4 sq. ft. Landscaping Perimeter (12%) 9898.4 sq. ft. Interior Parking Areas-Zoning , (Requires 2000 sq. ft. for 150 cars) 2826.0 sq. f:t. Parking Area: Si::e Area - Landscaping 71350.3 sq. ft. Gross Leasable Area Parking /3 per shopping center requirements 23783.43 sq. ft. GLA Actual Gross Leasable Area 23424.4 sq. ft. Actual Parking Required 3 x GLA 70272.0 sq. ft. V • FRANK E. FELIX, JR. PROJECT MANAGER • uss USS ~ea~ty ®evefapment Division of United States Steei Corporation 200 ST. ANDREWS DRIVE BELLEAIR, FLORIDA 33516 813/443-0631 July 22, 1977 City of Clearwater Post Off ice Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33518 Attn: Mr. Anthony L. Shoemaker City Manager Re: Sand Key Shoppes Community Impact Study Dear Sir: __~ 1 ~-''..- e~. r ~ v: ~. ,.~; , ;~ :: '~ _ ' ~, RECEIVE'. JUL 27 is77 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Reference your letter of July 19, 1977 and our telephone conversa- tion of July 20, 1977 concerning our request for a Waiver of Com- munity Impact statement, we request a meeting be arranged with Mr. W. D. Renando at the earliest possible time to discuss the requirements of the Community Impact Statement as it relates to Section 34.01 of the City Code. We await your reply. Sincerely, _ DES/sab cc: F. E. Felix, Jr. C. F. Hegner A. Rychalski D. E. Simpson Project Engineer S ~R~ ~ ~~v ~~~ ~~ . '~'~ .r____.., ~,~ L ~ ` °" APPLICANT OR REP•ENTATIVE~ "MUST BE PRESEN BOTH HEARINGS ~" APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONIidG (File in triplicate at office of City Clerr. Attach 3 copies of plat to scale shoeing location and dimensions of subject property and 3 copies ofcertified survey. Proof of o~-rnership requirements attached hereto. Fee to be paid at time of filing of application.) DATE August 8, 1977 OWNER OR OWNERS NAME(S) See attached list ADDRESS PHONE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CIF ANY) Applicant - City of Clearwater ADDRESS - PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF~~REQUEST) M & B 1 Sec. 19-293-15E less property lying east of C.R. 208 (Gulf Blvd.) and less R.O.W. for C.R. 208; Sand~Ke~Condo South Beach I~ Fl. Bk. 20 P~35• M ~ B 1-' 'Sec. - . - 5E; ~aa~3 y on o '3~out -: Beac ~ P1 Bk. Pg. 3; Clear- water Sand Key Club Condo No. 1 P1. Bk. 19, P 21-32• M & B 1-9 Sec. - - ec. - ec.. - r our Light Towers Condo Pl. Bk. 18-Pg. I-13; P1. Bk. 21 Pg. 1-13; M & B 1-3 Seca 19-29S-15E and Sec. 20-29S-15E• M & B 5-S,.Sec 19-29S-15E~& Sec. 20=29S-15E; Landmark Towers Condo P~. Bk. 20 Paee 19-•~30~ GEi~iRAL L®CATION Sand Key - West of C.R. 208 (Gulf B1vd.Z PRESENT ZONING CG DESIRED ZONING RM-28 .~~R~.AGE : ( per gone rec~~,est(s ) ..5©N FOR REQUEST reflect current usag e. and to bri.~into compliance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. LIST ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED Planning Office only Date Recd. P E Z Case No. Item # Date Action Recom. Date Fwd. ~~r~t~~~~r~~~r~r~r~rt~~r~~r~t~~~~~t~~~~~~~e~t~*~~~~~~*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ •. Cler}c's Office only Recd . Coo to P ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ .y Date Advt. P ~ Z Date Comm. Da*_e ~ ~~ ' °""ArrLICANT •R RErRESENTATIVE MUST fE rRESEN T :NTH HEARINGS APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONI2IG (File in triplicate at office of City Clerr.. Attach 3 copies o_` plat to scale shocaing location and d'_r7ensions or subject property and 3 copies of•certified survey. Proof of oc•~nership requirements attached hereto. Fee to be paid at time of filing of application.) DATE August 8. 1977 OWNER OR OWNERS NAME(S) B• F. Powell et al ADDRESS Belleview Biltmose Hotel Co. pHONE Applicant - pity AUTHORIZED REPRESEYJTATIVE (IF ANY) ADDRESS PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF REQUEST) M ~ B 17 in Section ~0-293-15E; M & B 2 Section 19-293-1SE GENERAL LOCATION Saud Key West of C.R. 208 (Gulf Blvd.) adjacent to south city limits of Clearwater PRESENT ZONING CG DESIRED ZO~iING CTIr ACREAGE: (per zone request<s) REASON FOR REQUEST TO reflect current usage and recognize hotel - motel .~ recreational demands at the south end of Sand Key adjacent to similar uses in B®lleair,r LIST A,'3Y OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED Date Recd. P ~ Z Case No. Item ~ Date Action Recom. Date Fwd. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~~~~~~~~~~~~#~~~r~~~~~~~~~a~~3~ ~ Cler~C's Office only Recd . Copy to P ~ Z ~ ~ ~ /-~ _ 7 Date Advt. P ~ Z Date Comm. Date Planning Off ice only r, APPLICANT OR REPRESEAITATIVE MUST BE PRESENT P.T BOTH HEARINGS ~~`- APPLICATION FOR Ci3.•~YGE IN ZONING (File in triG l1Gat.e at OffiC° Of City Cler::. Attach 3 copies o_` pi3t to scale shccoing location and dimensions of subject property and 3 copies ofcertified survey. Proof of ocmership requirements attached hereto. Fee to be paid at brae of filing of application.) DATE August 8, I977 OWNER OR OWNERS NAME(S) See attached list ADDRESS PHONE AUTHORIZED REPRESEi1TATIVE (IF A,YY) Applicant - City of Clearwater ADDRESS PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF REQUEST) ~ & B 1 Sec. I9-29S-15E Iess property lying east of'C.R. 248 (Gulf Blwd.) and eos R.O.G. Yor C.R. 208; Sand Key Condo South Beach IZ PI. Hk. 20 Pg 35; M ~ B I-7 SfdC. l~-1y~-ibis; Cana t~q Gonao SOUth ~3eaC4 t Y~. ,$iZC. L4, Yg. tS.i; C:J.C'mr~ water Send Key Club Condo No. I Pl. Bk. 19, Pg. 2I-32; M & B I-9 Sec. Li$ht Towers Condo PI. Bk. 18 Pg. I-I3; PI. Bk. 21 Pg. ~.-13; M ~ B 1-3 Sec. I9-295-I5E and See. 2t~-29S-I5E• M ~ 8 5-5,.5ec 19-29S-15B ~ Sec. 20-29S-I5E; Landa~rk Towers Condo P~. Bk. 2© Page 19=30 GENERAL LOCATION Sand Key - West of C.Ft. 208 {Gulf Blvd.) PRESENT ZONING CG T~F.SIR~z'D ZONING ~"28 ~aCREAGE : ( per zofle request (s) _ SON ~'OR REQUEST To reflect curt®nt usage and to bring into compliance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. LIST ANY OTxER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED ~~~~~~r~~~:ray:~~~~~r:~~r~~~~~~~~e~~~~:~:~~r:~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~:~:~:~~:~:~~~~~~~~:~~~~~r~~~:~ Planning Off ice onl` Date Recd. P E Z Case No. Item r Date Action Recom. Date Fwd. • Clerk's Office only Recd. __ // (~ ~., Copy to P ~ Z ,T ~ ~ ~ -_~ • ~"~` (~ ~ Date Advt . P ~ Z Date Corua. Date " APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRES .T BOTH HEARINGS APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONIidG (File in triplicate at office of City Cler;:. Attach 3 codes of plat to scale showing location and dimensions of subject property and 3 copies of~ certified survey. Proof of oc•~nership requirerients attached hereto. Fee to be paid at time of filing of application.) ~.. DATE August 8, 1977 OWNER OR OWNERS NAMEtS) U.S. Steel and Sayside Gardens I, II, III and IV, Condominium Owners tSee Attached List) ADDRESS PHONE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) Applicant -~ City of Clearwater ADDRESS PHONE LEGAL DE~SC~RIRPT~OB gGulf B1vd~Y and R.A W. west O UU ` Township 29S, Range 155; Sand Key Conde OF REQUEST) M ~ B 1 leas that past for C.R. 20 n ec oA , Hayaide GardeAa II F1. Bk. 13, P~. Hk. w12~pg.~88; Band Key-Condo~BayaidelGardens III,-P1. Bk.~19vPg~14; 8k. 19, Pg. 16; M & B 5 Sec. 2®-29S-1SE and Sec. 17-29S-15E 1@sa the north 417' M.O.L. CSee attachment) GENERAL LOCATION East aide of County Road 208, Band Key PRESENT ZONING CG DESIRED ZONING RM-16 ACREAGE: (per zone request(s) REASON FOR REQUEST To reflect current usage and r®flect a continued pattern of medium density on the Bayside of Sand Rey. LIST ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED Planning Office only Date Recd. P.S Z Case No. Item ~ Date Action Recom. Date Fwd . Clerk's Office only. Recd . ~/~/~ ~ Copy to P ~ Z ~ ~ ht ~/ S~ ~ 7 Date Advt. P E Z Date Comm. Date ~,~ ~"`', APPLICANT OR REP 'SENTATIVE MUST BE PRE APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONI?dG ~~ (File in tr_clicate at office of City Clerk. Attach 3 conies o` plat to scale shcc~in.g location and dimensions or subject property and 3 copies ofcertified survEy. Proof of oc~~nership requirements attached hereto. Fee to be paid at time of filing of application.) DATE August 8, 1977 OWNER OR OWNERS NAME(S) William R. Cash et ux, 1500 N.W. 16th Ave. a nsv e, or a Sand Keg Assoc. Ltd. Partnership, 1160 Cuff Blvd., C1eas~ater Beach, F1.33515 ADDRESS PHONE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CIF ANY) Applicant - Citp ADDRESS PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF REQUEST) ~ & B 5-3, Sec. 17-29S-15E and Sec. 2flw293-15E, ~ & B ,a-1, S@c. 17-29S-15E GENERAL LOCATION Weat ©f C,R. 2flS (Gulf Blvd.) adjacent to park on the north end of Sand Keg PRESENT ZONING CG DESIRED ZONING ~T BOTH HEARINGS e~ ACREAGE: (per zone request(s) REASON FOR REQUEST To reflect current usage and planned tourist facilities at tha north end of Sand Keg. LIST ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED ~~ store Planning Office only Date Recd. P ~ Z Case No. Item ~ Date Action Recom. Date Fwd. ~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~~~~~r~r~~~~sr~~~r~~~e~t~~~st~~*~~~~~~~~~~~ Clerk's Office only Recd . ~ ~ ~ 8 ! ~ ~~ 7~ Copy to P ~ Z Date Advt. P ~ Z Date Comm. Date -----~' " APPLICANT OR REP SENTATIVE MUST BE PRESEN T BOTH HEARINGS APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONI?JG (File in triplicate at office of City Cler;:. Attach 3 copies of plat to scale shocoin.g location and dimensions of subject property and 3 copies ofcertified survey. ?roof of oc•~nership requirements attached hereto. Fee to be paid at time of filing of application.) L~ DATE August 8, 1977 OWNER OR OWNERS NAME(S) B. F. Powell et al and Guardian .Mortgage Investment Trust et.ai ADDRESS PHONE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) Applicant - City ADDRESS PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY CSUBJECT OF REQUEST) M & B 17-1, M & B 17-2, M & B 17-3 all in Section 30-29S-•15E; Isle of Sand Key Condo, I, P1. Bk. 19 Pg. 88; M & B 2-2 Sec. 19-29S-15E and Sec. 30-29S-15E; M & B 2-1, Sec. 19-29S-I5E ~• GENERAL LOCATION Sand Key :~:a~~'~ ~'of C . R. 208 add scent to the southern city limits. PRESENT ZONING CG DESIRED ZONING RM-28 t~CREAGE: Cper zone request(s) e. ..~.........~ BEASaN FOR REQUEST To reflect the current usage and bring into compliance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. LIST ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED ignature ~9lt~~l~r~:l~~4~h~t~l~~s~k:~~~t:r~s~~t~~l~e~~~tc~e:'~~~~t~3k~fi~cslt~e~~t~~~~'c?e?ek~~'t~~~r~~~:;s:~~~rsirs~~r~s~ Planning. Off ice only Date Recd. P E Z Case No. Item ~ Date Action Recom. Date Fwd. ~~~~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~ PY Cleric's Office only Recd. Co to P ~ Z c~~~'` ~~/~~` ~~~ Date Advt . P ~ Z Date Conan. Date • ~ Y OF CLEARWATER Interdepertment Correspondence Sheet To: City Manager's Office ~. REC.. IVED FROM: City Clerk's Office S£P 20 1917 coplES: planning Department ~'LANNING SUBJECT: Zoning Change Requests (5) Sand Key area ~~P~iRTMENT ~nTE: August 24,' 1977 The attached applications are for acceptance by the Commission at the September 1st meeting. RGW:k ~. \ ~W 1' L ~ ` 'r1 \`" J e4 . ~ ~~ ~``]~~' `'- '! . 5E~'s a • T /~ ~~ ~~ v / z 0 AL .\ r~N~IS ~- COURTS 1 0 AL V_ ~ / ~ 'GS'•Y' ...~,.• .;a...', ;.,:.1' ?~~.;:y:~ ~.'' n.-'~`.•.. µ,:' S ! =~ ~ .. d;Y~:;.~t.~t;` s.CfiSc. r.:.>'t s a ~,,.:. .~~•• .. _: :k..::.. v w :~ .. ~< '~~k..~ d Abr . ~h:>` .~~~... ~._~~ a. ~~' ~'~ia~ ~ ` v v~~ ~ U. Y '`~ry~r6.. ..ti 9 G q 2 f ~ ryi{ r.- ..-. ~ H 0 ~~~. •~ ~~; . e =, i= °i I - < ~• ,. W ' 3 T 9 ~„ o WI ,, i a ~~ ~ ` j Y /~ =. ,,5~~.1 AL C~~ \ • / UNDER C~?NST. (3.83 ~CRES M~~~ ~, -- ~3•°el A~.-~C.S MOL~ 0 3 p '4,73 ~ C~'C"S N10L} ,~ ~.~=.32 AGES MQL.) ~• (J:O$ AC~'E5 MOL~--SOUND ;~~Y CLG! ~3 --_ 2.13 AG'RES ~N?GC~ ._.--- (2.4 2 ACRE 5 ~i0[) _ ~AL = _ ~~ f4~ O 200' 400' • (l. 36 -ACRES-.~~0[_) . -. - _ - - { ~ --5C/~ Z E --- •-~-(2.67 ACRES` N~O~) r~ (J8.?~~ACRES t41aG~ j i Y ,;,~ ~ AL SEGi3o ,~.1 ~~. -~ 5 v B1E.TM^ `O'P?G ,'~T,•+ 9~e °~a"°~ I 1 :~ ~aNA I KZ'~ `~ e1 ccu8 - ~ ~ Q - d V J ~~ AL v iYi J ~~ .. V PROPERTY: OFF ATT,4 CND AIVNEx~AT1oN a ZONING i REZONING PU81.1C HEARING ITEM N0. ~- AGENDA No. DATE5~ PLANNING BOARD ocT, ~$J i~71 CITY COMMISSION ~ ~l~V, 3, (~7? I.EGENO V =Vac~rt pky =Parking • Single Family L°J= Business ,~,, ® Duplex (~ =Multi-Family (~ C3UlL DlNC~ L1~IDER COIV 57: _ Scale Refer Atlas Page T-,1-;~- 3 - = 200 Sec.i'1,~9,2~Twp. 29 Rge. - S' ~ ~I _ Owner/Applicant: s~E A ~ ~ ac~t~.~ ~ N ~ a, From: C N ~ J•3 ~o • z ca 200 LEGEND V =Vacant Pkg =Pnrkinq PROPERTY: 0 Single Family. 8~= Business _ ~SFE ATTACH-117 Duplex ®=Multi-Family tiUILDINI~ UoVDER CONST.__- Scale - Refer Atlas Page K - ~ = 200° Sec.tq~3oTwp. 29 Rge. I S ~ ANNEXATION & ZONING / REZONING ~~°.. . Owner/Applicant: StE ~TTA~NtT~ PUELIC HEARING ITEM N0. - ~ -- -- - --.. _ ~ ~ From: C G - -, AGENDA No. DATES {°~ To: RM' 28 PLANNING 80ARD pC~,i&AI~~i~ CITY COMMISSION NEV. 3, 177 ~. ... { ~ ~,~ S~`~ 4 ~' A L :~~. l7uDER CORlST ~r V __. .. .. - o -.. ~ ~ - ~,~~03~1CRFS MOL~ . ` m -, .. 3 ~~41 AC~CS ~rac.) (3.04ACn''ES.~~c~~~:..._ _ =2.98 /~ CRES MOC~ s~ ~ti R ~n~irur_ ~ o~~nR~~~~r_ ~ AL ~2.~8 ACRL-S P~AG~ -- 13.9 3 /~ C~~ S I~~10 Lit ~ _ .. _ =- LEGEtVD d =Vnc~rt P,kb -Parklnq ® Single Family B~= Business Duplex j~ =Multi-Family Scale Refer ,Atlas Page I-J-K3 = 200 Sec.~'in Twp. 2~ Rge. ~ 5 Owner/App lican#: SIrE ~ ~ ~T~} ~N ~!7 ~ c From: C ~ N~ AL :~~; ~..3 ¢ ACRES.. ~%JOL~ -- • • - -_- l3ELLFV/CW_ - - I~.1 ~?. ~4f'E --- -~'Al3Alu~4 ~ CCU6 ~3.3DACRE'S l`l~ ~~~- - _ . 0 2oQ° 400` S CA.L E-- . _ __ ; LEGEND V =Vocont Pkg =Parking PROPERTY: E~ ~~~ ~ Single Fatuity B~= Business SFE_ AT~ACNFD Duplex i~ = Mulii-Fomily ~f Z3UltDlN~a u~roER co~S1; - ., ~ Scale Refer Atlas Page K-3 _ . _ __ __ _ _ ~ „ = 200' Sec. ~q~3oTwp. 29 Rge. 15 ~ ANNEXATION & ZONING / REZONING . ;e- Owner/Applicant: sEE ~p,-r'-rAC~~D ; PUBLIC HEARING ITEM N0. ~ ~--'"~-'- ~ a From: C ~ ---------~---- -AGENDA No. DATES . o m T0~ GY ~ -28 PLANNING BOARD QCT,IB,fcl77 N ~ CITY COMMISSION Nit/, 3, I°~~ ~~ ~ . r~ n Z _}. w ~~' ` ,e ° ", i \0.29 \4 J~ ;```o MM. ~I SG~• ~~ i \°~' SSG, ~ ~ ~ .. - ~ _ -::-VACANT /ao< - ~ ,. _ ~~ p o .~ .. - ~ - -° a o ~ _ : .~ \ ~ . Q ~ p-. ~ .ZS,. - QCZO 4•~ - .~ .. J - ~ . ~ ------ - ~ ~O ~ ti _•„a o 2 - .. O 200 ~. • LEGEND V =Vacant Pkg =Parktnq PROPERTY: 0 Single Family ., B~= Business ', ~ Duplex ~ [~ =Multi-Family SF~ A7I ACfaFD Scale - Refer Atlas Pa e 9 N-3 ~=.3 = 200 Sec. +~#ZoTwp. 2y Rge. i 5- .~ ANNEXATION & ZONING /..REZONING ~.-~ , . Owner/Applicant: SEE 1~\'CT F~c-~1~~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING lTEteA N0. ~~~-- - ~~'---- ~ ~ From: G G ~ --_-- ----_---~. ~_ AGENDA No. --~DATE~ o ~ To: G ~° ~: -28 PLANNING BOARD Oc7.i8,19 N ~ ~ CITY ~ COMMISSION ~1l0~./,~ S, 1~3~~ r----- ____.w_____.____~_ a :. ,'f ! ;~ ~' ~ r'° a a a ,~:~ ~.„ ~- "~ l .. ~. - . 'o. ~ ~;~ a ... ~./ ~:~ ~a3 .7 ~L _~ ~~..~., ,_ -~ ~M ~ .. - ~~: ,_ ~~. ® / rl.. ~:«: - ./.!. v_ - P! e 3 6 X '' 'O W ~:li>: • ;~'!"° ~ ~ ~~~~:: k = ,__. ;. ~ y ~ti-: ~ jtit . _. xa oQ ~, L ~ :~: ~:~;; }.; '. ~ CG AL _'! ~~ a~ ,. :`;:~~. // ~. 0 i 0 v AL ,`. o . r - LEC,E~~ ITEM I ~~<"~ :~~. ~~ n..:. :~ .~::,:::r:.~.. 1 ~ ITEM 2 ~%~:,/~!YlMIY:Z~I.1'~ LTE M 3 ~~~~~.~~\ ITEM 4 ~' ~~~ .1;--.~.__~1, AL ~1 F- V a 1 ~ ~ ~ Z ~ {`- Z N W ~- c ~` ~ ~ M; p L~ O O ~ ~ C9 Z Z -' ~ Z W O F-- ~ Z a w ~~ a o ~ z ~ Z Z Q o = a X U O m ~ z Z o ~ Z m Z ~ Q J } ~ Q ~.. d U J AL ~''/""~ ~ ~ tU _~ ~~ ~ ~ E Z ~ m ~ v n ~ ~ ~ - a a ' ' ~ 3 ;iy U ,~ m ~ v F- ~a ~~ " "- ~ ~ o0 a D ~ Q ~ ~ c~1 L ~n ~ a ~~ ~ «. ~" ~ v U a~ ~ c _ u - e 'E ~ Q L m o v: n C ~ o = to ~.~-~ s 03 ~ ~ p c 2 N p 11' ~sanbaa c~ w ®~ 6uiuoZ J USS Realty Development Division of United States Steel Corporation Sand Key Shoppes Community Impact Statement ~ii01L.L1ANCS S WAL'KE~ A~C~lT'ECTS Ca-1ARTE~tE® r L A N N E R 5 • D E S I G N E R S • CONSTRUCTION M n N A G E R 5 MEMBER 5 O F THE A M E R I C A N I N S T I T U T E O F ARCH I T E C T S 1 445 COURT STREET CL EA R WA•TE R. FLORIDA 335 1 4 UONALD S WILLIAMS. w i A • EDWARD H. WALKER. Jw., w i w • JAY F. 'MYERS w i w • ALEx PLISKO Ja ~ ~ • Community Impact Statement Sand Key Shoppes for USS Realty Development September 9, 1977 Copyright 1977 All Rights Reserved 1 ' WILLIANiS S. WALKER ARCHITECTS CHARTERE® P L A N N E R S • D E S I G N E R S • C O N S T R U C T I O N M A N A G E R S MEMBER S O F T H E A M E R I C A N I N S T I T U T E O F A R C H I T E C T S 1 4 4 5 C OUR T S TREE T C L E A R W A T E R F L O R I D A 3 3 5 1 6 ' Seotember 16, 19.77 i, ',' Mr. Edw i n B I anton Director Building Department City of Clearwater I~~, Re: Sand Key Shoppes Clearwater, Florida I11 Dear Mr. Blanton: This impact statement is submitted in fulfillment of Zoning Code Article XXXIV Development Requirements and Procedures. We trust that you will find the project impact on the com- munity is of a positive nature. Please ask for further information that you may require. Very tru I y yours, WI LLIAMS & WALK R ARCHIT S CHARTERED Edward H. Wal ker, F.A.I .A. ' EHW:nrp s DONALD S. WILLIAMS. F.A.I.A. EDWARD H. WALKER. JR.. A.I.A. JAY F. MYERS. A.I.A. ALEX PLISKO. Ja.. A.I.A. WILLIAM A. OTT. Ja.. A.I.A. TABLE OF CONTENTS Subject Page TITLE PAGE 1 COVER LETTER I I CONTENTS III (1-~) SCOPE. . I V LEGAL DESCRIPTION a LOCATION AND ACCESS b TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE. . c ADJACENT LAND USE. . , d SITE LAND USE. . e VEGETATION . f SOILS . g SANITARY SEWERS. , h REFUSE COLLECTION. . . i AIR AND NOISE POLLUTION . , j WATER REQUIREMENTS k PARKS AND RECREATION I FIRE PREVENTION m POLICE PROTECTION. n DEMOGRAPHICS o TAX EFFECT p TRAFFIC AND PARKING. q MAPS, ILLUSTRATIONS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS r VIEW INTERFERENCE . . s HOUSING. . t ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SIGNIFI CANCE u WILDLIFE `. v III (1) Subject SHADOW EFFECT . FINANCIAL INTEREST. . TRAFFIC CONTROL . COMPATIBILITY HEALTH SERVICES MASS TRANSIT . ECOLOGY . NON LOCAL COORDINATION . LIBRARY . MARKET ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING . SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA . . Page w x Y z as bb cc dd ee ff 99 hh III (2) PROJECT SCOPE Sand Key Shops is designed as a'center for specialty shops intended to fulfill a need currently unmet in the Greater Clearwater Area. This type of shopping center is successfully servicing the discriminating customer on St. Armonds Key - Sarasota, Florida and Palm Beach, Florida. The owner intends to attract the finest stores to Sand Key, catering to the affluent residents and tourists of upper Pinellas County, the Gulf beaches, Tampa and St. Petersburg. The project will be constructed in four 24,000 sq.ft, phases, commencing in 1977 with the last phase scheduled for completion in 1982. The building design and site development will enhance the neighborhood with crisp styling and preservation and enhancement of the existing foliage and landscaping. PROJECT SCOPE IV LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of land in Section 17 and 20, Township 29 South Range 15 East, Pinellas.County,..Florida.