Loading...
RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO MOTION LIMITING THE ISSUES OF FACTS ON HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 89-3063 of .. , I RECIIVED S'fATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AUG 15J9B9 CITY OF CLEARWATER, Petitioner CITY CLEEK vs. CASE NO. 89-3063 ROGER BRENNAN, Respondent, / RESPONDE~T RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR LIMITING THE ISSUES OF FACTS ON THE HEARING 1. The City of Clearwaters request to limit the issue of the hearing to whether there was just cause for descipline and - whether the penalty was appropriate is unjust. 2. It is obvious that the assistant city attorney did not read the charges against me or he would have realized that I was charged with violations of Rule 14, Section 1, paragraph (b), (e) and (k) of the Civil Service Rules and regulations of the City of Clearwater. a) Incompetency, inefficiency, offensive conduct and language and insubordination, somehow does not equate to a " Basic charge of a highly inappropriate memorandum." 3. It is also obvious that the assistant city attorneys attempt to intimidate me, by implying that the city would object to any witness other than one concerning the direct issues contained in the Notice of Suspension is uncalled for. The respondent realizes that the assistant city attorney can object to anything he wants to, however I do believe it is up to the Hearing Officer to determine whether the objection has merit or not. 4. Therefore the respondent objects to the citys request to limi t the number of subpoenas issued or to limi t the amounJ...of factua issues presented. 6. The respondent has been charged with violating civil service rule 14, section 1, paragraphs (b), (e) and (k). In that charge the city has made (1) one/specification with (5) five specific items. 'OJ.,.....,. v of I I .... (continued) It is the respondents request to address each and everyone of those specific items in order to establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that these charges are a frivolous attempt of retaliation. It is therefore the respondents request that each and every subpoena be issued and that no limit be placed on the factual issues presented as long as they pertain to the specifics I have been charged with. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy hereof has been furnished this I \ day of ~ ' 1989, to the following: Donald D. Conn, Hearing Officer Rita Garvey, Mayor of the City of Clearwater William Nunamaker, City Commissioner Richard Fitzgerald, City Commissioner - Donald Winner, City Commissioner Lee Regulski,City Commissioner Ron Rabun, City Manager eity ClerkS,t{)'if:ice ,Ciityr-:.I:t:nerll! Miles Lance, Assistant City Attorney ~~. Utilities Credit Manager. 12 Southwind Dr. Belleair Bluffs, Florida 346 (813) 584-0775 ...~ r~.. / ~ .,;. I I STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CITY OF CLEARWATER, Petitioner vs. CASE NO. 89-3063 ROGER BRENNAN, Respondent. / MOTION FOR LIMITING THE ISSUES OF FACT ON THE HEARING Pet it ioner, CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, moves that the factua 1 issues for the above hearing, be limited to the issues described in the Notice of Suspension dated May A'; 1989, and further that the hearing be limited to the ultimate issue of whether the disciplinary action was for just cause, and whether the punishment of a five (5) day suspension is appropriate. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy hereof has been furnished this 9~ day of ~ , 191:2., to the following: Donald D. Conn, Hearing Officer; Rita Garvey, Mayor of the City of Clearwater; William Nunamaker, Richard Fitzgerald, Donald Winner and Lee Regulski, City Commissioners; Ron H. Rabun, City Manager; City Clerk's Office of the City of Clearwater and Roger C. Brennan, 12 Southwind Dr., Belleair Bluffs, Florida 34640. MilJ(j~/;.JJ ~/II~ Assistant City Attorney P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 34618 (813) 462-6760 ,':. :~.. I