--and being further_de-scribed as ; follows: Beginning at a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of Gulf Boulevard, State Road No. 699 a 100 foot Right of Way said point being at the intersection of said Right of Way line with the line between Sections 19 & 20 and being North l~ 44'32" West, 4,182.26 feet from the Southeast corner of said Section 19, which point is also the Southwest corner of Section 20; thence North 42°13'31" East, 426.71 feet along said Right of Way line to 1/2 inch iron rod for a point of beginning;from said pol.nt of beginning continue North 42°13'31" East 1,309.39 feet along said Right of Way to a 1/2 inch iron pipe; thence run South 47°46'29" East 195.18 feet to an 'X' cut on the concrete sea wall; thence continuing South 47°46'29" East to the waters of Clearwater Harbor to a point hereinafter known as point 'A'for convenience: thence returning to the point of beginning run South 47°46'29" East 195.10 feet to an 'X' cut on the sea wall: thence continuing South 47°46'29" East to the waters of Clearwater Harbor; thence along said waters and winding, therewith in a Northerly direction to the aforementioned point A containing 6.0 acres more or less-Phase Two Together with: A portion of land in Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida and being further described as follows: beginning at a point on the Easterly Right of Way line of Gulf Boulevard, State Road No. 699 a 100 foot Right of Way said point being at the intersection of said Right of Way line with the line between Sections 19 and 20 and being North 1°44'32" West 4,182.26 feet from the Southeast corner of said Section 19 which point is also the Southwest corner of Section 20: thence North 42°13'31" East 1,736.10 feet along said Right of Way line to a 1/2 inch iron pipe for a point of beginning; froms aid point of beginning continue North 42°13'31" East 416.67 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod; thence run South 47° 46'29" East 195.07 feet to an 'X' cut in the sea wall; thence continuing South 47°46'29" East, to the waters of Clearwater Harbor to a point hereinafter known as point 'B' for convenience; thence returning to the point of beginning run South 47°46'29" East 195.18 feet to an 'X' cut on the sea wall; thence continuing South 47`46'29" East to the waters of Clearwater Harbor; thence along said waters and winding therewith in a northeasterly direction to aforementioned point 'B'. containing 1.9 acres more or less-Phase One Information taken from survey by Greiner Engineering Sciences Inc. Tampa, Fla. June 24, 1977 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (a) LOCATION AND ACCESS Property is approximately 6.0 acres on Sand Key lying.- between Gulf Boulevard and Clearwater Harbor. The water frontage on the harbor is approximately 1309 ft. which is sea walled. Access is from Gulf Boulevard connecting north to Clearwater Beach across Clearwater Pass bridge, to the south Gulf beaches and to the Belleair communities across Belleair causeway and bridge. Docks will be provided for marine shoppers traveling the inland waterways. LOCATION AND ACCESS (b) TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE The .property rises from seawall cap elevation of 5.6 ft. to a maximum elevation at Gulf Boulevard of 6.44 ft. The entire property lies below the 100 year flood plain elevation of 13 ft. It is planned the entire occupied shopping level will be an elevation of 13.67 ft. The natural water course is across the property from Gulf Boulevard to the harbor with water in excess of percolation sheeting over the seawall. It is proposed that 200 of the land surface will permit percolation with remainder sheeting over the sea wall or collected at three of the catch basins thru 18" Dia. culvert to the harbor. Soil test borings indicate a water table averaging 4'8" below existing grade. TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE ( c) ADJACENT LAND USE To the west, on the sea side of Gulf Blvd. Landmark hi-rise condominium, vacant property (650 ft,) and Sheraton Resort Hotel. To the south, Bayside Gardens-condominium apartments, developed by U .S .S . To the north, Pinellas County parkland (formerly City of Clear- water). ADJACENT LAND USE (d) 4 ADJACENT LAND USE To the west, on the sea side of Gulf Blvd. Landmark hi-rise condominium, vacant P"^^°r+., tFSn ft_1 anti Sheraton Resort Hotel. To the south, Baysid~ by U.S.S. To the north, Pinell~ water) . ., . SITE LAND USE Site land use is currently vacant. SITE LAND USE (e) VEGETATION The following information was compiled during a_site inspec-. tion on September 9, 1977. The site is dominated by Australian Pine (Casuarina equiset- folia). This species comprises the overstory and provides an approximate 98% canopy cover. Some Brazilian Pepper trees exist in the understory. Some native grasses also occupy a narrow strip of land between the seawall and the stand of pines. The average diameter of the trees found on site is 8.4 inches. The trees appear to be in excellent health and numerous stems are found in the open areas. Of the 479 trees located on site, approximately 389 will be removed due to construction activities. The loss of these trees will have some impact on the area. The aesthetic character of the site will be improved by the landscaping activities that will follow construction. The value of a single Australian Pine in the landscape is, at best, minimal. One hesitates to apply the International Society of Arboriculture's evaluation formula to such a species. Mr. Ric Becton Forester VEGETATION (f) SOILS 3 The. report of the Florida State Soil Conservation Service, Pinellas County Map #10 (see last page and Table #3), establishes the site soil as (Ma) - Made Land. Made Land (M a) consists of mixed sand,. clay, hard rock, shells, and shell fragments that have been transported, reworked, and leveled by earth-moving equipment. Many areas consist of material that has been dredged from the bay and used to fill diked areas. Coarser sludge materials are deposited near the outlet of discharge pipes and finer materials settle in more distant positions. Rocks 2 inch to 12 inches in diameter are common. Numerous silicified-oyster shells and some animal fossils occur in these materials. Stratification is appar- ent in the water-transported material. Materials. transported by truck are similar but they usually are sandier and do not contain silicified shells and fossils. Made land is underlain at a depth kinds of material. In some areas sandy bay bottom and in others by of fibrous peat 20 inches or less transported by truck has been dep consisting of chunks of concrete, broken asphalt. of 2 to 8 feet by various it is underlain by the Tidal swamp that has layers thick. Some of the material sited over solid rubble discarded appliances, and Made land occurs mainly in urban areas, along the coast and keys, and as manmade islands built in shallow water. In SOILS (g-1) ' coastal areas it has been built up to provide desirable locations for residential development. Recently deposited material shows very little profile development and has ' severe limitations for plants. Topsoil, irrigation, and special fertilizers are needed for good growth of lawns and ' ornamental plants. S01 LS ( g-2) ' ~~'`` C C i // ~rC zss.~. ~ II V w '---~ TE ~ ! d r _ a ~ _:f Ab o '~ ~I ~ m ~~ ~ '~ ~ " / %1 i 11 /. r, ,• p i - ' t< C // Y+ \ ~. A4 ~ i 3 J, , _` ~- ----_ a _ ~ ' n r ~ /~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~~ ~iisJ ~ ( _` n iT iI`~ ~'`~.1 ~ ,! p ;~ A~C~~_~-----_----_._---a n -; _- -.~-- _ lip ~,~. _ -~ I S[ABOAgp v R ,~~~ n ~ OOAST II T r. ~o , R ~~~ 1-~. - ~~ - ~ ~ ~~~ ~i ~_ ~ ~>, • ~ _~1 "'-~~~~~ "CA90Ag0 ~~ COA T ~~ IrNE II t `~ ~ f~ C C - =-~.~_ ~~.__T_.-- ~~ (Joim rMN i l) T. Z9 S. -. • P I NE LLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA N0. 10 ~ SOIL CLASSIFICATION 9, c3~ SANITARY SEWERS Shown on survey 8 dia. main installed about 1972 with (4) 8" dia. taps, located near 1/4 points along Gulf Blvd. for the length of the property. QUANTITY OF SEWAGE Shop toilets - 11,400 gallons/day Commericial kitchens(s)- 600 gallons/day QUALITY OF SEWAGE 95°Ja norms I human waste 5% commercial kitchen Treatment will be at the Marshall Street Plant (full tiercercery) SANITARY SEWERS (h) REFUSE COLLECTION The proposed shop complex will be serviced by existing city dumpster collections provided by current schedule of pick up three (3) times a week. Service six (6) days a week is presently available to Sand Key, should the final completed project (All Phases) require additional pick up. The waste material should be 80~o paper - large paper and office material with light commercial kitchen waste. ESTIMATED CAPACITY REQUIRED (CUMULATIVE TOTALS AT END OF EACH PHASE) PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III PHASE IV Yards per week S 10 15 20 Yards per year 260 520 780 1040 Tons per year 6.5 13.0 18.5 26 ADDITIONAL SPECIAL EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER NOT REQUIRED (Based on discussion with Robert Marshall of Sanitation, City of Clearwater, August 30, 1977) REFUSE COLLECTION (i) a AIR AND NOISE POLLUTION NOISE POLLUTION - maximum anticipated during construction will be from pile driving (if required) for a span of two to three weeks, 80 db. duration two to three seconds. Additional noise levels of up to 65 db. from crane opera- tion of duration of 60 to 90 seconds, and men shouting 65 db. sustained 10 to 15 seconds. Construction noise exceed- ing 55 db, will cease between 6:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. in accordance with county ordinance 74-11, baffling will be used as necessary to reduce levels to code requirements. Air pollution will be limited to on site vehicle and crane operation and dust generated from excavated and scalped areas. The excavated areas will be kept to a minimum, and during dry periods wetted to keep dust down. Building noise at occupancy will be normal exhaust fans 25 to 35 db., air conditioning 25 to 35 db., (largely vertical discharge) and vehicle noises 35 to 65 db. Common noise levels 35 db. automobile, T.V. sound 75 db. trains and trucks 80 db. thresho I d of pa i n 100 db. (sustained) damage to hearing Pinellas County noise ordinance 74-11 55 db. maximum 6:00 P.M. to 7:00 R.M. during construction 60 db. A/C or ventilation equipment. ' AIR POLLUTION - contributed by vehicles will be approximately one third of all that generated on Gulf Blvd. based on traffic ' estimates and all energy requirements will be met by electricity. There will be no incinerator. A I R AND NOISE POLLUT I ON ( j) WATER Existing Water - 12" main West side of Gulf Boulevard Gas - Line not existing Projected Requirements 100 people/Bldg, x 4 Bldg. = 400 people total 400 people x 30 gallons/person/day = 12,000 GPD total Each phase will require (4 phases total) (1) 12" dia. water service with 1" water meter Irrigation Planting areas shall be irrigated from a separate 14" main and 1" water meter, for each phase. WATER ( k) PARKS AND RECREATION Not Applicable PARKS AND RECREATION (L. ) FIRE PREVENTION FIRE PREVENTION COMPLIANCE - will be checked for by City , Fire Marshal for compliance with city code, Southern Standard Code and N.F.P.A., Life Safety Code and will be . further certified by architect as to compliance. The building will be fully sprinkled, full alarm system with ADT tie to the Fire Station and in-house security staff trained in emergency fire response. SITE ACCESSABILITY - equipment access to site via Mandalay Road and Gulfview Boulevard across Clearwater Pass Bridge. On site accessibility will be included in architect's plans after conference coordination with Fire Marshal, including ~. ~I Siamese connection. FIRE SERVICE INCREASE - Beach fire station #2 facilities manpower and equipment adequate to handle existing and known new Sand Key structures. City long range planning includes a new fire station to serve Sand Key. I The commercial occupancy low rise construction methods, Fire... '~ Spr i nk I er~ Systems, ADT A I arm System and ow~~e;~s security staff will reduce the normal demand on the fire department and, therefore, not require additional fire personnel. City of Clearwater Fire Chief Pitts Intervicew; September 9, 1977 FIRE PREVENTION (m) POLICE PROTECTION 7NE PROPOSED shopping complex is located in Police Zone Two which is Sand Key and South End of Clearwater Beach, and is currently served by a ~4 hour manned vehicle patrol. The proposed facility will not require supplementing city wide (on duty and off duty) police protection for Phase. I, because; I. Established zone with adequate coverage. 2. Around the clock in house private security staff. 3. Facility located in confined area on through boulevard with no intermediate streets and principally accessible by toll bridge. 4. Customer traffic rate of increase of one third above existing will occur principally during non-peak hours anticipated between II:00 A.M. and 3:CJ P.M., which will not cause appreciable increase in control problems or accident incident. Under completion of Phase II, an additional one patrol must be added during daylight hours, Phase III another additional patrol and Phase IV a total of three (3) daylight hour patrols must be added to the current zone. City of Clearwater Police Major William McClamma Ini;erview: September 9, 1977 POLICE PROTECTION (n) II DEMOGRA PH I CS 1979 1980 1981 1984_ Estimated Occupancy (Daily) Phase I Phase II Phase II I Phase IV Shoppers - Maximum 884 1886 3077 ~ 4719 Minimum 459 980 1598 2450 Average 571 1218 1988 3048 Employees- Maximum 137 295 478 .237 Minimum 70 153 248 511 Average 89 191 309 476 DEMOGRAPHICS (o) TAX EFFECT Municipal Economics Cost Benefit Expense Revenue The proposed project is expected to influence municipal econ- omics in a positive way. Initial impact fees and building permit 1978 1979 1980 1981 Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV -Sewer @ $475 per fixture 11875 11875 11875 II Impact @ 10¢ sq.ft. 2400 2400 2400 2400 Building permit 1082 .1190 1314 1457 TOT. INITIAL CONT. TO CITY 15357 15465 15589 15732 Continuing fees and taxes#yr. 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 f983 1984 Ut i I i ty @ 10~/a City water, sewer, refuse 50 •267 570 926 1282 1371 1425 Telephone 70 119 254 412 571 611 635 Power 150 1485 3168 5148 1'32 7E 24 7925 Real Estate (advalorem) -0- 7700 16426 26693 36959 39533 41093 Personal Property -0- Inventory -0- 2836 6050 9832 13612 14560 15135 Fixtures & Equip. -0- 1215 2455 3751 4885 5857 6667 TOTAL CONTINUING INCOME 270. 13622 28923 46762 64441 69556 74305 #Based on current city tax rates. ##Franchise, interfund transfer, fines, revenue sharing and forfeitures income not applicable since project does not affect permanent population. Sewer and water costs vs. income results in a interfund transfer included as income to the general operating fund, which has not been computed as income to the city. TAX EFFECT (p-I) 1 INCREASED COST OF SERVICES ' ' Capital Outlay - Impact 1978 1979 1_980 19 ~~ 1982 Police -0- -0- 3000 10850 10850 ' Fire -0- -0- -0- 27376 -0- Street Lighting -0- -0- -0- 1 -0- -0--. ' Traffic Signals -0- -0- -0- 20000 -0- Building -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- ' Parks & Recreation -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Public Works -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Housing & Redevel. -0- -0_ _p_ _0_ -0_ Library -0- -0- -0- --- -0- -0- TOTAL ' -0- -0- 3000 582261 10850 Annual Operating ~- 1978 1979 1980 1981 .~,. 1982 1983 1984 Po I i ce ' -0- 2900 6200 13200 21090 224:0 ?:'`: 00 Fire -0~ -0- -0- -0- 8160 8980 9880 Street Lighting ' -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- _0_ Traffic Signals -0- -0- -0- -0- 3000 3200 ;,'470 Building Dept. ' IS000 15900 17100 18300 -0- -0- -0- parks & Recreation -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- hublic Works 450 980 1600 2200 2360 2470 2540 ~~ousing & Redeyel. -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Library -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- ' N~o'ndepartmental 23~, 3550 4550 5730 7730 7960 8530 9150 ~•im i n. & Lega I 140 2660 3400 4290 5800 5960 6360 68'0 -UTA L CONT. EXPENSE .21660 27730 34920 47250 48540 52020 X5790 `~UMMARY ' Jet Revenue Over Costs Capital-Impact 15357 15465 12589 ( 42494) (10850) -0- -0- •Annual Operating (21390)( 14108) (5997) (488) 15901 17536 18515 'Early Net To City (6033) 1357 6592 ( 42y82) 5051 (7536 18515 I'~OTAL REVENUE vs, EXPENSE THROUGH 1984 is +$36, IT IS AN TICIPATE D THAT -AFTER 1984 ANNUAL REVENUE WILL EXCEED EXPENSES. BY APPROXI MATELY $ 19,000. TAX E FFECT ( p-2) TRAFFIC AND FARK.I NG Genera I The estimated traffic impact is based on Phase I (22,000 square feet of retail space) reaching marketing use in ' January 1979. One of the additional three phases of 22,000 square feet of retail spaces will be in use each of following three years for a total of 88,000 square '' fee t by 1983. Each phase has 141 on site parking spaces ~ available for a total of 564 spaces. ' Phase I - 1979 Due to seasonal marketing, the Phase I end trips at Sand Key shops will vary from 220 cars per day, six days a week in August to 430 per day, six days a week in December. Traffic generated from Clearwater and north surrounding areas - 450 August 99 x 2 = 198 trips December 193 x 2 = 386 trips ' Clearwater Pass Bridge count 5,213 - 1976 August 32/0 of tots I ' December 72/0 of tots I The remaining 55% of traffic will arrive from gulf beaches ' or Belleair Causeway. ' Total Project Plus Three Years - 1985 End trips will vary from 1,200 cars per day, six days per ' week in August to 2,300 cars per day, six days per week. in December. ' Assume 12~o per year increase in traffic count at Clearwater Pass Bridge - Total by 1985 - 9,184 ' TRAFFIC AND PARKI NG (q) Traff i s generated from C I earwater - S-~/o August 600 x 2 1,200 December I,ISO x 2 2,300 ' Clearwater Pas s Bridge count (assumed) - 9,184 August 13/0 ' December 25~/a Estimated Peak Hours Employees 8:00 - 9:00 A.M. 60 - 70 cars each phase ' Shoppers 9:00 - II:00 A.M. 10/0 Shoppers I I : 00 A . M. - 3 : 00 P. M. 80/0 Shoppers 3:00 - 5:00 P.M. 10/0 Employees 5:00 - 6:00 P.M. 60 - 70 cars each phase Public transportation to provide an estimated 4~/0 of shoppers. TRAFFIC AND PARKING (q) 2 ~ ~~ ~~ »~ _' .a,. ~.~~. .. ~.. ~~ ~~~, _ ~, ~w .. ~ .. ... ' ~~~ ~~, _ 4 -~ ~. :~. ~t e~ ~~ ~ ~. +. ~'~. ~,~{ ~- -; ~ --, ~""~~,, •..t=,, ~~~ .~.~ .. t F~. R~"i Y...,,~~ .: ~ a ~ r ~r'~ ~ n i ~' .~~ ~ ti~ r rc • .. ~ .. ,~~ t ~ ' tea, ~ -r ySr~.z1"~~ ; tiv~ ^h~~ ~' - « .,. ~ . ~ F,R~ y~~Tory -- ~t~~n~s .~ S'(R~ ~J u °1 0 0 °~Q o ~ o ~l CIOaa ~ Q ~~ ~ ~~ uao° io C d~ l~, t ~ s ~Ary ~ .EVES C d ~~ QQ~ ~~/1 L/ ,~ L7I7C - ~11~1 ~ adai OQL7 c crd~© ~ ~n ~~ ~D! -1Cgd~[ G.EAR~~A~R ~ , G~Eq PQ~-- --- G'1y }'W ~ ^ Cr ^ r_ 1 ~'~ATE~ a ~l P^~ O ^ nGCo~~c 1 oF- - - ._------- _ . h~~~ ~ _ _ ~ ~s ~ C 1 To ~ ~ P~A~ a ~- n (~ C '~=:~ Q ^ ~_J C /~0 ^sc~t L,_Ja~ 1^Q~7C Cl L-) CI Cl 1 fed D ^ CJ D D ~~ 1 ~ ~°~ ~-- ~- -~ r'---~ C_1 C~ ~l C~ ^ n r~ ~ r e C (/D ~ 1 ~- ~ _ C~ Q 1 ~a~~Qa~~~O - ~j~~ 1 ~/~l ^ ~l it ~~ Q "NORTEI ~ ' VICINITY MAP ®CA1..E : 1~~ 2000 l~ ~1 / ,~ L.~:~._-~w8 ~OQ z CTS t~1/ ~~ ~~- ~ ~~ ,~ I 1 ~~ V V Q~ ~~ ~~ ~~ `~I J ~~ N ~~ tC1" M~ ii I i ~ ~ t-+ ~c C~ `1_f" NORTH oo'~ AC'1~4CE1~.T PR[~~Ei~T.Y„. . ~., - w t~.~+c~.~+w wow ~~w _ -°~---- .---- ~U ,~`f ~Y' ,, ~ ~ ~ q~ ar ~ rr ,, ~- ~- v ;~ ,~ VIEW INTERFERENCE View interference is negligible as is demonstrated in the photographs. The residential units to the west are primarily orientated to the west. The 24 ft. to 29 ft. height of the project will not appreciably interfere with the residential unit view to the harbor since the occupied floors of these buildings is at 13.67 ft. elevation. The site currently has dense undergrowth shielding the view of the harbor from Gulf Boulevard. The design of the project raised 8.67 ft. above the parking will afford a view under the buildings. VIEW INTERFERENCE (s) HOUSING - NOT APPLICABLE HOUSING (t) ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE ' The property is man made fill, therefore, there will be nothing of value found on the site. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL'SIGNIFICANCE (u) WILDLIFE ~xistinQ Conditions `Phe proposed construction site is on the east side of Sand Key, dust soutt- of the `l'oll Booth. `1'nis whole area . oi' Sand Ke,y is sand pumped up from Clearwater harbor, and the vegetation is of recent origin. The dominant plant, and Otte only one of any importance is the Australian rive Casuarinr-, lepidopY-loia. This tree is an. exotic plant and. in many parts of Florida has become stash a problem that Wildlii'e officials are starting.; an eradication pro,~rram to destroy large numbez•s of them. 'l'he Australian Pine is often able to intrude into ' natural vegetation areas and "take over" to tY-e detrime~it o~' natural species. In this case, these -pines can uril,y be considered as a "weed". ' 'I'he Australian i-~ine is the only r~;al vegetation on this site, so there is a lack of ~cruur-~i cover for must typos of local wildlife. The only amphibians or reptiles on the site are the anole Anolis carolinesis and the toad i~ufo americat~-us. ' The only mammal common to the site is the raccootl Nroc.yon ' lotor, and these appear to move out into the area of this project at ni,~;ht from the small marsh to the north. ' 'Phe Australian Yines do serve as .riestiri~; sites for several species of birds at various. times of the year, but none were evident at the time of this study. ' The waters of Clearwater Harbor adjacent to tYiis site are still relatively productive, with a few patches of the marine ' trrass Halodule occut•ink~; in the shallow water along the southern ' WILDLIFE (v-I) . portion of tnis site. At the north end. of this site there is a deep channel that comes up to within some 50 feet of the existina~ seawall, which because of its depth, is unvegetated. The exposed nature of the shoreline has prevented the.growtY~ of any significant intertidal marsh gasses. Impact of Y'rox~osed Construction The present plan calls for the construction of a small shopping center on this site, with the removal of most of the existii~tr Australian Pines. What wildlii'e that is present will probably Inoue to the northwest and find suitable 1'iabitat on the County owned .land that is being preserved for park use. Uue to the p;enerully poor habitat offei~~d ty tl'ie Australian Pine, it is my professional opinion that it would be best to destroy all of this species and plant live oak, cabbaga palm or scme other t;ret native to these barrier islands. It is my ~ opinion that l~inallas ~:ounty should take the lead in starting to control tt~~e spread of this plant. i'he construction of a dock from tYie north end of this site will cause no significant damage to the existing marine communities. much a dock will not impair ttie tidal circulation so vital to these areas, and will iil tune collect fouling organisms that servo as food for several t=ame fish. Conclusions 'rhe proposed clearing and construction of a small shopping center on tYiis site will have no sit,~riificant impact on the wildlife in this area due to the already WILDLIFE (v-2) disturbed. nature or tr,e site. ahe construction of a docx out into c:learwater ~iarbor at the north end of the site will have no significant imp~.ct on the e~istiri,~~ :~~arine communities. ~~:esx~ectfully. sub_iiitted~ ~ ~ ~~~ -~r. ~-.eyvJ~.rd i:. Iv_atl~etivs WI LQLI FE (v-3.) SHADOW EFFECT The building is designed for a maximum height of twenty-five feet. Three sides of the site have streets, water or public parks. Currently, the area south of the site is occupied by low rise apartments, the nearest of which is 120 ft. from the proposed building. There is no apparent restriction of benefits currently enjoyed by occupants of adjacent properties. SHADOW EFFECT ( w) FINANCIAL INTEREST Owned and built by U.S. Realty Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of United States Steel Corp. ' Financed by U.S. Steel Insured by U.S. Steel FINANCIAL INTEREST (x) TRAFFIC CONTROL General traffic analysis is reviewed in section (q) of this report. Traffic control equipment and safety devices are not antici- pated until completion of the fourth phase in 1981 based on projected traffic impact of the first two phases. A traffic control signal will be required at mid point of the property along Gulf Boulevard to handle II:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. traffic. TRAFFIC CONTROL (y) COMPATIBILITY Architecturally the concept will be so planned and designed as to create a strong and exciting appeal to the "discriminating" market. The U-shape configuration provides maximum frontal exposure to the water vistas and creates a courtyard-like setting for luxuriant landscaping and open sky environment. All shops are designed to face the water. The cluster contains 22,700 square feet of leaseable space and will be divided into storerooms as required by tenants. Set into a relaxed and .natural environment, gracefully augmented by luxuriant landscaping, the Shoppes offer a long awaited counterpoint to conventional shopping in the Sun Coast area. The project is master-planned for four conveniently intercon- nected clusters of specialty and convenience shops - boutiques, fine jewelers, artisan shops and unusual restaurants, offering a casual, intimate and relaxed atmosphere - a shopping "retreat". A picturesque seascape-landscape panorama will stretch before ' the shopper's eye. And across the bay, the City of Clearwater, the bluffs of Belleair and historic Belleview Biltmore Hotel are gracefully silhouetted against the sky, adding to the mag- nificence of the scene. Sand Key in Clearwater adds still another significant project to the growing community - the Sand Key Shoppes. Structures to the west across Gulf Boulevard are high rise condominiums or resort hotel. To the north low rise (22 story) condominiums. ' The low residential character of the proposed project will be compatible with the low rise apartments on contiguous property and being about 1,000 ft, from the high rises across the boulevard will not create a severly contrasting high-low mass conflict. ' COMPATIBILITY (z) ' HEA l_TH SERB' I CES Not Applicable HEALTH SERVICES (aa) MASS TRANSIT The site is now served by the Central Pinellas Transit Authority; however, Director Wilbur Barnes plans to extend Route #10 to Sand Key as demand increases with an initial schedule of every other hour between 7:00 A.M. and 5:30.P.M. from the mainland through Clearwater Beach. Mr. Barnes also advised that the hours and frequency of the service will be increased as the shop employees and shoppers require service. Wilbur Barnes Executive Director Central Pinellas Transit Interviewed: 9-2-77 Anticipated Public Transit Daily Ridership 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Max. 70 150 246 340 363 378 Min. 37 80 128 176 189 196 Avg. 46 97 160 219 235 244 MASS TRANSIT ( bb) EC Ecological considerations are covered in Sections f, Vegetation ' and v, Wildlife. ECOLOGY (cc) NOP1-LOCAL COORDINATION I. Pinellas County - Dock 2. School Board - not applicable 3. County Planning - conformance with land use plan '' 4. Health Dept. - Restaurants 5. SWFwMD - Irrigation wells ' 6. Tampa Day Regional Planning Council - not applicable 7. Florida Dept. Pollution Control - not applicable ' 8. Dept. Natural Rescource - not applicable 9. Div. State Planning - not applicable ' 10. Coastal Coordinating Council - review of development in coastal zone applicable ' II. In-°ernal Improvement Trust - Dock. 12. .FHA - not applicable 13. EPA - not applicable 14. US Corp. Eng. - Dock 15. Bureau of Sport Fishing & Wildlife - preservation of marine and upland species NON-LOCAL COORDINATION (dd) MARKET A NA LYS I S The market area sales analysis supports the concept of a specialty shopping center on Sand Key. The size and char- acter of the existing retail facilities within a fifty-mile radius of the site has been determined by a field survey. The closest competitive facility within the Market Area is exemplified by St. Ar,mand's in Sarasota. The quality of the Sand Key specialty shopping center is expected to effec- -----~-- ti~ exp~an unsatisfied sales potential in the market area and realize its fair share of the market in this growing metropolitan area. EXISTING CONVENIENCE RETAIL FACILITIES (Within 15 travel miles from Sand Key Shoppes) The convenience facilities with a department store traffic generators are the major components of the existing centers in the area. Maas Brothers and Burdines offer a limited department store quality merchandise sought by the affluent segment of the "in place" population and the vacationing tourists. There are very few specialty shops and boutiques in these retail facilities. Countryside Mall (13 travel miles from site) 150 Tenants 1,150,000 square feet of floor space 83 acres of I and Opened in August 1975 6000 Parking Spaces Major Tenants: Sear-223,690 square feet J.C.Penne;~-166,886 square feet Robinsons-148,480 square feet t MARKET ANA LYSIS (ff-1) Clearwater Mall (8 travel miles from site) 198 Tenants 1,000,000 square feet of floor space 70 acres of land Opened in 1973 5000 Parking Spaces Major Tenants: Iveys Montgomery Ward Gayfers Burdines Sunshine Mall (6 travel miles from site) 85 Tenants 473,000 square feet of floor space Opened in 1968 Major Tenants: J. C. Penney RETAIL SALES ANALYSIS - While the market area population has been shown to be expanding and in significant numbers and, with it, the size of Effective Buying income (EBI) of the population, it is useful to note the nature of Retail Sales Potential in the Area. Table 7 is a compilation of retail sales data taken from Florida Statistical Abstracts over a four-year period and demonstrates steady retail expansion in terms of taxable sales dollars in the nine-county market area and in the State as a whole. SEE NEXT PAGE (ff-3) FOR TABLE 7 MARKET ANALYSIS (ff-2) Count (Primary) Pinellas Hillsborough (Secondary) Hernando Manatee Pasco Polk (Tributary) Citrus Sarasota Charlotte FLORIDA Growth Rate• Florida Primary Area Pinellas County TABLE 7 TAXABLE RETAIL SALES ($-000) 1971 1972 $1,276,250 $1,521,853 1,504,788 1,704,414 23,995 196,630 100,705 496,438 31,146 228,858 137,694 592,.758 26,803 38,169 367,809 431,908 45,923 60,317 $18,870,504$22,176,457 - 17.5/0 - 16 - 19.2 15.7% 16.5 14.5 15.4% 11.6 19.3 During recent years it has been stated that overall growth rate in Florida is slowing down w~~ile the "Suncoast Area" is incorporated within the designated market area of this analysis is continuing to expand at a promising rate. .The above tab- ulation demonstrates that although growth rate in Florida has in fact decreased during the four-year period investi- gated, Pinellas County has not followed the State's trend. It also demonstrates the relative strength of the Pinellas County market. As the market area undergoes continued residential, recreational, recreational, and commercial development, indicated in population growth and income statistics, a continued upward adjustment in local expendi- tures is to be anticipated. 1973 1974 $1,742,467 $2,079,172 2,016,942 2.,117,742 40,213 290,565 188,305 745,976 46,872 368,787 244,421 924,985 51,449 67,039 516,704 609,823 76,905 98,030 $25,668,644$29,625,012 MARKET ANALYSIS (ff-3) MARKET DEMAND The concept and the impetus for a specialty shopping center development arises from the need of a rapidly growing middle and upper-class market in the Suncoast area which is not adequately served by the caliber of existing retail facilities. The under- lying considerations supporting this impetus are based on a realistic appraisal of the developed facts and studied trends in the economic life of the Suncoast communities within the fifty- mile radius of the proposed center. I. The Suncoast area and the State of Florida are part of the officially recognized growth region of the country: G overn- ment study indicates that the Clearwater, Tampa, St. Petersburg area will be the fastest growing in Florida. 2. The income level and purchasing power will continue to rise over a long period of time. 3. Population will increase at the rate predicted if not at an even higher rate. 4. Tourism and seasonal vacationing business will grow at a very fast rate. 5. Tax-free social security benefits on the Suncoast are at a billion dollar level and increase annually at some 12Q/o. CUSTOMER APPEAL I. The design concept is to create a strong and exciting appeal to the "discriminating"market. MARKET ANALYSIS (ff-4) 2. Only strong first-class tenants will be sought. 3. Other competitive shopping centers of the caliber proposed for Sand Key are not, and most likely will not be built i n the area. 4. The shopping center i•s master planned for four conveniently interconnected clusters of specialty and high-quality con- venience shops. 5. Approximately 88,000 square feet of total rental space is planned. CONCLUSIONS The economic climate is timely for the development of a first- , class speciality shops type commercial facility. The demand for a varied in character and distinctive shopping atmosphere is strong enough to warrant the development. Our analysis further indicated that: I. The population in the Market Area is expected to increase from approximately 2,050,000 at the present time to 3,628,100 by 2000. Economic Projections - Sand Key Shoppes ' 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Retail Sales(000) 2227.5 4252.0 7722.0 10692.0 11436.5 11888.0 ' Sales Tax(000) 77.4 161.6 263.6 363.5 388.8 404.2 Payroll(0~0) 462.8 1028.0 1805.4 2650.7 3000.2 3311.9 Taxes to City(000) 13.6 29.0 46.8 64.4 69.6 74.3 ~ Const. Costs(000) 960.0 1100.0 1270.0 1460.0 MARKET ANALYSIS (ff-S) 2. The Market Area for the proposed specialty shopping center is one of the fastest growing areas in the country. 3. Access to the project is excellent from all directions. 4. The total unsatisfied market area sales potential available to the proposed shopping center located in the analyzed market area is expected to be approx- imately $15,000,000 by 1980. 5. The speciality market share available to Sand Key Shoppes will be increasing with the rapid increase of the general population and in particular the rapid increase of the affluent segment of the Sun- co~ast region . 6. The steadily increasing tourism will constitute a substantial purchasing power of the total market potential. 7. To provide a well-balanced specialty retail concen- tration, a representative number of first-class com- pact convenience stores will be provided in the center. 8. The potentia-I population on Sand Key demonstrate s. an immediate need for these kinds of facilities. MARKET ANALYSIS (ff-6) CONSTRUGTIOPd SCHEDULE U. S. Realty-anticipates commencing construction late 1977 for Phase I. It is expected to be completed within one year; Phase II will be started at this time with the subsequent Phases III and IV being undertaken each year thereafter. The total project should be completed by January 1982 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE (gg~ SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA The site is located in Zone U13'EI. 12.0 ft. MSL is established by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development, July 8, 1977. Zone V13 is described as area of 100 year coastal flood with velocity (wave action). ' The owner intends to comply with ordinance Section 7~9 and 7-10 of the city of Clearwater which embraces the Federal Guidelines for flood proofing construction in flood hazard zones. United States Steel will insure the buildings for builder risk, fire, wind storm and extended coverage as well as flood to the ' maximum extent allowed under the HUD Title 24 regulations which will be effective at the commencement of construction. The main occuaied floor of the building is at elevation 13.67 ft. ' Walls to grade elevation will be "knockout" type or structural to resist anticipated loading. Electrical installation below elev, ' 12.0 ft. will be waterproof. Elevator will be automatically pre- vented fro m. proceeding below EI. 13,67 ft .. during flpod conditions. SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (hh) il. ~` e1a.. (.; I€+,j , ~'. ~-;~' ~. a ~~ ~i *..~ ~' ~ ~' ;{„ . t i `, R' r- ~M ~. ` a :. ~`_ ,. i` fir' D':: ' Y; ~,.' " :'; ~:T ',!'; °~ ii,y ~'_ ~~= . . ~.:~ ..' K' :.;,,~ ,~_;,° '° ". ~ytj. '~:. xk . 4~'~ ; ',",x.,: .. x• ''N• _ - t~".'.. ,4 ~t copy AvaHable WtV b•1~' / y{PtcT ~-, BLy/,'l~,b' d' hGlcw~-l- YJ{M.I N14H ~M' hiY. >-O' '+ .~ ~~~ ~~' ,ire ~,~~ --- ~ _ I i I ~ I _ - `--- - ~~' -T r.-.. ~ I r. Ali ~` I I I it ~ n II l ~ ~ - ~' SJ \ ~ ~i /r-i ~II - I i I ' ,~ II I 'µ~ U I ~J U V V I I ~~ I ~ :: ~ , PN ~E; CVO G ~ ,°N A~S~ i ~~G •~' I I ~•iPFiE wv • A '6 19 'r ~ ~p . = ~~I ' It N I n ) ! ~. _ q~ I II I~{ ^^ i I j ~ II ~' ~I ^ d ~I r_ .F A Q - rt i I .. I i~ ~ I ' ^ ^ ~ ~' ^ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ' ^ I ~. ^ ^ tl ^ I `v ^ I' [7 ~ I I , .- ., t - `L_ _ I I -~ ,_~_ ' ~~ - ~'1~.A5 t~~\ sYl r..,v ~ 4!b.r~ .tlL.rt~ T I~ L~ H -~~r ~ ?~ 1-•~D K E.Y ~ h O P P ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ I~ LeUa~L D~~~e~PTiar-+ !~ ro2TIC~+ Or . UWD ,y SiLTIDM i~ ar1C !D, ~`1u5H~,p ir7 ',r •::-I Ck.J(rE ~J ~A 7f, P:ti;ELi-A`l GPJN"^(, ~L%IZ:7h PwG' (~1-Vo GUR'1>'te•R GC5LFI17EV AC PDI.i.-0`>/y' SE1iiN~lll-i!o R1 k R7~`-i'' .^J 'fkE kAS; Pte:]' Kl/vltT-.~F `LPY ;.ICE .x G/.F P a; urv/r~U7, ;'`k"!Yc Rly~i r1o~ !/I'i k I:.'b ~iGT Iryr1T /x W11Y, ~iM7 FIN i7 OEItYe RT 1F!E iN'F.~'7C.%T 1~-F .'P ~ ~+~ ~:F 'anY i.;~-iE NITZt Y!fE UrE L'£T'yt!L-~4 ~TL'H> 11 ~ :OL f~tiD 6FJI-Ib A1~RTF{ 1°4Q' aji" NFbT, 4,182.'.h P[ZT FC~M riff -f>r•1 zf.°y'f .JK~IE+~ Lk" Nt1 L' a~>?o~-~ W, ~wIGN F~NY ~~ ,4t.5d ~i~!E !u%Trf~veST ~L~1CK L~ °.fdTIDN 20' "SiE+-FG6 F~K''N vk2°v/j' 31" EA"lr, R`[!i. ~I Fs"` A~~+.i ~iFt.i RllovlT G'% ~W'Y LJHE. 'r0 'I2 ~'r'I 't':'•rti ~ RJR h F~WT L~ ~Pii1HMNG)• ibN 31~eD fr7;r~f ,x ®L+IW r-;i uollTlN ~'E. ~~7cK ;r~ 4~ i~''~1''eAST ','-~1. ~! BEET A~.?+U 5R1C I?YoFiT-GL-NhY 7- A l-°' I'+U-} IkON P1FEi T~iF~J/lr. ~Ji-1 ~.iDU'Pi A~1°4L'2yo~ f"1`.5.ifj r'LbT ~ k~i 'X' °:t:ra1 h!E .:a~:t`ET`c `~EF'.v~'.:._ :-fF.+::~ :G;.TrJ~'-i/s '.'71'r!' ~Y;°K/v' ?~ EKjr?i'fN~ ~\~k-f~c2y .'•Ft~~J3Z~vkT'L2 ~D~i' Tp k PD'!-IT N[K.In1kFS~P. K!-1JJM Ifi FdHT ~A' F!"'. La-,': C+i~.Gi-.GL°: ',:{Er`iL~C S~TJ2NI~.i~1 T~ 'TNL ~:7'~-!7 ~ Eg.~14H1°J!o FLrI ~.TfN ~}7°h1r'£^.'~E16T .143.10 FEET ~ Ni'* GJt BN Ti+L 9GVab.1~~ TNfJ•L,L t.~v-^i~ ,.;~ Sc~."N 4~°4di ?i?" FA~i7 TD :aE ~vh""..R'S !~ ~~-~hF~rkT^~,~Z ~-bd~;LK~ "ryiEt~E. xL'-~ ~. `a"-' \YKitlC% IWD enNv71-U/ ~-IEP,r iYl'~', I~-1 k ~KT}tEF~Y [~KFL•rbr-J ;v '?H6 RR:^~~•~,.a-~,»r-tr pblN ~ A' ... ,.. .i~-+!s 6,0 ~e'+ZE`• f-14~ °C «f •°r'~f~ `~O TYt]HES VI'1H: .' A R71C110r1 7~ ~D iwl ~TioN i7, Ytln-1'~11P ?!? xViYF. kao-JioC IS ~6T :~14:ELI-A> /~."-7T(. r;.o2:;•P~° k~.1C~ ~,-i[e KIRT~#~R ~-`LFJHF~7 k7 k76i0\Y5'. P71i1ilfillWto ~ R ~r1T Li-1 "(rIG iA`JT7.&.'-Y P~U-IT OF '.`!kY ;,,~n+E OG G:JLL r3.xA'VkRp, ~'fh~ K,J/c7 1Jo. Gq°I~ k I~ ~ 41UiT-,~-\v'tiY 1PdD fDINT P.ILIrJb Al jNG IAfT62SELj1~7N OF s+db R'JoP?'-OF-IYkY UHF ~v1 Tr} '(F{E UNE °..[~': ~JF.F~~{ ~"rlJlaS 14 Pd-4: ?o, RND ~LI~-~a N~?H !°k4'~'" \Y~S?T fi1P11,?L FLET ~ .,sjr. sa:ntcur ~~ c~ ~~ 'QGTlvrl Iq :Vi"::!~ ai:~T Ki A:kO 7~{C va~'H~NF~f ciXLrifJL 3F %£~Ta-I ZO: 1kF3aLC ~-bZT}~ M' 13'31` E/fif I~~.~ R~CT klDr-L hfdD WuN'f•5f-\VhY UNE Tp k !~2 1~-I~:H IRD'-! p:~ ~.~ h FDINT OF EEa.J-:Nlryo~ ~i,M ~1D r"DIµT G~ ~Gi~N,I-Ya (IUTIALJL' f•Y,~'1~ 42°i3'bl°F%T Aii,Vf Ftf.T TL A 'n .~N Ili !f,TJ; T~~ K,>1 4an-rt ~1"av''J. ~f :~sc- e¢IET 7v ib-I 'x' ~ ~+ T~+E '~a~vna-L; TH~u.~ ~a.;-4J'~-1!. xuT+-F a7°Aro' 2q" rk~r, 1D TNT WMi.QS OF ~MC~LX1Y.k TD k opINT HFX~INRFTY-~C k:~bWIJ Rs 2iHT'~ °7K lc~fV1CNlE~~[.E; 7rfGwaL 2~iGra+iu.~ 70 ~ R~.:Y OP 2fJdNyl~;/i RoH ycv`Pa'f7'4ro'~" ~ I°t~.laMesT To hJ 'x' avf a-+ ~+~ 5ec.\vRty; :~ew.E. ~o.rnuw~~ ~nfi ? ~°~t~' 24" fir Tv ruE \V~~ c~ ~rvz~vn-r~.~ IAAa3~Ri -MEHLY klP•1G° ~ktD~YK ~ RkD Wi•IRHIo "ft~2E\V~1f-f Iii R IJ~R'~'PJ~~~LY PKPG~?ON YO /~'RILME~fTICt-l~L' FO~N7'P: CGF7'TktM lr4/o I.q AGK[y wioKG 'J2 1-Ysl7' PHk:L A+L IAIfi7Rt1M10r-I -TAKIfJ•1 r~M `MINE`( ~f ~Pa~1GR PrJ~I°-IFX?IrLs ~IU-Y.E`'7 I~• iKMPr~ I PIIR~Dh JUUE. 'l~.il?1~ E ~ ~ ~ .-__._-__J.. -~ ,'. an' - o ~, zo,~~~ ~y -vc+-,I~ e~-~~~5 as•rc~cr ~---- yil¢ttf 6l.cv. rI.O~ , 6 ~~ c~ ~t - h t :•. ~u. r¢a~'~.i'.' MKea-I N~ft4:ilk't1iK ~~ •1 ;~ .;: ~ . r ' bai Tt:F,r E,lc\' .< ,~ , . ,d ' ~ ~ _ s. .~ ~-3~s~c 4 xeyel. o wv.." ~Dr ~' 1 1 aL.!'L' S~..ET &iPl. ~'~z~,r~R ~ ry.r' s.~ ------------1---------------------------------7> - -- _ _ ~. ---- % ~. _ 1~ 'a ~ , >' fi... . i _ i~ -,y~,, . ~:' . ~ .:. t. M ~;. ~;• =; ~' r, . 11' . „ r ~~ ~. k: i•.. , i =~ ~~~.. 'la' LP pF41NNIFJU / _ ~ •<. -- - > '~ ~i I ~, r y~: a p~ p I 4 ~' _ ~_.} i _ „ .~. -„ _ 6' -~ ~ J ai Y _~-_ `~ [ _ .~ y Iq~~~ u ~ ---pl~ ~- '` F q- - r' -- ` 5 V V I ' Y ~.._. 4r i r ~.,; i~ `~ql ,cP e.m ,w.,.~. Y --- ~- I I -- 2f~V Util'~ -- -}yo.b"I' N/YI 13' f"G v la SIR p 7 I -. j ~''~ 1 - - c ~ ~~~ d ~~ , ?.4+^,NL ~ scc LAnoSC+,Ptrxr RAN / ~ ~ ~ i -< a~ ' Gi ~ ~~ clvacOW Ps~ro,I~,pLC~ v y, ;cµ% oror '...., g ~- t- -~. -- - _- al - - - S ...._ ~ _. _ _ ® _~ f w!uuo mv,ce~ ~e I ~~_ .. ..-. / -~ _ ~ .-._ --~- ~m~. I , k„ I iA"rr ~iI/ 32' O" ^JY:. ~~' d' s'C" ?D' 6" '1D'.O" %D'-U" ;;..C~' 'Ki',p' ~p',Q" ZD'-O 18'-O`1 ~.IZ'd' '32 ?~'~" ~ .. ... '"'•O.. ' ~,•o,~ ;~,~ sex. ~ ~ ~ - e -- --~- :~ ! y _ _ ~ i I h ~- , I , A ,,~ o _-_-_,_ nr, .~u ~ _ el _ 0 k _r, ~ FA+ek'~ :54~MM-¢S m ~U' i" ~nGrl = ~~s` 4" - - - -._ ~ _ 'r°R=a~ ~ . ~'dl... _~r}y, ~~~ .. `i - ~~ -^a - ~-w ~~- , I ~ I~. f I ,~.- -.- __ _. ~J .:o .. U~FL ate. Itl 4fAet ~ ~. ~~: ~ ~•~ ~ }''~" _. ~~ /' ! ~ ~ 2~kty e!awe < ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - 4 - j~ - _ R ! i ~: r- 9 1- B ~ ~ 11 ~ i 0 '~ -+1--t y,mr t9 ! y' '~ ~ I ~ $~ ~ hnc+.17*~~ , 2H!k'Wm I~7E+k. VW X56 III ~ ~ ~ _ .~ .. . p-utK:r~;, i5 r',ph~eS s id±d' dn~+ • I5G'.p ~._ _ ..- ---- ,-. ... , ..__ u e' ~ ~'I c I !3 ~ ~ , .aw. r~s ~~ ~ 4 ~+ b ~ ~I -°"'~ '~u°p~ sjl'+r • I V. ~s+cs :} ~ 1- ,PA.r<? ~i, ^ M J ~ ~i AZ i' < ~ I f. ~ ~eo t ~ ,~ ~•,,:~ ~, G':ob. °".e-, ~..R ~{' y' ~neR ~1a "5r.:sG,w~ ct°x p ~~ ~_,. Axl. pn/`J~'1~~ ~ +-- a ~~~-F~~ri iGrlP~ uc aJr~cc'afR:a. T~ ~.~ I d ~~ ~ 1, Ot -- >Jt j' i,,,~,,~OnnD t~,~(ors M }, GINIfNC7 etF.Vhl:('N rq..T Y _ - 5 ~ K! -I 5~.xv-!G_" "lirowra, Y ~i+F~+ ~ ~.,,t ~ n -w d T . -}! - _ ._ .. _ ! - - .. 1... ' >-'' 219',~~ , Via' ~,d' ~a'-L" 5% ~'-b' - _ _ ,~'' dd °s~ _ z~s'•< ;,~ nti'v I ~ x`~. a-sr. ~ ~ 4' WIOt WW PMN>• r01C ~u. .0! xJ - I ~ .. r.. 6~''b FJ+. 'I ~' ~?. d''b- _ ~ " r~ 3'r''k&bd~'•6~Pa. 3S°~'L rA~I ~ '~4aES o«, ~ 'N,r~CC: I ~ .. ., lU ~kWN S a !U'D CACd'1 =~ ILx9-d .. -- - ------. - _ ._ ~, ~' ~ il,'~ ~J;C!/~1G •J!lu'_ I _--- -1 ~`' ~~ ~ W ~(~wiY. , Tr~~ t s, 9i~eE »~,ek~~ d~taea s7a~s ~~ .,,,.,% ~' >s ~ ~ I . to.t. ~ ~(-0fu, lJ~i(al. A~'Cf'0! 'J'1 ~ ! B i ~~ _ '~ 1 ~ . 1 - c.~ . i _ - ~ ~ c c --- ---- a ~~. ~ o_ -~- ra ~.~ ,R ac 1+-Ye ~ ~r arc o e ~ -~ L - ~ka~ ~ ~ v ~ ~,° v 'k~ o I ~ 9° " " I '~ , y i~fio.k.7uee'. <,r,.n, ~. a,~ «na l' : J , - r NICto+a. `~ .+. !'J'•9' Bnt+'f =' IIwO'-"F° -~. t :4.. i - ~-- - ;mow? Nlis~:{% 1:'~/el. r'7{O"S W~60Na 1,Ml4b t1(~h~; fA bFN.6 ; Q, ~~ vjso~.~idss- ~ I ]~ I i o ~~" ~ I ' e,e~' 4~ ~ rj,' I ~ ~ ~ I _ .',Va ca.havK ...° m~ w'•o lo''o a-d em' . / „ y° >~:~ - fi.. i ry. ,i- - 1, ~ iy =. }. awc~n~waa~ .. _ ' ~~ i ,,,, <' xR ~' p' ! d / I !i'iG /~-9 ( ~S'~. .7'b . j~5'.~'' '('w'.Y !J'J W •9 ~ u7'C ?/'U is •0 2a O 2~ / ~r ; U Z4 G r %~'0 >;; A u v .~ ~ 0 i ~-1_ ' ~ ' sib •.\~.. / ~ ~ ~~ ErtpfO Mb"aA ~ '[' ~ ~ ,7~a. ~ i'i 1 r ; ~ ~ \~ o . LrY. OM~+C 9(~ e / fw0~Ml1. j(. ~~! 1 Y ' ` R. ''°' ~~ `.. ; ~ ~ ~ ~.~ .._ ~ -__ -"_rWCY lul -~-~ t _1 ~~~ ~ •. ~f `~~ p.us _ __. r_. _ . _. I i C 8 ~. -_'rt_ ~. ~ ' _ . _. __~' _' ~:'~.e 'y/AlXlv6iG"'7-egµl +1~,0~ _ r~_ ~o I A . t'. i l 1 ' ~ ~` ! Y ~L ? . i ~ " ~ - _-~. - -i~- - - L -t'_<' ! .n"rU'- ~ ICS",. ' ~.Y ~ y~eab •nw! ~ ! 1 ~ w --~ ' - . _ 9` i ~f' - -~ti ' -_ _ F~ulri'.4v- ~.~a JH^5..r v~ r-^~ ~ - -- - ~- P.+,v INU• ~NIt I~NW c~ANr PV.N - ~ ., N . i ,H '~Ic09a;Ar--.. i ~~ ~ X1'4.+--. PLOt'7.5a O y, lA~E7C ~h~Y~.- C9.5' '' ! ' f~111 IK*17iVL' -- 4lU.e.' -- f~--- ' . m . -', ...~T ter. ~ ~ -- ~nf2'!2'gEn~y, - .. . A fD2T1Ra cp lleyDe+ ~11Uf+ i7 TOnMS"t~~ 39 5e+.•rf, 1CaNisE !4 Fi57, aN6u~Ej.:vNTY, FLGK,DA,kNC _ 2NWe FURlfl6ft tX5LIQ.FS~-'7 AS 5~i0YSC 6L%I,-W'~H(. Al A FDINT GI-~ TIE Gl:/lTkiY GcYJ1r d~ t"rkY L/JE GG !4,'J` ply?al ~iL ~ N9.61'1, R Im ~ +;I~~ ~ ynr ~;~ ~'~ z>El~+ra ~T T.1t ;r1~tR`-wiiq-i c+; Sad ew=rr a'~~~. uurs wrTrt MG ~e eETarr~1{ ~cr~s ~,wv37;~G Ovw. ~~i?'+ ''?~~~~" w(yJf. ~4,v~'.fd. FEAT Gka-+-M~'~a~:-~.sT Caq~ cr rav ~~ra-1 Iq, wN~c+i r~'NT !5 kuo T~ `P ~'r-~~T s2tie~ of ~cra-~ ~; ~H~. ~~t42°~~ ?~"__~ . ..47~iJ0 GttGi iuwo sra~ krsfja ~vx,' uNE ~b ~ '!2' ;AD,1 PIFE RR k 1'~rGF efGINNINI, r~1 5kp ,ANT z E'!1,,..~+~-~o ~, ~u':Y.. ~ ~^ ~ Mb.6I T w k'r• :~.-N r.~: TM~ ara ar'au a~' ~ 1~5, 07 k~cT m ~' ><' •yT l u 1r,E ~,~vtu.; ~ ~ 1NGY.L LGMTINJL SaVTN4~'aftr $1" FiVf ~ ~E vXiYxhOd' /.t~R~w*~ KntCeo~G ~ k rn!~T HBKII~IhF'tFlt e,loar~ ~ x~',T'tb" Fd lANfr~IB+G~' 'INtN[.~ kY.TuRvll.u~ 4i h+s fa~+r,z af~,,NN~r-,~ Ru., ~a.~i "rf'~' 2q" F.n~-r 13.18 ~ ro ro~ •~' ~vr ~,-I Tl.a. -i 'If~+~ ID~J'il~1v',~!;e SG~~is,F 4A04r•29' W6T TO ~tG w!'1~.25 a ~/+i~v1'*i~C NhR8G4~ 1TkENGE. ALr~N/a ~v w41CP'!~ IIwD-U110rnUO 3{~QLWnN Iu h N7~1~-GbTE'RL1I DIRiGT1p~1 'm ~!/eerrf,•zTI;~N~ PaNT,~"• LoNTMVI~s I.`1 ?rltf~s /~L -;??~'r4YQ+'IkTiON 'A-'~1.~ta°t ~f1f1/iY 6Y IvAVNr~ ft+'I~I~c2',w_ -L+~NGES s,,l.' , ik+1PAt FwRIt1F : ~N~ 'L*l tti'1 P ':. `,~ y L ' _._ _ ~'. -- - -- 1, Ph1PN bil~Il~1(~. ~1'atrJNU 'fofN. 163 ~E5 ~~ BOLT IN fkkMR'4T Bost copy ' Avaflablr~ ., A' zol-~~~-i~_ _K~~~~C~M~N'1~ 41tE AK~a 8I9A~?.iiw.~ 'ttc bvl'_t".,r~ ACEk (OPTIMUM U»ip_YJ~PI~ai 4bRp. I!fl° ,~Zf'.Dr11 -'_, 1'NNtK144~Aj.',Fk MaX1M Jr'1 '131~.f,~~a' ry"JIINUM (yyF.Ki.-VLe .(y ~b ~ ~' hR>Jn KtY ~r'IOPt'E~ - 41TE H2`ft r31248i1s1~'-r w.1~fr~~~ ~vaM OAEZ{NdTF,P~ !290 ~I~ffi~1iF . FkfZKfN~ AIQEk SHOWH 'lt}E/.~;: P~KYJbLh IN'TCRIOR ` IJaiPsAPlFdfi ~~~t~: GROr511~6+'6«p~l a'. ~ v" ~a e+, rarwHS. 01119 ;, a~ ~C yNofNNL~ii11FR 2°J`t G~i[sfi LFA:i81.E MF.W f9t4Y 1w16 ~MFA - ~~ '~; ~x~rxuw-~* '~12~ti'~! ~ i ~e, - ~~~-r ~~ , ~C ~Q ~ -'S 01ft PW.IV~'~0 ANY PAV~nL?IiF:l~tnfallR~~~ Wa. D2kIA tl~s t:r~v~Nv fti+~¢¢ ; -~ PAVGD AICfAS Ah intTce.1E7 tN' ~ ~1~7ivIV7~ PrAN c i a ^~ ~~ C tiT'~s ~°;« z ~; ;.,, Y,• 4+' 2~ ~~'~~" ,.,, . ri«~''. ~.', ..ti i:: :~~<' .. %F_;` :'~' f` : , 4 ~•- :' ~`~: ;t :~, -,,X( . s, N,`, 9;' ~.'~ (: ~..• ;;x.'. ;.~; f' ... ~,_ . .~:. , ~~; ~' • - r~- *y P~'. X y GULF ~L~t7• S~ GGq - - - ~ Best Copy Available .~..~.~. :s ... ~~: .._~~;~ /2/b !( PA2AGG5 LERN (1 /2 b:C , ST ,IG6GS1• ~7. AG6l4T- /HS 5c0 /NE OcD G~ a ~ .4 ~ N lj +i a~/2 "!: a/oP6 a/e5 F n z c. ,f .,I. `l t. '! ~ \ u r~ ~,~ ~ \ ~ ~ it r i*I ~ ~ '~Y~ \ ~/1 "L/k'rtPE 6/BS fx /Z'GC ~ '~ EX/SUN6 TLEES. • ~ / 1 +I r: i / \ ~.. .i, . ~ n .; ..' / '.~.. r •,• ~ \ t r /~ + + ~ y~ ~ +I e ~ t~ ~ If r +/r hA:. } ~ ~a 25L/r£ oAK '{ ~ ~~: ~1615•[//6 L3?d - '3 1D 25'UyE c~a K. ~' +/ ~ ":O ?SILT/E CAKS It , ~ ~ ~t ~ ~;~~ ~ ~ ,; ~ ,, ,,.; ~ ~ ~ it z +~ ~ - ~ f; ~ I I + ~' • , ~ + "i r, }: h I ~acl-+y Kr~Y 5+•~OPPES - F>-iRS~- Z ee I ~I y C I ~ ~/- ~'. R ~LI-?5~UY6lAK , ;;~~ ~ t; j *~ +~ ~ I +, +; i ~ ~. I I - .,,: . ; .,; t; ! ~ ~ + /P 14 L/L4:G.'t nr Sc6f ~9) ~ i t I ~;y . `~~ E OAK `` r~ ~ ~ ~ I .11,1e2s'UY ~. ! ! ' v i.:: -M ' I ?fi 15'L/Y< CAC - Its ~~ \ r / ~;~ , '~ ~ / '•` .f ~ / ~ _; -I ~ ~ - --- -- -- . _z.. _ . ~, \ _ _.__ \ , __ _._ .- /1'/B A.`/:*?AG-/S fE2,^1 t"'-'~CC ~ /'~.3C'~~/e•L/6G~1T~P!Af~'A~O.C!C.~ ` 3174 "L/b[61~ ;t! -' •~ x , ~. ~ ~PO»'ACF~in.3Pcz~M(~~.~. _ .,. ~ .~ ~ i .; +X' " + ~s ~ ~3+ 4 cr o.c, l4`~ ~i ~;+ X" R ~ x,.` 7,~,ti o. r ~ r rl ~ L o' 6A bee. E , , r: ~•'~` a ~. x r ~.~ ,r_En ~rAVE (a~ ' ~+ l - - ` - --- ~ ~ ? C~~-.-_.(a).,t~;. x , ,?E fd"/~iror ' fdHnE ct6~NDee3 ai _ _ i x - ------- x ~'~i~/N[1`h'HilP OLfAN~ ,r 1. ~ ---_-- ------'--. ._._.-----~'-=-_-~_- t:~~ ~(. ~ ~ ~,.'~ t.`~•:i - - --- '--. _. .:- - - '----- '-_.__._ __ - x"~)(+r /1 DtCS (/~ ~ /?G 1~~1':E CAKS -'- ~ ~ •~. ~~~`^< ~,.,;*,,T ._....-.~ 20 LS'E/f/6 CARS -~ T + A~ ~ . `~c11~~ ~ ~ ~T AGll~.s r//L'6 SaD /0•~'CAdEA6f GALA/3 ~.~ K' 9:'• ACS PAS s ,3T. /rl G,['1T/NL , r_~ .. -~ ~sYl.. cskwML / / /B~ AeoAeAG['S FECh'(i /Z•f c. G j¢/f A,PACA(?[•3 iEL:N' (' /ZcC. ~ ~ ! ~ j ..~. h~~: Fo}. ,~,": ~~ r ~ y,. .~ +r:'f." ~'' ~ A.:. C .. `i' 7.:..~ r ~ ..: 4~ ~; . !",~- k'...:. ~.:~i. a: ; !l; ... ~. ~;' ,. t':~,: Y. K. vY~ ~.i, ~~` ~, s.' ~~. ~.:. . .. ti< ,f.` 'T";. i}~ . l~Y~. F iM= 6r :ii r, E,:K.- ;t r~ [ ;,~, ~~. f,:~,: . _.,,-,:. ._~, -. ~, t z c '~ :u sri-Ww~--. -- ®~b" ~___.. _ *. _.. _ F _-._._- _ ~ y - -'~t _ . b C 1.ii _____ ... ._.--- 3~•0 y1V~. fw 17GVl4UC __. _. -_ .____._.__..___._ - __. _._._.. .r.-_.--__ -- t0• ~- i? ~F .\ ._. cl~,c X ~ ~~' X96 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .2' ~5 r„ ~Ud ~ .v ~c' 0D' ~~~ ~ ~ I . ~'• I ~~ ~ ~~ Jam. ~ _.. J e ," ~, . ~ - . N ~'~ ~ Oil' ' ~ ~, ~n~~-.-~ d' I "" I f~ ~"~ - -~ I ~o' i ^ c 316• E ~ E~ Od ~ I ~, ~m ~ i d Cad' ~~~~ j~~ ( a~ p o u o ^ o ^ ^ o o e o a ^ / I 6d' ' I a l od; -, I ~ I i `'9 I ~ cv1 I I j ~~+ i I Od r ~_J.. dN7,~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6D~ ~ '~~~;~.~~,. ?~; .sac ®D ~ b~' ___ .__._ .____. G _. ._ __ _h ~ _,D _ _0.__._. _~ ._.__... __~___ __ _.II I ~ I I i ~ I _ _ f'•V,~-E r1E ~ Ru r . ~ X42°'2~ 37~\Y - s~h~VhL-1r ~~` ~~ `~ ~~ ~>f",p U Best Copy Available W XI~d•11.L w Nv.N ~tx i. ~;f ;: `~~° ~. ,_ . ~~~~~ OhE~~~.~~ ~~~~ KEMOV>kl- f L~-t Naf G ~. Au. ~ r~ /tlY~tlC/d u.~ RNe ur+~i ~~~~ ~. ®--t~as~ ae a - _ ~ae~5 x~~H~t ~N i i 2 . ~L 1~ ~ Au~ad~l.WacTt~ ..~5- Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 td.: - • - =1~f , "Y, r~ .•S.. Bast Copy -x~, f._~- Avariabla ~ ;;. ~: ~>` .. >:~`• _ ~y . t -.--__--_____ - __-~-_ ~ '1 ~, tar -'-,-- --...___--------- ---------------r' - • ~:~,t +./ -- -__-- lhK (f,v,~ VLF ~ V UI- - ' L -~'(E-- -- _ 4~ T - _..- -.. -. . _ _.. ~~ ~,'' ;~~, ~ y1 I ~ ~io„E. a' :I r• - ~~ ~ c. ~~.. I ~~ iN TNIS ASEA TC RL>•tA~a '~ j I IWpowA{~I JCL 'KIII FM~' 61DG4f~LK ~ _[x~'i A•( as:~~v't~AiK~^6e Lo..~ ~ 'lei ` "O" ~ T ~Tt':oncv. oxrt I - -- - -- ~-- •0 ,.~ , .. _, •s I ~ -- .. -'--. - .-._ _. _ _ 1 ~ I b Id • • '- • •b_~ le_~ •~i: '--r(, _...-.---• --='L4- Flo'. •la_ I6 ~'• '~' ly ~' 0, Ip•• 10 •Ip• ~` le' •~ ~ •b °9• w'O" ~b!Q y- -_-_-_-_~-=-=-~-_. ~ I I .y ~ _..._...__..__....----- a -- f I to { I .-.- __._ I ~ I~ eli ed e I ... y': $. $. ; 0 f e lo' ' :. .. '~ o - -_ L .. ._.. Q~ ~ ep" Alc i I iC - • ' ---- W' i ~ ~. .~ j'' ~ - - o~ ^le " ~e ego - ; ~____ j -_ . ,r I w' '°• I f' a e" e. ~ j i f Ip ems. j ~ ~'1 I ~ I,, ,. , - . - . _.. a , f f r--- 1 i ; of , • filo' oe• 012' ~ so- . ~ .. .. .1 r n e eo" ~ --__ - _ - .. .- ~ I_..._..-- Z. ~, ^ ee. ^ n Ir n n eb• n c ,n ' fb.~ --' o .1~" s - I ~-----' r i' . ~l ~ I g ~i•• Flo' I ~W I e ~'• ~. eb• L_ _-~ M• es' eG' ee" a -- --j I,•. I I . - - - ---'--~ J - ' --.. • ,. , +~'-- -_ ''~' a ~.____ t I" ~~ ~ se a ,J p -- _~~~ '~d0-t5 -- ---- ~'' a„• eF, sip- a~. ~`. -fe' ele• '~-'--'-- , - _ .. ,12' CIO' ,e' ~„~~'-~'~aG 'C'~1o- A-eb oe a ~+' end ~~ , _' e~. 9 ' I e , 8' a Irp ~' i - ---_.. _.. e10" c elh 11 eb. ~ r I -----t I ~ ---- ~ I~' - ,_ I I ~ es~ e I I I ~d- __--; ~ j c c~^ a n eN" ~, lo' e24' I I I I a n n n elp" n No ___-- I I --. _. i ~ ly" c c c d i' - - . -. I I ! I ---__-- I ... _ ._.__. ' -. .. ~ I j~j ~, I ®10' ~ ' ~ ~ j; .~ ~ I ...._-.- -_-- ~~ - -- I I ------ , ~~ I v ~I ;I! I! .• r - -- ~ ~ ~4tlt~yr, OU11adE i r 'I' I ~ _ ~ I I I, .. .:. ~ , • _- -- . -- ''~ I'~ SE~w•aLL ' --- - - - - ' --- -. _ -- -- --- --- ~' S6+.wA~L J I i - .. + \ r ' ~. ~. -~ ~GI - , ~-- i ,/ t, ~, ~ v ~ - N AS ~. .~Jo - A - / ~ A (c.. MFI~ 1= ~ ~~ ~~ ~a -- :.... C ~"~1oao" ~fAS uo-~G~~ --~ .. Best C ~y Avariable ' tl. -------- ~ ~~ e ~ ~ S' .. - - ~~. -- ------ 'o `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~~ lt1~K ~ ~O [[r.A1~l ~ ~ ~ ~A~( Mv.N(!C?G 7[ I.argiCO I . -_.-. •Q- • i`o ~ Dwra1'~+W =~.~ajY Zav;`ib Gf1r . • __... . ~ .. _. .. . .~ .E ---- •S~~ -----~-t2 _._-- - --- ~-- /aD~WAUC ~'•/ • . ._ ----_ ____~ 15' Alg_ - SP ~il r, ~ ~~o ~Ir ~ .6 . ~ ~• Yb r' ~0 _._._ . _ Irv r y, o ..4 .. ;c _. ~ 4 iiG" ~ ~ I ~P5' {~ -- ~l0' ~:6~ i ~ ~17~ ~ _ ~ ~ e G R ~~~. C o n q- ._..i._.. _..a_. .. ° ~t d ~ ~ I i i .,. v ~;; ~'- ! ~; . ,~ _..o.iz dl o , +I ~ ars' ®rs ~ ~~ ,z ~ ~( i ~i'' ^ ~+---~ ply' 8 2l f. ^ 1 1 ~.rp~ ' i ! '•J ^ - 1 ~ ' I i ~ ~. ' p e: _ _.. --- ~ -- .._.. ~ I ~ G C Gl ^ t1 C C 0 n 4.._ _ ~• ~ ' \ : ~~• 010" / t \ / ______-_11 - -._ _ ._..__ ----- ----- ~ ~~~. _ ~ --- -- . ' _ ~._ .. _ ~ , - -: - - -- - - -- - , . L ,~ -. _ _ ----~ ___~ - _- r ' ~' ~d /ieA~aeU.. ~-- __ ._ ' 9 - ----- -- -.. _, _ . --- -- ----- . (a. v7: •+'lN~ tWo-'D' '45aAelAl.l,'' - - - _ t - - ~.., --- ----- MtFlArt IuN Irac ' k~E.~ ~ 7~ ' 1'~~~ ±Z~MpVAL ~'. ` ' .as ~ .. >.o. ,' . _ or ~ ALA. Tice~+ .1~~ A~s~~c~tiirW f~we .. . ~~~ vr~leRw~ ~kl .. ~' • ~ •'1C_ ~sYWjINN'~}'bt1 is~T bi~"~.Cf~M~fd. ~, • - ?Ii34fG Ta »e l~M~YFi • 'f+~ac Nrp4u1 4i0tA1wa-' y:' ~ -: • f ..t_ .. rv~. ~•. :'~ .i , ~.. .. ;v'y;'' . ". ~ ~A~: . Bast Copy AvaHable --;; ; ^i i _.._. _ .. . _ . . 3 i __ ------^ . _ f.e _ . _ _------ -----t~---- - - _ ~ _ . -----------__ _ ._.. f ~~. _ I f ' ^,rc. ~.G..il.. ~.'8v ~,; ..,MAD ~ . •I~• ~ ' • ' ! __.._.. .__.. s .8' .io' i _ ,/ 1 ~~ • fl' •~i _.' ~__•c •N _~ ~^ ~• •IZ •Id. .. C'. ~ e* s~0a 6+b~Wh~..K ~'+,/ •ID• _ . .I? -I _. ... _ _ • _- _ _._ _..._. _ _~~. ._..___.__ I e' Id f • • ID •10' I ~ AI 1 RI~• qn. _ y- k •tr ~ 15' ,5 } fib, ~ . r - -- ;. - -- xi - ...... --' - -'r -- ...s .. _ .._. ~.._. . _ d 1 ~ •K .. --- s . _..._.. _ . __._.-____._=~__~.._._._.~_.__ i I,,. ------------' --- ,. g• il~• ~ AIZ •~ r. g* sia sla ,~ c a a' ~ m' ~ sa• i I '• Ir Isla qls' ~ I ~~ 61Z' efo" ~ • IS I .lo• ~ i ~w - . . • Is I qlz° i I ~•rs~ ~ / . ~ ~ •li'I ~ '_.__._ 't ~ { ~ k .~ ____ ry ~ n n n a c n q {s. n o a I - I e~:^ ~ . e' ~ ~ ~ u . I ~ ~--- '- ~ 312 ~ { "~,~J o4~r~i~,rcTav` ~/ _~ _. ~ 1..~ S$, !i I i MI5 ~ .1 - i fs sls ql2• ~ 12' ~ j @ .. i ~ ~ ~ ~ _. j ~I: a ~3• _ +i ~ (~~ ~~ s ~1 ! ~ ~ '.~s c~ ~ { . Ip^ ~ { ~ I 1 I ~ ; ; a ~~s.. a n n ~ c ~q ~ a q ¢!b° K x d ~ ,. _ I ~ ! ~ ; j C ° i 0~ i _I I ~ I r , N' I r ~ i•I i fig' ~ ~ y' '!"Vv~~LdE to„ b i~ I r 0 48" _ .._... - qti_ __. _ i :-1` 1 ' ~- ;r---y- - , I I i -- . . ~~' 146-~a,Jau .•, ~ ' nk 'SEA~ALt. - y - -- C- --- 1 ¢~ ~ ~ 'tifi,u?'. PM~e•tda=a. ~\ GFiJ,WA4. ~ .. Ml'~'(I1:1G ~"IE. - - ----...___.. y; _.._....-~~.-- ---- -._ - -- ASc CVO- G ~,,, „..~~ ,. . L ~L~~ ~'~ AlL 7KEtis ~ Arv~R~l;~„t ?INL ~L6Mr r;:t~tr:rt tlv;to. ' •'••- ew~~a~ ;>Q,i. Lrc+~7lr~l! D1ANQ~gK .. , ' Y-tKrss:.r b~ pr.oJSp . -. ~ • _ rase ',J*tYid /KO~fR1`r +RY,.rp^•~'. lDl •!rr,~ 1~ 1s er IewNav- .?~ b• ~ 'j11~by *r I~NI ~ ~Z . ., J f Agenda No. J~" a M E M ®~~ ~ D U M `~~ : Meefiing Date9/15/77 1"h~ City C~or~r~issiv~ of ~h~ Cifi~ ®~ Cl~~~~~~~~ SUBJECT: Rezoning of a Portion of North End of Sand Key West of Gulf Boulevard From CG to CTF-28 (City -Applicant) RECOMMENDATION: City Commission receive this application and refer it to the proper departments. ^ and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: Under City Commission direction, the Planning Department is examining properties that are not zoned commensurate with actual or probable usage. The request is for a zoning change from CG (General Business) to CTF-28 (Commercial Tourist Facilities). The Sheraton Sand Key Motel is presently developed on Tract M & B 5-1 Sec. 17-29S-15E. The South tract M & B 5-3 in Sec. 17-295-15E is presently undeveloped. The request recognizes the established and planned tourist facilities at the north end as they relate to CTF-28 zoning and the public beach development. Right-of-way for Gulf Boulevard ~s 100 feet. Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: ^ Affected Costs: N A ~,4ttachments: ~-- ~ `T~~"`~ ~ Date: Parties Funding Source: Application ~- Notified ^ Capital Improve- Drawing City Manager Paper: of Meeting ment Budget ^ Operating Budget ~ ~N01 Re wired 4 Not Re wired q ^ Other f G 7 (D IQ~~I~ inatin Department: Ori g g Date & Sequentia I Appropriation Code Reference Planning O None ~i ,~ ,~ `. APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT BGTH HEARINGS ~~~ APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONI:dG ; CFile in triplicate at office of City Cler::. Attach 3 copies o` plat to scale shocain~ location and dir..ensions of subject property and 3 copies ofcertified survEy. Proof of oemership requirements attached hereto. Fee to be paid at time of filing of application.) DATE August 8, 1977 OWNER OR OWNERS NAI~,E(S) William K. Cash et ux, 1500 N.W. 16th Ave. a nsv e, or a Sand Key Assoc. Ltd. Partnership, 1160 Gulf Blvd., Clearwater Beach, F1.33515 ADDRESS PHONE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CIF ANY) Applicant - City ADDRESS PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF REQUEST) M & B 5-3, Sec. 17-29S-15E and Sec. 20-29S-15E; M & B 5-1, Sec. 17-29S-15E GENERAL LOCATION West of L".R. 208 (Gulf Blvd.) adjacent to park on the north end of Sand Key PRESENT ZONING- CG DESIR..~'D ZONING CTF,28 A'CR£AGE : (per zone request('s ) 3~SDiV` FOR REQUEST To reflect current usage and planned tourist facilities at the north end of Sand Key. LIST ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED Planning Office only Date Recd. P E Z Case No. Item Date Action ~ Recom. Date Fwd. ~~t~t~~~~~~~~~~R~~~~~t~~-~~~~~tst~t~r~i~r~~~~~~~~~r*~~~r~~~t,t~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ Clerk's Office only Recd. py Date Advt. P ~ Z Date Corua. Date s.. - M11 • ~i_ O a ° ~ -oa ~ Q ~ aQe. .ti ,~e 4 a Isal Q aac 4 o/ 0 ti ~=O ~p0 f N' f - 3a0• .. ~~( ~ '-. .. ~ ,. v L 7.~t 4 ~ ~. a ,a a..,l~ ~a`an ' ~a~* ~ ~ wa ,, \ ~~ Q 0 Q 1 Q. ~ 0 ~. ~~ ~m i O EXCEPT A ALL ZONI SHALL TE LINE, SU( CEATIFIEi USE OF SEAWARD (AS DEFIN TO THE Cl LAND (AL) , INCLUDES, TiVEEN T}I F~nALLEL DISTANCE 0 4 ~ a ~ 'ZS r 4 C= O 4~ " ~ ~ O O ~ V ~ ~ J~ ~ ,°j t~ .~- Q : ;~ .~ -~ ~ r ~ - ~ ~ O ~ ~ ,. n __. .~ . _ - ---... LEGEND V =Vacant Pkg =Parking _ ~ Single Family ~ 8~= Business I, Duplex Q = Muiti-Family ~I PROPERTY . Scale Refer Atlas Pnge. ~_~ ~s•3 ~~ -- - - - - - - - ---- 1 3 y= 200 Sec. ~~#ZoTwp. 29 Rge. ~ 5" ANNEXATION & ZONING I REZONING ~. . - ""- -- Owner/Applicant: SEE !~T'I" RC.N~A PU8L1C NEARING ITEA,! N0. ~ j From : G G ~ AGENDA No. ~ DATES ~ ~ To: C, -- ~: PLANNING BOARD N CITY COM14!iSSION i .......a-.~._ ~~ r ~~ ~ Agenda No. /~" ,~~'' .. M E M ~ ~~ ~ ®U~M T®• Meeting Dater-15-7 The City Cor~rr~issi®n ®~ the City ®f Ciear~~ter SUBJECT: Rezoning of a portion of Sand Key West of Gulf Boulevard from CG to RM-28 (City -Applicant) RECOMMENDATION: City Commission receive this application and refer it to the proper departments. ^ And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: Under City Commission direction, the Planning Department is examining properties that are not zoned commensurate with actual or probable usage. The request is fora zoning change from CG (General Business) to RM-28 (Multi-Family High Density). Sand Key Condominium I and II, Harbor Light Towers, Sand Key Club and Landmark Towers are existing. The remainder of the property is vacant. This application recognizes the existing high density uses and future development as the established pattern on Gulf frontage. Right-of-way for Gulf Boulevard is 100 feet . Commission Disposition: y. Follow-up Action: `~.~ ;~ Submitted by: Advertised: ^Afferted Costs: NSA Attachments; ~s.4+~~ :z°~ i~-~ Date: Parties Notified Funding Source: ^ Capital Improve- Application City Manager Paper: of Meeting ment Budget Drawing ^ Operating Budget of Required Not Required ^ Other (~ ~~ / ®~~~/ inatin De artment: Ori g g p Daie aSequential Appropriation Code Reference Planning ^ None . #^ ~ ~~ ~~~.. r .. APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONI:dG ,, , ~'.`~ (~ ile i n triplKate at Off iCe of C1ty Cler::. Attach 3 COD1eS of pi3t to scale shocain~ location and d=r:ensions of subject property and 3 copies ofcertified survey. Proof of ocanership requirements attached hereto. Fee to be paid at time of filing of application.) DATE August 8, 1977 OWNER OR OWNERS NAME(S) Se® attached list ADDRESS PHONE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CIF ANY) Applicant - City of Clearwater ADDRESS PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF REQUEST) M & B 1 Sec. 19-29S-15E less property lying east of'C.R. 208 (Gulf Blvd.) a-~ esg R.fl.W. nor C.R. 208; Sand Ke Condo South Beach I1 P1. Bk. 20 P 35; M b B 1-7 ®c. - - an y on out eac g. ear- rWSter Sand Key Club Condo No. 1 P1. Bk. 19, P 2I-32; M ~ B 1-9 S®c. Light Towels Condo P1. Bk. 18 Fg.-I-13; Pl. Bk. 21ePg. 1-13; M ~~B 1-3 Sec. I9-29S-15E and Sec. 20-29S-15E• M ~ B 5-S,.Sec i9-29S-15E & Sec. 20-29S-15E; Landmark Towers Condo P~. Bk. 20 Page 19=30 GENERAL LOCATION Sand Rey - West of C.R. 208 (Gulf Blvd.) PRESENT ZONING CG T~ESIR~z'D ZO;iING RM-28 ~QaC2~AGE : ( per zone request C s ) SEASON FOR REQUEST To reflect current usage and to bring into compliance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan.. ,; LIST ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED Planning Office only Date Recd. P ~ Z Case No. Iter 7 Date Action Recom. Date Fwd. • t ft~tsti'.~~k~t~k~lt7~r~tsfR3t~~~t~k~~l~*~~dltoitil~~#t~t:tat#~~~ts'ra4iF~r~l~sl~~c~lsiti~~t~k~tst~~lt~st~~~ts'~~~r~~s~~ ~s1t3 Cler?c's Office only R.ci . c.~y t. P ~ z Date Advt . P ~ Z Date Co;:ua. Date ~~ ii APPLICANT OR REP ENTATIVE MUST BE PRESEN~ BOTH HEARINGS a -` . :~ 0 4 ~' L 0 AL 0 V • PROPERTY: 0 AL a ,; ~~~;, `~ ~ W ~ ~~~ I• i~S/ Y O I ~ W 2 ~ a~ a> ~ m '~ ~- ~~ ,~, 1=~ ANNEXATION d ZONING / FtEZONiNG PUBLlC HEARING 1TEM N0. - - AGENDA No.i DATES PLANNING BOARD CITY COMMISSION LEGEND V =V~car.t pky =Parking ® Single Family a= Business Duplex [~ =Multi-Family Scale Refer Atlas Page=-~-K-3 z=~ 200 Sec.i't,~g,ZaTwp. 29 Rge. I S ~. I Owner/Applicant: 51=E A ~ ~AC~'~7 ,.. ~ ~, From: a~ To: R~=28 N ~ .- /~ E, • Agenda No. /~ ~ . ~ ®~~ ~ ®U M T®~ Meeting Date~~~s~~~ ~ The City Cora mission of the City of Clearwater S U B J ~CT ~ Rezoning of Sand Key West of Gulf Boulevard adjacent to the South Cit limits from CG to CTF 28 Cit -A licant RECOMMENDATION: City Commission receive this application and refer it to the proper departments. D And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: Under City Commission direction the Planning Department is examining properties that are not zoned commensurate with actual or probable usage. The request is for a change in zoning from CG (General Business) to CTF 28 (Commercial Tourist Facilities). The North portion of this tract is developed as the Bellview Biltmore Swim Club. The South portion is undeveloped. The Hotel-Motel recreational demands at the South end of Sand Kev and similar uses in Belleair Beach are recognized. Right-of-way for Gulf Boulevard is 100 feet. Commission Disposition: Foll:~w-up Action: ,, , , ~; Submitted by: Advertised: ^Affec#ed Costs: NSA ®Attachments: /~ ,~ /,' ~. ~ Date: Parties if Funding Source: Application G~~ Not ied D Capital Improve- Drawing City Manager Pooer: of Meeting ment Budget ~ Operating Budget ~` ~ Not Required ®Not Required 0 Other Q_ 7~~ /QO l ?- Originating Department: Date a Sequential Appropriation Code Reference Planning ~ None ~+ ~' APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT BOTH HEARINGS ~,~~ APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZOVIidG (File in tr.plicate at office of City Cler::. Attach 3 commies o` plat to scale shocaing location and dirensions of subject property and 3 copies of certified survey. Proof of oc-mership requirements attached hereto. Fee to be paid at time of fitin~ of application.) DATE August 8, 1977 OWNER OR OWNERS NAME(S) B. F. Powell et aI ADDRESS Belleview Biltmore hotel Co. pHONE A licant - -Cit AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) PP y ADDRESS PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF REQUEST) M & B 17 in Section 30-29S-15E; M & B 2 Section 19-29S-15E GENERAL LOCATION Sand Key West of C.R. 208 (Gulf Blvd.) adjacent to south city limits of Clearwater - FRESENT ZONING CG DESIR.~'D ZO?`IING CTF 28 ACREAGE: (per zone request(s) REASON FOR REQUEST To reflect current usage and recognize hotel - motel recreational demands at the south end of Sand Rey adjacent to similar uses in Belleair. LIST ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED Planning Office only Date Recd. P E Z Case No. Date Action Recom. Item # Date Fwd. i~~~le#~k~ts'#~~'e3ts~xr~r:t~~ts~~it*~~r~i~st~~~*~F~r~:t~*~lrsts~~k~r~tst~~~'a~e~litst~t~:~s4~st~3stit~~rsl~~~e~s3~ ~~e3 Clerk's Office only Recd. Cooy to P ~ Z •~ C ~ ~~~ y / ~ ) Date Advt. P ~ Z Date Comra. Date i ,,; • ~ LEGEND V =Vacant Pkg =Parking PROPERTY: • Sing{e Family B~= Business Duplex Q = Muiti-Family Scale Refer Atlas Page K-3 1 « -- - ----- --- - - --- -- - - ---- - - - 2= 200 Sec. {q~3oTwp. 29 Rge. i5 ANNEXATION & ZONING / REZONING _~ Owner/Applicant: sEE ~ATTAC~t£D PUBLIC NEARING ITEM NO. ~ ~~-~ -- _ _______ "' C G ~ ? From: AGENDA No. DATES N m To: G~ F PLANNING BOARD CITY COMMISSION y Agenda No. ®~'°'~ ~ ®~i~ ~ D U M ~o ~ Meeting Date: _ _ Thy Co~~o C~r~rnissi®~ ®fi the Cif ®f C9~ara~~r Y SUBJECT' Rezoning of a portion of Sand Key East of Gulf Boulevard d • a jacent to the southern city limits from CG to RZZ-28 RECOMMENDA~'ION: City Commission receive this application and refer it to the proper departments. D And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: Under City Commission direction, the Planning Department is examining properties that are not zoned commensurate with actual or probable _ usage. The request is fora zone change from CG (General Business) to RM-28 (Multi-Family Residential) The Isle of Sarid Key Condominium is developed on a portion of the property and the remainder is vacant. This request is made to reflect current usage and bring the zoning. into compliance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Right-of-way-for Gulf Boulevard is 100 feet. Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: D Affected Costs: i~~A Attachments; ~~ ~~~ ' Date: Parties Funding Source: ~~ ~~ ~s_ Notified ^ Capital Improve- Application City Manager Paper: of Meeting ment Budget Drawin g ~ Operating Budget y Not Required Not Re wired q ^ Other 7 ~~Qg~/~ 0 inating Department: Ori g Date & Sequentia i Appropriation Code Reference Planning ^ None r~ ~ ' ~ ' .' `APPLICANT OR REPRE EAtTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT BOTH HEARINGS 1 ~ APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONIidG (File in triplicate at office of City Cler:;. Attach 3 copies o` plat , to scale shocaing ? ocation and dir..ensiens of subject property and 3 copies ofcertified survEy. Proof of ocanership reYuirenents attached hereto. Fee to be paid at time of filing of application.). DATE August $, 1977 OWNER OR OWNERS NAMECS) B. F. Powell et al and Guardiaa Mortgage Ineestment Trust et al ADDRESS PHONE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CIF ANY) Applicant - City ADDRESS PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF REQUEST) :3 & B 17-1, ~i ~ B 17-2, M ~ B 17-3 all in Section 30-29S-15E; Iale of Sand Key Condo I, P1. Bk, 19 Pg. 88; M & B 2-2 Sec. 19-29S-1SE and Sec. 30-29S-ZSE; M 6 B 2-1, Sec. I9-29S-lSE GENERAL LOCATION Sand Rey ~~et-of C.R. 208 adjacent to the southern city limits. PRESENT ZONING CG DESIRED ZONING ~-23 ACREAGE: (per zone request(s) BEASON FOR REQUEST To reflect the current usage and bring into compliance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. LIST ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED Planning Office only Date Recd. P ~ Z Case Nom. Item Date Action ~ Recom. Date Fwd. s~~~e~~~~r~r~r~r~~~:~~~r~~r*~~s~~~~s~~e~~~~r~~~~t~t~~r~r~~~~~~~~~~#~t~~~r~t~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ Clerk's Office only_ Recd. Co y to P ~ Z ~ C1~~ -~~/-~Y/7 2 Date Advt.' P E Z Date Comm. Date ~_ ..._. ,_ 1 J•3 I goo T /SS/ er y ~,,.. /~ .. `:~ . . ';3... G °J ~m I - /'• ...... :.` ..; i ~ .. ,' 1 LEGEND V =Vocan# Pkq =Parking A Single Family 8~= Business Duplex Q =Multi-Family PROPERTY: Scale Refer Atlas Page 4C-3 . 3 ~i ! -- - -- - - - - - - --- - _. -- - - -- - - ~ = 200 Sec.i9$3oTwp. 29 Rge. 15_ ~ ANNEXATION & ZONING /.REZONING Owner/Applicant: StE ATTAINED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM N0. -~~ __ _ t~ a>' From: C G AGENDA ~Na. DATES o m T0~ RN1 - 28 PLANNING 60ARD N ~ CITY COMMISSION ! ,o~" - - - EXCEP? _ ALL Z ". _ = SHALL LINE, CEAT11 ' uSE ~ ' .. SEAWA (0.S D! '" TO THI ~.• tAW. • ALL l OF M~ OF ME. • Agendo No. ~~"~~ E ®~IQ ~ D U M '~'~ ~ Meeting Date~~ls/~~ The City C®nn~issi®n ®f the City.®f Cle~rv~~ter SUBJECT: Rezoning of properties on Sand Key East of Gulf Boulevard from CG to RM 16 (City-Applicant) RECOMMENDATION City Commission receive this application and refer it% to the proper departments. ^ And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SAC6CGROUNO: Under City Commission direction, the Planning Department is examining properties that are not zoned commensurate with actual or probable use. The request is for a change in zoning from CG (General Business) to RM 16 (Multi-family medium density). Bayside Gardens I, II, III and IV are developed as multi-family within the RM 16 zone density. The tracts directly South and Pdorth of Bayside Gardens II and Bayside Gardens IV are currently vacant but should continue the pattern•of primarily medium density zoning on the Bayside of Sand Key. Gulf Boulevard right-of-way is 100 feet. Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: ^ Affected Costs:.sIJA ~lAttachments: ~ .~~ Date.: Parties Notified Funding Source: ^ Capital Improve- Application Drawing City Manager Paper: of Meeting ment Budget ~ Operating Budget ®Not Required ®Not Required ^ Other ~~~ 7~~~/~ 7 Originating Department: Date aSequential Appropriation Code Reference Planning ^ None e A "~ APPLICANT OR REP ~tTATIVE MUST BE PRESEN~ BOTH HEARINGS APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONIidG (File in tri~ licate at office of City Cler;:. Attach 3 copies of plat to scale shocaing location and d?r.:ensions of subject property and 3 copies vf' certified survey. Proof of ownership requirements attached hereto. Fee to be paid at time of filing of application.) ~^.t DATE August 8, 1977 OWNER OR OWNERS NAME(S) U.S. Steel and Bayside Gardens I, II, III and IV, .Condominium Owners (See .Attached List) ADDRESS PHONE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) Applicant - City of Clearwater ADDRESS Bk. 12 pg. 88; Sand 10; v ar a v, v...v • ai , r,rv, a.i..., vcasa~a a~i.~ vvaa~av a+c.~ va~ac. vcaa aa.-raav a. , a. a. Bk. 19, Pg. 16; M ~ B 5 Sec. 20-29S-15E and Sec. 17 -29S-15E less the north 417' M,O.L. (See attachment) GENERAL LOCATION East side of Couaty Road 208, Sand Key PRESENT ZONING CG DESIRED ZO~iING RM-16 ACREAGE: (per zone requests) REASON FOR REQUEST To reflect current usage and reflect a continued pattern of medium density on the Bayside of Sand Key. LIST ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED Planning Office only Date Recd. P ~ Z Case No. Item Date Action Recom. Date Fwd. ~lslt~l~~~ikikitx:t~it~4~~ts~ t~l~~39t~skst!l~k~lt~yt~k3~~lr~~r~lt~r~lt~~t~~tlfrsl~k~t~ls~it~~~rs~~~lr~~sl~~~~s2~ ksk3 Clerk's O/ff ice only Recd . ~y!X ~~ ~ copy to P ~ Z ~~~ ~ ~~/~5` ~77 PHONE Date Advt. P E Z Date Corua. Date LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF REQUEST} M & B 1 less that part west of C.R. 208 (Gulf Blvd and R.O.W. for C.R. 24 n ect on , Township 29S, Range 15E; Sand Key Condo Bayside Gardens II Pl. Bk. 13, - ec. - an ey ono ays a ar ens , s . I PROPERTY: f II _. .. ...~._~_ ___-__...--- -.~__._ - , 111 A.NNEX~ATlO~N a ZONING/ REZONING ~ PU8L1C HEARING ITEM N0. •- AGEIVOA No. DATES PLANNING 80ARD CITY COMMISSION v~Y ... .., - A L • ~ ~~° `~ C o } ,~. `. r ` ~ ./ ~ •~-• Z N 0 • r \ + ` ~' ~ My ,J f M 1! } ~ ..ll L :` S a a .. . ..Q 4~: ~ , O"VO j y O@ ~ /. 4 w W0Q N ~ V ~ l... ~, . ` Y' a ~: .~ ti r C [ • O a ~ r( r 2 ~ • ~ , ias V ~ •// • { 3 ~. ~__ ~ _ ./v YM _. Q\ Sw t =y Wt a ~ 1/!I I.t ~<^ v V ~ A. (W 1; ~{L aic ~ 'aP~ i// S „ W } .~ W 1. ~ a W} . QY4 N b a W~3 ~ V V L ~ i _ e ~i~kj m Y 3 ~ ~ E ~ : _- ~ a~ Al ~ ~~ - ~ _ . w ....... _ . E ~ r ,~--- -- :~~; o o W ~ ~ o ' . p w . - - _ ~ ~ -_ _. - _... ~ ff ~ ~ ~~ ` AL . ~~ ~_ e ~ ~.~ - ... ~„=d 3-~ r k ~ - ~ & ~~ ~ ~. ; ;. ' r' ~~- ~ ~~ - ~ l~ ~ ~ , h f ' ~ _ ----- ~ ~- _ ~ - LEGENO V =V~cnr,t Pky =Pcrktnq .. ~ _ ® Sinq{e Family 8~= 8uslness ' _ . _ AL Duplex L~ = Muii1-Family ~ ~•. - .:.~ Scale Refer .Atlas Page ~ C G 3 ~~ g= 200' Sec. 'io Twp. 2~{ Rge. t 5 ~ ---- •~J - -- -- - -. - ,,,. Owner/Applicant: SEE ~R?TX}GKE17 _. .. _..__. __ ; _._- a, From: ~` ~' C G N ~ _ _ i CLEA,.J~W,A.'TE~'f. SUFI Pubilahad Daily Clearwater, Pinellas Countp, 1•lhrlda °.?'A?E OF FLO111DX COUNTY OF PINELLJ1St before the undersigned authotftp p@tsonalfy appearad 1fV. Paul Harris, who on oath says that he 1s the Business Manager of the Clearwater Sun, a daily newspaper published at Clearwater in PInellas Countp, Florida: that the attached espy of advertisement, being a . ,Notice Of Pub11C He~,r.ng ............. . .. . . in the matter taf ~.~meilc~•irig ~ of ~ city ~ zoning, , on. propert~i.. E.. , of.. Gulf , Blyd; . .... . Iess• ~t'sle 'o~~ ~ Sand ~ Key? Condo No: l etc ~r~~ .........~X?~3C~C~XXXXXXXX ..................}L}{$to~~, vrai published in ~atd newspaper In tl~a ic6uss of :.. ; ..QC.tQb.er..6,. , .197.7• :................:. Attiant further saps that the said Clearwater Sun is a newspaper publishod at ~learwatar, in raid Pinellas Cpuntp, Florida, and that the said newspaper -bas hetetofor• been continuouslp published In wid Plnellaa Countp, Florida, each dap and has been entsrod as aecpnd class mail matter at the post otfle• in Clearwater, !n said Plnellaa Countp, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publica4lon of 'he attached copy of advertisement; and atHant Furth says t b• ha neither paid nor promiked any psfaon, firm ar ebrperation anp,diseo nt at , eomm sion or refund for the pur~oae of securing thU .advertisement for, p cg~o in t13e~d ri~spaper. Sworn to and aubaeribe~ beFere >i,s thfr• ~~, dap Of Ober.:: X.D. ls.'):]. ~~ NOTARY PUB bTE of -,. .'- ~~`, ~ CIC;*ST FLORIDA at LA11uiE" :': ~,.4~ ~. • . , .......:.. MY COMtAiS5lON [Xt~IRCS MAY 13, 1&8Y (SEAL) ~~ ;' otary Pubtic 90NDEA TkU h'.•P!G°AL If7S. UNBERWRlTf,A! ii ~\ ~ Cr5'-?n9 ~~ 1h1 .j '~ ~" r' C ~ .E ~R .~. i. a "w t ,y I ~ r '.t t I r, ~ ~ ~ _, r ~'',. ° i, y r 1.,y. 'y ~~. ~ CAI.. `1 F r I '~ ,.., h,, ~: 1 y ,t, ~ 4 1 ~~. ~ ,~y~ 1". P ~ :` 1L~ 5 ~~ ~ ~~ %~ 1 ~'_ < a . I ~ ~ 1~ ~" U±~ 1 ~ • " ~ ~ i ~~ ~ t r „~ t ~ ..•I ~' ~ ~ si ~ ~~ p .4 Y y , i -, D . ,~ tt 6 ~, t ~"y5. , s ~ u j i >'r n,.~. L~,"Fh a. ~ b~ (k,!. ~i S ~`~F~Yt"' 1 a Y }~,'; ~ ~'L7(.~ ~. ~ t~ ~ 1 4w 411 e Y ~°s! t Y.~~_~ `°'~tl. ?.Y~.#J iar~f, ~` aj.`~ r ~ i.5" s ~ 7, ~ ' ~ ~ ~ k ~~~ JN~~, f >,~-fr fY ~ ~+ « z aLrr y'~ 1,~, ,~~, '~~ `' r ~ to Y1 rY~~ a > ~ c j 1 ~ n < ti 1- 7 ~ ~..,k '1 ~ °' ~~ {t1 ~~~' 11 t tit f.S" t- ~.., l`. `',3 ~; ~ I 2 ~rR •,.,.J,~4 1 q l,I t~I Jtt y l ~ t ~ . ~, I Z h ~ ~E 1. r' ~ y rE '~~7~ j~~~, I I ., I 1 ? 1 ~~ r I err ~. ~ ~ ~; r ~ a ~'; e ~ r r,~ ~1>-r.1 Ir r rrS ~ ~ ~.. 1 1 31 c~ ~ 1 r -~ - s ti ~+ e PS u° t ' t I ~ >,~~. t 1 ~ 4 f ~ ~ fl~ ~ r ~' ~ ~ I r ~ ° t p ~ Y 1 r ' Fret ~~~ ~~~ ~~ a ,. 4 s' Y , I t . ~' it 1 r ~. a ~ T ~ ' ~ I I ~ .d i ~P f t h _ 1 F~ Sri 4~t~+J r . r ~~ ,.r I t y~ , ,~,, ~ ~ w1 ®ir~'vat r~ ~ ~ , ~y Te 4 r C 1'i~f ~~ ~° '<w'-,~~7 iq~,~ ~ ~ °~~ : ~ ap 4. { I ~ 1. • 9 ~ t y ~} ~ ~ 1~ ~'ol~~~ r''4~ 2r~ 1 . ~~. , t ~ ~iti I'. q I ~ ~ ~~ y, y~y ~y ;,'.~'rfyl ~ C VI tC~` ~~L~k~ ~~e4k ~ *n _ 7P+AAM r , ~ ~ f ~_r , ~,r,v.. t,~{~ ~, µ,_ , .._. r .° ROBERT J. McDERMOTT ATTOEIVEY AT LAW • ~o~ d1~o~r.E~i erEa~afEZ -LRZyO 120ad 1,'az9o, ~~oztda 33540 ~e~ep~ione (813 584-8624 October 14 , 19 77 Mr. Frank H. Morris, Jr., Chairman Mrs. Sallie Parks, Vice-Chairman Mr. Arthur M. Kruse, Chairman Emeritus Mrs. Jeanne Crampton Mr. William Turner Mr. Howard Groth Mr. Rick Hall Mr. John Kuntz Mr. George Tice Sitting and Acting as the Planning and zoning Board of the City of Clearwater 112 S. Osceola Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33518 Re: Down-zoning of Sand Key Club Restaurant from GS (Business) - Owner:. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo by foreclosure - Zoning hearing: October 18, 1977 at 1:30 P.M. Commission hearing: November 3, 1977 at 12:30 P.M. Gentlemen: This .office represents First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo. Objection is hereby made to the down-zoning above re- ferred to as it applies to the Sand Key Club Restaurant located at 1370 Gulf Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida. First Federal of Largo in 1976 was instrumental in causing the law suit to be dropped against the City of Clearwater which was filed-by Mr. Rebholz who lived in the Sand Key Club condominium and asserted in that suit several short comings by the City in connection with zoning. w • Planning and Zoning Board of the - City of Clearwater -Page 2 October 14, 1977 This counsel worked along with attorney tZarybeth Lavallee, Assistant City Attorney, confer"ring with her and advising _: her with respect. to.appropriate- procedural steps to ac- . compl'ish dismissal of the-suit, along with providing the "`City Attorney's Office with sufficient documentation ":signed by First Federal Savings and Loan Association of 'Largo, Guardian Mortgage Investors, Sand Key Yacht and ,Tennis Club,. Inc., et al to bring zoning in compliance so that the said suit could be dismissed. In fact, First _ Federal of Largo insisted that then ~abuld not -deal with .Sand Key Club and Sand Key Yacht and Tennis Club, Inc. or ,. ' '. others in executing the instruments unless 'f rst the suit against the City of Clearwater was dismissed. For this co-operation the City of Clearwater acting with .full knowledge that the Club was used as a public restaurant. and was intended in the future to be used as a public restaurant, passed a resolution at the request of this counsel on January 6,. 1977 specifically approving that the restaurant facilities would meet the zoning require- ments.giving First Federal of Largo the distinct and clear view-that .there-were no further prohibitions it. would have . to deal with to utilize the facility<as a public restaurant facility. The present down-zoning would be a departure -from the agreement and full faith and credit of the City ~~ .wh.i.ch was relied upon in implementing the dismissal of the -suit above referred to. Conceivably a different view could be .taken by First Federal of Largo if the land was roacant., however, being an improved tract with the restaurant facility already located on the said. tract and it being apparent that the highest and best use" is that of a. restaurant facility to preclude this use as a public restaurant. would b.e a tremendous hardship upon the present owner and would cause the present owner sub- stantial damage all of which was intended to be circum- vented by its prior agreements with the City. First Federal of Largo attaches to this protest and objection the minutes of the City of Clearwater meeting of January 6, 1977 along with letter of January .5, 1977 referred to~in - .said resolution and also letter of December 15, 1976 re- ceived December. l7, 1976 by the Planning Department over the s.gnature.of Marybeth Lavallee, Assistant City Attorney. s ~ -- ~ _ «' Planning and Zoning Board of the City of- Clearwater Page 3 October 14, 1977 - ' -_` - -,. .Kindly-receive tTis objection to the down-zoning. in ac- cordance with the rules of the Zoning Board with the specific request that. exception be made specifically as to the. Sand Key Club as t:~is was obviously intended by the City Commission to be able: to be utilized as a public restaurant incident to the Savings and Loan`s - agreements with the City-and the implementation of the dismissal of the Rebholtz law suit.. `Respectfully submitted, ^ ~tG/fLG ~~Z-tai-d''"~-'i~ /~ - Robert.- J. i~cDermott - .Attorney for First. Federal Savings and Loan Association of Largo RJI~I : cb , - cc: NIr. Robert 6V. Fox ialr. Darwin L. Robart I~ir:. [~illiam Kelshaw~-- ~~•~ j ~~~ ~. ~ ~ :Z . i r• `~ r i.:: a t~ _ E_. Q ~' % `= Y : ` 7 l' ._ v (_ "tl 1'1 ~ ~. O r (~ ~ I., ~? . _ C~ - ` ~~ ry ^7 J l.:.'.? j t~ ~ ... J .L r .'". ( .s '_ C ti ~ _~.'.1 F.1 L' ~ :::~ ~ a:~ i i i -J ) i. C !a ~= T ~. . :' C (~ 7 ~ (~ j ;. `:~. 4.1 ' r; C` : ` • s:` ._ i'. G v ': 1 t7 ii __ c'1 ~ . _ G i? i I? <:1 1: ~ }1 !?~~ C' a~ 3'-"'-``-f=-~' p~._ t 7 t) C'. .~ U L' i cl ? t :.: C L .: ~(-? t_ G _ G 4 ~ ' ~ . .~ 1 ~ t' i"~~ L. ~~ ~~ i~ i. f) '^" ~1 C ~f :~^s~-...~`~:^'.'..:i ~ i1 C:: :i t~ ~ C __ C:... C7 -t .,--,_ - ~ -~ --,,!: t`.~ 1. O ~ .. L ~- P1 : ~ i 3 i. C i. 1 i C ~ .,. t_ ! ~ u ~ _ O Y? u `~~ % (,'v:1T;? _:~:-: :.LtJIlr_'?' i'~.'a`_~ ._11? i~t0'IC~. 'L"fl vCCC~ ~ `{: }; f_ t, e:. ::1 :. O r" i;.<1' ..: C? ~ c: ~ 't ;:i (; YZ t. r_ .,i v ~ r~ '= C'~. i it ~ cn. ~ i C'., :~ :1 ci r C Cj ..~ <.. %1 11 r1 L ~ ~ ~ S % i / _ `~'. ~ f ~` .. -_ :1 f.1 :~..'. ~ ~ u C l i 'i:sl T3 .'.} " :Z Y.... 3 !a. L ?:) ~ ! n C o ~ ~ T": ''a ~: fl 1 .._ ±- ^ ~: ~ ~: !.:~ E::." ,_. ~_ \~ W ' t Z :: E1 : ; t1 !.. !J c7 Y3 .1 C :~ 7 r ~ c7 t_ ~ ^ O i ~_ Ct. i ~ :) ~ ti ~ R C it i:_ (i ~ C, ~' 7 i } ri ~~\ / _. _ .>. !: . °_ :) .'= ... t CS ~ ~.. c.a ~ t_ L . a d _ __ L _ '1 ':~ _ _... i1 ~ ~ _•• r: ~ .. n ~ u. i::I": F_' :1 ,. ,.. -. , ._. C R +'!'. "' ,_.._ 1.~'.Q _. __ Lilf~..V ~ Q~,:..cn..~ v, ~}]C.~: E::'a°_ Y ~ ._::..._... iiti a _ i:n ~.., ~_. ~)._._ , ,:1 a: f' '. _...4: ~..._1 __?C ._.C):___It~ ~%aC; c_'il: Ci:~]t... ~"C1L` _:J _. _..'i:_ i V.... _. .. ,.. _ ~ ._ .. L to .,.. i.+ E.% :-:?ii :j. C~ .:~ ~ V ? i i3 ') y 3 -~ O y`T t,?T_~ :~ T) GS ... ^_ - c't..~~___._.__r_~~~ t. ~i: ;~~..r'~" .__`~ _...~ ._ .. i~ ~.. _ .'- ~ -.._.. ti ~,~ i~C'~'_ III? .:.Ui:-_;1~"-_ 'U.L :1 {~~ ~----___. :. .. :t ... ~ __ _ ... ~1; :'"lj`}~e.. _ L '_ `J :~. .'' ~ "' C ci _ s:~ C~ E? C1 .! t~ ? e.. i...: S..:) .... ? i , '_ ! ... is ' n ~, ,~ •~ •' .i ._ L ,..~i ;~ .. LI ~ ._ C W ~i. .~ : .: ~: ~l :. cl C ~ G :: 9 i_ .. '~ :^ i ,) r tJ (~ 1,: r' C_' „ .~ J :. ,~ ^~- ., i~ . i , . ~._ _.: }= tj -~' L .3 L:. O x ~L:.: i1 d C~ __cl'S~1 a ?~? ~'i ... ;.i i ej '_ d :S D :° O L !? .. ~' e:z :. ~. .: :' . ,t _ .:3`._ :. ... ~s l O1" IZ}'.cn»i:~ vt;li j E?Cl: L!J a=O:1Clii ~ c°!^. C; ~J~% !_!:1~_i:.'~s `! J _~_..~:.:~ I J 6.. _ t ~ .__ r- r i i ~ `• ~, hrl .a E7:~r~ ~:~{i :.t _ ^ '; ~.:i .: a '~ - 71 ~ >~ "" S L iu C . '~. ti. .z ~ E }1 fJ ~. G C'_ i° ~ i l'..Y . C_ :-1 _ °J ~_ ~'`..l~ ii _..~....v._.'y"' gL.fl ~}12 ii .1°.:}~ 4'u~?~C'.~.:'Lix`.j a%~?~!. `t^~' t~'+;~i G+...._ :: C) is11~ ~~~;?"uC`'•~o ~.Ol'1IIli,;~:~01'1C'-~ 1`~i3T11.Z SG't.Ui?CIeG %fIC'_ i.iCJ~:!_OY?., ii ::S,_''i::'i: ~'''~~ .r ~_ ~. ~'~ I ._ '--~.. °"._"~- ^s!~Y'~~Ca~_~~. E'- r'° (j 17.3 ~ a ~. % :...1 :? 7?.~--,? Tl ~_^ ......_._Z.,-~` -.i? - ,`;'!? :.. .. ,'. ~ ?-~ ~.. ;,:'n0?,;~-~?~~ ~edn__.~*3_.u,n, tJJtL2~7Q3::~ ~iYT_?2 v_ L._F' .. ... :. C7 ?;i_°_'t=L a? • _ ~J a. L 1 F.A..J ' <.1 ~ S ~ 1 ~ J a. cM I: ~_ i..~.. 1~ 1 •~.~.. Gj t_ l l .a.. ~~ t _' C''.. . t ~a ._ :" ..~.. a.. ! 7 n 1 J f1 J 11 .. - ,_. u _... ... .,, .o _.... .... .. _:. v.ns .C; ~.:O~C:, ~?_£~G~ it :i '.,.G~}. ii v7:ia tt -r. '-v'4'... ._. r..i J. .. .._ . - > :!~ Q _ a ~ c_ n C3 ~} ~ s''_ sf 7'} r; `" s:3 . :.; .. e ~ G :_ ~., J .: _ .. ,._ .. _ ., _ . 1 }+: CZ: lcy, u `.~ ~_; ~ . "7 ' .n~. :~ fl :1 ~ i7 :i. G? ._ _.... t~ ii -~ ., .... `" ~. C .: .. ~? o "' ... ... ":' _............_ `~f. u_ .:_ ~ .. .. __ .. J _ .. .. ... ....._~.._`,'~, '3.`:C u,..~%P'~ :1~? ta':3t3lf!. ~C?:..Cs t~; 4; '+ -~ ~ :? _ ._.__...._._ .....^~'..:: .._ ~ _ _. ... .._ :S ~ ._ . .. ... _ ..~.~.^~ZQ:? Sri i^a .?' n'rl -'1 ' :; .... .° '. .. ~ .. _: ... .:.~... . .__.. °.t`n'a nV^_!~i_t! !~Cczt.~11i? ~_'4:__?'tc.tCC' .. ' JJv~ .. .._ _.. ...... _ ..! __ ... '.'~. J ._ .. a _ _ . .. _ _ .. .. _ ... .. j ~ .~ _ _ ~ .J "._ v .. _.... J ._ ... .. _ ~ _ _ ._ _ _ _ ._ ....i ~ ..J ~ .... it c... .. _ _ - _ .. .. O <_L .~ :.~ {. ;~ ?_ :.~' ... ,.. .._ .., ._ ... .... ..+ _. _ .... . _ .._ _ _.._ 1. ~! n LAW OFFICES RICHARDS, NODINE, GILKEY, FITE, MEYER & THOMPSON, P. A. RE~~~ti'r~ RICHARDS BUILDING 1253 PARK STREET OV/ ~~ ~~~~ RALPH RICHARDS .CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33516 - WILLIAM E.NO DINE WILLIAM W. GILKEY (813)443-3281 ~T~T7~}^ P~1i 1771V 4.2 JOHN D. FITE I3EPARTI~EP7'I' LARRY K.MEYER October 17, 1977 O ENN48-P. THO M-PSON JOHN E.SLAUGHTE R.JR. EMIL G. PRATE81 J. MARVIN GUTH RIE R. CARLTON WARD 7~7 HAND DELIVERED DAVID E. PLATTE The Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Clearwater City Hall 112 S. Osceola Avenue Clearwater, Florida- 33516 Re: Proposed Zoning Changes on Sand~Key Dear Sirs: This firm represents United States Steel Corporation, the owner of a number of parcels shown in the notice of public hearing scheduled for 1:30 P.M., October 18, 1977. Please be advised that United States Steel Corporation objects to the proposed zoning changes on all properties described in the notice of public hearing which it owns or has a mortgage interest. The properties in which U.S. Steel has a mortgage interest are: 1. That property owned by Cheezem Development Corpor- ation or a successor in interest lying between the Landmark Towers and Harbor Light Towers Condominiums. 2. That land lying to the South of Harbor Light Towers Condominium owned by the Trustees of Guardian Mortgage Invest- ors or their assign (this mortgage is presently the subject of a foreclosure action initiated by United States Steel Cor- poration). For the reasons stated in our letter of June 17, 1976, to the City Clerk of the City of Clearwater, we feel that .the City of Clearwater, in the absence of consent of United States Steel Corporation, is without jurisdiction to change the zoning. Very truly yours, ~~l~~ Dennis P. Thompson DPT/sco cc: J. R. Dembeck F. E. Felix, Jr. i • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • The Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold a public hearing at the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Ave., Clearwater, Florida, beginning at 1:30 P.M., Tuesday., October 18, 1977, AND The City Commission of the City of Clearwater will hold a public - hearing at the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Ave., Clearwater, Florida, beginning at 12:30 P.M., Thursday, November 3, 1977, for the purpose of considering items to be included in an Ordinance amending the City Zoning Laws and Maps as follows: 1. Change the following described property from CG (business) to RM-28 (high density multi-family): (A) -N 1013 ft. M.O.L. of Govt. Lot 1 and filled land E of Gulf Blvd., less Isle_ of Sand Key Condo _ No. 1, Sect. 30-29-15 and less N 116 ft. adjacent to Gulf Blvd. (B) Isle of Sand Key Condo No. 1. (C) S 487 ft. M.O.L. of Govt. Lot 2 and filled land E of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 19-29-15 and N 116 ft. of Govt. Lot 1 E of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 30-29-15. 2. Change the following described property from CG (business) to RM-16 (medium density multi-family): (A) Govt. Lot 2 E of Gulf Blvd., less S 487 ft. M.O.L. and Govt. Lot 1 E of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 19-29-15; Govt. Lot 1 E of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 20-29-15; and the S'ly 350 ft. M.O.L. of Govt. Lot 1 E of Gulf Blvd., Seet. 17-29-15, less Sand Key Condo - Bayside Gardens I, II, ,III, IV and Less the following: From NE corner of Sect. 19-29-15, run 888 ft. S, 50 ft. E and SW'ly 1080 ft. M.O.L. along E line of Gulf Blvd. to P.O.B., thence SW'ly 430 ft., SE'ly 200 ft., NE'ly along mean high water line to line projected S 67o E from P.O.B., NW'ly to P.O.B. (B) Sand Key Condo - Bayside Gardens I, II, III and IV. 3. Change the following described property from CG (business) to CTF-28 (commercial tourist facility): (A) From SW corner of Sect. 17-29-15 run E 843 ft., SW'ly 264 ft., NW'ly 50 ft. to P.O.B., run NE'ly 1150 ft., NW'ly 991 ft. to mean high water line, S'ly along said line to point lying N 47o W of P.O.B., SE'ly 540 ft. to P.O.B. CB) S 487 ft. M.O.L. of Govt. Lot 2 W of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 19-29-15 and N 1013 ft. of Govt. Lot 1 W of Gulf Blvd., Sect.. 30-29-15. '~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING .The Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold a public hearing at the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 112 S.,Osceola Ave., Clearwater, Florida, beginning at 1:30 P.M., Tuesday, October 18, 1977, AND The City Commission of the City of Clearwater will hold a public hearing at the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Ave., Clearwater, Florida, beginning at 12:30 P.M., Thursday, November ~,~ 1977, for the. purpose of considering items to be included in an Ordinance amending the City Zoning Laws and Maps as follows: 1. Change the following described property from CG (business) to RM-28 (high density multi-family): (A) N 1013 ft. M. 0.. L. of Govt. Lot 1 and filled land E of Gulf Blvd., less Isle of Sand Key Condo No. 1, Sect. 30-29-15 and less N 116 'ft. adjacent to Gulf Blvd. (B) Isle of Sand Key Condo No. 1. (C) S 487 ft. M.O.L. of Govt. Lot 2 and filled land E of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 19-29-15 and N 116 ft. of Govt. Lot 1 E of_ Gulf Blvd. , .Sect. 30-29-15. 2. Change the following described property from CG (business) to RM-16 (medium density multi-family): CA) Govt. Lot 2 E of Gulf Blvd., less S 487 ft. M.O.L. and Govt. Lot 1 E of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 19-29-15; Govt. Lot 1 E of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 20-29-15; and the S'ly 350 ft. M.O.L. of Govt. Lot 1 E of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 17-29-15, less Sand Key Condo - Bayside Gardens I, II, III, IV and less the following: From NE corner of Sect. 19-29-15, run 888 ft. S, 50 ft. E and SW'ly 1080 ft. M.O.L. along E line of Gulf Blvd. to P.O.B., thence SW'ly 430 ft., SE'ly 200 ft., NE'ly along mean high water line to line projected S 67o E from P.O.B., NW'ly to P.O.B. (B) Sand Key Condo - Bayside Gardens I, II, III and IV. 3. Change the following described property from CG (business) ~- to CTF-28 (commercial tourist facility): (A) From SW corner of Sect. 17-29-15 run E 843 ft., SW'ly 264 ft., NW'ly 50 ft. to P.O.B., run NE'ly 1150 ft., NW'ly 991 ft. to mean high water line, S'ly along said line to point lying N 47o W of P.O.B., SE'ly 540 ft. to P.O.B. (B) S 487 ft. M.O.L. of Govt. Lot 2 W of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 19-29-15 and N 1013 ft. of Govt. Lot 1 W of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 30-29-15. • • T 4. Change the following described property from CG (business) to RM-28 (high density multi-family): (A) Govt. Lots 1 and 2 W of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 19-29-15, less S 487 ft. M.O.L. of Lot 2 and less Sand Key Condo - South Beach 1 and 2 and less Clearwater Sand Key Club No. 1 Condo and less Harbour Light Towers Condo and Govt. Lot 1 W of Gulf Blvd., Sect. 20-29-15, less Harbour Light Towers Condo and Landmark Towers Condo. (B) Sand Key Condo - South Beach 1 and 2; Clearwater Sand Key Club No. 1 Condo; Harbour Light Towers Condo; and Landmark Towers Condo. Those persons interested are requested to be present for the purpose of being heard or may-fi-le written approval or objections with the Planning and Zoning Board for that Board's public hearing and with-the City Clerk for-=the- Ci-ty- Commission public_hearing,_at-City_Hall,-.112_ S. Osceola. Ave., Clearwater, Florida, prior to the date of the appropriate public hearing. City of Clearwater, Fla. R. G. Whitehead, City Clerk Warren Renando, Planning. Director Note: Applicant and/or his authorized representative must be present and submit all exhibits or other evidence at Planning and Zoning Board as well as City Commission hearings. 10-6-77 2. ~. • .- ~' ,. A~ L U X W ~ ~ C O ~ W ~'~ L. J Y s o~ ~ ~. y - A L ~ xe 0 3" i AL AL o a e 2 e 3 p v LEGEND ITEM I '„`~:~: ~;..`..k`n`" 1T E M Z ~;.;; Y;.~,; ~ITTE M 3 ~~~~~ 1T_EM 4 ~~~~ _-~~°, rrr~-r~ri Z Z ~ O W N. Q W ~ ~ ~ C~ Z c Z Z >- Q 1- z W p ~ O W N t- w Z . a. a ~ o O ~~ ~ z d cn a ~ ~ O Q m a = Z ° x v z ~ w J z }. z ~ d ~, Z. ~ J d 0. a V ~ ~ a~ ~ ~, -~~ cT ~ ~ o: o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ LL. v ~ ~e c ~ v c`c ~ !L n- A o > > ~ d. ~ v a m ~ o ~3 W ~~ ~ ~a ~~+~i "nn Q ° a0 a LJ U r= .. ~ L _~ •.°.'_ c.i ~ v ~ ~v ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ .Q u 4 ~ O ~ ti N ~ .. o ° v ~ u~ C O o ~ cn ~- 3 L o p ~ ~ O li F- z cn p w lsanba~ c~ ~ ~ ~ 6uiuoZ • • ., • CLEA R WATEP.: _ ~ ~; Mfe 3- ~•~'~ , ~ _I~\•I fale'-rte fa (e s-~~. '% f11C 3• ! - ~ ,y t1 7 w~is S r ''° °~'- r~ i MfB / // ~b~ file /~~~~ // ~'• ~~i fate I~9 ' .i 1 .aia i•s ~/ f: ieii i sw / ri a J i M j- ft s d I-7 ~ ~." • / ~••e '(4~i1• it _/ ~ ; I l- a~- ~- ~---_ . _~~ --~_ - ---- ~ /'•/' ~/ rr ~.v~re s /-d ,use i ~~ `' -- !' ~ - ~/ ! i,~ ~ Hier: .r-..~-„~,~ _ - .'~. J ie s-1 ,~ ,~. a Y' - ~ ..ate ~7 I k- '~' r ~, iI ~ va i n-! a ~' _"~ .:. r~ - - -- _'- - ._ - -- -' ... ~'rD Pror+osed Zoa+in6 ~ - - ~~ _ _ - P nL'Gl{ C - w ~. - rr__ _ Cenezal Business - tl ¢ra~ie Scala ~'°°~ - Flt-16 ~ - N . _ _ -- LEGEND V=Vaccn! Pkq=Pcrklap PROPERTY: p Sinpts Fomily ~13 = 8usinsss • ~=Mu{ti-family • Duplex Scola Refer Atlns Pcge' 1 ~-3 1"^200~ Sec ~nTwp•~4 R9°• /~ PUBLIC HEARING DATES PLANNING BOARD Owner/Applicont:~EE ~7~~Cf~~ d From• r'" ~' CIT7 COMh11SSION •o o To• ~- 7°~ ANNEXATION 9 ZONING tem No. n+ -~ REZOCi1NG _;, ,~ -.-~ AGENDA ' ING & ZONING BOARD October 18, 1977 ITEM ~ A - Approval of minutes of~September 20, 1977 B - Rezoning; 1. (A) N 1013 ft, MOL of Govt. Lot I & filled land E of Guif Blvd., less Isle of Sand Key Condo No, i, Sec. 30-29-15 and less N 116 ft. ad- jacent to Gulf Blvd. (B) Isle of Sand Key Condo No, 1 (C) S 487 ft. MOL of Govt. Lot 2 and filled Land E of Gulf Blvd., Sec. 19-29-15 and N 116 ft. of Govt. Lot 1 E of Gulf Blvd., Sec. 30-29-15 • Request: From: CG (Business) To': RM-28 (High Density Multi-family) 2. (A) Govt. Lot 2 E of Gulf Blvd., less S 487 ft. MOL and Govt. Lot 1 E of Gulf Blvd., Sec. 19-29-15; Govt. Lot 1 E of Gulf Blvd., Sec. 20-29-15; and the southerly 350 ft. MOL of Govt. Lot 1 E of Gulf Blvd,, Sec. 17-29-15, less Sand Key Condo - Bayside Gardens I, II, III, IV and less the following: From NE corner of Sec. 19-29-15, run 888 ft. S, 50 ft. E and south-_ westerly 1080 ft. MOL along E line of Gulf Blvd, to P, O.B., thence southwesterly 430 ft,, southeasterly 200 ft., northeasterly along mean high water line to line projected S 67° E from P,O~:B,, northwesterly to P.O.B. (B) Sand Key Condo _Bayside Gardens I, II, III and IV Request: From: CG (Business) To; RM-16 (Medium Density Multi-family) 3. (A) From SW corner of Sec. 17-29-15 run E 843 ft,, south- westerly 264 ft., northwesterly 50 ft, to P,O.B,, run northeasterly 1150 ft., northwesterly 991 ft. to mean high water line, southerly along said line to point lying N_47° 4J of P,O,B,, southeasterly 540 ft, to P,O,B, (B) S 487 ft. MOL of Govt. Lot 2 W of Gulf Blvd., sec. 19-29-15 and N 1013 ft. of Govt. Lot 1 W of Gulf Blvd., Sec. 30-29-15 ACTION Request: From: CG (Business) `' . To: CTF-28 (Commercial Tourist Facility) Agenda of the Planning ning Board - October 18, 1977 ,fil-v~ge ~~2 B - Rezoning (Cont,'d.): 4. (A) Govt. Lots 1 and 2 W of Gulf Blvd., Sec. 19-29-15, less S 487 ft. MOL of Lot 2 and less Sand Key Condo - South Beach.l and 2 and less Clearwater Sand Key Club No. 1 Condo and less Harbour Light Towers Condo and Govt. Lot 1 IJ of Gulf Blvd., Sec. 20-29-15, less Harbour LightT.owers Condo and Landmark Towers Condo (B) Sand Key Condo - South Beach 1 and 2; Clearwater Sand Key Club No. 1 Condo; Harbour Light_ Towers Condo; and Landmark Towers Condo Request: From: CG (Business) To: RM-28 (High Density Multi-family) (NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED) C - Other Action and/or Review Items D - Chairman's Items:. Report of City Commission action of October 6, 1977 follows: 1. £ommunity Development Application - Accepted - $826 million HUD Grant 2. Requests for Rezoning: a. Tract 7, Sec. 19-28-S-16E, Countryside (U. S. Home) Request: From: P (Public) To: RS-50 (Single Family) b. Countryside Tract 22, Sec. 29-28-S-16 (U. S. Home) Request: From: RM-28 (High Density Multi-family) To: RPD (Residential Planned Development) Above referred to proper Boards for action. 3. Requests for Annexation & Zoning: a. Lots 22, 23, 26 and portions of 24 and 25, Hillcrest Estates, 1st Addn. (Heishman and Hunt) Request: RS-75, Single Family E - Director's Items F - Board & Staff Comments • ~"..~~. _ __ ----- a--' ~ - /o~P - ~7 0 _ ~-- ___ __ ~~ ~ ~ ~ -~ T_" ~ O ~~i ~~~, ,,_ '- ~as7l ~?~~'~~ -- - _._. - - y~ (/~_ ~ _ _ _~. _ _ __. _._ _'"Y. ..._ ....... _ _ ,~~~/ _. ---- --t----- ---- -- -- -- - - --_-, - J r ~`` ~~ ____ '. -- - ,--- -_ -- -- -- P _ _ - __- - ._-- ._ _ _~~~ _ 6-~ - /~~ / • .~. ~/ M • -- / ~--J --- '' ._ .,~G ~! _.. _. - --- -- _~_ - ~~~ `7 ... ~'-rte-- -~t-- `~'~-' c -- - - r`! ~~~ _ ~ , ___i Ilm~ M1.~~ {._ __ no -i ~~~~~- {.~=G ~wti~~~- i 5~ ~ ~ ~" =~: ii ~- w • a) ca'l' -~ ~T~°~~ Api°'°,.~5v ~Y • r WHEREAS, the establishment and administration of a sound land use planning process is consistent with the ideals of the Sierra Club and this local chapter; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater is in the process of considering revisions to its zoning ordinance as part of_ such on-going planning process that will have considerable impact upon the sensitive and vital off-shore barrier island of Sand Key; and WHEREAS, such revised zoning designation as has been proposed for Sand Key by the City Planning Department would reduce the potential intensity of development and related traffic volumes; and ti,THEREAS, such reduction in the intensity of potential development and its attendant vehicular traffic offers an improved opportunity to recognize the natural and man-made limitations of this sensitive area and thus to preclude unnecessary environmental damage and public expenditures; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this chapter of the Sierra Club does endorse and support the recommended rezoning of Sand Key as set forth by the Clearwater City Planning Department and commends same to the attention of, and consideration by, the City Commission. ... 'f _ ~~ . ~~. c.~° ~ ~ .. --_ _~ . - - w 4 --- - ~ ~ q ____ _ __ ~~ ,,.~ .o __ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ . r, _~ -r ~ - - .__ - ------ -- - - - - - _ --- ---- _ . i1 ---- - ---- - ~-+ - ~, ~ c ~ ~ ~~~~ z~~ ~~, ~ ~~ ~~ 7c~y" ~6 y~ E~ ~ r- ~ .,,~,~ 4 //~~,,~~ _ .w. .. ,, ~.. - .~.--T-- - -- --- - -- - -- __ _. _ .. ._ II __ - -- f -.------------------------ ~.~ ~..- i,~. Or~± oo. N. fit,. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT CHART/SAND KEY HEIGHT Pl~1tKING F .A. R. DENSITY SETBACKS Permitted Proposed Required ( Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Proposed Required Proposed ~:i `,I,eraton 88' 8U'/88' 1.5 Sp. 1.5 Sp. N/A 28 28 Front: Front ~:.;~r~~z~m) Per U.U. D.U, D.U. 15'-20' 15'-2U' Per Per aide: ' ' ~.de: 6 ' ~ Net Acre Gross 128 -192 - 0 2 Acre Kear: Rear: 0' Function ~' of llgt. ' ~ ' ~ 3 F N/A ~,_ to Sheraton 88 15U 1.5 Sp. N/A N/A far N/A 28 U.U. 8 D.U. ront: ~. side Cul.f 1;1vd. Per U.U. CG,Except Per Net hotel U-21' (u.5. steel) + for riulti Acre Units 1 sp. per Family PAer Grose cre + Side: 351'- lUU syy.ft ltetail (which F.A.R. is Retail 526' area + 15) .5 Uffice Rear: 1 sp. Itl~t-16 25' pper 0 ~ 3U sq.ft Office Area ~,i 'fenuis Courts 88' 15U' ~ 1.5 sp. 1.U4 sp. 1.5 2.73 28 U.U. 61.1 D U Front:20' Sid 20'+ ,;1~~e~zu~i) per D.U. per D.U. per net . per . e: acre r~ oss Interior acre lU3' S' I Street & ~, Water- i I i front ' I ~ 1S5' S' ~ CCCL: 4`l.5' 42.5'+ ~ , 5' for ~ ; I ~ ' Deck 0' _ of Cabana Club ~ 88' ~ 15U' 1.5 sp. 1.5 sp. ( 1.5 2.8 ~ 28 U.U. 46 D.U. Front:20' 2U'+ ,~'.~. Steel) '(15 per D.U.' ~ per U.U. per net per Side: 5tories) acre r~ oss Interior: acre x197' x30' i Street & water- front ~; i 295' X60' CCCL: 42.5' -- ~~' „ '. , ~aov ` ~ ~~ ~v ,~ . ~_ -- /Q° ~/ ~.- -- ~`~°~ v~~ i . • _~ ---- - -____-.yam'-7~ --- - --1 - - - -0 "`~'' ~'-q-~6'1-.--'---- - ~A / - - - ---- --- ---- --- --- - t ~ ~~/ - - - ,~ ~~~ /r ~y 6GU ~'~° v ~ ~ © ~ - _ ~ ,. __._ -- __ ___ __-_ o o ~ . ~ ®.~ - ,- - ---~~ ~-~ -~ ---- -700 - -~<~- _ __ _. _. ~, II ,. ~ .. TO: FROM: COPIES: SUBJECT: CITY OF • department Mr. peal Bergmann, Planning Director Keith Cra`rford, Director of Traffic Engineering. CLEARWATER Correspondence Sheet DATE- Sand Key TrafZYc Generation June 29, 1976 this is in response to your request Yor information regarding projected traffic volumes on Sand Key. We have prepared this information in three increments: 1. Trips generated by existing development 2. `Yips generated by development of the public park on Sand Key 3. Development oP property which currently is vacant Information here is presented in summary form. Tables are attached which shox actual computations of the figures used in this report. Existing development is co muted to ~-cnerate th vo1 ,tee of 81? v h~ 7 A per day on Gulf %ovlevard. Zhis fig,.ire is higher than the volumes found at=• a er end of S;uid i:ey where measurement has taken place. In 1972 the volume on Gulf Boulevard dust north of the. Eelleair Causeway vas measured at 6600 vehicles, per day. On the Clearti:ater Pass Bridge the volumes are recorded in the 5000-5000 vehicles per day ranEe. The average for 2~:ay, 1976, Was ,just over 5000 vehicles per day. This apFarent discrepancy betxeen ~:~.ctual volumes and projected volumes can be accounted for by the fact that some tri:.~s a.Te briented southerly and others are oriented northerly.. Actual volumes are also influenced by a substantial vacancy rate for existing units. The public park on Sand f:ey is estimated to contain 70 acres. In the Kunde report a figure of 10,800 trips per day seas arrived at based on the maximum number of people that can be acco~nodated on the acreage and an allo~rance of ~2.5 people per vehicle. Hoxever, in checking the activity at other proainent parks in the county ve find that Anderson Park generates 40 trips per developed acre and Hoxard Park generates ~+9 trips per developed acre. Using ~5 trips as an average and developed acres on Sand Key for the park, ve arrive at a figure of 3150 rips per day. Combining existin development and park development a traffic pro~e~on for 11,322 trips is established re ardless of the ultimate use of the property v s pox vacant. T'ne present zoning gill a11ox the development of ~3~+ additional motel units and 2391 additional residential units. Applying a factor oP 5 trips per motel unit and 7.2 trips per residential units xe coupute a projected volu.~^e of 19,385 vehicles per day. If 10 acres were developed as retail stores instead of residential unite the pro3ected volume becomes 22,3.ig.vehicles per daffy . TO: FROM: COPIES: SUBJECT: DATE: CI?Y OF CLEARWATER • department Correspondence Sheet Mr. Paul Bergmann - Page r~2 Keith Crawford Sand Kcy Traffic Generation June 29, 1976 As an alternate proposed development ve used k8.1c~ acres dt 28 units per acre, 11.22 acres at 16 units per acre, and 17.08 acres at $2 motel units ver acre. A 19 acre CTF zone vas computed at 10 acres of commercial and 9 acres of residential deYeloisment. Applying the trip factors ve arrived at a total volume of 21,k01 trips per day if the residential portion is developed at 28 units per acre. This figure becomes 20,623 iP the residential portion is developed at 16 units per acre. Coabininb all of the pro3ected trips ve get the following possibilities: ALREADY PUBLIC POSSIBLE DEYELOPF.D PARK DSPEIAPf~iSNT TOTAL Fo further 8 172 development , 3,150 0 11,322 ~ gti~rr Winn 8,172. 3,150 19,385 30,70T 85, hl acres @ 28 units/acre 10.35 acres rr 1+2 motel units/acre ~d stingy Zoning 8,172 3,150 22,322 33,61 75.1+1 acres @ 28 units/acre 10.00 acres retail 10.35 acres @ >+2.motel units/acre Pro used Zoning 8,172 3,7-50 21,101 32,723 1~8. >+ acres @ 28 units/acre 11.22 acres @ 16 units/acre 17.08 acres @ ~2 motel units/acre 10.00 acres retail 9.02 acres CTF @ 28 units/acre Pro osed Zonin 8,172 3,150 20,623 31,95 8.~k acres @ 28 units/acre 20.2h acres @ 16 units/acre 17.08 acres @ 1;2 Hotel units/acre 10.00 acres retail These projections are based on the best inSoraation available at the present time. A reduction in these volumes would be appropriate due to the fact that the property is iamediately ad,acent to a toll bridge which v~ould have s tendancy to reduce the number of trips in and out of the property. wren a~"ter making an allo-.r-aace it i8 obvic-.is that substant+_~~ improvements will bare to be made to Gulf Boulevard in order to handle :r r _ ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER • department Correspondence Sheet TO: Mr. Paul Bergmann - Pagc ~3 FROM: Keith Cranford COPIES: SUBJECT: Sand Kcy Traffic Generation DATE: June 29, 1976 the traffic that Would be generated by the development of Sand Key. The Pinellas Area Transit Study (PATS) identifies the hi~hvatiy capacity of a tvo lane arterial at 600 ve e e As indicated earlier the roa as-+~.ose to that volume alre.ad PATS also indicates a capacity o- , _ /for a Pour lane undivided arterial and a capacity of 25,000 a~ Por a four lane divided arterial. AssuQaing that half of the trips generated go north and the other half go south on Gulf Boulevard, a p volume of 15,000 to 16,000 vehicles per day Would have to be accomodated. at any given point on Gulf Boulevard. 'i'he capacities used by PATS alloy comfortable use of the street. We have tWO lane street in the city carrying 12,000 vehicles per day. Drex Street carries 19,000 vehicles per day in the four lane undivided section. KC:la • PPOJrCT~ VOLt?I~. ~S ~'iSL'D CN E~ISTI;~G CD2~STHUCTIG.T 21.09 acres E: hig]i density = 708 units X 7.2 trips/unit (1) _ 16."I3 ~ :•iedium " = 152 X 7.2 "_ '. _ 16.96 €~ motel = 396 X 5 . G (2) _ PUPLIC Phii~ 70 ?~cres Y k5 trips/acL'e (3) . Pr'.O~1CTE.~ 'IGI~t~: FvF SE~iATi~:~r:'~, r..~IS'i'Ii;G ZG:;l;<G 5,0~~ trips 1 ,Oc,~ 1 ~98G ., 8,X72 " ..., 3,1;~ 65.~i acres X 2? units; acre = 2391 units X 7.2 trips/unit = 17,21> " ,r 0.3~ :{ k2 motel units/sire = ~+3!~ •anits X 5.0 trigs/ = 22170 u: it. 19, 3fi5 " " OR 15.1 acres X 28 units/acre = 2111 ur11VS X 7.2 trips/unit = 15,19`! " lO.GG acres o€ retail X X95 trigs/arse -- k,95o 10._,5 X !+2 Lc•'.;el units%acre = !+34 units X 5.0 trips/ = 2,170 " . unit 22,319 •• PRCW`.C=.:> ~'O~.iJ~~iL FOR ::L'~14Ii::~~r:,_ PC'SSIBLE Z;)itll~i~ ~ •• 1i8.j~1; acres :~ 28 u_-~its!acre = 1356 units X 7.2 trips/~.znit - J,763 11.22 X 16 r: ,. = i7o ,r X 7.2 ~. ,r = 1,2;.9 ,~ 1?.OS :i L2 ~~ael units%acre = 717 units :i 5.0 trips/ -. ^ _ ~,5~~: ' unit 10.00 5 tripsrunit (ti acres retail X ~? ') ~~7 - ~' ,~ 9.02 :C 28 ur~i;:sr'a^_re - 252 units :~. 7.2 trips/u.ni:. = i.8'! +; " 21,!;:)1 ~, UR + S31-ne as above ea~,e~t 9.0< acre., r: ]_b uni v.., n.G. e = 1 k uni..~ 7.2 trips; unit 'r cO,Ol3 cr (1) Tai:en fro:: Trip L::ns Gee:crag ion Researcr;, 197' F'icr. i3L i~G? ,~°) : i;-;r_res no:, s-aile;:ic; :,used cn exT:°rierir_E (3 j tvera~e of anti': its at Andcrso:~ Perk & ro~r-ard Park f~;) f ss+mes 11,OG0 s~uai•e fe_t of dross floor urea Yer acre on one levr.•].. 'v'a1Le of ~jO trips per 30,~~00 squat e feet of £ross floor area t,t:];e:~ iron Trip ~-ad> ~eaerstior. Research, 197L'~, :'-o::.dy LOT I ° '• . ~ ~ ' . • "DO IT YOt t1~SELF" VOL'R•IE PR~3.TECTI02a KiT 1 acre X 28 units/acre X 7.2 trips/unit ~ = 201.6 trips 1 Acre X 16 units/acre X 7.2 trips/unit = 115..2 trips 1 Acre X 42 notei units/acre }: 5 trips/unit = 216.0 trips 1 Hcre o: retail }r ~QS trips/a_re~ = k45 tr? s P ~ Retail trips are ~enerslly based on trips per 10,C~OG square feet Of t(~OoS floor area. 'T'here is rcugh3y 11,000 square feet capability for retail de~alopment on oae acre ass;iming one story cons ~r~a~ti~n . 6 _'~ ~, I ~pt., ..., w.. ~dl~7 mot„ ~,pdr ~.- CLEARWATER BEACH - SAND KEY v e h i c u l a r a c c e s s s t u d y BRIEFLY: I. Clearwater Beach and Sand Key, together comprising. nearly one thousand land • acres, are under the impact of vary rapid, and recent, development. Separated from the mainland by the I I/2 mile width of Clearwater Bay, their only direct link with Clearwater proper is the 4-lane, toll-free, Memorial Causeway. 2. Built nearly 50 years ago, the Causeway has had an 85°6 increase in traffic in a recent 10-year period, With average daily traffic now in excess of 30,000 vehicles, capacity is being severely strained, and in view of further rapid growth both on the mainland and on the islands, the prospect is 'For the traffic situation to worsen to the point where it becomes intolerable. 3. The total number of trips daily between the islands and mainland will re- sult primarily from the capacity of the islands to produce and attract trips, Hence, future land use and population expectancies for the islands are of high- est importance in planning for future traffic needs. • 4. Socio-economic factors affectin future traffic com rise both osi ' 9 p p true and negative elements, On the one hand, the abnormally high number of small, afflu- ent households, high incidence of auto ownership, and presence of major recrea- tion attractions contribute toward high traffic generation at Clearwater Beach and Sand Key; on the other hand, these communities are markedly belora normal in terms of size of the resident labor Force,proportionate number of available jobs, and size of the student population, tending. to diminish the necessity for travel For work and education purposes. ;1~ S. Environmental qualities of Clearwater Bay's 10,$00 acres must be co eyed, as well as traffic needs, The Bay comprises a complex natural ecosls- tem in which energy flows are determinative of qualit y, and in which stress results from a drain of such flow aiaay from the system, From a varlet f related causes, the Bay is.quite evidently a serious{y stressed s stem present. For exam le s y o P , tresses resulting from man's y at 74~ of the original marine grass areas, which are thopresence have destroyed • the estuarine ecosystem. Five to ten more Primary producers of loading, urban runoff years of present levels of sewage brid es ~ etc., combined with lessened flushing due to causeways, 9 and finger-fills, will almost assuredly increase stress to the where the Bay will be destroyed as a functional estuary of high value A comprehensive management plan is urgently needed, Point to man. 6. Future travel needs, to 1990, have been estimated, based on "u Itimate" de- velopment of Clearwater Beach Sand Key, comprising in excess of I 000 ing units, a population in the range of 26,000 to 36,000, riiore tlian410 hous- of land in business use, over 4,000 local 0 acres age capable of attracting nearly 2$,000 ersons da~lpublic beach and park acre- vehicular traffic across the Bay might reach 92,$Op,yan Tncreaselofnj daily the 1973 traffic, 56~ over 7. The need to plan for, and to cope with, this explosive rate of will, if ignored, have serious social and economic consequences fortraffic water community, Further growth I I/2~ of the cross-ba 'public mass transit, presently meeting notmorelthan fective solution in the foreseeable~futurenot app-ear to hold potential as an ef- $. Based on capacity to handle projected traffic volumes at an a of service, the apparent need is for imm,___edia~e widening and im roveeptable level ial Causeway and its approaches, together with two additional brid ment of Memor- locations, one by 19$0 and the second before (990. ges at other .:h.. 9. Criteria for selecting and evaluating alternative bridge proposals include recognizing that the focal point of travel desires is shifting toward the south at Clearwater Beach - Sand Key; that bridge connections at the mainland end must tie in with arterial streets that penetrate the hinterland and are capable of collecting and distributing cross-bay traFfic; and that pre Ference should be given, in selecting connecting routes at both ends, to arterials that are, or may in the future be included, in the Federal-aid highway system of the region. 10. Three combinations have been considered as alternatives: (I) Memorial Causeway, alone, improved, at a construction cost of $3,911,000; (2) Memorial Causeway, improved, plus a new northern ~acr rty based on a bridge between Kipling Plaza at Clearwater Beach and Sunset Point on the mainland; total cost, including connecting arterial improvements and "overhead" elements, $26,275,000; and (3) Memorial Causeway, improved, plus a new southern facility based on a bridge between Clearwater Point (at tf-e Beac h and a Magnolia Drive-Druid Road alignment on the mainland; total cost, including connecting arterial improve- ments and "overhead", $24,300,000 to $2$,290,000. II, Based on estimated average daily vehicle miles during a 10-year period, 1976-19$5, and an assumed cost of 14 cents per mile for vehicle operation, the southern alternative might result in a total saving to motorists of nearly $16 million, in contrast with the northern. Other advantages of the southern route include less damage to the Clearwater Bay ecosystem, closer relationsl~ip~to the weighted average of travel desires, and lower initial capital costs, In terms of community impact, analysis indicates no very great difi'erence between the - northern and southern routes. I2. Regarding financing feasibility, if it is assumed that only the bridge structures would have to be revenue-financed, the southern route might operate at atoll that would be about 5 cents less than the northern; however, the northern route has an advantage in the fact that its easterly connecting arter- ial (Sunset Point Road') is already on the Federal-aid system, whereas Druid Road, the connector for the southerly route, is not on the system presently and would require approving action by the several levels of government to be so in- cluded. ' • ~TY OF CLEARWATER Interdepartment Correspondence Sheet to: W. D. Renando, Planning Director FROM: Dave Healey,-Chief Planner COPIES: sus~EC~: Highlights of Traffic Volume Considerations Pertinent to Sand Key Rezoning ~ _ DATE: October 18, 1977 Importance of land use type and intensity as direct determinant of trip generation noted in both Kunde and Traffic Engineering reports. 1976 volume of traffic estimated at 8,200. vehicles per day - volume capacity of two-lane.ar.terial road equals 6,000 +_ vehicles per day. This road is at or near capacity at present. Projected volume based on present development estimated at 11,300 vehicles per day. Existing zoning at developed capacity would generate 31-34,000 vehicle trips per day - three times that now anticipated. Land developed at 28 acres per. unit generates approximately twice the number of vehicle trips ~as at 16 units per acre (115/201). Motel accomodations at 42 units/acre approximately equal to residential use at 28 units/acre (210/201:). Retail commercial use generates four times the number of vehicle trips of residential use at 16 units/acre and more than twice the number at 42 units/acre of motel use (115/210/495). DH: jr .~ TO: Mr. Paul Bergmann, Planning Director FROM: Keith Crawford, Director of Traffic Engineering. COPIES: SUBJECT: DATE: Sand Key Traffic Generation June 29, 1976 ~Y OF CLEARWATER 1 department Correspondence Sheet this is in response to your request for information regarding projected traffic volumes on Sand Key. We have prepared this information in three increments: . 1. Trips generated by existing development 2. Trips generated by development of the public park on Sand Key 3. Development of property which currently is vacant Information here is presented in su~unsry form. Tables are attached which show actual computations of the figures used in this report. Existin develo went is co~uuted to ener ~ per day on Gulf roulevard. this figure is higher than the volumes found at~• a er end of Sand i~ey where measurement has taken place. In 1972 the volume on Gulf Boulevard dust north of the. Eelleair Causeway was measured at 6600 vehicles. per day. On the Clearwater Pass Bridge the volumes are recorded in the 5000-6000 vehicles per day range. The average for May, 1976, was dust over 5000 vehicles per day. This apparent discrepancy between actual volumes and pro3ected volumes can be accounted for by the fact that some trigs are oriented southerly and others are oriented northerly. Actual volumes are also influenced by a substantial vacancy rate for existing units. The public park on Sand hey is estimated to contain 70 acres. In the Kunde report a figure of 10,800 trips per day was arrived at based on the maximum number of people that can be acconmmodated on the acreage and an allowance of 2.5 people per vehicle. However, in checking the activity at other proiainent parks in the county we find that Anderson Park generates 40 trips per developed acre and ~ioward Park generates ~9 trips per developed acre. Using ~+5 trips as an average and 70 developed acres on Sand Key for the park, we arrive at a figure of 3150 trips per day. Combining existin development and vark develo~ent a trarra.e pro~ecL~c~n for 11 322 tri s is established re ardless the ultimate use of the property w s now vacant. T"ne present zoning will allow the development of k3~+ additional motel units and 2391 additional residential units. Applying a factor of 5 trips per motel unit and 7.2 trips per residential unit, we compute a projected volume of 19,385 vehicles per day. If 10 acres were developed as retail stores instead of residential units the prosected volume becomes 22,319 vehicles per day. • TO FROM: Mr. Paul Bergmann - Page ~2 ~TY OF CLEARWATER rdep~rtment Correspondence Sheet Keith Cravford COPIES: SUBJECT: Sand Key Traffic Generation DATE: June 29, 1976 As an alternate proposed development We used k8.1+~+ acres ~t 28 unite per acre, 11.22 acres at 16 units per acre, and 17.08 acres at h2 motel units ver acre. A 19 acre CTF zone eras computed at 10 acres of eoma~ereial and 9 acres of residential development. Applying the trip factors ve arrived at a total volume of 21,k01 trips per day if the residential portion is developed at 28 units per acre. This figure becomes 20,623 if the residential portion is developed at 16 units per acre. Combinint; all of the pro3ected trips ve get the follovins possibilities: ALREADY PUBLIC POSSIBLE DESIELOPED PARK DFsVELOPi~i£NT TOTAL loo further development 8,1T2 .3,150 0 11,322 ,Btiaa Z.oniri~ 8,172 . 3,150 19,385 30,707 85. ~+1 acres @ 28 units/acre 10.35 acres @ 1+2 motel units/acre ~xisti ~ Zoning 8,172 3,150 22,322 33,6b1 75.1 acres ~ 28 units/acre 10.00 acres retail 10.35 acres @ ~+2.motel units/acre _Pr_o~o_s~ed~,Zonin~ 8,172 3,150 21,01 32,723 ~8.4~+ acres @ 28 units/acre 11.22 acres @ 16 units/acre 17.08 acres @ ~2 motel unite/acre 10.00 acres retail 9.02 acres CTF @ 28 units/acre Pro osed 2onin 8,172 3,150 20,623 31,9+5 8.~tk acres @ 28 units/acre 20.2k acres @ 16 units/acre 17.08 acres @ ~t2 motel units/acre 10.00 acres retail These projections are based on the best inSor~tion available at the present time. A reduction in these volumes irould be appropriate due to the fact that the property is immediately aa,acent to a toll bridge vhieh would have a tendency to reduce the number of trips in and out of the property. hen after malting an ellorvance it is obvious that substantial improvements xi.ll have to be made to Gulf Boulevard in order to handle • TO: Mr. Paul Bergmann - Page 1~3 FROM: Keith Cranford COPIES: SUBJECT: Sand Key Traffic Generation DATE: June 29, 1976 ~TY OF CLEARWATER department Correspondence Sheet the traffic that Would be generated by the development of Sand Key. The Pinellas Area Transit Study (PATS) identifies the hitzhvay capacity of a ttao lane arterial at 600 e e e As indicated earlier the roa as close to that volume ahead PATS also indicates a capacity o for a four lane undivided arterial and a capacity of 25,000 for a four lane divided arterial. Assuiaing that half of the trips generated So north and the other half go south on Gulf Boulevard, a volume of 15,000 to 16,000 vehicles per day would have to be accouunod.ated at any given point on Gulf Boulevard. The capacities used by PATS allow comfortable use of the street. We have tiro Zane street in the city carrying 12,000 vehicles per day. Drew Street carries 19,000 vehicles per day in the four lane undivided section. KC:la • • YPOJrCTL~ VOLt?1~iES B~'~ob'D CN I:~iISTIJyG C02JSTkUCTIG.7 21.09 acres ~ hi~;~i density = 708 units X 7.2 trips/unit (1) = 5,03 trips 16."l3 £ J•fedium " = 152 X 7,2 „ „ = 1,0;4 :I.G.9o E:' motel = 396 X 5.G (2) = 1,9~G " . ~ ~1?2 „ P;JBLIC P;;~;r 70 Ares J+5 t. ips/acre (3) 3~1i0 nOJ~;CTF. ? •:i ?''u R ~ E~i~;iJOr. ~I., Iiw ~ ,.L,<v 85.J;1 acres X 2P units,'acre = 2391 units X 7.2 trips/unit = 17,215 ?O.;i ;i L2 m~=;,zl unitsJa:re = ~3'-~ ~.uiits X 5.0 trips/ - 2,170 " unit 19,385 OR X5.41 Rcres x ?_~ units/acre = 2111 units X 7.2 tries/unit S~ y = 1, 19~ „ 30. G0 acres of r.~tnil 1. X95 trips/acre -- k,950 10.:;5 ?: J+2 Lot•el unitsjacre = 434 units X 5.0 trips/ _ 2i - unit 22,318 „ P;OJ~C ~.L i~O.i.fJi'iL FOR ~:L'•fAIJrur~r~_ POSSIBLE Z~)itTl:ii JiB. J~J~ acres :~ ~8 uai.ts: acre = 135b unit.., ~' ~ ~ X '' j . ~ urips/~.u~it - 7 3 J, 5 , ' 11.??_ A i6 ,: ,. _ 170 X 7 2 „ „ = 1,2`i9 „ 1~.G8 ;i 42 ~::~;.el un.its%acre = 717 units X 5.0 tri}~s/ - 3,535 , unit 10.00 acre:- retail }: ~?5 trips/unit (J*) L ,95~~ - „ ~.02 " :~ 2S ur~i.tsis.cre = 2`~2 u_nits .: 7.2 trips/unit -- ~_ lUS 4 „ 21,~:i~1 " CiR ~ S~-~e as arc;ve exeer,t //~~ ~~. VC s.cres 1. 1.~ unl i•.u~ I3.G re - 1Lk unit) ./ 1C 7.2 trl~lJ %~uSJ: t ^ - 1~ ~ „ ? 1T (~~ /,1 t G`J,UI ~ " (1) Tal~:en fro:: Trip L"::ns Gc,:eratioT. Research, 19 I ~ , F'1^r. i3a y0T ;~`) i`i"'.~:r•e~ no's av~:ile::lc.; L«se8 ~•n exT:eri.er,ce ( j tveraCe of activity at Andr_r::on Park & ro~rard Park (J;) ~ ss~mes 11.,OG0 square feet of Cross Sloar rhea yer acrE on one levr.~.. rrilue of X50 trips F~~r 1u,~~00 squri.: ~ feet of dross fl.o,~r areA ta};en from Trig~nn> G°aerat,ior. t cset~rch, 197L' , F':~o~::-dP.:%rT • ~~ ., . ,•. . • •i• "DO iT YOtTftS~LF" VOL'Jl•1E PRO,TECTI02b KIT 1 Acre X 2~ units/acre X 7.2 trips/unit = 201.6 trips 1 Acre X 16 uritsjacre X 7.2 trips/unit _ 115..2 trips i Acre X ~2 notei units/acre ?: 5 tripsjunit = 21G.0 trips 1 i~cre o: retail j:. bg5 trips/a''re~ _ x+45 trips ~ Retail tips sre gener~~lly based on trips per 10,000 square feet of moss floor area. There is rcugh3y 11,000 square feet caxabiiity for retail deti~elopment on oae acre ass;ur~ing one story construction. A. ~N.., n.~ w ~ . CLEARWATER BEACH -SAND KEY vehicular access study BRIEFLY: I, Clearwater Beach and Sand Key, together comprising nearly one thousand land acres, are under the impact of very rapid, and recent, development. Separated . from the mainland by the I I/2 mile width of Clearwater Bay, their only direct link with Clearwater proper is the 4-lane, toll-free, Memorial Causeway, 2, Built nearly 50 years ago, the Causeway has had an 85~ increase in traffic in a recent 10-year period. With average daily traffic now in excess of 30,000 vehicles, capacity is being severely strained, and in view of further rapid growth both on the mainland and on the islands, the prospect is for the traffic situation to worsen to the point where it becomes intolerable, 3. The total number of trips daily between the islands and mainland will re- sult primarily from the capacity of the islands to produce and attract trips, Hence, future land use and population expectancies for the islands are of high- est importance in planning for future traffic needs, 4. Socio-economic factors affecting future traffic comprise both .positive and negative elements, On the one hand, the abnormally high number of small, afflu- ent households, high incidence of auto ownership, and presence of major recrea- tion attractions contribute toward high traffic generation at Clearwater Beach and Sand Key; on the other hand, these communities are markedly below normal in terms of size of the resident labor force,proportionate number of available jobs, and size of the student population, tending to diminish the necessity for travel for work and education purposes, g ~~~j / 7 ~ 3 1. • i~. S. Environmental qualities of Clearwater Bay's 10,800 acres must be consid- ered, as well as traffic needs. The Bay comprises a complex natural ecosys- tem in which energy flows are determinative of quality, and in which stress results from a drain of such flow away from the system. From a variety of related causes, the Bay is .quite evidently a seriously stressed system at present. For example, stresses resulting from man's presence have destroyed 74i6 of the original marine grass areas, which are the primary producers of the estuarine ecosystem. Five to ten more years of present levels of sewage loading, urban runoff, etc., combined with lessened flushing due to causeways, bridges, and finger-fills, will almost assuredly increase stress to the point where the Bay will be destroyed as a functional estuary of high value to man. A comprehensive management plan is urgently needed. 6, Future travel needs, to 1990, have been estimated, based on "ultimate" de- velopment of Clearwater Beach - Sand Key, comprising in excess of 14,000 hous- ing units, a population in the range of 26,000 to 36,000, more than 100 acres of land in business use, over 4,000 local jobs, and public beach and park acre- age capable of attracting nearly 28,000 persons daily, The resultant daily vehicular traffic across the Bay might reach 92,800, an increase of 156 over the 1973 traffic. 7. The need to plan for, and to cope with, this explosive rate of traffic growth will, if ignored, have serious social and economic consequences for the Clear- water community, Further, public mass transit, presently meeting no more than I I/2~ of the cross-bay travel need, does not appear to hold potential as an ef- fective solution in the foreseeable future. 8. Based on capacity to handle ~ of service the a pro'ected traffic volumes at an acceptable level pparent need is for immediate widening and improvement of Memor- ial Causeway and its approaches, together with two additional bridges at other locations, one by 1980 and the second before 1990, -~. i~ 9. Criteria for selecting and evaluating alternative bridge proposals include recognizing that the focal point of travel desires is shifting toward the south at Clearwater Beach - Sand .Key; that bridge connections at the mainland end must tie in with arterial streets that penetrate the hinterland and are capable of collecting and di'stributi'ng cross-bay traffic; and that preference should be given, in selecting connecting routes at both ends, to arterials that are, or may in the future be included, in the Federal-aid highway system of the region. • 10. Three combinations have ' been considered as alternatives; (I) Memorial Causeway, alone, improved, at a construction cost of $3,911,000; (2) Memorial Causeway, improved, plus a new northern aci ity based on a bridge between Kipling Plaza at Clearwater Beach and Sunset Point on the mainland; total cost, including connecting arterial improvements and "overhead" elements, $26,275,000; and (3) Memorial Causeway, improved, plus a 'new southern facility based on a bridge between Clearwater Point (at the Beach) and a Magnolia Drive-Druid Road alignment on the mainland; total cost, including connecting arterial improve- ments and "overhead", $24,300,000 to $25,290,000, II. Based on estimated average daily vehicle miles during a 10-year period, 1976-1985, and an assumed cost of 14 cents per mile for vehicle operation, the southern alternative might result in a total saving to motorists of nearly $16 million, in contrast with the northern. Other advantages of the southern route • include less damage to the Clearwater Bay ecosystem, closer relationship"to the weighted average of travel desires, and lower initial capital costs, In terms of community impact, analysis indicates no very great difference between the " northern and southern routes. 12. Regarding financing feasibility, if it is assumed that only the bridge structures would have to be revenue-financed, the southern route might operate at atoll that would be about 5 cents less than the northern; however, the northern route has an advantage in the fact that its easterly connecting arter- ial (Sunset Point Road) is already on the Federal-aid system, whereas Druid Road, the connector for the southerly route, is not on the system presently and would require approving action by the several levels of government to be so in- cluded, ~. iii ,. • • ~ Tlt _ ~~ i ~-'~ Cry-~_~®_~a_ _ O ~ .. _.Ca e^~ o~_ ,iT~J_f-cd _ ._ ~..._~/~l G~-s's^~-L~ - • . . ~~~~~ !^~ G`--~ -c - -- - - - - Vic.. ~.._. c4_c..,~fi •. _ _,. _ ~ 5 ._ ~~ Gc~ ~~/'.. V - - _ _, _y . ,~ - - GtG~~ / ~° ~~ - - ~~_ ~~ ~ s -p/ ~.c'.~ -=-7_~ /`~°C'ad.~,.ri,C•,~~i-YL-c"7 _ . ~ _ t~°c~~!' . G~o , __ _ ~~ ~/ _ __ . . _ _ - - _ -- - ... __ _ ~~~~ /~,~ _ - - - - ~t-- -~ ---~ -- -... .__ m---_..._---~-~ • • . ~/ - - - __. _. _ . _ ~~yG - - - - ------~-- - - -~-`-~ .. _ . ~_._ _ . _ ~6.N- ----- - - -- ~J `~y~ ~ - -, ---- -- - -- - _--- - --- - _ - _ __ ~' - ~ ~~_ ~-~_~_~/ abo_ _ ~ ~'~ood_ -- ._. ~ - . -- - - - ~-- - . O.G~~_ _Gt~ ~ - _ - - - ---- - - --- ---- - ---- ------ ` ~ ~ j~'~°/ _.. - - ~ /~~~ -- - - - - - MGM - - )- - - --- = ~ - - . - ~ h~~ - .rte ~±-r ~.~~~ ~'~_~ Glh ~~ G'D~?S-- ~~ ~o /- ~~ ~/~ ~ / --- ~~~ ~ ~ i~ ~~ ~r~ - ~ _ - --- - 1~ _ .!9~,. _ j~~l,~,.. _ __ ~~~!~?d_G~~-.~- -O =.=~-~ -- Tom! ---~- ~f c - . --- - ~ ~- ,.- ,.,r. a o ~ v /. - - - --l/' - - - ~ - _ - -- -- - _. ~- --- - 0 - --~i.~G --._ _ _ . _.o - -- - -- -_._ . ~- i ~t _ - .~ Land developed~at 28 acres per unit .generates approximately. twice the number of vehicle trips' ~as at 16-units per acre (115/201:) o Motel ~- ,accomodations at 42 units/.acre approximately equal to residential use at 28 units/.acre-(210/201:). Retail commercial use enerates four times the number .of vehicle tri s of resi eritial use~at .units e an -more an wice the number at units acre o mote use 95). B' _ _ _ Dry S~G~-G.~~ .'U. i~~~ Gam". _ _ ~.[?~C~'C2i__ -__-- ' / ~ ... - - - ~ _ re~1 ~_ '~ j~X' ~ _ ~ ~:. I 1 _~ ~ ~ /~ ~-' oY __ - - - - - - - -- ;- QGC~.~ ~ ~ ~O/-~h~.. Q- _ __. - - - __ . - - -- --- ;~)/J VEHICI.E3 PER DiAY 18,000 12,000 6,000 .. - i ~iU LF ~tvd ~ J. '~~ E3TIMA-TED TR~-FFID VOLUME • 0 PRESENT I~ i i i i i Thousands 18 12 6 0 Sand,Ke,~ ~ra~ic • • PROJECTED PRESENT PRESENT DEVELOPMENT 34,000 • Thousa 18 12 • PROJECTED PROJECTED PRESENT PRESENT EXISTING DEVELOPT~NT ZONING to 29,000 Thousa 18 12 • • 6 0 PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PRESENT PRESENT EXISTING AMCNDED DEVELOPMENT ZONING ZONING p~r~i n~n~ C~~o~a~~~n~ o GEOGRAP~eC o EN~/IROIIENTAL o t~OPULAT-~0 Q TRAFFBC o ECON®IVIIC o LAN ® USE o POLI C1r • o PROCEDURAL 1 ~~~ r • -- _ _ __ / _/ -- __-.----. `l,~~`.-' `~-~- .. C+.O~O'!~O ~i ct Vii.. O ~ . %'?~o~~ G~2~~4°''~~~-C~"C~ _G(i~ - //~ ~i~ ~~ / ~, !/ 1 _ - --- - -- - - -- - - - - - B~ J ~~ __ ~O G ~ -iS~'7/ dam!-~~---lr'~!~G__._G-.7 ~~ ~i-r7G S'~ / .'~fv I ! ~ ~. - _- D-~ .. _._~ _- } ~ !'~'~G ~!_L!~7 ~ ~s~-Gt'~t~'v~ = "~ - -~!_.!7 i ~ _ ~C~t ~~t-rim _.O!'7 . ~.JG ~7G~ ./~ - +~+ ~ ~ f ~~ _ ~ /a •ser ~+~ ,~~~ ~c~. s ~, ~~ ~~~~ ------ - - - - -- -- I ~ - ~ o,~ .~i' lJ~,~'l~ ~i /'r~ G_~ _ `~ !'mil ~O~~C.%'~+ O "1 ~~~~ ~' ~` ' o ` ~ /~. /f --- ---~~ -_. _. ~..-_ _ _ . -u-P..~ ~/ - - - _. - - L~!lh~~ _~5'`~zc.-_./'~r/ S-~~~~, ~ c~,' ~4 9~- o •~S ~esr' ~~ ~ ~ ~~ - - ,~~ _ y ~ o ~~~- a-y - - - .~j moo _ „O ~ ~- _ *? ~ _ o~ ~- - ~f i GGa _- ~~~ ~ _c.r~r . 4~ __r-t - - y a ,, / ~ ~ 4 - -- - - ~ -- d_ '~G~ _ '~0-~~- - --- -- - - - ------- ------ ~4~. ,~ - - --- o~. ~-- --_ ---~~ .__ _--- --__- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~~ -- • -- -- --- I_ . I r • ~ ~ ---- -_ - ~.a-~T'~ ~4-_ --- C~_.GvcfC~---~Cca~---~.~__nc/ s~(- _ ~ .- /~a T~ _ _ _ i _ _ _ _ _ __ ____ _ _____ __ ___ _ ___ _ --- -- -- - ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ -. POTENTIAL POPULATION OF SAND KEY UNDER PRESENT ZONING 7-- 6910 ACREAGE POTENTIAL POPULATION OF SAND KEY - UNDER PROPOSED ZONING (Computed by Land Use of. Developed Land & By Acreage on - Vacant Parcels) w 6- - .6- . ~( 5309 ACREAGE RPD-5 UNDEVELOPED ~ ~ 533 5 ~ 846 14.39 .CTF-28 UNDEVELOPED 90.87 VACCANT 5343 RM-16 4- 683 20.33 4-- UNDEVELOPED I RM--16 4 0 4 12.0 3 DEVELOPED 3- 2- ~~ 1 50.97 OCCUPIED 156.7 0- ` 3- RM-28 2226 37.86 UNDEVELOPED - - 2-- 1- RM-28 _ -1094 18.61 DEVELOPED 0- CTF-28 developed 14.01-Acres CG without Residential 17..02 Acres Parklan d = 14.94 Acres Total Acres 154.52 i ~ - ~~ ~~- • WILLIAMS S` 1/VALKER ARCHITECTS CHAR TERE D PLANNER S • D E S I G N E R S • C O N S T R U C T I O N M A N A G E R S MEMBER S O F T H E A M E R I C A N I N S T I T U T E 1 4 4 5 C OUR T S TREE T C L E A R W A T E R October 28, 1977 ... City of Clearwater ' City Hall 112 South Osceola Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33516 Attention; Mike Paroby Assistant City Manager Re: Sand Key Shoppes Community~lmpact Statement U.S.S. Realty Development Dear Mr. Paroby: O F A R C H I T E C T S F L O R I D A 3 3 5 1 6 ~. In accordance with your review and approval of October 10, 1977 we are submitting. the following information. 1, Concerning the effect of the proposed project on marine life and water pollution. Dr. Heyward Mathews has written the following report.- . °In my recent Wildlife Report for the shopping center on San d. Key I thought I made it clear that it was my opinion that the project would have no adverse effect on the wild life on the inland or the marine life in the marine environ- ment adjacent to the upland. Evidently 1 did not made it clear enough for someone. It is my professional opinion that the runoff from the proposed shopping center °~:~rj L.I have no adverse effect on the waters of Clearwater Harbor or` the-Gulf of Mexico. "If you were planning a large tank farm, or a loading dock for large amounts of gas or oil, or handling large amounts of phosphate fertilizer, then the runoff might become a matter of concern, but a smal shopping center will produce-less harmful runoff than single family residence." 2. Concerning the number of entrance and exit access from Gulf Boulevard, the final plans submitted will reflect the modifications discussed including combining the drive of each phase, as well as interconnecting access between phases. 3. Dock location and detailed information well be supplied by U.S.S. Realty's architect for final site plan review. Very truly yours, ...yy'~ _ W I LL I AMS & WALKER ARCHITECTS CHARTERED !~ '~ E~Iward H. Walker, Jr., AIA E H'~J : I n h ,•~~. cc: Don Simpson U.S. Realty ~~ ~_____~ ~~E 1 ~~ /~~~~ ~ •~ L®G~i"~ ~O~ ,PODCE.PS & CUMM/~t/G5, /Nl.' K SHEET / d/AQ GIO. BOXG.%00 .4oP,POI~EO •' S' "5Ait/OY"LGD!/E~PAS ~I~ffl CGEfl,Plv,4TE,P, FLD,P/0,4 N. T 9 , 335/8 ENC/~t/EE~.vv 85G~9 Phone 4•aZ-4/// FLA,PEG.' •' sae~E~o,~,~p ~~~~ ~ PIZELIIVlIl~1A~2Y pl~ donee Oe ~~ aim . ~~~ .. . ,.. ~~~~ a'~~ ~,~EC/mil/~t/,4~Y ~L,4T • ~~ w~sf Bay Di-i~e CLEA c6V,~yE,~ O/ t~EGL AS CnUit/TY ~'LO~P/~ PREPARED FOR+ ATE+ CAL E + /' - G ,P. C.' OEIiELp~MENT, /i(/C. SI GNED+ r. C.,P J08 N0. + !/D/7 r"' '+- / .PiC//,q'PD W CDPE RAWN + ~" , ~~ ~ • e FILE N0. j Of ~~~ L L OVERAS , BAUR AND STEVENS 3 / n~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS ~ GRANADA PLAZA -SUITE 105 3250;0 S. HIGHWAY•N0. l9 NORTH ¢.ti/ehienbacken ,Pd CLEARWATER , FLORIDA 33515 PHONE+ 764-3965 w dfh ,4ve. N~% E~'~ ~ ~~c .SAND BEY SUB1~/~//S/Oti/ PLAN "N®T F©R C4N~rI"RU~TION PURP®~~"~" ' _ . ~ ~. ., .. ,:~,~.. ~ o s ~ ~~r